Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 20-F



(Mark One)

o

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ORor

ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122014

ORor

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ORor

o

 

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of event requiring this shell company report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .report



For the transition period from                                        to                                       

Commission File Number: 001-31368



Sanofi
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Sanofi
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A
(Translation of registrant's name into English)

France
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

54, Rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France
(Address of principal executive offices)

N/A
(Translation of registrant's name into English)

France
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

54, Rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France
(Address of principal executive offices)



Karen Linehan, Executive Vice President Legal Affairs and General Counsel
54, Rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France. Fax: 011 + 33 1 53 77 43 03. Tel: 011 + 33 1 53 77 40 00

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Karen Linehan, Senior Vice President Legal Affairs and General Counsel
54, Rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France. Fax: 011 + 33 1 53 77 43 03. Tel: 011 + 33 1 53 77 40 00
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class: Name of each exchange on which registered:
American Depositary Shares, each
representing one half of one ordinary share, par
value €2 per share
 New York Stock Exchange

Ordinary shares, par value €2 per share

 

New York Stock Exchange
(for (for listing purposes only)

Contingent Value Rights

 

NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2014 was:
Ordinary shares: 1,319,367,445

The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or
common stock as of December 31, 2012 was:

Ordinary shares: 1,340,918,811
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405
of the Securities Act.
YES ý    NO o.
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
YES o    NO ý.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES ý    NO o.

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    YES o    NO ý.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý                        No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o                        No ýo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerý Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filero

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP o    International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ý    Other o


U.S. GAAP o
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board ý

Other o

If "Other" has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 o                        Item 18 o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES    Yes o                        NONo ý.

   


Table of Contents


PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

        The consolidated financial statements contained in this annual report on Form 20-F have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and with IFRS as adopted by the European Union, as of December 31, 2012.2014.



        Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms "Sanofi," the "Company," the "Group," "we," "our" or "us" refer to Sanofi and its consolidated subsidiaries.

        All references herein to "United States" or "U.S." are to the United States of America, references to "dollars" or "$" are to the currency of the United States, references to "France" are to the Republic of France, and references to "euro" and "€"are to the currency of the European Union member states (including France) participating in the European Monetary Union.

        Brand names appearing in this annual report are trademarks of Sanofi and/or its affiliates, with the exception of:

        Not all trademarks related to investigational agents have been authorized as of the date of this annual report by the relevant health authorities; for instance Lyxumia® trade name has not been approved by the FDA.



        The data relating to market shares and ranking information for pharmaceutical products, in particular as presented in "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.6. Markets — B.6.1. Marketing and distribution," are based on sales data from IMS Health MIDAS (IMS), retail and hospital, for calendar year 2012,2014, in constant euros (unless otherwise indicated).


Table of Contents

        While we believe that the IMS sales data we present below are generally useful comparative indicators for our industry, they may not precisely match the sales figures published by the companies that sell the products (including our company and other pharmaceutical companies). In particular, the rules used by IMS to attribute the sales of a product covered by an alliance or license agreement do not always exactly match the rules of the agreement.


Table of Contents

        In order to allow a reconciliation with our basis of consolidation as defined in "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Presentation of Net Sales," IMS data shown in the present document have been adjusted and include:

        Data relative to market shares and ranking information presented herein for our vaccines business are based on internal estimates unless stated otherwise.

        Data relative to market shares and ranking information presented herein for our animal health business are based on sales data from Vetnosis unless stated otherwise.



        Product indications described in this annual report are composite summaries of the major indications approved in the product's principal markets. Not all indications are necessarily available in each of the markets in which the products are approved. The summaries presented herein for the purpose of financial reporting do not substitute for careful consideration of the full labeling approved in each market.




CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This annual report contains forward-looking statements. We may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in our periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 6-K, in our annual report to shareholders, in our offering circulars and prospectuses, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees to third parties. Examples of such forward-looking statements include:

        This information is based on data, assumptions and estimates considered as reasonable by the Company as at the date of this annual report and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

        Words such as "believe," "anticipate," "plan," "expect," "intend," "target," "estimate," "project," "predict," "forecast," "guideline," "should" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.

        Forward-looking statements involve inherent, known and unknown, risks and uncertainties associated with the regulatory, economic, financial and competitive environment, and other factors that could cause future results and objectives to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

        Risk factors which could affect the future results and cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements are discussed under "Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors". Additional risks, not currently known or considered immaterial by the Group, may have the same unfavorable effect and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

        Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Other than required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update them in light of new information or future developments.


Table of Contents

Abbreviations used in the Form 20-F

ADR/ADSAmerican Depositary Receipt/American Depositary Share
AFEPAssociation française des entreprises privées (French association of large companies)
AMFAutorité des marchés financiers (the French market regulator)
ANDAAbbreviated New Drug Application
ECBEuropean Central Bank
BLABiologic License Application
BMSBristol-Myers Squibb
CGUCash generating unit
CHCConsumer Health Care
CHMPCommittee for Medicinal Products for Human Use
CNSCentral Nervous System
COSOCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
COVALISHealth risk prevention committee
CSRCorporate Social Responsibility
CVMPCommittee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use
CVRContingent Value Right
ECHAEuropean Chemicals Agency
ECOVALInternal committee for assessing the environmental risks of our pharmaceutical products
EMAEuropean Medicines Agency
EMTNEuro Medium Term Note
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPSEarnings per share
EUEuropean Union
FCPAU.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
FCPEFonds commun de placement d'entreprise (Corporate investment funds)
FDAU.S. Food and Drug Administration
GAVIGlobal Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation
GLP-1Glucagon-like peptide-1
GMPGood Manufacturing Practice
GRIGlobal Reporting Initiative
HSEHealth, Safety and Environment
IASBInternational Accounting Standards Board
IFRSInternational Financial Reporting Standards
ILOInternational Labor Organisation
LEEDLeadership in Energy and Environmental Design
LSDLysosomal storage disorder
MEDEFMouvement des entreprises de France (French business confederation)
NASDAQNational Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations
NDANew Drug Application
OECDOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OTCOver The Counter
PaHOPan American Health Organisation
PRACPharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee
R&DResearch & Development
REACHRegistration, Evaluation, Authorization and restriction of Chemicals
ROAReturn on assets
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
TRIBIOInternal biological risk committee
TSRTotal Shareholder Return
TSUTherapeutic Strategic Unit
UNICEFUnited Nations Children's Fund
USDAUnited States Department of Agriculture
WHOWorld Health Organization

Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I    
  Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers 1
  Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable 1
  Item 3. Key Information 1
    A. Selected Financial Data 1
    B. Capitalization and Indebtedness 3
    C. Reasons for Offer and Use of Proceeds 3
    D. Risk Factors 4
  Item 4. Information on the Company 19
    A. History and Development of the Company 2120
    B. Business Overview 2221
    C. Organizational Structure 8380
    D. Property, Plant and Equipment 8481
  Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments 8987
  Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 9088
  Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees 148137
    A. Directors and Senior Management 148137
    B. Compensation 167160
    C. Board Practices 181178
    D. Employees 187183
    E. Share Ownership 189185
  Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions 194189
    A. Major Shareholders 194189
    B. Related Party Transactions 195190
    C. Interests of Experts and Counsel 196190
  Item 8. Financial Information 197191
    A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information 197191
    B. Significant Changes 201195
  Item 9. The Offer and Listing 202196
    A. Offer and Listing Details 202196
    B. Plan of Distribution 203197
    C. Markets 203197
    D. Selling Shareholders 203197
    E. Dilution 203197
    F. Expenses of the Issue 203197
  Item 10. Additional Information 204198
    A. Share Capital 204198
    B. Memorandum and Articles of Association 204198
    C. Material Contracts 221214
    D. Exchange Controls 223215
    E. Taxation 223215
    F. Dividends and Paying Agents 228220
    G. Statement by Experts 228220
    H. Documents on Display 228220
    I. Subsidiary Information 228220
  Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 229221
  Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities 234225
Part II    
  Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies 242233
  Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders 242233
  Item 15. Controls and Procedures 242233
  Item 16. [Reserved] 242233
  Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert 242233
  Item 16B. Code of Ethics 243234
  Item 16C. Principal Accountants' Fees and Services 243234
  Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees 243234
  Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers 243234
  Item 16F. Change in Registrant's Certifying Accountant 244234
  Item 16G. Corporate Governance 244235
  Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure 245235
Part III    
  Item 17. Financial Statements 246236
  Item 18. Financial Statements 246236
  Item 19. Exhibits 246236

Table of Contents


PART I

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

        N/A


Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

        N/A


Item 3. Key Information

A. Selected Financial Data


SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The tables below set forth selected consolidated financial data for Sanofi. These financial data are derived from the Sanofi consolidated financial statements. The Sanofi consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012 are included in Item 18 of this annual report.

        The consolidated financial statements of Sanofi for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012 have been prepared in compliance with IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and with IFRS adopted by the European Union as of December 31, 2012.2014. The term "IFRS" refers collectively to international accounting and financial reporting standards (IAS and IFRS) and to interpretations of the interpretations committees (SIC and IFRIC) mandatorily applicable as of December 31, 2012.2014.


Table of Contents

        Sanofi reports its financial results in euros.


Table of Contents


SELECTED CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION


 As of and for the year ended December 31,
  As of and for the year ended December 31,
 
(€ million, except per share data)
 2012
 2011
 2010
 2009
 2008
 2014

2013(a)

2012(a)

2011

2010

 
 
IFRS Income statement data (a) 
IFRS Income statement data (b):           

Net sales

 34,947 33,389 32,367 29,785 27,568  33,770 32,951 34,947 33,389 32,367  

Gross profit

 24,839 24,156 24,638 23,125 21,480  23,08022,315 24,859 24,193 24,638  

Operating income

 6,337 5,731 6,535 6,435 4,394  6,1435,105 6,430 5,861 6,535  

Net income attributable to equity holders of Sanofi

 4,967 5,693 5,467 5,265 3,851  4,3903,716 4,888 5,646 5,467  
Basic earnings per share (€) (a)/(b) : 
Basic earnings per share (€) (b)/(c):           

Net income attributable to equity holders of Sanofi

 3.76 4.31 4.19 4.03 2.94  3.34 2.81 3.70 4.27 4.19  
Diluted earnings per share (€) (a)/(c) : 
Diluted earnings per share (€) (b)/(d):           

Net income attributable to equity holders of Sanofi

 3.74 4.29 4.18 4.03 2.94  3.30 2.77 3.68 4.26 4.18  
IFRS Balance sheet data 
IFRS Balance sheet data:           

Goodwill and other intangible assets

 58,265 62,221(g) 44,411 43,480 43,423  53,740 52,529 58,265 62,221 44,411  

Total assets

 100,407 100,668(g) 85,264 80,251 71,987  97,39296,055 100,399 100,672 85,264  

Outstanding share capital

 2,646 2,647 2,610 2,618 2,611  2,6202,641 2,646 2,647 2,610  

Equity attributable to equity holders of Sanofi

 57,338 56,203(g) 53,097 48,322 44,866  56,12056,904 57,352 56,193 53,097  

Long term debt

 10,719 12,499 6,695 5,961 4,173  13,27610,414 10,719 12,499 6,695  

Cash dividend paid per share (€) (d)

 2.77 (e) 2.65 2.50 2.40 2.20 

Cash dividend paid per share ($) (d)(f)

 3.65 (e) 3.43 3.34 3.46 3.06 
 

Cash dividend paid per share (€) (e)

 2.85&zwsp;(f)2.80 2.77 2.65 2.50  

Cash dividend paid per share ($) (e)/(g)

 3.46&zwsp;(f)3.86 3.65 3.43 3.34  
(a)
Includes the impacts of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report).
(b)
The results of operations of Merial, for 2010, and 2009, previously reported as held-for-exchange, have been reclassified and included in net income of continuing operations in accordance with IFRS 5.36., following the announcement that Merial and Intervet/Schering-Plough are to be maintained as two separate businesses operating independently.
(b)(c)
Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period used to compute basic earnings per share, equal to 1,315.8 million shares in 2014, 1,323.1 million shares in 2013, 1,319.5 million shares in 2012, 1,321.7 million shares in 2011, and 1,305.3 million shares in 2010, 1,305.9 million shares in 2009, and 1,309.3 million shares in 2008.2010.
(c)(d)
Based on the weighted average in each period of the number of shares outstanding plus stock options and restricted shares with a potentially dilutive effect; i.e., 1,331.1 million shares in 2014, 1,339.1 million shares in 2013, 1,329.6 million shares in 2012, 1,326.7 million shares in 2011, and 1,308.2 million shares in 2010, 1,307.4 million shares in 2009, and 1,310.9 million shares in 2008.2010.
(d)(e)
Each American Depositary Share, or ADS, represents one half of one share.
(e)(f)
Dividends for 20122014 will be proposed for approval at the annual general meeting scheduled for May 3, 2013.4, 2015.
(f)(g)
Based on the relevant year-end exchange rate.
(g)
In accordance with IFRS 3 (Business Combinations), Sanofi made adjustments during the Genzyme purchase price allocation period to some of the provisional amounts recognized in 2011 (see Note D.1.2. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report).

Table of Contents


SELECTED EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION

        The following table sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rates for the euro from 20082010 through March 20132015 expressed in U.S. dollars per euro. The information concerning the U.S. dollar exchange rate is based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the "Noon Buying Rate"). We provide the exchange rates below solely for your convenience. We do not represent that euros were, could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any other rate. For information regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on our results of operations, see "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects" and "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk."


 Period-
end Rate

 Average
Rate (1)

 High
 Low
  Period-
end Rate

 Average
Rate (1)

 High
 Low
  
 

 (U.S. dollar per euro)
  (U.S. dollar per euro)
2008  1.39 1.47 1.60 1.24 
2009  1.43 1.40 1.51 1.25 
2010  1.33 1.32 1.45 1.20  1.33 1.32 1.45 1.20  
2011  1.30 1.40 1.49 1.29  1.30 1.40 1.49 1.29  
2012  1.32 1.29 1.35 1.21  1.32 1.29 1.35 1.21  
2013 1.38 1.33 1.38 1.28  
2014 1.21 1.32 1.39 1.21  
Last 6 months            
2012  
2014          

September

  1.29 1.29 1.31 1.26  1.26 1.29 1.31 1.26  

October

  1.30 1.30 1.31 1.29  1.25 1.27 1.28 1.25  

November

  1.30 1.28 1.30 1.27  1.24 1.25 1.26 1.24  

December

  1.32 1.31 1.33 1.29  1.21 1.23 1.25 1.21  
2013  
2015          

January

  1.36 1.33 1.36 1.30  1.13 1.16 1.20 1.13  

February

  1.31 1.33 1.37 1.31  1.13 1.12 1.15 1.12  

March (2)

  1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30  1.07 1.10 1.12 1.07  
 
(1)
The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month during the relevant period for the full year average, and on each business day of the month for the monthly average. The latest available Noon Buying Rate being March 1, 2013,6, 2015, we have used European Central Bank Rates for the period from March 4, 20139, 2015 through March 6, 2013.10, 2015.
(2)
In each case, measured through March 6, 2013.10, 2015.

        On March 6, 201310, 2015 the European Central Bank Rate was 1.30351.0738 per euro.


B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

        N/A


C. Reasons for Offer and Use of Proceeds

        N/A


Table of Contents


D. Risk Factors

        Important factors that could cause actual financial, business, research or operating results to differ materially from expectations are disclosed in this annual report, including without limitation the following risk factors. In addition to the risks listed below, we may be subject to other material risks that as of the date of this report are not currently known to us or that we deem immaterial at this time.

Risks Relating to Legal and Regulatory Matters

We rely on our patents and proprietary rights to provide exclusive rights to market certain of our products, and if such patents and other rights were limited or circumvented, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

        Through patent and other proprietary rights such as data exclusivity or supplementary protection certificates in Europe, for instance, we hold exclusivity rights for a number of our research-based products. However, the protection that we are able to obtain varies in its duration and scope from product to product and country to country andcountry. This protection may not be sufficient to maintain effective product exclusivity because of local variationsdifferences in the patents, differences in national lawlaws or applicable legal systems, developmentor developments in law or jurisprudence, orwhich may give rise to inconsistent judgments.

        Moreover, patent and other proprietary rights do not always provide effective protection for our products. Manufacturers of generic products or biosimilars are increasingly seeking to challenge patent coverage before the patents expire, and manufacturers of biosimilars or interchangeable versions of the products are seeking to have their version of the product approved before the exclusivity period ends. Furthermore, in an infringement suit against a third party, we may not prevail and the decision rendered may not consider that our patent or other proprietary rights are valid, enforceable or infringed. Our competitors may also successfully avoid patents, for example, through design innovation, and we may not hold sufficient evidence of infringement to bring suit.

        In certain cases, to terminate or avoid patent litigation, we or our partners may be required to obtain licenses from the holders of third-party intellectual property rights that cover aspects of our existing and future products in order to manufacture, use or sell them. Any payments under these licenses may reduce our profits from such products and we may not be able to obtain these licenses on favorable terms or at all. If we fail to obtain a required license for a country where the valid third-party intellectual property right exists or are unable to alter the design of our technology to fall outside the scope of third-party intellectual property rights, we may be unable to market some of our products in certain countries, which may limit our profitability.

        Also, some countries are becoming more likely tomay consider granting a compulsory license to use patents protecting an innovator's product; India's decision of March 2012 granting a compulsory licenseproduct, which limits the protection granted to a generic company to a Bayer patent is illustrative of this risk.such products.

        We are involved in litigation worldwide to enforce certain of theseour patent rights against generics, and proposed generics and biosimilars (see "Item 8. Financial Information — A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information — Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings" for additional information). Moreover, patent rights are limited in timeinformation including on litigation related to Lantus® one of the Group's flagship products) of our small molecule and do not always provide effective protection for our products: competitors may successfully avoid patents through design innovation, we may not hold sufficient evidence of infringement to bring suit, manufacturers of generic products are also increasingly seeking to challenge patents before they expire, and our infringement claim may not result in a decision that our rights are valid, enforceable or infringed.

biological pharmaceutical products. Even in cases where we ultimately prevail in ouran infringement claim, legal remedies available for harm caused to us by infringing products may be inadequate to make us whole. A competitor may launch a generic or a biosimilar product "at risk" before the initiation or completion of the court proceedings, and the court may decline to grant us a preliminary injunction to halt further "at risk" sales and remove the infringing product from the market. Additionally, while we would be entitled to obtain damages in such a case, the amount that we may ultimately be awarded and able to collect may be insufficient to compensate all harm caused to us.

        Further, our A successful assertion ofresult against a competing product for a given patent against one competing productor in a specific country is not necessarily predictive of our future success or failure in asserting the same patent against a secondanother competing product because of such factors as possible differences in the formulations. Also a successful result in one country may not predict successor in another country because of local variations in the patents and patent laws.

        Further, we have increased the proportion of biological therapeutics in our pipeline relative to traditional small molecule pharmaceutical products. We expect to face increasing competition from biosimilars in the future. With the accelerated regulatory pathways provided in the U.S. and Europe for biosimilar drug approval, biosimilars can be a threat to the exclusivity of any biological therapeutics we sell or may market in the future and can pose the same issues as the small molecule generic threat described hereinabove. To the extent valid third-party patent rights cover ourthat governments could adopt more permissive approval frameworks (for instance regarding the duration of data exclusivity that could be shortened, or the scope of new products we or our partners mayreceiving data exclusivity that could be required to obtain licenses from the holders of these patents in order to manufacture, use or sell these products,narrowed) and payments under these licenses may reduce our profits from these products. We may notcompetitors could be able to obtain these licenses on favorable terms,broader marketing approval for biosimilars including as a substitutable product, our products would become subject to increased competition (see also "Changes in the laws or at all.regulations that apply to us could affect the Group's


Table of Contents

business, results of operations and financial condition"). If we fail to obtain a required license or are unable to alter the designbiosimilar version of our technology to fall outside the scope of a third-party patent, we may be unable to market someone of our products which may limitwere approved, it could reduce our profitability.sales of that product.

        However, with our presence as a manufacturer of generics and anticipated entry into biosimilars, we will utilize patent challenge strategies against other innovators' patents, similar to those of long-established generic companies, but there is no assurance that these strategies will be successful.

Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        Product liability is a significant business risk for any pharmaceutical company, and the Group's ongoing diversification could increase our product liability exposure (see notably "— The diversificationas liability claims relating to our new businesses may differ with regards to their nature, scope and level, from the types of product liability claims that we have handled in the Group's business exposes us to increased risks." below).past. Substantial damage awards and/or settlements have been handed down — notably in the United States and other common law jurisdictions — against pharmaceutical companies based on claims for injuries allegedly caused by the use of their products. Such claims can also be accompanied by consumer fraud claims by customers or third-party payers seeking reimbursement of the cost of the product.


        We are currently defending a number of product liability claims (See Note D.22.a) to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report) and there can be no assurance that the Group will be successful in defending against these claims or will not face additional claims in the future.

        Often, the side effect profile of pharmaceutical drugs cannot be fully established based on preapproval clinical studies involving only several hundred to several thousand patients. Routine review and analysis of the continually growing body of post-marketing safety surveillance and clinical trials provide additional information — for example, potential evidence of rare, population-specific or long-term adverse reactions or of drug interactions that were not observed in preapproval clinical studies — and may cause product labeling to evolve, including restrictions of therapeutic indications, new contraindications, warnings or precautions, and occasionally even the suspension or withdrawal of a product marketing authorization. SeveralFollowing the implementation of European pharmacovigilance legislation in 2012, the Company and the European Regulatory Agencies (under the supervision of the PRAC (Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee)) have reinforced their systematic and intensive safety signal detection systems which may detect safety issues even with mature products that have been on the market for considerable time. As a result market authorization suspension or withdrawal may take place. Following a recall or a withdrawal, pharmaceutical companies have withdrawn products from the market because of newly detected or suspected adverse reactions to their products, and as a result of such withdrawal nowcan face significant product liability claims. We are currently defending a number of product liability claims (See Note D.22.a) to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report) and there can be no assurance that the Group will be successful in defending against each of these claims or will not face additional claims in the future.

        Furthermore, we commercialize several devices (notably those using new technologiestechnologies) which, in case of malfunction, could cause unexpected damages and lead to ourproduct liability claims (see "— We are increasingly dependent on information technologies and networks." below)).

        Although we continue to insure a portion of our product liability with third-party carriers, product liability coverage is increasingly difficult and costly to obtain,obtain. This is true particularly in the United States, and especially for genericized products where Sanofi is the innovator, as innovators have been held liable in some U.S. jurisdictions for damages caused by a product commercialized by generic manufacturers. In the future, it is possible that self-insurance may become the sole commercially reasonable means available for managing the product liability financial risk of our pharmaceutical and vaccines businesses (see "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.9. Insurance and Risk Coverage"). In case of self-insurance, the legal costs that we would bear for handling such claims and potential indemnifications to be paid to claimants could affect our financial condition.

        Due to insurance conditions, even when the Group has insurance coverage, recoveries from insurers may not be totally successful. Moreover, the insolvency of a carrier could negatively affect our ability to achieve the practical recovery of the coverage for which we have already paid a premium.

        Product liability claims, regardless of their merits or the ultimate success of the Group's defense, are costly, divert managementmanagement's attention, may harm our reputation and can impact the demand for our products. Substantial product liability claims if successful, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our products and manufacturing facilities are subject to significant government regulations and approvals, which are often costly and could result in adverse consequences to our business if we fail to anticipate the regulations, comply with them and/or maintain the approvals.

        Obtaining marketing authorization is a long and regulated process requiring extensive documentation and data to be provided to the regulatory authorities. Regulatory processes differ from one authority to another. Either at the


Table of Contents

time of the filing of the application for a marketing authorization or later during its review, each regulatory authority may impose its own requirements, including requiring local clinical studies, and may delay or refuse to grant approval, even though a product has already been approved in another country.

        Health authorities are increasingly focusing on product safety and on the risk/benefit profile of pharmaceuticals products. In particular, the FDA and the EMA have increased their requirements particularly in terms of the volume of data needed to demonstrate a product's efficacy and safety. Even after regulatory approval, marketed products are subject to continual review, risk evaluations or comparative effectiveness studies. These requirements have increased the costs associated with maintaining regulatory approvals and achieving reimbursement for our products. Post-regulatory approval reviews and data analyses can lead to the issuance of recommendations by government agencies, health professional and patient or other specialized organizations regarding the use of products; for example, a recommendation to limit the patient scope of a drug's indication, impose marketing restrictions, or suspend or withdraw the product can result in a reduction in sales volume, as well as an increased risk of litigation.

        Moreover, to monitor our compliance with applicable regulations, the FDA, the EMA and comparable agencies in other jurisdictions routinely conduct inspections of our facilities and may identify potential deficiencies. For example, further to the Warning Letter received from the FDA in July 2012 and following inspections conducted at manufacturing facilities in Canada and France, Sanofi Pasteur has submitted a remediation plan to the FDA. In 2014 the issues raised in the 2012 Warning Letter were waived by the FDA. If we were to receive another Warning Letter following the inspection of one of our facilities and if we fail to adequately respond to that or any other warning letter identifying a deficiency further to a control, or otherwise fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, under the applicable pharmaceutical regulation, we could be subject to enforcement, remedial and/or punitive actions by the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities.

        In addition, to the extent that new regulations raise the costs of obtaining and maintaining product authorizations, or limit the economic value of a new product to its originator, the growth prospects of our industry and of the Group are diminished. Approximately 70% of our current development portfolio consists of biological products that may in the future bring new therapeutic responses to current unmet medical needs, but that may also lead to more technical constraints and costly investments from an industrial standpoint as biological products are complex to produce. These constraints and costs could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Claims and investigations relating to compliance, competition law, marketing practices, pricing, compliance issues, as well as other legal matters, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        The marketing of our products is heavily regulated. The Group's business covers an extremely wide range of activities worldwide and involves numerous partners. DespiteWe have adopted a Code of Ethics that calls for employees to comply with applicable legislation and regulations, as well as with the specific values and rules of conduct set forth in that Code. We have also set up policies and procedures which are designed to help ensure that we, our employees, officers, agents, intermediaries and other third parties comply with applicable laws and regulations (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the UK Bribery Act, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and other anti-bribery laws and regulations).

        Notwithstanding these efforts, anydeviations may occur and there can be no assurance that we and/or our officers will not face liability under laws and regulations for actions taken with respect to our business.

        Any failure to comply directly or indirectly (including as a result of a business partners' breach) with lawthe laws and regulations applicable to us could lead to substantial liabilities.liabilities and harm the Group's reputation. Governments and regulatory authorities around the world have been strengthening enforcement activities in recent years. Sanofi and certain of its subsidiaries are under investigation or could become the subject of additional investigations by various government entities and are defending a number of lawsuits relating to antitrust and/or pricing and marketing practices including,(including, for example, in the United States, class action lawsuits and whistle blower litigation.whistleblower litigation). The Group also faces significant litigation and government investigations or audits, including allegations of securities law violations, corruption, claims related to employment matters, patent and intellectual property disputes, consumer law claims and tax audits. See "Item 8. Financial Information — A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information — Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings" and Note D.22. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report. Responding to such investigations is costly and distracts management's attention from our business.

        Unfavorable outcomes in any of these matters, or in similar matters to be faced in the future, could preclude the commercialization of products, harm our reputation, negatively affect the profitability of existing products and subject us to substantial fines (including treble damages), punitive damages, penalties and injunctive or administrative


Table of Contents

remedies, potentially leading to the imposition of additional regulatory controls or exclusion from government reimbursement programs or market and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial conditions.

        These risks may encourage the companyus to enter into settlement agreement with governmental authorities including with no admission of wrongdoing. Thoseagreements and those settlements may involve large cashsignificant monetary payments and/or criminal penalties and penalties.may include admissions of wrongdoing. Settlement of healthcare fraud cases in the United States may require companies to enter into a corporate integrity agreement,Corporate Integrity Agreement, which is intended to regulate company behavior for a specified period of years. For instance in December 2012, Sanofi U.S.We have entered into such agreements in the past and for example we expect to enter into such an agreement and be subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement for a period of five years as part of a settlement agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Massachusetts, the United States Department of Justicerelating to our Seprafilm® and multiple states to resolve all claims arising out of an


investigation into sampling of Sanofi's former viscosupplement product, Hyalgan®. As part of the settlement, Sanofi U.S. paid U.S.$109 Million to the settling parties and will enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of the Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. products.

Changes in the laws or regulations that apply to us could affect the Group's business, results of operations and financial condition.

        GovernmentalAll aspects of our business, including research and development, manufacturing, marketing, pricing or sales are subject to extensive legislation and regulation. Changes in applicable laws could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        For example, governmental authorities are increasingly looking to facilitate generic and biosimilar competition to existing products through new regulatory proposals intended to, or resulting in, changes to the scope of patent or data exclusivity rights and use of accelerated regulatory pathways for generic and biosimilar drug approvals. Such regulatory proposals if enacted, could make prosecution of patents for new products more difficult and time consuming or could adversely affect the exclusivity period for our products thereby(see "We rely on our patents and proprietary rights to provide exclusive rights to market certain of our products, and if such patents and other rights were limited or circumvented, our financial results could be materially and adversely affecting our financial results.affected" above).

        This new competitive environment and potential regulatory changes may further limit the exclusivity enjoyed by innovative products on the market and directly impact pricing and reimbursement levels, which may adversely affect our business and future results. See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.6. Markets — B.6.2. Competition" and "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview —"— B.6.3. Regulatory framework".

        In addition, changes in the various tax laws of the jurisdictions where affiliates of the Group operate, or changes in their application, with respect to matters such as tax rates, transfer pricing, dividends, controlled companies or a restriction in certain forms of tax relief, could affect our effective tax rate and our future results. For instance, both the OECD's initiative on Base Erosion and Profits Shifting (BEPS) and the European Union's initiative on the Code of Conduct for Business Taxation could lead to significant changes to tax laws and regulations in the future. Additionally, due to the complexity of the fiscal environment, the ultimate resolution of any tax matters may result in payments greater or lesser than amounts accrued.

        For information regarding risks related to changes in environmental rules and regulations, see "— Environmental liabilities and costs related to compliance costswith applicable regulations may have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations" below.

Risks Relating to Our Business

Our strategic objectives may not be fully realized.

        Our strategy is focused on four pillars in order to deliver sustainable long-term growth and maximize shareholder returns: grow a global healthcare leader with synergistic platforms, bring innovative products to market, seize value-enhancing growth opportunities, and adapt our structure for future opportunities and challenges. We may not be able to fully realize our strategic objectives and, even if we are able to do so, these strategic objectives may not deliver the expected benefits.

        For example, our strategy involves concentrating efforts around identified growth platforms and meeting significant growth objectives over 2012-2015. There is no guarantee that we will meet these objectives or that these platforms will grow in line with anticipated growth rates. A failure to continue to expand our business in targeted growth platforms could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

        As a further example, we are pursuing a Group-wide cost savings program which we expect, together with the expected synergies from our acquisition of Genzyme, to generate additional incremental cost savings by 2015. This also includes an adaptation plan regarding the activities of the Group in France. There is no assurance that the Group will successfully realize this plan. Moreover, the publicity given to this adaptation plan, may prejudice the Group's image and its reputation (see "— The expansion of social media platforms and mobile technologies present new risks and challenges." below). We may fail to realize all the expected cost savings resulting from these initiatives, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.

Our research and development efforts may not succeed in adequately renewing our product portfolio.

        Discovering and developing a new product is a costly, lengthy and uncertain process. To be successful in the highly competitive pharmaceutical industry, we must commit substantial resources each year to research and development in order to develop new products to takecompensate for the placedecreasing sales of our products facing expirationexpiry of patentpatents and regulatory data exclusivity or competition from new products of competitors that are perceived as being superior. In 2012,2014, we spent €4,922€4,824 million on research and development, amounting to approximately 14.1%14.3% of our net sales.


        WeOur industry is driven by the imperative need for constant innovation, but we may not be investing in the right technology platforms, therapeutic area,areas, and products classes in order to build a robust pipeline and fulfill unmet medical needs. Fields of discovery and especially biotechnology are highly competitive and characterized by significant and rapid technological changes. Numerous companies are working on the same targets and a product considered as promising at the very beginning may become less attractive if a competitor addressing the same unmet need reaches the market earlier.


        Developing a product is a costly, lengthy and uncertain process.Table of Contents

        The research and development process typically takes from 10 to 15 years from discovery to commercial product launch. This process is conducted in various stages in order to test, along with other features, the effectiveness and safety of a product. There can be no assurance that any of these compounds will be proven safe or effective. See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — PharmaceuticalB.5. Global Research & Development" and "Item 4. Information on the CompanyDevelopment — B. Business Overview — Vaccines Research and Development"B.5.2. Pharmaceuticals". Accordingly, there is a substantial risk at each stage of development — including clinical studies — that we will not achieve our goals of safety and/or effectiveness including during the course of a development trial and that we will have to abandon a product in which we have invested substantial amounts and human resources, includingeven in late stage development (Phase III). There can be no assurance that our research and development strategy will deliver the expected result in the targeted timeframe or at all, which could affect our profitability in the future.

        Decisions concerning the studies to be carried out can have a significant impact on the marketing strategy for a given product. Multiple in-depth studies can demonstrate that a product has additional benefits, facilitating the product's marketing, but such studies are expensive and time consuming and may delay the product's submission to health authorities for approval. Our ongoing investments in new product launches and research and development for future products could therefore result in increased costs without a proportionate increase in revenues, which maywould negatively affect our operating results.

        Obtaining regulatory marketing approval is not a guaranteeIn November 2014, we announced our intent to launch up to 18 new medicines and vaccines between 2014-2020, but there can be no assurance that our research and development strategy will deliver the product will achieve commercial success.expected result in the targeted timeframe or at all, which could affect our profitability in the future.

        Following each product marketing approval, the medical need served by the product and the corresponding reimbursement rate are evaluated by other governmental agencies, which mayrequiring in some cases require additional studies, including comparative studies, which may both effectively delay marketing of the new product and add to its development costs.

        After marketing approval of our products, other companies, investigators whether independently or with our authorization, may conduct studies or analysis beyond our control that may ultimately report results negatively affecting our sales either permanently or temporarily. It may take time for Sanofi to address the reported findings. For instance following a third party analysis of data alleging a link between insulin glargine and cancer, Sanofi initiated a large scale epidemiological program in 2009 to generate more information on whether there was any association between cancer and insulin use and to assess whether there was any difference in risk between insulin glargine and other insulins. Results of Sanofi's studies were available only three years later and concluded there was no increased risk of cancer in people with diabetes treated with Lantus®.

A substantial share of the revenue and income of the Group continues to depend on the performance of certain flagship products.

        We generate a substantial share of our revenues from the sale of certain key products (see "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Results of Operations — Year ended December 31, 2014 compared with year ended December 31, 2013 — Net Sales by Product — Pharmaceuticals segment"). Lantus® is particularly important; it was the Group's leading product with revenues of €6,344 million in 2014, representing 18.8% of the Group's consolidated revenues for the year. Lantus® is a flagship product of the Diabetes division, one of the Group's main divisions. However, in November 2014, we announced that we expect our global Diabetes sales to be flat to slightly growing at constant exchange rates between 2015 and 2018 (assuming no entry of a substitutable insulin glargine biosimilar on the U.S. market before 2019). Nevertheless our actual sales may differ from these expectations given the numerous underlying assumptions such as the dynamics of the basal insulin market in the U.S., the conversion of patients from Lantus® to Toujeo®, the continued growth of our diabetes products in Emerging Markets, or the U.S. launches of Afrezza®, Lyxumia® and LixiLan. Furthermore, the launch of new medicines and vaccines in other therapeutic areas and the sustained performance of our other growth platforms may not allow us to reduce the relative contribution of Lantus® to our overall performance.

        Our flagship products benefit from certain intellectual property protections such as patents and exclusivity periods but patent and proprietary rights, even if they are not challenged, are subject to expiration dates. Expiration of effective intellectual property protections for our products typically results in the entry of one or more generic competitors, often leading to a rapid and severe decline in revenues on those products. For example, Plavix® lost its market exclusivity in the United States in May 2012 and as a result, its U.S. sales dropped by 90% within the two months following the loss of market exclusivity (for information on the expected impact of biosimilar entry see "— We may lose market share to competing remedies, biosimilar or generic brands.")

        Furthermore, in general, if our flagship products were to encounter problems such as material product liability litigation, unexpected side effects, regulatory proceedings, publicity affecting doctor or patient confidence, pressure from existing competitive products, changes in labeling, or if a new, more effective treatment were introduced, or if


Table of Contents

there were a reduction in sales of one or more of our flagship products or in their growth, the adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition could be significant.

We may lose market share to competing remedies, biosimilar or generic brands.

        We are faced with intense competition from generic products, biosimilars and brand-name drugs including from retail chains and distributors. For example in 2015 in Japan, we expect generic competition on Plavix® starting from mid year.

        Doctors or patients may choose these products over ours if they perceive them to be safer, more reliable, more effective, easier to administer or less expensive, which could cause our revenues to decline and adversely affect our results of operations.

        The success of a product also depends on our ability to educate patients and healthcare providers and provide them with innovative data about the product and its uses. If these education efforts are not effective, then we may not be able to increase the sales of our new products to the market toor realize the full value of our investment in itstheir development.

        On the same topic, for the research and development of drugs in rare diseases, we produce relatively small amounts of material at early stages. Even if a product candidate receives all necessary approvals for commercialization, weWe may not be able to successfully scale-up productionanticipate precisely the date of market entry of generics or biosimilars or the product material at a reasonable cost or at all and we may not receive additional manufacturing approvals in sufficient time to meet product demand,potential impact on our sales both of which could lead to a significant loss of sales of that drug and could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We may lose market share to competing remedies or generic brands if they are perceived to be equivalent or superior products.

        We are faced with intense competition from generic products and brand-name drugs. Doctors or patients may choose these products over ours if they perceive them to be safer, more reliable, more effective, easier to administer or less expensive, which could cause our revenues to decline and affect our results of operations.

        In 2012, our patented pharmaceutical business faced important patent expirations and generic competition. For example Avapro®, Plavix®, and Eloxatin® lost their market exclusivity in the U.S in March, May and August 2012, and Aprovel® lost its market exclusivity in the E.U in August 2012.

depend on numerous parameters. The introduction of a generic version of a branded medicine typically results in a significant and rapid reduction in net sales for the branded product because generic manufacturers typically offer their unbranded


versions at sharplysignificantly lower prices.prices, resulting in both an adverse price and volume effects for our genericized products. For example, Plavix® lost its market exclusivity in the United States in May 2012 and as a result, its U.S. sales dropped by 90% within the two months following the loss of market exclusivity. Substitution is often permitted for generics that are considered to be interchangeable or clinically identical. With respect to biosimilars, in the United States only biosimilars that refer to an innovator drug that was approved under a Biologics License Application may be designated as interchangeable with the original biologic and only in circumstances where specific criteria are met. In Europe, in many countries, automatic substitution of biologics is officially prohibited or not recommended. Nevertheless competition from even non-substitutable biosimilars would likely result in a decrease in prices, additional rebates, promotion effort and lower margins.

        Approval and market entry of a generic product often reduces the priceor biosimilar that we receiveis substitutable for these products and/or the volume of the product that we would be able to sell and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The extent of sales erosion also depends on the number of generic versionsone of our products would increase the risk of accelerated market penetration by that are actually marketed.generic or biosimilar to a greater extent than would be the case for a non-substitutable product.

        Additionally, in many countries such as the United States or France,These trends are exacerbated by applicable legislation which encourages the use of generic products to reduce spending on prescription drugs.drugs in many countries such as the United States and France. Therefore, the market for our products could also be affected if a competitor's innovative drug in the same market were to become available as generic because a certain number of patients can be expected to switch to a lower-cost alternative therapy.

        Additional products of the Group could become subject to generic competition in the future as we We expect this generic competition to continue and to implicate drugmore of our products, evenincluding those with relatively modest revenues.sales.

AThe manufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, delay the launch of new products and negatively impact our image.

        Many of our products are manufactured using technically complex processes requiring specialized facilities, highly specific raw materials and other production constraints. Third parties supply us with a substantial shareportion of our raw materials, active ingredients and medical devices, which exposes us to the revenuerisk of a supply shortage or interruption in the event that these suppliers are unable to manufacture our products meeting Group quality standards or experience financial difficulties. Further, some raw materials essential to the manufacture of our products are not widely available from sources we consider reliable; for example, we have approved only a limited number of suppliers of heparins for use in the manufacture of Lovenox®. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.8. Production and incomeRaw Materials" for a description of these outsourcing arrangements.

        Our products are also increasingly reliant on the Group continues touse of product-specific devices for administration which may result in technical issues. For example, Praluent®, currently under development, will be administered with an auto-injector manufactured by a third party. The success of this product, once launched, will depend partially on the performance of certain flagship products.this device.


Table of Contents

        We generate a substantial sharemust also be able to produce sufficient quantities of the products to satisfy demand. We may have difficulties scaling-up production of our revenues fromproducts which are under development once they are approved. In 2014 we entered into an agreement with Boehringer Ingelheim for the salemanufacture of certain keytherapeutic monoclonal antibodies to reinforce our manufacturing capacity to support upcoming product launches, however, there is no certainty that this agreement will deliver the expected benefits in terms of manufacturing capabilities.

        Our biological products (see "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Resultsin particular, are subject to the risk of Operations — Year ended December 31, 2012 compared with year ended December 31, 2011 — Net Sales by Product — Pharmaceuticals segment"), which represented 42.2%manufacturing stoppages or the risk of loss of inventory because of the Group's consolidated revenuesdifficulties inherent in 2012. Among these products is Lantus®, which was the Group's leading product with revenuesprocessing of €4,960 million in 2012, representing 14.2%biological materials and the potential unavailability of the Group's consolidated revenues for the year. Lantus® is a flagship productadequate amounts of the Diabetes division, one of the Group's growth platforms.

        In general, if the products referred to above were to encounter problems such as loss of patent protection, material product liability litigation, unexpected side effects, regulatory proceedings, publicity affecting doctor or patient confidence, pressure from existing competitive products, changes in labeling, or if a new, more effective treatment were introduced, or if there were a reduction in sales of one or more ofraw materials meeting our flagship products or in their growth,standards (for the impact on our business,financial statements see "— Impairment charges or write downs in our books and changes in accounting standards could have a significant adverse effect on the Group's results of operations and financial condition could be significant.

We may fail to successfully identify external business opportunities or realize the anticipated benefits from our strategic investments.results.")

        As a complement to our portfolio of products, we pursue a strategy of selective acquisitions, in-licensing and partnerships in order to develop growth opportunities. The implementation of this strategy depends on our ability to identify business development opportunities and execute them at a reasonable cost and under acceptable conditions of financing. Moreover, entering into in-licensing or partnership agreements generally requires the payment of significant "milestones" well before the relevant products are placed on the market without any assurance that such investments will ultimately become profitableFor example, starting from 2012 Sanofi Pasteur encountered production issues which caused delays in the supply of Pentacel® vaccine in the U.S. While these problems have either been remediated or are in the process of being remediated, Sanofi Pasteur continues to face a strong demand for its vaccines that requires it in certain cases to manage the supply allocation. Sanofi Pasteur is working to increase its capacities but cannot reasonably estimate how long term (see Note D.21.1.it will take to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report).

        Because of the active competition among pharmaceutical groups for such business development activities, thereaddress these constraints. There can be no assuranceguarantee that we will not face similar issues in the future or that we will successfully manage such issues when they arise.

        Additionally, specific conditions must be respected both by the Group and our customers for the storage and distribution of many of our success in completingbiological products, for example, cold storage for certain vaccines and insulin-based products.

        The complexity of these transactions when such opportunities are identified.

        Onceprocesses, as well as strict internal and health authorities standards for the manufacture of our products, subject us to risks as the investigation and remediation of any identified or suspected problems can cause production delays, substantial expense, product recalls, lost sales and inventories, and delay the inability to quickly or efficiently integrate newly acquired activities or businesses; a longer integration than expected; the losslaunch of key employees; or higher than anticipated integration costs,new products, which could delayadversely affect our growth objectivesoperating results and prevent us from achieving expected synergies.

        Moreover, we may miscalculate the risks associated with newly acquired activities or businesses at the time they are acquired or not have the means to evaluate them properly, including with regards to the potential of research and development pipelines, manufacturing issues, compliance issues, or the outcome of ongoing legal and other proceedings. It may also take a considerable amount of time and be difficult to implement a risk analysis and risk mitigation plan after the acquisition is completed due to lack of historical data. As a result, risk managementfinancial condition, cause reputational damage and the coverage of such risks, particularly through insurance policies, may prove to be insufficient or ill-adapted.


The diversification of the Group's business exposes us to increased risks.

        While pursuing our objective to become a global and diversified leader within the health industry, we are exposed to a number of new risks inherent in sectors in which, in the past, we have been either less active or not present at all. As an example:

        Moreover, losses that may be sustained or caused by these new businesses may differ, with regards to their nature, scope and level, from the typesrisk of product liability claims that we have handled in the past (see "— Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition" above), and thus our current risk management and insurance coverage).

        When manufacturing disruptions occur, we may not be adaptedhave alternate manufacturing capacity, particularly for certain biological products. In the event of manufacturing disruptions, it is also difficult to such losses. These risks could affect our business, resultsuse back-up facilities or set up new facilities because biological products are more complex to manufacture. Even though we aim to have backup sources of operations or financial condition.

The globalization of the Group's business exposes us to increased risks.

        Emerging markets have been identified as onesupply whenever possible, including by manufacturing backup supplies of our growth platformsprincipal active ingredients at a second or third facility when practicable, we cannot be certain they will be sufficient if our principal sources become unavailable. Switching sources and are among the pillars of our overall strategy. Difficulties in adapting to emerging markets and/or amanufacturing facilities require significant decline in the anticipated growth rate in these regions could impair our ability to take advantage of these growth opportunities and could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.time.

        There is no guarantee that our effortsSupply shortages are subject to expand sales in emerging markets will continue to succeed. The significant expansion of our activities in emerging markets may further expose us to more volatile economic conditions, political instability, competition from companies that are already well established in these markets, the inability to adequately respond to the unique characteristics of these markets, particularlyeven greater criticism when they occur with respect to their regulatory frameworks, difficulties in recruiting qualified personnel, potential exchange controls, weaker intellectual property protection, higher crime levels (particularlylife saving medicines with respect to counterfeit products (see "— Counterfeit versions of our products harm our business," below)), and compliance issues including corruption and fraud, as we operate in many partslimited or no viable therapeutic alternatives. Independently of the world where these problems exist. Our existing policies and procedures, which are designed to help ensure that we, our employees, agents, intermediaries, and other third parties comply withlevel of revenues lost as a result of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the UK Bribery Act, and other anti-bribery laws, may not adequately protect us against liability under these laws for actions we or they may take with respect to our business.

        Failure to comply with domestic or international laws could result in various adverse consequences, including possible delay in the approval or refusal to approveshortage of a particular product, recalls, seizures, withdrawal of an approved product from the market, or the imposition of criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial monetary penalties.


Our products and manufacturing facilities are subject to significant government regulations and approvals, which are often costly and could result in adverse consequences to our business if we fail to comply with the regulations or maintain the approvals.

        The industry in which we operate facessuch shortages can have a changing regulatory environment and heightened public scrutiny worldwide, which simultaneously require greater assurances than ever as to the safety and efficacy of medications and health productsnegative impact on the one hand,patients, customers and effectively provide reduced incentives for innovative pharmaceutical research onprofessional healthcare providers' confidence and the other hand.

        Each regulatory authority may also impose its own requirements either at the timeimage of the filing of the dossier or later during its review in order to grant a license to market the product, including requiring local clinical studies, and may delay or refuse to grant approval, even though a product has already been approved in another country. For example in August 2012, Genzyme received a Refuse to File letter from the FDA in response to the supplemental Biologics License Application to the FDA seeking approval of Lemtrada™. The FDA did not request additional data or further studies but requested a modified presentation of the data sets to enable agency to better navigate the application. Finally, Genzyme resubmitted at the end of November 2012 the Lemtrada™ file and the FDA accepted on January 28, 2013 the application for review. In December 2012, the CHMP of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has adopted a negative opinion for the marketing authorization application for Kynamro™, but this product was approved by the FDA in January 2013.

        Health authorities are increasingly focusing on product safety and on the risk/benefit profile of pharmaceuticals products. In particular, the FDA and the EMA have imposed increasingly burdensome requirements on pharmaceutical companies, particularly in terms of the volume of data needed to demonstrate a product's efficacy and safety. For the same reasons, the marketed products are subject to continual review, risk evaluations or comparative effectiveness studies even after regulatory approval. These requirements have resulted in increasing the costs associated with maintaining regulatory approvals and achieving reimbursement for our products.

        Later discovery of previously undetected problems may result in marketing restrictions or the suspension or withdrawal of the product, as well as an increased risk of litigation for both pharmaceutical and animal health products. These post-regulatory approval reviews and data analyses can lead to the issuance of recommendations by government agencies, health professional and patient organizations or other specialized organizations regarding the use of products, which may result in a reduction in sales volume, such as, for example, a recommendation to limit the patient scope of a drug's indication. For instance in September 2011, the EMA defined a more restrictive indication for Multaq®, one of our cardiovascular products. Such reviews may result in the discovery of significant problems with respect to a competing product that is similar to one sold by the Group, which may in turn cast suspicion on the entire class to which these products belong and ultimately diminish the sales of the relevant product of the Group. When such issues arise, the contemplative nature of evidence-based health care and restrictions on what pharmaceutical manufacturers may say about their products are not always well suited to rapidly defending the Group or the public's legitimate interests in the face of the political and market pressures generated by social media and rapid news cycles, and this may result in commercial harm, overly restrictive regulatory actions and erratic share price performance.

Government authorities and regulators in the U.S.United States and in E.U.the European Union are also considering measures to reduce the risk of supply shortages of live-saving medicine in particular if there are no viable therapeutic alternatives.these risks. It cannot be ruled out that these ongoing initiatives may generate additional costs for the Group if they result in a requirement to set-upestablish back up supply channels or to increase the level of the inventoriesinventory levels to avoid shortages.

        In addition,Furthermore, we are sometimes required to use animals to test our products in the extent that new regulations raisedevelopment phase and our vaccines before distributing them. Testing on animals is vital for the costs of obtaining and maintaining product authorization, or limit the economic valuedevelopment of a new product and many times, it is the only way to its inventor,study the growth prospectseffects of our industrya product under development in a living body before tests are made on humans. Studies performed on animals also provide significant information on the causes and progress of diseases. Some countries require additional tests to be made on animals, even if the Group are diminished. Also about 50% of our current research and development portfolioproduct is constituted by biological products, that may bring in the future new therapeutic responses to current unmet medical needs but which may also lead to more technical constraints and costly investments from an industrial standpoint.

        Moreover, we and certain of our third-party suppliers are also required to comply withalready approved. If applicable regulations known as good manufacturing practices, which governwere to ban this practice, or if, due to pressure from animal welfare groups, we were no longer able to source animals to perform such tests, it would be difficult and in some cases impossible to develop or distribute our products in certain jurisdictions under the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. To monitor ourapplicable marketing authorizations.


compliance with those applicable regulations, the FDA, the EMA and comparable agencies in other jurisdictions routinely conduct inspectionsTable of our facilities and may identify potential deficiencies which might be expensive and time consuming to address. For example, in July 2012, Sanofi Pasteur received a Warning Letter from the FDA following regular inspections conducted at manufacturing facilities in Canada and France. If we fail to adequately respond to a warning letter identifying a deficiency, or otherwise fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we could be subject to enforcement, remedial and/or punitive actions by the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities. In 2010, Genzyme entered into a consent decree with the FDA relating to its Allston facility and paid U.S.$175.0 million to the U.S. Federal Government as disgorgement of past profits. The consent decree required Genzyme to implement a plan to bring the Allston facility into compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Genzyme submitted a comprehensive remediation plan to FDA in April 2011 and the plan was accepted by FDA. Remediation of the Allston facility in accordance with that plan is underway and is currently expected to continue for three more years.Contents

Our indebtedness may limit our business flexibility compared to some of our peers.

        Our consolidated debt increased substantially in connection with our acquisition of Genzyme in 2011. Although we continued to reduce our debt in 2012 (as of December 31, 2012, our debt, net of cash and cash equivalents amounted to €7.7 billion), we still make significant debt service payments to our lenders and this could limit our ability to engage in new transactions which could have been part of our strategy.

We face increasingThe pricing and reimbursement pressure onof our pharmaceutical products that could negatively affect our revenues and/or margins.is increasingly affected by government and other third parties decisions and cost reduction initiatives.

        The commercial success of our existing products and our productsproduct candidates depends in part on the conditions under which our products are reimbursed. Our products continue to be subject to increasing price and reimbursement pressure due to, amongst others:

In addition to the pricing pressures they exert, governmental and private third-party payers and purchasers of pharmaceutical products may reduce volumes of sales by restricting access to formularies or otherwise discouraging physician prescriptions of our products. Inproducts; policies requiring the automatic substitution of generics or biosimilars could also be put in place. For example, in the United States, the new federal health care reform law is increasing the government's role with respect to price, reimbursement and the coverage levels for healthcare services and products within the large government health carehealthcare sector. This law also imposed cost containment measures and rebates and fees on pharmaceutical companies. Implementation of health care reform has affected and could stillwill continue to affect our revenues and/or margins (for further details concerning this law and a descriptionmargins. For instance, in 2014, we had to increase the level of certain regulatory pricing systems that affect our Group see "Item 4. Information onrebates for Lantus® required to maintain favorable formulary positions with key payers in the Company — B. Business Overview — Pricing & Reimbursement").U.S. Some U.S. states are also considering legislation that would influence the marketing ofand prices of and access to drugs and U.S. federal and state officials will likely continue to focus on healthcare reform implementation in the future.

        We encounter similar cost containment issues in countries outside the United States. In certain countries, including countries in the EUEuropean Union, China and Canada, the coverage of prescription drugs, pricing and levels of reimbursement are subject to governmental control.

        Governmental and private third-party payers and purchasers of pharmaceutical products may also claim damages related to a preliminary injunction alleging they have over-reimbursed a drug if we do not ultimately prevail in the patent litigation. For instance earlyexample in Australia our patent on clopidogrel was ultimately held invalidated. Since 2013, in China the National DevelopmentAustralian Government has been seeking damages for its alleged over-reimbursement of clopidogrel drugs due to the preliminary injunction we had obtained against GenRX (a subsidiary of Apotex) during the course of the litigation.

        Furthermore there is a growing number of mergers of retail chains and Reform Commission set new national retail ceiling prices for 700 formulationsdistributors, this consolidation of 400 drugs; among them was Lantus® whosedistribution channels increases their capacity to negotiate price was cut by 12.9% (effective February 1, 2013).and other terms.

        Due to the ongoingthese cost containment policies being pursued in many jurisdictions in which we operate, weand pressure on our prices, our revenues and margins are, and could continue to be, negatively affected.

        We are also unable to predict the availability or amount of reimbursement for our product candidates.


The negotiation on the price in a country may also be incompatible with the global positioning of our product, which may lead us to not launch the product in that country.

        In addition,Finally, our operating results may also be affected by parallel imports, particularly within the European Union, whereby distributors engage in arbitrage based on national price differences to buy productproducts on low cost markets for resale on higher cost markets.

We rely on third parties for the discovery, manufacture and marketing of some of our products.

        Our industry is highly collaborative, whether in the discovery and development of new products, in-licensing, the marketing and distribution of approved products, or manufacturing activities. We expect that the reliance on third parties for key aspects of our business will continue to characterize our activities.

        We conduct a number of significant research and development programs and market some of our products in collaboration with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. For example, we currently have a global strategic collaboration with Regeneron for the discovery, development, commercialization and manufacturing of therapies based on monoclonal antibodies. We also have collaborative arrangements with Merck & Co., Inc. for the


Table of Contents

distribution of vaccines in Europe (See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.2. Main pharmaceutical products" and "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.3. Vaccine Products" for information on our alliances). We may also rely on partners to design and manufacture medical devices, notably for the administration of our products.

        If disruptions or quality concerns were to arise in the third-party supply of raw materials, active ingredients or medical devices or if our partner were unable to manufacture a product, this could also adversely affect our ability to sell our products in the quantities demanded by the market and could damage our reputation and relationships with our customers. See also "— The ongoing slowdownmanufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, delay the launch of new products and negatively impact our image".

        When we research and market our products through collaboration arrangements, we are subject to the risk that certain decisions, such as the establishment of budgets, development and promotion strategies and specific tasks, are under the control of our collaboration partners, and that, failures in the development or differing priorities may adversely affect the activities conducted through the collaboration arrangements. Any conflicts that we may have with our partners during the course of these agreements or at the time of their renewal or renegotiation may affect the marketing of certain of our products and may cause a decline in our revenues and affect our results of operations.

We are subject to the risk of non-payment by our customers (1).

        We run the risk of delayed payments or even non-payment by our customers, which consist principally of wholesalers, distributors, pharmacies, hospitals, clinics and government agencies. This risk is accentuated by the current worldwide financial slowdown. The United States poses particular client credit risk issues, because of the concentrated distribution system in which approximately 65% of our consolidated U.S. pharmaceutical sales are accounted for by just three wholesalers. We are also exposed to large wholesalers in other markets, particularly in Europe. Worldwide, the Group's three main customers represent 23.0% of our gross total revenues. An inability of one or more of these wholesalers to honor their debts to us could adversely affect our financial condition (see Note D.34. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report).

        In some countries, some customers are public or subsidized health systems. The economic and credit conditions in these countries may lead to longer payment terms. Because of this context, we may need to reassess the recoverable amount of our debts in these countries during the coming financial years (see also "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Liquidity.").

The global economic growthconditions and the unfavorable financial crisisenvironment could have negative consequences for our business1(2).

        Over the past several years, growth of the global pharmaceutical market has become increasingly tied to global economic growth. In this context, a substantial and lasting slowdown of the global economy, or major national economies or emerging markets could negatively affect growth in the global pharmaceutical market and, as a result, adversely affect our business. Such a slowdown hasUnfavorable economic conditions have reduced the sources of funding for national social security systems, leading to heightened pressure on drug prices, increased substitution of generic drugs, and the exclusion of certain products from formularies.

        Further, we believe our net sales may be negatively impacted by the continuing challenging global economic environment, as high unemployment, levels and increases in co-pays, and lack of developed third party payer system in certain regions, may lead some patients to switch to generic products, delay treatments, skip doses or use less effective treatments to reduce their costs. Moreover, current economic conditions in the United States have resulted in an increase in the number of patients in the Medicaid program, under which sales of pharmaceuticals are subject to substantial rebates and, in many U.S. states, to formulary restrictions limiting access to brand-name drugs, including ours.

        The growth of our OTC and CHC business may also be negatively affected by the current slowdown in global economic growth Also, as consumer spending is closely tied to the global economy. Also our animal health business could be impacted. For example, tight credit conditions may limit the borrowing power of livestock producers, causing some to switch to lower-priced products.

        Although macroeconomic and financial measures have been taken in 2012 by governments and monetary authorities, notably in Europe reducing thus the risk of failure of a State, the slowing economic environment, the default or failure of major players including wholesalers or public sector buyers financed by insolvent States may affect the financial situationresult of the Group but can also cause the Group to experience disruptionsinsurance coverage mandate that goes into effect in the distribution of its products as well as the adverse effects described below at "We are subject to the risk of non-payment by our customers". Moreover, to the extent that the economicU.S. in 2015 and financial crisis is directly affecting business, it may also lead to a disruption or delay in the performance of third parties on which we rely for parts of our business, including collaboration partners and suppliers (for more information see "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Liquidity."). Such disruptions or delays could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See "— We rely on third parties for the discovery, manufacture and marketing of2016, some of our products" below.

The manufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition and delay the launch of new products.

        Many of our products are manufactured using technically complex processes requiring specialized facilities, highly specific raw materials and other production constraints. We must also be able to produce sufficient quantities of the products to satisfy demand. Our biologic products (including vaccines) in particular are subject to the risk of manufacturing stoppages or the risk of loss of inventory because of the difficulties inherent to the processing of biological materials and the potential unavailability of adequate amounts of raw materials meeting our standards. We may not have redundant manufacturing capacity for certain products particularly biologic products. For instance all of our bulk Cerezyme® products are produced solely at our Allston, Massachusetts facility. Even though we aim to have backup sources of supply whenever possible, including by manufacturing backup supplies of our principal active ingredients at a second or third facility when practicable, we cannot be certain they will be sufficient if our principal sources become unavailable. Switching sources and manufacturing facilities may require significant time.

   


(1)
Information in this section is complementaryin addition to Note B.8.8. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report, with respect to information required by IFRS 7, and is covered by our independent registered public accounting firms' report on the consolidated financial statements and by Notes D.10. and D.34. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.

(2)
Information in this section is in addition to Note B.8.8. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report, with respect to information required by IFRS 7, and is covered by our independent registered public accounting firms' report on the consolidated financial statements.

        Additionally, specificTable of Contents

employers may seek to reduce costs by reducing or eliminating employer group healthcare plans or transferring a greater portion of healthcare costs to their employees.

        Our CHC and animal health business could also be adversely impacted as difficult economic conditions must be respected bothmay limit the financial resources of people and livestock producers.

        If economic conditions worsen or in case of default or failure of major players including wholesalers or public sector buyers financed by insolvent States, the financial situation of the Group, and our customers for the storage and distribution of many of our products,e.g., cold storage for certain vaccines and insulin-based products. The complexity of these processes, as well as strict internal and government standards for the manufacture of our products, subject us to risks. The occurrence or suspected occurrence of out-of-specification production or storage can lead to lost inventories, and in some cases product recalls, with consequential reputational damage and the risk of product liability (see "— Product liability claims could adversely affect our business,its results of operations and financial condition," above). Groupthe distribution channels of its products are increasingly reliant on the use of product-specific devices for administration; a technical problem in these devices could jeopardize the approval or the commercialization of the products or require a recall.

        Supply shortagesmay be affected. See also "We are subject to public scrutinythe risk of non-payment by our customers".

        Moreover, economic and are subject to even greater public criticism when they occur with respect to life saving medicines with limited therapeutic alternatives. Such shortages canfinancial difficulties may have a negativean adverse impact on the image of the Group independent of the level of revenues lost as a result of the shortage of a particular product. The investigationthird parties who are important to our business, including collaboration partners and remediation of any identified manufacturing problems can cause production delays, substantial expense, lost sales and delay the launch of new products,suppliers, which could adversely affectcause such third parties to delay or disrupt performance of their obligations to us, resulting in a material and adverse effect on our operatingbusiness or results and financial condition.

        Like many of our competitors, we have faced and may face in the future manufacturing issues. For example, Genzyme experienced in the past significant difficulties in manufacturing Cerezyme® and Fabrazyme® for several years. In summer 2011 a technical incident occurred in the filling line used for Apidra 3mL cartridges at our manufacturing site in Frankfurt which caused temporary shortages for Apidra 3mL cartridges. In April 2012 Sanofi Pasteur temporarily imposed supply limitations for Pentacel® and Daptacel® vaccines in the U.S. due to a manufacturing delay that temporarily reduced the effective capacity to below the level needed to fully satisfy market demand in the U.S. In June 2012 Sanofi Pasteur voluntarily recalled the Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine produced in its Canadian facility due to manufacturing issues. This withdrawal is expected to last several months while the renovation of the building is completed. There can be no guarantee that we will not face similar issues in the future or that we will successfully manage such issues when they arise.

operations. See "— We rely on third parties for the discovery, manufacture and marketing of some of our products.

        Our industry is highly collaborative, whether in the discovery and development of new products, in-licensing, the marketing and distribution of approved products, or manufacturing activities. We expect that the reliance on third parties for key aspects of our business will continue to characterize our activities.

        Third parties supply us with a substantial portion of our raw materials, active ingredients and medical devices, which exposes us to the risk of a supply interruption in the event that these suppliers experience financial difficulties or are unable to manufacture a sufficient supply of our products meeting Group quality standards. It also increases the risk of quality issues, even with the most scrupulously selected suppliers.

        Further, some raw materials essential to the manufacture of our products are not widely available from sources we consider reliable; for example, we have approved only a limited number of suppliers of heparins for use in the manufacture of Lovenox®. Heparin purchase prices can also fluctuate. See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Production and Raw Materials" for a description of these outsourcing arrangements. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.

        If disruptions or quality concerns were to arise in the third-party supply of raw materials, active ingredients or medical devices, this could adversely affect our ability to sell our products in the quantities demanded by the market and could damage our reputation and relationships with our customers. See also "— The manufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition and delay the launch of new products" above.

        We also conduct a number of significant research and development programs and market some of our products in collaboration with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. For example, we currently have collaborative arrangements with Regeneron for the discovery, development and commercialization of therapies based on monoclonal antibodies, Warner Chilcott for the osteoporosis treatment Actonel®, and with


Merck & Co., Inc. for the distribution of vaccines in Europe (See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Pharmaceutical Products — Main pharmaceutical products" and "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Vaccine Products" for more information on our alliances). We may also rely on partners to designsee "Item 5. Operating and manufacture medical devices, notably for the administration of our products. When we researchFinancial Review and market our products through collaboration arrangements, we are subject to the risk that certain decisions, such as the establishment of budgets, developmentProspects — Liquidity and promotion strategies and specific tasks, are under the control of our collaboration partners, and that deadlocks, failures in the development or differing priorities may adversely affect the activities conducted through the collaboration arrangements. Any conflicts that we may have with our partners during the course of these agreements or at the time of their renewal or renegotiation may affect the marketing of certain of our products and may cause a decline in our revenues and affect our results of operations.Capital Resources — Liquidity."

Counterfeit versions of our products harm our business.

        The drug supply has been increasingly challenged by the vulnerability of distribution channels to illegal counterfeitingCounterfeiting activities and the presence of counterfeit products in a growing number of markets and over the Internet.Internet continue to be a challenge for maintaining a safe drug supply. Counterfeit products are frequently unsafe or ineffective, and can be potentially life-threatening. To distributors and users, counterfeit products may be visually indistinguishable from the authentic version. Reports of adverse reactions to counterfeit drugs oralong with increased levels of counterfeiting could materiallybe mistakenly attributed to the authentic product, affect patient confidence in the authentic product and harm the business of companies such as Sanofi. Additionally, it is possible that adverse events caused by unsafe counterfeit products will mistakenly be attributed to the authentic product. If a Group product waswere to be the subject of counterfeits, the Group could incur substantial reputational and financial harm. See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.6. Markets — B.6.2. Competition."

We are subject toImpairment charges or write downs in our books and changes in accounting standards could have a significant adverse effect on the riskGroup's results of non-payment by our customers1.operations and financial results.

        We run the risk of delayed payments or even non-payment by our customers, which consist principally of wholesalers, distributors, pharmacies, hospitals, clinicsSubstantial value is allocated to intangible assets and government agencies. This risk is accentuated by the current worldwide financial crisis. The United States poses particular client credit risk issues, because of the concentrated distribution system in which approximately 58% of our consolidated U.S. pharmaceutical sales are accounted for by just three wholesalers. In addition, the Group's three main customers represent 17.0% of our gross total revenues. We are also exposed to large wholesalers in other markets, particularly in Europe. An inability of one or more of these wholesalers to honor their debts to us could adversely affect our financial condition (seegoodwill resulting from business combinations, as disclosed at Note D.34.D.4. to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report at Item 18, which could be substantially impaired upon indications of this annual report)impairment (primarily relating to pharmacovigilance, discontinued research and development project, patent litigation and the launch of competing products), with adverse effects on our financial condition and the value of our assets.

        Furthermore, if any of our strategic equity investments decline in value and remain below cost for an extended duration, we may be required to write down our investment. We also own a significant stake in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (22.3% of share capital as of December 31, 2014), which is listed on the NASDAQ and has been accounted for using the equity method since 2014. Any material deterioration in Regeneron's share price or financial performance would be an indicator that the value of our investment might have become impaired. This would require us to perform an impairment test, which could have a negative impact on our financial statements.

        The inherent variability of biologics manufacturing increases the risk of write-offs of these products. Due to the value of the materials used, the carrying amount of biological products is much higher than that of small-molecule products.

        The financial environment and in particular the economic difficulties affecting certain European countries, Russia and Venezuela could also negatively affect the value of our assets (see "— The global economic conditions and the unfavorable financial environment could have negative consequences for our business" and "— Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition").

        Since 2010, some countriesAny new or revised accounting standards, rules and interpretations issued from time to time by the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) could also result in changes to the recognition of southern Europe have faced importantincome and expense that may materially and adversely affect the Group's financial difficulties. Some customers in these countries are public or subsidized health systems. The deteriorating economic and credit conditions in these countries may lead to longer payment terms. Becauseresults.


Table of this trend we may need to reassess the recoverable amount of our debts in these countries during the coming financial years (for more information see "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Liquidity.").Contents

Our pension liabilities are affected by factors such as the performance of plan assets, interest rates, actuarial data and experience and changes in laws and regulations.

        Our future funding obligations for our main defined-benefit pension plans depend on changes in the future performance of assets held in trust for these plans, the interest rates used to determine funding levels (or company liabilities), actuarial data and experience, inflation trends, the level of benefits provided for by the plans, as well as changes in laws and regulations. Adverse changes in those factors could increase our unfunded obligations under such plans, which would require more funds to be contributed and hence negatively affect our cash flow and results (see Note D.19.1 to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report).


(1)
Information in this section is complementary to Note B.8.8. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report, with respect to information required by IFRS 7, and is covered by our independent registered public accounting firms' report on the consolidated financial statements and by Notes D.10. and D.34. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.

Impairment charges or write downs in our books and changes in accounting standards could have a significant adverse effect on the Group's results of operations and financial results.

        New or revised accounting standards, rules and interpretations issued from time to time by the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) could result in changes to the recognition of income and expense that may materially and adversely affect the Group's financial results.

        In addition, substantial value is allocated to intangible assets and goodwill resulting from business combinations, as disclosed at Note D.4. to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report at Item 18, which could be substantially impaired upon indications of impairment (primarily relating to pharmacovigilance, patent litigation and the launch of competing products), with adverse effects on our financial condition and the value of our assets.

        Also if any of our strategic equity investments decline in value and remain below cost for an extended duration, we may be required to write down our investment.

        In addition the global financial crisis and in particular the ongoing sovereign debt crisis affecting certain European countries could also negatively affect the value of our assets (see "— The ongoing slowdown of global economic growth and the financial crisis could have negative consequences for our business" above and "— Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition" below).

We are increasingly dependent on information technologies and networks.

        Our business increasingly depends on the use of information technologies, which means that certain key areas such as research and development, production and sales are to a large extent dependent on our information technology capabilities. We are commercializingsystems or those of third party providers, notably for storing and transferring confidential or sensitive information. Moreover, we commercialize a number of devices using new technologies which, in case of malfunctions could lead to a risk of harm to patients (see "— Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition" above)) or the unavailability of our products. While we and our third-party service providers have invested heavily insecure information technology systems for the protection of data, and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts or those of our third-party service providers (for instance the accounting of some of our subsidiaries has been externalized) to implement adequate security and qualitycontrol measures for data processing would be sufficient to protect against service disruption, data deterioration or loss in the event of a system malfunction, or prevent data from being stolen or corrupted in the event of a security breach, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The expansion of social media platforms and mobile technologies presents new risks and challenges.

        New technologies are increasingly used to communicate about our products and diseases or the diseases they are intended to treat.provide health services. The use of these media requires specific attention, monitoring programs and moderation of comments. For instance, patients may use these channels to comment on the effectiveness of a product and to report an alleged adverse event. When such issues arise, the nature of evidence-based health care and restrictions on what pharmaceutical manufacturers may say about their products are not always well suited to rapidly defending the Group or the public's legitimate interests in the face of the political and market pressures generated by social media and rapid news cycles, and this may result in commercial harm, overly restrictive regulatory actions and erratic share price performance. Negative posts or comments about the Company, itsSanofi, our business, its directors or officers on any social networking web site could seriously damage our reputation. In addition, our associatesemployees and partners may use the social media tools and mobile technologies inappropriately which may give rise to liability for the Company, or which could lead to the exposure of sensitive information. In either case, such uses of social media and mobile technologies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Natural disasters prevalentRisks Relating to the Group Structure and Strategy

We may fail to successfully identify external business opportunities or realize the anticipated benefits from our strategic investments.

        As a complement to our portfolio of products, we pursue a strategy of selective acquisitions, in-licensing and collaborations in certainorder to develop growth opportunities. The implementation of this strategy depends on our ability to identify business development opportunities and execute them at a reasonable cost and under acceptable conditions of financing. Moreover, entering into in-licensing or partnership agreements generally requires the payment of significant "milestones" well before the relevant products are placed on the market, without any assurance that such investments will ultimately become profitable in the long term (see Note D.21.1. to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report and also "— We rely on third parties for the discovery, manufacture and marketing of some of our products").

        Our growth objectives could be delayed or ultimately not realized, and expected synergies could be adversely impacted if:


Table of Contents

        Because of the active competition among pharmaceutical groups for such business development activities, there can be no assurance of our success in completing these transactions when such opportunities are identified.

        Moreover, we may miscalculate the risks associated with newly acquired activities or businesses at the time they are acquired or not have the means or access to all the relevant information to evaluate them properly, including with regards to the potential of research and development pipelines, manufacturing issues, compliance issues, or the outcome of ongoing legal and other proceedings. It may also take a considerable amount of time and be difficult to implement a risk analysis and risk mitigation plan after the acquisition is completed due to lack of historical data. As a result, risk management and the coverage of such risks, particularly through insurance policies, may prove to be insufficient or ill-adapted.

The globalization of the Group's business exposes us to increased risks in specific areas.

        Emerging Markets are among the pillars of our overall strategy. Difficulties in adapting to Emerging Markets, a significant decline in the anticipated growth rate in these regions in which we do businessor an unfavorable movement of the exchange rates of these countries' currencies against the euro could impair our ability to take advantage of these growth opportunities and could affect our operations.business, results of operations or financial condition.

        The significant expansion of our activities in Emerging Markets further exposes us to more volatile economic conditions, political instability, competition from multinational or locally based companies that are already well established in these markets, the inability to adequately respond to the unique characteristics of Emerging Markets, particularly with respect to their regulatory frameworks, difficulties in recruiting qualified personnel or maintaining required internal control systems, potential exchange controls, weaker intellectual property protection, higher crime levels (particularly with respect to counterfeit products (see "— Counterfeit versions of our products harm our business")), and compliance issues including corruption and fraud (see "— Claims and investigations relating to compliance, competition law, marketing practices, pricing as well as other legal matters, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition").

        Also as a global healthcare leader, we are exposed to a number of risks inherent in sectors in which, in the past, we have been less active such as the generic and consumer healthcare sectors whose business models and trade channels are different from the traditional pharmaceutical activity in particular regarding promotional efforts and trade terms.

Our strategic objectives may not be fully realized.

        SomeOur strategy is focused on four key priorities in order to deliver sustainable long-term growth and maximize shareholder returns: grow a global healthcare leader with synergistic businesses, bring innovative products to market, seize value-enhancing growth opportunities, and adapt our structure for future opportunities and challenges.

        We may not be able to fully realize our strategic objectives and, even if we are able to do so, these strategic objectives may not deliver the expected benefits.

        The Group concentrates its efforts around identified businesses to meet significant growth objectives. There is no guarantee that we will meet these objectives or that these businesses, such as Emerging Markets or innovative products, will grow in line with anticipated growth rates. A failure to continue to expand our business in these areas could affect our results of operations or financial condition.

        The successful launch of a new pharmaceutical product involves substantial investment in sales and marketing activities. In November 2014, we announced our intent to launch up to 18 new medicines and vaccines between 2014-2020; however there can be no assurance that these product candidates will be approved, with the requested indications, or if at all, and if approved, will achieve commercial success. The success of a product also depends on our ability to successfully produce and launch it. The strategy of launch that we may develop (notably in terms of timing, pricing, market access, marketing efforts and dedicated sales forces) may not deliver the benefits that we expect. The relevant competitive environment may also have evolved at the time of the actual launch, modifying our initial expectations. The need to prioritize the allocation of financial resources and sales forces may cause delays in the expected launch of some of our production sites are locatedproducts.


Table of Contents

Our success depends in areas exposedpart on our senior management team and other key employees and our ability to natural disasters,attract, integrate and retain key personnel and qualified individuals in the face of intense competition.

        We depend on the expertise of our senior management team and other key employees. In addition, we rely heavily on recruiting and retaining talented people to help us meet our strategic objectives. We face intense competition for qualified individuals for senior management positions, or in specific geographic regions or in specialized fields such as earthquakes (in North Africa, Middle East, Asia, Pacific, Europe, Centralclinical development, biosciences and Latin Americas), floods (in Africa, Asia Pacificdevices. In addition, our ability to hire qualified personnel also depends in part on our ability to reward performance, incentivize our employees and Europe)to pay competitive compensation. Laws and hurricanes. Inregulations on executive compensation may restrict our ability to attract, motivate and retain the eventrequired level of a major disaster we could experience severe destruction talented people. The inability to attract, integrate and/or interruptionretain highly skilled personnel, in particular those in leadership positions, may weaken our succession plans, may materially adversely affect the implementation of our operationsstrategy and production capacity. As a result, our operationsability to meet our strategic objectives and could suffer serious harm which could have a material adverse effect onultimately impact our business financial condition andor results of operations.


Environmental Risks of Our Industrial Activities

Risks from the handling of hazardous materials could adversely affect our results of operations.

        Manufacturing activities, such as the chemical manufacturing of the active ingredients in our products and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and wastes, expose us to various risks, including:

        These operating risks can cause personal injury, property damage and environmental contamination, and may result in:

penalties and civil damages.

        The occurrence of any of these events may significantly reduce the productivity and profitability of a particular manufacturing facility and adversely affect our operating results.results and reputation.

        Although we maintain property, business interruption and casualty insurance that we believe is in accordance with customary industry practices, we cannot assure you that this insurance willmay not be adequate to fully cover fully all potential hazards incidental to our business.

Environmental liabilities and costs related to compliance costswith applicable regulations may have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations.

        The environmental laws of various jurisdictions impose actual and potential obligations on our Group to remediate contaminated sites. These obligations may relate to sites:

        These environmental remediation obligations could significantly reduce our operating results. Sanofi accrues provisions for remediation when our management believes the need is probable and that it is reasonably possible to estimate the cost. See "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.10. Health, Safety and Environment (HSE)" for additional information regarding our environmental policies. In particular, our provisions for these obligations may be insufficient if the assumptions underlying these provisions prove incorrect or if we are held responsible for additional, currently undiscovered contamination. These judgments and estimates may later prove inaccurate, and any shortfalls could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

        Furthermore, we are or may become involved in claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings relating to environmental matters. Some current and former Sanofi's subsidiaries have been named as "potentially responsible parties" or the equivalent under the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (also known as "Superfund"), and similar statutes in France, Germany, Italy, Brazil and elsewhere. As a matter of statutory or contractual obligation, we and/or our subsidiaries may retain responsibility for environmental liabilities at some of the sites of our predecessor companies, or our subsidiaries that we demerged,


Table of Contents

divested or may divest. We have disputes outstanding regarding certain sites no longer owned by the Group. An adverse outcome in such disputes might have a significant adverse effect on our operating results. See Note D.22.e) to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report and "Item 8. Financial Information — A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information — Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings".


        Environmental regulations are evolving (i.e., in Europe, REACH, CLP/GHS, SEVESO, IPPC/IED, the Waste Framework Directive, the Emission Trading Scheme Directive, the Water Framework Directive and the Directive on Taxation of Energy Products and Electricity and several other regulations aiming at preventing global warming). Stricter environmental, safety and health laws and enforcement policies could result in substantial costs and liabilities to our Group and could subject our handling, manufacture, use, reuse or disposal of substances or pollutants, site restoration and compliance costs to more rigorous scrutiny than is currently the case. Consequently, compliance with these laws could result in significant capital expenditures as well as other costs and liabilities, thereby adversely affecting our business, results of operations or financial condition. For more detailed information on environmental issues, see "Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — B.10. Health, Safety and Environment (HSE)."

Natural disasters prevalent in certain regions in which we do business could affect our operations.

        Some of our production sites are located in areas exposed to natural disasters, such as earthquakes (in North Africa, Middle East, Asia, Pacific, Europe, Central and Latin Americas), floods (in Africa, Asia Pacific and Europe) and hurricanes. In the event of a major disaster we could experience severe destruction or interruption of our operations and production capacity. As a result, our operations and our employees could suffer serious harm which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Financial Markets1(3)

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

        Because we sell our products in numerous countries, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. We are particularly sensitive to movements in exchange rates between the euro and the U.S. dollar, the British pound, the Japanese yen, and to currencies in emerging countries.Emerging Markets. In 2012, 31%2014, 34% of our net sales were realized in the United States.States, 34% in Emerging Markets (including countries that are or may in future be subject to exchange controls) and 6% in Japan. While we incur expenses in those currencies, the impact of currency exchange rates on these expenses does not fully offset the impact of currency exchange rates on our revenues. As a result, currency exchange rate movements can have a considerable impact on our earnings. When deemed appropriate and when technically feasible, we enter into transactions to hedge our exposure to foreign exchange risks. These efforts, when undertaken, may fail to offset the effect of adverse currency exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations or financial condition. In addition, in the specific context of the sovereign debt crisis affecting certain European countries, the threatened or actual withdrawal of the euro as currency in one or more European Monetary Union countries and the associated fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a material effect on our financial condition and earnings, the magnitude and consequences of which are unpredictable. For more information concerning our exchange rate exposure, see "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk."

In the context of the worldwide financial crisis, our liquidity may be constrained.

        As of December 31, 2012, the Group's net debt amounted approximately to €7.7 billion. In addition to debt outstanding, the Group has contracted a number of credit lines and put into place commercial paper and medium term note programs with the aim of providing liquidity. See "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk." In the event of a market-wide liquidity crisis, the Group might be faced with reduced access to sources of financing, including under programs currently in place, or less favorable conditions.

Risks Relating to an Investment in ourOur Shares or ADSs

Foreign exchange fluctuations may adversely affect the U.S. dollar value of our ADSs and dividends (if any).

        Holders of ADSs face exchange rate risk. Our ADSs trade in U.S. dollars and our shares trade in euros. The value of the ADSs and our shares could fluctuate as the exchange rates between these currencies fluctuate. If and when we do pay dividends, they would be denominated in euros. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the euro and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by owners of ADSs upon conversion by the depositary of cash dividends, if any. Moreover, these fluctuations may affect the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), whether or not we pay dividends in addition to the amounts, if any, that a holder would receive upon our liquidation or upon the sale of assets, merger, tender offer or similar transactions denominated in euros or any foreign currency other than U.S. dollars.

Persons holding ADSs rather than shares may have difficulty exercising certain rights as a shareholder.

        Holders of ADSs may have more difficulty exercising their rights as a shareholder than if they directly held shares. For example, if we issue new shares and existing shareholders have the right to subscribe for a portion of

   


(1)(3)
Information in this section is complementary to Note B.8.8. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report, with respect to information required by IFRS 7, and is covered by our independent registered public accounting firms' report on the consolidated financial statements.

Persons holding ADSs rather than shares may have difficulty exercising certain rights as a shareholder.Table of Contents

        Holders of ADSs may have more difficulty exercising their rights as a shareholder than if they directly held shares. For example, if we issue new shares and existing shareholders have the right to subscribe for a portion of them, the depositary is allowed, at its own discretion, to sell for their benefit that right to subscribe for new shares instead of making it available to them. Also, holders of ADSs must instruct the depositary how to vote their shares. Because of this extra procedural step involving the depositary, the process for exercising voting rights will take longer for holders of ADSs than for holders of shares. ADSs for which the depositary does not receive timely voting instructions will not be voted at any meeting.

Recent French tax legislation applicable to the ADSs may affect their attractiveness.

        The implementation of new tax legislation such as the French financial transaction tax of 0.2% (Taxe sur les Transactions Financières — TTF) enacted in 2012 (see "Item 10. — E. Taxation"), which applies by its terms to trading in our shares and ADSs without regard to territoriality could increase the costs linked to the issuance, transfer and cancellation of ADSs. Moreover, uncertainties regarding how such a tax would be assessed and collected from beneficial owners or financial intermediaries outside of France could discourage holding of such instruments.

        We cannot foresee the extent to which this tax and uncertainty over its technical and practical aspects may reduce the liquidity and economic value of our ADSs.

Our largest shareholder owns a significant percentage of the share capital and voting rights of Sanofi.

        As of December 31, 2012,2014, L'Oréal held approximately 8.91%8.96% of our issued share capital, accounting for approximately 16.13%16.28% of the voting rights (excluding treasury shares) of Sanofi. See "Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions — A. Major Shareholders." Affiliates of L'Oréal currently serve on our Board of Directors. To the extent L'Oréal continues to hold a large percentage of our share capital and voting rights, it will remain in a position to exert heightenedgreater influence in the appointment of the directors and officers of Sanofi and in other corporate actions that require shareholders' approval.

Sales of our shares may cause the market price of our shares or ADSs to decline.

        Sales of large numbers of our shares, or a perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price for our shares and ADSs. To our knowledge, L'Oréal, our largest shareholder, is not subject to any contractual restrictions on the sale of the shares it holds in our Company. L'Oréal announced that it does not consider its stake in our Company as strategic to it. Sales of large numbers of our shares, or a perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price for our shares and ADSs.strategic.

Risks Relating to ourOur Contingent Value Rights (CVRs)

In addition to the risks relating to our shares, CVR holders are subject to additional risks.

        In connection with our acquisition of Genzyme, we issued CVRs under a CVR agreement entered into by and between us and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the trustee (see also Note D.18. to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report). A copy of the form of the CVR agreement is attachedon file with the SEC as exhibit 4.1Annex B to ourAmendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-4 (Registration No. 333-172638), as amended.filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2011. Pursuant to the CVR agreement, each holder of a CVR is entitled to receive cash payments upon the achievement of certain milestones, if any, based on U.S. regulatory approvalthe achievement of Lemtrada™certain aggregate net sales thresholds by Lemtrada® (alemtuzumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis), and on achievement of certain aggregate net sales thresholds.. See "Item 10. Additional Information — C. Material Contracts — The Contingent Value Rights Agreement."

        CVR holders are subject to additional risks, including:



Table of Contents


Item 4. Information on the Company

Introduction

        We are an integrated,Sanofi is a leading global healthcare company, focused on patient needs and engaged in the research, development, manufacture and marketing of healthcare products.

        In 2012,2014, our net sales amounted to €34,947were €33,770 million. We are the fourth largest pharmaceutical group in the world and the thirdsecond largest pharmaceutical group in Europe (source: IMSin terms of sales 2012)(IMS data).

        Sanofi is the parent company of a consolidated group of companies. A list of theour principal subsidiaries includedcan be found in this consolidation is shown at Note F.F to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.

        The Sanofi Group is organized around three principal activities: Pharmaceuticals, Human Vaccines via Sanofi Pasteur, and Animal Health via Merial Limited (Merial).Merial. These activities are operating segments within the meaning of the IFRS 8 accounting standard (see Note D.35. to the consolidated financial statements).

        In parallel,We invest in the Group operates through seven growth platformsfollowing activities (see "B. Business Overview — B.1. Strategy" below): Emerging Markets1(1), Diabetes Solutions, Vaccines, Consumer Health Care, Animal Health, New Genzyme,2, and Other Innovative Products3(2).. Unlike the other growth platforms, the Vaccines and Animal Health growth platformsactivities, which are also operating segments within the meaning of IFRS 8. The8, the Diabetes Solutions, Consumer Health Care, New Genzyme, and Other Innovative Products growth platformsactivities are units whose performance is monitored primarily on the basis of their net sales;sales, and the products they sell are part ofincluded in our Pharmaceuticals operating segment. The Emerging Markets growth platform is a unit whoseincludes products from all three of our principal activities (Pharmaceuticals, Human Vaccines and Animal Health), and its performance is monitored primarily on the basis of its net sales; the products it sells are derived from all three of our principal activities: pharmaceuticals, human vaccines and animal health. For an analysis of the netsales.

        Net sales of our growth platformsthese activities for the year ended 2014 are presented in 2012 and 2011, refer to "Item 5.5 — Results of Operations — Year Ended December 31, 20122014 Compared with yearYear Ended December 31, 2011"2013" below.

        Within our Pharmaceuticals activity, which generated net sales of €27,720 million in 2014, we specialize in the following therapeutic areas:

        Rare Diseases and Multiple Sclerosis are the therapeutic areas of our "Genzyme" activity.

   


(1)
World excluding the United States, Canada, Western Europe (France, Germany, UK, Italy, Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Malta, Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden, Portugal, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Ireland, Finland, Norway, Iceland and Denmark), Japan, Australia and New Zealand.

(2)
"New Genzyme" covers rare diseases and treatment for multiple sclerosis.

(3)
"OtherThe "Other Innovative Products" activity covers new product launches since 2009 which do not belong to the other growth platformsactivities listed: Multaq®, Jevtana®, Auvi-Q®, Mozobil® and Zaltrap®.

Table of Contents

        We are a world leader in theOur Human Vaccines (Vaccines) activity is operated through Sanofi Pasteur. Net sales from vaccines industry. Our net sales amounted to €3,897€3,974 million in 2012,2014, with leading vaccines in five areas: pediatric vaccines, influenza vaccines, adult and adolescent booster vaccines, meningitis vaccines, and travel and endemicsendemic vaccines.

        Our Animal Health activity is carried out through Merial, one of the world's leading animal healthcare companies,world leaders in this market. Merial is dedicated to the research, development, manufacture and deliverymarketing of innovative pharmaceuticalspharmaceutical products and vaccines used by veterinarians, farmers and pet owners and providingowners. Its net sales reached €2,076 million in 2014 with a comprehensive linewide range of products to enhanceimprove the health, well-being and performance of a wide rangelarge variety of animals (both production and companion animals. The net salescompanion).

        We obtained regulatory approval for three new products during the last six months of Merial amounted to €2,179 million in 2012.2014: Cerdelga®, Lemtrada® and Fluzone® ID Quadrivalent.

        Partnerships are essential to our business and manya certain number of our products, either on the market or inunder development, have beenare in-licensed from third parties or relyproducts relying on third party technologies and rights.rights or technologies.

        In the description below, the following should be kept in mind:remainder of this section:



A. History and Development of the Company

        The current Sanofi corporation was incorporated under the laws of France in 1994 as asociété anonyme, a form of limited liability company, for a term of 99 years. Since May 2011, we have operated under the commercial name "Sanofi" (formerly known as sanofi-aventis). Our registered office is located at 54, rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France, and our main telephone number is +33 1 53 77 40 00. Our principal U.S. subsidiary's office is located at 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, NJ 08807; telephone: +1 (908) 981-5000.

        We areThe Group is present in approximatelyaround 100 countries onover five continents, with 111,974 employeesand employed 113,496 people at yearthe end 2012. As a global diversified healthcare company our business includes a diversified offering of medicines, consumer healthcare products, generics, animal health and human vaccines.2014.

        The Group has more than a century of experienceservice in the pharmaceutical industry. Sanofi-Synthélabo (formed in 1999 by the merger of Sanofi, founded in 1973, and Synthélabo, founded in 1970) and Aventis (formed in 1999 by the combination of Rhône-Poulenc, formed in 1928, and Hoechst, founded in the second half of the 19th century)1863) were combined in 2004 and are the principal legacy companies of our continuously expanding Group.


Table of Contents

        Starting in 2009, Sanofi beganIn recent years, we have undertaken a strategyseries of targeted acquisitions to become a diversified healthcare company and createdto create new activities or strengthened various platformsstrengthen existing ones, including CHCConsumer Health Care, Generics, Rare Diseases and Generics.Animal Health.



B. Business Overviewoverview

B.1. Strategy

        Sanofi is an integrated,a global healthcare leader offering therapeutic solutions across areas of core historical strength and multiple growth platforms.focused on patients' needs. Like other pharmaceutical groups, active in the pharmaceutical industry, we have beenare facing competition from generics for severalmany of our major products, in an environment subject to strong cost containment pressures from both third party payers and healthcare authorities. We responded to these major challenges by implementing a strategy with the objectiveaim of repositioning Sanofi for more stable and sustainable revenue and earnings growth. Over the pastIn recent years, we have transformed the Group by decreasing our reliance on existing "blockbuster" medicines (medicines with over $1 billion in global annual sales), optimizing our approach to Research &and Development (R&D), and increasing our diversification,diversification.

Growing a global healthcare leader with synergistic platforms

        Our ambition is to offer an integrated set of businesses in the healthcare field, with opportunities to create synergies across our activities, both upstream at the R&D level and downstream in the marketplace. To achieve this objective, Sanofi has been investing in seven growth platforms (Emergingthe following activities: Emerging Markets, Diabetes Solutions, Vaccines, Consumer Health Care, Animal Health, New Genzyme, and Other Innovative Products).

Products. We regularly review our strategy and its implementation, and are continuing to executeapply this strategy alongwith a focus on four prongs:key priorities.

        Our ambition is to offer an integrated set of businesses within the healthcare space with opportunities to create synergies across activities both upstream and R&D level and downstream in the market place.

        We regularly review our R&D portfolio in order to improve the allocation of our resources. Also, ourOur decision-making processes integrateensure that commercial potential and the scope for value creation are factored into our development choices. The result is an ongoing rationalization and optimization of our portfolio, allowing us to focus on high-valuehigh added value projects and, whenwhere appropriate, to reallocate partsome of our resources from internal infrastructureresources to partnerships and collaborations. We have redesigned our R&D footprint, including increasing our presence in the Boston, MA area (United States) with its concentration of universities and innovative biotechnology companies.footprint. Our R&D is now based on an organizational structure focused on meeting patient needs and encouraging entrepreneurship. This network-based organization, open to external opportunities, enables our R&D portfolio to capitalize more effectively capitalize on innovation from a wide range of different sources.

        In line with this policy, we signedentered into new alliance and licensing agreements in 2012during 2014 to give us access to new technologies and/or to broaden or strengthen our existing fieldsareas of research. We have also made progress ontowards our objective of offering more products that addwith added value for patients, with two new pharmaceutical products (Cerdelga® and Lemtrada® in the U.S.) and one new vaccine (Fluzone® ID Quadrivalent in the U.S.) approved in 2014. We currently have nine pharmaceutical projects and six vaccines in late-stage development or in registration. Over the period 2014-2020, up to 18 products are expected to be launched: 12 pharmaceutical products (Cerdelga®, Lemtrada®, Toujeo®, Afrezza®, Praluent®, Lyxumia®, Lixilan, sarilumab, dupilumab, insulin Lispro, patisiran and Anti-CD38 mAB), five innovative products (NMEs) submitted to regulatory agencies in 2012vaccines (Shan5™, Dengue Vaccine, PR5i, a rotavirus vaccine and 18 potential newa Cdiff vaccine) and one animal health product launches possible between now and the end(NexGard®).


Table of 2015.Contents

        Business development remains an integral and disciplined pillara key part of our overall strategy, targeting acquisitions and alliances that create and/or strengthen platforms for long-term growth and create value for our shareholders. Since January 2009, we haveWe invested a total of approximately €24around €2.3 billion in external growth. During 2012, we actively pursuedgrowth in 2014 in line with this targeted policy, announcing 26several new transactions (acquisitions of assets, equity investments, partnerships) including 8 acquisitionswith Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and 18 major R&D alliances.Bayer (Germany/equine products). We also entered into a number of collaborations during 2014, including with Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in rare genetic diseases; with Eli Lilly on Cialis® over the counter; and with Mannkind on Afrezza®.

        In 2012, we strengthenedWe increased our Emerging Markets growth platformequity interest in the biopharmaceutical company Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. to 22.3% as of December 31, 2014, compared with 15.9% as of December 31, 2013. Since the agreement to acquire Genfar S.A. (announcedbeginning of April 2014, our investment in October 2012), a leading pharmaceuticals manufacturer headquartered in Bogota, Colombia. Also, we acquired the rights to lines of generic productsRegeneron has been accounted for Sub Saharan Africa and for Vietnam. With these acquisitions, Sanofi intends to become a market leader in both Colombia and Nigeria, and has expanded its portfolio of affordable pharmaceuticals in Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia.

        Our animal health business was also reinforced in 2012 by the acquisition of Newport Laboratories, a privately held company based in Worthington, Minnesota (United States), a leader in autogenous vaccines with a focus on swine and bovine production markets, and withequity method (see Note D.1. to the agreement to acquire the Animal Health Division of Dosch


Pharmaceuticals in India (announced end of December 2012)consolidated financial statements). When completed, this last acquisition will create a market entry for Merial in that country's strategically important and growing Indian animal health sector.

        In the years to come, we expect our sound financial position to provide us the potential to create value throughcontinue our external growth opportunitiesstrategy, to access external innovation and tofurther strengthen our diversification and growth platforms through new acquisitions and partnerships.operations. We will remain financially disciplined within the aims ofin line with our business development activities,policy, so that we can execute strategically important transactions and partnerships that delivercapable of delivering a return on investment in excess of our cost of capital.

        We have adapted our operating model, previously focused on the best-selling prescription drugs in our traditional markets, to a broader set of products and services that better reflect the diversity and geographical reach of our activities and our geographical reach.activities. In particular, we have tailored our strategy, structure and product offering to the needs of each region's needs,region, so as to deliver the most appropriate solution to each patient. The result isThis has led to a dramatic shift in businessour product mix, and the shift in focus from our top 15blockbuster products to key growth platforms. In 2008, 61% of our sales originatedcame from our top 15 top-selling products, while in 2012, 67.4%76.4% of our 2014 sales were generated by our growth platforms. In addition, 31.9%33.6% of our 20122014 sales were in emerging markets,Emerging Markets, where we have enhancedexpanded our offerings in high growth segmentshigh-growth areas such as Generics and Consumer Health Care by completing 25 transactions and investing a total of approximately €3.9 billion in acquisitions over the last four years.Care.

        We have also realigned our industrial capacity so as to reflect our expectation of changes in volumesproduction forecasts and our analyses of growth opportunities. CombinedTogether with the streamlining of our R&D structures and tight control over our selling, general and administrative expenses, this has helped us successfully navigate aof this period induring which manyseveral of our leading products faced the loss ofmedicines lost patent exclusivity, protection, in a tougher economic environmentclimate with new healthcare cost containment measures in many markets.

Pharmaceutical Products        We have also invested in the biotechnology sector, demonstrating our belief in biotechnology and innovation. In addition to the collaboration and partnership agreements described in this report, we also use our investment fund Sanofi Genzyme BioVentures (SGBV) to invest in promising companies in the biotechnology field, such as Unum Therapeutics and Lysosomal Therapeutics Inc.

        Within ourthe Pharmaceuticals business, we focus onour most important products can be grouped into the following therapeutic areas:key fields of diabetes solutions, rare diseases, multiple sclerosis, oncology.oncology, thrombosis and cardiovascular disease prevention, nephrology and biosurgery. We have also have flagship productsdeveloped a significant presence in such fields as anti-thrombotics, cardiovascular, renal and biosurgery and have developed leading businesses in Consumer Health Careconsumer health care and generics.

        The sections that followbelow provide additional information on the indications and market position of our key products. Our intellectual property rights over our pharmaceutical products are material to our operations and are described at "— Patents, Intellectual Property and Other Rights" below. As disclosed in "Item 8. Financial Information — A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information — Patents" of this annual report. Wereport, we are involved in significant litigation concerning the patent protection of a number of these products.


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forthbelow shows the net sales of ourthe main pharmaceutical products for the year ended December 31, 2012.2014.

Therapeutic Area / Product Name

20122014
Net Sales
(€ million)


Drug Category / Main Areas of Use
 

Diabetes Solutions

     

Lantus® (insulin glargine)

 4,9606,344 Long-acting analog of human insulin


•  Type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Amaryl® (glimepiride)

360Sulfonylurea
•  Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Apidra® (insulin glulisine)

 230336 Rapid-acting analog of human insulin


•  Type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Insuman® (insulin)

 135137 Human insulin (rapid and intermediate acting)


•  Type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Amaryl® (glimepiride)Lyxumia® (lixisenatide)

27GLP-1 receptor agonist
•  Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rare Diseases

  421Sulfonylurea

• Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rare Diseases   

Cerezyme® (imiglucerase for injection)

 633715 Enzyme replacement therapy

•  Gaucher disease
  

Myozyme®/Lumizyme® (alglucosidase alpha)

542Enzyme replacement therapy
•  Pompe disease
  

• Gaucher disease

Fabrazyme® (agalsidase beta)

 292460 Enzyme replacement therapy

•  Fabry disease
  

Aldurazyme® (laronidase)

172Enzyme replacement therapy
•  Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I
  

• Fabry disease

Myozyme®/Lumizyme® (alglucosidaseMultiple Sclerosis

  462Enzyme replacement therapy

alpha)

• Pompe disease

Multiple Sclerosis   

Aubagio® (teriflunomide)

 7433 Oral immunomodulating agent

•  MS
  

Lemtrada® (alemtuzumab)

 

34

Humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD52 antigen
•  Multiple Sclerosis

OncologyMS  
 

Oncology




Jevtana® (cabazitaxel)

273Cytotoxic agent
•  Prostate cancer
  

Taxotere® (docetaxel)

 563266 Cytotoxic agent


Breast cancer


Non small cell lung cancer


Prostate cancer


Gastric cancer


Head and neck cancer

Eloxatine®Thymoglobulin® (anti-thymocyte globulin)

217Polyclonal anti-human thymocyte antibody preparation
•  Acute rejection in organ transplantation
•  Aplastic anemia
•  Graft-versus-Host Disease

Eloxatin® (oxaliplatin)

 956210 Cytotoxic agent

•  Colorectal cancer
  

• Colorectal cancer

Jevtana® (cabazitaxel)

235Cytotoxic agent

• Prostate cancer

Mozobil® (plerixafor)

 96111 Hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer

•  Hematologic maligancies
  

• Hematologic maligancies

Zaltrap® (aflibercept)

 2569 Recombinant fusion protein


•  Oxaliplatin resistant metastatic colorectal cancer


Table of Contents


Therapeutic Area / Product Name

20122014
Net Sales
(€ million)


Drug Category / Main Areas of Use
 

Other Prescription Drugs

   

Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate)

1,862Platelet adenosine disphosphate receptor antagonist
•  Atherothrombosis
•  Acute coronary syndrome with and without ST segment elevation
  

Lovenox® (enoxaparin sodium)

 1,8931,699 Low molecular weight heparin


Treatment and prevention of deep vein thrombosis


Treatment of acute coronary syndromes

Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate)

  2,066Platelet adenosine disphosphate receptor antagonist

Atherothrombosis

Acute coronary syndrome with and without ST segment elevation

Aprovel® (irbesartan) / CoAprovel® (irbesartan & hydrochlorothiazide)

 1,151727 Angiotensin II receptor antagonist

(irbesartan & hydrochlorothiazide)


•  Hypertension
  

• Hypertension

Multaq® (dronedarone)

255Anti-arrhythmic drug

• Atrial Fibrillation

Renagel® (sevelamer hydrochloride) / Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate)

 653684 Oral phosphate binders

Renvala® (sevelamer carbonate)


•  High phosphorus levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis

Depakine® (sodium valproate)

395Anti-epileptic
•  Epilepsy

Synvisc® / Synvisc-One®

363Viscosupplements

(hylan (hylan G-F 20)

 352 

Viscosupplements
•  Pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee

Stilnox® /Ambien®/ Ambien® / Myslee® (zolpidem

497Hypnotic

tartrate)

 306Hypnotic
•  Sleep disorders
  

Multaq® (dronedarone)

290Anti-arrhythmic drug
•  Sleep disorders

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Allegra® (fexofenadine hydrochloride)

 553192&zwsp;(1)Anti-histamine

•  Allergic rhinitis
•  Urticaria
  

Actonel® (risedronate sodium)

82Biphosphonate
•  Osteoporosis
•  Paget's disease
  

Allergic rhinitisAuvi-Q® / Allerject™

72Epinephrine auto-injector

Urticaria

  Emergency treatment of severe allergic reactions

Depakine® (sodium valproate)Consumer Health Care

  410Anti-epileptic

• Epilepsy

Consumer Health Care   

Total

 3,3373,008  

Generics

     

Total

 1,8051,844  
 
(1)
Excluding Allegra® OTC sales.


a)    Diabetes Solutions

        The prevalence of diabetes is expected to increase significantly by 2030, reflecting multiple socio-economic factors including sedentary lifestyles, excess weight and obesity, unhealthy diet and an aging population. Our principal diabetes products are Lantus®, a long-actinglong acting analog of human insulin; Amaryl®, a sulfonylurea; Apidra®, a rapid-actingrapid acting analog of human insulin; and Insuman®, a human insulin; and Amaryl®, a sulfonylurea. In 2011, in some European markets, we launched the BGStar® range of blood glucose meter solutions for patients with diabetes, whether they are treated with insulin or not.insulin. In February 2013, the European Commission granted marketing authorisationauthorization in Europe for Lyxumia®, a once-dailyonce daily prandial GLP-1 receptor agonist.

        Two new products are being launched in 2015: Toujeo® (U300) and Afrezza®.

Afrezza®

        Afrezza® is a rapid acting inhaled insulin indicated to improve glycemic control in adult patients with diabetes. The product was launched in the United States at the beginning of February 2015. Afrezza® is in-licensed from MannKind.


        Lantus® (insulin glargine) is a long-actinglong acting analog of human insulin, offering an improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Lantus® is indicated for once-dailyonce daily subcutaneous administration in the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who require basal insulin for the control of hyperglycemia, and for adult and pediatric patients aged two years (label extension for pediatric use was granted in the EUE.U. in 2012) and aboveaged two years with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

        Lantus® is the most studied basal insulin with over 10ten years of clinical evidence in diabetes treatment and a well-establishedwell established safety profile.

        Lantus® can be administered subcutaneously using syringes or specific pens including:

        In their 2012 updates, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) have maintained their 2008 treatment recommendations for type 2 diabetes. This consensus statement further established basal insulins such as Lantus®, or a sulfonylurea such as Amaryl®, as two preferred second-linesecond line treatment options for people with diabetes who are unable to achieve glycemic control targets with lifestyle intervention and metformin (which reduces hepatic glucose production and decreases insulin resistance) alone. These treatment recommendations reinforce the timely use of basal insulin as a core therapy for type 2 diabetes.


Table of Contents

        Lantus® is the world number-onenumber one selling insulin brand in terms of both sales and units (source: IMS, 2012 sales) and is available in over 120 countries worldwide. The three leading countries for sales of Lantus® in 20122014 were the United States, France, China, and Japan.

        The epidemiological program sponsored by Sanofi was aimed at evaluating cancer risk in diabetes and generating comprehensive insulin glargine exposure data from large databases. It is the largest observational program designed for this purpose to date. The program results reinforce the robust safety profile of Lantus®, complementing the existing wealth of data already available from more than 80,000 patients enrolled in clinical trials.Germany.

        In the United States, Sanofi's pediatric regulatory exclusivity for the Lantus compound expired in February 2015. The now completed epidemiological program comprised three major studies. These were designed independently of the company by the lead investigators and endorsed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and shared with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). They used state-of-the-art biostatistical methodology with protocols that were discussed with a senior-level Biostatistics Advisory Group:


        ORIGIN was a seven-year randomized clinical trial designed to assess the effects of treatment with insulin glargine versus standard care on cardiovascular outcomes. This landmark study involved over 12,500 participants worldwide with pre-diabetes or early type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular (CV) risk, with 6,264 participants randomized to receive insulin glargine titrated to achieve fasting normoglycemia. The co-primary endpoints were the composite of CV death, or non-fatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke; and the composite of CV death, or non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke, or revascularization procedure, or hospitalization for heart failure.

        Results showed that Lantus® had no statistically significant positive or negative impact on CV outcomes versus standard care during the study period. ResultsMay 2015. Sanofi also showed that insulin glargine delayed progression from pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes and there was no association between insulin glargine use and increased risk of any cancer. (New England Journal of Medicine, July 2012)

        Sanofi is sponsoring a 2-year extension to ORIGIN, called ORIGINALE (Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention and Legacy Effect).

        The results of the ORIGIN trial have been filed with the FDA and the EMA to updatehas patents protecting the Lantus® dossier at the end of 2012.

        Apidra® (insulin glulisine) is a rapid-acting analog of human insulin. Apidra® is indicated for the treatment of adults with type 1 diabetes, orformulation and devices which deliver Lantus® that are currently in type 2 diabetes for supplementary glycemic control. Apidra® has a more rapid onsetlitigation and shorter duration of action than fast-acting human insulinwhich expire on varying dates between 2023 and can be in combination with long-acting insulins such as Lantus® for supplementary glycemic control at mealtime.

        In addition, Apidra® is equally effective in adult diabetics ranging from lean to obese and offers patients greater flexibility of administration, either before or just after mealtime.

        Apidra® can be administered subcutaneously using syringes or specific pens including the Apidra® SoloSTAR® disposable pen and the ClikSTAR® reusable pen.

        Apidra® is available in over 100 countries worldwide.

        After a temporary shortage of Apidra® 3mL cartridges2028 (including Apidra® SoloSTAR®) in 2011 which impacted supplies in some markets, production of Apidra® 3mL cartridges returned to full capacity in the first half of 2012.pediatric regulatory exclusivity).

        Insuman® (human insulin) is a range of insulin solutions and suspensions for injection and is indicated for diabetes patients where treatment with insulin is required. Human insulin is produced by recombinant DNA technology inEscherichia colistrains.

        Insuman® is supplied in vials, cartridges, pre-filled disposable pens (OptiSet® and SoloSTAR®) or reusable pens (ClickSTAR®) containing the active substance human insulin. The Insuman® range is comprised of rapid-acting insulin solutions (Insuman® Rapid and Insuman® Infusat) that contain soluble insulin, an intermediate-acting insulin suspension (Insuman® Basal) that contains isophane insulin, and combinations of fast- and intermediate-acting insulins in various proportions (Insuman® Comb). Insuman® is principally sold in Germany.


        Amaryl® (glimepiride) is a latest-generation,an orally administered once-dailyonce daily sulfonylurea (a glucose-loweringglucose lowering agent), available either in simple form or in combination with metformin, indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Amaryl® reduces the body's blood sugar level in two ways: by helping the body to produce more insulin both at mealtimemealtimes and between meals, and by decreasing insulin resistance.

        The combination of metformin (which reduces hepatic glucose production and decreases insulin resistance) with a sulfonylurea such as Amaryl® is effectivesubject to generic competition in combating the two causes of type 2 diabetes. It is one of the most prescribed combinations of diabetes drugs worldwide. Amaryl M®, a fixed-dose combination of Amaryl® plus metformin in a single presentation, was launched in 2007.

        A number of generics have received marketing authorization and have been launched in Europe, the United States and Japan.

        Sanofi and its partner AgaMatrix are co-developing intelligent solutions in diabetes care that demonstrate their commitment to simplifying and innovating the diabetes management experience for people with diabetes and healthcare providers. TheThese blood glucose monitoring solutions are exclusive to Sanofi and are designed to be synergistic with the rest of theour diabetes treatment portfolio. BGStar®, iBGStar® and iBGStar®MyStar Extra® are modern and intelligent blood glucose monitoring solutions which are easy to use, accurate, reliable and fit the lifestyle of people with diabetes today:

trend over the last 10 days, and estimation of the A1C trend. MyStar Extra® launched in October 2013 is available in most European countries including Italy, Spain, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. BGStar® and iBGStar® are available in most European Countries (including France, Germany, Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom), in Canada and in some other countries including Brazil.

        These monitoring devices are an important step towards Sanofi'sour vision of becoming theremaining a global leader in diabetes care by integrating intelligent monitoring technology, therapeutic innovations, personalized services and support solutions.

        BGStar® and iBGStar® are available in France, Germany, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg, Canada, Estonia, Australia, the UK and the Philippines. iBGStar® is also available in the United States and Saudi Arabia.

        Lyxumia® (lixisenatide) is a once-daily prandial GLP-1 receptor agonist. In February 2013, the European Commission granted marketing authorization in Europe for Lyxumia® indicated for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus to achieve glycemic control in combination with oral glucose-lowering medicinal products and/or basal insulin when these, together with diet and exercise, do not provide adequate glycemic control. On completion of pricing and reimbursement discussions, Sanofi will initiate a phased launch of Lyxumia® throughout the European Union. Applications for regulatory approval were also submitted in several other countries around the world and are being reviewed. The FDA accepted the file for review in February 2013.

        Additional Phase IIIb studies have been initiated and the ELIXA cardiovascular outcomes trial is ongoing.

        A proof-of-concept study to compare insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination versus insulin glargine on glycemic control over 24 weeks has been fully recruited.

        GLP-1 is a naturally-occurring peptide hormone that is released within minutes after eating a meal. It is known to suppress glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha cells and stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion by pancreatic beta cells.

        The active ingredient of Lyxumia® is in-licensed from Zealand Pharma.


The main compound currently in Phase III clinical development in the Diabetes field is New Glargine Formulation: A new formulation of insulin glargine with an improved pharmacodynamic profile is now in Phase III clinical testing. In addition to the two Phase III studies started during 2011, in the second half of 2012 the EDITION III and IV Phase III trials were initiated together with two dedicated clinical studies in Japan.


b)    Rare Diseases

        The acquisition of Genzyme in 2011 brought to the Group specificspecialized expertise in rare diseases, a sector where there are stillremain many unmet medical needs, and expanded Sanofi'sour presence in the biotechnology sector.

        Our Rare DiseaseDiseases business is focused on products for the treatment of rare genetic diseases and other chronic debilitating diseases, including lysosomal storage disorders, or LSDs, a group of metabolic disorders caused by enzyme deficiencies. Our principal rare disease products are enzyme replacement therapies: Cerezyme® (imiglucerase for injection) to treat Gaucher disease, Fabrazyme® (agalsidase beta) to treat Fabry disease and Myozyme® / Lumizyme® (alglucosidase alpha) to treat Pompe disease. In January 2013, Kynamro™ (mipomersen), an antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits the synthesis of apolipoprotein B-100, was approved by the FDA for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

        Cerezyme® (imiglucerase for injection) is an enzyme replacement therapy used to treat Gaucher disease, an inherited, potentially life-threateninglife threatening LSD. It is estimated that there are approximately 10,000 Gaucher patients worldwide.

        Cerezyme® is the only therapy with an 18-yeara 19 year history of reducing, relieving and reversing many of the symptoms and risks of Type 1 and Type 3 (in certain markets) Gaucher disease. Cerezyme® is administered by intravenous infusion over 1-2one or two hours.

        In 2012, significant progress was made in resolving supply challenges encountered starting in 2009, and successfully restoring existing patients in major markets to normal dosing. For more information regarding manufacturing issues related to Cerezyme®, see "Item 4 — Information on the Company — Production and Raw Materials".

        The principal markets for Cerezyme® are the United States, Europe and Latin America.

        Fabrazyme® (agalsidase beta)Cerdelga® (eliglustat) is anthe only first-line oral therapy for Gaucher disease type 1.

        A potent, highly specific ceramide analogue inhibitor of GL-1 synthesis with broad tissue distribution, Cerdelga�� has demonstrated efficacy in patients who switch from enzyme replacement therapy used to treat Fabry(ERT), as well as in untreated patients. The Cerdelga® development program is the largest ever in Gaucher disease, an inherited, progressive and potentially life-threatening LSD. Fabry disease is estimated to affect between 5,000 and 10,000 people worldwide. Fabrazyme® is administered by intravenous infusion.with almost 400 patients treated in 29 countries.

        Fabrazyme®The principal market for Cerdelga® currently is available in over 30 countries, including the United States and Europe.

        The strong recovery of Fabrazyme®, following manufacturing issues which began in 2009, continued in 2012 with theStates. It received European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval of the new Framingham plant in January 2012, stable production runs, the return of all existing patients in all markets to full dose and the addition of new patients. In the U.S., Fabrazyme® also benefited from Shire's withdrawal of the Replagal® BLA. For more information regarding manufacturing issues related to Fabrazyme®, see "Item 4 — Information on the Company — Production and Raw Materials".2015.

        Myozyme®        Myozyme® / Lumizyme® (alglucosidase alpha) are enzyme replacement therapies used to treat Pompe disease, an inherited, progressive and often fatal LSD. We estimate that there are approximately 10,000 Pompe patients worldwide.

        Myozyme®        Myozyme® has been marketed since 2006 in the United States and the EUEuropean Union and is currently available in 48 markets worldwide. Lumizyme® is the first treatment approved inOutside the United States, specifically to treatMyozyme® is marketed for patients


with late-onset Pompe disease: Lumizyme®both infantile and late onset disease. Lumizyme® has been marketed since June 2010. Myozyme2010 in the United States. Initially designed


Table of Contents® and Lumizyme® are administered by intravenous infusion. Lumizyme® is used

specifically to treat patients with late onset Pompe disease inand patients over eight years of age without evidence of cardiac hypertrophy.hypertrophy, since August 1, 2014 it has also been approved for infantile onset Pompe Disease.

        Myozyme® and Lumizyme® are administered by intravenous infusion. Both products are a recombinant form of the same human enzyme but are manufactured using different sized bioreactors.enzyme.

        Kynamro™ (mipomersen)Fabrazyme® (agalsidase beta) is an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)enzyme replacement therapy used to treat Fabry disease, an inherited, progressive and potentially life threatening LSD.

        Fabry disease is estimated to be diagnosed in over 10,000 people worldwide.

        Fabrazyme® is administered by intravenous infusion.

        Fabrazyme® is available in over 40 countries around the world.

Aldurazyme®

        Aldurazyme® (laronidase) is an enzyme replacement therapy used to treat Mucopolysaccaridosis Type I (MPS I). MPS I occurs in approximately one in 100,000 newborns worldwide, but incidence and the prevalence of phenotypic groups varies from region to region.

        The principal markets for Aldurazyme® are the United States, Europe and Latin America.

c)    Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

        Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease in which a person's immune system attacks the central nervous system, damaging myelin, the protective sheath that inhibitscovers nerve fibers. This causes a break in communication between the synthesis of apoB, a primary protein constituent of atherogenic lipoproteins. Mipomersen is being developed, in collaboration with Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc., forbrain and the treatment of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) and severe heterozygous FH (HeFH). FH is a genetic disorder that causes chronic and lifelong exposure to markedly elevated concentrations and numbers of atherogenic, apoB-containing lipoproteins (LDL, Lp(a)) leading to premature and severe cardiovascular disease. On January 29, 2013, Genzyme and Isis announced the FDA approval of Kynamro™ (Mipomersen sodium) for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. On December 14, 2012 Genzyme and Isis announced that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) had adopted a negative opinion for its marketing authorization application submitted in 2011. In January 2013, Genzyme requested a re-examinationrest of the CHMP opinion.body, ultimately destroying the nerves themselves, and causing irreversible damage. More than 2 million people suffer from MS worldwide.

        The main compounds currently in Phase II or III clinical development in the Rare Diseases field are:

        Our Multiple Sclerosis franchise is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies thatto treat this chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. More than 2 million people suffer from MS worldwide. OurMS. Genzyme's MS franchise consists of Aubagio® (teriflunomide), a once daily, oral immunomodulator, that is approved in the United States and Australia, and Lemtrada™Lemtrada® (alemtuzumab), a monoclonal antibody thatantibody. Both products have been developed to treat patients with relapsing forms of MS. In addition to its marketed therapies Lemtrada® and Aubagio®, Genzyme has completed two Phase III pivotal studiesan MS R&D pipeline focused on investigational treatments to address unmet needs for relapsing and has marketing applications under review by regulatory authoritiesprogressive forms of MS. Genzyme's R&D programs are pursuing research in the U.S.selective immunomodulation, neuroprotection and Europe.remyelination.

        Aubagio® (teriflunomide), ana small molecule immunomodulatory agent with anti-inflammatory properties, reversibly inhibits dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, a mitochondrial enzyme involved in de novo pyrimidine synthesis. The exact mechanism by which teriflunomide exerts its therapeutic effect in MS is unknown but may involve a reduction in the number of activated lymphocytes in the CNS. Aubagio® has shown significant efficacy across key measures of MS disease activity, including reducing relapses, slowing the progression of physical disability, reducing relapses, and reducing the number of brain lesions as detected by MRI. Results of the first pivotal study (TEMSO), indicating that the product had an effect on disease activity in terms of relapse rate, disability progression and brain lesions with a favorable safety profile, were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in October 2011. Results from the second pivotal study (TOWER) were presented at 28th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research


in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) in October 2012. These results showed that Aubagio® significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate and slowed progression of disability in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis compared to placebo. Aubagio® is the first and only oral MS therapy to significantly slow the progression of disability in two Phase III trials.trials (TEMSO and TOWER) and is the only oral therapy shown to prevent or delay a second clinical attack in patients who have experienced initial neurological symptoms suggestive of MS (TOPIC). In 2014, the U.S. labeling was updated to incorporate the results of TOWER, and the U.S. and E.U. labeling were updated to include the results of TOPIC.

        Ongoing development efforts include the TeriKIDS study to assess the safety and efficacy of teriflunomide in children (10-17 years old), global post-marketing registries for pregnancy, and a post-approval study that will evaluate long-term safety in the marketed population using data from selected national health registries in Europe.

        Aubagio® received FDA approvalwas approved in the United States in September 2012 for patientsAugust 2013 and is now approved in more than 50 countries around the world, including the European Union and Brazil, with relapsing forms of MS. The product also received regulatory approval in Australia in November 2012. Marketingadditional marketing applications for Aubagio® are currently under review by the European Medicines Agencyregulatory authorities globally. Including clinical trials and other regulatory authorities.commercial use, approximately 30,000 patients have been treated with Aubagio® to date.


Table of Contents

        The main compound currently in Phase III clinical development in the multiple sclerosis field is Lemtrada™Lemtrada® (alemtuzumab) (alemtuzumab),is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD52 antigen abundant on the surface of B and T lymphocytes leading to changes in the circulating lymphocyte pool.antigen. Alemtuzumab has beenwas developed to treat patients with relapsing forms of MS. The two pivotal Phase IIIIn September 2014, interim results from the second year of the extension of the CARE MS studies demonstratingwere presented at the safetyEuropean Committee for Research and efficacyTreatment in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) meeting. In this analysis of alemtuzumab were completed in 2011 and the results were published in thepatients who received 2 courses of LemtradaLancet® in November 2012. The firstCARE MS I and II (at start of study CARE-MS I, demonstrated strong and robust treatment effect on12 months later) and then completed their fourth year of follow-up (second year of the extension study), relapse rate co-primary endpoint vs Rebif in treatment-naive MS patients. The co-primary endpoint of disability progression (time torates and sustained accumulation of disability: SAD)disability remained low. In approximately 70 percent of patients, disability scores improved or remained stable for an additional two years beyond the two-year pivotal multiple sclerosis studies, and approximately 70 percent of patients who received Lemtrada® in the pivotal studies did not meet statistical significance. Thereceive further treatment with Lemtrada® through the second study, CARE-MS II, demonstrated that relapse rate and SADyear of the extension study. No new safety signals were significantly reducedidentified.

        In September 2013, Lemtrada® was granted marketing authorization in the European Union for treatment of adult patients with relapsing forms of MS with active disease defined by clinical or imaging features. Since then, Lemtrada® has been approved by regulatory authorities in several countries in the world including Brazil. In November 2014, the U.S. FDA approved Lemtrada® for the treatment of patients receiving alemtuzumab as compared with Rebif in MSrelapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Because of its safety profile, the FDA approval limited use of Lemtrada® to patients who have had relapsed on prior therapy. Results from CARE-MS II also showed that patients treated with Lemtrada™ were significantlyan inadequate response to two or more likely to experience improvement in disability scores than those treated with Rebif, suggesting a reversaldrugs indicated for the treatment of disability in some patients. In both pivotal studies, safety results were consistent with previous alemtuzumab use in MS and adverse events continued to be manageable. Marketingincluded a black box warning on potential side effects. Lemtrada® is only available in the U.S. through a restricted program called the LEMTRADA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program. Lemtrada® is currently approved in more than 40 countries Additional marketing applications for Lemtrada™Lemtrada® are currently under review by regulatory authorities.agencies around the world.


d)    Oncology

        Sanofi has started to diversify its        We have a portfolio of 10 marketed products in Oncology, and diversified our presence in the oncology field beyond chemotherapy (Eloxatine®(Taxotere®, Taxotere®Jevtana®, Eloxatin®) with Thymoglobulin® and Jevtana®),Mozobil® and launchedwith an angiogenesis inhibitor, Zaltrap®Zaltrap®, in August 2012 in the U.S.

        Taxotere® (docetaxel), a taxoid class derivative, inhibits cancer cell division by essentially "freezing" the cell's internal skeleton, which is comprised of microtubules. Microtubules assemble and disassemble during a cell cycle. Taxotere® promotes their assembly and blocks their disassembly, thereby preventing many cancer cells from dividing and resulting in death in many cancer cells.

        Taxotere® is available in more than 90 countries as an injectable solution. The single vial formulation (one vial IV route 20-80mg) was launched in the U.S. and in the European Union in 2010. It has been approved for use in eleven indications in five different tumor types (breast, prostate, gastric, lung, and head and neck). Taxotere® is indicated for early stage and metastatic breast cancer, first-line and second-line metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), androgen-independent (hormone-refractory) metastatic prostate cancer, advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction), and the induction treatment of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

        The top four countries contributing to sales of Taxotere® in 2012 were the United States, Japan, China and Russia. Generics of docetaxel were launched at the end of 2010 in Europe, in April 2011 in the U.S., and in December 2012 in Japan (see "— Patents, Intellectual Property and Other Rights" below).

        Eloxatine® (oxaliplatin) is a platinum-based cytotoxic agent. Eloxatine®, in combination with infusional (delivered through the bloodstream) administration of two other chemotherapy drugs, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (the FOLFOX regimen), is approved by the FDA for adjuvant treatment of people with stage III colon cancer who have had their primary (original) tumors surgically removed. This approval was based on evidence of an improvement in disease-free survival after four years.


        Eloxatine® is in-licensed from Debiopharm and is marketed in more than 70 countries worldwide. The top four countries contributing to sales of Eloxatine® in 2012 were the United States, Canada, China, and South Korea.

        Following the end of Eloxatine® European regulatory data exclusivity in April 2006, a number of oxaliplatin generics have been launched throughout Europe. Market exclusivity in the United States was lost on August 9, 2012. Several generics of oxaliplatin are available globally, exceptand in Canada where Eloxatine® still has exclusivity.2013 in the European Union.

        Jevtana® (cabazitaxel), a cytotoxic agent, is a semisynthetic taxane derivativepromoting tubulin assembly and stabilizing microtubules, approved in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-containing treatment regimen. Jevtana® was the result of a 14-year research and development program to address the significant unmet medical need after taxane-based treatment progression.

        Jevtana® was launched in the United States in 2010. In the United States, Jevtana® therapy is now covered by CMS (Committee(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), and by most of the private insurance companies that pay for oncology care. In addition, the safety profile seen in clinical practice has been consistent with that seen in the pivotal TROPIC study.

        In March 2011, Jevtana® received marketing authorization from the European Commission. The product was launched duringIn July 2014, the second quarter of 2011 in Germany and the UK.Japanese Health Authority (PMDA) granted marketing authorization for Jevtana®, which is now approved in 78over 80 countries.

        Sanofi has initiated a broad development program with Jevtana®. Two post-marketing requirement phase III studies are ongoing in first- and second-line chemotherapy treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients. The clinical program is projected to evaluatealso evaluating Jevtana® in first- and second-line treatment of prostate cancer patients, second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients, and pediatric patients with brain cancer.cancer (phase I/II ongoing).

        The main countries contributing to sales of Jevtana® in 2014 were the United States, France, Germany, Italy and the UK.

Taxotere®

        Taxotere® (docetaxel), a taxoid class derivative, inhibits cancer cell division by essentially "freezing" the cell's internal skeleton, which is comprised of microtubules. Microtubules assemble and disassemble during a cell cycle. Taxotere® promotes their assembly and blocks their disassembly, thereby preventing many cancer cells from dividing, which ultimately results in destroying many cancer cells.

        Taxotere® is available in more than 90 countries as an injectable solution. It has been approved for use in 11 indications in five different tumor types (breast, prostate, gastric, lung, and head and neck). Taxotere® is indicated for early stage and metastatic breast cancer, first-line and second-line metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer


Table of Contents

(NSCLC), androgen-independent (hormone-refractory) metastatic prostate cancer, advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction), and the induction treatment of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The top four countries contributing to sales of Jevtana®Taxotere® in 20122014 were Japan, China, Taiwan and South Korea. Generics of docetaxel were launched in Europe, in the United States, and in Japan (see "— Patents, Intellectual Property and Other Rights" below).

Eloxatin®

        Eloxatin® (oxaliplatin) is a platinum-based cytotoxic agent. Eloxatin®, in combination with infusional administration of two other chemotherapy drugs, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (the FOLFOX regimen), is approved by the FDA for adjuvant treatment of people with stage III colon cancer who have had their primary tumors surgically removed. This approval was based on evidence of an improvement in disease-free survival after four years.

        Eloxatin® is in-licensed from Debiopharm and is marketed in more than 70 countries worldwide.

        Following the end of Eloxatin® European regulatory data exclusivity in April 2006, a number of oxaliplatin generics have been launched throughout Europe. Market exclusivity in the United States was lost in 2012. In the second quarter of 2013, Eloxatin® received regulatory approval for advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in China. Several generics of oxaliplatin are available globally, except in Canada where Eloxatin® still has exclusivity until December 2015.

        The main three countries contributing to sales of Eloxatin® in 2014 were Canada, China and the United States.

Thymoglobulin®

        Thymoglobulin® (Anti-thymocyte Globulin) is a polyclonal anti-human thymocyte antibody preparation that acts as a broad immuno-suppressive and immuno-modulating agent. The product's primary mechanism of action is T-cell depletion, which is complemented by a host of other immuno-modulating effects. Thymoglobulin® is currently marketed in over 65 countries. Depending on the country, Thymoglobulin® is indicated for the treatment and/or prevention of acute rejection in organ transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy in aplastic anemia, and/or the treatment and/or prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

        The main countries contributing to Thymoglobulin® sales in 2014 were the U.S., Germany, ItalyUnited States, China, France and Brazil.Japan.

        Mozobil® (plerixafor injection) is a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer indicated in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM).

        The main countries contributing to Mozobil® sales in 20122014 were the U.S.,United States, Germany, France, the U.K.UK and Italy.France.

        Zaltrap® (aflibercept) is a recombinant fusion protein which acts as a soluble decoy receptor that binds to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A (VEGF-A), VEGF-B and placental growth factor (PIGF), preventing the bound VEGF from binding to their native receptors. VEGF-A is one of the mediators contributing to angiogenesis. VEGF-B and PlGF, related growth factors in the VEGF family, may contribute to tumor angiogenesis as well. In the U.S., Zaltrap® is a registered trademark of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

        In the U.S.,United States, Zaltrap® is approved under the U.S. proper name ziv-aflibercept for use in combination with FOLFIRI, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that is resistant to or has progressed following an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. Zaltrap® ishas been marketed in the U.S. inUnited States since August 2012.

        In the European Union, Zaltrap® (aflibercept) was approved in February 2013 by the European Commission to treat metastatic colorectal cancer that is resistant to or has progressed after an oxaliplatin-containing regimen.


Table of Contents

        Zaltrap® was approved in a further 18 countries in 2014, and is now approved in over 50 countries worldwide. Marketing authorization applications are under review in several other countries.

        The marketingmain countries contributing to sales of Zaltrap® is organized through our collaboration with Regeneron (seein 2014 were the United States, Germany, France and the United Kingdom.

        For additional information on the commercialization of this product, see "Item 5 — Financial Presentation of Alliances — Alliance Arrangements with Regeneron").

        Concerning the development program for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, the Phase III VENICE trial (First-line treatment for androgen-independent (hormone-refractory) metastatic prostate cancer in combination


with docetaxel and prednisone) did not meet the pre-specified criterion of improvement in overall survival. The safety profile was generally consistent with previous studies of Zaltrap® in combination with docetaxel.

The oncology R&D pipeline includes a broad spectrum of novel agents with a variety of mechanisms of action for treating cancer, including cytotoxic agents, anti-mitotic agents, anti-angiogenic agents, targeted therapies and monoclonal anti-bodies (unconjugated or conjugated with cytotoxics). Projects are presented from the most advanced to the least advanced stage of development.

The main compounds currently in Phase II or III clinical development in the Oncology field are:


        Three further projects (semuloparin, ombrabulin and clofarabine) that were under regulatory review and in Phase III respectively in 2012, have experienced the following changes:


e)    Other Prescription Products

        Lovenox® (enoxaparin sodium) is available in over 100 countries. It has been used to treat over 350 million patients since its launch.

        Lovenox® has the broadest range of indications amongst low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). A comprehensive clinical development plan has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of Lovenox® in the prevention and treatment of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) and in the management of the full spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

        In VTE management, Lovenox® is continuing to grow as a treatment for the prevention of VTE, mainly in acutely ill patients not undergoing surgery.

        Two competing generics of enoxaparin are available in the U.S. No biosimilar has been approved in the European Union. An authorized generic is available in the U.S. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Impacts from generic competition".

        In 2012, Lovenox® was the leading anti-thrombotic in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (source: IMS 2012 sales).

        Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate), a platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist with a rapid onset of action that selectively inhibits platelet aggregation induced by ADP, is indicated for long-termthe prevention of


atherothrombotic events in patients with a history of recent myocardial infarction, recent ischemic stroke or established peripheral arterial disease. Plavix® is indicated for the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis regardless of the location of the arteries initially affected (heart, brain, lower limbs). Plavix® is now also indicated for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with and without ST segment elevation in combination with ASA.

acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Plavix® is also available in a 300 mg tablet that reinforces early use by simplifying its approved loading dose administration in patients with ACS.

        In 2011, on the basis of the ACTIVE A study results (7,554 patients), the EMA granted marketing authorization for Plavix® is also indicated in combination with ASA for the prevention of atherothrombotic and thromboembolic events in Atrial Fibrillation, including stroke, in patients with atrial fibrillation who have at least one risk factor for vascular events, are not suitable for treatment with Vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and have a low bleeding risk.stroke.

        CoPlavix® / DuoPlavin®, a fixed dose combination of clopidogrel bisulfate and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA),ASA, is indicated for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome who are already taking both clopidogrel and ASA.

        The marketingFor additional information on the commercialization of Plavix® / CoPlavix® / DuoPlavin® is organized through our alliance with BMS which was restructured in 2012 with effect on January 1, 2013 (seethese products, see "Item 5 — Financial Presentation of Alliances — Alliance Arrangements with Bristol-Myers Squibb"). Sales of Plavix® in Japan are outside the scope of our alliance with BMS. Exclusivity for Plavix® in the U.S. expired on May 17, 2012 and aA number of generics have been launched. Previously, generics had also been launched in Europe.Europe, the United States and other markets.

        Generics are expected to launch in 2015 in Japan.

        Plavix® is the leading anti-platelet in the Chinese market.

        The main countries contributing to sales of Plavix® / Iscover® in 2014 were Japan and Japanese markets (source: IMS 2012 sales)China.

Lovenox® / Clexane®

        Lovenox® (enoxaparin sodium) has been used to treat almost 500 million patients in more than 100 countries since its launch and is registered for a wider range of clinical indications than any other low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Its comprehensive clinical dossier has demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit ratio, notably in the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism and in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. In the prevention of venous thromboembolism, the use of Lovenox® continues to grow, particularly in the area of prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients hospitalized for an acute medical condition. In the United States, three enoxaparin generics have been approved as well as Sanofi's own Lovenox® generic. No biosimilar of Lovenox has been authorized in the European Union yet. In 2014, Lovenox® was the leading injectable anti-thrombotic in all European countries.

        Aprovel® (irbesartan) is an anti-hypertensive belonging to the class of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. These highly effective and well tolerated antagonists act by blocking the effect of angiotensin II, the hormone responsible for blood vessel contraction, thereby enabling blood pressure to return to normal. In addition to Aprovel®/Avapro®/Karvea®, we also market CoAprovel®/Avalide®/Karvezide®, a fixed dose combination of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), a diuretic that increases the excretion of water and sodium by the kidneys and provides an additional blood pressure lowering effect. These products achieve control of blood pressure in over 80% of patients, with a very good safety profile.


Table of Contents

        Aprovel® and CoAprovel® tablets are available in a wide range of dosages to fit the needs of patients with different levels of hypertension severity.

        Aprovel® is indicated as a first-linefirst line treatment for hypertension and for the treatment of nephropathy in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. CoAprovel® is indicated in patients whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled with a monotherapy, but also as initial therapy in patients at high risk or with markedly high baseline BP or who are likely to need multiple drugs to achieve their blood pressure goals (in the United States only).goals.

        Aprovel® and CoAprovel® are marketed in more than 80 countries. The marketingFor additional information on the commercialization of Aprovel® and CoAprovel® is organized through an alliance with BMS which was restructured in 2012 (seethis product, see "Item 5 — Financial Presentation of Alliances — Alliance Arrangements with Bristol-Myers Squibb" below). In Japan, the product is licensed/sub-licensedlicensed to Shionogi Co. Ltd and BMS KK. BMS KK has sublicensed the agreement to Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. Ltd, respectively. Aprovel® U.S. market exclusivity expired in March 2012 and a number of generic versions have been launched.


Multaq®

        Multaq® (dronedarone) is the most extensively studied anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and has demonstrated a unique cardiovascular (CV) outcome benefit in the ATHENA study in addition to effective rhythm control in the EURIDIS and ADONIS studies.

        Multaq® is a multichannel blocker with both rhythm (prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrences) and rate (decrease of ventricular rate) controlling properties and additional effects (anti-hypertensive, vasodilatory). It is the first and only anti-arrhythmic drug to have shown a significant reduction in cardiovascular hospitalization and death in patients with paroxysmal and persistent Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter .

        Following reports in January 2011 of hepatocellular liver injury and hepatic failure in patients receiving Multaq®, including two post-marketing reports of acute hepatic failure requiring transplantation, Sanofi has collaborated with health authorities agencies to update prescribing information and include liver function monitoring. Sanofi coordinated the implementation of the updated label by disseminating proactively relevant educational materials to prescribers.

        The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) confirmed in September 2011 that the benefits of Multaq® continue to outweigh the risks with a revised indication for the treatment of a limited, newly defined population: Multaq® is indicated for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful cardioversion in adult clinically stable patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Due to its safety profile, Multaq® should only be prescribed after alternative treatment options have been considered and should not be given to patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or to patients with current or previous episodes of heart failure.

        The FDA approved a label update in December 2011 to ensure its use in the appropriate patient population, specifically in patients in sinus rhythm with history of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), and also reinforcing warnings and precautions for use.

        In Europe, updated guidelines were issued by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) confirming Multaq®'s crucial role in the AF treatment armamentarium as a first line option in a broad range of patients. Multaq® is the only recommended first line AAD for AF patients with hypertensive heart disease and left ventricular hypertrophy. Multaq® is still the only AAD recommended in non-permanent AF with CV risk factors to reduce CV hospitalization.LTD.

        The main countries contributing to Multaq® sales of Aprovel® / Avapro® / Karvea® in 20122014 were the U.S., GermanyChina and Italy.Japan.

        Renagel® (sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate) are oral phosphate binders used by chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on dialysis as well as late-stagelate stage CKD patients in Europe to treat a condition called hyperphosphatemia, or elevated phosphorus levels, which is associated with heart and bone disease. Renvela® is a second generation, buffered phosphate binder.

        In the United States, there are an estimated 395,000 dialysis patients, approximately 90% of whom receive a phosphate binder. There are an estimated 350,000 dialysis patients in the EUEuropean Union and 65,000 in Brazil. In the EU,European Union, Renvela® is also approved to treat CKD patients not on dialysis.

        We market Renagel® and Renvela® directly to nephrologists through Sanofi's employee sales force and distribute these products through wholesalers and distributors.are marketed in more than 80 countries. In Japan and several Pacific Rim countries, Renagel® is marketed by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd and its sublicensee, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.

        InAs of December 15, 2014, there have been no approvals of generics in the United States, Genzyme and generic manufacturers have settled pending litigation with regardStates. However, as part of an amendment to the production and saleANDA settlement, Sanofi granted Impax a license to sell a specific allotment of bottles of an authorized generic formulationsversion of Renvela® tablets on April 16, 2014. This amendment did not change Sanofi's prior settlement agreement with Impax to sell generic versions of two other sevelamer products, Renvela® for oral suspension and Renagel®. According, which must obtain FDA ANDA approval in order to the terms of the settlements, the first-filer for each product can enter the U.S. market on March 16, 2014 and second-filers can enter the market on September 16, 2014, or earlier under certain circumstances, pending approval of their generic application.launch.


        The top fivemain countries contributing to the sales of Renagel® and Renvela® in 20122014 were the U.S.,United States, France, Italy, France,Brazil and the UK,United Kingdom.

Allegra® / Telfast®

        Allegra® (fexofenadine hydrochloride) is a long-lasting (12- and Brazil.

        Synvisc® and Synvisc-One® (hylan G-F 20) are viscosupplements used to treat pain associated with osteoarthritis of certain joints. Synvisc is indicated24-hour) non-sedating prescription anti-histamine for the treatment of pain associatedseasonal allergic rhinitis (hay fever) and uncomplicated hives. It offers patients significant relief from allergy symptoms without causing drowsiness.

        We also market Allegra-D® 12 Hour and Allegra-D® 24 Hour, anti-histamine/decongestant combination products with osteoarthritisan extended-release decongestant for effective non-drowsy relief of the knee, hip, ankle, and shoulder jointseasonal allergy symptoms, including nasal congestion. Generics of most forms of Allegra® / Tefast® have been approved in countries that have adopted CE marking, and for pain due to knee osteoarthritis inour major markets.

        In the United States. CurrentlyStates, the Allegra® family moved to over-the- counter (OTC) use in adults and children two years of age and older in 2011. Allegra® was also launched on the OTC market in Japan in November 2012, though it also remains available on prescription (see "— f) Consumer Health Care" below).

        Allegra® / Telfast® is marketed in approximately 80 countries. The largest market for prescriptions of Allegra® is Japan, where competing generics entered the market in early 2013 (for more information see "Item 8 Financial Information — A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information — Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings").

        The main viscosupplementation marketcountry contributing to Allegra® / Telfast® sales in 2014 was Japan.


Table of Contents

Depakine®

        Depakine® (sodium valproate) is a broad-spectrum anti-epileptic drug that has been prescribed for more than 40 years. Numerous clinical trials as well as many years of experience have demonstrated its efficacy for most forms of epilepsy and it is generally well-tolerated. Consequently, Depakine® remains the reference treatment for epilepsy throughout the world.

        Depakine® is also a mood stabilizer, registered in many countries in the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritismanic episodes within the scope of bipolar disorder and in the prevention of mood relapses and recurrences.

        Sanofi produces a wide range of Depakine® formulations, meeting the specific requirements of the knee.various types of patients: syrup, oral solution, injection, enteric tablet, Depakine® Chrono (a sustained release tablet) and Depakine® Chronosphere (a granule formulation packaged in sachets, a form particularly suitable for children, the elderly and adults with difficulties swallowing).

        Synvisc®Depakine® is a triple-injection productregistered in 130 countries and Synvisc-One® a single-injection product. Bothmarketed in 124 countries. Sodium valproate generics are administered directly into the intra-articular space of the joint to temporarily restore osteoarthritis synovial fluid.available in most markets.

        Synvisc® and Synvisc-One® are primarily marketed through Sanofi's employee sales force directly to physicians, hospitals, and pharmacies, while in some countries the products are still promoted by independent distributors.

        In 2012, Sanofi initiated a pivotal clinical trial of Synvisc-One® for treatment of pain associated with mild to moderate primary osteoarthritis of the hip. The trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 350 patients recruited from 26 sites in the United States.

        In 2012, the top fivemain countries contributing to Synvisc®net sales of Depakine® in 2014 were China, the United Kingdom and Synvisc-One® sales were the U.S., Canada, France, Mexico and Germany.Italy.

        At the end of 2012, Sanofi launched LeGoo®, a gel for temporary endovascular occlusion of blood vessels during surgical procedures in the U.S. LeGoo® is an innovative technology that is expected to enhance the Sanofi Biosurgery portfolio.

        Stilnox® (zolpidem tartrate) is indicated in the short-term treatment of insomnia. Stilnox® rapidly induces sleep that is qualitatively close to natural sleep and devoid of certain side effects that are characteristic of the benzodiazepine class as a whole. Its action lasts for a minimum of six hours, and it is generally well tolerated, allowing the patient to awaken with a reduced risk of impaired attention, decreased alertness or memory lapses throughout the day.

        Stilnox® is marketed in over 100 countries. It is available under the brand name Ambien® / Ambien®CR in the United States and Myslee® in Japan, where it is co-promoted jointly with Astellas.

Stilnox® and Ambien CR® are subject to generic competition in most markets, including the United States and Europe. In Japan, generics of Myslee® entered the market in June 2012.

        Allegra® (fexofenadine hydrochloride)Synvisc® and Synvisc-One® (hylan G-F 20) are viscosupplements used to treat pain associated with osteoarthritis. Synvisc is a long-lasting (12- and 24-hour) non-sedating prescription anti-histamineindicated for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (hay fever)pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, hip, ankle, and shoulder joint in countries that have adopted CE marking, and for pain due to knee osteoarthritis in the United States. Synvisc-One® is approved for use in patients with OA of the knee in United States and countries that require CE marking. Currently the main viscosupplementation market is for the treatment of uncomplicated hives. It offers patients significant relief from allergy symptoms without causing drowsiness.pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee.

        We also market Allegra-D® 12 HourSynvisc® is a triple-injection product and Allegra-D® 24 Hour, anti-histamine/decongestant combination products with an extended-release decongestant for effective non-drowsy reliefSynvisc-One® a single-injection product. Both are administered directly into the intra-articular space of seasonal allergy symptoms, including nasal congestion. Generics of most forms of Allegra®/Tefast® have been approved in our major markets.the joint to temporarily restore osteoarthritis synovial fluid.


        In 2014, the main countries contributing to Synvisc® and Synvisc One® sales were the United States, the Allegra® family moved to over-the-counter (OTC) use in adultsMexico, France, Canada, Germany and children two years of age and older in 2011. AllegraBrazil.

® was also launched on the OTC market in Japan in November 2012, though it also remains available on prescription (see "— Consumer Health Care" below).Multaq®

        Allegra®/Telfast®Multaq® (dronedarone) is marketedthe most extensively studied anti arrhythmic drug in approximately 80 countries. The largest market for prescriptionsatrial fibrillation (AF) and has demonstrated a unique cardiovascular (CV) outcome benefit in the ATHENA study in addition to effective rhythm control in the EURIDIS and ADONIS studies which was confirmed in real-world investigations.


Table of Allegra® is Japan, where competing generics entered the market in early 2013 (for more information see "Item 8 Financial Information — A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information — Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings").

        Depakine® (sodium valproate)Multaq® is a broad-spectrum anti-epileptic that has been prescribed for more than 40 years. Numerous clinical trialsmultichannel blocker with both rhythm (prevention of AF recurrences) and long yearsrate (decrease of experienceventricular rate) controlling properties and additional effects (anti-hypertensive, vasodilatory). It is the first and only anti arrhythmic drug to have shown that ita significant reduction in CV hospitalization and death in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF.

        The main countries contributing to Multaq® sales in 2014 were the United States, Germany and Italy.

Actonel®

        Actonel® (risedronate sodium) is effectivea biphosphonate used for all types of epileptic seizures and epileptic syndromes, and is generally well tolerated. Consequently, Depakine® remains a reference treatment for epilepsy worldwide.

        Depakine® is also a mood stabilizer, registered in the treatment of manic episodes associatedosteoporosis and Paget's disease. For additional information on the commercialization of this product, see "Item 5 — Financial presentation of Alliances — Alliance Arrangements with bipolar disorder and, in numerous countries, in the prevention of mood episodes.Warner Chilcott".

Auvi-Q®

        We provide a wide range of formulations of Depakine® enabling it to be adapted to most types of patients: syrup, oral solution, injection, enteric-coated tablets, Depakine® Chrono (a sustained release formulation in tablets) and Depakine® Chronosphere (sustained release formulation of Depakine® packaged in stick packs, facilitating its use by children, the elderly and adults with difficulties swallowing).

        Depakine® is marketed in over 100 countries, and is generally subject to generic competition.

        At the end of January 2013, Sanofi launched Auvi-Q™Auvi-Q® (epinephrine injection, USP) in the U.S. Auvi-Q™, is the first-and-only epinephrine auto-injector with audio and visual cues that talk you through the injection process. Auvi-Q® is for the emergency treatment of life-threatening allergic reactions in people who are at risk for or have a history of anaphylaxis. Up to six million Americans may be at risk forof anaphylaxis, although the precise incidence is unknown and likely underreported.

        Sanofi US licensed the North American commercialization rights to Auvi-Q™Auvi-Q® from Intelliject,Inc.

        In the Metabolic field:

        In the Ophthalmology field:

        Sanofi started establishing its footprint in ophthalmology through the acquisition of Fovea, a French ophthalmology specialist (in October 2009), the ophthalmology assets of Genzyme (acquired in 2011), and a collaboration agreement with Oxford BioMedica (April 2009) that led to the exercise of two opt-in options in August 2012.Canada.

        One project in Phase II (FOV2304 — eye-drop formulation of a bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist evaluated in diabetic macular edema) was discontinued in October 2012, and the review of Phase IIb results forFOV-1101 (eye-drop fixed dose combination of prednisolone acetate and cyclosporine A for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis) led to a reassessment of the commercial prospects for this compound and a decision to continue development under a sublicense agreement with an as yet unidentified third party.


        In the Thrombosis and Cardiovascular field:

        In the Internal Medicine field:

        Consumer Health Care is aone of the key platforms in Sanofi's global growth platform identified in our broader strategy. In 2012, we recorded CHC2014, our Consumer Health Care sales of €3,008reached €3.337 million, an increase of 9.9%. Nearly half11.1% (or 16.5% at constant exchange rates); nearly 53% of our CHCthese sales were generated in emerging markets, 22%Emerging Markets, 20% in Western Europe and 21% in the United States.

        In March 2011,Our Consumer Health Care activities were consolidated within the Allegra® familyGlobal Consumer Health Care Division at the end of allergy medication2013. During 2014, this new division became operational, focusing on meeting consumer needs in terms of health and well-being by mobilizing:

        We are the third largest player in the U.S.global consumer healthcare market, and the fastest growing company in this sector.

        The sustained growth of our Consumer Health Care business is based on three complementary development priorities:


Table of Contents

        Pertussis (whooping cough) affects children,Many countries now recommend pertussis immunization for adolescents and adults. Resurgence, in particular in the U.S. and other parts of the world,These recommendations, combined with increasedimmunization awareness of the dangers of vaccine-preventable diseases in general, hasinitiatives, have led to higher sales of this product groupincreased pertussis vaccination in recent years.

        Adacel®, the first trivalent adolescent and adult booster offering protection against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, was licensed and launched in the United StatesU.S. in 2005. Since its launch in the U.S., more than 100 million doses of Adacel® have been sold. This vaccine plays an important role in efforts to better control pertussis, by preventing the disease in adolescents and adults and by breaking the cycle of transmission to infants too young to bewho are immunized or only partially vaccinated. Adacel® is now registered in more than 5060 countries.


Table of Contents

        Quadracel®,Repevax® (also marketed under the trademark Adacel-Polio®) is a quadrivalent boostercombination vaccine (fifth dose) including diphtheria, tetanus, acellularthat provides the same benefits as Adacel® along with offering protection against polio. Repevax® is useful in markets that recommend adolescent and/or adult immunizations to protect against both pertussis and IPV,polio. This vaccine is being developed for the U.S. market. It would allow a child to complete the entire childhood series with the fewest doses possible. It is currentlylicensed in Phase III trials.more than 30 countries worldwide.

        Sanofi Pasteur is at the forefront of the development of vaccines to prevent bacterial meningitis. In 2014, Sanofi Pasteur celebrated 40 years of providing vaccines protecting against meningitis. In 2005, Sanofi Pasteur introduced Menactra®, the first quadrivalent conjugate quadrivalent vaccine against meningococcal meningitis, which is considered by many as the deadliest form of meningitis in the world. By AprilIn 2011, the FDA had granted Sanofi Pasteur a license to expand the indication of Menactra® to children as young as 9nine months of age. Menactra® is now indicated for people aged 9nine months through 55 years in the United States,U.S., Canada, Saudi Arabia and numerous other countries in Latin America, the Middle East and Asia Pacific regions.

        Meningitis A, C, Y, W-135 conj. Second Generation is a project targeting a second generation meningococcal vaccine that uses an alternative conjugation technology. In 2011, interim Phase II clinical trial results were obtained and indicated that the product is sufficiently immunogenic for further development in infants.

        Sanofi Pasteur provides a wide range of travel and endemic vaccines including hepatitis A, typhoid, rabies,cholera, yellow fever, choleraand Japanese encephalitis, as well as rabies vaccines and anti-venoms.immunoglobulins. These vaccines and immunoglobulins are used in endemic settings in the developing


world and are the basisfoundation for important partnerships with governments and organizations such as UNICEF. They are also used by thetravelers and military personnel in industrialized countries and travelers toin endemic areas. AsSanofi Pasteur is the global leader in most of the majority of theseworld's travel and endemic vaccine markets, Sanofi Pasteur's Travel/Endemics activity has demonstrated stable growth.markets.

        IMOJEV™In 2009, Shantha launched Shanchol™, the first oral cholera vaccine produced in India for use in children and adults. Shanchol™ received WHO prequalification in 2011.

        IMOJEV®, a Japanese encephalitis vaccine, is also in development. The Australian healthcare authorities granted approval of the latest variations of the IMOJEV™ file on September 24, 2012 for individuals aged 12 monthsmost recent addition to our travel and over, followed by the Thai Foodendemic vaccines portfolio and Drug Administration on November 14, 2012. IMOJEV™ has now beenwas successfully launched in these twoAustralia and Thailand in 2012. In 2014, IMOJEV® obtained an extension of indication for use in children from nine months of age and obtained WHO prequalification, which provides access to the products in low-income countries. IMOJEV® is being progressively rolled out in endemic countries throughout Asia.

f)     Other Products

        A new generation Vero serum-free vaccine (VerorabVax™) will provideGrowth in other products is mainly driven by VaxServe, a worldwide, single rabies vaccine asleading specialty distributor in the U.S. market. VaxServe, a replacementSanofi Pasteur company, offers a broad portfolio of products from Sanofi Pasteur and other manufacturers and is a strategic asset that enables us to be closer to our current rabies vaccine offerings. Results from the 2009 Phase II clinical trial demonstrated non-inferiority of VRVg versus Verorab® in pre-exposure prophylaxis. VRVg was approved in France as a line extension of VeroRab in January 2011customers and clinical development is finalized in China with completion of Phase III confirming non-inferiority vs. Verorab® in simulated post-exposure prophylaxis.better serve their needs.

        In December 2009, Shantha launched ShanCholTM, India's first oral vaccine to protect against cholera in children and adults. ShanChol™ was World Health Organization pre-qualified in 2011 and more than 1 million doses of ShanCholTM were sold worldwide in 2012.

        Sanofi Pasteur acquired Topaz Pharmaceuticals in October 2011. The integration of Topaz was completed in 2012. The FDA licensed Sklice® (ivermectin) lotion, 0.5%, on February 7, 2012 as a one-time treatment for head lice in persons aged 6 months and older, and commercial launch commenced in July 2012.

B.4 Animal Health: Merial

        Our animal healthAnimal Health activity is carried out throughby Merial, one of the world's leading animal healthcare companies (source: Vetnosis),companies. This company is dedicated to the research, development, manufacture and deliverymarketing of innovative pharmaceuticalspharmaceutical products and vaccines used by veterinarians, farmers and pet owners. It providesMerial offers a comprehensivefull range of products to enhance the health, well-being and performance of a wide range of animals, both production and companion animals. Its net sales for 2012 amounted to €2,179 million.

companion. Merial became Sanofi's dedicated animal healthAnimal Health division following the joint statement issuedannouncement by Merck & Co. Inc. and Sanofi in March 2011 announcingof the end of their agreement to create a new animal health joint venture by combining their respective animal health segments. Consequently all Merial financials are consolidated in Group reports. Seeactivities (see Note D.2.D.2 to ourthe consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.statements).

        The animal health product range comprisesof veterinary products covers four majormain segments: parasiticides, anti-infectious drugs, other pharmaceutical productspharmaceuticals (such as anti-inflammatory agents, anti-ulcerousanti-ulcer agents, etc.) and vaccines. Merial's top-selling products includeare: Frontline®, a topical anti-parasitic flea and tick brand for dogs and cats, the highest selling veterinary product in the world (source: Vetnosis);world; Heartgard®, a parasiticide for control of heartworm in companion animals; Nexgard®, an oral anti-parasitic for the treatment and prevention of fleas and ticks in dogs; Ivomec®, a parasiticide for the control of internal and external parasites in livestock; Vaxxitek®, a high-technology vector vaccine, protectsprotecting chickens against infectious bursal disease (IBD) and Marek's disease; Previcox®, a highly selective anti-inflammatory/COX-2 inhibitor for relief of pain and control of inflammation in dogs; Eprinex®, a parasiticide for use in cattle;production animals; and Circovac®, a PCV2 (porcine circovirus type 2) vaccine for swine.vaccine. Merial plays a keyan important role in the veterinary public health activities of governments around the world. ItMerial is the world leader in vaccines for Foot-and-Mouth disease, (FMD), rabies and bluetongue (BTV) (source: Vetnosis).bluetongue.


Table of Contents

        Merial's net sales amounted to €2,076 million in 2014. The compound patent protecting fipronil,performance in 2014 was boosted by the active ingredientsuccessful launch of Frontline®, expired in 2009 in Japan and in some European countries, including France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, and in August 2010Nexgard® which, in the United States. In those markets wherefirst year of launch, has become one of the fipronil compound patent has expired, Frontline®15 top-selling animal health products are generally still protected through formulation patents (directed to combinations) which expire at the latest in 2017 in Europe (August 2016 in the United States).world, as well as the launch of Broadline® in Europe. Another major factor for the Companion Animal franchise is the performance of the Frontline® is also protected by a method of use patentbrand both in the United States and Europe, supported by additional targeted investment and a favorable season.

        Growth for Merial's Production Animal franchise is in line with that of the European Patent area (Germany, France, Italymarket. Despite the avian flu pandemic in Asia and increased competition, the Avian franchise is growing. The Ruminants Franchise meanwhile experienced solid growth, boosted by emerging market countries and the United Kingdom), expiring March 2018. As for human


pharmaceutical products, patent protection for animal pharmaceutical products extendssuccess of LongRange (eprinomectin — injectable anti-parasitic against internal and external parasites in most cases for 20 years from the filing date of the priority application.

        As regards regulatory exclusivity, the position of veterinary medicinal products in Europe is similar to that of human pharmaceutical products: eight-year data exclusivity and ten-year market exclusivity. In the United States, there is ten-year data exclusivity for products approved by the Environmental Protection Agency and an additional five years during which a generic applicant has to compensate the originator if it cites the originator's data. For FDA approved veterinary medicinal products, a regulatory exclusivity period of five years is granted for a new chemical entity and three years for a previously-approved active ingredient. No data exclusivity exists at present for veterinary vaccinescattle) in the United States.

        In April 2012, Merial acquired Newport Laboratories (Newport)2014, Merial's range of anti-parasitic products for companion animals was extended with:

        On January 19, 2015, the European Commission approved NexGard® Spectra™ (afoxolaner and milbemycin oxime). This product further strengthens Merial's companion animal anti-parasitic arsenal and is available only on prescription. This new chewable tablet, built on the success of NexGard® against fleas and ticks, offers additional protection against heartworm and treats infections caused by intestinal worms in dogs.

        Targeted acquisitions have also been made. In the Companion Animal segment, Merial has secured the supply of Heartgard® by acquiring the Barceloneta site in Puerto Rico from Merck & Co. Inc. and will make use of the site's expertise in chewables manufacturing technology. In the Production Animal segment, Merial has acquired Bayer's equine portfolio, consisting of Legend®/Hyonate™ (hyaluronate sodium) and Marquis® (ponazuril). Legend®/Hyonate® is an injectable solution that treats noninfectious joint dysfunction in horses, and Marquis Antiprotozoal Oral Paste is the first FDA-approved treatment for equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM), a leaderdisease that affects the central nervous system in autogenous vaccines with a focus on swine and bovine production markets.

        On December 20, 2012, Merial entered into a binding agreement to acquire the animal health division of the Indian company Dosch Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, creating a market entry for Merial in that country's strategically important and growing animal health sector. The agreement is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to finalize sometime in the first half of 2013.

        The 2012 performance of the companion animals franchise was driven by the growth of pet vaccines worldwide and by the performance of Heartgard® in the U.S. For production animals, the performance was mainly driven by the avian segment (notably Vaxxitek®) and the swine segment, thanks to Circovac® sales and the acquisition of Newport.horses.

        Merial's majorprincipal markets are the United States, France, Brazil, Italy, the United Kingdom, Germany, China, Australia, Germany, Japan, Spain China, and Canada. Emerging Markets contributed double digitMature markets represent 71% of Merial's total net sales with growth in 2012, and now account for 26.6% of total Merial sales.

        Merial operates through a network of 17 production sites, with major sites located in France, the United States, Brazil and China. The major R&D sites are located in France and in the United States. Merial employs approximately 6,060 people worldwide (see Item 4D "Property, Plant & Equipment")more than 7%.

B.5. Global Research & Development

        The mission of Sanofi's Global Research & DevelopmentR&D organization is to discover and develop therapies that prevent, treat andor cure diseases. Our day-to-day commitment is to respond to patients' real needs and to provide them with adapted therapeutic solutions in order to improve their well-being and extend their life.lives.

        To meet these challenges, R&D has evolved towards an integrateda global organization encompassingintegrating all R&D activities from drug discovery to medical affairs across three major segments: Pharmaceuticals, Vaccines, and Animal Health. Our therapeutic areas encompass a wide range of therapeutic areasdiseases that represent a large and growing burden on populations and healthcare systems, in line with global trends and the most pressing health needs.

        These include:


diseases.

        To carry out our mission, meet these challenges and maximize our impact, we are strivingstrive to bring innovation to patients and to build a pipeline of high value projects. Our approach is neutral to the source of innovation, whether it comes from internal research or external innovation.

        Medical value, scientific quality and operational effectiveness are the three drivers that underpin our strategy. We focus on projects that have the potential to provide the best medical value differential to patients and payers and to reduce healthcare costs for society.


Table of Contents

        By using a translational medicine approach, ensuring that research hypotheses are validated in humans as early as possible, we can translate basic research findings into medical practice more quickly and efficiently and improve the scientific quality of our projects. The open innovation and large collaboration processes applied worldwide helped us to deliver the best and most innovative solutions for patients. By implementing new operating models to ensure optimal progress on our projects, especially during clinical development phases, we will improve our operational effectiveness and deliver the right therapeutic solutions to patients more quickly.

B.5.1. Research & Development Organization

        Over recent years, we have moved from a pure pharmaceutical R&D organization to a global and integrated R&D organization where forces are combined to meet a diversity of health needs. Our R&D activities are organized into three major segments:


        We are constantly adapting ourOur R&D approach, combining global and local action, leveraging local innovative research ecosystems and global high quality development capabilitiesoperations are concentrated in order to achieve the greatest possible impact.

        We are creating geographically-focused integrated research innovation centers also called "hubs" in four areas:4 major hubs: North America, Germany, France and Asia. InWithin these hubs, a regional leadership ensures local resource optimization and effective engagement within the Boston area (United States), which has a high concentration of universities and innovative biotechnology companies, our R&D has been reorganized to support the increasing presence of the Group.ecosystems.

B.5.2. Pharmaceuticals

        Our research and development projects are respectively managed by a Research Working Group (RWG) and a Development Working Group (DWG). These working groups are responsible for the oversight of all major aspects of the research and development portfolios respectively. They drive project prioritization and approval of major stage-gate transitions as well as project terminations. The RWG is temporarily chaired by a Research transition group and the DWG is chaired by the Development Deputy. Both groups include senior members of Sanofi Global R&D is now organized to promote the best use of our resources within the local ecosystem. Our network-based organization is open to external opportunities, and enables us to more effectively capitalize on innovationas well as experts from a wide rangevariety of sources.fields necessary for informed decision making.

        As in 2011,In addition for all major late stage projects, integrated oversight is provided by an Integrated Development Council (IDC) built jointly by R&D again conducted a rigorous and comprehensive portfolio review.Commercial Operations. The IDC includes senior representatives from R&D, Commercial Operations and Industrial Affairs, and is responsible for reviewing and approving project strategies, major phase transitions (phase III, filing, major label modifications), and assessing the launch readiness (pricing, reimbursement, marketing, medical plans). The IDC also reviews major deviations from approved strategies and plans, including registration issues and project discontinuation. The Executive Committee endorses decisions made by IDC.

        Projects wereare assessed using two key criteria which allow management to rapidly understand how the portfolio performsis performing in terms of innovation, unmet medical needs, risk and value. The two key criteria include:value:

        The clinical portfolio as of the date of filing of this annual report is the result of decisions taken during these reviews, plus compounds entering the portfolio from the discovery phase or from third parties via acquisition, collaboration or alliances.

        As described at "Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business — Our research and development efforts may not succeed in adequately renewing our product portfolio and — Risks Relating to the Group Structure and Strategy — We may fail to adequately renewsuccessfully identify external business opportunities or realize the anticipated benefits from our product portfolio whether through our own research and development or through acquisitions and strategic alliances."investments" our product development efforts are subject to the risks and uncertainties inherent in any new product development program.


Table of Contents

        The clinical portfolio for new medical entitiesproducts can be summarized as follows:follows (as of February 5, 2015)


Phase I
Phase II
Phase III /registration
 

Phase IPhase IIPhase III / registration

Diabetes Solutions

SAR425899   lixisenatide(AVE0010)
Cardiovascular diseasesSAR164653SAR236553
GZ402669mipomersen
SAR126119otamixaban(XRP0673)
SAR127963Lyxumia® (lixisenatide)
Lixilan® (lixisenatide / insulin glargine)
Toujeo® (glargine U300)
SAR342434 (insulin lispro)
  
 

Oncology

 SAR125844
SAR245408
iniparib(BSI-201)
SAR153192
SAR405838
SAR408701
SAR566658
 SAR245409SAR302503
SAR260301SAR256212
SAR307746
SAR3419
GZ402674
SAR405838
SAR566658

SAR650984
    
 

Immune MediatedCardiovascular diseases

SAR100842SAR156597alemtuzumab
(including MS)SAR113244SAR339658teriflunomide
  SAR252067fresolumimab dupilumabsarilumab(SAR153191)
Age related degenerativeSAR228810SAR110894
diseasesSAR391786SAR113945Praluent® (alirocumab)  
 
SAR399063

Immune Mediated diseases (including Multiple Sclerosis)

 SAR292833GZ402668
SAR113244
SAR252067
SAR156597
vatelizumab
sarilumab
dupilumab
  
 

Age Related Degenerative Diseases

 SAR404460SAR228810SAR391786    
 

Infectious Diseasesdiseases

   ferroquine
SAR97276
SAR279356
Rare DiseasesGZ402665eliglustat tartrate
GZ402671
GZ404477 (combo OZ439)    
 

OphtalmologyRare diseases

 GZ402663GZ402665
GZ402666
 FOV1101GZ402671patisiran (SAR438027)
revusiran (SAR438714)
  
 

Ophthalmology

 StarGen™sarilumab (uveitis)    

 UhsStat™
GZ402663
  
RetinoStat®    
 

        Phase I studies are the first studies performed in humans, inwho are mainly healthy volunteers. Their main objective is to assess the tolerability, the pharmacokinetic profile (the way the product is distributed and metabolized in the body and the manner by which it is eliminated) and where possible the pharmacodynamic profiles of the new drug (i.e. how the product may react on some receptors).

        Phase II studies are early controlled studies in a limited number of patients under closely monitored conditions to show efficacy and short-term safety and to determine the dose and regimen for Phase III studies.

        Phase III studies have the primary objective of demonstrating or confirming the therapeutic benefit and the safety of the new drug, in the intended indication and population. They are madedesigned to provide an adequate basis for registration.

        Our Phase II & III compounds are describeda)    Diabetes Solutions

Lyxumia® (Lixisenatide) is already registered in the E.U. and many other countries outside the U.S. and is presented in the section "— Pharmaceutical Products —B.2. Main Pharmaceutical Products" above. A table summarizing selected key facts concerning our late stage experimental pharmaceutical products follows, at the end of this section.)

        TheSanofi Diabetes maintains a significant network of R&D collaborations with world leading academic institutions, was significantly extended in 2012. A collaboration with the Charité in Berlin that began in 2010 was further extended to include Diabetes as an additional focus. In addition we entered into a research alliance with the Helmholtz Zentrum in Munich, and a new collaborationincluding collaborations with the Joslin Diabetes Center (affiliate(an affiliate of Harvard Medical School) was formed, the Charite in Berlin and the Helmholtz Zentrum in Munich. We also have collaborations with Gentofte Hospital (Copenhagen), and Gubra (a Danish biotech company specialized in gut hormone R&D). Sanofi and JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation) continue to promotejointly fund selected innovation projects in the developmentfield of new medicinestype 1 diabetes research.

        Sanofi and Medtronic have mutually agreed not to pursue the negotiations for the treatmenta business partnership for which a non-binding memorandum of understanding had been signed in June 2014. Sanofi remains strongly committed to bringing integrated care to people with diabetes, and related disorders.will continue to establish partnerships with a view to creating new solutions to improve patient outcomes.

b)    Oncology

        In 2012, we established further collaborations with other companies, universities and institutes to investigate novel oncology agents with partners including the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in the United States and the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR) in France.


Table of Contents

    Pacific, withSAR125844 administered intravenously every week. Both studies include a dose escalation part followed by an expansion cohort focused on MET driven solid tumors. Promising efficacy and safety data have been reported from Phase I, with long tumor responses in patients with MET amplified Non-small cell lung cancer (ASCO, 2014). The start of the Phase II program is planned in 2015.

    SAR245408 (XL147) was in-licensed from Exelixis, Inc. and is being developed by Sanofi. This oral phosphoinositide- 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor is currently under evaluation in a Phase I study of the new formulation (Polymorphic Form E Tablet).

    SAR405838 is a potent inhibitor of the HDM2/P53 interaction. The inactivation of the p53 function is an almost universal feature of human cancer cells. P53 is the most frequently mutated gene in cancer, with ~50% of tumors disabling p53 via the acquisition of somatic mutations. In ~50% of the tumors that retain the p53 wild-type status, the p53 function is frequently disabled by HDM2;SAR405838 is aimed at intervening in this situation. The program is in Phase I with two ongoing studies.

    SAR408701 is an Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) that binds to CEACAM-5, a membrane glycoprotein originally identified as a surface marker on adenocarcinomas of the human gastrointestinal tract. The compound entered the Sanofi Phase I pipeline in 2014 with one ongoing study.

    SAR566658 is an Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) loaded with a maytansinoid derivative DM4 (huDS6-SPDB-DM4) targeting CA6. CA6 is a tumor specific epitope highly expressed on some solid tumors. The program is in Phase I with one ongoing study.

    Projects discontinued in 2014

    SAR153192 is a monoclonal antibody, directed against the Delta-Like-Ligand-4 from our alliance with Regeneron. This program has been discontinued in Phase I and the rights returned to Regeneron.

    SAR260301 targets PI3K (Phosphoinositide 3 Kinase) pathway inhibition through selective inhibition of the PI3K beta-isoform. The program, which was in Phase I, has been terminated because of the poor pharmacokinetic properties observed.

    SAR256212 (MM-121) under an exclusive global collaboration and licensing agreement, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi were co-developing SAR256212, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting ErbB3, in Breast, Lung and Ovarian Cancer. In June 2014, Sanofi returned the worldwide rights ofSAR256212 to Merrimack.

    SAR307746 is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody targets angiopoietin 2 (Ang2), issued from our alliance with Regeneron. This program (Phase I) has been discontinued and the rights returned to Regeneron.

c)    Cardiovascular diseases

    Praluent® — alirocumab (SAR236553), developed in collaboration with Regeneron: positive results from Phase III studies with alirocumab, an investigational monoclonal antibody targeting PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), were obtained in 2014.

        All nine Phase III trials of alirocumab in people with hypercholesterolemia met their primary efficacy endpoint of a greater percent reduction from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at 24 weeks compared to placebo or active comparator. The mean percent reduction in LDL-C from baseline at 24 weeks in alirocumab-treated patients was consistent with results seen in previous alirocumab trials. The nine trials were ODYSSEY LONG TERM, FH I, FH II, HIGH FH, COMBO I, COMBO II, OPTIONS I, OPTIONS II and ALTERNATIVE. All patients received alirocumab in addition to standard-of-care lipid-lowering therapy, with the exception of some patients in ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE.

        The 2,341-patient ongoing ODYSSEY LONG TERM trial evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of alirocumab compared to placebo. Both treatment groups received statins and some patients also received additional lipid-lowering therapies. The trial met its primary efficacy endpoint at 24 weeks. A pre-specified interim safety analysis was performed when all patients reached one year and approximately 25 percent of patients reached 18 months of treatment. A lower rate of adjudicated major cardiovascular events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization) was observed in the alirocumab arm compared to placebo in a post-hoc analysis (p-value of less than 0.05). The potential of alirocumab to demonstrate cardiovascular benefit is being prospectively assessed in an ongoing 18,000-patient ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial.

        Alirocumab was generally well tolerated in the nine ODYSSEY trials. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infections, which were generally balanced between treatment groups.


Table of Contents

Injection site reactions occurred more often in the alirocumab group compared to placebo. Serious adverse events and deaths were generally balanced between treatment groups as were other key adverse events including musculoskeletal, neurocognitive and liver-related events.

        The nine ODYSSEY trials, along with the previously announced MONO trial, encompass over 5,000 patients studied in double-blind trials for 24-104 weeks and will be used to support registration of alirocumab in major markets.

        In January 2015, the FDA accepted the Praluent® Biologics License application (BLA) for priority review and the EMA accepted the Praluent® Marketing Authorization Application for review in the European Union.

        The ODYSSEY clinical trial program remains ongoing. This includes three additional studies, CHOICE I, CHOICE II (both evaluating monthly doses of alirocumab) and OUTCOMES, which are expected to report primary endpoints in 2015 and beyond.

    Fresolimumab (GZ402669) — TGF-ß antagonist targetingin Phase II for the treatment of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).

d)    Immune Mediated diseases and Multiple Sclerosis

    Main products in Phase III

    Sarilumab (SAR153191), a monoclonal antibody against the Interleukin-6 Receptor (anti IL-6R mAb) derived from our alliance with Regeneron, is in Phase III in adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The SARIL-RA Phase IIIII program was launched early 2013.evaluating two doses of sarilumab is underway with one completed (SARIL-RA-MOBILITY) and six ongoing clinical studies:

    The SARIL-RA-TARGET study is investigating the effects of Sarilumab when added to DMARD (Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug) therapy in patients with active RA who are inadequate responders or intolerant to tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a) antagonists on reduction of signs and symptoms at week 24 and improvement of physical function over 24 weeks in patients;

    The SARIL-RA-ASCERTAIN study is a safety calibrator study evaluating sarilumab and tocilizumab in combination with DMARD therapy in patients with RA who are inadequate responders to, or intolerant of, TNF-alpha inhibitors over 24 weeks;

    The SARIL-RA-EXTEND study, which enrolled patients from MOBILITY and is enrolling participants by invitation from the TARGET and ASCERTAIN studies, aims to evaluate in this uncontrolled extension the long term safety and efficacy of Sarilumab on top of DMARDs in patients with active RA;

    The SARIL-RA-MONARCH is evaluating sarilumab vs adalimumab, both given as monotherapy in patients with RA. The primary endpoint is at week 24;

    The SARIL-RA-ONE is an open label trial of sarilumab monotherapy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of anti-drug antibodies at week 24;

    The SARIL-RA-EASY is a usability study comparing two devices: the auto-injector and the pre-filled syringe. Initial treatment is 12 weeks for the purpose of the primary endpoint.

    Dupilumab (SAR231893) is a monoclonal antibody against the Interleukin-4 alpha Receptor (anti IL-4R alpha) derived from our alliance with Regeneron. Dupilumab modulates signaling of both IL 4 and IL 13 pathways. It is currently being developed in several indications: atopic dermatitis in Phase III, asthma with a Phase III start planned in 2015, nasal polyposis (Positive Phase IIa proof of concept study) and eosinophilic eosophagitis in Phase II.

    Atopic Dermatitis, the Phase III program consists of:

    AAV-AADC — Gene therapy based on AAV vector targetingTwo identical 16-week monotherapy treatment trials (SOLO 1 & SOLO 2): "Monotherapy Administered to Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis". These are randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group studies to confirm the treatmentefficacy and safety of moderate to severe Parkinson's disease. Phase I is to be completed.dupilumab monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

    SAR339658A long-term treatment trial in combination with topical corticosteroids: "Study to Assess the Efficacy and Long-term Safety of dupilumab in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis". This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy and long-term safety of dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

    An open-label extension study of dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis. This is a multicenter study to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of repeat doses of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who have previously participated in controlled studies of dupilumab.

Table of Contents

      Asthma: (also known as GBR500)A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to evaluate dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma is currently ongoing and anticipated to complete in May 2015.

      Nasal Polyposis: an evaluation of dupilumab in patients with bilateral nasal polyposis and chronic symptoms of sinusitis — randomized, bouble-blind, Phase II, placebo controlled, 2 arm study- has been completed and further activities are ongoing in preparation for the next stage of development.

      Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Phase II study of dupilumab in adult patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) — randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of dupilumab in this population, is to be initiated.

    Main products in Phase II

    Vatelizumab (SAR339658), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed at the VLA-2 (Very Late Antigen 2) integrin receptor, was in-licensed from Glenmark Pharmaceuticals in May 2011. The primary target indication is inflammatory bowel disease such asrelapsing form of MS (RMS). A seamless Phase IIA/B study in remitting relapsing MS patients to assess proof of concept and dose response started in 2014; enrolment is ongoing. Its long term safety extension study is planned to start in January 2015. A Phase IIA study in patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. The compound successfully completedwas initiated in 2012. However this Phase IIIA study and its companion long term safety study were discontinued in 2010 and entered Phase IIa in 2012.

    TSU Aging portfolio

    Two compounds have completed their Phase II clinical program with data analysis ongoing:

    SAR110894 (H3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of Alzheimer's dementia).2014 due to difficult enrollment challenges. There were no safety concerns that contributed to this decision.

    SAR113945SAR156597 (IKK-ß kinase inhibitor(humanized bi-specific monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 and IL-13 cytokines) is currently in Phase IIA in the treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

    Main products in early stage

    GZ402668 (GLD52), an IgG1 monoclonal antibody binding to CD52 a cell surface antigen present at high level on T ab B lymphocytes, entered Phase I.

    SAR113244 (anti-CXCR5), a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody in Phase I for the treatment of osteoarthritis by intra-articular administration).Systemic lupus Erythematosus. A Phase 1B multiple ascending dose study in SLE patients was initiated in December 2014.

    One compound has progressed into phase II clinical development:SAR252067

    , a fully human antibody targeted against TNFSF14 (LIGHT) in Phase I in Crohn's disease.

    Projects discontinued in 2014

    SAR292833SAR100842 — GCR-15300, licensing agreement with Glenmark Pharmaceutical (TRPV3 antagonist for(LPA1 receptor antagonist) a Phase IIA study in the oral treatment of chronic pain).

    systemic sclerosis was completed in 2013. Based on the clinical data the decision was taken to terminate the program.

Two compounds have entered Phase I clinical development:e)    Age Related Degenerative Diseases

    SAR228810 (anti-protofibrillar AB mAb for the treatment of patients with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's dementia)Disease (AD) is in Phase I, in mild to moderate AD patients with confirmed amyloid pathology, in order to assess safety and PK (single and multiple IV and SC doses).

    SAR391786 — REGN1033 (Anti, a monoclonal antibody against GDF8 — mAb(also known as myostatin), derived from our alliance with Regeneron, is in sarcopenia) in collaboration with Regeneron.

    One nutraceutical project has entered aPhase II clinical program:

    SAR399063 (DHA-GPL & Vit D)development for the treatment of elderly patients with sarcopenia.

f)     Infectious Diseases

    Three compounds have entered preclinical development:

    SAR396049Ferroquine (CDRAP-MIA in osteoarthritis)(OZ439), licensing agreement with SCIL.

    SAR244181 (P75 dimerization inhibitor in Overactive Bladder).

    SAR296968 (NCX inhibitor in Chronic Heart Failure).

    Two compounds have been terminated:

    SAR114137 (CathepsinS/K inhibitor for the oral treatment of chronic pain).

    SAR407899 (Rho-Kinase inhibitor).

    Discovery/development partnerships:

    The agreement with Audion Therapeutics (research in hearing disorders) has been terminated.

    An agreement was signed in March 2012 with CNRH, INRA, ASL, 3iNature (Biotechs in Auvergne, France) on the development of products for treatment of sarcopenia.

        Other comprehensive income recognized in respect of available-for-sale financial assets represents unrealized net after-tax gains of €1,745 million as of December 31, 2012 (including €1,669 million for the investment in Regeneron), versus €409 million as of December 31, 2011 and €164 million as of December 31, 2010.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
2012.

        A 10% fall in the stock prices of quoted equity investments classified as available-for-sale financial assets would have had the following impact as of December 31, 2012:2014:

(€ million)

Sensitivity
  

Other comprehensive income before tax

 (23193)

Income before tax

  
 

Total

(93) 
Total(231)
    

        As regards other available-for-sale financial assets, a 10% fall in stockquoted market prices combined with a simultaneous 0.5% rise in the yield curve would have had the following impact as of December 31, 2012:2014:

(€ million)

Sensitivity
  

Other comprehensive income before tax

 (1815)

Income before tax

  
 

Total(1)

(15) 
Total (1)(18)
    
(1)
This impact would represent approximately 6%4,5% of the value of the underlying assets.assets involved.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Unquoted equity investments

        Available-for-sale financial assets also include equity investments not quoted in an active market. These investments had aThe carrying amount of those investments was €79 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and €82 million as of December 31, 2012, €2602012.

Other disclosures about available-for-sale financial assets

        Other comprehensive income recognized in respect of available-for-sale financial assets represented unrealized gains (net of taxes) amounting to €234 million as of December 31, 2011, and €472014; €2,744 million (including €2,625 million on the investment in Regeneron) as of December 31, 2010. The reduction in 2012 is related to the sale of2013; and €1,745 million (including €1,669 million on the investment in Yves Rocher.

        The carrying amount of Greek government bondsRegeneron) as of December 31, 2012 was €16 million, of which €8 million are reported in2012.

Current financial assetsLong-term loans and advances and other non-current receivables (see Note D.12.).

        AssetsLong-term loans and advances and other non-current receivables also include tax receivables due after more than one year.

Financial assets recognized under the fair value option

        Financial assets recognized under the fair value option represent a portfolio of financial investments held to fund a deferred compensation plan offeredprovided to certain employees.

D.8. Assets and liabilities held for sale or exchangeASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE OR EXCHANGE

        A breakdown as of December 31, 2012 of assetsAssets held for sale or exchange, and of liabilities related to assets held for sale or exchange, is shown below:comprise:

(€ million)
  
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 
  
Merial (1) D.8.2.      7,019 
Other D.8.1.  101  67  17 
  
Total assets held for sale or exchange    101  67  7,036 
  
Merial (1) D.8.2.      1,672 
Other D.8.1.  38  20   
  
Total liabilities related to assets held for sale or exchange    38  20  1,672 
  
 

(€ million)

December 31,
2014

 
December 31,
2013

 
December 31,
2012

 
 
    

Assets held for sale or exchange

 1014 101  
 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale or exchange

 1 39  
 
(1)
The assets of Merial, classified inAssets held for sale or exchange in 2010, were reclassified in 2011 to the relevant balance sheet line items, in accordance with paragraph 26 of IFRS 5.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.8.1. Other assets held for sale

        As of December 31, 2012, other assets held for sale mainly comprised certain assets of BMP Sunstone held for sale;sale, Zentiva's industrial site at Hlohovec (Slovakia);, and research and development sites in the United States and France.

        As of December 31, 2011, other assets held for sale mainly comprised assets of the BMP Sunstone sub-group that had been held for sale since the acquisition date, plus research and development sites in France and industrial or tertiary sites in Europe.

        As of December 31, 2010, other assets held for sale comprised research and development sites in France.

D.8.2. MerialD.9. INVENTORIES

        As explainedInventories break down as follows:

 2014  2013  2012  
 

(€ million)

Gross
value

 
Write-
down

 
Carrying
amount

 
Gross
value

 
Write-
down

 
Carrying
amount

 
Gross
value

 
Write-
down

 
Carrying
amount

 
 
    

Raw materials

 1,053(79)974 971 (86)885 969 (72)897  
 

Work in process

 4,021(488)3,533 3,926 (362)3,564 3,755 (294)3,461  
 

Finished goods

 2,258(203)2,055 2,082 (179)1,903 2,171 (150)2,021  
 

Total

7,332 (770)6,562 6,979 (627)6,352 6,895 (516)6,379  
    

        Write-downs include inventories of products held in Note D.2., the assets andstock pending marketing approval.

        Inventories pledged as security for liabilities of Merial have been reported in the relevant balance sheet line item since January 1, 2011.

        The table below shows the assets and liabilities of Merial classified inAssets held for sale or exchange andLiabilities relatedamounted to assets held for sale or exchange€46 million as of December 31, 2010, after elimination2014 (compared with €24 million as of intercompany balances between MerialDecember 31, 2013 and other Group companies.€16 million as of December 31, 2012).

(€ million)
December 31,
2010

Assets

• Property, plant and equipment and financial assets

811

• Goodwill

1,210

• Other intangible assets

3,961

• Deferred tax assets

92

• Inventories

344

• Accounts receivable

405

• Other current assets

49

• Cash and cash equivalents

147
Total assets held for sale or exchange7,019
Liabilities

• Long-term debt

4

• Non-current provisions

70

• Deferred tax liabilities

1,132

• Short-term debt

24

• Accounts payable

161

• Other current liabilities

281
Total liabilities related to assets held for sale or exchange1,672

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.9. Inventories

        Inventories break down as follows:

 
 December 31, 2012
 December 31, 2011
 December 31, 2010
 
 
   
(€ million)
 Gross
 Impairment
 Net
 Gross
 Impairment
 Net
 Gross
 Impairment
 Net
 
  
Raw materials  969  (72) 897  973  (93) 880  838  (88) 750 
Work in process  3,755  (294) 3,461  3,444  (209) 3,235  2,940  (255) 2,685 
Finished goods  2,171  (150) 2,021  2,107  (171) 1,936  1,714  (129) 1,585 
  
Total  6,895  (516) 6,379  6,524  (473) 6,051  5,492  (472) 5,020 
  

        The value of inventories related to Genzyme was €925 million at the acquisition date (see note D.1.2.) and €540 million at December 31, 2011. Merial inventories reclassified as of January 1, 2011 amounted to €344 million (see note D.8.2.).

        The impact of changes in provisions for impairment of inventories was a net expense of €28 million in 2012, compared with €6 million in 2011 and €22 million in 2010.

        Inventories pledged as security for liabilities amounted to €16 million as of December 31, 2012.

D.10. Accounts receivableACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

        Accounts receivable break down as follows:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Gross value 7,641 8,176 6,633  7,3266,968 7,641  
Impairment (134) (134) (126)
 
Net value 7,507 8,042 6,507 

Allowance

 (177)(137)(134) 
 

Carrying amount

7,149 6,831 7,507  

        The valueimpact of trade receivables related to Genzyme totaled €764 million at the acquisition date (see Note D.1.2.). Merial trade receivables reclassified as of January 1, 2011 amounted to €405 million (see Note D.8.2.).

        Impairment losses (net of reversals)allowances against accounts receivable (see Note B.8.2.) amounted toin the year ended December 31, 2014 was a net expense of €37 million (versus €28 million in 2013 and €11 million in 2012, compared with €32 million in both 2011 and 2010.2012).

        The gross value of overdue receivables as of December 31, 2012 was €1,057 million, compared with €1,103€849 million as of December 31, 2011 and €8872014 (versus €952 million as of December 31, 2010.2013 and €1,057 million as of December 31, 2012).

(€ million)
 Overdue accounts
Gross value

 Overdue
<1 month

 Overdue from
1 to 3 months

 Overdue from
3 to 6 months

 Overdue from
6 to 12 months

 Overdue
>12 months

 Overdue accounts
Gross value

 
Overdue
< 1 month

 
Overdue
1 to 3
months


 
Overdue
3 to 6
months


 
Overdue
6 to 12
months


 
Overdue
> 12 months

 
 
 

December 31, 2014

849 277 189 126 87 170  

December 31, 2013

 952 265 222 173 124 168  
December 31, 2012 1,057 371 247 152 126 161  1,057 371 247 152 126 161  
December 31, 2011 1,103 278 227 187 135 276 
December 31, 2010 887 255 207 127 97 201 
 

        Amounts overdue by more than one month relate mainly to public-sector customers.

        Some Sanofi subsidiaries have assigned receivables to factoring companies or banks, without recourse. Because theseThe amount of receivables that met the conditions described in Note B.8.7. and hence were assigned without recourse, they have been derecognized from the balance sheetwas €428 million as of December 31, 2012; the amount involved is2014 (€348 million as of December 31, 2013; €53 million.million as of December 31, 2012). The residual guarantees relating to thesesuch transfers are immaterial.were immaterial as of December 31, 2014.

D.11. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

        Other current assets break down as follows:

 

(€ million)

2014 2013 2012  
    

Taxes recoverable

 1,3911,556 1,575  
 

Other receivables(1)

 470467 522  
 

Prepaid expenses

 296264 258  
 

Total

2,157 2,287 2,355  
    
(1)
This line mainly comprises amounts due from alliance partners, advance payments to suppliers, and amounts due from employees.

D.12. CURRENT FINANCIAL ASSETS

        Current financial assets break down as follows:

 

(€ million)

2014 2013 2012  
    

Interest rate derivatives measured at fair value (see Note D.20.)

 9824 40  
 

Currency derivatives measured at fair value (see Note D.20.)

 111102 82  
 

Other current financial assets(1)

 959 56  
 

Total

218 185 178  
    
(1)
Includes €8 million of Greek government bonds as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.11. Other current assets

        Other current assets break down as follows:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 
  
Taxes recoverable  1,575  1,455  1,188 
Other receivables (1)  522  690  626 
Prepaid expenses  258  256  186 
  
Total  2,355  2,401  2,000 
  
(1)
This line mainly comprises amounts due from alliance partners, advance payments to suppliers, sales commission receivable, and amounts due from employees.

D.12. Current financial assets

        Current financial assets break down as follows:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 
  
Interest rate derivatives measured at fair value (see Note D.20.)  40  90  1 
Currency derivatives measured at fair value (see Note D.20.)  82  48  27 
Other current financial assets  56 (1) 35 (2) 23 
  
Total  178  173  51 
  
(1)
Includes €8 million of Greek government bonds as of December 31, 2012 (see Note D.7.).
(2)
Includes €23 million of Greek government bonds as of December 31, 2011.

D.13. Cash and cash equivalentsCASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Cash 904 1,029 696  1,843953 904  
Cash equivalents (1) 5,477 3,095 5,769  5,4987,304 5,477  
 
Cash and cash equivalents (2) 6,381 4,124 6,465 7,341 8,257 6,381  
 
(1)
Cash equivalents asAs of December 31, 20122014, cash equivalents mainly comprised (i) €2,964€2,537 million invested in collective investment schemes, including euro-denominated mutual funds classified by the AMF as "money-market""money market" or "short-term money-market" and U.S. dollar-denominated money-market funds compliant with SEC Rule 2a-7money market" (December 31, 2011: €1,8792013: €2,652 million; December 31, 2012: €2,062 million); (ii) €1,065€1,756 million of term deposits (December 31, 2011: €3162013: €2,125 million; December 31, 2012: €1,065 million); (iii) €510€495 million ofin commercial paper (December 31, 2011: €2602013: €1,408 million; December 31, 2012: €510 million); and (iv) €507€587 million held by captive insurance and reinsurance companies in accordance with insurance regulations (December 31, 2011: €4602013: €573 million; December 31, 2012: €507 million).
(2)
Includes €100€242 million held by the Venezuelan subsidiarysubsidiaries as of December 31, 2012,2014 (€137 million as of December 31, 2013 and €100 million as of December 31, 2012), which is subject to foreign exchange controls.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.14. Net deferred tax positionNET DEFERRED TAX POSITION

        The net deferred tax position breaks down as follows:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 
  
Deferred tax on:          
• Consolidation adjustments (intragroup margin in inventory)  1,156  858  875 
• Provision for pensions and other employee benefits  1,608  1,297  1,157 
• Remeasurement of other acquired intangible assets (1)  (5,641) (6,815) (3,706)
• Recognition of acquired property, plant and equipment at fair value  (83) (75) (76)
• Equity interests in subsidiaries and investments in foreign affiliates (2)  (1,276) (1,154) (399)
• Tax losses available for carry-forward  593  617  152 
• Stock options and other share-based payment  79  40  12 
• Accrued expenses and provisions deductible at the time of payment (3)  1,923  1,946  1,349 
• Other  86  389  (121)
  
Net deferred tax liability  (1,555) (2,897) (757)
  
 

(€ million)

2014 2013(1) 2012(1)  
    

Deferred taxes on:

       
 

Consolidation adjustments (intragroup margin in inventory)

 1,2051,209 1,156  
 

Provision for pensions and other employee benefits

 1,6611,329 1,610  
 

Remeasurement of other acquired intangible assets(2)

 (4,095)(4,182)(5,641) 
 

Recognition of acquired property, plant and equipment at fair value

 (59)(63)(83) 
 

Equity interests in subsidiaries and investments in other entities(3)

 (906)(1,346)(1,276) 
 

Tax losses available for carry-forward

 738600 593  
 

Stock options and other share-based payments

 119112 79  
 

Accrued expenses and provisions deductible at the time of payment(4)

 1,9701,642 1,913  
 

Other

 122(217)86  
 

Total net deferred tax asset/(liability)

755 (916)(1,563) 
    
(1)
Includes the impact of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2.).
(2)
Includes the following deferred tax liabilities of €1,417 million as of December 31, 20122014: €727 million relating to the remeasurement of Aventisthe other intangible assets €2,761of Aventis, €2,438 million relating to Genzyme, and €368€176 million relating to Merial.
(2)(3)
In some countries, the Group is liable to withholding taxes and other tax charges when dividends are distributed. Consequently, the Group recognizes a deferred tax liability on the reserves of foreign subsidiaries (approximately €22.6€27.7 billion) which the Group regards as likely to be distributed in the foreseeable future. In determining the amount of the deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2014, Sanofi took account of changes in some of the ownership chains of its subsidiaries.
(3)(4)
Includes deferred tax assets related to restructuring provisions, amounting to €405 million as of December 31, 2014, €531 million as of December 31, 2013, and €615 million as of December 31, 2012, €451 million as of December 31, 2011, and €389 million as of December 31, 2010.2012.

        The reserves of Sanofi subsidiaries that would be taxable if distributed but for which no distribution is planned, and for which no deferred tax liability has therefore been recognized, totaled €20.1 billion as of December 31, 2014, compared with €20.4 billion as of December 31, 2013 and €18.4 billion as of December 31, 2012, compared with €15.7 billion as2012.

        Most of December 31, 2011 and €16.2 billion as of December 31, 2010.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        The table below shows when the tax losses available for carry-forward by the Group are due to expire:

(€ million)
 Tax losses available
for carry-forward (1)

 
  
2013  24 
2014  15 
2015  30 
2016  16 
2017  145 
2018 and later (2)  2,197 
  
Total at December 31, 2012  2,427 (3)
  
Total at December 31, 2011  2,699 (4)
  
Total at December 31, 2010  1,028 (5)
  
(1)
ExcludingGroup's tax loss carry-forwards on asset disposals. Tax loss carry-forwards on asset disposals were zero at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, versus €101 million at December 31, 2010.
(2)
Mainly comprises tax lossesare available for carry-forward indefinitely.
(3)
The Group's For a description of policies for the recognition of deferred tax assets, are described inrefer to Note B.22. The recognition of deferred tax assets is determined on the basis of profit forecasts for each tax group. TheseThose forecasts are consistent with the Group's long-termmedium-term business plan, and are based on time horizons that take account of the period of availability of tax loss carry-forwards and the specific circumstances of each tax group. Deferred tax assets relating to tax loss carry-forwards as of December 31, 20122014 amounted to €734€1,237 million, of which €141€499 million were not recognized.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below shows when the tax losses available for carry-forward are due to expire:

 

(€ million)

Tax losses available
for carry-forward(1)

 
 
    

2015

 5  
 

2016

 33  
 

2017

 57  
 

2018

 50  
 

2019

 33  
 

2020 and later

 3,575  
 

Total as of December 31, 2014

3,753  
    

Total as of December 31, 2013

2,527&zwsp;(2) 
    

Total as of December 31, 2012

2,427&zwsp;(3) 
    
(1)
Excluding tax loss carry-forwards on asset disposals. Such carry-forwards amounted to zero as of December 31, 2014, €158 million as of December 31, 2013, and zero as of December 31, 2012.
(4)(2)
Deferred tax assets relating to tax loss carry-forwards as of December 31, 20112013 amounted to €843€824 million, of which €226€224 million were not recognized.
(5)(3)
Deferred tax assets relating to tax loss carry-forwards as of December 31, 20102012 amounted to €357€734 million, of which €205€141 million were not recognized.

        Use of tax loss carry-forwards is limited to the entity in which they arose. In jurisdictions where tax consolidations are in place, tax losses can be netted against taxable income generated by entities in the same consolidated tax group.

        Deferred tax assets not recognized because their future recovery was not regarded as probable given the expected results of the entities in question amounted to €586 million in 2014, €506 million in 2013 and €413 million in 2012, €476 million in 2011, and €451 million in 2010 (including €35 million on asset disposals).2012.

D.15. Consolidated shareholders' equityCONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

D.15.1. Share capital

        TheAs of December 31, 2014, the share capital stood at €2,638,734,890, consisting of €2,652,685,918 consists of 1,326,342,9591,319,367,445 shares with a par value of €2.

Treasury shares held by the Group are as follows:

 
 Number of shares
in million

 %
 
  
December 31, 2012  3.1  0.24% 
December 31, 2011  17.2  1.28% 
December 31, 2010  6.1  0.46% 
January 1, 2010  9.4  0.71% 
  
 

Number of shares
(million)

 
% of share capital
for the period

 
 
    

December 31, 2014

 9.5 0.72%  
 

December 31, 2013

 3.6 0.27%  
 

December 31, 2012

 3.1 0.24%  
 

January 1, 2012

 17.2 1.28%  
 

        Treasury shares are deducted from shareholders' equity. Gains and losses on disposals of treasury shares are taken directly to equity and are not recognized in net income for the period.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Movements in the share capital of the Sanofi parent company over the last three years are presented below:

Date
 Transaction
 Number of
shares

 Share
capital (1)

 Additional
paid-in
capital (1)

 
  
January 1, 2010    1,318,479,052  2,637  6,738 
  
During 2010 Capital increase by exercise of stock subscription options  430,033  1  17 
Board of Directors meeting of April 28, 2010 Capital reduction by cancellation of treasury shares  (7,911,300) (16) (404)
  
December 31, 2010    1,310,997,785  2,622  6,351 
  
During 2011 Capital increase by exercise of stock subscription options  1,593,369  4  66 
During 2011 Capital increase by issue of restricted shares  587,316  1  (1)
June 16, 2011 Capital increase by payment of dividends in shares  38,139,730  76  1,814 
Board of Directors meeting of July 27, 2011 Capital reduction by cancellation of treasury shares  (2,328,936) (5) (116)
Board of Directors meeting of November 2, 2011 Capital reduction by cancellation of treasury shares  (8,070,453) (16) (372)
  
December 31, 2011    1,340,918,811  2,682  7,742 
  
During 2012 Capital increase by exercise of stock subscription options  11,945,454  24  621 
During 2012 Capital increase by issue of restricted shares  1,074,063  2  (2)
Board of Directors meeting of April 26, 2012 Capital reduction by cancellation of treasury shares  (21,159,445) (42) (1,088)
Board of Directors meeting of October 24, 2012 Capital reduction by cancellation of treasury shares  (6,435,924) (13) (405)
  
December 31, 2012    1,326,342,959  2,653  6,868 
  
 

Date

Transaction Number
of shares

 
Share
capital(1)

 
Additional
paid-in capital(1)

 
 
    

December 31, 2011

  1,340,918,811 2,682 7,742  
    

During 2012

 Capital increase by exercise of stock subscription options 11,945,454 24 621  
 

During 2012

 Capital increase by issuance of restricted shares 1,074,063 2 (2) 
 

Board meeting of April 26, 2012

 Reduction in share capital by cancellation of treasury shares (21,159,445)(42)(1,088) 
 

Board meeting of October 24, 2012

 Reduction in share capital by cancellation of treasury shares (6,435,924)(13)(405) 
 

December 31, 2012

  1,326,342,959 2,653 6,868  
    

During 2013

 Capital increase by exercise of stock subscription options 15,194,601 31 875  
 

During 2013

 Capital increase by issuance of restricted shares 1,927,099 4 (4) 
 

Board meeting of April 30, 2013

 Reduction in share capital by cancellation of treasury shares (8,387,236)(17)(585) 
 

Board meeting of July 31, 2013

 Reduction in share capital by cancellation of treasury shares (5,885,439)(12)(488) 
 

Board meeting of December 19, 2013

 Reduction in share capital by cancellation of treasury shares (6,543,301)(13)(487) 
 

During 2013

 Capital increase reserved for employees 1,672,198 3 95  
 

December 31, 2013

  1,324,320,881 2,649 6,274  
    

During 2014

 Capital increase by exercise of stock subscription options 10,974,771 22 658  
 

During 2014

 Capital increase by issuance of restricted shares 1,856,847 4 (4) 
 

Board meeting of April 28, 2014

 Reduction in share capital by cancellation of treasury shares (8,136,828)(16)(588) 
 

Board meeting of October 27, 2014

 Reduction in share capital by cancellation of treasury shares (9,648,226)(20)(726) 
 

December 31, 2014

  1,319,367,445 2,639 5,614  
    
(1)
Amounts expressed in € million.millions of euros.

        For equity relatedthe disclosures asabout the management of capital required under IFRS 7, refer to Note B.27.

        A total of 11,945,45410,974,771 shares were issued during 2012in 2014 as a result of the exercise of Sanofi stock subscription options.

        In addition, a total of 1,074,0631,856,847 shares vested and were issued in 20122014 under restricted share plans. This total includes 523,477 shares issued in March 2012 under the March 1, 2010 plan, and 533,000 shares issued in October 2012 to grantees in France under the global plan under which all employees were entitled to 20 shares each.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.15.2. Restricted share plans

        Restricted share plans are accounted for in accordance with the policies described in Note B.24.3. The principal characteristics of these plans are as follows:

     

    Type of plan

    2014
    Performance
    share plan


     
    2013
    Performance
    share plan


     
    2012
    Performance
    share plan


     
     
        

    Date of Board meeting approving the plan

     March 5, 2014 March 5, 2013 March 5, 2012  
     

    Total number of shares awarded

     3,908,135 4,295,705 4,694,260  
     

    Of which subject to a 4-year service period:

     2,605,515 2,838,795 3,127,160  
     

    Fair value per share awarded(1)

     59.68 58.29 42.85  
     

    Of which subject to a 3-year service period:

     1,302,620 1,456,910 1,567,100  
     

    Fair value per share awarded(1)

     63.26 62.19 46.15  
     

    Fair value of plan at the date of grant (€ million)

     238 256 206  
     
    (1)
    The Board of Directors meeting of March 5, 2012 approved a restricted share plan with performance conditions involving 4,694,260 shares, of which 3,127,160 will vest after a four-year service period and 1,567,100 will vest after a three-year service period but will be subject to a further two-year lock-up period.

      The plan was measured as of the date of grant. The fair value per share awarded is the quotedQuoted market price per share asat the date of that date (€57.62),grant, adjusted for dividends expected during the vesting period.

      The fair value of this plan is €192 million. This amount is being recognized in profit or loss over the vesting period, with the matching entry recognized directly in equity; the expense recognized in 2012 was €45 million.

    The Board of Directors meeting of March 9, 2011 approved a restricted share plan with performance conditions involving 3,330,650 shares, of which 1,934,610 will vest after a four-year service period and 1,396,040 will vest after a two-year service period but will be subject to a further two-year lock-up period. The fair value per share awarded is the quoted market price per share as of the date of grant (€50.28), adjusted for dividends expected during the vesting period.

      The fair value of this plan is €125 million.

    The Board of Directors meeting of October 27, 2010 approved a worldwide restricted share plan, under which 20 shares were awarded to each employee of the Group. The fair value per share awarded is the quoted market price per share as of the date of grant (€49.53), adjusted for dividends expected during the vesting period. A total of 2,101,340 shares were awarded under this plan.

      The fair value of this plan is €67 million.

    The Board of Directors meeting of March 1, 2010 approved a restricted share plan involving 1,231,249 shares, of which 699,524 will vest after a four-year service period and 531,725 will vest after a two-year service period but will be subject to a further two-year lock-up period. The fair value per share awarded is the quoted market price per share as of the date of grant (€54.82), adjusted for expected dividends during the vesting period.

      The fair value of this plan is €50 million.

        The total expense recognized for all restricted share plans in the year ended December 31, 2012 was €1252014 amounted to €187 million (including €22 million for the Vaccines segment and €10 million for the Animal Health segment), compared with €84€155 million in the year ended December 31, 20112013 and €36€125 million in the year ended December 31, 2010.2012.

        The number of restricted shares not yet fully vested as of December 31, 20122014 was 10,414,053,14,025,905, comprising 4,584,9203,855,015 under the 2014 plans; 4,124,050 under the 2013 plans; 4,346,320 under the 2012 plans, 3,184,240plans; and 1,700,520 under the 2011 plans, 1,470,980 under the October 2010 plans, 631,544 under the March 2010 plans, and 542,369 under the March 2009 plans.

        The number of restricted shares not yet fully vested was 7,062,32412,473,621 as of December 31, 20112013 and 4,467,96810,414,053 as of December 31, 2010.

D.15.3. Capital increase2012.

        On May 6, 2011,March 5, 2014, the Annual General MeetingBoard of Directors approved a performance share unit (PSU) plan, vesting at the end of a three-year service period and subject to performance conditions.

        Because PSUs are cash-settled instruments, they are measured at the grant date, at the end of each reporting period, and at the settlement date. The fair value is determined on the basis of the quoted market price per share as of the measurement date, adjusted for expected dividends during the vesting period.

        The fair value of the PSU plan (based on vested rights and including social security charges) as of December 31, 2014, and recognized as a liability as of that date, was €10 million.

D.15.3. Capital increases

        There were no capital increases reserved for employees in either 2014 or 2012.

        On October 29, 2013, the Sanofi Board of Directors approved an employee share ownership plan in the form of a capital increase reserved for employees. Group employees were offered the opportunity to subscribe to the capital increase at a price of €59.25, representing 80% of the average of the quoted market prices of Sanofi shareholders approvedshares during the payment20 trading days preceding the date of a dividendthe Board meeting. A total of €2.50 per share1.7 million shares were subscribed during the subscription period, which was open from November 7 through November 24, 2013. An expense of €21 million was recognized for this plan in respect of the year ended December 31, 2010, with an option for payment in cash or in newly-issued Sanofi shares. This option was exercised by shareholders representing 57.8% of the shares, as a result which 38,139,730 new shares were issued for payment of the dividend in shares. The shares issued represent 2.9% of the share capital, and led to an increase of €76 million in the share capital and €1,814 million in additional paid-in capital (net of issuance costs)2013 (see Note B.24.2.).

        Capital increases arising from the exercise of Sanofi stock subscription options and restricted share plans are described in Note D.15.1.

        There were no share issues reserved for employees in 2010, 2011 or 2012.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.15.4. Repurchase of Sanofi shares

        On May 4, 2012,5, 2014, the Annual General Meeting of Sanofi shareholders approved a share repurchase program for a period of 18 months. Under thisthat program and only this(and that program alone), the Group repurchased 6,060,15015,662,113 of its own shares in 2012during 2014 for a total amount of €397€1,201 million.

        On May 6, 2011,3, 2013, the Annual General Meeting of Sanofi shareholders approved a share repurchase program for a period of 18 months. Under thisthat program (and that program alone), the Group repurchased 7,513,4938,007,926 of its own shares induring 2014 for a total amount of €600 million and 15,806,658 shares during 2013 for a total amount of €1,241 million.

        The Group also repurchased 5,528,486 of its own shares during the first half of 2013 for a total amount of €400 million, and 6,060,150 of its own shares during 2012 for a total amount of €426€397 million, and 21,655,140 shares in 2011 for a total amount of €1,074 million.

        On May 17, 2010,under the Annual General Meeting of Sanofi shareholders approved a share repurchase program for a period of 18 months. The Group did not repurchase any of its own shares under this program.authorized in 2012.

D.15.5. Reductions in share capital

        On October 24, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of 6,435,924 treasury shares (€418 million), representing 0.49% of theReductions in share capital as of that date.for the accounting periods presented are described in the table included at Note D.15.1. above.

        On April 26, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of 21,159,445 treasury shares (€1,130 million), representing 1.60% of the share capital as of that date.

        On November 2, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of 8,070,453 treasury shares (€388 million), representing 0.60% of the share capital as of that date.

        On July 27, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of 2,328,936 treasury shares (€121 million), representing 0.17% of the share capital as of that date.

        On April 28, 2010, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of 7,911,300 treasury shares (€420 million), representing 0.60% of the share capital as of that date.

        TheseThose cancellations had no effect on shareholders' equity.

D.15.6. Currency translation differences

        Currency translation differences break down as follows:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011 (1)

 December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Attributable to equity holders of Sanofi (1,918) (1,390) (1,318) (1,211)(3,707)(1,917) 
Attributable to non-controlling interests (24) (16) (4) (28)(38)(24) 
 
Total (1,942) (1,406) (1,322)(1,239)(3,745)(1,941) 
 
(1)
In accordance with IFRS 3 (Business Combinations), Sanofi made adjustments during the Genzyme purchase price allocation period

        The balance as of December 31, 2014 includes an after-tax amount of €72 million relating to somehedges of a net investment in a foreign operation (refer to Note B.8.4. for a description of the provisional amounts recognized in 2011 (see Note D.1.2.).

relevant accounting policy); this amount is unchanged from the previous accounting periods presented.

        The movement in currencyCurrency translation differences during the period was is mainly dueattributable to the effect of changes in the U.S. dollar exchange rate, primarily on goodwill, intangible assets and inventories.

        In accordance with the accounting policy described in Note B.8.4., currency translation differences attributable to equity holders of Sanofi include the effects of currency hedges of net investments in foreign operations; these effects (after tax) were €72 million at December 31, 2012, €66 million at December 31, 2011, and €85 million at December 31, 2010.dollar.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.15.7. Other comprehensive income

        Movements in other comprehensive income are as follows:shown below:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011 (1)

 Year ended
December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Balance, beginning of period (1,477) (1,102) (3,755)(1,745)(1,596)(1,413) 
 
Attributable to equity holders of Sanofi (1,460) (1,097) (3,739) (1,707)(1,572)(1,396) 
Attributable to non-controlling interests (17) (5) (16) (38)(24)(17) 
 
Actuarial gains/(losses) 

Actuarial gains/(losses):

       

• Impact of asset ceiling

 1  1   1  

• Actuarial gains/(losses) excluding associates and joint ventures

 (1,549) (677) (311)

• Actuarial gains/(losses) on associates and joint ventures

 (7)  (1)

• Actuarial gains/(losses) excluding associates and joint ventures (see Note D.19.1.)

 (863)809 (1,440) 

• Actuarial gains/(losses) on associates and joint ventures, net of taxes

 (6)1 (6) 

• Tax effects

 492 138 172  303(152)464  
 
Items not subsequently reclassifiable to profit or loss (1,063) (539) (139)(566)658 (981) 
 
Available-for-sale financial assets:        

• Change in fair value (2)

 1,451 250 141 

• Change in fair value excluding associates and joint ventures(1) / (2)

 (2,768)1,208 1,451  

• Change in fair value on associates and joint ventures net of taxes

 8   

• Tax effects

 (114) (5) (15) 250(209)(114) 
Cash flow hedges:        

• Change in fair value (3)

 (4) 5 17 

• Change in fair value excluding associates and joint ventures(3)

 (3)(7) 

• Change in fair value on associates and joint ventures net of taxes

  2  

• Tax effects

 1 (2) (6) 1 2  
Change in currency translation differences:        

• Currency translation differences on foreign subsidiaries (4)

 (542) (65) 2,656 

• Currency translation differences on foreign subsidiaries(3)

 2,334(1,804)(542) 

• Currency translation differences on associates and joint ventures

 172   

• Hedges of net investments in foreign operations

 10 (30) (2)  10  

• Tax effects

 (4) 11 1   (4) 
 
Items subsequently reclassifiable to profit or loss 798 164 2,792 (4)(807)798  
 
Balance, end of period (1,742) (1,477) (1,102)(2,315)(1,745)(1,596) 
 
Attributable to equity holders of Sanofi (1,718) (1,460) (1,097) (2,287)(1,707)(1,572) 
Attributable to non-controlling interests (24) (17) (5) (28)(38)(24) 
 
(1)
In accordance with IFRS 3 (Business Combinations), Sanofi made adjustments during the Genzyme purchase price allocation period to some of the provisional amounts recognized in 2011 (see Note D.1.2.).
(2)
IncludingIncludes reclassifications to profit or loss: (€16 million)€(79) million in 2012, not significant2014, €(42) million in 2011 or 2010.2013 and €(16) million in 2012.
(3)(2)
Including reclassificationsImpact mainly due to Regeneron (see Notes D.1. and D.7.).
(3)
The amounts reclassified to profit or loss were immaterial in operating income: not significant in 2012 or 2011, €7 million in 2010; in net financial expense, €0.4 million in 2012, €2 million in 20112014, 2013 and €5 million in 2010.
(4)2012.
Includes reclassifications to profit or loss of (€1 million) in 2012, €1 million in 2011 and €3 million in 2010.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.15.8. Share-based paymentStock options

Stock option plans

a) Assumption by Sanofi of the obligations of Aventis

Stock subscription option plans awarded

        With effect from December 31, 2004, Sanofi substituted for Aventis in allOn March 5, 2014, the rights and obligationsBoard of the issuer in respect ofDirectors granted 1,009,250 stock subscription options granted to employeesat an exercise price of €73.48 per share. The vesting period is four years, and former corporate officers of Aventis and of related companies (as defined in article L.225-180 of the Commercial Code) and not exercised as of that date.plan expires on March 5, 2024.

        With effect from December 31, 2004,On March 5, 2013, the Board of Directors granted 788,725 stock subscription options granted by Aventis and not yet exercised may be exercised in Sanofi shares on the same terms, subject to the adjustments described below. The number and subscriptionat an exercise price of €72.19 per share. The vesting period is four years, and the optioned shares have been adjusted to reflect the share exchange ratio applicable to Aventis shareholders, subject to possible further adjustment in the event of future capital transactions. The new terms for the exercise of options, subject to future financial adjustments, are as follows:

    The number of Sanofi shares for which each grantee may subscribe under a given stock option plan equals the number of Aventis shares to which the grantee may subscribe under that plan multiplied by the exchange ratio applicable to the shareholders (i.e. 27/23), rounded down to the nearest whole number.

    The subscription price per Sanofi share equals the subscription price per Aventis share divided by the exchange ratio applicable to the shareholders (i.e. 27/23), rounded down to the nearest euro cent.

b) Description of stock option plans

Stock subscription option plansexpires on March 5, 2023.

        On March 5, 2012, the Board of Directors granted 814,050 stock subscription options at an exercise price of €56.44 per share. The vesting period is four years, and the plan expires on March 5, 2022.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Measurement of stock option plans

        On March 9, 2011,The fair value of the Board of Directors granted 874,500 stock subscription options atoption plan awarded in 2014 is €13 million. That amount is recognized as an exercise price of €50.48 per share. Theexpense over the vesting period, with the matching entry recognized directly in equity. On this basis, an expense of €5 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2014.

        The fair value of the stock subscription option plan awarded in 2013 is four€9 million.

        The following assumptions were used in determining the fair value of the plans:

    dividend yield: 4.21% (2014 plan), 4.45% (2013 plan);

    volatility of Sanofi shares, computed on a historical basis: 27.47% (2014 plan), 27.21% (2013 plan);

    risk-free interest rate: 1.42% (2014 plan), 1.40% (2013 plan); and

    plan maturity: 7 years (2014 and 2013 plans). The plan maturity is the average expected remaining life of the options, based on observations of past employee behavior.

        The fair value of the options awarded in 2014 and 2013 is €12.61 and €12.02 per option, respectively.

        The expense recognized for stock option plans, and the plan expires on March 9, 2021.matching entry recognized in equity, was €15 million for 2014 (including €0.3 million for the Vaccines segment), €24 million for 2013 (including €2 million for the Vaccines segment), and €30 million for 2012 (including €3 million for the Vaccines segment).

        On March 1, 2010,As of December 31, 2014, the Boardtotal unrecognized cost of Directors granted 8,121,355unvested stock subscription options at anwas €12 million (compared with €16 million as of December 31, 2013), to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years. The current tax benefit related to the exercise price of €54.12 per share. The vesting period is four years,stock options in 2014 was €30 million (versus €32 million in 2013 and the plan expires on February 28, 2020.€15 million in 2012).

Stock purchase option plans

        The table shows all Sanofi stock purchase option plans still outstanding or under which options were exercised in the year ended December 31, 2012.2014.

Origin
 Date of grant
 Options
granted

 Start date of
exercise period

 Expiration
date

 Exercise
price (€)

 Options
outstanding at
December 31,
2012

 Date of
grant

 
Number of
options
granted


 
Start date of
exercise period

 
Expiry
date

 
Exercise price
(€)

 
Number of options
outstanding as of
December 31, 2014


 
 
 
Synthélabo 10/18/1994 330,200 10/18/1999 10/18/2014 6.01 5,200  10/18/1994 330,200 10/18/1999 10/18/2014 6.01   
Synthélabo 01/12/1996 208,000 01/12/2001 01/12/2016 8.56 8,870  01/12/1996 208,000 01/12/2001 01/12/2016 8.56 3,670  
Synthélabo 04/05/1996 228,800 04/05/2001 04/05/2016 10.85 18,500  04/05/1996 228,800 04/05/2001 04/05/2016 10.85 10,600  
Synthélabo 10/14/1997 262,080 10/14/2002 10/14/2017 19.73 23,442  10/14/1997 262,080 10/14/2002 10/14/2017 19.73 12,480  
Synthélabo 06/25/1998 296,400 06/26/2003 06/25/2018 28.38 3,500  06/25/1998 296,400 06/26/2003 06/25/2018 28.38   
Synthélabo 03/30/1999 716,040 03/31/2004 03/30/2019 38.08 232,025  03/30/1999 716,040 03/31/2004 03/30/2019 38.08 166,581  
Sanofi-Synthélabo 05/22/2002 3,111,850 05/23/2006 05/22/2012 69.94  
 
Total           291,537           193,331  
 

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        Sanofi shares acquired to cover stock purchase option plans are deducted from shareholders' equity. The exercise of all outstanding stock purchase options would increase shareholders' equity by €10€7 million.

Stock subscription option plans

        Details of the terms of exercise of stock subscription options granted under the various plans are presented below in Sanofi share equivalents. These options have been granted to certain corporate officers and employees of Group companies.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table shows all Sanofi stock subscription option plans still outstanding or under which options were exercised in the year ended December 31, 2012.2014.

Origin
 Date of grant
 Options
granted

 Start date of
exercise period

 Expiration
date

 Exercise
price (€)

 Options
outstanding at
December 31,
2012

 Date of
grant

 
Number of
options
granted


 
Start date of
exercise period

 
Expiry
date

 
Exercise price
(€)

 
Number of options
outstanding as of
December 31, 2014


 
 
 
Aventis 03/06/2002 1,173,913 03/07/2005 03/06/2012 69.82  
Aventis 11/12/2002 11,775,414 11/13/2005 11/12/2012 51.34  
Aventis 12/02/2003 12,012,414 12/03/2006 12/02/2013 40.48 1,850,188 
Sanofi-Synthélabo 12/10/2003 4,217,700 12/11/2007 12/10/2013 55.74 1,359,860 
Sanofi-aventis 05/31/2005 15,228,505 06/01/2009 05/31/2015 70.38 12,897,536  05/31/2005 15,228,505 06/01/2009 05/31/2015 70.38 4,717,882  
Sanofi-aventis 12/14/2006 11,772,050 12/15/2010 12/14/2016 66.91 9,591,305  12/14/2006 11,772,050 12/15/2010 12/14/2016 66.91 4,923,345  
Sanofi-aventis 12/13/2007 11,988,975 12/14/2011 12/13/2017 62.33 8,632,330  12/13/2007 11,988,975 12/14/2011 12/13/2017 62.33 4,697,986  
Sanofi-aventis 03/02/2009 7,736,480 03/04/2013 03/01/2019 45.09 7,143,460  03/02/2009 7,736,480 03/04/2013 03/01/2019 45.09 2,918,082  
Sanofi-aventis 03/01/2010 8,121,355 03/03/2014 02/28/2020 54.12 7,597,245  03/01/2010 8,121,355 03/03/2014 02/28/2020 54.12 4,775,105  
Sanofi-aventis 03/09/2011 874,500 03/10/2015 03/09/2021 50.48 844,500  03/09/2011 874,500 03/10/2015 03/09/2021 50.48 844,500  

Sanofi

 03/05/2012 814,050 03/06/2016 03/05/2022 56.44 783,050  

Sanofi

 03/05/2013 788,725 03/06/2017 03/05/2023 72.19 756,975  
Sanofi 03/05/2012 814,050 03/06/2016 03/05/2022 56.44 814,050  03/05/2014 1,009,250 03/06/2018 03/05/2024 73.48 992,000  
 
Total           50,730,474           25,408,925  
 

        The exercise of all outstanding stock subscription options would increase shareholders' equity by approximately €3,060€1,559 million. The exercise of each option results in the issuance of one share.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Summary of stock option plans

        A summary of stock options outstanding at each balance sheet date, and of changes during the relevant periods, is presented below:


  
 Exercise price 

 Number of
options

 Weighted average
per share (€)

 Total
(€ million)

 Number of
options

 
Weighted average
exercise price
per share
(€)



 
Total
(€ million)

 
 
 
Options outstanding at January 1, 2010 87,870,341 61.87 5,436 

Options outstanding at January 1, 2012

 67,732,064 59.54 4,033  
Options exercisable 57,717,316 63.04 3,638  51,916,769 62.51 3,245  
 
Options granted 8,121,355 54.12 440  814,050 56.44 46  
Options exercised (1,756,763) 42.50 (75) (11,999,244)53.87 (646) 
Options cancelled (1) (1,269,312) 59.56 (75) (557,554)58.40 (33) 
Options forfeited (10,694,693) 67.21 (719) (4,967,305)66.40 (330) 
 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2010 82,270,928 60.86 5,007 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2012

 51,022,011 60.17 3,070  
Options exercisable 55,663,453 63.63 3,542  34,622,756 64.93 2,248  
 
Options granted 874,500 50.48 44  788,725 72.19 57  
Options exercised (1,679,029) 43.11 (72) (15,262,957)59.46 (908) 
Options cancelled (1) (1,137,052) 57.64 (66) (264,160)58.44 (15) 
Options forfeited (12,597,283) 69.90 (880) (574,772)43.96 (25) 
 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2011 67,732,064 59.54 4,033 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2013

 35,708,847 61.01 2,179  
Options exercisable 51,916,769 62.51 3,245  25,813,742 63.15 1,630  
 
Options granted 814,050 56.44 46  1,009,250 73.48 74  
Options exercised (11,999,244) 53.87 (646) (11,001,611)61.84 (681) 
Options cancelled (1) (557,554) 58.40 (33) (114,230)60.66 (7) 
Options forfeited (4,967,305) 66.40 (330)     
 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2012 51,022,011 60.17 3,070 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2014

 25,602,256 61.14 1,565  
Options exercisable 34,622,756 64.93 2,248  22,225,731 60.79 1,351  
 
(1)
Cancellations mainlyMainly due to the departure ofgrantees leaving the grantees.Group.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below provides summary information about options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2012:2014:


 
Outstanding

 Exercisable
  Outstanding  Exercisable  
 
Range of exercise prices per share
 Number of
options

 Average
residual life
(in years)

 Weighted
average
exercise
price per
share (€)

 Number of
options

 Weighted
average
exercise
price per
share (€)

 Number of
options

 
Average
residual life
(years)


 
Weighted average exercise price per share
(€)

 
Number of
options

 
Weighted average exercise price per share
(€)

 
 
 
From €1.00 to €10.00 per share 14,070 2.58 7.62 14,070 7.62  3,670 1.03 8.56 3,670 8.56  
From €10.00 to €20.00 per share 41,942 4.12 15.81 41,942 15.81  23,080 2.09 15.65 23,080 15.65  
From €20.00 to €30.00 per share 3,500 5.48 28.38 3,500 28.38 
From €30.00 to €40.00 per share 232,025 6.25 38.08 232,025 38.08  166,581 4.25 38.08 166,581 38.08  
From €40.00 to €50.00 per share 8,993,648 5.09 44.14 1,850,188 40.48  2,918,082 4.17 45.09 2,918,082 45.09  
From €50.00 to €60.00 per share 10,615,655 6.60 54.22 1,359,860 55.74  6,402,655 5.55 53.92 4,775,105 54.12  
From €60.00 to €70.00 per share 18,223,635 4.43 64.74 18,223,635 64.74  9,621,331 2.44 64.67 9,621,331 64.67  
From €70.00 to €80.00 per share 12,897,536 2.41 70.38 12,897,536 70.38  6,466,857 2.67 71.07 4,717,882 70.38  
 
Total 51,022,011     34,622,756   25,602,256     22,225,731    
 

Measurement of stock option plans

        The fair value of the stock subscription option plan awarded in 2012 is €7 million. This amount is recognized as an expense over the vesting period, with the matching entry recognized directly in equity. On this basis, an expense of €1 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2012.

        The fair value of the plan awarded in 2011 was €6 million.

        The following assumptions were used in determining the fair value of these plans:

    Dividend yield: 5.28% (2012 plan) and 5.12% (2011 plan).

    Volatility of Sanofi shares, computed on a historical basis: 26.69% for the 2012 plan, 26.93% for the 2011 plan.

    Risk-free interest rate: 2.30% (2012 plan), 3.05% (2011 plan).

    Plan maturity: 7 years (2012 plan), 6 years (2011 plan). The plan maturity is the average expected remaining life of the options, based on observations of past employee behavior.

        The fair value of the options granted in 2012 and 2011 is €8.42 and €7.88 per option, respectively.

        The expense recognized for stock option plans, and the matching entry recognized in equity, was €30 million for 2012 (including €3 million for the Vaccines segment); €59 million for 2011 (including €6 million for the Vaccines segment); and €97 million for 2010 (including €10 million for the Vaccines segment).

        As of December 31, 2012, the total unrecognized cost of unvested stock options was €31 million, to be recognized over a weighted average period of two years. The current tax benefit related to the exercise of stock options in 2012 was €15 million (versus €2 million in 2011 and €1 million in 2010).


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.15.9. Number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share

        Diluted earnings per share is computed using the number of shares outstanding plus stock options with a potentially dilutive effect.effect and restricted shares.

(in millions)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 
  
Average number of shares outstanding  1,319.5  1,321.7  1,305.3 
Adjustment for options with potentially dilutive effect  4.0  1.7  1.7 
Adjustment for restricted shares with potentially dilutive effect  6.1  3.3  1.2 
  
Average number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share  1,329.6  1,326.7  1,308.2 
  
 

(in millions)

2014 2013 2012  
    

Average number of shares outstanding

 1,315.81,323.1 1,319.5  
 

Adjustment for stock options with dilutive effect

 6.38.9 4.0  
 

Adjustment for restricted shares

 9.07.1 6.1  
 

Average number of shares outstanding used to compute diluted earnings per share

1,331.1 1,339.1 1,329.6  
    

        In 2012, a total of 322014, 1.7 million stock options were not taken into account in the calculation ofcalculating diluted earnings per share because they did not have a potentiallyhad no dilutive effect, compared with 560.8 million stock options in 2013 and 32 million in 2011 and 69.1 million in 2010.2012.

D.16.D.15.10. Non-controlling interests

        Non-controlling interests in consolidated companies break down as follows:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 
  
Non-controlling interests of ordinary shareholders:          
• BMS (1)    34  41 
• Zentiva  14  21  28 
• Sanofi India Ltd  63  58  75 
• Maphar  7  7  7 
• Sanofi-Aventis Korea    7  7 
• Shantha Biotechnics  8  10  9 
• Other  42  33  24 
  
Total  134  170  191 
  
(1)
Under the termsdid not represent a material component of the agreement signedSanofi consolidated financial statements in September 2012 relating to the alliance with BMS (see Note C.1.), Sanofi committed to buy out the non-controlling interests held by BMS for €70 million in 2018. The resulting liability was recognized inNon-current liabilities related to business combinations and to non-controlling interests as ofyears ended December 31, 2012 (see2014, 2013 and 2012.

D.16. FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE

        Under IFRS 7 (Financial Instruments: Disclosures), fair value measurements must be classified using a fair value hierarchy with the following levels:

    level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (without modification or repackaging);

    level 2: quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, and valuation techniques in which all important inputs are derived from observable market data;

    level 3: valuation techniques in which not all important inputs are derived from observable market data.

        The valuation techniques used are described in Note D.18.).

B.8.6.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below shows the balance sheet amounts of assets and liabilities measured at fair value:

   2014  2013  2012  
 

  Level in the fair value hierarchy


 Level in the fair value hierarchy

 Level in the fair value hierarchy
 

(€ million)

 

Note



Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 
 
    

Financial assets measured at fair value in the balance sheet:

                     
 

Quoted equity investments

 D.7. 1,282  3,620   2,479    
 

Unquoted equity investments

 D.7.  79   79   82  
 

Debt securities

 D.7. - D.12.   8   16    
 

Financial assets recognized under the fair value option

 D.7. 225  167   135    
 

Non-current derivatives

 D.7. 219   269   394   
 

Current derivatives

 D.12. 209   126   122   
 

Mutual fund investments

 D.13. 2,537  2,929   2,964    
 

Financial assets measured at fair value

  4,044 428 79 6,724 395 79 5,594 516 82  
    

Financial liabilities measured at fair value in the balance sheet:

                     
 

CVRs issued in connection with the acquisition of Genzyme

 D.18. 154  59   321    
 

Bayer contingent purchase consideration arising from the acquisition of Genzyme

 D.18.  896   650   632  
 

Other contingent consideration arising from business combinations

 D.18.  36   51   305  
 

Liabilities related to non-controlling interests

 D.18.  178   148   192  
 

Non-current derivatives

   1   3      
 

Current derivatives

 D.19.4. 216   17   42   
 

Financial liabilities measured at fair value

  154 217 1,110 59 20 849 321 42 1,129  
    

        No transfers between the different levels of the fair value hierarchy occurred during 2014.

D.17. Debt, cash and cash equivalentsDEBT, CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

        The table below shows changes in the Group's financial position over the last three years:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Long-term debt 10,719 12,499 6,695  13,27610,414 10,719  
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt 3,812 2,940 1,565  1,5384,176 3,812  
 
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt (433) (483) (218) (295)(290)(433) 
 
Total debt 14,098 14,956 8,042 14,519 14,300 14,098  
 
Cash and cash equivalents (6,381) (4,124) (6,465) (7,341)(8,257)(6,381) 
 
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge cash and cash equivalents 2 27   (7) 2  
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 7,719 10,859 1,577 7,171 6,043 7,719  
 

        "Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents" is a financial indicator used by management and investors to measure the company'sGroup's overall net indebtedness.


        A reconciliationTable of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Reconciliation of carrying amount to value on redemption is shown below:

       Value on redemption:  

  
  
  
 Value on redemption
December 31,
 
(€ million)
 Carrying
amount:
Dec. 31, 2012

 Amortized
cost

 Adjustment to
debt measured
at fair value

 2012
 2011
 2010
 Carrying amount:
December 31,
2014


 
Amortized
cost

 
Adjustment to
debt measured
at fair value


 
December 31,
2014

 
December 31,
2013

 
December 31,
2012

 
 
 
Long-term debt 10,719 45 (322) 10,442 12,278 6,683  13,27667 (218)13,125 10,276 10,442  
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt 3,812   3,812 2,937 1,565  1,538 (2)1,536 4,157 3,812  
 
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt (433)  269 (164) (258) (192) (295) 174 (121)(119)(164) 
 
Total debt 14,098 45 (53) 14,090 14,957 8,056 14,519 67 (46)14,540 14,314 14,090  
 
Cash and cash equivalents (6,381)   (6,381) (4,124) (6,465) (7,341)  (7,341)(8,257)(6,381) 
 
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge cash and cash equivalents 2   2 24   (7)  (7) 2  
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 7,719 45 (53) 7,711 10,857 1,591 7,171 67 (46)7,192 6,057 7,711  
 

a)    Principal financing transactions during the year

        The financing transactions that took place during 2012 were as follows:In September 2014, Sanofi carried out a €3 billion bond issue in three tranches:

    a €750€750 million bond issueof bonds maturing November 2017 andSeptember 2018, bearing interest at 3-month Euribor +0.23%;

    €1 billion of bonds maturing March 2022, bearing interest at an annual rate of 1%,1.125%;

    €1.25 billion of bonds maturing September 2026, bearing interest at an annual rate of 1.75%.

        This bond issue was carried out in November 2012 under athe Euro Medium Term NotesNote (EMTN) public bond issue program;

a €428 million bank loan maturing December 2017.
program.

        ThreeFour bond issues were redeemed on maturity:

        On December 8, 2014 the Group agreed:


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The Group also repaid on maturity a €200 million loan from the European Investment Bank, originally contracted on December 13, 2007.

        During 2012, the Group amended the terms of its €7 billion facility as follows:

        On July 16, 2012, the Group agreed an initial one-year extension of its €3 billion syndicated credit facility with the fourteen banks.

b)    Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents by type, at value on redemption

 2014  2013  2012  
(€ million)
 December 31, 2012
 December 31, 2011
 December 31, 2010
 non-
current

 
current Total non-
current

 
current Total non-
current

 
current Total  
 

Bond issues

 12,579843 13,422 9,726 3,111 12,837 9,886 2,509 12,395  

 Non-current
 Current
 Total
 Non-current
 Current
 Total
 Non-current
 Current
 Total
 

Other bank borrowings

 486355 841 487 578 1,065 478 994 1,472  
 
Bond issues 9,886 2,509 12,395 11,662 1,324 12,986 5,879 92 5,971 
Other bank borrowings 478 994 1,472 522 562 1,084 771 402 1,173 
Commercial paper     695 695  735 735 
Finance lease obligations 65 13 78 80 12 92 19 6 25  4715 62 50 13 63 65 13 78  
Other borrowings 13 42 55 14 62 76 14 57 71  134 17 13 4 17 13 42 55  
Bank credit balances  254 254  282 282  273 273  319 319  451 451  254 254  
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt (124) (40) (164) (143) (115) (258) (194) 2 (192) (32)(89)(121)(113)(6)(119)(124)(40)(164) 
 
Total debt 10,318 3,772 14,090 12,135 2,822 14,957 6,489 1,567 8,056 13,093 1,447 14,540 10,163 4,151 14,314 10,318 3,772 14,090  
 
Cash and cash equivalents  (6,381) (6,381)  (4,124) (4,124)  (6,465) (6,465) (7,341)(7,341) (8,257)(8,257) (6,381)(6,381) 
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge cash and cash equivalents  2 2  24 24     (7)(7)    2 2  
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 10,318 (2,607) 7,711 12,135 (1,278) 10,857 6,489 (4,898) 1,591 13,093 (5,901)7,192 10,163 (4,106)6,057 10,318 (2,607)7,711  
 

        Bond issues carried out by Sanofi under the Euro Medium Term NotesNote (EMTN) program comprise:


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        Bond issues carried out by Sanofi under the public bond issue program (shelf registration statement) registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) comprise:

        The U.S. dollar issues have been retained in this currency and have not been swapped into euros.

        Bond issues carried out by Sanofi outside the EMTN program and the U.S. shelf registration statement program consist ofprograms comprise the December 2007 and February 2008 issues [ISIN: CH0035703070] of CHF400 million (€331333 million), maturing December 2015, bearing annual interest at 3.375%, and swapped into euros at a fixed rate of 4.867%.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Bond issues made by Genzyme Corp. comprise:

        The line "Other borrowings" mainly includes:comprises:

        In order to manage its liquidity needs for current operations, the Group now has:

        The Group also has two commercial paper programs, of €6 billion in France and $10U.S.$10 billion in the United States. In 2012,2014, only the U.S. program was used, with an average drawdown of €2.3€2.1 billion and a maximum drawdown of €3.3€3.1 billion. Nothing was drawn down under either of these programs asAs of December 31, 2012.


Table2014, neither of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
those programs was drawn down.

        The financing in place as of December 31, 20122014 at the level of the holding company (which manages most of the Group's financing needs centrally) is not subject to any financial covenants, and contains no clauses linking credit spreads or fees to the credit rating.

c)    Debt by maturity, at value on redemption


  
 Current
 Non-current
    Current Non-current  

  
  
   
December 31, 2012
(€ million)
 Total
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
and later

 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
and later

 
 
 
Bond issues 12,395 2,509 3,094 710 2,637 750 2,695  13,422 843 2,735 750 1,985 800 6,309  
Other bank borrowings 1,472 994 5 6 7 434 26  841 355 16 437 17 7 9  
Commercial paper        
Finance lease obligations 78 13 13 14 13 14 11  62 15 15 16 10  6  
Other borrowings 55 42     13  17 4     13  
Bank credit balances 254 254       319 319       
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt (164) (40)  (87)  (3) (34) (121)(89)(23)(1) (6)(2) 
 
Total debt 14,090 3,772 3,112 643 2,657 1,195 2,711 14,540 1,447 2,743 1,202 2,012 801 6,335  
 
Cash and cash equivalents (6,381) (6,381)       (7,341)(7,341)      
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge cash and cash equivalents 2 2       (7)(7)      
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 7,711 (2,607) 3,112 643 2,657 1,195 2,711 7,192 (5,901)2,743 1,202 2,012 801 6,335  
 

 

 
  
 Current
 Non-current
 
 
  
  
   
December 31, 2011
(€ million)
 Total
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
and later

 
  
Bond issues  12,986  1,324  2,423  3,133  720  2,659  2,727 
Other bank borrowings  1,084  562  482  15  8  9  8 
Commercial paper (1)  695  695           
Finance lease obligations  92  12  14  13  14  14  25 
Other borrowings  76  62          14 
Bank credit balances  282  282           
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt  (258) (115) (58)   (85)    
  
Total debt  14,957  2,822  2,861  3,161  657  2,682  2,774 
  
Cash and cash equivalents  (4,124) (4,124)          
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge cash and cash equivalents  24  24           
  
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents  10,857  (1,278) 2,861  3,161  657  2,682  2,774 
  
(1)
Commercial paper had a maturity of no more than four months as of December 31, 2011.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 
  
 Current
 Non-Current
 
 
  
  
   
December 31, 2010
(€ million)
 Total
 2011
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
and later

 
  
Bond issues  5,971  92  420  1,638  1,200  321  2,300 
Other bank borrowings  1,173  402  203  555  6  7   
Commercial paper (1)  735  735           
Finance lease obligations  25  6  6  5  3  3  2 
Other borrowings  71  57          14 
Bank credit balances  273  273           
Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt  (192) 2  (73) (46)   (75)  
  
Total debt  8,056  1,567  556  2,152  1,209  256  2,316 
  
Cash and cash equivalents  (6,465) (6,465)          
  
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents  1,591  (4,898) 556  2,152  1,209  256  2,316 
  
(1)
Commercial paper had a maturity of no more than six months as of December 31, 2010.

        As of December 31, 2012, the main undrawn confirmed general-purpose credit facilities at holding company level were as follows:

Year of expiry
 Undrawn confirmed
credit facilities available
(€ million)

 
  
2013  3,000 
2015  250 
2017  6,750 
  
Total  10,000 
  

        As of December 31, 2012, no single counterparty represented more than 7% of undrawn confirmed credit facilities.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

   Current Non-current  
 

December 31, 2013
(€ million)


Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
and later

 
 
    

Bond issues

 12,837 3,111 688 2,588 750 1,088 4,612  
 

Other bank borrowings

 1,065 578 5 6 433 5 38  
 

Finance lease obligations

 63 13 13 13 13 8 3  
 

Other borrowings

 17 4     13  
 

Bank credit balances

 451 451       
 

Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt

 (119)(6)(82)(22)(2) (7) 
 

Total debt

14,314 4,151 624 2,585 1,194 1,101 4,659  
    

Cash and cash equivalents

 (8,257)(8,257)      
 

Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge cash and cash equivalents

         
 

Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents

6,057 (4,106)624 2,585 1,194 1,101 4,659  
    


   Current Non-current  
 

December 31, 2012
(€ million)


Total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
and later

 
 
    

Bond issues

 12,395 2,509 3,094 710 2,637 750 2,695  
 

Other bank borrowings

 1,472 994 5 6 7 434 26  
 

Finance lease obligations

 78 13 13 14 13 14 11  
 

Other borrowings

 55 42     13  
 

Bank credit balances

 254 254       
 

Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt

 (164)(40) (87) (3)(34) 
 

Total debt

14,090 3,772 3,112 643 2,657 1,195 2,711  
    

Cash and cash equivalents

 (6,381)(6,381)      
 

Interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge cash and cash equivalents

 2 2       
 

Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents

7,711 (2,607)3,112 643 2,657 1,195 2,711  
    

        As of December 31, 2014, the main undrawn confirmed general-purpose credit facilities at holding company level amounted to €8 billion, expiring in 2019.

        As of December 31, 2014, no single counterparty represented more than 6% of Sanofi's undrawn confirmed credit facilities.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

d)    Debt by interest rate, at value on redemption

        The tables below split debt, net of cash and cash equivalents between fixed and floating rate, and by maturity or contractual repricing date, as of December 31, 2012.2014. The figures shown are the value on redemption, before the effects of derivative instruments:


 December 31, 2012
 
 
(€ million)
 Total
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
and later

 Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
and later

 
 
 
Fixed-rate debt 11,506 1,884 2,526 623 2,637 1,175 2,661 12,983 758 2,712 1,178 1,235 794 6,306  
EUR 6,468             
USD 4,783             

of which EUR

 7,753              

of which USD

 4,978              
% fixed-rate 82%             89%              
 
Floating-rate debt (maturity based on contractual repricing date) 2,584 2,584      1,557 1,557       
EUR 241             
USD 1,493             

of which EUR

 900              

of which USD

 99              
% floating-rate 18%             11%              
 
Total debt 14,090 4,468 2,526 623 2,637 1,175 2,661 

Debt

14,540 2,315 2,712 1,178 1,235 794 6,306  
 
Cash and cash equivalents (6,379) (6,379)      (7,348)(7,348)      
EUR (5,050)             
USD (890)             

of which EUR

 (4,915)             

of which USD

 (1,214)             
% floating-rate 100%             100%              
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 7,711 (1,911) 2,526 623 2,637 1,175 2,661 7,192 (5,033)2,712 1,178 1,235 794 6,306  
 

        Since the financing of the Genzyme acquisition, in 2011, the Group has managed its net debt in two currencies,currencies: the euro and the U.S. dollar. The floating-rate portion of this debt exposes the Group to rises in interest rates, primarily in the Eonia and Euribor benchmark rates (for the euro) and in the U.S. Libor and Federal Fund Effective rates (for the U.S. dollar).

        To optimize the cost of debt and/or reduce the volatility of debt, Sanofi uses interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and (where appropriate) interest rate options that alter the fixed/floating rate split of debt and the maturity based on contractual repricing dates:

 

(€ million)

Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
and later

 
 
    

Fixed-rate debt

9,103 734 1,235 751 1,235  5,148  
    

of which EUR

 4,530              
 

of which USD

 4,567              
 

% fixed-rate

63%              
    

Floating-rate debt

5,437 5,437       
    

of which EUR

 4,368              
 

of which USD

 510              
 

% floating-rate

37%              
    

Debt

14,540 6,171 1,235 751 1,235  5,148  
    

Cash and cash equivalents

(7,348)(7,348)      
    

of which EUR

 (5,452)             
 

of which USD

 (1,214)             
 

% floating-rate

100%              
    

Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents

7,192 (1,177)1,235 751 1,235  5,148  
    

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        In order to reduce the amount and/or volatility of the cost of debt, the Group has contracted derivative instruments (interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps and interest rate options). These have the effect of altering the fixed/floating split and the maturity based on contractual repricing dates:

 
 December 31, 2012
 
  
(€ million)
 Total
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
and later

 
  
Fixed-rate debt  6,819  1,842  947  623  1,137  375  1,895 
EUR  2,411                   
USD  4,400                   
% fixed-rate  48%                   
  
Floating-rate debt  7,271  7,271           
EUR  4,639                   
USD  1,876                   
% floating-rate  52%                   
  
Total debt  14,090  9,113  947  623  1,137  375  1,895 
  
Cash and cash equivalents  (6,379) (6,379)          
EUR  (5,920)                  
USD  (20)                  
% floating-rate  100%                   
  
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents  7,711  2,734  947  623  1,137  375  1,895 
  

        The table below shows the fixed/floating rate split at value on redemption value after taking account of derivative instruments as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010:2012:

(€ million)
 2011
 %
 2010
 %
 2013 % 2012 %  
 
Fixed-rate debt 6,726 45% 5,350 66%  8,323 58% 6,819 48%  
Floating-rate debt 6,299 42% 2,706 34%  5,991 42% 7,271 52%  
Capped-rate debt 1,932 13%   
 
Total debt 14,957 100% 8,056 100% 

Debt

14,314 100% 14,090 100%  
 
Cash and cash equivalents (4,100)   (6,465)    (8,257)  (6,379)   
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 10,857   1,591   6,057   7,711    
 

        The weighted average interest rate on debt as of December 31, 20122014 was 3.0%2.8% before derivative instruments and 2.4%2.3% after derivative instruments. All cash and cash equivalents were invested at an average rate of 0.3%0.7% as of December 31, 2012.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
2014.

        Based on the Group's level of debt, and taking account of derivative instruments in place as of December 31, 2012,The projected full-year sensitivity to movements in market interest rates over a full year would be as follows in the year ending December 31, 2013:

Change in 3-month Euribor interest rate assumptions
 Impact on pre-tax
net income
(€ million)

 Impact on income/(expense)
recognized directly in
equity, before tax
(€ million)

 
  
                        +100 bp  (10) (3)
                          +25 bp  (2) (1)
  -25 bp  2  1 
-100 bp  10  3 
  

e) Debt,rate fluctuations of Sanofi's debt, net of cash and cash equivalents for 2015 is as follows:

 

Change in EUR, USD and CHF short-term interest rates

Impact on pre-tax
net income
(€ million)


 
Impact on pre-tax income/(expense)
recognized directly in equity
(€ million)


 
 
    

+100 bp

 19 11  
 

+25 bp

 5 3  
 

-25 bp

 (5)(3) 
 

-100 bp

 (19)(11) 
 

e)    Debt by currency, at value on redemption

        The table below shows debt, net of cash and cash equivalents by currency at December 31, 2012,2014, before and after derivative instruments contracted to convert third-partythird party debt into the functional currency of the borrower entity:


 December 31, 2012
 
 
(€ million)
 Before derivative
instruments

 After derivative
instruments

 Before
derivative instruments

 
After
derivative instruments

 
 
 
EUR 1,659 1,129  3,738 3,446  
USD 5,386 6,256  3,863 3,863  

CHF

 244 (1) 

JPY

 (537)  
BRL 368 368  156 156  
CHF 244  
JPY 93  
Other currencies (39) (42) (272)(272) 
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 7,711 7,711 7,192 7,192  
 

        The table below shows debt, net of cash and cash equivalents by currency at December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, after derivative instruments contracted to convert third-partythird party debt into the functional currency of the borrower entity:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 2013 2012  
 
EUR 3,084 1,581  (455)1,129  
USD 7,717 37  6,207 6,256  
Other currencies 56 (27) 305 326  
 
Debt, net of cash and cash equivalents 10,857 1,591 6,057 7,711  
 

f) Market value of debt, net of cash and cash equivalents

        The market value of debt, net of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012 was €8,566 million (versus €11,596 million as of December 31, 2011 and €1,887 million as of December 31, 2010); this compares with a value on redemption of €7,711 million as of December 31, 2012 (versus €10,857 million as of December 31, 2011 and €1,591 million as of December 31, 2010).


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

f)     Market value of debt

        The market value of debt, net of cash and cash equivalents and of derivatives, amounted to €7,730 million as of December 31, 2014 (versus €6,224 million as of December 31, 2013 and €8,297 million as of December 31, 2012). This compares with a value on redemption of €7,192 million as of December 31, 2014 (compared with €6,057 million as of December 31, 2013 and €7,711 million as of December 31, 2012).

        The fair value of debt is determined by reference to quoted market prices at the balance sheet date in the case of quoted instruments (level 1 in the IFRS 7 hierarchy, see Note D.16.), and by reference to the fair value of interest rate and currency derivatives used to hedge debt (level 2 in the IFRS 7 hierarchy, see Note D.16.).

g)    Future contractual cash flows relating to debt and debt hedging instruments

        The table below shows the amount of future contractual undiscounted cash flows (principal and interest) relating to debt and to derivative instruments designated as hedges of debt as of December 31, 2012:debt:


 December 31, 2012
    Contractual cash flows by period  
 

 Contractual cash flows by maturity
 
 
(€ million)
 Total
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
and later

 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
and later

 
 
 
Debt 15,590 4,047 3,421 882 2,855 1,314 3,071 16,199 1,702 3,080 1,422 2,216 1,003 6,776  

– principal

 13,988 3,667 3,124 637 2,650 1,192 2,718 

– interest (1)

 1,602 380 297 245 205 122 353 

• principal

 14,464 1,348 2,771 1,196 2,007 804 6,338  

• interest(1)

 1,735 354 309 226 209 199 438  
Net cash flows related to derivative instruments (307) (88) (84) (54) (50) (13) (18)(217)(71)(72)(33)(21)(19)(1) 
 
Total 15,283 3,959 3,337 828 2,805 1,301 3,053 15,982 1,631 3,008 1,389 2,195 984 6,775  
 
(1)
Interest cash flows are estimated on the basis of forward interest rates applicable as of December 31, 2012.2014.

        Future contractual cash flows are shown on the basis of the carrying amount in the balance sheet at the reporting date, without reference to any subsequent management decision that might materially alter the structure of the Group's debt or its hedging policy.

        Maturities used for credit facility drawdowns are those of the facility, not the drawdown.

The tables below show the amount of future contractual undiscounted cash flows (principal and interest) relating to debt and to derivative instruments designated as hedges of debt as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010:2012:


 December 31, 2011
    Contractual cash flows by period  
 

 Contractual cash flows by maturity
 
 
(€ million)
 Total
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
and later

 

December 31, 2013
(€ million)


Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
and later

 
 
 
Debt 16,726 3,193 3,184 3,426 877 2,852 3,194 15,891 4,457 930 2,859 1,367 1,258 5,020  

– principal

 14,748 2,783 2,814 3,134 639 2,654 2,724 

– interest (1)

 1,978 410 370 292 238 198 470 

• principal

 14,245 4,096 633 2,601 1,191 1,096 4,628  

• interest(1)

 1,646 361 297 258 176 162 392  
Net cash flows related to derivative instruments (231) (72) (66) (48) (21) (28) 4 (203)(85)(56)(52)(14)(3)7  
 
Total 16,495 3,121 3,118 3,378 856 2,824 3,198 15,688 4,372 874 2,807 1,353 1,255 5,027  
 
(1)
Interest cash flows are estimated on the basis of forward interest rates applicable as of December 31, 2011.2013.



 December 31, 2010
    Contractual cash flows by period  
 

 Contractual cash flows by maturity
 
 
(€ million)
 Total
 2011
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
and later

 

December 31, 2012
(€ million)


Total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
and later

 
 
 
Debt 9,354 1,699 875 2,418 1,360 462 2,540 15,590 4,047 3,421 882 2,855 1,314 3,071  

– principal

 8,150 1,447 632 2,200 1,208 347 2,316 

– interest (1)

 1,204 252 243 218 152 115 224 

• principal

 13,988 3,667 3,124 637 2,650 1,192 2,718  

• interest(1)

 1,602 380 297 245 205 122 353  
Net cash flows related to derivative instruments (229) (5) (83) (49) 3 (89) (6)(307)(88)(84)(54)(50)(13)(18) 
 
Total 9,125 1,694 792 2,369 1,363 373 2,534 15,283 3,959 3,337 828 2,805 1,301 3,053  
 
(1)
Interest cash flows are estimated on the basis of forward interest rates applicable as of December 31, 2010.2012.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.18. Liabilities related to business combinations and non-controlling interestsLIABILITIES RELATED TO BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND TO NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

        For a description of the nature of the liabilities reported in the line itemLiabilities related to business combinations and to non-controlling interests, refer to Note B.8.5. The principal acquisitions are described in Note D.1.

        The liabilities related to business combinations and to non-controlling interests shown in the table below are level 3 instruments under the IFRS 7 fair value hierarchy (see Note D.16.), except for the CVRs issued in connection with the acquisition of Genzyme, which are level 1 instruments.

Movements in liabilities related to business combinations and to non-controlling interests were as follows:are shown below:


 Liabilities related to business combinations
 
 
(€ million)
 Liabilities
related to
non-controlling
interests (1)

 CVRs issued in
connection with
the acquisition
of Genzyme (2)

 Bayer
contingent
consideration
arising from
the Genzyme
acquisition

 Other
 Total (6)
 Liabilities related
to non-controling
interests(1)


 
CVRs issued in
connection with
the acquisition
of Genzyme(2)



 
Bayer contingent
consideration
arising from the
acquisition of
Genzyme




 
Other Total(5)  
 
Balance at January 1, 2011 134   352 486 

Balance at January 1, 2012

133 268 694 461 1,556  
 
New business combinations  481 585 75 1,141  64   18 82  
Payments made  (2) (53) (44) (99)  (54)(101)(33)(188) 
Fair value remeasurements through profit or loss (including unwinding of discount)  (211) 127 69 (15)

Fair value remeasurements through profit or loss: gain/(loss) (including unwinding of discount)

  127 44 21 192  
Other movements (4)   (5) (9) (5)  (154)(159) 
Currency translation differences 3  35 14 52 
 
Balance at December 31, 2011 133 268 694 461 1,556 
 
New business combinations 64   18 82 
Payments made  (54)(3) (101) (33) (188)
Fair value remeasurements through profit or loss (including unwinding of discount) (4)  127 44 21 192 
Other movements (5)   (154)(5) (159)
Currency translation differences  (20) (5) (8) (33)  (20)(5)(8)(33) 
 
Balance at December 31, 2012 192 321 632 305 1,450 192 321 632 305 1,450  
 

New business combinations

 1    1  

Payments made

 (39)(6)(24)(34)(103) 

Fair value remeasurements through profit or loss:
gain/(loss) (including unwinding of discount)

  (246)60 (128)(314) 

Other movements

 (6)  (82)(88) 

Currency translation differences

  (10)(18)(10)(38) 

Balance at December 31, 2013

148 59 650 51 908  

New business combinations

 43    43  

Payments made

 (1)(1)(3)(7)(3)(12) 

Fair value remeasurements through profit or loss:
gain/(loss) (including unwinding of discount)(4)

  82 238 (17)303  

Other movements

 (19)   (19) 

Currency translation differences

 7 14 15 5 41  

Balance at December 31, 2014

178 154 896 36 1,264  
(1)
PutIncludes put options granted to non-controlling interests and commitment to future buyout of non-controlling interests held by BMS.
(2)
Based on the quoted market price per CVR of $1.70U.S.$0.79 as of December 31, 2012 and $1.202014, U.S.$0.34 as of December 31, 2011.2013 and U.S.$1.70 as of December 31, 2012.
(3)
Repurchase of 401.9 million CVRs ($70(U.S.$0.9 million) via a public tender offer..
(4)
Amounts reported in the income statement line itemFair value remeasurement of contingent consideration liabilities., corresponding mainly to unrealized gains and losses.
(5)
Reversal of the contingent consideration relating to the Fovea acquisition (see description below).
(6)
Portion due after more than one year: €1,133 million as of December 31, 2014 (€884 million as of December 31, 2013, €1,350 million as of December 31, 2012 (versus €1,336 million as of December 31, 2011 and €388 million as of December 31, 2010)2012); portion due within less than one year: €131 million as of December 31, 2014 (€24 million as of December 31, 2013 and €100 million as of December 31, 2012 (versus €220 million as of December 31, 2011 and €98 million as of December 31, 2010)2012).

        The Bayer contingent consideration liability was assumed on the acquisition of Genzyme in 2011.

        In a business combination completed in May 2009, prior to Sanofi's acquisition of control over Genzyme, Genzyme acquired from Bayer Schering Pharma A.G. (Bayer) the worldwide development and marketing rights to alemtuzumab (under the brand name LemtradaTMLemtrada®), a molecule currently under development for multiple sclerosis, as well as the


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

rights to the products Campath®, Fludara® and Leukine®. In exchange, Bayer is entitled to receive the following payments:


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        The fair value of thisthe liability was measured at €896 million as of December 31, 2014, versus €650 million as of December 31, 2013 and €632 million as of December 31, 2012, compared2012.

        The fair value of the Bayer liability is determined by applying the above contractual terms to sales projections which have been weighted to reflect the probability of success, and discounted. The fair value of the liability takes account of the marketing approval obtained for Lemtrada® in the United States. If the discount rate were to fall by one percentage point, the fair value of the Bayer liability would increase by approximately 4%.

        In 2013, following in-depth analysis of the risk/benefit profile and consultations with €694the FDA, Sanofi decided to suspend all clinical trials on fedratinib (SAR302503), and to abandon plans to seek regulatory approval. As a result, the TargeGen contingent consideration liability was reversed through profit or loss, in accordance with IFRS 3 (see Note D.5.); this liability amounted to €156 million as of December 31, 2011.2012.

        As of December 31, 2012, the other liabilities related to business combinations mainly comprised contingent consideration related to the acquisitions of TargeGen (€156 million, versus €159 million as of December 31, 2011 and €94 million as of December 31, 2010) and of BiPar (€73 million, versus €74 million as of December 31, 2011 and €70 million as of December 31, 2010). Having reviewed the resultsFollowing discontinuation of the Phase IIb trial of FOV-1101, which led to a reassessment of its commercial prospects, Sanofi decided to pursue development ofinternal experimental programs on iniparib, and given that no goodwill arose when this product via a sub-licensing agreement with an as yet unidentified third party. Consequently,business combination was initially recognized in 2009, the Fovea contingent consideration liability (€151 million as ofrelated to BiPar was reversed through profit or loss in the year ended December 31, 2011, €155 million as of December 31, 2010) was reversed during 2012 as an adjustment to goodwill,2013, in accordance with the pre-revision IFRS 3.3 (see Note D.5.). This liability amounted to €73 million as of December 31, 2012.

        The table below sets forth the maximum amount of contingent consideration payable and firm commitments to buy out non-controlling interests:

   December 31, 2012 
  
   Payments due by period 
  
(€ million)  Total  Less than
1 year
  From 1 to
3 years
  From 3 to
5 years
  More than
5 years
 
  
Commitments relating to contingent consideration in connection with business combinations (1) and buyouts of non-controlling interests (2)  4,993  341  1,135  560  2,957 
  

   Payments due by period  
 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


Total Less than
1 year

 
From 1 to
3 years

 
From 3
to 5 years

 
More than
5 years

 
 
    

Commitments relating to contingent consideration in connection with business combinations(1) and buyouts of non-controlling interests(2)

 4,745 94 889 943 2,819  
 
(1)
Includes €1.7€1.8 billion for the Bayer contingent consideration (versus €1.9€1.6 billion as of December 31, 2011)31,2013) and €2.5€2.3 billion for the CVRs issued in connection with the acquisition of Genzyme acquisition (versus €2.9€2.1 billion as of December 31, 2011)2013).
(2)
This line does not include put options granted to non-controlling interests.

        These commitments amounted to €5,578€4,416 million as of December 31, 2011.2013. The reductionincrease in the commitmentamount of commitments during 20122014 was mainly attributabledue to the repurchaseeffect of 40 million CVRs.foreign exchange rates on commitments denominated in U.S. dollars.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.19. Provisions and other liabilitiesPROVISIONS AND OTHER LIABILITIES

        Provisions and other non-current liabilities break down as follows:

(€ million)
 Provisions for
pensions and
other benefits
(D.19.1.)

 Restructuring
provisions
(D.19.2.)

 Other
provisions
(D.19.3.)

 Other
non-current
liabilities

 Total
 Provisions for pensions and other benefits
(D.19.1.)

 
Provisions for
other long-term
benefits


 
Restructuring
provisions
(D.19.2.)


 
Other
Provisions
(D.19.3.)


 
Other
non-current
liabilities


 
Total  
 
January 1, 2010 4,342 257 3,533 104 8,236 

Balance at January 1, 2012

4,425 481 1,182 4,158 114 10,360  

Increases in provisions and other liabilities

 225(1)127 554 744(2) 1,650  

Provisions utilized

 (733)(1)(70)(24)(240)(4)(1,071) 

Reversals of unutilized provisions

 (182)(1)(4)(5)(636)(3) (827) 

Transfers

 (94)(4)(13)(4)(292)(4)(324)(11)(734) 

Net interest related to employee benefits, and unwinding of discount

 185 13 45 42  285  

Currency translation differences

 (23)(3)1 (33)(1)(59) 

Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit plans(5)

 1,439     1,439  

Balance at December 31, 2012

5,242 531 1,461 3,711 98 11,043  
 
Changes in scope of consolidation 21  27  48     17  17  
Increases in provisions and other liabilities 442 731 857 (2) 11 2,041 
Provisions utilized (587) (65) (386) (41) (1,079)
Reversals of unutilized provisions (82) (56) (259)(3)  (397)
Transfers(1) (305) 119 81 (7) (112)
Unwinding of discount  27 34 1 62 
Unrealized gains and losses   (35) 33 (2)
Currency translation differences 96 4 108 5 213 
Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit plans (4) 316    316 
 
December 31, 2010 4,243 1,017 3,960 106 9,326 
 
Merial (5) 64  48 4 116 
Changes in scope of consolidation 35  150 20 205 
Increases in provisions and other liabilities 414 500 470 (2) 15 1,399 
Provisions utilized (510) (29) (138)  (677)
Reversals of unutilized provisions (97) (19) (363)(3)  (479)
Transfers (1) (3) (327) (23) (9) (362)
Unwinding of discount 1 38 40  79 
Unrealized gains and losses   1 (27) (26)
Currency translation differences 68 2 13 5 88 
Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit plans (4) 677    677 
 
December 31, 2011 4,892 1,182 4,158 114 10,346 
 
Increases in provisions and other liabilities 449 554 744 (2)  1,747  243(1)83 153 373(2)4 856  
Provisions utilized (803) (24) (240) (4) (1,071) (724)(1)(58)(74)(163) (1,019) 
Reversals of unutilized provisions (186) (5) (636)(3)  (827) (3)(1) (29)(669)(3) (701) 
Transfers(1)/(6) (108) (292) (324) (11) (735)
Unwinding of discount  45 42  87 

Transfers

 6 (11)(480)(196)(1)(682) 

Net interest related to employee benefits, and unwinding of discount

 150 9 32 40  231  

Unrealized gains and losses

    (7) (7) 
Currency translation differences (26) 1 (33) (1) (59) (80)(11)(2)(98)(3)(194) 
Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit plans (4) 1,548    1,548 
 
December 31, 2012 5,766 1,461 3,711 98 11,036 

Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit plans(5)

 (809)    (809) 
 

Balance at December 31, 2013

4,025 543 1,061 3,008 98 8,735  

Changes in scope of consolidation

    1  1  

Increases in provisions and other liabilities

 225(1)145 140 352(2)35 897  

Provisions utilized

 (486)(1)(69)(13)(203) (771) 

Reversals of unutilized provisions

 (52)(1) (8)(207)(3) (267) 

Transfers

 31 (6)(372)(28) (375) 

Net interest related to employee benefits, and unwinding of discount

 133 9 22 50  214  

Unrealized gains and losses

    1  1  

Currency translation differences

 134 28 5 102 11 280  

Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit plans(5)

 863     863  

Balance at December 31, 2014

4,873 650 835 3,076 144 9,578  
(1)
ThisAs regards provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits, the "increases in provisions" line includes transfers between currentcorresponds to rights vesting in employees during the period and non-current provisions,past service cost; the "provisions utilized" line corresponds to contributions paid into pension funds and in 2010plan settlements; and the reclassification"reversals of social security charges and "Fillon" levies on early retirement plans in France (see Note D.19.1.).unutilized provisions" line corresponds to plan curtailments.
(2)
Amounts charged during the period mainly comprise provisions to cover tax exposures in various countries; changes to estimates of future expenditure on environmental risks; and recognition of the provision relating to the ramipril litigation in 2012 (see Note D.26.).
(3)
Reversals relate mainly to provisions for tax exposures, reversed either because (i) the risk exposure became time-barred during the reporting period or (ii) theprocedures with tax dispute was settledauthorities in various countries were resolved during the period and the outcome provedwith a more favorable outcome than expected for Sanofi.initially anticipated.
(4)
Amounts recognized as other comprehensive income (see Note D.15.7.).
(5)
This line includes the provisions and other non-current liabilities of Merial, previously presentedIncludes €(101) million inLiabilities related to assets held 2012 for sale or exchange, which were reclassified following the announcement of the decision to maintain two separate entities (Merial and Intervet/Schering-Plough) operating independently (see note D.2).
(6)
Includes a €101 million transfertransfers to restructuring provisions following the announcement of measures to adapt the Group's resources in France (see Note D.19.2.).
(5)
Amounts recognized inOther comprehensive income (see Note D.15.7.).

        Other current liabilities are described in Note D.19.4.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.19.1. Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits

        The Group offers its employees pension plans and its subsidiaries haveother post-employment benefit plans. The specific features of these plans (benefit formulas, fund investment policy and fund assets held) vary depending on the applicable laws and regulations in each country where the employees work. These employee benefits are accounted for in accordance with the revised IAS 19 (see Note B.23.).

        The Group's pension obligations in four major countries represented over 91% of the total value of the defined-benefit liability and over 90% of the total value of plan assets as of December 31, 2014. The features of the principal defined-benefit plans in each of these four countries are described below.

France

Lump-sum retirement benefit plan

        All employees working for Sanofi in France are entitled on retirement to a significantlump-sum, the amount of which depends both on their length of service in the Group and on the rights guaranteed by collective and internal agreements. The employee's final salary is taken into account when calculating the amount of these lump-sum retirement benefits. These plans represent approximately 31% of the Group's total obligations in France.

Defined-benefit pension plans

        These plans provide benefits from the date of retirement. Employees must fulfil a number of criteria to be eligible for these benefits. All but one of these plans are closed to new entrants (closed plans). These plans represent approximately 67% of the Group's total obligations in France.

Germany

Top-up defined-benefit pension scheme

        This pension scheme is wholly funded by the employer (there are no employee contributions) via a Contractual Trust Agreement (CTA), under which benefits are estimated on the basis of an average career salary. Employees are entitled to an annuity under this scheme if their salary exceeds the social security ceiling. The amount of the pension is calculated by reference to a range of vesting rates corresponding to salary bands. The scheme also includes disability and death benefits; it represents approximately 72% of the Group's total obligations in Germany.

Multi-employer plan (Pensionkasse)

        This is a defined-benefit plan that is treated as a defined-contribution plan, in accordance with the accounting policies described in Note B.23. At present, contributions cover the level of annuities. Only the portion relating to the future revaluation of the annuities is included in the defined-benefit pension obligation. The obligation relating to this revaluation amounted to €745 million as of December 31, 2014, versus €638 million as of December 31, 2013 and €655 million as of December 31, 2012. This plan represents approximately 20% of the Group's total defined-benefit obligations in Germany.

United States

Defined-benefit pension plans

        In the United States, there are two types of defined-benefit schemes, "qualified" and "non-qualified":


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Healthcare cover and life insurance

        Group companies provide some eligible employees with healthcare cover and life insurance during the retirement period (the Group's contributions are capped at a specified level). This plan represents approximately 21% of the Group's total obligations in the United States.

United Kingdom

Defined-benefit pension plans

        Sanofi operates a number of pension plans coveringin the majority of their employees.United Kingdom that reflect the Group's past acquisitions. The specific features (benefit formulas, funding policiestwo most significant arrangements are both defined-benefit pension plans (the Sanofi plan and types of assets held)the Genzyme Limited plan), under which an annuity is paid from the retirement date. This annuity is calculated on the basis of the employee's length of service and final salary (or salary on the date when the employee leaves the Group). These plans vary depending on laws and regulationsalso offer additional benefits in the particular countryevent of illness or death of a plan member.

        The rates used for the vesting of rights vary from member to member. For most members, rights vest at the rate of 1.25% or 1.50% of final salary for each qualifying year of service giving entitlement. The notional retirement age varies according to the category to which the member belongs, but in most cases retirement is at age 65. Members may choose to retire before or after the notional retirement age (60 years), in which case the employees work. Several of these plans are defined-benefit plans and cover some membersamount of the Boardannual pension is adjusted to take account of Directors as well as employees.the revised estimate of the retirement phase. Pensions are usually indexed to the Retail Price Index (RPI). Members pay a fixed-percentage contribution into their pension plan (the percentage varies according to the employee category), and the employer tops up the contribution to the required amount. These plans represent approximately 99% of the Group's total obligations in the United Kingdom.

Actuarial assumptions used to measure the Group's obligations

        Actuarial valuations of the Group's benefit obligations were computed by management with assistance from external actuaries as of December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010.2012.

        These calculations incorporatewere based on the following elements:

assumptions:

Inflation rate
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  

– Euro zone

  2%  2%  2% 

– United States

  2.75%  2.75%  2.75% 

– United Kingdom

  2.8%  3%  3.25% 
  

 
 Pensions and other long-term benefits
 Other post-employment
benefits

 
  
 
 Year ended December 31,
 Year ended December 31,
 
  
Discount rate
 2012
 2011
 2010
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  
Weighted average for all regions:  3.31%  4.61%  4.97%  3.78%  4.62%  5.45% 

– Euro zone

  2.25% or 3% (1) 4.25% or 4.75%  4.25% or 4.75%  3%  4.75%  4.75% 

– United States

  3.75%  4.5%  5.5%  3.75%  4.5%  5.5% 

– United Kingdom

  4.25%  5%  5.5%  4.25%  5%  5.5% 
  

 2014  2013  2012  
 

France Germany USA UK France Germany USA UK France Germany USA UK  
    

Discount rate(1) / (2)

 1.25%
or 1.75%

1.25%
or 1.75%

 
3.75% 3.75% 2.50%
or 3.25%
 2.50%
or 3.25%
 4.75% 4.50% 2.25%
or 3.00%
 2.25%
or 3.00%
 3.75% 4.25%  
 

General inflation rate

 1.75%1.75% 2.50% 3.20% 2.00% 2.00% 2.50% 3.35% 2.00% 2.00% 2.75% 2.80%  
 

Pension benefit indexation

 1.25 to
2.25%

1.75%  3.20% 3.00% to
5.00%
 2.00%  3.35% 3.00% to
5.00%
 2.00%  1.25%  
 

Healthcare cost inflation rate

 2.00% — &zwsp;(3)6.80% 1.25% 2.00% (3)7.00% 1.25% 2.00% (3)7.20% 3.50%  
 

Retirement age

 61 to 6762 55 to 70 60 61 to 67 62 55 to 70 60 61 to 67 62 55 to 70 60  
 

Mortality table

 TGH/
TGF 05

Heubeck RT
2005 G

 
RP2014
G. Scale
MP2014


 
SAPS TGH/
TGF 05
 Heubeck RT
2005 G
 RP2000
Proj BB
 SAPS TGH/
TGF 05
 Heubeck RT
2005 G
 RP2000
Proj 2020
 SAPS  
 
(1)
Depends on the term of the plan: 2.25% medium-term, 3% long-term.

The discount rates used are based on market rates for high quality corporate bonds with a duration close to the expected benefit payments ofunder the plans. The benchmarks used to determine these discount rates were the same in 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010.

        Sensitivity analysis2012.

(2)
Rate depends on the duration of pension plansthe plan (7 to 10 years and more than 10 years, respectively).
(3)
No post-employment healthcare benefits are provided in Germany.

Weighted average duration of obligation for pensions and other post-employmentlong-term benefits in principal countries

        The table below shows the duration of the Group's obligations in the principal countries shows that a 0.5% reduction in discount rates would increase the Group's obligation by approximately €789 million, of which approximately €248 million would relate to the United Kingdom, €214 million to Germany, €168 million to France and €159 million to the United States.countries:

 2014  2013  2012  
 

(in years)

France Germany USA UK France Germany USA UK France Germany USA UK  
    

Weighted average duration of main countries

 1414 14 17 14 13 13 17 13 13 14 18  
 

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Sensitivity analysis

 
 Pensions and other long-term benefits
 Other post-employment benefits
 
  
 
 Year ended December 31,
 Year ended December 31,
 
  
Long-term rate of return on plan assets
 2012
 2011
 2010
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  
Range of rates of return  1.7% - 12.5%  1.7% - 14%  2% - 13.5%  6.75%  7.5%  8% 
  
Weighted average for all regions:  6.24%  6.48%  6.86%  6.75%  7.5%  8% 

– Germany

  6.25%  6.25%  6.75%       

– United States

  6.75%  7.5%  8%  6.75%  7.5%  8% 

– United Kingdom

  6%  6.25%  6.5%       
  

        The average long-term rates of return on plan assets were determined on the basis of actual long-term rates of return in the financial markets. These returns vary according to the asset category (equities, bonds, real estate, other). As a general rule, Sanofi applies the risk premium concept in assessing the return on equities relative to bond yields.

        An analysis oftable below shows the sensitivity of the benefit costGroup's obligations for pensions and other post-employment benefits to changes in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets shows that a 0.5% reduction in the rate of return would increase the benefit cost by approximately €34 million.

        The weighted average allocation of funds invested in Group pension plans is shown below:key actuarial assumptions:

 
 Funds invested
 
  
Asset category (percentage)
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  
Equities  48%  47%  50% 
Bonds  44%  49%  47% 
Real estate  4%  2%  2% 
Cash and other  4%  2%  1% 
  
Total  100%  100%  100% 
  

Pensions and other post-employment benefits, by country

(€ million)
Measurement of defined-benefit obligation


Change in
assumption

FranceGermanyUSAUK

Discount rate

-0,50%+184+263+201+264

General inflation rate

+0.50%+251+343+3+175

Pension benefits indexation

+0.50%+170+332+178

Healthcare cost inflation rate

+0.50%+3+17

Mortality table

+1 year+67+107+60+78

        The target allocation of funds invested as of December 31, 2012 is not materially different from the actual allocation as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below reconciles the net obligation in respect of the Group's pension plans and other employee benefitspost-employment benefit plans with the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements:

 
 Pensions and other
long-term benefits

 Other post-employment
benefits (healthcare cover)

 
  
(€ million)
 2012
 2011
 2010 (1)
 2012
 2011
 2010 (1)
 
  
Valuation of obligation:                   
Beginning of period  10,475  9,559  8,924  470  429  376 
Merial    207      1   
Service cost  262  265  240  24  13  14 
Contributions from plan members      5       
Interest cost  462  458  454  21  22  22 
Actuarial (gain)/loss  1,911  366  593  53  23  22 
Plan amendments  6    15  1     
Currency translation differences  (17) 169  259  (9) 13  27 
Plan curtailments/settlements  (455) (80) (69)   (8) (13)
Changes in scope of consolidation, transfers  (18) 105  (283)(2)     1 
Benefits paid  (605) (574) (579) (21) (23) (20)
  
Obligation at end of period  12,021  10,475  9,559  539  470  429 
  
Fair value of plan assets:                   
Beginning of period  5,995  5,661  4,876  50  51  44 
Merial    144         
Expected return on plan assets  378  367  347  3  3 ��4 
Difference between actual and expected return on plan assets  357  (290) 252  3  (2) 3 
Currency translation differences    113  185  (1) 1  4 
Contributions from plan members  5  9  5       
Employer's contributions  582  331  400    3  1 
Plan settlements  (166) (4) (1)      
Changes in scope of consolidation, transfers  (10) 73  5       
Benefits paid  (401) (409) (408) (4) (6) (5)
  
Fair value of plan assets at end of period  6,740  5,995  5,661  51  50  51 
  
Net amount shown in the balance sheet:                   
Net obligation  5,281  4,480  3,898  488  420  378 
Unrecognized past service cost  (15) (23) (45) 6  8  7 
Effect of asset ceiling    1  1       
  
Net amount shown in the balance sheet  5,266  4,458  3,854  494  428  385 
  
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet:                   
Pre-funded obligations (see Note D.7.)  (6) (6) (4)      
Obligations provided for (3)  5,272  4,464  3,858  494  428  385 
  
Net amount recognized  5,266  4,458  3,854  494  428  385 
  
Benefit cost for the period:                   
Service cost  257  256  240  24  13  14 
Interest cost  462  458  454  21  22  22 
Expected return on plan assets  (378) (367) (347) (3) (3) (4)
Amortization of past service cost  13  21  20  (1)    
Recognition of actuarial (gains)/losses  55  4  44       
Effect of plan curtailments  (229) (77) (69)   (8) (13)
Effect of plan settlements  (60) 1         
  
Benefit cost for the period  120  296  342  41  24  19 
  
(1)
Excluding Merial, for which the net amounts recognized in the balance sheet were presented as assets/liabilities held for sale or exchange as of December 31, 2010.
(2)
Includes a reduction of €322 million in respect of social security charges and "Fillon" levies due on early retirement plans in France, which were provided for as part of the pension obligation at December 31, 2009 but were reclassified as restructuring provisions at December 31, 2010; these provisions also include the portion relating to annuities (see Note D.19.2.).
(3)
Long-term benefits awarded to employees prior to retirement (mainly discretionary bonuses, long service awards and deferred compensation plans) amounted to €532 million at December 31, 2012, €483 million at December 31, 2011 and €445 million at December 31, 2010. The expense associated with these obligations totaled €125 million in 2012, €56 million in 2011, and €106 million in 2010.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        Actuarial gains and losses on pensions, other long-term and post-employment benefits break down as follows:

(€ million)
 2012
 2011
 2010
 2009
 2008
 
  
Actuarial gains/(losses) arising during the period (1)  (1,604) (681) (360) (207) (786)
  
Comprising:                

• gains/(losses) on experience adjustments

  319  (266) 169  531  (1,326)

• gains/(losses) on changes in assumptions (2)

  (1,923) (415) (529) (738) 540 
  
Breakdown of experience adjustments:                

• gains/(losses) on plan assets (3)

  360  (292) 255  553  (1,360)

• gains/(losses) on obligations

  (41) 26  (86) (22) 34 
  
Amount of obligations at the balance sheet date  12,560  10,945  9,988  9,300  8,110 
Fair value of plan assets at the balance sheet date  6,791  6,045  5,712  4,920  3,998 
  
(1)
Includes losses recognized in equity of €1,555 million in 2012, €677 million in 2011, and €316 million in 2010 (see Note D.15.7.), and losses recognized directly in profit or loss of €50 million in 2012, €4 million in 2011 and €44 million in 2010.
(2)
Changes in assumptions relate mainly to changes in discount rates.
(3)
Experience adjustments are due to trends in the financial markets.

        The net pre-tax actuarial loss recognized directly in equity (excluding associates and joint ventures) was €3,693 million at December 31, 2012, versus €2,145 million at December 31, 2011 and €1,459 million at December 31, 2010.

        At December 31, 2012, the present value of obligations in respect of pensions and other long-term benefits under wholly or partially funded plans was €9,672 million, and the present value of unfunded obligations was €2,349 million (versus €8,913 million and €1,562 million at December 31, 2011, and €7,589 million and €1,969 million at December 31, 2010, respectively).

        In Germany, Sanofi is a member of aPensionskasse multi-employer plan. This is a defined-benefit plan accounted for as a defined-contribution plan in accordance with the accounting policy described in Note B.23. Plan contributions cover the current level of annuities. However, the obligation arising from future increases in annuity rates is recognized as part of the overall pension obligation; it amounted to €655 million at December 31, 2012, versus €489 million at December 31, 2011 and €487 million at December 31, 2010.

        The table below shows the sensitivity of (i) the benefit cost recognized in the consolidated income statement, and (ii) the obligation in the consolidated balance sheet, to changes in healthcare costs associated with other post-employment benefits.

(€ million)
Sensitivity of
assumptions
2012

1% increase in healthcare costs

• Impact on benefit cost for the period

3

• Impact on obligation in the balance sheet

38
1% reduction in healthcare costs

• Impact on benefit cost for the period

(6)

• Impact on obligation in the balance sheet

(47)

 Pensions and other post-employment benefits  
 

(€ million)

2014 2013 2012  
    

Measurement of the obligation:

       
 

Beginning of period

 11,25112,014 10,447  
 

Current service cost

 214233 215  
 

Interest cost

 418384 470  
 

Actuarial losses/(gains) due to changes in demographic assumptions

 (25)13 78  
 

Actuarial losses/(gains) due to changes in financial assumptions

 1,618(555)1,827  
 

Actuarial losses/(gains) due to experience adjustments

 (30)30 3  
 

Plan amendments

 55 6  
 

Plan curtailments

 (16)(8)(214) 
 

Plan settlements specified in the terms of the plan

 (54)(62)(3) 
 

Plan settlements not specified in the terms of the plan

 (110) (224) 
 

Benefits paid

 (507)(547)(553) 
 

Changes in scope of consolidation and transfers

 (2)2 (15) 
 

Currency translation differences

 540(258)(23) 
 

Obligation at end of period

13,302 11,251 12,014  
    

Fair value of plan assets:

       
 

Beginning of period

 7,2416,778 6,029  
 

Interest income on plan assets

 285234 285  
 

Difference between actual return and interest income on plan assets

 700297 469  
 

Administration costs

 (11)(10)(10) 
 

Plan settlements specified in the terms of the plan

 (54)(62)(3) 
 

Plan settlements not specified in the terms of the plan

 (63) (163) 
 

Contributions from plan members

 55 5  
 

Employer's contributions

 354525 583  
 

Benefits paid

 (375)(348)(403) 
 

Changes in scope of consolidation and transfers

  (11) 
 

Currency translation differences

 406(178)(3) 
 

Fair value of plan assets at end of period

8,488 7,241 6,778  
    

Net amount shown in the balance sheet:

       
 

Net obligation

 4,8144,010 5,236  
 

Effect of asset ceiling

    
 

Net amount shown in balance sheet at end of period

4,814 4,010 5,236  
    

Amounts recognized in the balance sheet:

       
 

Pre-funded obligations (see Note D.7.)

 (59)(15)(6) 
 

Obligations provided for

 4,8734,025 5,242  
 

Net amount recognized at end of period

4,814 4,010 5,236  
    

Benefit cost for the period:

       
 

Current service cost

 214233 215  
 

Past service cost

 55 6  
 

Net interest (income)/cost

 133150 185  
 

(Gains)/losses on plan settlements not specified in the terms of the plan

 (47) (61) 
 

Actuarial (gains)/losses on plan curtailments

 (16)(8)(214) 
 

Contributions from plan members

 (5)(5)(5) 
 

Administration costs and taxes paid during the period

 1110 10  
 

Expense recognized directly in profit or loss

 295385 136  
 

Remeasurement of net defined-benefit (asset)/liability (actuarial gains and losses)

 863(809)1,439  
 

Expense/(gain) for the period

1,158 (424)1,575  
    

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The total costtables below show the Group's net liability in respect of pensionspension plans and other post-employment benefits which amounted to €161 million in 2012, is split as follows:by geographical region:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010 (1)

 
  
•  Cost of sales  122  117  121 
•  Research and development expenses  74  81  98 
•  Selling and general expenses  65  160  155 
•  Other operating (income)/expenses, net  (20) 43  51 
•  Financial expenses (2)  10    9 
•  Other gains and losses, and litigation (3)    (4)  
•  Restructuring costs  (90) (77) (73)(4)
  
Total  161  320  361 
  
(1)
Excluding Merial.
(2)
This line comprises actuarial gains and losses on deferred compensation plans funded by assets recognized under the fair value option (see Note D.7.). These actuarial gains and losses are offset by changes in the fair value of those assets.
(3)
Relates to the sale of Dermik (see Note D.28.)
(4)
Impact of plan curtailments following the redundancy programs announced in 2010 (see Note D.19.2.).

 Pensions and other post-employment benefits
by geographical region
  
 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Measurement of obligation

 2,522 3,809 2,819 2,996 1,156 13,302  
 

Fair value of plan assets

 865 2,207 1,837 2,745 834 8,488  
 

Net amount shown in balance sheet at end of period

1,657 1,602 982 251 322 4,814  
    

 The timing of estimated future benefit payments on unfunded pension and post-employment plans as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:

(€ million)
 Total
 Less than
1 year

 From 1 to
3 years

 From 3 to
5 years

 More than
5 years

 
  
Estimated payments  1,741  60  115  133  1,433 
  

 Pensions and other post-employment benefits
by geographical region
  
 

December 31, 2013
(€ million)


France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Measurement of obligation

 2,243 3,398 2,144 2,499 967 11,251  
 

Fair value of plan assets

 643 2,084 1,527 2,288 699 7,241  
 

Net amount shown in balance sheet at end of period

1,600 1,314 617 211 268 4,010  
    


 Pensions and other post-employment benefits
by geographical region
  
 

December 31, 2012
(€ million)


France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Measurement of obligation

 2,429 3,550 2,369 2,591 1,075 12,014  
 

Fair value of plan assets

 600 1,992 1,360 2,122 704 6,778  
 

Net amount shown in balance sheet at end of period

1,829 1,558 1,009 469 371 5,236  
    

        The table below shows the expected cash outflows on pensions,fair value of plan assets relating to the Group's pension and other long-term benefits and post-employment benefits over the next ten years:plans, split by asset category:

(€ million)
 Pensions and
other benefits

 
  
Estimated employer's contribution in 2013  268 
  
Estimated benefit payments:    
2013  651 
2014  602 
2015  602 
2016  624 
2017  680 
2018 to 2022  3,528 
  
 

2014 2013 2012  
    

Securities quoted in an active market

96.8% 97.8% 97.9%  
    

Cash and cash equivalents

 1.0% 0.7% 0.7%  
 

Equity instruments

 40.7% 43.9% 46.8%  
 

Bonds and similar instruments

 50.1% 48.1% 44.6%  
 

Real estate

 3.7% 3.5% 3.2%  
 

Derivatives

 (0.1)% 0.4% 0.4%  
 

Commodities

 1.1% 0.7%   
 

Other assets

 0.3% 0.5% 2.2%  
 

Other securities

3.2% 2.2% 2.1%  
    

Investment funds

 1.5% 1.6% 1.7%  
 

Insurance policies

 1.7% 0.6% 0.4%  
 

Total

100% 100% 100%  
    

        The Group has a long-term objective of maintaining or increasing the extent to which its obligations are covered by assets. To this end, the Group uses an asset-liability management strategy, matching plan assets to its pension obligations. This policy aims to ensure the best fit between the assets held on the one hand, and the associated liabilities and expected future payments to plan members on the other hand. To meet this aim, the Group operates a risk monitoring and management strategy (mainly focused on interest rate risk and inflation risk), while investing a growing proportion of assets in high-quality bonds with comparable maturities to those of the underlying obligations.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The Group did not alter its asset-liability management strategy or its key risk monitoring policy during 2014.

        The tables below show the service cost for the Group's pension and other post-employment benefit plans, by geographical region:

 Pensions and other post-employment benefits
by geographical region
  
 

(€ million)
Service cost for 2014


France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Current service cost

 72 35 50 17 40 214  
 

Past service cost

 1 4    5  
 

Net interest cost/(income) including administration costs and taxes paid during the period

 49 36 34 12 13 144  
 

(Gains)/losses on plan settlements not specified in the terms of the plan

 (19) (28)  (47) 
 

Actuarial (gains)/losses on plan curtailments

 (11)3   (8)(16) 
 

Contributions from plan members

    (1)(4)(5) 
 

Expense recognized directly in profit or loss

92 78 56 28 41 295  
    

Remeasurement of net defined-benefit (asset)/liability (actuarial gains and losses)

 175 338 225 60 65 863  
 

Expense/(gain) for the period

267 416 281 88 106 1,158  
    


 Pensions and other post-employment benefits
by geographical region
  
 

(€ million)
Service cost for 2013


France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Current service cost

 77 33 58 17 48 233  
 

Past service cost

 5     5  
 

Net interest cost/(income) including administration costs and taxes paid during the period

 51 40 33 22 14 160  
 

(Gains)/losses on plan settlements not specified in the terms of the plan

        
 

Actuarial (gains)/losses on plan curtailments

 (5)4   (7)(8) 
 

Contributions from plan members

    (1)(4)(5) 
 

Expense recognized directly in profit or loss

128 77 91 38 51 385  
    

Remeasurement of net defined-benefit (asset)/liability (actuarial gains and losses)

 (237)(179)(127)(210)(56)(809) 
 

Expense/(gain) for the period

(109)(102)(36)(172)(5)(424) 
    


 Pensions and other post-employment benefits
by geographical region
  
 

(€ million)
Service cost for 2012


France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Current service cost

 59 28 61 20 47 215  
 

Past service cost

   4  2 6  
 

Net interest cost/(income) including administration costs and taxes paid during the period

 73 47 40 22 13 195  
 

(Gains)/losses on plan settlements not specified in the terms of the plan

   (60) (1)(61) 
 

Actuarial (gains)/losses on plan curtailments

 (93)8 (124)(4)(1)(214) 
 

Contributions from plan members

    (2)(3)(5) 
 

Expense recognized directly in profit or loss

39 83 (79)36 57 136  
    

Remeasurement of net defined-benefit (asset)/liability (actuarial gains and losses)

 543 468 185 202 41 1,439  
 

Expense/(gain) for the period

582 551 106 238 98 1,575  
    

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        There were no significant events affecting the Group's pension and other post-employment benefit plans in 2014.

        The remeasurement of the net defined-benefit (asset)/liability (actuarial gains and losses) on pension and post-employment benefit plans breaks down as follows:

 

2014


 2013

 2012
 

(€ million)

 
France

 

Germany

 

USA

 

UK

 

France

 

Germany

 

USA

 

UK

 

France

 

Germany

 

USA

 

UK

 
 
    

Actuarial gains/(losses) arising
during the period(1)

 (175)(338)(225)(60)237 179 127 210 (543)(468)(185)(202) 
 

Comprising:

                      
 

Gains/(losses) on experience adjustments(2)

 132130 147 238 70 77 (47)138 47 193 87 72  
 

Gains/(losses) on demographic assumptions

 88 (62) 7  (106)101 (31)(5)(31)  
 

Gains/(losses) on financial assumptions

 (395)(468)(310)(298)160 102 280 (29)(559)(656)(241)(274) 
 
(1)
Gains and losses arising from changes in assumptions are due primarily to changes in the discount rate.
(2)
Experience adjustments are mainly due to the effect of trends in the financial markets on plan assets.

        The net post-tax actuarial loss (excluding associates and joint ventures) recognized directly in equity in the year ended December 31, 2014 was €3,548 million, compared with €2,687 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and €3,497 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

        The present value of the Group's wholly or partially funded obligations in respect of pension plans and other post-employment benefit plans as at December 31, 2014 was €11,933 million, compared with €10,214 million as of December 31, 2013 and €10,273 million as of December 31, 2012. The present value of the Group's unfunded obligations was €1,369 million as of December 31, 2014, versus €1,037 million as of December 31, 2013 and €1,741 million as of December 31, 2012.

        The total expense for pensions and other post-employment benefits for the year ended December 31, 2014, amounting to €295 million, was allocated between income statement line items as follows:

 

(€ million)

2014 2013 2012  
    

Cost of sales

 7379 60  
 

Research and development expenses

 4552 36  
 

Selling and general expenses

 108111 (4) 
 

Other operating (income)/expenses, net

 (56)(7)(60) 
 

Restructuring costs

 (8) (81) 
 

Financial expenses

 133150 185  
 

Total

295 385 136  
    

        The estimated amounts of employer's contributions to plan assets in 2015 are as follows:

 

(€ million)

France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Employer's contributions in 2015 (estimate):

              
 

2015

 6 84  64 47 201  
 

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below shows the expected timing of benefit payments under pension and other post-employment benefit plans for the next ten years:

 

(€ million)

France Germany USA UK Other Total  
    

Estimated future benefit payments:

              
 

2015

 119 212 132 111 43 617  
 

2016

 85 214 135 115 43 592  
 

2017

 124 218 141 118 45 646  
 

2018

 88 221 143 122 50 624  
 

2019

 98 225 147 126 56 652  
 

2020 to 2024

 619 1,149 787 692 296 3,543  
 

        The table below shows estimates as of December 31, 2014 for the timing of future payments in respect of unfunded pension and other post-employment benefit plans:

   Payments due by period  
 

(€ million)

Total Less than 1 year 1 to 3 years 3 to 5 years More than 5 years  
    

Estimated payments

1,369 61 123 138 1,047  
    

D.19.2. Restructuring provisions

        The table below shows movements in restructuring provisions classified in non-current liabilities and in current liabilities:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Balance, beginning of period 1,930 1,611 1,018 1,801 2,213 1,930  
of which:        

Classified in non-current liabilities

 1,182 1,017 257  1,0611,461 1,182  

Classified in current liabilities

 748 594 761  740752 748  
 
Change in provisions recognized in profit or loss for the period 857 861 1,073  287186 857  
Provisions utilized (728) (592) (839) (740)(616)(728) 
Transfers 109 (2) 1 322 (1)

Transfers(1)

 14 109  
Unwinding of discount 45 38 27  2532 45  
Currency translation differences  11 10  12(14)  
 
Balance, end of period 2,213 1,930 1,611 1,399 1,801 2,213  
 
of which:        

Classified in non-current liabilities

 1,461 1,182 1,017  8351,061 1,461  

Classified in current liabilities

 752 748 594  564740 752  
 
(1)
Reclassification of social security charges and "Fillon" levies relating to early retirement plans in France (see Note D.19.1.).
(2)
Includes aIn 2012, includes €101 million transfertransferred from provisions for pensions and other long-term benefits following the announcement of measures to adapt the Group's resources in France (see Note D.19.1.D.19.).

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Provisions for employee termination benefits atas of December 31, 20122014 amounted to €1,235 million (compared with €1,611 million as of December 31, 2013 and €1,982 million (versus €1,672 million atas of December 31, 2011)2012), and primarilymainly covered redundancy programs announced as part of the adaptation of sales forces, R&D and industrial operations in France, the United States, and some other European countries. The provision relating to France was €1,515€1,087 million atas of December 31, 2012, versus €9332014, compared with €1,375 million atas of December 31, 2011. Charges to provisions during the period included €6462013 and €1,553 million for the adaptationas of the Group's resources in France (see Note D.27.).December 31, 2012.

        The provision for France includes the present value of gross annuities under early retirement plans (including those already in place, and those provided for in 2012) not outsourced as of the balance sheet date, plus social security charges and "Fillon" levies on those annuities and on outsourced annuities. The average residual period of carry under these plans was 3.08 years as of December 31, 2014, (3.3 years as of December 31, 2013 and 3.5 years as of December 31, 2012 (3.3 years as of December 31, 2011)2012). In 2012,During 2014, premiums paid in connection with the outsourcing of annuities amounted to €7€18 million (most of which related to an increase in the period of carry for existing annuities in response to the raising of the statutory retirement age); this compares with €6€12 million in 2011.2013 and €7 million in 2012.

        The timing of future termination benefit payments is as follows:

   Year ended December 31, 2012 
  
   Benefit payments by period 
  
(€ million)  Total  Less than
1 year
  From 1 to
3 years
  From 3 to
5 years
  More than
5 years
 
  
Employee termination benefits                

• France

  1,515  400  644  382  89 

• Other countries

  467  257  179  24  7 
  
Total  1,982  657  823  406  96 
  

   Benefit payments by period  
 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


Total Less than
1 year

 
From 1 to
3 years

 
From 3 to
5 years

 
More than
5 years

 
 
    

Employee termination benefits

           
 

•  France

 1,087378 447 212 50  
 

•  Other countries

 14894 48 5 1  
 

Total

1,235 472 495 217 51  
    

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


   Year ended December 31, 2011 
  
   Benefit payments by period 
  
(€ million)  Total  Less than
1 year
  From 1 to
3 years
  From 3 to
5 years
  More than
5 years
 
  
Employee termination benefits                

• France

  933  189  231  339  174 

• Other countries

  739  465  235  21  18 
  
Total  1,672  654  466  360  192 
  

   Benefit payments by period  
 

December 31, 2013
(€ million)


Total Less than
1 year

 
From 1 to
3 years

 
From 3 to
5 years

 
More than
5 years

 
 
    

Employee termination benefits

            
 

•  France

 1,375 511 510 271 83  
 

•  Other countries

 236 153 69 8 6  
 

Total

1,611 664 579 279 89  
    


   Benefit payments by period  
 

December 31, 2012
(€ million)


Total Less than
1 year

 
From 1 to
3 years

 
From 3 to
5 years

 
More than
5 years

 
 
    

Employee termination benefits

            
 

•  France

 1,553 423 655 386 89  
 

•  Other countries

 429 234 168 20 7  
 

Total

1,982 657 823 406 96  
    

D.19.3. Other provisions

        Other provisions include provisions for risks and litigation relating to environmental, tax, commercial and product liability matters.

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Tax exposures 2,114 2,409 2,228  1,4691,515 2,114  
Environmental risks and remediation 728 764 781  696698 728  
Product liability risks, litigation and other 869 985 951  911795 869  
 
Total 3,711 4,158 3,960 3,076 3,008 3,711  
 

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Provisions for tax exposures are recorded if the Group is exposed to a probable risk resulting from a tax position adopted by the Group or a subsidiary, and the risk has been quantified at the balance sheet date.date, in accordance with the principles described in Note B.22.

        Provisions for environmental risks and remediation mainly relate to contingencies arising from business divestitures.

        Identified environmental risks are covered by provisions estimated on the basis of the costs Sanofi believes it will be obliged to meet over a period not exceeding (other than in exceptional cases) 30 years. The Group expects that €99€143 million of these provisions will be utilized in 2013,2015, and €286€350 million over the period from 20142016 through 2017.2019.

        "Product liability risks, litigation and other" mainly comprises provisions for risks relating to product liability (including IBNR provisions as described in Note B.12.), government investigations, regulatory or antitrust law claims, or contingencies arising from business divestitures (other than environmental risks).

        The main pending legal and arbitral proceedings and government investigations are described in Note D.22.

        A full risk and litigation assessment is performed with the assistance of the Group's legal advisers, and provisions are recorded as required by circumstances in accordance with the principles described in Note B.12.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.19.4. Other current liabilities

        Other current liabilities break down as follows:

(€ million)
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 2014 2013(1) 2012(1)  
 
Taxes payable 935 1,060 785  948978 932  
Employee-related liabilities 1,909 1,957 1,411  1,9121,813 1,882  
Restructuring provisions (see Note D.19.2.) 752 748 594  564740 752  
Interest rate derivatives (see Note D.20.) 2 27 3  2 2  
Currency derivatives (see Note D.20.) 40 218 104  21417 40  
Amounts payable for acquisitions of non-current assets 222 191 267  306214 222  
Other liabilities 2,898 3,020 2,460  3,7662,963 2,898  
 
Total 6,758 7,221 5,624 7,712 6,725 6,728  
 
(1)
Includes the impact of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2.).

        This item includes in particular the current portion of provisions for litigation, sales returns and other risks,risks; amounts due to associates and joint ventures (see Note D.6.),; and amounts due to governmental agencies and healthcare authorities (see Note D.23.).

D.20. Derivative financial instruments and market risksDERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND MARKET RISKS

        The table below shows the fair value of derivative instruments as of December 31, 2012:2014:

(€ million)
 Non-
current
assets

 Current
assets

 Total
assets

 Non-
current
liabilities

 Current
liabilities

 Total
liabilities

 Fair value at
Dec. 31,
2012 (net)

 Fair value at
Dec. 31,
2011 (net)

 Fair value at
Dec. 31,
2010 (net)

 Non-
current
assets


 
Current
assets

 
Total
assets

 
Non-
current
liabilities


 
Current
liabilities

 
Total
liabilities

 
Fair value at
December 31,
2014 (net)


 
Fair value at
December 31,
2013 (net)


 
Fair value at
December 31,
2012 (net)


 
 
 
Currency derivatives 1 82 83  (40) (40) 43 (169) (104) 12 111 123  (214)(214)(91)85 43  

operational

 1 30 31  (14) (14) 17 (89) (27)

operating

 12 73 85  (81)(81)431 17  

financial

  52 52  (26) (26) 26 (80) (77)  38 38  (133)(133)(95)54 26  
Interest rate derivatives 393 40 433  (2) (2) 431 456 218  207 98 305 (1)(2)(3)302290 431  
 
Total 394 122 516  (42) (42) 474 287 114 219 209 428 (1)(216)(217)211 375 474  
 

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Objectives of the use of derivative financial instruments

        Sanofi uses derivative instruments to manage operationaloperating exposure to movements in exchange rates, and financial exposure to movements in interest rates and exchange rates (where the debt or receivable is not contracted in the functional currency of the borrower or lender entity)lender). Less frequently, Sanofi uses equity derivatives in connection with the management of its portfolio of equity investments.

        Sanofi performs periodic reviews of its transactions and contractual agreements in order to identify any embedded derivatives, which are accounted for separately from the host contract in accordance with IAS 39. Sanofi had no material embedded derivatives as of December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010.2012.

Counterparty risk

        As of December 31, 2012,2014, all currency and interest rate hedges were contracted with leading banks, and no single counterparty accounted for more than 13%14% of the notional amount of the Group's overall currency and interest rate positions.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

a)    Currency derivatives used to manage operationaloperating risk exposures

        Sanofi operates a foreign exchange risk hedging policy to reduce the exposure of operating income to fluctuations in foreign currencies, in particular the U.S. dollar.exchange rate movements. This policy involves regular assessments of the Group's worldwide foreign currency exposure, based on budget estimates of foreign-currencyforeign currency transactions to be carried out by the parent company and its subsidiaries. TheseThose transactions mainly comprise sales, purchases, research costs, co-marketing and co-promotion expenses, and royalties. To reduce the exposure of these transactions to exchange rate movements, Sanofi contracts hedges using liquid derivative instruments, primarilymainly forward currency purchases and sales, of currency and also currency swaps.

        The table below shows operationaloperating currency hedging instruments in place as of December 31, 2014, with the notional amount translated into euros at the relevant closing exchange rate:

     Of which derivatives designated
as cash flow hedges
  Of which derivatives
not eligible
for hedge accounting
 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Of which
recognized
in equity


 
Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
 
    

Forward currency sales

2,981 4    2,981 4  
    

•  of which U.S. dollar

 1,409 (34)   1,409 (34) 
 

•  of which Japanese yen

 273 5    273 5  
 

•  of which Chinese yuan renminbi

 237 (6)   237 (6) 
 

•  of which Russian rouble

 211 51    211 51  
 

•  of which Singapore dollar

 126 (1)   126 (1) 
 

Forward currency purchases

1,137     1,137   
    

•  of which U.S. dollar

 377 6    377 6  
 

•  of which Singapore dollar

 139 2    139 2  
 

•  of which Japanese yen

 109     109   
 

•  of which Hungarian forint

 99 (2)   99 (2) 
 

•  of which Mexican peso

 69 2    69 2  
 

Total

4,118 4    4,118 4  
    

        The above positions mainly hedge future material foreign-currency cash flows arising after the end of the reporting period in relation to transactions carried out during the year ended December 31, 2014 and recognized in the balance sheet at that date. Gains and losses on hedging instruments (forward contracts) are calculated and recognized in parallel with the recognition of gains and losses on the hedged items. Due to this hedging relationship, the commercial foreign exchange difference on these items (hedging instruments and hedged transactions) will be immaterial in 2015.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below shows operating currency hedging instruments in place as of December 31, 2013, with the notional amount translated into euros at the relevant closing exchange rate:

     Of which derivatives designated
as cash flow hedges
  Of which derivatives
not eligible
for hedge accounting
 

December 31, 2013
(€ million)


Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Of which
recognized
in equity


 
Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
 
    

Forward currency sales

2,943 32    2,943 32  
    

•  of which U.S. dollar

 1,379 14    1,379 14  
 

•  of which Singapore dollar

 345 1    345 1  
 

•  of which Russian rouble

 184 1    184 1  
 

•  of which Japanese yen

 118 9    118 9  
 

•  of which Chinese yuan renminbi

 118     118   
 

Forward currency purchases

537 (1)   537 (1) 
    

•  of which Hungarian forint

 119 1    119 1  
 

•  of which Russian rouble

 64 (1)   64 (1) 
 

•  of which Japanese yen

 54 (1)   54 (1) 
 

•  of which U.S. dollar

 51     51   
 

•  of which Mexican peso

 32     32   
 

Total

3,480 31    3,480 31  
    

        The table below shows operating currency hedging instruments in place as of December 31, 2012, with the notional amount translated into euros at the relevant closing exchange rate:

As of December 31, 2012
  
  
 

 Of which derivatives
designated
as cash flow hedges

 

 Of which derivatives not eligible
for hedge accounting

 
  
(€ million)
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Of which
recognized
in equity

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 
  
Forward currency sales  2,972  21            2,972  21 

• of which U.S. dollar

  972  6            972  6 

• of which Japanese yen

  485  15            485  15 

• of which Russian rouble

  368  (3)           368  (3)

• of which Singapore dollar

  271              271   

• of which Chinese yuan renminbi

  255  1            255  1 
  
Forward currency purchases  944  (4)           944  (4)

• of which Singapore dollar

  231  (4)           231  (4)

• of which Hungarian forint

  166  (3)           166  (3)

• of which Swiss franc

  110              110   

• of which Chinese yuan renminbi

  94                 94   

• of which U.S. dollar

  69              69   
  
Total  3,916  17            3,916  17 
  

     Of which derivatives designated
as cash flow hedges
  Of which derivatives
not eligible
for hedge accounting
 

December 31, 2012
(€ million)


Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Of which
recognized
in equity


 
Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
 
    

Forward currency sales

2,972 21    2,972 21  
    

•  of which U.S. dollar

 972 6    972 6  
 

•  of which Japanese yen

 485 15    485 15  
 

•  of which Russian rouble

 368 (3)   368 (3) 
 

•  of which Singapore dollar

 271     271   
 

•  of which Chinese yuan renminbi

 255 1    255 1  
 

Forward currency purchases

944 (4)   944 (4) 
    

•  of which Singapore dollar

 231 (4)   231 (4) 
 

•  of which Hungarian forint

 166 (3)   166 (3) 
 

•  of which Swiss franc

 110     110   
 

•  of which Chinese yuan renminbi

 94     94   
 

•  of which U.S. dollar

 69     69   
 

Total

3,916 17    3,916 17  
    

        As of December 31, 2012, none of these instruments had an expiry date after February 28, 2013, with the exception of a forward purchase of GBP 33 million expiring between 2013 and 2015.

        These positions mainly hedge material future foreign-currency cash flows arising after the balance sheet date in relation to transactions carried out during the year ended December 31, 2012 and recognized in the balance sheet at that date. Gains and losses on these hedging instruments (forward contracts) are calculated and recognized in parallel with the recognition of gains and losses on the hedged items. Consequently, we do not expect the commercial foreign exchange gain or loss recognized on these items (hedges and hedged instruments) in 2013 to be material.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        The table below shows operational currency hedging instruments in place as of December 31, 2011, with the notional amount translated into euros at the relevant closing exchange rate:

As of December 31, 2011
  
  
 

 Of which derivatives
designated
as cash flow hedges

 

 Of which derivatives not eligible
for hedge accounting

 
  
(€ million)
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Of which
recognized
in equity

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 
  
Forward currency sales  3,446  (96)           3,446  (96)

• of which U.S. dollar

  1,779  (59)           1,779  (59)

• of which Japanese yen

  685  (22)           685  (22)

• of which Russian rouble

  310  (5)           310  (5)

• of which Singapore dollar

  71              71   

• of which Australian dollar

  63  (2)           63  (2)
  
Forward currency purchases  1,077  7            1,077  7 

• of which Singapore dollar

  357  4            357  4 

• of which Swiss franc

  165  2            165  2 

• of which Japanese yen

  124  3            124  3 

• of which Hungarian forint

  107  (4)           107  (4)

• of which U.S. dollar

  69              69   
  
Total  4,523  (89)           4,523  (89)
  

        The table below shows operational currency hedging instruments in place as of December 31, 2010, with the notional amount translated into euros at the relevant closing exchange rate:

As of December 31, 2010
  
  
 

 Of which derivatives
designated
as cash flow hedges

 

 Of which derivatives not eligible
for hedge accounting

 
  
(€ million)
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Of which
recognized
in equity

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 
  
Forward currency sales  2,444  (25)           2,444  (25)

• of which U.S. dollar

  1,380  (12)           1,380  (12)

• of which Russian rouble

  248  (7)           248  (7)

• of which Japanese yen

  202  (4)           202  (4)

• of which Pound sterling

  95  2            95  2 

• of which Australian dollar

  60  (1)           60  (1)
  
Forward currency purchases  257  (2)           257  (2)

• of which Hungarian forint

  84  (1)           84  (1)

• of which U.S. dollar

  51  (1)           51  (1)

• of which Canadian dollar

  31              31   

• of which Russian rouble

  30              30   

• of which Japanese yen

  18              18   
  
Total  2,701  (27)           2,701  (27)
  

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

b)    Currency and interest rate derivatives used to manage financial risk exposuresexposure

        CashThe cash pooling arrangements for foreign subsidiaries outside the euro zone, and some of the Group'sSanofi's financing activities, expose certain Group entities to financial foreign exchange risk. This isrisk (i.e., the risk of changes in the value of borrowings and loans denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the borrower or lender. This risklender). That foreign exchange exposure is hedged by the Sanofi parent company using currencyfirm financial instruments (currency swaps orand forward contracts, which arecontracts) contracted with banks.banking counterparties.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below shows financial currency hedging instruments in place, as of December 31, 2012, with the notional amount translated into euros at the relevant closing exchange rate:

 
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  
(€ million)
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Expiry
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Expiry
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Expiry
 
  
Forward currency sales  3,970  38     4,900  (104)    2,728  (64)   

• of which U.S. dollar

  1,897  1  2013  2,964  (89) 2012  862  (26) 2012 

• of which Japanese yen

  1,272  34  2013  993  (17) 2012  904  (24) 2011 

• of which Czech koruna

  191    2013  251  4  2012  359  (7) 2011 
Forward currency purchases  2,638  (12)    2,719  24     2,086  (13)   

• of which Pound sterling

  549  (3) 2013  843  5  2012  565  (11) 2011 

• of which U.S. dollar

  521  1  2013  828  10  2012  814  (8) 2011 

• of which Singapore dollar

  492  (4) 2013  191  5  2012  20    2011 
Total  6,608  26     7,619  (80)    4,814  (77)   
  
 

2014 

 2013 

 2012 

 

(€ million)

 Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Expiry Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Expiry Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Expiry  
    

Forward currency sales

5,869 (111)  1,860 63   3,970 38    
    

•  of which U.S. dollar(1)

 4,840(111)2015 833 8 2014 1,897 1 2013  
 

•  of which Japanese yen

 57111 2015 698 50 2014 1,272 34 2013  
 

•  of which Pound sterling

 104(2)2015 16  2014 116  2013  
 

Forward currency purchases

2,686 16   2,197 (9)  2,638 (12)   
    

•  of which Singapore dollar

 5635 2015 485 (6)2014 492 (4)2013  
 

•  of which U.S. dollar

 4982 2015 389 (1)2014 521 1 2013  
 

•  of which Pound sterling

 48712 2015 525 2 2014 549 (3)2013  
 

Total

8,555 (95)  4,057 54   6,608 26    
    
(1)
Includes U.S.$43 million designated as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation as of December 31, 2014.

        These forward currency contracts generate a net financial foreign exchange gain or loss arising from the interest rate differential between the hedged currency and the euro, given that the foreign exchange gain or loss on the foreign-currency borrowings and loans is offset by the change in the intrinsic value of the hedging instruments. In addition, theThe Group may also hedge some future foreign-currency cash flows relating to investment or divestment transactions.cash flows.

        Since the financing of the Genzyme acquisition, the Group has managed its net debt in two currencies,currencies: the euro and the U.S. dollar (see Note D.17)D.17.). The floating-rate portion of this debt exposes the Group to rises in interest rates, primarily in the Eonia and Euribor benchmark rates (for the euro) and in the U.S. Libor and Federal Fund Effective rates (for the U.S. dollar). In order to reduce the amount and/or volatility ofTo optimize the cost of debt and/or reduce the Groupvolatility of debt, Sanofi uses interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps and (where appropriate) interest rate options that alter the fixed/floating rate split of debt. TheseThose derivative instruments are predominantly denominated partially in euros and partially in U.S. dollars.

        The table below shows instruments of this type in place as of December 31, 2014:

 

Notional amounts
by expiry date
as of December 31, 2014
 




    Of which
designated as
fair value hedges
 




 Of which
designated as
cash flow hedges
 




 

(€ million)

 2015 2016 2017 2019 2020 2021 Total   Fair
value

 
  Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
  Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Of which
recognized
in equity


 
 
    

Interest rate swaps

                                 
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 2.73%

  500     500   26  500 26       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 1.90%

  1,000  1,550   2,550   169  2,550 169       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 1.15%

   428    428   3          
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 2.22%

     412  412   10  412 10       
 

Interest rate swap, pay 1.22% / receive floating

   412    412   (2)      412 (2)  
 

Cross-currency swaps

                               
 

Pay €4.87% / receive CHF 3.38%

 244      244   89      244 89 1  
 

Currency swaps hedging JPY investments

                                 
 

Pay JPY / receive €

 530      530   7          
 

Total

774 1,500 840 1,550 412  5,076   302   3,462 205   656 87 1  
    

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The table below shows instruments of this type in place as of December 31, 2013:

 

Notional amounts
by expiry date
as of December 31, 2013
 




    Of which
designated as
fair value hedges
 




 Of which
designated as
cash flow hedges
 




 

(€ million)

 2014 2015 2016 2017 2019 2020 Total   Fair
value

 
  Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
  Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Of which
recognized
in equity


 
 
    

Interest rate swaps

                                 
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 2.73%

   500    500   33  500 33       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 2.38%

 1,200  1,000  800  3,000   174  3,000 174       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 1.15%

    428   428   3          
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 0.34%

 363      363   1  363 1       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 2.22%

      363 363   (2)  363 (2)      
 

Interest rate swap, pay 1.22% / receive floating

    363   363   (1)      363 (1)  
 

Cross-currency swaps

                               
 

Pay €4.87% / receive CHF 3.38%

  244     244   82      244 82 1  
 

Total

1,563 244 1,500 791 800 363 5,261   290   4,226 206   607 81 1  
    

        The table below shows instruments of this type in place as of December 31, 2012:

 
 

 Notional amounts by expiry date
as of December 31, 2012

 

  
 

 Of which derivatives
designated as
fair value hedges

 

 Of which derivatives
designated as
cash flow hedges

 
  
(€ million)
  
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2019
 Total
  
 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Of which
recognized
in equity

 
  
Interest rate swaps                                                
– Pay floating/receive 2.73%          500      500    45    500  45         
– Pay floating/receive 2.38%      1,200    1,000    800  3,000    251    3,000  251         
– Pay floating/receive 0.57%            375    375    2    375  2         
– Pay floating/receive 1.15%            428    428    2               
– Pay floating/receive 0.34%      379          379    2    379  2         
Cross-currency swaps                                                
– Pay € floating/receive JPY floating    92            92    40               
– Pay € 4.87%/receive CHF 3.38%        244        244    91          244  91  4 
Currency swaps hedging USD investments                                                
– Pay USD/receive €    872            872    (2)              
  
Total    964  1,579  244  1,500  803  800  5,890    431    4,254  300    244  91  4 
  

        The table below shows instruments of this type in place as of December 31, 2011:

 
 

 Notional amounts by expiry date
as of December 31, 2011

 

  
 

 Of which derivatives
designated as
fair value hedges

 

 Of which derivatives
designated as
cash flow hedges

 
  
(€ million)
  
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2019
 2021
 Total
  
 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Of which
recognized
in equity

 
  
Caps                                                   
– Purchases of caps 0.50%    1,932              1,932    1          1,932  1  (1)
Interest rate swaps                                                   
– Pay floating/receive 2.73%            500      500    34    500  34         
– Pay floating/receive 2.38%        1,200    1,000  800    3,000    204    3,000  204         
– Pay floating/receive 1.86%                232  232    (1)   232  (1)        
– Pay floating/receive 0.34%        386          386    1    386  1         
Cross-currency swaps                                                   
– Pay € floating/receive JPY floating      92            92    58               
– Pay € 4.89%/receive CHF 3.26%    180              180    48          180  48  1 
– Pay € 4.87%/receive CHF 3.38%          244        244    96          244  96  11 
– Pay € floating/receive CHF 3.26%    167              167    42    167  42         
Currency swaps hedging USD investments                                                   
– Pay USD/receive €    1,404              1,404    (27)              
  
Total    3,683  92  1,586  244  1,500  800  232  8,137    456    4,285  280    2,356  145  11 
  
 

Notional amounts
by expiry date
as of December 31, 2012
 




    Of which
designated as
fair value hedges
 




 Of which
designated as
cash flow hedges
 




 

(€ million)

 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2019 Total   Fair
value

 
  Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
  Notional
amount

 
Fair
value

 
Of which
recognized
in equity


 
 
    

Interest rate swaps

                                 
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 2.73%

    500   500   45  500 45       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 2.38%

  1,200  1,000  800 3,000   251  3,000 251       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 0.57%

     375  375   2  375 2       
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 1.15%

     428  428   2          
 

Interest rate swap, pay floating / receive 0.34%

  379     379   2  379 2       
 

Cross-currency swaps

                                 
 

Pay € floating / receive JPY floating

 92      92   40          
 

Pay €4.87% / receive CHF 3.38%

   244    244   91      244 91 4  
 

Currency swaps hedging USD investments

                                 
 

Pay USD / receive €

 872      872   (2)          
 

Total

964 1,579 244 1,500 803 800 5,890   431   4,254 300   244 91 4  
    

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

c)    Actual or potential effects of netting arrangements

        The table below shows instruments of this typeis prepared in place as of December 31, 2010:accordance with the accounting policies described in Note B.8.3.:

 
 

 Notional amounts by expiry date
as of December 31, 2010

 

  
 

 Of which derivatives
designated as
fair value hedges

 

 Of which derivatives
designated as
cash flow hedges

 
  
(€ million)
  
 2011
 2012
 2013
 2015
 2016
 Total
  
 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

  
 Notional
amount

 Fair
value

 Of which
recognized
in equity

 
  
Interest rate swaps                                             
– Pay floating/receive 2.73%            500  500    12    500  12         
Cross-currency swaps                                             
– Pay € floating/receive JPY floating        92      92    47               
– Pay € 4.89%/receive CHF 3.26%      180        180    41          180  41  1 
– Pay € 4.87%/receive CHF 3.38%          244    244    82          244  82  6 
– Pay € floating/receive CHF 3.26%      167        167    38    167  38         
Currency swaps                                             
– pay €/receive USD    489          489    (2)              
  
Total    489  347  92  244  500  1,672    218    667  50    424  123  7 
  
 

2014 

 2013 

 2012 

 

(€ million)

 Derivative
financial
assets


 
Derivative
financial
liabilities


 
Derivative
financial
assets


 
Derivative
financial
liabilities


 
Derivative
financial
assets


 
Derivative
financial
liabilities


 
 
    

Gross carrying amounts before offset (a)

 428(217)395 (20)516 (42) 
 

Gross amounts offset (in accordance with IAS 32) (b)

       
 

Net amounts as reported in the balance sheet
(a) - (b) = (c)


428 (217)395 (20)516 (42) 
    

Effects of other netting arrangements (not fulfilling the IAS 32 criteria for offsetting) (d):

             
 

Financial instruments

 (192)192 (20)20 (42)42  
 

Fair value of financial collateral

 not applicablenot applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable  
 

Net exposure (c) + (d)

236 (25)375  474   
    

D.21. Off balance sheet commitmentsOFF BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS

        The off balance sheet commitments presented below are shown at their nominal value.

D.21.1. Off balance sheet commitments relating to operating activities

        The Group's offOff balance sheet commitments relating to the Group's operating activities break down as follows:

December 31, 2012
 Payments due by period
 
  
(€ million)
 Total
 Under
1 year

 From 1 to 3
years

 From 3 to 5
years

 Over 5
years

 
  
• Operating lease obligations  1,296  250  367  220  459 
• Irrevocable purchase commitments (1)                

– given

  2,913  1,513  651  368  381 

– received

  (209) (106) (67) (14) (22)
• Research and development license agreements                

– future service commitments (2)

  767  181  286  276  24 

– potential milestone payments (3)

  2,201  149  267  295  1,490 
Firm commitment under the agreement with BMS (4)  82        82 
  
Total  7,050  1,987  1,504  1,145  2,414 
  
 

Payments due by period 

 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


 
Total Less than
1 year

 
From 1 to
3 years

 
From 3 to
5 years

 
More than
5 years

 
 
    

Operating lease(1)

 1,235249 391 189 406  
 

Irrevocable purchase commitments(2)

           
 

•  given(3)

 3,6252,027 923 349 326  
 

•  received

 (243)(179)(41)(3)(20) 
 

Research and development license agreements

           
 

•  future service commitments(4)

 480165 283 7 25  
 

•  potential milestone payments(5)

 2,140104 239 693 1,104  
 

Firm commitments under the agreement with BMS(6)

 95  95   
 

Total

7,332 2,366 1,795 1,330 1,841  
    
(1)
Operating leases as of December 31, 2014 include €115 million of commitments given to joint ventures.
(2)
These comprise irrevocable commitments to suppliers of (i) property, plant and equipment, net of down payments (see Note D.3.) and (ii) goods and services. Comparable amountsAs of December 31, 2013, irrevocable commitments amounted to €3,189 million given and €(237) million received.
(3)
Irrevocable commitments given as of December 31, 2011 were €3,0412014 include €422 million (commitments given) and (€247) million (commitments received).of commitments given to joint ventures.
(2)(4)
Future service commitments under research and development license agreements mainly comprise research financing commitments, but also include consideration for access to technologies.technology. Future service commitments as of December 31, 2011 amounted to €9442013 totaled €569 million.
(3)(5)
This line includes only potential milestone payments on projects regarded as reasonably possible, i.e. on projects in the development phase. Potential milestone payments as of December 31, 2011,2013 amounted to €2,822€1,589 million.
(4)(6)
See note C.1.Note C.2.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Operating leases

        The Group leases certain of its properties and equipment used in the ordinary course of business under operating leases. Future minimum lease payments due under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 20122014 were €1,296€1,235 million (versus €1,456€1,265 million at December 31, 20112013 and €1,291€1,296 million at December 31, 2010)2012).

        Total rental expense recognized in the year ended December 31, 20122014 was €317 million (versus €338 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 and €294 million (versus €324 million in 2011 and €281 million in 2010)the year ended December 31, 2012).


Research and development license agreements

        In pursuance of its strategy, the Group may acquire technologies and rights to products. Such acquisitions may be made in various contractual forms: acquisitions of shares, loans, license agreements, joint development and co-marketing. These contractsarrangements usually involve upfront payments on signature of the agreement, development milestone payments, and royalties. Some of these complex agreements include undertakings to financefund research programs in future years and payments contingent upon specified development milestones, the granting of approvals or licenses, or the attainment of sales targets once a product is on the market.

        The "Research and development license agreements" line comprises future service commitments to financefund research and development or technology, and potential milestone payments regarded as reasonably possible (i.e. all potential milestone payments relating to projects in the development phase, for which the future financial consequences are known and considered as probable and for which there is a sufficiently reliable estimate). This itemIt excludes commitments relating to projects in the research phase (€54.2 billion in 2012, €4.22014, €3.8 billion in 2011)2013) and payments contingent upon the attainment of sales targets once a product is on the market (€4.7 billion in 2012, €4.42014, €3.6 billion in 2011)2013).

        Potential milestone payments relating to Pharmaceuticals segment development projects amount to €2€1.9 billion, of which €1.4€1.6 billion relates to the principal collaboration agreements described below.below:


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Sanofi has also entered into the followinga number of other major agreements, currently in a less advanced research phase:agreements:


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        In June 2012,2014, Sanofi and Alopexx Pharmaceuticals LLC terminated their collaboration agreement. At the same time as that termination, a license agreement was signed relating to an antibody for the prevention and treatment of infections originating in the bacterium that causes plague and other serious infections.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        In 2014, Sanofi and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals Inc. decided to discontinueterminate their exclusive global licensing and collaboration agreement covering the BiTE® antibody projectMM-121 molecule for the management of solid tumors.

        Also in 2014, Sanofi and terminate itsGlenmark Pharmaceuticals S.A. terminated their collaboration with Micromet.agreement on the development and commercialization of novel TRPV3 anatagonist molecules, including the GRC15300 compound, in the treatment of chronic pain.

        Sanofi Pasteur has also entered into a number of collaboration agreements. Milestoneagreements, under which potential milestone payments relating to projects in the development projects under those agreementsphase amounted to €0.2 billion in 2012.2014.

Other agreements

        In December 2009,February 2014, pursuant to the "Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits", Sanofi Pasteur signed a donation letter toand the World Health Organization (WHO) signed a "Standard Material Transfer Agreement" (SMTA 2). This agreement stipulates that Sanofi Pasteur will, during declared pandemic periods, (i) donate 7.5% of its real-time production of pandemic vaccines against any strain with potential to cause a pandemic, and (ii) reserve a further 7.5% of such production on affordable terms. This agreement cancels and replaces all preceding commitments to donate pandemic vaccines to the WHO.

        Sanofi and Royalty Pharma (RP) entered into an agreement in December 2014. The termsagreement relates to two advanced-phase projects. Royalty Pharma will fund a portion of the agreement committedremaining development costs of the project on a quarterly basis, and will receive a royalty based on future sales. This transaction is a co-investment, whereby the partner acquires an interest in the jointly-developed product by providing funding. Consequently, the amounts received by Sanofi Pasteur to donate 10% of its future output of vaccines against A(H1N1), A(H5N1) or any other influenza strain with pandemic potential, up towill be recorded as a maximum of 100 million doses. Since this agreement was putreduction in place, Sanofi Pasteur has already donateddevelopment costs, to the WHO some ofextent that the doses covereddevelopment costs incurred by Sanofi are recognized in profit or loss in accordance with the commitment.policies described in Note B.4.1.

D.21.2. Off balance sheet commitments relatedrelating to the financing activities of the Group

Credit facilities

        Undrawn credit facilities break down as follows:

December 31, 2012
 Payments due by period
 
  
(€ million)
 Total
 Under
1 year

 From 1 to
3 years

 From 3 to
5 years

 Over
5 years

 
  
General-purpose credit facilities  10,021  3,020  250  6,750  1 
  

   Expiry  
 

December 31, 2014
(€ million)


Total Less than
1 year

 
From 1 to
3 years

 
From 3 to
5 years

 
More than
5 years

 
 
    

General-purpose credit facilities

 8,01312  8,000 1  
 

        As of December 31, 2012,2014, total credit facilities amounted to €10,021€8,013 million (versus €10,046(compared with €10,021 million as of December 31, 20112013 and €23,464 million as of December 31, 2010 including Genzyme acquisition facilities)2012).


Guarantees

        GuaranteesThe table below shows the amount of guarantees given and received (mainly surety bonds) are as follows:received:

(€ million)
 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014 2013 2012  
 
Guarantees given 4,311 3,296 2,558  3,7274,267 4,311  

• Guarantees provided to banks in connection with credit facilities

 2,6942,852 2,790  

• Other guarantees given

 1,0331,415 1,521  
Guarantees received (185) (224) (185) (181)(176)(185) 
 

D.21.3. Off balance sheet commitments relating to the scope of consolidation

        Funding commitments to associates are disclosed in Note D.6.

        The maximum amount of contingent consideration relatedrelating to business combinations is presenteddisclosed in Note D.18.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.22. Legal and Arbitral ProceedingsLEGAL AND ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS

        Sanofi and its affiliates are involved in litigation, arbitration and other legal proceedings. These proceedings typically are related to product liability claims, intellectual property rights (particularly claims against generic companies seeking to limit the patent protection of Sanofi products), competition law and trade practices, commercial claims, employment and wrongful discharge claims, tax assessment claims, waste disposal and pollution claims, and claims under warranties or indemnification arrangements relating to business divestitures. Provisions related to legal and arbitral proceedings are recorded in accordance with the principles described in Note B.12.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        Most of the issues raised by these claims are highly complex and subject to substantial uncertainties; therefore, the probability of loss and an estimation of damages are difficult to ascertain. Contingent liabilities are cases for which either we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the expected financial effect that will result from ultimate resolution of the proceeding, or a cash outflow is not probable. In either case, a brief description of the nature of the contingent liability is disclosed and, where practicable, an estimate of its financial effect, an indication of the uncertainties relating to the amount and timing of any outflow, and the possibility of any reimbursement are provided in application of paragraph 86 of IAS 37.

        In the cases that have been settled or adjudicated, or where quantifiable fines and penalties have been assessed, we have indicated our losses or the amount of provision accrued that is the estimate of the probable loss.

        In a limited number of ongoing cases, while we are able to make a reasonable estimate of the expected loss or range of the possible loss and have accrued a provision for such loss, we believe that publication of this information on a case-by-case basis or by class would seriously prejudice the Company's position in the ongoing legal proceedings or in any related settlement discussions. Accordingly, in those cases, we have disclosed information with respect to the nature of the contingency but have not disclosed our estimate of the range of potential loss, in accordance with paragraph 92 of IAS 37.

        These assessments can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management. We believe that the aggregate provisions recorded for the above matters are adequate based upon currently available information. However, given the inherent uncertainties related to these cases and involved in estimating contingent liabilities, we could in the future incur judgments that could have a material adverse effect on our net income in any particular period.

        Long term provisions other than provisions for pensions and other benefits and restructuring provisions are disclosed in Note D.19.3.D.19.

a)    Products

• Sanofi Pasteur Hepatitis B Vaccine Product Litigation

        Since 1996, more than 180 lawsuits have been filed in various French civil courts against Sanofi Pasteur and/or Sanofi Pasteur MSD S.N.C., the former a French subsidiary of Sanofi, and the latter a joint venture company with Merck & Co., Inc. In such lawsuits, the plaintiffs allege that they suffer from a variety of neurological disorders and autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis and Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result of receiving the hepatitis B vaccine. TheTo date, only one claim decided against the company has been upheld by the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation), in July 2009, upheld a decision of the Court of Appeals of Lyon ordering Sanofi Pasteur MSD S.N.C. to pay damages of €120,000 to a claimant whose multiple sclerosis appeared shortly after her vaccination against the hepatitis B virus; however, in several cases before and after the July 2009 decision, theCour de Cassation upheld several decisions of various Courts of Appeals (including the Court of Appeals of Paris), rejecting claims alleging such causal link..

        In January 2008, both the legal entity Sanofi Pasteur MSD S.N.C., and a corporate officer of this company, as well as a former corporate officer of Sanofi Pasteur, were placed under investigation in an ongoing criminal inquiry in France relating to alleged side effects caused by the hepatitis B vaccine. SinceIn March 2012, Sanofi Pasteur and the former chief executive officer of Sanofi Pasteur have been placed under an "advised witness" status.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

former pharmacist in charge, deputy chief executive officer of Sanofi Pasteur were placed under an "advised witness" status.

• Plavix® Product Litigation

        Around 444As of December 31, 2014, around 1,024 lawsuits, involving approximately 2,8575,847 claimants have been filed against affiliates of the Group and Bristol-Myers Squibb seeking recovery under U.S. state law for personal injuries allegedly sustained in connection with the use of Plavix®. The actions are venued in several jurisdictions, including the federal and/or state courts of New Jersey, New York, California, Pennsylvania,Delaware, and Illinois. The defendants have exercised their right to terminate the tolling agreement (agreement which tolls or suspends the running of the statute of limitations), effective September 1, 2012, with respect to unfiled claims by potential additional plaintiffs. It is not possible, at this stage, to assess reliably the outcome of these lawsuits or the potential financial impact on the Company.

b)    Patents

• Ramipril Canada Patent Litigation

        Sanofi ishas been involved in a number of legal proceedings involving companies which market generic Altace® (ramipril) in Canada. Notwithstanding proceedings initiated by Sanofi, eight manufacturers obtained marketing authorizations from the Canadian Minister of Health for generic versions of ramipril in Canada. Following the marketing of these products, Sanofi filed patent infringement actions against all those companies. In a patent infringement action, the Federal Court of Canada ruled on June 29, 2009 that the patent asserted by Sanofi was invalid. Sanofi's leave to appeal the judgment was denied in 2012. Each of Teva, Apotex and Riva initiated Section 8 damages claims against Sanofi, seeking compensation for their alleged inability to market a generic ramipril during the time taken to resolve the proceedings against the Canadian Ministry of Health. The Teva and Apotex Section 8 trials were heard early 2012 respectively and the Court issued its decision on May 11, 2012 setting down the parameters for calculating total damages owed. Sanofi and Teva reached an agreement in June 2012 on a confidential amount to satisfy Teva's claim and in November 2012, Apotex was awarded CAD 221CAD221 million.

        Sanofi has appealed both rulings. In March 2014, the Court's decisionsFederal Court of Appeal dismissed Sanofi's appeal with respect to Teva and issued a decision in both the appeal with respect to Apotex increasing Apotex's damages award, and Teva Section 8 casescosts of all appeals (not including costs associated with underlying trial). In May 2014, Sanofi and Apotex executed a settlement agreement in satisfaction of the Federal Court of Appeal's increased damages judgment. Sanofi filed an Application for Leave to Appeal the Court of Appeal's ruling to the Federal courtSupreme Court of Appeal.Canada, which was granted in October 2014. The Riva Section 8 trial has beencase remains stayed untilpending resolution of the Apotex and Teva cases are decided on appeal.Supreme Court Appeal.

• Plavix® Patent Litigation in Australia

        In August, 2007, GenRX (a subsidiary of Apotex) obtained registration of a generic clopidogrel bisulfate product on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. At the same time, GenRX filed a patent invalidation action with the Federal Court of Australia, seeking revocation of Sanofi's Australian enantiomer patent claiming clopidogrel salts (a "nullity action"). In September 2007, Sanofi obtained a preliminary injunction from the Federal Court preventing commercial launch of this generic clopidogrel bisulfate product until judgment on the substantive issues of patent validity and infringement. In February 2008, Spirit Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd. also filed a nullity action against Sanofi's Australian enantiomer patent. The Spirit proceeding was consolidated with the Apotex proceeding.

        In August, 2008, the Australian Federal Court confirmed that the claim in Sanofi's Australian enantiomer patent directed to clopidogrel bisulfate (the salt form in Plavix®) was valid and the patent infringed. On appeal, the Full Federal Court of Australia held in September 2009 that all claims in the patent are invalid. Sanofi's appeal to the Australia SupremeHigh Court was denied in March 2010. The security bond posted by Sanofi in connection with the preliminary injunction obtained in 2007 was subsequently increased from Australian $40 million to Australian $204 million (€16027 million to €138 million as of December 31, 2012)2014). Apotex is now seekingsought damages in the range of Australian $20 million to Australian $236 million (€13 million to €159 million as of December 31, 2014), plus interest for having been subject to an injunction.

        The AustraliaOn April 8, 2013, the Australian Department of Health and Ageing (the "Department") has notified Sanofi that it claims to be entitled to moneyfiled an application before the Federal Court of Australia seeking payment of damages from Sanofi related to the Apotex preliminary injunction. The Department has not yet taken any formal legal action associated with this claim.injunction amounting to a range of Australian $375 million to Australian $529 million (€253 million to €357 million), plus interest.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Sanofi and BMS settled the litigation with Apotex in November 2014. In light of the Apotex settlement, the Commonwealth has requested that the Court consider a set of legal issues separate from trial that could simplify the trial.

Alirocumab Patent Litigation in the U.S.

        Amgen filed four separate complaints against Sanofi in the U.S. asserting patent infringement on October 17, October 28, November 11, and November 18, 2014 based on Sanofi and Regeneron plans to submit U.S. Biologic License Application for alirocumab. Together these complaints allege that Sanofi's alirocumab product infringes seven patents and seek injunctive relief and unspecified damages. These cases were consolidated in one case in December 2014.

c)    Government Investigations, Competition Law and Regulatory Claims

• Cipro® Antitrust Litigation

        Since August 2000, Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (API) has been a defendant in several related cases in U.S. state and federal courts alleging that API and certain other pharmaceutical manufacturers violated U.S. antitrust laws and various state laws by settling a patent dispute regarding the brand-name prescription drug Cipro® in a manner which allegedly delayed the arrival of generic competition.

        In March 2005, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted Sanofi's summary judgment motions, and issued a judgment in favor of API and the other defendants in this litigation. By Order entered October 15, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court's ruling in the appeal by indirect purchaser plaintiffs; the direct purchaser plaintiffs' appeal was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in April 2009. On April 29, 2010, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court's ruling dismissing the direct purchasers' case on summary judgment. The direct purchaser plaintiffs requested a rehearing en banc, which was denied by the Federal Circuit in September 2010. Following an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court by the direct purchaser plaintiffs, on March 7, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the direct purchaser plaintiff's petition for a writ of certiori, thus ending the federal litigation relating to Cipro®.There is one case remaining in California which is stayed pending the decision of the US Supreme Court inIn re. K-Dur Antitrust Litigation.

• DDAVP® Antitrust Litigation

        Subsequent to the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in February 2005 holding the patent rights at issue in the DDAVP® tablet litigation to be unenforceable as a result of inequitable conduct, eight putative class actions have been filed claiming injury as a result of Ferring B.V. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s alleged scheme to monopolize the market for DDAVP® tablets in violation of the Sherman Act and the antitrust and deceptive trade practices statutes of several states. In August 2011, Aventis Pharmaceuticals and Ferring reached an agreement with direct purchaser plaintiffs resolving their claims. Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. agreed to resolve these claims for U.S. $3.5 million. In December 2012, Aventis Pharmaceuticals reached a settlement with the indirect purchasers for U.S. $800 000.

• Lovenox® Antitrust Litigation

        In August 2008, Eisai Inc. (Eisai) brought suit against Sanofi U.S. LLC and Sanofi U.S. Inc. (collectively, Sanofi U.S.) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that certain contracting practices for Lovenox® violate federal and state antitrust laws. The proceedings are inIn March 2014, the discovery phase. An estimateCourt issued an order granting Sanofi U.S.'s motion for summary judgment on liability and dismissing the case. In April 2014, Eisai filed a notice of appeal to the financial effectCourt of this case is not practicable at this stage of the litigation.Appeals. Eisai's appeal remains pending.

        Sanofi U.S. LLC and Sanofi U.S. Inc. filed a separate state court lawsuit against Eisai and two individuals who are current employees of Eisai and former employees of Sanofi U.S. and/or its predecessors. Sanofi U.S. alleges that the individuals took confidential information from Sanofi U.S. predecessors to Eisai in breach of their employment agreements with Sanofi, and that such confidential information has been utilized by them and by Eisai to the detriment of Sanofi U.S. This litigation is stayed.

d)    Other litigation and arbitration

• HoechstU.S. Shareholder LitigationSecurities Class Action

        On December 21, 2004, the extraordinary general meeting of Sanofi's German subsidiary Hoechst AG (now Hoechst GmbH) approved a resolution transferring the shares held by minority shareholders to Sanofi for compensation of €56.50 per share. Certain minority shareholders filed claims contesting the validity of the resolution, preventing its registration with the commercial register of Frankfurt and its entry into effect.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        On July 12, 2005, this litigation was settled. As a consequence, the squeeze out has been registered in the commercial register making Sanofi, the sole shareholder of Hoechst AG.

        According to the settlement agreement, the cash compensation has been increased to €63.80 per share. The cash compensation was further increased by another €1.20 per share for those outstanding shareholders whointer alia waived in advance any increase of the cash compensation obtained through a judicial appraisal proceeding(Spruchverfahren) brought byits former minority shareholders. Minority shareholders representing approximately 5 million shares did not accept such offer.

        Subsequently,CEO, current CFO, and a number of current and former minority shareholders of Hoechst initiated a judicial appraisal proceeding with the District Court of Frankfurt (Landgericht Frankfurt-am-Main) contesting the amount of the cash compensation paiddirectors and officers have been named as defendants in the squeeze out. In its decision dated January 27, 2012, the District Court of Frankfurt ruled in favor of Sanofi, confirming the amount of €63.80 per share as adequate cash compensation. A number of opt-out shareholders have filed an appeal with the Appeals Court of Frankfurt.

• Zimulti®/Acomplia® (rimonabant) Class Action

        In November 2007, a purportedputative class action waslawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Sanofi shares. The complaint chargedsecurities between February 7, 2013 and December 3, 2014, and purchasers of Sanofi securities in connection with Sanofi's Action 2013 Shareholding Plan beginning on November 6, 2013. Both lawsuits allege that Sanofi's public disclosures materially misrepresented or failed to disclose (i) improper payments to healthcare providers and (ii) the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting.

CVR Class Action

        In December 2013, Sanofi and certain of its current and former officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleged that defendants' statements regarding rimonabant (a product withdrawn from the market, formerly registered under the trademark Acomplia®were named as defendants in Europe and Zimulti®two putative class action lawsuits filed in the US) were materially false and misleading when made because defendants allegedly concealed data concerning certain alleged secondary effects of rimonabant, in particular, suicidality in patients suffering from depression. In September 2009, the motion was dismissed with prejudice. The plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration. On July 27, 2010, the U.S.United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted plaintiff's motionYork. The complaints in the lawsuits, which were filed on behalf of a putative class of holders of NASDAQ-traded contingent value rights ("CVRs") originally issued in connection with Sanofi's acquisition of Genzyme in 2011, principally allege that Sanofi's public disclosures materially misrepresented (i) the efficacy and safety of Lemtrada® (alemtuzumab) and (ii) the design of two Lemtrada® clinical trials, CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II. Such alleged misrepresentations, according to reconsiderthe complaints, caused an artificial inflation in the price of the CVRs during the period March 6, 2012 through November 7, 2013. Based on these allegations, the complaints allege violations by the defendants of Sections 10(b) and authorized plaintiffs to submit an amended complaint.20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In November 2010, the District Court heard arguments on Sanofi'sJune 2014, Sanofi filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' amended complaint. By Order dated March 31, 2011, the U.S. Districtcase for failure to state a claim, and on January 28, 2015 the Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a number of individual defendants, however, denied Sanofi's requestboth complaints in their entirety with prejudice. The plaintiffs have 30 days to dismiss the company, as well as one of its current officers and one of its former officers. On November 11, 2011, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Oral argument on plaintiff's motion for class certification took place on September 19, 2012. Discovery is on-going. A reliable measure of potential liabilities arising fromappeal this purported class action is not possible at this stage of the litigation.judgment.

• Merial Heartgard® Advertisement Claim

        On August 31, 2009, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against Merial before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, alleging that Merial engaged in false and misleading advertising of Heartgard® and Heartgard® Plus by claiming 100% efficacy in the prevention of heartworm disease, as well as the prevention of zoonotic diseases. Plaintiffs also requestrequested punitive damages and a permanent injunction with respect to the alleged


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

advertising. The proceedings are ongoing and the class has not been certified yet. Merial filed a motion for summary judgment. A reliable measureIn September 2013, the Fifth Circuit Court of potential liabilities arising from this putativeAppeals confirmed the denial of Plaintiffs' motion for class action is not possible at this stage ofcertification.

        On January 10, 2014, the litigation.District Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Merial's motion for summary judgment. In May 2014, the parties executed a settlement agreement and the case was dismissed with prejudice.

• Merial Frontline® Advertisement Claim

        From October 2011 through January 2012, ten putative class actions were filed against Merial in various U.S. federal courts, each alleging that the plaintiffs sustained damages after purchasing defendants' products (Merial's Frontline® and /orand/or Certifect® brands and Bayer's Advantage® and Advantix® brands) for their pets' flea problems. These actions have been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio and consolidated in a multi-district litigation.

        The complaints seeksought injunctive relief and containcontained counts for violations of consumer protection or deceptive trade practices acts, false advertising, breach of implied and express warranty and violations of the


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Four of the complaints seeksought U.S.$32 billion in damages, two complaints seeksought greater than U.S.$4 billion in damages, and the remaining four complaints seeksought damages in excess of U.S.$5 million. No class has been certified yet. In October 2012, defendants filed awas certified. On March 19, 2013, the Court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. Discoveryjudgment filed and dismissed the cases.

        In May 2014, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of Merial Limited. The case is ongoing. A reliable measure of potential liabilities arising from this putative class action litigation is currently not possible.closed.

e)    Contingencies arising from certain Business Divestitures

        Sanofi and its subsidiaries, Hoechst and Aventis Agriculture, divested a variety of mostly chemical, including agro-chemical, businesses as well as certain health product businesses in previous years. As a result of these divestitures, the Group is subject to a number of ongoing contractual and legal obligations regarding the state of the sold businesses, their assets, and their liabilities.

• Aventis Behring Retained Liabilities

        The divestment of Aventis Behring and related protein therapies assets became effective on March 31, 2004. The purchase agreement contained customary representations and warranties running from Sanofi as seller to CSL Limited as purchaser. Sanofi has indemnification obligations that generally expired on March 31, 2006 (the second anniversary of the closing date). However, some indemnification obligations, having a longer duration, remain in effect, for example, indemnification obligations relating to the due organization, capital stock and ownership of Aventis Behring Companies runsran through March 31, 2014, and product liability indemnification runs through March 31, 2019, subject to an extension for claims related to certain types of product liability notified before such date. Furthermore, for tax-related issues, the indemnification obligation of Sanofi covers all taxable periods that end on or before the closing date and expires thirty days after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. In addition, the indemnification obligations relating to certain specified liabilities, including HIV liability, survive indefinitely.

        Under the indemnification agreement, Sanofi is generally obligated to indemnify CSL Limited, only to the extent indemnifiable, losses exceeding U.S.$10 million and up to a maximum aggregate amount of U.S.$300 million. For environmental claims, the indemnification due by Sanofi equals 90% of the indemnifiable losses. Product liability claims are generally treated separately, and the aggregate indemnification is capped at U.S.$500 million. Certain indemnification obligations, including those related to HIV liability, as well as tax claims, are not capped in amount.

• Aventis CropScience Retained Liabilities

        The sale by Aventis Agriculture S.A. and Hoechst GmbH (both legacy companies of Sanofi) of their aggregate 76% participation in Aventis CropScience Holding (ACS) to Bayer and Bayer CropScience AG (BCS), the wholly owned subsidiary of Bayer which holds the ACS shares, was effective on June 3, 2002. The stock purchase agreementStock Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated October 2, 2001, contained customary representations and warranties with respect to the sold business, as well as a number of indemnifications, in particular with respect to: environmental liabilities (the


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(the representations and warranties and the environmental indemnification are subject to a cap of €836 million, except for certain legal representations and warranties and specific environmental liabilities); taxes; certain legal proceedings; claims related to StarLink® corn; and certain pre-closing liabilities, in particular, product liability cases (which are subject to a cap of €418 million). There are various periods of limitation depending upon the nature or subject of the indemnification claim. Further, Bayer and BCS are subject to a number of obligations regarding mitigation and cooperation.

        Starting with a first settlement agreement signed in December 2005, Aventis Agriculture and Hoechst GmbH have resolved a substantial number of disputes with Bayer and BCS, including the termination of arbitration proceedings initiated in August 2003 for an alleged breach of a financial statement-related representation contained in the stock purchase agreement, and numerous other warranty and indemnification claims asserted under the stock purchase agreement, including claims relating to certain environmental and product liabilities. A number of other outstanding claims remain unresolved.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

LLRICE601 and LLRICE604 — U.S. Litigation:Litigation

        On December 19, 2014, BCS has sent Sanofi notice of potential claimsinitiated a claim for arbitration seeking indemnification under various provisions of the stock purchase agreement.SPA, with a demand for €787.5 million.

        These potential claims relate to several hundred individual complaints that have been filed since August 2006 by rice growers, millers, and distributors in U.S. state and federal courts against a number of current and former subsidiaries (collectively the "CropScience Companies") which were part of the ACS group prior to Bayer's acquisition of the ACS shares.

        Plaintiffs in these cases seek to recover damages in connection with the detection of trace amounts of the genetically modified rice called "Liberty Link® Rice 601" (also known as "LLRICE601") or "Liberty Link® Rice 604" (also known as "LLRICE604") in samples of commercial long-grain rice. LLRICE601 and LLRICE604, each a variety of long grain rice genetically altered to resist Liberty® Herbicide, were grown in field tests in the United States from the years 1998 to 2001. Plaintiffs assert a number of causes of action, alleging that the CropScience Companies failed to take adequate measures to prevent cross-pollination or commingling of LLRICE601 and/or LLRICE604 with conventional rice. Bayer alleges it has paid out over U.S.$1.2 billion in judgments, settlements and litigation costs.

        In July 2011, BCS reached settlement agreements with attorneys representing U.S. long-grain rice growers at a total amount of U.S.$750 million, thus settling cases that were part of the U.S. federal multi-district litigation, as well as those cases before state courts. The settlement agreement with state court grower plaintiffsSanofi does not include certain cases which reached verdicts in Arkansas State Court, as well as certain grower casesconsider that were settled separately fromthese claims constitute indemnifiable losses under the global settlement, where BCS has paid in judgement or settlement a collective total of approximately U.S.$67 million.SPA.

        With respect to one of those cases, the Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state court jury award of U.S.$42 million in punitive damages, ruling that the statutory cap on punitive damages is unconstitutional. BCS has reached settlement with a number of non-grower plaintiffs, primarily millers and European importers, for a total of approximately U.S.$203 million. In March 2011, an Arkansas State Court jury awarded Riceland Foods U.S.$11.8 million in compensatory damages and U.S.$125 million in punitive damages. In June 2011 (prior to the above-mentioned Arkansas Supreme Court decision) punitive damages were reduced to U.S.$1 million in application of the statutory cap. Both BCS and Riceland appealed the decision, and in January 2013, reached a settlement resolving Riceland's claims. Non-grower trials are scheduled for 2013.

        Sanofi denies direct or indirect liability for these cases, and has so notified BCS.

        In a related development, theThe FDA has concluded that the presence of LLRICE601 in the food and feed supply poses no safety concerns and, on November 24, 2006, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced it would deregulatederegulated LLRICE601. With respect to LLRICE 604,LLRICE604, the USDA announced, in March 2007, that the PAT protein contained in LLRICE604 has a long history of safe use and is present in many deregulated products. Further to an investigation regarding the causation chain that led to contamination, in October 2007, the USDA declined to pursue enforcement against BCS.

• Aventis Animal Nutrition Retained Liabilities

        Aventis Animal Nutrition S.A. and Aventis (both legacy companies of Sanofi) signed an agreement for the sale to Drakkar Holdings S.A. of the Aventis Animal Nutrition business effective in April 2002. The sale agreement contained customary representations and warranties. Sanofi's indemnification obligations ran through April 2004, except for environmental indemnification obligations (which runran through April 2012), tax indemnification obligations (which run through the expiration of the applicable statutory limitation period), and antitrust indemnification obligations (which extend indefinitely). The indemnification undertakings are subject to an overall cap of €223 million, with a lower cap for certain environmental claims. Indemnification obligations for antitrust and tax claims are not capped.

• Celanese AG Retained Liabilities

        The demerger of the specialty chemicals business from Hoechst to Celanese AG (now trading as "Celanese GmbH") became effective on October 22, 1999. Under the demerger agreement between Hoechst and


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Celanese, Hoechst expressly excluded any representations and warranties regarding the shares and assets demerged to Celanese. However,Celanese subsequently contributed rights and obligations relating to environmental liabilities


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

resulting from the demerger agreement to a subsidiary CCC Environmental Management and Solutions GmbH & Co. KG. The following obligations of Hoechst are ongoing:

        Compensation paid to third parties by Celanese and CCC through December 31, 2012,2014 was significantly below the first threshold of €250 million.

• Rhodia Retained Liabilities

        In connection with the initial public offering of Rhodia in 1998, Rhône-Poulenc (later named Aventis, to which Sanofi is the legal successor in interest) entered into an environmental indemnification agreement with Rhodia on May 26, 1998 under which, subject to certain conditions, Rhodia was entitled to claim indemnification from Aventis with respect to direct losses resulting from third-party claims or public authority injunctions for environmental damages. Aventis and Rhodia entered into a settlement agreement on March 27, 2003 under the terms of which the parties settled all environmental claims in connection with the environmental indemnification agreement.

        Notwithstanding this settlement agreement, Rhodia and certain of its subsidiaries have unsuccessfully sought indemnification for environmental costs in the United States and Brazil. In both instances, the suits were decided in favor of Sanofi, with the court holding that the settlement precluded the indemnification claims. The decision in Brazil was under appeal by Rhodia. On September 6, 2011, the Court of Appeals rendered a decision favorable to Sanofi, confirming that the Environmental Settlement concluded in March 2003 precludes any claim from Rhodia in these matters. In 2012, Rhodia filed a motion for reconsideration of this decision before the Court of Appeals in Sao Paulo which was ultimately denied by anen banc decision of the same Court in February 2013. To date, the admissibility of Rhodia's recourse initiated against this decision is under consideration by the Court of Appeals in Sao Paulo.

        On April 13, 2005, Rhodia initiated anad hoc arbitration procedure seeking indemnification from Sanofi for the financial consequences of the environmental liabilities and pension obligations that were allocated to Rhodia through the various operations leading to the formation of Rhodia in 1997, amounting respectively to €125 million and €531 million. Rhodia additionally sought indemnification for future costs related to transferred environmental liabilities and coverage of all costs necessary to fully fund the transfer of pension liabilities out of Rhodia's accounts.

        The arbitral tribunal determined that it has no jurisdiction to rule on pension claims and that Rhodia's environmental claims are without merit. In May 2008, the Paris Court of Appeals rejected the action initiated by Rhodia to nullify the 2006 arbitral award in favor of Sanofi.

        On July 10, 2007, Sanofi was served with a civil suit brought by Rhodia before the Commercial Court of Paris (Tribunal de Commerce de Paris) seeking indemnification on the same grounds as described above. The allegations before the Commercial Court of Paris are comparable to those asserted in Rhodia's arbitration demand. On February 10, 2010, Rhodia submitted its pleadings brief (conclusions récapitulatives) in which it has asked the Court to hold that Sanofi was at fault in failing to provide Rhodia with sufficient capital to meet its pension obligations and environmental liabilities, and has claimed indemnification in the amount of €1.3 billion for retirement commitments and approximately €311 million for environmental liabilities. On December 14, 2011, the Commercial Court of Paris ruled in favor of Sanofi, rejecting all of Rhodia's allegations and claims. The Court of Appeals of Paris fully confirmed this decision in September 2013.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Commercial        In December 2013, Rhodia lodged a special appeal against this decision before the Supreme Court of Paris ruled in favor of Sanofi, rejecting all of Rhodia's allegations and claims. Rhodia has appealed this decision.France (Cour de Cassation). A ruling is awaited.

• Rhodia Shareholder Litigation

        In January 2004, two minority shareholders of Rhodia and their respective investment vehicles filed two claims before the Commercial Court of Paris (Tribunal de Commerce de Paris) against Aventis, to which Sanofi is successor in interest, together with other defendants including former directors and statutory auditors of Rhodia from the time of the alleged events. The claimants seek a judgment holding the defendants collectively liable for alleged management errors and for alleged publication of misstatements between 1999 and 2002, andinter alia regarding Rhodia's acquisition of the companies Albright & Wilson and ChiRex. These shareholders seek a finding of joint and several liability for damages to be awarded to Rhodia in an amount of €925 million for alleged harm to the Company (a derivative action), as well as personal claims of €4.3 million and €125.4 million for their own alleged individual losses. Sanofi contests both the substance and the admissibility of these claims.

        Sanofi is also aware of three criminal complaints filed in France by the same plaintiffs and of a criminal investigation order issued by the Paris public prosecutor following the submission of the report issued by theAutorité des Marchés Financiers AMF regarding Rhodia's financial communications. In 2006, the Commercial Court of Paris accepted Sanofi and the other defendants' motion to stay the civil litigation pending the conclusion of the criminal proceedings. The plaintiffs' appeals against this decision, first before the Court of Appeals, and then before the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation), were both rejected.

• Clariant Retained Liabilities — Specialty Chemicals Business

        Hoechst conveyed its specialty chemicals business to Clariant AG (Clariant) pursuant to a 1997 agreement. While Clariant has undertaken to indemnify Hoechst for all costs incurred for environmental matters relating to purchased sites, certain ongoing indemnification obligations of Hoechst for environmental matters in favor of Clariant can be summarized as follows:

• Infraserv Höchst Retained Liabilities

        By the Asset Contribution Agreement dated December 19/20, 1996, as amended in 1997, Hoechst contributed all lands, buildings, and related assets of the Hoechst site at Frankfurt-HöFrankfurt Höchst to Infraserv GmbH & Co. Höchst KG. Infraserv Höchst undertook to indemnify Hoechst against environmental liabilities at the Höchst site and with respect to certain landfills. As consideration for the indemnification undertaking, Hoechst transferred to Infraserv Höchst approximately €57 million to fund reserves. In 1997, Hoechst also agreed it would reimburse current and future Infraserv Höchst environmental expenses up to €143 million. As a former owner of the land and as a former user of the landfills, Hoechst may ultimately be liable for costs of remedial action in excess of this amount.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.23. Provisions for discounts, rebates and sales returnsPROVISIONS FOR DISCOUNTS, REBATES AND SALES RETURNS

        Adjustments between gross sales and net sales, as described in Note B.14., are recognized either as provisions or as reductions in accounts receivable, depending on their nature.

        The table below shows movements in these items:

(€ million)
 Government
and State
programs (2)

 Managed Care
and GPO
programs (3)

 Charge-
back
incentives

 Rebates and
discounts

 Sales
returns

 Other
deductions

 Total
 Government and
State programs(1)

 
Managed care and
GPO programs(2)

 
Chargeback
incentives

 
Rebates and
discounts

 
Sales
returns

 
Other
deductions

 
Total  
 
January 1, 2010 386 187 80 415 190 46 1,304 

Balance at January 1, 2012

780 203 160 975 390 96 2,604  
 
Current provision related to current period sales 937 410 1,246 3,058 357 127 6,135  1,734 522 2,368 4,514 471 261 9,870  
Net change in provision related to prior period sales (4) (11) 8 14 12 (4) 15  (56)(34)(22)9 (23)1 (125) 
Payments made (670) (400) (1,225) (2,804) (261) (126) (5,486) (1,443)(517)(2,345)(4,747)(386)(260)(9,698) 
Currency translation differences 17 15 6 36 19 5 98 
 
December 31, 2010 666 201 115 719 317 48 2,066 
 
Merial (1)   1 69 1 8 79 
Genzyme 7  4 132 39 12 194 
Current provision related to current period sales 1,224 496 1,569 4,159 349 152 7,949 
Net change in provision related to prior period sales (5) (35) 13 22 (5) (2) (12)
Payments made (1,132) (466) (1,548) (4,135) (322) (125) (7,728)
Currency translation differences 20 7 6 9 11 3 56 
 
December 31, 2011 780 203 160 975 390 96 2,604 
 
Current provision related to current period sales 1,713 522 2,368 4,574 432 261 9,870 
Net change in provision related to prior period sales (56) (34) (22) 9 (23) 1 (125)
Payments made (1,422) (517) (2,345) (4,807) (347) (260) (9,698)
Currency translation differences (15) (3) (3) 3 (10) (3) (31) (15)(3)(3)3 (10)(3)(31) 
 
Balance at December 31, 2012 1,000 171 158 754 442 95 2,620 1,000 171 158 754 442 95 2,620  
 

Current provision related to current period sales

 1,756 403 2,636 4,525 405 352 10,077  

Net change in provision related to prior period sales

 (77)  55 25 (4)(1) 

Payments made

 (1,804)(393)(2,594)(4,475)(522)(343)(10,131) 

Currency translation differences

 (32)(8)(9)(58)(22)(8)(137) 

Balance at December 31, 2013

843 173 191 801 328 92 2,428  

Current provision related to current period sales

 2,792 665 3,078 4,637 429 396 11,997  

Net change in provision related to prior period sales

 (60)26 (1)(36)(2) (73) 

Payments made

 (2,273)(586)(3,070)(4,584)(400)(438)(11,351) 

Currency translation differences

 137 34 23 6 38 8 246  

Balance at December 31, 2014

1,439 312 221 824 393 58 3,247  
(1)
Includes provisions for Merial customer rebates and returns, previously presented inLiabilities related to assets held for sale or exchange, reclassified following the announcement of the decision to maintain two separate entities (Merial and Intervet/Schering-Plough) operating independently (see notes D.2. and D.8.2.).
(2)
Primarily the U.S. government's Medicare and Medicaid programs.
(3)(2)
RebatesMainly rebates and other price reductions primarily granted to healthcare authorities in the United States.

D.24. PERSONNEL COSTS

        Total personnel costs break down as follows:

 

(€ million)

2014 2013 2012  
    

Salaries

 6,0566,040 6,151  
 

Social security charges (including defined-contribution pension plans)

 1,8961,880 1,883  
 

Stock options and other share-based payment expense

 217200 155  
 

Defined-benefit pension plans

 288261 158  
 

Other employee benefits

 208226 267  
 

Total

8,665 8,607 8,614  
    

        The total number of registered employees as of December 31, 2014 was 113,496, versus 112,128 as of December 31, 2013 and 111,974 as of December 31, 2012 (employee numbers are unaudited).


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.24. Personnel costs

        Total personnel costs break down as follows:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010 (1)

 
  
Salaries  6,151  5,940  5,121 
Social security charges (including defined-contribution pension plans)  1,883  1,716  1,555 
Stock options and other share-based payment expense  155  143  133 
Defined-benefit pension plans  212  358  340 
Other employee benefits  267  262  238 
  
Total  8,668  8,419  7,387 
  
(1)
Excluding Merial.

        The total number of employees at December 31, 2012 was 111,974, compared with 113,719 at December 31, 2011 and 101,575 at December 31, 2010 (these employee numbers are unaudited).

        Employee numbers by function as of December 31 are shown below (unaudited):below:

 
 December 31,
2012

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010 (1)

 
  
Production  45,035  44,415  37,504 
Research and development  17,066  18,823  16,983 
Sales force  32,270  32,874  32,686 
Marketing and support functions  17,603  17,607  14,402 
  
Total  111,974  113,719  101,575 
  
(1)
Excluding Merial.
 

2014 2013 2012  
    

Production

 44,36644,031 45,035  
 

Research and Development

 16,25716,688 17,066  
 

Sales force

 34,11833,509 32,270  
 

Marketing and Support Functions

 18,75517,900 17,603  
 

Total

113,496 112,128 111,974  
    

D.25. Other operating incomeOTHER OPERATING INCOME

        Other operating income totaled €327 million in 2014, versus €691 million in 2013 and €562 million in 2012, compared with €319 million in 2011 and €369 million in 2010.2012.

        This line includes income arising under alliance agreements in the Pharmaceuticals segment (€25847 million in 2012,2014, versus €202€191 million in 20112013 and €315€258 million in 2010)2012), in particular the agreement on the worldwide development and marketing of Actonel® (see Note C.3.) and the Group's share of profits on Copaxone®.

        In 2012, it also included the impact of the favorable outcome of litigation relating to a license.

        Other items recorded on this line includeoperating income also includes net operating foreign exchange gains and losses (representing net losses of €102 million in 2014, €64 million in 2013 and €41 million in 2012, €5 million in 2011 and €141 million in 2010)2012), and proceeds from disposals relatedrelating to ongoing operations (€59(amounting to €229 million in 2012, versus €562014, €345 million in 20112013 and €54€59 million in 2010)2012). The 2013 figure includes a U.S.$125 million payment received in connection with the expiry of the collaboration agreement with Warner Chilcott and a €165 million gain arising from the sale to Covis Pharma of the commercial rights to some pharmaceutical products in the United States.

D.26. Other operating expensesOTHER OPERATING EXPENSES

        Other operating expenses amounted to €454totaled €163 million in 2012, €3152014, compared with €241 million in 20112013 and €292€414 million in 2010.2012. This line item includes shares of profits due to alliance partners (other than BMS and the Alliance Partner under the Actonel® agreement) under product marketing agreements primarily in Europe, Japan, the United States and Canada (€6623 million in 2012,2014, versus €121€30 million in 20112013 and €169€66 million in 2010)2012).


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        In 2012, Sanofi paid $109this line item also included an expense of €116 million related to ramipril litigation in Canada, and a payment of U.S.$109 million in an out-of-court settlement with the office of the Massachusetts District Attorney, the U.S. Department of Justice and various other U.S. states to resolve all claims arising from the investigation into the distribution of samples of Hyalgan®, a former Sanofi product.

        Also included on this line is an additional provision of €116 million (before taxes) relating to litigation in Canada in respect of ramipril, recognized in 2012.

        Finally, this line includes an expense of €40 million in 2012 (versus €43 million in 2011) relating to pensions and other benefits for Group retirees.

D.27. Restructuring costsRESTRUCTURING COSTS

        Restructuring costs amounted tototaled €411 million in 2014, €300 million in 2013 and €1,141 million in 2012, versus €1,314 million in 2011 and €1,384 million in 2010, and break down as follows:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Employee-related expenses 860 840 817  260169 860  
Expenses related to property, plant and equipment 221 422 184  8946 221  
Compensation for early termination of contracts (other than contracts of employment) 7 27 35  2226 7  
Decontamination costs 2 22 105  (1)12 2  
Other restructuring costs 51 3 243  4147 51  
 
Total 1,141 1,314 1,384 411 300 1,141  
 

        These restructuringIn 2014 and 2013, these costs reflect measures announced byrelated mainly to employee-related expenses arising from headcount adjustment plans in France and the Group as partrest of the major transformation project initiated in 2009 to adapt the Group's structures to meet future challenges.Europe.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        In 2012, these costs includeincluded provisions of €646 million recognized in the year ended December 31, 2012 following the announcement of a realignment of the Group's resources in France. TheseThose measures covercovered changes in the scope of activities of the Group's Research and Development sites during the next three years, the reorganization of industrial facilities in the Vaccines segment, and the streamlining of the Group's support functions. The restructuringRestructuring costs recognized during the year also reflect the ongoing transformation of industrial facilities in Europe, adjustments to sales forces worldwide, and the integration of Genzyme. In addition, an impairment loss of €107 million was recognized against property, plant and equipment in France in connection with the reorganization of Research and Development operations.

        The restructuring costs recognized in 2011 primarily reflected the transformation and reorganization of Research and Development operations, measures taken to adapt the Group's industrial facilities in Europe, adjustments to the sales forces in the United States and Europe, the implementation of multi country organizations (MCOs) in Europe, and the integration of Genzyme entities worldwide.

        In 2010, restructuring costs related primarily to measures announced by the Group to continue transformation of its Research and Development operations, upgrade its chemical manufacturing sites to biotech and vaccine production, and reorganize its sales forces in the United States and Europe. These costs also included the impact of pension reforms on existing early retirement plans in France.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.28. Other gains and losses, and litigationOTHER GAINS AND LOSSES, AND LITIGATION

        Other gains and losses for the year ended December 31, 2011 included:

        In 2010, this line showed an expense of €138 million, relating to an adjustment to vendor's guarantee provisions in connection with past divestitures.

        The Group made no major divestitures in either 2012 or 2010.periods presented.

D.29. Financial income and expensesFINANCIAL INCOME AND EXPENSES

        Financial income and expenses break down as follows:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010

 2014 2013 2012  
 
Cost of debt (1) (417) (425) (385) (361)(366)(417) 
Interest income 68 100 61  68 49 68  
 
Cost of debt, net of cash and cash equivalents (349) (325) (324)(293)(317)(349) 
 
Non-operating foreign exchange gains/(losses) (17) 10 (20) 2 5 (17) 
Unwinding of discount on provisions (2) (87) (83) (68)

Unwinding of discounting of provisions(2)

 (74)(72)(87) 

Net interest cost related to employee benefits

 (142)(159)(198) 
Gains/(losses) on disposals of financial assets 37 25 61  83(3)50 37  
Impairment losses on financial assets, net of reversals (3) (30) (58) (6)

Impairment losses on financial assets, net of reversals

 (15)(8)(30) 
Other items (14) 19 (5) 27(4)(2)(14) 
 
Net financial income/(expenses) (460) (412) (362)

Net financial income/(expense)

(412)(503)(658) 
 
comprising: Financial expenses (553) (552) (468)(605)(612)(751) 
Financial income 93 140 106 193 109 93  
 
(1)
Includes gains/lossesa net gain on interest rate derivatives used to hedge debt: €84 million in 2014, €91 million in 2013, and €79 million gain in 2012, €47 million gain in 2011, €7 million gain in 2010.2012.
(2)
Primarily on provisions for environmental risks and restructuring provisions (see Note D.19.).
(3)
Primarily available-for-sale financial assets, including (€6)Mainly comprises a gain on the sale of an equity interest in Isis Pharmaceuticals (see Note D.7.).
(4)
Includes a €35 million for Greek government bondsgain arising on the purchase of an equity interest in 2012 (versus (€49) million in 2011)Alnylam, reflecting the difference between the value based on the quoted market price and the transaction price at the acquisition date (see Note D.7.).

        In 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, the impact of the ineffective portion of hedging relationships was not material.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.30. Income tax expenseINCOME TAX EXPENSE

        The Group has opted for tax consolidations in a number of countries, principally France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States.

        The table below shows the split of income tax expense between current and deferred taxes:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010

 2014 2013(1) 2012(1)  
 
Current taxes (2,050) (2,359) (2,929) (2,421)(1,775)(2,050) 
Deferred taxes 916 1,904 1,499  1,2501,012 942  
 
Total (1,134) (455) (1,430)(1,171)(763)(1,108) 
 

Income before tax and associates and joint ventures

5,731 4,602 5,772  
(1)
Includes the impact of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2.).

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        The difference between the effective tax rate and the standard corporate income tax rate applicable in France is explained as follows:

(as a percentage)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010

 
  
Standard tax rate applicable in France  34  34  34 
Difference between French tax rates and tax rates applicable to foreign subsidiaries (1)  (6) (3) (2)
Impact of reduced-rate income tax on royalties in France  (6) (11) (10)
Impact of change in net deferred tax liabilities as a result of changes in tax laws and rates (2)    (4)  
Tax rate differential on intragroup margin in inventory (3)  (1) (1)  
Impact of the Franco-American Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) 2006-2010 (4)    (7)  
Impact of tax borne by BMS for the territory managed by Sanofi (see Note D.32.)  (1) (1) (2)
Other items (5)  (1) 2  3 
  
Effective tax rate  19  9  23 
  
 

(as a percentage)

2014 2013(1) 2012(1)  
    

Standard tax rate applicable in France

 34.434.4 34.4  
 

Difference between the standard French tax rate and the rates applicable to the Group(2)

 (12.5)(11.7)(13.6) 
 

Tax rate differential on intragroup margin on inventory(3)

 (0.5)1.3 (1.1) 
 

Tax effects of the share of profits reverting to BMS (see Note D.32.)

 (0.7)(1.1)(0.6) 
 

Contribution on distributed income (3%)(4)

 1.92.4   
 

CVAE tax in France(5)

 0.91.3 1.2  
 

Re-estimates of tax exposures and settlements of tax disputes

 (2.7)(6.5)(1.0) 
 

Fair value remeasurement of contingent consideration liabilities

 0.4(2.8)0.9  
 

Other items(6)

 (0.8)(0.7)(1.0) 
 

Effective tax rate

20.4 16.6 19.2  
    
(1)
Includes the impact of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2.).
(2)
In 2012, this line includes the effects of an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the competent Japanese authorities covering the period from 2012 through 2014. The APA procedure is one in which tax authorities from one or more countries negotiate and conclude an agreement for a prospective period to determine transfer pricing methods applicable to transactions between subsidiaries of the same parent company. The remainder of the difference between the French tax rate and tax rates applicable to foreign subsidiaries reflects the fact that Sanofi has operations in many countries, most of which have lower tax rates than France.
(2)(3)
In 2011, this mainly involved changes to tax legislation in the United Kingdom.
(3)
When internal margin included in inventory is eliminated, a deferred tax asset is recognized on the basis of the tax rate applicable to the subsidiary that holds the inventory, which may differ from the tax rate of the subsidiary that generated the eliminated intragroup margin.
(4)
In December 2011, the French and U.S. governments signed an APA covering the period from 2006 through 2011.
(5)
The "Other" line includes in particular the impact of (i) the new CVAE (Cotisation sur la Valeur Ajoutée des Entreprises)Entities liable to corporate income tax in France are also liable to pay an additional tax contribution in respect of amounts distributed by the entity.
(5)
Net impact on the effective January 1, 2010, and (ii) the reassessment of sometax rate (current taxes, impact of the tax deduction, and deferred taxes).
(6)
"Other items" includes the net impact (current and deferred taxes) of the Contribution Exceptionnelle in France (10.7% in 2014 and 2013, 5% in 2012). That impact is immaterial at Group level. It also includes the net tax effect associated with holdings in the Group's tax risks.subsidiaries.

        For the periods presented, the amount of deferred tax assets recognized in profit or loss that were initially subject to impairment losses on a business combination is immaterial.

        Article 6 ofThe contribution on distributed income, for which the French Amending Finance Bill for 2012, enacted August 16, 2012, introduced an additional corporate income tax contribution of 3% on amounts distributed by French or foreign companies and entities that are subject to corporate income tax in France. This contribution, the trigger point for whichtriggering event is the decision by the shareholders' general meetingAnnual General Meeting to makeapprove the distribution, hasis not been taken into account in measuring the Group'sdetermination of deferred tax assets and liabilities. It will apply to future distributions of dividends by Sanofi.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.31. ShareSHARE OF PROFIT/LOSS OF ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURES

        Since the beginning of profit/lossApril 2014, this line item has included the share of associatesthe profits and joint ventureslosses of Regeneron, representing a net expense of €126 million for the period. That amount includes the impact of amortization charged on the fair value remeasurement of Sanofi's share of the acquired intangible assets and inventories of Regeneron.

        This line item mainly comprisesalso includes the share of co-promotion profits attributable to Sanofi for territories covered by entities majority-ownedmajority owned by BMS (see Note C.1.C.2.). The impact of the BMS alliance in 20122014 was €643€50 million, before deducting the tax effect of €223€19 million (versus €1,671(compared with €40 million in 2013 with a tax effect of €601€15 million, and €643 million in 2011, and €1,551 million2012 with a tax effect of €571 million in 2010)€223 million).

        It also includes the share of profits or losses from other associates and joint ventures, the amount of which was immaterial in 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010.2012.

D.32. Net income attributable to non-controlling interestsNET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

        This line item includes the share of co-promotion profits attributable to BMS for territories covered by entities majority-ownedmajority owned by Sanofi (see Note C.1.C.2.). The amountamounts involved waswere €109 million in 2014, €141 million in 2013 and €149 million in 2012, €226 million in 2011, and €237 million in 2010.2012. There is no tax effect, because BMS receives its share before tax.

        It also includes the share of net income attributable to other non-controlling interests (€20interests: €10 million in 2012, €15 million in 2011, and2014, €17 million in 2010).2013 and €20 million in 2012.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

D.33. Related party transactionsRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

        The principal related parties of Sanofi are companies over which the Group has control or significant influence, joint ventures, key management personnel, and principal shareholders.

        The Group has not entered into any transactions with any key management personnel. Financial relations with the Group's principal shareholders, in particular the Total group (until September 2012), fall within the ordinary course of business and were immaterial in the years ended December 31, 2012, December 31, 20112014, 2013 and December 31, 2010.2012.

        A list of the principal companies the Group controls is presented in Note F.1. TheseThose companies are fully consolidated (asas described in Note B.1.). Transactions between thesethose companies, and between the parent company and its subsidiaries, are eliminated when preparing the consolidated financial statements.

        Transactions with companies over which the Group has significant influence and with joint ventures are presented in Note D.6.

        Key management personnel include corporate officers (including two directors during 20122014, 2013 and 2011, and three directors in 2010,2012 who were covered by supplementary pension plans, see Item 6.B.) and the members of the Executive Committee (9(an average of 12 members during 2012, 2011in 2014, 10 members in 2013, and 2010)9 members in 2012).

        The table below shows, by type, the compensation paid to key management personnel:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010

 
  
Short-term benefits (1)  24  21  23 
Post-employment benefits  10  10  12 
Share-based payment (2)  8  5  6 
  
Total recognized in the income statement  42  36  41 
  
 

(€ million)

2014 2013 2012  
    

Short-term benefits(1)

 2922 24  
 

Post-employment benefits

 1011 10  
 

Share-based payment

 229 8  
 

Total recognized in profit or loss

61 42 42  
    
(1)
Compensation, employer's social security contributions, directors' attendance fees, and any termination benefits where applicable (net of reversals of obligation the case of termination benefits)benefit obligations).
(2)
Stock option expense computed using the Black-Scholes model.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        The aggregate amount of supplementary pension obligations to certain corporate officers and to members of the Executive Committee was €124 million as of December 31, 2014, versus €125 million as of December 31, 2013 and €162 million atas of December 31, 2012, compared with €121 million at December 31, 2011 and €130 million at December 31, 2010 (the increase is mainly due to a fall in discount rates during 2012).2012. The aggregate amount of termination and retirement benefits payable to certain corporate officers and key management personnel was €9 million as of December 31, 2014, compared with €5 million atas of December 31, 2012, 20112013 and 2010.December 31, 2012.

D.34. Split of net salesNET SALES AND CREDIT RISK

        Credit risk is the risk that customers (wholesalers, distributors, pharmacies, hospitals, clinics or government agencies) may fail to pay their debts. The Group manages credit risk by pre-vetting customers in order to set credit limits and risk levels and asking for guarantees or insurance where necessary, performing controls, and monitoring qualitative and quantitative indicators of accounts receivable balances such as the period of credit taken and overdue payments.

        Customer credit risk also arises as a result of the concentration of the Group's sales with its largest customers, in particular certain wholesalers in the United States. The Group's three largest customers respectively accounted for approximately 9.5%, 7.5% and 5.5% of gross revenues in 2014 (versus 7.2%, 5.6% and 5.2% in 2013, and 6.5%, 5.3% and 5.2% in 2012).

Net sales

        Sanofi's net sales comprise net sales generated by the Pharmaceuticals segment, the Vaccines segment and the Animal Health segment (see "Item 5. — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Results of gross revenues in 2012.Operations").


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

        The net sales of Sanofi comprise net sales generated by the Pharmaceuticals segment, the Vaccines segment and the Animal Health segment. The table below shows sales of flagship products and other major pharmaceutical products:

 
 Year ended December 31,
 
  
(€ million)
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  
Lantus®  4,960  3,916  3,510 
Apidra®  230  190  177 
Amaryl®  421  436  478 
Insuman®  135  132  133 
Other diabetes products  36  10   
  
Total: Diabetes  5,782  4,684  4,298 
  
Taxotere®  563  922  2,122 
Eloxatine®  956  1,071  427 
Jevtana®  235  188  82 
Zaltrap®  25     
Mozobil®  96  59   
Other Oncology products (1)  519  389  59 
  
Total: Oncology  2,394  2,629  2,690 
  
Lovenox®  1,893  2,111  2,806 
Plavix®  2,066  2,040  2,083 
Aprovel®/CoAprovel®  1,151  1,291  1,327 
Allegra®  553  580  607 
Stilnox®/Ambien®/Ambien® CR/Myslee®  497  490  819 
Copaxone®  24  436  513 
Depakine®  410  388  372 
Tritace®  345  375  410 
Multaq®  255  261  172 
Xatral®  130  200  296 
Actonel®  134  167  238 
Nasacort®  71  106  189 
Renagel®/Renvela® (1)  653  415   
Synvisc®/Synvisc-One® (1)  363  256   
  
Aubagio®  7     
  
Total: Multiple Sclerosis  7     
  
Cerezyme® (1)  633  441   
Myozyme®/Lumizyme® (1)  462  308   
Fabrazyme® (1)  292  109   
Other Rare Diseases products (1)  391  264   
  
Total: Rare Diseases (1)  1,778  1,122   
  
Total: New Genzyme (1)  1,785  1,122   
  
Other Products  5,513  5,927  6,005 
Consumer Health Care  3,008  2,666  2,217 
Generics  1,844  1,746  1,534 
  
Total: Pharmaceuticals  28,871  27,890  26,576 
  
(1)
In 2011, net sales of Genzyme products were recognized from the acquisition date (April 2011).

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Net sales of the principal product ranges of the Vaccines segment are shown below:

 
 Year ended December 31,
 
  
(€ million)
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  
Polio/Pertussis/Hib Vaccines  1,184  1,075  984 
Influenza Vaccines  884  826  1,297 
Meningitis/Pneumonia Vaccines  650  510  527 
Adult Booster Vaccines  496  465  449 
Travel and Endemics Vaccines  364  370  382 
Other Vaccines  319  223  169 
  
Total: Vaccines  3,897  3,469  3,808 
  

        Net sales of the principal product ranges of the Animal Health segment are shown below:

(€ million)
 2012
 2011
 2010
 
  
Frontline® and other fipronil-based products  775  764  774 
Vaccines  730  662  627 
Avermectin  423  372  355 
Other Animal Health products  251  232  227 
  
Total: Animal Health  2,179  2,030  1,983 
  

D.35. Segment informationSEGMENT INFORMATION

        As indicated in Note B.26., Sanofi has the following operating segments: Pharmaceuticals, Human Vaccines (Vaccines) and Animal Health. All other activities are combined in a separate segment, Other.

        In March 2011, Sanofi and Merck announced the mutual termination of their agreement to create a new Animal Health joint venture. Following this announcement, the Animal Health business was identified as an operating segment on the basis of information now used internally by management to measure operational performance and to allocate resources.

The Pharmaceuticals segment covers research, development, production and marketing of medicines, including those originating from Genzyme (see D.1.2.).Genzyme. The Sanofi pharmaceuticals portfolio consists of flagship products, plus a broad range of prescription medicines, generic medicines, and consumer health products. This segment also includes all associates whose activities are related to pharmaceuticals, in particular Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the entities majority owned by BMS.

        The Vaccines segment is wholly dedicated to vaccines, including research, development, production and marketing. This segment includes the Sanofi Pasteur MSD joint venture.

        The Animal Health segment comprises the research, development, production and marketing activities of Merial, which offers a complete range of medicines and vaccines for a wide variety of animal species.

        The Other segment includes all activities that do not qualify as reportable segments under IFRS 8. This segment includes Sanofi's interest in the Yves Rocher group until the date of loss of significant influence (see Note D.6.), and the effects of retained commitments in respect of divested activities.

        Inter-segment transactions are not material.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.35.1. Segment results

        Sanofi reports segment results on the basis of "Business operating income". This indicator (compliantis compliant with IFRS 8)8 and is used internally to measure operational performance and allocate resources.

        Business operating income is derived fromOperating income, adjusted as follows:


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

        Segment results are shown in the tablestable below:


 Year ended December 31, 2012
  2014  
 
(€ million)
 Pharmaceuticals
 Vaccines
 Animal Health
 Other
 Total
 Pharmaceuticals Vaccines Animal Health Other Total  
 
Net sales 28,871 3,897 2,179  34,947 

Net Sales

27,720 3,974 2,076  33,770  
Other revenues 933 44 33  1,010  272 33 34  339 
Cost of sales (8,759) (1,635) (701)  (11,095) (8,282)(1,948)(799) (11,029) 
Research and development expenses (4,219) (539) (164)  (4,922) (4,174)(493)(157) (4,824) 
Selling and general expenses (7,666) (611) (669) (1) (8,947) (7,692)(614)(682)(3)(8,991) 
Other operating income and expenses 98 (7) 3 14 108  194 2 20 (52)164 
Share of profit/(loss) of associates and joint ventures 432 (1) (7)  424  106 40 1  147 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests (171)  (1)  (172) (126) (1) (127) 
 
Business operating income 9,519 1,148 673 13 11,353 8,018 994 492 (55)9,449  
 


 2013(1)  
 

(€ million)

Pharmaceuticals Vaccines Animal Health Other Total  
    

Net Sales

27,250 3,716 1,985  32,951  
    

Other revenues

 295 30 30  355  
 

Cost of sales

 (8,518)(1,776)(689) (10,983) 
 

Research and development expenses

 (4,087)(518)(165) (4,770) 
 

Selling and general expenses

 (7,362)(588)(653) (8,603) 
 

Other operating income and expenses

 422 3 (1)26 450  
 

Share of profit/(loss) of associates and joint ventures

 48 41 (4) 85  
 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 (162)1 (1) (162) 
 

Business operating income

7,886 909 502 26 9,323  
    
(1)
Includes the impact of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2.).



 Year ended December 31, 2011
  2012(1)  
 
(€ million)
 Pharmaceuticals
 Vaccines
 Animal Health
 Other
 Total
 Pharmaceuticals Vaccines Animal Health Other Total  
 
Net sales 27,890 3,469 2,030  33,389 

Net Sales

28,871 3,897 2,179  34,947  
Other revenues 1,622 25 22  1,669  933 44 33  1,010  
Cost of sales (8,368) (1,404) (654)  (10,426) (8,745)(1,629)(701) (11,075) 
Research and development expenses (4,101) (564) (146)  (4,811) (4,203)(538)(164) (4,905) 
Selling and general expenses (7,376) (542) (617) (1) (8,536) (7,652)(609)(669)(1)(8,931) 
Other operating income and expenses (13)  (7) 24 4  134 (7)3 18 148  
Share of profit/(loss) of associates and joint ventures 1,088 1  13 1,102  432 (1)(7) 424  
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests (246)  (1)  (247) (171) (1) (172) 
 
Business operating income 10,496 985 627 36 12,144 9,599 1,157 673 17 11,446  
 
(1)
Includes the impact of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2.).

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)


 
 Year ended December 31, 2010
 
  
(€ million)
 Pharmaceuticals
 Vaccines
 Animal Health
 Other
 Total
 
  
Net sales  26,576  3,808  1,983    32,367 
Other revenues  1,623  28  18    1,669 
Cost of sales  (7,316) (1,371) (615)   (9,302)
Research and development expenses  (3,884) (517) (155)   (4,556)
Selling and general expenses  (6,962) (603) (604) (2) (8,171)
Other operating income and expenses  177  14  (6) (108) 77 
Share of profit/(loss) of associates and joint ventures  1,009  19    8  1,036 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests  (258) 1      (257)
  
Business operating income  10,965  1,379  621  (102) 12,863 
  

        The table below, presented in compliance with IFRS 8, shows thea reconciliation between "Business netoperating income" andIncome before tax and associates and joint ventures:ventures:

(€ million)
 Year ended
December 31,
2012

 Year ended
December 31,
2011

 Year ended
December 31,
2010

 2014 2013(1) 2012(1)  
 
Business operating income 11,353 12,144 12,863 9,449 9,323 11,446  
 
Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures (1) (424) (1,102) (1,036)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests (2) 172 247 257 

Share of profit/(loss) of associates and joint ventures(2)

 (147)(85)(424) 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests(3)

 127162 172  
Amortization of intangible assets (3,291) (3,314) (3,529) (2,482)(2,914)(3,291) 
Impairment of intangible assets (117) (142) (433) 26(1,387)(117) 
Fair value remeasurement of contingent consideration liabilities (192) 15   (303)314 (192) 
Expenses arising from the impact of acquisitions on inventories (3) (23) (476) (142)

Expenses arising from the impact of acquisitions on inventories(4)

 (8)(23) 
Restructuring costs (1,141) (1,314) (1,384) (411)(300)(1,141) 
Other gains and losses, and litigation (4)  (327) (138)
Impact of the discontinuation of depreciation of the property, plant and equipment of Merial (IFRS 5)   77 

Additional expense related to US Branded Prescription Drug Fee(5)

 (116)   
 
Operating income 6,337 5 731 6,535 6,143 5,105 6,430  
 
Financial expense (553) (552) (468)

Financial expenses

 (605)(612)(751) 
Financial income 93 140 106  193109 93  
 
Income before tax and associates and joint ventures 5,877 5,319 6,173 5,731 4,602 5,772  
 
(1)
Includes the impact of applying IFRIC 21 (see Note A.2.2.).
(2)
Excluding (i) restructuring costs of associates and joint ventures and (ii) expenses arising from the impact of acquisitions on associates and joint ventures.
(2)(3)
Excluding the share attributable to non-controlling interests of (i) restructuring costs and (ii) other adjustments.adjustments attributable to non-controlling interests.
(3)(4)
This lines recordline records the impact of the workdown of acquired inventories remeasured at fair value at the acquisition date.
(4)(5)
See Note D.28.Annual fee relating to 2013 sales: the IRS reforms of July 2014 altered the date on which the liability is recognized, such that the expense recognized during 2014 was based on both 2013 and 2014 sales.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

D.35.2. Other segment information

        The tables below show the split by operating segment of (i) the carrying amount of investments in associates and joint ventures, (ii) acquisitions of property, plant and equipment, and (iii) acquisitions of intangible assets.

        The principal associates and joint ventures are: for the Pharmaceuticals segment, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (see Note D.1.1.), the entities majority owned by BMS (see Note C.1.C.2.), Handok (divested October 30, 2012), Infraserv GmbH & Co. Höchst KG, and Handok (divested October 30, 2012); and for the Vaccines segment, Sanofi Pasteur MSD. The Other segment includes the associate Yves Rocher, which ceased to be accounted for by the equity method effective November 2011 (see note D.6.).

        Acquisitions of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment correspond to acquisitions madepaid for during the period.


 2012
  2014  
 
(€ million)
 Pharmaceuticals
 Vaccines
 Animal
Health

 Other
 Total
 Pharmaceuticals Vaccines Animal Health Total  
 
Investments in associates and joint ventures 192 292 3  487  2,115 264 5 2,384 
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment 1,024 216 79  1,319 
Acquisitions of intangible assets 276 9 8  293 
 

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

 787 217 81 1,085 

Acquisition of other intangible assets

 435 49 23 507 


 
 2011
 
  
(€ million)
 Pharmaceuticals
 Vaccines
 Animal
Health

 Other
 Total
 
  
Investments in associates and joint ventures  488  319      807 
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment  1,136  323  77    1,536 
Acquisitions of intangible assets  223  8  15    246 
  



 2010
  2013  
 
(€ million)
 Pharmaceuticals
 Vaccines
 Animal
Health

 Other
 Total
 Pharmaceuticals Vaccines Animal Health Total  
 
Investments in associates and joint ventures 446 350  128 924  163 281 4 448  
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment 779 416 88  1,283 
Acquisitions of intangible assets 335 43 1  379 
 

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

 820 205 71 1,096  

Acquisition of other intangible assets

 264 17 21 302  

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)


 2012  
 

(€ million)

Pharmaceuticals Vaccines Animal Health Total  
    

Investments in associates and joint ventures

 192 292 3 487  
 

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

 1,024 216 79 1,319  
 

Acquisition of other intangible assets

 276 9 8 293  
 

D.35.3. Information by geographical region

        The geographical information on net sales provided below is based on the geographical location of the customer.

In accordance with IFRS 8, the non-current assets reported below exclude financial instruments, deferred tax assets, and pre-funded pension obligations.


 2012
  2014  
 
(€ million)
 Total
 Europe
 of which
France

 North
America

 of which
United States

 Other
countries

 Total Europe Of which
France

 
North
America

 
Of which
United States

 
Other
Countries

 
 
 
Net sales 34,947 11,056 2,846 11,440 10,873 12,451 33,770 10,406 2,474 11,911 11,339 11,453  
Non-current assets:              

• property, plant and equipment

 10,578 6,707 4,073 2,696 2,285 1,175  10,3966,330 3,848 2,830 2,428 1,236  

• intangible assets

 20,192 4,417   11,400   4,375 

• goodwill

 38,073 15,025   15,994   7,054 
 

• goodwill(1)

 37,84115,021   15,939   6,881  

• other intangible assets

 14,5432,907   8,600   3,036  
(1)
Excluding the goodwill allocated in full to the Animal Health segment (see Note D.5.).



 2011
  2013  
 
(€ million)
 Total
 Europe
 of which
France

 North
America

 of which
United States

 Other
countries

 Total Europe Of which
France

 
North
America

 
Of which
United States

 
Other
Countries

 
 
 
Net sales 33,389 11,796 3,106 10,511 9,957 11,082 32,951 10,504 2,571 11,006 10,433 11,441  
Non-current assets:               

• property, plant and equipment

 10,750 6,857 4,128 2,768 2,374 1,125  10,182 6,509 3,969 2,553 2,186 1,120  

• intangible assets

 23,639 5,537   15,422   2,680 

• goodwill (1)

 38,582 15,238   16,365   6,979  35,939 15,023   14,072   6,844  
 

• other intangible assets

 15,395 3,531   8,256   3,608  
(1)
In accordance with IFRS 3 (Business Combinations), Sanofi made adjustments duringExcluding the Genzyme purchase price allocation periodgoodwill allocated in full to some of the provisional amounts recognized in 2011Animal Health segment (see Note D.1.2.D.5.).


 2010
  2012  
 
(€ million)
 Total
 Europe
 of which
France

 North
America

 of which
United States

 Other
countries

 Total Europe of which
France

 
North
America

 
of which
United States

 
Other
Countries

 
 
 
Net sales 32,367 12,198 3,092 10,333 9,790 9,836 34,947 11,056 2,846 11,440 10,873 12,451  
Non-current assets:               

• property, plant and equipment

 8,155 5,764 3,603 1,510 1,091 881  10,578 6,707 4,073 2,696 2,285 1,175  

• intangible assets

 12,479 3,773   5,835   2,871 

• goodwill

 31,932 13,718   13,264   4,950 
 

• goodwill(1)

 36,840 15,025   14,761   7,054  

• other intangible assets

 20,192 4,417   11,400   4,375  
(1)
Excluding the goodwill allocated in full to the Animal Health segment (see Note D.5.).

        In accordance withAs stated in Notes B.6.1. and D.5. to the consolidated financial statements, France is not a cash-generating unit. Consequently, information about goodwill is provided for Europe.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)


E. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS' FEES AND SERVICES
E/ Principal accountants' fees and services

        PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit and Ernst & Young et Autres served as independent auditors of Sanofi for the year ended December 31, 20122014 and for all other reporting periods covered by this annual report on Form 20-F.presented. The table below shows fees charged by thesethose firms and member firms of their networks to Sanofi and other consolidated subsidiaries in the years ended December 31, 20122014 and 2011.2013:

 
 Ernst & Young
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
 
  
 
 2012
 2011
 2012
 2011
 
  
(€ million)
 Amount
 %
 Amount
 %
 Amount
 %
 Amount
 %
 
  
Audit:                         
Audit opinion, review of statutory and consolidated financial statements (1)  15.4  96%  13.6  92%  15.6  92%  17.9  91% 

– Sanofi S.A

  3.9     3.5     4.0     4.1    

– fully consolidated
               subsidiaries

  11.5     10.1     11.6     13.8    
Other audit-related services (2)  0.5  3%  1.0  7%  1.2  7%  1.3  7% 

– Sanofi S.A

       0.3     0.3     0.9    

– fully consolidated
               subsidiaries

  0.5     0.7     0.9     0.4    
Sub-total (3)  15.9  99%  14.6  99%  16.8  99%  19.2  98% 
  
Non-audit services:                         
Tax  0.1     0.1     0.1     0.4    
Other                     
Sub-total  0.1  1%  0.1  1%  0.1  1%  0.4  2% 
  
TOTAL  16.0  100%  14.7  100%  16.9  100%  19.6  100% 
  

 Ernst & Young  PricewaterhouseCoopers  
 

2014

 2013

 2014

 2013

 

(€ million)

 
Amount

 

%

 

Amount

 

%

 

Amount

 

%

 

Amount

 

%

 
 
    

Audit:

                 
 

Audit opinion, review of statutory and consolidated financial statements(1)

 16.392% 16.2 96% 15.7 93% 14.7 95%  
 

•  Sanofi SA

 4.0  3.7   4.2   3.9    
 

•  Fully consolidated subsidiaries

 12.3  12.5   11.5   10.8    
 

Other audit-related services(2)

 1.58% 0.7 4% 1.0 6% 0.6 4%  
 

•  Sanofi SA

 0.5  0.2   0.2   0.2    
 

•  Fully consolidated subsidiaries

 1.0  0.5   0.8   0.4    
 

Sub-total

17.8 100% 16.9 100% 16.7 99% 15.3 99%  
    

Non-audit services:

                 
 

Tax

      0.2   0.2    
 

Other

             
 

Sub-total

    0.2 1% 0.2 1%  
    

Total

17.8 100% 16.9 100% 16.9 100% 15.5 100%  
    
(1)
Professional services rendered for the audit and review of the consolidated financial statements of Sanofi and statutory audits of the financial statements of Sanofi and its subsidiaries, compliance with local regulations, and review of documents filed with the AMF and the SEC (including services provided by independent experts belonging to the audit firmsstatutory auditors' network in connection with the audit).
(2)
Services that are normally performed by the independent accountants, ancillary to audit services.
(3)
Does not include contractual audit fees for U.S. pension plans ((401 k plans), which amounted to €0.4 million in 2012).

Audit Committee Pre-approval and Procedures

        The Group Audit Committee has adopted a policy and established certain procedures for the approval of audit and other permitted audit-relatedaudit related services, and for the pre-approval of permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors. In 2012,2014, the Audit Committee established a budget breaking down permitted audit-relatedaudit related services and non-audit services by type of service, and the related fees to be paid.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)

F. LIST OF PRINCIPAL COMPANIES INCLUDED IN THE CONSOLIDATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBERF/ List of principal companies included in the consolidation for the year ended December 31, 2012
2014

F.1. Principal fully consolidated companiesPRINCIPAL FULLY CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES

        The principal companies in the Group's areas of operations and business segments are:

Europe


Financial interest
%

  

Aventis Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH

 Germany 100100 

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

 Germany 100100 

Hoechst GmbH

 Germany 100100 
Winthrop Arzneimittel

Zentiva Pharma GmbH

 Germany 100100 

Zentiva Inhalationsprodukte GmbH

 Germany 100100 

Merial GmbH

 Germany 100100 

Genzyme GmbH

 Germany 100100 

Sanofi-Aventis GmbH Bristol-Myers Squibb GesmbH OHG (1)

 Austria 10050.1 
Sanofi-Aventis GmbHAustria100 
Sanofi-Aventis

Sanofi Belgium S.A.N.V.

 Belgium 100100 

Sanofi European Treasury Center

 Belgium 100100 

Genzyme Flanders BVBA

 Belgium 100100 

Merial Norden A/S

 Denmark 100100 

Sanofi-Aventis Denmark A/S

 Denmark 100100 
Sanofi Winthrop BMS partnership (JV DK) (1)Denmark50.1 

Merial Laboratorios S.A. SA

 Spain 100100 

Sanofi-Aventis SA

 Spain 100100 

Sanofi-aventis Bms Ay (1)Sanofi-Aventis OY

 Finland 10050.1 
Sanofi-Aventis OYFinland100 

Sanofi-Aventis Europe

 France 100100 

Sanofi-Aventis Participations

 France 100100 

Sanofi Pasteur Participations

 France 100100 

Sanofi-Aventis Amérique du Nord

 France 100100 

Sanofi Pasteur Holding

 France 100100 

Aventis Pharma S.A.

 France 100100 

Sanofi Pasteur

 France 100100 

Aventis Agriculture

 France 100100 

Fovea Pharmaceuticals

 France 100100 

Francopia

 France 100100 

Winthrop Médicaments

 France 100100 

Sanofi Chimie

 France 100100 

Sanofi Participations

 France 100100 

Sanofi Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb (1)SANOFI CLIR

 France 50.150.1 

Sanofi

 France 100100 
Sanofi-Aventis

Sanofi-aventis France

 France 100100 
Sanofi-Aventis

Sanofi-aventis Groupe

 France 100100 

Sanofi-Aventis Recherche et& Développement

 France 100100 

Sanofi Winthrop Industrie

 France 100100 
Merial

MERIAL SAS

 France 100100 

Genzyme SAS

 France 100100 

Genzyme Polyclonals SAS

 France 100100 

Chattem Greece S.A. SA

 Greece 100100 
sanofi-aventis

Sanofi-Aventis A.E.B.E.

 Greece 100100 
 
(1)
Partnership with Bristol-Myers Squibb (see Note C.1.).

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Europe

Financial interest
%

Chinoin Private Co.Co, Ltd

 Hungary 99.699.6 

SANOFI-AVENTIS Private Co.Co, Ltd

 Hungary 99.699.6 
Chattem Global Consumer Products

Sanofi-Aventis Ireland Limited

 Ireland 100
Carraig Insurance LtdIreland100
Sanofi-Aventis Ireland LimitedIreland100
Genzyme Ireland LimitedIreland100
Merial Italia S.p.A. Italy100
sanofi-aventis SpAItaly100
Sanofi-aventis Norge ASNorway100
Sanofi Winthrop BMS partnership Ans (NO) (1)Norway50.1
sanofi-aventis Netherlands B.V. Netherlands100
Sanofi Winthrop Bms Vof (Netherlands) (1)Netherlands50.1
Genzyme Europe BVNetherlands100
Sanofi-Aventis Sp z.o.o. Poland100
Winthrop Farmaceutica Portugal, LdaPortugal100
Sanofi — Produtos Pharmaceuticos LdaPortugal100
Sanofi Winthrop BMS — AEIE (Portugal) (1)Portugal50.1
Sanofi-Aventis, s.r.o. Czech Republic100
Zentiva Group, a.s. Czech Republic100
Zentiva k.s. Czech Republic100
Sanofi-Aventis Romania SRLRomania100
Aventis Pharma LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Chattem Limited (U.K.)United Kingdom100
Sanofi-Aventis UK Holdings LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Sanofi Pasteur Holding LtdUnited Kingdom100
Sanofi-Synthelabo LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Sanofi-Synthelabo UK LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Winthrop Pharmaceuticals UK LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Fisons LimitedUnited Kingdom100
May and Baker LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Genzyme LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Merial LimitedUnited Kingdom100
Merial Animal Health LtdUnited Kingdom100
ZAO Aventis PharmaRussia100
Sanofi-aventis VostokRussia51
Zentiva Pharma o.o.o. Russia100
sanofi-aventis Pharma Slovakia s.r.o. Slovakia100
Zentiva a.s., HlohovecSlovakia98.8
Sanofi-Aventis ABSweden100
Sanofi SASwitzerland100
Sanofi-Aventis (Suisse) SASwitzerland100
Sanofi-Aventis Ilaclari SirketiTurkey100
Winthrop Ilac Anonim SirketiTurkey100
Sanofi-Synthelabo Ilac AsTurkey100
Zentiva Saglik UrunleriTurkey100
Limited Liability Company Sanofi-aventis UkraineUkraine100
(1)
Partnership with Bristol-Myers Squibb (see Note C.1.).

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

United States

Financial interest
%

  
Armour Pharmaceutical Company (US)United States100
Aventis Inc. (US)United States100
Aventisub Inc. (US)United States100
Aventis Holdings Inc. (US)United States100
Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (US)United States100
BiPar Sciences Inc. United States100
Carderm Capital L.P. (US)United States100
Chattem Inc. United States100
Merial, LimitedUnited States100
Merial Select, Inc. United States100
Sanofi US Services Inc. United States100
Sanofi-Aventis US LLCUnited States100
Sanofi Pasteur Biologics, LLCUnited States100
Sanofi Pasteur Inc. (US)United States100
Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. United States100
Sundex, LLCUnited States100
TargeGen Inc. United States100
Sanofi Pasteur VaxDesign CorporationUnited States100
BMP Sunstone Corporation (US)United States100
Genzyme CorporationUnited States100
Sanofi-Topaz Inc. United States100
VaxServe, Inc. (US)United States100
 

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Other countriesEurope


Financial interest
%

  
Sanofi-Aventis South Africa (Pty)

Carraig Insurance Ltd

 South AfricaIreland 100 
Winthrop Pharmaceuticals (Pty)

Genzyme Ireland Limited

 South AfricaIreland 100 
Winthrop Pharma Saïdal S.P.A. Algeria70 
Sanofi-Aventis Algérie

Merial Italia S.p.A.

 AlgeriaItaly 100 
Merial Argentina S.A. 

Sanofi-Aventis S.p.A.

 ArgentinaItaly 100 
Sanofi-Aventis Argentina S.A. 

Genzyme Global Sarl

 ArgentinaLuxembourg 100 
Quimica Medical Argentina Sociedad Anonima Comercial E Industrial

Sanofi-aventis Norge AS

 ArgentinaNorway 100 
Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Limited

Genzyme Europe B.V.

 AustraliaNetherlands 100 
Sanofi-aventis Healthcare Holdings Pty Ltd

Sanofi-Aventis Netherlands B.V.

 AustraliaNetherlands 100 
Sanofi-aventis Healthcare Pty Ltd

Sanofi-Aventis Sp z.o.o.

 AustraliaPoland 100 
Bullivant's Natural Health Products (International) Pty Ltd

Winthrop Farmaceutica Portugal, Lda

 AustraliaPortugal 100 
Bullivant's Natural Health Products Pty Ltd

Sanofi — Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda

 AustraliaPortugal 100 
CENOVIS Pty Ltd

Sanofi-Aventis, s.r.o.

 AustraliaCzech. Rep. 100 
MCP Direct Pty Ltd

Zentiva Group, a.s.

 AustraliaCzech. Rep. 100 
Carlson Health Pty Ltd

Zentiva, k.s.

 AustraliaCzech. Rep. 100 
Merial Australia Pty, Ltd

Sanofi-Aventis Romania SRL

 AustraliaRomania 100 
MERIAL SAUDE ANIMAL LTDA

Aventis Pharma Limited

 BrazilUnited Kingdom 100 
Sanofi-Aventis Comercial e Logistica Ltda

Chattem Limited (UK)

 BrazilUnited Kingdom 100 

Sanofi-Aventis Farmaceutica LtdaUK Holdings Limited

 BrazilUnited Kingdom 100 
Medley Comercial e Logistica Ltda

Sanofi Pasteur Holding Limited

 BrazilUnited Kingdom 100 
Medley Industria Farmaceutica Ltda

Sanofi-Synthelabo Limited

 BrazilUnited Kingdom 100 
Merial Canada, Inc. 

Fisons Limited

 CanadaUnited Kingdom 100 
Sanofi Pasteur

May and Baker Limited (Canada)

 CanadaUnited Kingdom 100 
Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. 

Genzyme Limited

 CanadaUnited Kingdom 100 
Sanofi Consumer Health Inc./Sanofi Santé Grand Public Inc. 

Merial Limited

 CanadaUnited Kingdom 100 
Sanofi-Aventis de Chile SA

Merial Animal Health Ltd

 ChileUnited Kingdom 100 

ZAO Sanofi China Investment Co., Ltd. Russia

 ChinaRussia 100 
Sanofi (Beijing) Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd

CJSC Sanofi-Aventis Vostok

 ChinaRussia 74

Limited Liability Zentiva Pharma

Russia 100 
Sanofi (Hangzhou) Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd

Sanofi-Aventis Pharma Slovakia s.r.o.

 ChinaSlovakia 100 
Shenzhen Sanofi Pasteur Biological Products Co. Ltd

Zentiva a.s.

 ChinaSlovakia 98.9

Sanofi-Aventis AB

Sweden 100 
Hangzhou Sanofi Minsheng Consumer Healthcare Co., LtdChina60 
MERIAL ANIMAL HEALTH CO. LTD

Sanofi SA (Sanofi AG)

 China99
Sunstone Fulai (Tangshan) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ChinaSwitzerland 100 
Winthrop Pharmaceuticals de Colombia

Sanofi-Aventis (Suisse) SA

 ColombiaSwitzerland 100 

Sanofi-Aventis de Colombia S.AIlaclari Limited Sirketi

 ColombiaTurkey 100 
sanofi-aventis Korea

Sanofi-Synthelabo Ilac A.S.

 KoreaTurkey 100 
Sanofi-Aventis Gulf F.Z.E. 

Zentiva Saglik Urunleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.

 United Arab EmiratesTurkey 100 
Sanofi Egypt S.A.EEgypt99.8 
Sanofi-Aventis del Ecuador S.A

Sanofi Pasteur Asi Ticaret A.S.

 EcuadorTurkey 100 
sanofi-aventis de Guatemala S.A. 

Sanofi-Aventis Ukraine

 GuatemalaUkraine 100 
Sunstone China limitedHong Kong100 
Sanofi-aventis Hong Kong LimitedHong Kong100
Sanofi-Synthelabo (India) LtdIndia100
Sanofi India LimitedIndia60.4
Shantha BiotechnicsIndia97
PT SANOFI AVENTIS INDONESIAIndonesia100
PT Aventis PharmaIndonesia75
Sanofi K.K. Japan100
 

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS — (Continued)


United States

Financial interest %

Armour Pharmaceutical Company

United States100

Aventis Inc.

United States100

Aventisub LLC

United States100

BiPar Sciences, Inc.

United States100

Carderm Capital L.P.

United States100

Chattem, Inc.

United States100

Merial, Inc

United States100

Sanofi US Services Inc.

United States100

Sanofi-Aventis US LLC

United States100

Sanofi Pasteur Biologics, LLC

United States100

Sanofi Pasteur Inc.

United States100

Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc.

United States100

TargeGen Inc.

United States100

Sanofi Pasteur VaxDesign Corporation

United States100

BMP Sunstone Corporation

United States100

Genzyme Corporation

United States100

Sanofi-Topaz, Inc.

United States100

VaxServe, Inc.

United States100


Other Countries

Financial interest %

Sanofi-Aventis South Africa (Pty) Ltd

South Africa100

Zentiva South Africa (Pty) Ltd

South Africa100

Winthrop Pharma Saïdal S.P.A.

Algeria70

Sanofi-Aventis Algérie

Algeria100

Merial Argentina SA

Argentina100

Sanofi-Aventis Argentina SA

Argentina100

Genzyme de Argentina SA

Argentina100

Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Limited

Australia100

Sanofi-Aventis Healthcare Holdings Pty Ltd

Australia100

Sanofi-Aventis Healthcare Pty Ltd

Australia100

MCP Direct Pty Ltd

Australia100

Merial Australia Pty, Ltd

Australia100

Merial Saude Animal Ltda

Brazil100

Sanofi-Aventis Farmacêutica Ltda

Brazil100

Medley Farmacêutica Ltda

Brazil100

Merial Canada, Inc.

Canada100

Sanofi Pasteur Limited (Canada)

Canada100

Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc.

Canada100

Sanofi Consumer Health Inc./Sanofi Santé Grand Public Inc.

Canada100

Sanofi-Aventis de Chile SA

Chile100

Sanofi China Investment Co., Ltd

China100

Sanofi (Beijing) Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

China100

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Other Countries

Financial interest %

Sanofi (Hangzhou) Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd

China100

Shenzhen Sanofi Pasteur Biological Products Co., Ltd

China100

Hangzhou Sanofi Minsheng Consumer Healthcare Co., Ltd

China60

MERIAL ANIMAL HEALTH CO. LTD

China99

Genfar S.A.

Colombia100

Winthrop Pharmaceuticals de Colombia S.A.

Colombia100

Sanofi-Aventis de Colombia S.A.

Colombia100

Sanofi-Aventis Korea

South Korea100

Genzyme Korea Co Ltd

South Korea100

Sanofi-Aventis Gulf F.Z.E.

United Arab Emirates100

Sanofi Egypt S.A.E.

Egypt99.8

Sanofi-Aventis del Ecuador S.A.

Ecuador100

Sanofi-Aventis de Guatemala S.A.

Guatemala100

Sunstone China limited

Hong Kong100

Sanofi-Aventis Hong Kong Limited

Hong Kong100

Sanofi-Synthelabo (India) Ltd

India100

Sanofi India Limited

India60.4

Shantha Biotechnics Private Ltd

India97

PT. Sanofi-aventis Indonesia

Indonesia100

PT Aventis Pharma

Indonesia75

Sanofi-Aventis Israël Ltd

Israel100

Sanofi K.K.

Japan100

Merial Japan Ltd

Japan80

Genzyme JP KK

Japan100

Winthrop Pharmaceuticals (Malaysia) SDN-BHD

Malaysia100

Sanofi-Aventis (Malaysia) SDN BHD

Malaysia100

Maphar

Morocco80.6

Sanofi-Aventis Maroc

Morocco100

Merial de Mexico, SA de CV

Mexico100

Sanofi Pasteur SA de CV

Mexico100

Sanofi-Aventis de Mexico SA de CV

Mexico100

Sanofi-Aventis Winthrop SA de CV

Mexico100

Sanofi-Aventis Pakistan

Pakistan52.9

Sanofi-Aventis de Panama S.A.

Panama100

Sanofi-Aventis Latin America S.A.

Panama100

Sanofi-Aventis del Peru S.A.

Peru100

Genfar Peru S.A.

Peru100

Sanofi-Aventis Philippines Inc.

Philippines100

Sanofi-Aventis de la Republica Dominicana SA

Dominican Rep.100

Aventis Pharma (Manufacturing) Pte Ltd

Singapore100

Sanofi-Aventis Singapore Pte Ltd

Singapore100

Sanofi Taiwan Co Ltd

Taiwan100

Zentiva (Thailand) Ltd

Thailand100

Sanofi-Aventis (Thailand) Ltd

Thailand100

Sanofi-Aventis Pharma Tunisie

Tunisia100

Winthrop Pharma Tunisie

Tunisia100

Sanofi-Aventis de Venezuela SA

Venezuela100

Sanofi-Synthelabo Vietnam

Vietnam70

Sanofi Vietnam Shareholding Company

Vietnam100

Table of Contents


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

F.2. PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURES

Other countries

Financial interest
%

  
Sanofi-Aventis Meiji Pharmaceuticals Co., LtdJapan51 
Sanofi Pasteur Kabushiki KaishaJapan100
Merial JAPAN LTDJapan80
Genzyme JP KKJapan100
Winthrop Pharmaceuticals (Malaysia) SDN-BHDMalaysia100
Sanofi-Aventis (Malaysia) Sdn BhdMalaysia100
MapharMorocco80.6
Sanofi-Aventis MarocMorocco100
Merial de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Mexico100
Sanofi Pasteur SA de CV (Mexico)Mexico100
Sanofi-Aventis de Mexico S.A de CVMexico100
Sanofi-Aventis Winthrop SA de CVMexico100
Laboratorios Kendrick S.A. Mexico100
Sanofi Aventis PakistanPakistan52.9
Sanofi-Aventis de Panama S.A. Panama100
Sanofi-Aventis Latin America SAPanama100
sanofi-aventis del Peru SAPeru100
Chattem Peru S.R.L. Peru100
Sanofi-Aventis Philippines IncPhilippines100
Sanofi-Aventis de la Republica Dominicana S.A. Dominican Rep.100
Aventis Pharma (Manufacturing) Pte. LtdSingapore100
Sanofi-Aventis Singapore Pte LtdSingapore100
Sanofi Taiwan Co LtdTaiwan100
Sanofi-Synthélabo (Thailand) LtdThailand100
sanofi-aventis (Thailand) ltdThailand100
Sanofi-Aventis Pharma TunisieTunisia100
Winthrop Pharma TunisieTunisia100
Sanofi-Aventis de Venezuela SAVenezuela100
Sanofi-Synthélabo Vietnam Pharmaceutical Shareholding CompanyVietnam70
sanofi-aventis Vietnam Company LimitedVietnam100

        The Group has also consolidated Merial and its subsidiaries since September 18, 2009, the date on which control was acquired (see Note D.8.2.).

F.2. Principal associates and joint ventures



Financial interest
%

Infraserv GmbH & Co, Höchst KG

 Germany 31.231.2 

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Squibb / Sanofi Canada Partnership

 Canada 49.949.9 

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Squibb / Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership

 United States 49.949.9 

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Squibb / Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Partnership

 United States 49.949.9 

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Squibb / Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Partnership Puerto Rico

 United States 49.949.9 

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Squibb / Sanofi-Synthélabo Partnership

 United States 49.949.9 

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Squibb / Sanofi-Synthélabo Puerto Rico Partnership

 United States 49.949.9 

Sanofi Pasteur MSD

 France 5050 
 

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

United States22.3