UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549D.C.20549

FORM 20-FFORM-20F

     [   ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (B) OR (G) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

or

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year-ended JUNE 30, 2010

or

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONRegistration Statement Pursuant To Section 12 (B) Or (G) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
or
[X] Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 OROr 15(D) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
For the Fiscal Year ended JUNE 30, 2013
or
[   ] Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OFOf The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934


Commission file number 0-17863


or


[   ] SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONShell Company Report Pursuant To Section 13 OROr 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OFOf The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, Canada
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

8751 North Himes Avenue, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.,33614900-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3H1
(Address of principal executive offices)registered office)

Robert Rudman, CA, CFO,Chief Financial Officer, phone 561-779-9202, rrudman@continentalenergy.com, phone 813-387-3309, fax 813-935-8470
2311 Tradition Way, Unit 201, Naples, Florida, U.S.A., 34105

( Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Not Applicable

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Common Shares, Without Par Value

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:Not Applicable

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Registrant's classes of capital or common shares as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
There were 72,390,381122,815,381 common shares, without par value, issued and outstanding as of 6/30/10.13.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[   ] YES [X]NO

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

[X]YES[   ] NO

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

[X]YES[   ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[   ] YES [X]NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X]YES[   ] NO

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:(Check one):

[]U.S. GAAP   [   ] IFRS by IASB   [   ] Other

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.(Check one):

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:(Check one):[   ] U.S. GAAP
[X]IFRS by IASB
[   ] Other
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange.(Check one):[   ] Large accelerated filer 
[   ] Accelerated filer Act
[X]Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

[   ] Item-17 [X]Item-18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[   ] YES [X]NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. (Applicable Only To Issuers Involved In Bankruptcy Proceedings During The Past Five Years)

[   ] YES  [X]NO

Report Date:May 13, 2014

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 1 of 33





Report Date:November 26, 2010
TABLE OFCONTENTS
FORM-20F - ANNUALREPORT

ITEM HEADING PAGE
ITEMHEADINGPAGE
PART-I
ITEM 1.1 - IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS3
ITEM 2.2 - OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE3
ITEM 3.3 - KEY INFORMATION3
ITEM 4.4 - INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY9
ITEM 5.5 - OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS1413
ITEM 6.6 - DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES AND THEIR COMPENSATION1716
ITEM 7.7 - MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS22
ITEM 8.8 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION25
ITEM 9.9 - THE OFFER AND LISTING.LISTING26
ITEM 10.10 - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.INFORMATION26
ITEM 11.11 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.RISK3130
ITEM 12.12 - DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES.SECURITIES3130
PART-II
ITEM 13.13 - DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES.DELINQUENCIES31
ITEM 14.14 - MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS.PROCEEDS31
ITEM 15.15 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.PROCEDURES31
ITEM 16.16 - [RESERVED]3132
PART-III
ITEM 17.17 - [SEE ITEM-18]33
ITEM 18.18 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.STATEMENTS33
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS.19 - EXHIBITS33

---oOo---

Continental Energy Corp. 2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20F for FYE 2013Page 2 of 33





P A R TPART - I

This United States Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Form-20F filing is made as an "Annual Report""Annual Report" pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Further, the following defined terms are used throughout this Annual Report.

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These1934.These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors" that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

As used in this annual report, the terms "we", "us", "our" and "Company" mean Continental Energy Corporation, a foreign private issuer incorporated in British Columbia, Canada. Unless otherwise noted herein the symbol $ refers to US Dollars. The term CDN refers to Canadian Dollars. The term IDR refers to Rupiah, the currency of the Republic of Indonesia. The term SGD refers to Singapore dollars.

ITEM1.-1 : IDENTITY OFDIRECTORS, SENIORMANAGEMENT ANDADVISERS

We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-1 is not applicable.

ITEM2.-2 : OFFERSTATISTICS ANDEXPECTEDTIMETABLE

We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-2 is not applicable.

ITEM3.-3 : KEYINFORMATION

A.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

A.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The financial data for Fiscal years ended 6/30/08,11, 6/30/09,12, and 6/30/1013 as shown in the following table is derived from our audited financial statements as indicated in the independent auditor’s report included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The data for the Fiscal years ended 6/30/0609 and 6/30/0710 are derived from the Company's audited financial statements, not included herein, but filed with previous Form 20F AnnualForm-20FAnnual Reports and incorporated herein by this reference.

The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other financial information included elsewhereshown in the Annual Report. The financial datafollowing table is derived from the financial statements of the Company, which for Fiscal Years ending 6/30/11 and earlier, have been prepared in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”GAAP), the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the periods presented with US GAAP, except as disclosed in footnotes to the financial statements.

Commencing from 7/1/11 and for the Fiscal Years ended 6/30/12 and 6/30/13, the Company's financial statements were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards {"IFRS") instead of GAAP. The first annual IFRS consolidated financial statements were prepared for the Fiscal year ended 6/30/12 with restated comparatives for the previous Fiscal Year ended 6/30/11.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20F for FYE 2013Page 3 of 33





SELECTEDFINANCIALDATAFORLASTFIVEFISCALYEARS
(US$ in 000, except per share data)
  Fiscal Year Ended 
 6/30/10 6/30/09 6/30/08 6/30/07 6/30/06* 
Revenue - - - - - 
Net Income (Loss) (1,275(3,129(3,117(2,6031,923 
Earnings (Loss) Per Share – Basic (0.02(0.05(0.05(0.040.03 
Earnings (Loss) Per Share – Diluted (0.02(0.05(0.05(0.040.03 
Dividends per Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 
Weighted Average Number of Shares (000’s) 70,045 69,163 67,807 59,325 56,661 
Working Capital (185528 3,159 1,565 2,287 
Oil and Gas Properties 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 
Mineral Properties 0 0 0 0 0 
Long Term Debt 0 0 0 0 0 
Shareholders Equity (deficiency) (166566 3,245 1,653 2,357 
Total Assets 119 636 3,298 1,764 2,517 
US GAAP Shareholders' Equity (deficiency) (166566 3,245 1,653 2,357 
US GAAP Net Income (Loss) (1,275(3,129(3,117(2,6031,923 
US GAAP Net (Loss) per Share Basic (0.02(0.05(0.05(0.040.03 
US GAAP Net (Loss) per Share Diluted (0.02(0.05(0.05(0.040.03 
US GAAP Weighted Avg No. of Shares (000's)  70,045 69,163 67,807 59,325 56,661 

*Note:The Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/06 is for a period of 11 months due to a change in fiscal year-end.

How Earnings Per Share Are Calculated- Under Canadian GAAP the calculation of basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year as well as excluding any common stock equivalents that may be outstanding, if such common stock equivalents are not anti-dilutive. This weighted average number of common shares outstanding includes any shares that remain in escrow that are contingently cancelable, that may be earned out based on the Company incurring a certain amount of exploration and development expenditures. Under US GAAP, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding excludes any shares that remain in escrow that are contingently cancelable, but may be earned out based on the Company incurring a certain amount of exploration and development expenditures.

How Reported Ratios Are Calculated- The Company has not calculated and is not reporting any ratio of earning to fixed charges, to combined fixed charges or to any dividends and has not calculated and reported any other ratios, other than earnings per share as set forth above, in this report;Annual Report; and hence no basis for such calculation is included.

The selected financial data set forth in the following table should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR LAST FIVE FISCAL YEARS
  For Last 5 Fiscal Years Ended 
In US$ 000's, except for shares data*6/30/13*6/30/12**6/30/116/30/10

6/30/09

Revenue----

-

Net Income (Loss)(700)(1,847)(1,894)(1,275)

(3,129)

Earnings (Loss) Per Share – Basic(0.01)(0.02)(0.03)(0.02)

(0.05)

Earnings (Loss) Per Share – Diluted(0.01)(0.02)(0.03)(0.02)

(0.05)

Dividends per Share----

-

Weighted Average Number of Shares (000’s)101,94781,08672,39070,045

69,163

Working Capital(745)(278)(822)(185)

528

Oil and Gas Properties-0.0010.0010.001

0.001

Long Term Debt----

-

Shareholders Equity (deficiency)179(149)(803)(166)

566

Total Assets89729844119

636

US GAAP Shareholders' Equity (deficiency)n/a*n/a*n/a**(166)

566

US GAAP Net Income (Loss)n/a*n/a*n/a**(1,275)

(3,129)

US GAAP Net (Loss) per Share Basicn/a*n/a*n/a**(0.02)

(0.05)

US GAAP Net (Loss) per Share Dilutedn/a*n/a*n/a**(0.02)

(0.05)

US GAAP Weighted Avg No. of Shares (000's)n/a*n/a*n/a**70,045

69,163

Notes:* Stated in accordance with IFRS.
** Restated in accordance with IFRS on 7/1/12.

Foreign Currency Exchange- The Company's financial statements are stated in US Dollars ("$" or "US$"), and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP; nevertheless, the financial statements conform in all material respects with US GAAP, except as disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements.. The Company transacts most of its business in US Dollars but has some expenditures and deposits denominated in threefive other currencies;currencies: Canadian Dollars (“CDN”), Indonesian Rupiah (“IDR”IDR"), CanadianSingapore Dollars (“CDN”SGD”), Malaysian Ringgit ("MYR"), and Singapore Dollars (“SGD”Norwegian Krone ("NOK"). The following table sets forth the rate of exchange for these currencies upon the last trading day at the end of the 5 most recently completed fiscal yearsFiscal Years and at the most recently completed calendar month preceding the Report Date.

FOREIGNCURRENCYEXCHANGERATES
Equal to One US Dollar
 CDNIDRSGD
Month Ended 10/31/10 1.02118,9361.2967
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/10 1.05049,0631.3984
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/09 1.156610,2101.4477
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/08 1.01869,2201.3608
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/07 1.13309,0101.5319
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/06 1.15889,2621.5834
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES
Equal to One US Dollar
 CDNIDRSGDMYRNOK
Month Ended 03/31/141.122911,2991.27203.26135.9861
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/131.04879,9011.27083.18296.0718
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/121.01669,3851.26543.17175.9582
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/111.03708,5701.22763.07895.3886
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/101.05049,0631.39843.42346.5142
Fiscal Year Ended 06/30/091.156610,2101.44773.47659.0258

B.  CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS.

B.CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS.

We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-3.B is not applicable.

C.  REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-3.C is not applicable.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20F for FYE 2013Page 4 of 33





D.  RISK FACTORS.

D.RISK FACTORS.

Much of the information contained in this annual report includes or is based on estimates, projections or other “forward looking” statements. Such forward looking statements include any projections or estimates made by our Company and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Such estimates, projections or other forward looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other forward looking statements.

The common shares of our Company are considered speculative. You should carefully consider the following risks and uncertainties in addition to other information in this annual report in evaluating our Company and our business before purchasing our common shares. Our business operatingprospects as an emerging international energy producer, our ongoing operations at a particular project, or our overall financial condition could be harmed due to any of the following risks:

Nature of the Exploration Business- The nature of the Company's business, oil and gas exploration, places the entire foundation of the enterprise in a high-risk category. Oil and gas exploration involves a very high degree of risk. There is no assurance that expenditures to be made, as intended by the Company on exploration or "wildcat" drilling of its properties will result in any discoveries of oil and gas in commercially exploitable quantities. The marketability of any oil and gas actually discovered will be affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company including availability of a market for gas, oil and gas market price fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of transport and processing equipment, additional financing and government regulation. Drilling and production operations involve risks including blowouts, oil spills and fires (each of which could result in damage to or destruction of wells, production facilities or other properties, o r injury to persons). Completion of a well does not assure a profit on the investment or recovery of drilling, completion and operating costs. In addition, drilling hazards or environmental damage could greatly increase the cost of operations, and various field operating conditions may adversely affect the Company's production from successful wells. Specific risk factors are described below:

Competitive Risk- Competition among oil companies for quality properties and limited amounts of drilling
a)     

Competitive Risk- Competition among international energy producing companies for quality international oil, gas, and electricity production properties; for reliable joint venture partners; and for limited amounts of new development capital is intense.

Partner Risk- The Company does not currently manage operations of its resource properties. Management and operatorship of each property is the responsibility of one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, partially owned joint venture companies, or joint venture partners. The degree of control over direct management of each property exerted by the Company is largely dependent upon the amount of participating interest held by the Company in the subsidiary, joint venture company, or joint venture in proportion to that held by other interest holders. Other factors affecting the degree of Company’s direct control include the number of Company designated directors on the boards of the subsidiaries and affiliates and the provisions of any applicable joint venture agreements or shareholders agreements in effect. Any number of risks beyond the control of the Company could have a detrimental effect on the Company's joint venture partners and cause them to be u nable to fund their own share of costs or meet their share of commitments. In such case there is a high degree of risk that the Company would not be able to take up and pay a failed partner's share of costs and the Company's own interest may thereby be detrimentally affected.

Minority Shareholding Risks- The Company often holds minority interests in its oil and gas properties and this level of interest offers only very limited degree of management control or influence by the Company. The Company owns a minority stake of 18% in its flagship property the Bengara-II Block. Although the Company has rights to appoint a director to the board of the minority owned subsidiary who owns the Bengara-II Block, the director may be outvoted. In the event of a disputed management action endorsed by other, majority, or controlling shareholders, this lack of management control could have a detrimental effect upon the value of the Company’s interests.

Financing Risks- The Company is not generating income or revenue, has generated losses to date and does not presently have sufficient financial resources to undertake by itself all of its planned acquisitions or to fund its contractual commitments. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern depends upon its ability to obtain financing. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to extend or defer its contractual work commitments in the event sufficient funds are not available. It is possible that prolonged inability of the Company to fund its commitments could result in a loss of some or all of its interest. Management is pursuing all available options to raise working capital and funds for its various projects. There can be no assurance that the management will be successful.

Liquidity Risk- The future development of the properties of the Company and acquisition of new properties shall depend upon the ability of the Company to finance through the joint venturing of projects, debt financing, equity financing or other means. The Company intends to raise required additional funds by selling equity or debt securities, until it develops or acquires cash flow from operations. While the Company has been successful in raising the necessary funds in the past, there can be no assurance it can continue to do so. If such funds cannot be secured, the Company will be forced to curtail its exploration/development efforts to a level for which funding can be secured. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining such financing. This situation could be exacerbated by acts of international terrorism or unforeseen political disturbances. Material increases or decreases in the Company's liquidity are substantially determined by th e success or failure of its exploration programs or the acquisition of new properties and projects.

b)

Political Risk- The Company's business activities and investments are all located out of its home jurisdiction of Canada and are subject to the political risks of foreign investment. These include potential changes in laws affecting foreign ownership, contract and area tenure, government participation, taxation, royalties, duties, rates of exchange and exchange controls. Any new government policies adverse to the Company could include a change in crude oil pricing policy, expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions and contracts, taxation policies, foreign exchange and repatriation restrictions, international monetary fluctuations and currency controls. Direct and indirect effects of the decline in value of the local currency have included high levels of domestic inflation, reductions in employment, high interest rates, unavailability of traditional sources of financing, and an overall contraction in production and income levels. These conditions have affected and may continue to affect the operating environment in a particular country, as well as the cost and availability of financing for natural resources development efforts. The normal economic conditions in any country may sustain shocks that exacerbate adverse economic conditions and such shocks could originate from various sources, including social unrest, terrorism, Islamic fundamentalism, secessionist provinces, lack of government effectiveness due to political uncertainty, or policy initiatives adverse to foreign investment.

c)     

Minority Shareholding Risks- The Company from time to time holds only a minority or similar non-controlling share holding interest in a partially owned subsidiary company which in turn owns and operates a particular project, property, business, and/or investment. In such cases the Company may exert no direct management control and have only very limited influence on decisions which may impact the performance of such partially owned subsidiary. This lack of direct management control could have a detrimental effect upon the value of the Company’s interests.

d)     

JV Operator Risk- It is customary in the international oil and gas exploration and production business to share geological and engineering risks through partnerships with other oil companies through a Joint Venture ("JV") arrangement under a joint operating agreements. One member of the JV group, usually the one with the largest interest, is the designated "Operator" for the JV and conducts all management of operations on the property or project on behalf of the group. The Company's degree of influence and control over the Operator and the JV is directly proportional to the amount of participating interest held by the Company in proportion to that held by other interest holders. Annual budgets and major expenditures are authorized by the JV group members voting according to their respective percentage holding of the JV. In any case where the Company holds less than a voting control interest in the JV, the Company is at risk of being forced into contributing its shares of costs on activities it does not want to pursue or giving up some portion of its interest in the entire JV if it elects not to pay its share or fails to pay its share, as may be provided for under the terms of the joint operating agreement.

e)     

JV Partner Risk- Any number of risks beyond the control of the Company could have a detrimental effect on the Company's JV partners, including the JV Operator and cause them to be unable to fund their own share of JV costs or meet their share of JV commitments. In such case there is a high degree of risk that the Company would not be able to take up and pay a failed partner's share of JV costs and the Company's own JV interest may thereby be detrimentally affected.

f)     

Geological Risk- From time to time the Company participates in exploration for new oil and gas accumulations or it evaluates the availability of sufficient water, wind, or geothermal resources to justify a possible alternative energy development. Each of these activities involves a high degree of geological risk. There is no assurance that expenditures to be made by the Company in the search for such resources will result in any discoveries of sufficient resources of a quantity to justify or sustain a commercial development.

g)     

Transport Risk- The marketability of any oil, gas, or electrical power which the Company may produce may be affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company. These factors may determine whether a new project is commercially viable at all, and include the proximity and capacity of existing pipelines, storage capacity, power transmission lines, and the locations of principal off-takers or markets.

h)

Operating Risks- Oil, gas, and electricity production operations involve risks normally incident to such heavy industrial activities, including fires, spills, equipment failure, accidents, and well blowouts. Any of these hazards could result in damage to, or destruction of, our facilities or properties. Such hazards could also injure persons or adversely affect the environment. Dealing with such damage could greatly increase the cost of operations and detrimentally effect our financial condition.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20F for FYE 2013Page 5 of 33





i)     

Environmental Risks- Environmental standards imposed by federal, state, or local authorities of the countries in which we conduct our business activities may be changed and such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us. Additionally, we may be subject to liability for pollution or other environmental damages which we may elect not to insure against due to prohibitive premium costs and other reasons. We may become subject to liability for pollution or hazards against which we cannot adequately insure or which we may elect not to insure. Incurring any such liability may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operations.

j)     

Health and Safety Risks- Many of our business activities are subject to health and safety standards imposed by federal, state, or local authorities of the countries in which we conduct our business activities. We may become subject to claims for liability for injuries or deaths to our workers or others against which we cannot adequately insure or which we may elect not to insure. Incurring any such liability may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operations.

k)     

Title Risk- We have or may acquire leases, rights or other property associated with our projects, but the property may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, or transfers which have not been recorded or detected through our due diligence searches. We believe our interests are valid, but this is no guarantee against possible claims. If title to property associated with our projects is challenged, we may have to expend funds defending any such claims and our ownership interest therein may be detrimentally effected if we lose.

l)     

Price Volatility Risks- During the past few years world oil and gas prices have undergone an unprecedented rise followed closely by a precipitous decline. Skyrocketing demand in emerging markets has driven electricity prices to record highs in many localities. This price volatility has substantial impact upon the international oil and gas and energy business and the Company's business in particular. The nature of the impact and its future effect upon the Company is almost impossible to determine with any degree of confidence. Continued volatility of oil, gas, and electricity prices adds substantial risk to the Company's efforts to plan, budget, or forecast its business activities. Price volatility may contribute to an inability of the Company to repay any debt or pay any obligations on its projects which could have serious and material adverse consequences on the Company.

m)     

Currency/Exchange Rate Risk- Many of the financial obligations and commitments the Company from time to time undertakes in its international energy business are denominated in US Dollars. A substantial amount of the Company's business transactions are and may be denominated in other currencies. Fluctuations in these currencies may have a substantial effect on the Company’s financial statements due to related gains or losses due to exchange rate changes. The Company does not hedge and engage in other strategies to protect itself from adverse fluctuations in the respective exchange rate. Significant variations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on the ability of the Company to meet its obligations.

n)     

Financing Risks- The Company is not generating income or revenue, has generated losses to date and does not presently have sufficient financial resources to undertake by itself all of its planned acquisitions. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern depends upon its ability to obtain new financing. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to extend or defer its contractual work commitments in the event sufficient funds are not available. It is possible that prolonged inability of the Company to fund its commitments could result in a loss of some or all of its interest. Management is pursuing all available options to raise working capital and funds for its various projects. There can be no assurance that the management will be successful.

o)     

Liquidity Risk- The future development of the properties of the Company and acquisition of new properties shall depend upon the ability of the Company to finance through the joint venturing of projects, debt financing, equity financing or other means. The Company intends to raise required additional funds by selling equity or debt securities, until it develops or acquires cash flow from operations. While the Company has been successful in raising the necessary funds in the past, there can be no assurance it can continue to do so. If such funds cannot be secured, the Company will be forced to curtail its exploration/development efforts to a level for which funding can be secured. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining such financing. This situation could be exacerbated by acts of international terrorism or unforeseen political disturbances. Material increases or decreases in the Company's liquidity are substantially determined by the success or failure of its exploration programs or the acquisition of new properties and projects.

p)     

Political Risks - Indonesia- The Company's investments in the Republic of Indonesia are subject to the political risks of foreign investment. These include potential changes in laws affecting foreign ownership, contract and area tenure, government participation, taxation, royalties, duties, rates of exchange and exchange controls. Any new Indonesian government policies adverse to the Company could include a change in crude oil pricing policy, expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions and contracts, taxation policies, foreign exchange and repatriation restrictions, international monetary fluctuations and currency controls. Direct and indirect effects of the decline in value of the Rupiah have included high levels of domestic inflation, reductions in employment, high interest rates, unavailability of traditional sources of financing, and an overall contraction in production and income levels. These conditions have affect ed and may continue to affect the operating environment in Indonesia, as well as the cost and availability of financing for natural resources development efforts. Impediments to a return to more normal economic conditions in Indonesia, or shocks to the system that exacerbate current adverse economic conditions, could originate from various sources, including further social unrest, terrorism, Islamic fundamentalism, secessionist provinces, lack of government effectiveness due to political uncertainty, or policy initiatives adverse to foreign investment. Recent changes to Indonesian petroleum legislation could impact the Company's concessions or operations on those concessions as implementation guidelines related to the new legislation are released by the government. Increasing calls for economic autonomy among many Indonesian provinces may impact the Company's Indonesian concessions or operations thereon as local provinces and regencies receive more control over their natural resources from the central govern ment.

Oil and Gas Exploration Risks- Oil and gas exploration involves a high degree of risk. There is no assurance that expenditures to be made by the Company on its oil and gas properties will result in any discoveries of oil and gas in commercial quantities. The Company intends to participate in the drilling of both exploratory and development wells. Exploratory wells have a much greater dry hole risk than do development wells. The marketability of any oil and gas, which may be acquired or discovered, will be affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company. These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and processing equipment, rig availability and government regulation, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable production and environmental protection.

World Liquidity Crisis- As of the Report Date, the world is experiencing a financial crisis not seen during the last 75 years. Access to equity and debt capital has become severely restricted and there is no way to tell at the present time how long this situation may last. This situation affects the Company, its partners, its contractors, and its investors; adding a substantial amount of uncertainty and risk to the Company's business.

Oil Price Risk- During the past year world oil and gas prices have undergone an unprecedented rise followed closely by a precipitous decline to 40% of its previous value. This price volatility has substantial impact upon the oil business and the Company's business in particular. The nature of the impact and its future effect upon the Company is almost impossible to determine with any degree of confidence. Continued volatility of oil and gas prices adds substantial risk to the Company's efforts to plan, budget, or forecast its business activities. Price volatility may contribute to an inability of the Company to repay any debt or pay any obligations on its projects which could have serious and material adverse consequences on the Company.

Stock Market Volatility- The combined effect of the World Liquidity Crisisvolatile oil and Oil Price Riskgas prices as described above has had a huge affecteffect upon the world stock markets and most companies, including the Company have seen a severe reduction in their market capitalization. Lower stock prices and loss of investor confidence reduce the Company's ability to raise equity capital on the stock markets.

Operating Risks- Production operations involve risks normally incident to such activities, including blowouts, oil spills and fires (each of which could result in damage to or destruction of wells, production facilities or other properties, or injury to persons). Completion of a well does not assure a profit on the investment or recovery of drilling, completion and operating costs. In addition, drilling hazards or environmental damage could greatly increase the cost of operations, and various field operating conditions may adversely affect the Company's production from successful wells. These conditions include delays in obtaining governmental approvals or consents, shut-in of connected wells resulting from extreme weather conditions, insufficient storage or transportation capacity. While close well supervision and effective maintenance operations can contribute to maximizing production rates over time, production delays and declines from normal field operating c onditions cannot be eliminated and can be expected to adversely affect operating revenues from time to time in varying degrees.

q)     

Risk of Future Changes in Regulatory Environment- Regardless of their location, our properties and our operations thereon are governed by laws and regulations relating to the development, production, marketing, pricing, transportation and storage of crude oil, taxation and environmental and safety matters. Changes to regulations or compliance with regulations may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated causing an adverse effect on our Company. Further, exploration and production activities are subject to certain environmental regulations which may prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of our operations.

Key Management Risk- The Company depends entirely upon its management to identify, acquire, finance and operate a portfolio of oil and gas exploration properties through which the Company can grow and achieve oil production and a steady income. The Company's management is comprised of a small number of key employees with technical skills and expertise in the business, the loss of any one of whom could harm the Company. The Company does not currently maintain "key-man" insurance for any of its employees.

Currency/Exchange Rate Risk- All of the Company’s material financial obligations and commitments are denominated in US Dollars. A substantial amount of the Company's business transactions are and may be denominated in Indonesian Rupiah due to operations on its principal properties. Fluctuations in the Rupiah may have a substantial effect on the Company’s financial statements due to related gains or losses due to exchange rate changes. The Company does not hedge and engage in other strategies to protect itself from adverse fluctuations in the respective exchange rate. Significant variations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on the ability of the Company to meet its obligations.

r)     
Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 6 of 33 




Health, Safety and Environmental Risks- Environmental standards imposed by federal, state, or local authorities may be changed and such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us. Additionally, we may be subject to liability for pollution or other environmental damages which we may elect not to insure against due to prohibitive premium costs and other reasons. Our current and anticipated exploration and drilling activities are subject to the aforementioned environment regulations. When and if we establish reserves or enter into production, we will become subject to additional regulations which do not currently pertain to us or affect our current operations. Exploratory drilling involves many risks and we may become liable for pollution or other liabilities which may have an adverse effec t on our financial position.

Drilling operations generally involve a high degree of risk. Hazards such as unusual or unexpected geological formations, blow-outs, sour gas leakage, fire, inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor, and other risks are involved. We may become subject to liability for pollution or hazards against which we cannot adequately insure or which we may elect not to insure. Incurring any such liability may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operations.

Oil and gas operations in are also subject to federal and state laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of drilling methods and equipment. Various permits from government bodies are required for drilling and production operations to be conducted; we may not receive such permits. Furthermore oil and gas operations in the United States are also subject to federal and state laws and regulations including, but not limited to: the construction and operation of facilities, the use of water in industrial processes, the removal of natural resources from the ground, and the discharge/release of materials into the environment.

Title Risk- We have or may acquire oil and gas leases in respect of the real property associated with our projects, but the real property may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, or transfers which have not been recorded or detected through title searches. We believe our interests are valid. These leases do not guarantee title against all possible claims. The real property may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, or transfers which have not been recorded or detected through title research. If the oil and gas leases to the real property associated with our projects are challenged, we may have to expend funds defending any such claims and may ultimately lose some or all of any revenues generated from the projects if we lose our interest in such leases.

Risks Relating to our Common Stock- Shareholders' interests in our Company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share if we issue additional shares or raise funds through the sale of equity securities. In the event that we are required to issue additional shares, enter into private placements to raise financing through the sale of equity securities or acquire additional oil and gas property interests in the future from the issuance of shares of our common stock to acquire such interests, the interests of existing shareholders in our Company will be diluted and existing shareholders may suffer dilution in their net book value per share depending on the price at which such securities are sold. If we do issue additional shares, it will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all existing shareholders.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 6 of 33





s)     

Risk of Concentration of Shareholder Control- Principal shareholders, senior management and Directors have significant influence regarding share ownership. This concentration could lead to conflicts of interest and difficulties for non-insider investors effecting corporate changes, and could adversely affect our Company's share price. As of the Report Date, our senior management, Directors and greater than five percent shareholders (and their affiliates), acting together, held approximately21.2approximately36 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of our Company and have the ability to influence all matters submitted to our Company's shareholders for approval (including the election and removal of Directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our Company's assets) and to control our Company's management and affairs (see "Share Ownership" below in this annual report). Accordingly,Annual Report).Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our Company, impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving our Company or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our Company, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our shares. Employee, Director and consultant stock options and warrants could lead to greater concentration of share ownership among insiders and could lead to dilution of share ownership which could lead to depressed share prices.

t)     

Stock Option Risk- Because the success of our Company is highly dependent upon our respective employees, our Company has granted to certain employees, Directors and consultants stock options to purchase shares of our common stock as non-cash incentives (see "Share Ownership" below in this annual report). ToAnnual Report).To the extent that significant numbers of such stock options may be granted and exercised, the interests of the other shareholders of our Company may be diluted causing possible loss of investment value.

u)     

No Dividend Distribution- We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common shares and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. Our Board of Directors may never declare cash dividends, which action is exclusively within our discretion. Shareholders cannot expect to receive a dividend on our common stock in the foreseeable future, if at all.

v)     

Penny Stock Rules- Trading of our common stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)'s "Penny Stock" rules which may limit a shareholder's ability to buy and sell our shares. The SEC has adopted rules which generally define "penny stock" to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than US$5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors"investors”. The term "accredited investor" refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of US$5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of US$1,000,000 or annual income exceeding US$200,000 or US$300,000  jointly with their spouse.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 7 of 33 




The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized  risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer's confirmation.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the share that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common shares.

w)     

Limitations to Buy or Sell Shares- The National Association of Securities Dealer (NASD) has adopted sales practice requirements which may limit a shareholder's ability to buy and sell our shares. In addition to the "penny stock" rules described above, the NASD has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the NASD believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The NASD requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their cus tomerscustomers buy our common shares, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our shares and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

x)     

Indemnity of Officers and Directors- Our articles contain provisions that state, subject to applicable law, we must indemnify every Director or officer of our Company, subject to the limitations of the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), against all losses or liabilities that our Company's Directors or Officers may sustain or incur in the execution of their duties. Our articles further state that no Director or officer will be liable for any loss, damage or misfortune that may happen to, or be incurred by our Company in the execution of his duties if he acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of our Company. Such limitations on liability may reduce the likelihood of litigation against our Company's Officers and Directors and may discourage or deter our shareholders from suing our Company's Officers and Directors based upon breaches of their duties to our Company, though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit ou rour Company and our shareholders.

No USA Presence

Continental Energy Corporation - We do not currently maintain a permanent placeForm-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 7 of business within the United States. A majority of our Directors and Officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against our Company or our Officers or Directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.33





y)     

Management and Employee Risks- Key management employees may fail to properly carry out their duties or may leave, which could negatively impact our corporate operations and/or our share price. Our Company'sCompany’s financial condition and the success of our oil and gas operations is dependent on our ability to hire and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. We face competition for qualified personnel from numerous industry sources, and we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel on acceptable terms. The loss of service of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our operations and/or financial condition, which may negatively impact our share price. We do not have key-man insurance on any of our employees.

z)     

Key Management Risk- The Company depends entirely upon its management to identify, acquire, finance and operate a portfolio of oil and gas exploration properties through which the Company can grow and achieve oil production and a steady income. The Company's management is comprised of a small number of key employees with technical skills and expertise in the business, the loss of any one of whom could harm the Company. The Company does not currently maintain "key-man" insurance for any of its employees.

aa)     

Director’s Conflicts of Interest- Because we have not adopted a formal conflicts of interest policy, the occurrence of one or more conflicts could have a negative impact on our ability to raise capital and/or our share price. Some of our Directors and Officers serve or may serve as Directors or Officers of other oil and gas or mineral exploration companies or have interests in other oil and gas or mineral exploration companies or ventures. To the extent that our Company has dealings with such companies or ventures, certain of our Directors and Officers may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such dealings. Pursuant to the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), our Directors and senior Officers must disclose material interests in any contract or transaction (or proposed contract or transaction) material to our Company (see "Related Party Transactions" below in this annual report). H owever,Company. However, our lack of a formal conflicts of interest policy may make it difficult for our Company to raise additional capital because institutional investors may be unable to invest in our Company. Furthermore, we may be unable to list our shares on an exchange if such exchange requires that we have a formal conflicts of interest policy, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our shares and may have an adverse effect on the value of your investment in our Company or the market for our shares.

ITEM-4 : INFORMATION ON THECOMPANY

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 8 of 33 




ITEM4.  INFORMATION ON THECOMPANY

A.  HISTORYHISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THECOMPANY.

Name and Incorporation- The Company was incorporated in British Columbia, Canada, on May 29, 1984 under the name "Intl. Focus Res. Inc." On January 3, 1996 the name was changed to "Continental Copper Corporation". On October 23, 1997 the name was changed to "Continental Energy Corporation".

Domicile- The Company’s home country is Canada, its place of incorporation. The Company has no assets, no property, no employees, no Director, and no management located or residing in Canada. Other than legal, audit, and accounting services contracted in Canada to meet statutory requirements, the Company conducts substantially all of its business in Indonesia.

Share Capital- All references herein to common shares refer to the Company's authorized share capital of "Common Shares" without Par Value unless otherwise indicated. All references herein to preferred shares refer to the Company's authorized share capital of "Preferred Shares" without Par Value unless otherwise indicated. The Preferred Shares are not listed or registered for trading on any exchange or trading system. The only share trading market for the Common Shares is the NASD Electronic OTC Bulletin Board COMPANY.

Name and Incorporation- The Company was incorporated in British Columbia, Canada, on May 29, 1984 under the name "Intl. Focus Res. Inc.” On January 3, 1996 the name was changed to "Continental Copper Corporation”. On October 23, 1997 the name was changed to "Continental Energy Corporation".

Domicile- The Company’s home country is Canada, its place of incorporation. The Company has no assets, no property, no employees, no Director, and no management located or residing in Canada. Other than legal, audit, and accounting services contracted in Canada to meet statutory requirements, the Company conducts all of its business outside Canada.

Share Capital- All references herein to common shares refer to the Company's authorized share capital of "Common Shares" without Par Value unless otherwise indicated. All references herein to preferred shares refer to the Company's authorized share capital of "Preferred Shares" without Par Value unless otherwise indicated. The Preferred Shares are not listed or registered for trading on any exchange or trading system. The only share trading market for the Common Shares is the OTCQB under the symbol "CPPXF".

Principal Executive Office- The Company's principal executive and operational management office is located at Jl. Kenanga 62, Cilandak, Jakarta, 12560, Indonesia; the contact person is the Company’s President and COO, Andrew T. Eriksson, the telephone number is +6221-7883-2942 and the facsimile number is +6221-780-4344. The office is rented and consists of approximately 400 square meters floor space. The Company began occupying this facility in October 2006 and considers the facility adequate for current needs.

Representative Office- The Company maintainsutilizes a representative office at 8751 North Himes Avenue, Tampa,2311 Tradition Way, Unit 201, Naples, Florida, 33614;U.S.A., 34105; the telephone number is +1-813-387-3309 and the facsimile number is +1-813-935-8470.+1-561-779-9202.

Registered Records Office- The Company's registered office and records office are located, care of the Company's general legal counsel, at Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre, 595 Burrard900-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V7X-1L3, the telephone number is +1-604-631-3300.British Columbia, V6C 3H1, Canada. The web sitewebsite address is www.continentalenergy.com.

MATERIAL EVENTS OCCURINGOCCURRING DURING THE LAST FISCAL YEAR ENDED 6/30/1013

Investor Relations Advisor Engaged -Reports Filed for Quarter Ended 6/30/12 –In a news release datedOn 9/17/09,12, we filed the Company announced it had engagedrequired financial reports and other disclosure in compliance with regulations of our home jurisdiction and the services of Agoracom Investor Relations Corp. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, to provide investor relations services toBritish Columbia Securities for the Company. AGORACOM Investor Relations (http://www.AgoracomIR.com) is North America's largest online investor relations firm for small-cap companies. Agoracom has partnered withquarter ended 6/30/12, the world's biggest internet companies, including Yahoo, Globe Investor, AOL, Google and Blackberry to market their clients to a massive audience of new small-cap investors.

Financial Services Advisor Engaged -In a news release dated 9/18/09, the Company announced it had engaged the services of Aspen Capital Partners LLC of Tampa, Florida, to provide financial and management advisory services. Aspen (www.aspencp.com) is a financial and management advisory firm specializing in business growth and funding strategies, domestic and international market access, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, and strategic services. The Aspen team offers a wealth of experience in developing and implementing effective business strategies. In addition to years of traditional investment banking, operational and legal experience, each of Aspen’s principals has started and successfully grown companies of their own and has a track record of creatively solving problems through all stages of a company’s development.

New CFO Appointed -In a news release dated 9/21/09, the Company announced it had appointed Robert Rudman as acting Chief Financial Officerend of the Company. Mr. Rudman isfourth quarter and our Fiscal Year 2012. These reports were filed electronically on SEDAR and included audited consolidated financial statements for the quarter plus a Canadian Chartered Accountantmanagement discussion and a former auditor withanalysis thereof. This filing also included the firm of Price Waterhouse. He is a proven professional with more than thirty years of hands-on experienceCompany's annual reserves report for Fiscal Year 2012 in the managementform referred to in Canadian National Instrument 51-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Oil and analysis of companies. As a senior member of Canadian and U.S. financial advisory firms, Mr. Rudman has been instrumental in arranging a wide range of debt and equity financings, in structuring a number of mergers and acquisitions, in developing strategic and operational business plans, and in the preparation and filing of all required regulatory reports. Mr. Rudman’s scope of experience includes both domestic and international transactions. His focus has been on the challenges facing early stage public companies. He also serves as the Managing Director of Aspen Capital Partners LLC, the Company’s financial and management advisory firm.

Investment Banker Engaged -In a news release dated 9/22/09, the Company announced it had engaged the services of Pointe Atlantic Inc. of Tampa, Florida, as its investment banker and exclusive placement agent for private placements. Pointe Atlantic Inc. is an affiliate of Aspen Capital Partners LLC, the Company’s financial and management advisory firm. Pointe Atlantic's existing client base extends across the US including New York, California, and Florida. The Pointe Atlantic team brings over 25 years of experience in using extensive financial and operational models. Pointe Atlantic’s principals have supervised over twenty five private placements (ranging from $1,000,000 to $20,000,000) and various underwriting and have been involved in over 30 mergers and acquisitions.

Share Purchase Warrants Activity– On 7/23/09, a total of 15,000 outstanding share purchase warrants expired in accordance with their term. On 9/16/09, a total of 1,350,000 new share purchase warrants were issued as partial compensation payable pursuant to contracts with a financial services advisor and an investor relations firm. Of the total, 1,000,000 warrants to purchase common shares of the Company at a price of $0.15 for a term of 3 years expiring 9/16/12 were issued. An additional 350,000 conditional warrants to purchase common shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.09 were issued for a term expiring on 9/16/10; and the warrants shall vest in four equal tranches of 87,500 shares and each tranche may be exercised only after 1/01/10, 4/1/10, 7/1/10 and 10/1/10 unless the contract under which they are issued is cancelled by the Company prior to the vest date.Gas Activities”.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20F for FYE 2013Page 98 of 33





IncentiveBengara-II PSC Permitted to Expire- Pursuant to a news release dated 10/16/12 the Company announced that Kunlun Energy Ltd., acting in its capacity as operator of the Bengara-II Production Sharing Contract (“PSC”) and 70% majority shareholder of the Company's 18% owned subsidiary, Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd., has terminated negotiations with Indonesian authorities for an extension of the PSC's term. Consequently the Bengara-II PSC shall be relinquished and allowed to expire in accordance with its terms.

COO Resignation- The Company's President/COO resigned effective 10/31/12 to pursue other business interests.

Reports Filed for Quarter Ended 9/30/12- On 11/26/12, we filed the required financial reports and other disclosure in compliance with regulations of our home jurisdiction and the British Columbia Securities for the quarter ended 9/30/12, the end of the first quarter and first three months of our Fiscal Year 2013. These reports were filed electronically on SEDAR and included management prepared but unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarter plus a management discussion and analysis thereof.

Annual General Meeting of Shareholders- The Company held its AGM on 11/30/12 and all resolutions brought before the meeting were approved including the re-election of the Company’s four Directors and the re-appointment of the auditors for the ensuing year. In addition, an ordinary resolution to adopt the Company’s proposed amended and restated Stock Options ActivityOption Plan was approved.

New Indonesian Joint Bid Group Established- On 9/16/09,2/4/13, the Company announced that it had entered into a joint bid arrangement with another local industry player to present bids for new Indonesian Production Sharing Contracts (“PSCs”) offered by Indonesian oil and gas authorities in 2013.

Reports Filed for Quarter Ended 12/31/12- On 3/4/13, we filed the required financial reports and other disclosure in compliance with regulations of our home jurisdiction and the British Columbia Securities for the quarter ended 12/31/12, the end of the second quarter and first six months of our Fiscal Year 2013. These reports were filed electronically on SEDAR and included management prepared but unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarter plus a management discussion and analysis thereof.

TGE Shares Returned- On 5/7/12 the Company entered into an option agreement and acquired 300,000 shares of Tawau Green Energy Sdn. Bhd ("TGE") for 6,000,000 Malaysian Ringgit (“MYR”) (about US$1,965,600). TGE is a privately held company based in Malaysia and is in the business of developing geothermal energy. Under the terms of the agreement, the first MYR 3,000,000 must be paid by the 1st anniversary of the agreement, 5/7/13. The remaining MYR 3,000,000 of the investment was to be earned through the Company’s expenditures on a mutually agreed upon work program by the first anniversary of the agreement, or if not the Company must return an amount from its 300,000 TGE shares to the seller in proportion to the Company shortfall. By 5/7/13, the Company had invested a total of 1,000,000$114,769 in TGE. On 5/20/13 the Company returned all 300,000 of the TGE shares and wrote off its investment in TGE.

Acquisition of Majority Interest in Visionaire Energy- On 6/4/13, the Company acquired a 51% shareholding stake in VE. The acquisition was accomplished by an arms-length, non-cash, share-swap transaction with Visionaire Invest AS ("VI"), the sole shareholder of VE. The Company issued 20 million of its common shares, representing a stake of approximately 16.7% in the Company to VI, in exchange for 51% of the authorized and outstanding shares of VE. The principal assets of VE are its management and its shareholdings in two separate, privately owned, offshore oil and gas service providers both based in Bergen, Norway. VE owns a 49% shareholding equity interest in VTT Maritime AS and a 41% equity interest in RADA Engineering and Consulting AS.

Appointment of New Director- On 6/17/13, Johnny Christiansen was appointed to the Board of Directors. Mr. Christiansen is the Founder and CEO of Visionaire Invest AS, a Norwegian investment company which owns a 49% stake in Visionaire Energy AS, of which he is also Chairman.

CEO and CFO Appointed to Board of Visionaire Energy AS- On 6/19/13, the Company’s CEO, Richard L. McAdoo and its CFO, Robert V. Rudman both joined the Board of Directors of the Company's 51% owned subsidiary, Visionaire Energy AS.

New Share Issues– During the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued a total of 23,275,000 news common shares. In January 2013, a private placement was completed for 2,975,000 shares for total proceeds of $59,500. In June 2013, a share-swap with the Norwegian company of Visionaire Invest AS involving 20,000,000 Company shares was completed. Also in June 2013, a private placement was completed for 300,000 shares for total proceeds of $15,000.

Share Purchase Warrant Activity- During the 2013 Fiscal Year, a total of 3,125,000 warrants were issued in conjunction with two private placements and a total of 12,350,000 expired for a net decrease in total warrants of 9,225,000.

Incentive Stock Option Activity- On 12/31/12, a total of 8,340,000 stock options expired and on 1/04/13 at total of 7,800,000 new incentive stock options were granted havingfor a net decrease in total stock options of 540,000 for the 2013 Fiscal Year.

Convertible Promissory Note- On 9/10/11, the Company issued to the Encompass Fund (the “Holder”) a convertible note in the principal sum of $250,000 together with Interest at the annual rate of 10%, a conversion rate of $0.08 per share, and a maturity date of 9/16/12. In addition to the issuance of the note, the Company issued a total of 1,562,500 share purchase warrants to the Holder at the closing. The warrants had a fixed two year term and an exercise price of $0.15$0.12 per share. On 11/12/12, the Company and the Holder agreed to amend the note (1) to reflect a 3 yearnew annual interest rate of 18% to take effect from the issue date of 9/21/11, (2) to reduce the conversion rate from $0.08 to $0.05 per share, and (3) to extend

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 9 of 33





the maturity date to 3/15/13.On 5/14/13, the Company and the Holder further agreed (1) to amend the note by extending the maturity date to 9/16/13, (2) to extend the term expiring 9/16/12.of the warrants to 3/21/15, and (3) to reduce the exercise price of the warrants to $0.08.

MATERIAL EVENTS OCCURRING SINCE THE
LAST FISCAL YEAR END 6/30/1013 UNTIL THE REPORT DATE

2011 Bengara-II Block Budget Presented Reports Filed for Quarters Ended 9/30/13, 12/31/13, and 3/31/14-Pursuant to a press release made on 11/16/10 On 5/02/14 and 5/09/14 we filed the Company announced that its 18% owned subsidiary Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. ("CGB2") has proposed a 2011 Bengara-II Block exploration budget to Indonesian oilrequired interim quarterly financial reports and gas regulatorsother disclosure in compliance with regulations of our home jurisdiction and the total amount of US$ 89 Million. The total proposed by CGB2 included the drilling of two wells in 2011 including one appraisal well and one exploratory and/or additional appraisal well at a combined budget of US$ 53.8 Million. The total also included an amount of US$ 30.8 Million for 2D and 3D seismic acquisition, processing, and interpretation expenditures. Most of the 2011 seismic expenditure is a carry forward from the 2010 budget yearBritish Columbia Securities for the ongoing field acquisition survey originally begun in 2010. However,quarters ended 9/30/13, 12/31/13, and 3/31/14, the amount proposed for 2011 does include an increase in expected 2010 seismic acquisition costs to cover cost overruns expected as a resultfirst three quarters of delays to 2010 field acquisition ef forts caused by surface damage claim issues. The remainder of the proposed budget provides for technical studies intended to justify a plan of developmentour Fiscal 2014. These reports were filed electronically on SEDAR and for administrative expenses. The budget is subject to the revision of and the approval of Indonesian oil and gas regulator BPMIGAS.

2010 Audited Annual Financial Statements Filed- On 10/28/10 the Company filed its auditedincluded management prepared, but unaudited, interim, condensed, consolidated financial statements for the quarter plus a management discussion and analysis thereof.

Annual Financial Report Filed for Fiscal Year2013- On 4/23/14 we filed the required audited annual financial reports and other disclosure in compliance with regulations of our home jurisdiction and the British Columbia Securities for our Fiscal 2013 ended 6/30/10 with Canadian securities regulatory authorities13. These reports were filed electronically on SEDAR in accordance with Canadian securities requirements.

2010 AGM Set- On 10/08/10and included audited consolidated financial statements for the Company served notice of its Annual General Meeting to be held on 12/10/10. All holders of common shares as ofyear plus a management discussion and analysis thereof. This filing also included the record date, 11/05/10 shall be entitled to vote at the meeting.

2010 Annual Reserves Report Posted- On 11/04/10 the Company posted itsCompany's annual reserves report at fiscal year end 6/30/10 on SEDARfor Fiscal Year 2013 in the form referred to in item 3 of section 2.1 of Canadian National Instrument 51-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities” (“NI 51-101”). The companion Form 51-101F2 “Report On Reserves Data By Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator Or Auditor” to the Form 51-101F1 section of the NI 51-101 was filed concurrently and is nil because the Company is an exploration stage company and has no reserves to report on. The companion Form 51-101F3 “Report of Management and Directors on Oil And Gas Disclosure” was also filed concurrently. The full NI 51-101 report has been filed on SEDAR and is available for download at http://sedar.com/search/search_form_pc_en.htm.

Investment ActivityEstablishes Joint Venture in Malaysia- On 7/7/1011/12/13, the Company entered into a Share Sale50/50 joint bid arrangement with an established Malaysian partner to evaluate opportunities and Transfer Agreement to sell 100%present carefully selected bids for new oil and gas production sharing and risk service contracts offered in Malaysia by PETRONAS, the national oil company.

Reports Filed for Quarter Ended 3/31/13- On 12/2/13, we filed the required financial reports and other disclosure in compliance with regulations of our home jurisdiction and the British Columbia Securities for the quarter ended 3/31/13, the end of the shares inthird quarter and first nine months of our Fiscal Year 2013. These reports were filed electronically on SEDAR and included management prepared but unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarter plus a management discussion and analysis thereof.

Results of Bengara-II Contract Bid Reported- On 12/23/13, the Company announced that its inactive subsidiary Continental Energy Pte. Ltd. (“CEPL”)Indonesian production sharing contract (PSC) bid group was one of seven unsuccessful bidders for the Bengara-II Block pursuant to Transafrica Management SARL (60%)a bid submitted to Indonesian oil and C&S Infrastructure LLC (40%gas regulator, MIGAS, on 2/14/13. The winning bid was submitted by PT Tansri Madjid Energi, an Indonesian coal mining company, and consisted of a firm work obligation of US$ 51,750,000 to be carried out during the first three PSC contract years plus a signature bonus of US$ 2,500,000. The winning work commitment includes the drilling of 5 exploratory wells, acquisition of 500 line kilometers of 2D seismic data, and acquisition of 200 square kilometers of 3D seismic data.

Norwegian Affiliate Awarded Major Contract- On 1/13/14, the Company announced that its affiliate, VTT Maritime AS ("VTT"), had been awarded a contract valued at US$ 10.3 million by the Norwegian Road Authority ("NorRoad") for considerationa portion of $71,500 which wasNorRoad's planned highway E39 improvement project. Under the contract, VTT will provide sea mapping, seismic surveying and measurement wire drilling at the site of a major subsea tunnel location.

Convertible Promissory Note- On 9/10/11, the Company issued to be paid on or before 7/31/10. On 7/31/10, the agreement was amendedEncompass Fund (the “Holder”) a convertible note in the principal sum of $250,000 together with Interest at the annual rate of 10%, a conversion rate of $0.08 per share, and a maturity date of September 16, 2012. In addition to extend the 7/31/10 payment deadline until 11/1/10.

Share Purchase Warrants Activity- No outstandingissuance of the note, the Company issued a total of 1,562,500 share purchase warrants were exercised. No new share purchaseto the Holder at the closing. The warrants were issued. No share purchase warrants expired. On 8/29/10 the Company amended the terms of certain outstanding incentive warrants to bring them into line with the current market conditions. A total of 10,000,000 warrants withhad a fixed two year term and an exercise price of $0.90$0.12 per shareshare. On 11/12/12 and an expiryon 5/14/13, the Company and the Holder agreed to amend the note. On 10/4/13, it was further agreed to amend the note by extending the maturity date of 8/29/10 were amended to have a new11/15/13 and on 12/12/13, the Company and the Holder agreed (1) to amend the note by extending the maturity date to 1/31/14, and (2) to reduce the exercise price of $0.20the warrants from $0.08 to $0.05. On 3/31/14, the Company and a new expirythe holder of the convertible promissory note reached an agreement to extend the maturity date of 8/29/12.the promissory note to 4/30/14 and extended the terms of the warrants to 12/31/15.

New Share Issues- During the period between the 6/30/13 Fiscal Year end and the Report Date, the Company issued a total of 800,000 new common shares. A private placement of 500,000 shares for total proceeds of $25,000 was completed on 7/25/13 and another of 300,000 shares for total proceeds of $15,000 on 10/21/13.

Share Purchase Warrant Activity- During the period between the 6/30/13 Fiscal Year end and the Report Date, the Company issued a total of 2,550,000 warrants. Of this total, 550,000 were issued in conjunction with two private placements and the other 2,000,000 warrants were issued to two financial consultants. During the period, 2,643,000 warrants expired during this period.

Incentive Stock OptionsOption Activity- No outstandingDuring the period between the 6/30/13 Fiscal Year end and the Report Date, no incentive stock options were exercised. No new incentive stock options were granted. No outstanding incentive stock options expired. On 9/29/10 thegranted, exercised, expired, or amended.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 10 of 33





B.BUSINESS OVERVIEW.

The Company amended the terms of certain outstanding stock optionsis an emerging international energy investment company established to bring them into line with the current market conditions. A total of 600,000 stock options having exercise prices of $0.07 per share and with an expiry date of 12/31/10 were amended to have a new expiry date of 12/31/11. A total of 350,000 stock options having exercise prices of $0.07 and with varying expiry dates were amended to have a new expiry date of 6/30/12. A total of 7,690,000 stock options having exercise prices of $0.07 and with varying expiry dates were amended to have a new expiry date of 12/31/12.

B.  BUSINESS OVERVIEW.

Our mission is to discover a "Company Maker" oil field containing over 100 Million barrels of reserves, an "Elephant"acquire participating interests in oil, industry parlance. We believe our chancesgas, and alternative energy projects, producers, and related services providers doing business outside of doing so are greatest in Indonesia.North America.

We are a small oil and gas exploration company focused entirely on making a major oil or gas discovery in Indonesia, one of the few places in the world, where large tracts of highly prospective acreage can be accumulated. Indonesia has a long and successful history of oil and gas exploration since 1890 and is the birthplace of Shell Oil. Many independent oil finders have hit it big there. Geological conditions are proven to be excellent for sizable petroleum accumulation. A strong and growing domestic demand for both crude oil and natural gas provides expanding and nearby markets for any production Continental establishes.

Oil is first found in the mind, and any resource exploration company relies almost entirely upon the talent and experience of its technical staff and management. Continental's Jakarta based management and technical staff have long experience in-country and solid relationships with both industry and government at all levels.

Oil exploration involves a high degree of technical and commercial risk and is characterized by a continuous need for fresh capital. Continental intends to participate in properties exhibiting a range of risk profiles to reduce its cost exposure and enhance the possibility of wildcat success.

C.  ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE.

C.ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE.

The Company conducts and manages substantially all of its business activities through the use of wholly-owned corporate subsidiaries, partially owned joint venture corporations, and joint ventures. The Company itself functions as a holding company centralizing management and administrative activities while specific project and property ownership and management are held and vested in the subsidiary, joint venture company, or joint venture.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 10 of 33 




Wholly-owned Subsidiaries- From time to time the Company establishes certain wholly and exclusively owned and controlled subsidiary companies usually for a special and single purpose such as, for example, to own and hold the rights to a specific oil and gas property. The accounts of wholly-owned subsidiaries are consolidated into those of the Company. At the Report Date, and during the past three fiscal years,Fiscal Years, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries include or included the following:

TXX Energy Corporation ("TXX")was incorporated on 1/16/06 in Texas by the Company as a wholly-owned subsidiary. TXX was formed for the purposes of pursuing a certain oil and gas exploration and production opportunities in the USA which never materialized. During the Fiscal Year 2009 the Company wound up and dissolved TXX and requested it be struck off. At the Report Date the Company has no further interests in TXX.

Continental Energy Pte. Ltd.(“CEPL”)was incorporated on 6/16/08 in Singapore by the Company. CEPL was formed for the for the purposes of holding and consolidating the Company's interest in certain new and planned future SE Asian oil and gas exploration and production properties. During Fiscal 2009 CEPL established and operated wholly-owned subsidiaries of its ownproperties which included the following:

Continental Energy (South Bengara-II) Pte. Ltd. (“CSB2”)was incorporated on 6/17/08 in Singapore by the Company as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CEPL. CSB2 was formed for the contingent purposes of owning and holding a 24.999% interest in a joint venture company ACG (South Bengara-II) Pte. Ltd. (“ACG”). During Fiscal 2009 the Company withdrew from the opportunity and CSB2 returned its share allotment in ACG. During Fiscal 2010 CSB2 was wound up and struck off by the Singapore companies registrar. At the Report Date the Company has no further interests in CSB2.

Continental Energy (Tungkal) Pte. Ltd. (“CETK”)was incorporated on 8/1/08 in Singapore by the Company as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CEPL. CETK was formed for the contingent purposes of owning and holding the Company's interest in the Tungkal PSC joint venture. During Fiscal 2009 the Company’s attempts to acquire an interest in the Tungkal PSC joint venture were not successful. During Fiscal 2010 CETK was wound up and struck off by the Singapore companies registrar. At the Report Date the Company has no further interests in CETK.

CEPL remained dormant through the end of Fiscal 2010. Subsequent to end Fiscal 2010 on 6/30/10, thenever materialized. The Company sold 100% of its shares of CEPL to two armsarm’s length parties for cash consideration of US$ 71,500 with effect on 7/7/10. At the Report DateSince that date the Company has no further interests in CEPL.

Partially Owned Joint Venture Companies- From time to time the Company participates in certain special purpose joint venture companies which are jointly owned with other non-related shareholders and are jointly operated and controlled pursuant to the terms of a joint venture company shareholders agreement. At the Report Date the Company's interests in partially owned joint venture corporations include the following:

Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. ("CGB2")is a joint venture companywas incorporated as "Apex (Bengara-II) Ltd." on 09/09/97 under the British Virgin Islands International Business Corporations Act. On 06/05/03 the name was changed to "Continental-Wisdom-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd." and on 12/17/03 to "Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd.". CGB2 is a special and single purpose joint venture company established to exclusively hold and operate the Bengara-II Block oil and gas property under an Indonesian production sharing contract ("PSC") of which CGB2 ownsat one time owned an undivided 100% participating interest. That expiry of the contract formerly owned by CGB2 was announced by the Company in a press release dated 10/16/12. At the Report Date, the Company owns 9,000 shares of CGB2 representing a minority 18% stake in CGB2. GeoPetro Resources Company owns 12%. CNPCHKKunlun Energy Company Ltd. owns 70% and exerts effective management control of CGB2. The Company's 18% interest in CGB2 is accounted for ondormant and the cost basis.Company has no further obligations to it or related to it.

CG Xploration Inc.Tawau Green Energy Sdn. Bhd. ("CGX"TGE")is a joint venture company incorporated in Malaysia. During Fiscal Year 2012, on 11/18/055/7/12, the Company acquired 300,000 shares, representing a 10% stake, of TGE.TGE is a privately held company incorporated in Delaware.and based in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia and is in the business of developing a geothermal energy resource at its Apas Kiri project site, Sabah, Malaysia. On 5/20/13, during Fiscal Year 2013, the Company returned all 300,000 of the TGE shares and wrote off its investment in TGE. At the Report Date, the Company owns 500no shares representing a 50% stake in CGX. GeoPetro Resources Company ("GeoPetro") also owns 50%. CGX was formed for the express and exclusive purpose of identifying, evaluating, developing, and acquiring new oil and gas production sharing contracts with the Indonesian government in areas geographically limited to the Indonesian portions of the islands of Borneo and New Guinea in accordance with a CGX shareholders agreement dated 1/1/07. The Company and GeoPetro jointly control the operations of CGX in the proportions 50/50 in accordance with a CGX shareholders agreement. Further, the CGX shareholders agreement provides that in the event that any CGX new business development activities are successful then the resulting new oil and gas property would be jointly owned and controlled by the Company and GeoPetro under a n ew and separate joint venture agreement or through a newly established joint venture company. The intent of the shareholders is that CGX shall not directly own any property but shall instead function only as new project development vehicle for the joint benefit of the Company and GeoPetro. In accordance with Canadian GAAP, CGX is accounted for by proportional consolidation in the Company's financial statements.TGE.

Continental Biofuels CorporationVisionaire Energy AS ("CBC"VE")is a joint venture company incorporated on 8/30/07 in Delaware.Norway. On 6/4/13, the Company acquired a 51% shareholding stake in VE. The acquisition was accomplished by an arms-length, non-cash, share-swap transaction with Visionaire Invest AS ("VI"), the sole shareholder of VE. The Company subscribedissued 20 million of its common shares, representing a stake of approximately 16.7% in the Company to VI, in exchange for 51% of the authorized and purchased 1,000outstanding shares of the 2,500 issuedVE. The principal assets of VE are its management and fully paid share capital of CBC representingits shareholdings in two separate, privately owned, offshore oil and gas service providers both based in Bergen, Norway. VE owns a 40% stake49% shareholding equity interest in CBC. The remaining 60% stakeVTT Maritime AS and a 41% equity interest in CBC was subscribed by a cofounder group of five private investors led by Casimir Capital LP of New York which included two then Directors of the Company, each a 10% stake. CBC was formed for the purpose of establishing palm oil to biodiesel projectsRADA Engineering and business in SE Asia. Due to the downturn in commodity prices, particularly that of crude palm oil, the shareholders decided to cease operation of CBC. During Fiscal 2009, CBC was wound up and dissolved on 8/11/08. The Company's 40% interest therein was written down to a nominal value at end the end fiscal year 2008 on 6/30/08. At the Report Date the Company has no further interests in CBC.Consulting AS.

ACG (South Bengara-II) Ltd. ("ACG")is a joint venture company incorporated on 7/22/08 in Singapore. The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary CSB2 was allocated 24,999 of the ordinary shares of ACG representing a 24.999% stake in ACG. Other shareholders included GeoPetro also allocated a 24.999% stake and Adelphi Energy Ltd. ("Adelphi") who is allocated a 50.002% stake. The allocations are made pursuant to a joint bid agreement entered by the Company with GeoPetro and Adelphi for the purposes of joining together through ACG in a competitive bid for a new production sharing contract ("PSC") in Indonesia. The shares of ACG were to only be issued at such time as ACG signs the new PSC in the event the bid is successful. During Fiscal 2009 the Company withdrew from the opportunity and CSB2 returned its share allotment in ACG to Adelphi. At the Report Date the Company has no further interests in ACG.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 11 of 33 




Joint Ventures- From time to time the Company enters joint ventures with other partners pursuant to a joint venture agreement or joint operating agreement. Such joint venture arrangements are a customary practice for multiple unrelated companies to jointly own and share the risks and rewards of oil and gas exploration and production properties. At the Report Date the Company's hasis involved in the following joint ventures:

CBM Joint Study and Bid Group- On 5/5/12 the Company announced that it had entered into a Joint Study and Bid Group Agreement with CBM Asia Development Corp. ("CBM Asia") a Canadian Coal Bed Methane ("CBM") developer with existing CBM developments in Indonesia. Under the agreement, the Company and CBM Asia would jointly and exclusively study selected areas in Indonesia with the objective of identifying geologically justified candidate areas to be jointly pursued as targets of opportunity for direct acquisition of CBM production sharing contracts ("PSCs") offered by the Indonesian government. Successful CBM PSC acquisitions would be shared by the Company and CBM Asia under a pre-agreed joint operating agreement ("JOA") format in the participating interest proportions 75% CBM Asia and 25% the Company. CBM Asia shall act as operator under the JOA and any CBM PSC and shall pay 100% of the JOA's CBM PSC general and administrative costs. All CBM PSC acquisition costs and other JOA exploration and drilling costs would be borne by the parties in proportion to their respective JOA participating interests. The agreement had a term of 2 years. During Fiscal 2013, it expired and terminated on 4/27/14 because no joint ventures.bids were prepared or submitted prior to that date. The exclusivity provisions of the agreement remain in effect for an additional 1 year and the confidentiality provisions for an additional 2 years.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 11 of 33





D.  PMalaysia Joint Study and Bid GroupROPERTY,PLANT,AND EQUIPMENT.On 11/12/13, the Company entered into a 50/50 joint bid arrangement with an established Malaysian partner to evaluate opportunities and present carefully selected bids for new oil and gas production sharing and risk service contracts offered in Malaysia by PETRONAS, the national oil company.

D.PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT.

a.  OIL AND GAS RESERVES.

a .OIL ANDGASRESE RVES.

Oil and gas operations are material to our business operations. As at the Report Date, all of our oil and gas properties are considered unproved and we have not established substantive proved reserves that are material to our operations or financial position in accordance with SEC reserve guidance set out in Industry Guide 2 - Disclosure of Oil and Gas Operations. We have not filed reports claiming oil or gas reserves to any other federal authority or agency since the beginning of the last fiscal year.Fiscal Year.

b.  OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION.

b .Oil and Gas Production

As at the Report Date, we have not established oil or gas production from any of our properties.

c.  DRILLING ACTIVITY.

c .Drilling Activity.

The following table sets out the number of wells we participated in during each of our three most recently completed fiscal years.Fiscal Years.

Fiscal Year Ended
Wells by Classification6/30/106/30/096/30/08Drilling Activity for Fiscal Year Ended
GrossNetGrossNetGrossNet
Wells by Classification6/30/136/30/126/30/11
Gross Net GrossNet GrossNet
00004.70
Development Wells Drilled 000000
Total - Wells by Classification 00004.70
       
Wells by Type  Gross  NetGrossNetGross Net
Productive Oil Wells Completed 000000
Productive Gas Wells Completed 000000
Service Wells Completed 000000
Dry Holes Drilled 00004.70
Total - Wells by Type 00004.70

Notes:

A “gross well” is a well in which we own a participating interest. The total number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which we own or owned a participating interest.

A “net well” is deemed to exist when the sum of all fractional ownership interests in gross wells equals one. The number of net wells is the sum of the proportion of the actual fractional participating interests we own in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.

A “service well” is a well drilled for purposes other than oil or gas production, for example for use as a water or gas injection well or as a salt water disposal well.
A “dry hole” is an exploratory or a development well found to be incapable of producing either oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as a commercially productive oil or gas well. A “productive” well is an exploratory or a development well that is not a dry hole.


Calendar 2007 Drilling Program- During the latter part of Fiscal 2007 and the first half of Fiscal 2008 the Company’s 18% owned joint venture company Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. drilled 4 exploration wells on the Bengara-II PSC property. The results and status of these wells as at the Report Date are summarized as follows:

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F d .Page 12 of 33 Acreage, Project Areas and Leases.




d.  ACREAGE,PROJECT AREAS AND LEASES.

The following table sets out the acreage of project areas, production sharing contract areas, and leases in which we have or held a participating interest, as at the end of each of our three most recently completed fiscal years.Fiscal Years. All of our acreage is undeveloped.

Acreage and Leases at Fiscal Year Ended
Area 6/30/106/30/09 6/30/08 
GrossNetGrossNetGrossNet
Lease, Area, PSC, or PropertyAcreage and Leases at Fiscal Year Ended
6/30/136/30/126/30/11
Gross NetGrossNetGrossNet
Bengara-II PSC, Indonesia 901,668162,300901,668162,300901,668162,300-603,848108,692603,848108,692
Total - Acres 901,668162,300901,668162,300901,668162,300-603,848108,692603,848108,692

Notes to table:

A “gross acre” is an acre in which we own or owned a participating interest. The total number of gross acres is the total number of acres in which we own or owned a participating interest.

A “net acre” is deemed to exist when the sum of all fractional ownership interests in gross acres equals one. The number of net acres is the sum of the proportion of the actual fractional participating interests we own or owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013

Notes:

A “gross acre” is an acre in which we own or owned a participating interest. The total numberPage 12 of gross acres is the total number of acres in which we own or owned a participating interest.
A “net acre” is deemed to exist when the sum of all fractional ownership interests in gross acres equals one. The number of net acres is the sum of the proportion of the actual fractional participating interests we own or owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.

33





Location of Company’s Oil & Gas Properties- As of the Report Date the Company owns one oil and gas property by virtue of its 18% shares holding interest in Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. The area covered by the Bengara -IIBengara-II PSC property (the "Bengara-II Block") is located mostly onshore and partially offshore in the Indonesian province of East Kalimantan on the east coast of the island of Borneo. The Block lies in the southern portion of the prolific hydrocarbon producing Tarakan Basin which has produced oil and gas since 1906. The regional capital city of Tanjung Selor lies in the center of the Block. Frequent commercial airline flights connect Jakarta through Balikpapan to the island of Tarakan and hourly water taxi rides connect Tarakan to Tanjung Selor.

The Bengara-II Production Sharing Contract (“PSC”)- On 12/04/97 Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. (“CGB2”("CGB2") entered into a Production Sharing Contract (“PSC”) for the Bengara-II PSC contract area with the Minister of Mines and Energy of the Republic of Indonesia. CGB2 iswas the sole owner of 100% of the rights to the Bengara-II PSC. Management of operating activities in the Bengara-II contract area pursuant to the PSC is vested in CGB2 as the Bengara-II PSC "Operator". At the Report Date, the Company owns 9,000 shares of CGB2 representing a minority 18% stake in CGB2. GeoPetro Resources Company owns 12%. Kunlun Energy Company Ltd. ("Kunlun") owns 70% and controls management of CGB2 and the Bengara-II PSC.

PSC Leaseholds- The Production Sharing Contract or "PSC" isAt the formend of leasehold by whichFiscal 2012 the government of Indonesian grantsCompany owned one oil and gas concession rights. In returnproperty by virtue of its 18% shares holding interest in CGB2. Subsequent to Fiscal 2012 year end, the Company announced on 10/16/12 that negotiations with the Indonesian government for a commitment to conduct an exploration work program of agree minimum expenditures for a specified seismic acquisition and exploratory drilling "Work Program", a PSC Contractor will receive exclusive rights to explore for and exploit and produce any petroleum found within his PSC contract area for a term of 30 years consisting of an 10-year exploration period followed by a 20-year production period. The signature featureextension of the Bengara-II PSC's term were terminated by CGB2 and consequently the Bengara-II PSC contract is the concepthas been relinquished and provision for "Cost Recovery". Cost Recovery provisions permit any Contractor making a commercial discovery of petroleum within his PSC contract areaallowed to fully recover ALL of his prior expenditures within the PSC contract area out of first revenue from oil and gas production prior to sharing any remaining revenueexpire in accordance with the government. With some mi nor variations, any PSC provides for the Contractor to take up to 80% of the revenues from all petroleum sales to reimburse 100% of its sunk historical costs with current period production operating costs as non-taxable Cost Recovery. Any revenues from any production period remaining after all Cost Recovery are "split" and shared usually, but not always, in the proportions 26.7857% to the Contractor and 73.2143% to the government in the case of crude oil and 62.50% to the Contractor and 37.50% to the government in the case of natural gas. Only after all prior and costs are recovered through Cost Recovery, the Contractor's production share of oil and gas is subject to a corporate income tax of 44%.term.

New Acquisitions and Dispositions- During Fiscal 2010 the Company made no new acquisitions or dispositions of oil and gas properties.

e.  OIL AND GAS COSTS.

e .O i l and gas costs.

The following table summarizes the costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration, development, and related joint venture activities for our Company for our three most recently completed fiscal years.Fiscal Years.

Activity Oil and Gas Costs at Fiscal Year Ended 
  6/30/10  6/30/09  6/30/08 
Exploration investment in Bengara-II  1,469  10,998  32,760 
Reimbursement from Joint Venture Partners -- -- -- 
Impairment/Abandonment Provision  (1,469 (10,998 (32,760
Total - US$ -- -- -- 
 Oil and Gas Costs at Fiscal Year Ended
Cost6/30/136/30/126/30/11
Exploration investment in Bengara-II--329515
Impairment/Abandonment Provision for Bengara-II--(329)(515)
Total - US$------

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 13 of 33 




Notes to table:

On 12/04/97 Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. ("CGB2") entered into a Production Sharing Contract (“PSC”) for the Bengara-II PSC contract area with the Minister of Mines and Energy of the Republic of Indonesia. CGB2 was the sole owner of 100% of the rights to the Bengara-II PSC. Management of operating activities in the Bengara-II contract area pursuant to the PSC is vested in CGB2 as the Bengara-II PSC "Operator". At the Report Date, the Company owns 9,000 shares of CGB2 representing a minority 18% stake in CGB2. GeoPetro Resources Company owns 12%. Kunlun Energy Company Ltd. ("Kunlun") owns 70% and controls management of CGB2 and the Bengara-II PSC.

At the end of Fiscal 2012 the Company owned one oil and gas property by virtue of its 18% shares holding interest in CGB2. Subsequent to Fiscal 2012 year end, the Company announced on 10/16/12 that negotiations with the Indonesian government for an extension of the Bengara-II PSC's term were terminated by CGB2 and consequently the Bengara-II PSC has been relinquished and allowed to expire in accordance with its term.

ITEM4A.-4A : UNRESOLVEDSTAFFCOMMENTS

We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-4A is not applicable.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 13 of 33





ITEM5.-5 : OPERATING ANDFINANCIALREVIEW ANDPROSPECTS

A.  OPERATING RESULTS.

A.OPERATING RESULTS.

The following discussion of the Company's financial results includes those for the most recently completed last three fiscal yearsFiscal Years ended 6/30/10,13, 6/30/09,12, and 6/30/08. Comparisons to11. Also included below is a discussion of the Company's financial results for the first 6 months of our Fiscal Year 2014 as at 12/31/2013. As used below, the phrase "the same period last year" referrefers to financial results for the same fiscal period ended the previous fiscal year and may be read together with the audited, consolidated financial statements for the previous fiscal year ended 6/30/09.

Overview- The Company is an oil and gas exploration company engaged in the assembly of a portfolio of oil and gas exploration properties with high potential resource prospects. The Company is focusing its efforts in Indonesia where large tracts of acreage can be accumulated, there is a long and positive history of oil exploration success, and geological conditions are favorable for hydrocarbon accumulation. Continental is an exploration stage company and none of its oil and gas properties currently generate revenue.Fiscal Year.

FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF FISCAL YEAR 2010,2014, ENDED 3/31/14

The nine month period ended 3/31/14 corresponds to the third quarter of the Company's Fiscal Year ending 6/30/14.The information for the nine month period was derived from management prepared, unaudited, condensed, interim, consolidated financial statements filed herewith. All amounts disclosed are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.

Investments during the Nine Months of Fiscal 2014 ended on 3/31/14- During the nine month period ended 3/31/14, the Company received $nil from investing activities.

Finance during the Nine Months of Fiscal 2014 ended on 3/31/14- During the nine month period ended 3/31/14, the Company generated $783,439 from financing activities which included proceeds from private placements and loans.

Income during the Nine Months of Fiscal 2014 ending on 3/31/14- Overall, the Company incurred a loss from operations during the nine month period ended 3/31/14 of $849,555 and a loss per share of $0.01.

Expenses during the Nine Months of Fiscal 2014 ending on 3/31/14- Total equity loss during the nine months ended 3/31/14 was $382,258 compared to $nil for the same period ended 3/31/13. The increase in loss is primarily due to the Company equity accounting for the losses of its affiliates. The Company made the investment in the affiliates during the quarter ended 6/30/13. During the nine months ended 3/31/14, financing fees were $nil compared to $154,352 during the same nine month period ended 3/31/13. The Company incurred share-based payment expense of $20,877 during the nine month period ended 3/31/14 representing the calculated fair value of the share purchase warrants granted to the Company’s consultants, compared to $152,880 for the same nine month period ended 3/31/13.

FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE COMPANY’S FISCAL YEAR 2013, ENDED 6/30/1013

All balances referred to in the following discussion are in US$ currency unless otherwise indicated.

Investments During Fiscal Year 2013 Ended on 6/30/13- On 6/4/13, the Company acquired a 51% shareholding stake in Visionaire Energy AS (“VE"), a privately held Norwegian company. The acquisition was accomplished by an arms-length, non-cash, share-swap transaction with VE's sole shareholder Visionaire Invest AS ("VI"). The Company issued 20 million of its common shares to VI, representing a stake of 16.7% in the Company, in exchange for 51% of the authorized and outstanding shares of Visionaire. The principal assets of Visionaire are its management and its shareholdings in two separate, privately owned, offshore oil and gas service providers both based in Bergen, Norway. Visionaire owns a 49% equity interest in VTT Maritime AS and a 41% equity interest in RADA Engineering and Consulting AS.

Finance During Fiscal Year 2013 Ended on 6/30/13- During the Fiscal Year ended 6/30/13, the Company received $44,500 from the proceeds of two private placements. In the prior year ended 6/30/12, $1,000,000 was received as proceeds of a private placement and a promissory note.

Income During Fiscal Year 2013 Ended on 6/30/13- Overall, the Company had a loss from operations during the Fiscal Year ended 6/30/13 of $700,115 compared to $1,846,559 in the prior year ended 6/30/12. The Company had a loss per share of $0.01 in 2013 compared to a loss per share of $0.02 in 2012.

Expenses During Fiscal Year 2013 Ended on 6/30/13- General and administrative expenses decreased by $854,718 from $1,501,366 to $646,648 for the Fiscal Years ended 6/30/12 and 6/30/13 respectively. The decrease is primarily attributable to the lower share-based payments expense of $52,250 compared to $692,182 in Fiscal 2012 and financing fee of $nil compared to $160,994, as a result of the differences in the Company’s estimates for such items in the two years. The Company’s investor relations costs were also higher in Fiscal 2012 due to the Company’s promotional activities at the time. The investor relations costs were $41,915 in Fiscal 2012 and only $2,180 in Fiscal 2013. As a result of the Company’s convertible promissory note being accreted almost to its face value, the accretion expense was also lower in Fiscal 2013 at $14,730 compared to $47,380 in Fiscal 2012. The decrease in costs related to the above items was offset by an increase in interest charges during Fiscal 2013 of $33,596. The terms of the Company’s convertible promissory note were modified in Fiscal 2013 to accrue interest at 18% retroactively from the 9/10/11 date of the issuance of such convertible promissory note, resulting in the higher interest charge during the year ended 6/30/13.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 14 of 33





FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE COMPANY’S FISCAL YEAR 2012, ENDED ON 6/30/12

All balances referred to in the following discussion are in US$ currency unless otherwise indicated.

Investments During Fiscal Year 2012 Ended on 6/30/1012- TheDuring the Fiscal Year ended 6/30/12, the Company’s oil and gas property expenditures continue to be at a maintenance level until management decides to commence further exploration and development of its Indonesian properties. On 5/7/12, the Company acquired 300,000 shares of Tawau Green Energy Sdn. Bhd. (“TGE”) for the sum of 6,000,000 Malaysian Ringgit (“MYR”) ($1,965,600). TGE is a privately held company based in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia and is in the business of developing geothermal energy at the Apas Kiri project site. The 300,000 shares represent the Company’s 10% interest in TGE. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company shall pay MYR 3,000,000 in the form of 12 monthly payments of MYR 250,000 each before 5/6/13. The remaining MYR 3,000,000 of the investment will be earned through the Company’s expenditures on a mutually agreed upon work program conducted at Apas Kiri site prior to 5/6/13. In the event that the Company elects not to complete the transaction during the prescribed 12-month period, then the Company shall be obliged to return that proportion of the 300,000 shares unpaid-for at 5/6/13. Transaction costs amounted to MYR 19,969 ($6,500), resulting in a total cost of investment in TGE of $1,972,100.

Finance During Fiscal Year 2012 Ended on 6/30/12- During the Fiscal Year ended 6/30/12, the Company received $1,000,000 from the proceeds of a private placement and convertible promissory note. These receipts were offset by the payments on the Company’s promissory notes with interest of $110,830. In the prior year the Company incurred property acquisition costs related to the Tungkal acquisition and the South Bengara-II acquisition amounting to $1,313,123 and costs relating to its investment in Continental Biofuels amounting to $122,028.

Finance during Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/10- During the year ended 6/30/10, a total11, $30,000 was received as proceeds of 2,643,000 new shares were issued pursuant to private placements for net proceeds to the Company of $185,010. On 6/30/10, the Company had options outstanding granted to directors, officers and consultants to purchase an aggregate of 10,750,000 shares at a price of $0.07 and expiring at varying dates between December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011. On 6/30/10, the Company had warrants outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 17,968,000 shares at prices rangingpromissory notes from $0.07 to $0.90 and expiring at varying dates between August 29, 2010 and February 26, 2013.related parties.

Income duringDuring Fiscal Year 2012 Ended on 6/30/1012- Overall, the Company had a loss from operations during the year ended 6/30/1012 of $1,275,386$ 1,846,559 compared to $3,128,587$1,893,765 in the year ended 6/30/09.11. The Company had a loss per share of $0.02 in 20102012 compared to a loss per share of $0.05$0.03 in 2009. During the period, the Company generated $5 in interest income compared with $12,717 in the prior period. The decrease is due to lower cash balances on hand during the current period. In the prior period, the Company wrote off its property acquisition costs related to the Tungkal acquisition and the South Bengara-II acquisition amounting to $1,313,123 and its investment in Continental Biofuels amounting to $122,029. The Company did not have any similar write offs during the year ended 6/30/10.2011.

Expenses duringDuring Fiscal Year 2012 Ended on 6/30/1012- General and administrative expenses decreased by $442,092$ 391,178 from $1,716,014$1,892,544 to $1,273,922$ 1,501,366 for the yearsFiscal Years ended 6/30/0911 and 20106/30/12, respectively. The significant changes to general and administrative expenses are as follows. Management salaries and wagesfollows: Most significantly, non-cash financing fees decreased $421,180 from $791,070$1,115,458 to $369,890$ 160,994 as the Company did not haveterms of fewer outstanding share purchase warrants were modified resulting in a CFO in place for the first 3 months of the year as well as all other management taking a reduction in pay effective April 1, 2009. Office expenses decreased $38,179 from $135,571 to $97,392 as the former CFO’s Dallas office was closedlower incremental fair value charge during the prior year. Travel and accommodation decreased by $63,167 from $106,283 to $43,116 as the Company was not working on any acquisition deals during the period that required extensive travel. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense, relating to management and consulting contracts, of $183,960 for the year ended 6/30/10 compared12. Management fees decreased from $282,724 to $376,127$172,184 as a result of the termination of an employment contract and the temporary suspension of the salary of an officer in the prior year. Office expenses decreased from $85,305 to $39,644 as a result of the sale of the Company’s inactive subsidiary, CEPL in the prior year and the wind up of the operations of the CGX joint venture. The decreases in the above costs were offset by an increase in share-based payments expense which increased from $140,953 to $ 692,182 as a result of additional option grants in the current year. Accretion expense increased from $nil to $47,380 as a result of accretion of the discounted liability balance of the convertible note issued by the Company during the year ended 6/30/0912. Travel and accommodation expense increased from $18,942 to $53,724 as a result of increased corporate travel related to securing a private placement as well as travel during negotiations for a decrease of $192,167. The current period expense relates to options and warrants granted to Robert Rudman, the Company’s new CFO, the Company’s President and COO, Andrew Erikkson, the Company’s Geophysicist, Robert Paul, Agoracom Investor Relations Corp. (“Agoracom”), Aspen Capital Partners LLC (“Aspen”)TGE investment and the incremental increase in fair value from the options that were amended during the period.CBM Asia joint venture. Investor relations fees increased from $3,724 to $39,070. This is due to the Company commencing more investor relations activities with the engagement of Agoracom. Consulting fees increased from $9,750 to $92,500 as the result of an agreement that was signed with Aspen in September. Financing feescosts increased from $nil to $109,229$41,915 as thea result of increased promotion of the revaluation of several warrant grantsCompany during the period. All other expense groups do not significantly differ from the prior period.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 14 of 33 




FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE COMPANY’S FISCAL YEAR 2009,2011, ENDED ON 6/30/0911

All balances referred to in the following discussion are in US$ currency unless otherwise indicated.

Investments During Fiscal Year 2011 Ended on 6/30/0911- During the yearFiscal Year ended 6/30/09,11, the Company invested $1,446,904 in several different projects. The Company paid a cash deposit of $1,500,000 on signature of the definitive sales and purchase agreement relating to the Tungkal acquisition. On 4/9/09, the Company received a refund of $500,000 of this deposit due to the termination of the agreement. The Company also incurred $197,660 in legal fees and $100,000 as an expense deposit relating to the Tungkal acquisition. In consideration of a joint bid agreement on a resource property in Indonesia, the Company made a $100,000 interest free loan which was to be reimbursed under certain conditions if the bid is accepted. On 5/19/09, the Company received a refund of $95,000 of this deposit due to the termination of the agreement. The Company has also incurred $10,463 for it’s share of a data package relating to the joint bid. The Company incurred $122,028 related to its efforts to pursue biodiesel projects in Indonesia. The Company’s oil and gas property expenditures continue to be at a maintenance level until management decides to commence further exploration and development of its Indonesian properties. During the year, the Company spent $10,988 on the Bengara-II PSC, which costs were written off. There was an additional net expenditure of $765 on the purchase of computer equipment and software.

Finance During Fiscal Year 2011 Ended on 6/30/0911- During the yearFiscal Year ended 6/30/09, a total of 360,000 new shares were issued upon exercise of stock options for net proceeds to11, the Company received $30,000 from the issuance of $54,000. During the year ended 6/30/08, a total of 5,265,000 new shares were issued pursuantpromissory notes to private placements for net proceeds to the Company of $3,261,750. On 6/30/09, the Company had options outstanding granted to Directors, Officers and consultants to purchase an aggregate of 9,390,000 shares at prices ranging from $0.15 to $0.24 and expiring at varying dates between 12/31/10 and 12/ 31/11. On 6/30/09, the Company had warrants outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 13,990,000 shares at prices ranging from $0.15 to $1.00 and expiring at varying dates between 7/23/09 and 8/29/10.related parties.

Income During Fiscal Year 2011 Ended 6/30/0911- Overall, the Company had a loss from operations during the year ended 6/30/0911 of $3,128,587$1,893,765 compared to $3,116,762$1,275,386 in the year ended 6/30/08. The10.The Company had a loss per share (basic and diluted) of $0.05$0.03 in 20092011 compared to a loss per share of $0.05$0.02 in 2008. During the current period the Company generated $12,717 in interest income compared with $105,274 in the prior period. The decrease is due to lower cash balances on hand during the current period. The Company wrote off its property acquisition costs related to the Tungkal acquisition and the South Bengara-II acquisition amounting to $1,313,123 and its investment in Continental Biofuels amounting to $122,029 during the year ended 6/30/09.2010.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 15 of 33





Expenses During Fiscal Year 2011 Ended on 6/30/0911- General and administrative expenses decreasedincreased by $1,372,649$632,965 from $3,088,663$1,273,922 to $1,716,014$1,906,887 for the yearsFiscal Years ended 6/30/0810 and 6/30/0911 respectively. The significant changes to general and administrative expenses are as follows. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense, relatingfollows: Most significantly, non-cash financing fees increased from $79,008 to management and consulting contracts, of $376,127 for the year ended 6/30/09 compared to $1,167,688 in the year ended 6/30/08 for a decrease of $791,561. Office expenses decreased $143,977 from $279,548 to $135,571$1,115,458 as the Dallas office was closedresult of the revaluation of 10,000,000 warrants during the year and less data software was purchased.year. The majority of the other expenditure items in this category decreased from 2011 to 2010; including consulting fees that decreased $10,000 from $92,500 to $82,500 as a result of the termination of the agreement with Aspen Capital Partners during the current year. Cash financing fees decreased from $14,800 to $nil as there were no private placements completed during the current year. Investor relations costs decreased by $124,571 from $128,295$39,070 to $3,724. In$nil as a result of the termination of two agreements during the previous Fiscal Year. Management fees, salaries and wages decreased $87,166 from $369,890 to $282,724 as a result of the termination of an employment contract during the prior year, two investor relations contractsyear. Professional fees decreased $66,567 from $161,010 to $94,443 as a result of lower legal fees during the current year. Rent, office maintenance and advertising contracts were signed, and additional conferences were attended by Company’s management. All other expense groups do not significantly differutilities decreased $20,595 from the prior period.

FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE COMPANY’S FISCAL YEAR 2008, ENDED 6/30/08

All balances referred$51,447 to $30,852 as a result of reduced corporate activity in the following discussion are in US$ currency unless otherwise indicated.

Investments Duringcurrent Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/08- DuringYear. Stock based compensation decreased $138,813 from $279,766 to $140,953 as the year ended 6/30/08, the Company invested $100,000 for a 40% stake in a company named Continental Biofuels Corporation in order to pursue biodiesel projects in Indonesia. The Company also spent $32,760 on exploration expenditures relating to its Indonesian properties and $61,761 on equipment purchases mainly relating to computer and computer software. During the year ended 6/30/07, the Company invested $259,886 in its Indonesian oil & gas properties and recovered $146,500 from its farm out partner, GeoPetro. The prior year amount includes the proceeds from the sale of CGB2 shares in the amount of $21,000 as well as equipment purchases of $55,574 and the write-off of costs related to CGB2 of $8,858.

Finance During Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/08- During the year ended 6/30/08, the Company issued 5,265,000 shares for gross proceeds to the Company of $3,309,750. There were no Stock Options or Warrants exercisedonly stock option activity during the current year ended 6/30/08. Duringwas the year ended 6/30/07 there were 3,330,000 Stock Optionsrevaluation of previously granted stock options. Travel and 2,823,334 Warrants exercised, and 111,111 shares issued for services generating proceedsaccommodation expenditures decreased $24,174 from $43,116 to the company of $1,136,333. On 6/30/08, the Company had options outstanding granted to Directors, Officers and consultants to purchase an aggregate of 11,250,000 shares at prices ranging from $0.15 to $0.65 and expiring at varying dates between 4/30/09 and 5/25/11. On 6/30/08, the Company had warrants outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 13,990,000 shares at prices ranging from $0.15 to $1.00 and expiring at varying dates between 7/23/09 and 8/29/10.

Income During Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/08- Overall, the Company had a loss from operations during the year ended 6/30/08 of $3,116,762 compared to a loss of $2,603,000 during the year ended 6/30/07. The Company had a loss per share (basic and diluted) of $0.05 in 2008 compared to a loss per share of $0.04 in 2007. During the year ended 6/30/08, the Company generated $105,274 in interest income compared with $81,995 during the year ended 6/30/07. The Company’s portion of the loss sustained in Continental Biofuels since inception to 6/30/08 was $82,184. The Company wrote down the investment in Continental Biofuels at 6/30/08 as the company was dissolved subsequent to the year-end. During the year ended 6/30/08, the Company also wrote down resource property costs in the amount of $32,760 compared to $113,386 during the year ended 6/30/07.$18,942.

Continental Energy Corp. B.2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 15 of 33 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES.




Expenses During Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/08- General and administrative expenses increased by $477,409 from $2,611,254 to $3,088,663 for the years ended 6/30/07 and 2008 respectively. The significant changes to general and administrative expenses are as follows. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense, relating to management and consulting contracts, of $1,167,688 for the year ended 6/30/08 compared to $673,242 for the year ended 6/30/07. During the year, the Company amended the terms of certain share purchase warrants outstanding. The Company has recorded the fair value of the amended warrants as financing fees, being $279,256 for 2008 compared to $112,723 for 2007. Management fees increased by $31,484 from $740,522 in 2007 to $772,006 in 2008. Consulting fees were down $95,701 to $32,200 compared with $127,901 in the prior year. The Company utilized more consultants in the prior period. Rent decreased by $35,910 from $89,986 to $5 4,076. Travel decreased by $102,149 from $238,229 to $136,080. The current year travel costs are consistent with fiscal 2006 levels. Investor relations decreased by $40,601 from $168,896 in 2007 to $128,295 in 2008. The decrease is due to the Company attending fewer conferences during the current year. Office expenses increased by $103,658 from $175,890 in 2007 to $279,548 in 2008. The increase in office expenses for the current year relates to purchases in the amount of $150,000 for subscriptions to a worldwide oil and gas exploration database. Professional fees decreased by $61,702 from $203,811 to $142,109. All other expense groups appear consistent with the comparative period and some decreased slightly.

B.  LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES.

Cash on hand is sufficient to fund the Company’s overhead costs and exploration objectivesnew business development costs for the immediate future. The Company intends to focus its efforts on acquisitionacquisitions of oil and gas producingnew properties to generate revenue. The Company also intends to conduct additional fund raising activities during Fiscal 2010.2014.

C.RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.

We do not currently, and did not previously, have research and development policies in place. Over the past three fiscal years,Fiscal Years, no funds were expended by our Company on research and development activities.

D.  TREND INFORMATION.

D.TREND INFORMATION.

We do not currently know of any market trends that would be material to our operations.

E.  OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS.

E.OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 16 of 33

F.  TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.





F.TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.

The table below reflects our “Short Term” (at least one year), “Mid Term” (two to three years) and “Long Term” (over three years) debt and fixed contractual obligations for the upcoming five fiscal years:Fiscal Years:

Continental Energy Corp. 2010 Annual Report on Form 20F Page 16 of 33 




Contractual Obligations as at 6/30/1013
ObligationTotalShort TermMid TermLong Term
Debt Principalnilnilnilnil
Debt Service Interestnilnilnilnil
Non CancelableNon-Cancelable Leasesnilnilnilnil
Environmental liabilitiesnilnilnilnil
Asset Retirement Obligationsnilnilnilnil
Property Work Commitmentsnilnilnilnil
Totalsnilnilnilnil

G.  SAFE HARBOR.

G.SAFE HARBOR.

The safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act (“statutory safe harbors”) shall apply to forward-looking information provided pursuant to Item 5.E and 5.F.

ITEM6.-6 : DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES ANDTHEIRCOMPENSATION

A.DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.

A.  DIRECTORS ANDOFFICERS.

DIRECTORS

- The term "Directors" as used herein includes and is limited to those persons duly elected or appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company in the manner provided for in the Company’s articles of association and in accordance with applicable law.

Directors

Board of Directors

Director’s Name

Type of Director

Age

Date First


Appointed

Committee


Memberships

Experience


(See details
below)

Name and Symbol of Other Public


Company of Which He is Also a Director

Richard L. McAdoo

Executive Director & CEO

56

59

1/99

Compensation,


& Reserves

Geologist1

None

Robert V. Rudman

Executive Director & CFO

63

66

12/09

Audit & Reserves

Businessman &

Accountant3

Innovative Software Technologies, Inc.(INIV:PK)

None

David T.W. Yu

Non-Executive Director

55

59

5/05

Audit &


Compensation

Businessman2

Apolo Gold & Energy Inc.(OTC:
Apolo (OTCPink: APLL)

Phillip B. Garrison

Non-Executive Director

57

60

9/07

Audit &


Compensation

Businessman &


Accountant
3

None

Johnny ChristiansenNon-Executive Director596/13--BusinessmanNone

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 17 of 33








2.     

Executive Director - Robert V. Rudmanis a Canadian Chartered Accountant, a former auditor with the firm of Price Waterhouse Coopers and a proven professional with more than thirty years of hands-on experience in the management and analysis of companies. As a senior member of Canadian and U.S. financial advisory firms, Mr. Rudman has been instrumental in arranging a wide range of debt and equity financings, in structuring a number of mergers and acquisitions, in developing strategic and operational business plans, and in the preparation and filing of all required regulatory reports. Mr. Rudman’s scope of experience includes both domestic and international transactions. His focus has been on the challenges facing early stage public companies. As an officer and Director of an emerging high technology public company for a period of twelve years, Mr. Rudman served as its CFO, CEO, and later as the Chairman of the Board.

3.     

Non-Executive Director - David T.W. Yuis a resident of Hong Kong, and is an experienced independent financial professional with thirty years experience in the securities, commodities, bullion, and foreign exchange trading business in Hong Kong. He has been employed by Rothschild & Sons, Shearson American Express, and Citibank. Recently Mr. Yu has led negotiations that led to long term intergovernmental oil supply agreements between the Chinese government and oil producing nations in Africa in exchange for Chinese government backed investment in economic development, trade and infrastructure projects. He is currently working on similar deals in South America and in Indonesia.

4.     

Non-Executive Director - Phillip B. Garrisonis a resident of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. He is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma and holds an MBA from Southern Methodist University. He is a CPA registered in Texas. He is a past President of the American Business Council in Dubai and is a trustee of the American School of Dubai. He began his career in 1975 in the Oklahoma City office of the public accounting firm of Arthur Young and Company (now Ernst & Young) before eventually becoming the Director of Tax in its Hong Kong office. In 1987 he joined Caltex (a Chevron-Texaco joint venture company) in its Irving, Texas office before being posted to Caltex’s Dubai office in 1994. After serving in various regional positions he was appointed Managing Director - Gulf Region responsible for all aspects of Caltex downstream and marketing activities in the Middle East. In 2001 he founded Downstream Developments Inc. in Dubai and consults on and dev elops ventures for transportation and logistics, oil and gas infrastructure projects, and petroleum product marketing. Recently he has worked with the Falcon Group of Dubai, a FEDEX subcontractor in the Middle East and North Africa, as its Managing Director - Ground, where he ran operations for land express cargo and logistics services. He is presently working with Specialist Group Dubai as its executive officer in charge of operations for its British Military contracts providing logistics, bulk fuels transportation, and waste management services in Iraq and other parts of the Middle East region.

OFFICERS

The term "Officers" as used herein includes and is limited to those senior managers or executive managers who are either Chairman, President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, CEO, COO, or CFO of the Company or hold position of similar capacity in wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Continental Energy Corp. 2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20F for FYE 2013Page 18 of 33





Officers

Officers

Officer’s Name

Positions Held

Age

Date First


Appointed

Experience


(See below for details)

Other Directorships of Other Public


Companies or Related Parties

Richard L. McAdoo1

Chairman & CEO

56

59

1/99

Geologist

None

Andrew T. Eriksson 2

President & COO

37

4/09

Geologist

None

Robert V. Rudman 32

CFO

63

66

9/09

Businessman &


Chartered Accountant

1-Aspen Capital Partners LLC

2-Innovative Software Technologies, Inc. (INIV:PK)

None

Notes to table:

(1)

A full time employee of the Company who spends substantially all of his time on the affairs of the Company and its subsidiaries. He is also a Director and President COO of the Company’s 50% owned Indonesian joint venture company CG Xploration Inc. and up to its sale in 7/10 was managing Director of the Company’s wholly-owned Singaporean subsidiary Continental Energy Pte. Ltd.

(2)

A full time employee of the Company who spends substantially all of his time on the affairs of the Company and its subsidiaries. He is also a Director of the Company’s 18% owned Indonesian subsidiary: Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. and up to its sale in 7/10 was a Director of the Company’s wholly-owned Singaporean subsidiary Continental Energy Pte. Ltd. Prior to being appointed the Company’s President and COO, he was employed by the Company as its exploration manager since 5/03.

(3)

A non-exclusive and part-time employee of the Company who devotes time as required to the affairs of the Company and its subsidiaries. He is also a Managing Director of Aspen Capital Partners LLC, a financial and management consultant engaged by the Company under a written contract which, among other things, provides for the provision of the personal services of Mr. Rudman as the Company’s CFO.subsidiaries He is also a Canadian Chartered Accountant.

1.

Richard L. McAdoo is the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer or CEO.See other details in the preceding section concerning Directors experience.

B.2.

Robert V. Rudman is the Company’s Chief Financial Officer or CFO.See other details in the preceding section concerning Directors experience.

3.

Andrew T. Eriksson is the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer or COO.He holds a Bachelors degree in Geology from San Francisco State University and a Masters degree in Geology from Oregon State University. Andrew is a professional geologist with over 10 years experience in research and the international oil and gas exploration industry. He has responsible charge experience in oil and gas exploration and production including prospect generation, drilling and formation evaluation, field geology, and surface mapping. He has direct work experience in geologic basins throughout SE Asia and specific basins in Oregon and Russia.

COMPENSATION.

B.  COMPENSATION.

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain high performing senior executives, encourage and reward superior performance and align the executives’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders. Individual compensation may be based on individual experience and performance or other criteria deemed important by the Compensation Committee. In order to meet the Company’s objectives, executive compensation is guided by:

The Compensation Committee -The Company’s Board of Directors has delegated compensation matters to its Compensation Committee which from time to time reviews and recommends executive compensation to the Board of Directors for its approval. The Compensation Committee uses discretion and judgment when determining compensation levels as they apply to a specific executive.

Compensation Elements -An executive compensation policy has been established to acknowledge and reward the contributions of the executive Officers to the Company’s success and to ensure competitive compensation, in order that the Company may benefit from the expertise required to pursue its objectives. The Company’s executive compensation policy is comprised of both fixed and variable components. The variable components include equity and non-equity incentive plans. Each compensation component has a different function, but all elements are intended to work in concert to maximize Company and individual performance by establishing specific, competitive operational and financial goals and by providing financial incentives to employees based on their level of attainment of these goals. The Company’s current executive compensation program is comprised of the following four basic components:

1.

base salary;

2.

non-equity incentives—consisting of a cash bonus linked to both individual and corporate performance;

3.

long-term compensation—consisting of stock options granted under the Company’s formal stock option plan; and

4.

other elements of compensation—consisting of benefits and perquisites.


Continental Energy Corp.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 19 of 33




Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 19 of 33





Compensation on Termination -There are no Company policies providing for, and no provisions in the Company’s employment agreements with its Officers or employees for, incremental payments to be made to them by the Company in the event of termination of their employment “Without Cause”.

Compensation on Change of Control of Company -There are no Company policies providing for, and no provisions in the Company’s employment agreements with its Officers or employees for incremental payments to be made to them by the Company in the event of termination of their employment on the event of any “Change of Control” of the Company.

Compensation of Directors- The-The Company has no standard arrangement pursuant to which Directors are compensated by the Company for their services solely in their capacity as Directors except for the granting from time to time of incentive stock options in accordance with the Company’s Stock Option Plan and except for compensation paid to Directors who are also executive Officers. No cash compensation was paid to any Director of the Company for the Director’s services as a Director during the most recently completed financial year, other than the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.

COMPENSATION OFOFFICERS ANDDIRECTORS INFISCAL2010Compensation of Officers and Directors- During the most recently completed financial year of the Company, the Company compensated its Directors and Officers as set forth in the following table. The Company reports its financial statements in US dollars and therefore all amounts therein are reported in US dollars.

Continental Energy Corp.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 20 of 33


Summary Table - Compensation of Directors and Officers During Fiscal 2010

2013

Name and Principal Position


Position

Fiscal Year Ended


Ended

Salary

Share-Based Awards


Options GrantedAwards(1)

Options
Granted(1)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation


Compensation

Pension Contributions


Contributions

All Other Compensation


Compensation

Total Compensation


Compensation
(US$)

Annual

Long-Term

OfficersOFFICERS

Richard L. McAdoo


Chairman & CEO

30-JUN-1030-JUN-13

$120,000150,000

Nil

$13,0986,699(2)(1)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

$133,098156,699

Andrew T. Eriksson

President & COO

30-JUN-10

$90,000

Nil

$15,495(2)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

$105,495

Robert V. Rudman


CFO

30-JUN-1030-JUN-13

Nil$120,000

Nil

$71,9606,699(2)(1)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

$71,960126,699

Non-Executive DirectorsNON-EXECUTIVE


DIRECTORS

Fees

Fees

Johnny Christiansen
Non-Executive Director

30-JUN-13NilNilNilNilNilNilNilNil
Philip B. Garrison


Non-Executive Director

30-JUN-1030-JUN-13

Nil

Nil

$13,098 (2)Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

$13,098Nil

David T.W. Yu


Non-Executive Director

30-JUN-1030-JUN-13

Nil

Nil

$13,098 (2)Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

$13,098Nil

Notes to the table:

1     

AtWhen applicable the current share price at the Report Date, all of the stock options disclosed in the above table are in the money.

2

The value of the option-basedshare-based and options awards reflects the fair value of options granted on the dates of grant. The fair value wasis computed using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: a) average risk-free interest rate of 0.37;rate; b) expected 1.97-yearyears of life of the option; c) the price of the stock on the grant date of $0.05;date; d) expected volatility of 87.93%;as a percentage; and e) no expected dividend payments. The Black Scholes model wasis used to compute option fair values because it is the most commonly used option pricing model and is considered to produce a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 20 of 33

C.  BOARD PRACTICES.





C.BOARD PRACTICES.

Election of Directors- The Directors of the Company are elected at each annual general meeting and hold office until the next annual general meeting. In the event or resignation of a sitting Director, the Board of Directors may act to appoint a replacement Director who shall serve until the next general meeting. The Company is currently authorized to have up to fourfive Directors. Our last annual general meeting was held on 12/11/30/09,12, at which then retiring incumbent Directors McAdoo, Garrison, Yu and YuRudman were each re-elected and Director Rudman was newly elected. Our next annual general meeting is scheduled for 12/10/10.re-elected. Each of our Directors holds office until the next annual general meeting of the Company, unless his office is earlier vacated under any of the relevant provisions of our articles or the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia).

Audit Committee- The Board of Directors has created an "Audit Committee" and duly appointed Executive Director Robert V. Rudman and non-executive Directors Garrison and Yu to serve on the Audit Committee. Non-Executive Director Garrison is a CPA. The Audit Committee is charged with the responsibility of coordinating, reviewing and working with the Company’s auditors with respect to the annual fiscal year-endFiscal Year end audit. The Company’s CFO serves as the Audit Committee’s chairman. As at the Report Date the Compensation Committee does not consist of the entire Board of Directors.

Additional Audit Committee Disclosure- National Instrument 52-110 of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 52-110”) requires the Company, as a venture issuer, to disclose annually in its Information Circular certain information concerning the constitution of its audit committee and its relationship with its independent auditor, as set forth in the following.




  • External Auditor Service Fees -Disclosure of the fees billed by the Company’s external auditor for services provided in auditing the Company’s annual financial statements for the subject year is set out in Item 16 – Principal Accountant Fees and Services in this Form 20-F.Form-20F.

  • Exemption -The Company is relying on the exemption provided by section 6.1 of NI 52-110 which provides that the Company, as a venture issuer, is not required to comply with Part 3 (Composition of the Audit Committee) and Part 5 (Reporting Obligations) of NI 52-110.

  • Executive Compensation Committee- The Board of Directors has created a "Compensation Committee" and duly appointed executive Director McAdoo and non-executive Directors Garrison and Yu serve on the Compensation Committee. The committee is charged with the responsibility to review and recommend contracts and terms of compensation to be paid to Company management. Mr. McAdoo serves as the committee’s chairman. As at the Report Date the Compensation Committee does not consist of the entire Board of Directors.

    Reserves Committee- The Board of Directors has created a "Reserves Committee" and duly appointed executive Director McAdoo and although not a Director,consisting of the Company’s President and COO, Andrew T. Eriksson, to serve on the Reserves Committee due to his technical qualifications.Executive Directors. The Reserves Committee is charged with the responsibility of oversight of the Company's oil and gas reserves and activity reporting in compliance with Canadian regulatory practices under National Instrument 51. The purpose of the Reserves Committee is to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities with respect to annual and interim reviews of the Company's oil and gas reserves. The responsibilities of the Reserves Committee include (i) if required, recommending to the Board the preferred independent evaluators and the terms of the engagement; (ii) if required, reviewing the Corporation's procedures for providing information to the independent evaluator with respect to its oi loil and gas reserves; (iii) reviewing the Corporation's procedures relating to the disclosure of information with respect to its reserves; (iv) ensuring that the Corporation complies with regulatory and legal requirements; (v) signing off on the year end reserve evaluation; and (vi) generally ensure that all actions necessary have been taken to conform to regulatory and legal requirements.

    D.  EMPLOYEES.

    D.EMPLOYEES.

    During Fiscal 2010,2013 and up to the Report Date, in addition to its Officers, the Company had 122 full time employees, and 2 part time employees,who were all located at the Company’s Indonesia representative office in Jakarta or its field office in Tanjung Selor.Jakarta. Of these employees 6 are geoscientists and technical support staff, two areone is accounting staff and the remainderothers are administrative and support staff. None of the Company’s employees are represented by a union.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 21 of 33

    E.  SHARE OWNERSHIP BYDIRECTORS ANDOFFICERS.





    E.SHARE OWNERSHIP BY DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.

    The table below lists, as at the Report Date, the number of voting securities owned directly or indirectly by all Directors and Officers. The common share voting rights of our Directors and Officers do not differ from those of any other shareholders. The amounts of common shares shown do not include those common shares that a Director or Officer may yet acquire upon exercise of any outstanding options or warrants.

    Voting Shares Owned by Directors And Officers

    Voting Shares Owned by Directors And Officers

    Voting Shares Owned by Directors And Officers

    Type of Security

    Name of

    Beneficial Owner

    Number of Voting

    Securities Owned

    % of Total Voting Securities Issued

    Name ofNumber of Voting% of Total Voting
    Beneficial OwnerSecurities OwnedSecurities Issued

    Common Shares

    Richard L. McAdoo, Director & CEO

    4,829,158

    6.6 %

    Richard L. McAdoo, Director & CEO9,579,1587.7 %

    Common Shares

    David T.W. Yu, Director

    3,833,334

    5.3 %

    Robert V. Rudman, Director &CFO3,752,0003.0 %

    Common Shares

    Phillip B. Garrison, Director

    0

     0.0 %

    David T.W. Yu, Director3,833,3343.1 %

    Common Shares

    Andrew T. Eriksson, COO

    1,465,000

    2.0 %

    Phillip B. Garrison, Director00.0 %

    Common Shares

    Robert Rudman, Director & CFO

    2,000

    0.1 %

    Johnny Christiansen, Directora20,000,00016.2 %

    Directors & Officers as a Group

    10,129,492

    14.0 %

     

     

     

     

    Directors & Officers as a Group37,164,49230.0 %

    Common Shares

    Total Issued & Outstanding

    72,390,381

    100 %

    Total Issued & Outstanding123,615,381100.0 %

     

    Continental Energy Corp.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FNote:Page 22aThese shares are owned by Visionaire Invest AS. They are controlled by Mr. Christiansen by virtue of 33him owning a 29% stake in Visionaire Invest AS and being its CEO.




    Incentive Stock Options Held by Directors and Officers- The table below lists, as at the Report Date, the number of stock options held by each Director and Officer. Incentive stock options are granted to the Company’s management, employees, and consultants in accordance with our formal written Stock Option Plan that is described in more detail in Section-6.B. The Stock Option Plan currently in effect was approved by our shareholders at our annual general meeting held on 12/12/08. The number of options held by Directors and Officers as a group plus those options held by other employees and consultants as a group is also shown.

    Stock Options Held by Directors and Officers

    Name of Optionee

    Directors & Officers

    US$ Option

    Exercise Price

    Date Option

    Expires

    Number of

    Options

    Percent

    Of Total

    Richard McAdoo

    Director & CEO

    $0.07

    12/31/12

    1,000,000

    9.3%

    David T.W. Yu

    Director

    $0.07

    12/31/12

    1,000,000

    9.3%

    Phillip B. Garrison

    Director

    $0.07

    12/31/12

    1,000,000

    9.3%

    Andrew T. Eriksson

    President & COO

    $0.07

    12/31/11

    160,000

    9.3%

    $0.07

    12/31/12

    840,000

    Robert Rudman

    Director & CFO

    $0.07

    12/31/12

    1,000,000

    9.3%

    Total Directors & Officers as a Group

    5,000,000

    46.5%

    Other Optionees as a Group

    $0.07 to $0.15

    Various

    5,750,000

    53.5%

    Total Stock Options Outstanding at the Report Date

    10,750,000

    100.0%

    Stock Options Held by Directors and Officers
    Name of Optionee
    Directors & Officers
    US$ Option
    Exercise Price
    Date Option
    Expires
    Number of
    Options
    Percent
    Of Total
    Richard McAdoo, Director & CEO$0.0512/31/155,000,00031.7%
    Robert Rudman, Director &CFO$0.0512/31/155,000,00031.7%
    David T.W. Yu, Director$0.0512/31/151,000,0006.3%
    Phillip B. Garrison, Director$0.0512/31/151,000,0006.3%
     Total Directors & Officers as a Group12,000,00076.0%
    Other Optionees as a Group$0.0512/31/153,800,00024.0%
     Total Stock Options Outstanding at the Report Date15,800,000100.0%

    ITEM7.-7 : MAJORSHAREHOLDERS ANDRELATEDPARTYTRANSACTIONS

    Authorized Share Capital- The authorized capital of the Company consists of One Billion (1,000,000,000) shares divided into Five Hundred Million (500,000,000) common shares without par value and Five Hundred Million (500,000,000) preferred shares without par value.

    Authorized Common Shares- All of the 500,000,000 authorized common shares of the Registrant are of the same class and, once issued, rank equally as to dividends, voting powers, and participation in assets. Holders of common shares are entitled to one vote for each share held of record in all matters to be acted upon by the shareholders. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors, in its discretion, out of funds legally available therefore.

    Authorized Preferred Shares- The authorized capital of the Registrant includes 500,000,000 preferred shares. The Board of Directors, using its own discretion, may from time to time by resolution, alter the Articles of the Company to divide the preferred shares into special series or classes of preferred shares in differing amounts of preferred shares having separate special terms and conditions attached to each such series. The Directors may create and designated a particular series of preferred shares, fix the number of preferred shares to be included in such designated series, and determine the consideration for which any series is to be sold or issued. Further, the Directors may create, define and attach special rights and restrictions to the preferred shares of any particular series including, rates and other conditions of any dividends; the rights and terms of provisions for cancellation, redemption, conversion, exchange, and/or retraction of the series; a ndand the terms and conditions of any voting rights or restrictions. Holders of preferred shares shall be entitled, on the distribution of assets of the Company or on the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, to receive before any distribution to be made to holders of common shares or any other series or class of shares capital ranking junior to the preferred shares as specifically provided in the special rights and restrictions attached to any particular series of the preferred shares issued.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 22 of 33





    Issued and Outstanding Share Capital- At the Company’s most recently completed Fiscal 20102013 year end on 6/30/1013 the total number of common shares issued and outstanding was 72,390,381.122,815,381. As of the Report Date the total number of common shares issued and outstanding was 72,390,381.123,615,381. Zero preferred shares were issued at Fiscal 2010 year-end2013 year end and none are issued as of the Report Date. The authorized and issued share capital of the Company is summarized in the table below.

    Authorized And Issued Share Capital

    Authorized And Issued Share Capital

    Authorized And Issued Share Capital

    Authorized

    Share Capital

    Authorized

    Share Capital

    Issued and Outstanding

    Share Capital

    Authorized
    Share Capital
    Issued and Outstanding
    Share Capital

    Type of Security

    Number of

    Shares

    Last Audited

    Year End 6/30/10

    Last Unaudited

    Quarter End 9/30/10

    At The Report Date

    11/26/10

    Number of
    Shares
    Last Audited
    Year End 6/30/13
    Last Unaudited
    Month End 4/30/14
    At The Report Date

    Common Shares

    500,000,000

    72,390,381

    72,390,381

    72,390,381

    500,000,000122,815,381123,615,381

    Preferred Shares

    500,000,000

    0

    500,000,0000

    Fully Diluted Basis Shareholding- As at the Report Date, on a fully diluted basis, there are101,108,381155,877,881common shares of the Company either issued or allocated under unexercised outstanding options, warrants, and warrants.debt conversion rights. This fully-diluted total includes72,390,381123,615,381common shares actually issued and outstanding plus17,968,00011,462,500outstanding unexercised warrants, and plus10,750,00015,800,000outstanding unexercised options to purchase additional common shares, plus5,000,000outstanding unexercised rights to convert against a promissory note; all as summarized in the table below.

    Fully Diluted Shareholding
    Type of SecurityLast Audited
    Year End 6/30/13
    Last Unaudited
    Month End 4/30/14
    At The Report Date
    Common Shares122,815,381123,615,381123,615,381
    Warrants11,555,50011,462,50011,462,500
    Options15,800,00015,800,00015,800,000
    Debt Conversion Rights5,000,0005,000,0005,000,000
    Fully Diluted Total155,170,881155,877,881155,877,881

    Continental Energy Corp.A.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 23 of 33MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS.




    Fully Diluted Shareholding

    Type of Security

    Last Audited

    Year End 6/30/10

    Last Unaudited

    Quarter End 9/30/10

    At The Report Date

    11/26/10

    Common Shares

    72,390,381

    72,390,381

    72,390,381

    Warrants

    17,968,000

    17,968,000

    17,968,000

    Options

    10,750,000

    10,750,000

    10,750,000

    Fully Diluted Total

    101,108,381

    101,108,381

    101,108,381

    A.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS.

    Definition of Major Shareholder- As used herein the term “Major Shareholder” refers to beneficial owners of 5% or more of each class of the Company’s voting securities, including our common shares. As at the Report Date the Company has one class of common shares outstanding, of which72,390,381123,615,381are issued and entitled to vote.

    Voting Rights- The voting rights of our Major Shareholders do not differ from the voting rights of shareholders who are not Major Shareholders.

    List of Major Shareholders- To the knowledge of the Directors and Officers of the Company, no person beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over common shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all issued and outstanding shares of the Company at the Report Date except for those Major Shareholders who, together with their respective share holdings, are listed in the following table:

    Major Shareholders

    Major Shareholders

    Major Shareholders

    Type of Security

    Name of Major Shareholder

    Voting Shares Owned

    % of Total

    Name of Major ShareholderVoting Shares Owned% of Total

    Common Shares

    Richard L. McAdoo(1)

    4,829,158

    6.7 %

    Mr. J.A. Khan(1)15,000,00012.1 %

    Common Shares

    David T.W. Yu(2)

    3,833,334

    5.3 %

    Mr. R. L. McAdoo(2)9,579,1587.7 %

    Common Shares

    Macquarie Bank Ltd. (3)

    5,250,000

    7.3 %

    Visionaire Invest AS(3)20,000,00016.2 %

    Major Shareholders as a Group

    13,912,492

     19.3 %

    Major Shareholders as a Group44,579,15836.0 %

    Common Shares

    CDS(4,6)

    38,404,872

    53.0%

    Total Issued & Outstanding4 123,615,381100.0 %

    Common Shares

    CEDE  & Co.(5,6)

    14,366,533

    19.7 %

    Common Shares

    Total Issued & Outstanding

    72,390,381

    100.0 %

    Notes to Table:

    1

    Major Shareholder, Malaysian businessman

    2     

    Major Shareholder, Executive Director, Chairman, and CEO of the Company.

    23     

    Major Shareholder, Non Executive and Independent Director of the Company.

    3     

    Major Shareholder.Private Norwegian holding company

    4     

    Canadian Depository for Securities, Inc., a CanadianDoes not included shares held by nominee securities depositorydepositories CDS and clearing house for banks, brokers, and institutions.

    5     

    American nominee ofCEDE as described in the Depository Trust Company, a nominee securities depository and clearing house for banks, brokers, and institutions.

    6     

    following section. The Company is not aware of the identities of unregistered shareholders and beneficial owners of the shares held by nominee depositories CDS or CEDE.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 23 of 33

    With





    Registered and Unregistered Shareholders -We estimate that the exceptiontotal number of Macquarie Bank Ltd. who purchased its shares through a private placementRegistered and Unregistered Shareholders of equity in the Company during Fiscal 2008 there have been no significant changes in Major Shareholders and no significant changes in the number of shares held by each Major Shareholder during the last three Fiscal Years.

    Other Shareholders -Basedto total about 990, based on the following assumptions we estimate that the number of other shareholders of the Company, the amounts of shares each holds, and the geographic distribution of their residence as follows:assumptions:




    Geographic Distribution of Shareholders- We estimate the location of Registered Shareholders from the registered certificate addresses provided by our transfer agent. In the case of Unregistered Shareholders we presume that the shares held by Canadian depository CDXCDS represent Canadian or other Non-US holders and we presume that shares held at CEDE are attributable to USA resident holders although we have no way of knowing these facts as certain.

    Therefore As at the 4/17/14 record date of our annual general meeting we estimate that 26% of our shareholders are located in the number of shareholders of the Company, the amounts of shares held,USA, another 33% in Canada, and the geographic distribution of our Registered Shareholders, Unregistered Shareholders, and nominee depositories as shownremaining 41% in the following table:other countries.

    ESTIMATE OF NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION OF SHAREHOLDERS

     

    Canadian

    Residents

    Other Nation

    Residents

    USA

    Residents

    Total

     

    Number

    of Holders

    Shares

    Held

    Number

    of Holders

    Shares

    Held

    Number

    of Holders

    Shares

    Held

    Number

    of

    Holders

    Shares

    Held

    Registered

    Shareholders

    48

    1,835,359

    35

    11,993,834

    95

    5,789,783

    178

    19,618,976

    Estimate of Unregistered Shareholders

    300

    --

    100

    --

    300

    --

    700

    --

    CDS Depository, Canada

    1

    38,404,872

    --

    --

    --

    --

    1

    38,404,872

    CEDE Depository, USA

    --

    --

    --

    --

    1

    14,366,533

    1

    14,366,533

    Totals

    349

    40,240,231

    135

    11,993,834

    396

    20,156,316

    880

    72,390,381

    Control- To the extent known to the Company, the Company is not owned or controlled directly or indirectly by another corporation, or by any foreign government, or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly, other than disclosed herein.

    Change of Control- To the extent known to the Company, there are no arrangements, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.

    B.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.

    On 9/15/09 the Company entered into a 12-month contract with Aspen Capital Partners LLC (“Aspen”), a financial and management consultant to among other things, provide fund raising advice, other financial and investor relations services, and the personal services of Mr. Robert V. Rudman to act as the Company’s CFO. Mr. Rudman is a director of the Company and also a managing director of Aspen. The contract may be terminated with 30-days notice by either party. This contract is ongoing at the Report Date.

    B.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.

    During the fiscal yearFiscal Year ended 6/30/10,13, management, director and officer fees in the amount of $210,000$282,842 were paid or accrued to directors and officers of the Company and consulting fees in the amount of $92,500 were paid or accrued to a firm in which an officer of the Company is a managing director.Company. At fiscal yearFiscal Year end on 6/30/10, $152,50013, $260,925 was payable to officers of the Company relating to outstanding management fees. At the Record Date, $77,000fees and $27,107 was payable to an officer and director relating to cash advances made to the Company since 6/30/10.

    Except for the related party transaction described in the preceding paragraphs, and to the extent of the Company’s knowledge, during the Company’s preceding fiscal year-endedFiscal Year ended 6/30/1012 and up to the Report Date there were no loans, guarantees, transactions, or currently proposed transactions between the Company and

    (a)     

    enterprises that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, control or are controlled by, or are under common control with, the Company;

    (b)     

    associates (An associate is an unconsolidated enterprise in which the Company has a significant influence or which has significant influence over the Company);

    (c)     

    individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of the Company that gives them significant influence over the Company, and close members (Close members of an individual’s family are those that may be expected to influence, or be influenced by, that person in their dealings with the Company.) of any such individual’s family;

    (d)     

    Directors, Officers, and key management personnel, that is, those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company, including close members of such individuals’ families; and

    (e)     

    enterprises in which a substantial interest in the voting power is owned, directly or indirectly, by any person described in (c) or (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence. This includes enterprises owned by Directors or Major Shareholders of the Company and enterprises that have a member of key management in common with the Company. Significant influence over an enterprise is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the enterprise but is less than control over those policies.


    Continental Energy Corp.C.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 25 of 33INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL.




    C.  INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL.

    Since the end of the Company's Fiscal 20102013 year end, to the best of our knowledge, there are no transactions, or proposed transactions, which have materially affected or will materially affect the Company in which any auditors, experts, counsel, or independent advisors has had or will have any direct or material indirect interest.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 24 of 33





    ITEM8.-8 : FINANCIALINFORMATION

    A.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

    A.  CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS ANDOTHERFINANCIALINFORMATION.

    Preparation of Financial Statements- The Company prepares annual audited consolidated financial statements as at its year end date of 30 June. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. During the course of the Company’s fiscal yearFiscal Year, management prepares unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements as at September 30, December 31, and March 31 which are filed on SEDAR with the British Columbia Securities Commission within 60 days of the quarter’s end. These same quarterly statements are filed by the Company on EDGAR as Form-6K filings.

    SEDAR Filings- The Company makes continuous disclosure filings with Canadian securities regulators electronically via “SEDAR”, the "System for Electronic Document Archiving and Retrieval". The Company began filing electronically on SEDAR in 1997. Copies of the Company’s SEDAR filings, including our annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements and management discussion and analysis may be downloaded from the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com.

    Reporting Currency- Commencing for its 7/31/02 year-endyear end the Company adopted the U.S. currency as its reporting currency and has prepared its financial statements since then on that basis. The accounts of the Company are now prepared in U.S. dollars and the Company’s Canadian operations are translated into U.S. dollars under the temporal method.

    Canadian GAAP- ThePrior to and including the Company's Fiscal Year ended 6/30/11, the Company's financial statements arewere prepared in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the application of which, in the case of the Company, conformsconformed in all material respects for the periods presented with US GAAP, except as disclosed in footnotes to the financial statements.

    IFRS - International Financial Reporting Standards -The Canadian Accounting Standards Board announced its decision to replace Canadian GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) for all Canadian publicly accountable enterprises. The effective changeover date for the Company is 7/1/11, at which time Canadian GAAP ceased to apply for Continental and was replaced by IFRS. Following this timeline, the Company issued its first set of interim financial statements prepared under IFRS for the quarter ended9/30/11 including comparative IFRS financial results and an opening balance sheet as at 7/1/10. The first annual IFRS consolidated financial statements were prepared for the Fiscal year ended 6/30/12 with restated comparatives for the previous Fiscal Year ended 6/30/11. Commencing from 7/1/11, the Company's financial statements were prepared in accordance with IFRS. The Company’s audited financial statements for Fiscal 20102013 can be found under "Item 18 - Financial Statements" in the annual report below.

    B.  SIGNIFICANTCHANGES.

    B.SIGNIFICANT CHANGES.

    Legal Proceedings- As of the Report Date, the Company knows of no material, active or pending legal proceedings against them; nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation.

    Cease Trade Orders- Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2013, the British Columbia Securities Commission issued the Company a cease trade order on 12/23/13 and the Alberta Securities Commission issued a cease trade order on 3/26/14. These orders were issued because the Company was at the time deficient in its regulatory requirements involving the filing of its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 6/30/13 and interim unaudited statements for the quarters ended 9/30/13 and 12/31/13. The orders prohibit trading of the Company’s securities in Canada until the deficiency is cured by the filing by the Company of the required financial reports and revocation orders have been issued by both Commissions. The Company has cured these deficiencies with its 4/23/14 filing on SEDAR of its audited annual financial statements for Fiscal 2013 and its subsequent filing, on 2/5/14, of interim statements for quarters ended 9/30/13 and 12/31/13. On 5/5/14 the Company filed for a revocation order with the Commissions. As at the Report Date, no approval has yet been received.

    Dividend Distributions- Holders of our common shares are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board, in its discretion, out of funds legally available for that purpose. The Company has not declared any dividends for the last five fiscal yearsFiscal Years and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 25 of 33





    ITEM9.-9 : THEOFFER ANDLISTING.

    A.  OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS.

    A.OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS.

    The Company's common shares trade on the NASD Electronic OTC Bulletin BoardOTCQB in the United States under the symbol "CPPXF", since 3/24/98. The following table lists the volume of trading and the high and low trading prices during the quarter and the end quarter closing sales price for the Company's common shares for the last eight fiscal quarters. The closing price of the common shares on the Report Date3/31/14 was $0.12.$0.04.

    For the Period

    Common Shares

    US$ Dollar Sales  Price

    Trading Volume

    High Price

    Low Price

    Closing Price

    Quarter Ended - 9/30/2010

    482,400

    $0.14

    $0.03

    $0.09

    Quarter Ended - 6/30/2010

    764,400

    $0.14

    $0.05

    $0.09

    Quarter Ended - 3/31/2010

    1,195,900

    $0.14

    $0.04

    $0.09

    Quarter Ended - 12/31/2009

    2,470,200

    $0.09

    $0.04

    $0.06

    Quarter Ended - 9/30/2009

    1,630,250

    $0.11

    $0.06

    $0.11

    Quarter Ended - 6/30/2009

    951,100

    $0.15

    $0.09

    $0.10

    Quarter Ended - 3/31/2009

    585,600

    $0.19

    $0.10

    $0.11

    Quarter Ended - 12/31/2008

    2,223,200

    $0.25

    $0.10

    $0.16

    For the PeriodCommon SharesUS$ Dollar Sales Price
    Trading VolumeHigh PriceLow PriceClosing Price
    Quarter Ended – 03/31/20142,600,489$0.06$0.01$0.04
    Quarter Ended - 12/31/20131,881,637$0.07$0.01$0.05
    Quarter Ended - 09/30/20131,798,978$0.10$0.02$0.04
    Quarter Ended - 06/30/20131,463,538$0.14$0.01$0.07
    Quarter Ended - 03/31/2013705,030$0.07$0.01$0.05
    Quarter Ended - 12/31/20122,324,721$0.05$0.01$0.03
    Quarter Ended - 09/30/20121,465,300$0.09$0.02$0.05
    Quarter Ended - 06/30/2012659,100$0.17$0.07$0.09

    B.  PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION.

    B.PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION.

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-9.B is not applicable.

    C.  MARKETS.

    C.MARKETS.

    Our common shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCQB under the symbol "CPPXF".

    Continental Energy Corp.D.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 26 of 33SELLING SHAREHOLDERS




    D.  SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-9.D is not applicable.

    E.  DILUTION.

    E.DILUTION.

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-9.E is not applicable.

    F.  EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE.

    F.EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE.

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-9.F is not applicable.

    ITEM10.-10 : ADDITIONALINFORMATION.

    A.SHARE CAPITAL.

    A.  SHARE CAPITAL.

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-10.A is not applicable.

    B.  MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.

    B.MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.

    The Company was incorporated in British Columbia, Canada, on 5/29/84 under the name "Intl. Focus Res. Inc." On 1/3/96 the name was changed to "Continental Copper Corporation". On 10/23/97 the name was changed to "Continental Energy Corporation". On 6/23/04, the Company was transitioned under the Business Corporation Act (British Columbia). At.At an annual general meeting of the shareholders on 1/25/06 the shareholders adopted an amended Articles to conform them to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), enacted in 2004, as it required. At a special general meeting of the shareholders on 9/10/08 the shareholders amended and adopted the Company’s current Articles.

    Set out below is a summary of various provisions of our Notice of Articles and Articles prescribed by the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) in respect of:(i) objects and purposes: (ii) directors; (iii) authorized capital; (iv) rights, preference and restrictions attached to our classes of shares; (v) shareholder meetings; and (vi) limitation on rights of non-Canadians; (vii) delay of change of control; and (viii) reporting of share ownership.

    Objects and Purposes-Neither our Notice of Articles or Articles contain a description of our objects and purposes.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 26 of 33





    Directors- Our Articles have provisions related to conflicts of interests of directors in certain corporate transactions. A director or senior officer who holds a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction into which the Company proposes to enter into, must disclose such interest and is liable to account to the Company for any profit that accrues to the director or senior offer as a result of the transaction if the provisions for disclosure and director approval set out in the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) are not complied with. A director with a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction is not entitled to vote on any directors’ resolution approving the contract or transaction, unless all directors have an interest in the contract or transaction. A director with a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction is entitled to be counted as part of the quorum for the directors’ meeting to consider the contract or transac tion.transaction. Under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), a director does not hold a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction merely because it relates to his/her compensation in his/her capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company..Company. Our Articles provide that our directors may, without shareholder approval, borrow money upon the credit of our company,Company, issue and sell bonds or debentures and provide guarantees. Neither our Notice of Articles or Articles set out a mandatory retirement age for our directors and our directors are not required to own securities of our companyCompany in order to serve as directors.

    Authorized Capital-Our Notice of Articles provide that our authorized capital consists of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, without par value, and 500,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without par value. Our preferred stock may be issued in one or more series and our directors may fix the number of shares which is to comprise each series and the designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to each series.

    Rights, Preferences and Restrictions-Pursuant to our Articles and the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), holders of our common stock are entitled to vote at all meetings of shareholders, except meetings at which only holders of a specified class of shares are entitled to vote, receive any dividend declared by our company'sCompany's board of directors and, subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to any other class of shares, receive the remaining property of our companyCompany upon dissolution. Shares of our preferred stock of each series rank on a parity with our share of preferred stock of any other series and are entitled to a preference over shares of our common stock with respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets or return of capital in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our company.Company. The provisions in our Articles attaching to our common stock and our preference stock may be al tered,altered, amended, repealed, suspended or changed by the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 2/3s of the outstanding shares of common stock and 2/3s of the shares of preferred stock, as applicable. With the exception of special resolutions (i.e. resolutions in respect of fundamental changes to our company,Company, including: the sale of all or substantially all of its assets, an merger or other arrangement or an alteration to our company'sCompany's authorized capital) that require the approval of 2/3s of the votes cast by shareholders (holding common stock) entitled to vote at a meeting, either in person or by proxy, resolutions to approve matters brought before a meeting of our shareholders require approval by a simple majority of the votes cast by shareholders entitled to vote at a meeting, either in person or by proxy.

    Shareholder Meetings-The Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) provides that:(i) meetings of shareholders must be held in British Columbia, unless otherwise provided in a company's Articles; (ii) directors must call an annual general of shareholders not later than 15 months after the last preceding annual general and once in every calendar year;(iii) for the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to receive notice of or vote at meetings of shareholders, the directors may fix in advance a date as the record date for that determination, provided that such date shall not precede by more than 50 days or by less than 21 days the date on which the meeting is to be held; (iv) a quorum of shareholders for a shareholder meeting may be set by the Articles and the Company’s Articles provide that the quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of our shareholders is two shareholders, or one or more proxy holder representing two members, or one member and proxy holder representing another member; (v) the holders of not less than five percent of the issued shares entitled to vote at a meeting may requisition the directors to call a meeting of shareholders for the purposes stated in the requisition; and (vii) upon the application of a director or shareholder entitled to vote at the meeting, the Supreme Court of British Columbia may order a meeting to be called, held and conducted in a manner that the Court directs.

    Continental Energy Corp.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 27 of 33




    Limitations on Rights of Non-Canadians-Except as provided in the Investment Canada Act, there are no limitations specific to the rights of non-Canadians to hold or vote our common stock under the laws of Canada or British Columbia or in our charter documents. See "Exchange Controls" below in this annual reportAnnual Report for a discussion of the principal features of the Investment Canada Act for non-Canadian residents proposing to acquire our common stock.

    Delay of Change of Control-Pursuant to the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), at each annual general meeting of our shareholders all of our directors retire and the shareholders appoint a new board of directors. Each director holds office until our next annual general meeting unless:(i) he dies or resigns; (ii) he is removed by ordinary resolution of our shareholders (or class or series of shareholders if such class or series has the exclusive right to elect one or more directors); or (iii) the director becomes disqualified to hold officer, as provided under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). A.A director appointed or elected to fill a vacancy on our board holds office for the unexpired term of his predecessor (generally, until our next annual general meeting). With.With the exception of provisions in our Articles that limit the number of directors that can be appointed between annual meetings of shareholders and th atthat give our directors the authority to issue blank check preferred stock, there are no provisions in our Notice of Articles or Articles that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company,Company, and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving our company.Company.

    Reporting of Share Ownership-Neither our Notice of Articles or Articles contain any provisions governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed. Securities legislation in Canada, however, requires that we disclose in our annual general meeting proxy statement, holders who beneficially own more than 10ten percent of our issued and outstanding shares, and United States Federal securities laws require the disclosure in our annual report on Form 20-FForm-20F of holders who own more than five percent of our issued and outstanding shares.

    C.MATERIAL CONTRACTS

    C.  MTGE AgreementATERIAL CONTRACTS- On 5/7/12, the Company acquired 300,000 shares, representing a 10% stake, of Tawau Green Energy Sdn. Bhd. ("TGE") for the sum of 6,000,000 Malaysian Ringgit (“MYR”) ($1,965,600). During Fiscal 2013, the TGE Agreement was terminated on 5/20/13 and the Company returned all 300,000 of the TGE shares and wrote off its investment in TGE. As at the Report Date, the TGE Agreement is no longer in force or effect.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 27 of 33





    The Bengara-II Production Sharing Contract (“PSC”)- On 12/04/97 Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. (“CGB2”) entered into a Production Sharing Contract (“PSC”) for the Bengara-II PSC contract area with the Minister of Mines and Energy of the Republic of Indonesia. CGB2 isPursuant to a news release dated 10/16/12, during Fiscal 2013, the sole owner of 100%Company announced that negotiations with the Indonesian government for an extension of the rights toBengara-II PSC's term had terminated. Consequently, as at the Bengara-II PSC. Management of operating activities in the Bengara-II contract area pursuant to the PSC is vested in CGB2 asReport Date the Bengara-II PSC "Operator". See disclosure abovehas been relinquished and allowed to expire in Item-4.D.c above entitled “PSC Leaseholds” for disclosureaccordance with its term.

    CBM Joint Study and Bid Group Agreement- On 5/5/12 the Company announced that it had entered into a Joint Study and Bid Group Agreement with CBM Asia Development Corp. ("CBM Asia") a Canadian CBM developer with existing CBM developments in Indonesia. Subsequent to the end of other termsFiscal 2012, the CBM Joint Venture agreement expired and terminated on 4/27/14 in accordance with its provisions. The exclusivity provisions of the Bengara-II PSC. Further:agreement remain in effect for an additional 1 year and the confidentiality provisions for an additional 2 years.

    1.     

    Bengara-II PSC Work Commitments- The Bengara-II PSC obliged CGB2 to drill 4 exploration wells and expend at least $25,000,000 on petroleum exploratory "Work Commitments" within the Bengara-II contract area during the initial 10-year exploration period ended 12/4/07. As at the end of the 10-year exploration period and at the Report Date this minimum Work Commitment has been exceeded and all 4 commitment wells drilled. Neither the Company nor CGB2 has any further funding commitments or obligations to Indonesian authorities with regard to the Bengara-II PSC Work Commitments.

    2.     

    Bengara-II PSC Term- In response to an application filed with Indonesian authorities and dated 11/22/07 to extend the initial 10-year exploration period of the Bengara-II PSC to enable it to 1) complete additional testing of the 4 wells drilled during 2007; 2) acquire additional 2D and 3D seismic in the Block; 3) conduct further appraisal and delineation drilling to more fully assess and appraise a promising indication of a possible discovery; and 4) based upon the results of the foregoing, file a Plan of Development ("POD") for additional government approval. In a letter from Indonesian authorities dated 2/9/09 CGB2 received an extension of the initial exploration period of the Bengara-II until 12/4/11. Further extensions may be granted by Indonesian authorities subject to further approval based on an annual review by Indonesian authorities of CGB2’s progress and results of appraisal work. At any time that CGB2 determines any commercial oil and gas develop ment within the Bengara-II PSC contract area is justified, it may submit an initial plan of development (“POD”) for the first oil or gas field in the block. Upon approval of such initial POD by government authorities then the Bengara-II Block may be held by CGB2 for the full PSC term of 30-years until 12/04/27.

    Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. (“CGB2”)Malaysia Joint Study and Bid Group Agreement –-On 11/12/13, subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a 50/50 joint bid arrangement with an established Malaysian partner to evaluate opportunities and present carefully selected bids for new oil and gas production sharing and risk service contracts offered in Malaysia by PETRONAS, the national oil company. At the Report Date, the Company owns 18% of the shares of CGB2. GeoPetro Resources Company (“GeoPetro”:NYSE Amex: GPR.A) owns 12% of the shares of CGB2. CNPC (Hong Kong) Ltd. (“CNPCHK”:HKSE: 0135.HK), through its wholly owned subsidiary CNPCHK (Indonesia) Ltd. (“CNPCHK-Indonesia”), owns 70% of the shares of CGB2.Malaysia Joint Study and Bid Group remains in effect.

    CGB2 Shares Sale and PurchaseIndonesian Bid Group Agreement (“SPA”)- During the fiscal year 2007,– On 2/4/13, the Company announced that it had entered into a SPA dated 9/29/06joint bid arrangement with GeoPetro, CNPCHK, and CNPCHK-Indonesia and GeoPetro pursuantanother local industry player to which the Company and GeoPetro each sold 70% of their respective shares of CGB2 to CNPCHK-Indonesia. CNPCHK is also a party to the SPA in its capacity as guarantor of the obligations thereunder of its wholly owned subsidiary CNPCHK-Indonesia. The Company retained an 18% share of CGB2. To earn its 70% stake in CGB2 CNPCHK paid $18,700,000 in cash into CGB2 which was used to paypresent bids for Fiscal 2008 drilling of 4 exploratory wells on the Bengara-II Block property. At the Report Date CNPCHK remains obliged to the Company under the SPA to, upon the approvalnew Indonesian production sharing contracts offered by Indonesian authorities of the first plan of development (“POD”) for any oil and gas discovery within the Bengara-II PSC contract area:authorities in 2013.

    1.     

    pay a cash bonus in the net amount of $3,000,000 to the Company; and


    Continental Energy Corp.D.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 28 of 33EXCHANGE CONTROLS.




    2.     

    provide low interest “Development Loans” funding to CGB2 to pay for additional appraisal and development work until the earlier of a) an additional amount of $41,300,000 over and above the $18,700,000 earning obligation funds has been expended or b) the month after the first commercial lifting of crude oil from the Bengara area is delivered and sold.

    CGB2 Share Holders Agreement (“SHA”)- The relationship of the Company, GeoPetro, and CNPCHK-Indonesia as the sole three shareholders of CGB2, owner of the Bengara-II PSC, is governed by a SHA dated 9/29/06. CNPCHK is also a party to the SHA in its capacity as guarantor of the obligations thereunder of its wholly owned subsidiary CNPCHK-Indonesia. Among other things, the SHA contains provisions specifying that:

    1.     

    CGB2 is obliged to externally finance and fund all its own working capital requirements. There are no contractual provisions in the SHA or the SPA for CGB2 to impose a funding obligation or place cash calls on the Company, or any other CGB2 shareholder, in respect of future cash requirements of CGB2 or on future exploration and development work in the Bengara-II PSC.

    2.     

    The Company is entitled to nominate one director to the board of directors of CGB2. At the Report Date the Company’s nominee is sitting on the 3-man board of CGB2 together with 2 directors appointed by CNPCHK-Indonesia.

    3.     

    CGB2 is obliged to reimburse a net amount of $3,780,000 to the Company from CGB2 cost recovery revenues, on a first-in-first-out basis in preference to any CNPCHKI entitlements, arising out of the Bengara-II PSC for accumulated prior sunk costs invested in CGB2 and the Bengara-II PSC property by the Company pursuant to the Bengara-II PSC.

    D.  EXCHANGE CONTROLS.

    Except as discussed in ITEM-10.E, "Taxation", the Company is not aware of any Canadian federal or provincial laws, decrees, or regulations that restrict the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-Canadian holders of the common shares. There are no limitations on the right of non-Canadian owners to hold or vote the common shares imposed by Canadian federal or provincial law or by the charter or other constituent documents of the Company.

    The Investment Canada Act (the “Investment Act”), which generally prohibits a reviewable investment by an entity that is not a “Canadian”, as defined, unless after review, the minister responsible for the Investment Act is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. An investment in the Shares by a non-Canadian who is not a “WTO investor” (which includes governments of, or individuals who are nationals of, member states of the World Trade Organization and corporations and other entities which are controlled by them), at a time when the Company was not already controlled by a WTO investor, would be reviewable under the Investment Act under three circumstances. First, if it was an investment to acquire control (within the meaning of the Investment Act) and the value of the Company’s assets, as determined under Investment Act regulations, was C$5 million or more. Second, the investment would also be reviewable if an order for review was made by the federal cabinet of the Canadian government on the grounds that the investment related to Canada’s cultural heritage or national identity (as prescribed under the Investment Act), regardless of asset value. Third, the investment would also be reviewable if an order for review is made by the federal cabinet of the Canadian government on the grounds that an investment by a non-Canadian could be injurious to national security.

    An investment in the Shares by a WTO investor, or by a non- Canadian at a time when the Company was already controlled by a WTO investor, would be reviewable under the Investment Act if it was an investment to acquire control and the value of the Company’s assets, as determined under Investment Act regulations, was not less than a specified amount, which for 2009 is C$312 million.

    The usual thresholds for review for direct acquisitions of Canadian businesses (other than acquisitions of cultural businesses) by foreign investors will change as of a date to be determined by the federal cabinet of the Canadian Government. At that time transactions will be reviewable only if the “enterprise value” of the assets of the Canadian business is equal to or greater than (a) C$600 million, in the case of investments made during the first two years after the amendments come into force; (b) C$800 million, in the case of investments made during the third and fourth years after the amendments come into force; and (c) C$1 billion, in the case of investments made between the fifth year after the amendments come into force and December 31 of the sixth year after the amendments come into force. This threshold will thereafter be adjusted on an annual basis.

    The Investment Act provides detailed rules to determine if there has been an acquisition of control. For example, a non-Canadian would acquire control of the Company for the purposes of the Investment Act if the non-Canadian acquired a majority of the Shares. The acquisition of less than a majority, but one-t hirdone-third or more, of the Shares would be presumed to be an acquisition of control of the Company unless it could be established that, on the acquisition, the Company not controlled in fact by the acquirer. An acquisition of control for the purposes of the Investment Act could also occur as a result of the acquisition by a non-Canadian of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

    E.TAXATION.

    E. TAXATION.

    Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations- The following summary discusses only the Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to a holder (a "Holder") of one or more common shares of the Company who, for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Tax Act") is a non-resident of Canada who holds common shares as capital property. The summary deals with the provisions of the Tax Act in force on 12/31/99. It99.It does not discuss all the tax consequences that may be relevant to particular holders in light of their circumstances or to holders subject to special rules. It is therefore not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder of common shares of the Company and no opinion or representation with respect to the Canadian income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is made. Holders and prospective holders should therefore consult their own tax advisers with respect to their partic ularparticular circumstances.

    Dividends- A Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax ("Part XIII Tax") equal to 25%, or such lower rate as may be available under an applicable tax treaty, of the gross amount of any dividend paid or deemed to be paid on common shares. Under the Canada-US Income Tax Convention (1980) as amended by the Protocols signed on 6/14/83, 3/28/84, 3/17/95, and 7/29/97 (the "Treaty"), the rate of Part XIII Tax applicable

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 28 of 33





    to a dividend on common shares paid to a Holder who is a resident of the United States and who is the beneficial owner of the dividend, is 5%. If.If the Holder is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company paying the dividend, and, in all other cases, the tax rate is 15% of the gross amount of the dividend. The Company will be required to withhold the applicable amount of Part XIII Tax from each dividend so paid and remit the withheld amount directly to the Receiver General for Canada for the account of the Holder.

    Continental Energy Corp.2010 Annual Report on Form 20FPage 29 of 33




    Disposition of Common Shares- A Holder who disposes of a common share, including by deemed disposition on death, will not normally be subject to Canadian tax on any capital gain (or capital loss) thereby realized unless the common share constituted "taxable Canadian property" as defined by the Tax Act. Generally, a common share of a public corporation will not constitute taxable Canadian property of a Holder if the share is listed on a prescribed stock exchange unless the Holder or persons with whom the Holder did not deal at arm's length alone or together held or held options to acquire, at any time within the five years preceding the disposition, 25% or more of the shares of any class of the capital stock of the Company. The CDNX is a prescribed stock exchange under the Tax Act. A Holder who is a resident of the United States and realizes a capital gain on a disposition of a common share that was taxable Canadian property will nevertheless, by virtue of the T reaty,Treaty, generally be exempt from Canadian tax thereon unless (a) more than 50% of the value of the common shares is derived from, or from an interest in, Canadian real estate, including Canadian mineral resource properties, (b) the common share formed part of the business property of a permanent establishment that the Holder has or had in Canada within the 12 month period preceding the disposition, or (c) the Holder is an individual who (i) was a resident of Canada at any time during the 10 years immediately preceding the disposition, and for a total of 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years, preceding the disposition, and (ii) owned the common share when he ceased to be resident in Canada. A Holder who is subject to Canadian tax in respect of a capital gain realized on a disposition of a common share must include three quarters of the capital gain (taxable capital gain) in computing the Holder's taxable income earned in Canada. The Holder may, subject to certain limitations, deduct three-quarte rsthree-quarters of any capital loss (allowable capital loss) arising on a disposition of taxable Canadian property from taxable capital gains realized in the year of disposition in respect to taxable Canadian property and, to the extent not so deductible, from such taxable capital gains realized in any of the three preceding years or any subsequent year.

    United States Taxation- For federal income tax purposes, an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States or a domestic corporation ("US Taxpayer") will recognize a gain or loss on the sale of the Company's common shares equal to the difference between the proceeds from such sale and the adjusted tax basis of the common shares. The gain or loss will be a capital gain or capital loss if the Company's common shares are capital assets in the hands of the US Taxpayer. For federal income tax purposes, a US Taxpayer will be required to include in gross income dividends received on the Company's common shares. A US Taxpayer who pays Canadian tax on a dividend on common shares will be entitled, subject to certain limitations, to a credit (or alternatively, a deduction) against federal income tax liability.

    A domestic corporation that owns at least 10% of the voting shares of the Company should consult its tax advisor as to applicability of the deemed paid foreign tax credit with respect to dividends paid on the Company's common shares. Under a number of circumstances, United States Investor acquiring shares of the Company may be required to file an information return with the Internal Revenue Service Center where they are required to file their tax returns with a duplicate copy to the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, PA 19255. In particular, any United States Investor who becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the shares of the Company will be required to file such a return. Other filing requirements may apply, and United States Investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning these requirements.

    This is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder of common shares of the Company and no opinion or representation with respect to the US income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is made. Holders and prospective holders should therefore consult their own tax advisers with respect to their particular circumstances.

    F.  DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS.

    F.DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS.

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-10.F is not applicable.

    G.  STATEMENT BY EXPERTS.

    G.STATEMENT BY EXPERTS.

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-10.G is not applicable.

    H.  DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY.

    H.DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY.

    Documents and agreements concerning our Company referred to in this annual reportAnnual Report may be viewed by appointment during normal business hours at our registered and records office at Suite 2600, Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre, 595 Burrard900-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7X 1L3.V6C 3H1, Canada.

    I.  SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION.

    I.SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION.

    As of the Report Date, we have no direct and indirectly owned subsidiaries incorporated in the United States as further described in Item-4.C and as shown in the following table:States.

    SubsidiaryIncorporation / Acquisition DateOwnership Percentage
    CG Xploration Inc.11/18/0550%

    ITEM11.-11 : QUANTITATIVE ANDQUALITATIVEDISCLOSURESABOUTMARKETRISK.

    The provision of information called for by this Item-11 is not applicable.

    Continental Energy Corp.2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20Ffor FYE 2013Page 3029 of 33

     





    ITEM12.-12 : DESCRIPTION OFSECURITIESOTHER THANEQUITYSECURITIES.

    We are filing this Form 20-FForm-20F as an annual report under the Exchange Act and therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-12 is not applicable.

    Continental Energy Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report for FYE 2013Page 30 of 33

    P A R T





    PART - II


    I
    TEM13.-13 : DEFAULTS, DIVIDENDARREARAGES ANDDELINQUENCIES.

    The provision of information called for by this Item-13 is not applicable.

    ITEM14.-14 : MATERIALMODIFICATIONS TO THERIGHTS OFSECURITYHOLDERS ANDUSE OFPROCEEDS.

    The provision of information called for by this Item-14 is not applicable.

    ITEM15.-15 : CONTROLS ANDPROCEDURES.

    A.  DISCLOSURECONTROLS ANDPROCEDURES.

    A.DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

    As required under applicable United States securities regulatory requirements, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our Company's disclosure controls and procedures as at fiscal year endFiscal Year ended 6/30/1013 to prevent a material weakness. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

    Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Finance Manager, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

    The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.Annual Report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of 6/30/10.13.

    B.  MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING.

    B.MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING.

    Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our1934.Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

    Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

    Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of 6/30/1013 based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment, management determined that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of 6/30/10,13, based on those criteria.

    C.  ATTESTATION REPORT OF THE REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

    C.ATTESTATION REPORT OF THE REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

    This report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management'sManagement’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010 that provides small public companies with market capitalizations below $75 million a permanent exemption from the Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) requirement to obtain an audit of internal controls over financial reporting.

    D.  CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING.

    D.CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING.

    There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting procedures or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect these internal controls over financial reporting subsequent to the date of management's last evaluation.

    Continental Energy Corp.2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20Ffor FYE 2013Page 31 of 33

     





    ITEM16.-16 : [RESERVED]

    A.  AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

    A.AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

    Our Board of Directors has determined that we have one member of our Audit Committee that qualifies as an "Audit Committee financial expert" as defined in Item 401(e) of Regulation S-B. We believe that the members of our Board of Directors, who are the same members of our Audit Committee, are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

    Our Board of Directors has determined that Phillip B. Garrison and David Yu qualify as "independent" members of our Audit Committee as that term is defined in Rule 4350(d) of the Marketplace Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). We.We believe that having an Audit Committee that consists entirely of independent Directors is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated revenues to date.

    B.  CODE OFETHICS.

    B.CODE OF ETHICS.

    We have formally adopted a written code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and our principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions (collectively our “Senior Financial Officers”). A copy of this code of ethics, signed by the appropriate Senior Financial Officers of our Company, is filed with this Annual Report as an attachment

    C.  PRINCIPALACCOUNTANTFEES ANDSERVICES.

    C.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

    The Company engaged Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP ("DMCL"DMCL") Chartered Accountants, of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada as the Company's auditors on 10/13/06. DMCL is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia. The firm is also a member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. In addition, DMCL is registered with the Public Company Accountability Oversight Board. Our Board of Directors appointed DMCL as our principal accountant to audit our financial statements for Fiscal 2013, the period covered by this Annual Report, fiscal year-ended 6/30/10.Report.

    Audit Fees-The aggregate fees billed by DMCL for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the year ended 6/30/10 are expected to be approximately $28,000 (200913 were $20,000 (2012 - $27,736.80)$ 20,000).

    Audit Related Fees-The aggregate fees billed by DMCL for professional services rendered and related to the audit of our annual financial statements for the year ended 6/30/1013 including reviews of related annual regulatory filings made in British Columbia and in this Annual Report are expected to be approximately $3,000 (2009$nil (2012 - $3,150)$nil).

    Tax Fees-The aggregate fees billed by DMCL for professional services rendered and related to tax advice, return preparation, and tax planning for the year ended 6/30/1013 were $nil (2009(2012 - $nil).

    Audit Committee Pre-Approved Procedures- Our Audit Committee pre-approves all services provided by DMCL as our principal accountant. DMCL’s fees were reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee before the respective services were rendered and none of such services were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

    D.  EXEMPTIONS FROM THELISTINGSTANDARDS FORAUDITCOMMITTEES.

    D.EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES.

    The provision of information called for by this Item-16.D is not applicable.

    E.  PURCHASES OFEQUITYSECURITIES BY THEISSUER ANDAFFILIATEDPURCHASERS.

    E.PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

    During the most recently completed financial yearFiscal Year ended 6/30/1013 and covered by this Annual Report the Company made no repurchases of its own securities pursuant to any plan or program. The Company made no public announcements of any securities repurchase plans or programs during the year. There are no outstanding securities that may yet be purchased under any plan or program attributable to the past or prior years as at the Report Date.

    F.  CHANGE INREGISTRANTSCERTIFYINGACCOUNTANT.

    F.CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT.

    The provision of information called for by this Item-16.DItem-16.F is not applicable, thereapplicable. There have been no changes to our certifying accountant during the past two most recent fiscal years.Fiscal Years.

    G.  CORPORATEGOVERNANCE.

    G.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

    Our Company’s securities are quoted on the OTCBBOTCQB and are not listed on a national securities exchange. This Annual Report is for our fiscal year-endedFiscal Year ended 6/30/2010.13. Therefore the provision of information called for by this Item-16.G is not applicable.

    Continental Energy Corp.2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20Ffor FYE 2013Page 32 of 33

     





    P A R TPART - III


    I
    TEM17.-17 : FINANCIALSTATEMENTS.

    Refer to "Item 18 – Financial Statements" below.

    ITEM18.-18 : FINANCIALSTATEMENTS.

    The Company is providing its audited annual financial statements for Fiscal 20102013 with this annual reportAnnual Report on Form-20F in the form described in the following list and attached following Item-19 and the Signatures below:

    Consolidated Financial Statements Filed With and as a Part of this Annual Report

    1.(1)     

    Financial Statement Title Page

    2.(2)     

    Reports of our Auditor, DMCL, for the past 3 fiscal yearstwo Fiscal Years ended 6/30/10, 6/30/09,13 and 6/30/08.12.

    3.(3)     

    Comments by our Auditor, DMCL,Consolidated Statements of Financial Position for US Readers on Canada-US Reporting Differences.the past two Fiscal Years ended 6/30/13 and 6/30/12.

    4.(4)     

    Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Comprehensive Loss for the past 2 fiscal yearstwo Fiscal Years ended 6/30/1013 and 6/30/09.12.

    5.(5)     

    Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the past 3 fiscal years ended 6/30/10, 6/30/09, and 6/30/08.

    6.     

    Consolidated Statement of Operations for the past 3 fiscal years ended 6/30/10, 6/30/09, and 6/30/08.

    7.     

    Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows for the past 3 fiscal yearstwo Fiscal Years ended 6/30/10, 6/30/09,13 and 6/30/08.12.

    8.(6)     

    Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the past two Fiscal Years ended 6/30/13 and 6/30/12.

    (7)     

    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the past 3 fiscal yearstwo Fiscal Years ended 6/30/10, 6/30/09,13 and 6/30/08.12.

    (8)     

    Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Management Discussion and Analysis for the first nine months of Fiscal 2014 and period ended 3/31/14.

    ITEM19.-19 : EXHIBITS.

    ExhibitDescription
    01.1(1)Articles of Incorporation as last amended at a special general meeting on 9/10/08.
    01.2(2)Notice of amended Articles of the Company as last recorded with the Registrar of British Columbia on 11/13/09.
    11.1Code of Ethics of Senior Financial Officers Last Revised and Restated on November 26, 2010dated at the Report Date.
    12.1Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO.
    12.2Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO.
    13.1Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO.
    13.2Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO.
    99.1(3)Audit Committee Charter
    99.2(4)Compensation Committee Charter


    Notes:

    (1)Incorporated by reference to a copy furnished to the SEC under Form-6K on 10/10/08.(2)

    (1)Incorporated by reference to a copy furnished to the SEC under Form-6K on 10/10/08.
    (2)Incorporated by reference to a copy furnished to the SEC under Form-6K on 12/14/09.
    (3)Incorporated by reference to a copy attached to the Company’s management information circular filed pursuant to required Canadian proxy materials in advance of the Company’s 12/20/09 annual meeting and furnished to the SEC under Form-6K on 12/14/09.
    (4)Incorporated by reference to a copy furnished to the SEC under Form-6K on 12/14/09.
    SIGNATURES
    Continental Energy Corporation

    (3)Incorporated by reference to a copy attached to the Company’s management information circular filed pursuant to required Canadian proxy materials in advance of the Company’s 12/20/09 annual meeting and furnished to the SEC under Form-6K on 12/14/09.

    (4)Incorporated by reference to a copy furnished to the SEC under Form-6K on 12/14/09.

    SIGNATURES

    CONTINENTALENERGYCORPORATION

    <Signed>

    By: Richard L. McAdoo, Director & CEO
    Report Date: May 13, 2014

    /s/ Richard L. McAdoo
    By: Richard L. McAdoo, Director & CEO
    Report Date: November 26, 2010

    Continental Energy Corp.2010Corporation - Form-20F Annual Report on Form 20Ffor FYE 2013Page 33 of 33

     





    2013 FORM - 20F EXHIBIT - 11.1

    CODEOFETHICSFORSENIORFINANCIALOFFICERS

    Last Revised and Restated on May 13, 2014

    The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller (collectively, the "Senior Financial Officers") of Continental Energy Corporation (the "Company") must adhere to this Code of Ethics for Senior Officers, in addition to all other applicable Company policies. This Code of Ethics shall constitute the Company's code of ethics for senior financial officers, as required by Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") promulgated thereunder.

    1. PRINCIPLESGOVERNINGPROFESSIONALANDETHICALCONDUCT

    It is the policy of the Company that its Senior Financial Officers will adhere to, advocate for, and promote professional and ethical conduct; honesty and integrity, and accountability for adherence to this code.

    2. CONFLICTS OFINTEREST

    The Senior Financial Officers must promote a culture of honesty and integrity throughout the Company and avoid conflicts of interest with the Company. The Senior Financial Officers should avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships. Any situation, transaction or relationship that involves, or may reasonably be expected to involve, a conflict of interest with the Company must be disclosed immediately to the Audit Committee.

    3. FINANCIALREPORTING ANDDISCLOSURE

    Senior Financial Officers shall seek to promote fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the company files with or submits to the SEC. The Company seeks to provide disclosure to the investment community that is not only in conformity with applicable rules of the SEC, but that also fairly presents to the investors the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Senior Financial Officers shall seek to promote ethical behavior by other Company officers and employees involved in financial reporting.

    4. COMPLIANCE WITHAPPLICABLELAWS, RULES ANDREGULATIONS

    It is the policy of the Company to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments and other regulatory agencies that affect the conduct of the Company's business and financial reporting. The Senior Financial Officers are expected to be familiar with the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to their business responsibilities and to fulfill their duties in accordance with these laws, rules and regulations.

    5. WAIVER

    Waivers of this Code of Ethics may only be granted by the Company’s Audit Committee and will be disclosed in accordance with applicable securities laws.

    6. CODECOMPLIANCE ANDVIOLATIONS

    Compliance with this Code of Ethics is mandatory. Each Senior Financial Officer shall promptly report any information he or she may have concerning evidence of any material violation of the securities or other laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Company and the operation of its business, by the Company, or any of its agents, and any violation of this Code of Ethics to the Company’s Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may determine, or designate appropriate persons to determine, appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment, in the event of any such violation.

    The undersigned incumbent Senior Financial Officers have read the foregoing and certify their compliance with this Code of Ethics.

    <Signed><Signed>
    Richard L. McAdooRobert V. Rudman
    CEOCFO





    2013 FORM - 20F EXHIBIT - 12.1

    SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS
    The disclosure required to be filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
    is included below in this Exhibit-12.1 in the form required as Certificates by the Company's CFO.

    CFO CERTIFICATE

    I,Robert V. Rudman, certify that:

    1.     

    I have reviewed and read this annual report on Form-20F of Continental Energy Corporation (the “Company”);

    2.     

    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

    3.     

    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

    4.     

    The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15( e)) for the Company and have:

    (a)     

    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    (c)     

    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (d)     

    disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered y the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

    5.

    The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluations of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a)     

    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b)     

    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

    Dated: May 13, 2014

    <Signed>
    Robert V. Rudman
    CFO





    2013 FORM - 20F        EXHIBIT - 12.2

    SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS
    The disclosure required to be filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
    is included below in this Exhibit-12.2 in the form required as Certificates by the Company's CEO.

    CEO CERTIFICATE

    I,Richard L. McAdoo, certify that:

    1.     

    I have reviewed and read this annual report on Form-20F of Continental Energy Corporation (the “Company”);

    2.     

    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

    3.     

    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

    4.     

    The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

    (a)     

    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    (c)     

    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (d)     

    disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered y the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

    5.

    The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluations of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a)     

    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b)     

    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

    Dated: May 13, 2014

    <Signed>
    Richard L. McAdoo
    CEO





    2013 FORM - 20F        EXHIBIT - 13.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report on Form-20F for fiscal year endedJune 30, 2013of Continental Energy Corporation, a British Columbia, Canada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I,Richard L. McAdoo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.

    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    2.

    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    Dated: May 13, 2014

    <Signed>
    Richard L. McAdoo
    CEO

    2013 FORM - 20F        EXHIBIT - 13.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report on Form-20F for fiscal year endedJune 30, 2013of Continental Energy Corporation, a British Columbia, Canada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I,Robert V. Rudman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.

    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    2.

    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    Dated: May 13, 2014

    <Signed>
    Robert V. Rudman
    CFO

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
    otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
    required by Section 906, has been provided to Continental Energy Corporation and will be retained
    by Continental Energy Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





    CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORPORATION

    (An Exploration Stage Company)

    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    30 June 2010 and 2009JUNE 2013

    Expressed in U.S. Dollars






    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’AUDITOR’S REPORT

    To the Shareholders of Continental Energy Corporation (an Exploration Stage Company):Corporation;

    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsfinancial statements of Continental Energy Corporation, (An Exploration Stage Company) as at June 30, 2010 and 2009,which comprise the consolidated statements of shareholders’ deficiency,financial position as at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in equity deficiency and cash flows for the years then ended, June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008.a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

    TheseManagement's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

    Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are the responsibility of the company's management. free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

    Auditor’s Responsibility

    Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform anthe audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free offrom material misstatement.

    An audit includes examining, on a test basis,involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence supportingabout the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes assessingevaluating the appropriateness of accounting principlespolicies used and significantthe reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements.

    We believe that the audit evidence that we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

    Opinion

    In our opinion, thesethe consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanyContinental Energy Corporation as at June 30, 2010December 31, 2013 and 2009, the results of2012, and its operationsfinancial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

    “DMCL”               Emphasis of Matter

    DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
    Chartered Accountants

    Vancouver, Canada
    October 20, 2010

    COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR U.S. READERS ON CANADA-UNITED STATES REPORTING DIFFERENCES

    InWithout qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1 in the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when theconsolidated financial statements are affected bywhich describes certain conditions and eventsthat indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that cast substantialsignificant doubt on the Company’sabout Continental Energy Corporation’s ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated October 20, 2010 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors’ report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements.concern.

    “DMCL”              

    DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
    Chartered Accountants

    Vancouver, Canada
    October 20, 2010



    DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
    CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
    Vancouver, Canada
    April 22, 2014







    Continental Energy CorporationStatement 1
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Financial Position
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

      30June  30 June 
    ASSETS  2010  2009 
    Current       
    Cash $ 88,843 591,930 
    Receivables  1,881  936 
    Prepaid expenses and deposits  9,465  4,910 
      100,189  597,776 
    Investments(Note 7)  1  1 
    Resource Property Costs(Note 7)  1  1 
    Equipment(Note 8)  18,965  37,931 
     $ 119,156 635,709 
     
     
    LIABILITIES       
    Current       
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(Note 10d) $ 284,787 69,738 
     
    SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)       
    Share Capital- Statement 2 (Note 9)  13,522,030  13,419,653 
    Contributed Surplus- Statement 2 (Note 9)  7,140,572  6,699,165 
    Deficit-Statement 2  (20,828,233)  (19,552,847
      (165,631)  565,971 
     $ 119,156 635,709 
      30 June 30 June 
      2013 2012 
    ASSETS $ $ 
    Current     

    Cash

     21,999 152,971 

    Receivables

     2,333 2,391 

    Prepaid expenses and deposits

     517 13,600 
          
      24,849 168,962 
    Non-current assets     

    Investments

    7862,375 114,769 

    Exploration and evaluation asset

    7- 1 

    Equipment

    89,403 14,412 
          
      896,627 298,144 
          
    LIABILITIES     
    Current     

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    11431,263 149,206 

    Loan payable to related party

    1127,107 27,926 

    Convertible debt

    9311,171 269,645 
      769,541 446,777 
          
    EQUITY DEFICIENCY     
    Share capital1016,100,792 15,142,030 
    Conversion option reserve1010,966 8,966 
    Share based payment reserve109,353,635 9,268,928 
    Deficit (25,286,872)(24,568,557)
          
    Equity deficiency attributable to owners of the parent 178,521 (148,633)
    Deficiency attributable to non-controlling interest7(51,435)- 
      127,086 (148,633)
          
      896,627 298,144 

    Nature of Operations and Going Concern(Note 1)
    Subsequent Events(Note 14)

    ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD:

    "Richard L. McAdoo"McAdoo”

    _________________________________,, Director

    "Robert V. Rudman"Rudman”

    _________________________________,, Director

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    3





    Continental Energy CorporationStatement 2
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ DeficiencyLoss and Comprehensive Loss
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

     Common Shares  Common Share  Contributed      
     Shares  Amount  Subscriptions  Surplus  Deficit  Total 
     
    Balance - 30 June 2007 63,372,381 11,731,566 7,500 3,221,931 (13,307,498) $ 1,653,499 

    Issuance of shares for: 

                   

    Private placements 

    5,265,000  1,628,357  -  1,681,393  - 3,309,750 

    Arrangement fee 

    250,000  162,500  -  -  - 162,500 

    Exercise of options 

     7,500  (7,500 -  - - 

    Treasury shares held 

     (48,000 -  -  - (48,000

    Share issuance costs 

     (162,500 -  -  - (162,500

    Financing fees - warrants 

     -  -  279,256  - 279,256 

    Stock-based compensation 

     -  -  1,167,688  - 1,167,688 

    Loss for the year 

     -  -  -  (3,116,762) (3,116,762
     
    Balance - 30 June 2008 68,887,381  13,319,423  -  6,350,268  (16,424,260) 3,245,431 

    Issuance of shares for: 

                   

    Exercise of options 

    360,000  81,230  -  (27,230 - 54,000 

    Debt settlement 

    500,000  55,000  -  -  - 55,000 

    Treasury shares held 

     (36,000 -  -  - (36,000

    Stock-based compensation 

     -  -  376,127  - 376,127 

    Loss for the year 

     -  -  -  (3,128,587) (3,128,587
     
    Balance - 30 June 2009 69,747,381  13,419,653  -  6,699,165  (19,552,847) 565,971 

    Issuance of shares for: 

                   

    Private placements 

    2,643,000  102,377  -  82,633  - 185,010 

    Financing fees - warrants 

     -  -  79,008  - 79,008 

    Financing fees - options 

     -  -  95,806      

    Stock-based compensation 

     -  -  183,960  - 183,960 

    Loss for the year 

     -  -  -  (1,275,386) (1,275,386
    Balance - 30 June 2010 72,390,381 $ 13,522,030 $ - $ 7,140,572 $ (20,828,233) $ (261,437) 
      For the For the 
      year year 
      ended ended 
      30 June 30 June 
     Note2013 2012 
      $ $ 
    Expenses     

    Consulting fees

    11120,000 118,000 

    Depreciation

    89,565 9,565 

    Financing fees – warrants

    10- 160,994 

    Interest and bank charges

    966,055 65,109 

    Investor relations

     2,181 41,915 

    Management fees, salaries and wages

    11160,342 172,184 

    Office expenses

     31,332 39,644 

    Professional fees

     104,690 86,471 

    Rent, office maintenance and utilities

     36,226 35,966 

    Share-based payment expense

    1052,250 692,182 

    Transfer agent

     20,394 25,612 

    Travel and accommodation

     36,185 53,724 
          
    Loss before the undernoted (639,220)(1,501,366)
          
    Other income (expenses)     

    Interest income

     3 19 

    Foreign exchange gain

     3,472 5,288 

    Gain on dissolution of subsidiary

     - 17,829 

    Equity income from investment in associate

    737,143 - 

    Loss on settlement of debt

    10- (368,000)

    Gain on sale of equipment

    813,257 - 

    Write-off of investments

    7(114,769)- 

    Write-off of exploration and evaluation assets

    7(1)(329)
          
    Loss and Comprehensive Loss for the Year (700,115)(1,846,559)
          
    Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year attributable to:     

    Owners of the parent

     (718,315)(1,846,559)

    Non-controlling interest

     18,200 - 
          
      (700,115)(1,846,559)
          
    Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted (0.01)(0.02)
          
    Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding 101,946,545 81,085,997 

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    4





    Continental Energy CorporationStatement 3
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive LossCash Flows
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

      For the  For the  For the 
      Year Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended 
      30June  30 June  30 June 
      2010  2009  2008 
    Expenses          

    Amortization 

    $ 18,966 40,304 63,983 

    Consulting fees (Note 10b) 

     92,500  9,750  32,200 

    Filing fees 

     15,421  18,312  11,562 

    Financing fees - cash 

     14,800  -  - 

    Financing fees - warrants (Note 9d) 

     79,008  -  279,256 

    Financing fees - options (Note 9c) 

     95,806  -    

    Foreign exchange loss 

     4,677  8,851  1,804 

    Bank charges 

     5,126  7,690  3,935 

    Investor relations 

     39,070  3,724  128,295 

    Management fees, salaries and wages(Note 10a and d) 

     369,890  791,070  772,006 

    Office expenses 

     97,392  135,571  279,548 

    Professional fees 

     161,010  158,663  142,109 

    Rent, office maintenance and utilities 

     51,447  56,636  54,076 

    Shareholder communication and transfer agent 

     1,733  3,033  16,121 

    Stock-based compensation (Note 9c and d

     183,960  376,127  1,167,688 

    Travel and accommodation 

     43,116  106,283  136,080 
    Loss Before the Undernoted  (1,273,922)  (1,716,014 (3,088,663
    Other Income (Expenses)          

    Bad debt recovery(Note 9b and 10e) 

     -  36,000  - 

    Interest income 

     5  12,717  105,274 

    Loss on disposal of equipment 

     -  (8,993 - 

    Loss on dissolution of Continental Biofuels(Note 13) 

     -  (122,029 (17,815

    Loss on equity investment in Continental Biofuels (Note 13

     -  -  (82,184

    Loss on debt settlement 

     -  (6,157 - 

    Write-off of property acquisition costs(Note 7) 

     -  (1,313,123 - 

    Write-off of loans receivable 

     -  -  (614

    Write-off of resource property costs(Note 7) 

     (1,469)  (10,988 (32,760
    Loss and Comprehensive Loss for the Year $ (1,275,386)  (3,128,587 $ (3,116,762
    Loss per Share - Basic and Diluted $ (0.02) (0.05(0.05
    Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding  70,045,277  69,163,217  67,807,203 
     For the For the 
     year year 
     ended ended 
     30 June 30 June 
     2013 2012 
    Cash Resources Provided By (Used In)$ $ 
    Operating Activities    

    Loss for the year

    (700,115)(1,846,559)

    Items not affecting cash

        

    Depreciation

    9,565 9,565 

    Financing fees – warrants

    - 160,994 

    Gain on sale of equipment

    (13,257)- 

    Interest on convertible debt

    60,245 47,380 

    Interest on related party loan

    733 - 

    Equity income from investment in associate

    (37,143)- 

    Loss on settlement of debt

    - 368,000 

    Share-based payment expense

    52,250 692,182 

    Write-off of exploration and evaluation asset

    1 329 

    Write-off of investments

    114,769 - 

    Changes in non-cash working capital

        

    Receivables

    60 (8)

    Prepaid expenses and deposits

    13,083 (7,500)

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    310,345 (52,758)
     (189,464)(628,375)
    Investing Activities    

    Purchase of equipment

    (5,243)(5,405)

    Sale of equipment

    13,943 - 

    Cash on dissolution of subsidiary

    - (4,749)

    Cash acquired through investment

    6,844 - 

    Investment in TGE

    - (114,768)

    Exploration and evaluation expenditures

    - (329)
     15,544 (125,251)
         
    Financing Activities    

    Shares issued - cash

    44,500 750,000 

    Proceeds from (repayment of) related party loan

    (1,552)(80,830)

    Repayment of notes payable

    - (30,000)

    Convertible promissory note

    - 250,000 
     42,948 889,170 
         
    Change in Cash(130,972)135,544 
    Cash Position – Beginning of Year152,971 17,427 
    Cash Position – End of Year21,999 152,971 
         
    Non-cash financing activities:    

    Shares issued - acquisition of investment

    900,000 - 

    Shares issued - settlement of debt

    30,000 870,000 

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    5





    Continental Energy CorporationStatement 4 
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated StatementsStatement of Cash FlowsChanges in Equity Deficiency
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

      For the  For the  For the 
      Year Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended 
      30June  30 June  30 June 
    Cash Resources Provided By (Used In)  2010  2009  2008 
    Operating Activities          

    Loss for the period 

    $ (1,275,386) (3,128,587(3,116,762

    Items not affecting cash 

             

    Amortization 

     18,966  40,304  63,983 

    Financing fees - warrants 

     79,008  -  279,256 

    Financing fees - options 

     95,806  -  - 

    Loss on disposal or write-down of equipment 

     -  8,993  - 

    Loss on dissolution of Continental Biofuels 

     -  122,029  17,815 

    Loss on equity investment in Continental Biofuels 

     -  -  82,184 

    Shares received for debt 

     -  (36,000 - 

    Stock-based compensation 

     183,960  376,127  1,167,688 

    Write-off of property acquisition costs 

     -  1,313,123  - 

    Write-off of resource property costs 

     1,469  10,988  32,760 

    Changes in current assets and liabilities 

             

    Receivables 

     (945)  15,878  26,274 

    Prepaid expenses and deposits 

     (4,555)  121,460  (8,476

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 

     215,049  72,363  (58,074
      (686,628)  (1,083,322 (1,513,352
    Investing Activities          

    Deferred acquisition costs 

     -  (1,313,123 - 

    Investment in Continental Biofuels 

     -  (122,028 (100,000

    Resource property costs 

     (1,469)  (10,988 (32,760

    Purchase of equipment,net of recovery 

     -  (765 (61,761
      (1,469)  (1,446,904 (194,521
    Financing Activities          

    Share capital issued for cash,net 

     185,010  54,000  3,261,750 
      185,010  54,000  3,261,750 
    Change in Cash  (503,087)  (2,476,226 1,553,877 
    Cash position - Beginning of Period  591,930  3,068,156  1,514,279 
    Cash Position - Ending of Period $ 88,843 591,930 3,068,156 
    Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Transactions          

    Issuance of shares for: 

             

    Finder's fee - Financing 

    $ - - 162,500 

    Debt settlement 

    $ - 55,000 - 
    Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:          
    Cash paid for interest Nil Nil Nil 
    Cash paid for income taxes Nil Nil Nil 
      Share Capital            
      Common Shares            
          Share Based Conversion    Non-   
          Payment Option    controlling   
        Amount Reserve Reserve Deficit  Interest Total 
     NoteNumber $ $ $ $  $ $ 
    Balance – 1 June 2011 72,390,381 13,522,030 8,396,983 - (22,721,998) - (802,985)
    Issuance of shares for:            -   

    Private placement

    1015,000,000 750,000 - - -  - 750,000 

    Debt settlement

    1012,150,000 870,000 - - -  - 870,000 
    Convertible debt issuance cost9- - 12,975 - -  - 12,975 
    Financing fees – warrants10- - 160,994 - -  - 160,994 
    Equity component of convertible debt9- - 5,794 8,966 -  - 14,760 
    Share-based payments10- - 692,182 - -  - 692,182 
    Loss for the year - - - - (1,846,559) - (1,846,559)
    Balance – 30 June 2012 99,540,381 15,142,030 9,268,928 8,966 (24,568,557) - (148,633)
    Issuance of shares for:                

    Private placements - cash

    101,775,000 34,272 10,228 - -  - 44,500 

    Private placement – debt settlement

    101,500,000 24,490 5,510 - -  - 30,000 
    Investment in Visionaire Energy AS720,000,000 900,000 - - -  (69,635)830,365 
    Convertible debt amendments9- - 16,719 2,000 -  - 18,719 
    Share-based payments10- - 52,250 - -  - 52,250 
    Loss for the year - - - - (718,315) 18,200 (700,115)
    Balance – 30 June 2013 122,815,381 16,100,792 9,353,635 10,966 (25,286,872) (51,435)127,086 

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    6





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    1.Nature of Operations and Going Concern

    Continental Energy Corporation (the “Company” or “Continental”) is anincorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Company’s registered address and records office is 900-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3H1.

    The consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented in United States dollars (“U.S. dollars”), which is the functional currency of the Company. The Company trades its shares on the OTCQB.

    The Company's core business is oil and gas exploration company engaged in thevia acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties withand related investments. The Company has recently expanded its business into the focus being on properties locatedoil and gas offshore service industry by acquiring an interest in Indonesia held under production sharing contracts (“PSCs”). a private Norwegian holding company that owns minority interests in two oil and gas service and support businesses.

    The Company is an exploration stage company and none of its oil and gashas no properties that are currently generating revenue. The recovery of the Company’s investment in resource properties and attainment of profitable operations is principally dependent upon financing being arranged by the Company to continue operations, explore and develop theits existing resource properties and the discovery, development and sale of oil and gas reserves.acquire new ones. The outcome of these matters cannot presently be determined because they are contingent on future events.

    These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations. Several adverse conditions cast doubt on the validity of this assumption. The Company has incurred operating losses over the past several fiscal years, has no current source of operating cash flow, and no assurances that sufficient funding, including adequate financing, will be available to conduct further exploration and development of its oil and gas projects.

    The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain the financing necessary to acquire, explore and develop future oil and gas projectsproperties as well as funding ongoing administration expenses by issuance of share capital or through joint ventures, and to realizeventures. Ultimately the Company must achieve future profitable production or realize proceeds from the disposition of potential oil and gas interests acquired.properties. Management intends to obtain additional funding by borrowing from directors and officers and issuing common stock in private placements. There can be no assurance that management’s future financing actions will be successful. Factors that could affect the availability of financing include the Company’s performance, the state of international debt and equity markets, investor perceptions and expectations and the global financial and energy markets. Management is not able to assess the likelihood or timing of improvements in the equity markets for raising capital for future acquisitions or expenditures. These uncertainties represent a liquidity risk and may impact the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in the future.

    If the going concern assumption were not appropriate for these financial statements, thenliquidation accounting would apply and adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets, liabilities, the reported income and expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used and such adjustments could be material.

    7





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    2.Basis of Preparation

     
    2.a)Significant Accounting Policies

    a)     

    Basis of Presentation

    These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principlesInternational Financial Reporting Standards (“Canadian GAAP”IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). All amountsThe policies presented in theseNote 3 were consistently applied to all periods presented and are based on IFRS issued and outstanding as of April 22, 2014, the date the Board of Directors approved the financial statements.

    b)Basis of Consolidation

    The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared on an accrual basis and are expressed in United States dollars (“U.S. dollar”). These financial statements conform in all material respects to United States GAAP except as disclosed in Note 14.

    b)     

    Consolidation

    Thesebased on historical costs, modified where applicable. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its two subsidiaries51% owned subsidiary, Visionaire Energy AS (“Visionaire”), which was acquired during the year ended 30 June 2013(Note 7).

    3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

    The significant accounting policies described below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements, unless otherwise stated.

    a)Significant Accounting Estimates and Judgments

    The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and one joint venture company as follows:assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, profit and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

    8





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    comprehensive loss for the year. When the Company determines it necessary to modify the terms of the options, the Black-Scholes option pricing model is utilized at the date of the modification and uses the modified terms in order to calculate the incremental change in value of the original option. The use of option-pricing model and a change in assumptions used within the model could result in a material impact on the Company’s comprehensive loss for the year.

    ii)Warrant valuation

    The Company grants warrants in conjunction with private placements and as compensation for debt financing arrangements. The fair value of each warrant granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s share price. The Company uses historical data to estimate warrant exercises and forfeiture rates within the valuation model. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the warrant is based on the yields of government bonds. Changes in these assumptions, especially the volatility and the expected life determination could have a material impact on the Company’s comprehensive loss for the year. When the Company determines it necessary to modify the terms of a warrants, the Black-Scholes option pricing model is utilized at the date of the modification and uses the modified terms in order to calculate the incremental change in value of the original warrant if the warrants were originally issued as compensation. The use of option-pricing model and a change in assumptions used within the model could result in a material impact on the Company’s comprehensive loss for the year.

    Critical Judgments

    i)Promissory notes payable:

    The Company, from time to time, may grant convertible instruments as part of its financing and capital raising transactions. A compound financial instrument is a debt security with an embedded conversion option or attached warrants and requires the separate recognition of the liability and equity components. The fair value of the liability portion of the compound financial instrument is determined using a market interest rate for an equivalent debt instrument without the conversion feature. This amount is recorded as a liability and the remainder of the proceeds are allocated to the conversion option and attached warrants which are recognized in the conversion option reserves and share based payment reserves respectively. This makes assumptions as to the market value of the debt instrument without the conversion feature (Note 9).

    ii)     

    Recovery of deferred tax assets:Judgment is required in determining whether deferred tax assets are recognized on the statement of financial position. Deferred tax assets require management to assess the likelihood that the Company will generate taxable income in future periods in order to utilize recognized deferred tax assets. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. The Company has not recognized any deferred tax assets on the statement of consolidated financial position as at 30 June 2013.

     
    b)Foreign Currencies

    All intercompany transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.

    c)     

    Equipment

    The Company provides for amortization on its equipment as follows:

    d)     

    Oil and Gas Properties

    The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas operations whereby all costs of exploring for and developing oil and gas reserves are capitalized and accumulated in cost centres established on a country-by-country basis. Such costs include land acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenses, carrying charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling both productive and non-productive wells, interest costs on significant investments in unproved properties and major development projects and overhead charges directly related to acquisition, exploration and development activities, less any government incentives relating thereto.functional

    Upon establishing production, the costs related to each cost centre from which there is production will be depleted and amortized on the unit-of-production method based on the estimated gross proved reserves of each country. Oil and natural gas reserves and production will be converted into equivalent units based upon estimated relative energy content. Costs of acquiring and evaluating significant unproved properties will be initially excluded from depletion calculations. These unevaluated properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether impairment in value has occurred. When proved reserves are assigned or the value of the property is considered to be impaired, the cost of the property or the amount of the impairment will be added to costs subject to depletion.

    The capitalized costs less accumulated amortization in each cost centre from which there is production will be limited to an amount equal to the estimated future net revenue from proved reserves (based on estimated future prices and costs at the balance sheet date) plus the cost (net of impairments) of unproved properties ("ceiling test"). The total capitalized costs less accumulated depletion and amortization and deferred taxes of all cost centres will be further limited to an amount equal to the estimated future net revenue from proved reserves plus the cost (net of impairments) of all unproved properties less estimated future general and administrative expenses, future financing costs and taxes.9





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    currency of the Company’s subsidiary is the Norwegian Krone. The functional currency determinations were conducted through an analysis of the consideration factors identified in IAS 21, the Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates (“IAS 21”).

    Any transactions in currencies other than the functional currency have been translated to the U.S. dollar in accordance with IAS 21. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded at that rates of exchange prevailing on dates of transactions. At the end of each reporting period, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates prevailing at that date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at rates prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined. All gains and losses on translation of these foreign currency transactions are included in the statements of comprehensive loss. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not retranslated.

    The Company’s presentation currency is the US dollar.

     c)Loss per Share

    The costs (including exploratory dry holes) related to cost centres from which there has been no commercial production are not subject to depletion until commercial production commences. The capitalized costs are assessed annually to determine whether it is likely such costs will be recovered in the future. Costs unlikely to be recovered in the future are written off.

    Proceeds from the farm-out of oil and gas properties are applied against capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized, unless such a sale would significantly alter the rate of depletion and amortization.

    e)     

    Asset Retirement Obligations

    The Company recognizes the legal liability for obligations relating to retirement of property, plant, and equipment, and arising from the acquisition, construction, development, or normal operation of those assets. Such asset retirement cost are recognized at fair value, when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be estimated, in the period in which it is incurred, added to the carrying value of the related asset, and amortized on a systematic basis over the related assets useful life. The liability is adjusted for changes in the expected amounts and timing of cash flows required to discharge the liability and accreted to full value over time through periodic charges to operations.

    There are no asset retirement obligations as at 30 June 2010, 2009 or 2008.

    f)     

    Income Taxes

    Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Future taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying enacted or substantively enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities. The effect on future taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date of enactment or substantive enactment. In addition, the method requires the recognition of future tax benefits to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. A valuation allowance is provided to the extent that it is more likely than not that future income tax assets will not be realized.

    g)     

    Stock-Based Compensation

    All stock-based awards made to employees and non-employees are measured and recognized using a fair value based method. For employees, the fair value of the options is measured at the date of the grant. For non-employees, the fair value of the options is measured on the earlier of the date at which the counterparty performance is complete or the date the performance commitment is reached or the date at which the equity instruments are granted if they are fully vested and non-forfeitable. For employees and non-employees, the fair value of options is charged to operations, with the offsetting credit to contributed surplus, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. If and when the stock options are ultimately exercised, the applicable amounts of contributed surplus are transferred to share capital.

    h)     

    Income (Loss) per Share

    Basic earningsloss per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share assumes the conversion, exercise or contingent issuance of securities only when such conversion, exercise or issuance would have a dilutive effect on earnings per share. The dilutive effect of convertible securities is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the “if converted” method. The dilutive effect of outstanding options and warrants and their equivalents is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. In the years when the Company reports a loss, the effect would be anti-dilutive, and therefore, basic and diluted loss per share are the same.




    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars
     d)Share Based Payments

    i)     

    Basis of Segmented Disclosure

    The Company’s only business activity is the exploration and development of oil and gas prospects. During the years ended 30 June 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company had administration activity in North America and exploration and development activity in South East Asia. The segmented information is identified by geographic location of the Company’s exploration and development activities.

    j)     

    Conversion of Foreign Currencies

    The financial statementsgrants stock options to buy common shares of the Company are prepared in U.S. dollars,to directors, officers, employees and service providers. The board of directors grants such options for periods of up to five years, with vesting periods determined at its sole discretion and at prices equal to or greater than the Company’s functional currency, and the Company’s Canadian and East Asian operations are translated into U.S. dollars under the temporal method as follows:

    k)     

    Management’s Estimates and Assumptions

    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant areas where assumptions are used include determining the impairment of resource properties, the useful life of long-lived assets, the fair values of financial instruments, future tax rates used to determine future income taxes and the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the share purchase options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model taking into account the terms and warrants. Where estimates have been usedconditions upon which the share purchase options were granted. At each statement of financial resultsposition reporting date, the amount recognized as determined byan expense is adjusted to reflect the actual events could differ from those estimates.number of share purchase options that are expected to vest.

    l)     

    Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

    The Company reviews the carrying value of its resource properties and equipment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying value of the asset to its fair value. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.




    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars
     

    e)m)     

    Valuation of Warrants

    The Company values warrants issued as part of a private placement unit by allocating the proceeds from the issueissuance of units between common shares and common share purchase warrants on a pro-rata basis based on relative fair values as follows:

    10





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    The fair value attributed to the warrants is recorded in Contributed Surplus.the share based payment reserve.

    n)     
    f)Exploration and Evaluation Assets

    Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the costs of acquiring licenses, costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity, and the fair value (at acquisition date) of exploration and evaluation assets acquired in a business combination. Exploration and evaluation expenditures are capitalized. Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are recognized in profit or loss. Government tax credits received are recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

    Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if (i) sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, or (ii) facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

    Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of oil and gas resources in an area of interest are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested for impairment and then reclassified to the oil and gas property and development assets within property, plant and equipment. Recoverability of the carrying amount of any exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.

    g)Decommissioning Liabilities

    The Company provides for the costs of decommissioning associated with long-lived assets, including the abandonment of oil and natural gas wells, related facilities, compressors, gas plants, removal of equipment from leased acreage and returning such land in a condition as it is contractually obligated. The best estimate of decommissioning liabilities is recorded in the period a well or related asset is drilled and evaluated, constructed or acquired. The decommissioning liabilities is measured in the consolidated statement of financial position at the fair value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. A corresponding amount is capitalized as part of property, plant and equipment. Any further adjustment arising from a reassessment of estimated cost of the decommissioning liabilities also has a corresponding amount capitalized, whilst the charge arising from the accretion of the discount applied to the decommissioning liabilities is treated as a component of finance costs in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

    Management has not identified any legal or expected decommissioning liability as at 30 June 2013.

    h)Equipment

    11





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    Equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is charged so as to write-off the cost of these assets, less residual value, over their estimated useful economic lives, for the following classes of assets:

    i)Financial Instruments

    The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook (“CICA HB”) establishes standards for recognizing and measuring financial assets, financial liabilities and non-financial derivatives. It requires that financialFinancial assets and financialliabilities

    Financial assets and liabilities including derivatives, beare recognized on the balance sheet when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the assets have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.

    Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the statement of financial position when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

    Financial assets are classified into one of the following categories:

    The classification is determined at initial recognition and depends on the nature and purpose of the financial asset.

    (i) FVTPL financial assets

    Financial instruments are classified as FVTPL when the financial instrument is held for trading or it is designated as FVTPL.

    A financial instrument is classified as held for trading if:

    Financial instruments classified as FVTPL are stated at fair value with any resultant gain or loss recognized in profit or loss.

    The Company has no financial assets classified as FVTPL.

    (ii) AFS financial assets

    12





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    Investments held by the Company that are classified as AFS are stated at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognized directly in equity in the investments revaluation reserve. When an investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in the investments revaluation reserve is included in profit or loss for the period.

    The fair value of AFS monetary assets denominated in a foreign currency is translated at the spot rate on the statement of financial position date. The change in fair value attributable to translation differences due to a change in amortized cost of the asset is recognized in profit or loss, while all other changes are recognized in equity.

    The Company has no financial assets classified as AFS.

    (iii) HTM financial assets

    Investments are recognized on a trade-date basis and are initially measured at fair value, including transaction costs. After initial recognition, the Company measures the assets at their fair value. The Company assesses its intention and ability to hold its held-to-maturity investments to maturity not only when those financial assets are initially recognised, but also at the end of each subsequent reporting period. The Company has no HTM financial assets.

    (iv) Loans and receivables

    Trade receivables, loans, and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables.

    Loans and receivables are initially recognized at the transaction value and subsequently carried at amortized cost less impairment losses. The impairment loss of receivables is based on a review of all outstanding amounts at year end. Bad debts are written off during the year in which they are identified. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.

    The Company has classified receivables and cash as loans and receivables.

    (v) Effective interest method

    The effective interest method calculates the amortized cost of a financial asset and allocates interest income over the corresponding period. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash receipts over the expected life of the financial instrument, or, where appropriate, a derivative contract. Allshorter period.

    (vi) Derecognition of financial instruments should beassets

    A financial instrument is derecognized when:

    13





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    Financial liabilities

    Financial liabilities are classified into one of the following categories:

    The classification is determined at initial recognition and depends on the nature and purpose of the financial liability.

    (i) FVTPL financial liabilities

    This category comprises derivatives, or liabilities acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing it in the near term. They are carried on the statement of financial position at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the statements of comprehensive loss.

    (ii) Other financial liabilities

    These are initially measured at fair value, on initial recognition. Measurement in subsequent periods depends on whether the financial instrument has been classified as held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loansnet of transaction costs, and receivables or other liabilities.

    Financial assets and financial liabilities held-for-trading are measured at fair value with gains and losses recognized in the Company’s loss for the period. Financial assets held-to-maturity, loans and receivables and financial liabilities, other than those held-for-trading, aresubsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognized on an effective yield basis. The effective interest method is a method of amortization. Available-for-salecalculating the amortized cost of a financial assets are measured at fair value with unrealized gainsliability and losses including changes in foreign exchange rates being recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) upon adoption.of allocating interest expenses over the corresponding period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments over the expected life of the financial liability, or, where appropriate, a shorter period.

    Derivative instruments must be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value including those derivatives that are embedded in financial instruments or other contracts but are not closely related to the host financial instrument or contract, respectively. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments are recognized in the Company’s loss for the period, except for derivatives that are designated as a cash flow hedge, the fair value change for which is recognized in OCI. The Company has electedclassified accounts payable and accrued liabilities, loan payable to recognize all transaction costs torelated party, and convertible debt as other financial liabilities.

    (iii) Derecognition of financial liabilities

    Financial liabilities are derecognized when the carrying amount (for non-trading instruments)Company’s obligations are discharged, cancelled or they expire.

    j)Impairment

    Financial assets

    At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of a financial asset or financial liability tois impaired. If such evidence exists, the financial instrument on initial recognition.Company recognizes an impairment loss as follows:

    (i)     

    Financial assets carried at amortized cost: The loss is the difference between the amortized cost of the loan or receivable and the present value of the estimated future cash flows, discounted using the instrument’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced by this amount either directly or indirectly through the use of an allowance account.

    (ii)     

    Available-for-sale financial assets: The impairment loss is the difference between the original cost of the asset and its fair value at the measurement date, less any impairment losses previously recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss. This amount represents the

    The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable.14





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    Thecumulative loss in accumulated other comprehensive income that is reclassified to the statement of comprehensive loss.

    Impairment losses on financial assets carried at amortized cost are reversed in subsequent periods if the amount of the loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized. Impairment losses on available-for-sale equity instruments are not reversed.

    Non-financial assets

    At the end of each reporting period, the Company has classified eachreviews the carrying amounts of its significant categorieslong lived assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of financial instruments as follows:the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit (“CGU”) to which the asset belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual CGU’s, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest group of CGU’s for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified.

    Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. If the recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss.

    Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses for assets with a finite useful life, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset or CGU in prior periods. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss.

    Cash k)Held-for-trading 
    Accounts receivable Loans and receivables 
    Accounts payable Other financial liabilities Compound Financial Instruments

    Amendment to Financial Instruments – Disclosures

    CICA HB Section 3862, Financial Instruments – Disclosures was amended to require disclosure aboutCompound financial instruments issued by the inputs used in making fair value measurements, including their classification within a hierarchyCompany comprise convertible promissory notes that prioritizes their significance.can be converted into fixed number of common shares of the Company. The three levelsliability component of the compound financial instrument is recognized initially at the fair value hierarchy are:

    Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
    Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted pricesof a similar liability that are observable fordoes not have any equity conversion option. The equity component is recognized as the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and
    Level 3 – Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

    These amendments are required to be adopted for fiscal years ending after September 20, 2009. The Company has adopted these amendments fordifference between the fiscal year ended 30 June 2010fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole and the additional required disclosuresfair value of the liability component. Any directly attributable transaction costs are included in Note 5.

    o)     

    Comprehensive Income (Loss)

    The CICA HB establishes standards for the reporting and presenting of comprehensive income which is defined as the change in equity from transaction and other events from non-owner sources. OCI refers to items recognized in comprehensive income that are excluded from net loss. At 30 June 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company had no items that caused other comprehensive loss to be different than net loss.



    3.Change in Accounting Policy

    Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Section 3064)

    Effective July 1, 2009 the Company adopted CICA HB Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, which replaces Section 3062, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” and CICA Section 3450, “Research and Development Costs,” and amendments to Accounting Guideline (“AcG”) 11, “Enterprises in the Development Stage,” and EIC-27, “Revenues and Expenditures During the Pre-operating Period” and CICA Section 1000, “Financial Statement Concepts.” The standard intends to reduce the differences with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) in the accounting for intangible assets and results in closer alignment with US GAAP. Under current Canadian standards, more items are recognized as assets than under IFRS or US GAAP. The objectives of CICA Section 3064 are to reinforce the principle-based approachallocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to their initial carrying amounts. Should a compound financial instrument have more than one equity component, transaction costs are allocated to the equity components in proportion to their respective fair values.

    Subsequent to initial recognition, the liability component of assets only in accordance witha compound financial instrument is measured at amortized cost using the definitioneffective interest method. The equity component of an asset and t he criteria for asset recognition; and clarify the application of the concept of matching revenues and expenses such that the current practice of recognizing assets that doa compound financial instrument is not meet the definition and recognition criteria are eliminated. The standard will also provide guidance for the recognition of internally developed intangible assets (including research and development activities), ensuring consistent treatment of all intangible assets, whether separately acquired or internally developed. The Company has evaluated the new section and determined that adoption of these new requirements has had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.re-measured subsequent to initial recognition.


    15





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

     l)Income Taxes

    4.

    New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

    IFRSIncome tax expense consists of current and deferred tax expense. Income tax expense is recognized in the statements of comprehensive loss.

    In 2006, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) published a new strategic plan that will significantly affect financial reporting requirements for Canadian companies. The AcSB strategic plan outlines the convergence of Canadian GAAP with IFRS over an expected five year transitional period. In February 2008 the AcSB announced that 2011Current tax expense is the changeover date for publicly-listed companies to use IFRS, replacing Canadian GAAP. This date is for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginningexpected tax payable on or after 1 January 2011. The Company’s transition date of 1 July 2011 will require the restatement for comparative purposes of amounts reported by the Companytaxable income for the year, ended 30 June 2011. The Company is currently assessingusing tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at period end, adjusted for amendments to tax payable with regards to previous years.

    Deferred taxes are recorded using the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial reporting impactstatement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the transitionenacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to IFRS andapply when the changeover date.

    Business Combinations – Section 1582

    In January 2009,asset is realized or the CICA issued Handbook Section 1582, “Business Combinations” (“CICA 1582”), CICA 1582 requires that allliability settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of an acquired businessa change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that substantive enactment occurs.

    A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be recorded at fair value at acquisition. Obligations for contingent considerations and contingencies will alsoavailable against which the asset can be recorded at fair value atutilized. To the acquisition date. The standard also statesextent that acquisition-related coststhe Company does not consider it probable that a deferred tax asset will be expensed as incurredrecovered, it provides a valuation allowance against the excess.

    The following temporary differences do not result in deferred tax assets or liabilities:

    Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the periods after the acquisition date. The Section applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its financial statements.

    Consolidations and Non-controlling interest – Sections 1601 and 1602

    In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1601, “Consolidations” (“CICA 1601”), and Section 1602, “Non-controlling Interests” (“CICA 1602”). CICA 1601 establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. CICA 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. These standards apply to interim and annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its financial statements.same taxation authority.

    4.Recent Accounting Pronouncements

    Certain new standards, interpretations, amendments and improvements to existing standards were issued by the IASB or IFRIC. The Standards impacted that are applicable to the Company are as follows:

    a)     

    IFRS 7 Financial Instruments – Disclosure (“IFRS 7”) was amended to require additional disclosures on transition from IAS 39 to IFRS 9. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

      
    5.b)     

    IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”) was issued by IASB in October 2010 and will replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (“IAS 39”). IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. There are two measurement categories: amortized cost and fair value. All equity instruments are measured at fair value. A debt instrument is at amortized cost only if the entity is holding it to collect contractual cash flows and the cash flows represent principal


    Fair value

    The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable. Cash is carried at fair value using a level 1 fair value measurement. The carrying value of the receivables and accounts payable approximates their fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

    Management of financial risk

    The Company’s financial instruments are exposed to certain risks, including currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and price risk.16





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    a)     

    Currency risk

    and interest. Otherwise it is at fair value through profit or loss. The standard has no mandatory effective date. The Company is exposed tocurrently evaluating the financial risk related to the fluctuationimpact of foreign exchange rates. The Company operates in Canada and Indonesia and a portion of its expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars and Indonesian Rupiah. A significant change in the currency exchange rates between the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar and the Indonesian Rupiah to the US dollar could have an effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The Company has not hedged its exposure to currency fluctuations. At 30 June 2010, the Company is exposed to currency risk through the following assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, Singapore dollars and Indonesian Rupiah:

     Canadian
    Dollars
    30 June 2010
    Singapore
    Dollars 
    Indonesian
    Rupiah 
    Cash and cash equivalents 30411,80111,911,357
    Receivables 1,881--
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (32,793)-72,236,435

    Based on the above net exposures as at 30 June 2010, and assuming that all other variables remain constant, a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would result in a decrease/increase of $3,061 in the Company’s loss. Likewise, a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the US dollar against the Singapore dollar would result in an increase/decrease of $844 and a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the US dollar against the Indonesian Rupiah would result in a decrease/increase of $926 in the Company’s loss.

    b)     

    Credit risk

    Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations.

    The Company’s cash is held by large Canadian and international financial institutions.

    Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to receivables is remote.this standard.

    c)

    Liquidity riskIFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”), was issued in May 2011 will superseded the consolidation requirements in SIC-12, Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities (“SIC-12”), and IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (“IAS 27”). IFRS 10 builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as a determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements of the parent company. The standard also provides additional guidance to assist in the determination of control where this is difficult to assess. The standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

    Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. Liquidity requirements are managed based on expected cash flows to ensure that there is sufficient capital in order to meet short term obligations. As at 30 June 2010, the Company had a cash balance of $88,843 (30 June 2009 - $591,930) to settle current liabilities of $284,787 (30 June 2009 - $69,738) resulting in a liquidity and solvency risk.

    d)

    Interest rate riskIFRS 11, Joint Arrangements (“IFRS 11”), was issued in May 2011 and superseded IAS 31, Joint Ventures (“IAS 31”). IFRS 11 provides for the accounting of joint arrangements by focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, rather than its legal form (as is currently the case). The Standard also eliminates the option to account for jointly controlled entities using the proportionate consolidation method. The standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

    Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The risk that the Company will realize a loss as a result of a decline in the fair value of cash is limited.

    e)

    Price riskIFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (“IFRS 12”), was issued in May 2011 and is a new and comprehensive standard on disclosure requirements for all forms of interest in other entities, including subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated structured entities. The standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

    The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. The Company closely monitors commodity prices to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken.





    Continental Energy Corporation

    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes

    IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurements (“IFRS 13”) was issued in May 2011 and sets out, in a single IFRS, a framework for measuring fair value. IFRS 13 defines fair value as the price that would be received to Consolidated Financial Statements

    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressedsell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in U.S. Dollarsan orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This definition of fair value emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity specific measurement. In addition, IFRS 13 also requires specific disclosures about fair value measurement. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

     

    6. 

    Capital Management

    f)

    IAS 1, Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) (“IAS 1”), was revised in June 2011 to change the disclosure of items presented in OCI, including a requirement to separate items presented in OCI into two groups based on whether or not they may be recycled to profit or loss in the future. The Company does not have any items that impact OCI and therefore the revisions to IAS 1 did not have any impact on the financial statements of the Company.

    5.Capital Management

    The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the development of its resourceoil and gas properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure which optimizesfor its projects for the costsbenefits of capital at an acceptable risk.its stakeholders. As the Company is in the exploration stage, its principal source of funds is from the issuance of common shares.

    In the management of capital, the Company includes share capitalthe components of shareholders’ equity as well as cash and receivables.

    The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the

    17





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    capital structure, the Company may attempt to issue new shares, enter into joint venture property arrangements, or acquire or dispose of assets. In order to maximize ongoing development efforts,assets, or adjust the Company does not pay out dividends.amount of cash and short-term investments.

    The Company’s investment policy is to invest itsany excess cash in highly liquid short-term interest-bearing investments selected with regardsregard to the expected timing of expenditures from continuing operations.

    The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements and there werewas no significant changes to its approachchange in the Company’s capital management during the year ended 30 June 2010.2013.

    6.Financial Risk Management

    The Company’s financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks. The risk exposures and the impact on the Company’s financial instruments are summarized below.

    a)Currency risk

    The Company is primarily exposed to currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar through expenditures that are denominated in Canadian dollars and other foreign currencies. Also, the Company is exposed to the impact of currency fluctuations on its foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities.

    The Company is exposed to foreign currency risk through the following financial assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars:

    30 June 2013 Cash Receivables Accounts
    payable and
    accrued
    liabilities
     
    Canadian dollars$46$2,333$(136,030)
    Indonesian Rupiah 22 - - 
    Norwegian Kroner 6,844 - (1,711)
      
    30 June 2012 Cash Receivables Accounts
    payable and
    accrued
    liabilities
     
    Canadian dollars$-$2,436$(27,450)
    Indonesian Rupiah 292 - - 

    At 30 June 2013, with other variables unchanged, a +/- 10% change in exchange rates would decrease/increase the loss by $12,850.

    b)Credit risk

    Credit risk is the risk of loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company’s cash is held by reputable financial institutions. Receivables consist of goods and services taxes due from the Federal Government of Canada. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to receivables is remote.

    18





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    c)

    Liquidity risk

    Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. Liquidity requirements are managed based on expected cash flows to maintain sufficient capital to meet short term obligations. As at 30 June 2013, the Company had a cash balance of $21,999 (30 June 2012 - $152,971) which is not sufficient to settle current liabilities of $769,541 (30 June 2012 - $446,777). Management is currently working on obtaining financing to meet these obligations.

    d)

    Interest rate risk

    Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.The Company has a positive cash balance and its debt bears interest at fixed rates. The Company has no significant concentrations of interest rate risk arising from operations.

    e)

    Commodity price risk

    Commodity price risk is the risk of possible future changes in the commodity prices. The Company’s ability to raise capital to fund exploration and evaluation activities is subject to risks associated with fluctuations in the market price of natural gas. The Company closely monitors commodity prices to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

      

    7.7.Resource Property CostsInvestments

    Bengara-II Property

    During the year ended 30 June 2010, the Company incurred $1,469 (2009: $10,988) in geological and geophysical interpretation and evaluation costs on the joint venture area of mutual interest surrounding the Bengara-II PSC in Indonesia. At 30 June 2010 and 2009, no future benefits could be attributed to this property and consequently the capitalized cost were written off.

      30 June    Costs     30June 
      2009  Exploration &  Reimbursed by  Impairment/  2010 
      Balance  Development  Joint Venturers  Abandonment  Balance 
    Bengara-II 1 1,469 (1,469$ 1 

      30 June    Costs     30 June 
      2008  Exploration &  Reimbursed by  Impairment/  2009 
      Balance  Development  Joint Venturers  Abandonment  Balance 
    Bengara-II 1 10,988 (10,9881 

    CGB2Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. (“CGB2”)

    By share purchase and transfer agreements with effective dates of 1 August 1998 and subsequent amendments between 30 September 1998 and 19 January 2000, the Company purchased 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Continental-GeoPetro (Bengara-II) Ltd. (“CGB2”),CGB2, a special purpose company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, which ownedoperates and owns a 100% interest in the Bengara-II PSCproperty, an oil and gas production sharing contract (“PSC”) in Indonesia.

    The Company accounted for the acquisition of CGB2 using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. On 1 January 2000, the Company farmed out 40% of its 100% interest in CGB2 and its respective underlying properties to GeoPetro.GeoPetro Resources Company.




    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    On 29 September 2006, the Company sold 70% of its 60% interest in CGB2 to Kunlun Energy Company Limited (“Kunlun”), formerly known as CNPC (Hong Kong) Limited (“CNPC-HK”) for a gain of $23,906 and an obligation by CNPC-HKKunlun to carry the Company's share of the costs of drilling 4 exploration wells. The Company retained an 18% shareholdinginterest of CGB2, which isCGB2. Kunlun, acting in its capacity as operator of the Bengara-II property, terminated negotiations with the Indonesian government for an extension of the PSC’s term, during the year ended 30 June 2012. Consequently, the PSC was relinquished and allowed to expire in accordance with its terms. The Company’s interest previously recorded at $1 in these financial statements.

    Tungkal Property

    On 1 August 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase a 30% working interest in the Tungkal PSC, located onshore in Sumatra, Indonesia. Under the agreement, the Companyas at 30 June 2012, was to pay total consideration of $27,320,000. The Company paid a cash deposit of $1,500,000 on signature of the definitive sales and purchase agreement. In consideration for negotiating a senior credit facility, the Company made a payment of $100,000 as a financing fee in the prior year. The Company also incurred $197,660 in legal fees and other costs in relation to this transaction in the prior year.

    On 9 April 2009, the agreement was terminated with $500,000 of the original deposit being refunded to the Company and $1,000,000 being forfeited as a break-up fee. As a result of the termination, all acquisition costs relating to the Tungkal property were written off induring the prior year.year ended 30 June 2013.

    South Bengara-II Property19

    On 13 November 2008, the Company acquired an interest in a new PSC in Indonesia. Pursuant to a Joint Bid Agreement (“JBA”) with Adelphi Energy Limited “(Adelphi”) and GeoPetro, ACG (South Bengara-II) Pte. Ltd. (“ACG”), signed a new PSC for the South Bengara-II block. In consideration, the Company made a payment of $100,000 as an interest free loan. The Company also incurred $10,463 in due diligence costs in relation to this transaction in the prior year.

    On 22 May 2009, the agreement was terminated and CESB2 has withdrawn from participation in ACG and its new PSC. CESB2 returned its entire 24.999% stake in ACG to Adelphi and received repayment of $95,000 of the loan previously made.

    All of the Company’s oil and gas interests are unproven.

    8.Equipment

    Details are as follows:

          30June 
          2010 
        Accumulated  Net Book 
      Costs  Amortization  Value 
    Automobiles 35,040 30,767 $ 4,273 
    Computer equipment and software  81,178  69,636  11,542 
    Field survey equipment  27,167  24,017  3,150 
     143,385 124,420 $ 18,965 





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    Tawau Green Energy Sdn. Bhd (“TGE”)

    On 7 May 2012, the Company entered into an option agreement and acquired 300,000 shares of TGE for 6,000,000 Malaysian Ringgit (“MYR”) ($1,965,600). TGE is a privately held company based in Malaysia and is in the business of developing geothermal energy. Under the terms of the agreement, the first MYR 3,000,000 must be paid by the 1stanniversary of the agreement, 7 May 2013. The remaining MYR 3,000,000 of the investment was to be earned through the Company’s expenditures on a mutually agreed upon work program by the first anniversary of the agreement, or if not the Company must return an amount from its 300,000 TGE shares to the seller. By 7 May 2013, the Company had invested a total of $114,769 in TGE. On 20 May 2013, the Company returned all 300,000 of the TGE shares and wrote off its investment in TGE.

    Visionaire Energy AS

    On 4 June 2013, the Company acquired a 51% of the shares of in Visionaire, a privately held Norwegian holding company by issuing 20 million of its common shares with a fair value of $900,000. As the Company has a controlling interest, Visionaire’s accounts were consolidated and a non-controlling interest was recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position. The principal assets of Visionaire are its shareholdings in two separate, privately owned, offshore oil and gas service providers, both based in Bergen, Norway. Visionaire owns a 49% equity interest in VTT Maritime AS and a 41% equity interest in RADA Engineering and Consulting AS. Visionaire maintains significant influence over both investments and both are accounted for using the equity method.

    The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:

      June 4, 2013 
    Fair value of the shares issued$900,000 
    Cash acquired (6,844)
    Payable to related party assumed 1,711 
     Non-controlling interest (69,635)
    Value of investment on acquisition 825,232 

    The movement in the investment is as follows:

      June 30, 2013 
    Valued of investment on acquisition$825,232
     Equity income from associated 37,143 
      862,375 

    20





          30 June
          2009 
        Accumulated  Net Book 
      Costs  Amortization  Value 
    Automobiles 35,040 26,493 8,547 
    Computer equipment and software  81,178  58,095  23,083 
    Field survey equipment  27,167  20,866  6,301 
     143,385 105,454 37,931 

    9.Continental Energy Corporation
    Share Capital(An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    a)     
    8.

    Authorized Share Capital

    Equipment

       ComputerFurniture and  
       equipmentfield  
     Automobiles and softwareequipmentTotal 
     $ $$$ 
     
    Cost      
    Balance, 30 June 201138,774 88,32529,921157,020 
     

    Additions for the year

    - 2,8212,5845,405 
    Balance, 30 June 201238,774 91,14632,505162,425 

    Additions

    - 5,243-5,243 

    Disposals

    (2,955)--(2,955)
    Balance, 30 June 201335,819 96,38932,505164,713 
     
    Accumulated Depreciation      
    Balance, 30 June 201134,148 77,79026,510138,448 

    Depreciation

    2,313 5,4391,8139,565 
    Balance, June 201236,461 83,22928,323148,013 

    Depreciation on disposed assets

    (2,268)--(2,268)

    Depreciation

    1,070 6,4042,0919,565 
    Balance, 30 June 201335,263 89,63330,414155,310 
     
    Net book value      
    Balance, 30 June 20122,313 7,9174,18214,412 
    Balance, 30 June 2013556 6,7562,0919,403 

    During the year ended 30 June 2010,2013, the Company increasedsold assets with a net book value of $687 (30 June 2012 - $nil) for total proceeds of $13,943 resulting in a gain on sale of equipment of $13,257 (30 June 2012 - $nil).

    9.Convertible Debt

    Total
    $
    Balance, 30 June 2011-

    Principal

    250,000

    Transaction cost

    (12,975)

    Equity component – convertible option

    (8,966)

    Equity component – additional consideration warrants

    (5,794)

    Interest

    47,380
    Balance, 30 June 2012269,645

    Interest

    60,245

    Conversion option - amendments

    (2,000)

    Additional consideration warrants - amendment

    (16,719)
    Balance, 30 June 2013311,171

    21





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    On 21 September 2011, the numberCompany issued a convertible promissory note for proceeds of authorized preferred$250,000. The promissory note originally accumulated interest at a rate of 10% per annum or at 15% per annum on default of payment, with maturity date of 22 September 2012. The promissory note principal is convertible, at the election of the holder, at any time during its term into 3,125,000 common shares having no parof the Company. Any unpaid interest upon conversion is also convertible, at the option of the promissory note holder, at the same conversion rate as the promissory note. As additional consideration, the Company issued 1,562,500 warrants (“the additional consideration warrants”)(Note 10)to the note holder, exercisable at $0.12 per share up to 22 September 2013.

    On 21 November 2012, the Company reached an agreement with the note holder, increasing the interest rate retroactively to 18%, extending the maturity of the note and the conversion option to 21 March 2013 and reducing the conversion price from $0.08 to $0.05 per share. The promissory note principal is now convertible, at the election of the holder, at any time during its term into 5,000,000 common shares of the Company. The conversion option amendment resulted in an incremental fair value butof $1,000.

    On 21 May 2013, the Company reached an agreement with special rightsthe note holder, extending the maturity date of the promissory note and restrictions attached from 100,000,000conversion option to 500,000,000.21 September 2013, extending the term of the additional consideration warrants to 21 March 2015 and reducing the exercise price of the additional consideration warrants to $0.08. The conversion feature amendment resulted in an incremental fair value of $1,000. The additional consideration warrant amendment resulted in an incremental fair value of $16,719.

    Subsequent to year end, the Company reached an agreement with the note holder, extending the maturity of the promissory note and conversion option to 30 April 2014(Note14).

    The Company’s authorizedincremental fair value of the conversion feature and the additional consideration warrants were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

       Additional 
     Conversion Consideration 
     Option Warrants 
    Expected dividend yieldNil Nil 
     Expected stock price volatility86%86%
    Risk-free interest rate0.11%0.21%
    Expected life of options (years)0.34 – 1.83 1.83 

    On 21 September 2011, the fair value of the liability and the equity component were calculated on issuance of the promissory note. The fair value of the liability component was calculated using an estimated market related interest rate of 18% and was determined to be $234,432. The residual amount of $14,760, net of transaction costs of $808, represents the value of the equity components included in shareholder’s equity as reserves. The transaction costs were allocated to the liability and equity components based on the value attributed to each component. The fair value of the 1,562,500 warrants granted as additional consideration and the fair value of the conversion option were calculated using Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

    22





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

       Additional 
     Conversion Consideration 
     Option Warrants 
    Expected dividend yieldNil Nil 
     Expected stock price volatility213.52%234.52%
    Risk-free interest rate0.11%0.21%
    Expected life of options (years)1.00 2.00 

    Also in conjunction with the convertible promissory note, the Company issued 250,000 finders’ warrants to an arms-length third party on 21 September 2011, exercisable at a price of $0.12 per share capital consistsup to 21 September 2013. A fair value of 1,000,000,000 shares divided into $12,975 was recorded to the liability during the year ended 30 June 2012, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

    Finder’s
    Warrants
    Expected dividend yieldNil
    Expected stock price volatility234.52%
    Risk-free interest rate0.21%
    Expected life of options (years)2.00

    10.Share Capital

    Authorized Share Capital

    500,000,000 common shares without par value and
    500,000,000 preferred shares without par value. As atvalue

    Shares issued

    Year end 30 June 2010, there are no preferred shares issued or outstanding.

    b)     

    Share Capital

    20102013

    On 26 February 2010,7 January 2013, the Company completed a private placement was completed for 2,643,000of 2,975,000 units for totalwith a purchase price of $0.02 per unit. 1,500,000 of the units, valued at $30,000, were issued to officers of the Company to extinguish debt of $30,000. The remaining proceeds of $185,010.$29,500 were received in cash. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant with each warrant havinghas a term of two years and an exercise price of $0.10$0.05 per common share for a three year term expiring on 8 March 2013.share. The Company allocated $102,377$48,572 to the common shares and $82,633$10,928 to the share purchase warrants based on themanagement’s estimate of relative fair values.

    2009On 4 June 2013, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of its common stock(Note 7)with a fair value of $900,000, in exchange for a 51% interest of the authorized and outstanding shares of Visionaire.

    DuringOn 28 June 2013, a private placement was completed for 300,000 units for total proceeds of $15,000. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half share purchase warrant. Each warrant has a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The Company allocated $10,190 to common shares and $4,810 to the share purchase warrants based on management’s estimate of relative fair values.

    23





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    Year end 30 June 2012

    On 2 March 2012, 11,500,000 shares were issued to settle $460,000 in debt owing to directors, officers and consultants of the Company. The fair value of the shares was $805,000, resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $345,000 during the year ended 30 June 2009, 360,000 stock options2012.

    On 5 March 2012, a private placement was completed for 15,000,000 shares for total proceeds of $750,000.

    On 16 March 2012, 650,000 shares were exercised for net proceedsissued to settle $42,000 in debt owing to an employee and a consultant of the CompanyCompany. The fair value of $54,000.

    Duringthe shares was $65,000, resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $23,000 during the year ended 30 June 2009, 500,000 shares were issued to settle $55,000 in debt owing to a former officer and director (Note 10d).2012.

    During the year ended 30 June 2009, the Company received 400,000 Continental shares in full settlement of a receivable owing from a company controlled by the estate for a deceased director. The fair value of these shares on the date of settlement was $36,000 and therefore, this amount has been recorded as a bad debt recovery. These shares will be held in treasury until resold.Stock options

    c)     

    Stock Options

    The Company has established a share purchase option plan whereby the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may, from time to time, grant options to directors, officers, employees or consultants. Options granted must be exercised within a period as determined by the Company's board of directors. Options vest on the grant date unless otherwise determined by the Company's board of directors. The aggregate number of common shares which may be reserved as outstanding Stock Options shall not exceed 20% of the total number of the Company's issued and outstanding common shares at any time,25,000,000, and the maximum number of options held by any one individual at any one time shall not exceed 5%7.5% of the total number of the Company's issued and outstanding common shares.

    a)Movements in outstanding share options during the period:

       Weighted Average
     Number of Exercise Price
     Options per Share
       $ 
    Outstanding – 30 June 20119,000,000 0.07
     Granted8,000,000 0.05
    Expired(660,000)0.07 
    Outstanding - 30 June 201216,340,000 0.06
    Granted7,800,000 0.05
    Expired(8,340,000)0.07 
    Outstanding and exercisable - 30 June 201315,800,000 0.05 

    b)Fair value of options

    On 4 January 2013, a total of 7,800,000 stock options were granted to directors, officers and consultants of the Company, with an exercise price of $0.05 and a term expiring on 31 December 2015. The fair value of these stock options is $52,250, which was charged to the statement of comprehensive loss as share based payments expense during the year ended 30 June 2013.

    On 2 March 2012, a total of 8,000,000 stock options were granted to directors and senior officers with an exercise price of $0.05 and a term expiring on 31 March 2015. The fair value of these

    24





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    The fair valuestock options is $466,028, which was charged to the statement of each option grant is estimated oncomprehensive loss as share-based payments expense for the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the assumptions disclosed in Note 9(e).

    2010year ended 30 June 2012.

    On 11 January 2010,21 September 2011, a total of 360,000650,000 outstanding incentive stock options were granted to officers of the Company havingwith an exercise price of $0.07 per share and expiring on 31 December 2011. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $8,614 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.03.

    On 11 January 2010, a total of 4,840,000 outstanding incentive stock options to directors and senior officers having various exercise prices between $0.15 and $0.24 and terms expiring between 31 December 20102011 and 201130 June 2012 were amended to all have a new exercise price of $0.07 and an expiry date of 31 December 2011.

    On 11 January 2010, a total of 3,250,000 outstanding incentive stock options to employees and consultants having various exercise prices between $0.20 and $0.24 were amended to all have a new exercise price of $0.07 but no change to their original expiry dates between 31 December 2010 and 30 June 2011.

    On 11 January 2010, a total of 800,000 outstanding incentive stock options to employees having various exercise prices between $0.15 and $0.24 and terms expiring 31 December 2010 were amended to all have a new exercise price of $0.07 and a new expiry date of 31 December 2011.

    On 11 January 2010, a total of 1,500,000 outstanding incentive stock options to employees and consultants having an exercise price of $0.15 and terms expiring 31 December 2011 were amended to all have a new exercise price of $0.07 and a new expiry date of 31 December 2010.

    2012. The Company calculated the incremental increase in the fair value of these amended stock options to be $95,806$12,435 which was charged to operations.the share-based payment expense during the year ended 30 June 2012.

    On 16 September 2009, a total of 1,000,000 stock options were granted to an officer of the Company having an exercise price of $0.15 per share and expiring on 16 September 2012. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $75,219 ongranted and amended were estimated using the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.08.

    2009

    On 29 December 2008, a total of 4,000,000 stock options were granted to advisors, directors, and employees having an exercise price of $0.15 per share and expiring on 31 December 2011. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $302,578 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.08.

    On 2 December 2008, 1,000,000 stock options having an exercise price of $0.24 per share were cancelled as per an agreementBlack-Scholes option pricing model, with the former holder.following weighted average assumptions:

     For the For the 
     year year 
     ended ended 
     30June30 June
     2013 2012 
    Expected dividend yieldNil Nil 
     Expected stock price volatility86%218-244%
    Risk-free interest rate0.27%0.11-0.41% 
    Expected life of options (years)2.99 1.28-3.08 

    c)Share options outstanding

    A summary of the Company’s options outstanding as at 30 June 2013 is as follows:

    OptionsOptionsExercise 
    OutstandingExercisablePriceExpiry date
    8,000,0008,000,000$0.0531 March 2015
     7,800,0007,800,000$0.0531 December 2015
    15,800,00015,800,000  

    The options outstanding at 30 June 2013 had a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.12 years.

    On 29 December 2008, a total of 1,900,000 stock options having an exercise price of $0.65 per share were cancelled as per written agreements with the former holders.

    On 30 September 2008, a total of 100,000 stock options were granted to a consultant having an exercise price of $0.21 per share and expiring on 30 September 2011. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $12,054 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.12.25





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    Warrants

     a)Movements in warrants during the year:

       Weighted
     Number of Average
     Warrants Exercise Price
       per Share
       $ 
    Outstanding – 30 June 201117,968,000 0.15
     

    Issued

    4,162,500 0.12

    Expired

    (1,000,000)0.07

    Cancelled

    (350,000)0.09 
    Outstanding – 30 June 201220,780,500 0.15

    Issued

    3,125,000 0.05

    Expired

    (12,350,000)0.19 
    Warrants outstanding – 30 June 201311,555,500 0.06 

    b)Fair value of warrants

    On 17 July 2008,28 June 2013, a total of 500,000 stock options150,000 warrants were granted to two advisors having an exercise price of $0.21 per share and expiring on 30 June 2011. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $61,495 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.12.

    2008

    On 25 May 2008, a total of 1,750,000 stock options were granted to directors, an employee and consultants of the Company having an exercise price of $0.21 per share and expiring on 25 May 2011. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $227,479 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.13.

    On 17 March 2008, a total of 400,000 stock options were granted to two consultants having an exercise price of $0.20 per share and expiring on 17 March 2011. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $48,763 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.12.

    On 22 December 2007, a total of 4,000,000 stock options were granted to directors, an employee and consultants of the Company having an exercisable price of $0.24 per share and expiring on 31 December 2010 and 700,000 stock options to employees and consultants of the Company having an exercisable price of $0.24 per share and expiring on 30 June 2009. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $691,318 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.15.

    On 17 September 2007, a total of 500,000 stock options were granted to a director having an exercise price of $0.65 per share and expiring on 30 June 2010. The Company calculated the fair value of these options to be $200,128 on the grant date which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair value of these stock options was $0.40.

    Total outstanding and exercisable

    Details of outstanding share purchase options are as follows:

        Weighted Average 
     Number of  Exercise Price 
     Options  per Share  
     
    Options outstanding, 30 June 2008 11,250,000 0.29 

    Options granted 

    4,600,000  0.16 

    Options exercised 

    (360,000 0.15 

    Options cancelled and expired 

    (6,100,000 0.35  
     
    Options outstanding, 30 June 2009 9,390,000  0.20 

    Options granted 

    1,360,000  0.13  
     
    Options outstanding, 30 June 2010 10,750,000 0.07  




    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    As at 30 June 2010, the following share purchase options were outstanding:

     Number of Price per  
    Options shares Share Expiry date 
     2,100,000 $0.07 31 December 2010 
     400,000 $0.07 17 March 2011 
     1,750,000 $0.07 25 May 2011 
     500,000 $0.07 30 June 2011 
     6,000,000 $0.07 31 December 2011 
     
    Total outstanding and exercisable 10,750,000   

    d)     

    Warrants

    2010

    On 26 February 2010, 2,643,000 warrants were issued in conjunction with athe Company’s private placement. Each warrant hasplacement, with an exercise price of $0.10 and an expirya term expiring in three years from date of 26 February 2013.grant.

    On 117 January 2010,2013, a total of 4,975,000 outstanding2,975,000 share purchase warrants originally issuedwere granted in conjunction with the Company’s private placements and having various exercise prices between $0.15 and $0.40 and terms expiring between 15 May 2010 and 16 September 2012 were all amended to have a newplacement, with an exercise price of $0.07$0.05 and a new expiryterm expiring in two years from the date of 31 December 2011. The Company calculated the incremental increase in the fair value of these amended warrants to be $79,008 which was charged to operations.grant.

    On 16 September 2009,27 March 2012, a total of 1,000,000 share purchase warrants were granted to a financial and management advisory company havingconsultant of the Company with an exercise price of $0.15 per share and a term expiring on 1612 September 2012. The Company calculated the fair value of these share purchase warrants to be $75,219 on the grant dateis $98,884 which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair valuethe statement of these warrants was $0.08.comprehensive loss as share-based payments expense for the year ended 30 June 2012.

    On 16 September 2009,21 March 2012, a total of 350,000 share purchase warrants were granted to an investor relations company havingconsultant with an exercise price of $0.09 per share$0.15 and a term expiring on 16 September 2010. These warrants shall vest in four equal tranches of 87,500 shares and each tranche may be exercised only after 1 January 2010; 1 April 2010; 1 July 2010; and 1 October 2010 unless the contract under which they are issued is cancelled by the Company prior to the vest date.2012. The Company has an unconditional right to terminate the agreement after six months in which case any vested warrants will remain unaffected and all unvested warrants will be cancelled. The Company calculated the fair value of these share purchase warrants to be $31,211 on the grant date. In the current period, $24,908 of thisis $29,722 which was charged to operations. The average grant date fair valuethe statement of these warrants was $0.08.

    On 23 July 2009, 15,000 warrants having an exercise price of $1.00 per share expired without being exercised.

    2009

    There were no share purchase warrants issued, exercised or cancelled duringcomprehensive loss as share-based payments expense for the year ended 30 June 2009.2012.

    On 16 March 2012, a total of 1,000,000 share purchase warrants were granted to a consultant of the Company with an exercise price of $0.07 and a term expiring 30 June 2013. The fair value of these share purchase warrants is $85,113, which was charged to the statement of comprehensive loss as share-based payments expense for the year ended 30 June 2012.

    On 21 September 2011, the Company issued 1,562,500 warrants to the holder of a convertible promissory note as additional consideration. The warrants are exercisable at $0.12 up to 22 September 2013. In addition, the Company also issued 250,000 finders’ warrants to an arms’ length third party, exercisable at a price of $0.12 per share up to 21 September 13(Note 7).

    26





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    The fair value of share purchase warrants granted was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions:

    For the
    year
    ended
    30 June
    2012
    Expected dividend yieldNil 
     Expected stock price volatility239%
    Risk-free interest rate0.20%
    Expected life of options (years)1.4

    2008

    DuringOn 17 May 2013, the 2008 fiscal year, a totalterms of 3,725,0003,975,000 and 250,000 outstanding share purchase warrants’warrants having an exercise price of $0.07 and $0.12 and an expiry datesdate of 31 December 2013 and 21 September 2013 respectively were amended from 30 June 2008modified to 30 June 2010. No changehave an exercise price of $0.05 and $0.08 and an expiry date of 31 December 2015 and 15 March 2015 respectively. As these warrants were originally issued to investors in a private placement, no amount of was made to the exercise prices. The Company estimatedrecognized for the incremental increase in their fair value.

    On 26 February 2013, the terms of 2,643,000 outstanding share purchase warrants having an exercise price of $0.10 and an expiry date of 26 February 2013 were modified to have an exercise price of $0.05 and an expiry date of 26 February 2014. As these warrants were originally issued to investors in a private placement, no amount of was recognized for the incremental increase in their fair value.

    On 21 September 2011, the terms of 3,975,000 outstanding share purchase warrants having an exercise price of $0.07 and an expiry date of 31 December 2011 were modified to have an exercise price of $0.07 and an expiry date of 31 December 2013. The incremental increase in fair value of these amended share purchase warrants to be $279,256was $160,994, which was charged to operations.

    Total outstandingthe statement of loss and exercisable

    Details of outstanding share purchasecomprehensive loss as financing fees – warrants are as follows:

      Weighted Average 
     Number ofExercise Price 
     Warrantsper Share 
      
    Warrants outstanding, 30 June 2008 and 30 June 2009 13,990,000$ 0.72 
    Warrants issued 3,993,0000.09 
    Warrants expired (15,000)1.00 
     
    Warrants outstanding, 30 June 2010 17,968,000 $ 0.54 

    Details of outstanding share purchase warrants as atduring the year ended 30 June 2010 are as follows:2012.

     Number of Price per  
    Warrants Shares Share Expiry Date 
     10,000,000 $ 0.90 29 August 2010 
     4,975,000 $ 0.07 31 December 2011 
     350,000 $ 0.09 16 September 2012 
     2,643,000 $ 0.10 26 February 2013 
     
     17,968,000   

    e)     

    Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model Assumptions

    The fair value of each option grant (Note 9c) iswarrants amended was estimated on the date of grantthe amendment using the Black-Scholes option-pricingoption pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions:

     30 June30 June30 June
     201020092008
    Expected dividend yield 0.00%0.00%0.00%
    Expected stock price volatility 108%91% - 98%91% - 107%
    Risk-free interest rate 0.37%1.32% - 3.16%2.68% - 4.28%
    Expected life of options (years) 1.002.96 - 3.001.52 – 3.00
    For the
    year
    ended
    30June
    2012
    Expected dividend yieldNil
    Expected stock price volatility233%
    Risk-free interest rate0.21%
    Expected life of options (years)2.3

    27





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    The fair value of each warrant issued (Note 9d) is estimated on the grant date and date of amendment using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

     30 June30 June 30 June
     20102009 2008
    Expected dividend yield 0.00%n/a 0.00%
    Expected stock price volatility 107%n/a 85% - 103%
    Risk-free interest rate 0.35%n/a 2.76% - 4.66%
    Expected life of warrants (years) 3.00n/a 2.00 – 3.00

    10.Related Party Transactions

    The Company incurred the following transactions with related parties::

    a) c)During the year ending 30 June 2010, management, director and officer fees in the amount of $210,000 (2009 - $367,000, 2008 - $422,500) were incurred to directors and officers of the Company. In addition, the Company paid bonuses totalling $nil (2009 - $nil, 2008 - $60,000) to two directors during the year. Warrants outstanding

    A summary of the Company’s warrants outstanding as at 30 June 2013 is as follows:

    Number ofPrice per 
    SharesShareExpiry Date
    2,643,000$0.0526 February 2014
     2,975,000$0.057 January 2015
    1,812,500$0.0815 March 2015
    3,975,000$0.0531 December 2015
    150,000$0.1028 June 2016
     
    11,555,500  

    The warrants outstanding have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.71 years.

    11.Related Party Transactions

    b) a)During the year ending 30 June 2010 consulting fees in the amount of $92,500 (2009 - $nil, 2008 - $nil) were incurred to an officer of the Company. 
    c) As at 30 June 2010, $152,500 (30 June 2009 - $27,500) is payable to officers of the Company which is included in accounts payableTransactions with related parties and accrued liabilities. 
    d) In March 2009, the contract of a former director and officer was bought out for $103,500, of which $48,500 was paid in cash and the remainder was settled by the issuance of 500,000 shares valued at $55,000(Note 9b)
    e) During the year ended 30 June 2009, the Company received 400,000 shares with a fair value of $36,000 from a former director as settlement for amounts due to the Company. These amounts due were fully provided for in prior years(Note 9b)related party balances

    As at 30 June 2013, $260,925 (2012 - $87,775) was payable to officers of the Company. This amount is included in accounts payable and is unsecured, non-interest bearing and has no specific terms for repayment.

    As at 30 June 2013, there was a loan payable of $27,107 (2012 - $27,926) was payable to an officer of the Company. The above transactions, occurringnote accrued interest at a rate of 10% per annum, is unsecured and is due on 21 September 2013. During the year ended 30 June 2013, interest expense in the normal course of operations, are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established$733 (2012 - $2,218) was accrued. The Company’s total repayment amounted to $19,899 during the year ended 30 June 2013, of which $13,123 was applied against the principal balance and agreed$6,776 was applied to byinterest. The related party advanced a further $18,347 to the related parties.Company under the same terms as the original promissory note.


    During January 2013, the Company completed a private placement of 2,975,000 units(Note 10). A total of 1,500,000 units were issued to the officers of the Company to extinguish debt of $30,000.

    b)Compensation of key management personnel

      For the For the 
      year year 
      ended ended 
      30June30 June
     Note2013 2012 
      $ $ 
    Financing fees(i)- 113,000 
     Management and consulting fees 270,000 247,500 
    Share-based payments expense(ii) (iii)26,796 466,028 
      296,796 826,528 

    28





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 20092013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    11.

    Income Taxes

    a)     

    Income tax expense differs from the amount that would result from applying the federal and provincial statutory income tax rate to earnings before income taxes. These differences result from the following items:

      2010  2009  2008 
     
    Loss before income taxes 1,275,386 3,128,587 3,116,762 
    Tax rate  29.25%  30.25%  32.82% 
     
    Expected income tax recovery  (373,050 (946,398 (1,022,921
    Increase due to:          

    Non-deductible expenses 

     99,734  467,092  494,886 

    Losses and temporary differences for which 

             

    no tax benefit has been recorded 

     283,466  449,965  528,035 

    Other 

     (10,150 29,341  - 
     
    Total income taxes (recovery) - - - 

    b)     

    The components of the Company’s future income taxes are as follows:

      2010  2009  2008 
     
    Future income tax assets          

    Non-capital losses 

    1,659,355 1,405,779 1,218,948 

    Capital losses 

     224,509  194,486  219,375 

    Share issue costs 

     489,857  29,576  105,426 

    Capital assets 

     170,774  176,118  220,694 

    Resource properties 

     32,261  445,085  594,406 
      2,576,756  2,251,044  2,358,849 
     

    Valuation allowance 

     (2,576,756 (2,251,044 (2,358,849
     
    Net future income tax assets - - - 

    The Company has non-capital loss carry-forwards of approximately $5,514,000 that may be available for tax purposes. The loss carry-forwards are principally in respect of Canadian and US operations and expire as follows:

      Canada  US  Singapore  
     
    2014 423,000 
    2015  336,000   
    2026   43,000  
    2027  1,398,000  147,000  
    2028  1,260,000  265,000  
    2029  1,345,000  171,000  
    2030  742,000  60,000  
    No expiry    294,000  
     
     5,504,000 686,000 294,000  




    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    A full valuation allowance has been recorded against the net potential future income tax assets associated with all the loss carry-forwards and certain other deductible temporary differences as their utilization is not considered more likely than not at this time.



    12.Segmented Information

      North America  East Asia  Consolidated 
     
    30 June 2010          

    Segmented revenue 

    - - - 

    Segmented income (loss) 

    (1,052,964(222,422(1,275,386

    Identifiable assets 

    80,989 38,167 119,156 
     
    30 June 2009          

    Segmented income (loss) 

    (2,527,325(601,262(3,128,587

    Identifiable assets 

    467,623 168,086 635,709 
     
    30 June 2008          

    Segmented revenue 

    - - - 

    Segmented income (loss) 

    (2,835,673(281,089(3,116,762

    Identifiable assets 

    3,154,615 143,191 3,297,806 

    13.Investment in Continental Biofuels Corporation

    On 17 October 2007, the Company entered into an agreement pertaining to the acquisition of an interest in a company incorporated in Delaware named Continental Biofuels Corporation (“Continental Biofuels”) in order to pursue biodiesel projects in Indonesia. The Company purchased 1,000 share of the 2,500 issued and fully paid share capital of Continental Biofuels for $100,000 representing a 40% stake. The remaining 60% stake in Continental Biofuels was held by two directors of the Company, each of whom purchased a 30% stake. On 11 August 2008, Continental Biofuels signed a Certificate of Dissolution thereby eliminating the Company’s 40% interest. Therefore, the Company’s interest in Continental Biofuels has been written off. During the year ended 30 June 2009 the Company wrote-off a further $122,029 relating to funds advanced to and expenditures incurred on behalf of Continental Biofuels subsequent to 30 June 2008, but prior to 11 August 200 8.





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    14.

    Differences between Canadian and US GAAP

    Canadian GAAP varies in certain respects from US GAAP. The effect of the principal measurement differences on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is quantified below and described in the accompanying notes:

    a)     (i)

    Under US GAAP, stock-based compensation expense for fiscal years up to 31 July 2003 was recorded for non-employees using a fair-value based method of accounting andOn 21 September 2011, the Company elected underamended the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) APB Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” to adopt only the disclosure provisionsterms of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” prior to 31 July 2003 for employee stock-based compensation. Until 1 August 2002, the Company was not required, under Canadian GAAP, to record the effect of employee or non-employee stock-based compensation expense. Commencing on 1 August 2002, Canadian GAAP treatment requires the recording of the fair value of all stock-based awards at fair value. As the Company elected to adopt the fair value provisions of SFAS 123 effective August 1, 2003, US GAAP is consistent with Canadian GAAP. The e ffect of the differences prior to 1 August 2003 is noted below.

    b)     

    Under US GAAP, stock-based compensation expense is recorded when shares held in escrow become eligible for release and is based upon the number of shares released and the fair value of the shares at that time. Under Canadian GAAP, no value is attributed to such shares released and no compensation expense is recorded. The effect of this difference is noted below.

    c)     

    Under US GAAP, full cost accounting for oil and gas properties, an impairment test is applied to ensure the unamortized capitalized costs in each cost center do not exceed the sum of the present value, discounted at 10%, of the estimated constant dollar, future net operating revenue from proved reserves plus unimpaired unproved property costs less applicable taxes. Under Canadian GAAP, this ceiling test is calculated where cash flows from proved reserves are undiscounted but interest and general and administrative expenses are deducted. If impairment exists, then the amount of the write down is determined using the fair value of reserves. There is no difference between Canadian and US GAAP with respect to the application of the ceiling test as the properties were determined to be impaired as at 30 June 2010 and 2009, and therefore were written down to a nominal value.

    d)     

    Income taxes:

    Under US GAAP, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Under Canadian GAAP, the effect of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period of substantive enactment. The application of this difference under US GAAP does not result in a material difference between future income taxes as recorded under Canadian GAAP.

    e)     

    Under Canadian GAAP, investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the proportionate consolidation method. Under US GAAP, investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method. The different accounting treatment affects only the display and classification of financial statement items and not net earnings or shareholders' equity. As allowed under the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules applicable to Form 20-F, no adjustment has been made for this difference.




    Continental Energy Corporation
    certain outstanding share purchase warrants(An Exploration Stage Company)Note 10)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    The following is a summary of the Company’s proportionate share of the financial position, operating results and cash flows of CGX under Canadian GAAP:

      30 June 2010  30 June 2009  
    Current assets 9,129 13,390 
    Non-current assets  15,601  31,203  
    Total assets 24,730 44,593  
     
    Current liabilities  8,997  7,286  
    Total liabilities 8,997 7,286  

      Year Ended 30  Year Ended 30  Year Ended 30 
      June 2010  June 2009  June 2008 
    Operating Expenses 212,213 296,529 253,329 
    Write-down of resource property costs  1,469  10,988  27,760 
    Net loss for the period 213,682 307,517 281,089 
     
    Net cash used in:          

    Operating activities 

    (149,925(323,629(203,588

    Investing activities 

    - (765(45,371

    Financing activities 

    - - - 




    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    f)     

    The impact of the above differences between Canadian and US GAAP on the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity, as reported, is as follows:

     Common Shares  Contributed  Accumulated    
     Number  Amount  Surplus  Deficit  Total 
     
               
    Shareholders’ equity balance as reported at 30 June 2008 68,887,381 13,319,423 6,350,268 (16,424,2603,245,431 
    Stock compensation expense on option granted to non-employees(Note 14a)   164,573  (164,573 - 
    Stock compensation expense on escrow shares(Note 14b)   139,485  (139,485 - 
               
    Shareholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP at 30 June 2008 68,887,381 13,319,423 6,654,326 (16,728,3183,245,431 
    Shareholders’ equity balance as reported at 30 June 2009 69,747,381 13,419,653 6,699,165 (19,552,847565,971 
    Stock compensation expense on option granted to non-employees(Note 14a)   164,573  (164,573 - 
    Stock compensation expense on escrow shares(Note 14b)   139,485  (139,485 - 
    Shareholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP at 30 June 2009 69,747,381 13,419,653 7,003,223 (19,856,905565,971 
    Shareholders’ equity balance as reported at 30 June 2010 72,390,381 13,522,030 7,140,572 (20,828,233(165,631
    Stock compensation expense op option granted to non-employees(Note 14a)   164,573  (164,573 - 
    Stock compensation expense on escrow shares(Note 14b)   139,485  (139,485 - 
    Shareholders’ equity in accordance with US CAAP at 30 June 2010 72,390,381 13,522,030 7,444,630 (21,132,291(165,631

    g)     

    New Accounting Pronouncements

    In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-11,

    “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives”. ASU No. 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Specifically, only one form of embedded credit derivative qualifies for the exemption – one that is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The amendments in ASU No. 2010-11 are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after 15 June 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after 5 March 2010. The adoption of ASC No. 2010-11 did not have an impact on the Company’s c onsolidated financial statements.

    In February 2010, the FASB ASU No. 2010-09,“Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements”, which eliminates the requirement for Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filers to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events. ASU No. 2010-09 is effective for its fiscal quarter beginning after 15 December 2010. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.




    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2010 and 2009
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06,“Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.”This update requires additional disclosure within the roll forward of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of assets and liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, the update requires enhanced disclosures of the valuation techniques and inputs used in the fair value measurements within Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after 15 December 2009, except for the disclosure of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after 15 December 2010. The adoptio n of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.



    15.Subsequent Events

    a)     

    On 7 July 2010, the Company entered into a Share Sale and Transfer Agreement to sell 100% of the shares in its inactive subsidiary CEPL to Transafrica Management SARL (60%) and C&S Infrastructure LLC (40%) for consideration of $71,500 which is to be paid on or before 31 July 2010. On 31 July 2010, the agreement was amended to extend the 31 July 2010 payment deadline until 1 November 2010.

    b)     

    On 29 August 2010, 10,000,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.90 per share and an expiry date of 29 August 2010 were amended to have a new exercise price of $0.20 and a new expiry date of 29 August 2012.

    c)     

    On 29 September 2010, 600,000 stock options having exercise prices of $0.07 and with an expiry date of 31 December 2010 were amended to have a new expiry date of 31 December 2011.2013. The amount attributable to directors and officers of the Company is $113,000 and was recorded on the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as financing fee - warrants.

    d)     (ii)

    On 29 September 2010, 350,0002 March 2012, a total of 8,000,000 stock options havingwere granted to directors and officers of the Company with an exercise pricesprice of $0.07$0.05 and with varying expiry dates were amendeda term expiring on 31 March 2013(Note 10). The Company calculated the fair value of these stock options to have a new expiry datebe $466,028, which has been charged to the statement of comprehensive loss as share- based payment expense during the year ended 30 June 2012.

    (iii)

    On 4 January 2013, a total of 4,000,000 stock options were granted to directors and officers of the Company and with and exercise price of $0.05 and a term expiring on 31 December 2015(Note 10).The Company calculated the fair value of these stock options to be $26,795, which has been charged to the statement of comprehensive loss as share- based payment expense during the year ended 30 June 2013.

    12.Segmented Information

    The Company’s business consists of only one reportable segment, namely exploration and evaluation of oil and gas properties. Details on a geographical basis are as follows:

     30June30 June
     2013 2012 
    Total Non-Current Assets$ $ 
     
     

    Europe

    862,375 - 

    North America

    - 114,768 

    Southeast Asia

    9,403 14,414 
     871,778 129,182 

    29





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    13.Income Taxes

    The tax expense at statutory rates for the Company can be reconciled to the reported income taxes per the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss as follows:

     For the For the 
     year year 
     ended ended 
     30June30 June
     2013 2012 
     $ $ 
     
    Loss before income taxes(718,315)(1,846,559)
    Canadian federal and provincial income tax rates25% 25.75% 
     
     Income tax recovery based on the above rates(179,579)(475,489)
    Non-deductible expenses45,746 203,826 
    Utilization of losses and US tax pools on dissolution of CGX- (371,032)
    Effect of change in Canadian and foreign deferred tax rates- 90,030 
    Tax effect of losses and temporary differences not recognized133,833 552,665 
     
    Total income taxes- - 

    The Company’s unrecognized deferred tax assets are as follows:

     30June30 June
     2013 2012 
     $ $ 
     
    Non-capital losses1,967,048 1,836,241 
     Capital losses466,497 422,434 
    Resource properties509,467 475,319 
    Capital assets177,112 165,830 
    Share issue costs and other13,756 12,028 
     
    Total unrecognized deferred tax assets3,133,880 2,911,852 

    In assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets other than deferred tax assets resulting from the initial recognition of assets and liabilities that do not affect accounting or taxable profit, the Company’s management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

    30





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    The Company has non-capital loss carry-forwards of approximately $7,868,000 that may be available for tax purposes in Canada as follows:

     $ 
     
    2014467,000
     2015371,000
    2026-
    20271,541,000
    20281,389,000
    20291,483,000
    2030860,000
    2031596,000
    2032619,000
    2033542,000 
     
     7,868,000 

    14.Subsequent Events

    a)

    On 25 July 2013, a private placement was completed for 500,000 units for total proceeds of $25,000. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one half share purchase warrant. Each warrant has a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per common share.

    b)

    On October 1, 2013, the Company granted a total of 2,000,000 share purchase warrants as total compensation to two arm’s length parties in exchange for investor relations and other financial services to the Company. Each warrant has a term of one year and an exercise price of $0.05 per common share.

    c)

    On 4 October 2013, the Company and the holder of the convertible promissory note(Note 9)reached an agreement to extend the maturity date of the promissory note to 15 November 2013 and on 12 December 2013, the Company and the Holder agreed to amend the note by extending the maturity date to 31 January 2014, and to reduce the exercise price of the warrants from $0.08 to $0.05.

    d)

    On 23 October 2013, pursuant to a private placement agreement, the Company issued 300,000 units for total proceeds of $15,000. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant has a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per common share.

    e)

    On 29 September 2010, 7,690,000 stock options having exercise prices7 November 2013 entered into a 50/50 joint bid arrangement with an established Malaysian partner to evaluate opportunities and present carefully selected bids for new oil and gas production sharing contracts offered in Malaysia by PETRONAS, the national oil company.

    f)

    On 7 November 2013, the Company issued a promissory note for proceeds of $0.07 and$100,000. The promissory note accrued interest at 8% per annum with varying expiry dates were amended to have a new expirymaturity date of 15 May 2014. The promissory note was paid in its entirety on 14 March 2014.

    g)

    As a result of late filing, the British Columbia Securities Commission issued a cease trade order on 23 December 2013 and the Alberta Securities Commission issued a cease trade order on 26

    31





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    30 June 2013
    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    March 2014 that prohibited the trading of the Company’s securities in Canada until the required financial reports have been filed and revocation orders have been issued.

    h)

    On 3 March 2014, the Company received proceeds of $750,000 in the form of an interest free loan, The lender has agreed to convert the loan into common shares of the Company at such time as the common shares can be issued.

    h)

    On 31 March 2014, the Company and the hold of the convertible promissory note(Note 9)reached an agreement to extend the maturity date of the promissory note to 30 April 2014 and extended the terms of the warrants to 31 December 2012.2015.

    32








    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
    FORM 51-102F1
    CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORPORATION
    For the Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year EndedEndedJune 30, 2013

    The following management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the Company has been prepared as of April 22, 2014 and is intended to supplement and complement Continental Energy Corporation’s (“Continental” or “the Company”) audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 20102013 and the Company’s MD&A filings for the first three quarters ended March 31, 2013. All financial information has been prepared in accordance with accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). All amounts disclosed are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.

    NATURE OFBUSINESS

    Continental Energy Corporation (“Continental” or the “Company”) isContinentalis an oil and gas exploration company engaged in the assembly of a portfolio of oil and gas exploration properties with high potential resource prospects. Continental is focusing its efforts in IndonesiaSoutheast Asia where large tracts of acreage can be accumulated. There is a long and positive history of oil exploration success in Indonesiathe region and geological conditions are favorable for hydrocarbon accumulation. Continental owns an 18% participating interest in an Indonesian production sharing contract area covering 901,668 acres, the Bengara-II Block. Continentalaccumulation.Continental is an exploration stage company and none of its oil and gas properties currently generate revenue.
    2
    Our accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in Canada. Our

    During the fourth fiscal year end isquarter ended June 30,th. All reported amounts are in United States dollars unless otherwise noted.

    The date of this report is as ofOctober 27, 2010.

    FORWARD-LOOKINGINFORMATION

    This management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to Continental that are based on 2013, the beliefs ofCompany expanded its management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to Continental. When used in this document,business into the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to Continental or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. This MD&A contains forward-looking statements relating to, among other things, regulatory compliance, the sufficiency of current working capital, and the estimated cost and availability of funding for the continued exploration and development of the Company’s oil and gas properties. Such statements reflect the current views of Continental with respect to future eventsoffshore service industry by acquiring a controlling interest in a private Norwegian holding company that owns minority interests in two oil and are subject to certain risks, uncertaintiesgas service and assumptions. Many fact ors could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Aside from factors identified in the annual MD&A, additional important factors, if any, are identified here.support businesses.

    HIGHLIGHTS OF THEPFASTOURTHQUARTER

    The “Past Quarter” ended June 30, 20102013 marks the end of the Fourth Quarter andof the Company’s annual fiscal year.year endedJune 30, 2013. Significant events having material effect on the business affairs of the Company which have occurred during the Past Quarterthree month period ended June 30, 2013 are summarized below:

    Tawau Green Energy Sdn. Bhd (“TGE”)

    On May 7, 2012, the Company entered into an option agreement and acquired 300,000 shares of TGE for 6,000,000 Malaysian Ringgit (“MYR”) ($1,965,600). TGE is a privately held company based in Malaysia and is in the business of developing geothermal energy. Under the terms of the agreement, the first MYR 3,000,000 must be paid by the 1stanniversary of the agreement, May 7, 2013. The remaining MYR 3,000,000 of the investment was to be earned through the Company’s expenditures on a mutually agreed upon work program by the first anniversary of the agreement, or if not the Company must return an amount from its 300,000 TGE shares to the seller in proportion to the Company shortfall. By May 7, 2013, the Company had invested a total of $114,769 in TGE. On May 20, 2013, the Company returned all 300,000 of the TGE shares and wrote off its investment in TGE.

    Convertible Note

    On May 21, 2013, the Company and the holder agreed (1) to amend the Convertible Note by extending the Maturity Date to September 21, 2013, (2) to extend the term of the Warrants to March 21, 2015, and (3) to reduce the exercise price of the Warrants to Eight Cents ($0.08).

    Acquisition of Visionaire Energy

    On June 4, 2013, the Company acquired a 51% shareholding stake in Visionaire Energy AS (“Visionaire”), a privately held Norwegian company. The acquisition was accomplished by an arms-length, non-cash, share-swap transaction with the shareholders of Visionaire. The Company issued 20 million of its common shares, representing a stake of 16.7% in the Company, in exchange for 51% of the authorized and outstanding shares of Visionaire. The principal assets of Visionaire are its management and its shareholdings in two separate, privately owned, offshore oil and gas service providers both based in Bergen, Norway. Visionaire owns a 49% equity interest in VTT Maritime AS (“VTT”) and a 41% equity interest in RADA Engineering and Consulting AS (“RADA”). The shareholders, principals and management of Visionaire also hold senior management positions in VTT and RADA.





    Appointment of New Director
    On June 17, 2013, Johnny Christiansen joined the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Christiansen is the Founder and CEO of Visionaire Invest AS, a Norwegian investment company which owns a 49% stake in Visionaire Energy AS, of which he is also Chairman.

    Visionaire’s New Board of Directors
    On June 18, 2013, the Company’s CEO, Richard L. McAdoo and its CFO, Robert V. Rudman both joined the Board of Directors of Visionaire Energy AS. Current directors include Johnny Christiansen and Per Arne Lislien.

    Share Purchase Warrants Activity
    During the Past Quarter, the following activity involving the Company’s share purchase warrants occurred:

    Exercises- No outstanding share purchase warrants were exercised.

    New Issues No newA total of 150,000 share purchase warrants were issued.

    granted pursuant to a June 2013 private placementwith an exercise price of $0.10 and a term expiring in three years from date of grant.

    Expiry- No oustanding–A total of 1,350,000 share purchase warrants expired.

    expired on June 30, 2013.

    AmendmentsNo amendments were made to the termThe terms of any3,975,000 and 1,812,500 outstanding share purchase warrants.warrants having exercise prices of $0.07 and $0.12 and expiry date of December 31, 2013 and September 21, 2013 respectively, were modified to have an exercise price of $0.05 and $0.08 and expiry dates of December 31, 2015 and March 15, 2015 respectively.

    Incentive Stock Options Activity
    During the Past Quarter, the following activity involving the Company’s incentive stock options occurred:

    Exercises- No outstanding incentive stock options were exercised.

    New Grants– No new incentive stock options were granted.

    Expiry- No outstanding incentive stock options expired.

    Amendments– No amendments were made to the terms of any outstanding incentive stock options.

    Common Share Conversion Rights Activity


    During the Past Quarter, the following activity involving the common share conversion rights issued by the Company occurred:

    Exercises- There were no exercises of outstanding common share conversion rights.

    New Issues– There were no new common shares conversion rights issued.

    Expiry– No outstanding common shares conversion rights expired.

    Amendments– There were no amendments to the terms of any outstanding common share conversion rights.

    Shares Issues
    During the Past Quarter, no20,300,000 new shares were issued.

    Pursuant to a share swap agreement dated June 4, 2013, the Company issued a total of 20 million new common shares representing 16.7% of the total outstanding shares to Visionaire Invest AS, a privately held Norwegian corporation in exchange for 1,530 shares of Visionaire Energy AS representing a 51% equity ownership. The remaining 49% interest continues to be held by Visionaire Invest AS. The principal assets of Visionaire Energy AS are its management and its shareholdings in two separate, privately owned, offshore oil and gas service providers both based in Bergen, Norway.

    On June 28, 2013, a private placement was completed for 300,000 units for total proceeds of $15,000.Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half share purchase warrant, with an exercise price of $0.10 per share and a term expiring in three years from the date of the grant.

    SHAREHOLDING

    As of June 30, 2013, the Company had122,815,381common shares issued and outstanding.
    As of June 30, 2013, the Company had15,800,000unexercised stock options issued and outstanding.
    As of June 30, 2013, the Company had11,555,500unexercised warrants issued and outstanding.
    As of June 30, 2013, the Company hadNilpreferred shares issued and outstanding.
    As of June 30, 2013, the Company was a borrower of a $250,000 note convertible into5,000,000common shares.





    SUBSEQUENTEVENTS

    The “Past QuarterQuarter”ended June 30, 20102013 marks the end of the Fourth Quarter andof the Company’s annual fiscal year ending JuneendedJune 30, 2010.2013. Significant events possibly having material effect on the business affairs of the Company which have occurred since the end of the Past Quarter but prior to publication of this report are summarized below:include the following:

    Investment ActivityJoint Venture in Malaysia

    Subsequent to the end of the Past Quarter and up to the date of this report, the following activity involving the Company’s investments occurred:

    Share Purchase Warrants Activity
    Subsequent to the end of the Past Quarter and up to the date of this report, the following activity involving the Company’s share purchase warrants occurred:

    Exercises- No outstanding share purchase warrants were exercised.

    New IssuesNoDuring the period, a total of 2,550,000 new warrants were issued.

    On July 25, 2013, a private placement was completed for 500,000 units for total proceeds of $25,000. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one half share purchase warrant. The 250,000 warrants have a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per common share.





    On October 1, 2013, the Company granted a total of 2,000,000 share purchase warrants were issued.

    as total compensation to two arm’s length parties in exchange for investor relations and other financial services to the Company. Each warrant has a term of one year and an exercise price of $0.05 per common share.

    On October 21, 2013, pursuant to a private placement agreement, the Company issued 300,000 units for total proceeds of $15,000. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant has a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per common share.

    Expiry- No share purchase warrants expired.

    expired during this period.

    AmendmentsOn August 29, 2010 the Company amendedNo amendments were made to the terms of certainany outstanding incentive warrants to bring them into line with the current market conditions as follows:

    Incentive Stock Options Activity

    Subsequent to the end of the Past Quarter and up to the date of this report, the following activity involving the Company’s incentive stock options occurred:

    Exercises- No outstanding incentive stock options were exercised.

    New Grants– No new incentive stock options were granted.

    Expiry– No outstanding incentive stock options expired.

    AmendmentsOn September 29, 2010 the Company amendedNo amendments were made to the terms of certainany outstanding incentive stock options to bring them into line with the current market conditions as follows:options.

    Shares Issues
    Subsequentno amendments to the endterms of the Past Quarterany outstanding common share conversion rights.

    Shares Issues

    The Company issued 800,000 new common shares pursuant to a June and up to the date of this report, no new shares were issued.October private placementas described above.





    SHAREHOLDING

    As of the date of this reportReport Date, the Company had72,390,381123,615,381common shares issued and outstanding.
    As of the date of this reportReport Date, the Company had10,750,00015,800,000unexercised stock options issued and outstanding.
    As of the date of this reportReport Date, the Company had17,968,00014,105,500unexercised warrants issued and outstanding.
    As of the date of this reportReport Date, the Company hadNilpreferred shares issued and outstanding.
    As of this Report Date, the Company was a borrower of a $250,000 note convertible into5,000,000common shares.

    RESULTS OFOPERATIONS

    Financial Results for the Fourth QuarterQuarterand Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
    2013

    The Past Quarter“Past Quarter” ended June 30, 20102013 marks the end of the Fourth Quarter andof the Company’s annual fiscal year ending.endedJune 30, 2013.

    The following table sets out selected annual information of Continental and is derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the twelve months and fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 20092013, 2012 and 2008.2011. The Company’s annual consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting policies consistent with IFRS.

    2013 2012 2011 
     2010 2009 2008  $  $  $ 
    Sales - - - Nil Nil Nil 
    Income (Loss) for the Year (1,275,386(3,128,587(3,116,762(700,115)(1,846,559)(1,893,765)
    Income (Loss) per Share – Basic (0.02(0.05(0.05(0.01)(0.02)(0.03)
    Income (Loss) per Share – Diluted (0.02(0.05(0.05(0.01)(0.02)(0.03)
    Total Assets 119,156 635,709 3,297,806 896,627 298,144 44,484 
    Total Long-term Liabilities - - - 
    Total Long-Term LiabilitiesNil Nil Nil 
    Dividends Declared Nil Nil Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil 





    The following table sets out selected unaudited quarterly financial information of Continental and is derived from unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements as filed on SEDAR.prepared by management. Theseunaudited interimfinancial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting policies consistent with IFRS.

    Period Revenues Loss from Continued
    Operations and Net
    Income (loss)
    Basic Income (Loss)
    per Share from
    Continued Operations
    and Net Income (loss)
    Fully Diluted Income
    per Share from
    Continued Operations
    and Net Income (loss)
    4thQuarter 2010 Nil (245,489)(0.00)(0.00)
    3rdQuarter 2010 Nil (409,091)(0.01)(0.01)
    2ndQuarter 2010 Nil (273,499)(0.00)(0.00)
    1stQuarter 2010 Nil (347,307)(0.00)(0.00)
    4thQuarter 2009 Nil (264,481)(0.00)(0.00)
    3rdQuarter 2009 Nil (1,638,935)(0.02)(0.02)
    2ndQuarter 2009 Nil (701,874)(0.01)(0.01)
    1stQuarter 2009 Nil (523,297)(0.01)(0.01)
       Income (loss)Basic and Diluted
       from ContinuedIncome (Loss) per
       Operations andShare from Continued
       Net IncomeOperations and Net
      Revenues(loss)Income (loss)
    Period $  $  $ 
    4thQuarter 2013Nil 47,508 0.00
    3rdQuarter 2013Nil (446,450) (0.01)
    2ndQuarter 2013Nil(144,702)(0.00)
    1stQuarter 2013Nil(156,471)(0.00)
    4thQuarter 2012Nil (208,463)(0.00)
    3rdQuarter 2012Nil(1,198,449)(0.01)
    2ndQuarter 2012Nil(127,534)(0.00)
    1stQuarter 2012 Nil  (312,113 ) (0.00 )





    Current Working Capital Situation

    As at June 30, 2010,Quarterly results will vary in accordance with the Company’s consolidated financial statements reflect a workingexploration and financing activities. The Company’s primary source of funding is through the issuance of share capital. When the capital deficitmarkets are depressed, the Company’s activity level normally declines accordingly. As capital markets strengthen and the Company is able to secure equity financing with favourable terms, the Company’s activity levels and the size and scope of $184,598. This represents a decreaseplanned exploration projects will increase.

    Another factor that affects the Company’s reported quarterly results are write-downs or write-offs of capitalized exploration and evaluation assets and its investments. The Company will write-down or write-off capitalized exploration and evaluation assets when exploration results indicate that no further work is warranted and also write-down or write-off its balances in investees if it determines that capitalized balances of these investments are impaired. The size and timing of these write-downs and write-offs cannot typically be predicted and affect the Company’s quarterly results. The Company regularly reviews its oil and gas properties and investments for any indications of impairment.

    Non-cash costs such as share based payments expense and financing feesalso affect the size of the Company’s quarterly income (loss).

    The activities of the Company’s associates, VTT and RADA, also cause quarterly variances in the working capital of $712,636 compared to the June 30, 2009 working capital of $528,038. The main use of funds during the current period was the Company’s general and administrative expenditures during the period. The cash balance at June 30, 2010 was $88,843 compared to $591,930 as at June 30, 2009, a decrease of $503,087.operations.

    Year ended June 30, 2010 compared with $1,083,322 in the year ended June 30, 2009.2013

    The cash resources used for investing activities during the year ended June 30, 2010 was $1,469 compared with $1,446,904 for the year ended June 30, 2009.

    The cash resources provided by financing activities during the year ended June 30, 2010 was $185,010 compared with $54,000 in the year ended June 30, 2009.

    Investments

    The Company’s oil and gas property expenditures continue to be at a maintenance level until management decides to commence further exploration and development of its Indonesian properties. In the prior year, the Company incurred property acquisition costs related to the Tungkal acquisition and the South Bengara-II acquisition amounting to $1,313,123 and costs relating to its investment in Continental Biofuels amounting to $122,028.

    Finance

    During the year ended June 30, 2010, a total of 2,643,000 new shares were issued pursuant to private placements for net proceeds to the Company of $185,010.

    On June 30, 2010, the Company had options outstanding granted to directors, officers and consultants to purchase an aggregate of 10,750,000 shares at a price of $0.07 and expiring at varying dates between December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011.

    On June 30, 2010, the Company had warrants outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 17,968,000 shares at prices ranging from $0.07 to $0.90 and expiring at varying dates between August 29, 2010 and February 26, 2013.

    Operations for the Year Ended June 30, 2010

    Overall, the Company had a loss from operations during the year ended June 30, 20102013 of $1,275,386$700,115 compared to $3,128,587$1,846,559 in the year ended June 30, 2009.2012, a decrease in loss of $1,146,444. The Company had a loss per share of $0.02$0.01 in 20102013 compared to a loss per share of $0.05$0.02 in 2009.

    During the period, the Company generated $5 in interest income compared with $12,717 in the prior period. The decrease is due to lower cash balances on hand during the current period.

    In the prior period, the Company wrote off its property acquisition costs related to the Tungkal acquisition and the South Bengara-II acquisition amounting to $1,313,123 and its investment in Continental Biofuels amounting to $122,029. The Company did not have any similar write offs during the year ended June 30, 2010.2012.

    General and administrative expenses decreased by $442,092$862,146 from $1,716,014$1,501,366 to $1,273,922$639,220 for the years ended June 30, 20092012 and 20102013, respectively. The significant changesdecrease is primarily attributable tothe lower share-based payments expense of $52,250 compared to general$692,182 in 2012 and administrative expenses arefinancing fee of $nil compared to $160,994, as follows. Management salaries and wages decreased $421,180 from $791,070 to $369,890 as the Company did not have a CFO in place for the first 3 monthsresult of the yeardifferences in the Company’s estimates for such items in the two years. The Company’s investor relations costs were also higher in 2012 due to the Company’s promotional activities at the time. The investor relations costs were $41,915 in 2012 and only $2,181 in 2013.

    The overall loss was also higher in 2012 as well as all other management taking a reductionresult of the Company’s issuance of shares in pay effective April 1, 2009. Office expenses decreased $36,594 from $133,784 to $97,190 as the former CFO’s Dallas office was closedsettlement of its accounts payable. This resulted in an additional loss of $368,000 during the prior year. Travel and accommodation decreased by $63,167 from $106,283 to $43,116 as the Company was not working on any acquisition deals during the period that required extensive travel. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense, relating to management and consulting contracts, of $279,766 for the year ended June 30, 2010 compared to $376,127 in2012. During the year ended June 30, 2009 fo r a decrease of $96,361. The current period expense relates to options and warrants granted to Robert Rudman, the Company’s new CFO, the Company’s President and COO, Andrew Erikkson, the Company’s Geophysicist, Robert Paul, Agoracom Investor Relations Corp. (“Agoracom”), Aspen Capital Partners LLC (“Aspen”) and the incremental increase in fair value from the options that were amended during the period. Investor relations fees increased from $3,724 to $39,070. This is due to2013, the Company commencing more investor relations activities withreturned the engagement300,000 common shares of Agoracom. Consulting fees increased from $9,750 to $92,500Tawau Green Energy Sdn. Bhd (“TGE”) acquired in fiscal 2012. The cost of such investment in TGE of $114,769 was written off during fiscal 2013. During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company also recorded income of $37,143 as thea result of an agreement that was signed with Aspenequity accounting for its investments in September. Financing fees increased from $nil to $93,808 as the result of the revaluation of several warrant grants during the period. All other expense groups do not significantly differ from the prior period.VTT and RADA.





    Operations for

    All other costs remained consistent with the Three Month Period Endedyear ended June 30, 2010


    2012.

    Three month period ended June 30, 2013

    Overall, the Company had a lossincome from operations during the three month period ended June 30, 20102013 of $245,489$47,508 (“Current Quarter”) compared to $264,481a loss of $208,463 in the yearthree month period ended June 30, 2009.2012 (“Comparative Quarter”), an increase in overall income or decrease in loss of $255,971. The Company had basic and diluted income per share of $0.00 in 2013 compared to a loss per share of$0.00 in 2012.

    DuringThe decrease in loss or an increase in income is primarily attributable to the period, the Company generated $2 in interest income compared with $6,407change in the prior period. The decrease is dueCompany’s estimate related to lower cash balances on handshare-based payments expense and finance fees – warrants during the current period.Current Quarter. The Company revised its estimate for the fair value of the share-based payments expense from $152,880 to $52,250 and for financing fees – warrants from $154,352 to $nil in the Current Quarter. These revisions in estimates resulted in income of $254,982 compared to net expense of $26,157 resulting in overall additional income of $281,139. The Company also recorded income in the Current Quarter of $37,143 as a result of equity accounting for its investments in VTT and RADA.

    InThe Company returned 300,000 common shares of TGE in its possession during the prior period,three months ended June 30, 2013, resulting in a write-off of such investment balance of $114,769 during the Company wrote off its property acquisitionCurrent Quarter, offsetting the above income.

    Most other costs related toremained consistent between the Tungkal acquisitionCurrent Quarter and the South Bengara-II acquisition amounting to $59,696 and its investmentComparative Quarter.

    Liquidity

    As at June 30, 2013, the Company’s consolidated financial statements reflect a working capital deficit of $744,691. As at June 30, 2012, the Company’s consolidated financial statements reflected a working capital deficit of $277,815.

    Cash used in Continental Biofuels amounting to $39,218. The Company did not have any similar write offsoperating activities during the year ended June 30, 2010.

    General and administrative expenses increased by $18,992 from $206,011 to $245,295 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 respectively. The significant changes to general and administrative expenses are as follows. Management salaries and wages decreased $12,030 from $105,164 to $93,134 as the Company did not have a CFO2013 totaled $189,464, compared with $628,375 in place during the prior year period. Office expenses decreased $17,065 from $42,034 to $24,969 as the former CFO’s Dallas office was closed during the prior year. Travel and accommodation decreased by $21,431Cash from $28,914 to $7,483 as the Company was not working on any acquisition dealsinvesting activities during the period that required extensive travel. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense, relating to management and consulting contracts, of $8,666 compared to $Nil in the prior year for an increase of $8,666. The current period expense relates to warrants granted to Agoracom Investor Relations Corp. (“Agoracom” ;). Investor relations fees increased from $1,965 to $4,500. This is due to the Company commencing more investor relations activities. Consulting fees increased from $Nil to $18,500 as the result of an agreement that was signed with Aspen in September. Financing fees increased from $nil to $79,008 as the result of the revaluation of several warrant grants during the period. All other expense groups do not significantly differ from the prior period.

    ADDITIONALDISCLOSURE

    The “Past Quarter” ended June 30, 2010 marks the end of the Fourth Quarter and the Company’s annual fiscal year.

    Material Contracts & Commitments
    During the Past Quarter, no new material contracts or commitments were undertaken and not elsewhere disclosed herein or in the unaudited and management prepared financial statements for the Past Quarter published herewith.

    Related Party Transactions
    During the Past Quarter, no new related party agreements, or modifications to existing agreements, of any kind were made by the Company which are not otherwise already disclosed herein or in the unaudited and management prepared financial statements for the Past Quarter published herewith.

    Expenditures made by the Company to related parties during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 and balances receivable from related parties as at June 30, 2010 are as follows:





    Investor Relations, Publicity and Promotion
    During the Past Quarter, no new arrangements, or modifications to existing agreements, were made by the Company for investor relations services, publicity, promotion or advertising agreements which are not otherwise already disclosed herein.

    Finder's Agreements, Financial Advice & Fund Raising
    During the Past Quarter, no new arrangements, or modifications to existing agreements, were made by the Company relating to financial advice, fund raising or finder's agreements which are not otherwise already disclosed herein.

    Significant Accounting Policies
    The details of the Company’s accounting policies are presented in note 2 and elsewhere in the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The following policies are considered by management to be essential to understanding the processes and reasoning that go into the preparation of the Company’s financial statements and the uncertainties that could have a bearing on the financial results:

    Oil and Gas Properties
    The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas operations, as prescribed by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, whereby all costs of exploring for and developing oil and gas reserves are capitalized and accumulated in cost centres established on a country-by-country basis. Such costs include land acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenses, carrying charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling both productive and non-productive wells, interest costs on significant investments in unproved properties and major development projects and overhead charges directly related to acquisition, exploration and development activities, less any government incentives relating thereto.

    Upon establishing production, the costs related to each cost centre from which there is production, together with the costs of production equipment, will be depleted and amortized on the unit-of-production method based on the estimated gross proved reserves of each country. Oil and natural gas reserves and production will be converted into equivalent units based upon estimated relative energy content. Costs of acquiring and evaluating significant unproved properties will be initially excluded from depletion calculations. These unevaluated properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether impairment in value has occurred. When proved reserves are assigned or the value of the property is considered to be impaired, the cost of the property or the amount of the impairment will be added to costs subject to depletion.

    The capitalized costs less accumulated amortization in each cost centre from which there is production will be limited to an amount equal to the estimated future net revenue from proved reserves (based on estimated future prices and costs at the balance sheet date) plus the cost (net of impairments) of unproved properties ("ceiling test"). The total capitalized costs less accumulated depletion and amortization and deferred taxes of all cost centres will be further limited to an amount equal to the estimated future net revenue from proved reserves plus the cost (net of impairments) of all unproved properties less estimated future general and administrative expenses, future financing costs and taxes.

    The costs (including exploratory dry holes) related to cost centres from which there has been no commercial production are not subject to depletion until commercial production commences. The capitalized costs are assessed annually to determine whether it is likely such costs will be recovered in the future. Costs unlikely to be recovered in the future are written off.

    Proceeds from the farm-out of oil and gas properties are applied against capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized, unless such a sale would significantly alter the rate of depletion and amortization.

    Management’s Estimates
    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant areas of assumptions are: impairment of resource properties, the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of options, the useful life of long-lived assets, the fair values of financial instruments, and the future tax rates used to determine future income taxes.





    Change in Accounting Policies

    Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Section 3064)
    Effective July 1, 2009 the Company adopted CICA HB Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, which replaces Section 3062, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” and CICA Section 3450, “Research and Development Costs,” and amendments to Accounting Guideline (“AcG”) 11, “Enterprises in the Development Stage,” and EIC-27, “Revenues and Expenditures. During the Pre-operating Period” and CICA Section 1000, “Financial Statement Concepts.” The standard intends to reduce the differences with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) in the accounting for intangible assets and results in closer alignment with US GAAP. Under current Canadian standards, more items are recognized as assets than under IFRS or US GAAP. The objectives of CICA Section 3064 are to reinforce the principle-based approach to the recognition of assets only in accordance with the definition of an asset and the criteria for asset recognition; and clar ify the application of the concept of matching revenues and expenses such that the current practice of recognizing assets that do not meet the definition and recognition criteria are eliminated. The standard will also provide guidance for the recognition of internally developed intangible assets (including research and development activities), ensuring consistent treatment of all intangible assets, whether separately acquired or internally developed. The Company has evaluated the new section and determined that adoption of these new requirements has no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

    International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
    In 2006, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) published a new strategic plan that will significantly affect financial reporting requirements for Canadian companies. The AcSB strategic plan outlines the convergence of Canadian GAAP with IFRS over an expected five year transitional period. In February 2008 the AcSB announced that 2011 is the changeover date for publicly-listed companies to use IFRS, replacing Canadian GAAP. This date is for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. For the Company, the transition date will be July 1, 2011 will require the restatement for comparative purposes of amounts reported by the Company for the year ended June 30, 2010.2013 was $15,544 whereas there was $125,251 expended on such activities during the year ended June 30, 2012. The Company is currently assessingsignificantly greater cash outflow during the financial reporting impactprior year was primarily due to the Company’s option agreement related to its investment in TGE.

    Financing activities provided $42,948 primarily from the proceeds of a private placement.In the transitionprior comparative period, a $750,000 private placement and a $250,000 convertible promissory noteprovided the funding for financing activities. The repayment of loans to IFRSrelated parties and certain promissory notes reduced the changeover date.net proceeds to $889,170.

    Capital Resources

    The Company has appointed a project manager to lead the conversion to IFRS. The project manager is working with other members of the finance group to develop and execute an implementation plan. An initial diagnostic review ofno significant IFRS differences is currently underway to identify the key areas which are likely to be impacted by accounting policy changes. After which, the Company will perform a more detailed review of the impact of IFRS on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and other areas of the Company. Any changes required to systems and controls will be identified as the project progresses.

    Draft financial statements and disclosure information will be prepared for each quarter in 2011 and reporting under IFRS will commence in the first quarter of 2012. While the Company has begun assessing the adoption of IFRS, the financial reporting impact of the transition to IFRS cannot be reasonable estimated at this time.

    Business Combinations – Section 1582
    In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1582, “Business Combinations” (“CICA 1582”), CICA 1582 requires that all assets and liabilities of an acquired business will be recorded at fair value at acquisition. Obligations for contingent considerations and contingencies will also be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The standard also states that acquisition-related costs will be expensed as incurred and that restructuring charges will be expensed in the periods after the acquisition date. The Section applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its financial statements.

    Consolidations and Non-controlling interest – Sections 1601 and 1602
    In January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1601, “Consolidations” (“CICA 1601”), and Section 1602, “Non-controlling Interests” (“CICA 1602”). CICA 1601 establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. CICA 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. These standards apply to interim and annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its financial statements.





    Capital Resources
    The Company has no operations that generate cash flow and its long term financial success is dependantdependent on management’s ability to discover economically viable oil and gas deposits. The oildeposits and gas exploration processthe Company’s success in the renewable energy sector. These undertakings can take many years and isare subject to factors that are beyond the Company’s control.

    In order to finance the Company’s exploration programs and to cover administrative and overhead expenses, the Company raises money through equity sales and from the exercise of convertible securities. Many factors influence the Company’s ability to raise funds, including the health of the resource market, the climate for oil and gas exploration investment, the Company’s track record and the experience and caliber of its management.

    With a working capital deficit of $184,598$744,691 as at June 30, 2010,2013and additional anticipated cost commitments, the Company will not have sufficient funds to meet its administrative, corporate development and exploration activities over the next twelve months. Actual funding requirements may vary from those planned due to a number of factors. The Company believes it will be able to raise the necessary capital it requires, but recognizes there will be risks involved that may be beyond its control. During the year ended June 30, 2010 theThe Company retained the services of a financial advisor and an investment banker who areis actively sourcing capital for the Company.new capital.

    Risks and Uncertainties

    The Company has no history of profitable operations and its present business is at an early stage. As such, the Company is subject to many risks common to such enterprises, including under-capitalization, cash shortages and





    limitations with respect to personnel, financial and other resources and the lack of revenues. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in achieving a return on shareholders' investment and the likelihood of success must be considered in light of its early stage of operations.

    The Company has no source of operating cash flow and no assurance that additional funding will be available to it for further exploration and development of its projects when required. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities or joint ventures, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain adequate financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favorable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in the delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of its properties.properties and other ventures.

    RecentThe continued degradation of the market conditions for the financing of equity and/or debt for oil and gas exploration and development companies has created additional uncertainty for future financing of the acquisition or development of the Company’s projects.

    The Company’s property interests are located in remote, undeveloped areas and the availability of infrastructure such as surface access, skilled labour,labor, fuel and power at an economic cost, cannot be assured. These are integral requirements for exploration, development and production facilities on oil and gas properties. Power may need to be generated on site.

    Oil and gas exploration is a speculative venture. There is no certainty that the money spent on exploration and development will result in the discovery of an economic oil or gas accumulation. There is no assurance that the Company's exploration activities will result in any discoveries of commercial accumulations of oil or gas. The long-term profitability of the Company's operations will in part be related to the success of its exploration programs, which may be affected by a number of factors that are beyond the control of the Company.

    The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive in all its phases. The Company competes with many other oil and gas exploration companies who have greater financial resources and technical capacity.

    The market price of energy is volatile and cannot be controlled.

    The Company is very dependent upon the personal efforts and commitment of its existing management. To the extent that management's services would be unavailable for any reason, a disruption to the operations of the Company could result, and other persons would be required to manage and operate the Company.

    Financial Instruments

    Fair valueSegment Information

    The Company’s financial instruments consistbusiness consists of cash, accounts receivabletwo reportable segments, namely an investment in a Norwegian holding company involved in the oil and accounts payable. Cash is carried at fair value usinggas offshore service industry and a level 1 fair value measurement. The carrying value ofJakarta, Indonesia based oil and gas exploration and evaluation operating business. Details on a geographical basis for the receivables and accounts payable approximates their fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, price or credit risks arising from its financial instruments.Company’s non-current assets are as follows:

     30June30 June
     2013 2012 
    Total Non-Current Assets $  $ 
     

    Europe

    862,375 - 

    North America

    - 114,768 

    Southeast Asia

     9,403  14,414 
      871,778  129,182 





    ADDITIONALDISCLOSURE

    Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
    The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements not already disclosed elsewhere in the MD&A.

    Material Contracts & Commitments
    During the year, no new material contracts or commitments were undertaken, not elsewhere disclosed herein or in the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2013.

    Related Party Transactions

    Details of the transactions and balances between the Company and its related parties are disclosed below.

    a)     

    Transactions with related parties

    As at June 30, 2013, $260,925 (2012 - $87,775) was payable to officers of the Company. This amount is included in accounts payable and is unsecured, non-interest bearing and has no specific terms for repayment.

    As at June 30, 2013, there was a loan payable of $27,107 (2012 - $27,926) to an officer of the Company. The note accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum, is unsecured and is due on September 21, 2013. During the year ended June 30, 2013, interest expense in the amount of $733 (2012 - $2,218) was accrued. The Company’s total repayment amounted to $19,899 during the year ended June 30, 2013, of which $13,123 was applied against the principal balance and $6,776 was applied to interest. The related party advanced a further $18,347 to the Company under the same terms as the original promissory note.

    During January 2013, the Company completed a private placement of 2,975,000 units with each unit priced at $0.05 and consisting of one common share and one warrant. A total of 1,500,000 units were issued to the officers of the Company to extinguish debt of $30,000.

    b)     

    Compensation of key management personnel

      For the For the 
      year year 
      ended ended 
      30June30 June
     Note2013 2012 
         $  $ 
    Financing fees(i)- 113,000 
    Management and consulting fees  270,000 247,500 
    Share-based payments expense (ii) (iii)  26,796  466,028 
           296,796  826,528 

    (i)     

    On September 21, 2011, the Company amended the terms of certain outstanding share purchase warrants to have a new expiry date of December 31, 2013. The amount attributable to directors and officers of the Company is $113,000 and was recorded on the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as financing fee - warrants.

    (ii)     

    On March 2, 2012, a total of 8,000,000 stock options were granted to directors and officers of the Company with an exercise price of $0.05 and a term expiring on March 31, 2013. The Company calculated the fair value of these stock options to be $466,028, which has been charged to the statement of comprehensive loss as share-based payment expense during the year ended 30 June 2012.

    (iii)     

    On January 4, 2013, a total of 4,000,000 stock options were granted to directors and officers of the Company and with an exercise price of $0.05 and a term expiring on December 31, 2015.The Company calculated the fair value of these stock options to be $26,795, which has been charged to the statement of comprehensive loss as share-based payment expense during the year ended June 30, 2013.





    Investor Relations, Publicity and Promotion
    No material new arrangements, or modifications to existing agreements, were made by the Company for investor relations services, publicity, promotion or advertising agreements which are not otherwise already disclosed above in Highlights of the Past Quarter or in Subsequent Events.

    Financial Advice, New Business Consulting, Finder's Agreements, & Fund Raising
    No material new arrangements, or modifications to existing agreements, were made by the Company for financial advice, new business consulting, finder's arrangements, or fund raising which are not otherwise already disclosed above in Highlights of the Past Quarter or in Subsequent Events.

    Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
    The details of the Company’s accounting policies are presented in Note 3 of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the period endedJune 30, 2013. The following policies are considered by management to be essential for understanding the processes and reasoning that go into the preparation of the Company’s financial statements and the uncertainties that could have a bearing on its financial results:

    a)

    Significant Accounting Estimates and Judgments

    The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, profit and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

    The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and further periods if it affects both current and future periods.

    ManagementCritical accounting estimates

    Significant assumptions relate to, but are not limited to, the following:

    i)

    Share-based compensation

    The Company provides compensation benefits to its employees, directors and officers through a stock option plan. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s share price. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and forfeiture rates within the valuation model. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the yields of government bonds. Changes in these assumptions, especially the volatility and the expected life determination could have a material impact on the Company’s comprehensive loss for the year. When the Company determines it necessary to modify the terms of the options, the Black-Scholes option pricing model is utilized at the date of the modification and uses the modified terms in order to calculate the incremental change in value of the original option. The use of option-pricing model and a change in assumptions used within the model could result in a material impact on the Company’s comprehensive loss for the year.

    ii)

    Warrant valuation

    The Company grants warrants in conjunction with private placements and as compensation for debt financing arrangements. The fair value of each warrant granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s share price. The Company uses historical data to estimate warrant exercises and forfeiture rates within the valuation model. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the warrant is based on the yields of government bonds. Changes in these assumptions, especially the volatility and the expected life determination could have a material impact on the Company’s comprehensive loss for the year. When the Company determines it necessary to modify the terms of a warrants, the Black-Scholes option pricing model is utilized at the date of the modification and uses the modified terms in order to calculate the incremental change in value of the original warrant, if the warrants were originally issued as compensation.





    The use of option-pricing model and a change in assumptions used within the model could result in a material impact on the Company’s comprehensive loss for the year.

    Critical Judgments

    i)

    Promissory notes payable:

    The Company, from time to time, may grant convertible instruments as part of its financing and capital raising transactions. A compound financial instrument is a debt security with an embedded conversion option or attached warrants and requires the separate recognition of the liability and equity components. The fair value of the liability portion of the compound financial instrument is determined using a market interest rate for an equivalent debt instrument. This amount is recorded as a liability and the remainder of the proceeds is allocated to the conversion option and attached warrants which are recognized in the conversion option reserves and share based payment reserves respectively. This makes assumptions as to the market value of the debt instrument without the conversion feature. A change in the assumptions could result in modifications to the discount rate and could have a material impact on the effective interest rate of the instrument.

    ii)

    Recovery of deferred tax assets:Judgment is required in determining whether deferred tax assets are recognized on the statement of financial position. Deferred tax assets require management to assess the likelihood that the Company will generate taxable income in future periods in order to utilize recognized deferred tax assets. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. The Company has not recognized any deferred tax assets on the statement of consolidated financial position as at June 30, 2013.

    b)

    Exploration and Evaluation Assets

    Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the costs of acquiring licenses, costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity, and the fair value (at acquisition date) of exploration and evaluation assets acquired in a business combination. Exploration and evaluation expenditures are capitalized. Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are recognized in profit or loss. Government tax credits received are recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

    Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if (i) sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and (ii) facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

    Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested for impairment and then reclassified to mining property and development assets within property, plant and equipment. Recoverability of the carrying amount of any exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.

    Accounting Policies – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

    Certain new standards, interpretations, amendments and improvements to existing standards were issued by the IASB or IFRIC. The Standards impacted that are applicable to the Company are as follows:

    a)     

    IFRS 7 Financial Instruments – Disclosure (“IFRS 7”) was amended to require additional disclosures on transition from IAS 39 to IFRS 9. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

    b)     

    IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”) was issued by IASB in October 2010 and will replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (“IAS 39”). IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. There are two measurement categories: amortized cost and fair value. All equity instruments are measured at fair value. A debt instrument is at amortized cost only if the entity is holding it to collect contractual cash flows and the cash flows represent principal and interest. Otherwise it is at fair value through profit or loss.

    The standard has no mandatory effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard.





    c)     

    IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”), was issued in May 2011 will superseded the consolidation requirements in SIC-12, Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities (“SIC-12”), and IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (“IAS 27”). IFRS 10 builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as a determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements of the parent company. The standard also provides additional guidance to assist in the determination of control where this is difficult to assess.

    The Company early adopted the standard on July 1, 2012. The adoption of the standard did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidation status.

    d)     

    IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements (“IFRS 11”), was issued in May 2011 and superseded IAS 31, Joint Ventures (“IAS 31”). IFRS 11 provides for the accounting of joint arrangements by focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, rather than its legal form (as is currently the case). The Standard also eliminates the option to account for jointly controlled entities using the proportionate consolidation method.

    The Company early adopted the standard on July 1, 2012. The adoption of the standard did not have any impact on the Company.

    e)     

    IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (“IFRS 12”), was issued in May 2011 and is a new and comprehensive standard on disclosure requirements for all forms of interest in other entities, including subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated structured entities. The Company early adopted the standard on July 1, 2012. The adoption of the standard did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

    f)     

    IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurements (“IFRS 13”) was issued in May 2011 and sets out, in a single IFRS, a framework for measuring fair value. IFRS 13 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This definition of fair value emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity specific measurement. In addition, IFRS 13 also requires specific disclosures about fair value measurement. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with earlier application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

    g)     

    IAS 1, Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) (“IAS 1”), was revised in June 2011 to change the disclosure of items presented in OCI, including a requirement to separate items presented in OCI into two groups based on whether or not they may be recycled to profit or loss in the future. The Company does not have any items that impact OCI and therefore the revisions to IAS 1 did not have any impact on the financial statements of the Company.

    Financial Instruments

    Categories of financial riskinstruments

     June 30,June 30,
     20132012
      $  $ 
    Financial assets  

    Loans and receivables

      

    Cash

    21,999152,971

    Investments

    -114,769

    Receivables

     2,333  2,391 
     
      24,332  270,131 





     June 30June 30,
     20132012
      $  $ 
    Financial liabilities  

    Other financial liabilities

      

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    431,263149,206

    Loan payable to related party

    27,10727,926

    Convertible debt

     311,171  269,645 
     
      769,541  446,777 

    Financial Risk Management

    The Company’s financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, includingrisks. The risk exposures and the impact on the Company’s financial instruments are summarized below.

    a)     

    Currency risk

    The Company is primarily exposed to currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate riskfluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar through expenditures that are denominated in Canadian dollars and price risk.Indonesian Rupiahs. Also, the Company is exposed to the impact of currency fluctuations on its foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities.

    Currency risk

    The Company is exposed to the financial risk related to the fluctuation of foreign exchange rates. The Company operates in Canada and Indonesia and a portion of its expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars and Indonesian Rupiah. A significant change in the currency exchange rates between the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar and the Indonesian Rupiah to the US dollar could have an effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The Company has not hedged its exposure to currency fluctuations. At 30 June 2010, the Company is exposed to currency risk through the following financial assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, Singapore dollars and Indonesian Rupiah:currencies other than U.S. dollars:

     Canadian
    Dollars
    $
    30 June 2010
    Singapore
    Dollars
    Indonesian
    Rupiah
    Cash and cash equivalents 30411,80111,911,357
    Receivables 1,881--
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (32,793)-72,236,435
          Accounts 
          payable and 
          accrued 
    30 June 2013 Cash Receivables liabilities 
    Canadian dollars$46$2,333$(136,030)
    Indonesian Rupiah 22 - - 
    Norwegian Kroner 6,844 - (1,711)

    Based on the above net exposures as at

          Accounts 
          payable and 
          accrued 
    30 June 2012 Cash Receivables liabilities 
    Canadian dollars$-$2,436$(27,450)
    Indonesian Rupiah 292 - - 

    At June 30, June 2010, and assuming that all2013, with other variables remain constant,unchanged, a +/- 10% depreciation or appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollarchange in exchange rates would result in a decrease/increase of $3,061 in the Company’s net earnings. Likewise, a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the US dollar against the Singapore dollar would result in an increase/decrease of $844 and a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the US dollar against the Indonesian Rupiah would result in a decrease/increase of $926 in the Company’s net earnings.loss by $12,850.

    b)     

    Credit risk

    Credit risk

    Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations.

    The Company’s cash is held by large Canadianreputable financial institutions. Receivables consist of goods and international financial institutions.services taxes due from the Federal Government of Canada. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to receivables is remote.

    c)     

    Liquidity risk

    Liquidity risk

    Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. Liquidity requirements are managed based on expected cash flows to ensure that there ismaintain sufficient capital in order to meet short term obligations. As at June 30, 2010,2013, the Company had a cash balance of $88,843$21,999 (June 30, 20092012 -$591,930)152,971) which is not sufficient to settle current liabilities of $284,787$769,541 (June 30, 20092012 - $69,738)$446,777). Management is currently working on obtaining financing to meet these obligations.





    d)     

    Interest rate risk

    Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value orof future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.The Company has a positive cash balance and its debt bears interest at fixed rates. The Company has no significant concentrations of interest rate risk thatarising from operations.

    e)     

    Commodity price risk

    Commodity price risk is the Company will realize a loss as a resultrisk of a declinepossible future changes in the fair valuecommodity prices. The Company’s ability to raise capital to fund exploration and evaluation activities is subject to risks associated with fluctuations in the market price of cash is limited.

    Price risk

    The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices.natural gas. The Company closely monitors commodity prices to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken.taken by the Company.

    Capital Management

    The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the development of its resourceoil and gas properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure which optimizesfor its projects for the costsbenefits of capital at an acceptable risk.its stakeholders. As the Company is in the exploration stage, its principal source of funds is from the issuance of common shares.

    In the management of capital, the Company includes share capitalthe components of shareholders’ equity as well as cash and receivables.

    The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may attempt to issue new shares, enter into joint venture property arrangements, or acquire or dispose of assets. In order to maximize ongoing development efforts,assets, or adjust the Company does not pay out dividends.amount of cash and short-term investments.





    The Company’s investment policy is to invest its cash in highly liquid short-term interest-bearing investments selected with regardsregard to the expected timing of expenditures from continuing operations.

    The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.requirements and there was no change in the Company’s capital management during the year ended June 30, 2013.

    Additional Disclosure for Venture Issuers without Significant Revenue

    Additional disclosure concerning Continental’s general and administrative expenses and resource propertyexploration and evaluation costs is provided in the Company’s Interim Consolidated Statementstatement of Lossloss and Note 7 - Resource Property Costscomprehensive loss contained in its Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2010.2013.

    Approval
    The Board of Directors of Continental has delegated the responsibility and authority for approving quarterly financial statements and MD&A to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has approved the disclosure contained in this MD&A.

    Additional Information
    Additional information relating to Continental is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

    Claims, Contingencies & Litigation
    Except for any contingencies elsewhere disclosed herein, or in the unaudited and management prepared, interimaudited consolidated financial statements for the Past Quarteryear ended June 30, 2013 published herewith, the Company knows of no material, active or pending claims or legal proceedings against them; nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation that might materially adversely affect the Company or a property interest of the Company.

    CONTINUOUSDISCLOSURE& FILINGS- CANADA

    Additional disclosure is made on a continuous basis through periodic filings of Company financial information, significant events, including all press releases and material change reports and disclosure of new or changed circumstances regarding the Company. Unaudited quarterlyThe financial statements are filed by the Company with the British Columbia Securities Commissions (“BCSC”) for each fiscal quarter. Shareholders and interested parties may obtain





    downloadable copies of mandatory filings made by the Company with Canadian securities regulators on the internet at the “SEDAR” websitewww.sedar.comwhich is the “System for Electronic Document Archiving and Retrieval”, employed by Canadian securities regulatory commissions to enable publicly traded companies to electronically file and archive documents and filings in compliance with applicable laws and securities trading regulations. The Company began filing on SEDAR in 1997. All Company fili ngsfilings made on SEDAR during the Past Quarteryear and up to the date of this filing are incorporated herein by this reference.

    CONTINUOUSDISCLOSURE& FILINGS- USA

    The Company is also a full reporting issuer and filer of US Securities and Exchange Commission (“US-SEC”) filings. US-SEC filings include Form 20F annual reports and audited financial statements. Interim unaudited quarterly financial reports in this format together with press releases and material contracts and changes are filed under Form-6K. The Company has filed electronically on the US-SEC’s EDGAR database commencing with the Company’s Form 20F annual report and audited financial statements since its fiscal year end 2004. See websitewww.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/webusers.htm.Prior to that event the Company filed with the US-SEC in paper form. All Company filings made to US-SEC during the past fiscal year and during the Past Quarter and up to the date of this filing are incorporated herein by this reference.

    FORWARD-LOOKINGINFORMATION

    Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect management'sexpectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but are not limited to, statements with respectto the estimation of reserves and resources, the realization of reserve estimates, thetiming and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, capital expenditures, success ofoil and gas operations, environmental risks, permitting risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, titledisputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage. In certain cases, forward-looking statements canbe identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget","scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", orvariations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could","would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative of these terms orcomparable terminology. By their very nature forward-looking statements involve known and unknownrisks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements ofthe Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressedor implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to actualresults of current exploration activities; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined;future prices of resources; possible variations in resource reserves; accidents, labourdisputes and other risks of the oil and gas industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financingor in the completion of development or construction activities; as well as those factors detailed from timeto time in the Company's interim and annual financial statements which are filed and available for reviewon SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors thatcould cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-lookingstatements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated,estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to beaccurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in suchstatements.Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

    ---o0o---





    CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORPORATION

    (An Exploration Stage Company)

    INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    31 MARCH 2014

    Expressed in U.S. Dollars

    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

    INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The financial statements included herein are management prepared, unaudited, condensed, interim, consolidated financial statements and are hereinafter referred to as the "Interim Financial Statements". These Interim Financial Statements are filed on SEDAR concurrently with Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of the results for the same period, and may be read in conjunction with the MD&A.

    NOTICE OF NO AUDITOR REVIEW

    In accordance with National Instrument 51-102 Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of our Interim Financial Statements, then such statements must be accompanied by a notice indicating that they have not been reviewed by an auditor.

    Neither the accompanying Interim Financial Statements as presented herein nor the accompanying MD&A have been reviewed by our auditors. Both the Interim Financial Statements and the MD&A have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the management of Continental Energy Corporation.





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Interim Financial Statements
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)

    CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFFINANCIALPOSITION

         Audited 
    ASSETS Note31 March 2014 30 June 2013 
    Current      

    Cash

      431,753 21,999 

    Receivables

      3,577 2,333 

    Prepaid expenses and deposits

      10,113 517 
       445,443 24,849 
    Non-current assets      

    Receivable

     468,429 - 

    Investments

     4474,896 862,375 

    Equipment

      5,878 9,403 
           
     $ 994,646 896,627 
    LI ABILITIES      
    Current      

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     8474,977 431,263 

    Loans

     5750,000 - 

    Loan payable to related party

     821,380 27,107 

    Convertible debt

     6351,415 311,171 
       1,597,772 769,541 
    EQUITY DEFICIENCY      
    Share capital 716,131,630 16,100,792 
    Conversion rights reserve  56,966 10,966 
    Share based payment reserve 79,401,487 9,353,635 
    Foreign currency translation reserve  (2,727)- 
    Deficit  (25,949,123)(25,286,872)
    Equity deficiency attributable to      

    Shareholders

      (361,767)178,521 

    Non-controlling interest in affiliate

      (241,359)(51,435)
       (603,126)127,086 
           
     $ 994,646 896,627 

    Nature of Operations and Going Concern(Note1)
    Subsequent Events(Note 10)

    ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD:

    “Richard L. McAdoo”, Director& CEO

    “Robert V. Rudman”, Director& CFO

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    2





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Interim Financial Statements
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)

    CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFLOSS ANDCOMPREHENSIVELOSS

      Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended 
     Note31 March 2014 31 March 2013 31 March 2014 31 March 2013 
    EXPENSES         

    Depreciation

     1,174 2,742 3,525 7,109 

    Financing fees – warrants

     - 154,352 - 154,352 

    Interest and bank charges

    642,573 9,336 110,225 53,535 

    Management and consulting fees

    870,049 70,590 212,429 212,287 

    Office expenses and investor relations

     16,553 5,525 40,034 46,648 

    Professional fees

     15,557 24,162 47,260 72,101 

    Rent, maintenance and utilities

     3,322 8,020 13,428 27,396 

    Share-based payments

    7- 152,880 20,877 152,880 

    Travel and accommodation

     11,428 20,234 23,998 34,357 
    Loss before the undernoted$(160,656)(447,841)(471,776)(760,665)
    Other income (expenses)         

    Interest income

     5 2 14 2 

    Foreign exchange gain (loss)

     3,777 1,389 4,465 (217)

    Gain on sale of equipment

     - - - 13,257 

    Equity income from investment in affiliate

    4(161,682)- (382,258)- 
    Net loss for the Period $$(318,556)(446,450)(849,555)(747,623)
              
    Net loss for the period attributable to:         

    Shareholders of the Company

     (239,332)(446,450)(662,251)(747,623)

    Non-controlling interest

     (79,224)- (187,304)- 

    Currency translation differences

     (4,936)- (5,347)- 
    Comprehensive loss for the period$(323,492)(446,450)(854,902)(747,623)
              
    Net comprehensive loss attributable to:         

    Shareholders of the Company

     (241,849)(446,450)(664,978)(747,623)

    Non-controlling interest

     (81,643)- (189,924)- 
     $(323,492)(446,450)(854,902)(747,623)
              
    Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(0.00)(0.00)(0.01)(0.01)
              
    Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding123,615,381 102,250,659 123,446,038 100,430,618 

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    3





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Interim Financial Statements
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)

    CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFCASHFLOW

      For the Nine For the Nine 
      Months Ended Months Ended 
    Cash Resources Provided By (Used In) PeriodNote31 March 2014 31 March 2013 
    Operating Activities     

    Loss for the period

     (662,251)(747,623)

    Items not affecting cash

         

    Depreciation

     3,525 7,109 

    Interest on convertible debt

    6104,057 49,026 

    Interest on related party loan

    8834 458 

    Gain on sale of equipment

     - (13,257)

    Financing fee – warrants

     - 154,352 

    Equity income from investment in affiliates

     194,954 - 

    Share-based payments

    720,877 152,880 

    Write-off of exploration and evaluation assets

     - 1 

    Changes in non-cash working capital

         

    Receivables

     (1,244)(1,914)

    Prepaid expenses and deposits

     (9,596)8,419 

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     (24,673)211,988 
     $(373,517)(178,561)
    Investing Activities     

    Purchase of equipment

     - (5,243)

    Sale of equipment

     - 13,943 
     $- 8,700 
    Financing Activities     

    Shares issued – cash

     40,000 29,500 

    Proceeds from loans

    5750,000 - 

    Repayment of related party loan

    8(6,561)(930)

    Interest paid

     - (6,776)
     $783,439 21,794 
          
    Change in Cash 409,922 (148,067)
    Foreign currency adjustment (168)- 

    Cash Position – Beginning of Period

     21,999 152,971 

    Cash Position – End of Period

    $431,753 4,904 

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    4





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Interim Financial Statements
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)

    CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFCHANGES INEQUITYDEFICIENCY

              Foreign        
          Share Based Conversion Currency    non-   
          Payment Rights Translation    controlling   
      Common Share Capital Reserve Reserve Reserve Deficit  Interest Total 
     NoteNumber Amount $ $ $ $ $  $ $ 
    Balance on 30 June 2012 99,540,381 15,142,030 9,268,928 8,966 - (24,568,557) - (148,633)
    Issuance of shares for:                  

    Private placements - cash

     2,975,000 30,435 29,065 - - -  - 59,500 

    Financing fees – warrants

     - - 154,352 - - -  - 154,352 

    Share-based payments

     - - 152,880 - - -  - 152,880 
    Loss for the period - - - - - (747,623) - (747,623)
    Balance on 31 March 2013 102,515,381 15,172,465 9,605,225 8,966 - (25,316,180) - (529,524)
                       
    Balance on 30 June 2013 122,815,381 16,100,792 9,353,635 10,966   (25,286,872) (51,435)127,086 
    Issuance of shares for:                  

    Private placements - cash

    7800,000 30,838 9,162 - - -  - 40,000 

    Convertible debt amendments

    6- - 17,813 46,000 - -  - 63,813 

    Share-based payments

    7- - 20,877 - - -  - 20,877 
    Foreign currency translation - - - - (2,727)-  (2,620)(5,347)
    Loss for the Period - - - - - (662,251) (187,304)(849,555)
    Balance on 31 March 2014 123,615,381 16,131,630 9,401,487 56,966 (2,727)(25,949,123) (241,359)(603,126)

    - See Accompanying Notes -

    5





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    NOTES TO THEINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)
    31 MARCH2014

    1.Nature of Operations and Going Concern

    Continental Energy Corporation (the “Company”) is incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Company’s registered address and records office is 900-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3H1.

    The Company is an emerging international energy investment company acquiring participating interests in oil, gas, and alternative energy projects, producers, and related services providers outside of North America.

    These Interim Financial Statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations.

    The Company has incurred operating losses over the past several fiscal years and has no current source of operating cash flow. There are no assurances that sufficient funding will be available to further develop its projects. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain the financing necessary to acquire new properties and develop them as well as fund ongoing administration expenses.

    Management intends to obtain additional funding by issuing common stock in private placements. There can be no assurance that management’s future financing actions will be successful. Management is not able to assess the likelihood or timing of improvements in the equity markets for raising capital for future acquisitions or expenditures.

    These uncertainties represent a liquidity risk and impact the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in the future. If the going concern assumption were not appropriate for these Interim Financial Statements, liquidation accounting would apply and adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets, liabilities, the reported income and expenses, and such adjustments could be material.

    2.Basis of Preparation

    These Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) 34, Interim Financial Reporting, and are based on the principles of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and interpretations thereof made by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee.

    These Interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the last fiscal year ended 30 June 2013, which were also prepared in accordance with IFRS.

    The Company’s Board of Directors has delegated the responsibility and authority for approving quarterly financial statements and MD&A to its Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approved these Interim Financial Statements on 8 May 2014.

    3.Critical Judgments and Use of Estimates

    The preparation of these Interim Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS requires that the Company’s management make judgments and estimates and form assumptions that affect the amounts in the financial statements and related notes to those financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Judgments, estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant under the circumstances. Revisions to judgments, estimates and assumptions are accounted for prospectively.

    In preparing these Interim Financial Statements, the significant judgments made by management in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those applied to the audited consolidated financial statements for the last fiscal year ended 30 June 2013.

    6





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    NOTES TO THEINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)
    31 MARCH2014

    4.Investments

    On 4 June 2013, the Company acquired 51% of the shares of Visionaire Energy AS (“Visionaire”), a privately held Norwegian holding company by issuing 20,000,000 of its common shares at a value of $900,000. The principal assets of Visionaire are its shareholdings in two separate, privately owned, offshore oil and gas service providers, both based in Bergen, Norway. Visionaire owns a 49% equity interest in VTT Maritime AS and a 41% equity interest in RADA Engineering and Consulting AS. Visionaire exerts significant management influence over both VTT and RADA and accounts for them using the equity method.

    The Company owns voting control of Visionaire and its accounts are consolidated with those of the Company. The 49% non-controlling interest is recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position. The Company considers Visionaire, VTT, and RADA to be its "affiliates".

    The allocation of the purchase price and the reconciliation of the balance is as follows:

    Fair value of the shares issued 900,000 
    Cash acquired (6,844)
    Payable to related party assumed 1,711 
    Non-controlling interest (69,635)
    Equity income from affiliate 37,143 
    Value of investment on 30 June 2013$862,375 

    The movement in the investment is as follows:

    Value of investment on 30 June 2013 862,375 
    Equity income (loss) from affiliate (382,258)
    Foreign currency translation (5,221)
    Value of investment on 31 March 2014$474,896 

    As at 31 March 2014, a total of $68,429 was receivable from an affiliate. The amount is presented as long-term receivable in the statement of financial position.

    5.Loans

    On 7 November 2013, the Company issued promissory note to a Malaysian company for proceeds of $100,000. The promissory note had a maturity date of 15 May 2014 but was repaid in its entirety on 14 March 2014.

    On 3 March 2014, the Company received proceeds of $750,000 in the form of an interest free loan. The lender has agreed to convert the loan into common shares of the Company at such time as the common shares can be issued (Note 10). As at 31 March 2014, the entire amount remains outstanding.

    7





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    NOTES TO THEINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)
    31 MARCH2014

    6.Convertible Debt

      Total 
        
    Balance on 30 June 2012$269,645 
    Interest 60,245 
    Conversion rights - amendments (2,000)
    Additional consideration warrants - amendment (16,719)
        
    Balance on 30 June 2013$311,171 
    Interest 104,057 
    Conversion rights - amendments (46,000)
    Additional consideration warrants - amendment (17,813)
        
    Balance on 31 March 2014$351,415 

    On 21 September 2011, the Company issued a convertible promissory note for proceeds of $250,000. The note principal was convertible, at the election of the holder, at any time during its term into 3,125,000 common shares of the Company. Any unpaid interest thereupon is also convertible, at the option of the holder, at the same conversion rate. As additional consideration, the Company issued 1,562,500 warrants (“the additional consideration warrants”) to the note holder, exercisable at $0.12 per share up to 22 September 2013, the original maturity date.

    The note originally accumulated interest at a rate of 10% per annum or at 15% per annum in the event of default of payment. On 21 November 2012, the Company reached an agreement with the note holder that increased the interest rate retroactively to 18%, extended the maturity date to 21 March 2013, and reduced the conversion price from $0.08 to $0.05 per share. This amendment to the terms of the note resulted in an incremental value of $1,000.

    On 21 May 2013, the Company reached an agreement with the note holder that extended the maturity date to 21 September 2013, extended the term of the additional consideration warrants to 21 March 2015, and reduced the exercise price of the additional consideration warrants to $0.08.This amendment to the terms of the note resulted in an incremental value of $1,000 and the amendment to the terms of the additional consideration warrants resulted in an incremental value of $16,719.

    On 4 October 2013, the Company reached an agreement with the note holder that extended the maturity date to 15 November 2013. This amendment to the terms of the note resulted in an incremental value of $8,500.

    On 12 December 2013, the Company reached an agreement with the note holder that extended the maturity date to 31 January 2014 and reduced the exercise price of the additional consideration warrants to $0.05. This amendment to the terms of the note resulted in an incremental value of $31,500 and the amendment to the terms of the additional consideration warrants resulted in an incremental value of $10,782.

    On 31 March 2014, the Company reached an agreement with the note holder that extended the maturity date to 30 April 2014 and extended the term of the additional consideration warrants to 31 December 2015. This amendment to the terms of the note resulted in an incremental value of $6,000 and the amendment to the terms of the additional consideration warrants resulted in an incremental value of $7,031.

    The incremental value of the conversion rights of the note and the additional consideration warrants were calculated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:

       Additional 
     Conversion Consideration 
    Fiscal 2013Rights Warrants 
    Expected dividend yieldNil Nil 
    Expected stock price volatility86%86%
    Risk-free interest rate0.11%0.21%
    Expected life (years)0.34 – 1.83 1.83 

    8





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    NOTES TO THEINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)
    31 MARCH2014

       Additional 
     Conversion Consideration 
    Fiscal 2014Rights Warrants 
    Expected dividend yieldNil Nil 
    Expected stock price volatility86%86%
    Risk-free interest rate0.05%0.30%
    Expected life (years)0.09 – 0.14 1.27 – 1.76 

    7.Share Capital

    Authorized Share Capital

    500,000,000 common shares without par value

    500,000,000 preferred shares without par value

    Shares issued

    On 21 October 2013, a private placement was completed for 300,000 units for total proceeds of $15,000. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant has a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The Company allocated $11,215 to common shares and $3,785 to the share purchase warrants based on management’s estimate of relative fair values.

    On 25 July 2013, a private placement was completed for 500,000 units for total proceeds of $25,000. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half share purchase warrant. Each warrant has a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The Company allocated $19,623 to common shares and $5,377 to the share purchase warrants based on management’s estimate of relative fair values.

    Stock options

    The shareholders of the Company approved an incentive stock option plan on 30 November 2012 under which the Board of Directors may, from time to time, grant options to directors, officers, employees or consultants. Options granted must be exercised within a period as determined by the board. Options vest on the grant date unless otherwise determined by the board. The aggregate number of common shares which may be reserved as outstanding options shall not exceed 25,000,000, and the maximum number of options held by any one individual at any one time shall not exceed 7.5% of the total number of the Company's issued and outstanding common shares and 15% of same for all related parties (officers, directors, and insiders) as a group.

    a)Movements in outstanding share options during the period:

        Weighted Average 
      Number of Exercise Price 
      Options $ per Share 
     Outstanding on 30 June 201216,340,000 0.06 

     

    Granted

    7,800,000 0.05 

     

    Expired

    (8,340,000)0.07 
     Outstanding on 30 June 201315,800,000 0.05 

     

    Granted, Expired, Exercised, or Amended

    - - 
     Outstanding on 31 March 201415,800,000 0.05 

    9





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    NOTES TO THEINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)
    31 MARCH2014

    b)Share options outstanding

    A summary of the Company’s options outstanding on 31 March 2014 is as follows, and the total have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.37 years:

     OptionsOptions ExerciseExpiry
     OutstandingExercisable PriceDate
     8,000,0008,000,000 $0.0531 March 2015
     7,800,0007,800,000 $0.0531 December 2015
          
     15,800,00015,800,000   

    Warrants

    a)Movements in warrants during the period:

        Weighted Average 
      Number of Exercise Price 
      Warrants per Share $ 
     Outstanding on 30 June 201220,780,500 0.15 
     

    Issued

    3,125,000 0.05 
     

    Expired

    (12,350,000)0.19 
     Outstanding on 30 June 201311,555,500 0.06 
     

    Issued

    2,550,000 0.06 
     

    Expired

    (2,643,000)0.05 
          
     Warrants outstanding on 31 March 201411,462,500 0.05 

    b)Value of warrants

    On 21 October 2013, a total of 300,000 warrants were granted in conjunction with the Company’s private placement, with an exercise price of $0.10 and a term expiring in three years from the date of the grant. The total value of the warrants was $4,050 which was utilized to allocate $3,785 of the total proceeds of $15,000 to share based payments reserve.

    On 1 October 2013, the Company granted a total of 2,000,000 share purchase warrants as total compensation to two arm’s length parties in exchange for investor relations and other financial services to the Company. Each warrant has a term of one year and an exercise price of $0.05 per common share. The Company calculated the value of these warrants to be $20,877 which was charged to the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as share-based payments.

    On 25 July 2013, a total of 250,000 warrants were granted in conjunction with the Company’s private placement, with an exercise price of $0.10 and a term expiring in three years from date of grant. The total value of the warrants was $13,700 which was utilized to allocate $5,377 of the total proceeds of $25,000 to share based payment reserve.

    The fair value of the warrants granted during the period was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions:

    For the Period ended
    31 March 2014
    Expected dividend yieldNil
    Expected stock price volatility86%
    Risk-free interest rate0.21%
    Expected life of warrants (years)1.43

    10





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    NOTES TO THEINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)
    31 MARCH2014

    c)Warrants outstanding

    A summary of the Company’s warrants outstanding on 31 March 2014, is as follows, and the total have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.30 years:

     Number of Shares Price Per ShareExpiry Date 
          
     2,600,000 $0.057 January 2015 
     375,000 $0.0515 January 2015 
     250,000 $0.0815 March 2015 
     1,562,500 $0.0531 December 2015 
     3,975,000 $0.0531 December 2015 
     150,000 $0.1028 June 2016 
     250,000 $0.1028 July 2016 
     1,500,000 $0.0530 September 2014 
     500,000 $0.0530 September 2014 
     300,000 $0.1021 October 2016 
     11,462,500    

    8.Related Party Transactions

    a)Transactions with related parties and related party balances

    As at 31March2014, $320,734 (30 June 2013 - $260,925)was payable to officers of the Company. This amount is included in accounts payable and is unsecured, non-interest bearing and has no specific terms for repayment.

    As at 31 March2014, there was a loan payable of $21,380 (30 June 2013 - $27,107) to an officer of the Company. The note accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum, is unsecured and was originally due on 21 September 2013, the Company is currently negotiating new terms. During the period ended 31March 2014, interest expense in the amount of $834(31 March 2012 - $458) was accrued. The Company’s net repayment amounted to $6,561 during the nine months ended 31March 2014.

    b)Compensation of key management personnel

    During the three month period ended 31 March 2014 the Company paid or accrued management fees to officers of the Company in the amount of $67,500 (same period ended 31 March 2013 - $67,500).During the first nine months ended 31 March 2014 the Company paid or accrued management fees to officers of the Company in the amount of $202,500 (same nine months ended 31 March 2013 - $202,500).

    During the first nine months ended 31 March 2014, management compensation for share-based payments amounted to $nil (same nine months ended 31 March 2013 - $58,800). The amount represents the expense on 4,000,000 stock options granted to the directors and officers during the period ended 31 March 2013.

    11





    Continental Energy Corporation
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    NOTES TO THEINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS
    (Unaudited – Prepared by Management and expressed in US Dollars)
    31 MARCH2014

    9.Segmented Information

    The Company operates in the business sector of acquiring participating equity interests in oil, gas, and alternative energy projects, producers, and related services providers doing business outside of North America. The Company's assets are segmented on a geographical basis as follows:

      At the End of the At the End of the 
      Past Quarter on Past Fiscal Year on 
    Geographic Segment 31 March 2014 30 June 2013 
    Europe$543,325 862,375 
    Southeast Asia 5,878 9,403 

    Total Non-Current Assets

    $549,203 871,778 

    10.Subsequent Events

    a)     

    On 5 May 2014 the Company made application for revocation of two cease trade orders; one from the Alberta Securities Commission received on 26 March 2014 and one from the British Columbia Securities Commission received on 23 December 2013. These orders were issued due to the Company's late filing of its audited financial reports for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2013 and unaudited reports for the quarters ended 30 September and 31 December 2013. The orders prohibit trading of the Company’s securities in Canada until the deficiency is cured by the Company filing the required financial reports and revocation orders are issued by both Commissions. The Company cured these deficiencies with filings of the late statements on 23 April 2014 and 2 May 2014. As of date of these Interim Financial Statements, the revocation orders have not yet been received.

    ---oOo---

    12





    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
    FORM 51-102F1
    CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORPORATION
    For the Third Quarter Ended 31 March 2014
    of the Fiscal Year Ending 30 June 2014

    This Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) for Continental Energy Corporation (the "Company") has been prepared as of 8 May 2014 (the "Report Date"). This MD&A is intended to supplement and complement the management prepared, unaudited, condensed, interim, consolidated financial statements (the "Interim Financial Statements") filed herewith.

    These Interim Financial Statements and this MD&A pertain to the nine month period ended 31 March 2014, which corresponds to the Third Quarter of the Company's fiscal year ending 30 June 2014. This period is hereinafter referred to as the "Third Quarter" or as the "Past Quarter".

    All financial information presented herein has been prepared in accordance with accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). All amounts disclosed are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.

    NATURE OF BUSINESS

    The Company is an emerging international energy investment company acquiring participating interests in oil, gas, and alternative energy projects, producers, and related services providers outside of North America.

    HIGHLIGHTS OF THE THIRD QUARTER

    Significant events having material effect on the business affairs of the Company which have occurred during the Third Quarter are summarized below:

    SHORTTERMLOAN

    On 3 March 2014, the Company received proceeds of $750,000 in the form of an interest free loan. The lender has agreed to convert the loan into common shares of the Company at such time as the common shares can be issued.

    NOTEREPAID

    On 14 March 2014, the Company repaid a short term promissory note in its entirety. The note had been issued to an arms-length party for proceeds of $100,000 on 7 November 2013.

    ANNUALGENERALMEETINGSCHEDULED

    On 21 March 2014, the Company published and filed on SEDAR, its notice of record date and meeting date for its annual general meeting for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2013. The record date for rights to vote was 17 April 2014. The meeting is set for 23 May 2014 and will be held at the boardroom of the Company's transfer agent in Vancouver.

    CEASETRADEORDERS

    On 26 March 2014, the Alberta Securities Commission issued the Company a cease trade order. The British Columbia Securities Commission had also issued the Company a cease trade order on 23 December 2013. These orders were issued because the Company was at the time deficient in its regulatory requirements involving the filing of its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2013 and its Interim Financial Statements for the quarters ended 30 September 2013 and 31 December 2013. The orders prohibit trading of the Company’s securities in Canada until the deficiency is cured by the Company filing the required financial reports and revocation orders are issued by both Commissions. Subsequent to the end of the Past Quarter, the Company has cured these deficiencies and made application for revocation orders (see Subsequent Events below).

    CONVERTIBLEPROMISSORYNOTE

    On 31 March 2014, the Company and the holder of a $250,000 convertible promissory note agreed to extend the maturity date of the note to 30 April 2014.





    SHAREPURCHASEWARRANTSACTIVITY

    During the Past Quarter, the following activity involving the Company’s share purchase warrants occurred:

    Exercises- No outstanding share purchase warrants were exercised.

    New Issues-No new issues of share purchase warrants were made.

    Expiry- On 26 February 2014, at total of 2,643,000 share purchase warrants expired.

    Amendments- On 31 March 2014, the Company extended the term of 1,562,500 share purchase warrants from 15 May 2015 to 31 December 2015. No change was made to the $0.05 exercise price.

    INCENTIVESTOCKOPTIONSACTIVITY

    During the Past Quarter, the following activity involving the Company’s incentive stock options occurred:

    Exercises- No outstanding incentive stock options were exercised.

    New Grants- No new incentive stock options were granted.

    Expiry- No outstanding incentive stock options expired.

    Amendments- No amendments were made to the terms of any outstanding incentive stock options.

    COMMONSHARECONVERSIONRIGHTSACTIVITY

    During the Past Quarter, the following activity involving the common share conversion rights issued by the Company occurred:

    Exercises- There were no exercises of outstanding common share conversion rights.

    New Issues- There were no new common shares conversion rights issued.

    Expiry- No outstanding common shares conversion rights expired.

    Amendments- There were no amendments to the terms of any outstanding common share conversion rights.

    NEWSHARESISSUES

    During the Past Quarter, no new shares were issued.

    SHAREHOLDING AT END OF THE THIRD QUARTER

    As at the end of the Third Quarter, the Company’s share capital was issued or held in reserve as follows:

    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS TO THE REPORT DATE

    Significant events possibly having material effect on the business affairs of the Company which have occurred since the end of the Third Quarter but prior to the Report Date of this MD&A include the following:

    FILING OFANNUALAUDITEDFINANCIALSTATEMENTS

    On 23 April 2014, the Company published and filed on SEDAR, its audited annual financial statements for its fiscal year ended 30 June 2013.

    FILING OFANNUALSTATEMENT OFRESERVESDATA ANDOTHEROIL ANDGASDISCLOSURE

    On 25 April 2014, the Company published and filed on SEDAR, its annual oil and gas disclosure in the form required by National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities.





    FILING OFINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS FORQ1 FISCAL2014

    On 2 May 2014, the Company published and filed on SEDAR, its Interim Financial Statements for the three month period ended 30 September 2013 and first quarter of its fiscal year ending 30 June 2014.

    FILING OFINTERIMFINANCIALSTATEMENTS FORQ2 FISCAL2014

    On 2 May 2014, the Company published and filed on SEDAR, its Interim Financial Statements for the six month period ended 31 December 2013 and second quarter of its fiscal year ending 30 June 2014.

    DEFICIENCYCURED

    On 2 May 2014, the Company cured the deficiencies pertaining to the cease trade orders, referred to in the Highlights of the Quarter section above, with its 23 April 2014 and 2 May 2014 filings on SEDAR of the required financial statements.

    REVOCATIONAPPLICATION

    On 5 May 2014, the Company made application for revocation of the cease trade orders. As of the Report Date, the revocation orders have not yet been received.

    SHAREPURCHASEWARRANTSACTIVITY

    Exercises- No outstanding share purchase warrants were exercised.

    New Issues- No share purchase warrants were issued.

    Expiry- No share purchase warrants expired.

    Amendments- No amendments were made to the terms of any outstanding share purchase warrants.

    INCENTIVESTOCKOPTIONSACTIVITY

    Exercises- No outstanding incentive stock options were exercised.

    New Grants- No new incentive stock options were granted.

    Expiry- No outstanding incentive stock options expired.

    Amendments- No amendments were made to the terms of any outstanding incentive stock options.

    COMMONSHARECONVERSIONRIGHTSACTIVITY

    Exercises- There were no exercises of outstanding common share conversion rights.

    New Issues- There were no new common shares conversion rights issued.

    Expiry- No outstanding common shares conversion rights expired.

    Amendments- There were no amendments to the terms of any outstanding common share conversion rights.

    NEWSHARESISSUES

    Subsequent to the end of the Past Quarter and prior to the Report Date, no new shares were issued.

    SHAREHOLDING

    As at the Report Date of this MD&A, the Company’s share capital is issued or held in reserve as follows:





    FINANCIAL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

    SUMMARY OFQUARTERLYRESULTS

    The following table sets out selected and unaudited quarterly financial information for the Company for its last eight quarters and is derived from Interim Financial Statements prepared by management in accordance with accounting policies consistent with IFRS.

        Basic & Diluted per 
      Income (loss) from Share Income (loss) from 
      Continued Operations & Continued Operations & 
    PeriodRevenue $Net Income (loss) $ Net Income (loss) $ 
          
    Quarter-3 of Fiscal 2014Nil(318,556)(0.00)
    Quarter-2 of Fiscal 2014Nil(341,133)(0.00)
    Quarter-1 of Fiscal 2014Nil(189,866)(0.00)
    Quarter-4 of Fiscal 2013Nil47,508 0.00 
    Quarter-3 of Fiscal 2013Nil(446,450)(0.01)
    Quarter-2 of Fiscal 2013Nil(144,702)(0.00)
    Quarter-1 of Fiscal 2013Nil(156,471)(0.00)
    Quarter-4 of Fiscal 2012Nil(208,463)(0.00)

    COMPARATIVERESULTS OFOPERATIONS- CURRENT ANDCOMPARATIVEPERIODS

    Nine month period ended 31 March 2014 (the “Current Period”) and the
    Nine month period ended 31 March 2013 (the “Comparative Period”)

    a)     

    Overall, the Company incurred a loss of $849,555 from operations during the Current Period compared to a loss of $747,623 during the Comparative Period, an increase of $101,932. The increase is primarily due to the Company using equity accounting for the losses of its affiliates which were acquired after the Comparative Period. Total equity loss during the Current Period was $382,258 compared to $nil for the Comparative Period.

    b)     

    Interest expense during the Current Period was $110,225 compared to $53,535 during the Comparative Period, attributable largely to increased interest charges on the Company's convertible debt due to various modifications to its terms made during the Current Period.

    c)     

    Share-based payment expense was $20,877 in the Current Period compared to $152,880 in the Comparative Period due to the calculated value of options granted and warrants issued during the respective periods.

    d)     

    Financing fees during the Current Period were $Nil compared to $154,352 for the Comparative Period due to modification of the terms of outstanding warrants.

    e)     

    The Company incurred a loss per share of $0.01 in both the Current and Comparative Periods.

    f)     

    Cash used in operating activities during the Current Period was $373,517 compared to $178,561 used in the Comparative Period.






    g)     

    Cash used in investing activities during the Current Period was $nil compared to $8,700 during the Comparative Period due to purchase and sale of equipment.

    h)     

    Cash raised from financing activities during the Current Period was $783,439 from private placements and loans compared to $21,794 during the Comparative Period.

    COMPARATIVERESULTS OFOPERATIONS- CURRENT ANDCOMPARATIVEQUARTERS

    Three month period ended 31 March 2014 (the “Current Quarter”) and the
    Three month period ended 31 March 2013 (the “Comparative Quarter”).

    a)     

    Overall, the Company incurred a loss from operations during the Current Quarter of $318,556 compared to a loss of $446,450 for the Comparative Quarter, a decrease of $127,894. The decrease is attributable to reduced financing fees and share-based payments. Total equity loss during the Current Quarter was $161,682 compared to $nil for the Comparative Quarter.

    b)     

    Interest expense during the Current Quarter was $42,573 compared to $9,336 during the Comparative Quarter. The increase is attributable to increased interest charges on the Company's convertible debt due to various modifications to its terms made during the Current Quarter.

    c)     

    Share-based payment expense was $nil in the Current Quarter compared to $152,880 in the Comparative Quarter due to the calculated value of options granted and warrants issued during the respective quarters.

    d)     

    Financing fees during the Current Quarter were $nil compared to $154,352 for the Comparative Quarter due to modification of the terms of outstanding additional consideration warrants.

    e)     

    The Company incurred a loss per share of $0.00 in both the Current and the Comparative Quarters.

    f)     

    Cash used in operating activities during the Current Quarter was $254,436 compared to $31,391 used in the Comparative Quarter.

    g)     

    Cash used in investing activities during both the Current Quarter and the Comparative Quarter was $nil.

    h)     

    Cash raised from financing activities during the Current Period was $750,000 from a short term loan less the repayment of a $100,000 loan compared to $29,500 from a private placement and $721 in additional loan during the Comparative Quarter.

    LIQUIDITY AT THEEND OF THETHIRDQUARTER

    As at 31 March 2013, the Company’s Interim Financial Statements reflected a working capital deficit of $1,152,329 compared to a working capital deficit of $744,692 at the 30 June 2013 end of the previous fiscal year end.

    CAPITALRESOURCES

    The Company has no significant operations that generate cash flow and its long term financial success is dependent on management’s ability to identify and conclude oil, gas, and alternative energy investments with a likelihood of success. These undertakings can take many years and are subject to factors that are beyond the Company’s control.

    In order to finance the Company’s growth and to cover administrative and overhead expenses, the Company raises money through equity sales and from the exercise of convertible securities. Many factors influence the Company’s ability to raise funds, including the health of the energy and resource markets, the climate for investment, the Company’s track record, and the experience and caliber of its management.

    The Company may not have sufficient funds to meet its administrative and new business development activities over the next twelve months. The Company believes it will be able to raise the necessary capital it requires, but recognizes there will be risks involved that may be beyond its control. The Company is actively sourcing new capital.

    RISKS ANDUNCERTAINTIES

    The Company has no history of profitable operations and is subject to many risks common to such enterprises, including under-capitalization, cash shortages and limitations with respect to personnel, financial and other resources and the lack of revenues. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in achieving a return on shareholders' investment and the likelihood of success must be considered in light of its early stage of operations.

    There is no certainty that the money the Company spends on new business development or that the investments it makes will result in significant revenue growth to the Company. The long-term profitability of the Company's operations will in part be related to the success of its investments and the performance of current and future affiliates, all of whom may be affected by a number of factors that are beyond the control of the Company.





    The Company is very dependent upon the personal efforts and commitment of its existing management. To the extent that management's services would be unavailable for any reason, a disruption to the operations of the Company could result, and other persons would be required to manage and operate the Company.

    SEGMENTINFORMATION

    The Company operates in the business sector of acquiring participating equity interests in oil, gas, and alternative energy projects, producers, and related services providers doing business outside of North America. The Company's assets are segmented on a geographical basis as follows:

      At the End of the At the End of the 
      Past Quarter on Past Fiscal Year on 
    Geographic Segment 31 March 2014 30 June 2013 
          
    Europe 543,325 862,375 
    Southeast Asia 5,878 9,403 

    Total Non-Current Assets

    $549,203 871,778 

    ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE

    OFF-BALANCESHEETARRANGEMENTS

    The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements not already disclosed elsewhere in the MD&A.

    MATERIALCONTRACTS& COMMITMENTS

    During the period, no new material contracts or commitments were undertaken, not elsewhere disclosed herein or in the Interim Financial Statements for the period ended 31 March 2014.

    RELATEDPARTYTRANSACTIONS

    Details of the transactions and balances between the Company and its related parties are disclosed below.

    Transactions with related parties and related party balances

    Compensation of key management personnel

    INVESTORRELATIONS, PUBLICITY ANDPROMOTION

    No material new arrangements, or modifications to existing agreements, were made by the Company for investor relations services, publicity, promotion or advertising agreements which are not otherwise already disclosed above.

    FINANCIALADVICE, NEWBUSINESSCONSULTING, FINDER'SAGREEMENTS, & FUNDRAISING

    No material new arrangements, or modifications to existing agreements, were made by the Company for financial advice, new business consulting, finder's arrangements, or fund raising which are not otherwise already disclosed above.





    CRITICALACCOUNTINGPOLICIES ANDESTIMATES

    The preparation of Interim Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS requires that the Company’s management make judgments and estimates and form assumptions that affect the amounts in the financial statements and related notes to those financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Judgments, estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant under the circumstances. Revisions to judgments, estimates and assumptions are accounted for prospectively.

    In preparing the Company’s Interim Financial Statements, significant judgments may be made by management in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those applied to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2013.

    FINANCIALINSTRUMENTS

    The Company’s financial instruments as at 31 March 2014 consist of cash, receivables, included long-term receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, loan payable to related party and convertible debt. The fair value of these instruments approximates their carrying value. There were no off-balance sheet financial instruments.

    Cash, other than the minor amounts of Indonesian Rupiahs and Norwegian Krone, consist solely of cash deposits with major Canadian banks. The Company does not use derivative or hedging instruments to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates involving the Canadian dollar, Indonesian Rupiah or Norwegian Krone

    CAPITALMANAGEMENT

    The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue new business development and to maintain a flexible capital structure for its projects for the benefits of its stakeholders. The Company's principal source of funds is from the issuance of common shares. In the management of capital, the Company includes the components of shareholders’ equity as well as cash and receivables.

    The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may attempt to issue new shares, enter into joint venture property arrangements, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. The Company’s investment policy is to invest its cash in liquid short-term interest-bearing investments selected with regard to the expected timing of expenditures from continuing operations.

    The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements and there was no change in the Company’s capital management during the period ended 31 March 2014.

    ADDITIONALDISCLOSURE FORVENTUREISSUERS WITHOUTSIGNIFICANTREVENUE

    Additional disclosure concerning the Company’s general and administrative expenses and other business development costs is provided in the Company’s statement of loss and comprehensive loss contained in its Interim Financial Statements for the period ended 31 March 2014.

    CLAIMS, CONTINGENCIES& LITIGATION

    Except for any contingencies elsewhere disclosed herein, or in the Interim Financial Statements for the period ended 31 March 2014 published herewith, the Company knows of no material, active or pending claims or legal proceedings against them; nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation that might materially adversely affect the Company or a property interest of the Company.

    APPROVAL

    The Company’s Board of Directors has delegated the responsibility and authority for approving quarterly financial statements and MD&A to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approved the Interim Financial Statements and MD&A on 8 May 2014.





    CONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE, FILINGS, AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    CONTINUOUSDISCLOSURE& FILINGS- CANADA

    Additional disclosure is made on a continuous basis in accordance with applicable laws and in compliance with securities rules and regulations of the British Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”). This disclosure and filings includes annual audited consolidated financial statements and quarterly unaudited interim financial statement. It also includes press releases, material change reports, and disclosure of new or changed circumstances regarding the Company. Shareholders and interested parties may obtain downloadable copies of these mandatory filings made by the Company on "SEDAR" (the System for Electronic Document Archiving and Retrieval at websitewww.sedar.com). The Company began filing on SEDAR in 1997. All Company filings made on SEDAR during the year and up to the date of this filing are incorporated herein by this reference.

    CONTINUOUSDISCLOSURE& FILINGS- USA

    The Company is also a full reporting issuer and filer with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company is required to file an annual report with the SEC in the format of a Form 20F annual report which includes audited annual consolidated financial statements. The Company files interim unaudited quarterly financial reports, press releases, material change reports, and disclosure of new or changed circumstances regarding the Company on a periodic basis under Form-6K. The Company has filed electronically on the SEC’s EDGAR database (websitewww.sec.gov/edgar)commencing with the Company’s Form 20F at its fiscal year end 2004. Prior to 2004 the Company filed Form 20F annual reports with the SEC in paper form. All Company filings made to US-SEC during the past fiscal year and during the Past Quarter and up to the date of this filing are incorporated herein by this reference.

    FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

    Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect management's expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the estimation of reserves and resources, projections of anticipated revenue, the realization of reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, cost, capital requirements, success of resource exploration operations, environmental risks, permitting risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage.

    In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "projections", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative of these terms or comparable terminology.

    By their very nature forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to actual results of exploration or new project development activities; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; cash flow projections; future prices of resources; possible variations in resource reserves; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the oil, gas, and alternative energy industries; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities; as well as other factors detailed from time to time in the Company's financial statements and other filings.

    Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

    ---o0o---