SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________
OR
OR
OR
LONCOR RESOURCESGOLD INC.
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation of Organization)
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)
First Canadian
Place, 100 King Street West, Suite 7070, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile Number and Address of Company Contact Person)
None
Common Shares
None
2021:
Yes [ ] No [
Yes
Yes [ ] No [ ]
| Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [ ] | Non-accelerated filer [ |
| Emerging growth company [X] |
| U.S. GAAP [ ] | International Financial Reporting Standards | Other [ ] |
| Accounting Standards Board [ |
[ ] Item 17
Yes [ ] No
LONCOR RESOURCESGOLD INC. - FORM 20-F
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | |||
| CAUTIONARY | 1 | ||
| 2 | |||
| CURRENCY | 3 | ||
| PART 1 | |||
| ITEM 1. | IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS | 3 | |
| ITEM 2. | OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE | 3 | |
| ITEM 3. | KEY INFORMATION | 3 | |
| A. [Reserved] | 3 | ||
| B. Capitalization and Indebtedness | 3 | ||
| C. | Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds | ||
| D. Risk Factors | 3 | ||
| ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY | |||
| A. | History and Development of the Company | 15 | |
| B. Business Overview | 23 | ||
| C. Organizational Structure | |||
| D. Property, Plants and Equipment | 26 | ||
| ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | |||
| ITEM 5. | OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS | ||
| A. | Operating Results | ||
| B. Liquidity and Capital Resources. | 47 | ||
| C. | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. | ||
| D. Trend Information | 47 | ||
| ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES | 48 | ||
| A. Directors and Senior Management | 48 | ||
| B. Compensation | |||
| C. Board Practices | 56 | ||
| D. Employees | |||
| E. Share Ownership | 59 | ||
| ITEM 7. | MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | ||
| A. | Major Shareholders | ||
| B. Related Party Transactions | 62 | ||
| C. Interests of Experts and Counsel | |||
| ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 63 | ||
| A. | Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information | ||
| B. Significant Changes | 63 | ||
| ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING | |||
| A. Offer and Listing Details | |||
| B. Plan of Distribution | 66 | ||
| C. Markets | 66 | ||
-iii-
TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents
(continued)
| Page | |||
| D. Selling Shareholder | |||
| E. Dilution | |||
| F. Expenses of the Issue | 66 | ||
| ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | |||
| A. Share Capital | 66 | ||
| B. Memorandum and Articles of Association | |||
| C. Material Contracts | 69 | ||
| D. Exchange Controls | |||
| E. | |||
| Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations | |||
| F. Dividends and Paying Agents | 79 | ||
| G. Statement By Experts | |||
| H. Documents on Display | 79 | ||
| I. Subsidiary Information | |||
| ITEM 11. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. | ||
| ITEM 12. | DESCRIPTIONS OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES | ||
| PART II | |||
| ITEM 13. | DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES. | ||
| ITEM 14. | MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS. | ||
| 14.A.-D. | Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders | ||
| 14.E. Use of Proceeds | 80 | ||
| ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. | |||
| ITEM 16.A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT | 82 | ||
| ITEM | |||
| ITEM | |||
| ITEM 16.D. | EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES | ||
| ITEM 16.E. | PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS | ||
| ITEM 16.F. | CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT | ||
| ITEM 16.G. | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ||
| ITEM 16.H. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE | ||
| ITEM | |||
| PART III | |||
| ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 84 | ||
| ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 84 | ||
| ITEM 19. EXHIBITS | |||
-iv-
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 20-F and the documents incorporated by reference herein contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Actof 1995 and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian provincial securities laws (such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information are referred to herein as "forward-looking statements"). Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. All statements, other than statements which are reporting results as well as statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that Loncor ResourcesGold Inc. (the "Company" or "Loncor") believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future (including, without limitation, statements regarding drill results at the Adumbi deposit, mineral resource estimates, mineral resource increases, drill targets, future drilling, drilling and other exploration results, potential gold discoveries, potential mineralization, potential mineral resources, and the Company's exploration and development plans and objectives with respect to its projects) are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based on information currently available to the Company. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual events or results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements, and even if such actual events or results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, the Company. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things: the possibility that future exploration (including drilling) or development results will not be consistent with the Company's expectations; the possibility that drilling programs will be delayed,uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing in the future; activities of the Company may be adversely impacted by the continued spread of "COVID-19" (as defined below), including the ability of the Company to secure additional financing; risks related to the exploration stage of the Company's properties; the possibility that future exploration results will not be consistent with the Company's expectations; failure to establish estimated mineral resources or mineral reserves;resources; fluctuations in gold prices and currency exchange rates; inflation; rules adopted by the U.S.United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") that may affect mining operations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; gold recoveries being less than those indicated by the metallurgical testwork carried out to date (there can be no assurance that gold recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in large tests under on-site conditions or during production); changes in equity markets; political developments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; lack of infrastructure; failure to procure or maintain, or delays in procuring or maintaining, permits and approvals; lack of availability at a reasonable cost or at all, of plants, equipment or labour; inability to attract and retain key management and personnel; changes to regulations or policies affecting the Company's activities; the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological data; the Company's history of losses and expectation of future losses; the Company's ability to acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights; risks related to the integration of any new acquisitions into the Company's existing operations; increased competition in the mining industry; and the other risks disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" in this Form 20-F.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.
The mineral resource figures referred to in this Form 20-F are estimates and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of gold will be produced. Such estimates are expressions of judgment based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. While the Company believes that the resource estimates included in this Form 20-F are well established, by their nature, resource estimates are imprecise and depend, to a certain extent, upon statistical inferences which may ultimately prove unreliable. If such estimates are inaccurate or are reduced in the future, this could have a material adverse impact on the Company.
1
Due to the uncertainty that may be attached to inferred mineral resources, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will be upgraded to an indicated or measured mineral resource as a result of continued exploration. Confidence in the estimate is insufficient to allow meaningful application of the technical and economic parameters to enable an evaluation of economic viability sufficient for public disclosure, except in certain limited circumstances. Inferred mineral resources are excluded from estimates forming the basis of a feasibility study.
Statements concerning actual mineral resource estimates are also deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the relevant project or property is developed. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that mineral resources can be upgraded to mineral reserves through continued exploration.
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. INVESTORSINFORMATION REGARDING RESOURCE ESTIMATESMINERAL INFORMATION
Resource estimates
On October 31, 2018, the SEC adopted Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (“Regulation S-K 1300”) along with the amendments to related rules and guidance in this Form 20-F, includingorder to modernize the documents incorporated by reference herein,property disclosure requirements for mining registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act. Registrants engaged in mining operations must comply with Regulation S-K 1300 for the first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021. Accordingly, the Company is providing disclosure in compliance with Regulation S-K 1300 for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, and all of its mineral resources have been prepareddetermined in accordance with the requirements of securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Without limiting the foregoing, this Form 20-F, including the documents incorporated by reference herein, uses the terms "indicated" and "inferred" resources. U.S. investors are advised that, while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities laws, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") does not recognize them. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of indicated resources will ever be converted into reserves. Further, "inferred resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the "inferred resources" will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, U.S. investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the inferred resources exist, or that they can be mined legally or economically. Disclosure of "contained ounces" is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations, however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineral deposits that do not constitute "reserves" as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources contained in this Form 20-F or in the documents incorporated by reference, may not be comparable to information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC.
National Instrument 43-101 -Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects("NI 43-101") is a rule of the Canadian Securities Administrators which establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. Unless otherwise indicated, all resource estimates contained in or incorporated by reference in this Form 20-F have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Classification System. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC, and resource information contained herein and incorporated by reference herein may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies.Regulation S-K 1300.
CURRENCY
Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, all references in this Form 20-F to "US$" are to United States dollars and all references in this Form 20-F to "Cdn$" are to Canadian dollars.
2
PART 1
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "U.S. Exchange Act") and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
The selected consolidated financial information set forth below for each of the five years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, which is expressed in United States dollars (the Company prepares its financial statements in United States dollars), has been derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the financial years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, which differ in certain respects from the principles the Company would have followed had its consolidated financial statements been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the discussion in Item 5 of this Form 20-F and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto filed as part of this Form 20-F under Item 18. Historical results from any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.
| (in $000 except share data) | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||
| Net income (loss) from operations | (2,417 | ) | (2,903 | ) | (28,038 | ) | (2,027 | ) | 726 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) for the year | (2,417 | ) | (2,903 | ) | (27,224 | ) | (2,028 | ) | 533 | ||||||
| Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share | (0.03 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.37 | ) | (0.03 | ) | 0.01 | ||||||
| Current assets | 131 | 168 | 844 | 11,270 | 14,931 | ||||||||||
| Exploration and evaluation assets | 27,836 | 29,591 | 30,893 | 48,255 | 30,090 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | 28,049 | 29,951 | 32,182 | 60,274 | 45,800 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 1,758 | 1,769 | 1,203 | 2,488 | 2,464 | ||||||||||
| Net assets | 26,292 | 28,183 | 30,979 | 57,786 | 43,336 | ||||||||||
| Share capital | 76,241 | 75,715 | 75,715 | 75,715 | 60,045 | ||||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | 26,292 | 28,183 | 30,979 | 57,786 | 43,336 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 82,573 | 73,440 | 73,440 | 62,396 | 57,056 | ||||||||||
3
Exchange Rates3. Key Information
On March 21, 2016, the buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in Canadian dollars, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was US$1.00 = Cdn$1.3067. The following table sets forth, for each of the years or, as applicable, months indicated, additional information with respect to the noon buying rate for US$1.00 in Canadian dollars and are based upon the rates quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.A. [Reserved]
| Rate | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Average(1) | 1.2906 | 1.1083 | 1.03467 | 0.9996 | 0.9858 |
_________________________(1) The average rate means the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the year.
| October | November | December | January | February | March | |||||||||||||
| Rate | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016(1) | ||||||||||||
| High | 1.3242 | 1.336 | 1.3989 | 1.4592 | 1.4039 | 1.3466 | ||||||||||||
| Low | 1.2901 | 1.3093 | 1.3357 | 1.397 | 1.3546 | 1.2980 |
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness |
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
C. Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
D. Risk Factors |
There are a number of risks that may have a material and adverse impact on the future operating and financial performance of Loncor and could cause the Company's operating and financial performance to differ materially from the estimates described in forward-looking statements relating to the Company. These include widespread risks associated with any form of business and specific risks associated with Loncor's business and its involvement in the gold exploration industry.
An investment in the Company's common shares is considered speculative and involves a high degree of risk due to, among other things, the nature of Loncor's business (which is the exploration of mineral properties), the present stage of its development and the location of Loncor's projects in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the "DRC"). In addition to the other information presented in this Form 20-F, a prospective investor should carefully consider the risk factors set out below and the other information that Loncor files with the SEC and with Canadian securities regulators before investing in the Company's common shares. The Company has identified the following non-exhaustive list of inherent risks and uncertainties that it considers to be relevant to its operations and business plans. Such risk factors could materially affect the Company's future operating results and could cause actual events to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements relating to the Company. As well, additional risks that the Company is unaware of or that are currently believed to be immaterial may become important factors that affect the Company's business.
43
The Company's business could be adversely impacted by the outbreak of contagious diseases, including the effect of the spread of coronavirus.
The Company is susceptible to risks related to the outbreak of contagious diseases, including the ongoing widespread outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a novel strain of the coronavirus ("COVID-19"). The Company's business could be adversely impacted by the effects of COVID-19 (as well as any other outbreak of contagious diseases). During 2019, COVID-19 emerged in China and has since spread worldwide. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company's business, including its operations and the market for its securities, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time, and include the duration, severity and scope of the outbreak and the actions taken to contain or treat the COVID-19 outbreak (including the travel and quarantine restrictions currently being imposed by governments of affected countries). In particular, the continued spread of COVID-19 globally could materially and adversely impact the Company's business including without limitation, employee health, workforce productivity, limitations on travel, the availability of industry experts and personnel, restrictions to the exploration and development of its mineral properties, including restrictions on drill programs and/or the timing to process drill and other metallurgical testing, and other factors that will depend on future developments beyond the Company's control, all of which may have a material and adverse effect on the its business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the personnel of the Company and its partners and service providers will not be impacted by COVID-19 and ultimately see workforce productivity reduced or incur increased costs, including but limited to medical and insurance premiums. In addition, COVID-19 has resulted in a widespread global health crisis that has significantly adversely affected global economies and capital markets, resulting in an economic downturn that could become much worse and have an adverse effect on the Company's future prospects, including its ability to secure financing from capital markets and further explore and develop its mineral properties.
The Company has not generated revenues from operations and is wholly reliant upon external financing, does not have a history of miningoperations, and there is no assurance that it will produce revenue, operate profitably or provide areturn on investment in the future.
The Company has not generated revenues from operations and there is no assurance that it will produce revenue, operate profitably or provide a return on investment in the future. The Company has only incurred operating losses, and the development of its projects is at an early stage. The Company produced a loss of US$2,417,2473,723,784 for the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, and, as of that date, the Company’sCompany's deficit was US$58,091,49366,933,241 and the Company had a working capital deficit of US$1,626,7881,178,733 which casts substantial doubt on the Company’sCompany's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is subject to the risks and challenges experienced by other companies at a comparable stage. These risks include, but are not limited to, continuing losses and the ability to secure adequate financing or to complete corporate transactions to meet the minimum capital required to successfully complete its projects and fund other operating expenses.
The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. DevelopmentAs well, further exploration and development of the Company’sCompany's current projects to the production stage will require significant additional financing. Given the current economic climate and state of capital markets, including the effects of the public health crisis resulting from COVID-19, the ability to raise funds may prove difficult. The Company has no revenues and is wholly reliant upon external financing to fund such plans.its activities. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available to the Company or, if it is, that it will be offered on acceptable terms. If additional financing is raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities of the Company, the interests of the Company's shareholders in the net assets of the Company may be diluted. Any failure of the Company to obtain required financing on acceptable terms could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and its ability to continue as a going concern, and may require the Company to cancel or postpone planned capital investments.exploration or development activities on its mineral properties.
4
"We draw attention to Note 2 in the consolidated financial statements, which describe the events and conditions that indicate the existence of material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter."
The assets and operations of Loncor are subject to political, economic and other uncertainties as aresult of being located in the DRC.
Loncor's projects are located in the DRC. The assets and operations of the Company are therefore subject to various political, economic and other uncertainties, including, among other things, the risks of war and civil unrest, hostage taking, expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing licenses, permits, approvals and contracts, taxation policies, foreign exchange and repatriation restrictions, changing political conditions, international monetary fluctuations, currency controls and foreign governmental regulations that favour or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political climate in the DRC may adversely affect Loncor's operations or profitability. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income taxes, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral rights, could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements. In addition, in the event of a dispute arising from operations in the DRC, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in Canada. The Company also may be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a governmental instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. It is not possible for the Company to accurately predict such developments or changes in laws or policy or to what extent any such developments or changes may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations. Should the Company's rights or its titles not be honoured or become unenforceable for any reason, or if any material term of these agreements is arbitrarily changed by the government of the DRC, the Company's business, financial condition and prospects will be materially adversely affected.
5
Some or all of the Company's properties are located in regions where political instability and violence is ongoing (for example, in November 2012, the M23 rebel group took over the city of Goma (Loncor's operations are located about 420 kilometres northwest of Goma and were unaffected by the M23 situation), but subsequently withdrew from Goma under international pressure).ongoing. Some or all of the Company's properties are inhabited by artisanal miners. These conditions may interfere with work on the Company's properties and present a potential security threat to the Company's employees. There is a risk that activities at the Company’sCompany's properties may be delayed or interfered with, due to the conditions of political instability, violence, hostage taking or the inhabitation of the properties by artisanal miners. The Company uses its best efforts to maintain good relations with the local communities in order to minimize such risks.
The DRC is a developing nation emerging from a period of civil war and conflict. Physical and institutional infrastructure throughout the DRC is in a debilitated condition. The DRC is in transition from a largely state controlled economy to one based on free market principles, and from a non-democratic political system with a centralized ethnic power base, to one based on more democratic principles. There can be no assurance that these changes will be effected or that the achievement of these objectives will not have material adverse consequences for Loncor and its operations. The DRC continues to experience instability in parts of the country due to certain militia and criminal elements. While the government and United Nations forces are working to support the extension of central government authority throughout the country, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful.
5
HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases represent a serious threat to maintaining a skilled workforce in the mining industry in the DRC. HIV/AIDS is a major healthcare challenge faced by the Company's operations in the country. There can be no assurance that the Company will not lose members of its workforce or workforce man-hours or incur increased medical costs, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations.
The DRC has historically experienced relatively high rates of inflation.
6
The Company’sCompany's properties are in the exploration stage, and there can be no assurance that theCompany’s Company's exploration activities will result in discoveries that are commercially viable.
The Company's properties are in the exploration stage. The future development of properties found to be economically feasible will require board approval, the construction and operation of mines, processing plants and related infrastructure. As a result, Loncor is subject to all of the risks associated with establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including: the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of the construction of mining and processing facilities; the availability and costs of skilled labour and mining equipment; the availability and costs of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements; the need to obtain necessary environmental and other governmental approvals and permits, and the timing of those approvals and permits; and, the availability of funds to finance construction and development activities. The costs, timing and complexities of mine construction and development are increased by the remote location of the Company's properties. It is common in new mining operations to experience unexpected problems and delays during construction, development, and mine start-up. In addition, delays in the commencement of mineral production often occur. Accordingly, there are no assurances that the Company's activities will result in profitable mining operations or that the Company will successfully establish mining operations or profitably produce gold at any of its properties.
The Company may be adversely affected by fluctuations in gold prices.
The future price of gold will significantly affect the development of Loncor's projects. Gold prices are subject to significant fluctuation and are affected by a number of factors which are beyond Loncor's control. Such factors include, but are not limited to, interest rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional supply and demand, and the political and economic conditions of major gold-producing countries throughout the world. The price of gold has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future price declines could cause development of and commercial production from Loncor's mineral interests to be impracticable. The current global health crisis caused by COVID-19 has significantly adversely affected global economies and capital markets, resulting in significant fluctuations in the gold price. If the price of gold decreases, projected cash flow from planned mining operations may not be sufficient to justify ongoing operations and Loncor could be forced to discontinue development and sell its projects. Future production from Loncor's projects is dependent on gold prices that are adequate to make these projects economic.
6
The Company has substantially reduced exploration efforts at its projects, and there is no assurancethat they will be recommenced.
As a result of the sharp decline in gold prices over the past few years and the difficult financing prospects for gold exploration companies in general and the Company in particular, the Company has substantially reduced exploration efforts at its projects in order to conserve cash. It is unlikely that the reduced exploration efforts can identify additional resources or make other substantial progress in advancing the projects. There can be no assurance that exploration will be significantly increased at the projects in the foreseeable future. Failure to conduct significant exploration activities would result in the inability to identify further development potential of the projects and could render financing more difficult to obtain, which would materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition.
The Company’sCompany's activities are subject to various laws and government approvals and no assurancecan be given that the Company will be successful in obtaining or maintaining such approvals orthat it will successfully comply with all applicable laws.
Loncor's mineral exploration activities are subject to various laws governing prospecting, mining, development, production, taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances, land use, water use, land claims of local people and other matters. Although Loncor's exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner which could limit or curtail development.
7
Many of Loncor's mineral rights and interests are subject to government approvals, licenses and permits. Such approvals, licenses and permits are, as a practical matter, subject to the discretion of the DRC government. No assurance can be given that Loncor will be successful in maintaining any or all of the various approvals, licenses and permits in full force and effect without modification or revocation. To the extent such approvals are not maintained, Loncor may be delayed, curtailed or prohibited from continuing or proceeding with planned exploration of mineral properties.
Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be delayed or curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in the exploration or development of mineral properties may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.
Amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on Loncor and cause increases in exploration expenses, capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in development of mineral interests.
Exploration, development and mining involve a high degree of risk.
All of the Company's properties are in the exploration stage only. The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks that even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenditures may be required to locate and establish mineral reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. Whether a mineral deposit, once discovered, will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, some of which are: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; metal prices which are highly cyclical; and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in Loncor not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.
There is no certainty that expenditures made by Loncor towards the search for and evaluation of mineral deposits will result in discoveries that are commercially viable. In addition, assuming discovery of a commercial ore-body, depending on the type of mining operation involved, several years can elapse from the initial phase of drilling until commercial operations are commenced.
7
Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. Such operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration for, and development and production of gold and other precious or base metals, including unusual and unexpected geologic formations, seismic activity, rock bursts, fires, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material as well as industrial accidents, labour force disruptions, fall of ground accidents in underground operations, unanticipated increases in gold lock-up and inventory levels at heap-leach operations and force majeure factors, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, mines and other producing facilities, damage to person or property, environmental damage, delays, increased production costs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Milling operations are subject to hazards such as equipment failure or failure of mining pit slopes and retaining dams around tailings disposal areas, which may result in environmental pollution and consequent liability. The Company may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, is not generally available to the Company or to other companies within the mining industry. The Company may suffer a material adverse effect on its business if it incurs losses related to any significant events that are not covered by insurance policies.
8
There can be no assurance that an active market for the Company’sCompany's securities will be sustained.
The market price of the Company's securities may fluctuate significantly based on a number of factors, some of which are unrelated to the financial performance or prospects of the Company. These factors include macroeconomic developments in North America and globally, market perceptions of the attractiveness of particular industries, short-term changes in commodity prices, other precious metal prices, the attractiveness of alternative investments, currency exchange fluctuation, the political environment in the DRC and the Company's financial condition or results of operations as reflected in its consolidated financial statements. These factors also currently include the impact of COVID-19, which has resulted in a widespread global health crisis that has significantly adversely affected global economies and capital markets, resulting in extreme volatility in capital markets. Other factors unrelated to the performance of the Company that may have an effect on the price of the securities of the Company include the following: the extent of analytical coverage available to investors concerning the business of the Company may be limited if investment banks with research capabilities do not follow the Company's securities; lessening in trading volume and general market interest in the Company's securities may affect an investor's ability to trade significant numbers of securities of the Company; the size of the Company's public float may limit the ability of some institutions to invest in the Company's securities; the Company's operating performance and the performance of competitors and other similar companies; the public's reaction to the Company's press releases, other public announcements and the Company's filings with the various securities regulatory authorities; changes in estimates or recommendations by research analysts who track the Company's securities or the shares of other companies in the resource sector; the arrival or departure of key personnel; acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures involving the Company or its competitors; the factors listed in this Form 20-F under the heading "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements"; and a substantial decline in the price of the securities of the Company that persists for a significant period of time could cause the Company's securities to be delisted from any exchange on which they are listed at that time, further reducing market liquidity. If there is no active market for the securities of the Company, the liquidity of an investor's investment may be limited and the price of the securities of the Company may decline. If such a market does not develop, investors may lose their entire investment in the Company's securities.
8
The Company expects that it will be considered a passive foreign investment company or "PFIC".
Holders of common sharesofsharesof the Company that are U.S. taxpayers should be aware that, due to the nature of the Company's assets and the income that it expects to generate, the Company expects to be a "passive foreign investment company" ("PFIC") for the current year, and may be a PFIC in subsequent taxable years. Whether the Company will be a PFIC for the current tax year or any future tax yearsyear will depend on the Company's assets and income over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Form 20-F. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status for any tax year. U.S. federal income tax laws contain rules which result in materially adverse tax consequences to U.S. taxpayers that own shares of a corporation which has been classified as a PFIC during any taxable year of such holder's holding period. A U.S. taxpayer who holds stock in a foreign corporation during any year in which such corporation qualifies as a PFIC may mitigate such negative tax consequences by making certain U.S. federal income tax elections, which are subject to numerous restrictions and limitations. Holders of the Company's common shares are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Company's common shares. This paragraph is only a brief summary of the PFIC rules, and is qualified in its entirety by the section below entitled "Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations".
9
The Company has a history of losses and may never achieve revenues or profitability.
The Company has incurred losses from operations since it became a mineral exploration company in November 2008its inception and the Company expects to incur losses from operations for the foreseeable future. The Company had an accumulated deficit of US$58,091,49366,933,241 as of December 31, 2015.2021. The losses do not include capitalized mineral property exploration costs. The Company expects to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as one or more of its properties enter into commercial production and generate sufficient revenues to fund continuing operations. The development of the Company's properties will require the commitment of substantial financial resources. The amount and timing of expenditures will depend on a number of factors, including the progress of ongoing exploration and development, the results of consultants' analysis and recommendations, the rate at which operating losses are incurred, and the Company's acquisition of additional properties, some of which are beyond the Company's control. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever achieve profitability.
In order to develop any of its projects the Company will need to establish the facilities and materialnecessary to support operations in the remote locations in which they are situated, which lack basic infrastructure.infrastructure.
The Company's projects are located in remote areas of the DRC, which lack basic infrastructure, including sources of power, water, housing, food and transport. In order to develop any of its projects Loncor will need to establish the facilities and material necessary to support operations in the remote locations in which they are situated. The remoteness of each project will affect the potential viability of mining operations, as Loncor will also need to establish substantially greater sources of power, water, physical plant and transport infrastructure than are currently present in the area. The transportation of equipment and supplies into the DRC and the transportation of resources out of the DRC may also be subject to delays that adversely affect the ability of the Company to proceed with its mineral projects in the country in a timely manner. Shortages of the supply of diesel, mechanical parts and other items required for the Company's operations could have an adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. The lack of availability of such sources may adversely affect mining feasibility and will, in any event, require Loncor to arrange significant financing, locate adequate supplies and obtain necessary approvals from national, provincial and regional governments, none of which can be assured. The Company's interests in the DRC are accessed over lands that may also be subject to the interests of third parties which may result in further delays and disputes in the carrying out of the Company's operational activities.
9
There is uncertainty in the estimation of mineral resources.
The mineral resource figures referred to in this Form 20-F and in the Company's filings with the SEC and applicable Canadian securities regulatory authorities, press releases and other public statements that may be made from time to time are estimates. These estimates are imprecise and depend upon geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which may prove to be unreliable. There can be no assurance that these estimates will be accurate or that this mineralization could be mined or processed profitably.
The Company has not commenced commercial production on any of its properties, and has not defined or delineated any proven or probable reserves on any of its properties. Mineralization estimates for the Company's properties may require adjustments or downward revisions based upon further exploration or development work or actual production experience. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by drilling results. There can be no assurance that minerals recovered in small scale tests will be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.
10
The resource estimates referred to in this Form 20-F have been determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in the market price for gold may render portions of the Company's mineralization uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralization. Any material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of the Company's ability to extract this mineralization, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
The Company has not established the presence of any proven or probable reserves at any of its properties. There can be no assurance that subsequent testing or future studies will establish proven and probable reserves on such properties. The failure to establish proven and probable reserves on such properties could severely restrict the Company's ability to successfully implement its strategies for long-term growth.
There is uncertainty relating to inferred mineral resources.
There is a risk that the inferred mineral resources referred to in this Form 20-F cannot be converted into mineral reserves as the ability to assess geological continuity is not sufficient to demonstrate economic viability. Due to the uncertainty that may attach to inferred mineral resources, there is no assurance that inferred mineral resources will be upgraded to resources with sufficient geological continuity to constitute proven and probable mineral reserves as a result of continued exploration.
The Company is exposed to a heightened degree of risk due to the lack of property diversification.
The Company's focus is the Ngayu and North Kivu projects account for all ofGreenstone Belt in the DRC, in particular the Company's mineral properties.Adumbi deposit at its Imbo Project. Any adverse development affecting the progress of either of these projectsits Ngayu properties, in particular the Company's Adumbi deposit, may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance and results of operations.
10
Negative market perception of junior mineral exploration companies could adversely affect the Company.Company.
Market perception of junior mineral exploration companies such as the Company may shift such that these companies are viewed less favourably. This factor could impact the value of investors' holdings and the ability of the Company to raise further funds, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and prospects.
The SEC has adopted rules that may affect mining operations in the DRC.
The Company’sCompany's business is subject to evolving corporate governance and public disclosure regulations that have increased both the Company’sCompany's compliance costs and the risk of noncompliance, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’sCompany's stock price.
The Company is subject to changing rules and regulations promulgated by a number of United States and Canadian governmental and self-regulated organizations, including the SEC, the Canadian Securities Administrators, the Toronto Stock Exchange, and the International Accounting Standards Board. These rules and regulations continue to evolve in scope and complexity and many new requirements have been created in response to laws enacted by the United States Congress, making compliance more difficult and uncertain. For example, on July 21, 2010, the United States Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which is expectedpursuant to result inwhich the SEC adopting rules that will require the Company to disclose on an annual basis certain payments made by the Company, its subsidiaries or entities controlled by it, to the U.S. government and foreign governments, including sub-national governments. The SEC has also adopted rules under the Dodd Frank Act thatwhich require a company filing reports with the SEC to disclose on an annual basis whether certain “conflict minerals”"conflict minerals" necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by such company originated in the DRC or any adjoining country. The Company currently holds properties located in the DRC. It is possible that the new SEC rules regarding conflict minerals could adversely affect the value of the minerals mined in the DRC, which may impact the value of the Company’sCompany's interests in those properties. The Company’sCompany's efforts to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and other new rules and regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administration expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from potential revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.
11
The Company is not insured to cover potential risks.
The Company currently does not have insurance to cover potential risks associated with its operations, including industrial accidents, damages to equipment and facilities, labour disputes, pollution, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, rock bursts, ground or slope failures, cave-ins, fires, changes in the regulatory environment and natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods, earthquakes and other environmental occurrences. Losses from these events may cause Loncor to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its financial performance and results of operations.
The Company’sCompany's operations may be adversely affected by environmental hazards on the propertiesand related environmental regulations.
All phases of Loncor's operations are subject to environmental regulation. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays on behalf of the Company and may cause material changes or delays in the Company's intended activities. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect Loncor's operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which Loncor holds interests which are unknown to Loncor at present and which have been caused by previous owners or operators of the properties. Reclamation costs are uncertain and planned expenditures may differ from the actual expenditures required.
11
The Company is a foreigncorporation and all of the Company’sCompany's directors and officers except onedirector are outside the United States, which makes enforcement of civil liabilities difficult.
The Company is organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario in Canada, and its principal executive office is located in Toronto, Canada. All of the Company's directors and officers except one director and all of the experts referred to in this Form 20-F, reside outside of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of their assets, and all or a substantial portion of the Company's assets, are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors in the United States or otherwise outside of Canada to bring an action against directors, officers or experts who are not resident in the United States or in other jurisdictions outside Canada. It may also be difficult for an investor to enforce a judgment obtained in a United States court or a court of another jurisdiction of residence predicated upon the civil liability provisions of federal securities laws or other laws of the United States or any state thereof or the equivalent laws of other jurisdictions outside Canada against those persons or the Company.
12
The Company’sCompany's business depends on its ability to identify and acquire commercially mineablemineral rights, and there can be no assurances that it will be successful in such efforts.
Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore deposits and no assurance can be given that any anticipated level of recovery of ore reserves will be realized or that any identified mineral deposit will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) ore body which can be legally and economically exploited. Estimates of reserves, resources, mineral deposits and production costs can also be affected by such factors as environmental permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Material changes in ore reserves, grades, stripping ratios or recovery rates may affect the economic viability of any project.
Loncor's future growth and productivity will depend, in part, on its ability to identify and acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights, and on the costs and results of continued exploration and development programs. Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and is frequently non-productive. Substantial expenditures are required to: establish ore reserves through drilling and metallurgical and other testing techniques; determine metal content and metallurgical recovery processes to extract metal from the ore; and construct, renovate or expand mining and processing facilities.
In addition, if the Company discovers ore, it would take several years from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of production may change. As a result of these uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the Company will successfully acquire additional commercially mineable (or viable) mineral rights.
Litigation may adversely affect the Company’sCompany's financial position, results of operations or theCompany’s Company's project development operations.
The Company may from time to time be involved in various legal proceedings. While the Company believes it is unlikely that the final outcome of any such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operation, defence and settlement costs can be substantial, even with respect to claims that have no merit. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the litigation process, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular legal matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's future cash flow, results of operations or financial condition.
12
Future hedging activities may result in selling products at a price lower than could have otherwisebeen received.
The Company has not entered into forward contracts or other derivative instruments to sell gold that it might produce in the future. Although the Company has no near term plans to enter such transactions, it may do so in the future if required for project financing. Forward contracts obligate the holder to sell hedged production at a price set when the holder enters into the contract, regardless of what the price is when the product is actually mined. Accordingly, there is a risk that the price of the product is higher at the time it is mined than when the Company entered into the contracts, so that the product must be sold at a price lower than could have been received if the contract was not entered. There is also the risk that the Company may have insufficient gold production to deliver into forward sales positions. The Company may enter into option contracts for gold to mitigate the effects of such hedging.
13
Increased sales of the Company’sCompany's common shares by shareholders could lower the marketplacetrading price ofthe shares.
Sales of a large number of the Company's common shares in the public markets, or the potential for such sales, could decrease the trading price of such shares and could impair Loncor's ability to raise capital through future sales of common shares.
Fluctuations in currency could have a material impact on the Company’sCompany's financial statements.
The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional currency. Fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies (including the Canadian dollar) could have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements by creating gains or losses. No currency hedge policies are in place or are presently contemplated.
The loss of key management personnel or the inability to recruit additional qualified personnel mayadversely affect the Company’sCompany's business.
The success of the Company depends on the good faith, experience and judgment of the Company's management and advisors in supervising and providing for the effective management of the business and the operations of the Company. The Company is dependent on a small number of key personnel, the loss of any one of whom could have an adverse effect on the Company. The Company currently does not have key person insurance on these individuals. The Company may need to recruit additional qualified personnel to supplement existing management and there is no assurance that the Company will be able to attract such personnel.
The Company may not be able to compete with current and potential exploration companies, someof whom have greater resources and technical facilities.
The natural resource industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases. Significant competition exists for the acquisition of properties producing, or capable of producing, gold or other metals. The Company competes with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities than itself. The Company may also encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in its efforts to hire experienced mining professionals. As well, there is competition for exploration resources at all levels, particularly affecting the availability of manpower, drill rigs and helicopters. Increased competition could also adversely affect the Company's ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.
13
Certain directors and officers may be in a position of conflict of interest with respect to theCompany due to their relationship with other resource companies.
A number of directorsDirectors and officers of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in the exploration and development of natural resource properties. As a result, conflicts may arise between the obligations of these individuals to the Company and to such other companies.
14
The Company has never paid and has no plans to pay dividends.
The Company has not paid out any cash dividends to date and has no plans to do so in the immediate future. As a result, an investor’sinvestor's return on investment in the Company’sCompany's common shares will be solely determined by his or her ability to sell such shares in the secondary market.
Trading of the Company’sCompany's common shares in the United States may be effected by its voluntarydelisting from the NYSE MKT.American.
The Company’sCompany's common shares are traded exclusively in the United States on the OTC PinkOTCQX tier of the OTC Link.Markets. The Company’sCompany's common shares previously traded on the NYSE MKT,American, and the OTC PinkOTCQX does not require the same level of disclosure and compliance requirements compared to the NYSE MKT.American. The Company is still, however, required to meet its SEC filing requirements and to meet its Toronto Stock Exchange and Canadian filing, compliance and disclosure requirements. As the Company’sCompany's common shares are no longer listed on the NYSE MKT,American, shareholders will not be able to trade its common shares on the NYSE MKTAmerican and certain federal and state securities law exemptions for its common shares would no longer be available. Consequently, the trading market for the Company’sCompany's securities in the United States will be limited.
The Toronto Stock Exchange has placedvalue of the Company under remedial delisting reviewCompany's common shares, as well as its ability to raise equity capital, may be impacted by future issuances of shares.
The Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") has placed the Company is authorized under remedial delisting review as the Company did not meet the TSX’s requirements with respectits articles to the Company’s working capital position and market capitalization.issue an unlimited number of common shares. The Company has requestedmay issue more common shares in the future. Sales of substantial amounts of common shares (including shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options or warrants), or the perception that it be provided additional time to regain compliance with the continued listing requirements of the TSX. There is no guarantee that the Company will regain compliance with the continued listing requirements of the TSX. If the TSX determines to delistsuch sales could occur, could materially adversely affect prevailing market prices for the common shares and the ability of the Company to raise equity capital in the future.
The Company is subject to climate change risks which may impact the Company's operations
Legislative and regulatory measures to address climate change and greenhouse gas emissions are in various phases of consideration. If adopted, such measures could increase the Company's cost of environmental compliance and also delay or otherwise negatively affect efforts to obtain permits and other regulatory approvals. Proposed measures could also result in increased cost of fuel and other consumables used at the Company's operations. Adoption of these or similar new environmental regulations or more stringent application of existing regulations may materially increase the Company's costs, threaten certain operating activities and constrain its opportunities.
14
Forward-looking statements may prove to be inaccurate.
Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties, of both general and specific nature, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements or contribute to the possibility that predictions, forecasts or projections will seek a listingprove to be materially inaccurate. Additional information on such risks, assumptions and uncertainties can be found in this Form 20-F under the heading "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements".
Item 4. Information on the TSX Venture Exchange. However, there is no guarantee that a TSX Venture Exchange listing application would be accepted.Company
A. History and Development of the Company |
The Company is a corporation which was formed under the Ontario Business Corporations Act on August 24, 1993. A summary of the Company's legal names since its formation is provided in Item 14 of this annual report on Form 20-F. The head office and registered office of the Company is located at 1 First Canadian Place, Suite 7070, 100 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada. The telephone number of such office is (416) 366-2221.361-2510.
On November 28, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition (the "Acquisition") of all of the outstanding shares of the private company, Loncor Resources Inc. ("Old Loncor"). Also on November 28, 2008, immediately following this acquisition, the Company amalgamated with Old Loncor and, pursuant to the amalgamation, changed its name from Nevada Bob's International Inc. to Loncor Resources Inc. As a result of this acquisition, the business of the Company is the exploration of mineral properties in the DRC. Prior to this acquisition, the Company was in the business of licensing the right to use (a) the Nevada Bob's trademarks in connection with operating retail golf stores internationally, excluding the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada and the United States, and (b) certain other golf-related, non-Nevada Bob's trademarks internationally, including the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada and the United States.
15
In September 2009, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of 3,000,0001,500,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.751.50 per share for proceeds to the Company of Cdn$2,250,000.
In October 2009, the Company announced the appointment of Peter Cowley as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Cowley was also appointed to the board of directors of the Company. Kevin Baker stepped down as President and Chief Executive Officer, but remained a non-executive director of the Company until March 2014. Arnold Kondrat was appointed Executive Vice President of the Company and relinquished the title of Chairman of the Board of the Company. In connection with Mr. Cowley's appointment as a director of the Company, Geoffrey Farr stepped down as a director of the Company but remains Corporate Secretary of the Company.
In February 2010, the Company completed a brokered private placement financing involving the issuance of 8,166,5004,083,250 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$1.252.50 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$10,208,125. Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$1.452.90 for a period of 24 months. GMP Securities L.P. as lead agent, together with CI Capital Markets Inc. and Salman Partners Inc., acted as the Company's agents in connection with this financing.
Also in February 2010, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement financing involving the issuance to an affiliate ("Newmont") of Newmont Mining Corporation of 4,000,0002,000,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$1.252.50 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$5,000,000. The units issued under this financing had the same terms as the units issued under the February 2010 brokered private placement. In December 2010, Newmont exercised the 2,000,0001,000,000 warrants that it had acquired under the said February 2010 non-brokered private placement, resulting in the issuance by the Company to Newmont of 2,000,0001,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$1.452.90 per share for gross proceeds to the Company of Cdn$2,900,000.
15
The Company established the main Ngayu exploration camp in early 2010 at the Yindi prospect, located in the southwest corner of the Ngayu gold project area.
In June 2010, the Company announced initial assay results from the Makapela prospect at the Company's Ngayu gold project. A core drilling program at Makapela commenced in November 2010 with the objective of testing along strike and at depth the sub vertical, vein mineralized system being exploited by the artisanal miners at the Main, North and Sele Sele pits which returned significant results from channel sampling. Drill results at Makapela were announced by the Company via a number of press releases in 2011 and 2012.
Exploration at the Itali prospect at the Company's Ngayu gold project commenced during the third quarter of 2010. The Itali prospect is located about 10 kilometres south of Makapela. In January 2012, the Company announced the results of its first drill hole at the Itali prospect. Additional drill results at the Itali prospect were announced by the Company in October 2012.
In December 2010, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement with Newmont involving the issuance by the Company to Newmont of 2,000,0001,000,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$1.953.90 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$3,900,000. Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant of the Company. Each full warrant was exercisable into one additional common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.304.60 until December 2012 (these warrants expired in December 2012 without being exercised).
16
In February 2011, the Company and Newmont entered into a technology consultation services agreement pursuant to which Newmont agreed to make available to Loncor, at Loncor’sLoncor's reasonable request, exploration consultation services to assist Loncor in the exploration of Loncor's Ngayu gold project.
Also in February 2011, the Company completed concurrent brokered and non-brokered private placement equity financings. Pursuant to a “bought deal”"bought deal" private placement financing conducted by a syndicate of investment dealers, the Company issued 8,500,0004,250,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.354.70 per share, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$19,975,000. The Company also issued, by way of non-brokered private placement, to Newmont, 1,700,000850,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.354.70 per share for aggregate proceeds of Cdn$3,995,000.
In April 2011, the Company’sCompany's common shares commenced trading on the NYSE MKTAmerican LLC (formerly called NYSE Amex LLC). The Company retained its primary listing on the TSX Venture Exchange.
In December 2011, the Company announced the results of the regional assessment of its Ngayu gold project. The targets were outlined by assessing the results of two regional BLEG (Bulk Leach Extractable Gold) geochemical surveys conducted during 2011 as part of the technology consultation services agreement between Loncor and Newmont. In accordance with this agreement, Loncor iswas able to utilize advanced exploration assessment techniques developed by Newmont. As part of this evaluation program, the BLEG results were assessed in conjunction with a detailed geophysical magnetic interpretation of the Ngayu Greenstone belt also undertaken by senior Newmont geophysicists to define the target areas. The initial BLEG survey commenced in March 2011 and comprised the collection of 418 stream sediment samples, at an average sample density of one sample per 10 square kilometres. A second round of infill BLEG sampling was undertaken in September 2011 consisting of 185 samples at an average sample density of one sample per four square kilometres. Samples were sent to Newmont's proprietary geochemical laboratory in Perth, Australia for preparation and analysis. From these results, six high priority targets were delineated together with seven medium priority targets for follow up.
16
In January 2012, the Company announced initial bottle roll metallurgical testwork results for the Makapela prospect at the Company's Ngayu gold project. Bottle roll is a preliminary metallurgical test to determine how much and how easily gold may be liberated from an ore using cyanide.
In May 2012, the Companyannounced a maiden mineral resource estimate for the Company's Makapela prospect, of 4.10 million tonnes grading 7.59 g/t Au (using a 2.75 g/t Au cut-off) for an inferred mineral resource of 1.0 million ounces.ounces of gold. The Company also announced that this mineral resource was outlined down to a maximum vertical depth 500 metres below surface with gold mineralization open at depth.
In June 2012, the Company announced an exploration update on its regional target follow-up at its Ngayu gold project, reporting that initial groundwork on the priority regional targets has delineated significant mineralized gold trends at Nagasa (4.5 kilometres), Matete (2.0 kilometres) and Mondarabe (1.5 kilometres) in the Imva Fold area. The Company also reported that it hashad commenced a preliminary economic assessment of the Makapela prospect.
In October 2012, the Company completed two financings concurrently, raising total gross proceeds of Cdn$14,799,750. The first financing involved the issuance of 9,245,0004,622,500 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$1.052.10 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$9,707,250. This offering was conducted by a syndicate of investment dealers and was made by way of a short form prospectus filed with securities regulatory authorities in all of the provinces of Canada (other than Québec). The said shares were also offered on a private placement basis in certain jurisdictions outside of Canada. The second financing involved a non-brokered private placement to Newmont of 4,850,0002,425,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$1.052.10 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$5,092,500. As of the date of this Form 20-F, Newmont holds 14,550,0007,275,000 (representing 9.61%5.17%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company.
17
In April 2013, the Company announced updated mineral resource estimates for the Company's Makapela prospect, of an indicated mineral resource of 0.61 million ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading at 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 0.55 million ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading at 5.30 g/t Au).
In April 2013, the Company announced results of IP surveys at the Company's Nagasa prospect at the Ngayu project, which surveys identified three well-defined, open-ended anomalous zones. The Company had acquired IP equipment in January 2013 with the objectives of: (a) locating potentially mineralized zones in areas covered by transported overburden where soil geochemistry is problematic, such as at Nagasa, and (b) testing for “blind”"blind" ore bodies where mineralization does not reach surface.
The Company’sCompany's common shares began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange effective April 26, 2013 and were delisted from the TSX Venture Exchange at the same time.
In July 2013, the Company updated exploration activities at its Ngayu project including announcing drilling results. The Company also reported that, as a result of the sharp decrease in the gold price, the Company willwould be reducing its exploration effort and overhead costs until market conditions improve. The Company further reported that, in terms of the Makapela preliminary economic assessment, due to the sharply lower gold price, it was decided to not incur any further expenditure on the study until the gold market improves.
17
As a result of the sharp decline in gold prices in 2013 and the difficult financing prospects for gold exploration companies in general and the Company in particular, the Company substantially reduced exploration efforts at its projects in order to conserve cash. SinceFrom the end of September 2013 and tountil the date of this Form 20-F,joint venture agreement signed with Randgold in January 2016, the Company undertook mainly assessment of exploration work undertaken earlier in 2013 at Ngayu and selecting prospects at Ngayu requiring further investigation. In addition, new historical data has beenwas obtained and is being assessed for the North Kivu project in order to select target areas for follow up.
In April 2014, Loncor voluntarily delisted from the NYSE MKTAmerican LLC.
In February 2015, Peter Cowley stepped down from his roles as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for personal reasons. Mr. Cowley agreed to provide advisory services to Loncor. Arnold T. Kondrat ("Kondrat"), Founder and a director of the Company and who at the time was Executive Vice President and a founding director of the Company, was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
In February 2015, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 8,000,0004,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.060.12 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$480,000. In March 2015, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 3,000,000750,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.060.24 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$180,000.
In January 2016, Loncor’sLoncor's subsidiary, Loncor Resources Congo SARL ("Loncor Subco"), entered into a joint venture agreement (the "Agreement") with Randgold Resources (DRC) Limited ("Randgold"). The Agreement providesprovided for a joint venture (the "Loncor CongoJoint Venture") between Loncor Subco and Randgold covering all of the exploration permit areas comprising Loncor’sat the time of the Agreement Loncor's Ngayu project, other than certain parcels of land surrounding and including the Makapela and Yindi prospects which arewere retained by Loncor Subco and dodid not form part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture. Randgold will havehad certain preemptive rights over these two areas. Under the Agreement, Randgold will managemanaged and fundfunded all exploration of the said permit areas until the completion of a prefeasibility study on any gold discovery meeting the investment criteria of Randgold. Once the Loncor Congo Joint Venture hashad determined to move ahead with a full feasibility study, a special purpose vehicle ("SPV") would be created to hold the specific discovery areas. Subject to the DRC’sDRC's free carried interest requirements, Randgold would retain 65% of the SPV with Loncor Subco holding the balance of 35%. Loncor Subco willwould be required, from that point forward, to fund its pro-rata share of the SPV in order to maintain its 35% interest or be diluted.
18
In February 2016, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 67,000,00033,500,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.0150.03 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$1,005,000. Arnold T. Kondrat Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of the Company, acquired 60,000,00030,000,000 of the common shares issued under this private placement. Taking into account
In April 2016, the acquisitionCompany announced that its joint venture partner, Randgold, would commence a regional helicopter-borne VTEM B-Field, Horizontal Magnetic Gradiometer geophysical survey (the "JVSurvey") over Loncor's Ngayu project. The JV Survey flight path design was north-south orientated lines at 400 meter spacing for a total of these shares, Mr. Kondrat now owns an aggregateapproximately 10,000 line kilometres, of 74,300,818 common shares, representing approximately 49.1%which 4,200 line kilometers would be flown over the Ngayu project.
In June 2016, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 875,000 units of the issuedCompany at a price of Cdn$0.24 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$210,000. Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and outstandingone-half of one warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.36 for a period of two years.
18
In January 2017, the Company announced preliminary results of the JV Survey undertaken by Randgold under the Loncor Congo Joint Venture. The JV Survey was performed by Geotech Airborne Limited.
In February 2017, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 2,000,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.24 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$480,000. Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.36 for a period of two years. Also in February 2017, the Company closed a second non-brokered private placement of 750,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.26 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$195,000. Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.36 for a period of two years.
In May 2017, the Company announced that Randgold had commenced exploration ground work on priority targets resulting from the JV Survey undertaken by Randgold as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.
On June 19, 2018, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 850,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.20 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$170,000. Kondrat purchased 350,000 of the shares issued under this financing.
On June 26, 2018, private placement and share swap transactions (the "Transactions") were completed with Resolute Mining Limited ("Resolute"). Pursuant to the private placement Transaction, the Company issued 13,000,000 common shares to Resolute at a price of Cdn$0.20 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$2,600,000. Also pursuant to the terms of the private placement Transaction, (a) for as long as Resolute holds at least 20% of the Company's issued and outstanding shares, Resolute will be entitled to designate a nominee to serve on the Company's board of directors, and (b) subject to the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange, Resolute has been granted a pre-emptive right to maintain its pro rata equity ownership interest in Loncor following the completion by Loncor of any proposed equity offering. Pursuant to the share swap Transaction, Resolute purchased 12,500,000 common shares of Loncor held by Kondrat in exchange for the issuance on or before July 16, 2018 by Resolute to Kondrat of Cdn$2,500,000 worth of Resolute ordinary shares (capped at a maximum of 3,000,000 Resolute shares).
Also in June 2018, Loncor Subco acquired all of the outstanding shares of Navarro Resources SARL ("Navarro") and Devon Resources SARL ("Devon"), which held exploration permits covering ground in the Ngayu gold belt, thereby increasing Loncor's holdings in the Ngayu gold belt. The consideration for the acquisition of Devon comprised the issuance by the Company of 500,000 common shares of the Company valued at Cdn$100,000, payment of US$75,000 in cash and payment of US$190,000 in satisfaction of an outstanding loan provided by Devon to the Company. The purchase price for the acquisition of Navarro was US$300,000 which was paid for by the settlement of a US$300,000 loan provided by Loncor to Navarro.
In November 2018, the Company issued a press release providing an update on exploration activities undertaken by Randgold on Loncor's Ngayu project as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.
In May 2019, the Company issued a press release providing an update on exploration activities undertaken by Barrick Gold Corporation (through its subsidiary, Barrick Gold (Congo) SARL) ("Barrick") (Randgold and Barrick merged at the start of 2019) on Loncor's Ngayu project as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture. The Company reported that drill targets had been delineated by Barrick on a number of prospects at Ngayu and that exploration by Barrick at Ngayu in 2019 had been focused on the 30 kilometre strike Imva fold area in the west of the Ngayu belt.
19
In June 2019, the Company appointed Mr. Zhengquan (Philip) Chen as a director of the Company.
|
In September 2019, the Company implemented a consolidation of its outstanding common shares (the "Share Consolidation"), whereby all of the outstanding common shares were consolidated on the basis of one common share of the Company for every 2 (two) existing common shares. All amounts in this Form 20-F have been adjusted to reflect the Share Consolidation.
On September 27, 2019, the Company closed certain transactions provided for by the agreement (the "Kilo Agreement") entered into by the Company with Resolute (Treasury) Pty Ltd, Kilo Goldmines Ltd. and Kilo Goldmines Inc. (which is now named Loncor Kilo Inc.) ("Kilo Inc."). As a result of these transactions, Kilo Inc. is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Loncor, such that Loncor now holds, through Kilo Inc., Kilo Inc.'s mineral projects in the DRC. Loncor issued to Arlington Group Asset Management Limited ("Arlington") 1,000,000 common shares of the Company as consideration for the services rendered by Arlington in negotiating and successfully concluding the Kilo Agreement. Kilo Inc.'s properties in the DRC included a 71.25% interest in the Imbo Project in northeastern DRC (this 71.25% interest was subsequently increased to 84.68% in 2020; see below) which at the time of Kilo Inc.'s acquisition by the Company contained an inferred mineral resource of 1.675 million ounces of gold (20.78 million tonnes grading 2.5 g/t Au). Kilo Inc. also had a joint venture with an affiliate of Barrick Gold Corporation for gold and associated minerals in respect of the Isiro exploration permits in northeastern DRC. The Kilo Inc. mineral properties are located in the Ngayu gold belt near Loncor's existing Ngayu properties, and therefore consolidated ground for Loncor in the belt.
In October 2019, the Company announced the appointment of Peter Cowley as President of the Company and the appointment of Minecon Resources and Services Limited as geological consultants to manage exploration and development programs at Loncor's properties within the Ngayu greenstone belt which were outside of Loncor's joint venture with Barrick. Mr. Cowley previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 2009 to 2015. Mr. Cowley was also elected a director of the Company at the annual and special meeting of shareholders of the Company held on June 26, 2020.
In November 2019, the Company issued a press release providing an update on exploration activities undertaken by Barrick on Loncor's Ngayu properties as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.
In January 2020, the Company issued a press release providing an update on its activities at the Imbo Project.
In February 2020, the Company issued a press release providing an update on its exploration activities at the Imbo Project and Barrick's exploration activities under the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.
Also in February 2020, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 6,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$2,400,000. A total of 1,790,000 of the shares issued under this financing were purchased by certain insiders of the Company, including Kondrat who purchased 1,440,000 of the shares.
In March 2020, the Company appointed John Barker as Vice President of Business Development for Loncor.
Also in March 2020, the Company acquired an additional 5.04% interest in its subsidiary Adumbi Mining SARL ("Adumbi Holdco") pursuant to a private transaction with one of the former minority shareholders of Adumbi Holdco. This acquisition increased Loncor's interest in Adumbi Holdco from 71.25% to 76.29% (the 71.25% interest had been acquired by the Company in September 2019 as part of the Kilo Agreement; see above). Adumbi Holdco, which had changed its name from KGL Somituri SARL, holds six exploitation permits in the Ngayu greenstone belt including the Imbo Project exploitation permit.
20
In April 2020, Loncor announced a 49% increase in mineral resources at its Imbo Project. Compared to the inferred mineral resources of 1.675 million ounces of gold (20.78 million tonnes grading 2.5 g/t Au) outlined in January 2014 by independent consultants Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. on three separate deposits, Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako at Imbo, inferred mineral resources increased by 49% to 2.5 million ounces of gold (30.65 million tonnes grading 2.54 g/t Au), this increase coming from the Adumbi deposit. This assessment was undertaken by the Company's independent geological consultants Minecon Resources and Services Limited.
In May 2020, the Company issued a press release providing an update on its exploration activities at the Imbo Project and Barrick's exploration activities under the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.
In June 2020, Loncor announced that Barrick had commenced its core drilling program on several priority gold targets within the Ngayu greenstone belt, as part of its joint venture with Loncor.
Also in June 2020, Loncor announced that it had entered into a new joint venture agreement (the "New Barrick JV") with Barrick for two exploitation permits held by Adumbi Holdco covering ground contiguous to the Company's Imva area within the Ngayu gold belt. The terms of the New Barrick JV were similar to the ongoing Loncor Congo Joint Venture with Barrick.
In August 2020, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of 10,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,000,000. A total of 3,390,000 of the shares issued under this financing were purchased by certain insiders of the Company.
In September 2020 press releases, Loncor reported that:
-its common shares are now quoted on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the trading symbol LO51;
-its subsidiary, Adumbi Holdco, had been restructured as per the requirements of the OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) Uniform Act relating to commercial companies. OHADA Uniform Acts provide for a system of common business laws which have been adopted by seventeen West and Central African countries, including the DRC. The restructuring resulted in Loncor increasing its interest in Adumbi Holdco to 84.68%, minority shareholders holding 5.32% and the DRC 10%. The DRC was allocated 10% in accordance with the requirements of the new DRC Mining Code enacted in 2018. Also as a result of the restructuring, Adumbi Holdco now operates as "Adumbi Mining S.A." rather than Adumbi Mining SARL;
-recent exploration results had outlined a number of significant, undrilled mineralised trends at the Imbo Project. The focus of exploration by Loncor during 2020 was along trend in the southeast of the Imbo Project from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits previously delineated in the northwest of the 122 square kilometre Imbo Project area.
In October 2020, the Company announced that drilling had commenced at the Imbo Project, with the objective of the drilling program being to outline additional mineral resources to the then current 2.5 million ounces (inferred mineral resources of 30.65 million tonnes grading 2.54 g/t Au) at the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits.
In a November 11, 2020 press release, Loncor announced that it has entered into two new agreements with its then joint venture partner, Barrick. The ground covered by these agreements included a number of exploration targets already outlined by Barrick. Total acreage under the various Barrick/Loncor joint ventures in the Ngayu gold belt in the northeast of the DRC totaled approximately 2,000 square kilometres as a result of these new agreements.
21
In a November 23, 2020 press release, the Company provided an update on Barrick's exploration activities under the Loncor/Barrick joint ventures.
On February 12, 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement financing involving the issue of 11,500,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,750,000. Each such unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, an "A-Warrant") of the Company, with each A-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the said units. A total of 1,400,000 of the units were purchased by certain insiders of the Company.
On February 24, 2021, Loncor announced that geological mapping, soil geochemical, rock chips and channel sampling of old colonial trenches and artisanal workings had outlined four significant mineralised trends - Esio Wapi, Museveni, Mungo Iko and Paradis - approximately 8 to 10 kilometres southeast of the Adumbi deposit. The focus of greenfields exploration by Loncor is at Imbo East, along trend to the southeast from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits previously delineated in the northwest of the 122 square kilometre project area.
In press releases issued from November 2020 to November 2021, the Company announced drilling results from its drilling program at its Adumbi deposit.
In April 2021, the Company announced a 44% increase in mineral resources at its Adumbi deposit in the Imbo Project. Compared to the inferred mineral resource of 2.19 million ounces of gold (28.97 million tonnes grading 2.35 g/t Au) outlined in April 2020, further drilling increased the Adumbi inferred mineral resource by 44% to 3.15 million ounces of gold (41.316 million tonnes grading 2.37 g/t Au), constrained within a US$1,500 open pit shell. This mineral resource assessment was undertaken by the Company's independent geological consultants Minecon Resources and Services Limited.
In May 2021, the Company announced that Barrick informed Loncor that it will not be continuing exploration on the Loncor/Barrick joint venture ground.
In June 2021, the Company changed its name from Loncor Resources Inc. to Loncor Gold Inc. to better brand Loncor's business as a gold exploration company.
In July 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 7,850,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.70 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,495,000. Each such unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "B-Warrant") of the Company, with each B-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.95 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the said units.
In September 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Mr. John Barker as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of Loncor. Mr. Barker, who was Vice President of Business Development of Loncor prior to his appointment as CEO, has 17 years' experience as a leading mining equity analyst including a period as Chairman of The Association of UK Mining Analysts. Arnold Kondrat, Founder of Loncor and previous CEO, was appointed as the Company's Executive Chairman of the Board.
22
In November 2021, the Company announced an increase and upgrade in mineral resources at its Adumbi deposit in the Imbo Project. Compared to the inferred mineral resource of 3.15 million ounces of gold (41.316 million tonnes grading 2.37 g/t Au) outlined in April 2021, the additional drilling information and the increased gold price used, contributed significantly to the increased mineral resources of the Adumbi deposit with improved confidence to 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold) in the indicated category, and 1.78 million ounces of gold (20.828 million tonnes grading 2.65 g/t gold) in the inferred category, constrained within a US$1,600 per ounce optimized pit shell. 84.68% of these mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project. This mineral resource assessment was undertaken by the Company's independent geological consultants Minecon Resources and Services Limited.
In December 2021, the Company announced the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for its Adumbi gold deposit. The Adumbi PEA study was prepared for Loncor by a number of independent mining and engineering consultants led by New SENET (SENET), Johannesburg (Processing and Infrastructure) and Minecon Resources and Services Limited (Minecon), Accra (Mineral Resources, Mining and Environmental and Social) and Maelgwyn South Africa (MMSA), Johannesburg (Metallurgical test work), Knight Piésold and Senergy, Johannesburg (Power) and Epoch, Johannesburg (Tailings and Water Storage). SENET undertook the financial and economic evaluation.
In February 2022, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 5,650,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.55 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$3,107,500. Each such unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "C-Warrant") of the Company, with each C-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 24 months following the closing date of the issuance of the said units.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at: http://www.sec.gov. The Company's Internet address is www.loncor.com.
B. Business Overview
General
Loncor is a Canadian gold exploration company focusedfocussed on two projectsthe Ngayu Greenstone Gold Belt in the DRC, the Ngayu and North Kivu projects. The Ngayu project comprises 13 exploration permits (which permits are held by the Company’s wholly-owned DRC subsidiary) totaling 2,077 square kilometres that cover most of the Ngayu Archaean greenstone belt in Orientale province in the northeast portion of the DRC. The Loncor team has over two decades of experience of operating in the DRC. Loncor's growing resource base in the Ngayu Belt currently comprises the Imbo and Makapela Projects. At the Imbo Project, the Adumbi deposit holds an indicated mineral resource of 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold), and the Adumbi deposit and two neighbouring deposits hold an inferred mineral resource of 2.090 million ounces of gold (22.508 million tonnes grading 2.89 g/t Au), with 84.68% of these resources being attributable to Loncor. Loncor has been carrying out a drilling program at the Adumbi deposit with the objective of outlining additional mineral resources. The Makapela deposit (which is 100%-owned by Loncor and is located approximately 50 kilometres from the Imbo Project) has an indicated mineral resource of 614,200 ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 549,600 ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading 5.30 g/t Au).
In addition to the Ngayu properties, Loncor also has the North Kivu project comprises 49Project in the DRC, which is comprised of 46 exploration permits owned or controlled by Loncor, covering an area of 13,375approximately 13,000 square kilometres in North Kivu province located west of the city of Butembo. Both projects have historic gold production. All of the 46 North Kivu exploration permits are currently under force majeure due to the poor security situation in much of the North Kivu province.
23
Additional information with respect to the Company's projectsmineral properties can be found below in Item 4D of this Form 20-F under "Loncor"Loncor's Mineral Properties".
The Loncor Foundation
In early 2010, the Company established the Loncor Foundation, a registered charity in the DRC, funded by the Company with the goal of improving the quality of life and opportunities for communities near the Company's exploration projects. In meetings and discussions with community representatives, it was determined that the Loncor Foundation would focus primarily on health and education projects. Based on this advice, the Loncor Foundation initiated a number of community projects near the Yindi and Makapela prospects at the Ngayu project and the Manguredjipa prospect at the North Kivu project. These included the construction of a new primary school for 400 students at Yindi, which is attended by approximately 700 students. The Loncor Foundation also donated text and exercise books for teachers and students in 2011 and 2012 and made a donation of 40 hospital beds to two medical clinics in the Yindi area. Loncor Foundation projects at Manguredjipa have included financial support for a community electrification project and the construction of six showers and latrines at the Manguredjipa General Hospital, as well as the donation of a motorbike for use by medical staff at the hospital.
The primary focus of the Loncor Foundation in 2011 and 2012 was the construction of the Bole Bole medical clinic at Makapela. Also in 2012, the Foundation initiated a program to fund the salaries of 12 teachers at the Yindi primary school, eliminating the need for parents to pay tuition costs and increasing enrollment at the school. During 2013, the Loncor Foundation repaired bridges on the road between Yindi and Makapela and continued to fund teachers’ salaries at the Yindi primary school and partially fund operations at the Bole Bole medical clinic. The Foundation’s work was suspended in 2014 having regard to the Company’s financial situation and the need to conserve funds.
19
Additional information with respect to the Loncor Foundation can be found on the Company's web site atwww.loncor.com.
Exploration Permits and Exploitation Permits under DRC Mining Law
As described below under "Loncor’s Mineral Properties", Loncor holds or controls a number of exploration and exploitation permits covering ground in the DRC being explored by the Company.with respect to its exploration projects. Under DRC mining law, an exploration permit entitles the holder thereof to the exclusive right, within the perimeter over which it is granted and for the term of its validity, to carry out mineral exploration work for mineral substances, substances for which the licence is granted and associated substances if an extension of the permit is obtained. However, the holder of an exploration permit cannot commence work on the property without obtaining approval in advance of its mitigation and rehabilitation plan. An exploration permit also entitles its holder to the right to obtain an exploitation permit for all or part of the mineral substances and associated substances, if applicable, to which the exploration permit or any extension thereto applies if the holder discovers a deposit which can be economically exploited.
Under DRC mining law, an exploitation permit (the Company's Adumbi deposit is covered by an exploitation permit - see "Loncor's Mineral Properties" below for additional information in respect of Adumbi) entitles the holder thereof to the exclusive right to carry out, within the perimeter over which it is granted and during its term of validity, exploration, development, construction and exploitation works in connection with the mineral substances for which the permit has been granted and associated substances if the holder has obtained an extension of the permit. In addition, an exploitation permit entitles the holder to: (a) enter the exploitation perimeter to conduct mining operations; (b) build the installations and infrastructures required for mining exploitation; (c) use the water and wood within the mining perimeter for the requirements of the mining exploitation, provided that the requirements set forth in the environmental impact study and the environmental management plan of the project are complied with; (d) use, transport and freely sell the holder's products originating from within the exploitation perimeter; (e) proceed with concentration, metallurgical or technical treatment operations, as well as the transformation of the mineral substances extracted from the exploitation perimeter; and (f) proceed to carry out works to extend the mine. Without an exploitation permit, the holder of an exploration permit may not conduct exploitation work on the perimeter covered by the exploration permit. So long as a perimeter is covered by an exploitation permit, no other application for a mining or quarry right for all or part of the same perimeter can be processed.
|
Specialized Skill and Knowledge
Management of the Company is comprised of a team of individuals who have extensive expertise and experience in the mineral exploration industry (including, in particular, extensive expertise and experience in operating mineral exploration programs in the DRC) and exploration finance and are complemented by an experienced board of directors. See Item 6A of this Form 20-F, "Directors and Senior Management".
Competitive Conditions
The Company competes with other mineral exploration and mining companies for mineral properties, joint venture partners, equipment and supplies, qualified personnel and exploration and development capital. See Item 3D of this Form 20-F, "Risk Factors".
24
Environmental Protection
The current and future operations of the Company are subject to laws and regulations governing exploration, development, tenure, production, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, greenhouse gas emissions, protection and remediation of the environment, reclamation, mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. Specifically, the Company's projects are subject to an array of applicable norms, standards, laws and regulations. The Company holds all necessary licenses, permits and registrations, including environmental licenses and water permits, to carry out its planned current exploration activities at its projects.
Compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations increases costs and may cause delays in planning, designing, drilling and developing the Company's projects. The Company attempts to diligently apply technically proven and economically feasible measures to advance protection of the environment throughout the exploration and development process, however it is often impossible to anticipate and mitigate all administrative delays.
Foreign Operations
The Company's mineral properties are located only in the DRC and its operations are substantially carried out in that country. See Item 3D of this Form 20-F, "Risk Factors".
The Loncor does notFoundation
In early 2010, the Company established the Loncor Foundation, a registered charity in the DRC, funded by the Company with the goal of improving the quality of life and opportunities for communities near the Company's exploration projects. In meetings and discussions with community representatives, it was determined that the Loncor Foundation would focus primarily on health, educationand local infrastructure projects. Based on this advice, the Loncor Foundation initiated a number of community projects near the Yindi and Makapela prospects at the Ngayu project and the Manguredjipa prospect at the North Kivu project. These included the construction of a new primary school for 400 students at Yindi. The Loncor Foundation also donated text and exercise books for teachers and students in 2011 and 2012 and made a donation of 40 hospital beds to two medical clinics in the Yindi area. Loncor Foundation projects at Manguredjipa have any material subsidiaries, other thanincluded financial support for a community electrification project and the construction of six showers and latrines at the Manguredjipa General Hospital, as well as the donation of a motorbike for use by medical staff at the hospital.
The primary focus of the Loncor Resources Congo SARL,Foundation in 2012 was the construction of the Bole Bole medical clinic near Makapela. Also in 2012, the Foundation initiated a program to partially fund the salaries of 12 teachers at the Yindi primary school which is whollyresulted in reduced tuition costs for parents and increased enrollment at the school. During 2013, the Loncor Foundation also repaired bridges on the road between Yindi and Makapela and continued to fund teachers' salaries at the Yindi primary school and partially fund operations at the Bole Bole medical clinic. The Foundation's work was suspended in 2014 having regard to the Company's financial situation and the need to conserve funds. The Company intends to restart the activities of the Loncor Foundation in 2022.
C. Organizational Structure
The following chart illustrates the relationship between Loncor and its significant subsidiaries. The jurisdiction of incorporation of each such subsidiary and the percentage of voting securities beneficially owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, by Loncor, and was incorporatedis shown in brackets in the DRC.last line of each of the boxes of the chart.
25
D. Property, Plants and Equipment |
The Company does not have any material tangible fixed assets.
Loncor’sLoncor's Mineral Properties
Loncor’sLoncor is a Canadian gold exploration activities are focusedcompany focussed on the Ngayu Greenstone Gold Belt in the northeast of the DRC. The Loncor team has over two projectsdecades of experience of operating in the DRC. Loncor's growing resource base in the Ngayu Belt currently comprises the Imbo and Makapela Projects. At the Imbo Project, the Adumbi deposit holds an indicated mineral resource of 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold), and the Adumbi deposit and two neighbouring deposits hold an inferred mineral resource of 2.090 million ounces of gold (22.508 million tonnes grading 2.89 g/t Au), with 84.68% of these resources being attributable to Loncor. Loncor has been carrying out a drilling program at the Adumbi deposit with the objective of outlining additional mineral resources. The Makapela deposit (which is 100%-owned by Loncor and is located approximately 50 kilometres from the Imbo Project) has an indicated mineral resource of 614,200 ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 549,600 ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading 5.30 g/t Au).
26
In addition to the Ngayu properties, Loncor also has the North Kivu Project in the DRC, the Ngayu andwhich is comprised of 46 exploration permits owned or controlled by Loncor, covering an area of approximately 13,000 square kilometres in North Kivu projects.
20
Ngayu Project
Certainprovince located west of the following disclosure relatingcity of Butembo. All of the 46 North Kivu exploration permits are currently under force majeure due to the Company’s Ngayu gold projectpoor security situation in much of the North Kivu province.
The following table summarizes the Company's mineral resources for all its properties(1) as of December 31, 2021:
| Indicated Mineral Resources | Inferred Mineral Resources | |||||||
| Property | Tonnage (tonnes) | Grade (g/t Au) | Contained Gold (ounces) | Attributable Gold (2) (ounces) | Tonnage (tonnes) | Grade (g/t Au) | Contained Gold (ounces) | Attributable Gold (2) (ounces) |
| Imbo Project | 28,185,000 | 2.08 | 1,883,000 | 1,594,524 | 22,508,000 | 2.89 | 2,090,000 | 1,769,812 |
| Makapela Deposit | 2,205,000 | 8.66 | 614,200 | 614,200 | 3,223,000 | 5.30 | 549,600 | 549,600 |
| Total: | 30,390,000 | 2.56 | 2,497,200 | 2,208,724 | 25,731,000 | 3.19 | 2,639,600 | 2,319,412 |
(1)Numbers in the table may not add up due to rounding. Both the Imbo Project and the Makapela deposit are in the northeast of the DRC. The Makapela deposit is derivedlocated approximately 50 kilometres from the independent technical report (the "Ngayu Technical Report") dated May 29, 2012Imbo Project. Loncor does not have any measured mineral resources (indicated and entitled "Updatedinferred mineral resources only). Mineral resources are measured in situ.
(2)A total of 84.68% of the Imbo Project mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project. The Makepala deposit is 100%-owned by the Company.
Changes in Imbo Project Mineral Resources Since Fiscal 2020
The Imbo Project is the Company’s material project. As of December 31, 2020, the Imbo Project’s mineral resources consisted of an inferred mineral resource of 2,503,000 ounces of gold (30,650,000 tonnes grading 2.54 g/t Au). The Imbo Project’s total mineral resources as of December 31, 2021 as set out in the above table represent a 58.7% increase from the total mineral resources of the Imbo Project as of December 31, 2020. Mineral resources for December 31, 2020 were determined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Independent (“NI 43-101”), which were permitted to be disclosed pursuant to Industry Guide 7 prior to Regulation S-K 1300 becoming applicable to the Company. The book value of the Imbo Project as of December 31, 2021, as reflected in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2021, was US$9,792,812.
Imbo Project: Adumbi Deposit
Technical Report
The following is mainly a reproduction of the summary from the technical report of Minecon Resources and Services Limited (“Minecon”) entitled "Technical Report Summary on the Ngayu GoldMineral Resources of the Imbo Project Orientale Province,in the Democratic Republic of the Congo" prepared for Loncor by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Ltd ("Congo" (the "VenmynTechnical Report"). A copyThe Technical Report is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.4. Immediately following this summary are several additional maps in respect of the NgayuImbo Project taken from the Technical Report. Minecon is not an affiliate of the Company.
Introduction
Minecon Resources and Services Limited (Minecon) was engaged by Loncor Gold Inc. (Loncor) to prepare an independent Technical Report can be obtained from SEDAR at www.sedar.comSummary (TRS) with respect to Loncor's Imbo Project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The purpose of this TRS is to support the inclusion of the Imbo Project's Mineral Resource estimates in Loncor's Form 20-F annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 being filed with the United States Securities and EDGAR atwww.sec.govExchange Commission (SEC). This TRS conforms to the SEC's Modernized Property Disclosure Requirements for Mining Registrants as described in Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K, Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (S-K 1300) (including Item 601 (b)(96) Technical Report Summary).
27
Property Description and Location
The Ngayu gold projectLoncor's Imbo Project is situated approximately 300 kilometres northeast of Kisangani and 70 kilometres tolocated in the westMambasa District of the Okapi Game ReserveIturi Province, in the Orientale Provincenortheastern region of the DRC, 260 km west of Bunia, the capital of the Ituri Province, and 225 km northwest of the city of Beni. The Adumbi base camp within the Imbo exploitation permit area is located at latitude 1º 43' 58.76" N and longitude 27º 52' 4.01" E or 596,522 m E and 191,570 m N (WGS 84 UTM Zone 35N) (see Figure 1 below)1.1).
The Imbo Project covers Exploitation Permit Number 9691, has a total area of 122 km2 and encompasses the known gold mineral deposits of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako and several prospects including Canal, Bagbaie, Adumbi West, Amuango, Monde Arabe, Vatican and Imbo East. Adumbi is located approximately 220 km by air southwest from the large operating gold mine of Kibali, operated by Barrick Gold, which in 2020 produced 808,134 oz.
Figure 1.1: Location of the Imbo Project in East Africa
Mineral Rights and Land Ownership
Loncor is a publicly listed Canadian gold exploration company and holds 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project through its subsidiary Adumbi Mining S.A., with the minority shareholders holding 15.32 % (including the 10 % free-carried interest held by the Government of the DRC). The projectImbo exploitation permit is located 470 kilometresvalid until February 2039.
Minecon relied on a letter on land tenure, licences, and 400 kilometres north-northwestpermits dated June 8, 2020, from MBM-Conseil, one of Bukavuthe leading firms practising mining law in the DRC. The Imbo Project comprises a Permis d'Exploitation (PE 9691) or Exploitation Licence held by Adumbi Mining S.A., granted for the period February 23, 2009, to February 22, 2039 (and renewable for an additional 15 years), for gold and Goma, respectivelydiamonds and is situated 130 kilometres northwest of Loncor’s North Kivu project. It is made up ofcovering a total of 13 exploration permits (or "PRs") held122 km2.
28
Under an agreement signed in April 2010 with the minority partners of Adumbi Mining S.A., Loncor agreed to finance all the activities of Adumbi Mining S.A., until the filing of a bankable feasibility study, by way of loans which bear interest at a rate of 5% per annum. Within thirty days of the Company through its wholly-owned DRC subsidiary, which coverreceipt of a bankable feasibility study, the minority partners may collectively elect to exchange their equity participation for either a 2% net smelter royalty or a 1% net smelter royalty plus an areaamount equal to €2/oz of 2,077 square kilometres.
Legal Aspects and TenureProven Ore Reserves.
The Ngayu project consists of 13 PRs numbered 1793 to 1807, excluding 1795 and 1799, held by the Company’s wholly-owned DRC subsidiary. The Ngayu project PRs were renewed on February 10, 2012 and will expire on February 9, 2017. Figure 2 below shows the PR boundaries in relation to the airborne magnetic, workings and prospects of the Ngayu greenstone belt. The PR details are shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1: License Details for the PRs of the Ngayu Project
21
22
Surface Rights Owners
According to the DRC laws, the surface rights and the mineral rights pertaining to one property are not separated. Loncor therefore has access to both the surface and mineral rights to the Ngayu project.
Surface Fees and Provincial Taxes
In order to maintain2018 Mining Code imposes a PR in good standing under DRC law the title holder is required to make annual surface fee and surfaceroyalty tax paymentspayable to the State Treasury and the Provincial Tax authorities, respectively. To qualify for permit renewal the applicant must demonstrate that it has paid all surface fees and provincial taxes and has complied with environmental obligations. All surface fees and provincial taxes for the Ngayu project PRs have been paid and the PRs are currently in good standing. In 2015, amounts of US$139,609 and US$10,385 were paid for surface fees and provincial taxes respectively.
Should exploration lead to the discovery of an economic deposit the PR holder has the right to apply for aPermit d’Expoitation ("PE") or exploitation permit. The PE gives the title holder the right to carry out exploration, development, construction and exploitation works for a specific mineral. This includes the right to conduct mining operations, process and sell the mineral extracted. PEs are valid for 30 years, renewable for 15-year periods until the end of the mine’s life.
The DRC Mining Code levies a 2.5% royalty on production of precious metals. Furthermore, the DRC Mining Code stipulates that a 5% free-carried interest be awarded to a Congolese State owned company at no charge. Surface fees for PEs are US$6 per hectare (approximately US$511 per carre), irrespective of commodity.
According to DRC law there is no export duty on marketable products, but a 30% corporate tax rate is applied on corporate profits. Loncor has not entered into any other agreements which could have a material impact on the Ngayu project, other than the joint venture agreement entered into with Randgold Resources (DRC) Limited in January 2016 (see Item 4A.sale of this Form 20-F ("History and Developmentminerals, at a rate of the Company")3.5% for information in respect of this agreement).precious metals.
Environmental Liabilities
Loncor currently has no environmental liabilities or penalties pending for the Ngayu project. At this phase of exploration, very little damage has been done to the environment. Trenches dug for sampling purposes are rehabilitated fully once the sampling process has been completed. Similarly, drill pads have been rehabilitated after drilling activities. The exploration camp is built utilising an abandoned historic mining site with as little clearance as possible. Should the project be abandoned for any reason, the locals will be able to use the camp for residential purposes. Loncor does not foresee any significant environmental expenditure at this stage of the project. Each year environmental reports are submitted to the government.
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, InfrastructurePhysiography and PhysiographyInfrastructure
Altitude withinLocated approximately 225 km by air southeast of the Ngayu project area ranges from 550 metres above mean sea level to 950 metres above mean sea level. The topographyAdumbi deposit, Beni is made up of gently rolling hills and slightly incised valleys. The vegetation is typical dense forest. The region is drained by the Ituri River. Thenearest major tributaries within the Ituri River basin in this region include the Neopoko, Ngayu and Imbo rivers.
Accesspopulation centre to the Ngayu projectImbo Project and has a population of approximately 230,000. Loncor maintains an administrative office in Beni. The city has a lateritic airstrip with scheduled internal flights to other towns in DRC such as Goma, Bunia, Isiro, Kisangani and Kinshasa. The Isiro airstrip is approximately 200 km by poorly maintained dirt tracks. These tracks converge towardslateritic road to the Imbo Project. From Beni, the Imbo Project is accessible via 322 km of lateritic road to Nia-Nia (where there is a 760 kilometre well-maintained networklateritic airstrip), then to Village 47 (47 km north of gravelNia-Nia) and then via 7 km of lateritic roads that connectto the Adumbi base camp.
The nearest international airport is located at Entebbe in western Uganda and linked by 440 km of paved road to the Kasindi Uganda-DRC border, followed by 80 km of unpaved lateritic roads to Beni. Entebbe has international scheduled flights to South Africa, Europe and Asia and is also linked to other African countries as well as the in-country towns of Kisangani, Nia-NiaKinshasa and Butembo. The track between Bomili and Isiro is in extremely poor condition and only accessible by motor bike. The track between Nia-Nia, Wamba and Isiro is also in poor condition, but upgrade plans by the local authorities are in place. Kisangani has a tarred air strip and regularly receives flights from Kinshasa. There is a grass airstrip at Nia Nia and Isiro also has a gravel air strip and receives flights from Kisangani and Bunia. There is a railway running through the town of Isiro, but this is no longer in service.
23
Towns located around the Ngayu project include Bomili and Yindi within the project area, Nia-Nia, Wamba, Isiro and Kisangani outside the project boundaries. The mode of transport on the poor quality dirt roads in and around the project area is either motorbike or foot but on the better quality gravel roads, trucks, buses and utility vehicles operate. The area can be accessed by means of a helicopter.
Loncor has erected exploration camps in the Ngayu project in the vicinity of the Yindi and Makapela prospects. The Yindi camp is a self-sustaining camp, with its own power, water and road infrastructure. Potable water is sourced from a tributary of the Ngayu river and filtered on site. Supplies are driven in from various developed towns. The camp consists of an office, tents sheltered by corrugated iron, a dining hall, core shed, a clinic and a helicopter pad and yard. The Makapela camp consists of tented accommodation, offices and kitchen facilities. Power is supplied by a diesel generator at both the Yindi and Makapela camps.Lubumbashi via Nairobi (Kenya).
The climate in the eastern DRCImbo area is tropical. Ittypically tropical and is hotcharacterised by a long wet season and humidshort dry season of up to three months from mid-December to mid-March. The average annual rainfall is approximately 2,000 mm to 2,500 mm, with the highest rainfall generally occurring in October. Temperatures are uniformly high throughout the year, and there is little diurnal variability, varying between 19 °C and 23 °C, with daily lows and highs of 16 °C and 33 °C, respectively. Humidity is high throughout the year (75 % to 99 %).
The Imbo Project is located in the equatorial river basin and cooler and wetter inIturi tropical rainforest within the eastern highlands.upper reaches of the Congo River Basin. The wet season takes placeproject area topographically consists of an undulating terrain that varies from Aprilapproximately 600 m above sea level to October800 m above sea level. Most of the surface area is covered with dense evergreen forests with a closed canopy; however, the hills tend to have relatively steep slopes, and the dry season from December to February northvalley floors within the areas of the equator. Southlinear hills are relatively narrow.
The Imbo Project is drained by numerous creeks and streams, which flow into the Upper Ituri river and its main tributaries: the Epulu, Nepoko, Nduye, Lenda, Ebiena, and Ngayu rivers, which form part of the equatorupper reaches of the wet season is from November to March and the dry season from April to October. The climate facilitates exploration and mining activities all year round. Exploration is more challenging during the wet season, as roads become muddy and slippery, pits are rapidly filled by water and field mapping is more difficult.
The land around the Ngayu project is mainly equatorial rain forest, with very tall trees and grass. A few small villages exist around the project area. Some wild animals exist in and around the area but most have been hunted out by the local population. Natural water sources are abundant. Groundwater potential has not been investigated. No electricity is available in the area except in the Yindi and Makapela camps.Congo River Basin. The closest hydro-electrichydroelectric power station is situated near Kisangani.Kisangani together with the hydroelectric stations supplying power to Barrick Gold/AngloGold Ashanti's Kibali Gold Mine. The towns of Yindi, Bomili, WambaIsiro and Nia-NiaBeni are potential sources of skilled manpower, and there is sufficient local unskilled manpower in the surroundings of Adumbi.
Given its exploration stage of development, there is limited infrastructure currently available at Adumbi. Presently, infrastructure is composed of an exploration camp (the Adumbi base camp) with associated helicopter landing pad, administration building, accommodation buildings and facilities, field office, core logging and storage facilities, diesel generators and solar power generation, and a workforce.sample preparation laboratory.
29
Exploration History
HistoryBelgian prospectors were the first to discover gold on the Imbo Project in the early 1900s, with gold production focusing on alluvial deposits until the late 1930s. Primary gold mineralisation was later discovered in the bedrock of the alluvial zones and was exploited in shallow pits and trenches. This was later followed by mining from deep trenches and underground galleries. From the mid-1970s to mid-1980s, the French Geological Survey (BRGM) undertook geological investigations of the Imbo Project area.
The details of historical explorationmining rights for the Ngayu project are poorly recorded and not very clear. Gold was first prospected formineral concessions in the Ngayu regionImbo Project area were initially held by Belgian prospectors in 1909. The SocieteSociété Internationale ForestiereForestière et MiniereMinière du Congo (FORMINIERE) obtained exploration rights(FORMINIÈRE or FRM) from the 1920s to the late 1950s. The Belgian colonial state was co-owner of a 50 % stake in FRM, with the area and had evaluated the most important prospectsremainder held by 1925. FORMINIERE then obtained exploitation rights for its subsidiary company, La Societe Miniere de la Tele. No further information about the two companies is available.American interests. The Ngayu project was owned by Société Minière de l’Aruwimi – Iturila Tele (SMT), a subsidiary of FRM, oversaw development and was exploited between 1929 and 1955. No further information on historicalexploitation. Following political independence in 1960, ownership has changed hands multiple times.
Highlights of the project is available.
The database ofreported historical exploration include the Central African Museum of Tervueren notes 13 occurrences offollowing:
- 1980 to 1981: BRGM mapped and sampled the Adumbi and Bagbaie deposits on surface and in the historical underground openings. BRGM also drilled three holes at Adumbi and confirmed that (i) mineralisation extended at depth below the water table, (ii) other mineralised zones, parallel to the main one, also existed, and (iii) gold at depth was associated with sulphides.
- 1988: Bugeco International (Bugeco) produced a report on the property entitled "Gold Potential in the Ngayu
greenstone belt, sixMining District Haut Zaire: the Adumbi and Yindi Old Mines". - 2009: Kilo acquired the property and carried out extensive exploration activities including major drilling campaigns from 2010.
- By November 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project.
- 2014: An independent engineering group Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA) completed technical studies, outlined an Inferred mineral resource, and made various technical recommendations to be executed by Kilo.
- 2014 to 2017: Kilo completed 63 drillholes totalling approximately 8,900 m to test gold-in-soil and magnetic anomalies at the Adumbi South, Adumbi West and Kitenge Extension targets.
- 2017: Four deeper core holes were drilled below the previously outlined RPA Inferred resource over a strike length of 400 m and to a maximum depth of 450 m below surface. All four holes intersected significant gold mineralisation in terms of widths and grades.
- 2018 to 2019: Negligible exploration groundwork was undertaken by Kilo due to financial constraints.
- In September 2019, Loncor initially acquired a 71.25% interest in the Imbo Project, which
are hostedwas subsequently increased to 84.68 % in 2020. - April 2020: An Inferred mineral resource of 2.19 Moz (28.97 Mt at 2.35 g/t Au) was determined, constrained within a US$1,500/oz pit shell at Adumbi.
- October 2020: Loncor commenced a core drilling programme at Adumbi to increase and upgrade mineral resources within a US$1,600/oz open-pit shell and at depth. A total of 24 core holes (10,071 m) were drilled during this programme as part of the study.
30
Geological Setting and Gold Mineralisation
The Adumbi gold deposit is found within the Ngayu project area. The Tervuren database recorded historical gold production for some of the deposits occurring within the Ngayu greenstone belt. The largest hardrock gold mining operation in the NgayuArchean greenstone belt, was at Adumbi which is not on Loncor’s PRs. It is evident that mostly alluvial deposits were exploited, perhaps due to the ease of mining and due to the fact that it was mostly mined on a small scale.
Geological Setting and Mineralization
Regional Geology
Most of the Orientale Province is underlain by an Archaean Basement, called the Upper-Congo Granitoid Complex or Bomu Craton, formerly known as the Upper-Zaïre Granitoid Massif. This basement is covered by Lower and Upper Kibalian rocks, NeoArchaean in age that consist of volcano-sedimentary formations with intercalations of quartzites and itabirites. The Kibalian rocks have been metamorphosed to greenschist facies and in the project area constitute the greenstone belt. The Neoproterozoic Lindian Supergroup occurs to the south of the area and consistsone of a sedimentary sequence with a thicknessnumber of more than 2,500 metres. The rock types in the sequence are mainly arkoses, sandstones, quartzites, shales and conglomerates.
24
The Upper Congo Granitoid Complex constitutes, together with associated metasediments and volcanics, the western part of the Nyanza-KibaliArchean-aged, granite-greenstone terrain, which extendsbelts that extend from northern Tanzania into northeastern DRC and then into the Central African Republic. The greenstone belt terrain is hosted within the Kibalian series, which outcrops in numerous zones surrounded by granitoids, the most important (i.e.northeastern DRC has a number of major gold belts including Moto (Kibali), Kilo, Mambasa, Ngayu and Isiro) are more than 100 kilometres in strike length. They can be distinguished both by their shape and their lithological composition. Some of these zones constitute narrow belts (less than 10 kilometres wide, 30-60 kilometres in length) made up of units which are isoclinally folded along subvertical axial planes and sub-horizontal fold axes. Others are more or less isometric and show a synclinorial tectonic style. The former possesses a metavolcanic/metasediment volumetric ratio (v/s) of about 1 that of the latter exceeds three (up to 10).
An Upper Kibalian (v/s about 1) overlies a Lower Kibalian (v/s high) in the zones of Moto and Ngayu. Extrapolating this relationship to other zones it can be concluded that two generations of greenstones exist, the one forming narrow bands, rich in sedimentary rocks, belonging to the younger of the two generations. This distinction is also supported by geochronology. The Lower Kibalian of Ngayu and Moto is intruded by 2.8Ga old tonalities and the Upper Kibalian by 2.45Ga old granites. Most volcanics of the Lower Kibalian are akin to oceanic tholeiites while those from the upper division contain distinct andesitic members together with less typical tholeiites. Nowhere has the Lower Kibalian series been observed to be associated with high-grade gneissic rocks likely to represent their basement. The Upper Kibalian series, on the other hand, is typically associated both with the tonalite-Lower Kibalian association and with gneissic series (i.e. the West-Nile gneissic Complex) suggesting a different geodynamic setting for the two series.Isiro.
The Ruwenzori tectonic episode (ca. 2Ga old) strongly affected the southern flankmajority of the Upper Congo Granitoid Complex, which resulted in the formation of shear belts cutting through the Kibalian zones, and in the cataclasis of the associated granitoids.
In the region bodering the Western Rift, NNE-SSW trending shear belts, ca. 950Ma old, strongly reactivated parts of the West-Nile gneissic Complex. Parallel trending belts cutting through the Kibalian zone of Kilo are probably linked to the same event. The tectonic episodes of ca. 790Ma and 700Ma affected the northern flank of the Upper Congo Granitoid Complex and consequently the Kibalian zone of Moto. By reactivating the late-Archaean suture between the West-Nile Complex and the Congo Granitoid Complex, these episodes contributed to the present shape of the Moto zone.
Local Geology
The Ngayu project is located in a Precambrian greenstone belt enclosing folded and fractured volcano-sedimentary series. In the project area, both the Upper and Lower Kibalian Groups are present. The Lower Kibalian is represented by the orthogneiss complex, which is a sequence of metamorphosed granites and gneiss intruded by diorites. The Upper Kibalian represents the greenstone belt made up of metasediments and metavolcanics of greenschist facies including prominent banded ironstone units (BIF) which form prominent ridges throughout the Ngayu greenstone belt.
The Kibalian Supergroup is overlain by the early Proterozoic Lindian Supergroup, which is composed of the Penge Formation (arkoses, conglomerates and quartzites), Lenda Formation (carbonaceous sediments), Asoso Formation (intercalated schists and quartzite), Avakubi Formation (sandstones, arkoses and conglomerates), Mamungi-Kole Formation (schists, with lenses of sandstone and dolomite) and Galamboge Formation (quartzite, sandstone and arkose). World class examples of gold deposits in similar geological settings to the Ngayu project include Kilo-Moto and Geita in Tanzania. Fractured zones marked by quartz veins cross-cutting the Kibalian (including the BIF) throughout the prospect are first targets. Also of interest are fractured contact zones including cataclastic breccias between the Kibalian series and the Lindian cover deposits.
25
Property Geology
The Ngayu project covers most of the Ngayu greenstone belt and consists of three main Pre-cambrian lithological units. The granite-gneiss sequence forms the basement in the project area. The Upper-Congo granitoid complex, composed of undifferentiated Kibalian and pre-Kibalian rocks, occupies a zone in the eastern-central and in the northwestern part of the concession. Different rock types can be distinguished in the area, namely, granitoids with porphorytic texture, diorites, orthogneisses, and magmatic and anatectic rocks.
The metamorphic Kibalian rocks overlying the basement are composed of paragneissic Lower Kibalian, not identified in the project area, and of Upper Kibalian occupying the northeastern border of the concession with scattered outcrops. The greenschist facies consists of a pelitic-psammitic series with intercalations of quartzites, itabirites, para-amphibolites, metavolcanics and accessory carbonate rocks. Towards the base, quartzophyllades, micaschists and gneisses can be found. The granitic and metamorphic rocks may also be intruded by pegmatites, aplites, undifferentiated amphibolites, mafic rocks, diorites and quartz diorites as well as quartz veins and quartz veins with tourmaline.
The overlying sedimentary Lindian Supergroup is found to the southwestern part of the concession. It is composed of the Ituri Group (Penge, Lenda, Asoso Formations) and the lower part of the Lokoma Group (Avakubi Formation). The sedimentary units in the project area comprise mainly clastic sediments. Different faults cross-cut the three lithological units. Several folds have been observed in the field but no detailed structural study of this region is available.
Location of Mineralised Zones
The locations of gold occurrences within the Ngayu project are shown in Figure 2 below. The majority of these depositsbelt are located close to the contact of BIF (Bandedthe Banded Ironstone Formation)Formation (BIF). Historically, only two deposits were exploited on a large-scale by previous owners,any significant scale, namely Yindi and Adumbi. Adumbi falls outStyles of the project area in the east. Remnant mining infrastructure from previous operations at Yindi includes the old laboratory, plant and camp but are derelict. Makapela is a relatively new artisanal site which was developed by artisanal minersgold mineralisation within the last ten years and has been one of the foci of the Company’s exploration activities.
Mineralization
Gold is the only commodity to have been extracted commercially in the Ngayu belt. A few years ago Rio Tinto assessed the BIF as a potential source of iron ore, but although haematite-rich zones of good grade were reportedly drilled, tonnage was below the economic requirement. Diamonds are recovered by artisanal miners from the Ngayu River; the source of the stones is unknown, but is probably outside the area under discussion. No other mineral occurrences of potential significance are known.
Gold was discovered in the Ngayu belt by Belgian prospectorsinclude shears within the BIF or on the BIF contacts, disseminated mineralisation, and shears within basalts and schists, resulting in discrete auriferous gold veins. Artisanal mining of weathered gold mineralisation preserved as elluvial or colluvial material is widespread throughout the 1920s, and commercial production took place from both primary and secondary sources until the mid-1950s. A summary of the historical production is given in Table 2 below, although production records are incomplete and sketchy and the figures quoted represent only an approximation.
26
Table 2: Historical Gold Production for the Ngayu Belt (1925 – 1955)
| Deposit | Primary Au (oz) | Secondary Au (oz) | Total Au (oz) |
| Adumbi Area | 208,000 | 83,000 | 291,000 |
| Imva Fold Area | N/A | 200,700 | 200,700 |
| Yindi | 45,200 | 21,000 | 66,200 |
| Northern Ngayu Belt | N/A | 60,800 | 60,800 |
| Anguluku | 5,700 | N/A | 5,700 |
| Totals | 258,900 | 365,500 | 624,400 |
The most prolific area for alluvial mining was the Imva Fold area, where extensive artisanal mining continues today, and where several areas of primary gold mineralization (Matete, Nagasa, Anguluku and Itali) are currently under investigation by Loncor.
Several styles of gold mineralization have been identified in the Ngayu belt and are summarised below:
Shear-zone hosted gold:
| ||
|
Disseminated mineralization in BIF:
|
Sheeted veins:
|
Elluvial/Colluvial deposits:
Alluvial deposits:
| ||
|
Prospect-Scale Mineralization Controls
BIF (Banded Ironstone Formation)belt.
Within the Ngayu beltImbo Project area, there is a strong association between gold mineralizationmineralisation and the presence of BIF, the BIF, eitherwith the BIF constituting the host rock (e.g. Adumbi, Yindi, Makapela, Nagasa), Adumbi) or forming a significant part of the local stratigraphy (e.g. Mondarabe, Itali, Anguluku).in the Imbo Project area. The BIF forms both physical and chemical traps for mineralizingmineralising hydrothermal fluids. The iron-rich BIF is a chemically reactive rock, the main interaction with hydrothermal fluids involving the reduction of magnetite to pyrite, resulting in the precipitation of gold. Mineralisation on the Imbo Project (PE9691) is known to occur at Bagbaie (referred to as follows:Adumbi North), Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako, Monde Arabe, Maiepunji and Vatican.
| ||
|
27Adumbi is currently the most explored deposit within the Imbo Project. Adumbi forms a topographic high (Adumbi Hill) and incorporates the Canal prospect, which is the southeastern continuation of Adumbi. Based on examined drillholes, the rocks at Adumbi mainly comprise a subvertical sequence of metamorphosed clastic sediments (pelites, siltstones and greywacke) interbedded with units of BIF of varying width. The grade of metamorphism is probably lower greenschist facies, and the clastic units are petrographically classified as schists. Foliation is usually clearly defined in hand specimens although sedimentary features such as bedding are frequently preserved.
The Adumbi deposit displays five distinct geological domains with the BIF unit attaining a thickness of up to 130 m in the central part. There is a higher-grade zone of gold mineralisation termed the "replaced rock zone" (RP zone) associated with alteration and structural deformation that has completely destroyed the primary host lithological fabric. The RP zone occurs in the lower part of the Upper BIF package and in the Lower BIF package, and transgresses the Carbonaceous Marker, located between the Upper and Lower BIF packages, both along strike and down dip. The geological interpretation from the Loncor drill intersections demonstrates that the mineralised BIF increases in thickness with depth and thus confirms the existence of significant underground potential at Adumbi below the mineral resources within the open-pit shell.
The detailed logging of the mineralised cores indicated a direct relationship between gold values and the percentage of sulphide mineralisation and intensity of silicification. In general, pyrite is the dominant sulphide followed by pyrrhotite, then arsenopyrite. When pyrite and pyrrhotite are associated with arsenopyrite, the gold values are very significant, compared to when pyrite is associated with pyrrhotite only. Silica is associated with the highest degree of hydrothermal alteration within the zones and serves as a marker of mineralisation; however, without sulphides, the gold values are insignificant. Specks of visible gold are occasionally found, generally within fractures and are present in white to grey, glassy, weak to moderately brecciated quartz veins.
31
Deposit Types Gold deposits within the Imbo Project are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world. Gold mineralisation is associated with the epigenetic mesothermal style of mineralisation. This style of mineralisation is typical of gold deposits in Neo-Archean greenstone terranes and is generally associated with regionally metamorphosed rocks that have experienced a long history of thermal and deformational events. These deposits are invariably structurally controlled. Mineralisation in this environment is commonly of the fracture and vein type in brittle fracture to ductile dislocation zones. At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF horizon. Examples of similar type BIF hosted gold deposits to Adumbi include Geita in Tanzania, Kibali in northeastern DRC, Tasiast in Mauritania, Homestake (U.S.A.), Lupin (Canada) and Moro Velho in Brazil. Exploration The Imbo Project has been explored since the early 1900s by Belgian prospectors and more recently by Kilo and then Loncor. During the period 2010 to 2012, 44 trenches totalling 4,753 m were excavated over the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako targets. Accessible adits and underground workings were also geologically mapped and sampled at Adumbi; however, those at Kitenge and Manzako were not accessible. In all, a total of 907 m was sampled. By November 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project. Kilo outsourced sample preparation and analysis to independent assayers ALS Geochemistry (ALS). Drill core sample preparation was conducted at ALS Mwanza (Tanzania) from 2010 to August 2011, and then at an on-site purpose-built container facility supplied and managed by ALS Minerals. Analyses were undertaken by ALS Johannesburg (South Africa) and ALS Vancouver (Canada). In February 2014, independent consultants RPA completed an independent NI 43-101 technical report on the Imbo Project and estimated 1.675 Moz (20.78 Mt grading 2.5 g/t Au) of Inferred Mineral Resources on the three separate deposits of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako. RPA made several recommendations on Adumbi, which were addressed in subsequent exploration programmes. In September 2020, Loncor signed a management service agreement with Minecon to manage the infill and extension drilling programme on the Adumbi deposit. Drilling The more recent drilling on the Imbo Project has been carried out by Kilo and then Loncor using contract drilling companies. The drilling programmes have been carried out in phases:
As of November 15, 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project. During the 2014 to 2017 drilling programme, 63 drillholes totalling 8,900 m were drilled. 32 The 2020 to 2021 drilling campaign was carried out by Orezone Drilling and a total of 24 holes totalling 10,071.44 m were drilled at Adumbi. The drill core was systematically logged and photographed before cutting and sampling. Reflex Act II orientation survey equipment was used for core orientation at every run of 3 m in competent material to aid in structural measurements. Structural measurements taken during the routine logging were from bedding, foliation, and quartz veins whereas structural measurements from lithological contacts, joints and shears were captured in detail under a separate geotechnical logging programme. Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security During the 2014 to 2017 exploration activity, sample preparation and analyses were outsourced to the SGS laboratory in Mwanza, Tanzania (which is independent of Loncor). The SGS laboratory operates a quality system that is accredited in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and SANAS (South African National Accreditation System). The SGS laboratory acted as an umpire laboratory even while ALS Chemex was the principal laboratory; hence, correlational studies between the two laboratories have been undertaken. As part of the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme, Loncor started using the on-site sample preparation laboratory. This has helped with the enforcement of stricter QA/QC policing on the analytical laboratory. Laboratory procedures have been documented and reviewed by Minecon senior management, and internal quality control measures have been taken. Based on the documentation and discussions with the laboratory management, Minecon's senior management does not have any concerns regarding the sample preparation for all Loncor samples. Sample pulps are sent for analyses to SGS Mwanza, which serves as the primary laboratory. SGS is internationally accredited and utilises conventional sample preparation, sample analysis and associated quality control protocols. Once the samples are received at the SGS laboratory, the samples go through checking and reconciliation procedures, followed by the SGS sample preparation procedure (SGS Code PRP87). Drill core, trench, adit, pit, rock chip and channel samples were analysed for gold at the SGS Mwanza laboratory using fire assay (FA) with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) to measure the gold (SGS Code FAA505), and the analyses were carried out on 50 g aliquots. The effective range for FAA505 is 0.01 ppm Au to 100 ppm Au. In addition, check assays were carried out by the screen fire assay method to verify higher-grade sample assays obtained by fire assay. Internationally recognised standards and blanks were inserted at the Adumbi sample preparation laboratory as part of internal QA/QC analytical procedures. Additional information with respect to the internal controls that the Company uses in its exploration and mineral resource estimation efforts is included in sections 11 and 12 of the Technical Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.4. Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing Metallurgical test work (comminution and gold recovery) was performed by Maelgwyn Mineral Services Laboratory in Johannesburg on the Adumbi mineralised samples to evaluate the process route required to obtain the highest gold recoveries that can be achieved. Table 1.1 shows a summary of the Adumbi metallurgical test work results. 33 Table 1.1: Adumbi Metallurgical Test Work Results
The average diagnostic leach recovery for the fresh (sulphide) material was the weighted mean of the RP and BIF lithologies relative to the volume of their occurrence (20% RP:80% BIF) in the fresh material. Diagnostic leach recoveries of 80.10% for RP and 92.37% for BIF were realised for the fresh (sulphide) material. Comminution results indicated that both the oxide and transition material are medium hard while the fresh material indicated that it is slightly hard. In order to optimise the gold recovery, further test work was conducted on the fresh and transition material whereby gravity was followed by flotation on the gravity tails. The results showed that most of the gold can be floated into float concentrates as summarised in Table. Table 1.2: Flotation Results
The concentrate samples that were generated were not sufficient to enable further processing routes such as the following:
These recovery processes will be investigated during the next phase of the project to optimise the gold recovery in the transition and fresh ore types. Mineral Resources During Q3 of 2021, Loncor commissioned Minecon to re-evaluate and quantify the exploration work including drilling undertaken during the period 2020 to 2021. This has resulted in Minecon updating the Mineral Resource estimate of Adumbi. This follows a previous mineral resource estimate undertaken by Minecon in April 2021. 34 Compared to the Inferred Mineral Resource of 3.15 Moz of gold (41.316 Mt grading 2.37 g/t Au) outlined in April 2021 (see Loncor press release dated April 27, 2021), the additional drilling information and the increased gold price have contributed significantly to the increased mineral resources of the Adumbi deposit with improved confidence to 1.88 Moz (28.185 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) of gold in the Indicated category and 1.78 Moz (20.828 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) of gold in the Inferred category. Table 1.3 summarises the Adumbi Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources based on an in-situ block cut-off grade at a 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material, and constrained within a US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell. A total of 84.68% of the Adumbi mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project. Table 1.3: Adumbi Deposit Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources (as of December 31, 2021)
Table 1.4 summarises the Adumbi Indicated and Inferred category mineral resources in terms of material type. Table 1.4: Adumbi Mineral Resources by Material Type (as of December 31, 2021)
35 The Imbo Project Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource for the combined Adumbi, Manzako and Kitenge deposits now respectively totals 1.88 Moz of gold (28.19 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) and 2.09 Moz of gold (22.50 Mt grading 2.89 g/t Au). The total Inferred Resource is summarised in Table 1.5. Table 1.5: Inferred Mineral Resource for the Imbo Project (as of December 31, 2021)
A total of 84.68% of the Imbo Project mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project. Mineral Inventory The Mineral Inventory Statement is reported in accordance with the SEC's S-K 1300 requirements as well as NI 43-101 requirements. Table shows a summary of the Adumbi Mineral Inventory for the various material types (oxide, transition and fresh) contained within the Adumbi practical pit designs. The following summarises the pit optimisation assumptions and parameters used to constrain the depth extent of the geological model to generate the mineral inventory of the open pit for the Adumbi deposit:
36 The results from the Adumbi Whittle pit optimisation for the gold price of US$1,600/oz allowed for the selection of the optimised final pit shell (Pit Shell 40) based on the maximum undiscounted cash flow for the practical pit design. The practical pit designs were prepared using the optimised pit shells as templates. The relevant Whittle pit shells were exported from the GEMS to Surpac software, where the practical pit designs were prepared. The practical pit design incorporates the ramps together with the appropriate inter-ramp slope angles. No practical pit design was prepared for the Final Pit; hence, the optimised pit shell (Pit 40) was used to define Cut 3 for the blocks to be scheduled. The Qualified Person (QP) has performed an independent verification of the block model tonnage and grade, and in the QP's opinion, the process has been carried out to industry standards. Additional information with respect to the assumptions and criteria relating to the Company’s mineral resource estimation is included in section 14 of the Technical Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.4. Adjacent Properties In addition to the Imbo Project, there have been other mineral exploration activities in the Ngayu Greenstone Belt in recent times, and mineral resources have been defined within the belt. Since 2010, Loncor has been the largest permit holder in the Ngayu belt and has been exploring a number of prospects on its own since 2010 or in joint venture with Barrick Gold Congo SARL (formerly Randgold Resources Congo SARL) (Barrick Gold) from 2016 to 2021. Loncor undertook exploration over priority target areas at Yindi, Makapela, Itali, Matete, Nagasa, Mondarabe, Anguluku and Adumbi West prospects with airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, geological mapping, stream sediment sampling, soil and rock sampling, trenching, augering and ground geophysical surveys. During the period 2010 to 2013, Loncor undertook drilling programmes on a number of prospects in Ngayu and outlined mineral resources at Makapela in the west of the belt. At Makapela, a total of 56 core holes (18,091 m) were completed in the vicinity of the Main and North pits, and 15 holes (3,594 m) were drilled at nearby Sele Sele. In April 2013, Loncor announced mineral resource estimates for Makapela with an Indicated Mineral Resource of 0.61 Moz of gold (2.20 Mt grading at 8.66 g/t Au) and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 0.55 Moz of gold (3.22 Mt grading at 5.30 g/t Au). The deposit at Makapela is open down plunge and along strike. Besides Makapela, Loncor drilled other prospects, and significant intersections were obtained at Yindi (21.3 m grading 3.3 g/t Au, 24.0 m grading 1.5 g/t Au and 10.3 m grading 4.1 g/t Au) and at Itali (38.82 m at 2.66 g/t Au, 14.70 m at 1.68 g/t Au and 3.95 m at 19.5 g/t Au). Further exploration including drilling is warranted on other prospects within the Ngayu belt including Yambenda, Mokepa and Mongaliema. In terms of producing gold mines, the Kibali Gold Mine, approximately 220 km northeast by air from the Imbo Project, is located within the Archean-aged Moto greenstone belt and commenced gold production in September 2013. The mine is owned by Kibali Goldmines SA (Kibali), which is a joint venture company with 45% owned by Barrick Gold, 45% by AngloGold Ashanti, and 10% by Société Minière de Kilo-Moto (SOKIMO). Barrick Gold is the operator and in 2020, Kibali produced 808,134 oz of gold at an AISC of US$778/oz of gold. Kibali had Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 15.5 Moz of gold, Inferred Mineral Resources of 1.5 Moz and Proven and Probable ore reserves at the end of 2020 of 9.33 Moz (from Barrick Gold 2020 Annual Report). Kibali is Africa's largest producing gold mine. Interpretation and Conclusions Introduction The Qualified Persons (QPs) noted in the Technical Report the following interpretations and conclusions based on the review of the information available for the Technical Report. 37 Geology and Mineralisation The Imbo Project sit is found within the Ngayu Archean greenstone belt, one of a number of Archean-aged, granite-greenstone belts that extend from northern Tanzania, into northeastern DRC and then into the Central African Republic. These gold belts contain a number of major gold mines including Kibali (DRC) and Geita, North Mara and Bulyanhulu (Tanzania). Gold deposits within these belts are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world. At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF unit. Examples of similar type BIF hosted gold deposits to Adumbi include the major Geita mine in Tanzania and Kibali mine in northeastern DRC. Exploration, Drilling and Analytical Data Collection in Support of Mineral Resource Estimation Systematic exploration has been conducted on the Adumbi deposit and Imbo Project area, including airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and geophysical surveys, gridding, geological mapping, soil, trench, adit and auger sampling together with a number of core drilling programmes. Sampling, sample storage, security, sample preparation and geochemical analyses and verification are considered appropriate for the resource estimate at Adumbi. Mineral Resource Methodology and Estimation The Mineral Inventory Statement is reported in accordance with the SEC's S-K 1300 requirements as well as NI 43-101 requirements. The Adumbi Mineral Inventory for the various material types (oxide, transition and fresh) contained within the Adumbi practical pit designs consists of 1.883 Moz (28.185 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) of Indicated mineral resources and 1.777 Moz (20.828 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) of Inferred mineral resources. The data used for the resource estimate and methods employed are considered reasonable for the level of study by the QP. Open-Pit Optimisation and Mineral Inventory Pit optimisation assumptions and parameters used to constrain the depth extent of the geological model to generate the mineral inventory of the open pit for the Adumbi deposit are considered appropriate for its location and infrastructural setting with appropriate metallurgical recoveries used from the test work and a gold price of US$1,600/oz, which is below current levels. In the QP's opinion, the parameters used in the Mineral Resource to Mineral Inventory conversion process are reasonable. Recommendations Further work is warranted at Adumbi to advance the project up the value curve. A number of opportunities have been identified to increase the mineral resources at Adumbi. It is recommended that Loncor follow up on these opportunities, which include the following:
There is excellent exploration potential to further increase the mineral resources at Adumbi and within the Imbo Project. At Adumbi, the mineralised BIF host sequence increases in thickness below the open-pit shell, and wide-spaced drilling has already intersected grades and thicknesses amenable to underground mining. Further drilling is required to initially outline a significant underground Inferred Mineral Resource which can then be combined with the open-pit mineral resource so that studies can be undertaken for a combined open-pit and underground mining scenario at Adumbi. It is also recommended that infill drilling be undertaken in the deeper part of the open-pit shell to upgrade the current Inferred resources into the Indicated category. Besides increasing the resource base, a combined open-pit/underground project could increase grade throughput and reduce strip ratios with the higher grade, deeper mineral resources being mined more economically by underground mining methods, which could increase annual gold production and drive down operating costs. Minecon also recommends that further studies should be undertaken to assist in estimating historical depletions and depletions by recent artisanal mining. 38 Additional deposits and prospects occur close to Adumbi and have the potential to add mineral resources and feed to the Adumbi operation. Along trend from Adumbi, the Manzako and Kitenge deposits have Inferred Mineral Resources of 313,000 oz of gold (1.68 Mt grading 5.80 g/t Au) and remain open along strike and at depth. Further drilling is warranted on these two deposits
Additional feed for the Adumbi processing plant could also come from Loncor's 100% owned high-grade Makapela deposit, where Indicated Mineral Resources of 2.20 Mt grading 8.66 g/t Au (614,200 oz of gold) and Inferred Mineral Resources of 3.22 Mt grading 5.30 g/t Au (549,600 oz of gold) have been outlined to date with the high-grade material being able to be transported economically to Adumbi.
Additional geotechnical investigations including drilling are recommended to optimise and potentially steepen pit slopes especially for the competent fresh BIF host rock which could reduce the strip ratio and thereby lower mining costs at Adumbi.
Additional metallurgical test work, including additional flotation and petrographic studies, is recommended to confirm recoveries and reagent consumptions, and to optimise the flowsheet design. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration (2009-2015)Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Adumbi Deposit
ExplorationIn a press release issued December 15, 2021 (and filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov)), the Company announced the results of a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") for its Adumbi gold deposit. The Adumbi PEA study was prepared for Loncor by a number of independent mining and engineering consultants led by New SENET (Pty) Ltd ("SENET"), Johannesburg (Processing and Infrastructure) and Minecon Resources and Services Limited ("Minecon"), Accra (Mineral Resources, Mining and Environmental and Social) and Maelgwyn South Africa (MMSA), Johannesburg (Metallurgical test work), Knight Piésold and Senergy, Johannesburg (Power) and Epoch, Johannesburg (Tailings and Water Storage). SENET undertook the financial and economic evaluation. The Adumbi PEA was prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators. A National Instrument 43-101 technical report in respect of the Adumbi PEA dated December 15, 2021 was prepared by SENET and Minecon and filed by the Company on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).
39
Under new mining disclosure rules of the SEC, which became applicable to the Company for the first time for the purposes of filing this Form 20-F, an economic analysis (such as the Adumbi PEA) which includes inferred resources may only be included in this Form 20-F if the Form 20-F also includes the results of the economic analysis excluding inferred mineral resources. As the Adumbi PEA is based on both indicated and inferred mineral resources and does not also provide a separate analysis which excludes inferred mineral resources, the results of the Adumbi PEA are not included in this Form 20-F.
Makapela Project and Other Ngayu Properties of Loncor (2010 to 2016)
Loncor commenced its exploration activities in late 2009the Ngayu belt in early 2010 and initially included desktop research, primarily utilising data from the Royal Museum for Central Africa in Terveuren, Belgium and preliminary interpretation of airborne geophysical data, acquired by Rio Tinto in 2007. Aa base camp was established onat Yindi. Due to its large landholdings for gold in the propertyNgayu belt of 4,500 square kilometres at Yindi in March 2010. At the beginning of Loncor’s Ngayu project,that time, it was decided to divide the exploration into two concurrent programs:
| ||
|
Regional Programs
Aeromagnetic Surveys
Rio Tinto commissioned heliborne magnetic and radiometric surveys over the Ngayu belt in July and August 2008, as part of its iron ore exploration programme. Loncor was provided with this data in 2009, under the then terms of the agreement between the two companies. Thelarge land package as quickly and cost effectively as possible, in order to identify and prioritise mineralized target areas for follow-up, and enable less-prospective ground to be relinquished with confidence. This program mainly entailed a regional BLEG (Bulk Leach Extractable Gold) survey was flown by New Resolution Geophysics, on 200 metre-spaced lines orientated north-south. The average sensor terrain clearance was 32 metres, and tie linesdetailed interpretation of regional aeromagnetic data. Both these programs were flown every 2,000 metres. All the greenstone terrain covered by Loncor’s properties was included, with only the areas to the northeast and southwest, which are underlain by granitoids and Lindian cover respectively, excluded from the survey. The aeromagnetic data were interpreted by Newmont in 2011,carried out under the companies’a technology consultation services agreement. Four areas were prioritised as being lithologicallyagreement between Loncor and structurally favourable for gold mineralization, as follows:
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
28
Newmont (a shareholder in Loncor), which was entered into in February 2011 (but is no longer in place).
During 2012, Loncor undertook more detailed aeromagnetic and radiometric surveys over priority target areas (ie(i.e. Imva Fold area).
BLEG Sampling
BLEG (Bulk Leach Extractable Gold) sampling is a stream sediment sampling technique employed by Newmont worldwide in its regional gold exploration programmes. It provides a relatively fast and reliable way of assessing large tracts of land, and has been particularly effective in defining targets within the Ngayu area. The sampling methodology and analytical techniques are proprietary to Newmont, and as such, cannot be detailed herein. Following successful orientation surveys in the Yindi and Makapela areas in 2010, in which 32 samples Grids were collected, three phases of BLEG sampling were carried out as follows:
| ||
| ||
|
The results for phases 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 3 below. Six high priority (H1-H6), seven medium priority (M1-M7) and four lower priority targets (L1-L4) have been defined based on the BLEG data and the geophysical interpretation. The rationale for selecting these targets is as follows:
29
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Field duplicates were taken at a frequency of one in twenty samples and the results rigorously assessed by Newmont’s senior geochemists in Perth, Australia. It was concluded that the quality of the sampling was excellent, and that the results of the survey are reliable. Analytical duplicates and blanks were also included as part of Newmont’s internal quality control procedures. Groundwork aimed at defining drilling sites within the above target areas commenced in January 2012. This entailed soil sampling (initially on lines 320 metres apart, with in-fill to 160 metres and 80 metres where warranted), geological mapping and rock chip sampling, regolith mapping (utilizing remote sensing techniques and Newmont’s in-house expertise), and trenching and/or mechanical augering of soil anomalies. In addition, the program provides for geophysical surveys to more closely define the location of potentially mineralized zones. There is good correlation between the target areas derived from the aeromagnetic interpretation and the BLEG surveys.
30
Prospect Exploration
Grids have been established at the Yindi, Makapela, Itali, Matete, Nagasa, Mondarabe, Anguluku and Adumbi West prospects with airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, geological mapping, stream sediment sampling, soil and rock sampling, trenching, augering, ground geophysical surveys (Induced Polarisation) and core drilling being undertaken.
Table 3 below summarises During the exploration statistics forperiod 2010-2013, Loncor undertook drilling programs on a number of prospects in the Ngayu work program forbelt and outlined mineral resources at Makapela (see below) in the period 2010 – 2013.west of the belt.
ProspectsLoncor holds 100% of the Makapela project, which is a 5 kilometre radius, circular parcel of land within the western part of the Archean Ngayu Projectgreenstone belt surrounding and including the Makapela deposit. The Company has applied for an exploitation permit in respect of its ownership of Makapela as per the requirements of applicable DRC law. The application of the Company, which held an exploration permit for Makapela prior to making this application, is currently pending. See the discussion in Item 4B of this Form 20-F under "Exploration Permits and Exploitation Permits under DRC Mining Law" for a summary of exploration permits and exploitation permits under DRC law.
Yindi Prospect
Yindi is the site of an old Belgian mining operation which ceased production before independence, and which produced approximately 45,000 ounces and 21,000 ounces of gold from primary and secondary sources respectively. The Belgians primarily exploited discrete high grade quartz veins by means of adits and narrow open-pits, and limited open-pitting was also carried out on mineralized BIF. Since operations ceased in the mid-1950s, the veins have been targeted by artisanal miners.
Exploration at Yindi commenced in March 2010 with the establishment of a 2 x 6 kilometre soil sampling grid, coincident with a well-defined magnetic anomaly, and covering the area of old mining activity. Soil sampling lines were originally at a spacing of 160 metres, with infill to 80 metres in anomalous areas. All soil sampling lines were geologically mapped.
31
| Table 3: Exploration Statistics for the Ngayu Work Program (2010-2013) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Activity | Samples | ||||||||||||||||||
| Prospects | Gridd -ing (km) | IP (km) | Trenc h-ing (m) | AditM app- ing (m) | Other Channel (m) | Auger Drilling | Diamond Drilling | BLE | Stream Sediment | Soils | Rock | Adit Channel | Trenc Channel | Other Channel | Auger | DD | Thin Section | ||
| Holes | (m) | Holes | (m) | ||||||||||||||||
| Yindi | 94.16 | 23 | 486.49 | 208.30 | 388.70 | 133 | 566.90 | 18 | 3302.24 | 16 | 0 | 2362 | 189 | 227 | 525 | 424 | 558 | 3526 | 11 |
| Makapela | 189.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 242.46 | 797 | 4537.12 | 84 | 24058 | 12 | 659 | 4826 | 197 | 0 | 0 | 287 | 3381 | 6201 | 58 |
| Itali | 48.20 | 0 | 691.10 | 29.00 | 170.45 | 170 | 938.55 | 5 | 1195.43 | 0 | 0 | 1234 | 169 | 31 | 751 | 196 | 649 | 1450 | 8 |
| Anguluku | 101.28 | 47.5 | 439.85 | 173.00 | 165.93 | 126 | 381.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 560 | 2549 | 274 | 175 | 454 | 227 | 481 | 0 | 1 |
| Adumbi | 68.80 | 0 | 13.00 | 0 | 141.90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1787 | 138 | 0 | 20 | 197 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nagassa | 147.68 | 125.9 | 432.85 | 26.70 | 253.55 | 750 | 3489.39 | 9 | 2620.65 | 0 | 3815 | 373 | 34 | 481 | 309 | 3277 | 1880 | 11 | |
| Mondarabe | 157.36 | 0 | 375.21 | 0 | 489.60 | 135 | 542.70 | 7 | 1220.50 | 0 | 0 | 4047 | 362 | 0 | 385 | 580 | 561 | 1533 | 7 |
| Matete | 148.84 | 89 | 989.20 | 0 | 239.39 | 256 | 1079.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3856 | 401 | 0 | 1062 | 330 | 1110 | 0 | 8 |
| Andagbowa | 3.04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 91 | 89 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bleg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 711 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PROJECT TOTAL | 959 | 285.4 | 3428 | 437 | 2114 | 2367 | 11535 | 123 | 32397* | 739 | 1310 | 24565 | 2208 | 467 | 3678 | 2580 | 10017 | 14590 | 104 |
Channel sampling of accessible old adits and open-pits was undertaken, and several old trenches were re-excavated and channel sampled. Mechanical auger drilling was carried out to test for saprolite mineralization below soil anomalies.
Diamond drilling commenced in September 2010 and 18 holes (3,274 metres) were completed before drilling was stopped in March 2011. The drilling focussed on an area of BIF-hosted gold mineralization which was identified fromAfter undertaking soil and channel sampling, and which had been mined to a limited extent during colonial times. Holes ranged from 134 metres to 290 metres in depth (i.e. a maximum of 262 metres vertically below surface).
IP surveys were carried out in March 2013, and comprised a 1 x 1 kilometre gradient array survey, followed by two lines of pole-dipole. The objectives of this work were: (a) to assess the IP response of mineralized BIF as an orientation for surveys elsewhere in the concession, (b) to assist in determining the geometry and plunge of the BIF-hosted mineralization at Yindi, and (c) to detect possible additional mineralized zones.
The drilled rocks mainly comprise fine grained schists, which petrographic studies show were originally pellitic sediments and tuffs, now metamorphosed to lower greenschist facies. Several units of BIF up to about 15 metres in thickness are interlayered with the schists. The sequence has a consistent NW-SE strike and southwesterly dip of about 75°. Gold mineralization occurs both within the BIF and within the schist near the BIF contacts, and is associated with:
All significant mineralized intersections are shown in Figure 4 below. The better grades and widths occur in the central part, in drill holes NYDD001, NYDD003, NYDD004, NYDD005, NYDD007, NYDD008, NYDD012 and NYDD014. In these holes the mineralization associated with the main BIF horizon has an average width of 12.90 metres (10.96 metres true width) at an average grade of 2.20 g/t Au.
32
Additionalcore drilling is warranted at Yindi in order to determine a mineral resource.
Makapela Prospect
Belgian workers carried out alluvial mining in streams draining from the Makapela area during the colonial era, but no production figures are available. Primary mineralization was discovered by artisanal miners in 2006, and within four years mining was taking place in three pits to a maximum depth of about 20 metres. The pits are between 170 metres and 190 metres in length and are located along a strike of 2.2 kilometres. Exploration by Loncorprogram at Makapela commenced in MayNovember 2010 with a 7 x 2 kilometre soil sampling grid covering the areaobjective of testing along strike and at depth the sub-vertical, vein mineralized system being exploited by the artisanal activity, and extending southwestwards over stream sediment anomalies depicted on old maps from the colonial era. Lines wereminers at 160 metre intervals, with infill to 80 metres where warranted. The results indicated the possible continuation of mineralization between the Main, North and Sele Sele pits overwhich returned significant results from soil and channel sampling. Drill results at Makapela were announced by Loncor via a strikenumber of 3 kilometres. A separate soil anomaly was identified overpress releases in 2011 and 2012. Significant drill intersections included 7.19 metres grading 64 g/t Au, 4.28 metres @ 32.6 g/t Au, 3.47 metres grading 24.9 g/t Au, 4.09 metres @ 21.7 g/t Au and 4.35 metres grading 17.5 g/t Au.
40
After conducting preliminary metallurgical test work, in May 2012, the Company announced a strikemaiden mineral resource estimate for Makapela of 2 kilometres in the Bamako area, to the southeast of the Main pit. Channel sampling was carried out in the artisanal workings, and based on the encouraging grades and widths returned,4.10 million tonnes grading 7.59 g/t Au (using a preliminary drilling program of five holes was planned to test the mineralization at depth below the Main, North and Makapela pits. This program was expanded to outline the strike extent of the mineralized zones, following which a decision was made to drill sufficient intersections to provide2.75 g/t Au cut-off) for an inferred resource.mineral resource of 1.0 million ounces of gold to a maximum vertical depth 500 metres below surface with gold mineralization open at depth. The mineral resource drilling aimed to intersectwas updated in April 2013 when the mineralization on sections 80 metres apart along strike,Company announced updated mineral resource estimates for Makapela of an indicated mineral resource of 0.61 million ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading at depths8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 80 metres, 160 metres and 240 metres; intersections0.55 million ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading at 320 metres and 400 metres depths were drilled on sections 160 metres apart. 5.30 g/t Au).
A total of 56 core holes (18,091 metres) were completed in the vicinity of the Main and North pits and 15 holes (3,594 metres) were drilled at Sele Sele. In addition to the above resource drilling program, a total of 12 holes (1,560 metres) were drilled to locate potential extensions to the known reefs and new mineralized structures indicated by soil, rock chip and auger sampling.
The Makapela area is underlain by a series of basalts which strike NNE-WSW and dip to the WNW at an average of 85°. A mineralogically similar rock with a coarser texture is also common, and has been given the field name “dolerite”. However, it has gradational contacts with the fine-grained basalt, and is interpreted to represent the central parts of thick flows, rather than intrusive sills. Several units of BIFBanded Ironstone Formation (BIF) are interlayered with thewithin basalts, and range up to 13 metres in thickness, although the width is generally less than 6 meters. Quartz porphyry and quartz-feldspar porphyry dykes and sills are also present, and petrographic examination shows that they are quartz-dioritic to tonalitic in composition.present. In the vicinity of the mineralized zones, these intrusivesthe intrusive units are generally no more than a few metres in width, and are probably apophyses off a larger porphyry body located about 200 metres to the NW.width.
Three styles of gold mineralization are present at Makapela:
(a)
- Quartz veins emplaced into shear zones within the basalt
sequence, which are either parallel to strike or cross-cut the lithological strike at acute angles.sequence. The best developed and economically significant vein (Reef 1) is exploited in the Main pit and consists of white quartz with irregularly distributedpyrite as disseminations and blebs averaging about 3%.pyrite. Visible gold is quite common, occurring in 28% of the intersections as isolated specks and small aggregates up to 2 mm across. Reef 1 has been intersected over a strike length of 480 metres and to a vertical depth of 480 metres, and dips to the WNW at 80 - 90°. It has an average true width and grade of 2.15 metres @ 11.15 g/t Au.A characteristic of Reef 1 is the good geological continuity between drill sections; although the width and grade is variable, the vein was present in almost all holes, in approximately the expected position. The basalt hosting Reef 1 shows intense hydrothermal alteration for several metres into the
hangingwallhanging wall and footwall.The alteration consists mainly of pervasive chlorite with abundant finely disseminated pyrite.33
34(b) Strike-parallel
- A second style containing strike-parallel mineralization up to 6 metres in width is closely associated with shearing within and on the margins of narrow BIF units. The most important zone (Reef 2) is exploited in the North pit.
The alteration assemblage frequently obliterates all traces of the original rock fabric, and consists of smoky grey, brecciated quartz and chlorite with common disseminations and stringers of pyrite (Plate 8). The sulphide content is variable and averages about 8%. In some intersections, remnant magnetite is present as isolated grains and fragmented bands within the quartz, whilst relatively unaltered BIF locally occurs in the immediate footwall of the alteration.Visible gold is much less common than in Reef 1 occurring in 5% of intersections.Reef 2 has been intersected on the North pit trend over a strike length of 800 metres, the most significant grades occurring in the northern section over a potential strike length of 480 metres. In this northern area, which has been drilled to a maximum vertical depth of 418 metres, the mineralization has an average true width of 3.52 metres with an average grade of 8.44 g/t Au. Several metres of pervasive chlorite and finely disseminated pyrite occur as an alteration halo to Reef 2, similar to Reef 1. As with Reef 1, Reef 2 shows excellent geological continuity, the altered BIF horizon being intersected in all holes in the expected position. The better developed part of Reef 2 occurs at relatively shallow depths with a plunge of about 10 ° to the NNE, before assuming a very steep plunge to the SSW. It is possible that the Reef 2 mineralization represents the lower part of a sigmoidal structure, the upper “tail” of which has been lost by erosion.A minor zone of mineralized BIF (Reef 3) occurs 70 – 170 metres in the footwall of Reef 2. It is thinner, more irregularly mineralized and has a much shorter strike than Reef 2, and has little economic significance.Mineralization in the Sele Sele pit, 2 kilometres NNE of the North pit, has similar characteristics to Reef 2, and is interpreted to be on the same BIF
unit, based on continuity of the soil anomaly, augering and limited diamond drilling between the two pits.unit. However, the Sele Sele zone is generally wider and lower grade than in the North pit area, the best intersection drilled being 15.68 metres @ 5.35 g/t Au.Pyrrhotite is commonly associated with the pyrite in the Sele Sele area, and is locally the dominant sulphide phase.The mineralization plunges to the SSE at about 40°.
- A third area of Reef 2 style mineralization occurs in the Bamako area where channel sampling returned an intersection of 4.60 metres @ 11.42 g/t Au. The mineralization is associated with a
2 kilometre2-kilometre long soil anomaly, and although the best intersection from preliminary drilling was of relatively low grade (3.60 metres @ 4.43 g/t Au), further work is warranted.
Figures 5 and 6 below highlightThe deposit at Makapela is open down plunge creating the drill intersections on Makapela Mainprospect of drilling to North area and Sele Sele area respectively.
Itali Prospect
The Itali prospect is located at the eastern end of the Imva Fold structure, 40 kilometres to the northwest of Yindi and 10 kilometres south of Makapela. Lithologies comprise an interbedded sequence of BIF, basaltic volcanics and metasedimentary schist. Post-deformation, dioritic intrusives occur within and on the flanks of the fold. Extensive strike-parallel faults have been interpreted from aeromagnetic data, and are possibly thrusts that formed during the NNW-SSE compression and folding event. Five drill holes have been completed at Itali. The first hole was drilled to test a trench intersection of 42.50 metres at 2.11g/t. The drill hole was 161.85 metres in length and inclined at -50 degrees to the south, and was drilled parallel to and immediately below the trench.current 500-metre depth to extend the resources as well as potentially exploring for additional resources between the main target areas delineated and further along the regional structure. It is also considered unlikely by Loncor that all the mineralized bodies are outcropping and good potential exists for locating blind mineralized shoots along well-defined structures with an aggregate strike of over 5 kilometres.
3541
36
37
The main mineralized zone consists of quartz veinsBesides Makapela, Loncor drilled other prospects during this period and veinlets within basalt, overlain by graphitic schist. Two lower-grade zones occur in the vicinity of the basalt/schist contact. The main mineralized zone of 38.82significant intersections were obtained at Yindi (21.3 metres grading 3.3 g/t Au, 24.0 metres grading 1.5 g/t Au and 10.3 metres grading 4.1 g/t Au) and at Itali (38.82 metres at 2.66 g/t Au, dips at 52° to the north, strikes east-west, and correlates closely with the trench intersection. The rock is completely oxidised to a vertical depth of 110 metres below surface.
Intersections in the subsequent holes, drilled to test the mineralized zone down dip and along strike, include: 21.20 metres @ 0.68 g/t Au (Hole 2), 10.15 metres @ 1.07 g/t Au (Hole 3), 14.70 metres @ 1.68 g/t Au and 3.95 metres @ 19.5 g/t Au (Hole 4)Au). Ground geophysics
At the end of 2013, due to a significant drop in the gold price, exploration was reduced and no further ground geophysicsdrilling was undertaken by Loncor.
Additional information with respect to the Company's Makapela project, and drilling will be required to determine the strike potential, and to identify the higher-grade partscertain other properties of the mineralized package.
Mondarabe Prospect
Soil sampling and rock chip sampling at Mondarabe delineated two anomalous areas: one to the northCompany in the vicinityNgayu gold belt, is contained in the technical report dated May 29, 2012 and entitled "Updated National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Ngayu Gold Project, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Mondarabe artisanal workings, where +100 ppb values (maximum of 2,350 ppb Au) occur over a strike length of 960 metres; and one in the southern part of the grid, on a hill associated with folded BIF. Five diamond drill holes have been completed on the northern anomaly where gold mineralization is associated mainly with foliation-parallel quartz veins and veinlets within a series of metapelites, intruded by sills of dolerite and minor quartz porphyry. Shearing has preferentially affected the dolerite, and hydrothermal fluids have mineralized the shear zones to varying degrees. The most significant mineralized intersections included 10.46 metres grading 2.01 g/t Au, 2.14 metres grading 31.1 g/t Au and 0.66 metres grading 148 g/t Au.
Two drill holes were completed on the southern soil anomaly area which is associated with folded BIF. Both holes intersected significant widths of BIF with individual units of up to 96 metres, interbedded with sericite schist. The BIF is locally quartz-veined and pyritized, the sulphide occurring as disseminated crystals, massive bands and patches. Despite the fairly widespread hydrothermal alteration, the mineralized zones intersected were relatively narrow, the best intersections in holes 6 and 7 being 3.23 metres grading 3.78 g/t Au and 1.23 metres grading 9.46 g/t Au respectively. Additional ground geophysics (I.P. surveys) and drilling is required to fully assess this prospect.
Nagasa Prospect
The Nagasa prospect is located on the southern limb of the Imva Fold, and is underlain by schists containing several BIF horizons which strike east-west and dip steeply to the north. Strike-parallel faults, probably thrusts, are interpreted from the aeromagnetic data. A prominent BLEG anomaly is found at Nagasa.
The area is characterized by a relatively complex regolith cover, comprising a colluvial layer up to 3 metres thick containing abundant quartz clasts, overlain by a fine grained silty clay layer, interpreted to be palaeo-alluvium. The matrix of the colluvium is auriferous and is extensively pitted by artisanal miners, soil anomalies occurring where the colluvial material has been brought to surface. A +100 ppb soil anomaly with a strike of 3.5 kilometres is present in the eastern half of the grid, with values of up to 4,070 ppb Au. A second soil anomaly with a strike of about 1 kilometre occurs in the west.
Due to the overburden (regolith) covering much of Nagasa, it was decided to undertake geophysical IP ground surveys with the objective of detecting mineralized units below the regolith cover. IP surveys were conducted over an initial 2 kilometre x 2 kilometre block at Nagasa, and three well-defined anomalies were delineated. Additional IP surveys were subsequently carried out to the east and west to determine the strike potential of the anomalies. The southernmost Anomaly (Anomaly 1) has a strike length of at least 6 kilometres, and is associated with zones of colluvial workings and with localized remnants of colonial mining activity. Pole-Dipole IP arrays were also undertaken to produce pseudo cross sections which indicated that the higher chargeability anomalies were located at depth.
38
Two diamond drill holes, with a strike separation of 2,800 metres, were drilled to test Anomaly 1. IP Anomaly 2 was defined over a 2.9 kilometre strike and is located 500 metres north of, and parallel to Anomaly 1. Two wide spaced holes, 500 metres apart, were drilled into Anomaly 2. Again the higher chargeability anomalies from the Pole-Dipole sections appeared to be more prominent at depth and did not come to surface. One core hole was also drilled into the 5 delineated 1.6 kilometre IP Anomaly 3 which is located about 1 kilometre north of Anomaly 2, and occurs on a topographic high associated with the main BIF unit. Four other shallower diamond drill holes have also been completed by the Company at Nagasa. No significant mineralized zones were drilled at IP Anomaly 2 and Anomaly 3 although broad zones of hydrothermal alteration were intersected while at Anomaly 1, the most significant intersections were 3.72 metres grading 3.17 g/t Au, 2.00 metres grading 2.22 g/t Au and 0.41 metres grading 27.4 g/t Au. Further closer spaced drilling is required to delineate discrete mineralization within the broad hydrothermally altered zones at Nagasa.
Matete and Anguluku Prospects
Ground geophysical IP surveys were undertaken during 2013 at the Matete and Anguluku prospects where the surface expression of mineralization may be masked by the presence of transported overburden. Both prospects were initially identified as high priority BLEG targets and the airborne magnetic data indicated structurally favourable (folded and faulted) BIF. At both Matete and Anguluku, gradient array and pole-dipole IP surveys delineated a number of IP anomalies that require follow up core drilling.
Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security
Section 10 of the Ngayu Technical Report (which section is entitled “Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security”) is incorporated by reference into, and forms part of, this Form 20-F.Congo". A copy of the Ngayu Technical Reportsaid report can be obtained from SEDAR atwww.sedar.com and EDGAR atwww.sec.gov.
Data VerificationJoint Ventures between Loncor and Barrick in the Ngayu Belt (January 2016 to May 2021)
Section 11Loncor had several joint ventures with Barrick (TSX: "ABX"; NYSE: "GOLD") covering properties held by Loncor in the Ngayu belt. The joint venture areas were located approximately 220 kilometres southwest of the large Kibali gold mine, which is operated by Barrick. As per the joint venture agreements entered between Loncor and Barrick (the first of which was signed in January 2016), Barrick managed and funded all exploration on approximately 2,000 km2 of Loncor ground in the Ngayu belt until the completion of a pre-feasibility study on any gold discovery meeting the investment criteria of Barrick. Subject to the DRC's free carried interest requirements, Barrick would earn 65% of any discovery with Loncor holding the balance of 35%. Loncor would be required, from that point forward, to fund its pro-rata share in respect of the discovery in order to maintain its 35% interest or be diluted. Loncor's Imbo and Makapela Projects, as well as the Yindi prospect, did not form part of the joint ventures with Barrick.
The Kibali Gold Mine, approximately 220 kilometres northeast by air from the Imbo Project, is owned 45% by each of Barrick and AngloGold Ashanti with Societe Miniere de Kilo-Moto (SOKIMO) owning the remaining 10%. Barrick is the operator of this mine. In 2020, Kibali produced 808,134 ounces of gold.
In January 2017, Loncor announced preliminary results of the geophysical airborne survey undertaken by Randgold as part of its joint venture with Loncor (it is noted that Randgold and Barrick merged under Barrick's name in early 2019). A 10,013 line-kilometre helicopter borne electromagnetic 'VTEM' survey was completed over the Ngayu belt. This survey provided a valuable additional layer of geological information through mapping the conductivity nature of the belt. The new data assisted with resolving the lithological nature of the belt as well as assisting in identifying major structures and areas of structural complexity.
The belt scale exploration strategy of Barrick was to focus on the discovery of large high-quality gold deposits by rapidly identifying and progressing targets that show the potential to meet these filters. Gold mineral resources had already been identified within the Ngayu greenstone belt in the Makapela and Adumbi deposits, and the objective was to further unlock the potential of the Ngayu Technical Report (which sectiongreenstone belt for a world class discovery using cutting edge geophysics, geochemistry, structural interpretation and driven by an experienced and proven exploration team on the ground.
42
By the end of 2019, Barrick had identified a number of priority drill targets which were to be drilled during 2020. Barrick commenced its drilling program in June 2020. Initial results under the Barrick drilling program were announced by Loncor in November 2020.
In May 2021, Barrick informed Loncor that it would not be continuing exploration on the Loncor/Barrick joint venture ground. Loncor is entitled “Data Verification”) is incorporated by reference into, and forms part of, this Form 20-F. A copyassessing the results of the Ngayu Technical Report canjoint venture programme. In particular, the Mongaliema and Mokepa prospects, which are close to Makapela, are planned to be obtainedfurther investigated by Loncor. At Mongaliema, the target area is a west-northwest trending shear zone hosted within altered metasediments with cherty units near the contact of a dolerite intrusive. Pitting has demonstrated that much of the area is covered by thick transported cover which hinders near-surface exploration. Pitting was undertaken to the southwest of the trench, which graded 32 metres at 1.37 g/t Au. Results from SEDAR atwww.sedar.com and EDGAR atwww.sec.gov.
Metallurgical Testing
Initial bottle roll metallurgical testwork forpits in excess of 5 metres deep confirmed the Makapela prospect were undertaken in 2012 in order to obtain preliminary indicationssouthwestern extension beneath thick transported alluvial material, with an average high grade of gold recovery18.13 g/t Au from 11 samples. Further work is warranted from the mineralized zones. Bottle roll is a preliminary metallurgical testresults received to date at Mongaliema. Mongaliema will be evaluated to determine how much and how easily gold maywhether it has the resource potential to be liberated from an ore using cyanide. Samples from Reef 1, Reef 2 and Sele Sele were selected for bottle roll tests at SGS in Mwanza. For Reef 1, ten core samples from two boreholes with grades from 2.50 g/t to 59.03 g/t Au (average grade 19.6 g/t Au) were used for the testwork and for Vein 2, 15 core samples from two boreholes with grades from 1.29 g/t to 76.33 g/t Au (average grade 15.24 g/t) were utilised. From the Sele Sele area, 14 core samples from one borehole grading 2.54 g/t to 18.17 g/t Au (average grade 7.30 g/t Au) were used.
For the bottle roll testwork, each core sample was crushed down to minus 2mm and pulverized down to 90% passing 75microns. Triplicate samples were analysed by fire assay to determine the average head grade of each sample. A 1.5 kg pulverised sample was then bottle rolled for 24 hours in a diluted cyanide solution to extract the gold. Gold analyses were then undertaken on the total gold in cyanide solution and the grade in the sample tails to arrive at the amount of gold extracted by the cyanide solution and the gold remaining in the leached tails. The results are summarised in Table 6 below.
39
Table 6: Bottle Roll Metallurgical Testwork Results
| VEIN | NO. OF SAMPLES | MIN. MET RECOVERY(%) | MAX. MET RECOVERY(%) | AVG MET RECOVERY (%) |
| 1 | 10 | 70.8 | 97.6 | 84 |
| 2 | 15 | 50.6 | 100 | 80.6 |
| Sele Sele | 14 | 16.1 | 93.5 | 55 |
The results indicate that Veins 1 and 2 are not refractory and have good metallurgical recoveries. Sele Sele requires further mineralogical and leaching testwork to investigate the wide variability on results to define leach characteristics and so the recoveries can be optimised.
Additional metallurgical testwork was initiated in 2013 but were not completed.
Mineral Resource Estimates
In April 2013, the Company announced increases and upgrades of mineral resources at the Makapela prospect compared to the maiden mineral resources announced by the Company in May 2012. The updated mineral resources incorporated an additional 13 core holes from the initial, inferred-only maiden resource.
Tables 7 and 8 below summarise the current indicated and inferred mineral resources at Makapela using various cut-off grades including a base case economic cut-off grade of 2.75 g/t Au that used a US$1,500/ounce gold price and appropriate cost parameter assumptions and metallurgical recoveries. Core drilling began at Makapela in October 2010 and has focused on a quartz vein system within a sequence of basalts, thin units of banded iron formation and dolerite sills of Archaean age. A total of 71 core holes totalling 21,635 metres (including deflections) have been used to estimate these indicated and inferred mineral resources at Makapela. Drilling has been focused on three main veins: Reef 1, Reef 2, and Sele Sele that occur over a total strike length of 2.2 kilometres. Core drilling was undertaken on an approximate grid pattern of 80 by 80 metres down to a vertical depth of 240 metres and then on a 160 by 80 metre grid pattern down to a maximum depth of 480 metres.
Table 7: Makapela Indicated Mineral Resources (with an effective date of April 9, 2013)
| Cut-off Grade (g/t Au) | Average Grade (g/t Au) | Tonnes (Mt) | Gold Content (Ounces) |
| 1.00 | 7.45 | 2.683 | 643,000 |
| 2.00 | 8.14 | 2.407 | 629,700 |
| 2.75* | 8.66 | 2.205 | 614,200 |
| 3.00 | 8.87 | 2.130 | 607,200 |
| 4.00 | 9.97 | 1.764 | 565,500 |
Minimum mining true thickness of 1.5 metres. *Cut-off grade estimated using a US$1,500/ounce gold price with appropriate cost parameter assumptions for mining and other economic factors.
40
Table 8: Makapela Inferred Mineral Resources (with an effective date of April 9, 2013)
| Cut-off Grade (g/t Au) | Average Grade (g/t Au) | Tonnes (Mt) | Gold Content (Ounces) |
| 1.00 | 3.49 | 6.944 | 779,800 |
| 2.00 | 4.29 | 4.900 | 675,900 |
| 2.75* | 5.30 | 3.223 | 549,600 |
| 3.00 | 5.69 | 2.781 | 508,700 |
| 4.00 | 7.26 | 1.640 | 382,600 |
Minimum mining true thickness of 1.5 metres. *Cut-off grade estimated using a US$1,500/ounce gold price with appropriate cost parameter assumptions for mining and other economic factors.
In terms of material type, approximately 9% of the total mineral resources are in oxides, 6% in transitional and 85% in fresh rock.
These mineral resource estimates were prepared by independent consultants Venmyn Deloitte ("Venmyn"). The geology and drilling information was analysed, interpreted and estimated by Andrew Clay of Venmyn, who is a "qualified person" as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Clay visited the site to review data collection procedures, geological interpretations and modelling, and estimation using geostatistical techniques. Venmyn also reviewed the geological and grade continuity to supplement the review of data quality in order to confer mineral resource classification categories to reflect the variable sample coverage. Venmyn is satisfied that all drilling, sampling, database and geological modelling protocols complycombined with the standards prescribed by National Instrument 43-101.nearby Makapela deposit.
The following key assumptions, parameters and methodologies were used to estimate the mineral resources:
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Drill cores for assaying were taken at a maximum of one metre intervals and were cut with a diamond saw with one-half of the core placed in sealed bags by Company geologists and sent to the SGS Laboratory (which is independent of the Company) in Mwanza, Tanzania. The core samples were then crushed down to minus 2 mm, and split with one half of the sample pulverized down to 90% passing 75 microns. Gold analyses were carried out on 50g aliquots by fire assay. In addition, checks assays were also carried out by the screen fire assay method to verify high grade sample assays obtained by fire assay. Internationally recognized standards and blanks were inserted as part of the Company's internal QA/QC analytical procedures.
41
A total of 2,614 core samples were taken to determine relative density measurements for the various reefs and oxide, transitional and fresh rock components.
Exploration Plans at Ngayu
Since 2013, no drilling has been undertaken and the Yindi camp was put on care and maintenance due to funding constraints.
The status of exploration, exploration potential and recommended future exploration programs are summarised for the various prospects at Ngayu as follows, subject to sufficient funding being available for the Company:
42
| |||
North Kivu Project
Loncor owns or controls a contiguous block of 4946 exploration permits (or "PRs") covering an area of 13,375approximately 13,000 square kilometers to the northwest of Lake Edward in the North Kivu province in the DRC. The areas covered by these PRs are located between the two major gold belt terrains of the DRC: the Twangiza-Namoya gold belt, owned by Banro Corporation Ltd., and the Kilo-Moto gold belt, previously controlled by Moto Gold and now owned by RandgoldBarrick and Anglogold Ashanti. In addition to gold, there are a number of alluvial platinum occurrences in the project area, including the type locality for the platinum selenide mineral luberoite near Lubero. To date, no primary source has been found for the alluvial platinum occurrences. Due to to the poor security situation in much of the North Kivu province, all of the North Kivu PRs are currently under force majeure.
43
Historical data was compiled from the colonial period of alluvial gold mining and exploration which outlined ten gold prospects for follow-up, the most prospective being the Manguredjipa prospect where 300,000 ounces of alluvial gold was reportedly mined during the colonial period up to 1960. Other gold prospects warranting follow up included Lutunguru, Lubero, Makwasu, Lutela, Bilolo, Manzia, Mohanga and Ludjulu.
The Company’sCompany's most explored gold prospect area within the North Kivu project area has been Manguredjipa.
Manguredjipa
Certain of the following disclosure Information relating to the Manguredjipa prospect is derived fromincluded in the independent technical report (herein referred to as, the "Manguredjipa Technical Report") dated February 29, 2012 and entitled "National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Manguredjipa Gold Project, North Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo" prepared for Loncor by Venmyn.. A copy of the Manguredjipa Technical Reportthis technical report can be obtained from SEDAR atwww.sedar.com and EDGAR atwww.sec.gov.
Property Description and Location
The Manguredjipa area is located in the North Kivu Province of the DRC, approximately 80 kilometres northwest of Lake Edward, as shown in Figure 1. Manguredjipa forms part of Loncor’s extensive North Kivu project area. The project was delineated from Loncor’s program of historical records commissioned in 2008 as one of the primary targets to pursue and conduct further studies on. The project consists of four PRs 1380, 1381, 1718 and 1719, two of which (1380 and 1381) are owned by Loncor through its wholly-owned DRC subsidiary, while the other two are under option. The project was delineated into three prospective targets, namely Durba, Manguredjipa West and Muhanga.
Manguredjipa is situated approximately 60 kilometres (95 kilometres by road) northwest of Butembo and approximately 80 kilometres west of Beni and 395 kilometres west of Kisangani. Manguredjipa is situated approximately 220 kilometres northwest of Goma and 275 kilometres northwest of Kigali in Rwanda. The Manguredjipa area is regionally served by primitive infrastructure and serviced by a gravel road from Butembo.
According to DRC law, the surface rights and the mineral rights pertaining to one property are not separated. Loncor therefore owns or has option rights to the licences to both the surface and mineral rights to the Manguredjipa project.
In order to maintain a PR in good standing the title holder is required to make annual surface fee and surface tax payments to the State Treasury and the Provincial Tax authorities, respectively. However, all 49 PRs comprising the North Kivu Project are under force majeure where no fees or taxes are payable during the force majeure period.
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
The Manguredjipa project area occurs to the south of the Mobissio and Mutumbi highland ridge which trends northwest-southeast across the region. This elevated ridge forms the main watershed of the region. Topographically the area is hilly with deeply incised valleys with an average elevation of 1,000 mamsl, ranging from 700 mamsl to 1,500 mamsl. The hilltops rise more than 50 metres above the surrounding drainage basins and in the western Lenda-Biaboy basins the hills are steeply sided with slope angles of up to 35°. The hills in the southern Eohe basin are less steeply sided, with slopes of 15°.
44
The area is covered by equatorial rain forests and thick grassy hilltops. Scattered rubber and palm tree plantations date from the colonial era.
Access to the project area is primarily by gravel road from Butembo. In the past, the area can be reached by light aircraft due to the existence of an airstrip near the old Manguredjipa camp. Other usable airstrips are situated in Butembo, Lubero and Beni. An 800 metre unused airstrip is located at Etaetu approximately 58 kilometres west of Manguredjipa but this airstrip is now covered by vegetation. The main road north from Goma to Beni also provides access to the towns of Lubero and Butembo. Existing infrastructure is best developed and therefore concentrated along the main road between Goma in the south and Beni in the north.
The nearest village to the site is Mangazi village, situated a few kilometres south of the main artisanal workings. The Manguredjipa property lies within the Lubero Territory under thecollectivitéof Bapere. The indigenous people are Bapiri and their main source of income is through subsistence farming and artisanal mining. Goma, Butembo and Beni are the principal commercial centres in the northeastern DRC.
In relation to the existing infrastructure of the North Kivu Province, the Manguredjipa project is well placed. The mode of transport for the general population is mainly trucks and buses on the road to Butembo, which has deteriorated sinceNo exploration began in 2008, but is constantly maintained by Loncor for ease of passage. The project’s exploration team utilises mainly utility vehicles and, where there are no roads, travel is by foot. In some cases a helicopter has be utilised to gain access to remote areas.
The climate in the eastern DRC is tropical. It is hot and humid in the equatorial river basin and cooler and wetter in the eastern highlands. The wet season takes place in April to October and the dry season from December to February north of the equator. South of the equator the wet season is from November to March and the dry season from April to October. The climate facilitates exploration and mining activities all year round. Exploration is more challenging during the wet season, as roads become muddy and slippery, pits are rapidly filled by water and work in the field becomes difficult.
Historical Exploration
During the colonial period up until 1960, the Belgians sampled rivers and tributaries using sluices for gold and diamonds, recording their findings onto detailed plans held at the Tervuren Museum in Brussels. The North Kivu area was historically a significant producer of alluvial gold and platinum. Exploration and mining took place from 1923 to 1960 when low gold prices and civil unrest caused the cessation of activities.
Alluvial gold was first reported in the North Kivu region in 1913 and reports of gold discoveries continued into the 1920s. Regional infrastructure to support the mining industry was established from the 1930s with the town of Butembo becoming the main mining centre in the region. Intense exploration for alluvial and primary precious metals was conducted over a period of about fifty years. Exploration included both surface and underground investigations using systematic sampling, pitting and trenching.
Historic exploration and production on the Manguredjipa project area was from the Lenda drainage which was explored and exploited for alluvial gold from 1925 to 1960. The term “Division Lenda” in various reports, has been noted as referring to the entire goldfield including Manguredjipa, Motokolea, Mabea, Makwasu, Eohe and Biaboy
45
Geology and Mineralisation
The regional geological history of the DRC is directly relevant to the prospectivity of the North Kivu region. Several broad geological terrains occur in the North Kivu and South Kivu districts with specific, genetically related metallogenic provinces. The northern area consists of an Archaean greenstone belt and granite-gneiss basement (3.5 -3.2Ga), while the central and southern parts are comprised of Mesoproterozoic (1.6Ga -950Ma) mobile belts formed during the Kibaran orogeny datedundertaken at 1,400-950Ma.
The deposit occurs within the Kibaran orogenic belt which contains renowned metallogenic provinces genetically related to the protracted history of tectonism, volcanism and metamorphism of the belt. The local geology of the Manguredjipa project area consists of E-W trending sequences of arkoses, conglomeratic arkose, schists and basic intrusive, as determined from literature studies.
The primary mineralisation appears to be typical of that associated with greenstone and mobile belts, where syngenetic gold has been mobilised during tectonism and complex structural and chemical controls. Concentration and re-deposition of ore minerals has occurred in veins and disseminated mineralisation along structural or chemical features.
These processes are consistent with the complex and protracted geological and tectonic history of the Kibaran Belt and the genetic model is further complicated by magmatic intrusive events that introduced epithermal fluids, heat sources and additional metallic elements. The areas are considered highly prospective as only limited exploration has taken place using modern exploration techniques.
Loncor Exploration (2008 to 2012)
Exploration by Loncor commenced in 2008 with the interpretation of airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys which were flown over a portion of the Loncor owned PRs by New Resolution Geophysics (NRG) in July and August 2007. The area covered by the survey is located 390 kilometres east of Kisangani and 230 kilometres north of Goma. The Manguredjipa licence area covers almost the entire southern half of the geophysical survey area. The combined geophysical survey identified 14 potential exploration targets.
In addition, historical data during colonial times was evaluated from the Tervuren Museum in Brussels from which a number of priority gold targets were outlined including Lutunguru, Lubero, Makwasu, Lutela, Bilolo, Manzia, Muhanga and Ludjulu.
During 2008, Venmyn carried out an analysis on historical stream sediment sampling data from the Manguredjipa project. This analysis was graphically presented utilising Surfer® software to create a grade model of the Manguredjipa and surrounding environs. The Surfer® model of gold grade distribution for Manguredjipa showed a clear zone of anomalously high gold grades developed across the area trending in a southwest-northeast direction. The background gold grades range between 0.2 to 1.0g/m3and the anomalous areas reach a maximum of 4.2g/m3.
In August 2009, Loncor embarked on geochemical stream sediment, soil and rock sampling programs based on the combined results from the geophysical interpretation and the stream sediment grade distribution models. A one kilometre by two kilometre grid was designed initially for a target area, near the Durba adit, north of the base camp at Manguredjipa.
46
From 2010 until October 2011, the focus was on the Durba, Manguredjipa West and Muhanga prospects. Another prominent artisanal adit, named the Mont Blue Adit, was discovered within the Muhanga prospect. The following was carried out during this period:
2012 Exploration Activitiesat Manguredjipa
Exploration continued in the Manguredjipa area until early June 2012, when activities were suspended to conserve funds for the priority Ngayu project. Field work focused mainly on the Muhanga prospect. In order to better assess continuity of the mineralization, a channel sampling program at the Muhanga was completed in the first quarter of 2012. A total of 780 metres were sampled by means of a mechanical rock cutter, in two phases: (a) channels orientated N-S, i.e. normal to the lithological strike and long-axis of the rock chip anomaly, and (b) channels orientated E-W, normal to the dominant quartz vein direction. The rock sample results indicated that the mineralization is patchy and the potential to generate a significant mineral resource was low and did not warrant follow up drilling.
2013-2015 Exploration Activitiesat Manguredjipa
No exploration was undertaken on the North Kivu project by the Company since 2012 due to the force majeure situation in respect of the PRs and in order to focus exploration and funds on the priority Ngayu project.properties.
Exploration Plans for the North Kivu Project
Exploration on the North Kivu project will be dependent on the lifting of force majeure on the priority PRs so that groundwork can commence and on sufficient funding being available for exploration. The priority area would be Lutunguru prospect where extensive gold artisanal activity including hardrock mining is currently being undertaken.
Qualified Person
William R. Wilson, a directorPeter N. Cowley, President of the Company and a "qualified person" as such term is defined in subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K and in National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical information in this Form 20-F relating to the Company’sCompany's mineral projects.
43
Locality Map of the Imbo Project in Africa
44
Location of Imbo Project within the DRC
45
Locality Map of Imbo Project
46
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
47Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
See the management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 20152021 incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.1.
|
A. Operating Results
See the management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 20152021 incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.1.
|
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.
See the management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 20152021 incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.1.
|
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
The Company is a mineral exploration company and does not carry on any research and development activities.
|
D. Trend Information
None of the Company's assets are currently in production or generate revenue. However, the cyclical nature of the prices of metals, particularly the price of gold, is reasonably likely to have an effect on the Company's liquidity and capital resources. If the price of gold or the worldwide demand for gold decreases, there would likely be an adverse effect on the Company’sCompany's ability to raise additional funding and attract exploration partners for its projects. Recently,For a number of years, junior mineral exploration companies have experienced difficulties raising new money, and capital raising activities completed by such companies have often resulted in substantial dilution to existing shareholders.
|
TheAdditionally, any outbreaks of contagious diseases and other adverse public health developments in countries where the Company does notoperates could have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
|
The following information isa material and adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, the outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in significant restrictive measures being implemented by governments of various countries to control the spread of COVID-19. Such COVID-19 related restrictions and disruptions, including for employees, industry experts, personnel and suppliers across different industries, may negatively impact the Company's business operations and therefore the Company's operational results and financial condition. In addition, COVID-19 has resulted in a widespread health crisis that has adversely affected the economies and financial markets of many countries, resulting in an economic downturn that could affect the Company's ability to access or raise capital through issuances of the Company's securities as of December 31, 2015:and when needed for the Company's business operations.
47
48
|
Not applicable.Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
|
A. Directors and Senior Management
The directors and senior managementofficers of the Company and term of continuous service are as follows:
| Name | Position(s) with the Company | Served as a Director Since |
| Arnold T. Kondrat | August 24, 1993 | |
| John Barker | Chief Executive Officer | Not applicable |
| Peter N. Cowley | President and a director | |
| Donat K. Madilo | Chief Financial Officer | Not applicable |
| Fabrice Matheys | General Manager, DRC | Not applicable |
| Geoffrey G. Farr | Not applicable | |
| Zhengquan (Philip) Chen (1) (2) | Director | June 28, 2019 |
| Richard J. Lachcik | Director | June 29, 1998 |
| William R. Wilson | Director | July 15, 1997 |
| |
|
____________________
(1)Member of the audit committee of the board of directors of the Company.
(2)Member of the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company.
Arnold T. Kondrat - Mr. Kondrat is the Company's principal founder and has over 30 years of management experience in the resource exploration industry. During this time he has been ana senior officer and director of a number of publicly-traded resource exploration companies, in both Canada and the United States.States, including principal founder of several of these companies. In addition to his positions with Loncor, Mr. Kondrat is the principal founder, and Executive Vice President and a director, of Banro Corporation (a gold mining company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE MKT LLC with projects in the eastern DRC). He is also the principal founder,presently Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of Gentor Resources Inc. (a mineral exploration company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange), the principal founder, Chief Executive Officer and a director, of Delrand Resources Limited (a mineral exploration company listed on NEX (a separate board of the TSX Venture Exchange) and the JSE, and President of Sterling Portfolio Securities Inc. (a private venture capital firm based in Toronto). He was a senior officer of Banro Corporation (a gold mining company in the DRC) from 1994 to 2017.
John Barker - Mr. Barker has over 30 years of global mining experience encompassing many key elements of the mining world. His experience includes 15 years as a leading mining analyst, including with RBC DS heading up their Global Gold Mining initiative and focusing on African mining equities. Subsequently, he was Vice President Corporate Development for TSX-listed SouthernEra Resources, which was taken over by Lonmin, and was instrumental in the Guinor Gold sale to Crew Gold. More recently he has been involved in various copper, diamond and platinum initiatives in Southern Africa. During his career he has been involved in numerous asset sales and equity issues raising over US$600m in Canada, Australia, Europe and RSA.
Peter N. Cowley - Mr. Cowley is a geologist with over 40 years' experience in the minerals industry and a history of major exploration successes in Africa, including the DRC. Among his major accomplishments, Mr. Cowley was Chief Executive Officer and President of Banro Corporation from 2004 to 2008 where he led the exploration that delineated major gold resources at Twangiza and Namoya in the DRC. Prior to joining Banro, Mr. Cowley was Managing Director of Ashanti Exploration, where he led the exploration team in the discovery and development of the Geita mine in Tanzania. Prior to Ashanti, he was Technical Director of Cluff Resources which discovered and developed mines in Zimbabwe, Ghana and Tanzania. He holds an M.Sc from the Royal School of Mines, an MBA from the Strathclyde Business School and is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Loncor from 2009 to 2015 (he re-joined Loncor as President in October 2019).
48
Donat K. Madilo –- Mr. Madilo has over 2630 years of experience in accounting, administration and finance in the DRC and North America. He isheld senior officer positions with Banro Corporation (a gold mining company in the DRC) from 1996 to 2018 (including Senior Vice President, Commercial & DRC Affairs of Banro Corporation (and was previouslyand Chief Financial Officer). In addition to being Chief Financial Officer of Banro Corporation),Loncor, he is also presently Chief Financial Officer of Gentor Resources Inc. and Treasurer of Delrand Resources Limited. Mr. Madilo’sMadilo's previous experience includes director of finance of Coocec-ceaz (a credit union chain in the DRC) and senior advisor at Conseil Permanent de la Comptabilité au Congo, the accounting regulation board in the DRC. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) degree from Institut Supérieur de Commerce de Kinshasa, a B.Sc. (Licence) in Applied Economics from University of Kinshasa and a Masters of Science in Accounting (Honours) from Roosevelt University in Chicago.
49
Fabrice Matheys –- Mr. Matheys is a professional geologist with more than 2329 years of experience in Africa. Prior to his role with Loncor, Mr. Matheys served as Exploration Geologist for De Beers in Botswana, West Africa and South Africa and spent eight years as Exploration Manager in the Democratic Republic of the CongoDRC with exploration programs focused on gold, diamonds, niobium and tungsten.
Geoffrey G. Farr –- Mr. Farr has been a partner of the law firm Dickinson Wright LLP (which acts as legal counsel to Loncor) from July 2019 to present. He practices corporate and securities law. From February 2011 to present,June 2019, Mr. Farr has been Vice President, General Counsel of Banro Corporation, andwas General Counsel to each of Loncor, Gentor Resources Inc. and Delrand Resources Limited. He is also currently Corporate Secretary of each of Banro CorporationLoncor and Gentor Resources Inc., (he remains Corporate Secretary of each). From February 2011 to October 2018, Mr. Farr was Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Banro Corporation, and a directorfrom June 2017 to January 2019, he was General Counsel to and Corporate Secretary of Delrand Resources Limited.Kuuhubb Inc. (a company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange focused on lifestyle and mobile video game applications). Prior to February 2011, Mr. Farr practised corporate and securities law in Toronto for 17 years, which included extensive experience in representing public companies. He holds a LL.B. from the University of Ottawa and a B.Comm. from Queen’sQueen's University.
Maurice J. ColsonZhengquan (Philip) Chen –- Mr. Colson has workedChen is Managing Partner and Co-Founder of Dynaco Capital Inc., a financial advisory firm based in theToronto and associated with numerous North American and Asian venture capital and private equity funds and multi-billion dollar Chinese conglomerates. He works on transactions between Chinese firms and North American companies. Prior to founding Dynaco Capital Inc. in September 2007, Mr. Chen was a senior associate of an international private investment industry for more than 38 years andbank, from February 1998 to June 2006, where he was for many years managing director for a major Canadian investment dealer in the United Kingdom. He is activelydirectly involved in providing strategic counseldozens of listings of Chinese companies on the TSX Venture Exchange and assistance with financing to emerging private and public companies in Canada and to Canadian companies operating in China, Africa and South America. He is a director, and a member of the audit committee, of several TorontoFrankfurt Stock Exchange and TSX Venture Exchange listed companies,numerous financial advisory assignments in a variety of sectors. Prior to that he served as Executive Vice President of a subsidiary of a Chinese conglomerate in New York from March 1996 to July 1997. Mr. Chen gained his BSc and is the former PresidentLLM degrees in China and Chief Executive Officer of the TSX Venture-listed company, Lithium One Resources. Mr. Colson holds a Masters of Business Administrationan EMBA degree from McGillthe University in Montreal.of Hawaii.
Richard J. Lachcik - Prior to his retirement in 2017, Mr. Lachcik is a partner of the law firm Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, which acts as counsel to the Company. He has been practisingpracticed corporate and securities law in Toronto, Canada for over 30 years. Mr. Lachcik hasHis practice included extensive experience in representing public companies, and has also actedas well as acting for a number of investment dealers. He has been an officer and director of a number of Canadian public resource companies.
49
William R. Wilson –- Mr. Wilson is Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ARNEVUT Resources,TUVERA Exploration Inc., TUVERA is a private precious metalsholding company for the ARVENUT exploration company based in Colorado with properties in Nevada, Utah and Utah.New Mexico. He has created and managed 11 mining companies over 25 years with properties in the U.S., Canada, Russia, the DRC and Ukraine. Mr. Wilson is a memberQualified Professional in Mining, Metallurgy/Processing and Environmental Compliance (Member no. 01063QP) of the Mining and Metallurgical Society of America, the Canadian Institute of Mining and the Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.America. He has a degree in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and a Masters of Business Administration degree from the University of Southern California. Mr. Wilson has been involved in the mining industry for 36more than 40 years. He has been a director and senior officer of a number of public companies in both Canada and the United States, and has been a member of the audit committee of several of these companies.
There are no family relationships among any of the Company's directors or senior management.
There is no arrangement or understanding with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or officer of the Company.
The following directors of the Company are presently directors of other issuers that are public companies:
50
| Name of Director | Names of Other Issuers | |
| Arnold T. Kondrat | ||
| Fandom Sports Media Corp. Kontrol Technologies Corp. | ||
| Deltic Energy plc | ||
| Gentor Resources Inc. | ||
| William R. Wilson | ||
| Gentor Resources Inc. | ||
Other than the board of directors, the Company does not have an administrative, supervisory or management body.
|
B. Compensation
Named Officers
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation paid to the officers of the Company set out in the following table (the "NEOs") for the financial year ended December 31, 2015.2021.
| Name and Principal | Year | Salary | Share-based | Option-based | Non-equity | All other | Total |
| Position | (US$) | awards | awards(3) | incentive plan | Compensation | Compensation | |
| (US$) | (US$) | compensation - | (US$) | (US$) | |||
| Annual Incentive | |||||||
| Plan | |||||||
| (US$) | |||||||
| Arnold T. Kondrat(1) | 2015 | $93,840(2) | N/A | N/A | Nil | $19,128(4) | $112,968 |
| Chief Executive | |||||||
| Officer and President | |||||||
| Peter N. Cowley(1) | 2015 | Nil | N/A | N/A | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| Chief Executive | |||||||
| Officer and President | |||||||
| Donat K. Madilo | 2015 | Nil | N/A | N/A | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| Chief Financial | |||||||
| Officer | |||||||
| Fabrice Matheys | 2015 | $15,000 | N/A | N/A | Nil | $9,800(5) | $24,800 |
| General Manager, | |||||||
| DRC | |||||||
| Geoffrey G. Farr | 2015 | $48,000 | N/A | N/A | Nil | $4,000(5) | $52,000 |
| General Counsel and | |||||||
| Corporate Secretary |
50
51
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary (US$) | Share-based awards (US$) | Option-based awards (2) (US$) | Non-equity incentive plan compensation - Annual Incentive Plan (US$) | All other Compensation (US$) | Total Compensation (US$) |
| Arnold T. Kondrat Executive Chairman of the Board (1) | 2021 | $250,000 | N/A | $198,450 | $250,000 | $8,476 (3) | $706,926 |
| John Barker Chief Executive Officer (4) | 2021 | $157,605 (5) | N/A | $326,389 | N/A | Nil | $483,994 |
| Donat K. Madilo Chief Financial Officer | 2021 | $166,667 | N/A | $119,070 | N/A | $11,071 (3) | $296,808 |
| Peter N. Cowley President | 2021 | $150,000 | N/A | $198,450 | N/A | Nil | $348,450 |
| Fabrice Matheys General Manager, DRC | 2021 | $135,000 | N/A | $122,206 | N/A | $43,504 (6) | $300,710 |
Loncor employees are entitled______________________________________
(1)Mr. Kondrat was appointed Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company in September 2021. Prior to receive a retention allowance (the "Retention Allowance")this appointment, he served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
(2)These amounts represent the grant date fair value of the stock options awarded in 2021 to the NEOs, calculated in Canadian dollars and then converted to U.S. dollars using an average exchange rate for 2021 of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7980. There were two stock option grants in 2021 to the NEOs - on terminationMarch 15 and September 29. Grant date fair value of their employmentthe stock options granted on March 15, 2021 to the NEOs was calculated in accordance with the Company, providedBlack-Scholes model using the employee has beenprice of the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.65 per share, with the Company for a minimumkey valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of two years82.68%, risk free interest rate of 0.49%, no dividend yield and provided that termination is not due to misconduct (in the caseexpected life of misconduct, the Retention Allowance is forfeited). The amount3 years. Grant date fair value of the Retention Allowance is equalstock options granted on September 29, 2021 to the employee's monthly base salary multipliedNEOs was calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model using the price of the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.70 per share, with the key valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of 82.38%, risk free interest rate of 0.67%, no dividend yield and expected life of 3 years.
(3)This amount represents medical and life insurance premiums paid by the numberCompany.
(4)Mr. Barker was appointed Chief Executive Officer of years the employee was with the Company (upin September 2021. Prior to this appointment, he served as Vice President of Business Development of the Company.
(5)The salary for Mr. Barker was paid in Canadian dollars. The U.S. dollar amount set out in the above table for such salary was calculated using an average exchange rate for 2021 of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7980.
(6)This amount represents medical and life insurance premiums paid by the Company totaling US$3,504 and a maximum of 10 years), with any partial year being recognized on a pro rata basis.US$40,000 bonus paid by the Company to Mr. Matheys.
Incentive Plan Awards
The following table provides details regarding outstanding option and share-based awards held by the NEOs as at December 31, 2015:2021:
51
| |
|
52
| |
|
| Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards | |||||||
| Option-based Awards | Share-based Awards | ||||||
| Name | Option grant date | Number of securities underlying unexercised options (1) (#) | Option exercise price (2) ($) | Option expiration date | Aggregate value of unexercised in-the-money options (3) (US$) | Number of shares or units that have not vested (#) | Market or payout value of share- based awards that have not vested (US$) |
| Arnold T. Kondrat | Sept. 29, 2021 | 250,000 | Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) | Sept. 29, 2026 | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| Mar. 15, 2021 | 250,000 | Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) | Mar. 15, 2026 | $2,500 | |||
| Dec. 6, 2019 | 500,000 | Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) | Dec. 6, 2024 | $100,000 | |||
| June 24, 2019 | 250,000 | Cdn$0.18 (US$0.14) | June 24, 2024 | $95,000 | |||
| Mar. 14, 2019 | 125,000 | Cdn$0.14 (US$0.11) | Mar. 14, 2024 | $51,250 | |||
| John Barker | Sept. 29, 2021 | 600,000 | Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) | Sept. 29, 2026 | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| Mar. 15, 2021 | 250,000 | Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) | Mar. 15, 2026 | $2,500 | |||
| Sept. 15, 2020 | 100,000 | Cdn$0.60 (US$0.47) | Sept. 15, 2025 | $5,000 | |||
| April 19, 2020 | 250,000 | Cdn$0.45 (US$0.36) | April 19, 2025 | $40,000 | |||
| Donat K. Madilo | Sept. 29, 2021 | 150,000 | Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) | Sept. 29, 2026 | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| Mar. 15, 2021 | 150,000 | Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) | Mar. 15, 2026 | $1,500 | |||
| Dec. 6, 2019 | 150,000 | Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) | Dec. 6, 2024 | $30,000 | |||
| June 24, 2019 | 125,000 | Cdn$0.18 (US$0.14) | June 24, 2024 | $47,500 | |||
| Mar. 14, 2019 | 125,000 | Cdn$0.14 (US$0.11) | Mar. 14, 2024 | $51,250 | |||
| Peter N. Cowley | Sept. 29, 2021 | 250,000 | Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) | Sept. 29, 2026 | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| Mar. 15, 2021 | 250,000 | Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) | Mar. 15, 2026 | $2,500 | |||
| Dec. 6, 2019 | 500,000 | Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) | Dec. 6, 2024 | $100,000 | |||
| Fabrice Matheys | Sept. 29, 2021 | 100,000 | Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) | Sept. 29, 2026 | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| Mar. 15, 2021 | 200,000 | Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) | Mar. 15, 2026 | $2,000 | |||
| Dec. 6, 2019 | 200,000 | Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) | Dec. 6, 2024 | $40,000 | |||
All______________________________
(1)The stock options granted on March 14, 2019, April 19, 2020 and September 15, 2020 vest (or vested as applicable) as follows: 1/4 of the stock options shown ingranted to each optionee vest (or vested as applicable) on each of the above table with an expiration date6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of either January 28, 2016 or January 11, 2016,the grant date. The stock options granted on June 24, 2019, December 6, 2019, March 15, 2021 and September 29, 2021 vested as applicable, expiredfollows: 100% of the stock options granted to each optionee vested on the expiration date without being exercised. On March 11, 2016,4 month anniversary of the Board granted 500,000 new stock options to each of Mr. Kondrat, Mr. Madilo and Mr. Farr, with each such option having angrant date.
(2)The exercise price of Cdn$0.06 per share and an expiration dateeach of March 11, 2021.
The following table provides details regarding outstanding option-based awards, share-based awards and non-equity incentive plan compensationthe stock options held by the NEOs which vested and/oris in Canadian dollars. The U.S. dollar figures set out in this column of the table were earned duringcalculated using the year endedexchange rate on December 31, 2015:2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7888.
(3)This is based on (a) the closing sale price per share of the Company's common shares on December 31, 2021 of Cdn$0.66 as reported by the Toronto Stock Exchange, and (b) converting that price into a price of US$0.52 using the exchange rate on December 31, 2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7888.
|
Non-Executive Directors
TheDirector compensation is designed to achieve the following goals: (a) compensation should attract and retain the most qualified people to serve on the board of directors of the Company were not paid any fees(the "Board"); (b) compensation should align directors' interests with the long-term interests of shareholders; (c) compensation should fairly pay directors for risks and responsibilities related to being a director of an entity of the Company's size and scope: and (d) the structure of the compensation should be simple, transparent and easy for shareholders to understand.
The amounts earned by the non-executive directors of the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2015 for their services2021 are set out in their capacity as directors. The Company'sthe table below under "Director Summary Compensation Table".
Non-executive directors are entitled to receive stock option grants under the Company's Stock Option Plan, as recommended by the Board's compensation committee and determined by the board of directors of the Company (the "Board").Board. The exercise price of such stock options is determined by the Board, but shall in no event be less than the last closing price of the Company’sCompany's common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange prior to the date the stock options are granted. No stock options were granted bySee the disclosure below under "Incentive Stock Option Plan" for a summary of the terms of the Company's Stock Option Plan.
Non-executive directors of the Company are also reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in 2015.attending Board or committee meetings and otherwise incurred in carrying out their duties as directors of the Company.
DuringExecutive directors of the financialCompany are compensated as employees of the Company and are not entitled to additional compensation for performance of director duties. Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley are executive directors of the Company.
53
Director Summary Compensation Table
The following compensation table sets out the compensation paid to each of the Company's directors in the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, other than Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley. See "Summary Compensation Table" above for details regarding the compensation paid to each of Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley as an executive of the Company incurred legal expenses (and related costs)in respect of Cdn$33,126 (or US$25,904 based onservices rendered during 2021.
| Name | Fees earned (US$) | Share-based awards (US$) | Option-based awards (1) (US$) | Non-equity incentive plan compensation (US$) | All other Compensation (US$) | Total (US$) |
| Zhengquan (Philip) Chen | $24,000 | N/A | $59,535 | N/A | N/A | $83,535 |
| Richard J. Lachcik | $24,000 | N/A | $59,535 | N/A | N/A | $83,535 |
| William R. Wilson | $24,000 | N/A | $59,535 | N/A | N/A | $83,535 |
________________________________
(1)These amounts represent the grant date fair value of the stock options awarded in 2021 to the directors set out in the above table, calculated in Canadian dollars and then converted to U.S. dollars using an average exchange rate for 20152021 of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7820)0.7980. There were two stock option grants in 2021 to Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP. Richard J. Lachcik, a directorthe said directors - on March 15 and September 29. Grant date fair value of the Company, is a partnerstock options granted on March 15, 2021 was calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model using the price of Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP.the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.65 per share, with the key valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of 82.68%, risk free interest rate of 0.49%, no dividend yield and expected life of 3 years. Grant date fair value of the stock options granted on September 29, 2021 was calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model using the price of the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.70 per share, with the key valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of 82.38%, risk free interest rate of 0.67%, no dividend yield and expected life of 3 years.
53
All directors receive reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to their attendance at meetings or other expenses incurred for Company purposes.
Incentive Plan Awards
The following table provides details regarding the outstanding option and share based awards held as at December 31, 20152021 by the directors of the Company other than Mr. Kondrat.Kondrat and Mr. Cowley. See "Named Officers - Incentive Plan Awards" above for details regarding the outstanding stock options held by Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley as at December 31, 2015.2021.
| Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards | |||||||
| Option-based Awards | Share-based Awards | ||||||
| Name | Option grant date | Number of securities underlying unexercised options (1) (#) | Option exercise price (2) ($) | Option expiration date | Aggregate value of unexercised in-the-money options (3) (US$) | Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested (#) | Market or payout value of share- based awards that have not vested (US$) |
| Zhengquan (Philip) Chen | Sept. 29, 2021 | 75,000 | Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) | Sept. 29, 2026 | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| Mar. 15, 2021 | 75,000 | Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) | Mar. 15, 2026 | $750 | |||
| Dec. 6, 2019 | 100,000 | Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) | Dec. 6, 2024 | $21,000 | |||
| July 2, 2019 | 75,000 | Cdn$0.18 (US0.14) | July 2, 2024 | $28,500 | |||
| Richard J. Lachcik | Sept. 29, 2021 | 75,000 | Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) | Sept. 29, 2026 | Nil | N/A | N/A |
54
All of the stock options shown ingranted to each optionee vest (or vested as applicable) on each of the above table with an expiration date6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of January 28, 2016 expired on this expiration date without being exercised. On March 11, 2016, the Board granted 300,000 newgrant date. The stock options granted on June 24, 2019, December 6, 2019, March 15, 2021 and September 29, 2021 vested as follows: 100% of the stock options granted to each optionee vested on the 4 month anniversary of Mr. Colson, Mr. Lachcik and Mr. Wilson, with each such option having anthe grant date.
(2)The exercise price of each of the stock options held by the NEOs is in Canadian dollars. The U.S. dollar figures set out in this column of the table were calculated using the exchange rate on December 31, 2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$0.061.00 = US$0.7888.
(3)This is based on (a) the closing sale price per share and an expiration date of March 11, 2021.
The following table provides details regarding outstanding option-based awards, share-based awards and non-equity incentive plan compensation in respect of the directors of the Company other than Mr. Kondrat, which vested and/or were earned during the year endedCompany's common shares on December 31, 2015.See "Named Officers - Incentive Plan Awards" above for details regarding2021 of Cdn$0.66 as reported by the outstanding option-based awards, share-based awardsToronto Stock Exchange, and non-equity incentive plan compensation in respect(b) converting that price into a price of Mr. Kondrat, which vested and/or were earned duringUS$0.52 using the year endedexchange rate on December 31, 2015.2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7888.
5455
| |||
|
Other Information
Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries provides pension, retirement or similar benefits.
|
C. Board Practices
Each director of the Company holds office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company following his election or appointment, unless his office is earlier vacated in accordance with the by-lawby-laws of the Company. See Item 6.A. of this Form 20-F for the dates the directors of the Company were first elected or appointed to the Company's boardBoard.
Executives' Employment Contracts
The Company and Arnold T. Kondrat have entered into an employment contract (the "Executive Chairman Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Kondrat performs the services of directors.
Employment Contracts with Executive Officers – Termination Benefits
ThereChairman of the Board of the Company. Mr. Kondrat's annual salary under the Executive Chairman Agreement is no contract, agreement, plan or arrangementUS$250,000. The term of the Executive Chairman Agreement continues until December 31, 2024, provided that providesthe Company may terminate the Executive Chairman Agreement at any time for paymentsjust cause upon written notice to an executive officerMr. Kondrat. The Executive Chairman Agreement includes a "change of control bonus", pursuant to which, upon the occurrence of a "change of control" (as defined in the Executive Chairman Agreement) of the Company where the Company's "market capitalization" (as defined in the Executive Chairman Agreement) exceeds Cdn$75,000,000, the Company shall pay to Mr. Kondrat a Cdn$5,000,000 cash bonus.
The Company and John Barker have entered into an employment contract (the "CEO Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Barker performs the services of Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Barker's annual salary under the CEO Agreement is Cdn$250,000. The term of the CEO Agreement continues until September 21, 2023, provided that the Company may terminate the CEO Agreement at following orany time for just cause upon written notice to Mr. Barker.
The Company and Donat K. Madilo have entered into an employment contract (the "CFO Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Madilo performs the services of Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Madilo's annual salary under the Madilo Agreement is US$175,000. The Company may terminate the CFO Agreement at any time for just cause upon written notice to Mr. Madilo.
The Company and Peter N. Cowley have entered into an employment contract (the "President Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Cowley performs the services of President of the Company. Mr. Cowley's annual salary under the President Agreement is US$175,000. The term of the President Agreement continues until May 1, 2025, provided that the Company may terminate the President Agreement at any time for just cause upon written notice to Mr. Cowley.
56
Each of the CEO Agreement, CFO Agreement and President Agreement also provides as follows: (a) in connection with any termination (whether voluntary, involuntary or constructive), resignation, retirement,the event of a change"change of control" (as such term is defined in controleach employment agreement) of the Company or a change in an executive officer's responsibilities, other than the Retention Allowance discussed above. However, the Board may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of currently outstanding stock options granted under the Company’s Stock Option Plan in the event a take-over bid is made for the common shares"constructive dismissal" of the Company, any change of controlemployee (as such term is defined in each employment agreement) of the Company occurs or any other transaction involvingemployee, the employee has the right to terminate his employment agreement and is entitled to be paid by the Company occursan amount (the "Retiring Allowance") equal to the sum of (i) three times his annual salary and (ii) three times the "Bonus Amount" (see "Named Officers - Incentive Plan Awards" under Item 6.B.below for definition of this Form 20-F with respect"Bonus Amount"); (b) if immediately prior to such termination the employee holds stock options of the Company, heldhe shall be entitled to exercise all such stock options (vested and unvested) at any time during the period of time commencing upon such termination and ending on the natural expiry date of such stock options; and (c) in the event the Company terminates the employment agreement without cause, the employee is entitled to the stock option exercise rights described above in item (b) and to be paid by the executive officersCompany the Retiring Allowance.
"Bonus Amount" is defined to mean an amount equal to one-half of the Company; see also "Incentive Stock Option Plan" under Item 6.E.aggregate amount of this Form 20-F regardingall bonuses paid or payable to the termsemployee by the Company and its subsidiaries in respect of the Company’s Stock Option Plan).two most recent fiscal years of the Company.
Audit Committee
The Board has an audit committee (the "Audit Committee"), the members of which are Maurice J. Colson,Zhengquan (Philip) Chen, Richard J. Lachcik and William R. Wilson. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of Canadian National Instrument 52-110 - Audit Committees ("NI 52-110") and Section 803A of the NYSE MKTAmerican Company Guide. Each member of the Audit Committee is also "financially literate" within the meaning of NI 52-110. At no time since the commencement of the Company's financial year ended December 31, 20152021 was a recommendation of the Audit Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor not adopted by the Board. The Audit Committee's charter is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 1.3.
55
Compensation Committee
The Board has a compensation committee, the members of which are Maurice J. Colson,Zhengquan (Philip) Chen, Richard J. Lachcik and William R. Wilson. See the discussion above under "Audit Committee" with respect to the independence of the members of the compensation committee. The primary function of the compensation committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (a) human resources policies; and (b) executive compensation. To carry out its oversight responsibilities, the compensation committee's duties include the following:
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
|
1.review and recommend for approval to the Board, the Company's key human resources policies;
2.review and recommend for approval to the Board the compensation and benefits policy and plans (including incentive compensation plans) for the Company;
3.review and recommend to the Board the employment agreements of the Company's executive officers;
4.evaluate annually the performance of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and recommend to the Board his annual compensation package and performance objectives;
57
5.review annually and recommend to the Board the annual compensation package and performance objectives of the other executive officers of the Company;
6.review annually and recommend to the Board the annual salaries (or percentage change in salaries) for the Company's non-executive staff;
7.review annually and recommend to the Board the adequacy and form of the compensation of the Company's directors and be satisfied the compensation realistically reflects the responsibilities and risk involved in being such a director;
8.review annually and recommend for approval to the Board the executive compensation disclosure of the Company in its information circular, and be satisfied that the overall compensation philosophy and policy for senior officers is adequately disclosed and describes in sufficient detail the rationale for salary levels, incentive payments, share options and all other components of executive compensation as prescribed by applicable securities laws;
9.determine grants of options to purchase shares of the Company under the Company's Stock Option Plan and recommend same to the Board for approval;
10.engage, at the Company's expense, any external professional or other advisors which it determines necessary in order to carry out its duties hereunder; and
11.perform any other activities consistent with this mandate as the compensation committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate.
Retention Allowance
Loncor previously had a policy which provided that employees were entitled to receive a retention allowance (the "Retention Allowance") on termination of their employment with the Company, provided the employee had been with the Company for a minimum of two years and provided that termination was not due to misconduct (in the case of misconduct, the Retention Allowance was forfeited). The amount of the Retention Allowance was equal to the employee's monthly base salary multiplied by the number of years the employee was with the Company (up to a maximum of 10 years), with any partial year being recognized on a pro rata basis. While the Retention Allowance policy was discontinued by Loncor effective December 31, 2017, the Retention Allowance amounts accrued for the NEOs up to December 31, 2017 remain recorded as a liability in Loncor's financial statements.
D. Employees
The following sets out the number of employees which the Company and its subsidiaries had as at December 31, 2015,2021, December 31, 20142020 and December 31, 2013,2019, providing a breakdown of these employees by location:location/project:
5658
| Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | |
| Location | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
| Loncor office in Toronto, Canada | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Loncor office in Beni, DRC | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Loncor office in Kinshasa, DRC | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Ngayu project | - | 11 | 23 |
| North Kivu project | - | - | - |
| Totals: | 8 | 22 | 40 |
| Location/Project | Dec. 31, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 | Dec. 31, 2019 |
| Loncor office, Toronto, Canada | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Loncor office in Beni, DRC | 3 | 3 | - |
| Ngayu projects | - | - | 1 |
| Imbo Project camp | 21 | 38 | 4 |
| Totals: | 29 | 45 | 8 |
________________________________
(1)The Imbo Project was acquired by the Company in September 2019 (see "Information on the Company - History and Development of the Company" in Item 4A of this Form 20-F). The significant increase in employees at the Imbo Project camp during 2020 was a result of the commencement by the Company of an exploration program at the Imbo Project following its acquisition.
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has any unionized employees.
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries employ a significant number of temporary employees.
|
E. Share Ownership
The following table sets out the number of common shares of the Company held by the Company's directors and officers as of March 15, 2016April 20, 2022 (including the percentage of the Company's outstanding common shares represented by such shares). See Item 6.B. of this Form 20-F for information regarding the stock options of the Company held by the Company's directors and officers as of March 15, 2016.December 31, 2021.
| Percentage of | ||||||||
| Number of Common | Outstanding | |||||||
| Name | Shares Owned | Common Shares | Number of Common Shares Owned | Percentage of Outstanding Common Shares | ||||
| Maurice J. Colson | Nil | Nil | ||||||
| John Barker | 325,500 | 0.23% | ||||||
| Zhengquan (Philip) Chen | 29,800 | 0.02% | ||||||
| Peter N. Cowley | 110,000 | 0.08% | ||||||
| Geoffrey G. Farr | 105,000 | 0.07% | 302,500 | 0.22% | ||||
| Arnold T. Kondrat | 74,300,818 | 49.1% | 29,683,909 (1) | 21.08% | ||||
| Richard J. Lachcik | 11,666 | 0.01% | 155,833 | 0.11% | ||||
| Donat K. Madilo | 100,000 | 0.07% | 420,000 | 0.30% | ||||
| Fabrice Matheys | Nil | Nil | nil | - | ||||
| William R. Wilson | 3,333 | 0.002% | 151,667 | 0.11% | ||||
59
Incentive Stock Option Plan
The Company has a Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), the principal purposes of which are: (A) to retain and attract qualified directors, officers, employees and consultants which the Company and its subsidiaries require; (B) to promote a proprietary interest in the Company and its subsidiaries; (C) to provide an incentive element in compensation; and (D) to promote the development of the Company and its subsidiaries. The following summarizes the terms of the Plan:
57(a)Stock options may be granted from time to time by the Board to such directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, and in such numbers, as are determined by the Board at the time of the granting of the stock options.
(b)The total number of common shares of the Company issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding stock options granted under the Plan shall not at any time exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding common shares of the Company, from time to time (as at the date of this Form 20-F, there are outstanding under the Plan 10,646,000 stock options entitling the holders to purchase an aggregate of 10,646,000 common shares of the Company (which is equal to 7.56% of the number of common shares of the Company which are outstanding as at the date of this Form 20-F), such that the number of new stock options currently available for future grants under the Plan is stock options to purchase an aggregate of 3,436,417 common shares of the Company (which is equal to 2.44% of the number of common shares of the Company which are outstanding as at the date of this Form 20-F).
(c)The exercise price of each stock option shall be determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of the granting of the stock option, provided that the exercise price shall not be lower than the "Market Price". "Market Price" means the last closing price of the common shares of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange prior to the date the stock option is granted.
(d)The total number of common shares of the Company issued to "insiders" (as such term is defined in Part 1 of the TSX Company Manual) of the Company, within any one year period, under all "security based compensation arrangements" (within the meaning of the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange) of the Company shall not exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding common shares of the Company.
(e)The total number of common shares of the Company issuable to "insiders" (as such term is defined in Part 1 of the TSX Company Manual) of the Company, at any time, under all "security based compensation arrangements" (within the meaning of the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange) of the Company shall not exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding common shares of the Company.
(f)All stock options shall be for a term determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of the granting of the stock options, provided that no stock option shall have a term exceeding five years and, unless the Board at any time makes a specific determination otherwise (but subject to the terms of the Plan), a stock option and all rights to purchase common shares of the Company pursuant thereto shall expire and terminate immediately upon the optionee who holds such stock option ceasing to be at least one of a director, officer or employee of or consultant to the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, as the case may be.
(g)Unless otherwise determined by the Board at the time of the granting of the stock options, one-quarter of the stock options granted to an optionee vest on each of the 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of the grant date.
60
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
58(h)Except in limited circumstances in the case of the death of an optionee, stock options shall not be assignable or transferable.
| |
| |
|
(i)Disinterested shareholder approval is required prior to any reduction in the exercise price of a stock option if the optionee holding such stock option is an insider of the Company.
(j)The Company may amend from time to time the terms and conditions of the Plan by resolution of the Board. Any amendments shall be subject to the prior consent of any applicable regulatory bodies, including the Toronto Stock Exchange (to the extent such consent is required).
(k)The Board has full and final discretion to interpret the provisions of the Plan, and all decisions and interpretations made by the Board shall be binding and conclusive upon the Company and all optionees, subject to shareholder approval if required by the Toronto Stock Exchange.
(l)The Plan does not provide for financial assistance by the Company to an optionee in connection with an option exercise.
The Board may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of currently outstanding stock options granted under the Plan in the event a take-over bid is made for the common shares of the Company, any change of control of the Company occurs or any other transaction involving the Company occurs.
A copy of the Plan is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 4.1.
|
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. Major Shareholders
To the knowledge of management of the Company, based on a review of publicly available filings as at March 21, 2016,April 20, 2022, the following are the only persons or companies who beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding common shares of the Company:
| Name of Shareholder | Number of Common Shares Owned | Percentage of Outstanding Common Shares (1) |
| Arnold T. Kondrat (2) | 29,683,909 | 21.08% |
| Resolute Canada 2 Pty Ltd (3) | 31,450,000 | 22.33% |
| Newmont Canada FN Holdings ULC (4) | 7,275,000 | 5.17% |
_________________________________
(1)The information in this column of the table is based on the number of common shares of the Company outstanding as at April 20, 2022.
(2)Mr. Kondrat is Executive Chairman of the Board and a director of the Company. As at March 21, 2018, Mr. Kondrat held 37,150,409 (or 46.82%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company. See Item 4A. of this Form 20-F ("History and Development of the Company") with respect to (a) the share sale transaction with Resolute pursuant to which Mr. Kondrat sold 12,500,000 common shares of the Company in June 2018, and (b) the private placement transaction pursuant to which Mr. Kondrat acquired 350,000 common shares of the Company in June 2018. Immediately following these transactions, Mr. Kondrat held 25,000,409 (or 26.68%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company. During 2019, 2020 and 2021, Mr. Kondrat acquired, in total, an additional 4,683,500 common shares, such that he currently holds (as at April 20 2022) 29,683,909 (or 21.08%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company.
| Number of Common | Percentage of Outstanding | |||||
| Name of Shareholder | Shares Owned | Common Shares(1) | ||||
| Arnold T. Kondrat(2) | 74,300,818 | 49.1% | ||||
| Newmont Canada FN Holdings ULC(3) | 14,550,000 | 9.61% |
| |
| |
|
61
(3)See Item 4A of this Form 20-F ("History and Development of the Company") which sets out the transactions pursuant to which Resolute Canada 2 Pty Ltd ("Resolute") acquired in 2018 25,500,000 common shares of the Company. Immediately following these transactions, these 25,500,000 common shares represented 27.22% of the outstanding common shares of the Company. In 2020 and 2021, Resolute acquired, in total, an additional 5,950,000 common shares of the Company, such that Resolute currently holds (as at April 20 2022) 31,450,000 (or 22.33%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company.
(4)See Item 4A of this Form 20-F ("History and Development of the Company") which sets out the transactions pursuant to which Newmont Canada FN Holdings ULC acquired the common shares of the Company currently held by it as reflected in the above table.
None of the shareholders disclosed above have any voting rights with respect to their respective common shares of the Company that are different from any other holder of common shares of the Company.
As of March 21, 2016,April 20, 2022, based on the Company’s shareholders’Company's shareholders' register, there were 8491 shareholders of record of the Company’sCompany's common shares in the United States, holding 8.94%5.98% of the outstanding common shares of the Company.
59
Control by Foreign Government or Other Persons
To the best of the knowledge of management of the Company, the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, any foreign government, or any other natural or legal person, severally or jointly.
Change of Control
As of the date of this Form 20-F, there are no arrangements known to the Company which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.
|
InB. Related Party Transactions
On February 2015,25, 2020, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement 6,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$2,400,000. Arnold T. Kondrat ("Kondrat"), who is Executive Chairman (but was Chief Executive Officer at the time of the transaction) and a director of the Company, purchased 1,440,000 of such shares, Resolute Canada 2 Pty Ltd ("Resolute"), which holds more than 10% of the outstanding common shares of the Company, purchased 300,000 of such shares, and Donat K. Madilo ("Madilo"), who is Chief Financial Officer of the Company, purchased 50,000 of such shares.
On July 31, 2020, the Company closed a first tranche of a private placement financing for 8,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.06 per share for gross proceeds to the Company of Cdn$480,000. Arnold T. Kondrat purchased 3,500,000 of the shares issued under this placement. In March 2015, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 3,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.06 per share for gross proceeds to the Company of Cdn$180,000. Mr. Kondrat purchased 500,000 of the shares issued under this placement. In February 2016, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 67,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.0150.50 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$1,005,000. Mr.4,000,000. Kondrat purchased 60,000,000270,000 of thesuch shares, issued under this private placement. Mr. KondratResolute purchased 3,000,000 of such shares, Madilo purchased 70,000 of such shares, and Peter N. Cowley, who is President Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company, purchased 50,000 of such shares.
On February 3, 2021, the Company closed a first tranche of a private placement financing for 8,000,000 units of the Company (the "Units") at a price of Cdn$0.50 per Unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$4,000,000. Each Unit consisted of one common share of the Company and taking into account the shares acquired under the said placements, now holds 74,300,818 (or 49.1%one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "Warrant") of the outstandingCompany, with each Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common sharesshare of the Company. As well,Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a portionperiod of 12 months following the closing date of the proceeds fromissuance of the said February 2016 private placement were usedUnits. Kondrat purchased 200,000 of the Units and Resolute purchased 1,200,000 of the Units.
62
Reference is also made to repay short term, non-interest bearing loans totaling Cdn$825,000 providedNote 7 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company by Mr. Kondrat.filed as part of this annual report under Item 18, for additional information regarding related party transactions.
|
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
Item 8. Financial Information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of the Company are filed as part of this annual report under Item 18.
Legal or Arbitration Proceedings
The Company is not aware of any current or pending material legal or arbitration proceeding to which it is or is likely to be a party or of which any of its properties are or are likely to be the subject.
The Company is not aware of any material proceeding in which any director, member of senior management or affiliate of the Company is either a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
60
Dividend Policy
The Company has not paid any dividend or made any other distribution in respect of its outstanding shares and management does not anticipate that the Company will pay dividends or make any other distribution in respect on its shares in the foreseeable future. The Company's Board, from time to time, and on the basis of any earnings and the Company's financial requirements or any other relevant factor, will determine the future dividend or distribution policy of the Company with respect to its shares.
|
B. Significant Changes
There have been no significant changes in the affairs of the Company since the date of the audited annual consolidated financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, other than as discussed in this Form 20-F.
|
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
A. Offer and Listing Details
The Company's common shares (a) are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") under the symbol "LN", and (b) are quoted on the OTC PinkOTCQX tier of the OTC LinkMarkets (the "OTC") under the symbol "LONCF". The prices in the following tables have been adjusted as applicable to reflect the two to one Share Consolidation implemented by the Company in September 2019.
63
Toronto Stock Exchange
The Company's common shares commenced trading on the TSX on April 26, 2013. Prior to April 26, 2013, such shares traded on the TSX Venture Exchange (the "TSX-V"). From April 27, 2011 to April 24, 2014, the Company’s common shares were traded in the United States on the NYSE MKT (under the symbol "LON") and from April 25, 2014 to April 30, 2015, the Company’s common shares were quoted in the United States on the OTCQB tier of the OTC Link.
Toronto Stock Exchange/TSX Venture Exchange
Exchange. The following table discloses the annual high and low sales prices in Canadian dollars for the common shares of the Company for the five most recent financial years of the Company as traded on the TSX and TSX-V, as applicable.TSX:
| Year | High (Cdn$) | Low (Cdn$) |
| 2015 | $0.13 | $0.02 |
| 2014 | $0.27 | $0.04 |
| 2013 | $0.82 | $0.10 |
| 2012 | $1.91 | $0.69 |
| 2011 | $3.75 | $1.18 |
| Year | High (Cdn$) | Low (Cdn$) |
| 2021 | $0.86 | $0.53 |
| 2020 | $0.89 | $0.315 |
| 2019 | $0.49 | $0.13 |
| 2018 | $0.26 | $0.12 |
| 2017 | $0.40 | $0.15 |
The following table discloses the high and low sales prices in Canadian dollars for the common shares of the Company for each quarterly period within the two most recent financial years of the Company as traded on the TSX:
| Quarter Ended | High (Cdn$) | Low (Cdn$) |
| December 31, 2015 | $0.05 | $0.02 |
| September 30, 2015 | $0.11 | $0.035 |
| Quarter Ended | High (Cdn$) | Low (Cdn$) |
| December 31, 2021 | $0.80 | $0.60 |
| September 30, 2021 | $0.74 | $0.54 |
| June 30, 2021 | $1.16 | $0.78 |
| March 31, 2021 | $0.81 | $0.50 |
| December 31, 2020 | $0.87 | $0.51 |
| September 30, 2020 | $0.89 | $0.47 |
| June 30, 2020 | $0.70 | $0.36 |
| March 31, 2020 | $0.88 | $0.315 |
61
| Quarter Ended | High (Cdn$) | Low (Cdn$) |
| June 30, 2015 | $0.13 | $0.05 |
| March 31, 2015 | $0.125 | $0.025 |
| December 31, 2014 | $0.12 | $0.04 |
| September 30, 2014 | $0.18 | $0.085 |
| June 30, 2014 | $0.14 | $0.05 |
| March 31, 2014 | $0.27 | $0.11 |
The following table discloses the monthly high and low sales prices in Canadian dollars for the common shares of the Company for the most recent six months as traded on the TSX:
| Month | High (Cdn$) | Low (Cdn$) |
| April 2022 (1) | $0.60 | $0.45 |
| March 2022 | $0.66 | $0.56 |
| February 2022 | $0.62 | $0.49 |
| January 2022 | $0.65 | $0.55 |
| December 2021 | $0.80 | $0.63 |
| November 2021 | $0.86 | $0.67 |
| October 2021 | $0.81 | $0.60 |
| Month | High (Cdn$) | Low (Cdn$) |
| March 2016 (to March 21) | $0.065 | $0.03 |
| February 2016 | $0.045 | $0.015 |
| January 2016 | $0.04 | $0.015 |
| December 2015 | $0.04 | $0.02 |
| November 2015 | $0.035 | $0.02 |
| October 2015 | $0.05 | $0.035 |
| September 2015 | $0.06 | $0.05 |
64
_________________________________
(1)From April 1, 2022 to April 25, 2022.
US Trading
From April 27, 2011 to April 24, 2014, the Company's common shares were traded in the United States on the NYSE American, from April 25, 2014 to April 30, 2015, the Company's common shares traded in the United States on the OTCQB tier of the OTC, from May 1, 2015 to June 20, 2019, the Company's common shares traded in the United States on the OTC Pink tier of the OTC, and from June 21, 2019 to July 31, 2020, the Company's common shares traded in the United States on the OTCQB tier of the OTC. Since August 3, 2020, the Company's common shares have traded in the United States on the OTCQX tier of the OTC.
The following table discloses the annual high and low sales prices in United States dollars for the common shares of the Company for the five most recent financial years of the Company as traded on the NYSE MKT, theOTC Pink, OTCQB tierand OTCQX tiers of the OTC, Link, and the OTC Pink tier of the OTC Link, as applicable. The Company's common shares commenced trading on the NYSE MKT on April 27, 2011 and ceased trading on the NYSE MKT on April 24, 2014, as a result of the Company voluntarily delisting from the NYSE MKT. From April 25, 2014 to April 30, 2015, the Company’s common shares traded in the United States on the OTCQB tier of the OTC Link and since May 1, 2015, the Company’s common shares have traded in the United States on the OTC Pink tier of the OTC Link.
| Year | High (US$) | Low (US$) |
| 2015 | $0.14 | $0.02 |
| 2014 | $0.27 | $0.03 |
| 2013 | $0.87 | $0.08 |
| 2012 | $1.99 | $0.68 |
| 2011 | $3.82 | $0.93 |
| Year | High (US$) | Low (US$) |
| 2021 | $0.969 | $0.394 |
| 2020 | $0.66 | $0.22 |
| 2019 | $0.40 | $0.19 |
| 2018 | $0.18 | $0.08 |
| 2017 | $0.28 | $0.10 |
62
The following table discloses the high and low sales prices in United States dollars for the common shares of the Company for each quarterly period within the two most recent financial years. The Company’s common shares traded on the NYSE MKT until April 24, 2014, and thereafteryears as traded on the OTCQB tierand OTCQX tiers of the OTC, Link from April 25, 2014 until April 30, 2015 and on the OTC Pink tier of the OTC Link since May 1, 2015.as applicable:
| Quarter Ended | High (US$) | Low (US$) |
| December 31, 2021 | $0.672 | $0.478 |
| September 30, 2021 | $0.596 | $0.467 |
| June 30, 2021 | $0.969 | $0.551 |
| March 31, 2021 | $0.662 | $0.394 |
| December 31, 2020 | $0.66 | $0.38 |
| September 30, 2020 | $0.63 | $0.35 |
| June 30, 2020 | $0.50 | $0.26 |
| March 31, 2020 | $0.64 | $0.22 |
| Quarter Ended | High (US$) | Low (US$) |
| December 31, 2015 | $0.03 | $0.02 |
| September 30, 2015 | $0.06 | $0.03 |
| June 30, 2015 | $0.14 | $0.05 |
| March 31, 2015 | $0.08 | $0.02 |
| December 31, 2014 | $0.09 | $0.03 |
| September 30, 2014 | $0.14 | $0.07 |
| June 30, 2014 | $0.16 | $0.05 |
| March 31, 2014 | $0.27 | $0.09 |
65
The following table discloses the monthly high and low sales prices in United States dollars for the common shares of the Company for the most recent six months as traded on the OTC PinkOTCQX tier of the OTC Link.OTC:
| Month | High (US$) | Low (US$) |
| March 2016 (to March 21) | $0.05 | $0.02 |
| February 2016 | $0.02 | $0.01 |
| January 2016 | $0.02 | $0.01 |
| December 2015 | $0.03 | $0.02 |
| November 2015 | $0.02 | $0.02 |
| October 2015 | $0.03 | $0.02 |
| September 2015 | $0.06 | $0.03 |
|
| Month | High (US$) | Low (US$) |
| April 2022 (1) | $0.462 | $0.359 |
| March 2022 | $0.504 | $0.451 |
| February 2022 | $0.472 | $0.394 |
| January 2022 | $0.522 | $0.478 |
| December 2021 | $0.625 | $0.482 |
| November 2021 | $0.672 | $0.553 |
| October 2021 | $0.631 | $0.478 |
_________________________________
(1)From April 1, 2022 to April 25, 2022.
B. Plan of Distribution
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
C. Markets
The Company's outstanding common shares are listed on the TSX and are quoted on the OTC PinkOTCQX tier of the OTC Link.OTC.
63D. Selling Shareholder
|
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
E. Dilution
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
F. Expenses of the Issue
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
66
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
A copy of the Company's articles of amalgamation isand articles of amendment are incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 1.1.Exhibits 1.1, 1.5 and 1.6. The Company's general by-law is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 1.2.
The Company is a corporation governed by the OntarioBusiness Corporations Act (the "OBCA"). Under the OBCA, the articles of the Company may, by "special resolution" (see below for definition), be amended to add, change or remove any rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions, including rights to accrued dividends, in respect of all or any of its shares, whether issued or unissued. Under the OBCA, "special resolution" means a resolution passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders who voted in respect of that resolution or signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution.
The Company’sCompany's articles provide that there are no restrictions on the business the Company may carry on and there are no restrictions on the powers the Company may exercise.
The Company's authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preference shares, issuable in series, of which 151,439,732140,824,174 common shares and no preference shares were issued and outstanding as of March 21, 2016.April 25, 2022. The following is a summary of the material provisions attaching to the common shares and preference shares.
Common Shares - The holders of the common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of the shareholders of the Company and shall have one vote for each common share held at all meetings of the shareholders of the Company, except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares are entitled to vote separately as a class or series. Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the preference shares or any other shares ranking senior to the common shares, the holders of the common shares are entitled to (a) receive any dividends as and when declared by the Board, out of the assets of the Company properly applicable to the payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the board of directors may from time to time determine, and (b) receive the remaining property of the Company in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company.
64
Preference Shares - The Board may issue the preferences shares at any time and from time to time in one or more series, each series of which shall have the designations, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions fixed by the directors. The preference shares of each series shall rank on a parity with the preference shares of every other series, and shall be entitled to priority over the common shares and any other shares of the Company ranking junior to the preference shares, with respect to priority in the payment of dividends and the return of capital and the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company.
Under the Company's general by-law, a director of the Company who is a party to, or who is a director or officer of a party to, or has a material interest in any person who is a party to, a material contract or material transaction or proposed material contract or proposed material transaction with the Company, must disclose the nature and extent of their interest at the time and in the manner provided by the OBCA and such material interest must be entered in the minutes of the meetings of directors or otherwise noted in the records of the Company. Any such material contract or material transaction or proposed material contract or proposed material transaction must be referred to the Board or shareholders for approval even if such contract is one that in the ordinary course of the Company's business would not require approval by the Board or shareholders. Such a director must not attend any part of a meeting of directors during which the contract or transaction is discussed and must not vote on any resolution to approve the same except as provided by the OBCA.
67
Also under the Company's general by-law, the Company's directors may be paid such remuneration for their services as the Board may from time to time determine. The directors are also entitled to be reimbursed for travelling and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending meetings of the Board or any committee thereof.
With respect to borrowing powers, the Company's general by-law provides that, without limiting the borrowing powers of the Company as set forth in the OBCA, the Board may from time to time on behalf of the Company, without authorization of the shareholders:
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
(a)borrow money upon the credit of the Company;
(b)issue, reissue, sell or pledge debt obligations of the Company;
(c)subject to the OBCA, give a guarantee on behalf of the Company to secure performance of an obligation to any person; and
(d)mortgage, hypothecate, pledge, or otherwise create a security interest in all or any property of the Company, owned or subsequently owned, to secure any obligation of the Company.
A director of the Company need not be a shareholder of the Company. There is no age limit requirement for a director of the Company.
The annual meeting of shareholders of the Company is held at such time in each year (but not later than 15 months after holding the last preceding annual meeting of shareholders) and at such place as the Board may from time to time determine. The Board has the power to call a special meeting of shareholders of the Company at any time.
The only persons entitled to be present at a meeting of shareholders are those entitled to vote thereat, the directors and auditor of the Company and others who, although not entitled to vote, are entitled or required under any provision of the OBCA or the articles or by-laws to be present at the meeting. Any other person may be admitted only on the invitation of the chairperson of the meeting or with the consent of the meeting.
65
A quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting of shareholders is two persons present in person, each being a shareholder entitled to vote thereat or a duly appointed proxyholder or representative for a shareholder so entitled.
Disclosure of Share Ownership
In general, under applicable securities regulation in Canada, a person or company who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, voting securities of an issuer or who exercises control or direction over voting securities of an issuer or a combination of both, carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all the issuer's outstanding voting securities is an insider and must, within 10 days of becoming an insider, file a report in the required form effective the date on which the person became an insider. The report must disclose any direct or indirect beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over, securities of the reporting issuer. Additionally, securities regulation in Canada provides for the filing of a report by an insider of a reporting issuer whose holdings change, which report must be filed within five days from the day on which the change takes place.
68
The rules in the U.S. governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed are more stringent than those discussed above. Section 13 of the U.S. Exchange Act imposes reporting requirements on persons who acquire beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the U.S. Exchange Act) of more than 5% of a class of an equity security registered under Section 12 of the U.S. Exchange Act. In general, such persons must file, within 10 days after such acquisition, a report of beneficial ownership with the SEC containing the information prescribed by the regulations under Section 13 of the U.S. Exchange Act. This information is also required to be sent to the issuer of the securities and to each exchange where the securities are traded.
|
C. Material Contracts
Except for contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business and other than as disclosed elsewhere in this Form 20-F, there are no material contracts to which the Company is currently a party that were entered into by the Company or any of its subsidiaries during the two years immediately preceding the date of this Form 20-F.
|
D. Exchange Controls
There are no governmental laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation, including foreign exchange controls, in Canada which may affect the export or import of capital or that may affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company's securities. Any remittances of dividends to United States residents, however, are subject to a withholding tax pursuant to the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980), each as amended. Remittances of interest to U.S. residents entitled to the benefits of such Convention are generally not subject to withholding taxes except in limited circumstances involving participating interest payments. Certain other types of remittances, such as royalties paid to U.S. residents, may be subject to a withholding tax depending on all of the circumstances.
66
Restrictions on Share Ownership by Non-Canadians
There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in the organizational documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of the Company, except that theInvestment Canada Act(the "ICA") may require review and approval by the Minister of Industry (Canada)Innovation, Science and Economic Development ("ISED") of certain acquisitions of "control" of the Company by a "non-Canadian". The threshold for acquisitions is generally defined as being one-third or more of the voting shares of the Company. "Non-Canadian" generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.
Under the ICA, transactions exceeding certain financial thresholds, and which involve the acquisition of control of a Canadian business by a non-Canadian, are subject to review and cannot be implemented unless the ISED Minister of Industry and/or, in the case of a Canadian business engaged in cultural activities, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, are satisfied that the transaction is likely to be of "net benefit to Canada". If a transaction is subject to review (a "Reviewable Transaction"), an application for review must be filed with the Investment Review Division of IndustryISED Canada and/or the Department of Canadian Heritage prior to the implementation of the Reviewable Transaction. The responsible Minister is then required to determine whether the Reviewable Transaction is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, taking into account, among other things, certain factors specified in the ICA and any written undertakings that may have been given by the applicant. The ICA contemplates an initial review period of up to 45 days after filing; however, if the responsible Minister has not completed the review by that date, s/he may unilaterally extend the review period by up to 30 days (or such longer period as may be agreed to by the applicant and the Minister) to permit completion of the review. If the responsible Minister is not satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, s/he may prohibit the investment or order a divestiture (if the investment has already been completed).
Even if69
If the transaction is not reviewable because it does not meet or exceed the applicable financial threshold, the non-Canadian investor must still give notice to IndustryISED Canada and, in the case of a Canadian business engaged in cultural activities, Canadian Heritage, of its acquisition of control of a Canadian business within 30 days of the implementation of the investment.
Furthermore, under the ICA, every investment in, or acquisition of control of, a Canadian business by a non-Canadian is subject to a "national security" review which examines whether the transaction could be injurious to Canada’sCanada's national security. There is no minimum threshold for the size of transaction potentially subject to such review. If the ISED Minister, of Industry, after consultation with the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and the investor, considers that the investment could be injurious to national security, the Minister refers the matter to the Governor in Council. Following its review, if the Governor in Council may take any measures in respect of the investment that it considers advisable to protect national security, including denying the investment, asking for undertakings, imposing terms or conditions for the investment or ordering a divestiture (if the investment has already been completed).
|
E. Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares of the Company ("Common Shares").
This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares. In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such U.S. Holder, including specific tax consequences to a U.S. Holder under an applicable tax treaty. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any particular U.S. Holder. Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. This summary does not address the U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreignnon-U.S. tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares. Each prospective U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreignnon-U.S. tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.
67
No legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.considerations applicable to U.S. Holders as discussed in this summary. This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded from taking a position that is different from, and contrary to, the positions taken in this summary. In addition, because the authorities on which this summary is based are subject to various interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts could disagree with one or more of the conclusions described in this summary.
70
Scope of this Summary
Authorities
This summary is based on theInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the "Canada-U.S. Tax Convention"), and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this document. Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis which could affect the U.S. federal income tax considerations described in this summary. This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis.
U.S. Holders
For purposes of this summary, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of Common Shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
- an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;
- a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
- an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
- a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
68
Non-U.S. Holders
For purposes of this summary, a "non-U.S. Holder" is a beneficial owner of Common Shares that is not a U.S. Holder. This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to non-U.S. Holders arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares. Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences (including the potential application of and operation of any income tax treaties) relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.
U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed
This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, U.S. Holders that: (a) are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) are financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) are broker-dealers, dealers, or traders in securities or currencies that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) have a “functional currency”"functional currency" other than the U.S. dollar; (e) own Common Shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position;integrated transaction; (f) acquired Common Shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) hold Common Shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes); or (h) are subject to the alternative minimum tax; (i) are partnerships and other pass-through entities (and investors in such partnerships and entities); (j) are S corporations (and shareholders thereof); (k) own, have owned or will own (directly, indirectly, or by attribution) 10% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the outstanding shares of the Company. This summary also does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders who are: (a)Company; (l) are U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.; (b) persons that have been, are, or will be a resident or deemed to be a resident in Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Tax Act"); (c) persons that use or hold, will use or hold, or that are or will be deemed to use or(m) hold Common Shares in connection with carrying on a business in Canada; (d) persons whose Common Shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” under the Tax Act;trade or (e) persons that have abusiness, permanent establishment, or fixed base outside the United States or are otherwise subject to taxing jurisdictions other than, or in Canada for purposes ofaddition to, the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention.U.S.; or (n) are subject to special tax accounting rules with respect to the Common Shares. U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreignnon-U.S. tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.
71
If an entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (or other “pass-through”"pass-through" entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such entity and the partners (or other owners) of such entity generally will depend on the activities of the entity and the status of such partners (or owners). This summary does not address the tax consequences to any such owner. Partners (or other owners) of entities or arrangements that are classified as partnerships or as “pass-through”"pass-through" entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
If the Company were to constitute a “passive"passive foreign investment company”company" under the meaning of Section 1297 of the Code (a “"PFIC”", as defined below) for any year during a U.S. Holder’sHolder's holding period, then certain potentially adverse rules will affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder resulting from the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares. The Company believes that it was classified as a PFIC during the tax year ended December 31, 2015,2021, and due to the nature of the Company’sCompany's assets and the income that the Company expects to generate, the Company expects to be a PFIC for its current tax year and may be a PFIC in subsequent tax years. No opinion of legal counsel or ruling from the IRS concerning the status of the Company as a PFIC has been obtained or is currently planned to be requested. The determination of whether any corporation was, or will be, a PFIC for a tax year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations. In addition, whether any corporation will be a PFIC for any tax year depends on the assets and income of such corporation over the course of each such tax year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this document. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge any determination made by the Company (or any subsidiary of the Company) concerning its PFIC status. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the PFIC status of the Company and any subsidiary of the Company.
69
In addition, in any year in which the Company is classified as a PFIC, such holder will be required to file an annual report with the IRS containing such information as Treasury Regulations and/or other IRS guidance may require. AIn addition to penalties, a failure to satisfy such reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing such information returns under these rules, including the requirement to file a IRS Form 8621.8621 annually.
72
The Company generally will be a PFIC if, for a tax year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of the Company is passive income (the "income test") or (b) 50% or more of the value of the Company’sCompany's assets either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, based on the quarterly average of the fair market value of such assets (the "asset test"). “Gross income”"Gross income" generally includes all sales revenues less the cost of goods sold, plus income from investments and from incidental or outside operations or sources, and “passive income”"passive income" generally includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions.
Active business gains arising from the sale of commodities generally are excluded from passive income if substantially all (85% or more) of a foreign corporation’scorporation's commodities are stock in trade or inventory, depreciable property used in a trade or business, or supplies regularly used or consumed in a trade or business and certain other requirements are satisfied.
For purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, if the Company owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the outstanding shares of another corporation, the Company will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. In addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, and assuming certain other requirements are met, “passive income”"passive income" does not include certain interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by the Company from certain “related persons”"related persons" (as defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not passive income.
Under certain attribution rules, if the Company is a PFIC, U.S. Holders will generally be deemed to own their proportionate share of the Company’sCompany's direct or indirect equity interest in any company that is also a PFIC (a "Subsidiary PFIC"), and will be subject to U.S. federal income tax under the "Default PFIC Rules under Section 1291 of the Code" discussed below on their proportionate share of (a) any “excess"excess distributions,”" as described below, on the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC and (b) a disposition or deemed disposition of the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC by the Company or another Subsidiary PFIC, both as if such U.S. Holders directly held the shares of such Subsidiary PFIC. In addition, U.S. Holders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any indirect gain realized on the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC on the sale or disposition of Common Shares. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should be aware that they could be subject to tax under the PFIC rules even if no distributions are received and no redemptions or other dispositions of Common Shares are made.
70
Default PFIC Rules Under Section 1291 of the Code
If the Company is a PFIC for any tax year during which a U.S. Holder owns Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such U.S. Holder of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares will depend on whether and when such U.S. Holder makes an election to treat the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, if any, as a “qualified"qualified electing fund”fund" or “QEF”"QEF" under Section 1295 of the Code (a "QEF Election") or makes a mark-to-market election under Section 1296 of the Code (a "Mark-to-Market Election"). A U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election will be referred to in this summary as a "Non-Electing U.S. Holder".
A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code (described below) with respect to (a) any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares and (b) any excess distribution received on the Common Shares. A distribution generally will be an “excess distribution”"excess distribution" to the extent that such distribution (together with all other distributions received in the current tax year) exceeds 125% of the average distributions received during the three preceding tax years (or during a U.S. Holder’sHolder's holding period for the Common Shares, if shorter).
73
Under Section 1291 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares (including an indirect disposition of the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC), and any “excess distribution”"excess distribution" received on Common Shares or with respect to the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC, must be ratably allocated to each day in a Non-Electing U.S. Holder’sHolder's holding period for the respective Common Shares. The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to the tax year of disposition or distribution of the excess distribution and to years before the entity became a PFIC, if any, would be taxed as ordinary income. The amounts allocated to any other tax year would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax rate applicable to ordinary income (and not eligible for certain preferential tax rates, as discussed below) in each such year, and an interest charge would be imposed on the tax liability for each such year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such year. A Non-Electing U.S. Holder that is not a corporation must treat any such interest paid as “personal"personal interest,”" which is not deductible.
If the Company is a PFIC for any tax year during which a Non-Electing U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, the Company will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such Non-Electing U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the Company ceases to be a PFIC in one or more subsequent tax years. AIf the Company ceases to be a PFIC, a Non-Electing U.S. Holder may terminate this deemed PFIC status by electing to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above), but not loss, as if such Common Shares were sold on the last day of the last tax year for which the Company was a PFIC.
QEF Election
A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election for the first tax year in which its holding period of its Common Shares begins generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above with respect to its Common Shares. A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S. Holder’sHolder's pro rata share of (a) the net capital gain of the Company, which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to such U.S. Holder, and (b) the ordinary earnings of the Company, which will be taxed as ordinary income to such U.S. Holder. Generally, “net"net capital gain”gain" is the excess of (a) net long-term capital gain over (b) net short-term capital loss, and “ordinary earnings”"ordinary earnings" are the excess of (a) “earnings"earnings and profits”profits" over (b) net capital gain. A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each tax year in which the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such U.S. Holder by the Company. However, for any tax year in which the Company is a PFIC and has no net income or gain, U.S. Holders that have made a QEF Election would not have any income inclusions as a result of the QEF Election. If a U.S. Holder that made a QEF Election has an income inclusion, such a U.S. Holder may, subject to certain limitations, elect to defer payment of current U.S. federal income tax on such amounts, subject to an interest charge. If such U.S. Holder is not a corporation, any such interest paid will be treated as “personal"personal interest,”" which is not deductible.
71
A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election with respect to the Company generally (a) may receive a tax-free distribution from the Company to the extent that such distribution represents “earnings"earnings and profits”profits" of the Company that were previously included in income by the U.S. Holder because of such QEF Election and (b) will adjust such U.S. Holder’sHolder's tax basis in the Common Shares to reflect the amount included in income or allowed as a tax-free distribution because of such QEF Election. In addition, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares.
74
The procedure for making a QEF Election, and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of making a QEF Election, will depend on whether such QEF Election is timely. A QEF Election will be treated as “timely”"timely" if such QEF Election is made for the first year in the U.S. Holder’sHolder's holding period for the Common Shares in which the Company was a PFIC. A U.S. Holder may make a timely QEF Election by filing the appropriate QEF Election documents at the time such U.S. Holder files a U.S. federal income tax return for such year. If a U.S. Holder does not make a timely and effective QEF Election for the first year in the U.S. Holder’sHolder's holding period for the Common Shares, the U.S. Holder may still be able to make a timely and effective QEF Election in a subsequent year if such U.S. Holder meets certain requirements and makes a “purging”"purging" election to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above) as if such Common Shares were sold for their fair market value on the day the QEF Election is effective. If a U.S. Holder owns PFIC stock indirectly through another PFIC, separate QEF Elections must be made for the PFIC in which the U.S. Holder is a direct shareholder and the Subsidiary PFIC for the QEF rules to apply to both PFICs.
A QEF Election will apply to the tax year for which such QEF Election is timely made and to all subsequent tax years, unless such QEF Election is invalidated or terminated or the IRS consents to revocation of such QEF Election. If a U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election and, in a subsequent tax year, the Company ceases to be a PFIC, the QEF Election will remain in effect (although it will not be applicable) during those tax years in which the Company is not a PFIC. Accordingly, if the Company becomes a PFIC in another subsequent tax year, the QEF Election will be effective and the U.S. Holder will be subject to the QEF rules described above during any subsequent tax year in which the Company qualifies as a PFIC.
U.S. Holders should be aware that there can be no assurances that the Company will satisfy the record keeping requirements that apply to a QEF, or that the Company will supply U.S. Holders with a PFIC Annual Information Statement or other information that such U.S. Holders are required to report under the QEF rules, in the event that the Company is a PFIC. Thus, U.S. Holders may not be able to make a QEF Election with respect to their Common Shares. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a QEF Election.
A U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election by attaching a completed IRS Form 8621, including a PFIC Annual Information Statement, to a timely filed United States federal income tax return. However, if the Company cannot provide the required information with regard to the Company or any of its Subsidiary PFICs, U.S. Holders will not be able to make a QEF Election for such entity and will continue to be subject to the rules discussed above that apply to Non-Electing U.S. Holders with respect to the taxation of gains and excess distributions.
72
Mark-to-Market Election
A U.S. Holder may make a Mark-to-Market Election only if the Common Shares are marketable stock. The Common Shares generally will be “marketable stock”"marketable stock" if the Common Shares are regularly traded on (a) a national securities exchange that is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, (b) the national market system established pursuant to section 11A of theSecurities andU.S. Exchange Act of 1934, or (c) a foreign securities exchange that is regulated or supervised by a governmental authority of the country in which the market is located, provided that (i) such foreign exchange has trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, and surveillance requirements, and meets other requirements and the laws of the country in which such foreign exchange is located, together with the rules of such foreign exchange, ensure that such requirements are actually enforced and (ii) the rules of such foreign exchange effectively promote active trading of listed stocks. If such stock is traded on such a qualified exchange or other market, such stock generally will be “regularly traded”"regularly traded" for any calendar year during which such stock is traded, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter.
75
A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election with respect to its Common Shares generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above with respect to such Common Shares. However, if a U.S. Holder does not make a Mark-to-Market Election beginning in the first tax year of such U.S. Holder’sHolder's holding period for the Common Shares or such U.S. Holder has not made a timely QEF Election, the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above will apply to certain dispositions of, and distributions on, the Common Shares.
A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will include in ordinary income, for each tax year in which the Company is a PFIC, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of the Common Shares, as of the close of such tax year over (b) such U.S. Holder’sHolder's tax basis in such Common Shares. A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) such U.S. Holder’sHolder's adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares, over (b) the fair market value of such Common Shares (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years).
A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally also will adjust such U.S. Holder’sHolder's tax basis in the Common Shares to reflect the amount included in gross income or allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election. In addition, upon a sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, a U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will recognize ordinary income or ordinary loss (not to exceed the excess, if any, of (a) the amount included in ordinary income because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years over (b) the amount allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years). Losses that exceed this limitation are subject to the rules generally applicable to losses provided in the Code and Treasury Regulations.
A Mark-to-Market Election applies to the tax year in which such Mark-to-Market Election is made and to each subsequent tax year, unless the Common Shares cease to be “marketable stock”"marketable stock" or the IRS consents to revocation of such election. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a Mark-to-Market Election.
Although aA U.S. Holder may be eligible to makemakes a Mark-to-Market Election with respectby attaching a completed IRS Form 8621 to a timely filed U.S. federal income tax return. A timely Mark-to-Market Election applies to the tax year in which such Mark-to-Market Election is made and to each subsequent tax year, unless the Common Shares nocease to be "marketable stock" or the IRS consents to revocation of such election may be made with respect to the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC that aelection. Each U.S. Holder is treated as owning, because such stock is not marketable. Hence,should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a Mark-to-Market Election will not be effective to eliminate the application of the default rules of Section 1291 of the Code described above with respect to deemed dispositions of Subsidiary PFIC stock or excess distributions from a Subsidiary PFIC.Election.
73
Other PFIC Rules
Under Section 1291(f) of the Code, the IRS has issued proposed Treasury Regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would cause a U.S. Holder that had not made a timely QEF Election to recognize gain (but not loss) upon certain transfers of Common Shares that would otherwise be tax-deferred (e.g., gifts and exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations). However, the specific U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder may vary based on the manner in which Common Shares are transferred.
Certain additional adverse rules may apply with respect to a U.S. Holder if the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election. For example, under Section 1298(b)(6) of the Code, a U.S. Holder that uses Common Shares as security for a loan will, except as may be provided in Treasury Regulations, be treated as having made a taxable disposition of such Common Shares.
76
In addition, a U.S. Holder who acquires Common Shares from a decedent will not receive a "step up" in tax basis of such Common Shares to fair market value.
Special rules also apply to the amount of foreign tax credit that a U.S. Holder may claim on a distribution from a PFIC. Subject to such special rules, foreign taxes paid with respect to any distribution in respect of stock in a PFIC are generally eligible for the foreign tax credit. The rules relating to distributions by a PFIC and their eligibility for the foreign tax credit are complicated, and a U.S. Holder should consult with its own tax advisor regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit with respect to distributions by a PFIC.
The PFIC rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the PFIC rules (including the applicability and advisability of a QEF Election or Mark-to-Market Election) and how the PFIC rules may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.
Ownership and Disposition of Common Shares to the Extent that the PFIC Rules do not Apply
The following discussion is subject in its entirety to the rules described above under the heading “Passive"Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”"
Distributions on Common Shares
A U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with respect to a Common Share will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated “earnings"earnings and profits”profits" of the Company, as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A dividend generally will be taxed to a U.S. Holder at ordinary income tax rates if the Company is a PFIC.PFIC for the tax year of such distribution or the preceding tax year. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated “earnings"earnings and profits”profits" of the Company, such distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Common Shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of such Common Shares. (See “ Sale"Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares”Shares" below). However, the Company may not maintain the calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by the Company with respect to the Common Shares will constitute ordinary dividend income. Dividends received on Common Shares generally will not be eligible for the “dividends"dividends received deduction”.deduction" generally applicable to corporations. Subject to applicable limitations and provided the Company is eligible for the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention or the Common Shares are readily tradable on a United States securities market, dividends paid by the Company to non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, generally will be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains for dividends, provided certain holding period and other conditions are satisfied, including that the Company not be classified as a PFIC in the tax year of distribution or in the preceding tax year. The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the application of such rules.
74
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares
Upon the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of cash received plus the fair market value of any property received and such U.S. Holder's tax basis in such Common Shares sold or otherwise disposed of. A U.S. Holder’sHolder's tax basis in Common Shares generally will be such holder’sholder's U.S. dollar cost for such Common Shares. Gain or loss recognized on such sale or other disposition generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale or other disposition, the Common Shares have been held for more than one year.
77
Preferential tax rates currently apply to long-term capital gain of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gain of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.
Additional Considerations
Additional Tax on Passive Income
Certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts (other than trusts that are exempt from tax) will be subject to a 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income,” which includes dividends on the Common Shares and net gains from the disposition of the Common Shares. Further, excess distributions treated as dividends, gains treated as excess distributions under the PFIC rules discussed above, and mark-to-market inclusions and deductions are all included in the calculation of net investment income.
Treasury Regulations provide, subject to the election described in the following paragraph, that solely for purposes of this additional tax, that distributions of previously taxed income will be treated as dividends and included in net investment income subject to the additional 3.8% tax. Additionally, to determine the amount of any capital gain from the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares that will be subject to the additional tax on net investment income, a U.S. Holder who has made a QEF Election will be required to recalculate its basis in the Common Shares excluding QEF basis adjustments.
Alternatively, a U.S. Holder may make an election which will be effective with respect to all interests in a PFIC for which a QEF Election has been made and which is held in that year or acquired in future years. Under this election, a U.S. Holder pays the additional 3.8% tax on QEF income inclusions and on gains calculated after giving effect to related tax basis adjustments. U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts should consult their own tax advisors regarding the applicability of this tax to any of their income or gains in respect of the Common Shares.
Receipt of Foreign Currency
The amount of any distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign currency, or on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time). AIf the foreign currency is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder who converts or otherwise disposes of the foreign currency after the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. Different rules apply to U.S. Holders who use the accrual method of tax accounting. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.
75
Foreign Tax Credit
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. Holder that pays (whether directly or through withholding) Canadian income tax with respect to dividends paid on the Common Shares generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such Canadian income tax. Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder’sHolder's U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder’sHolder's income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.
Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability that such U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.” Generally, dividends paid by a foreign corporation should be treated as foreign source for this purpose, and gains recognized on the sale of stock of a foreign corporation by a U.S. Holder should be treated as U.S. source for this purpose, except as otherwise provided in an applicable income tax treaty, and if an election is properly made under the Code. However, the amount of a distribution with respect to the Common Shares that is treated as a “dividend” may be lower for U.S. federal income tax purposes than it is for Canadian federal income tax purposes, resulting in a reduced foreign tax credit allowance to a U.S. Holder. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific categories of income. The foreign tax credit rules are complex and eachinvolve the application of rules that depend on a U.S. Holder's particular circumstances. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Under U.S. federal income tax law and Treasury Regulations, certain categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with respect to their investment in, or involvement in, a foreign corporation. For example, U.S. return disclosure obligations (and related penalties) are imposed on individuals who are U.S. Holders that hold certain specified foreign financial assets in excess of certain threshold amounts. The definition of specified foreign financial assets includes not only financial accounts maintained in foreign financial institutions, but also, unless held in accounts maintained by a financial institution, any stock or security issued by a non-U.S. person, any financial instrument or contract held for investment that has an issuer or counterparty other than a U.S. person and any interest in a foreign entity. U.S. Holders may be subject to these reporting requirements unless their Common Shares are held in an account at certain financial institutions. Penalties for failure to file certain of these information returns are substantial. U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns, including the requirement to file an IRS Form 8938.
78
Payments made within the U.S. or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, Common Shares will generally be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, currently at the rate of 28%24%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’sHolder's correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on IRS Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax. However, certain exempt persons generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’sHolder's U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner.
The discussion of reporting requirements set forth above is not intended to constitute a complete description of all reporting requirements that may apply to a U.S. Holder. A failure to satisfy certain reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax and under certain circumstances, such an extension may apply to assessments of amounts unrelated to any unsatisfied reporting requirement. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules.
76THE ABOVE SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF ALL TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO U.S. HOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP, AND DISPOSITION OF COMMON SHARES. U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO THEM IN THEIR OWN PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.
|
F.Dividends and Paying Agents
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
G. Statement By Experts
This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.
|
H. Documents on Display
The documents referred to and/or incorporated by reference in this Form 20-F can be viewed at the office of the Company at 1 First Canadian Place, 100 King Street West, Suite 7070, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada. The Company is required to file financial statements and other information with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the Canadian provinces (other than Quebec), electronically through the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), which can be viewed atwww.sedar.com. The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the U.S. Exchange Act and files reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any of the Company’s reports and other information at, and obtain copies upon payment of prescribed fees from, the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., U.S., 20549. In addition, theThe SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
|
79
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
See Note 1517 to the Company's audited consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 20-F under Item 18.
Item 12. Descriptions of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
77
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.
Not applicable.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.
14.A.-D. Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders
The Company was formed under the OBCA on August 24, 1993 by articles of amalgamation. The name of the Company upon amalgamation was Taylor Rand Incorporated. On June 25, 1996, pursuant to the filing of articles of amendment, the Company changed its name from Taylor Rand Incorporated to Sheridan Reserve Incorporated and consolidated its outstanding common shares. Articles of amendment were filed by the Company on January 28, 1997 to consolidate its outstanding series of preference shares. The Company changed its name from Sheridan Reserve Incorporated to Nevadabobs.com Inc. on August 4, 2000 pursuant to the filing of articles of amendment. The Company changed its name from Nevadabobs.com Inc. to Nevada Bob’sBob's International Inc. on August 24, 2001 pursuant to articles of amendment. Articles of amendment were filed by the Company on May 6, 2002 to consolidate its outstanding common shares. Articles of amendment were filed by the Company on April 30, 2003 to create a series of preference shares. On November 28, 2008, immediately following the acquisition by the Company of Old Loncor, the Company filed articles of amalgamation which amalgamated the Company with Old Loncor and changed the Company’sCompany's name from Nevada Bob's International Inc. to Loncor Resources Inc. Pursuant to articles of amendment dated September 19, 2019, the Company consolidated its outstanding common shares on a two to one basis. All amounts in this Form 20-F have been adjusted to reflect this share consolidation. The Company changed its name from Loncor Resources Inc. to Loncor Gold Inc. on June 7, 2021 pursuant to articles of amendment.
|
14.E. Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
80
Item 15. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the U.S. Exchange Act) for the year ended December 31, 2015.2021. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed and are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the U.S. Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms.
In addition, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed under the U.S. Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
78
(b) Management’sManagement's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the U.S. Exchange Act. The Company's management has employed a framework consistent with U.S. Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c), to evaluate the Company's internal control over financial reporting described below. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS.International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IFRS").
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152021 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20152021 and no material weaknesses were discovered.
(c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
This annual report on Form 20-F does not include an attestation report of the Company’sCompany's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Under theJumpstart Our Business & Startups Act(“"JOBS Act”"), emerging growth companies are exempt from Section 404(b) of theSarbanes-Oxley Act, which generally requires public companies to provide an independent auditor attestation of management’smanagement's assessment of the effectiveness of their internal control over financial reporting. The Company qualifies as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act and therefore has not included an independent auditor attestation of management’smanagement's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting.
81
(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, that management believes have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.
The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
79Item 16.A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Company's Board has determined that William R. Wilson satisfies the requirements as an audit committee financial expert, in that he has an understanding of IFRS and financial statements; is able to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; has experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company's financial statements (or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities); has an understanding of internal controls over financial reporting; and has an understanding of audit committee functions. Mr. Wilson is independent as defined in Section 803A of the NYSE MKTAmerican LLC Company Guide.
Item 16.B. Code of Ethics.
The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees (including the Company’sCompany's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) (the "Code"). A copy of the Code is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 1.4. A copy of the Code may also be obtained free of charge from the Chief Financial Officer of the Company at (416) 366-2221dmadilo@loncor.com and is also available on SEDAR atwww.sedar.com, EDGAR atwww.sec.gov and the Company's website atwww.loncor.com. Each director, officer and employee of the Company is provided with a copy of the Code and is required to confirm annually that he or she has complied with the Code. Any observed breaches of the Code must be reported to the Company's Chief Executive Officer.
82
No amendment was made to the Code during the Company's most recently completed financial year and no waiver from a provision of the Code was granted by the Company during the Company's most recently completed financial year.
In accordance with the OBCA(OBCA(the Company's governing corporate legislation), directors of the Company who are a party to, or are a director or an officer of or have a material interest in a party to, a material contract or material transaction or a proposed material contract or proposed material transaction, are required to disclose the nature and extent of their interest and not to vote on any resolution to approve the contract or transaction. In addition, in certain cases, an independent committee of the Company's Board may be formed to deliberate on such matters in the absence of the interested party.
The Company has also adopted a "whistleblower" policy which provides employees, consultants, officers and directors with the ability to report, on a confidential and anonymous basis, violations within the Company's organization including, (but not limited to), questionable accounting practices, disclosure of fraudulent or misleading financial information, instances of corporate fraud, or harassment. The Company believes that providing a forum for such individuals to raise concerns about ethical conduct and treating all complaints with the appropriate level of seriousness fosters a culture of ethical business conduct. The Company has also adopted an insider trading policy to encourage and promote a culture of ethical business conduct.
80Item 16.C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following summarizes the total fees billed by Kreston GTA LLP, Markham, Ontario, Canada (PCAOB ID 6644), the external auditors of the Company, (BDO Canada LLP) for each of the years ended December 31, 20152021 and December 31, 2014.2020. All dollar amounts are exclusive of applicable taxes.
|
| 2021 | 2020 | |
| Audit Fees | Cdn$45,000 | Cdn$45,000 |
| Audit-Related Fees | Nil | Nil |
| Tax Fees | Cdn$5,000 | Cdn$5,000 |
| All Other Fees | Nil | Nil |
In accordance with existing Audit Committee policy and the requirements of theSarbanes-Oxley Act, all services to be provided by BDO Canada LLPthe external auditors of the Company are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee. This includes audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. In some cases, pre-approval is provided by the full Audit Committee for up to a year, and relates to a particular category or group of services and is subject to a specific budget. All of the fees listed above have been approved by the Audit Committee.
Item 16.D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16.E. Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The Company did not purchase any of its common shares during the financial year ended December 31, 2015.2021.
83
Item 16.F. Change in Registrant's Certifying Accountant
Not applicable.
Item 16.G. Corporate Governance
Not applicable.
Item 16.H. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 16.I. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
Not applicable.
81Item 18. Financial Statements
The financial statements appear on pages F-1 through F -26.F-37.
Item 19. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 20-F:
| EXHIBIT NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
| 1.1 | Company's articles of amalgamation (1) |
| 1.2 | Company's general by-law (1) |
| 1.3 | Audit Committee's charter (1) |
| 1.4 | Company's Business Conduct Policy (1) |
| 1.5 | Company's articles of amendment (1A) |
| 1.6 | Company's articles of amendment (1B) |
| Material Contracts | |
| 4.1 | Company's stock option plan |
84
| Subsidiaries | |||||
| 8.1 | List of subsidiaries of the Company | ||||
| 12.1 | Certification of the | ||||
| 12.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
| 13.1 | Certification of the | ||||
| 13.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
| Other Exhibits | |||||
| 15.1 | Management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, | ||||
| 15.2 | |||||
| 15.3 | Consent of Christian Bawah for Technical Report | ||||
| Technical Report Summary on the Mineral Resources of the Imbo Projec | |||||
| 101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document–the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File as its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document | |
| 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
| 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
| 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
| 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as | |
82Notes:
(1)Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's annual report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 30, 2012. SEC file number 001-35124.
(1A)Previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's current report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2020.
(1B)Previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's current report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on April 19, 2022.
85
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
Date: April 29, 2022
| LONCOR GOLD INC. | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| (signed) "John Barker" | ||
| John Barker | ||
83
CONSOLIDATEDCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DecemberDecember 31, 20152021
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)Dollars - audited)
F-1
PageF-1Contents ofF-26
CONTENTS
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Management's | |
| Report of Independent | |
| Consolidated Statements of Financial Position | |
| Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss | |
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity | |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |
| NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
| 1.Corporate Information | |
| 2.Basis of Preparation | |
| 3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6.Advances receivable and prepaid expenses | 23 |
| 7.Related party transactions | |
| 27 | |
| 14.Share Capital | |
PageF-2 ofF-26
| 21.Government Assistance | 37 |
| 22.Events after the reporting period | 37 |
Management’sF-2
Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and are the responsibility of the management of Loncor ResourcesGold Inc. (the “Company”"Company"). The financial information presented elsewhere in the Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis is consistent with the data that is contained in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements, where necessary, include amounts which are based on the best estimates and judgments of management.
In order to discharge management’smanagement's responsibility for the integrity of the consolidated financial statements, the Company maintains a system of internal controls. These controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company’sCompany's assets are safeguarded, transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with management’smanagement's authorization, proper records are maintained and relevant and reliable information is produced. These controls include maintaining quality standards in hiring and training of employees, policies and procedures manuals, a corporate code of conduct and ensuring that there is proper accountability for performance within appropriate and well-defined areas of responsibility. The system of internal controls is further supported by a compliance function, which is designed to ensure that we and our employees comply with securities legislation and conflict of interest rules.
The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing management’smanagement's performance of its responsibilities for financial reporting and internal control. The Audit Committee, which is composed of non-executive directors, meets with management as well as the external auditors to ensure that management is properly fulfilling its financial reporting responsibilities to the Directors who approve the consolidated financial statements. The external auditors have full and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee to discuss the scope of their audits, the adequacy of the system of internal controls and review reporting issues.
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20152021 have been audited by BDO CanadaKreston GTA LLP, chartered professional accountantsChartered Professional Accountants and licensed public accountants,Licensed Public Accountants, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
| (Signed) | (Signed) | ||
| Donat K. Madilo | |||
| Chief Financial Officer |
F-3
PageF-3 ofF-26REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Directors of Loncor ResourcesGold Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial statementsposition of Loncor ResourcesGold Inc., which comprise (the "Company") as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2015loss and December 31, 2014 and the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014,2021, 2020, and December 31,2013,2019, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements").
Management's Responsibility forIn our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in accordanceall material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessaryBoard.
Material Uncertainty Related to enableGoing Concern
We draw attention to Note 2 in the preparation of consolidated financial statements, which describe the events and conditions that indicate the existence of material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordanceare a public accounting firm registered with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement, of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to frauderror or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considersfraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control relevantover financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to the entity's preparation and fair presentationobtain an understanding of the consolidatedinternal control over financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances,reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal controls. An auditcontrol over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also includesincluded evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policiesprinciples used and the reasonableness of accountingsignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our audit opinion.
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2019.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
F-4
Critical Audit Matter Description
In our opinion,We identified the impairment assessment of exploration and evaluation assets as a key audit matter due to significant auditor and management judgement and estimation involved in determining the recoverable amount. As disclosed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positioncarrying value of Loncor Resources Inc.the Company's exploration and evaluation assets were approximately $38 million as at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 20132021. As discussed in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Emphasis of Matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attentionNote 3 to Note 2 in the consolidated financial statements, which indicates the Company produced a net losscarrying value of $2,417,247 forexploration and evaluation is reviewed each reporting period to determine whether there is any indication of impairment or reversal of impairment.
How the year ended December 31, 2015Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our primary procedures to address this critical audit matter include i) testing the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company's process to assess indicators of impairment or reversal of impairment; ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the methods and asvaluation models used; and iii) evaluating the reasonableness of that date the Company’s accumulated deficit was $58,091,493. These conditions, along with other matters as set forthsignificant assumptions used by management. We also assessed the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the Company's personnel involved in Note 2, indicatepreparing the existence of a material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.impairment assessment.
/s/ BDO Canada LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto,Markham, Canada
March 30, 201631, 2022
Kreston GTA LLP 6644
F-5
PageF-4 ofF-26
Loncor |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
(Expressed in U.S. dollars) |
| Notes | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
| $ | $ | ||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||
| Current Assets | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 8,255 | 55,631 | |||||||
| Advances receivable | 5 | 42,000 | 32,965 | ||||||
| Due from related parties | 6 | 12,619 | 9,880 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and deposits | 67,846 | 69,148 | |||||||
| Total Current Assets | 130,720 | 167,624 | |||||||
| Non-Current Assets | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 7 | 82,075 | 192,846 | ||||||
| Exploration and evaluation assets | 8 | 27,836,230 | 29,590,927 | ||||||
| Intangible assets | 9 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Total Non-Current Assets | 27,918,306 | 29,783,774 | |||||||
| Total Assets | 28,049,026 | 29,951,398 | |||||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||
| Accounts payable | 11 | 401,976 | 391,405 | ||||||
| Accrued liabilities | 194,983 | 303,604 | |||||||
| Due to related parties | 6 | 590,062 | 471,126 | ||||||
| Employee retention allowance | 17 | 570,487 | 602,478 | ||||||
| Current and Total Liabilities | 1,757,508 | 1,768,613 | |||||||
| Commitments | 14 | ||||||||
| Shareholders' Equity | |||||||||
| Share capital | 12 | 76,240,994 | 75,715,014 | ||||||
| Reserves | 8,142,017 | 8,142,017 | |||||||
| Deficit | (58,091,493 | ) | (55,674,246 | ) | |||||
| Total Shareholders' Equity | 26,291,518 | 28,182,785 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | 28,049,026 | 29,951,398 | |||||||
| Common shares | |||||||||
| Authorized | Unlimited | Unlimited | |||||||
| Issued and outstanding | 84,439,732 | 73,439,732 |
| Notes | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||
| $ | $ | ||||||
| Assets | |||||||
| Current Assets | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 154,154 | 256,624 | |||||
Advances receivable and prepaid expenses | 6 | 345,193 | 236,667 | ||||
Due from related parties | 7 | 285,074 | 26,474 | ||||
| Total Current Assets | 784,421 | 519,765 | |||||
| Non-Current Assets | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 8 | 1,269,434 | 527,904 | ||||
Exploration and evaluation assets | 9 | 38,271,725 | 31,623,192 | ||||
Intangible assets | 10 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Total Non-Current Assets | 39,541,159 | 32,151,097 | |||||
| Total Assets | 40,325,580 | 32,670,862 | |||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | |||||||
Current Liabilities | |||||||
Accounts payable | 12 | 1,488,379 | 715,452 | ||||
Accrued liabilities | 83,663 | 221,634 | |||||
Due to related parties | 7 | 67,477 | 284,920 | ||||
Employee retention allowance | 19 | 184,951 | 184,159 | ||||
Lease obligation - current portion | 16 | 138,684 | 188,370 | ||||
Loans - current portion | 13 | 0 | 11,650 | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 1,963,154 | 1,606,185 | |||||
Lease obligation - long-term portion | 16 | 0 | 159,874 | ||||
Loans - long-term portion | 13 | 27,602 | 26,501 | ||||
| Total Liabilities | 1,990,756 | 1,792,560 | |||||
| Shareholders' Equity | |||||||
Share capital | 14 | 94,480,512 | 85,147,700 | ||||
Reserves | 10,787,553 | 8,940,059 | |||||
Deficit | (66,933,241 | ) | (63,209,457 | ) | |||
| Total Shareholders' Equity | 38,334,824 | 30,878,302 | |||||
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | 40,325,580 | 32,670,862 | |||||
| Common shares | |||||||
Authorized | Unlimited | Unlimited | |||||
Issued and outstanding | 14b | 135,099,174 | 112,224,174 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Approved and authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on March 30, 2016.
2022.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors by:
| /s/ | /s/ Arnold T. Kondrat |
| William R. Wilson | Arnold T. Kondrat |
| Director | Director |
PageF-5 ofF-26Going concern (Note 2b)
| For the years ended | ||||||||||||
| Notes | December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Expenses | ||||||||||||
| Consulting, management and professional fees | 92,329 | 105,668 | 233,092 | |||||||||
| Employee benefits | 182,630 | 276,578 | 1,054,627 | |||||||||
| Office and sundry | 70,549 | 262,694 | 366,713 | |||||||||
| Compensation expense-share-based payment | 13 | - | 70,886 | 259,559 | ||||||||
| Travel and promotion | 63,138 | 47,819 | 73,037 | |||||||||
| Depreciation | 22,082 | 33,232 | 35,193 | |||||||||
| Interest and bank expenses | 1,158 | 629 | 3,185 | |||||||||
| Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | 2,300,000 | 2,183,233 | 25,801,443 | |||||||||
| Foreign exchange (gain)/loss | (177,310 | ) | (77,636 | ) | 252,111 | |||||||
| (2,554,576 | ) | (2,903,103 | ) | (28,078,960 | ) | |||||||
| Interest income | 113 | 393 | 41,371 | |||||||||
| OtherIncome | 137,216 | - | - | |||||||||
| Loss before income tax | (2,417,247 | ) | (2,902,710 | ) | (28,037,589 | ) | ||||||
| Income tax recovery | - | - | 813,138 | |||||||||
| Comprehensivelossfortheyear | (2,417,247 | ) | (2,902,710 | ) | (27,224,451 | ) | ||||||
| Loss per share, basic and diluted | 12c | (0.03 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.37 | ) | |||||
Event after the reporting period (Note 22)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page
Loncor |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF |
| LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Expressed in U.S. dollars) |
| Common shares | ||||||||||||||||||
| Notes | Number of | Reserves | Deficit | Total shareholders' | ||||||||||||||
| shares | Amount | equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2013 | 73,439,732 | $ | 75,715,014 | $ | 7,618,203 | $ | (25,547,085 | ) | $ | 57,786,132 | ||||||||
| Loss for the year | - | - | - | (27,224,451 | ) | (27,224,451 | ) | |||||||||||
| Share-based payments | 13 | - | - | 416,985 | - | 416,985 | ||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | 73,439,732 | $ | 75,715,014 | $ | 8,035,188 | $ | (52,771,536 | ) | $ | 30,978,666 | ||||||||
| Loss for the year | - | - | - | (2,902,710 | ) | (2,902,710 | ) | |||||||||||
| Share-based payments | 13 | - | - | 106,829 | - | 106,829 | ||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | 73,439,732 | $ | 75,715,014 | $ | 8,142,017 | $ | (55,674,246 | ) | $ | 28,182,785 | ||||||||
| Loss for the year | - | - | - | (2,417,247 | ) | (2,417,247 | ) | |||||||||||
| Common shares issued | 11,000,000 | 525,980 | - | - | 525,980 | |||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2015 | 84,439,732 | $ | 76,240,994 | $ | 8,142,017 | $ | (58,091,493 | ) | $ | 26,291,518 | ||||||||
| For the year ended | ||||||||||
| Notes | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | |||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Expenses | ||||||||||
Consulting, management and professional fees | 887,058 | 898,831 | 794,481 | |||||||
Employee benefits | 1,097,977 | 555,150 | 358,794 | |||||||
Office and sundry | 232,011 | 128,323 | 68,290 | |||||||
Share-based payments | 14 | 782,815 | 289,665 | 154,789 | ||||||
Travel and promotion | 277,448 | 240,320 | 111,965 | |||||||
Depreciation | 8, 16 | 175,075 | 185,348 | 196,694 | ||||||
Interest and bank expenses | 22,267 | 11,781 | 4,421 | |||||||
Interest on lease obligation | 16 | 9,320 | 21,393 | 35,419 | ||||||
Fair value gain on government loan | 13 | 0 | (5,206 | ) | 0 | |||||
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments | 0 | (31,888 | ) | 30,349 | ||||||
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | 9 | 452,251 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | (44,084 | ) | 49,927 | 11,236 | ||||||
Loss before other items | (3,892,138 | ) | (2,343,644 | ) | (1,766,438 | ) | ||||
| Interest and other income | 6,16, 21 | 168,354 | 100,084 | 115,693 | ||||||
| Loss and comprehensive loss for the year | (3,723,784 | ) | (2,243,560 | ) | (1,650,745 | ) | ||||
| Loss per share, basic and diluted | 14d | (0.03 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||
| Weighted average number of shares - basic and diluted | 14d | 127,374,340 | 105,203,090 | 93,885,097 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
PageF-7 ofF-26
Loncor |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF |
| CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Expressed in U.S. dollars) |
| Notes | December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||||||
| Loss for the year | (2,417,247 | ) | (2,902,710 | ) | (27,224,451 | ) | ||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash used in operating activities | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 23,175 | 33,232 | 35,193 | |||||||||
| Share-based payments - employee compensation | 13 | - | 70,886 | 259,559 | ||||||||
| Share-based payments - consultant fees | 13 | - | - | 2,393 | ||||||||
| Employee retention allowance | 17 | (31,991 | ) | (11,638 | ) | 76,316 | ||||||
| Gain on disposition of capital assets | 7 | - | (4,601 | ) | (1,237 | ) | ||||||
| Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | 2,300,000 | 2,183,233 | 25,801,443 | |||||||||
| Income tax (recovery) expense | - | - | (813,138 | ) | ||||||||
| Changes in non-cash working capital | ||||||||||||
| Advances receivable | (9,035 | ) | 356,857 | (111,285 | ) | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses and deposits | 1,302 | 19,412 | 269,749 | |||||||||
| Due from related parties | (2,739 | ) | 32,066 | (24,186 | ) | |||||||
| Accounts payable | (43,766 | ) | 190,036 | (223,921 | ) | |||||||
| Retention payable | - | (25,238 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | (108,621 | ) | (49,459 | ) | 183,889 | |||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | (288,922 | ) | (107,924 | ) | (1,769,676 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||||||
| Acquisition of property, plant, and equipment | - | - | (197,626 | ) | ||||||||
| Disposition of capital assets | 94,491 | 43,600 | 300 | |||||||||
| Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets | (497,861 | ) | (671,011 | ) | (8,454,857 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (403,370 | ) | (627,411 | ) | (8,652,183 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from share issuance, net of issuance costs | 525,980 | - | - | |||||||||
| Due to related parties | 118,936 | 466,038 | 5,088 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided from financing activities | 644,916 | 466,038 | 5,088 | |||||||||
| Net decrease in cash during the year | (47,376 | ) | (269,297 | ) | (10,416,771 | ) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year | 55,631 | 324,928 | 10,741,699 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year | 8,255 | 55,631 | 324,928 |
| Common shares | Reserves | Deficit | Total shareholders' equity | ||||||||||||
| Number of shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 93,694,956 | $ | 79,376,206 | $ | 8,221,178 | $ | (59,315,152 | ) | $ | 28,282,232 | |||||
| Loss for the year | - | - | - | (1,650,745 | ) | (1,650,745 | ) | ||||||||
| Share-based payments (Note 15) | - | - | 190,469 | - | 190,469 | ||||||||||
| Common shares issued | 1,586,023 | 465,080 | - | - | 465,080 | ||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 95,280,979 | $ | 79,841,286 | $ | 8,411,647 | $ | (60,965,897 | ) | $ | 27,287,036 | |||||
| Loss for the year | - | - | - | (2,243,560 | ) | (2,243,560 | ) | ||||||||
| Share-based payments (Note 15) | - | - | 528,412 | - | 528,412 | ||||||||||
| Common shares issued (Note 14b) | 16,943,195 | 5,306,414 | - | - | 5,306,414 | ||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 112,224,174 | $ | 85,147,700 | $ | 8,940,059 | $ | (63,209,457 | ) | $ | 30,878,302 | |||||
| Loss for the year | - | - | - | (3,723,784 | ) | (3,723,784 | ) | ||||||||
| Common shares issued with warrants (Note 14b) | 19,350,000 | 7,838,542 | 1,024,032 | - | 8,862,574 | ||||||||||
| Issuance costs (Note 14b) | - | (422,780 | ) | - | - | (422,780 | ) | ||||||||
| Warrants exercised (Note 14c) | 2,400,000 | 1,692,211 | (274,013 | ) | - | 1,418,198 | |||||||||
| Stock options exercised (Note 15) | 1,125,000 | 224,839 | (83,589 | ) | - | 141,250 | |||||||||
| Share-based payments (Note 15) | 1,181,064 | - | 1,181,064 | ||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | 135,099,174 | $ | 94,480,512 | $ | 10,787,553 | $ | (66,933,241 | ) | $ | 38,334,824 | |||||
Supplemental cash flow information (Note 16)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page
| For the year ended | ||||||||||
| Notes | December 30, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | |||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||||
| Loss for the year | (3,723,784 | ) | (2,243,560 | ) | (1,650,745 | ) | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash used in operating activities | ||||||||||
| Depreciation | 175,075 | 185,348 | 196,694 | |||||||
| Share-based payments | 15 | 1,172,152 | 450,912 | 519,549 | ||||||
| Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | 9 | 452,251 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Accretion expense on government loan | 13 | 985 | 623 | 0 | ||||||
| Fair value gain on government loan | 0 | (5,062 | ) | 0 | ||||||
| Gain on derivative instruments | 14 | 0 | (31,888 | ) | 30,349 | |||||
| Interest on lease obligation | 16 | 9,320 | 21,393 | 35,419 | ||||||
| Other non-cash adjustments | (1,940 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Changes in non-cash working capital | ||||||||||
| Advances receivable and prepaid expenses | (108,526 | ) | (172,772 | ) | (13,314 | ) | ||||
| Due from related parties | (258,600 | ) | (26,474 | ) | 0 | |||||
| Employee retention allowance | 19 | 792 | 3,640 | 8,652 | ||||||
| Accounts payable | 772,927 | 379,196 | 35,974 | |||||||
| Accrued liabilities | (137,971 | ) | 33,082 | (41,001 | ) | |||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | (1,647,318 | ) | (1,405,562 | ) | (878,423 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired | 4 | 0 | 0 | (97,525 | ) | |||||
| Acquisition of additional interest in subsidiary | 4 | 0 | (140,000 | ) | 0 | |||||
| Acquisition of mineral properties | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | (943,110 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets | (7,072,338 | ) | (2,796,013 | ) | (227,089 | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (8,015,448 | ) | (2,936,013 | ) | (324,614 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from share issuances, net of issuance costs | 10,008,154 | 5,383,914 | 136,000 | |||||||
| Loans received (repaid) | 13 | (11,534 | ) | 15,316 | (12,767 | ) | ||||
| Principal repayment of lease obligation | 16 | (218,880 | ) | (213,183 | ) | (183,342 | ) | |||
| Due to related parties | (217,443 | ) | (665,544 | ) | 689,940 | |||||
| Net cash provided from financing activities | 9,560,297 | 4,520,503 | 629,831 | |||||||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents during the year | (102,470 | ) | 178,928 | (573,206 | ) | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year | 256,624 | 77,696 | 650,902 | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year | 154,154 | 256,624 | 77,696 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information (Note 18)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Loncor ResourcesGold Inc. (the "Company" or "Loncor") is a corporation governed by the OntarioBusiness Corporations Act. In June 2021, the Company changed its name from Loncor Resources Inc. to Loncor Gold Inc. The principal business of the Company is the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties.
These consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 20152021 and 20142020 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2021, 2020 and 20132019 include the accounts of the Company and of its wholly owned subsidiaries in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the “Congo”"Congo"), Loncor Resources Congo Sarl,SARL, and in Canada, Loncor Kilo Inc. Loncor Resources Congo SARL owns 100% of the U.S.common shares of Devon Resources SARL and 100% of Navarro Resources SARL.
Loncor Kilo Inc. owns 84.68% of the outstanding shares of Adumbi Mining S.A. ("Adumbi"), Nevada Bob’s Franchising, Inc., respectively.a company registered in the Congo which changed its name from KGL-Somituri SARL in January 2020, and 100% of the common shares of Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd (a British Virgin Islands company). Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd owns 100% of the shares of Isiro (Jersey) Limited which in turn owns 100% of the shares of KGL Isiro SARL in the Congo.
The Company is a publicly traded company whose outstanding common shares are listed for tradingtrade on the Toronto Stock Exchange, the OTCQX market in the United States and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The head office and principal place of business of the Company is located at 1 First Canadian Place, 100 King St. West, Suite 7070, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada.
2.Basis of Preparation
a) Statement of compliance
These consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 20152021 and 20142020 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 20132019 have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”("IASB").
The accompanying financial information as at December 31, 20152021 and 20142020 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 2013, have2019 has been prepared in accordance with those IASB standards and IFRS Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”("IFRIC") interpretations issued and effective, or issued and early-adopted, at December 31, 2015.2021.
The date the Company’sCompany's Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements was March 30, 2016.2022.
|
b) Going Concern
The Company incurred a net loss of $2,417,247$3,723,784 for the year ended December 31, 20152021 (year ended December 31, 2014:2020 - net loss of $2,902,710)$2,243,560 and year ended December 31, 2019 - net loss of $1,650,745) and as at December 31, 20152021 had a working capital deficit of $1,626,788$1,178,733 (December 31, 2014: $1,600,989)2020: a working capital deficit of $1,086,420).
The Company’sIn March 2020, the World Health Organization declared coronavirus COVID-19 a global pandemic. This contagious disease outbreak, which has continued to spread, and any related adverse public health developments, has adversely affected workforces, economies, and financial markets globally, potentially leading to an economic downturn. It is not possible for the Company to predict the duration or magnitude of the adverse results of the outbreak and its effects on the Company's business or ability to continue operations in the normal course of business is dependent on several factors, including its ability to secure additional funding. raise funds.
Management is exploring all available optionsclosely monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on the Company's business, including the impact on employees, operations, supplies, liquidity and capital resources. In order for the Company to securecontinue as a going concern and fund its operations, the Company will require additional funding, including equityfinancing. The availability of financing will be affected by, among other things, the state of the capital markets considering the impact of COVID-19 and strategic partnerships. In addition, thepartnership arrangements. The recoverability of the amount shown for exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain financing to continue to perform exploration activity or complete the development of the properties where necessary, or alternatively, upon the Company’sCompany's ability to recover its incurred costs through a disposition of its interests, all of which are uncertain.
F-10
Loncor Gold Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts) |
In addition, if the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities, then existing security holders will likely experience dilution, and the incurring of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could require the Company to agree to operating and financial covenants that would restrict its operations. Any failure on its part to raise additional funds on terms favourable to the Company or at all, may require the Company to significantly change or curtail its current or planned operations in order to conserve cash until such time, if ever, that sufficient proceeds from operations are generated, and could result in the Company not taking advantage of other available business opportunities.
In the event the Company is unable to identify recoverable resources, receive the necessary permitting, or arrange appropriate financing, the carrying value of the Company’sCompany's assets and liabilities could be subject to material adjustment. Furthermore, certain market conditions mayThese matters create material uncertainties that cast significant and substantial doubt upon the validity of the going concern assumption.
These consolidated financial statements do not include any additional adjustments to the recoverability and classification of certain recorded asset amounts, classification of certain liabilities and changes to the statements of loss and comprehensive loss that might be necessary if the Company was unable to continue as a going concern.
PageF-9c) Basis ofF-26 measurement
|
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for certain financial assets and liabilities which are presented at fair value, as explained in the accounting policies set out in Note value. These consolidated financial statements have also been prepared on an accrual basis, except for cash flow information.
|
The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently by all group entities and to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements, unless otherwise indicated.
|
|
a)Basis of Consolidation
i.Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries areconsist of entities controlled by the Company. Control exists whenover which the Company is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns as well as ability to offset these returns through the power directly or indirectly, to governdirect the financial and operating policiesrelevant activities of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.the entity. This control is generally evidenced through owning more than 50% of the voting rights or currently exercisable potential voting rights of a company’scompany's share capital. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. Consolidation accounting is applied for all of the Company’sCompany's wholly-owned subsidiaries (see note 4)5).
|
ii.Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Inter-company balances, transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
Unrealized gains arising from transactions with associates are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Company's interest in the investee. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As at December 31, 2021 and (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts) |
b)Use of Estimates and Judgments
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. Information about critical judgments in applying accounting policies and estimates that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements is included in the following notes:
Estimates:
|
i.Impairment
Assets, including property, plant and equipment, and exploration and evaluation assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts exceed their recoverable amounts. TheIf an impairment assessment is required, the assessment of the fair value often requires estimates and assumptions such as discount rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, rehabilitation and restoration costs, future capital requirements and future operating performance. Changes in such estimates could impact recoverable values of these assets. Estimates are reviewed regularly by management.
Pageii.F-10Share-based payment transactions of F-26
|
The applicationCompany measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the Company’s accounting policyequity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for explorationshare-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent on the terms and evaluation expenditureconditions of the grant. This estimate also requires judgment in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits will flowthe most appropriate inputs to the Company, which may be based onvaluation model including the expected life of the stock option, volatility and dividend yield and making assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimatesthem. The assumptions and models used for estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions are disclosed in Note 15.
For warrant-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of the derivative instruments. The assumptions made may change if new information becomes available.and models used for estimating fair value of warrant-based derivative financial instruments are disclosed in Note 14.
Judgments:
i. Provisions and contingencies
The amount recognized as provision, including legal, contractual, constructive and other exposures or obligations, is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the related liability, including any related interest charges, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. In addition, contingencies will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Therefore assessment of contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events. The Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies based upon the best information available, relevant tax laws and other appropriate requirements. As at December 31, 2021 and 2021, the Company does not have any material asset retirement obligations related to its exploration and evaluation assets.
ii. Title to mineral property interests
Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’sCompany's title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.defects, government renegotiation, other legal claims, and non-compliance with regulatory, social and environmental requirements.
iii. Exploration and evaluation expenditure
The application of the Company's accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires significant judgment in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits will flow to the Company, which may be based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimates and assumptions made may change if new information becomes available. There are key circumstances that would indicate a test for impairment is required, which include: the expiry of the right to explore, substantive expenditure on further exploration is not planned, exploration for and evaluation of the mineral resources in the area have not led to discovery of commercially viable quantities, and/or sufficient data exists to show that the carrying amount of the asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale. If information becomes available suggesting impairment, the amount capitalized is written off in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss during the year the new information becomes available.
Significant judgements have been made with regards to the potential for indicators of impairment. This includes judgements related to the ability to carry out the desired exploration activities as a result of various permits currently being under force majeure due to the poor security situation at the North Kivu property and the need to allocate resources amongst different projects based on the availability of capital and funding.
iv. Functional and presentation currency
Judgment is required to determine the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries. These judgments are continuously evaluated and are based on management's experience and knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances.
c)Foreign Currency Translation
i. Functional and presentation currency
These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars (“("$”"), which is the Company’sCompany's functional and presentation currency. The United States dollar was determined to be the functional currency of the Company's Congo subsidiaries. References to Cdn$ represent Canadian dollars.
ii. Foreign currency transactions
The functional currency for each of the Company’sCompany's subsidiaries and any associates is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Transactions entered into by the Company’sCompany's subsidiaries and any associates in a currency other than the currency of the primary economic environment in which they operate (their "functional currency") are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur except depreciation and amortization which are translated at the rates of exchange applicable to the related assets, with any gains or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates of exchange with the resulting gain or losses recognized in the statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using the historical exchange rates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined.
|
d)Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held on call with financial institutions, and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts.
F-13
|
A financial asset is classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), loans and receivables, held to maturity investments (“HTM”), or available for sale financial assets (“AFS”), as appropriate at initial recognition and, except in very limited circumstances, the classification is not changed subsequently. The classification is determined at initial recognition and depends on the nature and purpose of the financial asset. The Company does not have any financial assets that are classified as HTM and AFS. A financial asset is derecognized when contractual rights to the asset’s cash flows expire or if substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset are transferred.
PageF-11 ofF-26
| Loncor |
|
As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, |
| 2019 (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share |
e)Financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets
Initial recognition and measurement
Non-derivative financial assets within the scope of IFRS 9 are classified and measured as "financial assets at FVTPL
Afair value", as either FVPL or FVOCI, and "financial assets at amortized cost", as appropriate. The Company determines the classification of financial asset is classified as FVTPL whenassets at the financial asset is held for trading or it is designated upontime of initial recognition as an FVTPL. Abased on the Company's business model and the contractual terms of the cash flows.
All financial asset is classified as held for trading if (1) it has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term; (2) it is part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Company manages and has an actual pattern of short term profit taking; or (3) it is a derivative that is not designated and effective as a hedging instrument. Financial assets at FVTPL are carried in the consolidated statements of financial positionrecognized initially at fair value plus, in the case of financial assets not at FVPL, directly attributable transaction costs on the trade date at which the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Financial assets with changesembedded derivatives are considered in fair value recognized in profittheir entirety when determining their classification at FVPL or loss. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred.at amortized cost. The Company has classified advance receivable held for collection of contractual cash and cash equivalentsflows as FVTPL.financial assets measured at amortized cost.
Loans and receivablesSubsequent measurement - financial assets at amortized cost
Loans and receivables are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue, and are subsequently carriedAfter initial recognition, financial assets measured at amortized cost less losses for impairment. The impairment lossare subsequently measured at the end of receivables is based on a review of all outstanding amountseach reporting period at period end. Bad debts are written off duringamortized cost using the period in which they are identified.Effective Interest Rate ("EIR") method. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and includesany fees or costs that are an integral part of the effective interest rateEIR.
Subsequent measurement - financial assets at FVPL
Financial assets measured at FVPL include financial assets management intends to sell in the short term and transaction costs. Gainsany derivative financial instrument that is not designated as a hedging instrument in a hedge relationship. Financial assets measured at FVPL are carried at fair value in the consolidated statements of financial position with changes in fair value recognized in other income or expense in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.
Subsequent measurement - financial assets at FVOCI
Financial assets measured at FVOCI are non-derivative financial assets that are not held for trading and the Company has made an irrevocable election at the time of initial recognition to measure the assets at FVOCI. The Company does not measure any financial assets at FVOCI.
After initial measurement, investments measured at FVOCI are subsequently measured at fair value with unrealized gains or losses recognized in other comprehensive income or loss in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. When the investment is sold, the cumulative gain or loss remains in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss and is not reclassified to profit or loss.
Dividends from such investments are recognized in other income in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss when the loansright to receive payments is established.
Derecognition
A financial asset is derecognized when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or the Company no longer retains substantially all the risks and receivablesrewards of ownership.
Impairment of financial assets
The Company's only financial assets subject to impairment are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process.advances receivable, which are measured at amortized cost. The Company has classified advances receivable and balances due from related partieselected to apply the simplified approach to impairment as loans and receivables.
Impairment of financial assets
The Company assesses at each reporting date whether a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or group of financial assets is deemedpermitted by IFRS 9, which requires the expected lifetime loss to be impaired, if, and only if, there is objective evidencerecognized at the time of impairment as a result of one or more events that has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and that event has an impactreceivable. To measure estimated credit losses, advances receivable have been grouped based on shared credit risk characteristics, including the estimated future cash flowsnumber of days past due. An impairment loss is reversed in subsequent periods if the amount of the financial asset orexpected loss decreases and the group of financial assets thatdecrease can be reliably estimated.objectively related to an event occurring after the initial impairment was recognized.
Financial liabilities
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial liabilities are classifiedmeasured at amortized cost, unless they are required to be measured at FVPL as FVTPL,is the case for held for trading or otherderivative instruments, or the Company has opted to measure the financial liability at FVPL. The Company's financial liabilities as appropriate upon initial recognition. Thereinclude accounts payable, accrued liabilities, due to related parties, employee retention allowance, lease obligations, and loans, which are noeach measured at amortized cost. All financial liabilities classified as FVTPL. are recognized initially at fair value and in the case of long-term debt, net of directly attributable transaction costs.
Subsequent measurement - financial liabilities at amortized cost
After initial recognition, financial liabilities measured at amortized cost are subsequently measured at the end of each reporting period at amortized cost using the EIR method. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and any fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR.
Derecognition
A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled or expired.expires with any associated gain or loss recognized in other income or expense in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.
f)Loss Per Share
Financial liabilities classified as other financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to the initial recognition, other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The Company’s other financial liabilities include accounts payable, accrued liabilities, due to related parties and the employee retention allowance.
|
Basic earnings (loss)loss per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss)loss applicable by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings (loss)loss per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss)loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the reporting period and all additional common shares for the assumed exercise of options and warrants outstanding for the reporting period, if dilutive. When the Company is incurring losses, basic and diluted loss per share are the same since including the exercise of outstanding options and share purchase warrants in the diluted loss per share calculation would be anti-dilutive.
PageF-12g) ofF-26Property, Plant and Equipment ("PPE")
|
|
i. Recognition and measurement
Items of PPE are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials, directed labor and any other cost directly attributable to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary to be capable of operating in the manner intended by the Company. When components of an asset have different useful lives, depreciation is calculated on each separate component.
ii. Subsequent costs
The cost of replacing part of an item of PPE is recognized in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the Company and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized and included in net loss. If the carrying amount of the replaced component is not known, it is estimated based on the cost of the new component less estimated depreciation. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.
iii. Depreciation
Depreciation is based on the cost of an asset less its residual value. Significant components of individual assets are assessed to determine whether a component has an estimated useful life that is different from that of the remainder of that asset, in which case that component is depreciated separately. Depreciation is recognized in profit or loss over the estimated useful lives of each item or component of an item of PPE as follows:
- Furniture and fixtures straight line over 4 Years
- Office and communications equipment straight line over 4 Years
- Vehicles straight line over 4 Years
- Field camps and equipment straight line over 4 Years
- Right-of-use assetstraight line over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term
- Leasehold improvements straight line over the lease term
- Buildingsstraight line over 25 Years
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually and adjusted, if appropriate. Depreciation commences when an asset is available for use. Changes in estimates are accounted for prospectively.
|
h)Exploration and Evaluation Assets
All direct costs related to exploration and evaluation of mineral properties, net of incidental revenues and recoveries, are capitalized under exploration and evaluation assets. Exploration and evaluation expenditures include such costs as acquisition of rights to explore; sampling, trenching and surveying costs; costs related to topography, geology, geochemistry and geophysical studies; drilling costs and costs in relation to technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource.
|
Exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred by Barrick Gold (Congo) SARL ("Barrick") under the Farm-in arrangement (See note 9) are recorded on a cost-based approach and accounted in the same way as they would for expenditures directly incurred by the Company as described in the above paragraph. Exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred by Barrick are offset by funding received from Barrick such that no liability arises before an approved pre-feasibility study is completed.
i)Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired by way of an asset acquisition or business combination are recognized if the asset is separable or arises from contractual or legal rights and the fair value can be measured reliably on initial recognition.
On acquisition of a mineral property in the exploration stage, the Company estimates the fair value attributable to the exploration licenses acquired. The Company’sfair value of the exploration license is recorded as an intangible asset as at the date of acquisition. When an exploration stage property moves into development, the acquired exploration potential attributable to that property is transferred to mining interests within PP&E. Intangible assets are subject to impairment testing annually or more frequently should events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired.
j)Impairment of Non-Financial Assets
The Company's PPE, exploration and evaluation assets, and intangible assets are assessed for indication of impairment at each consolidated statementsstatement of financial position date. Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of an exploration and evaluation asset may exceed its recoverable amount. When facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, an entity shall measure, present and disclose any resulting impairment in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Internal factors, such as budgets and forecasts, as well as external factors, such as expected future prices, costs and other market factors are also monitored to determine if indications of impairment exist. If any indication of impairment exists, an estimate of the asset’sasset's recoverable amount is calculated. The recoverable amount is determined as the higher of the fair value less costs to sell for the asset and the asset’sasset's value in use. This is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or the Company’sCompany's assets. If this is the case, the individual assets are grouped together into cash generating units (“CGU”("CGU") for impairment purposes. Such CGUs represent the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash flows from other assets.
If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and an impairment loss is charged to the statements of loss and comprehensive loss so as to reduce the carrying amount to its recoverable amount (i.e., the higher of fair value less cost to sell and value in use). Fair value less cost to sell is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset or CGU in an arm’sarm's length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties, less the costs of disposal. Value in use is determined as the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset or CGU. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using estimated future prices, any mineral reserves and resources and operating and capital costs. All assumptions used are those that an independent market participant would consider appropriate. The estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, the Company recognized an impairment of exploration and evaluation assets for $2,300,000$452,250 (December 31, 20142020 and 2019 - $2,183,233)$NaN) to adjust the carrying value of the assets to their fair value, using a level 3 value in use methodology.
|
k)Income Taxes
Income tax expense consists of current and deferred tax expense. Income tax expense is recognized in the statement of loss and comprehensive (loss) income,loss, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at future anticipated tax rates, which have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax assets and current tax liabilities are only offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off the amounts, and the Company intends to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Deferred taxation is provided on all qualifying temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that the deductible temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognized for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority.
|
l)Share-Based Payments
Equity-settled share-based payments for directors, officers and employees are measured at fair value at the date of grant and recorded as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed over the vesting period based on the Company’sCompany's estimate of options that will eventually vest. The number of forfeitures likely to occur is estimated on grant date and is revised as deemed necessary.
Compensation expense on stock options granted to consultants is measured at the earlier of the completion of performance and the date the options are vested using the fair value method and is recorded as an expense in the same period as if the Company had paid cash for the goods or services received.
PageF-14 ofF-26
When the value of goods or services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value is measured by use of a Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected life used in the model is adjusted, based on management’smanagement's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.
Any consideration paid by directors, officers, employees and consultants on exercise of equity-settled share-based payments is credited to share capital. Shares are issued from treasury upon the exercise of equity-settled share-based instruments.
|
m)Provisions and Contingencies
Provisions are recognized when a legal or constructive obligation exists, as a result of past events, and it is probable that an outflow of resources that can be reliably estimated will be required to settle the obligation. Where the effect is material, the provision is discounted using an appropriate current market-based pre-tax discount rate. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognized as interest expense.
When a contingency substantiated by confirming events, can be reliably measured and is likely to result in an economic outflow, a liability is recognized as the best estimate required to settle the obligation. A contingent liability is disclosed where the existence of an obligation will only be confirmed by future events, or where the amount of a present obligation cannot be measured reliably or will likely not result in an economic outflow. Contingent assets are only disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable. When the economic benefit becomes virtually certain, the asset is no longer contingent and is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
|
n)Related Party Transactions
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operating decisions. Parties are also considered to be related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities. A transaction is considered to be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties. Related party transactions are in the normal course of business and have commercial substance.
|
o)Decommisioning obligations
The Company recognizes an estimate of the liabilities associated with decommissioning obligations when it has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made. The estimated fair value of the decommissioning obligations is recorded as a long-term liability, with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset. The capitalized amount is amortized over the estimated life of the asset. The liability amount is increased each reporting period due to the passage of time and the amount of accretion is charged to any earnings in the period. The decommissioning obligations are charged against the decommissioning obligations to the extent of the liability recorded. The Company has reviewed newno material decommissioning obligations as at December 31, 2021 and revised2020.
F-18
Loncor Gold Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts) |
p)Business Combination
On the acquisition of a business, the Company uses the acquisition method of accounting, pronouncementswhereby the purchase consideration is allocated to the identifiable assets and liabilities on the basis of fair value at the date of acquisition. Incremental costs related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred. When the cost of the acquisition exceeds the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired, the difference is recorded as goodwill. If the fair value attributable to the Company's share of the identifiable net assets exceeds the cost of acquisition, the difference is recognized as a gain in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.
q)Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company reviews the terms of its equity instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether or not there are embedded derivative instruments that are required to be accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. The deriviative financial instrument is presumed to be classified as a derivative financial liability unless it meets all the criteria to recognize as equity instrument under IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation. One of the criteria is that the conversion option exchanges a fixed amount of shares for a fixed amount of cash ("fixed for fixed"). For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to profit or loss. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of the derivative instruments. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether or not such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed.
r)Employee retention allowance
The Company previously had an incentive employee retention policy under which an amount equal to one month salary per year of service was accrued to each qualified employee up to a maximum of 10 months (or 10 years of service with the Company and/or a related company). To qualify for this retention allowance, an employee was required to complete two years of service with the Company and/or a related company. The full amount of retention allowance accumulated by a particular employee is paid out when the employee is no longer employed with the Company, unless other arrangements are made or unless there is a termination due to misconduct, in which case the retention allowance is forfeited. While the retention allowance policy was discontinued by the Company effective December 31, 2017, the retention allowance amounts accrued up to December 31, 2017 remain recorded as a liability in the Company's consolidated statement of financial position. There is uncertainty about the timing and amount of these potential retention allowance payments.
s)Right-of-use assets and lease obligation
Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of right-of-use assets includes the initial amount of lease liabilities recognized, initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received.
Unless the Company is reasonably certain to obtain ownership of the leased asset at the end of the lease term, the right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life and the lease term. Right-of-use assets are subject to impairment.
At the commencement date of the lease, the Company recognizes a lease liability measured at the present value of lease payments to be made over the lease term, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Company's incremental borrowing rate.
After the commencement date, the amount of the lease liability is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made. In addition, the carrying amount of the lease liability is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the fixed lease payments or a change in the assessment to purchase the underlying asset.
The Company presents right-of-use assets in the property, plant and equipment line item on the consolidated statements of financial position and the lease liability in the lease obligation line item on the consolidated statements of financial position.
Short-term leases and leases of low value assets
The Company does not recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases that have been issued buta lease term of 12 months or less and do not contain a purchase option or for leases related to low value assets. Lease payments on short-term leases and leases of low value assets are not yet effectiverecognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of loss and determinedcomprehensive loss.
Sub-leases
The Company recognizes payments received from the sub-lease arrangements as lease income while retaining the right-of-use assets and the lease liability in its consolidated statements of financial position.
t)Government Grants
Government loan programs often include conditions that borrowers must meet throughout the term of the loan. Borrowers should recognize a government grant when there is reasonable assurance that they will meet the conditions attached to it and will receive the funds.
A borrower may receive a loan from the government that, if certain conditions are met, all or a portion of the loan will be forgiven. If there is reasonable assurance that the followingborrower will meet the terms for the forgiveness of the loan, the loan is treated as a government grant in accordance with IAS 20. Otherwise, the loan should be accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9.
In other programs, a borrower may havereceive a below-market interest rate loan from the government. A below-market interest loan is initially recognized at its fair value plus or minus any transaction costs inaccordance with IFRS 9. The interest rate differential, measured as the difference between the initial carrying value of the loan and the proceeds received, is treated as a government grant and accounted for in accordance with IAS 20.
u)New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements
On January 23, 2020, the IASB issued an impactamendment to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements providing a more general approach to the classification of liabilities. The amendment clarifies that the classification of liabilities as current or noncurrent depends on the Company: IFRS 9, Financialrights existing at the end of the reporting period as opposed to the expectations of exercising the right for settlement of the liability. The amendments further clarify that settlement refers to the transfer of cash, equity instruments, (“IFRS 9”) was issued byother assets, or services to the IASB on July 24, 2014 and will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
IFRS 9 is intended to reduce the complexity for the classification, measurement, and impairment of financial instruments.counterparty. The mandatoryamendments are effective date is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.2023 and are to be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluatingassessing the financial impact of this standardthe amendment on its consolidated financial statements.
F-20
Loncor Gold Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts) |
IAS 16 - Property, Plant and Equipment
AnOn May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment to prohibit deducting from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment, any proceeds from selling items produced while bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. The proceeds from selling such items, and the cost of producing those items are to be recognized in profit and loss. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, Presentation of Financial Statements (“IAS 1”) was issued by the IASB in December 2014.2022 with early adoption permitted. The amendment clarifies principlesis to be applied retrospectively only to items of property, plant and equipment that are brought to the location and condition necessary for them to be capable of operating in the presentation and materiality consideration formanner intended by management on or after the earliest period presented in the financial statements in the year in which the amendments are first applied. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.
IAS 37 - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and notes to improve understandability and comparability. TheContingent Assets
On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets to specify which costs an entity includes in determining the cost of fulfilling a contract for the purpose of assessing whether the contract is onerous. The amendment specifies that the cost of fulfilling a contract comprises the costs that relate directly to the contract. Costs that relate directly to the contract can either be incremental costs of fulfilling the contract or an allocation of other costs that relate directly to fulfilling contracts. The amendments are effective for contracts for which the Company has not yet fulfilled all its obligations on or after January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments
On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments clarifying which fees to include in the test in assessing whether to derecognize a financial liability. Only those fees paid or received between the borrower and the lender, including fees paid or received by either the entity or the lender on the other's behalf are included. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016.2022 with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluatingassessing the financial impact of this standardthe amendment on its consolidated financial statements.
PageF-154.Acquisitions
Loncor Kilo Inc.
On September 27, 2019, the Company closed certain transactions provided for by an agreement (the "Agreement") entered into by the Company with Resolute (Treasury) Pty Ltd ("Resolute"), Kilo Goldmines Ltd. ("KGL") and Kilo Goldmines Inc. ("Kilo Inc.", and together with KGL, "Kilo"), and which resulted in the Company acquiring Kilo Inc. Pursuant to the Agreement, (a) Resolute assigned to the Company, for nominal consideration, all ofF-26 Resolute's rights under a secured cash advance facility (the "Facility") which Resolute had made available to Kilo (including Resolute's rights under the security provided by Kilo in respect of the Facility (the "Security")), (b) Kilo consented to the said assignment of the Facility (including the Security) from Resolute to the Company, and (c) following implementation of the said assignment, the Company exercised its rights under the Security (the "Security Enforcement") as a secured creditor to realize on all of the outstanding shares of Kilo Inc., in full satisfaction of all amounts owing under the Facility (prior to the Security Enforcement, Kilo Inc. was a wholly-owned subsidiary of KGL). In the Agreement, Kilo agreed to cooperate with and assist the Company in the Security Enforcement and for such cooperation and assistance, the Company paid $98,124 (Cdn$130,000) to KGL.
Upon the Company completing the Security Enforcement, Kilo Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, such that the Company now holds, through Kilo Inc., Kilo Inc.'s mineral projects in the Congo (these mineral projects then consisted of a 71.25% interest in the Adumbi properties (the Company now holds a 84.68% interest in the Adumbi properties) and a 49% interest in the Isiro properties (the Company now holds a 100% interest in the Isiro properties), which are all located in the Ngayu gold belt in northeastern Congo near Loncor's existing Ngayu properties). See Notes 9(e) and 9(f).
F-21
Loncor |
|
As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, |
| 2019 (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share |
|
The acquisition of Kilo Inc. has been recorded as a business combination under IFRS 3 Business Combinations.The total consideration has been allocated to the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired as follows:
| Total consideration: | |||
| Cash consideration | $ | 98,124 | |
| Purchase Price | $ | 98,124 | |
| Fair value of assets and liabilities: | |||
| Cash and cash equivalent | $ | 599 | |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | $ | 223,346 | |
| Exploration and Evaluation Assets | $ | 175,446 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | (301,267 | ) |
| Fair value of net assets acquired | $ | 98,124 |
In March 2020, the Company acquired an additional 5.04% interest in Adumbi pursuant to a private transaction with one of the former minority shareholders of Adumbi for total consideration of $140,000. This acquisition increased the Company's interest in Adumbi from 71.25% to 76.29%. In September 2020, Adumbi was restructured as per the requirements of the OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) Uniform Act relating to commercial companies. The restructuring resulted in the Company increasing its interest in Adumbi Mining to 84.68%, minority shareholders holding 5.32% and the Congo 10%. The Congo was allocated 10% in accordance with the requirements of the new Congo Mining Code enacted in 2018. Also as a result of the restructuring, Adumbi Mining now operates as "Adumbi Mining S.A." rather than Adumbi Mining SARL.
Devon and Navarro
In June 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Devon Resources SARL (Devon), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Congo, for total consideration comprising:
a)The issuance by the Company of 500,000 common shares of the Company valued at Cdn$100,000
b)The payment of $75,000 in cash
c)The payment of $190,000 in satisfaction of an outstanding loan provided by Devon to the Company.
Also, in June 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Navarro Resources SARL (Navarro), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Congo, for a total purchase price of $300,000, paid for by the settlement of a $300,000 loan provided by the Company to Navarro (see note 9).
Both acquisitions have been treated as a purchase of assets for accounting purposes as the requirements for business combinations under IFRS 3 Business Combination had not been met.
5.Subsidiaries
The following table lists the Company’sCompany's direct and indirect subsidiaries:
| Name of Subsidiary | Place of Incorporation | Proportion of Ownership Interest | Direct/Indirect | Principal Activity |
| Loncor Resources Congo SARL | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 100% | Direct | Mineral Exploration |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 100% | Indirect | Mineral Exploration | |
| Navarro Resources SARL | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 100% | Indirect | Mineral Exploration |
| Loncor Kilo Inc. | 100% | Mineral Exploration | ||
| Adumbi Mining S.A. | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 84.68% | Indirect | Mineral Exploration |
| KGL Isiro Atlantic Ltd | British Virgin Islands | 100% | Indirect | Mineral Exploration |
| Isiro (Jersey) Limited | Jersey | 100% | Indirect | Mineral Exploration |
| KGL Isiro SARL | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 100% | Indirect | Mineral Exploration |
|
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||
| Advances receivable | $ | 42,000 | $ | 32,965 |
6.Advances receivable and prepaid expenses
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||
| Supplier prepayments and deposits | 206,858 | 90,928 | ||||
| Loan to KGL and accrued interest | 60,543 | 56,199 | ||||
| Other receivables and employee advances | 19,037 | 22,997 | ||||
| Harmonized Sales Tax receivable | 58,755 | 66,543 | ||||
| $ | 345,193 | $ | 236,667 |
The balanceIn connection with the Kilo Agreement (Note 4), the Company provided to Kilo Goldmines Ltd. an unsecured loan in the principal amount of $42,000 pertains to advances to employees$51,272 (Cdn$65,000) bearing interest of 8% per annum and suppliersrepayable on demand. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the interest accrued on the loan was $9,271 (December 31, 20142020 - $32,965)$5,147).
|
Other receivables and employee advances of $19,037, are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand (December 31, 2020 - $22,997).
For the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company received $111,535 (2020 and 2019 - $nil) of Harmanized Sales Tax refunds from prior years' reassessments. This is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.
7.Related party transactions
Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation, and are not disclosed in this note.
F-23
a)Key Management Remuneration
Key management includes directors (executive and non-executive), the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”("CEO"), the Chief Financial Officer, and the senior executives reporting directly to the CEO. The remuneration of the key management of the Company as defined above, during the years ended December 31, 2015,2021, December 31, 20142020 and December 31, 20132019 was as follows:
| For the year ended | |||||||||
| December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||
| Salaries | $ | 145,067 | $ | 168,000 | $ | 830,345 | |||
| Employee retention allowance | $ | 9,090 | $ | 14,000 | $ | 62,305 | |||
| Compensation expense-share-based payments | $ | - | $ | 59,060 | $ | 226,110 | |||
| $ | 154,157 | $ | 241,060 | $ | 1,118,760 |
|
| For the year ended | |||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | |||||||
| Salaries and bonus | $ | 938,542 | $ | 542,558 | $ | 376,386 | |||
| Compensation expense-share-based payments | $ | 724,035 | $ | 188,601 | $ | 122,999 | |||
| $ | 1,662,577 | $ | 731,159 | $ | 499,385 | ||||
b)Other Related Party Transactions
As at December 31, 2015,2021, an amount of $12,619 was due from Delrand Resources Limited, a company with common directors, related to common expenses in the Congo (December 31, 2014 - $9,880).
As at December 31, 2015, an amount of $527,826$67,477 relating to advances provided to the Company was due to Arnold Kondrat ("Mr. Kondrat"), the Executive Chairman and a director and officer of the Company (December 31, 20142020 - $416,063)$279,154 related to salary and advances to the Company). Total amount paid to Mr. Kondrat for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $500,000 (2020 and 2019 - $242,497 and $90,444, respectively).
As at December 31, 2014,2021, an amount of $30,668$216,148 was due from Gentor Resources Inc. (a company with common directors) related to Banro Corporation, acommon expenses (December 31, 2020 - $26,474 ).
As at December 31, 2021, an amount of $68,926 was due from KGL Resources Ltd. (a company with a common director,officer) related to common expenses (December 31, 2020 - $5,766 was due to KGL resources Ltd.).
The amounts included in the Congo. As of January 1, 2015, Banro Corporation is no longer considered adue to or from related party.party are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are payable on demand.
PageF-16 ofF-26The Company's property, plant and equipment are summarized as follows:
| Furniture & fixtures | Office & Communication equipment | Vehicles | Land and Building | Field camps and equipment | Right-of-use asset | Leasehold improvements | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||
| Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2020 | 151,786 | 28,190 | 11,708 | 217,617 | 221,375 | 739,106 | 84,906 | 1,454,688 | ||||||||||||||||
Additions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Disposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (51,149 | ) | 0 | (51,149 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 151,786 | 28,190 | 11,708 | 217,617 | 221,375 | 687,957 | 84,906 | 1,403,539 | ||||||||||||||||
Additions | 0 | 1,232 | 0 | 125,911 | 815,967 | 0 | 0 | 943,110 | ||||||||||||||||
Disposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Revaluation of asset | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | 151,786 | 29,422 | 11,708 | 343,528 | 1,037,342 | 687,957 | 84,906 | 2,346,649 | ||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2020 | 141,866 | 22,605 | 11,708 | 2,985 | 216,636 | 192,810 | 84,906 | 673,516 | ||||||||||||||||
Additions | 1,839 | 2,528 | 0 | 11,938 | 3,964 | 181,850 | 0 | 202,119 | ||||||||||||||||
Disposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 143,705 | 25,133 | 11,708 | 14,923 | 220,600 | 374,660 | 84,906 | 875,635 | ||||||||||||||||
Additions | 1,501 | 3,529 | 0 | 11,938 | 15,663 | 170,889 | 0 | 203,520 | ||||||||||||||||
Disposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustment | 0 | (1,940 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1,940 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | 145,206 | 26,722 | 11,708 | 26,861 | 236,263 | 545,549 | 84,906 | 1,077,215 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2020 | 9,920 | 5,585 | 0 | 214,632 | 4,739 | 546,296 | 0 | 781,172 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2020 | 8,081 | 2,414 | 2,414 | 2,414 | 2,414 | 2,414 | 2,414 | 527,904 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2021 | 6,580 | 2,700 | 0 | 316,667 | 801,079 | 142,408 | 0 | 1,269,434 |
F-24
Loncor |
|
As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, |
| 2019 (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share |
As at December 31, 2015, an amount of $62,236 was due to Gentor Resources Inc., a company with common directors, related to common expenses (December 31, 2014 - $24,395).
| December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||
| $ | $ | |||||
| Due from related party | 12,619 | 9,880 | ||||
| Due to related parties | 590,062 | 471,126 |
The amounts included in the due from/to related party are non-interest bearing and are payable within 12 months.
|
The Company’s property, plant and equipment are summarized as follows:
| Office & | Field camps | |||||||||||||||||
| Furniture & | Communication | Vehicles | and | Leasehold | Total | |||||||||||||
| fixtures | equipment | equipment | improvements | |||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
| Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2014 | 160,601 | 213,519 | 410,841 | 699,657 | 84,906 | 1,569,524 | ||||||||||||
| Additions | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | (197,481 | ) | - | - | (197,481 | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | 160,601 | 213,519 | 213,360 | 699,657 | 84,906 | 1,372,043 | ||||||||||||
| Additions | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Disposals | (8,815 | ) | (110,827 | ) | (201,653 | ) | (274,654 | ) | - | (595,949 | ) | |||||||
| Balance at September 30, 2015 | 151,786 | 102,692 | 11,707 | 425,003 | 84,906 | 776,094 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2014 | 121,837 | 172,559 | 354,632 | 433,664 | 42,346 | 1,125,038 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation for the year | 7,190 | 33,852 | 16,151 | 130,069 | 24,320 | 211,582 | ||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | (157,423 | ) | - | - | (157,423 | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | 129,027 | 206,411 | 213,360 | 563,733 | 66,666 | 1,179,197 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation for the year | 5,329 | 4,947 | - | 76,931 | 18,240 | 105,448 | ||||||||||||
| Disposals | (5,107 | ) | (109,524 | ) | (201,653 | ) | (274,342 | ) | - | (590,625 | ) | |||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2015 | 129,249 | 101,834 | 11,707 | 366,323 | 84,906 | 694,019 | ||||||||||||
| Carrying amounts | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | 31,574 | 7,108 | - | 135,924 | 18,240 | 192,846 | ||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2015 | 22,537 | 858 | - | 58,680 | - | 82,075 |
During the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, depreciation in the amount of $82,272$28,445 (year ended December 31, 20142020 - $178,350$16,771, year ended December 31, 2019 - $4,878) was capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets.
|
| Notes | North Kivu | Ngayu | Total | |||||||||
| Cost | ||||||||||||
| Balance as at January 1, 2014 | 9,786,202 | 20,957,256 | 30,743,458 | |||||||||
| Additions | 137,799 | 742,903 | 880,702 | |||||||||
| Impairment loss | - | (2,183,233 | ) | (2,183,233 | ) | |||||||
| Balance as at December 31, 2014 | $ | 9,924,001 | $ | 19,516,926 | $ | 29,440,927 | ||||||
| Additions | 22,481 | 522,822 | 545,303 | |||||||||
| Impairment loss | - | (2,300,000 | ) | (2,300,000 | ) | |||||||
| Balance as at December 31, 2015 | $ | 9,946,482 | $ | 17,739,748 | $ | 27,686,230 |
| North Kivu | Ngayu | Imbo | Total | |||||||||
| Cost | ||||||||||||
| Balance as at January 1, 2020 | $ | 10,440,729 | $ | 17,454,831 | $ | 254,283 | $ | 28,149,843 | ||||
Additions | 180,637 | 4,279,656 | 2,760,307 | 7,220,600 | ||||||||
Adjustment | 0 | 0 | (81,685 | ) | (81,685 | ) | ||||||
Earn-in Barrick payment (*) | 0 | (4,267,816 | ) | 0 | (4,267,816 | ) | ||||||
| Balance as at December 31, 2020 | $ | 10,621,366 | $ | 17,466,671 | $ | 2,932,905 | $ | 31,020,942 | ||||
Additions | 0 | 2,216,038 | 6,859,907 | 9,075,945 | ||||||||
Earn-in Barrick payment (*) | 0 | (1,975,162 | ) | 0 | (1,975,162 | ) | ||||||
| Balance as at December 31, 2021 | $ | 10,621,366 | $ | 17,707,547 | $ | 9,792,812 | $ | 38,121,725 |
There is $150,000 of intangible exploration and evaluation expenditures as at December 31, 2015.2021 (December 31, 2020 - $602,250).These Intangible exploration and evaluation assets are in relation to mineral rights acquired with respect to the Ngayu properties ($150,000). The Devon ($152,250) and Navarro ($300,000) properties were fully impaired as at December 31, 2021 as the Company does not intend to utilize the exploration permits. The intangibles have not been included in the table above. There have not been any additions or disposals
The Company's exploration and evaluation assets are subject to renewal of intangible assets since January 1, 2014.the underlying permits and rights and government royalties.
|
a.North Kivu
The North Kivu project is situated in the North Kivu Province in eastern Congo to the northwest of Lake Edward and consists of 49various exploration permits. All of these exploration permits covering 13,375 square kilometres. Historical data has been compiled fromare currently under force majeure due to the colonial period and outlined ten gold prospectspoor security situation, affecting the Company's ability to carry out the desired exploration activities. The duration of the event of force majeure is added to the time limit for follow-up,execution of obligations under the most prospective being the Manguredjipa prospect where 300,000 ounces of alluvial gold was mined during the colonial period. Other gold prospects warranting follow up include Lutunguru, Lubero, Makwasu, Lutela, Bilolo, Manzia, Mohanga and Ludjulu.permits. Exploration estimates to date have not advanced to the stage of being able to identify the quantity of possible resources available for potential mining. Under force majeure, the Company has no tax payment obligations and does not lose tenure of mining titles until force majeure is lifted.
|
b.Ngayu
The Ngayu project covers an areaconsists of 2,077 square kilometresvarious exploration permits and is found within the OrientaleTshopo Province in the northeast of the Congo, approximately 270 kilometers northeast of Kisangani. The Ngayu project covers mostpart of the Ngayu Archaean greenstone belt which is one of a number of greenstone belts in the north-east Congo Archaeancraton that includes the Kilo and Moto greenstone belts. These Archaean greenstone belts are the northwestern extensions of the Lake Victoria greenstone belt terrain that hosts a number of world class gold deposits including Geita and Bulyanhulu.
DueIn 2015, due to a decrease in gold prices coupled with the reduction of the exploration budget, the Company conducted an impairment analysis whereby the carrying value of the Ngayu exploration and evaluation asset as at December 31, 2015 was assessed.assessed for possible impairment. The asset’sasset's recoverable amount was calculated applying a fair value of $15 (December 31, 2014 - $17) per ounce of gold in the ground, which was provided by a valuation analysis of an independent report on similar African exploration companies, to the Ngayu project’sproject's Makapela estimated mineral resource. Since the carrying value of the asset was determined to be higher than its recoverable amount, an impairment loss of $2,300,000 (December 31, 2014 - $2,183,233) was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015. As at December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company conducted an analysis of various factors and determined that there was no further impairment recognized by IFRS 6, and no evidence to support an impairment reversal. As at December 31, 2021, the Company determined that no impairment charge or gain was required.
F-25
c.Devon
The Company’sDevon properties consisted of three (3) exploration permits situated in the province of Haut-Uele in north eastern Congo. The Company has decided not to renew these exploration permits upon expiry in September 2023.
d.Navarro
The Navarro properties consisted of six (6) exploration permits situated in the provinces of Ituri and Haut-Uele in north eastern Congo, which the Company has decided not to renew upon expiry in April 2023.
e.Adumbi
The Adumbi (previously KGL-Somituri, See Note 4) properties consist of six (6) mining licenses valid until 2039 and which cover an area of 361 square kilometers within the Archaean Ngayu Greenstone Belt in the Ituri and Haut Uele provinces in north eastern Congo. The Company's interest in the Adumbi properties was acquired in September 2019 through the agreement with Resolute, KGL and Kilo Inc. (see Note 4). The six mining licenses (Exploitation permits)
are registered in the name of Adumbi, a company incorporated under the laws of the Congo in which the Company holds a 84.68% interest and the minority partners hold 15.32% (including 10% free carried interest owned by the government of the Congo). See Note 4.
Under an agreement signed in April 2010 with the minority partners of Adumbi, the Company's subsidiary Loncor Kilo Inc. agreed to finance all activities of Adumbi, until the filing of a bankable feasibility study, by way of loans which bear interest at the rate of 5% per annum. Within thirty days of the receipt of a bankable feasibility study, the minority partners may collectively elect to exchange their equity participation for either a 2% net smelter royalty, or a 1% net smelter royalty plus an amount equal to 2 Euros per ounce of proven mineral reserves.
f.Isiro
The Isiro properties consist of eleven (11) exploration permits registered in the name of KGL-Isiro SARL and covering an area of 1,884 square kilometers in the province of Haut Uele, in north eastern Congo. The Company owns through Loncor Kilo Inc. 100% of the common shares of Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd. Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd owns 100% of the shares of Isiro (Jersey) Limited, which in turn owns 100% of the shares in KGL-Isiro SARL (a company registered in the Congo).
The KGL Isiro SARL permits were put under force majeure with effect from February 14, 2014 pending resolution of a court action involving these properties and their expiry is extended by the period of force majeure.
10.Intangible Assets
The Company's intangible assets includeincluded certain licenses and rights. Based on management’smanagement's assessment, these intangible assets have been valued at $NaN (2020 - $1). During the year ended December 31, 2021 an impairment charge of $1 as their fair value is nominal.was recorded against these intangible assets.
|
11.Segmented Reporting
The Company has one operating segment: the acquisition, exploration and development of precious metal projects located in the Congo. The operations of the Company are located in two geographic locations, Canada and the Congo. Geographic segmentation of non-current assets is as follows:
PageF-18 of
F-26
Loncor |
|
As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, |
| 2019 (Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share |
December 31, 2015
| Property, plant and | Exploration and | ||||||||
| equipment | Intangible assets | evaluation | |||||||
| Congo | $ | 61,306 | - | $ | 27,836,230 | ||||
| Canada | $ | 20,769 | $ | 1 | - | ||||
| $ | 82,075 | $ | 1 | $ | 27,836,230 |
December 31, 2014
| Property, plant and | Exploration and | ||||||||
| equipment | Intangible assets | evaluation | |||||||
| Congo | $ | 148,901 | - | $ | 29,590,927 | ||||
| Canada | $ | 43,945 | $ | 1 | - | ||||
| $ | 192,846 | $ | 1 | $ | 29,590,927 |
|
| December 31, 2021 | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | Intangible assets | Exploration and evaluation | |||||||
| Congo | $ | 1,118,622 | 0 | $ | 38,271,725 | ||||
| Canada | $ | 150,812 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| $ | 1,269,434 | 0 | $ | 38,271,725 | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | Intangible assets | Exploration and evaluation | |||||||
| Congo | $ | 205,189 | 0 | $ | 31,623,192 | ||||
| Canada | $ | 322,715 | $ | 1 | 0 | ||||
| $ | 527,904 | $ | 1 | $ | 31,623,192 | ||||
12.Accounts Payable
The following table summarizes the Company’sCompany's accounts payable:
| December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||
| Exploration and evaluation expenditures | $ | 253,837 | $ | 199,500 | ||
| Non-exploration and evaluation expenditures | $ | 148,139 | $ | 191,905 | ||
| Total Accounts Payable | $ | 401,976 | $ | 391,405 |
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||
| Exploration and evaluation expenditures | $ | 1,005,260 | $ | 417,566 | ||
| Non-exploration and evaluation expenditures | $ | 483,119 | $ | 297,886 | ||
| Total Accounts Payable | $ | 1,488,379 | $ | 715,452 |
13.Loans
a) In June 2018, as part of the closing of the acquisition of Devon, the Company issued an unsecured non-interest bearing note in the amount $265,000, payable on demand, in satisfaction of the non-share component of the consideration for the Devon acquisition. As at December 31, 2021, the balance of $nil was outstanding (December 31, 2020 - $11,650).
b) In May 2020, the Company received a $29,352 (Cdn$40,000) line of credit ("CEBA LOC") with Toronto-Dominion Bank under the Canada Emergency Business Account ("CEBA") program funded by the Government of Canada. The CEBA LOC is non-interest bearing, can be repaid at any time without penalty.
On January 1, 2021, the outstanding balance of the CEBA LOC automatically converted to a 2-year interest free term loan ("CEBA Term Loan"). The CEBA Term Loan may be repaid at any time without notice or the payment of any penalty. If 75% of the CEBA Term Loan is repaid on or before December 31, 2022, the repayment of the remining 25% of such CEBA Term Loan shall be forgiven. If on December 31, 2022, the Compny exercises the option for a 3-year extension, 5% interest during the term extension period will aply on any balance remaining.
The Company recorded the CEBA LOC upon initial recognition at its fair value of $24,146 (Cdn$32,906) using an effective interest rate of 3.45%. The difference of $5,206 (Cdn$7,094) between the fair value and the total amount of CEBA LOC received has been recorded as a fair value gain on loans advanced in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. During the year ended December 31, 2021, interest of $985 (Cdn$1,252) has been accreted on the CEBA LOC and is included within "interest and bank expenses" in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss (years ended December 31, 2020: $623 and 2019 - $NaN).
As at December 31, 2021, the CEBA LOC is valued at $27,602 (Cdn$34,992) (December 31, 2020 - $26,501 (Cdn$33,741)).
F-27
14.Share Capital
a)Authorized
The authorized share capital of the Company consists of unlimited number of common shares and unlimited number of preference shares, issuable in series, with no par value. All shares issued are fully paid.
The holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of the shareholders of the Company and shall have one vote for each common share held at all meetings of shareholders of the Company, except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares are entitled to vote separately as a class or series. Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the preference shares or any other share ranking senior to the common shares, the holders of the common shares are entitled to (a) receive any dividend as and when declared by the board of directors, out of the assets of the Company properly applicable to payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the board of directors may from time to time determine, and (b) receive the remaining property of the Company in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.
The Company may issue preference shares at any time and from time to time in one or more series with designations, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions fixed by the board of directors. The preference shares of each series are ranked on parity with the preference shares of every series and are entitled to priority over the common shares and any other shares of the Company ranking junior to the preference shares, with respect to priority in payment of dividends and the return of capital and the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.
b)Issued share capital The following table summarizes the Company issued common shares:
F-28 In September 2019, the Company issued 54,326 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.39 per share as the consideration for certain consulting services rendered by a third party. Also in September 2019, all of the Company's common shares issued and outstanding were consolidated on the basis of one common share of the Company for every 2 (two) existing common shares. All of the share, stock option and warrant amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the said share consolidation. In October and in December 2019, the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share and 31,697 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.375 per share, respectively, as the consideration for certain consulting services rendered by third parties. Also in December 2019, warrants to purchase 500,000 common shares of the Company were exercised at a price of Cdn$0.36 per share for gross proceeds of $136,000 (Cdn$180,000). In February In In July and August 2020, the Company closed, in two tranches, a In September 2020, the Company issued 20,640 common shares at a price of Cdn$ In February 2021, the Company completed, in two tranches, a private placement of a total of 11,500,000 units of the Company In March 2021, stock options to purchase a total of 1,050,000 common shares In June 2021, warrants to purchase 600,000 common shares of the Company were exercised for gross proceeds of $363,600 (Cdn$450,000). In July 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement In October 2021, stock options to purchase 75,000 common shares In December 2021, warrants to purchase 1,800,000 common shares of the Company were exercised for gross proceeds of $1,054,598 (Cdn$1,350,000) As of December 31,
c)Common share purchase warrants The following table summarizes the Company's common share purchase warrants outstanding as at December 31, 2021:
As at December 30, 2021, the Company had 7,984,241 outstanding common share purchase warrants (December 31, 2020 - 537,000). During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 9,674,999 common share purchase warrants and 268,242 finder warrants in connection with the February 2021 and July 2021 private placement financings. In June and December 2021, 2,400,000 warrants were execised at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 537,000 finder warrants in connection with the July and August 2020 private placement financing. 96,000 warrants were cancelled during the year ended December 31, 2021 and no warrants were forfeited or cancelled for year ended December 31, 2020. The value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes model and the assumptions at grant date and period end date were as follows: (i) Risk-free interest rate: 0.17% - 0.39%, which is based on the Bank of Canada benchmark bonds yield 2 year rate in effect at the time of grant for bonds with maturity dates at the estimated term of the warrants (ii) Expected volatility: 69.23% - 92.15%, which is based on the Company's historical stock prices (iii) Expected life: 1 - 2 year (iv) Expected dividends: $NaN d)Loss per share Basic and diluted loss per share was calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31,
15.Share-Based Payments The Company has an incentive Stock Option Plan under which non-transferable options to purchase common shares of the Company may be granted to directors, officers, employees or consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. No amounts are paid or payable by the recipient on receipt of the option, and the exercise of the options granted is not dependent on any performance-based criteria. In accordance with these programs, options are exercisable at a price not less than the last closing price of the shares at the grant date. Under this Stock Option Plan, unless otherwise determined by the board at the time of the granting of the options, 25% of the options granted vest on each of the 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month
During the year ended December 31, During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $251,527 representing the vesting of fair value at the date of grant of stock options previously granted to consultants, which was recorded under consulting, management and professional fees in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss (year ended December 31, 2020 - $135,876 ; year ended December 31, 2019 - $41,694). In addition, an amount of
Lease The Company has F-31 Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted IFRS 16 to its accounting policy and recognized a right-of-use asset and a lease liability of $739,106 (Cdn $1,008,331) for its office lease agreement. On July 1, 2020 the right-of-use-asset was revalued at $687,957 (Cdn $932,123). The right-of-use asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The discount rate used to revalue the lease liability was 3.45%. As at December 31,
Changes in the lease obligation for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized lease revenues of $52,668 in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss from its sub-lease arrangement with Gentor Resources Inc. (year ended December 31, 2020 - $53,623; year ended December 31, 2019 - $106,774). The Company has an exploration office lease in Congo, which can be cancelled with three months notices in advance without any penalty. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the lease expense in the amount of $20,400 (year ended December 31, 2020 - $20,400; year ended December 31, 2019 - $20,400) in relation to the Congo office, was capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets. 17.Financial risk management objectives and policies a)Fair value of financial assets and liabilities The consolidated statements of financial position carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, advances receivable Fair value hierarchy The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:
F-32
There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 and 3 during the reporting period. Cash and cash equivalents
The fair value of warrants (note 14c) would be included in the hierarchy as follows:
b)Risk Management Policies The Company is sensitive to changes in commodity prices and
c)Foreign Currency Risk Foreign currency risk is the risk that a variation in exchange rates between the United States dollar and Canadian dollar or other foreign currencies will affect the The following table indicates the impact of foreign currency exchange risk on net working capital as at December 31,
F-33
d)Credit Risk Financial instruments which are potentially subject to credit risk for the Company consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and advances receivable and The Company limits its exposure to credit risk on any investments by investing only in securities rated R1 (the highest rating) by credit rating agencies such as the DBRS (Dominion Bond Rating Service). Management continuously monitors the fair value of any investments to determine potential credit exposures. Short-term excess cash is invested in R1 rated investments including money market funds and other highly rated short-term investment instruments. Any credit risk exposure on cash balances is considered negligible as the Company places deposits only with major established banks in the countries in which it carries on operations. The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company attempts to ensure that there is sufficient cash to meet its liabilities when they are due and manages this risk by regularly evaluating its liquid financial resources to fund current and long-term obligations and to meet its capital commitments in a cost-effective manner. Temporary surplus funds of the Company are invested in short-term investments. The Company arranges the portfolio so that securities mature approximately when funds are needed. The key to success in managing liquidity is the degree of certainty in the cash flow projections. If future cash flows are fairly uncertain, the liquidity risk increases. The
f)Mineral Property Risk The
g)Capital Management The Company manages its common shares, warrants and stock options as capital. The
The Company's capital management objectives, policies and processes have remained unchanged during the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The Company is not subject to any capital requirements imposed by a lending institution or regulatory body, other than the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") which requires adequate working capital or financial resources such that, in the opinion of TSX, the listed issuer will be able to continue as a going concern. TSX will consider, among other things, the listed issuer's ability to meet its obligations as they come due, as well as its working capital position, quick asset position, total assets, capitalization, cash flow and earnings as well as accountants' or auditors' disclosures in the consolidated financial statements regarding the listed issuer's ability to continue as a going concern. 18.Supplemental cash flow information During the periods indicated the Company undertook the following significant non-cash transactions:
The following table summarizes information about changes to the
a)Provision for Income Taxes Major items causing the F-35
In April 2020, the Government of Canada announced the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy ("CEWS") in order to help employers retain and/or return Canadian-based employees to payrolls in response to challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Loncor determined that it met the employer eligibility criteria and applied for the CEWS retroactively to March 15, 2020. Cash payments of $30,295 (Cdn $40,604) were received in the year 2020. The Company has recorded a total gross subsidy of $nil under "interest and other income" in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, In July 2020, the program was redesigned and extended until December 2020. In September and November 2020, the Government of Canada announced further extensions of the program to June 2021. The Company intends to continue its participation in the CEWS program, subject to meeting the eligibility requirements. There are no unfulfilled conditions or other contingencies attaching to the current CEWS program. 22.Events after the reporting period In February 2022, the Company
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
