UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

OR

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

OR

¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number: 001-33911

 

 

 

RENESOLA LTD

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

 

British Virgin Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

7/F, Block B, Future Land Holdings Tower
No. 8 Baoqun5, Lane 388, Zhongjiang Road

Yaozhuang Town

Jiashan County

Zhejiang Province 314117

People’s Republic of ChinaPutuo District, Shanghai 200062

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Yuanyuan (Maggie) MaWeiguo Zhou
Interim Chief Financial Officer

7/F, Block B, Future Land Holdings Tower
No. 8 Baoqun5, Lane 388, Zhongjiang Road

Yaozhuang County

Jiashan Town

Zhejiang Province 314117Putuo District, Shanghai 200062

People’s Republic of China

Tel: +86-573-8477-3321+86 21 6280-9180

Fax: +86-573-8477-3383+ 86 21 6280-5600

E-mail: yuanyuan.ma@renesola.comweiguo.zhou@renesolapower.com

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered

American Depositary Shares, each representing

two

New York Stock Exchange
10 shares, no par value per share

 New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

203,205,688

381,027,002 shares, no par value per share, as of December 31, 20152017, among which 348,100 shares represented by 34,810 ADSs were held by the depositary for the ADSs for future exercise or vest of our awards under our 2007 share incentive plan.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes  ¨    No    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x   No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x   No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.filer or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and large accelerated filer”“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ¨Accelerated filer   ¨Non-accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer  Emerging growth company ¨

 

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards † provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP   x    International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board  ¨    Other  ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17  ¨    Item 18  ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

 

 

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

 

 

 

table of contents

 

  Page
INTRODUCTION1
  
PART I 2
ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS2
ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE2
ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION2
ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY3640
ITEM 4A.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS5965
ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS5965
ITEM 6.DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES8986
ITEM 7.MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS9895
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION10097
ITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING10197
ITEM 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION10299
ITEM 11.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK113109
ITEM 12.DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES114110
PART II 115111
ITEM 13.DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES115111
ITEM 14.MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS115111
ITEM 15.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES116112
ITEM 16A.AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT118114
ITEM 16B.CODE OF ETHICS118114
ITEM 16C.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES118114
ITEM 16D.EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES119114
ITEM 16E.PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS119115
ITEM 16F.CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT120115
ITEM 16G.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE120116
ITEM 16H.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE120117
PART III 120117
ITEM 17FINANCIAL STATEMENTS120117
ITEM 18FINANCIAL STATEMENTS120117
ITEM 19.EXHIBITS120117

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Unless otherwise indicated and except where the context otherwise requires, references in this annual report on Form 20-F to:

 

·“we,” “us,” “our company,” “our” or “ReneSola” refers to ReneSola Ltd, a British Virgin Islands company, its predecessor entities and its subsidiaries;

 

·“China” or “PRC” refers to the People’s Republic of China, excluding, for the purpose of this annual report on Form 20-F only, Taiwan, and the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau;

 

·“RMB” or “Renminbi” refers to the legal currency of China; all references to “$,” “dollars” and “U.S. dollars” refer to the legal currency of the United States; all references to “£” and “pounds sterling” refer to the legal currency of the United Kingdom; all references to “€” or “Euro” refer to the official currency of the European Union and the currency that is used in certain of its member states;

 

·“ADSs” refers to our American depositary shares, each of which represents two10 shares, and “ADRs” refers to the American depositary receipts that evidence our ADSs; and

 

·“shares” refers to shares of ReneSola Ltd with no par value.value;

·“DG projects” refers to distributed generation solar power projects, including ground-mounted distributed generation projects and rooftop distributed generation projects;

·“FIT” refers to feed-in tariff(s), the government guaranteed and subsidized electricity sale price at which solar power projects can sell to the national power grids, which is set by the central government;

·“ground-mounted projects” refers to solar power projects built on the ground, consisting of ground-mounted DG projects and utility-scale projects;

·“ground-mounted DG projects” refers to small-scale ground-mounted projects with lower grid connection voltage grade and with a substantial portion of the electricity generated to be consumed within the substation area of the grid connection points;

·“rooftop DG projects” refers to distributed generation solar power projects built on roof tops; and

·“utility-scale projects” refers to ground-mounted projects that are not ground-mounted DG projects.

In September 2017, we completed a non-cash restructuring following which, among other things, substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business were transferred into ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Upon the closing of this restructuring, all the issued shares of ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd were transferred to our chairman and chief executive officer. As a result, we have transformed into a solar project developer and operator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the world. As of the date of this annual report, our business includes the development and sale of solar power projects as a developer and the sale of electricity generated by the solar power projects operated by us as a power producer, or IPP. As of December 31, 2017, our debt-to-asset ratio, which is total liabilities divided by total assets, was improved and decreased to 73.0% from 93.9% as of December 31, 2016.

On February 10, 2017, we executed a ratio change for our ADR program. As a result, effective from February 10, 2017, the number of our shares represented by each ADS has been changed from two shares to 10 shares, or the ADS Ratio Change. For our ADS holders, this ADS Ratio Change had the same effect as a one-for-five reverse split. No new shares were issued in connection with the ADS Ratio Change. The ADS Ratio Change affected all ADS holders uniformly and did not reduce any ADS holder’s percentage ownership interest in us, except for minor adjustments that may result from the treatment of fractional ADSs. Proportionate voting rights and other rights and preferences of the ADS holders were not reduced by the ADS Ratio Change, subject to the treatment of fractional ADSs. Unless we indicate otherwise, all ADS and per ADS data in this annual report have been retrospectively adjusted to give effect to the ADS Ratio Change.

 

All discrepancies in any table between the amounts identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.

 

Consistent with industry practice, we measure our solar wafer manufacturing capacity and production output in watts, or W, or megawatts, or MW, representing 1,000,000 W, of power-generating capacity. We believe MW is a more appropriate unit to measure our manufacturing capacity and production output compared to pieces of wafers, as our solar wafers differ in size, thickness, power output and conversion efficiency. We manufacture both monocrystalline and multicrystalline wafers, and solar cells using these two types of wafers have different conversion efficiencies.

For disclosure of operating data as of and after January 1, 2013 and prior to January 1, 2014, we have assumed an average conversion efficiency rate of 19.0% and 17.8% for solar cells using our monocrystalline wafers and multicrystalline wafers, respectively. Based on this conversion efficiency, for wafers produced on or after January 1, 2013 and prior to January 1, 2014, we have assumed that (i) each 125 mm by 125 mm monocrystalline wafer can generate approximately 2.7 W of power, (ii) each 156 mm by 156 mm monocrystalline wafer can generate approximately 4.2 W of power and (iii) each 156 mm by 156 mm multicrystalline wafer can generate approximately 4.2 W of power.

For disclosure of operating data as of and after January 1, 2014 and prior to January 1, 2015, we have assumed an average conversion efficiency rate of 19.2% and 17.8% for solar cells using our monocrystalline wafers and multicrystalline wafers, respectively. Based on this conversion efficiency, for wafers produced on or after January 1, 2014 and prior to January 1, 2015, we have assumed that (i) each 125 mm by 125 mm monocrystalline wafer can generate approximately 2.88 W of power, (ii) each 156 mm by 156 mm monocrystalline wafer can generate approximately 4.45 W of power and (iii) each 156 mm by 156 mm multicrystalline wafer can generate approximately 4.23 W of power. Power generation assumptions for each wafer may change in the future.

For disclosure of operating data as of and after January 1, 2015 and prior to January 1, 2016, we have assumed an average conversion efficiency rate of 19.5% and 18.35% for solar cells using our monocrystalline wafers and multicrystalline wafers, respectively. Based on this conversion efficiency, for wafers produced on or after January 1, 2015 and prior to January 1, 2016, we have assumed that (i) each 156 mm by 156 mm monocrystalline wafer can generate approximately 4.55 W of power and (ii) each 156 mm by 156 mm multicrystalline wafer can generate approximately 4.34 W of power. Power generation assumptions for each wafer may change in the future.

We also measure our ingot manufacturing capacity and production output in MW based on our general yield, in MW, of solar wafers under our current manufacturing process.

All references to “PV” are to photovoltaic. The photovoltaic effect is a process by which sunlight is converted into electricity.

This annual report on Form 20-F includes our audited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20142016 and 20152017 and our audited consolidated income statements, statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015.2015, 2016 and 2017.

 

This annual report contains translations of certain Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollars at the rate of RMB6.4778RMB6.5063 to $1.00, the noon buying rate in effect on December 31, 20152017 as set forth in the H.10 Statistical Release of the Federal Reserve Bank Board. We make no representation that the Renminbi or dollar amounts referred to in this annual report on Form 20-F could have been or could be converted into dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on your investment.” On April 22, 2016,20, 2018, the noon buying rate was RMB6.5004RMB6.29 to $1.00.

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

 

Not Applicable.applicable.

 

ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

 

Not Applicable.applicable.

 

ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION

 

A.Selected Financial Data

 

Our Selected Consolidated Financial Data

 

In September 2017, we completed a non-cash restructuring to dispose of substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Transaction with our Chief Executive Officer and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd.” for details.

The following table presents the selected data from the consolidated income statementsfinancial information of our company. The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 20142016 and 20152017 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected data from the consolidated income statementsstatement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 20112013 and 20122014 and the consolidated balance sheetsheets data as of December 31, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013 are derived2015 have been revised from our previously audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this annual report.report on Form 20-F to give effect to those changes. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” included elsewhere in this annual report. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period.

  

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands, except percentage, share and per share data) 
Consolidated Statement of Income Data               
Net revenues(1) $985,279  $969,132  $1,519,635  $1,561,497  $1,282,031 
Cost of revenues(2)  (885,332)  (1,007,269)  (1,406,530)  (1,352,214)  (1,094,157)
Gross profit (loss)  99,947   (38,137)  113,105   209,283   187,874 
Operating (expenses) income:                    
Sales and marketing  (21,127)  (31,203)  (75,595)  (93,067)  (72,295)
General and administrative  (38,550)  (50,882)  (55,633)  (67,294)  (59,290)
Research and development  (47,055)  (44,102)  (46,452)  (52,575)  (43,905)

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands, except percentage, share and per share data) 
Other operating (expenses) income  18,327   1,656   45,886   11,870   16,920 
Impairment of long-lived assets     (6,438)  (202,757)      
Goodwill impairment     (6,161)         
Intangible asset impairment     (3,764)         
Total operating expenses  (88,405)  (140,894)  (334,551)  (201,066)  (158,570)
Income (loss) from operations  11,542   (179,031)  (221,446)  8,217   29,304 
Non-operating income (expenses):                    
Interest income  7,862   7,118   8,443   5,010   2,875 
Interest expense  (37,190)  (50,629)  (52,109)  (49,016)  (43,418)
Foreign exchange (losses) gains  6,612   1,386   (368)  (27,009)  (2,137)
Gains on repurchase of convertible notes  28,350         7,048   13,693 
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net  (15,297)  (54)  634   6,058   (6,031)
Fair value change of warrant liability        3,203   7,455   1,313 
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries  (193)        8,253    
Other-than-temporary impairment loss on available-for-sale investment  (6,207)            
Total non-operating (expenses)  (16,063)  (42,179)  (40,197)  (42,201)  (33,705)
Income (loss) before income tax, non-controlling interests  (4,520)  (221,210)  (261,643)  (33,984)  (4,401)
Income tax benefit (expenses)  4,851   (21,352)  2,723   350   (674)
Net income (loss)  331   (242,562)  (258,920)  (33,634)  (5,075)
Less:  Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests  2   (47)  (4)  (4)   
Net income (loss) attributable to holders of ordinary shares $333  $(242,515) $(258,916) $(33,630) $(5,075)
Earnings (loss) per share:                    
Basic $0.00  $(1.40) $(1.42) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Diluted $0.00  $(1.40) $(1.42) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Earnings (loss) per ADS:                    
Basic $0.00  $(2.81) $(2.85) $(0.33) $(0.05)
Diluted $0.00  $(2.81) $(2.85) $(0.33) $(0.05)
Weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share:                    
Basic  173,496,901   172,671,369   182,167,908   203,550,049   204,085,041 
Diluted  173,870,162   172,671,369   182,167,908   203,550,049   204,085,041 
Other Consolidated Financial Data                    
Gross margin  10.1%  (3.9)%  7.4%  13.4%  14.7%
Operating margin  1.2%  (18.5)%  (14.6)%  0.5%  2.3%
Net margin  0.0%  (25.0)%  (17.0)%  (2.2)%  (0.4)%

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands, except percentage, share and per share data) 
Selected Consolidated Operating Data                    
Solar power products shipped (in MW)(3)  1,294.8   2,219.3   3,218.0   2,878.2   2,748.8 

2

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017 
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data               
Continuing operations:                    
Net revenues $0  $7,581,339  $116,330,936  $80,504,734  $102,973,999 
Income (loss) from operations  (2,240,190)  1,635,413   16,318,426   2,348,663   6,555,610 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax  (1,331,332)  10,474,640   20,213,270   94,482   3,199,831 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(1)  (257,584,206)  (44,104,661)  (25,288,392)  (34,792,733)  31,257,707 
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations                    
Basic  (0.01)  0.05   0.10   0.00   0.01 
Diluted  (0.01)  0.05   0.10   0.00   0.01 
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations                    
Basic  (1.41)  (0.22)  (0.12)  (0.17)  0.13 
Diluted  (1.41)  (0.22)  (0.12)  (0.17)  0.13 
Weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share:                    
Basic  182,167,908   203,550,049   204,085,041   202,229,767   246,899,286 
Diluted  182,167,908   204,045,254   204,222,541   202,403,904   246,905,289 

 

(1)Includes $6.8 million, $63.7 million, $3.1 million, $2.9 millionDiscontinued operations relate to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and $0.05 millionsolar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business, which were disposed of net revenues from products sold to related parties in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.the third quarter of 2017, the transaction of which was completed on September 29, 2017.

 

(2)Includes $6.7 million, $68.3 million, $3.6 million, $2.7 million and $0.05 million of cost of revenues of solar products sold to related parties in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(3)Includes solar ingots, wafers, cells and modules shipped, as well as solar wafers and modules shipped from processing services.

  As of December 31, 
  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands) 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data                    
Cash and cash equivalents $379,039  $93,283  $86,773  $99,848  $38,045 
Restricted cash  58,335   174,828   262,127   121,862   140,338 
Accounts receivable and notes receivable, net  129,636   216,835   236,576   125,743   161,166 
Inventories  154,182   254,880   359,577   357,361   193,171 
Total current assets  832,922   873,779   1,206,798   859,531   637,750 
Property, plant and equipment, net  980,165   1,102,562   863,093   750,298   630,462 
Advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment  25,867   8,317   2,214   1,756   382 
Advances to suppliers—noncurrent  17,644   5,928   5,627       
Total assets  1,948,976   2,058,325   2,139,751   1,669,008   1,346,320 
Short-term borrowings  570,894   733,618   673,096   654,675   668,788 
Advances from customers—current  58,238   40,384   99,499   84,412   28,101 
Total current liabilities  989,377   1,442,229   1,712,973   1,336,792   1,103,862 
Total equity  601,141   364,403   169,107   135,156   111,934 
Total liabilities and equity $1,948,976  $2,058,325  $2,139,751  $1,669,008   1,346,320 
  As of December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data                    
Cash and cash equivalents $3,978,198  $4,690,077  $14,581,590  $3,964,896  $13,429,301 
Total assets  2,139,750,677   1,669,007,526   1,346,319,585   1,088,405,688   335,698,792 
Total liabilities  1,970,734,133   1,533,851,207   1,234,385,673   1,022,259,908   245,216,322 
Total equity  169,016,544   135,156,319   111,933,912   66,145,780   90,482,470 
Common share capital  -   -   -   -   - 
Number of common share issued  204,346,064   204,846,064   203,331,288   202,478,702   382,027,002 

 

B.Capitalization and Indebtedness

 

Not Applicable.applicable.

 

C.Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

 

Not Applicable.applicable.

 

D.Risk Factors

 

Risks Related to Our Business

 

Our financial leverage may hamper our ability to expand and may materially affect our results of operations. Our borrowing levels and the tightening of credit generally in the industry in the PRC may adversely impact our ability to obtain new financing.

 

We have relied on working capital, short-term and long-term borrowingsfinancing, including development loan financings, construction loan financings and project financings, and capital markets financingmarket financings to fund a portion of our capital requirements and expect to continue to do so in the future. We have significant borrowings from commercial banks in China,These financings, which consist primarily of short-term borrowings.borrowings, long-term borrowings and other long-term liabilities, are primarily from financial institutions and fund investors globally, as well as financing lease companies in China. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had short-term borrowings of $668.8$6.6 million, of which $415.8 million was attributable to trade financing. As of December 31, 2015, we also had long-term borrowings of $38.8 million. Our$32.5 million, other long-term liabilities of $67.5 million and a debt-to-asset ratio of 73.0%.

3

Although we had a working capital deficit was $477.3 million and $466.1of $24.9 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively.


The2017, the amount of our borrowings and financing liabilities could constrain our operational flexibility, including requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows to be set aside to service our debt obligations, increasing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing. Furthermore, the PRC government may pass measures to tighten credit, including trade financing, available in the PRC market.credit. All of the above may impair our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all. In addition, we may not be able to raise necessary funding on favorable terms, or at all, to refinance our debt obligations. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to service our debt obligations, our business, prospects and financial conditions may be materially and adversely affected. If we fail to obtain additional sources of financing, we may not be able to continue to fund our operations or business.

 

We intend to obtain additional debt obligations to finance our operations and future expansion. To the extent we are successful in obtaining additional financing, we will allocate an increasing portion of our cash flows to service our debt obligations. This could impair our ability to make necessary capital expenditures, develop business opportunities or make strategic acquisitions. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flows from operations in the future to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures, in which case we may seek additional financing, dispose of certain assets or seek to refinance some or all of our debt. In addition, these alternatives may not be implemented on satisfactory terms, if at all. In the event that we are unable to meet our debt obligations when they become due or if our creditors take legal action against us for repayment upon any default, we may have to liquidate our long-term assets to repay our creditors. This would materially and adversely affect our operations and prevent us from successfully implementing our business strategy. In addition, we may have difficulty converting our long-term assets into current assets in such a situation and may suffer losses from the sale of our long-term assets and may not be able to continue our business.

 

Volatile market and industry trends, in particular, unfavorable changes in supply or demand for solar power products throughout the value chain, and continued substantial downward pressureOur success depends on the pricessuccess of our products willrestructuring.

In September 2017, we entered into a share purchase and subscription agreement with ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., a former subsidiary, and Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer. Pursuant to the agreement, we effected a non-cash restructuring following which, among other things, substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business were transferred into ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Upon the closing of this restructuring, all the shares of ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd were transferred to to Mr. Li. As a result, we have transformed into a negative impact onsolar project developer and operator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the world. As of December 31, 2017, our businessdebt-to-asset ratio, which is total liabilities divided by total assets, was improved and decreased to 73.0% from 93.9% as of December 31, 2016. We believe that this transaction has alleviated our going-concern risks and de-listing risks and enhanced our capital raising capabilities. However, we cannot assure you that we can continue to improve our financial positions and results of operations.

The sales volume and prices of our solar power products depend on a variety of factors, including supply and demand for solar power products in key solar markets. The solar industry has seen an increase in demand for solar power products due in part to In the improvement of global economic conditions since 2009, when the global economic downturn materially reduced demand for solar power products. Despite a recovery in demand, the prices of solar power products have been volatile in recent years due to the unstable supply of solar power products. The solar industry is expected to continue to be highly competitive. Increased production efficiencies and improved technologies may further reduce costs of polysilicon and other silicon raw materials, which have already declined significantly over the past few years. Potential further expansion of manufacturing capacity in the future by our competitors, by us or by potential new entrants into the market, given the relatively low barriers to entry, may result in continued excess capacity in the industry. In addition, decreases in prices of other energies such as oil, electricity and wind power may also negatively affect the demand for solar power products, as well as projects.

If the markets for solar power products continue to suffer from oversupply resulting in reduced prices or if we are unable to lower our costs in line with the decline in prices, by, for example, increasing our manufacturing efficiency, securing polysilicon feedstock and consumables at lower costs, achieving technological advances and/or other means reasonably available to us, our business and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing orders in one or more markets may result in additional costs to our customers and disruptions in such markets and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial conditions and prospects.

Trade actions initiated in the United States or other jurisdictions, including the European Union and India, and the resulting anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed on solar imports in those jurisdictions have caused disruptions in the solar markets, resulted in additional costs to our customers and materially and adversely affected our business. Specifically:


·In 2011, solar panel manufacturing companies in the United States filed anti-dumping and countervailing duty petitions with the U.S. government, which resulted in the institution of anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations relating to imports into the United States of crystalline silicon photovoltaic, or CSPV, cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. In November 2012, the U.S. International Trade Commission, or the USITC, upheld higher anti-dumping and countervailing duty tariffs that had been imposed in October 2012 by the U.S. Department of Commerce, or the USDOC. As the preliminary results of the first administrative review process for the 2012 to 2013 review period were issued by USDOC in January 2015, the anti-dumping rate for approximately 20 Chinese exporters (including us) was 1.82%, significantly below the average net cash deposit rate initially projected. The countervailing duty rate applicable to us was 15.68%. In July 2015, the USDOC issued its final results for the administrative review process for the 2012 to 2013 review period, which set an anti-dumping duty rate applicable to us at 9.67% and countervailing duty rate applicable to us at 20.94%. In August 2015, the U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the USITC’s final determination. In December 2015, the U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the USDOC’s final determination. The rates at which duties will be assessed and payable for the first review period will be subject to the completion of the ongoing litigation at U.S. Court of International Trade. Decisions on these appeals are not expected until late 2016 or 2017;

A second and third administrative review, which will assess duties for our imports into the United States during December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014 and December 1, 2014 through November 30, 2015, and which could be lower or higher than the deposit rates for these imports, have been initiated. The actual duty rates at which entries of covered merchandise will be finally assessed may differ from the announced deposit rates because they are subject to completion of ongoing administrative reviews of the anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders, expected to be in July 2016 and September 2016. The final determination on the deposit rates may affect our financial condition and results of operations;

·On December 31, 2013, SolarWorld Industries America, Inc., the U.S. subsidiary of SolarWorld AG, filed a new trade action at the USDOC and the USITC accusing Chinese producers of certain CSPV cells and modules of dumping their products into the United States and of receiving countervailable subsidies from the Chinese authorities. This trade action also accused Taiwanese producers of certain CSPV cells and modules of dumping their products into the United States. Excluded from these new actions were those Chinese-origin solar products covered by the 2012 rulings detailed above. We were identified as one of a number of Chinese producers exporting subject goods to the U.S. market. We also have affiliated U.S. operations that import goods subject to these new investigations. We were named as one of the mandatory respondents related to an anti-dumping investigation, so that we received an individual rate based on an investigation of our U.S. imports. We have fully cooperated and intend to continue to cooperate with the investigation proceedings and to pursue the best outcome. On December 16, 2014, the USDOC announced its affirmative final determinations in the anti-dumping duty investigations of imports of certain CSPV products from China and Taiwan, and the countervailing duty investigation of imports of certain CSPV products from China. The USDOC determined that imports of certain CSPV products were dumped in the United States from China and Taiwan and imports of certain CSPV products from China received countervailable subsidies. Following the USDOC’s determination, on January 21, 2015, the USITC announced its affirmative final determination that imports of certain CSPV products from mainland China and Taiwan materially injured the domestic industry. As a result of the USITC’s affirmative determinations, the USDOC issued countervailing duty orders on imports of these products from mainland China and anti-dumping duty orders on imports of these products from China and Taiwan. On February 18, 2015, the USDOC amended its final affirmative countervailing duty determination to correct an error regarding the inclusion of a subsidy program that was not properly reflected on the record of the investigation. Under the amended final determination of the USDOC, we received a final dumping cash deposit rate of 78.42% and a final countervailing cash deposit rate of 38.43% for our U.S. imports. The U.S. system imposes final duties retroactively, so that the actual duty rates at which our U.S. imports will be finally assessed may differ from the announced cash deposit rates based on the completion of administrative reviews which will be conducted related to these anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders. On April 7, 2016, the USDOC initiated its first administrative review, which will assess duties for our imports into the United States covering the period July 31, 2014 through January 31, 2016. The first administrative review is anticipated to conclude by around the first half of 2017. The final dumping and countervailing duties resulting from the first administrative review may negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations;

·On June 4, 2013, the European Union imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on Chinese solar panels at the starting rate of 11.8% until August 6, 2013, and an increased rate of an average of 47.6% from that date. However, on July 27, 2013, the European Union trade commissioner announced his satisfaction with an offer of a price undertaking submitted by Chinese solar panel exporters, including us, under which, according to reports, Chinese solar panel exporters have agreed to limit their exports of solar panels to the European Union and for no less than a minimum price per watt, in exchange for the European Union’s agreement to forgo the imposition of anti-dumping duties on these imports of solar panels from China. The accord was approved by the European Commission on August 2, 2013. According to the accord, solar panels imported into the European Union from China after the annual quota is reached will be subject to anti-dumping duties. According to the reported official statements by the European Union trade commissioner, this accord also could be used to resolve the parallel anti-subsidy investigation, commenced by the European Union on November 8, 2012, prior to the imposition of provisional anti-subsidy measures. On August 7, 2013, the European Commission announced that it would not impose any provisional measures in its anti-subsidy investigation. On December 5, 2013, the European Council announced its final decision imposing definitive anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties on imports of CSPV cells and modules originating from or consigned from China. An average duty of 47.7%, consisting of the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties, will be applied for a period of two years beginning on December 6, 2013 to Chinese solar panel exporters who cooperated with the European Commission’s investigations. On the same day, the European Commission announced its decision to confirm the acceptance of the price undertaking offered by Chinese export producers with the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Product in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding and to extend the price undertaking to the anti-subsidy proceeding, which will exempt them from both anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties;

Starting in 2014, the European Commission audited the top eight solar companies in terms of shipments with respect to their compliance with the price undertaking. In March 2015, the European Commission notified us of a potential compliance issue with the undertaking agreement, mainly due to the impracticality of monitoring our OEM producers and undertaking practice. In June 2015, the European Commission notified us that they had excluded us from the companies from which they had accepted the undertaking. As a result, we will have to pay the anti-dumping duty and countervailing duty when we export products that originated from China. However, our OEM products manufactured outside of China are not subject to anti-dumping duty or countervailing duty and can be transacted freely without any duties and any limitation of the undertaking agreement;

On December 5, 2015, the European Commission initiated expiry (sunset) reviews of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures on imports of CSPV modules and key components (i.e., cells) originating in or consigned from China. The result of the expiry reviews can only be either extending the measures at their existing level or terminating the measures, and the measures cannot be amended. Also on December 5, 2015, the European Commission initiated an interim (changed circumstances) review limited to the question whether cells should be excluded from the scope of the measures. The anti-dumping and countervailing measures on imports of CSPV modules and key components (i.e., cells) originating in or consigned from China will, in any event remain in force for the duration of the reviews and may subsequently be extended for up to five years. The reviews must be terminated by March 4, 2017;

As the European Union is the largest market for solar power products, and China is the largest producer of solar panels, anti-dumping and/or countervailing duties imposed on imports of solar power products into the European Union from China will continue to affect the stability of the solar markets;

On March 15, 2015, the European Commission opened an investigation into how it should adapt the Minimum Import Price to take account of price changes in the market for PV modules. The review was closed on January 6, 2016 without changing the Minimum Import Price adaptation mechanism;

·In November 2012, India initiated an anti-dumping investigation on imported solar products from China, Taiwan, the United States, and Malaysia. The scope of the Indian complaint was thin-film and CSPV cells and modules, as well as “glass and other suitable substrates.” On May 22, 2014, India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce released its final findings that certain exports from the United States, China, Taiwan and Malaysia have been dumped in the Indian market and recommended imposing additional duties ranging from $0.64 to $0.81 per watt of electricity produced on solar cell imports from these countries. However, in September 2014, India’s Ministry of Finance decided against imposing any such duties;

·Import restrictive proceedings initiated in China and any anti-dumping or countervailing duties imposed by Chinese authorities on silicon imports could increase the costs of polysilicon and hence our cost of production. In 2012, some solar power product producers in China filed anti-dumping and countervailing actions with the PRC Ministry of Commerce. In July and November 2012, the PRC Ministry of Commerce initiated an investigation into the import of polycrystalline silicon from the United States, the European Union and South Korea. On July 18, 2013, the PRC Ministry of Commerce announced that it would impose temporary security deposits on imports of solar-grade polysilicon at rates as high as 57% for U.S. suppliers and 48.7% for South Korean suppliers. On January 20, 2014, the PRC Ministry of Commerce announced the final action that it would impose a countervailing duty at the rate of 2.1%and an anti-dumping duty at rates ranging from 53.3% to 57% on imports of solar-grade polysilicon from U.S. suppliers and an anti-dumping duty at rates ranging from 2.4% to 48.7% on imports from South Korean suppliers in the next five years. On April 30, 2014, the PRC Ministry of Commerce announced the final action that it would impose a countervailing duty at the rate of 1.2% on imports of solar-grade polysilicon and an anti-dumping duty at rates ranging from 14.3% to 42% on imports of solar-grade polysilicon from European Union suppliers in the next two years. On August 14, 2014, the PRC Ministry of Commerce and the General Administration of Customs of the PRC announced that they will cease to accept applications for import business of solar-grade polycrystalline silicon starting from September 1, 2014. Importation of the above-mentioned silicon pursuant to import business contracts which were approved by the PRC Ministry of Commerce before September 1, 2014 is permitted to continue until the termination date of the respective contracts.Although we do not import any polysilicon from the United States, approximately 36.4% of our total polysilicon supply in 2015 was purchased from a South Korean supplier, which is subject to a 2.4% temporary security deposit imposed by China, and only approximately 2.1% of our total polysilicon supply in 2015 was purchased from a Germany supplier , which is not subject to temporary security deposit imposed by China, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to any such deposit requirements in the future;

·On May 14, 2014, the Australian Anti-Dumping Commission initiated an investigation into the alleged dumping of certain CSPV modules or panels exported to Australia from China. We were named as one of the mandatory respondents related to such anti-dumping investigation. We fully cooperated with the investigation proceedings. In December 2014, the Australian Anti-Dumping Commission published the Investigation Verification Report which indicated that the assessed dumping margin for ReneSola Australia is -0.3%. On April 7, 2015, the Australian Anti-Dumping Commission found that the alleged dumping had only caused a negligible injury to the Australian industry, according to a “Statement of the Essential Facts.” On this basis, the Commission later terminated the investigation on October 6, 2015. However, following an application for review by Tindo Manufacturing Pty Ltd, the sole manufacturer in Australia of certain crystalline silicon PV modules or panels, with the Anti-Dumping Review Panel on November 5, 2015, the decision to terminate the investigation was revoked by the Australian Anti-Dumping Review Panel on January 8, 2016, and the investigation resumes. As a result, although we only generated 3.6%, 3.7% and 2.1% of our total revenue from Australia in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, we cannot guarantee you that the final determination, if decided against us, will not materially and adversely affect our cash flows and operating results; and

·On December 5, 2014, the Canada Border Services Agency, or CBSA, initiated investigations on the alleged injurious dumping and subsidies of certain photovoltaic modules and laminates originating in or exported from China.  On June 3, 2015, the president of the CBSA made final determinations of dumping and subsidies with respect to the above products from China. The final margin of dumping for our multicrystalline modules with an export price of no less than RMB5.08 per watt and for our monocrystalline modules with an export price of no less than RMB6.31 per watt is 9.3%, and the subsidies rate for our module products is RMB0.003 per watt.On June 3, 2015, the CBSA released final determinations of dumping and subsidies which found dumping calculated by way of a ministerial specification based on a nonmarket economy finding applicable to all cooperative exporters and ascertained a Canadian solar-specific subsidies rate of RMB0.014 per watt. On July 3, 2015, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal determined that the Canadian industry was not negatively affected as a result of imported modules but was threatened with negative impact. As a result of these findings, definitive duties have been imposed on imports of Chinese solar modules into Canada starting on July 3, 2015. We have ceased exporting modules to Canada since the effectiveness of such definitive duties.

If we are unable to effectively manage these risks related to international sales, our ability to expand our business abroad will be materially and severely impaired and our cost of raw materials could increase. Other trade barriers in these and other markets, such as export requirements, taxes and other restrictions and expenses, may also be erected which could make our exports less competitive in some countries.

Our polysilicon manufacturing facilities may not achieve our planned utilization rate or operational efficiency, which may negatively affect our profit margin. Any issues with our polysilicon manufacturing facilities as a result of operating hazards and natural disasters may limit our ability to manufacture such products.

In 2012, we completed the construction of a polysilicon manufacturing facility in Meishan, Sichuan Province, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Sichuan ReneSola Silicon Material Co., Ltd., or Sichuan ReneSola, which was established in Sichuan Province in August 2007. We ramped up our polysilicon manufacturing facility in two phases. Phase I of our polysilicon facility had been in full operation since the beginning of 2011 and Phase II of the facility was completed in June 2013. Prior to our operation of the polysilicon manufacturing facility in Sichuan Province, we did not have any experience operating polysilicon production facilities. Manufacturing polysilicon is a highly complex chemical process and we may not be able to produce polysilicon of sufficient quantity and quality or at a cost comparable to or lower than those of other polysilicon manufacturers or on schedule to meet our wafer manufacturing requirements. Minor deviations in the manufacturing process can cause substantial decreases in yield and in some cases cause production to be suspended or to yield no output. In addition, our production cost was higher than previously expected due to continuous trial runs, system testing, purchases of trichlorosilane, or TCS, and minimal activated hydrogenation processes. At the end of September 2013, we concluded that our efforts to sufficiently reduce the cost of polysilicon production as compared to the prevailing market price were not successful. After conducting a further internal assessment, we determined that it was no longer feasible to operate our Phase I facility without incurring a loss and to recognize an impairment charge in our wafer segment accordingly. Production at the Phase I facility was permanently discontinued in October 2013. Our remaining Phase II polysilicon facility currently has an annual manufacturing capacity of 6,000 metric tons and was running in full capacity and helped to contribute positively to our cash flows in 2015.

If our remaining polysilicon production facility experiences any additional delays or defect in operations we may suffer a setback to our raw material procurement strategy. We may also fail to manufacture polysilicon of sufficient quantity, quality or at competitive costs compared to the polysilicon available from the market, thereby making our polysilicon manufacturing facility uneconomical to run, which would negatively impact our profit margin and financial results. If the price of polysilicon and other raw materials rise and we are required to make purchases at higher than anticipated market rates, our profit margin may be further negatively impacted. If our polysilicon production facility does not perform as planned we may be unable to recover our investments or be forced to write down the value of the assets.

Because our polysilicon manufacturing capabilities are concentrated in our manufacturing facilities in Sichuan Province, any problem in our facilities may limit our ability to manufacture such products. We may encounter problems in our manufacturing facilities as a result of, among other things, production failures, construction delays, human error, equipment malfunction or process contamination, which could seriously harm our operations. We may also experience fires, floods, droughts, power losses and similar events beyond our control that would affect our facilities. Operating hazards and natural disasters, such as earthquakes may also cause interruption to our operations, property and/or environmental damage as well as personal injuries, and any of these incidents may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. On April 20, 2013, a strong earthquake hit part of Sichuan Province, resulting in significant casualties and property damage. Also, in July 2013, flooding in Sichuan Province caused a delay in our polysilicon production. While we did not suffer any significant loss or experience any significant disruption due to the earthquake or the flooding mentioned above, if a similar disaster were to occur in the future that affects any place where we have major operations, our operations could be disrupted and affected by loss of personnel and damage to property. Although we carry business interruption insurance, losses incurred or payments required to be made by us due to operating hazards or natural disasters that are not fully insured may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.


Our long-lived assets may be subject to impairment.

We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable or that the useful life of the asset is shorter than originally estimated. We recognize an impairment loss in the event the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. The impairment charge recognized is based on the amount by which the carrying amount asset exceeds its fair value. At the end of September 2013, we concluded that our efforts to sufficiently reduce the cost of polysilicon production as compared to the prevailing market price were not successful. After conducting a further internal assessment we determined that it was no longer feasible to operate our Phase I facility without incurring a loss and to recognize the impairment charge in our wafer segment accordingly. Production at the Phase I facility was permanently discontinued in October 2013. Although we have not recorded any asset impairment since 2014, if we are forced to write down the value of our long-lived assets again in the future, these non-cash asset impairments could materially and negatively affect our results of operations in the period in which they are recorded.

We require a substantial amount of cash to fund our operations. If we fail to obtain additional capital when we require it, our prospects and future profitability may be materially and adversely affected.

We require a significant amount of cash to fund our operations. We require capital to fund any expansion of our manufacturing capacities and our research and development activities in order to remain competitive in the solar industry. Future expansions, changes in market conditions or other developments will also cause us to require additional funds. Due to prevailing market conditions and industry practice, we have been providing longer credit terms to a number of customers (as it has become customary in the industry to do so), which has had a negative effect on our cash flows. Such customers who have high credit worthiness may be granted longer credit terms; however, we do not amend contracts once delivery is deemed to have occurred. Moreover, as of December 31, 2015, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $466.1 million. While we had cash and cash equivalents of $38.0 million as of December 31, 2015 and operating cash flow of $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, we had short-term bank borrowings of $667.7 million as of December 31, 2015, all due within one year, and the current portion of our long-term bank borrowings amounted to $1.1 million as of December 31, 2015, which is not expected to be renewed.

As of December 31, 2015, several factors have raised substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future, including: (i)or we incurred a net loss of $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, (ii) as of December 31, 2015, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $466.1 million, and (iii) there was a put option heldare notified by the convertible bond holders, whereby on March 15, 2016 they could require us to repurchase for cash allNew York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, regarding any portion of their notes at anon-compliance, our market value and ADS price equal to 100% of the principle amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest. As of December 31, 2015, the convertible notes payable balance was $26.1 million. We subsequently repurchased all of the outstanding convertible notes in the first quarter of 2016. These factors could adversely affect our ability to meet our ongoing financing needs as well as to obtain third party financing, which is subject to a number of uncertainties, including our future financial condition, operations and reputation, general market conditions in our industry and economic, political and other conditions in China and elsewhere. For example, weakening global economic conditions and macroeconomic factors in the PRC, such as credit tightening policies implemented by the Chinese government, may negatively impact our ability to obtain financing in a timely manner or on commercially acceptable terms.

We may not be able to refinance our borrowings as they mature. In the event that we are unable to obtain extensions of these borrowings or sufficient alternative financing at reasonable terms to make repayments, as we do not expect to be able to generate sufficient cash from operating activities in 2016 to repay all of these borrowings, we may not be able to repay such borrowings in full or at all when due. If we were to default on the repayment of these borrowings, we would not be able to continue our operations as a going concern. Moreover, future turbulence in global economic conditions and the potential impact on the liquidity of financial institutions may have an adverse effect on our ability to fund our operations and future expansion through borrowings or our ability to borrow on terms that we believe to be reasonable, or at all. Our operations, results of operations and growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected if the global economic conditions worsen or do not improve.affected.


We face uncertainties in connection with the implementation of our business strategy to transform our business focus from wafer and module manufacturing to global energy efficient products and services and downstream solar power projects.

 

At the end of 2012, we started to implement our business strategy to transform the focus of our business fromWe were a solar wafer manufacturing to module manufacturing. The shift in our business focus was completed in 2013. In connection with this business transformation, we have implementedmanufacturer and later also became a numbermanufacturer of strategic initiatives, including increasing our module salespolysilicon and marketing staff and expanding our in-house module manufacturing capacity from 500 MW to 1.2 gigawatt, or GW, which we believe to have been executed with highly efficient equipment and advanced technologies.solar modules. Starting from early 2014, we began to expand our operations into the broader energy efficient products and services business and into downstream solar power projects. However,In September 2017, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to implement our business strategytransformed into a solar project developer and initiatives effectively and efficiently or that our transformation will result in improved production, sales or operating results or generate shareholder value inoperator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the long term. Moreover, as we shift our emphasis from solar product manufacturing to solar product-related and other energy-efficient product-related services we also have to compete with existing players in the services sectors including distribution and logistics companies, many of whom are established players with greater resources, longer relationships with customers, greater brand recognition and larger scales of production.world. Our ability to transform to and expand into the services business is also subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, having potentially greater operating costs, excess inventory and having lower shipments due to a greater focus on smaller projects and smaller customers.uncertainties.

 

Our solar power project initiatives require significant initial investments. These downstream expansion plans may include investments in project companies and joint ventures and forming strategic alliances with third parties. There is a risk that we may not be able to obtain the necessary funding to fully invest in these solar power projects, or that investments in these projects will significantly impact our working capital as a result of a slowdown in reinvestment of cash relative tocash. Additionally, our traditional wafer and module business. Additionally, ourprevious experience in the solar power products manufacturing industry may not be as relevant or applicable in the downstream solar power projects markets. If our transformation strategy and initiatives do not achieve their intended results, or if we do not compete successfully against existing players, in the services and downstream solar markets, our business, operations and financial results may be materially and adversely impacted. Furthermore, we may not be able to manage entities which we invest in or provide adequate resources to such entities to maximize the return on our investments. We may not be able to secure the government approvals or licenses required for construction and operation of solar power projects in a timely manner, or at all. In the case of potential joint ventures and strategic alliances with third parties, we may face risks associated with the sharing of proprietary information, loss of control of operations that are material to our business and profit sharing arrangements. We may also consider acquisitions of existing downstream players, in which we may face difficulties related to the integration of the operations and personnel of acquired businesses and the division of resources between our existing and acquired operations.

 

4

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in expandingoperating our business into the solar power projects markets along the solar power product value chain.markets. Any failure to successfully identify, execute and integrate our acquisitions, investments, joint ventures and alliances as part of entering into the solar power projects markets may have a material adverse impact on our growth, business prospects and results of operations, which could lead to a decline in the price of our ADSs.

Developing and operating solar power projects exposes us to different risks than producing solar power products. Our result of operations may be subject to fluctuations.

In a given period, our revenue was affected by a limited number of solar power projects that are under development and sold to third parties, and therefore subject to significant fluctuations. Although we intend to retain more projects for our IPP business in China, we will continue to develop and sell solar power projects to take advantage of attractive market opportunities. As a result, we may generate more of our revenues from the one-time sale of solar power projects for certain periods.

Development of solar power projects can take many months or years to complete and may be delayed for reasons beyond our control. They often require us to make some up-front payments for, among other things, land/rooftop use rights and permitting in advance of commencing construction, and revenue from these projects may not be recognized for several additional months following contract signing. Any inability or significant delays in entering into sales contracts with customers after making such up-front payments could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Furthermore, we may become constrained in our ability to expandsimultaneously fund our other investment in these projects.

In contrast to developing solar modules, developing solar power projects requires more management attention to negotiate the terms of our engagement and monitor the progress of the projects which may divert management's attention from other matters. Our revenue and liquidity may be adversely affected to the extent the market for solar power projects weakens or we are not able to successfully complete the customer acceptance testing due to technical difficulties, equipment failure, or adverse weather, and we are unable to sell our solar power projects at prices and on terms and timing that are acceptable to us.

We operate solar power projects and sell electricity to the local or national grid or other power purchasers such as commercial and industrial end users. As a result, we are subject to a variety of risks associated with intense market competition, changing regulations and policies, insufficient demand for solar power, technological advancements, failure of our power generation facilities and credit risks related to the power purchasers. If we cannot manage these risks, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Solar project development is challenging and may ultimately not be successful and miscalculations in planning a project may negatively affect our engineering, procurement and construction, or EPC, prices, all of which could increase our costs, delay or cancel a project, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and profit margins.

The development of solar projects involve numerous risks and uncertainties and requires extensive research, planning and due diligence. We may be required to incur significant amounts of capital expenditure for land/rooftop use rights, interconnection rights, preliminary engineering, permits, legal and other expenses before we can determine whether a solar power project is economically, technologically or otherwise feasible. Success in developing a solar power project is contingent upon, among other things:

·securing investment or development rights;

5

·securing suitable project sites, necessary rights of way, satisfactory land/rooftop use or access rights in the appropriate locations with capacity on the transmission grid and related permits, including completing environmental assessments and implementing any required mitigation measures;

·rezoning land, as necessary, to support a solar power project;

·negotiating satisfactory EPC agreements;

·negotiating and receiving required permits and approvals for project development from government authorities on schedule;

·completing all required regulatory and administrative procedures needed to obtain permits and agreements;

·procuring rights to interconnect the solar power project to the electric grid or to transmit energy;

·paying interconnection and other deposits, some of which are non-refundable;

·signing grid connection and dispatch agreements, power purchase agreements, or PPAs, or other arrangements that are commercially acceptable, including adequate for providing financing;

·obtaining project financing, including debt financing and own equity contribution; and

·negotiating favorable payment terms with suppliers;

·completing construction on schedule in a satisfactory manner.

Successful completion of a particular solar project may be adversely affected by numerous factors, including without limitation:

·unanticipated changes in project plans or defective or late execution;

·difficulties in obtaining and maintaining governmental permits, licenses and approvals required by existing laws and regulations or additional regulatory requirements not previously anticipated;

·potential challenges from local residents, environmental organizations, and others who may not support the project;

·uncertainty in the timing of grid connection;

·the inability to procure adequate financing with acceptable terms, especially for EPC;

·unforeseeable engineering problems, construction or other unexpected delays and contractor performance shortfalls;

·labor, equipment and materials supply delays, shortages or disruptions, or work stoppages;

·adverse weather, environmental and geological conditions, force majeure and other events out of our control; and

·cost overruns, due to any one or more of the foregoing factors.

Accordingly, some of the solar power projects in our pipeline may not be completed or even proceed to construction. If a number of solar power projects are not completed, we may not benefit from the feed-in-tariffs, or FITs, our solar power projects are otherwise entitled to, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

6

In addition, if we are unable to complete the development of a solar power project or we fail to meet any agreed upon system-level capacity or energy output guarantees or warranties or other contract terms, or our projects cause grid interference or other damage, we may be subject to significant damages, penalties and other obligations relating to the project, including obligations to repair, replace or supplement materials for the project.

Occasionally, we may enter into fixed-price EPC agreements in which we act as the general contractor for our customers in connection with the installation of their solar power systems. All essential costs are estimated at the time of entering into the EPC agreement for a particular project or project portfolio, and these costs are reflected in the overall fixed price that we charge our customers for the project. These cost estimates are preliminary and may or may not be covered by contracts between us and the subcontractors, suppliers and other parties involved in the project. In addition, we require qualified, licensed subcontractors to install most of our solar power systems. Shortages of skilled labor could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase our costs. Should miscalculations in planning a project occur, including those due to unexpected increases in commodity prices or labor costs, or delays in execution occur and we are unable to increase the EPC sales price commensurately, we may not achieve our expected margins or our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Expansion of the pipeline of our solar power project business exposes us to a number of risks and uncertainties.

 

As a greater proportion of our net revenue may berevenues is derived from our solar power project business, we will be increasingly exposed to the risks associated with solar power projects. Further, our future success largely depends on our ability to expand our solar power project pipeline. The risks and uncertainties associated with our solar power project business and our ability to expand our solar power project pipeline include:

 

·the need to raise funds to develop greenfield or purchase late-stage solar power projects, which we may be unable to obtain on commercially reasonable terms or at all;

 

·the uncertainty of being able to sell the projects or secure purchasers in a timely manner, in which case we may need to operate such projects for an extended period of time;

·the uncertainty of being able to receive full payment for the sold projects upon completion or receive payment in a timely manner;

 

·failure to cause the joint ventureof our business partners with which we work together under certain cooperation agreements to operate in a way satisfactory to us or any disputedisputes with our joint venturebusiness partners if we adopt a joint venture structure to develop projects or enter into new geographic markets;

 

·delays and cost overruns as a result of a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including delays in regulatory approvals, construction, grid-connection and customer acceptance testing;

 

·delays or denial of required approvals, permits or licenses by relevant government authorities in connection with the construction, grid-connection and operation of solar power projects;

 

·failure to negotiate favorable payment terms with components and services suppliers;

 

·unforeseeable engineering problems, construction or other unexpected delays and contractor performance shortfalls;

 

·labor, components and materials supply delays, shortages or disruptions, or work stoppages;

 

·failure to grid connection and dispatch agreements, execute power purchase agreements or other arrangements that are commercially acceptable to us;

 

·diversion of significant management attention and other resources; and

 

·failure to execute our project pipeline expansion plan effectively.effectively; and

7

·changes in government regulations and policies.

 

If we are unable to successfully expand our solar power project business, and in particular, our solar power project pipeline, we may be unable to expand our business, maintain our competitive position, improve our profitability and generate the cash flows we have currently forecasted.

 

FailureOur development activities may be subject to increase our manufacturing capacitycost overruns or output and expand our module sales business as planneddelays, which may result in reduction or forfeiture of FIT payments or would materially and adversely affect our overall businessfinancial results and competitiveness. Volatility in and large decreaseresults of pricesoperations

Development of our solar power productsprojects may cause significant fluctuations or declines in our revenue.

Mostbe adversely affected by circumstances outside of our wafer sales, particularly salescontrol, including inclement weather, a failure to receive regulatory approvals on schedule or third-party delays in providing solar modules, inverters or other materials. Obtaining full permits for our major customers, are made under purchase orders based onsolar power projects is time consuming and we may not be able to meet our expected timetable for obtaining full permits for our solar power projects in the spot market rates. Whilepipeline. In addition, from time to time, we are subjectmay need to certain long-term sales contracts, the pricing termsengage external EPC contractors for our solar power projects and volumes under such contracts canwe may not be subjectable to renegotiationsnegotiate with satisfactory EPC agreements. Changes in situations where there is substantial market volatility. We also have short-term sales contractsproject plans or designs, or defective or late execution may increase our costs and long-term framework contracts that provide for variable pricing and volume terms with our customers. Therefore, volatility or significant decreasescause delays. Increases in the prices of solar power products have subjectedand balance-of-system components may increase procurement costs. Labor shortages, work stoppages or labor disputes could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase our costs. In addition, delays in obtaining, our inability to obtain or a lack of proper construction permits or post-construction approvals could delay or prevent us and may subject us, to major fluctuations or declines in our revenue under our renegotiated long-term contracts, short-terms sales contracts and long-term framework contracts.

Volatility in polysilicon prices and changes in supply and demand for solar power products may give rise to disputes between us and our suppliers or customers, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Polysilicon is an essential raw material in the productionfrom construction of our solar power products. We currently produce 6,000 metric tonsprojects, commencing operation and connecting to the relevant grid.

Moreover, we rely on our related parties, as well as a limited number of polysilicon internally, but it is not sufficientthird-party suppliers, for certain components and equipment used in the construction of our solar power projects, such as solar modules. To the extent the processes that our suppliers use to manufacture components are proprietary, we may be unable to obtain comparable components from alternative suppliers. Any failure of a supplier to supply components and equipment in a timely manner, or at all, or to supply components and equipment that meet our total demand. quality, quantity and cost requirements, could impair our ability to install solar power projects or may increase our costs.

In 2015,addition, we typically utilize and rely on third-party contractors to construct and install our solar power projects. If our contractors do not satisfy their obligations or do not perform work that meets our quality standards or if there is a shortage of third-party contractors or if there are labor strikes that interfere with the ability of our employees or contractors to complete their work on time or within budget, we could experience significant delays or cost overruns.

We may not be able to recover any of these losses in connection with construction cost overruns or delays. In addition, if we are unable to connect a solar power project to the power grid on schedule, we may experience lower FIT, as FIT regimes generally ratchet down the FIT awarded to solar power projects that connect later to the power grid. In addition, in certain cases of delay, we might not be able to obtain any FIT or PPA at all, as certain PPAs require that we connect to the transmission grid by a certain date. If the solar power project is significantly delayed, we may forfeit the PPA and we may only be able to obtain reduced FIT payments or may even become ineligible for FIT payments at all. A reduction or forfeiture of FIT payments or would materially and adversely affect the financial results and results of operations for that solar power project.

We may not be able to develop or acquire additional attractive solar power projects to grow our IPP portfolio.

Our current business strategy includes plans to further grow the solar power project portfolio for our IPP business, or IPP portfolio, and own and operate some of the solar power projects we develop. To develop a solar power project, we are required to enter into investment agreements, development agreements, interconnection agreements and/or other contractual agreements with the local authorities and obtain relevant permits, licenses and approvals. Whether or not we can secure an investment agreement is subject to the discretion of government bodies and may be influenced by factors beyond our control, such as market conditions and the allocated solar power project quota based on which the agreement can be entered into or government incentive programs. Our competitors may have greater financial resources, more effective or established localized business presence or greater willingness or ability to operate with little or no operating margins for sustained periods of time. It is difficult to predict whether and when we will be awarded a new solar power projects. Any increase in competition or reduction in our competitive capabilities could have a significant adverse impact on our market share and on the margins we generate from our solar power projects.

8

If we cannot complete the agreement on schedule, or at all, the PPA/FIT price may be reduced, our reputation may be damaged and it may increase the difficulty of polysilicon declined from $21 per kilogram to $14 per kilogram. If prices risepursuing projects. In addition, in any event the government bodies terminate the agreement with us, we will have limited recourse. Although the government bodies have historically not terminated the agreements with us, there is no assurance that they would not do so in the future,future.

If we cannot secure the opportunities to develop new solar power projects, our business, financial position and financial conditions will incur higher costs relatingbe materially adversely affected.

Other difficulties executing this business strategy, particularly in new jurisdictions we may enter, include:

·accurately prioritizing geographic markets for entry, including estimates on addressable market demand;

·obtaining construction, environmental and other permits and approvals;

·securing land, rooftop or other site control;

·managing local operational, capital investment or components sourcing regulatory requirements;

·connecting to the power grid on schedule and within budget;

·connecting to the power grid if there is insufficient grid capacity;

·identifying, attracting and retaining qualified development specialists, technical engineering specialists and other personnel;

·managing any acquired assets or assets held under affiliates;

·securing cost-competitive financing on attractive terms;

·operating and maintaining solar power projects to maintain the power output and system performance; and

·collecting FIT payments and other economic incentives as expected.

We face a number of risks involving PPAs and project-level financing arrangements, including failure or delay in entering into PPAs, defaults by counterparties and contingent contractual terms such as price adjustment, termination, buy-out, acceleration or other clauses, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may not be able to enter into PPAs for our solar power projects due to intense competition, increased supply of electricity from other sources, reduction in retail electricity price, changes in government policies or other factors. There may be limited pool of potential purchasers in some jurisdictions for electricity generated by our solar power plants due to regulatory policies. The willingness of purchasers to purchase electricity from an IPP like us may be based on a number of factors and not solely on pricing and surety of supply. If we cannot enter into PPAs on terms favorable to us, or at all, it would negatively impact our revenue and our decisions regarding the external purchasedevelopment of polysilicon, whichadditional power plants. We may experience delays in entering into PPAs for some of our solar power projects or may not be able to replace an expiring PPA with a contract on equivalent terms and conditions, or otherwise at prices that permit operation of the related facility on a profitable basis. Any delay in entering into PPAs may adversely affect our overall profitability. Onability to enjoy the contrary, if the actual prices of polysilicon and our finished products are less favorable than our forecast, we may be exposed to inventory write-downs on a net realizable value basis, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, we have entered into long-term polysilicon purchase agreements with international suppliers. In the past, the long-term polysilicon purchase agreements we entered into with international suppliers did not provide for price adjustments in the event of fluctuations in the market price of polysilicon. In 2012, we renegotiated with these suppliers for each purchase order during the year ended December 31, 2012 and successfully changed the terms to be close to the market price.cash flows generated by such projects. If we are unable to makereplace an expiring PPA with an acceptable new PPA, the affected site may temporarily or permanently cease operations, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

9

Substantially all of the electricity generated by our solar power projects will be sold under long-term PPAs with government end users and a few to licensed suppliers or commercial and industrial users. We expect our future projects will also have long-term public PPAs or similar offtake arrangements such as tariff programs but the portion under licensed suppliers or commercial and industrial users may increase due to our focus in DG projects, and also due to the falling system cost which makes solar energy more accessible to non-State Grid users such as commercial and industrial users. If, for any reason, any of the purchasers of power under these contracts are unable or unwilling to fulfill their related contractual obligations or if they refuse to accept delivery of power delivered thereunder or if they otherwise terminate such agreements prior to the expiration thereof, our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Further, to the extent any of our power purchasers are, or are controlled by, governmental entities, our facilities may be subject to legislative or other political action that may impair their contractual performance or contain contractual remedies that do not provide adequate compensation in the event a counterparty defaults.

Some of our PPAs are subject to price adjustments over time or subject to inflation. If the price under any of our PPAs is reduced below a level that makes a project economically viable, our financial conditions, cash flow and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Further, some of our long-term PPAs do not include inflation-based price increase or other price adjustment clauses. Certain of the PPAs for our projects and those for projects that we have acquired and may acquire in the future contain or may contain provisions that allow the offtake purchaser to terminate or buy out the project or require us to pay liquidated damages upon the occurrence of certain events. If these provisions are exercised, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

In additional, certain of the project-level financing arrangements for projects allow, and certain of the projects that we may incur higher raw material costs than market pricesacquire in the future may allow, the lenders or our competitors whoinvestors to accelerate the repayment of the financing arrangement in the event that a PPA is terminated or if certain operating thresholds or performance measures are not bound by long-term supply contracts for fixed prices, whichachieved within specified time periods if we does not timely notify the lenders and investors such event and fail to provide additional guarantee. Certain of our PPAs and project-level financing arrangements include, and in turnthe future may include, provisions that would permit the counterparty to terminate the contract or accelerate maturity in the event we own, directly or indirectly, less than 50% of the combined voting power or, in some cases, if we cease to be the majority owner, directly or indirectly, of the applicable project subsidiary. The termination of any of our PPAs or the acceleration of the maturity of any of our financing arrangements as a result of a change-in-control event could have a material adverse effect on our competitiveness,financial condition, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore,cash flows.

We may not be able to identify suitable sites and obtain related access and use right to expand our IPP business

Solar power projects require solar and geological conditions that can only be found in lighta limited number of geographic areas.

Our solar power projects in overseas markets are primarily ground-mounted DG projects, with a few small-scale utility-scale projects and community solar gardens. Our solar power projects in China are primarily the volatilityrooftop DG projects. There is intense competition for a limited number of polysilicon prices and changes in supply and demandproject sites appropriate for solar power products,projects. As the solar power project market continues to evolve, the number of attractive project sites available has decreased and will continue to decrease.

Even if we sign investment or development agreements, we may not be able to find and secure the use rights to suitable project sites for the relevant projects. We generally obtain land use rights for our suppliers and customers may become involved in negotiationsground-mounted projects through land use right granting or disputes with us regarding terms and conditions ofassignment by the agreementsgovernment, or arrangements with them, including the quantity and price of the products to be delivered under existing agreements or arrangements. Any negotiation or litigation arising out of these disputes could distract managementleasing from the day-to-day operation ofland use right owners; and obtain the access and use rights for our business, subject usrooftop DG projects through leasing from the roof top owners. Our rights to potentially significant legal expenses, result in the forfeiture of our deposits under long-term polysilicon contracts and interrupt the sourcing of our polysilicon or the sales ofproperties used for our solar power products, which could materiallyprojects may be challenged by property owners or other third parties, in case of any disputes over the ownership or lease of the properties. It is critical to guarantee and adversely affectmaintain our businessland use right on the land parcel and access and use right on the roof top during the life cycle of solar power projects. In case the relevant lease agreement were determined null and void by the competent authorities or our land use right and access and use right on roof top were recouped by the government, our solar power projects may be forced to cease operation and our results of operations.operation, financial condition will be materially adversely affected.


10

Volatility

We require flat land parcels for our small-scale solar power projects, including ground-mounted DG projects, small-scale utility projects and community solar gardens. Also, it is crucial to have a land parcel close to the grid connection point for our ground-mounted projects for interconnection to the power grid and in order to control the pricescost for the construction of transmission line and any failureavoid the electricity transmission loss. However, it is increasingly difficult to secure flat land parcels close to the supply of,transmission line. Once we have identified a suitable site, our ability to obtain requisite land use rights or access and use rights to the roof top is subject to growing competition from other raw materialssolar energy producers that may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In additionbetter access to polysilicon, we also depend on the supply of other raw materials such as steel and slurry for our production activities. Given our focus on cost reductions in a market where our products are subject to industry-wide downward pricing pressure, we may be outbid by purchasers in other industrieslocal government support, financial or other players in the same industry forresources to locate and obtain rights of such raw materials.sites. Our competitors may impede our development efforts by acquiring control of all or a portion of a solar site we seek to develop. If we arewere unable to secure the supply of such raw materials at reasonable costs, we may experience interruptionsfind or obtain use rights for suitable solar power project sites, our ability to our production or otherwise incur significant costs that could havedevelop new solar power projects on a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Moreover, we are subject to fluctuations in the prices of other raw materials. If we are unable to manage such risks, we may incur substantial costs when the prices of such raw materials increase significantly or experience write-downs in our inventory when their prices decline,timely basis might be harmed, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We have been strictly check the land ownership and use and access rights to avoid agricultural land, wetland or any land which require rezoning. However, we cannot assure you that we will not acquire land with the understanding that such land may be exposed to intellectual property infringementrezoned for solar power project development in the future. Rezoning may take longer than expected or misappropriation claims by third parties which, if determinedmay not been possible. Any future rezoning efforts may materially and adversely to us, could cause us to pay significant damage awards.impact our business and results of operation.

 

Our success depends largelylegal rights to certain real properties used for our solar power projects are subject to third party rights and may be challenged by property owners or third parties.

Our rights to the properties used for our solar power projects may be challenged by property owners and other third parties, subject to other third-party rights such as right of passage and right to place cables and other equipment on the properties, which may result in certain interferences with our abilityuse of the properties. Our rights to the properties used for our solar power projects may be challenged by property owners and other third parties for various other reasons as well. For example, we may not have the exclusive right to use and developa given site. Any such challenge, if successful, could impair the development or operations of our technology and know-how without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The validity and scope of claims relating to solar power technology patents involve complex scientific, legal and factual questions and analysis and, therefore,projects on such properties. We may also be highly uncertain. subject to the risk of potential disputes with property owners or third parties who otherwise have rights to or interests in the properties used for our solar power projects. Such disputes, whether resolved in our favor or not, may divert management’s attention, harm our reputation or otherwise disrupt our business.

We may be subject to litigation involving claimsunforeseen costs, liabilities or obligations when operating and maintaining solar power projects.

We operate and maintain the solar power projects in our IPP portfolio. In addition to the operations and maintenance, or O&M, services which our in-house O&M team provides to our developed solar power projects in China, we also enter into separate contractual agreements to operate and maintain substantially all of patent infringementthe solar power projects operated by us overseas. Pursuant to these agreements, we generally perform scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and operating and other asset management services and we subcontract certain O&M services, including security and repair, to third-parties, who may not perform their services adequately.

If we or violationour third-party contractors fail to properly operate and maintain the solar power projects, the solar power projects may experience decreased performance, reduced useful life or shut downs. Through changes in our own operation or in local conditions, the costs of intellectual property rights of third parties. For example,operating the project may increase, including costs related to labor, equipment, we design may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties. The defenseinsurance and assertion of intellectual property suits, patent opposition proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings can be both costly and time-consuming and may significantly divert the efforts and resources of our technical and management personnel. An adverse determinationtaxes. If they are careless or negligent, resulting in any such litigation or proceedings against us could subject us to significant liabilitiesdamage to third parties, including requiring uswe may become liable for the consequences of any resulting damage. We may also experience equipment malfunction or failure, leading to seek licenses from third parties, to pay ongoing royaltiesunexpected maintenance needs, unplanned outages or to pay monetary and punitive damagesother operational issues. In addition, inconsistencies in the quality of solar panels, solar modules, balance-of-system components or subjecting us to injunctions that prohibitmaintenance services for our solar power projects may affect the manufacture and salesystem efficiency of our productssolar power projects. We may also encounter difficulties selling electricity to the power grid due to failures in infrastructure or transmission systems. To the useextent that any of the foregoing affects our equipment. Protracted litigation could also resultability to sell electricity to the power grid, or we incur increased costs in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their purchase or use of our products until resolution of such litigation, which could result in lossesrelation to operating and adversely affect our results of operations and reputation.

If our internal control system fails to detect, prevent or remedy risks in our business as intended or if there is any misconduct by our employees in violation of our policies or applicable laws and regulations,maintaining solar power projects, our business, financial condition and results of operationsoperation could be materially and adversely affected,affected.

11

The delay between making significant upfront investments in our solar power projects and receiving revenue could materially and adversely affect our reputationliquidity, business and results of operations.

There are generally many months or even years between our initial significant upfront investments in developing permits to develop solar power projects we expect to own and operate and when we commence to receive revenue from the sale of electricity generated by such solar power projects after connecting on grid. Such investments include, without limitation, legal, accounting and other third-party fees, costs associated with feasibility study, payments for land rights, government permits, large transmission and PPA deposits or other payments, which may be non-refundable. Furthermore, we historically relied on our own equity contribution, bank loans, capital market financing and third party financing to pay for costs and expenses incurred during project development, especially to third parties for solar modules and balance-of-system components and EPC and O&M services. Solar power projects typically generate revenue only after becoming commercially operational and starting to sell electricity. There may be an especially long delay from initial land and interconnection assessments to projects becoming late-stage, especially when we obtain permits directly from regulators and site control rights directly from prior rights holders under our primary permit development model. Between our initial investments in the development of permits for solar power projects and their connection to the transmission grid, there may be adverse developments to such solar power projects. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain all of the permits as anticipated, permits that were obtained may expire or become ineffective or we may not be able to obtain financing as anticipated. In addition, the timing gap between our upfront investments and actual generation of revenue, or any added delay in between due to unforeseen events, could be severely damaged.put strains on our liquidity and resources, and materially and adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.

Our ability to transmit and sell the electricity generated from the solar power projects operated by us relies on the grid connection, dispatch agreements, PPAs and other contractual agreements.

 

We maintainsell electricity generated from our operated solar power projects mainly in China. Before developing a solar power project for our IPP business, we have to obtain the relevant local governmental grid company’s preliminary consent on our grid connection application and the final approval on the grid connection plan in order to connect our solar power projects to their power grids.

In China, we can sell the electricity in gross metering or net metering. Under gross metering, electricity is sold to The State Grid Corporation of China, or the State Grid, which is an internal control system consistingenterprise which constructs and operates power grids and is a pilot state holding company approved by the State Council of components such as an internal control department, a whistleblower hotlineChina to carry out state-authorized investment. Under the net metering, we first sell the electricity to non-State Grid power purchasers and other channels for internal reporting, and policies and procedures that are designedthe remaining unpurchased electricity to monitor and control potential risk areas relevantthe State Grid. Before we can supply the electricity to our business operations. However, duepower purchasers, we are required to enter into the inherent limitationsgrid connection and dispatch agreements with the grid providers and energy management contracts, or EMCs, including PPAs with the power purchasers. Grid connection and dispatch agreements generally have terms of 1 to 5 years and are, in practice, subject to renewal by the designparties when original terms expire. The EMCs, which provide the terms and implementationpricing of any internal control system,the sales and include the PPAs, are in 20 years and are subject to renewal by the parties when original terms expire. If we cannot assure you that our internal control system willare unable to renew the agreements upon expiration, we may not be able to identify, preventreplace them with agreements with equivalent terms and remedyconditions, or at all, risks arising from our business activities as intended or otherwise effectively be implemented, monitoredwe may experience significant delays or managed by us. Moreover,costs related to securing replacements. If we cannot guarantee all of our employees will act in complianceare unable to agree with our employee policiesthe grid providers on a new grid connection and be applicable laws and regulations. Any misconduct or violation by our employees could adversely affect our business and reputation or lead to regulatory sanctions being imposed against us or causing us to incur litigation costs.


In addition, as we continue to transformdispatch agreements, the focus of our business from solar wafer manufacturing to both solar wafer and module manufacturing, and to further expand our product lines and breadth of operations globally, our business operations will become more complex. Starting from early 2014, we began to expand our operations into the broader energy efficient products and services business and into downstreamaffected solar power projects. Although we will continue to reassess and seek ways to improve upon our internal control system as necessary, the transformation and expansion of our businessproject may temporarily or permanently cease operations, may give rise to additional internal control risks that are currently unknown to us, despite any efforts to anticipate such risks.

If our internal control system fails to detect risks in our business as intended or to be effectively implemented, monitored and managed, or if we fail to adopt new internal control procedures commensurate with our expanding business operations, or if our employees fail to comply with our policies and applicable laws and regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, and our reputation could be severely damaged.

Cyber security risks and breaches could adversely affect our business and disrupt our operations.

We are subject to cyber security risks and may incur costs to minimize those risks. Cyber security breaches, such as unauthorized access, accidents, employee error or malfeasance, computer viruses, computer hackings or other disruptions, could compromise the security of our data and infrastructure, thereby exposing such information to unauthorized access by third parties. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage systems, change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to remedy, protect against or alleviate these and related problems, and we may not be able to remedy these problemsoperate the project beyond the initial term of the EMCs and PPAs. See also “⸺We face a number of risks involving PPAs and project-level financing arrangements, including failure or delay in entering into PPAs, defaults by counterparties and contingent contractual terms such as price adjustment, termination, buy-out, acceleration or other clauses, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, if, for any reason, the grid providers are unable or unwilling to fulfill their related contractual obligations or if they refuse to accept delivery of electricity delivered thereunder or otherwise terminate such agreements prior to the expiration thereof, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be materially adversely affected.

If we cannot produce agreed electricity for reasons solely attributed to us, the agreed PPA/FIT prices may be reduced, results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In China, all solar projects approved by the National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, are eligible to receive an attractive fixed FIT for 20 years in principle and we expect our solar power projects to be long-term contracted assets. Under gross metering, we receive a timely manner,total amount of FIT amount, which comprise an agreed electricity sales price from the State Grid and the government subsidies, for 20 years. Under net metering, we receive subsidies from the government and an agreed negotiated electricity sales price from the power purchasers. However, if we cannot produce electricity normally for a number of days for reasons solely attributed to us, the agreed PPA/FIT prices may be reduced and results of operations and cash flow could be materially adversely affected.

12

If the power grid to which one or more of our solar power projects is connected becomes partially or fully inoperable due to maintenance or unexpected interruptions, the transmission of electricity may be affected and results of operations and cash flow could be materially adversely affected.

If the power grid to which one or more of our solar power projects is connected becomes partially or fully inoperable due to maintenance or unexpected interruptions, the affected project will not be able to transmit electricity to the power grid during that time. We expect power grids to be inoperable for a few days per year due to regular maintenance work. The grid providers will not usually compensate us for lost income due to down time. Although none of the power grids that we have been connected to have been rendered inoperable for significant periods of time, there is no assurance that the power grids will continue to function without any issues.

Our growth prospects and future profitability depend to a significant extent on global liquidity and the availability of additional funding options with acceptable terms.

We require a significant amount of cash to fund the development, installation and construction of our projects and the operation of our solar power projects. We may also require additional cash due to changing business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue in order to remain competitive. Historically, we primarily obtained development loans, construction loans, project financing and capital market financing from financial institutions, fund investors globally, as well as financing lease companies in China. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in locating additional suitable sources of financing in the time periods required or at all.all, or on terms or at costs that we find attractive or acceptable. Failure to manage discretionary spending and raise additional capital or debt financing as required may adversely impact our ability to achieve our intended business objectives.

Our ability to obtain external financing is subject to a number of uncertainties, including:

·our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows;

·the general condition of global equity and debt capital markets;

·regulatory and government support in the form of tax credits, rebates, FIT price support schemes and other incentives;

·the continued confidence of banks and other financial institutions in our company and the solar industry;

·economic, political and other conditions in the jurisdictions where we operate; and

·our ability to comply with any financial covenants under the debt financing.

In addition, rising interest rates could adversely impact our ability to secure financing on favorable terms and our cost of capital. Any security breachesadditional equity financing may be dilutive to our shareholders and any debt financing may require restrictive covenants. We may not be able to obtain project financing or refinance our borrowings as they mature, or if the financing is available, the terms may not be acceptable to us. In the event that occur could disruptwe are unable to obtain extensions of these borrowings or sufficient alternative financing at reasonable terms, we may not be able to repay such borrowings in full or at all when due, or fully execute our business plan. If we were to default on the repayment of these borrowings, we would not be able to continue our operations increase our security costs, or expose us toas a going concern. Moreover, future turbulence in global economic conditions and the potential losses due to data corruption or information leakage, which couldimpact on the liquidity of financial institutions may have a materialan adverse effect on our business.ability to fund our operations and future expansion through borrowings or our ability to borrow on terms that we believe to be reasonable, or at all. Our ability to fund our operations, develop, construct and operate solar power projects or otherwise respond to competitive pressures could be significantly impaired and we may be unable to fully execute our business plan. Our operations, results of operations and growth prospects may also be materially and adversely affected if the global economic conditions worsen or do not improve.

13

Volatility or large decrease in the prices of solar power project may cause significant fluctuations or declines in our revenue.

The prices of special purpose vehicles which hold the ownership of our solar power projects, or project SPVs, and solar power projects are primarily based on the electricity revenue the projects can generate and the rate of returns. The electricity price may vary. See “⸺Decreases in the FIT price, public utility price or market discount rate could harm our revenue.” Investors may compare the rate of returns generated from the solar power projects with the rate of returns in the financing or investment markets. Any significant volatility or decreases in the electricity price or rate of return may decrease the prices of solar power projects which may subject us to major fluctuations or declines in our revenue.

Decreases in the FIT price, public utility price or market discount rate could harm our revenue.

Revenues generated from our IPP business are primarily from China. Under gross metering, the revenue we can receive are fixed at the FIT price which is set by the government. Under net metering, the prices we sell the electricity to the non-State Grid power purchasers are mainly at a market discount rate of the public utility rate. The market price of electricity can be subject to significant fluctuations and can be affected by drivers such as the cost of traditional fossil fuels used for electricity generation, the discovery of new fossil fuel sources, additional electricity generation capacity, additional electric transmission and distribution lines, technological or regulatory changes, increased energy conservation or for a number of other reasons. Any decrease in the FIT price, market discount rate or the public utility rate may negatively affect our results of operations.

EPC is subject to risks associated with fluctuations in the prices of solar modules and balance-of-system components or fluctuations in the costs of design, construction and labor.

EPC is part of the process during the solar power projects development and construction. We may engage our in-house EPC team or engage external experienced and qualified EPC contractors to conduct and monitor the EPC process. Despite that, it is the market practice for us, as the developer, to procure the key components, such as solar modules and balance-of-system components. Design, construction, labor and installation costs incurred by our in-house EPC team or external EPC contracts may also vary. Any increase in the prices of solar modules or balance-of-system components or fluctuations in design, construction, labor and installation costs may increase our procurement cost for the key components or costs to engage external contractors and hence may materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The reduction, modification, delay or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives for on-grid solar power applications could cause demand formay reduce the profitability of our products to decline.business and materially adversely affect our business.

 

Our solar wafers sold to customers are subsequently made into modules and assembled in solar power systems, which are either connected to the utility grid and generate electricity to feed into the grid or installed to supply electricity to businesses and residents. We also sell solar modules directly to customers. We believe that the near-term growth of the market for on-grid applications continues to depend on the availability and size of government subsidies and economic incentives.incentives which can be influenced by various factors, such as national subsidy police and the local desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price. If the reduction or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives are not implemented prudently, such reduction or elimination may adversely affect the growth of this market or result in increased price competition, either of which could cause our revenues to decline.

 

When upfront system costs are factored into the cost of electricity generation, the cost of solar power substantially exceeds the cost of power generated from conventional means in many markets. As a result, national and local governmental bodies in many countries most notably in Germany, China, Spain, Italy, the United States, Japan, Australia, Bulgaria and Romania, have provided subsidies and economic incentives in the form of feed-in tariffs,FITs, rebates, tax credits and other incentives to end-users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of solar power products to promote the use of solar power and to reduce dependence on other forms of energy.

 

However, as the solar power industry continues to develop, these government subsidies and economic incentives have been reduced and could continue to be reduced or be eliminated altogether. For example, reductions in 2011, a decreaseFIT programs in paymentGermany have continued since 2014 and the government in China has issued various policies to solar power producers, in the form of feed-in tariffs and other reimbursements and a reduction in available financing caused a decrease in the growth in a number ofcontrol FIT for on-grid solar power projects in the European markets. Certain reductions in feed-in-tariff programs have continued in 2012 and 2013 across Europe, including Germany, Italy, Spain, Romania and the Czech Republic. The feed-in-tariff reduction continued in 2014 in Germany. In China, the State Council issued the Several Opinions of the State Council on Promoting the Healthy Development of the Photovoltaic Industry on July 4, 2014, which requires relevant authorities to reasonably adjust and reduce the feed-in tariff for on-grid PV projects. The execution period of feed-in tariffs for PV projects is set at 20 years in principle. According to the Notice re Leveraging the Price to Promote the Healthy Development of the Photovoltaic Industry issued by the Department of Price of the PRC National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, on August 26, 2013, since September 1, 2013, the feed-in-tariff in China has been reduced to a range of RMB0.90 per kilowatt hour, or kwh, to RMB1.00/kwh depending on the project location, from RMB1.15/kwh for projects approved prior to July 1, 2011 or from RMB1.00/kwh for projects approved after July 1, 2011. On December 22, 2015, the NDRC issued the Notice on Improving the Feed-in Tariff Policies for Onshore Wind Power/Photovoltaic Power Generation, which provides the benchmarking feed-in tariff of photovoltaic power generation for the year of 2016. NDRC continued to adopt the measures that divided the country into three solar resources districts, of which the feed-in tariffs are RMB0.80/kwh, RMB0.88/kwh and RMB0.98/kwh.2014. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—China⸻Renewable Energy Law and Other Government Directives.”

14

Although the solar power industry is currently moving towards the economies of scale necessary for solar power to become cost-effective in a non-subsidized market, theany reduction, modification, delay or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives for on-grid solar power applications could result in decreased demand for our products and cause our revenues to decline. Although, under the most recently proposed five-year plan, we expect China to become one of the largest markets for solar power products in 2015 and beyond, and although we have seen substantial growth in markets such as the United States, Japan, and Australia, Europe continues to be an important market. As European governments continue to decrease their subsidies, Chinese solar power products may continue to experience excess capacity, which could impact the demand and pricing of our solar power products,projects, which could materially and adversely impact our revenues and profitability.


Industry trends, in particular, limited interconnection capacity, will have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.

The solar industry is expected to continue to be highly competitive due to more new entrants to the solar project market and upstream solar manufacturing players moving to the downstream project business. Increasing solar generation capacity may result in continued interconnection capacity scarcity. If the industry continue to suffer from scarcity in interconnection capacity resulting in slowed market growth and potential regulatory curtailments, our business and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our future success substantially depends on our ability to closely monitor and accurately predict market demand. This exposes us to a number of risks and uncertainties.

We intend to closely matching our solar power projects and electricity to the market demand for our products. Any failure to accurately predict market demand may result in our below-supply or oversupply of our solar power projects and electricity required to meet the market demand. Our ability to achieve a balance is subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including:

·the ability to maintain existing customer relationships, attract new customers and expand our market share;

·the ability to maintain a financially healthy level of liquidity, and to manage our liquidity if we are unable to obtain additional funds and/or refinance existing debt on commercially viable terms or at all;

·the occurrence of construction delays and cost overruns;

·the occurrence of industrial disturbances, which are more likely to arise when we suffer overcapacity and our workers are not fully employed, or when our suppliers are not paid in a timely fashion;

·the ability to install and test the solar system according to the agreed time schedule;

·the delay or denial of required approvals by relevant government authorities; and

·any significant diversion of management attention.

If we are unable to successfully respond to market demand, or if we fail to resolve any of the risks and uncertainties, we may be unable to expand our business, maintain our profitability and stay competitive. Moreover, even if we are able to manage our growth, we may be unable to secure sufficient purchase orders, which could adversely affect our business and operations.

Turbulence in global financial markets and economies may adversely affect the solar industry, the demand for solar powerproject products, and our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

 

Demand for solar powerproject products is influenced by macroeconomic factors, such as global economic conditions, the supply and the prices of other energy products, such as oil, coal and natural gas, as well as government regulations and policies concerning the electricpublic utility industry. A decrease in prices of fossil fuels, for example, could reduce demand for alternative forms of energy, such as solar power. We are also affected by the solar market and industry trends. In 2011, paymentsSee “Item 3. Key Information⸺D. Risk Factors⸺Risks Related to Our Business⸺We may be adversely affected by volatile solar power producers decreased as governmentsmarket and industry conditions; in Europe, under pressure to reduce sovereign debt levels, reduced subsidies such as feed-in tariffs, which tariffs require public utility companies to pay higherparticular, the demand and prices for our solar power than for powerprojects and electricity generated through conventional means. In 2012, continued instability in the European financial markets coupled with continued oversupply in the solar market contributed to difficult market conditions forby our solar power producers. In 2013, the solar sector recovered as solar product manufacturers adopted a more rational approach, a series of industry restructuring and integration took place and market demand increased. The solar sector continued to stabilize with increased global demand in 2014 and 2015 so that some solar manufactures restarted their plans to expand their capacity. However these market conditionsprojects may not last in the long-run if potentially increased manufacturing capacity and insufficient rationalization of capacity drive the market into continued oversupply,decline, which may adversely affect the prices of solar power products.reduce our revenues and profitability.”

15

 

There may still be substantial uncertainties in the global credit and lending environment. If the demand for solar power productsprojects deteriorates due to these macroeconomic factors or solar market and industry trends, our liquidity and financial condition, including our ability to refinance maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, and the liquidity and financial condition of our customers may be adversely affected. This would delay and lengthen our cash collection cycles and negatively impact our operating results. Additionally, our shareADS price may decrease if investors have concerns that our business, financial condition and results of operations will be negatively impacted by a global economic downturn.

We operatemay be adversely affected by volatile solar power market and industry conditions; in particular, the demand and prices for our solar power projects and electricity generated by our solar power projects may decline, which may reduce our revenues and profitability.

Our business is affected by conditions in the solar project market and industry. In December 2016 and December 2017, the NDRC announced the reduction in FITs for utility-scale solar plants. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is also expected to have less favorable policies for industries engaged in clean energy. As a result, many solar power project developers and solar system installers, like us, were adversely affected and the financial condition weakened. In addition, decreases in prices of other energies, such as oil, electricity and wind power, may also negatively affect the demand for solar power projects. The solar industry is also expected to continue to be highly competitive due to more new entrants to the solar project market and manyupstream solar manufacturing players moving to the downstream project business. If the supply of solar projects grows faster than demand, and if governments continue to reduce financial support for the solar industry, impose trade barriers or impose curtailments in the solar industry, demand for our competitors have greater resources than we do, weprojects, as well as our average selling price, could be materially and adversely affected.

If solar power project technology is proven not suitable for widespread adoption, or if demand for solar power projects continues to lag behind their supply, our revenues may not be able to compete successfullydecline and we may lose or be unable to gain market share.achieve or sustain profitability.

 

The solar market is increasingly competitivestill in development and continually evolving, which may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins or lossthe extent of market share by us. Our competitors include integratedacceptance of solar power product manufacturers, specialized solar wafer manufacturers, solar wafer manufacturing divisions of large conglomerates, specialized cellprojects remains uncertain. Historical and module manufacturers, polysilicon suppliers with ingot and wafer manufacturing capacities, integrated module manufacturers, end-market system integrators and solar project developers. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, strongercurrent market positions, larger manufacturing capabilities, greater resources, better brand name recognition and better access to favorably priced silicon raw materials than we do. Some of our competitors have an established track record in large-scale polysilicon manufacturing and they may have an advantage over us in polysilicon feedstock costs. Many of our competitors also have more established distribution networks and larger customer bases. As a result, they may be able to devote greater resources todata on the research, development, promotion and sale of their products or respond more quickly to evolving industry standards and changes in market conditions than we can. The key barriers to enter into our industry at present consist of access to capital resources, advanced manufacturing technologies, a competitive cost structure and skilled personnel. If these barriers disappear or become more easily surmountable, new competitors may successfully enter our industry. If we fail to compete successfully, our business would suffer and we may lose or be unable to gain market share.


One of the competitive factors in solar power industry is conversion efficiency. Conversionare not as readily available as those for established industries where trends can be assessed more reliably from data gathered over a longer period of time. In addition, demand for solar power projects has not developed as fast as many market players have anticipated although the solar industry continues to experience lower costs, improved efficiency and higher electricity output. Many factors may affect the viability of widespread adoption of solar power products is not only determined by the quality of solar wafers but is also dependent on the solar cellprojects technology and module manufacturing processes and technologies. Therefore, solar wafer manufacturers usually assume the conversion efficiency of their solar wafers based on the conversion efficiency of solar cells and modules manufactured by their customers. There is a lack of publicly available information on the conversion efficiency of solar wafers and accordingly, investors may not be able to obtain a comprehensive view of our competitive position vis-à-vis our competitors.

Our future success substantially depends on our ability to closely monitor and accurately predict market demand and to efficiently manage our manufacturing capacity to either meet increased demand or avoid under-utilization of our production facilities due to lower-than-expected demand. This exposes us to a number of risks and uncertainties.

We intend to reach a balance between closely matching our manufacturing capacity and production output to market demand for our products. If we are unable to do so, the low utilization rate of production facilities may result in high production cost, which would adversely affect our profitability. Our failure to accurately predict market demand may also result in our lack of manufacturing capacity required to meet increased demand. Our ability to achieve a balance between the increase in manufacturing capacity and the changes in market demand is subject to significant risks and uncertainties,solar power projects, including:

 

·cost-effectiveness, performance and reliability of solar power projects compared to conventional and other renewable energy sources and products; and the abilityavailability of grid capacity to quickly adjust our manufacturing capacitydispatch power generated from solar power projects;

·success of other alternative energy generation technologies, such as wind power, hydroelectric power and output whilebiomass;

·environmental concerns related to solar power projects and other local permit issues;

·public perceptions of the industry is rapidly evolving;direct and indirect benefits of adopting renewable energy technology;

·fluctuations in economic and market conditions that affect the viability of conventional and other renewable energy sources, such as increases or decreases in the prices of oil and other fossil fuels or decreases in capital expenditures by end-users of solar power projects;

·fluctuations in interest rates, which may affect the effective prices paid for solar power projects by end-users who rely on long-term loans to finance their purchases;

 

·the ability to maintain existing customer relationships, attract new customerscost of capital and expand our market share;availability of credit, loans and other forms of financing for solar power projects;

 

·the abilityavailability of government subsidies and incentives to implement new and upgraded operational and financial systems, procedures and controls to adapt tosupport the strains associated with fast growth and expansion or rapid decrease in demand;development of the solar industry;

 

·regulations and policies governing the abilityelectric utility industry that may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to favorably renegotiate our equipment supply contracts previously entered into for our wafer manufacturing in accordance with changes in our expansion plan;the purchase and use of solar energy; and

16

 

·deregulation of the ability to maintain a financially healthy level of liquidity,electric power industry and to manage our liquidity if we are unable to obtain additional funds and/or refinance existing debt on commercially viable terms or at all;

·the occurrence of construction delays and cost overruns;

·any occurrence of industrial disturbances, which are more likely to arise when we suffer overcapacity and our workers are not fully employed, or when our suppliers are not paid in a timely fashion;

·the ability to install and test new production equipment on a timely basis;

·the delay or denial of required approvals by relevant government authorities; and

·any significant diversion of management attention.broader energy industry.

 

If we are unablesolar power projects technology is proven not viable for widespread adoption or the demand for solar power projects fails to successfully managedevelop sufficiently, our manufacturing capacityrevenues may continue to respond to market demand, or if we fail to resolve any of the riskssuffer and uncertainties described above, we may be unable to expandsustain our business as planned. Therefore, we cannot assure you that we can meet our targeted production costs and consequently stay competitive. Moreover, even if we are able to manage our growth, we may be unable to secure sufficient customer orders, which could adversely affect our business and operations.profitability.


If we are dependent on

Concentration in a limited number of customers wefor the sale of our utility-scale projects may experience us to additional risks and significant fluctuations or declines in our revenues.

 

In the past,our project development, we sold a substantial portionmay sell our utility-scale projects only to utilities companies or grid system operators. Although most of our developed solar wafers topower projects are not utility-scale project, concentration in a limited number of customers. Sincecustomers in this utility-scale project markets may, among others, limit our ability to expose to other purchasers, reduce our power to negotiate the end of 2011, we have increasingly focused our effortspricing terms and sales terms and rely on solar module development and production and have become a module manufacturer and reduced our dependence on a limited number of solar wafer customers. In 2015, our top five wafer customers accounted for approximately 49.5% of our wafer sales and 7.6% of our net revenues and our largest wafer customer accounted for approximately 17.1% of our wafer sales and 2.6% of our net revenues. Our top five module customers accounted for approximately 31.6% of our module sales and 22.7% of our net revenues and our largest module customer accounted for approximately 15.8% of our module sales and 11.3% of our net revenues. We also expanded into downstream solar power projects in early 2014,the payment from the governmental grid companies, which further diversified our business offering.

However, if we fail to further diversify our customer base, including by adding certain new international customers, any one of the following events may cause material fluctuations or declines in our revenues:revenues.

·reduction, delay or cancellation of orders from one or more of our significant customers;

·unilateral change of contractual technological specifications by one or more of our customers;

·failure to reach an agreement with our customers on the pricing terms or sales volumes under various contracts;

·loss of one or more of our significant customers and our failure to identify additional or replacement customers; and

·failure of any of our significant customers to make timely payment for our products.

 

We may not be able to locate third party purchasers for our solar projects on a timely manner, or at all, or we may not be able to timely renew or replace expiring PPAs or other contractual arrangements.

Upon completing solar projects, we either sell them to our related parties or third party purchasers or operate them . For those projects we intend to sell, if we are not able to locate third party purchasers and agree on a purchase and sales contract on terms and conditions favorable to us and in a timely manner, or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

For those projects we intend to operate and generate electricity for sale, if we are not able to timely renew or replace expiring PPAs or other contractual arrangements, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be materially adversely affected. See “⸺Our ability to transmit and sell the electricity generated from the solar power projects operated by us relies on the grid connection, dispatch agreements, PPAs and other contractual agreements.”

Limited number of purchasers of electricity generated by solar energy may expose us and our solar power projects to additional risk.

Transmission and distribution of electricity is either monopolized or highly concentrated in most jurisdictions, there are a limited number of possible purchasers for electricity generated by solar power in a given geographic location, including transmission grid operators, state and investor-owned power companies, public utility districts and cooperatives. As a result, there is a concentrated pool of potential purchasers for electricity generated by our solar power plants and projects, which may restrict our ability to negotiate favorable terms under new PPAs and could impact our ability to find new customers for the electricity generated by our generation facilities should this become necessary. Furthermore, if the financial condition of these grid companies, utilities and/or power purchasers deteriorates or government policies or regulations to which they are currently subject that compel them to source renewable energy supplies change, demand for electricity produced by our plants could be negatively impacted. In addition, provisions in our PPAs or applicable laws may provide for the curtailment of delivery of electricity for various reasons, including preventing damage to transmission systems, system emergencies, force majeure or economic reasons. Such curtailment would reduce revenues to us from PPAs. If we cannot enter into PPAs on terms favorable to us, or at all, or if the purchaser under our PPAs were to exercise its curtailment or other rights to reduce purchases or payments under such arrangements, our revenues and our decisions regarding development of additional projects in the energy segment may be adversely affected.

Local governmental grid companies may reduce the electricity they purchase from us, which may cause our revenues to decline.

Although in some jurisdiction, the local governmental grid companies are obliged to purchase all the electricity generated by us, they may adjust the amount of electricity they purchase from us as result of constraints on grid connection capacity, or curtailment. If this happens, our revenues will be negatively impacted.

17

We may be exposed to credit risks of our customers. If the practice of requiring customers to make advance payments when they place orders with us declines, we will experience increased needs to finance our working capital requirements and are exposed to increased credit risk.

 

We have required our purchasers acquiring our solar power projects or project SPVs to make an advance payment of a certain percentage of their orders, a business practice that has helped us to manage our accounts receivable, prepay our suppliers and reduce the amount of funds that we needed to finance our working capital requirements. This practice of requiring our customers to make advance payments is in line with market trends. Any decline in this practice will pressure us to increase our working capital turnover or obtain additional financing to fund our working capital requirements. In addition, in our project development business, the normal practice is that purchasers make payments of purchase price in stages. In our module salesIPP business, we derive revenues from credit sales, generallywill be paid monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly or half-yearly based on the agreements signed with payment schedules due according to negotiated contracts, which have longer credit periods and more flexible terms when compared to our wafer contracts. As a result of the power purchasers. Any disruptions in the financial markets and other macroeconomic challenges which have affected the global economy may cause our customers mayto experience difficulties in making timely payment to us. Any inability of our customers to pay us timely, or at all, may materially and adversely affect our cash flows and operating results.

 

We incurred and may incur in the future impairment losses on our investments in equity securities.

Since October 2009, we have held a minority equity interest in a polysilicon manufacturer or the investee whose shares were traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, or the TSX. If the fair value of these shares declines below their cost basis and we determine that the decline is permanent, we are required to record an impairment loss for the applicable period. In 2009, due to the rapid decline of the investee’s share price as a result of the difficult operating environment for its core business, such as the rapid decline of polysilicon prices, we recorded impairment losses of $13.4 million. We recorded further impairment losses of $6.2 million in 2011 due to the same reason. The investee filed for bankruptcy protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act of Canada, or CCAA, in January 2012. As a result of the commencement of proceedings under the CCAA, in February 2012, the TSX determined to delist the investee’s shares due to its failure to meet the continued listing requirements of the TSX. As a result, the investment was fully written off in 2011. We may make investments in the future and as a result incur additional expenses as a result of impairment of such investments if their values decline. Any losses incurred could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.


We may not be able to use certain deferred tax assets, which could have a negative impact on our net income.

We recorded approximately $16.2 million as deferred tax assets on our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015. Our ability to use net operating losses to offset earnings is dependent on a number of factors, including our ability to generate taxable income in future years. Should future results of operations or other factors cause us to determine that it is not likely that we will generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize our deferred tax assets, we would then be required to establish a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets. We would increase our income tax expense by the amount of the tax benefit we do not expect to realize. This would negatively impact our net income and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial position.

If we are unable to effectively manage risks related to international sales, our ability to expand our business abroad would be materially and severely impaired.

 

In 2015, approximately 76.6% of our net revenues were generated from customers outside of China, Taiwan and Hong Kong.We expanded our international sales efforts in the last several years by focusing on sales to international solar companies with global distribution capabilities. As we continue to expand our business internationally, we plan to increase sales of our solar-related and other energy efficient products and projects. The marketing, distribution and sales of our solar power and energy efficient products in international marketsbusiness may expose us to a number of risks with respect to our international marketing, distribution and sales activities, including:

 

·fluctuations in currency exchange rates, such as exchange rate volatility between the Euro and the U.S. dollar and the continuing trend of appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar;

 

·increased costs associated with maintaining marketing efforts in various countries;

·the increased cost of understanding local markets and trends and developing and maintaining an effective marketing and distribution presence in various countries;

 

·difficulty and costs relating to compliance with the different commercial, environmental and legal requirements of the overseas markets in which we offer our products;

 

·difficulty in engaging and retaining sales personnel who are knowledgeable about, and can function effectively in, overseas markets;markets and manage the overseas operations;

 

·trade actions initiated in the United States or other jurisdictions, includingdifficulty of managing the European Uniondevelopment, construction and India,sale of our solar power projects on a timely and the resulting anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed on solar imports in those jurisdictions. See also “—Impositionprofitable basis as a result of anti-dumping and countervailing orders in one or more markets may result in additional costs totechnical difficulties, commercial disputes with our customers and disruptionschanges in such markets and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial conditions and prospectus”;regulations, among other factors;

 

·import restrictive proceedings initiatedthe difficulty of providing customer service and support in Chinavarious countries;

·any failure to develop appropriate risk management and any anti-dumping or countervailing duties imposed by Chinese authorities on silicon imports, which could increase the costs of polysiliconinternal control structures tailored to overseas operations;

·differing regulatory and hence our cost of production. See also “—Imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing orders in one or more markets may result in additional costs to our customers and disruptions in such markets and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial conditions and prospectus”;tax regimes across different markets;

 

·trade barriers, such as export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other restrictions and expenses, which could increase the prices of solar modules and therefore raise the costs for our productssolar power projects and make us less competitive in some countries;

·protectionism on the rise, as evidenced by the decision of Great Britain to leave the European Union and the election of Donald Trump as the president of U.S., who has threatened to impose punitive tariffs on goods imported from China;

 

·failure to comply with international sanction laws, including the rules and regulations promulgated by the office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury; and

18

 

·failure to control the increase of our operating expenses without a commensurate increase in our revenues as we hire additional sales and marketing personnel in connection with the expansion of our module sales business.business; and

·any unanticipated changes in prevailing economic conditions and regulatory requirements.

 

If we are unable to effectively manage these risks related to international sales, our ability to expand our business abroad will be materially and severely impaired.

 

We conduct our business globally and are subject to global and local risks related to economic, regulatory, social and political uncertainties.

We conduct our IPP business and/or project development business in a number of countries, such as North America, China, Turkey, Poland, Hungary, Spain, France and emerging markets in Southeast Asia. Our module operationsbusiness is therefore subject to diverse and expansion into downstream solar power projects may causeconstantly changing economic, regulatory, social and political conditions in the jurisdictions in which we operate.

Conducting business in the international markets exposes us to compete with our current customers.a number of risks globally and in each of the jurisdictions where we operate, including, without limitation:

 

·economic and financial conditions, including the stability of credit markets, foreign currency controls and fluctuations;

As of December 31, 2015, through

·the supply and prices of other energy products such as oil, coal and natural gas in the relevant jurisdictions;

·changes in government regulations, policies, tax, subsidies and incentives, particularly those concerning the electric utility industry and the solar industry;

·complex regulations in numerous jurisdictions, including political risks, including risks of expropriation and nationalization of assets, potential losses due to civil unrests, acts of terrorism and war, regional and global political or military tensions, strained or altered foreign relations, and protectionism;

·compliance with local environmental, safety, health and other labor laws and regulations, which can be onerous and costly, as the magnitude, complexity and continuous amendments to the laws and regulations are difficult to predict and liabilities, costs, obligations and requirements associated with these laws and regulations can be substantial;

·dependence on governments, utility companies and other entities for electricity, water, telecommunications, transportation and other utilities or infrastructure needs;

·local corporate governance and other legal requirements;

·difficulties with local operating and market conditions, particularly regarding customs, taxation and labor; and

·failure of our contractual parties to honor their obligations to us, and potential disputes with clients, contractors, suppliers or local residents or communities.

To the extent that our subsidiary ReneSola Jiangsu Ltd., formerly known as Wuxi Jiacheng Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd., or ReneSola Jiangsu, we had an annual module manufacturing capacity of 1.2 GW. Our module sales business has caused us to compete directly with some of our wafer customers, particularly as we increased the sales of our own branded modulesoperations are affected by unexpected and adverse economic, regulatory, social and political conditions in the market. As a result, our relationships with somejurisdictions in which we have operations, we may experience project disruptions, loss of our customers have been affected. In addition, as we implementassets and personnel, and other indirect losses that could adversely affect our business, strategy to expand our downstream solar power projects, the competition between us and other solar power projects players in the market is likely to intensify. If our customers stop purchasing wafers, modules or any upstream products from us altogether due to our competition with them or other reasons, our businessfinancial condition and results of operations will be materiallyoperations.

19

We operate in a highly competitive market and adversely affected.


many of our competitors have greater resources than we do. We may not be able to compete successfully outsource productionand we may lose or be unable to gain market share.

The solar market is increasingly competitive and continually evolving, which may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins or loss of market share by us. Our primary competitors include local and international developers and operators of solar power projects in those markets. Some of our competitors may have integrated with upstream solar manufacturers and may have advantages over us in terms of greater operational, financial, technical, management or other resources in particular markets or in general. They may have longer operating histories, stronger market positions, larger development capabilities, operation skills, greater resources, better brand name recognition, better access to favorable prices, more established distribution networks and larger customer bases than we do. As a result, they may be able to devote greater resources to the research, development, promotion and sale of their products or respond more quickly to evolving industry standards and changes in market conditions than we can. We only started our solar power projects business in recent years. There is no guarantee that we can compete successfully in the markets we currently operate or the markets we plan to enter in the future.

In addition, in certain of our target markets, such as China, state-owned and private companies have emerged to take advantage of the significant market opportunity created by attractive financial incentives and favorable regulatory environment provided by the governments. State-owned companies may have stronger relationships with local governments in certain regions and private companies may be more focused and experienced in developing solar power projects in the markets where we compete. Accordingly, we need to continue to be able to compete against both state-owned and private companies in these markets.

Moreover, the key barriers to enter into our industry at present consist primarily of in-depth market knowledge, skilled personnel, consistent development capacity, access to capital resources and competitive cost structure. If these barriers disappear or become more easily surmountable, new competitors may successfully enter our industry. If we fail to compete successfully, our business would suffer and we may lose or be unable to gain market share.

We also generate revenues from generation and sales of electricity. We believe that our primary competitors in these are the incumbent utilities companies which supply energy to our potential customers under highly regulated rate and tariff structures. We compete with these conventional utilities primarily based on price, predictability of price, reliability of delivery and the ease with which customers can switch to electricity generated by our solar power projects.

As the solar power and renewable energy industry grows and evolves, we will also face new competitors who are not currently in the market. Our competitors may also enter into strategic alliances or form affiliates with other competitors to our detriment. Suppliers or contractors may merge with our competitors which may limit our choices of contractors and hence the flexibility of our overall project execution capabilities. There can be no assurance that our current or potential competitors will not offer solar power projects or services comparable or superior to those that we offer at the same or lower prices or adapt more quickly than we do.

We also face competition from other renewable energy companies and non-renewable power industries, including nuclear energy and fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum and natural gas. Technological innovations in these other forms of energy may reduce their costs or increase their safety. Large-scale new deposits of fossil fuel may be discovered, which could reduce their costs. Local governments may decide to strengthen their support for other renewable energy sources, such as wind, hydro, biomass, geothermal and ocean power, and reduce their support for the solar industry. The inability to compete successfully against producers of other forms of power or otherwise enter into power purchase agreements favorable to us would reduce our market share, negatively affect our ability to develop and finance our projects and negatively impact our results of operations.

We operate in a highly competitive market. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share. Our market position depends on our financing, development and operation capabilities, reputation, experience and track record. Our failure to adapt to changing market conditions and to compete successfully with existing or new competitors in the solar power industry, as well as the other renewable energy companies and non-renewable power companies, will limit our growth and will have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

20

Our limited operating history in solar power projects business may not serve as an adequate basis to judge our future prospects and results of operations.

We started our solar power project development business in early 2014. We started our IPP business and started to sell electricity in 2014. See “Item 4. Information on the Company⸻B. Business Overview⸻Our Solar Power Projects” for details of our solar power products.

In the past, our module shipping requirements exceeded our production capacity from time to time, and we outsourced someprojects. Our historic track record of selling solar power projects or electricity may not be a reliable indicator of our production needsperformance and period-to-period comparisons of our operating results and our results of operations for any period should not be relied upon as an indication of our performance for any future period. In particular, our results of operations, financial condition, and future success depend, to meeta significant extent, on our target amount, including under arrangements where relatedability to continue to identify suitable sites, obtain required regulatory approvals, arrange financing from various sources, construct solar power projects in a cost-effective and third parties manufactured modules for us under supervision. We currently expecttimely manner, expand our project pipeline and manage and operate solar power projects that our module production capacity will be sufficient to meet our shipping requirements.we develop. If our shipping requirements exceed our production capacity again in the future,we cannot do so, we may not be able to successfully outsourceexpand our business at a profit or at all, maintain our competitive position, satisfy our contractual obligations, or sustain growth and profitability.

Our project operations may be adversely affected by weather and climate conditions, natural disasters and adverse work environments.

Solar power projects depend on the productionamount and intensity of sunlight, which is affected by weather and climate conditions. Any change of such conditions in the areas we operate that reduces solar radiation will adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, we may operate in areas that are under the threat of floods, earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, sandstorms, drought, or other inclement weather and climate conditions or natural disasters. If inclement weather or climatic conditions or natural disasters occur in areas where our solar power projects and project teams are located, project development, connectivity to the power grid and the provision of O&M services may be adversely affected. In particular, materials may not be delivered as scheduled and labor may not be available. As many of our solar power projects are located in the same region, such solar power projects may be simultaneously affected by weather and climate conditions, natural disasters and adverse work environments.

During periods of curtailed activity, we may continue to incur operating expenses. We may bear some or all of the losses associated with such unforeseen events. Moreover, natural disasters which are beyond our control may adversely affect the economy, infrastructure and communities in the countries and regions where we conduct our business. Such conditions may result in personal injuries or fatalities or have an adverse effect on our work performance, progress and efficiency or even result in personal injuries or fatalities.

Seasonal variations may influence our results of operations.

Changes in climate, geography, weather patterns, and other phenomena in the regions where we operate may significantly affect our business. For example, solar power projects depend on the amount and intensity of sunlight, which is affected by weather and climate conditions. As a result, our electricity generation and amount of electricity sold and therefore the revenue generated from our IPP business tend to be higher during periods or seasons when there is more irradiation. In addition, certain economic incentive programs, such as FIT regimes, generally include mechanisms that ratcheted down the incentives over time in line with the general trend of decreasing system costs of solar modules atpower projects. As a result, we may schedule significant construction activities to connect solar power projects to the cost,power grids prior to scheduled decreases in FIT rates, which vary from country to country, in order to qualify for more favorable FIT policies. Seasonal variations could adversely affect our results of operations and make them more volatile and unpredictable

We are subject to counterparty risks under our FIT price support schemes and PPAs.

As an IPP, we generate revenue from the sale of electricity primarily pursuant to FIT price support schemes or PPAs, which subject us to counterparty risks with respect to regulatory regimes. Relevant regulatory authorities may retroactively alter their FIT price support regimes in light of changing economic circumstances, changing industry conditions or for any number of other reasons. If the relevant government authorities, the local power grid companies or other counterparties or responsible parties do not perform their obligations under the FIT price support schemes and PPAs and we are unable to enforce our contractual rights, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

21

Any disputes with our project affiliates’ other equity owners may adversely affect our business.

Due to the regulations in certain jurisdictions, we can only hold certain project affiliates in less than 50% of the equity interests. We do not have control over the management and strategy with respect to solar power projects held by these project affiliates.

Our ability to direct the actions of or influence the decisions in relation to these affiliates or the solar power projects held by them is dependent on a number of factors, including reaching agreement with other stakeholders with respect to certain decisions, our rights and obligations under the relevant stakeholders’ agreements and the decision-making process by the board of directors or other governing bodies.

We may not successfully engage business partners that are reliable and capable. In addition, in the course of cooperation, our business partners may:

·have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours;

·take actions contrary to our instructions or make requests contrary to our policies or objectives;

·be unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the relevant cooperative arrangements, including their obligation to make the required capital contribution; or

·experience financial difficulties.

In particular, if our affiliates’ other equity owners decide to secure permits, EPC or O&M services from other parties or otherwise take any action that may not be in our best interest or fail to perform their respective obligations or otherwise breach the terms and quality satisfactory to us. We may incur additional costs to cure any defects or any delay in shipments and be exposed to additional risks in connection with outsourcing. We may also adjust our outsourcing capacity according to the market demands and company strategies. Any early terminationconditions of the contracts with the outsourcing parties may cause us to incur penalties.

Furthermore, we currently do not possess sufficient cell manufacturing capacity to meet the needs of our module manufacturing business and have to rely on external supplies of solar cells, which may not provide us with solar cells at the desirable quality or cost as compared to internal supplies. Further, we cannot be certain that external suppliers will meet our needs in a timely manner. There can be no assurance that there will continue to be an adequate supply of solar cells in the future or that we will continue to be able to procure quality solar cell supplies at prices acceptable to us in a timely manner. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that our solar cell manufacturing capacity will expand sufficiently and in a cost-effective manner to meet the internal demands from our module manufacturing business. Any disruption in the supply of solar cellsgoverning agreements, it could have a material adverse impact on our module business, which could in turn have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a dispute may arise with our current or future affiliate’s other equity owners and cause the loss of business opportunities or disruption to or termination of the relevant solar power projects. Such dispute may also give rise to litigation or other legal proceedings, which will divert our management’s attention and other resources. In the event that we encounter any of the foregoing problems, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to numerous laws and regulations at the national, regional and local levels of government in the areas where we do business. Any changes to these regulations and policies may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar projects and solar electricity, which may significantly reduce demand for our products and services or otherwise adversely affect our financial performance.

We conduct our business internationally and are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, some of which may conflict with each other and all of which are subject to change, including energy regulations, tax laws and regulations, environmental regulations, labor laws and other government requirements, approvals, permits and licenses.

In the counties where we do business, the market for solar power projects and solar electricity is heavily influenced by national, state and local government regulations and policies concerning the electric utility industry, as well as policies disseminated by electric utilities. These regulations and policies often relate to electricity pricing and technical interconnection of customer-owned electricity generation, and could deter further investment in the research and development of alternative energy sources as well as customer purchases of solar power technology, which could result in a significant reduction in the potential demand for our solar power projects and solar electricity.

Changes in applicable energy laws or regulations, or in the interpretations of these laws and regulations, could result in increased compliance costs or the need for additional capital expenditures. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could also be subject to civil or criminal liability and the imposition of fines. Further, national, regional or local regulations and policies could be changed to provide for new rate programs that undermine the economic returns for both new and existing projects by charging additional, non-negotiable fixed or demand charges or other fees or reductions in the number of projects allowed under net metering policies. National, regional or local government energy policies, law and regulation supporting the creation of wholesale energy markets is currently, and may continue to be, subject to challenges, modifications and restructuring proposals, which may result in limitations on the commercial strategies available to us for the sale of our power.

22

Regulatory changes in a jurisdiction where we are developing a project may make the continued development of the project infeasible or economically disadvantageous and any expenditure we have made to date on such project may be wholly or partially written off. Any of these changes could significantly increase the regulatory related compliance and other expenses incurred by the projects and could significantly reduce or entirely eliminate any potential revenues that can be generated by one or more of the projects or result in significant additional expenses to us, our offtakers and customers, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may also face regulatory risks imposed by various transmission providers and operators, including regional transmission operators and independent system operators, and their corresponding market rules. These regulations may contain provisions that limit access to the transmission grid or allocate scarce transmission capacity in a particular manner, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are also subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA, and other anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in the United States and the countries in which we conduct our business. We face significant liabilities if we fail to comply with the FCPA and other other anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws. We may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state-owned or affiliated entities. For example, in China, we enter into PPAs with local subsidiaries of the State Grid to sell our solar electricity. In other countries where we develop, acquire or sell solar projects, we need to obtain various approvals, permits and licenses from the local or national governments. We can be held liable for the illegal activities of our employees, representatives, contractors, partners, and agents, even if we do not explicitly authorize such activities. Any violation of the FCPA and other applicable anti-bribery laws and anti-money laundering laws could result in whistleblower complaints, adverse media coverage, investigations, loss of export privileges, severe criminal or civil sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and reputation. In addition, responding to any enforcement action may result in the diversion of management’s attention and resources, significant defense costs and other professional fees.

We may fail to comply with laws and regulations in the countries where we develop, construct and operate solar power projects.

The development and operation of solar power projects are highly regulated activities. We conduct our business in many countries and jurisdictions and are governed by different laws and regulations, including national and local regulations relating to building codes, taxes, safety, environmental protection, utility interconnection and metering and other matters. We also set up subsidiaries in these countries and jurisdictions which are required to comply with various local laws and regulations. While we strive to work with our local counsel and other advisers to comply with the laws and regulations of each jurisdiction in which we have operations, there may be instances of non-compliance, which may result in fines, sanctions and other penalties against the non-complying subsidiaries and its directors and officers. While we do not believe we have any non-compliances, singularly or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation, we cannot assure you that non-compliances will not occur in the future which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operation.

In order to develop solar power projects we must obtain a variety of approvals, permits and licenses from various authorities. The procedures for obtaining such approvals, permits and licenses vary from country to country, making it onerous and costly to track the requirements of individual localities and comply with the varying standards. Failure to obtain the required approvals, permits or licenses or to comply with the conditions associated therewith could result in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation or non-renewal of approvals, permits or licenses, or even criminal penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Any new government regulations pertaining to our business or solar power projects may result in significant claims under the product warranty obligationsadditional expenses. We cannot assure you that we assumed duringwill be able to promptly and adequately respond to changes of laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, or that our acquisition of ReneSola Jiangsuemployees and under the product warranty of ourcontractors will act in accordance with such laws. Failure to comply with laws and regulations where we develop, construct and operate solar modulespower projects may materially and adversely affect our profitability.business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Historically, our solar modules were typically sold with a warranty for minimum power output for up to 20 years following the date of sale. We also provided warranties for our solar modules against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of two years from the date of sale. We do not provide similar warranties for our solar wafers. We began selling solar modules in June 2009 after our acquisition of ReneSola Jiangsu. In connection with our acquisition of ReneSola Jiangsu, we also assumed all of the product warranty obligations that ReneSola Jiangsu granted to its customers on its module products. ReneSola Jiangsu provides warranties for minimum power output for up to 25 years following the date of sale. ReneSola Jiangsu also provides warranties for solar modules against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five to ten years from the date of sale. We are obligated to meet the performance requirements in accordance with ReneSola Jiangsu’s warranty policy. As a result of the long warranty periods, we bear the risk of extensive warranty claims long after we have sold our products and recognized revenues. If we receive significant warranty claims from the customers of ReneSola Jiangsu and the amount of warranty costs accrued exceeds our estimates, we will need to recognize higher warranty costs and our profits may be adversely affected.

23

 

We have been required to make assumptions regarding the durability and reliability of our solar modules. Our assumptions could prove to be materially different from the actual performance of our solar modules, causing us to incur substantial expense to repair or replace defective solar modules in the future. As we continue to expand our solar module business, we may be exposed to increased warranty claims. If our warranty provisions turn out to be inadequate, we may have to incur substantial expense to repair or replace defective products in the future. See “—Problems with product quality or product performance could result in increased costs, damage to our reputation and loss of revenues and market share.” Any increase in the defect rate of our products would cause us to increase the amount of our warranty reserves and have a correspondingly negative impact on our operating results. Furthermore, widespread product failures may damage our market reputation, reduce our market share and cause our sales to decline.


Restrictive covenants and undertakings under our bank loansproject financing arrangements and loan arrangements may limit the manner in which we operate and an event of default under the loan may adversely affect our operations.

 

We have entered into short-termobtain financing from financial institutions and long-term loans with commercial banksfund investors globally, as well as financing lease companies in China and overseas.China. These loansfinancing arrangements contain certain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, (i) dispose of or provide guarantees, pledges or mortgages on our operating assets in any manner that will increase risk to the lenders, (ii) repay shareholders loans or loans from our related parties, (iii) distribute dividends to shareholders, (iv) enter into other financial obligations to third parties, (v) transfer shares, (vi) make investments, and (v)(vii) take part in any mergers or acquisitions. For more information, about the loan agreements, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.” With our expansion into the downstream solar power projects business, we may continue to incur additional development loans, construction debtloans and project financing in connection with the development of solar power projects. Any breach by us of the various undertakings and covenants in our existing or future loan agreementsfinancing arrangements may give such bankslenders the right to demand immediate repayment of the outstanding loan amounts. We cannot assure you whether we will be subject to, or be able to fulfill, such undertaking in the future. Any failure to maintain any of the above covenants or undertakings could result in an acceleration of obligations under the facility agreement, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, the breach of any of the covenants and undertakings in any loan agreement may trigger the cross-default provisions in substantially all of our loan agreementsfinancing arrangements and/or the cross-acceleration provisions in some of those loan agreements,financing arrangements, thereby giving the lenders the right to accelerate our loan repayment obligations. As a result, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business and may be unable to engage in certain business activities or finance our future operations or capital needs.

 

Our recent and future capacity expansion has and will continue to utilize equipment with customized designs that will be contract manufacturedFailure by newour suppliers which subjects us to a number of risks.

Historically, we purchased all of our furnaces for the production of multicrystalline ingots from foreign equipment suppliers. From 2010 to 2011, we collaborated with a domestic equipment supplier in China to develop our own customized multicrystalline furnaces. We have used considerable resources on the development of these furnaces. Although our new multicrystalline furnaces have achieved satisfactory results to date, these furnaces may not achieve satisfactory results in the future and the equipment supplier may not be able to continue to manufacture and deliver the multicrystalline furnaces we require in a timely manner or be able to meet our quality and technical requirements. In addition, from time to time we may require additional customized equipment in connection with our business operation and manufacturing capacity expansion, whether in polysilicon manufacturing, wafer manufacturing, cell manufacturing or module manufacturing. As such equipment is not readily available from vendors and would be difficult to repair or replace, problems with quality or performance of the equipment or with timely delivery will negatively impact our expansion plans and may result in the failure to grow our revenues or reduce our manufacturing costs as originally intended. Problems with quality or performance of our products as a result of poor equipment performance or failure could result in losses and adversely affect our results of operations and reputation.

Our polysilicon raw material suppliers may fail to supplysupplying us with polysiliconsolar modules, balance-of-system components and other key components needed for our solar power projects in a timely manner, at a favorable price, or with the quantity or quality we require which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Any failure by our suppliers in supplying us with polysiliconsolar modules, balance-of-system components and other key components needed for our solar power projects in a timely manner and with the quantity or quality or at the level of pricing we require may adversely and materially impact our ability to fulfill our obligation in producing and delivering solar power productsprojects to our customerspurchasers in accordance with the sales contracts we entered into with such customers. From time to time, we becomemay be involved in negotiations and disputes with certain suppliers that supply us with polysiliconsolar modules, balance-of-system components and key components needed for our solar power projects with quality defects or regarding quantity and price. Any negotiation or litigation arising out of thesethe disputes with the suppliers could distract management from the day-to-day operation of our business subjects us to potentially significant legal expenses, the forfeiture of our advance payments to our polysilicon raw material suppliers and interruption of our polysilicon supply,project development and operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

Our advance payments to our silicon raw material suppliers expose us to the credit risk of such suppliers, which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

As of December 31, 2015, the outstandingWe typically made advance payments in connection with our procurement agreements amounted to approximately $18.5 million. We typically made such advance payments without receiving any collateral.for our solar power project business. To the extent that there wasis collateral and/or security attached to the advance payments, it is uncertain whether we will be able to enforce the collateral or the security or if the advance payment can be repaid in full upon enforcement on such collateral or security. Any litigation arising out of disputes relating to such prepayments could subject us to potentially significant legal expenses, distract management from the day-to-day operation of our business and expose us to risks for not being able to collect damages awarded to us, all of which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.


We may not be able to recover such advance payments and would suffer further losses shouldif any supplier fail to fulfill its delivery obligations under its supply contract, which would include failure to provide sufficient quantity of raw materials or raw materials of such quality as specified in the contract or shouldif a supplier’s stock price bebecomes less than the price agreed to settle to our claim. For example, we terminated a polysilicon feedstock purchase agreement with a supplier in 2009 due to its breach of the agreement terms and the supplier issued to us its publicly listed shares that carried a value equivalent to the value of our outstanding prepayment, based on the closing price of the shares on the day of the settlement agreement, as a settlement of its obligations under the agreement. Since these shares were issued to us in October 2009, their price has fallen significantly and, as a result, we have been required to record an impairment loss in 2009 and 2011. The supplier filed for bankruptcy protection under the CCAA in January 2012. As a result, we have fully written off the investment in the supplier. See “—We incurred and may incur in the future impairment losses on our investments in equity securities.” Similar claimsClaims by us for advance payments or other supplier obligations under the supply contracts in the future wouldmay potentially expose us to the credit risks of the suppliers and capitalother market risks and therefore materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

24

 

Future acquisitions, investments or alliances may have an adverse effect on our business.

 

If we are presented with appropriate opportunities, we may make additional investment into our solar power projects, in the United Kingdom, Japan, United States and other emerging markets, or acquire or invest in technologies, businesses or assets that are strategically important to our business or form alliances with key players in the solar power industry to further expand our business. Such acquisitions and investments could expose us to potential risks, including risks associated with the assimilation of new operations, technologies and personnel, unforeseen or hidden liabilities, the inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset the costs and expenses of acquisitions and potential loss of, or harm to, our relationships with employees, customers and suppliers as a result of the integration of new businesses. We may not be able to maintain a satisfactory relationship with our partners or handle other risks associated with future alliances, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Investments in new businesses may also divert our cash flow from servicing our debt and making necessary capital expenditures. In addition, we may incur impairment losses on our acquisitions and investments in equity securities.

 

We may lack sufficient experience in identifying, financing or completing large investments or acquisitions or joint venture transactions. Such transactions and the subsequent integration processes would require significant attention from our management. In addition, we may expand our business into international markets. In our international expansion, we may face economic, regulatory, legal and political risks inherent in having relationships, operations and sales in other jurisdictions, including challenges caused by distance and linguistic and cultural differences, as well as the potential for longer collection periods and for difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and enforcing contractual obligations. Expansion into new markets may also place significant additional burdens on our senior management and our sales and marketing teams. The diversion of our management’s attention and any difficulties encountered with respect to the acquisitions, investments, alliances, expansion or in the process of integration could have an adverse effect on our ability to manage our business. Any failure to integrate any acquired or new businesses or joint ventures into our operations successfully and any material liabilities or potential liabilities of any acquired businesses or joint ventures that are not identified by us during our due diligence process for such acquisitions or investments could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

 

If solar power technology is proven not suitable for widespread adoption, or if demand for solar power products continues to lag behind their supply, our revenues may decline and we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability.

The solar market is still in development and the extent of acceptance of solar power products remains uncertain. Historical and current market data on the solar power industry are not as readily available as those for established industries where trends can be assessed more reliably from data gathered over a longer period of time. In addition, demand for solar power products has not developed as fast as many market players have anticipated. Many factors may affect the viability of widespread adoption of solar power technology and demand for solar power products, including:


·cost-effectiveness, performance and reliability of solar power products compared to conventional and other renewable energy sources and products;

·success of other alternative energy generation technologies, such as wind power, hydroelectric power and biomass;

·fluctuations in economic and market conditions that affect the viability of conventional and other renewable energy sources, such as increases or decreases in the prices of oil and other fossil fuels or decreases in capital expenditures by end-users of solar power products;

·fluctuations in interest rates, which may affect the effective prices paid for solar power products by end-users who rely on long-term loans to finance their purchases; and

·deregulation of the electric power industry and the broader energy industry.

We have formulated our expansion plan based on the expected growth of the solar market. If solar power technology is proven not viable for widespread adoption or the demand for solar power products continues to decline, our revenues may continue to suffer and we may be unable to sustain our profitability.

We may experience difficulty in achieving acceptable yields and product performance, or may experience production curtailments or shutdowns.

 

The technology for the manufacture ofdeveloping and operating solar power productsprojects is continuously being modified in an effort to improve yields and product performance. Microscopic impurities such as dust and other contaminants, difficulties in the manufacturing process or unsuccessfulUnsuccessful adoption of new processing technologies or malfunctions of the equipment or facilities used can lower yields or increase the silicon consumption rate, cause quality control problems, interrupt production or result in losses of products in process. We may also experience floods, droughts, earthquakes, power losses, labor disputes and similar eventswithin or beyond our control that would affect our operations. See also “—Our polysilicon manufacturing facilities may not achieve our planned utilization rate or operational efficiency, which may negatively affect our profit margin. Any issues with our polysilicon manufacturing facilities as a result of operating hazards and natural disasters may limit our ability to manufacture such products.”

 

Any unplanned transmission line maintenance work with short notices from local electricity transmission line operators may forcesuspend our production to shut down,project developments and operations and limit our ability to manufacture products and to fulfill our commitments to customers on a timely basis. Our polysilicon, wafer and cell manufacturing processes may generate hazardous waste. Although our technology and equipment are designed to minimize and eliminate the leakage of such waste, unexpected accidents may result in environmental consequences, production curtailments, shutdowns or reduced productions and even cause property damage, personal injury or loss of life. Any such event could result in civil lawsuits or regulatory enforcement proceedings, which in turn could lead to significant liabilities.

 

Advances in solar power project technology could render our productsprojects uncompetitive or obsolete, which could reduce our market share and cause our sales and profit to decline. The solar market is characterized by evolving technology and customer needs. Some of our competitors may devise productiondevelopment technology that enables them to produce larger and thinner wafersoperate the solar power projects with higher quality than our products at a higher yield and lower cost. In addition, some producers have focused on developing alternative forms of solar power technology, such as thin-film technology. We will need to invest significant financial resources in research and development to maintain our market position, keep pace with technological advances in the solar power industry and effectively compete in the future. Our failure to further refine our products and technology or to develop and introduce new solar power products could cause our products to become uncompetitive or obsolete, which could reduce our market share and cause our revenues to decline. In addition, if we or our customers are unable to manage product transitions, our business and results of operations would be negatively affected.


25

Our business depends substantially on the continuing efforts of our executive officers and key employees, and our business may be severely disrupted if we lose their services.

 

Our future success depends substantially on the continued services of our executive officers and key employees, such as Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer. If Mr. Xianshou Li, other executive officers or key employees were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may be unable to replace them easily, in a timely manner, or at all. Our business may be severely disrupted, our financial conditions and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected and we may incur additional expenses to recruit, train and retain personnel. If any of our executive officers or key employees joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose customers, suppliers, know-how and key professionals and staff members. Each of our executive officers and key employees has entered into an employment agreement with us, which contains non-competition provisions. However, if any dispute arises between our executive officers and us, these agreements may not be enforceable in China, where these executive officers reside, in light of uncertainties with China’s legal system. See “—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us.”

 

Our future success depends, to a significant extent, on our ability to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, particularly technical personnel with expertise in the solar power industry. Since our industry is characterized by high demand and intense competition for talent, there can be no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain qualified technical staff or other highly-skilled employees that we will need to achieve our strategic objectives. As our business has grown rapidly, our ability to train and integrate new employees into our operations may not meet the growing demands of our business. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, our business may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, it is typical in the solar industry for highly-skilled employees to enter into employment agreements that contain strict non-competition provisions with their employers. If a dispute arises involving our employee, his or her former employer and us, such as a dispute over the violation of non-competition provision or other restrictive covenants, it could result in our loss of such key employee and adversely impact our operation and business. Any prolonged litigation may also result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and adversely impact our business and reputation.

 

Problems with productthe quality or product performance of our developed solar power projects could result in increased costs, damage to our reputation and loss of revenues and market share.

 

FromIn our project development business, substantially all of our purchasers may require us to provide retention money, performance bond or bank guarantee for a certain period of time to time, we encounter sales returns due to non-conformity with customers’ specificationssecure the quality and are required to replace our products promptly.While in the past we had an insignificant return rate, we cannot assure you that in the future our products will not contain defects that are not detected until after they are shipped or installed. Any proven defects could lead to return or refundperformance of our products under our warranties, cause us todeveloped solar power projects. During the covered period of time, if any significant defects or efficiency problem arises from sold solar power projects, it may incur additional costs andto us for providing remedial measures, divert the attention of our personnel from our operations.operations and cause the retention money to be deducted or forfeited. Similarly, if we fail to maintain the consistent quality of our other productssolar power projects via effective quality control, we may deliver products with defects or other quality problems, which may result in increased costs associated with replacements or other remedial measures. Product defects and the possibility of product defectsit could also cause significant damage to our market reputation, and reduce our product sales and market share.share and adversely affect our results of operations and business.

 

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and investor confidence and the market price of our ADSs may be adversely impacted.

We are subject to reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hasor the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, adopted rules requiring every public company to include a management report on the effectiveness of such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report, which containsreport.

In connection with management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. In addition, an independent registered public accounting firm must audit and report on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our reporting obligations as a public company have placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future.

Therefore, we have established a system of internal control over financial reporting and we constantly reevaluate those controls and our related systems. Our management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by Rule 13-a-15(c) offor the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and we have concluded thatyear ended December 31, 2017, our management identified one material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, was effective for our fiscal year endedand determined that as of December 31, 2015. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of2017, our internaldisclosure controls our management may conclude thatand procedures and our internal control over financial reporting iswere ineffective. See “Item 15 — Controls and Procedures.” As a non-accelerated filer, we are not effectiverequired to provide an attestation on the effectiveness of our internal control by our independent registered public accounting firm under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the requirements of the SEC promulgated thereunder. As defined in the future. Moreover, effectivestandards established by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB, a “material weakness” is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is necessary for usa reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects our ability to produce reliableinitiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial reportsdata reliably in accordance with U.S. GAAP such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of our financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by our employees.

The material weakness identified related to our lack of sufficient accounting and financial reporting personnel with appropriate knowledge of U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements to formalize and carry out key controls over the financial reporting process and to prevent fraud. As a result,properly address complex accounting issues and to prepare and review consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting requirements. Although we have taken measures and plan to continue to take measures to remedy the material weakness, the implementation of these measures may not fully address the material weakness in our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, and we may not conclude that they have been fully remedied. The process of designing and implementing an effective financial reporting system is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a financial reporting system that satisfies our reporting obligations.

In addition, during the course of documenting and testing our internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, we may identify other material weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm has not undertaken a comprehensive assessment of our internal control for purposes of identifying and reporting material weaknesses and other control deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. In light of the material weaknesses and control deficiencies that were identified as a result of the limited procedures performed, we believe it is possible that, had our independent registered public accounting firm performed an audit of our internal control over financial reporting, additional material weaknesses and control deficiencies may have been identified.

Our failure to correct these control deficiencies or our failure to discover and address any other control deficiencies could result in the loss of investor confidenceinaccuracies in the reliability of our financial statements which in turnand could harmalso impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and related regulatory filings on a timely basis. As a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and negatively impactprospects, as well as the markettrading price of our ADSs.


ADSs, may be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, as we further grow our business, particularly moving up the solar power product value chain into new business areas and expanding our operations globally, we are required to adopt additional procedures and safeguards with respect to our accounting andineffective internal control over financial reporting systems, including revenue recognition procedures, to ensure the accuracy and timeless of our financial reporting andsignificantly hinders our ability to prevent fraud. DevisingWe may also incur additional costs and implementing newuse management and other resources in order to comply with Section 404 and remediate the material weakness.

26

If our operational internal control system fails to detect, prevent or remedy risks in our business as intended or if there is any misconduct by our employees in violation of our policies or applicable laws and regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, and our reputation could be severely damaged.

We maintain an operational internal control system consisting of an operational internal control department, a whistleblower hotline and other channels for internal reporting, and policies and procedures take timethat are designed to monitor and resourcescontrol potential risk areas relevant to our business operations. However, due to the inherent limitations in the design and causeimplementation of any operational internal control system, we cannot assure you that our operational internal control system will be able to identify, prevent and remedy all risks arising from our business activities as intended or otherwise effectively be implemented, monitored or managed by us. Moreover, we cannot guarantee all of our employees will act in compliance with our employee policies and be applicable laws and regulations. Any misconduct or violation by our employees could adversely affect our business and reputation or lead to regulatory sanctions being imposed against us or causing us to incur litigation costs.

In addition, starting from early 2014, we began to expand our operations into the global energy efficient products and services business and downstream solar power projects. Since September 2017, after the business restructuring, we have transformed into a solar project developer and operator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the world. Although we will continue to reassess and seek ways to improve upon our operational internal control system as necessary, the transformation of our business operations may give rise to additional costs. There will be inherent limitationsoperational internal control risks that are currently unknown to us, despite any efforts to anticipate such procedures and can be no assurance that such procedures will always workrisks.

If our operational internal control system fails to detect risks in our business as intended or willto be effective. Any failure by useffectively implemented, monitored and managed, or if we fail to deviseadopt new operational internal control procedures commensurate with our expanding business operations and impact of business restructuring, or properly implement adequate proceduresif our employees fail to maintain effective control over financial reporting when we expand into new business areas or shiftcomply with our policies and applicable laws and regulations, our business, focus could have a material adverse effect on ourfinancial condition and results of operations could be materially and financial condition.adversely affected, and our reputation could be severely damaged.

 

Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights may undermine our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual property rights may be costly.

 

We rely primarily on patent and trademark laws, trade secrets, employee contractual protections and other contractual restrictions to establish and protect our intellectual property.properties and proprietary rights. Nevertheless, these afford only limited protection and the actions we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to provide us with meaningful protection or commercial advantage. For example, we had 235 patents in China, 86 pending patent applications in China, and 4 pending international patent applications as of December 31, 2015. We cannot assure you that our patent applications will be eventually issued with sufficiently broad coverage to protect our technology and products. As a result, third parties may be able to use the technologies that we have developed and compete with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. In addition, contractual arrangements, such as the confidentiality and non-competition agreements and terms between us and our research and development personnel, afford only limited protection and the actions we may take to protect our trade secrets and other intellectual property may not be adequate. Our failure to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights may undermine our competitive position. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property and proprietary rights. Policing the unauthorized use of proprietary technology can be difficult and expensive. In particular, the laws and enforcement procedures of the PRC and certain other countries are uncertain or do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws and enforcement procedures of the United States. See “—Risks Related to Doing BusinessWe cannot assure you that we will not be involved in China—Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system couldother intellectual property litigations that might adversely affect us.” We may need to resort to court proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rightsresults of operations and financial condition in the future. For example, we filed a case with the First Intermediate Court of Beijing against Tongxiangshenhong, a manufacturer of lighting equipment in China, in May 2014 with respect to its misappropriation of “YUHUIYANGGUANG” as trademarks over certain of its lighting equipment products. The court decided in August 2015 and partly rejected the registration of “YUHUIYANGGUANG” on solar water heater, solar collector and solar heat collector by Tongxiangshenhong, while granting it the registration on street lamp, a lamp cover, a lighting device with luminous tube, lighting apparatus and device and automobile lamp. We appealed this case to the Superior Court of Beijing, which upheld the lower court’s decision in December 2015. Litigation relating to our intellectual property might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention away from our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual property and proprietary rights and may harm our business, prospects and reputation.

27

We may be exposed to intellectual property infringement or misappropriation claims by third parties which, if determined adversely to us, could cause us to pay significant damage awards.

Our success depends largely on our ability to use and develop our technology and know-how without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The validity and scope of claims relating to solar power technology patents involve complex scientific, legal and factual questions and analysis and, therefore, may be highly uncertain. We may be subject to litigation involving claims of patent infringement or violation of intellectual property rights of third parties. The defense and assertion of intellectual property suits, patent opposition proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings can be both costly and time-consuming and may significantly divert the efforts and resources of our technical and management personnel. An adverse determination in any such litigation or proceedings against us could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, including requiring us to seek licenses from third parties, to pay ongoing royalties or to pay monetary and punitive damages or subjecting us to injunctions that prohibit the manufacture and sale of our products or the use of our equipment. Protracted litigation could also result in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their purchase or use of our products until resolution of such litigation, which could result in losses and adversely affect our results of operations and reputation.

 

Compliance with environmental regulations can be expensive, and non-compliance with these regulations may result in adverse publicity and potentially significant monetary damages and fines.

 

AsDuring the construction process of our manufacturing processes, including producing polysilicon, producing ingots, slicing wafers and producing solar cells and modules,power projects, we may generate noise, waste water and gaseous and other industrial waste, wewaste. We are required to comply with all applicable regulations regarding protection of the environment. During our project development process, we often prepare environmental impact assessment reports as part of the permitting process. Once operational, our solar power projects do not generate industrial waste. We are in compliance with present environmental protection requirements in all material respects and have all material environmental permits necessary to conduct our business. However, if more stringent regulations are adopted in the future, the cost of compliance with these new regulations could be substantial. If we fail to comply with present or future environmental regulations, we may be required to pay substantial fines, suspend production or cease operations. We use, generate and discharge toxic, volatile and otherwise hazardous chemicals and waste in our research and development and manufacturing activities. Any failure by us to control the use of or to adequately restrict the discharge of hazardous substances could subject us to potentially significant monetary damages and fines or suspensions in our business operations.


Our solar module products must comply with the applicable environmental regulations where they are installed and we may incur expenses to design and manufacture our products so as to comply with such regulations. For example, we increased our expenditures to comply with the European Union’s Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive, which took effect in July 2006, by reducing the amount of lead and other restricted substances used in our solar module products. Furthermore, we may need to comply with the European Union’s Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive if solar modules and products are re-classified as consumer electronics under the directive or if our customers located in other markets demand that they comply with this directive. This would require us to implement manufacturing process changes, such as changing the soldering materials used in panel manufacturing in order to continue to sell into these markets. If compliance is unduly expensive or unduly difficult, we may lose market share and our financial results may be adversely affected.

 

Increasing environmental concerns and climate change risks associated with fossil fuel-based power generation have created political momentum to implement strategies aimed at the reduction of emissions of carbon dioxide and certain other gases commonly referred to as “greenhouse gases.” Renewable energy sources such as solar power help address these environmental concerns, and governments around the world have implemented a variety of policy initiatives to accelerate the development and adoption of solar power. While passage of climate change legislation or other regulatory initiatives that regulate or restrict emissions of greenhouse gases may encourage use of solar power and accordingly increase demand for our productsprojects and services, this could also cause us to incur additional direct costs in complying with any new environmental regulations during our manufacturingdevelopment and research and developmentconstruction processes, as well as increased indirect costs resulting from our customers, suppliers or both incurring additional compliance costs that get passed on to us.

Cyber security risks and breaches could adversely affect our business and disrupt our operations.

We are subject to cyber security risks and may incur costs to minimize those risks. Cyber security breaches, such as unauthorized access, accidents, employee errors or malfeasance, computer viruses, computer hackings or other disruptions, could compromise the security of our data and infrastructure, thereby exposing such information to unauthorized access by third parties. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage systems, change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to remedy, protect against or alleviate these and related problems, and we may not be able to remedy these problems in a timely manner, or at all. Any security breaches that occur could disrupt our operations, increase our security costs, or expose us to potential losses due to data corruption or information leakage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

28

 

We have limited insurance coverage and may incur losses resulting from product liability claims or business interruptions.

 

As the insurance industry is still developing in China, the product liability insurance and business interruption insurance available in China offer limited coverage compared to that offered in many other countries. We currently havemaintain property insurance, commercial general liability insurance, quality insurance, accidentpublic liability insurance, machine damage insurance, transportation insurance, credit saleconstruction insurance, as well as key-man life insurance, director and officer liability insurance. We do not maintain any insurance for business interruption. Any business disruption or natural disaster could result in substantial costs and a diversion of resources, which would have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

 

Similar to other solar power product manufacturers, weWe are exposed to risks associated with product liability claims if the use of our solar power productsprojects results in injury. Since our solar wafers are made into electricity generating devices and our solar modules generate electricity, it is possible that users could be injured or killed by our products as a result of product malfunctions, defects, improper installation or other causes. We cannot predict whether product liability claims will be brought against us in the future or the effect of any resulting negative publicity on our business. The successful assertion of product liability claims against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages and require us to make significant payments.

The audit reports includedRegistered public accounting firms in this annual report are prepared by auditors whoChina, including our independent registered public accounting firm, are not inspected by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which deprives us and as such, you are deprivedour investors of the benefits of such inspection.

 

Our independentAuditors of companies whose shares are registered public accounting firm that issues the audit reports included in our annual reports filed with the SEC as auditors of companies that areand traded publicly in the United States, and aincluding our independent registered public accounting firm, must be registered with the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB, isand are required by the laws inof the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB to assess itstheir compliance with the laws inof the United States and professional standards. Because our auditors arestandards applicable to auditors. Our independent registered public accounting firm is located in, and organized under the laws of, the PRC, which is a jurisdiction where the PCAOB, notwithstanding the requirements of U.S. law, is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the Chinese authorities, our auditors are not currently inspectedauthorities. In May 2013, the PCAOB announced that it had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on Enforcement Cooperation with the CSRC and the MOF, which establishes a cooperative framework between the parties for the production and exchange of audit documents relevant to investigations undertaken by the PCAOB.PCAOB, the CSRC or the MOF in the United States and the PRC, respectively. The PCAOB continues to be in discussions with the CSRC and the MOF to permit joint inspections in the PRC of audit firms that are registered with the PCAOB and audit Chinese companies that trade on U.S. exchanges.

 

Inspections of other firms that the PCAOB has conducted outside China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. This lack of PCAOB inspections in China prevents the PCAOB from regularlyfully evaluating our auditor’s audits and its quality control procedures.procedures of our independent registered public accounting firm. As a result, we and investors may bein our ADSs are deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections.


The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our auditor’sindependent registered public accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to PCAOB inspections. Investors mayinspections, which could cause investors and potential investors in our stock to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and procedures and the quality of our financial statements.

 

Proceedings instituted byIf additional remedial measures are imposed on the SEC against fiveBig Four PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, in administrative proceedings brought by the SEC alleging the firms’ failure to meet specific criteria set by the SEC, we could result inbe unable to timely file future financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

 

Starting in 2011In December 2012, the Chinese affiliates ofSEC instituted administrative proceedings against the “big four”Big Four PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, were affectedalleging that these firms had violated U.S. securities laws and the SEC’s rules and regulations thereunder by a conflict between U.S. and Chinese law. Specifically, for certain U.S. listed companies operating and audited in mainland China,failing to provide to the SEC and the PCAOB sought to obtain from the Chinese firms access to theirfirms’ audit work papers and related documents. Thewith respect to certain PRC-based companies that are publicly traded in the United States. On January 22, 2014, the Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, presiding over the matter rendered an initial decision that each of the firms were, however, advised and directed that under PRC law they could not respond directlyhad violated the SEC’s rules of practice by failing to produce audit work papers to the U.S. regulators on those requests,SEC. The initial decision censured each of the firms and that requestsbarred them from practicing before the SEC for a period of six months. The Big Four PRC-based accounting firms appealed the ALJ’s initial decision to the SEC. The ALJ’s decision does not take effect unless and until it is endorsed by foreign regulators for accessthe SEC. In February 2015, each of the Big Four PRC-based accounting firms agreed to such papers in China hada censure and to be channeled through the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or CSRC.

In late 2012, this impasse ledpay a fine to the SEC to commence administrative proceedings under Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practicesettle the dispute and also under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 against the Chinese accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm. A first instance trial of the proceedings in July 2013 in the SEC's internal administrative court resulted in an adverse judgment against the firms. The administrative law judge proposed penalties on the firms including a temporaryavoid suspension of their rightability to practice before the SEC although that proposed penalty did not take effect pending review by the Commissioners of the SEC. On February 6, 2015, before a review by the Commissioner had taken place,and audit U.S.-listed companies. The settlement required the firms reached a settlement with the SEC. Under the settlement,to follow detailed procedures and to seek to provide the SEC accepts that future requests by the SEC for the production ofwith access to Chinese firms’ audit documents will normally be made to the CSRC. The firms will receive matching Section 106 requests, and are required to abide by a detailed set of procedures with respect to such requests, which in substance require them to facilitate production via the CSRC. If theyfuture document productions fail to meet specified criteria, the SEC retains authority to impose a variety of additional remedial measures on the firms depending on the nature of the failure. Remedies for any future noncompliance could include, as appropriate, an automatic six-month bar on a single firm’s performance of certain audit work, commencement of a new proceeding against a firm, or in extreme cases the resumption of the current proceeding against all four firms.

In the event thatWhile we cannot predict if the SEC restartswill further review the Big Four PRC-based accounting firms’ compliance with specified criteria or if the results of such a review would result in the SEC imposing penalties such as suspensions or restarting the administrative proceedings, depending uponif the final outcome, listed companies in the United States with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossibleaccounting firms are subject to retain auditors in respect of their operations in the PRC, which could result inadditional remedial measures, our ability to file our financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with theSEC requirements of the Exchange Act, including possible delisting. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against these audit firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding China-based, United States-listed companies and the market price of our ADSs may be adversely affected.

If our independent registered public accounting firm was denied, even temporarily, the ability to practice before the SEC and we were unable to timely find another registered public accounting firm to audit and issue an opinion on our financial statements, our financial statements could be determinedimpacted. A determination that we have not to betimely filed financial statements in compliance with theSEC requirements of the Exchange Act. Such a determination could ultimately lead to the delisting of our ordinary sharesADSs from the NYSENew York Stock Exchange or deregistration from the SEC,termination of the registration of our ADSs under the Exchange Act, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our ADSs in the United States.

29

 

We face risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks.

 

Our business could be adversely affected by the effects of avian flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, swine flu or another epidemic or outbreak. From 2005 to present, there have been reports on the occurrence of avian flu, in various parts of China and elsewhere in Asia,SARS or swine flu, including a few confirmed human cases and deaths. There have also been an outbreak of swine flu occurred in Mexico and the United States and there have been recent cases in China and elsewhere in Asia. Most recently, Shanghai has activated an emergency plan in response to cases of death and serious illness caused by a swine flu virus in the local region. Any prolonged occurrence or recurrence of avian flu, SARS, swine flu or other adverse public health developments in China may have a material adverse effect on our business operations. Our operations may be impacted by a number of health-related factors including, among other things, quarantines or closures of our facilities, which could severely disrupt our operations, the sickness or death of our key officers and employees, and a general slowdown in the Chineselocal or global economy. Any of the foregoing events or other unforeseen consequences of public health problems could adversely affect our business and results of operations. We have not adopted any written preventive measures or contingency plans to combat any future outbreak of avian flu, SARS, swine flu or any other epidemic.


Risks Related to Doing Business in China

We may fail to comply with laws and regulations regarding the development, construction and operation of solar power projects and solar production projects in China.

The development, construction and operation of solar power projects and the generation and sale of solar power are highly regulated activities. The activities in China are governed by different laws and regulations, including national and local regulations relating to renewable energy, urban and rural planning, building codes, safety, environmental protection, fire control, utility transmission, engineering and metering and related matters. We are required to obtain approvals, permits and licenses and we are subject to filings with the provincial and/or regional regulatory authorities, such as the NDRC. See “Item 4. Information on the Company⸻B. Business Overview⸻Regulation⸻China⸻Renewable Energy Law and Other Government Directives.” Any failure to obtain any required approvals, permits, licenses, filings or to comply with the conditions associated therewith could result in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation or non-renewal of approvals, permits or licenses, or even criminal penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any new government regulations pertaining to solar power projects may result in significant additional expenses to the development, construction and operation of solar power projects and, as a result, could cause a significant reduction in demand for our solar power projects and services.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to promptly and adequately respond to changes of laws and regulations, or that our employees and contractors will act in accordance with our internal policies and procedures. Failure to comply with laws and regulations where we develop, construct and operate solar power projects may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Adverse changes in political and economic policies of the PRC government could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China, which could reduce the demand for our products and materially and adversely affect our competitive position.

 

We conduct substantially all of ourhave business operationsand sales conducted in China. As the solar industry is highly sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels, it tends to decline during general economic downturns. Accordingly, our results of operations, financial condition and prospects are subject to a significant degree to economic, political and legal developments in China. China’s economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including with respect to the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth in the past decades, growth has been uneven across different regions and among various economic sectors of China. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic development and guide the allocation of resources. While some of these measures benefit the overall PRC economy, they may also have a negative effect on us. Furthermore, the PRC government may pass measures to tighten credit, including trade financing, available in the PRC market, which could materially impact our financing. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable to us. As the PRC economy is increasingly intricately linked to the global economy, it is affected in various respects by downturns and recessions of major economies around the world, such as the recent financial services and economic crises of these economies. The various economic and policy measures the PRC government enacts to forestall economic downturns or shore up the PRC economy could affect our business.

30

 

The PRC economy has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy. Although the PRC government has implemented measures since the late 1970s emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in China are still owned by the state-owned enterprises. In addition, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The PRC government also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Future actions and policies of the PRC government could materially affect our liquidity and access to capital and our ability to operate our business.

 

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us.

 

We are a holding company and we conduct our business primarily through our subsidiaries incorporated in China. These subsidiaries are generally subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China. The PRC legal system is based on written statutes. Prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Since the late 1970s, PRC legislation and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, since the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involve uncertainties, which may limit legal protections available to us. In addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.


Expiration of, or changes to, current PRC tax incentives that our business enjoys could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

Our subsidiaries ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd., formerly known as Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd., or ReneSola Zhejiang, ReneSola Jiangsusolar project SPVs are currently eligible for corporate income tax incentives in China which granted them corporate income tax exemption for the first three years and Sichuan ReneSola currently qualify as high-new technology enterprises and enjoy a reduced corporate income tax rate of 15%. The current high-new technology enterprise status of ReneSola Zhejiang, ReneSola Jiangsu and Sichuan ReneSola was renewed in 2015 and will be validat 12.5% for a term ofthe next three years until December 31, 2017. However, we cannot assure you that new laws may not change the preferential treatment granted to our subsidiaries. Any loss or substantial reduction of the tax benefits enjoyed by us would reduce our net profit.years.

 

Moreover, underUnder the Enterprise Income Tax Law and its relevant implementation rules promulgated by National People’s Congress of China and State Council of China which took effect in 2008, enterprises organized under the laws of jurisdictions outside of China with their de facto management bodies located within China may be considered PRC resident enterprises and, therefore, subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide income. The Implementing Regulation of the Enterprise Income Tax Law defines “de facto management body” as an establishment that exerts substantial overall management and control over the operation, personnel, financial affairs, assets and other aspects of the enterprise. If a majority of the members of our management team continues to be located in China, we may be deemed as a PRC tax resident enterprise and, therefore, subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on our worldwide income except that the dividends we received from our PRC subsidiaries may be exempt from the enterprise income tax to the extent that such dividends are deemed as dividends among PRC resident enterprises. If our current tax benefits expire or otherwise become unavailable to us for any reason, our profitability may be materially or adversely affected.

 

In addition, all of our PRC subsidiaries are required to pay value added tax, or VAT, with respect to their respective gross sales proceeds. Prior to July 2007, when exporting products, ReneSola Zhejiang was entitled toOur PRC solar project SPVs are currently eligible for a 13% refundspecial VAT incentive of "50% VAT that it had already paid or borne. However, starting July 1, 2007, such VAT refund was reduced to 5%, which materially affects the gross marginRefund upon Collection" on sale of our overseas sales. According to the latest tax regulation, the VAT refund applicable to ReneSola Zhejiang has been reverted to 13% from April 1, 2009.The VAT refund applicable to ReneSola Jiangsu is 17%.self-produced photovoltaic power. Our profitability may be materially and adversely affected if this VAT refund changes significantly and frequently.

31

 

Our ability to make distributions and other payments to our shareholders depends to a significant extent upon the distribution of earnings and other payment made by ReneSola Zhejiang.our subsidiaries.

 

We conduct substantially all of our operationsbusiness in China through ReneSola Zhejiang.our subsidiaries. Our ability to make distributions or other payments to our shareholders depends on payments primarily from ReneSola Zhejiang.Renesola (Zhejiang) PV Power Co., Ltd. (“Renesola PV Power”). The payment of dividends by entities organized in China is subject to limitations. Regulations in the PRC currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits as determined in accordance with accounting standards and regulations in China. Pursuant to the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Wholly Foreign-owned Enterprises, effective on March 1, 2014, ReneSola ZhejiangRenesola PV Power is also required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profit, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds until the accumulative amount of such reserves reaches 50% of its registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. ReneSola ZhejiangRenesola PV Power is also required to allocate a portion of its after-tax profits, as determined by its board of directors, to its staff welfare and bonus funds, which may not be distributed to equity owners. In addition, when ReneSola ZhejiangRenesola (Zhejiang) PV Power Co., Ltd. incurs debt on its own behalf, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. For example, according to certain loan agreements between ReneSola Zhejiang and its banks, ReneSola Zhejiang is not permitted to pay dividends for any given year if it has no after-tax profit or any principal or interest due in that year that has not been paid.

 

Under the Enterprise Income Tax Law, dividends payable by us and gains on the disposition of our shares or ADSs could be subject to PRC taxation.

 

Pursuant to the new PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its Implementing Regulation, which became effective on January 1, 2008, a 10% withholding tax applies to dividends, interests, rent or royalties payable by a foreign-invested enterprise, such as our PRC subsidiary, to any of its non-resident enterprises investors for PRC enterprise income tax purposes unless any such non-resident enterprise’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. The British Virgin Islands, where our company was incorporated, does not have such a treaty with China. Thus, we expect that a 10% withholding tax will apply to dividends paid to us by our PRC subsidiaries if we are classified as a non-resident enterprise. Circular CaiShui [2008] No.1 jointly issued by the PRC State Administration of Taxation and Minister of Finance on February 22, 2008 further clarifies that dividends distributed by foreign-invested enterprise to foreign investors out of the profits generated before January 1, 2008 are still exempt from withholding tax even if they are paid after January 1, 2008. Our PRC entities’ undistributed earnings, generated after January 1, 2008, have been and will not be distributed to us since such earnings will permanently reinvestedbe used to reinvest to the PRC entities. Therefore, no dividend withholding tax was accrued.


We are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. Under the new PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its Implementing Regulation, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with “de facto management bodies” within the PRC is considered a PRC resident enterprise. The Implementing Regulation defines the term “de facto management bodies” as “establishments that carry out substantial and overall management and control over the manufacturing and business operations, personnel, accounting, properties, etc. of an enterprise.” Substantially all of our management members are based in the PRC. Accordingly, we may be considered a PRC resident enterprise. If we are determined to be a PRC resident enterprise following the “de facto management bodies” concept, our shareholders and ADS holders who are deemed non-resident enterprise may be subject to the new PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law at the rate of 10% upon the dividends paid by us or the gains on the disposition of our shares or ADSs; similarly, our noteholders who are deemed non-resident enterprise may be subject to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law at the rate of 10% upon the interest of the notes paid by us and the gains realized on the conversion, sale, exchange or redemption of such notes.

 

Fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

 

Our sales in China are denominated in Renminbi, and our exportinternational sales are generally denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros, Australian dollars, Japanese yen, British pounds South African rand, Mexican peso and Indian rupee.other local currency. Our costs and capital expenditures are largely denominated in Renminbi and foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars Euros, British pounds and Japanese yen.Euros. Fluctuations in exchange rates could affect our net profit margins and could result in foreign exchange losses and operating gains or losses. In addition, our foreign currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currencies.

 

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar, the EuroEuros, British pounds and other currencies is affected by, among other things, changes in China’s political and economic conditions and China’s foreign exchange policies. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the Renminbi was permitted to fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. This change in policy caused the Renminbi to appreciate approximately 21.5% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Since reaching a high against the U.S. dollar in July 2008, the Renminbi traded within a narrow band against the U.S. dollar until June 2010, remaining within 1% of its July 2008 high but never exceeding it. In June 2010, the People’s Bank of China announced that the PRC government would reform the Renminbi exchange rate regime and increase the flexibility of the exchange rate. Starting from March 17, 2014, the People’s Bank of China widened the band to 2% around which the value of the Renminbi is allowed to deviate from the daily reference rate, which may allow for greater volatility in the U.S. dollar and Renminbi exchange rate. To further improve the Renminbi exchange rate mechanism, the People’s Bank of China announced that government authorities shall continue to improve the marketization of the Renminbi exchange rate mechanism, increase efforts to introduce a market-determined exchange rate, promote international balance of payments, and improve the floating exchange rate system based on market supply and demand in its Guiding Opinions on implementing the Several Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Support for Stable Growth of Foreign Trade on June 6, 2014. In the long term, Renminbi may further depreciate against U.S. dollar or other foreign currencies, depending on the market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies. It is difficult to predict how long the current situation may last and when and how it may change again.

 

32

In addition, as we rely entirely on dividends paid to us by our operating subsidiaries, such as the operating subsidiaries in China, any significant depreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar may have a material adverse effect on our revenues and financial condition, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our shares. For example, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi amount we receive from the conversion. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our shares or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us. As a proportion of our revenue is paid to us in EuroEuros and Japanese yen,British pounds, fluctuation between the EuroEuros and the Renminbi as well as yenBritish pounds and the Renminbi may also have a material effect on our results of operations.


Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to receive and use our revenues or financing effectively.

 

A significant portion of our revenues and expenses are denominated in Renminbi. If our revenues denominated in Renminbi increase or expenses denominated in Renminbi decrease in the future, we may need to convert a portion of our revenues into other currencies to meet our foreign currency obligations, including, among others, payment of dividends declared, if any, in respect of our shares or ADSs. Under China’s existing foreign exchange regulations, ReneSola Zhejiangour PRC subsidiary, Renesola PV Power is able to pay dividends in foreign currencies, without prior approval from State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, we cannot assure you that the PRC government will not take further measures in the future to restrict access to foreign currencies for current account transactions.

 

Foreign exchange transactions by ReneSola ZhejiangRenesola PV Power under capital accounts continue to be subject to significant foreign exchange controls and require the approval of or registration with PRC governmental authorities.authorities or the institution being delegated. In particular, if ReneSola ZhejiangRenesola PV Power borrows foreign currency loans from us or other foreign lenders, these loans must be registered with SAFE and if we finance by means of additional capital contributions, these capital contributions must be approved or registered by certain government authorities including the PRC Ministry of Commerce SAFE and the State Administration of Industry and Commerce, or SAIC, or their local counterparts.counterparts, and registered with the bank as delegated by SAFE. These limitations could affect the ability of ReneSola ZhejiangRenesola PV Power to conduct foreign exchange transactions in China, and could affect our business and financial condition.

 

If we are required to obtain the prior approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission for the listing and trading of our ADSs on the NYSE, we may face regulatory actions or other sanctions which may adversely affect our financial condition.

 

On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies, including the CSRC, promulgated the Provisions on Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors that became effective on September 8, 2006 and were amended on June 22, 2009. This regulation, among other things, has provisions that purport to require that an offshore special purpose vehicle, or SPV, formed for listing purposes and controlled directly or indirectly by PRC companies or individuals shall obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such SPV’s securities on an overseas stock exchange. On September 21, 2006, the CSRC published on its official website procedures specifying documents and materials required to be submitted to it by SPVs seeking CSRC approval of their overseas listings.

 

We completed the listing of our ADSs on the NYSE in January 2008 and completed our follow-on offerings in June 2008, October 2009 and September 2013. We did not seek CSRC approval in connection with our initial public offering or our follow-on offerings. However, the application of this PRC regulation remains unclear with no consensus currently existing among the leading PRC law firms regarding the scope and applicability of the CSRC approval requirement. Our PRC counsel at the time of listing advised us that because we completed our restructuring for the initial public offering before September 8, 2006, the effective date of the new regulation, it was not and is not necessary for us to submit the application to the CSRC for its approval, and the listing of our ADSs on the NYSE did not require CSRC approval.

 

33

If the CSRC or another PRC regulatory agency subsequently determines that CSRC approval was required for the initial public offering or the follow-on offerings, we may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in the PRC, limit our operating privileges in the PRC, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from our initial public offering and the follow-on offerings into the PRC or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of our ADSs.

 

If the CSRC later requires that we obtain its approval, we may be unable to obtain a waiver of the CSRC approval requirements if and when procedures are established to obtain such a waiver. Any uncertainties and/or negative publicity regarding this CSRC approval requirement could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our ADSs.


PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident shareholders to personal liability and limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiary, limit our subsidiary’s ability to increase its registered capital, distribute profits to us, or otherwise adversely affect us.

 

In May 2013, SAFE issued the Notice regarding Printing and Distributing the Provisions on Foreign Exchange Administration over Direct Investment Made by Foreign Investors in China and the Supporting Documents, or Notice 21, which provides detailed disclosure requirements and examination standards for SAFE registration of foreign investors (including overseas SPVs established by PRC residents) with respect to their establishment of foreign investment enterprises or projects in China.

 

In July 2014, SAFE released the Notice on Simplifying Certain Matters Related to the Foreign Exchange Administration Over the Overseas Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investments by Domestic Residents Via Special Purpose Vehicles, or Notice 37.

 

According to these regulations, registration with the local SAFE branch is required for PRC residents to establish or to control an offshore company for the purpose of investment and financing by utilizing the domestic or overseas assets or equity they legally hold. PRC residents should register their initial foreign exchange at the time when they contribute their domestic or overseas assets and interests into the SPVs. Notice 21 imposes additional SAFE registration responsibilities for such SPVs’ direct investments in China.

 

Moreover, as Notice 37 applies retroactively, PRC residents who had made capital contributions to SPVs based on their lawful domestic or overseas assets or interests but did not go through overseas investment foreign exchange registration formalities prior to the implementation of Notice 37 should provide their local SAFE branch with written explanations regarding their failure to do so, and the local SAFE branch will conduct registration retrospectively based on the principle of legality and reasonableness. For more details of Notice 37, see “Item 4. Information of the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation.Regulation—China—Regulation of Foreign Currency Exchange and Dividend Distribution—Dividend Distribution.

 

We have urged our shareholders who are PRC residents to make the necessary applications and filings as required under these regulations. To our knowledge, our principal shareholders have completed the necessary filings as required under these regulations. In addition, according to rules issued by SAFE, if a PRC resident participates in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly-listed company, a qualified PRC domestic agent must, among other things, file on behalf of such participant an application with SAFE to conduct the SAFE registration with respect to such stock incentive plan. We have made filings with the local SAFE branch of Jiashan County in connection with the options we granted to our PRC employees under our 2007 share incentive plan, as amended and restated in January 2009, August 2010, August 2012 and August 2016, or the 2007 share incentive plan, but were told that such registration is not required for now. We will make such filing and registration in accordance with the rules issued by SAFE if required by local SAFE branch. We attempt to comply, and attempt to ensure that our shareholders who are subject to these rules comply with the relevant requirements. However, we cannot provide any assurances that all of our shareholders who are PRC residents will comply with our request to make or obtain any applicable registrations, amend the existing registrations or comply with other requirements required by Notice 37 or other related rules. The failure or inability of our PRC resident shareholders to make any required registrations or comply with other requirements may subject such shareholders to fines and legal sanctions and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into or provide loans to our PRC subsidiary, limit our PRC subsidiary’s ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute profits to us, or otherwise adversely affect us.

 

34

Risks Related to Doing Business in International Markets Outside of China

Our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected by developments in other countries that are beyond our control.

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows depend partially on the level of economic activity, government and foreign exchange policies and political and economic developments in our other principal targeted international markets outside of China, such as North America, Turkey, Poland, Hungary, Spain, France and emerging markets in Southeast Asia. Our business, revenues and prospects, as well as our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the market price of our ADSs, may also be materially and adversely affected by developments in international markets relating to inflation, interest rates, currency fluctuations, government subsidies, taxation, expropriation, as well as any protectionism, exchange control regulations, price and wage controls, social instability or other political, economic or diplomatic developments. We have no control over these conditions and developments which could adversely affect us and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows or the price or market of our ADSs. See additional risks in “Item 3. Key Information⸻D. Risk Factors⸻Risks Related to Our Business.”

Risks Related to Our ADSs, Warrants and Shares

 

The market price for our ADSs may be volatile; the trading price of our convertible senior notes and the value of the warrants could be significantly affected by the market price of the ADSs and other factors.

 

The market price for our ADSs has been highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. During the period from January 29, 2008, the first day on which our ADSs were listed on the NYSE, until April 27, 2016,26, 2018, the market price of our ADSs ranged from $0.91$2.12 to $29.48$147.4 per ADS.ADS, after giving effect to the ADS Ratio Change. The market price of our ADSs may continue to be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to a wide variety of factors including the following:

 

·actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

 

·our quarterly or annual earnings, or those of other companies in our industry;

·changes in financial estimates by securities research analysts or our ability to meet those estimates;

 

·changes in the economic performance or market valuations of other solar power companies;

 

·changes in investors’ and analysts’ perceptions of our industry, business or related industries;

 

·changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

 

·announcements by us or our competitors of new products, patent litigation, issuance of patents, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

 

·technological breakthroughs in the solar and other renewable energy industries;

 

·reduction, modification, delay or elimination of government subsidies and other economic incentives for the solar power industry;

 

·regulatory developments in our target markets affecting us, our customers or our competitors;

 

·potential litigation or administrative investigations;

 

·addition or departure of key personnel;

 

·fluctuations of exchange rates between the RMB and U.S. dollar, Euro or other foreign currencies;

 

·sales or anticipated sales of additional ADSs;

 

·35exercise of our warrants;

 

·release of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding ADSs or shares or sales of additional ADSs;

 

·the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies;

 

·general market conditions, fluctuations or other developments affecting us or our industry; and

 

·general economic conditions and conditions in the credit markets.

 

You should note that the stock prices of solar power companies have experienced wide fluctuations. Such wide market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our ADSs. The market price of the ADSs will likely continue to fluctuate in response to the factors discussed above, many of which are beyond our control.

 

The price of the ADSs could also be affected by possible sales of the ADSs by investors who view our warrants as more attractive means of equity participation in us and by hedging or arbitrage trading activity that we expect to develop involving the ADSs. This trading activity could, in turn, affect the value of our warrants.

In addition, the securities market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. Such fluctuations have occurred since 2008, and have impacted the trading price of our ADSs. Continued market fluctuations may materially and adversely affect the market price of our ADSs.

 

Our existing principal shareholders have substantial influence over our company, and their interests may not be aligned with the interests of our other shareholders.

 

Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer, beneficially owned 24.4%60.3% of our shares as of March 31, 2016.February 28, 2018. As such, Mr. Li has substantial influence over our business, including decisions regarding mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and might reduce the price of our ADSs. For example, holders of a majority of our shares entitled to vote in a duly convened and constituted shareholders’ meeting may pass a shareholders’ resolution to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix the powers and rights of these shares, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our existing shares. Preferred shares could thus be issued with terms that would delay or prevent a change in control or make removal of management more difficult. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by our other shareholders and holders of our ADSs.

We depend on ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. to supply polysilicon, solar wafers, solar cells, solar modules and other products that are important to our business. The termination or breach of the supply agreement could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

After disposal of our manufacturing business, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., an entity now under the control of Mr. Xianshou Li, agreed to supply us any polysilicon, solar wafers, solar cells or solar modules, on the same terms as such products are offered to any third party. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions⸻B. Related Party Transactions⸻Transaction with our Chief Executive Officer and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd.”.

Since we do not control ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., and because we depend on it for supplying polysilicon, solar modules and other products which are important to the operation of our business in China, we face certain risks with respect to our relationship with it. If ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. breaches its obligations under the agreement, terminates the agreement, or refuses to renew the agreement on terms less favorable to us, we may not be able to find a suitable alternative supplier immediately. Similarly, if we default under the agreement, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. could terminate the agreement and halt supplies that are important to our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


36

We may need additional capital and may sell additional ADSs or other equity, equity-linked or debt equity securities or incur indebtedness, which could result in additional dilution to our shareholders or increase our debt service obligations. Hedging activities may depress the trading price of our ADSs.

The solar industry is currently being negatively impacted by a number of factors including excess capacity, reduction of government incentives in key solar markets, higher import tariffs and the European debt crisis. These factors have contributed to declining average selling prices for our products. As of December 31, 2015, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $466.1 million. While we had cash and cash equivalents of $38.0 million, we also had short-term bank borrowings of $667.7 million all due within one year and the current portion of long-term bank borrowings amounted to $1.1 million, which is not expected to be renewed.

 

We require a significant amount of cash to fund our operations due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. We currently also have a significant amount of debt outstanding.pursue, and repay our outstanding debt. We may issue additional equity, equity-linked or debt securities, or obtain a credit facility for a number of reasons, including to finance our operations and business strategy, to satisfy our obligations for the repayment of existing indebtedness, or for other reasons. Any future issuances of equity securities or equity-linked securities could further dilute the interests of our shareholders and may materially adversely affect the price of our ADSs. We cannot predict the timing or size of any future issuances or sales of equity, equity-linked or debt securities, or the effect, if any, that such issuances or sales may have on the market price of our ADSs. We also cannot be sure that we will not need to raise additional capital in the future as a result of continuing or worsening economic conditions or otherwise. Market conditions could require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our securities in the future.future, which may result in the issuance of securities that have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of the shares and ADSs. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. We cannot assure you that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

 

Future issuances of shares or ADSs may adversely affect the price of the ADSs.

 

SalesWe may from time to time access to the capital market to raise our capital. In addition, we have reserved our shares and ADSs for the holders’ exercise of our shares or ADSs in the public market and after offerings of our warrants, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our ADSs to decline or could make it more difficult for us to raise funds through the sale of equity in the future. Likewise, additional equity financings or other issuances of shares or ADSs by us could adversely affect the market price of the ADSs.

We cannot be sure that we will not need to raise additional capital in the future as a result of continuing or worsening economic conditions or otherwise. If we do need to raise additional capital, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on favorable terms or at all. In addition, any such financing could be significantly dilutive to existing shareholders and holders of the ADSs and result in the issuance of securities that have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of the shares and ADSs.

A substantial number of the ADSs are reserved for the exercise of share options which are granted to directors and employees pursuant to our 2007 share incentive planplan. All ADSs sold in our initial public offering and the follow-on offerings are freely transferable without restriction or additional registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. The remaining ADSs outstanding after the initial public offering and the follow-on offerings are currently available for the exercise of our warrants. The conversion of some or all of our warrants will dilute the ownership interests of existing shareholderssale, subject to volume and holdersother restrictions as applicable under Rule 144 and Rule 701 of the ADSs.Securities Act. The issuance and sale of a substantial number of shares or ADSs, or the perception that such issuances and sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of the shares or ADSs and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.

 

All ADSs sold in our initial public offering and the follow-on offering are freely transferable without restriction or additional registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. The remaining ADSs outstanding after the initial public offering and the follow-on offering are currently available for sale, subject to volume and other restrictions as applicable under Rule 144 and Rule 701 of the Securities Act.


As a holder of our ADSs, you may not have the same voting rights as the holders of our shares and may not receive voting materials in time to be able to exercise your right to vote.

 

Holders of ADSs do not have the same rights as our shareholders and may only exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. When a general meeting is convened, ADS holders may not receive sufficient notice of a shareholders’ meeting to permit such holders to withdraw their shares to allow them to cast their vote with respect to any specific matter. If requested in writing by us, the depositary will mail a notice of such a meeting to ADS holders. In addition, the depositary and its agents may not be able to send voting instructions to ADS holders or carry out ADS holders’ voting instructions in a timely manner. We will make all reasonable efforts to cause the depositary to extend voting rights to ADS holders in a timely manner. Furthermore, the depositary and its agents will not be responsible for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any vote is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, you may not be able to exercise your right to vote. In addition, in your capacity as an ADS holder, you will not be able to call a shareholder meeting.

 

The depository for our ADSs may give us a discretionary proxy to vote our shares underlying your ADSs if you do not give voting instructions, which could adversely affect your interests.

 

Under the deposit agreement for the ADSs, if we asked for your instructions but the depositary does not receive your instructions by the cutoff date it sets, the depositary will give us a discretionary proxy to vote the shares underlying your ADSs as to all matters at the shareholders’ meeting unless:

 

·we instructed the depositary we do not wish to receive a discretionary proxy;

 

·we informed the depositary that there is substantial opposition to the particular matter; or

 

·the particular matter would have a material adverse impact on shareholders.

37

 

The effect of this discretionary proxy is that if you do not give voting instructions, you cannot prevent the shares underlying your ADSs from being voted, except in the circumstances described above. This may make it more difficult for shareholders to influence the management of our company. Holders of our shares are not subject to this discretionary proxy.

 

You may not be able to participate in rights offerings and may experience dilution of your holdings as a result.

 

We may from time to time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make rights available to ADS holders in the United States unless we register the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. Also, under the deposit agreement for the ADSs, the depositary will not offer those rights available to ADS holders unless the distribution to ADS holders of both the rights and any related securities are either registered under the Securities Act or exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to cause such a registration statement to be declared effective. In addition, we may not be able to take advantage of any exemptions from registration under the Securities Act. Accordingly, in the event we conduct any rights offering in the future, the depositary may not make such rights available to holders of ADSs or may dispose of such rights and make the net proceeds available to such holders. As a result, holders of our ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution in their holdings.

 

You may be subject to limitations on transfer of your ADSs.

 

Your ADSs represented by the ADRs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books from time to time when it deems that it is expedient for the performance of its duties. In addition, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary deem it advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.


The issuance of warrants as well as the sales of a significant number of the ADSs in the public markets, or the perception of these sales, could depress the market price of the ADSs.

The number of shares issuable upon exercise of warrants and the sales of a substantial number of our ADSs or other equity-related securities in the public markets could depress the market price of the ADSs, and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We cannot predict the effect that future sales of the ADSs or other equity-related securities would have on the market price of the ADSs.

In addition, we may issue additional shares or ADSs for future acquisitions. If we pay for our future acquisitions in whole or in part with additionally issued shares or ADSs, our investors’ ownership interests in our company would be diluted and this, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the price of the ADSs.

Any future offerings or exercise of warrants will dilute the ownership interest of existing shareholders and holders of our ADSs.

In September 2013, we completed a registered direct offering of 15,000,000 ADSs, representing 30,000,000 of our shares, and warrants to purchase up to 10,500,000 additional shares, representing 35% of warrant coverage in the offering, at approximate $70 million before exercise of warrants.  The warrants are exercisable immediately and will expire four years from the date of issuance.  Any exercise of some or all of the warrants or any future offering of convertible notes or similar securities will dilute the ownership interests of existing shareholders and holders of the ADSs and may depress the price of the shares or ADSs. In addition, any sales in the public market of the ADSs issuable upon such conversion or future offerings could adversely affect prevailing market prices of the shares or ADSs.

 

We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of our ADSs or shares.

 

Based on the market price of our ADSs, the value of our assets, and the composition of our income and assets, we do not believe we were a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our taxable year ended December 31, 2015.2017. However, the application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects, and we cannot assure you the U.S. Internal Revenue Service will not take a contrary position. A non-U.S. corporation will be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if, applying applicable look-through rules, either (i) at least 75% of its gross income for such year is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based(determined based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. A separate determination must be made after the close of each taxable year as to whether we were a PFIC for that year. The determination of PFIC status involves extensive factual investigation, including ascertaining the fair market value of all of our assets on a quarterly basis and the character of each item of income that we earn, and is subject to uncertainty in several respects. In particular, the application of the PFIC rules to certain of our business lines is complex and unclear, and we cannot guarantee that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, will agree with any positions that we take. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will not be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year or that the IRS will not take a contrary position.

If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation”) holds an ADS or a share, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to such U.S. Holder. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation—Passive foreign investment company.”

 

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under British Virgin Islands law, conduct substantially all of our operations in China and most of our officers and directors reside outside the United States.

 

We are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, and conduct substantially all of our operations in China through our wholly owned subsidiary in China. Most of our directors and officers reside outside of the United States, and some or all of the assets of those persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an original action against us or against these individuals in a British Virgin Islands or China court in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. It may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors, most of whom are not residents of the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the British Virgin Islands or the PRC would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state. There is no statutory recognition in the British Virgin Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, although the courts of the British Virgin Islands will generally recognize and enforce a non-penal judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits. It is uncertain whether such British Virgin Islands or PRC courts would be competent to hear original actions brought in the British Virgin Islands or the PRC against us or such persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state.


38

Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association and by the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004 and common law of the British Virgin Islands. The rights of shareholders to take legal action against our directors and us, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under British Virgin Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the British Virgin Islands. The common law of the British Virgin Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the British Virgin Islands as well as from the common law in England and other countries in the Commonwealth, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the British Virgin Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under British Virgin Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in the United States. In particular, the British Virgin Islands has no securities laws as compared to the United States, and provides significantly less protection to investors. In addition, British Virgin Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action before the federal courts of the United States.

 

As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulties in protecting their interests through actions against our management, directors or major shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States.

 

Our ADSs may not comply with the minimum listing requirements of the NYSE, and may therefore be subject to delisting if we are not able to regain compliance within the prescribed timeframe.

Our ADSs are currently listed on the NYSE. The NYSE has minimum requirements that a company must meet in order to remain listed on the NYSE. These requirements include maintaining a minimum average closing price of $1.00 per share over a period of consecutive 30 trading days and an average market capitalization of not less than $50 million over a 30 trading day period and stockholders’ equity of not less than $50 million. On November 7, 2016, we received a notice from the NYSE that the average closing price of our ADSs (prior to the ADS Ratio Change) was below the listing requirements. In order to bring the price of the ADSs into compliance with the listing requirements, we executed the ADS Ratio Change. As a result, effective from February 10, 2017, the number of our shares represented by each ADS has been changed from two shares to 10 shares. On March 1, 2017, we received a notice from the NYSE that a calculation of the average closing price of our ADSs for the 30-trading days ended February 28, 2017 indicated that the average closing price of our ADSs was above the minimum requirement of $1.00 based on a 30-trading day average. Accordingly, we have resumed compliance with all NYSE continued listing requirements.

On July 26, 2017, we received another notice from the NYSE that the total market capitalization and the stockholders’ equity were below the listing requirements. In order to regain the compliance, we conducted a non-cash restructuring to dispose of substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business, such that we could dispose of our asset-heavy and debt-heavy businesses and focus on our asset-light and high-margin project business. The disposition was completed in September 2017. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions⸻B. Related Party Transactions⸻Transaction with our Chief Executive Officer and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd.” for details. On October 24, 2017, we submitted a business plan to the NYSE to demonstrate our plan to regain compliance within the continued listing requirements of the NYSE. On December 7, 2017, the NYSE accepted our business plan and recognized that we were trading at levels in excess of $50 million average market capitalization. We resumed compliance with all NYSE continued listing requirements and the NYSE will continue to perform quarterly reviews during the 18 months from the date of the NYSE notice on July 26, 2017. On January 3, 2018, we provided the NYSE an update analyzing our third quarter 2017 progress and the plan submission and it was accepted by the NYSE on January 26, 2018.

39

We cannot assure you that we will maintain compliance with all the NYSE’s continued listing requirements. If we were unable to regain compliance with the minimum share price within the prescribed timeframe or if we are unable to maintain compliance with any of the NYSE’s continued listing requirements in the future, our ADSs would be subject to delisting. A delisting of our ADSs could negatively impact us by, among other things, reducing the liquidity and market price of our ADSs; reducing the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our ADSs, which could negatively impact our ability to raise equity financing; decreasing the amount of news and analyst coverage for us; and limiting our ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

 

A.History and Development of the Company

 

Our predecessor, Zhejiang Fengding Construction Material Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd., or Fengding Construction, was established as a limited liability company in the PRC in 2003. Following a series of share transfers, Fengding Construction was renamed ReneSola Zhejiang in June 2005 and commenced the solar power business in July 2005.

 

ReneSola Ltd was incorporated as a limited liability company in the British Virgin Islands on March 17, 2006. Our choice of the British Virgin Islands as the jurisdiction of incorporation was motivated in part by its relatively well-developed body of corporate law, various tax and other incentives, and its acceptance among internationally recognized securities exchanges as a jurisdiction of incorporation for companies seeking to list securities on such exchanges. As we are a limited liability company under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, the liability of our shareholders to our company is limited to (i) any amount unpaid on a share held by the shareholder and (ii) any liability to repay a distribution by our company that was not made in accordance with the laws of the British Virgin Islands. Our principal executive offices are located at 7/F, Block B, Future Land Holdings Tower, No. 8 Baoqun5, Lane 388, Zhongjiang Road, Yaozhuang County, Jiashan Town, Zhejiang Province,Putuo District, Shanghai, PRC. Our telephone number is+86 (573) 8477-3321.is +86 (21) 6280-9180. Our registered office is located at the offices of Harneys Corporate Services Limited, Craigmuir Chambers, P.O. Box 71, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Our agent for service of process in the United States is CT Corporation System, located at 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011.

 

As of the date of this annual report,December 31, 2017, we conduct our business primarily through the following significant subsidiaries:

 

·ReneSola Zhejiang: our operating company established in China in August 2003, wholly owned by us and engaged in wafer manufacturing in China. ReneSola acquired all of the equity interests in ReneSola Zhejiang in April 2006 through a series of transactions that were accounted for as a reorganization;

·ReneSola America Inc.Renesola (Zhejiang) PV Power Co., or ReneSola America: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the State of Delaware, the United States in November 2006 to facilitate our procurement of silicon raw materials and product sales in North America;

·ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in Singapore in March 2007 to facilitate our polysilicon procurement and product sales outside of China;

·Sichuan ReneSola: our wholly owned subsidiary established in Sichuan Province, China in August 20072017 to engage in the production of polysilicon. We began building a polysilicon manufacturing facility in Meishan, Sichuan Province, in 2007 through Sichuan ReneSola;hold our Chinese subsidiaries.

·ReneSola Jiangsu: our wholly owned subsidiary located in Yixing, Jiangsu Province, China which is engaged in the production of solar cells and modules.

ReneSola Zhejiang acquired the 100% equity interest in ReneSola Jiangsu for a total cash consideration of RMB140.3 million, including tax paid in connection with the transfer of equity interests, in May 2009, as part of our growth strategy. ReneSola Jiangsu commenced its cell manufacturing in October 2008 and its module manufacturing in November 2005. In November 2013, ReneSola Zhejiang and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. entered into an agreement, pursuant to which ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. agreed to invest RMB200 million in ReneSola Jiangsu, increasing its share capital to RMB800 million. After completion of such capital increase, ReneSola Zhejiang and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. held 75% and 25% of ReneSola Jiangsu’s equity interests, respectively. ReneSola Zhejiang and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd are all wholly owned subsidiaries of ReneSola. ReneSola Jiangsu received the approval from the local commercial authority in December 2013;

 

·Zhejiang ReneSola System IntegrationInvestment Ltd., formerly known as Zhejiang ReneSola Photovoltaic Materials Co., Ltd.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in China in April 2010February 2015 to engage in the productiontrading and sale of crucibles, steel wires and silicon carbon powder;

·ReneSola Deutschland GmbH: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporatedinvestments in Germany in September 2011 to engage in the sales of modules, cells and wafers,solar industry, as well as the operation of solar power projects;holding our project companies in China.

 

·ReneSola New Energy S.A.R.L: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in Luxembourg in March 2012to engage in trading and investments in solar industry, as well as holding our solar power projects;

 

·ReneSola Investment Management Ltd.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the British Virgin Islands in December 2014 to engage in investments in solar industry, as well as holding our solar power projects; and

·Sichuan Bobo Electric Power Engineering Ltd.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in China in January 2017 to conduct EPC business; and

 

·ReneSola Power Inc.Holdings LLC.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the United States in July 2015 to engage in investments in solar industry, as well as holding ourto conduct solar power projects; and

·ReneSola UK Limited: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the United Kingdom in April 2013 to engage in the sales of modules, as well as the operation of solar power projects.

We established additional wholly owned subsidiaries in China to engage primarily in the research, development, production, sale or installation of certain manufacturing materials, solar energy technology, solar technology consulting services, solar energy equipment, PV power generation related projects, electric power technology, power supply and equipment, technology achievement transformation and transferring related to PV power and photo thermal.

From time to time, we also disposed of our subsidiaries in China. For example:

·In 2013, we closed our wholly owned subsidiary, Gaotai Yuhui New Energy Co., Ltd., which engaged in preparation work for solar PV project development due to our business needs. We sold all of our 91.3% equity interest in Zhejiang Ruiyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd., which engaged in the research and development of new manufacturing materials, and all of our 60% equity interests in Ningde Hengyang New Energy Development Co., Ltd., which engaged primarily in the development and sale of solar energy products and investment and management of new energy; andbusiness.

·In 2014, we disposed of (i) our wholly owned subsidiary Zhejiang Ruixu Investment Co., Ltd., or Zhejiang Ruixu, together with two of its subsidiaries, Qinghai Yuhui and ReneSola Keping Co., Ltd., and three of its solar power plants in China; (ii) our wholly owned subsidiary Jiashan Xinlian Solar Power Co., Ltd., which engaged primarily in the investment, development and management of solar energy power stations; (iii) all of our 93.5% equity interests in ReneSola Zhejiang Carbon Fiber Material Co., Ltd., which engaged primarily in the development, production and sale of carbon fiber materials and other carbon products, (iv) our wholly-owned subsidiary ReneSola Zhejiang Energy-Saving Technology Co., Ltd., and (v) our wholly-owned subsidiary Sichuan OuRuida Science Park Co., Ltd.

Since 2006, we have established other wholly owned subsidiaries outside of China, including in the United States, Singapore, Luxemburg, Germany, France, India, Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom, Croatia, South Africa, Panama, Korea and Russia to expand our businesses in international markets as part of our growth strategy with respect to the module segment. We have also established our North and South American regional headquarters in San Francisco, and our Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa regional sales headquarters in Singapore. Since 2014, we opened new branch offices and warehouse facilities in Thailand, Mexico, Turkey, Indonesia, Austria, Chile, Ontario in Canada, South Africa, Australia and Japan in order to continue to expand our business operations in the international markets.

We have made acquisitions in complementary businesses outside China. For example, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., our wholly owned subsidiary, acquired 100% of the equity interest of Nove Eco Energy Eood and MG Solar Systems Eood in Bulgaria in April 2012 as project assets. These two projects were sold to a Luxembourg-based private equity fund in March 2015. We also acquired 100% of the equity interest in Lucas Est S.R.L and Ecosfer Energy S.R.L in Romania in September 2012 as project assets. In March 2013, we acquired Lucas Est Korea Co., Ltd. and Ecosfer Energy Korea Co., Ltd., which became our wholly owned subsidiaries.

In July 2015, we entered into an agreement with Pristine Sun, LLC, or Pristine, a San Francisco-based solar project developer, to form a joint venture in the United States to accelerate our U.S. project development. On December 3, 2015, ReneSola filed an action in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, alleging that Pristine had breached the joint venture agreement, or the Action. Pristine subsequently filed a cross-complaint alleging that we breached the joint venture agreement. On March 25, 2016, we entered into a binding settlement term sheet with Pristine and certain of its affiliates to resolve our dispute, dismiss the Action and transfer 88 MW solar energy projects under development in California, North Carolina, and Minnesota by Pristine and its affiliates to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States. Upon consummation of the transfer, we will be the 100% indirect owner of the 88 MW portfolio of solar energy projects.

As of December 31, 2015, our worldwide sales and distribution network was composed of 26 offices and 59 warehouses.

 

For our organization structure as of the date of this annual report, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.”

 

With respect to our securities, in August 2006, we placed 33,333,333 shares on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange, or the AIM, and raised gross proceeds of approximately $50.0 million. In November 2010, with the approval of our board of directors, our shares ceased to trade on the AIM, and our admission to trading on the AIM was cancelled.

In January 2008, we and certain selling shareholders completed our initial public offering of 10,000,0002,000,000 ADSs, listedrepresenting 20,000,000 of our shares, on the NYSE. In June 2008, we completed a follow-on public offering of 10,350,0002,070,000 ADSs, representing 20,700,000 of our shares, sold by us and certain selling shareholders. In October 2009, we completed another follow-on public offering of 15,500,0003,100,000 ADSs, representing 31,000,000 of our shares, sold by us.

40

 

In March and April 2011, we completed an offering of $200 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2018. The convertible senior notes will maturematured on March 15, 2018. In connection with the pricing of the notes, we entered into a capped call transaction and an additional capped call transaction, which cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, the number of ADSs underlying the option notes, with an affiliate of one of the initial purchasers of the notes, or the hedge counterparty. The carrying value of our convertible senior notes was $26.1 million as of December 31, 2015. We repurchased all of the remaining outstanding convertible senior notes during the first quarter of 2016.

 

In September 2013, we completed a registered direct offering of 15,000,0003,000,000 ADSs, representing 30,000,000 of our shares, and warrants to purchase up to 10,500,000 additional shares, representing 35% of warrant coverage in the offering, at approximate $70 million before exercise of warrants.  The warrants arewere exercisable immediately and will expireexpired in September 2017, four years from the date of issuance. 


In September 2015, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $20 million in aggregate value of our outstanding ADSs within 12 months ending September 2016 on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. In September 2016, our board decided to extend the share repurchase program for another 12 months ending September 2017. As of MarchDecember 31, 2016,2017, we repurchased an aggregate of 1,310,577441,906 ADSs, representing 2,621,154approximately 4,419,060 shares, on the open market for a total cash consideration of $1.5$2.3 million. 1,614,776All of such repurchased shares were canceled in November 2015, and the remaining are expected to be canceled in the second quarteras of 2016.December 31, 2017.

 

Our board of directors authorized the ADS Ratio Change in January 2017. Effective from February 10, 2017, the number of our shares represented by each ADS has been changed from two shares to 10 shares. For our ADS holders, this ADS Ratio Change had the same effect as a one-for-five reverse split. No new shares were issued in connection with the ADS Ratio Change. Our ADSs continue to be traded on the NYSE under the symbol “SOL.” The ADS Ratio Change did not reduce any ADS holder’s percentage ownership interest in us, except for minor adjustments that may result from the treatment of fractional ADSs. Proportionate voting rights and other rights and preferences of the ADS holders were not reduced by the ADS Ratio Change, subject to the treatment of fractional ADSs.

On July 26, 2017, we received a notice from the NYSE that the total market capitalization and the stockholders’ equity were below the listing requirements. In order to regain the compliance, we conducted a non-cash restructuring to dispose of substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business, such that we could dispose of our asset-heavy and debt-heavy businesses and focus on our asset-light and high-margin project business. On October 24, 2017, we submitted a business plan to the NYSE to demonstrate our plan to regain compliance within the continued listing requirements of the NYSE. On December 7, 2017, the NYSE accepted our business plan and recognized that we were trading at levels in excess of $50 million average market capitalization. We resumed compliance with all NYSE continued listing requirements and the NYSE will continue to perform quarterly reviews during the 18 months from the date of the NYSE notice on July 26, 2017. On January 3, 2018, we provided the NYSE an update analyzing our third quarter 2017 progress and the plan submission and it was accepted by the NYSE on January 26, 2018.

In September 2017, the disposition of substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business, was completed. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions⸻B. Related Party Transactions⸻Transaction with our Chief Executive Officer and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd.”

For the last three financial years, our capital expenditures were used primarily to optimize and maintain our Sichuan polysilicon factory, to maintain our cell and module manufacturing plant in Yixing, Jiangsu Province, to purchase production equipment, to acquire land-use rights for each of the plants and to build up our horizontal solar power productsproduct business and solar power projects businesses.business. After the completion of our business restructuring in September 2017, our capital expenditures will be used primarily for our solar power projects business. For details of our capital expenditures, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects–Prospects¾B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures.”

 

B.Business Overview

 

We arewere a fully integrated solar project developer and operator.

41

Prior to September 2017, we were a leading global brandfully-integrated solar project developer and technology provider of energy-efficient products based in China. Capitalizing on our proprietary technologies, economies of scale, low cost production capabilities, technical innovations and know-how and leveraging our in-house polysilicon, wafer and module manufacturing capabilities, we provide our customers withWe provided high quality, cost competitive solar power products, including solar wafers, solar cells, solar modules and processing services. We provide high quality solar power productsprojects, to a global network of suppliers and customers, which includesincluded leading global manufacturers of solar wafers, cells and modules and distributors, installers and end users of solar modules.

We have significantly expanded our business scope from being primarily a solar wafer manufacturer to becoming a manufacturer of polysilicon and solar modules. Starting from early 2014, we began to expand into the global energy efficient products and services business, as well as downstream solar power projects in overseas markets. We believe our vertically integrated model and integrated manufacturing capabilities allow us to ensure the quality of our solar power products and reduce our reliance on the quality assurances of third-party suppliers. Moreover, our vertical integration allows us to gain an early understanding of trends in PV product pricing, better anticipate market conditions and take advantage of market opportunities more quickly and efficiently.

We have greatly expanded our manufacturing capacity since we began the production of solar wafers. We believe we possess one of the largest solar wafer manufacturing facilities in China based on production capacity as of December 31, 2015.

We sell solar wafers primarily to solar cell and module manufacturers globally. In 2015, a significant portion of our wafer sales were made to companies based in Asia, primarily to leading solar cell and module companies in China, South Korea, India and Singapore. The majority of our module sales in 2015 were made to distributors across the globe including distributors in Europe, the United States and the Asia-Pacific region. We have begun to refine our module sales strategy to sell directly to end users in order to enhance our pricing power and increase our profit margin. We believe that one of the most cost-effective and innovative ways to improve module efficiencies is through enhanced wafer technologies, an area where we have historical expertise. In addition, we have continued to focus on implementing various cost reduction programs and have reduced our silicon consumption rate and non-silicon wafer processing costs.

At the end of 2012, we started to implement our business strategy to transform our business focus from solar wafer manufacturing to module manufacturing. The shift in our business focus was completed in 2013. In July 2013, we were promoted to “Tier 1” status on the PV Module Maker Tier System published by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, or BNEF. According to BNEF, tier 1 module manufacturers are those that have provided products to three different projects, which have received non-recourse financing by three different banks in the past two years. In connection with this business transformation, we have implemented strategic initiatives including increasing the volume of our module sales and the size of our marketing team. As of December 31, 2015, our in-house module manufacturing capacity was 1.2 GW. In the past, we sourced part of our modules from overseas OEM located in various regions including Europe, South Asia and the Asia-Pacific region to allow us to provide a greater volume of solar modules without incurring additional significant capital expenditures. Since 2015, as the cost of OEM became higher than our in-house manufacturing, we have significantly reduced our current overseas OEM module capacity and plan to cease the overseas module OEM arrangements in the first half of 2016. In 2016, we plan to maintain our current in-house module manufacturing capacity. We may resume the module OEM arrangements in the future if our module business requires and subject to market conditions. We believe that our globalized structure enables us to quickly adapt to changes in demand as a result of market forces or changes in trade policies. We also believe that continued investment in establishing a global network has attracted new customers and improved industry recognition of our solar products.


In 2013, 2014 and 2015, we shipped 3,218.0 MW, 2,878.2 MW and 2,748.8 MW, respectively, of solar power products.

Starting from early 2014, we began to expand our operations into the broader energy efficient products and services business and into downstream solar power projects. While we remain focused on our retail and residential-oriented business development, we selectively pursue high quality and low-risk solar power project opportunities, especially distributed generation projects, and have been building our new solar portfolio comprised of those projects, in the United Kingdom, North America, Japan, and other emerging markets. In 2015, we sold three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 57.5 MW in the United Kingdom and three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 1.8 MW in Japan. We also entered into sales agreements in connection with the sale of one utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 13.5 MW in the United Kingdom in 2015. For details of our project development pipeline, see “Item 4. Information on the Company¾B. Business Overview—Solar Power Project Development.”

Our net revenues increased from $1,519.6 million in 2013 to $1,561.5 million in 2014 and decreased to $1,282.0 million in 2015. We recorded an operating income of $29.3 million and a net loss of $5.1 million in 2015, compared to an operating income of $8.2 million and a net loss of $33.6 million in 2014, and an operating loss of $221.4 million and a net loss of $258.9 million in 2013. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects¾A. Operating Results¾Overview of Financial Results¾Net Revenues” for a breakdown of our total revenues by products and by geographic markets.

Our Products and Services

We offeroffered monocrystalline and multicrystalline wafers of various sizes and thicknesses. Inthicknesses, and in wafer manufacturing, we arewere capable of slicing wafers with a thickness less than 180 microns on a large scale. We also offeroffered wafer processing services to certain customers.

We offer In addition, we offered monocrystalline and multicrystalline solar modules. We currently producemodules and we produced standard solar monocrystalline modules ranging from 75270 W to 320350 W and multicrystalline modules ranging from 130260 W to 315340 W in power output, built to general specifications for use in a wide range of residential, commercial, industrial and other solar power generation systems. We are gradually switching our focus from big-scale utilitywere also a manufacturer of polysilicon. In September 2017, we exited the manufacturing businesses through a non-cash restructuring.

In early 2014, we expanded into the global energy efficient products and services business and downstream solar power projects toin overseas markets. Since then, we have focused on small-scale DG projects, specifically commercial and residential rooftop projects. Withprojects, with a few small-scale utility projects and community solar gardens, in stable, mature, conservative country risk profile markets with attractive subsidies. After the completion of our brand recognition, local warehousesbusiness restructuring in September 2017, we have transformed into a solar project developer and on-site technical support, we are providing retail customersoperator, a pure downstream player with integrated solar services and solutions.

robust pipeline projects around the world. We develop build and sell solar power projects. While we remain focused on our retailprojects or sell project SPVs (project development business), and residential-oriented business development, we selectively pursue high qualityown and low-riskoperate solar power project opportunities, especially distributed generation projects and have been buildingsell the electricity generated by our newoperated solar portfolio comprised of thosepower plants (IPP business). While the project development business continues to be our important strategy for the foreseeable future, we also intend to retain some projects in selected regions and become an IPP. The IPP business is especially attractive, due to the United Kingdom, North America, Japan, and other emerging markets.resulting high margin recurring revenue. Over time, we may intend to shift a meaningful amount of our revenue to recurring power sales.

 

Manufacturing

We manufacture solar-grade polysilicon, solar wafers, cells and modules.

We significantly expanded our manufacturing capacity since we began our production of solar wafers. We believe we operate one of the largest solar wafer manufacturing facilities in China based on production capacity. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had an annual wafer manufacturing capacity of approximately 2,400completed 564 MW consisting of a monocrystalline wafer manufacturing capacity of approximately 200 MW and a multicrystalline wafer manufacturing capacity of approximately 2,200 MW. Our annual wafer manufacturing capacity as of December 31, 2015 increased from the 2,000 MW annual wafer manufacturing capacity as of December 31, 2014 through our technology improvement. We plan to further expand our annual wafer manufacturing capacity in 2016 through technology improvement.

We began selling solar modules in June 2009 after our acquisition of ReneSola Jiangsu. As of December 31, 2015, we maintained our cell and module manufacturing capacities of 240 MW and 1,200 MW, respectively, the same capacities we had as of December 31, 2013 and 2014. We currently have OEM factories and facilities located in Japan and Poland with a total annual OEM module capacity of approximately 170 MW. Since 2015, as the cost of OEM became higher than our in-house manufacturing, we have significantly reduced our current overseas OEM module capacity and plan to cease the overseas module OEM arrangements in the first half of 2016. In 2016, we plan to maintain our current in-house module manufacturing capacity.


We had an annual polysilicon manufacturing capacity of 6,000 metric tons, 6,000 metric tons and 6,000 metric tons as of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. We ramped up our polysilicon manufacturing facility in Meishan, Sichuan Province, in two phases. Phase I of our polysilicon facility had been in full operation since the beginning of 2011 and Phase II of the facility was completed in June 2013. In November 2012, we halted polysilicon production to upgrade our facilities and equipment, as well as integrate Phase II with Phase I. At the end of September 2013, we concluded that our efforts to sufficiently reduce the cost of polysilicon production as compared to the prevailing market price were not successful. After conducting a further internal assessment we determined that it was no longer feasible to operate the Phase I facility without incurring a loss and to recognize the impairment charge in our wafer segment accordingly. Production at the Phase I facility was permanently discontinued in October 2013. Our remaining Phase II polysilicon facility currently has an annual manufacturing capacity of 6,000 metric tons and was running at full capacity and helped to contribute positively to our cash flows in 2015.

While the solar sector remains highly competitive, we believe that our continuing investments in new technologies will support our longer-term goals.

The following table sets forth the manufacturing capacities of our facilities.

Manufacturing
Facilities

Annual
Manufacturing
Capacity as of
December 31, 
2013(1)

Annual
Manufacturing
Capacity as of
December 31, 
2014(2)

Annual
Manufacturing
Capacity as of
December 31, 
2015(3)

Expected
Manufacturing
Capacity as of
December 31,
2016(3)

Wafer2,000 MW2,000 MW2,400 MW2,900 MW
—Monocrystalline Wafers200 MW200 MW200 MW200 MW
—Multicrystalline Wafers1,800 MW1,800 MW2,200 MW2,700 MW
Cell240 MW240 MW240 MW240 MW
Module1,200 MW1,200 MW1,200 MW1,200 MW
Polysilicon6,000 metric tons6,000 metric tons6,000 metric tons6,000 metric tons

(1)Calculated based on the adjusted methodology effective January 1, 2013, which is based on an efficiency rate of 19.0% for monocrystalline wafers and 17.8% for multicrystalline wafers.

(2)Calculated based on the adjusted methodology effective January 1, 2014, which is based on an efficiency rate of 19.2% for monocrystalline wafers and 17.8% for multicrystalline wafers.

(3)Calculated based on the adjusted methodology effective January 1, 2015, which is based on an efficiency rate of 19.5% for monocrystalline wafers and 18.35% for multicrystalline wafers.

We selectively use automation to enhance the quality and consistency of our finished products and improve efficiency in our manufacturing processes. All of our current monocrystalline furnaces were purchased from Chinese and Chinese-foreign joint venture solar power equipment suppliers in order to lower our equipment procurement, transportation and installation costs. Most of our multicrystalline furnances, all of our current squaring machines and our other major equipment are sourced from overseas.

Prior to 2011, we purchased most of our multicrystalline furnaces from foreign equipment suppliers. In 2011, we began to collaborate with domestic equipment makers in China to develop customized multicrystalline furnaces. In 2012, we devised new methods which allowed us to increase the capacity of our existing multicrystalline furnaces. Our new multicrystalline furnaces require substantially less capital expenditure than imported furnaces and offer improved production efficiency and lower electricity consumption.


Our manufacturing capacities comprise the following:

·polysilicon production;

·ingot production;

·wafer slicing;

·cell manufacturing; and

·module manufacturing.

Polysilicon Production

We use the modified Siemens process to produce polysilicon. Our manufacturing process is able to recover and recycle exhaust gases throughout the process in our closed-loop manufacturing system.

In phase I of our polysilicon manufacturing facility, we adopt TCS production and thermal hydrogenation process. In phase II of our polysilicon manufacturing facility, we use a hydrochlorination process which requires less power consumption compared to our phase I technology.

We integrated the two phases into one combined polysilicon manufacturing facility in October 2012. At the end of September 2013, we concluded that our efforts to sufficiently reduce the cost of polysilicon production as compared to the prevailing market price were not successful. After conducting a further internal assessment we determined that it was no longer feasible to operate the Phase I facility without incurring a loss and to recognize the impairment charge in our wafer segment accordingly. Production at the Phase I facility was permanently discontinued in October 2013. Our polysilicon facility currently has an annual polysilicon manufacturing capacity of 6,000 metric tons. After eliminating our Phase I facility, our remaining in-house polysilicon production is cost-efficient as compared to the prevailing market price of polysilicon, which we believe will help our overall profitability. In addition, we believe the discontinuation will help reduce our power consumption and depreciation and therefore help to enhance our profitability going forward. As of December 31, 2015, our remaining Phase II facility was running at full capacity and helped to contribute positively to our cash flows in 2015. While the solar sector remains highly competitive, we believe that our continuing investments in new technologies will support our longer-term goals.

Ingot Production/Wafer Slicing

To produce multicrystalline ingots, molten polysilicon is converted into block-form through a casting process in the multicrystalline furnaces. Crystallization starts by gradually cooling the crucibles in order to create multicrystalline ingot blocks. The resulting ingot blocks consist of multiple smaller crystals as opposed to the single crystal of a monocrystalline ingot. The output of a multicrystalline furnace is higher than that of a monocrystalline furnace.

To produce monocrystalline ingots, we place polysilicon into a quartz crucible in a furnace, where the polysilicon is melted. Then, a thin crystal seed is dipped into the molten silicon to determine the crystal orientation. The seed is rotated and then slowly extracted from the molten silicon to form a single crystal as the molten silicon and crucible cool. Once the single crystals have been grown to pre-determined specifications, they are surface-ground to produce ingots. The uniform properties of a single crystal promote the conductivity of electrons, thus yielding higher conversion efficiencies. We have developed a proprietary method for producing more ingots in one heating and cooling cycle by adding silicon raw materials during the melting process. This innovation enables us to increase our yield of ingots, reduce electricity cost and enhance the utilization rate of furnaces and consumables, such as crucibles.

To produce multicrystalline wafers, multicrystalline ingots are first cut into pre-determined sizes. After a testing process, the multicrystalline ingots are cropped and the usable parts of the ingots are sliced into wafers by wire saws using high-precision cutting techniques. After a cleaning and drying process, the wafers are inspected, packed and shipped.

To produce monocrystalline wafers, monocrystalline ingots are squared by squaring machines after being inspected. Through high-precision cutting techniques, the squared ingots are then sliced into wafers by wire saws using steel wires and silicon carbon powder. After inserting into frames, the wafers are cleaned to remove debris from the previous processes and then dried. Finally, the wafers are inspected before they are packed in boxes and shipped to customers.


Cell Production

A solar cell is made from a silicon wafer that converts sunlight into electricity by a process known as the PV effect. Thus, the feedstock of solar cell manufacturing is solar wafers, which are used as the base substrate. The process starts with cleaning and texturing the surface of a wafer, followed by a diffusion process in which an emitter is formed. The front and back sides of the wafer are isolated using the plasma etching technique, and the oxide formed during the diffusion process is removed to form an electrical field. An anti-reflective coating is then applied to the surface of the cell using plasma enhanced chemical vapors to enhance the absorption of sunlight. The front and back sides of the cell are screen printed with metallic inks and the cell then undergoes a fire treatment in order to preserve its mechanical and electrical properties. The cell is then tested and classified in accordance with its parameters.

Module Production

Solar modules are arrays of interconnected solar cells encased in a weatherproof frame. Solar modules are assembled from interconnected multiple solar cells by taping and stringing the cells into a desired electrical configuration. The interconnected cells are laid out, laminated in a vacuum, cured by heating and then packaged in a protective light-weight aluminum frame. Solar modules are then sealed and weatherproofed to withstand high levels of ultraviolet radiation and moisture.

Solar Power Project Development

We develop, build, operate and sell solar power projects. Our solar power project development activities have expanded through organic growth starting from 2011. We began to record revenue from sales of solar power projects, including 270 MW new installation in 2015. We are currently operating two utility-scaleChina (including EPC service). In 2017, we sold and delivered 109.4 MW of solar power projects of approximately 15.4 MW in Romania,projects; and record electricity generation revenue from these projects.

In 2015, we sold three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 57.5 MW in the United Kingdom and three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 1.8 MWin Japan. We also entered into sales agreements in connection with the sale of one utility-scale26.7 MW additional solar power projects. We were operating approximately 212 MW solar power projects totaling approximately 13.5globally as of December 31, 2017, including 187 MW in China, and recorded electricity generation revenue from these projects. As of December 31, 2017, we had 546 MW late-stage pipeline, including 125 MW in China, with commercial operation date, or COD, within 2018 and 2019, of which 92.2 MW of the solar power projects were under construction.

Our net revenues from continuing operations decreased from $116.3 million in 2015 to $80.5 million in 2016 and increased to $103.0 million in 2017. We recorded an operating income of $6.6 million and a net income of $34.5 million in 2017, compared to an operating income of $2.3 million and a net loss of $34.7 million in 2016 and an operating income of $16.3 million and a net loss of $5.1 million in 2015. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects¾A. Operating Results¾Overview of Financial Results¾Net Revenues”.

Our Business

Our business primarily includes the sale of project SPVs or development and sale of solar power projects as a developer and the sale of electricity generated by the solar power projects operated by us as an IPP.

Project Development Business

We started our solar power project development business in early 2014. We have recorded revenue from continuing operations from the sales of solar power projects since 2015. We have focused on small-scale DG projects, specifically commercial projects, with a few in small-scale utility projects and community solar gardens, in stable, mature, conservative country risk profile markets, including China, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, other developed countries with infrastructure upgrade needs and emerging countries in 2015Southeast Asia, with attractive subsidies. See “⸺Our Sales and Customers.”

As a developer, we have two basic project development models.

·Build-Transfer: we develop and build, or contract out wholly or partially to another party to build and develop, the solar power projects, which will be sold and delivered after being connected on grid.

42

·Project Rights Sale: we involve in earlier development stages to secure land/roof with interconnection capacity and leverage the expertise of global project development teams to sell project rights at “notice to proceed”, or NTP, with attractive margin by selling project SPVs, which hold the early-to-late stage pipelines, before commencing the construction work of the solar power projects which we develop, acquire or develop jointly with other parties.

Besides the two basic models, we develop community solar gardens as developers and hold the community solar gardens through project SPVs. Prior to the delivery of the community solar gardens, SPVs enter into PPAs, which generally have a term of 20 years, with the power subscribers. After investors are found, we will sell the project rights, that is, the project SPV holding the community solar gardens, to the investors.

The prices of our solar power projects or projects SPVs are primarily based on the cash flow such projects can generate and the rate of returns. The cash flow can be affected by drivers such as electricity generation, electricity price (such as FiT or PPA), operating expenses, depreciation method, tax policy or for a number of other reasons. Investors may compare the rate of returns generated from the solar power projects with the rate of returns in the financing or investment markets. See “Item 3. Key Information⸺D. Risk Factors⸺Risks Related to Our Business⸺Volatility or large decrease in the prices of solar power project may cause significant fluctuations or declines in our revenue.”

Purchasers of our developed solar power projects normally pay the purchase price in stages. Substantially all of these purchasers may require us to provide retention money, performance bond or bank guarantee for a certain period of time to secure the quality and performance of our developed solar power projects. During the covered period of time, if any significant defects or efficiency problem arises from sold solar power projects, it may cause the retention money to be deducted or forfeited.

The project development business continues to be our important strategy for the foreseeable future.

Engineering, Procurement and Construction Business

Our Engineering, Procurement and Construction Business (“EPC”) includes engineering design, procurement of solar modules, balance-of-system components and other components, and construction contracting and management. We may engage our in-house EPC team or engage external experienced and qualified EPC contractors to handle and monitor the EPC process for our developed projects. Despite that, as the developer, we may procure the key components, such as solar modules and balance-of-system components.

We typically enter into short-term contracts with our suppliers and contractors on project-by-project basis or project portfolio basis based on the market prices.

Engineering

Through engineering design, we aim to reduce the risks, reduce the costs and improve the performance of our solar power projects. The engineering design process includes the site layout and the electrical design as well as assessing a variety of factors to choose an appropriate technology and the modules and inverters in particular. In additional to relying on our in-house EPC team, we may engage independent third party EPC contractors to conduct and monitor this process.

Procurement

We procure solar modules and other key components for our developed solar power projects primarily by entering into short-term contracts to purchase at market prices. Suppliers of our solar modules and key components are primarily our related parties and third-party suppliers and contractors. Our purchasing decisions may take into consideration of technical specifications (including size, type and power output) bid price, warranty and insurance programs, spectral response, performance in low light, nominal power tolerance levels, degradation rate, technical support and the reputation of the supplier. We generally require warranties for defects in materials or workmanship for the components and a warranty for module capacity under normal testing conditions. Our in-house EPC team or external EPC contractors work in areas such as logistics, installation, construction and supervision. We maintain an updated list of qualified and reliable suppliers and third-party contractors with a proven track record with which we have established relationships. We choose our third-party suppliers and contractors through a bidding or quotation request process or through our affiliates or other cooperative arrangements with various manufacturers and contractors. The relevant departments of our local offices organize and collect bids/quotations, communicate with potential suppliers and contractors and coordinate with our local development teams to meet the local technical and legal requirements.

43

Construction

We engage third-party contractors for construction. We employ a number of measures to manage and monitor the performance of such contractors in terms of both quality and delivery time and to ensure compliance with the applicable safety and other requirements. For example, we generally have on-site supervisors and hold regular on-site meetings with the third-party contractors to monitor their work to ensure that projects progress according to schedule and adhere to quality standards. We also conduct periodic inspections to examine project implementation and quality standards compared to our project planning and prepare periodic reports for review and approval by the relevant departments in our corporate headquarters. If we identify any quality or progress issues which are attributable to the work of the third-party contractors, we will have further follow-up discussions with the third party contractors and monitor their rectification work.

We also require our third-party contractors for construction and installation to comply with applicable laws and regulations regarding work safety as well as our own production safety rules and policies. We examine and keep records of the production-related safety documentation and insurance policies of our third-party contractors. All production-related tools and equipment used by our third party contractors must be compliant with and certified by applicable regulatory standards. Our third-party contractors should also regularly provide their internal records relating to production safety (for example safety production training and safety inspections) to us, and we also conduct regular safety supervision and inspection on the third-party contractors.

Under our third-party contracting agreements, we are generally entitled to compensation if the third-party contractors fail to meet the prescribed requirements and deadlines under their contracting agreements. In general, our contractors require us to pay all of the contract price upon completion of the solar power projects and we require the contractor to provide a performance bond, which is usually for a period of one year to two years, in respect of the warranty obligations.

Commissioning and Warranties

When the EPC contractor notifies the regional solar power project team of on-grid operation, the regional solar power project team thoroughly tests each aspect of the solar power project. Commissioning tests generally include a detailed visual inspection of all significant aspects of the plant, an open circuit voltage test and short circuit current test prior to grid connection, and a direct-current test after connecting to the power grid. These tests are conducted in order to ensure that the plant is structurally and electrically safe, and is sufficiently robust to operate as designed for the specified project lifetime. We have not experienced any material delays in construction or unsatisfactory workmanship with respect to our solar power projects. Following the commissioning, the solar power projects, which are intended for sale, will be handed over to the purchasers.

In addition to the warranties provided by the manufacturers of modules, balance-of-system components and other key components, EPC contractors also typically provide a limited warranty against defects in workmanship, engineering design, and installation services under normal use and service conditions for a period of time following the energizing of a section of a solar power plant or upon substantial completion of the entire solar power plant. In resolving claims under the workmanship, design and installation warranties, the new owner has the option of remedying the defect to the warranted level through repair, refurbishment, or replacement.

IPP Business

We started our IPP business by owning and operating solar power projects in 2014 and selling electricity generated by these solar power projects in 2014. We have tried to build our business as an IPP to develop and operate DG projects in well-developed regions for high PPA/FIT users and avoid regions with subsidy delay or curtailment issue.

We primarily conduct our IPP business in China where we can sell electricity in gross metering or net metering. In China, our IPP portfolio is the solar power projects which we developed. Since 2016, we are building our in-house O&M team in China to operate and maintain all of our owned and operated IPP portfolio in China.

44

In China, NEA and NDRC published the Notice on the Pilot of Distributed Generation Traded in Markets (file 2017-1901) to establish electricity trading market for DG projects which are similar to virtual net metering and US community solar gardens, allowing the IPP one of following:

·to sell electricity to users directly, eligible for solar premium, and pay wheeling cost to the grid;

·to sell electricity indirectly where the grid operators will arrange the sales, eligible for solar premium, and pay only wheeling cost to the grid; or

·to sell electricity to the grid at national solar FIT price, and subtract corresponding transmission cost;

Under gross metering, all solar projects approved by the National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, are eligible to receive an attractive fixed FIT for 20 years in principle and we expect our solar power projects to be long-term contracted assets. Therefore, we can sell all electricity generated by our gross metering projects to the State Grid and receive a total amount of FIT amount, which comprise an agreed electricity sales price from the State Grid and the subsidies from the government, for 20 years. Net metering is important to achieve grid parity. We develop and operate net metering DG projects in well-developed regions in China. Under net metering, we sell majority of the electricity to non-State Grid power purchasers at an agreed negotiated electricity sales price, which is usually at a market discount rate of the public retail rate, and then sell the remaining unpurchased electricity to the State Grid at a price based on the local desulphurized coal benchmark. Aside from the electricity sale, each KWh of electricity generated (sold to non-Sate Grid power purchasers or State Grid) will receive subsidies from the government. State Grid is an enterprise which constructs and operates power grids and is a pilot state holding company approved by the State Council of China to carry out state-authorized investment. The non-State Grid power purchasers are primarily commercial and industrial users. See “⸻Our Solar Power Projects.” The governmental subsidies in gross metering and net metering may be different. We have focused and will continue to focus on net metering projects with high equity return.

In our IPP business, power purchasers may pay us monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly or half-yearly based on the terms in the Energy Management Contract (EMCs) and PPAs. The EMCs, which, among others, provide the terms and pricing of the sales and include the PPAs, are long-term, generally 20 years with a possible 5 year extension. See “Item 3. Key Information⸺D. Risk Factors⸺Risks related to Our Business⸺Our ability to transmit and sell the electricity generated from the solar power projects operated by us relies on the grid connection, dispatch agreements, PPAs and other contractual agreements.”

As of February 28, 2018, we had more than 80 solar power projects in operation globally with an aggregate capacity of approximately 212 MW. See “⸻Our Solar Power Projects.”

While the project development business continues to be our important strategy for the foreseeable future, we also intend to retain more DG projects in China and become an IPP. The IPP business is especially attractive, due to the resulting high margin recurring revenue.

Our Solar Power Projects

We have built our business as project developer and have selectively owned high quality projects. We have focused on small-scale DG projects and community solar gardens with individual project size of less than 5 MW. While we have demonstrated our ability to sell solar power projects globally, we intend to retain some projects in China and become an IPP. Our competitive advantages lie in small-scale projects with high PPA/FIT price in diversified jurisdictions which we believe are of attractive return and will be the trend for the development of the industry.

Projects for Sale

As of December 31, 2017, we completed 564 MW of solar power projects, including 270 MW new installation in China (including EPC service). In 2017, we sold and delivered 109.4 MW of solar power projects; and entered into a sales agreementagreements in connection with the sale of two utility-scale26.7 MW additional solar power projects. We were operating approximately 212 MW solar power projects totaling approximately 9.7globally as of December 31, 2017, including 187 MW in BulgariaChina, and recorded electricity generation revenue from these projects. As of December 31, 2017, we had 546 MW late-stage pipeline, including 125 MW in March 2016. InChina, with commercial operation date, or COD, within 2018 and 2019, of which 92.2 MW of the first quarter of 2016, we completed construction of and connected three additional utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 20were under construction.

45

Operating Assets

As of December 31, 2017, we owned over 212 MW of solar power projects globally in the United Kingdom, which we have received letteroperation, including 187 MW solar power projects in China, and generated 54.45 million kilowatt-hour, or kWh, of intentelectricity from potential purchasers.this IPP portfolio in China.

Operating AssetsCapacity (MW)
China DG
- Zhejiang & Shanghai66.7
- Anhui29.6
- Henan57.9
- Jiangsu8.6
- Hebei17.1
- Shangdong7.4
Total in China187.3
Romania15.4
United Kingdom9.3
Total212.0

Project Pipeline

 

Our solar power projects pipeline includes early- to mid-stage projects pipeline and late-stagelate stage projects pipeline.  Due to different processes of developing projects in various regions, our early- to mid-stage projects pipeline refers to projects that we have internally approved to commit operational or financial resources to develop, including projects that we have conducted internal studies and are bidding for, that we are developing the financing plans, or working to obtain external approval or permits for such projects, or that we have agreed on preliminary terms or entered into MOUs.memorandum of understandings. Late-stage projects pipeline refers to thoseinclude (i) projects that we have the legal right to develop pursuantbased on definitive agreements, including the projects held by project SPVs or joint ventured project SPVs whose controlling power belongs to definitive agreements. us, or can be purchased by us once the late stage is reached and (ii) projects for which PPA or FIT has been arranged, and expect to be connected to the grid or sold (including project rights sale) within 2 years. 

As of April 15, 2016,December 31, 2017, we had (i) a late-stage solar power project pipeline in China, the United States, Canada, Turkey, Poland and Hungary with an aggregate capacity of approximately 171.5546 MW in the United States, the United Kingdomwith estimated COD within 2018 and Japan. We had2019, of which 92.2 MW are under construction, and (ii) an early- to mid-stage solar power projects pipeline in the United States, Canada, Spain, Poland, Canada, TurkeyHungary, South Korea and the United KingdomChina with an aggregate estimated capacity of approximately 449.5 MW. Our team of experts of the solar power projects specializes in project development, evaluations, system design, engineering, project management and coordination and organizing financing.1.1 GW.

 

The following table sets forth the information of all of our projects and late-stage pipeline as of April 15, 2016December 31, 2017 (excluding sold and delivered projects):


Project Location

Project Pipeline (Late Stage)

China Total Capacity (MW)Status
Romania6.0Operating
Romania9.4Operating125.5 MW, of which 28.3 MW are under construction
United States 188.4 MW, of which 30.9 MW are under construction
Canada91.2518.8 MW, of which 8.6 MW are under construction
Turkey120.4 MW(1), of which 10.4 MW are under construction
Poland55.0 MW, of which 14.0 MW are under construction
Hungary

38.4 MW, of which no MW are under construction

Total546.5 MW, of which 92.2 MW are under construction

(1)We have an arrangement with a local partner,UCK Group, under whichUCK Group holds and maintains full titles to all projects but we have the right to receive 50% proceeds generated by the projects.

The following tables set forth our late-stage project pipeline by location:

46

China

In China, as of December 31, 2017, we had a late-stage pipeline of 125.5 MW, 28.3 MW of which are under construction.

Late-stage PipelineCapacity (MW)  Late-stage pipelineBusiness Model
United Kingdom- Zhejiang and Shanghai  50.3269.1  Late-stage pipelineIPP
Japan- Fujian & Guangdong  29.915.1  Late-stage pipelineIPP
- Jiangsu14.0IPP
- Anhui7.0IPP
- Henan5.1IPP
- Shandong15.2IPP
China Total125.5

United States

In the United States, as of December 31, 2017, we had a late-stage pipeline of 188.4 MW, 30.9 MW of which are under construction.

Late-stage

Pipeline

Projects

 Location 

Capacity

(MW)

  PPA/FIT 

Term

(Year)

 Off-Taker 

Start

Date

 COD Business Model
NC-North NC  6.8  PPA 15 Dominion 2017 Q3 2018 Q1 Project Development
RP-NC NC  24.1  PPA 15 NC EMC 2017Q3 2018 Q2 Project Development
Utah UT  10.7  PPA 20 Corporate 2018 Q2 2018 Q4 Project Development
RP-MN MN  37.5  PPA 25 Community/ Municipal/ C&I 2018 Q2 2018 Q4 -2019 Q1 Project Development
New York NY  7.7  PPA TBD Community/ Municipal/ C&I 2018 Q2 2018 Q4 Project Development
RP-CA CA  13.6  PPA 20 PG&E / Other 2018 Q3 2019 Project Development
Oregon OR  23.0  PPA TBD TBD 2019 2019 Project Development
Alpine TX  65.0    TBD TBD 2019 2019 Project Development
Total    188.4             

Canada

In Canada, as of December 31, 2017, we had a late-stage pipeline of 18.8 MW projects.

Late-stage

Pipeline

Projects

 Location 

Capacity

(MW)

  PPA/FIT 

Term

(Year)

 Start Date COD Business Model
FIT3 Ontario  8.6  FIT3 20 2017 Q4 2018 Q3 Project Development
FIT4 Ontario  10.2  FIT4 20 2018 2019 Project Development
Total    18.8           

Turkey

In Turkey, as of December 31, 2017, we had a late-stage pipeline of 120.4 MW. Our operation in Turkey is different from other regions. Instead of holding projects directly by our subsidiaries, we reached an agreement with a local partner, UCK group, according to which UCK group holds all these projects while we are entitled to receive 50% proceeds from revenues generated by these projects.

47

Project Portfolios

(as of Dec 31, 2017)

 

Capacity

(MW)

  PPA/FIT Term
(Year)
  

Start

Date

  COD  Business Model
İzmir Aliağa  4.6  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
İzmir Menemen  4.6  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
İzmir Menemen  8.0  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Manisa Salihli  8.0  FIT  10   2017   2018 Q1  Project Development
İzmir Kınık  4.6  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Manisa Alaşehir  4.6  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
İzmir Bergama  4.6  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
İzmir Bergama  2.3  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
İzmir Kınık  6.9  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Balıkesir Altıeylül  5.7  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Balıkesir Altıeylül  1.1  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Manisa Ahmetli  5.7  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Manisa Gölmarmara  19.5  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Denizli Bozkurt  3.4  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
İzmir Aliağa  2.3  FIT  10   2017   2018 Q1  Project Development
İzmir Aliağa  3.8  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
İzmir Kınık  20.7  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Manisa Kula  6.9  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
BilecikMerkez  2.0  FIT  10   2018   2018  Project Development
Total  120.4                 

Poland

In Poland, as of December 31, 2017, we had a late-stage pipeline of 55.0 MW projects.

Late-stage Pipeline

Projects

 

Capacity

(MW)

  PPA/FIT 

Term

(Year)

 Start Date COD Business Model
13 individual projects, 1 MW each  13  FIT (CfD)(1) 15 2017 Q2 2018 Q2 Project Development
42 individual projects, 1 MW each  42  FIT (CfD) 15 2018 Q2(2) 2018 Q4 Project Development
Total  55.0           

(1)       “CfD” refers to contract for difference.

(2)       1 MW is under construction. Together with the 13 MW individual projects under construction listed above, there are in total of 14 MW projects are under construction

Hungary

In Hungary, as of December 31, 2017, we had a late-stage pipeline of 38.4 MW.

Late-stage
Pipeline Projects
 

Capacity

(MW)

  PPA/FIT Term NTP COD Business
Model
Portfilio of “Micro PPs”, 0.5 MW each  38.4  FIT 25 2018 Q2 2018 Q4 Project Development
Total  38.4           

Other Geographies

 

As of MarchDecember 31, 2016,2017, we also had an early- to mid-stage windsolar power project pipeline of approximately 20 MW in Poland.Spain, South Korea and India.

 

Raw Materials

48

 

The key raw material for our wafer manufacturing is polysilicon. Currently, we use polysilicon as primary feedstock to produce solar wafers. In 2015, polysilicon accounted for approximately 34.0% of our wafer production cost. We procure our raw materials from diversified sources. In 2015, purchases from international suppliers, domestic suppliers and our subsidiary, Sichuan ReneSola, accounted for approximately 34.0%, 7.6% and 58.4%, respectively, of our total polysilicon purchases. Other raw materials include crucibles, slurry, wires, glass and ethyl vinyl acetate, or EVA, film, which we procure primarily from domestic and international suppliers. For the volatility of raw material prices, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Volatile market and industry trends, in particular, unfavorable changes in supply or demand for solar power products throughout the value chain, and continued substantial downward pressure on the prices of our products will have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.”

Our top five external suppliers of polysilicon, excluding those for processing services, collectively accounted for 94.2% of our total polysilicon purchases in 2015. In September 2010, we entered into a long-term supply contract for polysilicon with a Korean supplier for an initial term of five years ended December 31, 2015. In December 2015, we extended this contract for another two years ending December 31, 2017. Our top two suppliers of polysilicon, excluding those processing services, accounted for more than 86.6% of our total polysilicon purchases in 2015. We are required to purchase approximately $1,291 millionof polysilicon over the next year. The price is subject to adjustment to reflect the prevailing market price at the transaction dates. We made advance payments to these suppliers under the polysilicon purchasing agreements. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, due to the worldwide oversupply of silicon raw materials, we were not required to make advance payments for other newly signed procurement agreements with suppliers. Except for the long-term supply contract extended in December 2015, we did not enter into any other long-term contracts with suppliers between 2013 and 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding advance payments in connection with our procurement agreements amounted to approximately $18.5 million.

We complement our existing long-term and short-term polysilicon purchase agreements with in-house manufacturing capacity provided by our polysilicon manufacturing facility in Meishan, Sichuan Province. Our polysilicon facility currently has an annual polysilicon manufacturing capacity of 6,000 metric tons.

Sales and Customers

We have established a number of long-term relationships with several key players in the solar power industry and will continue to both strengthen our existing customer relationships and cultivate new relationships. Our current customers include some of the leading global manufacturers of solar cells and solar modules. We have been expanding our customer base beyond China and, as of December 31, 2015, sold more than 76.6% of our products, in terms of sales revenue, in overseas markets (outside of China, Taiwan and Hong Kong) such as Europe, Japan, India, the United States and Australia. We have wide-spread sales channels across different continents including sales offices in Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, Japan, India, Australia, South Africa, Panama and other countries or regions, which provide our customers with local and easily accessible support. In particular, we expanded into the United States and Japan, two fast growing markets for PV products, in mid-2012. In 2015, we further strengthened our market leadership in Europe and Japan. Our revenue derived from sales into Europe was $331.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. We also established subsidiaries and branch offices in Japan, and our revenue derived from sales into Japan was approximately $298.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. We believe that our reputation for quality and reliability and our added capabilities in solar cells and solar modules will enable us to gain market share and capture new growth opportunities in the solar power industry.


We offer our customers after-sales support services such as monthly performance checks on our products. Our research and development, technical management and quality control teams work closely with our customers’ counterparties to address our customers’ requirements.Community Solar Gardens

 

As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had a one-year backlogcommunity solar gardens in Minnesota with the capacity of 201.8 MW contracts for deliveryapproximately 37.5 MW. In 2017, we sold 13.3MW of our Minnesota community solar gardens. Our community solar gardens in 2016.New York are currently in development and are expected to have the size of 7.7 MW.

 

WaferOur Sales

In 2013, we decreased our wafer shipment because we used more of our wafer output for our own module manufacturing to support our business strategy to become an integrated module provider. In 2014 and 2015, we continued to use most of the wafers produced internally.Customers

 

We derived 86.5%, 76.9%selectively pursue high quality and 89.0%low-risk solar power project opportunities, especially DG projects, and have been building our new solar portfolio comprised of our wafer sales from customersthose projects .. We focus on conservative risk portfolio countries and regions where the solar power project markets are growing rapidly and expected to have sustainable growth supported by favorable government policies, including North America, China, Turkey, Poland, Hungary, Spain, France and other emerging markets in China (including Hong Kong) in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. In 2013, our top five wafer customers accounted for approximately 52% of our wafer sales and 10.8% of our net revenues, and our largest wafer customer accounted for approximately 24.8% of our wafer sales and 5.1% of our net revenues. In 2014, our top five wafer customers accounted for approximately 53.7% of our wafer sales and 6.3% of our net revenues, and our largest wafer customer accounted for approximately 16.5% of our wafer sales and 1.9% of our net revenues. In 2015, our top five wafer customers accounted for approximately 49.5% of our wafer sales and 7.6% of our net revenues, and our largest wafer customer accounted for approximately 17.1% of our wafer sales and 2.6% of our net revenues.Southeast Asia.

 

Most ofOur project development business is primarily focused in the North America, China, South Korea Turkey, Poland, Hungary Spain and France. We sell our current wafer sales, particularly our salesdeveloped projects or project SPVs to major customers,purchasers, who primarily include large utility companies, other IPPs that desire to sell the electricity from the projects to local power suppliers or users, and global investors such as asset management funds, pension funds and tax equity investors. Our community solar gardens are made under purchase orders based on the spot market rates. While we are still subject to certain long-term sales contracts, the pricing terms and volumes can be subject to renegotiation in situations where there is substantial market volatility. We also have some short-term sales contracts with some of oursolutions for businesses, government entities, municipalities, schools, hospitals, residential customers, and long-term framework contracts,people looking for saving money on their electricity costs. As of December 31, 2017, we had community solar gardens in development and/or under construction in the United States.

The solar power projects for our IPP business are primarily located in China. In China, we can sell the generated electricity in gross metering to the State Grid, or in net metering to the non-State Grid power purchasers first and the remaining unpurchased electricity to the State Grid. The State Grid is an enterprise which provide for variable pricingconstructs and volume terms.operates power grids and is a pilot state holding company approved by the State Council of China to carry out state-authorized investment.. The non-State Grid power purchasers in the net metering are primarily commercial and industrial end users. In overseas, we sell the generated electricity primarily to the local transmission grid companies, utility companies, government entities, municipalities, community and other commercial and industrial end users.

 

We entered into several long-term sales contracts withexpanded our customers. In June 2008, we entered into an agreement with a globalcustomer base beyond China. We have teams covered major solar power company formarkets such as the supply of approximately 1.5 GW of wafers over an eight-and-a-half-year period beginning in July 2008. In June 2010, we entered into an agreement with a leading solar cell manufacturer to provide approximately 293 MW of multicrystalline wafers from July 2010 to December 2013United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Turkey, Poland, Hungary, France, Spain and approximately 141 MW of monocrystalline wafers from October 2010 to December 2013. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, due to the volatility of polysilicon prices and worldwide oversupply of solar power products, we did not enter into new long-term wafer contracts or wafer processing arrangements with customers. Our long-term wafer contracts accounted for approximately 63.8 MW of wafer shipments, or 5.9% of our total wafer shipments, in 2015.India.

 

Module Sales

Our module shipments were 1.7 GW, 2.0 GW and 1.6 GW in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. In 2013, our module shipment exceeded our wafer shipment for the first time in our company’s history, due to our business strategy of transitioning from a wafer manufacturer to an integrated module manufacturer. Our module shipments continued to exceed our wafer shipments since then.

We sell our modules primarily to distributors and power plant developers. The type of customers we focus on depends largely on the demand in the specific markets. In 2013, our top five module customers accounted for 20.6% of our module sales and 15.1% of our total net revenues, and our largest module customer accounted for approximately 4.6% of our module sales and 3.4% of our net revenues.In 2014, our top five module customers accounted for 28.9% of our module sales and 24.2% of our net revenues, and our largest module customer accounted for approximately 9.3% of our module sales and 7.8% of our net revenues. In 2015, our top five module customers accounted for 31.6% of our module sales and 22.7% of our net revenues, and our largest module customer accounted for approximately 15.8% of our module sales and 11.3% of our net revenues.

We sell our modules mostly through spot orders, short-term contracts with terms of less than one year and framework agreements. The prices for most orders, contracts, and framework agreements are based on the then market prices and trends.

A substantial portion of our sales contracts require our customers to make a prepayment set at a certain percentage of the total contract value to secure future delivery of our products. Many of these contracts require customers to provide bank guarantees or irrevocable letters of credit to support their purchase commitment in absence of prepayment.


For the geographical distribution of our products,projects and the geographical revenues, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Overview of Financial Results—Net Revenues—Geographical Distribution.”

 

Solar Power ProjectsEngineering, Procurement and Construction

EPC includes engineering design, procurement of solar modules, balance-of-system components and other components, and construction contracting and management. We may engage our in-house EPC team or engage external experienced and qualified EPC contractors to handle and monitor the EPC process for our developed projects. Despite that, as the developer, we may procure the key components, such as solar modules and balance-of-system components.

 

We selectively pursue high qualitytypically enter into short-term contracts with our suppliers and low-risk solar powercontractors on project-by-project basis or project opportunities, especially distributed generation projects,portfolio basis based on the market prices. For more details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Business—Engineering, Procurement and Construction Business.”

Operations and Maintenance

Since 2016, we have been building our new solarin-house O&M team in China to operate and maintain all of our owned and operated IPP portfolio comprisedin China. We utilize customized software to monitor the performance and security of those projects, in the United Kingdom, North America, Japan and other emerging markets.

We began to sell solar power projects and recognize revenue from sales ofour solar power projects in a new separate business segment in 2015. In 2015, we sold three utility-scalereal-time basis. We regularly maintain our solar power projects totaling approximately 57.5 MW inwith an intention to maximize the United Kingdomutilization rate, rate of power generation and three utility-scalesystem life of our solar power projects totaling approximately 1.8 MWprojects. We engage on-the-ground contractors who are on-call to promptly remedy any issues that may arise.We generally require warranties for defects in Japan. materials or workmanship for the components and a warranty for module capacity under normal testing conditions.

49

Intellectual Properties

We also entered into sales agreements in connectionrely primarily on trade secrets, employee contractual protections and other contractual restrictions to establish and protect our intellectual properties and proprietary rights. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects⸻C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.⸻Intellectual Property. Nevertheless, these afford only limited protection and the actions we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to provide us with the sale of one utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 13.5 MW in the United Kingdom in 2015.meaningful protection or commercial advantage. See “Item 3. Key Information⸻D. Risks Factors⸻Risks Related to Our revenues from the solar power projects segment accounted for 9.1% ofBusiness⸻Our failure to protect our total net revenues in 2015.intellectual property rights may undermine our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual property rights may be costly.”

 

Quality Control

 

We implementhave a risk control team to conduct comprehensive market due diligence to identify solar projects that have projected internal returns that meet our quality control system at each stage of our manufacturing process, from raw materials procurement to production and delivery, in order to ensure consistent quality for our products. We conduct systematic inspections of incoming raw materials, ranging from silicon raw materials to various consumables, such as crucibles, steel wires and silicon carbon powder.standards. We have formulatedexperienced and adopted guidelines for recycling reclaimable silicon, ingot productionqualified engineering teams and wafer slicing, and continueengage external independent experienced qualified engineering to o develop and improve our inspection measures and standards. Prior to packaging, we conduct a final quality check to ensuredesign the projects with technical specifications that our solar wafers and solar modules meet all our internal standards and customers’ specifications. We received ISO 9001: 2008 certification, valid until September 2018, for our quality assurance system for production, which we believe demonstrates our technological capabilities and instills customer confidence.

We have also received certificationsprovide for the quality and performance of our productssolar power plants. Solar modules used in our solar power projects are from institutions in different countries, including these recent certifications:

·Since 2013, we have been listed by the Japan Photovoltaic Expansion Centerour related parties or third party suppliers and have the certifications and meet test standards. We closely monitor and supervise construction contractors as a qualified PV product manufacturer for the Japanese market and received certification from the Japan Electrical and Environment Technology Laboratories, both of which are significant accomplishments for a foreign company entering Japan’s solar market;

·Since 2012, our Virtus I and Virtus II modules, which are quasi-mono and high-efficiency polycrystalline PV Modules, have been listed by TÜV Rheinland Underwriters Laboratories, Mircrogeneration Certification Scheme,California Energy Commission,China General Certification, and China Quality Certification. We received additional Sello FIDE certification in Mexico in 2014.

·Since 2013, our 355 newly launched LED models have obtained Conformite Europeenne certifications from TÜV SÜD, a globally recognized and leading government-designated certification body responsible for product testing and the certification of electronic products. These certifications are valid for five years.

We also obtained Conformite Europeenne certificates for three categories of our LED products across Europe and Africa, including bulbs, indoor lighting and outdoor lighting.  We currently have approximately 600 models of LED products and have obtained certifications, such as Underwriters Laboratories certificates for North America, CUL certificates for Canada, TUV-CE certificates for the EU, TUV-CB certificates for IECEE member countries, and SAA & RCM certificates for Australia, to indicate that our LED models hold and maintain local electrical safety certificates and comply with the applicable requirements. We expect to obtain additional certification for our various LED products across these regions, as well as certification for other markets, such as Japan and Mexico.

·In the first half of 2013, our microinverter, Micro Replus™, which is most suitable for residential use, obtained certification in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Denmark and the United Kingdom, Belgium, Spain, Greece, Czech, Finland, Norway, Portugal, Holland and France.The certifications include  UL1741, IEEE 1547, FCC for the United States; CSA for  Canada; AS 4777 for Australia & New Zealand; VDE 4105 for Germany; VDE 0126 for Denmark; G83 for the United Kingdom. The certification will be renewed annually. Our second-generation micro-inverter, Micro-Replus II, also received Electrical Testing Laboratories certification in the United States in 2014.

·In July 2013, we were upgraded to “Tier 1” status on the BNEF PV Module Maker Tier System, which was developed to differentiate the hundreds of manufacturers of solar modules in the market. A module manufacturer is qualified for the “Tier 1” status if it provides products to three different projects with non-recourse financing by three different banks in the past two years, respectively. In the same month, we were also awarded one of the highest credit ratings by China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation, or Sinosure, the largest and only state-owned insurer in China that provides credit insurance for the export of high value-added goods. We benefit from the acknowledgement from BNEF and Sinosure’s rating, as major PV project developers, engineering, procurement and construction contractors and financing credit providers rely on such BNEF report and Sinosure’s rating;

·In 2014, we were awarded a “TOP BRAND PV” seal in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg by EuPD Research, the leading market intelligence company in the sustainable business sector and an independent brand management appraiser of module manufacturers in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Benelux, and France; and

·In 2014, Solar Insurance & Finance, an international and independent insurance broker specializing in insurance for PV installations, certified our modules based on our positive audit, involving relevant technical, financial, environmental, and labor considerations; furthermore, our modules achieved top performance rankings on PV Evolution Labs’ “PV Module Reliability Scorecard” for 2014 in four testing categories: Dynamic Mechanical Load, Damp Heat, Potential Induced Degradation, and Humidity-Freeze, which are series of reliability tests conducted by PV Evolution Labs.

·In 2015, our PV testing laboratory in Jiangsu, China achieved Witness Testing Data Program certification from Underwriters Laboratories (UL), a globally renowned and independent safety science company.

·In 2015, our PV products obtained the Brazil INMETRO Certificate, which certifies that our products meet the Brazil standards and other technical requirements and allows our products to be coupled with the mandatory INMETRO mark and enter the Brazilian market. We also obtained the Mexico FIDE certificate issued by the Mexico energy conservation promotion foundation to allow us access to the Mexico market.

·In 2015, our PV products obtained the double glass, 3BB, 4BB Polysilicon and Multisilicon Certificates from TUV Rheinland. This certificate is based on the IEC61215 and IEC61703 standards and mainly recognized in the European market.

·In 2015, we also obtained Salt Mist Level 6 certificate issued by TUV Rheinland, which certifies the performance of our PV products to resist corrosion of salt fog, and the Ammonia Certificate issued by TUV Rheinland , which certifies the performance of our PV products in agricultural areas, especially livestock farms which are likely to produce high concentrations of ammonia.

As of December 31, 2015, we had a dedicated team of 336 employees overseeing our quality control processes that work collaboratively with our sales team to provide customer support and after-sale services. As an important part of the quality control process, we gather customer feedbackwho also typically provide warranties and performance guarantees for a period of time. Our O&M team and third party O&M service providers tests, checks and continuously monitors the quality and performance of our productsoperating solar power projects. See also “⸺Engineering, Procurement and address customer concerns in a timely manner.Construction” and “⸺Operations and Maintenance.”

 

Competition

 

The solar market is highly competitive and continually evolving. We expect to face increased competition, which may result in price reductions, reduced margins or loss of market share. There is increasing competition in the downstream solar business as traditional utility companies, solar manufacturers, state-owned companies, and financial institutions enter the market. There are manymarket in midst of the existing local incumbent services, distribution, and logisticsinternational developers. We also face competition from other renewable energy companies we have to successfully compete with in order to penetrate the variousand non-renewable power industries, including nuclear energy and fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum and natural gas. Our primary competitors include local and international target markets.developers and operators. As we broaden our energy-efficient product offerings, including LED products,solar power projects, we will encounter significant competition from both domestic and international markets. We believe that the key competitive factors

Our failure to adapt to changing market conditions and to compete successfully with existing or new competitors in the markets for solar wafers and modules include:


·product quality;

·price and cost competitiveness;

·manufacturing technologies and efficiency;

·power efficiency and performance;

·strength of supplier and customer relationships;

·aesthetic appearance of PV modules;

·economies of scale; and

·brand name and reputation.

The number of solar product manufacturers has rapidly increased due to the growth of actual and forecasted demand for solar power productsindustry, as well as the other renewable energy companies and the relatively low barriers to entry. Lower demand for solar modules due to weak macroeconomic conditionsnon-renewable power companies, will limit our growth and tightened credit for solar project financing combined with the increased supply of solar modules due to production capacity expansion by solar module manufacturers worldwide has caused the price of solar modules to decline beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. Although the solar industry has seen an increase in demand for solar power products due in part to the improvement of global economic conditions since 2009, when the global economic downturn hadwill have a material impactadverse effect on the demand for solar power products, the prices of solar power products have been volatile in recent years dueour business and prospects. See “Item 3. Key Information⸻D. Risk Factors⸻Risks Related to the unstable supply of solar power products. Even though demand has gradually increased in the last two years and the average price has increased and stabilized since the beginning of 2013, the industry may still be oversupplied throughout the solar value chain in the near future. Moreover, the solar industry is expected to continue to be highly competitive. Increased production efficiencies and improved technologies may further reduce costs of polysilicon and other silicon raw materials, which have already declined significantly over the past few years. Potential further expansion of manufacturing capacity in the future by us or by our competitors and potential new entrants into the market, given the relatively low barriers to entry, may result in continued excess capacity in the industry.

Our Business⸻We may also face competition from new entrants to the solar market, including those that offer more advanced technological solutions or that have greater financial resources, such as semiconductor manufacturers, several of which have announced their intention to start production of solar cells and modules. A significant number of our competitors are developing or currently producing products based on PV technologies which may be believed to be more advanced, including amorphous silicon, string ribbon and nano technology, which may eventually offer cost advantages over the crystalline polysilicon technologies currently used by us. A widespread adoption of any of these technologies could resultoperate in a rapid decline in demand for our productshighly competitive market and a resulting decrease in our revenues if we fail to adopt such technologies. In addition, similar to us, somemany of our competitors have become, or are becoming, vertically integrated in the PV industry value chain by acquiring or developing capabilities ranging from silicon ingot manufacturing to PV system sales and installation. This could further erode our competitive advantage as a vertically integrated PV product manufacturer. In addition, our competitors may also enter into the polysilicon manufacturing business, which may provide them with cost advantages. The entire PV industry also faces competition from conventional energy and non-solar renewable energy providers.

With respect to wafers, we compete primarily in terms of price, technology (based on conversion efficiencies), and quality. With respect to PV modules, we compete primarily in terms of price, reliability of delivery, consistency in the average wattage of our PV modules, durability, appearance and the quality of after-sale services. With respect to large integrated PV system projects, we compete primarily in terms of price, experience, and conversion efficiency. We believe our highly profitable and cost-effective products, strong brand name, well-established reputation and integrated service model make our products competitive.


Our competitors include integrated polysilicon suppliers, such as GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Limited and Renewable Energy Corporation, specialized solar wafer manufacturers, such as GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Limited and Comtec Solar Systems Group Limited. Our competitors also include integrated solar module manufacturers, such as Trina Solar Limited and Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited. Many of our competitors have a longer operating history, stronger market position, greater resources higher name recognition and better access to polysilicon than we do. ManyWe may not be able to compete successfully and we may lose or be unable to gain market share.”

Seasonality

Changes in climate, geography, weather patterns, and other phenomena in the regions where we operate may significantly affect our business. For example, solar power projects depend on the amount and intensity of sunlight, which is affected by weather and climate conditions. As a result, our competitors also haveIPP electricity production and amount of electricity sold and therefore our IPP revenue tend to be higher during periods or seasons when there is more established distribution networks and larger customer bases.irradiation. In addition, many of our competitors are developing and are currently producing products based on alternative solar power technologies,certain economic incentive programs, such as thin-film technologies,FIT regimes, generally include mechanisms that may reduce solar power products’ dependence on solar wafers.

The standard specificationsratcheted down the incentives over time in line with the general trend of monocrystalline wafers used by most solar cell manufacturers are wafers of 8 inches and the standard specifications of multicrystalline wafers of 156 mm by 156 mm. Most China-based wafer manufacturers, including us, offer wafers in these two sizes. Due to the lack of sufficient market information, it is difficult for us to ascertain our competitive position vis-à-vis our competitors. For example, conversion efficiencydecreasing system costs of solar power products is not only determined by the quality of solar wafers but is also dependent on the solar cell and module manufacturing processes and technology. Therefore, solar wafer manufacturers usually assume the conversion efficiency of their solar wafers based on the conversion efficiency of solar cells and modules manufactured by their customers, for which there is a lack of publicly available information.projects. As a result, it is difficultwe may schedule significant construction activities to connect solar power projects to the power grids prior to scheduled decreases in FIT rates, which vary from country to country, in order to qualify for us to ascertain the competitive position of our competitors’ solar wafers.more favorable FIT policies.

 

Environmental Matters

 

During our project development process, we often prepare environmental impact assessment reports as part of the permitting process. Our in-house EPC team and/or external EPC contractors monitor the EPC process and ensure the environmental compliance during the construction process. Once operational, our solar power projects do not generate industrial waste.

50

We believe we are in compliance with present environmental protection requirements in all material respects and have all material environmental permits necessary to conduct our business. Our manufacturing processes generate noise, waste water, gaseous wastes and other industrial wastes. We have installed various types of anti-pollution equipment at our premises to reduce, treat, and, where feasible, recycle the waste generated in our manufacturing processes. We outsource the treatment of some of our waste to third-party contractors. Our operations are subject to regulation and periodic monitoring by local environmental protection authorities.

Our polysilicon manufacturing facility in Meishan, Sichuan Province is equipped If we fail to comply with highly advanced technologypresent or future environmental laws and high-end equipmentregulations, we could be subject to achievefines, suspension of production or a fully closed-loop system which can recycle and convert certain waste into products through TCS that can be reused in the production process.cessation of operations.

 

Insurance

 

We maintain property insurance policies, including property all risk insurance and machinery breakdown insurance, with insurance companies covering our assets, equipment, facilities, buildings and building improvements. These insurance policies cover losses due to fire, explosion, flood and a wide range of other natural disasters. We also maintain commercial general liability insurance, including productprofessional liability insurance coverage for our products manufactured in China. We maintain performance guarantee insurance with insurance companies covering half of ReneSola brand solar products. We maintain transportation insurance to cover the transportation risk for our finished products. We maintain credit sale insurance with Sinosure and Euler Hermes to protect professional advice- and service-providing the company from bearing the full cost of defending against a negligence claim made by a client, and damages awarded in a civil lawsuit and public liability insurance will protect our credit salesbusiness from the claims made by third parties for injuries to the person, or damage to property caused as a result of our business activities all over the world. We do not maintain anyworld, as well as business interruption insurance for business interruption.and construction insurance. We maintain key-man life insurance for our executive officers. We maintainofficers, and director and officer liability insurance for our directors and executive officers. We consider our insurance coverage to be in line with other manufacturing companies of similar size in China. However, significant damage to any of our manufacturing facilities,solar power projects, whether as a result of fire or other causes, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation. We paid an aggregate of approximately $6.1 million in insurance premiums in 2015.

 

Regulation

 

A description of the material government regulations on our business in China is summarized below:

Renewable Energy Law and Other Government Directives

 

In February 2005, China enacted its Renewable Energy Law, which became effective on January 1, 2006 and as amended in December 2009. The Renewable Energy Law sets forth policies to encourage the development and use of solar energy and other non-fossil energy. The renewable energy law sets out the national policy to encourage and support the use of solar and other renewable energy and the use of on-grid generation. It also authorizes the relevant pricing authorities to set favorable prices for the purchase of electricity generated by solar and other renewable power generation systems.


The law also sets out the national policy to encourage the installation and use of solar energy water-heating systems, solar energy heating and cooling systems, photovoltaic, or PV, systems and other solar energy utilization systems. It also provides the general principles regarding financial incentives for the development of renewable energy projects. The projects, as listed in the renewable energy industry development guidance catalogue, may obtain preferential loans from financial institutions and can enjoy tax preferences. The State Council is authorized to stipulate the specific tax preferential treatments. However, so far, no rule has been issued by the State Council pertaining to this matter. In January 2006, the NDRC promulgated two implementation directives under the Renewable Energy Law. These directives set out specific measures in setting prices for electricity generated by solar and other renewable power generation systems and in sharing additional expenses incurred. The directives further allocate the administrative and supervisory authorities among different government agencies at the national and provincial levels and stipulate the responsibilities of electricity grid companies and power generation companies with respect to the implementation of the Renewable Energy Law.

 

The PRC Ministry of Construction also issued a directive in June 2005, which seeks to expand the use of solar energy in residential and commercial buildings and encourages the increased application of solar energy in different townships. In addition, the State Council promulgated a directive in July 2005, which sets out specific measures to conserve energy resources.

 

51

On September 4, 2006, the MOF and Ministry of Construction jointly promulgated the Interim Measures for Administration of Special Funds for Application of Renewable Energy in Building Construction, pursuant to which the MOF will arrange special funds to support the application of Building Integrated Photovoltaics systems, or BIPV applications, to enhance building energy efficiency, protect the environment and reduce consumption of fossil fuel energy. Under these measures, applications to provide hot water supply, refrigeration, heating and lighting are eligible for such special funds.

On April 1, 2008, the PRC Energy Conservation Law came into effect. Among other objectives, this law encourages the utilization and installation of solar power facilities in buildings for energy-efficiency purposes.

On December 16, 2011, the MOF and Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development jointly released a notice regarding the application of PV technology in building structures, pursuant to which the PRC government offer subsidies ranging from RMB7.5 to RMB9.0 per watt for BIPV projects. The construction of such BIPV projects must be completed in 2012.

On April 16, 2009, the General Offices of the PRC Ministry of FinanceMOF and the PRC Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development jointly issued the Guidelines for Declaration of Demonstration Project of Solar Photovoltaic Building Applications. These guidelines set the subsidy to be given in 2009 to qualified solar projects at no more than RMB20 per watt for projects involving the integration of solar components into buildings’ structural elements and at no more than RMB15 per watt for projects involving the installation of solar components onto building rooftops and wall surfaces. In July 2009 and in March 2011, the PRC Ministry of FinanceMOF and the PRC Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development jointly issued the Implementation Plan for Demonstration Cities with Renewable Energy Building Application, the Implementation Plan for Promoting Renewable Energy Building Application in Rural Areas and the Implementation Plan for Further Promoting Renewable Energy Building Application. Pursuant to these plans, the central government will provide subsidies to certain cities and rural areas with renewable energy building applications. In July 2009 and November 2009, the PRC Ministry of Finance,MOF, the PRC Ministry of Science & Technology, and the National Energy Bureau jointly issued measures that provide for government subsidies to support the solar power industry.

On September 21, 2010, the MOF, the NEA, Ministry of Science and Technology and Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development jointly released an announcement to strengthen the administration of, and provide details for, the implementation of the Golden Sun Demonstration Program and government subsidies for BIPV applications. Among other things, the announcement clarified that the PRC government will subsidize 50% of the cost of key equipment for on-grid PV projects and 70% of that for off-grid PV projects in remote regions. In addition, the government will offer subsidies of RMB4.0 per watt for on-grid PV projects, RMB6.0 per watt for BIPV projects and RMB10.0 per watt for off-grid PV projects in remote regions.

On October 10, 2010, the State Council of the PRC promulgated a decision to accelerate the development of seven strategic new industries. Pursuant to this decision, the PRC government will promote the popularization and application of solar thermal technologies by increasing tax and financial policy support, encouraging investment and providing other forms of beneficial support.

In March 2011, the National People’s Congress approved the Outline of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the PRC, which includes a national commitment to promoting the development of renewable energy and enhancing the competitiveness of the renewable energy industry. Accordingly, in January 2012, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, or MIIT, and the Ministry of Science and Technology respectively promulgated the Twelfth Five-Year Special Plans Regarding the New Materials Industry and the High-tech Industrialization to support the development of the PRC solar power industry.

On March 8, 2011, the MOF and the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development jointly promulgated the Circular on Further Application of Renewable Energy in Building Construction to increase the utilization of renewable energy in buildings.

On March 27, 2011, the NDRC promulgated the revised Guideline Catalogue for Industrial Restructuring which categorizes the solar power industry as an encouraged item. On February 16, 2013, the NDRC promulgated the 2013 revised Guideline Catalogue for Industrial Restructuring to be effective on May 1, 2013, the solar power industry is still categorized as an encouraged item.

52

 

On July 24, 2011, the NDRC issued the Notice re Improvement of On-grid Pricing Policy for Solar Photovoltaics, in which, among other things, the NDRC adopted the following nationwide unified on-grid pricing scheme for non-bidding PV projects: (i) for projects which are approved before July 1, 2011, completed before December 31, 2011 and the price of which has not been approved by the NDRC, the pre-tax on-grid price shall be RMB1.15/kwh;kWh; (ii) for projects which are approved after July 1, 2011, and for projects which are approved before July 1, 2011 but not completed as to December 31, 2011, the pre-tax on-grid price shall be RMB1/kwh,kWh, except for Tibet, the pre-tax price shall be RMB1.15/kwh.kWh. The NDRC may adjust such on-grid pricing scheme based on cost variations, technology development and other relevant factors.

On February 24, 2012, the MIIT released the Twelfth Five-Year Plan for the Solar Photovoltaic Industry. According to the industry plan, the PRC will reduce the cost of solar power to RMB0.8/kWh by 2015 and RMB0.6/kWh by 2020 and increase production of solar panels.

On July 7, 2012, the NEA officially released the Twelfth Five-Year Plan on Solar Power Development. In the document, the NEA stated that by 2015, the total installed capacity of distributed PV generation will achieve 10 GW in Eastern and Central China by focusing on the establishment of distributed PV generation systems in such areas, and the total installed capacity of 10 GW of grid-connected PV power plants will be established to increase local electrical power supply in the regions with rich solar resources and uncultivated land resources, such as Qinghai, Xinjiang, Gansu and Inner Mongolia. The total estimated investment is RMB250 billion.

On July 9, 2012, the State Council released the Twelfth Five-Year Development Plan for National Strategic New Industries. According to this document, by 2020, the total installed capacity of PV generation will achieve 50 million kW, and the research and manufacturing technology of PV equipment will reach advanced global levels. This document also set forth the major actions to be taken and policies to be promulgated for promoting the development of solar power industry.

 

On January 1, 2013, PRC State Council issued the 12th Five Year Plan for the Development of Energy. The plan supports the promotion and development of renewable energy, including the solar energy. The plan also encourages the development of solar PV power stations in the areas with abundant solar power resource.

 

On July 4, 2013, PRC State Council issued the Several Opinions on Promoting the Healthy Development of the Photovoltaic Industry, which further increases the installed capacity for solar electricity and puts forward various measures to develop the PV application market and adjust the industrial structure and regulate the industrial development order. In 2013, government authorities, including the NDRC, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, or the MIIT, the PRC National Energy Commission, the PRC Ministry of FinanceMOF and the PRC State Administration of Taxation, have issued a series of regulations to implement the Several Opinions.


On August 26, 2013, the NDRC issued the Notice re Leveraging the Price to Promote the Health Development of the Photovoltaic Industry, in which, among other things, the NDRC adopted the following measures: (i) the country was divided into three solar resources districts, in which the feed-in-tariffFIT is separately RMB0.90/kwh,kWh, RMB0.95/kwhkWh and RMB1.00/kwh;kWh; (ii) for distribution-grid-connected projects, the electricity subsidy standard is RMB0.42/kwh;kWh; (iii) the execution period for the aforesaid policies shall last, in principle, for 20 years; (iv) the aforesaid regional feed-in-tariffFIT policy shall apply to the PV power stations those were filed or approved after September 1, 2013 and those were filed or approved prior to September 1, 2013 but were put into operation after January 1, 2014, and the electricity subsidy standard shall apply to the distribution-grid-connected projects that are excluded from the central government investment subsidies. On December 26, 2016, the NDRC issued the Notice to adjust the FIT to RMB0.65/kWh, RMB0.75/kWh, RMB0.85/kWh, respectively, for three solar resources districts. For the distribution-grid-connected projects, the subsidy standard remains the same.

On August 29, 2013, the National Energy Administration promulgated the Interim Measures for the Administration of Solar Power Projects, which stipulated that solar power projects are subject to filings with the provincial NDRC. Such filing is subject to the national development plan for solar power generation, the regional scale index and implementation plan of the year as promulgated by the competent national energy authority and a pre-condition for connecting to power grid.

 

On September 23, 2013, the PRC Ministry of FinanceMOF and the PRC State Administration of Taxation jointly issued the “NoticeNotice on the Value-added Tax Policy for PV Power Generation, which provides 50% of the value-added tax paid by taxpayers in connection with sales of self-produced electrical products generated by solar energy will be immediately refunded to the taxpayers when the value-add tax is collected. This VAT refund will bepolicy was effective from October 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015. On July 25, 2016, the MOF and the PRC State Administration of Taxation jointly issued the Notice on Continuation of Implementation of the Value-added Tax Policy for PV Power Generation, which provides that the 50% of VAT refund policy will continue to be effective from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018.

53

 

On November 26,18, 2013, the PRC National Energy Commission issuedNEA promulgated the “InterimInterim Measures for the SupervisionAdministration of Photovoltaic PowerDistributed Generation Projects, or the Distributed PV Interim Measures, pursuant to which clarifyDG projects are subject to filings with the provincial or regional NDRC. Such filing is subject to State Council’s rules for administration of investment projects and the regional scale index and implementation plan of the year as promulgated by the competent national energy authority. DG projects in the regional scale index of the year that are not completed or put into operation within two years from their respective filing date must be cancelled and disqualified to receive national subsidies. The Distributed PV Interim Measures also provide that the state departmentfiling procedures should be simplified and the electric power business permit and permits in chargerelation to land planning, environmental impact review, energy saving evaluation and other supporting documents may be waived. Detailed requirements of energythe filing are also subject to local regulations, and its local counterpartsthe effects of the Distributed PV Interim Measures on our business are responsibleyet to be evaluated.

On January 17, 2014, the NEA issued the Circular on Targets for the supervisionIncrease in PV Power Generation Capacity for 2014, and announced that the total target for the increase in PV power generation capacity for 2014 will be 14 GW, of PVwhich 8 GW will be reserved for distributed power generation and 6 GW will be reserved for power generation by solar power projects. The interim measures are valid for three years starting from the date of promulgation.

 

On February 8, 2014, the National Certification and Accreditation Administration and the PRC National Energy Commission jointly issued the Implementation Opinions on Strengthening the Testing and Certification of PV Products, or Implementation Opinions, which provide that only certified PV products may be connected to the public grid or receive government subsidies. The institutions that certify PV products must be approved by the Certification and Accreditation Administration. According to the Implementation Opinions, PV products that are subject to certification include PV battery parts, inverters, control devices, confluence devices, energy storage devices and independent PV systems.

 

On June 7, 2014, the General Office of the State Council of the PRC government set a target of 100 GW of solar capacity by 2020. In March 2015, the NEA revised China’s 2015 solar electricity installation target upwards by 20% to 17.8 GW of capacity for ground mounted projects and indicated that rooftop DG projects would no longer be subject to a quota. On April 2, 2015, the State Grid announced that 10 GW of solar power projects would be connected to grid every year until 2020. On September 24, 2015, the NEA increased the capacity scale by additional 5,300 MW in total for PV power stations in certain regions and the PV power stations that fall within such increased capacity shall generally be connected to the grid no later than June 30, 2016. In March 2016, the NEA set a target of 150 GW of solar capacity by 2020. Pursuant to the relevant regulations, rooftop DG projects generally receive a national subsidy of RMB0.42/kWh plus the local desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price for the electricity sold to the State Grid or a negotiated electricity purchase price for electricity sold directly to consumers. Ground mounted projects, as well as rooftop DG projects that sell all electricity generated to the local grid companies, are entitled to FIT of RMB0.80/kWh, RMB0.88/kWh or RMB0.98/kWh, depending on where the project is located (excluding on grid solar power projects located in Tibet), provided that these projects are filed after January 1, 2016 and fall within the regional scale index of the year, or these projects are filed prior to January 1, 2016 and fall within regional scale index of the year, but do not commence operations prior to June 30, 2016. Moreover, a solar power project that has obtained government approval on or after January 1, 2008 is fully exempted from PRC corporate income tax for three years starting from the year in which such project generates revenue from the sale of electricity, and is 50% exempted from PRC corporate income tax for another three years. Besides, certain solar power project entities enjoy the preferential tax policies in connection with the development of the western region of China and are subject to a preferential tax rate of 15%. The enterprises which are eligible for such preferential tax policy must engage in the business falling in the scope of the Catalogue of Encouraged Industries in Western Region, or Western Catalogue, promulgated by the NDRC. Enterprises that are eligible for the preferential tax rate of 15% may be able to enjoy such preferential tax rate and tax holiday simultaneously where certain criteria are met.

On September 2, 2014, the PRC National Energy Commission issued the Notice on Further Implementing Relevant Policies of Distributed Photovoltaic Power Generation, requiring relevant government authorities to continue to highly value the development of distributed photovoltaic, or PV power, further improve the quality of photovoltaicPV power projects, and put forward various measures to develop the PV application market and regulate the industrial development in the photovoltaicPV industry.

54

 

On October 9, 2014, the PRC National Energy Commission issued the Notice on Further Optimizing Operation Management of Photovoltaic Power Stations, requiring relevant government authorities to continue to highly value the construction of photovoltaicPV power stations, and put forward various measures to regulate the operation of on-grid and grid-tied electricity generation projects. Also, the Notice encourages local government authorities to guide and coordinate the construction of rooftop PV power systems by building owners or specialized enterprises, coordinate the connection of the systems to the power grid, enter projects on file and perform project management duties.

 

On October 28, 2014, NEC promulgated the Circular on Regulating the Investment and Development Order of PV Power Stations, pursuant to which the filings of solar power projects will be automatically invalidated if the construction of solar power projects has not commenced prior to the expiration of such filings and no application for extension has been made.

On March 16, 2015, the PRC National Energy Commission issuedNEA promulgated the NoticeCircular on ImplementationImplementing Plans of PhotovoltaicPV Generation Construction for 2015, which providesrevised China’s 2015 solar electricity installation target upwards by 20% to 17.8 GW of capacity for ground-mounted projects and indicated that rooftop DG projects would no longer be subject to a quota.

On April 2, 2015, the newly installed capacity plan for PVState Grid announced that 10 GW of solar power systems for theprojects would be connected to grid every year of 2015 is 17,800 MW. Centralized and distributed PV power generation projects constructed within the plan are entitled to subsidies from national specialized fund for renewable energy development.until 2020. On September 24, 2015, the PRC National Energy Commission further issued notice to increaseNEA increased the capacity scale by additional 5,300 MW in total for PV power stations in certain regions and the PV power stations that fall within such increased capacity shall generally be connected to the grid no later than June 30, 2016. In March 2016, the NEA set a target of nationwide photovoltaic generation construction scale, mainly to support new energy and green energy model cities which have superior photovoltaic power station construction conditions and have completed the existing construction plans.150 GW of solar capacity by 2020.

 

On March 25, 2015, the MIIT issued the Standard Conditions for the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Industry (2015 Edition), or the Standard, which clarifies that the minimum capital base ratio will be 20% for new, innovative and expanded PV manufacturing projects. The Standards also stipulate that new, innovative and expanded PV manufacturing projects should stringently implement the environment impact assessment system, and that projects cannot commence their construction unless they pass the environment impact assessment examination. Also the emission of exhaust gas and wastewater must meet national and local emission standards and overall control requirements for air and water pollutants.


On April 20, 2015, the PRC National Energy Commission and the State Administration of Work Safety jointly issued the Standard for Safety Production of Photovoltaic Power Enterprises, which mainly defines standardized photovoltaicPV power generation project, and provides for standards and requirements for photovoltaicPV power generation enterprises with respect to their production goals, organization and duty, safe production input, safety management system, education and training, production equipment and facilities, operation safety, hidden danger investigation and governance, monitoring of major hazard source, occupational health, emergency rescue and certain other production and operation aspects.

 

On June 1, 2015, the PRC National Energy Commission, the MIIT and the Certification and Accreditation Administration of the PRC jointly promulgated the Opinions on Promoting the Application of Advance Photovoltaic Technology Products and Upgrading the Photovoltaic Industry, which emphasizes that the market plays a decisive role in allocating resources and leading the industrial upgrade of photovoltaicPV technology. According to the different stages of the development of photovoltaicPV technology and products, PRC government will adopt differentiated market access standards in supporting advanced technology products to expand the market and accelerating the elimination of outmoded products. It also provides that new photovoltaicPV power generation project shall meet the requirements stipulated in the Standard Conditions for the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Industry (2015 Edition) promulgated by MIIT. For example, the photoelectric conversion efficiency rates of polycrystalline silicon module and single crystal silicon module shall not be less than 15.5% and 16%, respectively.

 

On November 27, 2015, the State Forestry Administration promulgated the Circular on the Use of Forest Land for the Construction of PV Power Stations, pursuant to which the approval from local forestry administration authority is required prior to the construction of the PV power stations and certain kinds of forest land are forbidden or restricted from being used to construct PV power stations. The Circular on Promulgating the Controlling of Index of Construction Land Use for PV Power Stations issued by the Ministry of Land and Resources on December 2, 2015, which became effective on January 1, 2016 and will be valid for five years, provides the control and approval of index of construction land use for newly constructed, reconstructed and expanded PV power stations.

On December 22, 2015, the NDRC issued the Notice on Improving the Feed-in Tariff Policies for Onshore Wind Power/Photovoltaic Power Generation, which provides the benchmarking feed-in tariffFIT of photovoltaicsolar power generation for the year of 2016. The NDRC continued to adopt the measures that divided the country into three solar resources districts, of which the feed-in tariffsFITs are RMB0.80/kwh,kWh, RMB0.88/kwhkWh and RMB0.98/kwh.kWh.

 

55

In March 2016, the National People’s Congress approved the Outline of the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the PRC, which mentions a national commitment to continuing to support the development of PV generation industry.

On June 3, 2016, the PRC National Energy Commission issued the Notice on Implementation Plans of Photovoltaic Generation Construction for 2016, which provides that the newly installed capacity plan for PV power systems for the year of 2016 is 18,100 MW. Centralized and distributed PV power generation projects constructed pursuant to the plan are entitled to subsidies from national specialized fund for renewable energy development.

On May 30, 2016, the NDRC and the PRC National Energy Commission jointly issued the Guidance Opinion on Improving Scale Management of Photovoltaic Generation and Implementing Competitive Allocation of Projects, classifying the PV generation projects according to, among others, the type, scale, condition to connect to the grid, the absorption scope and the purpose of facilitating technological progress of such PV generation projects. Except for PV power generation projects meeting certain conditions, other projects shall compete for the annual construction scale quota. Among others, the competition conditions include investment capacity of the enterprises, preparation in progress, the condition to connect to the grid and absorption, and most importantly, the on-grid price.

On March 24, 2016, the NDRC published the Administrative Measures on the Guaranteed Procurement Mechanism of Electricity Generated from Renewable Energy Resources, which split the electricity generated from renewable energy resources into two tranches, i.e., amount guaranteed to be purchased and amount traded in accordance with the market-oriented approach. The amount guaranteed to be purchased will be purchased at FIT according to certain allocation plans or prioritized contracts with grid companies. As for the amount traded in accordance with the market-oriented approach, the electricity providers can voluntarily enter into contracts with grid companies in the open market.

On December 10, 2016, the NDRC issued the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for the Development of Renewable Energy. The plan supports the healthy development of renewable energy.

On December 26, 2016, the NDRC issued the Notice on Adjusting the feed-in tariff price for Onshore Wind Power/Photovoltaic Power Generation Projects, reducing the feed-in tariff price of the photovoltaic power generation infrastructures constructed after January 1,2017. The disparity between the FIT for PV power generation projects and the desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price are funded by the renewable energy development funds.

On July 19, 2017, the NEA issued the Guidelines for Thirteenth Five-Year Plan, this document set forth the major actions to be taken and policies to regulating development of the photovoltaic industry.

On October 31, 2017, the NDRC and NEA published the Notice on the Pilot of Distributed Generation Traded in Markets (file 2017-1901) to establish electricity trading market for DG projects which are similar to virtual net metering and US community solar gardens.

Laws and Regulations Concerning the Electric Power Industry

The regulatory framework of the PRC power industry consists primarily of the Electric Power Law of the PRC, which became effective on April 1, 1996 (lately revised effective on April 24, 2015) and the Electric Power Regulatory Ordinance, which became effective on May 1, 2005. One of the stated purposes of the Electric Power Law is to protect the legitimate interests of investors, operators and users and to ensure the safety of power operations. According to the Electric Power Law, the PRC government encourages PRC and foreign investment in the power industry. The Electric Power Regulatory Ordinance sets forth regulatory requirements for many aspects of the power industry, including, among others, the issuance of electric power business permits, the regulatory inspections of power generators and grid companies and the legal liabilities for violations of the regulatory requirements.

Obtaining the Electric Power Business Permit

On January 5, 2006, the NDRC promulgated the Administrative Provisions on Renewable Energy Power Generation which set forth specific measures for setting the price of electricity generated from renewable energy sources, including solar and for allocating the costs associated with renewable power generation. The Administrative Provisions on Renewable Energy Power Generation also delegate administrative and supervisory authority among government agencies at the national and provincial levels and assign partial responsibility to electricity grid companies and power generation companies for implementing the Renewable Energy Law.

56

Pursuant to the Provisions on the Administration of the Electric Power Business Permit, which were issued by the SERC and became effective on December 1, 2005 (subsequently revised on May 30, 2015), unless otherwise provided by the SERC, no company or individual in the PRC may engage in any aspect of electric power business (including power generation, transmission, dispatch and sales) without first obtaining an electric power business permit from the SERC. These provisions also require that if an applicant seeks an electric power business permit to engage in power generation, it must also obtain in advance all relevant government approvals for the project including construction, generation capacity and environmental compliance.

However, there are exceptions which our certain PV Power Generation Projects may not need obtain an electric power business permit from the SERC. On July 18, 2013, the NDRC issued the Interim Measures for the Administration of Distributed PV Power Generation, which waived the previous requirement to obtain an Electric Power Business Permit for DG projects. On April 9, 2014, the NEA issued the Circular on Clarifying Issues concerning the Administration of Electric Power Business Permit, which waived requirement to obtain an Electric Power Business Permit for those solar power generation projects with installed capacity less than 6 MW and any DG projects approved by or filed with the NDRC or its local branches, and required local NEA to simplify the Electric Power Business Permit application procedure for the solar power generation companies.

Obtaining the Construction Engineering Qualifications and Permit

Pursuant to the Construction Law which was promulgated by the Ministry of Construction on November 11, 1997 (effective on March 1, 1998) and amended on April 22, 2011 and the Regulation on Administration on Qualifications of Construction Engineering which became effective on March 1, 2015, an enterprise engaged in the design and engineering work for an electric power project must obtain a qualification certificate and must conduct its work within the strict design scope set forth in its certificate. An enterprise conducting design or engineering work without first obtaining the qualification certificate or an enterprise that has obtained the qualification certificate but exceeds the permitted design scope may be subject to action by the relevant authorities, including monetary penalties, rescission of its certification or confiscation of all illicit gains.

Pursuant to the Provisions on the Administration of Permits of Installation, Repair, and Test of Electric Power Facilities, which were promulgated by the SERC and became effective on March 1, 2010, any entity or individual engaged in installing, repairing or testing of electric power facilities in the PRC must obtain a permit unless otherwise exempted by the SERC. There are three categories of permits and each category is further subdivided into five levels. Each category represents a specific range of activity i.e., installation, repair and testing. Each level denotes the maximum voltage level of an electric facility that a permit holder may work with. To apply for a permit, an applicant must submit the application to the local branch of SERC. A permit holder may also apply to change either the permitted matter, which is the category or level of the permit, or the registered matter, which is the name, legal address, legal representative and other pertinent matters. A permit is valid for six years and can be renewed.

Grid Connection and Dispatchment

All electric power generated in China is distributed through power grids, except for electric power generated by facilities not connected to a grid. The distribution of power to each grid is administered by dispatch centers, which the administration and dispatch of planned output by power plants connected to the grid. The Regulations on the Administration of Electric Power Dispatch to Networks and Grids, promulgated by the State Council and the former Ministry of Electric Power Industry, effective on November 1, 1993, as amended on January 8, 2011, and its implementation measures, regulate the operation of dispatch centers.

FIT and Subsidies

FIT Payments

The Renewable Energy Law of the PRC, which was amended on December 26, 2009 and became effective on April 1, 2010, sets forth policies to encourage the development and utilization of solar power and other renewable energy. The Renewable Energy Law authorizes the relevant pricing authorities to set favorable prices for electricity generated from solar and other renewable energy sources.

57

The Circular on Improving Policies on the On-grid Tariffs of Solar Power Generation, which was issued by the NDRC and became effective on July 24, 2011, provides that the FIT (including VAT) for solar power projects approved before July 1, 2011 that began operation before December 31, 2011 would be RMB1.15/kWh and the FIT (including VAT) for solar power projects either approved after July 1, 2011 or completed after December 31, 2011 would be RMB1.00/kWh (excluding on-grid solar power projects located in Tibet).

The NDRC further issued the Circular on Promoting the Healthy Development of PV Industry by Price Leverage on August 26, 2013, or the 2013 Circular. Under this circular, the FIT (including VAT) for solar power projects approved or filed after September 1, 2013 or beginning operation after January 1, 2014 would be RMB0.90/kWh, RMB0.95/kWh or RMB1.00/kWh, depending on the locations of the projects (excluding on-grid solar power projects located in Tibet).

In addition, the 2013 Circular sets forth special rules that entitle DG projects (excluding the projects that have received an investment subsidy from the central budget) to a national subsidy of RMB0.4/kWh. According to the Circular on Further Implementing Polices Relating to Distributed Generation issued by the NEA on September 2, 2014 and the Circular on Implementation Plans of PV Generation Construction for 2015 issued by the NEA on March 16, 2015, rooftop DG projects that sell electricity directly to consumers or to both consumers and grid enterprises will receive a national subsidy of RMB0.42/kWh plus the local desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price for the electricity sold to the State Grid or a negotiated electricity purchase price for electricity sold directly to consumers. Ground-mounted projects and rooftop DG projects which sell all electricity to grid enterprises are entitled to the FIT of RMB0.90/kWh, RMB0.95/kWh or RMB1.00/kWh, depending on where the project is located (excluding on-grid solar power projects located in Tibet).

On December 22, 2015, the NDRC issued the Circular on Improving the Policies on the On-grid Tariffs of Onshore Wind Power Generation and PV Generation, effective on January 1, 2016, which provides that ground mounted projects, as well as rooftop DG projects that sell all electricity generated to the local grid companies, are entitled to FIT of RMB0.80/kWh, RMB0.88/kWh or RMB0.98/kWh, depending on where the project is located (excluding on grid solar power projects located in Tibet), provided that these projects are filed after January 1, 2016 and fall within the regional scale index of the year, or these projects are filed prior to January 1, 2016 and fall within regional scale index of the year, but do not commence operations prior to June 30, 2016.

The difference (in amount) between the FIT for solar power projects and the desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price, or the subsidies paid to DG projects, are funded by the renewable energy development funds. The above FIT and subsidy policies are valid for 20 years for each power generation project since its formal operation, in principle.

On December 19, 2017, the NDRC issued the Notice to adjust the price of general metering to RMB0.55/kWh, RMB0.65/kWh, RMB0.75/kWh, respectively, for three solar resources districts, as well as reducing the price of net metering to RMB0.37/kWh.

Subsidy Catalog

On November 29, 2011, the MOF, the NDRC and the NEA jointly issued the Interim Measures for the Administration of Levy and Use of Renewable Energy Development Fund, which provides that development funds for renewable energy include designated funds arranged by the public budget of national finance, and renewable energy tariff surcharge collected from electricity consumers. Solar power projects can only receive central government subsidies after completing certain administrative and perfunctory procedures with the relevant authorities of finance, price and energy to be listed in the Subsidy Catalog issued by the MOF, the NDRC and the NEA. These subsidies represent the difference between the FIT for solar power projects and the desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price. In January 2016, the NEA announced that there would be a nation-wide inspection on all the solar power projects that are in operation and under construction, and the solar power projects that fall within the regional scale index of the year would be included in and managed via the Platform for Renewable Energy Power Generation Projects for the purpose of government subsidies application and payment.

58

In order to be listed in the Subsidy Catalog, ground-mounted projects submit applications to the relevant provincial authorities; and in accordance with the Circular on Issues Concerning Implementing Electric Quantity-based Subsidy Policy for Distributed Generation Projects issued by the MOF on July 24, 2013, rooftop DG projects submit applications to the grid enterprises in the area where the projects are located. After preliminary review of the applications, the provincial authorities will jointly report to the MOF, the NDRC and the NEA, and the MOF, the NDRC and the NEA will have final review on such applications to decide whether to list in the Subsidy Catalog.

The following flow chart illustrates the process for a utility-scale project to be listed in the Subsidy Catalog.

Development Funds of Renewable Energy

The Renewable Energy Law provides financial incentives, including national funding for the development of renewable energy projects.

Pursuant to the Interim Measures for the Administration of Designated Funds for the Development of Renewable Energy issued by the MOF and effective on April 2, 2015 in place of its old version, the MOF sets up designated funds to support the development and utilization of renewable energy in accordance with the national fiscal budget.

According to the Implementing Measures for the Administration of Price of Renewable Energy and Cost Sharing Program and the Interim Measures for Adjustment to Additional On-grid Tariff for Renewable Energy issued by the NDRC, the gap between the FIT for solar power projects and the desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price is subsidized by collecting tariff surcharge from the electricity consumers within the service coverage of grid enterprises at or above provincial level.

Mandatory Purchase of Renewable Energy

The Renewable Energy Law imposes mandatory obligations on grid enterprises to purchase the full amount of on-grid electricity generated by approved renewable energy plants whose power generation projects meet the grid connection technical standards in the areas covered by the grid enterprises’ power grids. Grid enterprises must improve the power grid construction in order to better absorb electricity generated from renewable energy.

Pursuant to the Measures for the Supervision and the Administration of Purchase of Full Amount of Renewable Energy by Grid Companies issued by the SERC in July 2007, the SERC and its local branches supervise the purchase of the full amount of renewable energy by the grid enterprises. If the grid enterprises do not purchase the full volume of the electricity generated from the renewable energy due to the circumstances such as force majeure or any other circumstance endangering the safety and stability of the power grids, the grid enterprises must promptly notify the renewable energy power generation companies of the details in writing and also submit detailed facts to the competent local branches of the SERC.

The Several Opinions on Promoting the Healthy Development of PV Industry also requires the grid enterprises to ensure PV power generation projects’ timely connection to the power grid and purchase the full amount of electricity generated by the PV power generation projects.

On March 20, 2015, the NDRC and the NEA issued a directive opinion, which emphasizes that the competent provincial authorities must strengthen the implementation of the provisions with regard to the purchase of the full amount of electricity generated by renewable energy and avoid any curtailment of solar power projects. In addition, it also stated that electricity generated by clean energy is encouraged to be sold directly to the consumers in the regions where there is ample supply of clean energy, and the relevant parities must coordinate the trans-provincial supply of electricity and power transmission capability, in order to maximize the utilization of clean energy. Local governments also announced their intentions to efficiently implement the system regarding the purchase of the full amount of renewable energy, such as the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Government.

59

On March 24, 2016, the NDRC issued the Measures for the Administration of Guaranteed Purchase of Full Amount of Renewable Energy, to strengthen the administration of, and provide details for, the implementation of purchase of the full amount of renewable energy by the grid enterprises.

Clean Development Mechanism

Clean Development Mechanism, or CDM, is an arrangement under the Kyoto Protocol under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or the UNFCCC. It allows industrialized countries with a greenhouse gas emission reduction commitment to invest in emission reducing projects in developing countries in order to earn Certified Emission Reduction, or CERs. The PRC approved and ratified the UNFCCC in 1993 and the Kyoto Protocol in 2002, but has no binding obligation to meet the emission reduction targets. On August 3, 2011, the Measures for the Administration of Operation of Clean Development Mechanism Projects promulgated by the NDRC jointly with the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the MOF, sets forth general rules and specific requirements for the application for, and approval of, CDM projects. Only companies wholly owned or controlled by PRC companies are qualified to apply for the PRC government’s approval for a CDM project. Some of our solar power projects are on the list of CDM projects.

Environmental Protection

The construction processes of our solar power projects may generate material levels of noise, waste water, gaseous emissions and other wastes. Therefore, we are subject to a variety of government regulations related to the storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials and to the protection of the environment of the community. The major environmental regulations applicable our business activities in the PRC include the Environmental Protection Law of the PRC, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Noise Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Solid Waste Pollution, the Environmental Impact Evaluation of Law, and the Regulations on the Administration of Environmental Protection In Construction Projects. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Compliance with environmentally safe production and construction regulations can be costly, while non-compliance with such regulations may result in adverse publicity and potentially significant monetary damages, fines and suspension of our business operations.”

Foreign Investment in Solar Power Business

The principal regulation governing foreign ownership of solar power businesses in the PRC is the Foreign Investment Industrial Guidance Catalog. Under the current catalog, which was amended in 2017 and became effective on July 28, 2017, the solar power industry is classified as an “encouraged foreign investment industry.” Foreign-invested enterprises in the encouraged foreign investment industry are entitled to certain preferential treatment, such as exemption from tariff on equipment imported for their operations, after obtaining approval from the PRC government authorities.

Environmental and Safety Regulations

 

We are subject to a variety of governmental regulations related to environmental protection. The major environmental regulations applicable to us include the Environmental Protection Law of PRC, the Law of PRC on the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, Implementation Rules of the Law of PRC on the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, the Law of PRC on the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution, the Law of PRC on the Prevention and Control of Solid Waste Pollution, and the Law of PRC on the Prevention and Control of Noise Pollution. In addition, we are also subject to laws and regulations governing work safety and occupational disease prevention.

 

We believe we are in compliance with present environmental protection requirements in all material respects and have all material environmental permits necessary to conduct our business. Our operations are subject to regulation and periodic monitoring by local environmental protection and work safety authorities.

 

60

In response to concerns suggesting that emissions of certain gases, commonly referred to as “greenhouse gases” (including carbon dioxide and methane) may be contributing to global climate change, China has indicated that it highly commends and supports the Copenhagen Accord, which endorses the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol. In 2009, China has decided to reduce the intensity of carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDPgross domestic product by 40% to 45% by 2020, compared with the levels of 2005. This decision may require changes to the current law and policy. Any such changes in environmental laws or regulations may have adverse impact on the manufacture, sale and disposal of solar power products and their raw materials, which may in turn adversely affect us, our suppliers and our customers.

Restriction on Foreign Ownership

 

The principal regulation governing foreign ownership of solar power businesses in the PRC is the Foreign Investment Industrial Guidance Catalogue issued by the NDRC and the PRC Ministry of Commerce, effective as of April 10, 2015,July 28, 2017, or the Catalogue 2015,2017, which is a replacement of the 2007, 2011 and 20112015 versions of the Foreign Investment Industrial Guidance Catalogue. The Catalogue 20152017 classifies the various industries into four categories: encouraged, permitted, restricted and prohibited. Foreign invested companies categorized as “encouraged” are entitled to preferential treatment by the PRC government authorities, including exemption from tariffs on equipment imported for its own use. ReneSola Zhejiang was categorized in the “encouraged” industry under the Catalogue 2015.2017.


Regulation of Foreign Currency Exchange and Dividend Distribution

 

Foreign Currency Exchange. Foreign currency exchange in China is primarily regulated by:

 

·PRC Foreign Exchange Administration Regulation (1996), as amended in 1997 and 2008, or the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulation; and

 

·The Administration Rules of the Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange (1996).

 

Under the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulation, the Renminbi is convertible for current account items, which include, among other things, dividend payments, interest and royalties payments, and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of Renminbi into foreign currency for capital account items, such as direct investment, loans, investment in securities and repatriation of funds, however, is still subject to the approval of SAFE or its local branches. Under the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulation, foreign-invested enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at the banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange transactions by complying with certain procedural requirements such as providing valid commercial documents and, in the case of capital account item transactions, only after obtaining approval from SAFE or its local branches. Capital investments directed outside of China by foreign-invested enterprises are also subject to restrictions, which include approvals by the PRC Ministry of Commerce, SAFE or its local branches and the PRC State Reform and Development Commission. Under our current structure, our income will be primarily derived from dividend payments from our operating subsidiaries in China.

 

On March 30, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Administration of Foreign Exchange Settlement of Registered Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or Circular 19, which allows foreign-invested enterprises generally to decide when to exchange into Renminbi their foreign exchange denominated paid-in capital, but only up to a maximum percentage specified by SAFE. The maximum percentage specified by SAFE is currently 100%, but SAFE may choose to adjust the permitted level in due time in light of international balance of payments. The use of any such Renminbi funds by foreign-invested enterprises is also subject to review and approval by SAFE or local SAFE branches or designated banks. Circular 19 further provides that any such Renminbi funds of a foreign-invested enterprise may not be used for any purpose outside of the entity’s business scope or if such use would violate the laws and regulations of the PRC. For example, such Renminbi funds may not be used for the making of Renminbi-denominated entrusted loans that are not within the enterprise’s business scope, for the repayment of inter-enterprise loans (including third party advances), or for the purpose of relending to third parties Renminbi-denominated bank loans made to the enterprise. Violations of Circular 19 could result in severe monetary penalties, including substantial fines as set forth in the PRC Foreign Exchange Administration Regulation.

 

Dividend Distribution. Pursuant to the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulation and various regulations issued by SAFE or its local branches, and other relevant PRC government authorities, the PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China.

 

61

The principal regulations governing the distribution of dividends paid by Sino-Foreign equity joint venture enterprises and wholly foreign owned enterprises include:

 

·PRC Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law (1979), as amended in 1990, 2001 and 2001;2016;

 

·Implementation Rules of the PRC Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law (1983), as amended in 1986, 1987, 2001 and 2001;2014;

 

·PRC Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law ( 1986), as amended in 2000;2000 and 2016; and

 

·Implementation Rules of the PRC Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law (1990), as amended in 2001.2001 and 2014.

 

Under these laws and regulations, Sino-foreign equity joint venture enterprises and wholly foreign owned enterprises in China may, subject to the ongoing compliance with applicable foreign exchange regulations, pay dividends only out of their accumulated after-tax profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, the enterprise in China is required to set aside at least 10.0% of their after-tax profit based on PRC accounting standards each year to its statutory reserves until the accumulative amount of such reserves reach 50.0% of its registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Foreign-invested enterprise has the discretion to allocate a portion of its after-tax profits to reserve fund, staff welfare, bonus funds and expansion funds, which may not be distributed to equity owners except in the event of liquidation.


In May 2013, SAFE issued Notice 21, which provides detailed disclosure requirements and examination standards for SAFE registration. Foreign organizations and individuals involved in direct investment activities in China shall be registered with the SAFE branches, including the overseas SPVs established by PRC residents for the purpose of holding domestic or offshore assets or interests. On June 1, 2015, SAFE issued Notice 13, pursuant to which, entities and individuals are required to apply for foreign exchange registration of foreign direct investment and overseas direct investment, with qualified banks, instead of SAFE.

 

In July 2014, SAFE promulgated Notice 37, which replaced Notice 75 (Notice on Issues Relating to the Administration of Foreign Exchange in Fund-raising and Reverse Investment Activities of Domestic Residents Conducted via Offshore Special Purpose Companies) promulgated by SAFE in October 2005.

 

Notice 37 requires PRC residents to register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore entity, referred to in Notice 37 as a “special purpose vehicle,” for the purpose of holding domestic or offshore assets or interests. Notice 37 further requires amendment to a PRC resident’s registration in the event of any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle,SPV, such as an increase or decrease in the capital contributed by PRC individuals, share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material event. In the event that a PRC shareholder holding interests in a special purpose vehicleSPV fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicleSPV may be prohibited from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities, and the special purpose vehicleSPV may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital to its PRC subsidiary.

 

Moreover, Notice 37 applies retroactively. As a result, PRC residents who had made capital contributions to SPVs based on their lawful domestic or overseas assets or interests but did not go through overseas investment foreign exchange registration formalities prior to the implementation of Notice 37 should provide the local SAFE branch with written explanations regarding their failure to do so, and the local SAFE branch will conduct registration retrospectively based on the principle of legality and reasonableness.

 

On June 16, 2016, SAFE promulgated the Notice on Reforming and Regulating of Settlement of Foreign Exchange of Capital Account, which allows domestic enterprises, including Chinese enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises (excluding financial institutions), to exchange settlement for foreign debts in the form of voluntary exchange settlement. For foreign exchange receipts (including the foreign exchange capital, foreign debts and the repatriated funds raised in the overseas listing) which are allowed to be settled voluntarily, domestic entities may complete foreign exchange settlement formalities with their bank according to their business operation need.

According to these regulations, PRC residents who have established or acquired control of our company are required to register with SAFE in connection with their investments in us.

62

 

On December 25, 2006, the People’s Bank of China promulgated the “Measures for Administration of Individual Foreign Exchange.” On January 5, 2007, SAFE promulgated the Implementation Rules of Measures for Administration of Individual Foreign Exchange.Exchange and as amended on May 29, 2016. On February 15, 2012, SAFE promulgated the Notice on Issues Related to Foreign Exchange Administration in Domestic Individuals’ Participation in Equity Incentive Plans of Companies Listed Abroad, or Notice 7. According to Notice 7, PRC citizens who are granted shares or share options by a company listed on an overseas stock market according to its employee share option plan or share incentive plan are required to register with SAFE or its local counterparts.

Intellectual Property Rights

Patent

 

The PRC has domestic laws for the protection of rights in copyrights, patents, trademarks and trade secrets. The PRC is also a signatory to the world’s major intellectual property conventions, including:

 

·Convention establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO Convention) (June 4, 1980);

 

·Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (March 19, 1985);

 

·Patent Cooperation Treaty (January 1, 1994); and

 

·The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) (November 11, 2001).

Patents in the PRC are governed by the PRC Patent Law (March 12, 1984), as amended and its Implementing Regulations (January 19, 1985), as amended.

 

The PRC is a signatory to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, in accordance with which any person who has duly filed an application for a patent in one signatory country shall enjoy, for the purposes of filing in the other countries, a right of priority during the period fixed in the convention (12 months for inventions and utility models, and 6 months for industrial designs).

 

The PRC Patent Law covers three kinds of patents, namely, patents for inventions, utility models and designs. The Chinese patent system adopts the principle of first to file. This means that, where multiple patent applications are filed for the same invention, a patent will be granted only to the party that filed its application first. Consistent with international practice, the PRC only allows the patenting of inventions or utility models that possess the characteristics of novelty, inventiveness and practical applicability. For a design to be patentable, it should not be identical with or similar to any design which has been publicly disclosed in publications in the country or abroad before the date of filing or has been publicly used in the country before the date of filing, and should not be in conflict with any prior right of another.

 

PRC law provides that anyone wishing to exploit the patent of another must conclude a written licensing contract with the patent holder and pay the patent holder a fee. One rather broad exception to this, however, is where a party possesses the means to exploit a patent for inventions or utility models but cannot obtain a license from the patent holder on reasonable terms and in a reasonable period of time, the PRC State Intellectual Property Office is authorized to grant a compulsory license. A compulsory license can also be granted where a national emergency or any extraordinary state of affairs occurs or where the public interest so requires. The patent holder may appeal such a decision within three months from receiving notification by filing suit in the People’s Court.

 

PRC law defines patent infringement as the exploitation of a patent without the authorization of the patent holder. A patent holder who believes his patent is being infringed may file a civil suit or file a complaint with a local PRC Intellectual Property Administrative Authority, which may order the infringer to stop the infringing acts. A preliminary injunction may be issued by the People’s Court upon the patentee’s or the interested parties’ request before instituting any legal proceedings or during the proceedings. Evidence preservation and property preservation measures are also available both before and during the litigation. Damages in the case of patent infringement is calculated as either the loss suffered by the patent holder arising from the infringement or the benefit gained by the infringer from the infringement. If it is difficult to ascertain damages in this manner, damages may be determined with reference to the license fee under a contractual license.

 

63

Trademark

 

The PRC Trademark Law, adopted in 1982 and revised in 1993, 2001 and 2013, with its implementation rules adopted in 2002, protects registered trademarks. The Trademark Office of SAICthe State Administration of Industry and Commerce handles trademark registrations and grants trademark registrations for a term of ten years, which is subject to rollover by application.

 

C.Organizational Structure

 

We currentlyAs of December 31, 2017, we conduct our business primarily through the following significant subsidiaries as of the date of this annual report:subsidiaries:

 

·ReneSola Zhejiang, which wasRenesola (Zhejiang) PV Power Co., Ltd.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in China in August 2003, acquired by us in April 2006 and is currently2017 to hold our principal operating company engaged in wafer manufacturing in China;Chinese subsidiaries.

 

·Zhejiang ReneSola America, which wasInvestment Ltd.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the State of Delaware, the United StatesChina in November 2006February 2015 to facilitateengage in trading and investments in solar industry, as well as holding our procurement of silicon raw materialsproject companies in North America;China.

 

·ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., which was incorporated in Singapore in March 2007 to facilitate our polysilicon procurement and product sales outside of China;

·Sichuan ReneSola, which was incorporated in China in August 2007 to engage in the production of polysilicon;

·ReneSola Jiangsu, which was incorporated in China in November 2005 and acquired by us in May 2009 to engage in the production of solar cells and modules;

·Zhejiang ReneSola System Integration Ltd., which was incorporated in China in April 2010 to engage in the production and sale of crucibles, steel wires and silicon carbon powder;

·ReneSola Deutschland GmbH, which was incorporated in Germany in September 2011, to engage in the sales of module, cell and wafer, as well as the operation of solar power projects;

·ReneSola New Energy S.A.R.L which was: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in Luxembourg in March 2012 to engage in trading and investments in solar industry, as well as holding our solar power projects;

 

·ReneSola Investment Management Ltd which was.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the British Virgin Islands in December 2014 to engage in investments in solar industry, as well as holding our solar power projects;

·ReneSola Power, Inc., which was incorporated in the United States in July 2015 to engage in investments in solar industry, as well as holding our solar power projects; and

 

·Sichuan Bobo Electric Power Engineering Ltd.: our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in China in January 2017 to conduct EPC business; and

·ReneSola UK Limited, which wasPower Holdings LLC. : our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the United Kingdom in April 2013States to engage in the sales of modules, as well as the operation ofto conduct solar power projects.project development business.

 

In addition to the significant subsidiaries above, we also have other principal subsidiaries incorporated in different jurisdictions.

 


The following diagram illustrates our current corporate structure, including our significant subsidiaries, as of the date of this annual report:report.

 

 

 

The diagram above omits the names of subsidiaries that are insignificant to us individually and in the aggregate. For a complete list of our principal subsidiaries as of the date of this annual report, see Exhibit 8.1 to this annual report.us.

64

 

D.Property, Plants and Equipment

 

We conductAfter our researchdisposal of manufacturing business, our property, plants and developmentequipment is primarily our projects related infrastructures and manufacturing of solar wafers at our facilities in Jiashan, Zhejiang Province, where we occupied a site area of approximately 401,060 square metersassets, such as of December 31, 2015. On this site, there are manufacturing facilitiespower stations and office premises occupying an area of approximately 271,184 square meters.ancillary infrastructures. For more details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Solar Power Projects.”

 

We conductCertain of our researchproject infrastructures are pledged to secure our bank borrowings and development and manufacturingequities of polysilicon atcertain of our facilitiesproject companies are pleaded in Meishan, Sichuan Province, where we occupied a site area of approximately 1,011,155 square meters as of December 31, 2015. We have subsequently sold one piece of land in Meishan of approximately 48,867 square meters in the first quarter of 2016.

Our cell and module manufacturing facilities are located at Yixing, Jiangsu Province, where we occupied a site area of approximately 179,500 square meters as of December 31, 2015.

Except as noted otherwise, we own the facilities completed and under construction and the right to use the relevant land for the durations described below. We also include information relating to the capacity of and major equipment at our facilities below. We believe that our existing facilities, together our facilities under construction, are adequate for our operation in 2016.


  Facility  
Construction
Area 
(square
  Duration  of
Land
 Annual Manufacturing
Capacity
as of December 31,
  Expected
Annual
Manufacturing
Capacity
as of
December 31,
  Major
Products No.  meters)  Use Right 2013  2014  2015  2016  Equipment
Monocrystalline ingots and wafers  1   42,000  January 2007 to
November 2053
(a plot of
22,000 square
meters); May
2006 to
November 2053
(a plot of
18,000 square
meters); and
October 2006
to October
2056 (a plot of
23,000 square
meters)
  200 MW   200 MW    200 MW   200 MW  Monocrystalline
furnaces, NTC
wire saws
   3   46,000  July 2007 to
July 2057
                  
Multicrystalline ingots and wafers  2   27,000  January 2007 to
December 2056
  1,800 MW   1,800 MW   1,800 MW   2,200 MW  ALD
multicrystalline
furnaces,
TOKYO ROPE
multicrystalline
furnaces,
Zhejiang
Jinggong
multicrystalline
furnaces,
HCT wire saws
and Meyer
Burger wire
saws
   4   50,000  May 2008 to
April 2058
                  
Polysilicon  5   75,000  August
2008 to
August
2058
  6,000 metric tons   6,000 metric tons   6,000 metric tons   6,000 metric tons  Deposition
reactors,
rectifying
tower and
hydrogenation
reactor
Cells  6   42,958  February
2008 to
December
2056
  240 MW   240 MW    240 MW   240 MW  

Cell printing,
testing and
sorting

equipment

Modules            1,200 MW   1,200 MW   1,200 MW   1,200 MW   

capital lease arrangements. As of December 31, 2015,2016, long-term borrowings of $28,835,700 was joint guaranteed by two subsidiaries of the Company. As of December 31, 2017, short-term borrowings of $307.6 million$6,605,894 and long-term borrowings of $9.3 million$ 32,513,900 were secured by property, plant and equipment with carrying amounts of $511.1 million, investment of $188.5 million and prepaid land use rights of $34.6million. In addition, $318.0 million of borrowings werejoint guaranteed by the personalCompany and its two subsidiaries. The short-term borrowings of $6,605,894 were also secured by all the shares or ownership interests of the borrower, and project assets owned with carrying value equivalent to 130% of Mr. Xianshou Li,the principal.

The project construction processes for our chairmansolar power projects may generate noise, waste water, gaseous wastes and chief executive officer,other wastes. We believe we are in compliance with present environmental protection requirements in all material respects and his family, as of December 31, 2015, respectively.have all material environmental permits necessary to conduct our business. For more details, see “¾B. Business Overview—Environmental Matters.”


ITEM 4A.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” or in other parts of this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

A.Operating Results

 

Overview

 

We arePrior to September 2017, we were a leading global brandfully-integrated solar project developer and technology provider of energy-efficient products based in China. Capitalizing on our proprietary technologies, economies of scale, low cost production capabilities, technical innovations and know-how and leveraging our in-house polysilicon, wafer and module manufacturing capabilities, we provide our customers with high quality, cost competitive solar power products and processing services. We provideprovided high quality solar power products, including solar wafers, solar cells, solar modules and solar power projects, to a global network of suppliers and customers, which includesincluded leading global manufacturers of solar wafers, cells and modules and distributors, installers and end users of solar modules.

We sell solar wafers primarilyalso provided processing services to solar cell and module manufacturers globally.our customers. In 2015 a significant portion of our wafer sales were made to companies based in Asia, primarily to leading solar cell and module companies in China, South Korea, India and Singapore. The majority of our module sales in 2015 were made to distributors across the globe including distributors in Europe, the United States and the Asia-Pacific region. We have begun to refine our module sales strategy to sell directly to end users in order to enhance our pricing power and increase our profit margin. We believe that one of the most cost-effective and innovative ways to improve module efficiencies is through enhanced wafer technologies, an area where we have historical expertise. In addition, we have continued to focus on implementing various cost reduction programs and have reduced our silicon consumption rate and non-silicon wafer processing costs. We have greatly expanded our manufacturing capacity since we began the production of solar wafers. We believe we possess one of the largest solar wafer manufacturing facilities in China based on production capacity as of December 31, 2015. In 2013, 2014 and 2015,2016, we shipped 3,218.0 MW, 2,878.22,748.8 MW and 2,748.82,603.3 MW, respectively, of solar power products.

 

Starting from our inception, we were manufacturers of solar wafers, polysilicon and solar modules. Starting from early 2014, we began to expandexpanded our operations into the broaderthe global energy efficient products and services business and into downstream solar power projects. projects in overseas markets. In September 2017, we completed a non-cash restructuring following which , among other things, substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business were transferred into ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Upon the closing of this restructuring, all the issued shares of ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd were transferred to our chairman and chief executive officer. As a result, we have transformed into a solar project developer and operator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the world. As of December 31, 2017, our debt-to-asset ratio, which is total liabilities divided by total assets, was improved and decreased to 73.0% from 93.9% as of December 31, 2016.

While the project development business continues to be our important strategy for the foreseeable future, we remain focused on our retailalso intend to retain more projects in selected regions and residential-oriented business development,become an IPP as we selectively pursuerealize high quality projects are unduplicated resources. Our competitive advantages lie in small-scale projects with high PPA/FIT price in diversified jurisdictions which we believe are of attractive return and low-risk solar power projectwill be the trend for the development of the industry. We also continue to pursue opportunities especially distributed generation projects, and have been building our new solar portfolio comprised of thosein these small-scale projects in the United Kingdom, North America, Japan, and other emerging markets. In 2015,diversified regions.

65

As of December 31, 2017, we sold three utility-scalecompleted 564 MW of solar power projects, totaling approximately 57.5including 270 MW new installation in the United KingdomChina (including EPC service). In 2017, we sold and three utility-scaledelivered 109.4 MW of solar power projects totaling approximately 1.8 MW in Japan. We alsoprojects; and entered into sales agreements in connection with the sale of one utility-scale26.7 MW additional solar power projects. We were operating approximately 212 MW solar power projects totaling approximately 13.5globally as of December 31, 2017, including 187 MW in China, and recorded electricity generation revenue from these projects. As of December 31, 2017, we had 546 MW late-stage pipeline, including 125 MW in China, with commercial operation date, or COD, within 2018 and 2019, of which 92.2 MW of the United Kingdom in 2015. solar power projects were under construction.

For details of our project development pipeline, see “Item 4. Information on the Company¾B. Business Overview—Our Solar Power Projects⸺Project Development.Pipeline.

 

At the end of September 2013, we concluded that our efforts to sufficiently reduce the cost of polysilicon production as compared to the prevailing market price were not successful. After conducting a further internal assessment we determined that it was no longer feasible to operate the Phase I facility without incurring a loss and to recognize the impairment charge in our wafer segment accordingly. Production at the Phase I facility of our polysilicon manufacturing facility in Sichuan Province was permanently discontinued in October 2013. As a result, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $194.7 million on long-lived assets associated with our Sichuan polysilicon factory. Our remaining Phase II polysilicon facility currently has an annual polysilicon manufacturing capacity of 6,000 metric tons. After eliminating our Phase I facility, our remaining in-house polysilicon production is cost-efficient compared to the prevailing market price of polysilicon, which we believe will help our overall profitability. In addition, we believe the discontinuation will help reduce our power consumption and depreciation and therefore help to enhance our profitability going forward. Our remaining Phase II polysilicon facility was running at full capacity and helped to contribute positively to our cash flows in 2015. While the solar sector remains highly competitive and subject to political uncertainties, we believe that our international approach to our module business and continuing investments in new technologies will support our long-term goals.


Our net revenues increased from $1,519.6continuing operations decreased from $116.3 million in 20132015 to $1,561.5$80.5 million in 20142016 and decreasedincreased to $1,282.0$103.0 million in 2015.2017. We recorded an operating income of $29.3$6.6 million and a net income of $34.5 million in 2017, compared to an operating income of $2.3 million and a net loss of $34.7 million in 2016 and an operating income of $16.3 million and a net loss of $5.1 million in 2015, compared2015. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects¾A. Operating Results¾Overview of Financial Results¾Net Revenues”.

As a result of our business restructuring in September 2017, bank borrowings in an aggregate amount in excess of RMB3 billion ($461 million) related to an operating incomethe transferred businesses, or the Bank Borrowings, will no longer be consolidated on our balance sheet as all have been assumed by the buyer, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. agreed to cancel approximately $217.4 million of $8.2accounts and other payable owed by us and we issued 180 million ordinary shares to ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Mr. Li, our chairman and chief executive officer, and his spouse have provided personal guarantee for a net lossmajority of $33.6 million in 2014, and an operating lossthe Bank Borrowings. In addition, under the agreement, for a period of $221.4 million and10 years following the closing, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. agreed to offer us a net losspreferential right to acquire any products of $258.9 million in 2013.ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., including any polysilicon, solar wafers, solar cells or solar modules, on the same terms as such products are offered to any third party.

Major Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

 

Our future growth is driven by among others, industry demand for solar power products and power, our ability to win market share from our competitors our ability to manage our manufacturing capacity and production output, and our ability to improve operational efficiencies.develop and operate our solar solar projects. Significant factors that affect the financial performance and results of operations of our solar power productsprojects are:

 

·imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing orders;industry demand;

 

·industry demand and product pricing;

·manufacturing capabilities;

·advancements in process technologies;

 

·availability and prices of raw materials;solar modules and other components;

 

·government subsidies and incentives; and

 

·solar power project development.development;

·operation of solar power project and generation of electricity; and

·seasonality variations.

 

Imposition of Anti-dumping and Countervailing Orders

Trade actions initiated in the United States and other jurisdictions, and the resulting anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed on solar imports in those jurisdictions have caused disruption in the solar markets, resulted in additional costs to our customers and materially and adversely affected our business. The 2011 anti-dumping and countervailing duties investigation in the United States resulted in the imposition of certain tariffs on solar modules with cell components produced in China. The 2012 investigations of anti-dumping and countervailing duties in the European Union resulted in setting a price floor for Chinese-made solar products.

On December 31, 2013, another petition was filed with the USDOC to initiate an anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigation regarding certain Chinese solar products. On March 25, 2014, we received a letter from the USDOC in which we were named as one of the mandatory respondents related to the anti-dumping investigation. We have fully cooperated and intend to continue to cooperate. According to the World Trade Organization rules, the USDOC has to guarantee that the export quantities of the sampled companies accounted for a certain percentage of the total export sales of China. It is common practice for the USDOC to select certain companies with relatively large market share in the United States to participate in the investigation. We fully cooperated with the investigation proceedings to pursue the best outcome for us, as well as the industry. On December 16, 2014, the USDOC determined that imports of certain CSPV products were dumped in the United States from China and Taiwan and imports of certain CSPV products from China received countervailing subsidies. Following the USDOC determination, on January 21, 2015, USITC determined that imports of certain CSPV products from mainland China and Taiwan materially injured the domestic industry. As a result of the USITC’s affirmative determinations, the USDOC issued countervailing duty orders on imports of these products from mainland China and anti-dumping duty orders on imports of these products from China and Taiwan. On February 18, 2015, the USDOC amended its final affirmative countervailing duty determination to correct an error regarding the inclusion of a subsidy program that was not properly reflected on the record of the investigation. Under the amended final determination of the USDOC, we received a final dumping cash deposit rate of 78.42% and a final countervailing cash deposit rate of 38.43% for our U.S. imports. The U.S. system imposes final duties retroactively, so that the actual duty rates at which our U.S. imports will be finally assessed may differ from the announced cash deposit rates based on the completion of administrative reviews which will be conducted related to these anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders. On April 7, 2016, the USDOC initiated its first administrative review, which will assess duties for our imports into the United States covering the period July 31, 2014 through January 31, 2016. The first administrative review is anticipated to conclude by around the first half of 2017.


In the interest of our customers and shareholders, we have discontinued our shipments to the United States of the products subject to the 78.42% dumping cash deposit rate and the 38.43% final countervailing cash deposit rate since March 2014. We believe that such discontinuation of shipments would not have a material adverse impact on our financial results. We have overseas capacity through our network of OEM facilities that we can use to continue shipping to the United States without any potential tariff risk. While we oppose the petition raised against certain products from China, we are well prepared and well positioned to meet this challenge and will continue to support U.S. consumers with our top quality module products that are not the subject of the trade proceedings. We expect that we can continue to leverage our global presence, and optimize our geographic distribution to our advantage.

For more details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing orders in one or more markets may result in additional costs to our customers and disruptions in such markets and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial conditions and prospects.”

Industry Demand and Product Pricing

 

Our revenue growth largely depends on market demand for solar power products.projects. Demand for solar power productsprojects is influenced by macroeconomic factors such as government regulations and support of the solar power industry, the global economic situation, the supply and prices of other energy products, such as oil, coal and natural gas, as well as government regulations and policies on the electric utility industry. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

 

Our product

66

Product Pricing

The prices for our solar power projects are based onaffected by a variety of factors, including polysilicon costs of solar modules and other components which we need to develop our solar power projects, supply and demand conditions globally, the quality of our products, our pricing strategy, and the terms of our customer contracts, including sales volumes, and the terms on which certain customers supply us with silicon raw materials under buy-and-sell arrangements, taking into account the strength and history of our relationship with said customer. The solar industry has seen an increase in demand for solar power products due in part to the improvement of global economic conditions since 2009, when the global economic downturn had a material impact on the demand for solar power products. Despite a recovery in demand, the prices of solar power products have been volatile in recent years due to the unstable supply of solar power products. Moreover, the solar industry is expected to continue to be highly competitive. Increased production efficiencies and improved technologies may further reduce polysilicon costs and other silicon raw materials, which have already declined significantly over the past few years. In addition, Europe’s challenging financing environment resulted in weaker demand in Europe for most of 2011 and 2012, traditionally the solar industry’s most important market. In 2013, the global oversupply situation was mitigated due to industry restructuring and integration, resulting in a recovery in the solar industry reflected by an increase in the average selling prices throughout the solar value chain, including but not limited to polysilicon, wafers, cells, and module prices. In 2014, the average selling price throughout the solar value chain continued to stabilize, with module prices decreasing during the second half of the year, mainly as a result of foreign exchanges fluctuations. In 2015, the market price of polysilicon declined from $21 per kilogram to $14 per kilogram, while the average selling price of cell started to rise in the middle of the year, the average selling price of wafer started to rise in the fourth quarter and the average selling price of modules slightly decreased. We believe the module pricing trends, together with the lowering of costs throughout most of the solar power value chain, will continue and will further improve end-user affordability and increase demand for solar-generated electricity. In order to achieve positive margins, we will need to continue to control and reduce our costs of revenues and operating costs. In addition, fluctuations in exchange rates could affect our net profit margins and could result in foreign exchange losses and operating losses.contracts. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on your investment” and “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Risk.Our Business.

Wafer Manufacturing Capability Complemented by Polysilicon, Cell and Module Manufacturing Capabilities

We continue to execute our strategy to enhance our competitive platform built on product quality, cost-effective manufacturing capabilities, technology and brand recognition in our solar power product business supported by integrated manufacturing of in-house polysilicon and solar cells. Through reducing costs, better quality control and shortening our production cycle, we capitalize on increasing demand for our high quality products by leveraging and strengthening our core customer relationships to further drive revenue growth. We believe the economies of scale resulting from our increasing manufacturing capacity have enhanced, and will continue to enhance, our cost structure and manufacturing efficiency. We believe our vertically integrated model and integrated manufacturing capabilities allow us to ensure the quality of our solar power products and reduce our reliance on the quality assurances of third-party suppliers. Moreover, our vertical integration allows us to gain an early understanding of trends in PV product pricing, better anticipate market conditions and take advantage of market opportunities more quickly and efficiently. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview” for the updates on our annual solar wafer manufacturing capacity, our annual cell and module manufacturing capacities and our polysilicon facility.


Advancements in Process Technologies

Advancements in our process technologies are important to our financial performance as they improve production yield, reduce manufacturing costs and enhance the quality and performance of our products. We have developed proprietary technologies in our wafer manufacturing processes. For example, we are able to produce more monocrystalline ingots by adding silicon raw materials in the furnaces after each production cycle without waiting for the furnaces to cool. This innovation enables us to increase the yield of our ingots, reduce electricity costs and enhance the utilization rate of our furnaces and consumables, such as crucibles. We have also modified certain manufacturing equipment design in both ingot and wafer slicing production, developed equipment manufactured locally and developed advanced processes, which have resulted in improved production yield and higher quality of wafers. We plan to further reduce our wafer processing cost per watt in the future through, among other things, development of new equipment used to manufacture ingots, optimizing supply chain management, process improvements, improvements in polysilicon production and in house production of certain key consumables.

 

Availability and Prices of Raw MaterialsSolar Modules and other Components

 

Polysilicon is the primary raw material usedWe use solar modules to make crystalline silicondevelop our solar wafers, thepower projects. The market price of whichsolar modules may fluctuate as a result of economic conditions and the relative supply and demand for polysilicon. The market price of polysilicon increased due to the market recovery to between $17 and $20 per kilogram in the fourth quarter of 2013. In 2014, such price stabilized at around approximately $20 per kilogram. In 2015, the market price of polysilicon declined from $21 per kilogram to $14 per kilogram.solar module.

 

We are able to partially mitigate the risk of volatility in the price of polysilicon and its effect on our profit margins through our internal polysilicon production, which, however, also exposes us to the possibility of impairments. We also mitigate the risk by sourcing polysiliconsolar modules from various sources including long-term supply contracts, which are often renegotiated,and by entering primarily into short term contracts customers under processing services and spot purchases in China and internationally. Our short-term and spot purchase contracts and orders generally reflect the prevailing market prices.

In addition, we secure feedstock from some of our customers and sell solar wafers or ingots to them in return. We also provide some of our customers with wafer processing services. These transactions enhance the utilization rate of our manufacturing capacity, mitigate the risk of raw material price increases and strengthen our strategic partnerships with customers.

 

Government Subsidies and Incentives

 

We believe that growth of the solar industry depends largely on the availability and scale of government subsidies and economic incentives. Today, the cost of solar power substantially exceeds the cost of electricity generated from conventional fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. As a result, national and local governmental bodies in Germany, Spain, Italy, France, North America and Japan, among others,many countries have provided subsidies and economic incentives in the form of feed-in tariffs,FITs, rebates, tax credits and other incentives to end-users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of solar power products to promote the use of solar energy and to reduce dependence on other forms of energy. These government subsidies and economic incentives, have been in the form of capital cost rebates, feed-in tariffs,FITs, tax credits, net metering and other incentives to end users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of solar power products. products, have been reducing.

The demand for our solar power products, particularly solar modules,projects in our current, targeted and potential markets iscan be affected significantly by the availability of such government subsidies and economic incentives. However, government subsidies and economic incentives could be reduced or eliminated altogether.


A significant reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government subsidies and incentive programs, especially those in our target markets, could cause demand for our solar power products and their prices to decline. The decline of the prices of modules may otherwise benefit our revenue to decline,downstream solar power projects by reducing the construction costs, and may in turn alleviate the negative impact. Nevertheless, significant reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government subsidies and incentive programs may still have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

Solar Power Project Development

 

In 2015, 2016 and 2017, we recognized $110.7 million, $77.4 million and $64.8 million of net revenues from continuing operations from the sales of our solar power projects, representing approximately 8.6%95.2%, 96.1% and 63.0% of our total net revenues. Almost all of these revenues came from the sale of solar power projects developed by us.continuing operations. Our solar power project development activities have expanded over the past several years through a combination of organic growth and acquisition of project development rights. We develop our solar power projects with a view to selling them to third party purchasers.them. Our ability to identify and engage credit-worthy purchasers timely and to negotiate favorable purchase price and payment terms directly affects our profitability. If we are unable to identify and appropriate buyerspurchasers in the short term, we may also determine to own and operate some of the projects from time to time and generate revenue by generating and selling electricity to the grid companies. We operate and maintain these projects by our own operation and maintenance team to ensure the uninterrupted generation of electricity and to prolong the usable life of solar modules and other equipment. We expect that our revenues from the sale of solar power projects and its importance to our overall business will continue to increase in the following years.

 

Solar power projects developments involve numerous risks and uncertainties. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We face uncertainties in connection with the implementation of our business strategy to transform our business focus from wafer and module manufacturing to global energy efficient products and services and downstream solar power projects.”

 

Operation of Solar Power Project and Generation of Electricity

Our current business strategy includes plans to further grow our IPP portfolio. Revenues from the IPP business may be affected by the demand of our electricity, our ability to generate the electricity, the electricity sales price and the operation costs. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.” We generated significant portions of revenues from our EPC business in 2017 but it will not be part of our future growth strategies.

67

Seasonality Variations

Changes in climate, geography, weather patterns, and other phenomena in the regions where we operate may significantly affect our business. For example, solar power projects depend on the amount and intensity of sunlight, which is affected by weather and climate conditions. As a result, our electricity generation and amount of electricity sold and therefore the revenue generated from our IPP business tend to be higher during periods or seasons when there is more irradiation. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Seasonal variations may influence our results of operations.”

Overview of Financial Results

 

Net Revenues

 

Historically, we derived revenue primarily from sales of solar wafers. However, since 2012, our module saleswafers and solar modules. We have contributed the majority of our revenues. We also beganbegun to sell solar power projects and recognize revenue from sale of solar power projects in a separate business segment since 2015. After the completion of our business restructuring in 2015.September 2017, we have transformed into a solar project developer and operator, with our revenues mainly generated from our solar power projects. Set forth below is the breakdown of our net revenues by segment in absolute amount and as a percentage of total net revenues for the periods indicated.

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands, except percentages) 
Net revenues                        
Solar wafers(1)(2) $366,161   24.1% $223,489   14.3% $225,633   17.6%
Solar modules (3)(4)(5)  1,141,964   75.1   1,329,268   85.1   940,011   73.3 
Solar power projects(6)(7)  11,510   0.8   8,740   0.6   116,387   9.1 
Total $1,519,635   100.0% $1,561,497   100.0% $1,282,031   100.0%

Prior to the disposal of discontinued business on September 27, 2017, which have been presented as discontinued operations for all the periods presented herein, the Company operated and managed three principal reportable segments, Wafer, Cell and module, and Solar power projects. The Wafer segment involves the manufacture and sales of monocrystalline and multicrystalline solar wafers and processing services. The Cell and module segment involves manufacture and sale of PV cells and modules, and service revenue from tolling arrangements. The solar power projects segment is a newly formed segment in year 2015 which involves solar power project development, EPC services and electricity revenue generation. Ancillary revenues and expenses and other unallocated costs and expenses are recorded in other.

Pursuant to the disposal of the manufacturing business and LED distribution business on September 27, 2017 presented in discontinued operations for all the periods presented herein, the Company further separated the solar power project segment into three reportable segments, including solar power project development, EPC services and electricity revenue generation. Ancillary revenues and expenses and other unallocated costs and expenses are recorded in other.

  Year ended December 31, 2015 
  

Solar power project

development

  

Electricity

revenue

generation

  Other  Total 
Net revenue  110,737,934   5,551,742   41,260   116,330,936 
Gross profit  20,707,899   2,308,921   18,336   23,035,156 

  Year ended December 31, 2016 
  

Solar power project

development

  

Electricity

revenue

generation

  Other  Total 
Net revenue  77,372,737   3,131,997   -   80,504,734 
Gross profit  6,432,290   800,591   -   7,232,881 

  Year ended December 31, 2017 
  

Solar power

project

development

  

Electricity

revenue

generation

  

EPC

Services

  Other  Total 
Net  revenue  64,837,042   12,247,320   25,853,288   36,349   102,973,999 
Gross profit  3,575,775   7,031,670   3,524,310   -   14,131,755 

 

(1)68Included approximately $315.0 million, $182.5 million and $163.7 million from sales of solar wafers in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

 

(2)Included approximately $51.1 million, $41.0 million and $61.9 million from sales of other materials in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(3)Included approximately $1,116.9 million, $1,309.0 million and $920.3 million from sales of solar modules in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(4)Included approximately $23.9 million, $12.4 million and $8.3 million from sales of solar cells in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(5)Included approximately $1.2 million, $7.8 million and $11.5 million from service revenue from tolling arrangements with respect to solar modules in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(6)Included nil, nil and approximately $110.7 million from sales of solar power projects for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(7)Included approximately $11.5 million, $8.7 million and $5.6 million from sales of electricity generated by our power systems in China for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

Our net revenues derived from product sales are net of VAT, sales returns and exchanges. Factors affecting our net revenues derived from product sales include our unit sales volume and average selling price. We decreased wafer shipments in 2013 because we used more of our wafer manufacturing output for our own module manufacturing to support our business strategy to become an integrated module provider. In 2014 and 2015, we continued to shift our business focus towards the higher margin module business by using most of the wafers produced internallyAverage selling prices throughout the solar value chain, including but not limited to polysilicon, wafers, cells, and module prices, increased in 2013 because the solar market recovered gradually due to industry restructuring and integration. In 2014, the average selling prices throughout the solar value chain remained stable, however, due to foreign exchange fluctuations, module prices declined gradually in the second half of 2014. In 2015, the market price of polysilicon declined from $21 per kilogram to $14 per kilogram, while the average selling price of cell started to rise in the middle of the year, the average selling price of wafer started to rise in the fourth quarter and the average selling price of modules slightly decreased.

Sales of wafers to our major customers are typically made under long-term sales contracts and market spot sales. Most of our current wafer sales, particularly our sales to major wafer customers, are made under purchase orders based on the spot market rates. Long-term sales contracts typically provide for the sales volume and price of our solar wafers for each year of the contract term. Compared to spot sales contracts, we believe our sales contracts not only provide us with better visibility into future revenues, but also help us enhance relationships with our customers. However, the pricing terms are subject to renegotiation in situations where the market benchmark price for solar wafers changes more than a certain percentage from the contracted price. Our sales contracts typically require our customers to make a prepayment depending on their credit status, market demand and the term of the contracts, with the remaining price to be paid before shipment or within a short period after shipment, depending on the customer’s credit worthiness and historical relationship with us. Our ability to require prepayment from our customers primarily depends on industry demand and supply.

Our module shipments were 1.7 GW, 2.0 GW and 1.6 GW in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. In 2013, our module shipment exceeded our wafer shipment for the first time in our company’s history, due to our business strategy of transitioning from a wafer manufacturer to an integrated module manufacturer. Our module shipments continued to exceed our wafer shipments since then. We sell our modules primarily to distributors and power plant developers. Our focus on which type of customers depends largely on the demand in the specific markets. In 2014, our top five module customers accounted for 28.9% of our module sales and 24.2% of our total net revenues, and our largest module customer accounted for approximately 9.3% of our module sales and 7.8% of our total net revenues. In 2015, our top five module customers accounted for 31.6% of our module sales and 22.7% of our net revenues, and our largest module customer accounted for approximately 15.8% of our module sales and 11.3% of our net revenues. We sell our modules through spot orders, short-term contracts with terms of less than one year and framework agreements. The prices for most orders, contracts, and framework agreements are based on the then market prices and trends.

We began to sell solar power projects and recognize revenue from sales of solar power projects in a separate business segment in 2015. Our revenues from the sale of solar power projects accounted for 8.6% of our total net revenues in 2015. Revenue recognition for our solar power projects are, in many cases, not linear in nature due to the timing of when all relevant revenue recognition criteria have been met. Our revenue recognition policies for the sales of solar power projects are described in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Critical Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition.”

 

Geographical Distribution

 

In 2013, 2014 and 2015,September 2017, we completed a significant portiondisposition of our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, sales were made to companies based in Asia, primarily to leading solar cell and solar module companies in China, Singapore, South Korea and India.manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business.

 

A majority of our module sales in 2014After the business restructuring, we have transformed into a solar project developer and 2015 were made to distributors located in Europe. Solar power manufacturers like us have capitalized on government and regulatory policies foroperator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the promotion of solar power in many jurisdictions. In order to continue growing our sales and to reduce our exposure to any particular market segment, we intend to broaden our geographic presence and customer base. However, Europe remained our most important market in 2015.


In 2015, we sold three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 57.5 MW in the United Kingdom and three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 1.8 MW in Japan. We also entered into sales agreements in connection with the sale of one utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 13.5 MW in the United Kingdom in 2015.world.

 

The following table sets forthsummarizes the breakdownCompany’s revenues generated by the geographic location of our net revenues by geographic market, in absolute amount and as a percentage of total net revenues, for the periods indicated.customers:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands, except percentages) 
    
China $417,469   27.5% $227,182   14.5% $264,803   20.7%
Other Asia Pacific Regions  337,830   22.2   554,635   35.5   535,853   41.8 
Asia Pacific Regions Total  755,299   49.7   781,818   50.1   800,656   62.5 
Europe  396,125   26.1   514,252   32.9   331,698   25.9 
America  236,935   15.6   170,718   10.9   50,176   3.9 
South Africa  18,432   1.2   13,912   0.9   17,069   1.3 
Others  112,844   7.4   80,797   5.2   82,432   6.4 
Total $1,519,635   100.0% $1,561,497   100.0% $1,282,031   100.0%
  Years ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
China (including Hong Kong and Taiwan)  -   -   67,533,887 
America  41,260   -   18,323,947 
Japan  5,719,672   9,175,391   - 
Bulgaria  3,083,823   652,559   - 
Romania  2,467,920   2,393,030   4,844,238 
England  105,018,261   68,283,754   7,271,370 
Turkey  -   -   4,995,648 
France  -   -   4,909 
Total  116,330,936   80,504,734   102,973,999 

 

Cost of Revenues

 

Our cost of revenues for continuing operations consists of costs for:

·polysilicon raw materials;

·consumables, including crucibles, steel sawing wires, slurry, glass and EVA film;

·direct labor costs, including salaries and benefits for our manufacturing personnel;

·overhead costs, including equipment maintenance and utilities such as electricity and water used in manufacturing;

·depreciation of manufacturing facilities and equipment;

·inventory write-down and contractor processing fees;

 

·development costs (including interconnection fees and permitting costs) of solar power projects;

 

·acquisition costs of solar power projects, if applicable;

 

·project management and engineering costs;

 

·EPC costs (consisting of costs of the components of solar power projects other than solar modules, such as inverters, electrical and mounting hardware, trackers, grid interconnection equipment, wiring and other devices);

 

·interest costs capitalized for solar power projects during construction period; and

 

·site-specific costs.costs

All of our costs relating to solar power products businesses increased in 2013 as we expanded our manufacturing capacity and increased our sales volume, then decreased slightly in 2014 and continued to decrease in 2015 due to our efforts to reduce costs of manufacturing. The increase in our polysilicon feedstock costs from 2013 to 2014 was attributable to increases in the volume of raw materials purchased. In 2013, the market prices for raw materials continued to decline, while the average selling prices of our products and other inventory also declined significantly.As a result, we recorded inventory write-downs of $0.7 million in 2013 which reflected the decreased value of our feedstock, work in progress and finished goods. In 2014, the market price for raw materials and the average selling prices of our products remained stable. We recorded an inventory write-down of $0.8 million in 2014. Before 2014, we classified warranty expenses as part of cost of revenues in the income statement. From the first quarter of 2014, we changed our accounting classification of warranty expenses from cost of revenues to selling expenses in order to better reflect our global OEM business operations and align our accounting policy to industry peers. The reclassification has been adopted retrospectively and the comparative consolidated income statement amounts for the years ended December 31, 2010 to 2013 have been adjusted accordingly. In 2015, the market prices for raw materials decreased, while the average selling prices of our products also decreased. We recorded inventory write-down of $0.6 million in 2015.

For utility-scale solar power projects built by us, we may need to perform an energy generation performance test during the first and second year of the solar power plant’s operation. Such a test is designed to demonstrate that the actual energy generation for the first and second year meets or exceeds the modeled energy expectation, after certain adjustments and exclusions. If there is an underperformance event, determined at the end of the first and second year after substantial completion, we may incur liquidated damages as a percentage of the EPC contract price, and in one case, repurchase the project asset upon buyer's request.

In addition, for utility-scale solar power projects built by us, we may need to perform an energy generation performance test during the first and second year of the solar power plant’s operation. Such a test is designed to demonstrate that the actual energy generation for the first and second year meets or exceeds the modeled energy expectation, after certain adjustments and exclusions. If there is an underperformance event, determined at the end of the first and second year after substantial completion, we may incur liquidated damages as a percentage of the EPC contract price.

 

Gross Margin

 

Our gross margin is affected by changes in our net revenues and cost of revenues. Our net revenues of our solar power product businesses are determined by the average selling price of our products, as well as the volume of products that we are able to sell. Our cost of revenues of our solar power product businessesGross margin from continuing operations is affected by our ability to manage raw material costs and our ability to manage our manufacturing processes efficiently. Our gross margin of solar power project business is affected by1) the gross margin of each individual solar power project we sell, which is determined by our ability to negotiate the sales price as well asand our ability to effectively control the project acquisition and development costs, 2) the gross margin of each individual solar power project we operate, which is determined by the revenues from the sale of electricity generated from our operated solar power projects and our ability to effectively control the operation costs, and 3) the gross margin of each individual EPC services we provide, which is determined by our ability to negotiate the sales price and our ability to effectively control the engineering, procurement and construction costs. Our gross margin from continuing operations decreased from 19.8% in 2015 to 9.0% in 2016, primarily due to the decrease of the gross margin of solar power project we sell, which is due to the increased market price of development costs. Our gross margin increased from 7.4%9.0% in 20132016 to 13.4%13.7% in 2014,2017, primarily due to anthe increase of the gross margin of the electricity revenue, which mainly resulted from the increase of the green certificate revenue from US$1.7 million in 2016 to US$4.2 million in 2017, effect of the average selling pricemargin of modules, increased module shipments13.6% for our new EPC service in 2017, as well as athe offsetting effect of the decrease in the cost of modules and wafers which resulted from our cost control measures. Our gross margin increased from 13.4% in 2014 to 14.7% in 2015, primarily due to a decrease in our wafer processing cost and the higher gross margin associated with ourof solar power project business.we sell.

69

 

Operating Expenses

 

Our operating expenses primarily include sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses and researchgains or losses on disposal of property, plant and development expenses.equipment..

 

Sales and Marketing Expenses

 

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, bonuses and pensions for our sales personnel, commission paid to our sales agents, outbound freight, warranty expenses, share-based compensation expenses and benefits, travel and other sales and marketing expenses.

 

Our sales and marketing expenses for continuing operations increased in 20142016 from 2013,2015, primarily because of the increased commission fee we paid for the sale of green certificates. Our sales and marketing expenses increased our sales efforts, hired additional sales personnel, improved workmanship, and established a minimum power output warranty for our module products consistent within 2017 from 2016, primarily due to the industry averages, targeted new markets and initiated additional marketing programs to build our brand.expansion in solar projects. We expect our sales and marketing expenses to remain stable and potentially slightly decrease in the immediate future. Our sales and marketing expenses decreased in 2015 from 2014, primarily due to a decrease in sales volume of our solar power products.


We began selling solar modules in June 2009 after our acquisition of ReneSola Jiangsu. Module sales typically carry a warranty for minimum power output of up to 25 years following the date of sale. We also provide warranties for our solar modules against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of ten years from the date of sale. We accrued warranty expenses from solar module sales of approximately $9.8 million in 2013, $13.1 million in 2014 and $8.8 million in 2015. Our warranties were calculated based on 1.0% of the current average selling price of our solar modules.

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, bonuses and benefits for our administrative and management personnel, consulting and professional service fees, and travel and related costs ofincurred by our administrative and management personnel. In 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, we recognized share-based compensation expenses in connection with options granted to certain members of our management team. In 2014, our general and administrative expenses increased compared to 2013, primarily because of an increase in the general needs of growing our business and an increased number of international offices and warehouses used to explore international development opportunities. Our general and administrative expenses decreased from 2015 to 2016 and further decreased in 2015 from 2014,2017, primarily due to our effective expense control measures.efforts to reduce consulting and professional service fees. We expect our general and administrative expenses to remain stable in the immediate future.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses primarily relate to equipment and raw materials used in our research and development activities, research and development personnel costs, and other costs related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products and processes.In 2013, 2014 and 2015, our research and development expenses were approximately $46.5 million, $52.6 million and $43.9 million, respectively.

We expect our research and development expenses to remain at approximately the same level in the future as we continue to expand and promote innovations in our processing technologies of manufacturing polysilicon, wafers, cells and modules, as well as ancillary products such as inverters. We plan to continue to focus on improving manufacturing efficiency and reducing our manufacturing costs by enhancing manufacturing yields, which will enable us to deliver higher efficiency products at a lower cost in each segment of our production. In wafer manufacturing, we will continue to focus on improving our Virtus wafers, including improving upon each generation of our Virtus manufacturing technology. In module manufacturing, we will extend our technical know-how in Virtus wafers into manufacturing Virtus modules by using our proprietary Virtus manufacturing technology. We are also exploring new technology in making other types of modules, including glass-glass modules to suit needs in different markets.

 

Other Operating Income and Expenses

 

We also recognized other operating income and expenses from the disposal of fixed assets and land use rights, government grants and forfeitures of advances from customers.

 

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

In 2013, we recognized $202.8 million in non-cash impairment charges, including $194.7 million associated with the long-lived assets of the Phase I Sichuan polysilicon factory. The impairment charge was recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the idled assets. We began a process of upgrading the Phase I factory and integrating the operations with those of Phase II In October 2012 and we conducted trial productions of the integrated production lines of Phase I and Phase II from July 2013 to September 2013. At the end of September 2013, we concluded that our efforts to sufficiently reduce the cost of polysilicon production as compared to the prevailing market price were not successful. After conducting a further internal assessment, we determined that it was no longer feasible to operate the Phase I facility without incurring a loss and to recognize the impairment charge in our wafer segment accordingly. Production at the Phase I facility was permanently discontinued in October 2013. The fair value of the idled assets used to determine the impairment charge was then determined with the assistance of an independent professional third party appraiser, which process was completed in November 2013.


We believe that the decrease of internal supply of polysilicon with the discontinuation can be offset through purchasing from external supplies at a market price lower than the production cost achieved at the discontinued Phase I facility. We believe that we have benefited from lower power consumption and depreciation as a result of the discontinuation of the Phase I facility, which will keep our production cost at or below our target level and result in making our in-house production more cost-efficient as compared with current market prices of polysilicon. The improvement of our Sichuan polysilicon facility has helped to contribute positively to our cash flows in 2015.

In 2014 and 2015, we did not recognize any impairment of long-lived assets.

Non-operating Income and Expenses

 

Our non-operating income and expenses consist primarily of interest income, interest expenses, foreign currency exchange gains or losses, gains on repurchase of convertible bonds,notes, gains or losses on derivatives, gain or loss on disposal of subsidiaries, and fair value change of warrant liability.other loss.

 

Our interest income represents interest on our cash balances. Our interest expenses relate primarily to our short-term and long-term borrowings from banks, less capitalized interest expenses to the extent they relate to our capital expenditures.

 

Our foreign currency exchange gain or loss results from our net exchange gains and losses on our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies during the relevant period. Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency for our subsidiaries in the PRC is Reminbi (“RMB”). The functional currency of our overseas subsidiaries normally is the local currency of the place where the subsidiary is domiciled. Foreign currency transactions have been translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of the transaction. Foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated into our functional currency at exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities have been translated into our reporting currency using exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Income statement items have been translated into our reporting currency using the weighted average exchange rate for the relevant periods. Translation adjustments have been reported as comprehensive income. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, we had foreign currency exchange loss of $0.4 million, $27.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively. The significant foreign exchange loss in 2014 was primarily due to the significant rise of the U.S. dollar against the Euro and Japanese yen during the period. The foreign exchange loss in 2015 was primarily due to the depreciation of Renminbi.

We recorded gains of $0.6 million, gains of $6.1 million and loss of $6.0 million on derivative instruments from foreign currency forward exchange contracts, in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

We recorded gains on disposal of subsidiaries of nil, $8.3 million and nil in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

We recorded nil, gains of $7.0 million and gains of $13.7 million in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, on the repurchase of our convertible bonds due to the repurchase price discount.

We recorded a fair value change of warrant liability of $3.2 million, $7.5 million and $1.3 million in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

 

Taxation

 

Under the current laws of the British Virgin Islands, we are not subject to any income or capital gains tax. Additionally, dividend payments made by us are not subject to any withholding tax in the British Virgin Islands.

70

 

PRC enterprise income tax is calculated primarily on the basis of taxable income determined under PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law. In March 2007, the National People’s Congress of China enacted a new Enterprise Income Tax Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008. In December 2007, the State Council of China promulgated the Implementing Regulation of the new Enterprise Income Tax Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008. The Enterprise Income Tax Law imposes a unified enterprise income tax rate of 25% on all domestic enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises unless they qualify under certain limited exceptions.


Under the Provisional Regulation of China on Value Added Tax and its implementing rules, all entities and individuals engaged in the sale of goods, the provision of processing, repairs and replacement services, and the importation of goods into China are generally required to pay VAT at a rate of 17% of the gross sales proceeds received, less any deductible VAT already paid or borne by the taxpayer. Further, when exporting goods, the exporter is entitled to a partial or full refund of VAT that it has already paid or borne. Accordingly, we are subject to a 17% VAT with respect to our sales of solar wafers in China. Our PRC subsidiaries, ReneSola Zhejiang and ReneSola Jiangsu, are eligible to VAT refund for their export sales. ReneSola Zhejiang has been entitled to a 13% refund on VAT that it had already paid or borne with respect to the export of solar wafers since April 1, 2009.The VAT refund applicable to ReneSola Jiangsu is 17%. Imported raw materials that are used for manufacturing export products and are deposited in bonded warehouses are exempt from import VAT.

 

If it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, we will provide for valuation allowances based on available evidence. As of December 31, 2015,2017, our PRC subsidiaries had net operating losses carry forwards of $291.0$2.0 million (before deferred tax assets valuation allowance), of which $19.5$0.3 million will expire in 2016, $151.92021, $1.7 million will expire in 2017, $54.1 million will expire in 2018, $64.4 million will expire in 2019, and $1.1 million will expire in 2020. ReneSola America had net operating loss carry forwards of $15.0 million, which will expire from 2032 to 2035. ReneSola Deutschland GmbH had net operating loss carry forwards of $13.1 million, which can be offset in future without any time restriction.2022.

 

We consider positive and negative evidence to determine whether some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of recent losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry forward periods, our experience with tax attributes expiring unused and tax planning alternatives. We have considered the following possible sources of taxable income when assessing the realization of deferred tax assets:

 

·tax planning strategies;

 

·future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; and

 

·further taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards.

 

The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible for tax purposes. As a result, we have recognized a valuation allowance against tax loss carry forwards for continuing operations of $134.9 million, $145.3$3.3 million and $126.6$3.2 million as of December 31, 2013, 20142016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

The corporate income tax rate is 25% for our subsidiaries incorporated in PRC. In addition, our subsidiaries ReneSola Zhejiang, ReneSola Jiangsu and Sichuan ReneSola currently qualify as high-new technology enterprises and enjoy a reduced income tax rate of 15%. The current high-new technology enterprise status of ReneSola Zhejiang, ReneSola Jiangsu and Sichuan ReneSola was renewed in 2015 and will be valid for a term of three years until December 31, 2017.

For PRC entities, the qualified research and development expenses incurred by them for development of new technology, new products and new techniques could have a 50% super deduction in addition to the actual expense deductions for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. ReneSola Jiangsu and Sichuan ReneSola are eligible for such R&D super deduction.

In 2015,2016, we had overseas operations in the jurisdiction of the United States, Singapore, Germany, Bulgaria, Australia, Japan, India, Luxembourg,Republic of Romania, theand United Kingdom, South Africa, Croatia, PanamaTurkey, Thailand, Brazil and Korea.France . The corporate income tax rates in these jurisdictions range from 10%0% to 40%34%.

 

Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates

 

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions. We continually evaluate these estimates and assumptions based on the most recently available information, our own historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.


Critical Accounting Policies

An accounting policy is considered critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time such estimate is made, and if different accounting estimates reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following accounting policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity in their application and require us to make significant accounting estimates. The following descriptions of critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and other disclosures included in this annual report.

 

71

Revenue Recognitionrecognition

 

Solar Power Productspower project development

 

We sell solar power products including virgin polysilicon, monocrystalline and multicrystalline solar wafers and PV cells and modules. We also enter into agreements to process silicon materials into silicon ingots and wafers, and to process PV cells into modules for customers. We recognize revenues when persuasive evidencea) Sale of an arrangement exists, the products are delivered and title and risk of loss has passed to customers, the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales agreements typically contain customary product warranties but do not contain any post-shipment obligations nor any return or credit provisions.

A majority of our contracts provide that products are shipped under free on board, or FOB, terms or cost, insurance and freight, or CIF, terms or delivered duty unpaid, or DDU terms. Under FOB, we fulfill our obligation when the goods have passed over the ship’s rail at the named port of shipment. The customer bears all costs and risks of loss of or damage to the goods from that point. Under CIF, we must pay the costs, insurance and freight necessary to bring the goods to the named port of destination, and bear the risk of loss of or damage to the goods during transit. Under DDU, we are responsible for making a safe delivery of goods to a named destination, paying all transportation expenses but not the duty. We bear the risks and costs associated with supplying the good to the delivery location. We recognize revenue when the title of goods and risk of loss or damage is transferred to the customers based on the terms of the sales contracts, and if other recognition criteria are met.

Solar Power Projectsproject assets

 

We recognize revenue from the sale of project assets in accordance with ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales. For these transactions, we have determined that the project assets, which represent the costs of constructing solar power projects, represent “integral” equipment and as such, the entire transaction is in substance the sale of real estate and subject to the revenue recognition guidance under ASC 360-20 Real Estate. Under the provisions of real estate accounting, we recognize revenue under full accrual method when all of the following requirements are met: (a) the sales are consummated; (b) the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate its commitment to pay; (c) the receivable is not subject to any future subordination; and (d) we have transferred the usual risk and rewards of ownership to the buyer. Specifically, we consider the following factors in determining whether the sales have been consummated: (a) the parties are bound by the terms of a contract; (b) all consideration has been exchanged; (c) permanent financing for which the seller is responsible has been arranged; and (d) all conditions precedent to closing have been performed, and we do not have any substantial continuing involvement with the project.

 

For sales agreements that have energy generation performance guarantees withincovering a certain timeframe, if there is an underperformance event, we may incur liquidated damages as a percentage of the EPC contract price. The revenueRevenue recognized is reduced by the maximum amount of the payable liquidated damage, which amount is deferred until the end of the guarantee period.

 

For sales agreements that have conditional repurchase clauses if certain events occur, such as not achieving specified guaranteed performance level within a certain timeframe, we will defer and will not recognize revenue on such sales agreements until the conditional repurchase clauses are of no further force or effect and all other necessary revenue recognition criteria have been met.

 

b) Sale of project asset rights

We also sell the project rights to customers through the disposal of project companies holding the relevant permits. For these transactions, the project companies could either own the land or lease the land under the lease term that could cover the entire power plant’s life. For the transactions with the land owned, we account the entire transaction under the revenue recognition guidance of ASC 360-20 Real Estate. Under the provisions of real estate accounting, we recognize revenue under full accrual method when all of the requirements mentioned in the sale of project assets above are met. For the transactions with the land leased, we recognize revenue when the revenue is realized or realizable and earned in accordance with ASC 605-10-S99-1. In these transactions, we are also responsible for locating the electricity end subscribers for certain percentage of the entire contract consideration. A consideration reduction will occur if the located end subscribers dont reach to a defined threshold per the contract terms. The portion of the revenue is not recognized until the contingency has been removed, that is when the relevant subscription agreements are effective. Costs incurred during the course of obtaining permits are capitalized and recorded in project assets before the sale of project rights is completed.

c) Jointly arrangements of power projects for sale

We also enter into cooperation arrangement to jointly construct power projects for sale. In the arrangement, our performance obligations generally including design, engineering, procurement of all PV modules, materials needed for the projects and locating end subscriptions, while the counterparty is the primary obligor for constructing the power projects under the joint cooperation agreement, holds the ownership of the land and power projects and sell the power projects. The counterparty and we each generally receive 50% of the total selling price of the power projects. We recognize revenue, representing 50% of the selling price of the power projects, from this arrangement when the revenue is realized or realizable and earned in accordance with ASC 605-10-S99-1, which is normally when the power projects are sold to the external buyers, when all of the following requirements are met: (a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (b) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (d) collectability is reasonably assured.

EPC Services

We provide engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) services under the EPC contracts to design and build the power plant on customer’s site per customer’s request.

72

We generally recognize revenue for EPC services over time using a percentage-of completion method as our performance creates or enhances an energy generation asset controlled by the customer per ASC 605-35. In applying the percentage-of-completion method, we follow the cost-to-cost method and uses the actual costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs (including module costs) in order to determine the progress towards completion and calculate the corresponding amount of revenue and profit to recognize. Costs incurred include direct materials, solar modules, labor, subcontractor costs, and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor and supplies. When contracts specify that title to direct materials and solar modules transfers to the customer before installation has been performed, we will not recognize revenue or the associated costs until those materials are installed and have met all other revenue recognition requirements.

The percentage-of-completion method of revenue recognition requires us to make estimates of net contract revenues and costs to complete our projects. In making such estimates, management judgments are required to evaluate significant assumptions including the amount of net contract revenues, the cost of materials and labor, subcontractor costs, the impact of potential variances in schedule completion, and the impact of any penalties, claims, change orders, or performance incentives.

If estimated total costs on any contract are greater than the net contract revenues, we recognize the entire estimated loss in the period the loss becomes known. The cumulative effect of the revisions to estimates related to net contract revenues and costs to complete contracts, including penalties, claims, change orders, performance incentives, anticipated losses, and others are recorded in the period in which the revisions to estimates are identified and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. The effect of the changes on future periods are recognized as if the revised estimates had been used since revenue was initially recognized under the contract. Such revisions could occur in any reporting period, and the effects may be material depending on the size of the contracts or the changes in estimates. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, no such revisions occur.

We bill the customer based on progress billing terms in the contract. Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled) represents revenue that has been recognized in advance of billing the customer, which is common for long-term construction contracts. We typically recognize revenue from contracts for the construction and sale of PV solar power systems over time using cost based input methods, which recognizes revenue and gross profit as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred compared to the total estimated costs of the contract. Accordingly, revenue could be recognized in advance of billing the customer, resulting in an amount recorded to “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” as disclosed in Note 4. Once we have an unconditional right to consideration under a construction contract, we typically bill the customer accordingly and reclassifies the “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” to “Accounts receivable from EPC services (billed).” Billing requirements vary by contract but are generally structured around the completion of certain construction milestones. Certain of the EPC contracts for PV solar power systems contain retainage provisions. Retainage represents contract costs for the portion of the contract price earned for work performed, but held for payment by the customer as a form of security until certain defined timeframe has been reached. We consider whether collectability of such retainage is reasonably assured in connection with our overall assessment of the collectability of amounts due or that will become due under the EPC contracts. Retainage included within “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” is expected to be billed and collected within the next 12 months. After we have satisfied the EPC contract requirements and have an unconditional right to consideration, the retainage is billed and reclassified to “Accounts receivable from EPC services (billed).” Refer to Note 4 for detail breakdown of the “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” and “Accounts receivable from EPC services (billed)” amounts.

For EPC services, we provide limited warranty for certain years for the modules, materials and construction part of the power plants. Although we subcontract the construction to third party developers and purchase the raw materials and modules from third party suppliers, we are the primary obligor for the limited warranties such as solar module product warranty for a period of five to ten years, warranties for defects in engineering design, installation, workmanship for a period of one to two years and records a liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. On another hand, we have a legally enforceable right to recover these warranties from the subcontractor and suppliers as these parties have contracted with us to assume these warranty obligations, and that we will also record receivables for expected reimbursement in amounts that we believe are probable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The EPC warranty expenses and expected recovery amounts related to warranties are recorded net in expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations on the basis that the amounts provided by the subcontractor and suppliers are a reimbursement of our costs. As of December 31, 2016 and 2017, the liabilities, receivables are not material. The related expenses for the three years ended Dec 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 are also not material.

73

Electricity revenue generation

We recognize electricity generation revenue for us operated power plant when persuasive evidence of a power purchase arrangement with the power grid we exists, electricity has been generated and been transmitted to the grid and the electricity generation records are reconciled with the grid companies, the price of electricity is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Note that we are entitled to the feed-in tariff(s) (FIT) that the government guaranteed and subsidized electricity sale price at which solar power projects can produce green energy. We recognize the FIT as part of the electricity generation revenue when the entitlement to receipt of such FIT is fulfilled.

Revenue from green certificates

We receive green energy certificates based on electricity generated from the power plants in a subsidiary. We sell these certificates to buyers who can then meet the mandatory government quota per year for green energy produced. We believe that these green certificates are government incentive and the sale of green energy certificates does not fall into derivative and lease accounting scope. We recognize revenue for the sale in accordance with ASC 605-10-S99-1 when persuasive evidence of a green certificate purchase arrangement with the buyer exists, green certificates have been delivered to the buyer, the price of total green certificates sold is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, revenue from green certificates were $ 1,534,297, $ 1,708,163 and $ 4,184,724, respectively.

Value added tax (“VAT”)

Value added tax (“VAT”) at a differentiated rates on invoice amount is collected on behalf of tax authorities in respect of the different types of revenues and is not recorded as revenue. VAT paid for purchases, net of VAT collected from customers, is recorded as an asset.

Deferred Project Revenueproject revenue

 

Deferred project revenue was $nil$32,242,995 and $32.4 million as of$20,791,918 at December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, respectively, and mainly represented customer payments received or customer billings made under the terms of solar power project related sales contracts for which all revenue recognition criteria for real estate transactions have not yet been met. The associated solar power project related costs are included as deferred project costs. We classify such amounts as current or noncurrent depending on when all revenue recognition criteria are expected to be met, consistent with the classification of the associated deferred project costs.


Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Deferred Income Taxes

 

We evaluate our long-lived assetsDeferred income taxes are recognized for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate thattemporary differences between the carrying amounttax basis of an asset may not be recoverable or that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated. We assess recoverability of the long-lived assets by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and liabilities and their eventual disposition. We recognize an impairment lossreported amounts in the event the carrying amount exceeds the estimatedfinancial statements, net operating loss carry forwards and credits by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets, measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the assets and the fair value of the impaired assets.

The impairment charge was recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeded the fair value of the idled assets. The fair value of the idled assets was estimated based on two market based analyses, including an assessment that general machinery could be sold in the market, based on second-hand market quotations and that specialized machines and associated facilities have scrap value associated with their metal components, net of dismantling cost, freights, and relevant taxes.

At the end of September 2013, we concluded that we failed to achieve the cost reduction objectives of our ongoing technology improvement project, and as such we determined that it was no longer feasible to operate the Phase I facility without continuing to incur losses. We recognized the impairment charge of $202.8 million, including $194.7 million associated with the long-lived assets of the Phase I facility in our wafer segment, accordingly for the year ended December 31, 2013. Production at the Phase I facility was permanently discontinued in October 2013. There was no impairment loss of long-lived assets during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2015.

Valuation ofyears. Deferred Tax Assets

We periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and reduce the carrying amount of these deferred tax assetsare reduced by a valuation allowance towhen, in the extent we believeopinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry forward periods, our experience with operating losses in the China solar power industry, tax planning strategies implemented and other tax planning alternatives. If our operating results are less than currently projected and there is no objectively verifiable evidence to support the realization of our deferred tax asset, additional valuation allowance may be required to further reduce our deferred tax asset. Based on the results of the analysis, we determined that it was more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets would not be realized before the expiration of the carryforward period. A valuation allowance of $126.6 million was established for the year ended December 31, 2015. We still believe that it is more likely than not that the remaining $16.2 million of deferred tax assets will be realized before the carryforward period expires.

Current income taxes are provided for in accordance with the laws of the relevant taxing authorities. We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.

Allowance for Doubtful Receivables, Advances to Suppliers Before 2016, the component of the deferred tax assets and Advances for Purchases of Property, Plantliabilities were individually classified as current and Equipment

We maintain allowances for doubtful receivables, advances to suppliers and advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment primarilynon-current based on the age of receivables or advances and factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers or suppliers. We perform ongoing credit evaluationscharacteristics of the suppliers’ financial conditions. We generally do not require collateral or other security against such suppliers; however, we maintain a reserve for potential credit losses. If there is a deterioration of a major customer or supplier’s creditworthiness or actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, we may need to maintain additional allowances. Allowances for doubtful receivables are comprised of allowances for accounts receivable and allowances for other receivables.


In order to secure a stable supply of silicon materials and construction materials, we make advance payments to suppliers for raw material supplies and advances for purchases of long-lived assets which are offset against future deliveries. Advances to suppliers for purchases expected within twelve months as of each balance sheet date are recorded as advances to suppliers in currentunderlying assets and those associated with purchasesliabilities, or the expected over longer periodstiming of time. Future balances are recorded in non-current advancetheir use when they did not relate to suppliers. As of December 31, 2013, 2014a specific asset or liability. From 2016, we adopted ASU2015-17 prospectively, and 2015, advances to suppliers in current assets were $14.2 million, $27.5 million and $18.5 million, respectively, and non-current advance to suppliers for silicon raw material supplies were $5.6 million, nil and nil, respectively. Advances for property, plant and equipment are recorded in non-current assets and were $2.2 million, $1.8 million and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2013, 20142016 and 2015, respectively. We do not require collateral or other security against our advances to suppliers. We perform ongoing credit evaluations on2017, the components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are all classified as non-current in a classified statement of financial condition of our suppliers as our claims for such prepayments are unsecured, which expose us to the suppliers’ credit risk. As of December 31, 2015, $4.4 million of allowance was provided against the advances to suppliers.position.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, we made provisions for doubtful receivables, advances to suppliers and advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment in the aggregate amount of $3.7 million, $5.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

74

 

Warranty Expenses

Our solar modules are typically sold with 25 year warranties against specified declines in the initial minimum power generation capacity at the time of delivery. We also provide warranties for solar modules against defects in materialsProject assets and workmanship for a period of five or ten years from the date of sale. Warranty cost is accrued at the point the related module revenue is recognized. Due to our limited solar module manufacturing history, we do not have a significant history of warranty claims. Cost of warranties is estimated based on an assessment of our and competitors’ accrual history, industry-standard testing, estimates of failure rates from quality review and other assumptions that are considered to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual warrantydeferred project costs are accumulated and charged against accrued warranty liability. To the extent that actual warranty cost differs from the estimates, we will prospectively revise the accrual rate. As such estimates are subjective, we will continue to analyze our claim history and the performance of our products and compare against our competitors, industry data for warranty claims, and other assumptions, such as academic research, to determine whether our accrual is adequate. We have adopted a warranty accrual rate of 1.0% of PV module revenues, based on our assessment of industry norms which also represents our best estimate to date. Should we begin to experience warranty claims differing from our accrual rate, we would prospectively revise the warranty accrual rate. We revised downward the estimated cost to satisfy our outstanding product warranty by approximately $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, attributable primarily to a decrease in the average selling prices of solar modules, a primary input into the estimated costs of our warranty policy. From the first quarter of 2014, we reclassified warranty expenses from cost of revenues to selling expenses, to better reflect our global OEM business operations and align our accounting policy to industry peers. The reclassifications have been adopted retrospectively and the comparative consolidated income statement amounts for the years ended December 31, 2010 to 2013 have been adjusted accordingly. We adjusted downward the estimated warranty expenses by $3.2 million to reflect our outstanding product warranty for the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to the decrease in average selling price of our solar modules, which is a primary factor for determining the estimated warranty expenses.

For utility-scale solar power projects built by us, we provide performance warranty which we may need to perform an energy generation performance test during the first and second year of the solar power plant’s operation. Such a test is designed to demonstrate that the actual energy generation for the first and second year meets or exceeds the modeled energy expectation, after certain adjustments and exclusions. If there is an underperformance event, determined at the end of the first and second year after substantial completion, we may incur liquidated damages as a percentage of the EPC contract price.

Project Assets and Deferred Project Costs

 

In 2012, we began entering into arrangements to develop commercial solar power systems, or projects ("project assets,assets") for sale upon their completion. Project assets consist primarily of costs relating to solar power projects in various stages of development that are capitalized prior to entering into a definitive sales agreement for the solar power project. These costs include certain acquisition costs, land costs and costs for developing and constructing a solar power system.project. Development costs can include legal, consulting, permitting, and other similar costs. Construction costs can include execution of field construction, installation of solar equipment, and solar modules and related equipment. Interest costs incurred on debt during the construction phase are also capitalized within project assets. We dodoes not depreciate the project assets, when they are considered held for sale. Any revenue generated from a solar power systemproject connected to the grid would be considered incidental revenue and accounted for as a reduction of the capitalized project costs for development. In addition, we present all expenditures related to the development and construction of project assets as a component of cash flows from operating activities.


During the development phase, these project assets are accounted for in accordance with the recognition, initial measurement and subsequent measurement subtopics of ASC 970- 360, as they are considered in substance real estate.

While the solar power projects are in the development phase, they are generally classified as non-current assets, unless it is anticipated that construction will be completed and sale will occur within one year.

 

Project assets are classifiedWe capitalize the costs related to solar power projects in various stages of development prior to entering into a definitive sales agreement for the solar power project and classifies these costs as currentproject assets on the consolidated balance sheets when the criteria in ASC 360-10-45-9 are met. If not met, we will reclassify them to property, plant and equipment, unless the delay in the period required to complete the sale is caused by events or circumstances beyond our control. In 2014, we reclassified two project assets in Romania to property, plant and equipment with the carrying value of $27,127,591.

 

Deferred project costs representrepresents costs that are capitalized as project assets for arrangements that are accounted for as real estate transactions after we have entered into a definitive sales arrangement, but before the sale is completed or before all criteria to recognize the sale as revenue is met. We classify deferred project costs as noncurrent if all revenue recognition criteria are not expected within the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2015, we entered into a sale transaction for one project asset, which includes contractual provisions which may require us to repurchase the project asset under certain circumstances.circumstances, and the revenue recognition criteria is not met until the issuance of the final acceptance certificate (“FAC”) by the customer. The repurchase provisions expireexpired on June 30, 2017. In connection with this transaction,2017 and the FAC was received in March 2018. Therefore, we have classified the project asset as non-current deferred project costs as of December 31, 2016 and the cash received in connection with the sales pricecurrent deferred project cost as deferred revenue of $20.9 million and $25.4 million, respectively.December 31, 2017.

 

We review project assets and deferred project costs for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We consider a project commercially viable or recoverable if it is anticipated to be sold for a profit once it is either fully developed or fully constructed. We consider a partially developed or partially constructed project commercially viable or recoverable if the anticipated selling price is higher than the carrying value of the related project assets.assets and the estimated costs to complete. We examine a number of factors to determine if the project will be recoverable, the most notable of which include whether there are any changes in environmental, ecological, permitting, market pricing or regulatory conditions that impact the project. Such changes could cause the costs of the project to increase or the selling price of the project to decrease. If a project is not considered recoverable, we impair the respective project assets and adjustadjusts the carrying value to the estimated recoverable amount, with the resulting impairment recorded within operations. We did not recognize any impairment losses on project assets for the years ended December 31, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

Segment Operations

 

In 20132015, 2016 and 2014,prior to September 2017, we operated in twothree principal reportable business segments, namely wafer sales segment, and cell and module sales segment. In 2015, we began to report revenue from sales ofsegment and solar power projects segment. In September 2017, we completed a disposition of our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and generation of electricitysolar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business. As a separate segment.result, we have transformed into a solar project developer and operator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the world. We currently operate our businessseparate the solar power project segment into three reportable segments, including solar power project development, EPC services and electricity revenue generation. Ancillary revenues and expenses and other unallocated costs and expenses are recorded in three principal reportable business segments:

·wafer sales segment, which involves the manufacture and sales of monocrystalline and multicrystalline solar wafers and processing services;

·cell and module sales segment, which involves the manufacture and sales of solar cells and modules; and

·solar power projects segment, which involves sales of solar power projects, and electricity generation revenue of certain project assets we own and operate which were reported under our other business segment during previous years.

The three segments are evaluated regularly by our chief executive officer to decide how to allocate resources and to assess performance. We do not allocate operating expenses by segment.other.

 

We began selling solar modules in June 2009 after our acquisition of ReneSola Jiangsu. ReneSola Jiangsu began its cell manufacturing in October 2008 and module manufacturing in November 2005. As of December 31, 2015, ReneSola Jiangsu had an annual cell manufacturing capacity of 240 MW and an annual module manufacturing capacity of 1,200 MW. Although sales from our wafer segment have been our dominant business since the end of 2011, we have shifted our focus to the module segment and in 2014 transformed our business so that we now primarily produce modules. In addition, starting from 2015, in line with our expansion into downstream solar power projects businesses, we began to recognize revenue from sales of solar power projects. See “—Results of Operations” for a discussion of period-to-period comparisons between the segments.

75

 

Results of Operations

In September 2017, we completed a disposition of our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business.

 

The following table sets forth a summary, for the periods indicated, of our consolidated results of operations with each item expressed as a percentage of our total net revenues, except for the percentages of gross margin which represent the gross margin of each segment or our overall gross margin, as applicable.expressed.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
Continuing operations            
             
Net Revenue :            
Solar power project development $110,737,934  $77,372,737  $64,837,042 
Electricity revenue generation  5,551,742   3,131,997   12,247,320 
EPC services  -   -   25,853,288 
Other  41,260   -   36,349 
Total net revenue  116,330,936   80,504,734   102,973,999 
Cost of revenue  (93,295,780)  (73,271,853)  (88,842,244)
Gross profit  23,035,156   7,232,881   14,131,755 
             
Operating (expenses)/income:            
Sales and marketing  (233,630)  (549,299)  (1,710,024)
General and administrative  (7,393,843)  (6,828,817)  (6,179,274)
Other operating income  910,743   2,493,898   313,153 
Total operating expenses  (6,716,730)  (4,884,218)  (7,576,145)
             
Income from operations  16,318,426   2,348,663   6,555,610 
Non-operating income/(expenses):            
             
Interest income  38,850   3,552   51,403 
Interest expense  (1,999,454)  (1,842,227)  (3,936,302)
Foreign exchange (losses)/gains  (1,201,578)  (1,072,836)  894,704 
Losses on derivatives, net  (7,971,934)  (134)  - 
Gains on repurchase of convertible notes  13,693,269   212,056   - 
Fair value change of warrant liability  1,312,500   577,500   - 
Other loss  -   -   (43,516)
Total non-operating income/(expenses)  3,871,653   (2,122,089)  (3,033,711)
             
Income before income tax  20,190,079   226,574   3,521,899 
Income tax (expense)/benefit  23,191   (132,092)  (322,068)
             
Income from continuing operations, net of tax  20,213,270   94,482   3,199,831 
Discontinued operations            
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations before income taxes  -   -   106,292,213 
Loss from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes  (24,591,585)  (32,631,226)  (79,782,830)
Income tax benefit/(expense)  (696,807)  (2,161,507)  4,748,324 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax  (25,288,392)  (34,792,733)  31,257,707 
Net income (loss) $(5,075,122) $(34,698,251) $34,457,538 
             
Net income (loss) attributed to ReneSola Ltd $(5,075,122) $(34,698,251) $34,457,538 
             
Income per share from continuing operations            
Basic $0.10  $-  $0.01 
Diluted $0.10  $-  $0.01 
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations            
Basic $(0.12) $(0.17) $0.13 
Diluted $(0.12) $(0.17) $0.13 
             
Weighted average number of shares used in computing income (loss) per share            
Basic  204,085,041   202,229,767   246,899,286 
Diluted  204,222,541   202,403,904   246,905,289 
             
Net income/(loss) $(5,075,122) $(34,698,251) $34,457,538 
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax of nil:            
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (19,503,275)  (10,343,509)  11,513,216 
             
Release of translation difference due to disposal of discontinued operation  -   -   (64,984,682)
             
Other comprehensive loss  (19,503,275)  (10,343,509)  (53,471,466)
             
Comprehensive loss  (24,578,397)  (45,041,760)  (19,013,928)
             
Comprehensive loss attributable to ReneSola Ltd $(24,578,397) $(45,041,760) $(19,013,928)

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2013   2014   2015 
  (in thousands, except percentages) 
Net revenues    
Solar wafers(1)(2) $366,161   24.1% $223,489   14.3% $225,633   17.6%
Solar modules(3)(4)  1,141,964   75.1   1,329,268   85.1   940,011   73.3 
Solar power projects(5)(6)  11,510   0.8   8,740   0.6   116,387   9.1 
Total  1,519,635   100.0   1,561,497   100.0   1,282,031   100.0 
Cost of revenues                        
Solar wafers(7)  (350,905)  (23.1)  (201,006)  (12.9)  (198,584)  (15.5)
Solar modules(8)  (1,051,981)  (69.2)  (1,146,392)  (73.4)  (802,295)  (62.6)
Solar power projects  (3,644)  (0.2)  (4,819)  (0.3)  (93,278)  (7.3)
Total  (1,406,530)  (92.6)  (1,352,214)  (86.6)  (1,094,157)  (85.3)
Gross profit and gross margin                        
Solar wafers  15,256   4.2   22,483   10.1   27,049   12.0 
Solar modules  89,983   7.9   182,876   13.8   137,716   14.7 
Solar power projects  7,866   68.3   3,924   44.9   23,109   19.9 
Total  113,105   7.4   209,283   13.4   187,874   14.7 
Operating (expenses) income:                        
Sales and marketing(5)  (75,595)  (4.9)  (93,067)  (6.0)  (72,295)  (5.6)
General and administrative  (55,633)  (3.7)  (67,294)  (4.3)  (59,290)  (4.6)
Research and development  (46,452)  (3.1)  (52,575)  (3.4)  (43,905)  (3.4)
Other operating (expenses) income  45,886   3.0   11,870   0.8   16,920   1.3 
Impairment of long-lived assets  (202,757)  (13.3)            
Total operating expenses  (334,551)  (22.0)  (201,066)  (12.9)  (158,570)  (12.4)
Income (loss) from operations  (221,446)  (14.6)  8,217   0.5   29,304   2.3 
Non-operating income (expenses):                        
Interest income  8,443   0.6   5,010   0.3   2,875   0.2 
Interest expense  (52,109)  (3.4)  (49,016)  (3.1)  (43,418)  (3.4)
Foreign exchange (losses) gains  (368)  (—)*  (27,009)  (1.7)  (2,137)  (0.2)
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net  634   *  6,058   0.4   (6,031)  (0.5)
Gains on repurchase of convertible notes        7,048   0.4   13,693   1.1 
                         


76

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands, except percentages) 
Fair value change of warrant liability  3,203   0.2   7,455   0.5   1,313   0.1 
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries        8,253   0.5       
Total non-operating (expenses)  (40,197)  (2.7)  (42,201)  (2.7)  (33,705)  (2.6)
Loss before income tax, non-controlling interests  (261,643)  (17.2)  (33,984)  (2.2)  (4,401)  (0.3)
Income tax benefit (expense)  2,723   0.2   350   *  (674)  (0.1)
Net loss  (258,920)  (17.0)  (33,634)  (2.2)  (5,075)  (0.4)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests  (4)  (—)*  (4)  *      
Net income (loss) attributable to holders of ordinary shares $(258,916)  (17.0)% $(33,630)  (2.2)% $(5,075)  (0.4)%

 

*Less than 0.1%.

(1)Includes $51.1 million, $41.0 million and $61.9 million from sales of other materials in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(2)Includes approximately $2.9 million, $2.9 million and $0.05 million of net revenues in our solar wafer segment from products sold to related parties in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Net revenues in our solar wafer segment from products sold to related parties accounted for 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.003% of our total net revenues in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(3)Includes approximately $23.9 million, $12.4 million and $8.3 million from sales of solar cells in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, the net revenues from solar modules also included approximately $1.2 million, $7.8 million and $11.5 million, respectively, from service revenue from tolling arrangements with respect to solar modules.

(4)Includes approximately $0.3 million, nil and nil of net revenues in our solar module segment from products sold to related parties in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Net revenues in our solar module segment from products sold to related parties accounted for less than 0.1%, nil % and nil% of our total net revenues in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(5)Includes nil, nil and $110.7 million from sales of solar power projects in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Net revenues from sales of solar power projects accounted for nil, nil and 8.6% of our total net revenues in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(6)Includes $11.5 million, $8.7 million and $5.6 million from sales of electricity generated by our power systems held for use in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Net revenues from sales of electricity generated by our power systems held for use accounted for 0.7%, 0.6% and 0.4% of our total net revenues in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(7)Includes approximately $3.3 million, $2.7 million and $0.05 million of cost of revenues in our solar wafer segment from products sold to related parties in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The cost of revenues of our solar wafer segment from products sold to related parties accounted for 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.003% of the total net revenues in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(8)Includes approximately $0.2 million, nil and $nil of cost of revenues in our solar module segment from products sold to related parties in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The cost of revenues of our solar module segment from products sold to related parties accounted for less than 0.1%, nil% and nil% of the total net revenues in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

Year Ended December 31, 20152017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20142016

 

Net Revenues.Revenues. Our net revenues decreased from $1,561.5continuing operations increased from $80.5 million in 20142016 to $1,282.0$103.0 million in 20152017 primarily due to decreases(i) the increase of the revenue from our EPC services of $25.9 million, which was our new business in 2017 and (ii) the increase of the revenue from our module shipmentselectricity generation business and average module selling price,green certificates sale of $9.1 million, which resulted from the significant expansion of our IPP business in China and the increased demand in the green certificate market in 2017, partially offset by ourthe decrease of the revenue from sales of solar power projects in 2015.


Net revenues were $225.6 million for our wafer sales segment, $940.0 million for our modules sales segment and $116.4 million for our solar power project segment in 2015, compared to $223.5 million for our wafer sales segment, $1,329.3 million for our modules sales segment and $8.8 million for the solar power project segment in 2014. The increase in net revenues for wafer segment was primarily due to an increase in wafer shipments from 846.1 MW in 2014 to 1,088.6 MW in 2015, partially offset by a decrease in average wafer selling price from $0.216 per watt in 2014 to $0.181 per watt in 2015.The decrease in net revenues for module sales was primarily due to a decrease in the average module selling price from $0.664 per watt in 2014 to $0.576 per watt in 2015, as well as a decrease in module shipments from 1,970 MW in 2014 to 1,597 MW in 2015. Such decreases were primarily due to decreased volume of sales orders and the use of some in-house manufactured modules in our solar power projects. We began to generate revenue from sales of solar power projects in 2015. and recorded net revenue of $110.7 million from the sales of our solar power projects in 2015.of $12.5 million.

 

Cost of Revenues. Our cost of revenues decreasedfor continuing operations increased from $1,352.2$73.3 million in 20142016 to $1,094.2$88.8 million in 2015. Specifically, cost2017, which is aligned with the increase of revenues for our wafer sales segment decreased from $201.0 million in 2014 to $198.6 million in 2015, cost of revenues for our module sales segment decreased from $1,146.4 million in 2014 to $802.3 million in 2015 and cost of revenues for our solar power project segment increased from $4.8 million in 2014 to $93.3 million in 2015. The decrease in wafer segment was primarily due to the lower processing cost. The decrease in module segment was primarily due to the decreased module shipment volume and the lower processing cost. The increase in solar power project segment was primarily due to our sales of solar power projects since 2015.revenue.

 

Gross Profit. Gross profit from continuing operations for 20152017 was $187.9$14.1 million, compared to a gross profit of $209.3$7.2 million in 2014.2016. Gross margin for 20152017 was 14.7%13.7%, compared to a gross margin of 13.4%9.0% in 2014.2016. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to athe increase of the gross margin of the electricity revenue, which mainly resulted from the increase of the green certificate revenue from US$1.7 million in 2016 to US$4.2 million in 2017, effect of the margin of 13.6% for our new EPC service in 2017, partially offset by the decrease in our wafer processing cost and the higher gross margin associated withof our solar power project business.projects.

Gross profit from our wafer sales segment for 2015 was $27.0 million, compared to $22.5 million in 2014. Gross margin from our wafer sales segment for 2015 was 12.0%, compared to 10.1% in 2014. Gross profit from our module sales segment decreased from $182.9 million in 2014 to $137.7 million in 2015. Gross margin from our module sales segment for 2015 was 14.7%, compared to 13.8% in 2014. Gross profit from our solar power project segment was $23.1 million in 2015, compared to $3.9 million in 2014. Gross margin from our solar power project segment for 2015 was 19.9%, compared to 44.9% for 2014.

Sales and Marketing Expenses.Sales and marketing expenses decreasedfor continuing operations increased from $93.1$0.5 million in 20142016 to $72.3$1.7 million in 2015, and sales and marketing expenses as a percentage2017 which is aligned with the growth of net revenues decreased from 6.0% in 2014 to 5.6% in 2015, primarily due to a decrease in shipment expenses in line with our decreased module shipments, as well as a decrease in warranty expenses.revenue.

 

General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses for continuing operations decreased from $67.3$6.8 million in 20142016 to $59.3$6.2 million in 2015,2017, primarily due to our effective expense control measures. Our generalefforts to reduce consulting and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues slightly increased from 4.3% in 2014 to 4.6% in 2015.professional service fees.

 

Research and Development Expenses.Research and development expenses decreased from $52.6 million in 2014 to $43.9 million in 2015. Our research and development expenses as a percentage of net revenues remained stable at 3.4% in 2014 and 2015.

Other Operating Income.Expenses. We had other operating incomeexpenses for continuing operations of $16.9$ 2.5 million for 2015, compared to an operating income $11.92016 and $0.3 million for 2014.2017. Our other operating income consisted primarily of gains or losses on disposal of fixed assetsproperty, plant and land use rights, subsidies received fromequipment. The decrease of other operating income for continuing operations in 2017 was primarily due to the government, and gain from settlementdisposal gains of certain payables.the solar power project in Bulgaria in 2016, which was classified as PPE before the disposal. We didn’t recognize similar disposal gains in 2017.

 

Interest Income and Expenses.Our interest income decreasedfor continuing operations increased from $5.0$0.004 million in 20142016 to $2.9$0.05 million in 2015.2017. Our interest expense decreasedexpenses increased from $49.0$1.8 million in 20142016 to $43.4$3.9 million in 2015,2017, which was mainly due to the decreaseincreased financing lease payable for the solar power project in our total outstanding convertible senior bonds. As a result, we had an interest expense, net, of $40.5 million in 2015, compared to $44.0 million in 2014.China.

77

 

Foreign Exchange Gains or Losses.(Losses). Our We had a foreign exchange lossgain for 2015 was $2.1continuing operations of $0.9 million in 2017, compared to a foreign exchange loss of $27.0$1.1 million for 2014.in 2016. The foreign exchange lossgain in 20152017 was primarily due to the increased unrealized exchange gain of bank borrowings in Won which has a depreciation in 2017.

Income Tax Benefit (Expenses). Our income tax expense for continuing operations for 2017 was $0.3 million, compared to an income tax expense of Renminbi.$0.1 million in 2016. The foreign exchange lossincrease in 20142017 was mainly resulted from the increase in income before tax.

Net Income (Loss).As a result of the foregoing, we had a net gain from continuing operations of $3.2 million in 2017, compared to a net gain of $0.09 million in 2016.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Net Revenues. Our net revenues from continuing operations decreased from $116.3 million in 2015 to $80.5 million in 2016, primarily due to (i) the decrease of the revenue from our solar power projects of $33.4million and (ii) the decrease of the revenue from electricity generation and green certificates sale of $2.4 million, which resulted from a shrinking market of green certificates in 2016.

Cost of Revenues. Our cost of revenues for continuing operations decreased from $93.3 million in 2015 to $73.3 million in 2016, which is aligned with the decrease of our revenue..

Gross Profit. Gross profit from continuing operations for 2016 was $7.2 million, compared to a gross profit of $23.0 million in 2015. Gross margin for 2016 was 9.0%, compared to a gross margin of 19.8% in 2015. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to the depreciationdecrease of the Eurogross margin of solar power project we sold, which is due to the increased market price of development costs.

Sales and Japanese yen againstMarketing Expenses.Sales and marketing expenses for continuing operations increased from $0.2 million in 2015 to $0.5 million in 2016 primarily due to the U.S. dollar.increased commission fee we paid for the sale of green certificates.

 

76 

General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses for continuing operations decreased from $7.4 million in 2015 to $6.8 million in 2016, primarily due to our efforts to reduce consulting and professional service fees.

 

Gains (losses) on Derivatives, Net.Other Operating Income. We recordedhad other operating income for continuing operations of $ 0.9 million for 2015 and $2.5 million for 2016. Our other operating income consisted primarily of gains or losses on derivatives, net,disposal of $6.0property, plant and equipment. The increase of other operating income for continuing operations in 2016 was primarily due to the disposal gains of the solar power project in Bulgaria in 2016, which was classified as PPE before the disposal.

Interest Income and Expenses.Our interest income for continuing operations decreased from $0.04 million in 2015 to $0.004 million in 2016. Our interest expenses decreased from $2.0 million in 2015 to $1.8 million in 2017, which was mainly due to the decreased borrowings for the solar power project in Bulgaria, which was disposed in 2016 .

Foreign Exchange Gains (Losses). We had a foreign exchange loss for continuing operations of $1.2 million in 2015, compared to a gain on derivatives, net,foreign exchange loss of $6.1$1.1 million for 2014.in 2016.

 

Gain on Disposal of Subsidiaries. We did not dispose any subsidiaries during the year ended December 31, 2015. We recorded a gain on disposal of subsidiaries of $8.3 million for 2014 as a result of the disposal of ten of our subsidiaries which were primarily engaged in the operation of our domestic solar power projects in Western China.

Gains on Repurchase of Convertible Notes. We recorded gainsgains/losses on repurchase of convertible senior notes for continuing operations of $13.7 million and $0.2 million for 2015 compared to gains on repurchase of convertible senior notes of $7.0 million for 2014.and 2016, respectively.

 

Fair Value Change of Warrant Liability. We recognized a gain from a fair value change of warrant liability for continuing operations of $0.6 million for 2016, compared to a gain of $1.3 million for 2015 and $7.5 million for 2014.2015.

 

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). Our income tax expense for 2015 was $0.7 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $0.4 million for 2014. The income tax expense in 2015 was mainly resulted from the generation of taxable income by some of our PRC subsidiaries.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Holders of Ordinary Shares..As a result of the foregoing, we had a net loss attributable to holdersgain from continuing operations of ordinary shares of $5.1$0.09 million in 2015,2016, compared to a net lossgain of $33.6$20.2 million in 2014.2015.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Net Revenues. Our net revenues increased from $1,519.6 million in 2013 to $1,561.5 million in 2014 primarily due to an increase in our module shipments and an increase in our average selling prices as a result of general market recovery.

Net revenues were $223.5 million for our wafer sales segment, $1,329.3 million for our modules sales segment and $8.7 million for our solar power projects segment in 2014, compared to $366.2 million for our wafer sales segment, $1,142.0 million for our modules sales segment and $11.5 million for our solar power projects segment in 2013. The net revenue for wafers decreased primarily because we used more of our self-produced wafers for our own module manufacturing. The increase in net revenue for module sales was primarily due to an increase in the average module sale price from $0.646 per watt in 2013 to $0.664 per watt in 2014, as well as an increase in module shipments from 1,729 MW in 2013 to 1,970 MW in 2014.

Cost of Revenues. Our cost of revenues decreased from $1,406.5 million in 2013 to $1,352.2 million in 2014. Specifically, cost of revenues for our wafer sales segment decreased from $350.9 million in 2013 to $201.0 million in 2014, cost of revenues for our module sales segment increased from $1,052.0 million in 2013 to $1,146.4 million in 2014, and cost of revenues for our solar power projects segment increased from $3.6 million in 2013 to $4.8 million in 2014. The decrease in the wafer segment was primarily due to a decreased shipment of wafers. The increase in the module segment was due to increased shipments.

Gross Profit (Loss). Gross profit for 2014 was $209.3 million, compared to a gross profit of $113.1 million in 2013. Gross margin for 2014 was 13.4%, compared to a gross margin of 7.4% in 2013. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in our module shipments and a general recovery of the industry.

Gross profit from our wafer sales segment for 2014 was $22.5 million, compared to a gross profit of $15.3 million in 2013. Gross margin from our wafer sales segment for 2014 was 10.1%, compared to 4.2% in 2013. Gross profit from our module sales segment increased from $97.8 million in 2013 to $186.8 million in 2014. Gross margin from our module sales segment for 2014 was 14.0%, compared to 8.5% in 2013.

Sales and Marketing Expenses.Sales and marketing expenses increased from $75.6 million in 2013 to $93.1 million in 2014 primarily due to our international business development. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased from 4.9% in 2013 to 6.0% in 2014 due to our increased efforts in exploring international development opportunities.

77 

78

 

 

GeneralDisposition of Manufacturing Businesses and Administrative Expenses.the LED Distribution BusinessGeneral

In September 2017, we completed a non-cash restructuring following which, among other things, substantially all of the assets and administrative expenses increased from $55.6 million in 2013liabilities related to $67.3 million in 2014. Our generalour manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and administrative expensessolar module manufacturing, as a percentagewell as the LED distribution business were transferred into ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Upon the closing of net revenues increased from 3.7% in 2013this restructuring, all the issued shares of ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd were transferred to 4.3% in 2014 asour chairman and chief executive officer.

As a result of the increaseour business restructuring in September 2017, bank borrowings in an aggregate amount in excess of international offices to explore international development opportunities.

Research and Development Expenses.Research and development expenses increased from $46.5 million in 2013 to $52.6 million in 2014. Our research and development expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased from 3.1% in 2013 to 3.4% in 2014.

Other Operating Income. We had other operating income of $11.9 million for 2014, compared to an operating income of $45.9 million for 2013. Our other operating income consisted primarily of government grants.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets. We recognized impairment of long-lived assets of nil as of December 31, 2014, compared to $202.8 million as of December 31, 2013.

Interest Income and Expenses.Our interest income decreased from $8.4 million in 2013 to $5.0 million in 2014. Our interest expense decreased from $52.1 million in 2013 to $49.0 million in 2014, which was mainly due to a decrease in total debt outstanding. As a result, we had an interest expense, net, of $44.0 million in 2014, compared to $43.7 million in 2013.

Foreign Exchange Gains or Losses. Our foreign exchange losses for 2014 were $27.0 million, compared to a foreign exchange loss of $0.4 million for 2013. The change was primarily dueRMB3 billion ($461 million) related to the depreciationtransferred businesses, or the Bank Borrowings, will no longer be consolidated on our balance sheet as all have been assumed by the buyer, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. agreed to cancel approximately $217.4 million of accounts and other payable owed by us and we issued 180 million of our shares of no par value per share to ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Mr. Li, our chairman and chief executive officer, and his spouse have provided personal guarantee for a majority of the euro and Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar.Bank Borrowings.

Gains (losses) on Derivatives, Net. We recorded a gain on derivatives, net, of $6.1 million for 2014, compared to a gain on derivatives, net, of $0.6 million for 2013.

Gain on Disposal of Subsidiaries. We recorded a gain on disposal of subsidiaries of $8.3 million for 2014 as a result of the disposal of ten of our subsidiaries which were primarily engaged in the operation of our domestic solar power projects in Western China. We recorded nil for 2013.

Gains on Repurchase of Convertible Notes. We recorded gains on repurchase of convertible senior notes of $7.0 million for 2014, compared to nil for 2013.

Fair Value Change of Warrant Liability.We recognized a gain from a fair value change of warrant liability of $7.5$106.3 million for 2014. We recognized a gain from a fair value change of warrant liability of $3.2 million for 2013.

Income Tax Benefit. Our income tax benefit for 2014 was $0.4 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $2.7 million for 2013. The increase in our tax benefit was due to different tax rates of tax jurisdictions and additional valuation allowances provided in 2014.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Holders of Ordinary Shares.As a resultbecause of the foregoing, we had a net loss attributable to holders of ordinary shares of $33.6 million in 2014, compared to a net loss of $258.9 million in 2013.disposition.

 

B.Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

In September 2017, we completed a non-cash restructuring following which, among other things, substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business were transferred into ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Upon the closing of this restructuring, all the issued shares of ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd were transferred to our chairman and chief executive officer. As a result, bank borrowings in excess of RMB3 billion ($461 million) related to the transferred businesses will no longer be consolidated on our balance sheet as all have been assumed by the buyer, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. agreed to cancel approximately $217.4 million of accounts and other payable owed by us and we issued 180 million ordinary shares to ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. As of December 31, 2015, although2017, our debt-to-asset ratio, which is total liabilities divided by total assets, was improved and decreased to 73.0% from 93.9% as of December 31, 2016.

As of December 31, 2017, we had negativepositive working capital and experienced a net lossincome from operations for the year, which may raise substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern, weyear. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operating activities, including project assets, and continued support from financial institutions, located in the PRC,fund investors and financing lease companies, in the form of renewed and additional short-term loan facilitiesor long-term financings (including trade financing),development loans, construction loans and project financings) and equity contribution, will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs that will arise in 20162018 and beyond.will be sufficient for the next 12 months from filing of this annual report. We intend to continue to carefully execute our operating plans and manage credit and market risk. However, if our financial results or operating plans change from our current assumptions, our liquidity could be negatively impacted.


The following financial conditions in 20152017 have impacted and are expected to continue to impact our liquidity. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred a net loss of approximately $5.1 million. As of December 31, 2015, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $466.1 million. Significant components of our working capital as of December 31, 2015, are2017, were as follows:

 

·Our total current assets were $637.8$170.1 million, including cash and cash equivalents of $38.0$13.4 million.

 

·We havehad current project assets of $20.2$76.6 million of late-stagein our late stage projects under development in the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, but have not yet sold any of these assets as of the date of this annual report.development. Although we believe that we will be able to sell such project assets at a profit, if we are unable to sell these project assets at reasonable prices in the near term, our liquidity may be negatively impacted.

 

·The amount of our total accounts and notes receivables increased from $125.7 million as of December 31, 2014 to $161.2 million as of December 31, 2015, primarily due to the increase in our notes receivables, which mainly related to the sales we made to a domestic customer who paid us with notes in the fourth quarter of 2015. The inability to collect on the existing accounts receivable may negatively impact our liquidity.

·Our advances to suppliers, current portion, which are unsecured, was $18.5$0.4 million as of December 31, 2015.

·The balance of finished goods inventory decreased from $226.4 million as of December 31, 2014 to $121.7 million as of December 31, 2015, primarily due to our scale-back of OEM arrangements and a decrease in our module sales volume. The inability to sell the finished goods at reasonable prices may negatively impact our liquidity.2017.

 

·Our current liabilities as of December 31, 20152017 included short-term bank borrowings of $667.7$6.6 million, all of which will be due within one year, and the current portion of long-term bank borrowings amounting to $1.1 million, which are not expected to be renewed.year.

While we expect to steadily increase our solar wafer manufacturing capacity in 2016, we plan to maintain our existing polysilicon, cell and module manufacturing capacities in 2016. We do not currently plan to build new facilities, but plan to incur total capital expenditures of up to $14.0 million to maintain or enhance our existing manufacturing facilities during 2016 and 2017.

 

Cash generated from operations and short-termexternal financing isand related party credit are our primary sourcesources of operating liquidity, and we believe that cash flows from operations combined with our existing cash and cash equivalents, and facilities currently available, and those expected to be renewed will be sufficient to satisfy our obligations when they become due. The following plans and actions are being taken to effectively manage our liquidity:

 

·79As of the date of this annual report, we performed a review of our cash flow forecast for the following twelve months. We believe that our operating cash flow in the forecasted period will be positive. We believe the forecast is based on reasonable assumptions, including: (i) the cost to produce modules and wafers is estimated to be marginally lower for the forecasted period, as a result of continuous cost control effectiveness, and (ii) we expect the solar power project business to generate positive cash inflow in the forecasted period.

 

·While there can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance our short-term bank borrowings as they become due, historically, we have rolled over or obtained replacement borrowings from existing creditors for most of our short-term bank loans upon the maturity date of the loans. As of March 31, 2016, we successfully rolled-over $87.7 million of short-term loans which were outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and we have assumed that we will continue to be able to do so for the foreseeable future.

 

·As of March 31, 2016, we had unused lines of credit of $110.4 million, of which $73.4 million was related to trade financing. Based on our historical experience, trade facility funding requests will be approved in the normal course, provided that we submit the required supporting documentation and the amount is within the credit limit granted.

·In March 2016, we received non-binding letters of commitment from four banks to support our financing in the amount of $426.0 million, of which $299.2 million was related to short term loans and $126.8 million was related to trade financing. However, the non-binding letters of commitment from banks do not have a stated term, and may be withdrawn by the banks at their discretion.

We have performed a review of our cash flow forecast for at least the twelve months following the issuance date of the 20-F. We expect the solar power project business to generate positive cash inflow in the forecasted period. In addition, we plan to continue our financing arrangements, such as renew and enter into new bank borrowings and financing lease and other arrangements and equity contribution to meet the working capital and expenditures requirements.

·In 2015, we sold three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 57.5 MW in the United Kingdom and three utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 1.8 MW in Japan. We also entered into sales agreements in connection with the sale of one utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 13.5 MW in the United Kingdom in 2015, which has been recorded as deferred revenue. In the first quarter of 2016, we completed construction of and connected three additional utility-scale solar power projects totaling approximately 20 MW, in the United Kingdom, which we have received letter of intent from potential purchasers. We also entered into a sales agreement in connection with the sale of two utility-scale solar power projects in Bulgaria totaling approximately 9.7 MW. This is estimated to generate positive cash inflow in the forecasted period.

·In the first quarter of 2016, we repurchased all of our remaining outstanding convertible notes with a carrying value of approximately $26.1 million using cash of $25.9 million.

 

Based on the above factors, we believe that adequate sources of liquidity will exist to fund our working capital and capital expenditureexpenditures requirements, and to meet our short term debt obligations, other liabilities and commitments as they become due.due for at least twelve months from the issuance date of the 20-F.

Borrowings

 

Short-term Borrowings

 

As of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015,2017, we had outstanding short-term borrowings of $673.1 million, $654.7 million and $668.8 million, respectively. These short-term borrowings will expire at various times throughout 2016. Our short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 were denominated primarily in the RMB and also in the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, Korean won and the Euro and bore a weighted average interest rate of 5.46%, 5.75% and 5.65%, respectively. As of March 31, 2016, we successfully rolled-over or obtained replacement borrowings from existing credit of $87.7 million short-term borrowings which were outstanding as of December 31, 2015. Some of our short-term borrowings are secured by our inventories, property, plant and equipment or land use rights and/or are guaranteed by our subsidiaries. We have other short-term borrowings guaranteed by Mr. Li, our chief executive officer and director, and his wife. Furthermore, according to certain loan agreements, we are obligated to maintain a certain minimum debt to asset ratio and our operating subsidiary, Sichuan ReneSola is not permitted to pay dividends in any year when any principal or interest on such loans is due.$6.6 million. We have maintained our level of short-term bank borrowings to meet our working capital requirements for capital expenditures or other corporate uses, and we have not experienced any financial difficulty with respect to any repayment of our borrowings.

 

Long-term Borrowings and Other Liabilities

As of December 31, 2015, $287.3 million of our outstanding short-term borrowings were trade financings which, consistent with all of our other short-term credit facilities, were historically rolled over. The majority of our short-term borrowings are provided by some of the largest banks in China. Historically, most of these banks extended the terms of their credit facilities when requested by us before their maturity dates. We believe our ability to extend our short-term credit facilities prior to their maturity remains strong in the current credit environment.

Long-term Borrowings

From time to time, we enter into long-term borrowing arrangements with various banks in China or overseas. As of December 31, 2013, 20142016 and 2015,2017, we had outstanding long-term borrowings with remaining terms of more than one year of $69.5 million, $43.5$28.8 million and $38.8$32.5 million, respectively. The long-term loan arrangementsfinancing set forth below are the arrangements that we believe are important to our operation and business.

Since 2009, we have obtained several loans from China Construction Bank as follows. Pursuant to a RMB800 million five-year term loan agreement entered into in January 2009 with China Construction Bank, we obtained four long-term loans in the amounts of RMB450 million in January 2009, RMB150 million in June 2009, RMB190 million in June 2009 and RMB10 million in June 2009. These loans were used to finance the construction of our polysilicon production facility in Meishan, Sichuan Province. We have repaid the loans in full based on the agreed repayment schedule as of December 31, 2015.


In April 2011, we obtained a loan of RMB170 million with a term of 60 months from Bank of China. We entered into a supplement agreement with Bank of China on December 31, 2015 to extend the term of the loan to 78 months. We repaid the loan based on the agreed repayment schedule. As of December 31, 2015, the remaining balance was RMB20 million ($3.1 million), which is to be repaid in June 2016 and June 2017. The proceeds from this loan were used to finance the improvement of our production facilities.

 

In March 2013, we obtained two four-year term loans from a lender in Korea totaling Korean Won 35.7 billion. These loans arebillion ($33.4 million) to be repaid in March 2017. In 2017, we extended the maturity date by three years to March 2020. The proceeds from these loans were to be used to finance our PV plant projects in Romania.

 

The weighted average interest rate for our long-term loans was approximately 6.58%5.8% in 2015.2017. Interest rates are variablefixed for certain portions of the long-term loans,financings, and may be updated every three months, once a year, or according to a predetermined schedule based on the applicable benchmark interest rate set by the People’s Bankrate. An aggregate of China or EURIBOR. $38.8$32.5 million of our outstanding long-term loans and other liabilities are expected to mature between 2016 and 2023.in 2020.

 

Some of ourOur long-term loans are secured by collateral such as shares of or other equity interests in our subsidiaries, pledges and security interests over our assets, receivables, inventories, project sites or land use rights, property, plant and equipment or project facilities, and/or guaranteed by our subsidiaries and/or Mr. Li, our director and chief executive officer, and his wife. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions.”

Some of our long-term loan agreementsfinancing arrangements contain financialrestrictive covenants, including requirements obliging the borrowers to maintain(i) obtain lender’s prior approval before entering into any transaction over certain minimum levelsamount after the completion of netthe construction and commencement of operation of the relevant project assets, net profits, debt to asset ratio, ratio of net cash flow to due interest, principle and commission and fee of loan, the ratio of earnings(ii) obtain lender’s prior consent before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, to interest expense, and the ratio of drawn down loan amount to collateral market value, and restrictive covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, (1) dispose of or provide guarantees, pledges, encumbrance or mortgages on our operating assets or long term assets inopening any manner that will increase risk to the lenders, (2) repay shareholders loans or loans from our related parties, (3) distribute dividends to shareholders, (4) enter into other financial obligations with third parties or undertake in full or part liabilities of a third party, (5) take part in any mergers or acquisitions, (6) change the nature of our operations, (7) reduce our paid-in fixed capital, (8) utilize the loan for a purposebank account other than the existing bank account with the lender, and (iii) upon lender’s request, ensure that at least one stated indirector designated by the agreement, (9) increase our financial indebtedness, and (10) agree to the adjustmentlender be appointed as a director of the interest rate upon a lender’s request in responseoperating entity of the relevant project assets and/or the borrower. In addition, we are required to macroeconomic changes.comply with certain financial ratios, such as debt-service coverage ratio and loan life coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2015, Sichuan ReneSola, ReneSola Jiangsu and ReneSola Zhejiang2017, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.covenants under our outstanding long-term financings. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Restrictive covenants and undertakings under our bank loansproject financing arrangements and loan arrangements may limit the manner in which we operate and an event of default under the loan may adversely affect our operations.”

 

Guarantees

As of December 31, 2016, long-term borrowings of $28,835,700 was joint guaranteed by two subsidiaries of the Company.

As of December 31, 2017, short-term borrowings of $6,605,894 and long-term borrowings of $ 32,513,900 were joint guaranteed by the Company and its two subsidiaries. The short-term borrowings of $6,605,894 were also secured by all the shares or ownership interests of the borrower, and project assets owned with carrying value equivalent to 130% of the principal.

80

Issuance of Securities

 

In March and April 2011,connection with our business restructuring in September 2017, we issued $200180 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2018. The net proceeds of the offering was approximately $192.8 million,ordinary shares with a portion of which we used to pay the cost of the capped call transactions that we entered into with an affiliate of one of the initial purchasers, to which we refer to as the hedge counterparty, and the remainder for expansion of polysilicon production capacity. The convertible senior note holders had the right to require us to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their convertible senior notes on March 15, 2016 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible senior notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date. The carryingfair value of such convertible senior notes was $26.1approximately $42.5 million as of December 31, 2015.to ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., a former subsidiary prior to the business restructuring. We repurchased all of the remaining outstanding convertible senior notes during the first quarter of 2016.also issued shares under our share incentive plan.

 

In September 2013,Other than those mentioned above, in 2015, 2016 and 2017, we completed a registered direct offering of 15,000,000 ADSs, representing 30,000,000 of our shares, and warrants to purchase up to 10,500,000 additional shares, representing 35% of warrant coverage in the offering, at approximate $70 million before exercise of warrants.  The net proceeds from the offering was approximately $65.9 million (excluding proceeds from the exercise of warrants) based on the public offering price of $4.67 per ADS and warrants for 35% of an ADS.  The warrants have an initial exercise price of $3.02 per share (or $6.04 per ADS). The warrants are exercisable immediately and will expire four years from the date of issuance.  We have used the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital and polysilicon plant optimization.did not issue any other securities.


Cash Flows and Working Capital

 

We have significant working capital commitments because manyIn September 2017, we completed a non-cash restructuring to dispose of our silicon raw materials suppliers require us to make payments immediately upon shipping and, historically, prepayments in advance of shipment. Due to the volatilitysubstantially all of the price of polysilicon, sufficient working capitalassets and access to financing to allow for the purchase of silicon raw materials are critical to growing our business. Our short-term borrowings increased from $654.7 million in 2014 to $668.8 million in 2015. Our advances to suppliers decreased from $27.5 million as of December 31, 2014 to $18.5 million as of December 31, 2015. Under the current market conditions, prepayment to suppliers in advance of shipment has become less common. We perform credit evaluations of the financial condition of our suppliers to which we make prepayments.

Our total accounts and notes receivable decreased from $236.6 million as of December 31, 2013 to $125.7 million as of December 31, 2014 and increased to $161.2 million in 2015. Our allowance for doubtful accounts increased from $4.9 million as of December 31, 2013 to $7.6 million as of December 31, 2014 and decreased to $5.2 million in 2015. The decrease in our accounts receivable balance from 2013 to 2014 was primarily the result of more effective accounts receivable management. The increase in our accounts receivable balance from 2014 to 2015 was primarily due to the increase in our notes receivables, which mainly relates to the sales we made to a domestic customer who paid us with notes in the fourth quarter of 2015. For all customers, including those to whom longer credit terms are negotiated and granted, we assess a number of factors to determine whether collection is reasonably assured, including past transaction history with the customer and their overall creditworthiness. The aging of our accounts receivable increased from 2013 to 2014, and decreased from 2014 to 2015. Our allowance for doubtful accounts increased in 2014, compared with 2013, to reflect the negative trend of longer aged receivables, which we believe was symptomatic of difficult market conditions and constrained liquidity conditions for the solar industry overall. Our allowance for doubtful accounts decreased in 2015, compared with 2014, primarily dueliabilities related to our strengthened collection effortsmanufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and the tightened credit policy extended to our customers. In 2014 and 2015, we recorded accounts receivable write-off of $2.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, primarily due to confirmed unrecoverable debts. While the business environment improved in 2015, to the extent that the overall negative environment which impacted the solar industry returns, or deteriorates, this negative trend could be exacerbated and write-offs could continue to occur. In 2016, we plan to closely manage our accounts receivable balances by strengthening our collection effortsmodule manufacturing, as well as managing our inventorythe LED distribution business. This resulted in order to preserve cash, and effectively manage ouran improvement in working capital requirements.capital.

 

The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands) 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $118,561  $(121,689) $2,210 
Net cash (used in) provided investing activities  (189,602)  115,461   (40,027)
Net cash provided by financing activities  67,620   13,049   (11,158)
Effect of exchange rate changes  (3,089)  6,254   (12,827)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (6,510)  13,075   (61,802)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year  93,283   86,773   99,848 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $86,773  $99,848  $38,045 
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
  (in thousands) 
       
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from continuing operations $39,035  $(24,007)$(46,684)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from discontinued operations  (36,825)  51,541   65,114 
Net cash provided by operating activities  2,210   27,534   18,430 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from continuing operation  (4,406)  3,191   (79,939)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from discontinued operation  (35,621)  38,969   (76,415)
Net cash (used in) provided by provided investing activities  (40,027)  42,160   (156,354)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from continuing operation  (55,787)  (28,553)  52,898 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from discontinued operation  44,629   (33,821)  49,506 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (11,158)  (62,374)  102,404 
Effect of exchange rate changes  (12,827)  (8,029)  11,613 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (61,802)  (709)  (23,907)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year  99,847   38,045   37,336 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $38,045  $37,336  $13,429 

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities in 20152017 was $2.2$18.4 million, primarily due to (i) a decrease in inventory of $121.8 million, primarily due to our scale-back of OEM arrangements and a decrease in our module sales volume, (ii) depreciation of $90.1 million, and (iii) an increase in deferred revenue of $32.4 million, partially offset by (i) a decrease in accounts payable of $159.0 million, primarily due to effective management of accounts payable, and (ii) a decrease in advances from customers of $58.7 million, and (iii) an increase in accounts and notes receivable of $58.7 million, primarily due to the sales we made to a domestic customer who paid us with notes in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Netamong which net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $46.7 million and net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operation was $65.1 million. $46.7 million net cash used in 2014 was $121.7 million,operating activities from continuing operations primarily due toresulted from (i) a net lossincome from continuing operations of $33.6 million primarily due to the continuing oversupply conditions in the solar power products market,$3.2 million; (ii) a decrease in accounts payabledepreciation of $174.9 million, primarily due to effective management$4.5 million; (iii) share-based compensation of accounts payable, (iii) an$0.9 million; (iv) increase in inventory levelsworking capital of $19.2 million arising from the expansion of our module business, and (iv) an increase in project asset levels of $33.9 million arising from the expansion of our power plant business, partially offset by (i) depreciation of $90.2 million and (ii) a decrease in accounts receivable of $45.6 million as we manage the accounts receivable effectively.$55.3 million.


Net cash provided by operating activities in 20132016 was $118.6$27.5 million, among which net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $24.0 million and net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operation was $51.5 million. $24.0 million net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations primarily due to theresulted from (i) net income from continuing operations of $0.09 million; (ii) depreciation of $2.4 million; (iii) increase in net revenues as a resultworking capital of the gradual recovery of the industry, an increase in accounts payable as we negotiated longer payment terms from suppliers, an increase in advances from customers and increases in inventory and accounts receivable levels arising from the expansion of our module business. The increases were$23.8 million, partially offset by agains on disposal of solar project of $2.5 million.

81

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2015 was $2.2 million, among which net loss of $258.9 million less the impact of depreciation and impairment of long-lived assets of $112.9cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $39.0 million and $202.8net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operation was $36.8 million. $39.0 million respectively.net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations primarily resulted from (i) net income from continuing operations of $20.2 million (ii) depreciation of $3.5 million; (iii) loss on derivatives of $8.0 million; (iv) decrease in working capital of $20.1 million, partially offset by (i) gains on on repurchase of convertible notes of $13.7 million.

 

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities in 2017 was $156.4 million comprising of (i) purchase of property, plant and equipment of $80.3 million and (ii) lending to related parties of $1.6 million and (iii) net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations of $76.4 million, partially offset by collection of lending to related parties of $0.2 million.

Net cash provided by investing activities in 2016 was $42.2 million, primarily resulting from (i) proceeds from disposal of solar project of $3.2 million and (ii) net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations of $39.0 million.

 

Net cash used in investing activities in 2015 was $40.0 million, primarily due to (i) an increasenet cash paid on settlement of derivatives of $6.3 million and (ii) net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations of $35.6 million, partially offset by changes in restricted cash of $24.5 million, and (ii) a $14.4 million cash used for purchase of property, plant and equipment in connection with our module and wafer business.$1.9 million.

Financing Activities

 

Net cash provided by investingfinancing activities in 20142017 was $115.5$102.4 million, primarily due tocomprising of (i) $134.6 millionproceed from changesbank borrowings of restricted cash,$6.1 million; (ii) $18.7 millionborrowing from related parties of $11.3 million; (iii) proceeds from disposalfailed sale-lease back agreements of subsidiaries$38.7 million and (iii) $12.2(iv) net cash provided by financing activities from discontinued operation of $49.5 million, of cash received from government subsidies, partially offset by $51.8(i) repayment of borrowings from related parties of $2.0 million and (ii) repayment of cash used for property, plantcapital lease obligation and equipment expenditures in connection with the expansionfailed sale-lease back financing of our module business.$1.2 million.

 

Net cash used in investingfinancing activities in 20132016 was $189.6$62.4 million, primarily due to increases(i) repurchase of convertible notes of $25.9 million; (ii) repayment of bank borrowings of $1.1 million; (iii) cash paid for common shares repurchase of $1.5 million and (iv) cash used in property, plant and equipment expenditures in connection with our solar power projects in Qinghai and Xinjiang, and restricted cash, which was partially offset by the cash receivedfinancing activities from government subsidies.

Financing Activitiesdiscontinued operations of $33.8 million.

 

Net cash used in financing activities in 2015 was $11.2 million, primarily due to (i) $1,052.6 millionrepurchase of theconvertible notes of $54.4 million; (ii) repayment of bank borrowings and (ii) $54.4 million of the$1.2 million; (iii) cash paid for common shares repurchase of convertible senior notes, which was$0.8 million, partially offset by $1,100.0 million of(i) proceeds from bank borrowings.

Netexercise of stock options of $0.6 million and (ii) net cash provided by financing activities in 2014 was $13.0 million, primarily due to $1.1 billionfrom discontinued operation of proceeds from bank borrowing, which was partially offset by (i) $1.0 billion of the repayment of bank borrowings and (ii) $9.8 million of the repurchase of convertible senior notes.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2013 was $67.6 million, primarily due to proceeds from bank borrowing and the issuance of common shares, which was partially offset by the repayment of bank borrowings.$44.6 million.

 

As of December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015,2016, our net current liabilities were $506.2 million, $477.3 million and $466.1 million, respectively.working capital deficit was $396.9 million. As of December 31, 2017, our working capital was $24.9 million.

 

We have taken, and are continuing to take, the following measures to manage our liquidity difficulties:liquidity: (i) closely monitoring and managing our working capital, which may involve seeking extended payment terms from our suppliers, strengthening accounts receivable collection efforts, implementing more stringent inventory management procedures and considering liquidation of accounts receivable by discounting banknotes with the relevant financial institutions, as needed, to maintain sufficient cash flows from operations to meet our liquidity requirements; and (ii) obtaining additional debt facilities in order to fund working capital needs, as necessary.

 

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, anticipated cash flows from our operations, including project assets, and bank borrowingscontinued support from financial institutions, fund investors and financing lease companies, in the form of renewed and additional short-term or long-term financings (including development loans, construction loans and project financings), will be sufficienttosufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for the foreseeable future based on current capital expenditure and operation plans. We may, however, require additional cash due to changing business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions by us. If this were to occur, we may seek to make additional securities offerings or borrowings.


82

Restrictions on Cash Dividends

 

For a discussion on the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to our company, and the impact this has on our ability to meet our cash obligations, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Our ability to make distributions and other payments to our shareholders depends to a significant extent upon the distribution of earnings and other payment made by ReneSola Zhejiang”our subsidiaries” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Under the Enterprise Income Tax Law, dividends payable by us and gains on the disposition of our shares or ADSs could be subject to PRC taxation.”

 

Capital Expenditures

We had capital expenditures of $126.2 million, $54.5 million and $16.8 million in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. We had outstanding advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment of $2.2 million, $1.8 million and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, our commitments outstanding for purchases of property, plant and equipment were $16.5 million, $10.1 million and nil, respectively. Our capital expenditures were used primarily to optimize our Sichuan polysilicon facility, to maintain our cell and module manufacturing plant in Yixing, Jiangsu Province, to purchase production equipment, to acquire land-use rights for each of the plants and to build up our solar power product business and downstream solar power project business.

While we expect to steadily increase the solar wafer manufacturing capacity in 2016 through technique improvement, we plan to maintain our existing polysilicon, cell and module manufacturing capacities in 2016. We do not currently plan to build new facilities, but do plan to incur total capital expenditures of up to $14.0 million to maintain or enhance our existing manufacturing facilities during 2016 and 2017.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or FASB,(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updates, or ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), to clarify” a new standard on revenue which will supersede the principles of recognizing revenue and create common revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” which delays the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. The FASB also agreed to allow entities to choose to adopt the standard as of the original effective date. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the implementation guidance between U.S. GAAPon principal versus agent considerations. Further, in 2016, the FASB issued five amendments to the new standard. The new standard, as amended, sets forth a single comprehensive model for recognizing and International Financial Reporting Standards,reporting revenues. The new guidance requires us to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or IFRS. Anservices to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity has the optionexpects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance requires us to apply the provisionsfollowing steps: (1) identify the contract with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation. The standard also requires additional financial statement disclosures that will enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of ASU 2014-09 either retrospectivelyrevenues and cash flows relating to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying thiscustomer contracts. The standard recognized at the date of initial application. ASU 2014-09 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2016, and early31, 2017. Early adoption is permitted but not permitted. In August, 2015,before periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017. We expect to adopt the FASB updated thisstandard starting January 1, 2018. The standard allows for two methods of adoption: the full retrospective adoption, which requires the standard to ASU 2015-14, the amendments in this Update defer the effective date of Update 2014 -09, that the Update should be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and earlier application is permitted onlyeach prior period presented, or the modified retrospective adoption, which requires the cumulative effect of adoption to be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016,adoption. We anticipate adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method.

We expect this adoption to primarily affect certain solar power project sales arrangements currently accounted for under ASC 360-20, which requires us to evaluate whether such arrangements have any forms of continuing involvement that may affect the revenue or profit recognition of the transactions, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.arrangements with prohibited forms of continuing involvement requiring us to reduce the potential profit on a project sale by the maximum exposure to loss, variable considerations for energy performance guarantees, minimum electricity end subscription commitments for sales of project asset rights . We are still in the process of assessingidentifying and evaluating all of its contracts with customers, and comparing the potential financial impactrequirements of the adoption will have to us.

In February 2015,new standard with its current accounting policies. This includes an analysis of, among other things: the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments totiming of revenue recognition, the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 modifies existing consolidation guidance related to (i) limited partnerships and similar legal entities, (ii) the evaluationallocation of variable interestsvalue for fees paid to decision makers or service providers, (iii) the effect of feeperformance obligations that might be bundled within contractual arrangements, and related partiesthe method of recording revenue on a gross vs. net basis. Further, we are evaluating whether any revenue-related costs for commissions, customer acquisition or similar costs, variable considerations would be affected by the primary beneficiary determination, and (iv) certain investment funds. These changes are expected to limit the number of consolidation models and place more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted.new standard. We are still inalso evaluating the process of assessing the potential financial impact to us.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03 as part of its simplification initiative. Under the ASU, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The requirementadditional required disclosure, including disaggregation of revenue, under the new standard. With the analysis performed to present debt issuance costs as a direct reductiondate, we anticipate that ASU 2014-09, which supersedes the real estate sales guidance under ASC 360-20, will not result in material earlier recognition of the related debt liability (rather than as an asset) isrevenue and profit. In addition, we expect revenue recognition for other sales arrangements, to remain materially consistent with the presentation of debt discounts under U.S. GAAP. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15 related with the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements, under which the SEC staff stated it would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. We plan to adopt the new standard for the year beginning January 1, 2016, and do not expect the adoption to have a significant net impact on the financial statements.


In July, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 as part of its simplification initiative. The ASU changes the way of measurement on inventory, which currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The amendments in this Update require an entity to measure inventory within the scope of this Update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. We plan to adopt the new standard for the year beginning January 1, 2016, and is still in the process of assessing the potential financial impact to us.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-17 as part of its simplification initiative. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this Update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. We plan to adopt the new standard for the year beginning January 1, 2016, and do not expect the adoption to have a significant net impact on the financial statements.current practice.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10)-Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 changes how entities measure certain equity investments and present changes in the fair value of financial liabilities measured under the fair value option that are attributable to their own credit. The guidance also changes certain disclosure requirements and other aspects of current U.S. GAAP. Further, in March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-03 “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which provides further guidance on adjustments for observable transaction for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value and clarification on fair value option for liabilities instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017, and certain provisions of the guidance may be early adopted. We are still evaluatingdo not expect the impactadoption of ASU 2016-01 willand 2018-03 to have a significant impact on theour consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

83

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases"Leases (Topic 842)". This update requires an entity to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and to disclose key information about the entity's leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early application permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required.  We are still in the process of assessing the potential financial impact the adoption will have to us.

 

In March, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07,Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 (ASU 2016-09), “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)”, which eliminates eliminatesimplifies several aspects of the requirement to retroactively adoptaccounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublic entities, including the equity method of accounting. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interestaccounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the investee tostatement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adopt is permitted. We have adopted the current basisstandard in the first quarter of 2017 and assessed that there’s no material impact of the investor’s previously held intereststandard on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), to provide financial statement users with more useful information about expected credit losses. ASU 2016-13 also changes how entities measure credit losses on financial instruments and adopt the equity methodtiming of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. The amendments in this Updatewhen such losses are recorded. ASU 2016-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence that result in the2019, and early adoption of the equity method. Earlier application is permitted.permitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are in the process ofcurrently evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidanceASU 2016-13 will have on theour consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

 

In MarchAugust, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, which amendsAccounting Standards Update No. 2016-15 (ASU 2016-15), “Statement of Cash Flows”. The new guidance is intended to reduce the principal-versus-agent implementation guidancediversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and illustrationscash payments are presented and classified in the Board's new revenue standard (ASC 606)statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16 (ASU 2016-16), “Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”. The amendments in this update clarifynew guidance requires that entities recognize the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. When another party, along withincome tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the reporting entity,transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is involved in providing goods or servicessold to a customer, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (as a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (as an agent).outside party. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period (as of the first interim period if an entity issues interim financial statements). The new guidance requires adoption on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-16 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

In November, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18 (ASU 2016-18), “Statement of Cash Flows”, which amends ASC 230 to add or clarify guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-18 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard introduces a screen for determining when assets acquired are not a business and clarifies that a business must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that contribute to an output to be considered a business. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We have adopted ASU 2017-01 in the current year and the adoption had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

84

In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) – Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, to simplify certain aspects of hedge accounting for both non-financial and financial risks and better align the recognition and measurement of hedge results with an entity’s risk management activities. ASU 2017-12 also amends certain presentation and disclosure requirements for hedging activities and changes how an entity assesses hedge effectiveness. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. We are still incurrently evaluating the process of assessing the potential financial impact the adoptionASU 2017-12 will have on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to us.allow entities to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Act on items within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact ASU 2018-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

 

C.Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.Intellectual Property

 

Research and Development

We focus our research and development effortsrely primarily on improving our manufacturing efficiency, the quality of our products and new product development. As of December 31, 2015, our research and development team consisted of 288 experienced researchers and engineers. In addition, some of our manufacturing employees regularly participate in our research and development programs. A part of our research and development is conducted at our solar power technology development center, which is outfitted with advanced equipment for the research of solar power. Our recent technological achievements include:


·Reducing cost: We have further developed a new technology to recycle products at the polysilicon manufacturing stage in order to reduce costs. We also continued to research the use of carbon composite materials, which we believe will help lower costs and expose us to new markets.

·Increasing yield: Our innovations enable us to increase the yield of our ingots, reduce our electricity costs and enhance the utilization rate of our furnaces and consumables, such as graphite, carbon fiber, steel wire and slurry

·Increasing efficiency: We have developed a variety of proprietary methods for producing wafers, including a special chemical doping formula for wafers to produce high-efficiency, low-degradation solar cells, a new casting process for multicrystalline solar wafers to increase solar cell conversion efficiency, and a customized monocrystalline hot-zone using simulation technology to reduce oxygen content and power consumption for high efficiency and low degradation.

We have also started manufacturing our A+++ wafer, a multicrystalline wafer, since March 2014. Our A+++ wafer has a conversion efficiency rate of 17.8%, which is 0.15% higher than the A++ wafer.

We have invested in the research and development of solar cell technology. The average conversion efficiency rates of our monocrystalline and multicrystalline solar cells manufactured reached 19.2% and 17.8%, respectively, as of December 31, 2015, which is in line with the market, based on our estimates.

·We have begun researching small-scale storage systems and the development of our own AC-OC optimizer and low-oxygen concentration solar wafers and carbon composite materials, which we believe will help improve conversion efficiencies. We have launched our off-grid, all-in-one storage system product, which incorporates a controller, MPPT battery charger, inverter and fast power switch in one system, supporting both acid and lithium batteries. As of December 31, 2015, we developed 10 kits for energy storage systems, ranging from 500 watts to 8,000 watts, all of which were available for purchase. In 2016, we plan to focus on introducing these systems to the market.

·Improving manufacturing process: We have invested in the research and development of solar wafer technology. For example, our A+++ wafer, a new multicrystalline wafer, improves solar cell efficiency. We have developed our own in-house diamond steel wires, which can improve solar wafer manufacturing processes through the use of resin-plated diamond steel wires.

We have invested in the research and development of solar module technology. For example, our new Virtus A++ manufacturing technology used to create the Virtus II® products has been streamlined such that products can be manufactured with less energy input, meaning that they are both environmentally friendly and cheaper to manufacture. We have also begun optimizing the module structure since the middle of 2014 while ensuring our carrying capacity and reliability. We believe that such structural improvement will help reduce packing and transportation costs.

Our Micro Replus™ can be used specifically with our solar modules in solar systems for power conversion and can be made available as a standalone microinverter or integrated with our panel for a turnkey AC module.

Through our continuous technological innovation and improvements in manufacturing efficiency, we were able to reduce our silicon consumption rate to 4.75 grams per watt as of December 31, 2015. Our wafer processing cost was $0.08 per watt during the same period, compared to $0.11 per watt as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

We plan to continue to devote substantial resources to research and development in order to further improve our manufacturing processes, reduce manufacturing costs, increase product performance, enhance our solar technical capabilities and expand our green energy product portfolio. We plan to focus our research and development in the following areas:

·Polysilicon production. We are seeking to continue to fine-tune the closed-loop modified Siemens process system at our Meishan polysilicon manufacturing facility and exceeding its current designed capacity. We aim to further reduce production costs by increasing the TCS production output, reducing the power consumption and improving the recycling conversion ratio for converting by-products into TCS.

·Wafer manufacturing. We will continue to reduce the cost of manufacturing solar wafers by, among other, improving the ingot-pulling speed for manufacturing of monocrystalline wafers, optimizing our manufacturing equipment and process routine, upgrading from manual programs to semi-automatic or automatic programs, increasing the purity of the ingots we produce, slicing thinner wafers, reducing wafer breakage rates, and enhancing the processes to reduce quality control cost.

·Cell manufacturing. We will continue to develop technologies to manufacture high-conversion efficiency solar cells with improved performance. As of December 31, 2015, we were able to achieve conversion efficiency rates of 19.5% for monocrystalline cells and 18.35% for multicrystalline cells manufactured using our solar wafers.

·Module manufacturing. We will continue to improve the process of module manufacturing by shortening the lamination time to reduce time and power consumption. We will also improve the structure of the module frame to reduce the adhesive sealant on the front side of the module and reduce the time for cleaning the module. We will consider using tempered glass with anti-reflecting film on the module to increase the module efficiency. We will continue to reduce our module manufacturing costs through a reduction in material costs and improvements in our manufacturing methods, and capitalize on the business’s higher margins relative to wafer manufacturing.

·Inverter technology. We will continue to reduce the thickness, volume and weight of micro inverter to fit the frame of a PV module. We will also improve the efficiency of micro inverse by changing the connection method of micro inverse output terminal. We will continue to reduce the production cost by simplifying the circuit, reducing volume and weight of the inverter, and improve product efficiency by improving the device parameters, and reducing power consumption.

In each of the three years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, our research and development expenses were approximately $46.5 million, $52.6 million and $43.9 million, respectively.

Intellectual Property

As of December 31, 2015, we had 235 patents and 86 pending patent applications in China and 4 pending international patent applications. These patents and patent applications relate to the technologies in our products and the technologies utilized in our manufacturing processes. We intend to continue to assess appropriate opportunities for patent protection of critical aspects of our technologies. Our patents and our pending patent applications relate to improvements in product conversion efficiencies, improvements of the recycling, sorting and purification of silicon raw materials, ingot casting and wafer slicing processes.

We also rely on a combination of trade secrets, and employee contractual protections and other contractual restrictions to establish and protect our intellectual properties and proprietary rights. We believe that many elements of our solar power products and manufacturing processes involve proprietary know-how, technology or data that are not covered by patents or patent applications, including technical processes, equipment designs, algorithms and procedures. We take security measures to protect these elements. All of our research and development personnel have entered into confidentiality agreements with us. These agreements address intellectual property protection issues and require our employees to assign to us all of the inventions, designs and technologies that they develop when utilizing our resources or when performing their employment-related duties.

We have obtained registration of the “ReneSola” trademark in China, the European Union, Japan, Korea, the United States, Taiwan, Singapore, Canada, Israel, Australia, Dominica, Mexico, Malaysia, Chile, New Zealand, Argentina, Turkey, South Africa See “Item 3. Key Information⸻D. Risks Factors⸻Risks Related to Our Business⸻Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights may undermine our competitive position, and India.

We also filed trademark registration applications for “ReneSola” and relevant designs in Thailand, Brazil and Indonesia and filed trademark registration applications of different commodity categories for “ReneSola” in Canada, Turkey, Sri Lanka and Mexico.


We have also obtained the registration of the “Replus by ReneSola” trademark in the European Union, Mexico, Australia, Japan, Taiwan and the United States. We filed trademark application for “Replus by ReneSola” in China in 2013.litigation to protect our intellectual property rights may be costly.”

 

D.Trend Information

 

Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for the period from January 1, 20152017 to December 31, 20152017 that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our net revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause reported financial information not necessarily to be indicative of future operating results or financial conditions.

 

E.Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2015, we provided guarantee to Zhejiang Ruixu, our previous wholly-owned subsidiary which we disposed in January 2014, with respect to its loan facilities from China Development Bank of $31.3 million for 12.5 years and $46.9 million for 12.25 years as of March 2014. We began to provide guarantee to Zhejiang Ruixu on these loan facilities prior to our disposal of Zhejiang Ruixu. We do not believe the fair value of such loan guarantee was material as of December 31, 2015.

Other than as disclosed above, as of December 31, 2015,2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that had or were reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

 

85

F.Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

 

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015:2017:

  Payments Due by Period 
Contractual Obligations Total  Less than
1 year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  More than 5 years 
  (in thousands) 
Long-term borrowings(1) $39,881  $1,105  $33,988  $2,551  $2,237 
Purchase obligations for raw materials(2)  45,528   20,016   25,512   ¾   ¾ 
Convertible senior notes  26,145   26,145   

¾

   

¾

   

¾

 
Total $111,555  $47,266  $59,501  $2,551  $2,237 

 

  Payments Due by Period 
Contractual Obligations Total  less than 1 year  1-3 years  3-5 years  

More than

5 years

 
  (in thousands) 
Short-term borrowings $6,606  $6,606  $-  $-  $- 
Long-term borrowings  32,514   -   32,514   -   - 
Operating leases  38,571   1,000   2,866   2,689   32,016 
Failed sale-lease back and Capital lease liabilities  67,505   -   17,304   21,124   29,077 
Total $145,196  $7,606  $52,684  $23,813  $61,093 
                     

(1)Included estimated interest payable under contract terms.

(2)Included commitments to purchase silicon raw materials under certain long-term supply agreements with overseas suppliers. Payment due by period cannot be calculated because we are committed to pay $45.5 million over the next two years. The purchase price is subject to adjustment to reflect the prevailing market price on the transaction dates and we expect that all purchases will be used in our production in the normal course of business.

  

For information relating to our long-term loans, including their maturity profiles and provisions that accelerate repayment obligations, see “—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

Other than the contractual obligations and commercial commitments set forth above, we did not have any long-term debt obligations, finance lease obligations, operating lease obligations, purchase obligations or other long-term liabilities as of December 31, 2015.2017.

 

G.Safe Harbor

 

We make “forward-looking statements” throughout this annual report, suchunder the “safe harbor” provision under Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as our expected manufacturing capacityamended, and as defined in 2015 and our estimated average selling pricesthe U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of our wafer products in 2015.1995. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we describe what we “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” will occur, what “will” or “could” happen, and other similar statements), you must remember that our expectations may not be correct, even though we believe that they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described in this annual report will happen as described or that they will happen at all. You should read this annual report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation, beyond that required by law, to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made, even though our situation will change in the future.


Whether actual results will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and reflect future business decisions that are subject to change. Some of the assumptions, future results and levels of performance expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements we make inevitably will not materialize, and unanticipated events may occur which will affect our results. “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” describes the principal contingencies and uncertainties to which we believe we are subject. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

ITEM 6.DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

 

A.Directors and Senior Management

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our directors and executive officers as of the date of this annual report.

 

Directors and Executive Officers

Age  

Position/Title 

Xianshou Li4749Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Martin Bloom6466Independent Director
Tan Wee Seng6062Independent Director
Julia Xu4446Independent Director
Weiguo Zhou43Independent Director
Yuanyuan (Maggie) Ma4441Director and Interim Chief Financial Officer
Jijun ShiDoran Hole49Chief Executive Officer of North America and Group Vice President of Strategy
Josef Kastner54Vice President of the European Region
Kevin Chen42President of the North America RegionProjects Europe
Shelley Xu3032Vice President of Global Sales
Nick Li39Vice President of Manufacturing ofthe Greater China Module Division
Wei Fang37Vice President of Financial Management, China
Meisie Jiang34Vice President of Financial Management, Overseas
Xiahe Lian45Vice President of Administration of Human ResourceRegion

86

 

Directors

 

Mr. Xianshou Liis our founder and has been our chief executive officer since March 2005. Mr. Li has served as the chairman of the board since March 2016, and served as a director between March 2005 and March 2016. Prior to founding our solar power business in 2005, Mr. Li founded Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd., a manufacturer of solar cell and module products for both commercial and residential applications, and served as its chairman since its inception. Mr. Li also served as the general manager of Yuhuan County Solar Energy Co., Ltd., a manufacturer of mini solar panels and solar cell modules from 2002 to 2006. Prior to that, he worked as an official in the Yuhuan County Culture Bureau in Zhejiang Province from 1997 to 2000. Mr. Li received his bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering management from Zhejiang Industrial University in 1991.

 

Mr. Martin Bloomhas been an independent director since July 2006 and is currently the chairman of the compensation committee and a member of the audit committee. Mr. Bloom served as the chairman of the board between September 2006 and March 2016. In addition, he has been on thea member of board of directors of LB-Shell plc., formerly known as Intelligent Energy, a British fuel cell company, since June 2012, served as the group chief executive officer from June 2016 to December 2017, and has beenserved as the chairman of its nomination committee and a member of its audit committee and remuneration committee since 2014.from 2014 to June 2016.  Mr. Bloom has also been the chairman of the board of directors of MayAir Group, a Malaysian air purification company listed on the London AIM, since May 2015 and chairman of its remuneration committee and a member of its audit committee since May 2015. He was a member of the board of directors of Green & Smart, a Malaysian biogas producer listed on the London AIM, and chairman of its audit committee from May 2016 to September 2017. Mr. Bloom was a member of the board of directors of Starcom plc, an asset tracking company listed on London AIM, and the chairman of its audit committee sincefrom January 2013.2013 to October 2015. Mr. Bloom has almost 40 years of experience in strategic partnering, technology commercialization and business strategy. He has built businesses in the U.S.,United States, Europe and China.Asia. In 2005, Mr. Bloom was appointed to serve as the UK chairman of the China-UK Venture Capital Joint Working Group, launched by the then-Chancellor of the United Kingdom, Gordon Brown, in February 2005, to foster collaboration between the venture capital and private equity industries in China and the United Kingdom. Mr. Bloom worked at Coopers & Lybrand (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) from 1996 to 1997 and was the project manager of a series of technology transfer schemes between the United Kingdom and Japan on behalf of the Department of Trade & Industry of the United Kingdom from 1992 to 1997. Mr. Bloom worked as a corporate strategist at Unilever between 1973 and 1981. Mr. Bloom has a bachelor’s degree with honors in economics from the University of Southampton and a master’s degree in the history of science jointly from Imperial College and University College, London.

 

89 

Mr. Tan Wee Senghas been an independent director since April 2009.Mr.2009. Mr. Tan is currently the chairman of the audit committee and a member of nominating and corporate governance committee. In addition, Mr. Tan is also aan independent non-executive director and chairman of audit committee of Xtep International Holdings Limited, an independent non-executive director and chairman of audit committee of Sa Sa International Holdings Limited, an independent non-executive director and the chairman of the remuneration committee and a member of the audit committee of Biostime International Holdings Limited, an independent non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee of Sinopharm Group Company Limited and an independent non-executive director and the chairman of the audit committee of CIFI Holdings (Group) Co. Ltd., and an independent non-executive director and the chairman of the audit committee and a member of the strategy and investment committee of Sinopharm Group Company Limited, all of which are listed on the Main Board of Hong Kong Stock Exchange, as well as a director and the chairman of the finance & operation committee of Beijing City International School, an academic institution in Beijing. Mr. Tan has been an independent director for 7 Days Group Holdings Limited listed on the NYSE from November 2009 tountil it was taken private in July 2013, when on privatization and he was the chairman of the special committee for privatization from October 2012 to July 2013. Mr. Tan has over 30 years of experience in financial management, corporate finance, merger and acquisition, business management and strategy development. He has also held various management and senior management positions in a number of multinational corporations and China corporations. From 2003 to 2008, he was an executive director, the chief financial officer and the company secretary of Li Ning Company Limited, a company listed on the Main Board of Hong Kong Stock Exchange. From 1999 to 2002, he was the senior vice president of Reuters for China, Mongolia and North Korea regions, and the chief representative of Reuters in China. Prior to that, he served as the managing director of AFE Computer Services Limited, a Reuters subsidiary in Hong Kong mainly engaged in domestic equity and financial information services, a director of Infocast Pty Limited which was a Reuters subsidiary in Australia, and the regional finance manager of Reuters East Asia. Mr. Tan is a professional accountant and a fellow member of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants in the United Kingdom, and the Hong Kong Institute of Directors.

87

 

Ms. Julia Xu has been an independent director since March 2016. Ms. Xu is currently the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee and a member of the audit committee and the compensation committee. Ms. Xu is the founder and currently the Managing Directormanaging director of Oravida, a New Zealand-based group specializing in the branding and promotion of New Zealand’s premium food products primarily for the Chinese market. Prior to establishing Oravida in New Zealand, Ms. Xu was the chief financial officer of ReneSola from April 2010 to June 2011 and the vice president of international corporate finance and corporate communications of ReneSola from March 2009 to March 2010. Ms. Xu has extensive financial markets experience, including earlier roles at Deutsche Bank Hong Kong, Bankers Trust and Lehman Brothers. Ms. Xu obtained her bachelor’s degree in biology from Cornell University in 1995 and received her MBA from Johnson School of Management of Cornell University in 2004.

Executive Officers

 

Mr. Weiguo Zhou has been an independentour director and interim chief financial officer since March 2016.2018. Mr. Zhou is also a member of compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee. Mr. Weiguo Zhou iswas our independent director from March 2016 to March 2018. Mr. Zhou has been serving as the Managing Partnermanaging partner of Shanghai Mountain River Investment Management Limited since July 2015 and the managing partner of Silicon Valley Investment Management Partners, a China-based partnership specializing in investment in information technology and renewable energy area.area since June 2013. In addition, Mr. Zhou was a Partnerpartner of Vangoo Capital Partners, a venture capital firm specializing in investment in early to pre-IPO stage China-based companies, between April 2012 and June 2013. Mr. Zhou has extensive capital markets experience in Asia and held various senior positions in major investment banks, including Executive Directorexecutive director at Goldman Sachs Gaohua Beijing, Vice President at Credit Suisse Beijing and Hong Kong, between August 2007 and April 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Zhou worked at Deutsche Bank'sBank’s Tokyo and Hong Kong offices for more than seven years. Mr. Zhou obtained his bachelor’s degree in economics (major in accounting) from University of Tokyo in 2000.

Executive Officers

 

Ms. Yuanyuan (Maggie) MaMr. Doran Holehas been our chief financialexecutive officer of North America and group vice president of strategy since April 2016. Ms. Ma servedNovember 2017. Mr. Hole joined us in December 2016 as our interim chief financial officer between October 2015 and March 2016. Ms. Ma joined us in February 2011 as our director of internal control and, between October 2013 and October 2015, Ms. Ma served as our vice president of financial control. Ms. Ma has more than 17ReneSola Power Holdings LLC. He brought over 20 years of experience in finance and internal control areas, including over 10 years of management experience. Prior to joining us, Ms. Ma held positions inacross the finance and internal control departments in OSI Group,capital markets with a global leading company of food processing as Asia Pacific finance manager from 2005 to 2011 and in Dell (China) from 1998 to 2004. She holds CICPA certification and received a bachelor’s degree in international accounting from Xiamen University in 1996.

90 

Mr. Jijun Shi has been our president of the European region since January 2012. Mr. Shi has more than 25 years of managerial experience in Europe including over five years of experience in the solar industry.focus on renewable energy. Prior to joining us, Mr. Shi workedHole founded an independent financial consultancy practice company, Coast to Coast Advisors, LLC, to assist investors, lenders and developers with financing and asset sales from April 2016 to December 2016, served as a chief financial officer in EGing Photovoltaic Europe GmbHPristine Sun, LLC, a solar development company, from 2010November 2015 to 2011April 2016 and served as the China managera director at PAIRAN elektronik GmbHDeutsche Bank AG from 2008April 2007 to 2009. From 1998 to 2008, he servedOctober 2015. Mr. Hole also held positions at other multiple institutions such as the manager in China at Hasbach Prüfanlagentechnik GmbHING and had managerial roles with Krahn Chemie GmbH. From 1986 to 1991,Macquarie. Mr. Shi served as an assistant general manager in China International TrustHole is a chartered financial analyst charter holder and Investment Corporation.certified public accountant. Mr. ShiHole received his bachelor’s degree in Germanbusiness administration from Guangzhou Foreign Language Institute in 1983, his master’s degree in German from Shanghai Tongji University in 1986 and his master’s degree from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe University in 1998.of Texas at Austin.

 

Mr. Kevin ChenMr Josef Kastner has been our presidentVice President Projects Europe since September 2017. Mr. Kastner joined us in 2014, leading the EPC team in Europe. During Mr. Kastner’s employment in us, Mr. Kastner started to develop our solar business in Poland in 2015, turning us into the most successful solar company in the Polish market, led the team winning a 116 MW pipeline in Turkey in 2016, which is the largest portfolio of unlicensed projects in Turkey, launched the American region since February 2012. From 2010development ground-mounted solar projects in France in 2017, launched business in Hungary in Sept 2017 and started with construction of first plants in March 2018. Prior to 2012, hejoining us, Mr. Kastner was the directorchief executive officer of project developmentAlpine Green Energia, mainly responsible for EPC service in Trina Solar, where he led the solar power plant development business of that company in America. From 2005 to 2010, he served asrenewable energy projects. Mr. Kastner holds a project manager of business planning and development at Southern California Edison, for which he developed their solar PV program and a variety of business opportunities employing different energy resources. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Chen worked at GE Energy, where he delivered several large-scale projects to international utilities in electrical transmission and distribution systems, as well as completed product development for electrical systems. Mr. Chen received his bachelor’s degree from Southeast University in 1996, his master’s degree in electric powercivil engineering from Iowa State University in 2000 and his MBA fromTechnical University of California at Los Angeles in 2009.Vienna.

 

Ms. Shelley Xu has been our vice president of the Global SalesGreat China region since December 2013.March 2016. Ms. Xu joined us in 2005 and served as our head of silicon purchasing unit from 2005 to 2009, senior sales manager in 2010, vice director of global sourcing in 2011, and general manager of North China from 2012 to November 2013.2013 and vice president of the Global Sales from December 2013 to March 2016. Ms. Xu has over nine years of experience in the solar industry. In 2012, Ms. Xu successfully implemented the penetration of module sales business into domestic market, and achieved a remarkable sales record, fulfilling the obligation to smooth our strategic transition from wafer sales to the downstream market. Ms. Xu graduated from Zhejiang Business Technology Institute in 2005.

Mr. Nick Li has been our vice president of manufacturing of China module division since December 2013. Between September 2011 and December 2013, Mr. Li served as the general manager of our PV wafers business unit and the production director and the general manager of our PV modules business unit in China. Mr. Li has more than six years of experience in semiconductor industry and more than four years of experience in electronics industry. Prior to joining us, he served as the production manager at EEMS (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. from July 2005 to June 2010 and the production supervisor in various companies, including National Semiconductor (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. from 2004 to 2005, Solectron Corporation in Suzhou from 2002 to 2004 and Foxconn Group (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Li received his bachelor’s degree from Jiangxi Agricultural University in 1999.

Mr. Wei Fang has been our vice president of group financial control since August 2012. Mr. Fang first joined us in July 2009 and served as the financial controller of ReneSola Zhejiang and our senior financial controller from July 2009 to July 2012. Mr. Fang has nearly a decade of experience in senior financial management and business management positions in large domestic manufacturing enterprises, and a wealth of practical management experience in the field of overall budgets, funds management, cost control, risk control and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining us, Mr. Fang served as a budget manager and senior finance manager from 2002 to 2005 and as a chief financial controller and operations controller from 2005 to 2009 in a subsidiary of Midea Group. Prior to joining Midea Group, Mr. Fang served as a senior cost control manager in Nanchang Dianhua, Ltd., a state-owned enterprise, from September 2000 to June 2001 and as an accountant in Jiangxi Jianglong, an accounting firm, from July 1999 to June 2000, focusing on cost accounting and auditing. Mr. Fang holds a certificate from the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He received his bachelor’s degree in financial accounting from Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics in 1999 and a MBA degree from Shanghai Jiaotong University in 2013.

Ms. Meisie Jianghas been our vice president of group financial management since October 2013. Ms. Jiang joined us in March 2009 and held the positions of ReneSola’s treasury manager, senior financial manager, financial controller and senior financial controller. Ms. Jiang has over decade of financial management and business management experience as well as management experience in funds management, reporting, financial analysis, foreign exchange, insurance, transfer pricing, credit control and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining us, Ms. Jiang worked in Ernst and Young as a senior accountant focusing on IPO and listed company. Ms. Jiang holds a certificate from the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Ms. Jiang received a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Nanjing Audit University in 2004 and a bachelor’s degree in law from Nanjing University in 2005.

91 

88

 

Ms. Xiahe Lian has been our vice president of administration and human resource since June 2012. As one of the founders of ReneSola Zhejiang, Ms. Lian has been responsible for administration and human resources of that company. Ms. Lian oversees our recruitment and human resource training as well as the establishment of our human resources management system and administrative system. Since 2009, Ms. Lian has also served as our director of corporate culture and created a company magazine named “Path to PV.” In addition, she has set up a charity foundation to foster community-building efforts and social awareness within our company. Ms. Lian also has 16 years of teaching experience. Ms. Lian received her bachelor’s degree from Zhejiang Normal University in 2005 and her MBA degree from Zhejiang University in 2008.

 

The address of our directors and executive officers is c/o ReneSola Ltd, No. 8 Baoqun Road, Yaozhuang, Jiashan, Zhejiang 314117, People’s Republic of China.

 

Employment Agreements

 

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our senior executive officers. We may terminate a senior executive officer’s employment for cause, at any time, without prior notice or remuneration, for certain acts of the officer, including, but not limited to, a material violation of our regulations, failure to perform agreed duties, embezzlement that causes material damage to us, or conviction of a crime. A senior executive officer may terminate his or her employment at any time by prior written notice. Each senior executive officer is entitled to certain benefits upon termination, including a severance payment equal to a specified number of months of his or her then salary if he or she resigns for certain good reasons specified by the agreement or the relevant rules or if we terminate his or her employment without cause.

 

B.Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2017, an aggregate of approximately $1.8$1.4 million in cash was paid to our executive officers and directors. In 2017, we set aside or accrued a total amount of $0.2 million to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits.

 

Share Incentive Plan

 

Our board of directors adopted our 2007 share incentive plan in September 2007, which was amended in January 2009, August 2010, August 2012 and August 2012,2016, to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and promote the success of our business. We have reserved 12,500,000 shares for issuance under our 2007 share incentive plan. As of February 28, 2018, we had an outstanding awards of 5,966,000 shares, excluding awards forfeited pursuant to the terms of our 2007 share incentive plan and the exercised options, and 2,990,100 shares available for future grants.

The following paragraphs describe the principal terms of our 2007 share incentive plan.

 

Administration. Our 2007 share incentive plan is administered by our board of directors or, after our board of directors makes the designation, by our compensation committee. In each case, our board of directors or our compensation committee will determine the provisions, terms and conditions of each option grant, including, but not limited to, the option vesting schedule, repurchase provisions, forfeiture provisions, form of payment upon settlement of the award and payment contingencies.

 

Awards. The following paragraphs briefly describe the principal features of the various awards that may be granted under our 2007 share incentive plan.

 

·Options. Options provide for the right to purchase our shares at a price and period determined by our compensation committee in one or more installments after the grant date.

 

·Restricted Shares. A restricted share award is the grant of our shares determined by our compensation committee. A restricted share is nontransferable, unless otherwise determined by our compensation committee at the time of award and may be repurchased by us upon termination of employment or service during a restricted period. Our compensation committee shall also determine in the award agreement whether the participant will be entitled to vote the restricted shares or receive dividends on such shares.

·Restricted Share Units. Restricted share units represent the right to receive our shares at a specified date in the future, subject to forfeiture of such right. If the restricted share unit has not been forfeited, then on the date specified in the award agreement, we shall deliver to the holder unrestricted shares, which will be freely transferable.

 

Termination of Plan. Unless terminated earlier, our 2007 share incentive plan, as amended and restated on January 21, 2009, August 20, 2010, August 8, 2012 and August 29, 2016, will expire in September 2017.on the tenth anniversary of August 29, 2016, its latest effective date. Our board of directors has the authority to amend or terminate our 2007 share incentive plan subject to shareholders’ approval to the extent necessary to comply with applicable laws and regulations. However, no such action shall adversely affect in any material way any award previously granted without the prior written consent of the recipient.

 

89

Share Options

 

As of March 31, 2016, our board of directors granted certain of our directors, officers and employeesFebruary 28, 2018, we had outstanding options for 6,040,600 shares in our company, excluding options forfeited pursuant to the terms of our 2007 share incentive plan and the exercised options.purchase 5,826,000 shares.

 

The following paragraphs describe the principal terms of our options.

 

Option Agreement. Options granted under our 2007 share incentive plan are evidenced by an option agreement that contains, among other things, provisions concerning exercisability and forfeiture upon termination of employment arrangement, as determined by our board.

 

Vesting Schedule. Options granted under our 2007 share incentive plan vest yearly over a five-year period following a specifiedAt the time of grant, date. The plan has 20% ofwe specify the date or dates on which the options granted vest at the first anniversary of the grant date,can be vested and for the remaining 80%, 20% shall vest at each of the second, third, fourthexercisable, and fifth anniversary of the grant date, subjectmay specify such conditions to the optionee continuing to be an employee on each vesting date.exercise as we deem appropriate.

 

Option Exercise. The term of options granted under our 2007 share incentive plan may not exceed the sixth anniversary of the specified grant date.date, subject to extension approved by certain officer of our company, as specified in the option agreement, to a total term of no more than 10 years.

 

Termination of Options. Where the option agreement permits the exercise of the options that were vested before the recipient’s termination of service with us, or the recipient’s disability or death, the options will terminate to the extent not exercised or purchased on the last day of a specified period or the last day of the original term of the options, whichever occurs first.

 

On August 8, 2012, our board of directors approved an adjustment to the exercise price of options to purchase an aggregate amount of 5,386,600 shares, previously granted under our 2007 share incentive plan, to a new exercise price of $7.35 per ADS (or $1.47 per ADS.ADS prior to the ADS Ratio Change). In addition, on December 31, 2013, our board of directors authorized our chief executive officer to determine the option grant date and exercise price under the 2007 share incentive plan. As a result, the exercise price of certain options granted between August 8, 2012 and December 31, 2013 to purchase an aggregate amount of 950,000 shares were adjusted to $1.47$7.35 per ADS. The exercise price of our options in the amount of 2,590,000 shares to be granted on or after January 1, 2014 was set at $1.47$7.35 per ADS. Among the underlying shares of the outstanding options, 2,773,000 shares were forfeited as of March 31, 2016 due to the departure of certain officers and employees.

The following table summarizes, as of March 31, 2016,February 28, 2018, the outstanding options, excluding options forfeited pursuant to the terms of our 2007 share incentive plan and the options that were exercised on or prior to March 31, 2016,February 28, 2018, that we granted to our directors and officers and to other individuals as a group under our 2007 share incentive plan.

 

Name Shares Underlying
Outstanding Options
 Exercise Price
($/Share)
  Grant Date Expiration Date
Xianshou Li * $0.735  June 21, 2010 June 21, 2016
  * $0.735  August 24, 2010 August 24, 2016
Martin Bloom * $0.735  August 8, 2012 August 8, 2018
Tan Wee Seng * $0.735  August 8, 2012 August 8, 2018
Julia Xu * $0.735  March 8, 2016 March 8, 2022
Weiguo Zhou * $0.735  March 8, 2016 March 8, 2022

Name Shares Underlying
Outstanding Options
  Exercise Price
($/Share)
  Grant Date Expiration Date
Jijun Shi * $0.735  March 19, 2012 March 19, 2018
Kevin Chen * $0.735  June 18, 2012 June 18, 2018
Shelley Xu * $0.735  January 1, 2014 January 1, 2020
Nick Li * $0.735  September 20, 2010 September 20, 2016
  * $0.735  January 1, 2014 January 1, 2020
Wei Fang * $0.735  December 21, 2009 December 21, 2017
  * $0.735  September 17, 2012 September 17, 2018
  * $0.735  September 30, 2014 September 30, 2018
Meisie Jiang * $0.735  June 23, 2009 June 23, 2017
  * $0.735  March 15, 2010 March 15, 2018
  * $0.735  March 21, 2011 March 21, 2017
  * $0.735  January 1, 2014 January 1, 2020
Maggie Ma * $0.735  January 1, 2014 January 1, 2020
  * $0.735  December 31, 2015 December 31, 2021
Xiahe Lian * $0.735  November 30, 2007 November 30, 2017
  * $0.735  September 17, 2012 September 17, 2018
           
Directors and executive officers as a group 4,015,000        
           
           
Other individuals as a group 18,000 $0.735  June 23, 2009 June 23, 2017
  67,600 $0.735  October 9, 2007 October 9, 2017
  62,000 $0.735  December 21, 2009 December 21, 2017
  61,000 $0.735  March 15, 2010 March 15, 2018
  81,000 $0.735  June 21, 2010 June 21, 2016
  41,000 $0.735  September 20, 2010 September 20, 2016
  80,000 $0.735  August 8, 2012 August 8, 2016
  325,000 $0.735  January 1, 2014 January 1, 2020
  200,000 $0.735  June 30, 2014 June 30, 2020
  55,000 $0.735  September 30, 2014 September 30, 2020
  25,000 $0.735  December 31, 2014 December 31, 2020
  450,000 $0.735  June 30, 2015 June 30, 2021
  560,000 $0.735  December 31, 2015 December 31, 2021
Name Shares Underlying
Outstanding Options
  Exercise Price
($/Share)
  Grant Date Expiration Date
Xianshou Li  580,000  $0.735  June 21, 2010 June 21, 2019
   670,000  $0.735  August 24, 2010 August 24, 2019
   1,250,000  $0.735  August 24, 2016 August 24, 2021
Martin Bloom  *  $0.735  August 8, 2012 August 8, 2019
Tan Wee Seng  *  $0.735  August 8, 2012 August 8, 2019
Julia Xu  *  $0.735  March 8, 2016 March 8, 2021
Weiguo Zhou  *  $0.735  March 8, 2016 March 8, 2021
Doran Hole  *  $0.353  November 30, 2017 November 30, 2020
Josef Kastner        
Shelley Xu  

*

  $0.266  January 1, 2018 January 1, 2021
All directors and executive officers as a group  3,500,000         

 

90

Name Shares Underlying
Outstanding Options
  Exercise Price
($/Share)
  Grant Date Expiration Date
Other individuals as a group  100,000  $0.735  November 30, 2007 November 30, 2019
   250,000  $0.735  March 19, 2012 March 19, 2019
   240,000  $0.735  June 18, 2012 June 18, 2017
   370,000  $0.735  September 17, 2012 September 17, 2019
   550,000  $0.735  January 1, 2014 January 1, 2019
   25,000  $0.735  June 30, 2014 June 30, 2019
   100,000  $0.735  September 30, 2014 September 30, 2019
   250,000  $0.735  June 30, 2015 June 30, 2020
   201,000  $0.735  December 31, 2015 December 31, 2020
   90,000  $0.735  April 1, 2016 April 1, 2021
   50,000  $0.735  September 30, 2016 September 30, 2021
   100,000  $0.266  January 1, 2018 January 1, 2021

 

*LessThe options to purchase shares in aggregate held by each of these directors and executive officers represent less than 1% of the total number of our shares outstanding as of March 31, 2016.February 28, 2018.

 

Restricted Share Units

 

As of March 31, 2016, none of ourFebruary 28, 2018, we had 140,000 restricted shares units were outstanding.

 

The following paragraphs describe the principal terms of our restricted share units.

 

Restricted Share Unit Agreement. Restricted shares units granted under our 2007 share incentive plan are evidenced by a restricted shares units agreement that contains, among other things, provisions concerning the vesting schedule and forfeiture upon termination of the employment arrangement, as determined by our board.

94 

 

Vesting Schedule. At the time of grant, we shall specify the date or dates on which the restricted share units shall become fully vested and non-forfeitable, and may specify such conditions to vesting as we deem appropriate.

 

Restrictions. Until the shares are issued upon settlement of the restricted share units, the recipients will not be deemed for any purpose to be, or have rights as, our shareholders by virtue of this award; and the recipients are not entitled to vote any of the shares by virtue of this award. Upon vesting, the restricted share units will no longer be subject to such restrictions or forfeiture (provided the recipients have not terminated their service.) Unless we consent in writing, the restricted share units and all right or interests therein are not transferable except by wills or the laws of descent and distribution.

 

Maturity. At the time of grant, we shall specify the maturity date applicable to each grant of restricted share units which shall be no earlier than the vesting date or dates of the award and may be determined at the election of the grantee. On the maturity date, we shall transfer to the participant one unrestricted, fully transferable share for each restricted share unit scheduled to be paid out on such date and not previously forfeited.

 

Termination. In the event of the termination of a recipient’s employment or service with us, the unvested restricted share units will be subject to forfeiture and the recipient’s right to vest in the restricted share units under the 2007 share incentive plan will terminate. If the termination of employment or service is by reason of death or disability, any restricted share units which otherwise would have vested within one year of the termination shall immediately vest. If the recipient’s termination of service with us is by reason of cause, his/her right to the restricted share units, whether or not previously vested, will terminate concurrently with the termination of service with us.

91

 

C.Board Practices

 

Our board of directors currently consists of five directors. A director is not required to hold any shares in the company by way of qualification. A director may vote with respect to any contract, proposed contract or arrangement in which he is materially interested. A director may exercise all the powers of the company to borrow money, mortgage its undertaking, property and uncalled capital and issue debentures or other securities whenever money is borrowed or as security for any obligation of the company or of any third party.

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

We have an audit committee, a compensation committee and a corporate governance and nominating committee under the board of directors. We have adopted a new charter for each of the three committees. Each committee’s members and functions are described below.

 

Audit Committee. Our audit committee consists of Mr. Tan Wee Seng, Ms. Julia Xu, and Mr. Martin Bloom. Mr. Tan Wee Seng is currently the chairman of the audit committee. Mr. Tan Wee Seng, Ms. Julia Xu and Mr. Martin Bloom all satisfy the independence requirements of the NYSE Listing Rules and SEC regulations. The audit committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the financial statements of our company. The audit committee is responsible for, among other things:

 

·selecting the independent auditors and pre-approving all auditing and non-auditing services permitted to be performed by the independent auditors;

 

·reviewing with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response to such audit problems or difficulties;

 

·reviewing and approving all related party transactions on an ongoing basis;

 

·discussing the annual audited financial statements with management and the independent auditors;

 

·reviewing major issues as to the adequacy of our internal controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies;

 

·annually reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of our audit committee charter;

·meeting separately and periodically with management and the independent auditors; and

 

·reporting regularly to the board of directors.

 

Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee consists of Mr. Martin Bloom, Ms. Julia Xu and Mr. Weiguo Zhou. Mr. Martin Bloom is currently the chairman of the compensation committee. Mr. Martin Bloom and Ms. Julia Xu and Mr. Weiguo Zhou all satisfy the independence requirements of the NYSE Listing Rules and SEC regulations. The compensation committee discharges the responsibility of the board of reviewing and approving the compensation structure, including all forms of compensation relating to our directors and executive officers. Our chief executive officer may not be present at any committee meeting during which his compensation is deliberated. The compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:

 

·reviewing and evaluating at least annually and, if necessary, revising the compensation plans, policies and programs adopted by our management;

 

·reviewing and evaluating at least annually the performance, and determining the compensation, of our chief executive officer;

 

·reviewing and approving our chief executive officer’s employment agreement and amendments thereto, and severance arrangement, if any; and

 

·reviewing all annual bonus, long-term incentive compensation, share option, employee pension and welfare benefit plans.

92

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Ms. Julia Xu, Mr. Tan Wee Seng and Mr. Weiguo Zhou. Ms. Julia Xu is currently the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee. Ms. Julia Xu and Mr. Tan Wee Seng and Mr. Weiguo Zhou all satisfy the independence requirements of the NYSE Listing Rules and SEC regulations. The corporate governance and nominating committee assists the board of directors in selecting individuals qualified to become our directors and in determining the composition of the board and its committees. The corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for, among other things:

 

·recommending to our board of directors for nomination or appointment by the board such candidates as the committee has found to be qualified to be elected or reelected to serve as a member of our board or its committees or to fill any vacancies on our board or its committees, respectively;

 

·reviewing annually the composition of our board of directors and its committees in light of the characteristics of independence, qualification, experience and availability of the board members;

 

·developing and recommending to our board of directors a set of corporate governance guidelines and principles applicable to the company; and

 

·monitoring compliance with the company’s code of business conduct and ethics, including reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal rules and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

Special Committee. Our board of directors received a preliminary non-binding proposal letter dated June 13, 2017 from Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer, to acquire our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business and assume related indebtedness. Our board of directors formed a special committee consisting of Mr. Martin Bloom, Mr. Tan Wee Seng, Ms. Julia Xu and Mr. Weiguo Zhou, each an independent director, on June 13, 2017 to evaluate, negotiate and make recommendations with respect to the proposal and other potential strategic alternative transactions. The special committee was dismissed after the completion of this transaction in September 2017.

During 2017, our special committee met eight times.

 

Duties of Directors

 

Under British Virgin Islands law, our directors have a duty of loyalty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to our best interests. Our directors also have a duty to exercise the skill they actually possess with such care and diligence that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. In fulfilling their duty of care to us, our directors must ensure compliance with our memorandum and articles of association. A shareholder has the right to seek damages if a duty owed by our directors is breached.


Terms of Directors and Officers

 

Our officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the board of directors. At each annual general meeting, one-third of our directors then existing, or if their number is not a multiple of three, then the number nearest to and not exceeding one-third, will be subject to re-election. In addition, as Ms. Julia Xu and Mr. Weiguo Zhou were appointed as directors of the Company by a resolution of directors passed on March 8, 2016, the current term of their appointment runs until the date of the 2016 annual general meeting at which time, their appointment will be put to the shareholders for approval. The directors to retire by rotation shall be those who are longest in office since their election, or by lot should they be of the same seniority. Mr. Martin BloomTan Wee Seng was re-elected at 20152017 annual general meeting. On the assumption that no other director wishes to retire from office at the annual general meetings, Mr. Martin Bloom will be subject to re-election at 2018 annual general meeting; Mr. Xianshou Li will be subject to re-election at 2016 annual general meeting; Mr. Tan Wee Seng will be subject to re-election at 20172019 annual general meeting; Ms. Julia Xu will be subject to re-election at 20182020 annual general meeting; and Mr. Weiguo Zhou will be subject to re-election at the 20192021 annual general meeting; and Mr. Tan Wee Seng will be subject to re-election at the 2022 annual general meeting. We have not entered into any service contracts with the directors providing them with severance benefits upon termination of their terms with us.

 

Our directors have entered into appointment contracts with us and we are not aware any terms which provide for benefits upon termination of appointment, or any appropriate negative statement.

D.Employees

 

We had 7,8745,438 and 6,9534,914 full-time employees including the employees of the discontinued business as of December 31, 20132015 and 2014,2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had 5,438314 full-time employees, including 3,862100 in manufacturing, 263management and supporting, 74 in equipment maintenance, 336project development, 89 in quality assurance, 42technical and operation and 51 in purchasing, 143 in researchoperations and development, 358 in sales and marketing, 369 in general and administrative and 65 in commerce and logistics.maintenance. Substantially allmost of these employees are located in China with a small portion of employees based in Singapore, the United States, Canada, Turkey, Poland, and Europe.the United Kingdom, and other countries. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

93

 

E.Share Ownership

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our shares as of March 31, 2016February 28, 2018 by:

 

·each of our directors and executive officers; and

 

·each person known to us to own beneficially more than 5.0% of our shares.

 

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act, and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities.

 Shares Beneficially Owned  Shares Beneficially Owned 
 Number  

%(1)

  Number  

%(1)

 
Directors and Executive Officers:                
Xianshou Li(2)  49,966,115   24.4%  230,765,109   60.3%
Martin Bloom  *   *   *   * 
Tan Wee Seng  *   *   *   * 
Julia Xu  ¾   ¾   *   * 
Weiguo Zhou  ¾   ¾   *   * 
Maggie Ma  *   * 
Jijun Shi  *   * 
Kevin Chen  *   * 
Doran Hole      
Josef Kastner      
Shelley Xu  *   *   *   * 
Nick Li  *   * 
Wei Fang  *   * 
Meisie Jiang  *   * 
Xiahe Lian  *   * 
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group  51,116,115   24.8%  231,295,109   60.3%
                
Principal Shareholders:                
Champion Era Enterprises Limited(3)  33,501,805   16.5%
Assets Train Limited(4)  13,053,614   6.4%
ReneSola Singapore Pte Ltd.(3)  180,000,000   47.3%
Champion Era Enterprises Limited(4)  33,501,799   8.8%

 

 

*Less than 1% of the total number of our shares outstanding shares as of March 31, 2016.February 28, 2018.

(1)Percentage of beneficial ownership of each listed person is based on 203,343,188380,678,902 shares outstanding (excluding number of shares reserved for future exercise or vest of our awards under our share incentive plan) as of March 31, 2016,February 28, 2018, as well as the shares that such person has the right to acquire by option or other agreement within 60 days after March 31, 2016.February 28, 2018.

 

(2)Consists of 33,501,80533,501,799 shares held by 180,000,000 shares held by ReneSola Singapore Pte Ltd., Champion Era Enterprises Limited, or Champion, 13,053,614 shares held by Assets Train Limited, or Assets Train, 1,135,096 shares held by Dynasty Time Limited, or Dynasty, 1,250,0001,750,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by Mr. Li, within 60 days after March 31, 2016, 775,600February 28, 2018, 974,600 shares held by Ms. Xiahe Lian, the wife of Mr. Li, and 250,000350,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by Ms. Xiahe Lian within 60 days after March 31, 2016.February 28, 2018. Descriptions of Mr. Li’s relationship with ChampionReneSola Singapore Pte Ltd. and Assets TrainChampion are set forth in the notes (4)(3) and (5)(4) below and Mr. Li’s relationshiprelationships with Dynasty isand Assets Train are set forth as follows: Dynasty beneficially holds 3,622,471 of our shares. Dynasty is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and its sole shareholder is Direct Manage Holdings Limited. Direct Manage Holdings Limited is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and wholly owned by the DXJ Family Trust, of which Mr. Xiangjun Dong is the settlor and to which Mr. Dong has administration, voting and management power. The trustee of the DXJ Family Trust is HSBC International Trustee Limited. Dynasty has entered into an irrevocable voting agreement with Mr. Li and Mr. Wu with respect to our shares held by Dynasty. Mr. Li holds sole voting power of 33,501,805 shares held by Champion. Mr. Li also holds shared voting power of 13,053,614 shares held by Assets Train and 1,135,096 shares held by Dynasty pursuant to an irrevocable voting agreement. Mr. Li’s business address is No. 8 Baoqun Road, Yaozhuang Industrial Park, Jiashan County, Zhejiang Province, PRC.

(3)Champion is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and its sole shareholder is Chain Path Limited. Chain Path Limited is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and wholly owned by the LXS Family Trust, of which Mr. Li is the settlor and to which Mr. Li has all administration, voting and management power. The trustee of the LXS Family Trust is HSBC International Trustee Limited. The address for Champion is P.O. Box 957, Offshore Incorporations Centre, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands.

(4)beneficially holds 13,053,614of our shares. Assets Train is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and its sole shareholder is Apex Level Limited. Apex Level Limited is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and wholly owned by the LZM Family Trust, of which Mr. Zhengmin Lian is the settlor and to which Mr. Lian has administration, voting and management power. The trustee of the LZM Family Trust is HSBC International Trustee Limited. Assets Train has entered into an irrevocable voting agreement in respect to its entire holding of 13,053,614 shares with Mr. Li. The address forMr. Li holds sole voting power of 180,000,000 shares held by ReneSola Singapore Pte Ltd. and 33,501,799 shares held by Champion. Mr. Li also holds shared voting power of 13,053,614 shares held by Assets Train is P.O. Box 957, Offshore Incorporations Centre, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands.and 1,135,096 shares held by Dynasty pursuant to irrevocable voting agreements. Mr. Lian’sLi’s business address is No. 8 Baoqun Road, Yaozhuang Industrial Park, Jiashan County, Zhejiang Province, 314117, China.PRC.

(3)ReneSola Singapore Pte Ltd. is an exempt private company limited by shares incorporated with limited liability under the laws of Singapore and is wholly-owned by Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer. The address for ReneSola Singapore Pte Ltd. is located at 1 CleanTech Loop, #02-28 CleanTech One, Singapore (637141).

94

(4)Champion is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and its sole shareholder is Chain Path Limited. Chain Path Limited is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and wholly owned by the LXS Family Trust, of which Mr. Li is the settlor and to which Mr. Li has all administration, voting and management power. The trustee of the LXS Family Trust is HSBC International Trustee Limited. The address for Champion is P.O. Box 957, Offshore Incorporations Centre, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands.

 

Our ADSs are traded on the NYSE and brokers or other nominees may hold ADSs in “street name” for customers who are the beneficial owners of the ADSs. As a result, we may not be aware of each person or group of affiliated persons who beneficially own more than 5.0% of our common stock.

 

As of March 31, 2016,February 28, 2018, the number of our shares issued and outstanding was 203,831,288,381,027,002, among which 488,100348,100 shares represented by 244,05034,810 ADSs were held by the depositary for the ADSs for future exercise or vest of our awards under our 2007 share incentive plan. As of March 31, 2016, 163,743,811February 28, 2018, 160,948,775 of our shares were held as ADSs by the depositary for the ADSs. Other than the depositary, we had no record shareholders in the United States as of March 31, 2016.February 28, 2018.

 

None of our shareholders had different voting rights from other shareholders as of the date of this annual report. We are currently not aware of any arrangement that may, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of our company.

 

For certain information as of February 28, 2018 concerning the outstanding awards we have granted to our directors and executive officers individually pursuant to our share incentive plan, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees⸺B. Compensation⸺Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers⸺Share Incentive Plan.” We are not aware of arrangements for involving the employees in the capital of the company, including any arrangement that involves the issue or grant of options or shares or securities of the company other than those described under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees⸺B. Compensation⸺Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers⸺Share Incentive Plan.”.

ITEM 7.MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

A.Major Shareholders

 

See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.”

 

B.Related Party Transactions

 

AsTransaction with our Chief Executive Officer and ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd.

Our board of December 31, 2013, 2014directors received a preliminary non-binding proposal letter dated June 13, 2017 from Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and 2015, amounts due fromchief executive officer, to acquire our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business and assume related parties were approximately $0.4 million, $0.5 millionindebtedness.

In September 2017, we entered into a share purchase and $0.1 million, respectively. The amounts due from related parties included amounts receivable from sales of goods to Zhejiang Yuhuan, amounts receivable from the sale of goods to Jinko Solar Co.,subscription agreement with ReneSola Singpaore Pte. Ltd., or Jinko,a former subsidiary, and its subsidiaries and amounts receivable from the sale of goods to Xinjiang Garson Co. Ltd., which ceased to be our related party after we sold ReneSola Keping in March 2014. Zhejiang Yuhuan is a company controlled by Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer. Jinko isPursuant to the agreement, we effected a company co-foundednon-cash restructuring following which, among other things, substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to our manufacturing businesses, including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing, as well as the LED distribution business were transferred into ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Upon the closing of this restructuring, all the issued shares of ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd were transferred to Mr. Li.

As a result, bank borrowings in an aggregate amount in excess of RMB3 billion ($461 million) related to the transferred businesses, or the Bank Borrowings, will no longer be consolidated on our balance sheet as all have been assumed by the buyer, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. agreed to cancel approximately $217.3 million of accounts and other payable owed by us and we issued 180 million ordinary shares to ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. Mr. Xianshou Li’s brothers whoLi and his spouse have provided personal guarantee for a majority of the Bank Borrowings. In addition, under the agreement, for a period of 10 years following the closing, ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. agreed to offer us a preferential right to acquire any products of ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., including any polysilicon, solar wafers, solar cells or solar modules, on the same terms as such products are also serving as directors of Jinko.offered to any third party. After the restructuring, we have transformed into a solar project developer and operator, a pure downstream player with robust pipeline projects around the world. As of December 31, 2015, we had no balance of amounts due2017, our debt-to-asset ratio, which is total liabilities divided by total assets, was improved and decreased to 73.0% from Jinko and its subsidiaries.


As93.9% as of December 31, 2013, 20142016. We believe that this transaction has alleviated our going-concern risks and 2015, amounts due to related parties were approximately $9.2 million, $7.6 millionde-listing risks and $2.7 million, respectively. The amounts due to related parties included the loan from Champion, which is controlled by Xianshou Li,enhanced our chairman and chief executive officer, and the purchase of raw materials from Zhejiang Yaohui Photovoltaic Co. Ltd., where a director of our principal PRC subsidiary, ReneSola Zhejiang, is serving as the general manager, Jinko and its subsidiaries, and Jiashan Kaiwo Trading Co. Ltd., which is controlled by Xianshou Li.capital raising capabilities.

 

In August 2014, Champion,

95

Mr. Li and his affiliates are bound by non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions set forth in the agreement. Mr. Li shall also devote a British Virgin Islands company controlled by Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer, agreed to provide us a loan facility in an aggregatereasonable amount of $4 million. The loan facility is effective from August 2014his working time, attention and skills to January 2015the performance of his duties in such capacity and shall diligently serve us in accordance with an interest rate of 5% per annum.  In 2014, we drew down $4 million, which was fully repaid in January 2015. The proceeds from this loan were used to support our working capital.his employment agreement or arrangement with us.

 

In May 2015, Champion agreed to provide us another loan facility in an aggregate amount of $3.0 million. The loan facility is effective from May 2015 to August 2015 with an interest rate of 5% per annum.  In May 2015, we drew down $3.0 million, which was fully repaid in September 2015. The proceeds from this loan were used for working capital.Related party transactions

 

ForDuring the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015, our sale of goods to Jinko2017, related party transactions with ReneSola Singapore Pte., Ltd and its subsidiaries were $2.9 million, $2.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and our purchase of raw materials from Jinko and its subsidiaries were $18.3 million, $0.1 million and nil million, respectively. For the same periods, we had no outsourced inventory to Jinko and subsidiaries.as follows:

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
Purchase of modules from $-  $-  $33,238,377 
Purchased services related to the construction of project assets  -   -   868,158 
Borrowing from(1)  -   -   11,343,739 
Lending to(2) $-  $-  $(1,624,261)

For the years ended as of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, our purchase of raw materials from Zhejiang Yaohui Photovoltaic Co., Ltd. were $5.0 million, $5.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively. The brother of our vice president of administration of human resource and our shareholder is the director of Zhejiang Yaohui Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.

 

We have entered into certain short-term and long-term loans with domestic banks that have been guaranteed by Mr. Xianshou Li, our chairman and chief executive officer, or jointly with his wife, Ms. Xiahe Lian. As of December 31, 2015, we had an aggregate of $318.0 million of outstanding borrowings that were guaranteed, directly or indirectly, by Mr. Xianshou Li and Ms. Xiahe Lian. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Short-term Borrowings” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Long-term Borrowings.”

(1)It represented the borrowings under a loan agreement between us and ReneSola Singapore (“the lender”). The lender grants to the borrower a loan in the principal amount of up to US$ 200 million with annual interest rate of 1%. There is no fixed repayment schedule of this loan.

 

In April 2007, ReneSola Zhejiang leased 24 apartments from Zhejiang Yuhuan for an aggregate rent of RMB36,000 ($5,557) per month In October 2007, the parties entered into a written agreement to record the lease. In an agreement entered into in January 2009, the parties further clarified that this lease shall be a long-term agreement that will remain effective as long as none of the parties wish to terminate it. These leased apartments have been used as housing for ReneSola Zhejiang’s employees. In the first seven month of 2015, 24 apartments were leased to ReneSola Zhejiang under such lease agreement, and in the five months of 2015, 23 apartments were leased. The total rental in 2015 was RMB418,909 ($67,566).

In June 2008, ReneSola Zhejiang lent RMB17 million to Zhejiang Yuhuan to repay its debts owed to Desheng Energy Co., Ltd. In August 2008, we received RMB14 million from Zhejiang Yuhuan. As of December 31, 2015, we offset our outstanding loans to Zhejiang Yuhuan in RMB418,909 ($67,566) against the rents to be paid by us to Zhejiang Yuhuan.

(2)It represented the loan borrowed by ReneSola Singapore's subsidiaries bearing no interests. There is no fixed repayment schedule of this loan.

 

Employment Agreements

 

See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management” for details regarding employment agreements with our senior executive officers.

 

Share Incentives

 

See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers” for a description of share options, restricted shares and restricted share units we have granted to our directors, officers and other individuals as a group.


C.Interests of Experts and Counsel

 

Not applicable.

 

96

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

A.Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

 

We have appended consolidated financial statements filed as part of this annual report.

 

Export Sales

 

For the information of our export sales, seeSee “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Overview of Financial Results—Net Revenues—Geographical Distribution.”

 

Legal and Administrative Proceedings

 

We initiated arbitration proceedings against Linzhou Zhongsheng Steel and Linzhou Zhongsheng Semiconductor Silicon Material Co., Ltd., or Linzhou Zhongsheng Semiconductor, before China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, or CIETAC, for an equity transfer dispute. We sold our 49% equity interest in Linzhou Zhongsheng Semiconductor to Linzhou Zhongsheng Steel in September 2008 at a total consideration of RMB200 million. The share transfer agreement with Linzhou Zhongsheng Steel was amended in December 2008. The amended agreement stipulates that, of the total consideration of RMB200 million, RMB40 million would be paid in cash, RMB4 million would be treated as credit for existing purchases of polysilicon and RMB156 million would be treated as prepayment, to either be used as a credit through a discount to spot market price against future delivery of polysilicon from the joint venture or be repaid in cash, at our discretion. However, Linzhou Zhongsheng Semiconductor stopped the delivery of polysilicon in early 2009 and continued to fail to fulfill its obligations. CIETAC rendered its final award in September 2011, requiring Linzhou Zhongsheng Steel to pay us the remaining equity transfer consideration in the amount of RMB137.3 million. We have applied to the relevant court in China for enforcement of the arbitral award. However, based on a preliminary assessment of the results of the ongoing enforcement actions by the Chinese court authorities, we may not be able to recover all or substantially all, if any, of the amount due from Linzhou Zhongsheng Steel.

As of the date of this annual report, there were several pending disputes with some of our raw material suppliers, including Nature Power Co., Ltd., Nihon B.S.B and Silfine Co., Ltd., over prepayments for silicon raw materials. We have initiated arbitration proceedings against Silfine Co., Ltd. before the Hong Kong International Arbitration Center. In May 2012, an arbitral award was granted in favor of us and ordered Silfine Co., Ltd. to return the prepayments to us. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received the prepayments from Silfine Co., Ltd. pursuant to the arbitral award.

In addition, we are involved in several other legal proceedings. In June 2011, CEP Ltd., or CEP, one of our module customers, sued us in the High Court in Hong Kong for damages of €917,280 for breach of a sales contract. We denied CEP’s assertion and claimed that the termination of the sales contract was due to CEP’s material breach of the sales contract by failure to provide a letter of credit in accordance with the sales contract. A pre-trial in October 2013 and a five-day trial in December 2013 were held. On April 4, 2014, the High Court of Hong Kong handed down judgment and dismissed CEP’s case. On February 11, 2015, a hearing was held before the Court of Appeal upon CEP’s appeal application. A judgment was made on March 12, 2015 following a hearing, and the court ordered CEP’s appeal to be dismissed.

In July 2015, we entered into an agreement with Pristine, a San Francisco-based solar project developer, to form a joint venture in the United States to accelerate our U.S. project development. On December 3, 2015, ReneSola filed an Action in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, alleging that Pristine had breached the joint venture agreement. Pristine subsequently filed a cross-complaint alleging that we breached the joint venture agreement. On March 25, 2016, we entered into a binding settlement term sheet with Pristine and certain of its affiliates to resolve our dispute, dismiss the Action and transfer 88 MW solar energy projects under development in California, North Carolina, and Minnesota by Pristine and its affiliates to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States. Upon consummation of the transfer, we will be the 100% indirect owner of the 88 MW portfolio of solar energy projects.


In May 2014, we filed a case with the First Intermediate Court of Beijing against Tongxiangshenhong, a manufacturer of lighting equipment in China, with respect to its misappropriation of “YUHUIYANGGUANG” as trademarks over certain of its lighting equipment products. The court decided in August 2015 and partly rejected the registration of “YUHUIYANGGUANG” on solar water heater, solar collector and solar heat collector by Tongxiangshenhong, while granting it the registration on street lamp, a lamp cover, a lighting device with luminous tube, lighting apparatus and device and automobile lamp. We appealed this case to the Superior Court of Beijing, which upheld the lower court’s decision in December 2015.

Except as described above, we are not involved in any litigation or other legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse impact on our business or operations. We may from time to time be subject to various judicial or administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. While we do not expect the proceedings described above to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, the outcome of any proceedings is not determinable with certainty and negative outcomes may have a material adverse effect on us.

 

Dividend Policy

 

We have no present plan to declare and pay any dividends on our shares or ADSs in the near future. We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business.

 

We are a limited liability holding company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. WeAfter the completion of our business restructuring in September 2017, we rely on dividends from ReneSola Zhejiang,Renesola PV Power, our subsidiary in China, and any newly formed subsidiaries to fund the payment of dividends, if any, to our shareholders. Current PRC regulations permit our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us only out of their retained profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, our subsidiary in China is required to set aside a certain amount of its retained profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserves. These reserves may not be distributed as cash dividends. Furthermore, when ReneSola ZhejiangRenesola PV Power or any newly formed subsidiary incurs debt on its own behalf, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. For example, according to certain short-term loan agreements between ReneSola Zhejiang and its banks, ReneSola Zhejiang is not permitted to pay dividends for any given year if it has no after-tax profit or if it has any principal or interest due in that year which has not been paid. In addition, pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its Implementing Regulation, which became effective on January 1, 2008, a 10% withholding tax applies to dividends distributed to foreign investors out of the profits generated after January 1, 2008 unless any such non-Chinese enterprise’s tax residency jurisdiction has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement. The British Virgin Islands, where our company was incorporated, does not have such a treaty with China. Thus, we expect that a 10% withholding tax will apply to dividends paid to us by our PRC subsidiaries if we are classified as a non-resident enterprise. We do not currently intend to declare dividends for the foreseeable future.

 

Subject to the approval of our shareholders, our board of directors has complete discretion over distribution of dividends. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.

 

B.Significant Changes

 

Except as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we have not experienced any significant changes since the date of our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

 

ITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING

 

A.Offer and Listing Details

 

Our ADSs each representing two of our shares, have been listed on the NYSE since January 29, 2008. Our ADSs trade2008 and traded under the symbol “SOL.” For the period from January 29, 2008 to April 27, 2016, the trading priceFebruary 9, 2017, each of our ADSs onADS (prior to the NYSE rangedADS Ratio Change) represented two of our shares. On February 10, 2017, we executed the ADS Ratio Change. Effective from $0.91February 10, 2017, the number of our shares represented by each ADS has been changed from two shares to $29.48 per ADS.10 shares. The following table provides the high and low market prices for our ADSs on the NYSE.NYSE, after giving effect to the ADS Ratio Change.

101 

97

 

 

 Trading Price  Trading Price 
 High  Low  High  Low 
 $ $  $ $ 
Quarterly Highs and Lows                
First quarter of 2014  4.46   3.04 
Second quarter of 2014  3.59   2.18 
Third quarter of 2014  3.62   2.29 
Fourth quarter of 2014  3.10   1.21 
First quarter of 2015  1.65   1.20 
Second quarter of 2015  1.97   1.25 
Third quarter of 2015  1.49   0.91 
Fourth quarter of 2015  1.95   0.98 
First quarter of 2016  1.85   1.18   9.25   5.90 
Second quarter of 2016  7.30   5.60 
Third quarter of 2016  6.40   4.74 
Fourth quarter of 2016  5.55   3.05 
First quarter of 2017  3.55   2.15 
Second quarter of 2017  2.92   2.30 
Third quarter of 2017  2.87   2.12 
Fourth quarter of 2017  3.79   2.21 
First quarter of 2018  3.18   2.22 
                
Annual and Monthly Highs and Lows                
2011  13.25   1.45 
2012  3.38   1.08 
2013  6.00   1.25   30.00   6.25 
2014  4.46   1.21   22.30   6.05 
2015  1.97   0.91   9.85   4.56 
2016  9.25   3.05 
2017  3.79   2.12 
October  1.48   0.98   3.14   2.21 
November  1.47   1.22   3.79   2.54 
December  1.95   1.26   3.50   2.64 
2016        
2018        
January  1.85   1.31   3.18   2.65 
February  1.57   1.18   2.72   2.22 
March  1.54   1.33   2.71   2.36 
April (through April 27)  1.46   1.33 
        
April (through April 25)  2.85   2.15 

 

B.Plan of Distribution

 

Not applicable.

 

C.Markets

 

Our ADSs each representing two of our shares, have been listed on the NYSE since January 29, 2008 under the symbol “SOL.” In August 2006, our shares were admitted for trading on the AIM. In November 2010, with the approval of our board of directors, our shares ceased to trade on AIM and our admission to trading on the AIM was cancelled.

 

D.Selling Shareholders

 

Not applicable.

 

E.Dilution

 

Not applicable.

 

F.Expenses of the Issue

 

Not applicable.

 

98

ITEM 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

A.Share Capital

 

Not applicable.


B.Memorandum and Articles of Association

 

We incorporate by reference into this annual report our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our pre-effective amendment No. 2 to Form F-3 registration statement filed with the SEC on September 6, 2013 (File Number 333-189650).

 

We are a British Virgin Islands company and our affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association and the British Virgin Islands Business Companies Act of 2004 (as amended), which is referred to as the Companies Law below.

 

The following are summaries of material provisions of our memorandum and articles of association and the Companies Law insofar as they relate to the material terms of our shares.

 

Registered Office and Objects

 

Our registered office in the British Virgin Islands is located at the offices of Harneys Corporate Services Limited, Craigmuir Chambers, P.O. Box 71, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands.

 

According to Clause 5 of our memorandum of association, subject to the Companies Act and any other British Virgin Islands legislation, our company has full capacity to carry on or undertake any business or activity, do any act or enter into any transaction, and there are no limitations on the business that our Company may carry on.

 

Board of Directors

 

See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

 

Shares

 

General. All of our outstanding shares are fully paid and non-assessable. Certificates representing the shares are issued in registered form. Our shareholders who are non-residents of the British Virgin Islands may freely hold and vote their shares.

 

Dividends. By a resolution of directors, we may declare and pay dividends in money, shares, or other property. Our directors may from time to time pay to the shareholders such interim dividends as appear to the directors to be justified by the profits of our company. No dividends shall be declared and paid unless the directors determine that immediately after the payment of the dividend the value of our assets will exceed our liabilities and we will be able to satisfy our liabilities as they fall due. The holders of our shares are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors subject to the Companies Law.

 

Unissued Shares. Our unissued shares shall be at the disposal of the directors who may without prejudice to any rights previously conferred on the holders of any existing shares or class or series of shares offer, allot, grant options over or otherwise dispose of shares or other securities to such persons, at such times and upon such terms and conditions as we may by resolution of the directors determine. Before issuing shares for a consideration other than money, the directors shall pass a resolution stating the amount to be credited for the issue of the shares, their determination of the reasonable present cash value of the non-money consideration for the issue, and that, in their opinion, the present cash value of the non-money consideration for the issue is not less than the amount to be credited for the issue of the shares.

 

Voting Rights. Each share is entitled to one vote on all matters upon which the shares are entitled to vote. We are required by our memorandum and articles of association to hold an annual general meeting each year. Additionally, our directors may convene meetings of our shareholders at such times and in such manner and places within or outside the British Virgin Islands as the directors consider necessary or desirable. Upon the written request of shareholders holding 10% or more of the outstanding voting rights attaching to our shares the directors shall convene a meeting of shareholders. The director shall give not less than 14 days’ notice of a meeting of shareholders to those persons whose names at the close of business on a day to be determined by the directors appear as shareholders in our share register and are entitled to vote at the meeting.

 

99

A meeting of shareholders is duly constituted if, at the commencement of the meeting, there are present in person or by proxy not less than 50% of the votes of the shares entitled to vote on shareholder resolutions to be considered at the meeting. If a quorum is present, notwithstanding the fact that such quorum may be represented by only one person, then such person or persons may resolve any matter and a certificate signed by such person and accompanied, where such person be a proxy, by a copy of the proxy form shall constitute a valid resolution of shareholders.


If within two hours from the time appointed for the meeting a quorum is not present, the meeting, if convened upon the requisition of shareholders, shall be dissolved; in any other case it shall stand adjourned to the next business day at the same time and place or to such other time and place as the directors may determine, and if at the adjourned meeting there are present within one hour from the time appointed for the meeting in person or by proxy not less than one third of the votes of the shares of each class or series of shares entitled to vote on the resolutions to be considered by the meeting, those present shall constitute a quorum but otherwise the meeting shall be dissolved. The chairman, may, with the consent of the meeting, adjourn any meeting from time to time, and from place to place, but no business shall be transacted at any adjourned meeting other than the business left unfinished at the meeting from which the adjournment took place.

 

An action that may be taken by the shareholders at a meeting may also be taken by a resolution of shareholders consented to in writing without the need for any notice, but if any resolution of shareholders is adopted otherwise than by the unanimous written consent of all shareholders, a copy of such resolution shall forthwith be sent to all shareholders not consenting to such resolution.

 

Mandatory Tender Offer. Except with the consent of our board of directors, when (a) any person acquires, whether or not by a series of transactions over a period of time, our shares which (taken together with shares held or acquired by persons acting in concert with that person) carry 30% or more of the voting rights of our company; or (b) any person who together with persons acting in concert with him, holds not less than 30% but not more than 50% of our voting rights and acquires additional shares resulting in an increase in the percentage of the voting rights held by that person or any person acting in concert with him, such person is required to extend an offer to holders of all the issued shares in our company pursuant to our memorandum and articles of association. References to any person above include persons acting in concert with such person.

 

Transfer of Shares. Certificated shares in our company may be transferred by a written instrument of transfer signed by the transferor and containing the name and address of the transferee, but in the absence of such written evidence of transfer the directors may accept such evidence of a transfer of shares as they consider appropriate. We may also issue shares in uncertificated form. We shall not be required to treat a transferee of a registered share in our Company as a member until the transferee’s name has been entered in the share register.

 

The register of members may be closed at such times and for such periods as the board of directors may from time to time determine, not exceeding in whole thirty days in each year, upon notice being given by advertisement in a leading daily newspaper and in such other newspaper (if any) as may be required by the law of British Virgin Islands and the practice of the NYSE.

 

The board of directors may decline to register a transfer of any share to a person known to be a minor, bankrupt or person who is mentally disordered or a patient for the purpose of any statute relating to mental health. The board of directors may also decline to register any transfer unless:

 

(a)      any written instrument of transfer, duly stamped (if so required), is lodged with us at the registered office or such other place as the board of directors may appoint accompanied by the certificate for the shares to which it relates (except in the case of a transfer by a recognized person or a holder of such shares in respect of whom we are not required by law to deliver a certificate and to whom a certificate has not been issued in respect of such shares);

 

(b)      there is provided such evidence as the board of directors may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer and, if the instrument of transfer is executed by some other person;

 

100

(c)      on his behalf, the authority of that person to do so; any instrument of transfer is in respect of only one class or series of share; and

 

(d)      in the case of a transfer to joint holders, the number of joint holders to whom the share is to be transferred does not exceed four.

104 

 

Liquidation. In the case of the distribution of assets by a voluntary liquidator on a winding-up of our company, subject to payment of, or to discharge of, all claims, debts, liabilities and obligations of our company any surplus assets shall then be distributed amongst the shareholders according to their rights and interests in our company according to our memorandum and articles of association. If the assets available for distribution to members shall be insufficient to pay the whole of the paid up capital, such assets shall be shared on a pro rata basis amongst members entitled to them by reference to the number of fully paid up shares held by such members respectively at the commencement of the winding up.

 

Calls on Shares and Forfeiture of Shares. Our board of directors may from time to time make calls upon shareholders for any amounts unpaid on their shares in a notice served to such shareholders at least 14 days prior to the specified time and place of payment. The shares that have been called upon and remain unpaid at the specified time are subject to forfeiture.

 

Redemption of Shares. The Companies Law provides that subject to the memorandum and articles of association of a company, shareholders holding 90% or more of all the voting shares in a company, may instruct the directors to redeem the shares of the remaining shareholders. The directors shall be required to redeem the shares of the minority shareholders, whether or not the shares are by their terms redeemable. The directors must notify the minority shareholders in writing of the redemption price to be paid for the shares and the manner in which the redemption is to be effected. In the event that a minority shareholder objects to the redemption price to be paid and the parties are unable to agree to the redemption amount payable, the Companies Law sets out a mechanism whereby the shareholder and the company may each appoint an appraiser, who will together appoint a third appraiser and all three appraisers will have the power to determine the fair value of the shares to be compulsorily redeemed. Pursuant to the Companies Law, the determination of the three appraisers shall be binding on the company and the minority shareholder for all purposes.

 

Variations of Rights of Shares. If at any time the issued or unissued shares are divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class may only be varied, whether or not the company is in liquidation, with the consent in writing or by resolution passed at a meeting by the holders of not less than 50% of the issued shares of that class.

 

Inspection of Books and Records. Holders of our shares have a general right under British Virgin Islands law to inspect our books and records on giving written notice to the company. However, the directors have power to refuse the request on the grounds that the inspection would be contrary to the interests of the company. However, we will provide our shareholders with annual audited financial statements.

 

Preferred Shares

 

Our company may from time to time amend and restate our memorandum and articles of association to create one or more classes or series of preferred shares. Pursuant to paragraph 12 of our memorandum of association, a shareholder resolution or a director resolution is currently required to amend the memorandum and articles of association, which shall take effect upon the registration of the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association by the Registrar of Corporate Affairs in the British Virgin Islands. Prior to any issuance of preferred shares, our board of directors may, acting by a resolution of directors, amend the memorandum of association to create one or more classes of preferred shares and authorize the registration of the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association by the Registrar of Corporate Affairs in the British Virgin Islands. Our board of directors may by a resolution of directors, determine the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to the preferred shares, including the designations, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, if any, including, without limitation, the number of shares constituting each such class or series, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges, voting powers, full or limited or no voting powers, and liquidation preferences, of each series that we may sell and to increase or decrease the size of any such class or series of preferred shares, but not below the number of any class or series of preferred shares then issued and outstanding plus the number of shares of such class reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options, rights or warrants or upon the conversion of any outstanding securities issued by our Company convertible into such class of shares. The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class, be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares rankingpari passu therewith or superior thereto. The amended and restated memorandum and articles of association providing for the establishment of any class or series of preferred shares may, to the extent permitted by law, provide that such class or series shall be superior to, rank equally with, or be junior to the preferred shares of any other class or series already in issue.


101

Once the class of preferred shares has been created, preferred shares may then be issued at such times, to such persons, for such consideration and on such terms as our board of directors may by resolution determine.

 

C.Material Contracts

 

We have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described in “Item 4. Information on the Company” or elsewhere in this annual report.business.

 

D.Exchange Controls

 

See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation of Foreign Currency Exchange and Dividend Distribution.”

 

E.Taxation

 

The following summary of the material British Virgin Islands and U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in our ADSs or shares is based upon laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this annual report, all of which are subject to change. This summary does not deal with all possible tax consequences relating to an investment in our ADSs or shares, such as the tax consequences under state, local and other tax laws not addressed herein. To the extent that the discussion relates to matters of British Virgin Islands tax law, it represents the opinion of Harney Westwood & Riegels LLP, our British Virgin Islands counsel.

 

British Virgin Islands Taxation

 

Under the present laws of the British Virgin Islands, there are no applicable taxes on our profits or income. There are no taxes on profits, income, nor is there any capital gains tax, estate duty or inheritance tax applicable to any shares held by non-residents of the British Virgin Islands. In addition, there is no stamp duty or similar duty on the issuance, transfer or redemption of the shares. Dividends remitted to the holders of shares resident outside the British Virgin Islands will not be subject to withholding tax in the British Virgin Islands. We are not subject to any exchange control regulations in the British Virgin Islands.

European Union Directive on the Taxation of Savings Income (Directive 2003/48/EC)

The European Union has formally adopted a Directive regarding the taxation of savings income. From July 1, 2005, member states are required to provide to the tax authorities of another member state details of payments of interest and other similar income paid by a person within its jurisdiction to or for an individual resident in that other member state, except that Austria, Belgium and Luxembourg instead impose a withholding system for a transitional period (unless during such period they elect otherwise).

The British Virgin Islands is not a member of the European Union and not within the European Union fiscal territory, but the government of the United Kingdom had requested the Government of the British Virgin Islands to voluntarily apply the provisions of the EU Savings Tax Directive. In July 2011 the Government of the British Virgin Islands published The Mutual Legal Assistance (Tax Matters) (Automatic Exchange Information) Order, which changes the way in which the British Virgin Islands complies with the Directive. Pursuant to the Order the British Virgin Islands transitioned to the group of countries and territories that comply with the Directive through the automatic exchange of information on savings income with tax authorities in European Union Member States. The Order provides that as of January 1, 2012, British Virgin Islands’ based paying agents are no longer subject to, or able to rely on, the withholding tax option as a way of complying with the Directive. As such, British Virgin Islands’ institutions will now be obliged to disclose certain information to the British Virgin Islands International Tax Authority who will in turn comply with the information exchange policy under the Directive. This order will be most relevant to individuals who are resident of an European Union Member State and who maintain savings accounts with banks in the British Virgin Islands.Stamp Duty

 

No stamp duty is payable in the British Virgin Islands in respect of instruments relating to transactions involving a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands.

106 

 

Compliance with Automatic Exchange of Information Legislation

 

US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)

 

The Government of the British Virgin Islands has entered into a Model 1 intergovernmental agreement with the United States (the US IGA) and implemented certain domestic regulations (the AEOI Legislation) to facilitate compliance with FATCA.  To comply with our obligations under the AEOI Legislation, if we are a “Foreign Financial Institution” within the meaning of the US IGA and the AEOI Legislation, we may be required to report FATCA information to the British Virgin Islands International Tax Authority (the BVI ITA) which in turn will report relevant information to the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS). We do not believe we are classified as a Foreign Financial Institution within the meaning of the US IGA and the AEOI Legislation.  However, if we were to determine that our classification has changed, we may request additional information from any Shareholder and its beneficial owners (that may be disclosed to the BVI ITA and the IRS) to identify whether Participating Shares are held directly or indirectly by “Specified US Persons” (as defined in the US IGA). 

102

 

UK Requirements regarding Tax Reporting

 

The Government of the British Virgin Islands has also signed an intergovernmental agreement with the United Kingdom (the UK IGA) in a broadly similar form to the US IGA.  The UK IGA and the Mutual Legal Assistance (Tax Matters) (No.2) Order, 2015 impose similar requirements to the US IGA, so that we may be required to identify Participating Shares held directly or indirectly by “Specified United Kingdom Persons” (as defined in the UK IGA) and report information on such Specified United Kingdom Persons to the BVI ITA.  The BVI ITA will then exchange such information annually with HM Revenue & Customs, the United Kingdom tax authority.

 

OECD Common Reporting Standard Requirements regarding Tax Reporting

 

The OECD has adopted a “Common Reporting Standard” (CRS), which is intended to become an international standard for financial account reporting.  The Government of the British Virgin Islands is a signatory to the multi-lateral competent authority agreement (MCAA) that will be adopted by all jurisdictions committing to the CRS (each a Reportable Jurisdiction). Other governments that have signed up to the CRS and the MCAA will implement local legislation and it is expected that thelegislation. The first exchanges of information under this regime will beginoccurred in 2017. Under the Mutual Legal Assistance (Tax Matters) (Amendment) (No.2) Act, 2015, which implements the MCAA in the British Virgin Islands (the CRS Amendment Act) we will beare required to make an annual filing in respect of Shareholders who are resident in a Reportable Jurisdiction and who are not covered by one of the exemptions in the CRS Amendment Act. The MCAA and reporting obligations under the CRS Amendment Act are very similar to the UK IGA and are expected to replace the UK IGA.IGA and are expected to replace the UK IGA in 2018. A list of Reportable Jurisdictions has been published by the BVI ITA.

 

U. S. Federal Income Taxation

 

The following discussion describes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. HoldersHolder (as defined below), under current law, of an investment in theour ADSs or shares. This discussion applies only to U.S. Holders that hold the ADSs or shares as capital assets (generally, property held for investment) and that have the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. This discussion is based on the federal income tax laws of the United States in effect as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, including the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, existing and onproposed U.S. Treasury regulations in effectpromulgated thereunder, judicial authority, published administrative positions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or in some cases, proposedIRS, and other applicable authorities, all as of the date of this annual report as well as judicial and administrative interpretations thereof available on or before such date.Form 20-F. All of the foregoing authorities are subject to change, which change could apply retroactively and could significantly affect the tax consequences described below. We have not sought any ruling from the IRS with respect to the statements made and the conclusions reached in the following discussion and there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court will agree with our statements and conclusions.

 

This discussion applies only to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) that holds ADSs or shares as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, property held for investment). The following discussion does not address the tax consequences to any particular investor or describe all of the tax consequences applicable to persons in special tax situations such as:

 

·banks and certain other financial institutions;

 

·insurance companies;

 

·regulated investment companies;

·real estate investment trusts;

 

·broker-dealers;broker or dealers in stocks and securities, or currencies;

 

·traders that electpersons who use or are required to use a mark-to-market method of accounting;

 

·U.S. expatriatescertain former citizens or residents of the United States subject to Section 877 of the Code;

·entities covered bysubject to the U.S. anti-inversion rules;

 

·tax-exempt organizations and entities;

 

·persons liable forsubject to the alternative minimum tax;tax provisions of the Code;

·persons whose functional currency is other than the United States dollar;

 

·persons holding ADSs or shares as part of a straddle, hedging, conversion or integrated transaction;

 

103

·persons holding ADSs or shares through a bank, financial institution or other entity, or a branch thereof, located, organized or resident outside the United States,

 

·persons that actually or constructively own ADSs or shares representing 10% or more of the total combinedour voting power of all classes of our voting stock;or value;

 

·persons who acquired ADSs or shares pursuant to the exercise of anyan employee sharestock option or otherwise as compensation; or

 

·partnerships or other pass-through entities, or persons holding ADSs or shares through such entities.entities;

·persons required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect to our ADSs or shares as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement; or

·persons that held, directly, indirectly or by attribution, ADSs or shares or other ownership interests in us prior to our initial public offering.

 

In addition, the discussion below does not describe any tax consequences arising out of the Medicare tax on certain “net investment income” or any tax consequences arising out of the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act,” or FATCA regime.

 

INVESTORS

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR CAREFUL TAX PLANNING AND ADVICE. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDINGWITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX RULESLAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCESSITUATIONS, AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING UNDER THE FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS OR THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, OR NON-U.S. AND OTHERTAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ADSs OR SHARES.TREATY.

 

TheFor purposes of the discussion below, of the U.S. federal income tax consequences toa “U.S. Holders” will apply to you if you areHolder” is a beneficial owner of our ADSs or shares and you are,that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

·an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

 

·a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any State thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

·an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

·a trust, that (1) is subject to the primary supervision ofif (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over its administration and the control of one or more U.S. persons forhave the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (2) has(ii) in the case of a trust that was treated as a domestic trust under the law in effect before 1997, a valid election is in effectplace under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treatedtreat such trust as a U.S. person.domestic trust.

 

If a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of our ADSs or shares, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will depend on the status of such partner and the activities of such partnership. If you are such a partner or partnership, you should consult your tax advisors regarding the tax consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the ADSs or shares.

 

The discussion below assumes that the representations contained in the deposit agreement are true and that the obligations in the deposit agreement and any related agreement have been and will be complied with in accordance with their terms.

ADSs

If you beneficially own ADSs, you should be treated as the beneficial owner of the underlying shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes.Accordingly, deposits or withdrawals of shares for ADSs should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.


The U.S. Treasury hasDepartment and the IRS have expressed concerns that U.S. holders of ADSsAmerican depositary shares may be claiming foreign tax credits in situations where an intermediary in the chain of ownership between the holder of an ADSAmerican depositary share and the issuer of the security underlying the ADSAmerican depositary share has taken actions that are inconsistent with the ownership of the underlying security by the person claiming the credit. Such actions (for example, a pre-release of an ADSAmerican depositary share by a depositary) also may also be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced rate of tax applicable to certain dividends received by certain non-corporate U.S. holders of ADSs, including individual U.S. holders (discussed below).holders. Accordingly, the availability of foreign tax credits or the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individual U.S. Holders,each discussed below, could be affected by actions taken by intermediaries in the U.S. Treasury orchain of ownership betweenbetween the depositary.holder of an ADS and our company.

104

 

Taxation of dividends and other distributions on the ADSs or shares

 

Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed below, the gross amount of any distributions we make to you with respect to the ADSs or shares (including the amount of any taxes withheld therefrom) generally will be includible in your gross income as dividend income on the date of receipt by the depositary, in the case of ADSs, or by you, in the case of shares, but only to the extent that the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). To the extent that the amount of the distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles), such excess amount will be treated first as a tax-free return of your tax basis in your ADSs or shares, and then, to the extent such excess amount exceeds your tax basis, as capital gain. We currently do not, and we do not intend to, calculate our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, a U.S. Holder should expect that a distribution will be reported as a dividend even if that distribution would otherwise be treated as a non-taxable return of capital or as capital gain under the rules described above. Any dividends we pay will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations.

 

With

Dividends received by a non-corporate U.S. Holder may qualify for the lower rates of tax applicable to “qualified dividend income,” if the dividends are paid by a “qualified foreign corporation” and other conditions discussed below are met. A non-U.S. corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation (a) with respect to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individual U.S. Holders, dividends may be taxed at the lower capital gains rate applicable to qualified dividend income, providedpaid by that (1) our ADSs orcorporation on shares (or American depositary shares backed by such shares) that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States or we are(b) if such non-U.S. corporation is eligible for the benefits of a qualifying income tax treaty with the United States that includes an exchange of information program, (2) we are neitherprogram. However, a PFIC nornon-United States corporation will not be treated as such with respect to you for oura qualified foreign corporation if it is a passive foreign investment company in the taxable year in which the dividend is paid andor the preceding taxable year, and (3) certain holding period and other requirements are met. year.

Under U.S. Internal Revenue Service authority,a published IRS Notice, common or ordinary shares, or ADSsAmerican depositary shares representing such shares, are considered for purposes of clause (1) above to be readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States if they are listed on the NYSE, as are our ADSs (but not our shares). If are. Based on existing guidance, it is unclear whether the shares will be considered to be readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, because only the ADSs, and not the underlying shares, are listed on a securities market in the United States. We believe, but we cannot assure you, that dividends we pay on the shares that are represented by ADSs, but not on the shares that are not so represented, will, subject to applicable limitations, be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation. In addition, if we are treated as a PRC “resident enterprise” forresident enterprise under the PRC tax purposeslaw (see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Expiration of, or changes to, current PRC tax incentives that our business enjoys could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations”), then we may be eligible for the benefits of the income tax treaty between the United States and the PRC. If we are eligible for such benefits, then dividends that we pay on our shares, regardless of whether such shares are represented by ADSs, would, subject to applicable limitations, be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation.

Even if dividends would be treated as paid by a qualified foreign corporation, a non-corporate U.S. Holder will not be eligible for reduced rates of taxation if it does not hold our ADSs or shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date or if the U.S. Holder elects to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends of a qualified foreign corporation if the non-corporate U.S. Holder receiving the dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property.

You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the availability of the lower ratetax rates applicable to qualified dividend income for any dividends paidthat we pay with respect to the ADSs or shares.shares, as well as the effect of any change in applicable law after the date of this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

For foreign tax credit purposes, the limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, any dividends we pay with respect to our ADSs or shares generally will constitute “passive category income” but could, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, constitute “general category income.” Any dividends we pay generally will constitute foreign source income for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. If the dividends are taxed as qualified dividend income (as discussed above), the amount of the dividend taken into account for purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit limitation will be limited to the gross amount of the dividend, multiplied by the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income and divided by the highest tax rate normally applicable to dividends. If PRC withholding taxes apply to dividends paid to you with respect to the ADSs or shares (see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Under the Enterprise Income Tax Law, dividends payable by us and gains on the disposition of our shares or ADSs could be subject to PRC taxation”), subject to certain conditions and limitations, such PRC withholding taxes may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability. The rules relating to the determination of the federal tax credit are complex and you should consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of a foreign tax credit in your particular circumstances.


Taxation of dispositions of ADSs or shares

 

Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed below, you

You will recognize taxable gain or loss on anya sale or exchange of the ADSs or other taxable disposition ofshares in an ADS or shareamount equal to the difference between the amount realized (in U.S. dollars) for the ADSADSs or shareshares on the sale or exchange and your tax basis (in U.S. dollars) in the ADSADSs or share. Theshares. Subject to the discussion under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company” below, such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss. If you areCapital gains of a non-corporate U.S. Holder, including an individual U.S. Holder, whothat has held the ADS or share for more than one year, you may becurrently are eligible for reduced tax rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

 

105

Any gain or loss that you recognize on a disposition of ourthe ADSs or shares generally will be treated as U.S. sourceU.S.-source income or loss for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. However, if we are treated as a PRC “resident enterprise”resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes we may be eligible for the benefits of the incomeand PRC tax treaty between the United States and the PRC. In such event, if PRC taxes were to beis imposed on any gain from the disposition of the ADSs or shares (see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Under the Enterprise Income Tax Law, dividends payable by us and gains on the disposition of our shares or ADSs could be subject to PRC taxation”), then a U.S. Holder that is eligible for the benefits of the income tax treaty between the United States and the PRC may elect to treat the gain as PRC source income.PRC-source income for foreign tax credit purposes. If such an election is made, the gain so treated will be treated as a separate class or “basket” of income for foreign tax credit purposes. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the proper treatment of gain or loss, as well as the availability of a foreign tax credit, in your particular circumstances.

 

Passive foreign investment company

 

Based on the market price of our ADSs, the value of our assets, and the composition of our income and assets, we do not believe we were a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our taxable year ended December 31, 2015.2017. However, the application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects,respects. The determination of PFIC status involves extensive factual investigation, including ascertaining the fair market value of all of our assets on a quarterly basis and the character of each item of income that we earn. In particular, the application of the PFIC rules to certain of our business lines is complex and unclear, and we cannot assure you that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, will agree with any positions that we ultimately take. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will not take a contrary position. A non-U.S. corporation will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year or that the IRS will not take a contrary position.

A non-U.S. corporation will be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if, applying certainapplicable look-through rules, either:

 

·at least 75% of its gross income for such year is passive income,income; or

 

·at least 50% of the value of its assets (based(determined based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income (the “asset test”).income.

 

For this purpose, wepassive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents (other than certain royalties and rents derived in the active conduct of a trade or business and not derived from a related person) and net gains from transactions involving commodities (other than certain hedging transactions and certain active business gains). We will be treated as owning our proportionate share of the assets and earning oura proportionate share of the income of any other corporation in which we own, directly or indirectly, more than 25% (by value) of the stock. If the percentage of our assets treated as producing passive income increases, we may become a PFIC for the current or one or more future taxable years.

 

We must make a separate determination after the close of each taxable year as to whether we were a PFIC for that year. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will not be a PFIC for our current taxable year ending December 31, 20162018, or any future taxable year. Because the value of our assets for purposes of the asset test generally will be determined by reference to the market price of our ADSs or shares, fluctuations in the market price of the ADSs or shares may cause us to become a PFIC. In addition, changes in the composition of our income or assets may cause us to become a PFIC.

 

If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold our ADSs or shares, we will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to you for all succeeding years during which you hold the ADSs or shares, unless we cease to be a PFIC and you make a “deemed sale” election with respect to the ADSs or shares, as applicable. If such election is made, you will be deemed to have sold the ADSs or shares you hold at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year for which we were a PFIC and any gain from such deemed sale would be subject to the consequencesrules described in the following paragraph.two paragraphs. After the deemed sale election, yourso long as we do not become a PFIC in a subsequent taxable year, the ADSs or shares with respect to which such election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC unlessand, as a result, you will not be subject to the rules described below with respect to any “excess distribution” you receive from us or any gain from an actual sale or other disposition of the ADSs or shares. You are strongly urged to consult your tax advisors as to the possibility and consequences of making a deemed sale election if we subsequently becomeare and then cease to be a PFIC.PFIC and such an election becomes available to you.

 

For each taxable year that we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you, you will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution” you receive and any gain you recognize from a sale or other disposition (including a pledge) of the ADSs or shares, unless you make a “mark-to-market” election as discussed below. DistributionsFor this purpose, distributions that you receive in a taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions that you received during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or your holding period for the ADSs or shares will be treated as an excess distribution. Under these special tax rules:


·the excess distribution or recognized gain will be allocated ratably over your holding period for the ADSs or shares;

 

·the amount of the excess distribution or recognized gain allocated to the current taxable year of distribution or gain, and to any taxable years in your holding period prior to the first taxable year in which we were treated as a PFIC, will be treated as ordinary income; and

 

·the amount of the excess distribution or recognized gain allocated to each other taxable year will be subject to the highest tax rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as applicable, for each such year and the resulting tax will be subject to the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting tax attributable to each such year.tax.

106

 

The tax liability for amounts allocated to years prior to the year of disposition or excess distribution cannot be offset by any net operating losses for such years, and gains (but not losses) from a sale or other disposition of the ADSs or shares cannot be treated as capital gains, even if you hold the ADSs or shares as capital assets.

 

If we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you for any taxable year, to the extent any of our subsidiaries are also PFICs, you may be deemed to own shares in such lower-tier PFICs that are directly or indirectly owned by us in that proportion that the value of the ADSs or shares you own bears to the value of all our ADSs and shares, and you may be subject to the rules in the preceding paragraphs with respect to the shares of the lower-tier PFICs that you would be deemed to own. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to any of our subsidiaries.

 

A U.S. Holder of “marketable stock” (as defined below) of a PFIC may make a mark-to-market election for such stock to elect out of the PFIC rules described above regarding excess distributions and recognized gains. If you make a mark-to-market election for the ADSs or shares, you will include in gross income for each year that we are a PFIC an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the ADSs or shares you hold as of the close of your taxable year over your adjusted basis in such ADSs or shares. You will be allowed a deduction for the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of the ADSs or shares over their fair market value as of the close of the taxable year. However, deductions will be allowable only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains on the ADSs or shares included in your income for prior taxable years. Amounts included in your income under a mark-to-market election, as well as any gain from the actual sale or other disposition of the ADSs or shares, will be treated as ordinary income. If you make a valid mark-to-market election, any distribution that we make generally would be subject to the tax rules discussed above under “—Taxation of dividends and other distributions on the ADSs or shares,” except that the lower capital gains rate applicable to qualified dividend income generally would not apply.

 

The mark-to-market election is available only for “marketable stock,” which is stock that is traded in greater thande minimis quantities on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter (“regularly traded”) on a qualified exchange or other market, as defined in applicable U.S. Treasury regulations. Our ADSs, but not our shares, are listed on the NYSE, which is a qualified exchange or other market for these purposes. Consequently, ifas long as the ADSs continue to be listed on the NYSE and are regularly traded, and you are a holder of the ADSs, we expect that the mark-to-market election would be available to you if we become a PFIC.PFIC, but no assurances are given in this regard.

 

Alternatively,Because a mark-to-market election cannot be made for any lower-tier PFICs that we may own, if we were a PFIC for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder of stock ofthat makes the mark-to-market election may continue to be subject to the tax and interest charges under the general PFIC rules with respect to such U.S. Holder's indirect interest in any investments held by us that are treated as an equity interest in a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

In certain circumstances, a shareholder in a PFIC may makeavoid the adverse tax and interest-charge regime described above by making a “qualified electing fund” election with respect to such corporation to elect outinclude in income its share of the PFIC rules described above regarding excess distributions and recognized gains. A U.S. Holder that makescorporation’s income on a validcurrent basis. However, you may make a qualified electing fund election with respect to your ADSs or shares only if we agree to furnish you annually with a PFIC generally will includeannual information statement asspecified in gross income for a taxable year such holder’spro rata share of the corporation’s earnings and profits for the taxable year. However, the qualified electing fund election is available only if the PFIC provides such U.S. Holder with certain tax information as required under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations. We currently do not intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable you to make a qualified electing fund election.

 

A U.S. Holder that holds the ADSs or shares in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC will be required to file an annual report containing such information as the U.S. Treasury Department may require. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to your investment in our ADSs or shares and the availability, application and consequences of the elections discussed above.


Information reporting and backup withholding

 

Dividend payments withInformation reporting and backup withholding generally will apply to dividends in respect toof our ADSs or shares, and the proceeds from the sale or exchange or other disposition of our ADSs or shares, may be subjectthat are paid to information reporting toyou within the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and possible U.S. backup withholding at a rate of 28%. Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a U.S. Holder that furnishesUnited States (and in certain cases, outside the United States), unless you furnish a correct taxpayer identification number and makesmake any other required certification, generally on U.S. Internal Revenue ServiceIRS Form W-9 or that isyou otherwise exemptestablish an exemption from backup withholding. U.S. Holders that are required to establish their exempt status generally must provide such certification on U.S. Internal Revenue Service Form W-9.

 

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be creditedgenerally are allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, and you may be entitled to obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing theif you file an appropriate claim for refund with the U.S. Internal Revenue ServiceIRS and furnishingfurnish any required information in a timely manner.

 

Additionally, certain

107

U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the U.S. information reporting and backup withholding rules.

Information with respect to foreign financial assets

U.S. Holders who are individuals (and certain entities closely held by individuals) generally arewill be required to report our name, address and such information relating to an interest in the ADSs or shares as is necessary to identify the class or issue of which your ADSs or shares are a part. These requirements are subject to exceptions, including an exception for ADSs or shares held in accounts maintained by certain financial institutions and an exception applicable if the aggregate value of all “specified foreign financial assets” (as defined in the Code) does not exceed certain thresholds.$50,000.

 

U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the U.S.these information reporting and backup withholding rules.

 

F.Dividends and Paying Agents

 

Not applicable.

 

G.Statement by Experts

 

Not applicable.

 

H.Documents on Display

 

We previously filed with the SEC registration statements on Form F-1 (File Numbers 333-148550 and 333-151315) and Form F-3 (File Numbers 333-189650 and 333-197388) and prospectus and prospectus supplements under the Securities Act with respect to the shares represented by the ADSs, preferred shares and warrants.ADSs. We also filed with the SEC related registration statements on Form F-6 (File Numbers 333-148559 and 333-162257) with respect to the ADSs. We also filed with the SEC registration statements on Form S-8 (File Numbers 333-153647 and 333-175479) with respect to our securities to be issued under our 2007 share incentive plan.

 

We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act as applicable to foreign private issuers. Under the Exchange Act, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually a Form 20-F: within four months after the end of each fiscal year for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2011. Copies of reports and other information, when so filed with the SEC, can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. The public may obtain information regarding the Washington, D.C. Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a web site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC using its EDGAR system. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules of the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.


We will furnish The Bank of New York Mellon, the depositary of our ADSs, with our annual reports, which will include a review of operations and annual audited consolidated financial statements prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, and all notices of shareholders’ meetings and other reports and communications that are made generally available to our shareholders. The depositary will make such notices, reports and communications available to holders of ADSs and, upon our request, will mail to all record holders of ADSs the information contained in any notice of a shareholders’ meeting received by the depositary from us.

 

I.Subsidiary Information

 

For a list of our subsidiaries as of the date of this annual report, see Exhibit 8.1 appended hereto.

 

108

ITEM 11.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Inflation

 

Since our inception, inflation in China has not materially impacted our results of operations. According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, inflation as measured by the consumer price index in China was 2.6%1.4%, 2.0%2.1% and 1.4%1.6% in 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

Foreign Exchange Risk

 

Our sales in China are denominated in Renminbi, and our exportinternational sales are generally denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros, British pounds and other local currencies. Our costs and capital expenditures are largely denominated in Renminbi and foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars Euro and Japanese Yen.Euros. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates particularly between the U.S. dollar and Renminbi and between the Euro and Renminbi, could have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations, affect our gross and operating profit margins, and result in foreign exchange and operating gains or losses. For example, as of December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, we held $125.7$0.1 million and $161.2$23.3 million, respectively, in accounts receivable, including notes receivable, some of which were denominated in U.S. dollars. Had we converted all of our accounts receivable.receivable, including notes receivable, as of either date into Renminbi at an exchange rate of RMB6.4778RMB6.5063 for $1.00, the exchange rate as of December 31, 2015,2017, our accounts receivable would have been RMB814.3RMB0.6 million and RMB1,044.2RMB151.6 million as of December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

Assuming that Renminbi depreciates by a rate of 10% to an exchange rate of RMB7.2292, we would record a gain in the fair value of our accounts receivable in Renminbi terms. A 10% depreciation of Renminbi would result in our holding Renminbi equivalents of RMB0.7 million and RMB168.4 million in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. These amounts would therefore reflect a theoretical gain of RMB0.1 million and RMB16.8 million for our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively.

Assuming that Renminbi appreciates by a rate of 10% to an exchange rate of RMB5.8889,RMB5.9148, we would record a loss in the fair value of our accounts receivable in Renminbi terms. A 10% appreciation of Renminbi would result in our holding Renminbi equivalents of RMB740.2RMB0.6 million and RMB949.3RMB137.8 million in accounts receivable as of December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, respectively. These amounts would therefore reflect a theoretical loss of RMB74.1RMB0 million and RMB94.9RMB13.8 million for our accounts receivable as of December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

This calculation model is based on multiplying our accounts receivable, which are held in U.S. dollars, by a smaller Renminbi equivalent amount resulting from an appreciation of Renminbi. This calculation model does not take into account optionality nor does it take into account the use of financial instruments.

 

We incurred foreign currency exchange losses of approximately $0.4$1.2 million, exchange losses of approximately $27.0$1.1 million and exchange lossesgains of approximately $2.1$0.9 million in 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively. Our risk management strategy includes the use of derivative and non-derivative financial instruments as hedges of foreign currency exchange risk, whenever management determines their use to be reasonable and practical. This strategy does not permit the use of derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it allow for speculation. The purpose of our foreign currency derivative activities is to protect us from the risk that the U.S. dollar net cash flows resulting from forecasted foreign currency-denominated transactions will be negatively affected by changes in exchange rates. We use foreign currency forward exchange contracts to offset changes in the amount of future cash flows associated with certain third-party sales expected to occur within the next two years. Gains or losses on those contracts are recognized in other income in the consolidated income statements. The recognition of gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivative instruments is based on the use of each derivative instrument. We had net gains of $0.6 million, net gains of $6.1 million and net losses of $6.0 million on derivative instruments from foreign currency forward exchange contracts in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Our exposure to interest rate risk relates to interest expenses incurred by our short-term, long-term borrowings, and interest income generated by excess cash invested in demand deposits with original maturities of three months or less. We have not used any derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk exposure due to lack of such financial instruments in China. Historically, we have not been exposed to material risks due to changes in interest rates; however, our future interest income may decrease or interest expenses on our borrowings may increase due to changes in market interest rates. We are currently not engaged in any interest rate hedging activities.


109

An increase of 100 basis point in interest rates at the reporting dates indicated below would have increased our loss for the year and decreased our equity by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.

 

  As of December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
  (in thousands) 
100 basis point increase in loss and decrease in equity $8,542  $7,848  $7,337 
  As of December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
  (in thousands) 
100 basis point            
increase in loss and decrease in equity $304  $271  $679 

 

A 100 basis point decrease would have had the equal but opposite effect to the amounts shown above, assuming all other variables remain constant.

 

ITEM 12.DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

 

A.Debt Securities

 

Not applicable.

 

B.Warrants and Rights

 

Not applicable.

 

C.Other Securities

 

Not applicable.

 

D.American Depositary Shares

 

Fees and Charges Our ADS Holders May Have to Pay

 

Our American depositary shares, each of which represents two10 shares, are listed on the NYSE. The Bank of New York Mellon is the depositary of our ADS program and its principal executive office is situated at One Wall Street, New York, New York 10286.program. The depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions, or by directly billing investors, or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid. The depositary may use affiliated brokers or other agents in performing services, and such agents may earn or share fees, spreads or commissions relating hereto.

 

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares
or holders of ADSs must pay:
 For:
 
$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) 

·     Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property

·     Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

   
$.02 (or less) per ADS ·     Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders


110

 

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares
or holders of ADSs must pay:
 For:
 
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs ·     Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities that are distributed by the depositary to ADS registered holders
   
$.02 (or less) per ADSs per calendar year ·     Depositary services
   
Registration or transfer fees ·     Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares
   
Expenses of the depositary 

·     Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expresslyas provided in the deposit agreement)agreement

 

·     Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars

   
Taxes and other governmental charges payable by the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes ·     As necessary
   
Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities ·     As necessary

 

Fees and Other Payments Made by the Depositary to Us

 

The depositary has agreed to reimbursemake certain annual payments to us for reimbursement of expenses we incur that are related to the administration and maintenance of our ADS facility including, but not limited to, investor relations expenses, the annual NYSE listing fees, ADS offering expenses or any other program related expenses. There are limits on the amount of expenses for whichpayments and reimbursements from the depositary will reimburse us, but the amount of reimbursement available to us is not related to the amounts of fees the depositary collects from investors.depositary. The annual reimbursement is also conditioned on certain requirements and criteria and will be adjusted proportionately to the extent such requirements or criteria are not met. For 2015,the year ended December 31, 2017, we received nil from the depositary in respect of such reimbursement. The depositary has also agreed to waive certain fees and expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the depositary waived a total of $55,072.3$ $55,010.08 for the standard costsfees and expenses associated with the maintenance and administration of the ADR program.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 13.DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

 

None.

 

ITEM 14.MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

A.—D. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders

 

See “Item 10. Additional Information” for a description of the rights of shareholders, which remain unchanged except for the changes disclosed below.

111

 

In August 2011, our board of directors adopted a shareholder rights plan to protect the best interests of ReneSola and our shareholders and authorized the dividend distribution. One share purchase right was distributed on August 26, 2011, with respect to each share of ReneSola outstanding at the close of business on such date. Initially, the share purchase rights were evidenced by the certificates representing outstanding shares, and no separate share purchase right certificates were distributed. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the share purchase rights will be exercisable at $20.0 per share purchase right if a person or group acquires 15% or more of ReneSola’s voting securities or announces a tender offer for 15% or more of the voting securities, subject to adjustment. Our board of directors will be entitled to redeem the share purchase rights at $0.0001 per share purchase right at any time before a person or group has acquired 15% or more of ReneSola’s voting securities. The share purchase rights are designed to ensure that our shareholders receive fair treatment in the event of any proposed takeover of our company and to encourage anyone seeking to acquire our company to negotiate with our board of directors prior to attempting a takeover. The share purchase rights were not distributed in response to any specific effort to acquire control of our company.


E. Use of Proceeds

 

Application of all the offering proceeds from our completed initial public offering on February 1, 2008, follow-on public offering on June 18, 2008 and follow-on public offering on October 5, 2009 was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 8, 2011.Not applicable.

 

In addition, application of all the offering proceeds from our completed registered direct offering of 15,000,000 ADSs on September 17, 2013 was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 25, 2014.

ITEM 15.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and our interim chief financial officer, has performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act.

 

Based upon that evaluation, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2015,2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveineffective because of the material weakness described below under “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” We will undertake the remedial steps to address the material weakness in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submitour disclosure controls and procedures as set forth below under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.“Management’s Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses.”

112

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such itemterm is defined in RulesRule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, for our company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that (i)(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of a company’s assets, (ii)(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that a company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of a company’s management and directors, and (iii)(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of a company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to consolidated financial statement preparation and presentation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

As required by Section 404In making its assessment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules as promulgated by the SEC,internal control over financial reporting, our management assessed the effectiveness of ourthe internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152017 using criteria established in “Internal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


Based

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on this assessment,a timely basis.

As a result of our management’s evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting, a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting was identified as of December 31, 2017, which was that we lacked sufficient accounting and financial reporting personnel with appropriate knowledge of U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements to formalize and carry out key controls over the financial reporting process andto properly address complex accounting issues and toprepare and review consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting requirements.

The material weakness described above may result in a material misstatement to our quarterly or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. As a result of the material weakness, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effectiveineffective as of December 31, 2015,2017, based on the criteria established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP,This annual report on Form 20-F does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm who audited our consolidated financial statements forbecause the year ended December 31, 2015, has also auditedCompany is neither an accelerated filer nor a large accelerated filer, as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. As a non-accelerated filer, we are not required to provide an attestation on the effectiveness of our internal control by our independent registered public accounting firm under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the requirements of the SEC promulgated thereunder.

Management’s Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses

Our management has been engaged in, and continues to be engaged in, making necessary changes and improvements to our internal control system to address the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015described above. In particular, we have taken actions to and issued an attestation report on management’s assessment ofwill continue to (1) hire people who has adequate U.S. GAAP knowledge and reallocate our internal control overaccounting staff resources to fulfil the financial reporting.

Attestation Reportreporting process requirements at both headquarter and the location levels after our restructuring to dispose of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tomanufacturing and LED distribution businesses,; (2) provide more comprehensive training on U.S. GAAP to our accounting team and other relevant personnel; and (3) enhance our accounting manual and reporting packages to provide our accounting team with more comprehensive guidelines on the Board of Directorspolicies and Shareholders of ReneSola Ltd

We have audited the internal controlcontrols over financial reporting of ReneSola Ltdunder U.S. GAAP and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reportingSEC rules and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.requirements.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

113

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and the related financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 of the Company and our report dated April 28, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.


/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP

Shanghai, China

April 28, 2016

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management has evaluated with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, whether any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal year have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Based on the evaluation we conducted, our management has concluded that, other than the material weakness as disclosed above, no such changes occurred during the period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

On October 27, 2015, we announced Mr. Daniel K. Lee’s resignation as our chief financial officer, effective November 25, 2015, and Ms. Yuanyuan (Maggie) Ma, our then vice president of financial control, served as our interim chief financial officer since Mr. Lee’s resignation.  Ms. Yuanyuan (Maggie) Ma became our official chief financial officer, effective April 1, 2016.  We have performed an updated annual risk assessment in this regard, observed and tested the chief financial officer transition process, and analyzed the restructure of finance department and its impact. We have also updated Entity Level Controls  under the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to ensure the functioning of the restructured finance department, reporting lines, appropriate authorities and responsibilities being under the board oversight.  Our analysis does not change our conclusion in the paragraph above.

ITEM 16A.AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

 

Our board of directors has determined that Tan Wee Seng, an independent director, is our audit committee financial expert. Mr. Tan satisfies the independent requirements of Section 303A of the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

 

ITEM 16B.CODE OF ETHICS

 

Our board of directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers, employees and agents, including certain provisions that specifically apply to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller, chief operating officer, chief technology officer, vice presidents and any other persons who perform similar functions for us. We have posted a copy of our code of business conduct and ethics on our website at www.renesola.com.www.renesolapower.com. We hereby undertake to provide to any person without charge, a copy of our code of business conduct and ethics within ten working days after we receive such person’s written request.

 

ITEM 16C.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees by categories specified below in connection with certain professional services rendered by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP our independent registered public accounting firm, for the periods indicated.and PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP. We did not pay any other fees to our independent registered public accounting firm during the periods indicated below.

 

 For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 
 2013  2014  2015  2016  2017 
 (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
Audit fees(1) $1,464  $1,147  $937  $939  $959 
Audit-related fees(2)  26   28         69 
Tax fees(3)  19   78   64       
Other fees               


(1)“Audit fees” means the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firmfirms for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our comparative interim financial statements.

(2)“Audit related fees” represents aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for the assurance and related services rendered in connection with our filing of Form F-3.

(3)“Tax fees” represents value-added tax.

 

The policy of our audit committee is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services as described above, other than those forde minimusservices that are approved by the Audit Committee prior to the completion of the audit.

 

ITEM 16D.EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

 

Not applicable.

 

114

ITEM 16E.PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

In August 2011, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $100 million in aggregate value of its outstanding shares during a six-month period ended February 20, 2012 on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. We repurchased an aggregate of 645,424 ADSs, representing 1,290,848 shares, on the open market for a total cash consideration of $1.9 million in 2011, which were cancelled as of February 29, 2012. We did not repurchase any ADSs in 2012, 2013 or 2014.

 

In September 2015, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $20 million in aggregate value of our outstanding ADSs within 12 months ending September 2016 on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, or 2015transactions. In September 2016, our board decided to extend the share repurchase program. Asprogram for another 12 months ending September 2017. Upon the expiration of March 31, 2016,the share repurchase program in September 2017, we repurchased an aggregate of 1,310,577441,906 ADSs, representing 2,621,154approximately 4,419,060 shares, on the open market for a total cash consideration of $1.51$2.3 million. 1,614,776All of such repurchased shares werehave been canceled in November 2015, and the remaining are expected to be canceled in the second quarteras of 2016.December 31, 2017.

 

Other than those disclosed in this item, we did not repurchase our shares pursuant to non-publicly announced plans or programs.

 

The table below set forth the information for our repurchase of our shares for each month included in the period covered by the report:report (all ADS and per ADS data have been adjusted to give effect to the ADS Ratio Change):

 

Period 

Total
Number of
ADSs
Purchased(1)

  

Average Price
Paid per
ADS(2)

  Total Number of
ADSs Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Programs
  

Maximum Dollar
Value of ADSs that
may yet be Purchased
Under Programs(3)

 
September 2015  807,388  $0.98   807,388   19,212,038.40 
October 2015    $       
November 2015    $       
December 2015    $       
January 2016    $       
February 2016    $       
March 2016  503,189  $1.43   1,310,577   18,494,042.18 

Period 

Total

Number of

ADSs

Purchased

  

Average Price

Paid per

ADS(1)

  

Total Number of

ADSs Purchased as

Part of Publicly

Announced Programs

  

Maximum Dollar

Value of ADSs that

may yet be Purchased

Under the Program

 
September 2015  161,477  $4.90   161,477   19,212,038.40 
October 2015  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
November 2015  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
December 2015  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
January 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
February 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
March 2016  100,638   7.15   262,115   18,494,042.18 
April 2016  34,621   7.00   296,736   18,252,111.94 
May 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
June 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
July 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
August 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
September 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
October 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
November 2016  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
December 2016  145,170   3.40   441,906   17,760,805.77 
January 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
February 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
March 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
April 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
May 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
June 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
July 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
August 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 
September 2017  ¾   ¾   ¾   ¾ 

 

 

(1)Each ADS represents two shares.

 

(2)Excluding broker commission fees.

(1)       Excluding broker commission fees.

 

(3)Pursuant to our 2015 share repurchase program, excluding broker commission fees.

ITEM 16F.CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

 

Not applicable.Effective December 19, 2017, we dismissed Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm. Effective December 19, 2017, we engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The appointment of PwC was made after careful consideration and evaluation process by the Company and was approved by the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of the Company.

115

Deloitte’s reports on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, and subsequent interim period through December 19, 2017, we did not have any disagreements, as that term is defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F and the related instructions to Item 16F of Form 20-F, with Deloitte on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures that, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its audit reports on our consolidated financial statements for the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, and subsequent interim period through December 19, 2017, there were no reportable events (hereinafter defined) requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 16F (a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 and the subsequent interim period through December 19, 2017, neither we nor anyone on our behalf consulted PwC regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements, nor has PwC provided to us a written report or oral advice that PwC concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” with Deloitte as that term is defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F and the related instructions to Item 16F of Form 20-F, or a “reportable event,” as that term is described in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F.

We provided a copy of this disclosure to Deloitte and requested that Deloitte furnish us with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made above, and if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. A copy of Deloitte’s letter dated April 30, 2018 is attached herewith as Exhibit 4.8.

 

ITEM 16G.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Pursuant to certain exceptions for foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with certain of the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. However, pursuant to Section 303.A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and the requirements of Form 20-F, we are required to state any significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the practices required by the NYSE for U.S. companies.

 

Section 303A.08 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual requires a NYSE listed company to obtain its shareholders’ approval of all equity-compensation plans, and any material revisions to the terms of such plans. Section 303A.11303A.00 permits a foreign private issuer like our company to follow home country practice in certain corporate governance matters. Our British Virgin Islands counsel, Harney Westwood & Riegels LLP, has advised that under the existing British Virgin Islands laws, we are not required to obtain shareholders’ approval for amendments to our existing equity incentive plan. However, it should be noted that under the terms of the equity incentive plan, shareholder approval is required for certain changes to the terms of the plan. Upon board approval in January 2009 and August 2010, we effected amendments to our 2007 share incentive plan. On August 8, 2012,In July 2016, our board of directors approved an adjustment to the exercise priceamendment and restatement of options to purchase 5,386,600 shares previously granted under theour 2007 share incentive plan, to establish a new exercise price for such share options heldwhich was approved by current employees.our shareholders in our 2016 annual general meeting on August 29, 2016. We will continue to follow the British Virgin Islands practice.

Section 303A.04 and Section 303A.05 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual require a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. Since March 2018, one of our independent directors who were also a member of our compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee stepped down as our independent director but remained to be our director. As a result, majority of the members our compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee are independent directors. Section 303A.00 permits a foreign private issuer like our company to follow home country practice in certain corporate governance matters. Our British Virgin Islands counsel, Harney Westwood & Riegels LLP, has advised that under the existing British Virgin Islands laws, we are not required to have a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors.

116

 

Other than the home country practice described above, we are not aware of any significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. domestic companies under the NYSE listing rules.

 

ITEM 16H.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

 

Not applicable.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 17FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

We have elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 18.

 

ITEM 18FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The consolidated financial statements of ReneSola are included at the end of this annual report.

 

ITEM 19.EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit
Number 

 
Number

Description of Document

   
1.1 Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our pre-effective amendment No. 2 to Form F-3 registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2013)
   
2.1 Registrant’s Specimen American Depositary Receipt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 from our post-effective amendment No. 1 to Form F-6 registration statement (File No. 333-162257), as amended, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2011)
   
2.2 Registrant’s Specimen Certificate for Shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 from our Form F-1 registration statement  (File No. 333-151315) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2008)
   
2.3 Form of Deposit Agreement among the Registrant, the depositary and holder of the American Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 from our post-effective amendment No. 1 to the Form F-6 registration statement  (File No. 333-162257) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2011)
   
2.4 Rights Agreement dated as of August 22, 2011 between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K (File No. 001-33911) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 2011)

Exhibit
NumberDescription of Document
   
2.5 Standstill Agreement dated as of August 22, 2011 between the Registrant and Xianshou Li (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K (File No. 001-33911) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 2011)
   
4.1 2007 Share Incentive Plan, amended and restated as of August 20, 201029, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.110.1 of the post-effective amendment to our Annual Reportregistration statement on Form 20-FS-8 (File No. 333-153647) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2011)August 29, 2016)
   
4.2 Form of Indemnification Agreement with the Registrant’s Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 from our Form F-1 registration statement (File No. 333-151315) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2008)

117

Exhibit
Number 

Description of Document

   
4.34.3* Service Agreement among the Registrant, ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd. (formerly known as Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd.) and Xianshou Li dated as of May 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 from our Form F-1 registration statement (File No. 333-151315) filed with the Commission on May 30, 2008)
4.4English Translation of Supplemental Agreement to Service Agreement among the Registrant, ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd. (formerly known as Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd.), ReneSola Shanghai Ltd. and Xianshou Li dated as of August 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2015)
4.5English Translation of the Form of Employment Relationship Adjustment Agreement among  ReneSola ZhejiangShanghai Ltd., ReneSola ShanghaiConsulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and our executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2015)
   
4.64.4* English Translationtranslation of the Form of Employment Contract betweenService Agreement among ReneSola Shanghai Ltd. and its executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2015)
   
4.74.5* English Translation of the Form of Employment ContractService Agreement between ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd.Power Holdings, L.L.C and its executive officers(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2015)
   
4.84.6* English Translation of the Form of Employment ContractService Agreement between ReneSola Jiangsu Ltd.Engineering International GmbH and its executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2015)
   
4.94.7 Form of ServiceShare Purchase and Subscription Agreement, betweendated September 25, 2017, by and among the Registrant, Mr. Xianshou Li, ReneSola Deutschland GmbhSingapore Pte. Ltd. and its executive officersother parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2015)

Exhibit
NumberDescription of Document
4.10Form of Service Agreement between ReneSola America Inc. and its executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2015)
4.11English Translation of Guarantee Contract among China Construction Bank, Xiahe Lian and Xianshou Li date as of January 24, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 2009)
4.12English Translation of Supplemental Agreement to Guarantee Contract among China Construction Bank, Xiahe Lian and Xianshou Li date as of February 29, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.21 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2012)
4.13English Translation of Lease Agreement between Zhejiang Yuhuan and ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd. (formerly known as Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd.) dated January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2010)
4.14Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares represented by American Depositary Shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.199.2 of the Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K  (File No. 001-33911) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2013)25, 2017)
   
4.154.8 FormLetter dated April 30, 2018 from Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP regarding Item 16F of Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2013)this annual report
   
4.1611.1 Form of Placement Agent Agreement dated September 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2013)
8.1*Subsidiaries of the Registrant
11.1Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 from our Form F-1 registration statement (File No. 333-151315) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2008)
   
12.1* CEO Certification, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
12.2* CFO Certification, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
13.1** CEO Certification, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
13.2** CFO Certification, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
15.1* Consent of Harney Westwood & Riegels LLP
   
15.2*15.3* Consent of Haiwen & Partners
15.3*Consent of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP

Exhibit  
Number15.4* DescriptionConsent of DocumentPricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP
   
101* 

Financial information from the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 20142017 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL):

 

(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142016 and 2015;2017; (ii) Consolidated Income Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015;2017; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015;2017; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015;2017; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015;2017; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements; and (vii) Schedule I—ReneSola Ltd Condensed Financial Statements

 

 

*Filed with this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

**Furnished with this annual report on Form 20-F.

123 

118

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

 RENESOLA LTD
   
 By:/s/ Xianshou Li
 Name:Xianshou Li
 Title:Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: April 28, 201630, 2018

 

[Signature Page to 20-F]

 

 

 

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirmsF-2
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142016 and 20152017F-4
  
Consolidated Income Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017F-6
  
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017F-7
  
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017F-8
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017F-9
  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF-11
Schedule 1-ReneSola Ltd Condensed Financial StatementsF-38

  

F-1

F-1 

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of ReneSola Ltd

ReneSola Ltd:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of ReneSola Ltd and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP

Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China

April 30, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

F-2 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

ReneSola Ltd:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of ReneSola Ltd and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31 2014 and 2015,2016, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2015. Our audits also included2016 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statement schedule includedstatements present fairly, in Schedule I. all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As described in Note 2(a) to the financial statements, the accompanying financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 have been retrospectively adjusted for discontinued operations.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,/s/Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP

Shanghai, China

April 28, 2017 (and April 30, 2018 as to the financial position of ReneSola Ltd and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for eacheffects of the three yearsretrospective adjustment for the discontinued operations described in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.Note 2 (a))

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),served as the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 28, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.auditor from 2006 to 2016.

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
 
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
Shanghai, China
April 28, 2016F-3  

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

ReneSola Ltd:

 

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of ReneSola Ltd and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and the related financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 of the Company and our report dated April 28, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
Shanghai, China
April 28, 2016

RENESOLA LTD

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)dollars, except number of shares)

 

    As of December 31, 
 As of December 31,   Note  2016  2017 
 2014  2015        
ASSETS                    
Current assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $99,847,604  $38,045,225   2(f)  $3,964,896  $13,429,301 
Restricted cash  121,862,127   140,337,531 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $7,638,434 and $5,152,466 as of December 31,2014 and 2015, respectively  112,006,096   117,552,365 
Notes Receivable  13,737,075   43,613,485 
Inventories  357,361,169   193,171,119 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of nil as of December 31, 2016 and 2017  4   85,948   23,312,086 
Advances to suppliers-current, net  27,493,901   18,479,686   2(i)   4,220,864   379,792 
Amounts due from related parties  452,415   110,952 
Value added tax recoverable  30,514,426   24,525,347   2(r)   4,893,087   15,228,594 
Income tax recoverable  1,246,718   3,609,414       60,202   - 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  44,913,444   27,805,783   5   1,893,590   10,542,822 
Project assets  37,039,958   20,213,622 
Assets held-for-sale  -   4,240,878 
Derivative assets  1,688,103   56,253 
Deferred tax assets-current, net  11,368,201   5,988,646 
        
Project assets current  2(g), 6   48,177,416   76,556,400 
Deferred project costs current  2(g), 6   -   17,957,041 
Contract costs  2(h)   -   12,668,709 
Assets of discontinued operations current  3   444,198,018   - 
Total current assets  859,531,237   637,750,306       507,494,021   170,074,745 
                    
Property, plant and equipment, net  750,297,544   630,462,070   2(j), 7   20,158,589   154,659,077 
Prepaid land use right, net  39,574,063   37,239,795 
Deferred tax assets-non-current, net  8,461,905   10,237,718   9   147,546   59,298 
Advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment, net  1,756,051   381,958   2(i)   416,201   - 
Project assets non-current  2(g), 6   6,709,991   7,480,574 
Deferred project costs non-current  2(g), 6   16,374,899   - 
Other non-current assets  9,386,726   9,373,292   2(n)   3,250,754   3,425,098 
Deferred project costs  -   20,874,446 
        
Assets of discontinued operations non-current  3   533,853,687   - 
Total assets $1,669,007,526  $1,346,319,585      $1,088,405,688  $335,698,792 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-4 

RENESOLA LTD

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS-(Continued)

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)dollars, except number of shares)

 

 As of December 31,     As of December 31, 
 2014  2015   Note  2016  2017 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLERS' EQUITY        
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY            
Current liabilities:                    
Short-term borrowings $654,675,368  $668,787,546   10  $-  $6,605,894 
Convertible bond payable-current  -   26,145,000 
Accounts payable  461,499,180   300,176,417       -   25,787,686 
Advances from customers-current  84,411,639   28,101,183       504,653   236,607 
Amounts due to related parties  7,569,511   2,676,614   18   -   60,370,065 
Other current liabilities  126,623,253   77,238,265   11   8,349,955   30,514,235 
Income tax payable  123,492   129,845       93,473   330,132 
Derivative liabilities  -   29,519 
Warrant liability  1,890,000   577,500 
Salary payable      -   560,416 
Deferred project revenue current  2(s)  -   20,791,918 
Liabilities of discontinued operations current  3   895,484,040   - 
Total current liabilities  1,336,792,443   1,103,861,889       904,432,121   145,196,953 
                    
Convertible notes payable-non-current  94,599,000   - 
Long-term borrowings  43,451,827   38,776,693   10   28,835,700   32,513,900 
Advances from customers-non-current  936,063   - 
Warranty  31,778,365   36,023,946 
Deferred revenue  -   32,376,386 
Deferred subsidies  25,347,152   23,241,899 
Other long-term liabilities  946,357   104,860 
Deferred project revenue non-current  2(s)  32,242,995   - 
Failed sale-lease back and capital lease liabilities  10   -   67,505,469 
Liabilities of discontinued operations non-current  3   56,749,092   - 
Total liabilities  1,533,851,207   1,234,385,673      $1,022,259,908  $245,216,322 
            
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 19)                    
Shareholders' equity        
Common shares (500,000,000 shares; no par value shares authorized at December 31, 2014 and 2015; 204,846,064 shares issued and 203,777,464 shares outstanding at December 31, 2014; 203,331,288 shares issued and 203,205,688 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015)  476,765,888   477,964,702 
            
Shareholders’ equity            
Common shares (500,000,000 shares; no par value shares authorized at December 31, 2016 and 2017; 202,478,702 shares issued and 200,538,902 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016; 381,027,002 shares issued and 380,678,902 shares outstanding at December 31, 2017)      477,171,487   519,225,850 
Treasury stock (1,451,700 shares and nil on December 31, 2016 and 2017 respectively)  2(z)  (513,137)  - 
Additional paid-in capital  7,512,174   7,669,350       8,229,330   9,012,448 
Accumulated deficit  (430,201,775)  (435,276,897)      (469,975,148)  (435,517,610)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  81,080,032   61,576,757 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income  2(y)  51,233,248   (2,238,218)
            
Total equity  135,156,319   111,933,912       66,145,780   90,482,470 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $1,669,007,526  $1,346,319,585 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity     $1,088,405,688  $335,698,792 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-5 

RENESOLA LTD

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars, except number of shares and per share data)shares)

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Net revenues:            
Product sales $1,518,411,235  $1,552,893,052  $1,270,558,771 
Product sales – related party  3,140,734   2,898,698   53,538 
Processing services  1,223,637   8,603,976   11,472,675 
Total net revenues  1,519,634,872   1,561,497,028   1,282,031,446 
Cost of revenues:            
Product sales  1,405,819,889   1,346,151,113   1,086,790,937 
Product sales – related party  3,578,013   2,733,991   54,756 
Processing services  709,883   6,062,630   7,366,665 
Total cost of revenues  1,406,529,772   1,352,213,743   1,094,157,602 
Gross profit  113,105,100   209,283,285   187,873,844 
Operating expenses (income):            
Sales and marketing  75,594,663   93,067,159   72,294,911 
General and administrative  55,632,109   67,293,891   59,290,266 
Research and development  46,452,032   52,575,143   43,905,312 
Other operating income  (45,885,044)  (11,870,403)  (16,919,975)
Impairment of long-lived assets  202,756,739   -   - 
Total operating expenses  334,550,499   201,065,790   158,570,514 
Income (loss) from operations  (221,445,399)  8,217,495   29,303,330 
Non-operating expenses (income):            
Interest income  (8,443,153)  (5,009,687)  (2,875,075)
Interest expense  52,108,491   49,015,802   43,417,785 
Foreign exchange losses  367,936   27,009,411   2,136,980 
Losses (gains)on derivatives, net  (633,964)  (6,057,941)  6,030,915 
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries  -   (8,253,229)  - 
Gains on repurchase of convertible notes  -   (7,048,188)  (13,693,269)
Fair value change of warrant liability  (3,202,500)  (7,455,000)  (1,312,500)
Loss before income tax, non-controlling interests  (261,642,209)  (33,983,673)  (4,401,506)
Income tax benefit(expense)  2,722,715   349,880   (673,616)
Net loss  (258,919,494)  (33,633,793)  (5,075,122)
Less: net loss attributed to non-controlling interests  (3,955)  (3,772)  - 
Net loss attributed to ReneSola Ltd $(258,915,539) $(33,630,021) $(5,075,122)
Loss per share            
Basic $(1.42) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Diluted $(1.42) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Weighted average number of shares used in computing loss per share            
Basic  182,167,908   203,550,049   204,085,041 
Diluted  182,167,908   203,550,049   204,085,041 
     Year ended December 31, 
   Note  2015  2016  2017 
Continuing operations                
                 
 Net Revenue :                
Solar power project development  2(r), 20  $110,737,934  $77,372,737  $64,837,042 
Electricity revenue generation  2(r), 20   5,551,742   3,131,997   12,247,320 
EPC services  2(r), 20   -   -   25,853,288 
Other  2(r), 20   41,260   -   36,349 
Total net revenue      116,330,936   80,504,734   102,973,999 
 Cost of revenue  2(r)  (93,295,780)  (73,271,853)  (88,842,244)
 Gross profit  20   23,035,156   7,232,881   14,131,755 
                 
Operating (expenses)/income:                
 Sales and marketing      (233,630)  (549,299)  (1,710,024)
 General and administrative      (7,393,843)  (6,828,817)  (6,179,274)
 Other operating income  2(t)  910,743   2,493,898   313,153 
Total operating expenses      (6,716,730)  (4,884,218)  (7,576,145)
                 
 Income from operations      16,318,426   2,348,663   6,555,610 
 Non-operating income/(expenses):                
                 
 Interest income      38,850   3,552   51,403 
 Interest expense      (1,999,454)  (1,842,227)  (3,936,302)
 Foreign exchange (losses)/gains      (1,201,578)  (1,072,836)  894,704 
 Losses on derivatives, net      (7,971,934)  (134)  - 
 Gains on repurchase of convertible notes  12   13,693,269   212,056   - 
 Fair value change of warrant liability  13   1,312,500   577,500   - 
 Other loss      -   -   (43,516)
Total non-operating income/(expenses)      3,871,653   (2,122,089)  (3,033,711)
                 
Income before income tax      20,190,079   226,574   3,521,899 
 Income tax (expense)/benefit  9   23,191   (132,092)  (322,068)
                 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax      20,213,270   94,482   3,199,831 
Discontinued operations                
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations before income taxes  3   -   -   106,292,213 
Loss from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes  3   (24,591,585)  (32,631,226)  (79,782,830)
Income tax benefit/(expense)  3   (696,807)  (2,161,507)  4,748,324 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax      (25,288,392)  (34,792,733)  31,257,707 
 Net income (loss)     $(5,075,122) $(34,698,251) $34,457,538 
                 
Net income (loss) attributed to ReneSola Ltd     $(5,075,122) $(34,698,251) $34,457,538 
                 
Income per share from continuing operations                
 Basic  2(w), 17  $0.10  $-  $0.01 
 Diluted  2(w), 17  $0.10  $-  $0.01 
 Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations                
 Basic  2(w), 17  $(0.12) $(0.17) $0.13 
 Diluted  2(w), 17  $(0.12) $(0.17) $0.13 
Weighted average number of shares used in computing income (loss) per share                
 Basic      204,085,041   202,229,767   246,899,286 
 Diluted      204,222,541   202,403,904   246,905,289 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements


F-6 

RENESOLA LTD

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Net loss $(258,919,494) $(33,633,793) $(5,075,122)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of nil:            
Foreign currency translation adjustment  8,777,439   (2,533,628)  (19,503,275)
Other comprehensive income (loss)  8,777,439   (2,533,628)  (19,503,275)
Comprehensive loss  (250,142,055)  (36,167,421)  (24,578,397)
Less: comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest  (3,955)  (3,772)  - 
Comprehensive loss attributable to ReneSola Ltd $(250,138,100) $(36,163,649) $(24,578,397)
     Year ended December 31, 
  Note  2015  2016  2017 
 Net income/(loss)     $(5,075,122) $(34,698,251) $34,457,538 
 Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax of nil:                
 Foreign currency translation adjustment      (19,503,275)  (10,343,509)  11,513,216 
 Release of translation difference due to disposal of discontinued operation      -   -   (64,984,682)
 Other comprehensive loss      (19,503,275)  (10,343,509)  (53,471,466)
 Comprehensive loss  2(y)  (24,578,397)  (45,041,760)  (19,013,928)
 Comprehensive loss attributable to ReneSola Ltd     $(24,578,397) $(45,041,760) $(19,013,928)

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements


F-7 

RENESOLA LTD

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Amount expressed in U.S. dollars, except number of shares)

 

  Common shares  Treasury   Additional
paid-in
  Retained
earnings
(accumulated
  Accumulated
other
comprehensive
  Equity
(Deficit)
attributable
to ReneSola
  Non
controlling
  Total Equity  
  Shares  Amount  stock  capital  deficit)  income  Ltd  interest  (Deficit) 
                            
Balance at   January 1, 2013  172,773,664  $421,460,573  $-  $5,250,487  $(137,656,215) $74,836,221  $363,891,066  $512,419  $364,403,485 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (258,915,539)  -   (258,915,539)  (3,955)  (258,919,494)
Other comprehensive income , net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   8,777,439   8,777,439   -   8,777,439 
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   1,626,560   -   -   1,626,560   -   1,626,560 
Share exercised by employee  593,800   1,405,098   -   (927,269)  -   -   477,829   -   477,829 
Issuance of ordinary shares (net of issuance cost of $4,551,958)  30,000,000   52,950,543   -   -   -   -   52,950,543   -   52,950,543 
Repurchase from non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (299,818)  (299,818)
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2013  203,367,464  $475,816,214  $-  $5,949,778  $(396,571,754) $83,613,660  $168,807,898  $208,646  $169,016,544 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (33,630,021)  -   (33,630,021)  (3,772)  (33,633,793)
Other comprehensive income , net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   (2,533,628)  (2,533,628)  -   (2,533,628)
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   2,240,126   -   -   2,240,126   -   2,240,126 
Share exercised by employee  410,000   949,674   -   (677,730)  -   -   271,944   -   271,944 
Repurchase from non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (204,874)  (204,874)
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2014  203,777,464  $476,765,888  $-  $7,512,174  $(430,201,775) $81,080,032  $135,156,319  $-  $135,156,319 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (5,075,122)  -   (5,075,122)  -   (5,075,122)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   (19,503,275)  (19,503,275)  -   (19,503,275)
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   1,527,494   -   -   1,527,494   -   1,527,494 
Share exercised by employee  1,043,000   2,010,998   -   (1,370,318)  -   -   640,680   -   640,680 
Repurchase of common shares  -   (812,184)  812,184   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Cancellation of ADSs  (1,614,776)  -   (812,184)  -   -   -   (812,184)  -   (812,184)
Balance at December 31, 2015  203,205,688   477,964,702   -   7,669,350   (435,276,897)  61,576,757   111,933,912   -   111,933,912 

  Common shares  Treasury stock  Additional     Accumulated
other
  Equity    
  Number of
Shares Issued
  Amount  Number of
Shares
  Amount  paid-in
capital
  Accumulated
deficit
  comprehensive
income
  attributable to
ReneSola Ltd
   Total Equity 
                            
Balance at January 1, 2015  204,846,064  $476,765,888   -  $-  $7,512,174  $(430,201,775) $81,080,032  $135,156,319  $135,156,319 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (5,075,122)  -   (5,075,122)  (5,075,122)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   -   (19,503,275)  (19,503,275)  (19,503,275)
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   -   1,527,494   -   -   1,527,494   1,527,494 
Share exercised by employee  100,000   2,010,998   -   -   (1,370,318)  -   -   640,680   640,680 
Repurchase of common shares  -   -   1,614,776   (812,184)  -   -   -   (812,184)  (812,184)
Cancellation of shares  (1,614,776)  (812,184)  (1,614,776)  812,184   -   -   -   -   - 
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2015  203,331,288   477,964,702   -   -   7,669,350   (435,276,897)  61,576,757   111,933,912   111,933,912 
                                     
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (34,698,251)  -   (34,698,251)  (34,698,251)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   -   (10,343,509)  (10,343,509)  (10,343,509)
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   -   746,980   -   -   746,980   746,980 
Share exercised by employee  500,000   187,000   -   -   (187,000)  -   -   -   - 
Repurchase of common shares  -   -   2,804,286   (1,493,352)  -   -   -   (1,493,352)  (1,493,352)
Cancellation of shares  (1,352,586)  (980,215)  (1,352,586)  980,215   -   -   -   -   - 
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2016  202,478,702   477,171,487   1,451,700   (513,137)  8,229,330   (469,975,148)  51,233,248   66,145,780   66,145,780 
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   34,457,538   -   34,457,538   34,457,538 
Release of translation difference due to disposal of discontinued operation  -   -   -   -   -   -   (64,984,682)  (64,984,682)  (64,984,682)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   -   11,513,216   11,513,216   11,513,216 
Issuance of ordinary shares in conjunction with disposal of discontinued operations  180,000,000   42,480,000   -   -   -   -   -   42,480,000   42,480,000 
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   -   870,618   -   -   870,618   870,618 
Share exercised by employee  -   87,500   -   -   (87,500)  -   -   -   - 
Cancellation of shares  (1,451,700)  (513,137)  (1,451,700)  513,137   -   -   -   -   - 
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2017  381,027,002  $519,225,850   -  $-  $9,012,448  $(435,517,610) $(2,238,218) $90,482,470  $90,482,470 

  

See notes to consolidated financial statements


F-8 

RENESOLA LTD

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Operating activities:            
Net loss $(258,919,494) $(33,633,793) $(5,075,122)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
Impairment of long-lived assets  202,756,739   -   - 
Inventory write-down  740,087   808,031   619,858 
Depreciation  112,894,150   90,223,634   90,112,980 
Amortization of deferred convertible notes issuance costs and
premium
  784,456   933,152   764,527 
Allowance of doubtful receivables , advance to suppliers and prepayment for purchases of property, plant and equipment  3,658,491   5,710,167   117,520 
Losses(gains)on derivatives  (633,964)  (6,057,941)  6,030,915 
Share-based compensation  1,626,560   2,240,126   1,527,494 
Loss on disposal of long-lived assets  631,567   1,486,466   4,658,023 
Customer advance forfeited  (34,706,867)  -   - 
Provision(reversal) for litigation  (4,017,232)  -   - 
Gain on disposal of land use right  (4,693,760)  (64,283)  - 
Fair value change of warrant liability  (3,202,500)  (7,455,000)  (1,312,500)
Gain from settlement of certain payable  -   -   (9,125,954)
Gains on repurchase of convertible notes  -   (7,048,188)  (13,693,269)
Gain on disposal of  subsidiaries  -   (8,253,229)  - 
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Accounts receivable  (18,563,418)  27,669,692   (28,886,971)
Notes receivable  (6,798,635)  17,940,468   (29,876,409)
Inventories  (97,019,340)  (19,210,219)  121,765,462 
Advances to suppliers  10,145,556   (8,237,614)  8,282,514 
Amounts due to/from related parties  476,787   (1,508,056)  (432,998)
Value added tax recoverable  (7,841,886)  (2,370,868)  4,279,053 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  9,726,118   40,319,263   15,169,401 
Prepaid land use right  8,207,466   512,595   694,895 
Accounts payable  156,692,295   (174,893,352)  (158,969,132)
Advances from customers  67,651,345   (15,231,114)  (58,666,118)
Income tax payables  2,869,657   (3,795,493)  (2,423,668)
Other current liabilities  3,877,495   9,224,022   (2,951,445)
Deferred revenue  -   -   32,376,386 
Other non-current assets  -   (158,952)  - 
Other long-term liabilities  (8,689,735)  (2,874,319)  (1,728,349)
Accrued warranty expense  9,842,133   8,043,681   5,759,388 
Deferred tax assets  (3,832,046)  (2,151,417)  2,537,916 
Project assets and deferred project costs  (25,100,741)  (33,856,418)  20,655,210 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  118,561,284   (121,688,959)  2,209,607 
  

Years ended December 31,

 
  2015  2016  2017 
Operating activities:            
Net income/(loss) $(5,075,122) $(34,698,251) $34,457,538 
Less: (Income)/loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  25,288,392   34,792,733   (31,257,707)
Net income from continuing operations  20,213,270   94,482   3,199,831 
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation  3,548,898   2,400,522   4,475,823 
Amortization of deferred convertible notes issuance costs and premium  764,527   32,935   - 
Losses on derivatives  7,971,934   134   - 
Share-based compensation  1,527,494   746,980   870,618 
Deferred tax provision for continuing operations  (57,912)  (151,737)  88,048 
Fair value change of warrant liability  (1,312,500)  (577,500)  - 
Gains on repurchase of convertible notes  (13,693,269)  (212,056)  - 
Gains on disposal of  solar project  -   (2,526,572)  - 
Changes in working capital, excluding impact of dispositions:            
Accounts receivable  (716,614)  (301,339)  (22,371,300)
Project assets and deferred project costs  (4,993,507)  (35,788,345)  (30,731,709)
Contract costs  -   -   (12,192,302)
Advances to suppliers  (11,609,809)  7,383,527   3,864,146 
Amounts due to related parties  -   -   14,353,175 
Value added tax recoverable  1,789,846   3,244,727   (9,052,607)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,939,349   (313,134)  (8,625,177)
Accounts payable  2,562,150   (2,432,060)  24,452,548 
Advances from customers  (48,762)  83,406   (282,019)
Income tax payables  -   -   284,182 
Salary payable  -   -   560,416 
Other current liabilities  (1,226,744)  7,559,456   (1,802,578)
Deferred project revenue  32,376,386   -   (13,878,685)
Other non-current assets  -   (3,250,650)  103,535 
Net cash  provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations  39,034,737   (24,007,224)  (46,684,055)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operation  (36,825,130)  51,541,103   65,114,169 
Net cash  provided by operating activities $2,209,607  $27,533,879  $18,430,114 

 

F-9

F-9 

 

 

RENESOLA LTD

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS-(Continued)

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Investing activities:            
Purchases of property, plant and equipment  (90,139,831)  (51,813,162)  (14,437,852)
Advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment  (36,098,206)  (2,699,262)  (2,383,131)
Cash received from government subsidy  16,819,424   12,218,438   - 
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment  442,134   93,411   5,751,414 
Proceeds from disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed  -   18,679,663   - 
Changes in restricted cash  (80,916,131)  134,584,395   (24,503,612)
Increase in investments  -   -   (83,150)
Net cash received (paid) on settlement of derivatives  290,341   4,397,504   (4,371,142)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (189,602,269)  115,460,987   (40,027,473)
Financing activities:            
Proceeds from bank borrowings  1,452,032,406   1,063,769,258   1,100,033,042 
Proceeds from related parties  -   4,000,000   3,000,000 
Repayment to related parties  -   -   (7,000,000)
Repayment of bank borrowings  (1,450,351,941)  (1,045,904,061)  (1,052,642,690)
Cash paid for issuance costs  (4,551,958)  -   - 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  477,829   993,329   640,680 
Repurchase of convertible notes  -   (9,809,860)  (54,376,600)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares and detachable warrant  70,050,000   -   - 
Repurchase from non-controlling interests  (36,244)  -   - 
Cash paid for ADSs repurchase  -   -   (812,183)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  67,620,092   13,048,666   (11,157,751)
Effect of exchange rate changes  (3,089,712)  6,254,232   (12,826,762)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (6,510,605)  13,074,926   (61,802,379)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  93,283,283   86,772,678   99,847,604 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $86,772,678  $99,847,604  $38,045,225 
Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions            
Project assets reclassified to property, plant and equipment, net $16,672,267  $27,127,591   - 
Payables for purchase of property, plant and equipment $12,932,775  $45,377,459  $37,754,500 
Banknotes, included in notes receivable, used to purchase  equipment $18,238,523  $13,321,415  $24,984,882 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information            
Interest paid $52,566,232  $42,309,295  $44,833,732 
Income tax paid (return) $(1,343,124) $5,866,131  $2,395,594 
  Years ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
Investing activities:            
Purchase of property, plant and equipment $-  $-  $(80,314,313)
Proceeds from disposal of power stations  -   3,190,678   - 
Lending to related parties  -   -   (1,624,261)
Repayment of lending by related parties  -   -   2,000,000 
Changes in restricted cash  1,887,485   -   - 
Net cash paid on settlement of derivatives  (6,293,929)  (134)  - 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continued operation  (4,406,444)  3,190,544   (79,938,574)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations (including cash from discontinued operation of $13,774,473 disposed of)  (35,621,029)  38,969,387   (76,415,127)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (40,027,473)  42,159,931   (156,353,701)
Financing activities:            
Proceed from bank borrowings  -   -   6,101,351 
Repayment of bank borrowings  (1,239,145)  (1,128,727)  - 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  640,680   -   - 
Repurchase of convertible notes  (54,376,600)  (25,931,219)  - 
Cash paid for common shares repurchase  (812,183)  (1,493,350)  - 
Borrowings from related parties  -   -   11,343,739 
Repayment of borrowings from related parties  -   -   (2,041,201)
Repayment of capital lease obligation  -   -   (976,966)
Proceeds from failed sale-lease back agreements  -   -   38,722,123 
Repayment of failed sale-lease back financing  -   -   (251,213)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from continued operation  (55,787,248)  (28,553,296)  52,897,833 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from discontinued operation  44,629,497   (33,820,418)  49,505,882 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (11,157,751)  (62,373,714)  102,403,715 
Effect of exchange rate changes  (12,826,762)  (8,028,939)  11,612,791 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (61,802,379)  (708,843)  (23,907,081)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year (includes $23,463,634, $33,371,486 of cash in assets of discontinued operations on December 31, 2015 and 2016)  99,847,604   38,045,225   37,336,382 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $38,045,225  $37,336,382  $13,429,301 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information            
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest  2,919,990   2,973,128   3,936,302 
Income tax paid  -   79,976   42,877 
Non-cash investing and financing transactions            
Payables for purchase of property, plant and equipment  -   (2,051,958)  (25,562,367)
Payable for capital lease  -   -   (28,783,346)
Issuance of ordinary shares for the disposal of discontinued business  -   -   - 

 

F-10 

See notes to consolidated financial statements


RENESOLA LTD

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

ReneSola Ltd was incorporated in the British Virgin Island on March 17, 2006. On January 29, 2008, the Company became listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in the United States. ReneSola Ltd and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) arewere principally engaged in the manufacture and sale of solar power products including virgin polysilicon, monocrystalline and multi crystalline solar wafers and photovoltaic (PV) cells and modules. From 2012, the Company began entering into arrangements to develop commercial solar power projects, or project assets, which consists primarily of solar power project development, engineering, procurementEngineering, Procurement and construction ("EPC"Construction (“EPC”) services. On September 29, 2017, the Company announced that it completed restructuring to dispose of its manufacturing business (including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing) and LED distribution business (collectively the “discontinued business”) to a related party to help the Company transform its business model to focus on its solar power project business (Note 3).

 

The following table lists major subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2015:

SubsidiariesDate of 
acquisition
Date of
 incorporation
Place of 
incorporation
Date of
commencement
Percentage of
ownership
ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd.
formerly known as ZhejiangYuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (“ReneSola Zhejiang”)
N/AAugust 7, 2003People’s Republic of
China (“PRC”)
July, 2005100%
ReneSola America Inc.
(“ReneSola America”)
N/ANovember 12, 2006United States of AmericaNovember, 2006100%
ReneSola Singapore Pte Ltd.
(“ReneSola Singapore”)
N/AMarch 28, 2007SingaporeMay, 2007100%
Sichuan ReneSola Silicon Material Co., Ltd.
(“Sichuan ReneSola”)*
N/AAugust 25, 2007PRCJuly, 2009100%
ReneSola Jiangsu Ltd.
(“ReneSola Jiangsu”)
May 31, 2009November 8, 2005PRCMay 31, 2009100%
Zhejiang ReneSola System Integration Ltd. Formerly known as Zhejiang ReneSola Photovoltaic Materials Co., Ltd.
(“Zhejiang ReneSola PV Materials”)
N/AApril 30,2010PRCJanuary, 2011100%
Sichuan Ruiyu New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
(“Sichuan Ruiyu”)
N/AAugust 24,2010PRCJuly, 2011100%
Sichuan Ruixin Photovoltaic Materials Co., Ltd.
(“Sichuan Ruixin”)
N/ANovember 23, 2010PRCN/A*100%
Sichuan SiLiDe Composite Materials  Co., Ltd.
(“Sichuan SiLiDe”)
N/AJuly 11, 2011PRCN/A*100%
ReneSola Deutschland GmbH
(“ReneSola Germany”)
N/ASeptember26, 2011GermanyAugust, 2012100%
ReneSola New Energy S.A.R.L
(“ReneSola New Energy”)
N/AMarch 28, 2012LuxemburgN/A*100%
NOVE ECO ENERGY EOOD
(“NOVE”)
April 9, 2012November 4, 2009Bulgaria August, 2012100%
MG SOLAR SYSTEMS EOOD
(“MG”)
April 9, 2012October 27, 2009Bulgaria August, 2012100%
ReneSola Australia PTY LTD
(“ReneSola Australia”)
N/AJuly 30, 2012AustraliaNovember, 2012100%
ReneSola Japan Ltd.
(“ReneSola Japan”)
N/AJuly 9, 2012JapanNovember, 2012100%
LUCAS EST S.R.L
(“LUCAS”).
September 13, 2012December 17, 2008RomaniaJanuary, 2014100%
ECOSFER ENERGY S.R.L
(“ECOSFER”).
September 26, 2012November 17, 2011RomaniaJanuary, 2014100%

SubsidiariesDate of 
acquisition
Date of
 incorporation
Place of 
incorporation
Date of
commencement
Percentage of
ownership
ReneSola India Private Limited
(“ReneSola India”)
N/ANovember 22, 2012IndiaDecember, 2012100%
Lucas Est Korea Co., Ltd
(“Lucas Korea”)
N/AMarch 12, 2013KoreaN/A*100%
Ecosfer Energy Korea Co., Ltd
(“Ecosfer Korea”)
N/AMarch 12, 2013KoreaN/A*100%
ReneSola UK Limited
(“ReneSola UK”)
N/AApril 11, 2013UKJuly, 2013100%
ReneSola Shanghai Ltd
(“ReneSola Shanghai”)
N/AMay 30, 2013PRCOctober, 2013100%
ReneSola South Africa Proprietary Limited
(“ReneSola South Africa”)
N/AJuly 6, 2013South AfricaFebruary, 2014100%
ReneSola Panama Inc.
(“ReneSola Panama”)
N/ADecember 28, 2013PanamaMarch, 2014100%
ReneSola France SAS
(“ReneSola France”)
N/AFebruary 7, 2014FranceJuly, 2014100%
ReneSola Italy S.R.L.
(“ReneSola Italy”)
N/AMarch 28, 2014Italy June, 2014100%
ReneSola(Thailand) Inc.
(“ReneSola Thailand”)
N/AFebruary 24, 2014ThailandFebruary, 2015100%
RENESOLA MEXICO,S,de R.L de C.V.
(“ReneSola Mexico”)
N/AApril 10, 2014MexicoJuly, 2014100%
RENESOLA TURKEY GüNES ENERJISI TEKNOLOJI HIZMETLERI VE TICARET L
(“ReneSola Turkey”)
N/AApril 22, 2014TurkeyAugust, 2014100%
PT. ReneSola Clean Energy
(“ReneSola Indonesia”)
N/AMay 14, 2014IndonesiaFebruary, 2015100%
RENESOLA DO BRASIL COMERCIO E REPRENTACAO LTDA
(“ReneSola Brazil”)
N/AMay 12, 2014BrazilDecember, 2015100%
RENESOLA ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL GMBH
(“ReneSola Austria”)
N/AJuly 22, 2014AustriaDecember, 2014100%
RENESOLA Canada Limited
(“ReneSola Canada")
N/AJune 23, 2014CanadaDecember, 2014100%
ReneSola Investment Management Ltd
("ReneSola Investment")
N/ADecember 2, 2014British Virgin IslandJuly, 2015100%
Renesola Energy, INC.N/ADecember 22, 2014United StatesSeptember, 2015100%
Renesola Power, Inc. ("Renesola Power")N/AJuly 23, 2015United StatesN/A*100%
Renesola UK Rooftop Limited ("Renesola UK Rooftop")N/AAugust 6, 2015UKN/A*100%
Baynergy, LLC ("Baynergy")N/AJuly 8, 2015United StatesN/A*100

%

*: These companies had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2015.


2. SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

(a) Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that wethe Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business are dependent on, among other things, the Company’s ability to generate cash flows from operations, and the Company’s ability to arrange adequate financing arrangements, including the renewal or rollover of its bank borrowings, to support its working capital requirements.

 

The Company has performed a review of its cash flow forecast for at least the twelve months following factors raise substantial doubt about our abilitythe issuance date of these financial statements. The Company expects the solar power project business to generate positive cash inflow in the forecasted period. In addition, the Company plans to continue its financing arrangements, such as a going concern forrenew and enter into new bank borrowings and financing lease and other arrangements, and equity contribution to meet the foreseeable future.

·For the year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred a net loss of $5,075,122.

·As of December 31, 2015, our current liabilities exceed our current assets by $466,111,583. While the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $38,045,225, it had short-term bank borrowings of $667,682,811 all due within one year and the current portion of long-term debt amounting to $1,104,735, which is not expected to be renewed.

·There is a put option held by the convertible bond holders, whereby on March 15, 2016 they may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their notes at a price equal to 100% of the principle amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest. As of December 31, 2015, the convertible notes payable balance is $26,145,000. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased all of its outstanding convertible notes of approximately $26,145,000 par value using cash of 25.9 million.

These factors are mitigated by the following plansworking capital and actions:expenditures requirements.

·As of April 2016, the Company has performed a review of its cash flow forecast for the twelve months ending April 2017. The Company believes that its operating cash flow in the forecasted period will be positive. While management believes the forecast is based on reasonable assumptions include: i) the cost to produce modules and wafers is estimated to be marginally lower for the forecasted period ending April 2017, respectively, as a result of continuous cost control effectiveness, and ii) the Company expects the solar project business to generate positive cash inflow in the forecasted period.

·While there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to refinance its short-term bank borrowings as they become due, historically, the Company has rolled over or obtained replacement borrowings from existing credit for most of its short-term bank loans upon the maturity date of the loans. As of March 31, 2016, the Company has successfully rolled over $87.7 million short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and has assumed it will continue to be able to do so for the foreseeable future.

·As of March 31, 2016, the Company has unused lines of credit of $110.4 million, of which $73.4 million is related to trade financing. Based on the Company's historical experience, trade facilities funding request will be approved in the normal course provided that the Company submits the required supporting documentation and the amount is within the credit limit granted.

·In March 2016, the Company received non-binding letters of commitment from four banks to support their financing in the amount of $426.0 million, of which $299.2 million is related to short term loan and $126.8 million related to trade financing. However, the non-binding letters of commitment from banks do not have a stated term, and may be withdrawn by the banks at their discretion.

·In 2015, the Company executed sales agreements in connection with the transfer of 13.5 megawatts (“MW”), and completed sales of 57.5 MW and 1.85 MW of utilities scale projects in United Kingdom and Japan, respectively. As of March 31, 2016, the Company completed the construction and connection of additional 24.34MW utilities scale projects in the United Kingdom, 20MW of which the Company has received letters of intent. This is estimated to generate positive cash inflow in the forecasted period.

 

Based on the above factors, management believes that adequate sources of liquidity will exist to fund the Company’s working capital and capital expenditures requirements, and to meet its short term debt obligations, other liabilities and commitments as they become due.due for at least twelve months from the issuance date of these financial statements.

Disposal of manufacturing business and LED distribution business

On September 25, 2017 (the “Disposal Date”), the Company transferred all of the Company’s assets and liabilities related to its manufacturing business (including polysilicon, solar wafer, solar cell and solar module manufacturing) and LED distribution business to Mr. Xianshou Li, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, through a transfer of all the share capital in ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd. (“ReneSola Singapore”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ReneSola prior to the Disposal Date.

The financial results of ReneSola Singapore, together with its subsidiaries, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, and the 9 months ended September 30, 2017 have been classified as discontinued operations within the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As the disposal date was just prior to the end of the quarter, there was no material transactions during the 5 days between September 25 and September 30, 2017; therefore, the disposal transaction was measured as of September 30, 2017. Unless otherwise indicated, amounts provided in these Notes pertain to continuing operations only (see Note 3 for information on discontinued operations).

(b) Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of ReneSola Ltd and its subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized profits and losses have been eliminated on consolidation.

 

(c) Discontinued operations

A component of a reporting entity or a group of components of a reporting entity that are disposed or meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale, such as the management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the disposal group, should be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. Discontinued operations are reported when a component of an entity comprising operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity is classified as held for disposal or has been disposed of, if the component either (1) represents a strategic shift or (2) have a major impact on an entity’s financial results and operations. Examples include a disposal of a major geographical location, line of business, or other significant part of the entity, or disposal of a major equity method investment. In the consolidated statement of operations, result from discontinued operations is reported separately from the income and expenses from continuing operations and prior periods are presented on a comparative basis. In order to present the financial effects of the continuing operations and discontinued operations, revenues and expenses arising from intra-group transactions are eliminated except for those revenues and expenses that are considered to continue after the disposal of the discontinued operations.

F-13

F-11 

 

(c)(d) Fair value measurement

The Company estimates fair value of financial assets and liabilities as the price that would be received from the sales of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) on the measurement date in an orderly transaction between market participants.

 

When available, the Company measures the fair value of financial instruments based on quoted market prices in active markets, valuation techniques that use observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. When observable market prices are not readily available, the Company generally estimates the fair value using valuation techniques that rely on alternate market data or inputs that are generally less readily observable from objective sources and are estimated based on pertinent information available at the time of the applicable reporting periods. See Note 8, “Fair Value Measurements”, for further details.

 

(d)(e) Use of estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting periods presented. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Significant accounting estimates are susceptible to changes with the acquisition of the information, which include revenue recognition for sales of solar power projects, inputs used to recognize revenue over time, EPC warranties, allowances for doubtful receivables, advances to suppliers and prepayment for PPE, valuation of deferred tax assets, accruals of warranty expenses, recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets and project assets.

 

(e)(f) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents represent cash on hand and held with banks, including demand deposits, which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use, and which have original maturities of three months or less when purchased.

 

(f) Restricted cash

Restricted cash represents amounts held by banks, which are not available for the Company’s general use, as security for issuance of letters of credit, bank acceptance bills, bank borrowings and bank drafts. Upon maturity of the letters of credit and repayment of bank acceptance bills, bank borrowings and bank drafts which generally occur within one year, the deposits are released by the bank and become available for general use by the Company.

(g) Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the weighted-average method for work-in-process and finished goods and by the first-in-first-out method for raw materials. Inventory costs comprise direct materials, direct labor and those overhead costs that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.

Adjustments are recorded to write down the cost of obsolete and excess inventory to the estimated market value based on historical and forecast demand. The estimated market value is measured as the estimated selling price of each class of the inventories in the ordinary course of business less estimated costs of completion and disposal and normal profit margin.

The Company outsources portions of its manufacturing process, including cutting ingots into wafers, converting wafers into solar cells and converting solar cells or wafers into modules, to various third-party manufacturers. These outsourcing arrangements may or may not include transfer of title of the raw material inventory (ingots or wafers) sent to the third-party manufacturers.

For the outsourcing arrangements in which title does not transfer, the Company maintains such inventory on the Company’s balance sheet as raw materials inventory while it is in physical possession of the third-party manufacturer. Upon receipt of the processed inventory, it is reclassified as work-in-process inventory and the processing fees paid are capitalized as cost of inventory.

For those outsourcing arrangements in which title (including risk of loss) does transfer to the third-party manufacturer, the Company is contractually obligated to repurchase the processed inventory. To accomplish this, it enters into raw material sales agreements and processed inventory purchase agreements simultaneously with the third-party manufacturer. In such instances, where they are, in substance tolling arrangements, the Company retains the inventory in the consolidated balance sheets while it is in the physical possession of the third-party manufacturer. The cash received from the third-party manufacturer is recorded as a current liability on the balance sheet rather than revenue or deferred revenue. Upon receipt of the processed inventory, it is reclassified from raw materials to work-in-progress inventory and the processing fee paid to the third-party manufacturer is added to inventory cost. Cash payments for outsourcing arrangements which require prepayment for repurchase of the processed inventory are classified as current assets on the balance sheet. If there is no legal right of offset established by these arrangements, the associated assets and liabilities are presented separately on the balance sheet until the processed inventory is returned to the Company.


The Company provides solar wafer processing services on behalf of third parties who have their own polysilicon supplies. Under certain of these solar wafer processing service arrangements, the Company purchases raw materials from a customer and agrees to sell a specified quantity of solar wafers produced from such materials back to the same customer. The quantity of solar wafers sold back to the customer under these processing arrangements is consistent with the amount of raw materials purchased from the customer based on current production conversion rates. The Company records revenue from these processing transactions based on the amount received for solar wafers sold less the amount paid for the raw materials purchased from the customer. The revenue recognized is recorded as solar wafer processing revenue and the production costs incurred related to providing the processing services are recorded as solar wafer processing costs within cost of revenue.

The Company also provides module processing services on behalf of third parties who have their own cell supplies. Under certain of these module processing service arrangements, the Company purchases cells from a customer and agrees to sell a specified quantity of modules produced from such materials back to the same customer. The quantity of modules sold back to the customer under these processing arrangements is consistent with the amount of cells purchased from the customer based on current production conversion rates. The Company records revenue from these processing transactions based on the amount received for modules sold less the amount paid for the cells purchased from the customer. The revenue recognized is recorded as module processing revenue and the production costs incurred related to providing the processing services are recorded as module processing costs within cost of revenue.

On occasion, the Company enters into firm purchase commitments to acquire materials from its suppliers. A firm purchase commitment represents an agreement that specifies all significant terms, including the price and timing of the transactions, and includes a disincentive for nonperformance that is sufficiently large to make performance probable. This disincentive is generally in the form of a “take or pay” provision which requires the Company to pay for committed volumes regardless of whether the Company actually takes possession of the materials. The Company evaluates these agreements whenever market prices decrease such that the commitment price is significantly higher than market, if any, using a lower of cost or market approach consistent with that used to value inventory (see Note 5).

(h) Project assets and deferred project costs

 

In 2012, the Company began entering into arrangements to develop commercial solar power projects ("(“project assets"assets”) for sale upon their completion. Project assets consist primarily of costs relating to solar power projects in various stages of development that are capitalized prior to entering into a definitive sales agreement for the solar power project. These costs include certain acquisition costs, land costs and costs for developing and constructing a solar power project. Development costs can include legal, consulting, permitting, and other similar costs. Construction costs can include execution of field construction, installation of solar equipment, and solar modules and related equipment. Interest costs incurred on debt during the construction phase are also capitalized within project assets. The Company does not depreciate the project assets, when they are considered held for sale. Any revenue generated from a solar power project connected to the grid would be considered incidental revenue and accounted for as a reduction of the capitalized project costs for development. In addition, the Company presents all expenditures related to the development and construction of project assets as a component of cash flows from operating activities.

 

During the development phase, these project assets are accounted for in accordance with the recognition, initial measurement and subsequent measurement subtopics of ASC 970- 360, as they are considered in substance real estate.Whileestate. While the solar power projects are in the development phase, they are generally classified as non-current assets, unless it is anticipated that construction will be completed and sale will occur within one year.

 

Project assets are classifiedThe Company capitalizes the costs related to solar power projects in various stages of development prior to entering into a definitive sales agreement for the solar power project and classifies these costs as currentproject assets on the consolidated balance sheets when the criteria in ASC 360-10-45-9 are met. If not met, the Company reclassifies them to property, plant and equipment, unless the delay in the period required to complete the sale is caused by events or circumstances beyond the Company'sCompany’s control. In 2014, the Company reclassified two project assets in Romania to property, plant and equipment with the carrying value of $27,127,591.

 

Deferred project costs represents costs that are capitalized as deferred project assets for arrangements that are accounted for as real estate transactions after the Company has entered into a definitive sales arrangement, but before the sale is completed or before all criteria to recognize the sale as revenue is met. The Company classifies deferred project costs as noncurrent if satisfaction of all revenue recognition criteria are not expected within the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2015, the Company entered into a sale transaction for one project asset, which includes contractual provisions which may require the Company to repurchase the project asset under certain circumstances.circumstances, and the revenue recognition criteria is not met until the issuance of the final acceptance certificate (“FAC”) by the customer. The repurchase provisions expireexpired on June 30, 2017. In connection with2017 and the FAC was received in March 2018. Deferred project costs as of December 31, 2016 and 2017 were derived from this transaction,one project. Therefore, the Company has classified the project asset as non-current deferred project costs as of December 31, 2016 and the cash received in connection with the sales pricecurrent deferred project cost as deferred revenue of $20,874,446 and $25,378,112, respectively.December 31, 2017.

��

F-12 

The Company reviews project assets and deferred project costs for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers a project commercially viable or recoverable if it is anticipated to be sold for a profit once it is either fully developed or fully constructed. The Company considers a partially developed or partially constructed project commercially viable or recoverable if the anticipated selling price is higher than the carrying value of the related project assets.assets and the estimated costs to complete. The Company examines a number of factors to determine if the project will be recoverable, the most notable of which include whether there are any changes in environmental, ecological, permitting, market pricing or regulatory conditions that impact the project. Such changes could cause the costs of the project to increase or the selling price of the project to decrease. If a project is not considered recoverable, the Company impairs the respective project assets and adjusts the carrying value to the estimated recoverable amount, with the resulting impairment recorded within operations. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses on project assets for the years ended December 31, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

F-15(h) Contract costs

 

The Company provides EPC services including engineering design, construction contracting and management, procurement of PV modules, balance-of-system components and other components. Contract costs generally include all direct costs, such as materials, direct labor, and subcontracts, and indirect costs identifiable with or allocable to the contracts.

Contract costs also include the costs related to the design, engineering, and costs of all PV modules and materials needed for the projects for the cooperation arrangements with third party to jointly construct the power projects for sale.

Contract costs are accumulated and are charged to operations as the related revenue from contracts is recognized. Refer to the note 2 (r) Solar power project development section c) and note 2 (r) EPC services for the corresponding revenue streams.

 

(i) Investments

Investments in marketable equity securities are classified as trading, or available-for-sale. Investments classified as trading are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Investments classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income. The cost of investments sold is determined by specific identification.

Investments are evaluated for impairment at the end of each period. Unrealized losses are recorded to other expenses when a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company reviews several factors to determine whether a loss is other-than-temporary. These factors include, but are not limited to, the: (1) nature of the investment; (2) cause and duration of the impairment; (3) extent to which fair value is less than cost; (4) financial conditions and near term prospects of the issuers; and (5) ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

The Company routinely reviews available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value below the cost basis, and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, the security is written down to fair value. No other-than-temporary impairment loss was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015.

(j) Advances to suppliers and advances for purchasepurchases of property, plant and equipment

 

In order to secure a stable supply of silicon materials and construction materials, the Company makes advance payments to suppliers for raw material supplies and advances for purchases of long-lived assets which are offset against future deliveries. Advances to suppliers for purchases expected within twelve months as of each balance sheet date are recorded as advances to suppliers in current assets and those associated with purchases expected over longer periods of time are recorded in non-current advance to suppliers. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, advances to suppliers in current assets were $27,493,901$ 4,220,864 and $18,479,686,$ 379,792, respectively, and non-current advances to suppliers for silicon raw materialconstruction materials supplies were both $nil.was nil. Advances for property, plant and equipment are recorded in non-current assets and were $1,756,051$416,201 and $381,958nil as of December 31, 20142016 and 2015, respectively.2017. The Company does not require collateral or other security against its advances to suppliers. As a result, the Company’s claims for such prepayments are unsecured, which exposes the Company to the suppliers’ credit risk. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of its material suppliers.suppliers

As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, the largest prepayments made to individual suppliers are as follows:

  At December 31, 
  2014  2015 
Supplier A  -  $6,400,000 
Supplier B  -  $1,070,954 
Supplier C $6,986,882   - 

As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment in excess of 10% of total advances and prepayments to equipment suppliers are as follows:

  At December 31, 
  2014  2015 
Supplier A  -  $71,783 
Supplier B  -  $66,689 
Supplier C $265,932   - 
Supplier D $265,126   - 
Supplier E $258,679   - 

 

(k)(j) Property, plant and equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.depreciation and impairment. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

Buildings40-50 years
Plant and machinery10-25 years
Motor vehicles4-5 years
Office equipment3-5 years
Solar power projectsPower stations25 years

Construction in progress represents mainly the construction of new facilities in ReneSola Zhejiang, ReneSola Jiangsu, Sichuan ReneSola,solar power projects the Company will own and Sichuan Ruiyu.operate for electricity generation. Costs incurred in the construction are capitalized and transferred to property, plant and equipment upon completion, at which time depreciation commences.

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. The gain or loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, if any, is the difference between the net sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the disposed assets, and is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations upon disposal.

 

(l)(k) Assets held-for-sale

 

Non-current assetsAssets and asset disposal groups are classified as held-for-sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when management has committed to a plan of sale and the sale is highly probable, the assets are available for immediate sale in their present condition and they are expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification. Non-current assetsAssets and liabilities classified as held for sale are measured at lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. In December 2015, the company had entered into an agreement

F-13 

Long-lived assets to sell property and land use right in Sichuan, China, and the assets have beenbe sold shall be classified as assets held for sale asconsidering the recognition criteria in ASC 360-10-45-9 in which all of December 31, 2015. This transaction is expected to close in the course of 2016.following criteria are met:

 

The company's assets held for sale are summarized below:

lManagement, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the asset.

 

  At December 31,2015 
Property, plant and equipment, net $3,530,744 
land use right, net $710,134 
Total $4,240,878 
lThe asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets.

lAn active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated.

lThe sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year.

lThe asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value.

lActions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

 

(m)(l) Interest capitalization

The Company capitalizes interest costs as part of the costs of constructing certain assets during the period of time required to get the assets ready for their intended use. The Company capitalizes interest to the extent that expenditures to construct an asset have occurred and interest costs have been incurred. The interest capitalized for project assets forms part of the cost of revenues when such project assets are sold and all revenue recognition criteria are met. The interest are capitalized for solar power projects that are classified as property, plant and equipment and built for the Company to own and operate for electricity generation before the projects are completed and put into operation. Interest capitalization ceases once a project is substantially complete or no longer undergoing construction activities to prepare it for its intended use.

 

(n) Prepaid land use right

Prepaid land use right represent payments made to obtain land use rights. Prepaid land use right is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period of 40-50 years.

Expenses recognized were $1,086,685, $779,703 and $910,157 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

(o)(m) Impairment of long-lived assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable or that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated. The Company assesses recoverability of the long-lived assets by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. The Company recognizes an impairment loss in the event the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets, measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the assets and the fair value of the impaired assets.

 

The impairment losses of long-lived assets were $202,756,739, $nil and $nilnil for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015 respectively (see Note 7).2017 respectively.

F-14 

(n) Leases

Leases are classified as capital or operating leases. A lease that transfers to the lessee substantially all the benefits and risks incidental to ownership is classified as a capital lease. At inception, a capital lease is recorded at the present value of minimum lease payments or the fair value of the asset, whichever is less. Assets under capital leases are amortized on a basis consistent with that of similar fixed assets or the lease term, whichever is less.

Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. From time to time, the Company’s subsidiaries are asked to prepay the lease costs for over one year. As of December 31, 2017, the prepaid rental fees of US$3,425,098 was recorded in other non-current assets.

For a sale-leaseback transaction, when the transaction involves real estate or integral equipment, sale-leaseback accounting shall be used by a seller-lessee only if the transaction includes all of the following a) A normal leaseback; b) Payment terms and provisions that adequately demonstrate the buyer-lessor’s initial and continuing investment in the property; c) Payment terms and provisions that transfer all of the other risks and rewards of ownership as demonstrated by the absence of any other continuing involvement by the seller-lessee.

Equipment is determined to be integral when the cost to remove the equipment from its existing location, ship and reinstall at a new site, including any diminution in fair value, exceeds 10% of the fair value of the equipment at the time of original installation.

If a sale-leaseback of real estate qualifies for sale-leaseback accounting, an analysis is performed to determine if the Company can record a sale and remove the assets from the balance sheet and recognize the lease; and if so, to determine whether to record the lease as either an operating or capital lease.

If a sale-leaseback transaction does not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting because of any form of continuing involvement by the seller-lessee other than a normal leaseback, it is accounted for as a financing, whichever is appropriate under ASC 360.

 

(p)(o) Deferred convertible notes issuance costs

Debt issuance costs are deferred and amortized using effective interest method through the earliest redemption date. The amortization, recorded in interest expense, was $784,456, $933,152$764,527, $32,935 and $764,527nil for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014and 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.

(p)Contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but the amount cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, is disclosed. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.

 

(q) Income taxes

 

Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, net operating loss carry forwards and credits by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Current income taxes are provided for in accordance with the laws of the relevant taxing authorities. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The componentsBefore 2016, the component of the deferred tax assets and liabilities arewere individually classified as current and non-current based on the characteristics of the underlying assets and liabilities, or the expected timing of their use when they dodid not relate to a specific asset or liability. From 2016, the Company adopted ASU2015-17 prospectively, and as of December 31, 2016 and 2017, the components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are all classified as non-current in a classified statement of financial position.

F-17

F-15 

 

  

(r) Revenue recognition

Solar power productsproject development

The Company sells solar power products including virgin polysilicon, monocrystalline and multicrystalline solar wafers and PV cells and modules. The Company also enters into agreements to process silicon materials into silicon ingots and wafers, and to process PV cells into modules for customers. The Company recognizes revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the products are delivered and title and risk of loss has passed to customers, the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales agreements typically contain customary product warranties but do not contain any post-shipment obligations nor any return or credit provisions.

 

A majoritya) Sale of the Company’s contracts provide that products are shipped under free on board (“FOB”) terms, cost, insurance and freight (“CIF”) terms or delivered duty unpaid (“DDU”) terms. Under FOB, the Company fulfills its obligation when the goods have passed over the ship’s rail at the named port of shipment. The customer bears all costs and risks of loss or damage to the goods from that point. Under CIF, the Company must pay the costs, insurance and freight necessary to bring the goods to the named port of destination, and bears the risk of loss or damage to the goods during transit. Under DDU, the Company is responsible for making a safe delivery of goods to a named destination, paying all transportation expenses but not the duty. The Company bears the risks and costs associated with supplying the good to the delivery location. The Company recognizes revenue when the title of goods and risk of loss or damage is transferred to the customers based on the terms of the sales contracts, and if the other recognition criteria are met.project assets

 

Solar power projects

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of project assets in accordance with ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales. For these transactions, the Company has determined that the project assets, which represent the costs of constructing solar power projects, represent “integral” equipment and as such, the entire transaction is in substance the sale of real estate and subject to the revenue recognition guidance under ASC 360-20 Real Estate. Under the provisions of real estate accounting, the Company recognizes revenue under full accrual method when all of the following requirements are met: (a) the sales are consummated; (b) the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate its commitment to pay; (c) the receivable is not subject to any future subordination; and (d) the Company has transferred the usual risk and rewards of ownership to the buyer. Specifically, the Company considers the following factors in determining whether the sales have been consummated: (a) the parties are bound by the terms of a contract; (b) all consideration has been exchanged; (c) permanent financing for which the seller is responsible has been arranged; and (d) all conditions precedent to closing have been performed, and the Company does not have any substantial continuing involvement with the project.

 

For sales agreements that have energy generation performance guarantees withincovering a certain timeframe, if there is an underperformance event, wethe Company may incur liquidated damages as a percentage of the EPC contract price. The Revenue recognized is reduced by the maximum amount of the payable liquidated damage, which amount is deferred until the end of the guarantee period.

 

For sales agreements that have conditional repurchase clauses if certain events occur, such as not achieving specified guaranteed performance level within a certain timeframe, wethe Company will defer and will not recognize revenue on such sales agreements until the conditional repurchase clauses are of no further force or effect and all other necessary revenue recognition criteria have been met.

 

b) Sale of project asset rights

The Company has recognized $nil, $nil and $110,737,934 from salesalso sells the project rights to customers through the disposal of project companies holding the relevant permits. For these transactions, the project companies could either own the land or lease the land under the lease term that could cover the entire power plant’s life. For the transactions with the land owned, the Company accounts the entire transaction under the revenue recognition guidance of ASC 360-20 Real Estate. Under the provisions of real estate accounting, the Company recognizes revenue under full accrual method when all of the requirements mentioned in the sale of project assets above are met. For the transactions with the land leased, the Company recognizes revenue when the revenue is realized or realizable and earned in accordance with ASC 605-10-S99-1. In these transactions, the Company is also responsible for locating the electricity end subscribers for certain percentage of the entire contract consideration. A consideration reduction will occur if the located end subscribers don’t reach to a defined threshold per the contract terms. The portion of the revenue is not recognized until the contingency has been removed, that is when the relevant subscription agreements are effective. Costs incurred during the course of obtaining permits are capitalized and recorded in project assets before the sale of project rights is completed.

c) Jointly arrangements of power projects for sale

The Company also enters into cooperation arrangement to jointly construct power projects for sale. In the arrangement, the Company’s performance obligations generally including design, engineering, procurement of all PV modules, materials needed for the projects and locating end subscriptions, while the counterparty is the primary obligor for constructing the power projects under the joint cooperation agreement, holds the ownership of the land and power projects and sell the power projects. The Company and the counterparty each generally receive 50% of the total selling price of the power projects. The Company recognizes revenue, representing 50% of the selling price of the power projects, from this arrangement when the revenue is realized or realizable and earned in accordance with ASC 605-10-S99-1, which is normally when the power projects are sold to the external buyers, when all of the following requirements are met: (a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (b) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (d) collectability is reasonably assured.

EPC Services

The Company provides engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) services under the EPC contracts to design and build the power plant on customer’s site per customer’s request.

The Company generally recognize revenue for EPC services over time using a percentage-of completion method as the Company’s performance creates or enhances an energy generation asset controlled by the customer per ASC 605-35. In applying the percentage-of-completion method, the Company follows the cost-to-cost method and uses the actual costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs (including module costs) in order to determine the progress towards completion and calculate the corresponding amount of revenue and profit to recognize. Costs incurred include direct materials, solar modules, labor, subcontractor costs, and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor and supplies. When contracts specify that title to direct materials and solar modules transfers to the customer before installation has been performed, the Company will not recognize revenue or the associated costs until those materials are installed and have met all other revenue recognition requirements.

F-16 

The percentage-of-completion method of revenue recognition requires the Company to make estimates of net contract revenues and costs to complete our projects. In making such estimates, management judgments are required to evaluate significant assumptions including the amount of net contract revenues, the cost of materials and labor, subcontractor costs, the impact of potential variances in schedule completion, and the impact of any penalties, claims, change orders, or performance incentives.

If estimated total costs on any contract are greater than the net contract revenues, the Company recognizes the entire estimated loss in the period the loss becomes known. The cumulative effect of the revisions to estimates related to net contract revenues and costs to complete contracts, including penalties, claims, change orders, performance incentives, anticipated losses, and others are recorded in the period in which the revisions to estimates are identified and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. The effect of the changes on future periods are recognized as if the revised estimates had been used since revenue was initially recognized under the contract. Such revisions could occur in any reporting period, and the effects may be material depending on the size of the contracts or the changes in estimates. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2017, no such revisions occur.

The Company bills the customer based on progress billing terms in the contract. Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled) represents revenue that has been recognized in advance of billing the customer, which is common for long-term construction contracts. The Company typically recognizes revenue from contracts for the construction and sale of PV solar power systems over time using cost based input methods, which recognizes revenue and gross profit as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred compared to the total estimated costs of the contract. Accordingly, revenue could be recognized in advance of billing the customer, resulting in an amount recorded to “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” as disclosed in Note 4. Once the Company has an unconditional right to consideration under a construction contract, the Company typically bills the customer accordingly and reclassifies the “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” to “Accounts receivable from EPC services (billed).” Billing requirements vary by contract but are generally structured around the completion of certain construction milestones. Certain of the EPC contracts for PV solar power systems contain retainage provisions. Retainage represents contract costs for the portion of the contract price earned for work performed, but held for payment by the customer as a form of security until certain defined timeframe has been reached. The Company considers whether collectability of such retainage is reasonably assured in connection with the Company’s overall assessment of the collectability of amounts due or that will become due under the EPC contracts. Retainage included within “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” is expected to be billed and collected within the next 12 months. After the Company has satisfied the EPC contract requirements and have an unconditional right to consideration, the retainage is billed and reclassified to “Accounts receivable from EPC services (billed).” Refer to Note 4 for detail breakdown of the “Accounts receivable from EPC services (unbilled)” and “Accounts receivable from EPC services (billed)” amounts.

For EPC services, the Company provides limited warranty for certain years for the modules, materials and construction part of the power plants. Although the Company subcontracts the construction to third party developers and purchase the raw materials and modules from third party suppliers, the Company is the primary obligor for the limited warranties such as solar module product warranty for a period of five to ten years, warranties for defects in engineering design, installation, workmanship for a period of one to two years and records a liability “Accrued EPC warranty liabilities” which is grouped under “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and disclosed in Note 11. On another hand, the Company has a legally enforceable right to recover these warranties from the subcontractor and suppliers as these parties have contracted with the Company to assume these warranty obligations, and that the Company will also record receivables for expected reimbursement in amounts that the Company believes are probable as “EPC Warranty reimbursement receivables” which is grouped under “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and disclosed in Note 5. The EPC warranty expenses and expected recovery amounts related to warranties are recorded net in expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations on the basis that the amounts provided by the subcontractor and suppliers are a reimbursement of the Company’s costs. As of December 31, 2016 and 2017, the liabilities and receivables are not material. The related expenses for the three years ended Dec 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 are also not material.

Electricity revenue generation

The Company recognizes electricity generation revenue for company operated power plant when persuasive evidence of a power purchase arrangement with the power grid company exists, electricity has been generated and been transmitted to the grid and the electricity generation records are reconciled with the grid companies, the price of electricity is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Note that the Company is entitled to the feed-in tariff(s) (FIT) that the government guaranteed and subsidized electricity sale price at which solar power projects can produce green energy. The Company recognizes the FIT as part of the electricity generation revenue when the entitlement to receipt of such FIT is fulfilled.

Revenue from green certificates

The Company receives green energy certificates based on electricity generated from the power plants in a subsidiary. The Company sells these certificates to buyers who can then meet the mandatory government quota per year for green energy produced. The Company believes that these green certificates are government incentive and the sale of green energy certificates does not fall into derivative and lease accounting scope. The Company recognizes revenue for the sale in accordance with ASC 605-10-S99-1 when persuasive evidence of a green certificate purchase arrangement with the buyer exists, green certificates have been delivered to the buyer, the price of total green certificates sold is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

F-17 

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, revenue from green certificates were $ 1,534,297, $ 1,708,163 and $ 4,184,724, respectively, and are included in electricity generation revenue.

Value added tax (“VAT”)

Value added tax (“VAT”) at a differentiated rates on invoice amount is collected on behalf of tax authorities in respect of the different types of revenues and is not recorded as revenue. VAT paid for purchases, net of VAT collected from customers, is recorded as an asset.

 

(s) Deferred project revenue

 

Deferred project revenue was $nil$32,242,995 and $32,376,386 at$20,791,918 on December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, respectively, and mainly represented customer payments received or customer billings made under the terms of solar power project related sales contracts for which all revenue recognition criteria for real estate transactions have not yet been met. The associated solar power project related costs are included as deferred project costs. The Company classifies such amounts as current or noncurrent depending on when all revenue recognition criteria are expected to be met, consistent with the classification of the associated deferred project costs.

 

(t) Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues consists of production related costs including costs of silicon raw materials, consumables, direct labor, overhead costs, depreciation of plant and equipment, contractor and processing fees. Shipping and handling costs incurred on sale of products and included in sales and marketing expense were $36,678,733,$55,474,721and $34,734,098 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

F-18

(u) Research and development

Costs related to the design, formulation and testing of new products or process alternatives are included in research and development expenses. Research and development costs are expensed when incurred.

(v) Warranty expenses

The Company’s solar modules are typically sold with25year warranties against specified declines in the initial minimum power generation capacity at the time of delivery. The Company also provides warranties for solar modules against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five or ten years from the date of sale. Warranty cost is accrued at the point the related module revenue is recognized. Due to the limited solar module manufacturing history, the Company does not have a significant history of warranty claim. Cost of warranties is estimated based on an assessment of the Company’s and competitors’ accrual history, industry-standard testing, estimates of failure rates from quality review and other assumptions that are considered to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual warranty costs are accumulated and charged against accrued warranty liability. To the extent that actual warranty cost differs from the estimates, the Company will prospectively revise the accrual rate. As such estimates are subjective, the Company will continue to analyze its claim history and the performance of its products and compare against its competitors, industry data for warranty claims, and other assumptions, such as academic research, to determine whether its accrual is adequate. The Company has adopted a warranty accrual rate of 1.0% of PV module revenues, based on its assessment of industry norms which also represents the Company's best estimate to date. Should it begin to experience warranty claims differing from its accrual rate, the Company would prospectively revise the warranty accrual rate.From the first quarter of 2014, we reclassified warranty expenses from cost of revenues to selling expenses, to better reflect our global OEM business operations and align our accounting policy to industry peers. Accordingly, beginning from the first quarter of 2014, warranty expenses have been recognized as part of selling expenses. The Company revised downward the estimated cost to satisfy the Company’s outstanding product warranty by $3,249,623 for the year ended December 31, 2015, attributable primarily to decrease in the average selling prices (“ASPs”) for solar modules, a primary input into the estimated costs of the Company’s warranty policy.

(w) Government grants

Government grants received by the Company consist of unrestricted grants and subsidies and restricted grants. Unrestricted grants that allowed the Company’s full discretion in utilizing the funds were recognized as other operating income upon receipt of cash and when all the conditions for their receipt have been satisfied. The Company recorded $4,297,693, $4,618,498 and $3,815,650 government grants for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 in other operating income, respectively.

Restricted grants related to property, plant and equipment are recorded as deferred subsidies and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the associated assets. The Company received government grants related to property, plant and equipment and land use right of $16,819,424, $12,037,938 and $nil during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The deferred government grants as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 were $25,347,152 and $23,241,899, respectively, included in deferred subsidies and other in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company amortized the deferred grants in the amount of $988,312, $1,455,103 and $829,668 into other operating income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The Company also recognized the deferred grants in the amount of $27,843,170 and $nil related to property, plant and equipment disposed of as part of the gain from disposal of subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2014, and 2015, respectively.

(x) Other operating expense (income)

Other operating expense (income) primarily consists of gains or losses on disposal of fixed assetsproperty, plant and land use right, subsidies received from the government, and forfeitures of advances from customers.equipment.

 

(y)(u) Foreign currency

The functional currency of ReneSola Ltd (the parent) is the United States Dollar (“U.S. dollar”). The functional currency of ReneSola'sReneSola’s subsidiaries in the PRC is Renminbi (“RMB”). The functional currency of the overseas subsidiaries normally is the local currency the subsidiary domiciles.

 

Foreign currency transactions have been translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on the date of transactions. Foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency at exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Exchange gains and losses have been included in the determination of net income.

 

The Company has chosen the U.S. dollar as its reporting currency. Assets and liabilities have been translated using exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Income statement items have been translated using the weighted average exchange rate for the year. Translation adjustments have been reported as a component of other comprehensive income in the statement of comprehensive income.

 

The RMB is not a freely convertible currency. The PRC State Administration for Foreign Exchange, under the authority of the People’s Bank of China, controls the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies. The value of the RMB is subject to changes in central government policies and to international economic and political developments affecting supply and demand in the China foreign exchange trading system market. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents denominated in RMB amounted to RMB 109,951,72614,629,660 ($17,721,030)2,107,110) and RMB 34,604,501RMB19,626,332 ($5,342,001)) at3,016,508) on December 31, 20142016 and 2015, respectively. And the Company’s restricted cash denominated in RMB amounted to RMB 601,482,914 ($96,941,603) and RMB 560,065,172 ($86,458,941) at December 31, 2014and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

F-19

(z)(v) Fair value of financial instruments

Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price). The Company utilizes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value shall maximize the use of observable inputs.

 

When available, the Company measures the fair value of financial instruments based on quoted market prices in active markets, valuation techniques that use observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. Pricing information the Company obtains from third parties is internally validated for reasonableness prior to use in the consolidated financial statements. When observable market prices are not readily available, the Company generally estimates the fair value using valuation techniques that rely on alternate market data or inputs that are generally less readily observable from objective sources and are estimated based on pertinent information available at the time of the applicable reporting periods. In certain cases, fair values are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may fluctuate as economic and market factors vary and the Company’s evaluation of those factors changes. Although the Company uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. In these cases, a minor change in an assumption could result in a significant change in its estimate of fair value, thereby increasing or decreasing the amounts of the Company’s consolidated assets, liabilities, equity and net income or loss. See Note 8, “Fair Value Measurements”, for further details.

F-18 

  

(aa) Derivative financial instruments

The Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange risk inherent in the future cash flows associated with forecasted sales denominated in foreign currencies, mainly in U.S. Dollar or Euro.

The Company accounts for these forward contracts as derivative instruments and recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in other financial assets or other financial liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not offset the carrying amounts of derivatives with the same counterparty.

The Company's derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Accordingly, gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of derivative instruments are recognized as (gain) loss on derivatives, net, in the consolidated income statement.

Net (gains) losses recognized on derivative instruments from foreign currency forward exchange contracts were $(633,964), $(6,057,941) and $6,030,915 in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts with a total notional amount of$22,883,760.

(ab)(w) Earnings (loss) per share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income attributable to holders of common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares.

 

(ac)(x) Share-based compensation

The Company recognizes expenses for services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award as determined by the Black-Scholes option pricing model, net of estimated forfeitures. The estimated compensation cost is recognized ratably over the period the grantee is required to provide services per the conditions of the award. See Note 15,14, “Share Based Compensation”, for further details.

 

(ad)(y) Comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income is the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-shareholder sources and included net income and foreign currency translation adjustments. As of December 31, 2013, 20142016 and 2015,2017, accumulated other comprehensive income was comprised entirelyrepresented of foreign currency translation adjustments.

 

(ae)(z) Treasury Stock

On September 23, 2015, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $20 million of its ADSs, each representing its twoten ordinary shares (Note in February 2017, the Company changed the number of the Company’s shares represented by each American Depositary Share (“ADS”) from two (2) shares to ten (10) shares) in aggregate value of its outstanding ordinary shares through open market or private transactions during the twelve months period ending in September, 2016, depending on market condition.


As of

In the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 807,388161,477 ADSs, representing 1,614,776 ordinary shares, on the open market for total cash consideration of $812,184 as treasury stock. As of December 31, 2015 the Company cancelled all the treasury stock.

In September 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors decided to extend the share repurchase program for another 12 months ending September 2017.

In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 280,429 ADSs, representing 2,804,286 ordinary shares, on the open market for total cash consideration of $1,493,352 as treasury stock.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had cancelled 1,352,586 of the treasury stock from the 2016 repurchase and in 2017 cancelled the remaining 1,451,700 shares of the treasury stock. There was no outstanding treasury stocks as of December 31, 2017.

 

(af)(aa) Concentrations of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, notes receivable, accounts receivable, and advances to suppliers.suppliers and other receivables. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions with high-credit ratingsgood reputation and quality. The Company conducts credit evaluations of customers and generally does not require collateral or other security from its customers. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful receivables mainly based on the age of receivables and factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of the suppliers’ financial conditions. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security against such suppliers; however, it maintains a reserve for potential credit losses. Such losses have historically been within management’s expectations.

 

(ag)(ab) Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or "FASB"(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updates (or "ASU")ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), to clarify” a new standard on revenue which will supersede the principles of recognizing revenue and create common revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” which delays the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. The FASB also agreed to allow entities to choose to adopt the standard as of the original effective date. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the implementation guidance between U.S. GAAPon principal versus agent considerations. Further, in 2016, the FASB issued five amendments to the new standard. The new standard, as amended, sets forth a single comprehensive model for recognizing and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Anreporting revenues. The new guidance requires the Company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity hasexpects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance requires the optionCompany to apply the provisionsfollowing steps: (1) identify the contract with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation. The standard also requires additional financial statement disclosures that will enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of ASU 2014-09 either retrospectivelyrevenues and cash flows relating to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying thiscustomer contracts. The standard recognized at the date of initial application. ASU 2014-09 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2016, and early31, 2017. Early adoption is permitted but not permitted. In August, 2015,before periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017. The Company expects to adopt the FASB updated thisstandard starting January 1, 2018. The standard allows for two methods of adoption: the full retrospective adoption, which requires the standard to ASU 2015-14, the amendments in this Update defer the effective date of Update 2014 -09, that the Update should be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and earlier application is permitted onlyeach prior period presented, or the modified retrospective adoption, which requires the cumulative effect of adoption to be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.adoption. The Company anticipates adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method.

F-19 

The Company expects this adoption to primarily affect certain solar power project sales arrangements currently accounted for under ASC 360-20, which requires the Company to evaluate whether such arrangements have any forms of continuing involvement that may affect the revenue or profit recognition of the transactions, including arrangements with prohibited forms of continuing involvement requiring the Company to reduce the potential profit on a project sale by the maximum exposure to loss, variable considerations for energy performance guarantees, minimum electricity end subscription commitments for sales of project asset rights . The Company is still in the process of assessingidentifying and evaluating all of its contracts with customers, and comparing the potential financial impactrequirements of the adoption will have tonew standard with its current accounting policies. This includes an analysis of, among other things: the Company.

In February 2015,timing of revenue recognition, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 modifies existing consolidation guidance related to (i) limited partnerships and similar legal entities, (ii) the evaluationallocation of variable interestsvalue for fees paid to decision makers or service providers, (iii) the effect of feeperformance obligations that might be bundled within contractual arrangements, and related partiesthe method of recording revenue on a gross vs. net basis. Further, the primary beneficiary determination, and (iv) certain investment funds. These changes are expected to limitCompany is evaluating whether any revenue-related costs for commissions, customer acquisition or similar costs, variable considerations would be affected by the number of consolidation models and place more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted.new standard. The Company is still inalso evaluating the process of assessing the potential financial impact to the Company.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03 as part of its simplification initiative. Under the ASU, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The requirementadditional required disclosure, including disaggregation of revenue, under the new standard. With the analysis performed to present debt issuance costs as a direct reductiondate, the Company anticipates that ASU 2014-09, which supersedes the real estate sales guidance under ASC 360-20, will not result in material earlier recognition of revenue and profit. In addition, the related debt liability (rather than as an asset) isCompany expects revenue recognition for other sales arrangements, to remain materially consistent with the presentation of debt discounts under U.S. GAAP. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15 related with the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements, under which the SEC staff stated it would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The impact of the adoption of the ASU to the Company's consolidated financial statements will be limited to balance sheet classification only.

In July, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 as part of its simplification initiative. The ASU changes the way of measurement on inventory, which currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The amendments in this Update require an entity to measure inventory within the scope of this Update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The Company is still in the process of assessing the potential financial impact the adoption will have to the Company.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-17 as part of its simplification initiative. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this Update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The Company is still in the process of assessing the potential financial impact the adoption will have to the Company.current practice.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10)-Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 changes how entities measure certain equity investments and present changes in the fair value of financial liabilities measured under the fair value option that are attributable to their own credit. The guidance also changes certain disclosure requirements and other aspects of current U.S. GAAP. Further, in March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-03 “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which provides further guidance on adjustments for observable transaction for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value and clarification on fair value option for liabilities instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017, and certain provisions of the guidance may be early adopted. The Company is still evaluatingWe do not expect the impactadoption of ASU 2016-01 willand 2018-03 to have a significant impact on theour consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases“Leases (Topic 842)". “. This update requires an entity to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and to disclose key information about the entity'sentity’s leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early application permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required.  The Company is still in the process of assessing the potential financial impact the adoption will have to the Company.

 

In March, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07,Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 (ASU 2016-09), “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)”, which eliminatessimplifies several aspects of the requirement to retroactively adoptaccounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublic entities, including the equity method of accounting. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interestaccounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the investee tostatement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adopt is permitted. The Company has adopted the current basisstandard in the first quarter of 2017 and assessed that there’s no material impact of the investor’s previously held intereststandard on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), to provide financial statement users with more useful information about expected credit losses. ASU 2016-13 also changes how entities measure credit losses on financial instruments and adopt the equity methodtiming of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. The amendments in this Updatewhen such losses are recorded. ASU 2016-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence that result in the2019, and early adoption of the equity method. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is in the process ofpermitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidanceASU 2016-13 will have on theour consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

  

In MarchAugust, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, which amendsAccounting Standards Update No. 2016-15 (ASU 2016-15), “Statement of Cash Flows”. The new guidance is intended to reduce the principal-versus-agent implementation guidancediversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and illustrationscash payments are presented and classified in the Board's new revenue standard (ASC 606)statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

F-20 

In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16 (ASU 2016-16), “Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”. The amendments in this update clarifynew guidance requires that entities recognize the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. When another party, along withincome tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the reporting entity,transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is involved in providing goods or servicessold to a customer, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (as a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (as an agent).outside party. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period (as of the first interim period if an entity issues interim financial statements). The new guidance requires adoption on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-16 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

In November, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18 (ASU 2016-18), “Statement of Cash Flows”, which amends ASC 230 to add or clarify guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-18 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard introduces a screen for determining when assets acquired are not a business and clarifies that a business must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that contribute to an output to be considered a business. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is stillhas adopted ASU 2017-01 in the process of assessing the potential financial impactcurrent year and the adoption had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) – Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, to simplify certain aspects of hedge accounting for both non-financial and financial risks and better align the recognition and measurement of hedge results with an entity’s risk management activities. ASU 2017-12 also amends certain presentation and disclosure requirements for hedging activities and changes how an entity assesses hedge effectiveness. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact ASU 2017-12 will have on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to allow entities to reclassify the Company.income tax effects of the Tax Act on items within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact ASU 2018-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements and associated disclosures.

 

3. DISPOSITIONDISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

In 2013,On September 25, 2017, the Company disposed of two underperforming subsidiaries Ningde Hengyangcompleted a share repurchase and Zhejiang Ruiyi which were engaged primarily insubscription agreement (the “SPA”) with Mr. Xianshou Li, the developmentCompany’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (the “Buyer”) for the sale of the Company’s manufacturing (including polysilicon, solar energy related productswafer, solar cell and materials, none of which were considered a componentsolar module manufacturing) and LED distribution businesses. The transaction also transferred substantially all of the Company. As such, allGroup’s related indebtedness to Li. The transaction resulted in:

1)The Company was no longer be liable for the bank borrowings approximating RMB3 billion ($461 million) which was assumed by the Buyer as part of the net assets of discontinued operations as of the disposal date;
2)The Buyer forgave approximately $217.4 million of intercompany payables owed to it by the Company; and
3)The Company issued 180 million ordinary shares (“18 million ADS”) with a fair value of approximately $42.5 million to ReneSola Singapore Pte. Ltd., an entity to be fully owned by the Buyer upon completion.

Assets and liabilities related to the discontinued businesses were reclassified as assets/liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2016, while results of operations related to the discontinued businesses, including comparatives, were included in operating activities for all periods presented. The disposalreported as loss was not material.from discontinued operations.

 

In 2014, the Company disposedA reconciliation of Zhejiang Ruixu, together with its eight subsidiaries, and Jiashan Xinlian. Zhejiang Ruixu and Jiashan Xinlian that were primarily engaged in operationdisposal gain is presented as follows.

Reconciliation of domestic solar power projects. The disposal transactions do not represent a strategic shift that has or will have a major impact on the Company's operations or financial results, thus do not meet the discontinued-operations criteria. There was no retained interest or significant continuing involvementgain:

ItemAmount in US$ million
Waiver of the Company’s payable to the Buyer of the discontinued operations217.4
Fair value of shares issued to the Buyer(42.5)
Net assets of discontinued operations as of the disposal date(133.6)
 Release of currency translation difference due to discontinued operations65.0
 Disposal Gain106.3

F-21 

Results of the components after the disposal. All results ofdiscontinued operations prior to disposal were included in operating activities for all periods presented. The Company recorded a gain on disposal of Zhejiang Ruixu of $3,358,127 and a gain on disposal of Jiashan Xinlian of $4,895,102 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

     January 1 –
September 30
 
  

2015

  

2016

  

2017

 
          
Revenues $1,165,700,510  $849,331,555  

472,568,586 
Cost of revenues  (1,000,861,822)  (747,068,354)  (457,058,538)
             
Gross Profit  164,838,688   102,263,201   15,510,048 
             
Operating (expenses)/income:            
Selling and marketing  (72,061,281)  (46,914,631)  (24,259,869)
General and administrative  (51,896,423)  (44,629,891)  (32,341,022)
Research and development  (43,905,312)  (27,286,652)  (14,715,027)
Other income  16,009,232   3,771,645   8,776,633 
Impairment loss of assets  -   (4,624,979)  - 
Total operating expenses  (151,853,784)  (119,684,508)  (62,539,285)
             
Income/(Loss) from operations  12,984,904   (17,421,307)  (47,029,237)
             
Interest income  2,836,225   2,349,791   1,144,135 
Interest expenses  (41,418,331)  (32,097,477)  (25,518,288)
Exchange (loss)/gain  (935,402)  9,945,642   (7,095,061)
Gain/(losses) on derivatives  1,941,019   4,592,125   (1,284,379)
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes  (24,591,585)  (32,631,226)  (79,782,830)
Income tax (expense)/benefit, net  (696,807)  (2,161,507)  4,748,324 
             
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax $(25,288,392) $(34,792,733) $(75,034,506)

There was no disposal

Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries during the year ended December 31, 2015.discontinued operations

  December 31, 2016 
Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents $33,371,486 
Restricted cash  95,861,139 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts  72,732,734 
Notes receivable, net - third parties  43,858,319 
Inventories  143,975,999 
Advances to suppliers-current  10,722,586 
Amounts due from related parties  13,065,625 
Prepaid income tax  1,020,676 
Prepayments and other current assets  19,315,500 
Derivative assets  2,715,736 
Assets held-for-sales  7,558,218 
Total current assets  444,198,018 
     
Property, plant and equipment, net  471,096,623 
Prepaid land rent, net  31,850,188 
Deferred tax assets, non-current  15,391,396 
Restricted cash – non current  429,706 
Other long-lived assets  15,085,774 
Total non-current assets  533,853,687 
Total assets of the discontinued operations  978,051,705 
     
Liabilities    
Short-term borrowings from third parties  595,433,960 
Notes payable - third parties  223,302,995 
Advances from third parties  21,493,334 
Amounts due to related parties  1,257,367 
Other current liabilities  53,774,987 
Income tax payable  221,397 
Total current liabilities  895,484,040 
     
Warranty  35,058,973 
Deferred gain  20,824,155 
Other long-term liabilities  865,964 
Total non-current liabilities  56,749,092 
Total liabilities  952,233,132 
Net assets $25,818,573 

Note:

The intercompany receivables of US$173.4 million due from the continuing business were excluded from the Assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations table above.

F-22 

 

4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET



  At December 31, 
  2016  2017 
Accounts receivables        
    – from EPC services (billed) $-  $7,091,310 
    – from EPC services (unbilled)  -   1,835,203 
    – from solar power project assets  8,919   7,124,003 
    – from electricity revenue generation(1)  77,029   7,184,721 
    – others  -   76,849 
         
Allowance for doubtful accounts  -   - 
Accounts receivable, net $85,948  $23,312,086 

(1)Accounts receivables from electricity revenue generation includes the receivables from the sales of green certificates.

ALLOWANCES FOR DOUBTFUL RECEIVABLES AND ADVANCES

 

Allowances for doubtful receivables are comprised of allowances for accounts receivable and allowances for other receivables. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts primarily based on factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers.

 

The Company madedid not make provision for doubtful debts in the aggregate amount of $3,658,491, $5,710,167 and $117,520 during the yearyears ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.2016 or 2017.

 

AnalysisAs of allowances forDecember 31, 2016 and 2017, no individual customer has greater than 10% of the accounts receivable is as follows:receivable.

  At December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Beginning of the year $1,821,755  $4,869,942  $7,638,434 
Allowances made during the year  8,354,950   9,526,878   2,516,554 
Reversals made during the year  (4,895,549)  (4,090,855)  (2,943,154)
Write off  (485,807)  (2,371,420)  (1,847,631)
Foreign exchange effect  74,593   (296,111)  (211,737)
Closing balance $4,869,942  $7,638,434  $5,152,466 

Analysis of allowances for other receivables is as follows:

  At December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Beginning of the year $8,695,727  $8,904,534  $9,130,804 
Allowances(reversal)  made during the year  203,101   234,898   (226,533)
Foreign exchange effect  5,706   (8,628)  (21,712)
Closing balance $8,904,534  $9,130,804  $8,882,559 

Analysis of allowances for advances for purchases of property, plant and equipment is as follows:

  At December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Beginning of the year $1,275,355  $1,306,139  $1,286,046 
Allowances (reversal) made during the year  (6,640)  12,983   769,367 
Foreign exchange effect  37,424   (33,076)  (95,084)
Closing balance $1,306,139  $1,286,046  $1,960,329 

Analysis of allowances for advances to suppliers is as follows:

  At December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Beginning of the year $4,424,649  $4,442,627  $4,459,487 
Allowances made during the year  2,629   26,263   1,286 
Write-off  -   -   (49)
Foreign exchange effect  15,349   (9,403)  (19,263)
Closing balance $4,442,627  $4,459,487  $4,441,461 

 

5. INVENTORIESPREPAID EXPENSE AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

 

  At December 31, 
  2014  2015 
Raw materials $91,045,461  $44,208,096 
Work-in-process  39,938,219   27,302,298 
Finished goods  226,377,489   121,660,725 
Total inventories $357,361,169  $193,171,119 
  At December 31, 
  2016  2017 
       
 Refundable deposits(1)          $1,821,545  $7,927,825 
 Prepaid rental fees(2)           -   1,652,826 
 EPC Warranty reimbursement receivables  -   132,007 
 Others  72,045   830,164 
         
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets $1,893,590  $10,542,822 

 

(1)As of December 31 2017, refundable deposits mainly represented refundable deposits for the bidding of the project asset construction rights.
(2)As of December 31, 2017, prepaid rental fees mainly represented rooftop rental payments for solar systems for one year.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, inventory was written down by $740,087, $808,031and $619,858, respectively, to reflect the lower of cost or market.


F-23 

6. PROJECT ASSETS AND DEFERRED PROJECT COSTS

 

Project assets and deferred project costs consisted of the following at December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, respectively:

 At December 31,  At December 31, 
 2014 2015  2016  2017 
Project assets - Module cost $10,919,092  $1,923,114  $6,822,294  $16,369,965 
Project assets - Development $10,096,329  $13,495,278   42,615,862   61,259,796 
Project assets - Others $16,024,537  $4,795,230   5,449,251   6,407,213 
Total project assets $37,039,958  $20,213,622   54,887,407   84,036,974 
                
Current portion $37,039,958  $20,213,622   48,177,416   76,556,400 
Non-current portion $nil  $nil   6,709,991   7,480,574 
                
Total deferred project costs $

nil

  $20,874,446   16,374,899   17,957,041 
                
Current portion $nil  $ nil   -   17,957,041 
Noncurrent portion $nil  $20,874,446 
Non-current portion  16,374,899   - 
                
Total project assets and deferred project costs $37,039,958  $41,088,068  $71,262,306  $101,994,015 

 

7. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

 

Property, plant and equipment, net, comprise:

 

 At December 31,  

At December 31,

 
 2014  2015  

2016

 

2017

 
Buildings $199,178,564  $218,144,388  $282,000  $282,000 
Leasehold improvement  129,294   129,294 
Plant and machinery  854,152,473   793,331,294   4,873   1,097,710 
Motor vehicles  3,132,933   2,442,337   -   50,971 
Office equipment  12,830,576   11,893,297   50,170   39,247 
Power stations  43,799,858   36,737,149   23,170,604   125,753,462 
  1,113,223,698   1,062,677,759         
Less: Accumulated depreciation  372,874,618   441,165,827   (3,354,205)  (8,388,858)
  740,349,080   621,511,932   20,153,442   118,834,532 
Construction in progress  9,948,464   8,950,138   5,147   35,824,545 
Property, plant and equipment, net $750,297,544  $630,462,070  $20,158,589  $154,659,077 

 

Construction in progress mainly represents new production facilities under constructionsolar power projects for self-electricity generation in ReneSola Zhejiang, ReneSola Jiangsu, Sichuan Renesola and Sichuan Ruiyu.China.

 

The carrying amount of the power stations is $43.8 million and $36.7of $23.2 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively and2016 was reclassified from project assets to property plant and equipment at the point it no longer met the held for sale criteria. All these power stations were self-constructed for electricity generation purpose.

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017 was $112,894,150, $90,223,634,$3,548,898, $2,400,522 and $90,112,980,$4,475,823, respectively.

During the third quarter of 2013, the Company concluded that it failed to achieve the cost reduction objectives of its ongoing technology improvement project, and as such the Company determined that it was no longer feasible to operate the Phase I facility without continuing to incur losses and recognized an impairment charge in its wafer segment accordingly. All production at the Sichuan Phase I facility was permanently ceased in October 2013. As a result, the Company recognized $194,694,559impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2013. The impairment charge was recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeded the fair value of the idled assets. The fair value of the idled assets was estimated based on two market-based analyses, including an assessment that general machinery that could be sold in the market, based on second-hand market quotations and the specialized machines and associated facilities have scrap value associated with their metal components, net of dismantling cost, freights, and relevant taxes.

F-24

 

8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company adopted ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which provides a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP, and expanded disclosure requirements about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The Company utilizes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs as follows:

 

Level 1-Observable unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2-Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3-Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2015 are classified in the categories described above based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

 

Recurring basis

 

The following table displaysAs of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, there is no assets and liabilities measured on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition:

  As of December 31, 2015 
  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
  Total Fair
Value and
Carrying
Value on the
Balance Sheet
  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Cross currency forward exchange contracts -recorded as derivative assets  56,253   -   56,253   - 
Cross currency forward exchange contracts -recorded as derivative liabilities  (29,519)  -   (29,519)  - 
Warrant liability  (577,500)  -   (577,500)  - 

  As of December 31, 2014 
  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
  Total Fair
Value and
Carrying
Value on the
Balance Sheet
  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Cross currency forward exchange contracts -recorded as derivative assets  1,688,103   -   1,688,103   - 
Cross currency forward exchange contracts -recorded as derivative liabilities  -   -   -   - 
Warrant liability  (1,890,000)  -   (1,890,000)  - 

Derivatives-The Company's use of derivatives primarily consists of foreign currency forward contracts. As quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are not available, the Company uses quotes obtained from professional pricing sources. The Company considers the credit ratings of respective counterparties in determining the impact of risk of defaults on the valuation of derivative assets. These fair value measurements are classified as level 2.

Warrant liability-The fair value of the warrant liability (see Note 14) was determined using the Monte Carlo Model, with certain inputs significant to the valuation methodology classified as level 2.recognition.

 

Non-recurring basis

 

The Company did not record any non-financial assets measured at fair value during the years ended December 31, 2014carrying amount of long-term borrowing and 2015.

The Company also holds financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets, but whose fair value is required to be disclosed under U.S. GAAP.


Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accounts due to and from related parties, and short-term borrowings are carried at cost on the consolidated balance sheets and the carrying amountliabilities approximates their fair value becausedue to the fact that the related interest rates approximate rates currently offered by financial institutions for similar debt instruments of the short-term nature of these financial instruments.comparable maturities.

 

The carrying amount of the Company’s outstanding convertible notes as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 was $94.6 million and $26.1 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of those debts was $56.0 million and $24.8 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014 and 2015. The fair value was measured based on observable market quotes and is therefore considered a level 1 fair value measurement.

F-24 

 

The Company’s long-term bank borrowing consists of floating rate loans that are reset annually. The carrying amount of long-term borrowings (including the current portions) was $73.3 million and $39.9 million of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The estimated fair value of long-term borrowings (including the current portion) was $71.8 million and $38.6million as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The fair value is measured using discounted cash flow technique based on current rates for comparable loans on the respective valuation date and it therefore considered a level 2 measurement.

  

9. INCOME TAXES

 

The Company and its subsidiaries file separate income tax benefit (expense) comprises:  returns.

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Income (Loss) before income tax            
PRC $(244,731,725) $(2,748,982) $22,416,826 
Other jurisdictions  (16,910,484)  (31,234,691)  (26,818,332)
Total  (261,642,209)  (33,983,673)  (4,401,506)
Current tax benefit (expense)            
PRC $(36,084) $-  $- 
Other jurisdictions  (2,850,524)  256,071   (218,556)
Subtotal  (2,886,608)  256,071   (218,556)
Deferred tax benefit (expense)            
PRC $3,119,511  $(4,595,374) $97,189 
Other jurisdictions  2,489,812   4,689,183   (552,249)
Subtotal  5,609,323   93,809   (455,060)
Total income tax benefit (expense) $2,722,715  $349,880  $(673,616)

British Virgin Islands

 

ReneSolaUnder the current laws of the British Virgin Islands(“BVI”), the Company’s subsidiary in BVI is not subject to tax underon its income or capital gains. In addition, upon any payment of dividends by the laws ofCompany, no British Virgin Islands.Islands withholding tax is imposed.

 

ReneSola Zhejiang isPeople’s Republic of China

On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress approved the Corporate Income Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “CIT Law”) with effective on January 1, 2008. The CIT Law enacted a Foreign Invested Enterprise (“FIE”) incorporated in the PRC. The statutory income tax rate inof 25%. Pursuant to PRC tax laws, certain subsidiaries of the PRC is 25% startingCompany are solar power generation enterprises, which are entitled to a three-year tax exemption from 2008.CIT mainly beginning from 2017 that approved by governing tax authorities and a 50% CIT reduction for the succeeding three year thereafter.


United States

 

ReneSola Zhejiang obtainedUS is incorporated in California, the approval of High-New Technology Enterprise (“HNTE”) status in 2009 and renewed the HNTE status for another 3-year period twice from 2012United States. It is subject to 2017. ReneSola Jiangsu obtained the approval of HNTE status for the period from 2015 to 2017. Sichuan ReneSola obtained approval of HNTE status for the period from 2015 to 2017. Under the EIT Law, a HNTE is eligible for the 15% reduced EIT rate.

For PRC entities, the qualified research and development expenses incurred by them for development of new technology, new products and new techniques could have a 50% super deduction in addition to the actual expense deductions for PRC enterpriseprogressive federal corporate income tax purpose. A numberfrom 15% to 35% and California state income tax of group entities are eligible8.84%, which is deductible for such R&D super deduction.federal income tax purpose.

 

The Group also has overseastax benefit (expense) from continuing operations in the jurisdiction of the United States, Republic of Singapore, Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Bulgaria, Commonwealth of Australia, Japan, Republic of India, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Republic of Romania, United Kingdom, Republic of South Africa, Republic of Croatia, Republic of Panama and Republic of Korea. The corporate income tax rates range from 10% to 40%.comprises:  

 

Sichuan Ruiyu, Sichuan Ruixin, Sichuan SiLiDe, Energy-Saving Technology, Zhejiang Academe, ReneSola Shanghai, Beijing Xuyuan, Zhejiang ReneSola PV Materials, ReneSola Kexu, ReneSola Bangsheng, ReneSola Fuyun are incorporated in the PRC. The corporate income tax rate is 25%.The corporate income tax rate for ReneSola Zhejiang Solar New Energy Academe is 20%.

  

Years ended December 31,

 
  

2015

  

2016

  

2017

 
Income (Loss) before income tax            
PRC $-  $(69,465) $2,938,038 
Other jurisdictions  20,190,079   296,039   583,861 
             
Total  20,190,079   226,574   3,521,899 
             
Current tax benefit (expense)            
PRC  -   -   (11,926)
Other jurisdictions  (34,721)  (283,829)  (222,094)
             
Subtotal  (34,721)  (283,829)  (234,020)
Deferred tax benefit (expense)      -     
PRC  -   -   1,402 
Other jurisdictions  57,912   151,737   (89,450)
             
Subtotal  57,912   151,737   (88,048)
             
Total income tax benefit (expense) $23,191  $(132,092) $(322,068)

 

There was no reversal or addition of unrecognized tax benefits during the year ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively.


The Company classifies interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, there were no interests and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2016 and 2017, there was no accrual of uncertain tax benefits recognized by the Company. The Company does not anticipate any significant increases or decreases to its liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

 

According to the PRC Tax Administration and Collection Law, the statute of limitations is three years if the underpayment of taxes is due to computational errors made by the taxpayer. The statute of limitations will be extended to five years under special circumstances, which are not clearly defined, but an underpayment of taxes exceeding RMB100,000 (approximately $15,917)$15,060) is specifically listed as a special circumstance. In the case of a transfer pricing related adjustment, the statute of limitations is ten years. There is no statute of limitations in the case of tax evasion. The Company’s PRC subsidiaries are therefore generally subject to examination by the PRC tax authorities from 2010 through 2015 on non-transfer pricing matters, and from 2005 through 2015 on transfer pricing matters.

F-25 

 

The principal components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

  At December 31, 
  2014  2015 
Deferred tax assets:        
Property, plant and equipment $1,066,226  $373,994 
Inventories provision  583,642   452,362 
Tax losses  95,506,037   81,552,073 
Contingent liabilities  880,351   843,219 
Bad debts provision  3,213,547   1,603,589 
Deferred subsidies  4,580,462   4,123,916 
Impairment for long-lived assets  49,995,931   43,366,347 
Warranty provision  7,861,035   8,925,955 
Silicon income  456,563   262,383 
Others  1,495,083   1,557,477 
         
Total gross deferred tax assets $165,638,877  $143,061,315 
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets  (145,288,802)  (126,550,971)
Net deferred tax assets $20,350,075  $16,510,344 
         
Analysis as        
Current $11,437,218  $5,988,646 
Non-current  8,912,857   10,521,698 
  $20,350,075  $16,510,344 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Property, plant and equipment $216,326  $- 
Prepaid land use right  303,643   283,980 
Derivative assets  -   - 
Total deferred tax liabilities $519,969  $283,980 
Analysis as:        
Current $69,017  $- 
Non-current  450,952   283,980 
  $519,969  $283,980 

  

At December 31,

 
  

2016

  

2017

 
Deferred tax assets:        
Accrued expenses $-  $6,254 
Tax losses  3,482,010   3,234,651 
Others  -   55,282 
Total gross deferred tax assets  3,482,010   3,296,187 
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets  (3,334,464)  (3,236,889)
Net deferred tax assets $147,546  $59,298 

 

As of December 31, 2015,2017, the PRC Companies had net operating loss carry forwards of $291,025,232,$2,017,109, of which $19,482,786, $151,854,153, $54,176,042, $64,368,732$284,543 and $1,143,519$1,732,566 will expire in 2016, 2017, 2018, 20192021 and 2020,2022 respectively. ReneSola US had net operating loss carry forwards of $15,048,673, which will expire from 2032 to 2035. ReneSola Germany had net operating loss carry forwards of $13,114,206, which can be offset in future without any time restriction.

 

The Company considers positive and negative evidence to determine whether some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of recent losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry forward periods, the Company’s experience with tax attributes expiring unused and tax planning alternatives.


The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible for tax purposes. As a result, the Company has recognized a valuation allowance of $145,288,802$3,334,464 and $126,550,971$3,236,889 as at December 31, 2014and 2015,2016 and 2017, respectively.

 

Reconciliation between the applicable statutory income tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017 is as follows:

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
PRC applicable income tax rate  25.0%  25.0%  25.0%
Effect of Tax holiday - HNTE  3.1%  11.3%  - 
Effect of Tax holiday - non-taxable income  0.3%  0.8%  - 
Valuation allowance  (26.8)%  (36.1)%  (142.3)%
Expiration of tax loss  -   (14.0)%  - 
Effect of different tax rate of subsidiaries  (0.9)%  13.5%  113.9%
Effect of future tax rate change  -   -   20.9%
Non-deductible expense  (1.7)%  (7.3)%  (65.4)%
R&D super deduction  1.4%  8.4%  44.3%
Others  0.6%  (0.6)%  (11.7)%
Effective income tax rate  1.0%  1.0%  (15.3)%

  Years ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
PRC applicable income tax rate  25%  25%  25%
Valuation allowance  1%  26%  (3)%
Preferential tax rate  -   -   (24)%
Effect of different tax rate of subsidiaries  (22)%  20%  (4)%
Others  (4)%  (13)%  (4)%
Effective income tax rate  0%  58%  (10)%

 

The aggregate amount and per sharefollowing table sets forth the effect of preferential tax on China operations for the Tax Holiday including effect of timing difference reversed in the year with different rate are as follows:years ended December 31 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively:

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Aggregate $8,943,517  $4,081,529  $- 
Per share effect -basic $0.05  $0.02  $- 
Per share effect-diluted $0.05  $0.02  $- 

In accordance with the EIT Law, dividends, which arise from profits of FIEs earned after January 1, 2008, are subject to a 10% withholding income tax. Under applicable accounting principles, a deferred tax liability should be recorded for taxable temporary differences attributable to the excess of financial reporting basis over tax basis in a domestic subsidiary. However, a deferred tax liability is not recognized if the basis difference is not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future and is expected to be permanent in duration. The Company believes that the PRC entities' undistributed earnings generated after January 1, 2008 will be permanently reinvested in the PRC entities. As such, no deferred taxes have been recorded on these undistributed earnings of the Company's PRC subsidiaries as these differences are not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future and are expected to be permanent in duration. The temporary difference for which no deferred tax liability has been recognized is $25.9 million and $34.5 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The undistributed earnings accumulated in other overseas operating entities are immaterial.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
  USD  USD  USD 
          
Preferential tax effect $-  $-  $845,010 
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations effect -decrease  -   -   - 
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations effect -decrease $-  $-  $- 

 

10. BORROWINGS AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

a) Bank borrowings

 

The Company’s bank borrowings consist of the following:

 

 At December 31,  

At December 31,

 
 2014  2015  

2016

 

2017

 
Short-term $624,871,434  $667,682,811  $-  $6,605,894 
Long-term, current portion  29,803,934   1,104,735 
Subtotal  654,675,368   668,787,546 
Long-term  43,451,827   38,776,693   28,835,700   32,513,900 
 $698,127,195  $707,564,239  $28,835,700  $39,119,794 

 

As of December 31, 2014 and 2015,2016, long-term borrowings of $28,835,700 was joint guaranteed by two subsidiaries of the maximum bank credit facilities granted to the Company were $842,670,304 and $759,673,982, respectively, of which $735,786,108 and $663,519,098 were drawn down, and $106,884,196 and $96,154,884 were available as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The available lines of credit as of December 31, 2015 are subject to annual review and renewal by the financial intuitions.Company.


As of December 31, 2014,2017, short-term borrowings of $353,549,434$6,605,894 and long-term borrowings of $ 10,532,71032,513,900 were securedjoint guaranteed by property, plantthe Company and equipment with carrying amounts of $ 617,467,925, prepaid land use right of $ 33,466,942 and accounts receivable of $ 12,948,070. As of December 31, 2015,its two subsidiaries. The short-term borrowings of $307,558,955$6,605,894 were also pledged by all the shares or ownership interests of the borrower, and long-term borrowings of $9,294,218 were secured by property, plant and equipmentproject assets owned with carrying amountsvalue equivalent to 130% of $511,097,611, investment of $188,471,367, and prepaid land use right of $34,555,805.the principal.

 

F-26 

In addition, $301,773,840 and $318,008,380 of borrowings were guaranteed by personal assets of Mr. Xianshou Li, the Company's chief executive officer, and his family as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

  

a)i) Short-term

 

Interest rates are fixed for allthe short-term borrowings are variable for certain short-term borrowings, and are updated monthly.as of December 31, 2017. The weighted average interest rate of short term loans was 5.46%, 5.75% and 5.65% in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.2017 was 6.0%. The borrowings are repayable within one year.

There are financial covenants associated with Renesola Zhejiang, Renesola Jiangsu, Zhejiang Integration, and Sichuan Ruiyu’s short-term borrowings of $397,968,894, $10,220,651, $4,554,004 and $3,087,460 respectively, related to certain operational metrics and financial ratios. As of December 31, 2015, the aforementioned four subsidiaries were in compliance with all debt covenants.

 

b)ii) Long-term

 

Interest rates are variablefixed for certain portions of the above long-term borrowings, and are updated every three months, once a year or according to a predetermined schedule.bank loans. The weighted average interest rate of long-term borrowings was 6.82%6.58%, 6.91%6.80% and 6.58%5.80% in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.

All the principals of the long-term bank loans should be repaid in 2020 as illustrated in the table below:

2018 $- 
2019 - 
2020 $32,513,900 

b) Financings associated with failed sale-lease back transactions

In 2017, certain subsidiaries of the Company (“seller-lessee”) sold material of self-built solar projects (“leased assets”) with carrying amount of $ 33,753,639 to different domestic financial leasing companies (“buyer-lessors”) for cash consideration of $ 39,535,563 and simultaneously entered into the contracts to lease back the leased assets from the buyer-lessors for 5 to 10 years. These arrangements are guaranteed by other subsidiaries of the Company and also pledged by the shares and rights for the future power generation income of the seller-lessee. Pursuant to the terms of the agreements, seller-lessee is required to pay to the buyer-lessors lease payment over the lease period and is entitled to obtain the ownership of these equipment at a nominal price upon the expiration of the lease.

As the leased assets are considered integral with real estate under ASC 360, the sale-leaseback rules related to real estate are applied. The lease transactions do not qualify as a sale-leaseback transaction as these solar projects are initially invested and build up by seller-lessee with expected useful life of 25 years, and are continuingly maintained by seller-lessee. Seller-lessee has an obligation to repurchase the leased assets upon the expiry of the lease. In addition, after the lease period, seller-lessee will keep using the assets and has no plans to sell or early-disposal.

Accordingly, these transactions are accounted for as financing transactions in accordance with ASC 840. Internal rate of return is used in the computation of interest cost. The assets remain in the PPE and continue to be depreciated.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $ 38,575,716 under long-term borrowings and $ 1,638,904 as current portion which represents principal to be paid in the next year. The weighted average effective interest rate of the financing was 6.07% and interest costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.2017 were $ 836,959. These sale-leaseback financings were collateralized by material of solar projects.

 

c) Capital lease

There

In 2017, the Company leased module, inverter and other materials from different domestic financial leasing companies. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, the Company is required to pay to the finance lease companies lease payments and is entitled to obtain the ownership of these machinery and equipment at a nominal price upon the expiration of the lease. These arrangements are financial covenants associated with MG Solar Systems EOODguaranteed by other subsidiaries of the Company and NOVE Eco Energy EOOD’s long-term borrowingsalso pledged by the shares and rights for the future power generation income of $4,385,890 and $4,908,268 respectively, related to certain operational metrics and financial ratios.the leases. The lease is classified as capital lease. As of December 31, 2015, MG Solar Systems EOOD2017, the carrying amount of the material related to this capital lease contract is $ 32,994,934, and NOVE Eco Energy EOOD wereis included in compliance with all debt covenants.

PPE that is being depreciated over lives of 25 years and the payable related to this contract is $ 29,298,799.

 

Future principal repayment onAs of December 31, 2017, the long-term bank loans are as follows:net value of the leased assets are:

 

2016 $1,156,125 
2017  31,644,149 
2018  1,189,061 
2019 and after  5,892,093 
  $39,881,428 
  As of December 31, 
  2017 
    
Module, inverter and etc. $32,994,934 

F-27 

As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments required under the capital lease are:

  USD 
    
Year ended December 31,    
2018 $2,149,749 
2019  6,071,530 
2020  6,510,005 
2021  6,670,450 
2022  6,670,450 
2023 and later  10,782,597 
Total minimum lease payments  38,854,781 
Less: Amount representing interest  (9,555,982)
Present value of net minimum lease payments  29,298,799 
Current portion  369,046 
Non-current portion $28,929,753 

  USD 
Year ended December 31, 2017    
Non-current portion for Capital lease $28,929,753 
Non-current portion for failed sale and lease back $38,575,716 
Total failed sale-lease back and capital lease liabilities  67,505,469 

 

c)e) Interest expense

Interest expense incurred for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 20152017 was $53,333,912, $49,261,829 and $43,417,785, respectively,$ 4,045,277, of which $1,225,421, $246,027 and $nil$ 108,975 has been capitalized in the carrying value of property, plant and equipment.PPE.

 

11. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

The Company’s other current liabilities are summarized below:

 

 At December 31,  At December 31, 
 2014  2015  2016 2017 
Payable for purchase of property, plant and equipment $71,283,739  $33,529,239  $2,051,958  $25,562,367 
Other payables  55,339,514   43,709,026 
Payable for lease fee of rooftops  -   2,117,606 
Payables associated with failed sale-lease back–current portion  -   1,638,904 
Payables associated with capital lease –current portion  -   369,046 
Other tax payables  59,837   229,361 
Accrued EPC warranty liabilities  -   132,007 
Others(1)  6,238,160   464,944 
 $126,623,253  $77,238,265  $8,349,955  $30,514,235 

  

(1)   The others as of December 31, 2016 mainly included the payable for the development and construction of project assets.

12. CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES

 

On March 15, 2011, the Company issued $175,000,000 of U.S. Dollar-Settled 4.125% Convertible Senior Notes(“Notes”) due March 15, 2018, which are convertible into American Depositary Shares (the “ADSs”), each currently representing two ordinary shares of the Company. On April 7, 2011, an over-allotment option up to $25,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Notes were fully exercised by initial purchasers. The key terms of the Notes are as follows:

 

Interest. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 4.125% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15.

 

Redemption at maturity. Each Note may be redeemed upon maturity at a price of 100% of principal amount plus accrued interest, if any, from March 15, 2016.


Conversion.The Notes may be converted into ADSs at the option of the holders at any time prior to maturity. The conversion price is initially $10.5473 per ADS and is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events but will not be adjusted for accrued and unpaid interest, if any. Based on the conversion price of $10.5473 per ADS, the number of ADSs to be allotted and issued by the Company on full conversion of the Notes will be approximately 2,478,833 as of December 31, 2015.

Put Options. The holders have the option to require the Company to redeem all or any portion of the Notes on March 15, 2016 (the "repurchase date"“repurchase date”), at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principleprincipal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding the repurchase date.

F-28 

  

No beneficial conversion feature charge was recognized for the issuance of the Notes as the estimated fair value of the ordinary shares was less than the conversion price on the date of issuance.

 

The embedded conversion option and put options are not bifurcated and recognized as derivatives.

 

Capped call transaction.In connection with the pricing of the Notes, the Company has entered into a capped call transaction with an affiliate of one of the initial purchasers of the Notes (the "hedge counterparty"“hedge counterparty”). The capped call transaction is expected generally to reduce potential dilution to the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares and ADSs upon conversion of the Notes. The cap price under the capped call transaction is $15.0675 per ADS, and the premium of preliminary and over-allotment option is $21,504,779 and $3,197,500, respectively. The premium was first credited to additional paid-in capital, and then to retained earnings once additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero. For the year ended December 31, 2011, approximately $88,384,000 par value Notes was repurchased using cash of $57,055,127. The related deferred issuance costs of $2,978,934 were expensed. The Company recorded a net gain of $28,349,939 on the repurchase of the Notes. As a result of the repurchase of these Notes, a portion of the premium paid in connection with the capped call facility of $861,280 was refunded.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately $68,454,000 par value Notes was repurchased using cash of $54,376,600. The related deferred issuance cost of $384,131was expensed. The Company recorded a net gain of $13,693,269on$13,693,269 on the repurchase of the Notes.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately $26,145,000 par value Notes was repurchased using cash of $25,931,219. The related deferred issuance cost of $1,725 was expensed. The Company recorded a net gain of $212,056 on the repurchase of the Notes.

As of December 31, 20142016 and 2015, the carrying value of the Notes was $94,599,000 and $26,145,000, respectively.2017, there were no outstanding notes.

 

The issuance costs of $7,156,101paid$7,156,101 paid in 2011 is amortized from the date of issuance to the redemption date, using effective interest rate method. The amortization expense was $784,456, $933,152$764,527, $32,935 and $764,527nil for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

13. WARRANT LIBILITYLIABILITY

 

In connection with the public offering of the Company’s common stock that closed on September 16, 2013, the Company issued to its underwriters, a warrant to purchase up to a total of 10,500,000 shares of common stock (35% of the shares sold in the public offering) at $6.04$30.2 per ADS (aggregate of 5,250,0001,050,000 ADSs) or $3.02 per share. The option is exercisable from September 16, 2013 to September 16, 2017. There are three ways in which the Company might settle the warrant liability: i) physical delivery of Shares, ii) physical delivery of ADS (at the election of the holder) or iii) net share settlement, if unable to register the shares in the case of i and ii. Warrants are separately transferable, and the holder can choose to exercise the warrant in whole or part. The exercise price is subject to adjustment under several circumstances and also to anti-dilution adjustments. All theNo warrants arewere outstanding as of December 31, 2015.2017 as all have expired on September 16, 2017.

 

The Company is accounting for the warrant as a derivative liability because the exercise price is subject to adjustment under several special circumstances, including anti-dilution clauses. As a result, the warrant is not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock, and as such, all future changes in the fair value of the option are recognized currently in earnings until such time as the warrant is exercised or expired.

 

On September 16, 2013, the issue date of the warrant, the Company recorded this warrant at its fair value of $12,547,500 with an offset to shareholders'shareholders’ equity.  The Company recognized a gain of$3,202,500, $7,455,000of $1,312,500, $577,500 and $1,312,500nil from the change in fair value of the warrant liability for years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015.2017.

 

This warrant doesdid not trade in an active securities market, and as such, the Company estimatesestimated its fair value using the Monte Carlo Simulation as of the date that the warrant was originally issued and as of December 31,2014each year and 2015usingreporting date using the following main assumptions:assumptions. No warrant is outstanding as of December 31, 2017.

  As September 16,  As December 31, 
  2015  2016 
Stock price $8.50  $3.20 
Exercise price $30.2  $30.2 
Annual dividend yield  -%  -%
Time to maturity  1.7   0.7 
Risk-free interest rate  0.93%  0.70%
Expected volatility  67.2%  42.9%


F-29 
  As September16,  As December 31,  As December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Stock price $4.27  $1.41  $1.70 
Exercise price $6.04  $6.04  $6.04 
Annual dividend yield  -%   -%   -% 
Time to maturity  4.0   2.7   1.7 
Risk-free interest rate  1.22%  0.96%  0.93%
Expected volatility  82.8%  83.0%  67.2%

  

Expected volatility is based on historical volatility.  Historical volatility is computed using daily pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the term of the warrant.  The Company believes this method produces an estimate that is representative of future volatility over the expected term of this warrant.  The expected life is based on the remaining term of the warrant. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities with time to maturity close to the remaining term of the warrant.

 

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of warrantswarrant liability are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs:inputs. As of December 31, 2016 and 2017, the warrant liability balance was nil.

  As December 31, 
  2015 
Beginning balance $1,890,000 
Warrants issued  - 
Fair value change of the issued warrants included in earnings  (1,312,500)
Ending balance $577,500 

  

14. SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

Share Awards to Employees

In November 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Panjian Li (“Mr. Li”), Chief Executive Officer of ReneSola America, and with Binghua Huang (“Mr. Huang”), Chief Technology Officer of the Company, to grant 40,000 and 20,000 common shares, respectively, each year for a period of five and three years, respectively, commencing January 2008. The fair value of the shares was $4.47 per share based on the market price as of the grant date. These shares do not have an exercise price and vest at no cost to Mr. Li or Mr. Huang.

 

2007 Share Incentive Plan

 

On September 27, 2007, the Company adopted the ReneSola Ltd 2007 Share Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) that provides for grant of share options, restricted shares and restricted share units to employees in the Plan. A maximum of 7,500,000 authorized but unissued shares of the Company have been reserved and allocated to the Plan, whose shares were subsequently registered and are issuable upon exercise of outstanding options granted under the Plan. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”).

 

Except as otherwise noted in the award agreements with the employee or consultant, the options can be exercised within six years from the award date, except for participant’s termination of employment or service. The vesting schedule and the exercise price per share will be determined by the Committee and set forth in the individual award agreement. In the event of any distribution, share split, or recapitalization of the Company, the Committee shall make such proportionate and equitable adjustments, if any, to reflect such change with respect to (a) the aggregate number and type of shares that may be issued under the Plan and (b) the terms and conditions of any outstanding awards. Except as may otherwise be provided in any award agreement, if a change of control occurs and a participant’s awards are not converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor, such awards shall become fully exercisable and all forfeiture restrictions on such awards shall lapse.

 

F-31

Options to Employees

From January to December 2013, the Company granted 800,000 share options to certain employees with exercise prices of $0.74 to $0.90. From January to December 2014, the Company granted 2,590,000 share options to certain employees with exercise prices of $0.74. From January to December 2015, the Company granted 1,150,000 share options to certain employees with exercise prices of $0.74. From January to December 2016, the Company granted 825,000 share options to certain employees with exercise prices of $0.74. From January to December 2017, the Company granted 1,550,000 share options to certain employees with exercise prices of $0.64.

 

Options Modification

 

On August 8, 2012, the Board of Directors approved an option modification to reduce the exercise price of all the options granted before August8,August 8, 2012 to the then fair market value of the Company’s ordinary shares underlying such options. All other terms of the share options granted remain unchanged. The modification resulted in incremental compensation cost of $774,932, of which $444,373 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2012. The remaining $330,559 will be amortized over the remaining vesting period of the modified options, ranging from 2013 to 2017.

 

On March 18, 2014, the Board of Directors approved another option modification to reduce the exercise price of certain options granted between August 8, 2012 and December 31, 2013 to the then fair market value of the Company’s ordinary shares underlying such options. All other terms of the share options granted remain unchanged. The incremental compensation cost resulted from modification was not material.

 

The fair value of each option grant, as well as the fair value of option immediately before and after the aforementioned modification, is estimated on the date of grant or modification using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the assumptions noted below.

 

  

Average risk-free
rate of return

  

Weighted average
expected option
life

Volatility rate

  Dividend
yield
Granted in 2013

Volatility rate

  0.65-0.80%

Dividend
yield

 4.5 years175.69-200.98%0%
Granted in 20141.63-1.76%4.5 years169.77-173.01%0%
Granted in 2015  1.36-1.76% 3.2 years  140.01-146.02%0%
Granted in 20161.00-1.52%3.2 years119.83-146.29%0%
Granted in 20171.93-2.00%3.2 years103.04-109.89%  0%

 

Expected volatilities based on the average of the standard deviation of the daily stock prices of the Company and other selected comparable companies in the same industry. The expected term of options represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate of return is based on the US Treasury bond yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected term of the option.

 

F-30 

A summary of the option activity is as follows:

 

 Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Prices
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  

Number of
Options 

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise Prices 

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life 

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value 

 
Options                                
Outstanding on January 1, 2015  7,401,800   0.74   2.00   -   7,401,800   0.74   2.00   - 
Granted  1,150,000   0.74           1,150,000   0.74   -   - 
Exercised  (843,000)  0.74           (843,000)  0.74   -   - 
Forfeited  (1,761,800)  0.74           (1,761,800)  0.74   -   - 
Outstanding on December 31, 2015  5,947,000   0.74   2.14   685,055   5,947,000   0.74   2.14   685,055 
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2015  5,816,671   0.74   1.92   668,917 
Exercisable at December 31, 2015  2,898,600   0.74   0.76   333,339 
Granted  825,000   0.74   -   - 
Exercised  -   -   -   - 
Forfeited  (687,000)  0.74   -   - 
Outstanding on December 31, 2016  6,085,000   0.74   1.75   - 
Granted  1,550,000   0.64   3.50   - 
Exercised  -   -         
Forfeited  (1,470,000)  0.74   -   - 
Outstanding on December 31, 2017  6,165,000   0.71   1.64   - 
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2017  6,092,175   0.71   1.62   - 
Exercisable at December 31, 2017  3,785,000   0.74   0.73   - 

 

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015was $0.81, $1.672017 was $0.72, $0.48 and $0.72$0.41 respectively.

 

Total intrinsic value of options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015was $544,888, $306,5342017 was $644,895, nil and nil respectively. Proceeds received on exercise was $644,895, respectively.nil and nil as of December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

 

Compensation cost of $1,626,560, $2,104,126$1,204,494, $692,322 and $1,204,494$783,118 has been charged against income during the year ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,2017, there was $2,108,580$1,146,076 in total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options granted under the Plan, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.451.21 years.


 

Restricted Share Units

 

In May 2014, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved a Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) award program pursuant to the Plan. The Company awarded 750,000 RSUs under the Plan to senior management executives. One fifth of these RSUs will vest annually over five years as long as the executives continue to be employed by the Company on the applicable vesting date. Each RSU represents the right of the participant to receive an ordinary share.

 

A summary of the RSUs activity is as follows:

 

     
 Number of
shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
  

Number of
shares 

 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date Fair Value 

 
RSUs                
Unvested on January 1, 2015  750,000   2.72   750,000   2.72 
Vested  (200,000)  2.72   (200,000)  2.72 
Forfeited  (412,500)  2.72   (412,500)  2.72 
Unvested on December 31, 2015  137,500   2.72   137,500   1.36 
Granted  280,000   0.63 
Vested  (137,500)  1.36 
Unvested on December 31, 2016  280,000   0.63 
Granted  -   - 
Vested  (140,000)  0.63 
Unvested on December 31, 2017  140,000   0.63 

 

The RSUs are measured based on the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the dates of grant. The aggregate compensation cost for RSUs recorded under the Plan was $136,000$323,000, $54,658 and $323,000$ 87,500 for the year ended of December 31, 20142015, 2016 and 2015.2017. As of December 31, 2015,2016 and 2017, there was $nil$ 120,342 and $32,842 in total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs following the forfeiture. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was amounting to $144,000, $85,940 and $39,760, respectively.

F-31 

Share Awards to Employees of Disposed Business

Upon the disposal in September 2017 (as described in note 3), the options previously granted to the employees who were in the discontinued operations under 2017 Share Incentive Plan shall continue to be vested and exercisable.

Accordingly to ASC 718, the Company has immediately recognized all the unrecognized compensation expenses as of the disposal date related to the options previously granted to the employees in the discontinued operations under 2017 Share Incentive Plan as the employees became non-employee after the disposal. The options held by the employees in the discontinued operations from the disposal point forward would be measured at fair value according to ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the fair value change was nil as the exercise prices of the options granted were higher than the ordinary share fair value.

 

15. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

 

In accordance with the relevant rules and regulations in the PRC, employees of the Company are covered by benefit plans established by the local government. These plans are defined contribution plans and ReneSola Zhejiang Yuhui Investment Co., Ltd. (“Zhejiang Yuhui Investment”), Sichuan ReneSola, ReneSola JiangsuBo Bo Power Engineering Co., Ltd. (“Sichuan Bo Bo”) and ReneSola Shanghai Ltd (“ReneSola Shanghai”), have contributed 14%, 20%, 20%19% and 21%20% separately of the basic salaries of its employees to such plans. In addition, ReneSola Zhejiang Yuhui Investment, Sichuan ReneSola, ReneSola JiangsuBo Bo and ReneSola Shanghai are required by PRC law to contribute approximately 19.1%22%, 18.2%, 21% and 21%18% and19.2% separately of the basic salaries of its employees for medical insurance benefits, housing funds, unemployment and other statutory benefits. Other than the contribution, there is no further obligation for payments to employees under these plans.

 

The total contribution was $14,216,614, $15,451,989$ 181,227, $ 215,981 and $11,244,297$674,100 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

16. DISTRIBUTION OF PROFIT AND RESTRICTED NET ASSETS

 

As stipulated by the relevant laws and regulations applicable to China’s foreign investment enterprises, the Company’s PRC subsidiaries are required to make appropriations from net income as determined under accounting principles generally accepted in the PRC (“PRC GAAP”) to non-distributable reserves which include a general reserve, an enterprise expansion reserve and a staff welfare and bonus reserve. Wholly-owned PRC subsidiaries are not required to make appropriations to the enterprise expansion reserve but appropriations to the general reserve are required to be made at not less than 10% of the profit after tax as determined under PRC GAAP. The staff welfare and bonus reserve is determined by the board of directors.

 

The general reserve is used to offset future extraordinary losses. The subsidiary may, upon a resolution passed by the shareholder, convert the general reserve into capital. The staff welfare and bonus reserve is used for the collective welfare of the employees. The enterprise expansion reserve is for the expansion of ReneSola Zhejiang’s operations and can be converted to capital subject to approval by the relevant authorities. These reserves represent appropriations of the retained earnings determined in accordance with the Chinese law.

 

In addition to the general reserve, the Company’s PRC subsidiaries are required to obtain approval from the local PRC government prior to distributing any registered share capital. Accordingly, both the appropriations to general reserve and the registered share capital of the Company’s PRC subsidiaries are considered as restricted net assets amounting to $849,920,907$ 9,266,177 and $864,408,242$16,000,000 as of December 31, 20142016 and 2015,2017, representing 14% and 17.5% of the Company’s total consolidated net assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively.


17. EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

Basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share have been calculated as follows:

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Net income (loss) attributed to holder of ordinary shares $(258,915,539) $(33,630,021) $(5,075,122)
Net income (loss) adjusted for dilutive securities  (258,915,539)  (33,630,021)  (5,075,122)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding-basic  182,167,908   203,550,049   204,085,041 
Dilutive effect of non-vested shares  -   -   - 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding-diluted  182,167,908   203,550,049   204,085,041 
Basic loss per share $(1.42) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Diluted loss per share $(1.42) $(0.17) $(0.02)
  For the years ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
Numerator:         
Net income from continuing operations $20,213,270  $94,482  $3,199,831 
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations  (25,288,392)  (34,792,733)  31,257,707 
Total net income/(loss)  (5,075,122)  (34,698,251)  34,457,538 
             
Net income from continuing operations  20,213,270   94,482   3,199,831 
Dilutive effects of convertible notes and warrants  -   -   - 
Numerator for diluted income per share for continuing operations  20,213,270   94,482   3,199,831 
             
Numerator for diluted income/(loss) per share for discontinued operations  (25,288,392)  (34,792,733)  31,257,707 
             
Denominator:            
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding  204,085,041   202,229,767   246,899,286 
Dilutive effects of share options, RSUs and warrants  137,500   174,137   6,003 
Denominator for diluted calculation - weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding  204,222,541   202,403,904   246,905,289 
Continuing operations:            
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations  0.10   0.00   0.01 
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations  0.10   0.00   0.01 
Discontinued operations            
Basic earnings/(loss) per share from discontinued operations  (0.12)  (0.17)  0.13 
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share from discontinued operations  (0.12)  (0.17)  0.13 

 

F-32 

Diluted earnings per share excludes 33,389,150, 30,420,950 and 18,356,267 common shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of the convertible debt, share options, restricted shares and warrant for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

  

The Company issues ordinary shares to its share depository bank which will be used to settle stock option awards upon their exercise. Any ordinary shares not used in the settlement of stock option awards will be returned to the Company. As of December 31,201431,2016 and 2015,2017 , there are 1,068,600and 125,600ordinary488,100 and 348,100 ordinary shares, respectively, are legally issued to the share depository bank but are treated as escrowed shares for accounting purposes and therefore, have been excluded from the computation of earnings per share.

 

As the Company reports discontinued operations in the periods presented, the Company uses income from continuing operations as the control number in determining whether those potential common shares are dilutive or antidilutive. That is, the same number of potential common shares used in computing the diluted per-share amount for income from continuing operations shall be used in computing all other reported diluted per-share amounts even if those amounts will be antidilutive to their respective basic per-share amounts.

The following ordinary share equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings/(loss) per share for the periods presented because including them would have been anti-dilutive:

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
Convertible notes  4,957,667   -   - 
Warrants  10,500,000   10,500,000   - 
Share options  2,898,600   6,085,000   3,491,575 
Total  18,356,267   16,585,000   3,491,575 

18. RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS

(a) Related party balances

 

Amounts due from related parties are comprised of the following amounts receivable from the sales of goods:

  At December 31, 
  

2014 

  

2015 

 
   Zhejiang Yuhuan(1) $169,244  $110,952 
Jinko and its subsidiaries(2)  283,171   - 
Total $452,415  $110,952 

Amounts due to related parties are comprised of the following amounts payable to the purchase of raw materials and others:

  At December 31, 
  2014  2015 
Zhejiang Yaohui(4) $3,433,772  $2,552,385 
Jinko and its subsidiaries(2)  135,391   124,229 
Champion era enterprises limited(3)  4,000,000   - 
Jiashan Kaiwo(5)  348   - 
Total $7,569,511  $2,676,614 

  

At December 31,

 
  

2016

  

2017

 
Due to ReneSola Singapore(1)and its subsidiaries $-  $60,370,065 

 

(b) Related party transactions

 

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, related party transactions with ReneSola Singapore Pte., Ltd and its subsidiaries were as follows:

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Sale of goods to Jinko and its subsidiaries(2)  2,884,843   2,898,698   53,538 
Purchase of raw materials from Jinko and its subsidiaries(2)  18,344,180   90,409   - 
Purchase of raw materials from Zhejiang Yaohui(4)  4,955,620   5,759,079   4,581,029 
Rental payment to Zhejiang Yuhuan(1)  3,253   3,246   5,236 
Rental expense incurred associated with using Zhejiang Yuhuan’s premises(1)  70,270   70,107   67,566 
Loan from Champion era enterprises limited(3)  -   4,000,000   3,000,000 
Repayment to Champion era enterprises limited(3)  -   -   7,000,000 
Purchase of raw materials from Jiashan Kaiwo(5)  211,235   -   - 

Mr. Xianshou Li and his family individually or jointly provided guarantees for the Company’s short term and long term borrowings totaling RMB 1,872,382,996 ($301,773,840) and RMB 2,060,000,000 ($318,008,380) as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

  

Years ended December 31,

 
  

2015

  

2016

  

2017

 
Purchase of modules from $-  $-  $33,238,377 
Purchased services related to the construction of project assets  -   -   868,158 
Borrowing from(2)           -   -   11,343,739 
Lending to(3)          $-  $-  $(1,624,261)

 

(1)Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co.After the disposal of the discontinued business in September 2017, ReneSola Singapore Pte., Ltd. (“Zhejiang Yuhuan”) is controlled by Xianshou Li, Chief Executive Officer.Ltd becomes the related party of the Company that both ReneSola Singapore and the Company are under common control of Mr. Li. The balances due to the entity and its subsidiaries were mainly modules, raw materials that the Company purchased from them.

(2)It represented the borrowings under a loan agreement between the Company (“borrower”) and ReneSola Singapore (“the lender”). The brotherslender grants to the borrower a loan in the principal amount of Mr. Xianshou Li are the founders and current shareholdersup to US$ 200 million with annual interest rate of Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (“Jinko and its subsidiaries”)1%. There is no fixed repayment schedule of this loan.
(3)Champion era enterprises Ltd. is controlled by Xianshou Li. The annualized interest rate ofIt represented the loan borrowed by ReneSola Singapore’s subsidiaries bearing no interests. There is 5%, and the maturityno fixed repayment schedule of the loans are six and three months respectively for the loans during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015.this loan.

(4)F-33 The brother of HR VP and shareholder of ReneSola Ltd is the director of Zhejiang Yaohui Photovoltaic Co., Ltd. (“Zhejiang Yaohui”)
(5)Jiashan Kaiwo Trading Co., Ltd. (“Jiashan Kaiwo”) is controlled by Xianshou Li.

 

19. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(a) Operating lease commitments

 

(a)Purchase commitments

Year ended December 31,  

At December 31,

2017

 
2018  $999,622 
2019   1,093,799 
2020   1,772,834 
2021   1,073,805 
2022   1,615,079 
2023 and later   32,016,233 
Total lease payments   38,571,372 

 

Under the terms of certain supply agreements, the Company is required to purchase polysilicon of $45,527,756 in total over the next 2 years, at prevailing market prices at the time of purchase. The quantities of raw materials governed by these contracts represent amounts the Company will utilize in the normal course of operations.

(b) Product warranties

The Company offers warranties on its products and records an estimate of the associated liabilities. Product warranty activity during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 was as follows:

  At December 31, 
  2014  2015 
       
Beginning balance $20,612,293  $31,778,365 
Warranty provision  13,076,787   8,815,974 
Revision of warranty costs  -   (3,249,623)
Warranty expense incurred  (1,350,729)  (18,132)
Foreign exchange effect  (559,986)  (1,302,638)
Ending balance $31,778,365  $36,023,946 

The Company revised downward the estimated cost to satisfy the Company’s outstanding product warranty by $3,249,623 for the year ended December 31, 2015, attributable primarily to decrease in the average selling prices (“ASPs”) for solar modules, a primary input into the estimated costs of the Company’s warranty policy.

(c) Legal matters

 

The Company is a party to legal matters and claims in the normal course of its operations. While the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on ourits financial position, results of operations or cash flows, the outcome of these matters is not determinable with certainty and negative outcomes may adversely affect the Company.

 

In June 2011, CEP Ltd., or CEP, one of our module customers, sued usJuly 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Pristine, a San Francisco-based solar project developer, to form a joint venture in the HighUnited States to accelerate U.S. project development. On December 3, 2015, ReneSola filed an Action in the Superior Court in Hong Kong for damages for breach of California, County of San Francisco, alleging that Pristine had breached the joint venture agreement. Pristine subsequently filed a sales contract. We denied CEP’s assertion and defendedcross-complaint alleging that the termination ofCompany breached the sales contract was due to CEP’s material breach ofjoint venture agreement. On March 25, 2016, the sales contract by failure to provide a letter of credit in accordance with the sales contract. A pre-trial set in October 2013 and a five-day trial set in December 2013 were held. On April 4, 2014, the High Court of Hong Kong handed down judgment and dismissed CEP’s case. Then CEP applied for the appeal and the trail was heard before the Court of Appeal on February 11, 2015. Eventually, the judgment was handed down on March 12, 2015, and the Court of Appeal dismissed the CEP's appeal.


In November 2013, Jiangsu Shuangliang Boiler Co., Ltd., or Jiangsu Shuangliang, one of our suppliers of polysilicon equipment, filed a case with Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, against Sichuan ReneSola. The arbitration involved a payment for deoxidization furnaces we bought from Jiangsu Shuangliang of approximately RMB55.7 million ($9.2 million), and a penalty of approximately RMB6.7 million ($1.1 million); and Sichuan ReneSola then filed a case to counterclaim against Jiangsu Shuangliang for the compensation of approximately RMB31.6 million ($5.2 million) in relation to the water leaking problems arising with the deoxidization furnaces Jiangsu Shuangliang sold to us. On June 30, 2015 Jiangsu Shuangliang and Sichuan ReneSolaCompany entered into a binding settlement agreement,term sheet with Pristine and certain of its affiliates to resolve the dispute, dismiss the Action and transfer 88 MW solar energy projects under development in whichCalifornia, North Carolina, and Minnesota by Pristine and its affiliates to one of the parties have agreed that Sichuan ReneSola shall pay RMB 36.5 million ($5.8 million) to Jiangsu ShuangliangCompany’s wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States. The transfer was completed on May 31, 2016. The Company has become the 100% indirect owner of the 88 MW portfolio of solar energy projects since May 31, 2016 and recorded the solar energy projects as agreed amountproject assets. As of payment for purchase to settle the original aggregate purchase amount of RMB55.7 million ($8.9 million), and this amount shall be paid by six installments by the end of 2015. On July 14, 2015 the arbitral tribunal has rendered an arbitral award in accordance with the aforementioned settlement agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded the difference between RMB55.7 million ($8.9 million) and RMB36.5 million ($5.8 million) as other operating income.

The total U.S. pipeline, 88 megawatts2017, these project assets are currently subject to a dispute with our joint venture partner, Pristine Sun, LLC. The relevant parties will negotiate and execute a definitive settlement agreement to address such arrangements within 30 days from March 25, 2016.under development.

 

(d)(c) Guarantee

 

In March 2014, Renesola Zhejiang guaranteed loan facilities from China Development Bank for Zhejiang RuixuDuring the year of $31,260,533 for 12.5 years and $46,929,392 for 12.25 years. The fair value2017, Zhejing Yuhui Investment, a subsidiary of the debt guarantee was not material.Company, guaranteed failed sale-lease back for project companies within the group with the amount of $26,755,960 for 5 years.

 

20. SEGMENT REPORTING

 

ThePrior to the disposal of discontinued business on September 29, 2017 (Note 3), which have been presented as discontinued operations for all the periods presented herein, the Company operates inoperated and managed three principal reportable business segments:segments, Wafer, Cell and module, and Solar power projects. The Wafer segment involves the manufacture and sales of monocrystalline and multicrystalline solar wafers and processing services. The Cell and module segment involves manufacture and sale of PV cells and modules, andserviceand service revenue from tolling arrangements. The solar power projects segment is a newly formed segment in year 2015 which involves solar power project development, EPC services and electricity revenue generation. Ancillary revenues and expenses and other unallocated costs and expenses are recorded in Other. Priorother.

Pursuant to 2015,the disposal of the manufacturing business and LED distribution business on September 27, 2017 (Note 3) presented in discontinued operations for all the periods presented herein, the Company further separated the solar power project segment into three reportable segments, including solar power project development, EPC services and electricity revenue generation was reported as "Other". The transactions between reportable segments relate to supplier contracts for the sales of wafersgeneration. Ancillary revenues and modules. Prior year comparable information has been updated to reflect the new reportable segments.expenses and other unallocated costs and expenses are recorded in other.

 

The chief operating decision maker is the chief executive officer of the Company.

 

The Company only reports the segment information of net salesrevenue and gross profit, to conform to the information the chief operating decision maker receives to assess the financial performance and allocate resources. There are no differences between the measurements of the Company'sCompany’s reportable segment'ssegment’s gross profit and the Company'sCompany’s consolidated gross profit, as the Company uses the same profit measurement for all of the reportable segments and the consolidated entity. Furthermore, the Company'sCompany’s chief operating decision maker is not provided with asset information by segment. As such, no asset information by segment is presented.

 

F-34 

The following table summarizes the Company’s revenues generated from each segment:

 

  Year ended December 31, 2013  Year ended December 31, 2015 
 Wafer  Cell and module  Solar power projects  Other  Elimination  Total  Solar power project
development
  Electricity revenue
generation
  Other  Total 
Net sales $1,271,561,269  $1,299,162,865  $11,509,721  $6,000,631  $(1,068,599,614) $1,519,634,872 
Net revenue $110,737,934  $5,551,742  $41,260  $116,330,936 
Gross profit $21,226,834  $92,950,381  $7,810,693  $2,149,511  $(20,874,452) $103,262,967  $20,707,899  $2,308,921  $18,336  $23,035,156 

 

 Year ended December 31, 2014  Year ended December 31, 2016 
 Wafer  Cell and module  Solar power projects  Other  Elimination  Total  Solar power project
development
  Electricity revenue
generation
  Other  Total 
Net sales $1,416,614,234  $1,311,867,301  $8,740,222  $695,750  $(1,176,420,479) $1,561,497,028 
Net revenue $77,372,737  $3,131,997  $-  $80,504,734 
Gross profit $71,483,745  $134,289,199  $3,901,264  $36,679  $(427,602) $209,283,285  $6,432,290  $800,591  $-  $7,232,881 

 

      Year ended December 31, 2015 
  Wafer  Cell and module  Solar power projects  Other  Elimination  Total 
Net sales $1,032,418,596  $1,024,331,572  $116,289,676  $1,044,975  $(892,053,374) $1,282,031,446 
Gross profit $62,884,189  $88,563,261  $22,007,895  $600,087  $13,818,412  $187,873,844 

The following table summarizes the Company’s revenues generated from each product:

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Solar modules $1,116,885,469  $1,309,008,400  $920,271,824 
Solar wafers  315,037,453   182,513,034   163,700,069 
Solar power project  -   -   110,737,934 
Other materials  51,123,492   40,975,806   61,932,953 
Solar cells  23,855,100   12,422,486   8,266,709 
Electricity  11,509,721   8,740,222   5,649,282 
Service revenue from tolling arrangement  1,223,637   7,837,080   11,472,675 
Total $1,519,634,872  $1,561,497,028  $1,282,031,446 
  Year ended December 31, 2017 
  Solar power project
development
  Electricity
revenue
generation
  

EPC

services

  Other  Total 
Net  revenue $64,837,042  $12,247,320  $25,853,288  $36,349  $102,973,999 
Gross profit $3,575,775  $7,031,670  $3,524,310  $-  $14,131,755 

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s revenues generated by the geographic location of customers:

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Mainland China $417,469,224  $227,182,419  $264,803,111 
Taiwan  85,619,124   43,696,851   34,710,699 
Australia  54,762,854   58,621,500   26,445,835 
Singapore  8,273,503   10,506,110   23,478,282 
Korea  51,907,636   21,120,646   8,765,334 
India  59,754,261   51,256,611   135,768,107 
Hong Kong  10,228,201   63,899   61,240 
Thailand  -   -   7,767,452 
Japan  67,284,375   369,369,451   298,855,541 
Asia Pacific Total $755,299,178  $781,817,487  $800,655,601 
             
Germany  155,371,123   147,261,159   53,603,098 
Greece  34,028,666   310,076   103,193 
Belgium  12,976,650   1,164,431   18,252,371 
America  236,934,758   170,717,859   50,176,517 
Italy  21,171,093   5,781,328   4,013,709 
France  49,441,441   89,635,307   3,529,467 
Spain  29,026,431   39,246,414   202,527 
Czech Republic  4,484,825   2,628,333   4,861,462 
England  73,191,279   224,990,352   242,425,493 
Netherlands  16,433,862   3,234,732   4,706,979 
South Africa  18,431,560   13,912,446   17,068,687 
Others  112,844,006   80,797,104   82,432,342 
Total $1,519,634,872  $1,561,497,028  $1,282,031,446 

Substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets are located in Mainland China.

There is no customer that contributed more than 10% of net sales for years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014. As for year ended December 31, 2015, sales to one customer constitutes approximately 11% of the total net sales.

  Years ended December 31, 
  2015  2016  2017 
China $-  $-  $67,533,887 
America  41,260   -   18,323,947 
Japan  5,719,672   9,175,391   - 
Bulgaria  3,083,823   652,559  ��- 
Romania  2,467,920   2,393,030   4,844,238 
England     105,018,261   68,283,754   7,271,370 
Turkey  -   -   4,995,648 
France  -   -   4,909 
Total $116,330,936  $80,504,734  $102,973,999 

 

21. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2015,events have been evaluated through the issuance date of the financial statements.

In the first quarter of 2018, the Company successfully rolled over $87.7acquired certain project companies from ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd. for total cash consideration of US$ 10.75 million short-term borrowings outstandingfor power generation purpose. Total net assets of the companies acquired was US$ 10.74 million. The transactions will be treated as transfer of December 31, 2015assets under common control and obtained new financings totaling $104.7 million.recorded at carrying value prospectively. The difference between the carrying value of the net assets and the consideration paid will be recorded in equity.

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2015,In April 2018, one of the Company repurchased all of its remaining outstanding convertible notes of approximately $26,145,000 par value using cash of 25.9 million.

On March 21, 2016,Company’s China subsidiaries, and the Companysubsidiary’s wholly owned subsidiary- Zhejiang Yuhui Investment entered into an investment agreement with a third party. According to sell two solar power projectsthe agreement, the subsidiary and the third party will inject cash consideration of RMB150 million (US$23.8 million) and RMB200 million (US$31.7 million) in BulgariaZhejiang Yuhui Investment, respectively. Zhejiang Yuhui Investment is the holding company of 9.7MWthe project assets in China for $5.4 million.

In Marchself-power generation business. After the cash injection, the subsidiary and the third party will own 59.87% and 40.13% of 2016,equity interests in Zhejiang Yuhui Investment respectively. Upon the completion of the investment, the Company will still indirectly control Zhejiang Yuhui Investment. In addition, according to the agreement, if the net profit of Zhejiang Yuhui Investment for the first quarter of 2018 does not reach RMB10 million (US$1.6 million), the subsidiary has made open market purchasesto pay cash to Zhejiang Yuhui Investment to compensate for the deficit. As of approximately 503,189 American depositary shares ("ADSs") under its share repurchase program using cashthe issuance date of $0.7 million.


SCHEDULE 1-RENESOLA LTD CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)

RENESOLA LTD

BALANCE SHEETS

  As of December 31, 
  2014  2015 
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $1,327,697  $10,181,328 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  -   257,933 
Derivative assets  1,678,005   - 
Deferred convertible notes issue costs-current  661,396   34,660 
         
Total current assets  3,667,098   10,473,921 
Investment in subsidiaries  254,481,281   213,430,832 
Deferred convertible notes insurance costs-non-current  137,791   - 
Total assets $258,286,170  $223,904,753 
         
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Amount due to subsidiaries $25,146,620  $84,821,631 
Other current liabilities  1,400,758   333,237 
Warranty liabilities  1,890,000   577,500 
Convertible notes payable-current  -   26,145,000 
         
Total current liabilities  28,437,378   111,877,368 
Income tax payable  93,473   93,473 
Convertible notes payable-non-current  94,599,000   - 
         
Total liabilities  123,129,851   111,970,841 
         
Equity:        
Common shares (500,000,000 shares; no par value shares authorized at December 31, 2014 and 2015; 204,846,064 shares issued and 203,777,464 shares outstanding at December 31, 2014; 203,331,288 shares issued and 203,205,688 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015)  476,765,888   477,964,702 
Additional paid-in capital  7,512,174   7,669,350 
Accumulated loss  (430,201,775)  (435,276,897)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  81,080,032   61,576,757 
         
Total equity  135,156,319   111,933,912 
         
Total Liabilities and Equity $258,286,170  $223,904,753 

these financial statements, the investment has not completed.

 


F-35 

SCHEDULE 1-RENESOLA LTD CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars except number of shares and per share data)

RENESOLA LTD

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

  Year ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Operating expenses(income):            
Sales and marketing $63,095  $71,669  $40,469 
General and administrative  4,071,692   4,180,518   2,745,035 
Research and development  27,608   9,189   - 
Other operating expense (income)  30   (2,582,694)  - 
             
Total operating expenses  4,162,425   1,678,682   2,785,504 
             
Loss from operations  (4,162,425)  (1,678,682)  (2,785,504)
Non-operating income(expense):            
Interest income  440   228   194 
Interest expense  (6,005,030)  (5,631,282)  (3,361,077)
Foreign exchange loss  905   (26,628)  (76,586)
Gains (losses) on derivative, net  (1,045,925)  7,202,205   7,784,352 
Gains on repurchase of convertible notes  -   7,048,188   13,693,269 
Fair value change of warrant liability  3,202,500   7,455,000   1,312,500 
             
Income(loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of subsidiaries  (8,009,535)  14,369,029   16,567,148 
Income tax benefit  -   -   - 
Equity in losses of subsidiaries  (250,906,004)  (47,999,050)  (21,642,270)
             
Net loss $(258,915,539) $(33,630,021) $(5,075,122)

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)

  Year ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Net loss $(258,915,539) $(33,630,021) $(5,075,122)
Other comprehensive income:            
Foreign currency translation adjustment  8,777,439   (2,533,628)  (19,503,275)
Other comprehensive income (loss)  8,777,439   (2,533,628)  (19,503,275)
Comprehensive loss $(250,138,100) $(36,163,649) $(24,578,397)

SCHEDULE 1-RENESOLA LTD CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars)

RENESOLA LTD

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  Year ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
Net loss $(258,915,539) $(33,630,021) $(5,075,122)
Equity in losses of subsidiaries  250,906,004   47,999,050   21,642,270 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:            
Amortization of deferred convertible notes issue costs and premium  784,456   933,152   764,527 
Gains from repurchase of convertible bond  -   (7,048,188)  (13,693,269)
Share-based compensation  1,514,828   2,166,097   1,466,181 
Losses (gains) on derivatives  1,045,925   (7,202,205)  (7,784,352)
Fair value change of warrant liability  (3,202,500)  (7,455,000)  (1,312,500)
             
Changes in assets and liabilities :            
Other long-term assets  305,556   (158,952)  - 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  217,601   313,310   (257,933)
Other current liabilities  (309,043)  (536,417)  (1,067,521)
Other long-term liabilities  -   (2,582,694)  - 
             
Net cash used in operating activities  (7,652,712)  (7,201,868)  (5,317,719)
             
Investing activities:            
Investment in subsidiaries  (14,400,000)  (15,623)  (33,783)
Net cash received from (paid for) settlement of derivatives  (876,730)  4,960,574   9,078,226 
             
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (15,276,730)  4,944,951   9,044,443 
             
Financing activities:            
Proceeds from exercise of share option  477,829   362,801   640,680 
Proceeds from issuance of common shares  70,050,000   -   - 
Cash paid for insurance cost  (4,551,958)  -   - 
Cash paid for repurchase of convertible notes  -   (9,809,860)  (54,376,600)
Cash paid for ADS repurchase  -   -   (812,184)
Receipt(payment) of loan from subsidiaries  (47,379,054)  11,999,596   59,675,011 
             
Net cash provided by financing activities  18,596,817   2,552,537   5,126,907 
             
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (4,332,625)  295,620   8,853,631 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year $5,364,702  $1,032,077  $1,327,697 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $1,032,077  $1,327,697  $10,181,328 


SCHEDULE 1-RENESOLA LTD CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)

Note to Schedule 1

Schedule I has been provided pursuant to the requirements of Rule 12-04(a) and 5-04(c) of Regulation S-X, which require condensed financial information as to the financial position, changes in financial position and results of operations of a parent company as of the same dates and for the same periods for which audited consolidated financial statements have been presented when the restricted net assets of consolidated subsidiaries exceed 25 percent of consolidated net assets as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year.The condensed financial information has been prepared using the same accounting policies as set out in the accompanying consolidated financial statements except that the equity method has been used to account for investments in its subsidiaries.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The footnote disclosure certain supplemental information relating to the operations of the Company and, as such, these statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.