SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 20-F

..- REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20042005

OR

..- TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

- SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-14370

COMPAÑÍA DE MINAS BUENAVENTURA S.A.A.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

BUENAVENTURA MINING COMPANY INC.

(Translation of Registrant's name into English)

REPUBLIC OF PERU

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

CARLOS VILLARAN 790

SANTA CATALINA, LIMA 13, PERU

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common shares, nominal (par) value of four Peruvian Nuevos Soles per share

American Depositary Shares (ADSs) representing one Common share each

 

New York Stock Exchange Inc.٭

Lima Stock Exchange

New York Stock Exchange Inc.**

٭ Not for trading but only in connection with the registration of ADSs pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Commission

_________________

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

Common shares nominal (par) value of S/.4.00 per share 137,444,962137,444,962**

Investment shares nominal (par) value of S/.4.00 per share372,320

*PriorIndicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes- Nox

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to May 3, 2002,file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Company had Series A common shares, Series B common shares and Investment shares. Since that date, following the redesignationSecurities Exchange Act of Series B common shares as Series A common shares and thereafter of Series A common shares as Common shares, the Company has Common shares and Investment shares.1934.

Yes- Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx No..-

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer- #9; Accelerated filer- Non-accelerated filerx

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17..- Item 18x

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes- Nox

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION*

PART I*

ITEM 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers*

ITEM 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable*

ITEM 3. Key Information*

ITEM 4. Information on the Company*

ITEM 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects*

ITEM 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees*

ITEM 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions*

ITEM 8. Financial Information*

ITEM 9. The Offer and Listing*

ITEM 10. Additional Information*

ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk*

ITEM 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities*

PART II*

ITEM 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies*

ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds*

ITEM 15. Controls and Procedures*

ITEM 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert*

ITEM 16B. Code of Ethics*

ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services*

ITEM 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees*

ITEM 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers 152*

PART III*

ITEM 17. Financial Statements*

ITEM 18. Financial Statements*

ITEM 19. Exhibits*

INTRODUCTION

Presentation of Financial Information

As used in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, (the "Annual Report" or the "Form 20-F"),Annual Report, unless the context otherwise requires, the "Company"references to "we," "us," "our," "Company," "BVN" or "Buenaventura" meansmean Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, references to "$", "US$", "Dollars" and "U.S. Dollars" are to United States Dollars, and references to "S/.", "Nuevo Sol" or "Nuevos Soles" are to Peruvian Nuevos Soles, the legal currency of the Republic of Peru, ("Peru").or Peru.

BuenaventuraWe and itsour subsidiaries maintain theirour financial books and records in Nuevos Soles and present theirour financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Peru, ("which we refer to as Peruvian GAAP").GAAP. See Note 3938 to theour audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004 (the "Company2005, or the Financial Statements")Statements, beginning at page F-53F-2 for a description of the significant differences between the accounting principles followed by the Companywe follow under Peruvian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, ("which we refer to as U.S. GAAP"),GAAP, and Note 4039 to the Company Financial Statements for a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of net income and shareholders' equity for the periods covered. Pursuant to the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, (the "Commission"),or the Commission, this Annual Report includes certain separate financial statements and other financial information of Minera YanacochaY anacocha S.R.L. ("Yanacocha")., or Yanacocha. Yanacocha maintains its financial books and records in U.S. Dollars and presents its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See Note 17 to the audited financial statements of Yanacocha as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004 (the "Yanacocha2005, or the Yanacocha Financial Statements")Statements, beginning at page F-90F-51 for a description of the significant differences between the accounting principles followed by Yanacocha under U.S. GAAP and Peruvian GAAP, and for a reconciliation to Peruvian GAAP of net income and partners' equity for the periods covered. Pursuant

We record our investment in Yanacocha in accordance with the equity method. Our interest in Yanacocha has been calculated at 43.65 percent for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, as described in "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-The Company-General" and Note 10 to the Financial Statements.

Prior to January 1, 2005, in accordance with Peruvian GAAP and in accordance with the methodology approved by the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board, financial data for all periods in theour financial statements of the Company included herein have beenwere adjusted for inflation using theIndice de Precios al por Mayor a Nivel Nacional (National Wholesale Price Index for Peru, or "IPM")IPM) published by theInstituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática(Nati onalNational Institute of Statistics, or "INEI")INEI). This methodology required the adjustment of non-monetary assets and liabilities by a factor corresponding to the inflation or deflation rate during the period covered by the Financial Statements and reflected the net result of the adjustment in the "Result from Exposure to Inflation" line item of the income statement. See Note 2(a) to the Company Financial Statements. UnlessIn 2004, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board adopted Resolution No. 031-2004-EF/93.01, suspending the restatement of the financial statements to recogniz e the effect of inflation effective January 1, 2005. Our restated financial statement balances as of December 31, 2004 have been considered the initial financial statement balances as of January 1, 2005. As a result, unless otherwise specified, financial data regarding the Companyprior to January 1, 2005 is presented herein in accordance with Peruvian GAAP and in constant Nuevos Soles as of December 31, 2004, and financial data regarding Yanacocha is presented herein in accordance with U.S. GAAP and in U.S. Dollars.

The Company Financial Statements record the Company's investment in Yanacocha in accordance with the equity method. The Company's interest in Yanacocha has been calculated at 43.65 percent for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, as described in "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-The Company-General" and Note 12 to the Company Financial Statements.

In 1989, the Peruvian accounting standards board approved the inclusion in the financial statements of each Peruvian company of theResultado por Exposición a la Inflación ("Result from Exposure to Inflation"), which seeks to account for the effects of inflation or deflation by adjusting the value of non-monetary assets and liabilities by a factor corresponding to the inflation or deflation rate during the period covered by the financial statements. Monetary assets and liabilities are not adjusted. The net result of the adjustment is reflected in the "Result from Exposure to Inflation" line item of the income statement. This requirement was applied to the Company in 1991 and thereafter. See Note 2(a) to the Company Financial Statements. The inflation adjustment factors used in the calculation of the Result from Exposure to Inflation since 1991 are a function of the IPM. The IPM increased by 3.8 percent in 2000, decreased by 2.2 percent in 2001, increased by 1.7 percent in 2002, increased by 2.0 percent in 2003 and increasedby 4.9 percent in 2004.

In 2004, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board adopted Resolution No. 031-2004-EF/93.01, suspending the restatement of the financial statements to recognize the effect of inflation effective January 1, 2005. The Company's restated financial statement balances as of December 31, 2004 will be considered the initial financial statement balances as of January 1, 2005.

Exchange Rates

This Annual Report contains translations of certain Nuevo Sol amounts into Dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. These translations should not be construed as representations that the Nuevo Sol amounts actually represent such equivalent Dollar amounts or could be converted into Dollars at the rate indicated as of the dates mentioned herein or at all. Unless otherwise indicated, such Dollar amounts have been translated from Nuevos Soles at an exchange rate of S/.3.283.3.431 = US$1.00, the average of the market exchange ratesrate for the purchase and sale of Dollars on December 31, 2004.2005 as published by theSuperintendencia de Bancos y Seguros (Superintendent of Bank and Insurance, or the SBS). The translation of amounts expressed in nominal or constant Nuevos Soles with purchasing power as of a specified date by the then-prevailing exchange rate may result in presentation of Dollar amounts that differ from the Dollar amounts that would have been obtained by translating nominal or constant NuevosN uevos Soles with purchasing power as of another specified date by the prevailin gprevailing exchange rate on that specified date. See "Item 3. Key Information-Exchange Rates" for information regarding the average rates of exchange between the Nuevo Sol and the Dollar for the periods specified therein.

Certain amounts and percentages have been rounded for presentation purposes and may not sum exactly.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report contain "forward-looking" information (as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) that involve risks and uncertainties, including those concerning the Company'sour and Yanacocha's costs and expenses, results of exploration, the continued improving efficiency of operations, prevailing market prices of gold, silver and other metals mined, the success of joint ventures, estimates of future exploration, development and production, subsidiaries' plans for capital expenditures, estimates of reserves and Peruvian political, economic and legal developments. These forward-looking statements reflect the Company'sour view with respect to the Company'sour and Yanacocha's future financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, including but not limited to those discussed under "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors".

PART I

ITEM 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. Key Information

Selected Financial Data

Company Selected Financial Information and Operating Data

The following information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Company Financial Statements including the Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected financial information as of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, and for the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, is derived from the Company Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. The report of Medina, Zaldivar, Paredes & Asociados (a member firm of Ernst & Young International) on the Company's 2003our 2004 and 20042005 Financial Statements appears elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Company Financial Statements are prepared and presented in accordance with Peruvian GAAP, which differ in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 3938 to the Company Financial Statements provides a description of the principal differences between Peruvian GAAP and U.S. GAAP as such differences relate to the Company,us, and Note 4039 to the Company Financial StatementsStatement s provides a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of the Company'sour net income for the years ended 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, and shareholders' equity as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005. The selected financial information as of December 31, 2000 and 2001 and for the yearsyear then ended has been derived from the Company's financial statementsour Financial Statements as of and for the yearsyear then ended, which havehas been audited by Medina, Zaldivar y Asociados (a member firm of Andersen Worldwide), who have ceased operations. The operating data presented below is derived from the Company'sour records and has not been subject to audit. The financial information and operating data presented below should be read in conjunction with "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-The Company" and the Company Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto and other financial information included in this Annual Report.

As of and for the year ended December 31,

As of and for the year ended December 31,

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

(In thousands of constant S/.)(1)

 

(In thousands of US$)(1)(2)

(In thousands of constant S/.)(1)

(In thousands of US$)(1)(2)

Income statement data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peruvian GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

414,154

486,428

575,707

735,306

908,441

276,711

486,428

575,707

735,306

908,441

936,595

272,980

Income realized from sale of future production

-

-

-

-

68,837

20,968

-

-

68,837

92,753

27,034

Royalties income

56,106

59,030

82,350

116,857

128,889

39,260

59,030

82,350

116,857

128,889

152,342

44,402

Total revenues

470,260

545,458

658,057

852,163

1,106,167

336,939

545,458

658,057

852,163

1,106,167

1,181,690

344,416

Costs of operation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating costs

(262,610)

(271,615)

(273,686)

(302,572)

(338,074)

(102,977)

(296,600)

(275,320)

(306,624)

(340,697)

(343,327)

(100,066)

Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites

(33,341)

(63,659)

(77,660)

(85,715)

(127,169)

(38,736)

(63,659)

(77,660)

(86,354)

(127,435)

(136,053)

(39,654)

Depreciation and amortization

(34,376)

(39,857)

(43,195)

(49,118)

(59,473)

(18,115)

(55,774)

(59,703)

(63,786)

(74,077)

(111,177)

(32,404)

Total costs of operation

(330,327)

(375,131)

(394,541)

(437,405)

(524,716)

(159,828)

(416,033)

(412,683)

(456,764)

(542,209)

(590,557)

(172,124)

Gross margin

139,933

170,327

263,516

414,758

581,451

177,111

129,425

245,374

395,399

563,958

591,133

172,292

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration costs in

non-operational mining sites

(43,968)

(51,847)

(40,309)

(59,255)

(88,241)

(26,878)

(51,847)

(40,309)

(59,255)

(88,241)

(91,919)

(26,792)

General and administrative

(68,034)

(67,600)

(79,298)

(123,161)

(76,866)

(23,413)

(67,600)

(79,298)

(123,161)

(76,866)

(112,630)

(32,827)

Royalties to third parties

(10,322)

(14,202)

(14,681)

(25,142)

(24,918)

(7,590)

Royalties

(14,202)

(14,681)

(25,142)

(31,557)

(40,350)

(11,760)

Selling

(31,051)

(28,171)

(24,314)

(25,776)

(17,839)

(5,435)

(28,171)

(24,314)

(25,776)

(17,839)

(15,864)

(4,624)

Amortization of mining concessions and goodwill

(6,520)

(15,995)

(17,441)

(15,578)

(15,598)

(4,749)

(78)

(933)

(910)

(994)

(896)

(261)

Royalties to the Peruvian government

-

-

-

-

(6,639)

(2,022)

Assets impairment loss and

write-off

-

(24,985)

(1,634)

(4,691)

(2,889)

(880)

Total operating expenses

(159,895)

(202,800)

(177,677)

(253,603)

(232,990)

(70,967)

(161,898)

(159,535)

(234,244)

(215,497)

(261,659)

(76,264)

Operating income (loss)

(19,962)

(32,473)

85,839

161,155

348,461

106,144

(32,473)

85,839

161,155

348,461

329,474

96,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expenses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share in affiliated companies

298,008

214,185

353,963

557,558

575,858

175,406

214,185

353,963

557,558

575,858

870,748

253,788

Gain (loss) from change in the fair value of derivative instruments

-

-

-

(647,218)

14,629

4,456

63,432

44,760

(668,030)

(58,774)

(87,872)

(25,611)

Interest income

6,943

14,523

9,215

7,785

12,132

3,694

14,523

9,215

7,785

12,132

11,646

3,394

Realized gain (loss) in derivative instruments-------

44,243

63,432

44,760

(20,812)

(73,403)

(22,359)

Gain (loss) from exposure to inflation

2,660

1,742

(3,312)

321

(22,483)

(6,849)

1,742

(3,312)

793

(9,847)

-

Exchange difference gain (loss)

(478)

(6,246)

(472)

(12,636)

1,483

432

Interest expense

(9,646)

(18,966)

(16,702)

(8,687)

(7,515)

(2,289)

(18,488)

(10,456)

(8,687)

(7,515)

(5,797)

(1,689)

Loss from sale of subsidiary's shares

-

-

(7,069)

-

-

-

-

(7,069)

-

-

Other, net

80,602

13,141

2,954

(12,804)

(13,505)

(4,114)

13,141

2,954

(12,804)

(13,505)

(18,305)

(5,334)

Total other income (expenses), net

422,810

288,057

383,809

(123,857)

485,713

147,945

288,057

383,809

(123,857)

485,713

771,903

224,980

Income before workers' profit sharing, income tax, minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change

402,848

255,584

469,648

37,298

834,174

254,089

255,584

469,648

37,298

834,174

1,101,377

321,008

Provision for workers' profit sharing

(4,647)

(738)

(1,613)

62,887

(18,356)

(5,591)

(738)

(1,613)

62,887

(18,356)

(8,569)

(2,498)

Provision for income tax

(29,261)

(26,689)

(26,859)

198,286

(101,997)

(31,068)

(26,689)

(26,859)

198,286

(101,997)

(75,406)

(21,978)

Income before minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

368,940

228,157

441,176

298,471

713,821

217,430

228,157

441,176

298,471

713,821

1,017,402

296,532

Minority interest

(34,386)

4,249

(25,461)

(51,023)

(28,171)

(8,581)

4,249

(25,461)

(51,023)

(28,171)

(66,003)

(19,237)

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change--------..

334,554

232,406

415,715

247,448

685,650

208,849

232,406

415,715

247,448

685,650

951,399

277,295

Cumulative effect of accounting change

(68,023)

-

-

(72,295)

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles due to mine closing

-

-

(72,295)

-

-

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles due to stripping costs

-

-

(10,416)

(3,036)

Net income

266,531

232,406

415,715

175,153

685,650

208,849

232,406

415,715

175,153

685,650

940,983

274,259

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share(3)

2.11

1.84

3.27

1.38

5.39

1.64

Net income per ADS(3)

2.11

1.84

3.27

1.38

5.39

1.64

Basic and diluted net income per share(3) (4)

1.84

3.27

1.38

5.39

7.40

2.16

Basic and diluted net income per ADS(3)

1.84

3.27

1.38

5.39

7.40

2.16

Dividends per share

0.29

0.39

0.59

1.25

1.10

0.33

0.39

0.59

1.25

1.10

1.20

0.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average number of shares outstanding

126,252,152

126,602,016

127,236,219

127,236,219

127,236,219

127,236,219

126,602,016

127,236,219

127,229,844

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

(23,252)

(7,758)

84,870

225,071

330,973

100,823

(7,758)

84,870

225,071

330,973

321,295

93,645

Net income

257,795

172,728

43,576

179,036

688,897

209,838

Net income per share(3)

2.04

1.36

0.34

1.41

5.41

1.65

Net income per ADS(3)

2.04

1.36

0.34

1.41

5.41

1.65

Net income - restated(5) ----.

172,354

53,742

192,879

712,674

942,669

274,751

Basic and diluted net income per share - restated(3)

1.36

0.42

1.52

5.60

7.41

2.16

Basic and diluted net income per ADS- restated(3)(5)

1.36

0.42

1.52

5.60

7.41

2.16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peruvian GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

1,739,664

2,021,456

2,339,563

3,220,818

3,571,395

1,087,845

2,021,456

2,339,563

3,220,818

3,571,395

4,281,341

1,247,841

Total debt

112,815

269,101

184,516

139,382

64,513

19,651

269,101

184,516

139,382

64,513

29,227

8,518

Shareholders' equity

1,418,175

1,615,159

1,982,061

1,699,649

2,180,133

664,067

1,615,159

1,982,061

1,699,649

2,180,133

2,869,304

836,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

1,715,950

2,015,474

2,322,771

3,211,020

3,556,680

1,083,363

Shareholders' equity

1,383,932

1,516,374

1,508,853

1,690,157

2,165,887

659,728

Total assets - restated(5)

2,039,317

2,356,908

3,048,063

3,368,003

4,281,384

1,247,853

Shareholders' equity - restated(6)

1,540,217

1,542,990

1,527,200

1,972,340

2,869,792

836,430

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating data (unaudited):(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating data (unaudited):(5)

 

 

 

Production:

Gold (oz.)

131,475

208,874

277,490

319,427

357,562

-

208,874

277,490

319,427

357,562

388,042

N/A

Silver (oz.)

10,736,024

12,473,284

13,346,374

13,813,658

15,095,562

-

12,473,284

13,346,374

13,813,658

15,095,562

16,429,816

N/A

Proven and probable reserves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

246,861

206,232

592,102

870,345

931,924

-

206,232

592,102

870,345

931,924

1,036,543

N/A

Silver (oz.)

63,856,169

59,967,350

72,119,422

92,817,825

95,862,405

-

59,967,350

72,119,422

92,817,825

95,862,405

116,452,462

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

____________________

(1) Except per share, per ADS, outstanding shares and operating data.

(2) Translated into U.S. Dollars at the rate of S/.3.283=..3.431=US$1.00, the average of the market exchange ratesrate for the purchase and sale of U.S. Dollars as ofon December 31, 20042005 as published by theSuperintendencia de Bancos y Seguros (Superintendency SBS. U.S. Dollar amounts are included solely for the convenience of Banks and Insurancethe reader. The convenience translation should not be construed as a representation that the Peruvian Nuevos Soles amounts have been, could have been or "SBS").could be converted into U.S. Dollars at the foregoing or any other rate of exchange.

(3) Income per share has been calculated for each year as net income divided by average number of shares outstanding during the year. Until December 31, 2001, average shares outstanding included Series A Shares, Series B Shares and Investment Shares; income per ADS was calculated on the basis of two Series B Shares per ADS. On April 30, 2002, the Companywe approved the redesignation of the Series B Shares as Series A Shares and the immediate redesignation thereafter of Series A Shares as Common Shares. As of April 30,December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the total number of Common Shares and Investment Shares outstanding was 137,444,962, including 10,585,130 treasury shares,, and the total number of Investment Shares Outstanding was 372,320, including 15,933 treasury shares, respectively. See Note 22 to the Company Financial Statements.shares. On October 28, 2003, the Companywe approved a modification of the ratio of the Common Shares to ADSs from two Common Shares per ADS to one Common Share p erper ADS. The ratio change became effective on November 12, 2003 and income per ADS in prior years has been restated to reflect this modification. During 2005, we acquired 15,055 Investment Shares that are held as treasury shares.

(4) Basically diluted.

(5) Net income, total assets and shareholders' equity for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 have been adjusted retroactively to comply with APB 18 - The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, due to the change in the accounting treatment of Cerro Verde's investment during 2005. See Note 38 to the Financial Statements.

(6) The amounts in this table reflect our total operating data and the total operating data for the Company andof each of itsour consolidated subsidiaries for each year, 20002001 through 2004.2005. As of December 31, 2004, the Company's2005, our ownership percentages for the relevant companies were as follows: Condesa, 100%; Conenhua, 100%; Inminsur, 78.04%; Colquijirca, 59.90%; Chaupiloma, 60.0% and Cedimin, 100%.

As of December 31, 2004, Minera Paula, which as of October 22, 2004 was 100% owned by the Company,us, was merged with and into Cedimin and is no longer a separate legal entity.

Yanacocha Selected Financial Information and Operating Data

The following table presents selected financial information and operating data for Yanacocha at the dates and for each of the periods indicated. This information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Yanacocha Financial Statements, which have been audited by Dongo-Soria Gaveglio y Asociados (a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers). The report of Dongo-Soria Gaveglio y Asociados on the Yanacocha Financial Statements appears elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Yanacocha Financial Statements are prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which differ in certain respects from Peruvian GAAP. Note 17 to the Yanacocha Financial Statements provides a description of the principal differences between U.S. GAAP and Peruvian GAAP, as such differences relate to Yanacocha, as well as a reconciliation to Peruvian GAAP of Yanacocha's net income for the years ended 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and partners' equity as of December 31, 2 003004 and 2004.2005. The operating data presented below, which is based on 100 percent of Yanacocha's production and reserves, is derived from Yanacocha's records and has not been subject to audit. The financial information presented below should be read in conjunction with "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Yanacocha" and the Yanacocha Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto and other financial information included in this Annual Report.

 

As of and for the year ended December 31,

As of and for the year ended December 31,

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

(In thousands of US$)(1)

(In thousands of US$)(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income statement data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

491,791

517,800

713,398

1,036,370

1,249,882

517,800

713,398

1,036,370

1,249,882

1,490,402

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs applicable to sales

(172,778)

(241,991)

(312,980)

(377,214)

(450,825)

(241,991)

(312,980)

(377,214)

(450,825)

(507,806)

Depreciation and depletion

(58,122)

(73,484)

(114,769)

(146,822)

(179,441)

(73,484)

(114,769)

(146,822)

(179,441)

(193,587)

Exploration costs

(10,349)

(12,020)

(11,121)

(13,574)

(35,236)

(12,020)

(11,121)

(13,574)

(35,236)

(32,884)

General and administrative costs

(1,087)

(3,589)

(4,682)

(5,126)

(4,986)

(3,589)

(4,682)

(5,126)

(4,986)

(5,453)

Other expenses

(10,317)

(8,641)

160

(18,126)

(6,135)

(8,641)

160

(18,126)

(6,135)

(6,669)

Total operating expenses

(252,653)

(339,725)

(443,392)

(560,862)

(676,623)

(339,725)

(443,392)

(560,862)

(676,623)

(733,061)

Operating income

Operating income

239,138

178,075

270,006

443,541

573,259

Operating income

178,075

270,006

443,541

573,259

757,341

Interest expense and other

Interest expense and other

(1,475)

(4,036)

(7,473)

(1,055)

(1,392)

Interest expense and other

(4,036)

(7,473)

(1,055)

(1,392)

3,540

Pre-tax income

Pre-tax income

237,663

174,039

262,533

474,453

571,867

Pre-tax income

174,039

262,533

474,453

571,867

760,881

Income tax provision

Income tax provision

(43,066)

(40,242)

(64,611)

(121,688)

(181,563)

Income tax provision

(40,242)

(64,611)

(121,688)

(181,563)

(235,407)

Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

194,597

133,797

197,922

352,765

390,304

Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

133,797

197,922

352,765

390,304

525,474

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net

(4,986)

0

0

(32,353)

0

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net

0

0

(32,353)

0

0

Net income and comprehensive income

Net income and comprehensive income

189,611

133,797

197,922

320,412

390,304

Net income and comprehensive income

133,797

197,922

320,412

390,304

525,474

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peruvian GAAP

Peruvian GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

Peruvian GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues(3)

Revenues(3)

539,895

729,285

1,059,951

1,266,550

1,527,609

Operating income

Operating income

162,786

97,209

281,274

475,894

605,019

Operating income

97,209

281,274

475,894

605,019

675,293

Net income

Net income

136,734

80,927

220,847

313,143

427,975

Net income

80,927

220,847

313,143

427,975

535,476

Balance sheet data:

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP

U.S. GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

Total assets

762,119

962,555

1,055,280

1,146,041

1,207,748

Total assets

962,555

1,055,280

1,146,041

1,207,748

1,549,583

Total debt

Total debt

141,277

198,301

114,954

67,356

37,316

Total debt

198,301

114,954

67,356

37,316

3,160

Partners' equity

Partners' equity

409,431

533,228

680,458

700,870

811,174

Partners' equity

533,228

680,458

700,870

811,174

1,156,648

Peruvian GAAP

Peruvian GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

Peruvian GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

Total assets

516,450

638,107

868,992

974,630

1,091,571

Total assets

638,107

868,992

974,630

1,091,571

1,473,255

Total debt

Total debt

194,858

112,581

65,777

36,553

2,850

Partners' equity

Partners' equity

256,035

326,962

574,085

587,228

735,203

Partners' equity

326,962

574,085

587,228

735,203

1,090,679

Operating data (unaudited):

Operating data (unaudited):

 

 

 

 

 

Operating data (unaudited):

 

 

 

 

 

Gold produced (oz.)

Gold produced (oz.)

1,795,398

1,902,489

2,285,584

2,851,143

3,017,303

Gold produced (oz.)

1,902,489

2,285,584

2,851,143

3,017,303

3,333,088

Gold proven and probable reserves (thousands of oz.)

Gold proven and probable reserves (thousands of oz.)

36,553

34,173

32,605

31,709

32,257

Gold proven and probable reserves (thousands of oz.)

34,173

32,605

31,709

32,257

32,620

Average cash production cost (US$
per oz.)(2)

Average cash production cost (US$
per oz.)(2)

96

123

134

129

146

Average cash production cost (US$
per oz.)(2)

123

134

129

146

150

________________

(1) Except operating data.

(2) Operating cash cost per ounce of gold sold is defined as the total of costs applicable to sales less non-cash provisions for reclamation and remediation costs. Operating cash is comprised of operating costs, management fees, royalty expenses, selling expenses, write-off of assets, workers' profit participation costs and credits for by-product sales. Operating cash cost is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not have a standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures provided by other companies. When analyzing operating performance, investors should use operating cash cost in addition to, and not as an alternative to, cost of sales. Operating cash cost per ounce is derived from historical statements of income and is presented as supplemental information because management believes it provides additional information to evaluate operations. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Yanacocha-Operating Results-Non-GAAP information reconciliation".

(3) Under US GAAP, Yanacocha recognizes revenue when the price is determinable and upon delivery and transfer of title of gold to the customer. In addition, revenues from silver sales are credited to cost applicable to sales as a by-product credit. Under Peruvian GAAP, revenue, including gold and silver sales, is recognized, net of transportation and refining costs, when doré is delivered to the shipper.

Exchange Rates

The following table sets forth the high and low month-end rates and the average and end-of-period offered rates for the sale of Nuevos Soles in U.S. Dollars for the period indicated, as published by the SBS. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon buying rate for Nuevos Soles.

Exchange Rates
(Nuevos Soles per US$)(1)

Year

High(2)

Low(2)

Average(3)

Period end(4)

High(2)

Low(2)

Average(3)

Period end(4)

 

 

2000

3.531

3.487

3.493

3.525

2001

3.623

3.434

3.506

3.444

3.623

3.434

3.506

3.444

2002

3.644

3.433

3.517

3.514

3.644

3.433

3.517

3.514

2003

3.495

3.461

3.478

3.463

3.495

3.461

3.478

3.463

2004

3.499

3.277

3.413

3.277

3.499

3.277

3.413

3.277

2004

High(5)

Low(5)

Average(6)

Period end(7)

2005

3.427

3.253

3.303

3.427

2005

High(5)

Low(5)

Average(6)

Period end(7)

December

3.302

3.263

3.276

3.277

3.440

3.400

3.423

3.429

2005

 

2006

 

January

3.282

3.258

3.266

3.260

3.451

3.305

3.392

3.310

February

3.262

3.255

3.258

3.256

3.313

3.279

3.288

3.290

March

3.262

3.255

3.258

3.259

3.359

3.303

3.338

3.356

April

3.260

3.254

3.257

3.256

3.371

3.308

3.331

3.310

May (through May 25, 2005)

3.258

3.250

3.254

May

3.304

3.258

3.278

3.293

 

___________________

(1) Expressed in nominal (not inflation adjusted) Nuevos Soles.

(2) Highest and lowest of the twelve month-end exchange rates for each year based on the offered rate.

(3) Average of month-end exchange rates based on the offered rate.

(4) End of period exchange rates based on the offered rate.

(5) Highest and lowest of the exchange notes based on the offered rate on the last day of each month.

(6) Average of the exchange rates based on the offered rate on the last date of each day in the relevant month.

(7) The exchange rate based on the offered rate on the last day of each relevant month.

Source: SBS

On May 25, 2005,June 1, 2006, the offered rate for Dollars as published by the SBS was S/.3.254.3.279 = US$1.00.

Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Risk Factors

Factors Relating to the Company

Dependence on Joint VenturesMining Exploration Agreements

An integral part of the Company'sour operations is the participation in joint venturemining exploration projects with experienced mining companies. At the date of this Annual Report, the Company was participating in several joint operating agreements, joint ventures and other joint exploration and mining enterprises and companies, including Yanacocha.Joint ventureSuch projects benefit the Companyus by providing a source of outside funds for exploration of mining rights, by giving the Companyus access to the holdings of outside parties without the riskrisks and costs of outright acquisitionacquisition. They also enable us to expand the scope of knowledge and by expanding the Company'sexperience of our senior management, geologists and engineers scope of knowledge and experience as a result ofthrough increased contact with their counterparts from other organizations. The CompanyWe can be highly dependent upon itsour partners, co-venturers or other shareholders in a joint venturemining exploration project carrying out their obligations under the applicable joint venturemining exploration agreement or jointmining operating agreement. Such partners, co-vent urersco-venturers and other shareholders in a joint mining exploration venture may contribute capital to cover the expenses of the joint venture project or provide critical technological expertise and/or management and organizational expertise. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Overview" for a description of how the Companywe and Newmont Mining Corporation, a Delaware corporation, ("or Newmont Mining"),Mining, have joined together to participate in Yanacocha and how Yanacocha is dependent upon Newmont Peru Limited, Peruvian Branch, ("or Newmont Peru")Peru, to provide management and other expertise to the Yanacocha project. If, however, a partner, a co-venturer or in certain cases another shareholder does not carry out its obligations under the applicable joint venture agreement, joint mining operating agreement, by-laws or shareholders agreement, the value of the Company'sour investment in the joint venturemining exploration project could be adversely affected and the Companywe could incur significant expense in enforcing itsour rights or pursuing remedies. There can be no assurance t hat the Company'sthat our current or future partners will fulfill their obligations under such agreements. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha" and "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Business Overview-Exploration"Ov erview-Exploration".

Investment in International Operations

Foreign operations are subject to certain risks inherent in conducting business abroad, including, among others, exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, devaluations or supply restrictions, exchange control regulations, government policies, price and wage controls, taxation, intervention, social instability and other political, economic or diplomatic developments beyond the Company'sour control. There can be no assurance that the Company'sour foreign exploration activities will not be adversely affected in the future.

The Company is carryingWe carry out our exploration activities in Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Mexico and Spain. In recent years, Argentina has suffered a prolonged economic crisis. Thecrisis for the past several years; however, such economic conditions in Argentina have not affected the Company andus. In recent months, the Argentine economy has improved in recent months. However,shown signs of improvement, although there can be no assurance as to when the Argentine economy will recover or if the crisis will continue and whether the Companywe may be affected in the future.

Prices of Gold and Silver

Because the Company'sour revenues are derived primarily from the sale of ore concentrates containing gold and silver, and Yanacocha's revenues are derived primarily from the sale of gold and silver, the prices the Companywe and Yanacocha obtain for gold and silver and ore concentrates containing such metals, and the Company'sour and Yanacocha's earnings, are directly related to world market prices for such metals. Such prices have historically fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company'sour control, including the overall demand for and worldwide supply of gold, silver and other metals; the availability and price of competing commodities, international economic trends, currency exchange fluctuations, expectations of inflation, actions of commodity markets participants, consumption and demand patterns and political events in major producing countries. Although the Company engageswe engage in hedging activities, such as forward sales and option contracts, to minimize its exposu reour exposure to fluctuations in the prices of gold, silver and other metals, there can be no assurance that hedging activities will protect the Companyus from price fluctuations in such metals, seemetals. In 2006, management decided to close out gold derivative contracts maintained as of December 31, 2005 and replace them with normal sales contracts. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk". and Note 34 to the Financial Statements. For information on gold and silver prices for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2004,2005, see "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Business Overview-Sales of Metal Concentrates". On December 31, 200430, 2005 and April 29, 2005,28, 2006, the morning fixing price for gold on the London Bullion Market was US$438.00513 per ounce and US$435.70638.25 per ounce, respectively. On December 31, 200430, 2005 and April 29, 2005,28, 2006, the afternoon fixing spot price of silver on the London market, (the "London Spot")or London Spot, was US$6.828.83 per ounce and US$6.9812.56 per ounce, respectively.

Impact of Government Regulation

The Company'sOur and Yanacocha's activities in Peru depend on mining concessions for exploration, and development (hereafter referredwhich we refer to as "mining concessions")mining concessions, being obtained from the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines, ("MEM"),or MEM, in theour case, of the Company, and through the assignment of concessions granted to a related entity by the Peruvian government, in the case of Yanacocha. In addition, the Company'sour and Yanacocha's activities in Peru depend on provisional permits, obtained from the MEM, for exploration and/or development rights of the area of the claim, (hereafter referredwhich we refer to as "provisionalprovisional permits," and together with mining concessions, hereafter referred to as "mining rights"),mining rights, and/or processing concessions, obtained from the MEM, for treatment of mining ores, (hereafter referred to as "processing concessions"),or processing concessions, as well as compliance by the Companyus and Yanacocha with certain agreements entered into with the Peruvian government. Under Peru's current legal and regulatory regime, the Co mpany'sour mining rights have an indefinite term and Yanacocha's assigned mining rights have a term of 20 years, contingent upon payment ofo f the annual concession fee for each mining right, with an option to renew for an additional term of 20 years. The mining rights are maintained by meeting a minimum annual level of production or investment and by the annual payment of a concession fee. A fine is payable for the years in which minimum production or investment requirements are not met. In addition if, in any year, the concession fee is not paid, payment may be made the following year within the term provided for making such payment. Any payment made will be applied to the prior year if such prior year was not paid. Failure to pay such concession fees or fines for two consecutive years could result in the loss of one or more of the mining rights. However, mining and processing concessions will not lapse if the administrative authority failed to issue a resolution declaring the termination of the concession withi nwithin the first five years following the date on which such payment failure occurred. The Company'sOur and Yanacocha's processing concessions enjoy the same duration and tenure as the mining rights, subject to payment of a fee based on nominal capacity for the processing plant. Failure to pay such processing fees or fines for two consecutive years could result in the loss of the processing concessions. The Company is,We are, and Yanacocha has informed the Companyus that Yanacocha is, current in the payment of all amounts due in respect to its mining and processing concessions.

On June 24, 2004, the Peruvian Congress approved Law 28258 - Mining Royalties Law. This law established a mining royalty that owners of mining concessions must pay to the Peruvian government for the exploitation of metallic and non-metallic resources. The mining royalties are calculated on a sliding scale with rates ranging from 1 to 3 percent over the value of mineral concentrates based on international market prices. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Mining Royalties". The CompanyWe made itsour first payment of the mining royalty pursuant to Law 28258 in 2004. Yanacocha was exempt from this payment pursuant to its Mining Law Stabilization Agreements under the General Mining Law with the Peruvian government. There can be no assurance that the Peruvian government will not impose additional mining royalties on the Companyus or Yanacocha in the future or that such mining royalties will not have an adverse effect on the Company'sour or Yanacocha's results of operations or financial condition.cond ition.

Environmental and other Regulatory Matters

The Company'sOur and Yanacocha's exploration, mining, milling, smelting and refining activities are also subject to a number of Peruvian laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. Additional matters subject to regulation include, but are not limited to, concession fees, transportation, production, water use and discharges, power use and generation, use and storage of explosives, surface rights, housing and other facilities for workers, reclamation, taxation, labor standards, mine safety and occupational health.

The Company anticipatesWe anticipate additional laws and regulations will be enacted over time with respect to environmental matters. The development of more stringent environmental protection programs in Peru could impose constraints and additional costs on the Company'sour and Yanacocha's operations and require the Companyus and Yanacocha to make significant capital expenditures in the future. Although the Company believes it iswe believe we are substantially in compliance, and Yanacocha has advised the Companyus that Yanacocha is substantially in compliance, with all applicable environmental regulations, there can be no assurance that future legislative or regulatory developments will not have an adverse effect on theour or Yanacocha's business or results of operations of the Company or Yanacocha.operations. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Environmental Matters" and "-Permits" and "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Regulation, Permitting and Environmental Matters".

Hedging

The Company engagesIn October 2004, our Board of Directors issued a mandate not to enter into new hedging transactions. At December 31, 2005, we were engaged in gold silver and zinc price hedging activities, such as forward sales and put/call options, from derivative contracts executed prior to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in1999. Since 2003, we have been modifying the pricesterms of such metals. Buenaventura is not required to place collateral with respect tocertain derivative instruments in order to qualify them as normal sales contracts. In March 2006, we closed out all our outstanding gold derivative contracts as of December 31, 2005 and there are no margin calls associatedreplaced them with suchnormal sales contracts. Credit risk is minimized by dealing with major financial institutions. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk". The intended effect of hedging transactions is and Note 34 to lock in a minimum sales price for future production at the time of the transactions, thereby reducing the impact on the Company of a future fall in such metals' prices. However, no assurances can be given as to whether, when or at what prices or cost the Company will be able to enter into hedging transactions and whether the Company's hedging activities will effectively protect the Company from adverse consequences of price fluctuations. The effect of some hedgin g transactions will be to eliminate or limit to some extent revenues that the Company would otherwise receive as a result of increases in the price of gold, silver and zinc. A forward sale of gold, for example, would mean the Company would not realize any additional revenues above the gold price specified in the contract. The Company's profitability could be adversely affected if for any reason, its production of gold is unexpectedly interrupted for a significant period of time and as a result it is unable to produce sufficient gold to cover any forward sales commitments it may have made.Financial Statements. No assurance can be given that the Companywe will employ these or other hedging techniques in the future or that these or other hedging techniques, if employed, will be successful or achieve their desired effect.

Yanacocha has generally not engaged in, and is currently not engaged in, gold price hedging activities, such as forward sales or option contracts, to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in the price of gold. No assurance can be given, however, that Yanacocha will not enter into hedging transactions in the future or that such transactions, if entered into, will have the desired effect.

Speculative Nature of Precious Metals Exploration and Development

Precious metals exploration, particularly gold exploration, is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and frequently is unsuccessful. There can be no assurance that the Company'sour or Yanacocha's precious metals exploration efforts will be successful. Once mineralization is discovered, it may take a number of years from the initial phases of drilling before production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable ore reserves through drilling, to determine metallurgical processes to extract the metals from the ore and, in the case of new properties, to construct mining and processing facilities. As a result of these uncertainties, no assurance can be given that the Company'sour or Yanacocha's exploration programs will result in the expansion or replacement of current production with new proven and probable ore reserves.

DevelopmentAdvanced exploration projects have no operating history upon which to base estimates of proven and probable ore reserves and estimates of future cash operating costs. Such estimates are, to a large extent, based upon the interpretation of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques, and feasibility studies which derive estimates of cash operating costs based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, the configuration of the ore body, expected recovery rates of the mineral from the ore, comparable facility and equipment operating costs, anticipated climatic conditions and other factors. As a result, it is possible that actual cash operating costs and economic returns based upon development of proven and probable ore reserves may differ significantly from those originally estimated. Moreover, significant decreases in actual over expected prices may mean reserves, once found, will be uneconomical to produce. It is not unusual in new mining operatio nsoperations to experience unexpected problems during the start-up phase. The Company utilizesOur significant affliliate, Yanacocha, uses US$400 per ounce of gold to calculate its gold reserves; however, we use a three-year average historicfixed price of US$350 per ounce of gold and a three-year average historic price of US$5.256.30 per ounce of silver to calculate itsour proven and probable ore reserves.reserves due to the fact that most of our gold sales contracts consider fixed prices.

Increased Costs Could Affect Profitability

Costs at any particular mining location frequently are subject to variation due to a number of factors, such as changing ore grade, changing metallurgy and revisions to mine plans in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities, such as fuel, electricity and labor. Commodity costs are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable. Reported costs may be affected by changes in accounting standards. A material increase in costs at any significant location could have a significant effect on our profitability.

Capital Intensive Nature of Precious Metals Exploration and Development

Precious metals exploration and development requires substantial capital expenditures for the exploration, extraction, production and processing stages and for machinery, equipment and experienced personnel. There can be no assurance that the Companywe or Yanacocha will generate sufficient cash flow and/or that itwe will have access to sufficient external sources of funds in the form of outside investment or loans to continue exploration and development activities at the same or higher levels than in the past.

Reserves Estimates

The proven and probable ore reserve figures presented in this Annual Report are estimates of the Companyour and Yanacocha,Yanacocha's estimates, and there can be no assurance that the indicated level of recovery of gold, silver and certain other metals will be realized. Reserve estimates may require revision based on actual production experience. Market price fluctuations of gold, silver and these other metals, as well as increased production costs or reduced recovery rates, may render proven and probable ore reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomic to exploit and may ultimately result in a restatement of proven and probable ore reserves. Moreover, short-term operating factors relating to the reserves, such as the processing of different types of ore or ore grades, could adversely affect the Company'sour or Yanacocha's profitability in any particular accounting period. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Property, Plants and Equipment-The Company's Property-Reserves" and "Item 4. Information on the Company-Property,Company - -Property, Plants and Equipment-Yanacocha's Properties-Reserves".

Replacement of Reserves

As the Company produceswe produce gold, silver, zinc and other metals, it depletes itswe deplete our ore reserves for such metals. To maintain production levels, the Companywe must replace depleted reserves by exploiting known ore bodies orand locating new deposits. Success in exploration for gold, silver and the other metals the Company produceswe produce is very uncertain and there is a risk that the Company'sour depletion of reserves will not be off-set by new discoveries.

Industry Risks

The business of mining, smelting and refining gold, silver and other metals is generally subject to a number of risks and hazards, including industrial accidents, labor disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, changes in the regulatory environment, environmental hazards and weather and other natural phenomena such as earthquakes. Such occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mining properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. The CompanyWe and Yanacocha each maintain insurance against risks that are typical in the mining industry in Peru and in amounts that the Companywe and Yanacocha believe to be adequate but which may not provide adequate coverage in certain circumstances. Insurance against certain risks (including certain liabilities for environmental pollution or other hazards as a result of exploration and production) is not generally available to the Companyus or Yanacocha or to other companies within the industry.

Labor Matters

The Company hasWe have not experienced a strike since 1993, which is indicative of the good relations between the Companyus and itsour employees. However, there can be no assurance that this situation will continue and that the Companywe will not experience strikes or other labor-related work stoppages that could have a material adverse effect on itsour operations and and/or operating results in the future. In February 2004, Yanacocha has not experienced strikes and in 2004 entered into its first collective bargaining agreement with Workers' Union of Minera Yanacocha SRL, (the "Union"),or the Union, which was created and registered before the Peruvian Labor Ministry on December 9, 2003. This collective bargaining agreement expires in February 2007. Yanacocha has informed the Companyus that it considers its relations with its employees to be good. However, therea small percentage of Union members engaged in a three-day strike in April 2006 despite the fact that the collective bargaining agreement has not yet expired. The strike did not have any material impact on Yanacocha's operations; nevertheless t here can be no assurance that this situation will continue and that Yanacocha will not experience other strikes or other labor-related work stoppages that could have a material adverse effect on its operations or its operating results. See "Item 6. Directors, Senior Mana gementManagement and Employees-Employees" and "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Employees".

Political and Social Perception

 

The Company'sOur and Yanacocha's exploration development and production activities are potentially subject to political and social risks. Over the past several years, the Companywe and Yanacocha have been the target of local political protests, including community protests at the Company'sour La Zanja project and a blockade of the road in protest of drilling activities at Yanacocha's Cerro Quilish mine. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-History and Development-Joint Venture Exploration Projects-La Zanja" and "Information"Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Legal Proceedings". There can be no assurance that these incidents will not continue, or that similar incidents will not occur, or that the continuation or intensification of community protests would not adversely affect the Company'sour or Yanacocha's exploration development and production activities or the Company'sour or Yanacocha's results of operations or financial condition.

Investment Company Act

The Company ownsWe own a 43.65 percent partnership interest in Yanacocha. This partnership interest may constitute "investment securities" for purposes of the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the "Investmentor the Investment Company Act").Act.

Under the Investment Company Act, an investment company is defined in relevant part to include (i) any company that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and (ii) any company that owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40 percent of such company's total assets (exclusive of certain items) on an unconsolidated basis. Issuers that are investment companies within the meaning of the Investment Company Act, and which do not qualify for an exemption from the provisions of such act, are required to register with the Commission and are subject to substantial regulations with respect to capital structure, operations, transactions with affiliates and other matters. If the Companywe were deemed to be an investment company and did not qualify for an exemption from the provisions of the Investment Company Act, the Companywe would be required to register with t hethe Commission and would be subject to such regulations, which would be unduly burdensome and costly for the Companyus and possibly adversely impact the Company.us.

The CompanyWe received an order from the Commission on April 19, 1996 declaring itus to be primarily engaged in a business other than that of an investment company and, therefore, not an investment company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. The Company intendsWe intend to conduct itsour operations and maintain itsour investments in a manner, and will take appropriate actions as necessary, to ensure itwe will not be deemed to be an investment company in the future. The Commission, however, upon its motion or upon application, may find that the circumstances that gave rise to the issuance of the order no longer exist, and as a result may revoke such order. There can be no assurance that such order will not be revoked.

Factors Relating to Peru

Exposure to Peruvian Political Risk

All of the Company'sour and Yanacocha's operations are conducted in Peru. Accordingly, theour and Yanacocha's business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company and Yanacocha could be affected by changes in economic or other policies of the Peruvian government or other political, regulatory or economic developments in Peru.

During the past several decades, Peru has had a history of political instability that has included military coups and a succession of regimes with differing policies and programs. Past governments have frequently played an interventionist role in the nation's economy and social structure. Among other things, past governments have imposed controls on prices, exchange rates and local and foreign investment as well as on limitations on imports, have restricted the ability of companies to dismiss employees, have expropriated private sector assets (including mining companies) and have prohibited the remittance of profits to foreign investors.

During the 1980s, government policies restricted theour ability, of the Company, among other things, to repatriate funds and import products from abroad. In addition, currency exchange rates were strictly controlled, and all exportsexport sales were required to be deposited in Peru's Banco Central de Reserva, (the "Central Bank"),or Central Bank, where they were exchanged from U.S. Dollars to Peruvian currency at less-than-favorable rates of exchange. These policies generally affected theour results of operations of the Company.operations. Controls on repatriation of funds limited the ability of the Company'sour shareholders to receive dividends outside of Peru, but did not limit the ability of the Company'sour shareholders to receive distributions of earnings in Peru. See "Item 10. Additional Information-Exchange Controls".

In July 1990, Alberto Fujimori was elected president of Peru, and his administration implemented a broad-based reform of Peru's political system, economy and social conditions, aimed at stabilizing the economy, restructuring the national government by reducing bureaucracy, privatizing state-owned companies, promoting private investment, developing and strengthening free markets, institutionalizing democratic representation and enacting programs for the strengthening of basic services related to education, health, housing and infrastructure. As part ofHowever, after Fujimori's program of reform, the Peruvian Congress was dissolved in April 1992, and a democratically elected congressional body was reestablished in November 1992. A new Constitution was enacted and ratified in the fourth quarter of 1993.

In April 1995, Fujimori was electedreelection to a second five-year term of office as provided by the Constitution enacted in 1993. During Fujimori's second term, inflation continued to decrease and GDP increased.

On May 28, 2000, as a result of an election run-off with Alejandro Toledo, a former Peruvian business school professor, Fujimori was reelected to ahis third five-year term of office with approximately 74 percent of the votes counted. After several national and international institutions charged the elections were unfair and political scandals involving several government officials, Fujimori called for new elections to be held in 2001. Amid increasing pressure on Fujimori to resign, on November 19,May 29, 2000, Fujimori resigned his post from Tokyo, Japan, and has not returned to Peru since then.amid increasing social pressure. The Peruvian Congress appointed Valentin Paniagua as interim President. New elections were subsequently held on April 8, 2001 and a run-off election was held on June 3, 2001, in which Alejandro Toledo was elected President.

President Toledo's government has largely retained the economic policies of the previous government, focusing on promoting private investment, privatizing state-owned companies in various sectors including energy, mining and public services.

The political and economic impact of the upcoming Peruvian presidential and congressional elections is uncertain. At the elections held on April 9, 2006, no presidential candidate received the required 50 percent or more of the votes. As a result, a second round election between the top two presidential candidates, Ollanta Humala Tasso from thePartido Union por el Peru, or the UPP, and Alan Garcia Perez of thePartido Alianza Popular Revolucionaria, or APRA, will be held on June 4, 2006. The outcome of these elections as well as the economic policies of the new government are uncertain. Despite the uncertainty of the electoral outcome, the next president will not likely have a majority in Congress.

Risks of Inflation, Reduced Economic Growth and Currency Devaluation

Over the past several decades, Peru has experienced periods of high inflation, slow or negative economic growth and substantial currency devaluation. The inflation rate in Peru, as measured by theIndice de Precios al Consumidor ("IPC"), or IPC, and published by INEI, has fallen from a high of 7,649.7 percent in 1990 to 3.7 percent in 2000, -0.1 percent in 2001, 1.5 percent in 2002, 2.5 percent in 2003, and 3.5 percent in 2004.2004 and 1.5 percent in 2005. The Peruvian currency has been devalued numerous times during the last 20 years. The devaluation rate has decreased from a high of 4,019.3 percent in 1990 to 0.5 percent in 2000, -2.32.3 percent in 2001, 2.0 percent in 2002, -1.51.5 percent in 2003, and -5.25.2 percent in 2004. The Company's2004 and 4.5 percent in 2005. Our revenues and operating expenses are primarily denominated in U.S. Dollars. If inflation in Peru were to increase without a corresponding devaluation of the Nuevo Sol relative to the U.S. Dollar, theour financial position and results of operations, of the Company, and the market price of theour Common Shares and the American Depository Shares, ("ADSs"),or ADSs, could be affected. Although the Peruvian government's stabilization plan has significantly reduced inflation, and the Peruvian economy has experienced strong growth in recent years, there can be no assurance that inflation will not increase from its current level or that such growth will continue in the future at similar rates or at all.

Among the economic circumstances that could lead to a devaluation would be the decline of Peruvian foreign reserves to inadequate levels. Peru's foreign reserves at December 31, 20042005 were US$12.614.1 billion as compared to US$10.212.6 billion at December 31, 2003. There2004. Although actual foreign reserves must be maintained at levels that will allow the succeeding government the ability to manage the Peruvian economy and to assure monetary stability in the near future, there can be no assurance that Peru will be able to maintain adequate foreign reserves to meet its foreign currency denominated obligations, or that Peru will not devalue its currency should its foreign reserves decline. See "Item 3. Key Information-Exchange Rates".

Peru's current account deficit is being funded partially by foreign direct investment. There can be no assurance that foreign direct investment will continue at current levels, particularly if adverse political or economic developments in Peru arise, a development that may also contribute to devaluation pressure.

Deterioration in Economic and Market Conditions in Latin America and Other Emerging Market Countries

The market for securities issued by Peruvian companies is influenced by economic and market conditions in Peru and, to varying degrees, market conditions in other Latin American and emerging market countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, the reaction of investors to developments in one country is likely to cause the capital markets in other countries to fluctuate. For example, political and economic events, such as the crises in Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Brazil and Argentina, have influenced investors' perceptions of risk with regards to Peru. The negative investor reaction to developments in our neighboring countries may adversely affect the market for securities issued by countries in the region, cause foreign investors to decrease the flow of capital into Latin America, and introduce uncertainty about plans for further integration of regional economies.

Exchange and Investment Controls

Peruvian law currently imposes no restrictions on the ability of companies operating in Peru to transfer foreign currency from Peru to other countries, to convert Peruvian currency into foreign currency or foreign currency into Peruvian currency or to remit dividends abroad or on the ability of foreign investors to liquidate their investment and repatriate their capital. Prior to 1991, Peru had restrictive exchange controls and exchange rates. During the latter part of the 1980s, exchange restrictions prevented payment of dividends to the Company'sour shareholders in the United States in U.S. Dollars. Accordingly, should such or similar controls be instituted, dividends paid to holders of Common Shares and, consequently, holders of American Depositary Receipts, ("ADRs"),or ADRs, could be affected. There can be no assurance that the Peruvian government will continue to permit such transfers, remittances or conversion without restriction. See "Item 10. Additional Information-Exchange Controls".

Corporate Disclosure and Accounting Standards

The Company prepares itsWe prepare our financial statements using Peruvian GAAP, which differdiffers in certain material respects from U.S. GAAP. Thus, the presentation of Peruvian financial statements and reported earnings may not be comparable to those companies whose financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See Note 3938 to the Company Financial Statements for a description of the significant differences between Peruvian GAAP and U.S. GAAP, as such differences relate to the Company,us, and Note 4039 for a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of the Company'sour net income and shareholders' equity for the period included therein. In addition, sinceas a foreign private issuer in the Company is not a United States, registrant,we have less intensive reporting requirements and information regarding the Companyus may not be as readily disseminated into the market.

Enforceability of Civil Liabilities

The Company isWe are organized under the laws of Peru. A significant majority of the Company'sour directors and officers reside outside the United States (principally in Peru). All or a substantial portion of our assets or the assets of such persons or the Company are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us or upon such persons or the Company or to enforce against them in federal or state courts in the United States judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. The Company hasWe have been advised by itsour Peruvian counsel, that there is uncertainty as to the enforceability, in original actions in Peruvian courts, of liabilities predicated solely under the United States federal securities laws and as to the enforceability in Peruvian courts of judgments of United States courts obtained in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United Stat esStates federal securities laws.

Factors Relating to the Common Shares and ADSs

Voting Rights; Effective Control by Principal Shareholders

The aggregate percentage of the economic interest of theour outstanding share capital of the Company held by Alberto Benavides de la Quintana, the Company'sour Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer, and certain members of his immediate and extended family and their spouses, (collectively,or the "Benavides Family")Benavides Family, as of April 30, 20052006, was 26.8227.24 percent. Because of the significant ownership interest the Benavides familyFamily holds in the Companycommon shares and because the Investment Shares held by others do not have voting rights, the Benavides Family has the power to elect a significant number of the outstanding directors and has a significant influence over the outcome of substantially all matters to be decided by a vote of shareholders. In addition, under the terms of the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated May 3, 2002, as further amended and restated as of November 12, 2003, among the Company,us, The Bank of New York, as depositary, (the "Depositary"),or the Depositary, and the owners and beneficial owners of ADSs, (the "Amendedor the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement")Agreem ent, relating to the Company's ADRs,our ADSs, if holders of ADRsADSs do not provide the Depositary with timely instructions for the voting of Common Shares represented by such ADRs, the Depositary will be deemed to be instructed to give a person designated by the Company,us, which will likely be Alberto Benavides de la Quintana, a discretionary proxy to vote such shares, unless the Company informswe inform the Depositary that the Company doeswe do not wish such proxy to be given.

Fewer and Less Well Defined Shareholders' Rights

The Company'sOur shareholders have fewer and less well-defined rights under applicable Peruvian law than they might have as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction of the United States or certain other countries.

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

Sales of a substantial number of our shares of the Company by Alberto Benavides de la Quintana and certain other members of the Benavides Family could materially and adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Common Shares and ADSs. There is no contractual restriction on the disposition of shares of the Company'sour share capital by itsour shareholders, including the Benavides Family. Furthermore, under theLey General de Sociedades Peruana (the "Peruvian, or Peruvian Companies Law"),Law, any restriction on the free sale of shares in asociedad anónima abierta(open stock company) such as the Company,we are, is null and void.

Possible Inability of ADS Holders to Exercise Preemptive Rights

Holders of the ADSs are, under Peruvian law, entitled to exercise preemptive rights and accretion rights on the Common Shares underlying the ADSs in the event of any future capital increase by the Companyus unless (x) the increase is approved, expressly stating that the shareholders have no preemptive rights to subscribe and pay for the Shares to be issued in such increase, by holders of Common Shares, holding at least 40 percent of the Common Shares, at a properly called meeting with a proper quorum and (y) the increase is not designed to improve directly or indirectly the shareholding of any shareholder. However, United States holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise through the Depositary for the ADSs the preemptive rights and accretion rights for Common Shares underlying their ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the "Securities Act"),or the Securities Act, is effective with respect to such rights or an exemption from the registration requirement thereunderthereunde r is available. Any such rights offering would have a dilutive effect upon shareholders who are unable or unwilling to exercise their rights. The Company intendsWe intend to evaluate, at the time of any rights offering, the costs and potential liabilities associated with any registration statement as well as the benefits to it of enabling the holders of ADSs to exercise such rights and will then make a decision as to whether to file such a registration statement. Therefore, no assurance can be given that any such registration statement would be filed. To the extent that holders of ADSs are unable to exercise such rights because a registration statement has not been filed and no exemption from such registration statement under the Securities Act is available, the Depositary will, to the extent practicable, sell such holders' preemptive rights or accretion rights and distribute the net proceeds thereof, if any, to the holders of ADSs and such holders' equity interest in the Companyus would be diluted proportionat ely.proportionately. The Depositary has discretiondis cretion to make rights available to holders of ADSs or to dispose of such rights and to make any net proceeds available to such holders. If, by the terms of any rights offering or for any other reason, the Depositary is not able to make such rights or such net proceeds available to any holder of ADSs, the Depositary may allow the rights to lapse.

ITEM 4. Information on the Company

THE COMPANY

History and Development

Overview

Buenaventura isWe are Peru's largest publicly-traded precious metals company. The Company iscompany, and are engaged in the exploration, mining processing, development and explorationprocessing of gold, silver and, to a lesser extent, other metals, in Peru. The CompanyWe currently operates three mines (Julcani,operate the Julcani, Recuperada, Orcopampa and Uchucchacua)Uchucchacua mines and hashave controlling interests in three other mining companies which have controlling interests inoperate the Colquijirca, Antapite, Colquijirca, Ishihuinca Shila and PaulaShila-Paula mines. Effective March 2001, the Companywe temporarily suspended operations and discontinued exploration efforts at the Recuperada mine. In April 2004, the Companywe elected to resume exploration efforts at the Esperanza vein of the Recuperada mine due to an increase in ore reserves as well as the rising price of metals.The Companymetals and in February 2006 we initiated mining operations.In addition, as of January 1, 2005, the operating data from the Paula mine has been consolidated with the operating data from the Shila mine and after such date is referred to herein as the Shila-Paula mine. We also ownsown an electric power transmissiontran smission company and an engineering services consulting company and hashave minority interests in several other mining companies, including a significant ownership interest in Yanacocha, a Peruvian partnership that opera tesoperates South America's largest gold mine.mine, and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., or Cerro Verde, a Peruvian company that operates a copper mine located in the south of Peru. In 2004,2005, the Julcani, Uchucchacua, Orcopampa, Antapite, Colquijirca, Ishihuinca Shila and PaulaShila-Paula mines produced 357,562388,042 ounces of gold, 15,095,56216,429,816 ounces of silver and 70,92569,550 short tons of metallic zinc. Yanacocha produced 3,017,3023,333,088 ounces of gold and 3,479,4354,342,292 ounces of silver. The Company'ssilver and Cerro Verde produced 103,123 short tons of copper. Our equity share of production in 20042005 was 1,642,8121,814,861 ounces of gold, 14,274,45815,377,704 ounces of silver, and 28,21628,154 short tons of metallic zinc and 15,220 short tons of copper, including 1,317,0521,454,893 ounces of gold and 1,518,7731,895,410 ounces of silver for Yanacocha.Yanacocha and 15,066 short tons of copper for Cerro Verde. For theth e year ended December 31, 2004, the Company's2005, our net sales were S/.972.2million.936.5million (US$297.7273.0 million), and itsour net income was S/.685.6.940.9 million (US$208.8274.3 million).

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., asociedad anónima abierta (open stock company) under the laws of Peru,was originally established in 1953 as asociedad anónima (company) under the laws of Peru, and currently operates under the laws of Peru. The Company'sOur registered office is located at Carlos Villarán 790, Santa Catalina, Lima 13, Perú, telephone no. 5-11-419-2538. The Company'sOur Internet Website address is http://www.buenaventura.com. The information on the Company'sour website is not a part of, norand is not incorporated into, this document.

History

During itsour first 25 years, the Company'sour efforts focused on the exploration and development of silver mines. During this period, the Companywe built up itsour principal mines in Peru, commencing with the purchaseacquisition of the Julcani mine in 1953. The CompanyWe commenced exploration of the Orcopampa mine in 1962 and operations in 1965. The CompanyWe began exploring the Uchucchacua mine site in 1960 and, after operating a pilot project in the area in the early 1970s with successful results, built an ore processing plant at the mine site, which began operations in 1975.

Because of political uncertainties in Peru in the mid-1970s, the Companywe explored mining possibilities in other countries in South America, including Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Bolivia and Argentina. Exploration and development began on a small scale at the Toachi mine near Quito, Ecuador, but this project was discontinued in 1981 due to border disputes between Peru and Ecuador. At that time, the Companywe also decided to discontinue itsour exploration outside Peru and to intensify efforts in Peru.

Following a sharp increase in silver prices, which peaked in 1980, the Companywe initiated a program to explore for gold and, to a lesser extent, other metals in Peru to reduce itsour dependence on silver, since the Companywe believed the high price of silver could not be sustained. Faced with declining silver prices throughout the 1980s, the Companywe expanded silver output to reduce its cash flow while at the same time continuing itsour exploration efforts for other metals. Exploration of gold anomalies in the Yanacocha district began in 1983 and an expansion of the Orcopampa mine, (whichwhich had operated since 1967 as a silver-producing mine)mine, to enable the Companyus to developexplore newly-discovered gold veins began in 1984 and was concluded in 1999. In 2002, after an intense exploration program of the Orcompampa mine, gold production was commenced atin the Chipmo vein.area. New gold mining operations commenced at the Ishihuinca mine in the early 1980s and at the Antapite mine in 2001. However, Peru's economic and poli tical crisis during the 1980's, which led to the imposition of exchange controls, restrictions on imports of supplies, lack of capital and international credit and the increasing incidence of terrorism, adversely affected mining companies in Peru, including the Company.

Since the late 1980s, the Company haswe have continued itsour efforts to decrease itsour exposure to silver price fluctuations and hashave pursued a plan to increase its overall precious metals production and production efficiency. The Company hasWe have continued to expand itsour mineral resource basereserves through the implementation of property acquisition development and intensive exploration programs designed to increase itsreserves and production and reserves of gold. As part of this strategy, the Companywe acquired an equity interest in Yanacocha and conducted exploration leading to the discovery of gold mineralization and subsequent production of gold inat the Orcopampa, Shila, Ishihuinca Antapite and otherAntapite mines. These initiatives have transformed the Companyus from primarily a silver producer into primarily a gold producer, based on allocated revenue. In 2004,2005, gold, silver and other metals accounted for 84.2579.59 percent, 10.5410.15 percent and 5.2110.26 percent, respectively, of the Company'sour equity share of production value in itsour consolidated subsidiaries and Yan acocha.Yanacocha.

On January 14, 1992, the Company,we, through itsour 100 percent owned subsidiary, Compañía Minera Condesa S.A. ("Condesa"), or Condesa, together with Newmont Second Capital Corporation, ("or Newmont Second"),Second, a wholly owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining, and Société d'Etudes, de Recherches et d'Exploitations Miniéres, ("Serem"),or Serem, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et D'Etudes Geologiques ("BRGM"),Minières, or BRGM, the geological and mining bureau of the French government, formed Yanacocha to continue exploration and development of the deposits at a mining site in the Cajamarca area. At that time, Yanacocha was 38 percent owned by Newmont Second, 24.7 percent owned by Serem, 32.3 percent owned by Condesa and 5 percent owned by The International Finance Corporation, ("IFC"),or IFC, the branch of the World Bank that promotes private investments. Since then, the Company haswe have increased itsour participation in Yanacocha to 43.65 percent, and Newmont Second has increased its participation in Yanacocha to 51.35 percent,percen t, with IFC continuing to own 5 percent.

In October 2000, the Companywe and Newmont Mining agreed to consolidate theirour properties in Cajamarca, northern Peru, in Yanacocha. Under the consolidation plan and according to agreements signed in December 2000, the Companywe sold several assets to Yanacocha, including assets formerly owned bythe Minas Conga project, the China Linda lime plant, mining rights, aerial land and other machinery and equipment and inventories. See "-Property, Plants and Equipment-Yanacocha's Properties-Operating Properties". The CompanyWe received approximately US$9 million in connection with this sale. Yanacocha and the CompanyWe also entered into an administration agreement with Yanacocha, setting forth that the Companywe would manage the China Linda lime plant until December 18, 2010, for a monthly fee of US$10,000 plus reimbursement of all incurred costs. However, in December 2001, Yanacocha terminated the agreement and the Companywe ceased to manage the China Linda plant. As a result of the termination, the Companywe received a payment of $ US$1,800,000 from Yanacocha.

On June 1, 2005, Cerro Verde conducted a capital increase whereby we subscribed 42,925,975 shares for US$154.8 million, increasing our interest in Cerro Verde from 9.17 percent to 18.21 percent. Phelps Dodge Corporation continues to retain a majority interest in Cerro Verde. See "-Intermediate Holding Companies; Subsidiaries and Equity Participations-Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.". As of December 31, 2005, Cerro Verde was 53.56 percent owned by Cyprus Climax Metals Company, a subsidiary of Phelps Dodge Corporation, 21.0 percent owned by Sumitomo Group and 18.5 percent owned by us.

Redesignation of the Company'sour Shares and ADSs

At aour shareholder meeting of the Company held on April 30, 2002, following special meetings of the Company'sour Series A shareholders and Series B shareholders on the same date, (the "Special Meetings"),or the Special Meetings, amendments to the Company'sourestatutos (the "Company By-laws"), or By-laws, were approved pursuant to the Special Meetings to effect the redesignation of each outstanding Series B Share as one Series A Share and the immediate redesignation thereafter of each Series A Share as one Common Share, (the "Redesignation").or the Redesignation. The Redesignation was effective May 3, 2002. At that date, the Companywe had Common Shares with a nominal par value of S/.4.00 per share and Investment Shares also with a nominal par value of S/.4.00 per share. The Common Shares represent 100 percent of theour outstanding share capital of the Company.capital. The Investment Shares have no voting rights and are not, under Peruvian law and accounting rules, characterized as share capital.

The Company'sOur ADSs have traded on the New York Stock Exchange Inc. (the "New, or the New York Stock Exchange")Exchange, since May 15, 1996. Prior to the Redesignation, each of the Company'sour ADSs represented two Series B Shares. In connection with the Redesignation, the Companywe submitted a technical original listing application to the New York Stock Exchange dated April 25, 2002, (the "Application")or the Application, for the redesignation of the Company'sour ADSs representing non-voting Class B Shares to ADSs representing voting Common Shares and the reservation of additional ADSs issuable upon redesignation of Class B Shares as Class A Shares and immediate redesignation thereafter of Class A Shares as Common Shares. The New York Stock Exchange approved the Application prior to the date of Redesignation and on May 3, 2002, each of the Company'sour ADSs has represented two Common Shares. From and afterSince that date, the Company haswe have had Common Shares with a nominal par value of S/.4.00 per share. On November 3, 2003, the Companywe submitted a supplemental listing application to the New York Stock Exchange to modify theth e ratio of the Company'sour ADSs, and on November 12, 2003, the Company'sour ratio of Common Shares per ADSs was modified from two Common Shares per ADS to one Common Share per ADS.

Recent Developments

Effective December 30, 2005 and January 2, 2006, we acquired 50 percent and 25 percent, respectively, of the capital stock of Minas Poracota S.A., or Minas Poracota, for a purchase price of US$4.5 million. According to the shareholders agreement we executed with Teck Cominco Perú S.A., or Teck Cominco, if a preliminary study to be carried out by us and Teck Cominco indicates a probability of gold production that is greater than 300,000 ounces per year, Teck Cominco will have the right to increase its equity interest in Minas Poracota to 50 percent and operate the project. Teck Cominco will prepare a feasibility study with a production of 300,000 ounces of gold. However, if the preliminary study indicates that gold production is less than 300,000 ounces per year, we have the option to purchase the remaining 25 percent of the capital stock of Minas Poracota for US$2.25 million.

On March 15, 2005,the Company executed a joint venture agreementMay 3, 2006, we terminated our agreements with Río Narcea Gold Mines, S.A., Naraval Gold S.R.L. and Río Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (collectively "Grupo RN"), or Grupo RN, dated March 15, 2004, whereby the Company willwe agreed to acquire a 51 percent equity interest in the Santa Marina exploration project, which is located 2two kilometers north of the El Valle mine on the Río Narcea gold belt in Asturias, Spain, through itsour 100 percentpercent-owned subsidiary Minera Santa Marina del Norte S.L. ("Santa Marina"). The Santa Marina project is operated by, or Santa Marina. The Company has agreed, pursuant to the joint venture agreement, to invest 2,200,000 Euros by March 15, 2007 to develop the Santa Marina project. Upon such investment, Grupo RN will transfer certain mining rights with respect to the Santa Marina exploration project in exchange for a 49 percent interest in Santa Marina. In addition, upon receipt of notice by Grupo RN affirming the completion of the Company's initial investment, the Compa ny has a three month option to increase their equity interest in Santa Marina to 70 percent for an additional investment of 2,400,000 Euros over a two year period from such exercise.

On March 16, 2005, the Company, the Sumitomo Group, Phelps Dodge Corporation, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Cyprus Metals Company, Cyprus Climax Metals Company and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. ("Cerro Verde") entered into an agreement whereby, subject to certain closing conditions, the Company agreed to increase its ownership interest in Cerro Verde up to 20 percent and the Sumitomo Group agreed to acquire an ownership interest in Cerro Verde of between 21 and 25 percent in connection with a US$850 million expansion of the Cerro Verde copper operations to mine a primary sulfide ore body. Phelps Dodge will retain a majority interest in Cerro Verde. Cerro Verde intends to effect the increase of the Company's and the Sumitomo Group's ownership interests pursuant to a capital increase. See "-Intermediate Holding Companies; Subsidiaries and Equity Participations-Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.".

Business Strategy

The Company'sOur strategy is to strengthen itsour position as one of Peru's leading gold and silver mining companies by expanding itsour reserves and production. The Company isWe are currently engaged in an active exploration and mine development program and participatesparticipate in several joint ventures.mining exploration projects with Newmont, Minera ABX Exploraciones S.A., or Barrick, Gold Fields Peru S.A., or Gold Fields, Southern Copper Corporation, or SCC, and Teck Cominco. Further, the Company seekswe seek to increase the efficiency and capacity of itsour mining operations. The Company isWe are aware of itsour social and environmental responsibilities and aimsaim to excel in the prevention, mitigation and rehabilitation of mining-related disturbances.

Maintaining an Active Exploration Program

The Company viewsWe view an active exploration program as itsour primary means to obtain new reserves. As of April 30, 2005,May 29, 2006, through an intensive exploration program, the Company holds,we hold, either directly or in conjunction with joint ventureexploration partners, 368,031480,530 hectares of mining rights, excluding an additional 151,742338,864 hectares in mining properties which consolidate production units, making itus a major holder of mining rights in Peru.

During 2004 the Company2005 we spent approximately US$14.4820.97 million primarily on "greenfield" and US$6.30 million on "brownfield" mining exploration-related investments in Peru, concentratingPeru. Our "greenfield" investments focused on the following exploration and development of precious metals deposits in the following mining projects: El Faique (previously known as El Papayo), Volcanicos Oyotun, Los Pircos, La Zanja, Mesa de Plata, Tantahuatay, Marcapunta,Cordillera Oriental, Pampa Andino, Aguas Verdes, Jatun Orcco, Huancavelica, JVMinasnioc, Cofradia, Puquio, Trapiche, Poracota, Soras, Altiplano Perú, Arenizo, CruceroSanta Marina and Patagonia.Argentina. In 2005, the Company intends2006, we intend to concentrate on the El Faique, Los Pircos, La Zanja, Mesa de Plata, Tantahuatay, Volcánicos Oyotún, Cordillera Orient al,Oriental, Pampa Andino, Huancavelica, Cofradía,Tinyaclla, El Milagro, Minasnioc, JV Puquio,Hueso Sur, Trapiche, Poracota, Soras, Arenizo, Altiplano Bolivia,and Argentina and Santa Marina exploration projects.projects with an approved budget of US$21.0 million. The 2004 explorations2005 exploration program was financed by internal funds as well as a US$5.422.5 million contribution by Newmont Minera ABX Exploraciones S.A. ("ABX")Peru S.R.L., Southern Peru Copper Corporation ("SPCC"),SPCC, Gold Fields Peru S.A. ("Gold Fields") and Minera Peñoles de Peru S.A. ("S .A., or Peñoles").oles.Our "brownfield" investments focused on the following exploration projects: Pozo Rico, Mallay, Anamaray, Layo and Shila. In 2006 we intend to invest US$11.8 million in the Pozo Rico, Mallay, Anamaray, Layo, Umachulco-Manto N and Shila brownfields exploration projects.

Participation in Joint VenturesMining Exploration Agreements

In addition to managing and operating precious metals mines, Buenaventura participateswe participate in mining exploration joint venturesagreements with mining partners to reduce risks, gain exposure to new technologies support high mine development costs and diversify revenues to include other metals. See "-Business Overview-Exploration". The Company believesWe believe that maintaining itsour focus on mining operations complements its joint-ventureour partnership strategy because the engineering and geological expertise gained from such operations enhances the Company'sour ability to participate in and contribute to those joint-venture projects that offer the greatest potential.

The Company engages in gold, silver and zinc price hedging activities, such as forward sales and option contracts, to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in the prices of such metals. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" and "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Factors Relating to the Company-Hedging".projects.

Capital Expenditures

The Company'sOur capital expenditures in the past three years have related principally to the acquisition of new assets,mining properties, increasing our participation in the Cerro Verde mine, construction of new facilities and renewal of plant and equipment. Capital expenditures relating to exploration and development are not included herein and are discussed separately in "-Business Overview-Exploration". Set forth below is information concerning capital expenditures incurred by the Companyus in respect toof each of itsour principal operating mines and by category of expenditure:

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2002

2003

2004

2003

2004

2005

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Julcani

Julcani

US$    45

US$    33

US$    22

US$    33

US$    22

US$   133

Uchucchacua

Uchucchacua

3,123

3,122

2,418

3,122

2,418

6,610

Orcopampa

Orcopampa

6,126

9,272

6,391

9,272

6,391

3,122

Recuperada

Recuperada

-

-

94

-

94

122

Ishihuinca

Ishihuinca

184

362

641

362

641

229

Shila

Shila

814

798

39

798

39

427*

Paula

Paula

99

126

579

126

579

-

Huallanca

-

_

 

Colquijirca

Colquijirca

1,207

998

4,328

998

4,328

3,222

Antapite

Antapite

3,574

2,038

5,496

2,038

5,496

899

Conenhua

Conenhua

1,784

92

7,624

92

7,624

137

Total

Total

US$16,956

US$16,841

US$27,632

US$16,841

US$27,632

US$14,904***

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2002

2003

2004

2003

2004

2005

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Machinery and equipment

US$2,740

1,880

8,756

US$    1,880

US$    8,756

US$    1,796

Infrastructure

5,559

1,951

3,710

1,951

3,710

4,836

Mining

3,774

2,005

3,073

2,005

3,073

2,609

Milling*

1,762

4,879

10,208

Milling**

4,879

10,208

4,713

Transportation

219

152

339

152

339

200

Communications

175

196

427

196

427

136

Environmental

2,063

5,264

903

5,264

903

22

Other

664

514

215

514

215

532

Total

US$16,956

US$16,841

US$27,632

US$16,841

US$27,632

US$14,904***

 

 

 

 

___________________

* As of January 1, 2005, Paula's operating data has been consolidated with Shila's operating data.

** Includes capital expenditures ofUS$3.1 million in 2003 and US$3.6 million in 2004 for the Orcopampa tailing dam construction and US$3.0 million in 2004 for the Antapite tailing dam construction.

***Excludes US$4.5 million of goodwill incurred in connection with the acquisition of shares of El Brocal and Poracota.

The CompanyWe financed itsour capital expenditures in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 with internally-generated funds and borrowings under itsour lines of credit. Seecredit.See Notes 1715 and 2018 to the Company Financial Statements.

The Company hasWe have budgeted approximately US$2330.4 million and US$1039.9 million for capital expenditures in 20052006 and 2006,2007, respectively. Exploration expenses in non-operating units are expected to be US$16.533.9 million and US$16.528.0 million in 20052006 and 2006,2007, respectively. To fund itsour planned capital expenditures program, the Company planswe plan to use internally-generated funds. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-The Company-Liquidity and Capital Resources".

The Company'sOur ongoing projects include (i)include(i) a complementary facility of the construction of a new cyanidation plant at the Uchucchacua mining unitto treat oxide ore, at an estimated cost of US$8.83.6 million and the deepening of the Master Shaft from level 4060 to level 3900 which will lead to deepening of the Carmen and Socorro mines, at an expected investment of US$10.6 million at Uchucchacua and (ii) the extension of the Nazareno and Prometida area drilling projectsramps and the construction of an auxiliary shaft to provide access to 0.7 million ounces of goldimprove ventilation and ore transport at lower levels of the Prosperidad, Lucy Piso, Prometida and Nazareno veins at an estimated cost of US$8.7 million. The significant increase inOrcopampa.

Our capital expenditures forwere lower in 2005 than in 2004 was mainly due to an investment of US$7.6 million for the construction of the tailing dam at Antapite and the Callalli-Ares transmission line US$3.6 million for the construction of the Orcopampa tailing dam and US$3.0 million for the construction of the Antapite tailing dam.by Conenhua in 2004.

The CompanyWe continuously evaluatesevaluate opportunities to expand itsour business within Peru, as well as in other countries as opportunities arise, and expectsexpect to continue to do so in the future. The CompanyWe may in the future decide to acquire part or all of the equity of, or undertake joint ventures or other transactions with, other companies involved in the same business as the Companyus or in related other businesses. However, there can be no assurance that the Companywe will decide to pursue any such new activity or transaction.

Business Overview

Production

The CompanyWe principally producesproduce refined gold and different types of metal concentrates that it distributeswe distribute and sellssell internationally, including silver-lead concentrate, silver-gold concentrate, zinc concentrate and lead-gold-copper concentrate. The following table sets forth the production of the Antapite, Julcani, Uchucchacua, Orcopampa, Recuperada (which temporarily ceasedresumed operations effective March 2001)in April 2004), Ishihuinca, Paula Huallanca (which was sold in March 30, 2002)(as of January 1, 2005, Paula's operating data has been consolidated with Shila's operating data), Colquijirca and Shilamines by type of product for the last three years, calculated in each case on the basis of 100 percent of the applicable mine's production.

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2002

2003

2004

2003

2004

2005

Gold (oz.)(1)

277,490

319,427

357,562

319,427

357,562

388,042

Silver (oz.)

13,346,374

13,813,658

15,095,562

13,813,658

15,095,562

16,429,816

Zinc (ST)(2)

72,147

67,949

70,925

67,949

70,925

69,550

Lead (ST)

27,433

29,209

35,965

29,209

35,965

35,619

Copper (ST)

360

298

169

298

169

280

___________

(1) Throughout this Annual Report, "oz" refers to troy ounces of a fineness of 999.9 parts per 1,000, equal to 31.0134 grams.

(2) Throughout this Annual Report, "ST" refers to short tons, each weighing 2,000avoirdupois pounds.

Exploration

The Company viewsWe view exploration as itsour primary means of generating growth value for shareholders and typically maintainsmaintain a portfolio of active exploration projects at various stages of exploration for mineral resources in Peru,Peru. In addition, we occasionally operate exploration projects in Argentina, Bolivia, Mexicoand Spain at various stages of investigation. The CompanySpain. We currently holds,hold, either directly or in conjunction with joint ventureexploration partners, 368,031480,530 hectares of mining rights as part of itsour exploration program; this areafigure excludes an additional 151,742338,864 hectares in mining properties which consolidateare involved in consolidating production units. The CompanyWe invested approximately US$14.4820.97 million in exploration for mineral resourcesMineralized Material not in Reserve, or NRM, during 2004,2005, including 24,45519,351 meters of exploratory diamond drilling primarilyand 3,404 meters of exploratory underground workings in the La Zanja, Los Pircos, Pampa Andino, Jatun Orcco, Arenizo, Poracota, Soras, Minasnioc, Cofradia and Chilacocha prospects.Oyotunprojects. In addition, the joint ventureour exploration partners invested US$5.422.5 million in 11,619 meters of exploratory diamond drilling in the Puquio, Aguas Verdes, Marcapunta, IncapachaTantahuatay and MinasniocLa Zanja prospects.

Relying on itsour own field reconnaissance of satellite image color anomalies and in light of geochemical data recently published by the Instituto Geológico Minero y Metalúrgico, ("INGEMMET"), the Company hasor INGEMMET, we have shifted itsour exploration focus inside Peru to the central eastern Andean Region called Cordillera Oriental. As a result, while the Company continueswe continue exploration in Cajamarca, Cerro de Pasco and Huancavelica as its high-priorityour highest-priority target regions, it hasduring 2005 we renewed prospecting and exploration efforts during 2004 for gold and silver in Ayacucho, for gold and copper in Apurímac and Cusco, for copper, gold and zinc in Piura, Lambayeque and La Libertdad,Libertad,and for gold in Junin.The Company isJunin.We are also exploring for precious metal epithermal deposits in the Altiplano region in southeastern Peru and continuescontinue evaluating prospects in Mexico, Bolivia, Argentina and Spain.

In 2005 the Company expects2006, we expect to invest a minimum of approximately US$15.033.9 million respectively, in explorationgreenfield and developmentbrownfield exploration activities. All exploration and development programs at the Company'sour principal mines are separateindividual and expressed as part of mine cost structure. Exploration and development expenditures include all of the costs associated with manpower and activities such as geologists, contractors, engineering, drilling equipment, metallurgical testing and economic feasibility studies. Management for the exploration division prepares programs and budgets for individual projects each year and we allocate, subject to board approval, the Company allocates, through approval of the board, anproper amount to finance suchfor each particular exploration and development activities in those projectsactivity considered worthwhile. In light of the nature of mining exploration and in order to maintain flexibility to take advantage of opportunities, the Company allocateswe allocate budgeted amounts by property or project only in the case of high geological prospectivityexpectation as de cideddecided by management. The Companymanagement.We also allocatesallocate non-budgeted amounts over the course of the year to new projects based on the Company'sour needs and itsour geologists' periodic evaluations of the progress of each opportunity and its potential for development.further exploration activities.

An integral part of the Company'sour exploration program is the participation in joint venturesmining exploration agreements with affiliates of experienced mining companies, including Newmont Peru ABX,S.R.L., Barrick, SPCC, Teck Cominco, Metals Ltd. ("TCL"), Gold Fields and Peñoles, as well as certain of their affiliates.oles. The benefits of these joint venturesexploration projects include greater investment in the exploration of the Company'sour mining rights from the funds contributed by the partners, access to the assets of the partners without the costs and risks of outright acquisition, increased exposure to new exploration technologies and expansion of knowledge and sharing of experiences of the Company's management, geologists and engineers. In these mining exploration joint ventures, the Companyagreements, we may be either the designated operator, an equity participant, the manager or a combination of these and other functions. The Company doesWe do not generally conduct significant research and development activities other than investments in exploration as described herein. Funding has provi dedWe have provided funding for university-based research and training of geological staff, with the objective of improving the appraisal of the Company'sour properties, presently carried out at the Mineral Deposit Research Unit, University of British Columbia, with research on mineral zoning at Uchucchacua, and at the Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, with research on metallogenetic fertility of Circumpacific magmas, and at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, with research on regional distribution of coopercopper deposits in northern Peru. In addition, we have three geologists studying to receive their M.Sc.degree in the Red DESIR program promoted by the Universidad Politecnica de Madrid in Lima, which is funded by the European Union and supported by the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos and the Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria.

The following table lists the Company'sour current greenfield exploration projects, itsour effective participation in each project, itsour partners with respect to each project, the total hectares as of April 30, 2005,May 8, 2006, observed mineralization of each project and the total exploration expenditures (in millions of US$) during 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005.

Exploration

Projects(1)(2)

Company's
Effective
Participation

Principal Partners

Property
Hectares

Observed

Mineralization

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2002

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2003

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2004

Company's
Effective
Participation

PrincipalPartners

Property
Hectares

Observed

Mineralization

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2003

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2004

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2005

Joint Venture Projects:

at December 31, 2004

 

Total

BVN'S

Total

BVN'S

Total

BVN'S

Joint Exploration Projects:

at December 31, 2005

 

Total

BVN'S

Total

BVN'S

Total

BVN'S

Colquirrumi

99.99%

Espro, Col

11,728

Silver, zinc & lead

1.50

1.11

1.55

1.14

0.38

99.99%

Espro, Col

11,728

Silver, zinc & lead

1.55

1.14

0.38

0.38

0.21

0.21

La Zanja(3)

53.06%

Newmont

32,500

Gold, copper

0.38

0.21

3.47

1.84

5.84

3.10

53.06%

Newmont

32,070

Gold & copper

3.47

1.84

5.84

3.10

2.64

1.40

Lancones(4)

100.00%

None

4,600

Copper, gold

0.09

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.00

100.00%

None

0

Copper & gold

0.02

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Los Pircos(5)

100.00%

None

11,808

Gold & silver

0.40

0.10

1.73

0.00

0.38

100.00%

None

11,808

Gold & silver

1.73

0.00

0.38

0.38

0.99

0.99

Minasnioc(6)

60.00%

ABX

23,600

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

1.18

0.00

0.95

0.21

60.00%

Barrick

23,600

Gold & silver

1.18

0.00

0.95

0.21

0.86

0.86

Patagonia(7)

0.00%

None

0

Gold

0.47

0.23

1.41

0.74

0.45

0.00%

None

0

Gold & silver

1.41

0.74

0.45

0.45

0.00

0.00

Poracota(8)

0.00%

SWG, TCL

6,674

Gold & silver

0.28

0.28

1.51

2.45

0.00%

SWG, Teck Cominco

6,674

Gold

1.51

2.45

2.45

7.70

7.70

Puquio

40.00%

Gold Fields

18,073

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.37

0.05

1.03

0.12

40.00%

Gold Fields

0

Gold & silver

0.37

0.05

1.03

0.12

0.70

0.20

Salpo

0.00%

None

0

Gold & silver

0.30

0.30

1.74

0.00

0.00%

None

0

Gold & silver

1.74

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Samana

50.00%

Newmont

7,300

Gold

0.15

0.15

0.20

0.09

50.00%

Newmont

7,300

Gold & silver

0.20

0.09

0.09

0.00

0.00

Santa Marina

51.00%

Rio Narcea

0

Gold & copper

0.00

0.02

0.02

0.25

0.25

Aguas Verdes

20.00%

Peñoles

3,800

Gold & copper

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.71

0.15

20.00%

Peñoles

3,800

Copper

0.00

0.71

0.15

0.02

0.01

Tantahuatay

40.00%

SPCC, ESPRO

17,722

Gold & copper

1.12

0.45

0.52

1.08

0.61

40.00%

SPCC, ESPRO

17,722

Gold & copper

0.52

1.08

0.61

1.55

0.62

Company's Projects:

Company's Projects:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company's Projects:

 

 

 

 

 

Ccarhuarazo

100.00%

None

0

Silver & gold

0.54

0.54

0.00

0.00

Cofradia

100.00%

None

20,200

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.52

0.52

Cordillera Oriental

100.00%

None

4,900

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.13

0.13

El Faique

100.00%

None

87,574

Copper, zinc & gold

0.00

0.00

1.62

1.62

Huancavelica

100.00%

None

47,068

Gold, silver, zinc

0.49

0.49

1.06

0.47

100.00%

None

48,915

Lead, silver & zinc

1.06

0.47

0.47

0.56

0.56

Pampa Andino

100.00%

None

18,900

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.28

1.08

100.00%

None

18,900

Gold & silver

0.28

1.08

1.08

1.35

1.35

Jatun Orco

100.00%

None

20,700

Gold & silver

0.69

0.69

1.13

1.18

Altiplano Peru (Franja Sur)

100.00%

None

36,587

Gold & silver

0.53

0.53

0.64

0.38

Hatun Orco

100.00%

None

20,700

Gold & silver

1.13

1.18

1.18

0.08

0.08

Altiplano Peru

100.00%

None

7,200

Gold & silver

0.64

0.38

0.38

0.19

0.19

Soras

100.00%

None

23,167

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.14

100.00%

None

22,323

Gold, silver & copper

0.00

0.14

0.14

0.42

0.42

Arenizo

*

None

3,150

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.30

Trapiche

100.00%

None

5,600

Copper & molybdenum

0.00

0.04

0.04

0.91

0.91

Oyotun

100.00%

None

11,400

Zinc, copper & silver

0.00

0.04

0.04

0.24

0.24

Arenizo(11)

78.04%

None

2,916

Gold

0.00

1.30

1.30

1.03

1.03

Cedimin(9)

100.00%

None

55,186

Gold, silver, copper

2.57

2.57

2.73

0.31

100.00%

None

51,649

Gold, silver & copper

2.73

0.31

0.31

0.00

0.00

Others(10)

100.00%

None

25,468

Various

0.92

0.92

2.81

1.45

1.68

1.68

100.00%

None

36,053

Various

2.81

1.45

1.62

1.62

1.68

1.68

 

 

368,031

 

10.43

8.59

22.41

15.10

19.90

14.48

 

 

453,032

 

22.35

15.04

19.94

14.52

23.65

20.97

_________________

(1) The table does not include projects abandoned by the Company,us, consolidated mining units or those placed on hold prior to 2003.

(2) In addition to these projects, the Company continueswe continue to conduct exploration at all of itsour operating mines and itsour subsidiaries.

(3) AtOn December 31, 2003, Newmont Peru's interest in the project was diluted to 46.94 percent.

(4) AtOn March 11, 2004, BHP-B decided to withdraw from the project.

(5) AtOn March 25, 2004, Meridian Peru SAC decided to withdraw from the project.

(6) The Company isWe are in the process of increasing itsour interest in the project, thereby diluting ABX'sBarrick's interest.

(7) In August 2004, the Companywe withdrew from the project.

(8) The Company hasWe have exercised an option to acquire a 50 percent interest at the first stagefrom Southwestern Gold and an additional 25 percent from Teck Cominco in the project upon the fulfillment of certain conditions.project. See "―Recent Developments."

(9) Includes Mesa de Plata, Crucero, Leonor and others.others (excludes Shila-Paula).

(10) Includes Generative Exploration, Marcapunta, Estrella del Norteexploration in new areas, Hueso Sur, Tinyaclla, El Milagro, Incapacha, Titanica and others.

*(11) The Arenizo project is owned by Inminsur, which is 78.04 percent owned by the Companyus and 21.96 percent owned by Brandon Properties Inc., a Panamanian corporation.

The following table lists our current brownfield exploration projects, our effective participation in each project, the total hectares as of May 8, 2006, observed mineralization of each project and the total exploration expenditures (in millions of US$) during 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Exploration

Projects

Company's
Effective
Participation

PrincipalPartners

Property
Hectares

Observed

Mineralization

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2003

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2004

Total Exploration

Expenditures During

2005

Brownfield Projects:

at December 31, 2005

 

Total

BVN'S

Total

BVN'S

Total

BVN'S

Pozo Rico

100.00%

None

3,377

Silver, lead & zinc

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.48

2.48

Anamaray

100.00%

None

6,952

Zinc, lead & silver

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.24

Mallay

100.00%

None

2,250

Silver, lead & zinc

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.63

0.63

Layo

100.00%

None

737

Gold, silver & copper

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.23

2.23

Umachulco - Manto N

100.00%

None

474

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Shila-Paula

100.00%

None

13,708

Gold & silver

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.77

0.77

 

 

 

27,498

 

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

6.35

6.35

The following is a brief summary of current greenfield and brownfield exploration activities conducted by the Companyus directly and through joint venturesexploration agreements that are believed to represent the best prospects for the discovery of new reserves. There can be no assurance, however, that any of the Company'sour current exploration projects will result in viable mineral production or that any of the mineralization identified to date will ultimately result in an increase in the Company'sour ore reserves. Non-reserve mineralization or mineral resources as indicated by diamond drilling havehas been included in the Company'sour 2005 Annual Report 2004 from the Los Pircos, La Zanja, Tantahuatay, Marcapunta, JatunHatun Orcco, Pampa Andino and Poracota exploration projects.projects.Set forth below is a map of all our exploration activities in Peru as of December 31, 2005:

Joint Venture

Greenfield Exploration Projects

Colquirrumi. The Colquirrumi, project, a silver, zinc and lead project, is wholly owned by Compañía Minera Colquirrumi S.A. ("Colquirrumi")., or Colquirrumi. Consisting of 11,728 hectares, the project is located in the Hualgayoc district, Cajamarca region, and commenced operations in March 1973 with mining and drillingmilling for zinc and lead ore. Since 1991, the project has engaged in astopped mining and mineral exploration program.programs. On April 20, 2004, a capital increase, through the creation of Series A Common Shares and Series B Common Shares, was authorized at an extraordinary meeting of shareholders.shareholders meeting. The Series A Common Shares and Series B Common Shares will receive 90 percent and 10 percent, respectively, of the profits or losses of the Colquirrumi.As of May 28, 2004, the Company iswe are the sole shareholder of the Series A Common Shares and holdshold a 99.99 percent interest in Colquirrumi. On February 24, 2005, the Company executed a joint venturewe signed an agreement with Gold Fields to explore the Hualgayoc district, including cer taincertain areas within the ColquirrumiColquirrum i project. During 2005, Gold Fields invested US$206,952 to drill 2,474 meters in eight holes. Low grade copper-gold mineralization of porphyry style was found in the Cerro Jesus area. In 2006, we plan to invest US$1.5 million in 2,040 meters of underground workings to generate silver, lead and zinc reserves. In addition, Gold Fields plans to continue superficial exploration efforts centered on porphyry gold-copper targets, including 6,000 meters of diamond drilling in four targets for a budget of US$1.5 million.

La Zanja. Sociedad Minera Coshuro S.A. ("Coshuro")La Zanja S.R.L., or La Zanja, controls 23,904 hectares and the Company controls 8,59632,070 hectares of mineralized ground in the La Zanja project, which is located 35 kilometers north-west of Cajamarca.Cajamarca city. Originally, the La Zanja project was part of the Northern Peru joint venturemining exploration project, which was 35 percent owned by the Companyus and 65 percent owned by Newmont Peru. The CompanyWe executed a carve-out agreement with Newmont Peru on August 1, 2000, providing for the eventual dilution of Newmont Peru's interest in the project. The project, which is operated by the Company,us, consists of the San Pedro Sur and Pampa Verde superficial gold and silver oxide deposits, amenable to low-strip open pits and heap-leach operation. Reserves are drill proven, indicated and inferred atNRM is 18.8 million metric tons with an average grade of 1.1 grams per ton of gold per ton. The Company has not yet testedgold. We have started to test for deep oxide nor sulfide ore potential in other prospects within the property. In 2002, the Company advanced in the acquisition of 115 hectares in surface rights and also performed large column tests to prove amenability to cyanide leaching in heaps. During 2003, the Companywe acquired an additional 910 hectares inof surface rights, conducted an airborne electromagnetic survey of 30,000 hectares , and conducted a drilling campaign at the Pampa Verde oxide-gold deposit, the Alcaparrosa prospect and the San Pedro Norte deposit. During 2004, the Companywe invested US$5.8 million in the La Zanja project to conduct metallurgical and feasibility studies, to drill 4,504 meters at the Pampa Verde deposit, 2,933 meters at the Turmalina prospect, 1,113 meters at the Campana prospect, 1,194 meters at the San Pedro Sur deposit, 458 meters at the Pampa Verde Sur prospect and 190 meters at the C.C' Buitre prospect, and to conduct 3,268 meters of sterilization drilling in the Pampa Bramadero area with mineralization outarea. As of reserves indicated at 18.1 million of metric tons with an average grade of 1.1 grams of gold per ton. As o f December 31, 2004, the Company owned2005, we own a 53.06 percent interest in La Zanja and Newmont Peru's interest was diluted to 46.94 percent. Newmont Peru elected to maintain a 46.94 percent interest in La Zanja for 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005. On November 16, 2004, during a community protest at the La Zanja project, a warehouse was set on fire, which resulted in the loss of 25 km of drill cores worth US$150,000 that were stored in the warehouse. As a result, in 2005 we downgraded r eserves to NRM. In addition, we invested a total of US$2.6 million to address social issues and to conduct 18,050 meters of geophysical surveys and to drill 1,674 meters at the Cerro La Zanja deep sulfide prospect. We are drill-testing a transition zone between a porphyry copper to an epithermal gold system. In 2005, surface rock sampling at the Turmalina prospect identified a new oxide-related gold occurrence with an average content of 0.42 grams per ton of gold. In 2006, we plan to invest US$5.1 million on a 8,200-meter drilling campaign at the deep copper-gold sulfide deposit at the Cerro La Zanja prospect and a 3,000-meter drilling campaign at the superficial oxide gold Turmalina prospect.

Lancones. The Lancones project was a joint venture which ismining exploration project that was 40 percent owned by Cía. Minera Totoral S.A. (", or Minera Totoral")Totoral, and 60 percent owned by BHP BILLITON World Exploration Inc. ("BHP-B"). Consisting of approximately 4,600 hectares of mineralized land, the, or BHP-B. The project was located in northern Peru and southern Ecuador. At March 11, 2004,BHP-B decided not to pursue further exploration work in the Lancones project and terminated the mining exploration agreement. We have decided not to terminate the joint venture agreement. The Company did not developconduct further exploration efforts in the Lancones project in 2004.area and to abandon the mining properties.

Los Pircos. The Los Pircos project was a joint venturemining exploration project with Meridian Gold Company, ("MDG").or MDG. Consisting of 11,808 hectares, the project is located east of Chiclayo in the Western Cordillera of Cajamarca, approximately 690 kilometers northwest of the city of Lima. On March 25, 2004 MDG withdrew from project and, since that time, the Company has operated the project with the primary objective of exploring and developing precious metal veins of epithermal character. To date, the Company has located, mapped and sampled five principal veins, which have shown strong anomalous gold and silver values. The principal vein, the Diana vein, has a central section of 380 meters with average widths of 2.10 meters and grades of 8 grams of gold per ton and 300 grams of silver per ton. First pass drilling with a total 3,566 meters in 2002 over the Diana vein system indicated resources of 203,680 metric tons at 18.3 grams per ton of gold and 17.4 ounces per ton of silver in veins with an average thickne ss of 2 meters. During 2003, MDG conducted 5,073 meters of diamond drilling of the Diana, Maribel, Juana Sofia, Milagros, Andrea and Rosa Victoria veins and Lucero area, and an 18.5 kilometers18.5-kilometer electromagnetic survey of the Los Pircos vein system to define vein continuity at depth. On March 25, 2004, MDG withdrew from the depthproject and, since that time, we have operated the project with the primary objective of exploring precious metal veins of epithermal character. To date, we have located, mapped and sampled five principal veins, which have shown strong anomalous gold and silver values. The principal vein, continuity.the Diana vein, has a 380-meter long central section with average widths of 2.10 meters and grades of 8 grams per ton of gold and 300 grams per ton of silver. First pass drilling with a total 3,566 meters in 2002 over the Diana vein system showed mineralization of 203,680 metric tons at 18.3 grams per ton of gold and 17.4 ounces per ton of silver in veins with an average thickness of two meters. During 2004, the Companywe focused on renewing itsour surface rights permits and negotiated a three-year agreement with the Santa Rosa de Sexi and Corral Viejo neighborhoods, which were securedwas signed in MarchApril 2005, to ensure the continuation of itsour exploration activities at the Diana and Maribel veins. We are currently driving two crosscuts into the Diana vein system at levels of 2,000 meters and 2,050 meters. In 2006 and 2007, we intend to generate high-grade gold and silver ore reserves.

Minasnioc. The Minasnioc project wasis a joint venturemining exploration project with ABXBarrick and Compañía Minera Ares S.A.C., a company owned by the Hochschild Group, ("MHC").or MHC. In August 2004, ABXBarrick withdrew as operator of the Minasnioc project and since that date, the Company's haswe have been the operator of the project. The CompanyIn addition, MHC withdrew from the project in 2004. We currently hashave a 60 percent interest and isare in the process of acquiring additional interests in the project thereby diluting ABX's interest. Theto dilute Barrick's interest.The Minasnioc project is aencompasses 23,600 hectares of high sulfidation epithermal prospectterrain located in southern Peru, in the Huancavelica region, 310 kilometers southeast of Lima. The first-pass 2003 drilling campaign by ABXBarrick confirmed the presence of low-grade uneconomic gold mineralization hosted in volcanic rocks, mainly following a stratabound pattern. In the last quarter of 2004, the Companywe invested US$205,555 in exploration and the construction of new camp facilities. The CompanydetectedIn 2005, we invested US$861,768 in 1,802 meters of diamond drilling and additional studies to confirm the presence of gold enriched veinsveins. The results of the 2005 campaign indicated poor evidence of gold mineralization at depth. In 2006, our exploration efforts will focus on exploring additional areas not previously explored in detail by Barrick and plans to conduct additi onal drilling and underground activity as well as increase itsdefine our interest in the Minasnioc Project in 2005.Project.

Patagonia.The Patagonia project was a joint venturemining exploration project between the Company,us, Yamana Resources Inc., Yamana Resources Ltd., Recursos Yamana Ltd., Recursos Yamana S.A. (the owner of the mining concessions) and Lorenzon Ltd. (a company owned by the Hochschild Group, ("MHC"))or MHC). The project consisted of 127,927 hectares and was located in southern Argentina, 60 kilometers northeast from the Anglo Gold Cerro Vanguardia gold mine in the Santa Cruz province. To date, the Patagonia project had two main prospective areas identified; namely Martinetas and La Paloma. During 2003, the Company and MHC invested US$1.4 million in a 2,020 meter diamond drilling campaign over two sets of gold bearing veins in the Martinetas prospect, which indicated resources of 141,300 metric tons at 15.6 grams per ton of gold with an average thickness of 1.1 meters, and a 2,172 meter diamond drilling campaign in the La Paloma prospect, which indicated resources of 206,250 metric tons at 9.8 grams per ton of gold with an average thickness of 1.8 meters. In 2004 the Company conducted an intensive survey to discover new prospective areas in the regions outside the Martinetas and La Paloma prospects, which had negative results. In August 2004, the Companywe decided to discontinue itsour investment in the Patagonia project and withdrew from this project due to insufficient grade and tonnage generated by trenching and drilling the joint venture.Martinetas and La Paloma prospects. We are currently pursuing new opportunities for exploration in this region.

Poracota.The Poracota joint mining exploration project is currently operated by the Company pursuant to an agreement with Minas Poracota, S.A. ("Minas Poracota"). Minas, in which we have a 75 percent interest, and Teck Cominco owns the remaining 25 percent interest. The Poracota is a joint venture between Southwestern Resources Corp. ("SWG") and TCL. The project encompasses 6,674 hectares owned by Minas Poracota S.A. (a former subsidiary of Minera del Suroeste S.A.C.) and is located 20 kilometers west of the Orcopampa mine in southern Peru, owned by Minas Poracota S.A. (a subsidiary of Minera del Suroeste S.A.C.). The Company hasPeru. On December 31, 2005, we exercised an option to acquirepurchase a 50 percent interestparticipation in Minas Poracota S.A. withfrom SWG for a US$4.6 million payment to SWG. The Company haspayment. We also agreed to invest and invested US$0.4, US$1.0 and US$1.6 million in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, to exercise a second option for an additional 25 percent interest from TCL. Thereafter, the Company may exercise an option to acquire a 50 percent interest of Minas Poracota S.A. The Company holds claims for 16,300 hectares in the Soras region, located between the Poracota project and the Orcopampa mine.Teck Cominco. The epithermal high sulfidation system comprises two main areas: Huamanihuayta and Perseverancia. In 2003, the Companywe invested US$1.5 million in the Poracota project, which included an 87.2 kilometer87.2-kilometer magnetic survey and a 7,314 meter7,314-meter diamond drilling campaign. DuringDurin g 2003 and 2004, the drilling campaign in the Huamanihuayta area indicated resources of 1,750,000 metric tons at 11 grams per ton of goldconfirmed two sub-horizontal structures, Manto Dorado and Manto Aguila, with an average thickness of 5 to 6 meters in two sub-horizontal veins, Manto Dorado and Manto Aguila.each. The Manto Dorado veinstructure included resourcesNRM of 693,785 metric tons at 10.6 grams per ton of gold with an average thickness of 6.0 meters and the Manto Aguila veinstructure included resources of 801,687 metric tons at 10.0 grams per ton of gold with an average thickness of 5.2 meters. In 2004, the Companywe invested US$2.45 million in 967 meters of underground workings and a 5,250 meter5,250-meter diamond drilling campaign. In addition, the Companywe invested US$2.95 million for the construction of a 30.5 kilometer30.5-kilometer gravel road to connect the Poracota project to the Orcopampa mine. In 2005, the Compan y plans to advance itswe advanced our exploration efforts with 1,6001,688 meters of underground workings conduct 5,300and 6,369 meters of diamond drilling and conductconducted metallurgical and pilot tests. We are currently preparing two scoping studies based on an updated ore reserve calculation.

Puquio. The Puquio generative project iswas a joint venturemining exploration project with Gold Fields that encompassesoriginally encompassed 18,073 hectares of hydrothermally altered and mineralized volcanic terrain in the Ayacucho region, 500 kilometers southeast of Lima. The project iswas operated by Gold Fields, which hashad a 60 percent effective participation. In 2003, US$370,000 was invested to review selected anomalies detected by rock-geochemistry and satellite imagery. In 2004, Gold Fields invested US$430,000 in the Incapacha prospect to conduct 2,500 meters of diamond drilling, 3,000 meters of reverse circulation drilling and an electromagnetic survey, which had negative results. In addition, Gold Fields also invested US$162,000 to evaluate the Titanca, Tampa Tampa, Condoray and Ñayca prospects in 2004. The Incapacha property was explored with 2,492 meters of drilling with disappointing results. In 2005, we and Gold Fields plans to conductinvested US$688,667 in 2,500 meters of a diamond drilling campaign at the Ñayca prospect.prospect and thereafter decided to abandon the project due to poor geochemical results. The joint exploration agreement was terminated in February 2006.

Salpo.Grupo Wiese owns mining concessions that encompass 6,271 hectares in northern Peru, 70 kilometers east from Trujillo, through Minera Salpo S.A. The Company hadWe negotiated an option to acquire a 51 percent interest of Minera Salpo S.A. if it investswe were to invest US$2.0 million in exploration. Salpo is a historical mining district characterized by epithermal veins rich in gold and silver. In 2002, the Company reopened mines along the Salpo and Milluachaqui veins to conduct mapping and sampling, that have demonstrated 4 to 6 grams of gold per ton and 15 to 20 ounces of silver per ton in a thickness of 0.6 to 1.0 meters. During 2003, the Company invested US$1.7 million in drilling and exploration activities, including 3,424 meters of diamond drilling and drifting of 731 meters, which indicated resources of 20,000 metric tons at 6.4 grams per told of gold and 3.2 ounces per ton of silver with an average width of 1.0 meters. After a total investment of US$2.1 million the Companyin diamond drilling and underground workings, we decided not to exercise i tsour option to acquire an additional 51 percent interest in Minera Salpo S.A. due to the disappointing results of exploration effortsresults and, on October 31, 2003, we withdrew from the joint venture. The Company hasthis project. We have performed environmental remediation efforts prior to returning the consolidated mining properties to Minera Salpo S.A. in September 2004.

Samana. The Samana project which iswas operated by the Company,us from 2001 to 2003 and is a carve-out of the former Ayacucho joint venture with Newmont Peru. The CompanyWe and Newmont Peru executed the carve-out agreement on December 6, 2000, providing for the eventual dilution of Newmont Peru's interest in the project. Following the Company'sour investment of US$884,000, Newmont Peru will decide whether to maintain its diluted participation in the project or repurchase its participation interest in the project.therein. Consisting of 7,300 hectares, the project is located in the high plateaus of Ayacucho, 35 kilometers northwest of Puquio. During the period from 1996 to 1999, Newmont Peru performed geological mapping, rock-chip sampling, trenching and 1,200 meters of diamond drilling. The existence of a low-grade, superficial, disseminated gold and silver oxide deposit was tested and eventually disregarded. Thereafter, the Company undertook the evaluation of smaller but higher-grade mineralized breccias. The 2001-2002 e xploration campaign focused on accessing 200 meters of the Osiris breccia by tunneling to conduct detailed evaluation of grade, thickness and continuity of this tabular structure. In addition, the Company performed three short diamond drill holes which proved the persistence of this potential ore shoot 50 to 100 meters below surface, with a thickness ranging between 2 and 20 meters and grades fluctuating between 5 and 6 grams of gold per ton in oxides. During 2003, the Companywe invested US$0.2 million in 1,190 meters of diamond drilling over the east side of the Osiris breccia. This drilling campaign indicated the presence of limited resources and after having invested, in the aggregate, US$922,274 the Company hasfor our exploration campaign, in 2004 we decided to discontinue itsour investment in the Samana project. Mining claims relating to this project will lapse in June 2006.

Aguas Verdes. The Aguas Verdes project, operated by Peñoles, consists of 3,800 hectares in the Ayacucho region. The Company hasWe have a 20 percent interest and Peñoles has the remaining 80 percent interest in the project. During 2004, Peñoles decided not to conduct additional exploration in 2005 after having invested US$560,000 for an aggregate of US$710,000 in 3,267 meters of diamond drilling and 12,500 meters of geophysical lines over the Aguas Verdes and Molino copper and gold enrichedgold-enriched skarn bodies with high grades but disappointing tonnage results. Peñoles has decided not conduct additional exploration in 2005. The Company doesWe do not intend to conduct an exploration program in the Aguas Verdes project in 2005.2006.

Tantahuatay. The Tantahuatay project, a gold copper project, is wholly owned by Compañía Minera Coimolache S.A. ("Coimolache"), or Coimolache, an entity which is 40.1 percent owned by the Company,us, 44.2 percent owned by SPCC, and 15.7 percent owned by ESPRO S.A.C., a Peruvian-based holding company. Since January 2003, the project has been managed and operated by an independent mining engineer, Ing. Amado Yataco, appointed by the Company.us. The area of the project consists of over 17,722 hectares of potentially mineralized ground. The Tantahuatay project is located 30 kilometers northwest of Yanacocha in the Hualgayoc district, 950 kilometers north of the city of Lima. Two of the five outcropping gold anomalies have drill-indicated geological resources of 600,000 ounces of gold and 7 million ounces of silver.NRM. Tantahuatay 2 was infill-drilled during 2002 and hosts a measured and drill-indicated mineral resourceNRM of 274,000 ounces of gold. The studies have been focused in the oxide zone onl y.only. Cyanidation column tests have been realizedcompleted with encouraging results, which indicate rapid extractions in the order of 80 to 90 percent, by low-concentration cyanide leaching. The Tantahuatay 2 prospect is being evaluated for Feasibility and Environmental Impact Studies during 2006. After infill-drilling is finished in the Ciénaga deposit, a feasibility study will be finalized to address viability of a 15,000 tons15,000-ton per day open-pit/heap leach operation. The Company isWe are focusing itsour efforts on resolving community issues and obtaining permits and licenses to continue itsour explorationandenhance support of itsour infill drilling and feasibility studies for both oxides and sulfides targets.

Company Exploration Projects

Ccarhuarazo. The Ccarhuarazo project, located 40 kilometers north of Puquio, During 2005, Coimolache invested US$1.55 million in the department of Ayacucho in south-central Peru,Tantahuatay project.

El Faique Project.The El Faique project, previously known as El Papayo, is wholly-owned and consisting of 15,187 hectares was operated by us. The project encompasses 87,574 hectares and is located in the Company until December 2002. Inversiones Minera La Familia ownsSechura desert of northern Peru in the southern 3,201Piura region. This project includes 3,200 hectares ofsold to us by Cedimin on April 4, 2006. During 2005, we invested US$1.6 million to acquire the project.property from Manhattan Minerals and other third parties and to claim new areas. The Company had an agreement with La Familia to jointly develop the area, whichEl Faique project consists of a volcanic centerdeep massive sulfide deposit evidenced by diamond drilling 400 to 700 meters below the surface in the B5gravimetric anomaly. This deposit contains a higher-grade mineralization of 7.91 million tons with epithermal veins2.3 percent copper and breccias with copper-silver-gold mineralization. During 2002, 1,188 meterstraces of zinc and gold. In 2006, we intend to address social issues that may arise and invest in gravimetric reinterpretation and hydrogeologic studies to determine ground water resources.

Oyotun. The Oyotun project is wholly-owned and was operatedby us until 2005. Consisting of 11,400 hectares, the project is located on a prospective area of massive sulfide deposits in northern Peru in the coastal zone of Piura and the Lambayeque and La Libertad regions. In 2005, we invested US$236,237 in regional surveys at the Sican prospect, where we conducted a drilling campaign of 270 meters. Due to the lack of mineralization at this prospect, we do not intend to conduct additional field work in 2006.

Cordillera Oriental. The Cordillera Oriental project is wholly-owned and operatedby us. Consisting of 4,900 hectares, the project is located on three prospective areas in the eastern cordillera of Central Peru in the Pasco and Junin regions. These areas were drilledidentified after a regional stream sediment campaign was conducted by INGEMMET in 10 holesearly 2004. In 2005, we invested US$121,555 in the Cordillera Oriental project and identified and claimed mining properties over three mineralized areas. In 2006, we intend to continue field work over the veins systems. Dueclaimed prospects to disappointing results, the Company transferred its propertiesdefine mineralization and information in the Ccarhuarazo project to Minera Argento S.A.C. in 2003.The Company performed environmental remediation efforts prior to delivering the property to Minera Argento S.A.C.The agreement with Inversiones Mineras La Familia S.A.C. was terminated on January 10, 2003.consolidate our position.

Huancavelica Project.The Huancavelica project is wholly owned and operated by the Company.us. Consisting of 47,06848,915 hectares, the project is located incovers several prospects of the Huancavelica region. The CompanyWe initiated exploration efforts in 1994 with the purpose of identifying base-metal skarns and/or disseminated precious metal deposits along the Cenozoic volcanic belt.belt and underlying Mesozoic basement. During 2003, the Pampa Andino prospect was separated from the Huancavelica project. In 2004, the Companywe invested US$473,000 to evaluate several prospective areas, including the Cofradía, Yuracjasa, Dorita Sur and Llipina prospects. At the end of 2004, the Cofradía prospect was separated from the Huacavelica project, and at the end of 2005 and the beginning of 2006, the El Milagro and Tinyaclla prospects were separated from the Huancavelica project. The Company plansWe plan to continue to evaluate several prospective areas in 2005.2006 to identify potentially economic mineralization.

Cofradia Project.The Cofradia project is wholly-owned and operated by us. At the end of 2004, we agreed with Barrick to consolidate all mining rights at the Cofradia project to conduct a comprehensive reassessment of its precious metal potential. The Cofradia project encompasses 20,200 hectares and is located in the Huancavelica region, next to the Minasnioc project. It consists of epithermal high sulfidation structures in volcanic terrain of the Caudalosa Formation. During 2005, we invested US$517,603 in 1,587 meters of diamond drilling in eight holes, which depicted that the gold content at greater depths does not reflect values identified at the surface. We do not plan to conduct further exploration in this project in 2006.

Pampa Andino. ThePrior to 2005, the Pampa Andino project iswas owned by Minera Totoral S.A, ("Totoral"). Consistingor Totoral. In May 2005, we acquired mining rights from Totoral for US$1.9 million. The Pampa Andino project consists of 18,900 hectares and located 175 kilometers south eastsoutheast of Lima, on the border between the Ica and Huancavelica regions, the project is operated by the Company. The Company owns 16,000 hectares of the Pampa Andino project and Totoral owns the remaining 2,900 hectares, which the Company is in the process of acquiring.regions. The Pampa Andino project is a low sulfidation epithermal vein system and is the outcome of a regional exploration program designed to focus on goldexplorationin Huancavelica. In 2003, the Companywe invested US$0.3 million in 2,726 meters of diamond drilling over the Rosita and Claudia veins. In 2004, the Companywe invested US$1.1 million in 300 meters of diamond drilling and 1,563 meters of underground workings, initially identifying NRM of 15,700 metric tons at 15.0 grams per ton of gold and 21 ounces per ton of silver at the Rosita vein. DuringIn 2005, we invested US$1.3 million in 3,036 meters of diamond drilling and 1,458 meters of underground workings at the Company plans t oRosita vein. Du ring 2006, we plan to continue diamond drilling and extendingto extend underground workings.workings at least another 500 meters.

JatunHatun Orcco. The JatunPrior to 2005, the Hatun Orcco project iswas wholly owned and operated by the Company.us. Consisting of 20,700 hectares of mining properties, the project is located 20 kilometers north of the Antapite mine in the headwaters of the Ica valley. The JatunHatun Orcco project is the outcome of a regional exploration program designed to focus on goldexplorationin Huancavelica. Epithermal veins, located in the JatunHatun Orcco Norte, JatunHatun Orcco Sur and Karla prospects, have sporadic high-grade gold and silver leakagegeochemical anomalies. During 2003, the Company'sour exploration efforts included a US$1.1 million investment in an advancedunderground exploration program of 1,276 meters to test for grade continuity along the Mercedes and Capicúa veins in the JatunHatun Orcco Sur prospect. The results indicated resourcesconfirmed NRM of 16,330 metric tons at 16.9 grams per ton of gold and 6.6 ounces per ton of silver with an average width of 1.1 meters. In 2004, the Companywe continued itsour exploration efforts, investing US$1.2 mil lionmillion in 1,7031,7 03 meters of tunneling and 1,710 meters of diamond drilling in the JatunHatun Orco Sur prospect. In March 2005, we decided to lease the Company transferred its miningland and mineral rights of the Hatun Orcco project to Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A. ("Inminsur"), or Inminsur, who will operate the project going forward.forward due to the proximity to the Antapite mine and mill area. We do not intend to continue any work on this project.

Altiplano Peru. The Franja Sur project, renamed the Altiplano Peru project in 2004, is wholly owned and operated by the Company.us. Consisting of 36,5877,200 hectares, the project is located in the Apurimac, Arequipa, Cusco and Puno regions of volcanic rocks and carbonate terrains of south-eastern Peru. After regional reconnaissance and a selection of mineralized areas, the Companywe conducted initial mapping, sampling and drilling at several project sites, including the Pichacani prospect, which has demonstrated a strong mercury and tellurium anomaly in a high sulfidation epithermal system. During 2003, the Companywe invested US$0.6 million to explore the Pichacani prospect, which had disappointing results. In 2004, the Companywe conducted first pass drilling with a total of 591 meters drilled in the Chilacocha epithermal prospect located in the Apurimac region.region, investing US$0.4 million. Due to disappointing results, the Company haswe have decided to cease activity in the Chilacocha prospect after engaging in environmental remedia tionremediation efforts. In 2005,200 5, we invested US$0.2 million in a regional exploration program on gold stream sediment anomalies previously detected in the Company plansPuno region in the Armapampa prospect with disappointing results. In 2006, we plan to continue itsour exploration activities in the Apurimac, Cusco and Puno regions and Ayacucho region.in new areas, with a renewed effort to evaluate third-party properties.

Soras. The Soras project is wholly-owned by the Companyus and located adjacent, to the east, of the Poracota project. The Soras project encompasses 23,16722,323 hectares of hydrothermally altered and mineralized volcanic terrain in the Arequipa region. In 2004 the Companyand 2005, we identified two main mineralized structures, the Soraya and Soraya 1 veins, with surface ore grades of up to 26 grams per ton of gold. First passFirst-pass drilling at 347.5 meters identified two narrow gold interceptsveins with grades of 16 and 36 grams per ton of gold with highan average of 5.9 ounces of silver and copper grades.3.8 percent copper. In 2006, we plan to conduct underground workings and additional drilling to contour mineralization and generate new ore reserves.

Trapiche. The Trapiche project is wholly-owned by us and encompasses 5,600 hectares of porphyry and skarn style mineralization in the Apurimac region. The Apurimac region is part of a mineralized area known as Andahuaylas-Yauri batholith, where several deposits have been identified. In 2005, we conducted a magnetic geophysical reinterpretation, metallurgical tests and a diamond drilling campaign on the Company planstwo main prospects, Millucucho and Cerro Trapiche. In 2006, we plan to conduct additional8,500 meters of drilling in both Millucucho and underground workingsCerro Trapiche porphyry to contouredcontour and expand disseminated copper and molybdenum mineralization.

Arenizo. The Arenizo project is owned by Inminsur, which is 78.04 percent owned by the Companyus and 21.96 percent owned by Brandon Properties Inc., a Panamanian corporation. The Arenizo project encompasses 3,1502,916 hectares of hydrothermally altered and mineralized volcanic terrain in the Arequipa region. In 2003, the Companywe invested US$60,000 in superficial exploration efforts with systematic trenches, which identified the Anita, María and Nelly quartz veins. In 2004, the Companywe invested US$1.3 million, in exploration efforts, focusing on 886.7 meters of underground workings and 3,544 meters of diamond drilling in the Anita, María and Nellythese veins, which have indicated a resourceconfirmed NRM of 7,305 metric tons at 9.54 grams per ton of gold with an average thickness of 1.201.2 meters. In 2005, the Company plans206, we do not plan to conduct additional underground workings and geological mapping of Maria and Nelly veins.exporation in Arenizo.

Cedimin. Cedimin S.A.C. is wholly owned by the Companyus and controls 55,18651,649 hectares of owned and leased mining concessions. During 2002, Cedimin invested US$2.5 million in exploration.concessions, including the Crucero project and others. As of January 2, 2003, Minera Shila S.A.C. merged with and into Cedimin and is no longer a separate legal entity. As a result of this merger, mining activities at Cediminincreased significantly compared to its exploration activities. In addition, on October 22, 2004, Cedimin acquired a 100 percent equity interest in Inversiones Mineras Aureas S.A.C. (", or Mineras Aureas"),Aureas, which had a 49 percent interest in Minera Paula 49 S.A.C. (", or Minera Paula").Paula. As a result of this acquisition, Minera Paula became wholly owned by the Company.us. As of December 31, 2004, Mineras Aureas and Minera Paula merged with and into Cedimin and are no longer separate legal entities.

Brownfield Exploration Projects

Uchucchacua. The Uchucchacua brownfield exploration project is located in 12,527 hectares of our mining and exploration properties and was established in late 2004 and began operations in 2005. We have currently focused our exploration on three prospects, Pozo Rico, Anamaray and Mallay. The Pozo Rico prospect is a silver-rich breccia pipe deposit with manganese, lead and zinc skarn. Ore reserves as of December 31, 2005 are 265,855 dry short tons, or DST, with an average grade of 16.6 ounces per ton of silver, 0.5 percent lead and 0.9 percent zinc. In 2005, we invested US$2,481,310 in 2,960 meters of underground exploration workings and 6,980 meters of diamond drilling. In 2006, we expect to invest US$2.7 million in the Pozo Rico prospect. The Anamaray prospect is another silver, lead and zinc-bearing set of breccias and veins in limestone. During late 2005 we invested US$625,090 in 3,029 meters of diamond drilling and intercepted several ore-grade structures. In 2006, we intend to continue underground workings and to invest US$0.6 million in the Anamaray prospect. The Mallay prospect consists of 6,952 hectares leased for 20 years and optioned for four years, which will expire in Feburary 2008, from Minera Los Rios S.R.L. Exploration activities during 2005 included 36,000 meters of geophysical surveys, 460 meters of diamond drilling and 20 meters of underground workings for an aggregate investment of US$625,090. Mineralization out of reserves is estimated at 475,760 DST at an average grade of 9.8 percent zinc, 4.8 percent lead and 6.3 ounces per ton silver in massive sulfide and skarn deposits. In 2006, we expect to invest US$1.1 million in advancing the Mallay prospect with underground tunneling and diamond drilling.

Orcopampa.Brownfield exploration at the Layo deposit was encouraging during 2005. Diamond drill tests carried out in the northern sector intercepted three mineralized structures: the first with a 0.8 meter thickness and 12.5 ounces per DST of gold, 0.7 ounces per DST of silver and traces of copper; the second with a 0.5 meter thickness with 0.03 ounces per DST of gold, 18.3 ounces per DST of silver and 4.5 percent copper; and the third with a 0.8 meter thickness with 0.6 ounces per DST of gold, 21.7 ounces per DST of silver and 3.4 percent copper. New reserves found during initial workings in 2005 were 20,875 DST with 0.3 ounces per DST of gold, 2.5 ounces per DST of silver and 0.3 percent copper. Metallurgical tests of diamond drill cores suggest that the Layo mineralization is apt for gravity and flotation treatment. Bulk samples were sent for metallurgical assaying obtaining concentrates with a high grade of silver, gold and copper with recoveries ranging between 80 percent and 90 percent. Metallurgical research will continue to establish optimum operational parameters for the flotation circuit at Orcopampa's concentration plant which is currently available for use and rated to treat up to 1,200 DST per day, although the crushing and the milling processes require adaptation. In 2005, we invested US$2.2 million in the Layo prospect. In 2006 we plan to invest an additional US$5.8 million to continue underground exploration workings and diamond drilling.

Julcani-Recuperada.In view of the encouraging results obtained at Julcani from the exploration work conducted on the Acchilla dome veins, we have begun to explore other structures in the Condoray and Taype domes, as well as in the area between these two domes and Acchilla. Exploration activities in the Recuperada region focused on the Esperanza area to search for new reserves to justify resuming mining operations. As of December 31, 2005, we calculated 143,190 DST of mineral out of reserves with 10.4 ounces per DST of silver, 2.8 percent lead and 5.0 percent zinc. Additionally, we estimated 94,905 DST with 6.2 ounces per DST of silver, 6.8 percent lead and 4.9 percent zinc in other areas, totaling 238,095 DST with 8.7 ounces per DST silver, 4.4 percent lead and 4.9 percent zinc. Mineralization located in areas currently inaccessible in the lower sections of the Teresita mine was estimated in the order of 605,185 DST, with 2.8 ounces per DST of silver, 5.9 percent lead and 8.2 perce nt zinc. From these, 190,835 DST is proven-probable ore reserves and 414,350 DST is NRM indicated by drill holes. In the Hallazgo area, we are exploring a group of veins with silver, lead and zinc mineralization. We intend to focus our exploration efforts in 2006 to locate new reserves. Remnants of old mine workings in the areas of Carhuancho, together with information on the mining activity of this particular area in colonial times, appear to make Recuperada's brownfield exploration a target worth studying and exploring.

Shila-Paula.The Shila-Paula brownfield exploration is focused on several areas surrounding actual operating units such as Ampato, Paula Brownfield, Puncuhuayco-Ticlla, Tocracancha and other prospects. In 2005, we invested US$0.77 million to conduct trenching and diamond drilling in the Ampato and Tocracancha prospects. The Ampato prospect is located northwest of the Shila-Paula mine. The Angela vein in the Ampato prospect shows gold and silver values up to 130 grams per ton and 128 grams per ton respectively. In the Ticlla prospect, the Teresa vein shows gold and silver values up to 18.8 grams per ton and 706 grams per ton, respectively, as well as base metal content. In Paula Brownfield, we are conducting a 1,050 meter diamond drilling campaign. In Tocracancha, we conducted 1,607 meters of diamond drilling with poor results, and accordingly, this prospect was discarded because of irregular continuity of metal content in the veins. In 2006, we plan to conduct complementary undergro und workings in the Ampato prospect and diamond drilling in the Ticlla prospect. We estimate that we will invest US$0.91 million to be invested, focusing on the Ampato, Ticlla and Paula Brownfield prospects.

Competition

The Company believesWe believe that competition in the metals market is based primarily upon cost. The Company competesWe compete with other mining companies and private individuals for the acquisition of mining concessions and leases in Peru and for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.

Sales of Metal Concentrates

All of the Company'sour metal production is sold to smelters, traders and banks, either in concentrate or metal form, such as gold-silver concentrate, silver-lead concentrate, zinc concentrate, lead-gold-copper concentrate and gold bullion. The Company'sOur concentrates sales are made under one to three-year, U.S. Dollar-denominated contracts, pursuant to which the selling price is based on world metal prices as follows: generally, in the case of gold and silver-based concentrates, the London Spot settlement prices for gold, less certain allowances, and the London Spot or the United States Commodities Exchange settlement price for silver, less certain allowances; and, in the case of base-metal concentrates, such as zinc, lead and copper, the London Metals Exchange settlement prices for the specific metal, less certain allowances. Sales prices vary according to formulas that take into account agreed contactualcontractual average prices for a quotational period, generally being the month of, the mont hmonth prior to, or the month following the scheduled month of shipment or delivery according to the terms of the contracts.

The historical average annual prices for gold and silver per ounce and the Company'sour average annual gold and silver prices per ounce for each of the last five years are set forth below:

Gold

Silver

Gold

Silver

Average Annual

Market Price

Average Annual

Company Price(1)

Average Annual

Market Price

Average Annual

Company Price(1)

Average Annual

Market Price

Our Average

Annual Price(1)

Average Annual

Market Price

Our Average

Annual Price(1)

US$/oz.(2)

US$/oz.

US$/oz.(3)

US$/oz.

US$/oz.(2)

US$/oz.

US$/oz.(3)

US$/oz.

2000

279.03

275.39

4.95

4.95

2001

270.99

270.80

4.37

4.36

270.99

270.80

4.37

4.36

2002

309.97

309.39

4.60

4.65

309.97

309.39

4.60

4.65

2003

363.51

364.88

4.88

4.91

363.51

364.88

4.88

4.91

2004

409.21

373.78

6.65

6.51

409.21

373.78

6.65

6.51

2005 (through April 30, 2005)

427.83

376.68

7.01

7.02

2005

444.88

359.75

7.31

7.38

2006 (through April 28, 2006)

566.49

346.66

10.35

10.43

____________

(1) TheOur average annual Company price includes only the consolidated average annual price from the Julcani, Uchucchacua, Orcopampa, Recuperada, Colquijirca, Ishihuinca and Shila mines.

(2) Average annual gold prices are based on the London PM fix as provided by Metals Week.

(3) Average annual silver prices are based on London Spot prices.

Most of the sales contracts the Company enterswe enter into with itsour customers state a specific amount of metal or concentrate the customer will purchase. The Company hasWe have sales commitments from various parties for virtually all of itsour estimated 20052006 production; however, concentrates not sold under any of the Company'sour contracts may be sold on a spot sale basis to merchants and consumers.

Sales and Markets

The following table sets forth the Company'sour total revenues from the sale of gold, silver, lead, zinc and copper in the past three fiscal years:

As of and for the year ended December 31(1)

As of and for the year ended December 31(1)

Product

2002

2003

2004

2002

2003

2004

2003

2004

2005

2003

2004

2005

(In thousands of constant S/. as of December 31, 2004)

(In thousands of US$)

(In thousands of constant S/. as of December 31, 2005)

(In thousands of US$)

Gold

286,777

436,541

455,506

76,422

118,149

132,064

436,541

455,506

414,269

118,149

132,064

125,422

Silver

192,441

201,301

319,791

54,718

54,482

92,716

201,301

319,791

353,870

54,482

92,716

107,136

Lead

35,724

47,255

97,582

10,290

12,789

28,292

47,255

97,582

97,465

12,789

28,292

29,508

Zinc

143,735

153,275

187,563

40,869

41,483

54,379

153,275

187,563

223,537

41,483

54,379

67,677

Copper

1,777

1,586

1,193

505

429

346

1,586

1,193

1,741

429

346

527

________________

(1) Does not include refinery charges and penalties incurred in 2005, 2004 and 2003 and 2002 of S/.176,288 (US$53,372) , S/.164,447 (US$47,678) ,and S/.145,985 (US$39,511) and S/.145,043 (US$41,241), respectively.

The CompanyWe sold itsour concentrates to 1516 customers in 2004.2005. Approximately 4548 percent, 4854 percent and 54 percent of the Company'sour concentrate sales in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively, were sold outside Peru. Set forth below is a table that shows the percentage of sales of concentrate from the Company'sour mines, and of sales of gold bullion that were sold to the Company'sour various customers from 20022003 to 2004.2005.

Percentage of Concentrates and Gold Bullion Sales

Percentage of Concentrates and Gold Bullion Sales

 

2002

2003

2004

 

2003

2004

2005

Export Sales:

 

 

 

 

Umicore

 

-

1.24

1.64

S.A. Sogem N.V.

 

1.05

0.36

---

Johnson Matthey

 

31.27

36.38

44.74

Trafigura

 

0.67

-

1.64

Hochschild

 

1.39

1.86

0.54

Glencore

 

4.72

3.36

1.72

Metaleurop

 

1.57

-

---

Noranda

 

2.55

2.67

0.88

 

2.67

0.88

-

Pechiney

 

1.27

2.13

1.77

 

2.13

1.77

-

Hochschild

 

1.86

0.54

0.50

Sogem

 

0.36

-

Johnson Matthey

 

36.38

44.74

7.91

Glencore

 

3.36

1.72

6.55

Trafigura

 

-

1.64

-

Marc Rich

0.59

0.45

0.42

 

0.45

0.42

1.39

Umicore

 

1.24

1.64

1.83

Transamine

 

-

1.02

-

1.02

1.30

J.P. Morgan

 

-

7.46

Standard Bank

Standard Bank

 

-

9.11

Macquarie

 

-

8.40

Mitsui

 

-

9.51

Total Export Sales

Total Export Sales

45.08

48.45

54.37

 

48.45

54.37

53.96

Domestic Sales:

 

 

 

 

Doe Run

 

10.05

14.75

17.82

Cormin

 

34.16

32.52

11.81

 

32.52

11.81

14.74

Doe Run

 

11.75

10.05

14.75

BHL

 

3.56

2.81

9.69

 

2.81

9.69

7.68

Cajamarquilla

 

2.04

1.69

2.19

Cajamarquilla

 

1.69

2.19

2.60

Procesadora Sudamericana

 

0.42

0.61

0.74

 

0.61

0.74

0.83

Ayssa

 

2.99

3.87

6.45

 

3.87

6.45

2.37

Total Domestic Sales

Total Domestic Sales

54.92

51.55

45.63

 

51.55

45.63

46.04

Total Sales

 

100

 

100

Under the terms of the Doe Run S.R.L. (", or Doe Run")Run, sales contract dated February 3, 2005, the Company is2, 2006, we are required to supply Doe Run with approximately 1,9002,400 wet metric tons, ("WMTs")or WMTs per year of Julcani's silver-lead concentrates in 2005.2006 and 2007. The price of the concentrates supplied under the contract is based on specified market prices minus deductions.

Under the terms of the ConsorcioConsarao Minero S.A. ("Cormin") sales contract dated January 28, 2005, the Company is required to supply Cormin with approximately 7,000 WMTs of Uchucchacua silver-lead concentrates from January 2005 to December 2005. The price of the concentrate supplied under the contract is based on specified market quotations minus deductions.

Under the terms of the, or Cormin, sales contract dated January 13, 2005, the Company iswe are required to supply Cormin with approximately 3,000 WMTs in 2004, 6,000 to 9,000 WMTs in 2005 and 7,000 to 10,000 WMTs in 2006 of Uchucchacua zinc concentrates from December 2004 to December 2006. The price of the concentrate supplied under the contract is based on specified market quotations minus deductions.

Under the terms of the BHL Perú S.A.C. ("BHL"), or BHL, sales contract,contracts dated March 30, 2004, the Company isJanuary 19, 2006 and April 20, 2006, we are required to supply BHL with approximately 5,00013,500 WMTs per year of Uchucchacua silver-lead concentrates in 2004 and 2005.2006. The price of the concentrate supplied under the contract is based on specified market quotations minus deductions.

Under the terms of the BHL sales contract dated March 30, 2004, the Company isJanuary 18, 2006, we are required to supply BHL with approximately 5,0003,000 WMTs in 2004 and 8,000 WMTs in 20052006 of Uchucchacua's zinc concentrates. The price of the concentrates supplied under the contract is based on specified market quotations minus deductions.

Under the terms of the Doe Run sales contract dated February 14, 2004, the Company is2, 2006, we are required to supply Doe Run with a minimum ofapproximately 15,000 WMTs per yearin 2006 and 18,000 WMTs in 2007 of Uchucchacua silver-lead concentrates to be delivered during 2004 and 2005.concentrates. The price of the concentrate supplied under the contract is based on specified market quotations minus deductions.

Under the terms of the AYS S.A. ("Ayssa")BHL sales contract dated February 14, 2004, the Company isApril 20, 2006, we are required to supply AyssaBHL with approximately 5,0005,700 WMTs in 2004of Recuperada silver-lead concentrates and 8,000 WMTs in 2005 of Uchucchacua'sRecuperada zinc concentrates.concentrates from May 2006 until April 2007. The price of the concentrate supplied under the contract is based on specified market quotations minus deductions.

The CompanyWe also sellssell refined gold, which is derived from itsour operations at Orcopampa, ShilaShila-Paula, Antapite and Ishihuinca and processed at its industrial plants at Orcopampa and at a local smelter in Lima, to one customer, Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company, ("or Johnson Matthey"),Matthey, which further refines the gold. Under the terms of the Johnson Matthey sales contract, the Company supplieswe supply Johnson Matthey, at Johnson Matthey's option, with gold assaying in excess of 75 percent gold and approximately 20 percent silver, monthly from January 1, 20042006 to December 31, 2005.2006. The price of the gold supplied under the contract is determined based on, for the gold content, the quotation for gold at the London Gold Market PM fixing in U.S. Dollars, and for the silver content, the quotation for silver at the London Silver Market spot fixing in U.S. Dollars, minus, in each case, certain minimum charges, as well as charges for customs clearance and treatment of the gold (which varies depending on its gold and silver conte nt)content). The contract also provides that the Companywe may elect to have itsour material toll refined at Johnson Matthey's Royston U.K. works and returned to the Company'sour account for sale to third parties. Under the terms of the contract, the Company iswe are responsible for delivering the gold to Johnson Matthey's designated flight at the Lima airport.

On December 31, 2003, the Company replaced four derivative contracts with sales contracts requiring physical delivery of gold over future periods that do not extend beyond 2012. Under the terms of the contracts, the Company will realize capped prices ranging from US$332 to US$451 per ounce. These contracts are accounted as normal sales contracts. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk".

In addition, the Company sells zinc and lead derived from its operations at the Colquijirca mine through Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A. ("El Brocal"). The Company sells the zinc concentrates from the Colquijirca mine under the terms of the following contracts: (1) pursuant to a contract dated January 22, 2001, the Company is required to supply Glencore with approximately 27,500 WMTs per year in 2001 and 2002, and with approximately 20,000 to 30,000 WMTs per year in 2003 and 2004; (2) pursuant to a contract dated January 22, 2001 the Company is required to supply Cormin/Trafigura Beheer B.V. with approximately 35,000 WMTs per year in 2001 and 2002, with approximately 20,000 to 30,000 WMTs in 2003 and with 20,000 to 35,000 WMTs in 2004; and (3) pursuant to a contract dated December 10, 1997, the Company is required to supply Metaleurop Commercial S.A.S. with approximately 20,000 WMTs per year during 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004. The Company sells the lead concentrates from the Colquijirca min e under the terms of the following contracts: (1) pursuant to a contract dated January 22, 2001, the Company is required to supply Glencore with approximately 15,000 WMTs per year in 2001 and 2002, and with approximately 10,000 to 15,000 WMTs per year in 2003 and 2004; and (2) pursuant to a contract dated February 26, 2001, the Company is required to supply Cormin/Trafigura with approximately 10,000 WMTs per year in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.

Hedging/Normal Sales Contracts

Company enteredIn October 2004, our Board of Directors issued a mandate not to enter into transactions that closed out approximately two thirds of its outstanding derivative contractsnew hedging transactions. At December 31, 2005, we were engaged in December 2003. These contracts were replaced with a series of sales contracts requiring physical delivery of the same quantity of gold over future periods that do not extend beyond 2012. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk".

Hedging

The Company engages in gold, silver and zinc price hedging activities, such as forward sales and put/call options, from derivative contracts executed prior to minimize its exposure1999. Since 2003, we have been modifying the terms of certain derivative instruments in order to fluctuations in the pricesqualify them as normal sales contracts. In March 2006, we closed out all our outstanding gold derivative contracts as of such metals. Currently, the Company only hedges for risk management purposesDecember 31, 2005 and does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.replaced them with normal sales contracts. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" and Note 3534 to the Company Financial Statements.

Yanacocha has generally not engaged in, and is currently not engaged in, gold price hedging activities, such as forward sales or option contracts, to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in the price of gold.

Regulatory Framework

Mining and Processing Concessions

In Peru, as in many other countries, the government retains ownership of all subsurface land and mineral resources. The surface land, however, is owned by the individual landowners. The Company'sOur right to explore, develop, extract, process and/or produce silver, gold and other metals is granted by the Peruvian government in the form of mining and processing concessions. The rights and obligations of holders of mining concessions, provisional permits and processing concessions are currently set forth in the General Mining Law (Single Unified Text, 1992, Supreme Decree 014-92-EM), which is administered by the MEM.

InPrior to 1991, in order to obtain a mining concession, prior to 1991, a prospective claimant filed a mining claim with the MEM and obtained from it a provisional permit to explore and/or develop the area of the claim. Thereafter, the MEM would issue a technical and legal report on the claimed area and the mining concession would be granted. In 1991, however, a new system was established for granting new mining concessions, based onUniversal Transversal Mercator Coordinates (", or UTM Coordinates")Coordinates, to map the mining concessions and provisional permits on Peru's land area. Under the new system, no provisional permits are granted, and therefore filers of mining claims filed after 1991 must obtain a mining concession before they may explore and/or develop the areas claimed. A holder of a provisional permit, granted with respect to claims over an area claimed before 1991 who follows proper procedures to comply with the new 1991 system, however, is permitted to continue to explore and/or develop the area cla imed.claimed.

Following implementation of the new system in 1991, there was a period of transition during which pre-1991 provisional permits and mining concessions could be brought into compliance with the new grid coordinate system by following certain specified procedures. Some conflicts developed regarding recognizing new mining concessions, identifying the exact location of old mining claims and placing old mining claims into the established UTM Coordinates, which slowed down the period of transition. To address such conflicts, in May 1996, the Mining Properties Mapping Law was enacted.enacted in May 1996. The Mining Properties Mapping Law established a new mapping system to identify the land area of mining claims and to set forth a procedure to resolve such conflicts and to recognize the rights held by holders of mining concessions and provisional permits claimed from colonial times until 1991. Under this law, to establish mining concessions claimed from colonial times to 1991, the MEM publishes provisional UTM Coordi natesCoordin ates with respect to such mining concessions inEl Peruano (", or El Peruano"),Peruano, the official gazette of Peru, and requests that any objections to such provisional UTM Coordinates be made to the MEM within 90 days of such publication. A similar procedure has been established for provisional permits claimed from colonial times to 1991; however, an owner of such provisional permit must establish the area subject to such provisional permit in UTM Coordinates and, once such land area is established, MEM publishes such provisional UTM Coordinates in El Peruano, requesting that any objections to such provisional permit be made to the MEM within 120 days of such publication and before the granting of the mining concession. Mining concessions applied for after 1991 under the UTM Coordinates system have been placed into the new mapping system and do not have to follow the procedure described above.

Mining concessions have an indefinite term, subject to payment of (a) an annual concession fee of US$3 per hectare claimed and (b) an annual fine if a minimum annual production of US$100 per hectare is not achieved before the expiration of the sixth year, counted from the year in which the title of the concession is granted, of US$6 per hectare will be payable starting in the seventh year following the year in which the title of the concession was granted until the year in which such minimum annual production is achieved; and if the failure to comply with the minimum annual production continues after the eleventh year following the year in which the title of the concession was granted, the penalty will increase to US$20 per hectare starting in the twelfth year counted since the year in which the title of the concession was granted. The fine may be avoided, however, by demonstrating investments in the mining rights during the previous year of amounts more than ten times greater than the fin e to be paid. In order to calculate the production of and investment in each mining right, the titleholder may create an operating unit, (orUnidad Económica Administrativa), provided the mining rights are all within a radius of five kilometers. If, in any year, the concession fee is not paid, payment may be made the following year within the term provided for making such payment. Any payment made will be applied to the prior year if such prior year was not paid. Failure to pay such concession fees or fines for two consecutive years could result in the loss of one or more of the mining rights. However, mining and processing concessions will not lapse if the administrative authority failed to issue a resolution declaring the termination of the concession within the first five years following the date on which such payment failure occurred. Processing concessions have an indefinite term, subject to payment of a fee based on nominal capacity for the processing plant. No other payments or royalties area re required by the Peruvian government for the Companyus to maintain mining and exploration property rights in full force and effect. As of 2002, the annual concession fee and the annual fine will be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the General Mining Law and of Supreme Decree No. 010-2002-EM, effective since March 10, 2002. The CompanyWe paid approximately US$2.02.1 million, US$2.12.5 million and US$2.52.7 million in fees for mining rights for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively, approximately US$4,687,5,646, US$7,9846,327 and US$8.4 million in6,475 fees for processing concessions, respectively, and isare current in the payment of all amounts due in respect of itsour mining rights and processing concessions.

As of April 30, 2005, the Company,May 29, 2006, we own and administer, directly and indirectly, through subsidiaries or in conjunction with joint venture partners, owns and administers approximately 795,863819,394 hectares devoted to mineral exploration and mining operations. Mining rights related to the current operations are provisional permits or mining concessions. Almost all of the mining rights related to the current operations already are provisional permits or mining concessions. The mining rights and processing concessions are in full force and effect under applicable Peruvian laws. The Company believesWe believe that it iswe are in compliance with all material terms and requirements applicable to the mining rights and processing concessions and that it iswe are not subject to any condition, occurrence or event that would cause the revocation, cancellation, lapse, expiration or termination thereof, except that the Companywe may, from time to time, allow to lapse, revoke, cancel or terminate mining rights and processing concessions that are not ma terialmaterial to the conduct of its business.our b usiness. The principal mining rights and processing concessions are (i) with respect to the Company'sour mines, new applications filed for provisional permits and mining concessions at Julcani, Uchucchacua, Orcopampa, Colquijirca, Ishihuinca, Antapite Paula and Shila;Shila-Paula; and (ii) with respect to the Company'sour current exploration projects, new applications filed for mining concessions, the provisional permits and the mining concessions at the Tantahuatay project, the Ayacucho project, the Totoral project and the Huancavelica project. The principal processing concessions are the processing concessions of the concentrators at Julcani, Uchucchacua, Orcopampa, Colquijirca, Ishihuinca, Antapite Paula and Shila.Shila-Paula.

Both mining concessions and provisional permits claimed before 1991 conferred on their holders the right to explore and develop themine underground mineral resources,ore reserves, and it is often the case that the titleholders of these mining rights are not the owners of the land surface. Since October 1996, pursuant to Peruvian regulations, all operators of new mining areas in Peru are required to have an agreement with the owners of the land surface above the mining rights or to establish an easement upon such surface for mining purposes pursuant to General Mining Law, Article 7 of Law No. 26505, as amended by Law No. 26570 and the regulations to such Article 7 contained in Supreme Decree 017-96-AG, as amended by Supreme Decree No. 015-2003-AG. The Company hasWe have been actively pursuing the acquisition of the land surface or obtaining easements relating to land positions containing prospective geological exploration targets,target sites, deposits that can be exploited in the future or areas that would be considered for p lantplant or facility sites.si tes.

On December 19, 1998, Special Law No. 27015, the Law Regulating Mining Concessions in Urban Areas and Urban Expansion Areas, was released. Law No. 27015 was amended by Law No. 27560, released oneffective as of November 24,25, 2001 (Law No. 27015 as amended by Law No. 27560, the "UrbanUrban Mining Concessions Law")Law). Regulations pursuant to the Urban Mining Concessions Law were set forth in Supreme Decree No. 007-99-EM published on March 22, 1999, which was abrogated and replaced by Supreme Decree No. 008-2002-EM, dated as ofeffective since February 21,22, 2002, (the "Regulations").or the Regulations. Under the Urban Mining Concessions Law, metallic or non-metallic mining concessions will be granted in areas that have been or are designated as urban areas by means of municipal ordinances issued by the Provincial Municipality pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Regulations for the Territorial Conditioning, Urban Development and Environment approved by Supreme Decree No. 007-85-VC, unless the grant of such title or concession is expressly authori zedauthorize d by a special law. SuchThis Supreme Decree was abrogated by Article 2 of Supreme Decree No. 027-2003-Vivienda, published on October 6, 2003, which contains2003. Article 1 of the same Supreme Decree approved the new Regulations for the Territorial Conditioning, Urban Development and Environment currently in effect.

The granting of titles to metallic and non-metallic mining concessions in an area designated as an urban expansion area by means of municipal ordinances in force as of the date of filing of an application for a mining concession requires authorization through a Ministerial Resolution. The issuance of a Ministerial Resolution requires the receipt of a resolution of the Cabinet of the applicable Provincial Municipality, which will be issued within a period of sixty days. If the opinion is negative or if no opinion is issued, the application for the mining concession will be rejected. Any change from a metallic concession to a non-metallic concession and vice versa will be subject to these same requirements.

Applications for concessions in urban expansion areas will be presented on the basis of increments of 10 to 100 hectares under the UTM Coordinates system.

A mining concession in an urban expansion area, whether metallic or non-metallic, will be granted for a term of 10 years, renewable for like terms under the procedures set forth above for the grant of the initial concession. In both urban areas or urban expansion areas the only legally valid easements for mining purposes are those which are entered into directly with the owner of the surface area.

In order to begin exploration activities, holders of mining concessions in urban areas or urban expansion areas must comply with the provisions of the Environmental Regulations for Mining Exploration Activities set forth in Supreme Decree No. 038-98-EM. To begin developmentexploration activities, holders of mining concessions in urban areas or urban expansion areas must comply with the Regulations of Title Fifteenth of the General Mining Law, Regulations for Environmental Protection of the Mining and Metallurgical Activities set forth in Supreme Decree No. 016-93-EM, as amended and supplemented by Supreme Decrees Nos. 059-93-EM, 029-99-EM and 022-2002-EM, as well as with the provisions contained in the Safety and Hygienic Regulations for Mining Activities set forth in Supreme Decree No. 046-2001-EM published on July 26, 2001, as amended by Supreme Decree No. 018-2003-EM published oneffective May 31, 2003 and Supreme Decree No. 046-2005-EM, effective as of October 30, 2003.2005. Failure to comply with the provisionspr ovisions of the Regulations may be punished with a fine or by the tempo rarytemporary suspension of mining activities. If the failure continues, the mining concession may be revoked.

Law No. 27474 was publishedbecame effective on June 6,7, 2001, and replaced Law No. 25763, the purpose of which was to ensure that mining, power and hydrocarbons obligations be audited by auditing companies duly registered with the MEM. Pursuant to Law No. 27474 and its Regulations approved by Supreme Decree No. 049-2001-EM, as amended by Supreme Decree No. 018-2003-EM and Supreme Decree No. 058-2005-EM, effective as of December 4, 2005, the MEM is now in charge of auditing the fulfillment of the obligations contained in the General Mining Law and its Regulations, including technical, economic, financing and administrative obligations, as well as safety and environmental obligations. The MEM may perform audits either with its own personnel or through individuals or companies registered with the MEM to provide external audit services.

Environmental Matters

On September 8, 1990, a new regime of environmental laws, codified in Legislative Decree 613, was enacted in Peru. On June 2, 1992, new environmental laws, codified in Title 15 of the General Mining Law, relating to the mining industry were enacted. These laws and the related regulations significantly increased the level of environmental regulation previously in effect in Peru and established standards as well as guidelines with respect to particulate emissions in the air, water quality, exploration, tailings and water discharges, among other requirements. As of 1998, environmental quality standards enforceable for all economic activities have to be in line with the provisions set forth by Supreme Decree No. 044-98-PCM. In 2005, the General Environmental Law (Law No. 28611) was passed, which incorporated a number of environmental management guidelines relating mainly to emissions standards.

The MEM monitors environmental compliance and sets specific environmental standards. In particular, the MEM has established standards for emissions or discharges of liquid and gas effluents. The MEM also approves the environmental impact assessments and programs for environmental control.

The MEM has issued regulations that establish maximum permissible levels of emissions of liquid effluents approved byMinisterial Resolution No. 011/96-EM/VMM. Generally, holders of mining rights and processing plants that were in operation prior to May 2, 1993 have a maximum of 10 years to comply with the maximum permissible levels; in the meantime, they must prepare theirProgramas de Adecuación y Manejo Ambiental (Environmental Adaptation and Management Schedules, or "PAMAs")PAMAs) to comply with more stringent maximum permissible levels. Under Peruvian environmental regulations that were passed in 1993, a company that initiated operations prior to May 2, 1993, as is the case for the Companyus and most of itsour affiliated companies, was required to file with the Peruvian government a Preliminary Environmental Evaluation, oranEvaluación Ambiental Preliminar ("EVAP")(Preliminary Environmental Evaluation, or EVAP) for each of its mining units to disclose any pollution problems in its operations and, thereaft er,t hereafter, to submit a follow-up filing of a PAMA to detail explanations of how such companies will comply with these less stringent maximum permissible levels for liquid effluents and other environmental problems. Companies must correct the pollution problems relating to their mining activities within five years and relating to their processing plants within five or ten years, depending on the type of processing plant. These companies must allocate no less than one percent of their annual sales to redress the problems identified in their EVAPs and contemplated in their PAMAs. Mining and plant processing activities that began after May 2, 1993 or had at that time a specific environmental program will be required to file and obtain approval for an Environmental Impact Study, ("EIS")or EIS, before being authorized to operate. Mining and plant processing activities that began after May 2, 1993 are required to comply with the more stringent maximum permissible levels for liquid effluents from the initiation of their operations.op erations. Exploration activities, classified as either initial, intermediate and advanced, are also subject to heightened compliance requirements. Unlike initial exploration projects, which do not require MEM approval, intermediate exploration projects must submit a Sworn Declaration, ("SD"),or SD, after which the MEM has 20 calendar days to raise objections to such SD. If no objection is raised, the SD will be deemed approved. Furthermore, advanced exploration projects are required to submit an Environmental Assessment, ("EA"),or EA, which incorporates technical, environmental and social matters. If objections are not raised by the MEM to the EA, such EA is deemed approved. Commitments assumed by the mining company in the SDs and EAs are obligatory for such mining companies and enforceable by the MEM.

Many of the Company'sour mining rights and processing plants were in operation prior to May 2, 1993, and the Company iswe are in substantial compliance with the interim maximum permissible levels. EVAPs for Julcani, Uchucchacua, Orcopampa, Recuperada, Ishihuinca and Shila were all accepted between August and September 1995. The EISs for Huallanca and Paula were approved in 1998 and February 2001, respectively. Between November 2002 and April 2003, the MEM approved and verified the PAMAs for all these entities, issuing an approving resolution for each respective mining unit.

The EAs for the La Zanja, Los Pircos, Tantahuatay and Samana exploration projects were approved in July 2001, August 2001, December 2000 and December 2001 respectively. EAs for JatunHatun Orcco, Ccarhuarazo, Salpo and Poracota were all accepted in 2003. The SDs for the Anamaray, Cofradia, El Milagro, Sican, Shilacocha and Trapiche projects and the EAs for the Esperanza, Hatun Orco, Layo, La Zanja, Mallay, Minasnioc, Pampa Andino, Pircos, Pozo Rico, Soras, Tantahuatay and Poracota projects were approved in 2005 and early 2006.

In October 2001, Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A. ("Conenhua"), or Conenhua, completed the construction of two transmission lines, one between Trujillo and Cajamarca and the other between Cajamarca Norte and La Pajuela, and of a substation in Cajamarca Norte, in order to provide electricity to Yanacocha and the city of Cajamarca. The final concessions for the two transmission lines were granted by Supreme Resolution No. 165-2001-EM in October 2001.

In 2001, the Companywe submitted an EIS for a transmission line from Ares to Huancarama, which will connect Orcopampa with the national electricity grid. Orcopampa was connected to the Peruvian national electricity grid on September 12, 2002 and Minera Shila S.A.C. was connected on April 9, 2003.

Except as described above, there are no material legal or administrative proceedings pending against the Companyus with respect to any environmental matters.

Law No. 28090, Law that Rules the Closing of Mines (Ley que Regula el Cierre de Minas) (Law that Regulates the Closing of Mines), was published on October 14, 2003, establishing the obligations and procedures that mining companies willmust follow to prepare, submit and execute the planplans for the closing of mines, (the "Plan")or Closure Plans, and the granting of environmental guarantees to secure compliance with the Plan.Closure Plans. Pursuant to Law No. 28090, as amended by Law No. 28507, published on May 8, 2005 and the Company isMine Closure Regulations approved by Supreme Decree 033-2005-EM, published on August 15, 2005, we are required to (i) submit a Closure Plan for "New Projects" to the MEM within one year following approval of the EIS or PAMA, or in the case of mining or processing concessions in operations,"Existing Projects", one year after August 15, 2005; (ii) submit a modification to the RegulationsClosure Plan to such Law No. 28090 become effective; (ii)the MEM within nine months after August 15, 2005; (iii) inform the MEM semi-annually of any progress on the conditions established in the Closure Plan; (iii)(iv) perform theth e Closure Plan consistent with the schedule approved by the MEM during the life of the concession; and (iv)(v) grant an environmental guarantee that covers the estimated amount of the Closure Plan. The guarantee may be in cash, trusts, and any other guarantee contemplated in the Banking Law. On November 24, 2003, Ministerial Resolution No. 627-2003-MEM/DM was published to create the Registry for Authorized Entities to Elaborate the Closing of Mines and the Beneficial Plants (Registro de Entidades Autorizadas a Elaborar Planes de Cierre de Mina y de Plantas de Beneficio)(Registry for Authorized Entities to Elaborate the Closing of Mines and the Beneficial Plants). Only the entities recorded in such registry are allowed to prepare the Plan. Pursuant to LawThe Mine Closure By-Law, Supreme Decree No. 28507,033-2005-EM, passed on August 15, 2005, deals with the Regulations to Law No. 28090 will be issued in a sixty-day term aseffects on health, safety, property and the environment at the end of May 8, 2005.the productive life of mining-related facilities.

Law No. 28271, Law that Rules the Mining Liabilities of the Mining Activities (Ley que Regula los Pasivos Ambientales de la Actividad Minera) (Law that Regulates the Mining Liabilities of the Mining Activities), was publishedbecame effective on July 6,7, 2004 to regulate the identification of liabilities in mining activity and financial responsibility for remediation, in each case to mitigate any negative impact mining may have with respect to the health of the population, environment and property. ThePursuant to Law No. 28271, as amended by Law No. 28526, published on May 25, 2005 and the Mining Environmental Liabilities Regulations approved by Supreme Decree 059-2005-EM, published on December 8, 2005, the technical office of the MEM will identify environmental liabilities, mining companies responsible for abandoned mining facilities, mining works and residue deposits that may be linked to such environmental liabilities and holders of inactive mining concessions with mining liabilities. Holders of inactive mining concessions with environmentalenvironmen tal mining liabilities will be required to submit a plan for the closing of the mine or the cancellation of its mining concessionClosure Plan within one year fromof their identification and notification as holders of inactive mining concessions with environmental mining liabilities. The Peruvian government will only assume the environmental mining liabilities of unidentified holders. In addition, holders will enter into environmental remediation agreements with the MEM, acting through the Environmental General Department, to perform any studies and work necessary to control and mitigate the risk and effects of any contamination, which will be financed by theFondo Nacional del Ambiente - FONAM. A plan for the closing of a mineClosure Plan must be performedexecuted within three years of its approval by the Environmental General Department.Department, although the Environmental General Department has the authority to establish an additional two-year term for those cases with extreme environmental mining liabilities.

The Company anticipatesWe anticipate additional laws and regulations will be enacted over time with respect to environmental matters. The development of more stringent environmental protection programs in Peru could impose constraints and additional costs on the Company'sour operations, and the Companywe would be required to make significant additional capital expenditures in the future. Although the Company believeswe believe that it iswe are substantially in compliance with all applicable environmental regulations of which it iswe are now aware, there is no assurance that future legislation or regulatory developments will not have an adverse effect on itsour business or results of operations.

Permits

Management believesWe believe that the Company'sour mines and facilities have all necessary material permits. All future exploration and development projects require or will require a variety of permits. Although the Company believeswe believe the permits for these projects can be obtained in a timely fashion, permitting procedures are complex, time-consuming and subject to potential regulatory delay. The CompanyWe cannot predict whether itwe will be able to renew itsour existing permits or whether material changes in existing permitting conditions will be imposed. Non-renewal of existing permits or the imposition of additional conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Company'sour financial condition or results of operations.

Insurance

The Company maintainsWe maintain a comprehensive insurance program designed to address the specific risks associated with itsour operations, in addition to covering the normal insured risks encountered by major mining companies.

The Company's Our insurance program is provided through the local Peruvian insurance market and includes employers' liability, comprehensive third party general liability, comprehensive automobile liability, all risk property on a replacement basis, including transit risks, business interruption insurance and mining equipment.

Mining Royalties

Article 20 of Law No. 26821,Ley Orgánica para el Aprovechamiento Sostenible de los Recursos Naturales,establishes that private companies must pay compensation to the Peruvian government for the economic use of natural resources. Law No. 28258, published on June 24, 2004 and amended by Law No. 29323, created a mining royalty (regalia minera) that holders of mining concessions must pay on a monthly basis to the Peruvian government for the exploitation of metallic and non-metallic resources. The royalty, which is the compensation referred to in Article 20 of Law No. 26821,Ley Orgánica para el Aprovechamiento Sostenible de los Recursos Naturales, is not considered a tax. However, it will be included in the scope of the Mining Law Stabilization Agreements and mining companies that are taxpayers and are party to such Stabilization Agreements will not have to pay this compensation or royalty during the life of their StabilizationStabiliza tion Agreements. Although the Company iswe are not party to a Stabilization Agreement, Yanacocha has entered into Mining Law Stabilization Agreements under the General Mining Law with the Peruvian government. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Yanacocha-Operating Results".

The royalty is calculated on revenue from sales of product (based on the international market price) less certain refining and transportation expenses. The mining royalty to be paid for ore concentrates with a value (i) up to US$60 million per year, is 1 percent of such value, (ii) between US$60 million and US$120 million per year, is 2 percent of such value and (ii) in excess of US$120 million per year, is 3 percent of such value. The MEM will publish the international market price of minerals and in the event that a mineral does not have an international market price, the mining royalty will be 1 percent of the mining component.

Organizational Structure

AtAs of May 26,2005, the Company29,2006, we conducted itsour mining operations directly and through various majority-owned subsidiaries, controlled companies and other affiliated companies as described in the following organizational chart.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A
Corporate Structure

Cia de Minas Buenaventura SAA

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----------

-

--------------------

-

--------------------------

-

------------------------

-

-------------------

-

-

-----

|

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

Buenaventura Ingenieros

 

 

 

Cia. Minera Condesa

-

------------------------

-

-------------------

-

|

 

|

-

78.04%

Inminsur

|

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

|

 

 

 

99.99%

55.17%

43.65%

|

|

Contacto Corredores de seguros

 

 

 

Cedimin

 

 

 

Minera Yanacocha

-

|

 

|

-

9.17%

Cerro Verde

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

-----------

-

--------------------------

-

------------

 

 

 

|

 

|

-

44.83%

Cedimin

 

 

|

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

|

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

40%

 

7.68%

 

|

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

Minas Conga

 

 

 

Chaupiloma

 

Cia de Minas Buenaventura

-

|

 

|

-

45.90%

Coshuro

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

 

|

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minas Conga

-

|

 

|

-

59.90%

Colquijirca

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

|

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01%

 

|

 

|

 

 

51.06%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conenhua

-

|

 

|

-

2.25%

Minera El Brocal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

99.99%

Minera Colquirrumi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

100%

Metalurgica Los Volcanes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

99.99%

Conenhua

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

40.09%

Minera Coimolache

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

20%

Chaupiloma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

10.00%

Ferrovias

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

53.06%

La Zanja

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

-

60%

Minasnioc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

            

|

 

- -----------

Santa Marina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

100%

 

Intermediate Holding Companies, Subsidiaries and Equity Participations

Compañía Minera Condesa S.A.

Condesa, wholly owned by the Company,us, is a mining and facilities holding company with direct and indirect ownership participation in two mining-related entities, Cedimin and Yanacocha, and in exploration projects conducted by Minas Conga and Conenhua. See "-Business Overview-Exploration". As a partner in Yanacocha, Condesa shares responsibility for the investments made in the Yanacocha mine and through its investment in Cediminreceives return dividend revenues. See "-S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca" below. Condesa also holds a 7.68 percent interest in the Company.us.

Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C.

Cedimin, wholly owned by the Company,us, is a mining and facilities holding company. At December 31, 2004,2005, Cedimin held a 40 percent participation in Minas Conga, and a 40 percent interest in Chaupiloma.SeeChaupiloma. See "-The Company-History and Development" and "-S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca" below. See "-The Company-History and Development" for a description of the legal proceedings in the Peruvian courts concerning the ownership of certain shares of Cedimin originally held by BRGM. Through its direct ownership in Chaupiloma, Cedimin receives a portion of the royalty revenues paid by Yanacocha to Chaupiloma equal to such ownership interest.

As of January 2, 2003, Minera Shila S.A.C. merged with and into Cedimin. Due to Buenaventura's and Condesa's, Cedimin's shareholders, interests in Minera Shila prior toAs a result of the merger, their interestsour interest in Cedimin increased from 0.0009 percent and 99.9991 percent, respectively,before the merger to 44.83 percent after the merger, and Condesa's interest in Cedimin decreased from 99.9991 percent before the merger to 55.17 percent respectively, after the merger. In addition, on October 22, 2004, Cedimin acquired a 100 percent equity interest in Inversiones Mineras Aureas S.A.C. (", or Mineras Aureas"),Aureas, which had a 49 percent interest in Minera Paula 49 S.A.C. (", or Minera Paula").Paula. As a result of this acquisition, Minera Paula became wholly owned by the Company.us. As of December 31, 2004, Mineras Aureas and Minera Paula merged with and into Cedimin and are no longer separate legal entities.

S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

Chaupiloma is a Peruvian limited liability company that holds all of the mining rights for the areas mined by Yanacocha and Minas Conga. Chaupiloma receives a royalty that is calculated as a percentage of the total revenues of Yanacocha. The Company,We, Cedimin and Newmont Peru own a 20 percent interest, a 40 percent interest and a 40 percent interest, respectively, in Chaupiloma. The Company,We own, directly and indirectly, through itsour interest in Cedimin, owns a 60 percent interest in Chaupiloma.

Consorcio Energético Huancavelica S.A.

Conenhua is an electrical transmission company that provides a significant portion of theour electrical needs of the Company through its transmission facilities. The Company ownsWe own 100 percent of Conenhua and managesmanage its operations. Conenhua obtained the concession for power transmission in the Huancavelica area in 1983, enabling the Companyus to buy energy from Electro Perú and to transmit electric power to the Company'sour mining facilities through itsour own facilities. The provinces of Huancavelica, Angaraes, Acobamba and Castrovirreyna are now connected to the system. Conenhua also provides electric power to other mining companies in the area. In 2004,2005, Conenhua sold 11.617.5 million kilowatt hours, ("kWh")or kWh, in Huancavelica. Revenues generated by Conenhua benefit the Companyus in the form of operational costs savings at the rate of US$0.11 per kWh regarding thermoelectric generation costs. Conenhua has become the operator of Paragsha II-Ucchuchacua, the power line which provides electricity to t hethe Ucchuchacua mine and two other mines and, in 2004,2005, Conenhua provided 104.4118.8 million kWh to those mines. Conenhua also operates the Callalli-Ares power line, which in 2005 provided 46.8 million kWh to the Orcopampa and Shila-Paula mines. In 2003,addition, Conhehua agreed to provideprovides Inminsur with electricity, including electrical power service and maintenance and, in 2004,2005, Conenhua provided 15.1 million15.3million kWh to Inminsur. In 2004,2005, Conenhua provided 280.0330.6 million kWh to Yanacocha. Conenhua's revenues in 20042005 amounted to US$8.811.5 million.

Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A.

Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A. ("BISA"), aor BISA, one of our wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,subsidiaries, has provided mining sector geological, engineering, design and construction consulting services for the lastover 23 years. During this time, BISA has consulted in Peru, Chile, Argentina, Mexico and Ecuador on a range of projects, operations and expansions. In 1995, BISA created an environmental services group. BISA owns a 99.99 percent interest in Contacto Corredores de Seguros S.A., an insurance brokerage company that provides insurance brokerage and related services to the Companyus and itsour affiliates. In 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, BISA participated in 117, 170, 194 and 194181 projects, respectively, for domestic and international mining industry customers in Latin America, including the preparation of Environmental Impact Studies and Environmental Adaptation Programs. In 2004,2005, BISA's revenues amounted to US$8.16.2 million.

Sociedad Minera Coshuro S.A.

Coshuro, which began operations in December 1995, was created jointly by the Companyus and Newmont Peru to conduct gold mining exploration in the Yanacocha volcanic belt. Coshuro was 35 percent owned by the Companyus until December 20, 2000, on which date Newmont Peru transferred 10.9 percent of its interest in the Coshuro to the Company.us. On August 13, 2002, Sociedad Minera Coshuro S.A. authorized the separation and transfer to the Companyus of all of the mining concessions granted to Coshuro pursuant to the Separation Agreement dated September 25, 2000. The mining concessions were transferred to Minera La Zanja S.R.L. (", or Minera La Zanja"),Zanja, incorporated in July 2004, in which the Companywe held a 35 percent interest.After July 2004, Minera La Zanja conducted a capital increase whereby the Company'sour interest in Minera La Zanja increased to 53.06 percent. As a result, the Companywe currently holdshold a 45.9 percent interest in Coshuro.

Inversiones Colquijirca S.A. / Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

The Colquijirca mine is wholly owned by El Brocal. El Brocal was formed in 1956 and is engaged in the extraction, concentration and sale of concentrates of polymetallic minerals, mainly zinc, lead and silver. At December 31, 2002, the Companywe held a 59.02 percent interest in Inversions Colquijirca and a 32.83 percent interest in El Brocal's mining properties. Other unrelated mining investors hold the balance of the share capital of Inversiones Colquijirca. In January 2003, El Brocal conducted a US$11.0 million capital increase to finance the exploration of the Marcapunta deposit, reduction of the arsenic content and enhancement of the gold content of the deposit's copper resources. The CompanyWe participated in this capital share increase by exercising itsour and TCL'sTeck Cominco's interest in El Brocal, through each of their interests in Inversiones Colquijirca, to invest approximately S/.1,500,000. As a result, the Company'sour interest in Inversiones Colquijirca increased from 59.02 percent to 59.90 percen t.percent. In August 2005 , we purchased additional shares of Investiones Colquijirca, increasing our interest from 59.90 percent to 61.42 percent.

Ferrovías Central Andino S.A.

The Company holdsWe hold 10 percent of Ferrovías Central Andino S.A. (", or Ferrovías"),as, a railroad company, pursuant to a concession granted to a consortium of several companies in April 2000. Among the other companies holding interests in the share capital of Ferrovías are Railroad Development Corporation, Cemento Andino S.A., Commonwealth Development Corporation and others. Ferrovías will provide transportation for concentrates from El Brocal's mining operations at a lower cost.

Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.

The Company holdsWe hold a 9.1718.5 percent interest in Cerro Verde, which owns the Cerro Verde copper deposit located approximately 1,100 kilometers southeast of Lima. The Peruvian government previously owned and operated the mine. In November 1993, the Cerro Verde operation was privatized. Cyprus Amax (now Phelps Dodge Corporation, ("or Phelps Dodge"))Dodge) bought 91.7 percent and, pursuant to Peruvian privatization laws, the employees of Cerro Verde purchased approximately 8.3 percent of the shares of Cerro Verde. Cyprus Amax paid US$35.44 million for its equity interest in Cerro Verde and made a US$485 million capital commitment to finance the developmentconstruction of the facilities. In 2002, Cerro Verde obtained ISO 14001 certification. Phelps Dodge is currently the operator and senior partner (82.5 percent) of Cerro Verde. In 2004,2005, the mine produced 88,50293,252 metric tons of copper cathodes, compared to 87,336metric88,502metric tons produced in 2003.2004. It is estimated that Cerro Verde contains over 7.1 million met ricmetric tons of recoverable copper and over 20,000 hectares of mining concessions in its mining district.

On March 16,June 1, 2005, Cerro Verde completed a capital increase. As a result of the Company,capital increase, Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., and Sumitomo Corporation Summit Global Management B.V., Phelps Dodge, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Cyprus Metals Company, Cyprus Climax Metals Company andacquired a 21 percent equity interest in Cerro Verde entered into an agreement whereby, subject to certain closing conditions, the Company agreed to increase its ownershipVerde. In addition, we increased our equity interest in Cerro Verde upfrom 9.17 percent to 20.118.21 percent. The remaining minority shareholders own 7.2 percent of Cerro Verde through shares publicly traded on the Lima Stock Exchange. As a result of the transaction, Cerro Verde received US$441.8 million in cash and Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Corporation and Summit Global Management B.V. (the "Sumitomo Group") agreed to acquire an ownershipPhelps Dodge's interest in Cerro Verde of between 21.0 and 24.99was reduced to 53.6 percent from 82.5 percent. Phelps Dodge will retaincontinues to maintain a majority interest in Cerro Verde. Since June 1, 2005, we have purchased additional common shares in Cerro Verde intends effect an increase in the Company's and the Sumitomo Group's ownership interests pursuant to a capital increase. Actual ownership percentages are contingent upon the number of shareholders who own shares of Cerro Verde, which are traded on the Lima Stock Exchange.Exchange, increasing our interest to 18.5 percent.

The Company expects to invest, from internally generated funds, up to approximately US$175 millioninIn February 2005, the board of directors of Cerro Verde which will partially finance aapproved an approximate US$850 million expansion and financing of the Cerro Verde operationmine. On September 30, 2005, Cerro Verde obtained in connection with such financing, debt-financing facilities in an overall amount of US$450 million, subject to mine a primary sulfide ore body.certain conditions precedent. The cash invested by us and Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. and Ltd. and Sumitomo Corporation in connection with the capital increase financed approximately US$300 million of the primary sulfide ore body is expected to begin in late 2006.expansion for the year ended December 31, 2005. The current copper production at Cerro Verde currently producesis approximately 100,000 metric tons per year of copper per year, whichcathode. After completion of the expansion copper production is expected to increase to approximately 300,000 metric tons per year following the expansion.year.

YANACOCHA

Overview

Founded in Peru in 1992, Yanacocha is the largest gold producer in Latin America. Yanacocha produced 3,017,3023,333,088 ounces of gold in 2004,2005, its eleventhtwelfth full year of operations. Yanacocha's operations are located in the Andes mountains in Northern Peru in the area of Cajamarca, located approximately 900 kilometers north of Lima and 45 kilometers north of the City of Cajamarca at an altitude of 4,000 meters above sea level. As of December 31, 2004,2005, Yanacocha's proven and probable reserves (excluding Minas Conga's proven and probable reserves) were estimated to be 23.520.78 million ounces of gold representing a 25.811.57 percent decrease over Yanacocha's proven and probable reserves, which were estimated to be 31.723.5 million ounces of gold as of December 31, 2003.2004. The decrease in reserves of gold was mainly due to thea mining depletion of 3.94.74 million ounces of gold due to mining, the reclassification of 4.2 million ounces of gold reserves (3.9 million ounces from the Cerro Quilish deposit and 0.3 million oun ces from the Cerro Negro deposit) to Mineralized Material not in Reserve ("NRM") and an increase of 1.6a reserve revisionof 0.89 million ounces of gold reserves, partially off-setoffset by the depletionan increase of 1.72.86 million ounces of gold reserves due to an increasesincreas e in the price of gold increased costs, increased royalties for new pits and updated grade andin recovery models. As of December 31, 2004,2005, Minas Conga's proven and probable reserves were estimated to be 8.711.8 million ounces of gold and 2.23.2 billion pounds of copper. Minas Conga reported no proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 2003.copper, representing a 35.4 percent increase from estimated 2004 gold reserves. The increase in reserves of gold and copper was due to additional drilling in 2005, along with an increase in the reclassification ofbase price for proven and probable gold to NRM. Therefore, asand copper reserve estimates and decreased processing cost estimates at both Perol and Chailhuagon. As of December 31, 2004,2005, Yanacocha's total proven and probable reserves (including Minas Conga) were estimated to be 32.332.6 million ounces of gold, representing a 1.7%0.9 percent increase over Yanacocha's total proven and probable reserves, which were estimated to be 31.732.3 million ounces of gold as of December 31, 2003.2004. Yanacocha's total proven and prob ableprobable reserves of copper were 2.23.2 billion pounds as of December 31, 2004.2005.

The Commission terms a subset of global resources as NRM. During 2004, certain NRM material at Minas Conga was recategorized as reserve material. Proven and probable reserves are based on extensive drilling, sampling, mine modeling and metallurgical testing from which economic feasibility has been determined. Under the Management Contract (as defined below), Newmont Peru, in conjunction with Yanacocha, calculates Yanacocha's reserves by methods generally applied within the mining industry and in accordance with existing regulations. Reserves represent estimated quantities of proven and probable ore that, under present and anticipated conditions, may be economically mined and processed. As of December 31, 2004,2005, Yanacocha's gold NRM was 5.98.59 million ounces, representing a 6445.6 percent increase from Yanacocha's gold NRM of 3.65.9 million ounces as of December 31, 2003.2004. Newmont Peru has not quoted silver reserves at Yanacocha for the last year due to recovery issues. In 2005, NRM was calculated at US$425 per ounce of gold and US$1.10 per pound of copper, compared to US$375 per ounce of gold and US$1.00 per pound of copper in 2004.

Yanacocha has the right to useYanacocha's exploration activities encompass 262,792 hectares covered by 409 mining rights with respect to 176,208 hectares of land.concessions. Chaupiloma holds certain of the mining rights with respect to these hectares and has assigned the mining rights related to 108,089110,560 hectares to Yanacocha, covered by 183182 mining concessions and fiveseven provisional permits. Although Chaupiloma has not assigned the mining rights to the remaining hectares to Yanacocha, Chaupiloma permits Yanacocha to explore these hectares. Of the 183182 mining concessions assigned to Yanacocha, approximately 1718 are currently used in mining operations and the remaining mining concessions are being explored by Yanacocha. See "-Mining and Processing Concessions". Yanacocha has acquired all surface rights with respect to 15,23013,401 hectares of surface land covering its Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San Jose, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua (which includes the Cerro Negro deposit) mining operations, and a majority of the Cerro Quilish deposit. In addition, Yanacocha has acquired 4,5224,618 hectares of surface rights with respect to the Minas Conga deposit.deposit, 2,975 hectares for the Solitario-San Cirilo and Lagunas prospects, and 337 hectares for future land swaps, making a total of 21,331 hectares acquired to December 2005.

In 1994, its first full year of production, Yanacocha produced 304,552 ounces of gold. In 2000,2001, Yanacocha produced 1,795,3981,902,489 ounces of gold, 1,902,489 ounces in 2001, 2,285,584 ounces in 2002, 2,851,143 ounces in 2003, and 3,017,303 ounces in 2004.2004 and 3,333,088 ounces in 2005. Yanacocha expects production to decrease by 322 percent percent from the 20042005 production level to 2,932,0002,600,000 ounces in 2005.2006. Yanacocha believes that it was one of the world's lowest cash cost gold producers in 2004,2005, with a cash cost per ounce of gold sold of US$146.150. Yanacocha's cash cost per ounce of gold sold was US$146 in 2004, US$129 in 2003, US$134 in 2002 and US$123 in 2001 and US$96 in 2000.2001.

Yanacocha expects production of silver toincrease 2todecrease 14 percent from the 20042005 production level to 3,563,2543.7 million ounces in 2005.2006. Yanacocha reduces the cash cost of gold with sales of silver, which is considered a by-product. Silver production was 24,467 ounces in 1993, Yanacocha's first full year of production, 1,536,587 ounces in 2000, 1,466,172 ounces in 2001, 1,921,670 ounces in 2002, 3,035,275 ounces in 2003, and 3,479,436 ounces in 2004.2004 and 4,342,292 ounces in 2005.

Yanacocha is owned 51.35 percent by Newmont Mining, through its wholly owned subsidiary Newmont Second, 43.65 percent by the Companyus through itsour 100 percent owned subsidiary Condesa, and 5 percent by IFC. Yanacocha is managed by Newmont Peru. See "-Management of Yanacocha-General Manager/Management Agreement". Since 1992, aggregate capital contributions of US$2.3 million have been made by Condesa, Newmont Second and IFC to Yanacocha. Although Yanacocha did not pay dividends during its development years, 1992 through 1994, cash dividends were distributed from 1995 to 1999. In 2000, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$60 million in dividends in respect of 2000 earnings and increased its property, plant andequipment reinvestment program by US$71 million. The reinvestment program totaled US$193 million at December 31, 2000, which amount was capitalized during 2001.2000. In 2001, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$10 million in dividends in respect of 2000 earnings and electe delected to reinvest US$80 million from 2001 profits based on a new reinvestment program for the years 2001 to 2004. In December 2001, the MEM approved the 1998 reinvestment program (increased in 1999) for US$206.5 million. As a result, an additional US$13.5 million was capitalized. In 2002, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amountamo unt of US$50.7 million in dividends in respect of 2001 earnings and elected to reinvest US$80 million from 2002 profits. In 2003, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$300 million in dividends in respect of 2002 earnings and elected to reinvest US$29.6 million from 2003 profits. See the Statements of Changes in Partners Equity in the Yanacocha Financial Statements on page F-70 and "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Yanacocha-Operating Results". In 2004, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$280 million in dividends in respect of 2003 earnings and completed all investments under its reinvestment program from 2000-2004. See the Statements of Changes in Partners Equity in the Yanacocha Financial Statements on page F-57 and "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Yanacocha-Operating Results". In 2005, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$180 million in dividends in respect of 2004 earnings. Undistributed earnings associated with the reinvestment program are presented as restricted earnings as of December 2002,31, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005.

On October 31, 1999, pursuant to a public deed, Yanacocha changed its legal structure from a corporation to a partnership, changing its name from "Minera Yanacocha S.A." to "Minera Yanacocha S.R.L." As a result, Yanacocha (i) cannot have more than 20 partners; (ii) its capital stock is represented in participations; (iii) is not required to maintain a legal reserve (see Note 11 to Yanacocha Financial Statements); and (iv) will not receive a different income tax treatment under Peruvian law than it did as a corporation.

Capital Expenditures

Yanacocha's capital expenditures from its formation in 1992 through 20042005 have related principally to the developmentconstruction of the Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua mining operations, the construction of the two plants at Carachugo and Yanacocha that include a leach solution processing facility and a smelter at each plant, the construction of four carbon column plants at Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua, the acquisition of both new and used mining equipment, the construction of two dams, and the expansionseveral expansions of the four leach pads forlocated at the Carachugo, and Maqui Maqui, mining operations and for the Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua mining sites.operations. Yanacocha's capital expenditures from its formation through December 31, 20042005 totaled approximately US$1,640.11,870.2 million, including capital expenditures of US$145.8 million in 2002, US$194.2 million in 2003, and US$237.2 million in 2004.2004 and US$230.1 million in 2005. Capital expenditures in 2005 included an investment of US$73 million for mine and leach pad construction, US$12 million for environmental site and regional water management projects, US$30 million for mining equipment, US$17 million for the Minas Conga project and US$98 million related to other ongoing expansions. Capital expenditures in 2004 included an investment of US$93.5 million for mine and leach pa d development,pad construction, US$20.4 million for environmental site and regional water management projects, US$36.8 million for mining equipment and US$86.5 million for work related to other onglingongoing expansions. Capital expenditures in 2003 included an investment of US$93.2 million for mine and leach pad development,construction, US$24.4 million for environmental site and regional water management projects, US$30.3 million for mining equipment and US$46.3 million for work related to other ongoing expansions. Capital expenditures in 2002 included an investment of US$85.9 million for leach pad expansions, US$16.7 million for mining development, US$14.3 million for environmental projects and US$12.9 million for carbon column and refinery development and other replacement capital. See "-The Company-History and Development".

Yanacocha anticipates that its capital expenditures for 20052006 will be approximately US$263.7327 million, (including the capitalized exploration costs referred to above), which Yanacocha plans to use primarily in the completion of the leach pad expansion at La Carachugo (Stage 10), the initiation of additional leach pad expansions at and La Quinua (Stage 5) and Yanacocha (Stage 7)6), the continuation of the site widesite-wide management plan to control sediment and chemistry, the continuationchemicals, installation of the implementation of membrane technology ina reverse osmosis plant for excess water treatment plants, the commencementat Pampa Larga, continuation of the Yanacocha Mill Projectproject and Minas Conga Project,project, development of the Chaquicocha deposit, construction of an alternate road (Kuntur Wasi) to the Laguna Compuertas damcoast of Peru, and the La Quinua chemical and matellurgical laboratory, the acquisition of heavy mining equipment and miscellaneous mining equipment, and the construction of carbon column facilities at Carachugo as part of the inventory reduction plan.equipment. The Yanacocha Gold Mill facility, ("YGM")or YGM, will provide a process alternative to exploit high grade oxide ore and sulfide ores which are not amenable to heap leaching thoughthrough a grinding circuit classification, followed by pre-leach thickening, a 24 hour24-hour leaching process, and counter currentcountercurrent decantation. Since YGM will be located within the currentcurr ent Minera Yanacocha operating area, it will maximize utilization of existing infrastructure at La Quinua. Minas Conga currently consists of two gold-copper porphyry deposits located northeast of Minera Yanacocha's operating area in the provinces of Celendin, Cajamarca and Hualgayoc. This project, incorporated to reserves in 2004, added 8.7reported 11.8 million ounces of gold reserves and 2.23.2 billion pounds of copper to reserves in 2004.2005.

Yanacocha expects that it will meet its working capital, capital expenditure and exploration and development requirements for the next several years from internally-generated funds, cash on hand and financing from banks and financial institutions. There can be no assurance that sufficient funding will be available to Yanacocha from internal or external sources to finance future working capital, capital expenditures and exploration and developmentconstruction requirements, or that external funding will be available for such purposes on terms or at prices favorable to Yanacocha. A very significant decline in the price of gold would be reasonably likely to affect the availability of such sources of liquidity. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Yanacocha-Exploration and Development Costs; Capital Expenditures".

Description of Yanacocha's Operations

As of December 31, 2004,2005, Yanacocha's business operations includedconsisted of five separate open-pit mines located at Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha San José and La Quinua, of which only two, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua, are currently in operation. Yanacocha's business operations also include a 410 million ton-capacity leach pad at the Carachugo mining site; a 60 million ton-capacity leach pad at the Maqui Maqui mining site; a 460 million ton-capacity leach pad at the Cerro Yanacocha mining site; a 400 million ton-capacity leach pad at the La Quinua mining site; two solution ponds and a storm water pond at the base of each leach pad. The Yanacocha site has two extra solution ponds attached to stage 6 plus a raw water pond to store excess solution during the wet season and La Quinua has an additional solution pond attached to stage 4 and processing plants at each of Pampa Larga, Yanacocha Norte and La Quinua. Primary smelting operations are now carried out at Yanacocha Norte, with the original sme lter at Pampa Larga remaining on a stand-by basis.Six water treatment plants (one a reverse osmosis facility) for excess process solution, and three plants for treatment of mine de-watering and dump run-off are spread across these facilities. The Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua mining areas began operations in August 1993, October 1994, January 1996, the last quarter of 1997 and October 2001, respectively. The Carachugo and San José mining operations are located within two kilometers of each other and share the same leach pad and solution ponds. The same processing plant (including a Merrill Crowe and carbon processing facility) and water treatment plants are shared by the Carachugo and Maqui Maqui mining operations. The Maqui Maqui mining operation, which is five kilometers from the Carachugo mining area, has its own leach pad and solution ponds. The Cerro Yanacocha mining operation has its own leach pad, solution ponds and processing plant (including a Merrill Crowe and carbon processing facility), but shares the smelter with the Carachugo mining operation. The La Quinua mining operation (which includes the smaller Cerro Negro deposit, production) has a leach pad, solution pondswhich commenced mining operations in 2004 and carbon processing facilities. Finally, La Quinua shares its Merrill Crowe processing facilities and smelter with Yanacocha Norte.ceased operations in 2005. The Maqui Maqui and San Jose open-pit mines temporarily ceased mining operations in 2000 and 2002, respectively. However, Maqui Maqui has reported new reserves and San JoseJosé has increased reserves as a result of an increase in the base price for proven and probable reserve estimates, from US$325 in 2003 to US$350 in 2004.2004 to US$400 in 2005.

AtLeach pads are located at Carachugo and(410 million ton-capacity), Maqui Maqui (60 million ton-capacity), Cerro Yanacocha ore(460 million ton-capacity) and La Quinua (400 million ton-capacity). Each of these leach pads includes two leach solution storage ponds and a storm water pond located at the base of each leach pad. The Cerro Yanacocha site has two extra solution ponds attached to Stage 6 as well as a raw water pond to store excess solution during the wet season. La Quinua has an additional solution pond attached to Stage 4.

Yanacocha has three processing facilities, which are located at Pampa Larga, Yanacocha Norte and La Quinua. The processing facilities can be used to process solution from any of the leach pads through a network of solution pumping facilities located near the solution storage ponds. The Pampa Larga facility includes Merrill Crowe and carbon column gold recovery plants and two conventional chlor-alkali water plants to allow treatment of excess process solution during the rainy season. The Pampa Larga facility also includes the original gold smelter, which is mined bykept for emergency standby purposes only. The Yanacocha Norte facility includes Merrill Crowe and carbon column gold recovery plants, a conventional chlor-alkali water plant and a reverse osmosis water plant to allow treatment of excess process solution during the rainy season. This facility also contains primary smelting and mercury retorting operations and an acid water treatment plant to allow neutralization of acid waters emanating f rom its mining operation and waste dumps prior to release into the environment. In addition, a slaking plant to provide lime for ensuring an alkaline pH on the pads and for water treatment purposes is located in close proximity to the facility. The La Quinua facility includes a carbon column gold recovery plant, an acid water treatment plant to allow neutralization of acid waters emanating from its mining operations and waste dumps prior to release into the environment, and a slaking plant to provide lime for ensuring an alkaline pH on the pads and for water treatment purposes.

Mining consists of a sequence of drilling, blasting, loading and haulinghauling. Ore containing gold is transported from each mine to the nearest active leach pads. The minedpad while waste is taken to specially designed storage facilities. Unlike Yanacocha's other mines, the ore isin the La Quinua mine contains clays and fine grain material which can inhibit the heap leaching process if not crushed or pre-treated becausehandled properly. Initially, the La Quinua mine utilized an ore crushing and agglomeration process to improve the permeability of the ore prior to stacking ore on the leach pad. In May 2004, this process was replaced with a more inexpensive method whereby the ore is porousre-excavated using hydraulic shovels to a depth of four meters to improve permeability. Improved ore control to ensure proper blending of fine and readily percolates barren solution and is in an oxide rather than sulfide material. Therefore,coarse grained ore is transported directly froman integral part of this process.

Ore is leached by introducing dilute solutions of cyanide through an irrigation system placed on top of the open-pit mines as run-of-mineore. This solution percolates through the ore, dissolving everything other than gold and silver, and results in a pregnant solution which drains to solution storage ponds to be transferred to the Carachugo leach pad, in the case of the Carachugo and San José mining operations, andnearest recovery facility. Carbon column gold recovery plants treat low grade solutions prior to the Cerro Yanacocha and Carachugo leach pads in the case of the Cerro Yanacocha mining operation. This allows for relatively rapid and inexpensive gold production because crushing or additional oxidation processing costs are not incurred. As of May 2004, the same mining process is conducted at La Quinua, except specific controls are placed on the percent of fine grained material that can be loaded onto each leach pad cell for permeability purposes. Priortheir delivery to May 2004, the La Quinua mining process involved the addition of cement and a belt agglomeration process. At both of the current mining operations, waste is dumped in nearby specially conditioned areas. Ore is heap-leached and the resulting pregnant solution is collected in each leach pad's solution ponds. Pregnant solution is pumped to the corresponding processing plant located near the Carachugo or Yanacocha leach pad. In order to enhance processing capacity, carbon column plants have been constructed at Pampa Larga, La Quinua and Yanacocha. Pregnant solution is enriched at this stage and then pumped to the Yanacocha Norte or Pampa Larga Merrill Crowe processing plants. At the processing plant, the gold is extracted using the Merrill Crowe plants. Solution from the carbon column gold recovery plants or high grade solutions from the leach pads are sent to the Merrill Crowe plants for gold extraction by a zinc precipitation process, and theprocess. The resulting gold concentrate is then smelted, producing doré bars currently assaying approximately 52 percent gold and 45 percent silver. The doré bars are transported from the processing plant by an outside security firm and refined outside of Peru. See "-Transportation and Refining". Barren soluti onThe solution from which the processing plantsgold is pumped backremoved (barren solution) is recy cled to the Cerro Yanacocha, La Quinua, Maqui Maqui and Carachugo leach pads for use in further heap-leaching.heap-leaching after having been reconstituted with cyanide. The leaching process is generally a closed system; however,system. However, during periods of high rainfall, additionalexcess water enters the process. This water ismust be treated at the facilities located at Yanacocha Norte and Pampa Larga, which have been designed to discharge water meetingmeet or exceed standards for drinking water standardsand for agriculture and livestock as set out by the Peruvian Ministry of Health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the State of Nevada Regulations and World Bank guidelines. See "-Regulation, Permitting and Environmental Matters".

Electric power for Yanacocha's operations is currently provided by a local power company. Yanacocha can also relyrelies on its own twenty diesel generators which have an aggregate power generation capacity of 16,000 kilowatts, ("kw").or kw. In addition, Yanacocha has been connected to the Peruvian national electricity grid since the end of 1997. Yanacocha currently receives its supply of electric power through a 220 kilovolt, ("kV")or kV, power line originating in Trujillo, which is owned by Buenaventura and has the capacity to provide up to 150 megawatts, ("MW")or MW, to Yanacocha (although current contracted demand is limited to 42MW). In addition, a 60 kV power line routed through Cajamarca permits Yanacocha to receive up to 15 MW. This power line is used only in emergencies. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects".

Water for Yanacocha's operations is collected from rainfall and wells. All excess water used by Yanacocha undergoes water treatment at the water treatment plantfacilities described above. Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the years shown for each of Yanacocha's mining operations that were then in operation:

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mining Operations:

Ore mined (dry short tons):

Cerro Yanacocha

27,395,912 

53,831,585

97,660,028

78,201,929

73,551,712

53,831,585

97,660,028

78,201,929

73,551,712

64,582,674

Carachugo

34,912,518

23,321,305

5,301,915

101,150

-

23,321,305

5,301,915

101,150

-

Maqui Maqui

3,754,305

-

-

-

-

La Quinua

-

4,066,142

45,779,942

68,555,909

63,714,676

4,066,142

45,779,942

68,555,909

63,714,676

80,889,028

San José

16,961,576

3,519,248

114,089

-

-

3,519,248

114,089

-

-

Total ore mined (dry short tons)

83,024,311

84,738,280

148,855,974

146,858,989

137,266,389

84,738,280

148,855,974

146,858,989

137,266,389

145,471,702

Average gold grade of ore mined

(oz./dry short ton)

Cerro Yanacocha

0.032

0.029

0.021

0.024

0.022

0.029

0.021

0.024

0.022

0.034

Carachugo

0.032

0.033

0.019

0.014

-

0.033

0.019

0.014

-

Maqui Maqui

0.033

-

-

-

-

San José

0.030

0.037

0.024

-

-

0.037

0.024

-

La Quinua

-

0.018

0.028

0.031

0.029

0.018

0.028

0.031

0.029

0.023

Total average gold grade of ore
Mined (oz./dry short ton)

0.031

0.030

0.023

0.027

0.025

0.030

0.023

0.027

0.025

0.028

Gold Production (oz.):

Cerro Yanacocha

610,183

954,406

903,581

813,132

740,087

954,406

903,581

813,132

740,087

1,198,160

Carachugo

788,111

904,192

585,249

826,920

701,491

904,192

585,249

826,920

701,491

421,967

Maqui Maqui

43,025

37,974

30,998

64,335

45,612

37,974

30,998

64,335

45,612

38,631

San José

354,079

-

-

-

-

La Quinua

-

5,917

765,756

1,146,756

1,530,112

5,917

765,756

1,146,756

1,530,112

1,674,329

Total gold (oz.)

1,795,398

1,902,489

2,285,584

2,851,143

1,902,489

2,285,584

2,851,143

3,333,088

Exploration

Yanacocha's exploration activities encompass 176,408262,792 hectares of land. Chaupiloma holds the mining rights with respect to these hectares and has assigned the mining rights relating to 108,089110,560 hectares to Yanacocha, covered by 183182 mining concessions and fourseven provisional permits. Although Chaupiloma has not assigned to Yanacocha the mining rights to the remaining hectares, Chaupiloma permits Yanacocha to explore these hectares. See "-Mining and Processing Concessions".Concessions."

Exploration expenditures amounted to approximately US$11.112.8 million, US$12.835.2 million and US$35.232.9 million in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively. These expenditures have resulted in the identification of several deposits, which have been advanced to reserves and non-reserve mineralized material, including Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha, La Quinua (which includes Cerro Negro), Cerro Quilish, Chaquicocha, El Tapado, Corimayo, Antonio, Quecher and Quecher.Minas Conga. Exploration and development continue at Corimayo and Antonio to define the limits of these oxide mineralization systems and to determine the extent of high-grade mineralization in these bodies. Oxide mineralization hasexpenditures have also been identified on the surface and in drill holes at Antonio where development and exploration activities will advance this new discovery. Lastly, exploration funds have been used to identify deep sulfide mineralization beneath the oxide deposits at El Tapado, Corimayo, Antonio, Yanacocha and Chaquicocha. In 2005, expl oration2006, exploration efforts will focus on Chaquicochametallurgical and infill drilling at Chaquicocha. A pilot plant-scale metallurgical test is planned for 2006-2007 to ensure that this sulfide deposit is characterized asdetermine any NRM byallocations. A first pass drilling test and follow up has been scheduled at several target sites, namely, San Cirilo, Mishacocha, Gentiles SE, and the endwestern portion of 2005.the Yanacocha District (Exaltado target).

Yanacocha's exploration and development expenditures include all of the costs associated with exploration activities such as drilling, geologistsgeological and metallurgical testing. Yanacocha prepares a budget for each year and allocates an amount for exploration and development activities. In light of the nature of mining exploration and in order to maintain flexibility to take advantage of opportunities that may arise, Yanacocha does not allocate thea specified budgeted amount by property or project. Rather, Yanacocha allocates thea budgeted amount over the course of the year to each project based on Yanacocha's needs and its geologists' periodic evaluations of the progress of each project and its potential for development.mine construction.

Yanacocha intends to continue to develop the Cerro Yanacocha, La Quinua and Chaquicocha gold deposit projects and the Minas Conga gold-copper deposit project over the next several years, while continuing to explore the remainder of the Yanacocha district along with the adjacent Minas Conga and Solitario mineral holdings. For 2005,2006, Yanacocha's estimated expenditures are US$24.819.2 million for exploration, and development which will be expensed, and an additional US$3.44.9 million for developmentdelineation activities for ore bodies that are currently classified as reserves that will be capitalized. This budgeted amount will be expended mainly on the Corimayo,Chaquicocha, Cerro Yanacocha, La Quinua, (which includes Cerro Negro), Antonio and Minas Conga deposits along with an extensive oxide exploration program in Yanacocha's properties.

In 2000, one drill hole at Corimayo was the most successful in Yanacocha's history, resulting in 1,400 feet of 0.1 ounce of gold per ton with one segment of 143 feet at 0.43 ounce per ton material. Significant sulfide materialization, both copper and gold, also was discovered at Cerro Yanacocha and Chaquicocha. Activities in 2001 and 2002, activities resulted in the identification of a continuous, high-grade zone at Corimayo, which can be traced for at least 600 meters in a north-south direction and contains a significant volume of oxide material with grades of 5 to 20 grams per metric ton common through this zone. At the end of 2003, Corimayo contained 3.0 million ounces of reserve and 0.5 million ounces of non-reserve (oxide) material, and Antonio and Quecher contained 0.11 million and 0.04 million ounces respectively, of reserve.reserves, respectively. In 2004, exploration efforts focused on the exploration and development of near-surface oxide deposits at Cerro Quilish, including Cerro Negro, and Chaquicocha, and the expansion of the Antonio deposit and the GuilianaGiuliana prospect, located north of the Yanacocha Norte pit. Exploration and development of gold-dominant sulfide mineralization continues beneath known oxide deposits at Yanacocha Sur, Chaquicocha, Tapado, Corimayo, Antonio and Maqui Maqui. In 2004, developmentinfill drilling at Minas Conga added 8.7 million ouncesounc es of gold and 2.23 billion pounds of copper from the ChailhuagonPerol and PerolChailhuagon deposits. In 2005, Yanacocha will focus on converting high-value inferred mineralization toadditional infill drilling at the ChailhuagonChaihuagon and Perol deposits to reservesadded 3.1 million ounces, and converting0.99 billion pounds of copper reserves. At the Amaro deposit, to0.96 million ounces of gold were designated as NRM. Several early stage target sites were tested by drilling, including Gentiles at the Minas Conga deposit and San Cirilo at the Solitario deposit. At the Yanacocha District, a shallow oxide deposit, Marleny, has been discovered between Yanacocha Sur and the Carachugo deposit. Metallurgical tests are in progress at Marleny.

Transportation and Refining

The doré bars produced at Yanacocha's operations in Peruby Yanacocha are transported to refineries outside of Peru (currently, the United States). The refining and, off-shore portion of theaccordingly, Yanacocha has entered into pre-established transportation is conducted via an arrangement with Bank of Nova Scotia. The off-shorecontracts. Yanacocha has engaged Hermes Transportes Blindados S.A., or Hermes, to service its local transportation isrequirements and has subcontracted its offshore transportation to an outside security firm, Securicor International Services USA Inc. ("Securicor"). Yanacocha has an arrangement with a local security firm, Hermes Transportes Blindados S.A. ("Hermes") for domestic transportation., or Securicor. Under the terms of this arrangement,Yanacocha's agreement with Hermes, the risk of loss with respect to the doré bars producedis assumed in its entirety by Yanacocha transfers from Yanacocha to Hermes whenduring the doorstransportation of the security transport vehicle at Yanacocha's mine site are closed and the doré bars have been signed for by a representative of Hermes' transporting company. Hermes is responsible for transporting, storing, guarding and delivering the doré bars from Yanacocha's mine sitethe mines to and untilJorge Chávez Airport in Lima. Thereafter, the Lima airport loading o fresponsibility for the doré bars onto an international carrier.

shifts to Securicor is responsible for transporting, storing, guarding and deliveringuntil the bars are delivered to the designated refineries. The doré bars from loading of the doré bars at the Lima airport to a strong-room vault at the Johnson Matthey refinery in Salt Lake City, the United States. Liability for any damage to or loss of doré shipments while under Securicor's custody at the mine site or in transport to the delivery point is assumed by Securicor, up to a maximum of US$100 million per shipment. Accordingly, Yanacocha limits its shipments to US$100 million in value, with the average shipment being US$20 million in value.

Upon delivery by Securicor to the refiner, Johnson Matthey, the refiner assumes all risk of loss and damage to the doré bars. Prior to assaying, the doré bars are transported to the refinery where they are melted, weighed and sampled in refineries abroad, which store the presence ofdoré bars in strong-room vaults and assume responsibility there for the dor&e acute; bars. Yanacocha pays a representative of Alfred Knight Ltd., a professional assayer retained by Yanacocha. Each ofpredetermined fee for the refiner and Alfred Knight, on behalf of Yanacocha, takes samples from the melted doré to assay. Alfred Knight independently assays Yanacocha's sample at its laboratory.refining service. The refiner and Alfred Knight then exchange assay results and use the arithmetic mean of the results for a settlement assay. If the results of Alfred Knight's and the refiner's assays differ by more than a certain amount, then a mutually agreed upon third party assayer will determine the final result assay.

The output from refineries suchis known as Johnson Matthey is London Good Delivery gold and silver. Yanacocha is charged a predetermined fee for the refinement. Yanacocha enters into two-year refining arrangements because management believes that in the current increasingly competitive marketplace, it will be able to negotiate better pricing in each future year. Further, if marketplace fundamentals shift, Yanacocha is confident that it can readily secure longer-term refining arrangements.

Sales of Gold

Yanacocha's gold sales are made through a monthly open-bidding process in which Yanacocha auctions its production, corresponding to the next four to sixfive weeks. This bidding process is set up by Yanacocha before each month with approximately 10 financial institutions and trading firms.firms prior to each month. Yanacocha collects bids and confirms sales. The gold is typically deemed sold on the date of departure from Jorge ChavezChávez Airport in Lima and revenue is recognized when the price is determinable, the product has been delivered and transfer of title to the customer and collection of the sales price is reasonably assured.Lima. If a portion of gold remains unsold, it is sold four or five days later. Silver is sold on the spot market approximately once a month to creditworthy traders. CashThe cash from such sales is received into a collection account in London and, prior to July 2004, transferred to the Bank of New York against orders to the refinersrefineries for deliveries of the gold and silver to the purchasers in connection wit h a May 1997 US$100 million asset securitization financing transaction backed by Yanacocha's sales receivables (the "Yanacocha Receivables Securitization").purchasers.

Delivery is made once a week and payments are collected the day of confirmation. The payment price for the gold consists of either (i) the market price at the confirmation of the sale, andor (ii) the average London PM Fixing price over the tendered period plus a small premium established pursuant to the bidding process.

Since 1994, Yanacocha has consistently sold to five or six financial institutions and trading firms at each auction. Such buyers are market makers and active participants in precious metal markets.

Employees

At December 31, 2004,2005, Yanacocha had 2,3132,935 employees. Compensation received by Yanacocha's employees includes base salary and other non-cash benefits such as a health program and term life insurance. In addition, pursuant to the profit sharing plan mandated by Peruvian labor legislation, employees at Yanacocha are entitled to receive eight percent of the annual pre-tax profits of their employers, (the "Employeeor the Employee Profit Sharing Amount"),Amount, four percent of such profits to be distributed based on the number of days each employee worked during the preceding year and the remaining four percent of such profits to be distributed among the employees based on their relative salary levels. Effective January 1, 1997, the annual payment to each employee under the profit sharing plan cannot exceed 18 times such employee's monthly salary, and any difference between the Employee Profit Sharing Amount and the aggregate amount paid to employees must be contributed by Yanacocha to theFondo Nacional d e Capacitación Laboral dey Promoción del Empleo (FONDO EMPLEO), a public fund to be established to promote employment and employee training.

Under Peruvian law, Yanacocha may dismiss workers for cause by following certain formal procedures. Yanacocha may dismiss a worker without cause, provided that Yanacocha pays such worker a layoff indemnification in an amount equal to one and a half month's salary for each full year worked plus the pro rata portion for any uncompleted year, not to exceed, in the aggregate, 12 months' salary. Several decisions adopted by the Peruvian Constitutional Court, holding that an employee is entitled for reinstatement if no cause for dismissal is expressed by the employer or for failure to present evidence supporting the employer's grounds, have limited Yanacocha's ability to dismiss a worker without cause. Although Yanacocha has informed that Company that it cannot determine how judicial interpretation will develop, Yanacocha is of the view that the Constitutional Proceedings Code, enacted May 31, 2004, may eliminate employee reinstatement. However, all employees are entitled to a severance payment upon termination of their employment, regardless of the reason for such termination, equal to one month's salary for each full year worked plus the pro rata portion for any uncompleted year. Pursuant to the Peruvian labor laws enacted in 1991, Yanacocha deposits funds for severance payments in a bank account selected by each employee and for the benefit of such employee, in both May and November of each year.

Yanacocha's employees receive the benefit of one of twothree types of pension arrangements. All workers can choose to enroll in the system of theOficina de Normalización Previsional (the Public Pension System, or "ONP") orONP), in a privately-managed system of individual contribution pension funds ("AFPs").or in theAdministradoras de Fondo de Pensiones, or AFPs. Yanacocha is required to withhold 13 percent from the salary of each employee enrolled in the ONP system and pay such amount to the ONP system, and withhold between 11.5 percent and 12 percent from the salary of each employee enrolled in the AFP system and pay such amount to the respective AFP. Yanacocha has no liability for the performance of these pension plans. As of January 2006, these percentages increased to between 13.5percent and 14percent due to a two percent increase in the individual contribution pension fund regulated by law.

In addition, Yanacocha pays to ES SALUD (the new social security agency) nine percent of its total payroll for general health services for all employees. Law No. 26790 also requires Yanacocha to provide private insurance representing an average payment equal to 1.551.48 percent of the payroll of covered employees for employment-related incapacity and death for blue collar employees and other employees exposed to mining-related hazards. As of December 1, 2004, Yanacocha is no longer required to pay a total of 1.7 percent of its total payroll for the Extraordinary Solidarity Tax.

Yanacocha has entered into arrangements with independent contractors who are responsible for the security services and staffing for several operational and administrative areas. During 2004,At December 31, 2005, independent contractors employed an average of 6,5657,475 persons who worked at Yanacocha's operations. In 2004, Yanacocha has experienced no strikes and in 2004 entered into its first collective bargaining agreement with Workers' Union of Minera Yanacocha SRL, (the "Union"),or the Union, which was created and registered before the Peruvian Labor Ministry on December 9, 2003. Because the Union had 578667 members as of December 31, 2004,2005, a minority of Yanacocha's employees, the collective bargaining agreement only applies to the Union's members.members and expires on February 28, 2007. Although the collective bargaining agreement has not yet expired, a small percentage of Union members engaged in a three-day strike in April 2006. The strike did not have any material impact on Yanacocha's operations; nevertheless there can be no assurance that Yanacocha will not experience oth er strikes or labor-related work stoppages that could have a material adverse effect on its operations or its operating results.

Since commencement of operations, Yanacocha's rate of turnover has been less than ten percent per year. Yanacocha has informed the Companyus that it considers its relations with its employees to be good.

Social Development

Since its formation,Yanacocha has been attentive to its relationship with the community in the fields of social relations and development.

During 2004,2005, the External Affairs Management, an internal department within Yanacocha, through its Community Relations and Rural Development Management Offices and its Community Development Management Office,Departments, established social development programs that address 74110 rural communities and the city of Cajamarca. To implement these programs, and their projects, Yanacocha developed active relationships with domestic and foreign institutions and organizations, including the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Agriculture,Tourism, Cajamarca local governments, International Finance Corporation, CITE Koriwasi, Cooperative Housing Foundation, or CHF, Asociacion para el Desarrollo Rural de Cajamarca, or ASPADERUC, Asociacion para el Desarrollo Forestal, or ADEFOR, Camara Regional de Turismo, or CARETUR, FONDO EMPLEO, Nestlé Perú, Antares, Adaminya, Asodel,Asociacion para el Desarrollo Local, or ASODEL, Foncreagro, Cenfotur Aprec, Asociación Yanacocha and Pronaturaleza,Aprec, among others. In 2004,2005, Yanacocha invested up to US$7.116.7 million in its social development programs.

In addition, in accordance with the agreements executed with municipality and regional government authorities in 2003,2005, Yanacocha invested approximatelyUS$5.9 million in educational infrastructure at the Davey school and US$2.6 million for road improvements. In addition, Yanacocha invested US$7.4 million in 2004development programs for the construction of roads, the extension of a regional hospital, supporting projects for local assistance for municipalityrural areas, and regional governmentmade donations to Asociación Los Andes de Cajamarca to support small enterprises dedicated to handcraft, agriculture, industry, and enhancing educational infrastrucutre in Cajamarca. Moreover, in 2004 Yanacocha signed an agreement with municipality and regional government authorities to provide US$4.3 million for projects to be completed in 2005.tourism activities.

Since 1993, Yanacocha has invested nearly US$4255 million (including the total investment made by Yanacocha in social development programs) in educational,programs including education, health, social infrastructure (schools and medical posts) and, productive infrastructure projects, (ruralrural electrification, roads, transformation plants, business promotion programs, local tourist programs, livestock and agricultural assistance programs).

During 2004, Yanacocha allocated US$1.9 million to "Asociacion Los Andes de Cajamarca", previously called "Fondo Cajamarca Sostenible", a civil association, for responsible and sustainable development programs in 2004, focusing on livestock, tourism, handicrafts, agricultural business and construction.programs.

Security

Yanacocha has 5255 security employees on its payroll and employs one expatriate and a security force of over 31126 persons with respect to its mining operations, including 52six persons with respect to the processing plant, 12 personsone person with respect to its headquarters in Lima and 7 personsone person with respect to the road to the coast.No terrorist incidents have been recorded against Yanacocha's personnel or property at its mining operations or at its headquarters in Lima.

Mining and Processing Concessions

The majorityYanacocha's exploration activities encompass 262,792 hectares covered by 409 mining concessions. Chaupiloma holds the mining rights with respect to these hectares and has assigned the mining rights relating to 110,560 hectares to Yanacocha, which are covered by 182 mining concessions. Chaupiloma has assigned these mining concessions to Yanacocha pursuant to several assignments of mining rights, each with an initial term of 20 years and expiring in 2012, 2014, 2015, 2018, 2021, 2024, 2025 and 2035, that are renewable at Yanacocha's request for an additional 20-year term. Chaupiloma has not yet assigned 505 hectares covered by seven mining concessions to Yanacocha, although Chaupiloma permits Yanacocha to explore these hectares. Approximately 22 percent of the mining concessions that have been assigned by Chaupiloma to Yanacocha were claimed prior to 1991. Chaupiloma is owned 40 percent by Newmont Peru and 60 percent by the Companyus directly and through itsour affiliate Cedimin.

Yanacocha's exploration activities encompass 176,408 hectares of land. Chaupiloma holds the mining rights with respect to these hectares and has assigned the mining rights relating to 108,089 hectares to Yanacocha, which are covered by 183 mining concessions and provisional permits. Although Chaupiloma has not assigned the mining rights to the remaining hectares to Yanacocha, Chaupiloma permits Yanacocha to explore these hectares. Currently, 17of18of the mining concessions assigned to Yanacocha are being utilized for mining operations. They are Chaupiloma Uno, Chaupiloma Dos, Chaupiloma Tres, Chaupiloma Cuatro, Chaupiloma Cinco, Chaupiloma Seis, Chaupiloma Once, Chaupiloma Doce, Chaupiloma Trece, Chaupiloma Catorce, Chaupiloma Veintiuno, Chaupiloma Veintiuno A2, Chaupiloma Cuarentaidos, Chaupiloma Cincuentaicuatro, El Sol No. 4, La Providencia, Mirtha III and Mirtha III.TheClaudina Ocho.

The Carachugo and the San José mining operationsfacilities are located on the mining concessions of Chaupiloma Tres, Chaupil omaChaupiloma Cuatro and Chaupiloma Cinco; the Maqui Maqui mining operationfacility is located on the mining concessions of Chaupiloma Seis and Chaupiloma Doce; the Cerro Yanacocha minigmining operation is located on the Chaupiloma Uno, Chaupiloma Dos and Chaupiloma Tres mining concessions andconcessions; the La Quinua mining operationfacility is located on the Chaupiloma Dos, Chaupiloma Once, Chaupiloma Catorce, Chaupiloma Veintiuno, Chaupiloma Cuarentidos, Chaupiloma Cincuenticuatro, Mirtha III, La Providencia, Chaupiloma Trece, Chaupiloma Veintiuno A2 and El Sol No. 4 mining concessions.concessions; the Cerro Negro mining facility is located on the Chaupiloma has assigned 183Catorce mining concessions toand the Calera China Linda mining operation is located on the Claudina Ocho mining concession. Yanacocha pursuant to several assignments ofcurrently conducts mining rights, both with an initial term of 20 years expiring in 2012, 2021activities at Cerro Yanacocha, La Quinua and 2023, renewable upon Yanacocha's request for an additional 20-year term. Calera China Linda.

Yanacocha pays a royalty fee to Chaupiloma for the right to mine five of the mining concessions of 3 percent of the net sale value of all ore extracted from these mining concessions after deducting refinery and transport cost s.costs for the right to mine five of the mining concessions. For 2004,2005, Yanacocha paid royalties of US$37.945.6 million to Chaupiloma. The otherseven mining concessions and provisional permits have beennot yet assigned to Yanacocha will be assigned to Yanacocha by Chaupiloma on comparable terms.

According to Peruvian mining law, the assignee in an assignment of mining concessions assumes all the duties and rights of the holder of the concession. Management of Yanacocha believes that the mining concessions assigned to Yanacocha are in full force and effect under applicable Peruvian laws and that Yanacocha is in compliance with all material terms and requirements applicable to the mining concessions and is not experiencing any condition, occurrence or event known to it that would cause the revocation, cancellation, lapsing,lapse, expiration or termination thereof, except that Yanacocha and Chaupiloma may, from time to time, remake, cancel, terminate or allow to lapse mining concessions assigned to Yanacocha that are not material to the conduct of Yanacocha's business.

Yanacocha has been actively pursuing the acquisition of the land surface rights or obtaining easements relating to land positions containing prospective geological exploration targets,target sites, deposits that can be developed in the future or areas that would be considered for plant or facility sites. To date, Yanacocha has acquired all the surface rights with respect to 13,40013,401 hectares of the surface land covering its Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua (which includes the Cerro Negro deposit) mining operations, and a majority of the Cerro Quilish deposit. In addition, at December 31, 2005, Yanacocha hashad acquired 4,28321,331 hectares, including 4,618 hectares of surface rights with respect to the Minas Conga.SeeConga deposit, 2,975 hectares for the San Cirilo and Lagunas prospects at Solitario, and 337 hectares for future land swaps.See "-The Company-History and Development".

In addition, Yanacocha is subject to the Urban Mining Concessions Law which was released on
December 19, 1998. See "-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Mining and Processing Concessions".

Yanacocha has twothree processing concessions from MEM for its processing plant. The processing concession has an indefinite term, subject to the payment of a fee based on nominal capacity for the processing plant. Yanacocha paid approximately US$0.13 million138,670 in fees for the twothree processing concessions for the year ended December 31, 20042005 and is current in the payment of all amounts due in respect of its two processing concessions.

Although payment of a royalty is required by the Peruvian government,law, Yanacocha is currently exempt from such requirement due to stability contracts entered into with the Peruvian government to maintain in full force and effect its rights to the properties it is mining or exploring.

Regulation, Permit and Environmental Matters

Yanacocha is subject to thea full range of governmental regulation and supervision generally applicable to companies engaged in business in Peru, including mining laws, labor laws, social security laws, public health, consumer protection laws, environmental laws, securities laws and antitrust laws. See "-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Mining and Processing Concessions" and "-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Environmental Matters" for a general description of Peruvian regulations of mining companies and environmental obligations. See "-Mining and Processing Concessions" above for a discussion of Peruvian regulations relating to the mining and processing concessions utilized by Yanacocha in its mining operations.

Yanacocha is required to submit certain documentation with respect to Yanacocha'sits plans and operations for the review and approval of various Peruvian government entities, including the MEM, the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Health. Yanacocha is required to file and obtain approval of an EIS for each of its mining operations before being authorized to operate such mine. EISs for the Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha, and La Quinua (including Cerro Negro) mining operations and China Linda lime plant have been approved. Pursuant to current Peruvian regulations, Yanacocha also submits supplemental EISs each time a project's production rate or disturbed area used is expanded by more than 50 percent. In 2004, Yanacocha filed an EIS to expand its operations at Carachugo. After an EIS is approved and the mine is placed in operation,construction activities are initiated, a governmental-accredited environmental auditing firm is required to audit the operation twothree times per year. Each of the Carachugo, MaquiM aqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha, an d La Quinua (including Cerro Negro) mining operations and China Linda lime plant has been and continues to be audited as required andwith no materialsignificant pollution problems have been identified.

Yanacocha's corporate policy is tooperate in compliance with all material applicable laws and regulations and adopt and adhere to standards that are protective of both human health and the environment at the facilities it builds and operates.Additionally, Yanacocha has agreed to several environmental covenants in loans with the IFC that require Yanacocha to comply with relevant World Bank environmental guidelines and World Bank occupational health and safety guidelines, and such covenants are monitored annually by IFC. See "-Trust Certificates and IFC Loan Documents". In addition, in 2005 Yanacocha became a signatory of the International Cyanide Code, which provides specific and strict standards on how to manage cyanide.

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, ("FASB")or FASB, issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," effective January 1, 2003, which established a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. Accordingly, on January 1, 2003, Yanacocha recorded the estimated present value of reclamation liabilities, ("or asset retirement obligation"obligation or "ARO")ARO, and increased the carrying amount of the related asset to be retired in the future.Yanacocha allocates the carrying amount of the related asset to expense over the life of the related assets, adjusting for changes resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate. At January 1, 2003, Yanacocha recorded approximately US$50 million for the carrying amount of the related asset, net, an increase of approximately US$72.1 million to ARO, an increase of US$7.9 million to deferred tax liabilities, and an increase of US$2.3 million to deferred profit sharing liabilities.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 143, estimated future reclamation costs were based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Such costs for active mines were accrued and charged over the expected operating lives of the mines using the unit of production method based on proven and probable reserves. Future remediation costs for inactive mines were accrued based on management's best estimate at the end of each period of the undiscounted costs expected to be incurred at a site. Such cost estimates included, where applicable, ongoing care, maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates were reflected in earnings in the period an estimate was revised.

Yanacocha has informed the Companyus that Yanacocha'sits management believes that its operations are conducted in accordance with all material applicable laws and regulations. All future exploration and developmentconstruction projects require or will require a variety of permits. Although procedures for permit applications and approvals are customarily faster in Peru than in the United States, permitting procedures are still complex, time-consuming and subject to potential regulatory delay.

Yanacocha has informed the Companyus that Yanacocha'sits management does not believe that existing permitting requirements or other environmental protection laws and regulations applicable to Yanacocha will have a materialan adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. However, Yanacocha's management recognizes the possibility that additional, more stringent environmental laws and regulations may be enacted in Peru, which could result in significant additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions or delays associated with the developmentconstruction and operation of Yanacocha's properties. Neither the Companywe nor Yanacocha can predict whether Yanacocha will be able to renew its existing permits or whether materialsignificant changes in existing permit conditions will be imposed. Non-renewal of existing permits or the imposition of additional conditions with respect to Yanacocha could have a materialsignificant adverse effect on Yanacocha'sits financial condition or results of operations.

Yanacocha has informed the Companyus that Yanacocha'sits management believes that it is in compliance with all materialapplicable regulations and international standards concerning safety.

Insurance

Yanacocha maintains a comprehensive insurance program designed to address the specific risks associated with its operations, in addition to covering the normal insured risks encountered by major mining companies.

Yanacocha's insurance program consists of a "Primary Program" and an "Umbrella/Excess Program".Program." Coverage under the Primary Program is provided through the local Peruvian insurance market and includes employers' liability, comprehensive third party general liability, comprehensive automobile liability, all risk property on a replacement basis, including transit risks, business interruption insurance and mining equipment. Coverage under the Umbrella/Excess Program is provided through Newmont Mining's master worldwide insurance program and addresses claims that the Primary Program cannot, or will not, cover. During 20042005 and 2003,2004, Yanacocha received US$1.01.1 million and US$1.31.0 million, respectively, from its insurance program in connection with thea mercury spill and expects to receive further insurance payments to cover most of the remediation expenses Yanacochait incurred as a result of the accident.

Trust Certificates and IFC Loan Documents

In 1997, Yanacocha issued debt through the sale of US$100 million Series A Trust Certificates to various institutional investors. The proceeds from the Yanacocha Receivables Securitization were primarily used to finance the Cerro Yanacocha project. In June 2004, the Trust Certificates were paid in full.

In order to finance the La Quinua project, Yanacocha obtained a credit facility from IFC. Pursuant to an agreement dated December 22, 1999, IFC agreed to extend to Yanacocha a loan in the amount of up to US$20 million (Tranche A) to be repaid no later than December 15, 2009, and a second loan in the amount of up to US$80 million (Tranche B) to be repaid no later than December 15, 2006. As ofOn December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, US$30 million, US$40 million and US$50 million, respectively, was outstanding under15, 2005, this credit facility. This credit facility is available on a revolving basis and contains financial covenants similar to the previous IFC loans. These covenants consist of affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited to the restriction on paying dividends if after giving effect to such payment (a) the current liquidity ratio is less than 1.2:1, (b) the debt to equity ratio is no greater than 70:30, (c) the trailing four quarters debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.3:1, or (d) the reserve coverage ratio is less than 2.0:1. During the revolving period, an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.375 percent for Tranche A and LIBOR plus 2.5 percent for Tranche B, will bewas paid quarterly.in full.

In June 2004,Yanacocha amended its US$40 million line of credit with Banco de Crédito del Perú to extend the term of the credit facility to June 2007, reduce the applicable interest rate and increase the facility to US$50 million. The amended credit facility hashad an interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.65 percent through June 2005 and LIBOR plus 2 percent thereafter. The interest rate under the previous agreement was LIBOR plus 0.75 percent through June 2004. During 2004, Yanacocha borrowed and repaid US$65.5 million in the aggregate. There was no amount outstanding under this line of credit at December 31, 2004.

In June 2004, Yanacocha entered into a US$20 million credit facility with BBV Banco Continental, which expires in June 2005. The credit facility has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.7 percent. There was no amount outstanding as of December 31, 2004.

All Yanacocha debt is secured by substantially all of Yanacocha's property, plant and equipment. Yanacocha's financing agreements contain certain covenants that limit indebtedness and distribution of earnings. In addition, Yanacocha must maintain certain financial ratios as provided in the financing agreements. At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, Yanacocha was in compliance with these covenants.

By-Laws of Yanacocha

Yanacocha is governed by the Peruvian Companies Law and theestatutos (the combined articles of incorporation and by-laws) of Yanacocha, (the "Yanacocha By-Laws").or the Yanacocha By-Laws.

Control Over Major Corporate Events

Pursuant to the Peruvian Companies Law and the Yanacocha By-Laws (including applicable quorum requirements), without the affirmative vote of the partners of Yanacocha representing at least 51 percent of the voting shares, none of the following may occur: (i) an increase or decrease in Yanacocha's capital, (ii) the issuance of any debentures, (iii) any sale of an asset whose book value is at least 50 percent of the paid in capital relating to such asset, (iv) any amendment to the Yanacocha By-Laws in order to change its business form, (v) the merger, consolidation, dissolution or liquidation of Yanacocha or (vi) any other amendment of the Yanacocha By-Laws.

Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement among Newmont Second, Condesa,Compagnie Miniére Internationale Or S.A. and IFC, dated as of August 16, 1993, as amended by a General Amendment Letter, dated August 17, 1994, any member of the Executive Committee of Yanacocha who wishes to propose that Yanacocha's Executive Committee authorize Yanacocha to take a Significant Action (as defined below) must (i) give written notice to each partner of such proposal prior to consideration thereof at a meeting of the Executive Committee and (ii) refrain from voting to approve such Significant Action until (x) the Executive Committee has received the consent of 80 percent of the partners of Yanacocha (a partner is deemed to have consented if no objection is received from such partner within 30 days after being notified) or (y) the Executive Committee has received the consent of at least 51 percent of the partners of Yanacocha and 45 days have elapsed since the member of the Executive Commi ttee who proposed the Significant Action has responded in writing to objections received from objecting partners. "Significant Action" means (i) a disposal or sale of more than 20 percent by value of Yanacocha's fixed assets, (ii) any planned shutdown or cessation of Yanacocha's mining activities that is planned to last for more than one year, (iii) any capital expenditure by Yanacocha exceeding US$20 million, (iv) any disposal or sale by Yanacocha of the mining rights covered by certain concessions or (v) the approval of the developmentconstruction of a project in the area owned by Yanacocha (other than the Carachugo mine and processing facilities).

Preemptive Rights

The Peruvian Companies Law and the Yanacocha By-Laws provide preemptive rights to all partners of Yanacocha. In the event of a capital increase, any partner has a preemptive right to pay its pro rata share of such increase in order to maintain such partner's existing participation in Yanacocha.

In the event of a proposed transfer, exchange or sale, either voluntary or involuntary, of participation, (collectively,collectively referred to as the "Offered Participation")Offered Participation, of one or more partners, any partner has a right to acquire the Offered Participation in proportion to its holdings of partners' capital. In the event that not all of the partners wish to exercise this right or some indicate their decision to acquire a smaller share than that to which they are entitled, the other partners will be entitled to an increase, and consequently, the remaining participation will be distributed among them in proportion to such partners' capital participation and within the maximum limit of the participation they have stated their intention to acquire. Finally, any Offered Participation remaining unsubscribed by the partners must first be offered to Yanacocha before they may be offered to third parties.

Legal Proceedings

Choropampa.InChoropampa. In June 2000, a transport contractor of Yanacocha spilled approximately 151 kilograms of elemental mercury near the town of Choropampa, Peru, which is located 53 miles southwest of the Yanacocha mine. Elemental mercury is a by-product of gold mining and was sold to a Lima firm for use in medical instrumentationinstruments and industrial applications. A comprehensive health and environmental remediation program was undertaken by Yanacocha.Yanacocha in response to the incident. In August 2000, Yanacocha paid under protest a fine of 1,740,000 Nuevos Soles (approximately $0.5US$0.5 million) to the Peruvian government. Yanacocha entered into settlement agreements with a number of individuals impacted by the incident. In addition, itYanacocha has entered into agreements with the three of the communities impacted by this incident to provide a variety of public works as compensation for the disruption and inconvenience caused by the incident.

On September 10, 2001, Yanacocha, various wholly-owned subsidiaries of Newmont and other defendants werehave been named in a lawsuitlawsuits filed by over 9001,000 Peruvian citizens in the Denver District Court forof the State of Colorado in connection with the elemental mercury spill. This action seeks compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the elemental mercury spill incident. This action was dismissed by the Denver District Court on May 22, 2002 and this ruling was reaffirmed by the Court on July 30, 2002. Plaintiffs' attorneys appealed this dismissal and in November 2003, the Colorado Court of Appeals remanded the matter for further review to the Denver District Court. In January 2004, NewmontFebruary 2005, Yanacocha and the other named defendants filed a writ of Cetiorari requesting the Colorado Supreme Court to review the matter. In February 2005, Yanacocha filed an answer in the Denver District Court forof the State of Colorado.

In July 2002, other lawsuits were instituted against Yanacocha and various other defendants in the Denver District Court for the State of Colorado and in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, by approximately 140 additional Peruvian plaintiffs and by the same plaintiffs who filed the September 2001 lawsuit. These actions also seek compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the mercury spill incident. These lawsuits remain stayed pending further judicial action. In February 2005, Yanacocha filed a response to the complaint.

Additional lawsuits relating to the Choropampa mercury spill incident were filed against Yanacocha in thetwo local courts of Cajamarca, Peru, in May 2002 by over 900 Peruvian citizens. A significant number of the plaintiffs in these lawsuits have previously have entered into settlement agreements with Yanacocha. In December 2003, the Superior Court in Cajamarca granted a resolution upholding the validity of certain challenged settlement agreements. This ruling has been appealed to the Peruvian Supreme Court.Court, where it remains stayed pending further judicial action. In 2005, Yanacocha entered into settlement agreements with approximately 350 additional plaintiffs.

Neither the Companywe nor Yanacocha can reasonably predict the final outcome of any of the above-described lawsuits.

As of December 31, 2004, Yanacocha has expensed approximately US$7.0 million for public works, remediation efforts, personal and community compensation and the fine, net of insurance refunds.Yanacocha cannot predict the likelihood of any additional expenditure related to this matter.

Cerro Quilish. TheIn 2000, the Provincial Municipality of Cajamarca enacted an ordinance declaring the Cerro Quilish deposit and its watershed to be a reserved and protected natural area. Cerro Quilish is an ore deposit which contains reserves of 3.854 million ounces and is located in the same watershed as the city of Cajamarca. Yanacocha challenged this ordinance on the grounds that, under Peruvian law, local governments lack authority to create such areas. The case was heard in early 2003, and on April 30,In 2003, the Constitutional Tribunal held that because Yanacocha had acquired the mining concessions in the Cerro Quilish area many years prior to the adoption of the contested ordinance, its rights were not impacted by the ordinance. On May 8, 2003, the Constitutional Tribunal reaffirmed its ruling in this matter.

However, the Tribunal has required Yanacocha to complete and Yanacocha is committed to completing a full environmental impact study, conducted by independent and certified organizations or institutions, prior to initiating any development at Cerro Quilish, and will adopt mitigation measures necessary to protect the quality and quantity of the water supply of the City of Cajamarca. While the central government has the primary responsibility and the necessary technical expertise to regulate this matter, Yanacocha is also committed to working with the local government and other affected stakeholders in completing the required studies and designing and implementing any necessary mitigation measures.

OnIn July 16, 2004, Yanacocha obtained the approval of its EA by the MEM, and was granted an exploration permit for Cerro Quilish. Although exploration activities began in July 29, 2004, exploration activities were suspended on September 2, 2004 due to public opposition, which included a sustained blockade of the road between the City of Cajamarca and the mine site, to the exploration activities. During September 2004, individuals from the Cajamarca region conducted a sustained blockade of the road between the City of Cajamarca and the mine site, in protest of these exploration activities.site. Yanacocha suspended all drilling activities at Cerro Quilish and, the blockade was resolved. Atat the request of Yanacocha, the Cerro Quilish drilling permit was revoked in November 2004. Yanacocha has reassessedreclassified the challenges involved in obtaining required permits for Cerro Quilish primarily related to increased community concerns. Based upon this reassessment, Yanacocha has reclassified 3.9 million ounces (1. 98 million equity ounces) of gold deposit from proven and probable reserves to mineralized material not in reservesNRMs as of December 31, 2004.

Other than the legal proceedingproceedings described above, Yanacocha is involved in certain legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is material to Yanacocha or its operations. For information regarding the legal proceedings relating to the ownership of Yanacocha's equity, see "-The Company-History".

Management of Yanacocha

Executive Committee

Pursuant to the Yanacocha By-Laws, Yanacocha's Executive Committee consists of six members, all of whom are appointed by the partners of Yanacocha. Wayne W. Murdy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation has been appointed Chairman of Yanacocha's Executive Committee and Alberto Benavides de la Quintana, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, has been appointed as the Vice Chairman of Yanacocha's Executive Committee. TheCommittee.The Vice Chairman has the power to preside over the meetings of Yanacocha's Executive Committee in the Chairman's absence. The members of the Executive Committee are elected for a three-year term but may continue in their positions until the next election takes place and the newly elected members accept their positions. Alternate members are elected in the same manner as members and can act in the place of a membermembers with all of their authority when thea member is unavailable, except that an alternate member may not act as e ithereither Chairman or Vice Chairman of Yanacocha's Executive Committee. The Chairman has the right to cast the deciding vote in the event of a deadlock among Yanacocha's Executive Committee.

General Manager/Management Agreement

The Yanacocha By-Laws provide that the Yanacocha Partner'sPartners' Meeting has the power to appoint and remove the Manager of Yanacocha; the Executive Committee has the power to appoint and revokeremove other officers of Yanacocha, determine their duties and compensation and grant and revoke powers of attorney. Newmont Peru was named as Yanacocha's Manager according to a publicly filed deed, and it continues to hold that position. Newmont Peru's duties as Manager are defined in the Management Contract, (the "Management Contract"),or Management Contract, dated February 28, 1992, as amended, between Yanacocha and Newmont Peru. Pursuant to the Management Contract, Newmont Peru is responsible for managing, conducting and controlling the day-to-day operations of Yanacocha and keeping Yanacocha's Executive Committee informed of all operations through the delivery of various written reports. The Management Contract was amended as of December 19, 2000. The amendment extends the term of the Management Contract for a period of 20 ye arsyears starting at the date of amendment and provides that it may be extended for additional terms of 20 years upon request by Newmont Peru. Newmont Peru, however, may cancel the Management Contract by giving six months' prior notice to Yanacocha. The Management Contract will be deemed terminated if, due to reasons attributable to the bad management of Yanacocha, except for reasons beyond its control, Newmont Peru is unable to substantially complete the agreed work programs. In exchange for its services as Manager, Newmont Peru receives remuneration of US$2 per ounce of gold production and its equivalent for copper production paid on a quarterly basis, which amount is expected to cover the overhead and administrative expenses for the management of the operations. Also, Newmont Peru may charge Yanacocha for the salaries of employees of Newmont Peru or its affiliates who are directly involved in the operation of Yanacocha. In 2004,2005, Yanacocha accrued fees of US$6.16.7 million owed to Newmont Peru and its affiliates under the Management Contract.

Control Over Major Corporate Events

See "-By-Laws of Yanacocha" above for a description of certain provisions of Peruvian law and of the Yanacocha By-Laws relating to control over major corporate events.

Preemptive Rights and Rights of First Refusal

See "-By-Laws of Yanacocha" above for a description of certain provisions of Peruvian law and of the Yanacocha By-Laws relating to preemptive rights and rights of first refusal.

Property, Plants and Equipment

The Company'sOur Property

Introduction

The Company operates threeWe operate four mines (Julcani, Recuperada, Uchucchacua and Orcopampa) and hashave controlling interests in three mining companies which have controlling interests in the Ishihuinca, Antapite, Shila, PaulaShila-Paula and Colquijirca mines.The Companymines.We also ownsown an electric power transmission company, an engineering services consulting company and hashave minority interests in several other mining companies including a significant ownership interest in Yanacocha.Yanacocha and Cerro Verde. See "-The Company-Organizational Structure" and "-Intermediate Holding Companies, Subsidiaries and Equity Participations". Set forth below is a map of our principal mining operations as of December 31, 2005:

Effective March 2001, the Companywe temporarily suspended operations and decided to discontinue exploration efforts at the Recuperada mine and, as a result, all activity at the mine was temporarily suspended. In April 2004, the Companywe elected to resume exploration efforts at the Esperanza vein of the Recuperada mine due to an increase in the price of metals. In February 2006, the exploitation process in the Recuperada Mine resumed due to the significant increase in the price of metals and reserves in the Experanza, Camucha and Teresita veins. Until March 30, 2002, the Companywe held, indirectly through Condesa and Cedimin, a 100 percent interest in Minera Huallanca. On such date, the Companywe transferred this interest to BHL-Perú S.A.C. through the sale of all of itsour shares in Minera Huallanca for US$2 million. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Critical Accounting Estimates".AsAs of January 2, 2003, Minera Shila S.A.C. merged with and into Cedimin, increasing Buenaventura's and Condesa's, Cedimin's shareholders, their interestsCedimin. As a result of the merger, our interest in Cedimin increased from 0.0009 percent and 99.9991 percent, respectively,before the merger to 44.83 percent after the merger, and Con desa's interest in Cedimin decreased from 99.9991 percent before the merger to 55.17 percent res pectively, after the merger. In addition, on October 22, 2004, Cedimin acquired a 100 percent equity interest in Mineras Aureas, which had a 49 percent interest in Minera Paula. As a result of this acquisition, Minera Paula became wholly owned by the Company.us. As of December 31, 2004, Mineras Aureas and Minera Paula merged with and into Cedimin and are no longer separate legal entities.

The Company'sOur mining operations are located throughout Peru. The Company'sOur Julcani mine is located in the province of Angaraes in the department of Huancavelica, approximately 500 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima. The Company'sOur Uchucchacua mine is located in the province of Oyón in the department of Lima, approximately 265 kilometers northeast of the city of Lima. The Company'sOur Orcopampa mine is located in the province of Castilla in the department of Arequipa, approximately 1,350 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima. The Company'sOur Recuperada mine is located in the province of Huancavelica, in the department of Huancavelica, approximately 500 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima. The Ishihuinca mine, which is operated by aone of our majority-owned subsidiary of the Company,subsidiaries, is located in the province of Caravelí in the department of Arequipa, approximately 780 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima. The Antapite mine, which is operated by aone of our majority-owned subsidiary o f the Company,subsidiaries, is located in the province of Huaytara in thet he department of Huancavelica, approximately 434 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima. The Shila mine, which is operated by aone of our wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,subsidiaries, is located in the province of Castilla in the department of Arequipa, approximately 1,350 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima and 100 kilometers south of the Company'sour Orcopampa mine. The Paula mine, which is operated by aone of our wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,subsidiaries, is located in the province of Castilla, approximately 1,400 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima and 140 kilometers south of the Orcopampa mine.mine, and as of January 1, 2005, Paula's operating data has been consolidated with Shila's operating data. The Colquijirca mine, which is operated by aone of our majority-owned subsidiary of the Company,subsidiaries, is located approximately 285 kilometers east of Lima and 10 kilometers south of the city of Cerro de Pasco. The Yanacocha mine, in which the Company haswe have a 43.65 percent interest, is located in the province and department of Cajamarca, approximately 900 kilometers north of Lima. The Cerro Verde mine, in which we have a 18.5 percent interest, is located in the department of Arequipa.

Operating Properties

Orcopampa

The Orcopampa mine is wholly owned and operated by the Company. The Company leasesus. We lease the rights to the mining concessions of Orcopampa from a group of private investors. This lease, which was renewed in September 2003 and expires in 2043, stipulates a payment from the Companyus equal to 10 percent of its net sales revenues.production value, subject to certain conditions. Operations started in the Orcopampa mine in 1965. In 2004, the Company2005, we made lease payments of US$6.6S/.27.5 million. The CompanyWe operated Orcopampa as a silver mine until the late 1980s,1990s, when the Companywe also began to mine gold-bearing veins. In December 1996, Orcopampa S.A., then owner and operator of the Orcopampa mine, merged into the Company.us. As a result of the merger, Orcopampa S.A. assigned, and the Companywe assumed, the right to the mining concessions of Orcopampa. At December 31, 2004,2005, the net total fixed assets of Orcopampa were approximately S/.120.5.112.8 million (US$36.734.2 million).

The Orcopampa mine is located in the province of Castilla in the department of Arequipa, approximately 1,350 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima at an altitude of between 3,800 and 4,500 meters above sea level. Access is by a 192-kilometer unpaved public road, which connects to the Pan American highway, and by airstrip.

Mining at Orcopampa is conducted underground using the mechanized cut-and-fill.cut-and-fill method. Ore is processed at a mill located at Orcopampa. Until February 2004, the mill had a rated capacity of 1,200 dry short tons ("DST")DST per day and utilized both bulk flotation and gravity concentration processes.

Until February 2004, flotation concentrates were exported to different smelters around the world, while gravity concentrates were and arecontinued to be treated at Los Volcanes, a small cyanidation plant located next to the Orcopampa mill which has been in operation since 1989. Until1989.Until the end of 2001, Los Volcanes produced gold/silver electrolytic precipitates which were smelted and refined in Lima and then sold to Johnson Matthey. During the second half of 2001, the Companywe installed a Merrill-Crowe circuit and a smelter which began operations in December of that year, allowing the Companyus to produce doré bars from the gold and silver precipitate produced in the cyanidation plant of Los Volcanes during 2002.Volcanes.

Positive results of exploration conducted in the Nazareno and Prometida veins, changes in the characteristics of the ore and results from metallurgical tests performed in 2002 have suggested the replacement of the flotation process with direct cyanidation of the ore. In January 2003, the Companywe initiated construction of a cyanidation circuit which commenced operations on a continuous basis in March 2004 and therefore eliminated the production of flotation concentrates. The cyanidation circuit includes a 70 foot thickener from which a gold rich solution is obtained and sent to the Merrill Crowe unit for gold precipitation, six agitator tanks to which cyanide and activated carbon are added (Carbon in Leach process), and a carbon desorption circuit which includes an electrolytic cell for the recovery of gold and silver as precipitate. The Electrolytic and Merrill Crowe precipitates are smelted into doré bars prior to shipment.

Electric power is generated and supplied by a 3,900 kw hydroelectric plant and power line, connected to the Peruvian national electricity grid on September 12, 2002, owned by the Companyus and, when water is scarce, it can be provided by a 3,976 kw diesel generator. Water for operations at Orcopampa is obtained from a lake and three rivers.

In 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company2005 we continued exploration activities in the Nazareno vein, and 2143 drill holes explored in the western and eastern section of the vein confirm that economically viable mineralization extends over that area. Another 713 drill holes explored in the eastern part of the Prometida vein indicate good ore shoots in both the Prometida and Nazareno veins. In addition, the developmentexploration of the Prometida and Nazareno veins has led to the discovery of new mineral reserves and, in 2004,2005, mineral reserves increased 2316.6 percent in gold content reaching 1,080,8901,137,215 DST of mineral with a minimum grade of 0.6140.68 ounces of gold per short ton and 0.20.27 percent ounces of silver per short ton with a metallic content of 663,666773,306 ounces of gold. To facilitate ventilation and access to the eastern region of Prometida, where ongoing reserve measurement and estimation efforts are being carried out, the Companywe finished construction of the "Mario" ramp. In addition, the Company haswe have commenced construction on twoof three additional ramps to facilitate access to ore reserves and resources at lowerthe 3,590 and 3,990 levels.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the periods shown for Orcopampa, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

Year Ending December 31,

Year Ending December 31,(1)

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mining Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

255,350

349,350

350,951

393,210

431,241

349,350

350,951

393,210

431,241

461,091

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.405

0.451

0.527

0.504

0.518

0.451

0.527

0.504

0.518

0.530

Average silver grade (oz./t)

1.50

0.63

0.13

0.20

0.34

0.63

0.13

0.20

0.34

0.30

Average copper grade

0.03%

0.013%

-

-

0.013%

-

-

Production:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

96,843

145,910

160,017

180,725

211,388

145,910

160,017

180,725

211,388

233,182

Silver (oz.)

292,986

156,600

28,378

63,135

97,359

156,600

28,378

63,135

97,359

86,080

Copper (ST)

59

40

-

-

40

-

-

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

90.4

92.6

86.5

86.5

93.7

92.6

86.5

93.7

95.4

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

75.9

70.9

62.2

77.3

64.9

70.9

62.2

77.3

64.9

63.1

________

  1. Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

The increase in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 gold production was mainly due to the Company'sour exploration activities in the Nazareno vein and the developmentexploration of the Prometida, Prosperidad and Lucy Piso veins. In 2004, the increase in gold production is primarily due to a considerable increase in the recovery of gold.

The increase in gold production in 2005 compared to the previous year was due to a 6.96 percent increase in total run of mine ore treated at the plant, a slightly higher grade of gold in the feed and a 17 percent increase in gold recovery.

Uchucchacua

The Uchucchacua mine is wholly owned and operated by the Company.us. Operations started in 1975, and Uchucchacua is currently the Company'sour largest producer of silver. At December 31, 2004,2005, the net total fixed assets of Uchucchacua were approximately S/.74.5 million.84.0million (US$22.725.4 million).

Uchucchacua is located in the province of Oyón in the department of Lima, approximately 265 kilometers northeast of the city of Lima at an altitude of between 4,000 and 5,000 meters above sea level. Access is by an unpaved road, 145 kilometers in length, which connects to the Pan American highway.

Mining at Uchucchacua is conducted underground utilizing cut-and-fill stopping, shrinkage stopping, and sublevel stopping methods. Ore is processed at a mill located at Uchucchacua. The mill, which has a rated capacity of 2,2502,300 DST per day and which had a 97.797.1 percent utilization rate in 2004,2005, utilizes differential flotation to obtain a lead-silver concentrate and a zinc concentrate.

Electric power is generated by a Company-owned 3,400 kw hydroelectric plant that we own and by a 3,025 kw diesel generator. The Company utilizesWe utilize a power line connecting Uchucchacua to the Peruvian national electricity grid and has electrical distribution facilities within the Uchucchacua mine. Water for operations at Uchucchacua is obtained from three lakes.

In 2001, the Companywe started construction to deepen the Luz shaft for the purpose of improving the extraction and transportation infrastructure of the mine. Construction continued in 2002 and the Companywe commenced operation of the Luz shaft in July 2003.During 2003, the Companywe completed the construction of a new 1.7 kilometerskilometer drainage tunnel, the Patón tunnel, which measures 4.5 kilometers from a point close to Lake Patón up to the main shaft and serves to explore the veins of the Plomopampa and Casualidad zones. On December 6, 2003, the Patón tunnel was connected to the Carmen mine. In addition to facilitating drainage, the Patón tunnel also improves ventilation and the output of hydroelectric power, reducing electric energy purchased from the national grid for pumping and ventilation by 7.2 MWH, electric energy generation by 1.6 MWH and decreasing the use of fuel-driven generator sets at peak hours. The implementation of the tunnel results in an annu alannual savings of US$1 million.

At the end of 2003, the Companywe commenced evaluating the possibility of recovering the silver valuevalues still contained in the final tails produced in the concentrator plants. Metallurgical investigations indicated that an additional five to eight percent of the silver value could be recovered by a cyanide leach of thea silver bearing pyrite concentrate previously obtained by flotation of the final tails. Further metallurgical evaluations performed during 2004 indicated that cyanide leaching is very effective when applied to a bulk zinc-silver concentrate obtained by flotation of the lead-silver final tails flotation circuit. After cyanidation, a zinc concentrate may still be produced from the cyanidation residue. Due to encouraging results in the last quarter of 2004, the Companywe commenced engineering studies and the construction of a 300 metric tons per day cyandiation circuit, which is expected to commence operations by JanuaryJune 2006. During the third quarter of 2005, samples of an oxide ore located in the upper l evels of the mine were tested for cyanidation and indicated that the silver contained in this ore can be successfully leached by cyanidation. Based on these results, we have decided to install a crushing and grinding circuit for the comminution of the oxide ore and new leaching tanks and filters. The oxide circuit is expected to commence operations by July 2006.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the periods shown for Uchucchacua, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

Year Ending December 31,

Year Ending December 31,(1)

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mining Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

725,775

743,290

744,690

747,190

795,036

743,290

744,690

747,190

795,036

813,220

Average silver grade (oz./t)

16.0

17.47

16.94

17.20

16.79

17.47

16.94

17.20

16.79

16.93

Average zinc grade (%)

1.54

1.61

1.53

1.40

1.48

1.61

1.53

1.40

1.48

1.39

Average lead grade (%)

1.06

1.20

1.19

1.09

1.13

1.20

1.19

1.09

1.13

1.12

Production:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silver (oz.)

8,710,424

9,780,260

9,387,091

9,575,605

9,832,393

9,780,260

9,387,091

9,575,605

9,832,393

10,213,794

Zinc (ST)

7,344

7,789

7,759

6,216

7,477

7,789

7,759

6,216

7,477

6,553

Lead (ST)

6,845

8,010

7,718

7,218

8,042

8,010

7,718

7,218

8,042

8,067

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

74.8

75.3

74.4

74.4

73.67

75.3

74.4

73.67

74.20

Theincrease________

(1) Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

The increase in silver production in 20042005 was mainly due to a consequence2.3 percent increase in the amount ofthe further development ore treated and exploitation of the Rosario ore body at the Carmen Mine and the Magaly and Rossana ore bodies at the Socorro mine.an 0.53 percent increase silver recovery.

Julcani

The Julcani mine is wholly owned and operated by the Company. The Companyus. We acquired Julcani in 1953 as itsour first operating mine. In November 1999, due to the depletion of gold and silver reserves, the Company waswe were forced to suspend production in Julcani and carry out exploration activities only. In 2000, the Companywe started to carry out the actions required by the Environmental Shutdown Plan, orPlan de Cierre Ambiental, and undertook only limited exploration and minimal development efforts primarily in the Herminia zone in 2001. As a result, ore mined in the Herminia zone was primarily milled to produce copper and lead concentrates until 2003. In 2003, the Companywe initiated an exploration program in the Acchilla area. In 2004, the Companywe continued the exploration and initiated exploitation of ore with positive results. At December 31, 2004,2005, total estimated ore reserves were 102,626168,585 DST with 22.4221.95 ounces of silver and 1.71.60 percent of lead per short ton. At December 31, 2004,2005, the n etnet total fixed assets of Julcani were approximately S/.0.6.0.9 million (US$0.20.3 million).

Julcani is located in the province of Angaraes in the department of Huancavelica, approximately 500 kilometers southeast of Lima at an altitude of between 4,200 and 5,000 meters above sea level. Access is by a 195 kilometer unpaved public road, which connects to a paved public road, and by airstrip.

Run of mine ore is processed in a concentrator plant located 50 meters from the mine entrance. The ore is crushed and ground, and bulk flotation is used thereafter to obtain a silver-gold-lead concentrate. The plant has a rated capacity of 300 DST per day and had a 61.869.5 percent utilization rate in 2004.2005.

Electric power is generated by three Conenhua hydroelectric plants. Power generation capacity from these plants is 800 kw (Huapa), 1,200 kw (Tucsipampa) and 760 kw (Ingenio), respectively. The CompanyWe also reliesrely on the Peruvian national electricity grid through Electro Perú, Peru's national electric utility, for its remaining electrical power. Water for operations of Julcani is obtained from a creek, two springs and a lake.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the periods shown for Julcani, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

Year Ending December 31,

Year Ending December 31,(1)

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mining Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

5,300

38,500

61,500

37,650

58,900

38,500

61,500

37,650

58,900

73,700

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.010

0.019

0.021

0.016

0.002

0.019

0.021

0.016

0.002

0.002

Average silver grade (oz./t)

19.2

20.2

15.28

15.33

18.50

20.2

15.28

15.33

18.50

18.80

Average lead grade

0.60

0.44

0.49

0.83

1.68

0.44

0.49

0.83

1.68

2.02

Average copper grade(%)

0.37

0.60

0.51

0.40

0.17

0.60

0.51

0.40

0.17

0.13

Production:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

30

452

820

415

59

452

820

415

59

40

Silver (oz.)

95,077

715,216

833,481

526,516

1,019,743

715,216

833,481

526,516

1,019,743

1,302,596

Lead (ST)

28

132

77

225

854

132

77

225

854

1,308

Copper (ST)

17

191

271

104

83

191

271

104

83

82

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

56.8

61.8

63.5

68.9

50.7

61.8

63.5

68.9

50.7

35.8

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

92.9

92.0

88.7

91.2

93.7

92.0

88.7

91.2

93.7

94.0

________

(1) Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

The significant increase in silver production in 2004 reflected the2005 was mainly due to a 25.1 percent increase in run of mine ore mined at Julcani astreated in the plant and a resultslightly higher grade of new explorationsilver in the feed of the Acchilla area.0.3 ounces of silver per short ton.

Colquijirca

The Colquijirca mine is wholly owned by El Brocal. El Brocal was formed in 1956 and is engaged in the extraction, concentration and sale of concentrates of polymetallic minerals, mainly zinc, lead and silver. AtAs of December 31, 2002, the Companywe held a 59.02 percent interest in Inversiones Colquijirca and a 32.83 percent interest in El Brocal's mining properties. Other unrelated mining investors hold the balance of the share capital of Inversiones Colquijirca. In January 2003, El Brocal conducted a US$1 million capital increase to finance the exploration of the Marcapunta deposit, reduction of the arsenic content and enhancement of the gold content of the deposit's copper resources. The CompanyWe participated in this capital share increase by exercising its and TCL'sTeck Cominco's interest in El Brocal, through each of their interests in Inversiones Colquijirca, to invest approximately S/.1,500,000. As a result, the Company'sour interest in Inversiones Colquijirca increased from 59.02 percent to 59.90 pe rcent.percent.

In addition, as a result of the stock dividends, which in the aggregate were equivalent to S/.2.9 million, distributed by the Companyus in November 2002 in the form of El Brocal shares, Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A. became asociedad anónima abierta (open stock company) in 2003. At December 31, 2004,2005, the net total fixed assets of El Brocal were approximately S/.55.7.55.5 million (US$17.016.2 million).

The Colquijirca mine is located 285 kilometers east of the city of Lima and 10 kilometers south of the city of Cerro de Pasco. El Brocal produces zinc and lead/silver concentrates. The Colquijirca mine consists of three important polymetallic deposits: the Tajo Norte deposit, which contains zinc, silver and lead ore; the Marcapunta deposit, which contains an auriferous mineralization in breccia oxides, a non-arsenic copper chalcosite mineralization, and an arsenic copper enargite mineralization as a continuation of the mineralized mantles of the Marcapunta Norte; and the San Gregorio deposit, which contains zinc.

Mining is conducted through the open-pit method. El Brocal's zinc concentrate typically contains 50 percent zinc, while its lead concentrate typically contains 60 percent lead. The concentrates are sold locally and also exported to Europe and Asia (primarily Korea and China) for refining. El Brocal is currently completing necessary permitting requirements to expand the mill located at Colquijirca to increase treatment capacity to 4,000 DST per day and such increase is estimated to be fully commissioned by the third quarter of 2005. The mill had a 100 percent utilization rate in 2004.2005.

The Colquijirca mine primarily relies on a power line, connected to the Peruvian national electricity grid in November 2002, for its electrical power.

El Brocal is continuing with its waste removal campaign at the Tajo Norte deposit to increase the extraction of ore and to permit the eventual joining of the Principal and Mercedes Norte open pit mines. In 2001, El Brocal initiated an intensive exploration program, financed by a capital increase in 2002 at the Marcapunta deposit, to confirm mineral resourcesmineralization and find possible extensions. In 2002, exploration revealed gold-bearing arsenic copper resources in the Marcapunta deposit.El Brocal's production greatly increased in 2003 to 1,409,104 short tons of ore, a growth of 6.5 percent from 2002. In 2004, El Brocal achieved a record ore throughput of 1,492,554 DST, representing a 5.9%5.9 percent increase from 2003. In 2005, El Brocal achieved another record ore throughput of 1,513,964 DST, representing a 1.4 percent increase from 2004.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the Colquijirca mine calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

Year Ending December 31,

Year Ending December 31,(1)

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mining Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

1,059,067

1,218,742

1,322,942

1,409,104

1,492,569

1,218,742

1,322,942

1,409,104

1,492,569

1,513,964

Average silver grade (oz./t)

3.4

4.2

2.59

2.93

3.23

 

 

2.59

2.93

3.23

3.96

Average zinc grade (%)

5.50

5.50

5.94

5.55

5.82

5.50

5.94

5.55

5.82

5.95

Average lead grade (%)

2.30

2.20

2.24

2.32

2.89

2.20

2.24

2.32

2.89

2.89

Production:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silver (oz.)

1,833,432

3,453,796

2,420,034

2,895,735

3,399,130

3,453,796

2,420,034

2,895,735

3,399,130

4,394,940

Zinc (ST)

46,546

50,034

60,968

61,733

63,448

50,034

60,968

61,733

63,448

62,997

Lead (ST)

17,143

16,918

19,484

21,766

27,069

16,918

19,484

21,766

27,069

26,244

Recovery rate (silver) in zinc (%)

29.55

26.29

28.07

26.67

26.07

26.29

28.07

26.67

26.07

25.3

Recovery rate (zinc) (%)

79.30

74.61

77.63

78.89

73.0

74.61

77.63

78.89

73.0

69.9

Recovery rate (silver) in lead (%)

51.02

44.88

42.71

43.49

44.46

44.88

42.71

43.49

44.46

48.0

Recovery rate (lead) (%)

70.67

64.06

65.85

66.50

62.82

64.06

65.85

66.50

62.82

60.0

________

(1) Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

The increase in silver production in 20042005 was mainly due to a 22.6 percent increase in the higher head gradessilver grade in ore reserves and increased ore production in 2004.the feed.

Ishihuinca

In 1985, the Companywe purchased 51.0 percent of Inminsur, the owner and operator of the Ishihuinca mine. As a result of subsequent purchases of shares of Inminsur, the Companywe currently ownsown 78.04 percent of Inminsur. Inminsur has leased the rights to the mining concessions of Ishihuinca from a third party. The lease agreement, which expires in 2015, stipulates payment by Inminsur to the lessor of a royalty of 7 percent of the price of the concentrates sold. In 2004,2005, Ishihuinca paid US$650,0000.7 million in royalties. At December 31, 2004,2005, the net total fixed assets of Ishihuinca were approximately S/.6.5.5.6 million (US$1.91.6 million).

The Ishihuinca mine is located in the province of Caravelí in the department of Arequipa, approximately 780 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima at an altitude of 2,200 meters above sea level. Access is by the Pan American highway.

Mining is conducted underground utilizing the conventional cut-and-fill stopping method. Ore is processed at a mill located at Ishihuinca. The mill, which has a rated capacity of 200 DST per day and which had a 7581.6 percent utilization rate in 2004,2005, utilizes bulk flotation and gravity concentration processes. The bulk flotation process produces a copper/gold concentrate, which is exported to a smelter, and a gold bearing pyrite concentrate. The gravity concentrates, from the gravity concentration processes, are treated by cyanidation and vat leaching. The dissolved gold obtained from the cyanidation of the gold bearing pyrite concentrate and gravity concentrate is precipitatesprecipitated on zinc dust (Merrill-Crowe process) and the resulting cyanidation electrolytic precipitates are refined in Lima and then sold to Johnson Matthey. The mill at the Ishihuinca mine was last modernized and expanded to operate at its current capacity in 1993.

Electric power is generated by three electric generators, with a capacity of 709 kw, 804 kw and 800 kw, respectively. Water for operations at Ishihuinca is obtained from nearby wells.

Exploration conducted in 2002 and 2003 indicated economically viable mineralization at Ishihuinca, suggesting that, although ore deposits at the mine seemed depleted, it may still contain reserves that warrant aggressive exploration. In 2003, the Companywe initiated an exploration program in the Córdova area, located 2 kilometers north of the Company'sour Ishihuinca operations with positive results. In 2004, the Companywe identified the Prolongación Córdova vein in the Cordova area with with underground workings of 2,110 meters and an estimated 5,765 metric tons at 14.56 grams per ton of gold with an average thickness of 0.85 meters. In 2005, we continued exploration of the Company plans to conduct additionalProlongación Córdova vein in the Cordova area with underground workings.workings of 2,158 meters and an estimated 20,015 metric tons at 13.49 grams per ton of gold with an average thickness of 0.90 meters.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the periods shown for Ishihuinca, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

Year Ending December 31,

Year Ending December 31,(1)

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mining Operations:

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

42,418

20,337

38,416

57,463

60,213

20,337

38,416

57,463

60,213

65,435

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.282

0.560

0.480

0.508

0.474

0.560

0.480

0.508

0.474

0.436

Average copper grade (%)

0.34

0.28

0.31

0.41

0.345

0.28

0.31

0.41

0.345

0.40

Production:

 

 

Gold (oz.)

9,895

9,770

15,694

25,287

24,505

9,770

15,694

25,287

24,505

23,911

Copper (ST)

128

46

89

194

169

46

89

194

169

198

Zinc (ST)

46,546

-

-

Lead (ST)

17,143

-

-

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

82.86

85.70

85.11

86.62

85.80

85.70

85.11

86.62

85.80

83.7

________

(1) Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

The increaseslight decrease in the production of gold in 20022005 was mainly due to the increase in the grade of gold produced since 2001.a lower recovery rate. The increase in production in 2003 was mainly due to higher levels of tonnage placed in leach pads and the higher level of head grade of ore placed. In 2004, despite increased levels of tonnage placed in leach pads, the quantity of gold recovered decreased due to a reduction in the grade of ore placed.

Antapite

The Antapite mine is wholly owned by the Company.us. However, the Company haswe have leased the mine until July 2015 to Inminsur, which is 78.04 percent owned by the Companyus and 21.96 percent owned by Brandon Properties Inc., a Panamanian corporation. Brandon Properties Inc. acquired 280,824 shares and 335,754 shares, collectively representing 21.96 percent, of Inminsur from Bernando Alvarez Calderon and Boris de la Piedra, respectively on December 26, 2003. At December 31, 2004,2005, the net total fixed assets of Antapite were approximately S/.68.3.61.0 million (US$20.817.8 million).

Antapite is located in the province of Huaytará, in the department of Huancavelica, approximately 434 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima at an altitude of approximately 3,400 meters above sea level. The mine is accessed primarily by the PanamericanPan American Highway and local roads. The Antapite mine consists of 20,800 hectares and Inminsur has identified epithermal vein gold deposits containing an estimated 400,000 tons of gold ore, with average grades of 0.5 ounces per ton. The Zorro Rojo and Reyna veins are the main source of ore reserves and developmentmining efforts are focused on these veins. Inminsur has initiated exploration of the Pampeñita and Antapite veins, which run parallel and close to the Zorro Rojo vein, and is also conducting exploration to confirm the presence of important drill intersections in the Reyna vein located two kilometers from the Zorro Rojo vein.

Mining is conducted underground utilizing the conventional cut-and-fill stopping method. Ore is processed at a cyanidation plant located at Antapite. The plant, which was completed in June 2001 with capacity for 300 DST per day, has had capacity of 450 DST per day since May 2003. The plant had a 100percent97.8 percent utilization rate in 2004.2005.

The Antapite mine obtains approximately 98.5 percent of its electric power through the Peruvian national electricity grid and the remaining power through Electrical Supplier Machine Sultzer. Water for operations at Antapite is obtained from an underground drainage system.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the periods shown for Antapite, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

 

Year Ending December 31,

 

2001(1)

2002

2003

2004

Mining Operations:

 

 

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

60.178

121,161

155,494

179,785

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.64

0.60

0.59

0.57

Average silver grade (oz./t)

1.60

1.33

0.94

0.74

Production:

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

34,607

72,380

84,361

97,137

Silver (oz.)

55,304

98,121

91,492

86,162

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

89.4

92.90

91.80

94.40

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

57.5

60.00

62.50

64.50

_______________

 

Year Ending December 31,(1)

 

2001(2)

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mining Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

60.178

121,161

155,494

179,785

179,873

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.64

0.60

0.59

0.57

0.60

Average silver grade (oz./t)

1.60

1.33

0.94

0.74

0.81

Production:

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

34,607

72,380

84,361

97,137

103,931

Silver (oz.)

55,304

98,121

91,492

86,162

102,222

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

89.4

92.90

91.80

94.40

95.90

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

57.5

60.00

62.50

64.50

70.40

________

(1) Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

(2) Mining operations started in July 2001.

The increase in 20042005 in gold production was mainly due tohigher levelsto an increase in the grade of tonnage placedgold in leach pads.the feed by 0.03 ounces of gold per short ton.

Shila

Minera Shila S.A.C. (", or Minera Shila")Shila, owned 100 percent of the Shila mining operation and held, directly and indirectly, through Condesa, a 100 percent equity interest in Minera Shila. As of January 2, 2003, Minera Shila merged with and into Cedimin andis no longer a separate legal entity. Cedimin operates the Shila mine, which began production in 1989. As of December 31, 2004, Minera Paula merged with and into Cedimin, and as of January 1, 2005, the Paula mine's operating results have been consolidated with the Shila mine's operating data. At December 31, 2004,2005, the net total fixed assets of the Shila and Paula mining operationoperations were approximately S/.10.4.12.7 million (US$3.23.8 million).

In December 2000, Ampato was integrated into Minera Shila and is no longer a separate legal entity. As a result, Cedimin now holds the properties formerly held by Ampato, including 936.3 hectares of mining rights in the Arhuiera community (Orcopampa district). The Shila mine will continue to explore gold and silver veins in this mining area.

The Shila mine is located in the province of Castilla in the department of Arequipa, approximately 1,350 kilometers southeast of Lima and 25 kilometers south of the Orcopampa mining operation at an altitude of between 4,650 and 5,400 meters above sea level. Access is by a 250-kilometer unpaved road.

Due to the high cost of transportation and smelting of the concentrates, the Companywe installed a small cyanidation plant at the Shila mine, which entered into operation in August of 2001 with a net capacity of 3,200 MTmetric tons per year.

Mining is conducted underground utilizing the conventional cut-and-fill stopping method. Ore is processed at a mill located at the Shila mine with a rated capacity of 250 DST per day. The mill had a 45.72an 81.1 percent utilization rate in 2004.2005. The mill utilizes bulk flotation and gravity concentration processes. Flotation concentrates are exported to smelters. Gravity concentrates are treated by cyanidation and vat leaching at the Shila mine, and the resulting cyanidation electrolytic precipitates are refined in Lima and then sold to Buenaventuraus and BHL. The millDuring 2005, agitator tanks were added at the Shila mine was last modernizedwhich resulted in a solution with a 67 percent flotation concentration and expanded100 percent gravimetric concentration, that is sent to operate at its current capacitythe Merrill Crow unit for gold precipitation. The Merrill Crowe precipitates averaged 14.39 percent of gold and 84.20 percent of silver in 2000.2005 and are transferred to Lima, Peru for commercialization.

Electric power for Shila is provided by four diesel generators, two with a capacity of 650 kw, one with a capacity of 1,135 kw and one with a capacity of 1,600 kw, and a power line, connected to the Peruvian national electricity grid on April 9, 2003. Water for operations at Shila is obtained from runoff from a snow peak.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for the periods shown for Shila, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

Year Ending December 31,

Year Ending December 31,(1)

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005(2)

Mining Operations:

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

51,670

52,633

52,015

50,085

41,151

52,633

52,015

50,085

41,151

64,050

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.47

0.45

0.38

0.47

0.45

0.38

0.45

Average silver grade (oz./t)

7.4

7.9

11.7

13.80

17.50

7.9

11.7

13.80

17.50

5.9

Production:

 

 

Gold (oz.)

23,510

23,618

21,947

17,772

14,086

23,618

21,947

17,772

14,086

26,978

Silver (oz.)

346,469

350,969

479,415

592,261

587,181

350,969

479,415

592,261

587,181

330,184

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

97.30

96.10

93.35

94.10

90.0

96.10

93.35

94.10

90.0

93

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

90.20

86.60

78.78

85.70

81.3

86.60

78.78

85.70

81.3

83

________

  1. Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.
  2. Data for 2005 reflects the consolidation of Paula's operating data has been with and into Shila's operating data.

The decreaseincrease in 20042005 in gold production was mainly due to a reduction in the quantityconsolidation of ore milled.the Paula mine's operating results into the Shila mine's operating results.

Paula

Minera Paula ownedowns 100 percent of the Paula mining operation. Prior to October 22, 2004, Minera Aureas S.A. held a 49 percent interest in Minera Paula and the Companywe held the remaining 51 percent interest through Cedimin. On October 22, 2004, Cedimin acquired a 100 percent equity interest in Inversiones Mineras Aureas S.A.C. (", or Mineras Aureas")Aureas, and Minera Paula became wholly owned by the Company.us. As of December 31, 2004, Mineras Aureas S.A.C. and Minera Paula merged with and into Cedimin and are no longer separate legal entities. As of January 1, 2005, Paula's operating data will behas been consolidated with Shila's operating data. As of December 31, 2004, the net total fixed assets of Minera Paula were approximately S/.3.0 million (US$0.9 million).

The Paula mine is located in the province of Castilla in the department of Arequipa, approximately 1,400 kilometers southeast of the city of Lima and 140 kilometers south of the Orcopampa mining operation, at an altitude of between 5,000 and 5,400 meters above sea level. Access is by a 300 kilometer highway from Arequipa.

Mining is conducted underground utilizing the conventional fill ascending method. After being processed at the Shila processing plant, the concentrates are sold to the Companyus and then are treated by cyanidation and vat leaching. The resulting precipitates are refined in Lima and then sold to Johnson Matthey. The Shila processing plant

In January 2005, Paula was last modernizedconnected to the Peruvian national electricity grid and expanded to operateceased operations at its current capacity in 2000.

Twotwo diesel generators, each with ana 65 kw installed capacity provide Minera Paula with electric power.capacity. The water for operations at Paula is obtained from runoff from a snowpeak.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for Paula, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

 

Year Ending December 31,

Mining Operations:

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Ore mined (ST)

8,006

9,689

9,512

14,880

16,831

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.79

0.88

0.62

0.73

0.645

Average silver grade (oz./t)

6.90

6.91

5.33

4.83

4.83

Production:

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

6,057

8,175

6,632

10.867

10,387

Silver (oz.)

48,255

59,309

54,658

68,914

73,594

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

92.80

95.30

93.40

95.80

94.80

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

84.10

88.60

86.90

91.40

89.00

 

Year Ending December 31,(1)

Mining Operations:

2001

2002

2003

2004(2)

Ore mined (ST)

9,689

9,512

14,880

16,831

Average gold grade (oz./t)

0.88

0.62

0.73

0.645

Average silver grade (oz./t)

6.91

5.33

4.83

4.83

Production:

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

8,175

6,632

10.867

10,387

Silver (oz.)

59,309

54,658

68,914

73,594

Recovery rate (gold) (%)

95.30

93.40

95.80

94.80

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

88.60

86.90

91.40

89.00

____________________

(1) Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

(2) Data until January 1, 2005, when Paula's operating data was consolidated with Shila's operating data.

The increase in silver production in 2004 was mainly due to higher levels of tonnage placed in leach pads and the higher level of head grade of ore placed.

Huallanca

Minera Huallanca owns the Pucarrajo mining operation. Minera Huallanca was a wholly owned subsidiary of Cedimin until March 31, 2002, on which date the Companywe sold itsour interest in Minera Huallanca to BHL-Perú S.A.C.

The Pucarrajo mine is located in the province of Bolognesi, in the department of Ancash, approximately 441 kilometers northeast of the city of Lima at an altitude of between 4,300 and 4,700 meters above sea level. Access to the mine is by a 350 kilometer paved highway.

Mining is conducted underground by the mechanical dynamic reduction method. The minerals are processed in a concentration mill located 8 kilometers from the mine. The mill, which has a treatment capacity of 500 DST per day, produces lead, silver and zinc concentrates that are exported to smelters overseas. The mill had aan 82.8 percent utilization rate until March 2002.

Electric power is generated by a diesel power generator with a 650 kw capacity and water for the operations is obtained from small lakes in the area.

Set forth below are certain unaudited operating data for Minera Huallanca, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of the mine's production.

Year Ending December 31,

Year Ending December 31,(1)

Year Ending December 31,(1)

2000

2001

2002(1)

2001

2002(2)

 

 

 

 

Mining Operations:

Mining Operations:

 

 

 

 

Ore mined (ST)

Ore mined (ST)

95,660

146,079

41,080

146,079

41,080

Average silver grade (oz./t)

Average silver grade (oz./t)

4.33

2.54

2.57

2.54

2.57

Average zinc grade

Average zinc grade

8.95%

8.60%

8.95%

8.60%

8.95%

Average lead grade

Average lead grade

2.03%

0.94%

0.52%

0.94%

0.52%

Production:

Production:

 

 

 

 

Silver (oz.)

Silver (oz.)

312,262

215,498

45,196

215,498

45,196

Zinc (ST)

Zinc (ST)

7,027

11,590

3,420

11,590

3,420

Lead (ST)

Lead (ST)

1,536

1,083

154

1,083

154

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

Recovery rate (silver) (%)

67.58

58.10

42.81

58.10

42.81

Recovery rate (zinc) (%)

Recovery rate (zinc) (%)

90.44

92.25

93.02

92.25

93.02

Recovery rate (lead) (%)

Recovery rate (lead) (%)

87.11

78.87

72.09

78.87

72.09

____________

________

(1) Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.

(2) Data until March 31, 2002, when the Companywe sold itsour interest in Huallanca.

Reserves

The Company calculates itsWe calculate our ore reserves by methods generally applied within the mining industry and in accordance with Commission Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10.Industry Guide 7. All mineral reserves are estimated quantities of proven and probable ore that under present and anticipated conditions may be economically mined and processed.

The proven and probable ore reserve figures presented in this Annual Report are estimates of the Companyour and Yanacocha,Yanacocha's estimates, and no assurance can be given that the indicated level of recovery of gold, silver and certain other metals will be realized. See "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Reserves Estimates".

The term "proven reserves" means ore reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, and grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling, and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established. The term "probable reserves" means ore reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

The following table lists the proven and probable ore reserves at December 31, 20042005 for each mining operation in which the Company haswe have at least a 50 percent interest as well as the average grade of such ore, calculated on the basis of 100 percent of each mine's reserves and US$350 per ounce of gold and US$5.256.30 per ounce of silver.

Proven and Probable Ore Reserves at December 31, 20042005(1)(2)

Julcani

Uchucchacua

Orcopampa

Colquijirca

Ishihuinca

Antapite

Shila

Paula

Total/Average

Julcani

Uchucchacua

Orcopampa

Colquijirca

Ishihuinca

Antapite

Shila-Paula(3)

Total/Average

Ore Reserves (ST)

102,625

3,961,710

1,080,890

9,730,660

65,863

478,437

13,712

73,986

15,507,883

168,585

5,423,760

1,137,215

9,245,073

51,450

540,971

100,800

16,667,854

Grade:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz./t)

-

-

0.614

-

0.439

0.412

0.344

0.507

0.060

-

-

0.680

-

0.397

0.362

0.464

0.062

Silver (oz./t)

22.42

17.02

0.25

2.60

-

15.10

3.50

6.18

21.95

16.38

0.27

2.49

-

0.52

2.90

6.99

Copper (%)

0.17

-

-

0.07

-

0.045

0.20

-

-

0.07

0.40

-

0.042

Zinc (%)

-

1.99

-

6.02

-

4.29

-

2.08

-

5.68

-

3.83

Lead (%)

1.17

1.51

-

2.28

-

1.82

1.60

1.56

-

2.01

-

1.64

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (oz.)

-

-

663,666

-

28,914

197,116

4,717

37,511

931,924

-

-

773,306

-

20,434

196,032

46,771

1,036,543

Silver (oz.)

2,300,853

67,428,304

270,223

25,397,023

-

207,051

258,951

95,862,405

3,700,441

88,850,722

307,048

23,020,231

-

281,700

292,320

116,452,462

Copper (ST)

174

-

-

6,811

-

6,985

337

-

-

6,471

205

-

7,013

Zinc (ST)

-

78,838

-

585,786

-

664,624

-

112,572

-

525,120

-

637,692

Lead (ST)

1,201

59,822

-

221,859

-

282,882

2,697

84,513

-

185,826

-

273,036

______________

  1. Reserves as stated are diluted and mineable.
  2. Incorporates losses for mining dilution and recovery.
  3. Reflects the consolidation as of January 1, 2005 of the operating data of Paula with that of Shila.

Seven underground mines and one open pit mine, Colquijirca, comprise the Company'sour mining operations. Since establishing a significant amount of reserves in underground mines requires costly and extensive exploration programs, the Company,we have, in order to control costs, has traditionally pursued an exploration and development program in itsour mines designed to establish an amount of reserves sufficient to permit the steady production of minerals over an extended period of time. The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of production of ore, gold and silver and the average grade of gold and silver for each of the Company'sour eight mines for the ten-year period ended December 31, 2004,2005, calculated in each case on the basis of 100 percent of the relevant mine's production.

Julcani

Uchucchacua

Orcopampa

Colquijirca

Ishihuinca

Antapite

Shila

Paula

Total

Julcani

Uchucchacua

Orcopampa

Colquijirca

Ishihuinca

Antapite

Shila-Paula(3)

Total

Ore mined
(ST)

58,900

795,036

431,242

1,492,569

60,213

179,785

41,151

16,831

3,075,727

Ore mined
(ST) #9; 9;

73,700

813,220

461,091

1,513,964

65,435

179,873

64,050

3,171,333

Gold produced (oz.)

59

-

211,388

-

24,505

97,137

14,086

10,387

357,562

40

-

233,182

-

23,911

103,931

26,978

388,042

Average Gold Grade
(oz./ST)

0.002

-

0.513

-

0.474

0.570

0.380

0.645

0.123

0.002

-

0.530

-

0.436

0.602

0.450

0.129

Silver produced (oz.)

1,019,743

9,832,393

97,359

3,399,130

-

86,162

587,181

73,594

15,095,562

1,302,596

10,213,794

86,080

4,394,940

-

102,222

330,184

16,429,816

Average silver
Grade
(oz./ST)

18.50

16.79

0.34

3.23

-

0.74

17.5

4.83

6.61

18.80

16.93

0.30

3.96

-

0.81

5.90

6.88

Yanacocha's Properties

Operating Properties

For operating data (including ore mined, average gold grade of ore mined and gold production) for each of Yanacocha's operating properties and a description of how ore is processed and the source of electricity and water for each of Yanacocha's operating properties, see "-Yanacocha-Overview" and "-Description of Yanacocha's Operations".

Carachugo

Carachugo is a 90-hectare gold deposit with a leach pad that covers approximately 332 hectares. Carachugo, Yanacocha's first mine, commenced operations in August 1993. Mining is conducted by the open-pit method. Carachugo has one ore processing facility.

Maqui Maqui

Maqui Maqui is a 75-hectare gold deposit with a leach pad covering 67 hectares, located five kilometers northeast of the Carachugo pit. Mining operations at Maqui Maqui began in October 1994 and used the open-pit mining method. Although mining operations at Maqui Maqui ceased in September 2000, gold recovery from the leach pad continues.

San José

San José is a 100-hectare gold deposit, located one a halfand one-half kilometers southwest of the Carachugo pit, that shares the leach pad located at Carachugo. Mining operations at San José began in January 1996 and useduse the open-pit mining method. MiningAlthough mining operations at San José temporarily ceased in the last quarter of 2002.2002, in 2005 operations were initiated to complete the San José East deposit. Mining operations at San José West are scheduled to commence in 2010.

Cerro Yanacocha

Cerro Yanacocha is a 247-hectare gold deposit (ultimate pit) with a leach pad covering approximately 315 hectares. The Cerro Yanacocha pit is located two kilometers northwest of the Carachugo pit. Operations began in the fourth quarter of 1997 using the open-pit mining methodmethod. Cerro Yanacocha includes a carbon column facility and include a Merrill Crowe-type processing facility.

La Quinua

La Quinua is a 376-hectare gold deposit (ultimate pit) with a leach pad covering 336 hectares. The La Quinua pit is located three kilometers southwest of the Cerro Yanacocha pit. Operations began in the fourth quarter of 2001 using the open-pit mining method and all oremethod. All solution processing occurs at the Cerro Yanacocha plant following treatment at the La Quinua leach pad and carbon column facility.

The La Quinua mining operation includes Cerro Negro, a 15 hectare15-hectare gold deposit (ultimate pit) which is located six kilometers southwest of the La Quinua pit. Cerro Negro utilizes the La Quinua leach pad. Operations began in the second quarter of 2004 using the open-pit mining method and all oresolution processing occurs at the Cerro Yanacocha plant following treatment at the La Quinua leach pad and carbon column facility.

China Linda

In October 1999, the Companywe commenced lime production at the China Linda plant, which is located 12 kilometers to the northeast of the Yanacocha installations, in Cajamarca. Access to the plant from Yanacocha is by a ten kilometer private, unpaved road. The CompanyWe had 100 percent ownership of China Linda until December 19, 2000, at which date the plant became Yanacocha's property pursuant to the unitization of the Company'sour and Newmont Mining's properties in Northern Peru. In January 2002, Yanacocha took over the operation of the China Linda plant. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-History and Development". Lime is used in the gold and silver mining process to regulate the alkalinity of the cyanide solutions in the leaching process and for pH control in water treatment applications. Currently, the plant has a production capacity of 66,000 tons of lime per year. Additionally, construction gravel is obtained as a sub-product.

Reserves

Proven and probable reserves are based on extensive drilling, sampling, mine modeling and metallurgical testing from which economic feasibility is determined. Under the Management Contract, Newmont Mining, in conjunction with Yanacocha, calculates YanacochaYanacocha's reserves by methods generally applied within the mining industry and in accordance with the regulations of the Commission. Reserves represent estimated quantities of proven and probable ore that under present and anticipated conditions may be economically mined and processed.

The following table lists Yanacocha's proven and probable reserves and the average grade of ore as of December 31 for 20002001 through 2004.2005. The table also includes proven and probable reserves for the district of Yanacocha and Minas Congas,Conga, along with average grade of ore. Calculations with respect to the estimates of proven and probable reserves are based on a gold price of US$400 per ounce as of December 31, 2005, US$350 per ounce as of December 31, 2004 and US$325 per ounce as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and2001. Conga's copper reserves for 2005 were calculated at a price of US$3001.00 per ouncepound as of December 31, 2000. Minas Conga's copper reserves2005, and for 2004 were calculated at a price of $0.90US$0.90 per pound as of December 31, 2004. The2004.The district of Yanacocha's and Minas Conga's proven and probable reserves represent the total quantity of ore to be extracted from the deposits, allowing for mining efficiencies and ore dilution. Ounces of gold and pounds of copper in the district of Yanacocha's and Minas Conga's proven and probableprobab le reserves are calculated prior to any losses during metallurgical treatmen t.treatment.

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2004

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2003

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2002

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2005

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2004

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2003

Tonnage(1)

(thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade (oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Tonnage(1)  (thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade

(oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Tonnage(1)  (thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade

(oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Tonnage(1)

(thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade (oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Tonnage(1)  (thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade

(oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Tonnage(1)  (thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade

(oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Maqui Maqui----..

5,694

0.025

141

7,889

0.026

203

5,694

0.025

141

Quecher

-

-

-

1,128

0.037

43

-

-

- #9; -

-

-

-

-

1,128

0.037

43

Antonio

-

-

-

2,186

0.050

109

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2,186

0.050

109

Cerro Quilish

-

-

-

143,431

0.027

3,855

135,481

0.027

3,690

-

-

-

-

143,431

0.027

3,855

Cerro Negro

253

0.031

8

20,329

0.032

643

19,034

0.033

626

-

-

-

253

0.031

8

20,329

0.032

643

Carachugo

66,405

0.042

2,777

63,976

0.043

2,762

71,795

0.040

2,898

69,016

0.040

2,763

66,405

0.042

2,777

63,976

0.043

2,762

San José

10,818

0.020

213

9,475

0.021

198

6,054

0.022

131

7,334

0.021

153

10,818

0.020

213

9,475

0.021

198

Cerro Yanacocha

257,363

0.032

8,328

311,979

0.031

9,783

366,868

0.029

10,807

208,178

0.033

6,807

257,363

0.032

8,328

311,979

0.031

9,783

La Quinua

275,157

0.027

7,388

372,739

0.025

9,395

419,597

0.027

11,491

214,643

0.027

5,812

275,157

0.027

7,388

372,739

0.025

9,395

Corimayo

58,425

0.051

3,006

54,442

0.054

2,955

21,661

0.056

1,220

62,755

0.049

3,074

58,425

0.051

3,006

54,442

0.054

2,955

In process

60,860

0.028

1,685

67,363

0.029

1,966

58,682

0.030

1,742

71,108

0.028

1,968

60,860

0.028

1,685

67,363

0.029

1,966

Subtotal Yanacocha/avg

734,974

0.032

23,547

1,047,049

0.030

31,710

1,099,172

0.030

32,605

640,923

0.032

20,780

734,974

0.032

23,547

1,047,049

0.030

31,710

Subtotal Minas Conga/avg.

371,110

0.023

8,711

-

-

-

-

Subtotal Minas Conga/avg.*

617,787

0.019

11,836

371,110

0.023

8,711

-

-

Total/average

1,106,084

0.029

32,257

1,047,049

0.030

31,710

1,099,172

0.030

32,605

1,258,710

0.026

32,616

1,106,084

0.029

32,257

1,047,049

0.030

31,710

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2001

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2000

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2002

Proven and Probable

Reserves at

December 31, 2001

Tonnage(1)

(thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade

(oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Tonnage(1)

(thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade (oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Tonnage(1)

(thousands of

dry short tons)

Average

Gold Grade

(oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Average

Gold Grade

(oz./dry

short ton)

Ounces

Contained

(thousands

of ounces)

Cerro Quilish

-

-

-

-

-

135,481

0.027

3,690

-

-

-

Cerro Negro

137,736

0.027

3,700

118,888

0.027

3,251

19,034

0.033

626

137,736

0.027

3,700

Carachugo

19,494

0.032

631

23,976

0.028

682

71,795

0.040

2,898

19,494

0.032

631

Maqui Maqui

76,986

0.039

2,993

141,460

0.033

4,732

6,054

0.022

131

76,986

0.039

2,993

San José

6,484

0.021

139

7,589

0.025

192

366,868

0.029

10,807

6,484

0.021

139

Cerro Yanacocha

486,001

0.027

13,045

23,388

0.019

453

Cerro Yanacocha #9;

419,597

0.027

11,491

486,001

0.027

13,045

La Quinua

456,766

0.027

12,533

534,946

0.026

14,058

21,661

0.056

1,220

456,766

0.027

12,533

In process

-

-

455,522

0.026

12,039

58,682

0.030

1,742

-

-

-

Subtotal Yanacocha/avg

1,183,467

0.028

33,041

1,305,769

0.027

35,407

1,099,172

0.030

32,605

1,183,467

0.028

33,041

Subtotal Minas Conga /avg

-

-

-

-

-

Subtotal Minas Conga/avg

-

-

-

-

Total/avg

1,183,467

0.028

33,041

1,305,769

0.027

35,407

1,099,172

0.030

32,605

1,183,467

0.028

33,041

_____________________

  1. Calculated using a cut-off grade of not less than 0.010 ounce per dry short ton. Leach recoveries are estimated to be 60% to 83%, depending on each deposit's metallurgical properties.
  2. Minas Conga's proven and probably reserves for 2004 include 2,226 million pounds of 0.30 percent grade copper.

As of December 31, 2004, Yanacocha's proven and probable reserves (excluding Minas Conga's proven and probable reserves) were estimated to be 23.5 million ounces of gold, a 25.8 percent decrease from Yanacocha's proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2003, which were estimated to be 31.7 million ounces of gold. The decrease in reserves of gold was mainly due to the depletion of 3.9 million ounces of gold due to mining, the reclassification of 4.2 million ounces of gold reserves (3.9 million ounces from the Cerro Quilish deposit and 0.3 million ounces from the Cerro Negro deposit) as Mineralized Material not in Reserve ("NRM") and an increase of 1.6 million ounces of gold reserves, partially off-set by the depletion of 1.7 million ounces of gold reserves, due to an increases in the price of gold, increased costs, increased royalties for new pits and updated grade and recovery models. As of December 31, 2004,* Minas Conga's proven and probable reserves were estimated to be 8.7for 2005 include 3,226 million ounces of gold and 2.2 billion pounds of copper. Minas Conga reported no proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 2003. The increase in reserves of gold and copper was due to the reclassification of gold to NRM. Therefore, as of December 31, 2004, the district of Yanacocha's total proven and probable reserves (including Minas Conga) were estimated to be 32.3 million ounces of gold, representing a 1.7%0.261 percent increase over the district of Yanacocha's total proven and probable reserves, which were estimated to be 31.7 million ounces of gold as of December 31, 2003. The Yanacocha District's total proven and probable reserves of copper were 2.2 billion pounds as of December 31, 2004.grade copper.

As of December 31, 2004, Yanacocha's gold NRM was 5.9 million ounces, representing a 64 percent increase from Yanacocha's gold NRM of 3.6 million ounces as of December 31, 2003. Newmont Mining has not quoted silver reserves at Yanacocha for the last year due to recovery issues.

Based on the current recovery rate and estimated gold production levels in 2005, Yanacocha's proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 20042005 will be depleted by 2016 unless Yanacocha continues to add to its reserves. Yanacocha expects to add to its reserves by further exploration and development of its non-reserve mineralized material. Yanacocha's management believes that its prospective land positions and mining concessions provide it with potential for future exploration and growth in its non-reserve mineralized material and reserves. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Yanacocha-Exploration and Development Costs; Capital Expenditures".

ITEM 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

THE COMPANY

Introduction

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company Financial Statements as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Company Financial Statements are prepared and presented in accordance with Peruvian GAAP, which differ in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 3938 to the Company Financial Statements provides a description of the principal differences between Peruvian GAAP and U.S. GAAP, as such differences relate to the Company,us, and Note 4039 to the Company Financial Statements provides a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of the Company'sour net income for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and shareholders' equity as of December 31, 20032004 and 2004. The Company presents its2005. We present our financial statements in constant Nuevos Soles.

Operating Results

General

Overview. The Company wasWe were established in 1953 and isare one of Peru's leading producers of gold, silver and other metals. The Company'sOur consolidated financial statements comprise all theof our accounts and those of the Company and itsour subsidiaries, which include: (i) the Julcani, Uchucchacua and Orcopampa mining units; (ii) the Colquijirca, Antapite, Ishihuinca Shila and PaulaShila-Paula mines, which are owned through consolidated subsidiaries; (iii) Chaupiloma, which receives a royalty payment from Yanacocha; (iv) Condesa, which is mainly a holding company for investments in the Company,us, Yanacocha and other affiliated mining companies; (v)  Conenhua, which is mainly engaged in the transmission of electric power to Yanacocha and other mining companies; (vi) Cerro Verde, which is an equity investee engaged in the exploitation and (vi) severalcommercialization of copper; and (vii) other minor subsidiaries.

Yanacocha. A substantial part of the Company'sour net income before income tax was derived from itsour equity interest in Yanacocha. The Company hasWe have a 43.65 percent equity participation in Yanacocha through Condesa. The Company'sOur interest in Yanacocha's partnership's equity is accounted for under the equity method and is included under the caption "Investments" on the Company'sour consolidated balance sheets. According to International Accounting Standard 27, the Company makeswe make the appropriate adjustments to the Yanacocha Financial Statements prepared under Peruvian GAAP for like transactions and events in order to determine itsour equity share in Yanacocha.

Cerro Verde. We hold a direct interest in Cerro Verde. During 2005, we acquired an additional interest in Cerro Verde which allows us to exercise significant influence over this company. See Note 12(j) to the Financial Statements. As a result, we account for our investment in Cerro Verde using the equity method since this investment no longer meets the criteria to be recorded at its fair value. According to International Accounting Standard 27, we make the appropriate adjustments to the Cerro Verde financial statements prepared under Peruvian GAAP for like transactions and events in order to determine our equity share in Cerro Verde.

Results of operations. The primary factors affecting the Company'sour results of operations are (i) the amount of gold, silver, zinc and zinccopper produced and sold by the Company;us; (ii) prevailing world market prices for gold, silver, zinc and zinc;copper; (iii) commercial terms with respect to the sale of ore concentrates; (iv) the Company'sour operating expenses; and (v) the exchange rate between the Nuevo Sol and the U.S. Dollar, as theour revenues of the Company are almost entirely denominated in U.S. Dollars, while the Company'sour operating expenses are primarily denominated in Nuevos Soles.

Gold silver and zincsilver price hedging. The Company'sOur revenues and earnings are strongly influenced by world market prices for gold, silver, zinc and zinccopper that fluctuate widely and over which the Company haswe have no control. Depending upon the metal markets and other conditions, the Companywe may from time to time hedge itsour gold silver and zincsilver sales in order to decrease itsour exposure to fluctuations in the priceprices of these metals. Since 1998, the Company'sour hedging strategy has been focused on long-term position-taking on the price of precious metals. In October 2004, our Board of Directors issued a mandate not to enter into new hedging transactions.

The CompanyWe regularly examines itsexamine our strategy with regard to hedging. TheOur Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Commercial Deputy Manager of the Company coordinate the Company'sour day-to-day hedging activities according to a policy established with the Board of Directors. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk", "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Factors Relating to the Company-Hedging" and Note 3534 to the Company Financial Statements.

Operating costs and expenses. Operating costs and expenses consist of (i) operating costs, which are direct production costs, the major component of operating expenses; (ii) exploration and development costs in operational mining sites; (iii) depreciation and amortization expenses; (iv) exploration costs in non-operational mining areas; (v) general and administrative expenses, which principally consist of personnel expenses; (vi) royalties, which consist of payments to third parties and the Peruvian government to operate leased mining rights; and (vii) selling expenses, which principally consist of freight expenses; and (viii) assets impairment loss and write-off.expenses.

Inflation and devaluation of the Nuevo Sol. As theour revenues of the Company are almost entirely denominated in U.S. Dollars, a devaluation of the Nuevo Sol would result in an increase of the Company'sin our revenues when measured in Nuevos Soles. As theour operating expenses are primarily denominated in Nuevos Soles, high inflation rates would likely result in an increase of the Company'sin our costs when measured in Nuevos Soles. Therefore, when inflation in Peru is not off-set by a corresponding devaluation of the Nuevo Sol relative to the U.S. Dollar, the Company'sour financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected.

Until December 31, 2004, Peruvian GAAP required the restatement of assets and liabilities into constant Nuevos Soles as of the date of the latest consolidated balance sheet. Thus, holding of net monetary assets would result in a loss from exposure to inflation due to the decreased purchasing power of monetary assets in an inflationary environment (a gain in a deflationary environment). Conversely, a net monetary liability position would result in a gain from exposure to inflation (a loss in a deflationary environment). From 2000 to 2004, the Company held a net monetary liability position. In 2004, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board adopted Resolution No. 031-2004-EF/93.01, suspending the restatement of the financial statements to recognize the effect of inflation effective January 1, 2005. The Company's restated balances as of December 31, 2004 will be considered the initial balances as of January 1, 2005.

Although Peru's currency has remained stable against the U.S. Dollar since 2000, devaluation has occurred in the past. In periods of devaluation, holding a net monetary asset position in a foreign currency would result in an exchange gain (exchange loss in periods of revaluation), while holding a net monetary liability position in a foreign currency would result in an exchange loss (exchange gains in periods of revaluation). From 20002001 to 2004, the Company2003, we held a net monetary liability position.

The effect of inflation on the consolidated statements of income incorporates both (i) the loss or gain from exposure to inflation of the Company's net monetary position and (ii) the exchange gain or loss resulting from holding2004 to 2005, we held a net position in U.S. Dollars. In each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the effects from exposure to inflation of the Company's net monetary position were partially off-set by the exchange losses or gains resulting from translating the net U.S. Dollar liability or asset position into Nuevos Soles.

Effective January 1, 2005, the Company will have gains or losses depending on devaluation or revaluation of the Nuevo Sol versus the U.S. Dollar, and the Company's net monetary position in U.S. Dollars. See Notes 2(p) and 5 to the Company Financial Statements.position.

Until December 31, 2004, Peruvian GAAP required that financial statements be restated to reflect the effects of inflation or deflation. Consequently, financial data for all periods ended as of December 31, 2004 in the Company Financial Statements and throughout this document, except as otherwise noted, have been restated in constant Nuevos Soles as of December 31, 2004that date to reflect changes in the IPM as published by INEI. SeeAs indicated in Note 2(a) to the Company Financial Statements.Statements, the restatement of financial statements to recognize the effects of inflation has been suspended, effective January 1, 2005. The following table shows the main indicators of inflation and devaluation in Peru for the last five years:

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Inflation (%)

 

 

Consumer Price Index(1)

3.7

(0.1)

1.5

2.5

3.5

(0.1)

1.5

2.5

3.5

1.5

Wholesale Price Index(2)

3.8

(2.2)

1.7

2.0

4.9

(2.2)

1.7

2.0

4.9

3.6

Devaluation (%)(3)

 

 

Nuevo Sol vs. US$

0.5

(2.3)

2.0

(1.5)

(5.2)

(2.3)

2.0

(1.5)

(5.2)

(4.5)

___________

(1) Measures changes in the IPC as published by INEI from December of the previous year to December of the indicated year.

(2) Measures changes in the IPM as published by INEI from December of the previous year to December of the indicated year.

  1. As published by the SBS.

Effective January 1, 2005, we will only have gains or losses depending on devaluation or revaluation of the Nuevo Sol versus the U.S. Dollar, and on our net monetary position in U.S. Dollars. See Notes 2(o) and 5 to the Financial Statements.

Reserves. We utilize geological mapping, projection of ore-bearing structures, diamond drilling, core logging and chemical assaying, in addition to drifting along previously indicated mineralization, to replace and grow reserves. In addition, we use metallurgical test-work of core and bulk samples as a follow-up activity to prove the amenability of any previously indicated mineralization to certain methods available on site. We continuously analyze this information with respect to tonnage, precious-metals average grades, metallurgical recoveries and economic value and allocate funds preferentially to those projects that have the best potential to sustain or enhance profitable mine production in the near-term. Our mining operations are primarily conducted underground and consist of deposits that are difficult to explore and measure in advance of mining and in which the value or prospects for ore based on geologic evidence exceeds the value based on proved reserves throughout most of the life of mines supported by them, or extramensurate deposits.

In addition, underground mine infrastructure, such as declines, shafts and/or dewatering/ore haulage crosscuts, that facilitate access to ore reserves are constructed and categorized as mine development. We consider such underground mine infrastructure vital to assure sustainable mine production and reserve production. The design, construction and implementation of our underground mine infrastructure are presented and supervised by our Operations Manager with the Board of Directors' approval. We capitalize mine development and mineral land costs incurred after we have identified proven and probable reserves. Upon commencement of production, we amortize these costs over the expected life of the mining area, based on proven and probable reserves and other factors.

We believe that our replacement measures have been effective to increase reserves. Reserves at our Orcopampa mine, our principal gold mining operation, and the Antapite mine, our other significant gold mining operation, have increased steadily over the past five years. Reserves at the Orcopama mine increased from 195,163 ounces for the year ended December 31, 2001 to 773,306 ounces for the year ended December 31, 2004, and reserves at the Antapite mine increased, for the year ended December 31, 2001, when mining operations commenced, to 196,032 for the year ended December 31, 2005. Reserve and production levels at the Uchucchacua mine, our principal silver mining operation, have increased over the past five years, from 50,823,802 ounces for the year ended December 31, 2001 to 88,850,722 for the year ended December 31, 2005, with a majority of the reserve and production growth recorded from the year ended December 31, 2003 to the year ended December 31, 2004.

Our other mining operations are smaller and have variable fluctuations in production and reserves due to complexities of the ore located in certain mining operations (such as the Colquijirca mine); the sale of certain mining operations (such as the Huallanca mine); closures of mining operations (such as the Shila-Paula and Recuperada mines); and the production of silver only as by-product of gold (such as the Orcopampa, Antapite and Shila-Paula mines).

Net income and net distributable income. Under Peruvian law, each company is required to establish a legal reserve of at least 20 percent of its paid-in capital on an unconsolidated basis. An annual contribution of at least 10 percent of net income must be made until such legal reserve equals 20 percent of paid-in capital. The legal reserve may off-set losses or be capitalized. However, following any instance in which the reserve is used, Peruvian law calls for mandatory replenishment of the reserve.

Royalties. Royalty expenses consist mainly of payments made by the Companyus and Inminsur pursuant to leasinglease agreements relating to mining rights for the Orcopampa and Ishihuinca mines, respectively. Specifically, the Company payswe pay to the lessor a royalty of 10 percent of the value of the concentrates produced, and Inminsur pays a royalty of 7 percent of the price of the concentrates sold.

In addition, on June 24, 2004, the Peruvian Congress approved Law 28258 - Mining Royalties Law. This law established a mining royalty that owners of mining concessions must pay to the Peruvian government for the exploitation of metallic and non-metallic resources. The mining royalties are calculated on a sliding scale with rates ranging from 1 percent to 3 percent over the value of mineral concentrates based on international market prices. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Mining Royalties". The Company made its first payment of the mining royalty pursuant to Law 28258 in 2004.

Environmental protection laws and related regulations. The Company'sOur business is subject to Peruvian laws and regulations relating to the exploration and mining of mineral properties, as well as the possible effects of such activities upon the environment. The Company conducts itsWe conduct our operations substantially in accordance with such laws and regulations.

According to environmental regulations set forth by the MEM, the Companywe submitted EVAPs for itsour operating mines in 1995. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Environmental Matters". Based on the results of the EVAPs, Environmental Adaptation and Management Schedules, ("PAMAs")or PAMAs, were prepared and submitted to the MEM in 1996 and approved by the MEM in 1997.

Pursuant to the environmental regulations, mines were given a five or ten-year period to comply with the agreements reflected in each PAMA. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Environmental Matters". Upon completion of the project and agreement with regard to the financial investment, a final report of execution is submitted to the MEM and the MEM designates a group of independent companies, registered with MEM, to conduct an audit of each PAMA. Thereafter, the MEM issues a resolution recognizing compliance with the relevant mine's PAMA and completion of the adjustment process. Resolutions for each of the Company'sour mines were issued between November 2002 and April 2003 and have thereafter been inspection audits each semester. As of December 31, 2005, the activities defined in the PAMAs for the Uchucchacua, Julcani, Orcopampa, Colquijirca and Ishihuinca mining units had been completed.

Throughout this process, the Company haswe have been in substantial compliance with applicable maximum emission levels and other legal requirements. In addition, Law No. 28090 providing for the closing of mines was published on October 14, 2003. Pursuant to Law No. 28507, the Regulations to Law No. 28090 will be issued in a sixty-day term as of May 8,The corresponding ruling was approved on August 15, 2005. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Environmental Matters".

In 2002, 2003 andOn July 6, 2004, the CompanyPeruvian Congress enacted Law No. 28271Ley que Regula los Pasivos Ambientales de la Actividad Minera (Law that Regulates the Environmental Liabilities for the Mining Activity). This law regulates identification of potential environmental liabilities for mining activities and the means of remediating the affected areas. In order to comply with Law No. 28271, we are performing reviews in areas currently abandoned or inactive in which we previously carried out exploitation activities, in order to determine which remediation activities, if any, are necessary. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Regulatory Framework-Environmental Matters".

In 2003, 2004 and 2005, we spent approximately US$1.0,1.4, US$1.21.7 and US$1.42.0 million, respectively, in connection with environmental protection measures. The Company estimatesWe estimate that capital expenditures needed to comply with environmental regulations will be approximately US$1.3million3.0million in each of 20052006 and 2006.2007. This amount will be used on items such as new equipment and the construction of new processing plants and leaching fields, as well as the implementation of a program to minimize the environmental impact and improve the quality of mining residues. There are currently no legal or administrative proceedings against the Companyus for violation of environmental protection laws or other environmental regulations in Peru that could have a material adverse effect on the Company'sour financial position or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Estimates

What follows is a discussion of the Company'sour application of critical accounting policies that require our management, or the management of the Company (the "Management")Management, to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made, and where different estimates that Management reasonably could have used in the current period - or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period - would have a material impact on our financial statements. Management has identified the following accounting estimates as critical:

The CompanyWe also hashave certain accounting policies that it considerswe consider to be important, such as itsour policies for investments carried at fair value, recording stock appreciation rights, revenue recognition and exploration costs, that do not meet the definition of critical accounting estimates as they do not require Management to make estimates or judgments that are subjective or highly uncertain.

As indicated in "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects," we will adopt the provisions of IFRS 2 and SFAS No. 123R (Share-Based Payments) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective application. As of December 31, 2005, we applied the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Board Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations in accounting stock appreciation rights. Management believes that the adoption of IFRS 2 and SFAS No. 123R will not have a material impact on our Financial Statements and financial position.

Management has discussed the development and selection of the Company'sour critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company reviewsWe review and evaluatesevaluate the impairment of itsour long-lived assets if an event occurs that indicates that the book value of such assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss represents the amount by which the book value of an asset exceeds the higher of its net selling price or use value. The value-in-use of an asset is generally calculated as the present value of estimated future cash flows expected to be earned from continual use of the asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. An impairment loss recognized in a previous year may be adjusted if there is any indication that the estimates used when the impairment loss was recognized should be adjusted to reflect a more favorable cash flow scenario. Future cash flow assumptions include, but are not limited to, estimates of recoverable ounces and tons of ore and metal, prices (which include current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), production levels and capital costs, all based on mine plans. SuchSuc h future cash flow assumptions are valid when estimated but may change significantly when new information becomes available. Any difference between assumptions and actual market conditions could have an important effect on the Company'sour financial condition and results of the operations.

In 2004,2005, Management evaluated the impairment of the long-lived assets of the Ishihuinca and Shila gold mining units due to higher production costs and the depletion of their reserves. As a result of this evaluation, no impairment loss resulted. Management used future cash flow estimates to evaluate the impairment of long-lived assets for this year. These estimates incorporate the Company'sour own assumptions about the use of the assets, prices and exclude interest charges and income tax. Management believes such assumptions are reasonable in relation to the assumptions used by the Companyus in developing other information.

Management has conducted a sensibilitysensitivity test based on a one percent reduction of future cash flow estimates. Pursuant to this analysis, an impairment loss of approximately S/.0.5 million would result.

Useful life of property, plant and equipment

Depreciation is calculated under the straight-line method of accounting. The table set forth below reflects the estimated years of useful life for property, plant and equipment, based on current production levels and mining units:market prices:

Property, Plant and Equipment

Estimated Years of Useful Life

 

 

Buildings, constructions and other

10 to 20

Machinery and equipment

5 to 10

The Company's estimated years of useful life for its mining units, assuming current production levels and market prices, are as follows:

Mining units

Estimated Years of Useful Life

Uchucchacua

8

Orcopampa

6

Colquijirca

7

Antapite

10

Ishihuinca

4

Shila

4

Paula

4

Certain of the Company'sour depreciable assets, primarily buildings and constructions, have a useful life in excess of the current productive life of the mines because such assets may be transferred to another mine or converted to another usesuse when production at the mine where it is currently used ceases. In addition, the expected productive life of the mine is normally higher than the current life derived from the proven and probable reserves at year-end. Rather than exploring and developing long-term reserves, the Company focuseswe focus on sustaining current reserves.

The Company isWe are depreciating all the Colquijirca mining operation's assets (S/.55.7 million) for a period not exceeding the life of the mine, which is eight years. Management believes that all reserves for the Colquijirca mine will be fully depleted by 2010.2011.

Amortization of capitalized mining costs

The Company capitalizesWe capitalize mine developmentinfrastructure and mineral land costs incurred after Management has identified proven and probable reserves. Upon commencement of production, the Company amortizeswe amortize these costs over their expected lives, based on proven and probable reserves and other factors.

The process of estimating quantities of reserves is complex, requiring subjective decisions in the evaluation of all available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. The data for a given ore body may also change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, additional developmentexploration and construction activity, evolving production history and the continual reassessment of the viability of production under various economic conditions.

A material revision to existing reserve estimates could occur because of, among other things: revisions to geological data or assumptions; changes in assumed prices; and results of drilling and exploration activities. The Company makesWe make every effort to ensure that reported reserve estimates represent the most accurate assessment possible. However, because of the subjective decisions Management has to make, as well as variances in available data for each ore body, these estimates are generally uncertain.

Changes in reserve quantities, including changes resulting from gold, silver, zinc, lead and leadcopper price assumptions, would cause corresponding changes in amortization expense in periods subsequent to the revision, and could result in impairment of the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment and capitalized mining costs.

The Company estimatesWe estimate reserves assuming a US$350 per ounce gold price, a US$5.25 per6.30per ounce silver price, a US$1,050per1,085per metric ton zinc price and a US$550per793per metric ton lead price.

In addition to changes in gold, silver, zinc and lead prices, reserve quantities can also change for other reasons, including but not limited to, new drilling results, changes in production costs and changes in geological assumptions. The mines where amortization charges would be most significantly affected by changes in reserve estimates are Uchucchacua, Orcopampa, Colquijirca and Antapite. These mines generally have the largest amounts of property, plant and equipment subject to depreciation and the highest per ounce amortization charges.

Deferred stripping costs

The Company hasUntil December 31, 2004, in order to reasonably match revenues and current production costs, El Brocal deferred certain mining costs incurred in the expansion of the Tajo Norte area, which has an estimated life of eight years, to reasonably match revenues and production costs.mining site. These mining costs are commonly referred to as "deferred stripping" costs,stripping costs" and are incurred in mining activities that are associated with the removal of waste rock. The deferred accounting stripping method is generally accepted inrock to access the mining industry when mining operations have diverse grades and waste-to-ore ratios; however, some mining companies expense waste removal costs as incurred. If the Company were to expense stripping costs as incurred, there could be greater volatility in the Company's period-to-period results of operations. In order to calculate the amount of deferred stripping cost to record as normal period expense, the Company's management obtains a coefficient by dividing the estimated tons of waste material to move by the estimated tons of mineral to be extracted during the useful life of the rela ted area. The estimated coefficient is significantly affected by changes in geological assumptions. The actual coefficient was 8.94/1 in 2004 and 11.13/1 in 2003.ore body. Costs related to additional quantities of waste that must be moved to obtain 1 metric ton of mineral arewere deferred when the actual waste material extracted iswas higher than the estimate; likewise, these costs arewere amortized when actual waste mineral extraction iswas lower than the estimate. The amortization of the deferred stripping costs will be reflected in the consolidated statement of income over the life of the Tajo Norte area, based on proven and probable reserves, so that no unamortized balance remains when the mine is closed. Management expects to begin the amortization of the deferred stripping costs in 2006.

FASB unanimously ratified, at its meeting onIn March 30, 2005, the consensus reached at the March 17, 2003FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") meeting thatIssue No. 04-06 "Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry" (EITF 04-6). This addresses accounting for stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine areand refers to these costs as variable production costs that should be included as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs of sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory. As a result, capitalization of stripping costs is appropriate only to the extent product inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. EITF 04-6 is effective for the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. This standard may be applied either by the recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment in the period of the adoption or by restating prior period financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2005, El Brocal considers the deferred stripping costs incurred during the production stage as variable production costs that should be included in the costscost of the inventory produced during the periodinventories produced. This accounting change allowed El Brocal to adopt an accounting policy for deferred stripping that the stripping costs are incurred. This consensus, which is mandatory pursuant toconsistent and acceptable under both U.S. GAAP is effective January 1, 2006, with early adoption permitted. The effect of initially applying this consensus should be accounted for in a manner similar to a cumulative-effect adjustment. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-The Company-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Recent Accounting Pronouncements". The Company is evaluating the impact of this standard on the Company's financial position or results from operations.Peruvian GAAP.

Deferred income tax asset

Effective Income Tax Rate - 2005

Our income tax expense of S/.75.4 million in 2005 differed from our income tax expense of S/.102.0 million in 2004 mainly as a result of the following:

(a)Non-taxable income. According to current tax regulations, equity participation in affiliates, including the receipt of dividends, is not taxable (permanent item). In 2005, we reduced our theoretical income tax expense by S/.240.3 million compared to S/.158.9 million in 2004 due to our equity participation in investees.

(b)Non-deductible expenses. Pursuant to current tax regulations, the loss (negative fair value) on derivative instruments entered into with investment banks is not deductible to the extent it is generated abroad (permanent item). In 2005, we increased our theoretical income tax expense by S/.24.3 million compared to an increase of S/.16.2 million in 2004, due to the non-deductible expense originated by our derivative contracts.

(c)Change of tax status of derivative contracts. During 2005, we revised the terms of some of our derivative contracts to qualify them as sales contracts; pursuant to this revision, the related loss (negative fair value) became a temporary difference under current Peruvian tax regulations. Due to the change from a permanent to a temporary item, we reduced our theoretical income tax expense by S/.61.4 million. In 2004 no derivative contract was qualified as a normal sale contract.

Effective Income Tax Rate - 2004

The Company'sOur income tax expense of S/.102.0 million in 2004 differed from the Company'sour income tax benefit of S/.198.3 million in 2003 mainly as a result of the following:

(a)Non-taxable income. According to current tax regulations, equity participation in affiliates, including the receipt of dividends, areis not taxable (permanent item). In 2004, the Companywe reduced itsour theoretical income tax expense by S/.158.9 million compared to a S/.138.5 million reduction in 2003 due to itsour equity participation.

(b)Non-deductible expenses. Pursuant to current tax regulations, the loss (negative fair value) on derivative instruments entered into with investment banks is not deductible to the extent it is generated abroad (permanent item). In 2004, the Companywe increased itsour theoretical income tax basisexpense by S/.16.2 million compared to an increase of S/.55.3 million in 2003, due to the non-deductible expense originated by the Company'sour derivative contracts.

(c) Valuation Allowance.For each deferred tax asset, Management evaluates the likelihood that all or a portion of the asset will not be realized. This evaluation is based on, among other things, expected levels of future taxable income. If, based on the weight of available evidence, the Company determines that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized, the Company records a valuation allowance against it. In 2004, the Company reversed a valuation allowance of S/.4.6 million. In 2003, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of S/.2.6 million and reversed a valuation allowance of S/.43.5 million.

Effective Income Tax Rate - 2003

The Company's income tax benefit of S/.198.3 million in 2003 differed from the Company's income tax expense of S/.116.7 million in 2002 mainly as a result of the following:

(a)Non taxable income. In 2003, the Company reduced its income tax expense by S/.138.5 million compared to a S/.87.9 million reduction in 2002 due to its equity participation.

(b)Non-deductible expenses. In 2003, the Company increased its income tax basis by S/.55.3 million due to the non-deductible expense originated by the Company's derivative contracts. In 2002, there was no tax effect because, according to Peruvian GAAP at December 31, 2002, the Company did not account for the negative fair value of derivate instruments outstanding. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted IAS 39Recognition and Measurement, which requires the recognition of the fair value of the derivative instruments in the financial statements.

(c)Change of tax status of derivative contracts.contract As indicated above, the loss on derivative contracts are permanent items for income tax purposes.

. Effective January 1, 2003, the Companywe adopted IAS 39, recording the initial effect of the fair value of all derivative contracts in retained earnings (loss). In December 2003, the Companywe revised the terms of approximately two thirds of itssome derivative contracts to qualify them as sales contracts; pursuant to this revision, the related loss (negative fair value) became a temporary difference under current Peruvian tax regulations. The income tax effect on the loss recorded in retained earnings has been recorded as a S/.77.9 million benefit for the year because of the change of status offrom a permanent to a temporary item occurred in December 2003.

(d)Change in income tax rate. Effective January 1, 2004, the current income tax rate is 30 percent. Prior to December 31, 2003, such rate was 27 percent. In 2003, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of S/.16.6 million due to this modification. There was no effect in 2002.

(e) Valuation Allowance.For each deferred tax asset, Management evaluates the likelihood that all or a portion of the asset will not be realized. This evaluation is based on, among other things, expected levels of future taxable income. If, based on the weight of available evidence, the Company determineswe determine that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized, the Company recordswe record a valuation allowance against it. In 2004, we reversed a valuation allowance of S/.4.6 million. In 2003, the Companywe recorded a valuation allowance of S/.2.6 million for deferred tax assets. In addition, the Companyand reversed a valuation allowance of S/.43.5 million in 2003.million.

The need to record valuation allowances related to the Company'sour deferred tax assets depends on the following factors: the Company'sour (i) long-term estimate of future average realized metal prices, (ii) levels of production, (iii) proven and probable reserves, and (iv) the extent to which tax credits can yield a tax benefit in the future. Significant changes in these and other factors could have a material impact on the amount of valuation allowances recorded and on income tax expense.

Accrual for mine closing costs

Estimated future mine closing costs are based primarily on legal and regulatory requirements. Prior to December 31, 2002, the Companywe recorded closing costs at the end of a mine's life when such amount could be fairly estimated. As of January 1, 2003, the Company recordswe record closing costs when a legally enforceable obligation arises to close a mine. These futuremine arises. The accrual for mine closing costs are estimatedis based on studies completed by independent parties, in accordance with current environmental protection regulation.regulations. The accrual for mine closing costs corresponds mainly to activities that have to be completed for the restoration of the mining units and affected areas as a consequence of exploitation activities. The principal tasks that must be completed are land movements, reforestation labor and removal of the mining plants.

Upon recognition of a liability, recorded at fair value, related asset retirement costs should be capitalized and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset. This accounting treatment resulted in an increase of S/.3.5 million and of S/.5.1 million for net property, plant and equipment and developmentother infrastructure costs, respectively, recognition of an accrual for mine closing costs of S/.51.2 million; and recognition of a cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle that reduced net income and shareholders' equity by S/.72.3 million in 2003 (see Note 3(a) to the Company Financial Statements). The CompanyWe will incur additional depreciation expense over the estimated useful life of the asset and accretion expense to accrete the discounted value of the accrual.

Fair value of derivative instruments

The Company hasWe have futures and options derivative instruments as of December 31, 2004.2005. Fair value estimates are recognized on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 3534(a) to the Company Financial Statements. These estimates are made by independent parties pursuant to relevant market information, such as future prices of gold, silver and zinc, volatility factors, and interest rates. Changes in assumptions and market conditions could significantly affect these estimates.

The Company

(a)Outstanding derivative contracts

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company recognizeswe recognize derivative instruments as assets or liabilities, measured at their fair value, in itsour consolidated balance sheets pursuant to IAS 39, "Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement".

Management's intention is to use derivative instruments to hedge fluctuations in metal prices, mainly gold and silver, and not for trading purposes. However, the Company doeswe do not meet all the criteria established in IAS 39 to account for the derivative instruments as cash flow hedges. The criteria refer to formal documentation and testing of the effectiveness of the derivative instruments. Therefore, according to IAS 39, the Company haswe recorded a charge of S/.458.2 million to retained earnings in connection with the initial adoption of IAS 39 andin 2003. During 2005, we recorded a loss of S/.647.2 million due to the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments occurred during 2003. During 2004, the Company recorded a gain of S/.14.6.87.9 million due to changes in the fair value of derivative instruments.instruments compared to S/.58.8 million during 2004.

During the first quarter of 2006, our management completed modifications of the terms of all derivative contracts maintained as of December 31, 2005 in order to qualify them as normal sale contracts.

(b)Normal sale contracts

To minimize future fluctuations in the consolidated results of operations, during 2003 and 2005 we modified the Company entered into transactions that closed out approximately two thirdsterms of its outstandingcertain derivative contracts in December 2003.order to qualify them as normal sale contracts. These contracts were replaced with a series of sales contracts requiring physical delivery of gold over future periods that do not extend beyond 2011.October 2012. Under the terms of the contracts, the Companywe will realize capped prices ranging from US$332up to US$451 per ounce of gold. The fairAs of December 31, 2005, the settled value offor these contracts was S/.710.0.720.8 million was calculated immediately prior to their execution and recordedis presented as deferred revenue"deferred income from sale of future production" in the consolidated balance sheet for 2003.sheets. Such amountamounts will be included as revenue asupon the delivery occurs in 2004 through 2011. These contracts are accounted for as normal sales contracts.

As of December 31, 2004, deferred revenue from sale of future production is S/.643.7 million.the committed ounces.

(c)Reduction of derivative instruments portfolio

In addition to converting derivative instruments into normal sales contracts, in January 2004 the Companywe reduced itsour derivative instruments portfolio by 120,000 ounces of gold. This reduction resulted in a payment of S/.36.8 million.

(d)Settled derivative contract

Settled derivative contracts resulted in a loss of S/.73.4 million in 2004 compared with a loss of S/.20.8 million in 2003, reflected as "realized loss in derivative instruments"that was included in the consolidated statementscaption "Loss from change in the fair value of income.

Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A. ("El Brocal")

(a)Outstanding derivative contracts

El Brocal has entered into future contracts (zinc and silver) that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. Upon adopting IAS 39, El Brocal prepared formal documentation of its future contracts and tested their effectiveness. El Brocal has tested the effectiveness of such contracts on a quarterly basis thereafter to determine if they still qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. As of December 31, 2004, El Brocal has no derivative contracts: all derivative contracts were previously settled or replaced with a series of sales contracts requiring physical delivery in 2004 and 2005.

(b)Settled derivative contracts

Settled derivative contracts resulted in a loss of S/.21.1 million in 2004 compared with a gain of S/.5.4 million in 2003, reflected as "net sales"instruments" in the consolidated statements of income.

Contingencies

Contingent liabilities, when identified, are assessed as either remote, possible or probable. Contingent liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when it is probable that future events will confirm them and when their amount can be reasonably estimated. Contingent liabilities deemed as possible are only disclosed, together with a possible debit range, when determinable, in notes to the financial statements.

Contingent assets are not recognized in the financial statements; however, they may be disclosed in notes to the financial statements if it is probable that such contingent assets will be realized.

Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004

Net sales. Net sales increased 3.1 percent from S/.908.4 million in 2004 to S/.936.6 million in 2005 due to an increase in the price of silver, lead and zinc and an increase in the volume sold of silver during 2005, offset by a decrease in the price of gold for part of 2005. The following tables reflect the average realized price and volume sold of gold, silver, lead and zinc for 2004 and 2005:

Price

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2004

2005

Variation

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

US$/Oz

373.78

359.75

-3.8%

Silver

US$/Oz

6.51

7.38

13.4%

Lead

US$/MT

908.79

973.22

7.1%

Zinc

US$/MT

1,026.01

1,299.34

26.6%

Volume

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2004

2005

Variation

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

Oz

353,317

348,634

-1.3%

Silver

Oz

14,252,144

14,517,024

1.9%

Lead

MT

31,131

30,320

-2.6%

Zinc

MT

53,001

52,086

-1.7%

(i)Gold. The average sales price of gold decreased from US$373.78 per ounce in 2004 (certain sales contracts had fixed prices and others had spot prices) to US$359.75 per ounce in 2005 (sales contracts primarily had fixed prices). The volume of gold sold also experienced a slight decrease of 4,683 ounces of gold in 2005 compared to 2004, mainly due to a delay in shipments at year-end. The combined effect from the decrease in sales price and volume sold resulted in lower revenue from sales, which decreased by S/.35.8 million in 2005 compared to 2004.

(ii)Silver. The average sales price of silver increased from US$6.51 per ounce in 2004 to S$7.38 per ounce in 2005. The volume of sales increased by 264,880 ounces in 2005 compared to 2004 mainly due to increased production at the Uchucchacua mine as a result of new ore bodies discovered (Edith and Eva María) with higher silver grades. There was also increased silver production in the Colquijirca mine as a result of higher silver grades. The combined effect from the increase in sales price and volume sold resulted in a higher revenue from sales of S/.37.9 million in 2005 compared to 2004.

(iii)Lead. The average sales price of lead increased from US$908.79 per metric ton in 2004 to US$973.22 per metric ton in 2005. However, the total volume sold decreased by 811 metric tons in 2005 due to a slight decrease in the recovery rate of lead in the Colquijirca mine from 62.82 percent in 2004 to 60.0 percent in 2005. The combined effect of the increase in sales price and decrease in volume sold resulted in an increase of S/.1.0 million in 2005 compared to 2004.

(iv)Zinc.The average sales price of zinc increased from US$1,026.01 per metric ton in 2004 to US$1,299.34 per metric ton in 2005. However, the total volume sold decreased by 915 metric tons in 2005 due to the decrease in the average zinc grade from 1.48 percent in 2004 to 1.39 percent in 2005. The combined effect from the increase in sales price and decrease in volume sold resulted in increased revenues from sales resulted in a higher revenue from sales of S/.38.2 million in 2005 compared to 2004.

The revenues of gold, silver, lead and zinc mentioned above do not include the refinery charges and penalties incurred, which amounted to S/.176.4 million in 2005 compared to S/.162.1 million in 2004. This increase is explained by higher metric tones of concentrates sold in 2005 compared to 2004.

Realized income from sale of future production. To minimize future fluctuations in the consolidated results of operations, during 2005 and 2003, we modified the terms of certain derivative instruments contracts in order to qualify them as normal sale contracts. These contracts were replaced with a series of sales contracts requiring physical delivery of gold over future periods that do not extend beyond 2012. Under the terms of the contracts, our revenue will be capped between US$332 to US$451. The fair value of the replaced contracts, amounting to S/.172.5 million in 2005 and S/.710.0 million in 2004, were calculated immediately prior to the execution and recorded as deferred revenue in 2003 and 2005 and would be included as part of total revenues as delivery occurs until 2012. In 2005, we delivered 282,000 ounces of gold as part of the sales contracts mentioned above compared to 198,000 ounces of gold delivered in 2004. As a result, we recognized revenues of S/.92.7 million in 200 5 compared to S/.68.8 million in 2004.

Royalty income. Chaupiloma is the legal owner of the mineral rights on the mining concessions exploited by Yanacocha, and receives a 3 percent royalty on the net sales of Yanacocha. Royalty income increased 18.2 percent from S/.128.9 million in 2004 to S/.152.3 million in 2005, due to a 19.2 percent increase in Yanacocha's sales of gold from US$1,249.9 million in 2004 to US$1,490.4 million in 2005, partially off-set by the appreciation of the local currency during the first nine months of 2005.

Total costs of operation. Total costs of operation increased 8.9 percent from S/.542.2 million in 2004 to S/.590.6 million in 2005 due to the following:

(a) Operating costs, which include cost for labor (including contractor and personnel expenses), supplies and others, increased 1 percent from S/.340.7 million in 2004 to S/.343.3 million in 2005. Operating cost did not change significantly due to similar levels of production in 2005 compared to 2004.

(b) Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites increased 6.8 percent from S/.127.4 million in 2004 to S/.136.1 million in 2005, due principally to an increase of S/.16.4 million related to our exploration activities at our Orcopampa, Antapite and Shila-Paula mines, and an increase in amortization of development cost of S/.2.9 million. These increases were offset by a decrease of S/.8.6 million related to exploration activities at Uchucchacua, Ishihuinca and Paula mines.

(c) Depreciation and amortization costs increased 50.1 percent from S/.74.1 million in 2004 to S/.111.2 million in 2005, due mainly to additional depreciation expense which resulted from new estimates of the closing costs for the Colquirrumi mine, and full year depreciation expense for assets acquired during 2004.

Total operating expenses. Operating expenses increased 21.4 percent from S/.215.5 million in 2004 to S/.261.7 million in 2005, due to changes in the following components:

(a) Exploration costs in non-operational mining areas increased 4.2 percent from S/.88.2 million in 2004 to S/.91.9 million in 2005 due to higher expenditures in exploration areas, primarily in the La Zanja, Marcapunta and Poracota projects. In addition, together with our partners, we continue conducting exploration activities (mainly exploratory diamond drilling) in the Soras, Los Pircos, Pampa Andino and Trapiche prospects.

(b) General and administrative expenses increased 46.4 percent from S/.76.9 million in 2004 to S/.112.6 million in 2005. This increase was primarily due to a S/.24.8 million increase in long-term officers' compensation (stock appreciation rights) from S/.2.1 million in 2004 to S/.26.8 million in 2005, as a result of the increase in our stock price from S/.78.21 as of December 31, 2004 to S/.97.10 as of December 31, 2005.

(c) Royalty expenses increased 27.9 percent from S/.31.6 million in 2004 to S/.40.4 million in 2005, due to royalties paid to the Peruvian government in connection with the law on mining royalties in force in Peru effective July 2004. Royalties for the full year 2005 were S/.14.2 million (S/.6.6 million for six months in 2004).

(d) Selling expenses decreased 10.7 percent from S/.17.8 million in 2004 to S/.15.9 million in 2005, due primarily to lower freight transportation expenses of concentrates from S/.12.9 million in 2004 to S/.11.9 million in 2005 and the decrease of other related services from S/.4.9 million in 2004 to S/.3.9 million in 2005.

Operating income.As a result of the foregoing, operating income decreased 5.4percent from S/.348.5 millionin 2004 to S/.329.5 millionin 2005.

Share in affiliated companies. Income from share equity investment in affiliated companies increased 51.2 percent, from S/.575.9 million in 2004 to S/.870.7 million in 2005, and is primarily attributed to Yanacocha's higher profits, combined with our increased participation in Cerro Verde, as follows:

(a) Income from our interest in Yanacocha increased 29.5 percent, from S/.575.2 million in 2004 to S/.744.7 million in 2005 due mainly to (i) an increase in price per ounce realized on gold sales from US$411 per ounce in 2004 to US$448 per ounce in 2005, and (ii) an increase in volume of gold sold from 3.0 million ounces in 2004 to 3.3 million ounces in 2005, which were offset in part by an increase in the cash cost per ounce of gold sold from US$147 in 2004 to US$150 in 2005.

(b) Our interest in Cerro Verde increased from 9.17 percent in 2004 to 18.29 percent in 2005. This equity increase allows us to exercise significant influence on Cerro Verde and, accordingly, we have decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. In 2005, our interest in this investment amounted to S/.125.6 million. See Note 12(j) to the Financial Statements.

Loss from change in the fair value of derivative instruments increased 49.5 percent from S/.58.8 million in 2004 to S/.87.9 million in 2005. The increase in the fair value from derivative operations was due to a 9 percent increase in gold prices from US$411 as of December 31, 2004 to US$448 as of December 31, 2005.

Interest income.Interest income decreased 4.0percent fromS/.12.2 millionin 2004 toS/.11.6 millionin 2005 due to the reduction of income from investment funds. We maintained S/.52.8 million in investment funds as of December 31, 2005 compared to S/.86.9 million as of December 31, 2004.

Gain (loss) from exposure to inflation. Effective January 1, 2005, adjustment of financial statements for inflation was suspended pursuant to Resolution No.031-2004-EF/93.01. See Note 2(a) to the Financial Statements. As a result, we did not recognize any gain (loss) related to exposure to inflation during 2005.

Exchange difference gain (loss). Exchange difference gain (loss) increased from a loss of S/.12.6 million in 2004 to a gain of S/.1.5 million in 2005 as a result of higher exchange rates in 2005 applied to the assets and liabilities accounts. We held a foreign net monetary asset position during 2005. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements.

Workers' profit sharing expense. Workers' profit sharing expense decreased from S/.18.4 million in 2004 to S/.8.6 million in 2005. Workers' profit sharing expense is calculated applying a percentage to the taxable income. See "Critical Accounting Estimates-Deferred Income Tax Asset" under this Item 5 "Operating and Financial Review and Prospects".

Income tax expense. Income tax expense decreased from S/.102.0 million in 2004 to S/.75.4 million in 2005. See "Critical Accounting Estimates―Deferred Income Tax Asset" under this Item 5 "Operating and Financial Review and Prospects".

Minority interest. Minority interest expense increased 134 percent from S/.28.2 million in 2004 to S/.66.0 million in 2005, primarily due to higher profits from Inversiones Colquijirca S.A. and Chaupiloma.

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle due to stripping costs. In 2005, El Brocal charged extraction costs of S/.10.4 million related to the effects of the accounting change for stripping costs. See Note 3(b) to the Financial Statements.

Net income. As a result of the foregoing, net income increased 37.2 percent from S/.685.7 million in 2004 to S/.941.0 million in 2005. As a percentage of net sales, net income was 100.5 percent in 2005, compared with 75.5 percent in 2004.

Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

Net sales. Net sales increased 23.5 percent from S/.735.3 million in 2003 to S/.908.4 million in 2004 due to the following:

(a) An increase in the price and volume sold of gold, silver, lead and zinc during 2004. The following tables reflect the average realized price and volume sold of gold, silver, lead and zinc for 2003 and 2004:

Price

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2003

2004

Variation

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

US$/Oz

364.88

373.78

2.4%

Silver

US$/Oz

4.91

6.51

32.6%

Lead

US$/MT

532.04

908.79

70.8%

Zinc

US$/MT

814.37

1,026.01

25.9%

Volume

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2003

2004

Variation

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

Oz

323,801

353,317

9.1%

Silver

Oz

11,105,174

14,252,144

28.3%

Lead

MT

24,038

31,131

29.5%

Zinc

MT

50,933

53,001

4.00%

(i)Gold. The volume of gold sold increased 9.1 percent from 323,801 ounces in 2003 to 353,317 ounces in 2004, principally due to an increase in production at the Orcopampa and Antapite mines. Production at the Orcopampa mine increased as a result of intense exploration activities in the Nazareno and Prometida veins, and a considerable increase in the recovery of gold from 86.5%86.5 percent in 2003 to 93.7%93.7 percent in 2004.

(ii)Silver. Sales of silver increased 28.3 percent from 11,105,174 ounces in 2003 to 14,254,144 ounces in 2004 mainly due to increased production at the Uchucchacua mine as a result of further developmentexploration and exploitation of the Rosario ore body in the Carmen area and at the Magaly and Rossana ore bodies in the Socorro area. This increase was also attributed to the shipment of 672,156 ounces of silver that were delayed in 2003.

(b) The CompanyWe recognized a loss of S/.20.2 million in 2004 compared to a gain of S/.5.4 million in 2003, through Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A., on hedging transactions entered into with well-known investment banks.

Realized income from sale of future production. To minimize future fluctuations in the consolidated results of operations, the Companywe entered into transactions that closed out approximately two thirds of itsour outstanding derivative contracts in December 2003. These contracts were replaced with a series of sales contracts requiring physical delivery of gold over future periods that do not extend beyond 2011. Under the terms of the contracts, the Company'sour revenue will be capped between US$332 to US$451 per ounce. The fair value of these contracts, S/.710.0 million, was calculated immediately prior to their execution and recorded as deferred revenue in 2003 and will be included as part of total revenues as delivery occurs in 2004 through 2011. In 2004, the Companywe recognized revenues of S/.68.9 million related to ounces of gold delivered in connection with these contracts.

Royalty income. Royalty income increased 10.3 percent from S/.116.9 million in 2003 to S/.128.9 million in 2004 due to a 20.6 percent increase in Yanacocha's sales of gold from US$1,036 million in 2003 to US$1,250 million in 2004, which was partially off-set by the revaluation of the local currency.

Total costs of operation. Total costs of operation increased 10.918.7 percent from S/.437.4.456.8 million in 2003 to S/.524.7.542.2 million in 2004 due to the following:

(a) Operating costs, which include costs for labor (including contractor and personnel expenses), supplies and other, increased 11.711.1 percent from S/.302.6.306.6 million in 2003 to S/.338.0.340.7 million in 2004 as a result of the increase in gold production at the Antapite and Orcopampa mines and an increase in silver production at the Uchucchacua and Colquijirca mines.

(b) Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites increased 47.5 percent from S/.86.4 million in 2003 to S/.127.4 million in 2004 due principally to an increase of S/.15.2 million in exploration activities focused on seeking additional reserves at the Uchucchacua mine, and an increase of S/.15.0 million in amortization of development costs, which includes an additional amortization of S/.10.8 million due to the re-estimation of the mine closure liability at December 31, 2004.

(c) Depreciation and amortization costs increased 21.215.9 percent from S/.49.1.63.8 million in 2003 to S/.59.5.74.1 million in 2004 due mainly to the additional depreciation of equipment acquired in 2004 and full depreciation of assets acquired in 2003. In addition, depreciation and amortization costs increased due to a S/.5.6 million chargein charges as a result of the recognition of mine closure costs. See Note 3(a) to the Company Financial Statements.

(c) Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites increased 48.4 percent from S/.85.7 million in 2003 to S/.127.2 million in 2004 due principally to an increase of S/.15.2 million in exploration activities focused on seeking additional reserves at the Uchucchacua mine, and an increase of S/.15 million in amortization of development costs, which includes an additional amortization of S/.10.8 million due to the re-estimation of the mine closure liability at December 31, 2004. See Note 26 to the Company Financial Statements.

Total operating expenses. Operating expenses decreased 8.18.0 percent from S/.253.6.234.2 million in 2003 to S/.233.0.215.5 million in 2004, due to changes in the following components:

(a) Exploration costs in non-operational mining areas increased 48.7 percent from S/.59.3 million in 2003 to S/.88.2 million in 2004 due to higher expenditures in exploration areas, including 24,455 meters of exploratory diamond drilling, primarily in the La Zanja, Pampa Andino, JatunHatun Orcco, Arenizo, Poracota, Soras and Chilacocha projects. In addition, the Company, together with itsour joint venture partners, we conducted 11,619 meters of exploratory diamond drilling in the Aguas Verdes, Marcapunta, Incapacha and Minasnioc prospects.

(b) General and administrative expenses decreased 37.5 percent from S/.123.2 million in 2003 to S/.76.9 million in 2004 due mainly to the decrease of long-term officers' compensation (stock appreciation rights) from S/.49.6 million in 2003 to S/.2.1 million in 2004 as a result of the decrease of the Company'sin our stock price from S/.98.10 as of December 31, 2003 to S/.78.21 as of December 31, 2004. See Note 28 to the Company Financial Statements.

(c) Royalty expenses to third parties decreased 0.8and to the Peruvian Government increased 25.5 percent from S/.25.1 million in 2003 to S/.24.9.31.6 million in 2004 despite increased sales due to a modification of the Royalty Contract.2004. In 2004, the CompanyPeruvian government established a mining royalty that owners of mining concessions are required to pay for the exploitation of metallic and Sindicato Minero Orcopampa modified certain terms of the Royalty Contract to provide that Sindicato Minero Orcopampa will calculate royalty expenses pursuant to production value, which is based on net sales until December 31, 2003. See Note 37(b)non-metallic resources. Royalties paid to the Company Financial Statements.Peruvian government were S/.6.6 million in 2004.

(d) Selling expenses decreased 30.8 percent from S/.25.8 million in 2003 to S/.17.8 million in 2004 due to lower freight expenses of S/.12.9 million in 2004 compared to S/.18.4 million in 2003. The construction of a cyanidation circuit at the Orcopampa mining unit, that commenced operations in March 2004 with a utilization rate of 100 percent, permitted the Companyus to increase gold and silver recoveries, as well as to eliminate costs related to transportation of concentrates, since all gold and silver will be shipped as doré bars.

(e) Amortization of mining concessions and goodwill was S/.15.6 million in 2003 and 2004 due to similar production levels in the Colquijirca, El Brocal and Minera Paula mining units. See Note 16 to the Company Financial Statements.

(f) In 2004, the Peruvian government established a mining royalty that owners of mining concessions should pay for the exploitation of metallic and non-metallic resources. Royalties to the Peruvian government were paid S/.6.6 million in 2004. See Note 19(d) to the Company Financial Statements.

Operating income. As a result of the foregoing, operating income increased 116.2 percent from S/.161.2 million in 2003 to S/.348.4.348.5 million in 2004.

Share in affiliated companies. Income from share equity investment in affiliated companies increased 3.3 percent from S/.557.6 million in 2003 to S/.575.9 million in 2004, principally due to Yanacocha's increased net earnings. The Company's incomeIncome from itsour interest in Yanacocha increased 3.06 percent from S/.558.1 million in 2003 to S/.575.2 million in 2004 due mainly to (i) an increase in price per ounce realized on gold sales from US$363 per ounce in 2003 to US$411 per ounce in 2004, and (ii) an increase in volume of gold sold from 2.9 million in 2003 to 3.0 million ounces in 2004, which were off-set in part with an increase in cash cost per ounce from US$129 in 2003 to US$147 in 2004.

Gain (loss)Loss from change in the fair value of derivative instruments.Effective January 1, 2003, the Companywe adopted IAS 39 "Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement" which requires that derivatives instruments be measured at their fair value. See "-Critical Accounting Estimates" and Note 3534 to the Company Financial Statements.

Interest income. Interest income increased 55.1 percent from S/.7.8 million in 2003 to S/.12.1 million in 2004 due to increased income on investment funds of S/.3.2 million held in Compass Group. The CompanyWe maintained S/.86.9 million in investment funds as of December 31, 2004 compared to S/.54.9 million as of December 31, 2003.

Realized gain (loss) in derivative instruments. Realized loss in derivative instruments increased 252.9 percent from S/.20.8 million in 2003 to S/.73.4 million in 2004 due to the increase in the price of gold per ounce. The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge movement in the market prices of precious metals.

Gain (loss) from exposure to inflation. The gain (loss) from exposure to inflation decreased from a gain of S/.0.3.0.7 million in 2003 to a loss of S/.22.4.9.8 million in 2004 due mainly to (i) the revaluation of the local currency against the U.S. Dollar of 5.2 percent in 2004 (revaluation of 1.5 percent in 2003) and, (ii) the currency inflation of 4.9 percent in 2004 (2.0 percent in 2003). The CompanyWe held a net liability position in U.S. Dollars and in Nuevos Soles in 2004 and in 2003.

Exchange difference gain (loss). Exchange difference gain (loss) increased from a loss of S/.0.5 million in 2003 to a loss of S/.12.6 million in 2004 as a result of greater exchange rates in 2004 applied to the assets and liabilities accounts. We held a net monetary asset during 2004. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased 13.8 percent from S/.8.7 million in 2003 to S/.7.5 million in 2004 due mainly to the reduced indebtedness in 2004 compared to 2003. See Notes 17 and 20 to the Company Financial Statements.

Workers' profit sharing. Workers' profit sharing changed from income of S/.62.9 million in 2003 to an expense of S/.18.4 million in 2004. This amount is calculated applying a percentage to the taxable basis. See "Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Tax".

Income tax. Income tax changed from income of S/.198.3 million in 2003 to an expense of S/.102.0 million in 2004. See "Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Tax".

Minority interest. Minority interest expense decreased 44.7 percent from S/.51.0 million in 2003 to S/.28.2 million in 2004 due mainly to La Zanja's net loss in 2004. La Zanja is currently engaged in exploration activities and all exploration costs are charged to results of operations in the applicable year.

Net income. As a result of the foregoing, net income increased 291.4 percent from S/.175.2 million in 2003 to S/.685.7 million in 2004. As a percentage of net sales, net income was 75.5 percent in 2004, compared with 23.8 percent in 2003.

Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

Net sales. Net sales increased 27.72 percent from S/.575.7 million in 2002 to S/.735.3 million in 2003 due to the following:

(a) An increase in the price of gold, silver, lead and zinc and in the volume of gold sold during 2003. The following tables reflect the average realized price and volume sold of gold, silver, lead and zinc for 2002 and 2003:

Price

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2002

2003

Variation

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

US$/Oz

309.39

364.88

17.9%

Silver

US$/Oz

4.65

4.91

5.6%

Lead

US$/MT

444.84

532.04

19.6%

Zinc

US$/MT

778.56

814.37

4.6%

Volume

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2002

2003

Variation

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

Oz

247,010

323,801

31.0%

Silver

Oz

11,401,413

11,105,174

-2.6%

Lead

MT

23,081

24,038

4.1%

Zinc

MT

52,493

50,933

-2.9%

(i) The volume of gold sold increased 31.0 percent from 247,010 ounces in 2002 to 323,801 ounces in 2003, principally due to an increase in production at the Orcopampa and Antapite mines which reached 180,725 ounces and 84,261 ounces, respectively, in 2003 compared to 160,017 ounces and 72,742 ounces, respectively, in 2002. Production at Orcopampa increased as a result of the exploration activities and development in the Nazareno vein, where additional reserves were discovered, as well as the development of the Prometida, Prosperidad and Lucy Piso veins. Antapite's increased production is mainly due to plant and facility (cyanidation and oxygen plants) improvements.

(ii) Sales of silver decreased 2.6 percent from 11,401,413 ounces in 2002 to 11,105,174 ounces in 2003 mainly due to a delay in shipments at year-end which resulted in a decrease in sales of 672,156 ounces in 2003.

(b) The Company recognized a gain of S/.5.1 million in 2003 compared to S/.7.2 million in 2002, through Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A., on hedging transactions entered into with well-known investment banks.

Royalty income. Royalty income increased 41.9 percent from S/.82.4 million in 2002 to S/.116.9 million in 2003 due mainly to Yanacocha's increased sales of gold, which were US$714.8 million in 2002 compared to US$1,036.4 million in 2003.

Total costs of operation. Total costs of operation increased 10.9 percent from S/.394.5 million in 2002 to S/.437.4 million in 2003 due to the following:

(a) Operating costs, which include costs for labor (including contractor and personnel expenses), supplies and other, increased 10.6 percent from S/.273.7 million in 2002 to S/.302.6 million in 2003 as a result of the increase in gold production at the Antapite and Orcopampa mines.

(b) Depreciation and amortization costs increased 13.7 percent from S/.43.2 million in 2002 to S/.49.1 million in 2003 due mainly to the additional depreciation of equipment acquired in 2003 and full depreciation of assets acquired in 2002.

(c) Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites increased 10.3 percent from S/.77.7 million in 2002 to S/.85.7 million in 2003 due principally to an increase in exploration activities focused on seeking additional reserves at the Antapite (S/.3.6 million) and Orcopampa (S/.4.6 million) mines. As a result of these exploration activities, Antapite's and Orcopampa's reserves increased 19 percent and 77 percent, respectively.

Total operating expenses. Operating expenses increased 42.7 percent from S/.177.7 million in 2002 to S/.253.6 million in 2003, due to changes in the following components:

(a) General and administrative expenses increased 55.3 percent from S/.79.3 million in 2002 to S/.123.2 million in 2003 due mainly to the increase in long-term officers' compensation (stock appreciation rights) from S/.6.7 million in 2002 to S/.49.6 million in 2003, as explained in Note 28 to the Company Financial Statements.

(b) Exploration costs in non-operational mining areas increased 47.2 percent from S/.40.3 million in 2002 to S/.59.3 million in 2003 due to higher expenditures in exploration areas under joint operation, including drilling activities in the Huancavelica, La Zanja and Poracota projects. The La Zanja project is expected to start operations in 2005 and produce an average of 100,000 ounces per year.

(c) Royalty expenses increased 70.8 percent from S/.14.7 million in 2002 to S/.25.1 million in 2003 due mainly to increased sales of gold from the Orcopampa mine from S/.141.1 million in 2002 to S/.230.9 million in 2003.

(d) Selling expenses increased 6.2 percent from S/.24.3 million in 2002 to S/.25.8 million in 2003 due to higher freight expenses of S/.18.4 million in 2003 compared to S/.16.7 million in 2002 as a result of an increase in freight tariffs and in the volume sold of concentrates.

(e)Amortization of mining concessions and goodwill. Amortization of mining concessions and goodwill decreased 10.3 percent from S/.17.4 million in 2002 to S/.15.6 million in 2003 due to a decrease in the amortization of the mining concession of Inversiones Colquijirca S.A. by S/.1.4 million in 2003 as a result of the increase in proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 2003. See Note 16 to the Company Financial Statements.

(f) Assets impairment loss and write-off increased 193.8 percent from S/.1.6 million in 2002 to S/.4.7 million in 2003 mainly due to the write-off of idle assets of Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A. and Compañía Minera Colquirrumi S.A.

Operating income. As a result of the foregoing, operating income increased 87.8 percent from S/.85.8 million in 2002 to S/.161.1 million in 2003.

Share in affiliated companies. Income from share equity investment in affiliated companies increased 57.5 percent from S/.354.0 million in 2002 to S/.557.6 million in 2003, principally due to Yanacocha's increased net earnings. The Company's income from its interest in Yanacocha increased 57.7 percent from S/.353.8 million in 2002 to S/.558.1 million in 2003 due mainly to (i) an increase in price per ounce realized on gold sales from US$311 per ounce in 2002 to US$363 per ounce in 2003, (ii) an increase in volume of gold sold from 2,291,967 ounces in 2002 to 2,858,680 ounces in 2003, and (iii) a decrease in the cash cost per ounce from US$134 in 2002 to US$129 in 2003.

Gain (loss) from change in the fair value of derivative instruments.Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted IAS 39 "Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement" which requires that derivatives instruments be measured at their fair value. See "-Critical Accounting Estimates" and Note 35 to the Company Financial Statements.

Realized gain (loss) in derivative instruments. The Company recognized a loss of S/.20.8 million in 2003 compared to the gain of S/.44.8 million in 2002 on derivative contracts. The Company uses these contracts to hedge movement in the market prices of precious metals.

Gain (loss) from exposure to inflation. The gain (loss) from exposure to inflation increased 109.1 percent from a loss of S/.3.3 million in 2002 to a gain of S/.0.3 million in 2003 due mainly to (i) the revaluation of the local currency against the U.S. Dollar of 1.5 percent in 2003 (devaluation of 2.0 percent in 2002) and (ii) the currency inflation of 2.0 percent (1.7 percent in 2002). The Company held a net liability position in U.S. Dollars and in Nuevos Soles in 2003 and in 2002.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased 47.9 percent from S/.16.7 million in 2002 to S/.8.7 million in 2003 due mainly to the reduced indebtedness in 2003 compared to 2002. See Notes 17 and 20 to the Company Financial Statements.

Loss from sale of subsidiary's shares. On March 30, 2002, the Company sold its participation interest in Minera Huallanca S.A.C. (Huallanca) to BHL - Peru S.A.C for US$2.0 million. Of this amount, US$1.5 million will be paid in three equal semi-annual installments terminating on September 30, 2004 and the remaining US$0.5 million will be paid on September 30, 2006, provided that between September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2006: (i) the level of economic reserves allows Huallanca to produce 15,000 metric tons per month of mineral and (ii) the average price of zinc is higher than US$1,050 per metric ton in that period. If these conditions are not met, the final price of the transaction will be reduced to US$1.5 million. This transaction generated a loss amounting to S/.7.1 million assuming a sales price of US$1.5 million.

Other income and expense, net. Other income (expenses), net decreased 533.4 percent from an income of S/.3.0 million in 2002 to an expense of S/.12.8 million 2003 due mainly to an accretion expense of S/.4.7 million related to the accrual for mine closing costs and administrative penalties of S/.1.7 million.

Workers' profit sharing. Workers' profit sharing changed from an expense of S/.1.6 million in 2002 to income of S/.62.9 million in 2003. This amount is calculated applying a percentage to the taxable basis. See "-Critical Accounting Estimates".

Income tax. Income tax changed from an expense of S/.26.9 million in 2002 to income of S/.198.3 million in 2003. See "-Critical Accounting Estimates".

Minority interest. Minority interest expense increased 100.0 percent of S/.25.5 million in 2002 to S/.51.0 million in 2003 due mainly to (i) an increased expense in minority interest in S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca from S/.23 million in 2002 to S/.33.1 million in 2003 as a result of increased royalties from Yanacocha, and (ii) increased expenses in minority interest in Inversiones Colquijirca S.A. by S/.8.6 million and Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A. by S/.6.1 million due to a higher net income in these subsidiaries in 2003 compared to 2002.

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle due to mine closing costs.Effective January 1, 2003, the Company and Yanacocha, its affiliate, revised its accounting policy for the accrual for mine closing costs. The cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle, net of workers' profit sharing, income tax and minority interest, originated an expense of S/.72.3 million in 2003. See Note 3 to the Company Financial Statements.

Net income. As a result of the foregoing, net income decreased 57.8 percent from S/.415.7 million in 2002 to S/.175.1 million in 2003. As a percent of net sales, net income was 72.2 percent in 2002, compared with 23.8 percent in 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2004, the Company2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of S/.614.9.332.1 million, compared to S/.398.6.590.6 million at December 31, 2003.2004.

During May 2006, we purchased one million gold exchange traded funds (representing 100,000 gold ounces) at an average price of US$68.07.

Cash provided by operating activities

Netactivities.Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities were S/.680.1.563.0 million in 2005, S/.713.6 million in 2004 and S/.686.3.719.5 million in 20032003.

Cash provided by operating activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005 and S/.190.32004.The decrease in net cash flow provided by operating activities in 2005 compared with 2004 was mainly attributable to: (i) decreased collection of dividends primarily from Yanacocha (S/.419.8 million in 2002.2004 compared with S/.307.9 million in 2005), (ii) increased payments to suppliers and third parties (S/.355.2 million in 2004 compared with S/.365.4 million in 2005) as a result of an increase in the operating activities in the mining units, (iii) increased payments of exploration activities (S/.172.2 million in 2004 compared to S/.181.9 million in 2005) due to higher expenditures in exploration areas, primarily in the La Zanja, Marcapunta and Poracota projects, (iv) increased payments to employees (S/.119.6 million in 2004 compared to S/.147.0 million in 2005) due mainly to payments of S/.14.6 million related to the stock appreciation rights, (v) increased payments of income tax (S/.44.5 mi llion in 2004 compared with S/.84.8 million in 2005) as a result of increased earnings by us, Colquijirca and Chaupiloma, and (vi) increased payments of royalties (S/.27.2 million in 2004 compared with S/.42.8 million in 2005) as a result of increased royalty payments to the Peruvian government.

Cash provided by operating activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.The decreaseincrease in net cash flow provided by operating activities in 2004 compared with 2003 was mainly attributable to: (i) increased collectionrevenues from customers (S/.885.6 million in 2004 compared with S/.733.6 million in 2003), and (ii) increased royalties paid by Yanacocha (S/.120.1 million in 2004 compared with S/.112.4 million in 2003) in connection with an increase of Yanacocha's sales as a result of increases in price and volume of gold sold in 2004. These increased operating cash flows were more thanpartially off-set by (i) a decrease in the collection of dividends (S/.482.0 million in 2003 compared to S/.419.8 million in 2004), (ii) increased payments to suppliers and third parties (S/.347.1.313.8 million in 2003 compared to S/.388.7.355.2 million in 2004), as a result of the increase in the operating activities in the mining units, (iii) increased payments of exploration activities (S/.128.7 million in 200 32003 compared to S/.172.2 million in 2004) primarily from the Uchucchacua mine and exploratory diamond drilling in the Company'sour projects (La Zanja, Pampa Andino, JatunHatun Orco, Poracota, Soras) and joint venture projects (Aguas Verdes, Marcapunta, Incapacha and Minasnioc); and (iv) increased payments to employees (S/.101.6 million in 2003 compared to S/.119.6 million in 2004) as a result of the increase in gold production at the Antapite and Orcopampa mines and an increase in silver production at the Uchucchacua and Colquijirca mines.

Cash provided by operating activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.The increase in net cash flow provided by operating activities in 2003 compared with 2002 was mainly attributable to: (i) increased dividends and royalties paid by Yanacocha (S/.83.1 million and S/.80.6 million in 2002 compared to S/.482.0 million and S/.112.4 million in 2003, respectively) in connection with an increase of Yanacocha's sales as a result of the increase in price and volume of gold sold in 2003, and (ii) increased revenues from customers (S/.566.6 million in 2002 compared to S/.733.6 million in 2003). These increased operating cash flows were partially off-set by: (i) increased payments to suppliers and third parties (S/.289.8 million in 2002 compared to S/.347.1 million in 2003); (ii) increased payments of exploration activities, primarily from the Orcopampa and Antapite mines (S/.98.6 million in 2002 compared to S/.128.7 million in 2003; and (iii) increased payments of roya lties (S/.13.3 million in 2002 compared to S/.26.0 million in 2003) mainly to Sindicato Minero Orcompampa S.A. See Note 37(b) to the Company Financial Statements.

Cash used in investing activities

Netactivities.Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities were S/.597.4 million in 2005, S/.273.7 million in 2004 and S/.179.3 million in 2003.

Cash used in investing activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The increase in net cash flow used in investing activities in 2005 compared with 2004 was mainly attributable to: (i) payments of S/.52.3.509.2 million in 2002.connection with equity investments, mainly related to the acquisition of Cerro Verde's shares, compared to payments of S/.8.0 million in 2004 (see Note 12(j) to the Financial Statements) and (ii) a S/.19.0 million increase in development expenditures (S/.38.6 million in 2004 compared to S/.57.6 million in 2005) mainly related to stepped-up exploration activity at our Orcopampa, Antapite and Shila mines. These increases were offset by decreases of S/.24.5 million in time deposits and S/.38.9 million in the investment fund in 2005, compared with increases of S/.24.3 million and S/.34.8 million in 2004, respectively. In addition, payments from settled derivative instruments were reduced from S/.73.4 million in 2004 to S/.24.1 million in 2005, mainly due to the effect of the derivative contracts turned into normal sale contracts.

Cash used in investing activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The increase in net cash flow used in investing activities in 2004 compared with 2003 was mainly attributable to: (i) payments of S/.73.4 million in connection with derivative instruments settled in 2004 compared to payments of S/.20.8 million in 2003; (ii) a S/.24.3 million decrease in local currency time deposits; and (iii) an increase in acquisitions of property, plant and equipment (S/.67.8 million in 2003 compared to S/.96.5 million in 2004) related principally to the construction of tailing dams at the Orcopampa, Antapite and Colquijirca mines and a cyanidation plant at the Orcopampa mine. These increases in net cash outflowsflows were off-set by a reduction in outflow for the investment in 2004 of S/.34.7 million in a variable-fixed income fund compared to an investment of S/.53.1 million in 2003. See Note 7 to the Company Financial Statements.

Cash used in investing activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. The increase in net cash flow used in investing activities in 2003 compared with 2002 was mainly attributable to: (i) the investment in 2003 of S/.53.1 million in a variable-fixed income fund (see Note 7 to the Company Financial Statements); (ii) payments of S/.20.8 million in connection with derivatives instruments settled in 2003 compared to S/.44.8 million of proceeds recognized during 2002; and (iii) the increase in development expenditures (S/.24.0 million in 2002 compared to S/.38.5 million in 2003) related to the construction of the Patón tunnel in the Uchucchacua mining unit and the development of the "Rampa Mario" project in the Orcopampa mining unit which will allow a better access to the Prometida vein.

Cash used in financing activities

Netactivities.Net cash and cash equivalents used in financing activities were S/.214.3.224.1 million in 2005, S/.247.9 million in 2004 and S/.204.3.237.6 million in 20032003.

Cash used in financing activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005 and S/.133.42004. The decrease in net cash flow used in financing activities in 2005 compared with 2004 was mainly attributable to lower payments of long-term debt (S/.76.7 million in 2002.2004 compared with S/.50.3 million in 2005) and increased bank loans of S/.13.0 million, compared with payments of S/.10.3 million in 2004. This reduction of cash used in financing activities was mainly offset by increased payments of dividends (S/.152.0 million in 2005 compared to S/.139.5 million in 2004).

Cash used in financing activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The increase in net cash flow used in financing activities in 2004 compared with 2003 was mainly attributable to repayments of long-term debt payments of S/.76.7 million in 2004 compared to S/.22.2 million in 2003, see2003. See Note 20 to the Company Financial Statements. This increased cash used in financing activities was off-set by: (i) a decrease in net payments of bank loans from S/.22.9 million in 2003 to S/.10.3 million in 2004; (ii) a decrease in payments of dividends from S/.159.2 million in 2003 to S/.139.5 million in 2004; and (iii)(ii) long-term debt proceeds of S/.12.1 million. These proceeds were used to repay long-term debt with Banco de Crédito del Perú and Teck Cominco Metals Ltd., see Note 20 to the Company Financial Statements.

Cash used in financing activities for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. The increase in net cash flow used in financing activities in 2003 compared with 2002 was attributable to (i) increased payments of dividends of S/.72.3 million in 2002 compared to S/.159.2 million in 2003, and (ii) long-term debt payments of S/.12.1 million in 2002 compared to S/.22.2 million in 2003. The increase in net cash flow was off-set by a decrease in net payments of bank loans of S/.74.2 million in 2002 compared to S/.22.9 million in 2003, and the proceeds from the sale of treasury ADS of S/.25.9 million.

Exploration and Development Costs; Capital Expenditures

Total capital expenditures and exploration and development costs for 20052006 and 20062007 (excluding exploration and development costs at the Company'sour principal mines, which are included as part of their cost of production) are estimated to be approximately US$39.530.4 million and US$26.539.9 million, respectively. These budgeted expenditures include the following projects: the(i) construction, at an estimated cost of theUS$3.6 million, of a new cyanidation plant at Uchucchacua drillingto treat oxide ore; (ii) deepening of the master shaft at increased depthsthe Carmen and Socorro mines, at Orcopampaan expected cost of US$10.6 million; (iii) extension of the Nazareno and generalPrometida ramps and the construction of an auxiliary shaft to improve ventilation and ore transport at Orcopampa; and (iv) various other exploration projects. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-History and Development-CapitalCompany-History-Capital Expenditures". Exploration and development costs at locations other than the Company'sour principal mines are estimated to be approximately US$16.522.0 million in 20052006 and US$16.528.0 million in 2006.2007. Exploration and development costs, includingi ncluding such costs at the Company'sour principal mines are estimated to be approximately US$38.733.9 million. These exploration and development costs include all of the costs associated with exploration activities such as drilling, equipment and geological and metallurgical testing. Exploration and development expenditures for 20052006 and 20062007 relate primarily to the developmentfurther evaluation of the following mining units and projects: La Zanja, Tantahuatay, Huancavelica, Poracota, Los Pircos, Pampa Andino, Trapiche, Santa Marina, Minasnioc, CofradiaEl Faique and others. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Business Overview-Exploration".

The CompanyWe undertook in EVAPs filed with the Peruvian government in March 1995 to make capital expenditures in respect of environmental projects. In 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004, the Company2005, we incurred capital expenditures in connection with these environmental projects of approximately US$1.1, US$1.2 andmillion, US$1.4 million and US$2.0 million, respectively. The Company expectsWe expect to incur approximately US$2.8 million in 2006 and US$3.0 million in 2007 in capital expenditures in respect ofrelating to environmental projects of approximately US$1.3 million in each of 2005 and 2006. The Company'sprojects. Our capital spending plans under the PAMAs were approved by the Peruvian government. The development of more stringent environmental protection programs in Peru could impose additional costs and other constraints on the Company'sour operations. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-Business Overview-Regulatory Framework-Environmental Matters".

The Company expectsWe expect that itwe will meet itsour working capital, capital expenditure and exploration and development expense requirements for the next several years from internally generated funds, cash on hand and dividends received from itsour investments in non-consolidated mining operations, including Yanacocha. Additional financing, if necessary for the developmentconstruction of any project, is expected to be obtained from borrowings under bank loans and the issuance of debt securities. There can be no assurance, however, that sufficient funding will be available to the Companyus from the internal or external sources to finance any future capital expenditure program, or that external funding will be available to the Companyus for such purpose on terms or at prices favorable to the Company.us. A very significant decline in the prices of gold and silver would be reasonably likely to affect the availability of such sources of liquidity. In addition, if the Company fundswe fund future capital expenditures from internal ca shcash flow, there may be less funds available for the payment of dividends.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (U.S. GAAP/Peruvian GAAP)

FASBunanimouslyStock Based Compensation

In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment", or SFAS No.l 123R which revised SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and amends SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS No. 123R requires measurement and recording to the financial statements of the costs of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award, recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for such award. We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R as of January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective application. Accordingly, compensation expense will be recognized for all newly granted awards and awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after January 1, 2006. Additionally, SFAS No. 123R requires the benefits of tax deductions from recognized compensation expenses to be reported as financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as currently required. We currently apply the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Board Opinion No. 25―"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations in accounting for stock options. Accordingly, because stock option exercise prices equal the market value on the date of the grant, no compensation cost is currently recognized for stock option grants. The adoption of SFAS 123R did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Deferred Stripping Costs

In March 2005, FASB ratified at its meeting on March 30, 2005,Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-06, "Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the consensus reached at the March 17, 2003Mining Industry," or EITFmeeting that 04-6. This addresses accounting for stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine areand refers to these costs as variable production costs that should be included in the costs of the inventory produced during the period that the stripping costs are incurred. The EITF determined that post-production strippingcosts are a component of mineral inventory costs, which are subject to the provisions of AICPA Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43,Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins,Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing"(ARB43). In the mining industry, the costs of removing overburden and waste materials to access mineral deposits are referred to as "stripping costs." In addition, the EITF held that post-production stripping costs should be considered costs of extracted minerals and recognized as a component of inventory to be recog nizedrecognized in costs ofapplicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of the inventory. Additionally,As a result, capitalization of suchstripping costs would beis appropriate only to the extent product inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. This consensus, which is mandatory pursuant to U.S. GAAP,EITF 04-6 is effective January 1, 2006, with earlyfor the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted by this standard and the guidance may representbe applied either by the recognition of a significant changecumulative effect adjustment in practice for those companies that currently expense post-production stripping costs as incurred or capitalize post-production stripping costs and amortize those deferred costs over the lifeperiod of the mineadoption or another determinative period. The effect of initially applying this consensus should be accounted for in a manner similar to a cumulative-effect adjustment. Upon adoption, an entity should recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying this consensus consistent with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20,Accounting Changes.However, pro forma information will not be required upon adoption. Alterna tively, companies are not prohibited fromby restating prior period financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2005, El Brocal considers the deferred stripping costs incurred during the production stage as variable production costs that should be included in the cost of inventories produced. The cumulative effect of this accounting change, net of workers' profit sharing, income tax and minority interest, was a loss of S/.10,416,000, which is separately presented in the caption "Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles due to stripping costs" in the consolidated statements issued. Entitiesof income. This accounting change had no effect in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 due to the fact that elect early adoptionthe stripping costs incurred in such period were treated as part of the guidance in this consensus for an interim period must report the effectscost of inventories produced. In 2003, this change would have represented an increase in interim financialthe consolidated statements of income in accordance withoperating costs from S/.456,764,000 to S/.471,093,000 and a decrease in the provisionsnet income from S/.175,153,000 to S/.172,490,000. In addition, the basic and d iluted earnings per share would have decreased from S/.1.38 per share to S/.1.36 per share. Adoption of FASBStatement No. 3,Reporting Accounting changes in Interim Financial Statements. The Company is evaluating the impact of this standard on the Company's financial position or results from operations.new guidelines has not impacted our cash position.

Asset Retirement Obligations

In March 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation N.47 ("47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations" or FIN 47")47, an interpretation of FASB StatementNo. 143. FIN 47 clarifies that the term "conditional asset retirement obligation" as used in SFAS No. 143Asset Retirement Obligations, which was issued in June 2001. FASB issued the Interpretation refers to address diverse accounting practices that have developed with regarda legal obligation to the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with theperform an asset retirement of a tangible long-lived assetactivity in which the timing and (or)and/or method of settlement are conditionalconditioned on a future event that may or may not be within the control onof the entity. AccordingThe obligation to perform the Interpretation,asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or)and/or method of settlement of a condition asset retirement obligations should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists.settlement. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient informationrequires a liability to reasonably estimatebe recognized for the fair value of ana conditional asset retirement obligation.obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end offor fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Accounting Changes and Error Corrections

In May 2005, (December 31, 2005, fthe FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections", or calendar year-end companies). RetrospectiveSFAS No. 154. SFAS No. 154 established new standards in accounting for changes in accounting principles. SFAS No. 154 requires all such changes to be accounted for by retrospective application to the financial statements of interim financial informationprior periods unless otherwise specified by the literature, unless it is permitted, butimpracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Adoption of SFAS No. 154 is not required. Early adoption of this Interpretation is encouraged. The Company is evaluating theexpected to have a material impact of this standard on the Company'sour financial position, results of operations or results from operations.cash flows.

See Note 2(v) to our Financial Statements for recent pronouncements under Peruvian GAAP.

YANACOCHA

YANACOCHA

Introduction

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Yanacocha Financial Statements as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Yanacocha Financial Statements are prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Note 17 to the Yanacocha Financial Statements provides a description of the principal differences between U.S. GAAP and Peruvian GAAP, as such differences relate to Yanacocha, and provides a reconciliation to Peruvian GAAP of Yanacocha's net income for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and partners' equity as of December 31, 20032004 and 2004.2005. Yanacocha presents its financial statements in U.S. Dollars.

Operating Results

Overview

Yanacocha, the largest gold producer in Latin America, was established in Peru in January 1992, and commenced production activities in August 1993. Yanacocha's operations are located in the Andes mountains in Northern Peru, in the area of Cajamarca which is located approximately 600900 kilometers north of Lima and 45 kilometers north of the City of Cajamarca, at an altitude of 4,000 meters above sea level.

The primary factors affecting Yanacocha's results of operations are (i) prevailing world market prices for gold, (ii) the amount of gold produced and sold by Yanacocha and (iii) Yanacocha's cash costs.

Yanacocha's exploration activities encompass 176,408 hectares of land. Chaupiloma holds the mining rights with respect to these hectares and has assigned the mining rights relating to 108,089 hectares to Yanacocha, covered by 183 mining concessions and four provisional permits. Although Chaupiloma has not assigned to Yanacocha the mining rights to the remaining hectares, Chaupiloma permits Yanacocha to explore these hectares. Of the 183 mining concessions assigned to Yanacocha, approximately 17 are currently used in mining operations and the remaining mining concessions are being explored by Yanacocha. Yanacocha has acquired all the surface rights with respect to 15,230 hectares of the surface land covering its Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, San José, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua (which includes the Cerro Negro deposit) mining operations and a majority of the Cerro Quilish deposit. In addition, Yanacocha has acquired 4,522 hectares of surface rights with respect to the Minas Conga deposit .

Yanacocha is owned 51.35 percent owned by Newmont Mining, through its wholly owned subsidiary Newmont Second, 43.65 percent by the Companyus through itsour 100 percent owned subsidiary Condesa, and 5 percent by IFC. Yanacocha is managed by Newmont Peru Limited Sucursal del Peru ("Newmont Peru").S.R.L. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Management of Yanacocha-General Manager/Management Agreement". Since 1992, aggregate capital contributions of US$2.3 million have been made by Condesa, Newmont Second and IFC to Yanacocha. Although Yanacocha did not pay dividends during its development years, 1992 through 1994, cash dividends were distributed from 1995 to 1999. In 2000, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$60 million in dividends in respect of 2000 earnings and increased its property, plant and equipment reinvestment program by US$71 million. The reinvestment program totaled US$193 million at December 31, 2000, which amount was capitalized during 2001. In 2001, Yanacocha paid an aggre gate amount of US$10 million in dividends in respect of 2000 earnings and elected to reinvest US$80 million from 2001 profits based on a new reinvestment program for the years 2001 to 2004. In December 2001, the MEM approved the 1998 reinvestment program (increased in 1999) for US$206.5 million. As a result, an additional US$13.5 million was capitalized. In 2002, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$50.7 million in dividends in respect of 2001 earnings and elected to reinvest US$80 million from 2002 profits. In 2003, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$300 million in dividends in respect of 2002 earnings and elected to reinvest US$29.6 million from 2003 profits. See the Statements of Changes in Partners Equity in the Yanacocha Financial Statements on page F-70. In 2004, Yanacocha paid an aggregate amount of US$280 million in dividends in respect of 2003 earnings and completed all of investments under its reinvestment program from 2000-2004. Undistributed earnings associated with the reinvestment pro gram are presented as restricted earnings as of December 2002, 2003 and 2004. See the Statements of Changes in Partners Equity in the Yanacocha Financial Statements on page F-70 and "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Overview".

On October 31, 1999, pursuant to a public deed, Yanacocha changed its legal structure from a corporation to a partnership, changing its name from "Minera Yanacocha S.A." to "Minera Yanacocha S.R.L." As a result, Yanacocha (i) cannot have more than 20 partners; (ii) its capital stock is represented in participations; (iii) is not required to maintain a legal reserve (see Note 11 to Yanacocha Financial Statements); and (iv) will not receive a different income tax treatment under Peruvian law than it did as a corporation.

The table below highlights key financial and operating results:

Summary of Financial and Operating Performance

Year Ending December 31,

200520042003

Gold prices. Yanacocha's revenuesSales (US$000) 1,490,402 1,249,882 1,036,370

Gold ounces sold 3,327,515 3,039,873 2,858,680

Average gold price received (US$/oz) 448 411 363

Costs applicable to sales (US$/oz) 152.6 148.3 132.0

Net income (US$000) 525,474 390,304 320,412

Dividends Paid (US$000) 180,000 280,000 300,000

Gold sales.

Gold sales increased 19 percent from 2004 to 2005, due principally to an increase of 10 percent in production and earnings are strongly influenced by world market pricesan increase of 9 percent in the price per ounce of gold. The average price per ounce of gold increased from US$411 in 2004 to US$448 in 2005, which resulted in a total sales increase of approximately US$240.5 million for gold. Such prices have historically fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors.the year. Increased production resulted in a 9 percent increase in the quantity of gold sold, from 3,039,873 ounces in 2004 to 3,327,515 ounces in 2005. Yanacocha has not engaged in gold price hedging activities, such as forward sales or option contracts, to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in the price of gold.

CostCosts applicable to sales.Costsales.

Costs applicable to sales increased 13 percent from 2004 to 2005, due primarily to higher operating costs mainly attributed to the increase in cost of diesel, consumption of cyanide and personnel costs, as well as increased royalties and workers profit participation expenses, partially off-set by higher silver by-product credits. Costs applicable to sales include: (i) operating costs, consisting primarily of direct production costs such as mining and treatment of the ore, which are the most significant components of cost applicable to sales, (ii) employee profit sharing of 8 percent of pre-tax profits calculated in accordance with Peruvian generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, (iii) royalties of 3 percent of the quarterly net sale value of all gold and silver extracted from the mining concessions payable to Chaupiloma after deducting refinery and transport costs, (iv) management fees payable to Newmont Peru, the operator of Yanacocha, (v) selling expenses and (vi) other costs.

Income tax.The uniform incometax.

In addition, Yanacocha's financial and operating results were impacted by a tax rateexpense of US$235.4 million, compared to US$181.6 million in Peru was 27 percent2004, reflecting its increased profitability.

Dividends.

As of Peruvian taxable income until December 31, 2003. Effective January 1, 2004,2005, Yanacocha has paid cumulative dividends of US$1,288.2 million to partners and has reserved US$396.1 million for two reinvestment programs.

Forward looking.

Certain key factors will affect Yanacocha's future financial and operating results. These include, but are not limited to the income tax rate in Peru is 30 percent of taxable income (Yanacocha, as explained below, has a stabilized corporate tax rate of 30 percent, excluding income from the La Quinua mine which had a tax rate of 27 percent until December 31, 2003 and 29 percent as of January 1, 2004) and for financial statement purposes is calculated for Yanacocha in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Pursuant to Supreme Decree No.027-98-EF, mining companies can obtain a tax benefitfollowing:

Fluctuations in the formgold price.

Yanacocha expects 2006 gold sales to be 2.6 million ounces at costs applicable to sales per ounce of an investment credit,approximately US$194 per ounce. Sales from 2007 through 2010 are expected to average approximately 1.75 million ounces at costs applicable to sales of approximately US$255 per ounce, with actual gold sales and costs being determined by, effectively reinvesting non-distributed earnings into capital expansion projects that increaseamong other factors, further mine plan optimization efforts, the company's productivity. This investment credit is based on 80 percentdiscovery and development of amounts reinvestedadditional oxide deposits, and is obtained by applicationthe development of Conga, currently scheduled to and approval by the Ministry of Energy and Mines.

Yanacocha has entered into Mining Law Stabilization Agreements under the General Mining Law with the Peruvian government. A Mining Law Stabilization Agreement is a standardized agreement prepared by the MEM, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, the Central Bank and other Peruvian governmental ministries. Such agreements (i) provide stabilized corporate tax rates, (ii) grant the ability to obtain VAT credit, (iii) provide full access to foreign currency and guarantee treatmentcommence production in all foreign exchange matters as is given to Peruvian nationals, (iv) protect against foreign exchange controls and (v) grant the right to freely dispose of and export mineral products. Yanacocha has entered into such agreements with regard to the following mines: Carachugo/San Jose, Maqui Maqui, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua. Pursuant to these agreements, the income tax rate in Peru is 30 percent of taxable income, excluding income from the La Quinua mine which had a tax rate of 27 percent until December 31, 2 003 and 29 percent as of January 1, 2004.2010.

Critical Accounting Policies

Yanacocha has furnished the Companyus with a discussion of Yanacocha'sits critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of its financial statements. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties and could potentially impact results under different assumptions and conditions. Note 2 to the Yanacocha Financial Statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of Yanacocha's Financial Statements. The following is a brief discussion of the identified critical accounting policies and the estimates and judgments made by Yanacocha.

Stockpiles, Ore on Leach Pads and Inventories

As described below, costs that are incurred in, or that benefit, the productive process are accumulated as stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories. Stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories are carried at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on prevailing and long-term metals prices, less the estimated costs to complete production and sell the product. Write-downs of stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories resulting from net realizable value impairments are reported as a component of costs applicable to sales. The current portion of stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories is determined based on the expected amounts to be processed within the next twelve months. Stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories not expected to be processed within the next twelve months are classified as long-term. The major classifications are as follows:

Stockpiles.

Stockpiles represent coarse ore that has been extracted from a minemined and is available for further processing. Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tons added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained units such as contained ounces or pounds (based on assay data) and the estimated metallurgical recovery percentagerates (based on the expected processing method). Stockpile ore tonnage istonnages are verified by periodic surveys. Costs are allocated to a stockpile based on the relative valuevalues of material stockpiled and processed using current mining costs incurred up to the point of stockpiling the ore, including applicable overhead, depreciation, depletion and amortization relating to mining operations, and removed at each stockpile's average cost per recoverable unit.

Ore on Leach Pads.ThePads.

The recovery of gold from certain oxide ores is efficiently achieved through the heap leaching process.leaching. Under this method, ore is placed on leach pads where it is permeatedtreated with a chemical solution, which dissolves the gold contained in the ore. The resulting "pregnant" solution which is included as in-process inventory, isfurther processed further in the processinga plant where the gold is recovered. For accounting purposes, costs are added to ore on leach pads based on current mining costs, including applicable depreciation, depletion and amortization relating to mining operations. CostCosts are removed from theore on leach padpads as ounces are recovered in circuit at the leach plant based on the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad.

The engineering estimates of recoverable gold on the leach pads are calculated from the quantities of ore placed on the pads (measured tons added to the leach pads), the grade of ore placed on the leach pads (based on assay data) and a recovery percentage (based on the leach process and ore type). In general, the leach pad production cycles project recoveries ofpads recover approximately 90 percent to 95 percent of the placedultimate recoverable ounces in the first year of leaching, declining each year thereafter until the leaching process is complete.

Although the quantities of recoverable gold placed on the leach pads are reconciled by comparing the grades of ore placed on the leach pads to the quantities of gold actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing process is constantly monitored and the engineering estimates are refined based on actual results over time. Historically, Yanacocha's operating results have not been materially impacted by variations between the estimated and actual recoverable quantities of gold on its leach pads. At December 31, 2004,2005, the weighted-average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on leach pads was US$151140 per ounce.ounce (unaudited). Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis.

The ultimate recovery of gold from a leach pad will not be known until the leaching process is concluded. Based on current mine plans excluding any Minas Conga production, Yanacocha expects to place the last ton of ore on its leach pads in 2014. Including the estimated time required for residual leaching, rinsing and reclamation activities, Yanacocha expects that its leaching operations will terminate within approximately tensix years following the date that the last ton of ore is placed on the leach pad.

The current portion of leach pad inventoriespads is determined based on engineering estimates of the quantities of gold at the balance sheet date that areis expected to be recovered during the next twelve months.

In-process Inventory

In-process inventories represent materials that are currently in the process of being converted to a saleable product. Yanacocha's conversion process is leach in-circuit. In-process material is measured based on assays of the material fed tointo the process and the projected recoveries of the respective plants. In-process inventories are valued at the average cost of the material fed tointo the process attributable to the source material coming from the mines, stockpiles and/or leach pads plus the in-process conversion costs, including applicable depreciation relating to the process facilities incurred to that point in the process.

Precious Metals Inventory

Precious metals inventories include gold doréore and/or gold bullion. Precious metals that result from Yanacocha's mining and processing activities are valued at the average cost of the respective in-process inventory incurred prior to the refining process, plus applicable refining costs.

Amortization of Property, Plant and Mine Development

Yanacocha's key judgments under its property, plant, andAmortization charges for mine development policy include the estimation of the useful lives of its various asset types, the election to utilize certain methods for recording depreciation, management's judgment regarding appropriate capitalization or expensing of costs related to these assets, and the determination that no impairment exists

Expenditures for new facilities or expenditures that extend the useful lives of existing facilities are capitalized and depreciatedcalculated using the straight-lineunits of production method at rates sufficient to depreciate such costsand are based on Yanacocha's current gold production as a percentage of total expected gold production over the estimated productive liveslife of such facilities, which do not exceed the related estimated mine lives of such facilities based on proven and probable reserves.

Mineral exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, costs incurred prospectively to develop such property are capitalized as incurred and are amortized using the units-of-production ("UOP") method over the estimatedYanacocha's mines. The life of the ore body based onmines is estimated by Yanacocha's geology department using interpretations of mineral reserves, as determined in accordance with the estimated recoverable ounces mined from proven and probable reserves. These costs include costs to further delineateSEC's Industry Guide 7. The estimate of the ore body and remove overburden to initially expose the ore body.  The process of determining proven and probable reserves and determining the estimatedtotal expected future life of an ore body requires engineering estimates. Such estimates have been computed using methods consistent with industry practice, which primarily utilize geologic interpretationsYanacocha's mines could be materially different from the actual amount of gold mined in the future and minimum grade thresholds. Cut-off grades and pit limits have been defined based on the results of Lerchs-Grossman pit limit analysis.

Major development costs incurred after the commencement of production are amortized using the UOP method based on estimated recoverable ounces mined from proven and probable reserves. To the extent that these costs benefit the entire ore body, they are amortized over the estimatedactual life of the ore body.

Ongoing development expendituresmines due to maintain production are charged to operations as incurred. Repair and maintenance costs incurredchanges in connection with major maintenance activities are charged to operations as incurred.

Interest expense allocable to the costs of developing mining properties and to constructing new facilities is capitalized until assets are ready for their intended use.

Mineral interests

Mineral interests are recorded at fair value at the time acquired,factors used in property, plant and mine development and representdetermining Yanacocha's mineral use rights regardless of whether Yanacochaowns the related surface rights ("mining concessions"). Yanacocha'smineral assets represent mineral use rights related to production, development or exploration stage properties, and the value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineral interests believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. Such mineral asset values consider certain estimates of recoverable minerals from exploration mineral stage interest which are risk adjusted based on management's relative confidence in such materials. Production stage mineral interests represent interests in operating properties that contain proven and probable reserves. Development stage mineral interests represent interests in properties under development that contain proven and probable reserves. Exploration stage mineral interests represent interests in properties that are believed to potentially contain (i) other mineralized materialreserves, such as inferred material within pits; measured, indicatedthe gold price and inferred material with insufficient drill spacing to qualify as proven and probable reserves; and inferred materialoperating costs. Any change in close proximity to proven and probable reserves; (ii) around-mine exploration potential such as inferred material not immediately adjacent to existing reserves and mineralization but located within the immediate mine infrastructure; (iii) other mine-related exploration potential that is not part of measured, indicated or inferred material and is comprised mainly of material outsidemanagement's estimate of the immediate mine area; or (iv) greenfields exploration potential that is not associated with any other production, development or exploration stage property, as described above.total expected future life of Yanacocha's mining concessions are enforceable regardless of whether proven and probable rese rves have been established. In addition, these mining concessions provide for bothmines would impact the right to explore and exploit. However, Yanacocha must first obtain the respective exploration and exploitation permits, which are generally grantedamortization charge recorded in due course. Yanacocha may retain mining concessions indefinitely by paying annual fees and, during exploitation, complying with production obligations or paying assessed fines. Mining concessions are freely assignable or transferable.Yanacocha's financial statements.

Asset Impairment

Yanacocha reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the asset. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows. Future cash flows are estimated based on quantities of recoverable minerals, expected gold and other commodity prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), production levels and cash costs of production and capital, all based on life-of-mine plans. The term "recoverable minerals" refers to the estimated amount of gold and other minerals that will be obtained from proven and probable reserves and all related exploration stage mineral interests after taking into account losses during ore processing and treatment. In estimating future c ash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset groups. All assets at an operating segment are considered together for purposes of estimating future cash flows. Assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Reclamation and Remediation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", which established a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. The statement was adopted on January 1, 2003, when Yanacocha recorded the estimated present value of reclamation liabilities and increased the carrying amount of the related assetassets which resulted in a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of US$32.4 million, net of US$10.2 million in taxes. Seetaxes (see Note 9 to the Yanacocha Financial Statements.Statements). Reclamation costs are allocated to expense over the life of the related assets and are adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate. Accounting andfor reclamation and remediation obligations requirerequires management to make estimates, asunique to each of Yanacocha's oper ations, of the future costs Yanacocha will incu rincur to complete the remediation and reclamation and remediation work required for a mine to comply with existing laws and regulations. Actual costs incurred in future periods could differ from estimated amounts.amounts estimated. Additionally, future changes to environmental laws and regulations could increase the extent of the reclamation and remediationrehabilitation work required to be performed by Yanacocha. Any such increaseincreases in future costs could materially impact the amounts charged to operationsearnings for reclamation and remediation.

PriorResults of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004

Sales

Sales increased 19 percent from US$1,249.9 million in 2004 to US$1,490.4 million in 2005, due principally to an increase of 10 percent in production and an increase of 9 percent in price per ounce of gold. The average price per ounce of gold increased from US$411 in 2004 to US$448 in 2005, which resulted in a total sales increase of approximately US$240.5 million for the year. Increased production resulted in a 9 percent increase in the quantity of gold sold, from 3,039,873 ounces in 2004 to 3,327,515 ounces in 2005. Production by mine was as follows:

Mine

2005

2004

 

Ounces

Ounces

Yanacocha

1,198,161

740,087

La Quinua

1,674,329

1,530,112

Carachugo

421,967

701,491

Maqui Maqui

38,631

45,612

 

3,333,088

3,017,302

The increase in production in ounces of gold produced in 2005 compared to 2004 was mainly attributed to an increase in the ounces processed (23 percent) from higher leach tons placed from 121.1 million dry metric tons at December 31, 2004 to 133.0 million dry metric tons at December 31, 2005, with higher average grade of 0.86 grams per ton at December 31, 2004 compared to 0.96 grams per ton at December 31, 2005.

Costs applicable to sales

Costs applicable to sales increased 13 percent from US$451 million in 2004 to US$508 million in 2005, due primarily to higher operating costs mainly attributed to the increase in cost of diesel, consumption of cyanide and personnel costs, as well as increased royalties and workers profit participation expenses, partially off-set by higher by-product credits. Costs applicable to sales per ounce of gold increased 3 percent from US$148.3 in 2004 to US$152.6 in 2005, primarily as a result of a higher operating cost per ounce of US$119 in 2004 compared to US$122 in 2005, and as result of higher workers' profit participation costs due to a higher applicable net taxable income, which was partially off-set by an increased by-product metal sales credit from an increase in silver ounces sold. Operating costs increased from US$348.9 million in 2004 to US$428.2 million in 2005. Operating costs consist primarily of drilling, blasting, loading and hauling costs which increased in 2005 primarily as a result of an increase in fuel price to an average of US$2.38 per gallon in 2004 compared to US$2.57 per gallon in 2005. Additional increases in operating costs resulted from the greater consumption of critical items such as drills, nitrate, tires, cyanide and lime (from increase tonnage mined and treated), electricity, increase of personnel cost related to new employees hired (as part of the self performance program) and greater expense on donations and charitable contributions as part of the social responsibility plan.

The increase in the royalty expense paid to S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca (equivalent to 3 percent of net sales) was directly related to the increase in sales revenues. Royalty expense was US$37.9 million in 2004 compared to US$45.6 million in 2005. Workers profit participation expense is calculated based on taxable income and in accordance with Peruvian labor legislation. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Employees." This increase in workers profit participation expense is directly related to the increase of net taxable income. Workers' participation was US$53.9 million in 2004 and US$68.8 million in 2005.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased 8 percent from US$179.4 million in 2004 to US$193.6 million in 2005. This increase was attributable principally to the decrease in the volume of inventories, which resulted in a lower amount of capitalized depreciation and a higher amount charged to the results of the year and higher depreciation expense in connection with its asset retirement cost as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 143 estimated future reclamationfrom US$5.9 million in 2004 to US$7.1 million in 2005.

Exploration Expenses

Exploration costs decreased US$2.3 million from US$35.2 million in 2004 to US$32.9 million in 2005 due to the capitalization of Minas Conga expenses which amounted to US$15.9 million in 2004, and were based principally on legaloffset somewhat by higher expenses in regional and regulatory requirements. Such costsdistrict exploration, near mine drilling and advanced projects.

Other expenses

Other expenses decreased in 2005 primarily due to an adjustment for reduced asset retirement cost of US$10.8 million related to active minesthe Maqui Maqui mine. In 2004 other expenses were accruedrelated to a US$4.2 million write-down of La Quinua in connection with its agglomeration plant.

Interest expense and charged overother income

Interest expense and other income increased 350 percent to US$3.5 million in 2005 from an expense of US$1.4 million in 2004. This increase was due primarily to increased interest income from an increase in average cash available in banks with higher interest rates during 2005 and lower interest expense in 2005 as a result of a lower debt position (US$37.0 million in 2004 compared to US$3.2 million in 2005).

Income tax provision

The increase in income tax provision was directly related to Yanacocha's increase in taxable income. The net effective tax rate was 31.7 percent in 2004 compared to 30.9 percent in 2005. The statutory rate for both years was a blend of 30 percent. The factors that most significantly impacted Yanacocha's net effective tax rate were related to non-deductible expenses and penalties.

The uniform income tax rate in Peru was 27 percent of taxable income in 2003. Effective January 1, 2004, the expected operating livesincome tax rate in Peru is 30 percent of taxable income (Yanacocha, as explained below, has a stabilized corporate tax rate of 30 percent, excluding income from the mines usingLa Quinua mine which had a tax rate of 27 percent until December 31, 2003 and 29 percent since January 1, 2004) and for financial statement purposes is calculated for Yanacocha in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Pursuant to Supreme Decree No. 027-98-EF, mining companies can obtain a tax benefit in the UOP methodform of an investment credit, by effectively reinvesting non-distributed earnings into capital expansion projects that increase Yanacocha's productivity. This investment credit is based on proven80 percent of amounts reinvested and probable reserves. Future remediation costs for inactive mines were accrued based on management's best estimate at the end of each period of the undiscounted costs expectedis obtained by application to be incurred at a site. Such cost estimates included, where applicable, ongoing care, maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates were reflected in earnings in the period an estimate was revised.

Income Tax and Profit Sharing

Yanacocha accounts for income tax and legally required profit sharing using the liability method, recognizing certain temporary differences between the financial reporting basis of Yanacocha's liabilities and assets and the related income tax basis for such liabilities and assets. This method generates a net deferred income tax liability and profit sharing liability or net deferred income tax asset and profit sharing asset for Yanacocha as of the end of the year, as measuredapproval by the statutoryMEM.

Yanacocha has entered into Mining Law Stabilization Agreements under the General Mining Law with the Peruvian government. A Mining Law Stabilization Agreement is a standardized agreement prepared by the MEM, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, the Central Bank and other Peruvian governmental ministries. Such agreements (i) provide stabilized corporate tax and profit sharing rates, in effect as enacted. Yanacocha derives its deferred income tax charge or benefit and profit sharing charge or benefit by recording(ii) grant the change in the net deferred income tax liability and profit sharing liability or net deferred income tax asset and profit sharing asset balance for the year, based on Peruvian income tax and profit sharing rates.

Yanacocha's deferred income tax assets include certain future tax benefits. Yanacocha records a valuation allowance against any portion of those deferred income tax assets when it believes, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows and the application of existing tax laws. See "-Asset Impairment for a discussion of the factors that could cause future cash flows to differ from estimates. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, Yanacocha's ability to realize deferred tax assets recorded at the balance date could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws could limit the Yanacocha's ability to obtain futureVAT credit, (iii) provide full access to foreign currency and guarantee treatment in all foreign exchange matters as is given to Peruvian nationals, (iv) protect against foreign exchange controls and (v) grant the right to freely dispose of and export mineral products. Yanacocha has entered into such agreements with regard to the following mines: Carachugo/San Jose, Maqui Maqui, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua. Pursuant to these agreements, the income tax benefits represented by its deferredrate in Peru is 30 percent of taxable income, excluding income from the La Quinua mine which had a tax assets recorded atrate of 27 percent until December 31, 2 003 and 29 percent sinceJanuary 1, 2004.

Net Income

As a consequence of the reporting date.foregoing, net income increased 35 percent from US$390.3 million in 2004 to US$525.5 million in 2005. As a percent of sales, net income increased from 31 percent in 2004 to 35 percent in 2005.

Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

Sales

Sales increased 21 percent from US$1,036.4 million in 2003 to US$1,249.9 million in 2004, due principally to an increase of 6 percent in production and an increase of 13 percent in price per ounce of gold. The average price per ounce of gold increased from US$363 in 2003 to US$411 in 2004, which resulted in a total sales increase of approximately US$213.5 million for the year. Increased production resulted in a 6 percent increase in the quantity of gold sold, from 2,858,680 ounces in 2003 to 3,039,873 ounces in 2004. Production by mine was as follows:

Mine

2004

2003

2004

2003

Ounces

Ounces

Ounces

Ounces

Yanacocha

740,087

813,132

740,087

813,132

La Quinua

1,530,112

1,146,757

1,530,112

1,146,757

Carachugo

701,491

826,920

701,491

826,920

Maqui - Maqui

45,612

64,334

Maqui Maqui

45,612

64,334

3,017,302

2,851,143

3,017,302

2,851,143

The increase in production in ounces of gold produced in 2004 compared to 2003 was mainly attributed to an increase in the recovery of gold due to improved performance at the processing plants, additional works and increased innovation at leaching pads; partially off-set by a decrease in the leach tons placed from 131.8 million dry metric tons at December 31, 2003 to 121.1 million dry metric tons at December 31, 2004 and a lower grade of ore mined from 0.93 grams per ton at December 31, 2003 to 0.85 grams per ton at December 31, 2004.

Costs applicable to sales

Costs applicable to sales increased 20 percent from US$377 million in 2003 to US$451 million in 2004, due primarily to higher operating costs mainly attributed to the increase in cost of diesel, consumption of cyanide and personnel costs, as well as increased royalties and workers profit participation expenses, partially off-set by higher by-product credits. Cash costs per ounce of gold increased 13.9 percent from US$129 in 2003 to US$147 in 2004, primarily as a result of a higher operating cost per ounce of US$119 in 2004 compared to US$104 in 2003, and as result of higher workers' profit participation costs due to a higher applicable net taxable income, which was partially off-set by an increased by-product metal sales credit from an increase in silver ounces sold. Operating costs increased from US$316.3 million in 2003 to US$348.9 million in 2004. Operating costs consist primarily of drilling, blasting, loading and hauling costs which increased in 2004 primarily as a result of an increasein crease in fuel price to an average of US$2.38 per gallon in 2004 compared to US$1.93 per gallon in 2003. Additional increases in operating costs resulted from the greater consumption of critical items such as cyanide and lime (as per inventory reduction plan), electricity, increase of personnel cost related to new employees hired and greater expense on donations and charitable contributions as part of the social responsibility plan.

The increase in the royalty expense paid to S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca (equivalent to 3 percent of net sales) was directly related to the increase in sales revenues. Royalty expense was US$37.9 million in 2004 compared to US$31.7 million in 2003. Workers profit participation expense is calculated based on taxable income and in accordance with Peruvian labor legislation. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Employees." This increase in workers profit participation expense is directly related to the increase of net taxable income. Workers' participation was US$53.9 million in 2004 and US$44.5 million in 2003.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased 22 percent from US$146.8 million in 2003 to US$179.4 million in 2004. This increase was attributable principally to the decrease in the volume of inventories, which results in a lower amount of capitalized depreciation and a higher amount charged to the results of the year. Yanacocha also incurred an additional depreciation expense of US$5.9 million in connection with its asset retirement cost as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 143.

Exploration Expenses

Exploration costs increased by US$11.4 million primarily due to intensive drilling at Minas Conga for US$15.9 million in order to define reserves as of December 31, 2004.

Other expenses

Other expenses decreased in 2004 primarily due to a US$4.2 million write-down of part of the agglomeration plant of La Quinua. In 2003, other expenses included an adjustment for asset retirement cost of US$16.6 million related to the Maqui Maqui mine.

Interest expense and other income

Interest expense and other income increased 27 percent to US$1.4 million in 2004 from US$1.1 million in 2003. This increase was due primarily to lower other income in 2004 and lower interest expense in 2004 as a result of a lower debt position (US$37.0 million in 2004 compared to US$67.0 million in 2003).

Income tax provision

The increase in income tax provision was directly related to Yanacocha's increase in taxable income. The net effective tax rate was 31.7 percent in 2004 compared to 25.6 percent in 2003. The statutory rate for both years was a blend of 30 percent. The factors that most significantly impacted Yanacocha's net effective tax rate were related to non-deductible expenses and penalties.

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

As explained above under Critical Accounting Policies, Yanacocha adopted SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", on January 1, 2003 and recorded the estimated present value of reclamation liabilities, ("or asset retirement obligation"obligation or "ARO")ARO, and increased the carrying amount of the related asset to be retired in the future. Yanacocha allocates the carrying amount of the related asset to expense over the life of the related assets, adjusting for changes resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate. At January 1, 2003, Yanacocha recorded approximately US$50 million for the carrying amount of the related asset, net, an increase of approximately US$72.1 million to ARO, an increase of US$7.9 million to deferred tax liabilities, and an increase of US$2.3 million to deferred profit sharing liabilities. As of December 31, 2004, Yanacocha recorded an increase of US$10.7 million in the ARO for the Carac hugo mine. A net increase of US$3.9 million was recorded for the other mines.

ARO corresponds primarily to activities to be performed in the restoration of the mines and related areas once the gold extraction process has been finished. The principal activities that Yanacocha plans to perform for each mine include the operation of water treatment plants, demolition work, re-vegetation work, earth work and rinsing of the leach pad areas.

At December 31, 2004 the ARO per mine was composed as follows:

Mine

ARO

(in thousands of US$)

Maqui Maqui

21,554

Carachugo

35,747

La Quinua

22,703

Cerro Yanacocha

26,726

China Linda

302

107,031

Net Income

As a consequence of the foregoing, net income increased 22 percent from US$320.4 million in 2003 to US$390.3 million in 2004. As a percent of sales, net income increased from 30.9 percent in 2003 to 31.2 percent in 2004.

Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

Sales

Sales increased 45 percent from US$713.4 million in 2002 to US$1,036.4 million in 2003, due principally to an increase of 24.7 percent in production and an increase of 17 percent in price per ounce of gold. The average price per ounce of gold increased from US$311 in 2002 to US$363 in 2003, which resulted in a total sales increase of approximately US$149 million for the year. Increased production resulted in a 25 percent increase in the quantity of gold sold, from 2,291,967 ounces in 2002 to 2,858,680 ounces in 2003. Production by mine was as follows:

Mine

2003

2002

 

Ounces

Ounces

Yanacocha

813,132

903,581

La Quinua

1,146,757

765,756

Carachugo

826,920

585,250

Maqui - Maqui

64,334

30,997

 

2,851,143

2,285,584

The increase in production at the La Quinua and Carachugo mines was due to higher levels of tonnage placed in leach pads, the higher level of head grade of ore placed and the improved grade of the pregnant solution from carbon columns contributions.

Costs applicable to sales

Costs applicable to sales increased 21 percent from US$313 million in 2002 to US$377 million in 2003, due primarily to higher operating cost, royalties and workers profit participation cost. Cash costs per ounce of gold decreased 3.8 percent from US$134 in 2002 to US$129 in 2003, primarily as a result of a lower operating cost per ounce of US$115 in 2002 compared to US$104 in 2003, and as result of an improved grade in ore mined and contributions of additional carbon columns at La Quinua and Cerro Yanacocha. This decrease was partially off-set by an increased workers participation cost per ounce of gold due to a higher applicable net taxable income. Operating costs increased from US$302.5 million in 2002 to US$316.3 million in 2003. Operating costs consist primarily of blasting, loading and hauling costs which increased in 2003 primarily as a result of an increase in fuel price to an average of US$1.83 per gallon in 2003 compared to US$1.43 per gallon in 2002. Additional increases in o perating costs resulted from the increase in costs associated with Yanacocha's assistance to the City of Cajamarca.

The increase in the royalty expense paid to S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca (equivalent to 3 percent of net sales) was directly related to the increase in sales revenues. Royalty expense was US$31.7 million in 2003 compared to US$21.6 million in 2002. Workers profit participation expense is calculated based on taxable income and in accordance with Peruvian labor legislation. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Employees." This increase in workers profit participation expense is directly related to the increase of net taxable income. Workers' participation was US$44.5 million in 2003 and US$24.1 million in 2002.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased 28 percent from US$114.8 million in 2002 to US$146.8 million in 2003. This increase was attributable principally to leach pad expansion at the La Quinua (Stage 3) and Carachugo (Stage 9) mines, whose assets were depreciated for the entire year 2003. Yanacocha also incurred an additional depreciation expense of US$9.5 million in connection with its asset retirement cost as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 143. In addition, Yanacocha capitalized less depreciation into inventory in 2003 than 2002 as a result of increased production and other additions to the property, plant and equipment contributed to the increase in depreciation.

Other expenses

Other expenses increased primarily due to the write-off of US$16.6 million for asset retirement cost related to the Maqui Maqui mine. This write-off was off-set by a US$1.3 million insurance payment received in connection with a settlement related to the remediation costs incurred in connection with mercury spill in 2000. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Legal Proceedings". In addition, the insurance payment was off-set by US$0.9 million in remediation costs incurred for public environmental clean-up and fines associated with general remediation liabilities.

Interest expense and other income

Interest expense and other income decreased 86 percent to US$1.1 million in 2003 from US$7.5 million in 2002. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in Yanacocha's debt position from US$115 million in 2002 to US$67.0 million in 2003 and an increase in the amount of interest capitalized in 2003 to US$4.5 million from US$3.0 million in 2002 as a result of increased capital investments in construction.

Income tax provision

The increase in income tax provision was directly related to Yanacocha's increase in taxable income. The net effective tax rate was 25.6 percent in 2003 compared to 24.6 percent in 2002. The statutory rate for both years was a blend of 30 percent and 27 percent. The difference in the effective rate was a result of investment credits.

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

As explained above under Critical Accounting Policies, Yanacocha adopted SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", on January 1, 2003 and recorded the estimated present value of reclamation liabilities ("asset retirement obligation" or "ARO") and increased the carrying amount of the related asset to be retired in the future. Yanacocha allocates the carrying amount of the related asset to expense over the life of the related assets, adjusting for changes resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate. At January 1, 2003, Yanacocha recorded approximately US$50 million for the carrying amount of the related asset, net, an increase of approximately US$72.1 million to ARO, an increase of US$7.9 million to deferred tax liabilities, and an increase of US$2.3 million to deferred profit sharing liabilities. As of December 31, 2003, Yanacocha recorded a decrease of US$26.4 million in ARO for the Cerro Yana cocha mine and an increase of US$16.6 million in the ARO for the Maqui Maqui mine. A net decrease of US$0.8 million was recorded for the other mines.

The ARO corresponds primarily to activities to be performed in the restoration of the mines and related areas once the gold extraction process has been finished. The principal activities that Yanacocha plans to perform for each mine include the operation of water treatment plants, demolition work, re-vegetation work, earth work and rinsing of the leach pad areas.

At December 31, 2003 the ARO per mine was composed as follows:

Mine

ARO

(in thousands of US$)

Maqui Maqui

25,111

Carachugo

25,606

La Quinua

17,929

Cerro Yanacocha

22,773

China Linda

329

91,748

Net Income

As a consequence of the foregoing, net income increased 62 percent from US$197.9 million in 2002 to US$320.4 million in 2003. As a percent of sales, net income increased from 27.7 percent in 2002 to 30.9 percent in 2003.

Non-GAAP information reconciliation

Operating cash cost per ounce of gold sold is defined as the total of costs applicable to sales less non-cash provisions for reclamation and remediation costs. Operating cash is comprised of operating costs, management fees, royalty expenses, selling expenses, write off of assets, workers' profit participation costs and credits for by-product sales. Operating cash cost is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not have a standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures provided by other companies. When analyzing operating performance, investors should use Operatingoperating cash cost in addition to, and not as an alternative to, cost ofcosts applicable to sales. Operating cash cost per ounce is derived from historical statements of income and is presented as supplemental information because management believes it provides additional information to evaluate operations. A reconciliation of Yanacocha's operating cash cost per ounce to U.S. GAAP cost of sales is presented below.be low.

Year Ending December 31,

2004

2003

2002

2005

2004

2003

US$

c/ per unit

US$

c/ per unit

US$

c/ per unit

(US$000)

(c per unit)

(US$000)

(c per unit)

(US$000)

(c per unit)

Cost applicable to sales (U.S. GAAP)

450,825

148.3

377,214

132.0

312,980

136.6

507,806

152.6

450,825

148.3

377,214

132.0

Accretion expense

(6,025)

(2.0)

(6,534)

(2.3)

(6,876)

(3.0)

(7,059)

(2.1)

(6,025)

(2.0)

(6,534)

(2.3)

Other operating costs

608

0.2

(688)

(0.3)

943

0.4

-

608

0.2

(688)

(0.3)

Cash costs

445,408

146.5

369,992

129.4

307,047

134.0

500,747

150.5

445,408

146.5

369,992

129.4

Total ounces sold

3,039,873

2,858,680

2,291,967

3,327,515

3,039,873

2,858,680

Operating cash cost per ounce

146

129

134

Operating cash cost per ounce (US$)

150

146

129

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash provided by operating activities

At December 31, 2004,2005, Yanacocha had cash and cash equivalents of US$69.8 million,295.5million, substantially all of which were held in U.S. Dollars, as compared to US$46.4 million and US$46.869.8 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively. The 2003 figure excludes cash and cash equivalents in the Bank of New York established in connection with the Yanacocha Receivables Securitization. These funds were restricted and a portion was held in escrow for payment of Yanacocha's next interest and principal installments. In June 2004, the Trust Certificates issued in connection with the Yanacocha Receivables Securitization were paid in full, and at December 31, 2004, no restricted funds were held.2004.

Cash provided by operating activities

Yanacocha's operations generated a net cash flow of US$667.7 million in 2005, US$548.2 million in 2004 and US$553.6 million in 20032003. The increase in net cash flow provided by operating activities in 2005 is primarily attributable to higher sales revenues, partially offset by increased operating costs and US$320.0 million in 2002.higher level of materials and supplies inventories. The increase in net cash flow provided by operating activities in 2004 iswas primarily attributable to the increase in production and sales of gold, partially off-set by higher cash costs and income tax pre-payments. The increase in net cash flow in operating activities in 2003 was attributable to the increase in gold prices and gold ounces sold partially off-set by higher cash costs.

Cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities was US$225.8 million in 2005, US$231.4 million in 2004 and US$205.7 million in 20032003. In 2005, investing activities consisted primarily of capital expenditures associated with the expansions of the La Quinua (stages 5 and 6), Cerro Yanacocha (stage 7) and Carachugo (stage 10) leach pads for US$146.756.0 millions, mine development of Chaquicocha, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua for US$23.9 millions, new mine equipment for US$30.2 millions, environmental projects for US$12.0 millions among others. In addition Yanacocha invested US$17.4 million in 2002. Investingdeveloping the Minas Conga project. In 2004, investing activities consisted primarily of capital expenditures associated with the expansions of the La Quinua (stage 4) and Cerro Yanacocha (stage 6) leach pads. Yanacocha invested US$22.2 million and US$14.5 million, respectively, in 2004 for these projects. In addition, Yanacocha invested US$13.1 million in the construction of the new carbon column plant and strippingstrippin g circuit for Carachugo mine, US$36.9 million in new mining equipment, US$20.4 for environmental and regional water management projects and the remaining balance in other ongoing expansion work. In 2003, investing activities consisted primarily of capital expenditures associated with the expansions of the La Quinua (stage(stages 2 &and 4) and Cerro Yanacocha (stages 5 &and 6) leach pads. Yanacocha invested US$40.6 million and US$32 million, respectively, in 2003 for these projects. In addition, Yanacoch aYanacocha invested US$18.3 million in the construction of two new carbon column plants for each of the La Quinua and Cerro Yanacocha mines, US$30.3 million in new mining equipment, US$24.4 for environmental and regional water management projects and the remaining balance in other ongoing expansion work. For 2002, principal capital expenditures were related to leach pad expansions (US$69.2 million), environmental expenditures (US$14.3 million), carbon column plant and new refinery (US$12.9 million) and other replacement capital.

Cash used in financing activities

Net cash used in financing activities was US$216.1 million in 2005, US$293.4 million in 2004 and US$348.4 million in 20032003. In 2005, financing activities consisted of the repayment of US$34.2 million of long-term debt and dividends of US$136.9180 million in 2002.distributed to partners. In 2004, financing activities consisted basically of the repayments of long-term debt of US$95.5 million and dividends distributed to partners of US$280 million, slightly off-set by proceeds from debt of US$65.5 million. In 2003, financing activities consisted principally of the payment of long-term debt of US$47.6 million and dividend payments to partners of US$300.0 million. In 2002, financing activities consisted principally of the payments of dividends to partners of US$50.7 million and repayments of long-term debt of US$111.9 million, which was off-set by proceeds from long-term debt of US$28.8 million.

Exploration and Development Costs; Capital Expenditures

Exploration

Yanacocha's explorationbasic and developmentadvanced exploration costs during the period from 1992 through 20042005 were financed with a combination of internally generated funds, advances from partners and loans from DEG and IFC. ForDuring 2003, 2004 and 2005, Yanacocha incurred US$13.6 million, US$35.2 million and US$32.9, million respectively, in exploration. During 2006, Yanacocha plans to spend approximately US$24.824.2 million on exploration and development that will be expensed and an additional US$3.4 million that will be capitalized and that relates to exploration activities for ore bodies that are currently classified as reserves.exploration. These exploration and development costs include all of the costs associated with exploration activities such as drilling services (which are subcontracted), geologists and metallurgical testing. Yanacocha is also planning to invest US$12.2 million to develop the Minas Conga ore body. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Exploration."

Capital Expenditures

Yanacocha's capital expenditures from its formation in 1992 through 20042005 were financed with a combination of internally generated funds, advances from shareholders, loans from DEG and IFC and proceeds from the Yanacocha Receivables Securitization (see Note 10 to the Yanacocha Financial Statements). Such capital expenditures have related principally to the developmentconstruction of the Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua mining operations, the construction of the two plants at Carachugo and Yanacocha that includeincludes a leach solution processing facility and a smelter at each plant, the construction of four carbon column plants, at Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua, the acquisition of both new and used mining equipment, the construction of two dams, the construction of one agglomeration plant at La Quinua, and the expansion of the leach pads for the Carachugo, Maqui Maqui, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua mining operations. Yanacocha's capital expenditures from its formation through DecemberDecemb er 31, 20042005 totaled approximately US$1,640.11,870.0 million. Yanacocha anticipates that its capital expenditures for 2006 will be approximately US$327.0 million, in connection with the expansion of the Carachugo stage 10 and La Quinua stage 6 leach pads, continuation of the site-wide management plan to control sediments and chemicals, installation of a reverse osmosis plant for EWT at Pampa Larga, development of Chaquicocha, continuation of the Gold Mill project, delineation of the Minas Conga ore body, construction of an alternate road to the coast and acquisition of heavy mining equipment and various other equipment.

Yanacocha expects that it will meet its working capital, capital expenditure and exploration and development requirements for the next several years from internally generated funds, cash on hand, borrowings from banks and financial institutions. Yanacocha expects that it will not need additional financing if the price of gold remains over US$250 per ounce. There can be no assurance that sufficient funding will be available to Yanacocha from internal or external sources to finance future working capital, capital expenditures and exploration and development requirements, or that external funding will be available for such purpose on terms or at prices favorable to Yanacocha. A very significant decline in the price of gold would be reasonably likely to affect the availability of such sources of liquidity.

Yanacocha anticipates that its capital expenditures for 2005 will be approximately US$263.9 million (including the capitalized exploration costs referred to above).

Research and Development

The Company isWe are a mining exploration development and production company and doesdo not engage in research and development activities.

Trend Information

The Company's Trend Information

Other than as disclosed in this Annual Report, the Company iswe are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events which are reasonably likely to have a material effect upon the Company'sour net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause reported financial information to be not necessarily be indicative of future operating results or financial condition.

For the Company'sour exploration activities, there is no production, sales or inventory in a conventional sense. The Company'sOur financial success is dependent upon the extent to which it iswe are capable of discovering mineralization and the economic viability of developing exploration properties. The developmentconstruction and operation of such properties may take years to complete and the resulting income, if any, cannot be determined with certainty. Further, the sales value of mineralization discovered by the Companyus is largely dependent upon factors beyond the Company'sour control, including the market value at any given time of the metals produced.

Yanacocha's Trend Information

Other than as disclosed in this Annual Report, Yanacocha has informed the Companyus that it is not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events which are reasonably likely to have a material effect upon Yanacocha's net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause reported financial information to not necessarily be indicative of future operating results or financial condition.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company'sOur Off-Balance Sheet Information

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company'sour financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Yanacocha's Off-balance Sheet Information

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on Yanacocha's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

The Company'sOur Contractual Obligations

The following table shows the Company'sour contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:2005:

 

Payments Due By Period (in millions of Nuevos Soles)

 

Payments Due By Period (in millions of Nuevos Soles)

 

Less than

1-3

4-5

After 5

 

Less than

1-3

4-5

After 5

Total

1 year

years

Total

1 year

years

Long-Term Debt-------------...

110.5

67.1

43.4

N/A

2,998

1,631

1,367

0

 

 

Total Contractual Cash Obligations------..

   110.5

    67.1

   43.4

      N/A

   N/A

2,998

1,631

1,367

0

As of December 31, 2004, the Company2005, we had no other commercial commitments.

Yanacocha's Contractual Obligations

The following table shows Yanacocha's contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:2005:

 

Payments Due By Period
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars)

 

Payments Due By Period
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars)

 

Less than

1-3

4-5

After 5

 

Less than

1-3

4-5

After 5

Total

year

years

years

Total

year

years

Long-Term Debt

32,582

13,333

17,176

2,073

N/A

0

0

Capital Lease Obligations

7,316

4,156

3,160

N/A

N/A

3,160

3,160

0

Reclamation and Remediation Liability

107,031

4,312

26,646

11,544

64,529

118,565

5,623

0

Open purchase orders

42,213

42,213

-

-

9,275

9,275

0

Other Long-Term Obligations (*)

59,625

20,361

21,642

11,084

6,538

70,478

40,970

25,098

4,410

0

 

 

Total Contractual Cash Obligations

248,767

84,375

68,624

24,701

71,067

201,478

59,028

25,098

4,410

0

___________

(*) Other long-term contracts include deferred workers compensation obligations, power and fuel supply contract commitments and fuel and inventory obligations.

Long-term debt reflects two IFC credit facilities for US$10 million, including estimated interest based on the December 2004 rate of 4.9%, and US$20 million, including estimated interest based on the December 2004 rate of 5.0%, respectively, which are collateralized by certain of Yanacocha's assets.

ITEM 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

Board of Directors and Senior Management

TheOur Board of Directors of the Company is responsible for policy decisions and our overall direction of the Company and other corporate matters in accordance with the Companyour By-laws and the Peruvian Companies Law. The Company'sOur executive officers oversee theour business of the Company and are responsible for the execution of the policy decisions of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors, which must be comprised of seven members, is elected at the annual obligatory meeting of shareholders, (the "Annualor the Annual Obligatory Meeting")Meeting for a three year term. The last election took place on March 25, 2005, and the next election is scheduled for March 2008.See Item 10. "Additional Information-Memorandum and Articles of Association".

The Company'sOur current directors and executive officers are as follows:

Name

Position

Date First

Appointed

Current
Term Ends

Directors

Alberto Benavides de la Quintana(1)

Chairman of the Board

1980

March 2008

Norman Anderson

Director

1994

March 2008

Luis Coleridge

Director

2000

March 2008

Aubrey Laurence Paverd

Director

2002

March 2008

Felipe Ortiz-de-Zevallos

Director

2003

March 2008

Roque Benavides Ganoza(2)

Director

2004

March 2008

Germán Suárez Chávez(3)

Director

2005

March 2008

Executive Officers

Roque Benavides Ganoza(1)

President and Chief Executive Officer

2001

Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

2001

Raúl Benavides Ganoza(1)

Business Development Vice President

1997

Mario Santillán Farje

Operations Vice President

1992

José Miguel Morales Dasso(1)

General Counsel

1970

César E. Vidal

Explorations Vice President

1996

Carlos Humberto Rodríguez Calle

Comptroller

1975

Name

Age

Position

Date First

Appointed

Current
Term Ends

Directors

 

 

 

 

Alberto Benavides de la Quintana(1)

85

Chairman of the Board

1980

March 2008

Norman Anderson

75

Director

1994

March 2008

Luis Coleridge

69

Director

2000

March 2008

Aubrey Laurence Paverd

67

Director

2002

March 2008

Felipe Ortiz-de-Zevallos

58

Director

2003

March 2008

Roque Benavides Ganoza(2)

51

Director

2004

March 2008

Germán Suárez Chávez(3)

64

Director

2005

March 2008

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officers

 

 

 

 

Roque Benavides Ganoza(1)

51

President and Chief Executive Officer

2001

 

Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos

53

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

2001

 

Raúl Benavides Ganoza(1)

50

Business Development Vice President

1997

 

Mario Santillán Farje

64

Operations Vice President

1992

 

José Miguel Morales Dasso(1)

60

General Counsel

1970

 

César E. Vidal

51

Explorations Vice President

1996

 

Carlos Humberto Rodríguez Calle

61

Comptroller

1984

 

_______________

(1) Alberto Benavides de la Quintana is the father of Roque Benavides Ganoza and Raúl Benavides Ganoza, the father-in-law of José Miguel Morales Dasso and the brother of Jorge Benavides de la Quintana.

(2) Roque Benavides Ganoza replaced Jorge Benavides de la Quintana, who was a Director until July 2004

(3) Germán Suárez replaced Carlos Plenge Washburn, who was Director until March 2005.

Set forth below is biographical information concerning members of the management of the Company:our management:

Alberto Benavides de la Quintana, Founder, Chairman and member of the Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Alberto Benavides served as our Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1953 to February 2001 and as a director of the Company from 1953 to 1964 and from 1971 to the present, serving as Chairman since 1980. He has been Vice Chairman of Yanacocha's Executive Committee since 1992. He also has served as a director of numerous other mining and mining-related companies that are subsidiaries of the Company.our subsidiaries. He spent 17 years (1944-1952 and 1964-1971) with Cerro de Pasco Corporation, a Delaware corporation engaged in the mining business that has since been expropriated by the Peruvian government and renamed Centromín Perú, where he was in various management and executive positions involved in the exploration and geology of mines in Peru, including serving as President from 1964 to 1971. He served as President of the Privatization Comm itteeCommittee for Centromín from 1992 to 1994 and as director of theBanco Central de Reserva del Perú (the Central Reserve Bank of Peru) from 1992 to 2000. He received a B.S. degree in Engineering from theUniversidad Nacional de Ingeniería(National University of Engineering, or "UNI")UNI) in Peru in 1941 and an M.S. in Geology from Harvard University in 1944 and completed the Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Business School in 1971.

Norman Anderson, Director and member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Anderson has been a director of the Company since 1994. He is currently President of Anderson & Associates, a Canadian consulting firm. In 1991, he was elected Chairman of the Board of International Corona Corporation, a Canadian gold mining company that has since merged with a wholly owned subsidiary of Homestake Company, a U.S. mining company. From 1980 to 1986, he was Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of TCL.Teck Cominco. He was employed from 1970 to 1973 by AMAX Inc., a company that has since merged with Cyprus Minerals Company to create Cyprus Amax, and from 1953 to 1970 by TCL.Teck Cominco. He is currently a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EuroZink Mining Corporation and is a director or officer of other minor mining companies. Mr. Anderson graduated from the University of Manitoba with a B.S. in Geological Engineering in 1953.

Luis Coleridge, Director, Financial Expert, Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Mr.Coleridge was elected a director of the Company on March 29, 2000. He is presently an independent business consultant. A retired partner of Arthur Andersen & Co., Mr. Coleridge's career spanned 33 years, in which he rose to the position of Managing Partner of Peruvian operations and retired in 1997. He was also professor of accounting and auditing at theUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos ("UNMSM"), or UNMSM, and other Peruvian universities and colleges. Mr. Coleridge graduated from UNMSM with a B.S. degree in 1962 and completed post-graduate studies in Economics in 1964.

Aubrey Laurence Paverd, Director and member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Dr. Paverd is currently a private consultant based in Melbourne, Australia. He has been a director since 2002. From 1994 to 2000, he held the position of Group Executive Exploration with North Ltd., a diversified mining company with gold and base metal mines in Australia, Europe, North and South America. His career with Newmont Mining Corporation spanned 21 years. BeginningHe began as Chief Geologist of South Africa in 1973, rising through the positions of Chief Geologist at Tsumeb Corporation Ltd., Namibia, a subsidiary of Newmont, to assistant to the Vice President of Exploration in New York in 1979, Director of Foreign Exploration in 1981 and ultimately Vice President of Exploration when he left Newmont in 1994. Mr. Paverd was also a lecturer in geology at Rhodes University during 1972 and 1973 and worked as a field and mining geologist in Australia and Zambia during the period from 1962 to 1969. He received B.S. (Hons) and M.S. degree sdegrees from Rhodes University in 1961 and 1966 respectively and a Ph.D. from the University of James Cook North Queensland in 1972. Mr. Paverd is currently also a director of Randgold Resources Ltd., a London listed West African gold mining company.

Felipe Ortiz-de-Zevallos, Director and member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Ortiz has been a director since August 2003 and was named Vice Chancellor of the Company since August 2003.Universidad del Pacifico de Lima for a term from June 15, 2004 to June 15, 2009. Mr. Ortiz received a degree in Industrial Engineering from The National Engineering University in 1968, received an M.S. in Administration and Information Technology from the University of Rochester in 1970 and completed the Owner/President Management program at Harvard in 1996.

Roque Benavides Ganoza, Director, President and Chief Executive Officerand member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Benavides has been a director of the Company since July 2004 and was theour Chief Financial Officer of the Company from 1985 to February 2001, when he was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to that time, he served as Assistant to theour Chairman of the Board of the Company from 1980 to 1985 and as a Project Engineer of the Company from 1977 to 1979. Mr. Benavides also has been an alternate member of the Executive Committee of Yanacocha since 1992 and was the General Manager of Recuperada S.A., formerly aone of our majority-owned subsidiary of the Companysubsidiaries that has since merged with the Company,into us, from 1981 to 1996. He currently is serving as an executive officer of the Company and as a director of seven of theour nineteen mining and mining-related subsidiaries or affiliates of the Company.affiliates. He also has served as a director of theSocied adSociedad Nacional de Minería, Petróleo y Energía (National Association of Minerals, Petroleum and Energy) since 1988, serving as Chairman of the Board from 1993 to 1995. Mr. Benavides served as chairman of theConfederación Nacional de Instituciones Empresariales Privadas(National Confederation of Private Companies, or CONFIEP) from 1999 to March 2001. In 2001, Mr. Benavides was appointed Vice Chairman of the World Gold Council. Mr. Benavides received a B.S. in Engineering fromPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (Pontifical Catholic University of Peru) in Lima, Peru in 1977 and an M.B.A. from Henley, The Management College of Brunnel University in 1980, completed the Program for Management Development at the Harvard Business School in 1985 and the Advanced Management Program at Templeton College of Oxford University in 1997.

German Suárez Chávez, Director and member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Suárez has been a director of the Company since March 2005. Mr. Suárez is an economist who was employed by the Central Bank from 1964 to 1990. From 1979 to 1980, Mr. Suárez representedBrazil and Peru at the International Monetary Fund, ("IMF")or IMF, and from 1981 to 19801990 he served as an Official of the Ministry of Economy and Finance. Mr. Suárez served as Chairman ofBanco de la Nacion from 1990 to 1992 and Chairman of the Central Bank of Peru from 1992 to 2001. He has also served as a representative ofBanco de la Nación at Bladex, Extebandes and Arlabank, a member of the board of directors of Latin American Reserves Fund, and currently is member of the board of directors of La Pampilla Refinery, (Relapasa)or Relapasa, and Credicorp Ltd. From 1993 to 2001, he served as Governor of the IMF and AlternateAl ternate Governer of the Inter-American Development. From 2000 to 2001 Mr. Suárez served as Chairman of the IMF G-24. Mr. Suárez graduated from UNMSM with a B.S. in Economics in 1965 and received an M.A. in Economics from Columbia University in 1969.

Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Gálvez was the Deputy Manager, Finance and Information Systems, from 1985 to February 2001, when he was appointed Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer. As of March 2003, Mr. Gálvez is also an alternate member of Executive Committee of Yanacocha. He served as Deputy Manager of the Company'sour Treasury from 1980 to 1985, and as Treasurer from 1978 to 1980. Mr. Gálvez has also served as director of the Colquirrumi and Coimolache, subsidiariestwo of the Company,our subsidiaries, and was appointed director of Conenhua in 2000, director of El Brocal in 2002, director of Contacto S.A. in 2005, and an alternate member of the Executive Committee of Yanacocha in 2003. He also has served as director of theSociedad de Minería, Petróleo y Energía del Perú(Mining, Petroleum and Energy Society of Peru) since 2000. Prior to joining the Company,us, Mr. Gálvez served as Managerial Adjunct forf or Finance and Credit from 1977 to 1978 atBanco Minero del Perú (Mining Bank of Peru). He has also served as a board member of theComité de Operación Económica del Sistema Eléctrico Nacional (Committee of Economic Operation of the National Electric System). Mr. Gálvez received his B.A. in Economics from theUniversidad Nacional Federico Villarreal in 1976, his M.B.A. from the University of the Pacific in 1980 and completed the Program for Management Development at The Harvard Business School in 1997.

Raúl Benavides Ganoza, Business Development Vice President. Mr Benavides has been theour Business Development Vice President of the Company since 1992. He is also currently an alternate member of the Executive Committee of Yanacoha (1992-to date) and board member of several of the Company'sour subsidiaries. From 1984 to 1996 he was Manager of the Orcopampa mine. Prior to that time, Mr Benavides was a Manager of Operations from 1983 to 1984 and Chief of Mining from 1980 to 1983 at Colquirrumi. Since 1995, he has been a professor of mining administration atPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Mr. Benavides also has served as Vice President of theInstituto de Ingenieros de Minas (Institute of Mining Engineering) since 1994 and was also the President of theInstituto de Seguridad Minera del Perú(Mining Safety Institute of Peru) from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Benavides was a member of the Consulting Board for the National Occupational Safety Ass ociationAssociation from 2003 to 2004.200 4. Mr. Benavides received a B.S. in Mining Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1980, an M.S. in Mineral Engineering-Management from Pennsylvania State University in 1984 and completed the Advanced Management Program at The Harvard Business School in 2001.

Mario Santillán Farje, Operations Vice President. Mr. Santillán has been our manager of the Company since 1992. Prior to that time, Mr. Santillán served as our Vice Manager of Operations of the Company from 1982 to 1992, Superintendent of the Company'sour Julcani mine from 1977 to 1982, Superintendent of the Company'sour Orcopampa mine from 1974 to 1977 and Division Chief/Captain of the Company'sour Julcani mine from 1970 to 1974. From 1968 to 1970, he was Chief of Mining at Mina Yuritala, a Peruvian mining company. He is a member of theColegio de Ingenieros del Perú (Engineering Association of Peru) and is currently a director in the Executive Council of theInstituto de Ingenieros de Minas del Perú (Peruvian Institute of Mining Engineers). He received a B.S. in Mining Engineering from UNI in 1968 and also studied advanced courses in mining atPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, UNI, theUniversidad del Pac&ia cute;Pacífico (University of the Pacific) in Peru andan d the Colorado School of Mines.

José Miguel Morales Dasso, General Counsel. Mr. Morales has been our General Counsel to the Company since 1973. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Morales served as an alternate member of the Executive Committee of Yanacocha. Mr. Morales has also served as a member of the Executive Committee of Yanacocha since 1995. Mr. Morales currently serves as a director of seven of theour nineteen mining and mining-related subsidiaries or affiliates of the Company.affiliates. In addition, he has served as a director of theInstituto Nacional de Derecho de Minería y Petróleo (National Institute of Mining and Petroleum Law), serving as its President from 1989 to 1990 and as a director of theSociedad de Minería y Petróleo del Perú(Mining and Petroleum Society of Peru) since 1998, serving as its vice chairman since 2000. He has been a director of the following non-mining related companies: Almacenera del Perú S.A. from 1992, Inversiones Cosepa S.A. from 1979, Hotel Costa del Pacífico S.A. from 1994 and El Pacífico-Peruana Suiza Compañía de Seguros from 1979. Since 1973, he also has been a partner of Estudio Aurelio García Sayán-Abogados, a Lima law firm. In February 2003, Mr. Morales was elected president of the Sociedad Nacional de Minería, Petróleo y Energía (National Association of Minerals, Petroleum and Energy). On January 31, 2005, Mr. Morales ended his tenure as President ofSociedad Nacional de Minería, Petróleo y Energía and was elected on March 16, 2005 President ofConfederación Nacional de Instituciones Empresariales Privadas(National Confederation of Private Companies, or CONFIEP) until 2007. Mr. Morales received his law degree fromPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú in 1968 and completed the Sloan Program at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business in 1976.

César E. Vidal, Explorations Vice President. Mr. Vidal has been our Explorations Vice President of the Company since the beginning of 1996. Mr. Vidal also currently serves as director of El Brocal and Coimolache.From 1981 to 1987, he served as a geologist for BISA. Prior to joining the Company,us, from 1991 to 1995, he served as an independent economic geologist consultant to several mining companies, including the Company.us. From 1987 to 1991, he served as the chief geologist for Perubar S.A., a Peruvian zinc mining company. Mr. Vidal received his B.S. in Geology from UNI in 1977, a Ph.D. in Geology from the University of Liverpool in 1980 and certification as an engineering geologist in Peru from UNI in 1984. He also was a post-doctoral research fellow at theUniversität Heidelberg (the University of Heidelberg) from 1985 to 1986.

Carlos Humberto Rodríguez Calle, Comptroller. Mr. Rodríguez has served as our Comptroller of the Company since 1984 and as Secretary of the Company'sour Audit Committee. In February 2003, Mr. Rodríguez was elected asour Compliance and Ethics Officer of the Company.Officer. He also served as Comptroller at Cyanamid Peruana S.A., a Peruvian chemical and pharmaceutical company, from 1965 to 1975, and as General Accountant at Petrolera Amotape S.A., a Peruvian oil company devoted to exploration and development of oil, from 1963 to 1964. Mr. Rodríguez received his B.S. in Economic and Commercial Sciences and Accounting fromPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú in 1972. In 1988, Mr. Rodríguez obtained a degree in Management fromUniversidad de Piura.

Compensation

During the year ended December 31, 2004,2005, the aggregate amount of compensation that we paid by the Company to all directors and executive officers was approximately S/.17.1.13.2 million, including director's fees accrued in 20032004 and paid in 2004. The Company does2005. We do not disclose to itsour shareholders or otherwise make available public information as to the compensation of itsour individual directors or executive officers.

The Company hasWe have a long-term stock appreciation program, with a term of ten years once initiated, that allows certain executives to receive a cash remuneration equivalent to any excess of the market value at a future date over a stated price of a stated number of the Company'sour ADSs. This program is in effect as long as the executives are employed by the Companyus at the settlement date of the program. See Note 19(b)17(b) to the Company Financial Statements.

Board Practices

The Audit Committee

The Audit Committee, composed entirely of independent directors as defined in Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange's Listed Company Manual, is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in the appointment of independent auditors, upon delegation of such responsibility by the shareholders at the general meeting of shareholders, ("or General Meeting"),Meeting, and reviewing the scope of internal and external audits. The Audit Committee also reviews compliance with internal control systems, reviews the Company'sour annual and quarterly financial statements, reviews financial statements before their presentation to theComisión Nacional Supervisora de Empresas y Valores (National Supervisory Commission of Business and Securities, or "CONASEV")CONASEV), theBolsa de Valores de Lima (Lima Stock Exchange) and the Commission and maintains the integrity of the preparation of audits. The members of the Audit Committee are currently Messrs. Coleridge, Ortiz-de-Zevallos and S uárez.Suárez .

The Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for evaluating executive performance and approving executive compensation, including compensation of the chief executive officer and any stock option compensation plans. The members of the Compensation Committee are currently Messrs. Benavides de la Quintana, Ortiz-de-Zevallos and Suárez.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for preparing the proposals for the general meetings in respect of the composition of the Board of Directors along with the director remuneration to be approved by the shareholders, and monitoring issues and practices related to corporate governance and to propose necessary actions in respect thereof. The members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are currently Messrs. Anderson, Coleridge, Paverd, Ortiz-de-Zevallos , Benavides Ganoza and Suárez.

Employees

At December 31, 2004, the Company, together with its2005, we and our subsidiaries had 1,984 employees,1,984employees, of which 1,0891,123 were on the Company'sour payroll. In addition, the Company haswe have entered into arrangements with independent contractors, which employed 1,8082,100 persons who worked at the Company'sour operations.Although the total number of employees has decreased since December 31, 1997, the Company haswe have sought to strengthen itsour workforce by implementing a qualifications-based hiring policy and, with respect to employees working in the mines, reducing the average age of the workforce. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the average tenure of theour permanent laborers of the Company at the Julcani, Uchucchacua, Orcopampa and Recuperada mines (the only mines for which the Company haswe have long-term historical records) was approximately 18 years.

Of the Company's 1,089our 1,123 permanent employees, approximately 7063 percent are members of eight different labor unions (three unions and one labor union committee for clerical workers and three unions and one labor union committee for permanent laborers), which represent all clerical workers and laborers in collective bargaining negotiations with the Company.us. Each of the labor unions is a company-based union with an affiliation to a national union. Administrative personnel are not represented by unions. Labor relations for unionized and non-unionized employees in the Company'sour production facilities, including compensation and benefits, are governed by collective bargaining agreements, the terms and length of which are negotiated throughout the year as the various collective bargaining agreements come up for renewal. These collective bargaining agreements are typically one year in length, and set wages for the applicable period and include increases as negotiated and certain other employee benefi ts,benefits, such as overtime, bonuses and family benefits.

Compensation received by the Company'sour employees includes salary, other cash payments (such as overtime, vacation pay and bonuses including, but not limited to, high altitude and underground mining bonuses) and non-cash benefits. Non-cash benefits include medical insurance, life insurance and training programs for workers and administrative staff. For mine and processing plant workers, benefits also include transportation services, meals or food allowances, education for children of the Company'sour employees and housing, hospitals and a full range of social services for the Company'sour permanent employees and their families at townsites near itsour mines in compliance with mining regulations. The CompanyWe voluntarily providesprovide power, water and sewage services for the camp and houses of the workers as well as for certain towns nearby. In addition, pursuant to a profit-sharing plan mandated by Peruvian labor legislation, employees of mining companies in Peru are entitled to receive the Employee Profi tProfit Sharing Amount, four percent of such profitsp rofits to be distributed based on the number of days each employee worked during the preceding year and the remaining four percent of such profits to be distributed among the employees based on their relative salary levels. Effective January 1, 1997, the annual payment to each employee under the profit sharing plan cannot exceed 18 times such employee's monthly salary, and any difference between the Employee Profit Sharing Amount and the aggregate amount paid to employees must be contributed by the Companyus to theFondo Nacional de Capacitación Laboral de Promoción del Empleo (FONDO EMPLEO),a fund to be established to promote employment and employee training.

Under Peruvian law, the Companywe may dismiss workers for cause by following certain formal procedures. The CompanyWe may dismiss a worker without cause, provided that the Company payswe pay such worker a layoff indemnification in an amount equal to one and a half month's salary for each full year worked plus the pro rata portion for any uncompleted year, not to exceed in the aggregate 12 months' salary. Several decisions adopted by the Peruvian Constitutional Court, holding that an employee is entitled for reinstatement if no cause for dismissal is expressed by the employer or for failure to present evidence supporting the employer's grounds, have limited the Company'sour ability to dismiss a worker without cause. However, all employees are entitled to a severance payment upon termination of their employment, regardless of the reason for such termination, equal to one month's salary for each full year worked plus the pro rata portion for any uncompleted year. Pursuant to the Peruvian labor laws enacte denacted in 1991, the Company depositswe deposit funds for severancesevera nce payments in a bank account selected by each employee and for the benefit of such employee, in both May and November of each year.

The Company'sOur permanent employees receive the benefit of one of two types of pension arrangements. All workers can choose to enroll in the ONP or in AFPs. The Company isWe are required to withhold from each of the salaries of the employees enrolled in the ONP system approximately 13 percent of such employee's salary, and pay such amount to the ONP system and withhold from the salary of each employee enrolled in the AFP system between 11.5 percent and 12approximately 13 percent of such employee's salary, and pay such amounts to the respective AFP. The Company hasAFP (exact amount varies from one AFP to another). Additionally, for workers involved in mining and metallurgical processes, an additional 2 percent is withheld from their salaries, and we contribute an additional 2 percent to increase their pension funds. We have no liability for the performance of these pension plans. The CompanyWe also payspay to the employees of the independent contractors an amount of money sufficient to cover the employers' costs with respect to severance and pension payments.

In addition, the Company payswe pay to ES SALUD nine percent of itsour total payroll for general health services for all permanent employees. Prior to May 1997, the Company waswe were required to pay to ES SALUD one percent of itsour payroll of blue collar employees for employment-related illness and accidents, (the "Workersor the Workers Compensation Fund Payment").Payment. In addition, Law No. 26790 also requires the Companyus to provide private insurance representing an average payment equal to 1.30 percent of the payroll of covered employees for employment-related incapacity and death for blue collar employees and other employees exposed to mining-related hazards. As of December 1, 2004, the Company iswe are no longer required to pay a total of 2 percent of itsour total payroll for the Extraordinary Solidarity Tax.

The Company hasWe have not experienced any strikes during the past five years.

Share Ownership

At April 30, 2005,2006, our directors and executive officers, of the Company, as a group, owned 25,192,22825,991,703 Common Shares, representing a20.43 percent beneficial ownership of Common Shares of 18.33 percent. Theall the 127,221,164 shares outstanding. Our directors and executive officers of the Company do not own any Investment Shares.

ITEM 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

Major Shareholders

AtAs of April 30, 2005, the Company2006, we had outstanding 137,444,962 Common Shares, including 10,565,130 treasury shares, and 372,320 Investment Shares.Shares, including 30,988 treasury shares. The Common Shares are voting securities. The table below sets forth certain information concerning ownership of (i) the Common Shares and Investment Shares and (ii) the aggregate Common Shares and Investment Shares, as of April 30, 200530,2006 with respect to each shareholder known to the Companyus to own more than 2.5 percent of the outstanding Common Shares and with respect to all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

Control of the Company*

Shareholder

Number of
Common Shares

Percentage Beneficial Ownership ofCommon Shares(2)

Number of InvestmentShares

Percentage Beneficial Ownership ofInvestment Shares

Number of Common Shares
and Investment Shares

Percentage Beneficial Ownership of
Common Shares andInvestment Shares

Number of
Common Shares

Percentage Beneficial Ownership of Common Shares(2)

Number of InvestmentShares

Percentage Beneficial Ownership of Investment Shares

Number of Common Shares
and Investment Shares

Percentage Beneficial Ownership of
Common Shares and Investment Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fidelity Low prices Stock Fund

3,433,600

2.50

-

-

3,433,600

2.49

Benavides
Family(1)

36,849,869

26.81

42,128

11.32

36,891,997

26.77

37,485,198

27.28

54,489

14.64

37,539,687

27.24

Fidelity Management & Research Co.

9,775,245

7.12

-

-

9,775,245

7.10

7,837,900

5.71

-

-

7,837,900

5.69

Cia Minera Condesa S.A.

10,565,130

7.69

30,988

8.33

10,596,118

7.69

10,565,130

7.69

30,988

8.33

10,596,118

7.69

Merrill Lynch IIF-World Gold Fund

5,000,000

3.64

-

-

5,000,000

3.63

5,000,000

3.64

-

-

5,000,000

3.63

Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Ltd. (U.K.).

8,805,590

6.41

-

-

8,805,590

6.39

8,647,825

6.30

-

-

8,647,825

6.28

AFP, Nueva Vida

4,106,120

2.99

-

-

4,106,120

2.98

4,435,310

3.23

-

-

4,435,310

3.22

AFP, Integra

4,106,453

2.99

-

-

4,106,453

2.98

5,860,191

4.27

-

-

5,860,191

4.26

AFP Horizonte.

3,728,397

2.72

-

-

3,728,397

2.71

4,384,699

3.19

-

-

4,384,699

3.19

Directors and Executive
Officers as a Group

25,192,228

18.33

3,257

0.88

25,195,485

18.29

25,991,703

20.43

-

-

25,991,703

18.86

________________

(1) Includes Common Shares directly or indirectly owned by Alberto Benavides de la Quintana and certain members of his immediate and extended family and their spouses.

(2) The beneficial ownership of Common Shares adds up to more than 100 percent due to participation by certain members of the Benavides Family as Directors and/or Executive Officers of the Company.Officers.

* At April 30, 2005.2006.

As of April 30, 2005, the Company estimates2006, we estimate that 64,766,66675,166,166 ADSs are held in the United States, which represent approximately 4754.69 percent of Common Shares outstanding. The number of institutional record holders of the Company'sour Common Shares (or of ADSs representing itsour Common Shares) in the United States was fifteen19 institutions at April 30, 2005.2006.

Related Party Transactions

Except as otherwise disclosed herein, no director, senior officer, principal shareholder or any associate or affiliate thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since the beginning of the Company'sour last financial year that has materially affected the Company,us, or in any proposed transaction that would materially affect the Company.us. Except as otherwise disclosed herein, the Company haswe have entered into no transactions with parties that are not "related parties" but who would be able to negotiate terms not available on an arm's-length basis. The Company enters, fromFrom time to time in the ordinary course of business, we enter into management, exploration, mine development,construction, engineering and employment contracts with joint venture companies in which one or more of itsour direct or indirect subsidiaries holds equity or partnership interests.

Chaupiloma is the legal owner of the miningmineral rights developedoperated by Yanacocha and received a 3 percent royalty on quarterly sales, after deducting refinery and transportation costs. Royalties amounted to S/.82,350,000, S/.116,857,000and.116,857,000, S/.128,889,000 and S/.152,342,000 in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively, and are presented as royalty income in the consolidated statements of income.

Condesa received cash dividends from Yanacocha of approximately S/.83,070,000,.482,025,000, S/.482,025,000.414,911,000 and S/.414,911,000.264,034,000 in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

Cash dividends received from Cerro Verde amounted to approximately S/.4,871,000 in 2004 respectively.and S/.43,892,000 in 2005.

In March of 2002, Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A. signed a technical service agreement with Yanacocha to perform a number of specialized activities and services. Pursuant to the agreement, the services performed will be related to the construction of mining projects and will include completion of analysis and studies, work plan design, and functions related to planning, monitoring and administrating the infrastructure projects required by Yanacocha in its operations. This contract expired on December 31, 2004 and was renewed in January 2005 under the same terms. The revenues related to this service contract amounted to approximately S/.12,343,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, S/.10,176,000 for the year-endedyear ended December 31, 2004 and S/.11,408,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003.

In November 2000, Conenhua signed an agreement with Yanacocha for the construction and operation of a 220 kw transmission line between Trujillo and Cajamarca, a 60 kw transmission line between Cajamarca and La Pajuela, and the Cajamarca Norte substation; this agreement also encompassed activities necessary to enlarge the Trujillo substation. Pursuant to this contract, the construction work was completed in October 2001.Concurrently, we and Yanacocha and the Company singedsigned a 10-year agreement covering electric energy transmission and infrastructure operation beginning in November 2001. In exchange for Buenaventuraus operating and managing the transmission project, Yanacocha will pay an annual fee of US$3.7 million. The revenues for these services amounted to approximately S/.12,813,000 in 2005, S/.13,265,000 in 2004 (S/and S/.14,282,000 in 2003).2003.

Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. Financial Information

Consolidated Financial Statements

See "Item 19. Exhibits" for a list of financial statements filed under Item 18.

Other Financial Information

Legal Proceedings

Other than the legal proceeding relating to Yanacocha described in "Item 4. Information on the Company-Yanacocha-Legal Proceedings" and as described below, the Companywe and Yanacocha are each parties to certain other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its business, none of which, individually or in the aggregate, is material.

In or aboutOn March 25, 2005, the Companywe entered into a settlement of litigation filed February 2, 2002, by Patrick Maugein against Newmont Mining Corporation, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and certain affiliated corporate entities and named individuals. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, was dismissed by the district court on January 15, 2004, and was pending on appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. As a result of the settlement, on or about March 25, 2005, that appeal has beenwas dismissed with prejudice. A description of the claims brought in the lawsuit may be found in Item 8, Other Financial Information, Legal Proceedings, in the Company's Form 20-F, filed June 2, 2004.

Dividends and Dividends Policy

The CompanyWe can distribute three kinds of dividends: (i) cash dividends, which are paid out of the Company'sour net distributable income for each year, (ii) stock dividends that are akin to stock splits rather than distributions of earnings, which are issued for the purpose of adjusting the book value per share of the Company'sour stock, and (iii) stock dividends for the purpose of capitalizing profits, in each case as described in more detail below. All shares outstanding and fully paid are entitled to share equally in any dividend declared based on the portion of theour capital of the Company represented by such share. Shares of capital stock, which are only partially paid participate in a dividend or distribution in the same proportion that such shares have been paid at the time of the dividend or distribution. No cash dividend may be declared in respect of a given year unless the Company haswe have earned net distributable income in respect of such year. However, a company may declare dividends du ringduring the year. The CompanyWe may make interim provisional paymentspayme nts to shareholders in respect of net distributable income for the current fiscal year, which are referred to as "provisional dividends", as explained below.

The Board of Directors, following the end of each fiscal year, makes a recommendation to the annual obligatory shareholders' meeting regarding the amount and timing of payments, if any, to be made as dividends on the Company'sour Common Shares and Investment Shares.

The dividend policy establishes that dividends will be not less than 20 percent of the Company'sour net profits. In principle there are two kinds of dividend payments: the interim dividends which are approved by the Board and are generally paid during the fourth quarter of the year, and the final dividend payment which will be paid in accordance with the general shareholders' meeting resolutions. However, the amount and timing of such payments is subject to the final approval at such annual obligatory shareholders' meeting and Board meeting, of the Company, as well as to the availability of earnings to distribute. According to Peruvian Corporate Laws, there is an exception that permits holders of at least 20 percent of total Common Shares outstanding, require that not less than 50 percent of theour after-tax profits of the Company during the previous year and legal reserve allocation be paid out in the form of dividends.

Available earnings are subject to the following priorities. First, the mandatory employee profit sharing of eight percent of pre-tax profits (which may differ from pre-tax profits determined under Peruvian GAAP due to different depreciation treatment and different adjustments of non-taxable income and/or non-deductible expenses) is paid. Next, remaining earnings are taxed at the standard corporate income tax rate, which is 30 percent since January 1, 2004. Not less than ten percent of such after-tax net profits must then be allocated to a legal reserve, which is not available thereafter except to cover future losses or for use in future capitalizations. Amounts reserved are nevertheless included in taxable income. The obligation to fund this reserve continues until the reserve constitutes 20 percent of the paid-in share capital. In addition, the holders of Common Shares can allocate any portion of the net profits to any special reserve. The remainder of the net profits is available for dis tribution to shareholders. Any dividend approved by a shareholders' meeting of the Company after December 31, 2002 is subject to an additional withholding tax at the rate of 4.1 percent of the total amount of dividends distributed to the shareholders who either are (i) individuals, whether domiciled or non-domiciled in Peru, or (ii) a non-domiciled company or entity. Dividends paid to domiciled companies or entities are not subject to such withholding tax. If any tax or other governmental charge will become payable by Banco Wiese Sudameris of Lima Peru, as custodian, the Depositary or the Companyus with respect to any ADR or any deposited securities represented by the ADSs evidenced by such ADR, such tax or other governmental charge will be payable by the owner or beneficial owner of such ADR to the Depositary.

Dividends on issued and outstanding Common Shares and Investment Shares are distributed in accordance with the proportion of the total capital represented by such respective shares. Dividends are distributed pro rata in accordance with the number of Common Shares or Investment Shares. Accordingly, any dividend declared would be apportioned 99.73 percent to the holders of Common Shares and 0.27 percent to the holders of Investment Shares. This proportion will not change in the future except and to the extent holders of Common Shares and Investment Shares exercise their preemptive rights disproportionately in any future issuance of Common Shares and Investment Shares, or the Company issueswe issue Common Shares without preemptive rights in accordance with Article 259 of the Peruvian Companies Law.

Holders of Common Shares and Investment Shares are not entitled to interest on dividend payments.

Holders of ADRs are entitled to receive dividends with respect to the Common Shares underlying the ADSs evidenced by such ADRs, subject to the terms of the related Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, to the same extent as owners of Common Shares.

To the extent that the Company declareswe declare and payspay dividends on the Common Shares, owners of the ADSs on the relevant record date are entitled to receive the dividends payable in respect of the Common Shares underlying the ADSs, subject to the terms of the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement. Cash dividends are paid to the Depositary in Nuevos Soles and, except as otherwise described under the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, are converted by the Depositary into U.S. Dollars and paid to owners of ADRs net of currency conversion expenses. Under the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, the Depositary may, and will if the Companywe so requests,request, distribute stock dividends in the form of additional ADRs evidencing whole ADSs resulting from a dividend or free distribution of Common Shares by the Companyus received by the Depositary. Cash dividends paid with respect to the Common Shares and amounts distributed with respect to ADSs are currently subject to Peruvian withholding income tax of 4.1 percent. See "Item 10. AdditionalAd ditional Information-Taxation-Peruvian Tax Considerations".

The Company issuesWe issue stock dividends for value per share of the Company'sour stock. The book value of the Company'sour share capital is based on the nominal (par) value of each share but is adjusted to account for inflation; thus, in inflationary periods, the Company'sour book value will increase while itsthe nominal value will remain constant. In order to adjust the book value of each share to equal or approximate itsthe nominal value, the Companywe periodically issuesissue new shares that are distributed as stock dividends to each existing shareholder in proportion to such shareholder's existing holdings, unless it increases the nominal value of the existing shares. These stock dividends (which under the Peruvian income tax law are not considered dividends) do not change a stockholder's percentage of interest in the Company.us. In addition, the Companywe may from time to time capitalize profits and, in such case, it haswe have to distribute stock dividends representing the profits capitalized.

Dividends not collected within ten years will be retained by the Company,us, increasing itsour legal reserve, and the right to collect such dividends will expire.

Under Peruvian law, each company may make formal cash distributions only out of net distributable income (calculated on an individual, unconsolidated basis and demonstrated by a balance sheet at any given time). The Company,We, however, may pay provisional dividends. Payment of provisional dividends will be approved on the basis of financial statements which show the existence of net distributable income obtained during the current fiscal year. In the event that, following such an interim provisional payment, the Company sufferswe suffer a loss or if it finishes itswe finish the fiscal year with a net income that is lower than the amount of provisional dividends paid during such fiscal year, itwe could legally require all shareholders (including holders of ADRs) to return such payment to the Companyus with interest. However, it has been and continues to be the Company'sour policy not to require shareholders to return such payment of provisional dividends, but rather to cover such contingency through a "dividends paid in advance" account to be off-set by future net distributable income.

The following table sets forth the amounts of interim and final cash dividends and the aggregate of cash dividends paid with respect to the years 2000 throughyear 2001. Cash dividends with respect to these years were paid per Series A Share, Series B Share and ADS. Effective on May 3, 2002, the Companywe redesignated itsour Series B Shares and Series A Shares as Common Shares and each of the Company'sour ADSs, which previously represented two Series B Shares, represented two Common Shares. Effective November 12, 2003, the Companywe modified the ratio of the Company'sour ADSs from two Common Shares per ADS to one Common Share per ADS. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-History and Development-History-Redesignation of the Company's Shares and ADSs":

Year endedDecember 31,

Per

Series A Share(1)

Per

Series B Share(1)

Per

ADSs(1)

Per

Investment Share(1)

Per

Series A Share(1)

Per

Series B Share(1)

Per

ADSs(1)

Per

Investment Share(1)

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

2000

0.1100

0.2550

0.3650

0.1100

0.2550

0.3650

0.2200

0.5100

0.7300

0.1100

0.2550

0.3650

2001

0.1100

0.2100

0.3200

0.1100

0.2100

0.3200

0.2200

0.4200

0.6400

0.1100

0.2100

0.3200

0.1100

0.2100

0.3200

0.1100

0.2100

0.3200

0.2200

0.4200

0.6400

0.1100

0.2100

0.3200

________________

(1) Interim and final dividend amounts are expressed in nominal Nuevos Soles as of December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively.2001.

The following table sets forth the amounts of interim and final cash dividends and the aggregate of cash dividends paid with respect to the years 2002 2003 and 2004.through 2005. Dividends with respect to such yearyears were paid per Common Share and ADS.

Year endedDecember 31,

Per

Common Share

Per

ADSs

Per

Investment Share

Per

Common Share

Per

ADSs

Per

Investment Share

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

Interim

Final

Total

2002(1)

0.3202

0.303

0.6232

0.6404

0.606

1.2464

0.3202

0.3030

0.6232

0.3202

0.303

0.6232

0.6404

0.606

1.2464

0.3202

0.3030

0.6232

2003(2)

0.5453

 

0.5453

1.0906

 

1.0906

0.5453

 

0.5453

0.5453

-

0.5453

1.0906

-

1.0906

0.5453

-

0.5453

2003(2)

0.3282

0.5536

0.8818

0.3282

0.5536

0.8818

0.3282

0.5536

0.8818

0.3282

0.5536

0.8818

0.3282

0.5536

0.8818

0.3282

0.5536

0.8818

2004(3)

0.5312

0.585

1.1162

0.5312

0.585

1.1162

0.5312

0.585

1.1162

0.5312

0.585

1.1162

0.5312

0.585

1.1162

0.5312

0.585

1.1162

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005(4)

0.6102

0.7216

1.3318

0.6102

0.7216

1.3318

0.6102

0.7216

1.3318

________________

    1. Interim and final dividend amounts are expressed in nominal Nuevos Soles as of December 31, 2002.
    2. Interim and final dividend amounts are expressed in nominal Nuevos Soles as of December 31, 2003.
    3. Interim and final dividend amounts are expressed in nominal Nuevos Soles as of December 31, 2004.
    4. Interim and final dividend amounts are expressed in nominal Nuevos Soles as of December 31, 2005.

In addition to the above mentioned cash dividends, in November 2002, the Companywe distributed stock dividends, which in the aggregate were equivalent to S/.2.8 million, in the form of El Brocal shares.In August 2003, the Companywe distributed an extraordinary stock dividend as of S/.0.5453 per share.

Minority Shareholders

Law No. 28370, published on October 30, 2004, included in the Peruvian Companies Law certain provisions for the protection of the minority shareholders that were formerly contained in Law No. 26985. Pursuant to Article 262-A of the Peruvian Companies Law, the Companywe will publish within sixty days after the Annual Obligatory Shareholders Meeting the total number and value of any shares not claimed by shareholders, the name of such shareholders, the share quote in the securities market for such shares; the total amount of uncollected dividends; and where shares and dividends pending claim are available for the minority shareholders. The publication must be made in the official gazette "El Peruano" and on the Company'sour website. Article 262-B describes the procedure to request share certificates and/or dividends. Pursuant to Article 262-C, the Company iswe are required to submit to CONASEV the list of shareholders that have and have not picked-up their share certificates and/or have or have not collected their dividendsdivide nds within 60 days of the required publication in El Peruano. Article 262-F containsdescribes the procedure to solvefor handling any claim that the minority shareholders may file.file, such claims to be solved by CONASEV.

Significant Changes

No significant change in the Company'sour financial affairs has occurred since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Annual Report.

ITEM 9. The Offer and Listing

Offer and Listing Details

Not applicable.

Plan of Distribution

Not applicable.

Trading Markets

Effective on May 3, 2002, the Companywe redesignated itsour Series B Shares and Series A Shares as Common Shares. From such date, each of the Company'sour ADSs, which previously represented two Series B Shares, represented two Common Shares. Effective November 12, 2003, the Companywe modified the ratio of the Company'sour ADSs from two Common Shares per ADS to one Common Share per ADS. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-History and Development-History-Redesignation of the Company's Shares and ADSs". Accordingly, since May 3, 2002, the Common Shares and ADSs representing the Common Shares (each ADS representing two Common Shares) have been listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "BVN". In addition, the Common Shares are listed and traded on the Lima Stock Exchange. The Investment Shares have been listed and traded on the Lima Stock Exchange since 1979.

AtAs of April30 2005 and December 31, 2004,, 2006, the share capital with respect to the Common Shares was S/.549,779,848.549,779,848.00 represented by 137,444,962 shares and the share capital with respect to the Investment Shares was S/.1,489,280.1,489,280.00 represented by 372,320 shares. The Common Shares represent 100 percent of theour outstanding share capital of the Company.capital. The Investment Shares have no voting rights and are not, under Peruvian law and accounting rules, characterized as share capital. AtAs of April30 2005,, 2006, there were 1,1671,524 owners of record of the Common Shares and 1,161owners1,074owners of record of the Investment Shares.

Historical Information

The Series B Shares and the ADSs which represented the Series B Shares (each ADS represented two Series B Shares) were listed, and the ADSs were traded, on the New York Stock Exchange from May 31, 1996 until May 2, 2002, under the symbol "BVN". In addition, the Series B Shares were listed and traded on the Lima Stock Exchange from May 15, 1996 until May 2, 2002. The ADSs which represented the Series B Shares were issued under the terms of a Deposit Agreement dated May 20, 1996, among the Company,ourselves, The Bank of New York, as depositary, and the owners and beneficial owners of ADSs. The Series A Shares were listed and traded on the Lima Stock Exchange since 1971.

The creation of the Series B Shares was authorized at an extraordinary meeting of shareholders held on March 20, 1996. At that meeting, outstanding common shares were renamed as Series A Shares, and a capital increase of a new class of common shares, designated Series B Shares, was approved. On May 31, 1996, the Series B Shares began trading on the Lima Stock Exchange and on May 15, 1996, the ADSs began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. On November 26, 1997, the Companywe consummated the Series A Exchange Offer, pursuant to which itwe exchanged 32,472,952 Series A Shares for an equal number of Series B Shares. Immediately prior to the Series A Exchange Offer, there were 98,995,000 Series A Shares and 19,154,617 Series B Shares. Upon consummation of the exchange, there were 66,522,048 Series A Shares and 51,627,569 Series B Shares.

On December 10, 1998, the Companywe consummated an exchange offer pursuant to which itwe exchanged 18,666,198 Labor Shares (now known as Investment Shares) for 18,666,198 Series B Shares. On December 3, 1999, the Companywe commenced an exchange offer, pursuant to which itwe offered to exchange on a one-for-one basis, all outstanding Series A Shares and Investment Shares for itsour Series B Shares, (the "Redemptionor the Redemption and Exchange Offer").Offer. The Redemption and Exchange Offer terminated, in accordance with its terms, on January 13, 2000. As a result of the Redemption and Exchange Offer, 23,433,294 Series A Shares and 629,147 Investment Shares were tendered for redemption and/or exchange and accepted by the Companyus and were exchanged for equal numbers of Series B Shares. At December 31, 1999 (prior to the consummation of the Redemption and Exchange Offer), the share capital with respect to the Series A Shares was S/.66,522,048 represented by 66,522,048 shares; the share capital with respect to the Series B Sh aresShares was S/.70,293,767 representedrepr esented by 70,293,767 shares; and the share capital with respect to the Investment Shares was S/.1,011,467 represented by 1,001,467 shares. Following the consummation of the Redemption and Exchange Offer, the share capital with respect to the Series A Shares was S/.43,088,754 represented by 43,088,754 shares; the share capital with respect to the Series B Shares was S/.94,356,208 represented by 94,356,208 shares and the share capital with respect to the Investment Shares was S/.372,320 represented by 372,320 shares.

Trading Information

For the periods indicated prior to April 30, 2005, theThe table below sets forth the trading volume and the high and low closing prices of the Common Shares and Investment Shares in Nuevos Soles. The table also includes for the same periods the trading volume and the high and low closing prices of the ADSs representing the Common Shares in U.S. Dollars from the date after the redesignation of the Company'sour Series B Shares and Series A Shares as Common Shares on May 3, 2002. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-The Company-History and Development-History-Redesignation of the Company's Shares and ADSs":

 

Common Shares(1)

ADSs(2)

Investment Shares(1)

 

Common Shares(1)

ADSs(2)

Investment Shares(1)

 

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading

Volume

High

Low

 

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading

Volume

High

Low

 

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

(in millions)

(in US$per ADS)

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

 

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

(in millions)

(in US$per ADS)

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

Annual highs and lows

Annual highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2002 (after May 3, 2002)

8.18

50.64

31.00

51.26

30.77

20.11

0.15

35.67

22.87

2002 (after May 3, 2002)

8.18

50.64

31.00

51.26

30.77

20.11

0.15

35.67

22.87

2003

4.56

99.07

42.90

66.99

44.02

24.04

0.13

49.34

26.68

2003

4.56

99.07

42.90

66.99

44.02

24.04

0.13

49.34

26.68

2004

2.21

101.17

69.36

109.38

29.45

19.62

0.18

69.90

50.93

2004

2.21

101.17

69.36

109.38

29.45

19.62

0.18

69.90

50.93

2005

3.03

105.17

67.44

106.57

31.42

20.59

0.09

78.90

55.77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarterly highs and lows

Quarterly highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarterly highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st quarter

1.27

48.79

42.90

13.38

28.14

24.04

0.03

28.67

26.68

1st quarter

1.27

48.79

42.90

13.38

28.14

24.04

0.03

28.67

26.68

2nd quarter

1.49

51.18

46.47

11.12

29.92

26.58

0.03

29.17

27.22

2nd quarter

1.49

51.18

46.47

11.12

29.92

26.58

0.03

29.17

27.22

3rd quarter

1.15

66.66

57.87

13.80

39.17

32.87

0.03

33.84

29.01

3rd quarter

1.15

66.66

57.87

13.80

39.17

32.87

0.03

33.84

29.01

4th quarter

0.65

99.07

78.39

28.69

44.02

28.74

0.04

49.34

41.34

4th quarter

0.65

99.07

78.39

28.69

44.02

28.74

0.04

49.34

41.34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st quarter

1.28

101.17

80.67

32.97

29.45

22.89

0.06

60.75

50.93

1st quarter

1.28

101.17

80.67

32.97

29.45

22.89

0.06

60.75

50.93

2nd quarter

0.40

88.36

69.36

24.10

25.90

19.62

0.05

64.00

55.67

2nd quarter

0.40

88.36

69.36

24.10

25.90

19.62

0.05

64.00

55.67

3rd quarter

0.22

79.41

70.90

19.40

23.66

20.47

0.02

62.00

59.34

3rd quarter

0.22

79.41

70.90

19.40

23.66

20.47

0.02

62.00

59.34

4th quarter

0.31

82.80

74.43

32.91

25.41

21.32

0.05

69.90

62.70

4th quarter

0.31

82.80

74.43

32.91

25.41

21.32

0.05

69.90

62.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monthly highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January

0.09

73.18

69.60

6.77

22.67

20.75

0.01

65.65

60.00

1st quarter

0.46

76.50

68.57

25.41

23.68

20.62

0.01

64.30

62.00

February

0.17

75.55

66.00

6.98

23.35

20.01

0.01

63.62

63.00

2nd quarter

0.57

74.44

67.44

20.32

23.41

20.59

0.03

56.69

54.34

Marych

0.20

80.75

70.10

11.66

25.01

21.10

0.01

63.62

63.00

3rd quarter

1.27

87.05

76.22

24.82

27.14

23.39

0.02

61.34

55.77

April

0.17

75.50

68.90

7.34

24.00

20.82

0.02

63.00

61.00

4th quarter

0.73

105.17

86.99

36.02

31.42

25.26

0.03

78.90

75.34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monthly highs and lows

Monthly highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

November

0.21

98.50

84.70

10.69

29.65

25.13

0.01

80.70

77.00

December

0.24

109.00

93.40

11.76

32.07

26.63

0.01

78.00

75.00

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January

0.36

106.50

86.51

20.13

31.34

25.88

0.01

74.00

73.00

February

0.20

92.00

82.00

12.08

28.24

24.43

0.01

73.00

March

0.28

95.00

77.12

17.54

27.50

22.81

0.02

75.00

73.00

April

0.18

100.00

81.00

18.10

30.50

24.22

0.00

76.00

75.00

_______________

(1) Source: Lima Stock Exchange

(2) Source: Bloomberg

(3) Information for the month of May provided from May 1, 2002.


For the periods indicated prior to May 3, 2002, the table below sets forth the trading volume and the high and low closing prices of the Series A Shares, Series B Shares and Investment Shares in Nuevos Soles. The table also includes for the same periods the trading volume and the high and low closing prices of the ADSs representing the Series B Shares in U.S. Dollars. During 2000 and 2001, the Series A Shares were traded on the Lima Stock Exchange on approximately 54.80 percent and 0.71 percent, respectively, and the Series B Shares on approximately 27.92 percent and 20.36 percent, respectively, of each respective year's trading days, and the Investment Shares were traded on the Lima Stock Exchange on approximately zero percent and 18.83 percent of each respective year's trading days. The following information is not restated in constant Nuevos Soles:

 

Series A Shares(1)

Series B Shares(1)

ADSs(2)

Investment Shares(1)

 

Series A Shares(1)

Series B Shares(1)

ADSs(2)

Investment Shares(1)

 

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading

Volume

High

Low

 

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading  Volume

High

Low

Trading

Volume

High

Low

 

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

(in millions)

(in US$per ADS)

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

 

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

(in millions)

(in US$per ADS)

(in millions)

(in nominal

S/. per share)

Annual highs and lows

Annual highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2000

23.61

33.67

20.25

26.34

34.93

20.29

17.63

22.25

10.37

0.68

25.71

20.90

2001

0.30

28.17

22.67

19.20

36.15

24.23

29.25

21.16

13.68

0.06

26.44

18.80

2002 (prior to May 3, 2002)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2001

0.30

28.17

22.67

19.20

36.15

24.23

29.25

21.16

13.68

0.06

26.44

18.80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarterly highs and lows

Quarterly highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarterly highs and lows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st quarter \

0.05

24.66

22.67

5.96

28.26

24.23

5.90

16.23

13.68

0.01

22.83

20.95

1st quarter \

0.05

24.66

22.67

5.96

28.26

24.23

5.90

16.23

13.68

0.01

22.83

20.95

2nd quarter

0.13

25.85

23.99

3.88

30.87

27.21

7.67

17.80

14.96

0.01

23.58

22.66

2nd quarter

0.13

25.85

23.99

3.88

30.87

27.21

7.67

17.80

14.96

0.01

23.58

22.66

3rd quarter

0.06

28.17

26.66

6.03

35.18

30.11

8.93

20.31

17.11

0.03

26.44

22.85

3rd quarter

0.06

28.17

26.66

6.03

35.18

30.11

8.93

20.31

17.11

0.03

26.44

22.85

4th quarter

0.06

26.83

25.12

3.33

36.15

31.65

6.75

21.16

18.27

0.01

20.93

18.80

4th quarter

0.06

26.83

25.12

3.33

36.15

31.65

6.75

21.16

18.27

0.01

20.93

18.80

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st quarter

0.18

37.47

31.00

3.78

44.69

37.69

11.74

26.12

21.79

0.04

30.86

22.87

1st quarter

0.18

37.47

31.00

3.78

44.69

37.69

11.74

26.12

21.79

0.04

30.86

22.87

2nd quarter (through May 3, 2002)

0.25

46.87

45.48

1.34

47.50

45.94

13.96

30.77

25.68

0.05

35.67

31.51

2nd quarter (through May 3, 2002)

0.25

46.87

45.48

1.34

47.50

45.94

13.96

30.77

25.68

0.05

35.67

31.51

_______________

(1) Source: Lima Stock Exchange

(2) Source: The New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

Selling Shareholders

Not applicable.

Dilution

Not applicable.

ITEM 10. Additional Information

Share Capital

Not applicable.

Memorandum and Articles of Association

Organization and Register

The Company wasWe were formed on September 7, 1953 by public deed as a Peruviansociedad anónima.However, in May of 1998, the Companyour By-laws were changed to conform with the new Peruvian Companies Law. The term of existence is indefinite and itsour principal place of business is Lima, Peru.

The Company isWe are managed by the General Meeting, the Board of Directors and the management.

Objectives and Purposes

TheOur legal purpose of the Company is to engage in mining operations and related activities either directly or through majority-owned subsidiaries and controlled companies. Likewise, itwe may hold shares of companies performing mining operations.

Directors

The Board of Directors, which must be comprised byof seven members, is elected at the Annual Obligatory Meeting. Any changes in the Board of Directors require the approval of the shareholders. The removal of the Board of Directors must be approved at a shareholders' meeting, attended by holders of 75 percent of the Common Shares in the first summons and 70 percent of the Common Shares in the second summons, by resolution approved by, at least, two thirds of the total number of Common Shares outstanding. In the case of resignation of Directors, the Board of Directors may appoint substitute Directors who will serve until the next shareholders' meeting.

Directors are elected as a group for a term of three years and may be reelected indefinitely. Pursuant to Article 29 of the Companyour By-laws, Directors are not required to be shareholders of the Company.shareholders. The Board of Directors, in theirits first meeting after the Annual Obligatory Meeting that elects them,during which elections are held, must choose from among its members a Chairman and a Vice Chairman. The Peruvian Companies Law requires that all companies (sociedades anónimas) provide for the representation of minority shareholders on their Boards of Directors. To that effect, each of our Common Share of the CompanyShares gives the holder the right to as many votes as there are directors to be elected. Each holder may pool his votes in favor of one person or distribute them among various persons. Those candidates for the Board who receive the most votes are elected directors.

The Board of Directors meets when called by the Chairman of the Board, who is appointed by the Board. The Board of Directors is validly convened when all Directors are present and unanimously agree to carry out the meeting for the purpose of transacting the business that has been proposed. Pursuant to article 177 of the Peruvian Companies Law, Directors may be jointly and severally liable to us, the shareholders and third parties for their actions if they act with willful misconduct, gross negligence or abuse their powers.

The CompanyOur By-laws do not contain any provisions related to a director's power to vote on matters in which the director is materially interested. However, Article 180 of the Peruvian Companies Law requires a director with an interest that conflicts with thatan interest of the Companyours on a specific matter to disclose such interest to the Companyus and abstain from participating in the deliberation and decision of the said matter. A director that contravenes such requirement is liable for the damages suffered by the Companyus and can be removed by the Board of Directors or a shareholders' meeting upon the request of any shareholder or any member of the Board.

The CompanyOur By-laws also do not contain any provisions with respect to the power of the Directors to vote upon matters relating to their own compensation. Nevertheless, Article 30 of the Company By-laws requires that the Board of Directors receive compensation of no more than 4 percent of the profits of each fiscal year after making deductions for workers' profit sharing, taxes, reinvestment of profits for tax benefits and legal reserves. This amount will be submitted for ratification by the General Meeting during the annual obligatory meeting, at which time it approves the balance sheet, taxes, reinvestment of profits for tax benefits and legal reserves.

The CompanyOur By-laws contain no provision relating to the directors' power to borrow from the Company.us. However, Article 179 of the Peruvian Companies Law provides that directors of a company may enter into an agreement with such company only in the event that the agreement relates to operations the company performs in the regular course of business.business and in an arms-length transaction. Further, a company may provide a loan to a director or grant securities in his favor only in connection with operations that the company usually performs with third parties. Agreements, credits, loans or guarantees that do not meet the requirements set forth above require prior approval from at least two thirds of the members of the company's Board of Directors. Directors are jointly liable to the company and the company's creditors for contracts, credit, loans or securities executed or granted without complying with Article 179 of the Peruvian Companies Law.

Neither the Companyour By-laws nor the Peruvian Companies Law contain age limit requirements for the retirement or non-retirement of directors.

Shares and Voting Rights

The Company hasWe have two classes of shares, the Common Shares and the Investment Shares. The Common Shares represent 100 percent of theour outstanding share capital of the Company.capital. The Investment Shares have no voting rights and are not, under Peruvian law and accounting rules, characterized as share capital.

Holders of Common Shares are entitled to one vote per share, with the exception of the election of the Board of Directors, where each such holder is entitled to one vote per share per nominee. Each holder's votes may be cast all for a single nominee or distributed among the nominees at the holder's discretion. Holders of Common Shares may attend and vote at shareholder meetings either in person or through a proxy. Additionally, holders of Common Shares have the right to participate in the distribution of dividends and shareholder equity resulting from liquidation. The CompanyOur By-laws do not establish a maximum time limit for the payment of the dividends. However, according to Article 232 of the Peruvian Companies Law, the right to collect past-due dividends in the case of public companies that aresociedades anónimas abiertas, as is the Company,we are, expires at 10 years from the date on which the payment was due in accordance with the dividend declaration.

The Company'sOur share capital may be increased by holders of Common Shares at a shareholder meeting. Capital reductions may be voluntary or mandatory and must be approved by holders of Common Shares at a shareholder meeting. Capital reductions are mandatory when accumulated losses exceed 50 percent of capital to the extent such accumulated losses are not off-set by accumulated earnings and capital increases within the following fiscal year. Capital increases and reductions must be communicated to CONASEV, the Lima Stock Exchange and theSuperintendencia Nacional de Administración Tributaria (SUNAT) and published in the official gazette El Peruano and in a widely circulated newspaper in the city in which the Company iswe are located.

The Investment Shares do not represent the Company'sour stock obligations. Holders of Investment Shares are neither entitled to exercise voting rights nor to participate in shareholder meetings. However, Investment Shares confer upon the holders thereof the right to participate in the dividends distributed according to their nominal value, in the same manner as Common Shares.

Changes in the Rights of Shareholders

The CompanyOur By-laws do not contain special provisions relating to actions necessary to change the rights of holders of the classes of shares. However, Article 88 of the Peruvian Companies Law establishes that all shares of a same class must have the same rights and obligations, and that in the event that the Company decideswe decide to establish different rights and obligations itwe must create a different class of shares, which creation will be agreed upon by the General Meeting in accordance with the requirements for modification of the Company By-laws. The Common Shares are the only class of shares representing the 100 percent of our share capital, of the Company and, therefore, each share has the same rights and obligations of each other share. These requirements are described under "-Shares and Voting Rights" above.

The rights of any class of shares may not be reduced except in accordance with the Peruvian Companies Law.

Shareholders' Meetings

Pursuant to Peruvian law and the Companyour By-Laws, the Annual Obligatory Meeting must be held during the three-month period after the end of each fiscal year. Additional General Meetings may be held during the year.Because the Company iswe are asociedad anónima abierta, it iswe are subject to the special control of CONASEV, as provided in Article 253 of the Peruvian Companies Law.If the Company doeswe do not hold the Annual Obligatory Meeting during the three-month period after the end of each fiscal year or any other shareholder meeting required by the Peruvian Companies Law or the Companyour By-Laws, CONASEV will directly, or at the request of at least one shareholder of the Common Shares, call for such a meeting, which will take place in a reasonable period of time. Other shareholder meetings are convened by the Board of Directors when deemed convenient for the Companyus or when it is requested by the holders of at least five percent of the Common Shares. If, at the request of holders of five percent of the Common Shares, the shareholder meeting is not convened by the Board of Directors within 15 business days of the receipt of such request, CONASEV will call for such meeting. In CONASEV calls for a shareholders meeting, CONASEV will indicate the place, time and hour of the meeting, the agenda and the person who will preside. If it is a meeting other than the Annual Obligatory Meeting or a shareholder meeting required by the Peruvian Companies law or the Company By-Laws, the agenda will contain those matters requested by the shareholders who requested the meeting. Resolución CONASEV No. 111-2003-EF-94.10 as amended by Resolución CONASEV No. 015-2005-EF/94.10 approved provisions related to the right of the minority shareholders to obtain information regarding asociedad anónima abiertasuch as the Companyus and to request CONASEV to call a shareholders meeting if it is not called by thesociedad anónima abierta upon request. Notwithstanding the notice requirements as described in the preced ingp receding two sentences, any shareholder meeting will be deemed called and legally installed, provided that the shareholders representing all of the voting shares are present, and provided that every present shareholder, whether or not such shareholder has paid the full price of such shareholder's shares, agrees to hold the shareholder meeting and accepts the business to be discussed therein. Holders of Investment Shares have no right to request the Board to convene shareholder meetings.

Since the Company iswe are asociedad anónima abierta, notice of shareholders' meetings must be given by publication of a notice, with the publication occurring at least 25 days prior to any shareholders' meeting, in El Peruano and in a widely circulated newspaper in the city in which the Company iswe are located. The notice requirement may be waived at the shareholder meeting by holders of 100 percent of the outstanding Common Shares. According to Article 25 of the Company By-Laws and Article 257 of the Peruvian Companies Law, shareholder meetings called for the purpose of considering a capital increase or decrease, the issuance of obligations, a change in the Company By-Laws, the sale in a single act of assets with an accounting value that exceeds 50 percent of theour capital stock, of the Company, thea merger, division, reorganization, transformation or dissolution, of the Company, are subject to a first, second and third quorum call, each of the second and third quorum to occur upon the fa ilurefailure of the preceding one. A quorum for the first call requires the presence of shareholders holding 50 percent of theour total voting shares of the Company.shares. For the second call, the presence of shareholders holding at least 25 percent of theour total voting shares of the Company constitutes a quorum, and for the third call there is no quorum requirement. These decisions require the approval of the majority of the voting shares represented at the shareholder meeting. General Meetings convened to consider all other matters are subject to a first and second quorum call, the second quorum call to occur upon the failure of the first quorum.

In the case of shareholder meetings called for the purpose of considering the removal of members of the Board of Directors, at least 75 percent and 70 percent of the total number of Common Shares outstanding are required to be represented at the shareholder meeting on the first quorum call and second quorum call respectively. Provided such quorum is attained, the affirmative vote of no less than two thirds of the total number of Common Shares outstanding is required to effect the removal of members of the Board of Directors. The special quorum and voting requirements described above cannot be modified at a shareholder meeting called for the purpose of considering the removal of members of the Board of Directors.

Under the Companyour By-Laws, the following actions are to be taken at the annual obligatory shareholders' meetings: approval of the Company'sour balance sheets, profit and loss statements and annual reports; approval of management performance; allocation of profits; election of external auditors; election of the members of the Board of Directors; and any other matters submitted by the Board of Directors. The following actions are to be taken at the same annual shareholders' meetings if the quorum and majority requirements are met or at any other shareholders' meeting: any amendment of the Company By-Laws; any decision to increase or reduce capital; any decision to issue debt; initiating investigations or requesting auditor's reports; liquidating, the Company or merging, consolidating, dissolving, or changing itsour business form or structure.

In accordance with Article 21 of the Company By-laws, only those holders of Common Shares whose names are inscribed in the Share Register not less than 10 days in advance of a meeting will be entitled to attend shareholder meetings and to exercise their rights.

Limitations on the Rights of Nonresident or Foreign Shareholders

There are no limitations in the Companyour By-laws or the Peruvian Companies Law on the rights of nonresident or foreign shareholders to own securities or exercise voting rights on the securities of the Company.our securities.

Change in Control

There are no provisions in the Companyour By-laws that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company.control.

Disclosure of Share Holdings

There are no provisions in the Companyour By-laws governing the ownership threshold above which shareholdershare ownership must be disclosed. However, according to Regulation No. 630-97-EF/94.10009-2006-EF.94.10 of the CONASEV, which became effective on May 3, 2006, when a personan individual or financial group acquires, in one act or various successive acts, a significant percentage considered significant (more than 25 percent) of the shares with voting rightsshares of a company, it is necessary to follow a special procedure called anknown asOferta Pública de Adquisición, or Takeover Bid, thatmust be followed. This has the effect of alerting the other shareholders and the market that a personan individual or financial group has acquired a significant percentage of a company's voting shares.shares, and gives other shareholders the opportunity to sell their shares at the price offered by the purchaser. In addition, the Company must inform CONASEV and the Lima Stock Exchange must be notified of any transfer of more than 5 percent of paid-in-capital of the Company.our paid-in-capital.

Changes in the Capital

The CompanyOur By-laws do not establish special conditions for increases or reductions of capital that are more stringent than is required by the Peruvian Companies Law. Furthermore, the Peruvian Companies Law forbidssociedades anónimas abiertas, such as the Company,us, from including in their by-laws stipulations limiting the transfer of their shares or restraining their trading in other ways.

Corporate Governance

In November 2003, the Commission approved changes to the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards related to the corporate governance practices of listed companies. Under these rules, listed foreign private issuers, like the Company,us, must disclose any significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from those followed by United States domestic companies under the New York Stock Exchange, ("NYSE")or NYSE, listing standards.

There are significant differences in the corporate governance practices followed by the Companyus as compared to those followed by United States domestic companies under the NYSE's listing standards. The NYSE listing standards provide that the board of directors of a United States domestic listed company must consist of a majority of independent directors and that certain committees must consist solely of independent directors. Under Peruvian corporate governance practices, a Peruvian company is not required to have a majority of the members of the board of directors be independent.

The listing standards for the NYSE also require that United States domestic companies have an audit committee, a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee. Each of these committees must consist solely of independent directors and must have a written charter that addresses certain matters specified in the listing standards. Peruvian corporate governance practices permit the Board of Directors of a Peruvian company to form special governance bodies in accordance with the needs of such company and does not require that these special governance bodies be composed partially or entirely of independent directors. Buenaventura maintainsWe maintain three committees, which include the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. TheOur Board of Directors of Buenaventura has determined that Buenaventura'sour Audit Committee is composed entirely of independent directors, as defined in the NYSE's Listed Company Manual.

The NYSE's listing standards also require United States domestic companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. In July 2002, CONASEV and a committee composed by regulatory agencies and associations prepared and published a list of suggested corporate governance guidelines called "Principles of Good Governance for Peruvian Companies." These principles are disclosed on Conasev web page:page http://www.conasev.gob.pe. The Company'sOur code of business conduct and ethics establishes the Company'sour principles of good corporate governance and, as indicated in "Item 16B. Code of Ethics," is posted on the Company'sour website.

Material Contracts

On March 16, 2005, the Company,we, along with Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Corporation, Summit Global Management B.V., Phelps Dodge Corporation, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Cyprus Metals Company, Cyprus Climax Metals Company and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. enteredinto, entered into a participation agreement, (the "Participation Agreement")or the Participation Agreement, whereby, subject to certain closing conditions, the Companywe agreed to increase itsour ownership interest in Cerro Verde up to 20.1 percent and Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Corporation and Summit Global Management B.V. (the "Sumitomo Group"), or the Sumitomo Group, agreed to acquire an ownership interest in Cerro Verde of between 21.0 and 24.99 percent in connection with a US$850 million expansion of the Cerro Verde operation to mine a primary sulfide ore body. Phelps Dodge will retainOn June 1, 2005, Cerro Verde conducted a majoritycapital increase whereby we subscribed 42,925,975 shares, increasing our interest in Cerro Verde.Verde from 9.17 percent to 18.21 percent and Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. and Sumi tomo Corporation acquired equity positions in Cerro Verde intends to effect an increase in the Company's and the Sumitomo Group's ownership interests pursuant to three capital increases for an aggregate of 122,746,713 shares.totaling 21 percent. The Company expects to invest, from internally generated funds, up to approximately US$175 millionin Cerro Verde, which will partially finance the expansion of the Cerro Verde operation. Actual ownership percentages are contingent upon the number ofremaining minority shareholders who own shares7.2 percent of Cerro Verde which arethrough shares publicly traded on the Lima Stock Exchange. As a result of the transaction, Cerro Verde received cash totaling US$441.8 million and Phelps Dodge's interest in Cerro Verde was reduced to 53.6 percent from 82.5 percent. Since that time, we purchased additional common shares on the Lima Stock Exchange, and currently own 18.5 percent of Cerro Verde.

On September 30, 2005, Cerro Verde obtained debt financing facilities in the overall amount of US$450 million, subject to certain conditions for the expansion. The Participation Agreementabove-mentioned cash invested by the Sumitomo Group and us to establish or increase ownership interest in Cerro Verde is also a major source of funds for the expansion. Approximately US$300 million has been filed as Exhibit 4.1spent on the Cerro Verde expansion. The current copper production at Cerro Verde is approximately 100,000 tons per year of copper cathode. After completion of the expansion, copper production is expected to this Annual Report.be approximately 300,000 tons per year.

Effective December 30, 2005 and January 2, 2006, we acquired 50 percent and 25 percent, respectively, of the capital stock of Minas Poracota S.A., or Minas Poracota, for a purchase price of US$4.5 million. According to the shareholders agreement we executed with Teck Cominco Perú S.A., or Teck Cominco, if a preliminary study to be carried out by us and Teck Cominco indicates a probability of gold production that is greater than 300,000 ounces per year, Teck Cominco will have the right to increase its equity interest in Minas Poracota to 50 percent and operate the project. Teck Cominco will prepare a feasibility study with a production of 300,000 ounces of gold. However, if the preliminary study indicates that gold production is less than 300,000 ounces per year, we have the option to purchase the remaining 25 percent of the capital stock of Minas Poracota for US$2.25 million.

Exchange Controls

Since August 1990, there have been no exchange controls in Peru and all foreign exchange transactions are based on free market exchange rates. Prior to August 1990, the Peruvian foreign exchange market consisted of several alternative exchange rates. Additionally, during the last two decades, the Peruvian currency has experienced a significant number of large devaluations, and Peru has consequently adopted, and operated under, various exchange rate control practices and exchange rate determination policies, ranging from strict control over exchange rates to market determination of rates. Current Peruvian regulations on foreign investment allow the foreign holders of equity shares of Peruvian companies to receive and repatriate 100 percent of the cash dividends distributed by such companies. Such investors are allowed to purchase foreign exchange at free market currency rates through any member of the Peruvian banking system and transfer such foreign currency outside Peru with out restriction.

Taxation

The following summarizes the material Peruvian and United States tax consequences under present law of the purchase, ownership and disposition of ADSs or Common Shares. The discussion is not a full description of all tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase ADSs or Common Shares. In particular, this discussion deals only with holders that hold ADSs or Common Shares as capital assets and that have the U.S. Dollar as their functional currency. The summary does not address the tax treatment of certain investors that may be subject to special tax rules, such as banks, securities dealers, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, persons that will hold ADSs or Common Shares as a position in a "straddle" or "conversion transaction" for tax purposes and holders of ten percent or more of theour voting shares of the Company.shares. There is no tax treaty currently in effect between Peru and the United States, except for a treaty to exchange tax information. The information to be exchanged is definedde fined in such treaty as any data or declaration that may be relevant or essential to the administration and application of taxes. Accordingly, the discussions below of Peruvian and U.S. tax considerations are based on the domestic law of each of Peru and the United States which are subject to change and possibly with retroactive effect.

As used herein, "Peruvian holder" means an owner of ADSs or Common Shares that is (i) an individual domiciled in Peru, (ii) a business entity created under the laws of Peru, or (iii) a Peruvian branch, agency or permanent establishment of a non-Peruvian individual or entity. "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of ADSs or Common Shares that is (i) a United States citizen or resident, (ii) a domestic corporation or partnership, (iii) a trust subject to the control of a U.S. fiduciary and the primary supervision of a U.S. court or (iv) estate the income of which is subject to United States Federal income taxation regardless of its source.

Peruvian Tax Considerations

Cash Dividends and Other Distributions

Cash dividends paid with respect to the Common Shares and amounts distributed with respect to ADSs are currently subject to Peruvian withholding income tax, at a rate of 4.1 percent of the dividend paid, when the dividend is paid to shareholders that are: (i) individuals, whether domiciled or non-domiciled in Peru or (ii) non-domiciled companies or entities. Distributions of additional Common Shares representing profits, distribution of shares which are not distribution of earnings or profits, as well as distribution of preemptive rights with respect to Common Shares that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders of the Company generally will not be subject to Peruvian income or withholding taxes.

Capital Gains

Pursuant to Article 19, paragraph l, item 1, of the Peruvian Income Tax Law, as amended by Legislative Decree 945 effective since January 1, 2004, capital gains resulting from the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Common Shares are exempted from Peruvian income tax if (i) in the case of individuals, the transaction is effecteffected on or before December 31, 2006; and (ii) in the case of shareholders other than individuals, the transaction is effected on a Peruvian stock exchange (floor session) on or before December 31, 2006.Legislative Decree 945 also amended Article 2 of the Peruvian Income Tax Law to define: (i) capital gains as any revenue coming from the sale of capital assets; and (ii) capital assets as those assets whose purpose is not to be traded in the regular course of business of the owner of the assets. This definition of capital gains could imply that the gains effected from the sale or disposition o fof Common Shares on the Peruvian stock exchange (floor session) are not exempted from Peruvian income tax if such Common Shares are deemed not to be capital assets as defined in Article 2 of the Preuvian Income Tax Law. However, Article 2 of the Peruvian Income Tax Law also provides that the sale of shares and similar securities is an operation which produces capital gains. Therefore, capital gains resulting from the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Common Shares are exempted from Peruvian income tax if the seller is an individual and the transaction is effected on or before December 31, 2006 or, if the seller is not an individual, the transaction is effected on a Peruvian stock exchange (floor session) on or before December 31, 2006. There is no assurance that this exemption will be extended beyond December 31, 2006.

An entity organized in Peru will be subject to Peruvian tax on capital gains from sales of Common Shares after December 31, 2006 or from any sale on or before such date not effected on a Peruvian stock exchange. In addition, if Common shares sold or disposed of on a Peruvian stock exchange are deemed not to be capital assets, they will not produce capital gainsfor purposes of enjoying the exemption described above. The amount of any taxable capital gain will be the excess of the sale price of the Common Shares over the price of Common Shares when acquired by the holder adjusted by the effects of inflation.holder.

An individual holder will be taxed on capital gains from the sale or other disposition of Common Shares only if (a) such individual (i) in the case of an individual domiciled in Peru, "customarily transacts in shares or other securities" or (ii) in the case of an individual not domiciled in Peru, "customarily transacts in shares issued by Peruvian companies" and (b) the sale of such shares (i) is made on or before December 31, 2006 and is not effected on a Peruvian stock exchange or (ii) is effected after December 31,2006, unless the first paragraph of Article 2 of the Peruvian Income Tax Law, as amended by Legislative Decree 945, is interpreted to deem that Common Shares are not capital assets and therefore they do not produce capital gains for purposes of enjoying the exemption described above. For this purpose, an individual "customarily transacts in shares or other securities" if such p erson makes at least ten purchases and at least ten sales of shares or other securities during the taxable year, and an individual "customarily transacts in shares issued by Peruvian companies" if such person makes at least ten purchases and at least ten sales of shares issued by Peruvian companies during the taxable year. The amount of any taxable gain will be the excess of the sale price of the Common Shares over the price of Common Shares when acquired by the holder.

Individuals and entities who are not domiciled in Peru, as well as Peruvian agencies, branches or other permanent establishments of individuals or entities not otherwise domiciled in Peru, will not be subject to Peruvian tax on capital gains from the sale or disposition of ADSs, whether effected on a Peruvian Stock Exchange or elsewhere, nor from the deposit or withdrawal of Common Shares in exchange for ADSs effected through a Peruvian Stock Exchange. For Peruvian tax purposes domicile would, in general, be indicated by a permanent business presence in Peru.

Other Considerations

No Peruvian estate or gift taxes are imposed on the gratuitous transfer of ADSs or Common Shares. No stamp, transfer or similar tax applies to any transfer of Common Shares, except for commissions payable by seller and buyer to the Lima Stock Exchange (0.15 percent of value sold), fees payable to CONASEV (0.05 percent of value sold), brokers' fees (about 0.05 percent to 1 percent of value sold) and added taxes (at the rate of 19 percent) on commissions and fees. Any investor who sells its Common Shares on the Lima Stock Exchange will incur these fees and taxes upon purchase and sale of the Common Shares.

United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

Assuming the obligations contemplated by the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement are being performed in accordance with its terms, holders of ADSs (or ADRs evidencing ADSs) generally will be treated for United States federal income tax purposes as the owners of the Common Shares represented by those ADSs.

Cash Dividends and Other Distributions

Cash dividends paid with respect to Common Shares or Common Shares represented by ADSs generally are includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary income. Dividends generally are treated as foreign source income. Dividends paid to a U.S. Holder that is a corporation are not eligible for the dividends received deduction available to corporations. New tax legislation signed into law on May 28, 2003, and amended by legislation signed into law on May 17, 2006, provides for a maximum 15 percent U.S. tax rate on the dividend income of an individual U.S. holder with respect to dividends paid by a domestic corporation or "qualified foreign corporation" if certain holding period requirements are met. A qualified foreign corporation generally includes a foreign corporation if (i) its shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S. or (ii) it is eligible for benefits under a comprehensive US income tax treaty. Clause (i) will apply with respect to ADSs if such ADSs are readily tradeabletradable on an established securitie ssecurities market in the U.S. The ADSs are traded on the New York Stock Exchange. As a result, the Company believes itwe believe that we should be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to payouts to itsour ADS holders and, therefore, dividends paid to an individual U.S. holder with respect to ADSs should be taxed at a maximum rate of 15 percent. The maximum 15 percent tax rate is effective with respect to dividends included in income during the period beginning on or after January 1, 2003, and ending December 31, 2008.2010. Dividends paid in Nuevos Soles are includible in a United States dollar amount based on the exchange rate in effect on the date of receipt (which, in the case of ADSs, will be the date of receipt by the Depositary) whether or not the payment is converted into U.S. Dollars at that time. Any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale or conversion of the Nuevos Soles for a different amount of U.S. Dollars will be United States source ordinary income or loss. Distributions to U.S. Holders of additional C ommonCommon Shares or preemptive rights with respect to Common Shares that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders of the Companyour shareholders generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax but in other circumstances may constitute a taxable dividend.

A U.S. Holder will be entitled to a foreign tax credit for Peruvian taxes imposed by withholding taxes that are imposed,or otherwise, subject to generally applicable limitations and restrictions. In the case of U.S. individuals for whom the reduced rate of tax on dividends applies, such limitations and restrictions will appropriately take into account the rate differential under rules similar to section 904(b)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding their application to the particular circumstances of such holder.

A non-U.S. Holder generally is not subject to United States Federal income or withholding tax on dividends paid with respect to Common Shares or Common Shares represented by ADSs, unless such income is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business within the United States.

Capital Gains

U.S. Holders will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Common Shares (or preemptive rights with respect to such shares) held by the U.S. Holder or by the Depositary. U.S. Holders will not recognize gain or loss on deposits or withdrawals of Common Shares in exchange for ADSs or on the exercise of preemptive rights. Any gain recognized by a U.S. Holder generally will be treated as United States source income. Consequently, in the case of a disposition of Common Shares (which, unlikeor ADSs in a disposition of ADRs, may be taxable in Peru),transaction subject to Peruvian tax, the U.S. Holder may not be able to claim the foreign tax credit for any Peruvian tax imposed on the gain unless it has sufficient foreign source income from other sources against which it can apply the credit. Generally, gain ofor loss will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder's holding period for such Common Shares or ADSs exceeds one year. Long-term capital gain for an individual U.S. Holder is generally s ubjectsubject to a reducedr educed rate of tax. With respect to sales occurring on or after May 6, 2003, but before January 1, 2009,2011, the long-term capital gain tax rate for an individual U.S. Holder is 15 percent. For sales occurring before May 6, 2003, or after December 31, 2008,2010, under current law the long-term capital gain rate for an individual U.S. Holder is 20 percent.

A non-U.S. Holder of ADSs or Common Shares will not be subject to United States income or withholding tax on gain from the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Common Shares unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States or (ii) the non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for at least 183 days during the taxable year of the disposition and certain other conditions are met.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

The Company believes it isWe believe that we are not and will not become a passive foreign investment company for United States Federal income tax purposes. A foreign corporation is a passive foreign investment company, (a "PFIC")or PFIC, in any taxable year in which, after taking into account the income and assets of certain subsidiaries pursuant to the applicable look-through rules, either (i) at least 75 percent of its gross income is passive income or (ii) at least 50 percent of the average value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income.

If the Companywe were a PFIC in any year during which a U.S. Holder owned ADSs or Common Shares, the Companywe would not be treated as a "qualified foreign corporation" for purposes of qualifying dividends paid to a U.S. Holder for the preferential 15 percent maximum U.S. tax rate noted above and the U.S. Holder would be subject to additional taxes on any excess distributions received from the Companyus and any gain realized from the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Common Shares (regardless of whether the Companywe continued to be a PFIC). A U.S. Holder has an excess distribution to the extent that distributions on ADSs or Common Shares during a taxable year exceed 125 percent of the average amount received during the three preceding taxable years (or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder's holding period for the ADSs or Common Shares). To compute the tax on an excess distribution or any gain, (i) the excess distribution or the gain is allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder's holding period for the AD SsADSs or Common Shares, (ii) the amount allocated to the current taxable year is taxed as ordinary income and (iii) the amount allocated to other taxable years is taxed at the highest applicable marginal rate in effect for each year and an interest charge is imposed to recover the deemed benefit from the deferred payment of the tax attributable to each year.

If the Companywe were a PFIC, U.S. holders of interests in a holder of ADSs or Common Shares may be treated as indirect holders of their proportionate share of the ADSs or Common Shares and may be taxed on their proportionate share of any excess distribution or gain attributable to the ADSs or Common Shares. An indirect holder also must treat an appropriate portion of its gain on the sale or disposition of its interest in the actual holder as gain on the sale of the ADSs or Common Shares.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Dividends in respect of the ADSs or Common Shares and the proceeds from the sale, exchange, or redemption of the ADSs or Common Shares may be reported to the United States Internal Revenue Service and a backup withholding tax may apply to such amounts unless the holder (i) is a domestic corporation (which may be required to establish its exemption by carrying its status on U.S. Internal Revenue Service Form W-9), (ii) in the case of a U.S. Holder other than a corporation, provides an accurate taxpayer identification number in the manner required by applicable law, (iii) in the case of a non-U.S. Holder, provides a properly executed U.S. Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN; or other successor Form, or (iv) otherwise establishes a basis for exemption. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder generally will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder's United States Federal income tax liability.

Dividends and Paying Agents

Not applicable.

Statement by Experts

Not applicable.

Documents on Display

The Company isWe are subject to the informational requirements of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with these requirements, the Company fileswe file annual reports and other information to the Commission. These materials, including this Annual Report on Form 20-F and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the Commission's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the Commission's regional offices at 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661, and 233 Broadway, New York, New York 10279-0001. Copies of the materials may be obtained from the Public Reference Room of the Commission at 450 Fifth100 F Street, N.W.N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Commission's Public Reference Room by calling the Commission in the United States at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission also maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. Form 20-F reports and some of the other information submitted by the Companyus to the Commission may be accessed through this web site.

Subsidiary Information

Not applicable.

ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following discussion contains forward looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are out of the Company'sour control. The Company'sOur primary market risks are related to fluctuations in the prices of gold, silver, zinc and lead. To a lesser extent, the Company iswe are subject to market risk related to fluctuations in US$/Nuevo Sol exchange rates and to market risk related to interest rate fluctuation on itsour cash balances and on borrowings under its credit facilities.balances.

Gold Commodity Contracts

Gold silver and zincsilver hedging and sensitivity to market price

The Company'sOur revenues and expenses are to a great extent influenced by world market prices for gold, silver and zinc that fluctuate widely and over which the Company haswe have no control. Depending upon the metal markets and other conditions, the Company from time to time hedges its gold, silver and zinc sales in order to decrease its exposure to fluctuations in the price of these metals. Until 1998, the Companywe pursued a limited economic hedging and options strategy, locking in metals prices on a medium-term basis when the Companywe considered market prices attractive. However, in 1998 the Companywe adopted a new hedging strategy, in order to focus on long-term position-taking on the price of precious metals.

The CompanyYanacocha has informed us that it has generally not engaged in, and is currently not engaged in, gold silverprice hedging activities, such as forward sales or option contracts, to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in the price of gold.

In October 2004 our Board of Directors issued a mandate not to enter into new hedging transactions. To avoid future fluctuations in the consolidated results of operations, since 2003, we have been modifying the terms of certain gold derivative instruments in order to qualify them as normal sales contracts. As of December 31, 2005, we significantly reduced our gold economic hedging contracts, and zincwe have downsized our participation in gold price hedging activities, such as forward sales and put/calls options, contracts. The Company hedges for risk management purposes only and does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. See Note 35 to the Company Financial Statements.

Forward sales agreements obligate the Company to sell15 percent of total gold silver or zinc at a specified price on a specified date. Put options provide the buyer with the right, but not the obligation, to sell gold, silver or zinc at the contract price. Call options provide the buyer with the right, but not the obligation to purchase gold, silver or zinc at the contract price.

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted IAS 39, "Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement". The Company does not meet all the criteria established in IAS 39 to account for all the prevailing derivative instruments as cash flow hedges.The criteria refer to formal documentation and testing of the effectiveness of the derivative instruments. The Company's subsidiary, Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A., has entered into future contracts (zinc and silver) that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. Upon adopting IAS 39, El Brocal prepared formal documentation of its future contracts and tested their effectiveness. El Brocal has tested the effectiveness of such contracts on a quarterly basis thereafter to determine if they still qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. Therefore, the Company recognized revenues of S/.44,760,000 in 2002, losses of S/.20,812,000 in 2003 and losses of S/.73,403,000 in 2004 in connection with derivative operations settled in these years, whic h are reflected as "realized gain (loss) in derivative instruments" in the consolidated statements of income, and the subsidiary El Brocal recognized revenues of S/.7,585,000 in 2002, S/.5,405,000 in 2003 and losses of S/.20,158,000, in 2004 in connection with hedging operations settled in these years, which are reflected as "net sales" in the consolidated statements of income.

commitments. At December 31, 20042005 we had gold derivative contracts for a maximum of 340,000 gold ounces at price up to US$357 per ounce of gold. At that date, the estimated fair value of the net hedging position (price hedging activities) was negativebynegative by S/.338,779,000..227.2 million. Fair value estimates are made at the balance sheet date, based upon relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties in significant mattersthe judgment of judgment.management. Changes in assumptions and market conditions could significantly affect these estimates. Factors usedDuring the three month period ended March 31, 2006, we recognized losses of S/.43.9 million due to the changes in determining the fair value of the remaining gold silver, zinc and other metals call options are the contracted sales pricederivative contracts which occurred during this period.

In March 2006, we closed out all our outstanding gold derivative contracts that were maintained as of gold, silver, zinc or other metals to current spot price and the probability of movements in the price of gold, silver, zinc or other metals over the term of the option. As at December 31, 2004, the combination of the current spot price2005 and the probability of future price changes has had a significant effect on the fair value of gold, silver, zinc or other metals call options sold. However, the e ffect of the probability of future price changes on the fair value estimate diminishes over the life of the option.

To minimize future fluctuations in the consolidated results of operations, the Company entered into transactions that closed out approximately two thirds of its outstanding derivative contracts in December 2003. These contracts were replaced them with a series of sales contracts requiringthat require physical delivery of the same quantity of gold over future periods that do not extend beyond 2012. (normal sales).

Under the terms of the normal sales contracts, the Companywe will realize capped prices ranging from US$332the applicable market price to US$451 per ounce. The fair value of these contracts, S/.710,682,000, was calculated immediately prior to their execution and recorded as "deferred revenue from sale of future production" in the consolidated balance sheet as of DecemberAt March 31, 2003. In 2004 Buenaventura delivered 198,000 ounces of gold as part of the sale contracts above mentioned. As a consequence Buenaventura recognized revenues of S/.68,837,000 in the caption "realized revenue from sale of future production" in the consolidated statements of income as o f December 31, 2004. Buenaventura is2006, we are committed to sell 1,844,0002,224,000 ounces of gold at prices ranging from US$332market price up to US$451 per ounce until December 2011. These contracts are accounted for as normal sales contracts..

Gold Commodity Contracts

The tables below are expressed inOctober 2012. In 2004 and 2005, we delivered 198,000 and 282,000 ounces of gold at an average price of US$341.82 and in US$/oz.

Gold Forward Sales Contracts. The Company had340.72, respectively, as part of the following gold forward sales contracts at Decembermentioned above. See further discussion in Note 34 to our Financial Statements.

Silver Derivatives Contracts

At March 31, 2004:

 

Expected Maturity/Transaction Date

Gold Forward Sales Contracts

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

After 2009

Total

Fair Value

US$

Ounces

80,000

80,000

80,000

80,000

40,000

-

360,000

*

Average price US$/oz

343.00

343.00

343.00

343.00

343.00

-

343.00

 

Fixed forward sales2006, we had contracts provide for delivery250,000 ounces of a specified number of ouncessilver at a specifiedfixed price and date. They are marked to market with the change reflectedof US$6.00, expiring in income.August 2006.

Gold Call Option Contracts. The Company had the following gold call options contracts at December 31, 2004:

Expected Maturity/Transaction Date

Gold Call Option Contracts

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

After 2009

Total

Fair Value

US$

Ounces

84,000

60,000

60,000

120,000

60,000

105,000

489,000

*

Average price US$/oz

375.00

350.00

348.75

382.50

345.00

345.00

360.43

 

Fixed purchased call option contracts generate the obligation to sell a specified number of ounces at a specified strike price; they are marked to market with the change reflected in income.

Gold Convertible Put Option Contracts. The Company

We had the following gold convertible put option contracts at DecemberMarch 31, 2004:2006:

 

Expected Maturity/Transaction Date

Gold Convertible PutOption Contracts

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

After 2009

Total

Fair Value

Knock-in contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ounces

120,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

Average price US$/oz

300.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

Knock-out contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Ounces

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

30,000

52,500

202,500

 

Average price US$/oz

345.00

345.00

345.00

345.00

345.00

345.00

345.00

 

Gold Convertible Put Option Contracts

2006

2007

2008

2009

After 2009

Total

Knock-in contracts

Ounces

Average price US$/oz

Knock-out contracts

Ounces

Average price US$/oz

-

-

45,000

345.00

-

-

60,000

345.00

120,000

300.00

60,000

345.00

-

-

60,000

345.00

-

-

52,500

345.00

-

-

397,500

345.00

Knock-out/knock-in option contracts are contingent bought put options that might terminate (or knock-out) or convert (or knock-in) to bought put options, depending on certain market conditions. Referred contingent option contracts are marked to market with changes reflected in income. Fair value of these contracts as of March 31, 2006 was US$33,830.

Normal Sales. The Company

We had the following normal sales contracts outstanding at DecemberMarch 31, 2004:2006:

 

Expected Maturity/Transaction Date

Normal Sales

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

After 2009

Total

Fair Value

Ounces

208,000

308,000

328,000

188,000

263,000

549,000

1'844,000

 

Average price - cap US$/oz

340.72

337.89

337.53

341.65

381.50

421.82

369.74

 

Normal Sales

2006

2007

2008

2009

After 2009

Total

Fair Value

Ounces

291,000

368,000

388,000

383,000

794,000

2,224,000

 

Average price - cap US$/oz

338.94

338.13

354.56

370.12

406.55

371.04

 

(*) The fair value of gold forward sales contracts, gold call option contracts and gold convertible put option contracts accounted for US$100,741,574 at December 31, 2004.

The CompanyWe regularly examines itsexamine our strategy with regard to hedging. TheOur Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Commercial Deputy Manager of the Company coordinate the Company'sour day-to-day economic hedging activities.

Hedging Contracts

As Mark to market value of April 30, 2005, the Company had entered into the following hedging contracts:

    1. As of June 15, 2001, the Company restructured a contract to encompass the period from April 2001 through November 2005, consisting of two parts: (1) an agreement for the sale of 1,200,000 ounces of silver per year, 100,000 ounces of silver per month, at a fixed price of US$5.80 per ounce, with monthly maturities (unless, in a given month, the average market price is US$4.15 or below, in which case there is no sale under this part of the contract); and (2) an agreement relating to the sale of silver, with weekly maturities, where (a) if the prevailing market price of silver is greater than US$6.20 but not greater than US$7.00, the Company pays an amount equal to the difference between 23,077 ounces (such number of ounces increasing to up to 46,154 ounces per week as the prevailing market price of silver increases) at the prevailing market price and US$6.20 for those ounces, or (b) if the prevailing market price of silver is greater than US$5.80 but not greater than US$6.20, the Company is paid an amount equal to the difference between zero ounces (such number of ounces increasing to up to 23,077 ounces per week as the prevailing market price of silver increases) at US$6.20 and the prevailing market price for those ounces.
    2. As part of this transaction, the Company sold gold calls with a strike price of US$350 per ounce for 2,000 ounces per month commencing January 2003 through December 2005.

    3. A contract consisting of two parts encompassing the period from September 2001 through August 2006: (1) an agreement for the sale of 1,500,000 ounces of silver or 25,000 ounces of silver per month, at a fixed price of US$6.00 per ounce, with monthly maturities (unless in any given month the average market price is US$4.00 or below, in which case there is no sale under this part of the contract); and (2) an agreement for the sale of silver, with weekly maturities between September 2001 and August 2006, where (a) if the prevailing market price of silver is greater than US$6.00 but at or above US$7.00, the Company pays an amount equal to the difference between 5,769.25 ounces (such number of ounces increasing to up to 11,538.50 ounces per week as the prevailing market price of silver increases) at the prevailing market price and US$6.00 for those ounces.
    4. As part of this transaction the Company is required to sell to the buyer 60,000 ounces of gold per year or 15,000 ounces of gold per quarter at a price of US$385 per ounce between March 2004 and December 2005, and 15,000 ounces of gold per quarter at a price of US$420 per ounce between March and December 2008, at the buyer's option on each decision date (end of December 2003, end of December 2004, end of December 2007, and for quarterly maturities of the year following the exercise of the option).

      If the buyer exercises its option, it will pay to the Company a bonus premium of US$250,000 annually on the last business day of 2003, 2004 and 2007 and the Company will also own put options for 120,000 ounces of gold per year or 30,000 ounces per quarter at a price of US$300 per ounce between March 2004 and December 2005, and between March and December 2008.

    5. A contract for the sale of 80,000 ounces of gold per year, or 20,000 ounces of gold per quarter, at a fixed price of US$343 per ounce, with quarterly maturities from September 2003 through June 2009. For the September 2003 to June 2005 value dates and also for the September 2005 to June 2009 value dates, the buyer has the right but not the obligation to terminate the above-mentioned cancellable swaps in full at the end of each calendar month from June 2002 through May 2005, and at the end of each calendar month from June 2003 through May 2009, respectively.

(4) A contract for the sale of 30,000 ounces of gold per year, or 7,500 ounces of gold per quarter, at a fixed price of US$345 per ounce, with quarterly maturities from January 2005 through July 2012. If the gold price is below US$279.50 per ounce between January 2003 and July 2007, the outstanding gold ounces of this period will be cancelled. However, if the gold price at the end of a quarter is greater than US$345 per ounce between January 2008 and July 2011, greater than US$396 per ounce between January 2011 and October 2011, greater than US$404 per ounce between January 2012 and October 2012, the Company is required to sell to the buyer in that quarter, twice the volume of ounces previously settled for that maturity. The buyer has the right but not the obligation to terminate separately, no later than 15 calendar days prior to the maturity of the nearest option maturity, the gold options maturing from October 2007 to July 2008, from October 2008 to July 2009, from October 2009 to Ju ly 2010, from October 2010 to July 2011, and from October 2011 to October 2012.

(5) As of December 31, 2003, the Company restructured a contract for the sale of 310,000 ounces of gold at a fixed price of US$332 per ounce, with quarterly maturities from June 2003 through March 2008 (5,000 ounces per quarter for 2003, 12,500 ounces for March 2004 and 7,500 ounces for the remaining quarters of 2004, 10,000 ounces per quarter for 2005, 22,500 ounces per quarter for 2006, 25,000 ounces per quarter for 2007, and 30,000 ounces for March 2008). If, however, the price of gold two business days before the end of a quarter is higher than US$332 per ounce, the Company is instead required in that quarter to sell to the buyer twice the volume of ounces previously settled for that maturity.

Pursuant to the restructuring, the Company will deliver physical gold as follows: 25,000 ounces of gold for March 2004 and 15,000 ounces of gold per quarter for the remaining quarters of 2004, 20,000 ounces of gold per quarter for 2005, 50,000 ounces of gold per quarter for 2006, 50,000 ounces of gold per quarter for 2007, and 60,000 ounces of gold for March 2008. If on the pricing date the gold price is greater than US$332 per ounce, then the contract price will equal US$332 per ounce for that value date. If on the pricing date the gold price is below US$332 per ounce, then the contract price for that value date will be US$332 per ounce for 50 percent of the scheduled volume, while the applicable gold price for the other 50 percent will be the market price.

(6) As of December 31, 2003, the Company restructured a contract for the sale of 60,000 ounces of gold per year or 15,000 ounces of gold per quarter at a fixed price of US$347.50 per ounce, with quarterly renewals for up to eight years, commencing March 2004 through December 2011 if the gold price is above US$290 per ounce.

Pursuant to the restructuring, the Company will deliver physical gold according to the referred quarterly volumes and maturities for March 2004 through December 2011 Under this variable contract price Bullion trades, if on the pricing date the gold price is greater than US$ 290 per ounce, then the contract price will equal US$347.50 per ounce for that value date. If on the pricing date, the gold price is at or below US$290 per ounce the contract price for that value date and all subsequent volume dates will be equal to the gold price on the relevant price date minus US$0.10.

(7) As of December 31, 2003, the Company restructured a contract for the sale of 30,000 ounces of gold per year, or 7,500 ounces of gold per quarter, at a fixed price of US$345 per ounce, with quarterly maturities, commencing in March 2003 through December 2009 if the gold price is above US$265 per ounce (if, however, the price of gold three business days before the end of a quarter is higher than US$345 per ounce, the Company is instead required in that quarter to sell to the buyer 9,500 ounces of gold at US$345 per ounce).

Pursuant to the restructuring, the Company will deliver physical gold as follows: 17,000 ounces of gold per quarter, from March 2004 until December 2009. For each gold delivery, the amount to be paid to the Company for each ounce of gold delivered to the counterparty's London account will be determined on the contract's expiration date as follows: (i) if the price of gold on the contract's expiration date is at or above US$345 per ounce, and gold has not traded at or below US$265 per ounce at any time prior to the contract's expiration date the gold price will be equal US$345 per ounce; (ii) if gold trades at or below US$265 per ounce at any time prior to the contract's expiration date then the gold price will be the market price; and (iii) if gold on the contract's expiration date is below US$345 per ounce, and gold has not traded at or below US$265 per ounce at any time then 7,500 ounces of delivered gold will be paid at US$345 per ounce, and 9,500 ounces of delivered gold will be paid a t the market price.

(8) On December 31, 2003, the Company restructured a contract for the sale of calls for 20,000 ounces of gold per month at the strike price of US$400 per ounce for the period from January 2008 through December 2008, together with 27,000 ounces of gold per month at the strike price of US$415 per ounce for the period from January 2009 through December 2009.

Pursuant to the restructuring,these contracts as of December 22, 2004, the Company will deliver physical gold according to the following volumes and maturities: 27,000 ounces of gold per month or 135,000 ounces in total for the period January 2009 through May 2009; 20,000 ounces of gold per month or 240,000 ounces in total for the period January 2010 through December 2010; and 27,000 ounces of gold per month or 189,000 ounces in total for the period June 2011 through December 2011. If on the pricing date, the bullion reference price is greater thanMarch 31, 2006 was negative US$415, US$436 or US$451 per ounce during 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively, then the maximum contract price will either be US$415, US$436 or US$451 per ounce for the value date. If on the pricing date, the bullion reference price is below US$415, US$436 or US$436 per ounce during 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively, then the contract price will be the market price.583.1 million.

As of December 31, 2004, El Brocal has no open hedging positions pending settlement. However, pursuant to a contract with Trafigura Beheer B.V., El Brocal must deliver zinc concentrates to Cormin Peru S.A. at the price fixed. El Brocal is required to deliver 1,809 metric tons at a fixed price of US$929 in March 2005, 1,736 metric tons at a fixed price of US929 in April 2005, 1,736 metric tons at a fixed price of US$927 in May 2005 and 1,736 metric tons at a fixed price of US$935 in June 2005.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

The Company entered into a forwardWe buy and sell our products and obtain capital financing and investment in U.S. Dollars; consequently, we have exposure to the effects of fluctuations in the prevailing foreign currency exchange contract for US$7,414,000, at rates ranging between S/.3.554rates. In periods of devaluation, holding a net monetary asset position in a foreign currency would result in an exchange gain (exchange loss in periods of appreciation) while holding a net monetary liability position in foreign currency would result in an exchange loss (exchange gains in periods of appreciation). From 2001 to S/.3.589 per U.S. Dollar2003, we held a net monetary liability position and with stated maturities similarfrom 2004 and 2005, we held a net asset position. We do not use derivative financial instruments to time deposits. See Note 6 tomanage this risk and we consider that the Company Financial Statements. In 2004, this forwardfuture fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange contract generated a losswill not significantly affect the results of approximately S/.1,818,000 (S/.2,436,000 in 2003) due to a lower market exchange rate compared to the contract exchange rate. At December 31, 2004, the fair value of this contract was S/.2,182,000(S/.737,000 at December 31, 2003) and is presented as "other current liabilities" in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 31 to the Company Financial Statements.our future operations.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

As of December 31, 2004, the Company's subsidiary, Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A. entered into an interest rate contract that swapped 90 days LIBOR for a fixed annual rate of 3.05 percent on a nominal value of US$4,583,333; this swap agreement has a stated maturity of September 2006. During 2003, the liquidation of this liability and other swap operations generated a loss of approximately S/.718,000, which is presented as part of financial expenses, in the Statements of Income. During 2004, this operation generated a loss of approximately S/.254,000, explained by the drop of the Libor with respectWe reduce our exposure to the risks due to variations in interest rates by engaging in financial obligations and capital leasing with fixed rate. As of December 31, 2003,interest rates. See note 18 to the Company had a liability of S/.293,000 in connection with the fair value of these contracts, which is recorded asFinancial Statements. Consequently, we do not use derivative instruments in the Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2004, the fair value of these contracts was insignificant.to manage this risk and we do not expect to incur significant losses based on interest risks.

ITEM 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

Not applicable.

ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

ITEM 15. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

As of December 31, 2004,2005, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon and as of the date of our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, proces sed, summarized and reported as and when required.

Changes in internal controls.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 20042005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Luis Coleridge Alcántara is the Audit Committee financial expert as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Coleridge and each of the other members of the Audit Committee are "independent directors" as defined in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE's Listed Company Manual.

ITEM 16B. Code of Ethics

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions, as well as all other employees. Our code of business conduct and ethics is posted on, and we intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from our code of business conduct and ethics on, our website which is located at http://www.buenaventura.com. The information on the Company'sour website is not a part of, nor incorporated into, this document.

ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Medina, Zaldivar, Paredes & Asociados, a member firm of Ernst & Young International, has served as the Company'sour independent public accountant for each of the fiscal years in the two-year period ended December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, for which audited financial statements appear in this annual report on Form 20-F. The auditor is elected annually at the General Meeting. The Audit Committee proposed at the General Meeting that ErnstMedina, Zaldivar, Paredes & YoungAsociados be elected as the independent auditor for 2005.2006.

The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered by ErnstMedina, Zaldivar, Paredes & YoungAsociados for 20032004 and 2004.2005.

 

Year ended December 31,

 

20032004

20042005

Audit Fees

US$252,118313,270

US$313,270330,500

Audit-Related Fees

US$70,000

US$70,000150,200

Tax Fees

US$87,22582,000

US$82,00080,000

All Other Fees

Audit Fees. Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by ErnstMedina, Zaldivar, Paredes & YoungAsociados in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of our quarterly financial statements and statutory and regulatory audits.

Audit-related Fees. The Company had no audit-related fees for 2003 for financial accountingIn 2004 and reporting consultations. In 2004,2005, audit-related fees were incurred in connection with a quality assurance review of the initial implementation of the United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Tax Fees. Tax fees in the above table are fees billed by ErnstMedina, Zaldivar, Paredes & Young for services based upon existing facts and prior transactionsAsociados in order to document, compute, and obtain government approval for amounts included inconnection with review of income tax filings, such as value-added tax return assistance, transfer pricing documentationstudies and requests for technical advice from taxing authorities.tax consultations.

Other Fees. The CompanyWe had no Other Fees for 20032004 and 2004.2005.

Audit Committee Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

The Company'sOur Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy regarding pre-approval of audit services provided by our independent auditors, (the "Policy").or the Policy. In accordance with the Policy, the Audit Committee must pre-approve the provision of services by the Company'sour independent auditor for all audit and non-audit services prior to commencement of the specified service. The requests for pre-approval are submitted to the Audit Committee by the Chief Financial Officer and following approval by audit committee members and engagement letter is executed. The Audit Committee approved all audit, tax and audit-related fees in 2004.2005.

ITEM 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

ITEM 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

For the year ended December 31, 2004,2005, neither the Companywe nor any person acting on the Company'sour behalf made any purchase of the Company'sour common shares.

PART III

ITEM 17. Financial Statements

Not applicable.

ITEM 18. Financial Statements

Please refer to Item 19.

ITEM 19. Exhibits

 

Page

(a) Index to Financial Statements and Schedules

 

COMPAÑIA DE MINAS BUENAVENTURA S.A.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

 

 

Report of Independent AuditorsRegistered Public Accounting Firm

F-1

Consolidated financial statements

 

Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005

F-2

Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

F-3

Consolidated statements of changes in shareholders' equity for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

F-4

Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

F-5

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

F-7

 

 

MINERA YANACOCHA S.R.L.

 

 

 

Report of the Independent AuditorsRegistered Public Accounting Firm

F-67F-52

Financial statements

 

Balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004

F-68

Statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

F-69F-53

Balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2005

F-54

Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005

F-55

Statements of changes in Partners' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

F-70

Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2003

F-71F-56

Notes to the financial statements

F-72F-57

 

 

(b) Index to Exhibits

 

 

 

1.1 By-Laws (Estatutos) of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., as amended April 30, 2002 (incorporated by reference from Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on June 25, 2003)

 

1.2 By-Laws (Estatutos) of Minera Yanacocha S. R. L., as amended October 18, 1999 (incorporated by reference from Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on June 25, 2003)

 

4.1 Participation Agreement among Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Corporation, Summit Global Management B.V., Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., Phelps Dodge Corporation, Cyprus AmaxClimax Minerals Company, Cyprus Metals Company, Cyprus Climax Metals Company and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. dated March 16, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Compañia de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on May 27, 2005)

4.2 Shareholders Agreement among SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands B.V., Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Corporation, Summit Global Management B.V., Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., Cyprus Climax Metals Company, Phelps Dodge Corporation and Sociedad Minera Cerno Verde S.A.A. dated June 1, 2005

 

11 Code of Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference from Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on June 25, 2003)

 

12.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

12.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

13.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

13.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

COMPAÑÍA DE MINAS BUENAVENTURA S.A.A.

By: /S/ CARLOS E. GÁLVEZ PINILLOS
Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 27, 2005June 6, 2006

Index to the Financial Statements

Page

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and subsidiaries

Report of Independent Auditors,Registered Public Accounting Firm, issued by ErnstMedina,
Zaldivar, Paredes & YoungAsociados F-1

Consolidated financial statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 F-2


Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004
and 20042005 F-3


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 F-4


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2002,2003,
20032004 and 20042005 F-5


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-7

Minera Yanacocha S.R.L.

Report of the Independent Auditors F-67

Registered Public Accounting Firm F-52
Financial statements

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 F-68

Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 F-53
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 F-69

and 2005 F-54
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 F-55
Statements of Changes in Partners' Equity for the year ended December 31,
2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004 F-70

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 F-71

2005 F-56
Notes to the Financial Statements F-72F-57

ERNST & YOUNG Medina, Zaldivar, Paredes
& Asociados Sociedad Civil

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders ofCompañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.S.A.A.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets ofCompañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (a Peruvian company)and subsidiaries(together, (together, the Company) as of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements of Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (an equity accounted affiliated entity in which the Company has aan 43.65 percent interest) and the financial statements of Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A. A. (an equity accounted affiliated entity in which the Company has an 18.299 percent interest) as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 have been audited by other auditors,auditor whose report hasreports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, on the consolidated financial statements, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., is based solely on the reportreports of the otherothers auditors. In the consolidated financial stateme ntsstatements of the Company, as derived from the financial statements of Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., the Company's investment and share in the net income of Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. amount to approximatelyin this entity is S/1,101.0.1,152.2 million and S/1,152.2.1,714.4 million atas of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and 2005, and S/361.5.515.7 million, S/515.7.583.3 million and S/583.3.752.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively. Likewise, the Company's investment and share in the net income in Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., obtained from the corresponding financial statements, is S/.491.9 million as of December 31, 2005 and S/.125.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, respectively.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our auditaudits included consideration of internal control reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An auditOur audits also includesinclude examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statementstatements presentation. We believe that our audits and the reportrepor ts of the independent auditors of Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reportreports of the other auditors, of Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position ofCompañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and subsidiariesas of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Peru, which differ in certain respects from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (see notes 3938 and 4039 to the consolidated financial statements).

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the IAS 39, Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement, and together with its affiliate Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., modified its accounting policy to record its long-lived assets retirement obligations, see notes 2 and 3 toobligations. Likewise, effective January 1, 2005, with the consolidated financial statements.purpose of adopting international industry practices, the Company modified its accounting policies for recording mining stripping costs. See note 3.

/S/ MEDINA, ZALDIVAR, PAREDES & ASOCIADOS

Countersigned by:

/S/ VICTOR BURGA_____
BURGA          

Víctor Burga

C.P.C. Register No.14859

Lima, Peru

February 18, 2005,17, 2006, except for notes 3938 and 40,

39
as to which the date is MarchJune 5, 2006

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2004 and 2005
Stated in thousand of Peruvian Nuevos Soles

Note

2004

2005

2005

 

 

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

US$(000)

 

 

 

 

(Note 4)

Assets

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

6

614,862

332,102

96,795

Investment funds

7

86,971

52,884

15,414

Trade accounts receivable

8

97,061

93,354

27,209

Other accounts receivable, net

9

12,248

19,089

5,563

Accounts receivable from affiliates

37(b)

46,078

66,038

19,247

Inventories, net

10

69,353

94,377

27,507

Current portion of prepaid tax and expenses

11

40,471

43,182

12,586

Total current assets

 

967,044

701,026

204,321

 

 

 

 

 

Long - term other accounts receivable

9

4,574

5,044

1,470

Prepaid tax and expenses

11

14,059

12,405

3,616

Investment in shares

12

1,531,347

2,502,267

729,311

Property, plant and equipment, net

13

603,559

583,281

170,003

Development costs, net

14

143,258

163,924

47,778

Deferred stripping costs

3(b)

56,056

-

-

Other non-current assets, net

 

6,199

5,303

1,546

Deferred income tax and workers' profit
sharing asset, net

31(a)

245,299

308,091

89,796

Total assets

 

3,571,395

4,281,341

1,247,841

 

 

Note

2003

2004

2004

 

Note

2003

2004

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S/(000)

S/(000)

US$(000)
(Note 4)

 

 

S/(000)

S/(000)

US$(000)
(Note 4)

Assets

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and shareholders' equity, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

Bank loans

17

23,461

13,150

4,005

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable

18

52,699

61,188

18,638

Cash and cash equivalents

6

398,551

614,862

187,287

Other current liabilities

19

86,125

142,696

43,465

Investment funds

7

54,881

86,971

26,491

Derivative instruments

35

99,893

70,927

21,604

Trade accounts receivable

8

74,266

97,061

29,565

Current portion of long-term debt

20

70,453

36,332

11,067

Other accounts receivable, net

9

23,471

12,248

3,731

Deferred income from sale of future production

35

68,841

74,937

22,826

Accounts receivable from affiliates

38

37,698

46,078

14,035

Total current liabilities

 

401,472

399,230

121,605

Inventories, net

10

77,232

69,353

21,125

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of prepaid tax and expenses

11

45,544

40,471

12,327

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities

19

76,853

74,030

22,550

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative instruments

35

307,826

267,852

81,588

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

20

45,468

15,031

4,578

Total current assets

 

711,643

967,044

294,561

Deferred income from sale of future production

35

641,122

568,772

173,248

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

1,472,741

1,324,915

403,569

 

 

 

 

 

Minority interest

21

48,428

66,347

20,209

Long - term accounts receivable

9

5,008

4,574

1,393

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid tax and expenses

11

7,552

14,059

4,282

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in shares

12

1,443,035

1,531,347

466,447

Shareholders' equity, net

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

13

408,132

452,214

137,745

Capital stock, net of treasury shares of

 

 

 

 

Mine development costs, net

14

123,821

143,258

43,636

S/49,659,000 in 2003 and 2004

22

596,755

596,755

181,771

Deferred stripping costs

15

56,056

56,056

17,075

Investment shares, net of treasury shares of

 

 

 

 

Mining concessions and goodwill, net

16

168,130

157,544

47,988

S/66,000 in 2003 and 2004

 

1,683

1,683

513

Deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing asset, net

32

297,441

245,299

74,718

Additional paid-in capital

 

610,659

610,659

186,006

Total assets

 

3,220,818

3,571,395

1,087,845

Legal reserve

 

99,286

129,276

39,378

 

 

 

 

 

Retained earnings

 

217,874

734,982

223,875

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative translation loss

 

(29,395)

(148,513)

(45,237 )

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative unrealized gain on investments in shares carried at fair value

 

209,130

256,331

78,078

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders' equity, net

 

1,699,649

2,180,133

664,067

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity, net

 

3,220,818

3,571,395

1,087,845

 

Note

2004

2005

2005

 

 

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

US$(000)

 

 

 

 

(Note 4)

Liabilities and shareholders' equity, net

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

Bank loans

15

13,150

26,229

7,645

Trade accounts payable

16

61,188

53,089

15,473

Other current liabilities

17

133,261

204,597

59,633

Derivative instruments

34(a)

70,927

59,138

17,236

Current portion of long-term debt

18

36,332

1,631

475

Deferred income from sale of future production

34(b)

74,937

107,079

31,209

Total current liabilities

 

389,795

451,763

131,671

Other long-term liabilities

17

83,465

96,852

28,229

Derivative instruments

34(a)

267,852

168,017

48,970

Long-term debt

18

15,031

1,367

398

Deferred income from sale of future production

34(b)

568,772

613,791

178,896

Total liabilities

 

1,324,915

1,331,790

388,164

Minority interest

19

66,347

80,247

23,389

Shareholders' equity, net

 

 

 

 

Capital stock, net of treasury shares of S/.49,659,000 in 2004 and 2005

20

596,755

596,755

173,930

Investment shares, net of treasury shares of S/.66,000 in 2004 and S/.127,000 in 2005

 

1,683

1,622

473

Additional capital

 

610,659

609,734

177,713

Legal reserve

 

129,276

129,276

37,679

Other reserves

 

923

923

269

Retained earnings

 

734,059

1,598,716

465,962

Cumulative translation loss

 

(148,513)

(67,962)

(19,808)

Cumulative unrealized gain on investments in shares carried at fair value, note 12(a)

 

256,331

240

70

Cumulative unrealized loss on derivative instruments

 

(1,040)

-

-

Total shareholders' equity, net

 

2,180,133

2,869,304

836,288

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity, net

 

3,571,395

4,281,341

1,247,841

The accompanying notes are an integral partCompañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of these consolidated balance sheetsIncome

 

Note

2002

2003

2004

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

US$(000)
(Note 4)

Operating revenues

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

24

575,707

735,306

908,441

276,711

Income realized from sale of future production

35

-

-

68,837

20,968

Royalties income

38

82,350

116,857

128,889

39,260

Total revenues

 

658,057

852,163

1,106,167

336,939

Costs of operation

 

 

 

 

 

Operating costs

25

273,686

302,572

338,074

102,977

Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites

26

77,660

85,715

127,169

38,736

Depreciation and amortization

13(c )

43,195

49,118

59,473

18,115

Total costs of operation

 

394,541

437,405

524,716

159,828

Gross margin

 

263,516

414,758

581,451

177,111

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration costs in non-operational mining sites

27

40,309

59,255

88,241

26,878

General and administrative

28

79,298

123,161

76,866

23,413

Royalties to third parties

37(b )

14,681

25,142

24,918

7,590

Selling

29

24,314

25,776

17,839

5,435

Amortization of mining concessions and goodwill

16

17,441

15,578

15,598

4,749

Royalties to the Peruvian Government

19(d )

-

-

6,639

2,022

Asset impairment loss and write-off

 

1,634

4,691

2,889

880

Total operating expenses

 

177,677

253,603

232,990

70,967

Operating income

 

85,839

161,155

348,461

106,144

Other income (expenses)

 

 

 

 

 

Share in affiliated companies

12(b )

353,963

557,558

575,858

175,406

Gain (loss) from change in the fair value of derivative instruments

35

-

(647,218)

14,629

4,456

Interest income

30

9,215

7,785

12,132

3,694

Realized gain (loss) in derivative instruments

35

44,760

(20,812 )

(73,403 )

(22,359 )

Gain (loss) from exposure to inflation

2(a )

(3,312 )

321

(22,483 )

(6,849 )

Interest expense

30

(16,702 )

(8,687 )

(7,515 )

(2,289 )

Loss from sale of subsidiary's shares

 

(7,069 )

-

-

-

Other, net

31

2,954

(12,804 )

(13,505 )

(4,114 )

Total other income (expenses), net

 

383,809

(123,857 )

485,713

147,945

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before workers' profit sharing, income tax, minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change

 

469,648

37,298

834,174

254,089

Provision for workers' profit sharing

32(a )

(1,613 )

62,887

(18,356 )

(5,591 )

Provision for income tax

32(a )

(26,859 )

198,286

(101,997 )

(31,068 )

Income before minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change

 

441,176

298,471

713,821

217,430

Minority interest

21

(25,461 )

(51,023 )

(28,171 )

(8,581 )

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

 

415,715

247,448

685,650

208,849

Cumulative effect of accounting change for mine closing costs

3

-

(72,295 )

-

-

Net income

 

415,715

175,153

685,650

208,849

Basic and diluted earnings per share before cumulative effect of accounting change, stated in Peruvian nuevos soles and U.S. dollars

33

3.27

1.95

5.39

1.64

Cumulative effect of accounting change for mine closing costs

 

-

(0.57 )

-

-

Basic and diluted earnings per share, stated in nuevos soles and U.S. dollars

33

3.27

1.38

5.39

1.64

Weighted average number of shares outstanding

 

127,236,219

127,236,219

127,236,219

127,236,219

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
Stated in thousand of Peruvian Nuevos Soles

 

Note

2003

2004

2005

2005

 

 

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

US$(000)

 

 

 

 

 

(Note 4)

Operating revenues

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

22

735,306

908,441

936,595

272,980

Realized income from sale of future production

34(b)

-

68,837

92,753

27,034

Royalties income

37(a)

116,857

128,889

152,342

44,402

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Total revenues

 

852,163

1,106,167

1,181,690

344,416

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Costs of operations

 

 

 

 

 

Operating costs

23

306,624

340,697

343,327

100,066

Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites

24

86,354

127,435

136,053

39,654

Depreciation and amortization

13(c)

63,786

74,077

111,177

32,404

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Total costs of operations

 

456,764

542,209

590,557

172,124

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Gross margin

 

395,399

563,958

591,133

172,292

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration costs in non-operational mining sites

25

59,255

88,241

91,919

26,792

General and administrative

26

123,161

76,866

112,630

32,827

Royalties

27

25,142

31,557

40,350

11,760

Selling

28

25,776

17,839

15,864

4,624

Amortization of other assets

 

910

994

896

261

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Total operating expenses

 

234,244

215,497

261,659

76,264

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Operating income

 

161,155

348,461

329,474

96,028

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Other income (expenses), net

 

 

 

 

 

Share in affiliated companies, net

12(b)

557,558

575,858

870,748

253,788

Loss from change in the fair value of derivative instruments

34(a)

(668,030)

(58,774)

(87,872)

(25,611)

Interest income

29

7,785

12,132

11,646

3,394

Gain (loss) from exposure to inflation

2(a)

793

(9,847)

-

-

Exchange difference gain (loss)

 

(472)

(12,636)

1,483

432

Interest expense

29

(8,687)

(7,515)

(5,797)

(1,689)

Other, net

30

(12,804)

(13,505)

(18,305)

(5,334)

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Total other income (expenses), net

 

(123,857)

485,713

771,903

224,980

 

 

__________

__________

__________

__________

Income before workers' profit sharing, income tax, minority interest and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles

 

37,298

834,174

1,101,377

321,008

Workers' profit sharing

31(a)

62,887

(18,356)

(8,569)

(2,498)

Income tax

31(a)

198,286

(101,997)

(75,406)

(21,978)

 

 

_________

_________

_________

_________

Income before minority interest and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles

 

298,471

713,821

1,017,402

296,532

Minority interest

19

(51,023)

(28,171)

(66,003)

(19,237)

 

 

_________

_________

_________

_________

Income before cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles

 

247,448

685,650

951,399

277,295

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle due to mine closing

3(a)

(72,295)

-

-

-

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle due to stripping costs

3(b)

-

-

(10,416)

(3,036)

Net income

 

175,153

685,650

940,983

274,259

Basic and diluted earnings per share, before cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles, stated in Peruvian Nuevos Soles and U.S. dollars

32

1.95

5.39

7.48

2.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle due to mine closing

 

(0.57)

-

-

-

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle due to stripping costs

 

-

-

(0.08)

(0.02)

Basic and diluted earnings per share, stated in Peruvian Nuevos Soles and U.S. dollars

32

1.38

5.39

7.40

2.16

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding

 

127,236,219

127,236,219

127,229,844

127,229,844

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
Stated in thousand of Peruvian Nuevos Soles

 

Capital stock, net of
treasury shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of shares

Common shares

Investment shares

Additional capital

Legal
reserve

Other

reserves

Retained earnings

Cumulative translation loss

Cumulative unrealized gain on investments in shares carried at fair value

Cumulative unrealized loss on derivative instruments

Total

 

 

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1st, 2003

126,879,832

596,755

1,683

610,659

81,537

-

683,769

7,369

-

-

1,981,772

Loss in the initial valuation of investments in shares maintained at fair value, note 2(f)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(5,957)

-

-

-

(5,957)

Declared and paid dividends, note 20(f)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(159,164)

-

-

-

(159,164)

Shares carried at fair value

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

209,130

-

209,130

Loss in the initial valuation of derivative instruments, note 2(r)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(458,189)

-

-

-

(458,189)

Gain in the initial valuation of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments held by El Brocal, note 2(r)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,742

1,742

Loss from change in the fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments held by El Brocal

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(8,085)

(8,085)

Transfer to legal reserve

-

-

-

-

17,749

-

(17,749)

-

-

-

-

Cumulative loss for translation of investment in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., maintained through Compañía Minera Condesa S.A., note 20(g)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(36,764)

-

-

(36,764)

Net income

-

-

-

-

-

-

175,153

-

-

-

175,153

Balance as of December 31, 2003

126,879,832

596,755

1,683

610,659

99,286

-

217,863

(29,395)

209,130

(6,343)

1,699,638

Declared and paid dividends, note 20(f)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(139,464)

-

-

-

(139,464)

Investments in shares maintained at fair value

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

47,201

-

47,201

Gain from change in the fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments held by El Brocal, note 34(a)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4,621

4,621

Transfer due to change in terms of hedging contracts held by the subsidiary El Brocal

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Realized income from sale of future production of El Brocal

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

682

682

Transfer to legal reserve

-

-

-

-

29,990

-

(29,990)

-

-

-

-

Others

-

-

-

-

-

923

-

-

-

-

923

Cumulative loss for translation of investment in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., maintained through Compañía Minera Condesa S.A., note 20(g)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(119,118)

-

-

(119,118)

Net income

-

-

-

-

-

-

685,650

-

-

-

685,650

Balance as of December 31, 2004

126,879,832

596,755

1,683

610,659

129,276

923

734,059

(148,513)

256,331

(1,040)

2,180,133

Effect of adoption of the equity method on Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. investment, note 12(j)

-

-

-

-

-

-

75,680

(10,348)

(256,043)

-

(190,711)

Declared and paid dividends, note 20(f)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(152,006)

-

-

-

(152,006)

Investments in shares maintained at fair value

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(48)

-

(48)

Realized revenue from sale of future production of El Brocal

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,040

1,040

Investment shares acquired by Subsidiary

-

-

(61)

(925)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(986)

Cumulative loss for translation of investment in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., (maintained through Compañía Minera Condesa S.A.) and in Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., note 20(g)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

90,899

-

-

90,899

Net income

-

-

-

-

-

-

940,983

-

-

-

940,983

Balance as of December 31, 2005

126,879,832

596,755

1,622

609,734

129,276

923

1,598,716

(67,962)

240

-

2,869,304

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005 Stated in thousand of Peruvian Nuevos Soles

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

2004

2005

2005

 

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

US$(000)

 

 

 

 

(Note 4)

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

Collection from customers

733,646

885,646

940,302

274,061

Collection of dividends

482,025

419,782

307,926

89,748

Collection of royalties

112,354

120,136

131,816

38,419

Collection of interest

8,827

11,909

10,627

3,097

Payments to suppliers and third parties

(313,826)

(355,188)

(365,353)

(106,485)

Payments of exploration expenditures

(128,684)

(172,215)

(181,921)

(53,023)

Payments to employees

(101,629)

(119,594)

(147,048)

(42,859)

Payments of income tax

(38,509)

(44,478)

(84,750)

(24,701)

Payments of royalties

(25,976)

(27,248)

(42,803)

(12,475)

Payments of interest

(8,686)

(5,170)

(5,797)

(1,690)

Net cash provided by operating activities

719,542

713,580

562,999

164,092

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

Payments for purchase of investments in shares

(4,663)

(8,084)

(509,163)

(148,401)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

(67,814)

(96,507)

(70,253)

(20,476)

Development expenditures

(38,504)

(38,611)

(57,586)

(16,783)

Payments from derivative instruments settled, net

(20,812)

(73,403)

(24,157)

(7,041)

Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment

2,464

1,595

663

193

Decrease (increase) on time deposits

-

(24,255)

24,255

7,069

Decrease (increase) of investment fund

(53,068)

(34,735)

38,869

11,329

Proceeds from sale of shares

3,059

330

-

-

Net cash used in investing activities

(179,338)

(273,670)

(597,372)

(174,110)

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

Payments of dividends

(159,164)

(139,464)

(152,006)

(44,304)

Payments of long-term debt

(22,213)

(76,705)

(50,354)

(14,675)

Payments of dividends for minority interest shareholders

(33,283)

(33,521)

(36,840)

(10,737)

Proceeds from long-term debt

-

12,147

1,989

580

Increase (decrease) of bank loans, net

(22,921)

(10,311)

13,079

3,811

Net cash used in financing activities

(237,581)

(247,854)

(224,132)

(65,325)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the year

302,623

192,056

(258,505)

(75,343)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

95,928

398,551

590,607

172,138

Cash and cash equivalents at year-end, note 6

398,551

590,607

332,102

96,795

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital stock, net of treasury shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of shares

Common shares

Investment shares

Additional paid-in capital

Legal reserve

Retained earnings

Cumulative translation gain (loss)

Cumulative unrealized gain on investments in shares carried at fair value

Cumulative unrealized loss on derivative instruments

Total

 

 

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

Balance as of January 1st, 2002

126,235,832

181,777

533

552,019

39,563

835,067

6,315

-

-

1,615,274

Declared and paid dividends, note 22(f)

-

-

-

-

-

(75,292 )

-

-

-

(75,292 )

Capitalization of retained earnings, notes 22(a)
and 22(b)

-

448,520

1,216

-

-

(449,736)

-

-

-

-

Transfer to legal reserve

-

-

-

-

41,974

(41,974 )

-

-

-

-

Gain from sale of ADR's, note 22(e)

644,000

925

-

24,267

-

-

-

-

-

25,192

Purchase of Investment shares

-

-

(14)

(146)

-

-

-

-

-

(160 )

Cumulative gain for translation of investment in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., maintained through Compañía Minera Condesa S.A., note 22(g)

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,054

-

-

1,054

Increase of nominal value of treasury shares maintained by subsidiary

-

(34,467)

(52)

34,519

-

-

-

-

-

-

Net income

-

-

-

-

-

415,715

-

-

-

415,715

Balance as of December 31, 2002

126,879,832

596,755

1,683

610,659

81,537

683,780

7,369

-

-

1,981,783

Declared and paid dividends, note 22(f)

-

-

-

-

-

(159,164)

-

-

-

(159,164 )

Investments in shares maintained at fair value,
note 2(f)

-

-

-

-

-

(5,957 )

-

209,130

-

203,173

Loss in the initial valuation of derivative instruments,
note 2(s)

-

-

-

-

-

(458,189)

-

-

-

(458,189)

Gain in the initial valuation of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments held by subsidiary,
note 2(s)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,742

1,742

Loss from change in the fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments held by subsidiary,
note 35(a)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(8,085)

(8,085 )

Transfer to legal reserve

-

-

-

-

17,749

(17,749 )

-

-

-

-

Cumulative loss for translation of investment in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., mantained through Compañía Minera Condesa S.A., note 22(g)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(36,764 )

-

-

(36,764 )

Net income

-

-

-

-

-

175,153

-

-

-

175,153

Balance as of December 31, 2003

126,879,832

596,755

1,683

610,659

99,286

217,874

(29,395 )

209,130

(6,343)

1,699,649

Declared and paid dividends, note 22(f)

-

-

-

-

-

(139,464)

-

-

-

(139,464 )

Investments in shares maintained at fair value,
note 2(f)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

47,201

-

47,201

Change in the fair value of derivative instruments of Subsidiary, note 35(a)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5,303

5,303

Transfer to legal reserve

-

-

-

-

29,990

(29,990)

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

-

912

-

-

-

912

Cumulative loss for translation of investment in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., maintained through Compañía Minera Condesa S.A., note 22(g)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(119,118)

-

-

(119,118 )

Net income

-

-

-

-

-

685,650

-

-

-

685,650

Balance as of December 31, 2004

126,879,832

596,755

1,683

610,659

129,276

734,982

(148,513)

256,331

(1,040)

2,180,133

2002

2003

2004

2004

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

US$(000)

(Note 4)

Operating activities

Collection from customers

566,562

733,646

885,646

269,767

Collection of dividends

83,098

482,025

419,782

127,865

Collection of royalties

80,560

112,354

120,136

36,593

Collection of interest

9,243

8,827

11,909

3,627

Payments to suppliers and third parties

(289,828 )

(347,109)

(388,709)

(118,401 )

Payments of exploration expenditures

(98,612 )

(128,684)

(172,215)

(52,457 )

Payments to employees

(102,048 )

(101,629)

(119,594)

(36,428 )

Payments of income tax

(30,872 )

(38,509)

(44,478 )

(13,547 )

Payments of royalties

(13,337 )

(25,976)

(27,248 )

(8,299 )

Payments of interest

(14,457 )

(8,686)

(5,170 )

(1,574 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

190,309

686,259

680,059

207,146

Investing activities

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

(66,508 )

(67,814)

(96,507 )

(29,396 )

Collections (payments) from derivative instruments settled, net

44,760

(20,812)

(73,403 )

(22,359 )

Development expenditures

(23,998 )

(38,504)

(38,611 )

(11,761 )

Increase of investment fund

-

(53,068)

(34,735 )

(10,580 )

Decrease on time deposit in local currency

-

-

(24,255 )

(7,388 )

Payments by purchase of investments in shares

(11,927 )

(4,663)

(8,084 )

(2,463 )

Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment

1,008

2,464

1,595

486

Proceeds from sale of investments in shares

4,323

3,059

330

101

Net cash used in investing activities

(52,342 )

(179,338 )

(273,670 )

(83,360 )

Financing activities

Payments of dividends, note 22(f)

(72,265 )

(159,164)

(139,464)

(42,481 )

Decrease of bank loans, net

(74,218 )

(22,921)

(10,311 )

(3,141 )

Proceeds from long-term debt

-

-

12,147

3,700

Payments of long-term debt

(12,125 )

(22,213)

(76,705 )

(23,364 )

Proceeds from sale of ADR

25,192

-

-

-

Net cash used in financing activities

(133,416 )

(204,298)

(214,333)

(65,286 )

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents during the year

4,551

302,623

192,056

58,500

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

91,377

95,928

398,551

121,398

Cash and cash equivalents at year-end

95,928

398,551

590,607

179,898

2002

2003

2004

2004

S/(000)

S/(000)

S/(000)

US$(000)

(Note 4)

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities

Net income

415,715

175,153

685,650

208,849

Add (deduct)

Depreciation

46,245

54,124

61,694

18,793

Provision for deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing, see note 32 (a)

3,552

(301,980)

37,840

11,526

Amortization of development costs

15,762

17,439

33,503

10,205

Minority interest

25,461

51,023

28,171

8,581

Loss (gain) from exposure to inflation

3,312

(321 )

22,483

6,848

Amortization of mining concessions and goodwill

17,441

15,578

15,598

4,749

Accretion expense

-

4,724

7,056

2,149

Asset impairment loss and write-off

1,634

4,691

2,889

880

Officers' compensation, note 19

6,744

49,594

2,135

650

Allowance for doubtful accounts

329

5,952

1,146

349

Net cost of retired plant and equipment

8,502

6,490

754

230

Share in affiliated companies, net of dividends

(270,865 )

(75,533 )

(160,947 )

(49,024 )

Income from sale of future production

-

-

(68,837 )

(20,968 )

Loss (gain) from change in the fair value of derivative instruments

-

647,218

(14,629 )

(4,456 )

Gain from change in the fair value of investment fund

-

(1,813 )

(5,022 )

(1,530 )

Gain on sale of plant and equipment

(898 )

(2,133 )

(157 )

(48 )

Loss (gain) on sale of shares

1,412

(267 )

(51 )

(16 )

Cumulative effect of accounting change

-

72,295

-

-

Write-off development costs

-

7,742

-

-

Loss from sale of subsidiary's shares

7,069

-

-

-

Net changes in assets and liabilities accounts

Decrease (increase) of operating assets -

Trade and other accounts receivable

(73,849 )

(16,019 )

(22,259 )

(6,779 )

Deferred stripping costs

(12,500 )

(14,329 )

-

-

Prepaid taxes and expenses

1,645

(6,432 )

(48,952 )

(14,910 )

Inventories

641

558

5,097

1,553

Increase (decrease) of operating liabilities -

Trade accounts payable and other current liabilities

(7,043 )

(7,495 )

96,897

29,515

Net cash provided by operating activities

190,309

686,259

680,059

207,146

Transactions that do not affect cash flows:

Payment of dividends through common shares of Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A., note 22(f)

3,028

-

-

-

Increase of the book value of long-lived assets

-

8,658

24,842

7,567

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

2003

2004

2005

2005

 

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

S/.(000)

US$(000)

 

 

 

 

(Note 4)

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

 

Net income

175,153

685,650

940,983

274,259

Add (deduct)

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

66,908

75,481

112,465

32,779

Loss from change in the fair value of derivative instruments

668,030

21,937

87,872

25,611

Minority interest

51,023

28,171

66,003

19,237

Amortization of development costs

16,445

33,265

34,090

9,936

Officers' compensation

49,594

2,135

26,883

7,835

Cumulative effect of accounting change

72,295

-

10,416

3,036

Asset impairment loss and write-off

12,433

2,889

9,382

2,735

Accretion expense

4,724

7,056

7,621

2,221

Net cost of retired plant and equipment

6,490

754

3,598

1,049

Amortization of other non-current assets

910

994

896

261

Loss (gain) on sale of plant and equipment

(2,133)

(157)

137

40

Allowance for doubtful accounts

5,952

1,146

76

22

Exchange difference loss (gain)

472

12,636

(1,483)

(432)

Gain from change in the fair value of investment fund

(1,813)

(5,022)

(2,503)

(730)

Provision for deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing

(301,980)

37,840

(42,836)

(12,485)

Income from sale of future production

-

(68,837)

(92,753)

(27,034)

Share in affiliated companies, net of dividends received

(75,533)

(160,947)

(562,822)

(164,040)

Loss (gain) from exposure to inflation

(793)

9,847

-

-

Gain on sale of shares

(267)

(51)

-

-

Net changes in assets and liabilities accounts

 

 

 

 

Decrease (increase) of operating assets -

 

 

 

 

Trade and other accounts receivable

(16,019)

(22,259)

(23,665)

(6,897)

Inventories

558

5,097

(29,278)

(8,533)

Prepaid taxes and expenses

(6,432)

(48,952)

(97,515)

(28,422)

Deferred stripping costs

(14,329)

-

-

-

Increase (decrease) of operating liabilities -

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable and other current liabilities

7,854

94,907

115,432

33,644

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

719,542

713,580

562,999

164,092

Transactions that did not affect cash flows:

 

 

 

 

Transfer from derivative instruments to deferred income from sale
of future production

709,963

-

172,540

50,289

Increase of the book value of long-term assets

8,658

24,842

27,967

8,226

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

  1. 1. Business activity

  2. Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (hereafter "Buenaventura") is a public company incorporated in 1953. It is engaged in the exploration (individually and in association with third parties), extraction, concentration and commercialization of polymetallic ores.

    Buenaventura operates two mining units in Peru (Uchucchacua and Orcopampa) and has a controlling interest in three Peruvian mining companies that own the Colquijirca, Antapite, Ishihuinca, Shila and Paula mines. In addition, the Company holds direct and indirect interests in a number of other mining companies; the most important of such interests is in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (hereafter "Yanacocha"), an entity in which the Company owns 43.65 percent of outstanding stock through Compañía and Sociedad Minera Condesa S.A.Cerro Verde S.A.A. (hereafter, "Condesa""Cerro Verde"), see note 12. Buenaventura also owns an electric power distribution company and a mining engineering services consulting company.

    In 1999 and 2001, Buenaventura decided to suspend exploitation activities in the Julcani and HuachocolpaRecuperada mines, respectively, and only continue to carry out exploration activities. Mineral found in Julcani during exploration activities is treated and sold. Due to the increase in the market quotations of metals, Buenaventura's management has decided to reinitiate its exploration activities in Recuperada during the first quarter of 2006.

    As of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, the number of employees at Buenaventura and its subsidiaries (together "the Company"), is as follows:

 

2003

2004

Officers

56

78

Employees

907

868

Workers

1,133

1,038

 

2,096

1,984

 

2004

2005

 

 

 

Officers

78

87

Employees

868

974

Workers

1,038

1,066

 

 

 

 

1,984

2,127

Buenaventura's legal address is Avenida Carlos Villaran Avenue 790, Santa Catalina, Lima, Peru.

The 20042005 consolidated financial statements have been approved by Management and will be presented for the approval of the Directors and Shareholders at the times established by Law. In Management's opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements will be approved without modifications in the Board of Directors' and Shareholders' meetings to be held during the first quarter of 2005.

2006. Consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20032004 were approved in the Shareholders' meeting held on March 26, 2004.31, 2005.

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the following subsidiaries:

 

Ownership percentages as of December 31,

 

 

2003

2004

 

Subsidiaries

Direct

Indirect

Direct

Indirect

Business Activities

 

%

%

%

%

 

Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A.

100.00

-

100.00

-

Provides advisory and engineering services related to the mining industry.

Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

44.83

55.17

44.83

55.17

Holds investments in S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca, Minas Conga S.R.L., and other affiliated companies engaged in mining activities. Also, it is engaged in the extraction, concentration and commercialization of gold bars and concentrates.

Compañía Minera Condesa S.A.

99.99

-

99.99

-

Holds investments in Buenaventura, Yanacocha and other affiliated companies engaged in mining activities.

Compañía Minera Colquirrumi S.A. (i)

73.63

-

90.00

-

Extraction, concentration and commercialization of polymetallic ores, principally zinc and lead. Currently is also engaged in electric power sales.

Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

99.99

0.01

99.99

0.01

Transmission of electric power to mining companies.

Contacto Corredores de Seguros S.A.

-

99.99

-

99.99

Placement of insurance contracts and provision of administrative and technical services in insurance matters.

Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

59.90

-

59.90

-

Extraction, concentration and commercialization of polymetallic ores, principally zinc and lead, through its subsidiary Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

78.04

-

78.04

-

Extraction, concentration and commercialization of gold bars and concentrates.

Metalúrgica Los Volcanes S.A.

100.00

-

100.00

-

Treatment of minerals and concentrates.

Minera Paula 49 S.A.C. (ii)

-

51.00

-

-

Extraction, concentration and commercialization gold bars.

Minas Conga S.R.L.

-

60.00

-

60.00

Owner of mining rights.

S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

20.00

40.00

20.00

40.00

Owner of the mining concessions explored and exploited by Yanacocha.

Minera La Zanja S.R.L.

-

-

53.06

-

Prospection, exploration and exploitation of mineral rights. Currently is engaged in exploration activities. It was incorporated in January 2004.

 

Ownership percentages as of December 31,

 

 

2005

2004

 

Subsidiaries

Direct

Indirect

Direct

Indirect

Business Activities

 

%

%

%

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A.

100.00

-

100.00

-

Provides advisory and engineering services related to the mining industry.

Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

44.83

55.17

44.83

55.17

Holds investments in S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca, Minas Conga S.R.L., and other affiliated companies engaged in mining activities. Additionally, it is engaged in the extraction, concentration and commercialization of gold bars and concentrates

Compañía Minera Condesa S.A.

99.99

-

99.99

-

Holds investments in Yanacocha, Buenaventura and other affiliated companies engaged in mining activities.

Compañía Minera Colquirrumi S.A.

90.00

-

90.00

-

Exploration of polymetallic metals.

Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

99.99

0.01

99.99

0.01

Transmission of electric power.

Contacto Corredores de Seguros S.A.

-

99.99

-

99.99

Placement of insurance contracts and provision of administrative and technical services in insurance matters.

Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

59.90

-

61.42

-

Extraction, concentration and commercialization of polymetallic ores, principally zinc and lead, through its subsidiary Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

78.04

-

78.04

-

Extraction, concentration and commercialization of gold bars and concentrates

Minas Conga S.R.L.

-

60.00

-

60.00

Owner of mining rights.

S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

20.00

40.00

20.00

40.00

Owner of the mining rights explored and exploited by Yanacocha.

Minera La Zanja S.R.L.

53.06

-

53.06

-

Prospection, exploration and exploitation of mineral rights. Currently is engaged in exploration activities.

Minas Poracota S.A. (i)

-

-

50.00

-

Prospection, exploration and exploitation of mineral rights. Currently is engaged in exploration activities.

Minera Minasnioc S.A.C.

60.00

-

60.00

-

Prospection, exploration and exploitation of mineral rights. Currently is engaged in exploration activities.

(i) The Shareholders' Meeting of Compañía Minera Colquirrumi held on April 20, 2004 approved to capitalize the debts with its shareholders, with the purpose of reducing its capital stock, off setting its accumulated losses,Effective December 30, 2005 and creating Series AJanuary 2, 2006, Buenaventura acquired 50% and Series B shares. As a result, the Company owns the 99.99% of Series A shares of Compañía Minera Colquirrumi, which represents an equity investment of 90% (73.63% as of December 31, 2003).

(ii) Effective October 22, 2004, Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN acquired 100%25% of the capital stock of Inversiones Mineras Aureas S.A.C.Minas Poracota S.A. (Poracota), which owned 49%respectively, in exchange for a payment of Minera Paula 49 S.A.C. TheUS$4,501,000. According to the Shareholders' Meetingsagreement signed with Teck Cominco Perú S.A. (hereafter "Teck Cominco"), if a preliminary study to be prepared by Teck Cominco and Buenaventura, indicates that there is a probability of CEDIMIN, Inversiones Mineras Aureas S.A.C. and Minera Paula 49 S.A.C. held in 2004, approvedobtaining a production greater than 300,000 ounces of gold per year, Teck Cominco will have the merger of these companies. Effective December 31, 2004, Inversiones Mineras Aureas S.A.C. and Minera Paula 49 S.A.C. were merged by CEDIMIN. The merger was recorded underright to recover its position as the purchase method. The fair valuesowner of the assets and liabilities50% of the merged companies were not significantly different from their book values atcapital stock of Poracota and to be the dateoperator of the merger.project. To this effect, Teck Cominco will prepare a feasibility study with a production of 300,000 ounces of gold, assuming the cost of this study. If the project were a smaller one, Buenaventura can opt for buying the remaining 25% of the capital stock of Poracota for US$2,250,000.

  • 2. Significant accounting principles and practices

    In the preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements, Management has followed International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) effective in Peru as of December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, which differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). A description of these differences and their effects on net income and shareholers'shareholders' equity is set forth in Notes 3938 and 40.39. The consolidated financial statements arise from the statutory consolidated financial statement presentation and include certain additional disclosures in order to conform more closely to the form and content of financial statements required by the Securities and Exchange CommisionCommission of the United States of America (the "SEC"). To the date of the consolidated financial statements, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board has approved the use of IAS 1 to 41, and the Interpretations 1 to 33.

    The main accounting principles and practices used in accounting for the transactions and in preparing the consolidated financial statements are:

    1. Restatement

      (a) Basis of Financial Statements by Inflationpresentation -

    2. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the accounting records of the company, which are restatedstated in nominal monetary terms of the date of the transactions.

      Until December 31, 2004, these consolidated financial statements were maintained in nominal Peruvian currency and adjusted to reflect changes In the effect of the changes in the acquisition power of the Peruvian currency, in accordance withNational Wholesale Price Level Index (IPM), according to the methodology approved by the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board. This methodology requiresrequired the adjustment of the non-monetary items in the consolidated financial statements considering their origin date and applying the corresponding Wholesale Price Indexes. Monetary items and foreign currency-denominated items arewere not restated because they are stated in currency of acquisition power at the consolidated balance sheet dates. The results from exposure to inflation are separately presented in the statements of income and mainly include the exchange difference loss originated by the foreign currency-denominated items. In years 2002, 2003 and

      Effective year 2005, through Resolution No.031-2004-EF/93.01 enacted on May 18, 2004, the exchange difference losses were S/6,246,000, S/472,000 and S/12,636,000, respectively.

      The variations of the acquisition power of the Peruvian currency, according to the Wholesale Price Indexes, were 1.7%, 2% and 4.9% for 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

      Through Resolution No. 031-2004-EF/93.01, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board suspended effective year 2005, the restatement of the financial statements to recognize the inflation effect. The restated balances as of December 31, 2004 will behave been considered as initial balances as of January 1, 2005. Effective 2005, theThis accounting treatment has been also adopted by tax authorities have adopted this accounting treatment for calculating the income tax.tax for the year 2005. Therefore, the Company has not recognized a result from exposure to inflation in the income of 2005, while in 2003 and 2004, a gain of S/.793,000 and a loss of S/.9,847,000, respectively, were recorded.

    3. (b) Use of estimates and assumptions -

    4. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in Peru requires Management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses duringfor the reporting periods.years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

    5. The most significant estimates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are the obsolescence supplies reserves, the useful lives and impairment of long-term assets, the determination of mineral reserves which are the basis for future cash flow estimates and units of production depreciation, asset impairments, the recoverability of deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing, the accrual for mine closing costs and the fair value of derivates instruments.

      (c) Principles of consolidation -

    6. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Buenaventura and the accounts of those subsidiaries in which it possessespossess more than 50 percent equity participation and/or exercises control. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. The minority interest is presented separately in the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of income.

      See companies included in the consolidated financial statements in Note 1.

    7. (d) Cash and cash equivalents -



    8. Cash and cash equivalents include all cash on hand and deposited in banks. For preparing the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash a balances and cash equivalentsequivalent includes cash on hand, and time deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

    9. (e) Inventories -

    10. Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated sales price obtainable in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and estimated selling and distribution expenses. Cost is determined using the weighted average method.

      The accrual for obsolescence is based on an item-by-item analysis completed by the Company's management and related amounts are charged to expense in the period in which the obsolescence is deemed to have occurred.

    11. (f) Investments in shares -

    12. Until December 31, 2002, investments in which the Company's interest is lower than 20 percent or not exercise significant influence were stated at cost, less any permanent value impairment. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company has adopted IAS 39, Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement. Under the requirements of this standard, such investments must be recorded at fair value and changes in such value must be separately presented in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders' equity. The Company has recorded a charge to retained earnings by S/5,957,000,.5,957,000, corresponding to the initial adoption of this standard. The corresponding dividends are credited to income when declared.

      Investments in entities in which the Company's ownership is greater than 20 percent but less than 50 percent or exercise significant influence are accounted for by the equity method, recognizing the Company's proportionate share in the results of the affiliates in the consolidated statements of income. The measurement and reporting currency of affiliates is the Peruvian Nuevo Sol, with the exception of Yanacocha and Cerro Verde whose measurement and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The translation of the financial statements of Yanacocha and Cerro Verde results in exchange differences arising from translating (a) income and expense items at the exchange rates prevailing on the individual transaction dates, (b) assets and liabilities at the closing exchange rate, and (c) equity accounts at the historical exchange rates. The net exchange difference is classified in equity until further disposal of the net investment.

      The purchase method is used to record business acquisitions. Under this method, the assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded at fair value and any excess ofdifference between the amount paid overand the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired is recognized in the balance sheetrecorded as a mining concession (inin the case of a mining company)caption "property, plant and equipment" (when the difference corresponds to mineral reserves) or goodwill (in the case of a company engaged in other activities).goodwill.

      For companies in which the Company's ownership is between 20 and 50 percent, any amount paid in excess of bookfair value of the shares is reported in the Investment caption. The Company presents in this caption amounts paid over the bookfair value of Yanacocha and Cerro Verde shares, and amortizes this amount using the units-of-production method, based on proven and probable reserves, see Note 12(g).12.

    13. (g) Property, plant and equipment -

    14. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment loss. Maintenance and minor repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures that result in future economic benefits, beyond those originally contemplated in standards of performance for the existing assets, are capitalized.

      Depreciation is calculated under the straight-line method of accounting considering the followinglower of estimated useful lives:lives of the asset or estimated reserves of the mining unit. The useful lives are the following:

     

    Years

    Buildings, constructions and other

    10 and 20

    Machinery and equipment

    5 and 10

    Transportation units

    5

    Furniture and fixtures

    8 and 10

    Computer equipment

    4

    Mineral rights are amortized using the units-of-production method.

    The useful life assigned and the depreciation method chosen by the Company are reviewed periodically to ensure that the method and the depreciation period are consistent with the economic benefit and life expectations for use of property, plant and equipment items.

  • Interest expense allocable to the cost of developing mining properties and to constructing new facilities is capitalized until assets are ready for their intended use.

    (h) Exploration and mine development costs -

  • Exploration costs are charged to expense as incurred. When it is determined that a mineral property can be economically developed, the costs incurred to develop it, including the costs to further delineate the ore body and remove overburden to initially expose the ore body, are capitalized. In addition, expenditures that increase significantly the economic reserves in the mining units under exploitation are capitalized. Mine development costs are amortized using the units-of-production method, based on proven and probable reserves. On-going development expenditures to maintain production are charged to operations as incurred.

  • Joint venture agreements -
  • The Company has entered into joint venture agreements with other mining companies for the purpose of exploring potential mining sites. The associated exploration costs are recognized using the pro-rata share method.

  • (i) Mining concessions and goodwill -
  • The mining concessions balance corresponds to the amounts paid in excess of fair value of net assets acquired in the purchase of Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN (Cedimin), Inversiones Colquijirca S.A. (Colquijirca), Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A. (El Brocal), Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A. (Conenhua) and Minera Paula 49 S.A.C. (Paula) and Minas Poracota S.A.( Poracota). The mining concession balances corresponding to Colquijirca, El Brocalconcessions are shown as a part of the property, plant and Paulaequipment caption and represent the ownership of the mining sites which contains the mineral reserves acquired. The mining concessions are amortized using the units-of-production method, whilebased on the balances corresponding to Cediminproved and Conenhua are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of 15 and 10 years, respectively.probable reserves.

    Annually, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of mining concessions and assesses whether any potential impairment issues exist respective to recoverability. If it is evident that the mining concessions and the goodwill are impaired, the Company provides for the impairment loss in the consolidated statements of income.

  • (j) Impairment of assets -

  • The Company reviews for and evaluates the potential impact of impairment on its assets when events or changes in circumstance occur that indicate the book value may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the book value of an asset exceeds the higher of its net selling price or value in use. The value in use of an asset is generally calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to be earned from continual use of the asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. An impairment loss recognized in a previous year is reversed if events or changes occur that indicate the estimates used when the impairment loss was recognized should be adjusted to reflect a more favorable cash flow scenario. The future cash flow assumptions used include, among other items, estimates of recoverable ounces and metric tons,tones, estimates of realizable prices and costs, and estimates of production quantities. Assumptions in which estimated future cash flows are based are subject to risk and uncertainty. Differences between assumptions and market conditions and/or the Company's development profile could have a material effect on the financial situation and results of operations of the Company.

  • (k) Accruals -

  • An accrual is recognized only when the Company has a present obligation (legal or implicit)constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that resources of the Company will be required to settle the obligation, and the related amount can be reasonably estimated. Accruals are revised periodically and are adjusted to reflect the best available information at the date of the consolidated balance sheets.

  • (l) Accrual for mine closing costs -

  • See note 3(a) for further information about the accounting change.

  • (m) Deferred stripping costs -

  • The subsidiary El Brocal has deferred certain costs incurred inSee note 3(b) for further information about the expansion of Tajo Norte mining site (the expected life of Tajo Norte is 8 years) with the intent to reasonably match revenues and production costs. Those costs are commonly referred as "deferred stripping costs" and are incurred in mining activities that are associated with the removal of waste rock.accounting change.

    The deferred accounting stripping method used by El Brocal is generally accepted in the mining industry where mining operations have diverse grades and waste-to-ore ratios; however, some mining companies expense waste removal costs as incurred. If El Brocal were to expense stripping costs as incurred, there could be greater volatility in the period-to-period results of operations.

    In order to calculate the amount of deferred stripping cost to record as normal period expense, Management obtains a coefficient by dividing the estimated tons of waste material to move by the estimated tons of mineral to be extracted during the useful life of the related area. This coefficient is estimated to be 8.69 MT of waste material requiring to be moved to obtain 1 MT of extracted mineral (8.18 MT of waste material requiring to be moved to obtain 1 MT of extracted mineral as of December 31, 2003). As of December 31, 2004, the actual coefficient was 8.94 (11.13 as of December 31, 2003).

    Costs related to additional quantities of waste that must be moved to obtain 1 MT of mineral are deferred when the actual waste material extracted is higher than the estimate; likewise, these costs are amortized when actual waste mineral extraction is lower than the estimate. The amortization of the deferred stripping costs will be reflected in the consolidated statements of income over the life of the Tajo Norte area, based on proven and probable reserves, so that no unamortized balance remains at mine closure (there were no amortization expenses in prior years and in the current year). Management expects to begin the amortization of the deferred stripping costs in 2006.

  • (n) Recognition of revenues, costs and expenses -
  • Sales of concentrates are recorded at the time of shipment in the case of export sales or, when the concentrates physically pass to the customer's warehouse for domestic sales. Sales are recorded at estimated value according to preliminary billings. The sales amount is then adjusted in the period in which final billings are released. When it is evident that the quotations to be used in the final billings are lower than those used in preliminary billings, the excess is reversed in the period in which final prices are known.

    Sales of ounces of gold are recorded at the time of the delivery and passage of the title rights of such ounces to the client.

    Costs and expenses are recorded on an accrual basis.

  • (o) Foreign currency transactions -

  • Transactions occurring in a foreign currency are recorded in local Peruvian currency by applying to the foreign currency amount the exchange rate at the transaction date. Exchange gains and losses resulting from differences between the closing exchange rate and the exchange rate used to initially record transactions, are recognized in the consolidated statements of income in the period in which they arise, see Note 5, and are presented in the caption "gain (loss) from exposure to inflation".arise.

  • (p) Income tax and workers' profit sharing -

  • The current income tax and workers' profit sharing balances are calculated and recorded pursuant to current legal regulations effective in Peru. Following the balance sheet liability method, the Company recognizes the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of assets and liabilities to the extent that such differences result in a deferred tax liability. ShouldIf a deferred asset arise,arises, it is not recognized unless it is more likely than not that it will be recoverable.

  • (q) Contingencies -

  • Loss contingencies are recorded in the financial statements when they areit is probable oftheir occurrence and they can be fairly determined.reasonably estimated. In other cases,case, they are only disclosed in notes to the financial statements. The loss contingencies with probability of resulting in a real loss can be classified as follows:

    - Probable: a contingency that generates an actual obligation and therefore, must be accrued.

    - Possible: a contingency whose result is uncertain due to its current status and therefore, must not be accrued but disclosed.

    - Remote: a contingency with a reduced probability of occurrence and therefore, must not be accrued or disclosed.

    Contingent assets are not recognized in the financial statements until their realizability is certain;statements; however, they are disclosed in notes to the financial statements if it is probable that such contingent assets will be realized.

  • (r) Derivative instruments -

  • Until December 31, 2002, the Company disclosedused to disclose in notes to the consolidated financial statements the fair value of the derivative instruments. Effective January 1, 2003, IAS 39, Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement, is in force. Following we describethe description of the changes resulting from the adoption of this standard:

    - The fair value of derivative contracts qualifying as cash flow hedges are reflected as assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. To the extent these hedges are effective in offsetting forecasted cash flows from the sale of production, changes in fair value are deferred in an equity account. Amounts deferred in such account are reclassified to Sales when the underlying production is sold. The effect of the initial adoption of this standard by the subsidiary El Brocal resulted in a credit to the equity account "unrealized loss on derivative instruments" of S/1,742,000..1,742,000.

    - The fair value of derivative contracts not qualifying as cash flow hedges are reflected as assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in fair values are recorded in the caption "gain (loss)"Gain (Loss) from Change in the Fair Value of Derivative Instruments" in the consolidated statements of income. The effect of the initial adoption of this standard resulted in a charge to retained earnings of 2003 by S/458,189,000..458,189,000.

    - The value ofGain and losses on derivative contracts qualifying as normal sales"normal sales" are initially deferred in the consolidated balance sheets and then recognized in income in the years in which the Company makes a physical delivery of the committed ounces of gold and tonnestones of minerals, see note 35.34(b).

  • (s) Treasury shares -


  • The Company has common and investment shares under treasury. The nominal values of these shares restated by inflation, are presented net of the capital stock and investment shares amounts. The difference between the nominal values restated by inflation and the cost of such shares is presented as a reduction in the additional capital caption of the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders' equity.

    The effect of the dividends income arising from the treasury shares held by a subsidiary are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

  • (t) Basic and diluted earnings per share -

  • Basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated based on the weighted average number of common and investment shares outstanding at the date of the consolidated balance sheets; treasury shares have been excluded from the calculation.

  • (u) Comparative financial statements -

  • FiguresFor improving the presentation of Consolidated Financial Statements, the company has made some reclassifications for the years 2003 and 2004.

    - The amortization of goodwill of S/.910,000 in 2003 and S/.994,000 in 2004, which used to be presented as other income (expenses) net, is currently presented as operating expense.

    - The realized deferred income from sale of future production of S/.68,837,000 in 2004, which used to be presented as other income (expenses), is currently presented as an operating revenue.

    - The mining concessions of S/.151,345,000 have been reclassified from the mining concessions and goodwill caption to the property, plant and equipment caption in the consolidated financial statementsbalance sheet as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 have been inflation adjusted to reflect the change in the National Wholesale Price index (IPM) at December 31, 2004, using an inflation factor of 1.049.

    In order to improve the presentation of its consolidated financial statements, the Company made the following reclassications in year 2004:2004.

    - The "amortizationamortization of mining concessions of S/.14,668,000 in 2003 and S/.14,604,000 in 2004, have been reclassified from the amortization of mining concessions and goodwill"goodwill caption is now presented as operating expensesto the depreciation and amortization caption in the consolidated statements of income. This caption was presented as Other income (expense) in year 2003.

    - Mineral rights of S/13,965,000 as of December 31, 2003 is now presented as part of Property, Plant and Equipment. Until December 31, 2003, this amount was presented in a separate caption.

  • (v) New accounting pronouncements -
  • As of today,Through Resolutions N' 034-2005-EF/93.01 and N' 036-2005-EF/93.01 dated March 2, 2005 and December 15, 2005, respectively, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board (CNC in Spanish), approved the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has completed its review process of(IAS) revised and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and has issued new accounting standards.by the International Accounting Standards Committee. These standards are internationally in force in Peru effective January 1, 2005; however, they are pending2006.

    Through Resolution N' 038-2005-EF/93.01 of approval byFebruary 3, 2006, CNC approved to suspend until December 31, 2006, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board. mandatory application of the IAS 21 "Effect of the Variations in the Exchange Rates of Foreign Currencies" (revised in 2003), related to the identification and use of a functional currency. As well, CNC resolved to maintain the equity method in the preparation of the individual financial statements.

    The Company is in process of evaluating the impact ofeffects in its consolidated financial statements from the adoption of the revised IAS and the new IFRS issued.

    Following we present a summary of the main changes:

    (i) Improvement project of the IASB -

    As part of this Project, 15 standards were reviewed with the objective of reducing or eliminating alternative treatments, redundancies and conflicts within the standards, as well as to achieve US GAAP convergence and to carry out other improvements. This project modified the following IAS:

    - IAS 1 (revised in 2003): it modifies the presentation of the minority interest and other disclosures.

    - IAS 8, 10, 16, 17, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33 and 40 (revised in 2003) and IAS 39 (revised in 2004): these standards do not contain changes that could significantly affect the consolidated financial statements or the accounting policies of the Company.

    - IAS 21 (revised in 2003): it incorporates guides and requisites to determine the functional currency of the entities.

    - IAS 24 (revised in 2003): it will affect the identification of the related parties and some other disclosures with related parties.

    (ii) As part of the revision of the standard of business combinations, the IASB issued IFRS 3, Business Combinations. Additionally, it revised IAS 36, Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and IAS 38, Intangible Assets.

    (iii) New International Financial Reporting Standards:

    IFRS 2 - Share-based payments

    IFRS 3 - Business Combinations

    This IFRS replaces IAS 22, Business Combinations, and the related interpretations (SIC 9, 22 and 28). According to the provisions of IFRS 3:

    - Goodwill is not subject to amortization beginning January 1, 2005;

    - Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2004 will be eliminated by reducing the corresponding cost;

    - Effective January 1, 2006, goodwill is subject to an annual impairment test.

    IFRS 4 - Insurance contracts

    IFRS 5 - Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations

    IFRS 6 - Exploration and Evaluation of Mineral Resources

  • 3. Change in an accounting principle
  • (a) Effective January 1, 2003, the Company and its affiliate,affiliated Yanacocha made an accounting change related to the provision for mine closure. Following, we describe the accounting changes, and the cumulative effect as of January 1, 2003:

    1. (i) Until December 31, 2002, the Company recordedused to record the obligation for mine closure when the related amount could be fairly estimated, which normally occurred at end of the life mine. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company records such liability when a legally enforceable obligation arises for mine closing, independently of the full depletion of the reserves. Once such obligation has been appropriately measured, it is recorded by creating a liability equal to the amount of the obligation and recording a corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related long-lived assets (development costs and property, plant and equipment). As time passes, the amount of the obligation changes, resulting inrecording an accretion expense; additionally, the capitalized cost is depreciated and/or amortized based on the useful lives of the related asset. Any difference in the settlement of the liability will be recorded in the results of the period in which such settlement occurs. The changes in the fair value of the ob ligationobl igation or useful life of the related assets that occur from the revision of the initial estimates should be recorded as an increase or decrease in the book value of the obligation and the related long-lived asset.

    2. The cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle, net of the workers' profit sharing, income tax and minority interest, was a loss of S/20,711,000;.20,711,000; this amount is presented in the caption "cumulative effect of change accounting change forprinciple due to mine closing costs"closing" in the consolidated statements of income.

      1. Until December 31, 2002, the affiliate,affiliated Yanacocha used to accrue the mine closureclosing costs and charge to income over the expected operating lives of the mines using the unit-of-production method. Effective January 1, 2003, Yanacocha records such obligation using an accounting treatment similar to the one used by Buenaventura and its subsidiaries.

    The cumulative effect of the change in the accounting principle, net of workers' profit sharing and income tax, was a loss of S/51,584,000,.51,584,000, which is presented as "cumulative effect of change in accounting change forprinciple due to mine closing costs".

  • in the consolidated statements of income.

  • (b) Until December 31, 2004, with the intent to reasonably match revenues and current production costs, El Brocal was deferring certain costs incurred in the expansion of the Tajo Norte mining site. These costs are commonly referred as "deferred stripping costs" and are incurred in mining activities that are associated with the removal of waste rock to access the ore body. Costs related to additional quantities of waste that must be moved to obtain one MT of mineral were deferred when the actual waste material extracted was higher than the estimate; likewise, these costs were amortized when actual waste mineral extraction was lower than the estimate.

    Effective January 1, 2005, El Brocal considers the deferred stripping costs incurred during the production stage as variable production costs that should be included in the cost of the inventories produced. This accounting change allows El Brocal to adopt international industry practices.

    The condensedcumulative effect of this accounting change, net of workers' profit sharing, income tax and minority interest, was a loss of S/.10,416,000, which is separately presented in the caption "cumulative effect of change in accounting principle due to stripping costs" in the consolidated statements of income. This accounting change had no effect in the consolidated financial statements of 2004 due to the fact that the stripping costs incurred in such period were treated as in the current period.

    In 2003, this change would have represented in the consolidated statements of income foran increase in the year 2002 thatoperating costs from S/.456,764,000 to S/.471,093,000 and a decrease in the net income from S/.175,153,000 to S/.172,490,000. In addition, the basic and diluted earnings per share would had result if the Company would had given retroactive effecthave decreased from S/.1.38 per share to the accounting change follows:S/.1.36 per share.

    2002

    S/(000)

    Operating revenues

    Net sales

    575,707

    Royalties income

    82,350

    Total revenues

    658,057

    Costs of operation

    Operating costs

    273,786

    Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites

    78,661

    Depreciation

    43,510

    Total cost of operation

    395,957

    Gross margin

    262,100

    Total operating expenses

    160,236

    Operating income

    101,864

    Other income (expenses)

    Share in affiliated companies

    334,654

    Accretion expense

    (4,017 )

    Other

    12,405

    Total other income, net

    343,042

    Income before workers' profit sharing, income tax and minority interest

    444,906

    Provision for workers' profit sharing

    (1,476)

    Provision for income tax

    (26,383 )

    Income before minority interest

    417,047

    Minority interest

    (24,976 )

    Net income

    392,071

    Basic and diluted earnings per share

    3.08

  • 4. Convenience Translation of Peruvian Nuevos Soles amounts into U.S. dollar amounts
  • The consolidated financial statements are stated in Peruvian Nuevos Soles. U.S. dollar amounts are included solely for the convenience of the reader, and were obtained by dividing Peruvian Nuevos Soles amounts by the exchange rate for selling U.S. dollars at December 31, 20042005 (S/3.283.3.431 to US$1), as published by the Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros (Superintendent of Bank and Insurance, or "SBS"). The convenience translation should not be construed as a representation that the Peruvian Nuevos Soles amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the foregoing or any other rate of exchange.

  • 5. Foreign currency transactions

  • Translations to foreign currency are completed using exchange rates prevailing inpublished by the market.Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros y AFP. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the average exchange rate in the market for U.S. dollar transactions wasrates published by this Institution were S/3.280.3.429 for buying and S/3.283.3.431 for selling (S/3.461.3.280 for buying and S/3.464.3.283 for selling as of December 31, 2003).2004) and have been applied for the assets and liabilities accounts.

    As of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, the Company had the following assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency:

     

    2003

    2004

     

    US$(000)

    US$(000)

    Assets

     

     

    Cash and cash equivalents

    88,723

    161,786

    Investment funds

    15,116

    26,515

    Trade and other accounts receivable (including current portion)

    23,485

    30,699

    Account receivable from affiliates

    10,117

    13,923

     

    137,441

    232,923

    Liabilities

     

     

    Bank loans

    6,443

    3,900

    Trade accounts payable

    7,038

    12,703

    Derivative instruments

    112,203

    103,192

    Other current liabilities

    1,271

    5,516

    Long-term debt (including current portion)

    35,322

    15,807

     

    162,277

    141,118

    Net asset (liability) position

    (24,836 )

    91,805

    The translation of foreign currency assets and liabilities in 2004 resulted in a net loss of S/12,636,000 (S/472,000 in 2003). These amounts are included in the consolidated statements of income as "gain (loss) from exposure to inflation."

     

    2004

    2005

     

     

    Equivalent to

     

    Equivalent to

     

    US$(000)

    S/.(000)

    US$(000)

    S/.(000)

    Assets

     

     

     

     

    Cash and cash equivalents

    161,786

    530,658

    88,611

    303,847

    Investment funds

    26,515

    86,969

    15,423

    52,885

    Trade and other accounts receivable (including current portion)

    30,699

    100,693

    17,038

    58,424

    Account receivable from affiliates

    13,935

    45,708

    19,202

    65,844

     

    232,935

    764,028

    140,274

    481,000

    Liabilities

     

     

     

     

    Bank loans

    3,900

    12,804

    7,500

    25,733

    Trade accounts payable

    12,703

    41,704

    8,328

    28,573

    Derivative instruments

    103,192

    338,779

    66,206

    227,155

    Other current liabilities

     

     

     

     

    - Accrual for mine closing costs

    20,567

    67,521

    26,922

    92,371

    - Stock appreciation rights

    14,330

    47,047

    17,291

    59,324

    - Others

    5,516

    18,109

    6,911

    23,712

    Long-term debt (including current portion)

    15,645

    51,363

    874

    2,998

     

    175,853

    577,327

    134,032

    459,866

    Net asset position

    57,082

    186,701

    6,242

    21,134

  • 6. Cash and cash equivalents

    1. (a) This item is made up as follows:

    2.  

      2003

      2004

       

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

       

       

       

      Cash

      2,105

      2,893

      Demand deposit accounts

      16,731

      108,102

      Saving accounts

      559

      -

      Time deposits

       

       

      In local currency

      73,052

      -

      In foreign currency (b)

      306,104

      479,612

       

       

       

      Cash balances included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

      398,551

      590,607

      Time deposits in local currency with an original maturity of more than 90 days (c)

      -

      24,255

       

      398,551

      614,862

       

      2004

      2005

       

      S/.(000)

      S/.(000)

       

       

       

      Cash

      2,893

      1,080

      Demand deposits accounts

      108,102

      79,049

      Time deposits (b)

      479,612

      251,973

      Cash balances considered in the consolidated statements of cash flow

      590,607

      332,102

      Time deposits with an original maturity of more than 90 days

      24,255

      -

       

       

       

       

      614,862

      332,102

    3. (b) As of December 31, 2004, the Company maintained2005, it corresponds principally the followingto time deposits in foreign currency:
    4. -for US$60,000,00071,851,000, with annual interest rates ranging from 1.98%4.030 % to 2.67%5.425%, and maturities from 1830 to 30 days.

      -90 days (time deposits for US$86,000,000146,000,000 with annual interest rates ranging from 1.96% to 2.15% and maturities from 18 to 90 days.

    5. As2.67% as of December 31, 2004, it corresponds to a time deposit in Peruvian currency for S/24,255,000, at an interest rate of 5.7 percent, with maturities from March to September 2005. With the purpose of hedging the foreign currency exchange risk associated to such, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract for US$7,414,000 at an exchange rate of S/3.574 for each U.S. dollar, and stated maturities similar to the time deposits, see note 35.
  • 2004).

    7. Investment funds

    1. (a) This item is made up as follows:

    2.  

      2003

       

      2004

       

      S/(000)

       

      S/(000)

       

       

       

       

      Variable-investsment fund

      54,881

       

      52,155

      Investment fund in process of liquidation (b)

      -

       

      34,816

       

      54,881

       

      86,971

       

      2004

      2005

       

      S/.(000)

      S/.(000)

       

       

       

      Variable Investment fund

      52,155

      52,884

      Investment fund in process of liquidation (b)

      34,816

      -

       

      86,971

      52,884

      As of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, this caption includes variable investment funds under the administration of Compass Group S.A., which are carried at fair value. The change in the fair value of the investment funds held during 2004 was S/5,022,000 (S/1,813,000 during 2003) and has been accounted for as a financial income in the consolidated statements of income, see note 30.

    3. (b) As of December 31, 2004, the Company settled this fund. The cash was available for the Company on January 18, 2005.

  • 8. Trade accounts receivable

  • This item is made up as follows:

    2003

    2004

    2004

    2005

    S/(000)

    S/.(000)

     

    Doe Run Perú S.R.L.

    13,092

    33,196

    Consorcio Minero S.A.

    17,411

    23,416

    BHL Perú S.A.C.

    3,379

    18,209

    18,209

    17,711

    Consorcio Minero S.A.

    44,249

    17,411

    Refinería de Cajamarquilla S.A.

    2,479

    7,438

    AyS S.A.

    8,479

    4,195

    Mitsui & Co. Precious Metals

     

    16,334

    16,334

    -

    Johnson Matthey

    -

    16,292

    16,292

    -

    Doe Run Perú S.R.L.

    13,059

    13,092

    A y S S.A.

    3,998

    8,479

    Refinería de Cajamarquilla S.A.

    1,774

    2,479

    Other

    7,807

    4,765

    Others

    4,765

    7,398

    74,266

    97,061

     

    97,061

    93,354

    Trade accounts receivable are denominated in U.S. dollars, have current maturity, do not earn no interest and do not have specific guarantees.

    In order to facilitate the collection of the long-term debt maintained with Banco de Crédito del Perú and BBVA Banco Continental, El Brocal has gave up to these entities the cash inflows from two clients.

    In Management's opinion, there is no need to record anthe allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover bad debt risks at the date of the consolidated balance sheets.

  • 9. Other accounts receivable, net

    1. (a) This item is made up as follows:

     

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Other accounts receivable

    8,573

    12,287

    Claims to Tax Authorities (b)

    4,048

    4,048

    Advances to suppliers and third parties

    14,844

    3,305

    Loans to employees and officers

    1,712

    1,896

    Interest receivable

    1,246

    1,769

    Account receivable from BHL - Perú S.A.C., related to sale of

     

     

    Minera Huallanca S.A.C.'s shares

    2,265

    -

    Advances given to a contractor (GyM S.A.)

    1,800

    -

    Accounts receivable from Compañía Minera El Palomo S.A.

    8,366

    -

     

    42,854

    23,305

    Allowance for doubtful accounts (c)

    (14,375 )

    (6,483 )

     

    28,479

    16,822

    Non current portion

    (5,008)

    (4,574)

    Current portion

    23,471

    12,248

     

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

    Value added tax receivable, note 21(d)

    -

    8,310

    Doubtful account from sale of shares

    4,942

    4,942

    Claims to tax authorities (b)

    4,048

    4,048

    Advances to suppliers and third parties

    3,305

    3,159

    Loans to employees

    1,896

    2,543

    Interest receivable

    1,769

    265

    Other accounts receivable

    7,345

    7,315

     

    23,305

    30,582

     

     

     

    Allowance for doubtful accounts (c)

    (6,483)

    (6,449)

     

    16,822

    24,133

    Non - current portion

    (4,574)

    (5,044)

     

     

     

    Current portion

    12,248

    19,089

  • (b) It corresponds to income tax payments of 2001, made in excess to Tax Administration. The Company is asking for a refund of these payments. In Management's and its legal advisors' opinion, this amount will be recovered once the claim process is over.
  • (c) Movement of the allowance for doubtful accounts is shown below:

  • bellow:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Beginning balance

    10,916

    11,066

    14,375

    11,066

    14,375

    6,483

    Accrual for the year, note 28

    329

    5,952

    1,146

    Result from exposure to inflation

    (179 )

    298

    (672 )

    Accrual for the year, note 26

    5,952

    1,146

    76

    Result from the exposure to inflation

    298

    (672)

    -

    Write-off

    -

    (2,941 )

    (8,366 )

    (2,941)

    (8,366)

    (110)

    Ending balance

    11,066

    14,375

    6,483

    14,375

    6,483

    6,449

    In Management's opinion, the allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover bad debt risk at the date of the consolidated balance sheets.

  • 10. Inventories, net

    1. (a) This item is made up as follows:

    2004

    2005

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Spare parts and supplies

    50,303

    54,311

    54,311

    55,852

    Products in process

    6,968

    17,574

    17,574

    24,624

    Finished products

    26,579

    6,975

    6,975

    32,067

    83,850

    78,860

     

    78,860

    112,543

     

    Slow moving and obsolescence supplies reserves (b)

    (6,618)

    (9,507)

    (9,507)

    (18,166)

    77,232

    69,353

     

    69,353

    94,377

    The Company expects to use its supplies inventory in the normal course of operations. An immaterial amount related to supplies with slow turnover is classified as a current asset within this caption.

    The inventories to be shipped by El Brocal guarantee certain loans maintained by this subsidiary, see note 17.

  • (b) The reserve for supplies had the following movements during 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004:
  • 2005:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Beginning balance

    6,081

    6,285

    6,618

    6,285

    6,618

    9,507

    Accrual for the year

    204

    624

    2,889

    Write - off

    -

    (291 )

    -

    Accrual for the year, note 23

    624

    2,889

    9,382

    Write-off

    (291)

    -

    (723)

     

     

    Ending balance

    6,285

    6,618

    9,507

    6,618

    9,507

    18,166

     

    In Management's opinion, the reserve above created is sufficient to cover the risks of slow moving and obsolete supplies at the date of the consolidated balance sheets.

  • 11. Prepaid taxes and expenses

    1. (a) This item is made up as follows:

    2004

    2005

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Value added tax credit

    17,276

    21,772

    21,772

    24,464

    Additional income tax prepayment(b)

    11,451

    Royalties paid in advance

    1,218

    4,680

    Pre-paid insurance

    2,812

    4,473

    Tax on net assets

    -

    2,708

    Income tax credit

    28,988

    14,497

    14,497

    2,322

    Additional income tax prepayment(b)

    -

    11,451

    Pre-paid insurance

    3,790

    2,812

    Others

    3,042

    3,998

    Other

    2,780

    5,489

    53,096

    54,530

     

    Current portion

    (45,544 )

    (40,471 )

    Non current portion (b)

    7,552

    14,059

    54,530

    55,587

     

    Less - Current portion

    (40,471)

    (43,182)

     

     

    Non - current portion (c)

    14,059

    12,405

     

    (b) On November 13, 2004, the Peruvian Constitutional Court enacted a sentence by means of which the Additional Income Tax Advance was considered unconstitutional; consequently, this advance is no longer in force effective such date. Buenaventura has applied for its devolution in accordance with the regulations of the Peruvian Tax Code. In management's opinion, this excess payment with be recovered in the short-term.

  • (c) As of December 31, 2004 and 2005, it mainly includes the value added tax originated by the exploration activities of Minera La Zanja S.R.L. In Management's opinion, this credit will be offset with the future value added tax liability.
  • liability to be generated when the exploitation activities begin.

  • 12. Investments in shares

    1. (a) This item is made up as follows:

     

    Equity ownership

    Amount

     

    2003

    2004

    2003

    2004

     

    %

    %

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Investments carried at fair value

     

     

     

     

    Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A. (d)

    9.17

    9.17

    223,399

    270,600

    Ferrovías Central Andino S.A.

    10.00

    10.00

    2,207

    2,207

    Others

     

     

    2,233

    925

     

     

     

    227,839

    273,732

    Equity method investments (c)

     

     

     

     

    Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (f)

    43.65

    43.65

     

     

    Equity share

     

     

    1,101,045

    1,152,188

    Mining concession, net (g)

     

     

    113,850

    103,866

     

     

     

    1,214,895

    1,256,054

    Others

     

     

    301

    1,561

     

     

     

    1,215,196

    1,257,615

     

     

     

    1,443,035

    1,531,347

     

    Equity ownership

    Amount

     

    2004

    2005

    2004

    2005

     

    %

    %

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

     

    Equity method investments (c)

     

     

     

     

    Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (d)

    43.65

    43.65

     

     

    Equity share (e)

     

     

    1,152,188

    1,714,424

    Mining concession, net (f)

     

     

    103,866

    94,245

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1,256,054

    1,808,669

     

     

     

     

     

    Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.

     

     

     

     

    Equity share (k)

    -

    18.299

    -

    491,933

    Mining concession, net (l)

     

     

    -

    197,754

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    -

    689,687

    Investment carried at fair value

     

     

     

     

    Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. (i)

    9.17

    -

    270,600

    -

    Ferrovías Central Andino S.A.

    10.00

    10.00

    2,207

    2,207

    Others

     

     

    925

    1,531

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    273,732

    3,738

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Others

     

     

    1,561

    173

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1,531,347

    2,502,267

  • (b) The detail of share in affiliated companies' incomecompanies is:
  • 2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

    Minera Yanacocha S.R.L.

    353,873

    558,103

    575,188

    558,103

    575,188

    744,710

    Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.

    -

    125,567

    Others

    90

    (545 )

    670

    (545)

    670

    471

    353,963

    557,558

    575,858

     

     

     

    557,558

    575,858

    870,748

     

  • (c) The amount of equity participation in affiliates ishas been determined from audited financial statements of each affiliate as of December 31, 20032004 and 2004.
  • 2005.

    Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.

  • In 2004, the Company recorded a debit to investment and a credit to a separate equity account of S/47,201,000 to carry the investment in Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A. to its fair value (quotation price in the Lima Stock Exchange) as of December 31, 2004 (S/209,130,000 as of December 31, 2003). In addition, in 2003, the Company charged S/5,957,000 to retained earnings, corresponding to the initial adoption of the accounting policy, as further explained in note 2(f).
  • In 2004, the Company received cash dividends from Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A. for S/4,871,000, see note 31.
  • Minera Yanacocha S.R.L.

  • The movement of the equity investment in Yanacocha is as follows:
  •  

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Yanacocha's equity at beginning of year

    1,914,543

    2,554,932

    2,547,851

    Participation percentage

    43.65 %

    43.65 %

    43.65 %

    Company's participation in Yanacocha's
    equity as of January 1st ,

    835,698

    1,115,228

    1,112,137

    Elimination of intercompany gains (*)

    (13,170 )

    (12,130 )

    (11,092 )

    Balance of investment at beginning
    of year

    822,528

    1,103,098

    1,101,045

    Participation in Yanacocha's income

    361,546

    567,282

    583,268

    Participation in the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

    -

    (51,584 )

    -

    Dividends received, note 12(h)

    (83,070 )

    (482,025)

    (414,911)

    Realization of intercompany gains (*)

    1,040

    1,038

    1,904

    Cumulative translation gain (loss)

    1,054

    (36,764 )

    (119,118)

    Balance at year-end

    1,103,098

    1,101,045

    1,152,188

    (d) Economic activity -

    (*) The elimination of related inter-company gains corresponds to profits generated in past years, and is presented net of the investment in Yanacocha for reporting purposes. The Company increases the investment and recognizes a gain in the share in affiliated companies as Yanacocha depreciates and amortizes the acquired assets.

    The participation in Yanacocha's income in the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 is mainly originated by higher sales (quantity and quotation), offset by increases of cash cost per ounce sold, as shown below:

    Year

    Sales

    Average quotation

    Quantity of ounces sold

    Cash costs per ounce sold

     

    US$(000)

    US$

    (in million)

    US$

    2002

    714,813

    311

    2.29

    134

    2003

    1,036,370

    363

    2.86

    129

    2004

    1,249,882

    411

    3.04

    147

  • The movement of the amount paid over book value of Yanacocha's shares (mining concession), is as follows:
  •  

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Balance at beginning of year

    124,067

    113,850

    Amortization

    (10,217 )

    (9,984 )

    Balance at year-end

    113,850

    103,866

  • Yanacocha represents the most significant investment. The Company's shareinvestment of Yanacocha earnings was significant as compared to Buenaventura's net income in 2002, 2003 and 2004. Presented below is selected information about Yanacocha:
  • Economic activity -

    Buenaventura. Yanacocha is engaged in the exploration for and exploitation of gold in the open pit mines of Carachugo, San José, Maqui Maqui, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua; all mines are located in the department of Cajamarca, Peru. Chaupiloma is the legal owner of the mineral rights on the mining concessions exploited by Yanacocha.

    (e) Investment in Yanacocha -

    The movement of the equity investment in Yanacocha is as follows:

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

    Yanacocha's equity at beginning of year

    2,554,932

    2,547,851

    2,662,511

    Participation percentage

    43.65%

    43.65%

    43.65%

     

     

     

     

    Company's participation in Yanacocha's

    equity at beginning of year

    1,115,228

    1,112,137

    1,162,186

    Elimination of intercompany gains (*)

    (12,130)

    (11,092)

    (9,998)

     

     

     

     

    Balance of investment at beginning
    of year

    1,103,098

    1,101,045

    1,152,188

    Participation in Yanacocha's income

    567,282

    583,268

    752,908

    Participation in the cumulative effect of

    change in accounting principle

    (51,584)

    -

    -

    Dividends received, note 37(a)

    (482,025)

    (414,911)

    (264,034)

    Realization of intercompany gains (*)

    1,038

    1,904

    1,423

    Cumulative translation gain (loss)

    (36,764)

    (119,118)

    71,939

     

     

     

     

    Balance at year-end

    1,101,045

    1,152,188

    1,714,424

     

     

     

     

    (*) The elimination of related inter-company gains corresponds to profits generated in past years, and is presented net of the investment in Yanacocha for reporting purposes. The Company increases the investment and recognizes a gain in the share in affiliated companies as Yanacocha depreciates and amortizes the acquired assets.

    The net increase in the participation in Yanacocha's net income during 2005 compared to 2004 is mainly due to increased sales of Yanacocha (price and volume), offset by a slight increase in the cash cost per ounce of gold sold. In addition, this participation is reduced as a consequence of the exchange rate used to convert into Nuevos Soles the participation in Yanacocha's results, reported in U.S. Dollars. The information related to Yanacocha's result is shown below:

    Year

    Sales

    Average
    quotation

    Quantity of

    ounces sold

    Cash cost

    per ounce sold

     

    US$(000)

    US$

    (In millions)

    US$

     

     

     

     

     

    2003

    1,036,370

    363

    2..86

    129

    2004

    1,249,882

    411

    3.04

    147

    2005

    1,490,402

    448

    3.33

    151

    (f) Mining concession -

    The movement of the amount paid over fair value of assets and liabilities of Yanacocha's shares at the acquisition dates is as follows:

     

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

    Balance at beginning of year

    113,850

    103,866

    Amortization

    (9,984)

    (9,621)

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Balance at year end

    103,866

    94,245

     

     

     

    (g) Summary of financial information based on the YanacochaYanacocha's financial statements -

    Presented below is certain summary financial information extracted from the YanacochaYanacocha's financial statements and adjusted to conform to accounting practices and principles of the Company, which are substantially similar to the principles used by Yanacocha in preparing its financial statements under U.S. GAAP:Company:

    A summarySummary of YanacochaYanacocha's balance sheetsheets data as of December 31, 20032004 and 2004 and2005 (includes 100 percent of Yanacocha's operations):

     

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

    Total assets

    3,961,413

    5,277,485

    Total liabilities

    1,298,902

    1,332,043

    Shareholders' equity

    2,662,511

    3,945,442

    Summary data from the Yanacocha statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 (includes 100 percent of Yanacocha's operations):

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

    Total revenues

    3,818,072

    4,279,074

    4,949,129

    Operating income

    1,751,810

    1,957,834

    2,526,633

    Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

    1,299,615

    1,336,238

    1,724,874

    Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

    (118,176)

    -

    -

    Net income

    1,181,439

    1,336,238

    1,724,874

    (h) Legal processes of Yanacocha

    Mercury spill in Choropampa -

    In June 2000, a transport contractor of the Company spilled approximately 11 liters of elemental mercury near the town of Choropampa, Peru, which is shown below. Justlocated 84.8 kilometers from Yanacocha. As a result of the accident, Yanacocha and other defendants were named in a lawsuit by over 1000 Peruvian citizens and the Provincial Municipality of Cajamarca in the Denver District Court of the State of Colorado, United States of America (hereinafter "the Court"). This action seeks compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the mercury spill incident. In February 2005, the Company answered the complaint presented at the Court.

    Likewise, additional lawsuits related to the Choropampa incident were filed against Yanacocha and other defendants in the local courts of Cajamarca by over 900 Peruvian citizens. Such lawsuits seek the payment of US$229,420,000 and S/.1,245,000 Peruvian Nuevos Soles. As of December 31, 2005, the Company has entered into settlement agreements with approximately 40% of the plaintiffs for amounts considerably lower than those initially claimed in their lawsuits, significantly reducing the contingency that these lawsuits created. In addition, more than half of the remaining plaintiffs in these Peruvian cases had previously entered into settlement agreements with the Company prior to filing their lawsuits. Yanacocha has filed motions to dismiss based on these previous settlements and has obtained positive judgments by the Civil Court of the Cajamarca Superior Court. The Plaintiffs have appealed many of these rulings to Peru's Supreme Court where they remain pending.

    Up to this date, Yanacocha considers that it is not possible to predict the final outcome of these demands; however, any effect related to them will not be significant for there financial statements.

    Tax processes -

    Tax authorities have reviewed the income tax and value added tax returns for years 1998 to 2001. As a result of these reviews, Yanacocha was notified with tax assessments of US$35.0 million, from which Yanacocha recorded an accrual of US$17.5 million in 2004. With the purpose of eliminating some of these contingencies, Yanacocha filed for the convenience"Sistema Especial de Actualización y Pago de Deudas Tributarias - SEAP" which allows the payment of incorrectly declared taxes, eliminating fines and accrued interest at preferential rates, resulting in a payment of US$11.5 million.

    In the opinion of Yanacocha's Management and its legal advisors, the accrual recorded is enough to cover the tax contingency.

    Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.

    (i) Economic activity -

    Cerro Verde is engaged in the extraction, production and commercialization of copper in its mining concessions located in the department of Arequipa, Peru. Currently, Cerro Verde is carrying out the construction of the reader,primary sulfide plant. The investment in this project is estimated in US$850 million and will allow its copper production increase from 90,000 MT to 300,000 MT.

    (j) Acquisition of additional shares -

    At the U.S. dollar amountsmeeting of Yanacocha (its functional currency) have been translated into Nuevos SolesCerro Verde held on April 18, 2005, the shareholders agreed to increase the capital stock by US$440 millions with the purpose of financing the construction of the primary sulfide plant, which total investment is estimated at US$850 million. This capital increase permitted Buenaventura to raise its share in Cerro Verde from 9.17% to 18.214%, by a payment of US$154.8 million. Subsequently, through of additional acquisitions of Cerro Verde's shares, Buenaventura has increased its total share to 18.299%.

    The share increase in Cerro Verde allows Buenaventura to exercise significant influence (ability to participate in the decisions related to financial and operational policies), which is evidenced by its representation in the Board of Directors; the participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions about dividends; participation as guarantor of Cerro Verde in the loan agreements entered by this entity with several foreign banks in connection with the financing of the construction of the primary sulfide plant; and unrestrictive access to the interim and annual financial information. As a consequence, Buenaventura has decided to account for its investment in Cerro Verde using an exchange ratethe equity method, since this investment no longer meets the criteria to be recorded at its fair value. Following, we describe the main accounting effects:

    - The fair value of the investment in Cerro Verde as of January 1, 2005 of S/3.283.256,043,000 was reversed with a charge to US$1.

    Balance Sheet

     

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Total assets

    3,762,453

    4,171,866

    Total liabilities

    1,461,496

    1,301,952

    Shareholders' Equity

    2,300,956

    2,663,084

    the account "Cumulative gain on investments at fair value" and a credit to the captions of investment by S/.250,087,000 and retained earnings by S/.5,956,000.

     

    Statements- The prior years effects, resulting from the application of the equity method since the date of the initial acquisition occurred in 1996, are S/.69,724,000. This amount is recorded by a charge to the investment caption and by a credit to the retained earnings caption of 2005. For the years 2003 and 2004, the change would have represented an increase in the share in affiliated companies in the consolidated statements of income from S/.557,558,000 to S/.571,734,000 in 2003 and from S/.575,858,000 to S/.603,453,000 in 2004, and an increase in the net income from S/.175,153,000 to S/.189,329,000 in 2003 and from S/.685,650,000 to S/.713,245,000 in 2004. In addition, the basic and diluted earnings per share would have increased from S/.1.38 to S/.1.49 in 2003 and from S/.5.39 to S/.5.61 in 2004.

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Total revenues

    2,342,086

    3,402,403

    4,103,363

    Operating income

    886,430

    1,561,093

    1,877,439

    Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

    649,778

    1,158,127

    1,281,368

    Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

    -

    (106,215)

    -

    Net income

    649,778

    1,051,913

    1,281,368

    - Buenaventura has recognized an amount of S/.197,754,000, as a result of comparing the acquisition costs with the share in the fair values of the assets and liabilities of Cerro Verde at the dates of the acquisition (1996 and 2005). This amount is included in the investment caption and amortized based on the proven and probable reserves of Cerro Verde.

    (k) Investment in Cerro Verde -

    The movement of the equity investment in Cerro Verde during 2005 is as follows:

    S/.(000)

    Cerro Verde's equity at beginning of year

    871,204

    Participation percentage

    9.17%

    __________

    Balance of investment at beginning of year

    79,889

    Acquisition of additional shares

    509,163

    Amount paid over fair value of assets and liabilities

    (197,754)

    Participation in Cerro Verde's income

    125,567

    Dividends received

    (43,892)

    Cumulative translation gain

    18,960

    __________

    Balance at year - end

    491,933

    __________

    (l) Mining concession -

    The amount paid over fair value of assets and liabilities of Cerro Verde's shares at the acquisition dates is as follows:

    2005

    S/.(000)

    Balance at beginning of year

    -

    Amount paid over fair value of assets and liabilities

    197,754

    __________

    Balance at year - end

    197,754

    __________

    (m) Summary of financial information based on the Cerro Verde's financial statements -

    Presented below is certain summary of financial information extracted from the Cerro Verde's financial statements and adjusted to conform to accounting practices and principles of the Company:

    Summary of Cerro Verde's balance sheets data as of December 31, 2005 (includes 100 percent of Cerro Verde's operations):

    S/.(000)

    Total assets

    2,911,715

    Total liabilities

    223,412

    Shareholders' equity

    2,688,303

    Summary data from the Cerro Verde statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2005 (includes 100 percent of Cerro Verde's operations).

    S/.(000)

    Total revenues

    1,183,027

    Operating income

    682,450

    Net income

    737,655

    (n) Dividends paid by Yanacocha -received-

    Cash dividends paid by YanacochaCerro Verde amounted to Condesa were S/83,070,000.4,871,000 and S/.43,892,000, during 2004 and 2005, respectively.

    (o) Guarantees granted -

    On September 30, 2005, Cerro Verde signed some agreements with several export credit agencies and commercial banks in 2002, S/482,025,000connection with the financing of US$450 million for the expansion of its operations. The financing requires the granting of mortgages and pledges over the Cerro Verde's assets. Also each of the main Cerro Verde's shareholders (Phelps Dodge, Sumitomo and Buenaventura) unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed to the export credit agencies and commercial banks, the punctual payment by Cerro Verde of the pro rata share of all loans obligations. The guarantees granted have to be maintained until the final maturity of the long - term debt received by Cerro Verde (September 2014) or by complete payment by the shareholders of their pro rata share of the guaranteed obligation. Until the earlier of (i) September 2014, the final maturity of the long-term debt, (ii) or the payment of the full obligations by each shareholder, Buenaventura shall maintain a net worth at least equal to US$300,000,00 0.

    A guarantee acceleration event will occur if Buenaventura commences a proceeding under any applicable bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, readjustment of debt, relief of debtors, dissolution, insolvency, liquidation or similar law or fail to maintain a net worth at least equal to US$300,000,000. Additionally, shares in 2003 and S/414,911,000Cerro Verde owned by Buenaventura are pledged in 2004.favor of such banks. No guarantee acceleration event has occurred with respect to Buenaventura as of December 31, 2005.

    Legal proceedings -

    See note 37(c).

  • 13. Property, plant and equipment, net
    1. (a) The 20042005 movement withinwith the cost and accumulated depreciation accounts is shownshow below:

     

    Beginning balance

    Additions

    Retirements

    Sales

    Transfers

    Ending balance

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Cost

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Land

    6,237

    413

    -

    -

    259

    6,909

    Mineral rights

    22,741

    722

    -

    -

    -

    23,463

    Buildings, constructions and other

    387,970

    2,960

    (14)

    (888)

    5,886

    395,914

    Machinery and equipment

    546,155

    24,626

    (886)

    (13,622)

    28,836

    585,109

    Transportation units

    29,812

    356

    (82)

    (2,115)

    1,802

    29,773

    Furniture and fixtures

    16,655

    210

    (4)

    (287)

    376

    16,950

    Work in progress (d)

    26,033

    67,220

    -

    -

    (37,159)

    56,094

    Mine closure costs, notes 3
    and 19 (c)

    6,954

    10,688

    -

    -

    -

    17,642

     

    1,042,557

    107,195

    (986)

    (16,912)

    -

    1,131,854

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Accumulated depreciation and amortization

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Mineral rights

    8,776

    2,045

    -

    -

    -

    10,821

    Buildings, constructions and other

    192,127

    15,764

    -

    (382)

    -

    207,509

    Machinery and equipment

    399,913

    34,244

    (164)

    (12,974)

    -

    421,019

    Transportation units

    20,469

    2,392

    (68)

    (1,831)

    -

    20,962

    Furniture and fixtures

    9,406

    883

    -

    (287)

    -

    10,002

    Mine closure costs, notes 3
    and 19 (c)

    3,734

    5,593

    -

    -

    -

    9,327

     

    634,425

    60,921

    (232)

    (15,474)

    -

    679,640

    Net cost

    408,132

     

     

     

     

    452,214

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Beginning

    Balance

    Additions

    Retirements

    Sales

    Transfers

    Ending

    Balance

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    Cost

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Land

    6,909

    79

    -

    -

    749

    7,737

    Mining lands

    23,463

    1,675

    -

    -

    -

    25,138

    Mining concessions (d)

    228,874

    14,897

    -

    -

    -

    243,771

    Building, constructions and other

    395,914

    121

    (9,749)

    -

    48,203

    434,489

    Machinery and equipment

    585,109

    34,663

    (79,725)

    (4,631)

    7,118

    542,534

    Transportation units

    29,773

    263

    (9,091)

    (993)

    1,534

    21,486

    Furniture and mixtures

    16,950

    22

    (5,088)

    -

    2,617

    14,501

    Work in progress

    56,094

    18,533

    -

    -

    (60,221)

    14,406

    Mine closure costs, notes 3 and 17(c)

    17,642

    27,967

    -

    -

    -

    45,609

     

    1,360,728

    98,220

    (103,653)

    (5,624)

    -

    1,349,671

    Accumulated depreciation and amortization

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Mining lands

    10,821

    2,112

    -

    -

    -

    12,933

    Mining concessions (d)

    77,529

    16,330

    -

    -

    -

    93,859

    Building, constructions and other

    207,509

    23,848

    (8,616)

    -

    -

    222,741

    Machinery and equipment

    421,019

    41,131

    (78,460)

    (4,629)

    -

    379,061

    Transportation units

    20,962

    1,646

    (8,037)

    (858)

    -

    13,713

    Furniture and mixtures

    10,002

    894

    (4,942)

    -

    -

    5,954

    Mine closure costs, note 3

    9,327

    28,802

    -

    -

    -

    38,129

     

    757,169

    114,763

    (100,055)

    (5,487)

    -

    766,390

    Net cost

    603,559

     

     

     

     

    583,281

  • (b) Fully depreciated assets as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 amount to S/336,849,000.405,937,000 and S/405,937,000,.360,187,000, respectively.
  • Currently, these assets are being used by the Company.

  • (c) The distribution of annual depreciation and amortization was as follow:

  • 2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Inventories

    1,884

    817

    44

    817

    44

    2,298

    Operating costs

    43,195

    49,118

    59,473

    63,786

    74,077

    111,177

    Exploration costs in non-operative mining
    areas

    2,229

    479

    -

    Other, net, note 31

    -

    2,643

    1,404

    Exploration cost in non-operative mining areas

    479

    -

    571

    Others

    2,643

    1,404

    717

    47,308

    53,057

    60,921

     

    67,725

    75,525

    114,763

     

  • Work in progress mainly corresponds to the construction(d) The 2005 movement of Tailing Dam No 4. in the Orcopampacost and accumulated amortization of mining unit.
  • concessions are shown below:

  • El Brocal has pledged property, plant and equipment for approximately US$5,822,000, as a guarantee of the long-term debt with Banco de Crédito del Perú and BBVA Banco Continental, see note 20.
  •  

    Balance as of January 1, 2005

    Additions

    Balance as of December 31, 2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

    Cost

     

     

     

    Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C.- CEDIMIN

    175,456

    -

    175,456

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    42,476

    -

    42,476

    Minas Poracota S.A.

    -

    8,763

    8,763

    Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

    5,549

    6,134

    11,683

    Minera Paula 49 S.A.C.

    5,393

    -

    5,393

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

    228,874

    14,897

    243,771

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

    Accumulated amortization

     

     

     

    Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

    54,117

    10,897

    65,014

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    21,364

    2,967

    24,331

    Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

    2,048

    493

    2,541

    Minera Paula 49 S.A.C.

    -

    1,973

    1,973

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

    77,529

    16,330

    93,859

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

     

     

     

    Net cost

    151,345

     

    149,912

     

    _________

     

    _________

  • Mine development

    14. Development costs, net

    1. Movements

      (a) The movement of the cost and accumulated amortization by mining unit is as follow:

    2. Balance as of January 1, 2005

      Additions

      Balance as of December 31, 2005

      Balance as of January 1st, 2004

      Additions

      Balance as of December 31, 2004

      S/.(000)

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

       

      Cost

       

       

       

       

      Uchucchacua

      91,528

      3,293

      94,821

      94,821

      2,667

      97,488

      Orcopampa

      28,831

      31,850

      60,681

      60,681

      38,940

      99,621

      Antapite

      56,812

      3,468

      60,280

      60,280

      1,910

      62,190

      Ishihuinca

      16,624

      -

      16,624

      16,624

      751

      17,375

      Mine closing costs, notes 3
      and 19 (c)

      7,784

      14,154

      21,938

      Poracota

      -

      12,263

      Veta Nazareno

      -

      1,055

      Mine closing costs, note 3

      21,938

      -

      21,938

      201,579

      52,765

      254,344

      _________

      Accumulated amortization of:

       

       

       

       

      254,344

      57,586

      311,930

      ________

      Accumulated amortization

       

      Uchucchacua

      37,095

      8,599

      45,694

      45,694

      8,741

      54,435

      Orcopampa

      10,297

      8,261

      18,558

      18,558

      13,056

      31,614

      Antapite

      12,390

      5,108

      17,498

      17,498

      12,656

      30,154

      Ishihuinca

      14,956

      513

      15,469

      15,469

      900

      16,369

      Mine closure costs, notes 3 and 19 (c)

      3,020

      10,847

      13,867

      Mine closing costs, note 3

      13,867

      1,567

      15,434

      ________

      111,086

      36,920

      148,006

      ________

      77,758

      33,328

      111,086

       

      Net cost

      123,821

       

      143,258

      143,258

       

      163,924

      ________

       

      ________

    3. (b) The annual amortization was distributed as follows:

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Exploration and development costs in operational mining sites, note 26

    14,985

    15,806

    30,854

    Exploration costs in non-operational mining areas

    -

    -

    2,145

    Operating costs

    -

    639

    266

    Inventories

    994

    238

    63

     

    15,979

    16,683

    33,328

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

    Exploration and development costs in

    operational mining sites, note 24

    16,445

    31,120

    34,090

    Exploration cost in-non operational mining areas

    -

    2,145

    -

    Inventories

    238

    63

    2,830

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

     

     

     

     

    16,683

    33,328

    36,920

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

  • Deferred stripping costs
  • The movements of deferred stripping costs during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 were as follows:

     

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Beginning balance

    41,727

    56,056

    Additions

    14,329

    -

    Ending balance

    56,056

    56,056

  • Mining concessions and goodwill, net
    1. Movements of cost and accumulated amortization accounts were as follows:
    2.  

      Balance as of January 1, 2004

      Additions

      Retirements

      Balance as of December 31, 2004

       

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

      Cost

       

       

       

       

      Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C.- CEDIMIN

      175,837

      -

      (381 )

      175,456

      Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

      42,476

      -

      -

      42,476

      Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

       

      9,113

      -

      -

      9,113

      Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

      5,549

      -

      -

      5,549

      Minera Paula 49 S.A.C.

      -

      5,393

      -

      5,393

       

      232,975

      5,393

      (381 )

      237,987

      Accumulated amortization

       

       

       

       

      Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

      43,261

      10,859

      -

      54,120

      Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

      18,149

      3,212

      -

      21,361

      Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

      1,920

      994

      -

      2,914

      Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

      1,515

      533

      -

      2,048

       

      64,845

      15,598

       

      80,443

      Net cost

      168,130

       

       

      157,544

    3. Management estimates that the amortization expense for each of the next five years will be approximately S/15 million.
  • 15. Bank loans
  • Bank loans, mainly contracted in U.S. dollars consist of:

    Annual interest rate

    2003

    2004

    2004

    2005

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/.(000)

    Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

     

     

     

    Banco Interamericano de Finanzas-BIF

    4.45% (3.72% as of December 31, 2003)

    1,635

    3,283

    Banco de Crédito del Perú

    Between 3.69% and 3.81%

    5,959

    -

    Banco Internacional del Perú-Interbank

    Between 3.71% and 4.48%

    4,905

    -

     

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú

    2.66 %

    10,539

    9,521

    9,521

    3,431

    Banco Wiese Sudameris

    -

    22,302

     

    Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

     

    Banco Interamericano de Finanzas - BIF

    3,283

    -

     

    Other subsidiaries

     

    423

    346

    346

    496

     

    23,461

    13,150

    _________

     

    13,150

    26,229

    _________

    As of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, this caption is mainly conformed by pre and post-export loans obtained from various domestic banks. The loans obtained by El Brocal are guaranteed by the related shipments of concentrate inventories, and have current maturities. The loan obtained by Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A. does not have specific guarantees.

    The weighted average annual interest rates on bank loans were 4.243.12 percent and 3.37 percent during 2003 and 2004, respectively. The weighted average annual interest rate was 9.334.85 percent at December 31, 20032004 and 3.12 percent at December 31, 2004.2005, respectively.

  • 16. Trade accounts payable

  • This item is made up as follows:

     

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Local suppliers

    49,957

    49,767

    Foreign suppliers

    2,742

    11,421

     

    52,699

    61,188

    Trade accounts payable are mainly originated by the acquisition of materials, supplies and supplies.spare parts. These obligations are stated in local and foreign currency, have current maturities and do not accrue interest. No guarantees have been granted.

  • 17. Other current liabilities

    1. (a) This item is made up as follows:

    2. follow:

    2004

    2005

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Accrual for mine closing costs (c)

    51,202

    67,521

    67,521

    92,371

    Stock appreciation rights (b)

    57,463

    47,047

    47,047

    59,324

    Income tax payable

    -

    25,143

    25,143

    37,299

    Other taxes payable

    28,500

    20,072

    20,072

    20,538

    Accounts payable to a joint venture partner

    9,435

    18,218

    Remuneration and similar benefits payable

    3,865

    7,202

    7,202

    17,100

    Accounts payable to a joint venture partner

    -

    9,435

    Workers' profit sharing payable

    5,507

    11,738

    11,738

    14,657

    Derivative instruments payable

    -

    8,100

    Accrual for labor contingencies

    3,140

    4,744

    Royalties payable to the Peruvian Government

    -

    6,639

    6,639

    3,825

    Accrual for labor contingencies

    -

    3,140

    Royalties payable to third parties, note 37(b)

    4,620

    2,513

    Accrual for exchange difference loss related to a forward contract, note 35 (b)

    773

    2,182

    Royalties payable to third parties, note 36(b)

    2,513

    2,874

    Dividends payable

    1,838

    1,467

    1,467

    2,274

    Other liabilities, each individually less than S/1,500,000

    9,210

    12,627

    Other liabilities, each individually less than S/.1,500,000

    14,809

    20,125

    _________

    _________

    216,726

    301,449

    162,978

    216,726

    _________

    _________

    Long - term portion

     

     

     

     

    Accrual for mine closing costs

    (39,881)

    (44,377)

    Stock appreciation rights

    (48,151)

    (32,444)

    (32,444)

    (34,257)

    Accrual for mine closing

    (28,702)

    (39,881)

    Accounts payable to a joint venture partner

    (9,435)

    (18,218)

    Others

    -

    (1,705)

    (1,705)

    -

    (76,853)

    (74,030)

    _________

    _________

    (83,465)

    (96,852)

    _________

    _________

     

     

    Current portion

    86,125

    142,696

    133,261

    204,597

    _________

  • (b) Stock Appreciation Rights -
  • The Company has a program under which certain executives earn a cash bonus equal to that executive's allotted number of shares multiplied by the difference between the market value at a future date of the Company's shares and the base price on the executive's share. This program remains in effect as long as the executive works for the Company at each program's settlement date.

    The measurement is made at the end of each reporting period based on the current market price of the shares. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period established in each program. The maximum terms of options granted is 9 years.

    The number of shares units which will be granted to executives subject to the stock appreciation rights bonus in future years, are as follows:

    Years

    Number of shares

    Number

    of shares

    2004

    94,900

    2005

    150,300

     

    2006

    192,700

    383,400

    2007

    217,100

    400,200

    2008

    190,900

    396,800

    2009

    193,000

    343,500

    2010

    282,700

    Thereafter

    388,600

    558,000

    1,427,500

    _________

     

    2,364,600

    _________

    In 2004,2005, the Company recorded an expense amounting to S/2,135,000.26,883,000 in connection with this program (S/6,744,000.49,594,000 and S/49,594,000.2,135,000 in 20022003 and 2003,2004, respectively), which is recorded in the "general and administrative" caption in the consolidated statements of income.

  • (c) Accrual for mine closing costs -

  • Movements within the accrual for mine closing costs follow:

     

    S/.(000)

    Balance as of January 1, 20032004

    7,45351,202

    Disbursements

    (3,637)

    Cumulative effect of accounting change

    40,679

    Accretion expense, note 31

    4,724

    Loss from exposure to inflation

    1,983

    Balance as of December 31, 2003

    51,202

    Disbursements

    (5,691)

    RevisionAdditions and changes in estimated cash flowsestimates

    21,019

    Accretion expense, note 3130

    7,056

    Gain from exposure to inflation

    (6,065)

    _________

    Balance as of December 31, 2004

    67,521

    Disbursements

    (10,738)

    Additions and changes in estimates, note 13

    27,967

    Accretion expense, note 30

    7,621

    _________

    Balance as of December 31, 2005

    92,371

    _________

    On December 31, 2004, the Company revised its estimate to reflect anThe increase in marketplace rates as well as additional activities included inthe accrual of 2005 is explained mainly by the new estimation of the closing costs for the Colquirrumi mining unit, which has not being operating for more than 15 years.

    The accrual for mine closing costs is based on studies completed by independent parties, in accordance with current environmental protection regulations, see note 37 (a)36(a).

  • Royalties payable The accrual for mine closing costs corresponds mainly to Peruvian Government -
  • On June 24, 2004, the Peruvian Congress approved Law 28258 - Mining Royalties Law. This law established a mining royaltyactivities that owners of mining concessions should payhave to be completed for the restoration of the mining units and affected areas as a consequence of the exploitation activities. The main works that have to be completed are the land movements, reforestation labor and remove of metallic and non-metallic resources. Thethe mining royalties will be calculated with rates ranging from 1% to 3% over the mineral concentrates value or equivalent, according to the quoted market price published by the Ministry of Energy and Mines. The corresponding ruling was approved on November 15, 2004, and is effective June 26, 2004.plants.

    Royalties amounted to S/6,639,000 in 2004 and would be paid in a five-months period, beginning on February 28, 2005.

  • 18. Long-term debt

    1. (a) Long-term debt, denominated in U.S. dollars, werewas as follows:

     

    Guarantee

    Annual interest rate

    Final maturity

    2003

    2004

     

     

     

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

     

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú

    Guaranteed by Buenaventura

    4.5%

    September 2005

    72,675

    22,981

    Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

     

     

     

     

     

    BBVA Banco Continental

    Guaranteed by Buenaventura

    Three - month Libor plus 1.2% (3.76% as of December 31, 2004)

    April 2005

    19,319

    4,323

    Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A. (c)

     

     

     

     

     

    BBVA Banco Continental

    Pledge over machinery and equipment for US$1,000,000; and cash flows from collections of a client.

    Three - month Libor plus 2.35% (4.91% as of December 31, 2004)

    November 2009

    -

    12,147

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú

    Pledge over machinery and equipment for US$5,822,000; and cash flows from collections of two clients

    Three - month Libor plus 3.75% (6.31% as of December 31, 2004)

    September 2006

    18,320

    10,533

    Teck Cominco Metals Ltd.

    No specific guarantees

    Three - month Libor plus 6% (7.16% as of December 31, 2003)

    December 2006

    5,494

    -

    Banco de Crédito Leasing

    Leased property

    5.00%

    June 2007

    -

    1,037

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Other

     

     

     

    113

    342

     

     

     

     

    115,921

    51,363

    Current Portion

     

     

     

    (70,453)

    (36,332 )

    Long-term portion

     

     

     

    45,468

    15,031

     

    Guarantee

    Annual interest rate

    Final maturity

    2004

    2005

     

     

     

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

     

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú (capital lease)

    Leased property

    5.34%

    June 2008

    -

    1,181

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú (capital lease)

    Leased property

    6.36%

    June 2007

    -

    808

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú (capital lease)

    Leased property

    5.00%

    June 2007

    1,044

    676

     

     

     

     

     

     

    BBVA Banco Continental

    Pledge over machinery and equipment for US$1,000,000; and cash flow from collection of a client

    Three month Libor plus 2.35%

    November 2009 (Pre-paid in December 2005)

    12,147

    -

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú

    Pledge over machinery and equipment for US$5,822,000; and cash flow from collections
    of two clients

    Three month Libor plus 3.75%

    September 2006 (Pre-paid in December 2005)

    10,532

    -

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

     

     

     

     

     

    Banco de Crédito del Perú

    Guaranteed by Buenaventura

    4.50%

    September 2005

    22,981

    -

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

     

     

     

     

     

    BBVA Banco Continental

    Guaranteed by Buenaventura

    Three month Libor plus 1.2%
    (3.76% as of December 31, 2004)

    April 2005

    4,323

    -

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Others

     

     

     

    336

    333

     

     

     

     

    ________

    ________

     

     

     

     

    51,363

    2,998

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Current portion

     

     

     

    (36,332)

    (1,631)

     

     

     

     

    ________

    ________

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Long-term portion

     

     

     

    15,031

    1,367

     

     

     

     

    ________

    ________

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • (b) The long-term debt maturity schedule as of December 31, 20042005 is as follows:
  • Year ended December 31,

    Amount

    Amount

    S/(000)

    S/.(000)

    2006

    7,524

     

    2007

    2,651

    1,084

    2008

    2,428

    283

    2009

    2,428

    15,031

    _________

     

    1,367

    _________

  • The financing agreements of El Brocal include certain provisions that require compliance with certain financial indicators. Except for the maximum leverage ratio required by BBVA Banco Continental, El Brocal has complied with those indicators as of December 31, 2003 and 2004. This non-fulfillment will be informed to BBVA and, in management's opinion, it will have no effect on the current conditions of the borrowing, considering that the leverage ratio must not exceed 1.0 and the actual leverage ratio is 1.04 as of December 31, 2004. In addition, this ratio considers S/13 million of a deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing liability, which does not require an immediate cash outflow.
  • The debt that Brocal maintained with Teck Cominco Limited was paid with funds arising from the long term debt obtained from BBVA Banco Continental.
  • (c) The weighted average annual interest rates of the long-termlong - term debt were 4.814.92 percent and 4.925.56 percent during 20032004 and 2004,2005, respectively.
  • 19. Minority interest

    The 2004 and 2005 movement of minority interest liability shown in the consolidated balance sheets consists of:

     

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    27,762

    50,337

    S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

    14,227

    15,655

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

    8,722

    14,165

    Minera La Zanja S.R.L.

    -

    (13,111 )

    Other

    (2,283 )

    (699 )

     

    48,428

    66,347

    Minority interest income (expense) is presented in the consolidated statements of income and consists of:as follows:

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Minera La Zanja S.R.L.

    -

    -

    19,723

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    (1,884)

    (10,439 )

    (7,906)

    S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

    (23,121 )

    (33,175 )

    (34,951 )

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

    (1,719 )

    (7,905 )

    (5,444 )

    Other

    1,263

    496

    407

     

    (25,461 )

    (51,023 )

    (28,171 )

    2004

    2005

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    Beginning balance

    48,428

    66,347

    Minority share in the results

    28,171

    66,003

    Contributions from minority shareholders

    -

    2,566

    Cumulative unrealized loss on derivative instruments

    13,778

    1,193

    Cumulative effect at change in accounting principle in El Brocal (stripping costs)

    -

    (25,684)

    Dividends paid to minority shareholders of S.M.R.L Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

    (33,521)

    (36,840)

    Reduction of capital stock

    3,877

    -

    Others

    5,614

    6,662

     

    _________

    _________

    Ending balance

    66,347

    80,247

     

    _________

    _________

  • 20. Shareholders' equity
    1. (a) Capital stock -

    2. The holders of Company'sCompany has common shares are entitled to exercise voting rights that represent the 100 percent of its outstanding share capital.

      The Mandatory Annual Shareholders' meeting held on March 26, 2002, decided to increase the Company's capital stock from S/137,444,962 to S/549,779,848 (from S/197,894,000 to S/646,414,000, in constant values as of December 31, 2004) through the capitalization of a portion of retained earnings as of December 31, 2001, and by increasing the nominal value of the common shares - Series A and B from S/1 to S/4. From the capitalized amount of S/412,334,886 (approximately S/448,520,000 in constant values as of December 31, 2004), S/129,266,262 corresponds to common shares - Series A and S/283,068,624 to common shares - Series B.

      The Shareholders' Meeting held on April 30, 2002 approved the re-designation of common shares - Series B as common shares - Series A, and then immediately approved the re-designation of common shares - Series A as common shares. As a consequence, since May 3, 2002, the Company's capital stock is comprised of 137,444,962 common shares with a nominal value of S/4 each.

      In October 28, 2003, the Board of Directors decided to modify the ADR's program with the Bank of New York. Effective November 12, 2003, each ADR corresponds to one common share; formerly, each ADR corresponded to two common shares.

      As explained in note 2(t)2(s), the nominal value restated by inflation of the treasury shares adjusted by inflation is presented net offrom the capital stock. The detail of the capital stock as of December 31, 20042005 is as follows:

    Number

    of shares

    Nominal
    value

    Result from exposure to inflation

    Capital
    stock

    Number of shares

    Nominal
    value

    Result from exposure to inflation

    Capital
    stock

     

    S/.(000)

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Common shares

    137,444,962

    549,780

    96,634

    646,414

    137,444,962

    549,780

    96,634

    646,414

    Treasury shares

    (10,565,130)

    (42,261 )

    (7,398 )

    (49,659 )

    (10,565,130)

    (42,261)

    (7,398)

    (49,659)

    126,879,832

    507,519

    89,236

    596,755

    ___________

    ________

    _________

    _______

    126,879,832

    507,519

    89,236

    596,755

    ___________

    ________

    _________

    _______

    As a result of the restatement of the 2004 financial statements for inflation at December 31, 2004, the Company is permitted to issue additional common shares for a total value of S/96,634,000..96,634,000.

  • The capital stock structure as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 is shown below:

  • Percentage

    Number of shares

    Whole participation

     

    _________________________

    _________________________

     

    2004

    2005

    2004

    2005

     

     

     

     

     

    Less than 0.20%

    1,581

    1,395

    8.63

    9.67

    From 0.20% to 1.00%

    20

    19

    12.68

    10.66

    From 1.01% to 5.00%

    21

    23

    42.27

    46.25

    From 5.01% to 10.00%

    3

    3

    22.40

    19.40

    From 10.01% to 100.00%

    1

    1

    14.02

    14.02

     

     

     

     

     

    The market value of the common shares is S/.97.10, equivalent to US$28.30 as of December 31, 2005 (S/.75.18, equivalent to US$22.90 as of December 31, 2004), and presents a negotiation rate of 100 percent.

    (b) Investment shares -

    The investment shares are not entitled to exercise voting rights and do not represent the Company's stock obligation. However, investment shares confer upon the holders thereof the right to participate in the dividends distributed.

    The Annual Shareholders' meeting mentioned in paragraph (a) above, also decided to increase the investment shares account from S/372,320 to S/1,489,280 (from S/533,000 to S/1,749,000, in constant values of December 31, 2004), by increasing the nominal value of investment shares from S/1 to S/4, concurrent with the capitalization of a portion of retained earnings equal to S/1,116,960 (S/1,216,000 in constant value as of December 31, 2004). As a consequence, effective May 3, 2002, there are 372,320 investment shares with a nominal value of S/4 each.

    As explained in note 2(t)2(s), the nominal value restated by inflation of the investment shares held in treasury adjusted by inflation is presented net offrom the investment shares. The detail of the investment shares as of December 31, 20042005 follows:

    Number of shares

    Nominal value

    Result from exposure to inflation

    Investment shares

    Number of shares

    Nominal
    value

    Result from exposure to inflation

    Investment shares

     

    S/.(000)

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Investment shares

    372,320

    1,489

    260

    1,749

    372,320

    1,489

    260

    1,749

    Investment shares held in treasury

    (15,933 )

    (63 )

    (3)

    (66 )

    (30,988)

    (124)

    (3)

    (127)

    356,387

    1,426

    257

    1,683

    __________

    _________

    341,332

    1,365

    257

    1,622

    __________

    _________

    As a result of the restatement of the 2004 financial statements for inflation at December 31, 2004, the Company is permitted to issue additional investment shares for a total value of S/260,000..260,000.

  • (c) Additional capital -

  • The additional capital of the Company includes the following as of December 31, 2004:2005:

    - The premium received on the issuance of Series B common shares for S/546,835,000..546,835,000.

    - The income fromproceedsfrom the sale of ADR for S/30,286,000,.30,286,000, and

    - The difference between constant nominal values of treasury shares (common and investment), held by the subsidiary Condesa, and the cost of such shares for S/33,538,000..32,613,000.

  • (d) Legal reserve -

    According to theLey General de Sociedades (General(General Corporations Law), applicable to individual and unconsolidated financial statements, a minimum of 10 percent of distributable income in each year, after deducting income tax, shall be transferred to a legal reserve, until such reserve is equal to 20 percent of capital stock. This legal reserve may be used to offset losses or may be capitalized; however, if used to offset losses or if capitalized, the reserve must be replenished with future profits.

  • (e) Treasury shares maintained by subsidiary -

  • As explained in note 2(t)2(s), the values of treasury shares are presented net of the capital stock and investment shares, and as an increase to the additional capital accounts.account.

    In the first quarter of 2002, Condesa sold to third parties an additional 322,000 ADR (equivalent to 644,000 common shares) for approximately S/25,192,000, which is presented in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders' equity.

  • (f) Declared and paid dividends -

  • The information about declared and paid dividends in the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 is as follows:

    Meeting Board

    Date

    Declared
    dividends

    Dividends
    per share

    Meeting/Board

    Date

    Declared

    dividends

    Dividends

    per share

     

    S/

     

    S/.

    Dividends 2002

     

     

    Mandatory Annual Shareholders' meeting

    March 26, 2002

    31,637,000

    0.23

     

    Dividends 2003

     

    Mandatory annual shareholders' meeting

    March 31

    44,198,000

    0.32

    Board of Directors

    October 22, 2002

    46,891,000

    0.34

    July 31

    80,280,000

    0.58

    Board of Directors

    October 22, 2002

    3,028,000

    (*)

    October 28

    47,771,000

    0.35

     

    81,556,000

     

     

    __________

     

    Dividends 2003

     

     

    Mandatory Annual Shareholders' meeting

    March 31, 2003

    44,198,000

    0.32

    Board of Directors

    July 31, 2003

    80,280,000

    0.58

     

    172,249,000

     

    Less - Dividends paid to subsidiary Condesa

     

    (13,085,000)

     

     

    __________

     

     

    159,164,000

     

     

    _________

     

     

    Dividends 2004

     

    Mandatory annual shareholders' meeting

    March 26

    77,823,000

    0.56

    Board of Directors

    October 28, 2003

    47,771,000

    0.35

    October 28

    73,208,000

    0.53

     

    172,249,000

     

     

    __________

     

    Dividends 2004

     

     

    Mandatory Annual Shareholders' meeting

    March 26, 2004

    77,823,000

    0.56

     

    151,031,000

     

    Less - Dividends paid to subsidiary Condesa

     

    (11,567,000)

     

     

    __________

     

     

    139,464,000

     

     

    _________

     

     

    Dividends 2005

     

    Mandatory annual shareholders' meeting

    March 31

    80,623,000

    0.58

    Board of Directors

    October 28, 2004

    73,208,000

    0.53

    October 26

    84,096,000

    0.61

     

    151,031,000

     

     

    __________

     

     

    164,719,000

     

    Less - Dividends paid to subsidiary Condesa

     

    (12,713,000)

     

     

    __________

     

     

    152,006,000

     

     

    _________

     

    (*) Equivalent to S/2.19 per common share of El Brocal.

    During 2002, 2003 and 2004, the dividends paid to the subsidiary Condesa for Buenaventura's shares amount to S/6,264,000, S/13,085,000 and S/11,567,000, respectively. These amounts reduce the amounts of declared and paid dividends in the consolidated statements of shareholders' equity.

  • (g) Cumulative translation gain (loss) -
  • This amount corresponds to the exchange differences that arise as a result of applying the methodology described in Note 2(f) when translating the financial statements of Yanacocha and Cerro Verde from U.S. dollars to Peruvian Nuevos Soles. These exchange differences will be presented in equity until the related investment is disposed of.

  • 21. Taxation

    1. (a) Buenaventura and their subsidiaries are subject to Peruvian tax law. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the statutory income tax rate in Peru is 30 percent (27 percent until December 31, 2003), including the gain (loss) from exposure to inflation.

    2. percent.

      Non -Companies not domiciled companies in Peru and individuals must pay an additional tax of 4.1 percent over received dividends.

      Effective January 1, 2005, the following tax modifications are in force:

      - It has been established a Temporary Tax on Net Assets, which will be in force until December 31, 2006. This tax can be used as credit against the income tax prepayments.

      - For income tax purposes, especially for calculating the income tax, the financial statements shall not be adjusted for inflation.

    3. (b) The tax authorities are legally entitled to review and, if necessary, adjust the income tax calculated by the Company during the four years subsequent to the year of the related tax return filing. The income tax and value added tax returns of the following years are pending review by the tax authorities:

    Entity

    Entity

    Years open to review by tax authorities

    Buenaventura

    2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones
    Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

    2000, 2001, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    Compañía Minera Condesa S.A.

    2002, 2003, 2004 y and 20042005

    Compañía Minera Colquirrumi S.A.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    Contacto Corredores de Seguros S.A.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

    2000, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004

    Metalúrgica Los Volcanes S.A.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004

    Minera Paula 49 S.A.C.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20042005

    Minas Conga S.R.L.

    2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005

    S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

    2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005

    Minera La Zanja S.R.L.

    2004 and 2005

    Minas Poracota S.A.

    2005

    Minera Minasnioc S.A.C.

    2004 and 2005

    The income tax of Buenaventura for 2000 was reviewed by the Tax Administration. As a consequence, Buenaventura received an assessment that modifiesreduced the tax loss carryforward.carryforward in S/.114,001,000. The main issue is that the Company considered certain revenues (dividends and equity participation) as taxable for determining the tax loss carryforward. In opinion of the Company's legal advisors, the assessment does not have solid grounds. It is expected that the Company obtainswill obtain a favorable opinion in the administrative process initiated against the assessment.

    The 2002 income tax of Cedimin was reviewed by the Tax Administration. As a consequence, Cedimin received an assessment that modified the tax loss carryforward. The main issue is that Cedimin considered the loss from the sale of its shares in Minera Huallanca S.A.C. and Minera Yanaquihua S.A by S/.27,129,000 as deductible. In opinion of Cedimin's legal advisors, such assessment has no solid grounds and therefore, it is expected that Cedimin will obtain a favorable opinion in the administrative process initiated against the assessment.

    Additionally, the 2000 and 2001 income tax of Condesa was reviewed by the Tax Administration. As a consequence, the Company received tax assessments that reduced the tax loss carrryforward by S/.1,360,000 in 2000 and by S/.16,987,000 in 2001. In both periods, the main issue was that Condesa considered certain revenues - dividends and equity participation - as taxable for determining the tax loss carryforward. In opinion of Condesa's legal advisors, such assessment has no solid grounds and therefore, it is expected that Condesa will obtain a favorable opinion in the administrative process initiated against the assessment.

    Due to various possible interpretations of current legislation, it is not possible to determine whether or not future reviews will result in tax liabilities for the Company. In the event that additional taxes payable, interest and surcharges result from tax authority reviews, they will be charged to expense in the period assessed and payment is deemed probable.paid. However, in theManagement's and legal advisory opinion, of Management, there are no issues that may result in significant tax contingencies for the Company and any additional tax assessment would not be significant to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004.2004 and 2005.

  • (c) With the purpose of determining the income tax and the value added tax, the transfer priceprices among related parties and for transactions with companies domiciled in countries considered tax havens, prices should be supported by documentation containing information about the valuation methods applied and criteria used in its determination. Based on an analysis of the Company's operations, Management and its legal advisors do not believe that the new regulations will not result in significant contingencies for the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. Effective January, 20042005.

    (d) The Company has the benefit to recover the value added tax of the sales export. Therefore, the tax paid in purchases of goods can be applied to the tax from their sales or other tax obligations, or the Company is obliged to file an annual informative declaration of these transactions.

  • can request a refund. During the year 2000, Yanacocha was notified with tax assessments2005, Buenaventura has requested the refund of US$24.4 million in connection with the income tax and valuevalued added tax - VAT for years 1998 and 1999, as well as for VATS/.39,570,000. On December 31, 2005, the amount pending at refund from the tax authority of January and February 2000. WithS/.8,310,000 is included in the purpose of eliminating some of these contingencies, Yanacocha filed for the "Sistema Especial de Actualización y Pago de Deudas Tributarias - SEAP" which allows the payment of incorrectly declared taxes, eliminating fines and accrued interest at preferential rates. Although Yanacocha filed for the SEAP, it still has a lawsuit outstanding before the Supreme Court of Justice for US$3.1 million.
  • caption "other accounts receivable".

    In the opinion of Yanacocha's Management and its legal advisors, there are no issues that may result in significant tax contingencies.

  • 22. Net sales by geographic region sales agreements

    The Company's revenues primarily result from the sale of precious metal concentrates, including silver-lead, silver-gold, zinc and lead-gold-copper concentrates and ounces of gold. The following table shows net sales by geographic region:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Peru

    327,768

    383,180

    437,411

    383,180

    437,411

    435,701

    Europe

    289,597

    424,614

    218,053

    North America

    38,202

    28,793

    50,736

    28,793

    50,736

    160,011

    Europe

    175,916

    289,597

    424,614

    Asia

    20,976

    26,065

    15,838

    26,065

    15,838

    44,307

    Oceania

    5,260

    2,266

    -

    2,266

    -

    77,969

    568,122

    729,901

    928,599

    Income (expense) from hedging transactions, note 35(a)

    7,585

    5,405

    (20,158 )

    South America

    -

    554

    575,707

    735,306

    908,441

    _________

     

    729,901

    928,599

    936,595

     

    Income (expense) from hedging transactions

    of subsidiary

    5,405

    (20,158)

    -

    _________

     

    735,306

    908,441

    936,595

    _________

    In 2004,2005, the Company's three largest customers accounted for 20%18%, 16%17% and 13%, respectively, of total sales (35%(20%, 28%16% and 11%13% of total sales in 2003)2004). As of December 31, 2004, 48%2005, 61% of the trade accounts receivable is related to these customers (77%(48% as of December 31, 2003). Some of these customers have sale contracts with the Company that guarantee them the production output from specified Company mines at prices based on market quotations or previously agreed (see note 35, Normal Sale Contracts).agreed. Currently, the production of the mining units of the Company is subject to such sale agreements; these agreements have various maturity dates but do not extend beyond DecemberOctober 31, 2011.2012.

  • 23. Operating costs

  • This item is made up as follows:follow:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Contractors

    89,354

    115,313

    122,803

    115,313

    122,803

    137,828

    Supplies

    69,769

    74,359

    84,327

    74,359

    84,327

    88,427

    Personnel expenses

    60,297

    67,134

    82,893

    67,134

    82,893

    75,363

    Other

    54,266

    45,766

    48,051

    Others

    49,194

    47,785

    32,327

    Slow moving and obsolescence supplies reserve, note 10(b)

    624

    2,889

    9,382

    273,686

    302,572

    338,074

    _________

    306,624

    340,697

    343,327

    _________

  • 24. Exploration and development costscost in operational mining sites

  • This item is made up as follow:

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

    Exploration expenses

     

     

     

    Uchucchacua

    22,926

    38,111

    34,797

    Orcopampa

    21,883

    22,628

    26,299

    Antapite

    12,967

    13,817

    18,707

    Shila

    5,034

    4,708

    12,580

    Ishihuinca

    4,129

    6,843

    4,872

    Julcani

    1,627

    4,191

    4,708

    Paula

    1,301

    3,446

    -

    Others

    42

    2,571

    -

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

    69,909

    96,315

    101,963

    Amortization of development costs, note 14(b)

    16,445

    31,120

    34,090

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

     

     

     

     

    86,354

    127,435

    136,053

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

    25. Exploration costs in non-operational mining sites

    This item is made up as follows:

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Exploration expenses

     

     

     

    Uchucchacua

    21,402

    22,926

    38,111

    Orcopampa

    17,493

    21,883

    22,628

    Antapite

    9,589

    12,967

    13,817

    Ishihuinca

    2,420

    4,129

    6,843

    Shila

    4,970

    5,034

    4,708

    Julcani

    2,690

    1,627

    4,191

    Paula

    2,241

    1,301

    3,446

    Other

    1,870

    42

    2,571

     

    62,675

    69,909

    96,315

    Amortization of development costs, note 14(b)

    14,985

    15,806

    30,854

    77,660

    85,715

    127,169

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    In areas external to the mining sites

     

     

     

    Mining concessions agreements

    45,797

    81,812

    85,680

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

    In mining sites

     

     

     

    Huachocolpa

    1,948

    4,507

    6,239

    Julcani

    4,295

    -

    -

    Paula

    2,876

    -

    -

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

    9,119

    4,507

    6,239

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

    Studies and project expenses

    4,339

    1,922

    -

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

    59,255

    88,241

    91,919

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

  • Exploration costs in non-operational mining sites
  • 26. General and administrative expenses

    This item is made up as follows:

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    In areas external to the mining sites

     

     

     

    Joint ventures

    29,893

    45,797

    81,812

    In mining sites

     

     

     

    Huachocolpa

    5,153

    1,948

    4,507

    Julcani

    1,732

    4,295

    -

    Paula

    -

    2,876

    -

    Antapite

    1,889

    -

    -

     

    8,774

    9,119

    4,507

     

     

     

     

    Studies and project expenses

    1,642

    4,339

    1,922

     

    40,309

    59,255

    88,241

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

    Personnel expenses

    29,493

    31,802

    32,369

    Officers' compensation, note 17(b)

    49,594

    2,135

    26,883

    Professional fees

    16,673

    18,569

    20,984

    Board members' remuneration

    3,859

    4,655

    7,407

    Insurance

    1,730

    2,164

    1,970

    Supplies

    943

    1,649

    1,540

    Maintenance

    750

    668

    2,224

    Rentals

    989

    890

    1,227

    Accrual for doubtful receivable, note 9(c)

    5,952

    1,146

    76

    Other expenses

    13,178

    13,188

    17,950

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

     

     

     

     

    123,161

    76,866

    112,630

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

  • General and administrative expenses
  • 27. Royalties

    This item is made up as follows:

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Personnel expenses

    35,023

    29,493

    31,802

    Professional fees

    14,907

    16,673

    18,569

    Board members' remuneration

    3,056

    3,859

    4,655

    Insurance

    1,576

    1,730

    2,164

    Officers' compensation, note 19(b)

    6,744

    49,594

    2,135

    Supplies

    1,554

    943

    1,649

    Accrual for doubtful receivables,
    note 9(c)

    329

    5,952

    1,146

    Rentals

    883

    989

    890

    Maintenance

    793

    750

    668

    Other expenses

    14,433

    13,178

    13,188

     

    79,298

    123,161

    76,866

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    Royalties to third parties, note 36(b)

    25,142

    24,918

    26,143

    Royalties to the Peruvian Government

    -

    6,639

    14,207

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

     

     

     

     

     

    25,142

    31,557

    40,350

     

    _________

    _________

    _________

  • 28. Selling expenses
  • This item is made up as follows:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Freight

    16,714

    18,425

    12,913

    18,425

    12,913

    11,900

    Sundry services

    5,516

    6,231

    3,412

    6,231

    3,412

    2,117

    Others

    2,084

    1,120

    1,514

    1,120

    1,514

    1,847

    24,314

    25,776

    17,839

    _________

     

    25,776

    17,839

    15,864

    _________

  • Interest29. Interests income and expense
  • This item is made up as follows:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Interest income

     

     

    Interest on deposits

    9,070

    5,639

    5,726

    5,639

    5,726

    8,539

    Change in the fair value of the investment fund

    -

    1,813

    5,022

    Change in the fair value of investment fund

    1,813

    5,022

    2,503

    Interest on loans

    145

    333

    1,384

    333

    1,384

    604

    9,215

    7,785

    12,132

    _________

     

    7,785

    12,132

    11,646

    _________

    Interest expense

     

     

    Interest on loans

    (15,473 )

    (7,361 )

    (4,609 )

    Interests on loans

    (7,361)

    (4,609)

    (2,824)

    Others

    (1,229 )

    (1,326 )

    (2,906 )

    (1,326)

    (2,906)

    (2,973)

    (16,702 )

    (8,687 )

    (7,515 )

    _________

     

    (8,687)

    (7,515)

    (5,797)

    _________

  • 30. Other, net

  • This item is made up as follows:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

    Other revenues

     

     

     

     

     

    Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

    1,175

    259

    1,160

    Revenue from insurance

    -

    273

    922

    Dividends received from Cerro Verde

    -

    4,871

    -

    4,871

    -

    Gain from sale of supplies

    3,079

    2,871

    -

    2,871

    -

    Gain from insurance recoverability

    -

    273

    Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

    1,732

    1,175

    259

    Other

    6,276

    2,989

    287

    Others

    2,989

    287

    5,025

    11,087

    7,035

    5,690

    _________

     

     

    Other expeneses

     

    Accretion expense, notes 3 and 19 (c)

    -

    4,724

    7,056

    7,035

    5,690

    7,107

    _________

     

    Other expenses

     

    Accretion expense, notes 3 and 17 (c)

    4,724

    7,056

    7,621

    Additional taxes

    1,246

    2,232

    6,990

    Social disbursements

    1,313

    925

    2,883

    Damages in Colquijirca mining unit

    -

    2,325

    Depreciation, note 13 (c)

    2,643

    1,404

    717

    Labor contingencies

    -

    3,199

    -

    3,443

    1,604

    Additional taxes

    1,540

    1,246

    2,232

    Depreciation, note 13 (c)

    -

    2,643

    1,404

    Project for social development in the department of Huancavelica

    808

    1,313

    925

    Loss from sale of supplies to third parties, net

    -

    805

    Administrative penalties

    -

    1,657

    817

    1,657

    817

    730

    Employee termination bonuses

    1,537

    1,046

    -

    1,046

    -

    Accrual for impairment loss on investments

    1,513

    874

    -

    874

    -

    Other

    2,735

    6,336

    2,757

    Others

    6,336

    3,318

    2,542

    _________

    19,839

    19,195

    25,412

    _________

    8,133

    19,839

    19,195

     

    Net

    2,954

    (12,804 )

    (13,505 )

    (12,804)

    (13,505)

    (18,305)

    _________

  • 31. Income tax and workers' profit sharing

    1. The income tax and workers' profit sharing expense (benefit) amounts shown in the consolidated statements of income are made up as follows:
    2.  

      2002

      2003

      2004

       

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

       

       

       

       

      Expense (benefit) for
      income tax

       

       

       

      Current

       

       

       

      S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

      21,528

      30,683

      37,509

      Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

      -

      6,543

      12,642

      Buenaventura

      -

      -

      10,345

      Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

      -

      -

      8,368

      Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

      -

      -

      2,126

      Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

      -

      -

      1,051

      Minera Shila S.A.C.

      2,321

      -

      -

      Other

      323

      1,283

      620

       

      24,172

      38,509

      72,661

      Deferred

       

       

       

      Buenaventura

      -

      (228,834)

      21,582

      Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

      2,669

      (4,916 )

      7,370

      Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

      -

      (2,798 )

      -

      Minera Shila S.A.C.

      18

      -

      -

      Other

      -

      (247 )

      384

       

      2,687

      (236,795)

      29,336

      Total

      26,859

      (198,286)

      101,997

       

      2002

      2003

      2004

       

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

      S/(000)

       

       

       

       

      Expense (benefit) for workers's profit sharing (i)

       

       

       

      Current

       

       

       

      Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

      -

      2,111

      3,664

      Buenaventura

      -

      -

      2,998

      Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

      -

      -

      2,426

      Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

      -

      -

      373

      Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

      -

      -

      305

      Minera Shila S.A.C.

      748

      -

      -

      Other

      -

      187

      86

       

      748

      2,298

      9,852

      Deferred

       

       

       

      Buenaventura

      -

      (62,896 )

      6,256

      Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

      859

      (1,425 )

      2,136

      Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

      -

      (811 )

      112

      Minera Shila S.A.C.

      6

      -

      -

      Other

      -

      (53)

      -

       

      865

      (65,185 )

      8,504

       

       

       

       

      Total

      1,613

      (62,887 )

      18,356

      (i) In accordance with Peruvian legislation, mining companies that have more than 20 employees should accrue an amount equal to 8 percent of annual taxable income to be distributed under an employee profit-sharing plan. As of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca and Compañía Minera Condesa S.A. have less than 20 employees.

    3. (a) As explained in note 2(q)2(p), Buenaventura and itstheir subsidiaries recognize temporary differences between tax and book basis of assets and liabilities through the recording of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The income tax and workers' profit sharing asset is composed of the following:

     

    Credit (debit) to the consolidated statements of income

     

     

    Credit (debit) to the consolidated statements of income

     

     

    Balance as of January 1st, 2005

    Income tax

    Workers' profit sharing

    Charge to shareholders' equity for change in accounting principle (note 3)

    Balance as of December 31, 2005

    Balance as of January 1st, 2004

    Income tax

    Workers' profit sharing

    Result from exposure to inflation

    Balance as of
    December 31,
    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

    Deferred asset

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Deferred income from sale of future production

    252,746

    (18,149) )

    (5,253) )

    (11,766) )

    217,578

    217,578

    22,021

    6,383

    -

    245,982

    Accrual for mining closing

    14,808

    2,873

    830

    (842))

    17,669

    17,669

    4,186

    1,214

    -

    23,069

    Officers' compensation

    17,142

    (3,428) )

    (994) )

    (798) )

    11,922

    11,922

    678

    196

    -

    12,796

    Slow moving and obsolescence supplies reserves

    3,091

    4,612

    1,337

    -

    9,040

    Exploration expenses

    11,046

    582

    169

    (285) )

    11,512

    11,512

    (2,729)

    (791)

    -

    7,992

    Impairment of property, plant and equipment

    6,281

    (116) )

    (34) )

    (291) )

    5,840

    5,840

    (302)

    (88)

    -

    5,450

    Tax loss carryforward

    3,967

    -

    -

    -

    3,967

    Unrealized gain with affiliates

    4,837

    (352) )

    (102) )

    (224) )

    4,159

    4,159

    (393)

    (114)

    -

    3,652

    Tax loss carryforward

    30,056

    (18,927) )

    (5,925) )

    (1,237) )

    3,967

    Slow moving and obsolescence supplies reserve

    4,089

    (692) )

    (201) )

    (105) )

    3,091

    Royalties payable to the Peruvian government

    -

    1,927

    559

    -

    2,486

    1,946

    (776)

    (225)

    -

    945

    Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable

    1,845

    21

    6

    (86) )

    1,786

    1,786

    286

    83

    -

    2,155

    Accrual for labor contingencies

    -

    1,199

    348

    -

    1,547

    2,087

    561

    163

    -

    2,811

    Other

    3,214

    325

    93

    (90) )

    3,542

    Others

    3,542

    3,461

    1,006

    -

    8,009

    346,064

    (34,737) )

    (10,504) )

    (15,724) )

    285,099

    _________

     

     

     

     

    285,099

    31,605

    9,164

    -

    325,868

    Less - Allowance for deferred asset recoverability

    (20,358) )

    4,641

    1,783

    1,195

    (12,739) )

     

    Less - Allowance for deferred asset

    (12,739)

    (914)

    (266)

    -

    (13,919)

    _________

     

    Deferred asset

    272,360

    30,691

    8,898

    -

    311,949

    325,706

    (30,096)

    (8,721)

    (14,529)

    272,360

    ________

    _________

    ________

    ________

    Deferred liability

     

     

     

     

     

    Deferred stripping costs

    (19,956) )

    -

    -

    (19,956) )

    (19,956)

    -

    19,956

    -

    Other

    (8,309) )

    760

    217

    227

    (7,105) )

    (7,105)

    2,517

    730

    -

    (3,858)

    (28,265) )

    760

    217

    227

    (27,061) )

    _________

    Deferred liability

    (27,061)

    2,517

    730

    19,956

    (3,858)

    297,441

    (29,336) )

    (8,504) )

    (14,302) )

    245,299

    _________

    Deferred asset, net

    245,299

    33,208

    9,628

    19,956

    308,091

    ________

    _________

    ________

    The Company has not recorded a deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing liability originated by the excess of the book basis over the tax basis of the investments in shares due to the following:

    -

    (b) The current and deferred portions of the income tax and workers' sharing expense (benefit) amounts for the years 2003, 2004 and 2005 included in the consolidated statements of income are made up as follows:

  • During
  •  

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    Expense (benefit) for income tax

     

     

     

    Current

     

     

     

    S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

    30,683

    37,509

    44,970

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

    6,543

    12,642

    11,828

    Buenaventura

    -

    10,345

    19,765

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    -

    8,368

    28,107

    Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

    -

    2,126

    1,257

    Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

    -

    1,051

    2,147

    Others

    1,283

    620

    540

     

    38,509

    72,661

    108,614

    Deferred

     

     

     

    Buenaventura

    (228,834)

    21,582

    (28,212)

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    (4,916)

    7,370

    (1,199)

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

    (2,798)

    -

    (3,216)

    Others

    (247)

    384

    (581)

     

    (236,795)

    29,336

    (33,208)

    Total

    (198,286)

    101,997

    75,406

     

     

     

     

    Expense (benefit) for workers' profit sharing (i)

     

     

     

    Current

     

     

     

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    -

    2,426

    8,147

    Buenaventura

    -

    2,998

    5,729

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

    2,111

    3,664

    3,431

    Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

    -

    373

    220

    Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN

    -

    305

    622

    Others

    187

    86

    48

     

    2,298

    9,852

    18,197

     

     

     

     

    Deferred

     

     

     

    Buenaventura

    (62,896)

    6,256

    (8,178)

    Inversiones Colquijirca S.A.

    (1,425)

    2,136

    (348)

    Inversiones Mineras del Sur S.A.

    (811)

    112

    (934)

    Others

    (53)

    -

    (168)

     

    (65,185)

    8,504

    (9,628)

    Total

    (62,887)

    18,356

    8,569

    (i) In accordance with Peruvian legislation, mining companies that have more 20 employees should accrue an amount equal to 8 percent of annual taxable income to be distributed under an employee profit-sharing plan. As of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca Contacto Corredores de Seguros S.A. and Compañía Minera Condesa S.A. have less than 20 employees.

    (c) During 2003, 2004 and 2005 the Company recorded expenses (income)provision for tax and workers' profit sharing due to:recorded in the consolidated income statement is as follow:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

     

    Income before income tax and workers' profit sharing

    469,648

    37,298

    834,174

    37,298

    834,174

    1,101,377

    Effective combined rate

    32.84 %

    35.60 %

    Expected income tax and workers' profit sharing according effective combined rate

    154,232

    12,249

    296,966

    Legal combined rate

    32.84%

    35.60%

    Expected income tax and workers' profit sharing according to the legal combined rate

    12,249

    296,966

    392,090

     

    Permanent differences

     

     

    Share in affiliated companies (i)

    (116,242)

    (183,102)

    (205,005)

    (183,102)

    (205,005)

    (309,986)

    Effect of fair value of derivative instruments (ii)

    -

    66,250

    (5,208 )

    73,085

    20,923

    31,282

    Realized loss in derivative instruments (ii)

    -

    6,835

    26,131

    Effect of fair value of derivative contracts turned into normal sales contracts (iii)

    -

    (94,794)

    -

    Effect of fair value of derivative contracts turned into normal sale contracts (iii)

    (94,794)

    -

    (61,424)

    Gain in exchange difference at derivative instruments

    -

    1,886

    Change in valuation allowance

    (6,145)

    (53,944)

    -

    (53,944)

    -

    1,180

    Effect on change in tax rate (iv)

    -

    (21,978)

    -

    Gain in normal sale contracts due to market price difference

    -

    3,765

    Non-deductible exploration expenses

    -

    3,430

    2,219

    Amortization of non-current assets

    -

    1,620

    2,259

    Effect of change in tax rate

    (21,978)

    -

    Other permanent items

    (3,373)

    7,311

    7,469

    7,311

    2,419

    20,704

    (125,760)

    (273,422)

    (176,61 )

    (273,422)

    (176,613)

    (308,115)

    Income tax and workers' profit sharing expense (benefit)

    28,472

    (261,173)

    120,353

     

    Total

    (261,173)

    120,353

    83,975

    (i) According to current Peruvian tax regulations, the equity participation in affiliates, including dividends received, are not taxable.

    (ii) According to current Peruvian tax regulations, the loss on derivative instruments is not deductible to the extent it is generated abroad.

    (iii) Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted IAS 39, recording the initial effect of the fair value of all derivative contracts in the equity account: retained earnings (loss). In December 2003 and May 2005, the Company modified certain conditions of its derivative contracts to qualify them as sales contracts; pursuant to this revision, the related loss (negative fair value) became a temporary difference under current Peruvian tax regulations. The income tax effect on the loss recorded in retained earnings has been recorded as a benefit of thein each year because the change of status of a permanent, to a temporary item occurred in December 2003.2003 and May 2005.

    (iv) Effective April 1, 2004, the statutory income tax rate in Peru is 30 percent. Until December 31, 2003, the income tax rate was 27 percent. In both periods the workers' profit sharing rate was 8 percent.

  • 32. Basic and diluted earningsearning per share

    The computation of the basicBasic and diluted earningsearning per share for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 is presented below:

     

    For the year ended December 31, 2002

    For the year ended December 31, 2003

    For the year ended December 31,2004

     

    Net income (numerator)

    Shares (denominator)

    Earnings
    per share

    Net income
    (numerator)

    Shares (denominator)

    Earnings
    per share

    Net income
    (numerator)

    Shares (denominator)

    Earnings
    per share

     

    S/

     

    S/

    S/

     

    S/

    S/

     

    S/

    Basic and diluted income per share before the cumulative effect of accounting change

    415,715,000

    127,236,219

    3.27

    247,448,000

    127,236,219

    1.95

    685,650,000

    127,236,219

    5.39

    Cumulative effect of accounting change for mining closing costs

    -

    127,236,219

    -

    (72,295,000)

    127,236,219

    (0.57)

    -

    127,236,219

    -

    Basic and diluted net income per share

    415,715,000

    127,236,219

    3.27

    175,153,000

    127,236,219

    1.38

    685,650,000

    127,236,219

    5.39

     

    For the year ended December 31, 2003

    For the year ended December 31, 2004

    For the year ended December 31, 2005

     

    Net income
    (numerator)

    Shares
    (denominator)

    Earnings
    per share

    Net income
    (numerator)

    Shares
    (denominator)

    Earnings
    per share

    Net income
    (numerator)

    Shares
    (denominator)

    Earnings
    per share

     

    S/.

     

    S/.

    S/.

     

    S/.

    S/.

     

    S/.

    Basic and diluted income per share before the cumulative effects of accounting changes

    247,448,000

    127,236,219

    1.95

    685,650,000

    127,236,219

    5.39

    951,399,000

    127,229,844

    7.48

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Cumulative effect of accounting change due to mine closing

    (72,295,000)

    127,236,219

    (0.57)

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    Cumulative effect of accounting change due to stripping costs

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    (10,416,000)

    127,229,844

    (0.08)

     

    __________

     

    __________

    __________

     

    _________

    __________

     

    __________

    Basic and diluted net income per share

    175,153,000

    127,236,219

    1.38

    685,650,000

    127,236,219

    5.39

    940,983,000

    127,229,844

    7.40

     

    __________

     

    __________

    __________

     

    _________

    __________

     

    __________

    The number of shares to be used as the denominator in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 was determined as follows:

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

    Common shares

    137,444,962

    137,444,962

    137,444,962

    Investment shares

    372,320

    372,320

    372,320

     

    137,817,282

    137,817,282

    137,817,282

    Less - Treasury shares

    (10,581,063)

    (10,581,063)

    (10,581,063)

     

    127,236,219

    127,236,219

    127,236,219

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

    Common shares

    137,444,962

    137,444,962

    137,444,962

    Investment shares

    372,320

    372,320

    372,320

     

    137,817,282

    137,817,282

    137,817,282

    Less - Treasury shares

    (10,581,063)

    (10,581,063)

    (10,596,118)

     

    127,236,219

    127,236,219

    127,221,164

    Weighted average number of shares outstanding

    127,236,219

    127,236,219

    127,229,844

  • 33. Disclosure about information by segments

  • International Accounting Standard (IAS) 14, revised, requires enterprises to disclose financial information by business and/or geographical segment. Companies should consider their organizational and management structure and their internal financial reporting system when identifying segments. Segments are generally defined by the manner in which the Company presents data to high-level management for their use in evaluating each units past performance. The most important segment is Mining, which activities are carried out through nine companies. Management basesconsiders that these mining companies can be combined into one reportable mining segment because they show similar financial performance and similar characteristics related to the nature of their decisions onproducts, the nature of their production process, their clients and evaluates business development in terms of the mining segments' performance.legal environment. The electric, mining consulting and insurance segments are not significant and, therefore, are not considered in the making of decisions or in the evaluation of business development. Management therefore considersTherefore, management consi ders that the Company's only reportable segment is mining.

  • 34. Derivative financial instruments

    1. Risk of metal price fluctuations -
    2. (a) Derivative contracts -

      Buenaventura holds contracts of derivative instruments with the intention to hedge the fluctuations in metal prices; however, the Company does not meet all the criteria stated in IAS 39 to account for the derivative instruments as cash flow hedges. In addition, the subsidiary El Brocal maintains contracts of derivative instruments that qualify as cash flows hedges.

      The table below presents a summary of the commodity derivative contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2004:2005:

    Metal

    Metal

    Quantity (ounces)

    Price range

    Period

    _____________________________

     

    Minimal

    Maximum

    (US$/Oz)

     

    Gold

    52,500292,500 (i)

    849,000340,000

    343 to 366.7345 a 356.59

    January 20052006 - July 2011

    Silver

    500,000200,000 (ii)

    3,200,000400,000

    5.84 to 6.166.00

    January 20052006 - August 2006

    (i) Guaranteed with an average price of US$345 per ounce only and when gold price is above US$285.00 per ounce.

    (ii) Guaranteed with a minimum price of US$6.00 per ounce (only and when silver price is above US$4.00 per ounce.

    Related to the derivative instruments contracts maintained during 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, Buenaventura and El Brocal recorded the following:

    -

    In addition, the liability presented in the consolidated balance sheets for S/70,927,000.59,138,000 and S/267,852,000.168,017,000 as current and non-current portions, respectively, corresponds to the fair value of derivative instruments of Buenaventura as of December 31, 20042005 (S/99,893,000.70,927,000 and S/307,826,000.267,852,000 as current and non-current portions, respectively, as of December 31, 2003)2004).

    In 2006, Buenaventura's management has decided to change the nature of the derivative contracts as of December 31, 2005 in order to qualify them as normal sale contracts. The values of these contracts will be settled on the date that the modifications are accepted by Buenaventura and the counterparty.

    (b) Normal sale contracts of gold zinc and silver

    Effective December 30During 2005 and 31, 2003, Buenaventura modified the terms of certain derivative instruments contracts in order to qualify them as normal sale contracts. The fair valueLikewise, during 2004, El Brocal made similar changes to their derivative contracts in order to qualify them as normal sale contracts. As of December 31, 2005, the settled values for these contracts at the date prioramounting to the modification of terms amounted to S/709,963,000.107,079,000 and wasS/.613,791,000, as current and non-current liabilities, respectively are presented as "deferred revenueincome from sale of future production" in the Consolidated Balance Sheetconsolidated balance sheets (S/.74,937,000 and S/.568,772,000 like current and non-current liabilities as of December 31, 2003.2004). Since this date, such amount will be credited to salesincome as delivery of the committed ounces of gold occurs.

    In 2004,2005, Buenaventura delivered 198,000282,000 ounces of gold as part of the sale contracts above mentioned.mentioned (198,000 ounces in 2004). As a consequence, Buenaventura recognized revenues of S/68,837,000 that are separately presented.92,753,000 in the Consolidated Statementscaption "realized revenue from sale of Income as partfuture production" in the consolidated statements of Total Revenues.income (S/.68,837,000 during 2004).

    As of December 31, 20042005 Buenaventura is committed to sell 1,844,0001,981,000 ounces of gold at prices ranging from US$332 toup US$451 per ounce until December 2011.

  • Foreign currency exchange risk -
  • BuenaventuraOctober 2012. During 2005, El Brocal has entered into a forward currency exchange contract for US$7,414,000, at rates ranging from S/3.554 to S/3.589 per U.S. dollar,complied with all the settled deliveries of zinc and stated maturities similar to time deposits, see note 6. In 2004, this operation has generated a loss for approximately S/1,818,000 (S/2,436,000 in 2003), basically resulting from a lower market exchange currency rate compared to the agreed exchange rate. The fair value of this contract as of December 31, 2004 amounts to S/2,182,000 (S/773,000 as of December 31, 2003) and is presented in the caption "other current liabilities" of the Consolidated Balance Sheets, see note 19.silver.

  • 35. Fair value of financial instruments

    The information about fair value of the financial instruments, including derivatives, is presented below:

    - Current monetary assets and liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturities of these financial instruments.

    - The fair value of the investment held in Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A. is S/270,600,000 as of December 31, 2004 (S/223,399,000 as of December 31, 2003).

    - The estimated fair value of the long-term debt kept by El Brocal and Inminsur is similar to its book value, as the terms and interest rates are from the market.

    - The estimated fair value of the derivative contracts is S/338,779,000.227,155,000 and is based on quotations received from the Company's counter-parties,counter- parties, see note 35.34.

  • 36. Commitments and contingencies

    1. Contingencies

      (a) Environmental matters -

    2. The Company's mining and exploration activities are subject to environmental protection standards. In order to comply with these standards, the Company has presented preliminary studies covering of environmental and Environmental Adjustment and Management Programs (PAMA) for each of the mining units. The Ministry of Energy and Mines has approved the PAMAs related to Uchucchacua, Julcani, Orcopampa, Colquijirca, Ishihuinca, Huachocolpa, Shila and Paula, as well as the Environmental Impact Study (EIA) of Antapite. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the activities as defined in the PAMAs respective to the Uchucchacua, Julcani, Orcopampa, Colquijirca and Ishihuinca mining units had been completed.

      On October 14, 2003, the Congress issued the Law 28090 which regulates the procedures and commitments that the mining activities must follow in order to elaborate, file and implement a mining site closing plan, as well as establishes the constitution of a guarantee to assure the compliance of the committed plan. At the dateplan in connection with protection, conservation and recuperation of the report,environment standards.

      On August 15, 2005 the corresponding ruling was approved. In accordance with the first regulation, is pendingthe mining site closing plans approved before the issuance of this ruling have to be issued.comply with to the new rules in a term no greater than nine months since its publication.

    3. During the year 2005 the Company made disbursements in connection with activities included in the mining site closing plans by S/.10,738,000 (S/.5,691,000 and S/.3,637,000 during the years 2004 and 2003). As of December 31, 2005, the Company has recognized a liability of S/.92,371,000 (S/.67,521,000 as of December 31, 2004) related to its future obligations for the closing of the mining units, see note 17(a).

      On July 6, 2004, the Peruvian Congress enacted the Law N'28271 "Law that Regulates the Environmental Liabilities for the Mining Activity". This law has the purpose to regulate the identification of environmental liabilities of mining activities and the financing to restore the affected areas. According to this law, an environmental liability corresponds to the impact caused to the environment by mining activities, Buenaventura's management is performing an inventory in areas currently abandoned or inactive in which the company previously carried-out exploitation activities, in order to determine what activities are necessary. In Buenaventura's management opinion, the impact of these obligations is not significant for the 2005 financial statements.

      (b) Land and mineral rights leases -

    4. The Company has obtained the right to operate in certain areas through the execution of land lease contracts, as shown below:

    Lease holder

    Leaseholder

    Leasing company

    Year in which the contracts end

    Royalties

    Compañía de Minas

    Buenaventura S.A.A.

    Sindicato Minero Orcopampa S.A. (Arequipa)

    2043

    10%10 % of the valorized production subject to certain conditions.

    Inversiones Mineras
    del Sur S.A.

    El Futuro de Ica S.R.L. (Arequipa)

    2015

    7%7 % of concentrateconcentrates revenues.

    Royalty expenses, which are included in the operating expenses section of the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Income,income, are allocated among the mineral rights lease contracts, as follows:

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2002

    2003

    2004

    S/.(000)

    S/(000)

     

    Sindicato Minero Orcopampa S.A.

    13,561

    22,869

    22,706

    22,869

    22,706

    23,932

    El Futuro de Ica S.R.L.

    1,120

    2,273

    2,212

    2,273

    2,212

    2,211

    14,681

    25,142

    24,918

    25,142

    24,918

    26,143

    Royalties payable amount to S/2,513,000.2,874,000 as of December 31, 20042005 (S/4,620,000.2,513,000 as of December 31, 2003)2004), see Note 19(a)17(a).

  • (c) Mineral Interest
    The Company's activities in Peru depend on mining concessions for exploration, being obtained from the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines, or MEM. In addition, the Company's activities in Peru depend on provisional permits, obtained from the MEM for exploration rights of the area of the claim, and together with mining concessions and/or processing concessions, obtained from the MEM, for treatment of mining ores, or processing concessions. Under Peru's current legal and regulatory regime, our mining concessions have an indefinite term, contingent upon payment of the annual concession fee for each mining right. The mining rights are maintained by meeting a minimum annual level of production or investment and by the annual payment of a concession fee. A fine is payable for the years in which minimum production or investment requirements are not met. In addition if, in any year, the concession fee is not paid, payment may be made the following year within the term provided for making such payment. Any payment made will be applied to the prior year if such prior year was not paid. Failure to pay such concession fees or fines for two consecutive years could result in the loss of one or more of the mining rights. In Management's opinion the Company is current in the payment of all amounts due in respect to its mining and processing concessions.

    (d)Legal processes of Buenaventura -

  • Damages claimed by a French citizen
    Demand presented at the Federal Court at the United States of America -

    In February of 2002, the CompanyBuenaventura and its subsidiariy Compañía Minera Condesa, S.A.C. (Condesa), together with Newmont Mining, Newmont Second and certain individual persons, were defendantsnamed in ana legal action initiated by a French citizen with jurisdiction beforein the DistrictFederal Court of the stateUnited Stated of Colorado in the United States.America - Tenth Circuit (Colorado). The plaintiff alleges that hethis French citizen was engaged as an advisor to Normandy respective to a lawsuit that concluded in Octoberaffected by the revocation of 1998, and that such lawsuit separately motivated the execution of a Global Transaction Agreement in 2000 between the Company, BRGM,Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres (BRGM), Mine Or Normandy and their related entities (SEREM).over preferential rights on the shares of CEDIMIN. The Global Transaction Agreement provided for full and permanent revocation and annulment of any preferential rights on the shares of Compañía de Exploraciones, Desarrollo e Inversiones Mineras S.A.C. - CEDIMIN.CEDIMIN was in exchange for a one-timeone time payment of US$80 million, by the Company, of which the CompanyBuenaventura paid US$40 million.million

    The plaintiff asserts that he was injured because Normandy had promisedOn March 16, 2005 all the involved parts reached to pay himan extrajudicial agreement. As a commission based fee if he was able to increaseconsequence of this agreement, the amountdemand, pending of the Company's payment as ordered by the Court, which did not occur, and seeks damages of not less than US$25 million plus interest, in addition to unspecified punitive damages that could increase the amount by threefold. Additionally, the plaintiff alleges violations of the federal RICO statute and similar provisions of Colorado law, interference with contract rights, defamation and other damages.

    The defendants have filed various motions to dismiss the action; however, rather than responding to these motions for dismissal, the plaintiff has filed another demand. The Company and Condesa have presented motions to reject the new demand. On January 15, 2004, the judge Richard P. Matsch of the District Colorado Court dismissed the demands. On February 15, 2004 the plaintiff appealed the opinion of the judge tomotion at the Federal Court of the United States of America - Tenth Circuit (Colorado). Atand subsequently dismissed by the date of this report, it is not possible to predict when the court will rule on the motions.

    In Management's and legal advisors' opinion, the final outcome of this process will not have a significant adverse effect on the Company's financial statements as of December 31, 2004.District Court, was filed definitively.

    Other -

    From time to time in the normal course of its activities, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings of a diverse nature. Management believes that any possible loss, which may result from these lawsuits, will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company's financial position.

  • Legal processes of Yanacocha
  • Mercury spill in Choropampa -

    In June, 2000 a Yanacocha's contractor spilled approximately 11 liters of mercury nearby Choropampa, located at 84.8 kilometers from Yanacocha. As a result of the accident, September 10, 2001, 900 Peruvian citizens sue Yanacocha and other persons involved at the District Court of the state of Colorado, United States of America (hereinafter "the Court"). The plaintiffs demand compensations by the damages originated by this spill. In May 22, 2002 the Court misestimated the demand, which was ratified later in June 30, 2002. The plaintiffs appealed this resolution.

    In July 2002, a new demand was presented against Yanacocha and other subsidiaries of Newmont Mining Corporation at the same Court, by other 140 Peruvian citizens who added themselves to the original demand, demanding similar compensations to those of the first demand. This new demand is in suspense until the appeal of the first one is defined. To this date, Yanacocha considers that it is not possible to predict the final result of these demands and believes that any effect related to them would not be significant to its financial statements.

    Arbitration with a contractor -

    In June of 2004, as part of the process of conciliation with a Yanacocha contractor, the Management of this Company decided to pay an indemnification of US$2.5 million. With this payment, Yanacocha concluded the process of arbitration initiated in November, 2003, related to the contractual dispute in the civil construction made in Carachugo. The original amount of the reclamation was of approximately US$12 million.

  • Transactions37. Transaction with affiliated companies
    1. (a) The Company had the following transactions with its affiliated companies during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004:

    2. 2005:

      S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca ("Chaupiloma") -


      Chaupiloma is the legal owner of the mineral rights on the mining concessions exploited by Yanacocha, and receives a 3 percent royalty on the net sales of Yanacocha. In 2004,2005, royalties earned amounted to S/128,889,000.152,342,000 (S/82,350,000.116,857,000 and S/116,957,000.128,889,000 in 20022003 and 2003,2004, respectively) and are presented as "royalty"royalties income" in the consolidated statements of income.

      Compañía Minera Condesa S.A. ("Condesa") -

      During 2004,2005, Compañía Minera Condesa S.A. received cash dividends from Yanacocha for approximately S/414,911,000.264,034,000 (S/83,070,000.482,025,000 and S/482,025,000.414,911,000 in 20022003 and 2003,2004, respectively).

      Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A. ("Bisa") -

      In March of 2002, Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A. signed a technical service agreement with Yanacocha to perform a number of specialized activities and services. Pursuant to the agreement, the services performed will be related to the construction of mining projects and will include completion of analysis and studies, work plan design, and functions related to planning, monitoring and administrating the infrastructure projects required by Yanacocha in its operations. This contract will expireexpired on December 31, 2004 and was renewed in January, 2005 under the same terms.

      In 2004,2005, the revenues related to this service contract amounted to approximately S/10,176,000.12,343,000 (S/11,408,000.11,408,000 and S/.10,176,000 in 2003)2003 and 2004 respectively).

      The profit between Bisa and Yanacocha is not significant and, therefore, has not been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

      Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A. ("Conenhua") -

      In November of 2000, Conenhua signed an agreement with Yanacocha for the construction and operation of a 220 kW transmission line between Trujillo and Cajamarca, a 60 kW transmission line between Cajamarca and La Pajuela, and the Cajamarca Norte substation; this agreement also encompassed activities necessary to enlarge the Trujillo substation. Pursuant to this contract, the construction work finished in October 2001. Concurrently, Yanacocha and the CompanyConenhua signed a 10-year agreement covering electric energy transmission and infrastructure operation beginning November 2001. In exchange for Buenaventura operating and managing the transmission project, Yanacocha will pay an annual fee of US$3.7 million. During 2004,2005, the revenues for these services amounted to approximately S/13,265,000.12,813,000 in 2005 (S/.14,282,000 and S/.13,265,000 in 2003 and 2004, (S/14,282,000 in 2003)respectively).

      The profit between Conenhua and Yanacocha is not significant and, therefore, has not been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

    3. (b) As a result of the above and other minor transactions, the Company has the following accounts receivable from affiliated companies:

     

    2002

    2003

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Minera Yanacocha S.R.L.

    36,761

    45,708

    Other

    937

    370

     

    37,698

    46,078

     

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

    Minera Yanacocha S.R.L.

    45,708

    65,666

    Others

    370

    372

     

    46,078

    66,038

  • 38. Summary of significant differences between accounting principles followed by the Company and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
  • On February 18, 2005, the Company issued itsThe Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Peruvian GAAP which differs in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. Subsequent to that date, the Company has prepared the informationThe effects of these differences are reflected in notesNote 39 and 40 realatingare principally related to the nature and effect of differences between Peruvian GAAP and U.S. GAAP.items discussed in the following paragraphs:

    Restatement of financial statements for general price level changes

    Peruvian GAAP - Until December 31, 2004, Peruvian GAAP requirerequired the restatement of assets and liabilities into constant Peruvian Nuevos Soles as of the date of the latest financial statements presented. All non-monetary assets and liabilities and income statement amounts have beenwere restated to reflect changes in the Peruvian wholesale price index, from the date the assets were acquired or the liabilities were incurred to the year-end. The purchasing power gain (loss) included in income (loss) reflects the effect of Peruvian inflation on the monetary liabilities of the Company during the year, net of the loss resulting from the effect of inflation on monetary assets held. Effective January 1, 2005, this accounting treatment has been discontinued.
    See Note 2(a).

    U.S. GAAP - Under U.S. GAAP, account balances and transactions are stated in the units of currency of the period when the transactions are originated. This accounting model is commonly known as the historical cost basis of accounting. SEC rules establish that foreign private issuers that prepare their financial statements in a reporting currency that comprehensively includes the effects of price level changes are not required to eliminate such effects in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. Therefore, the U.S. GAAP reconciliation of net income and shareholders' equity shown in Note 40 does not reflect as a difference the effect of the general price level restatement.

    Impairment of long-lived assets

    Peruvian GAAP - Up to December 31, 2000, impairment loss of long-lived assets was not mandatory under Peruvian GAAP; therefore, Peruvian corporations did not recognize any impairment loss as of that date. Effective January 1st, 2001, impairment loss of long-lived assets is recognized according to International Accounting Standard (IAS) 36, "Impairment of Assets". See Note 2(k).

    Impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the book value of an asset exceeds the higher of its net selling price or valueShares in use. The value in use of an asset is generally calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to be earned from continual use of the assetYanacocha and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. An impairment loss recognized in a previous year is reversed if events or changes occur that indicate the estimates used when the impairment loss was recognized should be adjusted to reflect a more favorable cash flow scenario.

    U.S. GAAP - Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard N.144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" superseded SFAS 121. SFAS 144 establishes a single accounting model, based on the framework of SFAS 121 ("Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of"), for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale.

    Under SFAS 144, an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which asset-carrying value exceeds fair value. Fair value is generally determined using estimated cash flows analysis. Impairment is considered to exist if total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the asset. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows. Once recognized, an impairment loss is not reversed.

    Share in YanacochaCerro Verde

    Peruvian GAAP - Under Peruvian GAAP, specifically IAS 28 - Accounting for Investments in Associates, the investor's financial statements are usually prepared using uniform accounting policies for like transactions and events in similar circumstances. In many cases, if an associate uses accounting policies other than those adopted by the investor for like transactions and events in similar circumstances, appropriate adjustments are made to the associate's financial statements when they are used by the investor in applying the equity method. Under

    Based on the above mentioned, under Peruvian GAAP, the Company recognizes the equity participation in Yanacocha and Cerro Verde using the financial statements of this entitythese entities prepared under U.S. GAAP due tobecause these statements recognize the appropriate adjustments to reflect the current accounting policies of Buenaventura.

    In addition, Buenaventura maintains the payment made in excess over the bookfair value of assets and liabilities Yanacocha's and Cerro Verde's shares (recorded as mining concession within the investment caption) in Peruvian Nuevos Soles, its reporting currency.

    U.S. GAAP - The consolidated results and shareholders' equity include the shareshares in Yanacocha and Cerro Verde obtained from Yanacocha'sthose entities financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    Under U.S. GAAP, the mining concession in Yanacocha and Cerro Verde must be kept in the same functional and reporting currency of this entity,these entities, that is U.S. dollars, and not in Peruvian Nuevos Soles. The effect of amortizing the mining concession using the U.S. dollars basis instead of Peruvian Nuevos Soles originates reconciliation items, in results of operations and in comprehensive income, see Note 40.39.

    Deferred Income Tax

    Peruvian GAAP-WhenGAAP - When an enterprise makes a distinction between current and non-current assets and liabilities in its financial statements, it should not classify deferred income tax assets (liabilities) as current assets (liabilities).

    U.S.GAAP - Deferred income tax liabilities and assets shall be classified as current or non-current based on the classification of the related asset oro liability for financial reporting purposes.

    Workers' profit sharing

    Peruvian GAAP - Workers' profit sharing expense (income) is separately presented in the consolidated statements of income in a similar way as income tax expense (income). Also, deferred workers' profit sharing asset (liability) is separately presented in the consolidated balance sheets in a similar way as deferred income tax assets (liabilities).

    U.S. GAAP - The common practice is to recognize the workers' profit sharing expense (income) as part of operating expense (income). Also, deferred workers' profit sharing assets (liabilities) shall be classified as current or non-current based on the classification of the related assets or liability for financial reporting purposes.

    Available-for-sale investmentsChange in the valuation method of Cerro Verde's investment

    Peruvian GAAP - UntilAs explained in Note 12(j), in December 31, 2002 investments2005 Buenaventura decided to account for its investment in which the Company's interest is lower than 20 percent (Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.) were stated at cost, less any permanent impairment. Effective January 1, 2003,using the Company adopted IAS 39, "Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement". Under IAS 39, such investments mustequity method, since this investment no longer met the criteria to be recorded at its fair value, withvalue. The accounting effects resulting from the resulting unrealized gain or loss recorded directly to a separate componentapplication of the equity until realized, at which timemethod since the gain or loss isdate of the initial acquisition occurred in 1996 were fully recorded in income.

    If the decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis and the amount of the write-down is included in earnings (that is, accounted for as a realized loss). The new cost basis is2005. Prior periods were not changed for subsequent recoveries in fair value.adjusted retroactively.

    U.S. GAAP - Under U.S. GAAP, specifically APB 18 - The investments must be classified, according to management's intent, into oneEquity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, when the investor adopts the equity method of accounting, the investment, results of operations (current and prior periods presented), and retained earnings of the following categories: trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. Available-for-sale investmentsinvestor should be marked-to-fair value,adjusted retroactively in a manner consistent with the resulting unrealized gain or loss recorded directlyaccounting for a step-by-step acquisition of a subsidiary. Therefore, the consolidated balance sheets and shareholders' equity for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the consolidated statements of income for the years 2003 and 2004, have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the accounting of the investment in Cerro Verde under the equity method, see note 39.

    Guarantees

    Peruvian GAAP - Under Peruvian GAAP, when an enterprise issues a separate component of equity until realized, at which time the gain or loss is recorded in income.

    If the decline in fair value is judgedguarantee, this commitment has to be other than temporary,disclosed in the cost basis of the individual security is written downnotes to fair value as a new cost basis and the amount of the write-down is included in earnings (that is, accounted for as a realized loss). The new cost basis is not changed for subsequent recoveries in fair value.

    The U.S. GAAP difference is onlyfinancial statements. A liability related to the 2002 year,guarantee will be recognized when the available-for-sale investments were recorded at cost (under Peruvian-GAAP) and not at fair value. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the investment in Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.it is presented at fair value; therefore, there is no U.S. GAAP difference as of December 31, 2003 and 2004.

    Mining concessions

    Peruvian GAAP -Net cost of mining concessions are presented in a separate captionprobable that resources of the consolidated balance sheets.Company will be required to settle the obligation and it can be reasonably estimated.

    U.S. GAAP - In March 2004, the EITF 04-2 reached to the consensus that mineral rights are tangible assets, and, accordingly, the Company has accounted for its mining concessions as part of property, plant and equipment.

    Amortization of goodwill

    Peruvian GAAP - In 2001, Buenaventura paid an amount in excess of the book value of the shares of its subsidiary Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A., (Conenhua is not a mining company) and amortizes such excess (goodwill) using the straight-line method over a 10-year period.

    U.S. GAAP, especially FIN 456 - StatementGuarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, requires that upon issuance of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, "Goodwill and other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"), effective January 1, 2002, requires, among other things, the discontinuance of amortization related to goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. These assets will then be subject to an impairment test at least annually, and in the case of the Company is at year-end.

    Capitalization of interest

    Peruvian GAAP - Interest costs during asset construction are not capitalized.

    U.S. GAAP - Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 34 "Capitalization of Interest Cost" ("SFAS 34"), states thatcertain guarantees, a portion of interest paid during periods in which assets were constructed or developedguarantor must be capitalized. It is assumed that the proceeds of loans outstanding during construction periods were used to fund the construction.

    No allocation of the interest paid relating to assets constructed or developed was included in the reconciliation presented in Note 40 as the interest to be allocated was not material (accumulated effect of S/702,000 as of December 31, 2004).

    Derivative financial instruments

    Peruvian GAAP - The Company uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate certain market risks to which the Company is exposed. Until December 31, 2002, the Company disclosedrecognize a liability for the fair value of derivative instrumentsan obligation assumed under the guarantee.

    As a guarantor, Buenaventura is involved in the notesfinancial guarantees related to Cerro Verde debt-financing facility, see note 12 (o) to the consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company recognizes derivative instruments as assets or liabilities, measured at their fair value, in its consolidated balance sheets pursuant to IAS 39, "Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement". Changes in the derivative's fair value will be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Gains and losses on derivative hedging instruments must be recorded in either a separate caption of equity or current earnings, depending on the nature of the instrument. See Note 2(s).

    U.S. GAAP - SFAS N.133 requires recognition of all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities and measurement at fair value. Changes in the derivative's fair value will be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Gains and losses on derivative hedging instruments must be recorded in either other comprehensive income or current earnings, depending on the nature of the instrument.

    The U.S. GAAP difference is related to years prior to 2003, when derivative financial instruments were not recorded at fair value under Peruvian GAAP. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, these financial instruments are recorded2005, under U.S. GAAP, such guarantees should be accounted for at fair value, under Peruvian GAAP and U.S. GAAP; therefore, there is no U.S. GAAP difference as of December 31, 2003 and 2004.which was not deemed significant.

    Joint Ventures

    Peruvian GAAP - See accounting policy in note 2(i) to the consolidated financial statements.

    U.S. GAAP - The Company is party to joint venture agreements with other companies in the mining industry for purposes of exploring potential mine sites and accounts for its interests using under proportional consolidation. Such interests would have been accounted for under USGAAP using the equity method. However, as allowed in Item 17 (c) (2) (vii) of Form 20-F, the Company has elected to omit the differences in classification that may result from such arrangement for any joint venture that is an operating entity and that is jointly controlled, by contractual agreements, by all parties with equity interest in the entity.

  • 39. Reconciliation between net income and shareholders' equity determined under Peruvian GAAP and U.S. GAAP
  • The following is a summary of the adjustments to net income for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and to shareholders' equity as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 that would be required if U.S. GAAP had been applied instead of Peruvian GAAP in the consolidated financial statements:

     

    For the years ended December 31,

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Income before cumulative effect of accounting change according to the financial statements prepared under Peruvian GAAP

    415,715

    247,448

    685,650

    Items increasing (decreasing) reported net income

     

     

     

    Fair value of derivative instruments

    (334,639)

    -

    -

    Write-down of an available-for-sale investment to fair value

    (5,957 )

    -

    -

    Depreciation originated by the impaired long-lived assets

    644

    779

    709

    Share in Yanacocha's equity - restated, see (a)

    (35,782 )

    -

    -

    Share in Yanacocha's equity - mining concession

    578

    1,031

    1,875

    Amortization of goodwill of Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

    933

    909

    994

    Effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments on minority interest (b)

    2,084

    47

    (78 )

    Deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing assets, net (c)

    -

    1,117

    (253 )

    Net adjustments

    (372,139 )

    3,883

    3,247

    Net income before cumulative effect of accounting change under U.S. GAAP

    43,576

    251,331

    688,897

    Cumulative effect of accounting change from mine closing costs

    -

    (72,295 )

    -

    Net income under U.S. GAAP

    43,576

    179,036

    688,897

    Other comprehensive income (loss) -

     

     

     

    Cumulative translation adjustment

    (7,570 )

    (39,612 )

    (127,119)

    Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments

    -

    209,130

    47,201

    Fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments

    -

    (8,085)

    5,303

    Other

    -

    -

    912

    Total comprehensive income under U.S. GAAP

    36,006

    340,469

    615,194

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) under U.S. GAAP

     

     

     

    Cumulative translation adjustment

    (1,255 )

    (40,867)

    (167,986)

    Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments

    (6,914 )

    202,216

    249,417

    Fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments

    -

    (8,085)

    (2,782)

    Other

    -

    -

    912

    Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) under U.S. GAAP

    (8,169 )

    153,264

    79,561

    Basic and diluted income per share before cumulative effect of accounting change under U.S. GAAP

    0.34

    1.98

    5.41

    Cumulative effect of accounting change from mine closing costs

    -

    (0.57 )

    -

    Basic and diluted income per share under U.S. GAAP

    0.34

    1.41

    5.41

     

    For the years ended December 31,

     

    2003

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

     

    Net income

    175,153

    685,650

    940,983

     

     

     

     

    Items increasing (decreasing) reported net income

     

     

     

    Share in Yanacocha's equity - mining concession

    1,031

    1,875

    1,452

    Effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments on minority interest (a)

    47

    (78)

    (24)

    Deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing assets, net

    1,117

    (253)

    (143)

    Share in Cerro Verde's equity - restated (b)

    14,176

    27,595

    -

    Result from exposure to inflation - restated (b)

    576

    2,046

    -

    Reversal of Cerro Verde's dividends - restated (b)

    -

    (4,870)

    -

    Other

    779

    709

    401

     

     

     

     

    Net adjustments

    17,726

    27,024

    1,686

     

     

     

     

    Net income under U.S. GAAP

    192,879

    712,674

    942,669

    Other comprehensive income (loss) -

     

     

     

    Cumulative translation adjustment in Yanacocha

    (39,612)

    (127,119)

    87,876

    Cumulative translation adjustment in Cerro Verde - restated (b)

    (1,808)

    (7,166)

    18,907

    Fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments

    (6,343)

    5,303

    1,040

    Other

    -

    912

    -

     

     

     

     

    Total comprehensive income under U.S. GAAP

    145,116

    584,604

    1,050,492

     

     

     

     

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) under U.S. GAAP

     

     

     

    Cumulative translation adjustment - Yanacocha

    (40,867)

    (167,986)

    (80,110)

    Cumulative translation adjustment - Cerro Verde - restated (b)

    (1,748)

    (8,914)

    9,993

    Fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments

    (6,343)

    (1,040)

    -

    Other

    -

    912

    912

     

     

     

     

    Total accumulated other comprehensive loss under U.S. GAAP

    (48,958)

    (177,028)

    (69,205)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Basic and diluted income per share under U.S. GAAP

    1.52

    5.60

    7.41

    1. In 2002, Yanacocha restated its figures of prior years as a result of a reaudit requested by its Newmont Mining Corporation ("the Principal"). The principal changes were in connection with the useful lives of property, plant and equipment and mine development costs: in certain instances, Yanacocha was using different useful lives for similar assets and, in other cases, was depreciating mine facility assets using useful lives in excess of the estimated life of the gold reserves. The effects in Buenaventura were as follows: S/18,350,000 of increased retained earnings as of January 1, 2000, and additional expenses of S/7,864,000 and S/9,737,000 in 2000 and 2001, respectively.
    2. In addition, in 2002, the SEC challenged the accounting treatment for inventories followed by the Principal and Yanacocha, consisting of charging the depreciation directly to expenses and not allocating to inventories. Before issuing the 2002 financial statements, the SEC requested the Principal and Yanacocha to restate their prior financial statements. The effects in Buenaventura were as follows: S/14,726,000 of increased retained earnings as of January 1, 2000, and increased income of S/12,339,000 and S/7,968,000 in 2000 and 2001, respectively.

      In 2002, the Company considered these restatements when determining the share in Yanacocha under Peruvian GAAP; consequently, there is no difference in the accounting treatment between Peruvian GAAP and US GAAP as of December 31, 2002. The reconciliation of net income of 2000 and 2001, and shareholders' equity as of December 31, 2001 shows the amounts not recognized under Peruvian GAAP in and as of those years.

    3. (a) Represents the net effect of the U.S. GAAP adjustments on minority interest in the net income of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries.
    4. For general purposes,

      (b) As indicated in note 39 - Change in the following items are not taxablevaluation method of Cerro Verde's investment, the consolidated statements of income for the years 2003 and 2004 have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the accounting of the investment in Cerro Verde under current Peruvian tax regulations:

    - Fair value of derivative instruments: The loss (negative fair value) on derivative instruments entered into with investment banks is not deductible to the extent it is generated abroad (permanent item).

    - Share in Yanacocha's equity: The equity participation in affiliates, including dividends received, are not taxable. See note 32(b).method.

    The impairment of long-lived assets generates a temporary difference under current Peruvian tax regulations.

    The amounts shown in the net income reconciliation are presented before tax, except for the shareshares in Yanacocha.Yanacocha and Cerro Verde. The tax effect of each item, except the shareshares in Yanacocha and Cerro Verde, is included in the deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing line item.

     

    At December 31,

     

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

     

    Shareholders' equity according to the financial statements prepared under Peruvian GAAP

    1,699,649

    2,180,133

    Items increasing (decreasing) reported shareholders' equity

     

     

    Impairment of long-lived assets recorded under U.S. GAAP

    (33,931 )

    (33,931 )

    Depreciation originated by the impaired long-lived assets

    11,010

    11,719

    Impairment of long-lived assets recorded under Peruvian GAAP

    19,786

    19,786

    Amortization of goodwill of Consorcio Energético de Huancavelica S.A.

    1,842

    2,836

    Share in Yanacocha's - mining concession

    1,609

    3,484

    Cumulative translation adjustment - Yanacocha's mining concession

    (11,472 )

    (19,473 )

    Effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments on minority interest related to the impairment of long-lived assets

    547

    469

    Deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing assets

    1,117

    864

    Net adjustments

    (9,492)

    (14,246)

    Shareholders' equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    1,690,157

    2,165,887

     

    At December 31,

     

    2004

    2005

     

    S/.(000)

    S/.(000)

     

     

     

    Shareholders' equity according to the financial statements prepared under Peruvian GAAP

    2,180,133

    2,869,304

     

     

     

    Items increasing (decreasing) reported shareholders' equity

     

     

    Cumulative translation adjustment - Yanacocha's mining concession

    (19,473)

    (14,217)

    Cumulative translation adjustment - Cerro Verde's mining concession

    -

    10,628

    Share in Yanacocha's - mining concession

    3,484

    4,936

    Deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing assets

    864

    721

    Effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments on minority interest related to the impairment of long-lived assets

    469

    445

    Retroactive adjustments due to change in the valuation method for Cerro
    Verde's investment

    (190,711)

    -

    Other

    (2,426)

    (2,025)

     

     

     

    Net adjustments

    (207,793)

    488

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Shareholders' equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    1,972,340

    2,869,792

     

     

     

    As described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under Peruvian GAAP, the Company consolidated a 50% owned on Minera Poracota S.A. (hereafter "Poracota"). Under US GAAP, this investment should be accounted for under the equity method because the Company does not have voting control. The effect of not consolidating Poracota has no impact on net income or shareholder's equity. Had Poracota been consolidated, the most significant effects would have been as follows: development cost, net caption would have decreased in S/.12,263,000 and the minority interest liability would have decrease in S/.6,682,000.

    The following is a roll forward of the components of shareholders' equity under U.S. GAAP:

     

    S/.(000)

    Shareholder's equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP at December 31, 2003

    1,542,990

    Net income in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    192,879

    Declared and paid dividends

    (159,164)

    Change in fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments

    (8,085)

    Cumulative translation adjustment in Yanacocha

    (39,612)

    Cumulative translation adjustment in Cerro Verde - restated

    (1,808)

     

     

    Shareholders' equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP at December 31, 20022003

    1,508,8531,527,200

    Net income in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    179,035

    Declared and paid dividends

    (159,164)

    Unrealized gains, on investments

    209,130

    Loss from change in fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments

    (8,085 )

    Cumulative translation adjustment

    (39,612 )

    Shareholders' equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP at December 31, 2003

    1,690,157

    Net income in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    688,897712,674

    Declared and paid dividends

    (139,464)

    Unrealized gains on investmentsCumulative translation adjustment in Yanacocha

    47,201

    Amortization of deferred hedge loss

    682

    Change in fair value of derivative instruments classified as hedging instruments

    4,621(127,119)

    Cumulative translation adjustment in Cerro Verde - restated

    (127,119)(7,166)

    Other

    9126,215

    Shareholders' equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP at December 31, 2004

    2,165,8871,972,340

    Net income in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    942,669

    Declared and paid dividends

    (152,006)

    Cumulative translation adjustment in Yanacocha

    87,876

    Cumulative translation adjustment in Cerro Verde

    18,907

    Investments in shares maintained at fair value

    (48)

    Investments in shares acquired by subsidiary

    54

    Shareholders' equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP at December 31, 2005

    2,869,792

    With regard to the consolidated balance sheets and statements of income, the following captions determined under U.S. GAAP would have been:

     

    At December 31,

     

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

     

    Consolidated Balance Sheets

     

     

    Assets -

     

     

    Current portion of deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing, net

    38,040

    23,402

    Investments in shares

    1,433,406

    1,515,358

    Property, plant and equipment, net
    (including mining concessions)

    462,779

    601,133

    Goodwill, net

    9,034

    9,034

    Total current assets

     

     

    Non-current portion of deferred income tax and workers' profit sharing assets, net

    260,518

    222,761

    Total assets

    3,211,020

    3,556,680

    Liabilities -

     

     

    Total liabilities

    1,472,741

    1,324,915

    Minority interest

    47,882

    65,878

     

     

    For the years ended December 31,

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

     

     

    Consolidated Statements of Income

     

     

     

    Depreciation and amortization

    (40,407 )

    (46,409)

    (58,764 )

    Assets impairment loss and write-off

    -

    (4,691)

    -

    Total operating costs and expenses

    (573,187 )

    (627,091)

    (776,367 )

    Operating income

    84,870

    225,071

    329,800

    Share in affiliated companies, net

    318,758

    558,589

    577,733

    Loss on derivative instruments, net

    (289,880 )

    (668,030)

    (58,774 )

    Write-down of an available-for-sale investment to fair value

    (5,957)

    -

    -

    Income tax benefit (expense)

    (26,859 )

    199,151

    (102,230 )

    Effect of change in tax law

    -

    16,688

    -

    Other current and deferred taxes

    (26,859 )

    182,463

    (102,230 )

  • Additional disclosures required by U.S. GAAP and the SEC
  • The expense (benefit) for income tax and workers' profit sharing is as follows:

     

    For the years ended December 31,

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Expense (benefit) for income tax

     

     

     

    Current

    24,172

    38,509

    72,661

    Deferred

    2,687

    (237,660)

    29,569

    Total

    26,859

    (199,151)

    102,230

    Expense (benefit) for workers' profit sharing

     

     

     

    Current

    748

    2,298

    9,852

    Deferred

    865

    (65,436 )

    8,524

    Total

    1,613

    (63,138 )

    18,376

     

     

     

     

    Income tax and workers' profit sharing expense (benefit)

    28,472

    (262,289)

    120,606

    The tax effects of significant temporary differences are as follows:

     

     

    Debit (credit) to the consolidated statements of income

     

     

     

    Balance as of January 1st, 2004

    Income tax

    Workers' profit sharing

    Result from exposure to inflation

    Balance as of December 31, 2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    Deferred income from sale of future production

    252,746

    (18,149 )

    (5,253 )

    (11,766 )

    217,578

    Mine closing costs

    14,808

    2,873

    830

    (842 )

    17,669

    Stock Appreciation Rights

    17,142

    (3,428 )

    (994 )

    (798 )

    11,922

    Exploration expenses

    11,046

    582

    169

    (285 )

    11,512

    Impairment of property, plant and equipment

    7,398

    (300 )

    (50 )

    (344 )

    6,704

    Unrealized gain with affiliates

    4,837

    (352 )

    (102 )

    (224 )

    4,159

    Tax loss carryforward

    30,056

    (18,927 )

    (5,925 )

    (1,237 )

    3,967

    Slow moving and obsolescence supplies reserve

    4,089

    (692 )

    (201 )

    (105 )

    3,091

    Royalties payable to the Peruvian Government

    -

    1,927

    559

    -

    2,486

    Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable

    1,845

    21

    6

    (86 )

    1,786

    Allowance for labor contingencies

    -

    1,199

    348

    -

    1,547

    Other

    3,214

    325

    93

    (90 )

    3,542

     

    347,181

    (34,921 )

    (10,520 )

    (15,777 )

    285,963

    Less - Allowance for deferred asset recoverability

    (20,358 )

    4,641

    1,783

    1,195

    (12,739 )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    326,823

    (30,280 )

    (8,737 )

    (14,582 )

    273,224

    Deferred liability

     

     

     

     

     

    Mineral stripping costs

    (19,956 )

    -

    -

    -

    (19,956 )

    Other

    (8,309 )

    760

    217

    227

    (7,105 )

     

    (28,265 )

    760

    217

    227

    (27,061 )

     

    298,558

    (29,520 )

    (8,520 )

    (14,355 )

    246,163

    The reconciliation of the income tax and workers' profit sharing provision computed at the statutory Peruvian effective combined rate to the provision for income tax and workers' profit sharing recorded on an U.S. GAAP basis in the consolidated statements of income is as follows:

     

    For the years ended December 31,

     

    2002

    2003

    2004

     

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

    S/(000)

     

     

     

     

    Income before income tax according to U.S. GAAP

    93,811

    103,154

    819,376

    Workers' profit sharing expense (benefit) (a)

    1,613

    (63,137 )

    18,376

    Income tax and workers' profit sharing according to U.S. GAAP

    95,424

    40,017

    837,752

     

     

     

     

    Statutory effective combined rate

    32.84 %

    32.84 %

    35.60 %

    Expected income tax and workers' profit sharing provision in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    31,337

    13,142

    298,240

     

     

     

     

    Reconciliation items

     

     

     

    Share in affiliated companies (b)

    (104,680)

    (183,441)

    (205,673)

    Effect on fair value of derivative instruments

    109,895

    73,085

    20,923

    Effect of fair value of derivative contracts turned into normal sales recorded on shareholders' equity

    -

    (94,794 )

    -

    Change in valuation allowance

    (6,145 )

    (56,217 )

    -

    Effect of change in tax law

    -

    (22,064 )

    -

    Other permanent items

    (1,935 )

    8,000

    7,116

     

    (2,865 )

    (275,431)

    (177,634)

    Income tax and workers' profit sharing expense (benefit)

    28,472

    (262,289)

    120,606

    1. Under U.S. GAAP the workers' profit sharing provision is recorded as an operating expense (income).
    2. According to current Peruvian tax law, shares in affiliated companies are not taxable. See also note 32(b).

    40. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

    FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest EntitiesStock Based Compensation

    In January 2003, FASB issued FASB Interpretation N.46 ("FIN 46"), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which provides guidance on identification and reporting for entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights. FIN 46 defines such entities as variable interest entities ("VIEs"). A FASB Staff Position issued in October 2003 deferred the effective date of FIN 46 to the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2003 for entities created before February 1, 2003 if certain criteria are met. Subsequently, during December 2003,2004, the FASB issued FIN 46RSFAS No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment", which replacesrevised SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". SFAS No. 123R superseded APB Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and amends SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS No. 123R requires measurement and recording to the original interpretation. Applicationfinancial statements of this revised interpretationthe costs of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award, recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in financial statementsexchange for companies that have interests in VIEs or potential VIEs commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Applicationsuch award. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective application. Accordingly, compensation expense will be recognized for all other typesnewly granted awards and awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006. Additionally, SFAS No. 123R requires the benefits of entities istax deductions different from recognized compensation expense to be rep orted as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. The Company currently applies the intrinsinc value method in financial statementsaccordance with Accounting Board Opinion No.25 - "Accounting for periods ending after March 15, 2004. Based on a referral fromStock Issued to Employees" and related interpretation in accounting for stock options. Accordingly, because stock option exercise prices equal the EITF, the board agreed to add to its agenda a project to provide guidancemarket value on the variability to be considered when determining whether an interestdate of the grant, no compensation cost is a variable interest in a potential variable interest entity. FIN 46currently recognize for stock option grants. The adoption of SFAS 123R did not have anya material impact on the Company'sour financial position, or results of operations at December 31, 2004, or for the year then ended.cash flows.

    At theDeferred Stripping Costs

    In March 30, 2005, meeting, the FASB unanimously ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-06, "Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the consensus reached atMining Industry," (EITF 04-6) which addresses the March 17, 2003 EITF meeting thataccounting for stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine areand refers to these costs as variable production costs that should be included in the costs of the inventory produced during the period that thestripping costs are incurred. The EITF reached a consensus that post-production stripping costs are a component of mineral inventory cost subject to the provisions of AICPA Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43,Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing" (ARB 43). In the mining industry, the costs of removing overburden and waste materials to access mineral deposits are referred to as "stripping costs." It is the accounting for costs incurred during the production stage of the mine, or the post-production stripping costs, that are addressed in Issue 04-6. Based upon this consensus, post-production stripping costs should be co nsidered costs of the extracted minerals under a full absorption costing system and recognized as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs ofapplicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of the inventory. Additionally,As a result, capitalization of suchstripping costs would beis appropriate only to the extent product inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. This consensus may represent a significant change in practice for those companies that currently expense post-production stripping costs as incurred or capitalize post-production stripping costs and amortize those deferred costs over the life of the mine or another determinative period. The guidance in this consensusEITF 04-6 is effective for financial statements issued forthe first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early2005. Early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, an entity should recognizeis permitted by this standard, the guidance may be applied either by the recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment in the period of initially applying this consensus consistent with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20,Accounting Changes. However , pro forma information will not be required upon adoption. Alternatively, companies are not prohibited fromadoption or by restating prior period financial statements issued. Entities that elect to early adopt the guidancestatement. As explained in 3(b), El Brocal adopted this consensus during an interim period, must report the effects of this change in interim financial statements in accordance with the provisions ofFASB Statement No. 3,Reporting Accounting changes in Interim Financial Statements. The company is evaluating the impact of this standard, on the Company's financial position or results from operation.standard.

    Asset Retirement Obligations

    In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation N.4747 ("FIN 47"), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB StatementNo. 143. FIN 47 clarifies that the term "conditional asset retirement obligation" as used in SFAS No. 143 Asset Retirement obligations, which was issued in June 2001. The FASB issued the Interpretationrefers to address diverse accounting practices that have developed with regarda legal obligation to the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with theperform an asset retirement of a tangible long-lived assetactivity in which the timing and (or)and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. AccordingThe obligation to perform the Interpretation,asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or)and/or method of settlement of a condition asset retirement obligations should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. settlement.

    FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient informationrequires a liability to reasonably estimatebe recognized for the fair value of ana conditional asset retirement obligation.obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 was effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Companyadoption of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

    Accounting Changes and Error Corrections

    In May 2005 the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections". SFAS No. 154 established new standards on accounting for changes in accounting principles. SFAS No. 154 requires all such changes to be accounted for by retrospective application to the financial statements of prior periods unless otherwise specified by the literature, unless it is evaluating theimpracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Adoption of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material impact of this standard, on the Company's financial position, results of operations or results from operati on.cash flows.

    Recent DevelopmentsInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

    On March 15, 2005,As indicates in the note 2(v) to the consolidated financial statements through Resolution No 038-2005-EF/93.01 of February 3, 2006, the Peruvian Accounting Standards Board (CNC in Spanish), approved to suspend until December 31, 2006, the mandatory application of the IAS 21 "Effect of the Variations in the Exchange Rates of Foreign Currencies" (revised in 2003), related to the identification and use of a functional currency. Although, the Peruvian securities regulatory authority (CONASEV) has determined that Peruvian Public Companies should apply this IAS 21 starting 2006, and not delay application until 2007 as would be permitted by the CNC. As part of this upcoming IAS 21 adoption, the Company executed a joint venture agreement with Río Narcea Gold Mines, S.A., Naraval Gold S.R.L. and Río Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (collectively "Grupo RN") wherebyis revaluating the Company will acquire a 51 percent equity interest in the Santa Marina exploration project, which is located 2 kilometers north of the El Valle mine on the Río Narcea gold belt in Asturias, Spain, throughfunctional currency that has to use to prepare its 100 percent subsidiary Minera Santa Marina del Norte S.L. ("Santa Marina"). The Santa Marina project is operated by Santa Marina. The Company has agreed, pursuant to the joint venture agreement, to invest 2,200,000 Euros by March 15, 2007 to develop the Santa Marina project. Upon such investment, Grupo RN will transfer certain mining rights with respect to the Santa Marina exploration project in exchange for a 49 percent interest in Santa Marina. In addition, upon receipt of notice by Grupo RN affirming the completion of the Company's initial investment, the Company has a th ree month option to increase their equity interest in Santa Marina to 70 percent for an additional investment of 2,400,000 Euros over a two year period from such exercise.

    On March 16, 2005, the Company, the Sumitomo Group, Phelps Dodge Corporation, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Cyprus Metals Company, Cyprus Climax Metals Company and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. ("Cerro Verde") entered into an agreement whereby, subject to certain closing conditions, the Company agreed to increase its ownership interest in Cerro Verde up to 20 percent and the Sumitomo Group agreed to acquire an ownership interest in Cerro Verde of between 21 and 25 percent in connection with a US$850 million expansion of the Cerro Verde copper operations to mine a primary sulfide ore body. Phelps Dodge will retain a majority interest in Cerro Verde. Cerro Verde intends to effect the increase of the Company's and the Sumitomo Group's ownership interests pursuant to a capital increase.consolidated financial statements.

    MINERA YANACOCHA S.R.L.

    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    DECEMBER 31, 20042005 AND 20032004

    CONTENTSPage

    Report of the independent registeredIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-67

    Balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 F-68F-52

    Statements of income for each of the three years ended December 31, 2005 F-53

    Balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 F-69F-54

    Statements of cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2005 F-55

    Statements of changes in partners' equity for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004 F-70

    Statements of cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004 F-712005 F-56

    Notes to the financial statements F-72F-57

    PricewaterhouseCoopersDongo-Soria Gaveglio y Asociados

    Sociedad Civil

    Firma Miembro de PricewaterhouseCoopers

    REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    February 7, 20056, 2006

    To the Partners and the Executive Committee of
    Minera Yanacocha S.R.L.

    In our opinion, the accompanying balance sheets and the related statements of income, of changes in partners' equity and of cash flows, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position ofMinera Yanacocha S.R.L. at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20042005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statementsstat ements includes exami ning,examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in Peru. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of net income for the three years in the period ended December 31, 20042005 and the determination of partners' equity and financial position at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 to the extent summarized in Note 17 to the financial statements.

    As explained in Note 2 to the financial statements, as of January 1, 2003 the Company changed the method to determine its remediation and retirement liability. The resulting cumulative effect of this change amounting to approximately $32.4 million was charged to income of year 2003.

    /S/ DONGO-SORIA GAVEGLIO Y ASOCIADOS

    Countersigned byby:

    /S/ LUIS W MONTERO___(partner)W. MONTERO

    Luis W. Montero

    (partner)
    Peruvian Public Accountant


    Registration No.17729

    MINERA YANACOCHA S.R.L.STATEMENTS OF INCOME

    Year ended December 31,

    2005

    2004

    2003

    (in thousands of US dollars)

    Revenues

    $ 1,490,402

    $ 1,249,882

    $ 1,036,370

    Costs and expenses

    Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)

    507,806

    450,825

    377,214

    Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    193,587

    179,441

    146,822

    Exploration, research and development

    32,884

    35,236

    13,574

    General and administrative

    5,453

    4,986

    5,126

    Environmental, litigation and other costs, net

    (6,669 )

    6,135

    18,126

    733,061

    676,623

    560,862

    Other income (expense)

    Interest and other income

    4,774

    860

    1,560

    Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of
    US$2,016, US$4,559 and US$3,035, respectively

    (1,234 )

    (2,252 )

    (2,615 )

    3,540

    (1,392 )

    (1,055 )

    Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
    a change in accounting principle

    760,881

    571,867

    474,453

    Income tax expense (Note 12)

    (235,407 )

    (181,563 )

    (121,688 )

    Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

    525,474

    390,304

    352,765

    Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle,
    net of tax of US$10.2 million in 2003 (Note 9)

    -

    -

    (32,353 )

    Net income

    $ 525,474

    $ 390,304

    320,412

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    BALANCE SHEETS

    At December 31,

    2004

    2003

    At December 31,

    (in thousands of US dollars)

    2005

    2004

     

     

    (in thousands of US dollars)

    ASSETS

     

     

    Cash and cash equivalents

    $ 69,798

    $ 46,391

    $ 295,511

    $ 69,798

    Restricted funds

    -

    16,672

    Receivables (Note 3)

    34,659

    35,680

    Restricted cash

    1,978

    -

    Accounts receivable (Note 3)

    40,026

    34,659

    Due from related parties (Note 13)

    365

    -

    Inventories (Note 4)

    48,404

    46,985

    67,958

    48,404

    Ore on leach pads (Note 5)

    88,447

    132,031

    65,875

    88,447

    Current assets

    241,308

    277,759

    471,713

    241,308

    Property, plant and mine development, net (Note 6)

    882,946

    794,527

    Long-term ore on leach pads (Note 5)

    73,496

    69,045

    Long-term stockpiles (Note 5)

    6,925

    3,258

    Plant and mine development, net (Note 6)

    943,263

    882,946

    Long-term stockpiles and ore on leach pads (Note 5)

    129,189

    80,421

    Other long-term assets

    3,073

    1,452

    5,418

    3,073

    Total assets

    $ 1,207,748

    $ 1,146,041

    $ 1,549,583

    $ 1,207,748

    LIABILITIES

     

     

    Current portion of long-term debt (Note 10)

    $ 16,156

    $ 30,012

    $ 3,160

    $ 16,156

    Accounts payable

    24,779

    25,983

    27,693

    24,760

    Accrued liabilities (Note 7)

    36,556

    22,192

    Related parties (Note 13)

    18,809

    10,097

    Due to related parties (Note 13)

    20,875

    19,568

    Workers' profit sharing (Note 8)

    28,447

    23,158

    39,904

    28,447

    Income taxes payable

    46,283

    91,812

    55,181

    46,283

    Current portion of reclamation and remediation liabilities (Note 9)

    4,312

    6,105

    Current portion of deferred workers' profit sharing (Note 8)

    2,825

    2,825

    Current portion of deferred income tax liabilities (Note 12)

    1,041

    16,852

    Deferred revenue

    105

    531

    Deferred workers' profit sharing (Note 8)

    113

    2,825

    Other current liabilities (Note 7)

    48,366

    41,274

    Current liabilities

    179,313

    229,567

    195,292

    179,313

    Long-term debt (Note 10)

    21,160

    37,344

    -

    21,160

    Reclamation and remediation liabilities (Note 9)

    102,719

    85,643

    112,942

    102,719

    Deferred workers' profit sharing (Note 8)

    18,381

    20,813

    17,207

    18,381

    Deferred income tax liabilities (Note 12)

    69,683

    71,804

    61,282

    69,683

    Other long term liabilities

    5,318

    -

    Other long-term liabilities

    6,212

    5,318

    Total liabilities

    396,574

    445,171

    392,935

    396,574

    Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16)

     

     

    Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)

    PARTNERS' EQUITY (Note 11)

     

     

    Partners' contributions

    208,616

    208,616

    208,616

    Additional contributions

    226

    226

    226

    Restricted earnings

    189,600

    189,600

    189,600

    Retained earnings

    412,732

    302,428

    758,206

    412,732

    Total partners' equity

    811,174

    700,870

    1,156,648

    811,174

    Total liabilities and partners' equity

    $ 1,207,748

    $ 1,146,041

    $ 1,549,583

    $ 1,207,748

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    MINERA YANACOCHA S.R.L.

    STATEMENTS OF INCOME

     

    Year ended December 31,

     

    2004

    2003

    2002

     

    (in thousands of US dollars)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Revenues

    $ 1,249,882

    $ 1,036,370

    $ 713,398

     

     

     

     

    Costs and expenses

     

     

     

    Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation,

     

     

     

    depletion and amortization shown separately below)

    450,825

    377,214

    312,980

    Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    179,441

    146,822

    114,769

    Exploration, research and development

    35,236

    13,574

    11,121

    General and administrative

    4,986

    5,126

    4,682

    Other

    6,135

    18,126

    (160)

     

    676,623

    560,862

    443,392

    Other income (expense)

     

     

     

    Interest and other income

    860

    1,560

    1,415

    Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of

       

    $2,016, $4,559 and $3,035, respectively

    (2,252)

    (2,615)

    (8,888)

     

    (1,392)

    (1,055)

    (7,473)

     

     

     

     

    Income before taxes and cumulative effect of

     

     

     

    a change in accounting principle

    571,867

    474,453

    262,533

     

     

     

     

    Income tax expense (Note 12)

    (181,563)

    (121,688)

    (64,611)

     

     

     

     

    Income before cumulative effect of a change

     

     

     

    in accounting principle

    390,304

    352,765

    197,922

     

     

     

     

    Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,

     

     

     

    net of tax of $10.2 million in 2003

    -

    (32,353)

    -

     

     

     

     

    Net income

    $ 390,304

    $ 320,412

    $ 197,922

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

    MINERA YANACOCHA S.R.L.

    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' EQUITY

     

    Partners'

    Contributions

    Additional

    Contributions

    Restricted

    Earnings

    Retained

    Earnings

    Total

     

     

    (in thousands of US dollars)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Balances at January 1, 2002

    $ 208,616

    $ 226

    $ 80,000

    $ 244,386

    $ 533,228

    Appropriation of retained earnings

    -

    -

    80,000

    (80,000)

    -

    Distributions of profits to the partners

    -

    -

    -

    (50,692)

    (50,692)

    Net income

    -

    -

    -

    197,922

    197,922

    Balances at December 31, 2002

    208,616

    226

    160,000

    311,616

    680,458

    Appropriation of retained earnings

    -

    -

    29,600

    (29,600)

    -

    Distributions of profits to the partners

    -

    -

    -

    (300,000)

    (300,000)

    Net income

    -

    -

    -

    320,412

    320,412

    Balances at December 31, 2003

    208,616

    226

    189,600

    302,428

    700,870

    Distributions of profits to the partners

    -

    -

    -

    (280,000)

    (280,000)

    Net income

    -

    -

    -

    390,304

    390,304

    Balances at December 31, 2004

    $ 208,616

    $ 226

    $ 189,600

    $ 412,732

    $ 811,174

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

    MINERA YANACOCHA S.R.L.

    STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

    Year ended December 31,

    2004

    2003

    2002

    Year ended December 31,

    (in thousands of US dollars)

    2005

    2004

    2003

     

     

     

    (in thousands of US dollars)

    Operating activities:

     

     

     

    Net income

    $ 390,304

    $ 320,412

    $ 197,922

    $ 525,474

    $ #9; 390,304

    $ 320,412

    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

     

     

     

    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities

    Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    179,441

    146,822

    114,769

    193,587

    179,441

    146,822

    Deferred income taxes

    (17,932)

    (26,504)

    13,089

    (9,053)

    (17,932)

    (26,504)

    Deferred profit sharing

    (2,433)

    (5,189)

    (773)

    (3,886)

    (2,433)

    (5,189)

    Accretion of reclamation obligations

    6,025

    6,534

    -

    7,059

    6,025

    6,534

    Revision in reclamation estimate

    (2,351)

    16,615

    -

    Write-off of material and supplies

    -

    3,165

    667

    Write-off of property, plant and mine development

    6,610

    3,462

    -

    Revision in reclamation estimate, net

    (10,766)

    (2,351)

    16,615

    Write-down of material and supplies inventories

    -

    -

    3,165

    Write-down of property, plant and mine development

    674

    6,160

    3,462

    Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net

    -

    32,353

    -

    -

    -

    32,353

    Other

    -

    -

    838

    (Increase) decrease in operating assets:

     

     

     

    Inventories, ore on leach pads and stockpiles

    14,212

    (25,938)

    (42,586)

    (45,398)

    14,212

    (25,938)

    Other assets

    (601)

    (954)

    9,368

    (8,079)

    (601)

    (954)

    Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:

     

     

     

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    (19,286)

    88,576

    23,595

    24,803

    (19,286)

    88,576

    Reclamation liabilities

    (5,386)

    (5,700)

    3,032

    (6,721)

    (5,386)

    (5,700)

    Net cash provided by operating activities

    548,153

    553,654

    319,921

    Net cash provided from operating activities

    667,694

    548,153

    553,654

    Investing activities:

     

     

     

    Additions to property, plant and mine development

    (231,378)

    (205,682)

    (146,691)

    (225,846)

    (231,378)

    (205,682)

    Net cash used in investing activities

    (231,378)

    (205,682)

    (146,691)

    (225,846)

    (231,378)

    (205,682)

    Financing activities:

     

     

     

    Proceeds from debt

    65,500

    -

    28,850

    -

    65,500

    -

    Repayments of debt

    (95,540)

    (47,598)

    (111,853)

    (34,157)

    (95,540)

    (47,598)

    Restricted funds

    16,672

    (824)

    (3,160)

    Change in restricted cash

    (1,978)

    16,672

    (824)

    Distributions of profits to the partners

    (280,000)

    (300,000)

    (50,692)

    (180,000)

    (280,000)

    (300,000)

    Net cash used in financing activities

    (293,368)

    (348,422)

    (136,855)

    (216,135)

    (293,368)

    (348,422)

    Net change in cash and cash equivalents

    23,407

    (450)

    36,375

    225,713

    23,407

    (450)

    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

    46,391

    46,841

    10,466

    Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

    $ 69,798

    $ 46,391

    $ 46,841

    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year

    69,798

    46,391

    46,841

    Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year

    $ 295,511

    $ 69,798

    $ 46,391

     

     

     

    See Note 14 for supplemental cash flow information.

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' EQUITY

    Partners'
    contributions

    Additional
    contributions

    Restricted earnings

    Retained earnings

    Total

    (in thousands of US dollars)

    Balance at January 1, 2003

    $ 208,616

    $ 226

    $ 160,000

    $ 311,616

    $ 680,458

    Appropriation of retained earnings

    -

    -

    29,600

    (29,600)

    _

    Distributions of profits to the partners

    -

    -

    -

    (300,000)

    (300,000)

    Net income

    -

    -

    -

    320,412

    320,412

    Balance at December 31, 2003

    208,616

    226

    189,600

    302,428

    700,870

    Distributions of profits to the partners

    -

    -

    -

    (280,000)

    (280,000)

    Net income

    -

    -

    -

    390,304

    390,304

    Balance at December 31,2004

    208,616

    226

    189,600

    412,732

    811,174

    Distributions of profits to the partners

    -

    -

    -

    (180,000)

    (180,000)

    Net income

    -

    -

    -

    525,474

    525,474

    Balance at December 31,2005

    $ 208,616

    $ 226

    $ 189,600

    $ 758,206

    $ 1,156,648

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    MINERA YANACOCHA S.R.L.

    NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


    DECEMBER 31, 20042005 AND 20032004

    1. BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
    2. Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (the "Company"), formerly Minera Yanacocha S.A., was incorporated in Peru on January 14, 1992 and began its operations in 1993. The Company is engaged in the exploration and production of gold under the mining concessions it owns or that are owned by S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca ("Chaupiloma").

      The Company is owned 51.35% by Newmont Second Capital Corporation, a 100% indirectly owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont"), 43.65% owned by Cia. Minera Condesa S.A., which is 100% owned by Cia. de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. ("Buenaventura") and 5% owned by the International Finance Corporation.

      The majority partners of the Company (or their affiliates) also own the majority interest in Chaupiloma. In accordance with a mining lease, amended effective January 1, 1994, the Company pays Chaupiloma a 3% royalty based on quarterly production sold at current market prices, after deducting refinery and transportation costs. The royalty agreement expires in 2012, whichbut can be extended at the Company's option.

      Located in the Cajamarca province of Peru, the Company's operation consists of five separate open pit mines: the Carachugo, San José, Maqui Maqui, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua mines. Reclamation and/or backfilling activities in the mining areas of Carachugo, San José and Maqui Maqui are currently underway. Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua are still active pits. Gold-bearing ores are transported to one of four leach pads for gold recovery using conventional heap-leaching cyanidation, followed by Merrill-Crowe zinc precipitation and smelting where a final doréore product is poured. The doréore is then shipped offsite for refining and is sold in worldwide gold markets.

      Proven and probable reserves contained approximately 32.332.6 million (unaudited) and 31.732.3 million (unaudited) ounces of gold at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively and 2003, respectively3.2 billion (unaudited) and 2.2 billion (unaudited) pounds of copper at December 31, 2004.2005 and 2004, respectively.

      During 2004, the MinasThe Conga project which currently consists of two gold-copper porphyry deposits located northeast of the Minera Yanacocha operating area in the provinces of Celendin, Cajamarca and Hualgayco was added to reserves. This developmentHualgayco. The Conga project addedhas proven and probable reserves of 11.8 million (unaudited) ounces of gold and 3.2 billion (unaudited) pounds of copper at December 31, 2005 and 8.7 million (unaudited) million ounces of gold and 2.2 billion (unaudited) pounds of copper to reserves.

      Theat December 31, 2004, and is included in the total Company has reassessed the challenges involved in obtaining required permits for Cerro Quilish primarily related to increased community concerns. Based upon this reassessment, the Company has reclassified 3.9 million (unaudited) ounces of gold fromproven and provable reserves to non-reserve mineralization as discussed in Note 16.described above.

      During 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, the Company sold 3.33 million, 3.04 million 2.86 million and 2.292.86 million ounces of gold, respectively.

      Gold mining requires the use of specialized facilities and technology. The Company relies heavily on such facilities and technology to maintain production levels. Also, the cash flow and profitability of the Company's operations are significantly affected by the market price of gold. Gold prices can fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control.

      In the fourth quarter of 2000, two of the Company's partners unitized their holdings in northern Peru into the Company. Under the unitization plan, the Company spent $45.7 million for mining claims, land, and a lime plant. The agreements signed to formalize the unitization contain certain commitments described in Note 16.

    3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
    4. Use of Estimates

      The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the Company's financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to mineral reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates and units-of-production depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations; environmental, reclamation and closure obligations; estimates of recoverable gold and other minerals in stockpile and leach pad inventories; asset impairments; write-downs of inventory to net realizable value; employee benefit liabilities; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets; reserves for continge nciescontingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on the Company's historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

      Currency

      The accompanying financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars, the Company's functional currency, since almost allmost of its transactions are traded, collected and paid in such currency. All amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand ($000) unless otherwise stated. Transactions in other currencies are recorded in United StatesU.S. dollars based on exchange rates prevailing at the time of such transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies are translated into the United StatesU.S. dollar at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates, and any resulting gains or losses are reflected in current earnings.

      Cash and Cash Equivalents

      Cash and cash equivalents consist of all cash balances and deposits in banks.banks with an original maturity of three months or less. Because of the short maturity of these balances, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value.

      Stockpiles, Ore on Leach Pads and Inventories

      As described below, costs that are incurred in, or benefit, the productive process are accumulated as stockpiles, ore on leach pads stockpiles and inventories. Stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories are carried at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on prevailing and long-term metals prices, less the estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. Write-downs of stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories resulting from net realizable value impairments are reported as a component ofCosts applicable to sales.sales. The current portion of stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories is determined based on the expected amounts to be processed within the next twelve months. Stockpiles, ore on leach pads and inventories not expected to be processed within the next twelve months are classified as long-term. The major classifications are as follows:

      Stockpiles

      Stockpiles represent coarse ore that has been extracted from a minemined and is available for further processing. Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tons added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained units such as contained ounces or pounds (based on assay data) and the estimated metallurgical recovery percentagerates (based on the expected processing method). Stockpile ore tonnages are verified by periodic surveys. Costs are allocated to a stockpile based on relative values of material stockpiled and processed using current mining costs incurred up to the point of stockpiling the ore, including applicable overhead, depreciation, depletion and amortization relating to mining operations, and removed at each stockpile's average cost per recoverable unit.

      Ore on Leach Pads

      The recovery of gold from certain oxide ores is efficiently achieved through the heap leaching process.leaching. Under this method, ore is placed on leach pads where it is permeatedtreated with a chemical solution, which dissolves the gold contained in the ore. The resulting "pregnant" solution which is included as in-process inventory, isfurther processed further in the processinga plant where the gold is recovered. For accounting purposes, costs are added to ore on leach pads based on current mining costs, including applicable depreciation, depletion and amortization relating to mining operations. CostCosts are removed from theore on leach padpads as ounces are recovered in circuit at the leach plant based on the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad.

      The engineering estimates of recoverable gold on the leach pads are calculated from the quantities of ore placed on the pads (measured tons added to the leach pads), the grade of ore placed on the leach pads (based on assay data) and a recovery percentage (based on the leach process and ore type). In general, the leach pad production cycles project recoveries ofpads recover approximately 90% to 95% of the placedultimate recoverable ounces in the first year of leaching, declining each year thereafter until the leaching process is complete.

      Although the quantities of recoverable gold placed on the leach pads are reconciled by comparing the grades of ore placed on the pads to the quantities of gold actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing process is constantly monitored and the engineering estimates are refined based on actual results over time. Historically, the Company's operating results have not been materially impacted by variations between the estimated and actual recoverable quantities of gold on its leach pads. At December 31, 2004,2005, the weighted-average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on leach pads was $151US$140 per ounce.ounce (unaudited). Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis.

      The ultimate recovery of gold from a leach pad will n otnot be known until the leaching process is concluded. Based on current mine plans excluding any Conga production, the Company expects to place the last ton of ore on its leach pads in 2014. Including the estimated time required for residual leaching, rinsing and reclamation activities, the Company expects that its leaching operations will terminate within approximately tensix years following the date that the last ton of ore is placed on the leach pad.

      The current portion of leach pads is determined based on engineering estimates of the quantities of gold at the balance sheet date that areis expected to be recovered during the next twelve months.

      In-process Inventory

      In-process inventories represent materials that are currently in the process of being converted to a saleable product. The Company's conversion process is leach in-circuit. In-process material is measured based on assays of the material fed tointo the process and the projected recoveries of the respective plants. In-process inventories are valued at the average cost of the material fed tointo the process attributable to the source material coming from the mines, stockpiles and/or leach pads plus the in-process conversion costs, including applicable depreciation relating to the process facilities incurred to that point in the process.

      Precious Metals Inventory

      Precious metals inventories include gold doreore and/or gold bullion. Precious metals that result from the Company's mining and processing activities are valued at the average cost of the respective in-process inventory incurred prior to the refining process, plus applicable refining costs.

      Materials and Supplies

      Materials and supplies are valued at the lower of weighted-average cost or net realizable value. Cost includes applicable taxes and freight.

      Property, Plant and Mine Development

      Expenditures for new facilities or equipment or expenditures that extend the useful lives of existing facilities or equipment are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method at rates sufficient to depreciate such costs over the estimated productive lives of such facilities, which do not exceed the related estimated mine lives, of such facilities based on proven and probable reserves.

      Mineral exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, costs incurred prospectively to develop suchthe property are capitalized as incurred and are amortized using the units-of-production ("UOP") method over the estimated life of the ore body based on the estimated recoverable ounces mined from proven and probable reserves. These costs include costs to further delineate the ore body and remove overburden to initially expose the ore body.

      Major development costs incurred after the commencement of production are amortized using the UOP method based on estimated recoverable ounces mined from proven and probable reserves. To the extent that these costs benefit the entire ore body, they are amortized over the estimated life of the ore body.

      Ongoing development expenditures to maintain production are charged to operations as incurred. Repair and maintenance costs incurred in connection with major maintenance activities are charged to operations as incurred.

      Interest expense allocable to the costs of developing mining properties and to constructing new facilities is capitalized until assets are ready for their intended use.

      Mineral interests

      Mineral interests are recorded at fair value at the time acquired,of acquisition, in Property, plant and mine development, and represent mineral use rights regardless of whether the Company owns the related surface rights ("mining concessions"). The Company's mineral assets represent mineral use rights related to production, development or exploration stage properties, and the value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineral interests believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. Production stage mineral interests represent interests in operating properties that contain proven and probable reserves. Development stage mineral interests represent interests in properties under development that contain proven and probable reserves. Exploration stage mineral interests represent interests in properties that are believed to potentially contain (i) other mineralized material such as inferred material within pits; measured, indicated and inferred mater ialinferre d material with insufficient drill spacing to qualify as proven and probable reserves; and inferred material in close proximity to proven and probable reserves; (ii) around-mine exploration potential such as inferred material not immediately adjacent to existing reserves and mineralization but located within the immediate mine infrastructure; (iii) other mine-related exploration potential that is not part of measured, indicated or inferred material and is comprised mainly of material outside of the immediate mine area; or (iv) greenfields exploration potential that is not associated with any other production, development or exploration stage property, as described above. The Company's mining concessions are enforceable regardless of whether proven and probable reserves have been established. In addition, these mining concessions provide for both the right to explore and exploit. However, the Company must first obtain the respective exploration and exploitation permits, which are generally grantedgran ted in due course. The Company may retain mining concessions indefinitely by paying annual fees and, during exploitation, complying with production obligations or paying assessed fines. Mining concessions are freely assignable or transferable.

      Asset Impairment

      The Company reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the asset. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows. Future cash flows are estimated based on quantities of recoverable minerals, expected gold and other commodity prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), production levels and cash costs of production and capital, all based on life-of-mine plans. The term "recoverable minerals" refers to the estimated amount of gold and other minerals that will be obtained from proven and probable reserves and all related exploration stage mineral interests after taking into account losses during ore processing and treatment. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset groups. All assets at an operating segment are considered together for purposes of estimating future cash flows. Assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are subject to risks and uncertainties.

      Revenue Recognition

      Revenue is recognized when the price is determinable, the product has been delivered, and transfer ofthe title has been transferred to the customer and collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. Revenues from silver sales are credited to CostsCosts applicable to sales as a by-product credit.

      Reclamation and Remediation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)

      In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", which established a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. The statement was adopted on January 1, 2003, when the Company recorded the estimated present value of reclamation liabilities and increased the carrying amount of the related asset which resulted in a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $32.4US$32.4 million, net of $10.2US$10.2 million in taxes (see Note 9). Reclamation costs are allocated to expense over the life of the related assets and are adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate.

      Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 143, estimated future reclamation costs were based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Such costs related to active mines wereare accrued and charged over the expected operating lives of the mines using the UOP method based on proven and probable reserves. Future remediation costs for inactive mines were accrued based on management's best estimate at the end of each period of the undiscounted costs expected to be incurred at a site. Such cost estimates included, where applicable, ongoing care, maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates were reflected in earnings in the period an estimate was revised.

      Income Tax and Profit Sharing

      The Company accounts for income tax and legally required profit sharing using the liability method, recognizing certain temporary differences between the financial reporting basis of the Company's liabilities and assets and the related income tax basis for such liabilities and assets. This method generates a net deferred income tax liability and profit sharing liability or net deferred income tax asset and profit sharing asset for the Company, as of the end of the year, as measured by the statutory tax and profit sharing rates in effect as enacted. The Company derives its deferred income tax charge or benefit and profit sharing charge or benefit by recording the change in the net deferred income tax liability and profit sharing liability or net deferred income tax asset and profit sharing asset balance for the year, based on Peruvian income tax and profit sharing rates.

      The Company's deferred income tax assets include certain future tax benefits. The Company records a valuation allowance against any portion of those deferred income tax assets when it believes, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized.

      RecentRecently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

      Stock Based Compensation

      In NovemberDecember 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151 "Inventory Cost-an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4"123R, "Share-Based Payment", which clarifiesrevised SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". SFAS No. 123R superseded APB Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and amends SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS No. 123R requires measurement and recording to the financial statements of the costs of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award, recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for such award. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective application. Accordingly, compensation expense will be recognized for all newly granted awards and awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006. Compensation cost for the unvested portion of awards that are outstanding as of January 1, 2006, b ased on the fair value at date of grant as calculated for our pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, will be recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period. Additionally, SFAS No. 123R requires the benefits of tax deductions different from recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. At present, compensation cost of approximately US$1.4 million is expected to be required through charges from the partners.

      Deferred Stripping Costs

      In March 2005, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-06, "Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry," (EITF 04-6) which addresses the accounting for abnormal amountsstripping costs incurred during the production phase of idle facility expenses, freight, handlinga mine and refers to these costs and wasted material as currentvariable production costs that should be included as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs applicable to sales in the same period costs. It also requires that allocationsas the revenue from the sale of fixed production overheadsinventory. As a result, capitalization of stripping costs is appropriate only to the extent product inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. EITF 04-6 is effective for the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, and will be adopted by the Company on January 1, 2006, as required. The estimated impact of adoption is a reduction ofProperty, plant and mine development, net of approximately US$11.3 million, an increase to oreo n leach pads of approximately US$1.4 million, a decrease of deferred income taxes of US$3.2 million, a decrease inDeferred workers' profit sharing of approximately US$1.0 million and a reduction inRetained earnings of approximately US$5.7 million. Future stripping costs will be recognized as a component of conversioninventory to be basedrecognized inCosts applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory. Adoption of EITF 04-6 will have no impact on the normal capacityCompany's cash position.

      Asset Retirement Obligations

      In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation 47 ("FIN 47"), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB No. 143. FIN 47 clarifies that the term "conditional asset retirement obligation" as used in SFAS No. 143 refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the production facilities.entity. The Statement appliesobligation to inventory costs incurred inperform the firstasset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. FIN 47 requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 was effective for fiscal year beginningyears ending after JuneDecember 15, 2005. The Company hasadoption of FIN 47 did not determinedhave a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or c ash flows.

      Accounting Changes and Error Corrections

      In May 2005 the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections". SFAS No. 154 established new standards on accounting for changes in accounting principles. SFAS No. 154 requires all such changes to be accounted for by retrospective application to the financial statements of prior periods unless otherwise specified by the literature, or it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Adoption of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material impact if any, on the Company's financial position, results of operations or results from operations.cash flows.

      A committee of the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") discussed the accounting for deferred stripping costs incurred during production but did not reach a consensus in 2004. The Task Force considered the recommendation that stripping costs incurred during production are a mine development cost that should be capitalized as an investment in the mine and attributed to the proven and probable reserves benefited in a systematic and rational manner. However, the Task Force directed the FASB staff to develop additional guidance about what constitutes a systematic and rational manner of attributing the capitalized costs to proven and probable reserves benefited. The Company cannot predict whether the deliberations of the EITF will ultimately modify or otherwise result in new accounting standards or interpretations thereof that differ from the Company's current practices.

      Reclassifications

      Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to 20042005 presentations. These reclassifications had no material effect on previously reported presentations of assets and liabilities, net income, cash flows or shareholders'partners' equity.

    5. RECEIVABLESACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
    6. At December 31,

      2004

      2003

      Value added tax credit

      $ 16,958

      $ 14,845

      Claims for tax refunds

      9,449

      17,157

      Other

      8,252

      3,678

      $ 34,659

      $ 35,680

       

      At December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      Value added tax credit

      $ 16,530

      $ 16,958

      Prepayments to suppliers and contractors

      7,364

      2,292

      Claims for tax refunds

      6,876

      9,449

      Employees

      1,784

      -

      Other

      7,472

      5,960

       

      $ 40,026

      $ 34,659

      During 20042005 the Company finalizedprovided cash advances to certain local suppliers and made prepayments for critical consumables such as tires and cyanide. During 2005 the Company received a numbertax refund of prior year tax assessments withUS$2.5 million related to its former contract miner, which arose out of a Superintendencia Nacional de Administracion Tributaria ("SUNAT") assessment during an audit of years 1999-2000. During 2005, the Peruvian tax authorities. AsCompany established a resultnew policy related to housing for employees which involved the granting of these settlements,cash advances in order to facilitate the claims for tax refunds were reduced by $7.6 million in 2004. The majorityimprovement of this reduction arose due to an accrued tax liability established in 2003 being offset against the claims for tax refunds, following the relinquishment of certain tax claims by the Peruvian tax authorities as part of the settlements.houses.

    7. INVENTORIES
    8. At December 31,

      2004

      2003

      In-process

      $ 20,184

      $ 14,702

      Precious metals

      565

      4,239

      Materials and supplies

      27,655

      28,044

      $ 48,404

      $ 46,985

       

      At December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      In-process

      $ 14,924

      $ 20,184

      Precious metals

      1,407

      565

      Materials and supplies

      51,627

      27,655

       

      $ 67,958

      $ 48,404

    9. STOCKPILES AND ORE ON LEACH PADS
    10. At December 31,

      2004

      2003

      Current - Ore on leach

      $ 88,447

      $ 132,031

      Long-term

      Stockpiles

      $ 6,925

      $ 3,258

      Ore on leach pads

      73,496

      69,045

      $ 80,421

      $ 72,303

       

      At December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      Current - ore on leach pads

      $ 65,875

      $ 88,447

      Long-term

      Stockpiles

      $ 5,744

      $ 6,925

      Ore on leach pads

      123,445

      73,496

       

      $ 129,189

      $ 80,421

    11. PROPERTY, PLANT AND MINE DEVELOPMENT
    12.  

      At December 31, 2004

      At December 31, 2003

      At December 31, 2005

      At December 31, 2004

      Original Depreciable Life (in years)

      Cost

      Accumulated Depreciation Depletion and Amortization

      Net Book Value

      Cost

      Accumulated Depreciation Depletion and Amortization

      Net Book Value

      Cost

      Accumulated
      Depreciation
      Depletion and
      Amortization

      Net Book Value

      Cost

      Accumulated
      Depreciation
      Depletion and
      Amortization

      Net Book Value

       

       

       

      (in thousands)

       

       

       

      (in thousands)

       

       

       

      Land

       

      17,856

      -

      17,856

      14,935

      -

      14,935

      22,233

      -

      22,233

      17,856

      -

      17,856

      Buildings and equipment

      Useful life of buildings (12-25 years), Leach pads (5 years) and equipment (7 years) and 5 years for all remaining asset

      1,289,758

      ( 696,720)

      593,038

      1,096,306

      (558,223)

      538,083

      1,430,284

      (845,977 )

      584,307

      1,289,758

      (696,720 )

      593,038

      Mine development

      UOP based on grams mined (8-21 years)

      235,863

      ( 72,212)

      163,651

      197,052

      (56,396)

      140,656

      290,785

      (106,667 )

      184,118

      235,863

      (72,212 )

      163,651

      Mineral interests

      UOP for producing property (12 years)

      33,991

      ( 2,927)

      31,064

      33,990

      (2,127)

      31,863

      34,160

      (3,907 )

      30,253

      33,991

      (2,927 )

      31,064

      Asset retirement cost

      Based on the related assets (5 to 15 years)

      72,742

      ( 41,971)

      30,771

      49,352

      (36,116)

      13,236

      94,705

      (49,052 )

      45,653

      72,742

      (41,971 )

      30,771

      Construction-in-progress

       

      46,566

      -

      46,566

      55,754

      -

      55,754

      76,699

      -

      76,699

      46,566

      -

      46,566

       

      1,696,776

      ( 813,830)

      882,946

      1,447,389

      (652,862)

      794,527

      1,948,866

      (1,005,603 )

      943,263

      1,696,776

      (813,830 )

      882,946

      Leased assets included above in property, plant and mine development

      5 years

      30,193

      ( 23,756)

      6,437

      30,193

      (17,818)

      12,375

      Leased assets included above in Buildings and equipment

      30,193

      (27,680 )

      2,513

      30,193

      (23,756 )

      6,437

       

      At December 31, 2004

      At December 31, 2003

       

      Gross Carrying Value

      Accumulated Amortization

      Net Book Value

      Gross Carrying Value

      Accumulated Amortization

      Net Book Value

       

       

       

      (in thousands)

       

       

       

      Mineral interests:

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Production stage

      8,432

      ( 2,568)

      5,864

      8,432

      (1,840)

      6,592

      Development stage

      20,298

      ( 174)

      20,124

      -

      -

      -

      Exploration stage

      5,261

      ( 185)

      5,076

      25,558

      (287)

      25,217

      Total

      33,991

      ( 2,927)

      31,064

      33,990

      (2,127)

      31,863

      Estimated Useful Lives

      Years

      Buildings and equipment

      Useful life of buildings

      12 to 25

      Leach pads

      5

      Equipment

      7

      All remaining assets

      5

      Mine development

      UOP based on grams mined

      8 to 21

      Mineral interests

      UOP for producing property

      12

      Asset retirement cost

      Based on related asset

      5 to 15

      Leased assets included above in Property, plant and mine development

      5

       

      At December 31, 2005

      At December 31, 2004

       

      Gross Carrying Value

      Accumulated
      Amortization

      Net Book Value

      Gross Carrying Value

      Accumulated
      Amortization

      Net Book Value

       

       

       

      (in thousands)

       

       

       

      Mineral Interests:

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Production stage

      8,432

      (3,548 )

      4,884

      8,432

      (2,568 )

      5,864

      Development stage

      20,297

      (174 )

      20,123

      20,298

      (174 )

      20,124

      Exploration stage

      5,431

      (185 )

      5,246

      5,261

      (185 )

      5,076

      Total

      34,160

      (3,907 )

      30,253

      33,991

      (2,927 )

      31,064

      On March 31, 2004, the EITF ratified EITF Issue No.04-2, "Whether Mining Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets" to address the inconsistency in the classification of mineral rights as tangible or intangible assets. EITF 04-2 provides that certain mineral use rights have characteristics of assets other than intangible assets and are considered tangible assets which should be accounted for based on their substance. The effects of adopting this EITF arewere accounted for prospectively. As a result, the Company has reclassified all of its mineral interests fromMineral interests and other intangible assetstoProperty, plant and mine development, net in its balance sheets and ceased amortization on exploration stage mineral interests prior to the commencement of production effective April 1, 2004.

      As of December 31, 2005, an agglomeration plant with a carrying value of US$32.5 million was included in property, plant and equipment at La Quinua. In 2004 the Company maintains in its accounting records assets for $32.5 million related to the agglomeration plant at La Quinua, net of depreciation and $2.5 million in spares parts associated with the plant and recorded in 2004 a $4.1US$4.1 million impairment for assetsthe portion of this equipment with no projected future value. It is anticipated that thesethe remaining assets will be utilized in the construction of a gold mill planned for completion in between 2006 and 2007.

      As of December 31, 2003, based on a cash flow analysis of the most recent estimated costs associated with retirement, reclamation and remediation to be incurred, a decrease of $27.2 million in the estimated asset retirement cost was computed. In addition, the Company recorded in Other expenses a write-off of $16.6 million related to impaired capitalized assets at the Maqui-Maqui mine.2008.

    13. ACCRUEDOTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
    14. At December 31,

      2004

      2003

      Payroll

      $ 3,175

      $ 2,200

      Taxes other than income

      2,235

      3,944

      Withholding income tax

      1,086

      2,688

      Capital projects accruals

      11,014

      5,168

      Operating cost accruals

      18,887

      6,016

      Other

      159

      2,176

      $ 36,556

      $ 22,192

       

      At December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      Capital projects accruals

      $ 18,900

      $ 10,945

      Operating cost accruals

      13,750

      18,216

      Reclamation and remediation

      5,623

      4,312

      Payroll

      4,279

      3,175

      Taxes other than income tax

      3,994

      2,235

      Withholding income tax

      1,335

      1,086

      Deferred income tax liabilities

      389

      1,041

      Deferred revenue

      -

      105

      Other

      96

      159

       

      $ 48,366

      $ 41,274

    15. WORKERS' PROFIT SHARING
    16. In accordance with Peruvian legislation, the Company maintains an employee profit sharing plan equal to 8% of annual taxable income. Distributions to employees under the plan are based 50% on the number of days that each employee worked during the preceding year and 50% on proportionate annual salary levels.

      In 2004,2005, the current portion of workers' profit sharing amounted to $53.9US$68.8 million which has been included in the costsCosts applicable to sales in the statement of profit and loss ($44.553.9 million in 2003)2004). This expense is deductible for income tax purposes.

      Peruvian law limits payments of annual profit sharing per employee to eighteen months salary but continues to base total profit sharing on 8% of taxable income, notwithstanding the per employee limitation. Supreme Decree N.009-98-TR,N'009-98-TR, published on August 6, 1998, provides that the excess of total profit sharing for the year over aggregate profit sharing payable to all employees be paid to the Fondo Nacional de Capacitación Laboral y de Promoción del Empleo - FONCALPROEM. This entity, created by Legislative Decree N.892,N'892, is responsible for managing this fund, which is intended for future training or employment generation in Peru. The Company made payments to FONCALPROEM in 2004 for $13.22005 of US$15.0 million ($0.9(US$13.2 million in 2003)2004).

    17. RECLAMATION AND REMEDIATION (Asset Retirement Obligations)(ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS)
    18. The Company's mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.regulations in all material respects. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements.

      The liability corresponds primarily to activities to be performed in the reclamation and remediation of mining activities once the gold extraction process has been finished. Theses activities include reclamation of the mine sites, operating water treatment plants, revegetation and earth works.

      The following is a reconciliation of the total liability for asset retirement obligations (ARO) (in thousands):reclamation and remediation:

      Balance January 1, 2003

      $ 29,427

      Impact of adoption of SFAS No. 143

      72,095

      Additions, change in estimates and other

      ( 10,608)

      Liabilities settled

      ( 5,700)

      Accretion expense

      6,534

      Balance December 31, 20032004

      $ 91,748

      Additions, change in estimates and other, net

      14,643

      Liabilities settled

      ( 5,386)5,386 )

      Accretion expense

      6,026

      Balance December 31, 2004

      $ 107,031

      Additions, change in estimates and other, net

      11,196

      Liabilities settled

      (6,721)

      Accretion expense

      7,059

      Balance December 31, 2005

      $ 118,565

      The ARO corresponds primarily to activities to be performedcurrent portion ofReclamation and remediation liabilities of $5.6 million and $4.3 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are included in the restoration of the mines and related areas once the gold extraction process has been finished. The main activities that the Company plans to perform for each mine include the operation of water treatment plants, revegetation, and earth work.Other current liabilities.

      Increases in the asset retirement obligation in 2005 and 2004 relate primarily to the expanded mining operations and new facilities at Yanacocha and La Quinua and the related projected remediation and reclamation costs for this expansion.

      On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." As a result, the reclamationReclamation and remediation liabilityliabilities increased by $72.1 million for the fair value of the estimated asset retirement obligation, deferred profit sharing increased by $2.3 million for the legally required profit sharing and the deferredDeferred income tax liability increased by $7.9 million,Property,, plant and mine development,, net increased by $49.9 million and a $32.4 million charge was recorded for theCumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax.tax.

      On a pro forma basis, the liabilities for asset retirement obligations would have been $101.5 million at December 31, 2002, if SFAS No. 143 had been applied at the beginning of 2002.

      The table below presents the proforma effect of the accounting change for year ended December 31, 2002 as if the change had been in effect for that period:

      Increase/(decrease) to net income

      As reported

      $ 197,922

      Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, and
      amortization shown separately below)

      659

      Depreciation, depletion, and amortization

      ( 7,502)

      Income tax benefit

      2,395

      Loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

      ( 4,448)

      Pro forma

      $ 193,474

    19. DEBT
    20. At December 31,

      2004

      2003

      International Finance Corporation

      $ 30,000

      $ 40,000

      Trust Certificates

      -

      16,000

      Newmont Perú SRL

      6,553

      9,777

      Mobil Oil del Perú S.A.

      702

      1,094

      Others

      61

      485

      37,316

      67,356

      (16,156)

      (30,012)

      Current portion

      $ 21,160

      $ 37,344

       

      At December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      International Finance Corporation

      $ -

      $ 30,000

      Newmont Perú SRL

      2,850

      6,553

      Mobil Oil del Perú S.A.

      310

      702

      Others

      -

      61

       

      3,160

      37,316

      Current portion

      (3,160 )

      (16,156 )

       

      $ -

      $ #9; 21,160

      Scheduled minimum long-term debt repayments are $16.2 million in 2005, $15.2 million in 2006, $2.0 million in 2007, $2.0 million in 2008 and $2.0 million in 2009.

      International Finance Corporation ("IFC")

      $100 million Credit Facility: In December 1999, the Company entered into a $100 million credit facility (a $20 million A Tranche and a $80 million B Tranche) with the IFC. AtIFC. On December 31, 2004, $3015, 2005, the Company fully repaid the outstanding balances of $15 million was outstanding in total, with $10and $9 million outstanding under the A Tranche and $20 million outstanding under the B Tranche. TheTranche and A Tranche had a five-year revolving availability period and converted into a five-year term loan in December 2004. The B Tranche had a three-year revolving availability period and converted to a four-year term loan in December 2002.respectively. Initial drawdowns under the loan were used for development of the La Quinua project; however, the loan accommodated repayments during the revolving availability period and subsequent borrowings were used for other purposes. Interest applicable to the A Tranche iswas LIBOR plus 2.375%. Interest applicable to the B Tranche iswas LIBOR plus 2.5%. Certain of the Company's assets securesecured the loan.

      The A Tranche interest rate was 4.9% and 3.5%5.0% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.2004. The weighted-average rate was 5.4% and 3.8% for 2005 and 4.3% for 2004, and 2003, respectively. The B Tranche interest rate was 5.0% and 3.4% at December 31, 2004, and 2003, respectively. The weighted average rate was 5.5% and 4.0% for 2005 and 3.7% for 2004, and 2003, respectively. Using prevailing interest rates on similar instruments, the estimated fair value of this debt approximated the carrying value at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

      Trust Certificates

      The Company issued debt in 1997 through the sale of $100 million 8.4% Series A Trust Certificates to various institutional investors. In June 2004, the Trust Certificates were paid in full. At December 31, 2003, $16.0 million was outstanding under the financing. Interest on the Certificates was fixed at 8.4% and repayments occurred quarterly through June 2004. The Certificates were collateralized by certain of Minera Yanacocha's assets, certain restricted funds and also were specifically collateralized by future gold sales, through a trust agreement with the Bank of New York. The Company fully repaid the outstanding balance of $16 million in 2004.

      Newmont Peru SRL

      In October 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Newmont Peru SRL, formerly known as "Newmont Peru Limited, Sucursal del Perú" (100% indirectly owned subsidiary of Newmont) for the lease of haulage and drilling equipment, with a purchase option for all or part of the leased equipment. The lease is accounted for as a capital lease and is subject to monthly rental payments through September 2006. The interest rate is 16% for all periods. Fair market value can notcannot be practicably determined due to the lack of available market information.

      Banco de Crédito del Perú

      In June 2004, Yanacocha amended its $40 million line of credit with Banco Dede Crédito del Perú to extend the term of the facility to June 2007, reduce the applicable interest rate and increase the facility to $50 million. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 0.65% through June 2005 and LIBOR plus 2% thereafter. The interest rate under the previous agreement was LIBOR plus 0.75% through June 2004. The weighted-average interest rate was 2.8% for 2002. During 2005, the Company did not borrow any funds under this line. In 2004, the Company in the aggregatedaggregate borrowed $65.5 million and repaid $65.5 million. There waswere no outstanding amountamounts under this line of credit line at December 31, 20042005 and 2003.2004.

      Banco Continental

      In June 2004, the Company entered into a $20 million credit facility with BBV Banco Continental that expiresexpired in June 2005. The interest rate iswas LIBOR plus 0.7%. There was no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2004. During the year noNo amounts were borrowed under this revolving line of credit.

      Mobil Oil del Perú S.A.

      The Company has an installment purchase agreement with Mobil Oil del Perú S.A. for the purchase of certain fueling station assets through 2006. The interest rate for 2004 and 2003 and at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was 9.1%. Fair market value can not be practicably determined due to the lack of available market information.

      Restricted Funds

      Under terms of the Trust Certificates loan, the Company maintained an escrow account for the next interest and principal installment due. As of December 31, 2003, such amount totaled $16.7 million and the escrow account amounts are included in restricted funds. As the Trust Certificates were fully paid in June 2004, the escrow accounts were closed in 2004.

      Compliance with Covenants

      The financing agreements contain certain covenants that limit indebtedness and distributions of earnings to partners, among others. In addition, the Company mustwas required to maintain certain financial ratios as provided in the financing agreements. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, theThe Company was in compliance with these covenants.covenants during the periods in which the financing agreements were outstanding.

      Registration of Bond Program

      On December 19, 2005, the Company filed with the Peruvian securities regulatory authority (CONASEV), for its review and approval, a prospectus to register a $200 million bond program in the Peruvian public market. The registration would make the bond program available for the Company to make up to $200 million in issuances over a two-year period. Any funds generated from the bond program may be used by the Company for capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.

    21. PARTNERS' EQUITY
    22. PartnersPartners' Contributions

      Partners' contributions represent 714,960,104 common partnership interests with a par value of one Peruvian Nuevo sol each, fully subscribed and paid. Such partnership interest includes 402,880,019 that are owned by foreign investors.

      On December 31, 2001, the partners approved the capitalization of $206.5 million (equivalent to S/.710,360,000) from restricted earnings to partners' contributions related to the 1998 and 1999 Reinvestment Programs (Note 11)12). The Company cannot reduce its partners' contributions within four consecutive years following the related capitalization.

      Under current Peruvian regulations, there is no restriction on remittance of dividends or repatriation of foreign investment, except as discussed in sections below.

      The legal structure of the Company is that of a Limited Liability Partnership. The main characteristics of such structure are: (i) the number of partners cannot exceed 20, (ii) the capital is represented by partnership interest, and (iii) there is no obligation to create a legal reserve.

      Restricted Earnings

      As explained in Note 12, $189.6 million of earnings were restricted as a result of the application of the 2001-2004 Reinvestment Program.

      Retained Earnings

      Effective January 1, 2003, distribution of earnings for partners other than legal entities domiciled in Peru are subject to a withholding tax of 4.1%.

    23. TAXES
    24. Tax Stabilization Agreements

      The Company has entered into the following tax stabilization agreements, each with a term of 15 years:

      Mine

      Mine

      Effective

      Date of the
      tax agreement

      Tax regimes
      in force

      Carachugo/San José

      January 1, 1995

      May 19, 1994

      October 29, 1999

      Maqui Maqui

      January 1, 1997

      September 12, 1994

      May 6, 1994

      Cerro Yanacocha

      January 1, 2000

      September 16, 1998

      May 22, 1997

      La Quinua

      January 1, 2004

      August 25, 2003

      August 25, 2003

      These agreements guarantee the Company's use of the tax regimes shown in the table above and permit maintenance of its accounting records in U.S. dollars.

      Management has determined the taxable income according to its understanding, and that of its legal advisors, of the applicable tax legislation. This legislation requires adding to and deducting from accounting income shownas determined in the financial statements, those items that the referred legislation recognizes as taxable and non-taxable, respectively.

      For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 the income tax rate was 30% except for La Quinua mine for which a 27% income tax rate applied for 2003 and a 29% income tax rate for 2004 and future years.

      Peruvian Income Tax and Workers Participation

      The current income tax and the workers' profit sharing (Note 8) have been determined as follows:

      Year ended December 31,

      Year ended December 31,

      2004

      2003

      2002

      2005

      2004

      2003

      Income before workers' profit sharing and income tax in accordance with Peruvian GAAP Plus:

      $ 659,662

      $ 487,472

      $ 303,446

      Income before workers' profit sharing and income tax in accordance with Peruvian GAAP

      $ 852,316

      $ 659,662

      $ 487,472

      Plus:

       

      Reclamation liability

      3,134

      54,785

      6,876

      3,374

      3,134

      54,785

      Non-deductible expenses

      13,760

      9,796

      5,978

      18,495

      13,760

      9,796

      Income tax recorded as other expenses

      20,318

      8,030

      -

      14,983

      20,318

      8,030

      Provision for obsolescence of inventories

      1,392

      3,500

      -

      352

      1,392

      3,500

      Other

      4,469

      11,359

      1,388

      3,862

      4,469

      11,357

      43,073

      87,468

      14,242

      41,066

      43,073

      87,468

      Less:

       

      Depreciation of mine development and of mineral interests

      (22,118)

      (12,231)

      (10,763)

      (19,487 )

      (22,118 )

      (12,231 )

      Reclamation liability

      (5,386)

      (5,700)

      (3,844)

      Depreciation straight line

      (7,778 )

      -

      Reclamation expenses

      (6,721 )

      (5,386 )

      (5,700 )

      Others

      (2,016)

      (674)

      (1,701)

      -

      (2,016 )

      (674 )

       

       

      (33,986 )

      (29,520 )

      (18,605 )

      (29,520)

      (18,605)

      (16,308)

       

       

      Base to calculate the workers' profit sharing

      673,215

      556,335

      301,380

      859,396

      673,215

      556,335

      Workers' profit participation (8%)

      (53,857)

      (44,507)

      (24,110)

       

       

      Workers' profit participation 8%

      (68,752 )

      (53,857 )

      (44,507 )

      Sub-total

      619,358

      511,828

      277,270

      790,644

      619,358

      511,828

      Tax benefit on reinvested earnings

      -

      (23,680)

      (96,000)

      -

      (23,680 )

      Taxable income

      $ 619,358

      $ 488,148

      $ 181,270

      $ 790,644

      $ 619,358

      $ 488,148

       

      Income tax (30%)

      $ 185,807

      $ 146,444

      $ 54,381

      $ 237,193

      $ 185,807

      $ 146,444

      Credit for charitable donations

      (1,260)

      (348)

      (416)

      (1,767 )

      (1,260 )

      (348 )

      Adjustment due to the income tax rate applicable to La Quinua mine

      (3,098)

      (5,934)

      (2,443)

      Net income tax

      $ 181,449

      $ 140,162

      $ 51,522

      Adjustment due to the income tax rate applicable to La Quinua

      (3,931 )

      (3,098 )

      (5,934 )

      Current income tax

      $ 231,495

      $ 181,449

      $ 140,162

      Reinvestment of Earnings

      Pursuant to Supreme Decree N.027-98-EF,N'027-98-EF, mining companies can obtain a tax benefit ("Investment Credit") by effectively reinvesting non-distributed earnings into capital expansion projects that increase the Company's productivity ("Reinvestment Program"). Investment Credits, based on 80% of amounts reinvested, are obtained by application to and approval by the Ministry of Energy and Mines.

      On March 4, 2003, the Company received a resolution from the Ministry of Energy and Mine (MEM) dated February 28, 2003, in which it approved the reinvestment program for the years 2002-2004 for an amount of $189.6 million.

      The Company received a subsequent resolution from the MEM dated June 27, 2003, with the following rulings: a) amended the years to be included in the reinvestment program (from 2001 to 2004) and b) confirmed that the investment that would be part of the program between 2002 and 2004 amounts to $189.6 million.

      As of December 31, 2003, theThe Company transferred from retained earnings to restricted earnings $189.6 million according with the above reinvestment program approved, as follows: $29.6 million in 2003, $80 million in 2002, and $80$160 million in prior years whichyears. The reinvestment tax credit reduced the current income tax by $7.1 million $7.1 million and $19.2 million in 2004 2003, and 2002 respectively.2003.

      Undistributed earnings associated with these investment credits are presented as restricted earnings as of December 31, 2004, 20032005 and 2002.2004.

      Income tax - Reconciliation from Peru Tax Return to U.S. GAAP and Tax Balance Sheets

      The Company's income tax provision consisted of the following:

      Year ended December 31,

      2004

      2003

      2002

      Year ended December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      2003

      Current Peru tax return

      $ 181,449

      $ 140,162

      $ 51,552

      $ 231,495

      $ 181,449

      $ 140,162

      Income tax recorded as other expenses for Peru GAAP

      18,046

      8,030

      -

      12,965

      18,046

      8,030

      Current US GAAP

      199,495

      148,192

      51,522

      Current U.S. GAAP

      244,460

      199,495

      148,192

      Deferred

      (17,932)

      (26,504)

      $ 13,089

      (9,053 )

      (17,932 )

      (26,504 )

      Total

      $ 181,563

      $ 121,688

      $ 64,611

      Income tax expense

      $ 235,407

      $ 181,563

      $ 121,688

      Income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory Peruvian corporate income tax rate of 30 percent to pre-tax income as a result of the following:

      Year ended December 31,

      Year ended December 31,

      2004

      2003

      2002

      2005

      2004

      2003

       

       

      Income before income tax provision

      $ 571,867

      $ 474,453

      $ 262,533

      $ 760,881

      $ 571,867

      $ 474,453

      Peruvian statutory rate

      30%

      30 %

      Income tax at statutory rate

      171,560

      142,336

      78,760

      228,264

      171,560

      142,336

      2001 investment credit

      (7,104)

      (28,800)

      2001 deferred investment credit

      -

      (7,776)

      14,880

      Investment credit

      -

      (7,104 )

      Deferred investment credit

      -

      (7,776 )

      Income tax recognized through refilling of tax returns

      8,993

      3,615

      -

      5,255

      8,993

      3,615

      Income tax recognized through SEAP

      -

      2,257

      -

      -

      2,257

      Difference due to the income tax
      rate of la Quinua mine

      (3,098)

      (5,934)

      (2,443)

      Difference due to change for
      deferred income tax related to the
      revisions of SFAS No. 143

      -

      (7,512)

      -

      Difference due to the income tax
      rate of La Quinua

      (3,931 )

      (3,098)

      (5,934 )

      Difference due to change for
      deferred income tax related to the revisions of SFAS No.143

      -

      (7,512 )

      Income tax from tax disputes

      5,394

      -

      -

      894

      5,394

      -

      Other

      5,818

      1,806

      2,214

      4,925

      5,818

      1,806

      Total income tax expense

      $ 181,563

      $ 121,688

      $ 64,611

      $ 235,407

      $ 181,563

      $ 121,688

      Components of deferred income tax liabilities and assets were as follows:

      At December 31,

      2004

      2003

      Deferred tax liabilities -

      Property, plant and mine development costs

      $ 93,879

      $ 98,529

      Inventories

      5,368

      8,800

      Benefit by reinvesting

      -

      7,104

      Debt issuance costs

      245

      432

      Other

      (139)

      -

      99,353

      114,865

      Deferred tax asset -

      Reclamation costs

      (22,171)

      (16,381)

      Deferred profit sharing

      (6,362)

      (8,198)

      Other

      ( 96)

      (1,630)

      (28,629)

      (26,209)

      Net deferred tax liability

      $ 70,724

      $ 88,656

      Current deferred tax liabilities

      1,041

      16,852

      Non-current deferred tax liabilities

      69,683

      71,804

      Net deferred tax liability

      $ 70,724

      $ 88,656

       

      At December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      Deferred tax liabilities

       

       

      Property, plant and mine development costs

      $ 84,309

      $ 93,879

      Inventories

      7,719

      5,368

      Debt issuance costs

      169

      245

      Other

      (752 )

      (139)

       

      91,445

      99,353

       

       

       

      Deferred tax assets

       

       

      Reclamation costs

      (24,418 )

      (22,171 )

      Deferred profit sharing

      (5,196 )

      (6,362 )

      Other

      (160 )

      (96 )

       

      (29,774 )

      (28,629 )

      Net deferred tax liability

      $ 61,671

      $ 70,724

       

       

       

      Current deferred tax liabilities

      389

      1,041

      Non-current deferred tax liabilities

      61,282

      69,683

      Net deferred tax liability

      $ 61,671

      $ 70,724

    25. DUE TO/FROM RELATED PARTIES LIABILITIES AND TRANSACTIONS
    26. The Company has the following obligationreceivables and liabilities to related parties:

      At December 31,

      2004

      2003

      Chaupiloma

      $ 10,701

      $ 7,613

      Newmont Peru SRL

      3,486

      2,484

      Newmont SF Chile

      44

      -

      Newmont International Services

      2,910

      -

      Newmont Mining Corporation

      1,668

      -

      Current portion

      $ 18,809

      $ 10,097

       

      At December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      Due from related parties

       

       

      Newmont Peru SRL

      357

      -

      Empresa Minera Inti Raymi SA

      8

      -

       

      $ 365

      -

       

       

       

      Due to related parties

       

       

      S.M.R.L. Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca

      $ 15,247

      $ 10,701

      Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A.

      77

      88

      Consorcio Energético Huancavelica S.A.

      323

      671

      Newmont Peru SRL

      4,049

      3,486

      Newmont SF Chile

      11

      44

      Newmont International Services

      -

      2,910

      Newmont Mining Corporation

      -

      1,668

      Newmont Mining Corporation Canada

      36

      -

      Newmont Technologies Limited

      514

      -

      NUSA

      618

      -

       

      $ 20,875

      $ 19,568

      Management, exploration, mine development, engineering and employment services are provided pursuant to contracts with affiliated companies. The corresponding charges totaled $45.7 million, $36.1 million and $31.1 million in 2005, 2004 and $14.1 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The outstanding balances for these services are disclosed in the above table.

      As described in Note 1, the Company pays Chaupiloma a 3% royalty on quarterly production sold at current market prices, after deducting refinery and transportation costs. Royalty expense totaled $45.6 million, $37.9 million and $31.7 million in 2005, 2004 and $21.6 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

    27. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
    28. Net cash provided byfrom operating activities included the following cash payments:

       

      Year ended December 31,

       

      2004

      2003

      202

       

       

       

       

      Income taxes paid

      $ 232,018

      $ 85,822

      $ 11,582

      Interest paid

      $ 3,711

      $ 6,453

      $ 11,336

       

      Year ended December 31,

       

      2005

      2004

      2003

      Income taxes paid

      $ 234,667

      $ 232,018

      $ 85,822

      Interest paid net of capitalized interest

      $ 2,281

      $ 3,711

      $ 6,453

      The adoption of SFAS 143, for the year ended December 31, 2003, resulted in non-cash increases to property, plant and mine development and reclamation and remediation liability of $50 million and $72 million, respectively.

    29. MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND EXPORT SALES
    30. The Company is not economically dependent on a limited number of customers for the sale of its product because gold can be sold through various commodity market traders worldwide. In 2005, sales to one customer accounted for $1.47 billion which represents 99% of total annual sales. In 2004, sales to two customers accounted for $860.1 million and $349.4 million which representsrepresented 97% of total annual sales. In 2003, sales to two customers accounted for $446.7 million and $431.5 million which represents 84% of total annual sales. Virtually allAll gold sales were made outside of Peru.

    31. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

    Tax contingencies

    As is customary, the tax returns of the Company are subject to review by the various Peruvian taxing authorities. At present, the income taxing authorities are reviewinghave reviewed the Company's tax filings for the years 1998 throughup to year 2001. In connection with this review, the taxing authorities have identified certain adjustments with which the Company and its advisors do not agree. In the fourth quarter of 2004 a $11.5 million payment was made to the income taxing authorities principally to stop the runningaccruing of interest and penalties on proposed adjustments that are timing in nature. Other matters in dispute also relate to the timing of certain income tax deductions. The Company has established an accrued liability for financial reporting purposes in an amount that represents management's best judgment concerning the amount that is required to be included in its income tax expense as a result of the current tax review. In the opinion of management, the resolution of the income tax controversy will not have a material impact on the financial condition or liquidity of the Company.

    The Company charged $17.3 million to 2004 income from total tax assessment of $35.0 million. The payments to the Tax Administration during 2004 related to these tax contingencies amounted to $11.5 million.

    Peruvian Mining Royalty

    During the second quarter of 2004, the government of Peru enacted legislation to establish a sliding scale mining royalty of up to 3% based on the volume of mine production. The royalty is calculated on revenue from sales of product less certain refining and transportation expenses. While the Peruvian royalty became effective during the second quarter of 2004, it does not apply to those projects that had stabilization agreements prior to the adoption of the royalty law. Virtually all of theThe Company's current production is derived from projects that were stabilized prior to the enactment of the royalty legislation. However, pending amendment or successful legal challenges to the validity of the royalty legislation, future production from non-stabilized projects could be burdened by this royalty.

    Reinvestment program

    As of June 30, 2004, the Company completed all of its investments under the Reinvestment Program 2000 - 2004. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the filing before the Mining and Energy Ministry requesting the audit of the investment incurred is pending.

    Unitization of Properties

    In December 2000, as a result of the unitization plan mentioned in Note 1,carried out by partners, the Company signed several asset transfer and mining lease agreements with related entities. The main conditions are:

    Legal Proceedings

    Choropampa (mercury spill)

    In June 2000, a transport contractor of the Company spilled approximately 151 kilograms of elemental mercury near the town of Choropampa, Peru, which is located 53 miles (85 kilometers) southwest of the mine. Elemental mercury is a by-product of gold mining and was sold tomining. After the spill, a Lima firm for use in medical instrumentation and industrial applications. A comprehensive health and environmental remediation program was undertaken by the Company. In August 2000, the Company paid under protest paid a fine of 1,740,000 newS/.1,740,000 Peruvian solesNuevos Soles (approximately $0.5 million) to the Peruvian Government.Government (Ministry of Energy and Mining). The Company entered into settlement agreements with a number of individuals impacted by the incident. In addition, it has entered into agreements with three of the communities impacted by this incident to provide a variety of public works as compensation for the disruption and inconvenience caused by the incident. As a result, of the incident, the Company, from the date of the spill, has incurred approximat ely $7.0 million net of insurance refunds. The Company, cannot predict the likelihood of any additional expenditure related to this matter.

    In September 2001, the Companycompanies and other defendants were named in a lawsuit by over 9001000 Peruvian citizens and the Provincial Municipality of Cajamarca in the Denver District Court of the State of Colorado. This action seeks compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the mercury spill incident. This action was dismissed by the Denver District Court in May 2002. The Colorado Court of Appeals reversed the lower court ruling and the Colorado Supreme Court declined to review the matter. In February 2005, the Company answered the complaint in Denver District Court of the State of Colorado.

    In July 2002, Yanacocha and other defendants were served with other lawsuits in the Denver District Court for the State of Colorado and in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, by approximately 140 additional Peruvian plaintiffs and by the same plaintiffs who filed the September 2001 lawsuit. These actions also seek compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the mercury spill incident near the town of Choropampa. These lawsuits remain stayed pending further judicial action.

    In May 2002, additional lawsuits related to the Choropampa incident were filed against the Company in two of the local courts of Cajamarca in Peru by over 900 Peruvian citizens. A significant numberSuch lawsuits seek the payment of $229,420,000 and S/.1,245,000 Peruvian Nuevos Soles. As of December 31, 2005, the Company has entered into settlement agreements with approximately 40% of the plaintiffs for amounts considerably lower than those initially claimed in their lawsuits, significantly reducing the contingency that these lawsuits created.

    In addition, more than half of the remaining plaintiffs in these lawsuitsPeruvian cases had previously have entered into settlement agreements with the Company. In December 2003,Company prior to filing their lawsuits. The Company has filed motions to dismiss based on these previous settlements and has obtained positive judgments by the SuperiorCivil Court of the Cajamarca granted a resolution upholdingSuperior Court. The Plaintiffs have appealed many of these rulings to Peru's Supreme Court where they remain pending.

    As of December 31, 2005, the validity of certain of the settlement agreements. This rulingCompany has spent approximately $22.7 million, which has been appealedoffset by approximately $12.8 million of insurance proceeds, on public works, remediation efforts, personal compensation and compensation to the Peruvian Supreme Court.communities as well as fines, attorneys' fees and other related costs and expenditures. The Company is not able to reasonablycannot predict the final outcomeamount of additional expenditures related to this matter or the result of any of the describedthese lawsuits.

    Conga

    The Company is involved in a dispute with the Provincial Municipality of Celendin regarding the authority of that governmental body to regulate the development of the Minas Conga ore deposit. In 2004, the Municipality of Celendin enacted a similaran ordinance to that enacted by the Municipality of Cajamarca with regard to Cerro Quilish, as described below, declaring the area around Minas Conga to be a mining-free reserve and naturally protected area. As in the Cerro Quilish case (see below), the Company has challenged this ordinance on the grounds that, under Peruvian law, local governments lack the authority to create such areas, denying the rights granted by the Company's mining concessions. Based on the precedentprecedents established by the Constitutional Tribunal's treatment ofTribunal, the Cerro Quilish Municipal ordinance, it is reasonable to believeCompany believes that a similar finding protecting the Company's rights will be made as to the Celendin ordinance.made.

    Hacienda Los Negritos

    From time to time,On October 21, 2002, the Company was sued by Grimaldina Malpica Rojas, seeking: (i) the repossession of the "Los Negritos" property, which is involvedcurrently held and occupied by the Company, and (ii) a payment for damages of up to $65 million.

    The Company has opposed the lawsuit and all its terms, requesting that her registration of the property in variousthe Public Registry of Cajamarca be declared void. The legal proceedingsproceeding is currently pending resolution in Cajamarca's court of a kind normal to its business. It does not believefirst instance. The Company believes that adverse decisions in any pending or threatened proceedings or that amounts which it may be required to pay by reason thereof will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

    Other contingencies - Cerro Quilish

    The Company was involved in a dispute with the Provincial Municipality of Cajamarca regarding the authority of that governmental body to regulate the development of the Cerro Quilish ore depositdeposit. At December 31, 2003 this deposit contained reserves of approximately 3.9 million (unaudited) ounces of gold. This material has been moved to non reserve mineralization as of December 31, 2004, see Note 1.

    Cerro Quilish is located in the same watershed in which the City of Cajamarca is located. The Municipality enacted an ordinance declaring Cerro Quilish and its watershed to be a reserve and naturally protected area. The Company challenged this ordinance on the grounds that, under Peruvian law, local governments lack authority to create such areas. The Peruvian Constitutional Tribunal heard the case in early 2003 and ruled on April 7, 2003. The ruling established that the Company's rights were not impacted by the ordinance; that the Company would complete a full environmental impact study prio rprior to initiating any development at Cerro Quilish; and, adopt mitigation measures necessary to protect the quality and quantity of the water supply of the City of Cajamarca. In July 2004, the Company received a drilling permit and commenced exploration activities on the Cerro Quilish deposit. During September 2004, individuals from the Cajamarca region conducted a sustained blockade of theth e road between the City of Cajamarca and the mine site, in protest of these exploration activities. The Company suspended all drilling activities at Cerro Quilish and the blockade was resolved. In November 2004, in recognition of the communities' concerns, the Company requested and received the revocation of its Cerro Quilish drilling permit. In this regard, the Company has been working on re-establishing the "social license to operate" with the purpose of improving its relationship with the community of Cajamarca.

      In 2004, the Company reassessed the challenges involved in obtaining required permits for Cerro Quilish primarily related to increased community concerns. Based upon this reassessment, the Company reclassified 3.9 million (unaudited) ounces of gold from reserves to non-reserve mineralization.

    1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES FOLLOWED BY THE COMPANY AND PERUVIAN GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

    The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP), which differ in certain respects from principles generally accepted in Peru (Peruvian GAAP). Such differences involve certain methods of measuring the amounts shown in the financial statements, as well as additional disclosures required. The effects of these measurement differences are reflected in the reconciliation below and principally relate to items discussed in the following paragraphs:

      1. Stockpile, ore on leach pads and inventories -
      2. The Company did not capitalize depreciation costs as a component of stockpile, ore on leach pads, or inventory prior to 2002 as required under U.S. GAAP. Beginning January 1, 2002, the Company began to capitalize depreciation as a component of stockpile, ore on leach pads and inventories. Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with APB 20 "Accounting Changes", the correction of an error is retroactively reflected as a prior period adjustment. Under Peruvian GAAP, such corrections are reflected in the current year statement of income as a cumulative charge. Accordingly, a corresponding adjustment for this different treatment, as well as that resulting from the difference of the amounts capitalized due to the difference disclosed in ii) below, are reflected in the income statement and equity reconciliations from U.S. GAAP to Peruvian GAAP.

      3. Fixed assets -
      4. There are certain differencedifferences in the accounting treatment of fixed assets under U.S. GAAP financial statements presented and Peruvian GAAP. These differences include the types of costs capitalized and depreciation and amortization periods and are summarized as follows:

        (a) Under U.S. GAAP, certain project supervision costs and contractor costs associated with the acquisition of assets are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over the life of the project. Under Peruvian GAAP, project supervision costs are capitalized as intangible assets and amortized in one year and contractor cost associated with the acquisition of fixed assets are expensed as incurred.

        (b) Under U.S. GAAP mine development costs are capitalized as tangible assets and amortized using the units-of-production method. For Peruvian GAAP, beginning in 2002, mine development costs are capitalized as intangibles and amortized using the units-of-production method. Until December 31, 2001, such costs wereare capitalized and amortized in one year.

        (c) Under U.S. GAAP, cost of leach pads are amortized using the straight-line method over five years. For Peruvian GAAP, cost of leach pads are amortized using the units-of-production method.

      5. Debt issuance costs -
      6. Under U.S. GAAP certain permissible debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related debt. Under Peruvian GAAP, all debt issuance costs were charged to expense as incurred.

      7. Deferred income tax -

    In accordance with U.S. GAAP, under SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", which designates the asset and liability method as the accounting method for taxes, Yanacochathe Company recognizes certain temporary differences between the financial reporting basis of the Company's liabilities and assets anand the related tax basis. Under Peruvian GAAP, income tax is determined in accordance with applicable legal regulations and assets and/or liabilities for temporary differences relating to income taxes are recognized. In the case of the Company, the income tax items included in the reconciliation provided below originated substantially by the Peruvian GAAP reconciliation items.

  • Workers' profit sharing -

  • Under U.S. GAAP, the Company recognizes a liability for temporary differences between book and tax income relating to workers profit sharing, similar to that recognized relating to income taxes.taxes which is classified as a component of costs applicable to sales.

    Under Peruvian GAAP, workers share in the profits of Yanacocha corresponds to 8% of taxable income. Assets and/or liabilities for temporary differences relating to profit sharing are recognized; therefore, the profit sharing items included in the reconciliation below, is originated substantially by the Peruvian GAAP reconciliation items.

  • Revenue recognition -

  • Under U.S. GAAP, the Company recognizes revenue when the price is determinable and upon delivery and transfer of title of gold to the customer. In addition, revenues from silver sales are credited to costs applicable to sales as a by-product credit. Under Peruvian GAAP, revenue, including gold and silver, is recognized, net of transportation and refining costs, when doreore is delivered to the shipper.

    Reconciliation between Net Income and Partners' Equity determined under U.S.GAAPU.S. GAAP and PERUVIANPeruvian GAAP

    The following is a summary of the adjustments to net income for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 and to partners' equity as of December 31, 20032005 and 20022004 which would be required if Peruvian GAAP had been applied instead of U.S. GAAP in the financial statements:

    Year ended December 31,

    Year ended December 31,

    2004

    2003

    2002

    2005

    2004

    2003

     

    Net income according to the financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP

    $ 390,304

    $ 320,412

    $ 197,922

     

    Restatement of financial statements Prepared under U.S.GAAP:

     

     

    Restatement of financial statements Prepared under U.S. GAAP:

     

     

     

    Net income, U.S. GAAP

    $ 525,474

    $ 390,304

    $ 320,412

    Items increasing (decreasing) reported net income:

     

    i) Capitalization of depreciation charges as a component of inventories

    23,102

    (39,476 )

    17,227

    (8,232 )

    23,102

    (39,476 )

    ii) Different depreciation rates and fixed assets charged to expenses

    38,996

    43,167

    (8,413 )

    46,188

    38,996

    43,167

    iii) Debt issuance costs

    623

    838

    408

    623

    838

    ii) Capitalized compensation

    676

    iv) Deferred income tax

    (13,527 )

    (16,741 )

    4,183

    (24,697 )

    (13,527 )

    (16,741 )

    v) Deferred workers' profit sharing

    (3,219 )

    (4,613 )

    1,165

    (4,697 )

    (3,219 )

    (4,613 )

    vi) Revenue recognition

    (8,980 )

    8,880

    7,249

    1,485

    (8,980 )

    8,880

    vii) Other

    (453 )

    676

    676

    Net adjustment

    37,671

    (7,269 )

    22,925

    10,002

    37,671

    (7,269 )

     

    Net income in accordance with Peruvian GAAP

    $ 427,975

    $ 313,143

    $ 220,847

    Net income, Peruvian GAAP

    $ 535,476

    $ 427,975

    $ 313,143

    At December 31,

    2004

    2003

    Partners' equity according to the financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP

    $ 811,174

    $ 700,870

    Items increasing (decreasing) reported partners' equity:

    i) Capitalization of depreciation charges in inventories

    (18,584 )

    (41,686 )

    ii) Different depreciation rates and fixed assets charged to expenses

    (96,188 )

    (135,184 )

    iii) Debt issuance costs

    (817 )

    (1,440 )

    ii) Capitalized compensation

    (1,352 )

    (2,028 )

    iv) Deferred income tax

    30,032

    43,559

    v) Deferred workers' profit sharing

    9,407

    12,626

    vi) Revenue recognition

    1,531

    10,511

    Net adjustment

    (75,971 )

    (113,642)

    Partners' equity according to the financial statements prepared under Peruvian GAAP

    $ 735,203

    $ 587,228

     

    At December 31,

     

    2005

    2004

     

     

     

    Partners' equity, U.S. GAAP

    $ 1,156,648

    $ 811,174

    Items increasing (decreasing) reported partners' equity:

     

     

    i) Capitalization of depreciation charges in inventories

    (26,816 )

    (18,584 )

    ii) Different depreciation rates and fixed assets charged to expenses

    (50,000 )

    (96,188 )

    iii) Debt issuance costs

    (409 )

    (817 )

    iv) Deferred income tax

    5,335

    30,032

    v) Deferred workers' profit sharing

    4,710

    9,407

    vi) Revenue recognition

    3,016

    1,531

    vii) Other

    (1,805 )

    (1,352 )

    Net adjustment

    (65,969 )

    (75,971 )

     

     

     

    Partners' equity, Peruvian GAAP

    $ 1,090,679

    $ 735,203

    In connection with the differences between USU.S. GAAP and Peruvian GAAP in the classification of certain line items in the balance sheets and the statements of profit and loss, the following significant captions would have been presented under Peruvian GAAP:

     

    At December 31,

     

    2004

    2003

     

     

     

    Balance sheets

     

     

    Current assets

    $ 231,762

    $ 227,656

    Total assets

    $ 1,091,571

    $ 974,630

    Total liabilities

    $ 356,369

    $ 387,402

     

    At December 31,

     

    2005

    2004

    Balance sheets

     

     

    Current assets

    $ 460,994

    $ 231,762

    Total assets

    $ 1,465,891

    $ 1,091,571

    Total liabilities

    $ 375,212

    $ 356,369

     

    Year ended December 31,

     

    2004

    2003

    2002

     

     

     

     

    Statement of profit and loss

     

     

     

    Revenues

    $ 1,265,321

    $ 1,059,427

    $ 720,647

    Income before workers' profit sharing and income tax

    $ 659,662

    $ 487,472

    $ 303,446

    Exhibit 4.1

     

    Year ended December 31,

     

    2005

    2004

    2003

    Statement of profit and loss

     

     

     

    Revenues

    $ 1,524,518

    $ 1,265,321

    $ 1,059,427

    Income before workers' profit sharing and income tax

    $ 852,316

    $ 659,662

    $ 487,472

     

    PARTICIPATIONSHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT

    among

    SMM CERRO VERDE NETHERLANDS B.V.
    (a Dutch corporation)

    SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO., LTD.
    (a Japanese corporation),

    SUMITOMO CORPORATION
    (a Japanese corporation),

    SUMMIT GLOBAL MANAGEMENT B.V.
    (a Dutch corporation),

    COMPAÑIA DE MINAS BUENAVENTURA S.A.A.
    (a Peruvian sociedad anónima abierta),

    CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS COMPANY
    (a Delaware corporation)

    PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION

    (a New York corporation),

    CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY
    (a Delaware corporation),

    CYPRUSMETALS COMPANY
    (aDelaware corporation),

    CYPRUSCLIMAX METALS COMPANY
    (a Delaware corporation),

    and

    SOCIEDAD MINERA CERRO VERDE S.A.A.

    (a Peruvian sociedad anónima abierta)

    Dated as of March 16,June 1, 2005

    1.Definitions1.Definitions*

    2.General Capital Increase and Special Dividend2.Board of Directors.*

    2.1.Authorization of General Capital Increase and Special Dividend2.1 Management Duties*

    2.2.Conduct of General Capital Increase*

    2.3.Initial Sale and Purchase of Preemptive Rights; First Round*

    2.4.Second Round*

    2.5.Reallocation of Capital Increase Shares*

    2.6.Final Allocation2.2 Members*

    3.Waiver of Distribution Rights.3.Actions at the First*

    4.Programs and Final ClosingsBudgets.*

    5.Accounting.*

    3.1.Actions at the First Closing5.1 Books and Records*

    5.2 Unaudited Financial Statements3.2.Actions at or Prior to the Final Closing*

    5.3 Audit*

    5.4 Fiscal Year*

    4.Cost6.Operation of the Mines and any Project.*

    6.1 Operation4.1.Expenses Incurred in Connection with the Preparation*

    6.2 Secondment of the Transaction DocumentsSumitomo Participant Personnel*

    6.3 No Concentrate Leaching Facility.*

    5.Representations7.Concentrate Purchase by the Sumitomo Participant and the PD Participant.*

    5.1.Representations Regarding Cerro Verde7.1 Sumitomo Participant's Right to Purchase Pro Rata Share*

    5.2.Representations Regarding PDC7.2 Consideration of Additional Concentrate or other Product Sales to the Sumitomo Participant*

    5.3.Representations Regarding7.3 Consideration of Sales to the PD Participant*

    5.4.Representations Regarding SC and SMM*

    5.5.Representations Regarding SGM and the Sumitomo Participant*

    5.6.Representations Regarding BVN*

    8.Operating Levels6.Covenants*

    9.Transfers of Interests; Rights of First Refusal.*

    6.1.No Sale of Interest in the Participants9.1 General Prohibition*

    6.2.Permitted9.2 Permitted Encumbrances*

    6.3.Beneficial Ownership of PDC Common Stock9.3 Sales by Minority Participants*

    6.4.Covenants Regarding9.4 Sales by the SumitomoPD Participant*

    6.5.Actions to Cause Closing, etc.9.5 Compliance with Peruvian Tender Offer Rules*

    6.6.Transfers9.6 Separate Sales of InterestsSubordinated Debt by the PD Participant*

    6.7.Competition; Business Opportunities9.7 Substitution of Participant*

    6.8.Conduct of Business until Final Closing9.8 Transfer Restriction Extension*

    6.9.Opinions9.9 Company Disclaimer of CounselTransfer Restrictions*

    7.Conditions to Closing10.Issuances of Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt.*

    7.1.Conditions to Obligations10.1 Issuance of SMM, SC, SGM and the Sumitomo ParticipantEquity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt for Project Completion*

    7.2.Conditions to Obligations10.2 Additional Issuance of Cerro Verde, the PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant*

    7.3.Consequences of Failure to Satisfy Conditions to ClosingEquity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt*

    8.Termination11.Competition; Business Opportunities; Standstill; Transactions with Affiliates and Other Arrangements.*

    8.1.Event of Termination11.1 Competition; Business Opportunities*

    8.2.Effect of Termination11.2 Standstill*

    8.3.Indemnification11.3 Transactions with Affiliates*

    11.4 Use of Proceeds8.4.Indemnification Procedures*

    11.5 Status Reports*

    11.6 Approval of Minutes*

    11.7 Virtual Meetings*

    11.8 Estatutos*

    11.9 Sulfide Project*

    11.10 Registration of this Agreement*

    11.11 Support of Senior Project Debt*

    11.12 Covenants of PDC, SMM, SC and SGM*

    9.Use12.Confidentiality; Conflicts of InformationInterest.*

    13.Miscellaneous.*

    9.1.Confidentiality13.1 Implied Covenants*

    9.2.Conflict of Interest*

    10.Miscellaneous*

    10.1.Notices13.2 Notices*

    10.2.Entire13.3 Entire Agreement*

    10.3.Waiver, etc.13.4 Amendments, Waivers, etc*

    10.4.Severability13.5 No Other Arrangements or Agreements*

    10.5.Governing Law13.6 Severability*

    10.6.Arbitration13.7 Governing Law*

    10.7.Binding Effect13.8 Arbitration*

    10.8.Headings13.9 Binding Effect*

    10.9.Counterparts13.10 Headings*

    13.11 Counterparts10.10.Assignability*

    13.12 Supermajority Voting*

    13.13 Conflicts with Estatutos or Peruvian Law*

    Exhibit List

    Exhibit 1 Dividend Distribution Policy

    Exhibit 2 New Cerro Verde Estatutos (Spanish and English)

    Exhibit 3 Form of Shareholders Agreement

    Schedule List

    Schedule A Mining Concessions

    Schedule 5.1(c)(ii) Compliance with Other Instruments and Laws

    Schedule 5.1(c)(iii) Government Authorizations, Permits and Licenses

    Schedule 5.1(d) Environmental Matters

    Schedule 5.1(e) Taxes

    Schedule 5.1(f) Labor Matters

    Schedule 5.1(g)(ii) Legal Proceedings; Competing Claims

    Schedule 5.1(i) Financial Statements

    Schedule 5.1(l) Absence of Changes and Events

    Schedule 5.1(m) Title to Assets, Mining and Beneficiation Concessions and Other Rights

    Schedule 5.1(n) Related Party Transactions and Commitments

    PARTICIPATIONSHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT, dated as ofMarch 16, June 1, 2005, amongSUMITOMOamong SMM CERRO VERDE NETHERLANDS B.V., a Dutch corporation (the "Sumitomo Participant"), SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO.,LTD., a Japanese corporation ("SMM"),SUMITOMO CORPORATION,, a Japanese corporation ("SC"),SUMMIT GLOBAL MANAGEMENT B.V., aDutcha Dutch corporation ("SGM"), CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation (the "PD Participant"), PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, a New York corporation ("PDC"), COMPAÑIA DE MINAS BUENAVENTURA S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anónima abierta ("BVN"), PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, aNew Yorkcorporation ("PDC"),CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY, aDelawarecorporation ("CAMC"), CYPRUS METALS COMPANY, aDelawarecorporation ("CMC"), CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("CCMC" or the "PD Participant") and SOCIEDAD MINERA CERRO VERDE S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anónima abierta ("(the "Cerro VerdeCompany"). Undefined capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Participation Agreement defined below.

    WITNESSETH:

    WHEREAS, Cerro Verde currently has 227,309,099 shares of common voting stock, par value U.S.$0.5409 per share ("Common Stock"), outstanding (the "Current Outstanding Shares");

    WHEREAS, the boardSumitomo Participant, the PD Participant and BVN, together with certain other entities, are parties to a Participation Agreement, dated as of directors of Cerro VerdeMarch 16, 2005 (the "Board") has approved the development of a primary sulfide ore body beneath the oxide ore body located within the mining concessions owned by Cerro Verde identified in Schedule A hereto, which shall be processed into copper concentrate as a final product at new facilities that are to be developed generally as described in the Cerro Verde Primary Sulfide Feasibility Study, dated May 2004, prepared by Fluor Canada Ltd., as modified by the Project Update, dated September 2004 (the "Feasibility StudyParticipation Agreement"), with such changes to such facilities as the Board determines, in its good faith reasonable judgment, to be necessary or advisable and which do not substantially alter the basic nature and scope of such facilities (the "Sulfide Project");

    WHEREAS, in connection with obtaining the financing necessary to implement the Sulfide Project, Cerro Verde is contemplating (i) an equity financing in the form of a general capital increase (the "General Capital Increase") involving the issuance of 122,746,913 additional shares of Common Stock (the "Capital Increase Shares") at the Per Share Price (as defined below) to be consummated after the closing conditions set forth in section 7.1 of this Agreement, as such conditions may have been modified or waived byproviding for the Sumitomo Participant (the "Capital Increase Closing Conditions"), have been satisfied or waived; and (ii) debt financingsBVN to finance the development and completion of the Sulfide Project and to provide an appropriate amount of working capital for the operation of the Sulfide Project;

    WHEREAS, in connection with the General Capital Increase, each Holder of Record on the date set by the shareholders of Cerro Verde at the Shareholders Meeting (as defined below) will receive preemptive rights ("Preemptive Rights") to subscribe for up to a number ofacquire Capital Increase Shares equal to such shareholder's Respective Share (as defined below) multiplied by the aggregate number of Capital Increase Shares;

    WHEREAS, BVN owns 20,833,367 Current Outstanding Shares, which represent approximately 9.2% of the Current Outstanding Shares (the "Current BVN Shares"), and believes it is in the best interests of Cerro Verde to develop the Sulfide Project and to engage Minera Phelps Dodge del Perú S.A.C., a Peruvian sociedad anónima cerrada and indirect subsidiary of PDC ("MPDP"), to assist such development and serve as the Operator on terms and conditions to be set forth in an operator's agreement that shall be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Cerro Verde, MPDP, SMM, SC and BVN (the "Operator's Agreement");

    WHEREAS, BVN and the other parties hereto wish for BVN to increase its equity investment in Cerro Verde to up to 20.1% of the Common Stock by participating in the General Capital IncreaseIncrease;

    WHEREAS, the Participation Agreement contemplates that the execution and delivery of this Agreement will occur on the terms and conditions contemplated herein;

    WHEREAS,SC owns 100%Closing Date of the outstanding shares of capital stock of SGM,General Capital Increase; and as of the First Closing Date, SMM will own 80% of the outstanding capital stock of the Sumitomo Participant, SGM will own 20% of the outstanding capital stock of the Sumitomo Participant and the Sumitomo Parties wish to make an investment in Cerro Verde with the understanding that MPDP, an indirect subsidiary of PDC, will serve as Operator on the terms and conditions set forth in the Operator's Agreement;

    WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to provide for certain matters relating to the Sumitomo Participant to make an equity investmentgovernance and ownership of up to 24.99%shares of the Common Stock by participating in the General Capital Increase on the terms and conditions contemplated herein;Company;

    WHEREAS, SMM and Cerro Verde wish to arrange a ten-year concentrate sales agreement, which shall be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Cerro Verde and SMM, under which SMM would agree to purchase each year up to 50% of all copper concentrates produced by the Sulfide Project, including copper concentrates produced by third parties under any toll agreements providing for the treatment of ore mined by Cerro Verde (the "SMMConcentrate Agreement");

    WHEREAS, PDC owns 100% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of CAMC; CAMC owns 100% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of CMC; CMC owns 100% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the PD Participant; and the PD Participant owns 187,500,306 Current Outstanding Shares, which represent approximately 82.5% of the Current Outstanding Shares; and

    WHEREAS, subject to the consummation of the General Capital Increase on the Final Closing Date (as defined below), Cerro Verde intends to pay the Special Dividend (as defined below) on such date to the Holders of Record of Current Outstanding Shares;

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1. Definitions. The following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings:
      2. .

        AAA:AAA: the meaning given in section 10.6(b) of this Agreement.13.8(c).

        Acceptance Notice: the meaning given in section 10.2.

        Additional Participant: any Person which becomes a party to this Agreement and a Participant in accordance with the provisions of section 9 or section 10.

        Adjusted Respective Share: for any Participant, the percentage interest of such Participant in the total number of shares of Common Stock held by the Participants from time to time.

        Affiliate: with respect to a particularany Person, any Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with such Person.

        Agreement: this ParticipationShareholders Agreement, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time.

        Board:Board: the meaning given inboard of directors of the second recital of this Agreement.Company.

        BusinessDay:Business Day: any day other than (i) a Saturday, Sunday, national holiday in the United States, the Netherlands or the Republic of Peru orPeru; (ii) a day on which either state or national banking institutions in the State of Arizona or the State of New York or banking institutions in the Netherlands or the Republic of Peru are not open for the conduct of normal banking business; or (iii) a day on which the BVL is not open for the conduct of business.

        BVL: Bolsa de Valores de Lima.

        BVN: Compañía De Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anónima abierta.

        BVN First Round Rights: the meaning given in section 2.3(c)(i) of this Agreement.

        BVN Shares: the Capital Increase Shares that BVN has agreed to acquire on the Final Closing Date pursuant to this Agreement.

        BVN Shortfall: the meaning given in section 2.5(a)(i) of this Agreement.

        Call Exercise Notices: the meaning given in section 2.5(b)(ii) of this Agreement.

        CAMC: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, a Delaware corporation.

        Capital Increase Closing Conditions: the meaning given in the third recitalfirst paragraph of this Agreement.

        Capital Increase Shares:Expenditure: any expenditure or commitment which would be capitalized or the meaning givenexpense of which would be deferred in the third recital of this Agreement.accordance with accrual basis accounting principles generally accepted in Peru.

        CAVALI: Caja de Valores y Liquidaciones de Lima ICLV S.A.

        CCMC: Cyprus Climax Metals Company, a Delaware corporation.

        Cerro Verde: Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anónima abierta.

        Claimant: the meaning given in section 10.6(b) of this Agreement.13.8(b).

        Closing Conditions:Common Stock: common voting stock, par value U.S.$0.5409 per share, of the meaning given in section 7.1 of this Agreement.Company.

        CMC: Cyprus Metals Company, a Delaware corporation.

        Committed Capital Increase Shares: with respect to any Person, Capital Increase Shares that such Person has committed to purchase by validly exercising a Preemptive Right in the General Capital Increase.

        Common Stock:Company: the meaning given in the first recitalparagraph of this Agreement.

        CONASEV: Comisión Nacional Supervisora de Empresas y Valores.

        ConfidentialInformation:Completion Funding Notice: the meaning given in section 9.1 of this Agreement.10.1.

        Current BVN Shares: the meaning given in the fifth recital of this Agreement.

        Current Outstanding Shares: the meaning given in the first recital of this Agreement.

        Damages:Confidential Information: the meaning given in section 8.3(a)12(a).

        Defendant: the meaning given in section 10.6(b) of this Agreement.13.8(b).

        Direct Claim Notice:Delivery and Processing Expenses: any cost or expense, determined on an accrual basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Peru, related to the transportation, handling, insurance or processing of Products by the Company after such Products have been loaded on board ship at the port of embarkation from Peru or, if delivery is within Peru, after the purchaser of such Products has assumed the risk of loss.

        Electing Participants: the meaning given in section 8.4(b) of this Agreement.10.2.

        El Peruano: the Peruvian official gazette published daily by Editora Peru, a private company fully owned and controlled by the Peruvian government.

        Excess Sumitomo Participant Shares: the meaning given in section 2.5(a)(ii) of this Agreement.Equity Securities: Shares or warrants, options or other rights to acquire Shares or any other securities (debt or otherwise) convertible into or exercisable for Shares.

        Feasibility Study: the meaning given in the second recital of this Agreement.

        Final Allocation: the meaning given in section 2.6 of this Agreement.

        Final Closing: the meaning given in section 3.2 of this Agreement.

        Final ClosingDate:the meaning given in section 3.2 of this Agreement.

        Financial Statements: the meaning given in section 5.1(i) of this Agreement.

        First Closing: the meaning given in section 3.1 of this Agreement.

        First Closing Date: the meaning given in section 3.1 of this Agreement.

        First Round: the meaning given in section 2.3(a) of this Agreement.

        First Round Trading Period: the meaning given in section 2.3(a) of this Agreement.

        Full Completion: final completion of theCerro Verde Primary Sulfide ProjectFeasibility Study, dated May 2004, prepared by Fluor Canada, Ltd., as set forth inmodified by the Project Debt Agreements.

        Fully Diluted Respective Share: with respect to any holder of Common Stock or Preemptive Rights, the percentage interest of such holder in the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that will be outstanding immediately after the Final Closing.Update, dated September 2004.

        General Capital Increase: the meaning given in the thirdfourth recital of thisthe Participation Agreement.

        Holder of Record: a Participant or Person registered with CAVALI as an owner of Current Outstanding Shares on any Record Date.

        Indemnitee:Issuance Notice: the meaning given in section 8.410.2.

        Mines: the mines existing as of thisthe date hereof and located within the mining concessions owned by the Company identified in Exhibit 11 to the Participation Agreement.

        Indemnitor:Offer Consideration Period: the meaning given in section 8.4 of this Agreement.9.3(a).

        Liability Threshold Amount:Offering Participant: the meaning given in section 8.3(a) of this Agreement.9.3(a).

        Material Adverse Effect:Operating Expense: any changeoperating cost or effect that is materially adverse to (a) the financial condition, properties, assets, business or results of operations of Cerro Verde taken as a wholeor (b) the ability of Cerro Verde to achieve Full Completion of the Sulfide Project;provided, that any adverse changeexpense determined on an accrual basis in or effect resulting from (i) regulatory, economic or political conditions (including acts of war, declared or undeclared, armed hostilities and terrorism)accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Peru having general applicationother than any depreciation, depletion, amortization or other charge with respect to costs or expenses capitalized or deferred in accordance with such accounting principles and effectother than any cost or expense related to the transportation, handling, insurance or processing of Products after such Products have been loaded on board ship at the mining industryport of embarkation from Peru or, generally inif delivery is within Peru, (ii) Peruvian or international financial or securitiesmarkets or prevailing interest rates, (iii) international market pricesafter the purchaser of copper generally, or (ivsuch Products has assumed the announcementrisk of this Agreement or any Other Transaction Document or the consummation ofthe transactions contemplated in the Transaction Documents or in the Project Debt Agreements,shall not constitute a Material Adverse Effect.

        MPDP: Minera Phelps Dodge del Perú S.A.C., a Peruvian sociedad anónima cerrada.

        New Cerro Verde Estatutos: the meaning given in section 2.1(c)(v) of this Agreement.loss.

        Operator: Minera Phelps Dodge del Perú S.A.C., a Peruvian sociedad anónima cerrada and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of PDC, which shall act as operator pursuant to the Operator's Agreement, or any entity which shall replace such corporation as operatoroperator.

        Operator's Agreement: the Operator's Agreement between the Company and Minera Phelps Dodge del Perú S.A.C., dated the date hereof, as amended from time to time, or any substitution therefor pursuant to the terms thereof.

        Operator's Agreement:Participant Nominees: the meaning given in the fifth recital of this Agreement.section 11.6.

        Other Transaction Documents: the Shareholders Agreement, the SMM Concentrate Agreement and the Operator's Agreement.

        Participants: the PD Participant, the Sumitomo Participant, BVN and any Person which becomes a party to theShareholders Agreementand a participant in accordance with the provisions of section 9 or 10 of theShareholders Agreement.Additional Participant.

        PDC:Phelps Dodge Corporation, aNew Yorkcorporation.

        PD Closing Conditions:Participation Agreement: the meaning given in section 2.1(c)(vii)(E).the first recital.

        PDC: Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York corporation.

        PD Mining: Phelps Dodge Mining Company, a division of PDC.

        PD Participant: Cyprus Climax Metals Company, a Delaware corporation.

        PD Participant Parents: PDC, CAMC and CMC.

        PD Participant Shortfall: the meaning given in section 2.5(a)(iv)the first paragraph of this Agreement.

        PD Reallocation Call Options: the meaning given in section 2.5(b)(ii) of this Agreement.

        PD Reallocation Shares: the meaning given in section 2.5(b)(i) of this Agreement.

        Per Share Price: U.S.$3.6074 per share of Common Stock.

        Person: any individual, corporation, partnership, association, public body, governmental authority or other entity.

        PeruvianGAAP: accounting principles generally accepted inthe Republic of Peru.

        Preemptive Right:Post-Tender Maximum Purchase Amount: the meaning given in the fourth recital of this Agreement.section 9.5(a)(iv).

        Preemptive Right Certificate:Offering Participant: the meaning given in section 9.3(b).

        Preemptive Rights: the fourth recitalmeaning given in section 9.3(a).

        Products: any copper concentrates, copper precipitates or electrowon copper cathode, molybdenum and any other marketable mineral products including gold and silver, produced by the Company (including at the Sulfide Project) and any copper or other products produced for the Company by others under any toll agreements providing for the treatment of this Agreement.production from the Mines or any Project.

        Project: any project commenced after the date hereof relating to the exploration or exploitation of any of the mining concessions and other mining and exploration rights of the Company (including without limitation, the Sulfide Project) and any other rights or liabilities thereafter acquired or assumed by the Company relating thereto.

        Project Capacity: the aggregate of (i) the actual capability of the Company's concentrator to process copper, molybdenum, silver and gold bearing material generated in Company operations, (ii) the actual capability of the Company's precipitation facilities to process solutions generated in Company operations, (iii) the actual capacity of any Company solvent extraction electrowinning plant(s) to process solutions generated in Company operations, and (iv) the actual capability of any other facility hereafter operated by the Company to process mineral bearing material generated in Company operations; in each case on a substantially continuous basis assuming shutdowns for normal scheduled maintenance and the absence of any uncontrollable circumstance.

        Project Debt: all indebtedness, including but not limited to Senior Project Debt Agreements: the definitive agreements providing for indebtednessand Subordinated Debt, for money borrowed or incurred by Cerro Verdethe Company to finance the development and completion of the Sulfideany Project and to provide an appropriate amount of working capital for the operation of the Sulfidesuch Project.

        Qualified Directors:Project Debt Agreements: the definitive agreements providing for the Project Debt.

        Purchaser: the meaning given in the New Cerro Verde Estatutos.section 10.1.

        Record Date: a date set by Cerro Verde's shareholders at a shareholders meeting or, upon appropriate delegation of authority, by Cerro Verde's Board of Directors,Purchasing Participant: the meaning given in accordance with applicable Peruvian law, to determine which shareholders will be entitled to the benefit of a specified corporate action.section 9.5.

        RespectiveShare: with respect toPWC: PricewaterhouseCoopers.

        Respective Share: for any holder of Common Stock,Participant, the percentage interest of such holderParticipant in the total number of shares of Common Stock in the aggregate number of Current Outstanding Shares.outstanding from time to time.

        SC:Sale Acceptance Notice: the meaning given in section 9.3(a).

        SC: Sumitomo Corporation,, a Japanese corporation.

        Second Round:Senior Project Debt: financing for the meaning givendevelopment, completion and operation of any Project that ranks in section 2.4(a)respect of this Agreement.payment and upon liquidation senior to the Subordinated Debt.

        Second Round Distribution:Senior Project Debt Agreements: the meaning given in section 2.4(a) of this Agreement.definitive agreements providing for the Senior Project Debt.

        Second Round Preemptive Rights:Senior Project Lenders: the meaning given in section 2.4(a) of this Agreement.lenders which become parties to the Senior Project Debt Agreements.

        SGM: Summit Global Management B.V., a Dutch corporation.

        ShareholdersAgreement: a shareholders agreement substantiallyShares: shares of capital stock in the form of Exhibit 3.Company.

        Shareholders Meeting: the meaning given in section 2.1(a) of this Agreement.

        Six Month LIBOR Rate: the rate per annum equal to (i) the rate per annum (rounded upward to the nearest whole multiple of 1/32 of 1% per annum) appearing on Moneyline Telerate Markets Page 3750 (or any successor page) as the London interbank offered rate for deposits in U.S. dollars at approximately 11:00 A.M. (London time) on June 28, 2005 for a six-month term, minus (ii) 50 basis points.

        SMM:Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Ltd., a Japanese corporation.

        SMMConcentrateSMM Concentrate Agreement: the concentrate sales agreement between the Company and SMM dated the date hereof.

        Sponsor Finance Company: any wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, subsidiary of PDC, BVN or the Sumitomo Participant Parents which holds notes evidencing Subordinated Debt.

        Stability Agreement: the Agreement for Investment Promotion Measures and Guarantees, dated February 13, 1998, between the Company and the Government of Peru acting through the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

        Subject Offering Participant: the meaning given in section 9.5(iii).

        Subject Securities: the meaning given in section 9.5(i).

        Subordinated Debt: indebtedness of the Company (including but not limited to indebtedness owing to Sponsor Finance Companies, the Participants or their respective Affiliates) that ranks upon liquidation junior to the Senior Project Debt and ranks in respect of payment junior and is subordinated to the Senior Project Debt in a manner satisfactory to the holders of the Senior Project Debt.

        Sulfide Project: the project to develop a primary sulfide ore body beneath the oxide ore body located within the mining concessions owned by Cerro Verde identified in Exhibit 11 to the Participation Agreement, which shall be processed into copper concentrate as a final product at new facilities that are to be developed generally as described in the Feasibility Study, with such changes to such facilities as the Board determines, in its good faith reasonable judgment, to be necessary or advisable and which do not substantially alter the basic nature and scope of such facilities.

        Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements: the meaning given in section 11.11.

        Sumitomo Participant: the meaning given in the ninth recital of this Agreement.

        Special Board Meeting: the meaning given in section 2.1(a) of this Agreement.

        Special Dividend: an amount, which shall be determined by the Board prior to the Final Closing Date and, subject to the consummation of the General Capital Increase on the Final Closing Date, paid on the Final Closing Date to Holders of Record of Current Outstanding Shares, equal to the sum of (a) U.S.$45.0 millionplus (b) an amount equal to the product of (i) the total number of pounds of copper cathode produced by Cerro Verde between April 30, 2004 and the Final Closing Date, and (ii) the difference between the average copper cathode price per pound between April 30, 2004 and the Final Closing Date and U.S.$0.90 per pound;provided, that in any case, the Special Dividend shall be reduced by an amount that the Board in its discretion may deem to be required to ensure that on the Final Closing Date the sum of (x) Cerro Verde's net working capital, plus (y) costs incurred in connection with the Sulf ide Project that should be classified under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States as construction in progress, shall be no less than U.S.$40.0 million and in no event shall the aggregate amount of the Special Dividend exceed the amount of distributable earnings approved by the shareholders of Cerro Verde in accordance with applicable law.

        Stability Agreement: the meaning given in section 5.1(o) of this Agreement.

        Subsidiary: with respect to any Person (the "Parent"), any other Person (other than a natural person), whether incorporated or unincorporated, of which at least a majority of the securities or ownership interests having by their terms ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the board of directors or other persons performing similar functions is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by the Parent or by one or more of its respective Subsidiaries.

        Sulfide Project: the meaning given in the second recitalfirst paragraph of this Agreement.

        Sumitomo First Round Rights:Participant Parents: SCHN, SMM and SC.

        Tender Offer: the meaning given in section 2.3(c)(i) of this Agreement.9.5.

        Sumitomo Participant:SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands B.V., a Dutch corporation.

        Sumitomo Participant Parents: SGM, SMM and SC.

        Sumitomo Participant Shortfall:Ultimate Parent: the meaning given in section 2.5(a)(iii) of this Agreement.

        Sumitomo Parties: the meaning given in section 6.9(b) of this Agreement.

        Sumitomo Shares: the Capital Increase Shares that the Sumitomo Participant has agreed to acquire on the Final Closing Date pursuant to this Agreement.

        Taxes: the meaning given in section 2.1(c)(vii)(E) of this Agreement.

        Third Party Claim Notice: the meaning given in section 8.4(a) of this Agreement.

        Transaction Documents: this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement, the SMM Concentrate Agreement and the Operator's Agreement.

        Unsubscribed Shares: the meaning given in section 2.1(c)(vii)(A) of this Agreement.9.2.

      3. Board of Directors.General Capital Increase and Special Dividend
      4. .

          1. Management Duties. Except for such matters as shall be reserved for shareholders of the Company by Peruvian law, the business of the Company shall be managed under the direction of the Board. In this connection, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Board shall (i) control and supervise the Operator and the activities of the employees, independent contractors and agents of the Operator used in connection with theMines and any Project, (ii) consider and approve any toll agreements under which the Company would produce products for others, (iii) consider and approve the annual programs and budgets of the Company and any intermediate or long-term plans of the Company, and amendments thereto, (iv) recommend the financial statements of the Company to be approved by the shareholders of the Company at the annual meeting of shareholders, (v) recommend the independent auditors for the Company, who shall be selected by the shareholders of the Company at the annual meeting of shareholders, and (vi) authorize such actions as it may deem necessary or appropriate in connection with, and discuss other matters of importance relating to, the Company.
          2. Members. At any time that the shareholders of the Company are permitted by Peruvian law to nominate individuals for election as members of the Board, the PD Participant shall nominate three director candidates and two deputy director candidates for each such director candidate, the Sumitomo Participant shall nominate one director candidate and two deputy director candidates for such director candidate, and BVN shall nominate one director candidate and two deputy director candidates for such director candidate;provided that in the event t hat the Sumitomo Participant or BVN owns a Respective Share of less than 16.67% and more than 12.51% and the size of the Board is expanded to seven members as contemplated by Article 34 of the estatutos of the Company or otherwise, the PD Participant shall nominate up to five director candidates and two deputy director candidates for each such director candidate, the Sumitomo Participant shall nominate one director candidate and two deputy director candidates for such director candidate and BVN shall nominate one director candidate and two deputy director candidates for such director candidate;providedfurther, that in the event that the Sumitomo Participant or BVN owns a Respective Share of less than 12.51% and more than 10.01% and the size of the Board is expanded to nine members as contemplated by Article 34 of the estatutos of the Company or otherwise, the PD Participant shall nominate up to seven director candidates and two deputy director candidates for each such director candidate, the Sumitomo Participant shall nominate one director candidate and two deputy director candidates for such director candidate and BVN shall nominate one director candidate and two deputy director candidates for such director candidate;providedfurther, that if the Board is expanded to nine members as contemplated by Article 34 of the estatutos of the Company or otherwise, whichever of the Sumitomo Participant and BVN owns a larger Representative Share may, if the PD Participant agrees that it owns a sufficient number of shares to cause the election of two directors, nominate up to two director candidates and two deputy director candidates for each such director candidate. At each election, each of the PD Participant, the Sumitomo Participant and BVN shall cast all of its votes for its respective nominees to the Board. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that a purpose of this section 2.2 is to enable each of the Sumitomo Participant and BVN to elect at least one member of the Board as lo ng as it holds a Respective Share of at least 10.01%.
      5. AuthorizationWaiver of General Capital Increase and Special DividendDistribution Rights.
      6. .

        1. Promptly, and in any event within two Business DaysEach of the date hereof, Cerro VerdePD Participant, BVN and the Sumitomo Participant hereby waives its rights under Article 231 of the Peruvian Corporate Law (Law. No. 26887).

        2. Programs and Budgets.
        3. Not later than March 31 of each year, the Board shall callmeet to consider and approve, with or without modification, a specialprogram and budget for the Company for the current year and any intermediate or long-term plans for periods in excess of one year. The program and budget and any such intermediate or long-term plans shall be furnished with the agenda for the meeting at which they are to be considered. The annual program and budget shall include, on a quarterly basis:

              1. specified operating levels and itemized estimates of Products to be produced;
              2. an itemized budget specifying, separately, estimated revenues, Operating Expenses, Delivery and Processing Expenses and Capital Expenditures of the Company;
              3. the details of any development or capital programs; and
              4. such other matters as may be determined from time to time by the Board.

          The members of the Board shall be furnished with a monthly breakdown of the foregoing matters for the remainder of the then current year on or prior to March 1 of each year. Any program and budget approved by the Board or monthly breakdown thereof may be revised, supplemented or amended from time to time by the Board. Any proposed revision, supplement or amendment shall be furnished with the agenda for the meeting (the "at which it is to be considered.

        4. SpecialAccounting.
            1. Books and Records. The Company shall keep or cause to be kept books and records, in each case in accordance with accounting practices generally accepted in Peru, so as accurately to record all receipts of funds from or for the account of the Company and disbursements thereof and all Operating Expenses, Delivery and Processing Expenses and Capital Expenditures incurred by the Company. All books and records maintained pursuant to this section shall be open to the inspection and examination of, or made available to, the directors, office rs, accountants, consultants or representatives of any Participant at the locations where such books, records and information are kept in the ordinary course of business at such reasonable times as may be specified in reasonable prior written notice to the Company.
            2. Unaudited Financial Statements. The unaudited annual financial statements shall be prepared and delivered to the Board Meeting")on or before February 15 of each year. The unaudited quarterly financial statements shall be prepared and delivered to authorize,the Board within 45 days of the end of each fiscal quarter.
            3. Audit. The annual financial statements of the Company shall be examined and certified by the firm of PWC or such other accounting firm of international standing selected from time to time by the shareholders of the Company at the annual meeting of shareholders. The audited financial statements shall be prepared and delivered to the Board within sixty (60) days of the end of the fiscal year of the Company. The Board shall recommend that the shareholders of Cerro Verdethe Company approve, the General Capital Increase and the Special Dividend at the annual or an extraordinary meeting of shareholders (the "Shareholders Meeting").
            4. The agenda for the Special Board Meeting shall include all items necessary or advisable to authorize the General Capital Increase and the Special Dividend, including without limitation:
              1. the approval of Cerro Verde financial statements that demonstrate the existence of an amount of distributable earnings (as defined under Peruvian law) at least equal to the amount of the then-anticipated Special Dividend and the approval of a resolution of the Board recommending such financial statements for approval at the Shareholders Meeting;
              2. the approval of a resolution of the Board recommending approval at the Shareholders Meeting of (x) the General Capital Increase, and (y) the Special Dividend, including approving plans of distribution and all other terms and conditions required by Peruvian law;
              3. the calling of the Shareholders Meeting; and
              4. the authorization of the Managers and other officers of Cerro Verde to take all other action required by law, or otherwise advisable, with respect to the Special Dividend, the General Capital Increase and any other actions contemplated by this section 2.1, including without limitation, making all notices and disclosure to CONASEV and BVL necessary to effect the General Capital Increase (including the distribution of the Preemptive Rights pursuant to section 2.3(a)) and the Special Dividend.
            5. Promptly after, and in any event within two Business Days of, the authorization of the General Capital Increase and the Special Dividend at the Special Board Meeting, Cerro Verde shall take all action necessary to call the Shareholders Meeting for the purpose of:
              1. approving the financial statements recommended by the Board pursuant to section 2.1(b)(i);
              2. affirming the dividend distribution policy approved by the shareholders on December 12, 2003, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1;
              3. approving the terms of the General Capital Increase, including the determination of the Record Date, the procedures for the issuance of Preemptive Rights and all other terms and conditions required by Peruvian law;
              4. approving the Special Dividend, including approving plans of distribution and all other terms and conditions required by Peruvian law;
              5. adopting, subject to the consummation of the General Capital Increase on the Final Closing Date and determination by the Board of the capital share amounts in Article 6 and the definition of "Closing Date" in Article 1 pursuant to the delegation of authority set forth in (vii)(D) below, the Spanish version of the amended and restated estatutos substantially in the form of Exhibit 2 hereto (the "New Cerro Verde Estatutos") in accordance with applicable Peruvian law;
              6. approving the Operator's Agreement; and
              7. delegating to the Board the authority to:
                1. sell and/or place, in its discretion, any unsubscribed Capital Increase Shares remaining after the conclusion of the Second Round ("Unsubscribed Shares") to any third party, including without limitation, any purchaser of Capital Increase Shares or any holder of Preemptive Rights in accordance with section 2.6 of this Agreement;
                2. determine the terms, conditions and procedures for the sale and/or placement of such Unsubscribed Shares in accordance with section 2.6 of this Agreement;
                3. determine the procedures for the payment for the Committed Capital Increase Shares and Unsubscribed Shares, including the date of such payment and the issuance of provisional share certificates regarding such Shares;
                4. with respect to the New Cerro Verde Estatutos, (i) determine the information necessary to finalize the capital share amounts in Article 6 and the definition of "Closing Date" in Article 1, and (ii) declare the New Cerro Verde Estatutos valid and in full force and effect upon consummation of the General Capital Increase on the Final Closing Date;
                5. if, (i) the Sumitomo Participant delivers written notice to the Board on the Final Closing Date in its good faith and reasonable judgment stating that the Capital Increase Closing Conditions have not been satisfied or waived as of such date, (ii) the Board determines on or prior to the Final Closing Date that the conditions set forth in section 7.2 hereof (the "PD Closing Conditions") have not been satisfied or waived as of such date, or (iii) unless otherwise agreed by the Sumitomo Participant, the Final Closing shall not have occurred by September 30, 2005, cancel the Special Dividend and the General Capital Increase and cause Cerro Verde to return promptly to each applicable subscriber or purchaser (x) the aggregate Per Share Price in United States dollars, or any other amount of consideration, paid by such subscriber or purchaser to Cerro Verde in connection with the exercise of Preemptive Rights regarding the Capital Increase Shares or the purchase of Unsubscribed Shares, plus (y) interest, calculated at a rate per annum equal to the Six Month LIBOR Rate, on such aggregate Per Share Price for the period commencing on June 30, 2005 and ending on the day before such aggregate Per Share Price is returned;provided that with respect to subscribers and purchasers who otherwise would have acquired a Fully Diluted Respective Share that exceeds five percent, such return shall be made in immediately available funds by wire transfer to an account designated by each applicable subscriber or purchaser, in each case without deduction for any present or future taxes, tax withholding, levies, imposts, duties or similar charges imposed by the Republic of Peru or any local taxing authority therein (collectively, "Taxes"); and
                6. determine the amount of the Special Dividend;provided that if (x) the amount of the distributable earnings reflected in the financial statements approved by the Special Board Meeting pursuant to section 2.1(b)(i) and by the Shareholders Meeting pursuant to section 2.1(c)(i) is less than the amount of the Special Dividend and (y)annually, audited financial statements of Cerro Verde for periods after the periods covered by the previously approved financial statements (the "Subsequent Financial Statements") reflect additional distributable earnings, the Board shall (1) recommend that the shareholders approve all Subsequent Financial Statements that reflect such additional distributable earningsCompany, showing, separately, revenues, Operating Expenses, Delivery and (Processing Expenses and Capital Expenditures.
                7. 2Fiscal Year) call an extraordinary meeting. The fiscal year of the shareholders, toCompany shall be held prior to the Final Closing Date, to approve such Subsequent Financial Statements.calendar year.
            6. At the Shareholders Meeting, each of the PD Participant and BVN shall vote its Current Outstanding Shares in favor of all resolutions necessary to approve the General Capital Increase, the Special Dividend and all other matters described in section 2.1(c) above.
          1. ConductOperation of the Mines and any Project.
              1. Operation. Minera Phelps Dodge del Perú S.A.C., an indirect subsidiary of PDC, shall act as General Capital IncreaseManager of the Company and shall provide Outsourced Services (as defined in the Operator's Agreement) to the Company pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Operator's Agreement. Pursuant to such Operator's Agreement, the Operator shall appoint a Representative (as defined in the Operator's Agreement) and Unit Managers (as defined in the Operator's Agreement) to perform Management Services (as defined in the Operato r's Agreement) and shall hire and maintain such technical and other personnel contemplated by theOutsourcing Plan(as defined in the Operator's Agreement) submitted to the Board and necessary to provide theOutsourced Services (as defined in the Operator's Agreement). Substantially all of the personnel involved in the day-to-day operation of the Mines and any Project, including without limitation, the exploration, mining, milling, leaching, crushing, grinding, transportation, accounting and administrative activities of the Company (other than the Operator's Personnel), shall be employed directly by the Company, but shall be subject to the direction of the Operator in its capacity as General Manager. Except as set forth in section 6.2, neither the Operator nor the Company shall be obligated to employ any representative of the Sumitomo Participant or BVN. Representatives of the Sumitomo Participant, BVN, and their respective Affiliates, however, s hall have the right at any time, at their own expense and risk and upon reasonable advance written notice to the Operator, to observe the Sulfide Project's construction, development and operation and the Company's other operations and to inspect the Company's premises, books and records during usual business hours.
              2. Secondment of Sumitomo Participant Personnel. The PD Participant shall cause either the Company or the Operator to, and either the Company or the Operator shall, employ, at all times and for reasonable compensation, two individuals designated by the Sumitomo Participant and approved by the Operator, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. While so employed, such individuals shall be subject to the supervision of the Operator.
              3. No Concentrate Leaching Facility.
                1. Cerro Verde shall not construct, own or operate a copper concentrate leaching facility or similar facility designed to produce copper from copper concentrate.
                2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, PDC or any of its Affiliates (other than Cerro Verde) may construct, own or operate copper concentrate leaching facilities and, subject to section 11.3 of this Agreement and Articles 41(i) and 41(g) of the estatutos of the Company, Cerro Verde may enter into agreements or other arrangements of any type with PDC or any of its Affiliates regarding any such facilities;provided that Cerro Verde shall give prior written notice to the Sumitomo Participant of any sale, lease (as lessor) or other disposition by Cerro Verde ofany mining concessions, beneficiation concessions, easements or water rights in connection with such copper concentrate leaching facility.
          2. Concentrate Purchase by the Sumitomo Participant and the PD Participant.
              1. Sumitomo Participant's Right to Purchase Pro Rata Share. Cerro Verde acknowledges that, subject to the terms and conditions of the SMM Concentrate Agreement, it has agreed to sell to SMM and any Affiliate designated by it, and SMM has agreed to purchase from Cerro Verde, 50% of the copper concentrates produced by Cerro Verde for a term of ten years;provided that if the Sumitomo Participant fails to provide funding for any new Project involving production of copper concentrates or any expansion of Project Capacity at the Sulfid e Project as contemplated in any Completion Funding Notice or Issuance Notice, such production amount for purposes of this calculation shall exclude increases in production resulting from such new Project or expansion of Project Capacity. After the termination of the SMM Concentrate Sales Agreement, the Sumitomo Participant (and any Affiliate it designates which is acceptable to the Company, including SMM, which the Company hereby agrees is an acceptable designated Affiliate) shall purchase from the Company, each year an amount of the Company's concentrate equal to: (a) the estimated total production for such year for (i) the Sulfide Project and (ii) so long as the Sumitomo Participant has provided its share of funding for any Project involving production of copper concentrates or any expansion of Project Capacity at the Sulfide Project as contemplated in the applicable Completion Funding Notice or Issuance Notice, any such new Project or expansion of the Project Capacity at the Sulfide Project, in each case as reflected in the Company's internal budgets and plans multiplied by (b) the Sumitomo Participant's Respective Share at the date on which the contract for such sale and purchase is entered into. The contracts for such transactions shall be in the form then being used by the Company for international concentrate sale arrangements of similar duration. The term of each such contract shall be designated by the Company but shall be at least one year and not more than ten years. Such contracts shall contain arms'-length market provisions calculated so as reasonably to reflect the then current market for the sale of copper concentrate having similar characteristics in comparable international transactions under agreements of similar duration, and to facilitate the assignment of such contracts to lenders to the Company. If by the expiration date of any such contract, the Company and the Sumitomo Participant shall not have reached agreement on the terms and provision s of a successor contract, then the issues in dispute shall be submitted by the parties to arbitration pursuant to section 13.8 of this Agreement. Pending the issuance of the arbitrators' decision, the parties shall continue to sell and purchase concentrate on the same basis as provided for in the expired contract. Upon issuance of the arbitrators' decision, such decision shall be given effect retroactively to the expiration date of such contract. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that following the termination of the SMM Concentrate Sales Agreement the Sumitomo Participant or any Affiliate participates as a purchaser in concentrate sale arrangements tied to import credit financing being provided to the Company, the amount of Company concentrate which the Company shall be required to sell and the Sumitomo Participant shall be required to purchase pursuant to this section 7.1 shall be reduced by the aggregate amount of concentrate covered by such concentrate sale arrangement (including the portion being purchased by parties other than the Sumitomo Participant or its Affiliate).
              2. Consideration of Additional Concentrate or other Product Sales to the Sumitomo Participant. In the event that the Sumitomo Participant wishes to purchase on an arm's-length market basis more concentrate than it is entitled to purchase under section 7.1. above or any other Product, the Company will consider in good faith any offers from the Sumitomo Participant to purchase such additional concentrate or other Product. In connection with its consideration of any such offers to purchase additional concentrate or other Product, the Company inte nds to deal with the Sumitomo Participant on a basis consistent with that on which the Company deals with other prospective third-party purchasers.
              3. Consideration of Sales to the PD Participant. In the event that the PD Participant (or any Affiliate it designates which is acceptable to the Company) wishes to purchase on an arm's-length market basis Company Product, the Company will consider in good faith any offers from the PD Participant (or such Affiliate) to purchase such Product. In connection with its consideration of any such offers to purchase Product, the Company intends to deal with the PD Participant on a basis consistent with that on which the Company deals with other prospective third party purchasers. If the Company elects to sell such Product to the PD Participant (or such Affiliate), the contracts for such transactions shall be in the form then being used by the Company for international sale arrangements of similar duration, provided that contracts for the sale of such Product for delivery to the United States shall, if applicable, include price provisions that are based upon COMEX or LME quotations and account for any excess expense or savings, as the case may be, arising from the difference in charges for shipment of such Product to U.S. Gulf Coast ports and charges for shipping such Product to Japanese main ports by in effect fully passing along such excess expense or savings, as the case may be, to the purchaser. The term of each such contract shall be designated by the Company but shall be at least one year and not more than ten years. Such contracts shall contain arm's length market provisions (including, if applicable, price provisions that are based upon COMEX or LME quo tations and account for relative freight charges for sales to the United States) calculated so as reasonably to reflect the then current market for the sale of such Product having similar characteristics in comparable international transactions under agreements of similar duration, and, if applicable, to facilitate the assignment of such contracts to lenders to the Company. The terms and conditions of such contracts shall be no more favorable, nor any less favorable, than the terms and conditions of the Company's sale contract with SMM or the Sumitomo Participant, if any, then in effect for such Product except that, if applicable, the PD Participant's or its designated Affiliate's contract shall provide for price provisions that are based upon COMEX or LME quotations and account for relative freight charges for sales to the United States.
          3. Operating Levels.
          4. Operating levels shall be determined by the Board. The Board shall have the right, for any cause or reason, (a) to reduce or increase the level of any Company operation or to shut down any such operation altogether, or (b) to start up any such operation that may be shut down.

          5. Transfers of Interests; Rights of First Refusal.

              1. Promptly upon approvalGeneral Prohibition. Except as permitted by or provided for in this Agreement, as required pursuant to the Project Debt Agreements or in a transaction involving only one or more of its Affiliates, no Participant shall sell, assign, convey or otherwise dispose of, or directly or indirectly mortgage, pledge or otherwise create or suffer to exist a lien, charge or other encumbrance or security interest in any of its Equity Securities or Subordinated Debt that it or any Affiliate (including any Sponsor Finance Company) holds. Each Partici pant shall cause any of its Affiliates (including any Sponsor Finance Company) that holds any Subordinated Debt not to sell, assign, convey or otherwise dispose of, or directly or indirectly mortgage, pledge or otherwise create or suffer to exist a lien, charge or other encumbrance or security interest in any Subordinated Debt except as permitted by or provided for in this Agreement or as required pursuant to the Project Debt Agreements. Any sale, assignment, conveyance or other disposition, mortgage, lien, charge, encumbrance, or security interest permitted by or provided for in this Agreement shall be made in accordance with applicable law and with any applicable provisions of the General Capital IncreaseProject Debt Agreements.
              2. Permitted Encumbrances. Each Participant that is ultimately controlled by another Person (such person being the "Ultimate Parent") may grant or permit to exist any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge or encumbrance on, or other security interest in any of its Equity Securities or Subordinated Debt that it or any Affiliate (including any Sponsor Finance Company) holds, but only to secure any obligation so long as the performance of each such obligation has been and continues to be irrevocably guaranteed to the obligee by the Ultimate Parent of such Participant (for the avoidance of doubt, as of the date hereof, only the PD Participant and the Special Dividend atSumitomo Participant have an Ultimate Parent, PDC in the Shareholders Meeting, Cerro Verde will preparecase of the PD Participant, SC and fileSMM in the case of the Sumitomo Participant).
              3. Sales by Minority Participants.Joint Sales of Equity Securities and Subordinated Debt. Should any Participant (other than the PD Participant) wish to sell any of its Equity Securities (other than preemptive rights or certificates representing preemptive rights issued by the Company in connection with CONASEVa general capital increase under Article 53 of the estatutos of the Company or otherwise ("Preemptive Rights")), Subordinated Debt that it or any Affiliate (including any Sponsor Finance Company) holds and its corresponding rights und er this Agreement (the "Offering Participant") it must first obtain a bona fide offer for all such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and rights and give to each of the BVL all disclosure required by Peruvian law regardingother Participants written notice identifying the offeree and describing the price and each of the terms and conditions of such bona fide offer and offering to sell all such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and rights to all such Participants at the General Capital Increasesame price and on the same terms and conditions. If none of the Participants accepts such offer in writing within 45 days of such notice (such 45-day period, the "Offer Consideration Period"), then the Offering Participant shall be free to sell all such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and rights to such offeree at such price and on such terms at any time within six months of the last day of the Offer Consideration Period. If one Participant accepts such offer in writing (such acceptance, a "Sale Acceptance Notice"), within the Offer Consideration Period, then such P articipant and the Special Dividend. Immediately thereafter, Cerro Verde will beginOffering Participant shall consummate such transaction, subject to section 9.5, as promptly as is reasonably practicable but in any event not more than six months after the distributiondate of such acceptance. If more than one Participant submits a Sale Acceptance Notice within the Offer Consideration Period, then each such accepting Participant shall purchase, subject to section 9.5, a pro rata portion of such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and rights determined in proportion to their Adjusted Respective Shares. No such Sale Acceptance Notice shall be effective unless it applies to all such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and rights offered by the Offering Participant.
                1. Should any Participant (other than the PD Participant) wish to sell any Preemptive Rights (a "Preemptive Right Offering Participant") to be granted pursuant to a general capital increase of the Company, it must first obtain a bona fide offer for all such Preemptive Rights pursuantand give to each of the other Participants written notice identifying the offeree and describing the price and each of the terms and conditions of such bona fide offer at least ten days prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law, and offering to sell all such Preemptive Rights to all such Participants at the same price and on the same terms and conditions.
                  1. If none of the Participants submits a Sale Acceptance Notice within seven days of the notice identifying the offeree, then the Preemptive Right Offering Participant shall be free to sell such Preemptive Rights to such offeree at such price and on such terms prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law.
                  2. If one of the Participants submits a Sale Acceptance Notice within seven days of the notice identifying the offeree, then such Participant and the Preemptive Right Offering Participant shall consummate such transaction, subject to section 2.3(a).9.5, as promptly as is reasonably practicable prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law. If more than one Participant submits a Sale Acceptance Notice within such seven-day period, then each of such accepting Participants shall, subject to section 9.5, so purchase a pro rata portion of such Preemptive Rights determined in proportion to their Adjusted Respective Shares prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law.
                  3. Cerro VerdeNo acceptance of an offer in clause (i) or (ii) above shall conductbe effective unless it applies to all such Preemptive Rights offered by the General Capital IncreasePreemptive Right Offering Participant.
                  4. In the event that the duration of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law changes subsequent to the date hereof, the Participants shall adjust the advance notice and acceptance requirements set forth in accordancethis section 9.3(b) in a manner that reflects and is consistent with allsuch changes and achieves substantially similar economic results as the terms set forth herein on the date hereof.
                2. Separate Sales of Equity Securities and Subordinated Debt. Any Participant (other than the PD Participant) may sell its Equity Securities or Subordinated Debt separately and to different offerees,provided that (i) such sale complies with the requirements of section 9.3(a) and, if applicable, Peruvian laws9.5 hereof, and regulations, including without limitation(ii) with respect to any separate sale of Subordinated Debt, such sale is discussed in good faith with the rules of CONASEV and BVL.other Participants prior to such sale.
              4. Initial SaleSales by the PD Participant.Should the PD Participant wish to sell any of its Equity Securities (other than Preemptive Rights), Subordinated Debt that it or any Affiliate (including any Sponsor Finance Company) holds and Purchase of Preemptive Rights; First Round
              5. .

                1. After filing the disclosure contemplated by section 2.2(a), Cerro Verde will commence the General Capital Increase by issuingits corresponding rights under this Agreement, it must first obtain a bona fide offer for all such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and rights and give to each of its Holders of Record Preemptive Rights in book entry form representing the right to purchase up to a number of Capital Increase Shares equal to such stockholder's Respective Share multiplied byother Participants written notice identifying the aggregate number of Capital Increase Shares. Such Preemptive Rights shall be tradable for a period of 15 Business Days from,offeree and exercisable for a period of 17 Business Days from, but excludingdescribing the date of issuance (such 15 Business Day Period being the "First Round Trading Period"price and such 17 Business Day period being the "First Round").
                2. Upon commencement of the General Capital Increase, Cerro Verde shall issue Preemptive Rights regarding 101,250,165 Capital Increase Shares to the PD Participant and Preemptive Rights regarding 11,250,018 Capital Increase Shares to BVN, and Preemptive Rights regarding, in the aggregate, 10,246,730 Capital Increase Shares to all other Holders of Record.
                3. Promptly after receipt of the Preemptive Rights contemplated in section 2.3(b), and at any date and time selected by the PD Participant prior to the end of the First Round Trading Period, the PD Participant shall simultaneously (1) assign and transfer directly to the Sumitomo Participant through a stock broker selected by the PD Participant, which is currently expected to be Credibolsa Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A., and the Sumitomo Participant shall acquire from the PD Participant directly through such stock broker, 73,511,763 Preemptive Rights (the "Sumitomo First Round Rights") and (2) assign and transfer directly to BVN through a stock broker selected by the PD Participant, which is currently expected to be Credibolsa Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A., and BVN shall acquire from the PD Participant directly through such stock broker, 27,738,402 Preemptive Rights (such Preemptive Rights, together with Preemptive Rights regarding the 11,250,01 8 Capital Increase Shares BVN receives directly from Cerro Verde pursuant to the transaction contemplated in section 2.3(b), the "BVN First Round Rights").
                  1. The PD Participant shall be solely responsible for paying any taxes, broker fees or commissions incurred in connection with the assignments and transfers referred to in clause (i) above.
                4. Immediately prior to the end of the First Round, BVN shall exercise the BVN First Round Rights and, if the Closing Conditions have been satisfied or waived by the Sumitomo Participant, the Sumitomo Participant shall exercise the Sumitomo First Round Rights, in accordance with the terms of the Preemptive Rights, pursuant to which the Sumitomo Participant and BVN each shall pay to Cerro Verde the Per Share Price for each Committed Capital Increase Share issuable upon exercise of the Sumitomo First Round Rights and the BVN First Round Rights, respectively, in immediately available funds by wire transfer to an account designated by Cerro Verde.
                5. Except as contemplated in this section 2.3, (i) neither the PD Participant nor the Sumitomo Participant shall, directly or indirectly, sell, transfer, assign, acquire or exercise any Current Outstanding Shares or Preemptive Rights during the First Round; and (ii) BVN shall not, directly or indirectly, sell, transfer, assign or acquire any Current Outstanding Shares, or acquire or exercise Preemptive Rights to the extent that it would result in it acquiring, or having the opportunity to acquire through the exercise of Preemptive Rights, a Fully Diluted Respective Share of greater than 20.1%, during the First Round.
              6. Second Round
              7. .

                1. After the conclusion of the First Round, Cerro Verde shall, in accordance with applicable Peruvian law, recognize preemptive rights to subscribe for a pro-rata portion of the Capital Increase Shares that were not subscribed for during the First Round (the "Second Round Preemptive Rights") and distribute such Second Round Preemptive Rights to each Person that exercised Preemptive Rights during the First Round on a pro-rata basis determined in accordance with Peruvian law. Such Second Round Preemptive Rights shall be tradable for a period of three calendar days from, and exercisable for a period of four calendar days from, but excluding the date of issuance (such four calendar day period being the "Second Round").
                2. Second Round Preemptive Rights may be exercised on or prior to the end of the Second Round in accordance with the terms of the Second Round Preemptive Rights. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, holders of Second Round Preemptive Rights shall pay to Cerro Verde the Per Share Price for each Committed Capital Increase Share issuable upon exercise of their respective Second Round Preemptive Rights in immediately available funds by wire transfer to an account designated by Cerro Verde.
                3. Neither the PD Participant nor the Sumitomo Participant shall, directly or indirectly, sell, transfer, assign, acquire or exercise any Current Outstanding Shares or Preemptive Rights during the Second Round. BVN shall not, directly or indirectly, sell, transfer, assign or acquire any Current Outstanding Shares, or acquire or exercise Preemptive Rights to the extent that it would result in it acquiring, or having the opportunity to acquire through the exercise of Preemptive Rights, a Fully Diluted Respective Share of greater than 20.1%, during the Second Round.
              8. Reallocation of Capital Increase Shares
              9. .

                1. Promptly after the conclusion of each of the Second Roundterms and with respectconditions of such bona fide offer an d offering to clauses (ii)sell all such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and (iv) below,rights to all such Participants at the Final Allocation, Cerro Verde shall determine whether, based upon the actual exercise of Preemptive Rights in the General Capital Increasesame price and assuming that all Committed Capital Increase Shares will be fully paid on the Final Closing Date:
                  1. BVN would havesame terms and conditions. If none of the Participants submits a Fully Diluted Respective Share of less than 20.1% (the number of Capital Increase Shares accounting for such shortfall are referred to asSale Acceptance Notice during the "BVN Shortfall");
                  2. the Sumitomo Participant would have a Fully Diluted Respective Share that exceeds 24.99% (the number of Capital Increase Shares accounting for such excess are referred to as the "Excess Sumitomo Participant Shares");
                  3. the Sumitomo Participant would have a Fully Diluted Respective Share of less than 24.99% (the number of Capital Increase Shares accounting for such shortfall are referred to as the "Sumitomo Participant Shortfall"); and
                  4. the PD Participant would have a Fully Diluted Respective Share of less than 53.56% (a "PD Participant Shortfall").
                2. If Cerro Verde determines pursuant to section 2.5(a) that a PD Participant Shortfall exists, it shall immediately notify BVN, the PD Participant and the Sumitomo Participant of such determination and the number of Committed Capital Increase Shares BVN and the Sumitomo Participant shall be required to sell to the PD Participant to cure such Shortfall (the "PD Reallocation Shares");provided, thatOffer Consideration Period, then the PD Participant shall be solely responsible for payingfree to sell all such Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and rights to such offeree at such price and on such terms at any taxes, broker fees or commissions incurred in connection with such sale.
                  1. Each of BVN and the Sumitomo Participant hereby grant to the PD Participant an option to purchase such PD Reallocation Shares, if any, on the Final Closing Date at a price per share equal to the Per Share Price (the "PD Reallocation Call Options"). The PD Reallocation Call Options shall be registered in the Cerro Verde share registry. Upon receipttime within six months of the last day of such Offer Consideration Period. If one Participant accepts such offer in writing within 45 days of such notice, contemplated in section 2.5(b)(i), the PD Participant may exercise each PD Reallocation Call Option by delivering written requests (the "Call Exercise Notices") to BVN and the Sumitomo Participant exercising the PD Reallocation Call Options.
                  2. On the Final Closing Date, immediately after the consummation of the Final Closing and receipt of a Call Exercise Notice, BVN and the Sumitomo Participant shall sell to the PD Participant, at the Per Share Price and in the manner specified in the Call Exercise Notice, the applicable number of PD Reallocation Shares set forth in the applicable Call Exercise Notice. If the PD Participant would have a Fully Diluted Respective Share of less than 50%, BVN, the Sumitomothen such Participant and the PD Participant will cooperateshall consummate such transaction, subject to section 9.5, as promptly as is reasonably practicable but in any event not more than six months after the date of such acceptance. If more than one Participant accepts such offer in writing within such Offer Consideration Period, then each such accepting Participant shall purchase, subject to section 9.5, a pro rata portion of such Equity Securities, Subordina ted Debt and userights determined in proportion to their best effortsAdjusted Respective Shares. No such acceptance shall be effective unless it applies to obtain an express exemption from CONASEV from the obligation to completeall such sale through a public tender offer procedure (Oferta Pública de Adquisición - OPA). Should CONASEV require the PD Participant to acquire such PD Reallocation Shares through such public tender offer procedure, BVNEquity Securities, Subordinated Debt and the Sumitomo Participant agree to (i) participate in such public tender offer launchedrights offered by the PD Participant; (ii) tender the applicable, and not more than the applicable, number of PD Reallocation Shares set forth in the applicable Call Exercise Notice; and (iii) refrain from tendering any other shares in addition to the number of PD Reallocation Shares set forth in the applicable Call Exercise Notice.
                  3. The PD Participant shall indemnify and hold harmless each of the Sumitomo Participant and BVN, from and against any tax incurred or paid by the Sumitomo Participant or BVN, as the case may be, in connection with the sale of the PD Reallocation Shares.
                3. If, after consummation of the transaction contemplated in section 2.5(b) above, the Sumitomo Participant would continue to hold any Excess Sumitomo Participant Shares, or if Cerro Verde determines pursuant to section 2.5(a) that the Sumitomo Participant would hold Excess Sumitomo Participant Shares immediately after the consummation of the Final Closing, the Sumitomo Participant shall sell on the BVL such Excess Sumitomo Participant Shares on the Final Closing Date immediately after the consummation of the Final Closing.
                4. BVN, the PD Participant, and the Sumitomo Participant shall cooperate in all respects with the transactions described in this section 2.5. Each party hereto shall execute and deliver such certificates and other documents as may be reasonably requested by the other parties in order to consummate or implement the transactions contemplated in this section 2.5.
              10. Participant.Final Allocation
              11. . If, after the conclusion of the Second Round, Cerro Verde determines (i) pursuant to section 2.5(a) that there would be a BVN Shortfall and/or a Sumitomo Participant Shortfall and (ii) that there are Unsubscribed Shares, upon the approval of the Board, Cerro Verde shall, to the extent available and on terms and conditions determined by the Board take the following action on the Final Closing Date:

                1. offer to BVN at the Per Share Price, a number of Unsubscribed Shares such that, if BVN purchased such Unsubscribed Shares, BVN would have a Fully Diluted Respective Share of not greater than 20.1%;
                2. if BVN fails to purchase 100% of such Unsubscribed Shares after the offer contemplated in section 2.6(a), offer to the Sumitomo Participant at the Per Share Price, and the Sumitomo Participant shall, if the Closing Conditions have been satisfied or waived by the Sumitomo Participant, purchase a number of Unsubscribed Shares such that, if the Sumitomo Participant purchased such Unsubscribed Shares, the Sumitomo Participant would have a Fully Diluted Respective Share of not greater than 24.99%; and
                3. if any Unsubscribed Shares remain unsold after the transactions contemplated in sections 2.6(a) and (b) above, offer to the PD Participant at the Per Share Price such remaining Unsubscribed Shares (the actions in clauses (a), (b) and (c) are the "Final Allocation").

              If any Unsubscribed Shares remain outstanding after the Final Allocation, Cerro Verde may in its discretion, offer to one or more third parties, any remaining Unsubscribed Shares on terms and conditions determined by the Board.

            1. Actions at the First and Final Closings
            2. .

              1. Actions at the First Closing
              2. . The following transactions shall take place at the offices of Rodrigo, Elias & Medrano, Av. San Felipe 758, Lima, Peru on the date (the "First Closing Date") that the Sumitomo Participant exercises the Sumitomo First Round Rights (the "First Closing"):

                1. The Sumitomo Participant shall pay to Cerro Verde, in immediately available funds by wire transfer, the Per Share Price with respect to the Sumitomo First Round Rights, as required by the terms of the Preemptive Right Certificates; and
                2. BVN shall pay to Cerro Verde, in immediately available funds by wire transfer, the Per Share Price with respect to the BVN First Round Rights, as required by the terms of the Preemptive Right Certificates.
              3. Actions at or Prior to the Final Closing
              4. . On

                1. Should the PD Participant wish to sell any Preemptive Rights to be granted pursuant to a general capital increase of the Company, it must first obtain a bona fide offer for all such Preemptive Rights and give to each of the other Participants written notice identifying the offeree and describing the price and each of the terms and conditions of such bona fide offer at least ten days prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law, and offering to sell all such Preemptive Rights to all such Participants at the same price and on the same terms and conditions.
                  1. If none of the Participants submits a Sale Acceptance Notice within seven days of the notice identifying the offeree, then the Preemptive Right Offering Participant shall be free to sell such Preemptive Rights to such offeree at such price and on such terms prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law.
                  2. If one of the Participants submits a Sale Acceptance Notice within seven days of the notice identifying the offeree, then such Participant and the Preemptive Right Offering Participant shall consummate such transaction, subject to section 9.5, as promptly as is reasonably practicable prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law. If more than one Participant submits a Sale Acceptance Notice within such seven-day period, then each of such accepting Participants shall, subject to section 9.5, so purchase a pro rata portion of such Preemptive Rights determined in proportion to their Adjusted Respective Shares prior to the termination of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law.
                  3. No acceptance of an offer in clause (i) or (ii) above shall be effective unless it applies to all such Preemptive Rights offered by the Preemptive Right Offering Participant.
                  4. In the event that the duration of the first round of subscription required under Peruvian law changes subsequent to the date determinedhereof, the Participants shall adjust the advance notice and acceptance requirements set forth in this section 9.4(b) in a manner that reflects and is consistent with such changes and achieves substantially similar economic results as the terms set forth herein on the date hereof.
              5. Compliance with Peruvian Tender Offer Rules.To the extent that a purchase by the Board acting pursuant to the delegation of authority contemplated in section 2.1(c)(vii) or, in the absence of such delegation, the shareholders of Cerro Verdea Participant which has delivered a Sale Acceptance Notice in accordance with section 9.3 or 9.4 (a "Purchasing Participant") of Equity Securities or Preemptive Rights would result in such Purchasing Participant being required, under applicable Peruvian law (the "or regulations, to make any such purchase pursuant to a public tender offer or similar process ("Final Closing DateTender Offer"), then:
              6. (i) the purchases of such Equity Securities or Preemptive Rights, as the case may be, the purchase of which would be subject to the Tender Offer requirement (the "Subject Securities") shall be made in accordance with this section 9.5 in lieu of section 9.3 or 9.4, as the case may be;

                (ii) the Purchasing Participant shall implement and launch a Tender Offer for a number of Equity Securities or Preemptive Rights, as the case may be, equal to the number of the Subject Securities or such higher number as may be required under applicable Peruvian law or regulations, at a price, and on the terms and conditions, not less favorable to holders as those that would apply to the Subject Securities if they were being purchased under section 9.3 or 9.4;

                (iii) the Offering Participant or Preemptive Right Offering Participant, as the case may be (the "Subject Offering Participant"), shall tender in the Tender Offer the Subject Securities;

                (iv) to the extent permitted under Peruvian law, the Subject Offering Participant shall reimburse the Purchasing Participant to the extent that the Purchasing Participant purchases Subject Securities in the Tender Offer at a price that is greater than the price that would apply to the Subject Securities if they were being purchased under section 9.3 or 9.4;

                (v) to the extent that the Purchasing Participant purchases in the Tender Offer less than 100% of the Subject Securities from the Subject Offering Participant, the Purchasing Participant shall, from time to time, as promptly as possible, and to the extent permitted, under applicable Peruvian law and regulations, purchase Subject Securities from the Subject Offering Participant, at a price, and on the terms and conditions, that would apply to the Subject Securities if they were being purchased under section 9.3 or 9.4, until such time as such Purchasing Participant shall have purchased 100% of the Subject Securities; and

                (vi) no Participant other than the Subject Offering Participant shall tender any Equity Securities or Preemptive Rights in the Tender Offer;

              7. Separate Sales of Subordinated Debt by the PD Participant. The PD Participant may sell its Equity Securities or Subordinated Debt separately and to different offerees, provided that (i) such sale complies with the requirements of section 9.4 and, if applicable, section 9.5 hereof, and (ii) with respect to any separate sale of Subordinated Debt, such sale is discussed in good faith with BVN and the Sumitomo Participant shall (x) determine in its good faith and reasonable judgment whether the Capital Increase Closing Conditions have been satisfied or waived and (y) evidence such determination by delivering a written notice to the Board as of such date and (ii) the Board shall determine on or prior to such sale.
              8. Substitution of Participant. No transfer of Equity Securities and the Final Closing Date whether the PD Closing Conditions have been satisfiedcorresponding rights under this Agreement pursuant to section 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, or waived as of such date. If (A) the Sumitomo Participant determines in its good faith and reasonable judgment that the Capital Increase Closing Conditions have been satisfied or waived as of such date and (B) the Board determines that the PD Closing Conditions have been satisfied or waived as of such date, the Gener al Capital Increase9.6 shall be consummated and the following transactions shall take place at the offices of Rodrigo, Elias & Medrano, Av. San Felipe 758, Lima, Peru (the "effective until (Final Closinga"):

                1. the Board, acting by unanimous written consent or at a duly convened special meeting, shall (ideclare the exact numbertransferee has delivered to the Company and all Participants a written instrument reasonably satisfactory to counsel for the Company whereby it assumes all liabilities and obligations of Capital Increase Sharesthe transferor as a Participant hereunder theretofore and thereafter incurred pursuant to be issued inthis Agreement attributable to the General Capital Increase;Equity Securities, Subordinated Debt and the corresponding rights under this Agreement transferred to it, and (iiauthorize the issuanceUltimate Parent of provisional stock certificatesthe transferee has entered into a principals agreement with the ultimate parents of the other Participants substantially in the form of sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 of the Participation Agreement, together in each case with such evidence and counsel opinions as counsel for Capital Increase Shares that have been properly subscribedsuch other Participants may reasonably request, confirming the due authorization, execution and enforceability of such instruments; and (b) the transferee has received all consents of third Persons necessary for in accordancecompliance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon such transfer becoming effective, the Preemptive Rights; (iii) authorizetransferee shall become a Participant and a party to this Agreement, the paymentRespective Share of the Special Dividend; (iv) finalize the New Cerro Verde Estatutos, including the capital share amounts in Article 6transferor shall be reduced accordingly, and the definitiontransferor shall be relieved of "Closing Date"future (but not any then existing) liabilities and obligations as a Participant hereunder attributable to the Respective Share of the transferee. A purchaser that acquires only Subordinated Debt pursuant to section 9.3, 9.4, 9.5 or 9.6 shall not become a Participant but shall execute and deliver an agreement to all Participants reasonably satisfactory to counsel for such Participants whereby such purchaser agrees that subsequent sales, if any, of Subordinated Debt held by such purchaser shall be made in Article 1 oncompliance with the Final Closing Date; and (limitations provided in this Agreement.
                2. vTransfer Restriction Extension) declare. Each of the New Cerro Verde Estatutos, as so finalized, valid and in full force and effect;
                3. PD Participant, the Sumitomo Participant and BVN shall paytake all necessary action to Cerro Verdemaintain the balancevalidity and effectiveness of the aggregate purchase price due, iftransfer restrictions in sections 9.1 through 9.7 for the maximum period permitted by Peruvian law, including without limitation, executing any agreements necessary to extend the terms of sections 9.1 through 9.7 hereof.
                4. Company Disclaimer of Transfer Restrictions. The Company is not bound by, and expressly disclaims any responsibility for enforcing, the applicable numbertransfer restrictions of Committed Capital Increase Shares subscribed for bysections 9.1 through 9.8. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of BVN, the PD Participant and the Sumitomo Participant inhereby authorizes the First Round;Company to register this Agreement and Cerro Verde shall issue toany Senior Project Debt Agreement that contains a transfer restriction with CAVALI or the Sumitomo Participant provisional stock certificates forsettlement and clearance house where the applicable number of Committed Capital Increase Shares properly subscribed for by the Sumitomo Participant in accordance with the terms of the Preemptive Rights and the procedures applicable to all participants in the General Capital Increase determined by the Board acting pursuant to the delegation of authority contemplated in section 2.1(c)(vii) (or in the absence of such delegation, the shareholders of Cerro Verde in accordance with applicable Peruvian law);
                5. BVN shall pay to Cerro Verde the balance of the aggregate purchase price due, if any, of the applicable number of Committed Capital Increase Shares subscribed for by BVN in the First Round and the Second Round, and Cerro Verde shall issue to BVN provisional stock certificates for the applicable number of Committed Capital Increase Shares properly subscribed for by BVN in accordance with the terms of the Preemptive Rights and the procedures applicable to all participants in the General Capital Increase determined by the Board acting pursuant to the delegation of authority contemplated in section 2.1(c)(vi) (or in the absence of such delegation, the shareholders of Cerro Verde in accordance with applicable Peruvian law);
                6. in addition, after consummation of the transactions contemplated in clauses (a)-(c) above, if applicable, the parties shall consummate the transactions contemplated in section 2.5 and section 2.6Common Stock is registered..
            3. Issuances of Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt.Cost
            4. .

              1. Expenses Incurred in Connection with the Preparation of the Transaction Documents

              . Each party hereto shall assume and bear all expenses, costs and fees incurred or assumed by such party or any of its Affiliates in the preparation and execution of the Transaction Documents, whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby are consummated.

            5. Representations
            6. .

              1. Representations Regarding Cerro VerdeIssuance of Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt for Project Completion. In the event the Board shall unanimously determine (and with respect to the issuance of Equity Securities, the holder or holders of a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the Company shall approve) (a) that the Company should issue Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt to finance the development, implementation or completion of a Project or (b) that additional Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt must be issued by the Company in order to permit the Company to draw down the full amount of debt available under the Senior Project Debt Agreements, the Board shall fix (and if required by Peruvian law, the holder or holders of a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the Company shall approve) the subscription price and other terms of such Equity Securities and/or, in the case of Subordinated Debt, the principal amount, interest and other terms and cause the Company to give each Participant notice of the Company's intention to issue such Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt to each Participant in an amount in proportion to its Respective Share and of the anticipated material terms thereof (such notice, the "Completion Funding Notice") at least 20 days prior to the issuance of such Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt. The terms and purchase price of the securities offered to one Participant shall be comparable to those offered to the other Participants (after taking into account the Participants' di fferent Respective Shares). Each Participant shall have the obligation pursuant to the terms of the Completion Funding Notice (i) to purchase such portion of such Equity Securities as may be necessary for such Participant to maintain its Respective Share (after giving full effect to the issuance of such Equity Securities and to any conversion or exercise right provided by such Equity Securities or any other Equity Securities previously issued) and (ii) to purchase a percentage of such Subordinated Debt equal to such Participant's Respective Share.
              2. . Cerro Verde,If any Participant shall fail to purchase, or shall purchase less than its Respective Share of such Equity Securities described above and/or Subordinated Debt, the PDCompany may (but shall not be required to) sell the Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt that such Participant and the PD Participant Parents hereby represent and warrant to each of BVN, SMM,SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant as follows:

                1. Organization, Authority, Binding Effect. Cerro Verde is a sociedad anónima abierta duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the Republic of Peru. Cerro Verde has the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and each of the Other Transaction Documents and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby; the execution and delivery of this Agreement and each of the Other Transaction Documents and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and therebywould have been entitled to purchase to any third Person or will have been duly authorizedPersons (including without limitation any other Participant) selected by all necessary corporate action on the part of Cerro Verde; this Agreement has been, and on the Final Closing Date each of the Other Transaction Documents will have been, duly executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer of Cerro Verde; and this Agreement constitutes, and on the Final Closing Date each of the Other Transaction Documents will constitute, the valid, legal and binding obligation of Cerro Verde, in each case enforceableBoard (a "Purchaser") in accordance with their respectivePeruvian law, at a closing to be held within six months of the Completion Funding Notice at such time and place as the Board may determine, on terms except thatnot materially more favorable to the Purchaser than those set forth in the Completion Funding Notice. At such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratoriumclosing, the Company shall also sell to each Participant, and similar laws affectingeach Participant shall purchase, the Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt specified in such Participant's Acceptance Notice. At such closing, (a)  each Purchaser of Equity Securities from the Company, together with the Company and all the Participants, shall execute and deliver an amendment to this Agreement whereby the Purchaser shall become a party to this Agreement entitled to all of the rights and remedies of creditors or partiessubject to executory contracts generally and by equitable principles of general applicability.
                2. Capitalization.     At the date hereof, the authorized, issued and outstanding capital stock of Cerro Verde consists solely of 227,309,099 duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock. Immediately prior to the consummationall of the transactions contemplated by section 2, the PDobligations of a Participant will have the legal right and authority to transfer its preemptive rights to the Sumitomo Participant and BVN as contemplated by this Agreement. Uponhereunder, (xb) compliance by the Sumitomo Participant with all of its obligations under this Agreement and Peruvian law regarding the General Capital Increase, (y) consummation of the General Capital Increase and the delivery of the Sumitomo Shares to the Sumitomo Participant and (z) receipt by Cerro Verde of payment therefor, good and valid title to the Sumitomo Shares, free and clear of any and all liens, claims, restrictions, encumbrances, security interests or option s (other than any created by the Sumitomo Participant or contemplated by the Shareholders Agreement) shall pass to the Sumitomo Participant. Upon (x) compliance by BVN with all of its obligations under this Agreement and Peruvian law regarding the General Capital Increase, (y) consummation of the General Capital Increase and the delivery of the BVN Shares to BVN and (z) receipt by Cerro Verde of payment therefor, good and valid title to the BVN Shares, free and clear of any and all liens, claims, restrictions, encumbrances, security interests or options (other than any created by BVN) or contemplated by the Shareholders Agreement shall pass to BVN.
                  1. As of the Final Closing Date, (A) the authorized capital stock of Cerro Verde will be 350,056,012 shares of Common Stock and the issued and outstanding capital stock of Cerro Verde will not exceed 350,056,012 duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock, (B) except as contemplated by Peruvian law, the Shareholders Agreement or the Project Debt Agreements, there will not be any shares of capital stock or other securities of Cerro Verde subject to any outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights, convertible securities or other agreements or other instruments outstanding or in effect giving any Person the right to acquire from Cerro Verde any shares of capital stock or other securities of Cerro Verde and (C) Cerro Verde will not have outstanding any bonds, debentures, notes or other obligations the holders of which have the right to vote (or convertible into or exercisable for securities having the right to vote) wit h the shareholders of Cerro Verde on any matter.
                3. Compliance with Other Instruments and Laws.
                  1. Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, or any of the Other Transaction Documents, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby will result in any violation of or be in conflict with, constitute a default under, or result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance upon any property of Cerro Verde pursuant to any provision of the organizational documents of Cerro Verde, or any agreement (other than a Project Debt Agreement), instrument, judgment, decree, order, law or regulation applicable to Cerro Verde or any of its properties, except where such violation, conflict, default or lien, charge or encumbrance, in any case or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents.
                  2. As of the date hereof, except as disclosed in Schedule 5.1(c)(ii), Cerro Verde is, and has been since March 16, 2003, in material compliance with all such provisions, agreements, instruments, judgments, decrees, orders, laws or regulations applicable to Cerro Verde or any of its properties, except to the extent that such lackrequired under Peruvian law, each Purchaser of compliance, in any case orEquity Securities, together with the requisite number of Participants as provided in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expectedCompany estatutos shall execute and deliver an amendment to result in a Material Adverse Effect or materially impairsuch estatutos to reflect the consummationnew capital structure of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents.
                  3. Except as disclosed in Schedule 5.1(c)(iii) or as would not, in any case or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, (i) Cerro Verde has obtained, and is, and has been since March 16, 2003, in compliance with all of the terms and requirements of, each governmental authorization, permit and license material to the conduct or operation of Cerro Verde's business in the manner in which it is presently conducted, ownership or use of any of its assets (including its mining and beneficiation concessions) or necessary to achieve Full Completion of the Sulfide ProjectCompany and (iicall such authorizations, permits and licenses are in full force and effect.
                4. Environmental Matters. Except as disclosed in Schedule 5.1(d) or as would not, in any case or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, Cerro Verde is, and has been since March 16, 2003, in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and hazardous or toxic substances.
                5. Taxes. Except as disclosed in Schedule 5.1(e) or as reflected or reserved against in the Financial Statements, Cerro Verde has filed or caused to be filed all tax returns required to be filed by it, and has paid all taxes shown to be due and payable on such returns, or on any assessments made against it or any of its properties by written notice, and all other taxes, assessments, fees, liabilities or other charges imposed on it or on its properties by applicable laws or regulations, except where such failure to file or pay, in any case or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
                6. Labor Matters. Except as disclosed in Schedule 5.1(f), Cerro Verde (i) is, and has been since March 16, 2003, in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to labor, industrial relations and the employment of its employees, except for any failure to comply that would not, in any case or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect and (ii) has no knowledge of any pending or existing labor dispute that would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
                7. Legal Proceedings.
                  1. There is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation, at law or in equity, or before any governmental authority or other Person, pending or, to the best knowledge of the PD Participant, the PD Participant Parents and Cerro Verde, threatened, against Cerro Verde or its assets that (x) questions the validity of any of the Transaction Documents or any action taken or to be taken pursuant hereto or thereto, or (y) in any case or in the aggregate would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
                  2. Except as set forth on Schedule 5.1(g)(ii), (x) as of December 31, 2004 and the Final Closing Date, there were no actions, suits, proceedings or investigations, at law or in equity, or before any governmental authority or other Person, pending or, to the best knowledge of the PD Participant, the PD Participant Parents and Cerro Verde, overtly threatened, in which Cerro Verde's claim to its mining concessions is or would be challenged, (y) as of December 31, 2004 and the Final Closing Date, there were no actions, suits or proceedings, at law or in equity, initiated by Cerro Verde relating to its mining concessions, and (z) as of December 31, 2004 and the Final Closing Date, to the best knowledge of the PD Participant, the PD Participant Parents and Cerro Verde, there were no competing, existing claims to such mining concessions reported in El Peruano within the twelve-month period immediately preceding the date of this Agreement or reg istered in the Book of Mining Rights of the Public Records Office, except in each case for any such actions, suits, proceedings, investigations or competing existing claims, that, in any case or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
                8. Consents, etc.Except in connection with the General Capital Increase and the Special Dividend, neither the execution or delivery by Cerro Verde of this Agreement or any of the Other Transaction Documents nor the consummation by Cerro Verde of the transactions provided for hereby or thereby is subject to any requirement that Cerro Verde obtain any consent, approval or authorization of, or make any declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or third party which, in any case or in the aggregate, if not obtained or made, would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, render such execution, delivery or consummation illegal, or materially impairupon the consummation of such transactions.
                9. Financial Statements. Attached as Schedule 5.1(i) to this Agreement are the audited financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 of Cerro Verde (the "Financial Statements"). The Financial Statements fairly present in all material respects the financial condition of Cerro Verde and the results of operations and changes in financial position as of that date and for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and have been prepared according to Peruvian GAAP, consistently applied throughout the periods reported on therein. There are no material off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or relationships attributable to Cerro Verde's business or to which Cerro Verde is a party that would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
                10. No Broker. No broker, finder, agent or other intermediary has been engaged by Cerro Verde in connection with the negotiation of any of the Transaction Documentsor the consummation of the transactions contemplated by sections 2and 3 hereof.
                11. Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities. Cerro Verde has not incurred any liabilities or obligations that would be required to be reflected or reserved against in a balance sheet prepared in accordance with Peruvian GAAP in a manner consistent with the Financial Statements except for (i) liabilities or obligations reflected or reserved against in the Financial Statements or (ii) liabilities, including liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business since December 31, 2004, that in any case or in the aggregate would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
                12. Absence of Certain Changes and Events. Except as set forth in Schedule 5.1(l) or as contemplated by this Agreement, the Feasibility Study or the Project Debt Agreements, since December 31, 2004, (x) Cerro Verde has conducted its business in the ordinary course and has not suffered any Material Adverse Effect, and (y) to the best knowledge of the PD Participant, the PD Participant Parents and Cerro Verde, no event or condition is threatened that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have, a Material Adverse Effect.
                13. Title to Assets, Mining and Beneficiation Concessions and Other Rights. Except as set forth in Schedule 5.1(m) or the Feasibility Study or as would not, in any case or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, Cerro Verde has full and sufficient rights to use the tangible personal property, mining and beneficiation concessions, water rights and surface lands necessary for the operation of the business of Cerro Verde as currently conducted and,closing with respect to Equity Securities, the Sulfide Project, as anticipated by the Feasibility Study to be conducted. Except as would not, in any case or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, or as disclosed in the Feasibility Study, any real property owned by Cerro Verde is currently served by all easements, rightsRespective Share and Adjusted Respective Share of way and utilities services that are necessary for the operationeach of the business of Cerro Verde as currently conducted thereon and with respect to the Sulfide Project, anticipated toParticipants shall be conducted by the Feasibility Study.
                14. Related Party Transactions and Commitments. Schedule 5.1(n) sets forth a true, complete and correct list as of December 31, 2004 of all related party transactions, contracts and commitments between Cerro Verde and its Affiliates involving continuing liabilities and obligations in excess of U.S.$50,000 per year, including an indication of which transactions, contracts and commitments will continue following the Final Closing.
                adjusted accordingly.

              3. Representations Regarding PDCAdditional Issuance of Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt. In the event a majority, but not 100%, of the Board shall determine (and with respect to the issuance of Equity Securities the holder or holders of a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the Company shall approve) that the Company should issue Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt, the Board shall fix (and if required by Peruvian law the holder or holders of a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the Company shall approve) the subscription price and other ter ms of such Equity Securities and/or, in the case of Subordinated Debt, principal amount, interest and other terms and cause the Company to give each Participant notice of its intention to issue such Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt to each Participant in an amount in proportion to its Respective Share and of the anticipated material terms thereof (the "Issuance Notice"). The terms and purchase price of the securities offered to one Participant shall be comparable to those offered to the other Participants (after taking into account the Participants' different Respective Shares). Each Participant shall have the right (but not the obligation) to purchase up to such portion (or any lesser amount) of (i) such Equity Securities as may be necessary for such Participant to maintain its Respective Share (after giving full effect to the issuance of such Equity Securities and to any conversion or exercise right provided by such Equity Securities or any other Equity Securities previously is sued) and/or (ii) such Subordinated Debt which expressed as a percentage of all Subordinated Debt being offered, is equal to such Participant's Respective Share. In order to exercise such right, a Participant must give notice (the "Acceptance Notice") to the Company within 20 days of the Issuance Notice specifying the portion of such Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt it wishes to purchase (all such Participants giving such notice being referred to as "Electing Participants"). All such Acceptance Notices shall be irrevocable and binding on the Electing Participant for six months from the date of the Issuance Notice. If any Participant shall fail to give an Acceptance Notice within such twenty-day period, shall give an Acceptance Notice within such period but elect to purchase less than all of the Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt to which it is entitled, or shall fail to purchase the Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt specified in the Acceptance Notice on a timely basis, the Company may, to the extent permitted under Peruvian law, (but shall not be required to) sell the Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt that such Participant would have been entitled to purchase to any Purchaser or Purchasers, at a closing to be held within six months of the Issuance Notice at such time and place as the Board may determine, on terms not materially more favorable to the Purchaser or Purchasers than those set forth in the Issuance Notice. At such closing, the Company shall also sell to each Electing Participant, and each Electing Participant shall purchase, the Equity Securities and/or Subordinated Debt specified in such Electing Participant's Acceptance Notice. At such closing, (a) each Purchaser of Equity Securities from the Company, together with the Company and all the Participants, shall execute and deliver an amendment to this Agreement whereby the Purchaser shall become a party to this Agreement entitled to all of the rights and subject to all of the ob ligations of a Participant hereunder, (b) to the extent required under Peruvian law, each Purchaser of Equity Securities, together with the requisite number of Participants as provided in the Company estatutos, shall execute and deliver an amendment to such estatutos to reflect the new capital structure of the Company and (c) upon the consummation of such closing with respect to Equity Securities, the Respective Share and Adjusted Respective Share of each of the Participants shall be adjusted accordingly.
              4. . PDC hereby represents and warrants to each of BVN, SMM,SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant as follows:

                1. Organization, Authority, Binding Effect. PDC is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of theState of New York. PDC has the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreementand the Shareholders Agreement and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby; prior to the First Closing Date, upon ratification by the PDC Board of Directors of the authorization of this Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement by the Executive Committee of the PDC Board of Directors, the execution and delivery of this Agreementand the Shareholders Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of P DC; this Agreement has been, and on the Final Closing Date the Shareholders Agreement will have been, duly executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer of PDC; and this Agreement constitutes, and on the Final Closing Date the Shareholders Agreement will constitute, the valid, legal and binding obligation of PDC, in each case enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except that such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors or parties to executory contracts generally and by equitable principles of general applicability.
                2. Compliance with Other Instruments and Laws. Neither the execution and delivery by PDC of this Agreementor the Shareholders Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby will result in any violation of or be in conflict with, constitute a default under, or result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance upon any property of PDC pursuant to any provision of the PDCCertificate of IncorporationorBy-Laws, or any agreement (other than a Project Debt Agreement), instrument, judgment, decree, order, law or regulation applicable to PDC or any of its properties, except where such violation, conflict, default or lien, charge or encumbrance, in any case or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected t o result in a Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                3. Legal Proceedings. There is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation, at law or in equity, or before any governmental authority or other Person, pending or, to the best knowledge of PDC, threatened, against PDC or its assets that questions the validity of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement, or any action taken or to be taken pursuant hereto or that otherwise would reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on the ability of PDC to perform its obligations under this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                4. Consents, etc. Exceptin connection with the General Capital Increase or the Special Dividend, neither the execution or delivery by PDC of this Agreementor the Shareholders Agreement nor the consummation by PDC of the transactions provided for herebyor thereby is subject to any requirement that PDC obtain any consent, approval or authorization of, or make any declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or third party which, in any case or in the aggregate, if not obtained or made, would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, render such execution, delivery or consummation illegal, or materially impair the consummation of such transactions.
                5. Ownership of the PD Participant and Cerro Verde. At the date of this Agreement, (i) PDC is the record and beneficial owner of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of CAMC, (ii) CAMC is the record and beneficial owner of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of CMC, (iii) CMC is the record and beneficial owner of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the PD Participant, (iv) the PD Participant is the record and beneficial owner of approximately 82.5% of the Current Outstanding Shares and (v) except as contemplated in the Transaction Documents,there are not outstanding any subscriptions, options, warrants, conversion rights or other agreements or commitments of any kind directly or indirectly obligating Cerro Verde to issue or sell any shares of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares.
                6. No Broker. Other than Apoyo Consultoria S.A.C., whose fees will be paid by PDC, no broker, finder, agent or other intermediary has been engaged by PDC in connection with the negotiation of this Agreementor the consummation of the transactions contemplated by sections 2 and 3hereof.
              5. Representations Regarding the PD Participant
              6. . The PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant each hereby represents and warrants to each of BVN, SMM,SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant as follows:

                1. Organization, Authority, Binding Effect. The PD Participant is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state ofDelaware. The PD Participant has the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby; the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been or will have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of the PD Participant; this Agreement has been, and on the Final Closing Date theShareholders Agreementwill have been, duly executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer of the PD Participant; this Agreement constitutes, and on the Final Closing Date, theShareholders Agreementwill constitute, the valid, legal and binding obligation of the PD Participant, in each case enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except that such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors or parties to executory contracts generally and by equitable principles of general applicability.
                2. Compliance with Other Instruments and Laws. Neither the execution or delivery by the PD Participant of this Agreement or theShareholders Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby will result in any violation of or be in conflict with, constitute a default under, or result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance, upon any property of the PD Participant pursuant to, any provision of theCertificate of IncorporationorBy-Laws of the PD Participant, or any agreement (other than a Project Debt Agreement), instrument, judgment, decree, order, law or regulation applicable to the PD Participant or any of its properties, except where such violation, conflict, default or lien, charge or encumbrance, in any case or the aggreg ate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                3. Legal Proceedings. There is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation, at law or in equity, or before any governmental authority or other Person, pending or, to the best knowledge of the PD Participant, threatened, against the PD Participant or its assets that questions the validity of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement or any action taken or to be taken pursuant hereto or thereto or that otherwise would reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on the ability of the PD Participant to perform its obligations under this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                4. Consents, etc. Exceptin connection with the General Capital Increase or the Special Dividend, neither the execution or delivery by the PD Participant of this Agreement or theShareholders Agreementnor the consummation by the PD Participant of the transactions provided forhereby or therebyis subject to any requirement that the PD Participant obtain any consent, approval or authorization of, or make any declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or third party which, in any case or in the aggregate, if not obtained or made, would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, render such execution, delivery or consummation illegal, or materially impair the consumma tion of such transactions.
                5. No Broker. Other than Credibolsa Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A. whose fees will be paid by the PD Participant, no broker, finder, agent or other intermediary has been engaged by the PD Participant in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or theShareholders Agreementor the consummation of the transactions contemplated by section 2 or 3hereof.
              7. Representations RegardingSCand SMM
              8. . SCand SMMeach hereby represents and warrants to each of BVN, PDC, CAMC, CMC, the PD Participant and Cerro Verdeas follows:

                1. Organization, Authority, Binding Effect.SCand SMM each is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws ofJapan.SCand SMM each has the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement and, in the case of SMM, the SMM Concentrate Agreement and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby; the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement and, in the case of SMM, the SMM Concentrate Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part ofSCand SMM, as applicable; this Agreement has been, and on the Final Closing Date the Sharehold ers Agreement and the SMM Concentrate Agreement will have been, duly executed and delivered by duly authorized officers of each ofSCand SMM; and this Agreement constitutes, and on the Final Closing Date the Shareholders Agreement and the SMM Concentrate Agreement will constitute, the valid, legal and binding obligation ofSCand SMM, respectively, in each case enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except that such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors or parties to executory contracts generally and by equitable principles of general applicability.
                2. Compliance with Other Instruments and Laws. Neither the execution and delivery bySCor SMM of this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement or, in the case of SMM, the SMM Concentrate Agreement, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated herebyor thereby will result in any violation of or be in conflict with, constitute a default under, or result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance upon any property of eitherSCor SMM pursuant to any provision of their respective organizational documents, or any agreement (other than a Project Debt Agreement), instrument, judgment, decree, order, law or regulation applicable toSCor SMM or any of their respe ctive properties, except where such violation, conflict, default or lien, charge or encumbrance, in any case or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement or the SMM Concentrate Agreement.
                3. Legal Proceedings. There is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation, at law or in equity, or before any governmental authority or other Person, pending or, to the best knowledge ofSCand SMM, threatened, againstSCor SMMor any of their respective assets that questions the validity of this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement or the SMM Concentrate Agreement or any action taken or to be taken pursuant hereto or thereto or that otherwise would reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on the ability of SC or SMM to perform their obligations under this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement or the SMM Concentrate Agreement.
                4. Consents, etc. Neither the execution or delivery bySCor SMM of this Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement or, in the case of SMM, the SMM Concentrate Agreement, nor the consummation bySCor SMM of the transactions provided for herebyor thereby is subject to any requirement thatSCor SMM obtain any consent, approval or authorization of, or make any declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or third party which, in any case or in the aggregate, if not obtained or made, would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, render such execution, delivery or consummation illega l, or materially impair the consummation of such transactions.
                5. Ownership of SGM and the Sumitomo Participant.SCis the record and beneficial owner of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of SGM. As of the First Closing Date, SGM will be the record and beneficial owner of 20% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Sumitomo Participant and SMM will be the record and beneficial owner of 80% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Sumitomo Participant. There are not outstanding any subscriptions, options, warrants, conversion rights or other agreements or commitments of any kind directly or indirectly obligating SGM or the Sumitomo Participant to issue or sell any shares of their respective capital stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares.
                6. No Broker. No broker, finder, agent or other intermediary has been engaged bySCor SMM in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or the other agreements contemplated hereby or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by sections 2and 3 hereof.
              9. Representations Regarding SGM and the Sumitomo Participant
              10. . Each of the Sumitomo Participant Parents hereby represents and warrants to each of BVN, PDC, CAMC, CMC, the PD Participant and Cerro Verde as follows:

                1. Organization, Authority, Binding Effect. SGM and the Sumitomo Participant each is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws ofthe Netherlands. SGM and the Sumitomo Participant each has the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement, and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of SGM and the Sumitomo Participant; this Agreement has been, and on the Final Closing Date the Shareholders Agreement will have been, duly executed and delivered by duly authorized officers of each of SGM and the Sumitomo Participant, as applicable; and this Agreement constitutes, and on the Final Closing Date the Shareholders Agreement will constitute, the valid, legal and binding obligation of SGM and the Sumitomo Participant, respectively, in each case enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except that such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors or parties to executory contracts generally and by equitable principles of general applicability.
                2. Compliance with Other Instruments and Laws. Neither the execution and delivery by SGM or the Sumitomo Participant of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby will result in any violation of or be in conflict with, constitute a default under, or result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance upon any property of SGM or the Sumitomo Participant pursuant to, any provision of their respectiveorganizational documents, or any agreement (other than a Project Debt Agreement), instrument, judgment, decree, order, law or regulation applicable to SGM or the Sumitomo Participant or any of their respective properties, except where such violation, conflict, default or lien, charge or encumbrance, in any case or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect or materially impair t he consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                3. Legal Proceedings. There is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation, at law or in equity, or before any governmental authority or other Person, pending or, to the best knowledge of SGM and the Sumitomo Participant, threatened, against SGM or the Sumitomo Participant or any of their respective assets that questions the validity of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement, or any action taken or to be taken pursuant hereto or thereto or that otherwise would reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on the ability of SGM or the Sumitomo Participant to perform their obligations under this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                4. Consents, etc. Neither the execution or delivery by SGM or the Sumitomo Participant of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement nor the consummation by SGM or the Sumitomo Participant of the transactions provided for hereby or thereby is subject to any requirement that SGM or the Sumitomo Participant obtain any consent, approval or authorization of, or make any declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or third party which, in any case or in the aggregate, if not obtained or made, would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, render such execution, delivery or consummation illegal, or materially impair the consummation of such transactions.
                5. Ownership of the Sumitomo Participant. As of the First Closing Date, SGM and SMM will be the record and beneficial owners of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Sumitomo Participant. As of the First Closing Date, there will not be outstanding any subscriptions, options, warrants, conversion rights or other agreements or commitments of any kind directly or indirectly obligating the Sumitomo Participant to issue or sell any shares of the Sumitomo Participant's capital stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares.
                6. No Broker. No broker, finder, agent or other intermediary has been engaged by SGM or the Sumitomo Participant in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by section 2or 3 hereof.
              11. Representations Regarding BVN
              12. . BVN hereby represents and warrants to each of PDC, CAMC, CMC, the PD Participant, the Sumitomo Participant, each of the Sumitomo Participant Parents and Cerro Verde as follows:

                1. Organization, Authority, Binding Effect. BVN is a sociedad anónima abierta duly formed, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the Republic of Peru. BVN has the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of BVN; this Agreement has been, and on the Final Closing Date the Shareholders Agreement will have been, duly executed and delivered by duly authorized officers of BVN; and this Agreement constitutes, and on the Final Closing Date the Shareholders Agreement will constitute, the valid, legal and binding obligation of BVN, in each case enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except that such enforceability may be limit ed by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors or parties to executory contracts generally and by equitable principles of general applicability.
                2. Compliance with Other Instruments and Laws. Neither the execution and delivery by BVN of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby will result in any violation of or be in conflict with, constitute a default under, or result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance upon any property of BVN pursuant to, any provision of its organizational documents, or any agreement (other than a Project Debt Agreement), instrument, judgment, decree, order, law or regulation applicable to BVN or any of its properties, except where such violation, conflict, default or lien, charge or encumbrance, in any case or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                3. Legal Proceedings. There is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation, at law or in equity, or before any governmental authority or other Person, pending or, to the best knowledge of BVN, threatened, against BVN or any of its assets that questions the validity of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement, or any action taken or to be taken pursuant hereto or thereto or that otherwise would reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on the ability of BVN to perform its obligations under this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement.
                4. Consents, etc. Except in connection with the General Capital Increase, neither the execution or delivery by BVN of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement nor the consummation by BVN of the transactions provided for hereby or thereby is subject to any requirement that BVN obtain any consent, approval or authorization of, or make any declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or third party which, in any case or in the aggregate, if not obtained or made, would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, render such execution, delivery or consummation illegal, or materially impair the consummation of such transactions.
                5. No Broker. No broker, finder, agent or other intermediary has been engaged by BVN in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or the Shareholders Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by sections 2 and 3 hereof.
            7. CovenantsCompetition; Business Opportunities; Standstill; Transactions with Affiliates and Other Arrangements
            8. .

              1. No Sale of Interest in the Participants
              2. . As of the First Closing Date and at all times thereafter, PDC shall own directly or indirectly 100% of each class of the outstanding capital stock of the PD Participant. As of the First Closing Date and at all times thereafter, SMM and SC shall own directly or indirectly 100% of each class of the outstanding capital stock of the Sumitomo Participant and SC shall own directly or indirectly 100% of each class of each class of the outstanding capital stock of SGM.

                  1. Permitted EncumbrancesCompetition; Business Opportunities. Subject to section 12, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent any Affiliate of any Participant, at any time and without notice to or agreement by any Participant, from entering into or continuing any business, whether or not competitive with the Company, or acquiring or exploiting any mining rights, whether or not in the vicinity of any property owned by the Company, and none of the Affiliates of any Participants shall have any obligation to offer business or other opportunities to the Company or any other Participant.
                  2. . Neither PDC, SMM, SC nor SGM, as the case may be, may grant or permit to exist any lien, charge or encumbrance on, or other security interest in, the stock of the PD Participant, the Sumitomo Participant or BVN, except to the extent required by any Project Debt Agreements.

                  3. Beneficial Ownership of PDC Common StockStandstill
                  4. . FromExcept as contemplated in this Agreement, no Participant (other than the date hereof until the expiration of an eighteen-month period following the date when BVN, SMM, SGM, SCPD Participant) or PDC shall have ceased to hold any direct or indirect ownership interest in Cerro Verde, without the prior written consent of the Board of Directors of PDC, BVN, SMM, SGM and SC shall not, and shall not permit any Affiliate of any Participant (other than the PD Participant), will (or will assist or encourage others to), directly or indirectly, acquire or agree, offer, seek or propose to acquire, ownership (including, without limitation, beneficial ownership (asas defined as of the date hereof in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of any common sharesvoting stock of PDC, if,the Company, or any subsidiary or division thereof or successor to the Company, or any rights or options to acquire such ownership from a third party or otherwise, such that after any such acquisition, (i ) the Sumitomo Participant and its Affiliates would beneficially own a Respective Share in excess of 24.99% of the then outstanding voting stock of the Company, or (ii) BVN SMM and SC andits Affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 20.1% of the then outstanding voting stock of the Company.

                  5. Transactions with Affiliates. All transactions between any Participant or any of its Affiliate would holdAffiliates and the Company shall be on commercially reasonable terms that are at least as favorable to the Company as those which might be obtained in an arm's-length transaction with a Person that is not a shareholder or control,a Participant.
                  6. Use of Proceeds. Unless the Board unanimously determines otherwise, the PD Participant shall cause the Company to, and the Company shall, use the proceeds from the General Capital Increase paid by the Sumitomo Participant solely for financing the design, engineering, development, permitting, procurement, construction, pre-stripping, test production, commissioning and other works, services, start-up costs and working capital in connection with the Sulfide Project.
                  7. Status Reports. Prior to final completion of the Sulfide Project as set forth in the aggregate, beneficial ownershipProject Debt Agreements, the Company and the PD Participant shall provide the Sumitomo Participant and BVN with copies of more than two percentany periodic status reports provided to the Senior Lenders regarding the development of the common sharesSulfide Project pursuant to the terms of the Project Debt Agreements at the time such reports are provided to the Senior Lenders and, subject to section 12 hereof, such other information as the Sumitomo Participant and BVN may reasonably request.
                  8. Approval of Minutes. The Participants shall take all actions necessary to ensure that Participants holding a Respective Share greater than 10.00% shall each nominate one representative (together, the "Participant Nominees") to approve and sign the minutes of any General Shareholders Meeting in accordance with Article 32 of the estatutos of the Company. At each General Shareholders Meeting, each Participant shall cast its votes in favor of the Participant Nominees.
                  9. Virtual Meetings. The Participants shall take all action necessary to cause their nominees to the Board to not oppose the use of virtual meetings as contemplated in Article 40 of the estatutos of the Company.
                  10. Estatutos. Unless approved by the Board in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article 41 of the estatutos of the Company, the Participants shall not vote or take any action to (i) amend or modify Article 34, 37 or 41 of the estatutos of the Company (or the defined terms used therein); (ii) approve any action which has not been approved pursuant to a vote under Article 41(a) through (e) of the estatutos of the Company; or (iii) pursuant to Article 36 of the estatutos of the Company, remove a director or deputy director elected pursuant to section 2.2 of this Agreement. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that money damages w ill be the sole remedy for any breach of this section 11.8 and that the Company and any Participant shall not have the right to specific performance and/or injunctive relief to enforce the provisions of this section 11.8.
                  11. Sulfide Project. The PD Participant shall cause the Company to, and the Company shall, use all reasonable efforts to develop the Sulfide Project generally as described in the Feasibility Study, with such changes as the Board determines, in its good faith reasonable judgment, to be necessary or advisable and which do not substantially alter the basic nature and scope of such facilities.
                  12. Registration of this Agreement. The Company shall cause this Agreement to be registered in its Share Registration Book (Libro de Matrícula de Acciones) immediately after execution hereof.
                  13. Support of Senior Project Debt. It is an important objective of all of the parties hereto that the Company enter into Senior Project Debt Agreements regarding the financing of the Sulfide Project (the "Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements"), and the parties hereto agree to work diligently to cause the Company to use all reasonable efforts to enter into the Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements. PDC then outstanding.

                    will enter into, and will cause the PD Participant to enter into, at or prior to the initial closing under the Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements, any completion agreement with or other undertakings to the Senior Project Lenders required pursuant to the Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements. SMM, SC, and SGM each will enter into, and each will cause the Sumitomo Participant to enter into, at or prior to the initial closing under the Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements, any completion agreement with or other undertakings to the Senior Project Lenders;provided that any such completion agreement (i) will terminate upon termination of the completion agreement or other undertakings provided by PDC and the PD Participant to the Senior Project Lenders pursuant to the Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements, and (ii) will not include any restrictive financial covenants with respect to SMM, SC, SGM or the Sumitomo Participant. BVN will enter into, at or prior to the initial closing under the Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements, any completion agreement with or other undertaking to the Senior Project Lenders required pursuant to the Sulfide Project Senior Debt Agreements. Each party's obligations pursuant to any such completion agreeme nt or other undertakings shall be several and in proportion to such party's Adjusted Respective Share.
                  14. Covenants Regardingof PDC, SMM, SC and SGM. PDC shall cause (i) the SumitomoPD Participant to duly and punctually perform all its obligations under this Agreement and the estatutos of the Company and (ii) the Operator to duly and punctually perform all its obligations under the Operator's Agreement.
                  15. .

                    1. SMM, SC and SGM shall cause the Sumitomo Participant to be formed prior to the First Closing Dateduly and until such time as the Sumitomo Participant has been formed and has joined as a party topunctually perform its obligations under this Agreement inand the manner contemplated in section 6.5(b), SMM shall have all the rights, obligations and interestsestatutos of the Sumitomo Participant set forth herein as if it were the Sumitomo Participant.
                    2. Each of the parties hereto (i) hereby consents to the Sumitomo Participant joining as a party to this Agreement as soon as it has been formed;provided that the Sumitomo Participant shall agree in a writing reasonably satisfactory to Cerro Verde to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof and (ii) shall execute and deliver such certificates, opinions and other documents as may be reasonably requested by Cerro Verde in order to effect the admission of the Sumitomo Participant as a party hereto.Company.
                  16. Actions to Cause Closing, etc.
                    1. Actions to Cause Closing. Subject to the terms and conditions provided herein, each of the parties hereto shall use all reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all action necessary or proper and advisable to cause (i) the satisfaction of all the conditions to closing set forth in section 7 hereof; and (ii) the Final Closing to occur on or before September 30, 2005.
                    2. Confidentiality. The parties hereto shall adhere to the undertakings set forth in section 12 of the Shareholders Agreement,mutatismutandis.
                  17. Transfers of Interests
                  18. . Prior to the Final Closing, other than as set forth in section 2 or 3, the PD Participant Parents, the Sumitomo Participant Parents, the Sumitomo Participant, the PD Participant, BVN and Cerro Verde shall not engage in any transaction: (i) involving the issuance, sale, purchase, transfer or other disposition of Current Outstanding Shares or Preemptive Rights; or (ii) that could result in either (a) the PD Participant ceasing to hold at least a 53.56% direct or indirect equity interest in Cerro Verde, or (b) any person other than the Sumitomo Participant or BVN or their respective Affiliates acquiring a direct or indirect equity interest in Cerro Verde greater than 16.0%. Other than with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, prior to the Final Closing, the PD Participant, the Sumitomo Participant and BVN shall notify the other parties hereto in writing of any issuan ce, sale, purchase, transfer or other disposition of shares of Current Outstanding Shares. Prior to the Final Closing upon acquiring any equity interest in the Sumitomo Participant, neither SGM nor SMM shall sell or otherwise transfer any direct or indirect equity interest in the Sumitomo Participant.

                  19. Competition; Business Opportunities
                  20. . Subject to section 9 below, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent any party hereto or any Affiliate of any such party, at any time and without notice to or agreement by any other such party, from entering into or continuing any business, whether or not competitive with Cerro Verde, or acquiring or exploiting mining rights, whether or not in the vicinity of any property owned by Cerro Verde and no party hereto shall have any obligation to offer business or other opportunities to Cerro Verde or to any other party hereto.

                  21. Conduct of Business until Final Closing
                  22. . From the date hereof until the Final Closing Date, except to the extent otherwise contemplated by this Agreement, the Feasibility Study or the Project Debt Agreements, Cerro Verde shall, and PDC and the PD Participant shall cause Cerro Verde to, conduct its business in all material respects in the ordinary course of business, and use its commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact Cerro Verde's assets, mining and beneficiation concessions and water rights, business and relationships with its management, employees, suppliers, customers, creditors, agents and other Persons with whom it has a business relationship.

                  23. Opinions of Counsel
                  24. .

                    1. Cerro Verde shall cause (i) Estudio Rodrigo, Elias & Medrano, Peruvian counsel for Cerro Verde, (ii) Ms. Julia Torreblanca, Legal and Environmental Affairs Manager of Cerro Verde, (iii) Mr. J. Dale Brunk, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of PDC, and (iv) Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, special New York counsel for Cerro Verde, to deliver written opinions dated as of the First Closing Date and Final Closing Date to SC, SMM and the Sumitomo Participant in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to SC, SMM and the Sumitomo Participant.
                    2. SC, SMM, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant (the "Sumitomo Parties") shall cause (i) Estudio Grau, Peruvian counsel for the Sumitomo Parties, (ii) Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, special New York counsel for the Sumitomo Parties, and (iii) Dutch counsel for the Sumitomo Parties, to deliver written opinions dated as of the First Closing Date and Final Closing Date to the PD Participant Parents, the PD Participant and Cerro Verde in formand substance reasonably satisfactory to the PD Participant Parents, the PD Participant and Cerro Verde.
                1. Conditions to ClosingConfidentiality; Conflicts of Interest.
                    1. Conditions to Obligations of SMM, SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant
                    2. . The obligation of the Sumitomo Participant to exercise the Sumitomo First Round Rights and pay to Cerro Verde the aggregate Per Share Price with respect thereto pursuant to section 3.1(b) on the First Closing Date and the obligations of each of the Sumitomo Participant, SMM, SC and SGM to take the actions required to be taken by each of such parties at the Final Closing is subject to the satisfaction, at or prior to the First Closing Date and Final Closing Date, as applicable, of each of the following conditions (the "Closing Conditions"), any of which may be waived in whole or in part by SMM, SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant, as applicable:

                      1. Representations and Warranties. Each of the representations and warranties of Cerro Verde, the PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the First Closing Date and the Final Closing Date, with the same effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and as of the First Closing Date and the Final Closing Date, except that such representations and warranties that are made as of a specific date need only be true as of such date.
                      2. Covenants. All of the covenants, agreements, undertakings and obligations that Cerro Verde, the PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant are required to perform or to comply with pursuant to this Agreement at or prior to the First Closing or Final Closing, as applicable, shall have been duly performed and complied with in all material respects; for the avoidance of doubt, the failure to deliver any of the opinions as described in section 6.9 shall constitute failure to have complied with such covenants in all material respects.
                      3. Certificates. Each of Cerro Verde, the PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant shall have delivered to SC, SMM, and the Sumitomo Participant a certificate dated as of the First Closing Date and the Final Closing Date that (i) the conditions referred to in sections 7.1(a), 7.1(b), 7.1(d) and, in the case of the Final Closing, 7.1(f) have been satisfied, (ii) the changes set forth in section 7.1(e) have not occurred, (iii) the actions contemplated in section 7.1(g) have occurred and (iv) the Board of Directors of PDC and Cerro Verde have approved the Sulfide Project, and that such approvals, including any resolutions, are in full force and effect on the date thereof, and have not been amended, modified, rescinded or revoked.
                      4. No Judgment, Decree, Order, Action or Proceeding. No judgment, decree, order, action or proceeding shall be in effect, pending or threatened by any governmental body or agency that (i) involves a challenge to or seeks to prohibit, delay or restrict the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents, including the General Capital Increase and the Sulfide Project or (ii) questions the validity or legality of any of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents, including the General Capital Increase and the Sulfide Project.
                      5. No Material Adverse Effect. There shall not have occurred any Material Adverse Effect.
                      6. Minimum Net Working Capital. The Board shall have determined that the sum of (x) net working capital of Cerro Verde plus (y) costs incurred in connection with the Sulfide Project that should be classified under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States as construction in progress, in each case as of the Final Closing Date, shall be no less than U.S.$40.0 million after giving effect to the Special Dividend contemplated by this Agreement.
                      7. Election of Directors. The PD Participant shall have taken all necessary action prior to the Final Closing Date to call an extraordinary shareholders meeting, to be held promptly after the registration with CAVALI of BVN's and the Sumitomo Participant's ownership of Capital Increase Shares, to elect new directors and alternate directors of Cerro Verde.
                      8. Transaction Documents. On or prior to the Final Closing Date, (i) Cerro Verde, the PD Participant, PDC and BVN shall have executed and delivered the Shareholders Agreement; (ii) Cerro Verde and MPDP shall have executed and delivered the Operator's Agreement; and (iii) Cerro Verde shall have executed and delivered the SMM Concentrate Agreement.
                    3. Conditions to Obligations of Cerro Verde, the PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant
                    4. . The obligations of Cerro Verde, the PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant to take the actions required to be taken by each of such parties at the First Closing and Final Closing is subject to the satisfaction, at or prior to the First Closing Date and the Final Closing Date, as applicable, of each of the following conditions (any of which may be waived in whole or in part by Cerro Verde, PDC, the PD Participant Parents and the PD Participant, as applicable):

                      1. Representations and Warranties. Each of the representations and warranties of BVN, SMM, SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the First Closing Date and the Final Closing Date, with the same effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and as of the First Closing Date and the Final Closing Date, except that such representations and warranties that are made as of a specific date need only be true as of such date.
                      2. Covenants. All of the covenants, agreements, undertakings and obligations that BVN, SMM, SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant are required to perform or to comply with pursuant to this Agreement at or prior to the First Closing or Final Closing, as applicable, shall have been duly performed and complied with in all material respects.
                      3. Officer's Certificate. Each of BVN, SMM, SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant shall have delivered to Cerro Verde, PDC and the PD Participant a certificate, dated as of the First Closing Date and the Final Closing Date and signed by senior executive officers of BVN, SMM, SC, SGM and the Sumitomo Participant representing that the conditions referred to in sections 7.2(a) and 7.2(b) have been satisfied.
                      4. Transaction Documents. On the Final Closing Date, (i) BVN, the Sumitomo Participant, SMM, SC and SGM shall have executed and delivered the Shareholders Agreement; and (ii) SMM shall have executed and delivered the SMM Concentrate Agreement.
                    5. Consequences of Failure to Satisfy Conditions to Closing
                    6. . If (i) the Sumitomo Participant delivers written notice to the Board on the Final Closing Date in its good faith and reasonable judgment stating that the Capital Increase Closing Conditions have not been satisfied or waived as of such date, (ii) the Board determines on or prior to the Final Closing Date that the PD Closing Conditions have not been satisfied or waived as of such date, or (iii) unless otherwise agreed by the Sumitomo Participant, the Final Closing shall not have occurred by September 30, 2005, the Board shall cause Cerro Verde to and Cerro Verde shall:

                      1. cancel the General Capital Increase and the Special Dividend; and
                      2. return promptly to each applicable subscriber or purchaser (x) the aggregate Per Share Price in United States dollars or any other amount of consideration paid by such subscriber or purchaser to Cerro Verde in connection with the exercise of Preemptive Rights regarding the Capital Increase Shares or the purchase of Unsubscribed Shares, plus (y) interest, calculated at a rate per annum equal to the Six Month LIBOR Rate, on such aggregate Per Share Price for the period commencing on June 30, 2005 and ending on the day before such aggregate Per Share Price is returned;provided that with respect to subscribers and purchasers of a Fully Diluted Respective share that exceeds five percent, such return shall be made in immediately available funds by wire transfer to an account designated by each applicable subscriber or purchaser, in each case without deduction for Taxes.
                  1. Termination
                  2. .

                    1. Event of Termination
                    2. . Each of the parties hereto shares the mutual objective of causing the Final Closing to occur as soon as possible and shall use all reasonable efforts to cause the Final Closing to occur by June 30, 2005;provided that if the Final Closing shall not have been consummated on or before September 30, 2005 or such other date as the parties may mutually agree, any party hereto may thereafter terminate this Agreement effective upon written notice to each other party hereto.

                    3. Effect of Termination
                    4. .

                      1. The representations and warranties made by Cerro Verde, the PD Participant and the PD Participant Parents in section 5.1 and section 5.2(e), including as set forth in any certificate delivered pursuant to this Agreement, shall survive the Closing until the date Full Completion (as defined in the Project Debt Agreements) of the Sulfide Project has occurred.
                      2. No claim for indemnification, reimbursement or any other remedy pursuant to section 8.3 hereof may be brought with respect to breaches of representations or warranties contained herein after the expiration date set forth in section 8.2(a);provided, that if, prior to such date and in compliance with section 8.4, a party entitled to indemnification hereunder shall have notified an indemnifying party in writing of a claim for indemnification under this section 8 (whether or not formal legal action shall have been commenced based upon such claim), such claim shall continue to be subject to indemnification in accordance with this section 8 notwithstanding such expiration date.
                    5. Indemnification
                    6. .

                      1. The PD Participant and the PD Participant Parents agree, jointly and severally, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless SMM, SC and the Sumitomo Participant, from, against and in respect of any damage, loss, liability, claim or expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result thereof (collectively, "Damages"), whether or not involving a third party claim, arising, directly or indirectly, out of or in connection with, or resulting from the inaccuracy or breach of any representation or warranty made by it in section 5.1 or 5.2(e), including as set forth in any certificate delivered pursuant to this Agreement. In no event shall the PD Participant or the PD Participant Parents have any liability under this section 8.3 (x) in an aggregate amount that exceeds 50% of the net proceeds received by Cerro Verde from the Sumitomo Participant or any of its Affiliates pursuant to or as contemplated by this Agreement or the exercis e of Preemptive Rights, (y) for any other matter under this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (z) unless and until the aggregate amount of Damages shall exceed U.S.$5,000,000 (the "Liability Threshold Amount"). If the Liability Threshold Amount is exceeded, the Liability Threshold Amount shall be recoverable in addition to any Damages in excess thereof. The Liability Threshold Amount shall be U.S.$0 in lieu of U.S.$5,000,000 in any case in which the Damages are finally determined to have arisen solely from the Indemnitor's willful misconduct, fraud or intentional breach of this Agreement.
                      2. The right of SC, SMM and the Sumitomo Participant to indemnification under this section 8.3 shall be limited as follows:
                        1. The amount of any Damages incurred by an Indemnitee shall be reduced by the net amount of the tax benefits realized by any Indemnitee or its respective Subsidiaries or Affiliates by reason of such Damages;provided that if such tax benefits are realized by Cerro Verde the amount of any Damages shall be reduced by such Indemnitee's Respective Share of the net amount of such benefits; and
                        2. The amount of any Damages incurred by an Indemnitee shall be reduced by the net amount any Indemnitee, or its respective Subsidiaries or Affiliates, or, in the event that such Damages arise from losses suffered directly or indirectly by Cerro Verde, such Indemnitee's Respective Share of the net amount that Cerro Verde, recovers (after deducting all reasonable attorneys' fees, out-of-pocket expenses and other costs of recovery) from any insurer or other party liable for such Damages, and the Indemnitees and Cerro Verde shall use commercially reasonable efforts to effect any such recovery.
                    7. Indemnification Procedures
                    8. . A party entitled to indemnification hereunder shall herein be referred to as an "Indemnitee." A party obligated to indemnify an Indemnitee hereunder shall herein be referred to as an "Indemnitor."

                      1. If an Indemnitee receives notice of any claim or the commencement of any action by any third party that such Indemnitee reasonably believes may give rise to a claim for indemnification from an Indemnitor hereunder, and such Indemnitee intends to seek indemnification from such Indemnitor with respect thereto under this section 8.3, such Indemnitee shall, promptly provide written notice (the "Third Party Claim Notice") thereof to such Indemnitor;provided,however, that any failure to provide such Third Party Claim Notice shall not release the Indemnitor from its obligations under section 8.3 except to the extent that such failure results in actual prejudice to the Indemnitor. Each Third Party Claim Notice shall (i) specify in reasonable detail the basis on which indemnification is being asserted, (ii) provide a reasonable estimate of the amount of the Damages asserted therein to the extent then feasible (which estimate shall not be conclusive of the final amount of such claim or demand), (iii) specify the provision or provisions of this Agreement under which such Damages are asserted and (iv) include copies of all notices and documents (including court papers) served on or received by the Indemnitee from such third party. Upon receipt of a Third Party Claim Notice, the Indemnitor shall have 45 calendar days to notify the Indemnitee whether or not it desires to participate in such claim or action or to assume the defense thereof. All costs and expenses incurred by the Indemnitor in participating in such claim or action or defending such claim or action shall be borne by the Indemnitor. The Indemnitor shall not settle, compromise or offer to settle or compromise any such claim or action on a basis which would result in the imposition of a consent order, injunction, decree or other non-monetary relief on an Indemnitee without the written consent of such Indemnitee, which consent shall not be unreasonably withhe ld or delayed. After notice to the Indemnitee of the Indemnitor's election to assume the defense of such claim or action, the Indemnitor shall not be liable to the Indemnitee under section 8.3 for any legal or other expenses subsequently incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with the defense thereof;provided that the Indemnitee shall have the right to employ separate or additional counsel to represent it so long as the fees and expenses of such separate or additional counsel shall be paid by the Indemnitee. If the Indemnitor does not elect to assume the defense of such claim or action within 45 calendar days of the Indemnitee's delivery of the Third Party Claim Notice, the Indemnitee shall be entitled to assume the defense thereof. Unless it has been conclusively determined through a final, non-appealable judicial determination (or settlement tantamount thereto) that the Indemnitor is not liable to the Indemnitee under this section 8.4, the Indemnitee shall act reasonably and in acc ordance with its good faith business judgment with respect thereto, and shall not settle, compromise, or offer to settle or compromise any claim or action on a basis which would result in the imposition of a consent order, injunction, decree or other non-monetary relief affecting any Indemnitor without the consent of the Indemnitor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The parties hereto agree to render to each other such assistance as may reasonably be requested in order to insure the proper and adequate defense of any such claim or action, including making employees available on a mutually convenient basis to provide additional information and explanation of any relevant materials or to testify at any proceedings relating to such claim or action.
                      2. Within 15 Business Days after an Indemnitee suffers any Damages not involving a third party claim or action that such Indemnitee reasonably believes may give rise to a claim for indemnification from an Indemnitor hereunder, and such Indemnitee intends to seek indemnification from such Indemnitor with respect thereto under section 8.3, such Indemnitee shall deliver a written notice of such claim, which notice shall contain the information described in the second sentence of section 8.4(a) (a "Direct Claim Notice") to such Indemnitor;provided,however, that any failure to provide such Direct Claim Notice shall not release the Indemnitor from its obligations under section 8.3 except to the extent that such failure results in actual prejudice to the Indemnitor. If the Indemnitor does not notify the Indemnitee within 45 calendar days following its receipt of such Direct Claim Notice that the Indemnitor disputes its liability to the Indemnit ee under sections 8.3 and 8.4, such claim specified by the Indemnitee in such notice shall be conclusively deemed a liability of the Indemnitor under section 8.3 and subject to the limitations therein, the Indemnitor shall pay the amount of such claim to the Indemnitee promptly after demand therefor, or in the case of any notice in which the amount of the claim (or any portion thereof) is estimated, on such later date when the amount of such claim (or such portion thereof) is finally determined. If the Indemnitor has timely disputed its liability with respect to such claim as provided above, the Indemnitor and the Indemnitee shall proceed in good faith to negotiate a resolution of such dispute and, if not resolved through negotiations, such dispute shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with section 10.6 of this Agreement.
                  3. Use of Information
                  4. .

                    1. Confidentiality
                    2. . Each of the parties hereto shall hold all information concerning Cerro Verdethe Company and all information concerningthe operations of any other party heretoParticipant not otherwise generally available to the public through no act or omission of such other party (collectively, "Participant ("Confidential Information") in strict confidence and shall not use or disclose such information without the prior written consent of each party heretoParticipant affected to anyone other than directors, officers, employees, accountants, consultants and representatives of such partyParticipant and its Affiliates;Affiliates,provided that any such third party shall first execute a confidentiality agreement with each party heretoParticipant containing provisions substantially equivalent to this section 912 or such partyParticipant shall, and shall cause each of its Affiliates to, use best efforts to ensure that any such third party holds such information in strict confidence as contemplated by this section 9.12. Each party heretoParticipant shall, and shall cause each of its Affiliates to, use best efforts to ensure that other thirdt hird parties will not gain access to any Confidential Information through any act or omission on its part. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) in connection with compliance with law, the conduct of the business or operations of Cerro Verde,the Company, the development or financing of the Sulfide Project or the possible sale of an equity interest in Cerro Verde to a third party, ornewly issued shares of capital stock of the possible sale or treatment of concentrates to or by a third party,Company, PDC, the PD Participant Parents, the PD Participant and Cerro VerdeCompany and their respective Affiliates may disclose Confidential Information not involving information about BVN, SMM,SC, SGM and the Sumitomoany Participant (other than an Affiliate of PDC) without notice to any of the other parties hereto,Participants, (iiBVN, SMM,SC, SGM and the Sumitom oSumitomo Participant and their respective Affiliates may disclose Confidential Information not involving information about PDC, or Cerro Verdethe PD Participant or BVN to any Japanese corporation engaged in copper concentrate smelting that expresses an interest in the purchase or treatment of Cerro Verde concentrates;Company concentrates,provided that prior to making any such disclosure pursuant to this clause (ii)(ii) such party shall give writtenwritte n notice (identifying the third party being provided the Confidential Information and describing the general nature of such disclosure) to and secure the written consent of PDCthe PD Participant, (iii) any Participant may disclose Confidential Information to a prospective purchaser of any of its Shares and its corresponding rights under this Agreement,provided such purchaser first executes a confidentiality agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to each other Participant, and (iiiiv) any party heretoParticipant or any Affiliate thereof may disclose Confidential Information to any governmental agency or the export-import bank or developmentaldevelopment authority of the home country of the ultimate parent of such partyParticipant if it believes in good faith that such disclosure is required by applicable law, by governmental policy in such home country or by policy of suchexport-import bank or developmental authority;development authority,provided, that prior to making any such disclosure pursuant to this clause  (iii)(iv) such partyParticipant shall, unless prohibited by such governmental agency, give written notice (identifying such agency and describing the general nature of such disclosure) to, and consult with, each other party hereto. All obligations under this section 9shall terminate at the Final Closing upon the execution of theShareholders Agreement (but shall remain in full force and effect in the event this Agreement terminates pursuant to section 8).

                      Participant.
                    3. Conflict of Interest

                    . Each of the parties hereto agrees that Confidential Information concerning Cerro Verdethe Company, the Mines or a Project should not be disclosed to any such party or their Affiliates where because of a potential conflict of interest between such party (or Affiliates) and Cerro Verde,the Company, the Mines or a Project, such disclosure could reasonably be expected to result in an adverse effect,affect detrimentally, directly or indirectly, on Cerro Verde.the Company, the Mines or a Project. Accordingly, each party hereto may decline, in its sole discretion, to provide such Confidential Information to any party where it has a good faith belief that disclosure may involve such a potential conflict of interest.

              3. Miscellaneous.
              4. .

                  1. Implied Covenants. There are no implied covenants in this Agreement other than those of good faith and fair dealing.Notices
                  2. Notices. Any notice, advice, election, request, order, demand or other direction required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and in the English language, and (unless some other mode of giving the same is specified or accepted in writing by the recipient) shall be effective (a) when personally delivered during normal business hours to the addressee at the address designated for such delivery, (b) on the date of receipt specified in any return receipt if it shall have been deposited in the mails,mai ls, certified or registered with return receipt requested and postage thereon fully prepaid, or sent by prepaid overnight courier, in each case addressed to such address or (c) on the day it shall have been given by facsimile transmission (with written confirmation of receipt) to such address, whichever of the foregoing shall first occur. Until otherwise specified by notice, the addresses for a nyany such notice, advice, election, request, order, demand or other direction shall be:
                  3. if to the Sumitomo Participant, to it at:

                    SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands B.V.
                    c/o Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
                    11-3, 5-Chome, Shimbashi
                    Minato-ku,Tokyo105
                    Japan
                    Attention: General Manager, Mineral Resources Division
                    Telecopier:(81)-3-3436-7997

                    with a copy to:

                    Sumitomo Metal Mining America Inc.
                    Corresponsalia En Chile
                    Roger de Flor 2950, Piso 5
                    Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
                    Attention: General Manager
                    Telecopier: (56)-2-362-9289

                    Sumitomo Corporation Del Peru S.A.
                    Jr. San Martin No. 864 Ofi. 701
                    Miraflores, Lima, Peru
                    Attention: President
                    Telecopier: (51)-1-447-0506

                    ifto SMM, to it at:

                    SumitomoMetal Mining Co., Ltd.
                    11-3, 5-Chome, Shimbashi
                    Minato-ku,Tokyo105
                    Japan
                    Attention: General Manager, Mineral Resources Division
                    Telecopier (Fax):(81)-3-3436-7997

                    iftoSC, to it at:

                    SumitomoCorporation
                    1-8-11, Harumi
                    Chuo-ku,Tokyo 104-8610
                    Japan
                    Attention: General Manager, Nonferrous Metals and Raw Materials Department
                    Telecopier (Fax):(81)-3-5166-6423

                    if to SGM, to it at:

                    c/o Sumitomo Corporation
                    1-8-11, Harumi
                    Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8610
                    Japan
                    Attention: General Manager, Nonferrous Metals and Raw Materials Department
                    Telecopier (Fax): (81)-3-5166-6423

                    iftoif to the SumitomoPD Participant, to it at:

                    SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands B.V.Cyprus Climax Metals Company
                    c/o Phelps Dodge Mining Company
                    One N. Central Avenue
                    c/o Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
                    11-3, 5-Chome Shimbashi,
                    Minato-ku,TokyoPhoenix,105
                    Japan
                    Attention: General Manager, Mineral Resources Division
                    Telecopier (Fax): (81)-3-3436-7997

                    if to BVN, to it at:

                    Cia. De Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
                    Carlos Villaron 790
                    Urb. Santa Catalina
                    Lima 13, PeruArizona85004
                    Attention:President
                    Telecopier (Fax): (51)-1-471-7349Telephone: (602) 366-8100
                    Telecopier: (602) 366-7383

                    ifto PDC, to it at:with a copy to:

                    PhelpsDodge Corporation
                    One N. Central Avenue
                    Phoenix,Arizona85004
                    Attention:General Counsel
                    Telephone: (602) 366-8100
                    Telecopier (Fax):Telecopier: (602) 366-7321366-7383

                    if to CAMC,BVN, to it at:

                    Cia. De Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
                    Carlos Villaran 790
                    Urb, Santa Catalina, Lima 13, Peru
                    Attention: President
                    Telecopier: (51)-1-471-7349

                    if to PDC, to it at:

                    Phelps Dodge Corporation
                    One N. Central Avenue
                    Phoenix,Arizona85004
                    Attention: General Counsel
                    Telecopier (Fax): (602) 366-7321

                    if to CMC, to it at:

                    One N. Central Avenue
                    Phoenix,Arizona85004
                    Attention: General Counsel
                    Telecopier (Fax): (602) 366-7321

                    ifto the PD Participant, to it at:

                    One N. Central Avenue
                    Phoenix, Arizona 85004
                    Attention: General Counsel
                    Telephone: (602) 366-8100
                    Telecopier: (602) 366-7383Telecopier (Fax): (602) 366-7321

                    if to Cerro Verde,the Company, to it at:

                    Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.
                    Av. Alfonso Ugarte #304
                    Cercado, Arequipa,Peru
                    Attention:Attention: General Manager
                    Telecopier (Fax):054-28-33-76

                    if to the Operator, to it at:

                    Minera Phelps Dodge del Perú S.A.C.
                    Av. Camino Real 348
                    Torre El Pilar, Piso 14
                    San Isidro, Lima
                    Attention: General Manager
                    Telecopier (Fax): (51)-1-422-2787

                    Whenever pursuant to any provision of this Agreement notice, advice, election, request, order, demand or other direction is to be given to any Participant, or the Board, a copy thereof shall also be given to each Participant and the Operator.

                  4. Entire Agreement
                  5. . This Agreement and the exhibits hereto constituteconstitutes the entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedesupersedes all prior oral and written discussions representations and understandings.

                  6. Waiver,Amendments, Waivers, etc.
                    1. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by a written instrument signed by all of the parties hereto. No party hereto shall be bound by any modification or amendment of this Agreement or waiver of any provision hereof unless such modification, amendment or waiver is set forth in a written instrument signed by each of the parties hereto. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, failure on the part of any party hereto to exercise any right hereunder or to insist upon strict compliance by any other party hereto with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such right, term, covenant or condition. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to be a waiver by any of the parties hereto of any rights or remedies such party may have against any other party for failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement and, except as provided in section 10.613.8 or otherwise provided in this Agreement, no remedy or right herein conferred is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy or right, but every such remedy or right shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy or right herein conferred or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity.
                    2. THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT EXPRESSLY WAIVE AND FOREGO ANY RIGHT TO RECOVER PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, LOST PROFITS, CONSEQUENTIAL OR SIMILAR DAMAGES IN ANY ARBITRATION, LAWSUIT, LITIGATION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RESULTING FROM ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
                  7. No Other Arrangements or Agreements. Each Participant hereby represents and warrants to the Company and to each other Participant that, except for this Agreement and the Participation Agreement, it has not entered into or agreed to be bound by any other arrangements or agreements of any kind with any other party with respect to Equity Securities, including, but not limited to, arrangements or agreements with respect to the acquisition or disposition of Equity Securities or any interest therein or the voting of shares of Common Stock (whether or not such agreements and arrangements are with the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or other Participants) and each Participant agrees that, except as expressly permitted under this Agreement, it will not enter into any such other arrangements or agreements with respect to the voting of shares of Common Stock (whether or not such agreements and arrangements are with the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or other Participants).Severability
                  8. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application of any provision hereof to any party hereto or set of circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such provision to any other party or set of circumstances shall not be affected unless the provisions held invalid shall substantially impair the benefits of the remaining portions of this Agreement.

                  9. Governing Law
                  10. . This Agreement and (unless otherwise expressly provided) all amendments and supplements to, and all consents and waivers pursuant to, this Agreement shall in all respects be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws of theStatethe State of New York,, without giving effect to the conflict of laws rules thereof to the extent they are not mandatorily applicable by statute and would require or permit the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.

                  11. Arbitration
                  12. .

                    1. Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the subject matter of this Agreement, or the breach, termination, or invalidity hereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the UNCITRALArbitrationUNCITRAL Arbitration Rulesin effect on the date of this Agreement.such dispute, controversy, claim, breach, termination or invalidity arises. The arbitration shall be the sole and exclusive forum for resolution of the dispute, controversy or claim and the award shall be final and binding to the extent permitted by law. Judgment thereon may be entered by any court having jurisdiction.
                      1. There shall be three arbitrators, each of whom shall be disinterested in the dispute, controversy or claim and shall have no connection with any party to this Agreement.Agreement or any of their Affiliates. The party to this Agreement initiating arbitration ("Claimant") and the party to this Agreement named as defendant ("Defendant") shall each name an arbitrator, as provided in Article 7 of the UNCITRALArbitrationUNCITRAL Arbitration Rulesspecified above. In the event that more than two parties to this Agreement are involved in the arbitration, the parties to this Agreement shall compose themselves into two sides for purposes of arbitration, and the Claimant and Defendant holding, directly or through its Affiliates, the largest Respective Share shall each nominate an arbitrator for all Claimants or Defendants, as the case ma ymay be. The two arbitrators so chosen shall select a third arbitrator. If the parties are unable to comprise themselves into two sides, as described above, then the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") shall appoint all three arbitrators.
                      2. Should the services of an appointment or administering authority be necessary, the appointment or administering authority shall be the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). If any party or side to this Agreement entitled to name an arbitrator should abstain from doing so, theAAAthe AAA shall appoint such arbitrator, unless the abstaining party is one of two or more Claimants or Defendants, in which case the Claimant or Defendant, as the case may be, holding, directly or through its Affiliates, the next largest Respective Share shall nominate the arbitrator. No party to this Agreement shall require theAAAthe AAA to (but the AAA may)designate as arbitrator a person of a nationality other than the nationalities of the parties to this Agreement involved in the arbitration.
                      3. In the event that more than two parties to this Agreement are involved in the arbitration and such parties are unable to compose themselves into two sides, at the request of any such party the administering authority shall make any arrangements (including without limitation, determining the composition of two sides for the purposes of arbitration or designating the members of the arbitral tribunal) necessary to effect the resolution of the dispute by a means fair to each of the disputing parties to this Agreement, and the administering authority's decision as to such arrangements shall be final and binding.
                      4. The place of arbitration shall beNew York,be New York,. New York. The arbitration shall be conducted in the English language and any foreign language documents presented at such arbitration shall be accompanied by an English translation thereof. The arbitrators shall apply the lawslaw of theStatethe State of New York.York.
                      5. The parties to this Agreement consent that theUnitedthe United States District Courtsfor theSouthernthe Southern District of New Yorkand for theDistrictthe District of Arizonashall each have non-exclusive jurisdiction with respect to all aspects of the enforcement of the arbitration provisions of this Agreement.
                    2. Binding Effect
                    3. . This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns hereunder.

                      hereunder;providedhowever, that the Company is not bound by, and expressly disclaims any responsibility for enforcing, the provisions in section 9 or section 11.8.
                    4. Headings
                    5. . The section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement.

                    6. Counterparts
                    7. . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original; such counterparts together shall constitute but one Agreement.

                    8. Supermajority Voting. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that Article 41 of the estatutos of the Company adopted as of the date hereof provides for supermajority voting with respect to certain matters identified therein. In addition, each party to this Agreement agrees that it shall cause the Company and each member of the Board that it nominates to comply with, and to take all such actions necessary or advisable to ensure the continued enforceability of Article 41 of the estatutos of the Company adopted as of the date hereof.Assignability

              5. Conflicts with Estatutos or Peruvian Law. Except as contemplated by section 6.6,neitherNotwithstanding the meaning or interpretation of any other term of this Agreement, nornothing in this Agreement shall require the Company to take or omit any right, remedy, obligationaction that would conflict with any term of its estatutos or liability arising hereunder or by reason hereof shall be assignable by any party hereto.

              6. Peruvian Company Law.

          [End of Text; Signature Pages Follow on Page S-1]Follow]

          INWITNESSIN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day and year first above written.

          SUMITOMOMETAL MINING
          CO., LTD.SMM CERRO VERDE NETHERLANDS B.V.

          By:By/S/ ICHIRO ABE
          Name: Ichiro Abe
          Title: Managing Director

          SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO., LTD.

          By/S/ ICHIRO ABE
          Name: Ichiro Abe
          Title: Executive Officer,

          General Manager of Mineral

          Mineral Resources Division

          SUMITOMOCORPORATIONSUMITOMO CORPORATION

          By:By/S/ MITSUHIKO YAMADA
          Name: Mitsuhiko Yamada
          Title: Corporate Officer,

          General Manager, Mineral

          Mineral Resources Division, No. 1

          SUMMIT GLOBAL MANAGEMENT B.V.

          By:By/S/ TAKESHI OKUBO
          Name: Takeshi Okubo
          Title: Managing Director

          PHELPSDODGE

          CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS COMPANY

          By/S/ TIMOTHY R. SNIDER
          Name: Timothy R. Snider
          Title: President and Chief Operating Officer

          PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION

          By:By/S/ KALIDAS V. MADHAYPEDDIMADHAVPEDDI
          Name: Kalidas V. Madhavpeddi
          Title: Senior Vice President

          CYPRUSAMAX MINERALS COMPANY

          By:/S/ KALIDAS V. MADHAYPEDDI
          Name: Kalidas V. Madhavpeddi
          Title: Senior Vice President

          CYPRUSMETALS COMPANY

          By:/S/ TIMOTHY SNYDER
          Name: Timothy R. Snider
          Title: President

          CYPRUSCLIMAX METALS COMPANY

          By:/S/ TIMOTHY SNYDER
          Name: Timothy R. Snider
          Title: President

          SOCIEDADMINERA CERRO VERDES.A.A.

          By:/S/ JEFF MONTEITH
          Name Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A.

          By/S/ JEFF MONTEITH
          Title:Name: Jeff Monteith Contralor
          Title: Comptroller

          COMPAÑIA DE MINAS BUENAVENTURA S.A.A.

          By:By/S/ ROQUE BENAVIDES
          Name: Roque Benavides
          Title: President and CEO

          Exhibit 12.1

           

          Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

          Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

           

          I, Roque Benavides Ganoza, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.;

          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's most recent fiscal quarter (the company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

          5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

           

           

          Date: May 27, 2005Dated: June 6, 2006

           

          /S/ ROQUE BENAVIDES GANOZA
          Roque Benavides Ganoza
          Chief Executive Officer

          Exhibit 12.2

           

          Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

          Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

           

          I, Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.;

          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's most recent fiscal quarter (the company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

          5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

           

          Date: May 27, 2005Dated: June 6, 2006

           

          /S/ CARLOS E. GÁLVEZ PINILLOS
          Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos
          Chief Financial Officer

          Exhibit 13.1

           

          Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

          Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

           

          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

          1. I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the "Company").

          2. (A) The Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 2004 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

          (B) The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

          Dated: May 27, 2005June 6, 2006

          /S/ ROQUE BENAVIDES GANOZA

          Roque Benavides Ganoza

          Chief Executive Officer

          Exhibit 13.2

          Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

          Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

           

          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

          1. I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the "Company").

          2. (A) The Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 2004 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

          (B) The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

          Dated: May 27, 2005June 6, 2006

          /S/ CARLOS E. GÁLVEZ PINILLOS

          Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos

          Chief Financial Officer