Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

o            REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

x          ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2016.

OR

o            TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to

OR

o             SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Commission file number: 001-37485

Jupai Holdings Limited

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s Name Into English)

Cayman Islands

(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

Yinli Building, 8/F
788 Guangzhong Road
Jingan District
Shanghai 200072
People’s Republic of China
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Min Liu, Chief Financial Officer

Yinli Building, 8/F
788 Guangzhong Road
Jingan District
Shanghai 200072
People’s Republic of China
Phone: (86 21) 6026-9003
Email: maine.liu@jpinvestment.cn
Fax: (86 21) 6086-8856
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None
(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.o  Yes   x  No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.o  Yes   x  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.x  Yes   o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).ox  Yes   o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.o  Item 17   o  Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).o  Yes   x  No

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.o  Yes   o No

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

Unless otherwise indicated and except where the context otherwise requires, references in this annual report on Form 20-F to:

·                  “China” or the “PRC” refers to the People’s Republic of China, excluding, for the purposes of this annual report only, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan;

·                  “Jupai,” “we,” “us,” “our company” and “our” refer to Jupai Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries, the Company’s variable interest entities, or VIEs, and their respective subsidiaries;

·                  “ordinary shares” or “shares” refers to our ordinary shares of par value US$0.0005 per share;

·                  “RMB” and “Renminbi” refer to the legal currency of China;

·                  “US$,” “U.S. dollars,” “$,” and “dollars” refer to the legal currency of the United States; and

·                  “U.S. GAAP” refers to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

This annual report on Form 20-F includes our audited consolidated financial statements including the statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 20152016 and the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 and 2016.

Effective July 1, 2016, we changed our reporting currency from the U.S. dollars to Renminbi. The aligning of the reporting currency with the underlying operations better reflects our results of operations for each period, and reduces the impact that the increased volatility of the Renminbi to U.S. dollars exchange rate will have on our reported operating results. This annual report contains translations of certain Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollars for convenience. Prior period financial results for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.2015 have been recast into the new reporting currency.

Unless otherwise noted, all translations from Renminbi to U.S. dollars in this annual report were made at RMB6.9430 to US$1.00, the noon buying rate for December 31, 2016 as set forth in the H. 10 statistical release of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve System. We make no representation that the Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. The PRC government restricts the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currency and foreign currency into Renminbi for certain types of transactions. On March 31, 2017, the noon buying rate set forth in the H. 10 statistical release of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve System was RMB6.8832 to US$1.00.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements that relate to our current expectations and views of future events. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the items entitled “Information on the Company,” “Risk Factors,” “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” “Financial Information” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” Our forward-looking statements relate to events that involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those listed under “Risk Factors,” which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigations Reform Act of 1995. You can identify some of these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “is/are likely to,” “potential,” “continue” or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statement contain these words. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to:

·                  our goals and strategies;

·                  our future business development, financial condition and results of operations;

·                  the expected growth of the wealth management services market as well as the asset management services market;

·                  our expectations regarding demand for, and market acceptance of, our services;

·                  PRC governmental regulations and policies governing the financial services and wealth management industries;

·                  competition in the wealth management services industry as well as the asset management services industry; and

·                  general economic and business conditions, particularly in China.

You should read thoroughly this annual report and the documents that we refer to herein with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from and/or worse than what we expect. Other sections of this annual report, including the Risk Factors and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, discuss factors which could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this annual report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

PART I.

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A.Selected Financial Data

Our Selected Consolidated Financial Data

The following table presents our selected consolidated financial information. The selected consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 20152016 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 20142015 and 20152016 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows data for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012, 2013 and 20132014 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this annual report. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Our historical results do not necessarily indicate our results expected for any future periods. You should read the following information in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. The Company uses the average exchange rates for the applicable period and the exchange rates at the applicable balance sheet date to translate the operating results and financial information, as applicable.

The following table presents a summary of our consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015:2016:

The following table presents a summary of our consolidated cash flows data for the periods indicated:

Exchange Rate Information

ThisFor your convenience, this annual report contains translations of RMB amounts into U.S. dollars at specific rates solely for the convenience of the reader. The conversion of RMB into U.S. dollars in this annual report is based on the noon buying rate as set forth in the H. 10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board. Unless otherwise noted, all translations of financial data from RMBsome Renminbi to U.S. dollars in this annual report were madedollar amounts for 2016 at a rate of RMB6.4778RMB6.9430 to US$1.00, which was the noon buyingcertified exchange rate in effect as of December 30, 2016 published by the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve System. The certified exchange rate on March 31, 2015.2017 was RMB6.8832 to US$1.00. We make no representation that any Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all.

The following table sets forth information concerning exchange rates between Renminbi and U.S. dollars for the periods indicated. The exchange rates refer to the exchange rates as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve System. These rates are provided solely for your convenience and are not necessarily the exchange rates that we used in this annual report or will use in the preparation of our periodic reports or any other information to be provided to you.

B.Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C.Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D.Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate the prospects of our business model, which relies heavily on our wealth management product advisory services.

We have a limited operating history. We commenced our wealth management services to distribute wealth management products in July 2010. We refer to “wealth management product” as an investment venture in which investors participate for wealth preservation or appreciation. We have also started from January 2013 to provide asset management services, including management of real estate or related funds and other fund products, to complement our wealth management product advisory services. Our net revenues increased rapidly from US$22.4 million in 2013 to US$38.9RMB237.7 million in 2014 to RMB595.0 million in 2015 and to US$94.4 millionRMB1.1 billion in 2015.2016. However, our historical growth rate may not be indicative of our future performance, especially if we are unable to maintain and further improve our wealth management product advisory and asset management capabilities to achieve our clients’ expectation of the investment returns.

Prior to 2015, substantially all of our revenue was attributable to one-time commissions and recurring service fees generated through our wealth management product related services. However, these revenues may not grow at the same rate as it had in the past. In addition, as the provision of our asset management and other services is at an early stage, we cannot assure you that these businesses will continue to grow or our attempts to further expand our service offerings will be successful.

In addition, the development of our business will primarily depend on the continued and growing demand for our services and products. Any failure on our part to keep up with the development of the wealth management service and asset management service sectors or our failure to respond to product innovation may materially and adversely affect the growth of our business.

You should consider our prospects in light of the risks and uncertainties that fast-growing companies with limited operating histories may encounter.

We may not be able to effectively manage our growth or implement our future business strategies, in which case our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We have experienced a period of rapid growth and expansion that has placed, and continues to place, significant strain on our management and resources. Factors relating to our business that may impact our growth and cause fluctuations include:

·                  a decline or slowdown of the growth in the value of products we distribute or manage;

·                  a reduction of the value of our invested assets and the investment returns credited to investors, which could reduce revenues from the asset management services;

·                  changes in laws or regulatory policies that could impact our ability to provide wealth management product advisory services and/or asset management services to our clients;

·                  negative publicity regarding the financial services industry in China;

·                  unanticipated delays of product or service rollouts;

·                  unanticipated changes to economic terms in contracts with our wealth management product providers, including renegotiations that may not be favorable to us or our clients;

·                  failure to enter into contracts with new wealth management product providers and cancellations of existing contracts with wealth management product providers;

·                  increases in the number of clients who decide to terminate their relationship with us or who ask us to redeem their investment in the products that we distribute; and

·                  continued volatility or declines in the equity, debt or real estate markets that reduce the assets under our management and may result in the clients’ withdrawing their investments.

We believe that our continued growth will depend on our ability to effectively implement our business strategies and address the above listed factors that may affect us.

In order to strengthen our leading market position in the third-party wealth management service industry in China, we need to allocate substantial resources to design and develop high-quality products, enhance our ability to source and distribute third-party wealth management products and continue to grow our asset management business, all of which require us to further expand, train, manage and motivate our workforce and maintain our relationships with our clients, third-party product developers, corporate borrowers, and other industry players such as financial institutions and asset management companies. Our capital expenditure may increase due to establishment of additional offices and client centers so as to increase our market penetration. We anticipate that we will also need to implement a variety of enhanced and upgraded operational and financial systems, procedures and controls, including the improvement of our accounting and other internal management systems. All of these endeavors involve risks and will require substantial management efforts, attention and skills, and significant additional expenditure. In addition, in July 2015 upon the completion of our initial public offering, we acquired Scepter Pacific Limited, or Scepter Pacific, which provides asset management services through its subsidiaries and consolidated entities under the trade name of E-House Capital.  E-House Capital is focused on the design and management of real estate or related investment projects and funds. The integration of the asset management business from E-house Capital into our company may demand additional resources and management attention from us. We cannot assure you that our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support our future operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to manage our growth or implement our future business strategies effectively, and failure to do so may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We may fail to obtain and maintain licenses and permits necessary to conduct our operations in China, and our business may be materially and adversely affected as a result of any changes in the laws and regulations governing the financial services industry in China.

The laws and regulations governing the financial services industry in China are still evolving. Substantial uncertainties exist regarding the regulatory system and the interpretation and implementation of current and any future PRC laws and regulations applicable to the financial services industry and companies that operate wealth management or asset management businesses. Depending on the type of products and services being offered, the business operation may be subject to the supervision and scrutiny by different authorities. To date, the PRC government has not adopted a unified regulatory framework governing the distribution or management of wealth management products. However, there are laws and regulations governing certain wealth management products that we distribute or manage, such as private equity products, private securities investment funds, asset management plans managed by securities companies or mutual fund management companies, trust products and insurance products.

New laws and regulations may be adopted to require additional licenses and permits. Our business may be adversely affected if the relevant authorities enhance their scrutiny over the wealth management products we distribute or manage. Currently, a license is required for sales of asset management plans. We believe such license is not required for our sourcing and distribution of wealth management products which feature asset management plans because, while we facilitate the sale of these products and provide ancillary consulting services, we are not directly selling asset management plans to and do not enter into the agreements with end customers. However, due to the lack of a clear and consistent regulatory framework for the sale of asset management plans, we cannot assure you that the relevant PRC government will agree with our interpretation of sales of the relevant rules. If the PRC government interprets the relevant rules differently and deems our services as sales of asset management plans, we may have to change our business model or cease to provide services relating to asset management plans. As a result, our business, results of operations and prospects would be adversely affected.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our existing licenses or permits, renew any of them when their current term expires or obtain additional licenses necessary for our future business expansion. For example, we sell mutual fund products and asset management plans relying on a license that was issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or the CSRC, to Shanghai Jupai Yumao Fund Sales Co., Ltd., or Yumao, a subsidiary of Shanghai Jupai Investment Group Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Jupai, in December 2014 to sell mutual fund products or other regulated fund products. We refer to “mutual fund” as a securities investment fund as defined under the PRC Law on Securities Investment Fund, which raises capital through public offerings of fund shares within China, and the related capital are managed by fund managers and placed in the custody of fund custodians, and invested in securities portfolios for the holders of fund shares. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our license to sell mutual fund products or other regulated fund products. In addition, we have provided consulting services to insurance brokerage companies in relation to our clients’ purchase of their insurance products. In the future, we plan to engage in the insurance brokerage business in China for which a license would be required. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain this license. The failure to obtain, retain or renew any of these licenses could materially disrupt our business and future expansion plans.

In addition, if future PRC regulations require that we obtain additional licenses or permits in order to continue to conduct our business operations, there is no guarantee that we would be able to obtain such licenses or permits in a timely fashion, or at all. If any of these situations occur, our business, financial condition and prospects would be materially and adversely affected. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Regulation.”

We may not be able to continue to retain or expand our high-net-worth client base or maintain or increase the amount of investment made by our clients in the products we distribute.

We target China’s large population of high-net-worth individuals as our clients. In light of China’s ever-evolving wealth management industry for high-net-wealth individuals we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain and increase the number of our clients or that our existing clients will maintain the same level of investment in the wealth management products that we distribute. As this industry in China is at an early stage of development and highly fragmented and has low barriers to entry, our existing and future competitors may be better equipped to capture market opportunities and grow their client bases faster than us. In addition, the evolving regulatory landscape of China’s financial service industry may not affect us and our competitors proportionately with respect to the ability to maintain or grow our client base. We may lose our leading position if we fail to maintain or further grow our client base at the same pace. A decrease in the number of our clients or a decrease in their spending on the products that we distribute may reduce revenues derived from commissions and recurring service fees and monetization opportunities for our asset management services. If we fail to continue to meet our clients’ expectations on the returns from the products we distribute or manage or if they are no longer satisfied with our services, they may leave us for our competitors and our reputation may be damaged by these clients, affecting our ability to attract new clients, which will in turn affect our financial condition and operational results.

If we cannot identify or effectively control the various risks involved in the wealth management products that we distribute or manage, our reputation, client relationships and overall business operations will be adversely affected.

We distribute a broad selection of third-party and self-developed wealth management products, including fixed income products, private equity and venture capital funds, public market products, insurance products and alternative investments, for which we may generate revenue based on one-time commissions and recurring fees. These products often have complex structures and involve various risks, including default risks, interest risks, liquidity risks and others. In addition, we are subject to risks arising from any potential misconduct or violation of law by the product providers or corporate borrowers. Although, the product providers or corporate borrowers of the wealth management products we distributed are typically directly liable to our clients in the event of a product default or otherwise, these incidences may negatively impact the performance of the applicable products that we distribute and adversely affect our reputation. Our success in maintaining our brand image depends, in part, on our ability to effectively control the risks associated with these products. Our wealth management product advisors not only need to understand the nature of the products but also need to accurately describe the products to, and evaluate them for, our clients. Although we enforce and implement strict risk management policies and procedures, they may not be fully effective in mitigating the risk exposure of our clients in all market environments or against all types of risks.

If we fail to identify and effectively control the risks associated with the products that we distribute or manage, or fail to disclose such risks to our clients in a sufficiently clear manner, and as a result our clients suffer financial loss or other damages resulting from their purchase of the wealth management products following our recommendations, our reputation, client relationship, business and prospects will be materially and adversely affected. The poor performance of such products and services, whether self-developed or sourced from third parties, or negative perceptions of the firms offering such products and services, may adversely:

·                  affect our distribution of such products and reduce our revenue;

·                  impact client confidence in the products we distribute; or

·                  impede the launch of new products or fund raising activities in connection with our asset management business.

Any harm to our reputation or failure to further enhance our brand recognition may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our reputation and brand recognition, including the brand of E-House Capital, is critical to the success of our business. We believe a well-recognized brand is crucial to increasing our high-net-worth client base and, in turn, facilitate our effort to monetize our services and enhancing our attractiveness to our clients and product providers. Our reputation and brand are vulnerable to many threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or impossible to remediate. Regulatory inquiries or investigations, lawsuits and other claims in the ordinary course of our business, employee misconduct, perceptions of conflicts of interest and rumors, among other things, could substantially damage our reputation, even if they are baseless or satisfactorily addressed.

Any perception that the quality of our wealth management product recommendations or the management capabilities of our fund products may not be the same as or better than that of other wealth management advisory firms or product distributors or other asset management firms can also damage our reputation. For example, if the performance of our fund of funds products or real estate or related fund products falls below expectations, they may be linked to negative perceptions that may damage our reputation and brand recognition. Moreover, any negative media publicity about any of the products that we distributed, the financial services industry or wealth management service industry in general, or product or service quality problems at other firms in the industry, including our competitors, may also negatively impact our reputation and brand. Negative perceptions of certain financial products and services, or the financial industry in general, may increase the number of withdrawals and redemptions or reduce purchases made by our clients, which would adversely impact our revenues and liquidity position.

If we are unable to maintain a good reputation or further enhance our brand recognition, our ability to attract and retain clients, wealth management product providers and key employees could be harmed and, as a result, our business and revenues would be materially and adversely affected.

Our future success depends on our continued efforts to retain our existing management team and other key management as well as to attract, integrate and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel, and our business may be disrupted if we lose their services.

Our future success depends heavily on the continued services of our current executive officers. If any of our executive officers or other key management are unable or unwilling to stay in their present positions, we may not be able to find suitable replacements, which may disrupt our business operations. We do not have key personnel insurance in place. If any of our executive officers or other key management joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose clients, know-how, key professionals and staff members. Each executive officer has entered into confidentiality and non-competition agreements with us. However, if any dispute arises between our executive officers and us, we cannot assure you of the extent to which any of these agreements could be enforced in China, where these executive officers reside, because of the uncertainties of China’s legal system. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC law and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.”

We also rely on the skills, experience and efforts of our experienced service professionals, including our wealth management product advisors, client managers and product development personnel. Our wealth management product advisors and client managers mainly recommend wealth management products. Our asset management personnel also design our self-developed products. The investment performance of products distributed or managed by us and the retention of our clients are partly dependent upon the strategies carried out and performance by our talents. The market for these talents is extremely competitive. The turnover rate of our wealth management product advisors, client managers and product development personnel for 2013, 2014, 2015 and 20152016 is approximately 57%33%, 33%34% and 34%37%, respectively. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified individuals or our recruiting and retention costs increase significantly, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.

Our acquisition of or investment in complementary businesses and assets as well as formation of strategic alliances involves significant risk and uncertainty that may prevent us from achieving our objectives and harm our financial condition and results of operations.

We from time to time consider opportunities for strategic acquisitions or investments in complementary businesses and assets and strategic alliances. In July 2015, we acquired Scepter Pacific. In January 2016, we acquired 78% interest inUP Capital Management Limited, Non-Linear Investment Management Limited and Jiangsu Kangan Insurance Brokers Co. Ltd. In addition, we may not be able to complete proposed acquisitions and the completed ones may not benefit our business as intended. For example, we have not yet completed our proposed acquisition of Shanghai Runju Financial Information Services Co. Ltd, or Runju, a peer-to-peer, or P2P, internet finance company.company primarily operates an online platform which facilitates the transfer of debt and equity securities, because the acquisition is still pending for assessment by management. See also “Item 4. Informationinformation on the Company—C. History and Development of the Company.” Our future strategic acquisitions and investments could subject us to uncertainties and risks, including:

·                  costs associated with, and difficulties in, integrating acquired businesses and managing newly acquired business;

·                  potentially significant goodwill impairment charges;

·                  high acquisition and financing costs;

·                  potential ongoing financial obligations and unforeseen or hidden liabilities;

·                  failure to achieve our intended objectives, benefits or revenue-enhancing opportunities;

·                  potential claims or litigation regarding our board’s exercise of its duty of care and other duties required under applicable law in connection with any of our significant acquisitions or investments approved by the board; and

·                  diversion of our resources and management attention.

Our failure to address these uncertainties and risks may affect our ability in implementing our acquisition strategies, which may in turn have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Our acquisition of Scepter Pacific, the holding company of E-House Capital, may not yield the benefits we anticipate.

With respect to our acquisition of Scepter Pacific, the holding company of E-House Capital, we expect to see the synergy from this acquisition across a number of areas, including leveraging resources with real estate project developers and realizing efficiencies in expenses incurred in relation to asset management and other services. However, we may encounter difficulties integrating the acquired operations, services, corporate culture and personnel into our existing business and operations, which could divert significant management attention from existing business operations and harm our business. This acquisition will require our management to develop expertise in new areas, manage new business relationships and attract new types of customers.   The expected synergy may not be achieved in the near term or at all, and if achieved, may not be sufficient to offset the costs associated with the acquisition.  Failure to generate the synergy we anticipate from the expansion of our current asset management services could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our business may be materially and adversely affected by various fluctuations and uncertainties in China’s real estate industry, including government measures aimed at the industry.

To date, a significant portion of the products that we distribute involve real estate or related assets, and this concentration is predominantly among the fixed income products that we distribute. In 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, the total value of the fixed income products we distributed that have real estate developers as corporate borrowers accounted for 65%73%, 73%68% and 68%73%, respectively, of the total transaction value of all fixed income products we distributed in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015.2016. We expect that the real estate or related products will continue to account for a significant portion of the products we distribute.

The success of such products depends significantly on conditions in China’s real estate industry and more particularly on the volume of new property transactions in China. Demand for private residential real estate in China has grown rapidly in recent years but such growth is often coupled with volatility and fluctuations in real estate transaction volume and prices.

The PRC government has from time to time taken measures to cool the real estate market and to curb the increase of housing prices by requiring more stringent implementation of housing price control measures. Such measures may depress the real estate market, dissuade potential purchasers from making purchases, reduce transaction volume, cause a decline in selling prices, and prevent developers from raising the capital they need and increase developers’ costs to start new projects. In addition, we cannot assure you that the PRC government will not adopt new measures in the future that may result in lower growth rates in the real estate industry. Frequent changes in government policies may also create uncertainty that could discourage investment in real estate.

We are also susceptible to the risks inherent in the operation of real estate-related businesses and assets. These risks include those associated with general and local economic conditions, changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area, natural disasters, changes in government regulations, changes in real property tax rates, changes in interest rates, the reduced availability of mortgage funds, which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, and other factors that are beyond our control.

If significant fluctuations occur in China’s real estate industry, or the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate materialize, they may result in decreased value and increased default rates of the wealth management products linked to real estate or the construction and development of the real estate that we distribute or manage, and reduced interest of our clients in purchasing such products, which account for a significant portion of our product choices. As a result, our revenues from such products could be adversely affected, which in turn may materially and negatively affect our overall financial condition and results of operations.

A drop in the investment performance for products distributed or managed by us, or a decline in the value of the assets under our management or any decrease in our other services could negatively impact our revenues and profitability.

Investment performance is a key competitive factor for products distributed or managed by us. Strong investment performance helps us to retain and expand our client base and helps generate new sales of products and services. Strong investment performance is therefore an important element to our goals of maximizing the value of products and services provided to our clients or the assets under our management. There can be no assurance as to how future investment performance will compare to our competitors or that historical performance will be indicative of future returns. Any drop or perceived drop in investment performance as compared to our competitors could cause a decline in sales of our investment products and services. These impacts may also reduce our aggregate amount of assets under management and management fees. Poor investment performance could also adversely affect our ability to expand the distribution of third-party wealth management products and our self-developed products.

In addition, the profitability of our growing asset management services depends on fees charged based on the value of assets under management. Any impairment on the value of the assets we manage, whether caused by fluctuations or downturns in the underlying markets or otherwise, will reduce our revenues generated from asset management business, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our overall financial performance and results of operations.

In 2016, we cooperated with some peer firms in the asset management industry. We charged those firms consulting service fees for our services. Depending on the availability of products suitable, we may not continue this line of services in the future. Furthermore, we negotiate our service fees with our counterparts on a deal-by-deal basis, adding to the level of uncertainty in our revenues from this business.

If we breach the contractual obligations under the fund management documents or fiduciary duties we owe to the fund counterparties in connection with our asset management services, our results of operations will be adversely impacted.

Our asset management business has experienced substantial growth and is expected to continue to grow in the future. We intend to further develop our fund management business by offering and managing a broader variety of funds, including funds of securities investment funds, funds of hedge funds and funds of fixed income funds.

Our asset management business involves inherent risks. For some of the funds that we self-develop or manage, such as contractual funds, we may be exposed to indemnity or other legal liabilities if we are deemed to have breached our legal obligations as fund managers under the fund management documents or fund subscription agreements, and are therefore susceptible to legal disputes and potentially significant damages. In cases where we serve as the general partner or co-general partner for the funds that are in the form of limited partnership, we are required to manage the funds for the limited partners or the investors. We may be removed by the limited partners without cause by their exercising their kick-out rights if they are not satisfied with our services in the roles of general partner or co-general partner of the funds. If we are deemed to have breached our fiduciary duty, we may be exposed to risks and losses related to legal disputes. We could also experience losses on our principal for funds invested by us and the entity as the general partner shall bear unlimited joint and several liabilities for the debts of any fund managed by it out of all its assets. We cannot assure you that our efforts to further develop the fund management business will be successful. If our asset management business fails, our future growth may be materially and adversely affected and our reputation and credibility may be damaged among high-net-worth individuals, which in turn may affect our wealth management product advisory services business.

Our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in identifying or mitigating risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, including employee and financial advisor misconduct.

We have devoted significant resources to developing our risk management policies and procedures and will continue to do so. Nonetheless, our policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk. Many of our risk management policies are based upon observed historical market behavior or statistics based on historical models. During periods of market volatility or due to unforeseen events, the historically derived correlations upon which these methods are based may not be valid. As a result, these methods may not predict future exposures accurately, which could be significantly greater than what our models indicate. This could cause us to incur investment losses or cause our hedging and other risk management strategies to be ineffective. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, catastrophe occurrence or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible to us, which may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated.

Moreover, we are subject to the risks of errors and misconduct by our employees and advisors, which include:

·                  engaging in misrepresentation or fraudulent activities when marketing or distributing wealth management products to clients;

·                  improperly using or disclosing confidential information of our clients, third-party wealth management product providers or other parties;

·                  concealing unauthorized or unsuccessful activities; or

·                  otherwise not complying with laws and regulations or our internal policies or procedures.

Although we have established an internal compliance system to supervise service quality and regulation compliance, these risks may be difficult to detect in advance and deter, and could harm our business, results of operations or financial performance.

In addition, although we perform due diligence on potential clients, we cannot assure you that we will be able to identify all the possible issues based on the information available to us. If certain investors do not meet the relevant qualification requirements for products we distribute or under applicable laws, we may also be deemed in default of the obligations required in our contract with the product providers. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to properly record and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk.

Non-compliance on the part of third parties with which we conduct business could disrupt our business and adversely affect our results of operation.

Our third-party wealth management product providers or other business counterparties may be subject to regulatory penalties or punishments because of their regulatory compliance failures, which may affect our business activities and reputation and in turn, our results of operations. Although we conduct due diligence on our business counterparties, we cannot be certain whether any such counterparty has infringed or will infringe any third parties’ legal rights or violate any regulatory requirements. We require the business counterparties in the financial services industry to provide their licenses, permits or filing documents in respect of the wealth management products before we distribute their products, but we cannot assure you that these counterparties will continue to maintain all applicable permits and approvals, and any noncompliance on the part of these counterparties may cause potential liabilities to us and in turn disrupt our operations.

The impairment or negative performance of other financial services companies could adversely affect us.

We routinely work with counterparties in the financial services industry, including asset management companies, trust companies, insurers and other institutions, when providing our services. A decline in the financial condition of one or more financial services institutions may expose us to credit losses or defaults, limit our access to liquidity or otherwise disrupt the operations of our businesses. While we regularly assess our exposure to different industries and counterparties, the performance and financial strength of specific institutions are subject to rapid change, the timing and extent of which cannot be known.

Downgrades in the credit or financial strength ratings assigned to the counterparties with whom we transact or other adverse reputational impacts to such counterparties could create the perception that our financial condition will be adversely impacted as a result of potential future defaults by such counterparties. As a result, our operations and financial performances may be adversely impacted.

If the PRC governmental authorities penalize us for our historical promotion of collective fund trust plans, or trust plans, our business, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected.

Under the Administrative Rules Regarding Trust Company-Sponsored Collective Fund Trust Plans, or the Trust Plan Rules, issued by the China Banking Regulatory Commission, or the CBRC, on January 23, 2007, which became effective on March 1, 2007 and was subsequently amended on February 4, 2009, entities that are not financial institutions cannot conduct “promotion” of collective fund trust plans, or trust plans. A “trust plan” refers to a collective investment arrangement under which a trust company, in its capacity as trustee, manages funds entrusted to it by multiple sources for the interest of specified beneficiaries (often the same as the entrusting parties), by investing the entrusted funds in pre-determined assets or projects to generate returns for the beneficiaries. Investments in trust plans are referred to as trust products. Trust products have been a major wealth management product available to high-net-worth individuals in China. The CBRC strengthened the regulation on promotion of trust plans in a recent circular and its implementation rules, which explicitly prohibit the trust companies from engaging any non-financial institutions to promote trust plans directly or indirectly through advisory, consulting, brokerage or other services. Our distribution of the trust plans and the relevant services we provided may be deemed as “promotion” of the trust plans under the PRC regulations and rules. We have ceased to provide service to new trust plans after the issuance of this circular by the CBRC in April 2014. However, we could also be penalized by the CBRC or other governmental authorities in relation to the trust plans that we assisted to distribute prior to the issuance of the CBRC circular, which could adversely impact our results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Regulations — Regulations on Trust Products.”

Any material decrease in the commission and fee rates for our services may have an adverse effect on our revenues, cash flow and results of operations.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from commissions and recurring fees paid by wealth management product providers and corporate borrowers when our clients invest in the products we distribute. The commission and recurring fee rates are set by such product providers and corporate borrowers or negotiated between such parties and us, and vary from product to product. Although the fee rates within any given category of the products we distribute remained relatively stable during the applicable periods referenced in this annual report, future commission and recurring fee rates may be subject to change based on the prevailing political, economic, regulatory, taxation and competitive factors that affect product providers or corporate borrowers. These factors, which are not within our control, include the capacity of product providers to place new business and realize profits, client demand and preference for wealth management products, the availability of comparable products from other product providers at a lower cost, the availability of alternative wealth management products to clients and the tax deductibility of commissions and fees. In addition, the historical volume of wealth management products that we distributed or managed may have a significant impact on our bargaining power with third-party wealth management product providers in relation to the commission and fee rates for future products. Because we do not determine, and cannot predict, the timing or extent of commission and fee rate changes with respect to the wealth management products, it is difficult for us to assess the effect of any of these changes on our operations. In order to maintain our relationships with the product providers and to enter into contracts for new products, we may have to accept lower commission rates or other less favorable terms, which could reduce our revenues. Although we believe that substitute third-party providers for most of the wealth management products we distribute are generally available, if some of our key wealth management product providers decide not to enter into new contracts with us, or our relationships with them are otherwise impacted, our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.Furthermore, as we continue to grow our asset management services, we may face similar fee rates risk in connection with our asset management services.

We depend on a small number of third-party product providers to derive a significant portion of our revenues and this dependence may continue.

Prior to 2015, we have a relatively high concentration of product providers and derive a significant portion of our revenues from a limited number of third-party wealth management product providers. Among our product providers, two of them accounted for more than 10% individually and 46.1% in the aggregate of the total value of products we distributed in 2013, two of them accounted for more than 10% individually and 39.6% in the aggregate of the total value of products we distributed in 2014, and one of them accounted for 11.3% of the total value of products we distributed in 2015.  Although our dependence on key product providers in terms of revenue contribution has declined in recent years, we cannot guarantee that this trend will continue.  We have maintained good relationships with our major product providers prior to 2015. We source many of our products from these providers mainly because of the historically reliable performance of their products, but we do not depend on these major providers as the only sources of quality investment products. We believe that, with our comprehensive due diligence, we can re-allocate the sources of our products to other product providers with which we currently cooperate or to identify new product providers in a flexible way to meet our clients’ investment needs. However, if we lose any one of our major product providers or any of these product providers significantly reduces its volume of business with us, our net revenues and profitability would be substantially reduced if we are unable to re-allocate the sources of products promptly, or at all. In addition, the product volume we source and distribute from specific product providers may vary from period to period, particularly because we are not the exclusive distributor for any particular product provider. Our high concentration of product providers may also adversely affect our ability to negotiate fee rates with these product providers, which may in turn materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from several affluent cities in China, and we face market risk due to our concentration in these cities.

As of December 31, 2015,2016, we derived our revenues from 5079 client centers in 2943 affluent cities in China, includingsuch as Shanghai, Beijing, Hangzhou and Shenzhen. In 2015,2016, approximately 69%46% of our total revenues were derived from Shanghai and Hangzhou alone. We expect these two urban centers to continue to be important sources of revenues. If any of these major urban centers experiences an event that negatively impacts the local real estate or financial industries, such as a serious economic downturn or contraction, a natural disaster, or slower growth due to adverse governmental policies or otherwise, demand for our services could decline significantly and our business and growth prospects could be materially and adversely impacted.

We may face increased competition and if we are unable to compete successfully, we could lose our market share and our results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

The wealth management market in China is at an early stage of development and is highly fragmented. As the industry develops, we may face increased competition. In distributing wealth management products, we face direct competition primarily from other third-party wealth management service providers such as Noah Holdings Limited. We also compete with many local PRC commercial banks and insurance companies that have their own wealth management teams and sales forces to distribute their products. In addition, there is a risk that we may not successfully identify new product and service opportunities or develop and introduce these opportunities in a timely and cost-effective manner. New competitors that are better adapted to the wealth management service industry may emerge, which could cause us to lose market share in key market segments.

Our competitors may have better brand recognition, stronger market influence, greater financial and/or marketing resources. For example, the commercial banks we compete with tend to enjoy distribution advantages due to their nationwide distribution networks, longer operating histories, broader client bases and settlement capabilities. Moreover, many wealth management product providers with whom we currently have relationships, such as commercial banks and trust companies, are also engaged in, or may in the future engage in, the distribution of wealth management products and may benefit from the integration of wealth management products with their other product offerings.

In addition, in the asset management service sector, we may face competition from mutual fund management companies and securities firms that have emerged or will emerge in the asset management business in China in the foreseeable future. With an increasing portion of wealth management products being distributed through online or mobile platforms, we expect we may potentially compete with an increasing number of internet finance enterprises.

Any failure to protect our clients’ privacy and confidential information could lead to legal liability, adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our services involve the exchange, storage and analysis of highly confidential information, including detailed personal and financial information regarding our high-net-worth clients, through a variety of electronic and non-electronic means, and our reputation and business operations are highly dependent on our ability to safeguard the confidential personal data and information of our clients. We rely on a network of process and software controls to protect the confidentiality of data provided to us or stored on our systems.

If we do not maintain adequate internal controls or fail to implement new or improved controls, this data could be misappropriated or confidentiality could otherwise be breached. We could be subject to liability if we inappropriately disclose any client’s personal information, or if third parties are able to illegally gain access to any client’s name, address, portfolio holdings, or other personal and confidential information. Any such event could subject us to claims for identity theft or other similar fraud claims or claims for other misuses of personal information, such as unauthorized marketing or unauthorized access to personal information. In addition, such events would cause our clients to lose their trust and confidence in us, which may result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property, which could reduce demand for the products that we distribute and our services, adversely affect our revenues and harm our competitive position.

We rely primarily on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark and anti-unfair competition laws and contractual rights to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that the steps we have taken or will take in the future to protect our intellectual property or piracy will prove to be sufficient. For example, although we require our employees, wealth management product providers and others to enter into confidentiality agreements in order to protect our trade secrets, other proprietary information and, most importantly, our client information, these agreements might not effectively prevent disclosure of our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information and might not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of such confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information, and in such cases we could not assert any trade secret rights against such parties. Implementation of intellectual property-related laws in China has historically been lacking, primarily due to ambiguity in the PRC laws and enforcement difficulties. Accordingly, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protection in China may not be as effective as in the United States or other countries. Current or potential competitors may use our intellectual property without our authorization in the development of products and services that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours, which could reduce demand for our solutions and services, adversely affect our revenues and harm our competitive position. Even if we were to discover evidence of infringement or misappropriation, our recourse against such competitors may be limited or could require us to pursue litigation, which could involve substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention from the operation of our business.

We may face intellectual property infringement claims, which could be time-consuming and costly to defend and may result in the loss of significant rights by us.

Although we have not been subject to any litigation, pending or threatened, alleging infringement of third parties’ intellectual property rights, we cannot assure you that such infringement claims will not be asserted against us in the future. Some third parties may own technology patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and Internet content, which they may use to assert claims against us. We require our advisors, managers and relevant staff to sign agreements upon joining our company, to undertake to follow certain procedures designed to reduce the likelihood that we may use, develop or make available any content or applications without the proper licenses or necessary third party consents. However, these procedures may not be effective in completely preventing the unauthorized posting or use of copyrighted material or the infringement of other rights of third parties.

Intellectual property litigation is expensive and time-consuming and could divert resources and management attention from the operation of our business. If there is a successful claim of infringement, we may be required to alter our services, cease certain activities, pay substantial royalties and damages to, and obtain one or more licenses from third parties. We may not be able to obtain those licenses on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. Any of those consequences could cause us to lose revenues, impair our client relationships and harm our reputation.

Legal or administrative proceedings or allegations against us or our management could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

We have not been subject to legal or administrative proceedings or third-party allegations historically which were likely to have had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We have been, and may from time to time in the future become, a party to such proceedings or claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. For example, in July 2015, Shanghai Jupai was named as a defendant in a civil claim by two investors who invested in a third-party fund product at the advisory of Shanghai Jupai. After default by that fund in paying the plaintiffs the promised investment returns, the two plaintiffs filed lawsuit alleging that Shanghai Jupai shall be jointly liable with the fund the plaintiffs invested in for the return of the investment as a result of alleged misconducts by Shanghai Jupai, such as the alleged misrepresentation by Shanghai Jupai of information concerning the investment project and sought payment by Shanghai Jupai of such investment return. Shanghai Jupai is not a partner of such third-party fund nor has it entered into any partnership or investment agreement with the plaintiffs with respect to their investment. The company has filed a response to the allegations and finds such allegations to be without merit.  However, anyAny lawsuit or allegation in this nature,against us, with or without merit, or any perceived unfair, unethical, fraudulent or inappropriate business practice by us or perceived wrong doing by any key member of our management team could harm our reputation, distract our management from day-to-day operations and cause us to incur significant expenses in the defense of such matters. A substantial judgment, award, settlement, fine, or penalty may generate negative publicity against us and could be materially adverse to our operating results or cash flows for a particular future period, depending on our results for that period. This risk may be heightened during periods when credit, equity or other financial markets are volatile, or when clients or investors are experiencing losses.

If we fail to maintain our relationship with E-House and SINA, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Both E-House (China) Holdings Limited, or E-House, and SINA Corporation, or SINA, are our existing principal shareholders and are strategically significant for our business and they may help us grow our real estate or real estate-related wealth management products and expand our presence online. By leveraging our partnerships with E-House and SINA, we seek to capture new business opportunities and increase our addressable markets by exploring and entering into the online third-party wealth management and asset management markets. To a certain extent, we rely on continued cooperation with them to develop, innovate and diversify our products offerings. Either of E-House and SINA could, at any time, reduce its support for our business. In addition, their dual role as our substantial shareholders and contractual counterparty could result in conflicts of interest. If for any reason E-House or SINA reduces its support for our real estate or related wealth management products and our online services, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

If the operation of 100run.com is found to violate PRC law, we may no longer distribute products through this platform and our reputation may be negatively affected.

Before August 2014, Shanghai Jupai held 48% equity in Yibairun Investment Consulting (Beijing) Co., Ltd., or Yibairun, which operates the website of 100run.com. 100run.com displays information on trust and asset management plans and private equity fund products online, and its clients can invest in such products through the website with a relatively low minimum investment amount. We used to engage Yibairun in the distribution of certain asset management plans, but we did not generate any profit from 100run.com.100run.com. In August 2014, we sold our entire holding in Yibairun to a third-party individual but we may in the future acquire Yibairun or similar platforms again. The aggregate value of wealth management products we distributed through 100run.com amounted to RMB1,879.3 million (US$290.1 million),RMB1.9 billion and RMB4.5 billion in 2015.2015 and 2016, respectively. Regulatory oversight of the business model of Yibairun and similar platforms is currently unclear. If PRC regulatory authorities deem its operations illegal and order Yibairun to cease operations, or promulgate new rules and impose restrictions on the operations of Yibairun, we may no longer be able to distribute products through 100run.com, and our reputation in the investor community may be adversely affected by our historical affiliation with it. If we acquire Yibairun again in the future or if we acquire other similar platforms to distribute wealth management products, or complete our acquisition of Runju, we may also be subject to greater regulatory measuresoversight due to our ownership of those companies.

We are required to register our client centers outside of our corporate residence address as branch offices under PRC law and any failure to do so may subject our centers to shut-down or penalties.

Under PRC law, a company setting up premises for business operations outside its residence address must register the premises as branch offices with the competent local industry and commerce bureau and obtain business licenses for them as branch offices. We have 5079 client centers in 2943 cities across China as of December 31, 2015.2016. As of the date of this annual report, 25February 28, 2017, 34 of these client centers in their relevant cities have not been registered as branch offices and the net revenues attributable to these centers, in the aggregate, accounted for 2.2%5.1%, 5.1%9.5% and 9.5%9.7% of our net revenues in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, respectively. We are in the process of applying for the registration of these client centers and we cannot assure you whether the registration can be completed in a timely manner. Although we have not been subject to any query or investigation by any PRC government authority regarding the absence of such registration, if the PRC regulatory authorities determine that we are in violation of the relevant laws and regulations, we may be subject to penalties, including fines, confiscation of income and suspension of operation. If we become subject to these penalties, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

If the P2P internet finance business of Jubaopen is found to violate any PRC laws or regulations, or if our Jupai brand is associated with any unfavorable publicity concerning the P2P lending business of Jubaopen or any other player in that industry, our business, financial conditions and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We recently acquired Shanghai Yixun Internet Finance Information Services Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Yixun, which operates Jubaopen, a P2P internet finance website.  Due to the relatively short history of the P2P lending services industry in China, the regulatory framework governing this industry is still evolving.  See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations on P2P Lending Business.”

To comply with existing rules, laws, regulations and governmental policies relating to the P2P lending services industry, we plan to implement various policies and procedures when we integrate the operations of Jubaopen. However, due to the lack of detailed rules and the fact that the rules, laws and regulations are expected to continue to evolve in this newly emerging industry, we cannot be certain that the operations of Jubaopen would not be deemed to violate any existing or future rules, laws and regulations.

The applicable rules do not specify the liabilities that will be imposed on the service providers who fail to comply with the principles and requirements contained thereunder, nor do other applicable rules, laws and regulations contain specific liability provisions specially as to the P2P lending platform like Jubaopen. However, if the business of Jubaopen is found to be in violation of any rules, laws or regulations, we may face injunctions, including orders to cease illegal activities, and may be exposed to other penalties as determined by the relevant government authorities as well. If such situations occur, our business, financial condition and prospects would be materially and adversely affected. In addition, given the evolving regulatory environment in which we operate, we cannot rule out the possibility that the PRC government will institute a licensing regime covering the P2P lending industry. If such a licensing regime were introduced, we cannot assure you that Jubaopen would be able to obtain any newly required license in a timely manner, or at all.

Furthermore, since 2016, the central government of China has taken stricter measures to monitor the P2P lending industry.  For example, the PRC government launched investigations in early 2016 involving participants of the P2P lending industry, many of which resulted in criminal convictions.  There has been negative media coverage over those firms that are subject of the investigations and, in some instances, the P2P lending industry in general.  Such adverse publicity concerning the P2P lending industry could materially and adversely affect the results of the operations of Jubaopen, and due to our association with Jubaopen, the rest of our business as well.

Our principal shareholders have substantial influence over our company and their interests may not be aligned with the interests of our other shareholders.

As of March 31, 2016,February 28, 2017, Mr. Tianxiang Hu, our co-chairman and executive chairman of the board of directors Dr. Weishi Yao, ourand chief operatingexecutive officer, and director, and Mr. Xin Zhou, a director of our company, beneficially own an aggregate of approximately 25.4%50.4% of our share capital. As a result of this high level of shareholding, Mr. Hu Dr. Yao and Mr. Zhou have substantial influence over our business, including decisions regarding mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions.  Also, E-House and SINA hold 28.8% and 11.4%, respectively,holds 11.3% of our total outstanding shares as of March 31, 2016.February 28, 2017. Our principal shareholders  may take actions that are not in the best interests of us or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and might reduce the price of our ADSs. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by our other shareholders, including those who hold ADSs. For more information regarding our principal shareholders and their affiliated entities, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees— E. Share Ownership.”

We have granted, and may continue to grant, share options and other share-based compensation in the future, which may materially impact our future results of operations.

As of the date of this annual report,February 28, 2017, options to purchase 15,642,600 ordinary shares and 2,680,4007,428,548 restricted shares have been granted, and options to purchase 14,791,77813,982,343 ordinary shares and 2,680,4006,375,081 restricted shares are outstanding under our currently effective incentive share plan. As a result of these grants and potential future grants under the plans, we have incurred, and will incur in future periods, significant share-based compensation expenses. We account for compensation costs for all stock options using a fair-value based method and recognize expenses in our consolidated statement of income in accordance with the relevant rules in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which may have a material adverse effect on our net income. Any additional securities issued under share-based compensation schemes will dilute the ownership interests of our shareholders, including holders of our ADSs. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers.” We believe the granting of share-based compensation is of significant importance to our ability to attract and retain key employees and consultants, and we will continue to grant share-based compensation to directors, employees or consultants in the future.

If we fail to implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.

PriorWe are subject to the initialreporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has adopted rules requiring a public offering, we werecompany to include a private company with limited accounting personnelreport of management on the effectiveness of such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report on Form 20-F. As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other resources with which to addressrelated rules promulgated by the SEC, our internal controls and procedures. Our management has not completed an assessment ofassessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm has not conducted an audit of our internal control over financial reporting. However, in connection with the audits of our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified both material weakness and significant deficiencies and as2016 using criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of December 31, 2015, we and our independent registered public accounting firm continued to identify outstanding significant deficiencies.

We have implemented and are continuing to implement a number of measures to address the previously identified material weakness, and the significant deficiencies and other control deficiencies we continue to identify. For details, see “Item 15. Controls and Procedures — Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.” However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue implementing these measures in the future, or that we will not identify additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the future.

Furthermore, it is possible that, had we completed an assessment of our internal controls or our independent registered public accounting firm conducted an audit of our internal control over financial reporting, we and/or such firm might have identified additional material weaknesses and deficiencies. We are a public company in the United States subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404Sponsoring Organizations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, requires that we include a report ofTreadway Commission. Based on this assessment, our management on our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F beginning with our annual report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging growth company” as such term is defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our management may concludeconcluded that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting iswas effective our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue a report that is qualified if it is not satisfied with our internal controls, including the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us. In addition, as we continue to grow our business as a public company, our reporting obligations may place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be unable to timely complete our evaluation testing and any required remediation.

During the course of documenting and testing our internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, as of December 31, 2016 we may identify other weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if2016.

If we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of ouran effective internal control overenvironment for our financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may therefore need to incur additional costs and use additional management and other resources in an effort to comply with Section 404. If we fail to achieve404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and maintain another requirements going forward. Moreover, effective internal control environment, weover financial reporting is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports. As a result, any failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could suffer material misstatementsresult in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a decline incould negatively impact the trading price of our ADSs.

Additionally,, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the stock exchange on which we list, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods.

We have limited insurance coverage.

Insurance companies in China currently do not offer as extensive an array of insurance products as insurance companies in more developed economies. Other than casualty insurance on some of our assets, we do not have commercial insurance coverage on our other assets and we do not have insurance to cover our business or interruption of our business, litigation or product liability. Moreover, the low coverage limits of our property insurance policies may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses, particularly with respect to any loss of business and reputation that may occur. We have determined that the costs of insuring for these risks and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us to have such insurance. Any uninsured occurrence of loss or damage to property, litigation or business disruption may result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating certain of our operations in China do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.

We sell mutual funds and asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies from time to time. While the distribution of mutual funds and asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies is not explicitly categorized as restricted to foreign investment, a license is required for the direct sales of mutual fund and asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies. In practice, such license is generally unavailable to foreign-invested enterprises or their subsidiaries. In order to conduct our direct sales services in the future, we have entered into contractual arrangements through Shanghai Juxiang Investment Management Consulting Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Juxiang, which is one of our PRC subsidiaries, with Shanghai Jupai. Yumao, a wholly owned subsidiary of Shanghai Jupai, holds such license.

Part of our business includes conducting market surveys, which is defined by the current Foreign Investment Catalogue to mean the collection and analysis of information concerning the performance and prospects of certain commercial products and/or services. Market survey is categorized as restricted to foreign investment. The Measures for the Administration of Foreign-Related Investigation, promulgated by the National Bureau of Statistics on July 19, 2004, states that foreign-invested entities cannot conduct market survey unless a license has been granted by the relevant authority. The license application is subject to stringent requirements and is ultimately subject to the discretion of the relevant authority. Because Shanghai Juxiang is unable to obtain such license, we conduct such activities through Shanghai Jupai, which, as a domestic PRC company, is not required to obtain such license for market survey.

In terms of our asset management business, although foreign-invested enterprises incorporated in China are not expressly prohibited from providing asset management services in China, in practice, when managing the various funds, we may also need to invest in projects or funds at the same time. Some targeted projects, such as high-end hotel and office building rental projects are in prohibited or restricted categories for foreign investment. Therefore, we provide asset management services through contractual arrangements between Baoyi Investment Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Baoyi, which is one of our PRC subsidiaries, and Shanghai E-Cheng Asset Management Co., Ltd, or Shanghai E-Cheng.

Our contractual arrangements with Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng, and their respective shareholders enable us to (1) have power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng; (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits from Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng in consideration for the services provided by Shanghai Juxiang and Shanghai Baoyi, respectively; and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng when and to the extent permitted by PRC law, or request any existing shareholder of Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng to transfer any or part of the equity interest in Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng to another PRC person or entity designated by us at any time at our discretion. Because of these contractual arrangements, we are the primary beneficiary of Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng and hence treat each of Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng as our VIE, and consolidate their and their respective subsidiaries’ results of operations into ours.

If the PRC government finds that our contractual arrangements do not comply with its restrictions on foreign investment in the wealth management or asset management business, or if the PRC government otherwise finds that we, Shanghai Jupai, Shanghai E-Cheng or any of their respective subsidiaries or client centers are in violation of PRC laws or regulations or lack the necessary permits or licenses to operate our business, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities, including the CSRC, would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations or failures, including, without limitation:

·                  revoking our business and operating licenses;

·                  discontinuing or restricting our operations;

·                  imposing fines or confiscating any of our income that they deem to have been obtained through illegal operations;

·                  imposing conditions or requirements with which we or our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated entities may not be able to comply;

·                  requiring us or our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated entities to restructure the relevant ownership structure or operations;

·                  restricting or prohibiting our use of the proceeds from the initial public offering or other financing activities of Jupai Holdings Limited to finance the business and operations of our VIEs and their respective subsidiaries; or

·                  taking other regulatory or enforcement actions that could be harmful to our business.

Any of these actions could cause significant disruption to our business operations, and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, it is unclear what impact the PRC government actions would have on us and on our ability to consolidate the financial results of any of our consolidated entities in our consolidated financial statements, if the PRC government authorities find our legal structure and contractual arrangements to be in violation of PRC laws, rules and regulations. If any of these penalties results in our inability to direct the activities of Shanghai Jupai or Shanghai E-Cheng that most significantly impact its economic performance and/or our failure to receive the economic benefits from Shanghai Jupai or Shanghai E-Cheng, we may not be able to consolidate Shanghai Jupai or Shanghai E-Cheng into our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

We rely on contractual arrangements with our VIEs, and their respective shareholders for a portion of our China operations, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control.

We rely on contractual arrangements with our VIEs, Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng, and their respective shareholders to operate a portion of our operations in China, including asset management services, market survey and the direct sale of mutual funds and asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with control over our VIEs. For example, our VIEs and their respective shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to operate our business in an acceptable manner or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests. These risks exist throughout the period in which we operate our businesses through the contractual arrangements with our VIEs. If we were the controlling shareholder of the VIEs with direct ownership, we would be able to exercise our rights as shareholders to effect changes to their board of directors, which in turn could implement changes at the management and operational level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, as a legal matter, if our VIEs or their respective shareholders fail to perform their obligations under these contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs to enforce such arrangements, and rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including contract remedies, which may be time-consuming, unpredictable and expensive. If we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, our business and operations could be severely disrupted, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and damage our reputation. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of Chinese laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.”

In 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, Shanghai Jupai, Shanghai E-Cheng and their respective subsidiaries and branches contributed 68%11%, 11%40% and 40%65% of our total net revenues. In the event we are unable to enforce the contractual arrangements, we may not be able to have the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of Shanghai Jupai, Shanghai E-Cheng and their respective subsidiaries and branches, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected, and we may not be able to consolidate the financial results of Shanghai Jupai, Shanghai E-Cheng and their respective subsidiaries and branches into our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The shareholders of our VIEs may have potential conflicts of interest with us, and if any such conflicts of interest are not resolved in our favor, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We have designated individuals who are PRC nationals to be the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng. These individuals may have conflicts of interest with us. Shanghai Jupai is approximately 67.7% owned by Mr. Tianxiang Hu, our co-chairman and executive chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer and 10% owned by Dr. Weishi Yao, our chief operating officer and director.Yao. Conflicts of interest may arise between the roles of Mr. Hu and Dr. Yao as shareholders, directors and officers of our company and as shareholders, directors and officers of our VIEs. We rely on these individuals to abide by the laws of the Cayman Islands, which provide that directors and officers owe a fiduciary duties to our company that requires them to act in good faith and in the best interest of our company and not to use their positions for personal gains. On the other hand, PRC laws also provide that a director or an executive officer owes a fiduciary duty to the company he or she directs or manages. Shanghai E-Cheng is 50.0% owned by Zuyu Ding and 50.0% owned by Weijie Ma. Mr. Ding and Mr. Ma are both employees of E-House and there are potentially conflicts of interests between the roles of Mr. Ding and Mr. Ma as nominee shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng and as employees of E-House. We cannot assure you that when conflicts arise, shareholders of our VIEs will act in the best interest of our company or that conflicts will be resolved in our favor. These individuals may breach or cause the VIEs to breach the existing contractual arrangements. If we cannot resolve any conflicts of interest or disputes between us and these shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which may be expensive, time-consuming and disruptive to our operations. There is also substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

Our ability to enforce the equity pledge agreements between us and the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng may be subject to limitations based on PRC laws and regulations.

Pursuant to the equity pledge agreements relating to Shanghai Jupai, the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai pledged their equity interests in Shanghai Jupai to Shanghai Juxiang to secure Shanghai Jupai’s performance of the obligations and indebtedness under the consulting services agreement. Pursuant to the equity pledge agreements relating to Shanghai E-Cheng, the shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng pledged their equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng to Shanghai Baoyi to secure Shanghai E-Cheng’s performance of the obligations and indebtedness under the consulting services agreement. The equity pledges under these equity pledge agreements have been registered with the relevant local branch of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, or the SAIC. Under the PRC Property Law, when an obligor fails to pay its debt when due, the pledgee may choose to either conclude an agreement with the pledgor to obtain the pledged equity or seek payments from the proceeds of the auction or sell-off of the pledged equity. If Shanghai Jupai or Shanghai E-Cheng fails to perform its obligations secured by the pledges under the equity pledge agreements, one remedy in the event of default under the agreements is to require the pledgor to sell the equity interests in Shanghai Jupai or Shanghai E-Cheng, as applicable, in an auction or private sale and remit the proceeds to our subsidiaries in China, net of related taxes and expenses. Such an auction or private sale may not result in our receipt of the full value of the equity interests in our VIEs. We consider it very unlikely that the public auction process would be undertaken since, in an event of default, our preferred approach would be to ask our PRC subsidiary that is a party to the exclusive call option agreement with the VIE’s shareholders, to designate another PRC person or entity to acquire the equity interests in such VIE and replace the existing shareholders pursuant to the exclusive call option agreement.

In addition, in the registration forms of the local branch of the SAIC for the pledges over the equity interests under the equity pledge agreements, the amount of registered equity interests pledged to our PRC subsidiary was stated as the pledgor’s portion of the registered capital of the VIE. The equity pledge agreements with the shareholders of our VIEs provide that the pledged equity interest constitute continuing security for any and all of the indebtedness, obligations and liabilities of our VIEs under the relevant contractual arrangements, and therefore the scope of pledge should not be limited by the amount of the registered capital of the applicable VIE. However, there is no guarantee that a PRC court will not take the position that the amount listed on the equity pledge registration forms represents the full amount of the collateral that has been registered and perfected. If this is the case, the obligations that are supposed to be secured in the equity pledge agreements in excess of the amount listed on the equity pledge registration forms could be determined by the PRC court to be unsecured debt, which takes last priority among creditors and often does not have to be paid back at all. We do not have agreements that pledge the assets of our VIEs and their respective subsidiaries for the benefit of us or our PRC subsidiaries, although our VIEs grant our PRC subsidiaries options to purchase the assets of our VIEs and their equity interests in their subsidiaries under the exclusive call option agreements.

If any of our VIEs and their subsidiaries becomes the subject of a bankruptcy or liquidation proceeding, we may lose the ability to use and enjoy their assets, which could reduce the size of our operations and materially and adversely affect our business.

We do not have priority pledges and liens against the assets of our VIEs. As a contractual and property right matter, this lack of priority pledges and liens has remote risks. If Shanghai Jupai or Shanghai E-Cheng undergoes an involuntary liquidation proceeding, third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of its assets and we may not have priority against such third-party creditors on the assets of our VIEs. If our VIEs liquidate, we may take part in the liquidation procedures as a general creditor under the PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law and recover any outstanding liabilities owed by Shanghai Jupai to Shanghai Juxiang or by Shanghai E-Cheng to Shanghai Baoyi under the applicable service agreement.

If the shareholders of our VIEs were to attempt to voluntarily liquidate our VIEs without obtaining our prior consent, we could effectively prevent such unauthorized voluntary liquidation by exercising our right to request the shareholders of our VIEs to transfer all of their respective equity ownership interests to a PRC entity or individual designated by us in accordance with the option agreement with the shareholders of our VIEs. In addition, under the operation agreement signed by Shanghai Juxiang, Shanghai Jupai and its shareholders and according to the PRC Property Law, the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai do not have the right to issue dividends to themselves or otherwise distribute the retained earnings or other assets of Shanghai Jupai without our consent. Similarly, the shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng do not have the right to issue dividends to themselves or otherwise distribute the retained earnings or other assets of Shanghai E-Cheng without our consent. In the event that the shareholders of our VIEs initiate a voluntary liquidation proceeding without our authorization or attempts to distribute the retained earnings or assets of our VIEs without our prior consent, we may need to resort to legal proceedings to enforce the terms of the contractual arrangements. Any such litigation may be costly and may divert our management’s time and attention away from the operation of our business, and the outcome of such litigation will be uncertain.

Our contractual arrangements with our VIEs may result in adverse tax consequences to us.

As a result of our corporate structure and the contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiaries, our VIEs, their respective shareholders and us, we are effectively subject to the PRC value-added tax at rates from 5%3% to 6% and related surcharges on revenues generated by our subsidiaries from our contractual arrangements with our VIEs. The PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law requires every enterprise in China to submit its annual enterprise income tax return together with a report on transactions with its affiliates or related parties to the relevant tax authorities. These transactions may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities within ten years after the taxable year during which the transactions are conducted. We may be subject to adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities were to determine that the contracts between us and our VIEs were not on an arm’s length basis and therefore constitute a favorable transfer pricing arrangements. If this occurs, the PRC tax authorities could request that our VIEs and any of its respective subsidiaries adjust their taxable income upward for PRC tax purposes. Such a pricing adjustment could adversely affect us by reducing expense deductions recorded by such VIE and thereby increasing the VIE’s tax liabilities, which could subject the VIE to late payment fees and other penalties for the underpayment of taxes. Our consolidated net income may be materially and adversely affected if our VIEs’ tax liabilities increase or if either of them becomes subject to late payment fees or other penalties.

Substantial uncertainties exist with respect to the enactment timetable, interpretation and implementation of draft PRC Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance, business operations and financial results.

The Ministry of Commerce, or the MOFCOM, published a discussion draft of the proposed Foreign Investment Law in January 2015 aiming to, upon its enactment, replace the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The draft Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. While the MOFCOM solicited comments on this draft earlier this year, substantial uncertainties exist with respect to its enactment timetable, interpretation and implementation. The draft Foreign Investment Law, if enacted as proposed, may materially impact the entire legal framework regulating foreign investments in China and may also impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance, business operations and financial results to some extent.

Among other things, the draft Foreign Investment Law expands the definition of foreign investment and introduces the principle of “actual control” in determining whether a company is considered a foreign-invested enterprise, or an FIE. The draft Foreign Investment Law specifically provides that an entity established in China but “controlled” by foreign investors will be treated as an FIE, whereas an entity set up in a foreign jurisdiction would nonetheless be, upon market entry clearance by the MOFCOM, treated as a PRC domestic investor provided that the entity is “controlled” by PRC entities and/or citizens. In this connection, “control” is broadly defined in the draft law to cover any of the following summarized categories: (i) holding 50% or more of the voting rights or similar equity interest of the subject entity; (ii) holding less than 50% of the voting rights or similar equity interest of the subject entity but having the power to secure at least 50% of the seats on the board or other equivalent decision making bodies, or having the voting power to exert material influence on the board, the shareholders’ meeting or other equivalent decision making bodies; or (iii) having the power to exert decisive influence, via contractual or trust arrangements, over the subject entity’s operations, financial matters or other key aspects of business operations. Once an entity is determined to be an FIE, and if its investment amount exceeds certain thresholds or if its business operation falls within a “negative list” to be separately issued by the State Council in the future, market entry clearance by the MOFCOM or its local counterparts will be required. Otherwise, all foreign investors may make investments on the same terms as Chinese investors without being subject to additional approval from the government authorities as mandated by the existing foreign investment legal regime.

The “variable interest entity” structure, or VIE structure, has been adopted by many PRC-based companies, including us, to obtain necessary licenses and permits in the industries that are currently subject to foreign investment restrictions in China. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating certain of our operations in China do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations” and “History and Development of the Company.” Under the draft Foreign Investment Law, a VIE that is controlled via contractual arrangements will also be deemed as an FIE, if it is ultimately “controlled” by foreign investors. Therefore, for companies with a VIE structure in an industry category that is on the “negative list,” the existing VIE structure may be deemed legitimate only if the ultimate controlling person(s) is/are of PRC nationality (either PRC state owned enterprises or agencies, or PRC citizens). Conversely, if the actual controlling person(s) is/are of foreign nationalities, then the VIE will be treated as an FIE and any operation in the industry category on the “negative list” without market entry clearance may be found illegal.

The draft Foreign Investment Law has not taken a position on what will happen to the existing companies with a VIE structure, although a few possible options were proffered at the comment solicitation stage. Under these options, a company with VIE structures and in the business on the “negative list” at the time of enactment of the new Foreign Investment Law has either the option or obligation to disclose its corporate structure to the authorities, while the authorities, after reviewing the ultimate control structure of the company, may either permit the company to continue its business by maintaining the VIE structure (when the company is deemed ultimately controlled by PRC citizens), or require the company to dispose of its businesses and/or VIE structure based on circumstantial considerations. Moreover, it is uncertain whether the market survey services and the direct sales of mutual fund and asset management plans that we operate or plan to operate through our consolidated entities, will be subject to the foreign investment restrictions or prohibitions set forth in the “negative list” to be issued. If the enacted version of the Foreign Investment Law and the final “negative list” mandate further actions, such as MOFCOM market entry clearance, to be completed by companies with existing VIE structure like us, we will face uncertainties as to whether such clearance can be timely obtained, or at all. Furthermore, due to lack of guidance under this draft law, we are unable to ascertain the controlling status of our company although no more than 50% of the total share capital of our company is held on record by PRC residents, and we cannot assure you of the controlling status of our company after the completion of our initial public offering. If we are not considered as ultimately controlled by PRC domestic investors, further actions required to be taken by us under the enacted Foreign Investment Law may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The draft Foreign Investment Law, if enacted as proposed, may also materially impact our corporate governance practice and increase our compliance costs. For instance, the draft Foreign Investment Law imposes stringent ad hoc and periodic information reporting requirements on foreign investors and the applicable FIEs. Aside from investment implementation report and investment amendment report that are required at each investment and alteration of investment specifics, an annual report is mandatory, and large foreign investors meeting certain criteria are required to report on a quarterly basis. Any company found to be non-compliant with these information reporting obligations may potentially be subject to fines and/or administrative or criminal liabilities, and the persons directly responsible may be subject to criminal liabilities.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

Adverse changes in the political and economic policies of the PRC government could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China, which could adversely affect our business.

Substantially all of our assets are located in China and substantially all of our revenues are derived from our operations there. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects are affected significantly by economic, political and legal developments in China. The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the Chinese economy has experienced significant growth in the past 30 years, the growth has been uneven across different periods, regions and among various economic sectors of China and the rate of growth has been slowing. We cannot assure you that the Chinese economy will continue to grow, or that if there is growth, such growth will be steady and uniform, or that if there is a slowdown, such slowdown will not have a negative effect on our business.

The PRC government also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policies and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. From late 2003 to mid-2008, the PRC government implemented a number of measures, such as increasing the People’s Bank of China’s statutory deposit reserve ratio and imposing commercial bank lending guidelines that had the effect of slowing the growth of credit, which in turn may have slowed the growth of the Chinese economy. In response to the recent global and Chinese economic downturn, the PRC government has promulgated several measures aimed at expanding credit and stimulating economic growth. Since August 2008, the People’s Bank of China has decreased the statutory deposit reserve ratio and lowered benchmark interest rates several times. Beginning in January 2010, however, the People’s Bank of China started to take measures including increasing the statutory deposit reserve ratio and raised the benchmark interest rates several times in response to rapid growth of credit in 2009 and 2010. Since January 2011, the People’s Bank of China has continually increased the statutory deposit reserve ratio and raising the benchmark interest rates. The increasing trend eased in December 2011 and the statutory deposit reserve ratio was reduced twice in February and May 2012. In addition, in July 2013, the People’s Bank of China revoked the restriction on loan interest rate of financial institutions. It is unclear whether PRC economic policies will be effective in stimulating growth, and the PRC government may not be effective in achieving stable economic growth in the future. Any slowdown in the economic growth of China could lead to reduced demand for the products we distribute or manage, which could materially and adversely affect our business, as well as our financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.

The PRC legal system is based on written statutes and court decisions have limited precedential value. The PRC legal system is evolving rapidly, and the interpretation of many laws, regulations and rules may contain inconsistencies and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. However, since PRC judicial and administrative authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory provisions and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to predict the outcome of a judicial or administrative proceeding than in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based, in part, on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published in a timely manner, or at all, but which may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not always be aware of any potential violation of these policies and rules. Such unpredictability towards our contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights could adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

We may be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulation of financial services businesses, service providers and financial products we distribute.

The PRC government extensively regulates the financial services industry, including foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements pertaining to, companies in the financial services industry, including wealth management and asset management companies. These financial service-related laws and regulations are evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainty. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violations of applicable laws and regulations. Issues, risks and uncertainties relating to PRC regulation of the financial services business include, but are not limited to, the following:

·                  There are uncertainties related to the regulation of the wealth management and asset management business in China, including evolving licensing practices. Operations at some of our subsidiaries and consolidated entities may be subject to challenge, or we may fail to obtain permits or licenses that may be deemed necessary for our operations or we may not be able to obtain or renew certain permits or licenses. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business and Industry — We may fail to obtain and maintain licenses and permits necessary to conduct our operations in China, and our business may be materially and adversely affected as a result of any changes in the laws and regulations governing the financial services industry in China” and “PRC Regulation.”

·                  The evolving PRC regulatory system for the financial service industry may lead to the establishment of new regulatory agencies. If these new laws, regulations or policies are promulgated, additional licenses may be required for our operations. If our operations do not comply with these new regulations after they become effective, or if we fail to obtain any licenses required under these new laws and regulations, we could be subject to penalties.

The interpretation and application of existing PRC laws, regulations and policies and possible new laws, regulations or policies relating to the financial services industry have created substantial uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, financial services businesses in China, including our business. There are also risks that we may be found in violation of existing or future laws and regulations given the uncertainty and complexity of China’s regulation of financial services business.

Besides, the regulations relating to financial services or products may change, and as a result we may be required to discontinue the supply of certain wealth management products that we currently distribute or cease managing certain products in our asset management business.

Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The value of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by changes in China’s political and economic conditions and by China’s foreign exchange policies, among other things. In July 2005, the PRC government changed its decades-old policy of pegging the value of Renminbi to the U.S. dollar, and Renminbi appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and the exchange rate between Renminbi and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policies may impact the exchange rate between Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.

To the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for capital expenditures and working capital and other business purposes, appreciation of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on Renminbi amount we would receive from the conversion. Conversely, if we decide to convert Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs, strategic acquisitions or investments or other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us.

The reporting and functional currency of our company is the U.S. dollar. However, the functional currency of our consolidated operating subsidiaries and consolidated entities is Renminbi and substantially all their revenues and expenses are denominated in Renminbi. Substantially all of our sales contracts, costs and expenses were denominated in Renminbi, and substantially all ofwhile our costs and expensesdividend payments are denominated in Renminbi. Fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily those involvingU.S. dollars. We have not used any forward contracts or currency borrowings to hedge our exposure to foreign currency risk. Any significant revaluation of the Renminbi or the U.S. dollar may adversely affect the relative purchasing power of these proceeds. In addition, appreciation or depreciation inour cash flows, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our ADSs. For example, an appreciation of the Renminbi relative toagainst the U.S. dollar would affect our financial results reported inmake any new RMB-denominated investments or expenditures more costly to us, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for such purposes. An appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar terms without giving effect to any underlying changewould also result in foreign currency translation losses for financial reporting purposes when we translate our business or results of operations. Fluctuations in the exchange rate will also affect the relative value of earnings from, and the value of. any U.S. dollar-denominated financial assets into Renminbi. Conversely, if we decide to convert Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purposes of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs, or strategic acquisitions or investments we make inor other business purposes, appreciation of the future.U.S. dollar against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us.

Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

Governmental control of conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies may limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our revenues in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, our company may rely on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. Therefore, our PRC subsidiary is able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to us without prior approval from SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. But approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies, and we cannot assure you that the required governmental approval or registration can be obtained or completed in time when such capital needs arise, or at all. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders, including holders of our ADSs.

PRC regulation of loans to, and direct investment in, PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may restrict or prevent us from using the proceeds of our initial public offering to make loans to our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated entities or to make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, which may materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

We are an offshore holding company conducting our operations in China through our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated entities. In utilizing the proceeds that we will receive from our initial public offering, we are permitted under PRC laws and regulations as an offshore holding company to provide funding to our PRC subsidiaries only through loans or capital contributions and to our consolidated entities only through loans.

Any loans by us to our PRC subsidiary, which is treated as foreign-invested enterprises under PRC law, are subject to PRC regulations and foreign exchange loan registrations. For example, loans by us to our wholly owned PRC subsidiary to finance their activities cannot exceed statutory limits and must be registered with the local counterpart of the SAFE. If we decide to finance our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries by means of capital contributions, these capital contributions must be filed with or approved by the MOFCOM or its local counterpart. We may also extend loans to our consolidated entities, which are treated as PRC domestic companies under PRC law, and loans with a term more than one year must be approved by the National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, and must also be registered with the SAFE or its local branches, loans with term less than one year must be approved by the SAFE or its local branches.

The SAFE promulgated a circular on November 19, 2010, known as Circular No. 59, which tightens the examination of the authenticity of settlement of net proceeds from our initial public offering and requires that the settlement of net proceeds shall be in accordance with the description in this annual report.

On March 30, 2015, the SAFE issued the Circular on Reform of the Administrative Rules of the Payment and Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19, which became effective on June 1, 2015. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 19, foreign-invested enterprises may either continue to follow the current payment-based foreign currency settlement system or elect to follow the “conversion-at-will” regime of foreign currency settlement. Where a foreign-invested enterprise follows the conversion-at-will regime of foreign currency settlement, it may convert part or all of the amount of the foreign currency in its capital account into Renminbi at any time. The converted Renminbi will be kept in a designated account labeled as settled but pending payment, and if the foreign-invested enterprise needs to make payment from such designated account, it still needs to go through the review process with its bank and provide necessary supporting documents. SAFE Circular 19, therefore, has substantially lifted the restrictions on the usage by a foreign-invested enterprise of its RMB registered capital converted from foreign currencies. According to SAFE Circular 19, such Renminbi capital may be used at the discretion of the foreign-invested enterprise and the SAFE will eliminate the prior approval requirement and only examine the authenticity of the declared usage afterwards. Nevertheless, foreign-invested enterprises like our PRC subsidiary are still not allowed to extend intercompany loans to our PRC consolidated entities. In addition, as Circular 19 was promulgated recently, there remain substantial uncertainties with respect to the interpretation and implementation of this circular by relevant authorities.

In light of the various requirements imposed by PRC regulations on loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies, including SAFE Circular 142,19, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary government registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries or consolidated entities or with respect to future capital contributions by us to our PRC subsidiary. Our failure to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals may negatively affect our ability to use the proceeds we receive from our initial public offering and to capitalize or otherwise fund operations of our PRC operating entities, Shanghai Juxiang and Shanghai Jupai, and any other new subsidiaries we may establish in the future for business purposes, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated entities are subject to restrictions on paying dividends or making other payments to us, which may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

We are a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. We rely on dividends from our PRC subsidiaries as well as consulting and other fees paid to us by our consolidated entities for our cash and financing requirements, such as the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders, including holders of our ADSs, and service any debt we may incur. Current PRC regulations permit our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, our PRC subsidiary is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits after making up previous years’ accumulated losses each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds until the total amount set aside reaches 50% of its registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Furthermore, if our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated entities incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us, which may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

In addition, the EIT Law and its implementation rules provide that withholding tax rate of 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by PRC companies to non-PRC-resident enterprises unless otherwise exempted or reduced according to treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC-resident enterprises are incorporated.

China’s M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations establish complex procedures for some acquisitions of PRC companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or M&A Rules, and other recently adopted regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time consuming and complex. For example, the M&A Rules require that the MOFCOM be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise, if (i) any important industry is concerned, (ii) such transaction involves factors that impact or may impact national economic security, or (iii) such transaction will lead to a change in control of a domestic enterprise which holds a famous trademark or PRC time-honored brand. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on August 30, 2007 and effective as of August 1, 2008 requires that transactions which are deemed concentrations and involve parties with specified turnover thresholds (i.e., during the previous fiscal year, (i) the total global turnover of all operators participating in the transaction exceeds RMB10.0 billion (US$1.61.4 billion) and at least two of these operators each had a turnover of more than RMB400.0 million (US$65.257.6 million) within China, or (ii) the total turnover within China of all the operators participating in the concentration exceeded RMB2.0 billion (US$0.3 billion), and at least two of these operators each had a turnover of more than RMB400.0 million (US$65.257.6 million) within China) must be cleared by the MOFCOM before they can be completed. In addition, on February 3, 2011, the General Office of the State Council promulgated a Notice on Establishing the Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the Circular 6, which officially established a security review system for mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises by foreign investors. Further, on August 25, 2011, the MOFCOM promulgated the Regulations on Implementation of Security Review System for the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the MOFCOM Security Review Regulations, which became effective on September 1, 2011, to implement the Circular 6. Under Circular 6, a security review is required for mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors having “national defense and security” concerns and mergers and acquisitions by which foreign investors may acquire the “de facto control” of domestic enterprises with “national security” concerns. Under the MOFCOM Security Review Regulations, the MOFCOM will focus on the substance and actual impact of the transaction when deciding whether a specific merger or acquisition is subject to security review. If the MOFCOM decides that a specific merger or acquisition is subject to security review, it will submit it to the Inter-Ministerial Panel, an authority established under the Circular 6 led by the NDRC and the MOFCOM under the leadership of the State Council, to carry out security review. The regulations prohibit foreign investors from bypassing the security review by structuring transactions through trusts, indirect investments, leases, loans, control through contractual arrangements or offshore transactions. There is no explicit provision or official interpretation stating that the merging or acquisition of a company engaged in the wealth management or asset management business requires security review.

In the future, we may grow our business by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the MOFCOM or its local counterparts may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions. The M&A Rules requires a foreign investor to obtain the approval from the MOFCOM or its local counterpart only upon (i) its acquisition of a domestic enterprise’s equity interest; (ii) its subscription of the increased capital of a domestic enterprise; or (iii) establishes and operates a foreign-invested enterprise with assets acquired from a domestic enterprise. It is unclear whether our business would be deemed to be in an industry that raises “national defense and security” or “national security” concerns. However, the MOFCOM or other government agencies may publish explanations in the future determining that our business is in an industry subject to the security review, in which case our future acquisitions in China, including those by way of entering into contractual control arrangements with target entities, may be closely scrutinized or prohibited.

PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiary to liability or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiary, limit our PRC subsidiary’s ability to increase its registered capital or distribute profits to us, or may otherwise adversely affect us.

The SAFE has promulgated several regulations that require PRC residents and PRC corporate entities to register with and obtain approval from local branches of the SAFE in connection with their direct or indirect offshore investment activities. These regulations apply to our shareholders who are PRC residents and may apply to any offshore acquisitions that we make in the future.

Under these foreign exchange regulations, PRC residents who make, or have previously made, prior to the implementation of these foreign exchange regulations, direct or indirect investments in offshore companies will be required to register those investments. In addition, any PRC resident who is a direct or indirect shareholder of an offshore company is required to update the previously filed registration with the local branch of the SAFE, with respect to that offshore company, to reflect any material change involving its round-trip investment, capital variation, such as an increase or decrease in capital, transfer or swap of shares, merger or division. If any PRC shareholder fails to make the required registration or update the previously filed registration, the PRC subsidiary of that offshore parent company may be prohibited from distributing their profits and the proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to their offshore parent company, and the offshore parent company may also be prohibited from injecting additional capital into its PRC subsidiary. Moreover, failure to comply with the various foreign exchange registration requirements described above could result in liability under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions.

We have requested PRC residents holding direct or indirect interest in our company to our knowledge to make the necessary applications, filings and amendments as required by these foreign exchange regulations. Such PRC resident shareholders and beneficial owners have completed their initial registrations in relation to their ownership in our company and have also completed amendment registrations in relation to their subsequent ownership changes and the establishment of certain subsidiaries of our company required by foreign exchange regulations. However, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents holding direct or indirect interests in our company, and we cannot provide any assurances that all of our shareholders and beneficial owners who are PRC residents will make, obtain or update any applicable registrations or approvals required by these foreign exchange regulations. The failure or inability of our PRC resident shareholders to make such registration or truthfully disclose actual controllers of the round-trip enterprises may subject PRC residents to fines up to RMB300,000 in case of domestic institutions or RMB50,000 in case of domestic individuals. If the PRC resident shareholders do not complete their registration with the local SAFE branches, the PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to the offshore company, and the offshore company may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital to its PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with SAFE registration and amendment requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for violating applicable foreign exchange restrictions.

However, as there is uncertainty concerning the reconciliation of these foreign exchange regulations with other approval requirements, it is unclear how these regulations, and any future regulation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted, amended and implemented by the relevant government authorities. We cannot predict how these regulations will affect our business operations or future strategy. For example, we may be subject to a more stringent review and approval process with respect to our foreign exchange activities, such as remittance of dividends and foreign-currency-denominated borrowings, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we decide to acquire a PRC domestic company, we cannot assure you that we or the owners of such company, as the case may be, will be able to obtain the necessary approvals or complete the necessary filings and registrations required by the foreign exchange regulations. This may restrict our ability to implement our acquisition strategy and could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration of share options held by our employees who are “domestic individuals” may subject such employee or us to fines and legal or administrative sanctions.

Pursuant to Notices on Issues concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company issued by the SAFE in February 2012, or the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding the foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) participating in any stock incentive plan of an overseas listed company according to its stock incentive plan are required, through qualified PRC agents which could be the PRC subsidiary of such overseas-listed company, to register with the SAFE and complete certain other procedures related to the stock incentive plan.

We and our employees, who are “domestic individuals” and have been granted share options, or the PRC optionees, became subject to the Stock Incentive Plan Rules when our company became an overseas listed company upon the completion of our initial public offering. We have completed the registration as required under the Stock Incentive Plan Rules and other relevant SAFE registrations and plan to update the registration on an on-gong basis. If we or our PRC optionees fail to comply with the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, we and/or our PRC optionees may be subject to fines and other legal sanctions. We may also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional option plans for our directors and employees under PRC law. In addition, the General Administration of Taxation has issued a few circulars concerning employee stock options. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Our PRC subsidiary has obligations to file documents related to employee stock options with relevant tax authorities and withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their stock options. If our employees fail to pay and we fail to withhold their income taxes, we may face sanctions imposed by tax authorities or any other PRC government authorities. Furthermore, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and the Stock Incentive Plan Rules.

The discontinuation of any of the government incentives and preferential tax treatment currently available to us in China could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our VIE, Shanghai Jupai, was granted certain governmental subsidies and tax preferences in the last two years and these subsidies and tax preferences remain effective as of the date of this annual report.February 28, 2017. Pursuant to the letter agreement that we entered into with the local county government in January 2013, the local county government agreed to provide us subsidies based on the value-added tax, business tax and enterprise income tax for three years until January 2019. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, we received subsidies based on value-added tax, business tax, and enterprise income tax. Nevertheless, the government agencies may decide to reduce, eliminate or cancel subsidies at any time. We cannot assure you of the continued availability of the government incentives and subsidies currently enjoyed by Shanghai Juxiang and Shanghai Jupai. The discontinuation of these governmental incentives and subsidies could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulation of internet-related businesses and companies, and any lack of requisite approvals, licenses or permits applicable to our business may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We may be deemed as a provider of value-added communication services due to our ownership of the Jubaopen website and othersome of our websites.  The PRC government extensively regulates the internet industry, including foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements pertaining to, companies in the internet industry. These internet-related laws and regulations are relatively new and evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainties. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations.

The interpretation and application of existing PRC laws, regulations and policies and possible new laws, regulations or policies relating to the internet industry have created substantial uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, internet businesses in China, including our internet-based business. We cannot assure you that we have obtained all the permits or licenses required for conducting our business in China or will be able to maintain our existing licenses or obtain new ones. If the PRC government considers that we were operating without the proper approvals, licenses or permits or promulgates new laws and regulations that require additional approvals or licenses or imposes additional restrictions on the operation of any part of our business, it has the power, among other things, to levy fines, confiscate our income, revoke our business licenses, and require us to discontinue our relevant business or impose restrictions on the affected portion of our business. Any of these actions by the PRC government may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiary may be subject to PRC tax under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.

Pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its amendment, or the EIT Law, dividends generated after January 1, 2008 and payable by a foreign-invested enterprise in China to its foreign investors are subject to a 10% withholding tax, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. We are a Cayman Islands holding company and substantially all of our income may come from dividends we receive, directly or indirectly, from our wholly foreign-owned PRC subsidiary. Since there is currently no such tax treaty between China and the Cayman Islands, dividends we directly receive from our wholly foreign-owned PRC subsidiary will generally be subject to a 10% withholding tax.

In addition, under the Arrangement between China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income, where a Hong Kong resident enterprise which is considered a non-PRC tax resident enterprise directly holds at least 25% of a PRC enterprise, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by such PRC enterprise to such Hong Kong resident enterprise is reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%, subject to approval of the PRC local tax authority. Accordingly, Jupai HongKong Investment Limited, or Jupai HK, and Scepter HoldingHoldings Limited may be able to enjoy the 5% withholding tax rate for the dividends it receives from Shanghai Juxiang and Shanghai Baoyi, respectively, if they satisfy the conditions prescribed in relevant tax rules and regulations, and obtain the approvals as required. However, if the Hong Kong resident enterprise is not considered to be the beneficial owner of such dividends under applicable PRC tax regulations, such dividends may remain subject to withholding tax at a rate of 10%. If Jupai HK or Sceptor HoldingScepter Holdings Limited is considered to be a non-beneficial owner for purposes of the tax arrangement, any dividends paid to them by our wholly foreign-owned PRC subsidiary directly would not qualify for the preferential dividend withholding tax rate of 5%, but rather would be subject to a rate of 10%. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Regulations — Regulations on Tax — Dividend Withholding Tax”.

Furthermore, under the EIT Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of China with “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a PRC resident enterprise and will be subject to the enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Regulations — Regulations on Tax — PRC Enterprise Income Tax.” We do not believe that we or any of our respective subsidiaries outside of China would be a PRC resident enterprise as of the date of this annual report.February 28, 2017. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body”. If the PRC tax authorities determine that we were a PRC resident enterprise for tax purposes, we would be subject to a 25% enterprise income tax on their global income. In addition, if we were considered a PRC resident enterprise for tax purposes, we may be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-PRC resident enterprises, including the holders of our ADSs. Furthermore, non-PRC resident enterprise shareholders (including our ADS holders) may be subject to a 10% PRC tax on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, if such income is treated as sourced from within China. It is unclear whether our non-PRC individual shareholders (including our ADS holders) would be subject to any PRC tax on dividends or gains obtained by such non-PRC individual shareholders in the event we are determined to be a PRC resident enterprise. If any PRC tax were to apply to such dividends or gains, it would generally apply at a rate of 20% unless a reduced rate is available under an applicable tax treaty. However, it is also unclear whether our non-PRC shareholders would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and China in the event that we are considered as a PRC resident enterprise.

If we were required under the EIT Law to withhold such PRC income tax, your investment in our ordinary shares or ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises or other assets attributed to a PRC establishment of a non-PRC company, or immovable properties located in China owned by a non-PRC company.

We face uncertainties on the reporting and consequences on private equity financing transactions, private share exchange transactions and private transfer of shares, including private transfer of public shares, in our company by non-resident investors. According to the Notice on Strengthening Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises issued by the PRC State Administration of Taxation on December 10, 2009, or SAT Circular 698, where a non-resident enterprise transfers the equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise indirectly through a disposition of equity interests in an overseas holding company, or an Indirect Transfer, the non-resident enterprise, as the seller, may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax of up to 10% of the gains derived from the Indirect Transfer in certain circumstances.

On February 3, 2015, the SAT issued Announcement on Several Issues Concerning the Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Property Transfers by Non-RPC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Notice No. 7, to supersede the existing tax rules in relation to the tax treatment of the Indirect Transfer, while the other provisions of SAT Circular 698 that are irrelevant to the Indirect Transfer remain in force. SAT Notice No. 7 introduces a new tax regime and extends the SAT’s tax jurisdiction to capture not only the Indirect Transfer as set forth under SAT Circular 698 but also transactions involving indirect transfer of (i) real properties in China and (ii) assets of an “establishment or place” situated in China, by a non-PRC resident enterprise through a disposition of equity interests in an overseas holding company. SAT Notice No. 7 also extends the interpretation with respect to the disposition of equity interests in an overseas holding company. In addition, SAT Notice No. 7 further clarifies how to assess reasonable commercial purposes and introduces safe harbors applicable to internal group restructurings. However, it also brings challenges to both the foreign transferor and transferee as they are required to make self-assessment on whether an Indirect Transfer or similar transaction should be subject to PRC tax and whether they should file or withhold any tax payment accordingly.

However, as these notices are relatively new and there is a lack of clear statutory interpretation, we face uncertainties on the reporting and consequences on future private equity financing transactions, share exchange or other transactions involving the transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC resident enterprises, or sale or purchase of shares in other non-PRC resident companies or other taxable assets by us. Our company and other non-resident enterprises in our group may be subject to filing obligations or being taxed if our company and other non-resident enterprises in our group are transferors in such transactions, and may be subject to withholding obligations if our company and other non-resident enterprises in our group are transferees in such transactions. For the transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC resident enterprises, our PRC subsidiaries may be requested to assist in the filing under the rules and notices. We may be required to expend costly resources to comply with SAT Circular 698 and SAT Notice No. 7, or to establish a case to be tax exempt under SAT Circular 698 and SAT Notice No. 7, which may cause us to incur additional costs and may have a negative impact on the value of your investment in us.

The PRC tax authorities have discretion under SAT Circular 698 and SAT Notice No. 7 to make adjustments to the taxable capital gains based on the difference between the fair value of the transferred equity interests and the investment cost. We may pursue acquisitions in the future that may involve complex corporate structures. If we are considered as a non-PRC resident enterprise under the EIT Law and if the PRC tax authorities make adjustments to the taxable income of the transactions under SAT Circular 698 and SAT Notice No. 7, our income tax expenses associated with such potential acquisitions will be increased, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If the custodians or authorized users of controlling non-tangible assets of our company, including our corporate chops and seals, fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets, our business and operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Under PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including contracts such as consulting service agreements we enter into with wealth management product providers, which are important to our business, are executed using the chops or seals of the signing entity, or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with the relevant branch of the SAIC.

Although we usually utilize chops to enter into contracts, the designated legal representatives of each of our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated entities have the power to enter into contracts on behalf of such entities without chops and bind such entities. All designated legal representatives of our PRC subsidiary and consolidated entities, except the three asset management companies under Shanghai Juzhou are members of our senior management team and have signed employment undertaking letters with us or our PRC subsidiary and consolidated entities under which they agree to abide by various duties they owe to us. In order to maintain the physical security of our chops and the chops of our PRC entities, we generally store these items in secured locations accessible only by the authorized personnel of each of our PRC subsidiary and consolidated entities. Although we monitor such authorized personnel, there is no assurance such procedures will prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. Accordingly, if any of our authorized personnel misuse or misappropriate our corporate chops or seals, we could encounter difficulties in maintaining control over the relevant entities and experience significant disruption to our operations. If a designated legal representative obtains control of the chops in an effort to obtain control over any of our PRC subsidiary or consolidated entities, we, our PRC subsidiary or consolidated entities would need to pass a new shareholder or board resolution to designate a new legal representative and we would need to take legal action to seek the return of the chops, apply for new chops with the relevant authorities, or otherwise seek legal redress for the violation of the representative’s fiduciary duties to us, which could involve significant time and resources and divert management attention away from our regular business. In addition, the affected entity may not be able to recover corporate assets that are sold or transferred out of our control in the event of such a misappropriation if a transferee relies on the apparent authority of the representative and acts in good faith.

Increases in labor costs and enforcement of stricter labor laws and regulations in China may adversely affect our business and our profitability.

China’s overall economy and the average wage in China have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to grow. The average wage level for our employees has also increased in recent years. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will continue to increase. Unless we are able to pass on these increased labor costs to the product providers or corporate borrowers who pay for our services, our profitability and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, we have been subject to stricter regulatory requirements in terms of entering labor contracts with our employees and paying various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and childbearing insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. Pursuant to the PRC Labor Contract Law, or the Labor Contract law, that became effective in January 2008, as amended on December 28, 2012 and effective as of July 1, 2013, and its implementation rules that became effective in September 2008, employers are subject to stricter requirements in terms of signing labor contracts, minimum wages, paying remuneration, determining the term of employees’ probation and unilaterally terminating labor contracts. In the event that we decide to terminate some of our employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, the Labor Contract Law and its implementation rules may limit our ability to effect those changes in a desirable or cost-effective manner, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. On October 28, 2010, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the PRC Social Insurance Law, or the Social Insurance Law, which became effective on July 1, 2011. According to the Social Insurance Law, employees must participate in pension insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance and the employers must, together with their employees or separately, pay the social insurance premiums for such employees.

As the interpretation and implementation of labor-related laws and regulations are still evolving, we cannot assure you that our employment practice do not and will not violate labor-related laws and regulations in China, which may subject us to labor disputes or government investigations. If we are deemed to have violated relevant labor laws and regulations, we could be required to provide additional compensation to our employees and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The audit report included in this annual report is prepared by an auditor who is not inspected by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, as such, you are deprived of the benefits of such inspection.

Auditors of companies that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC and traded publicly in the United States, including our independent registered public accounting firm, must be registered with the PCAOB, and are required by the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB to assess their compliance with the laws of the United States and professional standards. Because we have substantial operations within the People’s Republic of China and the PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections of the work of our auditors as it relates to those operations without the approval of the PRC authorities, our auditor’s work related to our operations in China is not currently inspected by the PCAOB.

This lack of PCAOB inspections of audit work performed in China prevents the PCAOB from regularly evaluating audit work of any auditors that was performed in China including that performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. As a result, investors may be deprived of the full benefits of PCAOB inspections.

The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of audit work performed in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit procedures as compared to auditors in other jurisdictions that are subject to PCAOB inspections on all of their work. Investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information and procedures and the quality of our financial statements.

Proceedings instituted in recent years by the SEC against certain PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

Starting in 2011, the PRC affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms (including our independent registered public accounting firm) were affected by a conflict between U.S. and Chinese law. Specifically, for certain U.S. listed companies operating and audited in mainland China, the SEC and the PCAOB sought to obtain from the PRC firms access to their audit work papers and related documents. The firms were, however, advised and directed that under the PRC law they could not respond directly to the U.S. regulators on those requests, and that requests by foreign regulators for access to such papers in China had to be channeled through the CSRC.

In late 2012, this impasse led the SEC to commence administrative proceedings under Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice and also under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 against the Chinese accounting firms, (including our independent registered public accounting firm). A first instance trial of the proceedings in July 2013 in the SEC’s internal administrative court resulted in an adverse judgment against the firms. The administrative law judge proposed penalties on the firms including a temporary suspension of their right to practice before the SEC, although that proposed penalty did not take effect pending review by the SEC. On February 6, 2015, before SEC’s review had taken place, the firms reached a settlement with the SEC. The settlement requires the firms to follow detailed procedures to seek to provide the SEC with access to PRC accounting firms’ audit documents via the CSRC. If they fail to meet specified criteria, the SEC retains the authority to impose a variety of additional remedial measures on the firms depending on the nature of the failure. Remedies for any future noncompliance could include, as appropriate, an automatic six-month bar on a single firm’s performance of certain audit work, commencement of a new proceeding against a firm, or in extreme cases the resumption of the current proceeding against all four firms.

In the event that the SEC restarts the administrative proceedings, depending upon the final outcome, listed companies in the United States with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in China, which could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, including possible delisting. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against these audit firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding PRC-based, United States-listed companies and the market price of our ADSs may be adversely affected.

If our independent registered public accounting firm were denied, even temporarily, the ability to practice before the SEC and we were unable to timely find another registered public accounting firm to audit and issue an opinion on our financial statements, our financial statements could be determined not to be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act. Such a determination could ultimately lead to the delisting of our ordinary shares from the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, or deregistration from the SEC, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our ADSs in the United States.

Risks Related to Our ADSs

The trading price of our ADSs is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.

Since our ADSs became listed on NYSE on July 16, 2015, theThe trading price of our ADSs has ranged from US$7.727.49 to US$11.5510.18 per ADS in 2015.2016. The trading price of our ADSs is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, like the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. A number of PRC companies have listed their securities on U.S. stock markets. The securities of some of these companies have experienced significant volatility, including price declines in connection with their initial public offerings. The trading performances of these PRC companies’ securities after their offerings may affect the attitudes of investors toward PRC companies listed in the United States in general and consequently may impact the trading performance of our ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance.

In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume for our ADSs may be highly volatile for factors specific to our own operations, including the following:

·                  variations in our revenues, earnings, cash flow and data related to our user base or user engagement;

·                  announcements of new investments, acquisitions, strategic partnerships or joint ventures by us or our competitors;

·                  announcements of new services and expansions by us or our competitors;

·                  changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

·                  detrimental adverse publicity about us or our industry;

·                  additions or departures of key personnel;

·                  release of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding equity securities or sales of additional equity securities; and

·                  potential litigation, regulatory investigations or regulatory developments that are perceived to be adverse to our business.

Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which our ADSs will trade.

In the past,From time to time, shareholders of public companies have often broughtbring securities class action suits against those companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, most significantly, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 for so long as we are an emerging growth company until the fifth anniversary from the date of our initial listing.

The JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company does not need to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards until such date that a private company is otherwise required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards. However, we have elected to “opt out” of thisthe later provision and, as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards as required when they are adopted for public companies. This decision to opt out of the extended transition period under the JOBS Act is irrevocable.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.

Because we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:

·                  the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K with the SEC;

·                  the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents, or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act;

·                  the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and

·                  the selective disclosure rules by issuers of material nonpublic information under Regulation FD.

We are required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the NYSE. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information, which would be made available to you, were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.

As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

As a Cayman Islands company listed on the NYSE, we are subject to the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. However, NYSE rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Currently, we rely on home country practice with respect to the shareholder approval requirement in respect of the establishment or material revision of an equity-compensation plan.plan and the requirements of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards that our compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee each be composed of independent directors. Our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under the NYSE corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

The sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of our ADSs could adversely affect their market price.

Sales of our ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our ADSs to decline. As of March 31, 2016,February 28, 2017, based on a review of our register of shareholders, we had 192,315,411193,720,706 ordinary shares outstanding (excluding the 4,297,38013,934,472 ordinary shares issued to our depositary bank for bulk issuance of ADSs reserved for future issuances upon the exercise or vesting of awards granted under our share incentive plan)plan and 1,189,965 unvested restricted shares). Among these shares, 39,816,07864,782,906 ordinary shares are in the form of ADSs, which are freely transferable without restriction or additional registration under the Securities Act. The remaining ordinary shares outstanding will be available for sale, subject to volume and other restrictions as applicable under Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act and the applicable lock-up agreements. Certain holders of our ordinary shares may cause us to register under the Securities Act the sale of their shares, subject to the applicable lock-up period. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would result in ADSs representing these shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration. Sales of these registered shares in the form of ADSs in the public market could cause the price of our ADSs to decline.

Because we domay not expectcontinue to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you mustmay need to rely on price appreciation of our ADSs as the sole source for return on your investment.

We currently intendAlthough we declared dividend on our ordinary shares in February 2017, we may not continue to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.so regularly, or at all. Therefore, you should notmay need to rely on an investment inprice appreciation of our ADSs as athe sole source for any future dividend income.return on your investment.

Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to applicable laws.our memorandum and articles of association and certain restrictions under Cayman Islands law. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either profit or share premium account, provided that in no circumstance may a dividend be paid if this would result in the Company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare dividends, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiary, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in our ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of our ADSs. There is no guarantee that our ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return onor your investment in our ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in our ADSs.

We are controlled by a small number of our existing shareholders, whose interests may differ from other shareholders, and our board of directors has the power to discourage a change of control.

As of March 31, 2016,February 28, 2017, our executive officers and directors, together with our shareholders existing before our initial public offering, beneficially own approximately 127,857,863141,344,645 ordinary shares, or 65.4%71.2% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Accordingly, our executive officers and directors, together with our shareholders existing before our initial public offering, could have significant influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to the shareholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. In cases where their interests are aligned and they vote together, these shareholders will also have the power to prevent or cause a change in control. Without the consent of some or all of these shareholders, we may be prevented from entering into transactions that could be beneficial to us. In addition, our directors and officers could violate their fiduciary duties by diverting business opportunities from us to themselves or others. The interests of our largest shareholders may differ from the interests of our other shareholders. The concentration in ownership of our ordinary shares may cause a material decline in the value of our ADSs.

Our memorandum and articles of association contain anti-takeover provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs.

Our currently effective memorandum and articles of association contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction. For example, our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our ordinary shares, in the form of ADS or otherwise. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of our ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.

We are an exempted company with limited liability incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time, the Companies Law (2013(2016 Revision) of the Cayman Islands and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under our articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

In addition, certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States.

As a result of all of the above, public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands and all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Substantially all of our current operations are conducted in China. In addition, a majority of our current directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. Substantially all of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons, or to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to vote your ordinary shares.

As a holder of our ADSs, you will only be able to exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you must vote by giving voting instructions to the depositary. Upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will vote the underlying ordinary shares in accordance with these instructions. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying shares unless you withdraw the shares. Under our fourth amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the minimum notice period required for convening a general meeting is seven calendar days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient advance notice to withdraw the shares underlying your ADSs to allow you to vote with respect to any specific matter. If we ask for your instructions, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote your shares. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may have no legal remedy if the shares underlying your ADSs are not voted as you requested.

Your rights to pursue claims against the depositary as a holder of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement.

Under the deposit agreement, any action or proceeding against or involving the depositary, arising out of or based upon the deposit agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby may only be instituted in a state or federal court in New York, New York, and pursuant to the deposit agreement, you, as a holder of our ADSs, will have irrevocably waived any objection which you may have to the laying of venue of any such proceeding, and irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in any such suit, action or proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the depositary may, in its sole discretion, require that any such action, controversy, claim, dispute, legal suit or proceeding be referred to and finally settled by an arbitration conducted under the terms described in the deposit agreement subject to certain exceptions solely related to the aspects of such claims that are related to U.S. securities law, in which case the resolution of such aspects may, at the option of such registered holder of the ADSs, remain in state or federal court in New York, New York. Also, we may amend or terminate the deposit agreement without your consent. If you continue to hold your ADSs after an amendment to the deposit agreement, you agree to be bound by the deposit agreement as amended.

You may not receive dividends or other distributions on our ordinary shares and you may not receive any value for them, if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to you.

The depositary of our ADSs has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on ordinary shares or other deposited securities underlying our ADSs, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, it would be unlawful to make a distribution to a holder of ADSs if it consists of securities that require registration under the Securities Act but that are not properly registered or distributed under an applicable exemption from registration. The depositary may also determine that it is not feasible to distribute certain property through the mail. Additionally, the value of certain distributions may be less than the cost of mailing them. In these cases, the depositary may determine not to distribute such property. We have no obligation to register under U.S. securities laws any ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or other securities received through such distributions. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of ADSs. This means that you may not receive distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you. These restrictions may cause a material decline in the value of our ADSs.

You may experience dilution of your holdings due to inability to participate in rights offerings.

We may, from time to time, distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire securities. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not distribute rights to holders of ADSs unless the distribution and sale of rights and the securities to which these rights relate are either exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs, or are registered under the provisions of the Securities Act. The depositary may, but is not required to, attempt to sell these undistributed rights to third parties, and may allow the rights to lapse. We may be unable to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, and we are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to these rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to have a registration statement declared effective. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution of their holdings as a result.

You may be subject to limitations on transfer of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including in connection with corporate events such as a rights offering, during which time the depositary needs to maintain an exact number of ADS holders on its books for a specified period. The depositary may also close its books in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of our ADSs generally when our share register or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.

We incur increased costs as a result of being a public company, particularly after we cease to qualify as an “emerging growth company.”

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the NYSE, impose various requirements on the corporate governance practices of public companies. As a company with less than US$1.0 billion in revenues for our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” pursuant to the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control over financial reporting and permission to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. However, we have elected to “opt out” of thisthe latter provision and, as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards as required when they are adopted for public companies. This decision to opt out of the extended transition period under the JOBS Act is irrevocable.

We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. After we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we will need to increase the number of independent directors and adopthave adopted policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. We also expect that operating as a public company will make it more difficultprocedures and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incurincurred substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage.coverage of directors and officers liability insurance. In addition, as a public company, we will incurhave incurred additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. It may also be more difficult for usrequirements and additional costs to findhave qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we cannot predict or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

In the past, shareholders of a public company often brought securities class action suits against the company following periods of instability in the market price of that company’s securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations, which could harm our results of operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We mayThere is a significant risk that we will be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes, which could subject United States investors in our ADSs or ordinary shares to significant adverse United States income tax consequences.

We will be classified as a “passive foreign investment company,” or “PFIC” if, in the case of any particular taxable year, either (a) 75% or more of our gross income for such year consists of certain types of “passive” income or (b) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of our assets (as determined on the basis of fair market value) during such year produce or are held for the production of passive income (the “asset test”). Although

Based on the law in this regard is unclear,market price of our ADSs and the composition of our assets (in particular the retention of a substantial amount of cash), we treat our consolidated entities as being owned by usbelieve that we were a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes not only because we exercise effective control over the operation of such entities but also because we are entitled to substantially all of their economic benefits, and, as a result, we consolidate their results of operations infor our consolidated financial statements. Assuming that we are the owner of our consolidated entities for United States federal income tax purposes, and based upon our income and assets and the value of our ADSs, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2015, because the value of2016, and we will very likely be a PFIC for our assets for purposes of the asset test will generally be determined by reference tocurrent taxable year ending December 31, 2017 unless the market price of our ADSs fluctuationsincreases and/or we invest a substantial amount of the cash and other passive assets we hold in the market price of our ADSs may cause us to become a PFICassets that produce or are held for the current or subsequent taxable years. The determinationproduction of whether we will be or become a PFIC will also depend, in part, on the composition of our income and assets, which will be affected by how, and how quickly, we use our liquid assets and the cash raised in our initial public offering. Under circumstances where we determine not to deploy significant amounts of cash for active purposes, our risk of being classified as a PFIC may substantially increase. Because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules and PFIC status is a factual determination made annually after the close of each taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for the current taxable year or any future taxable year.income.

If we are classified as a PFIC in any taxable year, a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Taxation“Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation — United States Federal Income Taxation”) may incur significantly increased United States income tax on gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the ADSs or ordinary shares and on the receipt of distributions on the ADSs or ordinary shares to the extent such gain or distribution is treated as an “excess distribution” under the United States federal income tax rules and such holders willU.S. Holders may be subject to burdensome reporting requirements. Further, if we are classified as a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. Holder holds our ADSs or ordinary shares, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which such U.S. Holder holds our ADSs or ordinary shares. We do not intend to provide information necessary for U.S. Holders to make qualified electing fund elections which, if available, would result in tax treatment different (and generally less adverse than) the general tax treatment for PFICs. For more information see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation — United States Federal Income Taxation — Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations.Rules.”

If we were deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, applicable restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our business and the price of our ADSs and ordinary shares.

We are not an “investment company” and do not intend to become registered as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act, because our primary business is the provision of wealth management services complemented by our asset management services.

Generally, a company is an “investment company” if it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities or owns or proposes to own investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, unless an exception, exemption or safe harbor applies. We seek to conduct our business activities to comply with this test. As a foreign private issuer, we would not be eligible to register under the Investment Company Act, and if a sufficient amount of our assets are deemed to be “investment securities” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act, we would either have to obtain exemptive relief from the SEC, modify our contractual rights or dispose of investments in order to fall outside the definition of an investment company. Additionally, we may have to forego potential future acquisitions of interests in companies that may be deemed to be investment securities within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. Failure to avoid being deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act coupled with our inability as a foreign private issuer to register under the Investment Company Act could make us unable to comply with our reporting obligations as a public company in the United States and lead to our being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, which would have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and value of our ADSs and ordinary shares.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A.History and Development of the Company

We commenced operations in July 2010 through Shanghai Jupai Investment Group Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Jupai, in China. In August 2012, we incorporated Jupai Investment Group as our offshore holding company in the Cayman Islands and changed our name from Jupai Investment Group to Jupai Holdings Limited, or Jupai, in December 2014. In August 2012, we also established Jupai HongKong Investment Limited, or Jupai HK, in Hong Kong, which is wholly owned by Jupai.

In November 2013, we established Jupai Investment International Limited, or Jupai BVI, in the British Virgin Islands and transferred the shares of Jupai HK from Jupai to Jupai BVI in January 2014.

Due to lack of express permission under PRC law for foreign-invested enterprises to sell mutual fund products or asset management plans and to provide asset management services in China, we provide asset management services and plan to sell mutual fund products and asset management plans through the subsidiaries of Shanghai Jupai, a domestic PRC company. In July 2013, we established Shanghai Juxiang Investment Management Consulting Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Juxiang, our wholly-owned subsidiary in China. Shanghai Juxiang has entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Shanghai Jupai and its shareholders. The contractual arrangements between Shanghai Juxiang and Shanghai Jupai and its shareholders enable us to (1) exercise effective control over Shanghai Jupai; (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of Shanghai Jupai in consideration for the consulting services provided by Shanghai Juxiang; and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all of the equity interests in Shanghai Jupai when and to the extent permitted under PRC laws and regulations.

As a result of these contractual arrangements, we are considered the primary beneficiary of Shanghai Jupai, and we treat it as our VIE under U.S. GAAP. We have consolidated the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows that are directly attributable to Shanghai Jupai and its subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

In 2013, in conjunction with the establishment of Shanghai Juxiang, we completed an internal business migration whereby almost all of our wealth management advisory services personnel became employees of Shanghai Juxiang. We also started to use Shanghai Juxiang as the operating entity of our wealth management advisory services business that are not subject to foreign investment restrictions. After this internal business migration, Shanghai Juxiang is a party to the business contracts related to our wealth management advisory services and is the entity that receives one-time commissions and recurring service fees from this business. This internal migration caused no substantive change in the management or operation of the relevant business because those business operations remain under the leadership of the same management team of our company and are operated through almost identical wealth management advisory services personnel.

In July 2015, concurrently upon the completion of our initial public offering, we acquired Scepter Pacific, the holding company of E-House Capital.  As consideration, we issued 16,565,592 and 15,915,960 ordinary shares to E-House (China) Capital Investment Management Limited, or E-House Investment, and Reckon Capital Limited, respectively.  E-House Investment is a wholly owned subsidiary of E-House and Reckon Capital Limited is majority owned by Mr. Xin Zhou, our director.

E-House Capital’s business is conducted through Shanghai E-Cheng and its subsidiaries. Shanghai E-Cheng is a VIE of Scepter Pacific through the contractual arrangements between Shanghai Baoyi and Shanghai E-Cheng and its shareholders. The contractual arrangements between Shanghai Baoyi and Shanghai E-Cheng and its shareholders enable us to (1) exercise effective control over Shanghai E-Cheng; (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of Shanghai E-Cheng in consideration for the consulting services provided by Shanghai Baoyi; and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all of the equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng when and to the extent permitted under laws and regulations of People’s Republic of China.

As a result of these contractual arrangements, we treat Shanghai E-Cheng as our VIE under U.S. GAAP. We have consolidated the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows that are directly attributable to Shanghai E-Cheng and its subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

In January 2016, we issued 9,591,000 ordinary shares and 2,880,000 ordinary shares to Julius Baer Investment Ltd. and SINA, respectively, at US$1.83 per share, in a private placement.

In JanuaryMarch 2016, we acquired approximately 78%34% equity interest in Shanghai Yixun,and 70% earning distribution right of UP Capital Management Limited, which operates Jubaopen,directly holds 100% equity interest in Juhui Financial Securities Limited, a P2P internet finance company that connects potential borrowers with investors through offline storefrontsHong Kong entity holding the required license to provide financial services to the high-net-worth clients in China and online asset allocation platform.  We alsoHong Kong.

In March 2016, we entered into ana binding agreement to acquire approximately 71% of equity interests in Runju, a company primarily operates an online platform which facilitates the transfer of debt and equity securities, from Shanghai Kushuo Information Technology Limited and an individual shareholder approximately 28% and 43%, respectively, of the equity interests in Shanghai Runju Financial Information Services Co. Ltd., or Runju, which operates an online platform that facilitates the trading of debt and equity products.shareholder. The acquisition is still pending for further assessment by management. Shanghai Kushuo Information Technology Limited is a subsidiary of E-House.

In May 2016, we acquired 85% equity ownership of Non-Linear Investment Management Limited which directly holds 100% equity interest in Jucheng Insurance Broker Ltd., a Hong Kong entity holding the required license to provide the insurance brokerage services in Hong Kong.

In September 2016, we acquired 100% equity interest in Jiangsu Kangan Insurance Brokers Co. Ltd, a PRC entity holding the required license to provide the insurance brokerage services in China.

In connection with our acquisition of UP Capital Management Limited and Non-Linear Investment Management Limited in 2016, we also opened our Hong Kong office in May 2016 for purpose of expansion of our overseas business.

Our principal executive offices are located at Yinli Building, 8/F, 788 Guangzhong Road, Jingan District, Shanghai 200072, the People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number at this address is +86-21-6026-9003. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at the offices of Maples Corporate Services Limited at PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands.

B.Business Overview

We are a leading third-party wealth management service provider focusing on distributing wealth management products and providing quality product advisory services to high-net-worth individuals in China. In China, third-party wealth management service providers generally refer to those service providers who are not associated with any financial institutions. Our integrated business model features an established wealth management product advisory services operation that is complemented by our growing in-house asset management capabilities. The asset management business, which we started in 2013, not only diversifies our wealth management product offerings and increases our competitiveness, but also enhances our overall profitability.

We provide our wealth management product advisory services mainly to China’s high-net-worth individuals who have investable assets in excess of RMB3.0 million (US$0.5 million). With our network of 5079 client centers in 2943 economically vibrant cities as of December 31, 2015,2016, we strategically bring our services closer to our clients by maintaining a physical presence in key markets in China. Our high-net-worth client base has grown significantly since our inception. During 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, we had 2,122, 4,678, 8,572 and 8,57210,218 active clients, respectively.

Our typical wealth management service team is centered around an experienced wealth management product advisor who maintains regular contact with and facilitate the execution of transactions for our clients. Each wealth management product advisor is supported by an average of fiveseveral client managers, who are tasked with searching for and making contact with potential clients, and a centralized client care unit that specializes in maintaining client relationships. Our wealth management product advisors, many of whom possess industry-recognized qualifications, are primarily recruited from reputable institutions in the wealth management industry and have an average of approximately eight years of industry experience. We believe our wide spectrum of value-added services offered, before, during and after distribution of wealth management products have helped us generate client loyalty. Among our active clients in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, approximately 34.4%41.8%, 41.8%52.1% and 52.1%55.6% of them had previously purchased wealth management products that we distribute at least once before their latest purchase, demonstrating our strong client retention ability despite the fast expansion of our client base.

We serve as a one-stop wealth management product aggregator. In addition to the products that we develop and manage in-house, we also source products from third parties. In 2015,2016, we sourced third-party products from 18eight domestic and fourseven overseas product providers for recommendation to our clients. Our product choices include fixed income products, private equity and venture capital funds, public market products and other products such as insurance products and tailored alternative investments. In 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, the aggregate value of wealth management products we distributed reached RMB7.6 billion, RMB13.3 billion, RMB28.4 billion and RMB28.4RMB45.3 billion, respectively. Our brand is built upon our rigorous risk management and product selection standards, which ensures the quality of products that we distribute. We draw on in-house and external expertise to carefully screen each product we distribute from legal and commercial perspectives.

Our wealth management product advisory services are complemented by our ability to provide asset management services, which we started in 2013, in the management and advisory of real estate or related funds, other specialized fund products and funds of funds. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the amount of total assets under our sole or shared management was RMB12.5RMB36.1 billion, compared to RMB2.4RMB12.5 billion as of December 31, 2014.2015. By participating in the management of a fund where our clients are some of the investors, we are well positioned to develop ongoing relationships with our clients and improve our understanding of their varied expectations for investment products, which in turn helps us and the product providers to design more attractive and competitive products.

We generate our revenues in connection with our wealth management product related services from one-time commissions and recurring service fees paid by third-party product providers, corporate borrowers and corporate borrowers.our own clients. The one-time commissions are calculated based on the value of wealth management products we distribute to our clients. Where we act as the product provider for our self-developed products, we generate revenues from one-time commissions from the corporate borrowers or fees collected from our clients. During the life cycle of some of the public market products and fund products, we charge product providers or corporate borrowers recurring service fees for our ongoing services. Prior to 2015, one-time commissions received from distribution of fixed income products in connection with our wealth management product advisory services accounted for substantially all of our revenues. We also started to generate asset management services revenues in 2013 from one-time commissions for our fund formation services and from recurring management fees for managing the funds. These fees are typically computed as a percentage of the capital contribution in the funds. We expect the recurring management fees to also include performance fees or carried interest paid by funds that we manage or co-manage mostly upon maturity of the relevant funds. In 2016, we cooperated with some peer firms in the asset management industry. We charged those firms consulting service fees for our services, which are negotiated on a case-by-case basis depending on the nature and extent of our services.

We have experienced substantial growth in recent years. Our net revenues increased significantly from US$22.4 million in 2013 to US$38.9RMB237.7 million in 2014 to RMB595.0 million in 2015 and to US$94.4 millionRMB1.1 billion in 2015.2016. The net income attributable to our shareholders increased significantly from US$9.2 million in 2013 to US$14.4RMB87.8 million in 2014 and to US$24.3RMB153.5 million in 2015.2015 and RMB207.6 million in 2016.  Our net revenues in 20152016 from one-time commissions, recurring management fees, and recurring services fees and other service fees were US$54.0RMB633.2 million, US$22.9RMB260.6 million, RMB123.2 million and US$18.7RMB110.7 million, respectively.

Our Services

We provide wealth management product advisory, asset management and other services. These complementary service capabilities enable us to offer customized, value-adding and integrated services to our high-net-worth clients. Our clients’ sizeable amount of investable assets makes us an attractive and reliable source of funds to investment product providers. Our ability to design products further expands our clients’ investment options, and our participation in the ongoing management of investment projects helps forge long-term relationships with both our clients and product providers and corporate borrowers.

Wealth management product advisory services

To help our high-net-worth clients attain their diversified financial objectives, we provide third-party advice on how their investable assets should be allocated. We provide our clients with a wide spectrum of value-added services before, during and after distribution of wealth management products by assisting our clients in crafting their wealth management plans in light of their risk appetite, recommending investment opportunities carefully selected from a vast array of competitive products including fixed income products, private equity and venture capital funds products, public market funds and other products and keeping them informed of the latest market and product intelligence. We require our wealth management service personnel to advise our clients based on their investment needs. For our clients who need advice on product selection, we require our wealth management service personnel to select and suggest products with features and terms that best suit the investor’s risk appetite and investment horizon. When, for instance, a client decides to invest in one-year term fixed income products, we recommend the specific product that we believe is of the highest quality among those products. To help achieve this, we offer our wealth management service personnel with the same internal commission rates for all products with similar feature and term notwithstanding the varying levels of external commission rates we receive from different product providers. Our clients enter into contractual arrangements with the product providers to purchase investment products directly from them. We generally charge product providers or the underlying corporate borrowers a one-time commission based on the investment amount made by our clients. Where we act as the product provider for our self-developed products, we generate revenues from one-time commissions from the product providers or corporate borrowers. We also charge recurring service fees during the life cycle of certain wealth management products from the underlying product providers or corporate borrowers for services we provide, such as investor coordination, investment advisory services and distribution of periodic product performance reports.

We consider the following aspects of our services key to the operation of our wealth management product advisory services:

Our high-net-worth clients

We provide our wealth management product advisory services mainly to China’s high-net-worth individuals who have investable assets in excess of RMB3.0 million. Our client base consists of entrepreneurs, corporate executives, professionals and other investors. During 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, we provided wealth management product advisory services to 2,122, 4,678, 8,572 and 8,57210,218 active clients, respectively. In 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, the aggregate value of wealth management products we distributed reached RMB7.6 billion, RMB13.3 billion, RMB28.4 billion and RMB28.4RMB45.3 billion, respectively. We believe our clients are loyal to our brand and services. Among our active clients in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, approximately 34.4%41.8%, 41.8%52.1% and 52.1%55.6% of them previously purchased wealth management products that we distribute at least once before their latest purchase, demonstrating our strong client retention abilities despite the fast expansion of our client base.

Our client service model

We operate under a proven and cost-efficient client service model, which features a team approach that covers the full service cycle for each client, as illustrated by the diagram below. A typical wealth management service team is centered around an experienced wealth management product advisor who maintains regular contact and facilitates the execution of transactions with our clients, and each wealth management product advisor is supported by an average of fiveseveral client managers and a centralized client care unit. The client managers are tasked with sourcing potential clients and introducing our services to them. The client managers leverage various resources in performing their task, including their social connections and referrals from existing clients. Assisted by these client managers, our wealth management product advisors meet individually with potential clients to assess their risk profile, understand their financial objectives and craft tailored wealth management plans for them. We have a vast array of investment products for our wealth management product advisors and clients to choose from in order to develop tailored portfolios. To sustain and further improve our service quality, we also have a centralized client care unit dedicated to the ongoing maintenance of client relationships and collection of client feedback. Members of the client care unit communicate with our clients on a regular basis to evaluate their level of satisfaction and to explore the need for further services. This integrated client service model facilitates new client development, ensures quality and consistent professional services and promotes long-term relationships with our existing clients.

We place heavy emphasis on recruiting, training and motivating our advisors and other client service team members. Our wealth management product advisors are primarily recruited from private banking teams of both domestic and foreign banks, and other domestic third-party wealth management service providers with an average of approximately eight years of wealth management product advisory industry experience. Our wealth management product advisors are qualified to provide wealth management services, while many of them possess industry-recognized certifications, including CFP, CFA and qualifications to conduct securities, fund and insurance businesses. We require these wealth management product advisors to possess necessary knowledge of financial products and a good understanding of the PRC economy and various market trends. We sponsor regularly scheduled information sessions, seminars, workshops and other training events for various levels of our service teams to keep them informed of the latest market trends, familiarize them with new product types and improve their marketing and advisory skills. From time to time, we organize company-wide conferences where our in-house experts work with third-party consultants to design and offer comprehensive training to our mid-level-and-above management. In addition, by implementing a team structure for our client services, we consciously encourage virtuous competition among the client managers to retain the personnel with the best client development abilities. Compensation of our service team members is largely performance-based. A large part of their compensation is linked to the number of new clients that they bring in and the amount of investment made by our clients following their advice.

Our coverage network

With our network of 5079 client centers in 2943 economically vibrant cities as of December 31, 2015,2016, we bring our services closer to our clients by maintaining a physical presence in key markets in China, primarily covering the Bohai Rim, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. We strategically locate our client centers in cities with high concentrations of high-net-worth individuals, strong growth potential and sufficient supply of industry talents. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we operated seven12 client centers in Shanghai, five client centers in Hangzhou, four client centers in Hangzhou,Suzhou and Qingdao, three client centers in Suzhou,each of Beijing, Xiamen, Chengdu, Tianjin and Nanjing, and Tianjin, two client centers in Beijing, Xiamen, Chengdu,each of Guangzhou, ShenyangShenzhen, Wuxi, Chongqing and ShenzhenNingbo and one client center in 1829 other cities in China.

The map below shows the distribution of our client centers in China as of December 31, 2015:

Asset management services

Our wealth management product advisory services are complemented by our asset management services, which we started in 2013, in the management and advisory of real estate or related funds, other specialized fund products and funds of funds. We substantially strengthened our asset management services with our acquisition of E-House Capital in 2015. We provide fund management services as well as advisory and administrative services, serving as the general partner or co-general partner alongside another management company, to limited partnership funds. Serving as the general partner, co-general partner or manager of the funds under management, we charge a recurring management fee for actively managing the fund’s investments. We share performance fees or carried interest towards the successful completion of the investment projects. Our ability to provide these asset management and advisory services provides us with an additional source of revenue.

By participating in the management of a fund where our clients are some of the investors, we are well positioned to develop ongoing relationships with our clients and improve our understanding of our clients’ expectations for investment products. A significant portion of the products that we help to develop are in the form of private investment funds with real estate as the underlying asset. For those products, the real estate developers benefit from the combination of our industry knowledge and understanding of financial products. Whereas products designed by other providers such as trust companies are typically financed with debt instruments, we are able to design innovative products that feature equity or a combination of debt and equity elements. Products with equity elements are increasingly welcomed by real estate developers because of the higher flexibility in satisfying their financial needs. At the same time, those self-developed real estate investment products offer our clients with an alternative to invest in the sharing of long-term profits instead of fixed returns. For the products that we develop and manage in-house, we invest the product proceeds pursuant to the use of proceeds as provided for under the respective product’s subscription documents.

The table below lists the funds under our management invested in each product category as of December 31, 2015.2016.

(1) The sum of the following percentages do not necessarily equal 100% due to rounding.

Other services

In January 2016, we acquired Jubaopencooperated with some peer firms in the asset management industry. We provide consulting services to them and started our internet finance services, which connect potential borrowers with investors through offline storefronts and an online asset allocation platform. We alsocharge them service fees determined on a case-by-case basis. In addition, we work closely with reputable insurance companies or brokerage firms to distribute insurance products to China’s high-net-worth population, including basic coverage policies and annuities, as well as products that come with investment attributes. With our competitive real estate background, we often work closely with developers to structure new products, offering advice on financial as well as commercial terms and serving an advisory role in financing activities.

Our Product Offerings

Product Categories

We serve as a one-stop wealth management product aggregator and recommend both third-party and self-developed products to our clients. In addition to the products that we develop and manage in-house, we also source products from third parties. In 2015,2016, we sourced products from 18eight domestic and fourseven overseas product providers for recommendation to our clients. Among our product providers, two of them accounted for more than 10% individually and 46.1% in the aggregate of the total value of products we distributed in 2013, two of them accounted for more than 10% individually and 39.6% in the aggregate of the total value of products we distributed in 2014, and one of them accounted for 11.3% of the total value of products we distributed in 2015. In terms of value, the distribution of a majority of products that we distributed were made on an exclusive basis since 2013. Our wealth management product advisors are required to select and recommend products with the goal of maximizing our clients’ interests. We select, evaluate and recommend the following categories of products, whose underlying assets may overlap with each other:

·                  Fixed income products, which refer to projects that are distributed or managed by us with potential prospective fixed rates of return and which mainly include investments in corporate bonds, including real estate-related bonds, or government bonds, either directly or via vehicles such as asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies or securities companies and collateralized fixed income products sponsored by trust companies and fund of funds products where the fund recipients or corporate borrowers are not yet defined at the time of investment. The underlying borrowers of the government or corporate bonds mainly include top-ranking real estate developers and urban investment companies that are affiliated with local governments that have good credit ratings. Prior to 2015, we derived substantially all of our revenues from one-time commissions received from distribution of fixed income products in connection with our wealth management product advisory services.

·                  Private equity and venture capital funds, including direct investments in private equity and venture capital funds sponsored by leading domestic or international asset management companies and indirect investments in such funds via participation in asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies or securities companies.

·                  Public market products, which refer to a type of wealth management products that invest in publicly traded securities in China and which mainly including investments in securities publicly traded on the capital markets via vehicles such as privately raised funds investing in publicly traded stocks and bonds, sponsored by leading asset management companies in China.

·                  Other products, including insurance products and alternative investments. We work with insurance companies and insurance brokerage firms both in China and overseas to introduce products such as whole life coverage and universal life coverage. Our product development team often participates in the product design process to develop customized and innovative financing structures and offer products that are an alternative to traditional investments.

The fixed income products we distributed that have real estate developers as corporate borrowers accounted for 65%73%, 73%68% and 68%73% of the total transaction value of all fixed income products we distributed in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, respectively. Such real estate development-related products are predominantly products relating to residential apartment complexes and commercial properties in urban areas with demonstrated growth potential. To cater to the investment preferences of our clients, many of the real estate development-related products that we select have underlying projects in economically developed areas in China or other populous areas in China with promising economic growth potential. In the period from 20132014 to 2015, 10.0%2016, 9.8%, 9.8%18.2% and 18.2%26.4% of the amount of the real estate development-related products we distributed were to fund projects in Suzhou, Beijing, Xi’an and Shanghai, respectively. Almost all those products are secured by land use rights and/or security interest over the equity interest of the project company, which has legal title to the constructed buildings before they are sold.

To date, fixed income products, particularly real estate or related fund products, account for a significant portion of our wealth management product related revenue streams, although we have witnessed growth in revenue from other product categories over the years. This concentration correlates with the relatively conservative investment appetite and deeply rooted perception among Chinese investors that real estate investments provide more investment transparency and security. In recent years, we started to design unconventional or non-traditional investment products in niche markets, such as fine watch and fine art investment and movie production financing, to cater to the individualized investment needs and tastes of some of our clients. We often customize these products with features and perks such as invitations to movie screenings and guaranteed availability of limited edition items. Such products are especially popular with our clients who have a particular interest in the underlying assets.

The products we distribute may take on a variety of legal structures, including contractual funds, limited partnership funds, the asset management plans or private bond funds administered by a local exchange. “Contractual fund” refers to the rights and obligations regarding investment management among the investor, the manager of the investor’s funds and the custodian of such funds in accordance with the contractual fund contracts, under which the fund manager manages the investor’s fund as its agent.  Instead of being owned by a separate legal entity, the funds to be invested remain the legal property of the investor held in a custody account separate from the fund manager’s own assets or other funds under its management.  The custodian oversees the usage of the fund by the fund manager.  “Asset management plan” refers to an investment arrangement under which a mutual fund management company or its subsidiary (unless otherwise indicated, collectively referred to as mutual fund management company) or securities company, in its capacity as trustee, manages funds entrusted to it by multiple sources for the interest of the entrusting parties by investing the entrusted funds in pre-determined assets or projects to generate returns for the beneficiaries.  Investments in asset management plans are referred to as asset management products.  “Private bond fund” refers to an investment fund that invests in debt instruments which are placed via non-public means to qualified investors and which are regulated by and traded on authorized exchanges in China.

In products we develop and manage in-house or some of the third-party products we help design, we may provide asset management services as a manager of the contractual funds or take on the role of general partner or co-general partner in the limited partnership fund. In products where there is a guarantee provided by the parent of the underlying borrowing entity or a third-party guarantee company, the guarantor would typically provide the guarantee to the contractual funds, limited partnership funds or private bond funds, as the case may be. In terms of fund settlement, the proceeds raised may be released to the borrowing entities through a number of structures, including for example, a unilateral trust arrangement or direct equity investment in an entity set up by the corporate borrower along with a shareholder loan to that entity in accordance with PRC laws and regulations.

Thirty-twoTwenty four of the products that we distributed were subject to redemption by our clients, and the aggregate value of these products that remained subject to possible redemption amounted to RMB3.3RMB4.30 billion as of December 31, 2015.2016. None of these products, if redeemed, will require a refund of the applicable fees we collected.

The table below lists our top 10 products in 20152016 based on the fund raising size of the relevant product:

Product Development and Distribution

We have a team focused on product development, a majority of whom have experience in fund raising and management operations or real estate related work experience. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the team was comprised of 137231 people. We started to develop products in-house in 2013. In terms of value, approximately RMB1.6 billion, RMB6.6 billion, RMB22.7 billion and RMB22.7RMB37.8 billion of the products that we distributed in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, respectively, were either products developed and managed by us or third-party products that we helped design. To date, we have exclusively distributed alla majority of the wealth management products that were developed and managed by us and a majority of the wealth management products that we participated in designing.

For sizable projects with demanding fund-raising timetables, we sometimes use third-party distribution channels in addition to our in-house sales force. These third-party channels consist primarily of third-party wealth management service providers that operate on a smaller scale compared to us. We select them based on market reputation and our prior working experience with them, and we pay channel fees to these third-party distribution channels based on the value of products distributed by them.

Product Selection, Risk Management and Compliance Control

We draw on in-house and external expertise and follow strictly implemented procedures to carefully screen each product we distribute from legal and commercial perspectives. Our quality control starts at the beginning of product selection. In selecting third-party products, leveraging our deep understanding of the markets and extensive experience, we are highly selective and work only with leading trust companies, securities companies, banks, asset management companies and corporate borrowers in their respective fields. Specialists from our product development, finance and legal departments perform rigorous due diligence on of each product candidate. Each product candidate is evaluated from multiple aspects including potential financial performance, the corporate structure and history of the sponsor the qualifications of the investment manager and legal, tax and employment matters. In particular, we stress the importance of product compliance with applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations. A team of our legal staff carefully reviews the registration or approval documents and registration or filing requirement that are applicable to each product to confirm regulatory compliance. Some of our self-developed products, such as contractual funds, are required by PRC law to be filed or registered with government authorities, and our legal staff work diligently to ensure that the filings or registrations are duly completed. When necessary, we engage external professionals to avail ourselves of their expertise in various specialized areas.

Our risk control and viability review committee, which is comprised of our executive officers, other senior managers and heads of legal and financial teams, holds regular sessions to review product selection. In addition to reviewing due diligence findings, this committee also obtains input from our manager sponsoring such products and other in-house experts. Deliberation on a real estate development product, for instance, involves the careful review of the qualifications, experience and reputation of the developer company within the industry, profit prospects of the project, local market conditions and the financing structure and collateralization level of the project. We leverage our strategic affiliation with E-House to acquire the latest market information gathered by their sales agents on-the-ground as well as comprehensive information in CRIC’s real estate market database. We implement strict safe-margin requirements to ensure that a real estate development product can withstand reasonably severe drop in property prices. A prospective product needs to be approved by at least a majority of the committee members before it is launched. Diagram A below illustrates our strictly implemented product screening procedures that a third-party product is subject to before our wealth management product advisors can recommend it to our clients.

For a product that we develop in-house, in addition to the selection procedures applicable to third-party products, we also require that it undergo a viability test conducted by our risk control and viability review committee as shown in the following Diagram B. We actively participate in the initial project study, site visit, financing model development and profit projection of the products that we develop and manage in-house, leveraging our expertise in areas such as real estate development and utilizing leading databases and reports, including CRIC. We analyze the project’s self-generated cash flow, impose third-party guarantee requirements and establish minimum collateralization levels to select only those products that can weather adverse market changes.

Our Value to Product Providers and Corporate Borrowers

As a link between the demand for and supply of investable assets, our services add value not only to high-net-worth individuals but also product providers such as financial institutions and asset management companies, and corporate borrowers.

Financial institutions

We provide financial institutions with access to China’s high-net-worth individuals, to whom they can sell their investment products and from whom they can raise funds. When providing wealth management product advisory services to our clients, we increase their understanding of products offered by those financial institutions and also receive feedback from our clients on their investment expectations, which further helps financial institutions to improve the investment products.

We source products from financial institutions, which mainly include trust companies, securities companies, mutual fund management companies and commercial banks. A large percentage of our fixed income products are sourced from financial institutions.

Asset management companies

In addition to providing the needed funding, in some cases, we serve as a co-general partner of a limited partnership fund and provide administrative support. We achieve economy of scale by providing back-end support to multiple asset managers so that they can focus on investment activities. In some real estate or related funds, we also advise on investment or commercial activities, contributing to the fund’s performance with our expertise.

Corporate borrowers

We advise corporate borrowers on how to tailor their project financing by structuring the project with debt instruments, equity interests or a combination of the two. Such arrangements help improve the financial positions of the borrowers and provide greater leverage. In some cases, we go one step further to help find suitable product providers to design and package those projects into products and introduce such products to our clients, resulting in a series of integrated services. In addition, we from time to time introduce investment or cooperation opportunities to corporate borrowers within their areas of expertise.

Marketing and Brand Promotion

A majority of our clients have come to us through referrals from existing clients and we believe word-of-mouth is an especially effective marketing tool for the wealth management product advisory business, which mainly targets high-net-worth individuals. We intend to engage in nationwide marketing initiatives to further raise our brand awareness while continuing to improve client satisfaction to strengthen our word-of-mouth referrals. We also encourage our employees to introduce or recommend new clients to us by providing incentive bonus.

In addition to word-of-mouth and internal referrals and recommendations, we also enhance our brand recognition and attract potential high-net-worth clients through a variety of offline and online marketing methods:

Offline Marketing Activities.     In order to attract new clients and foster client loyalty, all of our clients are members of our high-end membership club, Paikehui (派客会). The membership is free of charge. Through Paikehui we organize frequent and targeted high-profile events, such as monthly product roadshows in cities across China and one-on-one wealth management salons. These events enable us to present our market outlook and introduce products while affording our members the opportunity to socialize with other Paikehui members. These events are often co-organized by our business partners and well-established industry players, such as top-ranked real estate developers, financial institutions and reputable opinion leaders to provide in-depth and up-to-date market insights and knowledge to our clients. In addition, we also co-host investment and wealth management-related interviews and talk shows with CBN, an influential finance-themed media platform in China, and publish articles and proprietary research reports in major business and finance magazines and newspapers in China. Some of our clients are also members of the J+ Club, a high-end membership club designated for our ultra-high-net-worth clients. We aim to build a financial ecosystem for those ultra-high-net-worth individuals through J+ Club by connecting them with famous economists, business leaders and successful investors. In August 2016, we also organized our first group of members to attend the investment seminar hosted by the Warton Business School in the United States.

Online Marketing Activities.     To further promote our brand, we also take advantage of the Internet and various mobile social network applications, such as Weixin and Weibo, through which we introduce basic products and services information, market research and updates to our members.

Information Technology Infrastructure

We currently use a combination of commercially available and custom-developed software and hardware systems, including a Microsoft OA system that integrates our internal information flow and data management to help us operate efficiently, and our client relationship management, or CRM, system that is supported by the Microsoft OA system to help us collect and analyze our clients’ individualized transaction information to provide tailored services.services, and “Jupai Online,” a mobile application that integrates our online system in assisting our client managers to provide services on the mobile platform for our clients. We are in the process of upgrading our system and IT infrastructure to further enhance our client service and product management capabilities.

Competition

While the wealth management services industry in China is growing rapidly, it is still at an early stage of development and is highly fragmented. We operate in an increasingly competitive environment and compete for clients on the basis of product choice, client service, reputation and brand recognition. Our principal competitors include:

·                  Third-party wealth management service providers.   Our direct competition comes from other third-party wealth management service providers, some of which are relatively well developed, such as Noah Holdings Limited. We believe that we can compete effectively due to the quality of our client-oriented and customized services, our product sourcing and development capabilities and our rigorous risk management systems, in light of the great potential of the wealth management services market.

·                  Commercial banks.   Many commercial banks rely on their own wealth management arms and sales forces to distribute their products. We believe that we compete effectively with commercial banks due to a number of factors, including our independence, which positions us as a centralized wealth management product aggregator to provide and recommend suitable wealth management product advice and product combinations that suit our clients’ financial objectives.

·                  Asset management service providers.   A number of mutual fund management companies, trust companies and securities companies have emerged in the asset management business in China in recent years. We believe that we compete effectively due to the quality of our services, our fund sourcing capabilities from third parties and our in-depth experience in industries such as real estate development.

Intellectual Property

Our brand, trade names, trademarks, trade secrets, proprietary database and research reports and other intellectual property rights distinguish the products we distribute and our services from those of our competitors and contribute to our competitive advantage in the high-net-worth wealth management services industry. We rely on a combination of trademark and trade secret laws as well as confidentiality agreements and non-compete covenants with our wealth management product advisors and other employees, our third-party wealth management product providers and other contractors. We have one registered trademark in China and seven registered domain names, jpinvestment.cn, 51touzi.cn, Jp-fund.com, toushenme18.com, jpjbp.com, eifm.net, and jpjbp.cntoushenme18.com. The registrant of Jp-fund.com is Yumao, and the registrant of jpinvestment.cn, 51touzi.cn and toushenme18.com is the Beijing branch of Shanghai Jupai and the registrant of jpjbp.com, eifm.net, jpjbp.cn is Shanghai Yixun.Jupai. We also have three registered copyrights in China.

Insurance

We participate in government sponsored social security programs including pension, unemployment insurance, childbirth insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance and housing insurance. We do not maintain business interruption insurance or key-man life insurance. We consider our insurance coverage to be in line with that of other wealth management companies of similar size in China.

Regulation

This section sets forth a summary of the most significant rules and regulations that affect our business activities in China.

Regulations on Asset Management Plans

According to the CSRC, qualified mutual fund management companies and securities companies may be entrusted by clients to engage in asset management business.

Asset Management Plans by Mutual Fund Management Companies.

On September 26, 2012, the CSRC promulgated the Pilot Measures for Asset Management Services Provided by Mutual Fund Management Companies for Specific Clients, or the Pilot Measures, which came into effect on November 1, 2012. These Pilot Measures apply to activities whereby a mutual fund management company raises funds from specific clients or acts as the asset manager for specific clients upon their property entrustment, with a custodian institution acting as the asset custodian, and makes investments with the entrusted assets. According to the Pilot Measures, the assets under an asset management plan may be used for the following investments: (i) cash, bank deposits, stocks, bonds, securities investment funds, central bank bills, non-financial enterprises’ debt financing instruments, asset-backed securities, commodity futures and other financial derivatives; (ii) equity interests, creditor’s rights and other property rights not transferred through a stock exchange; and (iii) other assets approved by the CSRC. A specific asset management plan with investment in any assets specified in subparagraphs (ii) or (iii) above is defined as a special asset management plan. In addition, a mutual fund management company shall conduct special asset management plan business only through its subsidiary but not by itself. An asset manager can provide the client-specific asset management plans to a single client or to multiple clients. As for asset management plans for multiple clients, the investment amount of each entrusting client shall be no less than RMB1.0 million, and the number of the clients whose investment is less than RMB3.0 million is limited to 200, while the number of the clients whose investment is more than RMB3.0 million is not limited. In addition, the initial total assets entrusted by the clients under an asset management plan for multiple clients shall be no less than RMB30.0 million and no more than RMB5.0 billion, unless otherwise provided by the CSRC. An asset manager may sell its asset management plans on its own or through an agency qualified to sell mutual funds. Asset management plans are among the third-party products that we introduce to our clients. Our clients purchase the asset management plans directly from the mutual funds management companies based on our advices. As we are solely a service provider to third-party product providers and our revenues are generated from commissions and recurring fees that we charge the mutual funds management companies for our services, we do not own or hold title to the asset management plans. We do not directly sell the asset management plans to our client or process the transactions for our clients. We also do not sign the sales contracts or enter into any written documents with our clients. Therefore, we believe that we are not engaged in the direct sale of the asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies. However, due to the lack of clear and consistent regulatory framework for the sale of asset management plans, we cannot assure you that the relevant PRC government including the CSRC will agree with our interpretation of sales of asset management plans under the relevant rules. If they have different interpretation of the relevant rules and as a result the provisions of consulting services or similar services with respect to sale of asset management plans are deemed as sale of asset management plans and we do not hold the license, the CSRC or other government authorities in China may prohibit fund management companies from engaging companies like us for such services. In such circumstances, we may have to change our business model with respect to asset management plans or cease to provide services relating to asset management plans, and as a result, our business, results of operations and prospects would be adversely affected. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business and Industry — We may fail to obtain and maintain licenses and permits necessary to conduct our operations in China, and our business may be materially and adversely affected as a result of any changes in the laws and regulations governing the financial services in China”.

Asset Management Plans by Securities Companies.

On October 18, 2012, the CSRC promulgated Administrative Measures for Client Asset Management Business of Securities Companies, or the Administrative Measures, and also two detailed rules to implement the Administrative Measures, i.e. the Implementation Rules of Collective Asset Management Plans of Securities Companies, or the Collective Plan Rules, and the Implementation Rules of Designed Asset Management Plans of Securities Companies, which became effective on the same date. On June 26, 2013, the CSRC promulgated the amendment to the Administrative Measures and the Collective Plan Rules, which came into effect on the same date. According to the Administrative Measures and the Collective Plan Rules, securities companies that obtain the required qualification may engage in collective asset management business for multiple clients. Collective asset management plans may invest in (i) stocks, bonds, stock index futures, commodity futures and other products tradable on stock and futures exchanges; (ii) central bank bills, short-term financing bills, mid-term notes and other products tradable on interbank market, (iii) securities investment funds, designed asset management plans of securities companies, wealth management plans of commercial banks, collective fund trust plans and other financial products approved by the competent regulators; and (iv) other investment products approved by CSRC. A collective asset management plan shall meet the following requirements: (i) the total amount of raised funds shall initially be no less than RMB30.0 million and not exceed RMB5.0 billion, (ii) the investment amount of each qualified investor shall not be less than RMB1.0 million, and (iii) the total number of qualified investors shall be no less than 2 and not exceed 200. A qualified investor is defined as an entity or individual that is capable of appropriately identifying risks and bearing the risks of the collective asset management plan, and that satisfies any of the following conditions: (i) the total personal or household financial assets shall be no less than RMB1.0 million, applicable if the qualified investor is a natural person, or (ii) the net assets shall be no less than RMB10.0 million, applicable if the qualified investor is a company, enterprise or institution. A securities company shall put the assets within a collective asset management plan under the custody of an asset custodian with fund custody business qualification. A securities company may either promote collective asset management plans by itself or through other securities companies, commercial banks or other institutions recognized by the CSRC. We distribute asset management plans for securities companies and mutual fund management companies and those companies are required to obtain a license to sell asset management plans. Although we believe such license is not required for our distribution and sourcing of these asset management plans as we do not directly sell asset management plans to and do not enter into the agreements with our clients who invest in these asset management plans, due to the lack of a unified regulatory framework governing the distribution or management of wealth management products thus far, we cannot assure you that the relevant PRC government will agree with our interpretation of the relevant rules governing asset management plans. Also see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — We may fail to obtain and maintain licenses and permits necessary to conduct our operations in China, and our business may be materially and adversely affected as a result of any changes in the laws and regulations governing the financial services industry in China.”

Regulations on Private Equity Investment Products

In China, Renminbi denominated private equity funds are typically formed as limited liability companies or partnerships, and therefore, their establishment and operation is subject to the PRC company laws or partnership laws. The PRC Partnership Enterprise Law was revised in August 2006 when it expanded the scope of eligible partners in partnerships from individuals to legal persons and other organizations and added limited partnerships as a new form of partnership. A limited partnership shall consist of limited partners and at least one general partner. The general partners shall be responsible for the operation of the partnership and assume joint and several liabilities for the debts of the partnership, and the limited partners shall assume liability for the partnership’s debts limited by the amount of their respective capital commitment.

CSRC is now in charge of the supervision and regulation of private funds, including, but not limited to, private equity funds, private securities investment funds, venture capital funds and other forms of private funds. Further, CSRC authorized the Asset Management Association of China, or AMAC, to supervise the registration of private fund managers, record filing of private funds and perform its self-regulatory role. Thus, the AMAC formulated the Measures for the Registration of Private Investment Fund Managers and Filling of Private Investment Funds (for Trial Implementation), or the Measures, which became effective as of February 7, 2014, setting forth the procedures and requirements for the registration of private fund managers and filing of private funds to perform self-regulatory administration of privately placement funds. On August 21, 2014, CSRC promulgated the Interim Provisions for the Supervision and Management of Private Equity Funds, which further clarified the self-regulatory requirements for private funds. Local governments in certain cities, such as Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin, have promulgated local administrative rules to encourage and regulate the development of private equity investment in their areas. These regulations typically provide preferential treatment to private equity funds registered in the cities or districts that satisfy the specified requirements. Such local administrative rules may be changed or preempted according to the new regulations to be issued by CSRC. We have completed the private fund manager registration and filing of private funds under our management with AMAC for the relevant entities that act as private fund managers, including Shanghai Juzhou and four asset management companies that Shanghai Juzhou owns equity interests in.

Regulations on Trust Products

Pursuant to the PRC Trust Law, a trustee can, in its own name, manage and dispose of properties entrusted to it by a trustor for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trust companies are a type of financial institution specializing in the operation of trust business under the PRC Trust Law. Trust companies are subject to the supervision and scrutiny of the China Banking Regulatory Commission, or the CBRC, which is the regulatory authority for banking and financial institutions and related businesses.

On January 23, 2007, the CBRC promulgated the Administrative Rules Regarding Trust Company-Sponsored Collective Fund Trust Plans, or the Trust Plan Rules, which became effective on March 1, 2007 and was subsequently amended on February 4, 2009. Pursuant to the Trust Plan Rules, a trust company may establish collective funds trust plans, or trust plans, under which the trust company, in its capacity as trustee of two or more trustors, may pool funds entrusted to it by such trustors and may manage, invest and dispose of the pooled funds for the benefit of the beneficiaries. A trust plan must comply with the specified requirements under the Trust Plan Rules, which include the requirements that (i) each trustor participating in the trust plan be a qualified investor and the sole beneficiary of his investment in the trust plan; (ii) there be no more than 50 individuals participating in the trust plan, excluding the individual or qualified institutional investor who entrusts more than RMB3.0 million on a single transaction basis; (iii) the trust plan has a term of no less than one year and has a specific use of proceeds and investment strategy that complies with the industrial policies and relevant regulations of China; (iv) the beneficial interest in the trust plan be divided into different trust units of equal amounts; and (v) other than reasonable compensation provided for in the trust agreements, the trust company is prohibited from seeking any profits directly or indirectly from the trust property for itself in any way.

A qualified investor under the Trust Plan Rules is defined as a person, who is capable of identifying, judging and bearing the risks associated with the trust plan and who falls within any one of the following categories: (i) any individual, legal person or other organization who invests at least RMB1.0 million in the trust plan; (ii) any individual who, on a personal or household basis, owns financial assets of at least RMB1.0 million, with proof of such assets, at the time he or she subscribes to the trust plan; or (iii) any individual individually having an annual income of more than RMB0.2 million or, jointly with a spouse, having an annual income of more than RMB0.3 million, with proof of such income, for each of the last three years.

Pursuant to the Trust Plan Rules, when promoting the trust plan, a trust company must use appropriate materials with detailed disclosures and is prohibited from, among other things, (i) promising minimum returns on the entrusted funds; (ii) marketing or promoting the trust plans in public; or (iii) engaging a non-financial institution to promote the trust plan. On April 8, 2014, CBRC issued the Guidance Opinions on Supervision and Management on Risks of the Trust Companies, or Circular 99, and subsequently issued the detailed implementation rules to Circular 99. CBRC strengthened the regulation on promotion of trust plans in Circular 99 and its implementation rules, which explicitly prohibit the trust companies from engaging any non-financial institutions in promoting trust plans directly or indirectly through advisory, consulting, brokerage or other ways. We are not a trust company, but we distributed trust products in the past and such distribution may be deemed as “promotion” of the trust plans under the PRC regulations and rules. We ceased our services to new trust plans after the promulgation of Circular 99. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — If the PRC governmental authorities penalize us for our historical promotion of collective fund trust plans, or trust plans, our business, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected.”

Regulations on Insurance Brokerages

The primary regulation governing the insurance intermediaries is the PRC Insurance Law enacted in 1995 and further amended in 2002 and 2009. According to the PRC Insurance Law, the China Insurance Regulatory Commission, or the CIRC, is the regulatory authority responsible for the supervision and administration of the PRC insurance companies and the intermediaries in the insurance sector, including insurance agencies and brokers.

The principal regulation governing insurance brokerage is the Provisions on the Supervision and Administration of Insurance Brokerage Agency, or the Insurance Brokerage Agency Provisions, promulgated by the CIRC in September 2009, amended and effective as of April 27, 2013. According to the Insurance Brokerage Agency Provisions, an insurance brokerage agency refers to an entity that receives commissions for providing intermediary services to policyholders and sponsors to facilitate their entering into insurance contracts based on the interests of the policyholders. An insurance brokerage agency established in China must meet the qualification requirements specified by the CIRC and obtain a license to operate an insurance brokerage business issued by the CIRC. Among others, the minimum registered capital for an insurance brokerage agency shall be no less than RMB50.0 million and must be fully paid in. The license of an insurance brokerage agency is valid for a period of three years, and can be renewed subject to the approval of the CIRC.

An insurance brokerage agency may conduct the following insurance brokerage businesses:

·                  making insurance proposals, selecting insurance companies and handling the insurance application procedures for insurance applicants;

·                  assisting the insured or the beneficiary in insurance claims;

·                  reinsurance brokering business;

·                  providing consulting services to clients with respect to disaster and damage prevention, risk assessment and risk management; and

·                  other business activities approved by the CIRC.

The senior managers of an insurance brokerage agency must meet certain qualification requirements set forth in the Insurance Brokerage Agency Provisions. Appointment of the senior managers of an insurance brokerage agency is subject to review and approval by the CIRC. Personnel of an insurance brokerage agency who engage in any of the insurance brokerage businesses described above must meet the requirements prescribed by the CIRC and obtain the qualification certificate issued by the CIRC.

As we provide the consulting services to offshore insurance companies and we do not enter into insurance brokerage contract with our clients, we do not think we are engaged in insurance brokerage business in China. However, due to the absence of clear interpretation of the relevant rules, we cannot assure you that the CIRC will agree with our interpretation. If they interpret the relevant rules differently and as a result the consulting services or similar services with respect to offshore insurance products are deemed as insurance brokerage services, we may need to cease the provision of such services. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business and Industry — We may fail to obtain and maintain licenses and permits necessary to conduct our operations in China, and our business may be materially and adversely affected as a result of any changes in the laws and regulations governing the financial services in China”.

Regulations on the Sale of Mutual Funds

On December 28, 2012, the Standing Committee of the PRC National People’s Congress promulgated the Law on Securities Investment Funds, or the New SIF Law, which became effective on June 1, 2013 and replaced the Securities Investment Funds Law effective since June 1, 2004. The New SIF Law not only imposes detailed regulations on mutual funds but also includes new rules on the fund services agencies for the first time. Agencies that engage in sales and other fund services related to mutual funds are required to register or file with the securities regulatory authority. According to New SIF Law, mutual funds are allowed to invest in publicly traded stocks or bonds and other securities or derivatives as permitted by the competent securities regulatory authority from time to time.

Correspondingly, on March 15, 2013, the CSRC amended the Administrative Measures on the Sales of Securities Investment Funds, or the Fund Sales Measures, which became effective on June 1, 2013. The Fund Sales Measures specify that it only applies to the sales of mutual funds. Commercial banks, securities companies, futures companies, insurance companies, securities investment consultation agencies, independent fund sales agencies and other agencies permitted by the CSRC may apply with the local branches of the CSRC for the license related to mutual fund sales. In order to obtain such license, an independent fund sales agency shall meet certain requirements, including without limitation: (i) having a paid-in capital of no less than RMB20.0 million; (ii) the senior executives shall have obtained the fund practice qualification, be familiar with fund sales business, and have two or more years of work experience in fund practice or five or more years of work experience in other relevant financial institutions; (iii) having at least 10 employees qualified to engage in fund related business; and (iv) not being involved in any material changes that have impacted or are likely to impact the normal operation of organizations, or other material issues such as litigations and arbitrations.

Mutual fund managers shall specify the fee charging items, conditions and methods in fund contracts and prospectuses or announcements, and shall specify the rates and calculation methods for the fee charges therein. When dealing with fund sales business, fund sales agencies may collect subscription fee, purchase fee, redemption fee, switching fee, sales service fee, and other relevant fees from the investors according to fund contracts and prospectuses. When providing value-added services to fund investors, fund sales agencies may charge the fund investors value-added service fee. In addition, they shall not charge investors extra fees unless otherwise agreed in fund contracts, prospectuses and fund sales service contracts. Yumao, a subsidiary of Shanghai Jupai, has obtained a license from the CSRC for mutual fund sales on December 15, 2014. Up to date, Yumao has yet to engage in this activity, but it will engage in the sale of mutual fund products and other regulated fund products in the near future.

Regulations on P2P Lending Business

The PRC government has not promulgated any particular rules, laws or regulations to specially regulate the online peer-to-peer, or P2P, lending services industry. However, there are certain rules, laws and regulations relevant or applicable to the online P2P lending services industry, including the PRC Contract Law, the General Principles of the Civil Law of the PRC, and related judicial interpretations promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court.

As a type of contract, the loan agreements in the P2P lending business must meet the requirements of the PRC Contract Law as well as the relevant Supreme People’s Court’s guidance regarding contract formation, validity, performance, enforcement and assignment of contracts. In addition, under the PRC Contract Law and the guidance issued by the Supreme People’s Court in August 2015 on Certain Provisions on Several Issues Concerning Laws Applicable to Trials of Private Lending Cases, (the “Privateor the Private Lending Judicial Interpretation”),Interpretation, a contractual interest rate of above 36% per annum will not be enforceable while the enforceability of interest rates between 24% to 36% depends on the facts of the case.

According to Private Lending Judicial Interpretation, when the lender and borrower formed their lending relationship via an online lending platform, but the online lending platform only provides intermediary service, the People’s Court shall dismiss the lender’s claim if it alleges such platform to assume guarantee responsibilities. The People’s Court, however, shall support the lender’s claim if the provider of the online lending platform makes express indication via webpages, advertisement or other media, or other evidence indicated that it has provided guarantee for the lending, in case that the lender alleges such platform to assume guarantee responsibilities.

A contract for intermediary services under PRC Contract Law is one where the intermediary reports to the client on contract opportunities or supplies intermediary services relating to the entering into of contracts, and the client pays remuneration to the intermediary. The intermediary shall provide the client with a strictly truthful account of all matters relating to the entering into of any contract. Where the intermediary deliberately conceals important matters relating to the entering into of contracts or supplies false information of the facts surrendering the entering into of such contracts, the intermediary is not allowed to claim remuneration and shall also indemnify the client.

Shanghai Yixun provides services in connection with loans between individuals and collects fees from borrowers for the provision of intermediary services, such as information consultation, evaluation and repayment management.

To operate its Jubaopen business, Shanghai Yixun, as a P2P lending service provider, is subject to the relevant rules, policies of or supervision from competent governmental authorities.  A P2P lending business must operate only as a platform that serves as an information intermediary between borrowers and lenders, and must not form any pool of capital, provide any guarantee or illegally raise any funds from the general public.

On July 18, 2015, ten PRC regulatory agencies, including the PBOC, the MIIT and the CBRC, jointly issued the Guidelines on Promoting the Healthy Development of Internet Finance, or the Guidelines. The Guidelines provide that a P2P lending service provider shall function as a platform and provide the investors and the borrowers with information exchange, deal making, credit rating and other intermediary services. A P2P lending service provider shall clarify the nature of information intermediary, provide the direct loans between the investors and borrowers primarily with information services, and must not provide credit enhancement services and engage in illegal fundraising.

The Guidelines require a P2P lending service provider to choose qualified banking financial institutions as the fund deposit institutions for supervision and administration of customer funds to ensure that the customers’ funds and the service provider’s own funds are managed in separate custody accounts.

According to the Guidelines, a P2P lending service provider shall make full information disclosure to the customers, and disclose the information concerning its operating activities and financial standing of the borrower to the investors in a timely manner so that the investors can develop a full understanding of the operating status of the borrower and the P2P lending service provider can operate steadily and control the risks.

Under the Guidelines, a P2P lending service provider shall truly increase the technical security level, keep the customers’ data and transaction information safe and shall not sell or disclose the customers’ personal information in violation of the laws and take effective measures to recognize the identity of customers, monitor and report suspicious transactions proactively, and keep the customers’ data and transaction records safe.

The Guidelines only set out the basic principles for promoting and administering the online P2P lending services industry, and additional detailed rules and regulations will be adopted by the relevant regulatory bodies to implement and enforce those principles. How the requirements in the Guidelines will be interpreted and implemented remains uncertain.

JubaopenOn August 17, 2016, CBRC, MIIT, the Ministry of Public Security and the State Internet Information Office issued Provisional Measures for Administration of Business Activities of Internet Lending Information Intermediaries (“P2P Measures”), pursuant to which Internet lending information intermediaries shall provide information services to lenders and borrowers under the principles of integrity, voluntariness and fairness according to the law, and protect their legitimate rights and interests, and shall not provide value-added services, or directly or indirectly raise funds, absorb public deposits or jeopardize national or social public interests. P2P measures provide that none of internet lending information intermediary may engage in or be entrusted to engage in any of the following activities: (1) financing for its own projects, or doing so in a disguised form; (2) accepting or collecting lenders’ funds, directly or indirectly; (3) offering guarantees to lenders or promise guaranteed returns, directly or disguisedly; (4) promoting, or entrusting or authorizing any third party to promote financing projects at any physical location other than electronic channels like internet, fixed phones and mobile phones; (5) granting loans, unless otherwise provided by laws and regulations; (6) dividing the term of financing projects; (7) selling its own wealth management products and other financial products to raise fund, or sell banks’ wealth management products, brokers’ assets management products, funds, insurance or trust products, or other financial products on behalf of others; (8) providing asset securitization services or transfer creditor’s rights in form of packaged assets, securitized assets, trust assets or fund shares; (9) mixing, bundling or selling as an agent in any form the investment, sales agent and brokerage services of other institutions unless permitted by laws and regulations, and regulatory rules on internet lending; (10) fabricating a financing project, exaggerate the earnings prospects of a financing project, conceal its flaws and risks, falsely advertise or promote a project with ambiguity in language or other deceptive means, make up or spread false information or incomplete information to damage the commercial reputation of others, misleading lenders or borrowers; (11) providing information intermediation services for high-risk financing projects in which loans are used in stock investments, OTC margin financing, futures contracts, structured products and other derivatives; (12) providing equity crowdfunding services; and (13) other activities prohibited by laws and regulations, and regulatory rules on internet lending. Internet lending shall be dominated by small loans. P2P Measures also stipulate that an internet lending information intermediary shall, based on its risk management capability, set upper limits of loan balance of a single borrower borrowed from a single internet lending information intermediary and from all internet lending information intermediaries to avoid credit concentration risk. The loan balance upper limit for a natural person shall be not more than RMB 200,000 borrowed from a single internet lending information intermediary platform and not more than RMB 1 million in total from all platforms. The loan balance upper limit for a legal person or other organizations shall be not more than RMB 1 million borrowed from a single internet lending information intermediary platform and not more than RMB 5 million in total from all platforms.

We may carry out P2P lending business in the future or distribute wealth management product that is intendeda P2P company and thus may be subject to the relevant rules, policies of or supervision from competent governmental authorities.  A P2P lending business must operate only as a platform that serves as an information intermediary between borrowers and lenders, and must not a party to the loans facilitated on the marketplace. Shanghai Yixun has taken measures to comply with the laws and regulations that are applicable to its business operations and to avoid conductingform any activities that may be deemed as illegal fund-raising under the currently applicable laws and regulations. In this respect, Shanghai Yixun has completed its ICP filings for Jubaopen platform, required both the borrower and lender to open the account in Jubaopen platform with real identity information, and adopted its own credit evaluation method by classifying the credit levelpool of borrowers into different levels.

However, due to the lack of detailed regulations and guidance in the area of P2P lending services and the possibility that the PRC governmental authority may promulgate new laws and regulations to regulate P2P lending services in the future, we cannot assure you that our practice would not be deemed to violatecapital, provide any PRC lawsguarantee or regulations, especially relating to illegal fund-raising, credit enhancement services and/or information disclosure.  For example, we cannot rule out the possibility that some of the services Shanghai Yixun provides to investors, such as “Ju Pan”, which is an automated investing tool, might be viewed as not being in full compliance.  This tool automatically allocates committedillegally raise any funds from multiple investors among multiple borrowers, which goes beyond the simple one-to-one matching between investors and borrowers and could therefore be deemed as violating the applicable rules. In addition, under Jubaopen’s risk reserve fund arrangement, the borrower will deposit a sum for the risk reserve fund under our arrangement for repayment to investors of the principal amount in default and accrued interests. It is uncertain whether such risk reserve fund arrangement will be treated as “credit enhancement services”.

Another body of laws and rules applicable to the operation of Jubaopen relates to the prohibition of illegal fund raising. Raising funds by entities or individuals from the general public must be conducted in strict compliance with applicable PRC laws and regulations to avoid administrative and criminal liabilities. The Measures for the Banning of Illegal Financial Institutions and Illegal Financial Business Operations promulgated by the State Council in July 1998, and the Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning the Penalty on Illegal Fund-Raising issued by the General Office of the State Council in July 2007, explicitly prohibit illegal public fund-raising. The Supreme People’s Court promulgated the Judicial Interpretations to Issues Concerning Applications of Laws for Trial of Criminal Cases on Illegal Fund-Raising, or the Illegal Fund-Raising Judicial Interpretations, which came into force in January 2011 to further clarify the criminal charges and potential punishments relating to illegal public fund-raising. An illegal fund-raising activity will be fined or prosecuted in the event that it constitutes a criminal offense. In addition, an individual or an entity who has aided in illegal fund-raising from the general public and charges fees including but not limited to agent fees, rewards, rebates and commission, constitute an accomplice of the crime of illegal fund-raising. In accordance with the Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procurator and the Ministry of Public Security on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Illegal Fund-Raising Criminal Cases, the administrative proceeding for determining the nature of illegal fund-raising activities is not a prerequisite procedure for the initiation of criminal proceeding concerning the crime of illegal fund-raising, and the administrative departments’ failure in determining the nature of illegal fund-raising activities does not affect the investigation, prosecution and trial of cases concerning the crime of illegal fund-raising.  Jubaopen is intended to act as a platform for borrowers and investors and generally not a party to the loans facilitated on its platform. As a result, we believe the operations of Shanghai Yixun are in compliance with the anti-illegal fund-raising regulations.public.

Regulations on Labor Protection

On June 29, 2007, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, or the SCNPC, promulgated the Labor Contract Law, as amended on December 28, 2012, which formalizes employees’ rights concerning employment contracts, overtime hours, layoffs and the role of trade unions and provides for specific standards and procedure for the termination of an employment contract. In addition, the Labor Contract Law requires the payment of a statutory severance pay upon the termination of an employment contract in most cases, including in cases of the expiration of a fixed-term employment contract. In addition, under the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees and its implementation rules, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and on September 18, 2008 respectively, employees are entitled to a paid vacation ranging from 5 to 15 days, depending on their length of service and to enjoy compensation of three times their regular salaries for each such vacation day in case such vacation days are deprived by employers, unless the employees waive such vacation days in writing. Although we are currently in compliance with the relevant legal requirements for terminating employment contracts with employees in our business operation, in the event that we decide to lay off a large number of employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, provisions of the Labor Contract Law may limit our ability to effect these changes in a manner that we believe to be cost-effective or desirable, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Enterprises in China are required by PRC laws and regulations to participate in certain employee benefit plans, including social insurance funds, namely a pension plan, a medical insurance plan, an unemployment insurance plan, a work-related injury insurance plan and a maternity insurance plan, and a housing provident fund, and contribute to the plans or funds in amounts equal to certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of the employees as specified by the local government from time to time at locations where they operate their businesses or where they are located. According to the Social Insurance Law, an employer that fails to make social insurance contributions may be ordered to pay the required contributions within a stipulated deadline and be subject to a late fee of 0.05% of the amount overdue per day from the original due date by the relevant authority. If the employer still fails to rectify the failure to make social insurance contributions within such stipulated deadline, it may be subject to a fine ranging from one to three times the amount overdue. According to Regulations on Management of Housing Fund, an enterprise that fails to make housing fund contributions may be ordered to rectify the noncompliance and pay the required contributions within a stipulated deadline; otherwise, an application may be made to a local court for compulsory enforcement.

Regulations on Foreign Investment

The State Planning Commission, the State Economic and Trade Commission and the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation jointly promulgated the Foreign Investment Industrial Guidance Catalogue, or the Foreign Investment Catalogue, in 2005, which was subsequently revised. The Foreign Investment Catalogue sets forth the industries in which foreign investment are encouraged, restricted, or forbidden. Industries that are not indicated as any of the above categories under the Foreign Investment Catalogue are permitted areas for foreign investment. The current version of the Foreign Investment Catalogue came into effect on April 10, 2015. Pursuant to the currently effective or the amended Foreign Investment Catalogue, market survey, a business activity that we currently engage in through our VIE, is restricted for foreign investment. As market survey may be constantly involved during our development and expansion, we may continue this business activity through contractual arrangements with our consolidated subsidiary, Shanghai Jupai.

In addition, if our PRC subsidiary and consolidated entities plan to engage in promoting or distributing wealth management plans through the Internet, or allows our clients to purchase wealth management products on any of our websites, such business is likely to be deemed as value-added telecommunications service and call for approvals from relevant authorities. Foreign investment in telecommunications businesses is governed by the State Council’s Administrative Rules for Foreign Investments in Telecommunications Enterprises, issued by the State Council on December 11, 2001 and amended on September 10, 2008, under which a foreign investor’s beneficial equity ownership in an entity providing value-added telecommunications services in China cannot exceed 50%. In addition, for a foreign investor to acquire any equity interest in a business providing value-added telecommunications services in China, it must demonstrate a positive track record and experience in providing such services. The MIIT’s Notice Regarding Strengthening Administration of Foreign Investment in Operating Value-Added Telecommunication Businesses, or the MIIT Notice, issued on July 13, 2006 prohibits holders of these services licenses from leasing, transferring or selling their licenses in any form, or providing any resource, sites or facilities, to any foreign investors intending to conduct such businesses in China. Although MIIT promulgated its Notice on Lifting Foreign Investment Restrictions on Online Data and Deal Processing Business on June 19, 2015, which permits foreign ownership, in whole or in part, of online data and deal processing business, a sub-type of value-added telecommunications service, we still expect our potential business of online promotion and distribution of wealth management products to face foreign investment restrictions or uncertainties, since it is not clear whether our potential business will be deemed as online data and deal processing.

We plan to engage in the direct sales of mutual funds and asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies. While the distribution of mutual funds and asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies is not explicitly categorized as restricted to foreign investment, a license is required for the direct sales of mutual fund and asset management plans sponsored by mutual fund management companies. In practice, such license is generally unavailable to foreign invested enterprises or their subsidiaries. In order to conduct our direct sales services in the future, we have entered into contractual arrangements through Shanghai Juxiang, our PRC subsidiary, with Shanghai Jupai, our PRC variable interest entity. In December 2014, Yumao obtained the mutual fund sales license, and accordingly, we plan to start the sale of mutual fund products and other regulated fund products through Yumao in the near future. Similarly, although asset management services are not prohibited or restricted from foreign investments, PRC authorities are more accustomed to dealing with domestic PRC fund managers without foreign investment. As a result, we conduct our asset management services through our VIE to ensure smooth operations.

Our PRC subsidiary is also not allowed to engage in insurance brokerage businesses. Therefore, our insurance brokerage related business is carried out principally through Jupai HK.HK and our consolidated entities. In 2016, we acquired 85% equity ownership of Non-Linear Investment Management Limited, a Hong Kong entity holding the future,required license to provide the insurance brokerage services in Hong Kong, and 100% equity interest in Jiangsu Kangan Insurance Brokers Co. Ltd, a PRC entity holding the required license to provide the insurance brokerage services in China, and we plan to engage in the insurance brokerage businesses in the PRC and we will relyrelying on ourlicenses held by these consolidated entities to obtain and hold the required license for such business.entities.

E-House Capital relies on similar contractual arrangements with Scepter Pacific’s variable interest entities in China to conduct its asset management services. Although foreign-invested enterprises incorporated in China are not expressly prohibited from providing asset management services in China, in practice, when acting as the general partner of various funds, Scepter Pacific may also need to invest in projects or funds as a limited partner at the same time. Some targeted projects, such as high-end hotel and office building rental projects, are in prohibited or restricted categories for foreign investment. Therefore, E-House Capital to provide asset management services through contractual arrangements between Scepter Pacific’s wholly-owned PRC subsidiary and its variable interest entities in China.

Other than those disclosed above, we are not aware of any other PRC legal restriction or prohibition for foreign investment in the business activities that we and E-House Capital engage in.

In the opinion of AllBright Law Offices, our PRC legal counsel:

·                  the ownership structures of Shanghai Jupai, Shanghai Juxiang, and Jupai, as described in “A. History and Development of the Company” both currently and after giving effect to this offering,Company,” are in compliance with all existing PRC laws and regulations,

·                  the contractual arrangements governed by PRC laws among Shanghai Juxiang, Shanghai Jupai and its shareholders establishing the corporate structure for our wealth management and asset management businesses are valid, binding and enforceable, and will not result in a violation of PRC laws or regulations currently in effect; and

·                  the contractual arrangements governed by PRC laws among Shanghai Baoyi, Shanghai E-Cheng and its shareholders establishing the corporate structure for E-House Capital’s asset management service business are valid, binding and enforceable, and will not result in a violation of PRC laws or regulations currently in effect.

We have been advised by our PRC legal counsel, however, that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations and rules, including the laws and regulations governing the enforcement and performance of our contractual arrangement in the event of any imposition of statutory liens, bankruptcy and criminal proceedings. Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may in the future take a view that is contrary to the above opinion of our PRC counsel. We have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that if the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our business do not comply with PRC governmental restrictions on foreign investment in our businesses, we could be subject to severe penalties, including being prohibited from continuing operations. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.”

Regulations on Tax

PRC Enterprise Income Tax

The PRC enterprise income tax is calculated based on the taxable income determined under the PRC laws and accounting standards. On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of China enacted a new PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008. On December 6, 2007, the State Council promulgated the Implementation Rules to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the Implementation Rules, which also became effective on January 1, 2008. On December 26, 2007, the State Council issued the Notice on Implementation of Enterprise Income Tax Transition Preferential Policy under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the Transition Preferential Policy Circular, which became effective simultaneously with the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law. The PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law imposes a uniform enterprise income tax rate of 25% on all domestic enterprises, including foreign-invested enterprises unless they qualify for certain exceptions, and terminates most of the tax exemptions, reductions and preferential treatments available under previous tax laws and regulations.

Moreover, under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, enterprises organized under the laws of jurisdictions outside China with their “de facto management bodies” located within China may be considered PRC resident enterprises and therefore subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide income. The Implementation Rules define the term “de facto management body” as the management body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In addition, the Circular Related to Relevant Issues on the Identification of a Chinese holding Company Incorporated Overseas as a Residential Enterprise under the Criterion of De Facto Management Bodies Recognizing issued by the State Administration of Taxation on April 22, 2009 provides that a foreign enterprise controlled by a PRC company or a PRC company group will be classified as a “resident enterprise” with its “de facto management bodies” located within China if the following requirements are satisfied: (i) the senior management and core management departments in charge of its daily operations function mainly in China; (ii) its financial and human resources decisions are subject to determination or approval by persons or bodies in China; (iii) its major assets, accounting books, company seals and minutes and files of its board and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in China; and (iv) more than half of the enterprise’s directors or senior management with voting rights reside in China. Although the circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises and not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the determining criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the State Administration of Taxation’s general position on how the “de facto management body” test should be applied in determining the tax resident status of offshore enterprises, regardless of whether they are controlled by PRC enterprises, individuals or foreigners.

We do not believe Jupai or any of its subsidiaries outside of China was a PRC resident enterprise for the year ended December 31, 2013, but we cannot predict whether such entities may be considered as a PRC resident enterprise for any subsequent taxable year. Although our company is not controlled by any PRC company or company group, substantial uncertainty exists as to whether we will be deemed as a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. In the event that we were considered a PRC resident enterprise, we would be subject to the PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on our worldwide income, but the dividends that we receive from our PRC subsidiary would be exempt from the PRC withholding tax since such income is exempted under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law for a PRC resident enterprise recipient. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — The dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiary may be subject to PRC tax under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.”

PRC VAT and Business Tax

Pursuant to the Interim Regulation of the People’s Republic of China on Value-Added Tax, (the “VAT Regulation”),or the VAT Regulation, which was amended on November 10, 2008, any entity or individual engaged in the sales of goods, provision of specified services and importation of goods into China is generally required to pay a VAT, at the rate of 17% of the gross sales proceeds received, less any deductible VAT already paid or borne by such entity.

Pursuant to the PRC Provisional Regulations on Business Tax, taxpayers falling under the category of service industry in China are required to pay a business tax at a normal tax rate of 5% of their revenues. In November 2011, the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Pilot Plan for Imposition of Value-Added Tax to Replace Business Tax. Pursuant to this plan and relevant notices, from January 1, 2012, the value-added tax has been imposed to replace the business tax in the transport and shipping industry and some of the modern service industries in certain pilot regions, of which Shanghai is the first one. A value-added tax, or VAT, rate of 6% applies to revenue derived from the provision of some modern services.

On December 12, 2013, the Ministry of Finance and State Administration of Taxation issued Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on Including the Railway Transportation and Postal Industries in the Pilot Program of Replacing Business Tax with Value-Added Tax (2013 Amendment), along with Pilot Implemental Rules of Replacing Business Tax with VAT, which is effective on January 1, 2014 (“Pilot Rules”). Pursuant to Pilot Rule, the unit and individual who provide service in transportation, postal and other modern service industrial shall be tax payer of VAT. Taxpayer who provide taxable service shall pay VAT, instead of Business Tax. The tax rate for provision of modern service industrial (exclusive of leasing of tangible chattel) is 6%.

On December 16, 2013, the State Administration of Taxation issued the Announcement on Matters concerning the Determination of the Qualification of General VAT Taxpayers under the Pilot Program of Replacing Business Tax with VAT, (the “VAT Announcement”),or the VAT Announcement, which became effective on January 1, 2014. According to the VAT Announcement, a pilot taxpayer who has been determined as a general VAT taxpayer before the implementation of the pilot program and concurrently provides taxable services is not required to apply for the qualification again. The competent tax authority shall prepare and deliver the Notice of Tax-Related Matters and inform the taxpayer. A pilot taxpayer with annual sales amount of taxable services above RMB5.0 million before the implementation of the pilot program of VAT in lieu of business tax shall go through the formalities for the qualification of a general VAT taxpayer with the competent tax authority under the State Administration of Taxation.

On March 23, 2016, Ministry of Finance and State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on Implementing the Pilot Program of Replacing Business Tax with Value-Added Tax in an All-round Manner, which became effective on May 1, 2016. According to such Notice, the pilot scheme on levying value-added tax in place of business tax shall be launched nation-wide, all business tax taxpayers in the construction industry, real estate industry, financial industry, living services etc shall be included in the scope of the pilot scheme, and subject to value-added tax instead of business tax.

Dividend Withholding Tax

Pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and the Implementation Rules, dividends generated after January 1, 2008 and payable by a foreign-invested enterprise in China to its foreign investors are subject to a 10% withholding tax, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. We are a Cayman Islands holding company and substantially all of our income may come from dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiary directly or indirectly. Since there is no such tax treaty between China and the Cayman Islands, dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiary will generally be subject to a 10% withholding tax. We have evaluated whether Jupai is a PRC resident enterprise and we believe that Jupai was not a PRC resident enterprise for the year ended December 31, 2014. However, as there remains uncertainty regarding the interpretation and implementation of the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and the Implementation Rules, it is uncertain whether, if Jupai will be deemed a PRC resident enterprise in the future, any dividends distributed by Jupai to our non-PRC shareholders and ADS holders would be subject to any PRC withholding tax. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — The dividends we receive from our PRC subsidiary may be subject to PRC tax under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and to our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.”

Pursuant to the Arrangement between the Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income, or the Tax Arrangement, where a Hong Kong resident enterprise which is considered a non-PRC tax resident enterprise directly holds at least 25% of a PRC enterprise, the withholding tax rate in respect of the payment of dividends by such PRC enterprise to such Hong Kong resident enterprise is reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%, subject to approval of the PRC local tax authority. Pursuant to the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on the Issues concerning the Application of the Dividend Clauses of Tax Agreements, or Circular 81, a resident enterprise of the counter-party to such Tax Arrangement should meet the following conditions, among others, in order to enjoy the reduced withholding tax under the Tax Arrangement: (i) it must directly own the required percentage of equity interests and voting rights in such PRC resident enterprise; and (ii) it should directly own such percentage in the PRC resident enterprise anytime in the 12 months prior to receiving the dividends. Furthermore, the Administrative Measures for Non-Resident Enterprises to Enjoy Treatments under Tax Treaties (For Trial Implementation), or the Administrative Measures, which became effective in October 2009, requires that the non-resident enterprises must obtain the approval from the relevant tax authority in order to enjoy the reduced withholding tax rate under the tax treaties. There are also other conditions for enjoying such reduced withholding tax rate according to other relevant tax rules and regulations. Accordingly, Jupai HK may be able to enjoy the 5% withholding tax rate for the dividends it receives from Shanghai Juxiang, if it satisfies the conditions prescribed under Circular 81 and other relevant tax rules and regulations, and obtains the approvals as required under the Administrative Measures. However, according to Notice 81, if the relevant tax authorities consider the transactions or arrangements we have are for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax in the future.

United States Foreign Account Tax Compliance ActHong Kong Income tax

The United States has passedUnder the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA, that imposes a new reporting regime and, potentially, a 30% withholdingcurrent Hong Kong Inland Revenue Ordinance, our Hong Kong subsidiary is subject to 16.5% income tax on certain payments made to certain non-U.S. entities. In general,their taxable income generated from operations in Hong Kong. Under the 30% withholdingHong Kong tax applies to certain payments made to a non-U.S. financial institution unless such institution is treated as deemed compliant or enters into an agreement withlaws, we are exempted from the US Treasury to report, on an annual basis, information with respect to certain interests in, and accounts maintained by, the institution to the extent such interests or accounts are held by certain U.S. persons and by certain non-U.S. entities that are wholly or partially owned by certain U.S. persons and to withhold on certain payments. The 30% withholdingHong Kong income tax also generally applies to certain payments made to a non-financial non-U.S. entity that does not qualify under certain exemptions unless such entity either (i) certifies that such entity does not have any “substantial United States owners” or (ii) provides certain information regarding the entity’s “substantial United States owners.” An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and another country may also modify these requirements. We do not expect FATCA will have a material impact on our business or operations, but because FATCA is particularly complex and its application is uncertain at this time, we cannot assure you that we willforeign-derived income. In addition, payments of dividends from our Hong Kong subsidiary to us are not be adversely affected by this legislation in the future.subject to any Hong Kong withholding tax.

Regulations on Foreign Exchange

Foreign exchange regulations in China are primarily governed by the following rules:

·                  Foreign Exchange Administration Rules (1996), as amended, or the Exchange Rules; and

·                  Administration Rules of the Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange (1996), or the Administration Rules.

Under the Exchange Rules, Renminbi is convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest and royalty payments, trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of Renminbi for capital account items, such as direct investment, loan, securities investment and repatriation of investment, however, is still subject to the approval of SAFE.

Under the Administration Rules, foreign-invested enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents and, in the case of capital account item transactions, obtaining approval from SAFE. Capital investments by foreign-invested enterprises outside of China are also subject to limitations, including approval by the Ministry of Commerce, SAFE and the National Development and Reform Commission or their local counterparts.

On November 16, 2011, SAFE promulgated the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues Relating to Further Clarification and Regulation of Certain Capital Account Items under Foreign Exchange Control, or SAFE Circular 45, to further strengthen and clarify its existing regulations on foreign exchange control under SAFE Circular 142. Circular 45 expressly prohibits foreign invested entities, including wholly foreign owned enterprises such as Shanghai Juxiang, from converting registered capital in foreign exchange into Renminbi for the purpose of equity investment, granting certain loans, repayment of inter-company loans, and repayment of bank loans which have been transferred to a third party. Further, SAFE Circular 45 generally prohibits a foreign invested entity from converting registered capital in foreign exchange into Renminbi for the payment of various types of cash deposits. If our VIE requires financial support from us or our wholly owned subsidiary in the future and we find it necessary to use foreign currency-denominated capital to provide such financial support, our ability to fund our VIE’s operations will be subject to statutory limits and restrictions, including those described above.

On May 10, 2013, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Printing and Distributing the Provisions on Foreign Exchange Administration over Domestic Direct Investment by Foreign Investors and the Supporting Documents, which specifies that the administration by SAFE or its local branches over foreign direct investment in the PRC shall be conducted by way of registration. Institutions and individuals shall register with SAFE and/or its branches for their direct investment in China. Banks shall process foreign exchange business relating to the direct investment in China based on the registration information provided by SAFE and its branches.

In February 2015, SAFE promulgated the Circular of Further Simplifying and Improving the Policies of Foreign Exchange Administration Applicable to Direct Investment, or Circular 13, which will become effective on June 1, 2015. Upon the implementation of Circular 13, the current foreign exchange procedures will be further simplified, foreign exchange registrations of direct investment will be handled by designated foreign exchange settlement banks instead of SAFE and its branches.

On March 30, 2015, SAFE issued the Circular on Reform of the Administrative Rules of the Payment and Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-Invested Enterprises (“SAFE Circular 19”), which became effective on June 1, 2015. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 19, foreign-invested enterprises may either continue to follow the current payment-based foreign currency settlement system or elect to follow the “conversion-at-will” regime of foreign currency settlement. Where a foreign-invested enterprise follows the conversion-at-will regime of foreign currency settlement, it may convert part or all of the amount of the foreign currency in its capital account into Renminbi at any time. The converted Renminbi will be kept in a designated account labeled as settled but pending payment, and if the foreign-invested enterprise needs to make payment from such designated account, it still needs to go through the review process with its bank and provide necessary supporting documents. SAFE Circular 19, therefore, has substantially lifted the restrictions on the usage by a foreign-invested enterprise of its RMB registered capital converted from foreign currencies. According to SAFE Circular 19, such Renminbi capital may be used at the discretion of the foreign-invested enterprise and SAFE will eliminate the prior approval requirement and only examine the authenticity of the declared usage afterwards. Nevertheless, foreign-invested enterprises like our PRC subsidiary are still not allowed to extend intercompany loans to our PRC consolidated entities. In addition, as Circular 19 was promulgated recently, there remain substantial uncertainties with respect to the interpretation and implementation of this circular by relevant authorities.

On June 9, 2016, SAFE issued the Circular on Reforming and Regulating Policies on the Control over Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital Accounts (“Circular 16”), which became effective simultaneously. Pursuant to Circular 16, enterprises registered in the PRC may also convert their foreign debts from foreign currency to RMB on self-discretionary basis. Circular 16 provides an integrated standard for conversion of foreign exchange under capital account items (including but not limited to foreign currency capital and foreign debts) on self-discretionary basis which applies to all enterprises registered in the PRC. Circular 16 reiterates the principle that RMB converted from foreign currency-denominated capital of a company may not be directly or indirectly used for purpose beyond its business scope or prohibited by PRC Laws or regulations, while such converted RMB shall not be provide as loans to its non-affiliated entities. As Circular 16 is newly issued and SAFE has not provided detailed guidelines with respect to its interpretation or implementation, it is uncertain how these rules will be interpreted and implemented.

Regulations on Dividend Distribution

The principal regulations governing dividend distributions of wholly foreign-owned companies include:

·                  Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise Law, as amended on October 31, 2000; and

·                  Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise Law Implementing Rules, as amended on April 12, 2001.

·                  Company Law of China, as amended on December 28, 2013.

Under these laws and regulations, wholly foreign-owned companies in China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, these wholly foreign-owned companies are required to set aside at least 10% of their respective accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds, until the accumulative amount of such fund reaches 50% of its registered capital. Although the statutory reserves can be used, among other ways, to increase the registered capital and eliminate future losses in excess of retained earnings of the respective companies, the reserve funds are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of liquidation. At the discretion of these wholly foreign-owned companies, they may allocate a portion of their after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. These reserve funds and staff welfare and bonus funds are not distributable as cash dividends.

Regulations on Offshore Investment by PRC Residents

Pursuant to the SAFE’s Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for PRC Residents to Engage in Financing and Round Trip Investment via Overseas Special Purpose Companies and its subsequent amendments, supplements or implementation rules, or SAFE Circular 75, issued on October 21, 2005, a PRC resident (whether a natural person or legal persons) shall register with the local branch of the SAFE before it establishes or controls an overseas SPV, with assets or equity interests in a PRC company, for the purpose of overseas equity financing. On July 4, 2014, SAFE issued the SAFE’s Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for PRC Residents to Engage in Outbound Investment and Financing and Inbound Investment via Special Purpose Vehicles (“SPV”), or SAFE Circular 37, which has superseded SAFE Circular 75. According to SAFE Circular 37, the PRC domestic resident shall apply for SAFE registration for overseas investment before paying capital to SPV by using his, her or its legal assets whether overseas or domestic. The SPV is defined as “offshore enterprise directly established or indirectly controlled by the domestic residents (including domestic institutions and individuals) with their legally owned assets and equity of the domestic enterprise, or legally owned offshore assets or equity, for the purpose of offshore investment and financing”. In addition, in the event that the SPV undergoes changes of its basic information such as the individual shareholder, name, operation term, etc., or material events including increase or decrease by domestic individual shareholder in investment amount, equity transfer or swap, merge, spin-off, etc., the domestic resident shall timely complete the change of foreign exchange registration formality for offshore investment.

According to SAFE Circular 37, failure to make such registration or truthfully disclose actual controllers of the round-trip enterprises may subject PRC residents to fines up to RMB300,000 in case of domestic institutions or RMB50,000 in case of domestic individuals. If the registered or beneficial shareholders of the offshore holding company who are PRC residents do not complete their registration with the local SAFE branches, the PRC subsidiary may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to the offshore company, and the offshore company may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital to its PRC subsidiary. Moreover, failure to comply with SAFE registration and amendment requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for violating applicable foreign exchange restrictions. Mr. Tianxiang Hu, Dr. Weishi Yao, Ms. Yacheng Shen, Mr. Keliang Li and Ms. Yichi Zhang have all fulfilled the registration under relevant SAFE regulations.

Regulations on Stock Incentive Plans

On December 25, 2006, the People’s Bank of China promulgated the Administrative Measures of Foreign Exchange Matters for Individuals, setting forth the respective requirements for foreign exchange transactions by individuals (both PRC or non-PRC citizens) under either the current account or the capital account.

On February 15, 2012, SAFE issued the Notices on Issues concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company, or the Stock Incentive Plan Rules. The purpose of the Stock Incentive Plan Rules is to regulate foreign exchange administration of PRC domestic individuals who participate in employee stock holding plans and stock option plans of overseas listed companies. According to the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, if PRC “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding the foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas listed company, a PRC domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC subsidiary of such overseas listed company, shall, among others things, file, on behalf of such individual, an application with SAFE to conduct the SAFE registration with respect to such stock incentive plan, and obtain approval for an annual allowance with respect to the purchase of foreign exchange in connection with stock holding or stock option exercises. In addition, SAFE Circular 37 also provides certain requirements and procedures of foreign exchange registration in relation to equity incentive plan of SPV before listing. In this regard, if a non-listed SPV grants equity incentives to its directors, supervisors, senior officers and employees in its domestic subsidiaries, the relevant domestic individual residents may register with SAFE before exercising their rights.

The Stock Incentive Plan Rules and SAFE Circular 37 were promulgated only recently and many issues require further interpretation. If we or our PRC employees fail to comply with the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, we and our PRC employees may be subject to fines and other legal sanctions. In addition, the General Administration of Taxation has issued a few circulars concerning employee stock options. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Our PRC subsidiary has obligations to file documents related to employee stock options with relevant tax authorities and withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their stock options. If our employees fail to pay and we fail to withhold their income taxes, we may face sanctions imposed by tax authorities or other PRC government authorities.

Regulation Relating to Privacy Protection

Internet content providers, or ICPs, are prohibited from producing, copying, publishing or distributing information that is humiliating or defamatory to others or that infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of others. Depending on the nature of the violation, ICPs may face criminal charges or sanctions by PRC security authorities for such acts, and may be ordered to suspend temporarily their services or have their licenses revoked.

Under the Several Provisions on Regulating the Market Order of Internet Information Services, issued by the MIIT on December 29, 2011, ICPs are also prohibited from collecting any user personal information or providing any such information to third parties without the consent of a user. ICPs must expressly inform the users of the method, content and purpose of the collection and processing of such user personal information and may only collect such information necessary for its services. ICPs are also required to properly maintain the user personal information, and in case of any leak or likely leak of the user personal information, ICPs must take remedial measures immediately and report any material leak to the telecommunications regulatory authority.

In addition, the Decision on Strengthening Network Information Protection promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on December 28, 2012 emphasizes the need to protect electronic information that contains individual identification information and other private data. The decision requires ICPs to establish and publish policies regarding the collection and use of personal electronic information and to take necessary measures to ensure the security of the information and to prevent leakage, damage or loss. Furthermore, MIIT’s Rules on Protection of Personal Information of Telecommunications and Internet Users promulgated on July 16, 2013 contain detailed requirements on the use and collection of personal information as well as the security measures to be taken by ICPs.

The PRC government retains the power and authority to order ICPs to provide an Internet user’s personal information if such user posts any prohibited content or engages in any illegal activities through the Internet.

In addition, General Rule of Civil Law promulgated on March 15, 2017, to be effective on October 1, 2017, expressly provides that natural persons enjoy the right of privacy.

We will be subject to the ICP regulation and other privacy regulation if and when we begin to sell mutual fund products online.

C.Organizational Structure

The following chart illustrates our company’s organizational structure as of March 31, 2016:February 28, 2017:

Notes:

(1)         Shanghai Jupai is one of our VIEs. Each of Mr. Tianxiang Hu, Dr. Weishi Yao, Mr. Keliang Li, Ms. Yacheng Shen and Ms. Yichi Zhang, holds 67.7%, 10%, 8.3%, 8% and 6% of equity interests in Shanghai Jupai, respectively.

Among those shareholders, Dr. Yao ceased his employment with us as of February 27, 2017.

(2)         Mr. Jianda Ni, Mr. Tianxiang Hu, Dr. Weishi Yao, Ms. Min Liu and Mr. Liang Li owns 2%, 3%, 3%, 2% and 2% of Shanghai Yixun Internet Finance Information Services Co., Ltd., respectively. Mr. Hui Wang, who is the general manager and chief operating officer of this company also owns 10% of its equity interest.

(3)         The remaining 15% of the equity interest is owned by a third party unrelated to us.

(4)(3)         The remaining 15% of the equity interest is owned by Mr. Liang Li, our president,chief operating officer and 5% of the equity interest is owned by an employee.

(5)(4)         The remaining 10% of the equity interest is owned by Mr. Liang Li, our president.chief operating officer.

(5)         The remaining 49% of the equity interest is owned by a third party unrelated to us.

(6)         The remaining 15% of the equity interest is owned by Mr. Liang Li, our chief operating officer.

(7)         The remaining 20% of the equity interest is owned by a third party unrelated to us.

(8)         Shanghai Juzhou owns equity interests in 1715 asset management companies. Among the 1715 companies, Shanghai Yiju Asset Management Co., Ltd, or Shanghai Yiju, is owned by Shanghai Juzhou and Yidezhao.

(7)(9)         Shanghai E-Cheng is one of our VIEs. Each of Mr. Zuyu Ding and Mr. Weijie Ma holds 50% equity interest in Shanghai E-Cheng. Messrs. Ding and Ma are both employees of E-House.

(8)         It is a limited partnership. Shanghai E-Cheng is the limited partner and Shanghai Yubo, as the general partner, holds the remaining interests in the partnership.

Contractual Arrangement with Shanghai Jupai

In January 2014, we amended and restated the contractual arrangements that we previously entered into with Shanghai Jupai in September 2013. The following is a summary of the currently effective contractual arrangements by and among our wholly-owned subsidiary, Shanghai Juxiang, our VIE, Shanghai Jupai, and the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai.

Operating Agreement.     Pursuant to the amended and restated operating agreement among Shanghai Juxiang, Shanghai Jupai and the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai dated January 8, 2014, Shanghai Jupai and the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai agreed not to enter into any transaction that could materially affect Shanghai Jupai’s assets, obligations, rights or operations without prior written consent from Shanghai Juxiang, including but not limited to the amendment of the articles of association of Shanghai Jupai. Shanghai Jupai and its shareholders agree to accept and follow our corporate policies provided by Shanghai Juxiang in connection with Shanghai Jupai’s daily operations, financial management and the employment and dismissal of Shanghai Jupai’s employees. Shanghai Jupai agreed that it should seek guarantee from Shanghai Juxiang first if any guarantee is needed for Shanghai Jupai’s performance of any contract or loan in the course of its business operation. The agreement shall be in effective as long as Shanghai Jupai exists. None of Shanghai Jupai and its shareholders can terminate this agreement. Shanghai Juxiang may terminate the agreement by giving a 30-day prior written notice.

Call Option Agreement.     Under the amended and restated call option agreement among Shanghai Juxiang, Shanghai Jupai and the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai dated January 8, 2014, each of the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai irrevocably granted to Shanghai Juxiang or its designee an option to purchase at any time, to the extent permitted under PRC law, all or a portion of his equity interests in Shanghai Jupai. Also, Shanghai Juxiang or its designee has the right to acquire any and all of its assets of Shanghai Jupai. Without Shanghai Juxiang’s prior written consent, Shanghai Jupai’s shareholders cannot transfer their equity interests in Shanghai Jupai, and Shanghai Jupai cannot transfer its assets. The acquisition price for the shares or assets will be the minimum amount of consideration permitted under the PRC law at the time of the exercise of the option. Shanghai Juxiang may terminate the agreement early, whereas none of Shanghai Jupai and its shareholders can terminate this agreement.

Equity Interest Pledge Agreement.     Under the amended and restated equity pledge agreement among Shanghai Juxiang, Shanghai Jupai and the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai dated October 9, 2014, the shareholders pledged all of their equity interests in Shanghai Jupai to Shanghai Juxiang to guarantee Shanghai Jupai’s performance of relevant obligations and indebtedness under the consulting services agreement. In addition, the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai have completed the registration of the equity pledge under the agreement with the competent local authority. If Shanghai Jupai breaches its obligation under the consulting services agreement, Shanghai Juxiang, as pledgee, will be entitled to certain rights, including the right to sell the pledged equity interests. This pledge will remain effective until all the guaranteed obligations are performed.

Voting Rights Proxy Agreement.     Under the amended and restated voting rights proxy agreement among Shanghai Juxiang and the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai dated January 8, 2014, each shareholder of Shanghai Jupai irrevocably appointed Shanghai Juxiang as its attorney-in-fact to exercise on such shareholder’s behalf any and all rights that such shareholder has in respect of his equity interests in Shanghai Jupai, including but limited to the power to vote on its behalf on all matters of Shanghai Jupai requiring shareholder approval in accordance with the articles of association of Shanghai Jupai. The proxy agreement will remain in effect unless Shanghai Juxiang terminates the agreement by giving a 30-day prior written notice or gives its consent to the termination by Shanghai Jupai.

Consulting Services Agreement.     Pursuant to the amended and restated consulting services agreement between Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai Juxiang dated January 8, 2014, Shanghai Juxiang has the exclusive right to provide consulting services to Shanghai Jupai relating to Shanghai Jupai’s business, including but not limited to business consulting services, human resources development, and business development. Shanghai Juxiang exclusively owns any intellectual property rights arising from the performance of this agreement. Shanghai Juxiang has the right to determine the service fees based on Shanghai Jupai’s actual operation on a quarterly basis. This agreement will be effective as long as Shanghai Jupai exists. Shanghai Juxiang may terminate this agreement at any time by giving a prior written notice to Shanghai Jupai.

Amendment to Agreements.   Pursuant to the Amendment to Agreements entered into by Shanghai Jupai, the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai Juxiang dated October 9, 2014, the Operating Agreement was amended, pursuant to which, the shareholders of Shanghai Jupai must appoint candidates recommended by Shanghai Juxiang as the director, general manager, CFO and other senior managers.

Contractual Arrangement with Shanghai E-Cheng

The following is a summary of the currently effective contractual arrangements by and among Shanghai Baoyi, Shanghai E-Cheng, and the shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng.

Exclusive Support Agreement.     Pursuant to the exclusive support agreement between Shanghai Baoyi and Shanghai E-Cheng dated May 14, 2014, Shanghai Baoyi provides Shanghai E-Cheng with a series of consulting services on an exclusive basis and is entitled to receive related fees. This agreement will be effective as long as Shanghai E-Cheng exists. Shanghai Baoyi is entitled to terminate the agreement early if (i) the Shanghai E-Cheng breaches the agreement, and within 30 days upon written notice, fails to rectify its breach, take sufficient, effective and timely measures to eliminate the effects of breach, and compensate for any losses incurred by the breach; (ii) the applicable consolidated VIE is bankrupt or is subject to any liquidation procedures and such procedures are not revoked within seven days; or (iii) due to any event of force majeure, Shanghai E-Cheng’s failure to perform its obligations under the agreement lasts for over 20 days. Except as provided in the preceding sentence, Shanghai Baoyi is entitled to terminate the agreement early at any time by sending a written notice 20 days in advance, for any reason. The agreement does not include a provision for early termination by Shanghai E-Cheng. Unless expressly provided by this agreement, without prior written consent of Shanghai Baoyi, Shanghai E-Cheng may not engage any third party to provide the services offered by Shanghai Baoyi under this agreement.

Loan Agreements.     Pursuant to the loan agreement among Shanghai Baoyi and the shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng dated April 28, 2014, Shanghai Baoyi made loans in an aggregate amount of RMB1.0 million (US$0.2 million) to the shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng solely for the incorporation and capitalization of Shanghai E-Cheng. Pursuant to the loan agreement, the shareholders must repay the loans one time upon the maturity date of the loan and Shanghai Baoyi has the right to use the loan to, or designate a third party to, buy all of the equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng held by the shareholders. The loan is interest free and the term of the loan is (i) the expiration of 20 years from the date of the loan agreement, (ii) the expiration of Shanghai Baoyi’s operation term or (iii) the expiration of Shanghai E-Cheng’s operation term whichever is the earliest. Shanghai Baoyi can require the shareholders to and the shareholders may apply to repay all or a portion of the loan before the maturity date with a 30 days prior written notice. Under each of the circumstances, Shanghai Baoyi is entitled to, or designate a third party to, buy all or a portion of the shareholders’ equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng on a pro rata basis based on the amount of the repaid principal of the loan.

Exclusive Call Option Agreement.     Under the exclusive call option agreement among Shanghai Baoyi, Shanghai E-Cheng and the its shareholders dated May 14, 2014, each of the shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng irrevocably and unconditionally granted to Shanghai Baoyi or its designee an option to purchase at any time, to the extent permitted under PRC law, all or a portion of his equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng. Also, Shanghai Baoyi or its designee has the right to acquire any and all of the assets of Shanghai E-Cheng. Without Shanghai Baoyi’s prior written consent, Shanghai E-Cheng’s shareholders cannot transfer their equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng, and Shanghai E-Cheng cannot transfer its assets. The acquisition price for the shares or assets will be the corresponding capital contribution in Shanghai E-Cheng’s registered capital or the corresponding assets’ net booking value, or, if the minimum amount of consideration permitted under the PRC law is higher than the capital contribution or the net booking value, will be such minimum amount at the time of the exercise of the option. The agreement will not be terminated until after all of the equity interest and assets of Shanghai E-Cheng have been transferred to Shanghai Baoyi or its designee.

Equity Interest Pledge Agreement.     Under the equity pledge agreement among Shanghai Baoyi, Shanghai E-Cheng and its shareholders dated May 14, 2014, the shareholders pledged all of their equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng to Shanghai Baoyi to guarantee the performance of all the obligations of Shanghai E-Cheng and its shareholders under the loan agreement, exclusive option agreement, voting rights proxy agreement and the equity interest pledge agreement. In addition, the shareholders of Shanghai E-Cheng have completed the registration of the equity pledge under the agreement with the competent local authority. If Shanghai E-Cheng or its shareholders breach any of their respective obligations under any of these agreements, Shanghai Baoyi, as pledgee, will be entitled to certain rights, including the right to sell the pledged equity interests. This pledge will remain effective until all the contractual obligations are performed and the guaranteed loan has been paid off.

Shareholder Voting Rights Proxy Agreement.     Under the voting rights proxy agreement among Shanghai Baoyi, Shanghai E-Cheng and its shareholders dated May 14, 2014, each shareholder of Shanghai E-Cheng irrevocably appointed a nominee authorized by Shanghai Baoyi as its attorney-in-fact to exercise on such shareholder’s behalf any and all rights that such shareholder has in respect of his equity interests in Shanghai E-Cheng, including but limited to the power to vote on its behalf on all matters of Shanghai E-Cheng requiring shareholder approval in accordance with the articles of association of Shanghai E-Cheng. The initial term of the proxy agreement is 20 years and it may be automatically extended with a 30-day prior written notice given by Shanghai E-Cheng in a yearly basis.

In the opinion of our PRC counsel, AllBright Law Offices, the contractual arrangements with respect to Shanghai Jupai and Shanghai E-Cheng are valid, binding and enforceable under current PRC laws. However, as advised by our PRC legal counsel, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations and rules, including the laws and regulations governing the enforcement and performance of our contractual arrangement in the event of any imposition of statutory liens, bankruptcy and criminal proceedings. Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may in the future take a view that is contrary to the above opinion of our PRC counsel. We have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that if the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our business do not comply with PRC government restrictions on foreign investment in our businesses, we could be subject to severe penalties, including being prohibited from continuing operations. See “ Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business and Industry — We may fail to obtain and maintain licenses and permits necessary to conduct our operations in China, and our business may be materially and adversely affected as a result of any changes in the laws and regulations governing the financial services industry in China” and “ Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — . Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.”

D.Property, Plant and Equipment

Our principal executive offices are located on premises comprising approximately 3,50013,130 square meters in Shanghai, China. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we have in aggregate 5079 client centers in Shanghai, Beijing, Hangzhou, Shenzhen, Suzhou, Chengdu, Tianjin, Ningbo, Nanjing, Xiamen, Wuhan, Chongqing, Nantong, Guangzhou, Qingdao, Shenyang, Changzhou, Qidong, Cixi, Fuzhou, Ha’erbin, Jiaxing, Quanzhou, Taiyuan, Wenzhou, Wuxi, Xi’an, Yiwu and Yuyao.other 15 cities. We lease our premises from unrelated third parties. Most of the lessors for the leased premises either has valid title to the property and each lessor has proper authorization from the title owner to sublease the property. Below is a summary of the term of our leases by cities and we plan to renew these leases when they expire or relocate upon equal or more favorable leasing terms: