UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 20-F

 

 

(Mark One)

 

¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112013

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period fromto

For the transition period fromto

OR

 

¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number: 1-10888

 

 

TOTAL S.A.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Republic of France

(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

2, place Jean Millier

La Défense 6

92400 Courbevoie

France

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Patrick de La Chevardière

Chief Financial Officer

TOTAL S.A.

2, place Jean Millier

La Défense 6

92400 Courbevoie

France

Tel: +33 (0)1 47 44 45 46

Fax: +33 (0)1 47 44 49 44

(Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

 

 

 

Title of each class

  

Name of each exchange on which registered

Shares

American Depositary Shares

  

New York Stock Exchange*

American Depositary SharesNew York Stock Exchange

 

*Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

2,363,767,3132,377,678,160 Shares, par value2.50 each, as of December 31, 20112013

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).**

Yes  ¨    No  ¨

** This requirement is not currently applicable to the registrant.

**This requirement is not currently applicable to the registrant.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  þ Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP  ¨

 

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board  þ

  Other  ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.    Item 17Item17  ¨    Item 18   ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   Page 

CERTAIN TERMS

   iiii  

ABBREVIATIONS

   ivii  

CONVERSION TABLE

   viii  

Item 1.

  

Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

   1  

Item 2.

  

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

   1  

Item 3.

  

Key Information

   1  
  

Selected Financial Data

   1  
  

Exchange Rate Information

   32  
  

Risk Factors

   42  

Item 4.

  

Information on the Company

   109  
  

History and Development

   109  
  

Business Overview

   119  
  

Other Matters

   5446  

Item 4A.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   6578  

Item 5.

  

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

   6578  

Item 6.

  

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

   8191  
  

Directors and Senior Management

   8191  
  

Compensation

   9299  
  

Corporate Governance

   112118  
  

Employees and Share Ownership

   121128  

Item 7.

  

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

   124132  

Item 8.

  

Financial Information

   126134  

Item 9.

  

The Offer and Listing

   132137  

Item 10.

  

Additional Information

   133138  

Item 11.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   146151  

Item 12.

  

Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

   147152  

Item 13.

  

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

   148152  

Item 14.

  

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

   148152  

Item 15.

  

Controls and Procedures

   148152  

Item 16A.

  

Audit Committee Financial Expert

   149153  

Item 16B.

  

Code of Ethics

   149153  

Item 16C.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   149153  

Item 16D.

  

Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

   149154  

Item 16E.

  

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

   150154  

Item 16F.

  

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

   150154  

Item 16G.

  

Corporate Governance

   150154

Item 16H.

Mine Safety Disclosure

157  

Item 17.

  

Financial Statements

   153157  

Item 18.

  

Financial Statements

   153157  

Item 19.

  

Exhibits

   153157  

i


Basis of Presentationpresentation

Financial information included in this Annual Report is presented according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and IFRS as adopted by the European Union (EU) as of December 31, 2011.2013.

Statements Regarding Competitive Positionregarding competitive position

Unless otherwise indicated, statements made in “Item 4. Information on the Company” referring to TOTAL’s competitive position are based on the Company’s estimates, and in some cases rely on a range of sources, including investment analysts’ reports, independent market studies and TOTAL’s internal assessments of market share based on publicly available information about the financial results and performance of market participants.

Additional Informationinformation

This Annual Report on Form 20-F reports information primarily regarding TOTAL’s business, operations and financial information relating to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.2013. For more recent updates regarding TOTAL, you may inspect any reports, statements or other information TOTAL files with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). All of TOTAL’s SEC filings made after December 31, 2001, are available to the public at the SEC Web sitewebsite at http://www.sec.gov and from certain commercial document retrieval services. See also “Item 10. Additional Information — Documents on Display”.

ii


CERTAIN TERMSCertain terms

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings shown below:

 

“acreage”

The area, expressed in acres, over which TOTAL has interests in exploration or production.

 

“ADRs”

American Depositary Receipts evidencing ADSs.

 

“ADSs”

American Depositary Shares representing the shares of TOTAL S.A.

 

association”/“consortium”/“joint venture”

Terms used to generally describe a project in which two or more entities participate. For the principles and methods of consolidation applicable to different types of joint arrangements according to IFRS, refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

barrels”

Barrels of crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGL)condensates, NGL or bitumen.

 

“Company”

TOTAL S.A.

 

“condensates”

Condensates are a mixture of hydrocarbons that exist in a gaseous phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, exist in a liquid phase at surface temperature and pressure. Condensates are sometimes referred to as C5+.

 

“crude oil”

Crude oil is a mixture of compounds (mainly pentanes and heavier hydrocarbons) that exists in a liquid phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure and remains liquid at atmospheric pressure and ambient temperature. “Crude oil” or “oil” are sometimes used as generic terms to designate crude oil plus natural gas liquids (NGL).condensates plus NGL.

 

“Depositary”

The Bank of New York Mellon.

 

“Depositary Agreement”

The depositary agreement pursuant to which ADSs are issued, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 to the registration statement on Form F-6 (Reg. No. 333-172005) filed with the SEC on February 1, 2011.

 

“Group”

TOTAL S.A. and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The terms TOTAL and Group are used interchangeably.

 

“hydrocracker”

A refinery unit which uses a catalyst and extraordinarily high pressure, in the presence of surplus hydrogen, to shorten molecules.

 

“liquids”

Liquids consist of crude oil, bitumen, condensates and natural gas liquids (NGL).NGL.

 

“LNG”

Liquefied natural gas.

 

“LPG”

Liquefied petroleum gas is a mixture of hydrocarbons, the principal components of which are propane and butane, in a gaseous state at atmospheric pressure, but which is liquefied under moderate pressure and ambient temperaturetemperature. LPG is included in NGL.

 

“NGL”

Natural gas liquids consist(NGL) are a mixture of condensateslight hydrocarbons that exist in the gaseous phase at atmospheric pressure and LPG.are recovered as liquids in gas processing plants; NGL include very light hydrocarbons (ethane, propane and butane).

 

“oil and gas”

Generic term which includes all hydrocarbons (e.g., crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGL),condensates, NGL, bitumen and natural gas).

 

project”

As used in this report, “project” may encompass different meanings, such as properties, agreements, investments, developments, phases, activities or components,

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.i


each of which may also informally be described as a “project”. Such use is for convenience only and is not intended as a precise description of the term “project” as it relates to any specific governmental law or regulation.

proved reserves”

Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations, prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The full definition of “proved reserves” that we are required to follow in presenting such information in our financial results and elsewhere in reports we file with the SEC is found in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (including

iii


as amended by the SEC “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” Release No. 33-8995 of December 31, 2008).

 

“proved developed reserves”

Proved developed oil and gas reserves are proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered (i) through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and (ii) through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well. The full definition of “developed reserves” that we are required to follow in presenting such information in our financial results and elsewhere in reports we file with the SEC is found in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (including as amended by the SEC “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” Release No. 33-8995 of December 31, 2008).

 

“proved undeveloped reserves”

Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. The full definition of “undeveloped reserves” that we are required to follow in presenting such information in our financial results and elsewhere in reports we file with the SEC is found in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (including as amended by the SEC “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” Release No. 33-8995 of December 31, 2008).

 

“steam cracker”

A petrochemical plant that turns naphtha and light hydrocarbons into ethylene, propylene, and other chemical raw materials.

 

“TOTAL”

TOTAL S.A. and its subsidiaries and affiliates. We use such term interchangeably with the term Group. When we refer to the parent holding company alone, we use the term TOTAL S.A. or the Company.

 

“trains”

Facilities for converting, liquefying, storing and off-loading natural gas.

 

“ERMI”

ERMI is an indicator intended to represent the refining margin after variable costs for a theoretical complex refinery located around Rotterdam in Northern Europe that processes a mix of crude oil and other inputs commonly supplied to this region to produce and market the main refined products at prevailing prices in the region.

 

“turnarounds”

Temporary shutdowns of facilities for maintenance, overhaul and upgrading.

ABBREVIATIONSAbbreviations

 

b

  barrel  k  thousand

cf

  cubic feet  M  million

boe

  barrel of oil equivalent  B  billion

t

  metric ton  W  watt

m3

  cubic meter  GWh  gigawatt-hour

/d

  per day  TWh  terawatt-hour

/y

  per year  Wp  watt peak
    Btu  British thermal unit

 

iv

iiTOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


CONVERSION TABLEConversion table

 

1 acre

  = 0.405 hectares  

1 b

  = 42 U.S. gallons  

1 boe

  = 1 b of crude oil  = 5,4475,403 cf of gas in 20112013(a)
    = 5,4785,434 cf of gas in 20102012
    = 5,4905,447 cf of gas in 20092011

1 b/d of crude oil

  = approximately 50 t/y of crude oil  

1 Bm3/y

  = approximately 0.1 Bcf/d  

1 m3

  = 35.3147 cf  

1 kilometer

  = approximately 0.62 miles  

1 ton

  = 1 t  = 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)

1 ton of oil

  = 1 t of oil  = approximately 7.5 b of oil (assuming a specific gravity of 37° API)

1 Mt of LNG

  = approximately 48 Mcf of gas  

1 Mt/y LNG

  = approximately 131 Mcf/d  

 

(a)

Natural gas is converted to barrels of oil equivalent using a ratio of cubic feet of natural gas per one barrel. This ratio is based on the actual average equivalent energy content of TOTAL’s natural gas reserves during the applicable periods, and is subject to change. The tabular conversion rate is applicable to TOTAL’s natural gas reserves on a group-wide basis.

 

v

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.iii


Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statementsstatement concerning forward-looking statements

TOTAL has made certain forward-looking statements in this document and in the documents referred to in, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of the management of TOTAL and on the information currently available to such management. Forward-looking statements include information concerning forecasts, projections, anticipated synergies, and other information concerning possible or assumed future results of TOTAL, and may be preceded by, followed by, or otherwise include the words “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “targets”, “estimates” or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are not assurances of results or values. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. TOTAL’s future results and share value may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values are beyond TOTAL’s ability to control or predict. Except for its ongoing obligations to disclose material information as required by applicable securities laws, TOTAL does not have any intention or obligation to update forward-looking statements after the distribution of this document, even if new information, future events or other circumstances have made them incorrect or misleading.

You should understand that various factors, certain of which are discussed elsewhere in this document and in the documents referred to in, or incorporated by reference into, this document, could affect the future results of TOTAL and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements, including:

 

material adverse changes in general economic conditions or in the markets served by TOTAL, including changes in the prices of oil, natural gas, refined products, petrochemical products and other chemicals;

changes in currency exchange rates and currency devaluations;

the success and the economic efficiency of oil and natural gas exploration, development and production programs, including, without limitation, those that are not controlled and/or operated by TOTAL;

uncertainties about estimates of changes in proven and potential reserves and the capabilities of production facilities;

uncertainties about the ability to control unit costs in exploration, production, refining and marketing (including refining margins) and chemicals;

changes in the current capital expenditure plans of TOTAL;

the ability of TOTAL to realize anticipated cost savings, synergies and operating efficiencies;

the financial resources of competitors;

changes in laws and regulations, including tax and environmental laws and industrial safety regulations;

the quality of future opportunities that may be presented to or pursued by TOTAL;

the ability to generate cash flow or obtain financing to fund growth and the cost of such financing and liquidity conditions in the capital markets generally;

the ability to obtain governmental or regulatory approvals;

the ability to respond to challenges in international markets, including political or economic conditions (including national and international armed conflict) and trade and regulatory matters (including actual or proposed sanctions on companies that conduct business in certain countries);

the ability to complete and integrate appropriate acquisitions, strategic alliances and joint ventures;

changes in the political environment that adversely affect exploration, production licenses and contractual rights or impose minimum drilling obligations, price controls, nationalization or expropriation, and regulation of refining and marketing, chemicals and power generating activities;

the possibility that other unpredictable events such as labor disputes or industrial accidents will adversely affect the business of TOTAL; and

the risk that TOTAL will inadequately hedge the price of crude oil or finished products.

For additional factors, you should read the information set forth under “Item 3. Risk Factors”, “Item 4. Information on the Company — Other Matters”, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”.

 

ivTOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013

vi


Items 1 - 3


ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

 

The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for TOTAL on the basis of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)IASB and IFRS as adopted by the European UnionEU for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Following the application of revised accounting standard IAS 19 effective January 1, 2013, the information for 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 2008 and 2007. The historical consolidated financial statements of TOTAL for these

periods, from whichhas been restated; however, the financial data presented below forimpact on such periods are derived, have been audited byrestated results is not significant (for further information concerning this restatement, see the introduction to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein). Ernst & Young Audit and KPMG S.A., independent registered public accounting firms and the Company’s auditors.auditors, audited the historical consolidated financial statements of TOTAL for these periods from which the financial data presented below for such periods are derived, except for the application of the revised accounting standard IAS 19 for the years ended 2009 and 2010. All such data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

 

(M , except share and per share data) 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 
(M, except share and per share data)(a)  2013 2012   2011   2010   2009 

INCOME STATEMENT DATA

              

Revenues from sales

  166,550    140,476    112,153    160,331    136,824     171,655    182,299     166,550     140,476     112,153  

Net income, Group share

  12,276    10,571    8,447    10,590    13,181     8,440    10,609     12,309     10,597     8,400  

Earnings per share

  5.46    4.73    3.79    4.74    5.84     3.73    4.70     5.48     4.74     3.77  

Fully diluted earnings per share

  5.44    4.71    3.78    4.71    5.80     3.72    4.68     5.45     4.72     3.75  

CASH FLOW STATEMENT DATA

              

Cash flow from operating activities

  19,536    18,493    12,360    18,669    17,686     21,473    22,462     19,536     18,493     12,360  

Total expenditures

  24,541    16,273    13,349    13,640    11,722     25,922    22,943     24,541     16,273     13,349  

BALANCE SHEET DATA

              

Total assets

  164,049    143,718    127,753    118,310    113,541     173,491    171,224     163,705     143,441     127,476  

Non-current financial debt

  22,557    20,783    19,437    16,191    14,876     25,069    22,274     22,557     20,783     19,437  

Non-controlling interests

  1,352    857    987    958    842     2,281    1,280     1,352     857     987  

Shareholders’ equity — Group share

  68,037    60,414    52,552    48,992    44,858     72,629    71,185     66,945     59,648     51,860  

Common shares

  5,909    5,874    5,871    5,930    5,989     5,944    5,915     5,909     5,874     5,871  

DIVIDENDS

              

Dividend per share (euros)

  2.28(a)   2.28    2.28    2.28    2.07     2.38(b)   2.34     2.28     2.28     2.28  

Dividend per share (dollars)

  $3.10(a)(b)   $3.15    $3.08    $3.01    $3.14     $3.16(b)(c)   $3.05     $2.97     $3.15     $3.08  

COMMON SHARES(c)(d)

              

Average number outstanding of common shares2.50 par value (shares undiluted)

  2,247,479,529    2,234,829,043    2,230,599,211    2,234,856,551    2,255,294,231     2,264,349,795    2,255,801,563     2,247,479,529     2,234,829,043     2,230,599,211  

Average number outstanding of common shares2.50 par value (shares diluted)

  2,256,951,403    2,244,494,576    2,237,292,199    2,246,658,542    2,274,384,984     2,271,543,658    2,266,635,745     2,256,951,403     2,244,494,576     2,237,292,199  

 

(a)

Following the application of revised accounting standard IAS 19 effective January 1, 2013, the information for 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 has been restated; however, the impact on such restated results is not significant (for further information concerning this restatement, see the introduction to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein).

(b)

Subject to approval by the shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2012.16, 2014.

(b)(c)

Estimated dividend in dollars includes the first quarterly interim dividend of $0.763$0.80 paid in September 2011October 2013 and the second quarterly interim dividend of $0.742$0.81 paid in December 2011,January 2014, as well as the third quarterly interim dividend of0.570.59 payable in March 20122014 (ADR-related payment in April 2012)2014) and the proposed final dividend of0.570.61 payable in June 20122014 (ADR-related payment in July 2012)June 2014), both converted at a rate of $1.40/$1.30/.

(c)(d)

The number of common shares shown has been used to calculate per share amounts.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.1


Item 3

EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION

 

 

For information regarding the effects of currency fluctuations on TOTAL’s results, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.

Most currency amounts in this Annual Report on Form 20-F are expressed in euros (“euros” or “”) or in U.S. dollars (“dollars” or “$”). For the convenience of the reader, this Annual Report on Form 20-F presents certain translations into dollars of certain euro amounts.

The following table sets out the average dollar/euro exchange rates expressed in dollars per1.00 for the years indicated, based on an average of the daily European Central Bank (“ECB”) reference exchange rate.(1) Such rates are used by TOTAL in preparation of its Consolidated Statement of Income and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow in its Consolidated Financial Statements. No representation is made that the euro could have been converted into dollars at the rates shown or at any other rates for such periods or at such dates.

DOLLAR/EURO EXCHANGE RATES

 

Year  Average Rate   Average Rate 

2007

   1.3705  

2008

   1.4708  

2009

   1.3948     1.3948  

2010

   1.3257     1.3257  

2011

   1.3920     1.3920  

2012

   1.2848  

2013

   1.3281  

The table below shows the high and low dollar/euro exchange rates for the threefour months ended December 31, 2011,2013, and for the first three months of 2012,2014, based on the daily ECB reference exchange rates published during the relevant month expressed in dollars per1.00.

DOLLAR/EURO EXCHANGE RATES

 

Period  High   Low 

October 2011

   1.4160     1.3181  

November 2011

   1.3809     1.3229  

December 2011

   1.3511     1.2889  

January 2012

   1.3176     1.2669  

February 2012

   1.3454     1.2982  

March 2012(a)

   1.3312     1.3057  

Period

  High   Low 

September 2013

   1.3545     1.3117  

October 2013

   1.3805     1.3493  

November 2013

   1.3611     1.3365  

December 2013

   1.3814     1.3536  

January 2014

   1.3687     1.3516  

February 2014

   1.3813     1.3495  

March 2014(a)

   1.3942     1.3732  

 

(a)

Through March 22, 2012.25, 2014.

The ECB reference exchange rate on March 22, 2012,25, 2014, for the dollar against the euro was $1.3167/$1.3789/.

 

 

 

(1)For the period 2007 — 2011, the averages of the ECB reference exchange rates expressed in dollars per1.00 on the last business day of each month during the relevant year are as follows: 2007 — 1.38; 2008 — 1.47; 2009 — 1.40; 2010 — 1.32; and 2011 — 1.40.

RISK FACTORS

 

 

The Group and its businesses are subject to various risks relating to changing competitive, economic, political, legal, social, industry, business and financial conditions. These conditions, along with TOTAL’s approaches to managing certain of these risks, are described below and discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this Annual Report, particularly under the headings “Item 4. Information on the Company — Other Matters”, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”.

A substantial or extended decline in oil or natural gas prices would have a material adverse effect on ourOur operating results and future rate of operations.growth are exposed to the effects of changing commodity prices.

Prices for oil and natural gas historically have fluctuated widely due to many factors over which we haveTOTAL has no control. These factors include:

 

global and regional supply and demand;

global and regional economic and political developments in resource-producing regions, particularly in the Middle East, Africa and South America;

global and regional supply and demand;

the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other producing nations to influence global production levels and prices;

prices of alternative fuelsunconventional energies as well as evolving approaches for developing oil sands, which may affect ourthe Group’s realized prices, notably under ourits long-term gas sales contracts;contracts and asset valuations, notably in North America;

cost and availability of new technology;

governmental regulations and actions;

global economic and financial market conditions;

war or other conflicts;

cost and availability of new technology;

changes in demographics, including population growth rates and consumer preferences; and

adverse weather conditions (such as hurricanes) that can disrupt supplies or interrupt operations of ourthe Group’s facilities.

Substantial or extended declines in oil and natural gas prices would adversely affect ourTOTAL’s results of operations by reducing ourits profits.For the year 2012,2014, we estimate that a decrease of $1.00 per barrel in the average annual price of Brent crude would have the effect of reducing our annual adjusted net operating income from the Upstream segment by approximately0.110.12 billion (calculated with a base case exchange rate of $1.40$1.30 per1.00)1.00 and a Brent price of $100 per barrel). In addition to the adverse effect on revenues, margins and profitability

from any fall in oil and natural gas prices, a prolonged period of low prices or other indicators could lead to reviews for impairmenta review of the Group’s properties and oil and natural gas properties and could impact reserves. Such reviewsreview would reflect management’sthe Company’s view of long-term oilbased on estimates, assumptions and natural gas pricesjudgments and could result in a reduction in the Group’s reported reserves and/or a charge for impairment that could have a significant effect on ourthe Group’s results of operations in the period in which it occurs. Lower oil and natural gas prices over prolonged periods may also reduce the economic viability of projects planned or in development, negatively impact the asset sale program of the Group and reduce liquidity, thereby decreasing the Group’s ability to finance capital expenditures and/or causing usit to cancel or postpone capital expansion projects, and may reduce liquidity, thereby potentially decreasing our ability to finance capital expenditures.investment

(1)

For the period 2009 — 2013, the averages of the ECB reference exchange rates expressed in dollars per1.00 on the last business day of each month during the relevant year are as follows: 2009 — 1.40; 2010 — 1.32; 2011 — 1.40; 2012 —1.29; and 2013 —1.33.

2TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 3 - Risk Factors

projects. If we areTOTAL is unable to follow through with capital expansioninvestment projects, ourthe Group’s opportunities for future revenue and profitability growth would be reduced, which could materially impact ourthe Group’s financial condition.

However, in a high oil and gas price environment, wethe Group can experience sharpsignificant increases in cost and fiscal take, and, under some production-sharing contracts, ourthe Group’s entitlement to reserves could be reduced. Higher prices can also reduce demand for ourthe Group’s products.

The Group’s earnings from its Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments are primarily dependent upon the supply and demand for refined products and the associated margins on refined product sales, with the impact of changes in oil and gas prices on earnings on these segments being dependent upon the speed at which the prices of refined products adjust to reflect movements in oil and gas prices.

Our long-term profitability depends on cost effective discovery, acquisition and development of new reserves; if we are unsuccessful, our results of operations and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

A significant portion of ourthe Group’s revenues and the majority of ourits operating income are derived from the sale of oil and gas which we extractthat the Group extracts from underground reserves developed as part of ourits Upstream business. The development of oil and gas fields, the construction of facilities and the drilling of production or injection wells is capital intensive, requires advanced technology and moreover, due to constantly changing market conditions and difficult environmental challenges, cost projections are uncertain. In order for this Upstream business to continue to be profitable, we needthe Group needs to replace depletedits reserves with new proved reserves. Furthermore, we needthe Group needs to accomplish such replacement in a manner that allows subsequent production to be economically viable. However, ourTOTAL’s ability to discover or acquire and develop new reserves successfully is uncertain and can be negatively affected by a number of factors, including:

 

the geological nature of oil and gas fields, notably unexpected drilling conditions, including pressure or irregularities in geological formations;

the risk of dry holes or failure to find expected commercial quantities of hydrocarbons;

equipment failures, fires, blow-outs or accidents;

ourthe Group’s inability to develop or deploy new technologies that permit access to previously inaccessible fields;

the Group’s inability to anticipate market changes in a timely manner;

adverse weather conditions;

compliance with both anticipated and unanticipated governmental requirements;requirements, including U.S. and EU regulations that may give a competitive advantage to companies not subject to such regulations;

shortages or delays in the availability or delivery of appropriate equipment;

industrial action;

competition from publicly held and state-run oil and gas companies for the acquisition and development of assets and licenses;licenses, as well as from other major international oil companies (see “Item 4. Other Matters — Competition”);

increased taxes and royalties, including retroactive claims; and

problems with legal title.

Any of these factors could lead to cost overruns and impair ourthe Group’s ability to make discoveries and acquisitions or complete a development project, or to make production economical. It is impossible to guarantee that new reserves of oil and gas will be discovered in sufficient quantities to replace the Group’s reserves currently being developed, produced and marketed. Furthermore, some of these factors may also affect the Group’s projects and facilities further down the oil and gas chain. If we failTOTAL fails to develop new reserves cost-effectively on an ongoing basis, ourthe Group’s results of operations, including profits, and ourthe Group’s financial condition, would be materially and adversely affected.

Our oil and gas reservereserves data are only estimates, and subsequent downward adjustments are possible. If actual production from such reserves is lower than current estimates indicate, our results of operations and financial condition would be negatively impacted.

OurThe proved reserves figures of the Group are estimates reflecting applicable reporting regulations as they may evolve.regulations. Proved reserves are those reserves which, by analysis of geosciences and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible — from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations — prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. Reserves are estimated by teams of qualified, experienced and trained geoscientists, petroleum engineers and project engineers, who rigorously review and analyze in detail all available geosciences and engineering data (e.g., seismic, electrical logs, cores, fluids, pressures, flow rates, facilities parameters). This process involves making subjective judgments, including with respect to the estimate of hydrocarbons initially in place, initial production rates and recovery efficiency, based on available geological, technical and economic data. Consequently, estimates of reserves are not exact measurements and are subject to revision. In addition, they may be negatively impacted by a variety of

factors whichthat are beyond ourthe Group’s control and whichthat could cause such estimates to be adjusted downward in the future, or cause ourthe Group’s actual production to be lower than ourits currently reported proved reserves indicate. The main such factors include:

 

a decline in the price of oil or gas, making reserves no longer economically viable to exploit and therefore not classifiable as proved;

an increase in the price of oil or gas, which may reduce the reserves that weto which the Group are entitled to under production sharing and risked service contracts and other contractual terms;

changes in tax rules and other government regulations that make reserves no longer economically viable to exploit; and

the actual production performance of ourthe Group’s reservoirs.

OurThe Group’s reserves estimates may therefore require substantial downward revisions to the extent ourits subjective judgments prove not to have been conservative enough based on the available geosciences and engineering data, or ourthe Group’s assumptions regarding factors or variables that are beyond ourits control prove to be incorrect over time. Any downward adjustment would indicate lower future production amounts, which could adversely affect ourthe Group’s results of operations, including profits as well as ourits financial condition.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.3


Item 3 - Risk Factors

Our production growth depends on the delivery of our major development projects.

The Group’s targeted production growth relies heavily on the successful execution of its major development projects, which are complex and capital-intensive. These major projects are subject to a number of challenges, including:

negotiations with partners, governments, suppliers, customers and others;

cost overruns and delays related to the availability of skilled labor or delays in manufacturing and delivery of critical equipment, or shortages in the availability of such equipment;

unforeseen technical difficulties that could delay project startup or cause unscheduled project downtime;

the actual performance of the reservoir and natural field decline; and

timely issuance or renewal of permits and licenses by government agencies.

Poor delivery of any major project that underpins production or production growth could adversely affect the Group’s financial performance. In addition, many of TOTAL’s projects under developments are larger and more complex than past major projects, which increases the potential execution risk.

Many of our projects are conducted by equity affiliates. This may reduce our degree of control, as well as our ability to identify and manage risks.

A significant and growing number of the Group’s projects are conducted by equity affiliates. In cases where a company in which the Group holds an interest is not the operator, it may have limited influence over, and control of, the behavior, performance and costs of the partnership, its ability to manage risks may be limited and it may, nevertheless, be pursued by regulators or claimants in the event of an incident. Additionally, the partners of the Group may not be able to meet their financial or other obligations to the projects, which may threaten the viability of a given project, and they may not have the financial capacity to fully indemnify the Group in the event of an incident.

We have significant production and reserves located in politically, economically and socially unstable areas, where the likelihood of material disruption of our operations is relatively high.

A significant portion of ourTOTAL’s oil and gas production occursand reserves is located in unstable regions aroundcountries outside of the world, most significantly Africa, but also the Middle East, Asia-PacificOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and South America. Approximately 28%, 24%, 10% and 8%, respectively, of our 2011 combined liquids and gas production came from these four regions.Development (OECD). In recent years, a number of thethese countries in these regions have experienced varying degrees of one or more of the following: economic instability, political volatility, civil war, violent conflict, social unrest and social unrest.actions of terrorist groups. Any of these conditions alone or in combination could disrupt the Group’s operations in any of these regions, causing substantial declines in production. In addition, uncertainties surrounding enforcement of contractual rights in these regions may adversely impact the Group’s results. In Africa, which represented 29% of the Group’s 2013 combined liquids and gas production, certain of the countries in which we havethe Group has production have recently suffered from some of these conditions, including Nigeria, where we had in 2011 our second highest hydrocarbonwhich has been the main contributing country to the Group’s production of hydrocarbons since 2012, and Libya.

The Middle East, in generalwhich represented 23% of the Group’s 2013 combined liquids and gas production, has recently suffered increased political volatility in connection with violent conflict and social unrest. A numberunrest, including Syria, where European Union (EU) and U.S. economic sanctions have prohibited TOTAL from producing oil

and gas since 2011, and Yemen. In South America, which represented 7% of the Group’s 2013 combined liquids and gas production, certain of the countries in South America where wewhich TOTAL has production have production and other facilities,recently suffered from some of the above-mentioned conditions, including Argentina Bolivia and Venezuela, have suffered from political or economic instability and social unrest and related

problems. In Asia-Pacific, Indonesia has suffered some of these conditions. Any of these conditions alone or in combination could disrupt our operations in any of these regions, causing substantial declines in production.Venezuela. Furthermore, in addition to current production, we areTOTAL is also exploring for and developing new reserves in other regions of the world that are historically characterized by political, social and economic instability, such as the Caspian Sea region where we haveTOTAL has large projects currently underway. The occurrence and magnitude of incidents related to economic, social and political instability are unpredictable. It is possible that they could have a material adverse impact on ourthe Group’s production and operations in the future.future and/or cause certain investors to reduce their holdings of TOTAL’s securities.

TOTAL, like other major international energy companies, has a geographically diverse portfolio of reserves and operational sites, which allows it to conduct its business and financial affairs so as to reduce its exposure to political and economic risks. However, there can be no assurance that such events will not have a material adverse impact on the Group.

Our operations throughout emerging countries are subject to intervention by the governments of these countries, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

TOTAL has significant exploration and production activities, and in some cases refining, marketing or chemicals operations, in developing countries whose governmental and regulatory framework is subject to unexpected change and where the enforcement of contractual rights is uncertain. In addition, the Group’s exploration and production activity in such countries is often done in conjunction with state-owned entities, for example as part of a joint venture, where the state has a significant degree of control. In recent years, in various regions globally, TOTAL has seen governments and state-owned enterprises imposing more stringent conditions on companies pursuing exploration and production activities in their respective countries, increasing the costs and uncertainties of the Group’s business operations, which is a trend TOTAL expects to continue. Potential increasing intervention by governments in such countries can take a wide variety of forms, including:

the award or denial of exploration and production interests;

the imposition of specific drilling obligations;

price and/or production quota controls and export limits;

nationalization or expropriation of assets;

unilateral cancellation or modification of license or contract rights;

increases in taxes and royalties, including retroactive claims;

the renegotiation of contracts;

payment delays; and

currency exchange restrictions or currency devaluation.

Imposition of any of these factors by a host government in a developing country where TOTAL has substantial operations, including exploration, could cause the Group to incur material costs or cause the Group’s production or value of the Group’s assets to decrease, potentially having a material adverse effect on its results of operations, including profits.

For example, the Nigerian government has been contemplating new legislation to govern the petroleum industry which, if passed into law, could have an impact on the existing and future activities of the Group in that country through increased taxes and/or costs of operation and could adversely affect financial returns from projects in that country.

4TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 3 - Risk Factors

Ethical misconduct or breaches of applicable laws by our employees could expose us to criminal and civil penalties and be damaging to our reputation and shareholder value.

The Code of Conduct of the Group, which applies to all of its employees, defines the Group’s commitment to integrity, compliance with all applicable legal requirements, high ethical standards and the behaviors and actions the Group expects of the businesses and people of the Group wherever it operates(foradditional information on the Group’s Code of Conduct, see “Item 4. Other Matters — Fair operating practices”). Ethical misconduct or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including non-compliance with anti-bribery and anticorruption laws, by TOTAL, its partners, agents or others that act on the Group’s behalf, could expose TOTAL and its employees to criminal and civil penalties and could be damaging to TOTAL’s reputation and shareholder value. In addition, ethical misconduct or non-compliance with applicable law may lead the competent authorities to impose other measures, such as the appointment of an independent monitor in charge of reviewing the Group’s compliance and internal control procedures and, if need be, recommending improvements of such procedures. Regarding this point, refer to “Item 8. Legal or arbitration proceedings — Iran” for an overview of the settlements between TOTAL, the SEC and the Department of Justice (DoJ) providing for the appointment of an independent monitor, who was appointed in late 2013.

We are exposed to risks regardingrelated to the safety and security of our operations.

TOTAL engages in a broad scope of activities, which include, in particular, drilling, oil and gas production, processing, transportation, refining and petrochemical activities, storage and distribution of petroleum products, specialty chemicals and production of base chemical and specialty products, andsolar energy. These activities involve a wide range of operational risks. Among these risks, are those ofsuch as explosions, fires, accidents, equipment failures, or leakage of toxic products, or emissions or discharges into the air, water or soil, includingand related environmental and health risks. We also face risks, once production is discontinued, because our activities require environmental site remediation. In the transportation area, the type of risk depends not only on the hazardous nature of the products transported, but also on the transportation methods used (mainly pipelines, maritime, river-maritime, rail, road)road and pipelines), the volumes involved and the sensitivity of the regions through which the transport passes (quality of infrastructure, population density, environmental considerations). Most of the Group’s activities will also eventually require environmental site remediation, closure and decommissioning after production is discontinued.

The industrial events that could have the most significant impact are primarily: a major industrial accident (fire, explosion, leakage of highly toxic products); and large-scale accidental pollution or pollution at a particularly sensitive site.

Each of the described risks corresponds to events that could potentially harm human health, cause death, damage property, disrupt business activities or cause environmental damage. The Group’s employees, contractors, residents living near the facilities or customers can suffer injuries. Property damage can involve the facilities of the Group as well as the property of third parties. The seriousness of the consequences of these events varies according to the vulnerability of the people, ecosystems and business activities impacted, on the one hand, and the number of people in the impact area and the location of the ecosystems and business activities in relation to TOTAL’s facilities or to the trajectory of the products after the event, on the other hand.

Acts of terrorism against ourthe Group’s plants and offices,sites, pipelines, transportation orand computer systems could also severely disrupt businessesbusiness and operations and could cause harm to people.people, the environment and property.

Like most industrial groups, TOTAL is impacted by reports of occupational illnesses, particularly those caused by past exposure of the Group’s employees to asbestos. Asbestos exposure has been subject to close monitoring at all of the Group’s business segments. As of December 31, 2013, the Group estimates that the ultimate cost of all pending or future asbestos-related claims is not likely to have a material impact on the Group’s financial position.

Certain branchessegments or activities face specific additional risks. In Exploration & Production, we

TOTAL’s Upstream segment activities face, notably, risks related to the physical characteristics of our oil or gas fields. These include the risks ofinclude eruptions of oil or of gas, discovery of hydrocarbon pockets with abnormal pressure, crumbling of well openings, leaks that can harm the environment and risks of fireexplosions or explosion.fires. These events, which may cause injury, death or death,environmental damage, can also damage or destroy oil or gas wells as well as equipment and other property, lead to a disruption of activitythe Group’s operations or cause environmental damage.reduce its production. In addition, since exploration and production activities may take place on sites that are ecologically sensitive (for example, in tropical forests or in a marine environment), each site requires a

risk-based approach to avoid or minimize the impact on human health, flora and fauna, the ecosystem and biodiversity. In certain situations where TOTALthe operator is not the operator,a Group entity, the Group may have reduced influence and control over third parties, which may limit its ability to manage and control these risks. TOTAL’s

The activities inof the Refining & Chemicals and SupplyMarketing & MarketingServices business segments also entail additional health, safety and environmental risks related to the overall life cycle of the products manufactured, as well as the raw materials used in the manufacturing process, such as catalysts, additives and monomer feedstocks.monomers. These risks can arise from the intrinsic characteristics of the products involved (flammability, toxicity or long-term environmental impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions), their use (including by customers), emissions and discharges resulting from their manufacturing process (such as greenhouse gas emissions), and from recyclingmaterial and waste disposal (recycling, regeneration or disposing of materials and wastes atother process, or waste elimination).

Contracts signed by the end of their useful life.

Contractual termsGroup’s entities may provide for indemnification obligations either by TOTAL in favor of third-partiesthe contractor or third parties or by third-partiesthe contractor or third parties in favor of TOTAL if, for TOTAL’s benefit, if, notably,example, an event occurs leading to death, personal injury death,or property damage or discharge of hazardous materials into the environment. environmental damage.

With respect to joint ventures in which an entity of the Group has an interest and the assets of which are operated by TOTAL,such Group entity under an operating agreement between the joint venture and such entity, contractual terms generally provide that TOTALthe operator assumes full liability for damages caused by its gross negligence or willful misconduct.

With respect to joint ventures in which TOTALan entity of the Group has an interest but thatthe assets of which are operated by others,a third party, contractual terms generally provide that the operator assumes full liability for damages caused by its gross negligence or willful misconduct. All

In the absence of the operator’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, other liabilities of any type ofare generally borne by the joint venture are generallyand the cost thereof is assumed by the partners of the joint venture in proportion to their respective ownership interests.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.5


Item 3 - Risk Factors

With respect to third partythird-party providers of goods and services, the amount and nature of liabilitiesthe liability assumed by the third party depends on the context and may be limited by contract. With respect to their customers, the Group’s customers, TOTAL seeks toentities ensure that itstheir products meet applicable specifications and that TOTAL abidesabide by all applicable consumer protection laws. Failure to do so could lead to personal injury, environmental harm regulatory violations and loss of customers, andwhich could negatively impact ourthe Group’s results of operations, financial conditionposition and reputation.

Crisis management systems are necessary to respond effectively to emergencies and to avoid potential disruptions in our business and operations.

TOTAL has crisis management plans in place to deal with emergencies. However, these plans cannot exclude the risk that the Group’s business and operations may be severely disrupted in a crisis situation or ensure the absence of impacts on third parties or the environment. TOTAL also has implemented business continuity plans in order to continue or resume operations following a shutdown or incident. An inability to restore or replace critical capacity in a timely manner could prolong the impact of any disruption and could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business and operations. For more information on the Group’s crisis management systems, see“Item 4. Other Matters — Management and monitoring of industrial and environmental risks”.

While our insurance coverage is in line with industry practice, we are not insured against all possible risks.

We maintainThe Group maintains insurance to protect usitself against the risk of damage to Group property and/or business disruptioninterruption to ourthe Group’s main refining and petrochemical sites. In addition, wethe Group also maintainmaintains worldwide third-party liability insurance

coverage for all of ourits subsidiaries. OurThe Group’s insurance and risk management policies are described under “Item 4. Other Matters — Insurance and risk management”. While we believe ourTOTAL believes that its insurance coverage is in line with industry practice and sufficient to cover normal risks in our operations, we areits operations. However, the Group is not insured against all possiblepotential risks. In the event of a major environmental disaster, for example, ourTOTAL’s liability may exceed the maximum coverage provided by ourits third-party liability insurance. The loss weTOTAL could suffer in the event of such a disaster would depend on all the facts and circumstances of the event and would be subject to a whole range of uncertainties, including legal uncertainty as to the scope of liability for consequential damages, which may include economic damage not directly connected to the disaster. The Group cannot guarantee that it will not suffer any uninsured loss and there can be no assurance,guarantee, particularly in the case of a major environmental disaster or industrial accident, that such loss would not have a material adverse effect on the Group.

We are subject to stringent environmental, health and safety laws in numerous jurisdictions around the worldcountries and may incur material costs to comply with these laws and regulations.

OurTOTAL’s workforce and the public are exposed to risks inherent to ourthe Group’s operations that potentially could lead to injuries, loss of life, injuries, property damage or environmental damage and could result in regulatory action and legal liability against the entities of the Group and its officers as well as damage to ourthe Group’s reputation.

We incur,TOTAL incurs, and expect towill continue to incur, substantial capital and operating expenditures to comply with increasingly complex laws and regulations covering the protection of the natural environment and the promotion ofaimed at protecting worker health and safety including:and natural habitats.

These expenditures include:

 

costs incurred to prevent, control, eliminate or reduce certain types of air and water emissions, including those costs incurred in connection with government actionmeasures taken to address climate change;

remedial measures related to environmental contamination or accidents at various sites, including those owned by third parties;

compensationindemnification of personsindividuals or entities claiming damages caused by our activitiesaccidents or accidents;by the Group’s activities;

increased production costs and costs related to changes in product specifications; and

costs in connection withrelated to the decommissioning of drilling platforms and other facilities.

If our established financial reserves prove inadequate, environmental costsSuch expenditures incurred could have a material effect on ourthe results of operations of the Group and ourits financial position. position, if the Group’s reserves prove inadequate.

Furthermore, in the countries where we operatethe Group operates or expectplans to operate, in the near future,introduction of new laws and regulations, the

imposition of tougher license requirements, increasingly strictstricter enforcement or newnews interpretations of existing laws and regulations or the discoveryimposition of previously unknown contaminationtougher license requirements may also cause usthe Group’s entities to incur materialhigher costs resulting from actions taken to comply with such laws and regulations, including:

 

modifying operations;

installing pollution control equipment;

implementing additional safety measures; and

performing site clean-ups.

As a further result of, notably, the introduction of any new laws and regulations, or other factors, we maythe Group could also havebe compelled to curtail, modify or cease certain operations or implement temporary shutdowns of facilities, which could diminish ourthe Group’s productivity and materially and adverselyhave a material adverse impact ouron its results of operations, including profits.operations.

All TOTAL entities monitor legal and regulatory developments in order to remain in compliance with local and international rules and standards for the assessment and management of industrial and environmental risks. With regard to the permanent shutdown of an activity, the Group’s environmental contingencies and asset retirement obligations are addressed in the “Asset retirement obligation” and “Provisions for environmental contingencies” sections of the Group’s Consolidated Balance Sheet (see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Future expenditures related to asset retirement obligations are accounted for in accordance with the accounting principles described in Note 1Q to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Regulatory measures designedLaws and regulations related to address climate change and its physical effects attributed to climate change may adversely affect our businesses.

Growing public concernsconcern in the EU and globally that risinga number of countries over greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, may significantly affect the environment and societyas well as a multiplication of stricter regulations in this area, could adversely affect ourthe Group’s businesses includingand product sales, increase its operating costs and reduce its profitability.

More of TOTAL’s future production could come from unconventional sources in order to help meet the world’s growing demand for energy. Since energy intensity of oil and gas production from unconventional sources can be higher than that of production from conventional sources, the CO2 emissions produced by the additionGroup’s activities may increase. Therefore, TOTAL may need to incur additional costs related to certain projects.For information concerning the regulation of stricterCO2 emission allowances in Europe, see “Item 4. Other Matters —

6TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 3 - Risk Factors

Management and monitoring of industrial and environmental risks — Health, safety and environmental regulations that increase our operating costs, affect product sales and reduce profitability. Furthermore, our business operates— European Union — CO2 emission allowances”.

Finally, TOTAL’s businesses operate in varied locales where the potential physical impacts of climate change, including changes in weather patterns, are highly uncertain and may adversely impact the results of ourthe Group’s operations.

Our operations throughout the developing world are subject to intervention by various governments, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We have significant exploration and production, and in some cases refining, marketing or chemicals operations, in developing countries whose governmental and regulatory framework is subject to unexpected change and where the enforcement of contractual rights is uncertain. In addition, our exploration and production activity in such countries is often done in conjunction with state-owned entities, for example as part of a joint venture, where the state has a significant degree of control. In recent years, in various regions globally, we have seen governments and state-owned enterprises exercising greater authority and imposing more stringent conditions on companies pursuing exploration and production activities in their respective countries, increasing the costs and uncertainties of our business operations, which is a trend we expect to

continue. Potential increasing intervention by governments in such countries can take a wide variety of forms, including:

the award or denial of exploration and production interests;

the imposition of specific drilling obligations;

price and/or production quota controls;

nationalization or expropriation of our assets;

unilateral cancellation or modification of our license or contract rights;

increases in taxes and royalties, including retroactive claims;

the establishment of production and export limits;

the renegotiation of contracts;

payment delays; and

currency exchange restrictions or currency devaluation.

Imposition of any of these factors by a host government in a developing country where we have substantial operations, including exploration, could cause us to incur material costs or cause our production to decrease, potentially having a material adverse effect on our results of operations, including profits.

We face foreign exchange risks that could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our businessThe Group faces foreign exchange risks because a large percentage of ourits revenues and cash receipts are denominated in dollars, the international currency of petroleum sales, while a significant portion of ourits operating expenses and income taxes accrue in euros and other currencies. Movements between the dollar and euro or other currencies may adversely affect ourthe Group’s business by negatively impacting ourits booked revenues and income, and may also result in significant translation adjustments that impact ourits shareholders’ equity.

Ethical misconduct or breaches of applicable laws byWe are exposed to trading risks that could adversely affect our employees could expose us to criminal and civil penalties and be damaging to our reputation and shareholder value.business.

Our CodeTOTAL’s trading business is particularly sensitive to market risk and more specifically to price risk as a consequence of Conduct, which appliesthe volatility of oil prices, to allliquidity risk (inability to buy or sell oil cargoes at quoted prices) and to performance risk (counterparty does not fulfill its contractual obligations). The Group uses various instruments such as futures, forwards, swaps and options on organized markets or over-the-counter markets to hedge against fluctuations in the price of our employees, defines our commitmentcrude oil, refined products, natural gas, power, coal, emissions and freight-rates. Although TOTAL believes it has established appropriate risk management procedures, large market fluctuations may adversely affect the Group’s business and results of operations and make it more difficult to integrity, compliance with all applicable legal requirements, high ethical standardsoptimize revenues from the Group’s oil and gas production and to obtain favorable pricing to supply the behaviors and actions we expect of our businesses and people wherever we operate. Ethical misconduct or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including non-compliance with anti-bribery, anticorruption and other applicable laws, could expose TOTAL and our employees to criminal and civil penalties

and could be damaging to our reputation and shareholder value.Group’s refineries.

Disruption of our critical IT services or breaches of information security could adversely affect our operations.

OurThe businesses of the Group depend heavily on the reliability and security of ourits information technology (“IT”) systems. If the integrity of ourthe IT systems were compromised due to, for example, technical failure or cyber attack, ourthe business operations and assets of the Group could sustain serious damage, material intellectual property could be divulged and, in some cases, personal injury, environmental harm and regulatory violations could occur.occur, potentially having a material adverse effect on the Group’s results of operations, including profits.

We have activities in certain countries whichthat are subject to U.S. and EU sanctions and our activities in Iran and Syria could lead totargeted by economic sanctions under relevant U.S. and EU legislation.laws, and if our activities are not conducted in accordance with the relevant conditions, we could be sanctioned or otherwise penalized.

The United States has adopted various laws and the European Union (“EU”) have adopted legal restrictionsregulations designed to restrict trade with respect to certain activities in Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria, and the U.S. Department of State has identified these countries as state sponsors of terrorism. WeThe European Union (“EU”) has similar restrictions with respect to Iran and Syria. A violation of these laws or regulations could result in criminal and material financial penalties, including being prohibited from transacting in U.S. dollars. The Group currently have investmentshas limited marketing and trading

activities in Cuba and a limited presence in Iran and to a lesser extent, SyriaSyria(for moreinformation, see “Item 4. Other Matters — Cuba, Iran and Cuba.Syria”). Since the independence of the Republic of South Sudan on July 9, 2011, TOTAL is no longer present in Sudan.

With respect to Iran, the United States has adopted a number of measures since 1996 that provide for the possible imposition of sanctions against non-U.S. companies engaged in certain activities in and with Iran, including in Iran’s energy sector. The United States first adopted legislation in 1996 implementingauthorizing sanctions against non-U.S. companies doing business in Iran and Libya (the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act, referred to as “ILSA”), which in. In 2006, ILSA was amended to concern only business in Iran (then renamed the Iran Sanctions Act, referred to as “ISA”).

Pursuant to this statute,ISA, which as described below has since been amended and expanded, the President of the United States is authorized to initiate an investigation into the activities of non-U.S. companies in IranIran’s energy sector and to consider the possible imposition of sanctions (from a list that includes denial of financing by the U.S. Export-Import Bank, limitations on the amount of loans or credits available from U.S. financial institutions and prohibition of U.S. federal procurements from sanctioned persons) against persons found, in particular,amongst other activities, to have knowingly made investments of $20 million or more in any 12-month period in the petroleum sector in Iran. In May 1998, the U.S. government waived the application of ISA sanctions for TOTAL’s investment in the South Pars gas field. This waiver, which has not been modified since it was granted, does not address any of TOTAL’s other activities in Iran, although TOTAL has not been notified of any related sanctions.

In November 1996, the Council of the European Union adopted regulations which prohibit TOTAL from complying with any requirement or prohibition based on or resulting

directly or indirectly from certain enumerated legislation, including ILSA (now ISA). It also prohibits TOTAL from having its waiver for South Pars extended to other activities.

Iran. In each of the years sincebetween the passage of ILSA and until 2007, TOTAL made investments in Iran in excess of $20 million (excluding the investments made as part of the development of South Pars). These investments will not be subject to investigation by the U.S. authorities due to the application of the Special Rule granted on September 30, 2010, as further described below. Since 2008, TOTAL’s position has consisted essentially in being reimbursed for its past investments as part of buyback contracts signed between 1995 and 1999 with respect to permits on which the Group is no longer the operator. InSince 2011, TOTAL has had no production in Iran.

ISA was amended in July 2010 by the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act of 2010 (“CISADA”), which expanded both the scopelist of ISAactivities with Iran that could lead to sanctions and restricted the President’s ability to grant waivers.list of sanctions available. In addition to sanctionable investments in Iran’s petroleum sector, parties may now be sanctioned for any transaction exceeding $1 million or series of transactions exceeding $5 million in any 12-month periodparticular, CISADA authorized sanctions for knowingly providing to Iran refined petroleum products above certain monetary thresholds to Iran and for knowingly providing to Iran goods, services, technology, information or support that could directly and significantly either (i) facilitate the maintenance or expansion of Iran’s domestic production of refined petroleum products or (ii) contribute to the enhancement of Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum products. The sanctionsTOTAL had already discontinued potentially sanctionable sales of refined petroleum products to be imposed against violating parties generally prohibit transactions in foreign exchange by the sanctioned party, prohibit any transfers of credit or payments between, by, through or to any financial institution to the extent that such transfers or payments involve any interest of the sanctioned party, and require blocking of any property of the sanctioned party that is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Investments in the petroleum sector commencedIran prior to the adoption of CISADA appear to remain subject to the pre-amended version of ISA. The new sanctions added by CISADA would be available with respect to new investments in the petroleum sector or any other sanctionable activity occurring on or after July 1, 2010. Prior to CISADA’s enactment, TOTAL discontinued prohibited sales under ISA, as amended by CISADA, of refined products to Iran.

enactment. On September 30, 2010, the U.S. State Department announced that the U.S. government, pursuant to the “Special Rule” provision of ISA added by CISADA that allows it to avoid making a determination of sanctionability under ISA with respect to any party that provides certain assurances, would not make such a determination with respect to TOTAL. The U.S. State Department further

indicated at that time that, as long as TOTAL acts in accordance with its commitments, TOTAL will not be regarded as a company of concern for its past Iran-related activities.

Since the applicability of the “Special Rule” to TOTAL was announced by the U.S. State Department, the United States has imposed a number of additional measures targeting activities in Iran. On November 21, 2011, President Obama issued Executive Order 13590, which authorized sanctions that are similar to those available under ISA for knowingly, on or after November 21, 2011, selling, leasing, or providing to Iran goods, services, technology or support that (i) has a fair market value of $1 million or more or that, during a 12-month period, has an aggregate fair market value of $5 million or more, andabove certain monetary thresholds that could directly and significantly contribute to the maintenance

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.7


Item 3 - Risk Factors

or enhancementexpansion of Iran’s ability to develop petroleum resources located in Iran, or (ii) has a fair market value of $250,000 or more or that, during a 12-month period, has an aggregate fair market value of $1 million or more, and that could directly and significantly contribute to the maintenance or expansion of Iran’s domestic production of petrochemical products. TOTAL does not conduct activities in Iran that couldit believes would be sanctionable under Executive Order 13590, and13590. In any event, there is no provision in Executive Order 13590 that modifies the aforementioned “Special Rule”. In addition,, and the U.S. State Department has publishedissued guidance that states the completion of existing contracts is not sanctionable under Executive Order 13590.

On July 30, 2012, President Obama issued Executive Order 13622, which authorized sanctions for, amongst other activities, (i) knowingly, on or after July 30, 2012, engaging in a significant transaction for the purchase or acquisition of petroleum, petroleum products or petrochemical products from Iran, or (ii) materially assisting, sponsoring or providing financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of, the National Iranian Oil Company, the Naftiran Intertrade Company (“NICO”), or the Central Bank of Iran. There is no provision in Executive Order 13622 that modifies the aforementioned “Special Rule”. In addition, Executive Order 13622 contains an exception for the Shah Deniz gas field pipeline project, in which TOTAL (10%) and NICO (10%) participate, to supply natural gas from the Shah Deniz gas field in Azerbaijan to Europe and Turkey. This Executive Order was amended and expanded by Executive Order 13645 (discussed in further detail below), in order to capture as potentially sanctionable conduct a wider range of petroleum-related activities. TOTAL does not conduct activities that it believes would be sanctionable under Executive Order 13622 as amended by Executive Order 13645.

On August 10, 2012, President Obama signed into law the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (“ITRA”), which, amongst other things, amended ISA and CISADA. ITRA, like CISADA before it, expanded both the list of activities with Iran that could lead to sanctions and the list of sanctions available. Amongst other things, ITRA authorized sanctions for (i) the provision to Iran of goods, services, technology, information or support above a certain market value that could directly and significantly facilitate the maintenance or expansion of Iran’s domestic production of refined petroleum products, including any direct and significant assistance with the construction, modernization, or repair of petroleum refineries or infrastructure directly associated with petroleum refineries, (ii) participation in a joint venture established on or after January 1, 2002 with respect to the development of petroleum resources outside of Iran where either the Government of Iran is a substantial partner or investor or where the joint venture could enhance Iran’s ability to develop petroleum resources in Iran, and (iii) owning, operating, controlling or insuring a vessel used to transport crude oil from Iran to another country. ITRA also contains an exception for the Shah Deniz gas field project. TOTAL does not conduct activities that it believes would be sanctionable under ITRA.

ITRA also added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), which requires TOTAL to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates has engaged during the calendar year in certain Iran-related activities, including those targeted under ISA, without regard to whether such activities are sanctionable under ISA, and any transaction or dealing with the Government of Iran that is not conducted pursuant to a specific authorization of the U.S. government(see “Item 4. Other Matters — Iran”). For any annual report that contains responsive Section 13(r) disclosure, an “Iran Notice” is separately filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC must notify the President and U.S. Congress, and the President must initiate an investigation and make a sanctions determination within 180 days after initiating the investigation.

TOTAL believes that its Iran-related activities required to be disclosed by Section 13(r) are not sanctionable, and TOTAL has not been informed that it is at risk of possible imposition of sanctions for activities previously disclosed.

The United States has adopted other sanctions measures, including the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (“NDAA 2012”),which authorizes the imposition of sanctions on foreign financial institutions engaged in certain transactions, the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (“IFCA”), which, amongst other things, authorizes the imposition of sanctions on entities that knowingly provided goods or services to the energy, shipbuilding, and shipping sectors, or to port operations, of Iran, and Executive Order 13645, which, in addition to amending Executive Order 13622 as discussed above, implements certain provisions of IFCA and authorizes additional sanctions against, amongst other things, foreign financial institutions that engage in certain transactions, potentially including those for the sale, supply, or transfer to or from Iran of natural gas, and for the purchase of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran. TOTAL does not conduct activities that it believes would be sanctionable under IFCA, NDAA 2012 or Executive Order 13645.

Also with regard to Iran, France and the EU have adopted measures, based on United Nations Security Council resolutions, which restrict the movement of certain individuals and goods to or from Iran as well as certain financial transactions with Iran, in each case when such individuals, goods or transactions are related to nuclear proliferation and weapons activities or likely to contribute to their development. In July and October 2010, the European UnionEU adopted new restrictive measures regarding Iran. Among other things, the supply of key equipment and technology in the following sectors of the oil and gas industry in Iran are prohibited: refining, liquefied natural gas, exploration and production. The prohibition extends to technical assistance, training and financial assistance in connection with such items. Extension of loans or credit to, acquisition of shares in, entry into joint ventures with or other participation in enterprises in Iran (or Iranian-owned enterprises outside of Iran) engaged in any of the targeted sectors also is prohibited. Moreover, with respect to restrictions on transfers of funds and on financial services, any transfer of at least40,000 or equivalent to or from an Iranian individual or entity shall require a prior authorization of the competent authorities of the EU Member States. TOTAL conducts its activities in compliance with these EU measures.

On January 23, 2012, the Council of the European UnionEU prohibited the purchase, import and transport of Iranian oil

and petroleum and petrochemical products by European persons and by entities constituted under the laws of an EU Member State. Prior to that date, TOTAL had ceased these now-prohibited activities.

TOTAL continues to closely monitor legislative and other developments in France, the EU and the United States in order to determine whether its limited activities in Iran, Syria and other sanctioned or potentially sanctioned jurisdictions could subject it to the application of sanctions. The Group cannot assure that current or future regulations or developments will not have a negative impact on its business or reputation.

With respect to Syria, the EU adopted measures in May 2011 with criminal and financial penalties that prohibit the supply of certain equipment to Syria, as well as certain financial and asset transactions with respect to a list of named individuals and entities. These measures apply to European persons and to entities constituted under the laws of an EU Member State. In September 2011, the EU adopted further measures, including, notably, a prohibition on the purchase, import or transportation from Syria of crude oil and petroleum products. Since early September 2011, the Group ceased to purchase hydrocarbons from Syria. On December 1, 2011, the EU extended sanctions against, among others, three state-owned Syrian oil firms, including General Petroleum Corporation, TOTAL’s co-contracting partner in PSAthe production sharing agreement signed in 1988 (Deir Es Zor licence) and the Tabiyeh contract. The United States also has various

8TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Items 3 - 4

measures regarding Syria. Since early December 2011, the Group has ceased its activities that contribute to oil and gas production in Syria.

TheIn addition, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (referred to as “OFAC”) administers and enforces broad and comprehensive economic sanctions programs, as well as sanctions thatsome of which are based on the United Nations Security Council resolutions referred to above, against targeted foreign countries, territories, entities and that target individuals (including those engaged in activities related to terrorism or the proliferation of weapons proliferation in Iran, usingof mass destruction and other threats to the blockingnational security, foreign policy or economy of assets and trade restrictions.the United States). The activities that are restricted depend on the sanctions program and targeted country or parties, and

civil and/or criminal penalties, imposed on a per transaction basis, can be substantial. These OFAC sanctions generally apply to U.S. persons and activities taking place in the United States or that are otherwise subject to U.S. jurisdiction. Sanctions administered by OFAC target, among others, Cuba, Iran, Myanmar (Burma), Sudan and Syria. TOTAL does not believe that these sanctions are applicable to any of its activities in the OFAC-targeted countries and, since the independence of the Republic of South Sudan on July 9, 2011, TOTAL is no longer present in Sudan.countries.

On December 8, 2011, OFAC amended the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations with the publication of two general licenses that authorize all activities and transactions relating to the petroleum and petrochemical industries in the Republic of South Sudan and related financial transactions, and the transshipment of goods, technology and services through Sudan to or from the Republic of South Sudan and related financial transactions.

In addition,Moreover, many U.S. states have adopted legislation requiring state pension funds to divest themselves of securities in any company with active business operations in Iran, or Sudan, and state contracts not to be awarded to such companies. State insurance regulators have adopted similar initiatives relating to investments

by insurance companies in companies doing business with the Iranian oil and gas, nuclear and defense sectors. CISADA supports these state legislative initiatives. If TOTAL’s operationspresence in Iran were determined to fall within the prohibited scope of these laws, and TOTAL were not to qualify for any available exemptions, certain U.S. institutions holding interests in TOTAL may be required to sell their interests. If significant, sales of securities resulting from such laws and/or regulatory initiatives could have an adverse effect on the prices of TOTAL’s securities.

For more informationTOTAL continues to closely monitor legislative and other developments in France, the EU and the United States, including the Joint Plan of Action recently announced among Iran and the P5+1 countries (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America, as well as Germany) regarding limits on TOTAL’sIran’s nuclear activities and the suspension of certain United States and European Union sanctions regarding Iran, in order to determine whether its limited activities or presence in Cuba, Iran, Sudansanctioned or potentially sanctioned jurisdictions could subject TOTAL to the application of sanctions.

TOTAL is also closely monitoring developments of the situation in Crimea and Syria, see “Item 4. Other Matters — Business Activities in Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria”.any related regulations and/or economic sanctions that could be adopted by the authorities.

TOTAL cannot assure that current or future regulations or developments will not have a negative impact on its business or reputation.

 

 

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT

 

 

TOTAL S.A., a Frenchsociété anonyme (limited company) incorporated in France on March 28, 1924, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, is the fifth largest publicly-traded integrated international oil and gas company in the world(1).

With operations in more than 130 countries, TOTAL has activities in every sector of the oil industry: including in the upstream (oil and gas exploration, development and production, liquefied natural gas) and downstream (refining, petrochemicals, specialty chemicals, marketing and the

(1)Based on market capitalization (in dollars) as of December 31, 2011.

trading and shipping of crude oil and petroleum products)products, marketing). In addition, TOTAL has equity stakes in coal mines and operates in the power generation and renewable energy sectors.

TOTAL began its Upstream operations in the Middle East in 1924. Since that time, the Company has grown and expanded its

operations worldwide. In early 1999, the Company acquired control of PetroFina S.A. (hereafter referred to as “PetroFina” or “Fina”) and, in early 2000, the Company acquired control of Elf Aquitaine S.A. (hereafter referred to as “Elf Aquitaine” or “Elf”).

The Company’s corporate name is TOTAL S.A. Its registered office is 2, place Jean Millier, La Défense 6, 92400 Courbevoie, France. Its telephone number is +33 (0)1 47 44 45 46.

TOTAL S.A. is registered in France at the Nanterre Trade Register under the registration number 542 051 180. The length of the life of the Company is 99 years from March 22, 2000, unless it is dissolved or extended prior to such date.

 

 

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

 

 

TOTAL’s worldwide operations in 20112013 were conducted through three business segments: Upstream, Downstream,Refining & Chemicals and Chemicals.Marketing & Services. The table below gives

information on the

geographic breakdown of TOTAL’s activities and is taken from Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

 

 

(M)  France   Rest of
Europe
   North
America
   Africa   Rest of
world
   Total   France   Rest of
Europe
   North
America
   Africa   Rest of
world
   Total 

2013

            

Non-Group sales(a)

   43,412     96,876     16,815     17,428     15,011     189,542  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   4,533     19,463     14,204     27,444     23,456     89,100  

Capital expenditures

   1,335     4,736     3,130     8,060     8,661     25,922  

2012

            

Non-Group sales(a)

   45,981     103,862     17,648     17,921     14,649     200,061  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   4,560     17,697     15,220     24,999     19,714     82,190  

Capital expenditures

   1,589     4,406     3,148     7,274     6,526     22,943  

2011

                        

Non-Group sales(a)

   42,626     81,453     15,917     15,077     29,620     184,693     42,626     81,453     15,917     15,077     29,620     184,693  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   5,637     15,576     14,518     23,546     17,593     76,870     5,637     15,576     14,518     23,546     17,593     76,870  

Capital expenditures

   1,530     3,802     5,245     5,264     8,700     24,541     1,530     3,802     5,245     5,264     8,700     24,541  

2010

            

Non-Group sales(a)

   36,820     72,636     12,432     12,561     24,820     159,269  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   5,666     14,568     9,584     20,166     13,897     63,881  

Capital expenditures

   1,062     2,629     3,626     4,855     4,101     16,273  

2009

            

Non-Group sales(a)

   32,437     60,140     9,515     9,808     19,427     131,327  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   6,973     15,218     8,112     17,312     11,489     59,104  

Capital expenditures

   1,189     2,502     1,739     4,651     3,268     13,349  

 

(a)

Non-Group sales from continuing operations.

(1)

Based on market capitalization (in dollars) as of December 31, 2013.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.9


Item 4 - Business Overview

UPSTREAMSEGMENT

 

 

TOTAL’s Upstream segment includes the activities of Exploration & Production and Gas & Power divisions.Power. The Group has exploration and production activities in more than fortyfifty countries and produces oil or gas in approximately thirty countries. The Group’s Gas & Power division conducts

activities downstream from production related to natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as well as power generation and trading, and other activities.

Effective July 1, 2012, the Upstream segment no longer includes the activities of New Energies, which are now reported with Marketing & Services. As a result, certain information has been restated according to the new organization.

Exploration & Production

 

 

Exploration and development

TOTAL’s Upstream segment aims at continuing to combine long-term growth and profitability at the level of the best inactors of the industry.

TOTAL evaluates exploration opportunities based on a variety of geological, technical, political, and economic factors (including taxes and license terms), environmental and societal factors, and on projected oil and gas prices. Discoveries of new fields and extensions of existing fields accounted for approximately 76% of the 2,037have brought an additional 2,260 Mboe added to the Upstream segment’s proved reserves during the three-year3-year period ended December 31,

2011 2013 (before deducting production and sales of reserves in place and adding any acquisitions of reserves in place during this period). The remaining 24% comes from revisions of previous estimates. The level of revisions during this three year3-year period wasis close to nil (-11 Mboe) since the positive revisions on a large majority of the fields have been significantly impacted by the effect of successive increaseseffects of the increase of the

reference oil price (from $36.55/b at the end of 2008 to $110.96/$79.02/b in 20112010 to $108.02/b in 2013 for Brent crude) which induced, the variations of the U.S. onshore gas price (from $4.38/MBtu in 2010 to $4.21/MBtu in 2011, $2.85/MBtu in 2012 and $3.67/MBtu in 2013 for Henry Hub) and by a substantial negative revision.perimeter change in four projects.

In 2013, the exploration investments of consolidated subsidiaries amounted to2,809 million (including exploration bonuses included in the unproved property acquisition costs). Exploration investments were made primarily in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Norway, Iraq, French Guiana, Angola, Kenya, Côte d’Ivoire and Mauritania. In 2012, the exploration investments of consolidated subsidiaries amounted to2,634 million (including exploration bonuses included in the unproved property acquisition costs). The main exploration investments were made in Angola, the United Kingdom, the United States, Norway, Iraq, Nigeria, Brazil, Malaysia, the Republic of Congo and French Guiana. In 2011, the exploration investments of consolidated subsidiaries amounted to1,629 million (including exploration bonuses included in the unproved property

acquisition costs). Exploration investments were made primarily notably in Norway, the United Kingdom, Angola, Brazil, Azerbaijan, Indonesia, Brunei, Kenya, French Guiana and Nigeria. In 2010, the exploration

The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production subsidiaries’ development investments of consolidated subsidiaries amounted to1,472 million (including exploration bonuses included16 billion in the unproved property acquisition costs). The main exploration investments were made2013, primarily in Norway, Angola, Norway, Brazil, theAustralia, Nigeria, Canada, United Kingdom, the United States, Indonesia, Nigeria and Brunei. In 2009, exploration investments of consolidated subsidiaries amounted to1,486 million (including exploration bonuses included in the unproved property acquisition costs) notably in the United States, Angola, the United Kingdom, Norway, Libya, Nigeria and the Republic of the Congo.Congo, Gabon, Indonesia, Russia, the United States and Kazakhstan. The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production subsidiaries’ development investments amounted to

14 billion in 2012, primarily in Angola, Norway, Canada, Australia, Nigeria, the United Kingdom, Gabon, Kazakhstan, Indonesia, the Republic of the Congo, the United States and Russia. The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production subsidiaries’ development investments amounted to10 billion in 2011, primarilymostly in Angola, Nigeria, Norway, Kazakhstan, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Gabon, Indonesia, the Republic of the Congo, the United States and Thailand. The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production subsidiaries’ development investments amounted to8 billion in 2010, primarily in Angola, Nigeria, Kazakhstan, Norway, Indonesia, the Republic of the Congo, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Thailand, Gabon and Australia. In 2009, development investments amounted to nearly8 billion, predominantly in Angola, Nigeria, Norway, Kazakhstan, Indonesia, the Republic of the Congo, the United Kingdom, the United States, Gabon, Canada, Thailand, Russia and Qatar.

Reserves

The definitions used for proved, proved developed and proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are in accordance with the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”)(SEC) Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X as amended by the SEC Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting release issued on December 31, 2008. Proved reserves are estimated using geological and engineering data to determine with reasonable certainty whether the crude oil or natural gas in known reservoirs is recoverable under existing regulatory, economic and operating conditions.

TOTAL’s oil and gas reserves are consolidated annually, taking into account, among other factors, levels of production, field reassessments, additional reserves from discoveries and acquisitions, disposal of reserves and other economic factors. Unless otherwise indicated, any reference to TOTAL’s proved reserves, proved developed reserves, proved undeveloped reserves and production reflects the Group’s entire share of such reserves or such production. TOTAL’s worldwide proved reserves include the proved reserves of its consolidated subsidiaries as well as its

proportionate share of the proved reserves of equity affiliates. For further information concerning changes in TOTAL’s proved reserves for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, see “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)”.

The reserves estimation process involves making subjective judgments. Consequently, estimates of reserves are not exact measurements and are subject to revision under well-established control procedures.

The reserves booking process requires, among other things:

 

internal peer reviews of technical evaluations to ensure that the SEC definitions and guidance are followed; and

that management makes significant funding commitments towards the development of the reserves prior to booking.

For further information regarding the preparation of reserves estimates, see “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)”.

Proved reserves for years 2013, 2012 and 2011

In accordance with the amended Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X, proved reserves for the years ended on or afterat December 31, 2009, are calculated using a 12-month average price determined as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month of the relevant year unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions. The reference prices for 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 were, respectively, $110.96/$108.02/b, $79.02/$111.13/b and $59.91/$110.96/b for Brent crude.

As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves of oil and gas were 11 526 Mboe (49% of which were proved developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, condensates, natural gas

10TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 47% of these reserves and natural gas the remaining 53%. These reserves were located in Europe (mainly in Norway and the United Kingdom), in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Nigeria and the Republic of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, Argentina and Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in Australia, Kazakhstan and Russia).

As of December 31, 2012, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves of oil and gas were 11,368 Mboe (51% of which were proved developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, condensates, natural gas liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 50% of these reserves and natural gas the remaining 50%. These reserves were located in Europe (mainly in Norway and the United Kingdom), in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Libya, Nigeria and the Republic of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, Argentina and Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in Australia, Kazakhstan and Russia).

As of December 31, 2011, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves of oil and gas were 11,423 Mboe (53% of which were proved developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, condensates, natural gas liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 51% of these reserves and natural gas the remaining 49%. These reserves were located in Europe (mainly in Italy, Norway and the United Kingdom), in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Libya, Nigeria and the Republic of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, the United States, Argentina and Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in Australia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan and Russia).

As of December 31, 2010, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves of oil and gas were 10,695 Mboe (53% of which were proved developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, natural gas liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 56% of these reserves and natural gas the remaining 44%. These reserves were located in Europe (mainly in Norway

and the United Kingdom), in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Libya, Nigeria and the Republic of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, the United States, Argentina and Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in Indonesia and Kazakhstan).

As of December 31, 2009, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves of oil and gas were 10,483 Mboe (56% of which were proved developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, natural gas liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 54% of these reserves and natural gas the remaining 46%. These reserves were located in Europe (mainly in Norway and the United Kingdom), in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Libya, Nigeria and the Republic of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, the United States, Argentina and Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in Oman, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in Indonesia and Kazakhstan).

Sensitivity to oil and gas prices

Changes in the price used as a reference for the proved reserves estimation result in non-proportionate inverse changes in proved reserves associated with production sharing and risked service contracts (which together represent approximately 26%25% of TOTAL’s reserves as of December 31, 2011)2013). Under such contracts, TOTAL is entitled to a portion of the production, the sale of which is meant to cover expenses incurred by the Group. As oil prices increase, fewer barrels are necessary to cover the same amount of expenses. Moreover, the number of barrels retrievable under these contracts may vary according to criteria such as cumulative production, the rate of return on investment or the income-cumulative expenses ratio. This decrease is partly offset by an extension of the duration over which fields can be produced economically. However, the increase in reserves due to extended field life resulting from higher prices is generally less than the decrease in reserves under production sharing or risked service contracts due to such higher prices. As a result, higher prices lead to a decrease in TOTAL’s reserves.

Furthermore, changes in the price used as a reference for the proved reserves estimation have an impact on the volume of royalties in Canada and thus TOTAL’s share of proved reserves.

Lastly, for any type of contract, a decrease of the reference price of petroleum products may involve a significant reduction of proved reserves.

Production

For the full year 2011,2013, average daily oil and gas production was 2,3462,299 kboe/d compared to 2,3782,300 kboe/d in 2010.

2012 and 2,346 kboe/d in 2011. Liquids accounted for approximately 52%51% and natural gas accounted for approximately 48%49% of TOTAL’s combined liquids and natural gas production in 2011.2013.

The table on the next page sets forth by geographic area TOTAL’s average daily production of liquids and natural gas for each of the last three years.

Consistent with industry practice, TOTAL often holds a percentage interest in its fields rather than a 100% interest, with the balance being held by joint venture partners (which may include other international oil companies, state-owned oil companies or government entities). TOTAL frequently acts as operator (the party responsible for technical production) on acreage in which it holds an interest. See the table “Presentation of production activities by region”geographic area” on the following pages for a description of TOTAL’s producing assets.

As in 20102012 and 2009,2011, substantially all of the liquids production from TOTAL’s Upstream segment in 20112013 was marketed by the Trading & Shipping division of TOTAL’s Downstream segment. See the table “— Business Overview Refining & Chemicals segment (see table“—Trading & Shipping — Trading division’s—Trading’s crude oil sales and supply and sales of crude oil”refined products sales”, below).

The majority of TOTAL’s natural gas production is sold under long-termlong term contracts. However, its North American production, and part of its production from the United Kingdom, Norway and Argentina, is sold on the spot market. The long-term contracts under which TOTAL sells its natural gas usually provide for a price related to, among other factors, average crude oil and other petroleum product prices, as well as, in some cases, a cost-of-living index. Though the price of natural gas tends to fluctuate in line with crude oil prices, a slight delay may occur before changes in crude oil prices are reflected in long-term natural gas prices. Due to the interaction between the contract price of natural gas and crude oil prices, contract prices are not usually affected by short-term market fluctuations in the spot price of natural gas.

Some of TOTAL’s long-term contracts, notably in Argentina, Indonesia, Nigeria, Norway, Qatar and Russia, specify the delivery of quantities of natural gas that may or may not be fixed and determinable. Such delivery commitments vary substantially, both in duration and in scope, from contract to contract throughout the world. For example, in some cases, contracts require delivery of natural gas on an as-needed basis, and, in other cases, contracts call for the delivery of varied amounts of natural gas over different periods of time. Nevertheless, TOTAL estimates the fixed and determinable quantity of gas to be delivered over the period 2012-20142014-2016 to be 4,0513,795 Bcf. The Group expects to satisfy most of these obligations through the production of its proved reserves of natural gas, with, if needed, additional sourcing from spot market purchases. Seepurchases (see “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)”).

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.11


Item 4 - Business Overview

PRODUCTION BY REGION

 

  2011   2010   2009   2013   2012   2011 
  Liquids
kb/d
   Natural
gas
Mcf/d
   Total
kboe/d
   Liquids
kb/d
   Natural
gas
Mcf/d
   Total
kboe/d
   Liquids
kb/d
   Natural
gas
Mcf/d
   Total
kboe/d
   Liquids
kb/d
   Natural
gas
Mcf/d
   Total
kboe/d
   Liquids
kb/d
   Natural
gas
Mcf/d
   Total
kboe/d
   Liquids
kb/d
   Natural
gas
Mcf/d
   Total
kboe/d
 

Africa

   517     715     659     616     712     756     632     599     749     531     699     670     574     705     713     517     715     659  

Algeria

   16     94     33     25     87     41     47     143     74     5     82     21     6     90     23     16     94     33  

Angola

   128     39     135     157     34     163     186     33     191     175     62     186     172     44     179     128     39     135  

Cameroon

   2     1     3     9     2     9     12     2     12                                   2     1     3  

Gabon

   55     17     58     63     20     67     67     20     71     55     16     59     54     19     57     55     17     58  

Libya

   20          20     55          55     60          60     50          50     62          62     20          20  

Nigeria

   179     534     287     192     542     301     159     374     235     158     511     261     173     521     279     179     534     287  

The Congo, Republic of

   117     30     123     115     27     120     101     27     106     88     28     93     107     31     113     117     30     123  

North America

   27     227     67     30     199     65     20     22     24     28     256     73     25     246     69     27     227     67  

Canada(a)

   11          11     10          10     8          8     13          13     12          12     11          11  

United States

   16     227     56     20     199     55     12     22     16     15     256     60     13     246     57     16     227     56  

South America

   71     648     188     76     569     179     80     564     182     54     627     166     59     682     182     71     648     188  

Argentina

   14     397     86     14     381     83     15     364     80     13     366     78     12     394     83     14     397     86  

Bolivia

   3     118     25     3     94     20     3     91     20     4     129     28     3     124     27     3     118     25  

Colombia

   5     27     11     11     34     18     13     45     23                    1     23     6     5     27     11  

Trinidad & Tobago

   4     47     12     3     2     3     5     2     5     2     52     12     4     70     16     4     47     12  

Venezuela

   45     59     54     45     58     55     44     62     54     35     80     48     39     71     50     45     59     54  

Asia-Pacific

   27     1,160     231     28     1,237     248     33     1,228     251     30     1,170     235     27     1,089     221     27     1,160     231  

Australia

        25     4          6     1                         25     4          29     5          25     4  

Brunei

   2     56     13     2     59     14     2     49     12     2     59     13     2     54     12     2     56     13  

China

        46     8          7     1                 

Indonesia

   18     757     158     19     855     178     25     898     190     17     605     131     16     605     132     18     757     158  

Myanmar

        119     15          114     14          103     13          129     16          127     16          119     15  

Thailand

   7     203     41     7     203     41     6     178     36     11     306     63     9     267     55     7     203     41  

CIS

   22     525     119     13     56     23     14     52     24     32     1,046     227     27     909     195     22     525     119  

Azerbaijan

   4     57     14     3     54     13     3     50     12     5     82     20     4     64     16     4     57     14  

Russia

   18     468     105     10     2     10     11     2     12     27     964     207     23     845     179     18     468     105  

Europe

   245     1,453     512     269     1,690     580     295     1,734     613     168     1,231     392     197     1,259     427     245     1,453     512  

France

   5     69     18     5     85     21     5     100     24     1     45     9     2     58     13     5     69     18  

The Netherlands

   1     214     38     1     234     42     1     254     45     1     195     35     1     184     33     1     214     38  

Norway

   172     619     287     183     683     310     199     691     327     136     575     243     159     622     275     172     619     287  

United Kingdom

   67     551     169     80     688     207     90     689     217     30     416     105     35     395     106     67     551     169  

Middle East

   317     1,370     570     308     1,185     527     307     724     438     324     1,155     536     311     990     493     317     1,370     570  

United Arab Emirates

   226     72     240     207     76     222     201     72     214     247     71     260     233     70     246     226     72     240  

Iran

                  2          2     8          8                                               

Iraq

   7     1     7     6          6                 

Oman

   24     62     36     23     55     34     22     56     34     24     66     37     24     61     37     24     62     36  

Qatar

   44     616     155     49     639     164     50     515     141     36     558     137     38     560     139     44     616     155  

Syria

   11     218     53     14     130     39     14     34     20                                   11     218     53  

Yemen

   12     402     86     13     285     66     12     47     21     10     459     95     10     299     65     12     402     86  

Total production

   1,226     6,098     2,346     1,340     5,648     2,378     1,381     4,923     2,281     1,167     6,184     2,299     1,220     5,880     2,300     1,226     6,098     2,346  

Including share of equity affiliates

   316     1,383     571     300     781     444     286     395     359     325     1,955     687     308     1,635     611     316     1,383     571  

Algeria

   10     3     10     19     4     20     20     3     21                                   10     3     10  

Angola

        16     3                                

Colombia

   4          4     7          7     6          6                                   4          4  

Venezuela

   44     7     45     45     6     46     44     6     45     35     7     37     38     7     40     44     7     45  

United Arab Emirates

   219     62     231     199     66     212     191     62     202     240     61     253     225     61     237     219     62     231  

Oman

   22     62     34     22     55     32     22     56     34     23     66     35     23     60     34     22     62     34  

Qatar

   8     382     78     8     367     75     3     221     42     8     385     78     7     364     74     8     382     78  

Russia

   9     465     95                                   19     962     197     15     844     171     9     465     95  

Yemen

        402     74          283     52          47     9          458     84          299     55          402     74  

 

(a)

The Group’s production in Canada consists of bitumen only. All of the Group’s bitumen production is in Canada.

12TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

PRESENTATION OF PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES BY REGION

The table below sets forth, by country, TOTAL’s producing assets, the year in which TOTAL’s activities commenced, the Group’s interest in each asset and whether TOTAL is operator of the asset.

 

TOTAL’s producing assets as of December 31, 20112013(a)    
    Year of
entry into
the country
  

Operated

(Group share in %)

  

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

Africa

         

Algeria

  1952
     Tin Fouye Tabankort (35.00%)

Angola

  1953  

Girassol, Jasmim,

Rosa, Dalia, Pazflor (Block 17) (40.00%)

  Cabinda Block 0 (10.00%)
         

Block 0 (10.00%)

Kuito, BBLT, Tombua-Landana (Block 14) (20.00%)(b)

Oombo (Block 3/91) (50.00%Angola LNG (13.60%)

The Congo, Republic ofGabon

  1928

Kombi-Likalala-Libondo (65.00%)

Moho Bilondo (53.50%)

Nkossa (53.50%)

Nsoko (53.50%)

Sendji (55.25%)

Tchendo (65.00%)

Tchibeli-Litanzi-Loussima (65.00%) Tchibouela (65.00%)

Yanga (55.25%)

Loango (50.00%)

Zatchi (35.00%)

Gabon

1928  

Anguille (100.00%)

Anguille Nord-EstNord Est (100.00%)

Anguille Sud-Est (100.00%)

Atora (40.00%)

Avocette (57.50%)

Ayol Marine (100.00%)

Baliste (50.00%)

Barbier (100.00%)

Baudroie Marine (50.00%)

Baudroie Nord Marine (50.00%)

Coucal (57.50%)

Girelle (100.00%)

Gonelle (100.00%)

Grand Anguille Marine (100.00%)

Grondin (100.00%)

Hylia Marine (75.00%)

Lopez Nord (100.00%)

Mandaros (100.00%)

M’Boukou (57.5%)

M’Boumba (100.00%)

Mérou Sardine Sud (50.00%)

Pageau (100.00%)

Port Gentil Océan (100.00%)

Port Gentil Sud Marine (100.00%)

Tchengue (100.00%)

Torpille (100.00%)

Torpille Nord Est (100.00%)

  
         Rabi Kounga (47.50%)

Libya

  1959     

Zones 15, 16 & 32 (ex C 137, 75.00%(75.00%)(b)(c))

Zones 70 & 87 (ex C 17, 75.00%(75.00%)(b)(c))

Zones 129 & 130 (ex NC 115, 30.00%(30.00%)(b)(c))

Zones 130 & 131 (ex NC 186, 24.00%(24.00%)(b)(c))

Nigeria

  1962  

OML 58 (40.00%)

OML 99 Amenam-Kpono (30.40%)

OML 100 (40.00%)

OML 102 (40.00%)

  OML 102-Ekanga (40.00%)
    

OML 130 (24.00%)

OML 138 (20.00%)

  
         

Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC 10.00%)

OML 118-Bonga118 - Bonga (12.50%)

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.13


Item 4 - Business Overview

TOTAL’s producing assets as of December 31, 2013 (a)
Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

The Congo, Republic of

1928

Kombi-Likalala-Libondo (65.00%)

Moho Bilondo (53.50%)

Nkossa (53.50%)

Nsoko (53.50%)

Sendji (55.25%)

Tchendo (65.00%)

Tchibeli-Litanzi-Loussima (65.00%)

Tchibouela (65.00%)

Yanga (55.25%)

Loango (50.00%)

Zatchi (35.00%)

North America

Canada

1999Surmont (50.00%)

United States

1957Several assets in the Barnett Shale area (25.00%)(d)
Several assets in the Utica Shale area (25.00%)(d)
Chinook (33.33%)
Tahiti (17.00%)

South America

Argentina

1978

Aguada Pichana (27.27%)

Aguada San Roque (24.71%)

Aries (37.50%)

Cañadon Alfa Complex (37.50%)

Carina (37.50%)

Hidra (37.50%)

Kaus (37.50%)

Sierra Chata (2.51%)

Bolivia

1995

San Alberto (15.00%) San Antonio (15.00%)

Itau (41.00%)

Venezuela

1980PetroCedeño (30.323%) Yucal Placer (69.50%)

Asia-Pacific

Australia

2005Various fields in UJV GLNG (27.50%)(e)

Brunei

1986Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam (37.50%)

China

2006South Sulige (49.00%)

Indonesia

1968

Bekapai (50.00%)

Handil (50.00%)

Peciko (50.00%)

Sisi-Nubi (47.90%)

South Mahakam (50.00%)

Tambora (50.00%)

Tunu (50.00%)

Badak (1.05%)

Nilam-gas and condensates (9.29%)

Nilam-oil (10.58%)

Ruby-gas and condensates(15.00%)

Myanmar

1992Yadana (31.24%)

Thailand

1990Bongkot (33.33%)

Commonwealth of Independant States

Azerbaijan

1996Shah Deniz (10.00%)

Kazakhstan

1992Kashagan (16.81%)

Russia

1991Kharyaga (40.00%)
Several fields through the participation in Novatek (16.96%)

Europe

France

1939

Lacq (100.00%)

Lagrave (100.00%)

14TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

    Year of
entry into
the country
  

Operated

(Group share in %)

  

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

North AmericaNorway

  

Canada

1999
Surmont (50.00%)

United States

1957
1965  

Several assets in the Barnett Shale

area (25.00%)(c)

Several assets in the Utica Shale area (25.00%)(c)

Tahiti (17.00%)

South America

Argentina

1978

Aguada Pichana (27.27%Atla (40.00%)

Aries (37.50%)

Cañadon Alfa Complex (37.50%)

Carina (37.50%)

Hidra (37.50%)

San Roque (24.71%)

Sierra Chata (2.51%)

Bolivia

1995

San Alberto (15.00%) San Antonio (15.00%)

Itau (41.00%)

Colombia

1973
Cusiana (11.60%)

Trinidad & Tobago

1996
Angostura (30.00%)

Venezuela

1980
PetroCedeño (30.323%) Yucal Placer (69.50%)

Asia-Pacific

Australia

2005
GLNG (27.50%)

Brunei

1986Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam (37.50%)

Indonesia

1968

Bekapai (50.00%)

Handil (50.00%)

Peciko (50.00%)

Sisi-Nubi (47.90%)

Tambora (50.00%)

Tunu (50.00%Skirne (40.00%)

  
         

Badak (1.05%Åsgard (7.68%)

Nilam-gas and condensates (9.29%Ekofisk (39.90%)

Nilam-oil (10.58%Ekofisk South (39.90%)

Eldfisk (39.90%)

Embla (39.90%)

Gimle (4.90%)

Glitne (21.80%)

Gungne (10.00%)

Heimdal (16.76%)

Huldra (24.33%)

Islay (5.51%)(f)

Kristin (6.00%)

Kvitebjørn (5.00%)

Mikkel (7.65%)

Morvin (6.00%)

Oseberg (14.70%)

Oseberg East (14.70%)

Oseberg South (14.70%)

Sleipner East (10.00%)

Sleipner West (9.41%)

Snøhvit (18.40%)

Stjerne (14.70%)

Tor (48.20%)

Troll I (3.69%)

Troll II (3.69%)

Tune (10.00%)

Tyrihans (23.145%)

Vale (24.24%)

Vilje (24.24%)

Visund (7.70%)

Visund South (7.70%)

Visund North (7.70%)

Yttergryta (24.50%)

Myanmar

1992Yadana (31.24%)

Thailand

1990
Bongkot (33.33%)

Commonwealth of Independent StatesThe Netherlands

  

Azerbaijan

1996
Shah Deniz (10.00%)

Russia

1991Kharyaga (40.00%)
Several fields through the participation in Novatek (14.09%)

Europe1964

France

1939  

Lacq (100.00%F6a gaz (55.66%)

Meillon (100.00%F6a huile (65.68%)

Pécorade (100.00%F15a Jurassic (38.20%)

Vic-Bilh (73.00%F15a/F15d Triassic (32.47%)

Lagrave (100.00%F15d (32.47%)

Lanot (100.00%J3a (30.00%)

Itteville (78.73%K1a (40.10%)

La Croix-Blanche (100.00%K1b/K2a (60.00%)

Vert-le-Grand (90.05%K2c (60.00%)

Vert-le-Petit (100.00%K3b (56.16%)

K3d (56.16%)

K4a (50.00%)

K4b/K5a (36.31%)

K5b (50.00%)

K6/L7 (56.16%)

L1a (60.00%)

L1d (60.00%)

L1e (55.66%)

L1f (55.66%)

L4a (55.66%)

L4d (55.66%)

  
         Dommartin-Lettrée (56.99%

E16a (16.92%)

E17a/E17b (14.10%)

J3b/J6 (25.00%)

Q16a (6.49%)

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.15


Item 4 - Business Overview

   Year of
entry into
the country
 

Operated

(Group share in %)

 

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

Norway

1965Skirne (40.00%)

Åsgard (7.68%)

Ekofisk (39.90%)

Eldfisk (39.90%)

Embla (39.90%)

Gimle (4.90%)

Glitne (21.80%)

Gungne (10.00%)

Heimdal (16.76%)

Huldra (24.33%)

Kristin (6.00%)

Kvitebjørn (5.00%)

Mikkel (7.65%)

Morvin (6.00%)

Oseberg (10.00%)

Oseberg East (10.00%)

Oseberg South (10.00%)

Sleipner East (10.00%)

Sleipner West (9.41%)

Snøhvit (18.40%)

Snorre (6.18%)

Statfjord East (2.80%)

Sygna (2.52%)

Tor (48.20%)

Tordis (5.60%)

Troll I (3.69%)

Troll II (3.69%)

Tune (10.00%)

Tyrihans (23.18%)

Vale (24.24%)

Vigdis (5.60%)

Vilje (24.24%)

Visund (7.70%)

Yttergryta (24.50%)

The Netherlands

1964

F6a gas (55.66%)

F6a oil (65.68%)

F15a Jurassic (38.20%)

F15a/F15d Triassic (32.47%)

F15d (32.47%)

J3a (30.00%)

K1a (40.10%)

K1b/K2a (54.33%)

K2c (54.33%)

K3b (56.16%)

K3d (56.16%)

K4a (50.00%)

K4b/K5a (36.31%)

K5b (45.27%)

K6/L7 (56.16%)

L1a (60.00%)

L1d (60.00%)

L1e (55.66%)

L1f (55.66%)

L4a (55.66%)

E16a (16.92%)

E17a/E17b (14.10%)

J3b/J6 (25.00%)

Q16a (6.49%)

Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)United Kingdom

 

Non-operated1962

(Group share in %)

United Kingdom

1962 

Alwyn North, Dunbar, Forvie North, Ellon, Grant ,Jura Nuggets (100.00%)

Elgin-Franklin, (EFOG 46.17%)(d)

Forvie Nord (100.00%)

Glenelg (49.47%)

Jura (100.00%)

West Franklin (EFOG 46.17%)(d)(g)

Glenelg (49.47%)

Islay (94.49%)(f)

 
      

Alba (12.65%)

Armada (12.53%)

Bruce (43.25%)

Markham unitized fields (7.35%)

ETAP (Mungo, Monan) (12.43%)

Everest (0.87%)

Keith (25.00%)

Maria (28.96%)

Otter (50.00%)

Seymour (25.00%)

Middle East

      

U.A.E.

 1939 Abu Dhabi-Abu Al Bu Khoosh (75.00%) 
      

Abu Dhabi offshore (13.33%)(e)(h)

Abu Dhabi onshore (9.50%)(f)(i)

GASCO (15.00%)

ADGAS (5.00%)

OmanIraq

 19371920
   Halfaya (18.75%)(j)

Oman

1937   

Various fields onshore (Block 6) (4.00%)(g)(k)

Mukhaizna field (Block 53) (2.00%)(h)(l)

Qatar

 1936 Al Khalij (100.00%) 
      

North Field-BlockField-Bloc NF Dolphin (24.50%)

North Field-BlockField-Bloc NFB (20.00%)

North Field-Qatargas 2 Train 5 (16.70%)

SyriaYemen

 1988Deir Ez Zor (Al Mazraa, Atalla North, Jafra, Marad, Qahar, Tabiyeh) (100.00%)(i)1987

Yemen

1987 Kharir/Atuf (Block 10) (28.57%) 
      Various fields onshore (Block 5) (15.00%)

 

(a)

The Group’s interest in the local entity is approximately 100% in all cases except for Total Gabon (58.28%) and certain entities in the United Kingdom, Abu Dhabi and Oman (see notes b through hl below).

(b)

Stake in the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%).

(c)

TOTAL’s stake in the foreign consortium.

(c)(d)

TOTAL’s interest in the joint venture.venture with Chesapeake.

(d)(e)

TOTAL’s interest in the unincorporated joint venture.

(f)

The field of Islay extends partially in Norway. TOTAL hasE&P UK holds a 94.49 % and TOTAL E&P Norge 5.51%.

(g)

TOTAL holds a 46.17% indirect interest in Elgin Franklin through its interest in EFOG.EFOG (company 100% owned by TOTAL).

(e)(h)

Through ADMA (equity affiliate), TOTAL hasholds a 13.33% interest and participates in the operating company, Abu Dhabi Marine Operating Company.

(f)(i)

Through ADPC (equity affiliate), TOTAL hasholds a 9.50% interest and participates in the operating company, Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operation.

(g)(j)

TOTAL has a directholds an interest of 18.75% in the consortium.

(k)

TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 4.00% in Petroleum Development Oman LLC, operator of Block 6, via its 10% interest in which TOTAL has an indirect interest of 4.00% via Pohol (equity affiliate).Pohol. TOTAL also hasholds a 5.54% interest in the Oman LNG facility (trains 1 and 2), and an indirect participation of 2.04% through OLNG in Qalhat LNG (train 3).

(h)(l)

TOTAL hasholds a direct interest of 2.00% in Block 53.

(i)Operated by DEZPC, which is 50% owned by TOTAL and 50% owned by GPC. Following the extension of European Union sanctions against Syria on December 1, 2011, TOTAL has ceased its activities that contribute to oil and gas production in Syria. For further information on U.S. and European restrictions relevant to TOTAL’s activities in Syria, see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk Factors”.

 

Africa

In 2011,2013, TOTAL’s production in Africa was

659 670 kboe/d, representing 28%29% of the Group’s overall production, compared to 756713 kboe/d in 20102012 and

749 659 kboe/d in 2009.2011.

InSouth Africa, TOTAL acquired an interest in the 11B-12B license (50%, operator) in September 2013. This license, which covers an area of 19,000 km2, is located approximately 175 km south of the South African coast in water depths ranging from 200 m to 1,800 m. The drilling of an exploration well is planned for 2014.

In addition, in August 2013, the Group was granted approval by the South African authorities to convert its technical cooperation license for the Outeniqua Block (100%) into an exploration license, subject to the sale by TOTAL of 20% of its stake when the corresponding license agreement will have been negotiated and signed. The Outeniqua Block, which covers approximately 76,000 km2, is located to the southwest of the 11B-12B license in water depths ranging from 400 m to 4,000 m. A 2D seismic campaign of 7,000 km combined with sea bed core drilling activities is expected to be launched.

InAlgeria, TOTAL’s production was 21 kboe/d during 2013, compared to 23 kboe/d in 2012 and 33 kboe/d in 2011. The decline in production between 2011 comparedand 2012 was mainly due to 41 kboe/d in 2010 and 74 kboe/d in 2009.

This decline was due on the one hand to the termination of the Hamra contract in October 2009 and on the other hand to the divestmentsale of TOTAL’s stakeinterest in CEPSA (48.83%), which was finalizedcompleted in July 2011. TheAll of the Group’s production in Algeria now comes entirely from the TFT field (TinTin Fouyé Tabenkort 35%(TFT) field (35%). TOTAL also has stakes of 37.75% and 47% stakes in the Timimoun and Ahnet gas development projects, respectively.

On the TFT field, plateau production was maintained at 170 kboe/d.

 

On the TFT field, plateau production was maintained at 185 kboe/d. A 3D seismic survey covering 1,380 km2on the East and West portionsThe development of the Timimoun field was completedcontinued in October 2011. The data is currently being processed2013 and interpreted.

Launched in 2010 following approval of the development plan by the ALNAFT national agency, the basic engineering phaseresponses for the Timimoun project hasmain calls for tender (plant construction and drilling devices) have been completed.reviewed. In February 2014, the main contract was allocated. Commercial gas production is scheduled tocould start up in 2016,2017, with anticipated plateau production of 1.6 Bm3/yyear (160 Mcf/d). The 3D seismic survey of an area of 2,240 km2, which started in December 2012, was completed in July 2013. The data is currently being analyzed.

 

UnderWithin the framework of the Ahnet project, the technical section of a development plan was submitted to the authorities in July 2011. Discussionsdiscussions are underway withcontinuing between the project partners and the authorities, with regard to bringingparticularly in light of the gas to market, withprovisions of the new 13-02 oil legislation, which provide greater incentives for the development of unconventional hydrocarbons. The anticipated plateau production ofis 4 Bm3/yyear (400 Mcf/d). as of 2018.

InAngola, the Group’s production in 2013 was 186 kboe/d, compared to 179 kboe/d in 2012 and 135 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 163 kboe/d in 2010 and 191 kboe/d in 2009. Production

16TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

comes mainly from Blocks 0, 14 and 17. HighlightsRecent highlights include the launch of the period 2009 toCLOV project in 2010, the start-up of production on Pazflor in 2011, included several discoveries on Blocks 15/06 and 17/06, and, progress onfinally, the major Pazfloracquisition of interests in exploration Blocks 25, 39 and CLOV projects.40 in the Kwanza basin.

 

Deep-offshore Block 17 (40%, operator) is TOTAL’s principal asset in Angola. It is composed of four major zones:hubs: Girassol, Dalia, Pazflor, which are all in production, and CLOV.

On the Girassol hub, production from the Girassol, Jasmim and Rosa fields was 220 kb/d in 2011.

On the Dalia hub, production was nearly 240 kb/d in 2011.

Production onCLOV, which is currently being developed. The Pazflor the third hubproject, consisting of the Perpetua, Zinia, Hortensia and Acacia fields, started uphas achieved plateau production (220 kb/d). The CLOV project, which was launched in August 2011 and reached 170 kb/d at the end of 2011. The production capacity of the FPSO is 220 kb/d.

The development of CLOV, the fourth hub, started in 2010, and will result in the installation of a fourth FPSOFloating Production, Storage and Offloading unit (FPSO) with a production capacity of 160 kb/kbd/d. Start-up of productionProduction start-up is expected in 2014.mid-2014.

On Block 14 (20%), production on the Tombua-Landana field started in August 2009 and adds to production from the Benguela-Belize-Lobito-Tomboco and Kuito fields.

On ultra-deep offshoreultra-deep-offshore Block 32 (30%, operator), appraisal is continuing and pre-developmentthe basic engineering studies for a first production zonethe Kaombo project were completed and the final investment decision is expected to be made in the central/southeasternfirst half of 2014. The project will permit the development of the discoveries made in the southeast portion of the block are underway (Kaombo project).through two FPSOs with a capacity in excess of 100 kb/d each.

On Block 14 (20%(1)), production comes from the Tombua-Landana and Kuito fields as well as the BBLT project, comprising the Benguela, Belize, Lobito and Tomboco fields.

Block 14K (36.75%) corresponds to the offshore unitization zone between Angola (Block 14) and the Republic of Congo (Haute Mer license). The development of the Lianzi field, which was started in 2012, will be achieved by means of a connection to the existing BBLT platform (Block 14). Production start-up is planned for 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized block is held 10% through Angola Block 14 BV and 26.75% through Total E&P Congo.

On Block 0 (10%), the development of Mafumeira Sul was approved by the partners and the authorities in 2012. This project constitutes the second phase of the development of the Mafumeira field. Production start-up is planned for 2016.

On Block 15/06 (15%), the development of a first developmentproduction hub, including the discoveries located onin the northwest portion of the block, has been identified.began in early 2012. In February 2014, TOTAL signed an agreement to sell its entire interest in Block 15/06. The development plan forclosing of this transaction is expected to take place during the hub has been submitted to the authorities.first half of 2014.

TOTAL has operations on exploration Blocks 33 (55%(58.67%, operator), 17/06 (30%, operator), 25 (35%, operator), 39 (15%) and 40 (50%, operator). The Group plans to drill pre-salt targets in Blocks 25, 39 and 40 in 2014 in the deep offshore Kwanza basin. TOTAL signed a disposal agreement to reduce its interest in Block 40 to 40%. The closing of this transaction is expected to take place during the first half of 2014.

TOTAL is also developing inits LNG activities through the Angola LNG project (13.6%), which includes a gas liquefaction plant near Soyo. The plant will beSoyo supplied in particular by the gas associated with production from Blocks 0, 14, 15, 17 and 18. Construction work is ongoing and start-up is expectedLNG production started in 2012.June 2013 but, due to various incidents, the plant has not yet reached full capacity (5.2 Mt/y).

InCameroon, TOTAL no longer holds any exploration or production assets since the Group’s productionsale of its subsidiary Total E&P Cameroun in 2011. Production was 3 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 9 kboe/d in 2010 and 12 kboe/d in 2009. In April 2011, TOTAL finalized the divestment of its stake in its upstream subsidiary Total E&P Cameroon, a Cameroonian company in which the Group had a 75.8% holding. Since that time, the Group no longer owns any exploration and production assets in the country.2011.

InCôte d’Ivoire, TOTAL is operator ofactive in four deep offshore exploration licenses located 50 km to 100 km from the Cl-100 exploration license, with a 60% stake. The 2,000coast and covering approximately 5,200 km2 license is located approximately 100 km southeast of Abidjan inat water depths ranging from 1,5001,000 m to 3,1003,000 m. Exploration work started with a 3D seismic survey of over 1,000 km2 at

TOTAL is the end of 2011, which completed the 3D coverageoperator of the entire block. Initial exploratory drilling is planned forCI-100 (60%) license in the end of 2012.

In February 2012, TOTAL acquired interestsTano basin and holds stakes in three ultra-deepwater exploration licenses :the CI-514 (54%, operator), CI-515 (45%) and CI-516 (45%). For licenses in the two last blocks TOTAL will become the operator upon the first commercial discovery. The work program includes aSan Pedro basin.

A comprehensive 3D seismic survey has been conducted on the CI-100 license and a first exploration well (Ivoire-1X) was drilled in early 2013 in the northwest portion of the block at a water depth of more than 2,300 m. This well has encountered a good-quality oil horizon. The recorded data is currently undergoing analysis in order to assess the potential of the discovered reservoirs and define an exploration and additional works program.

A 3D seismic survey campaign covering the whole acreageof the three licenses CI-514, CI-515 and oneCI-516 was completed in December 2012. The interpretation of the data is ongoing.

Following the drilling of a first exploration well on license CI-514, two more wells are due to be drilled on each blocklicenses CI-515 and CI-516 during the initial three-year exploration period.course of 2014.

InEgypt, TOTAL signed a concession agreement in February 2010 and becameis the operator of Block 4 (East El Burullus Offshore) with aand reduced its stake in this license from 90% stake.to 50% in January 2013. The license, located in the Nile Basin where a number of gas discoveries have been made,river basin, covers a 4-year initial exploration period and includes a commitment to carrying out 3D seismic work and drilling exploration wells. Following the 3D seismic campaign covering 3,374 km2 3D seismic survey shotthat was conducted in 2011, drilling is under preparation.an exploration well (Kala-1) was drilled in late 2013, whose results have been disappointing.

InGabon, the Group’s production in 2013 was 59 kboe/d compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 58 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 67 kboe/d in 2010 and 71 kboe/d in 2009, due to the natural decline of fields.2011. The Group’s exploration and production activities in Gabon are mainly carried out

by Total Gabon(1)(2), one of the Group’s oldest subsidiaries in sub-Saharan Africa.

 

UnderAs part of the Anguille field redevelopment project (estimated production capacity of 20 kboe/d), the AGM NNorth platform, from which twenty-one additional development wells are expected to be drilled, leftwas installed in 2012. Production started as planned with two wells in March 2013.

On the Fos-sur-Mer shipyarddeep-offshore Diaba license, the operator Total Gabon sold off part of its interest in 2012 and now has a stake of 42.5%. An initial exploration well (Diaman-1B) was drilled during 2013 at a water depth of more than 1,700 m. This well revealed an accumulation of gas and condensates in the end of 2011 for Gabon. The drilling campaign is expected to start at the beginningpre-salt reservoirs of the second quarterGamba Formation. Data analysis is currently underway in order to assess this discovery and reassess the surrounding prospects.

The Nguongui-updip well was drilled on the Mutamba-Iroru license (50%) in 2012 and revealed the presence of 2012.

On the deep-offshore Diaba license (Total Gabon 63.75%, operator), following the 2D seismic survey that was performed in 2008 and 2009, a 6,000 km2 3D seismic was shot in 2010. This new seismic survey has been processed and the results are currently being interpreted.

Total Gabon farmed intohydrocarbons. Work is currently being conducted to evaluate the onshore Mutamba-Iroru (50%), DE7 (30%) and Nziembou (20%) exploration licenses in 2010. Following negative exploratory drilling on license DE7, Total Gabon relinquished the license in 2011. Studies are underway to shoot acommercial viability of this discovery. A 2D seismic survey was conducted on the Nziembou license and drill an(20%) in 2012. Drilling preparation activities are being conducted for a first exploration well on the Mutamba licensescheduled in 2012.2014.

InKenya, TOTAL acquired in September 2011 a 40% stake in five offshore licenses in the Lamu Basin:basin in 2011, namely licenses L5, L7, L11a, L11b and L12. This transaction has been approved byL12, representing a total surface area of more than 30,600 km2 at water depths of between 100 m and 3,000 m. Following the Kenyan authorities.3D

InLibya, the Group’s production was 20 kb/d in 2011, compared to 55 kb/d in 2010 and 60 kb/d in 2009. Events in the country forced the entire industry to stop production and freeze development. Depending on the field, production was suspended from late February or early March 2011. The new EPSA IV contracts came into effect in 2010. At that time, the contract zones in which TOTAL is a partner were redefined: 15, 16 & 32 (formerly C 137, 75%(2)), 70 & 87 (formerly C 17, 75%(2)), 129 & 130 (formerly NC 115, 30%(2)) and 130 & 131 (formerly NC 186, 24%(2)).

In offshore zones 15, 16 and 32, production resumed in September 2011 and reached its former level within a few days. Exploration work is expected to restart in 2012.

In onshore zones 70 and 87, production resumed in January 2012. It will gradually be ramped back up to plateau level.

In addition, the Group expects to continue the development of the Dahra and Garian fields.

In onshore zones 129, 130 and 131, production resumed in October 2011. A return to plateau level

production is expected during 2012. The seismic campaign started before the events is expected to resume by the end of 2012.

In the onshore Murzuk Basin, following a successful appraisal well drilled on the discovery made on a portion of Block NC 191 (100%(2), operator), a development plan was submitted to the authorities in 2009. After the interruption related to the events, discussions with the authorities have resumed.

InMadagascar, TOTAL acquired in 2008 a 60% stake in the Bemolanga license (operator), to appraise the oil sand accumulations it contains. The appraisal phase did not confirm the feasibility of the mining development of the resources. However, the contract was extended by one year until June 2012 to assess the conventional exploration potential of the license.

InMauritania, TOTAL has exploration operations on the Ta7 and Ta8 licenses (60%, operator), located in the Taoudenni Basin. In January 2012, TOTAL (90%, operator) acquired interests in two exploration licenses: Block C9 in ultra-deep offshore, and Block Ta29 onshore in the Taoudenni Basin.

On the Ta7 license, a 1,220 km 2D seismic survey was shot in 2011 and is being interpreted.

On the Ta8 license, drilling of the exploration well ended in 2010. Results from the well were disappointing.

On the C9 and Ta29 licenses, a seismic acquisition campaign is planned as the first phase of the exploration program.

InNigeria, the Group’s production was 287 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 301 kboe/d in 2010 and 235 kboe/d in 2009. TOTAL has been present in Nigeria since 1962. It operates seven production licenses (OML) out of the forty-four in which it has a stake, and two exploration licenses (OPL) out of the eight in which it has a stake. The Group is also active in LNG through Nigeria LNG and the Brass LNG project. With regard to recent changes in acreage:

In 2011, TOTAL (operator) increased its stake from 45.9% to 48.3% in Block 1 of the Joint Development Zone, administered jointly by Nigeria and São Tomé and Principe.

The divestment of 10% of the Group’s stakes held through the joint venture operated by Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) in Blocks OML 26 and 42 has been finalized.

 

 

 

(1)

Interest held by the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%, INPEX Corporation 49.99% since February 2013).

(2) 

Total Gabon is a Gabonese company whose shares are listed on Euronext Paris. TOTALThe Group holds 58.28%, the Republic of Gabon holds 25% and the public float is 16.72%.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.17


Item 4 - Business Overview

seismic survey campaign covering 3,500 km2 that was conducted during the initial exploration period, 25% of the surface area of the five blocks was relinquished. In 2013, two exploration wells were drilled in Blocks L7 and L11b, but did not result in positive results. In 2012, the Group also acquired the L22 offshore license (100%, operator), located in the same basin and covering a surface area of more than 10,000 km2 in water depths ranging from 2,000 m to 3,500 m. In December 2013, TOTAL sold 30% of its stake in this license. A 2D seismic survey and sea core drilling operations are planned for 2014 on the L22 offshore license.

InLibya, the Group’s production in 2013 was 50 kb/d compared to 62 kb/d in 2012 and 20 kb/d in 2011. TOTAL is a partner in the following contract zones: 15, 16 & 32 (75%(1)), 70 & 87 (75%(1)), 129 & 130 (30%(1)) and 130 & 131 (24%(1) and Block NC191 (100%(1), operator).

Production which, in 2012, had returned to its level prior to the events of 2011 was affected from mid-2013 onward by the blockade of most of the country’s terminals and pipelines due to social and political unrest.

In onshore zones 70 and 87 (Mabruk), production has been affected since August 2013 due to the blockade of the Es Sider export terminal. Development of the Garian field was approved in July 2013 and production at the field is expected to start in the third quarter 2014.

In onshore zones 129, 130 and 131, production was stopped in 2013 during several months due to the blocking of the production installation and the evacuation pipeline. The seismic survey campaign, which was interrupted in 2011 due to force majeure, has not yet resumed. However, the exploration of these blocks continued in 2013 with the drilling of three wells.

In the onshore Murzuk basin, a plan for the development of Block NC 191 was submitted to the authorities in 2009. Discussions have resumed following the interruptions associated with the events of 2011.

In offshore zones 15, 16 and 32 (Al Jurf), production has not been affected by the social unrest in the country. The drilling of two exploration wells scheduled for the second quarter of 2013 was postponed due to technical reasons. The first of these wells was started at the end of 2013.

InMadagascar, TOTAL is active on the Bemolanga 3102 license (60%, operator). Since the exploitation of oil sand accumulations is no longer planned, TOTAL is refocusing on the conventional exploration of the block, which is expected to continue in 2014 with a 2D seismic survey following the approval of an additional2-year extension of the exploration phase by the local authorities.

InMorocco, the Anzarane offshore reconnaissance contract covering an offshore zone of 100,000 km2, which was granted in December 2011 to TOTAL and ONHYM (National Bureau of Petroleum and Mines), was extended for one year in December 2013. A 3D seismic survey campaign covering 5,900 km2 that started in late 2012 was completed in July 2013. The collected data is currently being processed.

InMauritania, the Group has exploration operations on the Ta7 and Ta8 licenses (60%, operator) located in the Taoudenni basin. In 2012, TOTAL acquired interests in two exploration licenses

(90%, operator): Block C9 in ultra-deep offshore, and Block Ta29 onshore in the Taoudenni basin. During 2013, TOTAL sold 18% of its stake in Block Ta29, but retains operatorship and a 72% interest.

Following a 2D seismic survey performed in 2011 on license Ta7, well Ta7-1 was drilled in 2013. Tests have been conducted, but they did not allow to highlight hydrocarbons in commercial quantity.

On Block Ta29, a 900 km2 seismic was performed in 2012. The processing and the interpretation of these seismic data have been completed. Studies are underway to identify a prospect on this block.

A 3D seismic survey campaign covering 4,700 km2 was conducted on Block C9 in 2013. The data is currently being processed and interpreted.

InMozambique, TOTAL acquired in 2012 a 40% stake in the production sharing contract regarding offshore Blocks 3 and 6. Located in the Rovuma basin, these two blocks cover a total surface area of 15,250 km² in water depths ranging from 0 m to 2,500 m. An exploration well was drilled in 2012 and half of the surface area of the two blocks was relinquished in 2013 at the start of the second exploration period.

InNigeria, Group production in 2013 was 261 kboe/d compared to 279 kboe/d in 2012 and 287 kboe/d in 2011. These declines are primarily due to the sharp increase in oil bunkering and in 2013 the blockade of Nigeria LNG export cargos. Despite such factors negatively affecting production, Nigeria remained the main contributor to the Group’s production.

TOTAL, which has been present in the country since 1962, operates six production licenses (OML) out of the thirty-eight in which it has a stake, and one out of the four exploration licenses (OPL) in which it is present.

Regarding variations in TOTAL’s licenses:

In September 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the authorities to increase its stake in exploration license OPL 285 from 26.67% to 60%. In May 2013, TOTAL obtained the approval of the authorities for the renewal of licenses OML 99, 100 and 102 for a period of twenty years.

On the OML 138 license (20%), TOTAL started production in the Usan offshore field in 2012 (180 kb/d, FPSO capacity), which reached the level of 130 kboe/d in 2013. Since February 2014, TOTAL is no longer the operator of the OML 138 license. In 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement for the sale of its 20% stake in Block OML 138. The approval by the authorities has not yet been received.

TOTAL decided not to continue its exploration activities in JDZ Block 1 (48.6%, operator) following the analysis of the results of wells drilled in 2012. Block was relinquished in September 2013. Also, the Block OPL 221 was relinquished in November 2013.

TOTAL sold its 10% stake in Blocks OML 26 and 42 in 2011 and in Blocks OML 30, 34 and 40 in 2012. These interests had previously been indirectly controlled via the joint venture Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC).

(2)(1) 

TOTAL’s stake in the foreign consortium.

18TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013

TOTAL owns 15% of the Nigeria LNG gas liquefaction plant, located on Bonny Island, with an overall LNG capacity of 22.7 Mt/y. In 2011, the plant’s operating rate continued to increase and reached 81%, compared to 72% in 2010 and 50% in 2009, mainly due to the increased reliability of gas deliveries from the other suppliers.


Item 4 - Business Overview

Preliminary work continued in 2011 prior to launching the Brass LNG gas liquefaction plant project (17%), which calls for the construction of two trains, each with a capacity of 5 Mt/y. Calls for tenders for the construction of the plant and loading facilities are underway.

 

TOTAL continues, with its effortsdevelopments, to meet the growing domestic demand for gas and to strengthen its ability to supply gas to the LNG projects in which it owns a stake and to meet the growing domestic demand for gas:stake:

On the OML 136 license (40%), the positive results for the Agge 3 appraisal well confirmed the development potential of the license. Development studies are underway.

As part of its joint venture with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), TOTAL is continuing with the project to increase the production capacity of the OML 58 license (40%, operator) from 370 Mcf/d to 550 Mcf/d of gas in 2012. A second phase of this project is expected to allow the development of other resources through these facilities.

On the OML 112/117 licenses (40%), TOTAL continued development studies in 2011 for the Ima gas field.

 

As part of its joint venture with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), TOTAL is pursuing the project to increase the gas production capacity of the OML 58 license (40%, operator) from 370 Mcf/d to 550 Mcf/d.

On the OML 102 license (40%, operator), TOTAL confirmed the launch ofis continuing to develop the Ofon phase 2 project, which was launched in 2011, with the signingan expected capacity of the main construction contracts, with70 kboe/d and production start-up is scheduled for the end of 2014. In 2011, the Group also discovered Etisong North, located 15 km from the currently-producing Ofon field, which is currently producing. This is the second exploration well on the Etisong hub after the Etisong Main discovery made in 2008.field. The exploration campaign continued in 2012 with the drilling of the Eben well, which is expected to continue with two additional wells in 2012.also south of Ofon. The positive results produced by this well further enhance the interest of the future Etisong-Eben development hub as a satellite of the Ofon field.

On the OML 130 license (24%, operator), the Akpo field, which started up in March 2009, reached plateau productiondevelopment of 225 kboe/d in 2010. Production was limited between March and September 2011 by a technical issue on the engine of the gas reinjection compressor (liquids production of 160 kb/d instead of 190 kb/d). On this license, the Group is actively working on the Egina field for which a development(capacity of 200 kboe/d) was launched in June 2013 and contracts have been awarded. Production start-up is expected at year-end 2017.

plan has been approved by the Nigerian authorities. Calls for tender are underway and construction is expected to start in 2012.

On the OML 13899 license (20%(40%, operator), TOTAL finalizedengineering work is underway to develop the developmentIkike field, where production is expected to start in 2017 (estimated capacity of the Usan offshore project (180 kb/d, production capacity) with the drilling of production wells, installation of sub-sea equipment and connection to the FPSO. Production started up in February 2012.55 kboe/d).

TOTAL also strengthened its deep offshore position with the ongoing development of the Bonga Northwest project onOn the OML 118 license (12.5%112/117 licenses (40%)., development studies have been suspended waiting for the resolution of contractual issues that arose in 2013

Due to the relative calm with regard to safetyTOTAL is also active in the Niger Delta regionLNG sector with a 15% holding in 2011, it has been possiblethe company Nigeria LNG, which possesses a liquefaction plant of a total capacity of 22 Mt/y. In addition, TOTAL holds a 17% stake in Brass LNG, which is continuing to maintain oilstudy the project for a gas liquefaction plant with two LNG trains of a capacity of 5 Mt/y each.

The production that is not operated by the Group in Nigeria comes mainly from the SPDC joint venture, in which TOTAL hasholds a 10% stake, at close to 2010 levels.stake. The SPDC joint venture’s gassharp increase of oil bunkering in 2013 had an impact on onshore production, was higher in 2011 as a resultwell as on the integrity of the contributionfacilities and the local environment.

In addition, TOTAL also holds a 12.5% stake in the OML 118 deep-offshore license. In connection with this license, the Bonga field contributed 15 kboe/d to Group production in 2013. The partners continued the development of the Gbaran-UbieBonga Northwest project which started up in 2010.2013. On the OML 118 license, a pre-unitization agreement relating to the Bonga South West discovery has been signed in December 2013.

InUganda, TOTAL finalizedhas been active since 2012 and holds a 33.33% interest in February 2012 its farm-in for an interest of 33.33%, which covers the EA-1, EA-1A and EA-2 licenses as well as the new Kanywataba license and the Kingfisher production license. All of these licenses are located in the Lake Albert region, where oil resources have already been discovered and a substantial potential remains to be explored.

discovered. TOTAL will beis the operator of licenses EA-1 and EA-1A and a partner on the other licenses. TOTAL

On the appraisal license EA-1, a campaign of wells, production tests and its partners Tullow and CNOOCa 3D seismic survey are embarking on an ambitious exploration and appraisal program from 2012 onwards. First priorityunderway. Five development plans will be givensubmitted to the authorities before the end of 2014: Ngiri (submitted in December 2013), Jobi-Rii (April 2014), and Mpyo, Gunya and Jobi East (December 2014).

The EA-1A license expired in February 2013, following a campaign involving the drilling of five exploration of Kanywataba and EA-1 licenses westwells that resulted in one discovery (Lyec). With the exception of the Nile.scope relating to this discovery, the license has been returned to the authorities.

On the appraisal license EA-2, the campaign of wells and production tests started in 2012 continued during 2013. An additional well is due to be drilled in 2014. Two development plans were submitted to the authorities in June 2013 (Kasamene and Wahrindi fields, as well as those of Kigogole, Ngege, Ngara and Nsoga).

The development plan for the Kingfisher field, which is located on the EA-3 production license, was approved by the authorities in September 2013. The basic engineering studies are currently being prepared.

The Kanywataba exploration well was drilled in June 2012 with negative results. The Kanywataba license expired in August 2012 and was returned to the authorities.

At the initiative of the Ugandan government, discussions are underway concerning the construction of a refinery that will be developed in two phases (30 kb/d in the first phase followed by a second phase providing an additional 30 kb/d), as well as an export pipeline.

In theRepublic of the Congo, the Group’s production in 2013 was 93 kboe/d compared to 113 kboe/d in 2012 and 123 kboe/d in 2011, compared2011. The decrease in production was due in particular to 120 kboe/dthe end of plateau production at Moho Bilondo in 2010mid-2010 and 106 kboe/d in 2009.to a planned shut-down on the Nkossa field.

 

OnThe development of the Lianzi field was approved in 2012. Located in the offshore unitization zone Block 14K (36.75%) between Angola and the Republic of Congo (Haute Mer license), this field will be developed by a tieback to the existing Benguela-Belize-Lobito-Tomboco platform (Block 14 in Angola). Production start-up is expected in 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized block is held 26.75% through Total E&P Congo and 10% through Angola Block 14 BV.

The Moho Bilondo offshore field (53.5%, operator), which started up in April 2008, drilling of development wells continued until 2010. The field reached plateau production of 90 kboe/d in June 2010.

Two positive appraisal wells (Bilondo Marine 2 & 3) drilled at year-end 2010mid-2010. The field has now started its decline. The Phase 1b and Moho North projects were launched in March 2013 following agreements on the southern portioncontractual and fiscal conditions in 2012. Production start-up is planned for 2015 and 2016, respectively, with estimated production capacity of the field confirmed an additional growth potential as an extension of existing facilities. Studies are underway140 kboe/d (40 kboe/d for the development of these additional reserves.

The development of the resources in the northern portion of the field, the potential of which was bolstered by appraisalPhase 1b and exploration wells drilled in 2008 and 2009, is also being examined (Moho North project)100 kboe/d for Moho North).

Production onat Libondo (65%, operator), which is part of the Kombi-Likalala-Libondo operating license, started up in March 2011. Plateau production has reached 12 kb/d. A substantial portionkboe/d in 2011.

In July 2013, TOTAL obtained the Haute Mer B license (34.62%, operator) in association with other partners.

As part of the equipmentrenewal of the Loango and Zatchi licenses, an agreement on the related contractual and fiscal conditions was sourced locallysigned in Pointe-Noire throughOctober 2013. This agreement is subject to approval by the redevelopmentparliament. TOTAL’s interest in these licenses will change respectively from 50% to 42.50% for Loango and from 35% to 29.75% for Zatchi with retroactive effect in October 2013.

In December 2013, in connection with a share capital increase of Total E&P Congo, Qatar Petroleum International Upstream (QPI) entered into the share capital of this subsidiary at a construction site that had been idle for several years.level of 15%.

In theDemocratic Republic of the Congo, following the Presidential decree approving TOTAL’s entry in 2011 as operator with a 60% interest in Block III of the Graben Albertine, the exploration permit was issued in January 2012 by the Minister of Hydrocarbons for a period of three years.years and subsequently extended by an additional year due to the postponement of the works in light of the general security situation in the eastern part of

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.19


Item 4 - Business Overview

the country. This block is located in the Lake Albert region. TOTAL acquired an additional 6.66% of this block in March 2012. The prospecting program is limited to the northern portion of the license, which is outside the Virunga park. A helicopter acquisition of gravimetric and magnetic data was completed in August 2012 with encouraging results. The 2D seismic survey campaign prepared in 2013 is scheduled to start in 2014.

In theRepublic of South Sudan, which became an independentTOTAL is negotiating a new contract with the state authorities that would make it possible to resume exploration activities in part of Block B. Since the independence of the Republic of South Sudan on July 9, 2011, TOTAL holds an interestis no longer present in Block B and is preparing with state authorities the resumption of exploration activities on this block.Sudan.

North America

In 2011,2013, TOTAL’s production in North America was 6773 kboe/d, representing 3% of the Group’s overalltotal production, compared to 6569 kboe/d in 20102012 and 2467 kboe/d in 2009.2011.

InCanada, TOTAL signedthe Group’s production in December 2010 a strategic partnership with Suncor related2013 was 13 kboe/d compared to the Fort Hills12 kboe/d in 2012 and Joslyn mining projects and the Voyageur upgrader.11 kboe/d in 2011. The partnership was finalized in March 2011 and allows TOTAL to reorganizeGroup’s oil sands portfolio is focused around two major hubs the different oil sands assets that it has acquired over the last few years:main hubs: on the one hand, a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) hub focused on continuing developments at Surmont’s (50%) ongoing development, and, on the other, hand, a mining and upgrading hub, which includes the TOTAL-operated Joslyn (38.25%) and Suncor-operated, operator), Fort Hills (39.2%) and Northern Lights (50%, operator) mining projects and the Suncor-operated Voyageur upgrader (49%) project. The Group also hasas well as a 50%100% stake in the Northern Lights mining project (operator) and 100% of a number of oil sands leases acquired through severala series of auction sales. In 2011, the Group’s production was 11 kb/d, compared to 10 kb/d in 2010 and 8 kb/d in 2009.

 

On the Surmont lease, commercial production in SAGD mode of the first development phase, which started up in late 2007, is now producing around 25 kb/d of bitumen from thirty-five well pairs. The operator plans to drill additional wells were drilled in 2012 and to continue to convert the activation method on the existing wells from gas lift to electric submersible pump (ESP)2013 in order to improveoptimize production. The decision to construct an additional steam generation unit was also made with the same aim in mind. The drilling of additional wells is expected to continue in 2014.

In early 2010, the partners ofinvolved in the project decided to launch the construction of the second development

phase. The goal of production start-up from Surmont Phase 2 has been set for 2015 and overall production capacity from the field is expected to increase to 130 kb/d. In April 2011, the authorities issued a license permitting production (phases 1 and 2) of up to 136 kb/kboe/d.

 

TheOn the Fort Hills project (production capacity estimated at 180 kb/d), the final investment decision was made in October 2013. Site preparation work is underway and production start-up is planned for the end of 2017.

On the Joslyn lease is expectedlicense, engineering studies are currently being conducted in order to be developed through mining, with a first development phase having an anticipated capacity of 100 kb/d.

The basic engineering foroptimize production from the Joslyn North Mine started in March 2010. To take into account changes to the project following the partnership with Suncor, the revision of the basic engineering is expected to be finalized in 2012. A decision to launch the project is planned for 2013.

Public hearings that are necessary for the project to be approved by the Canadian authorities were held in autumn 2010. The project was recommended as being in the public interest in January 2011, and approval from the Alberta authorities (Order in Council, OIC) was obtained in April 2011. The provincial authorizations from the Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) and Alberta Environment were also obtained in May and September 2011, respectively. The project received federal approval (Federal OIC and approval from the Canadian Ministry of the Environment) at the end of 2011. As a result, preliminary site preparation work began in early 2012 and production is scheduled to start in 2018.

TOTAL closed in September 2010 the acquisition of UTS and its main asset: a 20% stake in the Fort Hills lease. In December 2010, as part of their partnership, TOTAL acquired from Suncor an additional 19.2% stake in the lease, thereby increasing its stake to 39.2%. Basic engineering and site preparation work are underway. Start-up of the Fort Hills mining project, which has already been approved by the relevant authorities for a first development phase with a capacity of 160 kb/d, is expected in 2016.project.

TOTAL had also acquired in late December 2010 a 49% stake in Suncor’s Voyageur upgrader project. This Voyageur upgrader project, which Suncor mothballed at year-end 2008, resumed in 2011 and is expected to start up concurrently with the Fort Hills project. As a consequence, the Group has abandoned its upgrader project in Edmonton.

In 2008, the Group closed the acquisition of Synenco, the two principal assets of which are a 60% stake in the Northern Lights project and 100% of the adjacent McClelland lease. In early 2009, the Group sold to

 

Sinopec,In March 2013, TOTAL concluded an agreement for the other partner in the project, a 10%sale of its 49% stake in the Northern Lights project and a 50% stake in the McClelland lease, reducing its equity stake in each of the assets to 50%. The Northern Lights project is expected to be developed through mining.Voyageurupgraderproject.

In theUnited States, the Group’s production in 2013 was 60 kboe/d compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 56 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 55 kboe/d in 2010 and 16 kboe/d in 2009.2011.

 

In the Gulf of Mexico:

  

ThePhase 2 of the deep-offshore Tahiti oil field (17%) started producing in 2009 and reached production of 135 kboe/d. Phase 2, which was launched in September 2010,2010. This phase comprises drilling four injection wells and two producing wells. WaterThe injection of water started in February 2012. This phase should partly offsetThe first producing well was put into operation in late 2013 and the second producing well, the drilling of which is currently being completed, is due to start production decline seen on wells currently in production.2014.

  

Development of the first phase ofThe Chinook 4 well in the deep-offshore Chinook project (33.33%) is ongoing. Thestarted production test is scheduled to start in mid-2012 after sub-sea work carried out following an incident on onethe third quarter of 2012.

Drilling of the risers.Chinook 5 well was completed in 2013 and started production in early 2014.

  

In 2009, TOTAL and Cobalt had signed an agreement related to the merger of their deep offshore acreage, with Cobalt operating the exploration phase. The TOTAL (40%) — Cobalt (60%, operator) alliance’s exploratory drilling campaign, which was launched in 2009, and the drilling of the first three wells produced disappointing results. This campaign was disrupted due toresumed in 2012 after the U.S. government’sgovernment lifted the moratorium on offshoredeep-offshore drilling operations from May to October 2010 and resumed atoperations. This resulted in the beginning of 2012 with the start of drilling of the Ligurian 2 well.

In April 2010,well (dry well) together with the Group disposedNorth Platte well at which a major oil discovery was made and for which studies are currently being conducted. The Ardennes well, which was drilled in 2013, gave disappointing results, just like the Aegean well, which was completed in December 2013. The Aegean well is the last one of its equity stakes in the Matterhorn and Virgo operated fields.drilling campaign.

FollowingTOTAL is active in shale gas production in Texas and has a 25% stake in the signature of an agreement in late 2009, a joint venture was set up with Chesapeake to produce shale gasportfolio in the Barnett Shale Basin, Texas. Under thisbasin through its participation in a joint venture TOTAL owns 25% of Chesapeake’s portfoliowith Chesapeake. Given the drop in gas prices in the area. In 2011, approximatelyUnited States, drilling operations have been sharply reduced from 2012 onwards (approximately sixty wells drilled in 2013 compared to 100 in 2012 and more than 300 additionalin 2011).

TOTAL is also active in the production of shale gas in Ohio and has a 25% stake in the liquid-rich Utica shale gas play through a joint venture with Chesapeake and EnerVest. More than 200 liquids-rich gas wells were drilled enabling gas production reaching 1.4 Bcf/d in 100% at the end2013 (compared to approximately 100 in 2012) and approximately 190 of 2011. these have been connected and started producing (compared to forty-seven in 2012).

Engineers from TOTAL are assigned to the teams led by Chesapeake.

At the end of 2011, TOTAL signed an agreement with Chesapeake and EnerVest to enter into a joint venture. Pursuant to the agreement, TOTAL acquired a 25% share in Chesapeake’s and EnerVest’s liquid-rich area

 

of the UticaThe Group holds a 50% stake in American Shale Oil LLC (AMSO) to developin situ shale play (Ohio). At the end of 2011, thirteen wellsoil technology. The firstin situ heating tests have been drilled acrossperformed and are resulting in adaptations to the acreage with very promising results seen from each well in terms of productivity and liquid content.selected technology.

In 2009, the Group closed the acquisition of a 50% stake in American Shale Oil LLC (AMSO) to develop shale oil technology. The pilot to develop this technology is underway in Colorado.

In 2012, TOTAL entered into a 50/50 association with Red Leaf Resources for the ex-situ development of oil shale and agreed to fund a production pilot before any larger-scale development. In addition, TOTAL finalized an agreement to purchase approximately 120 km2 of additional land in Colorado and Utah, with a view to developingin situ shale oil techniques (AMSO technique) orex-situ techniques (Red Leaf technique).

InMexico, TOTAL is conducting various studies with state-owned PEMEX under a general technical cooperation agreement renewed in July 2011 for a period of five years.

South America

In 2011,2013, TOTAL’s production in South America was 188166 kboe/d, representing 8%7% of the Group’s overalltotal production, compared to 179 kboe/d in 2010 and 182 kboe/d in 2009.2012 and 188 kboe/d in 2011.

InArgentina, where TOTAL has been present since 1978, the Group operatesoperated about 30%(1)(1) of the country’s gas production.production in 2013. The Group’s production in 2013 was 8678 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 83 kboe/d in 20102012 and 8086 kboe/d in 2009.2011. In order to encourage investment in exploration and production, the Argentinean government has concluded gas price agreements with various producers as of December 2012. Under the terms of these agreements, the Argentinean government guarantees the price of gas for quantities above a fixed production level in exchange for

(1)

Source: Argentinean Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services — Energy Secretary.

20TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

compliance with defined production targets and applicable penalties (i.e., “Deliver or Pay”). In February 2013, TOTAL signed an agreement of this type for a period of five years with retroactive effect from December 1, 2012.

 

In Tierra del Fuego, the Group notably operates the Carina and Aries offshore fields (37.5%). The awardFollowing the re-appraisal of the contracts to build the offshore facilities for the developmentreserves of the Vega Pleyade gas and condensatesCarina field, is scheduled for 2012. The project is scheduledthree additional wells are expected to startbe drilled from the existing platform. These wells should allow production in 2014 and should make it possible to maintainlevels from the productionfacilities operated by the Group in Tierra del Fuego to be maintained at around 615about 630 Mcf/d.d until the Vega Pleyade field (37.5%, operator) starts up in 2015. Development of this field started in October 2013.

In the Neuquén Basin,basin, TOTAL started a drilling campaign in 2011 on its operatedmining licenses in 2011 in order to assess their shale gas and oil potential. TheIn 2012 and 2013, this campaign, which started on the Aguada Pichana license (27.3%, operator) and, was extended to all the blocks operated by the Group: San Roque (24.7%, operator) fields, will be extended subsequently to the Rincon, Rincón la Ceniza and La Escalonada licenses acquired in 2010 (85%, operator) and to the four fields acquired in 2011:, Aguada de Castro (42.5%, operator), and Pampa de lalas Yeguas II (42.5%, operator), as well as to the blocks operated by third parties: Cerro Las Minas (40%) and, Cerro Partido (45%), Rincón de Aranda (45%), and Veta Escondida (45%).

The connectionfirst results, all positive, of satellite discoveriesthe production tests on the edge ofwells drilled during this campaign permit envisaging various development scenarios in the mainregion. A pilot development intended to test the unconventional production potential at the Aguada Pichana field, particularlyBlock is expected to enter into production in the Las Carceles canyons area, and the increase in compression capacity at San Roque, have extended plateau production of the mature fields in these two blocks.late 2014.

InBolivia, the Group’s production, primarily gas, amountedwas 28 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 27 kboe/d in 2012 and 25 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 20 kboe/d

(1)Source: Argentinean Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services — Energy Secretary.

in 2010 and 2009.2011. TOTAL has stakes in sixseven licenses: three producingproduction licenses, San Alberto and San Antonio (15%) and Block XX Tarija Oeste (41%), two licenses in the development phase, Aquio and threeIpati (60%, operator), and two licenses in the exploration or appraisal phase, — Aquio and Ipati (80%, operator) and Rio Hondo (50%) and Azero (50%, operator).

 

Production started up in February 2011 on the gas and condensates Itaú field located on Block XX Tarija Oeste; it is routed to the existing facilities of the neighboring San Alberto field. A development plan for a second phase at Itaú was approved by the local authorities in June 2011. In early 2011, TOTAL decreased its stake in Block XX Tarija Oeste to 41% after divesting 34% and is no longer the operator.

In 2004, TOTAL discovered the Incahuasi gas field on the Ipati Block. Following the interpretation of the 3D seismic shot in 2008, an appraisal well was drilled on the adjacent Aquio Block and the extension of the discovery to the north was confirmed in 2011.

Due to the positive results from the well, TOTAL filed a declaration of commerciality for the Aquio and Ipati Blocks, which was approved by the local authorities in April 2011. Additional appraisal work is underway, notably with the drilling of a second well on the Ipati Block in 2012.

In 2010, TOTAL signed an agreement to dispose of 20% in the Aquio and Ipati licenses to Gazprom. Following approval of the agreement by the Bolivian authorities, TOTAL will have a 60% stake in the licenses.

Production started in 2011 on the Itaú gas and condensates field located on Block XX Tarija Oeste; it is routed to the existing facilities of the neighboring San Alberto field. Phase 2 of the development of the field entered into production at the end of 2013.

In 2004, TOTAL discovered the Incahuasi gas field on the Ipati Block. In 2011 and 2013, two additional wells confirmed the extension of the discovery northwards onto the adjacent Aquio Block as well as southwards onto the Ipati license. In April 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the authorities to start development of Phase 1 of the project, including the connection of three existing wells to a central processing plant of 6.5 Mm3/d. The key contracts relating to the construction of the plant and its connection to the export network were granted in October 2013. In July 2013, TOTAL sold 20% stakes in the Aquio and Ipati fields thereby reducing its interest in these fields from 80 to 60%.

In August 2013, TOTAL acquired a 50% stake in the Azero exploration license in the Andean Piedmont. This is located to the west of the Ipati and Aquio Blocks and covers an area of more than 7,800 km2.

InBrazil, TOTALthe Group has equity stakes in threefourteen exploration blocks: Blocks BC-2 (41.2%) and BM-C-14 (50%) in the Campos Basin, and Block BM-S-54 (20%) in the Santos Basin.licenses.

 

The Xerelete field is mainly located on Block BC2, with an extension on Block BM-C-14. A unitization agreement was finalized by the partners on both blocks and submitted to the authorities for approval in April 2011.

In 2012, pending the authorities’ approval, TOTAL is expected to become operator of the unitized Xerelete field. After seismic reprocessing, a pre-salt prospect was found under the Xerelete discovery made in 2001 at a water depth of 2,400 m. TOTAL is planning to resume drilling activities on the block in 2012.

On Block BM-S-54, a first well was drilled in the pre-salt at the end of 2010 on the Gato do Mato structure, and a significant oil column was found. The appraisal plan approved by the authorities in October 2011 includes testing the Gato do Mato well and, if

In October 2013, TOTAL acquired a 20% stake in the Libra field. This field is currently being assessed and is the largest pre-salt oil field discovered to date in the Santos basin off the coast of Brazil. The field is located in very deep water (2,000 m) approximately 170 km off the coast of Rio de Janeiro and covers an area of 1,550 km2. Additional

  

that test is successful, drilling a second well onexploration works including contractual obligations to be realized by the structure in 2012. Asend of 2017 and appraisal and development studies of the Gato do Mato structure extends beyond the boundaries of Block BM-S-54 into a free zone, a draft unitization agreement has been submitted to the authorities.field were launched.

AtFollowing the end of 2011,eleventh call for tender organized by the Brazilian authorities in May 2013, TOTAL acquired a second structure (Epitonium) identifiedstake in ten new operating licenses. Holding a 40% stake, the Group operates five blocks (FZA-M-57, FZA-M-86, FZA-M-88, FZA-M-125 and FZA-M-127) located in the Foz do Amazonas basin and has a 45% interest in a block (CE-M-661) located in the Ceara basin. TOTAL also has a 25% stake in three blocks (ES-M-669, ES-M-671 and ES-M-743) located in the Espirito Santo basin and a 50% share in another block (BAR-M-346) located in the Barreirinhas basin.

TOTAL also has a stake in the Xerelete field, which the Group has operated since 2012. This stake is primarily located on Block BC-2 (41.2%) and extends into Block BM-C-14 (50%). The drilling of a well targeting pre-salt horizons was launched at the beginning of January 2014.

A well was drilled in 2012 in the Gato Do Mato field, which is located in Block BM-S-54 (20%) and was drilled.discovered in the Santos basin in 2010. The encouraging results are currently being analyzed in order to define the next stages in the assessment of the well are under analysis.field.

InColombia, where TOTAL no longer has had operationsproduction since 1973, the Group’s productionsale in 2012 of one of its subsidiaries, TEPMA BV, which held a stake in the Cusiana field. Production was 6 kboe/d in 2012 and 11 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 18 kboe/d in 2010 and 23 kboe/d in 2009. The decline in production in 2011 was mainly due to the divestment of TOTAL’s stake in CEPSA, which was finalized in July 2011.

On the Cusiana field (11.6%), production from the project to extract 6 kb/d of LPG started at the end of 2011.

Following the discovery of Huron-1 in 2009 on the Niscota (50%) exploration license in 2009 and the drilling of the second well, Huron-2, which yielded positive test results in April 2013, a 3D seismic survey in 2010, the first appraisalthird well, has been underway since mid-2011. A second appraisal wellHuron-3, was drilled with disappointing results. The conceptual development studies have started for a declaration of commerciality that is expected in 2012.during the second quarter of 2014.

In 2011, TOTAL soldAfter selling 10% of its stake in the Ocensa oil pipeline in 2011 and reducing its holdinginterest in this asset to 5.2%.

In February 2012,, TOTAL signed an agreement to sell TEPMA BV. This wholly-owned affiliate ofsold its entire stake in 2013, but kept its transport rights. TOTAL holds the working interesthas relinquished its stakes in the Cusiana field as well as a participation in OAM and ODC pipelines in Colombia. This transaction is subject to approvalthat were previously held by the relevant authorities.TEPMA BV.

InFrench Guiana,

Middle East

3241,1555363119904933171,370570

United Arab Emirates

247712602337024622672240

Iran

Iraq

71766

Oman

246637246137246236

Qatar

365581373856013944616155

Syria

1121853

Yemen

104599510299651240286

Total production

1,1676,1842,2991,2205,8802,3001,2266,0982,346

Including share of equity affiliates

3251,9556873081,6356113161,383571

Algeria

10310

Angola

163

Colombia

44

Venezuela

357373874044745

United Arab Emirates

240612532256123721962231

Oman

236635236034226234

Qatar

838578736474838278

Russia

1996219715844171946595

Yemen

458842995540274

(a)

The Group’s production in Canada consists of bitumen only. All of the Group’s bitumen production is in Canada.

12TOTAL owns a 25%S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

PRESENTATION OF PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES BY REGION

The table below sets forth, by country, TOTAL’s producing assets, the year in which TOTAL’s activities commenced, the Group’s interest in each asset and whether TOTAL is operator of the asset.

TOTAL’s producing assets as of December 31, 2013 (a)
Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

Africa

Algeria

1952Tin Fouye Tabankort (35.00%)

Angola

1953Girassol, Jasmim, Rosa, Dalia, Pazflor (Block 17) (40.00%)Cabinda Block 0 (10.00%)

Kuito, BBLT, Tombua-Landana (Block 14) (20.00%)(b)

Angola LNG (13.60%)

Gabon

1928

Anguille (100.00%)

Anguille Nord Est (100.00%)

Anguille Sud-Est (100.00%)

Atora (40.00%)

Avocette (57.50%)

Ayol Marine (100.00%)

Baliste (50.00%)

Barbier (100.00%)

Baudroie Marine (50.00%)

Baudroie Nord Marine (50.00%)

Coucal (57.50%)

Girelle (100.00%)

Gonelle (100.00%)

Grand Anguille Marine (100.00%)

Grondin (100.00%)

Hylia Marine (75.00%)

Lopez Nord (100.00%)

Mandaros (100.00%)

M’Boukou (57.5%)

M’Boumba (100.00%)

Mérou Sardine Sud (50.00%)

Pageau (100.00%)

Port Gentil Océan (100.00%)

Port Gentil Sud Marine (100.00%)

Tchengue (100.00%)

Torpille (100.00%)

Torpille Nord Est (100.00%)

Rabi Kounga (47.50%)

Libya

1959

Zones 15, 16 & 32 (75.00%)(c)

Zones 70 & 87 (75.00%)(c)

Zones 129 & 130 (30.00%)(c)

Zones 130 & 131 (24.00%)(c)

Nigeria

1962

OML 58 (40.00%)

OML 99 Amenam-Kpono (30.40%)

OML 100 (40.00%)

OML 102 (40.00%)

OML 102-Ekanga (40.00%)

OML 130 (24.00%)

OML 138 (20.00%)

Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC 10.00%)

OML 118 - Bonga (12.50%)

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.13


Item 4 - Business Overview

TOTAL’s producing assets as of December 31, 2013 (a)
Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

The Congo, Republic of

1928

Kombi-Likalala-Libondo (65.00%)

Moho Bilondo (53.50%)

Nkossa (53.50%)

Nsoko (53.50%)

Sendji (55.25%)

Tchendo (65.00%)

Tchibeli-Litanzi-Loussima (65.00%)

Tchibouela (65.00%)

Yanga (55.25%)

Loango (50.00%)

Zatchi (35.00%)

North America

Canada

1999Surmont (50.00%)

United States

1957Several assets in the Barnett Shale area (25.00%)(d)
Several assets in the Utica Shale area (25.00%)(d)
Chinook (33.33%)
Tahiti (17.00%)

South America

Argentina

1978

Aguada Pichana (27.27%)

Aguada San Roque (24.71%)

Aries (37.50%)

Cañadon Alfa Complex (37.50%)

Carina (37.50%)

Hidra (37.50%)

Kaus (37.50%)

Sierra Chata (2.51%)

Bolivia

1995

San Alberto (15.00%) San Antonio (15.00%)

Itau (41.00%)

Venezuela

1980PetroCedeño (30.323%) Yucal Placer (69.50%)

Asia-Pacific

Australia

2005Various fields in UJV GLNG (27.50%)(e)

Brunei

1986Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam (37.50%)

China

2006South Sulige (49.00%)

Indonesia

1968

Bekapai (50.00%)

Handil (50.00%)

Peciko (50.00%)

Sisi-Nubi (47.90%)

South Mahakam (50.00%)

Tambora (50.00%)

Tunu (50.00%)

Badak (1.05%)

Nilam-gas and condensates (9.29%)

Nilam-oil (10.58%)

Ruby-gas and condensates(15.00%)

Myanmar

1992Yadana (31.24%)

Thailand

1990Bongkot (33.33%)

Commonwealth of Independant States

Azerbaijan

1996Shah Deniz (10.00%)

Kazakhstan

1992Kashagan (16.81%)

Russia

1991Kharyaga (40.00%)
Several fields through the participation in Novatek (16.96%)

Europe

France

1939

Lacq (100.00%)

Lagrave (100.00%)

14TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

Norway

1965

Atla (40.00%)

Skirne (40.00%)

Åsgard (7.68%)

Ekofisk (39.90%)

Ekofisk South (39.90%)

Eldfisk (39.90%)

Embla (39.90%)

Gimle (4.90%)

Glitne (21.80%)

Gungne (10.00%)

Heimdal (16.76%)

Huldra (24.33%)

Islay (5.51%)(f)

Kristin (6.00%)

Kvitebjørn (5.00%)

Mikkel (7.65%)

Morvin (6.00%)

Oseberg (14.70%)

Oseberg East (14.70%)

Oseberg South (14.70%)

Sleipner East (10.00%)

Sleipner West (9.41%)

Snøhvit (18.40%)

Stjerne (14.70%)

Tor (48.20%)

Troll I (3.69%)

Troll II (3.69%)

Tune (10.00%)

Tyrihans (23.145%)

Vale (24.24%)

Vilje (24.24%)

Visund (7.70%)

Visund South (7.70%)

Visund North (7.70%)

Yttergryta (24.50%)

The Netherlands

1964

F6a gaz (55.66%)

F6a huile (65.68%)

F15a Jurassic (38.20%)

F15a/F15d Triassic (32.47%)

F15d (32.47%)

J3a (30.00%)

K1a (40.10%)

K1b/K2a (60.00%)

K2c (60.00%)

K3b (56.16%)

K3d (56.16%)

K4a (50.00%)

K4b/K5a (36.31%)

K5b (50.00%)

K6/L7 (56.16%)

L1a (60.00%)

L1d (60.00%)

L1e (55.66%)

L1f (55.66%)

L4a (55.66%)

L4d (55.66%)

E16a (16.92%)

E17a/E17b (14.10%)

J3b/J6 (25.00%)

Q16a (6.49%)

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.15


Item 4 - Business Overview

Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

United Kingdom

1962

Alwyn North, Dunbar, Forvie North, Ellon, Grant ,Jura Nuggets (100.00%)

Elgin-Franklin, West Franklin (EFOG 46.17%)(g)

Glenelg (49.47%)

Islay (94.49%)(f)

Bruce (43.25%)

Markham unitized fields (7.35%)

Keith (25.00%)

Middle East

U.A.E.

1939Abu Dhabi-Abu Al Bu Khoosh (75.00%)

Abu Dhabi offshore (13.33%)(h)

Abu Dhabi onshore (9.50%)(i)

GASCO (15.00%)

ADGAS (5.00%)

Iraq

1920Halfaya (18.75%)(j)

Oman

1937

Various fields onshore (Block 6) (4.00%)(k)

Mukhaizna field (Block 53) (2.00%)(l)

Qatar

1936Al Khalij (100.00%)

North Field-Bloc NF Dolphin (24.50%)

North Field-Bloc NFB (20.00%)

North Field-Qatargas 2 Train 5 (16.70%)

Yemen

1987Kharir/Atuf (Block 10) (28.57%)
Various fields onshore (Block 5) (15.00%)

(a)

The Group’s interest in the local entity is approximately 100% in all cases except for Total Gabon (58.28%) and certain entities in Abu Dhabi and Oman (see notes b through l below).

(b)

Stake in the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%).

(c)

TOTAL’s stake in the Guyane Maritime license. foreign consortium.

(d)

TOTAL’s interest in the joint venture with Chesapeake.

(e)

TOTAL’s interest in the unincorporated joint venture.

(f)

The license, located about 150 km offfield of Islay extends partially in Norway. TOTAL E&P UK holds a 94.49 % and TOTAL E&P Norge 5.51%.

(g)

TOTAL holds a 46.17% indirect interest through its interest in EFOG (company 100% owned by TOTAL).

(h)

Through ADMA (equity affiliate), TOTAL holds a 13.33% interest and participates in the coast,operating company, Abu Dhabi Marine Operating Company.

(i)

Through ADPC (equity affiliate), TOTAL holds a 9.50% interest and participates in the operating company, Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operation.

(j)

TOTAL holds an interest of 18.75% in the consortium.

(k)

TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 4.00% in Petroleum Development Oman LLC, operator of Block 6, via its 10% interest in Pohol. TOTAL also holds a 5.54% interest in the Oman LNG facility (trains 1 and 2), and an indirect participation of 2.04% through OLNG in Qalhat LNG (train 3).

(l)

TOTAL holds a direct interest of 2.00% in Block 53.

Africa

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in Africa was 670 kboe/d, representing 29% of the Group’s overall production, compared to 713 kboe/d in 2012 and 659 kboe/d in 2011.

InSouth Africa, TOTAL acquired an interest in the 11B-12B license (50%, operator) in September 2013. This license, which covers an area of 19,000 km2, is located approximately 175 km south of the South African coast in water depths ranging from 200 m to 1,800 m. The drilling of an exploration well is planned for 2014.

In addition, in August 2013, the Group was granted approval by the South African authorities to convert its technical cooperation license for the Outeniqua Block (100%) into an exploration license, subject to the sale by TOTAL of 20% of its stake when the corresponding license agreement will have been negotiated and signed. The Outeniqua Block, which covers approximately 76,000 km2, is located to the southwest of the 11B-12B license in water depths ranging from 400 m to 4,000 m. A 2D seismic campaign of 7,000 km combined with sea bed core drilling activities is expected to be launched.

InAlgeria, TOTAL’s production was 21 kboe/d during 2013, compared to 23 kboe/d in 2012 and 33 kboe/d in 2011. The decline in production between 2011 and 2012 was mainly due to

the sale of TOTAL’s interest in CEPSA (48.83%), which was completed in July 2011. All of the Group’s production in Algeria now comes from the Tin Fouyé Tabenkort (TFT) field (35%). TOTAL also has stakes of 37.75% and 47% in the Timimoun and Ahnet gas development projects, respectively.

On the TFT field, plateau production was maintained at 170 kboe/d.

The development of the Timimoun field continued in 2013 and the responses for the main calls for tender (plant construction and drilling devices) have been reviewed. In February 2014, the main contract was allocated. Commercial gas production could start in 2017, with anticipated plateau production of 1.6 Bm3/year (160 Mcf/d). The 3D seismic survey of an area of approximately 26,0002,240 km2, which started in December 2012, was completed in July 2013. The data is currently being analyzed.

Within the framework of the Ahnet project, discussions are continuing between the project partners and the authorities, particularly in light of the provisions of the new 13-02 oil legislation, which provide greater incentives for the development of unconventional hydrocarbons. The anticipated plateau production is 4 Bm3/year (400 Mcf/d) as of 2018.

InAngola, the Group’s production in 2013 was 186 kboe/d, compared to 179 kboe/d in 2012 and 135 kboe/d in 2011, and

16TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

comes from Blocks 0, 14 and 17. Recent highlights include the launch of the CLOV project in 2010, the start-up of production on Pazflor in 2011, several discoveries on Blocks 15/06 and 17/06, and, finally, the acquisition of interests in exploration Blocks 25, 39 and 40 in the Kwanza basin.

Deep-offshore Block 17 (40%, operator) is TOTAL’s principal asset in Angola. It is composed of four major hubs: Girassol, Dalia, Pazflor, which are all in production, and CLOV, which is currently being developed. The Pazflor project, consisting of the Perpetua, Zinia, Hortensia and Acacia fields, has achieved plateau production (220 kb/d). The CLOV project, which was launched in 2010, will result in the installation of a fourth Floating Production, Storage and Offloading unit (FPSO) with a production capacity of 160 kbd/d. Production start-up is expected mid-2014.

On the ultra-deep-offshore Block 32 (30%, operator), the basic engineering studies for the Kaombo project were completed and the final investment decision is expected to be made in the first half of 2014. The project will permit the development of the discoveries made in the southeast portion of the block through two FPSOs with a capacity in excess of 100 kb/d each.

On Block 14 (20%(1)), production comes from the Tombua-Landana and Kuito fields as well as the BBLT project, comprising the Benguela, Belize, Lobito and Tomboco fields.

Block 14K (36.75%) corresponds to the offshore unitization zone between Angola (Block 14) and the Republic of Congo (Haute Mer license). The development of the Lianzi field, which was started in 2012, will be achieved by means of a connection to the existing BBLT platform (Block 14). Production start-up is planned for 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized block is held 10% through Angola Block 14 BV and 26.75% through Total E&P Congo.

On Block 0 (10%), the development of Mafumeira Sul was approved by the partners and the authorities in 2012. This project constitutes the second phase of the development of the Mafumeira field. Production start-up is planned for 2016.

On Block 15/06 (15%), the development of a first production hub, including the discoveries located in the northwest portion of the block, began in early 2012. In February 2014, TOTAL signed an agreement to sell its entire interest in Block 15/06. The closing of this transaction is expected to take place during the first half of 2014.

TOTAL has operations on exploration Blocks 33 (58.67%, operator), 17/06 (30%, operator), 25 (35%, operator), 39 (15%) and 40 (50%, operator). The Group plans to drill pre-salt targets in Blocks 25, 39 and 40 in 2014 in the deep offshore Kwanza basin. TOTAL signed a disposal agreement to reduce its interest in Block 40 to 40%. The closing of this transaction is expected to take place during the first half of 2014.

TOTAL is also developing its LNG activities through the Angola LNG project (13.6%), which includes a gas liquefaction plant near Soyo supplied in particular by the gas associated with production from Blocks 0, 14, 15, 17 and 18. LNG production started in June 2013 but, due to various incidents, the plant has not yet reached full capacity (5.2 Mt/y).

InCameroon, TOTAL no longer holds any exploration or production assets since the sale of its subsidiary Total E&P Cameroun in 2011. Production was 3 kboe/d in 2011.

InCôte d’Ivoire, TOTAL is active in four deep offshore exploration licenses located 50 km to 100 km from the coast and covering approximately 5,200 km2 at water depths ranging from 1,000 m to 3,000 m.

TOTAL is the operator of the CI-100 (60%) license in the Tano basin and holds stakes in the CI-514 (54%, operator), CI-515 (45%) and CI-516 (45%) licenses in the San Pedro basin.

A comprehensive 3D seismic survey has been conducted on the CI-100 license and a first exploration well (Ivoire-1X) was drilled in early 2013 in the northwest portion of the block at a water depth of more than 2,300 m. This well has encountered a good-quality oil horizon. The recorded data is currently undergoing analysis in order to assess the potential of the discovered reservoirs and define an exploration and additional works program.

A 3D seismic survey campaign covering the whole of the three licenses CI-514, CI-515 and CI-516 was completed in December 2012. The interpretation of the data is ongoing.

Following the drilling of a first exploration well on license CI-514, two more wells are due to be drilled on licenses CI-515 and CI-516 during the course of 2014.

InEgypt, TOTAL is the operator of Block 4 (East El Burullus Offshore) and reduced its stake in this license from 90% to 50% in January 2013. The license, located in the Nile river basin, covers a 4-year initial exploration period and includes a commitment to carrying out 3D seismic work and drilling exploration wells. Following the 3D seismic campaign covering 3,374 km2 that was conducted in 2011, an exploration well (Kala-1) was drilled in late 2013, whose results have been disappointing.

InGabon, the Group’s production in 2013 was 59 kboe/d compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 58 kboe/d in 2011. The Group’s exploration and production activities in Gabon are mainly carried out by Total Gabon(2), one of the Group’s oldest subsidiaries in sub-Saharan Africa.

As part of the Anguille field redevelopment project (estimated production capacity of 20 kboe/d), the AGM North platform, from which twenty-one additional development wells are expected to be drilled, was installed in 2012. Production started as planned with two wells in March 2013.

On the deep-offshore Diaba license, the operator Total Gabon sold off part of its interest in 2012 and now has a stake of 42.5%. An initial exploration well (Diaman-1B) was drilled during 2013 at a water depth of more than 1,700 m. This well revealed an accumulation of gas and condensates in the pre-salt reservoirs of the Gamba Formation. Data analysis is currently underway in order to assess this discovery and reassess the surrounding prospects.

The Nguongui-updip well was drilled on the Mutamba-Iroru license (50%) in 2012 and revealed the presence of hydrocarbons. Work is currently being conducted to evaluate the commercial viability of this discovery. A 2D seismic survey was conducted on the Nziembou license (20%) in 2012. Drilling preparation activities are being conducted for a first exploration well scheduled in 2014.

InKenya, TOTAL acquired a 40% stake in five offshore licenses in the Lamu basin in 2011, namely licenses L5, L7, L11a, L11b and L12, representing a total surface area of more than 30,600 km2 at water depths of between 100 m and 3,000 m. Following the 3D

(1)

Interest held by the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%, INPEX Corporation 49.99% since February 2013).

(2) 

Total Gabon is a Gabonese company listed on Euronext Paris. The Group holds 58.28%, the Republic of Gabon holds 25% and the public float is 16.72%.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.17


Item 4 - Business Overview

seismic survey campaign covering 3,500 km2 that was conducted during the initial exploration period, 25% of the surface area of the five blocks was relinquished. In 2013, two exploration wells were drilled in Blocks L7 and L11b, but did not result in positive results. In 2012, the Group also acquired the L22 offshore license (100%, operator), located in the same basin and covering a surface area of more than 10,000 km2 in water depths ranging from 2,000 m to 3,500 m. In December 2013, TOTAL sold 30% of its stake in this license. A 2D seismic survey and sea core drilling operations are planned for 2014 on the L22 offshore license.

InLibya, the Group’s production in 2013 was 50 kb/d compared to 62 kb/d in 2012 and 20 kb/d in 2011. TOTAL is a partner in the following contract zones: 15, 16 & 32 (75%(1)), 70 & 87 (75%(1)), 129 & 130 (30%(1)) and 130 & 131 (24%(1) and Block NC191 (100%(1), operator).

Production which, in 2012, had returned to its level prior to the events of 2011 was affected from mid-2013 onward by the blockade of most of the country’s terminals and pipelines due to social and political unrest.

In onshore zones 70 and 87 (Mabruk), production has been affected since August 2013 due to the blockade of the Es Sider export terminal. Development of the Garian field was approved in July 2013 and production at the field is expected to start in the third quarter 2014.

In onshore zones 129, 130 and 131, production was stopped in 2013 during several months due to the blocking of the production installation and the evacuation pipeline. The seismic survey campaign, which was interrupted in 2011 due to force majeure, has not yet resumed. However, the exploration of these blocks continued in 2013 with the drilling of three wells.

In the onshore Murzuk basin, a plan for the development of Block NC 191 was submitted to the authorities in 2009. Discussions have resumed following the interruptions associated with the events of 2011.

In offshore zones 15, 16 and 32 (Al Jurf), production has not been affected by the social unrest in the country. The drilling of two exploration wells scheduled for the second quarter of 2013 was postponed due to technical reasons. The first of these wells was started at the end of 2013.

InMadagascar, TOTAL is active on the Bemolanga 3102 license (60%, operator). Since the exploitation of oil sand accumulations is no longer planned, TOTAL is refocusing on the conventional exploration of the block, which is expected to continue in 2014 with a 2D seismic survey following the approval of an additional2-year extension of the exploration phase by the local authorities.

InMorocco, the Anzarane offshore reconnaissance contract covering an offshore zone of 100,000 km2, which was granted in December 2011 to TOTAL and ONHYM (National Bureau of Petroleum and Mines), was extended for one year in December 2013. A 3D seismic survey campaign covering 5,900 km2 that started in late 2012 was completed in July 2013. The collected data is currently being processed.

InMauritania, the Group has exploration operations on the Ta7 and Ta8 licenses (60%, operator) located in the Taoudenni basin. In 2012, TOTAL acquired interests in two exploration licenses

(90%, operator): Block C9 in ultra-deep offshore, and Block Ta29 onshore in the Taoudenni basin. During 2013, TOTAL sold 18% of its stake in Block Ta29, but retains operatorship and a 72% interest.

Following a 2D seismic survey performed in 2011 on license Ta7, well Ta7-1 was drilled in 2013. Tests have been conducted, but they did not allow to highlight hydrocarbons in commercial quantity.

On Block Ta29, a 900 km2 seismic was performed in 2012. The processing and the interpretation of these seismic data have been completed. Studies are underway to identify a prospect on this block.

A 3D seismic survey campaign covering 4,700 km2 was conducted on Block C9 in 2013. The data is currently being processed and interpreted.

InMozambique, TOTAL acquired in 2012 a 40% stake in the production sharing contract regarding offshore Blocks 3 and 6. Located in the Rovuma basin, these two blocks cover a total surface area of 15,250 km² in water depths ranging from 0 m to 2,500 m. An exploration well was drilled in 2012 and half of the surface area of the two blocks was relinquished in 2013 at the start of the second exploration period.

InNigeria, Group production in 2013 was 261 kboe/d compared to 279 kboe/d in 2012 and 287 kboe/d in 2011. These declines are primarily due to the sharp increase in oil bunkering and in 2013 the blockade of Nigeria LNG export cargos. Despite such factors negatively affecting production, Nigeria remained the main contributor to the Group’s production.

TOTAL, which has been present in the country since 1962, operates six production licenses (OML) out of the thirty-eight in which it has a stake, and one out of the four exploration licenses (OPL) in which it is present.

Regarding variations in TOTAL’s licenses:

In September 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the authorities to increase its stake in exploration license OPL 285 from 26.67% to 60%. In May 2013, TOTAL obtained the approval of the authorities for the renewal of licenses OML 99, 100 and 102 for a period of twenty years.

On the OML 138 license (20%), TOTAL started production in the Usan offshore field in 2012 (180 kb/d, FPSO capacity), which reached the level of 130 kboe/d in 2013. Since February 2014, TOTAL is no longer the operator of the OML 138 license. In 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement for the sale of its 20% stake in Block OML 138. The approval by the authorities has not yet been received.

TOTAL decided not to continue its exploration activities in JDZ Block 1 (48.6%, operator) following the analysis of the results of wells drilled in 2012. Block was relinquished in September 2013. Also, the Block OPL 221 was relinquished in November 2013.

TOTAL sold its 10% stake in Blocks OML 26 and 42 in 2011 and in Blocks OML 30, 34 and 40 in 2012. These interests had previously been indirectly controlled via the joint venture Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC).

(1) 

TOTAL’s stake in the foreign consortium.

18TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

TOTAL continues, with its developments, to meet the growing domestic demand for gas and to strengthen its ability to supply gas to the LNG projects in which it owns a stake:

As part of its joint venture with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), TOTAL is pursuing the project to increase the gas production capacity of the OML 58 license (40%, operator) from 370 Mcf/d to 550 Mcf/d.

On the OML 102 license (40%, operator), TOTAL is continuing to develop the Ofon phase 2 project, which was launched in 2011, with an expected capacity of 70 kboe/d and production start-up is scheduled for the end of 2014. In 2011, the Group also discovered Etisong North, located 15 km from the currently-producing Ofon field. The exploration campaign continued in 2012 with the drilling of the Eben well, which is also south of Ofon. The positive results produced by this well further enhance the interest of the future Etisong-Eben development hub as a satellite of the Ofon field.

On the OML 130 license (24%, operator), the development of the Egina field (capacity of 200 kboe/d) was launched in June 2013 and contracts have been awarded. Production start-up is expected at year-end 2017.

On the OML 99 license (40%, operator), engineering work is underway to develop the Ikike field, where production is expected to start in 2017 (estimated capacity of 55 kboe/d).

On the OML 112/117 licenses (40%), development studies have been suspended waiting for the resolution of contractual issues that arose in 2013

TOTAL is also active in the LNG sector with a 15% holding in the company Nigeria LNG, which possesses a liquefaction plant of a total capacity of 22 Mt/y. In addition, TOTAL holds a 17% stake in Brass LNG, which is continuing to study the project for a gas liquefaction plant with two LNG trains of a capacity of 5 Mt/y each.

The production that is not operated by the Group in Nigeria comes mainly from the SPDC joint venture, in which TOTAL holds a 10% stake. The sharp increase of oil bunkering in 2013 had an impact on onshore production, as well as on the integrity of the facilities and the local environment.

In addition, TOTAL also holds a 12.5% stake in the OML 118 deep-offshore license. In connection with this license, the Bonga field contributed 15 kboe/d to Group production in 2013. The partners continued the development of the Bonga Northwest project in 2013. On the OML 118 license, a pre-unitization agreement relating to the Bonga South West discovery has been signed in December 2013.

InUganda, TOTAL has been active since 2012 and holds a 33.33% interest in the EA-1, EA-1A and EA-2 licenses as well as the Kingfisher license. All of these licenses are located in the Lake Albert region, where oil resources have already been discovered. TOTAL is the operator of licenses EA-1 and EA-1A and a partner on the other licenses.

On the appraisal license EA-1, a campaign of wells, production tests and a 3D seismic survey are underway. Five development plans will be submitted to the authorities before the end of 2014: Ngiri (submitted in December 2013), Jobi-Rii (April 2014), and Mpyo, Gunya and Jobi East (December 2014).

The EA-1A license expired in February 2013, following a campaign involving the drilling of five exploration wells that resulted in one discovery (Lyec). With the exception of the scope relating to this discovery, the license has been returned to the authorities.

On the appraisal license EA-2, the campaign of wells and production tests started in 2012 continued during 2013. An additional well is due to be drilled in 2014. Two development plans were submitted to the authorities in June 2013 (Kasamene and Wahrindi fields, as well as those of Kigogole, Ngege, Ngara and Nsoga).

The development plan for the Kingfisher field, which is located on the EA-3 production license, was approved by the authorities in September 2013. The basic engineering studies are currently being prepared.

The Kanywataba exploration well was drilled in June 2012 with negative results. The Kanywataba license expired in August 2012 and was returned to the authorities.

At the initiative of the Ugandan government, discussions are underway concerning the construction of a refinery that will be developed in two phases (30 kb/d in the first phase followed by a second phase providing an additional 30 kb/d), as well as an export pipeline.

In theRepublic of Congo, the Group’s production in 2013 was 93 kboe/d compared to 113 kboe/d in 2012 and 123 kboe/d in 2011. The decrease in production was due in particular to the end of plateau production at Moho Bilondo in mid-2010 and to a planned shut-down on the Nkossa field.

The development of the Lianzi field was approved in 2012. Located in the offshore unitization zone Block 14K (36.75%) between Angola and the Republic of Congo (Haute Mer license), this field will be developed by a tieback to the existing Benguela-Belize-Lobito-Tomboco platform (Block 14 in Angola). Production start-up is expected in 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized block is held 26.75% through Total E&P Congo and 10% through Angola Block 14 BV.

The Moho Bilondo offshore field (53.5%, operator) reached plateau production of 90 kboe/d in mid-2010. The field has now started its decline. The Phase 1b and Moho North projects were launched in March 2013 following agreements on the contractual and fiscal conditions in 2012. Production start-up is planned for 2015 and 2016, respectively, with estimated production capacity of 140 kboe/d (40 kboe/d for Phase 1b and 100 kboe/d for Moho North).

Production at Libondo (65%, operator), which is part of the Kombi-Likalala-Libondo operating license, started in 2011. Plateau production reached 12 kboe/d in 2011.

In July 2013, TOTAL obtained the Haute Mer B license (34.62%, operator) in association with other partners.

As part of the renewal of the Loango and Zatchi licenses, an agreement on the related contractual and fiscal conditions was signed in October 2013. This agreement is subject to approval by the parliament. TOTAL’s interest in these licenses will change respectively from 50% to 42.50% for Loango and from 35% to 29.75% for Zatchi with retroactive effect in October 2013.

In December 2013, in connection with a share capital increase of Total E&P Congo, Qatar Petroleum International Upstream (QPI) entered into the share capital of this subsidiary at a level of 15%.

In theDemocratic Republic of the Congo, following the Presidential decree approving TOTAL’s entry in 2011 as operator with a 60% interest in Block III of the Graben Albertine, the exploration permit was issued in January 2012 by the Minister of Hydrocarbons for a period of three years and subsequently extended by an additional year due to the postponement of the works in light of the general security situation in the eastern part of

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.19


Item 4 - Business Overview

the country. This block is located in the Lake Albert region. TOTAL acquired an additional 6.66% of this block in March 2012. The prospecting program is limited to the northern portion of the license, which is outside the Virunga park. A helicopter acquisition of gravimetric and magnetic data was completed in August 2012 with encouraging results. The 2D seismic survey campaign prepared in 2013 is scheduled to start in 2014.

In theRepublic of South Sudan, TOTAL is negotiating a new contract with the state authorities that would make it possible to resume exploration activities in part of Block B. Since the independence of the Republic of South Sudan on July 9, 2011, TOTAL is no longer present in Sudan.

North America

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in North America was 73 kboe/d, representing 3% of the Group’s total production, compared to 69 kboe/d in 2012 and 67 kboe/d in 2011.

InCanada, the Group’s production in 2013 was 13 kboe/d compared to 12 kboe/d in 2012 and 11 kboe/d in 2011. The Group’s oil sands portfolio is focused around two main hubs: on the one hand, a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) hub focused on continuing developments at Surmont’s (50%), and, on the other, a mining hub, which includes the Joslyn (38.25%, operator), Fort Hills (39.2%) and Northern Lights (50%, operator) mining projects as well as a 100% stake in a number of oil sands leases acquired through a series of auction sales.

On the Surmont lease, additional wells were drilled in 2013 in order to optimize production. The decision to construct an additional steam generation unit was also made with the same aim in mind. The drilling of additional wells is expected to continue in 2014.

In early 2010, the partners involved in the project decided to launch the construction of the second development phase. The goal of production start-up from Surmont Phase 2 has been set for 2015 and overall production capacity from the field is expected to increase to 130 kboe/d.

On the Fort Hills project (production capacity estimated at 180 kb/d), the final investment decision was made in October 2013. Site preparation work is underway and production start-up is planned for the end of 2017.

On the Joslyn license, engineering studies are currently being conducted in order to optimize production from the Joslyn North Mine project.

In March 2013, TOTAL concluded an agreement for the sale of its 49% stake in the Voyageurupgraderproject.

In theUnited States, the Group’s production in 2013 was 60 kboe/d compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 56 kboe/d in 2011.

In the Gulf of Mexico:

Phase 2 of the deep-offshore Tahiti oil field (17%) was launched in 2010. This phase comprises drilling four injection wells and two producing wells. The injection of water depths ranging from 200started in 2012. The first producing well was put into operation in late 2013 and the second producing well, the drilling of which is currently being completed, is due to 3,000 m.start production in 2014.

Located around 170 km northeast off Cayenne,The Chinook 4 well in the deep-offshore Chinook project (33.33%) started production in the third quarter of 2012.

Drilling of the Chinook 5 well was completed in 2013 and started production in early 2014.

The TOTAL (40%) — Cobalt (60%, operator) alliance’s exploratory drilling campaign, which was launched in 2009, was resumed in 2012 after the U.S. government lifted the moratorium on deep-offshore drilling operations. This resulted in the drilling of the GM-ES-1Ligurian 2 well (dry well) together with the North Platte well at which a major oil discovery was made and for which studies are currently being conducted. The Ardennes well, which was drilled in 2013, gave disappointing results, just like the Aegean well, which was completed in December 2013. The Aegean well is the last one of the drilling campaign.

TOTAL is active in shale gas production in Texas and has a 25% stake in the Chesapeake portfolio in the Barnett Shale basin through its participation in a joint venture with Chesapeake. Given the drop in gas prices in the United States, drilling operations have been sharply reduced from 2012 onwards (approximately sixty wells drilled in 2013 compared to 100 in 2012 and more than 300 in 2011).

TOTAL is also active in the production of shale gas in Ohio and has a 25% stake in the liquid-rich Utica shale gas play through a joint venture with Chesapeake and EnerVest. More than 200 liquids-rich gas wells were drilled in 2013 (compared to approximately 100 in 2012) and approximately 190 of these have been connected and started producing (compared to forty-seven in 2012).

Engineers from TOTAL are assigned to the teams led by Chesapeake.

The Group holds a 50% stake in American Shale Oil LLC (AMSO) to developin situ shale oil technology. The firstin situ heating tests have been performed and are resulting in adaptations to the selected technology.

In 2012, TOTAL entered into a 50/50 association with Red Leaf Resources for the ex-situ development of oil shale and agreed to fund a production pilot before any larger-scale development. In addition, TOTAL finalized an agreement to purchase approximately 120 km2 of additional land in Colorado and Utah, with a view to developingin situ shale oil techniques (AMSO technique) orex-situ techniques (Red Leaf technique).

InMexico, TOTAL is conducting various studies with state-owned PEMEX under a general technical cooperation agreement renewed in July 2011 for a period of five years.

South America

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in South America was 166 kboe/d, representing 7% of the Group’s total production, compared to 182 kboe/d in 2012 and 188 kboe/d in 2011.

InArgentina, where TOTAL has been present since 1978, the Group operated about 30%(1) of the country’s production in 2013. The Group’s production in 2013 was 78 kboe/d compared to 83 kboe/d in 2012 and 86 kboe/d in 2011. In order to encourage investment in exploration and production, the Argentinean government has concluded gas price agreements with various producers as of December 2012. Under the terms of these agreements, the Argentinean government guarantees the price of gas for quantities above a fixed production level in exchange for

(1)

Source: Argentinean Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services — Energy Secretary.

20TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

compliance with defined production targets and applicable penalties (i.e., “Deliver or Pay”). In February 2013, TOTAL signed an agreement of this type for a period of five years with retroactive effect from December 1, 2012.

In Tierra del Fuego, the Group notably operates the Carina and Aries offshore fields (37.5%). Following the re-appraisal of the reserves of the Carina field, three additional wells are expected to be drilled from the existing platform. These wells should allow production levels from the facilities operated by the Group in Tierra del Fuego to be maintained at about 630 Mcf/d until the Vega Pleyade field (37.5%, operator) starts up in 2015. Development of this field started in October 2013.

In the Neuquén basin, TOTAL started a drilling campaign on its mining licenses in 2011 in order to assess their shale gas and oil potential. In 2012 and 2013, this campaign, which started on the Aguada Pichana license (27.3%, operator), was extended to all the blocks operated by the Group: San Roque (24.7%, operator), Rincón la Ceniza and La Escalonada (85%, operator), Aguada de Castro (42.5%, operator), and Pampa de las Yeguas II (42.5%, operator), as well as to the blocks operated by third parties: Cerro Las Minas (40%), Cerro Partido (45%), Rincón de Aranda (45%), and Veta Escondida (45%). The first results, all positive, of the production tests on the wells drilled during this campaign permit envisaging various development scenarios in the region. A pilot development intended to test the unconventional production potential at the Aguada Pichana Block is expected to enter into production in late 2014.

InBolivia, the Group’s production, primarily gas, was 28 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 27 kboe/d in 2012 and 25 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL has stakes in seven licenses: three production licenses, San Alberto and San Antonio (15%) and Block XX Tarija Oeste (41%), two licenses in the development phase, Aquio and Ipati (60%, operator), and two licenses in the exploration or appraisal phase, Rio Hondo (50%) and Azero (50%, operator).

Production started in 2011 on the Zaedyus prospect took place in 2011. The well was drilled at water depths of over 2,000 m and reached a vertical depth of 5,908 m below sea level. It revealed two hydrocarbon columns in gravelly reservoirs.

This discovery follows on from the shooting of a 3D seismic survey covering 2,500 km2 on the eastern zone of the Guyane Maritime license.

An extensive drilling campaign and a further 3D seismic survey are planned on the license starting in 2012.

InTrinidad & Tobago, where TOTAL has had operations since 1996, the Group’s production was 12 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 3 kboe/d in 2010 and 5 kboe/d in 2009. TOTAL holds a 30% stake in the offshore Angostura

field located on Block 2C. Production started up in May 2011 on Phase 2, which corresponds to the gas reserves development phase. A drilling campaign on three wells started in mid-2011 in order to increase oil production. An exploration well was also drilled in 2011 and revealed additional gas resources.

In Venezuela, where TOTAL has had operations since 1980, the Group’s production was 54 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 55 kboe/d in 2010 and 54 kboe/d in 2009. TOTAL has equity stakes in PetroCedeño (30.323%), which produces and upgrades extra heavy oil in the Orinoco Belt, in Yucal Placer (69.5%), which produces gas dedicated to the domestic market, and in the offshore exploration Block 4, located in the Plataforma Deltana (49%).

The development phase of the southern portion of the PetroCedeño field was launched in the second half of 2011.

An additional development phase on the Yucal Placer field to increase production capacity from 100 Mcf/d to 300 Mcf/d is under discussion with the authorities.

Asia-Pacific

In 2011, TOTAL’s production in Asia-Pacific was 231 kboe/d, representing 10% of the Group’s overall production, compared to 248 kboe/d in 2010 and 251 kboe/d in 2009.

InAustralia, where TOTAL has held leasehold rights since 2005, the Group owns 24% of the Ichthys project, 27.5% of the GLNG project and nine offshore exploration licenses, including four that it operates, off the northwest coast in the Browse, Vulcan and Bonaparte Basins. In 2011, the Group produced 4 kboe/d due to its stake in GLNG, compared to 1 kboe/d in 2010.

The Ichthys LNG project is aimed at the development of the IchthysItaú gas and condensates field located inon Block XX Tarija Oeste; it is routed to the Browse Basin. This development includes a floating platform designed for gas production, treatment and export, an FPSO to stabilize and export condensates, an 889 km gas pipeline and an onshore liquefaction plant located in Darwin. The project was launched in early 2012 following completionexisting facilities of the engineering studies, calls for tenderneighboring San Alberto field. Phase 2 of the development of the field entered into production at the end of 2013.

In 2004, TOTAL discovered the Incahuasi gas field on the Ipati Block. In 2011 and subcontractor selection. The LNG has already been sold under long-term contracts mainly to Asian buyers.

Production capacity is expected to be 8.4 Mt/y2013, two additional wells confirmed the extension of LNG and nearly 1.6 Mt/y of LPGthe discovery northwards onto the adjacent Aquio Block as well as southwards onto the Ipati license. In April 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the authorities to start development of Phase 1 of the project, including the connection of three existing wells to a productioncentral processing plant of 100 kb/d6.5 Mm3/d. The key contracts relating to the construction of condensates at peak. Production start-upthe plant and its connection to the export network were granted in October 2013. In July 2013, TOTAL sold 20% stakes in the Aquio and Ipati fields thereby reducing its interest in these fields from 80 to 60%.

In August 2013, TOTAL acquired a 50% stake in the Azero exploration license in the Andean Piedmont. This is expected at year-end 2016.located to the west of the Ipati and Aquio Blocks and covers an area of more than 7,800 km2.

InBrazil, the Group has stakes in fourteen exploration licenses.

 

In late 2010,October 2013, TOTAL acquired a 20% stake in the GLNG project, followed by an additional 7.5% stake in

March 2011. This integrated gas production, transport and liquefaction project is based on the development of coal gas from the Fairview, Roma, Scotia and Arcadia fields. The final investment decision was made in January 2011 and start-up is expected in 2015. LNG production is expected to eventually reach 7.2 Mt/y. The preliminary project development and engineering work are continuing. The 420 km pipeline for transporting the gas has received environmental approval. Off the coast near Gladstone, on Curtis Island, site preparations have started with civil engineering, dredging and construction of the initial jetty and the residential compound.

Following extensive seismic surveying in 2008Libra field. This field is currently being assessed and interpretation ofis the data in 2009, a drilling campaign on two wells started in early 2011 on license WA-403 (60%, operator). As one well demonstrated the presence of hydrocarbons, additional appraisal work will take place on this block (3D seismic).

Three new exploration wells are planned for 2012/2013 on license WA-408 (100%, operator).

In Brunei, where TOTAL has been present since 1986, the Group operates the offshore Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam gas and condensateslargest pre-salt oil field located on Block B (37.5%). The Group’s production was 13 kboe/d in 2011, compareddiscovered to 14 kboe/d in 2010 and 12 kboe/d in 2009. The gas is delivered to the Brunei LNG liquefaction plant.

On Block B, the drilling campaign that started in 2009 continued in 2010 and 2011. Production on the first well started in 2010. The next two wells, which were exploratory, revealed new reservesdate in the southern portionSantos basin off the coast of Brazil. The field is located in very deep water (2,000 m) approximately 170 km off the coast of Rio de Janeiro and covers an area of 1,550 km2. Additional

exploration works including contractual obligations to be realized by the end of 2017 and appraisal and development studies of the field for which development studies are underway. A fourth well drilled in 2011 in the southern portion of the field was connected to the production facilities at the end of the year. A ten-year extension of the mining rights period was recently granted by the Brunei government.were launched.

On deep-offshore exploration Block CA1 (54%, operator), formerly Block J, exploration operations that had been suspended since May 2003 due to a border dispute between Brunei and Malaysia resumed

Following the eleventh call for tender organized by the Brazilian authorities in May 2013, TOTAL acquired a stake in ten new operating licenses. Holding a 40% stake, the Group operates five blocks (FZA-M-57, FZA-M-86, FZA-M-88, FZA-M-125 and FZA-M-127) located in the Foz do Amazonas basin and has a 45% interest in a block (CE-M-661) located in the Ceara basin. TOTAL also has a 25% stake in three blocks (ES-M-669, ES-M-671 and ES-M-743) located in the Espirito Santo basin and a 50% share in another block (BAR-M-346) located in the Barreirinhas basin.

TOTAL also has a stake in the Xerelete field, which the Group has operated since 2012. This stake is primarily located on Block BC-2 (41.2%) and extends into Block BM-C-14 (50%). The drilling of a well targeting pre-salt horizons was launched at the beginning of January 2014.

A well was drilled in 2012 in the Gato Do Mato field, which is located in Block BM-S-54 (20%) and was discovered in the Santos basin in 2010. The encouraging results are currently being analyzed in order to define the next stages in the assessment of the field.

InColombia, TOTAL no longer has production since the sale in 2012 of one of its subsidiaries, TEPMA BV, which held a stake in the Cusiana field. Production was 6 kboe/d in 2012 and 11 kboe/d in September 2010. A seismic survey started before the summer of 2011 and an initial campaign of three drillings started in October 2011.

Following the discovery of Huron-1 on the Niscota (50%) license in 2009 and the drilling of the second well, Huron-2, which yielded positive test results in April 2013, a third well, Huron-3, was drilled with disappointing results. The conceptual development studies have started for a declaration of commerciality that is expected during the second quarter of 2014.

After selling 10% of its stake in the Ocensa pipeline in 2011 and reducing its interest in this asset to 5.2%, TOTAL sold its entire stake in 2013, but kept its transport rights. TOTAL has relinquished its stakes in the OAM and ODC pipelines that were previously held by TEPMA BV.

InChina, the Group has had operations since 2006 on the South Sulige Block, located in the Ordos Basin in the Inner Mongolia province. Following appraisal work by TOTAL, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and TOTAL agreed in November 2010 to submit to the authorities for approval a development plan under which CNPC is the operator and provides the benefit of its experience in

developing Great Sulige. TOTAL has a 49% stake and provides support in its areas of expertise.

The authorities gave the operator permission to undertake preliminary development work in the spring of 2011. Drilling operations started and additional 3D seismic data was shot in 2011 in preparation for the upcoming drilling campaigns. Start-up of production is expected in 2012.

InIndonesia, where TOTAL has had operations since 1968, the Group’s production was 158 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 178 kboe/d in 2010 and 190 kboe/d in 2009.

TOTAL’s operations in Indonesia are primarily concentrated on the Mahakam permit (50%, operator), which covers in particular the Peciko and Tunu gas fields. TOTAL also has a stake in the Sisi-Nubi gas field (47.9%, operator). TOTAL delivers most of its natural gas production to the Bontang LNG plant operated by the Indonesian company PT Badak. The overall capacity of the eight liquefaction trains of the Bontang plant is 22 Mt/y.

In 2011, gas production operated by TOTAL amounted to 2,227 Mcf/d. The gas operated and delivered by TOTAL accounted for nearly 80% of Bontang LNG’s supply. In addition to gas production, operated condensates and oil production from the Handil and Bekapai fields amounted to 59 kb/d and 23 kb/d, respectively.

On the Mahakam permit:

In 2011, the scheduled drilling of additional wells in the main reservoir of the Tunu field continued with increasing density. The second phase of drilling development wells to discover shallow gas reservoirs has started.

On the Peciko field, Phase 7 drilling, which started in 2009, is continuing.

The development of South Mahakam, which includes the Stupa, West Stupa and East Mandu fields, is ongoing. Start-up of production is expected in early 2013.

On the Sisi-Nubi field, which began production in 2007, drilling operations continue within the framework of a second phase of development. The gas from Sisi-Nubi is produced through Tunu’s processing facilities.

In October 2010, TOTAL closed the acquisition of a 15% stake in the Sebuku permit, where the gas field Ruby was discovered. Development of the field, with the aim of producing 100 Mcf/d of natural gas, started in February 2011. Production start-up is scheduled for the end of 2013.

On the Southeast Mahakam exploration block (50%, operator), the first exploration well (Trekulu 1) completed at the end of 2010 produced negative results.

In May 2010, the Group acquired a 24.5% stake in two exploration blocks — Arafura and Amborip VI — located in the Arafura Sea. Two wells were drilled on these blocks in late 2010/early 2011. The results were negative.

In September 2011, TOTAL signed an agreement to acquire a stake in three exploration blocks located in the southern Makassar Strait (Sageri, 50%, South Sageri, 35% and Sadang, 20%). A first well was drilled on the Sageri block at the end of 2011.

In September 2011, TOTAL also signed an agreement to acquire a stake in an exploration block located in the southern Makassar Strait (South Mandar, 33%). Under the agreement, the Group acquired additional 10% stakes in the South Sageri and Sadang blocks.

In May 2011, TOTAL acquired a 100% stake in the South West Bird’s Head exploration block. The block is located onshore and offshore in the Salawati Basin, in the province of West Papua.

The Group signed a production sharing agreement in March 2011, for a 50% stake in a coal bed methane (CBM) field on the Kutai Timur Block in East Kalimantan province.

In the autumn of 2010, the Group signed an agreement with the consortium Nusantara Regas (Pertamina-PGN) for the delivery of 11.75 Mt of LNG over the period 2012-2022 to a re-gasification terminal located near Jakarta. The first deliveries are expected in the second quarter of 2012.

InMalaysia, TOTAL signed a production sharing agreement in 2008 with state-owned Petronas for the offshore exploration Blocks PM303 and PM324. Following the seismic studies performed in 2009 and 2010, TOTAL withdrew from offshore exploration Block PM303 in early 2011. Exploration work continued on Block PM324 (50%, operator); initial drilling in high pressure/high temperature conditions started in October 2011 and continues in 2012.

TOTAL also signed in November 2010 a new production sharing agreement with Petronas for the deep offshore exploration Block SK 317 B (85%, operator) located off the state of Sarawak. 3D seismic surveys have been carried out on the zone. The results should be available shortly.

InMyanmar, the Group’s production was 15 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 14 kboe/d in 2010 and 13 kboe/d in 2009. TOTAL operates the Yadana field (31.2%), located on offshore Blocks M5 and M6, which produces gas that is delivered primarily to PTT (the Thai state-owned company) to be used in Thai power plants. The Yadana field also supplies the domestic market via a land pipeline and, since June 2010, via a sub-sea pipeline built and operated by Myanmar’s state-owned company MOGE.

InThailand, the Group’s production was 41 kboe/d in 2011 and 2010, compared to and 36 kboe/d in 2009. This comes from the Bongkot (33.33%) offshore gas and condensates field. PTT purchases all of the natural gas and condensates production.

On the northern portion of the Bongkot field, the 3H (three wellhead platforms) development phase came onstream in early 2011. New investments are being made to meet gas demand and maintain plateau production:

phase 3J (two well platforms) was launched in late 2010 with start-up scheduled for 2012;

phase 3K (two well platforms) was approved in September 2011 with start-up scheduled for 2013; and

the second low-pressure compressor installation phase to increase gas production was completed in the first quarter of 2012.

The southern portion of the field (Greater Bongkot South) is also being developed in several phases. This development is designed to include a processing platform, a residential platform and thirteen production platforms. Construction of the facilities started in 2009 and accelerated in 2011 with the installation of the residential and gas processing platforms in August. Production is expected to start in the spring of 2012, with a capacity of 350 Mcf/d.

InVietnam, TOTAL holds a 35% stake in the production sharing agreement for the offshore 15-1/05 exploration block following an agreement signed in 2007 with PetroVietnam. Two oil discoveries were made on the southern portion of the block, one in November 2009 and the other in October 2010. The results from the additional wells drilled on these discoveries between November 2010 and October 2011 are being assessed.

In 2009, TOTAL and PetroVietnam signed a production sharing agreement for Blocks DBSCL-02 and DBSCL-03. The onshore blocks, located in the Mekong Delta region, are held by TOTAL (75%, operator) and PetroVietnam (25%). Based on the seismic information obtained in 2009 and 2010, the partners have decided not to continue the exploration work.

Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)

In 2011, TOTAL’s production in the CIS was 119 kboe/d, representing 5% of the Group’s overall production, compared to 23 kboe/d in 2010 and 24 kboe/d in 2009.

InAzerbaijan, where TOTAL has had operations since 1996, production was 14 kboe/d in 2011, compared to

13 kboe/d in 2010 and 12 kboe/d in 2009. The Group’s production comes from the Shah Deniz field (10%). TOTAL also holds a 10% stake in South Caucasus Pipeline Company, owner of the South Caucasus Pipeline (SCP) gas pipeline that transports the gas produced in Shah Deniz to the Turkish and Georgian markets. TOTAL also holds a 5% stake in BTC Co., owner of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline, which connects Baku and the Mediterranean Sea. In 2009, TOTAL and state-owned SOCAR signed an exploration, development and production sharing agreement for a license located on the Absheron block in the Caspian Sea. TOTAL (40%) is the operator during the exploration phase and a joint operating company will manage operations during the development phase. Drilling of an exploratory well started in early 2011. In September 2011, the well showed the existence of a substantial gas accumulation. The well will be tested in 2012.

Gas deliveries to Turkey and Georgia from the Shah Deniz field continued throughout 2011, at a lower pace for Turkey due to weaker demand than initially forecast. Conversely, SOCAR took greater quantities of gas than provided for by the agreement.

Development studies and business negotiations for the sale of additional gas needed to launch a second development phase in Shah Deniz continued in 2011. In October 2011, SOCAR and Botas, a Turkish state-owned company, signed an agreement on the sale of additional gas volumes and the transfer conditions for volumes intended for the European market. The agreement is expected to enable the start of FEED studies for this second phase in the first quarter of 2012, although some of the commercial provisions of the agreement have yet to be finalized.

InKazakhstan, TOTAL has owned since 1992 a stake in the North Caspian license, which covers the Kashagan field in particular.

The Kashagan project is expected to be developed in several phases. The development plan for the first phase (300 kb/d) was approved in February 2004 by the Kazakh authorities, allowing work to begin on the field. The consortium continues to target first production by year-end 2012.

In October 2008, the members of the North Caspian Sea Production Sharing Agreement (NCSPSA) consortium and the Kazakh authorities signed agreements to end the disagreement that began in August 2007. Their implementation led to a reduction of TOTAL’s share in NCSPSA from 18.52% to 16.81%. The operating structure was reconfigured and the North Caspian Operating Company (NCOC), a joint operating company, was entrusted with the operatorship in January 2009. NCOC supervises and coordinates NCSPSA’s operations.

InRussia, where TOTAL has had operations through its subsidiary since 1991, the Group’s production was 105 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 10 kboe/d in 2010 and 12 kboe/d in 2009. This comes from the Kharyaga field (40%, operator) and TOTAL’s stake in Novatek.

In 2007, TOTAL and Gazprom signed an agreement for the first phase of development on the giant Shtokman gas and condensates field, located in the Barents Sea. Under this agreement, Shtokman Development AG (TOTAL, 25%) was created in 2008 to design, build, finance and operate this first development phase, with estimated overall production capacity of 23.7 Bm3/y (0.4 Mboe/d). Engineering studies are underway for the portion of the project that will allow the transport of gas by pipeline through the Gazprom network (offshore development, gas pipeline and onshore gas and condensates processing facilities on the Teriberka site) and for the LNG part of the project, which will allow the export of 7.5 Mt/y of LNG from a new harbor located in Teriberka, representing approximately half of the gas produced by the first development phase.

In late 2009, TOTAL closed the acquisition from Novatek of a 49% stake in Terneftegas, which holds a development and production license on the onshore Termokarstovoye field. An appraisal well was drilled in 2010. The results of this well and of the pre-project studies allowed for the final investment decision to be made at year-end 2011.

On the Kharyaga field, work related to the development plan of phase 3 is ongoing. This development plan is intended to maintain plateau production at the 30 kboe/d (in 100%) level reached in late 2009. TOTAL sold 10% of the field to state-owned Zarubezhneft in January 2010, thereby decreasing its interest to 40%.

In the autumn of 2009, TOTAL signed an agreement setting forth the principles of a partnership with KazMunaiGas (KMG) for the development of the Khvalynskoye gas and condensates field, located offshore in the Caspian Sea on the border between Kazakhstan and Russia, under Russian jurisdiction. Gas production is expected to be transported to Russia. Pursuant to this agreement, TOTAL is planning to acquire 17% of KMG’s share.

In March 2011, TOTAL and the Russian listed company Novatek signed a strategic partnership agreement pursuant to which TOTAL acquired a 12.09% stake in Novatek in April 2011, with the intention of both parties for TOTAL to increase its

holding to 15% within 12 months and 19.40% within three years. In December 2011, TOTAL increased its stake in Novatek by 2% to 14.09%.

In October 2011, TOTAL and Novatek signed the final agreements for the joint development of the Yamal LNG project. With a 20% stake, TOTAL has become Novatek’s main international partner in the gas liquefaction project. Novatek, which will retain a 51% stake, intends to dispose of the remaining 29% to other partners. The Yamal LNG project covers the development of the South Tambey gas and condensates field, located on the Yamal Peninsula in the Arctic.

Europe

In 2011, TOTAL’s production in Europe was 512 kboe/d, representing 22% of the Group’s overall production, compared to 580 kboe/d in 2010 and 613 kboe/d in 2009.

InDenmark, TOTAL has owned since June 2010 an 80% stake in and the operatorship for licenses 1/10 (Nordjylland) and 2/10 (Nordsjaelland, formerly Frederoskilde). These onshore licenses, the shale gas potential of which has yet to be assessed, cover areas of 3,000 km2 and 2,300 km2, respectively. Following geoscience surveys on license 1/10 in 2011, the decision was made to drill a well during the second half of 2012. Geoscience surveys are ongoing on license 2/10.

InFrance, the Group’s production was 18 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 21 kboe/d in 2010 and 24 kboe/d in 2009. TOTAL’s major assets are the Lacq (100%) and Meillon (100%) gas fields, located in the southwest part of the country.

On the Lacq field, operated since 1957, a carbon capture and storage pilot was commissioned in January 2010, and carbon injection is expected to continue until 2013. In connection with this project, a boiler has been modified to operate in an oxy-fuel combustion environment and the carbon dioxide emitted is captured and re-injected in the depleted Rousse field. As part of TOTAL’s sustainable development policy, this project will allow the Group to assess one of the technological possibilities for reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

Agreements were signed in December 2011 for the sale of the Itteville, Vert-le-Grand, Vert-le-Petit, La Croix Blanche, Dommartin Lettrée and Vic-Bilh assets. Operatorship and production rights for these assets were transferred in January 2012.

The Montélimar exclusive exploration license, awarded to TOTAL in March 2010 (100%) to assess, in particular, the

shale gas potential of the area, was revoked by the government in October 2011. This revocation stemmed from the law of July 13, 2011, prohibiting the exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons by drilling followed by hydraulic fracturing. The Group had, however, submitted the required report to the government, in which it undertook not to use hydraulic fracturing in light of the current prohibition. An appeal has therefore been filed in December 2011 with the administrative court requesting that the judge cancel the revocation of the license.

InItaly, the Tempa Rossa field (75%, operator), discovered in 1989 and located on the unitized Gorgoglione concession (Basilicate region), is one of TOTAL’s principal assets in the country.

In 2011, Total Italia acquired an additional 25% in the Tempa Rossa field, bringing its stake to 75%, as well as shares in two exploration licenses.

Site preparation work started in early August 2008, but the proceedings initiated by the Prosecutor of the Potenza Court against Total Italia led to a freeze in the preparation work (for additional information, see “Item 8. Financial Information — Legal or arbitration proceedings — Italy”). New calls for tenders were launched related to certain contracts that had been cancelled. Drilling of the Gorgoglione 2 appraisal well that started in June 2010 reached its final depth, confirming the results of the other wells. It is expected to be tested in 2012. The extension plan for the Tarente refinery export system, needed for the development of the Tempa Rossa field, was submitted to the Italian authorities in May 2010 and approved at the end of 2011. Site preparation work began and start-up of production is expected in 2015 with a capacity of 55 kboe/d.

InNorway, where the Group has had operations since the mid-1960s, TOTAL has equity stakes in eighty production licenses on the Norwegian continental shelf, seventeen of which it operates. Norway is the largest single-country contributor to the Group’s production, with volumes of 287 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 310 kboe/d in 2010 and 327 kboe/d in 2009.

In the Norwegian North Sea, where numerous development projects have recently been launched, the Group’s production was 205 kboe/d in 2011. The most substantial contribution to production, for the most part non-operated, comes from the Greater Ekofisk Area (Ekofisk, Eldfisk, Embla, etc.).

Several projects are underway on the Greater Ekofisk Area, located in the south. The Group owns a 39.9% stake in the Ekofisk and Eldfisk

fields. The Ekofisk South and Eldfisk 2 projects were launched in June 2011 following approval of the development and operation plans by the authorities. The project relating to the construction and installation of the new Ekofisk living quarters and utilities platform is now in its second year.

On the Greater Hild Area, located in the north and in which the Group has a 51% stake (operator), the Hild development scheme was selected at the end of 2010. The development and operation plan has been submitted to the authorities in early 2012. Approval is expected in 2012, with production start-up scheduled for 2016.

A number of successful exploration and appraisal activities were carried out in the North Sea in the 2009-2011 period. These activities have led to the launch of several development projects, which are already underway or for which approval by the authorities is expected in 2012:

¡

In the central section of the North Sea, on license PL102C (40%, operator), a fast-track development project has been launched for the Atla field (formerly known as David), which was discovered in 2010. Start-up of gas production is expected in late 2012.

¡

Gas production on the Beta West field (a satellite of Sleipner, 10%), located in the central section of the North Sea, started in April 2011.

¡

In the Visund area of the Nordic North Sea on license PL120 (7.7%), the Visund South fast-track development project for the Pan/Pandora discoveries is underway. Start-up of production is expected in 2012.

¡

The Stjerne project was launched in 2011 to develop the Katla structure discovered in 2009, located on license PL104 (10%) south of Oseberg in the Nordic North Sea. Start-up of oil production is expected in 2013.

¡

The fast-track development project for the Vigdis North East structure (PL089, 5.6%), discovered in 2009 and located south of Snorre, was launched in 2011. It will also allow for enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from the nearby Vigdis East field. Start-up of oil production is expected in late 2012.

¡

A positive appraisal well was drilled in 2010 on the southern slope of the Dagny-Ermintrude structure (6.54%) north of Sleipner. Approval of the development project is expected at the end of 2012 and production is scheduled to start in late 2016.

In the Norwegian Sea, the Haltenbanken area includes the Tyrihans (23.2%), Mikkel (7.7%) and Kristin (6%) fields as well as the Åsgard (7.7%) field and its satellites Yttergryta (24.5%) and Morvin (6%). Morvin started up in August 2010 as planned, with two producing wells. In 2011, the Group’s production in the Haltenbanken area was 63 kboe/d.

The partners decided to go ahead with the Åsgard sub-sea compression project, which will increase hydrocarbon recovery on the Åsgard and Mikkel fields, and the development and operation plan has been submitted to the authorities.

In 2011, TOTAL successfully drilled an exploration well on the Alve North structure on license PL127 (50%, operator) near the Norne field.

In the Barents Sea, LNG production on Snøhvit (18.4%) started in 2007. This project includes development of the Snøhvit, Albatross and Askeladd natural gas fields, as well as the construction of the associated liquefaction facilities. Due to design problems, the plant experienced reduced capacity during the start-up phase. A number of maintenance turnarounds were scheduled to address the issue and the plant is now operating at its design capacity (4.2 Mt/y). In 2011, the Group’s production was 19 kboe/d.

In 2011, TOTAL drilled a positive exploration well on the Norvarg structure in the Barents Sea on license PL535 (40%, operator), which was awarded during the twentieth licensing round.

The Group improved its asset portfolio in Norway by obtaining new licenses and divesting a number of non-strategic assets:

In 2011, TOTAL obtained four new exploration licenses during licensing round APA 2010 (Awards in Predefined Areas), including one as operator. The Group also acquired in 2011 a 40% stake and the role of operator of license PL554, north of Visund. Drilling of an exploration well is expected on the license in 2012. At the beginning of 2012, during licensing round APA 2011, TOTAL obtained eight new licences, including five as operator.

In 2010, the Group divested its stake in the Valhall/Hod fields.

In June 2011, TOTAL announced that it had signed an agreement for the planned sale of its entire stake in Gassled (6.4%) and the associated entities. The sale was effective at the end of 2011.

In theNetherlands, TOTAL has had natural gas exploration and production operations since 1964 and

currently owns twenty-four offshore production licenses, including twenty that it operates, and two offshore exploration licenses, E17c (16.92%) and K1c (30%). In 2011, the Group’s production was 38 kboe/d, compared to 42 kboe/d in 2010 and 45 kboe/d in 2009.

The K5CU development project (49%, operator) was launched in 2009 and production started up in early 2011. This development includes four wells supported by a platform that was installed in 2010 and connected to the K5A platform by a 15 km gas pipeline.

The K4Z development project (50%, operator) began in 2011. This development is comprised of two sub-sea wells connected to the existing production and transport facilities. Start-up of production is expected in early 2013.

In late 2010, TOTAL disposed of 18.19% of its equity stake in the NOGAT gas pipeline and decreased its stake to 5%.

InPoland, at the end of March 2011, TOTAL signed an agreement to acquire a 49% stake in the Chelm and Werbkowice exploration concessions in order to assess their shale gas potential. On the Chelm license, drilling has taken place, the well has been tested and the results from the well are being examined.

In theUnited Kingdom, where TOTAL has had operations since 1962, the Group’s production was 169 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 207 kboe/d in 2010 and 217 kboe/d in 2009. Around 90% of this production comes from operated fields located in two major zones: the Alwyn zone in the northern North Sea, and the Elgin/Franklin zone in the Central Graben.

On the Alwyn zone, start-up of satellite fields or new reservoir compartments allowed production to be maintained. The N52 well drilled on Alwyn (100%) in a new compartment of the Statfjord reservoir came onstream in February 2010 with initial production of 15 kboe/d (gas and condensates). The N53 well was also drilled on Alwyn on the same type of reservoir in 2011 and came onstream in September 2011 with initial production of 4 kboe/d (gas and condensates).

The development project for Islay (100%), a gas and condensates discovery made in 2008 located south of Alwyn, was approved in July 2010. Development is underway and production start-up is expected in the first half of 2012 with a production capacity of 15 kboe/d.

In 2010, TOTAL signed an agreement to divest its stake in the Otter field; its holding fell from 81% to 50% in 2011 and was completely disposed of in February 2012.

In the Central Graben, the development of the Elgin (46.2%, operator) and Franklin (46.2%, operator) fields, in production since 2001, contributed substantially to the Group’s presence in the United Kingdom. At the end of 2011, TOTAL acquired the remaining 22.5% of Elgin Franklin Oil & Gas (EFOG), a company through which it holds a stake in the Elgin and Franklin fields. On the Elgin field, a first infill well came onstream in October 2009 with production of 18 kboe/d. A second infill well started up in May 2010 with production of 12 kboe/d.

Following a gas leak on the Elgin field on March 25, 2012, the production on the Elgin, Franklin and West Franklin fields was stopped and the personnel of the site were evacuated. Investigations are ongoing to determine the causes and the remediation of the gas leak. The Group is actively monitoring the situation (situation as of March 26, 2012).

Additional development of West Franklin through a second phase (drilling of three additional wells and installation of a new platform connected to Elgin) was approved in November 2010. Start-up of production is expected at year-end 2013. The decision was made in 2011 to install a new well platform on the Elgin field. This new platform will be installed in parallel with the West Franklin project and will enable the drilling of new wells on the Elgin field as of 2014.

In addition to Alwyn and the Central Graben, a third area, West of Shetland, is undergoing development. TOTAL increased its equity stake to 80% in the Laggan and Tormore fields in early 2010.

The decision to develop the Laggan/Tormore fields was made in March 2010 and production is scheduled to start in 2014 with an expected capacity of 90 kboe/d. The joint development scheme selected by TOTAL and its partner includes sub-sea production facilities and off-gas treatment (gas and condensates) at a plant located near the Sullom Voe terminal in the Shetland Islands. The gas would then be exported to the Saint-Fergus terminal via a new pipeline connected to the Frigg gas pipeline (FUKA).

In 2010, the Group’s stake in the P967 license (operator), which includes the Tobermory gas discovery, increased to 50% from 43.75%. This license is located north of Laggan/Tormore.

In early 2011, a gas and condensate discovery was made on the Edradour license (75%, operator), near Laggan and Tormore. The development of Edradour using the infrastructures in place is being examined.

TOTAL has stakes in ten assets operated by third parties, the most important in terms of reserves being the Bruce (43.25%) and Alba (12.65%) fields. The Group disposed of its stake in the Nelson field (11.5%) in 2010.

Middle East

3241,1555363119904933171,370570

United Arab Emirates

247712602337024622672240

Iran

Iraq

71766

Oman

246637246137246236

Qatar

365581373856013944616155

Syria

1121853

Yemen

104599510299651240286

In 2011, TOTAL’sTotal production

1,1676,1842,2991,2205,8802,3001,2266,0982,346

Including share of equity affiliates

3251,9556873081,6356113161,383571

Algeria

10310

Angola

163

Colombia

44

Venezuela

357373874044745

United Arab Emirates

240612532256123721962231

Oman

236635236034226234

Qatar

838578736474838278

Russia

1996219715844171946595

Yemen

458842995540274

(a)

The Group’s production in the Middle East was 570 kboe/d, representing 24%Canada consists of bitumen only. All of the Group’s overallbitumen production compared to 527 kboe/dis in 2010 and 438 kboe/d in 2009.Canada.

12TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

PRESENTATION OF PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES BY REGION

The table below sets forth, by country, TOTAL’s producing assets, the year in which TOTAL’s activities commenced, the Group’s interest in each asset and whether TOTAL is operator of the asset.

TOTAL’s producing assets as of December 31, 2013 (a)
Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

In (Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

Africa

Algeria

1952Tin Fouye Tabankort (35.00%)

Angola

1953Girassol, Jasmim, Rosa, Dalia, Pazflor (Block 17) (40.00%)Cabinda Block 0 (10.00%)

Kuito, BBLT, Tombua-Landana (Block 14) (20.00%)(b)

Angola LNG (13.60%)

Gabon

1928

Anguille (100.00%)

Anguille Nord Est (100.00%)

Anguille Sud-Est (100.00%)

Atora (40.00%)

Avocette (57.50%)

Ayol Marine (100.00%)

Baliste (50.00%)

Barbier (100.00%)

Baudroie Marine (50.00%)

Baudroie Nord Marine (50.00%)

Coucal (57.50%)

Girelle (100.00%)

Gonelle (100.00%)

Grand Anguille Marine (100.00%)

Grondin (100.00%)

Hylia Marine (75.00%)

Lopez Nord (100.00%)

Mandaros (100.00%)

M’Boukou (57.5%)

M’Boumba (100.00%)

Mérou Sardine Sud (50.00%)

Pageau (100.00%)

Port Gentil Océan (100.00%)

Port Gentil Sud Marine (100.00%)

Tchengue (100.00%)

Torpille (100.00%)

Torpille Nord Est (100.00%)

Rabi Kounga (47.50%)

Libya

1959

Zones 15, 16 & 32 (75.00%)(c)

Zones 70 & 87 (75.00%)(c)

Zones 129 & 130 (30.00%)(c)

Zones 130 & 131 (24.00%)(c)

Nigeria

1962

OML 58 (40.00%)

OML 99 Amenam-Kpono (30.40%)

OML 100 (40.00%)

OML 102 (40.00%)

OML 102-Ekanga (40.00%)

OML 130 (24.00%)

OML 138 (20.00%)

Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC 10.00%)

OML 118 - Bonga (12.50%)

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.13


Item 4 - Business Overview

TOTAL’s producing assets as of December 31, 2013 (a)
Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

The Congo, Republic of

1928

Kombi-Likalala-Libondo (65.00%)

Moho Bilondo (53.50%)

Nkossa (53.50%)

Nsoko (53.50%)

Sendji (55.25%)

Tchendo (65.00%)

Tchibeli-Litanzi-Loussima (65.00%)

Tchibouela (65.00%)

Yanga (55.25%)

Loango (50.00%)

Zatchi (35.00%)

North America

Canada

1999Surmont (50.00%)

United Arab EmiratesStates

1957Several assets in the Barnett Shale area (25.00%)(d)
Several assets in the Utica Shale area (25.00%)(d)
Chinook (33.33%)
Tahiti (17.00%)

South America

Argentina

1978

Aguada Pichana (27.27%)

Aguada San Roque (24.71%)

Aries (37.50%)

Cañadon Alfa Complex (37.50%)

Carina (37.50%)

Hidra (37.50%)

Kaus (37.50%)

Sierra Chata (2.51%)

Bolivia

1995

San Alberto (15.00%) San Antonio (15.00%)

Itau (41.00%)

Venezuela

1980PetroCedeño (30.323%) Yucal Placer (69.50%)

Asia-Pacific

Australia

2005Various fields in UJV GLNG (27.50%)(e)

Brunei

1986Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam (37.50%)

China

2006South Sulige (49.00%)

Indonesia

1968

Bekapai (50.00%)

Handil (50.00%)

Peciko (50.00%)

Sisi-Nubi (47.90%)

South Mahakam (50.00%)

Tambora (50.00%)

Tunu (50.00%)

Badak (1.05%)

Nilam-gas and condensates (9.29%)

Nilam-oil (10.58%)

Ruby-gas and condensates(15.00%)

Myanmar

1992Yadana (31.24%)

Thailand

1990Bongkot (33.33%)

Commonwealth of Independant States

Azerbaijan

1996Shah Deniz (10.00%)

Kazakhstan

1992Kashagan (16.81%)

Russia

1991Kharyaga (40.00%)
Several fields through the participation in Novatek (16.96%)

Europe

France

1939

Lacq (100.00%)

Lagrave (100.00%)

14TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

Norway

1965

Atla (40.00%)

Skirne (40.00%)

Åsgard (7.68%)

Ekofisk (39.90%)

Ekofisk South (39.90%)

Eldfisk (39.90%)

Embla (39.90%)

Gimle (4.90%)

Glitne (21.80%)

Gungne (10.00%)

Heimdal (16.76%)

Huldra (24.33%)

Islay (5.51%)(f)

Kristin (6.00%)

Kvitebjørn (5.00%)

Mikkel (7.65%)

Morvin (6.00%)

Oseberg (14.70%)

Oseberg East (14.70%)

Oseberg South (14.70%)

Sleipner East (10.00%)

Sleipner West (9.41%)

Snøhvit (18.40%)

Stjerne (14.70%)

Tor (48.20%)

Troll I (3.69%)

Troll II (3.69%)

Tune (10.00%)

Tyrihans (23.145%)

Vale (24.24%)

Vilje (24.24%)

Visund (7.70%)

Visund South (7.70%)

Visund North (7.70%)

Yttergryta (24.50%)

The Netherlands

1964

F6a gaz (55.66%)

F6a huile (65.68%)

F15a Jurassic (38.20%)

F15a/F15d Triassic (32.47%)

F15d (32.47%)

J3a (30.00%)

K1a (40.10%)

K1b/K2a (60.00%)

K2c (60.00%)

K3b (56.16%)

K3d (56.16%)

K4a (50.00%)

K4b/K5a (36.31%)

K5b (50.00%)

K6/L7 (56.16%)

L1a (60.00%)

L1d (60.00%)

L1e (55.66%)

L1f (55.66%)

L4a (55.66%)

L4d (55.66%)

E16a (16.92%)

E17a/E17b (14.10%)

J3b/J6 (25.00%)

Q16a (6.49%)

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.15


Item 4 - Business Overview

Year of
entry into
the country

Operated

(Group share in %)

Non-operated

(Group share in %)

United Kingdom

1962

Alwyn North, Dunbar, Forvie North, Ellon, Grant ,Jura Nuggets (100.00%)

Elgin-Franklin, West Franklin (EFOG 46.17%)(g)

Glenelg (49.47%)

Islay (94.49%)(f)

Bruce (43.25%)

Markham unitized fields (7.35%)

Keith (25.00%)

Middle East

U.A.E.

1939Abu Dhabi-Abu Al Bu Khoosh (75.00%)

Abu Dhabi offshore (13.33%)(h)

Abu Dhabi onshore (9.50%)(i)

GASCO (15.00%)

ADGAS (5.00%)

Iraq

1920Halfaya (18.75%)(j)

Oman

1937

Various fields onshore (Block 6) (4.00%)(k)

Mukhaizna field (Block 53) (2.00%)(l)

Qatar

1936Al Khalij (100.00%)

North Field-Bloc NF Dolphin (24.50%)

North Field-Bloc NFB (20.00%)

North Field-Qatargas 2 Train 5 (16.70%)

Yemen

1987Kharir/Atuf (Block 10) (28.57%)
Various fields onshore (Block 5) (15.00%)

(a)

The Group’s interest in the local entity is approximately 100% in all cases except for Total Gabon (58.28%) and certain entities in Abu Dhabi and Oman (see notes b through l below).

(b)

Stake in the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%).

(c)

TOTAL’s stake in the foreign consortium.

(d)

TOTAL’s interest in the joint venture with Chesapeake.

(e)

TOTAL’s interest in the unincorporated joint venture.

(f)

The field of Islay extends partially in Norway. TOTAL E&P UK holds a 94.49 % and TOTAL E&P Norge 5.51%.

(g)

TOTAL holds a 46.17% indirect interest through its interest in EFOG (company 100% owned by TOTAL).

(h)

Through ADMA (equity affiliate), where TOTAL has had operations since 1939,holds a 13.33% interest and participates in the Group’s production was 240 kboe/doperating company, Abu Dhabi Marine Operating Company.

(i)

Through ADPC (equity affiliate), TOTAL holds a 9.50% interest and participates in 2011, compared to 222 kboe/d in 2010 and 214 kboe/d in 2009. The increase in production in 2011 was mainly due to higher production bythe operating company, Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations (ADCO)Operation.

(j)

TOTAL holds an interest of 18.75% in the consortium.

(k)

TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 4.00% in Petroleum Development Oman LLC, operator of Block 6, via its 10% interest in Pohol. TOTAL also holds a 5.54% interest in the Oman LNG facility (trains 1 and Abu Dhabi Marine (ADMA)2), and an indirect participation of 2.04% through OLNG in Qalhat LNG (train 3).

(l)

In Abu Dhabi, TOTAL holds a 75%direct interest of 2.00% in Block 53.

Africa

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in Africa was 670 kboe/d, representing 29% of the Group’s overall production, compared to 713 kboe/d in 2012 and 659 kboe/d in 2011.

InSouth Africa, TOTAL acquired an interest in the 11B-12B license (50%, operator) in September 2013. This license, which covers an area of 19,000 km2, is located approximately 175 km south of the South African coast in water depths ranging from 200 m to 1,800 m. The drilling of an exploration well is planned for 2014.

In addition, in August 2013, the Group was granted approval by the South African authorities to convert its technical cooperation license for the Outeniqua Block (100%) into an exploration license, subject to the sale by TOTAL of 20% of its stake when the corresponding license agreement will have been negotiated and signed. The Outeniqua Block, which covers approximately 76,000 km2, is located to the southwest of the 11B-12B license in water depths ranging from 400 m to 4,000 m. A 2D seismic campaign of 7,000 km combined with sea bed core drilling activities is expected to be launched.

InAlgeria, TOTAL’s production was 21 kboe/d during 2013, compared to 23 kboe/d in 2012 and 33 kboe/d in 2011. The decline in production between 2011 and 2012 was mainly due to

the sale of TOTAL’s interest in CEPSA (48.83%), which was completed in July 2011. All of the Group’s production in Algeria now comes from the Tin Fouyé Tabenkort (TFT) field (35%). TOTAL also has stakes of 37.75% and 47% in the Timimoun and Ahnet gas development projects, respectively.

On the TFT field, plateau production was maintained at 170 kboe/d.

The development of the Timimoun field continued in 2013 and the responses for the main calls for tender (plant construction and drilling devices) have been reviewed. In February 2014, the main contract was allocated. Commercial gas production could start in 2017, with anticipated plateau production of 1.6 Bm3/year (160 Mcf/d). The 3D seismic survey of an area of 2,240 km2, which started in December 2012, was completed in July 2013. The data is currently being analyzed.

Within the framework of the Ahnet project, discussions are continuing between the project partners and the authorities, particularly in light of the provisions of the new 13-02 oil legislation, which provide greater incentives for the development of unconventional hydrocarbons. The anticipated plateau production is 4 Bm3/year (400 Mcf/d) as of 2018.

InAngola, the Group’s production in 2013 was 186 kboe/d, compared to 179 kboe/d in 2012 and 135 kboe/d in 2011, and

16TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

comes from Blocks 0, 14 and 17. Recent highlights include the launch of the CLOV project in 2010, the start-up of production on Pazflor in 2011, several discoveries on Blocks 15/06 and 17/06, and, finally, the acquisition of interests in exploration Blocks 25, 39 and 40 in the Kwanza basin.

Deep-offshore Block 17 (40%, operator) is TOTAL’s principal asset in Angola. It is composed of four major hubs: Girassol, Dalia, Pazflor, which are all in production, and CLOV, which is currently being developed. The Pazflor project, consisting of the Perpetua, Zinia, Hortensia and Acacia fields, has achieved plateau production (220 kb/d). The CLOV project, which was launched in 2010, will result in the installation of a fourth Floating Production, Storage and Offloading unit (FPSO) with a production capacity of 160 kbd/d. Production start-up is expected mid-2014.

On the ultra-deep-offshore Block 32 (30%, operator), the basic engineering studies for the Kaombo project were completed and the final investment decision is expected to be made in the first half of 2014. The project will permit the development of the discoveries made in the southeast portion of the block through two FPSOs with a capacity in excess of 100 kb/d each.

On Block 14 (20%(1)), production comes from the Tombua-Landana and Kuito fields as well as the BBLT project, comprising the Benguela, Belize, Lobito and Tomboco fields.

Block 14K (36.75%) corresponds to the offshore unitization zone between Angola (Block 14) and the Republic of Congo (Haute Mer license). The development of the Lianzi field, which was started in 2012, will be achieved by means of a connection to the existing BBLT platform (Block 14). Production start-up is planned for 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized block is held 10% through Angola Block 14 BV and 26.75% through Total E&P Congo.

On Block 0 (10%), the development of Mafumeira Sul was approved by the partners and the authorities in 2012. This project constitutes the second phase of the development of the Mafumeira field. Production start-up is planned for 2016.

On Block 15/06 (15%), the development of a first production hub, including the discoveries located in the northwest portion of the block, began in early 2012. In February 2014, TOTAL signed an agreement to sell its entire interest in Block 15/06. The closing of this transaction is expected to take place during the first half of 2014.

TOTAL has operations on exploration Blocks 33 (58.67%, operator), 17/06 (30%, operator), 25 (35%, operator), 39 (15%) and 40 (50%, operator). The Group plans to drill pre-salt targets in Blocks 25, 39 and 40 in 2014 in the deep offshore Kwanza basin. TOTAL signed a disposal agreement to reduce its interest in Block 40 to 40%. The closing of this transaction is expected to take place during the first half of 2014.

TOTAL is also developing its LNG activities through the Angola LNG project (13.6%), which includes a gas liquefaction plant near Soyo supplied in particular by the gas associated with production from Blocks 0, 14, 15, 17 and 18. LNG production started in June 2013 but, due to various incidents, the plant has not yet reached full capacity (5.2 Mt/y).

InCameroon, TOTAL no longer holds any exploration or production assets since the sale of its subsidiary Total E&P Cameroun in 2011. Production was 3 kboe/d in 2011.

InCôte d’Ivoire, TOTAL is active in four deep offshore exploration licenses located 50 km to 100 km from the coast and covering approximately 5,200 km2 at water depths ranging from 1,000 m to 3,000 m.

TOTAL is the operator of the CI-100 (60%) license in the Tano basin and holds stakes in the CI-514 (54%, operator), CI-515 (45%) and CI-516 (45%) licenses in the San Pedro basin.

A comprehensive 3D seismic survey has been conducted on the CI-100 license and a first exploration well (Ivoire-1X) was drilled in early 2013 in the northwest portion of the block at a water depth of more than 2,300 m. This well has encountered a good-quality oil horizon. The recorded data is currently undergoing analysis in order to assess the potential of the discovered reservoirs and define an exploration and additional works program.

A 3D seismic survey campaign covering the whole of the three licenses CI-514, CI-515 and CI-516 was completed in December 2012. The interpretation of the data is ongoing.

Following the drilling of a first exploration well on license CI-514, two more wells are due to be drilled on licenses CI-515 and CI-516 during the course of 2014.

InEgypt, TOTAL is the operator of Block 4 (East El Burullus Offshore) and reduced its stake in this license from 90% to 50% in January 2013. The license, located in the Nile river basin, covers a 4-year initial exploration period and includes a commitment to carrying out 3D seismic work and drilling exploration wells. Following the 3D seismic campaign covering 3,374 km2 that was conducted in 2011, an exploration well (Kala-1) was drilled in late 2013, whose results have been disappointing.

InGabon, the Group’s production in 2013 was 59 kboe/d compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 58 kboe/d in 2011. The Group’s exploration and production activities in Gabon are mainly carried out by Total Gabon(2), one of the Group’s oldest subsidiaries in sub-Saharan Africa.

As part of the Anguille field redevelopment project (estimated production capacity of 20 kboe/d), the AGM North platform, from which twenty-one additional development wells are expected to be drilled, was installed in 2012. Production started as planned with two wells in March 2013.

On the deep-offshore Diaba license, the operator Total Gabon sold off part of its interest in 2012 and now has a stake of 42.5%. An initial exploration well (Diaman-1B) was drilled during 2013 at a water depth of more than 1,700 m. This well revealed an accumulation of gas and condensates in the pre-salt reservoirs of the Gamba Formation. Data analysis is currently underway in order to assess this discovery and reassess the surrounding prospects.

The Nguongui-updip well was drilled on the Mutamba-Iroru license (50%) in 2012 and revealed the presence of hydrocarbons. Work is currently being conducted to evaluate the commercial viability of this discovery. A 2D seismic survey was conducted on the Nziembou license (20%) in 2012. Drilling preparation activities are being conducted for a first exploration well scheduled in 2014.

InKenya, TOTAL acquired a 40% stake in five offshore licenses in the Lamu basin in 2011, namely licenses L5, L7, L11a, L11b and L12, representing a total surface area of more than 30,600 km2 at water depths of between 100 m and 3,000 m. Following the 3D

(1)

Interest held by the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%, INPEX Corporation 49.99% since February 2013).

(2) 

Total Gabon is a Gabonese company listed on Euronext Paris. The Group holds 58.28%, the Republic of Gabon holds 25% and the public float is 16.72%.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.17


Item 4 - Business Overview

seismic survey campaign covering 3,500 km2 that was conducted during the initial exploration period, 25% of the surface area of the five blocks was relinquished. In 2013, two exploration wells were drilled in Blocks L7 and L11b, but did not result in positive results. In 2012, the Group also acquired the L22 offshore license (100%, operator), located in the same basin and covering a surface area of more than 10,000 km2 in water depths ranging from 2,000 m to 3,500 m. In December 2013, TOTAL sold 30% of its stake in this license. A 2D seismic survey and sea core drilling operations are planned for 2014 on the L22 offshore license.

InLibya, the Group’s production in 2013 was 50 kb/d compared to 62 kb/d in 2012 and 20 kb/d in 2011. TOTAL is a partner in the following contract zones: 15, 16 & 32 (75%(1)), 70 & 87 (75%(1)), 129 & 130 (30%(1)) and 130 & 131 (24%(1) and Block NC191 (100%(1), operator).

Production which, in 2012, had returned to its level prior to the events of 2011 was affected from mid-2013 onward by the blockade of most of the country’s terminals and pipelines due to social and political unrest.

In onshore zones 70 and 87 (Mabruk), production has been affected since August 2013 due to the blockade of the Es Sider export terminal. Development of the Garian field was approved in July 2013 and production at the field is expected to start in the third quarter 2014.

In onshore zones 129, 130 and 131, production was stopped in 2013 during several months due to the blocking of the production installation and the evacuation pipeline. The seismic survey campaign, which was interrupted in 2011 due to force majeure, has not yet resumed. However, the exploration of these blocks continued in 2013 with the drilling of three wells.

In the onshore Murzuk basin, a plan for the development of Block NC 191 was submitted to the authorities in 2009. Discussions have resumed following the interruptions associated with the events of 2011.

In offshore zones 15, 16 and 32 (Al Jurf), production has not been affected by the social unrest in the country. The drilling of two exploration wells scheduled for the second quarter of 2013 was postponed due to technical reasons. The first of these wells was started at the end of 2013.

InMadagascar, TOTAL is active on the Bemolanga 3102 license (60%, operator). Since the exploitation of oil sand accumulations is no longer planned, TOTAL is refocusing on the conventional exploration of the block, which is expected to continue in 2014 with a 2D seismic survey following the approval of an additional2-year extension of the exploration phase by the local authorities.

InMorocco, the Anzarane offshore reconnaissance contract covering an offshore zone of 100,000 km2, which was granted in December 2011 to TOTAL and ONHYM (National Bureau of Petroleum and Mines), was extended for one year in December 2013. A 3D seismic survey campaign covering 5,900 km2 that started in late 2012 was completed in July 2013. The collected data is currently being processed.

InMauritania, the Group has exploration operations on the Ta7 and Ta8 licenses (60%, operator) located in the Taoudenni basin. In 2012, TOTAL acquired interests in two exploration licenses

(90%, operator): Block C9 in ultra-deep offshore, and Block Ta29 onshore in the Taoudenni basin. During 2013, TOTAL sold 18% of its stake in Block Ta29, but retains operatorship and a 72% interest.

Following a 2D seismic survey performed in 2011 on license Ta7, well Ta7-1 was drilled in 2013. Tests have been conducted, but they did not allow to highlight hydrocarbons in commercial quantity.

On Block Ta29, a 900 km2 seismic was performed in 2012. The processing and the interpretation of these seismic data have been completed. Studies are underway to identify a prospect on this block.

A 3D seismic survey campaign covering 4,700 km2 was conducted on Block C9 in 2013. The data is currently being processed and interpreted.

InMozambique, TOTAL acquired in 2012 a 40% stake in the production sharing contract regarding offshore Blocks 3 and 6. Located in the Rovuma basin, these two blocks cover a total surface area of 15,250 km² in water depths ranging from 0 m to 2,500 m. An exploration well was drilled in 2012 and half of the surface area of the two blocks was relinquished in 2013 at the start of the second exploration period.

InNigeria, Group production in 2013 was 261 kboe/d compared to 279 kboe/d in 2012 and 287 kboe/d in 2011. These declines are primarily due to the sharp increase in oil bunkering and in 2013 the blockade of Nigeria LNG export cargos. Despite such factors negatively affecting production, Nigeria remained the main contributor to the Group’s production.

TOTAL, which has been present in the country since 1962, operates six production licenses (OML) out of the thirty-eight in which it has a stake, and one out of the four exploration licenses (OPL) in which it is present.

Regarding variations in TOTAL’s licenses:

In September 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the authorities to increase its stake in exploration license OPL 285 from 26.67% to 60%. In May 2013, TOTAL obtained the approval of the authorities for the renewal of licenses OML 99, 100 and 102 for a period of twenty years.

On the OML 138 license (20%), TOTAL started production in the Usan offshore field in 2012 (180 kb/d, FPSO capacity), which reached the level of 130 kboe/d in 2013. Since February 2014, TOTAL is no longer the operator of the OML 138 license. In 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement for the sale of its 20% stake in Block OML 138. The approval by the authorities has not yet been received.

TOTAL decided not to continue its exploration activities in JDZ Block 1 (48.6%, operator) following the analysis of the results of wells drilled in 2012. Block was relinquished in September 2013. Also, the Block OPL 221 was relinquished in November 2013.

TOTAL sold its 10% stake in Blocks OML 26 and 42 in 2011 and in Blocks OML 30, 34 and 40 in 2012. These interests had previously been indirectly controlled via the joint venture Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC).

(1) 

TOTAL’s stake in the Abu Al Bu Khoosh field (operator), a 9.5% stake in ADCO, which operatesforeign consortium.

18TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

TOTAL continues, with its developments, to meet the growing domestic demand for gas and to strengthen its ability to supply gas to the LNG projects in which it owns a stake:

As part of its joint venture with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), TOTAL is pursuing the project to increase the gas production capacity of the OML 58 license (40%, operator) from 370 Mcf/d to 550 Mcf/d.

On the OML 102 license (40%, operator), TOTAL is continuing to develop the Ofon phase 2 project, which was launched in 2011, with an expected capacity of 70 kboe/d and production start-up is scheduled for the end of 2014. In 2011, the Group also discovered Etisong North, located 15 km from the currently-producing Ofon field. The exploration campaign continued in 2012 with the drilling of the Eben well, which is also south of Ofon. The positive results produced by this well further enhance the interest of the future Etisong-Eben development hub as a satellite of the Ofon field.

On the OML 130 license (24%, operator), the development of the Egina field (capacity of 200 kboe/d) was launched in June 2013 and contracts have been awarded. Production start-up is expected at year-end 2017.

On the OML 99 license (40%, operator), engineering work is underway to develop the Ikike field, where production is expected to start in 2017 (estimated capacity of 55 kboe/d).

On the OML 112/117 licenses (40%), development studies have been suspended waiting for the resolution of contractual issues that arose in 2013

TOTAL is also active in the LNG sector with a 15% holding in the company Nigeria LNG, which possesses a liquefaction plant of a total capacity of 22 Mt/y. In addition, TOTAL holds a 17% stake in Brass LNG, which is continuing to study the project for a gas liquefaction plant with two LNG trains of a capacity of 5 Mt/y each.

The production that is not operated by the Group in Nigeria comes mainly from the SPDC joint venture, in which TOTAL holds a 10% stake. The sharp increase of oil bunkering in 2013 had an impact on onshore production, as well as on the integrity of the facilities and the local environment.

In addition, TOTAL also holds a 12.5% stake in the OML 118 deep-offshore license. In connection with this license, the Bonga field contributed 15 kboe/d to Group production in 2013. The partners continued the development of the Bonga Northwest project in 2013. On the OML 118 license, a pre-unitization agreement relating to the Bonga South West discovery has been signed in December 2013.

InUganda, TOTAL has been active since 2012 and holds a 33.33% interest in the EA-1, EA-1A and EA-2 licenses as well as the Kingfisher license. All of these licenses are located in the Lake Albert region, where oil resources have already been discovered. TOTAL is the operator of licenses EA-1 and EA-1A and a partner on the other licenses.

On the appraisal license EA-1, a campaign of wells, production tests and a 3D seismic survey are underway. Five development plans will be submitted to the authorities before the end of 2014: Ngiri (submitted in December 2013), Jobi-Rii (April 2014), and Mpyo, Gunya and Jobi East (December 2014).

The EA-1A license expired in February 2013, following a campaign involving the drilling of five exploration wells that resulted in one discovery (Lyec). With the exception of the scope relating to this discovery, the license has been returned to the authorities.

On the appraisal license EA-2, the campaign of wells and production tests started in 2012 continued during 2013. An additional well is due to be drilled in 2014. Two development plans were submitted to the authorities in June 2013 (Kasamene and Wahrindi fields, as well as those of Kigogole, Ngege, Ngara and Nsoga).

The development plan for the Kingfisher field, which is located on the EA-3 production license, was approved by the authorities in September 2013. The basic engineering studies are currently being prepared.

The Kanywataba exploration well was drilled in June 2012 with negative results. The Kanywataba license expired in August 2012 and was returned to the authorities.

At the initiative of the Ugandan government, discussions are underway concerning the construction of a refinery that will be developed in two phases (30 kb/d in the first phase followed by a second phase providing an additional 30 kb/d), as well as an export pipeline.

In theRepublic of Congo, the Group’s production in 2013 was 93 kboe/d compared to 113 kboe/d in 2012 and 123 kboe/d in 2011. The decrease in production was due in particular to the end of plateau production at Moho Bilondo in mid-2010 and to a planned shut-down on the Nkossa field.

The development of the Lianzi field was approved in 2012. Located in the offshore unitization zone Block 14K (36.75%) between Angola and the Republic of Congo (Haute Mer license), this field will be developed by a tieback to the existing Benguela-Belize-Lobito-Tomboco platform (Block 14 in Angola). Production start-up is expected in 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized block is held 26.75% through Total E&P Congo and 10% through Angola Block 14 BV.

The Moho Bilondo offshore field (53.5%, operator) reached plateau production of 90 kboe/d in mid-2010. The field has now started its decline. The Phase 1b and Moho North projects were launched in March 2013 following agreements on the contractual and fiscal conditions in 2012. Production start-up is planned for 2015 and 2016, respectively, with estimated production capacity of 140 kboe/d (40 kboe/d for Phase 1b and 100 kboe/d for Moho North).

Production at Libondo (65%, operator), which is part of the Kombi-Likalala-Libondo operating license, started in 2011. Plateau production reached 12 kboe/d in 2011.

In July 2013, TOTAL obtained the Haute Mer B license (34.62%, operator) in association with other partners.

As part of the renewal of the Loango and Zatchi licenses, an agreement on the related contractual and fiscal conditions was signed in October 2013. This agreement is subject to approval by the parliament. TOTAL’s interest in these licenses will change respectively from 50% to 42.50% for Loango and from 35% to 29.75% for Zatchi with retroactive effect in October 2013.

In December 2013, in connection with a share capital increase of Total E&P Congo, Qatar Petroleum International Upstream (QPI) entered into the share capital of this subsidiary at a level of 15%.

In theDemocratic Republic of the Congo, following the Presidential decree approving TOTAL’s entry in 2011 as operator with a 60% interest in Block III of the Graben Albertine, the exploration permit was issued in January 2012 by the Minister of Hydrocarbons for a period of three years and subsequently extended by an additional year due to the postponement of the works in light of the general security situation in the eastern part of

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.19


Item 4 - Business Overview

the country. This block is located in the Lake Albert region. TOTAL acquired an additional 6.66% of this block in March 2012. The prospecting program is limited to the northern portion of the license, which is outside the Virunga park. A helicopter acquisition of gravimetric and magnetic data was completed in August 2012 with encouraging results. The 2D seismic survey campaign prepared in 2013 is scheduled to start in 2014.

In theRepublic of South Sudan, TOTAL is negotiating a new contract with the state authorities that would make it possible to resume exploration activities in part of Block B. Since the independence of the Republic of South Sudan on July 9, 2011, TOTAL is no longer present in Sudan.

North America

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in North America was 73 kboe/d, representing 3% of the Group’s total production, compared to 69 kboe/d in 2012 and 67 kboe/d in 2011.

InCanada, the Group’s production in 2013 was 13 kboe/d compared to 12 kboe/d in 2012 and 11 kboe/d in 2011. The Group’s oil sands portfolio is focused around two main hubs: on the one hand, a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) hub focused on continuing developments at Surmont’s (50%), and, on the other, a mining hub, which includes the Joslyn (38.25%, operator), Fort Hills (39.2%) and Northern Lights (50%, operator) mining projects as well as a 100% stake in a number of oil sands leases acquired through a series of auction sales.

On the Surmont lease, additional wells were drilled in 2013 in order to optimize production. The decision to construct an additional steam generation unit was also made with the same aim in mind. The drilling of additional wells is expected to continue in 2014.

In early 2010, the partners involved in the project decided to launch the construction of the second development phase. The goal of production start-up from Surmont Phase 2 has been set for 2015 and overall production capacity from the field is expected to increase to 130 kboe/d.

On the Fort Hills project (production capacity estimated at 180 kb/d), the final investment decision was made in October 2013. Site preparation work is underway and production start-up is planned for the end of 2017.

On the Joslyn license, engineering studies are currently being conducted in order to optimize production from the Joslyn North Mine project.

In March 2013, TOTAL concluded an agreement for the five major onshore fields in Abu Dhabi, and a 13.3% stake in ADMA, which operates two offshore fields. TOTAL also has a 15% stake in Abu Dhabi Gas Industries (GASCO), which produces LPG and condensates from the associated gas produced by ADCO, and a 5% stake in Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company (ADGAS), which produces LNG, LPG and condensates.

In early 2009, TOTAL signed agreements for a 20-year extensionsale of its 49% stake in the GASCO joint venture startingVoyageurupgraderproject.

In theUnited States, the Group’s production in 2013 was 60 kboe/d compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 56 kboe/d in 2011.

In the Gulf of Mexico:

Phase 2 of the deep-offshore Tahiti oil field (17%) was launched in 2010. This phase comprises drilling four injection wells and two producing wells. The injection of water started in 2012. The first producing well was put into operation in late 2013 and the second producing well, the drilling of which is currently being completed, is due to start production in 2014.

The Chinook 4 well in the deep-offshore Chinook project (33.33%) started production in the third quarter of 2012.

Drilling of the Chinook 5 well was completed in 2013 and started production in early 2014.

The TOTAL (40%) — Cobalt (60%, operator) alliance’s exploratory drilling campaign, which was launched in 2009, was resumed in 2012 after the U.S. government lifted the moratorium on October 1, 2008.deep-offshore drilling operations. This resulted in the drilling of the Ligurian 2 well (dry well) together with the North Platte well at which a major oil discovery was made and for which studies are currently being conducted. The Ardennes well, which was drilled in 2013, gave disappointing results, just like the Aegean well, which was completed in December 2013. The Aegean well is the last one of the drilling campaign.

TOTAL is active in shale gas production in Texas and has a 25% stake in the Chesapeake portfolio in the Barnett Shale basin through its participation in a joint venture with Chesapeake. Given the drop in gas prices in the United States, drilling operations have been sharply reduced from 2012 onwards (approximately sixty wells drilled in 2013 compared to 100 in 2012 and more than 300 in 2011).

TOTAL is also active in the production of shale gas in Ohio and has a 25% stake in the liquid-rich Utica shale gas play through a joint venture with Chesapeake and EnerVest. More than 200 liquids-rich gas wells were drilled in 2013 (compared to approximately 100 in 2012) and approximately 190 of these have been connected and started producing (compared to forty-seven in 2012).

Engineers from TOTAL are assigned to the teams led by Chesapeake.

The Group holds a 50% stake in American Shale Oil LLC (AMSO) to developin situ shale oil technology. The firstin situ heating tests have been performed and are resulting in adaptations to the selected technology.

In early 2011,2012, TOTAL entered into a 50/50 association with Red Leaf Resources for the ex-situ development of oil shale and IPIC,agreed to fund a government-owned entityproduction pilot before any larger-scale development. In addition, TOTAL finalized an agreement to purchase approximately 120 km2 of additional land in Abu Dhabi, signed a Memorandum of UnderstandingColorado and Utah, with a view to developing projectsin situ shale oil techniques (AMSO technique) orex-situ techniques (Red Leaf technique).

InMexico, TOTAL is conducting various studies with state-owned PEMEX under a general technical cooperation agreement renewed in July 2011 for a period of five years.

South America

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in South America was 166 kboe/d, representing 7% of the Group’s total production, compared to 182 kboe/d in 2012 and 188 kboe/d in 2011.

InArgentina, where TOTAL has been present since 1978, the Group operated about 30%(1) of the country’s production in 2013. The Group’s production in 2013 was 78 kboe/d compared to 83 kboe/d in 2012 and 86 kboe/d in 2011. In order to encourage investment in exploration and production, the Argentinean government has concluded gas price agreements with various producers as of December 2012. Under the terms of these agreements, the Argentinean government guarantees the price of gas for quantities above a fixed production level in exchange for

(1)

Source: Argentinean Ministry of commonFederal Planning, Public Investment and Services — Energy Secretary.

20TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

compliance with defined production targets and applicable penalties (i.e., “Deliver or Pay”). In February 2013, TOTAL signed an agreement of this type for a period of five years with retroactive effect from December 1, 2012.

In Tierra del Fuego, the Group notably operates the Carina and Aries offshore fields (37.5%). Following the re-appraisal of the reserves of the Carina field, three additional wells are expected to be drilled from the existing platform. These wells should allow production levels from the facilities operated by the Group in Tierra del Fuego to be maintained at about 630 Mcf/d until the Vega Pleyade field (37.5%, operator) starts up in 2015. Development of this field started in October 2013.

In the Neuquén basin, TOTAL started a drilling campaign on its mining licenses in 2011 in order to assess their shale gas and oil potential. In 2012 and 2013, this campaign, which started on the Aguada Pichana license (27.3%, operator), was extended to all the blocks operated by the Group: San Roque (24.7%, operator), Rincón la Ceniza and La Escalonada (85%, operator), Aguada de Castro (42.5%, operator), and Pampa de las Yeguas II (42.5%, operator), as well as to the blocks operated by third parties: Cerro Las Minas (40%), Cerro Partido (45%), Rincón de Aranda (45%), and Veta Escondida (45%). The first results, all positive, of the production tests on the wells drilled during this campaign permit envisaging various development scenarios in the region. A pilot development intended to test the unconventional production potential at the Aguada Pichana Block is expected to enter into production in late 2014.

InBolivia, the Group’s production, primarily gas, was 28 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 27 kboe/d in 2012 and 25 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL has stakes in seven licenses: three production licenses, San Alberto and San Antonio (15%) and Block XX Tarija Oeste (41%), two licenses in the development phase, Aquio and Ipati (60%, operator), and two licenses in the exploration or appraisal phase, Rio Hondo (50%) and Azero (50%, operator).

Production started in 2011 on the Itaú gas and condensates field located on Block XX Tarija Oeste; it is routed to the existing facilities of the neighboring San Alberto field. Phase 2 of the development of the field entered into production at the end of 2013.

In 2004, TOTAL discovered the Incahuasi gas field on the Ipati Block. In 2011 and 2013, two additional wells confirmed the extension of the discovery northwards onto the adjacent Aquio Block as well as southwards onto the Ipati license. In April 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the authorities to start development of Phase 1 of the project, including the connection of three existing wells to a central processing plant of 6.5 Mm3/d. The key contracts relating to the construction of the plant and its connection to the export network were granted in October 2013. In July 2013, TOTAL sold 20% stakes in the Aquio and Ipati fields thereby reducing its interest in the upstream oil and gas sectors.these fields from 80 to 60%.

The Group hasIn August 2013, TOTAL acquired a 24.5%50% stake in Dolphin Energy Ltd. alongside Mubadala, a company owned by the governmentAzero exploration license in the Andean Piedmont. This is located to the west of the Abu Dhabi Emirate, to market gas produced primarily in Qatar to the United Arab Emirates.

The Group also owns 33.33%Ipati and Aquio Blocks and covers an area of Ruwais Fertilizer Industries (FERTIL), which produces urea. FERTIL 2, a new project, was launched in 2009 to build a new granulated urea unit with a capacity of 3,500 t/d (1.2 Mt/y). This project is expected to allow FERTIL to more than double production so as7,800 km2.

InBrazil, the Group has stakes in fourteen exploration licenses.

In October 2013, TOTAL acquired a 20% stake in the Libra field. This field is currently being assessed and is the largest pre-salt oil field discovered to reach nearly 2 Mt/ydate in January 2013.

InIraq, TOTAL bid in 2009 and 2010 on the three calls for tenders launched bySantos basin off the Iraqi Ministrycoast of Oil.Brazil. The PetroChina-led consortium that includes TOTAL (18.75%) was awarded the development and production contract for the Halfaya field during the second call for tenders held in December 2009. This field is located in very deep water (2,000 m) approximately 170 km off the coast of Rio de Janeiro and covers an area of 1,550 km2. Additional

exploration works including contractual obligations to be realized by the end of 2017 and appraisal and development studies of the field were launched.

Following the eleventh call for tender organized by the Brazilian authorities in May 2013, TOTAL acquired a stake in ten new operating licenses. Holding a 40% stake, the Group operates five blocks (FZA-M-57, FZA-M-86, FZA-M-88, FZA-M-125 and FZA-M-127) located in the Foz do Amazonas basin and has a 45% interest in a block (CE-M-661) located in the Ceara basin. TOTAL also has a 25% stake in three blocks (ES-M-669, ES-M-671 and ES-M-743) located in the Espirito Santo basin and a 50% share in another block (BAR-M-346) located in the Barreirinhas basin.

TOTAL also has a stake in the Xerelete field, which the Group has operated since 2012. This stake is primarily located on Block BC-2 (41.2%) and extends into Block BM-C-14 (50%). The drilling of a well targeting pre-salt horizons was launched at the beginning of January 2014.

A well was drilled in 2012 in the Gato Do Mato field, which is located in Block BM-S-54 (20%) and was discovered in the Santos basin in 2010. The encouraging results are currently being analyzed in order to define the next stages in the assessment of the field.

InColombia, TOTAL no longer has production since the sale in 2012 of one of its subsidiaries, TEPMA BV, which held a stake in the Cusiana field. Production was 6 kboe/d in 2012 and 11 kboe/d in 2011.

Following the discovery of Huron-1 on the Niscota (50%) license in 2009 and the drilling of the second well, Huron-2, which yielded positive test results in April 2013, a third well, Huron-3, was drilled with disappointing results. The conceptual development studies have started for a declaration of commerciality that is expected during the second quarter of 2014.

After selling 10% of its stake in the Ocensa pipeline in 2011 and reducing its interest in this asset to 5.2%, TOTAL sold its entire stake in 2013, but kept its transport rights. TOTAL has relinquished its stakes in the OAM and ODC pipelines that were previously held by TEPMA BV.

InFrench Guiana, TOTAL owns a 25% stake in the Guyane Maritime license. This license, located approximately 150 km from the coast in water depths ranging from 200 m to 3,000 m, covers an area of approximately 24,000 km². At the end of 2011, the authorities extended the research permit until May 31, 2016.

In 2011, drilling at the GM-ES-1 well, which is located on the Zaedyus prospect at a water depth of more than 2,000 m, revealed two hydrocarbon columns in sandstone reservoirs. Two 3D seismic survey campaigns covering a total area of more than 5,000 km2 were conducted in the center and extreme eastern portions of the block in 2012. A drilling campaign consisting of four wells was conducted from July 2012 until the end of 2013. The results of this campaign did not make it possible to prove the existence of an exploitable hydrocarbon reservoir, but the results did provide additional information that is currently being analyzed.

In Trinidad and Tobago, where TOTAL has been active since 1996, the Group’s production in 2013 was 12 kboe/d compared to 16 kboe/d in 2012 and 12 kboe/d in 2011. In September 2013, TOTAL sold all of its exploration and production assets by disposing of the companies Total E&P Trinidad BV, which held a 30% stake in the Angostura offshore field located in Block 2C, and Elf Exploration Trinidad BV, which owned an 8.5% share in the adjacent exploration Block 3A. The Group no longer owns any exploration or production assets in the country.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.21


Item 4 - Business Overview

InUruguay, TOTAL holds a 100% stake in three exploration licenses: offshore Block 14, and onshore Blocks B1 and B2.

In October 2013, TOTAL signed two exploration and production contracts for Blocks B1 and B2 for unconventional plays. These two blocks, which cover a total area of 5,200 km2, are primarily located in the Artigas province in the northwestern part of the country. The commitments undertaken in respect of these licenses relate to the conduct of geological, geochemical and environmental studies.

In 2012, TOTAL acquired a stake in Block 14, which is located approximately 250 km offshore in water depths ranging from 2,000 m to 3,500 m and covers an area of some 6,700 km². In particular, TOTAL agreed to conduct a 3D seismic survey of the entire block, which was completed in early 2014. The Group has also agreed to drill one well in the first 3-year exploration phase.

InVenezuela, where TOTAL has had operations since 1980, the Group’s production was 48 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 50 kboe/d in 2012 and 54 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL has equity stakes in PetroCedeño (30.3%), which produces and upgrades extra heavy oil in the Orinoco Belt, in Yucal Placer (69.5%), which produces gas dedicated to the domestic market, and in the offshore exploration Block 4, located in Plataforma Deltana (49%). The development phase of the southern zone of the PetroCedeño field, which started in 2011, is continuing with forty-three producing wells having been drilled at the end of 2013. The postponement of a debottlenecking project in addition with a performance study performed on the field in 2013 led to a revision of PetroCedeño’s reserves. Pursuant to an amendment to the gas sale contract, a new development phase of the Yucal Placer field, which is expected to boost the production capacity from 100 Mcf/d to 300 Mcf/d, was launched in June 2012.

Asia-Pacific

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in Asia-Pacific was 235 kboe/d, representing 10% of the Group’s total production, compared to 221 kboe/d in 2012 and 231 kboe/d in 2011.

InAustralia, the Group produced 4 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 5 kboe/d in 2012 and 4 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL has held leasehold rights in the country since 2005. The Group owns 30% of the Ichthys project, 27.5% of the Gladstone LNG project (GLNG), and nine offshore exploration licenses off the northwest coast in the Browse, Bonaparte and Carnarvon basins, including five that it operates, as well as four onshore shale gas exploration licenses in the southern part of the South Georgina basin. The acquisition of the fourth license located in the Northern Territory remains subject to the approval of authorities.

In early 2013, TOTAL acquired an additional 6% in the Ichthys project, increasing its stake to 30%. This project, launched in early 2012, is aimed at the development of the Ichthys gas and condensates field located in the Browse basin. This development includes a floating platform designed for gas production, treatment and export, an FPSO (with a maximum capacity of 100 kb/d of condensates) to stabilize and export condensates, an 889 km gas pipeline and an onshore liquefaction plant (capacities of 8.4 Mt/y of LNG and 1.6 Mt/y of NGL) located in Darwin. The LNG has already been sold mainly to Asian buyers under long-term contracts. Production start-up is expected at year-end 2016.

TOTAL has an indirect interest of 27.5% in the GLNG project. This integrated gas production, transport and liquefaction project is based on the development of coal gas from the Fairview, Roma, Scotia and Arcadia fields. The final investment decision was made in early 2011 and start-up is

expected in 2015. LNG production is expected to eventually reach 7.2 Mt/y. The upstream development of the project and the construction of the gas pipeline and liquefaction plant are underway.

In June 2013, the WA-492 and WA-493 licenses in the Carnarvon basin were awarded to TOTAL (100%, operator). TOTAL has undertaken to conduct a 2D seismic survey on these licenses during the coming years.

At the end of 2012, TOTAL reduced its share in the WA-408 license located in the Browse basin (50%, operator) by disposing of 50% of its stake to partners. Two exploration wells were drilled in 2013. The first well, Bassett West 1, which was drilled during the first half of 2013, highlighted hydrocarbons. Studies are currently underway. The second one, which was completed at the end of 2013, has been definitively abandoned due to the negative results obtained.

In 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement to enter four shale gas exploration licenses in the South Georgina basin in the center of the country. This agreement, which allows TOTAL to increase its stake to 68% and become the operator in the event of development, has now been finalized. Work started on the three blocks in Queensland during the course of 2013 in the form of a 2D seismic survey that was acquired during the second half of the year. The first exploration wells are due to be drilled during 2014.

Two wells were drilled in 2011 on the WA-403 license (60%, operator) in the Bonaparte basin. As one well demonstrated the presence of hydrocarbons, additional appraisal work was performed on this block during 2013, including a 3D seismic survey, the results of which are currently being interpreted.

InBrunei, where TOTAL has been present since 1986, the Group operates the offshore Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam gas and condensates field located on Block B (37.5%). The Group’s production in 2013 was 13 kboe/d compared to 12 kboe/d in 2012 and 13 kboe/d in 2011. The gas is delivered to the Brunei LNG liquefaction plant.

The study of the development project started in 2010 for the production of the new reserves discovered in the south of the field (Maharaja Lela South) was finalized in 2013. The project was officially launched in early 2014 with the execution of most of the related industrial contracts and with the formal signature of the20-year extension of the present petroleum contract.

Studies are currently being conducted to reassess the potential of deep-offshore exploration Block CA1 (54%, operator) and are expected to result in a new operating strategy. In addition, discussions have started in the perspective of possible unitization with regards to the hydrocarbon identified in the southeast part of the block (Jagus East well) in 2012 and the discovery made by BSP (Geronggong) in a neighboring block.

InChina, TOTAL has been present since 2006 on the South Sulige Block located in the Ordos basin in the Inner Mongolia province. Following appraisal work by TOTAL, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and TOTAL agreed to a development plan pursuant to which CNPC is the operator and TOTAL has a 49% stake. The first development wells have been drilled and test-phase production has been underway since August 2012. The Group’s production in 2013 was 8 kboe/d compared to 1 kboe/d in 2012.

In March 2013, TOTAL and Sinopec concluded a joint study agreement relating to shale gas potential on the Xuancheng license (4,000 km2) close to Nanjing. 2D seismic survey activities have been realized from October 2013 to February 2014 (600 km). A drilling campaign is scheduled for 2014 and 2015. If the results

22TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

of this campaign are favorable, an agreement relating to thelong-term development of these resources might subsequently be negotiated with Sinopec.

InIndonesia, where TOTAL has had operations since 1968, the Group’s production in 2013 was 131 kboe/d compared to 132 kboe/d in 2012 and 158 kboe/d in 2011.

TOTAL’s operations in Indonesia are primarily concentrated on the Mahakam permit (50%, operator), which covers in particular the Peciko and Tunu gas fields. TOTAL also has a stake in the Sisi-Nubi gas field (47.9%, operator). The Group delivers most of its natural gas production to the Bontang LNG plant. The overall capacity of the eight liquefaction trains at this plant is 22 Mt/y.

In 2013, TOTAL’s gas production operations amounted to 1,757 Mcf/d. This value is down from the 2012 production level (1,871 Mcf/d) due to the maturity of most of the fields on the Mahakam permit, even though this decline was partially offset in 2013 by an increase in production in the South Mahakam fields. The gas operated and delivered by TOTAL accounted for approximately 80% of Bontang’s LNG supply. This gas production is supplemented by condensate and oil production from the Handil and Bekapai fields, which are operated by the Group.

With regard to the Mahakam permit:

On the Tunu field, in 2013, additional development wells were drilled in the main reservoir alongside in the shallow gas reservoirs.

On the Peciko field, Phase 7 drilling, which started in 2009, is continuing.

provinceOn South Mahakam, where production started in 2012 and which contains the Stupa, West Stupa and East Mandu condensate gas fields, other development wells are currently being drilled.

On the Sisi-Nubi field, which began production in 2007, drilling operations are continuing within the framework of Missan, northa second phase of Basra.development. The agreement became effectivegas from Sisi-Nubi is produced through Tunu’s processing facilities.

On the Sebuku license (15%), production started at the Ruby gas field in October 2013. Production capacity is estimated at 100 Mcf/d. Ruby’s production is transported by pipeline for processing and separation at the Senipah terminal operated by TOTAL.

On the Sageri exploration Block (50%), the first exploration well (Lempuk-1X), completed in early 2012, produced negative results. The license is currently being relinquished.

On the South East Mahakam exploration Block (50%, operator), the Tongkol South-1 exploration well, completed in September 2013, produced negative results.

In 2013, TOTAL took the necessary steps vis-à-vis the authorities to withdraw from the Sadang (30%), Arafura Sea (24.5%) and Amborip VI (24.5%) Blocks. In addition, and following the withdrawal of the other partners, the Group’s stake in the South Sageri Block increased from 45% to 100% (operator), while its share in the South Mandar Block increased from 33% to 49.3%.

In February 2013, TOTAL sold 10% in the South West Bird’s Head exploration Block (90%, operator). This block is located onshore and offshore in the Salawati basin in the province of West Papua. Results from the Anggrek Hitam 1 exploration well, where drilling was completed in September 2013, were negative.

In 2012, TOTAL acquired a 100% stake in the exploration Block Bengkulu I — Mentawai in the offshore Bengkulu basin, southwest of Sumatra. The preparatory work on the Rendang 1 exploration well started at the end of 2013 and drilling start-up is planned during the first half of 2014. The

Group also acquired a stake in the exploration Block Telen (100%, operator) in the offshore Kutai basin in East Kalimantan province.

In 2011, the Group acquired an 18.4% stake in a coal bed methane (CBM) block on Kutai II in East Kalimantan province as well as a 50% stake in the similar Kutai Timur Block.

InMalaysia, on deep-offshore exploration Block SK 317 B (85%, operator), which is located in Sarawak, an exploration well was started in December 2013. Following disappointing geological exploration results, TOTAL withdrew from the PM303 offshore exploration block at the start of 2011 and should do the same for the PM324 license (50%, operator) in May 2014 upon expiration of the operating period. An agreement has been reached with the regulator to convert the second commitment well on PM324 into expenditures on other exploration blocks.

InMyanmar, Group production in 2013 was 16 kboe/d compared to 16 kboe/d in 2012 and 15 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL is the operator of the Yadana field (31.2%). This field, which is located on offshore Blocks M5 and M6, primarily produces gas for delivery to PTT (the Thai state-owned company) for use in Thai power plants. The Yadana field also supplies the domestic market via two pipelines built and operated by MOGE, a Myanmar state-owned company.

In 2012, TOTAL acquired a 40% share in a production sharing agreement on the M-11 offshore Block in the Martaban basin. The first exploration well, Manizawta-1, drilled in 2013 is dry.

InPapua New Guinea, TOTAL acquired in 2012 a 40% stake in the PPL234 and PPL244 offshore permits, as well as 50% in the PRL10 offshore permit and an option for 35% of the PPL338 and PPL339 onshore permits. The results of two exploration wells drilled on PPL244 are unsuccessful. An onshore 2D seismic survey was also conducted in 2013.

In March 2014, TOTAL acquired a stake in Block PRL-15 (40.1%) and an option to acquire an interest in exploration BlocksPPL-474, PPL-475, PPL-476 and PPL-477 and in the Triceratops discovery (PRL-39) located in the same zone. The government of Papua New Guinea retains the right to back-in for 22.5% when the final decision is made. In such scenario, TOTAL will hold a 31.1% participating interest when the final decision is made. Block PRL-15 contains two major discoveries: Elk and Antelope.

In thePhilippines, TOTAL has held since 2012 a 75% stake in the SC56 license in the southern Sulu Sea. The program of operations includes the refurbishment of older seismic lines and a new seismic campaign that was realized at the beginning of 2013. The collected data is currently being interpreted.

InThailand, the Group’s production in 2013 was 63 kboe/d compared to 55 kboe/d in 2012 and 41 kboe/d in 2011. This production comes from the Bongkot (33.33%) offshore gas and condensates field. PTT purchases all of the natural gas and condensates production from this field.

In the northern portion of the Bongkot field, new investments are in progress to allow gas demand to be met and plateau production to be maintained:

phase 3J (two wellhead platforms) was launched as scheduled in 2012;

phase 3K (two wellhead platforms) was launched as scheduled in 2013;

phase 3L (two wellhead platforms) was approved in 2012 with start-up scheduled for 2014;

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.23


Item 4 - Business Overview

phase 3M (four wellhead platforms) was approved in March 20102013 with start-up scheduled for 2015; and

the preliminaryfourth series of low-pressure compressors, which make it possible to boost gas production, was approved in 2012 and start-up is expected in late 2014.

The southern portion of the field (Greater Bongkot South) is also being developed in several phases. This development is designed to include a processing platform, a residential platform and thirteen production platforms:

phase 4A (six well platforms) was launched as scheduled in 2012;

phase 4B (four well platforms) is continuing and start-up is scheduled for 2014; and

development of phase 4C (three well platforms) will take place following the other two phases.

The exploration on these licenses continues with the drilling of several wells every year (seven in 2013).

InVietnam, the Group no longer possesses any exploration asset following the sale in August 2013 of its stake in offshore Block 15-1/05 (35%).

Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in the CIS was 227 kboe/d, representing 10% of total Group production, compared to 195 kboe/d in 2012 and 119 kboe/d in 2011.

InAzerbaijan, where TOTAL has been present since 1996 on the Shah Deniz field (10%), production amounted to 20 kboe/d in 2013 and has been growing regularly year-on-year since 2010. TOTAL also has a 10% stake in the South Caucasus Pipeline Company (SCP) gas pipeline, which transports the gas produced at Shah Deniz to the Turkish and Georgian markets. TOTAL also holds a 5% stake in the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline, which connects Baku and the Mediterranean Sea and, among other functions, evacuates the condensates from the gas transported from Shah Deniz.

Gas deliveries to Turkey and Georgia continued throughout 2013, at a lower pace for Turkey due to weaker demand than initially expected. As in 2012, however, the Azerbaijan state-owned SOCAR continued to take greater quantities of gas than provided for by the agreement, thus making it possible for the facilities to operate at maximum capacity.

Following the agreements signed in 2011 regarding the sale of additional gas volumes to Turkey and the transfer conditions for volumes intended for the European market, the final investment decision concerning the second phase of development at Shah Deniz was made in December 2013. In September 2013, gas sales agreements representing a total volume of 10 Gm3/y were signed with European buyers. These volumes are expected to be transported from 2021 through Turkey via the Trans Anatolian pipeline (TANAP) within the framework of a project headed by SOCAR, and via the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) that is expected to link Turkey to Italy and in which TOTAL acquired a 10% stake in July 2013.

With regard to the Absheron Block in the Caspian Sea, TOTAL (40%) is the operator during the exploration phase and a joint operating company will manage operations during the development and production phase. A discovery and commerciality declaration was filed in 2012 following a significant discovery in 2011. The development plan for the field is currently being prepared. Discussions are underway for the construction of a drilling rig in the Caspian Sea in order to prepare for the development of this discovery.

InKazakhstan, TOTAL has been active since 1992 through its 16.81% stake in the North Caspian license, which covers the Kashagan field in particular.

The Kashagan project is expected to develop the field in several phases. Production from the first phase (300 kb/d) started on September 11, 2013 and was first halted on September 24, 2013, and then, after having been restarted, a second time on October 9, 2013, due to leaks detected on the gas export pipeline. Investigations are underway in order to identify the origin of these technical malfunctions and to allow production to resume rapidly.

In November 2012, TOTAL acquired a 75% share in the North and South Nurmunai onshore exploration blocks. These two blocks cover an area of 14,600 km2 and are located in the southwest of the country. A 2D seismic survey was conducted on each of these blocks in 2013. The data is currently being interpreted and a well is planned to be drilled in 2014.

InRussia, where TOTAL has had operations through its subsidiary since 1991, the Group’s production in 2013 was 207 kboe/d compared to 179 kboe/d in 2012 and 105 kboe/d in 2011. This production comes from the Kharyaga field and from TOTAL’s stake in the Russian company Novatek, which is listed in Moscow and London.

On the Kharyaga field (40%, operator), work related to the development plan for Phases 3 and 4 is ongoing. This plan aims to maintain plateau oil production above 30 kboe/d. Phase 3 is expected to be completed in 2015 with the end of the flaring of the associated gas.

In compliance with the strategic partnership agreement signed in 2011 with Novatek, TOTAL continued to increase its share in Novatek to 16.9636% as of December 31, 2013 and intends to further increase its share up to 19.4%.

TOTAL is currently participating in two projects with Novatek:

Termokarstovoye: This onshore deposit of gas and condensates is located in the Yamalo-Nenets district. The development and production license for the Termokarstovoye field is owned by ZAO Terneftegas, a joint venture between Novatek (51%) and TOTAL (49%). Development of this field started in late 2011, with production start-up being expected for mid-2015 at a capacity of 65 kboe/d.

Yamal LNG: The aim of this project, which has been declared to be of national interest by Russian authorities, is to develop the South Tambey gas and condensates field in the Yamal Peninsula and to construct a three-train gas liquefaction plant with an LNG production capacity of 16.5 Mt/y. The first production is expected late 2017. The LNG produced is intended for sale in Europe and Asia using ice-class LNG tankers. The final investment decision was made in December 2013. The company Yamal LNG is jointly-owned by Novatek (60%), TOTAL (20%) and, as of January 2014, CNPC (20%).

In January 2014, Novatek increased its stake in the company Severenergia (production of 100 kb/d in 2013) by acquiring ENI’s shares through the company Arcticgaz (50/50 Joint venture between Novatek and Gazpromneft). In December 2013, Novatek exchanged its interest held in Sibneftegas for the entirety of Rosneft’s interests in Severenergia. Since June 2013, Novatek has held a 50 % stake in the Nortgaz field.

In 2013, TOTAL undertook conceptual studies showing that new technical solutions could allow a viable development of the Shtokman field. Discussions with Gazprom for further studies are required to find a

24TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

technical, contractual and economically viable solution for the development of the Shtokman field.

InTajikistan, TOTAL acquired a 33.3% stake in the Bocktar Block in the first half of 2013. The agreement represents the start of TOTAL’s activity in the country. Environmental and societal studies started at the beginning of 2014. The first phase of a seismic campaign covering 800 km is due to start in 2014, with initial drilling operations planned for late 2015.

Europe

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in Europe was 392 kboe/d, representing 17% of the Group’s overall production, compared to 427 kboe/d in 2012 and 512 kboe/d in 2011.

InBulgaria, the Khan Asparuh license, which covers 14,220 km2 in the Black Sea, was awarded to TOTAL in 2012. In March 2013, TOTAL sold 60% of its stake and has retained 40% of this block. TOTAL will be the operator as of April 2014. A 2D and 3D seismic survey was performed from June 2013 to January 2014. The data is due to be processed and interpreted in 2014 in order to define drilling objectives in 2015 and 2016.

InCyprus, TOTAL has been present since February 2013 in the deep-offshore exploration Blocks 10 (100%, operator) and 11 (100%, operator) located southwest of the country. A 3D seismic survey was completed on Block 11 in 2013. A 2D seismic survey on Block 10 started in February 2014.

InDenmark, TOTAL has, since 2010, owned an 80% stake in and the operatorship of licenses 1/10 (Nordjylland) and 2/10 (Nordsjaelland, formerly Frederoskilde). These onshore licenses, of which the shale gas potential continues to be assessed, cover areas of 3,000 km² and 2,300 km², respectively. Following geoscience surveys on license 1/10 in 2011, the decision was made to drill a well. Initially planned for 2013, this well is now scheduled for 2014 due to additional environmental studies requested by the local authorities. Geoscience studies are ongoing on license 2/10 and a gravimetry acquisition was made in 2013.

InFrance, the Group’s production in 2013 was 9 kboe/d compared to 13 kboe/d in 2012 and 18 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL’s major assets are the Lacq (100%) and Meillon (100%) gas fields, located in the southwest part of the country.

On the Lacq field, which started production in 1957, a carbon dioxide capture, injection and storage pilot was commissioned in 2010. In connection with this project, a boiler was modified to operate in an oxy-fuel combustion environment and the CO2 emitted was captured and re-injected in the depleted Rousse field. As part of TOTAL’s Sustainable Development policy, this project allowed the Group to assess one of the technological possibilities for reducing CO2 emissions. Most of the objectives of the experiment having been reached, the injection of CO2came to an end in the first quarter of 2013. As anticipated, TEPF ended the operations on Lacq in October 2013.

The sale agreements of Itteville, Vert-le-Grand, Vert-le-Petit and La Croix Blanche assets were signed in 2011, while those of Dommartin Lettrée, Vic-Bilh, Lacq, Lagrave and Pécorade assets were signed in 2012. The approval of the authorities has been obtained for the sale of all of these licenses, with the exception of the Lacq asset, for which approval is expected to be granted in 2014.

The Montélimar exclusive exploration license awarded to TOTAL in 2010 to assess, in particular, the shale gas potential of the area, was revoked by the government in October 2011. This revocation

stemmed from the law of July 13, 2011, prohibiting the exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons by drilling followed by hydraulic fracturing. The Group had submitted the required report to the government in which it undertook not to use hydraulic fracturing in light of the current prohibition. An appeal filed in December 2011 with the administrative court requesting that the judge cancel the revocation of the license is still pending.

InItaly, TOTAL holds a stake in two exploration licenses and has an interest in the Tempa Rossa field (50%, operator), discovered in 1989 and located on the Gorgoglione concession (Basilicate region). Although preparation work started in 2008, the proceedings initiated by the Prosecutor of the Potenza Court against Total Italia led to a freeze in the preparation work (for additional information on this dispute, see“Item 8. Legal or arbitration proceedings — Italy”). After resuming the preparation work, the final investment decision was made in July 2012 and production start-up is expected for 2016 at a capacity of 55 kboe/d. Following a call for tenders, all the civil engineering and construction contracts were awarded in 2012 and are currently in progress. The Gorgoglione 2 well was tested in 2012 and confirmed the results obtained from the other wells. The drilling of a sidetrack at well TR-2 started in November 2013.

In March 2013, TOTAL finalized an agreement to sell 25% of the stake acquired in Tempa Rossa in 2011. This transfer, which reduced the Group’s holding from 75% to 50%, took place in June 2013 following the approval of the Italian authorities.

InNorway, where the Group has had operations since the mid-1960s, TOTAL has equity stakes in 104 production licenses on the Norwegian continental shelf, 31 of which it operates. In 2013, the Group’s production was 243 kboe/d, with 74 kboe/d from the Greater Ekofisk Area located in the southern sector of the North Sea, 103 kboe/d from the central and northern portions of the North Sea and 66 kboe/d from the Haltenbanken region (in the Norwegian Sea) and the Barents Sea. The Group’s production in Norway in 2012 was 275 kboe/d and 287 kboe/d in 2011. The decrease in production between 2011 and 2013 was mainly due to the decline of mature fields. Production should increase again and reach a level of around 300 kboe/d at the horizon 2017 with the start-up of several new fields, the developments of which have already been launched (Martin Linge, Ekofisk South, Eldfisk II).

In the Norwegian North Sea, the most substantial contribution to the Group’s production, which is for the most partnon-operated, comes from the Greater Ekofisk Area (e.g., Ekofisk, Eldfisk, Embla).

In the southern Norwegian North Sea:

In the Greater Ekofisk Area, the Group owns a 39.9% stake in the Ekofisk and Eldfisk fields. The Ekofisk South and Eldfisk 2 projects, each with a capacity of 70 kboe/d, were launched in 2011. Production at Ekofisk South started in October 2013, while start-up at Eldfisk 2 is expected in early 2015. The project relating to the construction and installation of the new Ekofisk accommodation and field services center platform has now been completed and the accommodation has been operational as of November 2013.

In the central part of the Norwegian North Sea:

Gas production start-up at the Atla field, located on license PL102C (40%, operator) and Beta West field (10%), a satellite of Sleipner, took place in October 2012 and April 2011, respectively.

The development of the Gina Krog structure (38%), formerly known as Dagny and located to the north of

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.25


Item 4 - Business Overview

Sleipner, was approved in 2013. Production start-up is planned for 2017.

On license PL036D (24.24%), the fast-track development of Vilje South was launched in 2011. Production start-up is expected in March 2014.

In the northern part of the Norwegian North Sea:

The Islay field (100%, operator) was put into production in 2012. This field extends on each side of the Norwegian/Great Britain border and the Group’s interest in the Norwegian part is 5.51%.

The Stjerne field, located on license PL104 (14.7%), and Visund South field, located on license PL120 (7.7%), were put into production in July 2013 and November 2012, respectively.

On license PL120 (7.7%), the fast-track development of Visund North, which started in late 2011, made it possible to start production on the field in November 2013.

On the Greater Hild Area (51%, operator), located in the north, the Martin Linge development scheme was approved by the Iraqi authorities in September 2010. Development operations started2012, with the shootingproduction start-up scheduled end 2016 at an estimated capacity of 80 kboe/d.

The Oseberg Delta phase 2 project (14.7%), located on production licenses PL104 and PL79, was approved by the authorities in October 2013 and production start-up is planned for 2015.

In the Norwegian Sea, the Haltenbanken area includes the Tyrihans (23.2%), Linnorm (20%), Mikkel (7.7%) and Kristin (6%) fields as well as the Åsgard field (7.7%) and its satellites Yttergryta (24.5%) and Morvin (6%).

The Åsgard sub-sea compression project, which will increase hydrocarbon recovery on the Åsgard and Mikkel fields, was approved by the Norwegian authorities in 2012. All the main contracts have been awarded.

Development of the Linnorm gas field is still under study following the lower than expected results obtained at the Onyx South exploration well, which was drilled in 2013. It was planned to export the gas from Linnorm to the Nyhamna onshore terminal by installing a new pipeline (Polarled project).

The Polarled project (5.11%) was approved in December 2012. The project consists of the installation of a 481 km long pipeline from the Aasta Hansen field to the Nyhamna terminal and in the expansion of the terminal.

In the Barents Sea, a project intended to improve the performance of the Snøhvit liquefaction plant (18.4%, capacity of 4.2 Mt/y) was launched in 2012. This plant is supplied with gas from the Snøhvit, Albatross and Askeladd fields.

Several exploration wells were successfully drilled on a number of licenses during the 2011-2013 period and revealed the presence of hydrocarbons at the structures of Smørbukk North (PL479, 7.68%) and Rhea (PL120, 7.68%) in 2013, Garantiana (PL554, 40%, operator) and King Lear (PL146 and 333, 22.2%) in 2012, and Alve North (PL127, 50%, operator) and Norvarg (PL535, 40%, operator) in 2011. The Novarg appraisal well drilled in 2013 confirmed the presence of gas in the structure, but the well results, which are under study as of December 31, 2013, are below expectations.

In addition, the Group is continuing to optimize its asset portfolio in Norway by obtaining new licenses and divesting a number of non-strategic assets.

In theNetherlands, TOTAL has had natural gas exploration and production operations since 1964 and currently owns twenty-four offshore production licenses, including twenty that it operates, and two offshore exploration licenses, E17c (16.92%) and K1c (30%). In 2013, the Group’s production was 35 kboe/d compared to 33 kboe/d in 2012 and 38 kboe/d in 2011.

Following the acquisition of additional stakes at the end of 2013, TOTAL now holds 50% stakes in Block K5b and 60% in Blocks K1b/K2a and K2c. TOTAL is the operator of these three blocks.

A 3D seismic survey of several offshore permits covering an area of 3,500 km2 was conducted in 2012. The results of this campaign are currently being interpreted.

The development project K4-Z (50%, operator) started production in August 2013. This development project was launched in 2011 and consists of two sub-sea wells connected to the existing production and transport facilities.

The L4-D field (55.66%, operator) started production in 2012.

Production from the K5-CU project (49%, operator) started in early 2011.

InPoland, at the beginning of 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement to acquire a 49% stake in the Chelm and Werbkowice exploration concessions in order to assess their shale gas potential. A well was drilled and tested on the Chelm permit in 2011. The results from the well were analyzed in 2012 and 2013. In December 2013, following the departure of the operator, TOTAL increased its stake to 100% and became the operator of this permit. In 2012, the Werbkowice permit was relinquished.

In theUnited Kingdom, where TOTAL has had operations since 1962, the Group’s production in 2013 was 105 kboe/d compared to 106 kboe/d in 2012 and 169 kboe/d in 2011. About 90% of production comes from operated fields located in two major zones: the Alwyn zone in the northern North Sea, and the Elgin/Franklin zone in the Central Graben. In 2012, the shutdown of the Elgin, Franklin and West Franklin fields, due to a gas leak from well G4 in Elgin, severely impacted production. Production at these three fields was resumed in March 2013.

In the Alwyn zone (100%), the start-up of satellite fields or new reservoir compartments made it possible to compensate in part for the natural decline in production potential. Consequently, wells N54 and N53 were put into production in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Well N55, which was drilled in 2012 in the Brent South West panel, is expected to be put into production in the middle of 2014.

On the Dunbar field (100%), a new drilling campaign (Dunbar phase IV) is due to begin during the second quarter 2014 and is expected to include three work-overs and six new wells.

The Islay field (100%, operator) was put into production in 2012. This field extends on each side of the Norwegian/Great Britain border and the Group’s interest in the UK portion is 94.49%.

In 2012, TOTAL finalized the divestment of its stake in the Otter field.

In Central Graben, TOTAL increased its stake in Elgin Franklin Oil & Gas (EFOG), a company through which it holds an interest in the Elgin and Franklin fields (46.2%, operator), from 77.5% to 100% at the end of 2011. Production at the Elgin, Franklin and West Franklin fields was stopped following a gas leak on the Elgin field in March 2012. In May 2012, TOTAL confirmed that the leak from well G4 had been successfully stopped and, at the end of October 2012, well G4 was definitively secured by installing five cement plugs. The

26TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

enquiry led by TOTAL permitted the clear identification of the causes of the accident and the constructiondefinition of surface facilities. Anew criteria for well integrity to allow the resumption of production at Elgin/Franklin in total safety. Production in the Elgin/Franklin area resumed in March 2013 following the approval of the safety case by the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Production has gradually risen to 55 kboe/d (approximately 25 kboe/d on the Group’s account), representing 40% of the production potential of these fields. In order to recover the production level expected before the Elgin incident by 2015, a redevelopment project envisaging the drilling of 70 kb/d of oilnew infill wells on Elgin and Franklin started in July 2013. Drilling work is expecteddue to be reachedstart on Elgin in early 2015.

In addition, the West Franklin Phase II development project remains ongoing with production start-up scheduled for mid-2014.

In addition to Alwyn and the Central Graben, a third area, west of Shetland, is undergoing development. This area covers the fields of Laggan and Tormore (80%, operator) and the P967 license (50%, operator), which includes the Tobermory gas discovery. The decision to develop the Laggan and Tormore fields was made in 2010 and production is scheduled to start in 2014 with an expected capacity of 90 kboe/d. The development scheme includes: sub-sea production facilities; off-gas treatment (gas and condensates) at a plant located near the Sullom Voe terminal in the Shetland Islands, 150 km away; and a new gas pipeline connected to the Frigg gas line (FUKA) for the export of gas to the Saint Fergus terminal.

In early 2011, a gas and condensate discovery was made on the Edradour East license (75%, operator) near Laggan and Tormore. The decision to develop Edradour East using the existing infrastructure was made at the end of 2012. The Edradour development scheme is currently being optimized in order to include other possible fields in the same zone. Next to the Edradour East discovery, a second well (Spinnaker) started in September 2013 and is currently being drilled.

TOTAL also holds a stake in three assets operated by other parties: the Bruce (43.25%), Keith (25%), and Markham (7.35%) fields. The Group’s stakes in other fields operated by third parties (Seymour, Alba, Armada, Maria, Moira, Mungo/Monan and Everest) were sold off in 2012.

Nine new licenses (three in the northern North Sea, three in Central Graben and three in West Shetland) were awarded to TOTAL in 2012 during the twenty-seventh exploration round.

Early 2014, TOTAL acquired a 40% stake in two shale gas exploration licenses (PEDL 139 et 140) located in the Gainsborough Trough basin of the East Midlands, and signed an agreement that permits the Group to acquire a 50% stake in the licence PEDL 209 located in the same area.

Middle East

In 2013, TOTAL’s production in the Middle East was 536 kboe/d, representing 23% of the Group’s production, compared to 493 kboe/d in 2012 and 570 kboe/d in 2011.

In theUnited Arab Emirates, where TOTAL has had operations since 1939, the Group’s production in 2013 was 260 kboe/d compared to 246 kboe/d in 2012 and 240 kboe/d in 2011. In 2013, the country maintained a steady rhythm of production which

led to an increase in TOTAL’s share of production. The increase in production in 2013 was mainly due to higher production by Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations (ADCO).

TOTAL holds a 75% stake (operator) in the Abu Al Bu Khoosh field, a 9.5% stake in ADCO, which operates the five major onshore fields in Abu Dhabi, and a 13.3% stake in Abu Dhabi Marine (ADMA), which operates two offshore fields. TOTAL also has a 15% stake in Abu Dhabi Gas Industries (GASCO), which produces NGL (natural gas liquids) and condensates from the associated gas produced by ADCO as well as from the gas and condensates and associated gases produced by ADMA. TOTAL also has a 5% stake in Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company (ADGAS), which processes the associated gas produced by ADMA in order to produce LNG, NGL and condensates, and further possesses a 5% holding in National Gas Shipping Company (NGSCO), which owns eight LNG tankers and exports the LNG produced by ADGAS.

The ADCO license expired in January 2014 and the Abu Dhabi authorities have issued a call for tenders for the renewal of the license as of January 1, 2015.

The Group holds a 24.5% stake in Dolphin Energy Ltd. in partnership with Mubadala, a company owned by the government of Abu Dhabi, in order to market gas produced in Qatar primarily to the United Arab Emirates.

The Group also owns 33.33% of Ruwais Fertilizer Industries (FERTIL), which produces urea. The FERTIL 2 project was started in July 2013 and enabled FERTIL to more than double its production capacity to 2 Mt/y.

InIraq, the Group’s production was 7 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 6 kboe/d on average for the year 2012. TOTAL holds an 18.75% stake in the consortium that was awarded the development and production contract for the Halfaya field in the Missan province. Production of Phase 1 of the project, which has a capacity of 100 kb/d, started in June 2012. Phase 2, under construction, is expected to increase the production up to 200 kb/d by the end of 2014. The definitive development plan, which is expected to make it possible to achieve a plateau of 535 kb/d, was approved by the authorities in August 2013.

In early 2013, TOTAL acquired an 80% stake and became operator of the Baranan exploration Block (729 km2, southeast of Soulaymaniyah, in the Kurdistan area). A 2D seismic survey of 213 km was completed in January 2014. The data of this seismic is expected to result in the drilling of a first exploration well at the end of 2014.

Since 2012, TOTAL has held a 35% stake in the Safen and Harir exploration Blocks (424 km2 and 705 km2, respectively, located to the northeast of Erbil), as well as a 20% stake in the Taza Block (505 km2, located southwest of Sulaymaniyah). During 2013, four exploration wells were drilled and resulted in two discoveries located in the Taza and Harir Blocks. The drilling of five new wells is planned for 2014 on three of these four blocks. In early 2014, TOTAL increased its stake in the Safen Block to 80% and became the operator.

InIran, the Group’s production under buy back agreements was zero in 2011, having been 2 kb/d in 2010 and 8 kb/d in 2009. For additional information on TOTAL’s operations in Iran, see “— Other Matters — Business Activities in Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria”.

InOman, the Group’s production was 36 kboe/d in 2011, stable compared to 2010 and 2009. TOTAL produces oil mainly on Block 6 as well as on Block 53 and liquefied natural gas through its stakes in the Oman LNG (5.54%)/Qalhat LNG (2.04%(1)) liquefaction plant, which has a capacity of 10.5 Mt/y.

InQatar, where TOTAL has had operations since 1936, the Group has had no production since 2010. For further information on TOTAL and Iran, see“— Other Matters — Cuba, Iran and Syria”, below.

InOman, the Group’s production in 2013 was 37 kboe/d, stable compared to 2012 and 2011. TOTAL primarily produces oil on

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.27


Item 4 - Business Overview

Block 6 (4%)(1) as well as on Block 53 (2%)(2), and it also produces LNG through its stake in the Oman LNG (5.54%)/Qalhat LNG (2.04%)(3) liquefaction plant, which has a capacity of 10.5 Mt/y. In December 2013, TOTAL obtained the license for ultra-deep-offshore Block 41.

InQatar, where TOTAL has had operations since 1936, the Group’s production in 2013 was 137 kboe/d compared to 139 kboe/d in 2012 and 155 kboe/d in 2011. The Group has equity stakes in the Al Khalij field (40%), the NFB Block (20%) in the North field and the Qatargas 1 liquefaction plant (10%). The Group also holds a 16.7% stake in train 5 of Qatargas 2.

In 2012, TOTAL and state-owned Qatar Petroleum signed a new agreement to continue their partnership on the Al Khalij field for an additional 25-year period as of 2014. TOTAL will continue to be the operator (40%) alongside Qatar Petroleum (60%).

The production contract for the Dolphin gas project, signed in 2001 with Qatar Petroleum, provides for the sale of 2 Bcf/d of gas from the North Field for a 25-year period. The gas is processed in the Dolphin plant in Ras Laffan and exported to the United Arab Emirates through a 360 km gas pipeline.

The production capacity of train 5 of Qatargas 2 is 8 Mt/y. TOTAL has been a shareholder in this train since 2006. An agreement to share the two liquefaction trains of the Qatargas 2 project (trains 4 and 5) was signed in 2011. The agreement provides for an equal split of the physical production of the two trains as well as of the associated operating costs and capital outlay. In addition, TOTAL offtakes part of the LNG produced in compliance with the contracts signed in 2006, which provide for the purchase of 5.2 Mt/y of LNG from Qatargas 2 by the Group.

The Group became a partner in the offshore BC exploration permit (25%) in 2011. The first exploration well is due to be drilled during the first half of 2014.

InSyria, TOTAL has a 100% stake in the Deir Ez Zor permit, which is operated by the joint-venture company DEZPC in which TOTAL and the state-owned company SPC each have a 50% share. TOTAL also holds the Tabiyeh contract, which came into effect in 2009. The Group had no production in the country in 2013 or in 2012 compared to 53 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL suspended its activities contributing to the production of hydrocarbons in Syria in December 2011, in compliance with the European Union’s regulations regarding this country. For additional information, see“— Other Matters — Cuba, Iran and Syria”, below.

InYemen, where TOTAL has had operations since 1987, the Group’s production was 95 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 65 kboe/d in 2012 and 86 kboe/d in 2011.

TOTAL owns a 39.62% stake in the Yemen LNG liquefaction plant (capacity of 6.7 Mt/y), which is located in Balhaf on the country’s southern coast. This plant is supplied with the gas produced on Block 18, located near Marib in the center of the country, via a 320 km gas pipeline. The Balhaf plant suffered two rocket attacks in December 2013 and January 2014, but production was not impacted because one of the rockets resulted in slight damage and the other landed in the sea. Security measures have since been adopted due to the evolving risks.

TOTAL also has stakes in two oil basins, as the operator of Block 10 (Masila Basin, East Shabwa license, 28.57%) and as a partner on Block 5 (Marib basin, Jannah license, 15%).

TOTAL owns stakes in five onshore exploration licenses: 40% in Blocks 69 and 71, 50.1% in Block 70 (operator); 36% in Block 72 (operator); and 40% in Block 3 (operator).

(1)

TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 4% in Petroleum Development Oman LLC, operator of Block 6, via its 10% interest in via Pohol (equity affiliate).

(2)

TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 2% in Block 53.

(3)

TOTAL’s indirect stake in Qalhat LNG through its stake in Oman LNG.

28TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

OIL AND GAS ACREAGE

As of December 31,

(in thousands of acres atyear-end)

 2013  2012  2011 
   Undeveloped
acreage
(a)
  Developed
acreage
  Undeveloped
acreage
(a)
  Developed
acreage
  Undeveloped
acreage
(a)
  Developed
acreage
 

Europe

 Gross  10,804    722    10,015    724    6,478    781  
  Net  5,305    163    6,882    176    3,497    185  

Africa

 Gross  134,157    1,266    135,610    1,256    110,346    1,229  
  Net  86,493    341    88,457    337    65,391    333  

Americas

 Gross  19,790    960    16,604    1,705    15,454    1,028  
  Net  9,391    286    6,800    330    5,349    329  

Middle East

 Gross  33,242    1,482    32,369    1,896    31,671    1,461  
  Net  4,534    192    3,082    256    2,707    217  

Asia

 Gross  55,980    1,064    37,208    955    40,552    930  
  Net  29,880    309    18,184    270    19,591    255  

Total

 Gross  253,973    5,494    231,806    6,536    204,501    5,429  
  Net(b)  135,603    1,291    123,405    1,369    96,535    1,319  

(a)

Undeveloped acreage includes leases and concessions.

(b)

Net acreage equals the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross acreage.

NUMBER OF PRODUCTIVE WELLS

As of December 31,

(wells at year-end)

  2013 
    Gross
productive
wells
   Net
productive
wells
(a)
 

Europe

  Oil   403     106  
   Gas   286     87  

Africa

  Oil   2,269     615  
   Gas   156     48  

Americas

  Oil   868     266  
   Gas   3,311     634  

Middle East

  Oil   6,283     441  
   Gas   295     36  

Asia

  Oil   229     81  
   Gas   2,306     741  

Total

  Oil   10,052     1,509  
   Gas   6,354     1,546  

(a)

Net well equal the Al Khalij field (100%),sum of the NFB Block (20%)Group’s equity stakes in gross wells.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.29


Item 4 - Business Overview

NUMBER OF NET PRODUCTIVE AND DRY WELLS DRILLED

As of December 31,

(wells at year-end)

 2013  2012  2011 
   Net
productive
wells
drilled
(a)(b)
  Net dry
wells
drilled
(a)(c)
  Net total
wells
drilled
(a)(c)
  Net
productive
wells
drilled
(a)(b)
  Net  dry
wells
drilled
(a)(c)
  Net total
wells
drilled
(a)(c)
  Net
productive
wells
drilled
(a)(b)
  Net dry
wells
drilled
(a)(c)
  Net total
wells
drilled
(a)(c)
 

Exploratory

 

Europe

  1.5    0.2    1.7    0.9    3.3    4.2    1.5    1.7    3.2  
 

Africa

  1.5    5.1    6.6    4.9    2.8    7.7    2.9    1.5    4.4  
 

Americas

  2.9    1.4    4.3    3.9    0.6    4.5    1.2    1.3    2.5  
 

Middle East

  0.6    0.7    1.3                1.2    0.8    2.0  
 

Asia

  1.6    4.3    5.9    2.4    1.4    3.8    2.1    3.7    5.8  
  

Total

  8.1    11.7    19.8    12.1    8.1    20.2    8.9    9.0    17.9  

Development

 

Europe

  6.9    0.3    7.2    6.0    0.7    6.7    7.5        7.5  
 

Africa

  19.7    0.4    20.1    22.7        22.7    24.7        24.7  
 

Americas

  98.0        98.0    70.6        70.6    113.1        113.1  
 

Middle East

  42.7    0.3    43.0    43.3        43.3    32.6    2.6    35.2  
 

Asia

  198.0        198.0    127.8        127.8    118.4        118.4  
  

Total

  365.3    1.0    366.3    270.4    0.7    271.1    296.3    2.6    298.9  

Total

    373.4    12.7    386.1    282.5    8.8    291.3    305.2    11.6    316.8  

(a)

Net wells equal the sum of the Company’s fractional interests in gross wells.

(b)

Includes certain exploratory wells that were abandoned, but which would have been capable of producing oil in sufficient quantities to justify completion.

(c)

For information: service wells and stratigraphic wells drilled within oil sands operations in Canada are not reported in this table (86.2 wells in 2013, 131.7 in 2012 and 82.2 in 2011).

EXPLORATORY AND DEVELOPMENT WELLS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING DRILLED (INCLUDING WELLS TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED)

As of December 31,     2013 
(wells at year-end)     Gross(a)   Net(a)(b) 

Exploratory

 

Europe

   2     1.5  
 

Africa

   31     9.8  
 

Americas

   15     6.7  
 

Middle East

   10     3.6  
 

Asia

   15     5.7  
  

Total

   73     27.3  

Development

 

Europe

   35     13.4  
 

Africa

   27     7.7  
 

Americas

   348     120.7  
 

Middle East

   129     15.8  
 

Asia

   821     246.1  
  

Total

   1,360     403.7  

Total

     1,433     431.0  

(a)

From 2013, includes drilled wells for which surface facilities permitting production have not yet been constructed. Such wells are also reported in the North field,table “Number of net productive and dry wells drilled”, above, for the Qatargas 1 liquefaction plant (10%), Dolphin (24.5%) and train 5year in which they are drilled.

(b)

Net wells equal the sum of Qatargas 2 (16.7%). Thethe Group’s production was 155 kboe/dequity stakes in 2011, compared to 164 kboe/d in 2010 and 141 kboe/d in 2009.gross wells.

30TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

INTERESTS IN PIPELINES

The table below sets forth TOTAL’s interests in oil and gas pipelines as of December 31, 2013.

 

Pipeline(s)OriginDestination% interestOperatorLiquidsGas

The production contract for Dolphin, signed in 2001 with state-owned Qatar Petroleum, provides for the sale of 2 Bcf/d of gas from the North Field for a 25-year period. The gas is processed in the Dolphin plant in Ras LaffanEUROPE

Norway

Frostpipe (inhibited)Lille-Frigg, FroyOseberg36.25x
Heimdal to Brae Condensate LineHeimdalBrae16.76x
Kvitebjorn pipelineKvitebjornMongstad5.00x
Norpipe OilEkofisk Treatment centerTeeside (UK)34.93x
Oseberg Transport SystemOseberg, Brage and exported to the United Arab Emirates through a 360 km gas pipeline.

Production from train 5 of Qatargas 2, which started in September 2009, reached its full capacity (7.8 Mt/y) at year-end 2009. TOTAL has owned an equity stake in this train since 2006. In addition, TOTAL takes part of the LNG produced in compliance with the contracts signed in 2006, which provide for the purchase of 5.2 Mt/y of LNG from Qatargas 2 by the Group.

The Group also has a 10% stake in Laffan Refinery, a condensate splitter with a capacity of 146 kb/d that started up in September 2009. Finally, since May 2011 the Group has been a partner (25%) in the offshore BC exploration license.

InSyria, TOTAL is present on the Deir Ez Zor license (100%, operated by DEZPC, 50% of which is owned by TOTAL) and through the Tabiyeh contract that became effective in October 2009. The Group’s production from these two assets was 53 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 39 kboe/d in 2010 and 20 kboe/d in 2009. In early December 2011, TOTAL ceased its activities that contribute to oil and gas production in Syria.

For additional information on TOTAL’s operations in Syria, see “— Other Matters — Business Activities in Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria”.

InYemen, where TOTAL has had operations since 1987, the Group’s production was 86 kboe/d in 2011, compared to 66 kboe/d in 2010 and 21 kboe/d in 2009.

TOTAL has an equity stake in the Yemen LNG project (39.62%). As part of this project, the Balhaf liquefaction plant on the southern coast of Yemen is supplied with the gas produced on Block 18, located near Marib in the center of the country, through a 320 km gas pipeline. The two liquefaction trains were commissioned in October 2009 and April 2010, respectively. The plant has a nominal capacity of 6.7 Mt/y of LNG.

TOTAL also has stakes in the country’s two oil basins, as the operator of Block 10 (Masila Basin, East Shabwa license, 28.57%) and as a partner on Block 5 (Marib Basin, Jannah license, 15%).

TOTAL owns stakes in four onshore exploration licenses: 40% in Blocks 69 and 71, 50.1% in Block 70 (operated by TOTAL since July 2010), and 36% in Block 72 (operated by TOTAL since October 2011).

In March 2012, TOTAL acquired a 40% interest in the Block 3 exploration license, which it will operate. The acquisition is subject to the approval of Yemen’s Ministry of Oil and Mineral Resources.

(1)TOTAL’s indirect stake in Qalhat LNG through its stake in Oman LNG.

OIL AND GAS ACREAGE

As of December 31,

(in thousand of acres)

 2011   2010   2009 
       Undeveloped
acreage
(a)
   Developed
acreage
   Undeveloped
acreage
(a)
   Developed
acreage
   Undeveloped
acreage
(a)
   Developed
acreage
 

Europe

  Gross  6,478     781     6,802     776     5,964     667  
   Net  3,497     185     3,934     184     2,203     182  

Africa

  Gross  110,346     1,229     72,639     1,229     85,317     1,137  
   Net  65,391     333     33,434     349     45,819     308  

Americas

  Gross  15,454     1,028     16,816     1,022     9,834     776  
   Net  5,349     329     5,755     319     4,149     259  

Middle East

  Gross  31,671     1,461     29,911     1,396     33,223     204  
   Net  2,707     217     2,324     209     2,415     97  

Asia

  Gross  40,552     930     36,519     539     29,609     397  
   Net  19,591     255     17,743     184     16,846     169  

Total

  Gross  204,501     5,429     162,687     4,962     163,947     3,181  
   Net(b)  96,535     1,319     63,190     1,245     71,432     1,015  

(a)Undeveloped acreage includes leases and concessions.
(b)Net acreage equals the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross acreage.

NUMBER OF PRODUCTIVE WELLS

As of December 31,

(number of wells)

      2011   2010   2009 
        Gross
productive
wells
   Net
productive
wells
(a)
   Gross
productive
wells
   Net
productive
wells
(a)
   Gross
productive
wells
   Net
productive
wells
(a)
 

Europe

  Liquids   576     151     569     151     705     166  
   Gas   358     125     368     132     328     125  

Africa

  Liquids   2,275     576     2,250     628     2,371     669  
   Gas   157     44     182     50     190     50  

Americas

  Liquids   877     247     884     261     821     241  
   Gas   2,707     526     2,532     515     1,905     424  

Middle East

  Liquids   7,829     721     7,519     701     3,766     307  
   Gas   372     49     360     49     136     32  

Asia

  Liquids   209     75     196     75     157     75  
   Gas   1,589     498     1,258     411     1,156     379  

Total

  Liquids   11,766     1,770     11,418     1,816     7,820     1,458  
   Gas   5,183     1,242     4,700     1,157     3,715     1,010  

(a)Net wells equal the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross wells.

NUMBER OF NET OIL AND GAS WELLS DRILLED ANNUALLY

As of December 31,    2011  2010  2009 
      Net
productive
wells
drilled
(a)
  Net
dry  wells
drilled
(a)
  Total net
wells
drilled
(a)
  Net
productive
wells
drilled
(a)
  Net
dry  wells
drilled
(a)
  Total net
productive
wells
drilled
(a)
  Net
wells
drilled
(a)
  Net
dry  wells
drilled
(a)
  Total
net  wells
drilled
(a)
 

Exploratory

 

Europe

  1.5    1.7    3.2    1.7    0.2    1.9    0.4    3.7    4.1  
 

Africa

  2.9    1.5    4.4    1.6    4.3    5.9    5.9    3.2    9.1  
 

Americas

  1.2    1.3    2.5    1.0    1.6    2.6    0.8    1.6    2.4  
 

Middle East

  1.2    0.8    2.0    0.9    0.3    1.2    0.3        0.3  
 

Asia

  2.1    3.7    5.8    3.2    1.2    4.4    1.7    1.2    2.9  
  

Subtotal

  8.9    9.0    17.9    8.4    7.6    16.0    9.1    9.7    18.8  

Development

 

Europe

  7.5        7.5    5.0        5.0    5.0        5.0  
 

Africa

  24.7        24.7    18.1        18.1    27.5    0.2    27.7  
 

Americas

  113.1    82.2    195.3    135.3    112.5    247.8    31.2    104.3    135.5  
 

Middle East

  32.6    2.6    35.2    29.6    1.4    31.0    42.6    3.4    49.0  
 

Asia

  118.4        118.4    59.3        59.3    63.5    0.3    63.8  
  

Subtotal

  296.3    84.8    381.1    247.3    113.9    361.2    172.8    108.2    281.0  

Total

    305.2    93.8    399.0    255.7    121.5    377.2    181.9    117.9    299.8  

(a)Net wells equal the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross wells.

DRILLING AND PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES IN PROGRESS

As of December 31,     2011   2010   2009 
(number  of wells)     Gross   Net(a)   Gross   Net(a)   Gross   Net(a) 

Exploratory

 

Europe

   2     2.0     3     2.1     1     0.5  
 

Africa

   2     0.8     4     1.4     4     1.3  
 

Americas

   3     1.0     2     0.9     2     0.6  
 

Middle East

             2     1.2     1     0.4  
 

Asia

   1     0.6     2     1.1            
  

Subtotal

   8     4.4     13     6.7     8     2.8  

Development

 

Europe

   21     4.5     21     3.8     5     2.2  
 

Africa

   31     11.3     29     6.4     31     8.5  
 

Americas

   22     5.7     99     29.2     60     17.8  
 

Middle East

   26     3.5     20     5.1     40     4.8  
 

Asia

   11     5.1     23     9.8     12     5.5  
  

Subtotal

   111     30.1     192     54.3     148     38.8  

Total

     119     34.5     205     61.0     156     41.6  

(a)Net wells equal the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross wells.

INTERESTS IN PIPELINES

The table below sets forth TOTAL’s interests in oil and gas pipelines as of December 31, 2011.

Pipeline(s)OriginDestination

%

interest

OperatorLiquidsGas

EUROPE

France

TIGF

South West Network100.00xx

Norway

Frostpipe (inhibited)Lille-Frigg, FroyOseberg36.25x
Heimdal to Brae Condensate LineHeimdalBrae16.76x
Kvitebjorn pipelineKvitebjornMongstad5.00x
Norpipe OilEkofisk Treatment centerTeeside (UK)34.93x
Oseberg Transport SystemOseberg, Brage and VeslefrikkSture8.65VeslefrikkSture12.98        x      
Sleipner East Condensate Pipe Sleipner East Karsto  10.00        x      
Troll Oil Pipeline I and II Troll B and C Vestprosess (Mongstad refinery)  3.71        x     
VestprosessKollsnes (Area E)Vestprosess (Mongstad refinery)5.00x

Polared

Asta Hansteen/LinnormNyhamna5.11x  

The Netherlands

                    

Nogat pipeline

 F3-FB Den Helder  5.00x

WGT K13-Den Helder

K13ADen Helder4.66x

WGT K13-Extension

MarkhamK13 (via K4/K5)23.00x

United Kingdom

Alwyn Liquid Export Line

Alwyn NorthCormorant100.00xx

Bruce Liquid Export Line

BruceForties (Unity)43.25x

Central Graben Liquid Export Line (LEP)

Elgin-FranklinETAP15.89x

Frigg System : UK line

Alwyn North, Bruce and othersSt.Fergus (Scotland)100.00xx

Ninian Pipeline System

NinianSullom Voe16.00x

Shearwater Elgin Area Line (SEAL)

Elgin-Franklin, ShearwaterBacton25.73x

SEAL to Interconnector Link (SILK)

BactonInterconnector54.66xx

AFRICA

Gabon

Mandji Pipes

Mandji fieldsCap Lopez Terminal100.00(a)xx

Rabi Pipes

Rabi fieldsCap Lopez Terminal100.00(a)xx

AMERICAS

Argentina

Gas Andes

Neuquén Basin (Argentina)Santiago (Chile)56.50xx

TGN

Network (Northern Argentina)15.40x

TGM

TGNUruguyana (Brazil)32.68x

Bolivia

Transierra

Yacuiba (Bolivia)Rio Grande (Bolivia)11.00x

Brazil

TBG

Bolivia-Brazil borderPorto Alegre via São Paulo9.67x

ASIA

Yadana

Yadana (Myanmar)Ban-I Tong (Thai border)31.24xx

REST OF WORLD

BTC

Baku (Azerbaijan)Ceyhan (Turkey, Mediterranean)5.00x

SCP

Baku (Azerbaijan)Georgia/Turkey Border10.00x

Dolphin (International transport and network)

Ras Laffan (Qatar)U.A.E.24.50            x  

WGT K13-Den Helder

K13ADen Helder4.66x

WGT K13-Extension

MarkhamK13 (via K4/K5)23.00x

United Kingdom

Alwyn Liquid Export Line

Alwyn NorthCormorant100.00xx

Bruce Liquid Export Line

BruceForties (Unity)43.25x

Central Area Transmission System (CATS)

Cats Riser PlatformTeeside0.57x

Central Graben Liquid Export Line (LEP)

Elgin-FranklinETAP15.89x

Frigg System : UK line

Alwyn North, Bruce and othersSt.Fergus (Scotland)100.00xx

Ninian Pipeline System

NinianSullom Voe16.00x

Shearwater Elgin Area Line (SEAL)

Elgin-Franklin, ShearwaterBacton25.73x

SEAL to Interconnector Link (SILK)

BactonInterconnector54.66xx

AFRICA

Gabon

Mandji Pipes

Mandji fieldsCap Lopez Terminal100.00(a)xx

Rabi Pipes

Rabi fieldsCap Lopez Terminal100.00(a)xx

AMERICAS

Argentina

Gas Andes

Neuquen Basin (Argentina)Santiago (Chile)56.50xx

TGN

Network (Northern Argentina)15.40x

TGM

TGNUruguyana (Brazil)32.68x

Bolivia

Transierra

Yacuiba (Bolivia)Rio Grande (Bolivia)11.00x

Brazil

TBG

Bolivia-Brazil borderPorto Alegre via São Paulo9.67x

Colombia

Ocensa

CusianaCovenas Terminal5.20x

Oleoducto de Alta Magdalena

TenayVasconia0.93x

Oleoducto de Colombia

VasconiaCovenas9.55x

ASIA

Yadana

Yadana (Myanmar)Ban-I Tong (Thai border)31.24xx

REST OF WORLD

BTC

Baku (Azerbaijan)Ceyhan (Turkey, Mediterranean)5.00x

SCP

Baku (Azerbaijan)Georgia/Turkey Border10.00x

Dolphin (International transport and network)

Ras Laffan (Qatar)U.A.E.24.50x

 

(a)(a)

Interest of Total Gabon. The Group has a financial interest of 58.28% in Total Gabon.

Gas & Power

The Gas & Power division is primarily focused on the optimization of the Group’s gas resources. The division is active in the transport, trading and marketing of natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and electricity, LNG re-gasification and natural gas storage. It is also engaged in shipping and trading of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), power generation from gas-fired power plants or renewable energies, and coal production, trading and marketing.

The Gas & Power division is also developing new energies that emit fewer greenhouse gases to complement hydrocarbons so as to meet the increasing global demand for energy. For this purpose, the Group has two main focuses:a financial interest of 58.28% in Total Gabon.

 

the upstream/downstream integration of the solar photovoltaic channel (achieved through the acquisition of a 60% stake in SunPower in 2011);

the thermochemical and biochemical conversion of feedstock into fuels or chemicals.

In these fields,
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL pursues and strengthens R&D in solar energy, conversion processing of biomass, gas and coal, energy storage, carbon capture and storage and gas technologies.

In parallel, the Group is closely monitoring nuclear power generation and its outlook.

Liquefied natural gasS.A.

31


Item 4 - Business Overview

Gas & Power

A pioneer in the LNG industry, TOTAL today ranks second worldwide among international oil companies(1) and has sound and diversified positions both in the upstream and downstream portions of the LNG chain. LNG development is key to the Group’s strategy, with TOTAL strengthening positions in most major production zones and markets.

Through its stakes in liquefaction plants located in Indonesia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Nigeria, Norway and, since 2009, Yemen, TOTAL markets LNG in all worldwide markets. In 2011, TOTAL sold 13.2 Mt of LNG, an increase of 7.3% compared to 2010 LNG sales (12.3 Mt) and of 48.3% compared to 2009 sales (8.9 Mt). The start-up of the Angola LNG plant in 2012, together with the Group’s liquefaction projects in Australia, Nigeria and Russia, are expected to allow for growth to continue in the coming years.

The Gas & Power division is responsible for LNG operations downstream from liquefaction plants.(2) It is in

charge of LNG marketing to third parties on behalf of the Exploration & Production division, building up the Group’s LNG portfolio for its trading, marketing and transport operations as well as re-gasification terminals.

InNigeria, TOTAL holds a 15% interest in the Nigeria LNG plant (NLNG). The Group signed an LNG purchase agreement, initially intended for deliveries to the United States and Europe, for an initial 0.23 Mt/y over a 23-year period starting in 2006, to which an additional 0.94 Mt/y was added when the sixth train came on stream in December 2007.

TOTAL also holds a 17% stake in the Brass LNG project, which calls for the construction of two liquefaction trains, each with a capacity of 5 Mt/y. In conjunction with this acquisition, TOTAL signed a preliminary agreement with Brass LNG Ltd setting forth the principal terms of an LNG purchase agreement for approximately one-sixth of the plant’s capacity over a 20-year period. This contract is subject to the final investment decision for the project by Brass LNG.

InNorway, as part of the Snøvhit project, in which the Group holds an 18.4% stake, TOTAL signed in 2004 a purchase agreement for 0.78 Mt/y of LNG over a 15-year period primarily intended for North America and Europe. Deliveries started in 2007.

InQatar, TOTAL signed purchase agreements in 2006 for 5.2 Mt/y of LNG from train 5 (TOTAL, 16.7%) of Qatargas 2 over a 25-year period. This LNG is expected to be marketed mainly in France, the United Kingdom and North America. LNG production from this train started in September 2009.

InYemen, TOTAL signed an agreement with Yemen LNG Ltd (TOTAL, 39.62%) in 2005 to purchase 2 Mt/y of LNG over a 20-year period, starting in 2009, which is initially intended for delivery in the United States and Europe. LNG production from Yemen LNG’s first and second trains started in October 2009 and April 2010, respectively.

Since 2009, part of the volume purchased by the Group pursuant to its long-term contracts related to the LNG projects mentioned above has been diverted to higher-value markets in Asia.

InAngola, TOTAL is involved in the construction of the Angola LNG liquefaction plant (TOTAL, 13.6%), which includes a 5.2 Mt/y train expected to start up in 2012. As

 

 

(1)Based on publicly available information; upstream and downstream LNG portfolios.

Gas & Power’s primary objective is to contribute to the growth of the Group by ensuring sales outlets for its current and future natural gas reserves and production.

In order to optimize these gas resources, particularly liquefied natural gas (LNG), Gas & Power’s activities include the trading and marketing of natural gas, liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and electricity as well as shipping. Gas & Power also has stakes in infrastructure companies (re-gasification terminals, natural gas transport and storage, power plants) necessary to implement its strategy.

In addtion, Gas & Power manages a coal business line, handling everything from production to marketing.

Liquefied natural gas

A pioneer in the LNG industry, TOTAL today is one of the world’s leading players(1) in the sector and has sound and diversified positions both in the upstream and downstream portions of the LNG chain. LNG development is key to the Group’s strategy, with TOTAL strengthening its positions in most major production zones and markets.

Through its stakes in liquefaction plants(2) located in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Nigeria, Norway, Yemen and Angola and its gas supply agreement with the Bontang LNG plant in Indonesia, TOTAL markets LNG in all worldwide markets. The share of LNG production sold by TOTAL in 2013 reached 12.3 Mt, an increase of over 7% compared to 2012 LNG sales (11.4 Mt). This increase was due in particular to the improved performance of the Yemen LNG plant in 2013. The Group’s forthcoming liquefaction projects, in particular in Australia and Russia, are aimed at increasing TOTAL’s share of LNG sold over the coming years.

Gas & Power is responsible for LNG operations downstream from liquefaction plants. It is in charge of marketing LNG on behalf of Exploration & Production and developing the Group’s LNG downstream portfolio for its trading, marketing and transport operations as well as re-gasification terminals.

Long-term Group LNG purchases

TOTAL acquires long-term LNG volumes most frequently from liquefaction plants in which the Group holds a stake. These volumes support expansion of the Group’s worldwide LNG portfolio.

InNigeria, as part of the Nigeria LNG project in which the Group has a 15% interest, TOTAL signed an LNG purchase agreement, initially intended for deliveries to the United States and Europe, for 0.23 Mt/y over a 23-year period starting in 2006, to which an additional 0.94 Mt/y was added when the sixth train came on stream in 2007.

TOTAL also holds a 17% stake in the Brass LNG project involving the ongoing study of a gas liquefaction plant with plans to construct two LNG trains, each with a capacity of 5 Mt/y. In 2006, TOTAL signed a preliminary agreement with Brass LNG Ltd setting forth the principal terms of an LNG purchase agreement for approximately one-sixth of the plant’s capacity over a 20-year period. This purchase agreement is subject to the final investment decision for the project.

InNorway, as part of the Snøhvit project, in which the Group holds an 18.4% stake, TOTAL signed in 2004 a purchase agreement for 0.78 Mt/y of LNG over a 15-year period primarily intended for North America and Europe. LNG deliveries started in 2007.

InQatar, TOTAL signed purchase agreements in 2006 for 5.2 Mt/y of LNG from train 5 (16.7%) of Qatargas 2 over a 25-year period. This LNG is marketed mainly in France, the United Kingdom and North America. LNG deliveries started in 2009.

InYemen, TOTAL signed an agreement with Yemen LNG Ltd (39.62%) in 2005 to purchase 2 Mt/y of LNG over a 20-year period, initially intended for delivery to the United States and Europe. LNG deliveries started in 2009.

Since 2009, part of the volume purchased by the Group pursuant to its long-term contracts related to the LNG projects mentioned above has been diverted to markets in Asia.

The new LNG sources described below are expected to support growth of the Group’s LNG portfolio.

InAustralia, TOTAL increased its stake in the Ichthys LNG project in early 2013 from 24% to 30%. Launched in early 2012, this project calls for the construction of two LNG trains, each with a capacity of 4.2 Mt/y. In addition, TOTAL signed in 2011 an LNG purchase agreement amounting to 0.9 Mt/y over a 15-year period. Deliveries are expected to start in 2017.

InRussia, TOTAL owns a 20% stake in Yamal LNG, which is overseeing a project to develop the South Tambey gas and condensates field and build a gas liquefaction plant with three trains supporting an LNG production of 16.5 Mt/y. The final investment decision was made in December 2013. Concurrently, TOTAL signed LNG purchase agreements amounting to 4 Mt/y over a 24-year period.

In theUnited States, TOTAL entered into an agreement in 2012 with the South Korean national natural gas company Kogas for the purchase of 0.7 Mt/y of LNG over a 20-year period from train 3 of the Sabine Pass gas terminal (Louisiana). Deliveries are expected to start in 2017. In parallel to this, TOTAL also entered into an agreement with Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC for the purchase of 2 Mt/y of LNG over a 20-year period from train 5 of the Sabine Pass terminal. LNG deliveries will begin on the date on which train 5 is commissioned, which is scheduled for 2018. This agreement is conditional on, among other things, export and construction permits being obtained by Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC (which owns and operates the terminal) for the construction of train 5 and the final investment decision for the project.

Long-term Group LNG sales

TOTAL has signed agreements for the sale of LNG from the Group’s global LNG portfolio:

InChina, TOTAL signed an LNG sales agreement with China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC). Under this agreement, which became effective in 2010, TOTAL supplies up to 1 Mt/y of LNG to CNOOC over a 15-year period.

InSouth Korea, TOTAL signed an LNG sales agreement in 2011 with Kogas. Under this agreement, TOTAL will deliver up to 2 Mt/y of LNG to Kogas between 2014 and 2031.

(1)

Company data, based on upstream and downstream LNG portfolios in 2013.

(2)

(2)

The Exploration & Production division is in charge of the Group's natural gas liquefaction and production operations.

part of this project, TOTAL signed in 2007 a re-gasified gas purchase agreement for 13.6% of the quantities produced over a 20-year period.

InAustralia, TOTAL holds a 24% stake in the Ichthys LNG project, which calls for the construction of two LNG trains, each with a capacity of 4.2 Mt/y. In conjunction with this acquisition, TOTAL signed an LNG purchase agreement for 0.9 Mt/y over a 15-year period. The final investment decision of the partners of the Ichthys LNG project was made in January 2012.

InChina, TOTAL signed in 2008 an LNG sale agreement with China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC). This agreement, starting in 2010 for a 15-year period, provides for the supply by TOTAL of up to 1 Mt/y of LNG to CNOOC. The gas supplied comes from the Group’s global LNG portfolio.

InSouth Korea, TOTAL signed an LNG sale agreement in 2011 with Kogas. Under this agreement, TOTAL will deliver up to 2 Mt/y of LNG to Kogas between 2014 and 2031. This gas will come from the Group’s global LNG portfolio.

With regard to LNG transport operations, since 2004 TOTAL has been the direct long-term charterer of the Arctic Lady, a 145,000 m3 LNG tanker that ships TOTAL’s share of production from the Snøvhit liquefaction plant in Norway. In November 2011, TOTAL signed a second long-term contract for the chartering of a 165,000 m3 LNG tanker, the Maersk Meridian, in order to strengthen its transport capacities with regards again to its lifting commitments in Norway.

The Group also holds a 30% stake in Gaztransport & Technigaz (GTT), which focuses mainly on the design and engineering of membrane cryogenic tanks for LNG tankers. At year-end 2011, out of a worldwide tonnage estimated at 386 LNG tankers(1), 258 active LNG tankers were equipped with membrane tanks built under GTT licenses.

Trading

In 2011, TOTAL continued to pursue its strategy of developing its operations downstream from natural gas liquefaction and production operations.

32TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

LNG production. The aim of this strategy is to optimize access for the Group’s current and future production to traditional markets (with long-term contracts) and to markets open to international competition (with short-term contracts and spot sales). In the context of deregulated markets, which allow customers to more freely access suppliers, in turn leading to new marketing arrangementsshipping

With regard to LNG transport operations, TOTAL has been the direct long-term charterer since 2004 of the Arctic Lady, a 145,000 m3 LNG vessel that ships TOTAL’s share of production from the Snøhvit liquefaction plant in Norway. In 2011, TOTAL signed a second long-term contract for the chartering of a 165,000 m3 LNG vessel, the Meridian Spirit (former Maersk Meridian), in order to strengthen its transport capacities with regard to its lifting commitments in Norway.

The Group is also beginning to develop a fleet. TOTAL signed a long-term charter agreement in April 2013 in this regard with SK Shipping and Marubeni for two 182,000 m3 vessels. The vessels will serve in fulfilling the purchase agreements of Total Gas & Power, including commitments relating to the Ichthys LNG project in Australia and the Sabine Pass project in the United States. These tankers, scheduled for delivery in 2017, will be among the largest to navigate the Panama Canal following its anticipated enlargement in 2015.

As of December 31, 2013, the Group held a 30% stake in Gaztransport & Technigaz (GTT), which focuses mainly on the design and engineering of membrane cryogenic tanks for LNG tankers. At year-end 2013, out of a worldwide tonnage estimated at 369 LNG vessels(1), 262 active LNG vessels were equipped with membrane tanks built under GTT licenses. TOTAL sold a share of its stake in GTT through the initial public offering (IPO) of GTT’s shares on Euronext Paris at the end of February 2014. Excluding the over-allotment option, TOTAL’s residual stake in GTT is 11.5%.

Trading

TOTAL continued in 2013 to pursue its strategy of developing operations downstream from natural gas and LNG production. The aim of this strategy is to optimize access for the Group’s current and future production to traditional markets (with long-term contracts) and to markets open to international competition (with short-term contracts and spot sales). In the context of deregulated markets, which allow customers to more freely access suppliers, in turn leading to marketing arrangements that are more flexible than traditional long-term contracts, TOTAL is developing trading, marketing and logistics businesses to offer its natural gas and LNG production directly to customers.

In parallel, the Group has operations in electricity trading and LPG as well as coal marketing. Furthermore, TOTAL began to market the petcoke production of the Port Arthur refinery (United States) in 2011.

Gas & Power’s trading teams are located in London, Houston, Geneva and Singapore and conduct most of their business through the Group’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Total Gas & Power, Total Gas & Power North America and Total Gas & Power Asia.

In parallel, the Group has operations in electricity trading and LPG as well as coal marketing.

Furthermore, in 2011 TOTAL began to market the petcoke production of the Port Arthur refinery (United States) on the international market.

The Gas & Power division’s trading teams are located in London, Houston, Geneva and Singapore and conduct most of their business through the Group’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Total Gas & Power and Total Gas & Power North America.

Gas and electricity

TOTAL has gas and electricity trading operations in Europe and North America with a view to selling the Group’s production and supplying its marketing subsidiaries.

InEurope, TOTAL marketed 1,500 Bcf (42.5 Bm3) of natural gas in 2011, compared to 1,278 Bcf (36.2 Bm3) in 2010 and 1,286 Bcf (36.5 Bm3) in 2009, including approximately 12% coming from the Group’s production. In addition, TOTAL marketed 24.2 TWh of electricity in 2011, compared to 27.1 TWh in 2010 and 35 TWh in 2009, which came mainly from external resources.

InNorth America, TOTAL marketed 1,694 Bcf (48 Bm3) of natural gas in 2011, compared to 1,798 Bcf (51 Bm3) in 2010 and 1,586 Bcf (45 Bm3) in 2009, supplied by its own production or external resources.

TOTAL has gas and electricity trading operations in Europe and North America with a view to selling the Group’s production and supplying its gas marketing subsidiaries in addition to supporting other Group activities.

InEurope, TOTAL marketed 1,194 Bcf (33.8 Bm3) of natural gas in 2013, including approximately 13.8% coming from the Group’s production, compared to 1,488 Bcf (42.1 Bm3) in 2012 and 1,500 Bcf (42.5 Bm3) in 2011. In addition, TOTAL marketed, mainly from external resources, 53.0 TWh of electricity in 2013 compared to 53.3 TWh in 2012 and 24.2 TWh in 2011.

InNorth America, TOTAL marketed from its own production or external resources 938 Bcf (26.6 Bm3) of natural gas in 2013, compared to 1,256 Bcf (36 Bm3) in 2012 and 1,694 Bcf (48 Bm3) in 2011.

LNG

TOTAL has LNG trading operations through spot sales and fixed-term contracts as described in “— Liquefied natural gas” above. Since 2009, new purchase agreements (Qatargas 2, Yemen LNG) and new sale agreements (China, India, Thailand, South Korea and Japan) have substantially developed the Group’s LNG marketing operations, particularly in Asia’s most buoyant markets. This spot and fixed-term LNG portfolio allows TOTAL to supply gas to its main customers worldwide, while retaining a sufficient degree of flexibility to react to market opportunities.

In 2011, TOTAL purchased 99 contractual cargos and 10 spot cargos from Qatar, Yemen, Nigeria, Norway, Russia and Egypt, compared to 94 and 12, respectively, in 2010 and 23 and 12, respectively, in 2009.

TOTAL has LNG trading operations through spot sales and fixed-term contracts as described in“— Liquefied natural gas”, above. Since 2009, new purchase agreements from the Qatargas 2 and Yemen LNG projects and new sale agreements in China, India, Japan and South Korea have substantially developed the Group’s LNG marketing operations, particularly in Asia’s most buoyant markets. This spot and fixed-term LNG portfolio allows TOTAL to supply gas to its main customers worldwide, while retaining a sufficient degree of flexibility to react to market opportunities.

In 2013, TOTAL purchased 89 contractual cargoes from Qatar, Yemen, Nigeria and Norway and 9 spot cargoes from France, Trinidad & Tobago and Nigeria, compared to respectively 87 and 8 in 2012 and 99 and 10 in 2011.

 

(1)
Gaztransport & Technigaz data.

LPG

In 2011, TOTAL traded and sold approximately 5.7 Mt of LPG (butane and propane) worldwide, compared to 4.5 Mt in 2010 and 4.4 Mt in 2009. Approximately 28% of these quantities came from fields or refineries operated by the Group. LPG trading involved the use of 7 time-charters, representing 188 voyages in 2011, and approximately 142

TOTAL traded and sold approximately 5.6 Mt of LPG (butane and propane) worldwide in 2013, compared to 6 Mt in 2012 and 5.7 Mt in 2011. Approximately 23% of these quantities came from fields or refineries operated by the Group. LPG trading involved the use of 11 time-charters, representing 233 voyages in 2013, and approximately 65 spot charters.

Coal

In 2011, TOTAL marketed 7.5 Mt of coal in the international market, compared to 7.3 Mt in 2010 and 2009. Approximately 70% of this coal comes from South Africa. More than three-quarters

TOTAL marketed 8.5 Mt of coal in the international market in 2013 and 2012, compared to 7.5 Mt in 2011. More than 80% of this coal came from South Africa. Approximately 60% of the volume was sold in Asia, where coal is used primarily to generate electricity. The remaining volume was sold in Asia, where coal is used primarily to generate electricity, with the remaining volume marketed in Europe.

Petcoke

TOTAL began to market the petcoke produced by the coker at the Port Arthur refinery in 2011. Approximately 1.2 Mt of petcoke was sold on the international market in 2013, compared to 1.1 Mt in 2012 and 0.6 Mt in 2011, to cement plants and electricity producers mainly in Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, China, Dominican Republic and other Latin American countries.

Marketing

To unlock value from the Group’s production, TOTAL is developing gas, electricity and coal marketing operations with end users in the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Germany. At the end of 2012, the Group enlarged its European marketing coverage by creating two marketing affiliates: Total Gas & Power Belgium (formerly known as Total Gas & Power North Europe) in Belgium, and Total Gas & Power Nederland B.V. in the Netherlands. These two subsidiaries started their operations in 2013.

In theUnited Kingdom, TOTAL markets gas and electricity to the industrial and commercial segments through its subsidiary Total Gas & Power Ltd. In 2013, volumes of gas sold amounted to 142 Bcf (4.0 Bm3), compared to 146 Bcf (4.2 Bm3) in 2012 and 162 Bcf (4.6 Bm3) in 2011. Sales of electricity totaled approximately 4.7 TWh in 2013, compared to 3.9 TWh in 2012 and 4.1 TWh in 2011.

(1)

In 2011,Gaztransport & Technigaz data.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL began to market the petcoke produced by the coker at the Port Arthur refinery. Approximately 0.6 Mt of petcoke was sold on the international market in 2011 to cement plants and electricity producers, mainly in Mexico, Brazil, Turkey and China.

MarketingS.A.

33


Item 4 - Business Overview

InFrance, TOTAL markets natural gas through its subsidiary Total Energie Gaz (TEGAZ), the overall sales of which were 141 Bcf (4.0 Bm3) in 2013, compared to 176 Bcf (5 Bm3) in 2012 and 208 Bcf (5.9 Bm3) in 2011. The Group also markets coal to its French customers through its subsidiary CDF Energie, with sales of approximately 0.81 Mt in 2013, compared to 0.97 Mt in 2012 and 1.2 Mt in 2011.

InSpain, TOTAL markets natural gas to the industrial and commercial segments through Cepsa Gas Comercializadora, in which it holds a 35% stake. Volumes of gas sold amounted to 101 Bcf (2.9 Bm3) in 2013 and 2012 compared to 85 Bcf (2.4 Bm3) in 2011.

InGermany, Total Energie Gas GmbH, marketing subsidiary of TOTAL created in 2010, marketed 76 Bcf (2.2 Bm3) of gas in 2013 to industrial and commercial customers, compared to 5 Bcf (0.15 Bm3) in 2012.

To unlock value from the Group’s production, TOTAL has gradually developed gas, electricity and coal marketing operations with end users in the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Germany.

In theUnited Kingdom, TOTAL sells gas and power to the industrial and commercial segments through its subsidiary Total Gas & Power Ltd. In 2011, volumes of gas sold amounted to 162 Bcf (4.6 Bm3), compared to 173 Bcf (4.9 Bm3) in 2010 and 130 Bcf (3.7 Bm3) in 2009. Sales of electricity totaled approximately 4.1 TWh in 2011, stable compared to 2010 and 2009.

InFrance, TOTAL markets natural gas through its subsidiary Total Energie Gaz (TEGAZ), the overall sales of which were 208 Bcf (5.9 Bm3) in 2011, compared to 226 Bcf (6.4 Bm3) in 2010 and 208 Bcf (5.9 Bm3) in 2009. The Group also markets coal to its French customers through its subsidiary CDF Energie, with sales of approximately 1.2 Mt in 2011, compared to 1.3 Mt in 2010 and 1 Mt in 2009.

InSpain, TOTAL markets natural gas to the industrial and commercial segments through Cepsa Gas Comercializadora, in which it holds a 35% stake. In 2011, volumes of gas sold amounted to 85 Bcf (2.4 Bm3), like in 2010 and compared to 70 Bcf (2 Bm3) in 2009.

InGermany, Total Energie created a marketing subsidiary in 2010, Total Energy Gas GmbH, which began

commercial operations in 2011, making its first sales to industrial customers and service companies.

The Group also holds stakes in the marketing companies that are associated with the Altamira and Hazira LNG re-gasification terminals located in Mexico and India, respectively.

Gas facilities

TOTAL develops and operates its natural gas transport networks, gas storage facilities (both liquid and gaseous) and LNG re-gasification terminals downstream from its natural gas and LNG production.

Natural gas transport, natural gas and LNG production.

Transport of natural gasLPG storage

InFrance, the Group’s transport operations located in the southwest of the country are grouped under Total Infrastructures Gaz France (TIGF), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Group. This subsidiary operates a regulated transport network of 5,000 km of gas pipelines. As part of the development of Franco-Spanish interconnections, TOTAL decided in 2011 to complete the Euskadour (France-Spain link) project with commissioning scheduled in 2015. This decision followed the decisions made in 2010 to invest in the Artère du Béarn and Girland gas pipeline projects (reinforcement of Artère de Guyenne), with commissioning scheduled in 2013.

Another highlight of 2011 was the implementation by TIGF of the Third Energy Package adopted by the European Union in July 2009, which entails splitting network operations from production and supply operations.

In France, TOTAL, through its 29.5% stake in Géométhane, owns natural gas storage in a salt cavern in Manosque with a capacity of 10.5 Bcf (0.3 Bm3). A 7 Bcf (0.2 Bm3) increase in storage capacity is scheduled to be commissioned in 2018.

TOTAL completed in July 2013 the sale of its subsidiary TIGF (Transport Infrastructures Gaz France) to the consortium consisting of Snam, EDF and GIC. TIGF has gas transport activities in southwestern France and operates a transport network of 5,000 km of gas pipeline.

InSouth America, TOTAL owns interests in several natural gas transport companies in Argentina, Chile and Brazil. These assets represent a total integrated network of approximately 9,500 km of pipelines serving the Argentinean, Chilean and Brazilian markets from gas-producing basins in Bolivia and Argentina, where the Group has natural gas reserves. These natural gas transport companies are challenged byface a difficult operational and financial environment in Argentina stemming from the absence of an increase in transport tariffs and the restrictions imposed on gas exports. The Group successfully negotiated in 2011 financial arrangements with some of its customers, which resulted in a significant improvement in earnings forHowever, GasAndes, a company in which TOTAL holds a 56.5% stake.

Storage of natural gas and LPG

InFrance, the Group’s storage operations located in the southwest are grouped under TIGF. This subsidiary operates two storage units under astake, successfully negotiated legal regimenew contracts with a usable capacity of 92 Bcf (2.6 Bm3).

Throughall its 35.5% stake in Géométhane, TOTAL owns natural gas storage in a salt cavern in Manosque with a capacity of 10.5 Bcf (0.3 Bm3). A proposed 7 Bcf (0.2 Bm3) increase in storage capacity was approved in February 2011, with commissioning scheduled in 2017-2018.customers.

InIndia, TOTAL holds a 50% stake in South Asian LPG Limited (SALPG), a company that operates an underground import and storage LPG terminal located on the east coast of the country. This cavern, the first of its kind in India, has a storage capacity of 60 kt. In 2011,2013, inbound vessels transported 850940 kt of LPG, compared to 779950 kt in 20102012 and 606850 kt in 2009.2011.

LNG re-gasification

TOTAL has entered into agreements to obtain long-term access to LNG re-gasification capacity on the three continents that are the largest consumers of natural gas: North America (the United(United States and Mexico), Europe (France and the United Kingdom), and Asia (India). This diversified presence allows the Group to access new liquefaction projects by becoming a long-term buyer of a portion of the LNG produced at these plants, thereby strengthening its LNG supply portfolio.

InFrance, TOTAL holds a 27.6%27.54% stake in Société du Terminal Méthanier de Fos Cavaou (STMFC)the company Fosmax and has, through its affiliatesubsidiary Total Gas & Power Ltd., are-gasification capacity of 2.2579 Bcf/y (2.25 Bm3/y.y). The terminal received 59fifty-three vessels in 2013, compared to fifty-six in 2012 and fifty-nine in 2011.

In 2011, TOTAL acquired a 9.99% stake in Dunkerque LNG (EDF 65%, operator) in order to develop a methane terminal project with a capacity of 13459 Bcf/y (13 Bm3/y.y). Trade agreements have also been signed whichthat allow TOTAL to reserve up to 2 Bm3/y of re-gasification capacity over a 20-year period. CommissioningThe project is underway and commissioning of the terminal is scheduled for the end of 2015.

In theUnited Kingdom, through its equity interest in the Qatargas 2 project, TOTAL holds an 8.35% stake in the South Hook LNG re-gasification terminal with a total capacity of 742 Bcf/y (21 Bm3/y) and an equivalent right of use to the terminal. Phase 2 ofIn 2013, the terminal was commissionedre-gasified fifty-two cargoes, compared to sixty-eight in April 2010, which increased the terminal’s total capacity to 742 Bcf/y (21 Bm3/y). The terminal operates at2012 and nearly 80% of its capacity andone hundred in 2011 re-gasified nearly 100 cargoes from Qatar.

InCroatia, TOTAL is involved in the study of an LNG re-gasification terminal on Krk Island, on the northern Adriatic coast.2011.

InMexico, TOTAL sold in 2011 its entire stake in the Altamirare-gasification terminal. However, TOTAL terminal, but it retained

its a 25% reservation of the terminal’s capacityi.e., 59 (59 Bcf/y (1.7or 1.7 Bm3/y) through its 25% stake in Gas del Litoral.

In theUnited States, TOTAL has reserved a re-gasification capacity of approximately 353 Bcf/y (10 Bm3/y) at the Sabine Pass terminal (Louisiana) for a 20-year period ending in 2029. In 2012, the Sabine Pass terminal received the authorization to export LNG from four liquefaction trains, which involves converting there-gasification plants into liquefaction plants. As a result, TOTAL negotiated financial compensation with Cheniere, the terminal’s operator, in relation to the commissioning of the successive liquefaction trains.

InIndia, TOTAL holds a 26% stake in the Hazira terminal, which has awhere the natural gas re-gasification capacity of 177was increased in 2013 to 244 Bcf/y (5(6.9 Bm3/y). The terminal, located on the west coast of India in the Gujarat state, is a merchant terminal with operations that cover both LNG re-gasification and gas marketing. After a year of sluggish activity in 2010,Due to the terminal’s full capacities are under contract for 2011 and 2012. The Indian market’s strong prospects for growth, prospects have led to a decisionpotential expansion project is under study to increase the terminal’s capacity to 230343 Bcf/y (6.5(9.7 Bm3/y) starting in 2013.by 2018.

Electricity generation

In a context of increasing global demand for electricity, TOTAL has developed expertise in the power generation sector, especially through cogeneration and combined cyclecombined-cycle power plant projects.

The Group is also involved in power generation projects from renewable sources and is closely monitoring nuclear power generation and its outlook.

Electricity from conventional energy sources

InAbu Dhabi, the Taweelah A1 power plant, combines electricity generation and water desalination. Itwhich is owned by Gulf Total Tractebel Power Cy in which TOTAL holds a 20% stake.(20%), combines electricity generation and water desalination. The Taweelah A1 power plant, in operation since 2003, currently has a net power generation capacity of 1,600 MW and a water desalination capacity of 385,000 m3 per day. The plant’s production is sold to Abu Dhabi Water and Electricity Company (ADWEC) as part of a long-term agreement.

InNigeria, TOTAL and its partner, the state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), own interests in two gas-fired power plant projects that are part of the government’s objectives to develop power generation and increase the share of natural gas production for domestic use:

 

the Afam VI power plant, part of the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) joint venture in which TOTAL holds a 10% stake, is a 630 MW combined-cycle power plant that has been in operation since the end of 2010; and

The Afam VI project, part of the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) joint venture in which TOTAL holds a 10% stake, concerns the development of a 630 MW combined-cycle power plant. Commercial operations started in December 2010.

 

34TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013

The development of a new 417 MW combined-cycle power plant near the city of Obite (Niger Delta) in


Item 4 - Business Overview

  

the potential development of a new 417 MW combined-cycle power plant near the city of Obite (Niger Delta) in connection with the OML 58 gas project part of the joint venture between NNPC and TOTAL (40%, operator). A final investment decision is expected in the first half of 2012 and commissioning is scheduled in the first half of 2014 in open-cycle and in early 2015 in closed-cycle. The power plant will be connected to the existing power grid through a new 108 km high-voltage transmission line.

InThailand, TOTAL owns 28% of Eastern Power and Electric Company Ltd, which operates the combined-cycle gas power plant in Bang Bo withthat has a capacity of 350 MW and has been in operation since 2003. The plant’s production is sold to the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand under a long-term agreement.

Electricity from nuclear energy sources

InFrance, TOTAL partners with EDF and other players through its 8.33% interest in the second French EPR project in Penly, in the northwest of the country, for which studies are underway.

The Group is closely monitoring nuclear power generation and its outlook.

Electricity from renewable energy sources

In concentrated solar power, TOTAL, in partnership with Spanish company Abengoa Solar, won the call for tenders for the construction and 20-year operation of a 109 MW concentrated solar power plant in Abu Dhabi. The Shams project (TOTAL, 20%) is being carried out in partnership with Masdar through the Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company, which holds a 60% stake in the project. Construction work started in July 2010 and start-up is expected during the second semester of 2012. The plant’s production will be sold to ADWEC.

In wind power, TOTAL owns a 12 MW wind farm in Mardyck (near Dunkirk, France), which was commissioned in 2003.

With respect to marine energy, TOTAL holds a 26.6% share in Scotrenewables Marine Power, located in the Orkney Islands in Scotland. Tests are being conducted on a 250 kW prototype.

Solar energy

TOTAL is developing upstream operations through industrial production and downstream marketing activities in the photovoltaic sector based on crystalline silicon technology. The Group is also pursuing R&D in this field through several partnerships, as well as in the fields of thin films, transverse systems research and solar energy storage.

In 2011, TOTAL took a major step toward implementing its solar photovoltaic strategy, where the Group has been active since 1983, by acquiring a majority stake in the U.S. company SunPower.

Solar photovoltaic

SunPower

In June 2011, following a friendly takeover bid, TOTAL acquired 60% of SunPower, a U.S. company based in San Jose, California and listed on NASDAQ (NASDAQ: SPWR). TOTAL now appoints the majority of the members of SunPower’s board of directors. SunPower is an integrated player that designs, manufactures and supplies the highest-efficiency solar panels in the market. It is active throughout the solar chain, from cell production to the design and construction of turnkey large power plants.

Upstream, SunPower manufactures all of its cells in Asia (Philippines, Malaysia). In 2011, SunPower operated twelve cell manufacturing lines at its cell manufacturing plant in Melaka, Malaysia (SunPower, 50%), which has a capacity of 600 MWp/y. SunPower’s overall cell production capacity at the beginning of 2012 was 1,300 MWp/y.

Downstream, SunPower is present in most major geographic markets (United States, Europe, Australia and Asia), with operations ranging from residential roof tiles to large solar power plants.

A specific R&D agreement between TOTAL and SunPower has also been signed.

As of January 2012, TOTAL owns 66% of SunPower following the Tenesol transaction described below.

Tenesol

Tenesol is a French company that designs, manufactures, markets, installs and operates solar photovoltaic systems. In October 2011, TOTAL became the sole shareholder of Tenesol after having finalized the acquisition of its EDF partner’s shares (excluding overseas activities). Tenesol owns solar panel manufacturing plants (South Africa, France), which have a total capacity of nearly 200 MWp/y.

TOTAL and SunPower reached an agreement whereby, in 2012, Tenesol’s operations, along with the solar panel plant in Moselle, northeastern France (see “— Other assets” below), became part of SunPower.

Photovoltech

TOTAL holds a 50% interest in Photovoltech, a Belgian company specialized in manufacturing multicrystalline photovoltaic cells. In 2011, Photovoltech finalized the ramp-up of its third production line, raising the total production capacity of its plant in Tienen, Belgium to 155 MWp/y.

Other assets

In 2011, TOTAL began the construction of a solar panel production and assembly plant in the northeastern region of Moselle in France, which is expected to begin operations in 2012 with an overall capacity of 44 MWp/y.

In addition, Tenesol’s overseas activities remain 50-50 subsidiaries of TOTAL and EDF through a new company named Sunzil.

Finally, the Group is continuing its projects to display solar application solutions as part of decentralized rural electrification projects in a number of countries, including in South Africa via Kwazulu Energy Services Company (KES) in which TOTAL holds a 35% stake. New projects are being studied in Africa and Asia.

Solar photovoltaic market context in 2011

In 2011, the photovoltaic sector was forced to cope with a difficult environment marked by excess cell production capacity and modification or cancellation of subsidy programs. This transition period is expected to result in a consolidation of the sector followed by the emergence of a competitive industry. As a clean energy, solar power has a large potential and should eventually become an indispensible part of the energy mix.

New solar technologies

TOTAL has committed to developing innovative technologies to improve its portfolio of solar projects. The Group has major R&D programs through partnerships with major laboratories and international research institutes in France and abroad.

In the upstream solar chain, TOTAL holds a 30% stake in AE Polysilicon Corporation (AEP), a U.S. company based near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. AEP has developed a new continuous process to produce solar-grade granular polysilicon.

With respect to the production of crystalline silicon cells and panels, the Group is continuing its partnership with the Interuniversity MicroElectronics Center (IMEC) near the University of Leuven, Belgium, in an effort to increase the efficiency of solar cells.

Regarding thin-film technologies and silicon-based nano-materials, in 2009 the Group partnered with the Laboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces de l’Ecole Polytechnique (LPICM) and the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) to set up a joint research team in the Saclay area in France. TOTAL also entered into a research partnership with Toulouse-based Laboratoire d’analyse et d’architecture des

systèmes (LAAS) to develop associated electrical systems. The aim of these partnerships is to improve the efficiency of the photovoltaic chain in order to substantially lower costs in this sector.

In organic solar technologies, the Group acquired approximately 25% of the U.S. start-up Konarka in 2008. Since 2009, Konarka Technologies Inc has carried out research projects in cooperation with TOTAL to develop solar film on a large scale.

Regarding solar energy storage, TOTAL entered in 2009 into a research agreement with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States to develop a new stationary battery technology.

Biotechnologies — conversion of biomass

TOTAL is exploring a number of avenues for developing biomass depending on the resource used, the nature of the target markets (e.g., fuels, lubricants, petrochemicals, specialty chemicals) and the conversion processes.

The Group has chosen to target the two primary conversion processes: biological and thermochemical.

In June 2010, TOTAL entered into a strategic partnership with Amyris Inc., a U.S. start-up specializing in biotechnologies. The Group acquired a stake in Amyris’ share capital (21.28% as of February 24, 2012) and signed a collaboration framework agreement that includes research, development, production and marketing partnerships with the creation of an R&D team. Two programs have been approved in 2011 to develop a biojet fuel as well as a biodiesel. At the end of 2011, partners agreed to create a joint-venture to produce and commercialize advanced molecules intended for the fuels, lubricants and special fluids markets.

Amyris owns a cutting-edge industrial synthetic biological platform designed to create and optimize micro-organisms (yeasts, algae, bacteria) that can convert sugars into fuels and chemicals. Amyris owns research laboratories and a pilot unit in California as well as a pilot plant and a demonstration facility in Brazil. Industrial production of farnesene began in 2011 at three partner sites (in Brazil, the United States and Spain) representing a nominal annual capacity of 50,000 m³. A fourth production site is as well under construction and shall be completed in 2012.

In addition, the Group continues to develop a network of R&D partnerships, including with the Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI) Novogy (United States), the University of Wageningen (Holland) and the Toulouse White Biotechnology consortium (TWB) (France) in technology segments that are complementary with Amyris’ platform: deconstruction of lignocelluloses and new biosynthesis processes.

The Group is also assessing the potential of phototrophic processes and bio-engineering of microalgae. In December 2011, it entered into a partnership with Cellectis S.A. in exploratory research on molecules similar to petroleum products, from microalgae, for the energy and chemicals markets.

Carbochemistry

Carbon capture and storage

TOTAL is involved in a program to develop new carbon capture and storage technologies to reduce the environmental footprint of the Group’s industrial projects based on fossil energy.

In partnership with the French IFP Énergies Nouvelles (French Institute for Oil and Alternative Energies), TOTAL is involved in an R&D program related to chemical looping combustion, a new process to burn solid and gas feedstock that includes carbon capture at a very low energy cost. In 2010, this partnership resulted in the construction of a demonstration pilot at the Solaize site in France. A large-scale pilot is expected to be commissioned in 2013.

The Group is also involved in the EU-co-funded Carbolab project that intends to validate the carbon storage technology in coal seams and coalbed methane recovery.

DME

TOTAL is involved in the European “Bio-DME” project in Sweden, the goal of which is to validate a di-methyl ether

(DME) production chain through gasification of black liquor generated by a pulp mill. The pilot plant located in Pitea successfully came into production at the end of 2011. To date, three metric tons of bio-DME that meet the Group’s specifications for use as fuel have already been produced.

In addition, to support the commercial development of DME, TOTAL is involved with eight Japanese companies in a program intended to heighten consumers’ awareness of this new fuel in Japan. The 80 kt/y production plant (TOTAL, 10%), located in Niigata, started up in 2009.

Finally, via the International DME Association (IDA), TOTAL is participating in studies on the combustion of blends that include DME and in standardization efforts regarding the use of DME as fuel.

Coal production

For nearly thirty years, TOTAL, through its subsidiary Total Coal South Africa (TCSA), has produced and exported coal from South Africa primarily to Europe and Asia. In 2011, TOTAL2013, TCSA produced 3.84.3 Mt of coal.

With the start-up of production on the Dorstfontein East mine in 2011, the subsidiary Total Coal South Africa (TCSA)TCSA owns and operates five mines in South Africa. The GroupAfrica and continues to study other projects aimed at developing its mining resources.

The South African coal produced by TCSA or bought from third-parties’ mines is either marketed locally or exported through the port of Richard’s Bay, in which TOTALTCSA holds a 5.7%4.8% interest.

 

 

DROWNSTREAMEFINING & CHEMICALSSEGMENT

 

 

The 2011 Downstream segment comprised TOTAL’s Refining & MarketingChemicals segment constitutes a large industrial group that encompasses refining, petrochemicals, and specialty chemicals operations. This segment was created on January 1, 2012(1), following the reorganization of the Downstream and Chemical segments, also includes Trading & Shipping divisions.

In October 2011, the Group announced a proposed reorganization of its Downstream and Chemicals segments. The procedure for informing and consulting with employee representatives took place and the reorganization became effective on January 1, 2012.

This led to organizational changes, with the creation of:activities.

 

ARefining & Chemicalssegment, a large industrial center that encompasses

Refining & Chemicals includes the Group’s refining, petrochemicals and specialty chemicals businesses. The petrochemicals business includes base petrochemicals (olefins and aromatics) and polymer derivatives (polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene). The specialty chemicals business includes elastomer processing, adhesives and electroplating chemistry. The volume of its Refining & Chemicals activities places TOTAL among the top ten integrated chemical producers in the world(2).

fertilizers and specialty chemicals operations. This segment also includes oil trading and shipping activities.

Against the backdrop of rising worldwide demand for oil and petrochemicals driven by non-OECD countries, the strategy of Refining & Chemicals, in addition to the priority given to safety and environmental protection, involves:

 

A Supply & Marketing segment, which is dedicatedadapting production capacity to worldwide supplychanges in demand in Europe by concentrating investments on integrated platforms;

consolidating industrial means of production and marketing activitiesthe search for opportunities for growth in the United States; and

strengthening TOTAL’s positions in Asia and the Middle East, in particular to gain access to advantaged oil products field.and gas resources and to benefit from growth in the markets.

The Downstream activities described below, includingThis strategy is underpinned by an effort to differentiate through the datatechnology used and innovation found in its products and processes, and involves pursuing asset portfolio management to focus on core businesses.

Since 2012, Refining & Chemicals has launched a comprehensive program to improve operational efficiency and to generate synergies between its refining and petrochemicals activities. In particular, four industrial priorities were set for the Refining & Chemicals activities: safety, availability of facilities, cost controls and energy efficiency. These action plans, combined with the development projects on its major integrated platforms and the growth of Specialty chemicals, should improve the profitability of operations by making the most of Refining & Petrochemicals’ assets.

In June 2013, TOTAL completed the divestment of its Fertilizers activity (base chemicals) in Europe, mainly through the sale of its

shares in GPN S.A. (100%), France’s leading producer of nitrogen fertilizers, and in the Belgian company Rosier S.A. (56.86%)(3).

Refining & Petrochemicals

TOTAL’s refining capacity was 2,042 kb/d as of December 31, 2011, are presented based on the organization in effect up2013, compared to December 31, 2011.

Refining & Marketing

TOTAL’s worldwide refining capacity was 2,0882,048 kb/d at year end 2011, compared to 2,363year-end 2012 and 2,096 kb/d in 2010 and 2,594 kb/d in 2009.at year-end 2011. The Group’s worldwide refined products sales (including trading operations) in 20112013 were 3,6393,418 kb/d, compared to 3,7763,403 kb/d in 20102012 and 3,6163,639 kb/d in 2009.2011.

TOTAL has equity stakes in twenty-one refineries (including nine that it operates), located in Europe, the United States, the French West Indies, Africa, the Middle East and China.

TOTAL is amongRefining & Chemicals sector manages the largest refiners/marketersrefining operations located in Western Europe(1) (excluding the joint venture TotalErg in Italy), the United States, the Middle East and Asia, with a capacity of 1,953 kb/d at year-end 2013 (i.e., 96% of the leading marketer in AfricaGroup’s total capacity(2)(4)).

DirectlyThe petrochemicals businesses are located mainly in Europe, the United States, Qatar, South Korea and Saudi Arabia. Most of these sites are either adjacent or viaconnected by pipelines to Group refineries. As a result, TOTAL’s petrochemical operations are integrated within its holdings, TOTAL has a worldwide retail network of 14,819 service stations at year end 2011, compared to 17,490 in 2010 and 16,299 in 2009. Through its retail network, TOTAL provides fuels to more than 3 million customers every day. In addition, TOTAL produces a broad range of specialty products, such as lubricants, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), jet fuel, special fluids, bitumen, heavy fuel, marine fuel and petrochemical feedstock.refining operations.

The year 2013 saw the startup of the first production at the SATORP refinery in Saudi Arabia. Through this project, approved in 2009, the Group continuesholds a stake, alongside Saudi Aramco, in one of the most competitive refining & petrochemicals platforms in the world.

TOTAL also announced in 2013 a major investment program to modernize the platform in Antwerp, Belgium, and a project to adapt its business and improve positionsthe petrochemicals platform in a contextCarling, France, with the goal of growing demand worldwide, mainly in non-OECD countries,restoring competitiveness by focusing on three areas:2016.

adapting to mature markets in Europe;

developing its positions in growth markets (Africa, Asia and the Middle East); and

developing specialty products worldwide.

In July 2011, TOTAL closed the sale to IPIC of its 48.83% stake in CEPSA as part of a public takeover bid on the entire share capital of CEPSA. With respect to Refining & Marketingrefining operations, this sale concernsconcerned mainly four Spanish refineries (Huelva, Algeciras, Tenerife, Tarragona) and, some marketingwith respect to petrochemicals operations, aromatics and their derivatives.

(1)

As a result of the reorganization, certain information has been restated.

(2)

Based on publicly available information, production capacities at year-end 2012.

(3)

The divestment did not include TOTAL’s interest in Grande Paroisse S.A., through which TOTAL has retained all liabilities related to the former activities of Grande Paroisse, and in particular those related to the AZF site in Toulouse.

(4)

Earnings related to the refining assets in Africa, the French West Indies and the TotalErg joint venture are reported in the results of the Marketing & Services segment.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.35


Item 4 - Business Overview

Europe

TOTAL is the largest refiner in Spain and Portugal.

In October 2011, TOTAL sold its network of service stations and its fuel and heating oil marketing business in the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.

RefiningWestern Europe(1).

TOTAL has equity stakes in twenty refineries (including ten that it operates), located in Europe, the United States, the French West Indies, Africa and China.

In 2011, TOTAL continued its program of selective investments in Refining, which is focused on three areas: pursuing major ongoing projects (deep conversion at the Port Arthur refinery and construction of the Jubail refinery),

adapting the European refining system to structural market changes, and increasing safety and energy efficiency.

InWestern Europe, TOTAL’s refining capacity was 1,7921,736 kb/d in 2011,at year-end 2013, compared to 2,0491,742 kb/d in 2010at year-end 2012 and 2,2821,787 kb/d in 2009,at year-end 2011, accounting for 85% of the Group’s overall refining capacity. The decrease in 20112012 was due primarily to the saleshutdown of the Group’s stake in CEPSA.Rome refinery. The Group operates nineeight refineries in Western Europe (one in Antwerp, Belgium, five in France in Donges, Feyzin, Gonfreville, Grandpuits and La Mède, one in Immingham in the United Kingdom and one in Leuna, Germany) and owns stakes in the Schwedt refinery in Germany, the Zeeland refinery in the Netherlands and two refineriesthe Trecate refinery in Italy through its interest in TotalErg.

InFranceThe Group’s main petrochemical sites are located in Belgium, in Antwerp (steam crackers, aromatics, polyethylene) and Feluy (polyolefins, polystyrene), where it owns five refineries,and in France, in Carling (steam cracker, aromatics, polyethylene, polystyrene), Feyzin (steam cracker, aromatics), Gonfreville (steam crackers, aromatics, styrene, polyolefins, polystyrene) and Lavéra (steam cracker, aromatics, polypropylene). Europe accounts for 54% of the Group continuesGroup’s petrochemicals capacity,i.e., 10,899 kt at year-end 2013 compared to adapt its refining capacities11,803 kt at year-end 2012 and shift11,013 kt at year-end 2011. The decrease in 2013 was due essentially to the production emphasis to diesel,closure of one steam cracker in a context of structural decline in petroleum products demand in Europe and anAntwerp. The increase in gasoline surpluses.2012 was due mainly to the acquisition of 35% of Fina Antwerp Olefins.

Since autumn 2010, TOTAL

InFrance, the Group owns five refineries and continues to adapt its refining capacities by shifting the production emphasis to diesel and improving operational efficiency against the backdrop of a structural decline in the demand for petroleum products in Europe and an increase in gasoline surpluses.

The Group has been implementing its project to repurpose the Flanders site. The shutdown of the refining business will lead to gradually dismantling the units. The Group has commenced repurposing the site through the creation of a technical support center, a refining training school, an oil depot and business offices.

In addition, the industrial plan started in 2009 to adapt the Group’s refining base in France is ongoing. This plan is intended to reconfigure the Gonfreville refinery in Normandy, refinery and rescale certain corporate departments at the Paris headquarters. At the Normandy refinery, theFrance, since 2009. The project is intended to upgrade the refinery and shift the production emphasis to diesel. For this purpose, the investments will resultresulted in the eventual reduction ofreducing the annual distillation capacity to 12 Mt from 16 Mt, upsizing the distillate hydrocracker unit for heavy diesel cuts and improving energy efficiency by lowering carbon dioxide emissions. Most of the new configuration was rolled out at the beginning of 2013 after a major complete shutdown of the refinery. The new structurecomplete project is expected to become operational atbe finalized by mid-2014 with the endstartup of 2013.a new diesel desulfurization unit.

In summer 2010,parallel, the Group divested its minority interest (40%)project to modernize the Normandy platform’s petrochemical operations was completed in early 2012. This project improved the Société de la Raffinerie de Dunkerque (SRD), a company that specializes in bitumenenergy efficiency of the steam cracker and base oil production.the high-density polyethylene unit.

In theUnited Kingdom, the hydrodesulphurization (HDS) unit at the Lindsey refinery was commissioned in February 2011. The unit makes it possible to process up to 70% of high-sulphur crudes, compared to 10% previously, and increase low-sulphur diesel production. In 2010,petrochemicals, the Group announced that it

in September 2013 an investment plan for the Carling platform in Lorraine, France, to adapt its capacity and restore its competitiveness. The project provides for the development of new hydrocarbon resin and polymer production activities and the shutdown of the steam cracking activity in the second half of 2015.

 

(1)

Based on publicly available information, refining capacities and quantities sold.InBelgium, the Group announced in May 2013 the launch of a major project to modernize its Antwerp platform. This project consists of two parts:

(2)¡PFC Energy, based on quantities sold.

the construction of new conversion units in response to the shift in demand towards lighter oil products with a very low sulfur content; and

 ¡ 

would offerthe construction of a new unit to convert the gases recovered from the refining process into raw materials for sale itspetrochemical units.

The modernization plan also provides for the shutdown of two of the site’s oldest production units: one steam cracker in 2013, and a polyethylene production line by the end of 2014.

TOTAL built a new unit in Feluy that is starting up in 2014 in order to produce latest-generation expansible polystyrene for the fast-growing insulation market.

Moreover, in 2012, TOTAL acquired 35% of Fina Antwerp Olefins, Europe’s second largest base petrochemicals (monomers) production plant(2).

In theUnited Kingdom, the commissioning in 2011 of the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) unit at the Lindsey refinery allowed the refinery to increase its crude processing flexibility (up to 70% of high-sulfur crudes, compared to 10% previously) and its low-sulfur diesel production.

In 2013, TOTAL decided to shut down its 70 kt/year polystyrene production site at Stalybridge, while continuing its commercial activity for polymers in the United Kingdom.

InItaly, TotalErg (49%) holds a 24.45% stake in the United Kingdom. Due to the difficult market conditions and the lack of sufficiently attractive and competitive offers, the Group decidedTrecate refinery. The Rome refinery, which was wholly-owned by TotalErg, was turned into a depot in early 2012 to maintain the refinery within its refining network.2012.

 

North America

InGermanyThe Group’s main sites are located in Texas, in Port Arthur (refinery, steam cracker), an additional HDS unit designedBayport (polyethylene) and La Porte (polypropylene), and in Louisiana, in Carville (styrene, polystyrene).

In 2011, TOTAL completed a program to supply the German market with low-sulphur heating oil started up in autumn 2009 at the Leuna refinery.

InItaly, TotalErg (TOTAL, 49%) has operated the Rome refinery (100%) since October 2010 and holds a 25.9% stake in the Trecate refinery.

In theUnited States, TOTAL operatesupgrade the Port Arthur refinery in Texas, with a capacity of 174 kb/d. In 2008, TOTAL launched an upgrading program that included the construction of a desulphurizationdesulfurization unit, commissioned in July 2010 and a vacuum distillation unit, a deep-conversion unit (or coker) and other associated units, which were successfully commissioned in April 2011.units. This project enablesmodernization allows the refinery to process more heavy and high-sulphurhigh-sulfur crudes and to increase production of lighter products, in particular low-sulphurlow-sulfur distillates.

TOTAL and BASF purchased in 2011 Shell’s stakes in Sabina, a butane processing plant, which they transferred to BTP (40%), their joint subsidiary that owns the Port Arthur steam cracker. This new structure increases synergies between the refinery and the steam cracker, which are located on the same site in Port Arthur.

Furthermore, as a result of the investment made to adapt its furnaces, the BTP cracker has, since April 2013, been able to produce almost 40% of its ethylene from ethane and 40% from butane and propane, which allows it to benefit from favorable market conditions in the United States. The ongoing construction of a new ethane-burning furnace will increase the steam cracker’s production capacity by almost 15% in 2014.

Asia and the Middle East

TOTAL is continuing to expand in growth areas and is developing sites in countries with favorable access to raw materials.

InSaudi Arabia, TOTAL and Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) created athe joint venture in 2008, Saudi Aramco Total Refining and Petrochemical Company (SATORP), was created in 2008 by TOTAL (37.5%) and Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabian Oil Company, 62.5%) in order to build a 400 kb/d refinery in Jubail held byJubail. Saudi Aramco (62.5%) and TOTAL (37.5%). TOTAL and Saudi Aramco each planplans to retain a 37.5% interest, with the remaining 25%

(1)

Based on publicly available information, 2012 refining capacities and quantities sold.

(2)

Based on publicly available information, production capacities at year-end 2012.

36TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

expected to be listed on the Saudi stock exchange. The main contracts for the constructionMost of the refinerydifferent units of SATORP were signedgradually commissioned in mid-2009, concurrent with2013 and the start-upcommercial exports of work. Commissioningpetroleum products started in September 2013. All the refining and petrochemicals units should be operational by the end of first quarter 2014. Production is expected in 2013.to reach full capacity around mid-2014.

The heavy conversion processconfiguration of this refinery is designed for processing heavierheavy crudes produced nearbyin Saudi Arabia and selling fuels and lighterother light products that meet strict specifications and that are mainly intended for export. The refinery willis also be integrated with the petrochemical units.

InAfrica, the Group has minority stakes in five refineries in South Africa, Senegal, Côte d’Ivoire, Cameroonunits: a 700 kt/y paraxylene unit, a 200 kt/y propylene unit, and Gabon.

In theFrench West Indies, the Group has a 50% stake in the company Société Anonyme de la Raffinerie des Antilles (SARA), which owns a refinery in Martinique.140 kt/y benzene unit.

InChina, TOTAL hasholds a 22.4% stake in the WEPEC, a company that operates a refinery located in Dalian and that also produces polypropylene.

The Group is also active through its polystyrene plant in partnershipFoshan (Guangzhou region), the capacity of which doubled to 200 kt/y at the beginning of 2011. A new polystyrene compounds unit started up on this site in the first quarter of 2013. TOTAL began the construction of a new 200 kt/y polystyrene plant in Ningbo in the Shanghai region, with Sinochemproduction scheduled to start up in the second half of 2014.

InSouth Korea, TOTAL holds a 50% stake in Samsung Total Petrochemicals Co., Ltd., which operates the petrochemical site located in Daesan (condensate splitter, steam cracker, styrene, paraxylene, polyolefins). The joint venture completed in mid-2011 the first debottlenecking phase of the units at the Daesan site in order to bring them to full capacity. This first phase included increasing the capacity of the steam cracker to 1,000 kt/y and PetroChina.the polyolefin units to 1,150 kt/y. A second phase took place in September 2012 and involved increasing the capacity of the paraxylene unit to 700 kt/y.

In addition, to keep up with growth in the Asian markets, two major projects are under construction for planned start-up in 2014: a new 240 kt/y EVA(1) unit and a new aromatic unit with a capacity of 1.5 Mt/y of paraxylene and benzene, the raw material of which will be supplied by a new condensate splitter that will also produce kerosene (1.5 Mt/y) and diesel (1.0 Mt/y). As a result, the site’s paraxylene production capacity will be increased to 1.8 Mt/y. Together, these projects are expected to double the production capacity of the site between 2011 and 2015.

InQatar, the Group holds interests(2) in two ethane-based steam crackers (Qapco, RLOC) and four polyethylene lines (Qapco, Qatofin), including the linear low-density polyethylene plant with a capacity of 450 kt/y operated by Qatofin in Messaied and a new 300 kt/y low-density polyethylene line operated by Qapco, which started up in 2012.

TOTAL holds a 10% stake in the Ras Laffan condensate refinery, which has a capacity of 146 kb/d. Plans to double the refinery’s capacity were approved in April 2013 and are expected to be completed in 2016. The project also includes the construction of a new diesel hydrogenation unit scheduled to come on-stream in 2014.

Crude oil refining capacity

The table below sets forth TOTAL’s daily crude oil refining capacity(a)(3):

 

As of December 31, (kb/d)  2011   2010   2009 

Refineries operated by the Group

               

Normandy (France)

   199     199     338  

Provence (France)

   158     158     158  

Flanders (France)

             137  

Donges (France)

   230     230     230  

Feyzin (France)

   117     117     117  

Grandpuits (France)

   101     101     101  

Antwerp (Belgium)

   350     350     350  

Leuna (Germany)

   230     230     230  

Rome (Italy)(b)

             64  

Lindsey — Immingham (United Kingdom)

   221     221     221  

Vlissingen (Netherlands)(c)

   82     81     81  

Port Arthur, Texas (United States)

   174     174     174  

Subtotal

   1,862     1,861     2,201  

Other refineries in which the Group has equity stakes(d)

   226     502     393  

Total

   2,088     2,363     2,594  
As of December 31, (kb/d)  2013   2012   2011 

Nine refineries operated by Group companies

      

Normandy (100%)

   247     247     247  

Provence (100%)

   153     153     153  

Donges (100%)

   219     219     219  

Feyzin (100%)

   109     109     109  

Grandpuits (100%)

   101     101     101  

Antwerp (100%)

   338     338     338  

Leuna (100%)

   227     227     227  

Lindsey — Immingham (100%)

   207     207     207  

Port Arthur (100%)

   169     169     169  

Subtotal

   1,770     1,770     1,770  

Other refineries in which the Group has equity stakes(a)

   272     278     326  

Total

   2,042     2,048     2,096  

 

(a)For refineries not 100% owned by TOTAL, the capacity shown is TOTAL’s equity share of the site’s overall refining capacity.
(b)

TOTAL’s stake was 71.9% until September 30, 2010.

(c)TOTAL’s stake is 55%.
(d)share in the eleven refineries in which TOTAL has equity stakes ranging from 12%10% to 50%55% (one in ten refineries (fivethe Netherlands, in Africa, twoGermany, in China, in Qatar, in Italy one in Germany, oneand in Martinique and onefive in China)Africa). TOTAL divested its stakeRome refinery shutdown in 2012.The SATORP platform at Jubail in Saudi Arabia (TOTAL, 37.5%), that was in the Indeni refinery in Zambia in 2009. Since October 2010, the amounts include the Group’s shareprocess of starting up on December 31, 2013, was not taken into account in the Rome and Trecate refineries through its stakeabove table of capacities. In 2014, once entirely operational, TOTAL’s share of capacity in TotalErg. TOTAL divested its stake in CEPSA (four refineries) in 2011.the refinery will be 145 kb/d.

Refined products

The table below sets forth by product category TOTAL’s net share of refined quantities produced at the Group’s refineries(a):

 

(kb/d)  2011   2010   2009   2013   2012   2011 

Gasoline

   350     345     407     340     351     350  

Aviation fuel(b)

   158     168     186     146     153     158  

Diesel and heating oils

   804     775     851     739     734     804  

Heavy fuels

   179     233     245     133     160     179  

Other products

   335     359     399     322     338     335  

Total

   1,826     1,880     2,088     1,680     1,736     1,826  

 

(a)

For refineries not 100% owned by TOTAL, the production shown is TOTAL’s equity share of the site’s overall production.

(b)

Avgas, jet fuel and kerosene.

 

(1)

Ethylene and vinyl acetate copolymers.

(2)

TOTAL interests: Qapco (20%); Qatofin (49%); Ras Laffan Olefin Cracker (22.5%).

(3)

Capacity data based on refinery process unit stream-day capacities under normal operating conditions, less the impact of shutdown for regular repair and maintenance activities averaged over an extended period of time.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.37


Item 4 - Business Overview

Utilization rate

Utilization rate

The tables below set forth the utilization rate of the Group’s refineries:refineries(1):

 

  2011 2010 2009 

On crude and other feedstock(a)(b)

     2013 2012 2011 

France

   91  64  77   78  82  91

Rest of Europe (excluding CEPSA and TotalERG)

   77  85  88

Rest of Europe(c)

   87  88  78

Americas

   81  83  77   100  99  81

Asia

   67  81  80

Asia and Middle East

   75  67  67

Africa

   80  76  77   78  75  80

CEPSA and TotalERG(c)

   83  94  93

Average

   83  77  83   84%   86%   83% 

(a) Including equity share of refineries in which the Group has a stake.

(b) Crude + crackers’ feedstock/capacity and distillation at the beginning of the year.

(c) For CEPSA in 2011: calculation of the utilization rate based on production and capacity prorated on the first seven months of the year.

       

        

        

  2011 2010 2009 

On crude(a)(b)

   

Average

   78  73  78

 

(a)

Including equity share of refineries in which the Group has a stake.

(b)

Crude/Crude + crackers’ feedstock/capacity and distillation at the beginning of the year.

Marketing
(c)

Including CEPSA (for first seven months of 2011) and TotalErg.

TOTAL is one of the leading marketers in Western Europe.(1) The Group is also the largest marketer in Africa, with a market share of nearly 14%.(2)

TOTAL markets a wide range of specialty products produced from its refineries and other facilities. TOTAL is among the leading companies in the specialty products market, in particular for lubricants, LPG, jet fuel, special fluids, bitumen, heavy fuels and marine fuels, with products marketed in approximately 150 countries(3).

Europe

In Europe, TOTAL has a network of more than 9,400 service stations in France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Germany, as well as in Italy through its share in TotalErg (49%).

TOTAL also operates a network of 615 AS24-branded service stations dedicated to commercial transporters.

TOTAL is among the leaders in Europe for fuel-payment cards, with approximately 3.5 million cards issued in twenty-seven European countries.

InWestern Europe, TOTAL continued to optimize its Marketing business in 2011.

InFrance, the network benefits from a wide number of service stations and a diverse selection of products (such as the Bonjour convenience stores and car washes). Nearly 2,000 TOTAL-branded service stations and 270 Elf-branded service stations are operated in France. TOTAL also markets fuels at nearly 1,800 Elan-branded service stations, generally located in rural areas.

In October 2011, TOTAL launched Total access, a new service station concept combining low prices with TOTAL brand fuel and service quality. The Total access network will be made up of around 600 service stations in France, including the 270 Elf-branded service stations that will be rebranded as Total access. The project is expected to be fully implemented by 2014.

At the end of 2011, TOTAL finished implementing the project to adapt oil logistics operations announced in January 2010. The Pontet and Saint Julien oil depots were closed in October 2010. Operatorship of the Hauconcourt depot was transferred to a third party in October 2010. In July 2011, operatorship of the Le Mans oil depot was transferred to a third party and the Ouistreham oil depot was divested. In January 2010, TOTAL also divested half of its stake (reduced from 50% to 25%) in Dépôts Pétroliers de La Corse and transferred operatorship. Dyneff and TOTAL’s logistics assets in Port La Nouvelle were pooled in December 2011 under the umbrella of new company Entrepôt Pétrolier de Port La Nouvelle, which was created in July 2011.

In 2012, TOTAL is expected to complete the adaptation of oil logistics operations by implementing the project announced in September 2011. In the first half of 2012, the Brive and Chambéry depots are expected to be closed, and operatorship of the Lorient and Lyon depots is expected to be transferred to third parties. At the same time, TOTAL is expected to divest 24% of its current 50% stake in Entrepôt Pétrolier de Lyon. The Honfleur depot, which belongs to wholly-owned TOTAL subsidiary BTT, is expected to be closed in the second half of 2012.

On crude(a)(b)  2013  2012  2011 

Average

   80%   82%   78% 

 

(1)(a)

Based on publicly available information, quantities sold.Including equity share of refineries in which the Group has a stake.

(2)(b)

Market share forCrude/distillation capacity at the markets wherebeginning of the Group operates, based on publicly available information, quantities sold.year.

(3)Including via national distributors.

 

InItaly, as partPetrochemicals: breakdown of the optimization of the Group’s downstream portfolio in Europe, TotalErg (TOTAL, 49%) was created in autumn 2010 through the merger of Total Italia and ERG Petroli. TotalErg has become the third largest operator in the Italian market with a network market share of nearly 13%(1) and more than 3,350 service stations.TOTAL’s main production capacities

 

In theUnited Kingdom, TOTAL announced in June 2011 that it had signed an agreement to sell its network of service stations and its fuel and heating oil marketing business in the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. This sale was closed in October 2011. TOTAL continues to operate in specialty products in the United Kingdom, particularly lubricants and aviation fuel.

InNorthern, Central and Eastern Europe, the Group is developing its positions primarily in the specialty products market. In 2011, TOTAL continued to expand its direct presence in the growing markets of Eastern Europe, in particular for lubricants. The Group intends to accelerate the growth of its specialty products business in Russia, Ukraine and the Balkans through the development of its direct presence in these markets since 2008.

AS24, which is active in twenty-six European countries, continued to expand its network, exceeding the milestone of 600 service stations and opening new outlets in two new countries, Ukraine (2011) and Georgia (early 2012). The AS24 network is expected to continue to grow, mainly through expansion in the Mediterranean Basin and Russia, by strengthening its position in strategic countries and through its toll payment card service, which covers more than seventeen countries.

Africa & the Middle East

TOTAL is the leading marketer of petroleum products on the African continent, with a market share of 14%.(2) Following the acquisition of marketing and logistics assets in Kenya and Uganda in 2009, the Group runs more than 3,500 service stations in more than forty countries and operates major networks in South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya and Morocco. As part of the optimization of its portfolio, the Group divested its subsidiary in Benin in late 2010.

TOTAL also has a large presence in Turkey and Lebanon, and is developing a network of large service stations in Jordan.

In the Middle East, the Group is active mainly in the specialty products market and is pursuing its growth strategy in the region, notably through the production and marketing of lubricants.

Asia-Pacific

At year-end 2011, TOTAL was present in nearly twenty countries in the Asia-Pacific region, primarily in the specialty products market. The Group is developing its position as a fuel marketer in the region, in particular in China. TOTAL operates service stations in Pakistan, the Philippines, Cambodia, Indonesia, and is a significant player in the Pacific Islands.

InChina, the Group operated nearly 160 service stations at year-end 2011 through two TOTAL/Sinochem joint ventures.

InIndia, TOTAL is expected to open in early 2012 its first lubricants, bitumen, special fluids and additives technical support center outside Europe.

InVietnam, TOTAL continues to strengthen its position in the specialty products market. The Group has become one of the leaders in the Vietnamese lubricants market due to the acquisitions of assets at year-end 2009.

Americas

InLatin America and the Caribbean, TOTAL is active in nearly twenty countries, primarily in the specialty products market. In the Caribbean, the Group holds a significant position in the fuel distribution business, which was strengthened by the acquisition in 2008 of marketing and logistics assets in Puerto Rico, Jamaica and the Virgin Islands.

InNorth America, TOTAL markets specialty products, mainly lubricants, and is continuing to grow with the acquisition at year-end 2009 of lubricant assets in the province of Quebec in Canada.

Sales of refined products

The table below sets forth TOTAL’s sales of refined products by region:

(kb/d)  2011   2010   2009 

France

   740     725     808  

Europe, excluding France(a)

   1,108     1,204     1,245  

United States

   47     65     118  

Africa

   304     292     281  

Rest of the World

   225     209     189  

Total excluding Trading

   2,424     2,495     2,641  

Trading

   1,215     1,281     975  

Total including Trading

   3,639     3,776     3,616  
    2013   2012   2011 
As of December 31, (in thousands of tons)  Europe   North
America
   Asia and
Middle East(a)
   Worldwide   Worldwide   Worldwide 

Olefins(b)

   4,939     1,295     1,420     7,654     8,039     7,097  

Aromatics(c)

   2,893     1,512     1,230     5,635     5,795     5,730  

Polyethylene

   1,200     445     644     2,289     2,239     2,094  

Polypropylene

   1,345     1,200     350     2,895     2,875     2,835  

Polystyrene

   522     700     308     1,530     1,595     1,555  

Other(d)

             63     63     358     358  

Total

   10,899     5,152     4,014     20,065     20,900     19,668  

 

(a)

Including TOTAL’s share in CEPSA (up to end of July 2011) and, as from October 1, 2010, in TotalErg.

(1)PFC Energy, Unione Petrolifera, based on quantities sold.
(2)Market share in the countries where the Group operates, based on 2011 publicly available information, quantities sold.

Service stations

The table below sets forth the number of service stations of the Group:

As of December 31,  2011   2010   2009 

France(a)

   4,046     4,272     4,606  

Europe, excluding France

   5,375     7,790     6,219  

of which TotalErg

   3,355     3,221       

of which CEPSA

        1,737     1,734  

Africa

   3,464     3,570     3,647  

Rest of the World

   1,934     1,858     1,827  

Total

   14,819     17,490     16,299  

(a)Total-, Elf- and Elan-branded service stations.

Biofuels

TOTAL is active in the biodiesel and biogasoline sectors. In 2011, TOTAL produced and blended 494 kt of ethanol(1) in gasoline at its European refineries(2) and several oil depots (compared to 464 kt in 2010 and 510 kt in 2009) and 1,859 kt of VOME(3) in diesel at its European refineries(4) and several oil depots (compared to 1,737 kt in 2010 and 1,655 kt in 2009).

TOTAL, in partnership with the leading companies in this area, is developing second generation biofuels derived from biomass. TOTAL is also working with leading worldwide public and private scientific partners on

biochemical and thermochemical biomass conversion.

The Group is thus participating in French, European and international bioenergy development programs. As part of this, TOTAL is involved in two demonstration projects:

BioTfueL, which aims to develop technology to convert biomass into biodiesel; and

Futurol, an R&D project for cellulosic bioethanol, which intends to develop and promote on an industrial scale a production process for bioethanol by fermentation of non-food lignocellulosic biomass.

Hydrogen and electric mobility

TOTAL is continuing its hydrogen fueling demonstrations as part of the Clean Energy Partnership in Germany. A new prototype station is being built in the center of Berlin and is scheduled to open in February 2012. TOTAL is also involved in the “H2 Mobility” study underway in Germany, which aims to identify the business model that would enable the creation of an infrastructure in light of the potential marketing of fuel cell vehicles between 2015 and 2020.

The number of prototype electric vehicle fueling stations (fast charge) is increasing. TOTAL now has twelve charging stations in Belgium. In France, two stations have been completed in the Paris area as part of the SAVE project, and six are being built in the Netherlands.

Trading & Shipping

The Trading & Shipping division:

sells and markets the Group’s crude oil production;

provides a supply of crude oil for the Group’s refineries;

imports and exports the appropriate petroleum products for the Group’s refineries to be able to adjust their production to the needs of local markets;

charters appropriate ships for these activities; and

undertakes trading on various derivatives markets.

The Trading & Shipping division’s main focus is serving the Group. In addition, the division’s expertise allows it to extend its scope of activities beyond its primary focus.

Trading & Shipping’s worldwide activities are conducted through various wholly-owned subsidiaries, including TOTSA Total Oil Trading S.A., Total International Ltd, Socap International Ltd, Atlantic Trading & Marketing Inc., Total Trading Asia Pte, Total Trading and Marketing Canada L.P., Total Trading Atlantique S.A. and Chartering & Shipping Services S.A.

(1)Including ethanol from ETBE (Ethyl-Tertio-Buthyl-Ether) and biomethanol from MTBE (Methyl-Tertio-Butyl-Ether).
(2)CEPSA’s refineries and oil depots are not included in 2011, 2010 and 2009 figures.
(3)VOME: Vegetable-Oil-Methyl-Ester. Including HVO (Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil).
(4)Including Total Erg’s Rome and Trecate refineries in Italy. CEPSA’s refineries and oil depots are not included in 2011, 2010 and 2009 figures.

(1)Contango is a term used to describe an energy market in which the anticipated value of the spot price in the future is higher than the current spot price. The reverse situation is described as backwardation.

Trading

TOTAL is one of the world’s largest traders of crude oil and refined products on the basis of volumes traded. The table below sets forth selected information with respect to the worldwide sales and sources of supply of crude oil and sales of refined products for the Group’s Trading division for each of the last three years.

Trading of physical volumes of crude oil and refined products amounted to 4.4 Mb/d in 2011.

Trading division’s supply and sales of crude oil and sales of refined products(a)

(kb/d)  2011   2010   2009 

Group’s worldwide liquids production

   1,226     1,340     1,381  

Purchased by the Trading division from the Group’s Exploration & Production division

   960     1,044     1,054  

Purchased by the Trading division from external suppliers

   1,833     2,084     2,351  

Total of Trading division’s supply

   2,793     3,128     3,405  

Sales by Trading division to Group Refining & Marketing division

   1,524     1,575     1,752  

Sales by Trading division to external customers

   1,269     1,553     1,653  

Total of Trading division’s sales

   2,793     3,128     3,405  

Total sales of refined products

   1,632     1,641     1,323  

(a)Including condensates.

The Trading division operates extensively on physical and derivatives markets, both organized and over the counter. In connection with its trading activities, TOTAL, like most other oil companies, uses derivative energy instruments (futures, forwards, swaps, options) to adjust its exposure to fluctuations in the price of crude oil and refined products. These transactions are entered into with various counterparties.

For additional information concerning Trading & Shipping’s derivatives, see Notes 30 (Financial instruments related to

commodity contracts) and 31 (Market risks) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

All of TOTAL’s trading activities are subject to strict internal controls and trading limits.

In 2011, the oil market tightened; as a result, the oil price rise accelerated and the structure of crude oil prices flipped from contango to backwardation(1).

        2011   2010   2009   min 2011  max 2011 

Brent ICE — 1st Line(a)

   ($/b  110.91     80.34     62.73     93.33     (Jan. 07  126.65     (Apr. 08

Brent ICE — 12th Line(b)

   ($/b  108.12     84.61     70.43     94.20     (Jan. 07  121.74     (Apr. 29

Contango/Backwardation time structure (12th-1st)

   ($/b  -2.79     4.27     7.70     -9.55     (Oct. 14  2.65     (Feb. 07

Gasoil ICE — 1st Line(a)

   ($/t  933.30     673.88     522.20     767.75     (Jan. 01  1,053.00     (Apr. 08

(a)1st line: Average quotation on ICE Futures for first nearby month delivery.
(b)12th Line: Average quotation on ICE Futures for twelfth nearby month delivery.

The oil markets had ended 2010 significantly up, driven by the very strong upturn in demand for oil (+2.8 Mb/d). The outbreak of war in Libya in February 2011 quickly deprived the oil market of 1.6 Mb/d of crude supply. On the international markets, the shutdown of Libyan crude production was aggravated by production losses in Nigeria (through attacks on oil infrastructure and diversion of the oil), Angola (with technical problems on several fields), Yemen (through attacks on oil infrastructure) and Syria (due to the embargo). The resulting crude oil deficit was offset mainly by Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, which all increased their production

considerably, thereby reducing the surplus available production capacity. Production in Libya gradually started up again from September 2011 and reached around 0.9 Mb/d at the end of 2011.

Overall in 2011, OPEC crude oil production was estimated to be slightly down compared to 2010 (-0.1 Mb/d), as was non-OPEC crude production (-0.2 Mb/d). The production of other liquids in 2011 (LPG, LNG, biofuels) rose (+0.5 Mb/d).

With regard to demand, the significant price rise and generally weaker economic growth than in 2010 slowed

growth in oil demand, which fell from +2.8 Mb/d in 2010 to +0.5 Mb/d in 2011.

In this environment, crude oil prices, which started rising at the beginning of the year, increased from an average of approximately $96/b (ICE Brent 1st Line) in January 2011 to $123/b in April 2011 while the market adjusted to the loss of Libyan supply. Prices fell slightly in the second half of 2011, particularly under the effect of the IEA’s emergency stock release (60 Mb offered, 35 Mb delivered) and the partial resumption of Libyan production. Crude oil prices remained high however, reaching an annual average in 2011 of $110.91/b.

As a result of the backwardation in the price structure on the crude oil market for almost the entire year, 2011 was also marked by a sharp fall in OECD oil industry inventories through October 2011 (year-on-year, crude -70 Mb and products -46 Mb), which diminished in the last 2 months of the year with the rise in Libyan crude production (December 2011 year-on-year, crude -26 Mb and

products -36 Mb).

2011 also saw a widening of the price differential between WTI crude (confined to the central United States) and Brent crude (delivered in the North Sea and accessible internationally). While Brent was experiencing upward pressure due to the balance of crude oil on the international market, WTI was under downward pressure from a continuous rise in local production and exports from Canada, the combination of which exceeded local refining capacity requirements and potential exports outside the region. The price of WTI thus rose less quickly than Brent, increasing the gap to almost -$28/b in mid-October (at the height of the upward pressure on Brent).

The gap was more than halved at the end of the year, particularly with the announcement of the planned reversal of the Seaway pipeline, which should ease the pressure from the surplus of crude weighing down markets in the central United States.

Shipping

TOTAL’s Shipping division arranges the transportation of crude oil and refined products necessary to develop the Group’s activities. These needs are met through transactions on the spot market and the development of a balanced time charter policy. It has a rigorous safety policy that is due mainly to the strict selection of the vessels the division charters. Like a certain number of other oil companies and shipowners, the Group uses freight rate derivative contracts in its shipping activity to adjust its exposure to freight rate fluctuations.

In 2011, TOTAL’s Shipping division chartered approximately 3,000 voyages to transport approximately 110 Mt of crude oil and refined products. As of December 31, 2011, it employed a fleet of fifty vessels chartered under long-term or medium-term agreements (including eight LPG carriers), of which none is single-hulled. The fleet has an average age of approximately five years.

Freight rates average of three representative routes for crude transportation

        2011   2010   2009   min 2011  max 2011 

VLCC Ras Tanura Chiba — BITR(a)

   ($/t  11.99     13.41     10.43     9.32     (Oct. 10  18.54     (Feb. 15

Suezmax Bonny Philadelphia-BITR

   ($/t  13.86     14.50     12.75     10.23     (Jan. 20  19.85     (Mar. 22

Aframax Sullom Voe Wilhemshaven-BITR

   ($/t  6.51     6.39     5.20     5.04     (Jan. 17  9.46     (Mar. 4

(a)VLCC: Very Large Crude Carrier. BITR: Baltic International Tanker Routes.

2011 was a particularly eventful and difficult period for oil shipping activities.

During the first half of 2011, events in Japan and North Africa had a strong impact on crude oil imports. Requirements in Japan fell suddenly and very markedly, but were quickly restored and returned to almost pre-crisis levels by the end of 2011. In the end, the impact on demand for shipping was relatively limited. In the Mediterranean, the shutdown of Libyan production resulted in the rebalancing of demand for long-haul VLCC shipments: imports, particularly to Europe, were offset by supply from further away, thus increasing the demand for transportation.

On a more global level, the market was buoyed by demand from China, which is still growing strongly, and to a lesser extent the United States.

Despite this generally favorable demand structure, the freight market operated at overcapacity for most of 2011. Very few ships were decommissioned and 2011 saw a steady stream of new vessels being delivered as a result of the many orders placed by shipowners in 2007 and 2008.

This situation severely damaged the fundamentals of the freight market for crude oil transport. Following the extremely cold weather at the beginning of 2011, which sustained rates for a time, there was a collapse in the

second quarter that left the market at a historic low. With regard to the product tanker market, the situation remains

poor worldwide, with transatlantic traffic to the United States particularly slow.

CHEMICALS

The 2011 Chemicals segment included the Base Chemicals (petrochemicals and fertilizers businesses) and Specialty Chemicals (elastomer processing, adhesives and electroplating chemistry businesses) divisions. TOTAL is one of the world’s largest integrated chemical producers.(1)

In October 2011, the Group announced a proposed reorganization of its Downstream and Chemicals segments. The procedure for informing and consulting with employee representatives took place and the reorganization became effective on January 1, 2012.

This led to organizational changes, with the creation of:

A Refining & Chemicalssegment, a large industrial center that encompasses refining, petrochemicals, fertilizers and specialty chemicals operations. This

segment also includes oil trading and shipping activities.

A Supply & Marketing segment, which is dedicated to worldwide supply and marketing activities in the oil products field.

The Chemicals activities described below, including the data as of December 31, 2011, are presented based on the organization in effect up to December 31, 2011.

Base Chemicals

The Base Chemicals division includes TOTAL’s petrochemicals and fertilizers activities.

In 2011, the Base Chemicals division’s sales were12.7 billion, compared to10.7 billion in 2010 and8.7 billion in 2009.

Petrochemicals

BREAKDOWN OF TOTAL’S MAIN PRODUCTION CAPACITIES

(in thousands of tons)  2011   2010   2009 
  Europe   North America   Asia and Middle
East
(a)
   Worldwide   Worldwide   Worldwide 

Olefins(b)

   4,695     1,195     1,460     7,350     7,190     6,895  

Aromatics

   2,500     940     770     4,210     4,195     4,195  

Polyethylene

   1,180     440     520     2,140     2,140     2,040  

Polypropylene

   1,315     1,175     345     2,835     2,780     2,780  

Styrenics(c)

   1,150     1,260     730     3,140     2,950     3,090  

(a)Including minority interests in Qatar and 50% of Samsung-TotalSamsung Total Petrochemicals Co., Ltd. capacities. The SATORP platform at Jubail in Saudi Arabia (TOTAL, 37.5%), that was in the process of starting up on December 31, 2013, was not taken into account in the above table of capacities. In 2014, once entirely operational, TOTAL’s share of capacity in the plant will be 390 kt (75 kt of olefins and 315 kt of aromatics).

(b)

Ethylene, propylene and butadiene.

(c)

StyreneIncluding Monomer Styrene.

(d)

Mainly Monoethylene Glycol (MEG) and polystyrene.Cyclohexane.

 

Development of new avenues for the production of fuels and polymers

The petrochemicals business includes base petrochemicals (olefins and aromatics) and their polymer derivatives (polyolefins and styrenics)In addition to optimizing existing processes, TOTAL is exploring new ways for valorizing carbon resources, conventional or otherwise (natural gas, coal, biomass, waste).

InEurope A number of innovative projects are being examined that entail defining access to the resource (nature, location, supply method, transport), the main petrochemical sites are located in Belgium, in Antwerp (steam crackers, polyethylene)nature of the molecules and Feluy (polypropylene, polystyrene)target markets (fuels, lubricants, petrochemicals, specialty chemicals), and the most appropriate, efficient and environmentally-friendly conversion processes.

Natural gas to liquids

TOTAL continues to develop its know-how in France,the conversion of natural gas to fuel. For large-scale projects (more than 10 kboe/d), TOTAL is consolidating its know-how in Carling (steam cracker, polyethylene, polystyrene), Feyzin (steam cracker), Gonfreville (steam crackers, styrene, polyolefins, polystyrene)the most efficient conversion processes and Lavéra (steam cracker, polypropylene).is contributing to the development of innovative solutions, in particular by developing new Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. TOTAL is also conducting research into small-scale concepts, such as torched gas solutions.

In

Coal to polymers

TOTAL has developed know-how in theUnited States, the main petrochemical sites are located in Carville, Louisiana (styrene, polystyrene), and in various processes used to convert coal into higher value products by gasification.

Texas,These efforts allow a better understanding of the technological issues specific to each process, such as Fischer-Tropsch, methanol, di-methyl ether (DME) and methane, particularly in Bayport (polyethylene), La Porte (polypropylene)terms of energy optimization, water consumption and Port Arthur (steam cracker, butadiene).carbon capture.

InAsia, TOTAL owns,is studying a coal to olefin (CTO) conversion project in partnership with Samsung,the China Power Investment utility company that would be located in Inner Mongolia (China). This 800 kt/y olefins project would use the innovative Methanol-to-Olefins process (MTO/OCP), which has been successfully tested in 2013 on a 50% interestdemonstration unit at Feluy, Belgium. Following the approval from the Chinese authorities in November 2013, a detailed study has been launched.

In parallel, TOTAL is pursuing a program to develop new carbon capture and storage technologies in order to reduce the environmental footprint of the Group’s industrial projects based on fossil energy. In partnership with the IFP Énergies Nouvelles (French Institute for Oil and Alternative Energies), TOTAL is involved in an R&D program related to chemical looping combustion, an innovative process to burn solid and gas feedstock that includes carbon capture at a very low energy cost. In 2010, this partnership resulted in the petrochemicalconstruction of a pilot at the Solaize site located in Daesan, South Korea (steam cracker, styrene, paraxylene, polyolefins). The Group is also active through its polystyrene plants located in Singapore and Foshan (China).

InQatar, the Group holds interests in two steam crackers and several polyethylene lines.

Most of these sites are either adjacent to or connected by pipelines to Group refineries. As a result, most of TOTAL’s petrochemical operations are integrated within refining operations.France.

 

 

 

(1)

Based on publicly available information, consolidated sales.

TOTAL continues to strengthen its leadership positions in the industry by focusing on the following three main strategic areas:

InEurope, TOTAL is improving the competitiveness of its long-established sites notably through cost management, better energy efficiency at its facilities and increased flexibility in the choice of feedstock.

In an increasingly competitive environment, the Group launched two reorganization plans mainly for the Carling (eastern France) and Gonfreville (northwestern France) sites:

The first plan, launchedRas Laffan refinery contribution (Middle East) included in 2006, called for the closure of one of the steam crackers and the styrene plant at Carling and the construction of a new world-class(1) styrene plant at Gonfreville to replace the plant closed in late 2008. The reorganization plan was completed in the first quarter of 2009.utilization rates from 2013.

 

38TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

 

The second plan, launched in 2009, is a consolidation projectBiomass to improve the sites’ competitiveness. This project includes a plan to upgrade the Group’s most efficient units by investing approximately230 million over three years to increase energy efficiency and competitiveness of the steam cracker and the high-density polyethylene unit in Gonfreville, and to consolidate polystyrene production at the Carling facility. It also includes the shutdown of structurally loss-making units, effective from the end of 2009: two low-density polyethylene lines, one in Carling and one in Gonfreville, and a polystyrene line in Gonfreville. This reorganization plan also impacted the support services at both sites and the central services at Total Petrochemicals France.polymers

Following its sole customer’s terminationTOTAL is involved in the development of processes dedicated or related to the supply contractconversion of biomass to polymers. The main area of focus is the development of a polylactic acid (PLA) production technology through Futerro, a joint venture with Galactic, a lactic acid producer, as well as developing a technology for dehydration of bio-alcohols into olefins (monomers for the secondary butyl alcohol produced at the Notre-Dame-de-Gravenchon facilitymanufacture of large conventional polymers), in Normandy, this dedicated facility had to be closed in the second half of 2010.

At the end of 2011, TOTAL signed an agreement relating to the acquisition of 35% of ExxonMobil’s stake in Fina Antwerp Olefins, Europe’s second largest base petrochemicals (monomers) production plant. Following approval by the relevant authorities, the transaction was finalized in February 2012 and TOTAL became the sole shareholder in Fina Antwerp Olefins on March 1, 2012. The acquisition will open new

opportunities to strengthen the competitiveness of the assets and to pursue integration which is one of the foundations of Total’s strategy.

In theUnited States, TOTAL and BASF purchased in 2011 Shell’s stake in Sabina, one of the largest butadiene production plants in the world. TOTAL and BASF are now the only two shareholders in Sabina,collaboration with stakes of 40% and 60%, respectively. This new structure will allow for increased synergies with the TOTAL refinery and the jointly-owned steam cracker (TOTAL 40%, BASF 60%) located on the same site in Port Arthur, Texas.

TOTAL is continuing to expand in growth areas.

InAsia, the Samsung-Total Petrochemicals Co. Ltd joint venture (TOTAL, 50%) completed in mid-2011 the first debottlenecking phase of the units at the Daesan site in South Korea, with the aim of bringing them to full capacity. This first phase included increasing the capacity of the steam cracker to 1 Mt/y and the polyolefin units to 1,150 kt/y.

The second phase is expected to take place in September 2012 and involves increasing the capacity of the paraxylene unit to 700 kt/y.

In addition, to keep up with growth on the Asian markets, two major investments have been approved for planned start-up in 2014: a new 240 kt/y EVA(2) unit and a new aromatic unit with a capacity of 1.5 Mt/y of paraxylene and benzene, the feedstock of which will be supplied by a condensate splitter that will also produce jet fuel and diesel. As a result, the site’s paraxylene production capacity will be increased to 1.8 Mt/y.

In theMiddle East, the 700 kt/y paraxylene unit at the Jubail refinery in Saudi Arabia is under construction. This world-class unit is mainly intended to supply the Asian market. Start-up is scheduled for 2013.

TOTAL is developing sites in countries with favorable access to raw materials.

InQatar, through its interest in Qatofin and Qapco, TOTAL holds a 49% interest in a world-class linear low-density polyethylene plant with a capacity of 450 kt/y in Mesaieed. This unit, operated by Qatofin,

started up in 2009. The Group also holds a 22% interest in an ethane-based steam cracker in Ras Laffan designed for processing 1.3 Mt/y of ethylene. The steam cracker started up in March 2010. In

IFPen/Axens.

 

(1)Biomass to fuels

TOTAL is a member of the BioTFuel consortium, the objective of which is to develop a chain for converting lignocellulose into fungible, sulfur-free liquid products through gasification and synthesis using the Fischer-Tropsch process. To benefit from economies of scale, it is envisaged to convert lignocellulosic feedstock into a blend with fossil resources. This development involves an initial pilot demonstration phase.

In 2013, the Group incorporated:

o

Facilities ranking among the first quartile for production capacities based on publicly available information.in gasoline, 549 kt of ethanol(1) at its European refineries and several oil depots(2), compared to 531 kt in 2012 and 494 kt in 2011(3); and

(2)o

Ethylene Vinyl Acetate.in diesel, 1,951 kt of VOME(4) at its European refineries and several oil depots(5), compared to 1,927 kt in 2012 and 1,859 kt in 2011(3).

addition, construction of a 300 kt/y low-density polyethylene line has started at Qapco, in which TOTAL holds a 20% interest, with start-up scheduled for the second quarter of 2012.

InChina, TOTAL and China Power Investment signed in November 2010 an agreement to study a project to build a coal-to-olefins plant and a polyolefins plant. TOTAL will bring to this partnership its expertise in the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) and olefin cracking process (OCP) technologies tested extensively at its plant in Feluy, Belgium.Specialty chemicals

Base petrochemicals

Base petrochemicals includes olefins and aromatics (monomers) produced by the steam cracking of petroleum cuts, naphtha and LPG, or of gas as well as propylene and aromatics manufactured in the Group’s refineries. The economic environment for these activities is strongly influenced by the balance between supply and demand and changes in feedstock prices, especially naphtha.

The market was buoyant in the first half of 2011, followed by a significant slowing in volumes and falling margins, mainly in Europe and the United States, in the second half. Over 2011 as a whole, TOTAL’s production volumes remained stable.

TOTAL is expanding its positions in Asia and the Middle East with the start-up of the Ras Laffan steam cracker in 2010 in Qatar and continued investments to increase capacities in South Korea. In Europe and the United States, TOTAL is improving energy efficiency at its sites, strengthening synergies with refining and increasing the flexibility of the steam cracker feedstock.

Polyolefins

TOTAL’s strategy for polyolefins (polyethylene, polypropylene) is based on lowering the breakeven point of its plants in Europe and the United States and continuing to differentiate its range of products, while meeting new market requirements for sustainable development. The Group is also continuing to expand its activities in growth areas, mainly through its stakes in joint ventures in South Korea and Qatar.

Polyethylene: Polyethylene is a plastic resulting from the polymerization of ethylene produced by the Group’s steam crackers. It is primarily intended for the packaging, automotive, food, cable and pipe markets. Margins are strongly influenced by the level of demand and the price of ethylene. In Europe, margins are impacted by competition from expanding production in the Middle East, which benefits from favorable access to ethane, the raw material used in ethylene production.

2011 was marked by a slowdown in growth in demand in all geographical areas and by falling margins, more particularly in the second half. Europe was most affected by this deterioration in the market environment.

The Group’s sales volumes increased by 2% in 2011.

Polypropylene: Polypropylene is a plastic resulting from the polymerization of propylene produced by the Group’s steam crackers and refineries. It is primarily intended for the automotive, packaging, carpet, household appliances, fibers and hygiene markets. Margins are mainly influenced by the level of demand and the availability and price of propylene.

As with polyethylene, 2011 saw a slowdown in growth in worldwide demand and falling margins in the second half of the year.

TOTAL’s sales volumes decreased by 2.5% compared to 2010.

Styrenics

This business activity includes the production of styrene and polystyrene. Most of the styrene manufactured by the Group is used to produce polystyrene, a plastic principally used in food packaging, insulation, refrigeration, domestic appliances and electronic devices. Margins are strongly influenced by the level of polystyrene demand and the price of benzene, which is styrene’s principal raw material.

The worldwide styrenics market increased by approximately 2% in 2011, driven by Asia, while the markets in Europe and the United States remained practically stable. Margins were low on the highly competitive European and Asian markets, but remained high in the United States.

TOTAL’s polystyrene sales volumes increased by 4% in 2011.

The Group continues to expand its styrenics business. In Feluy, Belgium, TOTAL is building a new-generation expandable polystyrene manufacturing plant. Start-up is scheduled for early 2013. The expandable polystyrene is intended for the insulation market, which is experiencing strong growth. In China, TOTAL doubled the capacity of the Foshan compact polystyrene plant to 200 kt/y in early 2011.

Fertilizers

Through its French subsidiary GPN, TOTAL manufactures and markets nitrogen fertilizers made from natural gas. Margins are strongly influenced by the price of natural gas.

In 2010 and 2011, GPN’s production was affected by a number of manufacturing incidents that resulted in long shutdowns for maintenance of the Grandpuits and Rouen ammonia plants in France and reduced production at the downstream plants (nitric acid, urea and ammonium nitrate). These incidents adversely affected the results of GPN, which could not take advantage of favorable global market conditions.

GPN’s plans were strengthened through two major investments: the construction of a nitric acid plant in Rouen, which started up in the second half of 2009, and a urea plant in Grandpuits, the start-up of which was ongoing in March 2012. This additional urea production will enable GPN to position itself in the growing markets of products that contribute to reducing nitrogen oxide emissions(1): DeNOx® for industrial applications and Adblue® for transportation applications. An Adblue unit has been maintained at Oissel waiting for the start-up of the Grandpuits plant.

In France, three obsolete nitric acid units in Rouen and Mazingarbe were closed in 2009 and 2010.

GPN’s mines and quarries business at the Mazingarbe site was divested in January 2011. Sales for the divested lines of business were30 million in 2010.

In November 2011, the Group initiated the process of divesting its stake (50%) in Pec-Rhin. Having exercised its pre-emptive right on its partner’s 50%, GPN signed an agreement for the complete divestment of Pec-Rhin. Following approval by the relevant authorities, the disposal was finalized in January 2012. These actions are intended to improve the competitiveness of GPN by regrouping its operations at two sites that have production capacity greater than the European average.

Specialty Chemicals

TOTAL’s Specialty Chemicals division includesspecialty chemicals businesses include elastomer processing (Hutchinson), adhesives (Bostik) and electroplating chemistry (Atotech). It servesThey serve the automotive, construction, electronics, aerospace and convenience goods markets, for which marketing, innovation and customer service are key drivers. TOTAL markets specialty products in more than sixty countries and intends to develop by combining organic growth and targeted acquisitions. This development is focused on high-growth markets and the marketing of innovative products with high added value that meet the Group’s sustainable developmentSustainable Development approach.

The Hutchinson consumer goods business (Mapa®In 2013, consolidated worldwide sales of specialty chemicals activities (excluding Resins) totaled5.7 billion, stable compared to 2012 and Spontex®) was divested in spring 2010. Sales for the divested lines of business were530 million in 2009.up 7% compared to 2011.

The Cray Valley coating resins and Sartomer photocure resins businesses were divested in July 2011. Sales forHowever, the divested lines of business were860 million in 2010. The structural and hydrocarbon resins business lines were kept and have been incorporated into the PetrochemicalsPolymer division.

Specialty Chemicals enjoyed a favorable climate in the first three quarters of 2011 due to the resilience of the European and North American markets and continued growth in the emerging countries. The situation deteriorated in the fourth quarter. In this context and on a like-for-like basis (excluding Mapa Spontex and Resins), 2011 sales were5.3 billion, a 9% increase compared to 2010.

Elastomer processing

Hutchinson manufactures and markets products derived from elastomer processing that are principally intended for the automotive, aerospace and defense industries.

Hutchinson, amongAmong the industry’s leaders worldwide(2)(6), Hutchinson provides its customers with innovative solutions in the areas of fluid transfer, air and fluid seals, anti-vibration, sound and thermal insulation, and transmission and mobility.

Hutchinson has eightyeighty-four production sites worldwide, including fifty-twofifty-six in Europe, fifteenseventeen in North America, sevensix in Asia, four in South America five in Asia and one in Africa.

Hutchinson’s sales in 2013 were2.993.28 billion, in 2011, up 10%3% compared to 2010. Sales2012. Despite the difficulties experienced by the European automotive sector, sales for the automotive business increased 11%by 5% due to stable sales on the Europeangrowth of the Asian and North American markets and increased sales on the Latin American and Chinese markets.market share in Europe. On the industrial markets, sales increased at a lower rate becauseby 1%, mainly due to the increased sales on the civil aerospace that offset contraction of the decline in the business planes, helicopters and defense markets, while sales on other industrial markets (e.g., civil aviation, railway, and offshore) saw similar rises to the automotive business.markets.

To strengthen its position in the aerospace industry, in late 2008 Hutchinson acquired Strativer, a French company specialized in the growing composite materials market, and, in early 2011, Hutchinson acquired Kaefer in 2011, a German company specializedspecializing in aircraft interior equipment (insulation,(e.g., insulation, ventilation ducts, etc.).ducts) and the Canadian company Marquez specializing in air-conditioning circuits at the end of 2012. In the automotive sector, in April 2011 Hutchinson acquired Keum-Ah in 2011, a South Korean company specializedspecializing in fluid transfer systems.

Hutchinson closed the Oyartzun production plant in Spain at the end of 2012.

In July 2013, Hutchinson divested 30% of its automobile brake hose business in Spain (Palamos) through the creation of a joint venture with Japanese company Nichirin, one of the world leaders in this segment. Elsewhere, in July 2013, Hutchinson acquired Gasket International, a company based in Italy and China, which specializes in the production of sealing parts for valves for the oil and gas industry.

(1)Nitrogen oxide emissions are noxious to the environment and subject to regulation.
(2)Based on publicly available information, consolidated sales.

Hutchinson continues to develop in expandingstrong growth potential markets primarily Eastern Europe, South America and China, relying notably onamong the Brasov (Romania), Lodz (Poland), Sousse (Tunisia)most dynamic and Suzhou (China) sitesstrongest customers. Hutchinson continuously strives to innovate, offering its customers high-performance materials and onhigh-value added solutions capable of performing the Casa Branca site (Brazil) opened in 2011.most demanding functions.

Adhesives

Adhesives

Bostik is one of the world leaders in the adhesive sector(1)and has significant positions on the industrial, hygiene and construction markets, complemented by both consumer and professional distribution channels.

Bostik has forty-six production sites worldwide, including twenty-oneeighteen in Europe, nine in North America, seveneight in Asia, six in AustraliaAustralia-New Zealand, three in South America and New Zealand, two in Africa and one in South America.Africa.

In 2011, salesSales were1.431.51 billion upin 2013, a decrease of 3% compared to 2010.2012.

Bostik continues to strengthen its technological positionpositions in the construction and industrial sectors, pursue its program for innovationdifferentiation focused mainly on sustainable development, keep up withan offering of innovative bonding solutions, continue its expansion in high-growth countries and improve its operational performance.

2011 sawConsequently, following the start-up of twoa new production unitsunit in Egypt and Vietnam and the opening of a new regional technology center for Asia in Shanghai. In addition,Shanghai in 2012, Bostik plans to commissioninaugurated in 2013 a thirdnew production unit in Changshu, China, in 2012, which is expected to bewill ultimately become Bostik’s largest production plant worldwide. Inin the United States, Bostik acquired StarQuartz in 2011, increasing its range of construction adhesives.world.

Finally,

(1)

Including ethanol from ETBE (Ethyl-tertio-butyl-ether) and biomethanol from bio-MTBE (Methyl-tertio-butyl-ether), expressed in ethanol equivalent. Reference for bio content of ETBE and bio-MTBE is the RED directive.

(2)

PCK and Zeeland Refinery included (TOTAL share).

(3)

PCK and Zeeland Refinery included (TOTAL share). TotalErg (100% JV) included.

(4)

VOME: Vegetable-Oil-Methyl-Ester. Including HVO (Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil).

(5)

Including TotalErg’s Rome and Trecate refinery/depots and TotalErg depots in Italy (100% TotalErg). PCK and Zeeland Refinery included (TOTAL share).

(6)

Based on publicly available information, 2013 consolidated sales.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.39


Item 4 - Business Overview

Bostik continued to rationalize its industrial base in 2013 with the closureshutdown of the Ibos siteproduction in France, which cameDublin, Ireland, Barcelona, Spain, Lisbon, Portugal and Zhuhai, China. A workshop was also shut down in Leicester, United Kingdom.

Finally, in 2013, Bostik launched its new visual identity, designed to transform Bostik into effect at year-end 2011.a more visible worldwide brand that will gradually replace some forty local brands.

Electroplating

Atotech is the second largestleading company in the electroplating sector based on worldwide sales(1). It is active onin the markets for electronics (printed circuits, semiconductors) and general metal finishingsurface treatments (automotive, construction, furnishing).

Atotech has sixteenseventeen production sites worldwide, including seven in Asia, six in Europe, twothree in North America and one in South America.

Atotech’s sales wereSales totaled0.89 billion in 2011, up 14%2013, a decrease of 8% compared to 20102012, mainly due to favorable conditions on allthe slump in the sales of its marketselectroplating

equipment and the divestment of a significant increase in equipment sales on the electronics market.commodities reselling activities (anodes).

In order to strengthen its position on the electronics market, in 2011 Atotech started up a new production unit aimed at the semiconductors market in Neuruppin (Germany) and acquired adhesive technologies (molecular interfaces) in the nanotechnology sector in the United States.

2013, Atotech successfully pursuedcontinued to pursue its strategy designed to differentiate its products through a comprehensive service provided to its customers in terms of equipment, processes, design and chemical products and through the development of green, innovative technologies to reduce the environmental footprint. This strategy relies on global coverage provided by its technical centers located near customers.

In order to strengthen its position in the electronics market, Atotech started up a new production unit in 2011 aimed at the semiconductors market in Neuruppin (Germany) and acquired adhesive technologies (molecular interfaces) in the nanotechnology sector in the United States. In addition, a new equipment production site is expected to be opened in China in the third quarter of 2014.

Atotech intends to continue to develop in Asia, which already represents almost 60%approximately 65% of its global sales.

 

 

Trading & Shipping

Trading & Shipping’s main focus is serving the Group, and its activities primarily involve:

selling and marketing the Group’s crude oil production;

providing a supply of crude oil for the Group’s refineries;

importing and exporting the appropriate petroleum and refined products for the Group’s refineries to be able to adjust their production to the needs of local markets;

chartering appropriate ships for these activities; and

undertaking trading on various derivatives markets.

Trading & Shipping conducts its activities worldwide through various wholly-owned subsidiaries, including TOTSA Total Oil Trading S.A., Atlantic Trading & Marketing Inc., Total Trading Asia

Pte, Total Trading and Marketing Canada L.P., Total Trading Atlantique S.A. and Chartering & Shipping Services S.A.

Trading

TOTAL is one of the world’s largest traders of crude oil and refined products on the basis of volumes traded. The table below sets forth selected information with respect to Trading’s worldwide crude oil sales and supply sources and refined products sales for each of the past three years.

Trading of physical volumes of crude oil and refined products amounted to 4.5 Mb/d in 2013.

Trading’s crude oil sales and supply and refined products sales(a)

(kb/d)  2013   2012   2011 

Group’s worldwide liquids production

   1,167     1,220     1,226  

Purchased by Trading from Exploration & Production

   916     976     960  

Purchased by Trading from external suppliers

   1,994     1,904     1,833  

Total of Trading’s supply

   2,910     2,880     2,793  

Sales by Trading to Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments

   1,556     1,569     1,524  

Sales by Trading to external customers

   1,354     1,311     1,269  

Total of Trading’s sales

   2,910     2,880     2,793  

Total of Trading’s refined products sales

   1,628     1,608     1,632  

(a) 

Including condensates.

Trading operates extensively on physical and derivatives markets, both organized and over the counter. In connection with its trading activities, TOTAL, like most other oil companies, uses derivative energy instruments (futures, forwards, swaps and options) to adjust its exposure to fluctuations in the price of crude oil and refined products. These transactions are entered into with various counterparties.

For additional information concerning derivatives transactions by Trading & Shipping, see Notes 30 (Financial instruments related to

commodity contracts) and 31 (Market risks) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

All of TOTAL’s trading activities are subject to strict internal controls and trading limits.

In 2013, the global oil market was balanced and oil prices fell slightly from 2012. Crude oil prices were subject to increased backwardation(2). Crude oil prices in North America benefited from a significant reduction in the price spread between the crude

(1)

Based on publicly available information, 2013 consolidated sales.

(2)

“Backwardation” is a term used to describe an energy market in which the value of the spot, or prompt, price is higher than the value of the forward or futures contracts trading concurrently. The reverse situation is described as “contango”.

40TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

markers WTI (West Texas Intermediate, confined to the central United States and subject to a local production surplus) and Dated Brent (delivered in the North Sea and accessible to the

international crude market). Freight rates decreased in 2013 due to an ever-growing availability in charter capacities.

         2013   2012   2011   2013/12   min 2013   max 2013 

Brent ICE — 1st Line(a)

   ($/b)     108.70     111.68     110.91     -2.7%     97.69     (Apr 17)     118.90     (Feb 8)  

Brent ICE — 12th Line(b)

   ($/b)     103.04     106.66     108.12     -3.4%     95.95     (Apr 17)     110.50     (Feb 13)  

Backwardation time structure (1st — 12th)

   ($/b)     5.67     5.01     2.79     13.1%     11.37     (Sep 3)     1.74     (Apr 17)  

WTI NYMEX — 1st Line(a)

   ($/b)     98.05     94.15     95.11     4.1%     86.68     (Feb 13)     110.53     (May 4)  

WTI vs. Brent 1st Line

   ($/b)     -10.66     -17.53     -15.80     -39.2%     -23.18     (Feb 8)     -0.02     (Jul 19)  

Gasoil ICE — 1st Line(a)

   ($/t)     918.98     953.42     933.30     -3.6%     822.75     (May 1)     1,030.75     (Feb 18)  

ICE Gasoil vs ICE Brent

   ($/b)     14.65     16.30     14.36     -10.1%     9.20     (May 2)     19.62     (Feb 11)  

(a)

1st Line: quotation on ICE or NYMEX Futures for first nearby month delivery.

(b)

12th Line: quotation on ICE Futures for twelfth nearby month delivery.

In 2013, Trading’s activities were affected by the global economic environment described below. After a slow-down worldwide during the first quarter of 2013, economic growth began a gradual recovery, pulling the Eurozone out of six quarters of recession by the second quarter of 2013. This slight improvement came to a halt in the third quarter under the impact of significant exchange rate fluctuations in emerging markets and the budget debate in the United States.

In this context, growth in the demand for oil nevertheless remained constant (+1.1 Mb/d(1), nearly identical to 2012). Diesel fuel and gasoline led this growth (+0.4 Mb/d each), while demand for fuel oil contracted (-0.2 Mb/d) due to efficiency gains among shipowners and reduced demand from Japanese power generators. The increase in oil demand was focused in Asia and the Middle East (+0.6 Mb/d in total), while demand in Europe decreased (-0.2 Mb/d).

Estimated global oil supplies stagnated in 2013, increasing by only +0.2 Mb/d after jumping +2.7 Mb/d in 2012. Non-OPEC production grew by approximately +1.0 Mb/d, increasing by +1.2 Mb/d in North America (United States and Canada), which offset declining or stagnating output in other countries.

Overall OPEC production decreased by 1.0 Mb/d, with crude oil production decreasing by 1.1 Mb/d. Significant crude oil production capacity was made unavailable (more than 3 Mb/d in the third quarter, compared to approximately 2 Mb/d at the start of 2013), thereby limiting the supply from certain countries due to, among other reasons, sanctions imposed on Iran, conflicts in Libya and acts of sabotage in Nigeria and Iraq. Saudi Arabia increased its production during the course of 2013 to help maintain market equilibrium, which sharply reduced OPEC’s excess capacity.

The differential between supply and demand narrowed in 2013, dropping from +1.2 Mb/d in 2012 to +0.3 Mb/d due to the increase in demand and flat supply, thereby slowing the anticipated increase in global oil stocks.

Crude oil prices started 2013 on an upward trend, with Dated Brent hitting a high of $119.03/b on February 8. Prices then steadily fell, driven downward by the deteriorating economic environment in Europe and an oversupplied crude market, to reach a low of $96.83/b on April 17. The price of Dated Brent stabilized during the second quarter of 2013 at a level between $100/b and $105/b. Market tensions in the third quarter drove the price of Dated Brent back upward ($117.12/b on September 6), before prices subsequently leveled off below $110/b.

On the futures market, the backwardation of ICE Brent contract prices increased as a result of the same supply tensions that lifted spot (Dated Brent) prices in the first quarter of 2013. This backwardation decreased considerably during the second quarter with the seasonal drop in demand for crude oil, mainly due to planned refinery shutdowns for maintenance. The post-maintenance resumption of refining activity and new supply tensions drove backwardation to a maximum of $11/b toward the end of August before it decreased again late in the year.

The year 2013 was also marked by the narrowing of the crude price spread between WTI and Dated Brent. Extension of the Seaway pipeline from Cushing, Oklahoma, to the Texas coast of the Gulf of Mexico between January and April, along with the commissioning of additional pipelines from the Permian Basin in western Texas to the Gulf of Mexico in the second quarter, helped to restore balance in the central U.S. market. The crude price spread between WTI and Dated Brent consequently fell from around $20/b in January/February 2013 to around $4/b in July/August. This price spread widened once again beginning in the third quarter with the continuing rapid increase in domestic U.S. crude production and only moderate increases in demand.

While global refining capacity grew by approximately +0.9 Mb/d in 2013, crude throughputs increased by only approximately +0.4 Mb/d, held back by weaker refining margins. The weak margins reflect the growing surplus in global refining capacity. Asian refiners dominated the increases in refinery throughputs and capacity (+0.6 Mb/d and +1.0 Mb/d, respectively).

Shipping

The transportation of crude oil and refined products necessary for the activities of the Group is arranged by Shipping. These requirements are fulfilled through balanced use of the spot and time-charter markets. A rigorous safety policy is applied by Shipping mainly through a strict selection of chartered vessels. Like a certain number of other oil companies and shipowners, the Group uses freight rate derivative contracts to adjust its exposure to freight rate fluctuations.

In 2013, Trading & Shipping chartered more than 3,000 voyages to transport approximately 115 Mt of crude oil and refined products. As of December 31, 2013, Trading & Shipping employed a fleet of forty-six vessels, none of which were single-hulled, that were chartered under long-term or medium-term agreements (including seven LPG carriers). The fleet has an average age of approximately five years.

(1)

TOTAL estimates.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.41


Item 4 - Business Overview

Freight rate averages of three representative routes for crude transportation

         2013   2012   2011   min 2013   max 2013 

VLCC Ras Tanura Chiba — BITR(a)

   ($/t)     11.83     12.82     11.99     8.95     (Jan 29)     18.99     (Nov 20)  

Suezmax Bonny Philadelphia — BITR

   ($/t)     13.41     14.44     13.86     9.45     (Oct 2)     25.58     (Dec 18)  

Aframax Sullom Voe Wilhemshaven — BITR

   ($/t)     7.02     6.48     6.51     6.04     (Feb 1)     14.16     (Dec 24)  

(a)

VLCC: Very Large Crude Carrier. BITR : Baltic International Tanker Routes.

The first nine months of 2013 were a difficult period for the oil shipping sector, particularly for larger crude tankers. Conditions were more favorable, meanwhile, for petroleum product carriers. At the same time, marine bunker prices remained high with a knock-on effect on transport costs.

Global demand for the transport of crude oil stabilized in 2013 after posting an increase of more than 5% among larger-sized vessels in 2012. This situation was attributable mainly to a decrease in North American imports due to an increase in local production in that region. This was partially offset by an increase in demand in Asia, particularly in China, which has been diversifying its supply from more distant sources (South America, Western Africa). The increase in tonnage continued to be strong, weakening the balance between supply and demand to historic levels. This led to

record lows in VLCC freight rates through the end of the third quarter. The closing months of 2013 saw a reversal in crude oil freight rates, which reached a record annual level due to especially strong ongoing demand for deliveries to Asia from the Atlantic Basin.

The situation in the petroleum product shipping market was better overall than in the crude oil shipping market. Demand for the transport of petroleum products was particularly strong, with arbitrage in favor of longer routes, especially to Asia (notably the flow of naphtha from Europe to Asia on large carriers). Starting in early 2013, freight rates induced ship owners to resume ordering petroleum product tankers (MR and LR2(1)), a sector in which growth had moderated.

MARKETING & SERVICESSEGMENT

The Marketing & Services segment was created on January 1, 2012, following the reorganization of the Downstream and Chemicals segments, and includes worldwide supply and marketing activities in the oil products field, as well as, since July 1, 2012, the activity of New Energies(2).

Marketing & Services

TOTAL is one of the leading marketers in Western Europe(3). It is also the leader(4)in Africa and certain Middle Eastern countries.

TOTAL sells a wide range of products produced from its refineries and other facilities in approximately 150 countries(5). TOTAL is among the key players in the specialty products market, in particular for lubricants, LPG, jet fuel, special fluids, bitumen, heavy fuels and marine fuels.

TOTAL also sells numerous services for consumers and professionals in the mobility, residential and industrial sectors.

As part of its activities, Marketing & Services holds stakes in five refineries in Africa, one in Europe through its share in TotalErg (49%) and one in the Caribbean.

Marketing & Services follows a proactive, primarily organic, development strategy involving the shifting of positions to high-growth areas.

Europe

TOTAL operates a network of more than 8,850 service stations in Europe located throughout France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Germany as well as Italy through its stake in TotalErg (49%). The Group is a major player in the market for fuel-payment cards, with nearly 3.8 million cards issued in twenty-seven European countries.

In specialty products, the Group benefits from its extensive presence in Europe and relies on numerous industrial facilities to

produce lubricants (mainly Rouen in France and Ertvelde in Belgium), special fluids (Oudalle in France), bitumen (Brunsbüttel in Germany) and grease (Baisieux in France).

InWestern Europe, TOTAL continued to optimize its Marketing business in 2013.

InFrance, the dense network includes more than 1,600 TOTAL-branded service stations, 600 Total Access stations (service station concept combining low prices and premium TOTAL-branded fuels and services) and 1,550 Elan service stations, which are located mainly in rural areas.

In addition, TOTAL’s GR (fuel and service cards) offering was expanded in 2013, helping to consolidate the Group’s leading position in the provision of solutions to road transport professionals.

TOTAL leads the heating oil market in France(6), with seven local subsidiaries covering the entire country. TOTAL continued its diversification strategy in 2013, with the commercial launch of wood pellets and online sale of fuel through fioulmarket.fr, France’s first website for heating oil consumers.

In petroleum products logistics, Marketing & Services finalized the implementation of a new organization at the end of 2012. As a result of this adaptation, TOTAL now holds stakes in twenty-three depots, of which it operates seven.

InItaly, TotalErg (49%) has a network of more than 3,000 service stations, which makes it the third-largest operator in

(1)

MR: Medium Range — 50,000 DWT (deadweight tonnage); LR2: Long Range — 110,000 DWT.

(2)

As a result of the reorganization, certain information has been restated.

(3)

Publicly available information, based on quantities sold (2013).

(4)

PFC Energy and Company data.

(5)

Including via national distributors.

(6)

CPDP 2013 and Company data.

42TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

the country. As part of an asset optimization strategy, TotalErg ceased production at its Rome refinery in late 2012 and subsequently converted that site into a logistics hub for petroleum products storage.

In theUnited Kingdom, TOTAL retains a market presence through its specialty products activities, particularly lubricants and jet fuel. In 2011, the Group sold its network of service stations and its fuel and heating oil marketing business in the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.

InNorthern, Central and Eastern Europe, TOTAL continued in 2013 to expand its direct presence in these growing markets, in particular for lubricants and bitumen. The Group specifically accelerated growth of its business in specialty products, including bitumen, in Russia and launched a marketing subsidiary in Kazakhstan.

TOTAL also operates a network of 731 AS24-branded service stations dedicated to commercial transporters in twenty-seven European countries. The Group continued developing its business in 2013 in Turkey, where it opened a new subsidiary. The AS24 network is expected to continue to grow, mainly through expansion in the Mediterranean Basin and Russia and through its toll payment card service, which covers more than seventeen countries.

Africa & the Middle East

TOTAL is the leading marketer of petroleum products on the African continent and in certain Middle Eastern countries, with a market share averaging 13%(1)in 2013. The Group operates more than 4,700 service stations in more than forty countries in these high-growth markets, including major networks in South Africa, Turkey, Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt and Morocco.

InEgypt, TOTAL signed agreements with Shell (May 2013) and Chevron (August 2013) with a view to developing its network of service stations and wholesale business. After the closing of these transactions, the Group will become the second-largest private operator in Africa’s largest market, with a 14% network(2)market share.

As part of the optimization of its portfolio, the Group undertook processes to open up the share capital of selected subsidiaries to local investors to enhance its local presence.

InJordan, TOTAL continued developing its service station network and wholesale business following its acquisition of a distribution license there in 2012.

TOTAL is pursuing its strategy for growth in the specialty products markets. The Group, which relies in particular on the lubricants blending plant in Dubai, started up new plants in Egypt in 2012 and in Saudi Arabia in October 2013.

Moreover, TOTAL has become a leading partner for mining customers by delivering supply chain and management solutions for fuels and lubricants.

Asia-Pacific

At year-end 2013, TOTAL was present in more than twenty countries in the Asia-Pacific region, where the Group is strengthening its position in the distribution of fuels and specialty products. In the lubricants sector in particular, TOTAL continues to grow in the region, with a 6.3% increase in lubricant sales in 2013 compared with 2012.

TOTAL operates service stations in China, Pakistan, the Philippines, Cambodia and Indonesia and is a significant player in the Pacific Islands.

InChina, the Group was operating approximately 200 service stations at year-end 2013 through two joint ventures with Sinochem and a wholly-owned subsidiary. In October 2013, the Group opened its third lubricants blending plant in China. Located in Tianjin, this state-of-the-art plant has a capacity of 200 kt/y.

InPakistan, through its local partner PARCO, TOTAL announced in August 2013 its acquisition of Chevron’s distribution network. Pending approval from the relevant authorities, this transaction encompasses the management of more than 500 service stations as well as Chevron’s fuel business and storage sites.

InIndia, TOTAL continued to strengthen its positions in the lubricants and LPG sectors with the expansion of its LPG network to thirty-three stations in 2013. In 2012, TOTAL also inaugurated its first lubricants, bitumen, special fluids and additives technical center outside of Europe.

InVietnam, TOTAL continued to strengthen its presence in the specialty products market. The Group became one of the leaders in the Vietnamese LPG market with the acquisition of Vinagas in 2012.

InSingapore, TOTAL announced in March 2013 the construction of a lubricants blending plant with a capacity of 310 kt/y to assist in meeting inland and marine lubricants demand in the Asia-Pacific region.

Americas

InLatin America and theCaribbean, TOTAL is active directly in about twenty countries and indirectly (via distributors) in about ten more countries in the markets of specialty products (lubricants and special fluids) and fuels (service station network, wholesale, aviation). The Group holds a significant position(3) in the Caribbean fuel distribution business.

In theUnited States andCanada, TOTAL mainly markets specialty products, particularly lubricants, jet fuels and special fluids. To strengthen its special fluids business, the Group took on a project to build a special fluids production plant near Houston, Texas, which is expected to be operational at the beginning of 2015.

TOTAL operates a significant number of industrial units throughout the Americas (production of lubricants, storage and conditioning of LPG) and owns a 50% stake in SARA (Société anonyme de la raffinerie des Antilles) in Martinique.

(1)

Market share in the countries where the Group operates, based on 2013 publicly available information, quantities sold.

(2)

PFC Energy.

(3)

Present in multiple Caribbean islands including Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Haiti, Martinique and Guadeloupe.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.43


Item 4 - Business Overview

Sales of refined products

The table below sets forth TOTAL’s sales of refined products by region:

(kb/d)  2013   2012   2011 

France

   575     566     574  

Europe, excluding France(a)

   564     594     881  

Americas

   86     53     56  

Africa

   326     307     304  

Rest of the World

   198     190     172  

Total excluding Trading and refinery bulk sales

   1,749     1,710     1,987  

Trading

   1,155     1,161     1,215  

Refinery bulk sales

   514     532     437  

Total including Trading and refinery bulk sales

   3,418     3,403     3,639  

(a)

Including the Group’s share in CEPSA (up to end of July 2011).

For data on biofuels, refer to”— Refining & Chemicals — Refining & Petrochemicals — Development of new avenues for the production of fuels and polymers”, above.

Service stations

The table below sets forth the number of service stations of the Group (excluding AS24):

As of December 31,  2013   2012   2011 

France(a)

   3,813     3,911     4,046  

Europe, excluding France

   5,062     5,200     5,375  

of which TotalErg

   3,017     3,161     3,355  

Africa

   3,726     3,601     3,464  

Rest of the World

   2,219     2,013     1,934  

Total

   14,820     14,725     14,819  

(a)

TOTAL, Total Access, Elf and Elan-branded service stations.

Product and services developments

TOTAL continued in 2013 its technical and R&D partnerships in Formula 1 with Renault Sport F1, in the WRC with Citroën Racing and in endurance racing with Toyota. The purpose of these partnerships is to demonstrate TOTAL’s technical excellence in the formulation of fuels and lubricants under extreme conditions and restrictions on fuel consumption. The TOTAL brand was associated with two Formula 1 world titles in 2013.

TOTAL continued its Clean Energy Partnership (CEP) in Germany, which is centered on hydrogen distribution. TOTAL currently has five demonstration stations for hydrogen distribution in Germany. A new hydrogen station is scheduled to open near the new airport in Berlin during the first half of 2014. TOTAL signed an agreement with Daimler in 2013 for the joint development of eight new stations under the CEP. Along with its partners in the “H2 Mobility” initiative, TOTAL also signed a preliminary agreement covering the implementation of an action plan targeting construction of a network of hydrogen stations throughout Germany. It is anticipated that this network will have approximately 400 stations by 2023 (subject to deployment of more than 250,000 fuel-cell electric vehicles).

TOTAL has approximately twenty prototype electric vehicle fueling stations in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and France. The demonstration program of the distribution of electricity (fast charge) intended for electric vehicles continued at these stations in 2013.

TOTAL undertook within its European subsidiaries additional studies in 2013 into the potential of LNG as a fuel for heavy duty vehicles. The development of at least two pilot stations is scheduled for 2014.

In response to global market developments and looking ahead to future growth opportunities, TOTAL developed and tested five new

energy optimization offerings among consumers and corporate customers in 2013 based on multi-energy production (fuels, gas, photovoltaic, wood) and energy efficiency services (audit, monitoring, management).

New Energies

New Energies is developing renewable energies that will, in combination with hydrocarbons, help establish a more diversified energy mix while also generating lower CO2 emissions. In meeting this objective, TOTAL is focusing on two main development axes: solar energy, which benefits from unlimited energetic resources, particularly in certain geographical zones where the Group has a significant presence, and the transformation of biomass through use of biotechnology, which aims to develop new biosourced product solutions for transport and chemicals. The Group keeps an active watch on other renewable energies not classified as priority areas for development at this time.

Solar energy

TOTAL is developing upstream operations through industrial production and downstream marketing activities in the photovoltaic sector based on crystalline silicon technology. The Group is also pursuing R&D in this field through several industrial and academic partnerships.

The economic context in this sector is currently stabilizing following two years of sharp price decreases that drove many players out of the market. Competitiveness in photovoltaic solar energy has improved and significant technical achievements have supported the emergence for the first time of markets that are profitable without subsidization.

44TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Business Overview

SunPower

As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL held a 64.65% stake in SunPower, a U.S. company listed on NASDAQ (NASDAQ: SPWR) and based in San José, California. SunPower is an integrated player that designs, manufactures and supplies the highest-efficiency solar panels in the market.(1) SunPower is active throughout the solar chain, from photovoltaic cell production based on crystalline silicon to the design and construction of large turnkey power plants, as well as the commercialization of solar solutions for residential and commercial markets.

Upstream, SunPower manufactures all of its cells in Asia (Philippines, Malaysia) and has a total production capacity of 1,300 MW/y. The company is continuing to adjust its production capacity while maintaining its technological leadership through a significant R&D program. The cells are assembled into modules, or solar panels, in plants located in Asia, the United States, Mexico, Europe and South Africa. A 350 MW expansion in capacity was approved at the end of 2013 for start-up of production in 2015.

Downstream, SunPower markets its panels worldwide for applications ranging from residential roof tiles to large solar power plants.

In the United States, SunPower completed the construction in 2013 of the California Valley Solar Ranch, solar power plant (CVSR, 314 MWp), and started up the plant at the world’s largest solar farm, Solar Star (709 MWp), sold to NRG Energy and MidAmerican, respectively, at the time of the investment decision.

TOTAL and SunPower also launched new solar power plant projects in Chile and South Africa in 2013. In Chile, SunPower is both supplying panels for and constructing the Salvador plant (70 MWp) in cooperation with TOTAL. The project, in which TOTAL is a 20% shareholder, is 70% financed by OPIC, the U.S. development finance institution. The electricity produced will be sold on the spot market and used to power the Chilean electricity grid.

In South Africa, subsequent to a tender offer, TOTAL and SunPower were selected by the South African government to build a free-standing 86 MWp solar power plant. TOTAL is a 27% shareholder in the project, while SunPower will supply the solar panels and construct the plant, which will sell the electricity produced under an energy purchase agreement.

In Asia, SunPower was selected in September 2013 to become the main supplier of panels (69 MWp) to the largest solar power plant in Japan, located in the Aomori Prefecture.

Other solar assets

The Shams 1 solar power plant (109 MW of parabolic concentrated solar power) in Abu Dhabi was commissioned in September 2013 with production being sold to the Abu Dhabi Water Electricity Company (ADWEC). TOTAL (20%) will take part in its operation for a 25-year period.

TOTAL owns a 50% interest in the French company Sunzil, which markets photovoltaic panels overseas.

Elsewhere, the Group is continuing initiatives to display solar application solutions as part of decentralized rural electrification projects in a number of countries, including in South Africa via Kwazulu Energy Services Company (KES), in which TOTAL holds a 35% stake.

Photovoltech, a Belgian company (50%) specialized in manufacturing multicrystalline photovoltaic cells, was put into liquidation in October 2013 after having ceased operations in late 2012.

New solar technologies

In order to strengthen its technological leadership in the crystalline silicon field, and in addition to its cooperation with SunPower in the R&D field, New Energies partners with leading laboratories and research institutes in France and abroad. The aim of these partnerships is to optimize the photovoltaic solar chain (silicon, wafers, cells, modules and systems) by cutting production costs and multiplying its applications, while increasing the efficiency of the components in terms of electric conversion.

In this regard, TOTAL is working with the IMEC (Interuniversity MicroElectronics Center — Belgium) and the École Polytechnique’s LPICM (Laboratory of physics of interfaces and thin layers), which specializes in plasma-deposition processes at low temperatures. Further to this partnership, TOTAL and, principally, the CNRS, the École Polytechnique and EDF signed in October 2013 a funding agreement with the National Research Agency (ANR) concerning the IPVF (Institut Photovoltaïque d’Île-de-France), which, with its team of nearly 200 researchers, aims to eventually become one of the main centers worldwide conducting research into latest-generation photovoltaic devices.

With respect to electricity storage, TOTAL is continuing its R&D program with renowned institutions such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States to develop a new battery technology, and is investing in start-ups including Ambri (11%), founded at MIT, as well as Lightsail and Enervault, also based in the United States.

Biotechnologies and the conversion of biomass

TOTAL is exploring a number of opportunities for developing biomass depending on its nature, accessibility and sustainability. The Group’s objective is to sell high-performance molecules in targeted markets (fuel, lubricants, special polymers, chemicals, etc.). The focus of New Energies is on the biochemical conversion process for this biomass.

Amyris Inc., a U.S. company listed on NASDAQ (NASDAQ: AMRS), was identified for TOTAL’s first significant equity investment in biotechnology. At year-end 2013, TOTAL held 17.9% of the company. A collaboration agreement with Amyris has been signed covering research (including the formation of a shared research team), development, production and marketing activities relating to biosourced molecules. Amyris owns a cutting-edge industrial synthetic biological platform designed to create and optimize micro-organisms that can convert sugars into molecules of interest through fermentation. Amyris also owns a research laboratory and pilot units in California and Brazil. In early 2013, Amyris started up an industrial production site for farnesene, which is used in the production of renewable diesel and kerosene, in Brotas, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

At the end of 2013, TOTAL and Amyris created Total Amyris Biosolutions, a 50/50 joint venture that holds the exclusive rights and intellectual property in relation to farnesene.

(1)

For additional information, see“— Other Matters — Environmental protection — Sustainable use of resources — Energy efficiency”, below.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.45


Item 4

In addition, the Group continues to develop a global network of R&D partnerships in technology segments that are complementary to Amyris’ platform (deconstruction of lignocellulose, synthetic biology, metabolism engineering), including with Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI, United States), Novogy (United States), Gevo Inc. (NASDAQ: GEVO, United States), the University of Wageningen (Netherlands) and the Toulouse White Biotechnology consortium (TWB) (France).

The Group is also studying the longer-term potential for developing a cost-effective phototrophic process for producing biomolecules through the bio-engineering of microalgae and associated processes. An exploratory research agreement was signed with

the Grenoble CEA (Atomic and Alternative Energies Commission) in late 2013, and two development projects are underway with the AlgaePark consortium in the Netherlands.

Other renewable energies

In the field of wind power, TOTAL owns a 12 MW wind farm in Mardyck (near Dunkirk, France), which was commissioned in 2003.

In marine energy, TOTAL holds a 26.7% share in Scotrenewables Tidal Power, located in the Orkney Islands in Scotland. Tests on a 250 kW prototype have been successfully completed. A 2 MW commercial model is being developed.

OTHER MATTERS

 

 

Various factors, including certain events or circumstances discussed below, have affected or may affect TOTAL’s business and results.

Exploration and production legal considerations

TOTAL’s exploration and production operations are conductedUpstream segment conducts activities in various countries andwhich are therefore subject to a broad range of regulations. These cover virtually all aspects of exploration and production operations,

including leasehold rights, production rates, royalties, environmental protection, exports, taxes and foreign exchange rates. The terms of the concessions, licenses, permits and contracts governing the Group’s ownership of oil and gas interests vary from country to country. These concessions, licenses, permits and contracts are generally granted by or entered into with a government entity or a state-owned company and are sometimes entered into with private owners. These arrangements usually take the form of concessions or production sharing contracts.

(1)Based on publicly available information, consolidated sales.

TheIn the framework of oil concession agreement remains the traditional model for agreements, entered into with States: the oil company owns the assets and the facilities and is entitled to the entire production.

In exchange, the operating risks, costs and investments are the oil company’s responsibility and it agrees to remit to the relevant State, usually the owner of the subsoil resources, a production-based royalty, income tax, and possibly other taxes that may apply under local tax legislation.

The production sharing contract (PSC) involves a more complex legal framework than the concession agreement: it defines the terms and conditions of production sharing and sets the rules governing the cooperation between the company or consortium in possession of the license and the host State, which is generally represented by a state-owned company. The latter can thus be involved in operating decisions, cost accounting and production allocation.

The consortium agrees to undertake and finance all exploration, development and production activities at its own risk. In exchange, it is entitled to a portion of the production, known as “cost oil”, the sale of which should cover all of these expenses (investments and operating costs). The balance of production, known as “profit oil”, is then shared in varying proportions, between the company or consortium, on the one hand, and with the State or the state-owned company, on the other hand.

In some instances, concession agreements and PSCs coexist, sometimes in the same country. Even though there are other

contractual models, TOTAL’s license portfolio is comprised mainly of concession agreements.

In every country, the authorities of the host State, often assisted by international accounting firms, perform joint venture and PSC cost audits and ensure the observance of contractual obligations.

In some countries, TOTAL has also signed contracts called “risked service contracts”, which are similar to production sharing contracts. However, the profit oil is replaced by risked monetary remuneration, agreed by contract, which depends notably on the field performance. Thus,For example, the remuneration under the Halfaya Iraqi contract is based on an amount calculated per barrel produced.

Oil and gas exploration and production activities are subject to authorization granted by public authorities (licenses), which are granted for specific and limited periods of time and include an obligation to return a large portion, or the entire portion in case of failure, of the area covered by the license at the end of the exploration period.

TOTAL pays taxes on income generated from its oil and gas production and sales activities under its concessions, production sharing contracts and risked service contracts, as provided for by local regulations. In addition, depending on the country, TOTAL’s production and sales activities may be subject to a number of other taxes, fees and withholdings, including special petroleum taxes and fees. The taxes imposed on oil and gas production and sales activities may be substantially higher than those imposed on other industrial or commercial businesses.

The legal framework of TOTAL’s exploration and production activities, established through concessions, licenses, permits and contracts granted by or entered into with a government entity, a state-owned company or, sometimes, private owners, is subject to certain risks that, in certain cases, can reduce or challenge the protections offered by this legal framework.

IndustrialManagement and environmental considerations

TOTAL’s operations involve certainmonitoring of industrial and environmental risks which are inherent in handling, processing and use

TOTAL policies regarding health, safety and the environment

TOTAL has developed a “Health Safety Environment Quality Charter”(see “— Health Safety Environment Quality Charter”, below) that sets out the basic principles applicable within the Group regarding the protection of products that are flammable, explosive, polluting or toxic.

The broad scope of TOTAL’s activities, which include drilling, oil and gas production, on-site processing, transportation, refining and petrochemical activities, storage and distribution of petroleum products, and production of base and specialty chemicals, involve a wide range of operational risks. Among these risks are those of explosion, fire, leakage of toxic products, and pollution. In the transportation area, the type of risk depends not only on the hazardous nature of the products transported, but also on the transportation methods used (mainly pipelines, maritime, river-maritime, rail, road), the volumes involved,people, property and the sensitivityenvironment. This charter is rolled out at several levels within the Group by means of the regions crossed (quality of infrastructure, population density, environmental considerations).

Most of these activities also involve environmental risks related to emissions into the air, water or soil and the production of waste, and also require environmental site remediation and closure and decommissioning after production is discontinued.

The industrial events that can have the most significant impact are primarily a major industrial accident (fire, explosion, leakage of highly toxic products) or large-scale accidental pollution.

All the risks described correspond to events that could potentially cause injury or death, damage property and business activities, cause environmental damage or harm human health. TOTAL employees, contractors, residentsits management systems.

 

46TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

living near the facilities or customers can suffer injuries. Property damage can involve TOTAL’s facilitiesAlong these lines, TOTAL has developed efficient organizations as well as safety, environmental and quality management systems, which it makes every effort to have certified or assessed (e.g., standards such as the propertyInternational Safety Rating System, ISO 14001 and ISO 9001).

In most countries, TOTAL’s operations are subject to laws and regulations concerning environmental protection, health and safety, to which TOTAL ensures compliance(see “—Health, safety and environmental regulations”, below).

Assessment

As part of third parties. The seriousnessits policy, TOTAL assesses risks and impacts in the areas of safety (particularly process safety), the environment and the protection of workers and local residents:

prior to approving new projects, investments, acquisitions and disposals;

periodically during operations (safety studies, environmental impact studies, health impact studies and Technological Risk Prevention Plan - PPRT in France);

prior to releasing new substances on the market (toxicological and ecotoxicological studies and life cycle analyses); and

based on the regulatory requirements of the consequencescountries where these activities are carried out and generally accepted professional practices.

In countries where prior administrative authorization and supervision is required, projects are not undertaken without the authorization of the relevant authorities based on the studies provided to the authorities.

In particular, TOTAL has developed a common methodology for analyzing technological risks that is being gradually applied to all activities carried out by the companies of the Group.

Management

TOTAL develops risk management measures based on risk and impact assessments. These measures involve facility and structure design, the reinforcement of safety devices and remedies of environmental degradations.

In addition to developing organizations and management systems as described above, TOTAL strives to minimize industrial and environmental risks inherent in its operations by conducting thorough inspections and audits, training personnel and raising awareness among all those involved.

In addition, performance indicators (particularly in the areas of HSE) and risk monitoring have been put in place, objectives have been set and action plans have been implemented to achieve these objectives.

Although the emphasis is on preventing risks, TOTAL takes regular steps to prepare for crisis management based on the risk scenarios identified.

In particular, TOTAL has developed emergency plans and procedures to respond to an oil spill or leak. These plans and procedures are specific to each TOTAL affiliate and adapted to its organization, activities and environment and are consistent with the Group’s plan. They are reviewed regularly and tested through exercises.

At the Group level, TOTAL has set up the PARAPOL (Plan to Mobilize Resources Against Pollution) alert scheme to facilitate crisis management and provide assistance without geographical restriction by mobilizing both internal and external resources in the event of pollution of marine, coastal or inland waters. The

PARAPOL procedure is made available to subsidiaries of the Group and its main goal is to facilitate access to internal experts and physical response resources.

Furthermore, the Company and its subsidiaries are currently members of certain oil spill cooperatives that are able to provide expertise, resources and equipment in all geographic areas where the Group has operations, including, in particular, Oil Spill Response Limited and CEDRE (Center for Documentation, Research and Experimentation on Accidental Water Pollution).

Following the blow-out on the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 (in which the Group was not involved), TOTAL created three task forces in order to analyze risks and issue recommendations.

In Exploration & Production, Task Force 1 reviewed the safety aspects of deep offshore drilling operations (well architecture, design of blow-out preventers, training of personnel based on lessons learned from serious accidents that have occurred recently in the industry). Its efforts have led to the implementation of even more stringent controls and audits on drilling operations.

Task Force 2, in coordination with the Global Industry Response Group (GIRG) created by the OGP (International Association of Oil and Gas Producers), is developing deep offshore oil capture systems and planning related containment operations in case of a pollution event in deep waters. Several of these events varies according to the vulnerabilitysystems were positioned in various parts of the people, ecosystemsworld in 2013 and business activities impacted, onone of them was tested by TOTAL in November 2013 during a large-scale exercise in Angola.

Task Force 3 addressed plans to fight accidental spills in order to strengthen the one hand,Group’s ability to respond to major accidental pollution, such as a blow-out or a total loss of containment from an FPSO (Floating Production, Storage and Offloading facility). This initiative has led, in particular, to a sharp increase in the volume of dispersants available within the Group.

The task forces finalized most of their work in 2012 and the number of people inGroup has continued deploying solutions to minimize such risks.

The Group believes that it is impossible to guarantee that the impact area and the location of the ecosystems and business activities in relation to TOTAL’s facilitiescontingencies or to the trajectory of the products after the event, on the other hand.

Moreover, oil and gas exploration and production activities are particularly exposed to risksliabilities related to the physical characteristics of an oil or gas field. These risks include eruptions of crude oil or natural gas, which notably could result from drilling into abnormally pressurized hydrocarbon pockets.

TOTAL conforms to the REACH regulation, which purpose is to protect health and safety of products and chemical substances producers and users notably by providing detailed information through safety data sheets (SDS/ESDS). Like most other industrial groups, TOTAL is concerned by reports of occupational illnesses, in particular those caused by asbestos exposure. Asbestos exposure has been subject to close monitoring at all of the Group’s business units. As of December 31, 2011, the Group estimates that the ultimate cost of all asbestos-related claims paid or pending isabove mentioned concerns will not likely to have a material impact on its business, assets and liabilities, consolidated financial situation, cash flow or income in the Group’s financial situation.future.

TOTAL’s entities actively monitor regulatory developments to comply with local and international rules and standards for the evaluation and management of industrial and environmental risks. In case of operations being stopped, the Group’s environmental contingencies and asset retirement obligations are addressed in “Asset retirement obligation” and “Provisions for environmental contingencies” in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Future expenses related to asset retirement obligations are accounted for in accordance with the principles described in paragraph Q of Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Health, safety and environment regulations

TOTAL is subject to extensive and increasingly strict health, safety and environmental (“HSE”) regulations in the European Union (“EU”), the United States and the rest of the world.

i. European Union:The following is a non-exhaustive list of major HSE regulations and directives that affect TOTAL’s operations and products in the EU:

 

Risk prevention

The Industrial Emissions Directive (“IED”) entered into force on January 6, 2011, and must be transposed

The Seveso III Directive (2012/18/EU), which entered into force in August 2012, updated and replaced the Major Hazards Directive Seveso II of 1996 that required emergency planning, public disclosure of emergency plans, assessment of hazards and emergency management systems. The new Directive strengthened rules on the control of major accident hazards and integrated provisions on EU chemicals law (integration into the Seveso III Directive of the Classification, Labelling and Packaging(CLP) regulation and adapting the EU system to the UN’s international chemicals classification — Globally

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.47


Item 4 - Other Matters

  

into national legislation byHarmonized System, or GHS). This Directive also clarified and updated other provisions, including introducing stricter inspection standards, improving the level and quality of information available to the public in the event of an accident, and public participation in decision-making and access to justice. EU Member States must transpose and implement this Directive by June 2015, which is also the date on which the new UN GHS becomes fully applicable in Europe.

The EU adopted the Safety of offshore oil and gas operations Directive on June 10, 2013. The new regulatory framework aims at reducing the occurrence of major accidents related to offshore oil and gas operations and to limit their consequences by establishing minimum conditions for safe offshore exploration and exploitation and improving the response mechanisms in the event of a major accident. The new Directive sets clear rules that cover the whole lifecycle of all exploration and production activities from design to the final removal of an oil or gas installation. In addition, the Directive also provides rules for transparency and sharing of information, cooperation between EU Member States, emergency response plans and transboundary emergency preparedness and response. EU Member States must transpose and implement this Directive by July 2015.

The regulation REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) came into force in June 2007 and required the pre-registration of chemical substances manufactured or imported into the EU by December 2008, to qualify for full registration under a phase-in during the period 2010-2018. This regulation requires the registration and identification of chemical substances manufactured or imported in EU Member States in a central database in the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki, and can result in restrictions on the sales or uses of such substances. REACH requires TOTAL to evaluate the hazards of its chemicals and products and may result in future changes to warning labels and material safety data sheets. To date, the Group has registered more than 220 substances.

Protection of the natural environment

The Industrial Emissions Directive (“IED”) (2010/75/EU) entered into force in January 7, 2013. This Directive2011 and replaced a number of existing industrial emission directives, including the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive (2008/1/EC — “IPPC”)(IPPC) and numerous sectorial directives as of January 2014, with the exception of the Large Combustion PlantPlants (LCP) Directive (2001/80/EC).of 2001, which will be repealed with effect from January 2016. The IED was required to be transposed by EU Member States into their national legislations by early January 2013. France transposed this Directive into its national legislation in May 2013.

By imposing the reduction of emissions from industrial installations, the IED will progressively result in stricter emission limits on some of TOTAL’s facilities by making compulsory certain rules described in BREFs (Reference documents on Best Available Techniques).

The Air Quality Framework Directive (2008/50/CE) and related directives on ambient air quality assessment and management, among other things, limit emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, carbon monoxide, benzene and ozone.

By imposing the reduction of emissions from industrial installations, the IED will progressively result in stricter emission limits on certain facilities of TOTAL by making compulsory certain rules described in the Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Documents (BREFs). The BREFs and related BAT documents are published by the European Commission (“EC”) after exchanges of information between experts from the EU Member States, industry and environmental organizations to determine BATs. This exchange is coordinated by the European IPPC Bureau of the Institute for Prospective Technology Studies at the European Joint Research Centre in Seville (Spain).

Existing directives controlling and limiting exhaust emissions from cars and other motor vehicles are expected to continue to become more stringent over time. Since 2009, a maximum sulphur content of 10 ppm is mandatory throughout the EU.

The Sulphur Content Directive (1999/32/EC, as amended) limits sulphur in diesel fuel to 0.1% (since January 2008) and limits sulphur in heavy fuel oil to 1% (since January 2003), with certain exceptions for combustion plants provided that local air quality standards are met.

The 1996 Major Hazards Directive (Seveso II) requires emergency planning, public disclosure of emergency plans, assessment of hazards and effective emergency management systems. A revision process is currently pending to strengthen rules on the control of major accident hazards involving chemicals. The revision will align the legislation to changes in EU chemicals law and will clarify and update other provisions, including introducing stricter inspection standards and improving the level and quality of information available to the public in the event of an accident. The new directive is expected to apply from June 1, 2015.

In October 2011, the European Commission proposed a regulation on the safety of offshore oil and gas activities. The regulation introduces rules for the effective prevention of and response to a major accident that would be immediately applicable to new installations and with transitional periods for existing installations.

Numerous directives regulate the classification, labeling and packaging of chemical substances and

  

their preparation, as well as restrictAmong other things, the Air Quality Framework Directive (2008/50/EC) (“AQFD”) and banrelated directives on ambient air quality assessment and management limit emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, carbon monoxide, benzene and ozone. The EC adopted in December 2013 a “Clean Air Package” including a Clean Air Programme for Europe with measures to ensure that existing targets of the use of certain chemical substancesAQFD are met in the short term and products.to introduce new air quality objectives for the period up to 2030, a revised National Emission Ceilings Directive with stricter national emission ceilings for the six main pollutants and a proposal for a new directive to reduce pollution from medium-sized combustion installations.

On the one hand, the EU Parliament and Council adopted a regulation in December 2008 (now in force) on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures that incorporates the classification criteria and labelling rules agreed at the UN level (the so-called Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)).

On the other hand, the EU Member States, the European Commission and the European Chemical Agency are in the process of implementing the regulation adopted in 2006 for the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) that replaces or complements the existing rules in this area. REACH required the pre-registration of chemical substances manufactured and imported into the EU by December 1, 2008, to qualify for full registration under a phase in during the period 2010-2018. This regulation requires the registration and identification of chemical substances manufactured or imported in EU Member States, and can result in restrictions on the sales or uses of such substances. GHS and REACH will require us to evaluate the hazards of our chemicals and products and may result in future changes to warning labels and material safety data sheets.

Certain maritime safety directives implemented in France between 2011 and 2012 require tankers to have double hulls and ship owners to acquire improved insurance coverage, mandate improvements to traffic monitoring, accident investigations and in-port vessel inspection, and further regulate organizations that inspect and confirm conformity to applicable regulations.

 

The Framework Directive on Waste Disposal is intended to ensure that waste is recovered or disposed of without endangering human health and without using processes or methods that could unduly harm the environment. Numerous related directives regulate specific categories of waste. In November 2008, the Framework Directive on Waste Disposal was partially modified by the Directive on Waste 2008/98, which features more precise definitions and stronger provisions. Transposition of this Directive in France occurred with the Ordinance of December 17, 2010.

A number of Maritime Safety Directives were passed in the wake of the Erika and Prestige spills, and implemented in France by Ordinance n° 2011-635 dated June 9, 2011. Those regulations, found in the three Maritime Safety Packages, require that tankers have double hulls and that ship owners acquire improved insurance coverage, mandate improvements to traffic monitoring, accident investigations and in-port vessel inspection (Port State Control: objective of 100% inspection in the EU), and further regulate organizations that inspect and confirm conformity to applicable regulations (Classification Societies). The last package will enter into force in 2012.

Numerous directives impose water quality standards based on the various uses of inland and coastal waters, including ground water, by setting limits on the discharges of many dangerous substances and by imposing information gathering and reporting requirements.

Numerous directives impose water quality standards based on the various uses of inland and coastal waters, including ground water, by setting limits on the discharges of many dangerous substances and by imposing information gathering and reporting requirements.

Adopted and effective since 2000, a comprehensive Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) is progressively replacing numerous existing directives with a comprehensive set of requirements, including additional regulations obligating member countriesEU Member States to classify all water courses according to their biological, chemical and ecological quality, and to completely ban the discharges of approximately thirty toxic substances by 2017.

The law n° 2011-835 was adopted in France in July 2011 to prohibit

Concerning the exploitation of shale gas, the EC launched in 2013 the “Environmental, Climate and Energy Assessment Framework to Enable a Safe and Secure Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction” initiative. This initiative, which is subject to an impact assessment, is intended to provide a framework to manage risks, address regulatory shortcomings and provide maximum legal clarity and predictability concerning the exploration and operation of shale gas to both market operators and citizens across the EU. In January 2014, the EC adopted a (non-binding) Recommendation setting minimum core principles for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons using high-volume hydraulic fracturing, which EU Member States are invited to apply within six months. Discussions are expected to be pursued with competent national authorities in 2014.

See “— Business Overview — Upstream Segment — Exploration & Production — Europe — France” for an overview of TOTAL’s Montélimar exclusive exploration license and operation of shale gas by hydro-fracking technique and to repeal the exclusive research permits for projects using this technique. Consequently, the exclusive research permits issued to TOTAL at Montelimar (in the south of France) were repealed by the French Government. An administrative procedure is currently pending against this repeal.related government revocation.

The EU framework Directive on Waste Disposal, which entered into force in December 2008, ensures that waste is recovered or disposed of without endangering human health and without using processes or methods that could unduly harm the environment. Numerous related EU directives regulate specific categories of waste.

Biodiversity issues are being given increasing regulatory consideration. Following the 2010 Nagoya summit, the UN’s 65th General Assembly decided to form the

48TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

 

In March 2004, the EU adopted a Directive on Environmental Liability (2004/35/EC). The Directive seeks to implement a strict liability approach for damage to water resources, soils and protected species and habitats by authorized industrial activities.

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity (IPBES) in order to share knowledge and future policies on biodiversity and ecosystem services.

 

Directives implementing the Aarhus Convention of June 25, 1998, concerning public information rights and certain public participation rights in a variety of activities affecting the environment were adopted in January and May 2003, respectively. French regulations on public inquiry and impact assessment were adopted in 2011 and will enter into force on June 2012. These regulations aim to reinforce public participation and information rights concerning projects that could affect the environment.

In November 2008, the EU adopted a directive on theClimate protection of the environment through criminal law that obliges EU Member States to provide for criminal penalties in respect of serious infringements of EC law (Directive 2008/99/EC). This directive was transposed in France in January 2012.

With respect to the climate change issue, numerous initiatives in the EU are pending or currently being revised, including:

 

  

AWith respect to the Kyoto protocol, which expired in 2012, the 2011 UN Climate Conference in Durban extended the Kyoto principles beyond 2012 in order to permit negotiations for the possible adoption by 2015 of a new legally-binding international agreement. The latest UN Climate Conference, held in Warsaw in December 2013, established a roadmap to negotiate the 2015 binding universal climate agreement to be signed by the negotiating countries. The next UN Climate Conference will be held in 2014 in Lima and will be followed in 2015 by the 21st Conference in Paris.

With a view towards the possible adoption of the aforementioned international agreement in 2015, certain negotiating countries have initiated or intensified domestic preparation for their national contributions towards such agreement.

The ETS (Emission Trading Scheme) Directive (2003/87/CE), as amended, was adopted in 2003 Directive implementingin the framework of the Kyoto Protocol within the EU established an emissions trading

in order to establish a scheme effective as of January 2005 for greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions quotas. Onemission allowance trading within the basisEU with the goal of this directive, carbon dioxide emissions permits are then delivered.significantly reducing GHG emissions. This trading scheme required EU Member States to prepare under the supervision of the EU Commission, national allocation plans identifying a global amount ofCO2 quotas to be shared and delivered for free by the governments to each industrial installation for specific sectors, in particular the energy intensive installations that have to surrender quotas with respect to their annually verified carbon dioxide emissions.sectors. In accordance with the 2009 revision of the aforementioned directive,Directive, a progressive quota auctioning mechanism is scheduledin place for the period 2013-2020 (referred to be set up in 2013 together with transitional Community-wide rules for harmonized free allocation up to a level based on benchmarks for sectors exposed to international carbon leakage. These changesas the “3rd phase”). Since the quantity of freely-allocated allowances will end the free allocations for electricity production and have an expanded scope covering additional commercial sectors and emissions. When this system is established,gradually decrease until 2020, TOTAL’s industrial facilities may incur capital and operating costs to comply with such legislation, including the partial acquisition of emissions allowances.

  

The first period of the Kyoto Protocol is reaching an end in 2012. The Cancun UN conference at the end of 2010 reaffirmed the principles of Kyoto, but did not result in the adoption of any new legally binding agreement with respect to the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol. The Durban conference of November 2011 resulted in the Kyoto principles being extended post-2012 to permit the possible adoption by 2015 of another legally-binding international agreement to be signed by the negotiating countries as well as by the United States together with China, India and certain other developing nations.

The Climate“Climate Action and Renewable Energy PackagePackage” imposes an EU objective referred to as “3 x 20”, which commits EU Member States by 2020 to reduce overall GHG emissions to at least 20% below 1990 levels, to improve energy efficiency by 20% and to increase renewable energy usage by 20%. In 2011, compared to the European Commission published its “Roadmapprojections for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050” to look beyond these 2020 objectives and to set out a plan to meet the long-term target of reducing domestic emissions by 80 to 95% by mid-century. The sectors most responsible for emissions in the

EU (i.e., power generation, industry, transport, buildings and construction, as well as agriculture) are charged with making the transition to a low-carbon economy over the coming decades and these issues could affect TOTAL’s operations in the future.2020.

In 2011, the EC published a “Roadmap for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050” to look beyond these 2020 objectives and to set out a plan to meet the long-term target of reducing domestic emissions by 80% to 95% by mid-century.

In 2013, the EC published a Green Paper entitled “A 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Policies” to propose to review European climate objectives for 2030. In January 2014, the EC proposed a new EU framework on climate and energy for 2030, including a target to reduce EU domestic GHG emissions by 40% by 2030, which is expected to be further debated in particular in the European Council and European Parliament.

The sectors most responsible for emissions in the EU (i.e., power generation, industry, transport, buildings and construction, as well as agriculture) are charged with making the transition to a low-carbon economy over the coming decades, and these issues could affect TOTAL’s operations in the future.

  

The 2009 Directive on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) was transposed in France in 2010. This legal framework(2009/31/EC) (“CCS Directive”) forms the basis for developing CCS projects that are expected to serve as one of the most valuablehelp provide solutions for the reduction of carbon dioxideCO2 emissions. Such regulations will have technical and financial impacts, including on TOTAL’s projects.The EC issued four guidance documents in 2011 to support coherent implementation of the CCS Directive with respect to the geological storage of CO2 across EU Member States.

With respect

CO2 emission allowances

The regulations concerning the market for CO2 emission allowances in Europe, EU-ETS (European Union Emissions Trading System), entered a third phase on January 1, 2013. This phase marks the end of the overall free allocation of emission allowances: certain emissions, such as those related to electricity production, no longer benefit from free allowances, while for others, free allowances have been significantly reduced. Free allocations are now established based on the emission level of the top-performing plants within the same sector (“top 10 benchmark”) and lower-performing plants must purchase, at market price, the necessary allowances to cover their emissions over and above these free allocations. Moreover, the Group’s plants will need to indirectly bear the cost of allowances for all electricity consumed (including electricity generated internally at its own facilities).

Given these new rules and the European Commission’s decision to biodiversity issues,apply a “cross-sectoral correction factor” (CSCF) that reduces the total amount of free allocations for all sectors combined by an average of 11.6% over phase 3 (2013-2020), the Group estimates that approximately 30% of its emissions subject to the EU-ETS will not be covered by free allowances during the 2013-2020 period. The Group is exploring possible avenues of appeal against the method of calculating this subject is increasingly taken into consideration. Followingcorrection factor.

The financial risk related to the 2010 Nagoya summit,foreseeable purchase of these allowances on the UN’s 65th General Assembly decidedmarket should remain low for the Group if prices for emission allowances remain close to formtheir current level (5/t CO2). If significant changes are made to the IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity)regulation during phase 3, such as the authorization given to share knowledge and future policies on biodiversity and ecosystem services. The next UN Conference on Sustainable Development (“Rio +20”) is expectedthe European Commission to be held in Rio in June 2012 and will focus on two themes: a green economyintervene at its own discretion in the contextallowance auction calendar (backloading), prices for CO2 allowances could increase substantially, which could have a significant adverse impact on the results of sustainable developmentthe Group’s refining operations. Finally, the revision in 2014 of the list of sectors exposed to carbon leakage represents another regulatory uncertainty that, if it were to affect the refining sector in Europe, could also have a significant adverse impact on the results of the Group’s refining operations.

Environmental liability

The Directive on Environmental Liability (2004/35/EC) (“ELD”) seeks to implement a strict liability approach for damage to water resources, soils and protected species and habitats by authorized industrial activities. The ELD, which came into force in 2004, has since been amended several times in order to broaden the scope of strict liability by adding the “management of extractive waste” and the “operation of storage sites pursuant to Directive 2009/31/EC” to the list of dangerous occupational activities in Annex III of the ELD, and to extend the scope of “damage to marine waters”.

EU Member States reported to the EC in 2013 their experiences concerning the application of the amended ELD. Based on these reports, the EC will submit a report

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.49


Item 4 - Other Matters

reviewing the amended ELD to the European Parliament and poverty eradication, andto the institutional framework for sustainable development.European Council by April 30, 2014, which may result in changes to the amended ELD.

Directive 2008/99/EC, which concerns the protection of the environment through criminal law, obliges EU Member States to provide for criminal penalties in respect of serious infringements of EC regulations. In France, such obligation was transposed in July 2013.

Public information

EU directives implementing the Aarhus International Convention of 1998 were adopted in 2003 and provide public information and participation rights in a variety of activities affecting the environment. French regulations on public inquiry and impact assessment were adopted in 2011 and entered into force in June 2012. These regulations reinforce public participation and information rights concerning projects that could affect the environment. In December 2012, September 2013 and December 2013, French regulations were published on public participation modalities in public decision-making processes on projects affecting the environment.

A proposed amendment of Directive 2011/92/EU on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive was submitted to the European Parliament and Council by the EU Commission in October 2012 and the European Parliament adopted amendments in October 2013 to this proposal. As a result, this Directive is expected to be reviewed in 2014 and may result in the strengthening of provisions concerning the quality of environmental impact assessments.

ii. United States:In the United States, where TOTAL’s operations are less extensive than in Europe, TOTAL is also subject to significant HSE regulations at both the state and federal levels. Of particular relevance to TOTAL’s lines of business are:

 

The Clean Air Act and its regulations, which require, among other measures: stricter phased-in fuel specifications and sulfur reductions; enhanced emissions controls and monitoring at major sourcesProtection of volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and other designated hazardous and non-hazardous air pollutants; GHG regulation; stringent pollutant emission limits; construction and operating permits for major air emission sources at chemical plants, refineries, marine and distribution terminals and other facilities; and risk management plans for the handling and storage of hazardous substances.natural environment

The Clean Water Act, which regulates the discharge of wastewater and other pollutants from both onshore and offshore operations and, among other measures, requires industrial facilities to obtain permits for most wastewater and surface water discharges, install control equipment and treatment systems, implement operational controls, and preventative measures, including spill prevention and control plans and practices to control storm water runoff.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which regulates the generation, storage, handling, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous waste and imposes corrective action requirements on regulated facilities requiring investigation and remediation of potentially contaminated areas at these facilities.

The Clean Air Act and its regulations, which require, among other measures: stricter phased-in fuel specifications and sulfur reductions; enhanced emissions controls and monitoring at major sources of volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and other designated hazardous and non-hazardous air pollutants; GHG regulation; stringent pollutant emission limits; construction and operating permits for major air emission sources at chemical plants, refineries, marine and distribution terminals and other facilities; and risk management plans for the handling and storage of hazardous substances.

The Clean Water Act, which regulates the discharge of wastewater and other pollutants from both onshore and offshore operations and, among other measures, requires industrial facilities to obtain permits for most wastewater and surface water discharges, install control equipment and treatment systems, implement operational controls, and preventative measures, including spill prevention and control plans and practices to control storm water runoff.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which regulates the generation, storage, handling, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous waste and imposes corrective action requirements on regulated facilities requiring investigation and remediation of potentially contaminated areas at these facilities.

Environmental liability

 

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (also known as CERCLA orSuperfund), under which waste generators, former andcurrent site owners and operators, and certain other parties can be held jointly and severally liable for the entire cost of remediating active, abandoned or non-operating sites contaminated by releases of hazardous substances regardless of fault or the amount or share of hazardous substances sent by a party to a site. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has authority under Superfund to order responsible parties to clean up contaminated sites and may seek recovery of the government’s response costs from responsible parties. States have similar legal authority to compel site investigations and cleanups and to recover costs from responsible parties. The U.S. government and states may also sue responsible parties under CERCLA for damage to natural resources (e.g., rivers and wetlands) arising from contamination.releases of hazardous substances.

Risk prevention

National and international maritime oil spill laws, regulations and conventions, including the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, impose significant oil spill prevention requirements, spill response planning and training obligations, ship design requirements (including phased in double hull requirements for tankers), operational restrictions, spill liability for tankers and barges transporting oil, offshore oil platform facilities and onshore terminals and establishes an oil liability spill fund paid for by taxes on imported and domestic oil.

In the wake of the Deepwater Horizon accident, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement was replaced by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which is responsible for managing development of offshore resources, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”), which is responsible for safety and environmental oversight of offshore oil and gas operations. The BSEE has implemented more stringent permitting requirements and oversight of offshore drilling. Among other changes, well design, casing and cementing standards have been upgraded and compliance must be certified by a professional engineer. In addition, plans must describe containment resources available in case of an underwater blowout

  

National and international maritime oil spill laws, regulations and conventions, including the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) and certain coastal state laws impose significant operational, compliance and liability regimes. OPA 90 imposes significant oil spill prevention requirements, spill response planning and training obligations, ship design requirements (including phased in double hull requirements for tankers), operational restrictions, spill liability for tankers and barges transporting oil, offshore oil platform facilities and onshore terminals and establishes an oil liability spill fund paid for by taxes on imported and domestic oil.

Offshore oil and gas operations are regulated by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which is responsible for managing development of offshore resources, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”), which is responsible for safety and environmental oversight of offshore oil and gas operations. The BSEE has implemented more stringent permitting requirements and oversight of offshore drilling. Among other changes, well design, casing and cementing standards have been upgraded and compliance must be certified by a professional engineer. In addition, plans must describe containment resources available in case of an underwater blowout and worst case discharge, and operators in the Gulf of Mexico are required to develop and implement a Safety and Environmental Management Systems program.

Other significant U.S. environmental legislation includes the Toxic Substances Control Act, which regulates the development, testing, import, export and introduction of new chemical products into commerce, and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, which requires emergency planning and spill notification as well as public disclosure of chemical usage and emissions.

Other significant U.S. environmental legislation includes the Toxic Substances Control Act, which regulates the development, testing, import, export and introduction of new chemical products into commerce, and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, which requires emergency planning and spill notification as well as public disclosure of chemical usage and emissions. The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA) regulates material designations, packaging requirements, and operation rules and procedures for the transport of hazardous materials within the United States.

TOTAL’s facilities in the United States are also subject to extensive workplace safety regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”). Most notable among OSHA regulations is the Process

50TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals standard, a comprehensive regulatory program thatrequires major industrial sources, including petroleum refineries and chemical manufacturing facilities, to undertake significant hazard assessments during thedesign of new industrial processes and modifications to existing processes, as well as a comprehensive and continual monitoring and management process for these chemicals.

Climate protection

EPA regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from industrial sources under the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V operating permit programs formally commenced in early January 2011. With the new EPA rules affecting a variety of emission sources and activities, TOTAL’s U.S. subsidiaries may be required, among other things, to obtain GHG permits to construct new facilities or to modify existing facilities. As a result, TOTAL’s U.S. subsidiaries could incur additional capital and operating costs to comply with control technology and/or facility upgrade requirements to reduce GHG emissions.

Unconventional gas production

TOTAL has investments in the United States in unconventional gas plays that utilize hydraulic fracturing, or

“fracking,” a process that involves pumping a mixture of water, sand and chemicals underground at high pressure to fracture rock formations and release natural gas andliquids that are otherwise inaccessible. Currently, regulation of these practices occurs at the state level, although there are a number of federal legislative agency proposals that could alter the regulatory framework. In April 2012, the EPA issued final rules that established new air emission controls for oil and natural gas production and natural gas processing operations, which include new emissions standards for a variety of oil and natural gas production and processing activities. In addition, various state initiatives could result in stricter regulation of fracking. Increased regulation could affect TOTAL’s operating costs, profitability and future investments in these unconventional gas plays.

Legal proceedings

Proceedings instituted by governmental authorities are pending or known to be contemplated against certain U.S.-based subsidiaries of TOTAL under applicable environmental laws that could result in monetary sanctions in excess of $100,000. No individual proceeding is, nor are the proceedings as a whole, expected to have a material adverse effect on TOTAL’s consolidated financial position or profitability.

Health Safety Environment Quality Charter

TOTAL’s safety, health and environment policy is based on the charter below, which was adopted in 2000 and updated in 2009. This charter represents the common framework of the Group’s HSE and Quality management systems. Group directives define the minimum requirements expected in the different HSE areas and are implemented in the business segments, which subsequently factor in the specific characteristics of their operations. Recommendations, guides and manuals are regularly published and made available to the different business segments. They provide invaluable guidance and support for implementing and managing the Group’s policies.

Safety Health Environment Quality Charter

TOTAL has based its policy in matters pertaining to health, safety, the environment and quality on the following ten principles:

Article 1: TOTAL considers personal health and safety, operational safety, respect for the environment, customer satisfaction and listening to stakeholders as paramount priorities.

Article 2: TOTAL strives to comply with applicable laws and regulations wherever it conducts its business and supplements them, when appropriate, with its own specific requirements.

Article 3: TOTAL promotes among its employees a shared culture the core components of which are skills management, incident feedback, information and dialogue. This process is driven by the leadership and exemplary conduct of management.

Article 4: TOTAL favors the selection of its industrial and business partners on the basis of their ability to comply with its health, safety, environment and quality policy.

Article 5: TOTAL implements, for all its operations, appropriate management policies regarding health, safety, environment and quality risks which are regularly assessed. No project development or product launch may be undertaken without a risk assessment covering the entire life of the project or product.

Article 6: Appropriate health, safety, environment and quality management systems for each line of business undergo regular assessment involving measuring the performance, setting milestones, formulating relevant action plans and instituting suitable control procedures.

Article 7: In order to respond effectively in the event of accidents, TOTAL equips itself appropriately and establishes emergency procedures that are periodically reviewed and regularly tested during exercises.

Article 8: All employees, at all levels, must be aware of their role and personal responsibility in performing their duties, giving due consideration to the prevention of risks of accidents, harm to health, environmental damage or adverse impacts on product and service quality. Vigilance and professionalism in these fields are important criteria in evaluating the performance of each member of personnel, in particular for those in positions of responsibility.

Article 9: In matters of health, safety, environment and quality, TOTAL adopts a constructive attitude based on open dialogue with stakeholders and outside parties. Through its social commitment, it focuses on developing its business in harmony with the neighboring communities.

Article 10: TOTAL monitors and controls the Group’s energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, production of ultimate waste and impact on biodiversity. The Group develops new processes, products and customer services in order to enhance energy efficiency and reduce environmental footprints. The Group is engaged in research and development for additional energy resources. TOTAL thus actively contributes to Sustainable Development.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.51


Item 4 - Other Matters

The Industrial Safety department and the Sustainable Development and Environment department, together with the Security department, report to Corporate Affairs and provide support to the segments and ensure that they implement policies that reflect the principles of the charter in a concrete, effective manner.

In accordance with oil and gas industry best practices (set out in the IPIECA reporting guidance), the following health, safety and environment information relates to the activities, sites and industrial assets that TOTAL operates or for which it has been given contractual responsibility for managing operations, directly or through one of its subsidiaries. An exception is made for information concerning greenhouse gases, which is also expressed as a Group share of all assets in which TOTAL has a stake. The data presented in this section are provided on a current basis. For instance, data relating to SunPower, in which the Group holds a 64.65% interest, were taken into account from 2012.

Occupational health and safety

For many years now, the Group has been developing an HSE normative framework. In this respect, directives have been drawn up for occupational health and safety. These directives set out TOTAL’s requirements in these areas for personnel working on its sites. In 2013, the three business segments increased their efforts in terms of the reference frameworks of the HSE management systems in order to provide greater overall consistency, while at the same time respecting the businesses’ specific characteristics.

Indicators are used to measure the main results in these areas and monthly reporting of occupational incidents is used to monitor performance at both the global and site level. The Group does not differentiate between the safety of its employees and that of external contractors. The indicators below include incidents and hours worked by Group Employees and contractors working on its sites.

   2013  2012  2011 

LTIR(a): number of lost time incidents per million hours worked

  0.9    1.0    1.3  

TRIR(b): number of recorded incidents per million hours worked

  1.6    1.8    2.2  

SIR(c): average number of days lost per lost time incident

  32.0    27.2    23.9  

(a)

LTIR: Lost Time Injury Rate.

(b)

TRIR: Total Recordable Injury Rate.

(c)

SIR: Severity Injury Rate.

The severity injury rate increased in 2013 compared with the previous year. This was particularly apparent in the Upstream segment, where a single event led to the death of four people (see below) and an extended absence from work for fourteen other employees, and in Marketing & Services, where the inclusion in reporting for France of work carried out at service stations had a significant impact on the increase in the segment’s severity rate. In Refining & Chemicals, however, this indicator decreased slightly. The impact on the severity injury rate of the increase in the activities of Exploration & Production and security-related accidents, especially in Marketing & Services, is also being closely monitored.

In 2013, the Group experienced eleven accidents that led to fifteen fatalities, including a tragic helicopter accident that resulted in the death of four contractors. This accident occurred in late August in the North Sea, off the coast of the Shetland Islands, when eighteen people were being carried from an offshore drilling rig by helicopter. An investigation is being conducted by the competent British authorities (AAIB).

The number of fatalities per million hours worked (Fatality Incident Rate) calculated over a 3-year rolling basis, however, shows a downward trend: 0.030 in 2011; 0.025 in 2012; and 0.021 in 2013.

Since 2010, the basic rules to be scrupulously followed by all personnel, employees and contractors alike, in all of the Group’s lines of business worldwide, have been set out in a safety document entitled “Safety at work: TOTAL’s golden rules”. According to the Group’s internal statistics, in more than 90% of severe incidents or near misses with high severity potential in the workplace, at least one of the golden rules had not been followed. The roll-out of the golden rules was accompanied by an awareness campaign in 2011 and 2012 to ensure that all employees know and understand these rules. The proper application of these golden rules, and more generally of all occupational safety procedures, is verified through site visits and audits. Regular presentations and seminars are also organized with the employee representatives on the European Works Council to promote the golden rules.

In 2013, a worldwide safety campaign was launched in connection with the World Day for Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)at Work on the theme of commitment to safety: “TOTAL commitment for me, for you, for all”. Most notable among OSHAThis campaign, launched in eighteen languages, is expected to continue for several more years.

Moreover, the reporting of anomalies and near misses is strongly encouraged and monitored. The ability of each employee to identify anomalies or dangerous situations is a measure of the personnel’s involvement and vigilance in accident prevention, which also reflects the safety culture level. An investigation is generally launched in response to any type of accident whatsoever. The method and depth of investigation depend on the actual or potential severity level. For example, a near miss with a high severity potential level is treated in the same way as a severe incident: its analysis is considered to be a key driving force for progress and, depending on its relevance to the other business units or business segments within the Group, triggers a safety alert and even the dissemination of a feedback report.

The Group’s directives are equally demanding with regard to employee health. In particular, the Group’s companies are expected to prepare a formal occupational risk assessment (chemical, physical, biological, ergonomic or psychosocial), create a risk management action plan and ensure medical monitoring of staff in line with the risks to which they are exposed. Two main indicators are monitored yearly:

   2013  2012  2011 

Percentage of companies included in the Worldwide Human Resources Survey offering employees regular medical monitoring

  95%    98%    96%  

Number of occupational illnesses recorded in the year (in accordance with local regulations) per million hours worked

  0.68    0.86    0.87  

In 2013, there was an 18% decrease in recorded illnesses compared to 2012 with respect to the main occupational illnesses identified at TOTAL:

Musculoskeletal disorders, the main cause of occupational illness, representing 42% of all recorded illnesses. This figure decreased by 12% compared with 2012 due to the implementation of a specific action plan to control risk and improve working conditions, particularly in Hutchinson’s operations;

52TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

Illnesses related to asbestos exposure, which decreased by 33% compared with 2012, in line with the continuous decline over several years due to the absence of recent exposure;

Illnesses related to noise exposure.

In support of the Group’s policy on preventing occupational illnesses and to complement the periodic medical surveillance scheme currently in place, TOTAL set up an employee health observatory, which is responsible for keeping track of any medical conditions potentially affecting employees and, if applicable, suggesting and overseeing the appropriate preventive actions. By the end of 2013, thirteen of the Group’s sites in Europe had signed up for the observatory, which monitors approximately 10% of the Group’s employees.

At the same time, eight French sites give their employees a questionnaire to complete when they have periodic medical check-ups, which are used to measure the impact of the reaction to the stress factors to which they may be exposed.

On a broader level, TOTAL is associated with promoting individual and collective health in the countries where it operates (including flu vaccination campaigns and prevention and screening programs for certain diseases, such as AIDS, cancer and malaria, for employees, their families and local communities). Awareness campaigns relating to lifestyle risks in particular have also been in place for several years (including, for example, anti-smoking and anti-drinking campaigns, musculoskeletal disorder prevention programs).

Environmental protection

General policy

The main Group entities have Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) departments or units that ensure compliance with both relevant local regulations and internal requirements. In all, over 980 full-time equivalent positions dedicated to environmental matters were identified within the Group in 2013.

The Group steering bodies, led by the Sustainable Development and Environment department, have a threefold task:

monitoring TOTAL’s environmental performances, which are reviewed annually by the Management Committee and presented before the Executive Committee, for which multi-annual improvement targets are set;

in conjunction with the business segments, handling the various environment-related areas under their responsibility; and

promoting the internal standards to be applied by the Group’s business units as set out in the charter.

New objectives were set in the beginning of 2013 for the period up to 2017.

In-house, TOTAL also promotes compliance of its environmental management systems with ISO 14001. In 2013, 314 sites operated by the Group were ISO 14001-certified (compared to 305 in 2012), out of a total of 858 operated sites. The objective for 2017 is to achieve certification for all production sites producing over 10 kt of CO2 eq emissions per year. The policy of allowing new or recently acquired sites two years to achieve certification will continue to apply. At year-end 2013, 100% of the Process Safety Managementeighty-four sites meeting these conditions were ISO 14001 certified and one site that started up less than two years ago has scheduled its certification for 2014.

The environmental risks and impacts of Highly Hazardousany planned investment, disposal or acquisition subject to Executive Committee approval are assessed and reviewed before the final decision is made.

TOTAL ensures that all employees are aware of its environmental protection requirements. Employees are given training in the required skills. TOTAL also raises employee awareness through internal campaigns (e.g., in-house magazines, intranet, posters) and provides annual information about the Group’s environmental performance through circulation of the CSR report.

Two 3-day training courses on all aspects of HSE are also made available to the business units. “HSE Implementation” sessions are aimed at employees whose job is specifically to handle one or more HSE areas within a business unit (three sessions were held in 2013 with seventy-eight participants). The training session “HSE for Managers” is aimed at senior managers who are currently or will in the future be responsible for one of the Group’s business units (five sessions were held in 2013 with 221 participants). Lastly, the “HSE for Executives” course focusing on management styles has been organized since 2012 for Group executives (five sessions were held in 2013 with 99 participants).

Environmental footprint

TOTAL implements an active policy of monitoring, managing and reducing the environmental footprint of its operations. As part of this policy, emissions are identified and quantified by environment (water, air and soil) so that appropriate measures can be taken to better control them.

i. Water, air:The Group’s operations generate chronic emissions, such as fumes at combustion plants, emissions into the atmosphere from the various conversion processes and discharges into wastewater. In addition to complying with applicable legislation, the Group’s companies actively pursue a policy aimed at reducing the amount of emissions. Sites use various treatment systems that include different types of measures:

Organizational measures (e.g., using predictive models for controlling peaks in SO2 emissions in accordance with weather forecast data, managing combustion processes).

Technical measures (such as building wastewater treatment plants).

These measures can be preventive to avoid generating pollutants (such aslow-NOx burners for combustion plants) or curative (such as biological treatment of processed water to reduce the hydrocarbon content of the final effluent).

To ensure the quality of its wastewater discharge, TOTAL has set, for all of its offshore exploration and production operations, a target of complying with the hydrocarbon concentration requirements set out in the OSPAR standard (less than 30 mg/l), which is only mandatory in the North Sea. For the fifth consecutive applicable year, the Group achieved this goal on yearly average in 2013.

In 2013, the Normandy platform (petrochemical plant) hosted E4WATER, a European research project aimed at developing tomorrow’s technologies that would permit recycling water based on a petrochemical pollution matrix. This involves testing seven pilot processes (sand filtration, ozonation for cooling, UV disinfection treatment, ozonation for waste water, bio-filtration, ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis) on two aqueous flows in the site: waste water and cooling water. These technologies are mature, but their combination on a petrochemical matrix is innovative. On completion of this project in 2015, the knowledge acquired will be used locally for a recycling project (40% reduction in withdrawal) or globally (recycling program for Exploration & Production and Refining & Chemicals a comprehensive regulatory programsegments). This project aims both to decrease the discharge of hazardous substances into the natural environment and to save natural resources by recycling water in the processes used by the Group.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.53


Item 4 - Other Matters

The table below shows changes in chronic emissions into the atmosphere (excluding greenhouse gas; see“— Climate change”, below) and discharged water quality:

    2013   2012   2011 

SO2 emissions (thousands of metric tons)

   75     79     91  

NOx emissions (thousands of metric tons)

   91     88     84  

Hydrocarbons in discharged water (metric tons, onshore and coastal, excluding Specialty Chemicals)

   306     437     380  

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) in water discharged by specialty chemicals (metric tons)

   270     275     320  

The presentation of hydrocarbon discharges in effluents was changed in 2013 to obtain an indicator consistent with the target set by the Group (40% reduction in onshore and coastal hydrocarbon discharges between 2011 and 2017). In order to compare 2013 performance with that requires major industrial sources, including petroleumof previous years, the concentration of hydrocarbons in water discharged by Exploration & Production was 17 mg/l in 2013 compared to 23 mg/l in 2012 and 20 mg/l in 2011.

The slight decrease in SO2 emissions between 2012 and 2013 was driven by the shutdown of the catalytic crackers at two refineries and chemical manufacturing facilities,the proper operational performance of the sulfur units at other refineries. In addition, the vast majority of the fuels used at the Group’s refineries are now gaseous, which have a much lower sulfur content than liquid fuels.

In 2013, NOx emissions produced by Exploration & Production increased by 5 kt due to undertake significant hazard assessments during the designincrease in drilling activities, and therefore of new industrial processesdiesel consumption, and modifications to existing processes, as well as a comprehensive and continual monitoring and management process for these chemicals.

The EPA’s regulation of GHG emissions from industrial sources under the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V operating permit programs formally commenced on January 2, 2011. The authority to regulate GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act is the culmination of several EPA rulemakings promulgated in 2009 and 2010decreased by 1.5 kt as a result of the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decisionsale of the Fertilizers business.

The amount of hydrocarbons discharged at the coasts and onshore has declined sharply due to the improved performance of oil terminals inMassachusetts v. EPAconfirming the authorityGulf of EPAGuinea, with the inflow of investments and with the operational management between offshore facilities and terminals.

Below are the Group’s achievements at year-end 2013 based on the objectives set at the beginning of 2013:

19% reduction in hydrocarbon discharges in water (onshore and coastal) since 2011 compared to the 40% target set for 2017;

24% reduction in SO2 emissions compared to 2010, that is, exceeding the target set for 2017 (-20%).

ii. Soil:The risks of soil pollution related to regulate GHG emissions underTOTAL’s operations come mainly from accidental spills and waste storage (see below). The Group’s approach to preventing and controlling these types of pollution is based on four cornerstones:

leak prevention, by implementing industry best practices in engineering, operations and transport;

maintenance at appropriate intervals to minimize the risk of leaks;

overall monitoring of the environment to identify any increase in soil pollution; and

controlling pollution from previous activities by means of containment or reduction operations.

Decommissioned Group facilities (e.g., chemical plants, service stations, mud pits or lagoons resulting from hydrocarbon extraction operations, wasteland on the Clean Air Act. Eachsite of these rulemakingsdecommissioned refinery units) impact the landscape and may, despite all of the precautions taken, be sources of chronic or accidental pollution.

TOTAL ensures that sites are remediated when it leaves in order to allow new operations to be set up once the future use of the land has been determined in agreement with the authorities. This continuous task is under legal challenge. The EPA may issue future regulations requiring additional industry sectors to report GHG emissionsperformed by various teams within the Group, some of which form subsidiaries, and has indicated its intention to phasebeen governed by a “Polluted soil and site reclamation” policy since 2012.

iii. Waste:The Group’s companies are focused on controlling the waste produced at every stage in GHG permitting for smaller industrial sources. Various state and regional requirements also govern GHG emissions and additional measures can be expectedtheir operations. This commitment is based on the following four principles, listed in the future. Depending upon the outcomedecreasing order of legal challenges and the content of future GHG regulations, TOTAL subsidiaries in the United States may incur additional capital and operating costs to comply with control technology and/or facility upgrade requirements for reducing GHG emissions.priority:

1.reducing waste at source, by designing products and processes that generate as little waste as possible, as well as minimizing the quantity of waste produced by the Group’s operations;
2.reusing products for a similar purpose in order to prevent them from becoming waste;
3.recycling residual waste; and
4.recovering energy, wherever possible, from non-recycled products.

To this end, TOTAL has investmentsentered into a variety of partnerships:

With Veolia, the Group is involved in the Osilub project, which culminated in the construction of a used motor oil recycling plant in Le Havre, France. The plant, of which TOTAL holds a 35% share, entered into production in 2012 and boasts a processing capacity of 120,000 t/y (50% of all the used motor oil collected in France); the recycled oil is used to make vacuum gas oil (VGO) for refinery production of lubricants and fuels.

In 2011, Total Energy Ventures (the Group’s vehicle for investing mainly in new energy and environmental protection technologies) acquired a stake in Agilyx. This American startup has developed an innovative process to convert waste plastic into crude oil, for which it already has a unit in production.

A Group directive issued in the United States in unconventional gas plays that utilize hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” a process that involves pumping a mixture of water, sand and chemicals underground at high pressure to fracture rock formations and release natural gas and

liquids that are otherwise inaccessible. Currently, regulation of these practices occurs at the state level, although there are a number of federal legislative proposals that could alter the regulatory framework. In addition, various state initiatives could result in stricter regulation of fracking. Increased regulation could affect TOTAL’s operating costs, profitability and future investments in these unconventional gas plays.

Proceedings instituted by governmental authorities are pending or known to be contemplated against certain U.S.-based subsidiaries of TOTAL under applicable environmental laws that could result in monetary sanctions in excess of $100,000. No individual proceeding is, nor are the proceedings as a whole, expected to have a material adverse effect on TOTAL’s consolidated financial position or profitability.

Management and monitoring of industrial and environmental risks

TOTAL policies regarding health, safety and the environment

TOTAL has developed a “Health Safety Environment Quality Charter” which2012 sets out the minimum requirements related to waste management. It is carried out in four basic principles applicable withinstages:

waste identification (technical and regulatory);

waste storage (soil protection and discharge management);

waste traceability, from production through to disposal (e.g., notes, logs, statements); and

waste processing, with technical and regulatory knowledge of the relevant channels, under site responsibility.

TOTAL is especially committed to managing and treating waste classified as hazardous (depending on the Group regarding the protection of people, property and the environment. This chartertype, waste is rolled out at several levels withinmainly processed outside the Group by means of management systems.specialized companies):

Along these lines,

    2013   2012   2011 

Volume of hazardous waste treated outside the Group (kt)

   232     237     248  

Since 2012, TOTAL has developed efficient organizations as well as safety, environmental and quality management systems, which it makes every effort to have certified or assessed (standards such asalso been monitoring the International Safety Rating System, ISO 14001 and ISO 9001). For example, in 2010, TOTAL received ISO 9001 certificationdifferent waste treatment technologies used for “development and management of the database of technical businesses” in exploration and production.following categories:

Assessment

    2013  2012(a) 

Recycling

   37  38

Waste-to-energy recovery

   7  9

Incineration

   12  12

Landfill

   23  20

As part of its policy, TOTAL systematically assesses risks and impacts in the areas of industrial safety (particularly technological risks), the environment and the protection of workers and local residents:

(a)

The values for 2012 have been corrected given that a large volume of wastewater discharge should not have been recorded as waste at the Exploration & Production subsidiary in Yemen.

54TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

 

prioriv. Environmental nuisance:TOTAL’s operations may cause environmental nuisances for residents near its industrial sites. These may be sound or odor nuisances, but can also result from vibrations or road, sea or river traffic.

Most sites have a system for receiving and handling residents’ complaints, the aim of which is to approving new projects, investments, acquisitionstake account of and disposals;gain a clearer insight into the different types of nuisances and to minimize them. Monitoring systems can also be put in place, such as sound level measurements at the site perimeter or networks of sensors to determine the origin and intensity of odors.

 

periodically during operations (safety studies, environmental impact studies, health impact studies and

Incident risk prevention plan in France as part of the 2003 legislation on the prevention of major technological risks);

prior to introducing new substances to the market (toxicological and ecotoxicological studies and life cycle analyses); and

based on the regulatory requirements of the countries where these activities are carried out and generally accepted standards.

In countries where prior administrative authorization and supervision is required, projects are not undertaken without the authorization of the relevant authorities and are developed according to the studies provided to the authorities.

In particular, TOTAL has developed common methodologies for analyzing technological risks which must gradually be applied to all activities carried out by the Group’s companies.

Management

TOTAL develops risk management measures based on risk and impact assessments. These measures involve facility and structure design, the reinforcement of safety devices and remedies of environmental degradations.

In addition to developing organizationssetting up management structures and management systems, as described above, TOTAL strives to minimize the industrial risks and the environmental risks inherent inimpacts associated with its operations by conducting thoroughby:

performing rigorous inspections and audits;

training staff and raising the awareness of all parties involved; and

implementing an active investment policy.

In particular, TOTAL strives to prevent accidental spills. A common technological risk management approach has been developed to formalize this requirement at the Group’s industrial sites. The methodology is gradually being implemented in all operated businesses exposed to technological risks and audits, training personnelsets out a risk analysis based on incident scenarios for which the severity of the consequences and raising awareness among all those involved, and implementingthe probability of occurrence are assessed. These parameters are used to create a decision matrix that identifies the required level of mitigation.

Specifically with regard to shipping, the Group has an active investment policy.

In addition, performance indicators (ininternal policy setting out the areas of HSE) and risk monitoring have been put in place, objectives have been set and action plans have been implemented to achieve these objectives.

Although the emphasis is on preventing risks, TOTAL takes regular steps to preparerules for crisis managementselecting vessels. These rules are based on the recommendations of the Oil Company International Marine Forum (OCIMF), an industry association made up of the main global oil companies that promotes best practices in oil shipping, and on OCIMF’s Ship Inspection Report (SIRE) Program. TOTAL does not charter any single-hulled vessels for shipping hydrocarbons and the average age of the fleet chartered by TOTAL’s Shipping division is about five years.

In accordance with industry best practices, TOTAL particularly monitors accidental liquid hydrocarbon spills of a volume of more than one barrel. Spills that exceed a certain severity threshold (whether in terms of volume spilt, toxicity of the product in question or sensitivity of the natural environment affected) are reviewed on a monthly basis and annual statistics are sent to the Group’s Management Committee. All accidental spills are followed by a corrective action aimed at returning the environment to its original state as quickly as possible.

The table below shows the number and volume of accidental hydrocarbon spills with an environmental impact and that are greater than one barrel in volume:

    2013   2012   2011 

Number of hydrocarbon spills with an environmental impact

   169     219     263  

Total volume of hydrocarbon spills with an environmental impact (thousands of m3)

   1.8     2.0     1.8  

Note: Soil on sites is deemed to form part of the natural environment unless sealed.

Excluding the amounts spilled as a result of the Elgin incident in the North Sea (approximately 700 m3) in 2012, the 2013 volumes increased over those of 2012. For the most part, this increase was due to spills at refineries (approximately one-third of the total), over

95% of which were recovered, as well as better reporting at Marketing & Services.

While risk prevention is emphasized, TOTAL regularly addresses the issue of crisis management on the basis of risk scenarios identified.identified through analyses.

In particular, TOTALthe Group has developed emergency plans and procedures to respond to an oil spillin place in the event of a hydrocarbon leak or leak. Thesespill. For accidental spills that reach the surface, anti-pollution plans and procedures are specific to each TOTAL affiliate andsubsidiary or site, which are adapted to its organization,their structure, activities and environment andwhile complying with Group recommendations, are consistent with the Group plan. They areregularly reviewed regularly and tested throughduring exercises. In 2012, the Group’s requirements for preparing emergency plans and the associated exercises were set out in a Group directive.

AtThe Group uses the Group level, TOTAL has set upfollowing indicators to measure its readiness to counteract pollution:

2013

Number of sites whose risk analysis identified at least one scenario of major accidental pollution to surface water

150

Proportion of those sites with an operational anti-pollution plan

87%

Proportion of subsidiaries and sites whose risk analysis identified at least one scenario of accidental pollution to surface water and that have performed at least one anti-pollution exercise during the year

82%

Also available to TOTAL’s subsidiaries, the alert scheme PARAPOL (Plan to Mobilize Resources Against Pollution) alert scheme is used to facilitate crisis management and provide assistance by mobilizing bothat the Group level. Its main aim is to mobilize the internal and external human and physical resources necessary to respond in the event of pollution of marine, coastal or inland waters, without geographical restriction. restriction, at any time, at the request of any site.

The PARAPOL procedure is made available to TOTAL affiliatesGroup and its subsidiaries have assistance agreements with the main goal is to facilitate access to internal experts and physical response resources.

Furthermore, TOTAL and its affiliates are currently members of certainbodies specializing in oil spill cooperatives that are ablemanagement, such as Oil Spill Response Limited, CEDRE and Clean Caribbean & Americas. Their role is to provide expertise, resources and equipment in all

geographic areas of the regions where TOTAL has operations, including in particular Oil Spill Response, CEDRE (Center of documentation, research and experimentation on accidental water pollution) and Clean Caribbean and Americas.operations.

Following the blow-out onblowout of the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 (concerning(in which the Group was not involved), TOTAL created three Task Forcestask forces in order to analyze risks and provideissue recommendations. The task forces finalized most of their work in 2012, and the Group has continued deploying solutions to minimize such risks.

In Exploration & Production, Task Force No. 1 reviewed2012, the safety aspectswork carried out as part of deep offshore drilling operations (wells architecture, designthe Subsea Well Response Project (SWRP), a consortium of blow-out preventers, trainingnine oil companies including TOTAL, paved the way for the construction of personnel based on lessons learned from the serious accidents that occurred recentlyseveral capping systems designed to prevent hydrocarbon spills in the industry). Its efforts have led tounderwater environment. In 2013, three of the implementationfour capping systems were positioned in various parts of even more stringent controls and audits on drilling operations.

Task Force No. 2, coordinated with the Global Industry Response Group (GIRG) created by the OGP (International Association of Oil and Gas Producers), is studying deep offshore oil capture and containment operationsworld, representing a solution that can be launched into action in case of a deepwater drilling pollution incident. The last one will be positioned in 2014.

Additionally, the work carried by TOTAL through its Subsea Emergency Response System (SERS) has also led to the construction of capping equipment to respond to an event on a production well. These capping systems will be positioned in 2014 in the Gulf of Guinea where TOTAL is strongly present in subsea production.

In November 2013, a large-scale exercise to simulate a massive oil leak in deep waters. Inoffshore waters was conducted in Angola. During this 3-day emergency exercise, known as “Lula”, the short term, capture devices will be available inAngolan subsidiary deployed the resources that would have been needed to manage an actual event of this kind (e.g., several regionsships, an

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.55


Item 4 - Other Matters

airplane, helicopters, teams working on the FPSO, at the headquarters of the world where TOTAL hasTotal E&P Angola subsidiary in Luanda and the Group in Paris). It provided the ability to test a strong presence in exploration-production (North Sea, Gulfnumber of Guinea).the systems implemented by the post-Macondo task forces:

Task Force No. 3 related

deployment of a subsea dispersant injection system;

supply chain for large quantities of dispersants;

surface anti-pollution mechanisms (e.g., dispersion, recovery); and

systems for tracking and predicting the location of oil slicks (e.g., satellite tracking, prediction models based on oceanographic/meteorological data).

mobilization of partners that specialize in crisis management and pollution control.

Many lessons have already been learned from this exercise and a detailed feedback report is being drafted to plans to fight accidental spills in order to strengthenfurther improve the Group’s ability to respond to an accident of this scale.

Sustainable use of resources

i. Water:The distribution worldwide of available freshwater varies greatly in space and time. The issue of water consumption therefore requires different responses depending on the regional and technical context.

In order to establish which of its facilities are affected by this issue as a major accidental pollution,priority, TOTAL both:

identifies water withdrawals and discharges across all of its sites; and

identifies sites located in “water stress” areas (watersheds that will have less than 1,700 m3 of renewable freshwater available per person and per year by 2025, according to the Falkenmark indicator), using the Global Water Tool for Oil & Gas developed jointly by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and IPIECA.

    2013   2012   2011 

Freshwater withdrawals excluding cooling water (million m3)

   126     143     142  

Percentage of Group sites, excluding Marketing, located in water-stressed areas

   49%     49%     44%  

The decrease in water withdrawals between 2012 and 2013 is due mainly to the deconsolidation of the Fertilizers business in 2013.

The “Optimizing water consumption on industrial sites” guide sets out best practices for saving and recycling water at all Group sites. The guide has been widely distributed throughout the Group since 2007.

In the activities of exploration and production, re-injecting water extracted at the same time as the hydrocarbons (production water) back into the original reservoir is one of the methods used to maintain reservoir pressure. The technical specifications in force in the Group stipulate that this option must be given priority over other production water treatment technologies.

At refineries and petrochemical sites, water is mainly used to produce steam and for cooling units. Increasing recycling and replacing water by air for cooling are TOTAL’s preferred approaches for reducing freshwater withdrawals.

ii. Soil:Preliminary work for the Joslyn North oil sands mine in Canada began in 2013. Of the 4,000 hectares of forest cleared, about 630 will be rehabilitated at the end of the project (see“— TOTAL and oil sands”, below), with the rest eventually replanted.

Aside from this example, TOTAL uses the ground surface that it needs to safely conduct its industrial operations and, at present, does not make extensive use of ground surfaces that could significantly conflict with the various natural ecosystems or with agriculture.

iii. Raw materials:Hydrocarbons, an energetic material, are the Group’s main raw material. Optimum use of hydrocarbons therefore lies in what is known as “energy efficiency”, as described below.

Since 2011, TOTAL has measured the raw material loss rate for each line of business. This is the percentage of converted raw materials that are neither delivered to any of the business line’s customers nor used for energy purposes.

Raw material loss rate  2013   2012   2011 

Hydrocarbon production line of business

   2.5%     2.8%     2.5%  

Refining line of business

   0.5%     0.5%     0.6%  

iv. Energy efficiency:Streamlining energy use is one of the Group’s performance targets. Internal documents (roadmaps and guides) describe the challenges, set out methodologies and action plans, and include quantified goals to reduce consumption. Since the beginning of 2013, a Group directive has defined the requirements to be met by 2016 at operated sites that use more than 50,000 tons of oil equivalent per year of primary energy.

In early 2013, the Group set an objective to improve energy efficiency by 1.5% per year on average between 2012 and 2017 within Exploration & Production, Refining and Petrochemicals, with the exception of the resins business. These areas represent over 95% of the Group’s net primary energy consumption. A Group Energy Efficiency Index (GEEI) was created in early 2013 to assess the Group’s performance in this area. It consists of a combination of energy intensity ratios (ratio of net primary energy consumption to the level of activity) per business, reduced to base 100 and consolidated with a weighting by each business’s net primary energy consumption. Its value is therefore 100 in 2012 and the goal is to reach 92.5 by 2017.

    2013   2012   2011 

Net primary energy consumption (TWh)

   157     159     158  

Group Energy Efficiency Index (GEEI) (base 100 in 2012)

   102.3     100       

The decrease in net primary energy consumption is due primarily to the sale of the Fertilizers business.

The Group’s energy efficiency worsened in 2013 despite the fact that the performance expected at Refining & Chemicals was achieved. This is mainly the result of the flaring of associated gas during the startup phase of the Usan field in Nigeria, which took longer than expected.

In early 2011, the Group’s internal structure relating to “Climate and Energy” was changed:

A decision-making body was created in the form of the CO2/Energy Efficiency Management Committee. Its role is to define the guidelines and targets on greenhouse gas emissions and energy performance. It is based on a permanent energy efficiency task force and, where applicable, temporary Group-wide task forces.

Energy Network days and the Energy seminar provide opportunities for internal discussion, reflection and information-sharing.

56TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

In France, Energy Efficiency Certificates (Certificats d’économies d’énergie — CEE) are awarded by the Energy and Climate Administration (Direction générale de l’Énergie et du Climat) in recognition of energy-saving activities. TOTAL is encouraging its customers to reduce their energy consumption by 50 TWh (over the entire service life of the product) over the period of 2011 to 2014.

Through the “Total Ecosolutions” program, the Group is also developing innovative products and services that perform above market average on the environmental front, such as by curbing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions while providing the same level of service. At year-end 2013, forty-two products and services bore the “Total Ecosolutions” label. SunPower’s photovoltaic modules, which received the label in 2013, help avoid approximately 40% of greenhouse gas emissions throughout the entire life cycle compared to the market reference (average of the four main competing technologies). The CO2 eq emissions avoided throughout the life cycle by the use of Total Ecosolutions products and services, compared to the use of benchmark products on the market and for an equivalent level of service, are measured annually based on sales volumes. This represented 740,000 t of CO2 eq in 2012. In early 2013, the Group set the following target: to have fifty “Total Ecosolutions” labels by year-end 2015.

In late 2012, TOTAL introduced an energy efficiency scheme that allows its 40,000 employees in France to perform an energy audit of their homes (financed at a blowrate of 50%) and to receive investment subsidies for energy efficiency upgrades under the Energy Efficiency Certificate program in France and special discounts from building professionals who partner with the Group.

v. Use of renewable energies:As part of its strategy, TOTAL has long been committed to developing renewable energies. The main focus in developing renewable energies is solar energy through SunPower (64.65%). TOTAL is also exploring a number of avenues for converting biomass to energy.

A detailed description of the activities carried out by the Group in the field of new energy sources is provided in“Item 4. Business Overview — Marketing & Services segment — New Energies”, above.

TOTAL is using renewable energies to supply power to some production sites. The Group has installed solar photovoltaic panels on several of its buildings (for example, CSTJF in Pau, Lacq, andProvence refinery in France) and certain isolated wellheads, as well as a number of service station canopies in Europe and Africa.

Climate change

i. Greenhouse gas emissions:TOTAL has made reducing greenhouse gas emissions one of its priorities. It has set the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by its operations by 15% from 2008 to 2015. Quantified targets have also been defined in an attempt to reduce flaring (50% reduction between 2005 and 2014) and improve the energy efficiency (1.5% per year between 2012 and 2017). These targets are annually published and tracked.

   2013  2012  2011 

Daily volumes of gas flared (million m3 per day)

  10.8    10.8    10.0  

Operated direct greenhouse gas emissions (Mt CO2 equivalent, 100% of emissions from sites operated by the Group)

  46    47    46  

Group share of direct greenhouse gas emissions (Mt CO2 equivalent, from sites in which TOTAL has a stake)

  51    53(a)   53  

(a)

The 2 Mt CO2 eq correction of the 2012 figure is the result of an error in interpreting the information received from our Novatek partner.

Flaring of associated gas remained stable in 2013 and still includes 2 Mm3 per day from the start-up phase of the Usan site, which is expected to begin its reinjection of associated gas only in 2014 due to the geological structure of the reservoir. Excluding volumes related to the start-up of facilities, the volume of flared associated gas totaled 8.8 Mm3/d, a 40% decrease compared with the baseline year (2005). The Group’s target is a 50% reduction by 2014, excluding start-up phases of new facilities.

The drop in operated direct greenhouse gas emissions is mainly linked to the sale of Fertilizers, which accounted for 1 Mt CO2 eq in 2012.

To ensure that investment projects can withstand the general emergence of a cost of CO2 emissions, investments have been valued since 2008 based on a cost of CO2 emissions of25 per metric ton of CO2 emitted.

TOTAL invests in R&D to reduce direct greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere by other means. The Group especially intends to develop CO2 capture, transport and storage technologies. For several years now, it has been working on CCS (carbon capture and storage), so that it can be used on its industrial sites when permitted by economic and regulatory conditions. Currently, two production sites in which TOTAL has a stake, the Sleipner and Snøhvit fields in Norway, are using these technologies. The research program is ongoing, notably through a pilot project at the Lacq complex in France, where CO2 is being captured by oxy-fuel combustion, transported and stored in a depleted natural gas field. The CO2 pumping phase was stopped in 2013, but the Group will continue to monitor the behavior of the CO2 storage conditions until March 2016.

ii. Adapting to climate change:The Group assesses the vulnerability of its existing and future facilities to predicted climate change.

Climate conditions are factored into the design of industrial facilities, which are not only built to withstand extreme events observed in the past, but also to include additional safety margins.

In addition to adapting to climate change and limiting the effects of human activity on the climate, TOTAL advocates concerted action, particularly the emergence of a balanced, progressive international agreement that prevents the distortion of competition between industries or regions of the world.

Protecting biodiversity

Due to the nature of its business, and particularly because new exploration and production projects are located in potentially sensitive natural environments, TOTAL’s operations are likely to have an impact on biodiversity. More specifically:

impacts related to, for example, construction sites, access roads and linear infrastructures, that can result in habitat fragmentation;

physicochemical impacts leading to changes in environments and habitats, or that might affect or interfere with certain species; and

contribution to the propagation of invasive species in terrestrial and marine environments.

TOTAL is aware of these challenges and takes biodiversity into account in its guidelines at a total lossnumber of containmentlevels:

the Safety Health Environment Quality Charter (refer to“— Health Safety Environment Quality Charter”, above), Article 10 of which specifies: “TOTAL (…) monitors and controls (…) (its) impact on biodiversity”; and

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.57


Item 4 - Other Matters

a biodiversity policy that details the Group’s principles for action in this area:

¡

minimizing the impact of operations on biodiversity throughout the facility life cycle;

¡

incorporating biodiversity protection into the environmental management system, particularly initial analyses, and social and environmental impact studies;

¡

paying specific attention to operations in regions with particularly rich or vulnerable biodiversity; and

¡

informing and raising the awareness of employees, customers and the public, helping to improve understanding of ecosystems.

This policy is implemented by means of a number of tools and rules. In Exploration & Production, rules and specifications govern the performance of baseline surveys and environmental impact assessments on land or at sea. Since 2011, all Group business units have had access to a detailed mapping tool detailing the world’s protected areas based on regularly updated data from an FPSO (Floating Production, StorageUNEP-WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Center). The Group has renewed its partnership with UNEP-WCMC for 2013-2015.

In 2012, TOTAL acquired acreage near Lake Albert in Uganda in partnership with CNOOC and Offloading facility)Tullow (33% each). TOTAL is the operator of Block 1 of this license, most of which is located in Murchison Falls National Park and the Ramsar zone of the Albert Nile Delta. This initiative has led,IUCN II-classified park was created in particular to protect its fauna, which includes such iconic species as large mammals (for example, elephants and Rothschild’s giraffes), reptiles and numerous birds (including the shoebill). In light of this site’s unique biodiversity, and in addition to applying the general principles of the Group’s biodiversity policy, Total E&P Uganda set as its objective a sharpnet increase in biodiversity. To this end, Total E&P Uganda has adopted specific operating rules, such as using wireless geophone systems for seismic campaigns, limiting the volumesize of dispersants availabledrilling pads to 1 hectare (100 m x 100 m) and mapping biodiversity hotspots to prevent interference with areas sensitive for fauna (e.g., breeding grounds) during the current seismic campaign, especially in the Albert Nile Delta. A dedicated social and environmental team, whose members include biodiversity specialists, has been created. A “Biodiversity and Livelihood Advisory Committee” has been set up with external stakeholders from national and international organizations specializing in nature conservation and relations between communities and wildlife. Its role is to ensure that Total E&P Uganda is aware of and implements best practices for its operations inside the park in order to help it meet its objective of a net increase in biodiversity.

TOTAL classifies protected areas around the world according to the categories defined by IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature). TOTAL consistently aims to launch biodiversity action plans leveraging industry best practices for projects at new facilities and production sites (excluding exploration, storage and distribution operations) in the most sensitive protected areas corresponding to IUCN categories I to IV, such as national parks. In-depth studies are carried out prior to each new field development project and may lead to a series of preventive measures. For instance, in January 2012, the authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo awarded TOTAL an oil exploration license (Block III), 30% of which is located in the Virunga national park, which is listed among the UNESCO natural World Heritage sites. TOTAL made a public commitment not to work within the Group.zone currently defined as a national park. This commitment was reiterated during the Shareholders’ Meeting in

May 2013. More generally, TOTAL has undertaken to refrain from prospecting or exploiting oil and gas in natural sites inscribed on the World Heritage List as at June 4, 2013.

Finally, TOTAL is involved in sector-specific initiatives, such as those spearheaded by IPIECA, which in 2010 resulted in the publication of a guide to the issue of invasive species. Recommendations include taking seasons into account when planning work and checking the origin of the equipment used.

Consumer health and safety

Many of the products that TOTAL markets pose a potential health risk if they are incorrectly used. The Group therefore meets its current and future obligations with regard to information and prevention in order to minimize the risks throughout the product life cycle.

TOTAL uses various guidelines to ensure compliance with the necessary measures to be implemented to promote consumer health and safety:

the Safety Health Environment Quality Charter (Articles 1 and 5; see“— Health Safety Environment Quality Charter”, above);

a health policy that sets out the Group’s principles for action in relation to incident prevention and protecting the health of people in direct or indirect contact with its products throughout the entire product life cycle, including customers, users and anyone else involved (health and products); and

a directive stating the minimum requirements for marketing products worldwide in order to avoid or reduce potential risks to consumer health and the environment.

TOTAL identifies and assesses the risks inherent in its products and their use, and then informs customers and users of these risks and the applicable prevention and protection measures. The material safety data sheets (MSDS) that accompany all products marketed by the Group (in at least one of the languages used in the country) and product labels are two key sources of information in this regard. All new products comply fully with the regulatory requirements in the countries and markets for which they are intended.

As part of the first phase of the European REACH Regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals), the Group has registered a total of 214 chemical substances. This regulation aims to protect the health of consumers and professionals by means of a stringent assessment of the toxicological effects for each substance use scenario and the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures.

TOTAL and oil sands

With the development of several major projects in the Canadian oil sands, TOTAL expects to produce 200 kb/d of bitumen within ten to fifteen years. It is vital that the environmental challenges, and in particular the impact on water, the rehabilitation of the land and the ecosystems affected, together with greenhouse gas emissions, are taken into account. For several years, TOTAL has been actively involved in the various collaborative research initiatives undertaken by Canadian industry into these areas, and invests approximately CAD 30 million each year. In particular, TOTAL is one of the founding members of COSIA (Canadian Oil Sands Innovation Alliance), an initiative launched in 2012 by fourteen producers in Canada to accelerate the improvement in the environmental performance of Canadian oil sands by promoting collaboration and innovation.

(1)

Including nine Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services companies in France.

58TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

In order to restrict water consumption on the Surmont (50%) in situ project, the Group has been working with the operator to optimize water use and recycling. For phase 2 of the project, which is scheduled to begin production in 2015, the selected option is expected to permit water to be withdrawn only from saline aquifers and not from freshwater aquifers or rivers, which will lead to additional processing costs. On Joslyn North (38.25%, operator), TOTAL has committed to building a freshwater storage facility sufficient for ninety days of production, in order to reduce withdrawals from the Athabasca River in low flow periods.

The Group believesis also involved in oil industry initiatives to improve management of the waste associated with developing oil sand mines, which has historically been stored in tailing ponds. For Joslyn, TOTAL is planning to use processes to separate waste flows and thicken the finest waste, and even flocculation and centrifuging, in order to significantly reduce the size of the tailing ponds and ensure that itthey are solidified within a few years.

As open-pit mining of oil sands disturbs land and ecosystems, TOTAL is impossiblecommitted to guarantee thattheir sustainable rehabilitation throughout its operations, taking into account the contingencies or liabilities relatedspecific features of the boreal forest. Sixty percent of the rehabilitation work at Joslyn is expected be completed at the end of mining, and the rest in the next seven years.

Over and above Canadian industry’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the entire oil sands production chain (which are approximately 10% to 15% higher than the average for conventional crude in a complete “well to wheel” cycle, according to the above mentioned health, safetyGroup’s estimates), TOTAL plans to install cogeneration units at its mines. The Group is also involved in carbon capture and environmental concerns will not havestorage project analyses in Alberta.

Mindful of its responsibilities to its stakeholders and neighbors, and particularly the First Nations, TOTAL opened a materialpermanent office in Fort McMurray in 2006. Since that time, the Group has entered into socioeconomic agreements with the Fort McKay, Athabasca Chipewyan and Mikisew Cree First Nations, and with the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo. These reflect TOTAL’s commitment to engaging in dialogue with the communities living near its facilities and allowing them to benefit from the economic impact onof its business, assetsactivities.

TOTAL and liabilities, consolidated financial situation, cash flowshale gas

TOTAL has stakes either as operator or incomeas partner in the future.

Oil andseveral shale gas exploration and production operationslicenses in the United Kingdom, Poland, Denmark, United States, Argentina, Uruguay, China and Australia.

In every country where the Group has operations, its Environmental charter and the Societal directive, backed by its compliance with local legislation, provide the framework for its operations.

The environmental challenges associated with shale gas development include reducing the quantity and impact of chemical additives, optimizing water management, and reducing the visual impact and disturbance caused by the operations. TOTAL’s operational and R&D teams are working to find appropriate technological solutions.

In Europe, where TOTAL has stakes in Denmark and Poland as operator, and in the United Kingdom where it has stakes since January 2014, the Group is focusing its efforts on listening to the various contacts so that the operations can proceed in a way that is acceptable to all stakeholders. TOTAL has also made a commitment to be more transparent, whether by providing

information about projects or by supporting the initiative of the Oil and Gas Producers association, which entails publishing information about fracturing fluids (ngsfacts.org). TOTAL believes that shale gas will have a place in the European energy mix, if the exploration campaigns confirm the economic viability of this resource in Europe.

In the United States, TOTAL is a partner in the appraisal, development and production of shale gas with licenses in the Barnett (Texas) and Utica (Ohio) plays.

In Argentina, TOTAL has stakes either as operator or partner in several shale gas licenses in the Neuquén basin.

In Uruguay, TOTAL is present as operator in two exploration licenses located primarily in the Artigas province in the northwest

of the country. The work planned includes geological, geochemical and environmental surveys.

In Australia, TOTAL is present in four shale gas exploration licenses in the South Georgina basin in the center of the country. TOTAL can increase its stake to 68% and become the operator in the event of development.

In China, TOTAL signed an agreement in 2013 to study the shale gas potential in the Xuancheng license, 300 km to the west of Shanghai.

TOTAL and the Arctic

According to a survey published by the USGS (United States Geological Survey) in 2012, the Arctic might hold 13% of the world’s undiscovered conventional oil resources and 30% of its undiscovered gas resources. These substantial resources could help to meet the rise in demand for energy in the coming decades.

For exploration and production require high levelsin the Arctic, major challenges must be overcome given the difficult weather and oceanographic conditions, logistical constraints and the nature of investmentthe technologies to be deployed in a particularly sensitive ecosystem.

TOTAL currently does not conduct any exploration activities in oil fields under the ice cap.

At the same time, TOTAL is involved in research into the specific issues in the Arctic, in particular through its “Grands froids” (deep cold) R&D program. TOTAL is also taking part in the Joint Industry Program that brings together oil companies and are associated with particular risksscientific organizations in research into the means of preventing, detecting and opportunities. These activities are subjectresponding to risks related specificallyaccidental pollution by hydrocarbons.

The Group is involved in various projects, including in Norway (Snøhvit, active exploration in the Barents sea) and in Russia (Kharyaga, Yamal LNG, Termokarstovoye).

TOTAL and the Western Sahara

Off the coast of Western Sahara, Morocco awarded an authorization of reconnaissance for the Anzarane Offshore block in December 2011 to the difficultiesOffice National Marocain des Hydrocarbures et des Mines (ONHYM – National Moroccan Bureau of exploring underground,Petroleum and Mines) and Total E&P Maroc. This authorization was extended for another year, first in December 2012 and then again in December 2013. The authorization of reconnaissance for the characteristics of hydrocarbons and the physical characteristics ofAnzarane Offshore block is not an oil or gas field. Of risks related tocontract given that it covers only geological and geophysical studies.

To date, preliminary geological studies have been carried out and a 3D seismic survey over an area of 5,900 km2 was conducted by

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.59


Item 4 - Other Matters

ONHYM between November 2012 and July 2013. At this stage, the oil and gas potential of the area has not yet been assessed. Several more months will be needed to process and interpret the seismic data, which had led to the extension of the authorization of reconnaissance.

At the time of the extension of the authorization of reconnaissance in December 2013, Total E&P Maroc signed with ONHYM a joint public declaration and a memorandum of understanding. In the joint declaration, the Moroccan party emphasizes its commitment to comply with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,

particularly as regards consultation with the local populations and the benefit they will derive from the exploration geologic risks areand mining of natural resources. The memorandum of understanding outlines corporate social responsibility principles for the most important. For example, exploratory wells may not resultprospecting period and for any subsequent phases.

In the Western Sahara region where the Anzarane Offshore block is located, as in other places where it operates, TOTAL complies with the applicable laws and international standards mentioned in the discoveryGroup’s Code of hydrocarbons, Conduct, particularly those related to human rights.

Social information

Organization of work

The average work week is determined by applicable local law. It is less than forty hours in most of the subsidiaries in Europe and Japan, and forty hours in most of the Asian and African countries. It is longer in the United States and India.

Depending on current local law, there are several programs that aim to create a better balance between work and private life and/or may resultto encourage equal career opportunities. In France, teleworking was introduced in amounts2012. As of December 31, 2013, there were 255 teleworkers in the oil and petrochemicals perimeter(1), 45% of whom were managers and 30% men.

    WHRS 2013  WHRS 2012  WHRS 2011 

% of companies offering the option of working part-time

   63%(a)   69  63

% of employees working part-time of those given the option

   5.2  5  5

% of companies offering the option of teleworking

   22  19  15

% of employees involved in teleworking of those given the option

   2.3  2  3

(a)The reduction in this percentage from 2012 to 2013 is due to the differences in the scope of the WHRS.

The sickness absenteeism rate is one of the indicators monitored in the WHRS:

    WHRS 2013  WHRS 2012  WHRS 2011 

Sickness absenteeism rate

   2.5  2.6  2.7

Dialogue with employees

TOTAL’s employees and their representatives have a privileged position and role among the numerous stakeholders with which the Group has and intends to develop regular dialogue. In countries where employee representation is not required by law, TOTAL strives to set up such representation (for example in Myanmar and Nigeria). There are therefore employee representatives in the majority of Group companies, most of whom are elected. The subjects covered by dialogue with employees vary from company to company, but there are common major themes such as work time, health and safety, compensation, training and equal opportunity.

Organizational changes were carried out in the Group in 2013 in consultation with employee representatives and paved the way for a constructive social dialogue, leading to agreements such as the one on commitments in the context of the disposal of TIGF and the one relating to the mechanism of providing labor support measures for the future of the petrochemical platform in Carling.

In France, thirty-two agreements were signed with employee representatives in 2012, covering in particular retirement conditions, compensation systems, geographical relocations and teleworking.

    

WHRS

2013

  

WHRS

2012

  

WHRS

2011

 

Percentage of companies with employee representation

   71.6%(a)   79.9  77.4

Percentage of employees covered by collective agreements

   67  67.7  70.3

(a)The reduction in this percentage from 2012 to 2013 is due to the differences in the scope of the WHRS.

TOTAL continues to develop dialogue with employees on a European scale through negotiations with European trade union federations.

Several agreements have been signed, including, for example, the convention on labor relations and equal opportunities that aims to set up a common social platform applicable to all the Group’s European entities.

A single Work Committee representing European personnel has been set up at the Group-wide level in order to inform employees and hold discussions on the Group’s strategy, its social, economic and financial situation, as well as questions of sustainable development, CSR and safety on a European scale. It also examines any significant proposed organizational change concerning at least two companies in two European countries, to express its opinion, in addition to the procedures initiated before the national representative bodies.

In addition, every other year TOTAL carries out an internal survey amongst its employees to gather their views and expectations with regard to their work situation and perception of the Company, locally and as a Group. The results of the survey conducted in 2013 amongst 70% of the Group employees show that they have a commitment rate of 73% and that 85% of them are proud to work for TOTAL.

Training

The Group has four priority goals in the field of training:

sharing TOTAL’s Corporate values, in particular with respect to ethics and corporate HSE;

increasing key skills in all business areas and maintaining a high level of operating performance;

(1)

Including nine Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services companies in France.

60TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

promoting employees’ integration and career development through induction, management and personal development training; and

supporting the policy of diversity and mobility within the Group through language and intercultural training.

The Group’s efforts in the field of training continued in 2013: 87% of employees followed at least one training course and, within the scope of the WHRS, 454,000 days of training were offered for a total training budget of about290 million (mentoring represents approximately 23%). Priorities for technical training or training that meets the specific needs of the activities are implemented

would be insufficientby the operational business divisions in order to allow for economic development. Even ifbetter meet the needs of the personnel.

In 2013, the Group continued its effort to provide HSE training, with programs focusing on HSE Culture. This year also marked an economic analysis of estimated hydrocarbon reserves justifiesacceleration in the development of a discovery,managerial programs abroad, particularly to strengthen equal career opportunities in the reserves can prove lower thanGroup. Moreover, TOTAL has continued the estimates duringlarge-scale deployment of business-specific e-learning modules and programs on such cross-functional topics as diversity, compliance, competition law, the production process, thus adversely affecting the economic development.

Almost all the exploration and production operations of TOTAL are accompanied by a high level of risk of loss of the invested capital due to the risks related to economic or political factors detailed hereafter. It is impossible to guarantee that new resources of crude oil or of natural gas will be discovered in sufficient amounts to replace the reserves currently being developed, produced and sold to enable TOTAL to recover the capital it has invested.

The development of oil and gas fields,chain, etc. In 2013, 33,000 people attended at least one module.

Average number of days’ training/year per employee (including mentoring,
excludinge-learning)
  WHRS 2013  WHRS 2012  WHRS 2011 

Group average

   5.2    5.5    5.8  

By segment

    

Upstream

   9.6    8.9    9.5  

Exploration & Production

   9.9    9.2    9.8  

Gas & Power

   2.4    5.1    5.3  

Refining & Chemicals

   4.6    4.9    5.0  

Refining & Chemicals

   4.6    4.9    5.0  

Trading & Shipping

   1.8    1.9    2.1  

Marketing & Services

   3.4    4.2    4.4  

Marketing & Services

   3.6    4.7    4.4  

New Energies

   2.7    2.0    6.2  

Corporate

   3.3    2.9    2.4  

By region

    

Africa

   9.4    9.2    8.3  

North America

   5.0    8.3    7.9  

Latin America

   6.9    4.1    6.2  

Asia-Pacific

   5.1    6.0    9.4  

Europe

   4.1    4.6    4.5  

Middle East

   9.4    11.6    13.9  

Oceania

   2.6    3.4    1.5  

French Overseas Departments and Territories

   2.3    2.4    1.5  

Breakdown by type of training given (including mentoring, excluding e-learning)

    

Technical

   41  42  42

Safety

   25  27  29

Language

   12  11  8

Other(a)

   22  20  21

(a)

Other: management, personal development, intercultural.

Equal opportunity

TOTAL strives to offer equal opportunities to all its employees throughout their professional careers. An action plan was launched in 2004 to ensure that not only recruiters and career managers, but also business unit managers comply with the constructionprinciple of equal opportunities.

Since 2004, the Group’s Diversity Council, chaired by a member of the Executive Committee, has been overseeing activities with a view to increasing the number of women employees, international employees and local employees up to the highest levels of management. Promoting diversity goes hand-in-hand with combating all forms of discrimination within the Group, whether in relation to openness to different social background, equal opportunities for men and women or the hiring and retaining of employees with disabilities.

Equal treatment for men and women

In addition to the various collective agreements embodying its commitment to equal treatment of men and women, TOTAL signed in 2010 the Women’s Empowerment Principles — Equality Means Business (unglobalcompact.org), set out by the United Nations Global Compact.

The Group intends to continue to foster gender diversity in all the Group’s professions and to enable women to gain access to all levels of responsibility on equal terms with their male counterparts. In this regard, the Diversity Council monitors the following indicators:

% of women  2013  2012  2011 

In recruitment on open-ended contracts

   36  31  29

Employees in management recruitment/JL(1)³10

   29  27  28

Employees

   31  30  30

Employees in management/JL³10

   24  24  23

Employees in senior management

   17  16  15

(1)JL: the level of the job position according to the Hay method. The Hay method is a unique reference framework used to classify and assess jobs. JL10 corresponds to junior managers.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.61


Item 4 - Other Matters

TOTAL also participates in the BoardWomen Partners program, which aims to significantly increase the proportion of women in the boards of large companies throughout Europe. Following the 2012 Shareholders’ Meeting, 33% of TOTAL S.A.’s Board of Directors were women, compared with 26% before the meeting.

The Group also shows its commitment through agreements or provisions relating to access to employment, maternity and paternity leave, child care facilities, working conditions, balancing work and family responsibilities, and managing dual careers.

In addition, the Group offers women the opportunity to share and discuss through TWICE (Total Women’s Initiative for Communication and Exchange), created in 2006 and restarted in 2009. The aim of this network is to promote career development for women in line with TOTAL’s gender diversity strategy. This initiative is currently in place in France and around the world (Germany, Angola, Belgium, Cameroon, Canada, China, Congo, United Arab Emirates, Gabon, Indonesia, Italy, Nigeria and Singapore) and has over 3,000 members. TWICE offers a mentoring program that supports women in their professional development by helping them better negotiate the key phases of their career, deepen their self-exploration and expand their network.

Internationalization of management

With employees representing over 130 nationalities, TOTAL enjoys great cultural diversity, and it is important that this be reflected at all levels of the Company and across all business segments.

The Group’s companies recruit for a highly varied portfolio of business segments, usually with a large technical component, and strive to prioritize local recruitment.

In 2013, 73% of managers recruited were non-French, representing more than eighty different nationalities. Several measures have been put in place so that the internationalization of management reflects this diversity, including harmonizing human resources practices (for example with regard to hiring and annual appraisals), increasing the number of foreign postings for non-French employees, and decentralizing training.

% of non-French  2013  2012  2011 

In recruitment on open-ended contracts

   90  88  87

Employees in management recruitment/JL³10

   73  71  75

Employees

   67  64  64

Employees in management/JL³10

   61  59  59

Employees in senior management

   26  25  23

Measures promoting the employment and integration of people with disabilities

For over twenty years, TOTAL has set out its disability policy in France through successive agreements signed with employee representatives to promote the employment of workers with disabilities.

While promoting the direct recruitment of disabled people and cooperation with the sector for disabled workers, TOTAL also takes various types of action:

¡

in-house: integration, professional training, job retention, advertising, awareness sessions organized for managers and teams, Human Resources managers, etc.; and

¡

externally: cooperation with recruitment agencies, information and advertising aimed at students, attendance at specialized recruitment forums, etc.

In continuation of the work already undertaken, three new 3-year framework agreements (2013-2015) with the French representative unions set out TOTAL’s policy in France with regard to integrating people with disabilities into the work world.

Measures promoting non-discrimination and diversity

In addition to basing its recruitment policy on the principle of non-discrimination, TOTAL is involved in a number of initiatives to promote diversity. In France, the Group is in particular a partner in the action taken by IMS-Entreprendre pour la Cité (Institut Mécénat-Solidarité), with a view to facilitating the integration of young graduates into the workplace.

The TOTAL Foundation also works alongside several associations that help young graduates from disadvantaged backgrounds to find jobs or support them in further education.

Community development information

TOTAL’s aim is to be known, both by host governments and by its partners, as an operator that strives for excellence. Wherever it operates and in line with the values and principles set out in its Code of Conduct, Ethics Charter and Safety Health Environment Quality Charter, TOTAL places its commitment to community development at the heart of its corporate responsibility to create value that is shared with those residing near its facilities, its suppliers and its employees. This approach, which is deployed within most of the Group’s business units directly linked to operations, encompasses the action taken to improve the Group’s integration into the countries where it operates.

Managing risks, facilitating operations and creating opportunities are the three components of a coherent strategy of reducing negative impacts and promoting socioeconomic development through close cooperation with national authorities and with the support of local populations. To accomplish this, openness, dialogue and engagement are essential for developing constructive and transparent relations with all stakeholders.

In concrete terms, the primary goal is to strengthen the local content (employment and subcontracting) of the Group’s activities, foster economic diversification, support educational and skills improvement projects, promote the heritage and cultural wealth of local communities, contribute to human and social development and, in particular, facilitate access to energy for the most disadvantaged populations via innovative and long-term social business solutions.

New societal reporting tools were developed in 2012 and implemented in 2013 to better monitor the community development initiative as a whole, in line with the defined strategic priorities (Group societal policy and directive). The Group’s societal reporting on the operated scope now consists of two parts:

A qualitative self-assessment questionnaire of the application of the societal directive. This questionnaire can be used to assess and manage the degree of deployment of the societal directive in the Group.

A quantitative questionnaire listing all the local community development actions taken by the Group’s operational divisions.

62TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

This new annual reporting aims to improve the measurement of the efforts made by the Group in this field.

In 2013, a cross-functional working group developed eight societal performance indicators with reference to the societal policy: two indicators measure the quality of social dialogue with stakeholders, one indicator concerns the management of the impact of the Group’s activities, four others focus on economic and social development projects and the drillinglast one on access to energy. These indicators, applicable to all the community development actions consolidated at the Group level from 2014, will allow a more accurate analysis of the societal approach of the subsidiaries and sites and will serve as a tool to monitor the Group’s community actions.

The Group’s expertise is based on the continuous professionalization of its community development engineers. Tools such as structuring projects, setting goals and monitoring and assessing indicators have enabled TOTAL to progress from anaid-giving approach to one in which communities take charge of their own development. In Exploration & Production, more than 400 people are involved in community development (including experts under contract), with over 360 involved on a full-time basis. Furthermore, TOTAL is one of the only companies to dedicate a person in the Group’s Head Office to relationships with NGOs.

Dialogue and involvement with stakeholders

For some twenty years, changes in the regulatory framework have promoted the information, consultation and dialogue with stakeholders prior to making decisions that have a significant environmental impact.

In addition to complying with regulations, TOTAL sets up structures for dialogue at every level of the Group. Communities neighboring TOTAL’s sites often have questions about the impact of the Group’s activities on health, safety and the environment. Establishing a dialogue with the residents and with other local stakeholders helps provide answers to these legitimate concerns.

The number one requirement of the societal directive is that “each asset must consult its stakeholders regularly to gain a clearer understanding of their expectations and concerns, measure their level of satisfaction regarding the Group, and identify avenues of improvement for its societal strategy”.

i. Stakeholder consultation processes: TOTAL strives to develop a continuous dialogue with its stakeholders and to ensure the long-term sustainability of this relationship through various mechanisms and structures. Along these lines, the Group has launched various initiatives in recent years:

Several documents have been created to formalize the societal methodology at TOTAL: Guide to Stakeholder Dialogue, Local Community Guide, Practical guide for Local Development, E&P Societal Guide & Manual.

In the Group’s Exploration & Production subsidiaries, and particularly during the project phase, CLOs (Community Liaison Officers) often play a key role. These officers, who come from the local community, speak its language and understand its practices, are employed by TOTAL and trained in the culture and specific characteristics of the oil industry. CLOs promote the company’s integration in the local context and are the first link in its community development initiative. For example, in Uganda, the Exploration & Production subsidiary has set up a highly structured process to select eight CLOs and prepare them for their tasks. All of

them come from the voluntary and NGO sectors and have a good knowledge of the social fabric. Each of them speak a local language and can therefore speak to the concerned people in their language. Similarly, in Yemen, a department is dedicated to relations with stakeholders.

A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) can be signed with the communities to formalize an agreement. For example, in Indonesia, working committees signed an MoU with the communities, local authorities and Total E&P Indonesia in 2013. Other MoUs have been signed in Nigeria and Canada.

“Open houses” have been created in Yemen and the Republic of South Sudan. Public consultations are also organized, as well as meetings with stakeholders (Australia, Brunei, Democratic Republic of Congo), consultations and media campaigns.

The signature of “Responsible Care®”, a voluntary commitment of the global chemicals industry, led to the creation of Community Advisory Panels in the United States, developed at the initiative of the American Chemistry Council. The “Terrains d’entente” (common ground) initiative was launched in France in 2002 within TOTAL’s Chemicals business segment (now integrated into the Refining & Chemicals segment) with the objective to strengthen dialogue between industrial sites and their environment.

Initiated by TOTAL, the “Safety and Environment Commission” of the Feluy industrial park in Belgium is a voluntary forum for dialogue among industrial players, authorities and residents on the effects of companies’ operations in the areas of safety, health and environmental protection.

The “Conférence Riveraine” (residents’ conference) was set up in 2007 by the Feyzin refinery in France, in partnership with the Feyzin town council. This residents’ dialogue forum improves the living conditions of the neighboring population and its relationship with the site. It was recognized by the authorities as a consultation partner under the technological risk prevention plan.

Site monitoring commissions, which succeeded the local information and consultation committees in France, pursuant to the French technological risk prevention act, have been created.

In 2011, a collective consultation process was introduced in the Lorraine region of France involving stakeholders from all the Group’s business segments operating in this region.

ii.“SRM+” dialogue tool: To put its approach to community development at its sites and subsidiaries on a professional footing, TOTAL implemented the internal SRM+ (Stakeholder Relationship Management) tool in 2006. It is used to identify and map the main stakeholders, schedule meetings with them and understand their perception and challenges, and then draw up an action plan for building a long-term relationship.

SRM+ was deployed by Exploration & Production in Qatar and Kenya in 2013.

The Marketing & Services segment carried out further deployments of SRM+ in 2013, including:

India (Namakkal): seventeen stakeholders were interviewed and concurred that the subsidiary’s team maintained a good relationship with its environment.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.63


Item 4 - Other Matters

Some issues, such as power cuts, public information and economic development of the community, were raised. An action plan was built by the community development team and validated by the executive committee. It includes twenty-two actions, some of which have already been carried out, such as renovating the roof of the village community center using recycled materials. The building was then inaugurated along with the villagers.

Jamaica: twenty-nine stakeholders were identified, of whom fourteen were interviewed. The action plan features eleven priority actions to be implemented. This exercise helped identify areas for improvement such as distributing HSEQ documents (e.g., HSE charter, best practices, check lists) to customers, but also some medium/long term actions such as organizing a forum of local small and medium enterprises (e.g., on accounting, energy savings, finance), developing the skills of fuel attendants or setting up partnerships on environmental matters.

The Africa/Middle East division is in an active phase of development: about ten subsidiaries launched an SRM+ approach in 2013 (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Gambia, Mali, Sierra Leone, Togo, Congo, Gabon, Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi, Reunion Island). These deployments took place either at depots, around certain service stations or at the Head Office depending on the specific issues faced by each subsidiary. The progress varies from one subsidiary to another, but the actions plans identified will be implemented.

iii.Dialogue with indigenous and tribal peoples: TOTAL is aware of the specificities of indigenous and tribal peoples (as identified in the International Labor Organization’s Convention No. 169), and has introduced a Charter of principles and guidelines regarding indigenous and tribal peoples in contact with its subsidiaries. Under this Charter and in compliance with its Code of Conduct, the Group strives to get to know and understand the legitimate needs of the communities neighboring its subsidiaries. In particular, this Charter encourages the subsidiaries to call on experts to identify and understand the expectations and specificities of indigenous peoples, to consult them through dialogue before starting industrial projects and to make a positive contribution to their socioeconomic development.

Further, CDA or “Collaborative Learning Project”, an American non-profit organization specialized in handling conflicts with local communities, helps the Group to assess the local communities’ perception of the social impact of its projects in high risk regions. The Nigeria Oil & Gas Corporate Social Responsibility 2012 prize was awarded to Total E&P Nigeria for its commitment to local communities.

Respect for human rights is a factor of social recognition: the Group is recognized today (notably by the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi) as a responsible investor in Myanmar.

Fully aware that taking human rights into consideration is one of the cornerstones of its industrial projects with respect to local populations, TOTAL participated in 2012 in the work of the IPIECA (global oil and gas industry association for environmental and social issues) to develop the guide entitled “Indigenous Peoples and the oil and gas industry: context, issues and emerging good practices”. The Group also contributed to the “Oxfam America’s Community Consent Index”, a collection of best practices in terms

of FPIC (Free Prior Informed Consent). The Group thus shared its experience with the Guarani people in Bolivia. The subsidiary Total E&P Bolivia has embarked on an exemplary partnership with the Guarani communities in the Santa Cruz department. The subsidiary has launched a number of socioeconomic development initiatives, by striving to rectify discriminations, especially, gender discrimination.

Example: dialogue with indigenous and tribal peoples in Bolivia

Since 2011, Total E&P Bolivia has been developing a gas deposit discovered in 2004 in the eastern lowlands of Bolivia. This project to construct a gas plant and a pipeline of over 100 km falls within a stringent legal framework that protects the rights of indigenous people. The consultation process, undertaken by the government, helps identify the economic and sociocultural impacts of the project and, where appropriate, opens the door to the negotiation of financial compensation between the concerned company and the stakeholders, for the impacts that cannot be mitigated.

The consultation process initiated by the subsidiary in 2011 to obtain the environmental permit was suspended in the wake of opposition from an indigenous organization that owns a part of the project area regarding rights of use and passage.

Consultation with the indigenous peoples resumed from May to September 2013 and the negotiations on rights of use resulted in an agreement. The Group’s societal directive and its implementation in Exploration & Production helped the subsidiary to manage the community development component of the project. Open-mindedness, dialogue and perseverance enabled to forge ties with the communities and notably to discuss with several contacts from different groups of stakeholders, formal but also informal leaders, to send across the same message to all in a process of direct dialogue with the concerned communities and not just with their representatives.

Internally, the subsidiary’s community development team became stronger and more professional and also acquired the necessary tools (community development plan and procedures). Externally, the team strives to foster dialogue, relies on the government as the mediator and reaches out to a number of contacts. It strives to inform the project’s neighbors about the status of the negotiations, the reasons for its position and the challenges faced by the project. A participatory approach also aims to involve the communities.

iv. Grievance handling: An increasing number of Exploration & Production subsidiaries are setting up a grievance mechanism for local communities impacted by industrial projects. In line with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, a guide related to this complaints procedure was developed and published in August 2013. This procedure forms an integral part of the societal management plan and embodies the first requirement of the Group’s societal directive. For example, a specific mechanism has been introduced in Uganda as part of the societal management plan.

To improve the management of relationships and dialogue with stakeholders, the IPIECA has launched a pilot project to promote the introduction of international standards and best practices in the industry. Total E&P Congo was selected as the pilot to implement this grievance mechanism. This process is consistent with a willingness to dialogue with the stakeholders to strengthen the ties

64TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

with the Djeno community, to avert societal risks and foster a proactive and responsible management of the subsidiary’s operations. In 2012, IPIECA engaged the firm Triple R Alliance and several missions were carried out at Total E&P Congo in 2012 and 2013 to complete and improve the efficiency of the already existing procedures for receiving and handling grievances.

Controlling the impact of the Group’s activities

i. Integration of a societal approach into operational processes: In order to better control the impact of the Group’s operations, the societal approach is integrated into the operational processes.

Since 2012, societal issues have been integrated into Exploration & Production’s HSE management system known as MAESTRO (Management and Expectations Standards Towards Robust Operations). Seven audits were conducted in 2013 in the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Uganda, Bolivia, Argentina, the UK and Malaysia.

Since 2012, the MOST tool (Management Operational Societal Tool) has been employed to steer and coordinate societal projects. It was set up in 2012 in the Group’s subsidiaries in Congo, Gabon, Angola, Nigeria, Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar and Yemen. In 2013, it was implemented in Italy, Indonesia, Bolivia and Venezuela. This system brings together such modules as “dialogue with stakeholders”, “grievance handling”, “land compensation” and “contributions to development” (with a “local employment” module in Uganda), with functionality that has been further improved in 2013. The use of these tools is part of the process to help the local teams monitor and manage the societal approach with a higher degree of professionalism.

In 2013, impact assessments were notably conducted in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, Total E&P Congo became an operator in Block III in Lake Albert. TOTAL made the commitment not to carry out any exploration activity in the Virunga national park, partly located in Block III. With the consent of the Congolese national authorities and in compliance with internal rules, an Environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) was conducted from September 2012 to June 2013 with two visits to the block. About 170 stakeholders were consulted. Two days were devoted to reporting the assessment findings, on the spot, to the stakeholders. A formal presentation followed by a discussion and a question-answer session was organized for the local and regional administrative authorities. One day was also organized for the stakeholders, who were invited to review the assessment findings and to discuss with TOTAL’s management and technical team.

In Uganda, Total E&P Uganda operates in certain blocks in partnership with the companies Tullow and CNOOC. According to Ugandan law, TOTAL is not required to carry out any impact assessment until the government has approved the project. However, given the need to gather and integrate a wealth of information about the societal context and potential impacts on the communities, Total E&P Uganda chose to engage a team of international and national experts to conduct a “social screening”. About twenty communities were consulted using recognized methods including interviews, focus groups, inventory of communities and direct observation on the field. The results of the social screening led to significant changes in the project to avoid and minimize the impact on the communities living close to future facilities.

In Nigeria, research has been entrusted since 2008 to ESSEC/IRENE (Advanced High School of Economic and Commercial Sciences/ Institute for Research and Education in Negotiation in Europe) on the impact of oil production or injection wells require advanced technologyactivities on people living in the Niger Delta with field surveys and interviews with 2,000 people (Onelga and Eastern Obolo). The aim of this research is to determine a set of impact indicators capable of measuring the direct effect of the Group’s activities on the living conditions of the impacted populations. The results are expected to be consolidated in 2014 and will serve as a basis for a study involving the creation of simplified indicators for other subsidiaries.

In addition, the Group regularly calls on CDA to assess the impact of its operations and socioeconomic programs in host countries. For example, CDA has undertaken several assignments in Myanmar in recent years, the reports of which are available on the organization’s website.

ii. Road safety awareness initiatives in Africa: Over the years, the Group has developed a major project to raise road safety awareness among all categories of road users. Given its distribution activity on the African continent, the Africa/Middle East division is particularly sensitive to these issues. It deployed a road transport improvement program, PATROM, which it has continued to develop over the years.

In 2013, the Africa/Middle East division launched a large number of transporter assessments, carried out by transport professionals, in order to extractcheck safety management in these companies: 273 transporters were audited at year-end 2013, which represented 73% of the area’s transporters. In addition to these audits, five regional agreements were signed among all the transporters to strengthen the sharing of experience, dialogue and exploit fossil fuelsbest practices. Such actions broaden those carried out by the subsidiaries with complex propertieslocal authorities to enhance transport safety and driver training.

At the same time, the Group continues to partner with the World Bank, within the framework of the United Nations resolution on the decade of action for road safety. NGOs in Kenya, Uganda and Cameroon have been created to bring the stakeholders together. This collaboration, called ARSCI (African Road Safety Corridors Initiatives), has helped share and step up societal actions aimed at reducing road accidents, considered to be a major public health problem.

Studies conducted in partnership with universities have drawn up a map of these roads and identify risk areas to target priority actions. Using this information displayed on the onboard computers of trucks, drivers can take extra care when they cross these identified points and appropriate road signs can also be installed. Awareness-raising caravans were also organized in cooperation with the police during the road safety week on these roads to inform drivers as well as pedestrians about the dangers of the road. A number of events were organized to attract a large audience during these operations. Private partners are gradually drawing up common charters guided by principles that they undertake to defend and adopt, such as joint road safety actions for the community, technical standards for vehicles, driver training and exchanges of information.

In its endeavor to sensitize the most vulnerable of populations, the Group called upon the expertise of GRSP (Global Road Safety Program) in 2012 to launch “safety cubes”, an extensive educational campaign targeting children. This tool, rolled out in schools by the subsidiaries, helps students learn the rules and behaviors to adopt to avoid road hazards in a playful and educational way. The objective is to reach one million children in three years.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.65


Item 4 - Other Matters

Optimizing the Group’s contribution to the socioeconomic development of host communities and countries

While ensuring the competitiveness of operations, the community development approach should give rise to new opportunities, both for the countries in question and to strengthen the positive impact of the operations. Wherever it operates, TOTAL carries a particular responsibility for the socioeconomic development of the communities living near its facilities. This aim is embodied in a variety of ways:

the Group’s commitment to local employment (local content);

educational partnerships for training and education; and

support for the implementation of socioeconomic programs.

i. The Group’s commitment to local content: In Africa, the Group works particularly in favor of the development of the industrial fabric and local content (local production, local personnel in the subsidiaries, pre-qualification of local contractors, development of domestic infrastructures, diversification of the local economy).

In Angola, more than 3 million hours of work have been completed locally as part of the Pazflor project. In cooperation with the educational projects supported by Total E&P Angola, some fifty candidates have been recruited and trained by the national oil institute since 2007 in order to become production operators on the project. For the CLOV project, slated to start production in 2014, more than 10 million hours of work have been completed in Angola. Through CLOV, Total E&P Angola has also trained nearly forty students holding an operator’s diploma, who are now working in the FPSOs in Block 17 in Angola. This is the first time in Angola that a project is conducted with so many local man-hours and with such a high level of production carried out inside the country.

In Nigeria, over 80% of the subsidiary’s employees are locals and more than 100 new local recruits are expected each year. Twenty-eight percent of the construction work to develop Akpo was entrusted to local contractors, which represents approximately 10 million hours worked. For the Egina project, the goal is to complete about 21 million hours of work locally.

In the Congo, Total E&P Congo set up an organization in 2012 dedicated to the development of local content. This department’s task is to expand the use of Congolese enterprises, notably by identifying and assessing local companies likely to become Total E&P Congo’s subcontractors and then by providing them programs to develop their capacities (e.g., managerial, industrial, HSE). An in-depth study to identify the potential to increase the local content in Total E&P Congo revealed business areas where this potential was the highest. To strengthen local capacities in these key areas, the Moho North project instituted a mandatory local content plan with respect to its international contractors, cascaded down to lower-level local contractors. Due to these joint efforts, Total E&P Congo has set the objective of increasing the local content level of its purchasing from its current 22% to 32% by 2022.

For several years, the Marketing & Services segment has organized the “Young Dealers” program in Africa/Middle East, aimed at

promoting young service station employees who have business and managerial skills. The aim is to help employees with potential to eventually become a service station manager. Due to this program, young people unable to provide a guarantee can benefit from a financial loan along with training and substantial technical assistance. A number of them thus have the opportunity to create and succeed in their own business in the distribution of petroleum products. With this management mode, the Group develops skills and boosts the motivation of its service station employees. Out of the 3,500 service stations in Africa/Middle East, 1,300 are managed by young dealers, that is, 29% of TOTAL’s network.

TOTAL’s activities generate hundreds of thousands of direct and indirect jobs worldwide. The Group’s purchasing activities alone represented about31 billion worldwide in 2013. This presents numerous challenges with regard to TOTAL’s impact on the environment, society and community development, all of which the Group takes into account in its relationships with suppliers (see“— Fair operating practices — Contractors and suppliers”, below).

A major component: developing the regional economic fabric in France

Since the 2000s, the participation of local service providers in industrial projects has steadily increased. In addition to the jobs generated by its activities, the Group, as a responsible company, supports small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in France, particularly through “Total Développement Régional” (TDR). The aim of this structure is to promote the creation of SMEs with a view to developing the local economic fabric.

TDR has set up a program to pre-qualify and certify French small and medium-sized companies, in line with the standards required by the Group, in order to work with more local suppliers.

TheTotal Emploi Local (Total Local Employment) initiative has been implemented on the Normandy platform with the following aims, in the context of major investments (exceeding1 billion, aimed at adapting the production facility to market demand and future environmental requirements by improving energy efficiency, safety and reliability):

promote the development of local content by training and professionalizing unqualified people or job-seekers; and

enable local companies to work on TOTAL projects.

TOTAL has thus initiated a partnership approach with all the economic, employment and training, and inspection stakeholders. This innovative initiative has proved to be very encouraging, with nearly 1,200 jobs created in the Le Havre region, more than half under open-ended contracts. Local companies have recruited qualified staff and can thus meet the needs of future projects in the region. Local players in integration, employment and training are equipped with tools and a methodology to anticipate future recruitment and training requirements. Candidates can showcase their aptitudes to future recruiters with their skills passport. TOTAL has thus successfully completed its major projects by entrusting 70% of the services to local companies. This initiative has moreover achieved sustainability, with Le Havre Chamber of Commerce and Industry taking over this project, renamed “Compétences totalement estuaire”.

66TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

TDR can also support planned employment area regeneration schemes alongside the redeployment of the Group’s activities, as illustrated by the reconversion of the Lacq industrial basin.

The support provided forms a major component of TOTAL’s economic and industrial policy and takes a number of forms:

financial backing for the creation, buy-out and expansion of SMEs, and support for regeneration along with local development players;

support for export and international expansion; and

aid for innovative SMEs.

In the last three years, TDR has provided12.5 million in financial assistance for 386 SMEs, supporting 6,964 jobs.

ii. Educational partnerships: TOTAL promotes the internationalization of its management and therefore encourages the recruitment of local personnel and their access to positions of responsibility, particularly within their local subsidiaries. As part of its social programs, the Group therefore offers local and international scholarships to create skilled local workforces for future hiring. Thousands of students are thus given the opportunity to pursue their studies in their country of origin or at the world’s leading universities. TOTAL’s international scholarship program has also enabled over 700 students from thirty countries to study in France for qualifications (bachelor’s degrees, engineering and master’s degrees, MBAs and doctorates).

Moreover, in July 2012, TOTAL signed a partnership agreement with the French Foreign Ministry as part of the program for co-funding international grants known as “Quai d’Orsay — Entreprises”, in addition to the existing partnership. The master-level courses in French universities are open to students from six countries.

With support from other major groups, TOTAL, Paris Tech and the École polytechnique introduced the Renewable Energy Science and Technology Master II postgraduate degree program in the fall of 2011. Forty students from eighteen countries enrolled for this program in the fall of 2013.

TOTAL is particularly active in supporting research chairs in thirty-five establishments, half of which are in France. One of the latest examples is the “Enterprise Architecture” chair at the École Centrale de Lille.

Another of the Group’s flagship initiatives in favor of education was the fourth Total Energy and Education Seminar, which took place in Paris. This seminar is organized every eighteen months and brings together nearly 100 academics from forty countries. The academics and TOTAL managers and external experts discuss issues such as the future of energy, climate change, relationships between universities and businesses, and the impact of globalization on education and human resources management.

The eighth Total Summer School took place in Paris in July 2013, welcoming more than 100 students from thirty countries to debate energy challenges.

The university partnership program launched in Africa in 2010 has been extended to all of Europe, Asia and Middle East. Only the Americas are yet to be covered. Apart from their societal aspects, these partnerships, more than 50 in number at the moment, aim to hone the talents required to achieve the Group’s international ambitions.

In Africa, the Group continues to support the pilot secondary education programs launched in 2008 in the Eiffel (Angola) and

Augagneur (Congo) high schools to provide free, world-class education in regions where educational opportunities are still limited. TOTAL also funds the development of preparatory courses for prestigious universities at the Léon Mba high school in Gabon. In the field of higher education, TOTAL has entered into partnerships with the oil institutes and science faculties in several decades. countries: IST-AC (Congo/Cameroon), Institut du Pétrole et du Gaz (Gabon), University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria).

iii. Supporting the implementation of socioeconomic programs: TOTAL’s contribution to the socioeconomic and human development of the countries where the Group operates is reflected in its involvement in local development programs.

The Group’s expenditure on community development has increased regularly over the last three years:305 million in 2011,316 million in 2012, and357 million in 2013. About 90% of the expenditure on community development is made outside OECD countries. In 2013, around 3,400 community development actions were identified, spread evenly among the business segments (Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services).

These programs support or serve local communities by contributing to their cultural, socioeconomic and human development. These communities are usually impacted by the Group’s presence or activities. These programs fall into three main categories: good citizenship, human and social development, and local economic development.

The importance of partnerships

TOTAL’s approach is moving away from a purely donation-based model to a partnership model. Its commitment should be reflected in long-term partnerships in all the countries where the Group operates. Built on attentive listening, constructive dialogue and the firm determination to forge relationships of trust with the stakeholders, these partnerships with local institutions and organizations guarantee the long-term success of the projects. One of the eight indicators selected by the Group for monitoring its community development performance is therefore the number of actions carried out in partnership.

TOTAL takes care not to substitute the local authorities in all its actions. In this regard, TOTAL teams up with NGOs specializing in social action, which have a solid field experience. These organizations help the Group increase the effectiveness of the socioeconomic development programs it supports, particularly by encouraging it to take into account the entire life cycle of its programs, from the design phase to shutdown.

In Congo, a 2-year partnership agreement was signed in June 2012 with the Fishing and Aquaculture Ministry and the association Renatura to launch the “Fishing Practices Support Program in Congo”. The objectives are to support those involved in fishing, apply regulations in force, suggest alternatives in terms of fishing practices likely to minimize marine turtle by-catch and ensure a better regeneration of fisheries resources.

Moreover, as part of its drive to support the diversification of local economies, in Congo, TOTAL has stepped up its commitment to the Pointe-Noire Industrial Association (APNI), a platform launched in 2000 for developing small and medium-sized companies. APNI offers the services of an Approved Management Center (CGA), which helps SMEs with fiscal monitoring and account keeping. APNI also provides a Market observatory with theme-based conferences (e.g., SMEs and banking, Being a young entrepreneur, Business and energy).

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.67


Item 4 - Other Matters

In Nigeria, TOTAL is committed to foster the local economic development of the Egi region, in the heart of the Niger Delta where it has been operating since 1964. In partnership with local communities, TOTAL has set up the Small & Medium Enterprises-Development Network (SME-DN), a training center that aims to stimulate and sustain entrepreneurship in the region. In 2011, TOTAL sought the technical assistance of the European Institute for Economic Development (IECD) requesting it to implement its methodology of supporting small businesses within SME-DN. Since 2011,SME-DN has hosted three courses, training a total of seventy-seven entrepreneurs in the Egi region. The results are positive: six months after the training, the entrepreneurs increased their turnover (+25% on average), thereby improving their standards of living.

The access to energy program

For more than ten years, certain subsidiaries have been occasionally and independently engaged in various community development projects focusing on access to energy, in three main areas:

the electrification of rural areas that are not connected to the electric power network, thanks to photovoltaic solutions. 20,000 households have been electrified in South Africa using photovoltaic kits, plus a further 25,000 in Morocco;

aid for LPG supplies through the Shesha program in South Africa, in which gas cylinders are sold to the residents of townships in order to improve their security and health; and

the use of associated gases to produce electricity in certain countries where TOTAL’s Exploration & Production has operations. The project developed on OML 58 in Nigeria caters to almost 100,000 people. In Yemen, a project was carried out in cooperation with the state-owned electricity company to supply electricity generated using associated gas to neighboring communities (approximately 500,000 people served). In 2013, a study was conducted to assess the possibility of increasing the capacity. In Congo, TOTAL contributed to the funding of the extension of the electricity network in certain districts of Pointe Noire, supplying electric power to about 10,000 people.

These projects were usually developed in cooperation with the communities neighboring the Group’s sites or as part of programs launched by the authorities in the host countries and sometimes without any goals to achieve economic viability and, therefore, sustainability.

To improve its societal performance and structure its approach, TOTAL aims to develop programs that are both profitable and sustainable. For this reason, the Group has developed “Total Access to Energy”, which proposes energy solutions adapted to underprivileged populations. The Group relies on feedback from experiments conducted in recent years to implement these programs in a social business context, with a view to deploying sustainable energy access solutions that can be reproduced on a large scale.

As of today, Total Access to Energy covers two areas in line with TOTAL’s core business:

the development of photovoltaic solar energy innon-OECD countries (the “Awango by Total” trademark was launched in 2012); and

the fight against fuel poverty in OECD countries (mobility and heating).

i. “Awango by Total” program: This program is in line with a social business strategy: the project’s profitability target ensures its sustainability, while at the same time satisfying certain expectations of host countries, thereby strengthening TOTAL’s presence and making its activities more visible. It also contributes to enabling access to energy for as many people as possible, a mission set by the Group.

At the United Nations Rio Conference in June 2012 (“Rio+20”), TOTAL committed to enabling five million people on low incomes to have access to lighting thanks to reliable photovoltaic products by 2015, while offering a broad selection of services, ranging from after-sales to options for the collection of end-of-life products and recycling.

TOTAL was the leading sponsor of Lighting Africa, the worldwide conference on energy access organized in Dakar in November 2012 by the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation (IFC). At this conference, TOTAL launched its new Awango by Total brand to market a range of products and services that meet the lighting and mobile phone charging needs of people without access to electricity. By the end of 2013, 460,000 solar lamps were sold since the launch of this brand in twelve countries, including Cameroon, Kenya, Senegal, Burkina Faso, Uganda, Nigeria, Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar and Haiti.

The Awango by Total brand is expected to be deployed in five more countries by mid 2014: Tanzania, Zambia, Pakistan, Congo, and Niger. The distribution networks used to market solar solutions are both existing TOTAL networks and so-called “last mile” networks built with local partners with a view to bringing these solutions as close as possible to where people live.

ii. Fighting fuel poverty in OECD countries: The “fuel poverty” project is the Group’s global response to the challenge of access to heating as well as mobility in Europe and in emerging countries. It may be recalled some 15% to 20% of the population in Europe is considered “fuel poor”.

In 2013, the fuel poverty issue sparked off a number of exchanges between all the concerned players (public, private, civil society) all over the Europe area. The challenges have been more or less clearly identified depending on the countries and the solutions implemented focus more on heating/housing than on mobility.

In 2013, TOTAL pursued and expanded its “fuel poverty” project launched in 2012 in France. In the “heating/housing” component, the Group continued pilot projects aimed at testing solutions for the fuel poor at all the links in the chain:

With the associations “PIMMS” and “Unis Cité” for identifying those living in fuel poverty through a project in the French Meurthe et Moselle department.

With “Fondation FACE” for identifying and supporting customers using fuel oil for heating, primarily in peri-urban and rural areas in two French pilot departments: Bas-Rhin and Sarthe.

With the association “Parcours Confiance” to test the relevance of housing micro-credit for carrying out thermal renovation.

As part of the “Living Better” public program, the Group has contributed to 20% of thermal renovations in seventeen French departments carried out at the national level for the fuel poor.

68TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

Between 2011 and year-end 2013, 4,773 thermal renovations were carried out with TOTAL’s support.

At the end of 2013, under an agreement signed with the French Ministry for Sports and Youth, Voluntary Associations and Popular Education, the Group committed to an additional amount of2 million to implement the public program on thermal renovation known as “Habiter Mieux” (Living Better) over two years (end of the program in 2015).

As regards the mobility component, TOTAL’s partnership with the Voiture & Co association helped open two mobility platforms (supply of low-cost vehicles, personalized advice and support, microlending for the purchase of mobility solutions, etc.) in the French Eure andHauts-de-Seine departments. In addition, a nation-wide study was conducted and made public in December 2013 on the challenges faced by those with limited transport facilities in accessing employment. Moreover, the above-mentioned agreement with the French Ministry for Sports and Youth, Voluntary Associations and Popular Education also included a mobility component with an additional2 million to launch a call for projects to identify and support innovative mobility initiatives throughout France.

Partnerships and philanthropy—TOTAL Corporate foundation/TOTAL S.A. philanthropy

In addition to the community development initiatives that are directly related to the Group’s industrial activities, TOTAL has also been committed for many years to taking general-interest measures in the countries where it has operations. At the Head Office, the Group’s philanthropic actions are essentially conducted by the TOTAL Corporate Foundation and by the Philanthropy Department of TOTAL S.A.

Founded in 1992 in the wake of the Rio Earth Summit, the TOTAL Foundation celebrated its twentieth anniversary in 2012. Initially dedicated to the environment and marine biodiversity, the Foundation is now active in four fields: (i) marine biodiversity; (ii) culture and heritage; (iii) health; and (iv) solidarity.

At the end of 2012, TOTAL renewed the commitments of its Foundation for a further five years (2013-2017), with a50 million multi-year action budget.

With regard to the marine biodiversity, the Foundation funds programs aimed at research studies to improve knowledge, protection and enhancement of marine and coastal species and ecosystems. In 2013, the Foundation supported nearly sixty projects (new or ongoing projects). The Foundation continued to support the “Pristine” project whose objective is to redefine the baseline for coral ecosystems in order to assess human impacts in three areas of the Pacific (New Caledonia, Tonga and Polynesia). The project also produced a report on the diversity of the fish identified and the quality of their habitat during the “IMPAC 3” international conference in October 2013 in Marseilles (France).

The Foundation promotes cultural dialogue by supporting exhibitions that showcase the heritage and arts of the Group’s host countries. In 2013, the Group supported twelve exhibitions. A great patron of the Paris-based Arab World Institute, the Foundation has supported the “Golden Age of Arab Sciences” exhibition as well as its tours in Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. In 2013, the exhibition was held at the Abu Dhabi Paris Sorbonne University, providing an opportunity to promote French cultural competence, showcase the cultures of the Mediterranean Basin and Arabian Peninsula, and foster intercultural dialogue. In

France, with the heritage association Fondation du Patrimoine, TOTAL Corporate Foundation also supports the preservation of traditional crafts and industry and the restoration of heritage sites in France.

In the field of health, the Foundation has partnered with Institut Pasteur since 2005. Professor F. Barré-Sinoussi, 2008 Nobel Prize laureate, is the resource person for this partnership, which focuses on the fight against infectious diseases. The Foundation also contributes to research programs and field actions in partnership with the Group’s subsidiaries, mainly in Africa. In 2013, the Foundation supported more than six field projects (new or ongoing projects). After financing the deployment of a program to prevent sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS among truck drivers in Morocco between 2007 and 2011, a similar program was launched in Burkina Faso in 2013.

Finally, the Foundation encourages Group Employees to engage with the community, through support for projects championed by non-profit organizations with which employees volunteer on a personal basis. In 2013, the Foundation supported more than sixty employee projects in thirty-four countries.

The Group has also forged a number of major institutional partnerships in France. In 2009, TOTAL signed an innovative50 million partnership agreement with the French Ministry for Youth to promote the social and professional integration of young people. This led to the financing of over 200 social action projects between 2009 in 2013. In line with this technologypartnership, the Group reaffirmed its commitment by supporting the government-sponsored “Priorité Jeunesse” (Priority to Youth) program.

Since 2008, TOTAL has also partnered with the French Society of Sea Rescuers (SNSM). Through its funding and expertise, the Group plays a role in suchimproving the safety of maritime rescue operations and training volunteers.

For more than twenty years now, TOTAL Corporate Foundation’s ambition has been to foster the development general interest measures, going beyond the Group’s industrial responsibility, by encouraging the convergence of expertise and innovation.

Fair operating practices

i. Preventing corruption: The amounts of money involved and the diversity of the various regions require the oil industry to be particularly vigilant about corruption and fraud. Around one quarter of TOTAL’s employees work in countries considered to be high-risk in this regard (countries in which the Transparency International index of the perception of corruption is less than or equal to fifty). Preventing corruption and fraud is therefore a difficult environment makes cost projections uncertain. major challenge for the Group and all its employees.

TOTAL’s operations can be limited, delayedstance on the issue of corruption is based on clear principles, set out in 2000 in the Code of Conduct:TOTAL rejects bribery and corruption in all forms, whether public or canceled as a resultprivate, active or passive”.

The Code of Conduct sets out the principles governing the actions and individual behavior of each person, both in their day-to-day decisions and in their relations with stakeholders. In it, TOTAL reiterates its support for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the Tenth Principle of the United Nations Global Compact, which urges businesses to work against corruption in all its forms.

The Group’s commitment in this area relies on the principle of “zero tolerance” in matters of corruption and is regularly reiterated

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.69


Item 4 - Other Matters

by TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer particularly to its employees and to stakeholders. This commitment takes the form of a number of factors, including administrative delays,actions:

in 2009, approval by the Executive Committee of a corruption prevention policy and a robust compliance program (e.g., training, communication, due diligence, audits) and the creation of a dedicated compliance structure;

creation of the Compliance and Social Responsibility Department within the Group Legal Department, which is now backed by a network of more than 350 compliance officers in the Holding and the Group’s various business segments; and

in 2011, the Executive Committee’s decision to reinforce the means of preventing fraud and corruption by setting up suitable programs.

This initiative involves actions to raise awareness amongst employees and to train them. Training seminars are organized for all compliance officers, and proposed to any employee exposed to the risk of corruption while performing his or her duties. An e-learning course on the prevention of corruption, available in particulartwelve languages, has been made available internally since 2011. By year-end 2013, more than 45,000 employees had taken the course.

Under the settlements reached in 2013 between TOTAL, the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ), an independent monitor was appointed to conduct a 3-year review of the anti-corruption compliance and related internal control procedures implemented by the Group and to recommend improvements, when necessary. The monitor’s mission started on December 2, 2013.

ii. Human rights: Although the ultimate responsibility for human rights lies with governments, the activities of companies can affect the human rights of the employees, partners or communities with which they interact in numerous ways. In addition to being an ethical commitment for TOTAL, adopting a proactive approach to human rights within the Company is vital for its daily business. This approach helps to establish and maintain successful relationships with all stakeholders.

TOTAL’s Code of Conduct formally recognizes the Group’s support for the principles of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the core conventions of the International Labor Organization, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the principles of the United Nations Global Compact. Between 2005 and 2011, the Group took part in the consultations organized by the United Nations’ special representative, Professor John Ruggie, on the issue of business and human rights. The Group’s Chairman and Chief Executive and the General Counsel expressed their support for the “protect, respect, remedy” framework and for the UN’s guiding principles on business and human rights.

Furthermore, the Group is actively involved in numerous initiatives and working groups on human rights that bring together various stakeholders. As part of the Global Compact, TOTAL takes part in the Human Rights Working Group, the Expert Group on Responsible Business in Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas and the Anti-Corruption Working Group. Created in 2010, Global Compact LEAD (Initiative for Sustainable Leadership) has fifty-four members, among which TOTAL is the first French company. The Group is also a founding member of the Global Business Initiative on Human Rights and takes part actively in the work of IPIECA,

through the following working groups: Social Responsibility Working Group, Human Rights Task Force, and Responsible Security workshop. Moreover, after having implemented the recommendations of the Voluntary principles on security and human rights (VPSHR) for several years, TOTAL joined this initiative in March 2012. Lastly, since 2012, TOTAL has taken part in the activities of the NGO Shift, created by Professor John Ruggie after his term of office with the UN. TOTAL’s General Counsel took part in various workshops organized by Shift in Boston (USA) on the practical implementation of respect for human rights by companies.

Internally, the Executive Committee adopted a roadmap in 2013 for the period 2013-2015, with the view of strengthening TOTAL’s compliance with human rights standards in its operations and risk management systems, particularly in sensitive countries where the Group operates. This roadmap is implemented in the various departments and entities concerned by these issues (Sustainable Development, Legal, Ethics, Security, Purchasing, Human resources, Training and Audit Departments).

Moreover, in order to spell out its human rights position and initiatives, TOTAL has created a Human Rights Coordination Committee, managed by the Ethics Committee Chairman. A discussion forum that meets three or four times a year, its members include representatives of the Human Resources, Public Relations, Legal, Finance, Security, Purchasing and Sustainable Development Departments. The Committee coordinates the initiatives taken by the Group’s various business units. During these meetings, the participants share their feedback and information on human rights, and particularly on TOTAL’s involvement in public or private international initiatives (e.g., VPSHR, EITI, GBI, IPIECA), on human rights tools developed internally or externally, on procedures and internal policies already adopted or under construction, and on civil society projects.

Linked to the United Nations’ guiding principles on business and human rights, TOTAL’s human rights approach is based on several pillars:

Written principles: in accordance with its Code of Conduct, the Group has adopted principles appropriate to the operations and countries where it works, some of which are set out in the Human Rights Internal Guide published in 2011 in English, French, Spanish and Chinese.

Awareness actions: to ensure that its human rights principles are disseminated in-house, TOTAL raises employee awareness via corporate communications channels such as the Ethics and Security intranet sites, and through specific training programs tailored to the various challenges encountered in the field. These programs are listed in the TOTAL University’s Ethical, Environmental and Social Responsibilities catalogues. For example, a new training program called “Responsible Leadership for a sustainable business” targeting the management was created in 2013. The Group has also developed, in collaboration with the NGO Shift, a series of four awareness-raising videos on the Group’s human rights standards. These videos highlight three key topics that the Group has identified: Voluntary principles on security and human rights (VPSHR); prevention of societal impacts on local communities; and working conditions, both of TOTAL’s employees and in its supply chain. Further, in one of these videos,

70TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Professor John Ruggie discuss TOTAL’s roadmap on human rights, as well as the importance of complying with the Group’s human rights standards in daily activities.

Listening and advice bodies: two dedicated bodies, the Ethics Committee and the Compliance and Social Responsibility Department, are available to advise employees and coordinate efforts to promote human rights. All employees experiencing difficulties in the practical implementation of the Code of Conduct should turn first to their line manager; if necessary, they can contact the Human Resources Department or take their concerns to the Ethics Committee.

The Ethics Committee is a central, independent structure that represents all of TOTAL’s business units. Its role is to listen to, support and advise both employees and people outside the Group. The Committee maintains complete confidentiality with regard to referrals; this can only be lifted with the agreement of the person in question.

Assessment tools: these are used to regularly assess the subsidiaries’ human rights practices and the risks they face. They analyze the local consequences of projects (societal audits in which local communities in certain countries are questioned on their perception of the impact of the Group’s activities on their everyday lives) or check that the subsidiaries’ ethical practices meet the Group’s standards. Most of these tools are designed to prevent or limit the ethical risks or impacts related to the Group’s activities. Some of them are used with the assistance of independent experts, such as GoodCorporation, the Danish Institute for Human Rights or the CDA Collaborative Learning Projects. Action and monitoring plans are then implemented on the basis of these assessments.

iii. Contractors and suppliers: In its Code of Conduct, TOTAL states that it expects its suppliers to respect equivalent principles to which it abides. A document entitled “Fundamental Principles in Purchasing” sets out the commitments that the Group expects of its suppliers with regard to respecting fundamental rights at work, protecting health and the environment, preventing corruption, complying with the rules of free competition and promoting economic and social development. The rules set out in this document may be made available to TOTAL suppliers in order to obtain a contractual commitment that they will comply with them. In some contracts, such as those covering the oil operations of the Exploration & Production segment, the principles contained in TOTAL’s Code of Conduct (e.g., preventing corruption, health, environment, security, safety, societal, right to work) are covered by specific contract clauses.

Questionnaires focused on environmental and social challenges are used to gather more in-depth information from suppliers about their approach to these subjects, either during pre-qualification or as part of an audit. This aspect of supplier relationships can also be examined in ad hoc ethical assessments of Group’s subsidiaries or entities performed by GoodCorporation. With the host states’ approval processes for development projects, shortages, late deliverydeployment of equipmentthe anti-corruption policy in 2013, specific questionnaires were sent to a certain number of suppliers and weather conditions, includingin some cases, external audits were carried out.

A cross-functional working group dedicated to sustainable purchasing, which includes the riskvarious segments and the Purchasing and Sustainable Development departments, has been active since

2011. This group is tasked with reinforcing TOTAL’s policy in this area by using the initiatives taken in each segment. In 2012, a map of hurricanesthe CSR risks and opportunities in the Gulf of Mexico. Some of these risks may also affect TOTAL’s projectsGroup’s main purchasing categories was created in order to identify the main issues in three areas: ethics and facilities further down the oil and gas chain.

Economic or political factors

The oil sector is subject to domestic regulationshuman rights, environmental impact, and the interventioncreation of governments,value with the communities. Pilot projects were implemented in certain categories in order to concretely integrate the monitoring of CSR aspects into the purchasing process (e.g., specific questionnaire focusing on the fundamental procurement principles, drafting of suitable contract clauses, good practices guide for purchases from the sheltered sector).

In February 2013, the Group Purchasing Committee decided to focus on awareness-raising and training on sustainable purchasing, and to develop the integration of sustainable purchasing targets in the annual interviews of buyers (initially central buyers). Seven sustainable purchasing training sessions were organized in 2013 in France and will continue to be offered in 2014. Concrete tools have been developed to support this training and are used in pre- and post-learning: fact sheets on international references (for example, principles of the International Labour Organization); country fact sheets (specifying aspects of local law); internal feedback; and methodology sheets (e.g., total cost of ownership, life cycle analysis, eco-labels).

In France, purchases from the sector for disabled workers continued to rise with the signature of new contracts; Group purchases from the sector for disabled workers tripled, in terms of recipient entities, for the Group’s three main sites at the Head Office in Paris between 2012 and 2013.

In March 2014, TOTAL received the “Responsible supplier relationships” label for its Holding and Marketing & Services activities in France. This label, awarded by the French authorities, recognizes companies that maintain sustainable and balanced relationships with their suppliers.

Reporting scopes and method for social and environmental information

Reporting guidance

The Group reporting procedures consist of:

for social indicators, a practical handbook titled “Corporate Social Reporting Protocol and Method”;

for Industrial Safety indicators, the Corporate Guidance on Event and Statistical Reporting; and

for environmental indicators, a Group reporting procedure, together with specific instructions for the sectors.

Scopes

In 2013, environmental reporting covered all activities, sites and industrial assets in which TOTAL, directly or through state-owned companies,one of its subsidiaries, is the operator (either operates or contractually manages the operations) as of December 31, 2013. Equity greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are the only data which are published on the “equity” perimeter. This perimeter, which is different from the “operated domain” mentioned above, includes all the assets in such areas as:which TOTAL has a financial interest with rights over all or part of the production (financial interest without operational responsibility nor rights on all or part of the production do not lead to the incorporation of GHG emissions).

Safety reporting covers all TOTAL employees, as well as employees of contractors working at Group-operated sites. Each

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.71


Item 4 - Other Matters

 

the award of exploration and production interests;

authorizations by governments or by a state-controlled partner, in particular for development projects, annual programs or the selection of contractors or suppliers;

the imposition of specific drilling obligations;

environmental protection controls;

control over the development, exploitation and abandonment of a field causing restrictions on production;

calculating the costs that may be recovered fromsite submits its safety reporting to the relevant authoritybusiness unit. The data is then consolidated at the business level and what expendituresevery month at the Corporate level. In 2013, the Group safety reporting scope covered 528 million hours worked, equivalent to around 310,000 people.

The occupational diseases reporting covers the Group personnel and diseases are deductible from taxes;

cases of expropriation, nationalization or reconsideration of contractual rights.

The oil industry is also subjectreported according to the paymentregulation applicable in the country of royaltiesoperation of each entity. Each site sends its reporting on occupational diseases to the operational entity it reports to. Statistics are consolidated at sector level and taxes,reported to the Group once a year.

Social reporting is based on two resources – the Global Workforce Analysis and the Worldwide Human Resources Survey. The Global Workforce Analysis is conducted twice a year, on June 30 and December 31, in all fully consolidated companies owned 50% or more and consolidated by global integration included in this Annual Report. The survey mainly covers worldwide workforces, hiring under permanent and fixed-term contracts (non-French equivalents ofcontrats à durée déterminée ou indéterminée), nationality, and employee hires and departures. This survey produces a breakdown of the workforce by gender, category (managers and other employees), age and nationality.

The Worldwide Human Resources Survey is an annual survey which may be higher thancomprises approximately 100 indicators in addition to those applicable to other commercialused in the Global Workforce Analysis. The indicators are selected in cooperation with the businesses and which may be subject to material changes by the governments of certain countries.

Substantial portions of TOTAL’s oil and gas reserves are located in certain countries that may be considered as politically and economically unstable. Such oil and gas reserves and related operations are subject to certain additional risks, including:

the implementation of production and export quotas;

the compulsory renegotiation of contracts;

the expropriation or nationalization of assets;

risks related to changes of local governments or the resulting changes in business customs and practices;

payment delays;

currency exchange restrictions;

depreciation of assets due to the devaluation of local currencies or other measures taken by governments that might have a significant impact on the value of activities; and

losses and decreased activity due to armed conflicts, civil unrest, the actions of terrorist groups or sanctions that target activities or parties of certain countries.

TOTAL, like othercover major international oil companies, has a geographically diverse portfolio of reserves and operational sites, which allows it to conduct its business and financial affairs so as to reduce its exposure to such political and economic risks. However, there can be no assurance that such events will not adversely affect the Group.

Business Activities in Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria

Provided in this section is certain information relating to TOTAL’s activities in Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria.

For more information on U.S. and EU restrictions relevant to our activities in these jurisdictions, see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk Factors”.

Cuba

In 2011, TOTAL’s Refining & Marketing division had limited marketing activities for the sale of specialty products to non-state entities in Cuba and paid taxes on such activities. In addition, TOTAL’s Trading & Shipping division purchased hydrocarbons pursuant to spot contracts from a state-controlled entity for approximately40 million.

Iran

TOTAL’s Exploration & Production division historically had been active in Iran through buyback contracts. Under such contracts, the contractor is responsible for and finances development operations. Once development is completed, operations are handed over to the national oil company, which then operates the field. The contractor receives payments in cash or in kind to recover its expenditures as

well as a remuneration based on the field’s performance. Furthermore, upon the national oil company’s request, a technical services agreement may be implemented in conjunction with a buyback contract to provide qualified personnel and services until full repayment of all amounts due to the contractor.

TOTAL entered into such buyback contracts between 1995 and 1999 with respect to the development of four fields: Sirri, South Pars 2 & 3, Balal and Dorood. For all of these contracts, development operations have been completed and TOTAL retains no operational responsibilities. A technical services agreement for the Dorood field expired in December 2010. As TOTAL is no longer involved in the operation of these fields, TOTAL has no information on the production from these fields. Some payments are yet to be reimbursed to TOTAL with respect to South Pars 2 & 3, Balal and Dorood. Since 2011, TOTAL has no production in Iran corresponding to such payments in kind, compared to 2 kboe/d in 2010 and 8 kboe/d in 2009. No royalties or fees are paid by the Group in connection with these buyback and service contracts. In 2011, TOTAL made non-material payments to the Iranian administration with respect to certain taxes and social security.

With respect to TOTAL’s Refining & Marketing division’s 2011 activities in Iran, Beh Total, a company held 50/50 by Behran Oil and Total Outre-Mer, a subsidiarycomponents of the Group producedHuman Resources policy, such as mobility, career management, training, employee dialogue, Code of Conduct application, health, compensation, retirement benefits and marketed small quantities of lubricants (20,000 tons) for sale to domestic consumers in Iran. In 2011, revenue generated from Beh Total’s activities was43.5 million and cash flow was4.6 million. Beh Total paid approximately1 million in taxes. TOTAL does not own or operate any refineries or chemicals plants in Iran. In 2011, Beh Total paid5.6 million of dividends for fiscal year 2010 (share of TOTAL:2.3 million).

In 2011, TOTAL’s Trading & Shipping division purchased in Iran pursuant toinsurance. The survey covers a mix of spot and term contracts approximately forty-nine million barrels of hydrocarbons from state-controlled entities for approximately3.7 billion. Prior to January 23, 2012, TOTAL’s Trading & Shipping division ceased its purchase of Iranian hydrocarbons.

Sudan

Since the independencerepresentative sample of the Republicconsolidated perimeter. The data published in this Annual Report are extracted from the most recent survey, carried out in December 2013 and January 2014; 149 companies representing 90% of South Sudan on July 9, 2011, TOTAL is not presentthe consolidated Group workforce, operating in Sudan. TOTAL holds an interest in Block B in what was, prior to July 9, 2011, the southern region of Sudan.

TOTAL disbursed in Sudan between January 1, 2011 and July 8, 2011, approximately $0.7 million as scholarships and social development contributions, as well as contributions58 countries, replied to the construction of social infrastructure,

schools and water wells along with non-governmental organizations and other stakeholders involved in southern Sudan.

For moresurvey. Both surveys are conducted using the same information on TOTAL’s activities in the Republic of South Sudan, see “Item 4. Business Overview — Republic of South Sudan”.

Syria

In 2011, TOTAL had two contracts relating to oil and gas exploration & production activities: a Production Sharing Agreement entered into in 1988 (“PSA 1988”) for an initial period of twenty years and renewedsystem introduced at the end of 20082003, and undergo similar internal control and validation processes.

Consolidation method: In the scopes defined above, industrial safety and social data are fully consolidated. Environmental indicators consolidate 100% of the emissions of Group operated sites for the “operated” indicators. GHG are also published in equity share, that is the consolidation of the Group part of emissions for all assets in which the Group has a financial interest or rights to production.

Changes in scope: For social and environmental indicators, the indicators are calculated on the basis of the perimeter of the Group as of December 31, 2013. For safety indicators, acquisitions are taken into account as soon as possible and at the latest on January 1 of the following year, and divestments are taken into account at the end of quarter preceding their effective date of implementation. Restatement of previous years published data, unless there is a specific statement, is now limited to changes of methodology.

Principles

Indicator selection and relevance: The data published in the Registration Document are intended to inform stakeholders about TOTAL’s Corporate Social

Responsibility performance for the year in question. The environmental indicators include Corporate performance indicators in line with the IPIECA reporting guidance, updated in 2010. The indicators have been selected in order to track:

¡

TOTAL’s commitments and policies, and their effects in the domains of safety, environment, social, etc.);

¡

performance relative to TOTAL’s principal challenges and impacts; and

¡

information required by legislative and regulatory obligations (article L. 225-102-1 of the French Commercial Law, such as modified in 2010 by article 225 of the Grenelle II law).

Terminology used in social reporting: Outside of France, management staff (cadre) refers to any employee whose job level is the equivalent of 300 or more Hay points. Permanent contracts correspond tocontrats à durée indéterminée (CDI) and fixed-term contracts tocontrats à durée determinée (CDD), according to the terminology used in the social reporting.

Managed Scope: all subsidiaries in which one or more Group companies own a stake of 50% or more,i.e., 496 companies in 124 countries as of December 31, 2013.

Consolidated Scope: all subsidiaries fully consolidated as in the Registration Document,i.e., 355 companies in 101 countries as of December 31, 2013.

Methods: The methods may be adjusted to reflect the diversity of TOTAL’s activities, recent integration of subsidiaries, lack of regulations or standardized international definitions, practical procedures for collecting data, or changes in methods.

Consolidation and internal controls: Environmental, social and Industrial Safety data are consolidated and checked by each business unit and business segment, and then at Corporate level. Data pertaining to certain specific indicators are calculated directly by the business segments. These processes undergo regular internal audits.

Details of certain environmental indicators

Personnel in charge of the environment: it is a matter of identifying the persons in charge of the environment in the HSE departments of the sites, and if any, the staff of research centers working on this theme, the laboratories of sites (for environmental analysis), effluent liquid and gaseous emission processing departments, the department responsible for the management (and possibly internal processing) of waste, departments and entities charged with rehabilitation of sites.

ISO sites: sites covered by an ISO 14001 certificate that is valid, some certificates covering several sites.

Fresh water: water with salinity below 1.5 g/l.

Hydrocarbon spills: spills with a volume greater than 1 b (159 l) are counted. These are accidental spills of which at least part of the volume spilt reaches the natural environment (including nonwaterproof ground). Spills resulting from sabotage or malicious acts are included. Spills which remain in a confined watertight containment system are excluded.

Waste: the contaminated soil excavated and removed from active sites to be treated externally is counted as

72TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

waste. But drilling debris, mining cuttings or soil polluted in inactive sites are not counted as waste.

GHG: the six gases of the Kyoto protocol are counted, which are CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6, with their respective GWP (Global Warming Potential) as described by the 1995 GIEC report.

GHG Scope 2: the emission factors applied are world averages: 3.2 Mt CO2-eq/Mtep for steam and 0.4 t CO2-eq/MWh for electricity. This reporting is only applicable to the operated perimeter.

GHG in equity share: GHG emissions of non-significant assets are excluded for which the Group equity share is less than 10% and for which emissions in Group share are less than 50 kt CO2-eq/year. TOTAL relies on the information provided by its partners who operate its non-operated assets. In cases where this information is not available, estimates are made based on past data, budget data or bypro rata with similar assets.

Material loss rate: this rate corresponds to the net sum of materials extracted or consumed which are neither auto-consumed energy nor sold to a client, divided by the sum of transformed material. In the case of Exploration & Production, this rate is calculated by the ratio of the sum of identified losses to the sum of extracted materials. Petrochemicals considers that this new indicator is not yet sufficiently reliable to be published.

Oil spill preparedness:

¡

An oil spill scenario is deemed “important” as soon as its consequences are on a small scale and with limited impacts on the environment (orders of magnitude of several hundred meters of beaches impacted, and several tons of hydrocarbons, typically).

¡

An oil spill preparedness plan is deemed operational if it describes the alert mechanisms, if it is based on pollution scenarios that stem from the risk analyses and if it describes mitigation strategies that are adapted to each scenario, if it defines the technical and organizational means, internal and external, to be implemented and, lastly, if it mentions elements to be taken into account to implement a follow-up of the environmental impacts of the pollution.

¡

Oil spill preparedness exercise: only exercises conducted on the basis of one of the scenarios identified in the oil spill preparedness plan and which are played out until the stage of deployment of equipment are counted for this indicator.

Research & Development

Certain R&D initiatives of the Group are set forth below. For additional 10-year period,information on the Group’s R&D, see “Item 5. Research and Development”.

Upstream segment

Exploration & Production:In addition to continuously optimizing the development of deep-offshore projects and gas resources, TOTAL continues to improve its computing, exploration, seismic acquisition and processing tools over the long term as well as those for the initial appraisal of hydrocarbon reservoirs and simulation of field evolution during operations, especially for tight, very deep or carbonated reservoirs.

R&D activity has been intensified in the field of unconventional resources, with a strong focus on water management throughout the production cycle and the Tabiyeh Gas Project risked Service Contract (the “Tabiyeh contract”) effectivesearch for alternatives to hydraulic fracking.

A new direction is being taken to carry out deep offshore operations in even deeper waters, on the one hand, and at greater distances for multiphase production transport, on the other hand, which is fully in line with the ambitious goals of Exploration & Production and supports major technology-intensive assets such as Libra in Brazil.

Enhancing oil recovery from mature reservoirs and recovery of heavy oil and bitumen with lesser environmental impacts are also subjects involving very active research. In particular, new technologies for the exploitation of oil shales by pyrolysis are being developed, bothin situ andex situ.

The oxycombustion CO2 capture and storage project in the depleted Rousse reservoir in Lacq (France) is now in the monitoring phase following the injection phase, which ended in April 2013. The Group now has a strong command of the methods used to characterize reservoirs for this type of injection. New projects will look into new and more economical capturing solutions.

Finally, water management and the production of hydrocarbons are still the subject of increased R&D activities. This subject is now part of a larger program dedicated to acceptability.

Gas & Power:The program to develop new LNG solutions is continuing.

Refining & Chemicals segment

Refining & Chemicals:The aim of R&D is to support the medium and long-term development of Refining & Chemicals. In doing so, it contributes to the technological differentiation of this business through the development, implementation and promotion of effective R&D programs that pave the way for the industrialization of knowledge, processes and technologies.

In line with the Refining & Chemicals strategy, R&D places special emphasis on the following four major challenges: take advantage of different types of feedstock, optimize the value of assets, continue to develop innovative products, and develop bio-sourced products. The medium-term strategy of the project portfolio and its deployment plan will facilitate Refining & Chemicals’ technological differentiation.

To take advantage of different types of feedstock, R&D activities related to the processing of more diversified crudes have increased significantly through a better understanding of the effect that feedstocks have on equipment and processes at the molecular level. R&D is launching ambitious new programs to develop various technologies for producing liquid fuels, monomers and intermediates from gas.

R&D is developing know-how and technologies with a view to optimizing the value of assets. Its efforts mainly involve programs focusing on the flexibility and availability of facilities. Advanced modeling of feedstocks and processes helps the units overcome their processing-related constraints and operate in real time with these constraints

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.73


Item 4 - Other Matters

in mind. Research conducted on catalysts is helping to increase their resistance to poisons, improve catalytic stability and extend cycle time at a lower cost. Programs are being set up to maximize the value of heavy residues.

In response to concerns related to social and environmental acceptability, R&D focuses its efforts on reducing emissions, with the aim of ensuring that the facilities’ environmental impact is limited. In anticipation of problems that arise over the long term and the value of CO2, R&D is developing technologies to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of carbon capture and conversion.

Product innovation is a key aspect of research on polymers. R&D draws on its knowledge of metallocenes and bimodality to develop different types of mass consumption polymers which have exceptional properties that allow them to replace heavier materials and compete with technical polymers. Value-added niche polymers are also being developed, whether in the form of blends, compounds or composites. Efforts to diversify into “green” products are focused mainly on bioproducts endorsed by the market: biomonomers, biointermediates and biopolymers. R&D is banking on polylactic acid for the market launch of new polymers that boast improved properties. In addition, the development of blends, compounds and composites broadens the scope of application of polylactic acid-based polymers.

With regard to biofuels, R&D has focused its efforts on gasification and coprocessing to produce liquid fuels from biomass. R&D is also particularly mindful of issues related to blends and product quality raised by the use of biomolecules.

The efficient use of resources and the management of plastics at the end of October 2009. TOTAL owns 100%their useful life are topics of growing interest. R&D is therefore developing technologies that enable plastics to be used more efficiently as feedstock.

Specialty Chemicals:R&D has strategic importance for the Specialty Chemicals. It is closely linked to the needs of subsidiaries and industrial customers.

Hutchinson’s R&D is built around two key areas: materials, with the development of next-generation thermoplastic alloys and high-performance rubber formulas, as efforts to protect the environment create new opportunities; and a shift from products to systems, based on advanced functions such as thermal and acoustic management.

Bostik is focusing its research activities on three technology platforms: hot-melt adhesives, reactive elastomers and hydraulic polymer-binder systems. Based on these technologies, R&D is developing practical, sustainable assembly solutions that meet the needs of markets in terms of energy efficiency (construction, transport), material efficiency (health, industry) and environmental impacts throughout their life cycle.

Atotech is one of the rightsworld leaders for integrated production systems (chemicals, equipment, know-how and obligations under PSA 1988,service) for industrial surface finishing and operated until early December 2011the manufacturing of integrated circuits. Given the environmental challenges related to electroplating, nearly half of Atotech’s R&D projects are intended to develop

cleaner technologies and create conditions for the Sustainable Development of these industries.

Marketing & Services segment

Marketing & Services: In 2013, in response to the roadmap and the new scope of Marketing & Services, R&D reorganized its business areas. In anticipation of changes in technologies, the main lines of research involve the design of new higher-quality,high-performance products to support the international development of the businesses: fuel economy (fuels, lubricants, additives), energy efficiency (bitumen), anticipation of regulatory changes (marine lubricants) and blending of bio-sourced molecules (aviation fuels and special fluids).

The development of the future range of Excellium fuels, which focus mainly on various oil fieldsfuel economy and “engine” cleanliness, has made it possible to validate and integrate new molecules (friction modifier/anti-lacquering) as well as a new detergent technology developed in-house.

The Fuel Eco lubricant range was expanded with many new products added to comply with the specifications of manufacturers targeted by the Total Lubrifiants business line. New marine lubricants for two-stroke engines are being developed to anticipate changes in fuel (very low sulfur rate in coastal areas) and emissions requirements.

To meet energy efficiency requirements by reducing application temperatures, a new bitumen has been developed and released on the European market. The formulation of a sulfur-free specialty bitumen, aimed at reducing users’ exposure to H2S, is continuing.

New formulations of broader spectrum cold flow properties additives that include an exclusive booster for distillates have been developed and are being sold. The multi-partner CAER (alternative aviation fuels) project certified by the Directorate General for Aviation has been launched. The aim of this project is to understand the behavior of new components, from upstream logistics to downstream turbojet operation.

The conditions related to the hydroprocessing of local feedstocks were determined based on future special fluids production units and the initial tests on renewable feedstock pilot programs.

Finally, researchers have also demonstrated their know-how and expertise in the Deir Ez Zor area throughcompetitive arena by developing brand new products (fuels and lubricants for racing teams that were again world champions in 2013), products and technologies that are later adapted to consumer products.

New Energies:R&D efforts in New Energies cover both the production processes of SunPower cells, which aim to speed up the reduction of production costs, and the future generations of photovoltaic cells, as part of several partnerships with recognized academic research institutes and start-ups. In particular, TOTAL is a partner in the important institutional project, IPVF, launched by the Université Paris-Saclay.

Energy production from biomass is the other major R&D challenge in the development of New Energies. Through

74TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

its own biotechnology research team, the Group is taking part in a dedicated non-profit operating company owned equally byprogram to develop several production processes using biomass, and in biotechnological projects to transform the biomass into advanced biofuels or molecules that can be used in chemical applications. The Group’s main partnership is with Amyris, in which the Group holds a stake.

Environment

Environmental issues are important throughout the Group and the state-owned General Petroleum Corporation (“GPC”) (the successorare taken into account in all R&D projects. R&D’s effort is to the Syrian Petroleum Company).ensure optimum management of environmental risk, particularly as regards:

The main terms of PSA 1988 are similar to those normally used in the oil and gas industry. The Group’s revenues derived from PSA 1988 are made up of a combination of “cost oil” and “profit oil”. “Cost oil” represents the reimbursement of operating and capital expenditures and is accounted for in accordance with normal industry practices. The Group’s share of “profit oil” depends on the total annual production level. TOTAL receives its revenues in cash payments made by GPC. TOTAL pays to the state-owned Syrian company SCOT a transportation fee equal to $2/b for the oil produced in the area, as well as non-material payments to the Syrian government related to PSA 1988 for such items as withholding taxes and Syrian social security.

The Tabiyeh contract, signed with GPC, may be considered as an addition to PSA 1988 as production, costs and revenues for the oil and part of the condensates coming from the Tabiyeh field are governed by the contractual terms of PSA 1988. This project is designed to enhance liquids and gas output from the Tabiyeh field through the drilling of “commingled” wells and through process modifications in Deir Ez Zor Gas Plant operated by the Syrian Gas Company. Until early December 2011, TOTAL financed and implemented the Tabiyeh Gas Project and operated the Tabiyeh field.

In 2011, technical production for PSA 1988 and the Tabiyeh contract taken together amounted to 63 kboe/d, of which 53 kboe/d were accounted for as the Group’s

share of production. The amount identified as technical production under the agreements, minus the amount accounted for as the Group’s share of production, does not constitute the total economic benefit accruing to Syria under the terms of the agreements since Syria retains a margin on a portion of the Group’s production and receives certain production taxes.

In addition, TOTAL and GPC entered into a Cooperation Framework Agreement in 2009, which provides for the co-development of oil projects in Syria.

Since early December 2011, TOTAL has ceased its activities that contribute to oil and gas production in Syria.

In 2011, TOTAL’s Trading & Shipping division purchased in Syria pursuant to a mix of spot and term contracts nearly eleven million barrels of hydrocarbons from state-controlled entities for approximately824 million. Since early September 2011, the Group has ceased to purchase hydrocarbons from Syria.

Competition

TOTAL is subject to competition from other oil companies in the acquisition of assets and licenses for the exploration and production of oil and natural gas as well as for the sale of manufactured products based on crude and refined oil. TOTAL’s competitors are comprised of national oil companies and international oil companies.

In this regard, the major international oil companies in competition with TOTAL are ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron and BP. As of December 31, 2011, TOTAL ranked fifth among these companies in terms of market capitalization.(1)

water management, notably by reducing the use of water from natural continental environments and by lowering emissions in compliance with local, national and international regulations;

reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by improving energy efficiency and the monitoring of carbon capture and storage and the potential effects of CO2 on the natural environment;

detection and reduction of emissions into the air and simulation of their dissemination;

prevention of soil contamination and regulatory compliance with regard to historical aspects and the rehabilitation of sites;

changes in the Group’s different products and management of their life cycle, in particular in compliance with the REACH Directive.

Insurance and risk management

Organization

TOTAL has its own insurance and reinsurance company, Omnium Insurance and Reinsurance Company (OIRC)(“ORC”). OIRCORC is integrated withwithin the Group’s insurance management and is used as a centralized global operations tool for covering the Group’sGroup companies’ insurable risks. It allows the Group’s worldwide insurance program to be implemented in compliance with the specific requirements of local regulations applicable in the countries where the Group operates.

Some countries may require the purchase of insurance from a local insurance company. If the local insurer accepts to cover the subsidiary of the Group in compliance with its worldwide insurance program, OIRC requestsORC negotiates a retrocession of the covered risks from the local insurer. As

(1)Source: Reuters.

a result, OIRC negotiatesORC enters into reinsurance contracts with the subsidiaries’ local insurance companies, which transfer most of the risk to OIRC. When a local insurer covers the risks at a lower level than that defined by the Group, OIRC provides additional coverage so as to standardize coverage throughout the Group.ORC.

At the same time, OIRCORC negotiates a reinsurance program at the Group level with oil industry mutual insurance companies for the oil industry and commercial reinsurers. OIRC permitsreinsurance markets. ORC allows the Group to better manage price variations in the insurance market by taking on a greater or lesser amount of risk corresponding to the price trends in the insurance market.

In 2011,2013, the net amount of risk retained by OIRCORC after reinsurance was a maximum of $75$54 million per onshore third-party liability insurance claim, $87 million per offshore third-party liability insurance claim and $75 million per property damage and/or business interruption insurance claim. Accordingly, in the event of any loss giving rise to an aggregate insurance claim, the effect on OIRCORC would be limited to its maximum retention of $150$162 million per event.occurrence.

Risk and insurance management policy

In this context, the Group risk and insurance management policy is to work with the relevant internal department of each subsidiary to:

 

define scenarios of major disaster risks (estimated maximum loss);

assess the potential financial impact on the Group should a catastrophic event occur;

help to implement measures to limit the probability that a catastrophic event occurs and the financial consequences if such event should occur; and

manage the level of risk from such events to be either covered internally by the Group or transferred to the insurance market.

define scenarios of major disaster risks (estimated maximum loss);

assess the potential financial impact on the Group should a catastrophic event occur;

help to implement measures to limit the probability that a catastrophic event occurs and the financial consequences if such event should occur; and

manage the level of risk from such events to be either covered internally by the Group or transferred to the insurance market.

Insurance policy

The Group has worldwide property insurance and third-party liability and property insurance coverage for all its subsidiaries. These programs are contracted with first-class insurers (or reinsurers and oil and gas industry mutual insurance companies of the oil industry through OIRC)ORC).

The amounts insured depend on the financial risks defined in the disaster scenarios and the coverage terms offered by the market (available capacities and price conditions).

More specifically for:

 

Third-party liability insurance: since the maximum financial risk cannot be evaluated by a systematic approach, the amounts insured are based on market conditions and industry practice, in particular, the oil industry. In 2011, the Group’s third-party liability

  

Third-party liability insurance: since the maximum financial risk cannot be evaluated by a systematic approach, the amounts insured are based on market conditions and oil and gas industry practice. In 2013, the Group’s third-party liability insurance for any liability (including potential accidental environmental liabilities) was capped at $850 million.million (onshore) and $750 million (offshore).

Property damage and business interruption: the amounts insured vary by sector and by site and are based on the estimated cost of and reconstruction under maximum loss scenarios and on insurance market conditions. The Group subscribed for business interruption coverage in 2011 for its main refining and petrochemical sites.

Property damage and business interruption: the amounts insured vary by sector and by site and are based on the estimated cost of and scenarios of reconstruction under maximum loss scenarios and on insurance market conditions. The Group subscribed for business interruption coverage in 2013 for its main refining and petrochemical sites.

For example, for the Group’s highest risks (platforms in the North(North Sea platforms and main refineries and petrochemical plants in Europe)plants), in 20112013 the Group’sinsurance limit for the Group share of insurance limitthe installations was approximately $1.65$1.7 billion for the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals segment and approximately $1.5$1.6 billion dollars for the Upstream segment.

Deductibles for property damage and third-party liability fluctuate between0.1 million and10 million depending on the level of risk and liability, and are borne by the relevant subsidiary.subsidiaries. For business interruption, coverage beginsis triggered sixty days after the eventoccurrence giving rise to the interruption. In addition, the main refineries and petrochemical plants bear a combined retention for property damage and business interruption of $50 million per insurance claim.

Other insurance contracts are bought by the Group in addition to property damage and third-party liability coverage, mainly for car fleets, credit insurance and employee benefits. These risks are entirelymostly underwritten by outside insurance companies.

The above-described policy is given as an example of past practice over a certain periodsituation as of timea given date and cannot be considered as representative of future conditions. The Group’s insurance policy may be changed at any time depending on the market conditions, specific circumstances and on management’sthe General Management’s assessment of the risks incurred and the adequacy of their coverage.

While

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.75


Item 4 - Other Matters

Competition

TOTAL’s competitors are comprised of national oil companies and international oil companies. The evolutions of the energy sector have opened the door to new competitors, increased market price volatility and called the viability of long-term contracts into question.

TOTAL believes its insurance coverage is subject to competition from other oil companies in line with industry practicethe acquisition of assets and sufficient to cover normal risks in its operations, it is not insured against all possible risks.licenses for the exploration and production of oil and natural gas as well as for the sale of manufactured products based on crude and refined oil. In the event of agas sector, major environmental disaster, for example, TOTAL’s liability may exceed the maximum coverage provided by its third-party liability insurance. The loss TOTAL could sufferproducers are becoming interested in the event of such disaster would depend on all the factsdownstream value chain and circumstances and would be subject to a whole range of uncertainties,are competing directly with established distribution companies, including legal uncertainty asthose that belong to the scopeGroup. Increased competitive pressure could have a significant negative effect on the sales prices, margins and market shares of liability for consequential damages, which may include economic damage not directly connected to the disaster. Group’s companies.

The Group cannot guarantee that it will not suffer any uninsured loss and there can be no guarantee,pursuit of unconventional gas development, particularly in the caseUnited States, has contributed to falling market prices and a marked difference between spot and long-term contract prices. The competitiveness of along-term contracts indexed to oil prices could be affected if this discrepancy persists and if it should prove difficult to invoke price revision clauses.

The major environmental disaster or industrial accident, that such loss would not have a material adverse effect on the Group.international oil companies in competition with TOTAL are ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron and BP. As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL ranked fifth among these companies in terms of market capitalization.(1)

Competition law

Competition laws apply to the Group’s companies in the vast majority of countries in which it does business. Violations of competition laws carry fines and expose the Group and its employees to criminal sanctions and civil suits. Furthermore, it is now common for persons or corporations allegedly injured by violations of competition laws to sue for damages.

The broad range of activities and countries in which the Group operates requires local analysis, by business segment, of the legal risks in terms of competition law. Some of the Group’s business segments have already been implementing competition law conformity plans for a long time. Moreover,In 2012, a Group-wideGroup policy designed to coordinate risk management measures andfor compliance with competition law conformityand prevention of violations in this area was adopted. Its deployment is based on a dedicated organization, the involvement of hierarchies and staff, and a warning process.

Cuba, Iran and Syria

Provided in this section is certain information relating to TOTAL’s activities in Cuba and its presence in Iran and Syria. For more information on U.S. and EU restrictions relevant to TOTAL in these jurisdictions, see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk Factors”.

Cuba

In 2013, Marketing & Services had limited marketing activities for the sale of specialty products to non-state entities in Cuba and paid taxes of approximately425,000 on such activities. Hutchinson, a Refining & Chemicals affiliate, had limited sales in Cuba of transmission belts for agricultural machinery via a government-controlled intermediary that received a commission of approximately77,000. In addition, Trading & Shipping purchased hydrocarbons pursuant to spot contracts from a state-controlled entity for approximately101 million and sold energy options to this state-controlled entity for approximately4 million.

Iran

Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates

engaged during the 2013 calendar year in certain Iran-related activities. While TOTAL has not engaged in any activity that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D)(i) or (D)(ii) of Section 13(r)(1), affiliates of the Company may be deemed to have engaged in certain transactions or dealings with the government of Iran that would require disclosure pursuant to Section 13(r)(1)(D)(iii), as discussed below.

The Group has no exploration and production activities in Iran and maintains a local office in Iran solely for non-operational functions. Some payments are yet to be reimbursed to the Group with respect to past expenditures and remuneration under buyback contracts entered into between 1997 and 1999 with the National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) for the development of the South Pars 2&3 and Dorood fields. With respect to these contracts, development operations have been completed and the Group is no longer involved in the operation of these fields. In 2013, Total E&P Iran (100%), Elf Petroleum Iran (99.8%), Total Sirri (100%) and Total South Pars (99.8%) collectively made payments of less than0.5 million to (i) the Iranian administration for taxes and social security contributions concerning the personnel of the aforementioned local office and residual buyback contract-related obligations, and (ii) Iranian public entities for payments with respect to the maintenance of the aforementioned local office (e.g., utilities, telecommunications). TOTAL expects similar payments to be made in 2014, and it did not recognize any revenues or profits from the aforementioned in 2013.

In 2013, as part of its ongoing global strategy for the protection of its intellectual property, TOTAL paid taxes of approximately1,500 to the Iranian national intellectual property office with respect to patents filed in Iran prior to 2013. The Group anticipates paying similar taxes in the future.

Total E&P UK Limited (“TEP UK”), a wholly-owned affiliate of TOTAL, had limited contacts in 2013 with the Iranian Oil Company UK Ltd (“IOC”), a subsidiary of NIOC. These contacts related to agreements governing certain transportation, processing and operation services formerly provided to a joint venture at the Rhum field in the UK, co-owned by BP (50%, operator) and IOC (50%), by a joint venture at the Bruce field between BP (37%, operator), TEP UK (43.25%), BHP Billiton Petroleum Great Britain Ltd (16%) and Marubeni Oil & Gas (North Sea) Limited (3.75%) and by TEP UK’s Frigg UK Association pipeline (100%). To TOTAL’s knowledge, no services have been provided under the aforementioned agreements since November 2010, when the Rhum field stopped production following the adoption of EU sanctions, other than critical safety-related services (i.e., monitoring and marine inspection of the Rhum facilities), which are permitted by EU sanctions regulations. These agreements led to the signature in 2005 of an agreement by TEP UK and Naftiran Intertrade Co. (“NICO”) (IOC’s parent company and a subsidiary of NIOC) for the purchase by TEP UK of Rhum field natural gas liquids from NICO. This agreement was terminated by TEP UK with effect from December 2013 and, prior to that, there had been no purchases under this agreement since November 2010. TEP UK’s contacts with IOC and NICO in 2013 in regard to the aforementioned agreements were limited to exchanging letters and notifications regarding contract administration and declarations of force majeure. TOTAL did not recognize any revenues or profits from the aforementioned in 2013. Furthermore, on October 22, 2013, the UK government notified IOC of its decision to apply a temporary management scheme to IOC’s interest in the Rhum field within the meaning of UK Regulations 3 and 5 of the Hydrocarbons (Temporary Management Scheme) Regulations 2013 (the “Hydrocarbons Regulations”). On December 6, 2013, the UK government further authorized TEP UK, among others,

(1)

Source: Reuters.

76TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 4 - Other Matters

under Article 43a of EU Regulation 267/2012, as amended by 1263/2012 and under Regulation 9 of the Hydrocarbons Regulations, to carry out activities in relation to the operation and production of the Rhum field. As a result, TEP UK does not anticipate having any contacts with IOC in 2014. In addition, on September 4, 2013, the U.S. Treasury Department issued a license to BP authorizing BP and certain others to engage in various activities relating to the operation and production of the Rhum field. The Rhum field remains shut down, but it is anticipated that production could restart at some point in 2014.

The Group does not purchase Iranian hydrocarbons or own or operate any refineries or chemicals plants in Iran.

Until December 2012, at which time it sold its entire interest, the Group held a 50% interest in the company Beh Total (now named Beh Tam) along with Behran Oil (50%), a company controlled by entities with ties to the government of Iran. As part of the sale of the Group’s interest in Beh Tam, TOTAL S.A. agreed to license the trademark “Total” to Beh Tam for an initial 3-year period for the sale by Beh Tam of lubricants to domestic consumers in Iran. Total E&P Iran (“TEPI”), a wholly-owned affiliate of TOTAL S.A., expects to receive, on behalf of TOTAL S.A., annual royalty payments in Rials from Beh Tam during the period 2014-2016 for such license. Each payment will be based on Beh Tam’s sales of lubricants during the previous calendar year. Representatives of the Group and Beh Tam met twice in 2013 to discuss the local lubricants market and further discussions are expected to take place in the future. TEPI received payments in 2013 from Beh Tam in Rials of approximately2.6 million that corresponded to an outstanding 2011 Beh Total dividend payment and the settling of debts related to the Group’s prior ownership. Similar payments, in addition to the royalty payments described above, are expected to be received from Beh Tam in 2014.

Total Marketing Middle East FZE (“TMME”), a wholly-owned affiliate of the Group, which had stopped sales of lubricants to Beh Total at the end of 2012, decided in 2013 to resume such sales to Beh Tam in Iran. The sale in 2013 of approximately 188 t of lubricants generated gross revenue of approximately1.0 million and a net profit of approximately0.2 million. TMME expects to continue such activity in 2014.

Total Oil Turkiye A.S. (“TOT A.S.”), a company wholly-owned by the Group and three Group employees, sold in 2013 approximately 81 t of additives to a privately-held Turkish company not affiliated with the Group, which subsequently sold such additives to Beh Tam for the manufacture of lubricants. This activity generated for TOT A.S. gross revenue of approximately296,000 and a net profit of approximately54,000. TOT A.S. does not expect to continue this activity in 2014.

Total Ethiopia Ltd (“TEL”), an Ethiopian company held 99.99% by the Group and the rest by three Group employees, paid approximately63,000 in 2013 to Merific Iran Gas Co, an Ethiopian company majority-owned by entities affiliated with the government of Iran, pursuant to a contract for the transport and storage of LPG in Ethiopia purchased by TEL from international markets. TEL expects to stop pursuing this activity in 2014.

Total Belgium NV (“Total Belgium”), a company held 99.99% by the Group and the rest by an individual, provided in early 2013 fuel payment cards to Iranian diplomatic missions in Belgium for use in the Group’s service stations. In 2013, these activities generated gross revenue of approximately27,500 and net income of approximately550. The company terminated this contractual agreement in 2013. In addition, Total Belgium supplied approximately 11,000 liters of heating fuel (gasoil) to the Iranian Embassy in Brussels. In 2013, this activity generated gross

revenue of approximately9,500 and net income of approximately1,500. Such supply arrangements ceased in December 2013 and there are no plans to resume such supply.

Total Deutschland GmbH (“Total Deutschland”), a German company wholly-owned by the Group, provided in 2013 fuel payment cards to Iranian diplomatic missions in Germany for use in the Group’s service stations. In 2013, these activities generated gross revenue of approximately4,400 and a net profit of approximately50. Total Deutschland is in the process of terminating this arrangement.

In addition, the Group holds a 50% interest in, but does not operate, Samsung Total Petrochemicals Co. Ltd (“STC”), a South Korean incorporated joint venture with Samsung General Chemicals Co., Ltd. (50%). In reliance on the exemption provided in Section 1245(d)(4)(D) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) announced on December 7, 2012, STC purchased approximately 150,000 t of condensates in early 2013 directly or indirectly from companies affiliated with the Iranian government for approximately94 million. As such condensates are used by STC as inputs for its manufacturing processes, it is not possible to estimate the revenues from sales or net income attributable to such purchases. STC stopped such purchases in March 2013.

Syria

Since early December 2011, TOTAL has been under development sinceceased its activities that contribute to oil and gas production in Syria and maintains a local office solely for non-operational functions. In 2013, TOTAL made payments of approximately0.5 million to Syrian government agencies in the beginningform of 2012.taxes and contributions for services rendered by the Syrian public sector in relation to the maintenance of the aforementioned office and its personnel.

Organizational Structure

TOTAL S.A. is the parent company of the TOTAL Group. As of December 31, 2011,2013, there were 870898 consolidated subsidiaries, of which 783809 were fully consolidated and 8789 were accounted for under the equity method. Formethod.For a list of the principal consolidated subsidiaries of the Company, see Note 35 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

TOTAL S.A.’s scope of consolidation includes at least all companies in which the Company holds a direct or indirect interest, the book value of which on that date is at least equal to 10% of the amount of TOTAL S.A.’s equity or of the consolidated net assets of the Group, or which has generated at least 10% of the TOTAL S.A.’s net income or of the Group’s consolidated net income during the last year.

Significant changes in the Group’s interests in listed companies in 2011, 2012 and 2013

TOTAL’s interest in Novatek

In March 2011, TOTAL signed an agreement in principle to acquire a 12.09% capital interest in Novatek, a Russian company listed on the Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange and the London Stock Exchange, with both parties intending TOTAL to increase its stake to 15% within 12 months and to 19.40% within 36 months.

TOTAL acquired its 12.09% capital interest in Novatek in April 2011 by purchasing shares from Novatek’s two major shareholders. Further to this transaction, TOTAL is now represented on the Novatek Board of Directors.

TOTAL raised its stake to 14.09% in December 2011, by acquiring an additional 2% capital interest in Novatek from its two major shareholders, in the framework of the agreement concluded in March 2011.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.77


Items 4 - 5

In 2012 and 2013, TOTAL proceeded to the acquisition of shares in Novatek on a gradual basis. As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL held, through its subsidiary Total E&P Arctic Russia, 515,067,590 shares out of a total of 3,036,306,000 outstanding shares, representing 16.96% of Novatek’s share capital and voting rights.

TOTAL’s interest in SunPower

In April 2011, SunPower, an American company listed on the NASDAQ, and TOTAL signed a strategic agreement for the acquisition by TOTAL, through a friendly takeover bid, of 60% of SunPower’s outstanding shares for a price of $23.25 per share, totaling around $1.4 billion. The friendly takeover bid was concluded successfully in June 2011.

TOTAL also signed in 2011 a 5-year financial guarantee agreement with SunPower for a maximum amount of $1 billion, as well as a liquidity support agreement for a maximum amount of $600 million for a maximum 5-year term.

In January 2012, TOTAL’s interest in SunPower increased to 66% as the result of capital increase coinciding with the Tenesol transaction.

As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL held, through its subsidiary Total Gas & Power USA, 78,576,682 shares out of a total of 121,535,913 outstanding shares, representing 64.65% of SunPower’s share capital and voting rights.

TOTAL’s interest in Sanofi

In fiscal year 2012, TOTAL sold the remainder of its holding in Sanofi, held indirectly through its subsidiary Elf Aquitaine.

Over the years 2010 and 2011, TOTAL’s interest in Sanofi successively changed from 7.33% of the outstanding shares and 12.29% of the voting rights on December 31, 2009, to 5.51% of the outstanding shares and 9.15% of the voting rights on December 31, 2010, and then to 3.22% of the outstanding shares and 5.46% of the voting rights on December 31, 2011.

Property, PlantsPlant and Equipment

TOTAL has freehold and leasehold interests in numerous countries throughout the world, none of which is material to TOTAL. See “— Business Overview — Upstream” for a description of TOTAL’s reserves and sources of oil and gas.

 

 

ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

 

This section is the Company’s analysis of its financial performance and of significant trends that may affect its future performance. It should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)IFRS as issued by the IASB and IFRS as adopted by the European Union.EU.

This section contains forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties. For a list of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, see “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” on page vi.iv.

 

 

OVERVIEW

 

 

TOTAL’s results are affected by a variety of factors, including changes in crude oil and natural gas prices as well as refining and marketing margins, which are all generally expressed in dollars, and changes in exchange rates, particularly the value of the euro compared to the dollar. Higher crude oil and natural gas prices generally have a positive effect on the income of TOTAL, since its Upstream oil and gas business benefits from the resulting increase in revenues realized from production. Lower crude oil and natural gas prices generally have a corresponding negative effect. The effect of changes in crude oil prices on TOTAL’s DownstreamRefining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services activities depends upon the speed at which the prices of refined petroleum products adjust to reflect such changes. In the past several years, crude oil and natural gas prices have varied greatly. As TOTAL reports its results in euros, but conducts its operations mainly in dollars, the effect of an

increase in crude oil and natural gas prices is partly offset by the effect of the variation in exchange rates during periods of weakening of the dollar relative to the euro and strengthened during periods of strengthening of the dollar relative to the euro. TOTAL’s results are also significantly affected by the costs of its activities, in particular those related to exploration and production, and by the outcome of its strategic decisions with respect to cost reduction efforts. TOTAL’s results are also affected by general economic and political conditions and changes in governmental laws and regulations, as well as by the impact of decisions by OPEC on production levels. However, the Euro zone’s turbulences during the fiscal year 2011 did not affect the Group significantly. For more information, see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk Factors” and “Item 4. Information on the Company — Other Matters”.

The year 2011 witnessed a number2013 was marked by the end of the recession in the euro zone in the second quarter and the stability of emerging countries. This improvement was mitigated in the third quarter by the impacts of significant exchange rate fluctuations in emerging markets and the budget debate in the United States.

In this context, global oil demand rose sharply by +1.1 Mb/d(1), compared to +0.8 Mb/d in 2012, driven by demand in Asia and the Middle East. Global oil supplies were up moderately in 2013 by +0.4 Mb/d after an increase of +2.3 Mb/d in 2012. Market supplies remained adequate mainly due to the increase in non-conventional oil production in North America, whereas the persistence of geopolitical events thatfactors, particularly in Libya, Nigeria and Iraq, put pressurea strain on OPEC production. The oil market supplies. Despite the economic slowdown, demand for oil products continued to rise, fuelled by the growth of emerging markets. Pressure on supply, plus rising demand, resultedenvironment in 2013 therefore remained relatively stable with a sharp increase in theBrent price of crude oil. The average price of Brent in 2011 was $111/$108.7/b compared with $80/to $111.7/b in 2010.2012.

Gas spot prices remained stable in Asia in 2013, sustained by demand, and averaged $16/Mbtu. In Europe, gas spot prices increased by more than 20% from $9/Mbtu in 2012 to $11/Mbtu in 2013. Similarly, after a sharp drop due to the abundant supply of natural gas following the development of shale gas, gas spot prices in the United States rose by more than 30% in 2013, averaging $4/Mbtu compared to $3/Mbtu in 2012.

In the downstream, 2013 saw a sharp decline in European refining margins, which was partly offset by a more favorable petrochemicals environment. Given the effect of over-capacities, the continued high Brent price and sluggish demand, the

(1)

IEA data, excluding biofuels and refining gains.

78TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

European Refining Margin Indicator (“ERMI”)(1) was $17.9/t in 2013, compared to rise$36.0/t in 2012. For their part, petrochemical margins in Europe and the United States increased during the year by approximately 25% on average as a result of lower raw material prices (naphtha in Europe and Asia, in 2011, mainly due to increased demand on Asian markets. Spot prices for gasethane and LPG in the United States remained very low, due to the continued rise in production, driven by the development of non-conventional gases.

Despite the gradual adjustment of refining capacity, the overcapacity that has existed in the European refining market since 2009 continued into 2011, due to low demand in Europe. Refining margins dropped to an average of $17/t in 2011, compared with $27/t in 2010(1)States). In the first half of 2011, the Chemicals segment enjoyed a globally favorable environment, which has deteriorated since then. In the second half of the year, the Base Chemicals and Specialty Chemicals divisions saw their margins shrink due to the drop in demand caused by the economic slowdown.

In this environment, TOTAL’s net income (Groupincome(Group share) amounted to12.38.4 billion up 16% compared to10.6 billion in 2010., down20% from 2012. This result essentially reflects a betterthe decrease in net income of the Upstream environment, whilesegment, which was partly offset by the Downstream and Chemicals segments were faced with more difficult conditions thanincrease in 2010. net income of Marketing & Services.

The Upstream segment’s 2011 adjusted net operating income of10.4 billion was up 21% compared with8.6 billion in 2010 due to rising prices, but was also negatively impacted by the-$ exchange rate. The Downstream segment’s adjusted net operating income dropped by 7% toreached1.19.4 billion in 2011 compared to1.2 billion2013, a 16% decrease from the previous year, impacted by a less favorable production mix, an increase in 2010.technical costs, especially exploration expenses, and an increase in the effective tax rate. In 2013, the Refining & Chemicals segment benefited from the concrete effects of the synergy and operational efficiency plans and a more favorable petrochemicals environment. This result can be explainedhelped offset the sharp decline in particular by the impact of reduced refining margins in Europe and the sale of the Group’s stake in CEPSA, which were partially offset by an improvement in operational performance. The Chemicals segment’sallowed adjusted net operating income dropped by 10% to775 million in 2011 from857 million in 2010, due to remain stable compared with 2012. Finally, the more difficult market environment at the end of the year and the asset sales in 2011 (resins, CEPSA).

The year 2011 saw numerous acquisitions and asset sales, reflecting the Group’s ambition to optimize its portfolio by creating value from certain mature assets and by developing its Upstream assets with high potential for growth.

TOTAL benefited from the rise in its operational cash flow and the8 billion inflows from asset sales in 2011 to fund theMarketing & Services segment recorded a 39% increase in its investment program, while maintaining a dividend of2.28 per share, which will be submitted for approval to the Shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2012. The balance sheet remained strong, with a net-debt-to- equity ratio(2) of 23% at the end of 2011,adjusted net operating income compared with 22% at the end2012, thanks in particular to improved performance in New Energies, which posted significant losses in 2012, and overall growth in marketing of 2010.petroleum products, driven mainly by emerging markets.

In terms of operations, 2011 saw the continued improvement of safety performance, with a 15% dropAcquisitions were3.4 billion in the Group-wide TRIR(3) compared with 2010.

In the Upstream segment, three major discoveries in Azerbaijan, Bolivia and French Guiana were the first results of the Group’s bolder exploration strategy. The year 2011 also witnessed the successful start-up of the Pazflor deep-offshore platform in Angolan waters, a project operated by TOTAL that illustrates the Group’s expertise in the development of major projects. Five new major projects, including the Ichthys LNG project in Australia (TOTAL, 24%), were also launched, in order to secure growth in the years to come.

Still in the Upstream segment, 2011 also saw the announcement2013, comprised essentially of the acquisition of a 14.09%20% stake in the Russian company Novatek andLibra field in Brazil, an increase of the Group’s stakesadditional 6% stake in the Fort HillsIchthys project in Canada andAustralia, an additional 1.6% stake in Tempa RossaNovatek(2), the carry agreement in Italy. At the end of 2011, the Group announced its entry into the Utica shale gas and condensates depositfield in the United States.States and the bonus for exploration licenses in South Africa, Mozambique and Brazil. Asset sales totaled3.6 billion, comprised essentially of the sale of TIGF, a 25% stake in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy, the 49% interest in the Voyager upgrader project in Canada, fertilizer operations and all the Exploration & Production assets in Trinidad and Tobago. Thus, of the $15-20 billion(approximately12-15 billion) in sales targeted for the 2012-2014 period, the Group had already sold $13 billion(3)(approximately10 billion) in assets at the end of 2013(4).

As announced, the intensive investment phase aimed at transforming the Group’s production profile by 2017 reached a peak of $28 billion (21.3 billion) in 2013. TOTAL financed its investments and dividends while maintaining a sound balance sheet and ended 2013 with a ratio of net debt to equity of 23%. On the strength of this financial soundness and in keeping with its competitive shareholder return policy, the Board of Directors decided to propose at the May 16, 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting a dividend of2.38/share for 2013, which represents a 3.4% increase for the remaining dividend.

In terms of operations, the Group’s production was impacted by safety issues in Libya and Nigeria, the effects of which were partly offset by the improved situation in Yemen and by the restart of Elgin-Franklin in the North Sea and OML 58 in Nigeria.

With responsibility and transparency, TOTAL reasserts the utmost priority it gives to the safety of operations and its commitment to environmental protection. Thus, the Group further improved its

safety performance, with a 14% drop in TRIR(5) compared with 2012. For all of its projects conducted in a large number of countries, the Group also places emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) challenges and the development of local economies.

In the Upstream segment, 2013 saw the launch of major projects in Congo, Nigeria, Canada and Russia and the acquisition of interests in high-potential assets, particularly in Brazil with the acquisition of a 20% stake in the Libra field. TOTAL has therefore confirmed its production growth targets and strengthened its prospects beyond 2017. The Group also pursued its ambitious exploration program and made large discoveries in Iraq and Argentina. In 2013, the Group continued to extend its oil and gas acreage by acquiring stakesobtaining licenses in promising exploration areas, such asparticularly in Iraq, Brazil, Bolivia and South Africa.

In the pre-salt blocksRefining & Chemicals segment, the synergy and operational efficiency plans yielded concrete results that, together with a more favorable petrochemicals environment, enabled this segment to record stable income despite an extremely weak refining environment in Europe. The year 2013 was also marked by the start of production at the SATORP refinery in Saudi Arabia and by the announcement of the launch of a major investment program to upgrade the Antwerp platform in Belgium and a project to adapt the petrochemicals platform in Carling, France, in order to restore its competitiveness.

In the Marketing & Services segment, the Group’s strategy is to optimize its operations in Europe, strengthen its leading positions on the African continent and in the Kwanza basinMiddle East and expand its presence in Angola, and by acquiring stakes in deposits that have already been discovered, such as the Yamal LNG project in Russia.

Atglobal lubricants market, while at the same time maintaining a profitability target of over 17%. Thus, in 2011,2013, the Group strengthened its leadership in Europe by increasing its network market share with 600 Total Access service stations now deployed in France. TOTAL disposed of certain mature or non-strategic Upstream assets, includingalso continued its exploration-production subsidiary in Cameroon and its stakes in pipelines in Colombia.

In the realm of new energies, TOTAL acquired in 2011 a 60% stake (now, 66%) in the U.S. company SunPower, to become one of the leaders in the solar industry. Although currently in the consolidation phase, this industry offers opportunities for strong growth.

In the Downstream and Chemicals segments, TOTAL deployed its strategy of increasing the competitive performance of its activities, scaling down its exposure to mature zones, mainly Europe, and bolstering its presence

(1)Based on TOTAL’s “European Refining Margin Indicator” (ERMI).
(2)Net-debt-to-equity ratio = net debt (i.e., the sum of current borrowings, other current financial liabilities and non-current financial debt, net of current financial assets, hedging instruments on non-current financial debt and cash and cash equivalents) divided by the sum of shareholders’ equity and non-controlling interests after expected dividends payable.
(3)Total Recordable Injury Rate.

expansion in high-growth areas. Consequently, 2011 sawmarkets and developed its positions in Egypt and Pakistan. In 2013, the photovoltaic solar energy sector stabilized after two years of sharp price decreases. Against this backdrop, New Energies improved its competitiveness and TOTAL and SunPower (64.65%) announced a number of successful initiatives, including the start-up of the deep-conversion unit (or coker) in Port Arthur in the United States, the continued modernization of the refineryCalifornia Valley Solar Ranch solar power plant and the petrochemicals platformlaunch of new solar power plant projects in Normandy, France,Chile and the construction of the Jubail refinery in Saudi Arabia. The Group also continued to scale down its refining capacity in Europe, by selling off its stake in the Spanish company CEPSA.South Africa.

On the Marketing front, in 2011, the Group continued its optimization drive by selling off its distribution activities in the United Kingdom and launching a program to modernize part of its service station network in France with the Total access program. In the Specialty Chemicals division, the Group sold part of its Resins activity.

A restructuring of the Downstream and Chemicals sectors was announced in October 2011. The deployment of this project led to organizational changes on January 1, 2012, with the creation of:

a Refining & Chemicals segment, a large industrial base that encompasses refining, petrochemicals, fertilizers and specialty chemicals operations. This segment also includes oil trading and shipping activities.

a Supply & Marketing segment, which is dedicated to worldwide supply and marketing activities in the oil products field.

The process initiated in 2004 to increase R&D budgets continued with expenditures in 2011 of776949 million in 2013, up 9%nearly 20% compared to 2010,2012, with the aim, of, in particular, of the continued improvement of the Group’s technological expertise in the development of oil and gas resources and the development of solar, biomass, carbon capture and storage technologies in order to contribute to changes in the global energy mix.

Finally, in 2011, TOTAL reasserted the priority on safety and the environment as part of its operations throughout its business. For all of its projects conducted in a large number of countries, the Group puts an emphasis on corporate social responsibility (CSR) challenges and the development of the local economies.

Outlook

In 2012, TOTAL intends to consolidate its drivers for growth and enhanceAfter reaching a peak of $28 billion(approximately21 billion) in 2013, the priority given to safety, reliability and acceptability of its operations.

The 2012 netorganic investment budget is $20was reduced to $26 billion (approximately(approximately14.3 billion(1)). TOTAL intends to continue20 billion)

to actively manage its asset portfolio with, in particular, a program of non-strategic asset sales. The 2012 budget for organic investments (i.e., net investments excluding acquisitions and asset sales) is $24 billion (approximately17.1 billion).

Capital expenditures will mostly be focused on the Upstream segment with an allocation of $20 billion (approximately14.3 billion), or2014, more than 80% of which will be dedicated to Upstream. Moreover, all the Group’s organic capital expenditure budget. About 30%segments are making efforts to control their investments and reduce their operating costs while continuing to make safety an absolute priority.

(1)

TOTAL’s margin indicator.

(2)

The Group’s interest in Novatek was 16.96% at December 31, 2013.

(3)

Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate of $1.3281/1 for the full year 2013.

(4)

Including other transactions with minority interests.

(5)

Total Recordable Injury Rate.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.79


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

As discussed above, of the investment$15-20 billion(approximately12-15 billion) in sales targeted for the 2012-2014 period, the Group had already sold $13 billion(approximately10 billion) in assets at the end of 2013(1). The proposed sales being negotiated and reviewed should enable TOTAL to reach, and possibly exceed, the announced target.

In the Upstream segment, is expectedTOTAL confirmed its production growth targets of 2.6 Mboe/d by 2015 and the potential for 3 Mboe/d by 2017. Nearly all the projects needed to be dedicated to producing assets while 70% is expected to be assigned to developing new projects. Downstream organic capital expendituresachieve these targets are now either in production or in the Refining & Chemicalsdevelopment phase. In 2014, after the expiration of the ADCO license, production will benefit from a ramp-up of recently started projects and Supply & Marketing segments are expected to amount to $3from the start-up of TOTAL-operated projects CLOV in Angola, Laggan-Tormore in the UK and Ofon Phase 2 in Nigeria.

TOTAL is pursuing its ambitious exploration program with a stable budget of $2.8 billion (approximately(approximately2.12.2 billion). This program includes, in particular, high-potential drilling in Brazil, the Kwanza Basin in Angola, Ivory Coast and $1 billion (approximatelySouth Africa.714 million), respectively, in 2012.

In line with the strategy to develop a number of major integrated platforms in order to stimulate growth and improve competitive performance, the main projects in the Refining & Chemicals segment, the productivity gains and synergies resulting from the ongoing restructuring should continue in 2012 will be2014 and contribute, in a constant environment, to the upgradingimprovement in the segment’s profitability. Also in 2014, the start-up of the Normandy refinery and petrochemical plant, the buildinglast units of the JubailSATORP refinery in Jubail, Saudi Arabia will make this new integrated platform fully operational.

The Marketing & Services segment will develop its positions in the most high-growth markets and continue to optimize its positions in Europe. New Energies, at breakeven in 2013, should continue to benefit from ongoing efforts at SunPower focusing on productivity, development and innovation.

Since the expansionstart of the Daesan platform in South Korea. Wherever it operates, TOTAL will continue to make capital expenditureyear 2014, the environment has remained favorable in the maintenance and safety of its facilities a top priority.upstream, while refining margins have continued to deteriorate significantly in Europe.

The Group also confirms its commitment with respect to R&D with a budget increasing to about $1.2 billion (approximately857 million) in 2012.

In the Upstream segment, TOTAL will deploy its strategy intended to speed up growth of its production, while improving the profitability of its portfolio of assets. The year 2012 should see the launch of numerous projects. In 2012, TOTAL plans to bring eight new major projects on-stream, which will contribute to expected growth in output in 2012 and achieving the target rate of average annual production growth of 2.5% between 2010 and 2015: Usan and OML 58 Upgrade in Nigeria, Islay in the UK North Sea, Angola LNG in Angola, Bongkot South in Thailand, Halfaya in Iraq, Sulige in China and Kashagan in Kazakhstan. The Group will also continue to evaluate numerous other projects, in particular in Western Africa, Russia and Canada. The anticipated launch of these projects during the course of the next two years should improve visibility on growth in output after 2015. With an exploration budget that stands at $2.5 billion (approximately1.8 billion), up 20% compared to 2011, the Group will continue to pursue an ambitious and diversified strategy.

(1)All euro figures in this section converted at a rate of $1.40/.

In the Downstream sector, with a new organization that will allow it to take up the challenges specific to each activity of that sector, the Group should start to reap the first benefits of an integrated Refining & Chemicals segment and Supply & Marketing segment, each of which is closer to its markets. TOTAL will strive to improve its competitiveness by adapting its activities in Europe and seeking to enhance its operational efficiency and synergies between its operations. The year 2012 will see continued development in high-growth zones, with the expected start-upfavor of a new polyethylene production unitcompetitive policy for returns to shareholders, in Qatar and the completion

keeping with its objective of the first step of the expansion of its Daesan platform in South Korea.

In 2012, TOTAL can rely on its solid balance sheet and on the start-up and ramp-up of new projects that should contribute to the growth of operating cash flow. Moreover, in 2012, TOTAL will continue to develop its new projects through an ambitious capital expenditure program, while maintaining a target for the net-debt-to-equity ratio of between 20-30% and a dividend policy based on an average pay-out ratio of 50% of adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share(1).sustainable growth.

 

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

 

A summary of the Group’s accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Group to report useful and reliable information about the Group’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company has changed its method for reserve estimates due to the adoption of the Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-03, Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures, effective for annual reporting periods ended on or after December 31, 2009.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the date of preparation of the financial statements and reported income and expenses for the period. Management reviews these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, by reference to past experience and various other factors considered as reasonable which form the basis for assessing the book valuecarrying amount of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates, if different assumptions or circumstances apply.

Lastly, where the accounting treatment of a specific transaction is not addressed by any accounting standards or interpretation, management applies its judgment to define and apply accounting policies that will lead to relevantprovide information consistent with the general IFRS concepts: faithful representation, relevance and reliable information, so that the financial statements:materiality.

give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows;

reflect the substance of transactions;

are neutral;

are prepared on a prudent basis; and

are complete in all material aspects.

The following summary provides further information about the critical accounting policies that involve significant elements of management judgment, and which could have a significant impact on the results of the Group. It should be read in conjunction with Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The assessment of critical accounting policies below is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the uncertainties in financial results that can occur from the application of the full range of the Company’s accounting policies. Materially different financial results could occur in the application of other accounting policies as well. Likewise, materially different results can occur upon the adoption of new accounting standards promulgated by the various rule-making bodies.

Successful efforts method of oil and gas accounting

The Group follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas activities. The Group’s oil and gas reserves are

estimated by the Group’s petroleum engineers in accordance with industry standards and SEC regulations. In December 2008, the SEC published a revised set of rules for the estimation of reserves. These revised rules were used for the year-end estimation of reserves beginning in 2009. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations, prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic

(1)For the adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share, see the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein, Note 4) Business segment information — A) Information by business segment.

methods are used for the estimation. These estimates do not include probable or possible reserves. Estimated oil and gas reserves are based on available reservoir data and prices and costs in the accounting period during which the estimate is made and are subject to future revision. The Group reassesses its oil and gas reserves at least once a year on all its properties.

Exploration leasehold acquisition costs are capitalized when acquired. During the exploration phase, management exercises judgment on the probability that prospects ultimately would partially or fully fail to find proved oil and gas reserves. Based on this judgmental approach, a leasehold impairment charge may be recorded. This position is assessed and adjusted throughout the contractual period of the leasehold based in particular on the results of exploratory activity and any impairment is adjusted prospectively.

When a discovery is made, exploratory drilling costs continue to be capitalized pending determination of whether potentially economic oil and gas reserves have been discovered by the drilling effort. The length of time necessary for this determination depends on the specific technical or economic difficulties in assessing the recoverability of the reserves. If a determination is made that the well did not encounter oil and gas in economically viable quantities, the well costs are expensed and are reported in exploration expense.

Exploratory drilling costs are temporarily capitalized pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves if both of the following conditions are met:

 

the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify, if appropriate, its completion as a producing well, assuming that the required capital expenditure is made; and

(1)

Including other transactions will minority interests (sale of minority equity interests in Total E&P Congo and Block 14 in Angola).

80TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

satisfactory progress toward ultimate development of the reserves is being achieved, with the Company making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project.

The Company evaluates the progress made on the basis of regular project reviews which take into account the following factors:

 

First, if additional exploratory drilling or other exploratory activities (such as seismic work or other significant studies) are either underway or firmly planned, the Company deems there is satisfactory progress. For these purposes, exploratory activities are considered firmly planned only if they are included in the Company’s three-year3-year exploration plan/budget.

In cases where exploratory activity has been completed, the evaluation of satisfactory progress takes into account indicators such as the fact that costs for development studies are incurred in the current period, or that governmental or other third-party authorizations are pending or that the availability of capacity on an existing transport or processing facility awaits confirmation.

costs for development studies are incurred in the current period, or that governmental or other third-party authorizations are pending or that the availability of capacity on an existing transport or processing facility awaits confirmation.

The successful efforts method requires, among other things, that the capitalized costs for proved oil and gas properties (which include the costs of drilling successful wells) be amortized on the basis of reserves that are produced in a period as a percentage of the total estimated proved reserves. The impact of changes in estimated proved reserves is dealt with prospectively by amortizing the remaining book value of the asset over the expected future production. If proved reserve estimates are revised downward, earnings could be affected by higher depreciation expense or an immediate write-down of the property’s book value. Conversely, if the oil and gas quantities were revised upwards, future per-barrel depreciation and depletion expense would be lower.

Valuation of long-lived assets

In addition to oil and gas assets that could become impaired under the application of successful efforts accounting, other assets could become impaired and require write-down if circumstances warrant. Conditions that could cause an asset to become impaired include lower-than-expected commodity sales prices, changes in the Group’s business plans or a significant adverse change in the local or national business climate. The amount of an impairment charge would be based on estimates of the higher of the value in use or the fair value minus cost to sell compared with its book value. The value in use is based on the present value of expected future cash flow using assumptions commensurate with the risks involved in the asset group. The expected future cash flow used for impairment reviews is based on judgmental assessments of future production volumes, prices and costs, considering information available at the date of review.

Asset retirement obligations and environmental remediation

When legal and contractual obligations require it, the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive), upon application of International Accounting Standard (IAS) 37 and IAS 16, it records provisions for the future decommissioning of production facilities at the end of their economic lives. Management makes judgments and estimates in recording liabilities. Most of these removal obligations are many years in the future and the precise requirements that will have to be met when the removal event actually occurs are uncertain. Asset removal technologies and costs are constantly changing, as well as political, environmental, safety and public expectations.

The Group also makes judgments and estimates in recording costs and establishing provisions for environmental clean-up and remediation costs, which are based on current information on costs and expected plans for remediation. For environmental provisions, actual costs can differ from estimates because of changes in laws and regulations, public expectations, discovery and analysis of site conditions and changes in clean-up technology.

Pensions and post-retirement benefits

Accounting for pensions and other post-retirement benefits involves judgments about uncertain events, including estimated retirement dates, salary levels at retirement, mortality rates, rates of return on plan assets, determination of discount rates for measuring plan obligations, healthcare cost-trend rates and rates of utilization of healthcare services by retirees. These assumptions are based on the environment in each country. The assumptions used are reviewed at the end of each year and may vary from year-to-year, based on the evolution of the situation, which will affect future results of operations. Any differences between these assumptions and the actual outcome will also impact future results of operations.

The significant assumptions used to account for pensions and other post-retirement benefits are determined as follows.

Discount rates primarily reflect the high quality rates of high qualityAA-rated corporate bonds.bonds of a duration equivalent to that of the plan obligations. Inflation rates reflect market conditions observed on a country-by-country basis.

Salary increase assumptions (when relevant) are determined by each entity. They reflect an estimate of the actual future salary levels of the individual employees involved, including future changes attributed to general price levels (consistent with inflation rate assumptions), productivity, seniority, promotion and other factors.

Healthcare cost trend assumptions (when relevant) reflect an estimate of the actual future changes in the cost of the healthcare-related benefits provided to the plan participants and are based on past and current healthcare cost trends including healthcare inflation, changes in healthcare utilization, and changes in health status of the participants.

Demographic assumptions such as mortality, disability and turnover reflect the best estimate of these future events for the individual employees involved, based principally on available actuarial data.

Determination of expected rates of return on pension plan assets is made through compound averaging. For each plan, the distribution of investments among bonds, equities and cash and the expected rates of return on bonds,

equities and cash are taken into account. A weighted-average rate is then calculated.

The effect pensions had on results of operations, cash flow and liquidity is fully set out in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Net employee benefit expense in 20112013 amounted to315297 million and the Company’s contributions to pension plans were347224 million.

Differences between projected and actual costs and between the projectednormative return and the actual return on plan assets routinely occur and are called actuarial gains and losses.recognized in the statement of comprehensive income, with no possibility to subsequently recycle them to the income statement.

The Group appliespast service cost in respect of defined benefit plans is recorded immediately in the statement of income, whether vested or unvested.

For defined contribution plans, expenses correspond to the contributions paid.

The revised standard IAS 19 “Employee benefits” applicable retrospectively from January 1, 2013, led in particular to the full

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.81


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

recognition of the net position in respect of employee benefits obligations (liabilities net of assets) in the balance sheet, the elimination of the corridor method to amortize its actuarial losses and gains. This method amortizesapproach previously used by the net cumulative actuarial gains and losses that exceed 10% ofGroup, the greater of (i) the present value of the defined benefit obligation, and (ii) the fair value of plan assets, over the average expected remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan.

The unrecognized actuarial losses of pension benefits as of December 31, 2011, were1,713 million compared to1,170 million for 2010. The increase in unrecognized actuarial losses is explained by actuarial losses due to a decrease in discount rates in 2011 and due to a decrease in the value of plan assets. As explained above, pension accounting principles allow that such actuarial losses be deferred and amortized over future periods, in the Company’s case a period of fifteen years.

The Company is considering a decreased weighted-average expected rate of return on pension plan assets of 5.35% for 2012 compared to the 2011 rate of 5.90%. The Company does not believe, based on currently available information, that it will be significantly modifying its discount rate in 2012 or the near future.

The Company’s estimates indicate that a 1% increase or decrease in the expected rate of return on pension plan assets would have caused a62 million decrease or increase, respectively, in the 2011 net periodic pension cost. The estimated impact on net periodic pension costend of the amortization of past services costs, and the unrecognized actuarial lossesobligation to evaluate the expected return on plan assets on a normative basis (via the discount rate used to value the debt).

The application of pension benefitsthis standard had an impact on January 1, 2013, January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2011 of an increase in employee benefit provisions of1,713 million as2.8 billion,1.8 billion and1.3 billion, respectively, and a respective decrease in equity of December 31,2.8 billion,1.8 billion and1.3 billion before tax (1.7 billion,1.1 billion and0.8 billion after tax), respectively. The impact on

the net income (Group share) for 2012 and 2011 is102 million for 2012, compared not significant. In accordance with the transitional rules of revised standard IAS 19, the comparative periods were restated to take into account the actual impactretrospective application of46 million for 2011. the standard.

Income tax computation

The computation of the Group’s income tax expense requires the interpretation of complex tax laws and regulations in many taxing jurisdictions around the world, the determination of expected outcomes from pending litigation, and the assessment of audit findings that are performed by numerous taxing authorities. Actual income tax expense may differ from management’s estimates.

 

RESULTS 2009-20112011-2013

 

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, (M, except per share data)  2011   2010   2009 

Non-Group sales

   184,693     159,269     131,327  

Net income (Group share)

   12,276     10,571     8,447  

Diluted earnings per share

   5.44     4.71     3.78  

As of and for the year ended December 31, (M, except per share data) 2013  2012  2011 

Non-Group sales

  189,542    200,061    184,693  

Net income (Group share)

  8,440    10,609    12,309  

Diluted earnings per share

  3.72    4.68    5.45  

 

In October 2011, the Group Results 2011 vs. 2010

announced a proposed reorganization of its Downstream and Chemicals segments. The year 2011 witnessedprocedure for informing and consulting with employee representatives took place and the reorganization became effective on January 1, 2012. This led to organizational changes, with the creation of: a numberRefining & Chemicals segment, a major production hub combining TOTAL’s refining, petrochemicals, fertilizers and specialty chemicals operations, as well as oil trading and shipping activities; and a Supply & Marketing segment (renamed the Marketing & Services segment on November 13, 2012), which is dedicated to the global supply and marketing activities of geopolitical events that put pressure on market supplies. Despiteoil products. A further reorganization of the economic slowdown, demand for oil products continued to rise, fueled by the growthGroup’s Upstream and Marketing & Services segments became effective as of emerging markets. Pressure on supply, plus rising demand, resulted in a sharp increase in the price of crude oil.

InJuly 1, 2012, with the Upstream segment now consisting of the activities of Gas & Power in addition to the exploration and production of hydrocarbons, and the Marketing & Services segment now consisting of the activities of New Energies in addition to the Group’s worldwide businesses of supplying and marketing petroleum products. Historical numbers and related qualitative commentary contained herein have been restated on this basis.

In addition, following the application of revised accounting standard IAS 19 effective January 1, 2013, the information for 2012, 2011, oil market2010 and 2009 has been restated; however, the impact on such restated results is not significant (for further information concerning this restatement, see the introduction to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Group results 2013 vs. 2012

On average, the upstream environment was marked byremained stable compared to the previous year with a 40% increase in the average Brent price of $108.7/b compared to $111.3/b from $79.5/$111.7/b in 2010.2012. In 2011,2013, TOTAL’s average liquids price realization(1)(1) increaseddecreased by 38%4% to $105.0/$103.3/b from $76.3/$107.7/b in 2010, in line with the increase in the average Brent price of oil.2012. TOTAL’s average natural gas price realization(1) for the Group’s consolidated subsidiaries increased in 2013 by 27%6% to $6.53/MBtu$7.12/Mbtu from $6.74/Mbtu in 2011 from $5.15/MBtu2012. In the downstream, the ERMI (European refining margin indicator) decreased sharply to $17.9/t on average compared to $36.0/t in 2010. 2012.

The average euro-dollar exchange rate was 1.39 $/averaged $1.33/ in 20112013 compared to 1.33 $/$1.28/ in 2010.2012.

In the Downstream segment, the Group’s European Refining Margin Indicator (ERMI) fell to $17.4/t in 2011 from $27.4/t in 2010. Despite the gradual reduction of refining capacity, the overcapacity that has existed in the European refining market since 2009 continued into 2011, due to low demand in Europe.

In the first half of 2011, the Chemicals segment enjoyed a globally favorable environment, which has since deteriorated. In the second half of the year, Petrochemicals and Specialty Chemicals saw their margins shrink due to the drop in demand caused by the economic slowdown.

Consolidated sales of TOTAL were184.7 billion in 2011, an increase of 16% from159.3 billion in 2010, as a result of an increase inthis context, non-Group sales in 2013 were189,542 million, a decrease of 5% compared to200,061 million for 2012, with non-Group sales decreasing 10% for the Upstream Downstreamsegment, 5% for the Refining & Chemicals segment and Chemicals segments of 26%, 15% and 11%, respectively.4% for the Marketing & Services segment.

Net income (Group share) in 2011 increased2013 decreased by 16%20% to12,2768,440 million from10,57110,609 million in 2010,2012, mainly due to the impact of the increase in hydrocarbon prices ona lower contribution from the Upstream segment’s results.segment, which was partially offset by a higher contribution from Marketing & Services. The after-tax inventory valuation effect (as defined below under “— Business

Segment Reporting”Analysis of business segment results”) had a positivenegative impact on net income (Group share) of834549 million in 20112013 and a positivenegative impact of748157 million in 2010, in each case essentially due to the increase in oil prices. As from January 1, 2011, the Group accounts for2012. The changes in fair value of trading inventories and storage contracts (as defined below under “— Business Segment Reporting”). Changes in fair valueAnalysis of these itemsbusiness segment results”) had a positivenegative impact on net income (Group share) of44 million in 2013 and a negative impact of7 million in 2012. Special items had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of1,712 million in 2013, comprised mainly of the loss on the sale of the Voyageur upgrader project in Canada, the impairment of Upstream assets in the Barnett field in the United States and in Syria, charges and write-offs related to the restructuring of downstream activities in France, partially offset by the gain on the sales of TIGF and Upstream assets in Italy. Special items had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of1,503 million in 2012, as described in “— Group results 2012 vs. 2011”, below.

Income taxes in 2013 amounted to11,110 million, a decrease of 15% compared to13,035 million in 2012, primarily as a result of the decrease in taxable income.

In 2013, TOTAL bought back 4.4 million of its own shares (i.e. 0.19% of the share capital as of December 31, 2013) under the authorization granted by the shareholders at the meeting of May 17, 2013 (see “Item 10. Share buybacks in 2013”). The number of fully-diluted shares at December 31, 2013, was 2,276 million compared to 2,270 million at December 31, 2012.

Fully-diluted earnings per share, based on 2,272 million weighted-average shares, was3.72 in 2013 compared to4.68 in 2012, a decrease of 21%.

(1)

Consolidated subsidiaries, excluding fixed margins. Effective first quarter 2012, over/under-lifting valued at market prices.

82TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Investments, excluding acquisitions of3.4 billion and including changes in non-current loans of946 million, were21.3 billion in 2013 compared to18.5 billion in 2012, an increase reflecting the investments for the large number of Upstream projects under development.

Acquisitions in 2013 were3.4 billion, comprised essentially of the acquisition of an interest in the Libra field in Brazil, an additional 6% stake in the Ichthys project in Australia, an additional 1.6% stake in Novatek(1), the carry on the Utica gas and condensate field in the United States, and the bonuses for exploration permits in South Africa, Mozambique and Brazil. Acquisitions in 2012 were3.1 billion.

Asset sales in 2013 were3.6 billion, comprised essentially of the sale of TIGF in France, a 25% interest in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy, the interest in the Voyageur upgrader project in Canada, TOTAL’s fertilizer activities in Europe and exploration and production assets in Trinidad & Tobago. Asset sales in 2012 were4.6 billion.

Net investments(2) were19.5 billion in 2013, an increase of 14% compared to17.1 billion in 2012, mainly due to an increase in organic investments in the Upstream segment. Included in 2013 is1.6 billion related to the sale of minority equity interests in Total E&P Congo and Block 14 in Angola, which are shown in the financing section of the cash flow statement of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

See also “— Liquidity and Capital Resources”, below.

Group results 2012 vs. 2011

On average, the oil market environment was stable in 2012 compared to the previous year. For 2012, the average Brent price was $111.7/b compared to $111.3/b in 2011, the average liquids price realization increased by 3% to $107.7/b from $105.0/b in 2011 and the average natural gas price realization the Group’s consolidated subsidiaries increased by 3% to $6.74/MBtu compared to $6.53/MBtu in 2011. In the downstream, the ERMI increased to $36.0/t on average in 2012 compared to $17.4/t in 2011. The euro-dollar exchange rate in 2012 averaged $1.28/ compared to $1.39/ in 2011.

In this context, non-Group sales of TOTAL were200.1 billion in 2012, an increase of 8% from184.7 billion in 2011, essentially due to an increase in non-Group sales of the Refining & Chemicals segment of 18%.

Net income (Group share) in 2012 decreased by 14% to10,609 million from12,309 million in 2011, mainly due to the impacts of the after-tax inventory valuation effect and special items. The after-tax inventory valuation effect (as defined below under “— Analysis of business segment results”) had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of157 million in 2012, and a positive impact of834 million in 2011. The changes in fair value of trading inventories and storage contracts (as defined below under “— Analysis of business segment results”) had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of7 million in 2012 and a positive impact of32 million in 2011. Special items had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of1,503 million in 2012, comprised essentially of an impairment of assets in the Barnett in the United States, provisions for abandonment costs relating to Elgin

in the UK, a one-off tax of 4% on petroleum stocks in France, an impairment of chemicals assets in Europe and a provision related to the progress of discussions between the Department of Justice, the SEC and TOTAL to resolve issues arising from an investigation concerning gas contracts awarded in Iran in the 1990s, which were partially offset by gains on asset sales. Special items had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of14 million in 2011, comprised mainly of1,014 million of impairments (essentially impairments on European refining and renewable energy assets) and1,538 million of gains on asset sales. Special items had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of384 million in 2010, comprised essentially of asset impairments that had a negative impact of1,224 million (essentially impairments on European refining assets) and gains on asset sales that had a positive impact of1,046 million. Effective July 1, 2010, the Group no longer accounts for its interest in Sanofi as an equity affiliate, but treats such interest as a financial asset available for sale in the line “Other investments” of the balance sheet. In 2010, the Group’s share of adjustment items related to Sanofi had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of81 million.

In 2011,2012, income taxes amounted to14,07313,035 million, an increasea decrease of 38%7% compared to10,22814,091 million in 2010,2011, primarily as a result of the increasedecrease in taxable income. The increase in the effective tax rate from 49% in 2010 to 53% in 2011 was mainly due to an increase in the portion

In 2012, TOTAL bought back 1.8 million of its own shares (i.e., 0.08% of the Group’s income before tax attributable to entities with a local tax rate much higher thanshare capital as of December 31, 2012) under the French tax rate (36.10%authorization granted by the shareholders at the meeting of May 11, 2012 (see “Item 10. Share buybacks in 2012”). The portion of the Upstream income before tax represented 89% in 2011, unchanged from 2010.

The Group did not buy back shares in 2011. The number of fully-diluted shares at December 31, 2011,2012, was 2,263.82,270.4 million compared to 2,249.32,263.8 million at December 31, 2010.2011.

Fully-diluted earnings per share, based on 2,2572,267 million weighted-average shares, was5.444.68 in 20112012 compared to4.715.45 in 2010, an increase2011, a decrease of 15%.

(1)Consolidated subsidiaries, excluding fixed margin and buyback contracts.

Group Results 2010 vs. 2009

In 2010, the oil and gas market environment was characterized by increased demand for oil and natural gas products. Crude oil prices were relatively stable during 2010, with an average Brent oil price of $79.5/b, an increase of 29% compared to $61.7/b in 2009. In 2010, TOTAL’s average liquids price realization increased 31% to $76.3/b from $58.1/b in 2009, in line with the increase in the average Brent price of oil. TOTAL’s average natural gas price realization(1) decreased to $5.15/MBtu in 2010 from $5.17/MBtu in 2009. The average euro-dollar exchange rate was 1.33 $/ on average in 2010 compared to 1.39 $/ in 2009.

Refining margins rebounded in 2010 from historically low levels in 2009. For the full year 2010, the Group’s ERMI was $27.4/t, an increase of 54% compared to $17.8/t in 2009.

For the full year 2010, the Chemicals segment benefited from a strong rebound in demand and margins in the Base Chemicals division’s market, as well as an increase in demand in the Specialties Chemicals division’s market.

Consolidated sales of TOTAL were159.3 billion in 2010, an increase of 21% from131.3 billion in 2009, as a result of an increase in non-Group sales in the Upstream, Downstream and Chemicals segments of 15%, 23% and 19%, respectively.

Reported net income (Group share) in 2010 increased by 25% to10,571 million from8,447 million in 2009, mainly due to the increase in hydrocarbon prices and production, as well as a rebound in the Chemicals segment. The after-tax impact of prices on inventory valuation accounted for in the Downstream and Chemicals segments had a positive impact on net income (Group share) of748 million in 2010 and a positive impact of1,533 million in 2009, in each case due to the increase in oil prices. For a discussion of the impact of prices on inventory valuation in the Downstream and Chemicals segments see “— Business Segment Reporting” below. Special items had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of384 million in 2010, comprised essentially of asset impairments that had a negative impact of1,224 million and gains on asset sales that had a positive impact of1,046 million. Special items had a negative impact of570 million in 2009. Effective July 1, 2010, the Group no longer accounts for its interest in Sanofi as an equity affiliate, but treats such interest as a financial asset available for sale in the line “Other investments” of the balance sheet. The Group’s share of adjustment items

related to Sanofi had a negative impact on net income (Group share) of81 million in 2010 (six months) and a negative impact of300 million in 2009 (full year)14%.

In 2010, income taxes amounted toInvestments, excluding acquisitions of10,2283.1 billion and including changes in non-current loans of664 million, an increase of 32%were18.5 billion in 2012 compared to7,75114.8 billion in 2009, primarily as a result of the increase in taxable income. The increase in the effective tax rate from 47% in 2009 to 49% in 2010 was mainly2011, due to an increase in the portioninvestments relating to new Upstream projects under development.

Acquisitions in 2012 were3.1 billion, comprised essentially of the Group income before tax attributable to entities with a local tax rate much higher thanacquisition of interests in exploration and production licenses in Uganda, an additional 1.3% stake in Novatek(3), various exploration licenses, the French tax rate (34.43%). The portionminority interest in Fina Antwerp Olefins and the carry agreement in the Utica shale gas and condensates field in the United States. Acquisitions in 2011 were8.8 billion.

Asset sales in 2012 were4.6 billion, comprised essentially of sales of the remainder of the Group’s shares of Sanofi, a stake in the Gassled pipeline in Norway, Upstream income before tax represented 89%assets in 2010 compared with 82%Nigeria, the UK, Colombia and France, as well as interests in 2009, with a corresponding impact onPec-Rhin and Geostock in France and in Composites One in the Group effective tax rate.United States. Asset sales in 2011 were7.7 billion.

The Group did not buy back sharesNet investments were17.1 billion in 2010. The number of fully-diluted shares at December 31, 2010, was 2,249.3 million compared to 2,243.7 million at December 31, 2009.

Fully-diluted earnings per share, based on 2,244.5 million weighted-average shares, was4.71 in 2010,2012 compared to3.7816.0 billion in 2009,2011, an increase of 25%7%.

See also “— Liquidity and Capital Resources”, below.

Business Segment Reportingsegment reporting

The financial information for each business segment is reported on the same basis as that used internally by the chief operating decision maker in assessing segment performance and the allocation of segment resources. Due to their particular nature or significance, certain transactions qualified as “special items” are excluded from the business segment figures. In general, special items relate to transactions that are significant, infrequent or unusual. However, in certain instances, certain transactions such as restructuring costs or asset disposals, which are not considered to be representative of the normal course of business, may be qualified as special items although they may have occurred in prior years or are likely to recur in following years.

(1)

The Group’s interest in Novatek was 17% at December 31, 2013.

(2)

“Net investments” = investments including acquisitions and changes in non-current loans – asset sales – other transactions with minority interests.

(3)

The Group’s interest in Novatek was 15.3% at December 31, 2012.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.83


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

In accordance with IAS 2, the Group values inventories of petroleum products in the financial statements according to the FIFO (First-In, First-Out)First-In, First-Out (FIFO) method and other inventories using the weighted-average cost method. Under the FIFO method, the cost of inventory is based on the historic cost of acquisition or manufacture rather than the current replacement cost. In volatile energy markets, this can have a significant distorting effect on the reported income. Accordingly, the adjusted results of the Downstream segmentRefining & Chemicals and Chemicals segmentMarketing & Services segments are presented according to the replacement cost method in order to facilitate the comparability of the Group’s results

(1)Consolidated subsidiaries, excluding fixed margin and buyback contracts.

with those of its competitors and to help illustrate the operating performance of these segments excluding the impact of oil price changes on the replacement of inventories. In the replacement cost method, which approximates the LIFO (Last-In, First-Out)Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method, the variation of inventory values in the statement of income is, depending on the nature of the inventory, determined using either the month-end prices differential between one period and another or the average prices of the period. The inventory valuation effect is the difference between the results under the FIFO and replacement cost methods.

As from January 1, 2011, the effect of changes in fair value presented as an adjustment item reflects, for trading inventories and storage contracts, differences between internal measures of performance used by TOTAL’s management and the accounting for these transactions under IFRS. IFRS requires that trading inventories be recorded at their fair value using period-end spot prices. In order to best reflect the management of economic exposure through derivative transactions, internal indicators used to measure performance include valuations of trading inventories recorded at their fair value based on forward prices. Furthermore, TOTAL, in its trading activities, enters into storage contracts, the future effects of which are recorded at fair value in the Group’s internal economic performance. IFRS, by requiring accounting for storage contracts on an accrual basis, precludes recognition of this fair value effect.

Until June 30, 2010, the Group also adjusted for its equity share of adjustment items related to Sanofi. As of July 1, 2010, Sanofi is no longer accounted for as an equity affiliate (but is instead treated as a financial asset available for sale in the line “Other investments” of the balance sheet).

The adjusted business segment results (adjusted operating income and adjusted net operating income) are defined as replacement cost results, adjusted for special items, excluding (as from January 1, 2011) the effect of changes in fair value as from January 1, 2011.value. For further information on the adjustments affecting operating income on a segment-by-segment basis, and for a reconciliation of segment figures to figures reported in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Group measures performance at the segment level on the basis of net operating income and adjusted net operating income. Net operating income comprises operating income of the relevant segment after deducting the amortization and the depreciation of intangible assets other than leasehold rights, translation adjustments and gains or losses on the sale of assets, as well as all other income and expenses related to capital employed (dividends from non-consolidated companies, income from equity affiliates and capitalized interest expenses) and after income taxes applicable to the above. The income and expenses not included in net operating income that are included in net income are interest expenses related to long-term liabilities net of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents, after applicable income taxes (net cost of net debt and non-controlling interests). Adjusted net operating income excludes the effect of the adjustments (special items and the inventory valuation effect) described above. For further

discussion of the calculation of net operating income and the calculation of return on average capital employed (ROACE)(ROACE(1)), see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Upstream segment results

 

(M)  2011 2010 2009  2013 2012 2011 

Non-Group sales

   23,298    18,527    16,072    19,855    22,143    22,211  

Operating income(a)

   22,444    17,450    12,858    17,061    20,261    22,618  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   1,596    1,533    846    2,027    2,325    2,198  

Tax on net operating income

   (13,506  (10,131  (7,486  (10,321  (12,359  (13,576

Net operating income(a)

   10,534    8,852    6,218    8,767    10,227    11,240  

Adjustments affecting net operating income

   (129  (255  164    603    918    (609

Adjusted net operating income(b)

   10,405    8,597    6,382    9,370    11,145    10,631  

Investments

   21,689    13,208    9,855    22,396    19,618    20,662  

Divestments

   2,656    2,067    398    4,353    2,798    2,591  

ROACE

   20%    21%    18%    14%    18%    21%  

 

(a)

For the definition of operating income and net operating income, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)

Adjusted for special items. See Notes 2 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

(1)

ROACE = adjusted net operating income divided by average capital employed.

2011 vs. 20102013 vs. 2012

Upstream segment sales (excluding sales to other segments) increased by 26%were19,855 million in 2013 compared to23,29822,143 million in 2011 from18,527 million in 2010, reflecting essentially the impact2012, a decrease of higher hydrocarbon prices.10%.

Oil and gasHydrocarbon production averaged 2,3462,299 kboe/d in 2011,2013, stable compared to 2,378 kboe/d in 2010. This 1.3% decrease was due2012, essentially to theas a result ofof:

+2.5% for start-ups and growth from new projects;

-1% for normal decline, net of production ramp-ups on new projects (-1.5%), security conditions, mainly in Libya (-1.5%) and the price effect(1) (-2%), partially offset by changeslower maintenance, the restart of production from Elgin/Franklin in the UK North Sea and OML 58 in Nigeria;

-0.5% for portfolio (+2.5%; integrating the net share of Novatek production and the impact ofchanges, including mainly the sale of interests in CEPSA)Nigeria, the UK, Colombia, and Trinidad & Tobago, net of higher production corresponding to the end of OPEC reductions (+1%).increased stake in Novatek; and

-1% for security issues in Nigeria and Libya, partially offset by improved security conditions in Yemen.

Proved reserves based on SEC rules were 11,42311,526 Mboe at December 31, 20112013 (Brent at $110.96/$108.02/b), compared to 10,69511,368 Mboe at December 31, 20102012 (Brent at $79.02/$111.13/b). Based on the 20112013 average rate of production, reserve life is more than thirteen years.

See “Item 4. Information on the Company — Exploration & Production — Reserves” for a discussion of proved reserves and “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)” contained elsewhere herein for additional information on proved reserves, including tables showing changes in proved reserves by region.

Upstream net operating income in 20112013 amounted to10,5348,767 million (for 2010,2012,8,85210,227 million) from operating income of22,44417,061 million (for 2010,2012,17,45020,261 million), with the difference between net operating income and operating income resulting primarily from taxes on net operating income of13,50610,321 million (for 2010,2012, tax charge of10,13112,359 million), partially offset by income from equity affiliates and other items of1,5962,027 million (for 2010,2012, income of1,5332,325 million). The increase in net operating income in 2011 compared to 2010 was due primarily to the impact of higher hydrocarbon prices.

(1)

ROACE = adjusted net operating income divided by average capital employed.

84TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Adjusted net operating income for the Upstream segment was10,4059,370 million in 20112013 compared to8,59711,145 million in 2010, an increase2012, a decrease of 21%, essentially16% mainly due to a less favorable production mix, higher technical costs, particularly for exploration, and a higher tax rate for the impact of higher hydrocarbon prices partially offset by the impact of the mix effect, changes in foreign exchange rates and increased costs, exploration expenses and taxes. Technical costs for consolidated subsidiaries, in accordance with ASC 932(2) were $18.9/boe(3) in 2011, compared to $16.6/boe in 2010, mainly due toUpstream segment.

depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) charges related notably to the start-up of new projects and increased operating expenses per barrel.

Adjusted net operating income for the Upstream segment excludes special items. In 2011, theThe exclusion of special items had a negativepositive impact of129 million on Upstream adjusted net operating income in 2013 of603 million, comprised mainly of the loss on the sale of the Voyageur upgrader project in Canada (1,247 million) and the impairment of Upstream assets (442 million), principally in the Barnett field in the United States and in Syria, partially offset by the gain on the sales of TIGF and Upstream assets in Italy, and a positive impact of918 million in 2012, consisting essentially of an impairment of assets in the Barnett in the United States and provisions for abandonment costs relating to Elgin in the UK.

The effective tax rate for the Upstream segment in 2013 was 60.1% in 2013 compared to 58.4% in 2012. The year 2012 was marked by favorable one-off items, such as year-end tax adjustments and the reversal of a negative impactnon-deductible loss.

Technical costs for consolidated subsidiaries, in accordance with ASC 932(1) were $26.1/boe in 2013 compared to $22.8/boe in 2012, notably due to increased depreciation of255 million in 2010, in both cases comprised principally of capital gains on asset sales partially offset by asset impairments. tangible assets relating to major project start-ups as well as increased exploration expenses.

The Upstream segment’s total capital expenditures increased by 64%14% to21,68922,396 million in 20112013 from13,20819,618 million in 2010. Capital expenditures excluding acquisitions2012, essentially due to the large number of Upstream projects under development. The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production subsidiaries’ development investments amounted to16 billion in 2011 mainly included projects2013, primarily in the following countries:Norway, Angola, Australia, Nigeria, Norway, Australia, Kazakhstan, theCanada, United Kingdom, Canada, Indonesia, Gabon, the Republic of the Congo, andGabon, Indonesia, Russia, the United States.States and Kazakhstan. Divestments by the Upstream segment were4,353 million in 2013 compared to2,798 million in 2012, an increase of 56%.

ROACE for the Upstream segment decreasedwas 14% for the full-year 2013 compared to 20% in 2011 from 21% in 2010. The decrease was mainly18% for the full-year 2012, due to thelower operating results and an increase in capital employed in 2011.employed.

2010 vs. 2009

2012 vs. 2011

Upstream segment sales (excluding sales to other segments) increased by 15%were22,143 million in 2012 compared to18,52722,211 million in 2010 from16,072 million in 2009, reflecting essentially the impact of higher hydrocarbon prices and production growth.2011.

Oil and gasHydrocarbon production averaged 2,3782,300 kboe/d in 2010,2012 compared to 2,2812,346 kboe/d in 2009.2011. This 4.3% increase2% decrease was essentially thea result of productionof:

+4.5% for start-ups and ramp-ups onfrom new projects, net of theprojects;

-4% for normal decline, and a lower level of turnarounds (+3%),decline;

+1.5% for changes in the portfolio, (+2%), lower OPEC reductionscomprised essentially of an increased share of Novatek production and an increasethe impact of the sale of CEPSA and assets in gas demand (+1.5%)the UK, France, Nigeria and improvedCameroon;

-2% for incidents at Elgin in the UK North Sea and Ibewa in Nigeria;

-1.5% for disruptions related to security conditions in Nigeria (+1%), partially offset byYemen and the priceproduction shut-down in Syria, net of the positive effect (-3%).of the return of production in Libya; and

-0.5% for the price effect(2).

Proved reserves based on SEC rules were 10,69511,368 Mboe at December 31, 20102012 (Brent at $79.02/$111.13/b), compared to 10,48311,423 Mboe at December 31, 20092011 (Brent at $59.91/$110.96/b). AtBased on the 20102012 average rate of production, reserve life wasis more than twelvethirteen years.

See “Item 4. Information on the Company — Exploration & Production — Reserves” for a discussion of proved reserves and “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)” contained

elsewhere herein for additional information on proved reserves, including tables showing changes in proved reserves by region.

Upstream net operating income in 2012 amounted to10,227 million (for 2011,11,240 million) from operating income of20,261 million (for 2011,22,618 million), with the difference between net operating income and operating income resulting primarily from taxes on net operating income of12,359 million (for 2011, tax charge of13,576 million), partially offset by income from equity affiliates and other items of2,325 million (for 2011, income of2,198 million).

Adjusted net operating income for the Upstream segment was11,145 million in 2012 compared to10,631 million in 2011, an increase of 5% essentially due to the more favorable euro/dollar exchange rate and the decrease in the effective tax rate for the Upstream segment partially mitigated by the decrease in hydrocarbon production and increased technical costs.

Adjusted net operating income for the Upstream segment excludes special items. The exclusion of special items had a positive impact on Upstream adjusted net operating income in 2012 of918 million, consisting essentially of an impairment of assets in the Barnett in the United States (737 million) and provisions for abandonment costs relating to Elgin in the UK (217 million), and a negative impact of609 million in 2011, consisting essentially of gains on the sales of the Group’s interests in CEPSA, the Ocensa pipeline in Colombia and the Gassled pipeline in Norway.

The effective tax rate for the Upstream segment in 2012 was 58.4% in 2012 compared to 60.4% in 2011. The year 2012 was marked by favorable one-off items, such as year-end tax adjustments and the reversal of a non-deductible loss.

Technical costs for consolidated subsidiaries, in accordance with ASC 932(1) were $22.8/boe(3) in 2012, compared to $18.9/boe in 2011, mainly due to increased depreciations of tangible assets relating to Pazflor, Halfaya, and Usan, as well as increased exploration expenses.

The Upstream segment’s total capital expenditures decreased by 5% to19,618 million in 2012 from20,662 million in 2011, mainly due to lower acquisitions. The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production subsidiaries’ development investments amounted to14 billion in 2012, primarily in Angola, Norway, Canada, Australia, Nigeria, the United Kingdom, Gabon, Kazakhstan, Indonesia, the Republic of the Congo, the United States and Russia. Divestments by the Upstream segment were2,798 million in 2012 compared to2,591 million in 2011, an increase of 8%.

ROACE for the Upstream segment was 18% for the full-year 2012 compared to 21% for the full-year 2011, due essentially to higher average capital employed in 2012.

 

 

 

(1)

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive industries — Oil and Gas.

(2)

The “price effect” refers to the impact of changing hydrocarbon prices on entitlement volumes from production sharing and buyback contracts. For example, as the price of oil or gas increases above certain pre-determined levels, TOTAL’s share of production normally decreases.

(2)(3)

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive industries — Oil and Gas.

(3)Excluding IAS 36 (impairment of assets).

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.85


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Refining & Chemicals segment results

(M)  2013  2012  2011 

Non-Group sales

   86,204    91,117    77,146  

Operating income(a)

   132    1,050    756  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   143    213    647  

Tax on net operating income

   (460  (263  (138

Net operating income(a)

   (185  1,000    1,265  

Adjustments affecting net operating income

   1,589    376    (423

Adjusted net operating income(b)

   1,404    1,376    842  

Investments

   2,039    1,944    1,910  

Divestments

   275    304    2,509  

ROACE

   9%    9%    5%  

(a)

For the definition of operating income and net operating income, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)

Adjusted for special items and the inventory valuation effect. See Notes 2 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2013 vs. 2012

UpstreamRefining & Chemicals segment sales (excluding sales to other segments) were86,204 million in 2013 compared to91,117 million in 2012, a decrease of 5%.

For the full-year 2013, the ERMI was $17.9/t, a decrease of 50% compared to 2012. Petrochemical margins remained at high levels, particularly in the United States.

Refinery throughput for the full-year 2013 decreased by 4% compared to the previous year, reflecting essentially a turnaround at the Antwerp refinery, higher maintenance at the Donges refinery, voluntary shutdowns in response to weak refining margins in late 2013 and the closure of the Rome refinery at the end of the third quarter 2012.

The net operating income of the Refining & Chemicals segment in 2010 amounted2013 decreased to8,852(185) million (for 2009,2012,6,2181,000 million) from operating income of17,450132 million (for 2009,2012,12,8581,050 million), with the difference between net operating income and operating income resulting primarily from taxes on net operating income of10,131460 million (for 2009,2012, tax charge of7,486263 million), partially offset by income from equity affiliates and other items of1,533143 million (for 2009,2012, income of846213 million). The increase in net operating income in 2010 compared to 2009 was due primarily to the impact of higher hydrocarbon prices and production growth.

Over the full year 2010, adjusted net operating income for the Upstream segment was8,597 million compared to6,382 million in 2009, an increase of 35%, essentially due to hydrocarbon prices (+2.3 billion). Technical costs for consolidated subsidiaries, in accordance with ASC 932 were $16.6/boe in 2010, compared to $15.4/boe in 2009, mainly due to depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) charges related notably to the start-up of new projects and increased operating expenses per barrel.

Adjusted net operating income for the UpstreamRefining & Chemicals segment excludes special items. In 2010,in 2013 was1,404 million, an increase of 2% compared to1,376 million in 2012 despite the exclusion50% decrease in refining margins. The increase was due in part to the tangible results realized from the implementation of special items (comprised principally of capital gains on asset sales partiallyplanned synergies and operational efficiencies and to a more favorable environment for petrochemicals, which offset by asset impairments) had a negative impact ofthe sharp decline in European refining margins.

255 million on adjustedAdjusted net operating income for the UpstreamRefining & Chemicals segment compared toexcludes any after-tax inventory valuation effect and special items. The exclusion of the inventory valuation effect had a positive impact on Refining & Chemicals adjusted net operating income in 2013 of495 million and a positive impact of164116 million in 2009 (comprised principally2012. The exclusion of asset impairmentsspecial items had a positive impact on Refining & Chemicals adjusted net operating income in 2013 of1,094 million, reflecting mainly charges and other elements).write-offs related to the restructuring of downstream activities in France, and a positive impact of260 million in 2012, reflecting mainly an impairment on European chemicals assets.

In addition, the SATORP integrated refinery in Saudi Arabia has begun to export refined products after the successful start-up of its first units.

The Upstream segment’s total capital expenditures increasedInvestments by 34%the Refining & Chemicals segment were2,039 million in 2013 compared to13,2081,944 million in 2010 from2012, an increase of 5%. Divestments by the Refining & Chemicals segment were9,855275 million in 2009. The capital expenditures2013 compared to304 million in 2010 mainly included projects in the following countries: Angola, the United States, Nigeria, Canada, Norway, Kazakhstan, Australia, the United Kingdom, Indonesia, the Republic2012, a decrease of the Congo, Libya, Gabon and Thailand.10%.

ROACE for the UpstreamRefining & Chemicals segment increased to 21% in 2010 from 18% in 2009. The increase was mainly due9% for the full-year 2013, stable compared to the adjusted net operating income having increased, principally due to increased hydrocarbon prices and production.full-year 2012.

Downstream results

(M)  2011  2010  2009 

Non-Group sales

   141,907    123,245    100,518  

Operating income(a)

   1,694    982    2,237  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   401    141    169  

Tax on net operating income

   (409  (201  (633

Net operating income(a)

   1,686    922    1,773  

Adjustments affecting net operating income

   (603  246    (820

Adjusted net operating income(b)

   1,083    1,168    953  

Investments

   1,870    2,343    2,771  

Divestments

   3,235    499    133  

ROACE

   7%    8%    7%  

 

(a)For the definition of operating income and net operating income, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b)

Adjusted for special items and the inventory valuation effect. See Notes 2 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.2012 vs. 2011

2011 vs. 2010

For the full year 2011, the Group’s European Refining Margin Indicator (ERMI) was $17.4/t, a decrease of 36% compared to 2010.

Downstream& Chemicals segment sales (excluding sales to other segments) were141,90791,117 million in 2012 compared to77,146 million in 2011, compared to123,245 million in 2010, an increase of 15% essentially18%.

For the full-year 2012, the ERMI was $36.0/t, more than double the average during 2011. This increase in 2012 was mainly due to high levels of planned maintenance in the impact of higher hydrocarbon prices.refining sector, particularly in Europe during the 2012 summer.

Refined product sales (including trading operations) were 3,639Refinery throughput in 2012 was 1,786 kb/d, a 4% decrease compared to 1,863 kb/d in 2011, a decrease of 4% compared to 3,776 kb/d in 2010. Refinery throughput in 2011 was 1,863 kb/d, a 7% decrease compared to 2,009 kb/d in 2010reflecting essentially duethe portfolio effect relating to the sale of the Group’s interest in CEPSA at the end of July 2011 and a higher levelthe closure of major turnarounds than in

2010. In 2011, major turnarounds took place in the Antwerp, Grandpuits, Leuna, Lindsey and Port ArthurRome refinery at the end of the third quarter 2012. Excluding these portfolio effects, throughput increased by 4% due to increased availability of the Group’s refineries. For the full year 2011,full-year 2012, the refinery utilization rate based on crude throughput was 78% (83%82% (86% for crude and other feedstock) compared to 73%78% in 2010 (77%2011 (83% for crude and other feedstock). In 2010,As in 2011, 2012 was marked by high levels of planned maintenance at European refineries, in particular the utilization rate was impacted by the shutdowntemporary shut-down of the Dunkirk refinery and a distillation unit at the Normandy refinery during the upgrading project at the end of 2012, as well as impacts from strikesscheduled maintenance at the Provence and Feyzin refineries in France.

In 2011, DownstreamThe net operating income increasedof the Refining & Chemicals segment in 2012 decreased to1,6861,000 million (for 2010,2011,9221,265 million) from operating income of1,6941,050 million (for 2010,2011,982756 million), with the difference between net operating income and operating income resulting primarily from taxes on net operating income of409263 million (for 2010,2011, tax charge of201138 million), partially

substantially offset by income from equity affiliates and other items of401213 million (for 2010,2011, income of141647 million). The increase in net operating income in 2011 compared to 2010 was due primarily to the impact of higher hydrocarbon prices, gains on asset sales and lower impairment charges.

The Downstream segment’s adjusted net operating income in 2011 was1,083 million compared to1,168 million in 2010. The decrease was essentially due to the negative impact of the deterioration in refining margins in 2011.

Adjusted net operating income for the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals segment in 2012 was1,376 million, an increase of 63% compared to842 million in 2011. This increase was mainly due to the positive effect of improved refining margins in Europe, noting that throughput at the Group’s refineries decreased on a global basis by 4% between the two periods, and the petrochemical environment weakened, particularly in Europe and in polymers. The 10% decrease in adjusted net operating income for Specialty Chemicals from424 million in 2011 to383 million in 2012 is attributable entirely to the sale of the resins business in mid-2011. Excluding this portfolio effect, the adjusted net operating income for the Specialty Chemicals would have increased slightly.

Adjusted net operating income for the Refining & Chemicals segment excludes any after-tax inventory valuation effect and special items. The adjustment forexclusion of the inventory valuation effect had a negativepositive impact on DownstreamRefining & Chemicals adjusted net operating income in 20112012 of859116 million compared to a negative impact of640669 million in 2010.2011. The exclusion of special items (comprised essentiallyhad a positive impact on Refining & Chemicals adjusted net operating income in

86TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

2012 of impairments260 million, reflecting mainly an impairment on European refiningchemicals assets, (as described below), partially offset by gains on asset sales) in 2011 hadand a positive impact of256246 million on adjusted net operating income. In 2010, the exclusion of special items (comprised essentially ofin 2011, reflecting mainly impairments on European refining assets partially offset by gains on asset sales) had a positive impact of886 million on adjusted net operating income.

The persistence of an unfavorable economic environment for refining, affecting Europe in particular, led the Group to recognize an impairment in the Downstream segment on European refining assets in the third and fourth quarters of 2011 in the amount of700 million in operating income and478 million in net income. These elements have been treated as adjustment items.assets.

Investments by the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals segment were1,8701,944 million in 2012 compared to1,910 million in 2011, an increase of 2%. Divestments by the Refining & Chemicals segment were304 million in 2012 compared to2,509 million in 2011, a decrease of 20% compared to2,343 million in 2010. Divestments by the Downstream segment were3,235 million in 2011, comprised essentially of the Group’s stake in CEPSA and certain distribution activities in the United Kingdom, compared to499 million in 2010.88%.

ROACE for the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals segment was 7% in 20119% for 2012 compared to 8%5% for 2011, due essentially to higher adjusted net operating income in 2010.2012.

2010 vs. 2009Marketing & Services segment results

(M)  2013  2012  2011 

Non-Group sales

   83,481    86,614    85,325  

Operating income(a)

   1,491    1,058    1,469  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   39    (198  (377

Tax on net operating income

   (413  (380  (441

Net operating income(a)

   1,117    480    651  

Adjustments affecting net operating income

   34    350    171  

Adjusted net operating income(b)

   1,151    830    822  

Investments

   1,365    1,301    1,834  

Divestments

   141    152    1,955  

ROACE

   16%    12%    13%  

(a)

For the definition of operating income and net operating income, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)

Adjusted for special items and the inventory valuation effect. See Notes 2 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2013 vs. 2012

For the full year 2010,full-year 2013, the Group’s ERMI was $27.4/t, an increase of 54% compared to 2009.

Downstream segmentMarketing & Services segment’s sales, (excludingexcluding intra-Group sales, to other segments) were123,24583,481 million, in 2010, an increase of 23% from100,518 million in 2009.

Refined product sales (including trading operations) were 3,776 kb/d in 2010, an increasea decrease of 4% compared to 3,6162012.

Refined product sales(1) were 1,749 kb/d in 2009. Refinery throughput in 2010 was 2,009 kb/d, a 7% decrease2013 compared to 2,1511,710 kb/d in

2009. For 2012, an increase of 2% due to growth in Africa and the full year 2010, the refinery utilization rate based on crude throughput was 73% (77% for crude and other feedstock) compared to 78%Americas, partially offset by a decrease in 2009 (83% for crude and other feedstock), reflecting essentially the shutdown of the Dunkirk refinery and a distillation unit at the Normandy refinery as well as impacts from strikes in France. In 2010, the level of scheduled turnarounds for refinery maintenance was low, with turnaround activity expected to increase notably in 2011.Europe.

In 2010, Downstream netNet operating income decreased tofor the Marketing & Services segment in 2013 was9221,117 million (for 2009,2012,1,773480 million) from an operating income of9821,491 million (for 2009,2012,2,2371,058 million), with the difference between net operating income and operating income resulting primarily from taxes on net operating income of201413 million (for 2009,2012, tax charge of633380 million), partially offset by and income from equity affiliates and other items of14139 million (for 2009,2011, loss of169198 million). The decrease in net operating income in 2010 compared to 2009 was due primarily to the impairment charge for French and UK refining assets referred to below.

The Downstream segment’s adjusted net operating income in 2010 was1,168 million compared to953 million in 2009. The increase was essentially due to the positive impact of the refining margin improvement, which was partially offset by lower throughput and reliability of the Group’s refineries in 2010 and less favorable conditions for supply optimization.

Adjusted net operating income forfrom the DownstreamMarketing & Services segment excludes any after-tax inventory valuation effect and special items. The adjustment for the inventory valuation effect had a negative impact on Downstream adjusted net operating income in 2010 of640 million compared to a negative impact of1,285 million in 2009. The exclusion of special items (comprised essentially of impairments on European refining assets (as described below), partially offset by gains on asset sales) in 2010 had a positive impact of886 million on adjusted net operating income. In 2009, the exclusion of special items (relating mainly to refining asset impairments and other elements) had a positive impact of465 million on adjusted net operating income.

The persistence of an unfavorable economic environment for refining, affecting Europe in particular, led the Group to recognize an impairment in the Downstream segment, essentially on French and UK refining assets, in the fourth quarter 2010 in the amount of1,192 million in operating income and913 million in net operating income. These elements have been treated as adjustment items.

Investments by the Downstream segment were2,343 million in 2010, compared to2,771 million in 2009.

ROACE for the Downstream segment was 8% in 2010 compared to 7% in 2009.

Chemicals results

(M)  2011  2010  2009 

Non-Group sales

   19,477    17,490    14,726  

Operating income(a)

   658    964    553  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   471    215    (58

Tax on net operating income

   (225  (267  (92

Net operating income(a)

   904    912    403  

Adjustments affecting net operating income

   (129  (55  (131

Adjusted net operating income(b)

   775    857    272  

Investments

   847    641    631  

Divestments

   1,164    347    47  

ROACE

   10%    12%    4%  

(a)For the definition of operating income and net operating income, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b)Adjusted for special items and the inventory valuation effect. See Notes 2 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2011 vs. 2010

For the full year 2011, Chemicals segment sales, excluding intra-Group sales, were19,477 million, an increase of 11% compared to17,490 million for 2010, reflecting essentially the globally favorable environment in the first half 2011, which has since deteriorated.

In 2011, net operating income for the Chemicals segment2013 was904 million (for 2010,912 million) from an operating income of658 million (for 2010,964 million), with the difference between net operating income and operating income resulting primarily from income from equity affiliates and other items of471 million (for 2010, income of215 million) offset by taxes on net operating income of225 million (for 2010, a tax loss of267 million). The decrease in 2011 in net operating income compared to 2010 was due primarily to the sale of the Group’s stake in CEPSA and a portion of the Resins activities.

The adjusted net operating income for the Chemicals segment in 2011 was7751,151 million compared to857830 million in 2010, due2012, an increase of 39% reflecting essentially to the impactimprovement in the performance of the sale ofNew Energies, which had particularly negative results in 2012, as well as the Group’s interestoverall improvement made in CEPSA and a portion of the Resins activities. The adjusted net operating income for the Base Chemicals division decreased from393 millionrefined products marketing, particularly in 2010 to373 million in 2011. Globally, for the full-year 2011, the Base Chemicals division benefited from ramp-ups in its activities in Qatar and South Korea, but suffered from deteriorating margins in the second half of the year in Europe and in the United States. The Specialty Chemicals division, excluding the effect of changes in the portfolio, maintained results at a level close to the 2010 level, with an adjusted net operating income in 2011 of426 million compared to475 million in 2010.emerging markets.

Adjusted net operating income for the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment excludes any after-tax inventory valuation effect and special items. The exclusion of the inventory valuation effect had a negativepositive impact on ChemicalsMarketing & Services adjusted net operating

income of1047 million in 2011, compared to2013 and a

negative positive impact of11339 million in 2010. In 2011, the2012. The exclusion of special items had a negative impact on ChemicalsMarketing & Services adjusted net operating income in 2013 of11913 million where special items consisted essentially of gains on asset sales. In 2010, the exclusion of special items hadcompared to a positive impact on Chemicals adjusted net operating incomein 2012 of58 million.311 million, reflecting mainly impairments and restructuring charges in New Energies.

Investments by the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment increased 32%5% to8471,365 million in 20112013 compared to6411,301 million in 2010.2012. Divestments by the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment were1,164141 million in 2011, comprised essentially of the sale of the Group’s stake in CEPSA and certain Resins activities,2013 compared to347152 million in 2010.2012, a decrease of 7%.

ROACE for the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment was 10% in 201116% for the full-year 2013 compared to 12% in 2010, due essentially to a decrease in adjusted net operating income infor the full-year 2012.

2012 vs. 2011 compared to 2010.

2010 vs. 2009

For the full year 2010, Chemicals segmentfull-year 2012, the Marketing & Services segment’s sales, excluding intra-Group sales, were17,49086,614 million, an increase of 19%2% compared to 2009.85,325 million for 2011.

In 2010, netRefined product sales(2) were 1,710 kb/d in 2012 compared to 1,987 kb/d in 2011, a decrease of 14% almost entirely attributable to the sale of the Group’s interest in CEPSA and the sale of marketing activities in the UK. Excluding these portfolio effects, sales would have decreased by 1% on an annual basis with a notable decrease in Europe (3%) partially offset by increased sales in Asia and the Middle East.

Net operating income for the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment in 2012 was912480 million (for 2009,2011,403651 million) from an operating income of9641,058 million (for 2009,2011,5531,469 million), with the difference between net operating income and operating income resulting primarily from taxes on net operating income of

380 million (for 2011, tax charge of441 million) and income from equity affiliates and other items of negative215198 million (for 2009, a2011, loss of58377 million) offset by a loss from taxes on.

Adjusted net operating income of267 million (for 2009, a tax loss of92 million).

The adjusted net operating income forfrom the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment in 2010 was857830 million in 2012, an increase of 1% compared to272822 million in 2009. The adjusted net operating income for2011. This increase is explained principally by the Base Chemicals division increased by377 million from 2009improved performance of New Energies. Marketing activities continued to 2010,provide stable results despite sales volumes generally decreasing, due to, anin particular, improved environmentresults from activities in the Asia-Pacific and the ramp-up of new production units in Qatar. In 2010, the Specialties Chemicals division benefited from strong operational performance and good positioning in growth markets.Eastern European regions.

Adjusted net operating income for the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment excludes any after-tax inventory valuation effect and special items. The exclusion of the inventory valuation effect had a negativepositive impact on ChemicalsMarketing & Services adjusted net operating income of11339 million in 2010,2012 compared to a negative impact of254200 million in 2009. In 2010, the2011. The exclusion of special items had a positive impact on ChemicalsMarketing & Services adjusted net operating income in 2012 of58 million. In 2009, the exclusion of special items (comprised primarily of

asset impairments311 million and other elements) had a positive impact on Chemicals adjusted net operating incomein 2011 of123 million.371 million, in both cases reflecting mainly impairments and restructuring charges in New Energies.

Investments by the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment increaseddecreased 29% to6411,301 million in 20102012 compared to6311,834 million in 2009.

ROACE for2011, reflecting essentially the Chemicalsacquisition of a majority interest in SunPower in 2011. Divestments by the Marketing & Services segment was 12%were152 million in 20102012 compared to 4%1,955 million in 2009 due principally to2011, comprised essentially of the significant increasesale of the Group’s stake in adjusted net operating income.CEPSA.

 

 

(1)

Excludes trading and bulk refining sales, which are reported under the Refining & Chemicals segment.

(2)

Excludes trading and bulk refining sales, which are reported under the Refining & Chemicals segment; includes share of TotalErg.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.87


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

ROACE for the Marketing & Services segment was 12% for 2012 compared to 13% for 2011.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

 

(M)  2011  2010  2009 

Cash flow from operating activities

   19,536    18,493    12,360  

Including (increase) decrease in working capital

   (1,739  (496  (3,316

Cash flow used in investing activities

   (15,963)   (11,957)   (10,268) 

Total expenditures

   (24,541  (16,273  (13,349

Total divestments

   8,578    4,316    3,081  

Cash flow used in financing activities

   (4,309)   (3,348)   (2,868) 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (736)   3,188    (776) 

Effect of exchange rates

   272    (361  117  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

   14,489    11,662    12,321  

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

   14,025    14,489    11,662  

 

(M)  2013  2012  2011 

Cash flow from operating activities

   21,473    22,462    19,536  

Including (increase) decrease in working capital

   1,930    1,084    (1,739

Cash flow used in investing activities

   (21,108  (17,072  (15,963

Total expenditures

   (25,922  (22,943  (24,541

Total divestments

   4,814    5,871    8,578  

Cash flow used in financing activities

   (1,145  (3,745  (4,309

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (780  1,645    (736

Effect of exchange rates

   (42  (201  272  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

   15,469    14,025    14,489  

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

   14,647    15,469    14,025  

TOTAL’s cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and dividend payments over the past three years were financed primarily by a combination of funds generated from operations, borrowings and divestments of non-core assets. In the current environment, TOTAL expects its external debt to be principally financed from the international debt capital markets. The Group continually monitors the balance between cash flow from operating activities and net expenditures. In the Company’s opinion, its working capital is sufficient for its present requirements.

Capital expenditures

The largest part of TOTAL’s capital expenditures in 20112013 was made up of additions to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment (approximately 73%86%), with the remainder attributable to equity-method affiliates and to acquisitions of subsidiaries. In the Upstream segment, as described in more detail under “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited) — Costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities”, capital expenditures in 20112013 were principally development costs (approximately 50%75%, mainly for construction of new production facilities), exploration expenditures (successful or unsuccessful, approximately 5%6%) and acquisitions of proved and unproved properties (approximately 40%14%). In the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals segment, about 55%85% of capital expenditures in 20112013 were related to refining and petrochemical activities (essentially 70%40% for existing units including maintenance and major turnarounds and 30%60% for

new construction), the balance being related to marketing/retail activities and information systems.Specialty Chemicals. In the ChemicalsMarketing & Services segment, capital expenditures related to all activities in 2011 and were split between Base Chemicalsmarketing/retail activities (approximately 60%80%) and Specialties ChemicalsNew Energies (approximately 40%20%). For information on expenditures by business segment, please refer to the discussion of TOTAL’s results for each segment above.

Cash flow

Cash flow from operating activities in 2013 was21,473 million in compared to22,462 million in 2012 and19,536 million in 2011 compared to2011.

18,493 million in 2010 and12,360 million in 2009. The1,043989 million increasedecrease in cash flow from operating activities from 20102012 to 20112013 was due in partessentially to higherlower net income (Group share), which increaseda decrease in gains on disposal of fixed assets and a reduction in depreciation and amortization charges, largely offset by1,705 million over the same period. a reduction in working capital. The cash flow from operating activitiesGroup’s working capital requirement was also affected by the effect of changes in oil and oil product prices on the Group’s working capital requirement.prices. As IFRS rules require TOTAL to account for inventories of petroleum products according to the FIFO method, an increase in oil and oil product prices at the end of the relevant period compared to the beginning of the same period generates, all other factors remaining equal, an increase in inventories and accounts receivable net of an increase in accounts payable, resulting in an increase in working capital requirements. Similarly, a decrease in oil and oil products prices generates a decrease in working capital requirements. In 2011,2013, the Group’s working capital requirement increaseddecreased by1,7391,930 million, due primarilyin part to

reductions in inventory and receivables. In 2012, the increase in oil and oil products prices over the course of the year. In 2010, the increase was ofGroup’s working capital requirement decreased by4961,084 million.

Cash flow used in investing activities in 2013 was21,108 million compared to17,072 million in 2012 and15,963 million in 2011 compared to11,957 million in 2010 and10,268 million in 2009.2011. The increase from 20102012 to 20112013 was due essentially to the higherlower level of acquisitions madeproceeds from disposals of non-current investments in 20112013 as well as to the larger portfolio of upstreamUpstream projects that were under development in 2011.

2013. Total expenditures in 2013 were25,922 million compared to22,943 million in 2012 and24,541 million in 2011, up 51% from16,273 million in 2010, after having increased 22% from13,349 million in 2009.2011. During 2011, 88%2013, 87% of the expenditures were made by the Upstream segment (as compared to 81%86% in 20102012 and 74%84% in 2009)2011), 8% by the Downstream segment (as compared to 14% in 2010 and 21% in 2009) and 3% by theRefining & Chemicals segment (as compared to 4%8% in 20102012 and 2011) and 5% by the Marketing & Services segment (as compared to 6% in 2009)2012 and 7% in 2011). The main source of funding for these expenditures has been cash from operating activities. For additional information on expenditures, please refer to the discussions in “— Overview” and “— Results 2009-2011”2011-2013”.

Divestments, based on selling price and net of cash sold, in 2013 were4,814 million compared to5,871 million in 2012 and8,578 million in 2011, compared to2011. In 2013, the Group’s principal divestments were asset sales of4,3163,572 million, consisting mainly of sales of assets in 2010the Upstream segment in Canada, Italy and Trinidad & Tobago, and the sale of its subsidiary Transport et Infrastructures Gaz France (TIGF). In 2012, the Group’s principal divestments were asset sales of3,0814,586 million, consisting mainly of Sanofi shares and sales of assets in 2009.the Upstream segment in Great Britain, Norway, Nigeria and Colombia. In 2011, the Group’s principal divestments were asset sales of7,705 million, consisting mainly of the Group’s interests in CEPSA, of its Marketing assets in the United Kingdom, of its photocure and coatings resins businesses, of its interests in Total E&P Cameroun and of Sanofi shares. In 2010, the Group’s principal divestments were asset sales of3,452 million, consisting mainly of Sanofi shares and the Group’s interests in the Valhall/Hod fields in Norway and in Block 31 in Angola. In 2009, the Group’s principal divestments were asset sales of2,663 million, consisting mainly of Sanofi shares.

Cash flow used in financing activities in 2013 was1,145 million compared to3,745 million in 2012 and4,309 million in 2011, compared to3,348 million in 2010 and2,868 million in 2009.2011. The increasedecrease in cash flow used in financing activities in 20112013 compared to 20102012 was due primarily to a higher decrease in current borrowings ((3,870) million in 2011 compared to(731) million in 2010), partly offset by a higher issuance of non-current financial debt (4,0698,359 million in 20112013 compared to3,7895,279 million in 2010) and2012), an increase in current financial assets and liabilities (896978 million in 20112013 compared to(817)(947) million in 2010)2012), an increase in other transactions with non-controlling interests (1,621 million in 2013 compared to1 million in 2012), largely offset by a higher decrease in current borrowings ((6,804) million in 2013 compared to(2,754) million in 2012).

88TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Indebtedness

TOTAL’s non-current financial debt at year-end 2013 was25,069 million(1) compared to22,274 million at year-end 2012 and22,557 million at year-end 2011 compared to20,783 million at year-end 2010 and19,437 million at year-end 2009.2011. For further information on the Company’s level of borrowing and the type of financial instruments, including maturity profile of debt and currency and interest rate structure, see Note 20

to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For further information on the Company’s treasury policies, including the use of instruments for hedging purposes and the currencies in which cash and cash equivalents are held, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”.

Cash and cash equivalents at year-end 2013 were14,647 million compared to15,469 million at year-end 2012 and14,025 million at year-end 2011 compared to14,489 million at year-end 2010 and11,662 million at year-end 2009.2011.

Shareholders’ equity

Shareholders’ equity at year-end 2013 was69,38974,910 million at December 31, 2011, compared to61,27172,465 million(2)at year-end 20102012 and53,53968,297 million(2) at year-end 2009.2011. Changes in shareholders’ equity in 2013 were primarily due to the addition of net income and other operations with non-controlling interests, partially offset by translation adjustments and the payment of dividends. Changes in shareholders’ equity in 2012 were primarily due to the addition of net income, partially offset by translation adjustments and the payment of dividends. Changes in shareholders’ equity in 2011 were primarily due to the addition of net income and translation

adjustments, which were only partially offset by the payment of dividends. Changes in shareholders’ equity in 2010 were primarily due toIn 2013, TOTAL bought back 4.4 million of its own shares (i.e. 0.19% of the additionshare capital as of net income and translation adjustments, which were only partially offsetDecember 31, 2013) under the authorization granted by the paymentshareholders at the meeting of dividends. ChangesMay 17, 2013 (see “Item 10. Share buybacks in shareholders’ equity in 2009 were primarily due to2013”). In 2012, TOTAL bought back 1.8 million of its own shares (i.e., 0.08% of the additionshare capital as of net income, which was only partially offsetDecember 31, 2012) under the previous authorization granted by the paymentshareholders at the meeting of dividends and translation adjustments.May 11, 2012. TOTAL did not repurchase any of its own shares during the years 2009, 2010 andyear 2011.

Net-debt-to-equity

As of December 31, 2011,2013, TOTAL’s net-debt-to-equity ratio which is net debt (i.e., the sum of current borrowings, other current financial liabilities and non-current financial debt, net of current financial assets, hedging instruments on non-current financial debt and cash and cash equivalents) divided by the sum of shareholders’ equity and non-controlling interests after expected dividends payable,(3) was 23%, compared to 22% and 27%23% at year-ends 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively. Over the 2009-20112011-2013 period, TOTAL used its net cash flow (cash flow from operating activities less investments plus divestments) (4)to maintain this ratio generally in its targeted range of around 25%20% to 30%, primarily by managing net debt, while net income increased shareholders’ equity and dividends paid throughout the period decreased shareholders’ equity. As of December 31, 2011,2013, TOTAL S.A. had $10,139$11,031 million of long-term confirmed lines of credit, of which $10,096$11,031 million were unused.

In 2012,2014, based on the Group’s capital expenditures budget and after payment of dividends, the Company expects to maintain its net debt-to-equity ratio in the target range of around 20% to 30% in a $100 per barrel market environment. For information on the Group’s capital expenditures budget, please refer to the discussion in “— Overview”., above.

 

GUARANTEES AND OTHER OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

 

As part of certain project financing arrangements, Total S.A. provided in 2008 guarantees in connection with the financing of the Yemen LNG project for an amount of1,208528 million, presented under “Guarantees given against borrowings” in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In turn, certain partners involved in this project have given commitments that could, in the case of Total S.A.’s guarantees being called for the maximum amount, reduce the Group’s exposure by up to404 million, recorded under “Other commitments received” in the same Note. “Guarantees given against borrowings” also include the guarantees provided in 2010 by Total S.A. in connection with the financing of the Jubail project (operated by SAUDI ARAMCO TOTAL Refining and Petrochemical Company (SATORP)) of up to2,4632,311 million, proportional to TOTAL’s share in the project (37.5%). In addition, Total S.A. provided in 2010 a

guarantee in favor of its partner in the Jubail project (Saudi Arabian Oil Company) with respect to Total Refining Saudi Arabia SAS’s obligations under the shareholders agreement with respect to SATORP. As of December 31, 2011,2013, this guarantee is of up to1,095892 million and has been presented under “Other

“Other operating commitments” in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In 2013, TOTAL S.A. provided guarantees in connection with the financing of the Ichthys LNG project for an amount of2,218 million, presented under “Guarantees given against borrowings” in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

These guarantees and other information on the Company’s commitments and contingencies are presented in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Group does not currently consider that these guarantees, or any other off-balance sheet arrangements of TotalTOTAL S.A. nor any other members of the Group, have or are reasonably likely to have, currently or in the future, a material effect on the Group’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operation, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

 

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

(1)

Excludes net current financial debt of(130) million as of December 31,2013 (756 million as of December 31, 2012 and0 million as of as of December 31, 2011), related to assets classified in accordance with IFRS 5 “non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations”.

(2)

Figures for 2012 and 2011 have been restated pursuant to the retrospective application of the revised accounting standard IAS 19 from January 1, 2013.

(3)

Net-debt-to-equity ratio = net debt (i.e., the sum of current borrowings, other current financial liabilities and non-current financial debt, net of current financial assets, net financial assets and liabilities related to assets classified in accordance with IFRS 5 as non-current assets held for sale, hedging instruments on non-current financial debt and cash and cash equivalents) divided by the sum of shareholders’ equity and non-controlling interests after expected dividends payable.

(4)

Net cash flow = cash flow from operating activities less investments plus divestments.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.89


Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

 

 

Payment due by period (M)  Less
than
1 year
   1-3
years
   3-5
years
   More
than
5 years
   Total 

Non-current debt obligations(a)

        8,052     5,069     7,308     20,429  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations(b)

   3,488                    3,488  

Finance lease obligations(c)

   25     70     64     18     177  

Asset retirement obligations(d)

   272     469     335     5,808     6,884  

Operating lease obligations(c)

   762     968     651     940     3,321  

Purchase obligations(e)

   11,049     11,058     9,476     45,770     77,353  

Total

   15,596     20,617     15,595     59,844     111,652  

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Payment due by period (M)  Less
than
1 year
   1-3
years
   3-5
years
   More
than
5 years
   Total 

Non-current debt obligations(a)

        6,572     6,149     11,040     23,761  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations(b)

   3,784                    3,784  

Finance lease obligations(c)

   29     82     28     170     309  

Asset retirement obligations(d)

   533     1,067     650     7,037     9,287  

Operating lease obligations(c)

   807     1,257     820     1,174     4,058  

Purchase obligations(e)

   14,546     14,867     9,796     47,066     86,275  

Total

   19,699     23,845     17,443     66,487     127,474  

 

(a)

Non-current debt obligations are included in the items “Non-current financial debt” and “Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt” of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The figurefigures in this table isare net of the non-current portion of issue swaps and swaps hedging bonds, and excludesexclude non-current finance lease obligations of152 million.280 million and net current financial debt of(130) million related to assets classified in accordance with IFRS 5 “non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations”.

(b)

The current portion of non-current debt is included in the items “Current borrowings”, “Current financial assets” and “Other current financial liabilities” of the balance sheet. The figurefigures in this table isare net of the current portion of issue swaps and swaps hedging bonds and excludesexclude the current portion of finance lease obligations of2529 million.

(c)

Finance lease obligations and operating lease obligations: the Group leases real estate, retail stations, ships, and other equipment through non-cancelable capital and operating leases. These amounts represent the future minimum lease payments on non-cancelable leases to which the Group is committed as of December 31, 2011,2013, less the financial expense due on finance lease obligations for3182 million.

(d)

The discounted present value of Upstream asset retirement obligations, primarily asset removal costs at the completion date.

(e)

Purchase obligations are obligations under contractual agreements to purchase goods or services, including capital projects. These obligations are enforceable and legally binding on TOTAL and specify all significant terms, including the amount and the timing of the payments. These obligations mainly include: hydrocarbon unconditional purchase contracts (except where an active, highly liquid market exists and when the hydrocarbons are expected to be re-sold shortly after purchase), reservation of transport capacities in pipelines, unconditional exploration works and development works in Upstream, and contracts for capital investment projects in Downstream. This disclosure does not include contractual exploration obligations with host states where a monetary value is not attributed and purchases of booking capacities in pipelines where the Group has a participation superior to the capacity used.

For additional information on the Group’s contractual obligations, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Group has other obligations in connection with pension plans which are described in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As these obligations are not contractually fixed as to timing and amount, they have not been included in this disclosure. Other non-currentnon-

current liabilities, detailed in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, are liabilities related to risks that are probable and amounts that can be reasonably estimated. However, no contractual agreements exist related to the settlement of such liabilities, and the timing of the settlement is not known.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

 

 

In 2011,2013, Research & Development (R&D) expenses amounted to949 million, compared with805 million in 2012 and776 million compared to715 million in 2010 and650 million in 2009.2011. The process initiated in 2004 to increase R&D budgets continued in 2011. In addition, the Group set up in 2009 a structure to contribute to the development of start-ups that specialize in innovative energy technologies.2013.

In 2011, 3,946 employees2013, 4,684 people were dedicated to R&D activities, compared with 4,110 in 2012 and 3,946 in 2011. This is mainly due to 4,087changes in 2010 and 4,016 in 2009. The reduction in 2011 can be explained, in particular, by the sale of partscope of the Specialty Chemicals’ Resins activity.Group’s activities.

There are six major R&D focuses at TOTAL:

 

developing knowledge, tools and technological mastery to discover and profitably operate complex oil and gas resources to help meet the global demand for energy;

developing and industrializing solar, biomass and carbon capture and storage technologies to help prepare for future energy needs;

developing practical, innovative and competitive materials and products that meet customers’ specific needs, contribute to the emergence of new features and systems, enable current materials to be replaced by materials showing higher performance for users, and address the challenges of improved energy efficiency, lower environmental impact and toxicity, better management of their life cycle and waste recovery;

developing, industrializing and improving first-level competitive processes for the conversion of oil, coal and biomass resources to adapt to changes in resources and markets, improve reliability and safety, achieve better energy efficiency, reduce the

  

efficiency, reduce the environmental footprint and maintain the Group’s economic margins in the long term;

understanding and measuring the impacts of the Group’s operations and products on ecosystems (water, soil, air, biodiversity) and recovering waste to improve environmental safety, as part of the regulation in conformity with existing regulation,place, and reduce the Group’stheir environmental footprint to achieve sustainability in itsthe Group’s operations; and

mastering and using innovative technologies such as biotechnologies, materials sciences, nanotechnologies, high-performance computing, information and communications technologies and new analytic techniques.

These issues are addressed synergistically within a portfolio of projects. Different aspects may be looked at independently by different divisions.

The portfolio managed by the entity tasked with developing SMEs specialized in innovative energy technologies and cleantechs has grown regularly since 2009.

The Group intends to increase R&D in all of its business unitssectors through cross-functional themes and technologies. Attention is paid to synergies of R&D efforts between business units.

The Group has twenty-twotwenty-one R&D sites worldwide and has developed approximately 600 partnerships with other industrial groups and academic or highly specialized research institutes. TOTAL also has a permanently renewed network of scientific advisors worldwide that monitor and advise on matters of interest

90TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Items 5 - 6

to the Group’s R&D activities. Long-term partnerships with universities and academic laboratories, deemed strategic in Europe, the United States, Japan and China, as well as innovative small businesses are part of the Group’s approach.

Each business unitsegment is actively developing itsan active intellectual property policy in order to protectactivity, aimed at protecting its innovations, to permitallowing its activity to develop without constraints and to faciliteas well as facilitating its partnerships. In 2011,2013, more than 250 new patent applications were issued by the Group.

 

 

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

 

Composition of the Board of Directors

Directors are appointed by the shareholders for a 3-year term (Article 11 of the Company’s by-laws)bylaws).

In case of the resignation or death of a director between two Shareholders’ Meetings, the Board may temporarily appoint a replacement director. This appointment must be ratified by the next Shareholders’ Meeting. The terms of office of the members of the Board are staggered to more evenly space the renewal of appointments.appointments and to ensure the continuity of the work of the Board of Directors and its Committees.

The Board of Directors appoints the Chairman of the Board from among its members. The Board of Directors also appoints the Chief Executive Officer, who may or may not be a member of the Board.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, the Board of Directors had fifteen members, including one director appointed by the shareholders to represent employee shareholders. Twelve of the members of the Board were independent.

independent(see “— Director independence”, below).

The following individuals were members of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. (information as of December 31, 2011(1))2013):

 

 

 

Christophe de Margerie

Born on August 6, 1951 (French).

Mr. de Margerie joined the Group after graduating from theÉcole École Supérieure de Commerce in Paris in 1974. He served in several positions in the Group’s Finance Department and Exploration & Production division. In 1995, he was appointed President of Total Middle East. In May 1999, he joined the Executive Committee as President of the Exploration & Production division. He then became Senior Executive Vice President of Exploration & Production of the new TotalFinaElf group in 2000.

In January 2002, he became President of the Exploration & Production division of TOTAL. He was appointed a member of the Board of Directors by the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 12, 2006 and became Chief

Executive Officer of TOTAL on

February 14, 2007. On May 21, 2010, he was appointednamed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL. Mr. de Margerie is also a Director of the Institut du monde arabe.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2006 —2006. Last renewal: May 15, 200911, 2012 until 2012.2015.

Chairman of the Strategic Committee.

Holds 105,556121,556 TOTAL shares and 53,86965,242 shares of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund.

Principal other directorships

 

Director of Shtokman Development AG (Switzerland)

 

MemberDirector of the Supervisory Board ofVivendiBNP Paribas* since May 15, 2013

 

Manager ofCDM Patrimonial SARL

 

 

 

 

Thierry Desmarest

Born on December 18, 1945 (French).

A graduate of theÉcole École Polytechnique and an Engineer of the FrenchCorps des Mines,, Mr. Desmarest served as Director of Mines and Geology in New Caledonia, then as technical advisor at the Offices of the Minister of Industry and the Minister of Economy. He joined TOTAL in 1981, where he held various management positions, then served as President of Exploration & Production until 1995. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL from May 1995 until February 2007, and then as Chairman of the Board of TOTAL until May 21, 2010. He was appointed Honorary Chairman and remains a director of TOTAL and Chairman of the TOTAL Foundation.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 1995 —1995. Last renewal: May 21, 201017, 2013 until 2013.2016.

Chairman of the NominatingGovernance & GovernanceEthics Committee, member of the Compensation Committee and the Strategic Committee.

Holds 186,576 shares in full and 144,000 shares by usufruct.shares.

Principal other directorships

 

 

Director ofSanofi* Sanofi*(2)(1)

 

Director ofAirL’Air Liquide*

 

Director ofRenault S.A.*

 

Director ofRenault S.A.S.

 

Director ofBombardier Inc. (Canada)*

 

 

 

 

 

(1)As of May 13, 2011, the directorships of Bertrand Jacquillat and Lord Levene of Portsoken expired.
(2)

Non-consolidated company which was removed from the Company’s scope of consolidation on July 1, 2010.

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
UnderlinedUnderlined companies are companies excluded fromthat do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.91


Item 6 - Directors and Senior Management

Patrick Artus

Born on October 14, 1951 (French).

Independent director.

A graduate fromof theÉcole École Polytechnique,, theÉcole École Nationale de la Statistique et de l’Administration de l’ÉconomieÉconomique (ENSAE) and theInstitut d’Éétudes Politiquespolitiques de Paris, Mr. Artus began his career at the INSEE (French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies) where his work included economic forecasting and modeling. He then worked at the Economics Department of the OECD (1980), later becoming the Head of Research at the ENSAE from 1982 to 1985. He was scientific adviser

at the research department of the Banque de France, before joining the Natixis Group as the head of the research department.department, and has been a

member of its Executive Committee since May 2013. He is an associate professor at the University of Paris I, Sorbonne. He is also a member of the council of economic advisors to the French Prime Minister and of theCercletheCercle des Economistes.Économistes.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2009. Last renewal: May 15, 2009 and11, 2012 until 2012.2015.

Member of the Compensation Committee and the Governance & Ethics Committee.

Holds 1,000 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

 

Director ofIPSOS*

 

 

 

 

Patricia Barbizet

Born on April 17, 1955 (French).

Independent director.

A graduate of theÉcole École Supérieure de Commerce of Paris in 1976, Ms. Barbizet started her career in the Renault Group as the Treasurer of Renault Véhicules Industriels and then Chief Financial Officer of Renault Crédit International. She joined the Pinault group in 1989 as the Chief Financial Officer. In 1992, she became theChief Executive Officer of Artémis, then in 2004 Chief Executive Officer of Financière Pinault. She was the President of the Supervisory Board of the Pinault Printemps Redoute group until May 2005 and became Vice-President of the Board of Directors of PPR (now Kering) in May 2005. Patricia Barbizet is also a member of the Board of Directors of TOTAL TF1, Air France-KLM andFonds stratégique d’investissement. Peugeot S.A.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2008 —2008. Last renewal: May 13, 2011 and until 2014.

Chairperson of the Audit Committee and member of the Strategic Committee.

Holds 1,000 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

Director ofPeugeot S.A.* since April 24, 2013

Director and Vice Chairman of PPR*the Board of Directors of Kering S.A.*

Director and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Artémis (S.A.)

Chief Executive Officer (non-Director) of Financière Pinault (S.C.A.)

Member of the Supervisory Board of Financière Pinault (S.C.A.)

Director and Deputy Chief Executive Officerof Groupe Fnac * (S.A.) since April 17, 2013

Director of Société Nouvelle du Théâtre Marigny (S.A)

Permanent representative of Artémis, atmember of the Board of Directors of Agefi (S.A.)

Permanent representative of Artémis, atmember of the Board of Directors of Sebdo le Point (S.A.)

Member of the Management Board of Société Civile du Vignoble de Château Latour (SCI)(société civile)

Chief Member of the Supervisory Board of Yves Saint Laurent (S.A.S.)

 

Administratore Delagatoand & administratore of Palazzo Grazzi

Non-executive Director of Tawa Plc*

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Christie’s International Plc

Board member of Gucci Group N.V.

Director ofAir France-KLM* (Italy)

 

DirectorChairman ofBouygues* the Board of Directors & Board memberof Christie’s International Plc (England)

 

Non-Executive DirectorofTF1*

DirectorFonds stratégique d’investissement (French government sovereign fund) Kering Holland, formerly Gucci (Netherlands), since April 9, 2013

 

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
Underlinedcompanies are companies excluded from the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

Daniel Bouton

Born on April 10, 1950 (French).

Independent director.

Inspector General of Finance, Mr. Bouton has held various positions within the French Ministry of Economy. He served as Budget Director at the Ministry of Finance from 1988 to 1990. He joined Société Générale in 1991, where he was appointed Chief Executive Officer in 1993, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in November 1997. He served

as Chairman of the Société Générale group until May 12, 2008 and has been the Honorary Chairman since May 6, 2009.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 1997 — Last renewal: May 15, 2009 until 2012.

Holds 3,200 shares.

Principal other directorships

Director ofVeolia Environnement*

 

 

 

Gunnar Brock

Born on April 12, 1950 (Swedish).

Independent director.

Graduated fromA graduate of the Stockholm School of Economics with an MBA grade in Economics and Business Administration, Mr. Brock held various international positions at Tetra Pak. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Alfa Laval from 1992 to 1994 and as Chief Executive Officer of Tetra Pak from 1994 to 2000. After serving as Chief Executive Officer of Thule International, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Atlas Copco AB from 2002 to 2009. He is currently Chairman of the Board of Stora Enso Oy. Mr. Brock is also a member of the Royal Swedish

Academy of Engineering Sciences and of the Board of Directors of the Stockholm School of Economics.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2010. Last renewal: May 21, 2010 and17, 2013 until 2013.2016.

Member of the Compensation Committee, the Governance & Ethics Committee and the Strategic Committee.

Holds 1,000 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

Chairman of the Board of Stora Enso OyOy*

 

Member of the Board ofInvestor AB*

Member of the Board ofSyngenta AG*

Chairman of the Board ofMölnlycke Health Care Group

 

Member of the Board ofInvestor AB

Chairman of the Board ofRolling Optics

 

Member of theBoard ofStena AB*

 

 

 

 

Claude Clément

Born on November 17, 1956 (French).

Mr. Clément joined the Group in February 1977 and started his career at Compagnie Française de Raffinage, which offered him professional training. He held various positions at the Refining Manufacturing Department in French and African refineries (Gabon, Cameroon). He is currently Manager of the Refining Manufacturing Methods at the Refining Manufacturing Division. Mr. Clément has been an elected member of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment

fund since 2009, an elected member of the Supervisor Board of the “TOTAL ACTIONS EUROPÉENNES”, “TOTAL DIVERSIFIE A DOMINANTE ACTIONS” and “TOTAL ÉPARGNE SOLIDAIRE” collective investment funds since 2010 and an elected member of the Supervisor Board of the “TOTAL DIVERSIFIÉ A DOMINANTE OBLIGATIONS”, “TOTAL MONETAIRE” and “TOTAL OBLIGATIONS” collective investment funds since 2010.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 21, 2010 and until 2013.

Holds 820 TOTAL shares and 3,442 shares of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund.

 

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
UnderlinedUnderlined companies are companies excluded fromthat do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

92TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Directors and Senior Management

Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette

Born on November 4, 1956 (French).

Independent director.

A graduate of the University of Paris X Nanterre (law and English) and admitted toholder of aSpecialized Law Certificate from the Paris and New York Bar Associations in 1980,Association, Ms. Coisne-Roquette worked as an attorney in Paris and New York until 1988, when she joined the family-owned Sonepar group. From 1988 to 1998, while also serving as Chief Executive Officer of the family-owned Colam Entreprendre holding company, she held several consecutive operational directorships at Sonepar S.A., where she was appointed Chairman of the Board in 1998. She has served aswas Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sonepar from 2002 to 2012, and has been Chairman of the Board of Directors since 2002.January 1, 2013. A member of the Executive Board of MEDEF sincefrom 2000 Ms. Coisne-Roquette hasto 2013, where she chaired that organization’s Tax Commission since 2005.from 2005 to 2013, Ms. Coisne-Roquette is a member of the Economic, Social and Environmental Council. She is also a director of the Association nationale des sociétés par actions (ANSA).

Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 13, 2011 and until 2014.

Member of the Audit Committee since May 13, 2011.Committee.

Holds 1,1301,260 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of Sonepar S.A.

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Colam Entreprendre

Director of Hagemeyer Canada, Inc.

President of the Supervisory Board of OTRA N.V.

Director of Sonepar Canada, Inc.

President of the Supervisory Board of Sonepar Deutschland GmbH

Director of de Sonepar Ibérica

Director of de Sonepar Italia Holding

Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar MexicoS.A.

MemberChairperson and Chief Executive Officer of the Supervisory Board of Sonepar Nederland B.V.Colam Entreprendre

Director of Sonepar USA Holdings, Inc.

Director of Feljas and Masson SAS

Permanent representative of Colam Entreprendre, member of the Board of Directors at Cabus & Raulot (S.A.S.)(S.A.S)

Permanent representative of Colam Entreprendre and Sonepar, co-administrators of Sonedis (société civile)

Permanent representative of Sonepar, DirectorColam Entreprendre, co-manager of Sonepar FranceSonedis (société civile)

Permanent representative of Sonepar, President of Sonepar International (S.A.S.)

Permanent representative of Colam Entreprendre, Director of Sovemarco Europe (S.A.)

Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of Sonepar France

 

Co-manager ofDéveloppement Mobilier & Industriel(D.M.I.) (socié(sociécivile)civile)

 

Manager ofKer Coro (socié(société civile immobilière)re)

 

 

 

 

Bertrand Collomb

Born on August 14, 1942 (French).

Independent director.

A graduate of theÉcole École Polytechnique and a member of France’s engineeringCorps des Mines,, Mr. Collomb held a number of positions within the Ministry of Industry and other cabinet positions from 1966 to 1975. He joined the Lafarge group in 1975, where he served in various management positions. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lafarge from 1989 to 2003, then as Chairman of the Lafarge Board of Directors from 2003 to 2007, and has been the Honorary Chairman since 2007.

He is also Chairman of theInstitut des Hautes Études pour la Science et la Technologie (IHEST) and a Board member of theInstitut Européen de la Technologie.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2000 —2000. Last renewal: May 15, 200911, 2012 until 2012.2015.

Member of the Compensation Committee and the NominatingGovernance & GovernanceEthics Committee.

Holds 4,7124,932 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

Director of Lafarge*

 

Director ofDuPont* (United States)States of America)

 

Director ofAtco* (Canada)

 

 

 

 

 

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
UnderlinedUnderlined companies are companies excluded fromthat do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.93


Item 6 - Directors and Senior Management

Paul Desmarais, Jr.(1)jr(1)

Born on July 3, 1954 (Canadian).

Independent director.

A graduate of McGill University in Montreal and INSEADof the Institut européen d’administration des affaires (INSEAD) in Fontainebleau, Mr. Desmarais was elected Vice Chairman (1984) and then Chairman of the Board (1990) of Corporation

Financière Power, a company he helped to found. Since 1996, he has served as Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Power Corporation of Canada.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2002 —2002. Last renewal: May 13, 2011 until 2014.

Holds 2,000 ADRs (corresponding to 2,000 shares).

Principal other directorships

 

Chairman of the Board Co-Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Executive Committee of Power Corporation of Canada*

Co-Chairman of the Board and member of the Executive Committee of Corporation Financière Power* (Canada)

Vice Chairman and Acting Managing Director of Pargesa Holding S.A.*SA* (Switzerland)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of La Great-West, Compagniecompagnie d’assurance-vie (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of First Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company (United States)States of America)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of Great-West Lifeco Inc.* (Canada)

Director of Great WestGreat-West Financial (Canada) Inc. (Canada)

Vice Chairman, Director and member of the Permanent Committee of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert S.A.*SA* (Belgium)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of Groupe Investors Inc. (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of Groupe d’assurance London Inc. (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of London Life, compagnie d’assurance-vie (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of Mackenzie Inc.

Director and Deputy Chairman of the Board of La Presse, Ltéltée (Canada)

Director and Deputy Chairman of Gesca Ltéltée (Canada)

 

Director ofGDF Suez*

Director ofLafarge* (S.A.) (France)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of Compagnie d’Assurance du Canada sur la Vie (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of the Corporation Financière Canada LifeCanada-Vie (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of IGM Inc.* (Canada)

Director and Chairman of the Board of 171263 Canada Inc. (Canada)

Director of 152245 Canada Inc. (Canada)

Director of GWL&A Financial Inc. (United States)States of America)

Director of Great WestGreat-West Financial (Nova Scotia) Co. (Canada)

Director of First Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York (United States)States of America)

Director of Power Communications Inc. (Canada)

Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of Power Corporation International (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of Putnam Investments LLC (United States of America)

Member of the Supervisory Board of Power Financial Europe B.V. (Netherlands)

Director of Canada Life Capital Corporation Inc. (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of The Canada Life AssuranceInsurance Company of Canada (Canada)

Director and member of the Executive Committee of Crown Life Insurance Company (Canada)

Director and Deputy Chairman of the Board of Groupe de Communications Square Victoria Communications Group Inc. (Canada)

Member of the Supervisory Board of Parjointco N.V. (Netherlands)

Director of SGS SA* (Switzerland)

 

 

 

 

Anne-Marie Idrac

Born on July 27, 1951 (French).

Independent director.

A graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris and formerly a student at the École Nationale d’Administration (ENA – 1974), Ms. Idrac began her career holding various positions as a senior civil servant at the Ministry of Infrastructure (Ministère de l’Équipement) in the fields of environment, housing, urban planning and transportation. She served as Executive Director of the public development authority of Cergy-Pontoise from 1990 to 1993 and Director of land transport from 1993 to 1995. Ms. Idrac was State Secretary for Transport from May 1995 to June 1997, elected member of Parliament for Yvelines from 1997 to 2002, regional

councilor for Ile-de-France from 1998 to 2002, and State Secretary for Foreign Trade from March 2008 to November 2010. She also served as Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of RATP from 2002 to 2006 and then as Chairperson of SNCF from 2006 to 2008.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 11, 2012 and until 2015.

Holds 1,195 shares.

Principal other directorships

Director ofBouygues*

Director ofSaint Gobain*

Member of the Supervisory Board ofVallourec*

Director ofMediobanca S.p.A.* (Italy)

 

 

(1)

Mr. Desmarais, Jr.jr is a director of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, which acting in concert with Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille, to the Company’s knowledge, owns 5.5%4.8% of the Company’s shares and 5.5%4.8% of the voting rights. Mr. Demarais, Jr.jr disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
UnderlinedUnderlined companies are companies excluded fromthat do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

94TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Directors and Senior Management

Charles Keller

Born on November 15, 1980 (French).

Director representing employee shareholders.

A graduate of the École Polytechnique and the École des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC), Charles Keller joined the Group in 2005 at the refinery in Normandy as a performance auditor. In 2008, he was named Project Manager at the Grandpuits refinery to improve the site’s energy efficiency and oversee its reliability plan. In 2010, he joined Exploration & Production and Yemen LNG as areliability engineer and then became head of the Production

Support department in charge of optimizing the plant. Charles Keller has been an elected member, representing holders of fund units, of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund since November 2012. He is also an elected member of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL DIVERSIFIÉ A DOMINANTE ACTIONS”, “TOTAL ACTIONS EUROPÉENNES” and “TOTAL EPARGNE SOLIDAIRE” collective investment funds.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 17, 2013 and until 2016.

Holds 430 TOTAL shares and 54 shares of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund.

Barbara Kux

Born on February 26, 1954 (Swiss).

Independent director.

Holder of an MBA (with honors) from INSEAD in Fontainebleau, Ms. Kux joined McKinsey & Company in 1984 as a Management Consultant, where she was responsible for strategic assignments for international groups. After serving as manager for development of emerging markets at ABB and then at Nestlé between 1989 and 1999, she was appointed Executive Director of Ford in Europe from 1999 to 2003. In 2003, Ms. Kux became a member of the Management Committee of the

Philips group and, starting in 2005, was in charge of sustainable development. SinceFrom 2008 to 2013, she has beenwas a member of the Management Board of Siemens AG.

She is alsohas been responsible for sustainable development at the Group and is in charge of the Group’s supply chain. Since 2013, she has been a member of the Supervisory Board of Henkel and a member of the Board of Directors of Firmenich S.A.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 13, 2011 and until 2014.

Member of the Strategic Committee.

Holds 1,000 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

Member of the Management Board of Siemens AG*

Member of the Supervisory Board ofHenkel* since 2013

Member of the Board of Directors ofFirmenich S.A. since 2013

Director ofUmicore* as of January 1, 2014

 

 

 

 

Gérard Lamarche(1)

Born July 15, 1961 (Belgian).

Independent director.

Mr. Lamarche graduated in economic science from Louvain-la-Neuve University and the INSEAD business school (Advanced Management Program for Suez Group Executives). He also followed the Global Leadership Series course of training at the Wharton International Forum in 1998-99. He started his career in 1983 at Deloitte Haskins & Sells in Belgium, before becoming a consultant in mergers and acquisitions in Holland in 1987. In 1988, Mr. Lamarche joined Société Générale de Belgique as an investment manager and management controller between 1989 and 1991, then as a consultant in strategic operations from 1992 to 1995. He joined Compagnie Financière de Suez as a project manager for the Chairman and Secretary of the Executive Committee (1995-1997), before taking part in the merger between Compagnie de Suez and Lyonnaise des Eaux, which became Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux (1997), and then being appointed as the acting Managing Director in charge of Planning, Management Control and Accounts. In 2000, Mr. Lamarche pursued his career in industry by joining NALCO (the American subsidiary of the Suez

group and the world leader in the treatment of industrial water) as the Director and Chief Executive Officer. In March 2004, he was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Suez group. In April 2011, Mr. Lamarche became a director on the Board of Directors of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert (GBL). He has been the acting Managing Director since January 2012. Mr. Lamarche is currently a director of Lafarge, Legrand, TOTAL S.A. and SGS SA. He is also a non-voting member (censeur) on the Board of Directors of GDF Suez.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2012. Last renewal: May 17, 2013 until 2016.

Member of the Audit Committee and the Strategic Committee.

Holds 2,775 shares.

Principal other directorships

Acting Managing Director and Director of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert*

Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee ofLegrand*

Director ofLafarge*

Director ofSGS SA* (Switzerland)

Non-voting member (censeur) ofGDF Suez*

(1)

Mr. Lamarche is the Acting Managing Director and a Director of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, which acting in concert with Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille, to the Company’s knowledge, owns 4.8% of the Company’s shares and 4.8% of the voting rights. Mr. Lamarche disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.95


Item 6 - Directors and Senior Management

Anne Lauvergeon

Born on August 2, 1959 (French).

Independent director.

Chief Mining Engineer and a graduate of theÉcole École Normale Supérieure with a doctorate in physical sciences, Ms. Lauvergeon held various positions in industry before becoming Deputy Chief of Staff in the Office of the President of the Republic in 1990. She joined Lazard Frères et Cie as Managing Partner in 1995. From 1997 to 1999, she was Executive Vice President and member of the Executive Committee of Alcatel, in charge of industrial partnerships and international affairs. Ms. Lauvergeon

served as ChairmanChairperson of the Management Board of Areva from July 2001 to June 2011 and Chairmanas Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of

Areva NC (formerly Cogema) from June 1999 to June 2011. She has been Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of ALP S.A. since 2011.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2000 —2000. Last renewal: May 15, 200911, 2012 until 2012.2015.

Member of the Strategic Committee.

Holds 2,000 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of ALP S.A.

 

Director ofGDF SuezVodafone Group Plc*

 

Director ofVodafoneAirbus Group PlcNV* (formerly EADS)

Director ofAmerican Express*

Chairperson of the Supervisory Board ofLibération

 

 

 

 

Claude Mandil

Born on January 9, 1942 (French).

Independent director.

A graduate of theÉcole École Polytechnique and a General Engineer from France’s engineering school CorpsCorps des Mines,, Mr. Mandil served as a Mining Engineer in the Lorraine and Bretagne regions. He then served as a Project Manager at theDélégation de l’Aménagement du Territoire et de l’Action Régionale (City and Department planning/planning — DATAR) and as the Interdepartmental Head of Industry and Research and regional delegate of ANVAR.the Agence nationale de valorisation de la recherche (State technology transfer agency — ANVAR). From 1981 to 1982, he served as the technical advisor on the staff of the Prime Minister, in charge of the industry, energy and research sectors. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theInstitut de Développement Industriel (Industry Development Institute — IDI) until 1988. He was Chief Executive Officer of theBureau de Recherches

Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM) from 1988 to 1990. From 1990 to 1998, Mr. Mandil wasserved as Chief Executive Officer for Energy and Commodities at the French Industry Ministry and thebecame France’s first representative for France to the Management Board of the International Energy Agency (IEA). He served as Chairman of the IEA from 1997 to 1998. In 1998, he was appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Gaz de France and, in April 2000, Chairman of theInstitut Français du Pétrole(French (French Institute for Oil). From 2003 to 2007, he was the Executive Director of the EIA.IEA. Mr. Mandil is also director of the Institut Veolia Environnement and of Schlumberger SBC Energy Institute.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2008 —2008. Last renewal: May 13, 2011 and until 2014.

Member of the Strategic Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance & Ethics Committee.

Holds 1,000 shares.

Principal other directorships

Director ofInstitut Veolia Environnement

Director ofSchlumberger SBC Institute

 

 

 

 

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
Underlinedcompanies are companies excluded from the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

Michel Pébereau(1)(1)

Born on January 23, 1942 (French).

Independent director.

Honorary Inspector General of Finance, Mr. Pébereau held various positions in the Ministry of Economy and Finance, before serving, from 1982 to 1993, as Chief Executive Officer and then as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Crédit Commercial de France (CCF). He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BNP then BNP Paribas from 1993 to 2003, Chairman of the Board of Directors from 2003 to December 1, 2011, and is currently Honorary Chairman of BNP Paribas.

Paribas and Chairman of the BNP Paribas foundation. He is also a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques, member of the Executive Board of the Mouvement des entreprises de France, member of the Policy Board of the Institut de l’Entreprise, Honorary Chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Institut Aspen, Chairman of the

Governing Board of the Institut d’études politiques de Paris, and director of the ARC foundation.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2000 — Last renewal: May 15, 200911, 2012 until 2012.2015.

Chairman of the Compensation Committee and, until February 9, 2012, member of the Nominating & Governance Committee.

Holds 2,356 shares.

Principal other directorships

 

Director of BNP Paribas*

 

Director ofSaint-GobainAirbus Group NV* (formerly EADS)

 

Director ofAXA*

Director ofEADS N.V.*

Director ofPargesa Holding S.A.* (Switzerland)

Director of BNP Paribas SuisseSA (Switzerland)

Member of the Supervisory Board of Banque marocaineMarocaine pour le Commerce et l’Industrie*

 

Non-voting member (Censeurcenseur) ofGaleries Lafayette

 

 

 

 

Thierry de Rudder(2)

Born on September 3, 1949 (Belgian and French).

Independent director.

A graduate of theUniversité de Genève in mathematics, theUniversité Libre de Bruxelles and Wharton (MBA), Mr. de Rudder served in various positions at Citibank from 1975 to 1986 before joining Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, where he was appointed Acting Managing Director.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 1999 — Last renewal: May 21, 2010 until 2013.

Member of the Audit Committee and the Strategic Committee.

Holds 3,956 shares.

Principal other directorships

Acting Managing Director of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert*

Director of Brussels Securities (Belgium)

Director of GBL Treasury Center (Belgium)

Director of Sagerpar (Belgium)

Director of GBL Energy Sàrl (Luxembourg)

Director of GBL Verwaltung Sàrl (Luxembourg)

Director of GBL Verwaltung GmbH (Germany)

Director of Ergon Capital Partners (Belgium)

Director of Ergon Capital Partners II (Belgium)

Director of Ergon Capital Partners III (Belgium)

Director ofGDF Suez*

Director ofLafarge*

Director ofElectrabel

At the meeting held on January 12, 2012, the Board of Directors took note of the resignation of Mr. Thierry de Rudder from his position as a director as of the end of the Board meeting, and consequently decided to co-opt Mr. Gérard Lamarche to replace Mr. de Rudder for the

remaining term of his predecessor’s directorship until the Shareholders’ Meeting to be held in 2013 to approve the 2012 accounts. The nomination of Mr. Lamarche is subject to the ratification of the Shareholders’ general meeting on May 11, 2012.

 

 

(1)

Mr. Pébereau is Honorary Chairman of BNP Paribas, which, to the Company’s knowledge, owns 0.2% of the Company’s shares and 0.2% of the voting rights. Mr. Pébereau is also a director of Pargesa Holding SA, part of Group Bruxelles Lambert, which acting in concert with Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille, to the Company’s knowledge, owns 5.5%4.8% of the Company’s shares and 5.5%4.8% of the voting rights. Mr. Pébereau disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.

(2)Mr. de Rudder was Acting Managing Director of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert which, acting in concert with Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille and to the Company’s knowledge, owns 5.5% of the Company’s shares and 5.5% of the voting rights. Mr. de Rudder disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. Since January 2012, Mr. Gérard Lamarche is Acting Managing Director of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert.
*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
UnderlinedUnderlined companies are companies excluded fromthat do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

96TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013

Gérard Lamarche


Item 6 - Directors and Senior Management

Born July 15, 1961 (Belgian).

Changes in the composition of the Board of Directors in 2013

Independent director.

Mr.At the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2013, the directorships of Messrs. Desmarest, Brock and Lamarche graduated in economic science from Louvain-La-Neuve university and the INSEAD business school (Advanced Management Programwere renewed for Suez Group Executives). He also followed the Global Leadership Series course of traininga 3-year term expiring at the Wharton International Forum in 1998-99. He started his career in 1983 with Deloitte Haskins & Sells in Belgium, before becoming a consultant in mergers and acquisitions in Holland in 1987. In 1988, Mr. Lamarche joined Société Générale de Belgique as an investment manager and management controller between 1989 and 1991, then as a consultant in strategic operations from 1992 to 1995. He joined Compagnie Financière de Suez as a project manager for the Chairman and Secretaryend of the Executive Committee (1995-1997), before taking partShareholders’ Meeting held in 2016 to approve the merger between Compagnie de Suez and Lyonnaise des Eaux, which became Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux (1997), and then being appointed as the acting Managing Director in charge of Planning, Management Control and Accounts. In 2000,2015 financial statements. Mr. Lamarche pursued his career in industry by joining

NALCO (the American subsidiary of the Suez group and the world leader in the treatment of industrial water) as the Director and Chief Executive Officer. In March 2004, heKeller was appointed Chief Executive Officer in chargedirector representing employee shareholders, also for a 3-year term, replacing Mr. Clément, whose term was due to expire.

As of Finance of the Suez group, before being appointed Senior Executive and Vice President in charge of Finance and member of the Management Committee and the Executive Committee of the GDF Suez group in July 2008. On April 12, 2011, Mr. Lamarche became a Director onFebruary 11, 2014, the Board of Directors of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert (GBL). He has beenhad fifteen members, including one director appointed by the acting Managing Director since January 2012. Mr. Lamarche is also a Director of Legrand.

Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2012 — Nomination by cooptation: January 12, 2012 until 2013.

Membershareholders to represent employee shareholders. Twelve of the Audit CommitteeBoard members, which represents 85%(1) of the directors, are independent(see “— Director independence”, below). The number of independent members of the Board of Directors is therefore higher than the number recommended by the AFEP-MEDEF Corporate Governance Code, to which the Company refers and which specifies that at least one half of the Strategic Committee.

Holds 1,575 shares.

Principal other directorshipsmembers of the Board at widely held companies with no controlling shareholders must be independent.

 

Acting Managing Director and Director of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert*

 

Director and memberBoard of the Audit Committee ofLegrand*Directors diversity policy

The Board of Directors places a great deal of importance on its composition and that of its Committees. In particular, it relies on the work of the Governance & Ethics Committee, which reviews annually and proposes, as circumstances may require, desirable changes in the composition of the Board of Directors and Committees based on the Group’s strategy.

The Governance & Ethics Committee conducts its work within the context of a formal procedure so as to ensure the complementarity of the Directors’ competencies and the diversity of their profiles, maintain a rate of independence for the Board as a whole that is relevant to the Company’s governance structure and the structure of its shareholder base, strive for a balanced representation of men and women on the Board, and promote an appropriate representation of directors of different nationalities.

As part of an effort that began several years ago, the composition of the Board of Directors has changed significantly since 2010 to achieve a more balanced representation of men and women and an openness to more international profiles.

As of February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors had four members of foreign nationality (27% of the directors) and five women (one-third of the directors,Other informationi.e., a higher proportion of women than recommended in the AFEP-MEDEF Code).

According to the recommendations introduced in April 2010 in the AFEP-MEDEF Code regarding balanced representation of men and women on boards, the proportion of women on boards of directors was supposed to be at least 20% within three years of the 2010 Shareholders’ Meeting and should be at least 40% within six years of that same Shareholders’ Meeting. These requirements were also stipulated in the French law of January 27, 2011 regarding balanced representation of men and women on Boards of Directors and Supervisory Boards and equal opportunity. Pursuant to this law, the 20% target must be reached by the end of the 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting and the 40% target must be reached by the end of the 2017 Shareholders’ Meeting.

The Board of Directors will continue its reflections on diversifying its composition in the years to come, with the aim of having

women represent more than 40% of the members of the Board of Directors as set out in the law and in the AFEP-MEDEF Code and maintaining an international representation.

Renewals of directorships proposed at the 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting

At its meeting held on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors decided to propose at the May 16, 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting the renewal of the directorships of Mmes. Barbizet, Coisne-Roquette and Kux and Mr. Desmarais, jr. for a 3-year term that will expire at the end of the Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial statements for the 2016 financial year.

If the proposed resolutions are approved, the Board of Directors would have fourteen members at the end of the May 16, 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting (compared with fifteen previously), as Mr. Mandil has not requested the renewal of his directorship, which is due to expire.

Absence of conflicts of interest

The Board also noted the absence of potential conflicts between the Directors’ duties in the best interests of the Company and the private interests of its directors. To the Company’s knowledge, the members of the Board of TOTAL S.A. are not related by close family ties;ties, there are no arrangements or agreements with clients or suppliers that facilitated their appointment;appointment, and there is no service agreement binding a director of TOTAL S.A. to one of its subsidiarysubsidiaries and providing for special benefits upon termination of such agreement.

Absence of a conviction

The current members of the Board of Directors of the Company have informed the Company that they have not been convicted, have not been associated with a bankruptcy, receivership or liquidation, and have not been incriminated or publicly sanctioned or disqualified, as stipulated in item 14.1 of Annex I of EC Regulation 809/2004 of April 29, 2004.

Other information

At its meeting held on February 9, 2012,September 15, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to propose the renewalappointed Mr. Paris de Bollardière Secretary of the directorships of Ms. Lauvergeon and Messrs. de Margerie, Artus, Collomb, and Pébereau, which are due to expire. At

the general Shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2012, the Board will also propose the nomination of a new independent director, Ms. Anne-Marie Idrac, who will place her expertise of the world of industry at the Board’s disposal and will broaden the representativeness and the diversity of the Board. If the resolution is approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting, the proportion of women sitting in the Board will be one-third.

RepresentativeRepresentatives of the Worker’s Council: pursuant to Article L. 2323- 622323-62 of the French Labor Code, members of the Worker’s Council attend, with consultative rights, all meetings of the Board. In compliance with the second paragraph of such article, since July 7, 2010 four members of the Worker’s Council attend Board meetings.

At its meeting on September 15, 2009, the Boardmeetings as of Directors appointed Mr. Charles Paris de Bollardière Secretary of the Board.February 11, 2014.

Director independence

At its meeting on February 9, 2012,11, 2014, the Board of Directors, on the recommendation of the NominatingGovernance & GovernanceEthics Committee, reviewed the independence of the Company’s

*Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly listed companies.
Underlinedcompanies are companies excluded from the group in which the director has his or her main duties.

directors as of December 31, 2011.2013. At the Committee’s suggestion, the Board considered that, pursuant to the AFEP-MEDEF Code, a director is independent when “he or she has no relationship of any kind with the Company, its Group or its Management, that may compromise the exercise of his or her freedom of judgment”.

(1)

Not including the director representing employee shareholders, according to the recommendations made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.97


Item 6 - Directors and Senior Management

For each director, this assessment relies on the independence criteria set forth in the AFEP-MEDEF Code, revised in June 2013, as reminded hereafter:outlined below:

 

not to be an employee or aexecutive director of the Company, or an employee or director of its parent company or of a Groupcompany consolidated by its parent company, and not having been in such a position for the previous five years;

not to be aan executive director of a company in which the Company holds, directly or indirectly, a directorship or in which an employee appointeddesignated as such or an executive director of the companyCompany (currently in office or having held such office for less than five years) is a director;

not to be a material customer, supplier, investment banker or commercial banker of the Company or Group, and for which the Company or the Group is notrepresents a material part of their business;business (the assessment of the materiality or non-materiality of the relationship must be discussed by the Board and the criteria on which this assessment was based must be explained in theannual report);

not to be related by close family ties to a corporate executive officer;director;

not to have been ana statutory auditor of the Company within the previous five years;

not to have been a director of the Company for more than twelve years (upon expiry of the term of office during which the 12-year limit iswas reached).

The AFEP-MEDEF Code expressly stipulates that the Board can decide that the implementation of certain defined criteria is not relevant or induces an interpretation that is particular to the Company.

At its meeting on February 11, 2014, pursuant to the report of the Governance & Ethics Committee, the Board of Directors observed that Mr. Desmarest, Chairman of the Board of Directors until May 21, 2010, had been an executive director within the meaning of the Code within the five previous years.

With regard to the criterion applyingapplicable to twelve years of service, the AFEP-MEDEF code states that “the status of independent director due to the application of this criterion shall only be relinquishedBoard, at the end of the directorship during which the 12-year period is exceeded”. Pursuantits meeting on February 11, 2014, pursuant to the report of the NominatingGovernance & GovernanceEthics Committee, on February 9, 2012, the Board observed that Mr. Bouton and Mr. de Rudderfour directors had exceeded twelve years of service on December 31, 2011. Since2013: Ms. Lauvergeon and Messrs. Collomb, Desmarest and Pébereau. It also observed that Mr. Desmarais, jr.’s years of service as director will reach twelve prior to the directorshipsdate of Messrs. Bouton and de Rudder had been renewed before the twelve-year period expired,May 16, 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting.

In assessing the independence of these directors, the Board decideddisregarded this criterion applicable to twelve years of service based on the opinion that they can still be considered as independentit had no relevance given, on the one hand, the specific characteristics of the oil and gas sector which relies on long-term investment cycles, and, on the other hand, the objectivity that these directors accordinghave demonstrated in the Board’s activity. In addition, it deemed that the experience acquired on the Board by these directors strengthened their freedom of speech and their independence of judgment and, therefore, benefited the Group. The Board also noted that the criterion related to the AFEP-MEDEF code.length of term of office was not one of the independence criteria required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

Accordingly, the Board held that Mr. Collomb, Mr. Desmarais, Jr., Ms. Lauvergeon and Mr. Pébereau could be deemed as being independent.

Concerning “material” relationships, as a client,customer, supplier, investment banker or finance banker, between a director and the

Company, the Board deemed that the level of activity between Group companies and thea bank at which one of its DirectorsMr. Pébereau is an officer,a former corporate executive director, which is less than 0.1% of its net banking income(1)and less than 5% of the Group’s overall assets, represents neither a material portion of the overall activity of such bank nor a material portion of the Group’s external financing. The Board concluded that Mr. Pébereau shouldcould be considereddeemed as being independent.

Similarly,Likewise, the Board of Directors also deemed that the level of activity between Group companies and one of its suppliers, Stena AB,Vallourec, of which Mr. BrockMs. Idrac is a director,member of the Supervisory Board, which is less than 2.68%3.3% of Stena AB’sVallourec’s turnover(2)and less than 0.5% of the Group’s purchasing in 2013, represents neither a material portion of the supplier’s overall activity nor a material portion of the Group’s purchasing. The Board concluded that Ms. Idrac could be deemed as being independent.

Furthermore, the Board deemed that the level of activity between Group companies and Stena AB of which Mr. Brock is a director, was nil in 2013. The Board concluded that Mr. Brock could be considereddeemed as an independent director.being independent.

Mmes. Barbizet, Coisne-Roquette, Idrac, Kux and Lauvergeon, and Messrs. Artus, Bouton, Brock, Collomb, Desmarais, Lamarche, Mandil and Pébereau and de Rudder were deemed to be independent directors.

80%85%(3) of the directors were independent on December 31, 2011.2013.

Moreover, the Board noted that the directorships of Ms. Lauvergeon and Messrs. Collomb and Pébereau will exceed twelve years on March 22, 2012 for Messrs. Collomb and Pébereau, and on May 25, 2012 for Ms. Lauvergeron, after the Shareholders’ meeting that will be invited to renew her directorship on May 11, 2012. The Board of Directors deemed that, for a company with a long-term activity and investment cycles of more than ten years, extended directorships and the corresponding experience represent an asset for the Group and a means of consolidating the independence of judgment of its Directors. The Board concluded that the proposal to renew the directorships of Ms. Lauvergeon and Messrs. Collomb and Pébereau at the Shareholders meeting in May 11, 2012, does not call their independence into question, according to the AFEP-MEDEF code, in view of their independence of judgment.

In addition, the Board of Directors has examined the situations of the directors whose nomination or ratification will be submitted to the Shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2012. Ms. Idrac and Mr. Lamarche are deemed to be independent directors.

General Management

Management form

Management form

Based onOn the recommendation byproposal of the NominatingGovernance & GovernanceEthics Committee, the Board of Directors decided, at its meeting onof May 11, 2012, to maintain the management form formally adopted at the Board meeting of May 21, 2010, to reunifynamely the positionsunification of the functions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and appoint theto confirm Mr. Christophe de Margerie in his function as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for a period equal to the positionthat of Chairman of the Board until itshis term of office expires, that is untilas director, which will expire at the end of the Shareholders’ Meeting called to approve the financial statementsaccounts for the fiscalfinancial year 2011.ending December 31, 2014.

As a result, Mr. de Margerie has been appointedserved as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL S.A. since May 21, 2010.

The Board of Directors deemed that the unified management form was the most appropriate to the Group’s business and to the specificities of the oil and gas sector.sectors. This decision was made takingtook into account the advantage of the unified management and the composition of the Board Committees of the Board that comprisewhich include a significant portionlarge proportion of independent directors, which ensuresthereby ensuring balanced authority.authority (for further information regarding the reasons for selecting the unified management form, see “— Corporate Governance — Board of Directors practices — Management form”, below).

The management form selected shallwill remain in effect until a decision to the contrary is made by the Board of Directors.

(1)

2013 net banking income estimated based on BNP Paribas as of September 30, 2013.

(2)

Based on the 2012 consolidated turnover published by Vallourec.

(3)

Not including the director representing employee shareholders, according to the recommendations made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.

98TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6

The Executive Committee

The Executive Committee, under the responsibility of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is the decision-making body of the Group.

It implements the strategy formulated by the Board of Directors and authorizes related investments, subject to the approval byof the Board of Directors for investments exceeding 3% of the Group’s equity or the notification of the Board for investments exceeding 1% of equity.

In 2013, the Executive Committee met at least twice a month, except in August when it met only once.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, the members of TOTAL’s Executive Committee were as follows:

 

Christophe de Margerie, Chairman of the Executive Committee, (ChairmanChairman and Chief Executive Officer);Officer;

François Cornélis, Vice ChairmanPhilippe Boisseau, President of the Executive Committee (President of the Chemicals division);

Michel Bénézit (President of the RefiningMarketing & Marketing division);Services and New Energies;

Yves-Louis Darricarrère, (PresidentPresident of the ExplorationUpstream (Exploration & Production division)division and Gas & Power);

Jean-Jacques Guilbaud, (ChiefChief Administrative Officer); andOfficer;

Patrick de La Chevardière, (ChiefChief Financial Officer).

In the context of the reorganization of its Downstream and Chemicals segments, TOTAL’s Executive Committee was changed on January 1, 2012. As of that date, the members of TOTAL’s Executive Committee are:

Christophe de Margerie, Chairman of the Executive Committee (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer);

Philippe Boisseau (President of the Supply & Marketing segment);

Yves-Louis Darricarrère (President of the Exploration & Production division and Gas & Power division);

Jean-Jacques Guilbaud (Chief Administrative Officer);

Patrick de La Chevardière (Chief Financial Officer);Officer; and

Patrick Pouyanné (President, President of the Refining & Chemicals segment).Chemicals.

The Management Committee

The Management Committee facilitates coordination among the different entities of the Group and monitors the operating results of the operational divisions and the activity reports of the functional divisions.

In addition to the members of the Executive Committee, the following twenty-twotwenty-three individuals from various operating divisions and non-operating departments served as members of the Management Committee as of December 31, 2011:2013:

 

 

Corporate: René Chappaz, Peter Herbel, Jean-Marc Jaubert, Manoelle Lepoutre, Jean-François Minster, Jean-Jacques Mosconi, Jacques-Emmanuel Saulnier, François Viaud;

Upstream: Marc Blaizot, Philippe Boisseau, Arnaud Breuillac, Michel Hourcard, Jacques Marraud des Grottes;

Downstream: Pierre Barbé, Alain Champeaux, Bertrand Deroubaix, Eric de Menten, André Tricoire; and

Chemicals: Françoise Leroy, Jacques Maigné, Bernard Pinatel, Patrick Pouyanné.

In addition to the members of the Executive Committee, the following twenty-five individuals from various operating divisions and non-operating departments served as members of the Management Committee as of January 16, 2012:

Corporate: René Chappaz, Peter Herbel, Jean-Marc Jaubert, Helle Kristoffersen, Manoelle Lepoutre, Françoise Leroy, Jean-François Minster, Jacques-Emmanuel Saulnier, Jérôme Schmitt, François Viaud;

 

Upstream: Marc Blaizot, Arnaud Breuillac, Olivier Cleret de Langavant, Isabelle Gaildraud, Michel Hourcard, Jacques Marraud des Grottes;Grottes, Philippe Sauquet;

 

Refining & Chemicals: Pierre Barbé, Bertrand Deroubaix, Jacques Maigné, Jean-Jacques Mosconi, Bernard Pinatel, Bernadette Spinoy; and

 

SupplyMarketing & MarketingServices: Benoît Luc, Momar Nguer, Jérôme Paré, Jérôme Schmitt.Nguer.

In addition, Jérôme Schmitt served as the Group’s Treasurer until January 1, 2012. Effective January 2, 2012, Humbert de Wendel is the Group’s Treasurer.

 

 

COMPENSATION

 

 

Approach to overall compensation

TOTAL’s approach to overall compensation (salary and employee benefits) is guided by the twin imperatives of external competitiveness, with salaries and social protection schemes positioned relative to local reference markets, and internal fairness. These shared principles are adapted in line with local factors such as labor laws, the economic context and the job market in the various countries where the Group operates.

Most of the subsidiaries that implement annual individual pay reviews attempt to position their compensation at least at the mid-point of the comparative external reference (market average).

General and merit-based increases take place yearly. Group companies may also use tools that reward collective performance (for example, in France, incentives and profit-sharing), together with base salary supplements, such as bonuses or variable portions, to better acknowledge individual contribution. The trend is towards individualized remuneration by strengthening rewards for collective and individual performance.

The HSE (Health, Safety and Environment) aspect is also taken into account when evaluating individual and collective performance. A policy is pursued that recognizes HSE performance by assessing the individual performance of managers and collective team performance. A portion of the managers’ variable compensation is based on the achievement of HSE targets set for each business segment. It may also include individual HSE objectives, for which achievement is assessed during the annual performance review. For the managers whose compensation includes a variable portion, HSE criteria can determine up to 10% of the variable portion. For all employees, the annual performance review also includes an HSE target determined with the line manager. In addition, the three-yearly profit-sharing agreement for 2012-2014 applying to the oil and

petrochemicals perimeter(1)in France includes for the first time a component of remuneration that is conditional on reaching an HSE target assessed per the business segment.

Moreover, 93% of the employees in the scope of the 2013 WHRS are employed in countries where the law guarantees a minimum wage. In the absence of legislation for the remaining 7%, the Group, at the very least, complies with the local agreements on pay (company agreements or collective conventions) or builds its own structure. The minimum compensation is always set in accordance with the above policy, which is based on external benchmarks, thereby guaranteeing compensation above the locally applicable minimum.

The development of employee shareholding is another cornerstone of the Group’s compensation policy. It is used to foster a good understanding of the Company’s core values and to create a direct link with company performance. TOTAL thus grants performance shares to a significant number of employees (about 10,000) on the basis of the Group’s achievement of overall economic goals.

In July 2013, the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. approved a performance share plan. This is the ninth plan implemented by the Group since the granting of free shares to employees has been permitted by French law and it ensures a significant replenishment rate with 39% of employees who were not beneficiaries the previous year.

The Group regularly invites its employees to subscribe to capital increases reserved for employees, the latest of which was launched in 2013. During this operation, 28,000 employees in 96 countries decided to subscribe to this capital increase, which, in addition to a conventional scheme, offered a scheme securing the employee’s investment with a guaranteed minimum return.

Moreover, TOTAL places the development of employee savings, wherever possible, at the heart of its Human Resources policy.

(1)

Including nine Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services companies in France.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.99


Item 6 - Compensation

The pension and employee benefit programs in the Group’s subsidiaries are improved every year (health insurance, life insurance). Since 2011, such improvements include the gradual introduction of a supplementary pension scheme in certain subsidiaries of Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services and the benchmarking and introduction of supplementary health and life insurance programs in eight Asian countries and for all employees in the Mexican subsidiaries in 2013. Additional improvements were made in 2013 in other countries regarding the death benefit. A life insurance program paying a minimum of two years’ salary in case of death, regardless of the cause, has been set up in a large majority of Group companies. As a result of significant changes in the scope under review (sale of large companies and integration of new, created or acquired companies), the level of coverage under this program at year-end was 86% of the workforce included in the 2013 WHRS.

Board members’ compensation

The conditions applicable to Board members’ compensation are defined by the Board of Directors on the proposal of the Compensation Committee, subject to the overall maximum amount of directors’ fees authorized by the Shareholders’ Meeting.

The overall maximum amount of directors’ fees allocated to members of the Board of Directors was set at1.11.4 million for each fiscal year by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 11, 2007.17, 2013.

In 2011,2013, the overall amount of directors’ fees allocateddue to the members of the Board of Directors was1.071.25 million, noting that there were fifteen directors as of December 31, 2011, as at year-end 2010.2013.

The allocation of the overall amount of directors’ fees for 2011 remainsfiscal year 2013 is based on an allocation schemeformula comprised of fixed compensation and variable compensation based on fixed amounts per meeting, which mademakes it possible to take into account each director’s actual attendance at the meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees.Committees, subject to the conditions below:

To take into account

a fixed annual amount of20,000 is to be paid to each director (calculated on a pro rata basis in case of a change during the creationyear), apart from the Chairman of the StrategicAudit Committee, the Board of Directors decided at its meeting of October 27, 2011,who is to set out the allocation of feesbe paid30,000 and the fixed and variable amounts per meeting as follows:other Audit Committee members, who are to be paid25,000;

a fixed amount of20,000 is to be paid to each director (calculatedprorata temporis in case of a change during the period), apart from the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who is to be paid30,000 and the other Audit Committee members, who are to be paid25,000;

an amount of5,000 per director for each Board of Directors’ meeting actually attended;

an amount of3,500 per director for each CompensationGovernance and Ethics Committee, Nominating & GovernanceCompensation Committee or Strategic Committee meeting actually attended;

an amount of7,000 per director for each Audit Committee meeting actually attended;

a premium of2,000 for travel from a country outside of France to attend a Board of Directors or Committee meeting; and

the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not receive directors’ fees as director of TOTAL S.A. or any other company of the Group.

The total amount paid to each director is determined after taking into consideration the director’s actual presence at each Board of Directors’ or Committee meeting and, if appropriate, after prorating the amount set for each director, such that the overall amount paid remains within the maximum limit set by the Shareholders’ Meeting.

SeeThese rules for allocating directors’ fees, initially defined by the Board of Directors at its meeting on October 27, 2011, were confirmed by the Board of Directors at its meeting on February 9, 2012, during which the Board also decided to prorate the total amounts paid to each director if the maximum amount authorized by the Shareholders’ Meeting is exceeded. These rules were again confirmed by the Board of Directors at its meeting on February 12, 2013.

At the same Board meeting, it was decided that the amount of fees paid to directors for a fiscal year will be paid, on the decision of the Board of Directors and following a proposal of the Governance and Ethics Committee, at the beginning of the next fiscal year.

100TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Compensation

The table below presents the total compensation (including in-kind benefits) due and paid to each director in office during the last two fiscal years (Article L. 225-102-1 of the French Commercial Code, 1st and 2nd paragraphs).

Directors’ fees and other compensation due and paid to the executive and non-executive directors (mandataires sociaux) (AMF Table No. 3):

    Fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012
  

Fiscal year ended

December 31, 2013

 
(Gross amount —)  Amounts due  Amounts paid  Amounts due  Amounts paid 

Christophe de Margerie

     

Directors’ fees

   none    none    none    none  

Other compensation

   (a)   (a)   (a)   (a) 

Thierry Desmarest

     

Directors’ fees

   76,014    76,014    89,500      

Other compensation: retirement pension(b)

   575,290    575,290    578,940    578,940  

Patrick Artus

     

Directors’ fees

   72,921    72,921    79,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Patricia Barbizet

     

Directors’ fees

   118,883    118,883    134,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Daniel Bouton(c)

     

Directors’ fees

   28,472    28,472          

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Gunnar Brock

     

Directors’ fees

   79,992    79,992    102,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Claude Clément(d)

     

Directors’ fees

   60,546    60,546    31,000      

Other compensation

   102,883    102,883    92,153    92,153  

Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette

     

Directors’ fees

   100,763    100,763    129,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Bertrand Collomb

     

Directors’ fees

   69,827    69,827    67,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Paul Desmarais, jr.

     

Directors’ fees

   64,966    64,966    47,000      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Anne-Marie Idrac(e)

     

Directors’ fees

   32,075    32,075    75,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Charles Keller(f)

     

Directors’ fees

           36,000      

Other compensation

           64,586    64,586  

Barbara Kux

     

Directors’ fees

   71,153    71,153    79,000      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Gérard Lamarche

     

Directors’ fees

   121,695    121,695    143,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Anne Lauvergeon

     

Directors’ fees

   60,546    60,546    65,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Claude Mandil

     

Directors’ fees

   69,827    69,827    93,000      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Michel Pébereau

     

Directors’ fees

   65,408    65,408    77,500      

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Thierry de Rudder(g)

     

Directors’ fees

   6,912    6,912          

Other compensation

   none    none    none      

Total

   1,778,173    1,778,173    1,986,679    735,679  

(a)

For the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, see the summary compensation tables in— Summarytables (AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code — AMFposition-recommendations No. 2009-16)”, below. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not receive directors’ fees as director of TOTAL S.A. or any other company of the Group.

(b)

Mr. Desmarest does not receive any compensation for duties related to representing the Group internationally.

(c)

Director until May 11, 2012.

(d)

Director representing employee shareholders until May 17, 2013.

(e)

Director since May 11, 2012.

(f)

Director representing employee shareholders since May 17, 2013.

(g)

Director until January 12, 2012.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.101


Item 6 - Compensation

Over the past two years, the directors currently in office have not received any compensation or in-kind benefits from companies controlled by TOTAL S.A., except for Mr. Clément, who is an employee of Total Raffinage-Chimie.

The compensation indicated in the table “Directors’ Feesabove (except for that of the Chairman and Other Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Clément, Mr. Keller and Mr. Desmarest) consists solely of directors’ fees (gross amount) due for the period under review. Moreover, there is no service contract linking a Director to TOTAL S.A. or any companies controlled by it which provides for benefits under such contract.

Compensation Receivedof the executive directors

Compensation policy for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

General principles

The policy related to the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is approved by Directors” below for additional compensation information.

Policythe Board of Directors on the proposal of the Compensation Committee. It is determined in accordance with the “Principles and rules for determining the compensation and other benefits of the corporate executive officers

Based on a proposal by the Compensation Committee, the Board adopted the following policy for determining the compensation and other benefits of the corporate executive officers (the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer):Officer”.

CompensationThese principles and benefits for the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer are setrules, approved by the Board of Directors after considering proposals fromat its meeting on February 9, 2012, are presented in the Chairman’s Report on Corporate Governance. They are based on the fundamental principles for determining the compensation of the executive directors set out in the AFEP-MEDEF Code and ensure the consistency and stability of the compensation policy in line with the Group’s strategy.

The Board of Directors and Compensation Committee. SuchCommittee pay special attention to ensuring that the compensation shall bepolicy is structured to create long-term value for the company (in particular by introducing non-financial performance indicators) and is proportionate to the responsibility assumed while remaining reasonable and fair, in a context that values both teamwork and motivation within the Company.company.

Compensation forThey also ensure a balance among the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer is related to market practice, work performed, results obtained and responsibilities held.

Compensation for the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer includes both a fixed portion and a variable portion. The fixed portion is reviewed at least every two years.

The amount of variable compensation is reviewed each year and may not exceed a stated percentage of fixed compensation. Variable compensation is determined based on pre-defined quantitative and qualitative criteria that are periodically reviewed by the Board of Directors. Quantitative criteria are limited in number, objective, measurable and adapted to the Group’s strategy.

Variable compensation is designed to reward short-term performance and progress towards medium-term objectives. The compensation is determined in line with the annual assessment of the performance of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s medium-term strategy.

The Board of Directors keeps track of the fixed and variable portions of the compensation of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer over several years and in light of the Company’s performance.

The Group does not have a specific pension plan for the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer. They are eligible for retirement benefits and pensions available to certain employee categories in the Group under conditions determined by the Board.

Stock options and performance shares are designed to align the long-term interests of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer with those of the shareholders.

The allocation of options and performance shares to the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer is examined in the light of all the forms of compensation of each person.

The exercise price for stock options awarded is not discounted compared to the market price, at the time of the grant, for the underlying share.

Stock options and performance shares are awarded at regular intervals to prevent any opportunistic behavior.

The exercise of options and the definitive allocation of performance shares to which the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer are entitled are subjected to performance criteria that must be met over several years.

The Board puts in place restrictions on the transfer of a portion of shares held upon the exercise of options and the definitive allocation of performance shares, applicable to the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer until the end of their term of office.

The Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer may be entitled to stock options or performance shares when they leave office.

After three years in office, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are required to hold at least the number of Company shares set by the Board.

Thevarious components of the compensation of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer are made public after the meeting of the Board of Directors that approves them.

Compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

TheOfficer’s compensation paid to Mr. de Margerie for his duties as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was set by the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A., based on a

recommendation by the Compensation Committee in line with the guidance of the AFEP-MEDEF Corporate Governance Code.

It includes an annual fixed base salary of1,500,000, and a(fixed portion, variable portion, not to exceed 165% oflong-term performance share compensation plan). The benefit accruing from participation in the fixed base salary. The fixed base salary was set by comparison withpension plans is taken into consideration when determining the compensation paidpolicy applicable to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in line with the principles of other Frenchthe AFEP-MEDEF Code.

The relative position of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to that of comparable issuers (in particular, CAC 40 companies includedand issuers operating in the CAC 40 index. oil and gas sectors) is examined every year, if necessary on the basis of studies undertaken by specialized firms.

The maximum percentageChairman and Chief Executive Officer does not take part in any discussions or deliberations of the corporate bodies regarding items on the agenda of Board of Directors’ meetings related to the assessment of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s performance or the determination of the components comprising his compensation.

Compensation policy for fiscal year 2014

On February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors, on the proposal of the Compensation Committee, decided that the compensation of

Mr. de Margerie as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2014 will consist of a fixed base salary representedof1,500,000, unchanged from the amount set by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010, and a variable portion, isto be paid in 2015, not exceeding 180% of the base salary, based in particular on equivalent practicepractices at a reference sample of companies including oil and gas companies.operating in the energy sectors.

The variable portion is based on criteria determined byOn the proposal of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors. The equivalent ofDirectors also decided to maintain for fiscal year 2014 the various criteria for determining the variable portion defined in 2013, after confirming their appropriateness based on the Group’s strategic priorities.

Consequently, the various criteria used for determining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable portion for fiscal year 2014 will be based, for up to 100% of the fixed base salary, is linkedon economic parameters that refer to quantitative targets reflecting the Group’s performance (with these economic criteria, which variesparameters assessed on a straight-linelinear basis between two performance levels to avoid threshold effects. The criteria basedeffects) and, for up to 80% of the base salary, on the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution, account for an additional amount that cannot exceed 65%which allows a qualitative assessment of the fixed base salary.management.

The economic criteria were selected so as to not only reward short-term performance in terms of return on investment for shareholders, but also the progress made by the Group toward medium-term objectives by comparison with data for the oil and gas industry as a whole. They include:

 

return on equity for a maximum of 50% of the base salary; and

o

return on equity for up to 50% of the base salary;

o 

the Company’s earnings performance comparedresults, in comparison with thatthe results of the four other major internationalcompeting oil companies that are its competitors(1), assessed by reference to the average growth over three years of two indicators, net earnings per share and consolidated net income. Each indicator representshas a maximumweighting of up to 25% of the base salary.

The expected levels of attainment of the quantitative economic parameter targets for determining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable portion were clearly defined by the Board of Directors at its meeting on February 11, 2014, but have not been made public for reasons of confidentiality.

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution is evaluatedwill be assessed, for up to 80% of the base salary, based on six pre-determined, clearly defined quantitative or qualitative criteria, each with a weighting of up to 13 to 15% of the basis of objective, mainly operational criteria related to the Group’s business segments and established in line with its strategy, including health, safety and environment (HSE) performance and oil and gas production and reserves growth.base salary. These include:

With respect to the fiscal year 2011, the Board of Directors at its meeting of February 9, 2012, after having found that

o

Health, Safety and Environment performance, measured mainly according to attainment of the annual Total Recordable Injury Rate (TRIR) target;

o

the increase in hydrocarbon production;

o

the increase in hydrocarbon reserves;

o

the performance of the Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments assessed on the basis of the annual targets of these segments;

o

the success of key negotiations involving the Group’s strategy;

the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s objectives related to personal contribution were deemed to be substantially fulfilled and assessed to what extent financial performance criteria had been met, the Board set the

o

CSR performance, which is measured in particular according to attainment of the CO2 emissions and energy efficiency targets and the Group’s position in the rankings of non-financial rating agencies.

 

 

 

(1)

ExxonMobil, BP, ShellRoyal Dutch-Shell and Chevron.

102TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Compensation

variable portion payable to Mr. de Margerie in 2012 at1,530,000 for his contribution in 2011, equivalent to 102% of his fixed base salary.

The total gross compensation paid to Mr. de Margerie in his role as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was made upwill also continue to have the use of a fixed base salary of1,500,000company car and be covered by a variable portion of1,530,000 forlife insurance plan.

Commitments made to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: pension plans, termination payments and other commitments(Article L. 225-102-1, paragraph 3, of the French Commercial Code)

The commitments made to the 2011 fiscal year, to be paid in 2012.

Mr. de Margerie’s total gross compensation asChairman and Chief Executive Officer regarding pension and life insurance plans, retirement benefit and termination payment for removal from office or non-renewal of his term of office, as described below, were approved by the Board of Directors on February 9, 2012 and by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 11, 2012, in accordance with Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code.

Pension plans

Pursuant to applicable law, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is eligible for the period between January 1, 2010basic French social security pension and May 21, 2010 wasfor pension benefits under the ARRCO (Association pour le Régime de Retraite Complémentaire des Salariés) and AGIRC (Association Générale des Institutions de Retraite des Cadres) government-sponsored supplementary pension schemes.

1,030,359, composedHe also participates in the internal defined contribution pension plan known as RECOSUP. This pension plan represented a booked expense to the Company in favor of a fixed base salary of507,097 and a variable portion of523,262 paid in 2011. Mr. de Margerie’s total gross compensation asthe Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the period between May 22, 2010 and December 31, 2010 was1,977,763, composed of a fixed base salaryfiscal year 2013 of919,355 and a variable portion of1,058,408 paid in 2011.2,222.

AsThe Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mr. de Margerie has the use ofalso participates in a company car, receives the health coverage provided for Group employees and is eligible for the life insurance plan open to the Group’s executive officers (see “— Pensions and other commitments” below).

See the tables “Summary of compensation, stock options and performance shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer” and “Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation” below for additional compensation information.

Executive officer compensation

In 2011, the aggregate amount paid directly or indirectly by the French and foreign companies belonging to the Group of the Company as compensation to the executive officers of TOTAL in office at December 31, 2011 (members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer) as a group was20.4 million (twenty-nine individuals), including9 million paid to the six members of the Executive Committee. Variable compensation accounted for 42.4% of the aggregate amount of20.4 million paid to executive officers.

Pensions and other commitments

1)Pursuant to applicable law, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is eligible for the basic French social security pension and for pension benefits under the ARRCO (Association pour le Régime de RetraiteComplémentaire des Salariés) and AGIRC (Association Générale des Institutions de Retraite des Cadres) government-sponsored supplementary pension schemes. He also participates in the internal defined
contribution pension plan and the defined benefit supplementary pension plan, known as RECOSUP, created by the Company. This supplementary pension plan, which is not limited to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is described in point 2 below.

The sum of the supplementary pension plan benefitsset up and external pensionfinanced by the Company. This plan, benefits may not exceed 45%for which management is outsourced, applies to all employees of the compensation used as the calculation basis. In the event this percentage is exceeded, the supplementary pension is reduced accordingly.

The compensation taken into account when calculating the supplementary pension is the retiree’s final three-year average gross compensation (fixed and variable portions).

As of December 31, 2011, Mr. de Margerie’s aggregate benefit entitlement under all of the above pension plans would amount to 22.31% of his grossGroup whose annual compensation receivedis greater than eight times the ceiling for calculating French social security contributions (37,548 in 2011 (2011 fixed base salary and variable portion for 2010, paid in 2011)2014). Compensation above this amount does not qualify as pensionable compensation under either government-sponsored or contractual pension schemes.

2)The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer participates in a defined benefit supplementary pension plan financed and managed by TOTAL S.A. and open to all employees of the Group whose annual compensation is greater than eight times the ceiling for calculating French social security contributions (36,372 in 2012). Compensation above this amount does not qualify as pensionable compensation under either government-sponsored or contractual pension schemes.

To be eligible for this supplementary pension plan, participants must meet specific age and length of service (five years) criteria. They must also still be employed by the CompanyGroup’s company upon retirement, unless they retire due to disability or hadhave taken early retirement at the Group’s initiative after the age of 55.fifty-five.

The plan provides participants with a pension equal to the sum of 1.8% of the portion of the reference compensation between eight and forty times the annual ceiling for calculating French social security contributions and 1% of the reference compensation between forty and sixty times the annual ceiling for calculating French social security contributions, which is multiplied by the number of years of service (up to twenty years). ItThe basis for the calculation of this supplementary plan is adjusted in line withindexed to changes in the valueARRCO pension point. The sum of the ARRCOsupplementary pension pointplan benefits and strictly cappedexternal pension plan benefits may not exceed 45% of the compensation used as described in point 1 above.the calculation basis. In the event this percentage is exceeded, the supplementary pension is reduced accordingly.

AsThe compensation taken into account to calculate the supplementary pension is the retiree’s last 3-year average gross compensation (fixed and variable portions).

In the case of December 31, 2011, the Group’s pension obligations to Mr. de Margerie, to date, the ceilings applicable for determining the amount of the retirement pension he may benefit from under the terms of this defined

benefit supplementary pension plan representedhave been reached, both in terms of seniority (Mr. de Margerie joined the equivalentGroup in 1974) and compensation (his last 3-year average gross

compensation is more than the threshold of 18.01%sixty times the annual ceiling for calculating French social security contributions,i.e.,2,221,920 in 2013).

The commitments made to him by TOTAL S.A. under the terms of the defined benefit supplementary pension plans and similar would thus, as of December 31, 2013, represent a gross annual retirement pension estimated at582,000,i.e., 17.96% of the gross annual compensation paid to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2013 (fixed portion for 2013 and variable portion for fiscal year 2012).

The Group’s commitments related to these defined benefit supplementary pension plans and similar (including the retirement benefit mentionedin “— Termination payment and retirement benefit”, below, is outsourced to an insurance company for almost its entire amount; the not outsourced balance being evaluated on an annual basis and subject to an adjustment through a provision in the accounts. The Group’s commitments amount, as of December 31, 2013, to19.1 million for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (34.8 million for the executive and non executive directors (mandataires sociaux) participating in these plans including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer). These amounts represent the gross value of the Group’s commitments to these beneficiaries based on a statistical life expectancy, and include the additional tax contribution for an amount of 30% on pensions that exceed eight annual ceilings for social security, payable by the Company to the French administration in charge of collecting social security contributions (URSSAF) (i.e.,4.0 million for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and7.6 million for the concerned executive and non executive directors including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer).

The sum of all the pension plans in which Mr. de Margerie participates would, as of December 31, 2013, represent a gross annual retirement pension estimated to718,500,i.e., 22.17% of his gross annual compensation paid in 2011.2013 (fixed portion for 2013 and variable portion for fiscal year 2012).

In line with the principles used to determine the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as set out in the AFEP-MEDEF Code to which the Company refers, the Board of Directors has taken account of the benefit conferred through participation in the pension plans when determining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation.

 

3)

Termination payment and retirement benefit

o

Retirement benefit:The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is also entitled to a lump-sum retirement benefit equal to that available to eligible members of the Group under the French National Collective Bargaining Agreement for the Petroleum Industry. This benefit amounts to 25% of the gross annual compensation (fixed and variable portions) received induring the 12-month period preceding retirement. Pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code, such benefit is subject to the performance conditions detailed in point 7 below.executive director’s retirement.

ThisPursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code, entitlement to this benefit is subject to the performance conditions detailed below.

The retirement benefit cannot be combined with the compensation for loss of officetermination payment described in point 5 below.

 

4)The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also participates in the same life insurance plan as the Group’s employees, covering supplementary benefits or annuities in the event of temporary incapacity for work and disability, together with a life insurance plan funded by the Company and open to the executive officers of the Group. Upon death, the plan guarantees a payment equal to two years’ gross compensation (fixed and variable portions), increased to three years upon accidental death, as well as, in the event of disability, a payment proportional to the degree of disability.

5)o

Termination payment:If the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is removed from office or his term of office is not renewed by the Company, he is entitled to compensation for loss of officetermination payment equal to two years’ gross annual compensation. The calculation will be based on the gross compensation (including both fixed and variable

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.103


Item 6 - Compensation

portions) paid inof the 12-month period preceding the date of termination or non-renewal of his term of office.

This compensation for loss of office totermination payment will be paid in the event of a change of control or a change of strategy of the Company wouldstrategy. It will not be due in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct or if the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer leaves the Company of his own volition, accepts new responsibilities within the Group, or may claim full retirement benefits within a short time period.

Pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code, entitlement to this benefit is subject to the performance conditions detailed in point 7 below.

6)Commitments with regard to the pension and life insurance plans for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the retirement benefit and compensation for loss of office arrangements set out in point 5 were approved on May 21, 2010, by the Board of Directors and by the Shareholders’ Meeting.

 

7)o

Performance condition:In addition, in complianceaccordance with Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code, the commitments described in points 3Board of Directors decided, at its meeting on February 9, 2012, to make entitlement to termination payment and 5 are subject toretirement benefit contingent upon a performance conditions that are deemedcondition which is considered to be metfulfilled if at least two of the following three criteria set out below are satisfied:met:

 

the average ROE (return on equity) over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the officerChairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is at least 12%;

the average ROACE (return on average capital employed) over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the officerChairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is at least 10%;

TOTAL’s oil and gas production growth over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the officerChairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is greater than or equal to the average production growth rate of the four other major internationalcompeting oil companies that are its competitors:companies: ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP and Chevron.

In compliance with the AFEP-MEDEF Corporate Governance Code, the Board of Directors decided that payment of the lump-sum retirement benefit or compensation for loss of office shall be subject to demanding performance conditions combining both internal and external performance criteria.

The threeThese criteria were selected to take into account the Company’s general interest, shareholder interests and standard market practices, especially in the oil and gas industry.

More specifically, the ROE enablesperformance criterion allows the termination payment of theand retirement benefit or compensation for loss of office to be tied to the Company’s overall shareholder return. Shareholders can use ROE to gauge the Company’s ability to generate profit from the capital they have invested and from prior years’year earnings reinvested in the Company.

ROACE is used by most oil and gas companies to assess the operational performance of average capital employed, regardless of whether it is funded by equity or debt. ROACE is an indicator of the return on capital employed by the Companycompany for operational activities and, as a result, makes it possible to tie the payment of thetermination payment and retirement benefit or compensation for loss of office to the value created for the Company.company.

The third and last criterion used by the Board of Directors is the Group’s oil and gas production growth compared with that of its competitors. This indicator is widely used in the industry to measure operational performance and the ability to ensure the sustainable development of the Group, most of whose capital expenditure is allocated to exploration and productionUpstream activities.

 

8)In addition, regarding the implementation of the pension commitments described in points 1 and 2
 

above made by the Company for directors for fiscal year 2011, the annual supplementary pension received by Mr. Desmarest in relation to his previous employment by the Group was approximatelyLife insurance plan562,354 (December 31, 2011 value), adjusted in line with changes in the value of the ARRCO pension point.

In accordance with the decisions made by the Board of Directors on February 11, 2009, confirmed by the Board of Directors’ decision on February 9, 2012 and May 11, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is covered by a life insurance plan paid by the Company. This plan guarantees, upon death, a payment equal to two years’ gross compensation (fixed and variable portions), increased to three years in case of accidental death and, in the event of permanent disability due to an accident, a payment proportional to the degree of disability.

9)As of December 31, 2011, the total amount of the Group’s commitments under pension plans and similar for company officers is equal to31.2 million.
 

Summary table (AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code — AMF position-recommendations No. 2009-16) (AMF Table No. 11):

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Summary table at February 29, 2012directors Employment

contract

 Retirement benefit and supplementarySupplementary pension plans BenefitsPayments or advantagesbenefits due
or likely to be due upon
termination or change of officein
duties
 Benefits
related to a
non-compete
agreement

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

NOYESYESNO

Start of theterm of office: February 2007(a)

TermEnd of current term of office:

The Shareholders’ Meeting calledheld in 20122015 to approve the financial statements for the year endingended December 31, 20112014

 NO 

YES

(retirement benefit)(b)

(internalInternal defined benefit supplementary pension plan(c) and corporate RECOSUP defined contribution pension plan known as RECOSUP(d) which is also applicable to certain Group employees)employees

 

YESTermination payment(b)

(compensation for loss of office)Retirement benefit(e)(b)

 NO

 

(a)

Chief Executive Officer since February 13, 2007, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since May 21, 2010.2010; Chief Executive Officer since February 14, 2007

(b)

Payment subject to a performance conditionscondition in accordance with the decision of the Board of Directors on February 11, 2009, and confirmed by the Board of Directors on May 15, 2009 and May 21, 2010.9, 2012. Details of these commitments are set out in points 3 and 7 above. ThisThe retirement benefit cannot be combined with the compensation for loss of officetermination payment described below.above.

(c)

Representing anAn annual pension that would be equivalent, as of December 31, 2011,2013, to 18.01%17.96% of the annual compensation for 2011.received in 2013.

(d)

Mr. de Margerie’s pension benefit represented a booked expense of2,1212,222 for fiscal year 2011.2013.

Compensation due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013

Fixed and variable elements of compensation

The compensation paid to Mr. de Margerie as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 was approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting on February 11, 2014, further to the proposal of the Compensation Committee, in accordance with the compensation policy defined by the Board of Directors at its meeting on February 12, 2013.

This compensation consists of a base salary (fixed portion) of1,500,000, unchanged from the amount set by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010, together with a variable portion (paid in 2014) amounting to1,987,200, which corresponds to 132.48% of his fixed annual compensation which was determined as follows.

At its meeting on February 12, 2013, the Board of Directors, further to the proposal of the Compensation Committee, decided that the compensation of Mr. de Margerie as Chairman and Chief

104TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Compensation

Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 would consist of a fixed base salary of1,500,000, unchanged from the amount set by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010, and a variable portion, to be paid in 2014, not exceeding 180% (instead of 165% in 2012) of the base salary, based in particular on practices at a reference sample of companies operating in the energy sectors.

The Board of Directors, at this same meeting on February 12, 2013, also decided that the various criteria used for determining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable portion should be based, for up to 100% of the base salary, on economic parameters that refer to quantitative targets reflecting the Group’s performance (with these economic parameters assessed on a linear basis between two levels of performance to avoid threshold effects) and, for up to 80% of the base salary, on the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution, which allows a qualitative assessment of management based on six pre-determined, clearly defined criteria (each criterion can have a weighting of up to 13 to 15% of the base salary).

At its meeting on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors, after reviewing the attainment of the economic parameters as well as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution for fiscal year 2013, set the variable portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for fiscal year 2013 at 132.48% of his annual fixed compensation,i.e.,1,987,200 (compared to 116.11%,i.e.,1,741,000 for fiscal year 2012). 77.48% relates to the share for the different selected economic parameters and 55% relates to the share for the personal contribution of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer determined on the basis of a detailed evaluation of six pre-determined, clearly defined criteria.

Concerning the economic parameters, the return on equity of the Group was lower in 2013 than in 2012, but the Group’s performance, in comparison to its main competitors (in terms of earnings per share and net income), were considerably higher in 2013 than in 2012 , which led to an increase of the part allocated for the different economic parameters compared to the previous fiscal year (77.48% of the fixed compensation for fiscal year 2013 compared to 64.11% for fiscal year 2012).

Concerning the personal contribution, the Board of Directors considered that most of the objectives were achieved, particularly the targets in terms of Safety, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and concerning the success of strategic negotiations in producing countries. The personal contribution was then set to 55% (against a maximum of 80%) for fiscal year 2013 compared to 52% (against a maximum of 65%) for fiscal year 2012.

Consequently, the amount of the variable portion of Mr. de Margerie’s compensation for fiscal year 2013 (paid in 2014) was1,987,200, which corresponds to 132.48% of his fixed annual compensation.

In 2013, Mr. de Margerie also continued to have the use of a company car and be covered by a life insurance plan paid by the Company. These benefits were booked in the amount of56,472 in the Consolidated Financial Statements at December 31, 2013.

Grant of performance shares or stock options in 2013

Pursuant to the authorization of the Company’s Combined Shareholders’ Meeting of May 13, 2011 (eleventh resolution) and further to the proposal of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors decided, at its meeting on July 25, 2013, to grant

Mr. de Margerie 53,000 outstanding performance shares of the Company (corresponding to 0.0022% of the share capital on the grant date). The shares were awarded as part of a broader share grant plan approved by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013 related to 0.19% of the share capital for nearly 10,000 beneficiaries.

The number of shares granted (53,000 performance shares) was stable compared to the previous year. As in 2012, no stock options were awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2013.

The definitive grant of all the performance shares is subject to the beneficiary’s continued presence at the Group during the vesting period and to performance conditions related to the Group’s return on equity (ROE) and return on average capital employed (ROACE) for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015.

o

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and less than 16%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.

o

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

The ROE and ROACE values used to assess the performance conditions will be those published by the Group in the first quarters of 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015.

Pursuant to the provisions of the French Commercial Code, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be required to hold in registered form, for as long as he remains in office, 50% of the capital gains, net of tax and related contributions, on the shares granted. When the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer holds a number of shares(1) corresponding to five times his gross annual fixed compensation at that time, this holding requirement will be equal to 10%. If in the future this condition is no longer met, the previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply. Given this holding requirement and given the share holding requirements that the Board of Directors impose on the executive directors whereby such directors must hold a number of shares of the Company equivalent in value to two years of the fixed portion of their annual compensation, and given the number of TOTAL shares and shares of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund (invested exclusively in TOTAL shares) effectively held by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors decided not to make the grant of performance shares contingent

(1)

Directly or through collective investment funds invested in Company stock.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.105


Item 6 - Compensation

upon the purchase of a quantity of shares once the awarded shares become transferable, thus disregarding one of the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF Code to which the Company adheres.

Furthermore, the Board of Directors noted that, pursuant to the Board’s rules of procedure applicable to each director, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer cannot hedge the shares of the Company and any financial instruments related to them, and has taken note of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s commitment to not use such hedging transactions, including on the performance shares awarded.

Subject to the specific provisions set out above, the grant of performance shares to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is governed by the same provisions that apply to other beneficiaries of the performance share grant plan approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting on July 25, 2013. In particular, these provisions state that shares definitively awarded at the end of the 3-year vesting period will, following validation of the presence and performance conditions, be automatically registered on the first day of the 2-year holding period and will be non-transferable until the end of the holding period.

Other forms of compensation due or granted for fiscal year 2013

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer did not benefit from any other forms of compensation due or granted for fiscal year 2013. The Board of Directors has not awarded any multi-year or deferred variable compensation or any extraordinary compensation for fiscal year 2013.

It should also be noted that the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not receive directors’ fees as director of TOTAL S.A. or any other company of the Group.

Summary tables (AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code — AMF position-recommendations No. 2009-16)

Summary of compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (AMF Table No. 2):

Fiscal year ended December 31,  2012   2013 
()  Amount due for
the fiscal year
  Amount paid during
the fiscal year
 (a)
   Amount due for
the fiscal year
   Amount paid during
the fiscal year
 (a)
 

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (since May 21, 2010)

       

Fixed compensation

   1,500,000    1,500,000     1,500,000     1,500,000  

Annual variable compensation(b)

   1,741,000(b)   1,530,000     1,987,200     1,741,000  

Extraordinary compensation

                   

Directors’ fees

                   

In-kind benefits(c)

   7,409    7,409     56,472     56,472  

Total

   3,248,409    3,037,409     3,543,672     3,297,472  

(a)

Variable portion paid for prior fiscal year.

(e)(b)

Payment subjectThe variable portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is calculated by taking into account the Group’s return on equity, changes in earnings compared with those of the other major competing oil companies, and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution based on objective and, for the most part, operational target criteria. The variable portion paid to performance conditions in accordance with the decisionChairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2012 could reach a maximum amount of 165% of his base salary. The variable portion due for 2012, determined by the Board of Directors on February 11, 2009,12, 2013 based on attainment of the economic performance criteria and confirmedan assessment of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution, represents 116.11% of his base salary (i.e.,1,741,000 rounded down to the nearest thousand euros).

(c)

Mr. de Margerie has the use of a company car and is covered by a life insurance plan paid by the BoardCompany. For 2013, the benefit corresponding to the life insurance plan by which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is covered was itemized and estimated at48,360.

Summary of compensation, stock options and performance shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (AMF Table No. 1):

Fiscal year  2012   2013 

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (since May 21, 2010)

    

Compensationdue in respect of the fiscal year ()(a) (detailed in AMF Table No. 2 above)

   3,248,409     3,543,672  

Valuation of multi-year variable compensation awarded during the fiscal year ()

          

Accounting valuation of the stock options awarded during the fiscal year ()(b) (see AMF Table No. 4 below)

          

Number of options awarded

          

Accounting valuation of performance shares awarded during the fiscal year ()(c) (see AMF Table No. 6 below)

   1,664,730     1,729,920  

Number of performance shares awarded

   53,000     53,000  

Total

   4,913,139     5,273,592  

Note:The valuation of Directorsoptions and performance shares awarded corresponds to a valuation performed in accordance with IFRS 2 (see Notes 1E and 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and not to any compensation actually received during the fiscal year. Entitlement to options and performance shares is subject to fulfillment of performance conditions assessed over a period of two or three years depending on May 15, 2009the plans.
(a)

Including in-kind benefits. Mr. de Margerie has the use of a company car and May 21, 2010. Detailsis covered by a life insurance plan paid by the Company.

(b)

The valuation of these commitments are set out in points 5 options awarded is calculated on the day they were awarded using the Black-Scholes model based on the assumptions used for the Consolidated Financial Statements (see Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(c)

The valuation of performance shares awarded was calculated on the day they were awarded (see Note 1E to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

106TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Compensation

Performance shares awarded in 2013 to each executive director by the issuer and by any Group company (Extract from AMF Table No. 6):

    Plan date
and No.
   Number of
shares
awarded
during
fiscal year
  Valuation of
shares ()(a)
   Acquisition
date
   Dat of
transferability
   

Performance

condition

Christophe de MargerieChairman and Chief Executive Officer   
 
2013 Plan
07/25/2013
 
  
  53,000   1,729,920     07/26/2016     07/26/2018    For 50% of the shares, the condition is based on the Group’s average ROE in 2013, 2014 and 2015. For 50% of the shares, the condition is based on the Group’s average ROACE in 2013, 2014 and 2015

(a)

The valuation of performance shares was calculated on the day they were awarded, according to the method used for the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Stock options awarded in 2013 to each executive director by the issuer and by any Group company (AMF Table No. 4):

Plan date
and 7 above.No.
Nature of options
(purchase or
subscription)
Valuation of
options ()(a)
Number of options
awarded during
fiscal year
Exercise
price
Exercise
period

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(a)

According to the method used for the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Executive officers’ compensation

In 2013, the aggregate amount paid directly or indirectly by the French and foreign Group companies as compensation to the executive officers(1) of TOTAL in office at December 31, 2013 (members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer) was22.1 million (thirty individuals), including9.3 million paid to the six members of the Executive Committee. Variable compensation accounted for 45% of the aggregate amount of22.1 million paid to executive officers.

Stock optionsoption and performance share grants policy

General policy

In addition to its policy to develop employee shareholding, TOTAL S.A. is also pursuing a policy to associate employees and executive officers with the Group’s future results. This policy consists in awarding free performance shares each year. TOTAL S.A. may also award stock options despite the fact that no plan has been put in place since September 14, 2011.

Stock options and performance share grants put in place by TOTAL S.A. concern only TOTAL shares. No options for or grants of performance shares of any of the Group’s listed subsidiaries are awarded by TOTAL S.A.

All grants are approved by the Board of Directors, based on recommendations bythe proposal of the Compensation Committee. For each plan, the Compensation Committee recommends a list of beneficiaries, the conditions and the number of options or performance shares awarded to each beneficiary. The Board of Directors then gives final approval for this list and the grant conditions.

Grants of performance shares under selective plans become definitive at the end of a vesting period which has been extended to three years for shares granted as of July 25, 2013. However,

such grants only become definitive subject to a presence condition and a performance condition based on the Group’s return on equity (ROE). At the end of this vesting period, and provided that the conditions set are met, the performance shares are definitively awarded to the beneficiaries, who must then hold them for at least two years (holding period). For beneficiaries employed by non-French subsidiaries on the grant date, the vesting period for performance shares may be increased to four years; in such cases, there is no mandatory holding period. As of 2011, all performance shares granted to executive officers are subject to performance conditions.

Stock options have a term of eight years, with an exercise price set at the average of the closing TOTAL share prices on Euronext Paris during the twenty trading days prior to the grant date, without any discount. The exercisingexercise of the options is subject to a presence condition and performance conditions, (basedbased on the return on equity

(ROE) of the Group) thatGroup, which vary depending on the plan and beneficiary category. As of 2011, all options granted are subject to performance conditions. SubjectFor options that may be awarded pursuant to the authorization given by the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of May 17, 2013 (11th resolution), performance conditions will be assessed over a minimum period of three consecutive fiscal years. For earlier option plans, and subject to the applicable presence condition and applicable performance conditions being met, options may only be exercised afteronly at the end of an initial two-year2-year vesting period and the shares issued uponresulting from the exercise are subject tomay only be disposed of at the end of a two-year mandatorysecond 2-year holding period. However,Moreover, for the 2007 to 2011 option plans, the shares resulting from the exercise of options awarded to beneficiaries employed by non-French subsidiaries at the grant date can be converted to bearer form or transferred after the 2-year vesting period at the end of which the options may be exercised.

Performance shares awarded under selective plans become final after a two-year vesting period, subject to a presence condition and a performance condition based on the return on equity (ROE) of the Group. At the end of this vesting period, and provided that the conditions set are satisfied, the performance share grants are finally awarded. However, these shares may not be transferred prior to the end of an additional two-year mandatory holding period. For beneficiaries employed by non-French subsidiaries on the grant date the vesting period for performance shares

may be increaseddisposed of or converted to four years; in such cases, there would be no mandatory holdingbearer form at the end of the first 2-year vesting period. As of 2011, all performance shares granted

Performance share and stock option grants to executive officersthe Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are subject to a presence condition within

(1)

Executive officers who are not directors (with the exception of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer).

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.107


Item 6 - Compensation

the Group and specific performance conditions.conditions related to the Group’s return on equity (ROE) and return on average capital employed (ROACE) set by the Board of Directors, on the proposal of the Compensation Committee.

The grantaward of these options or performance shares or stock options is used to extend, based uponon individual performance assessments at the time of each plan, the Group-wide policy of developing employee shareholding (for further information, see “— Employeesshareholding.

Follow up of the grants to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Stock options

No stock options were awarded in 2012 or 2013.

Until 2011, the Chairman and Share Ownership — ArrangementsChief Executive Officer was awarded stock options as part of broader share grant plans approved by the Board of Directors for involvingcertain Group employees in the Company’s share capital” below).

Stockand executive officers. Subject to certain specific provisions set out below, options and performance share grantsgranted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are subjectgoverned by the same provisions that apply to specific performance conditions set out below.other beneficiaries of grant plans.

GrantsAs of 2007, the Board of Directors has made the exercise of options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has been awarded share subscription options, the exercise of which has been subject, since 2007, to contingent upon a presence condition and performance conditions based on the Group’s ROE and ROACE. The reasonsconditions are set out below for selecting these criteria are detailed in point 7the 2010 and 2011 plans. The acquisition rate of “— Pensionsperformance-related options under the 2009, 2010 and other commitments” above.2011 plans was 100%. It had been 60% for the 2008 plan.

Pursuant to Article L. 225-185 of the French Commercial Code, the Board of Directors decided that, for the 2007 to 2011 share subscription option plans, the corporate officersexecutive directors (the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, and asthen from May 21, 2010 the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) arewould be required to hold in registered form, for as long as they remain in office, a number of TOTAL shares representing 50% of the capital gains, net of tax and other deductions,related contributions, resulting from the exercise of stock options under these plans. OnceWhen the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer holdsexecutive directors hold a number of shares (directly or through collective investment funds invested in Company stock) corresponding to more than five times his current gross annual fixed compensation, this holding requirement will be reduced to 10%. If in the future this ratio is no longer met, the previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply.

As of 2011, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer receives performance share grants, the final awarding of which is subject to a presence condition and performance conditions.

On the September 14, 2011 grant of TOTAL performance shares, the Board of Directors decided that the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will have to hold for as long as he remains in office, 50% of the capital gains, net of tax and other deductions, from shares granted under performance share grant plans. Once the Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer holds a number of shares (directly or through collective investment funds invested in Company stock) corresponding to more than five times his gross annual fixed compensation at that time, this holding requirement will be reduced to 10%. If in the future this ratiocondition is no longer met, the previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply.

In light of this holding requirement, the acquisition of the performance shares is not subject to an additional purchase of the Company’s shares.

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has given a commitmentundertaken not to hedge the price riskshares of the Company and any financial instruments related to them. This provision is now included in the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors.

All the options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and outstanding at December 31, 2013 represented 0.047%(1) of the potential share capital of the Company on the TOTAL stock options and shares he has been granted to date, and on the shares he holds.that date.

i. 2011 share subscription option plan: Thethe Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is satisfied,met, the number of options finallydefinitively granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

 

o

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the final number of options finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group. The average ROACE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

2010 share subscription option plan: The Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is satisfied, the number of options finally granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of

options finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculatedGroup, as published by the Group based on TOTAL’saccording to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 20102011 and 2011.2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies on a straight-line basislinearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group calculated based on TOTAL’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

o

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the final number of options granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

2009ii. 2010 share subscription option plan: Thethe Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is satisfied,met, the number of options finally granted to the Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by TOTAL. The average ROE is calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of options granted is related to the average ROACE of the Group as published by TOTAL. The average ROACE is calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

The acquisition rate applicable to the subscription options that were subject to the performance condition of the 2009 Plan was 100%.

2011 performance share plan:The Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is satisfied, the number of shares finallydefinitively granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

 

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies on a straight-line basis
o

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the final number of options granted is based on the average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group. The average ROACE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was not awarded any performance shares as part of the plans in the period 2006 to 2010.

Grants to employees

Share subscription option plans

2011 share subscription option plan: The Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is satisfied, for each grantee other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the options will be finally granted to the beneficiary provided that the performance condition is fulfilled. The performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average of the ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

2010 share subscription option plan: The Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group was satisfied:

for each grantee of up to 3,000 options, other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the options will be finally granted;

for each grantee of more than 3,000 options and less than or equal to 50,000 options (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer):

the first 3,000 options and two-thirds of the options in excess of this number will be finally granted to their beneficiary;

o 

the outstanding options, that is one-thirdFor 50% of the share subscription options in excess of the first 3,000 options, will be granted, provided that the performance condition described belowstates that the final number of options granted is fulfilled;based on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

for each grantee of more than 50,000 options, other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer:

the first 3,000 options, two-thirds of the options above the first 3,000 options and below the first 50,000 options, and one-third of the options in excess of the first 50,000 options, will be finally granted to their beneficiary;

the remaining options, that is one-third of the options above the first 3,000 options and below the first 50,000 options, and two-thirds of the options in excess of the first 50,000 options, will be finally granted provided that the performance condition is fulfilled.

This condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group based on TOTAL’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

2009 share subscription option plan:The Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group was met, for each beneficiary, other than the Chief Executive Officer, of more than 25,000 options, one-third of the options granted in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to a performance condition. This condition is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by TOTAL. The average ROE is calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

The acquisition rate applicable to the subscription options that were subject to the performance condition of the 2009 Plan was 100%.

Performance share plans

2011 performance share plan: The Board of Directors decided that, provided that the presence condition within the Group is satisfied, for executives officers(1) other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the number of shares finally granted will be subject to the performance condition set out below. This condition is based on the average ROE as published by the Group and calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

 

 

 

(1)

Executive officers, excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, are employees other than directors.Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares.

Furthermore, the Board of Directors decided that, for each beneficiary (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to a performance condition. This condition is based on the average ROE as published by the Group and calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

2010 performance share plan: The Board of Directors decided that, provided that the presence condition within the Group is satisfied, for each beneficiary of more than 100 shares, half of the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to a performance condition. This condition is based on the average ROE calculated by the Group based on TOTAL’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

2009 performance share plan: The Board of Directors decided that, provided that the presence condition within the Group is satisfied, for each beneficiary of more than 100 shares, half of the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to a performance condition. This condition is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by TOTAL. The average ROE is calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

Due to the application of the performance condition, the acquisition rate was 100% for the 2009 Plan.

In addition, the Board of Directors decided at its meeting of May 21, 2010 to implement a global free share plan intended for the Group’s employees, that is more than 100,000 employees. On June 30, 2010, rights to twenty-five free shares were granted to every employee. The shares are subject to a vesting period of two to four years depending on the case. The shares granted are not subject to any performance condition. They will be issued at the end of the vesting period.

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION, STOCK OPTIONS AND PERFORMANCE SHARES AWARDED TO THE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

For the year ended ()  2011   2010 

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (since May 21, 2010)

    

Compensation due for fiscal year as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(a)

   3,030,000     3,008,122  

In-kind benefits(b)

   6,991     6,908  

Value of options awarded(c)

   702,400     1,387,200  

Value of performance shares awarded(d)

   437,440       

Total

   4,176,831     4,402,230  

 

(a)Compensation detailed in the following table. For the 2010 fiscal year, Mr. de Margerie received compensation of1,030,359 as Chief Executive Officer for the period from January 1 to May 21, 2010, and compensation of1,977,763 as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the period from May 22 to December 31, 2010.
108TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013
(b)Mr. de Margerie has the use of a company car; he receives the health coverage provided for Group employees and is eligible for the life insurance plan open to the Group’s executive officers (see “— Pensions and other commitments”).
(c)Options awarded in 2011 are detailed in the table “Stock options awarded in 2011 to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer”. The value of options awarded was calculated on the day when they were awarded using the Black-Scholes model based on the assumptions used for the consolidated accounts (see Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(d)The value of performance shares was calculated on the day when they were awarded.


Item 6 - Compensation

CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMPENSATION

 

    For the year ended 2011   For the year ended 2010 
For the year ended ()  Amount due  Amount paid(a)   Amount due  Amount paid(a) 

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (since May 21, 2010)

      

Fixed compensation

   1,500,000    1,500,000     1,426,452(b)   1,426,452(b) 

Variable compensation(c)

   1,530,000    1,581 670     1,581,670(d)   1,356,991  

Extraordinary compensation

                  

Directors’ fees

                  

In-kind benefits(e)

   6,991    6,991     6,908    6,908  

Total

   3,036,991    3,088,661     3,015,030    2,790,351  

(a)Variable portion paid for prior fiscal year. For more detailed information about these criteria, see “— Compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer”.
(b)Includes a fixed portion of507,097 for the period between January 1 and May 21, 2010 and919,355 for the period between May 22 and December 31, 2010.
(c)The variable portion for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is calculated by taking into account the Group’s return on equity during the relevant fiscal year, the Group’s earnings compared to those of the other major international oil companies that are its competitors as well as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution based on operational target criteria. The variable portion can reach a maximum amount of 165% of the fixed base salary. The objectives related to personal contribution were considered to have been substantially fulfilled.
(d)Including a variable portion of523,262 for the period between January 1 to May 21 2010, and1,058,408 for the period between May 22 and December 31, 2010.
(e)Mr. de Margerie has the use of a company car, receives the health coverage provided for Group employees and is eligible for the life insurance plan open to the Group’s executive officers (see “— Pensions and other commitments”).

DIRECTORS’ FEES AND OTHER COMPENSATION RECEIVED BY DIRECTORS

Total compensation (including in-kind benefits) paid to each director in the year indicated (Article L. 225-102-1 of the French Commercial Code, 1st and 2nd paragraphs):

Gross amount ()  2011  2010 

Christophe de Margerie(a)

   (b)   (b) 

Thierry Desmarest (a)(b)

   639,854(d)   1,604,039(d) 

Patrick Artus(c)

   65,500    55,000  

Patricia Barbizet(a)

   115,500    107,000  

Daniel Bouton

   63,500    55,000  

Gunnar Brock(a)(e)

   75,500    39,328  

Claude Clément(e)

   156,365(f)   127,929(f) 

Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette(g)

   48,460      

Bertrand Collomb

   72,500    71,000  

Paul Desmarais Jr.

   51,000    45,000  

Bertrand Jacquillat(h)

   55,040    95,000  

Barbara Kux(a)(i)

   26,770      

Anne Lauvergeon(a)

   63,500    45,000  

Peter Levene of Portsoken(j)

   19,230    79,000  

Claude Mandil(a)

   63,500    55,000  

Michel Pébereau

   77,500    71,000  

Thierry de Rudder(a)

   138,500    142,000  

(a)Member of the Strategic Committee.
(b)For the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, see the summary compensation tables “Summary of compensation, stock options and performance shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer” and “Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation”. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer did not receive any directors’ fees.
(c)Member of the Compensation Committee since May 21, 2010.
(d)Including for 2011, fees received (77,500) and pension benefits received (562,354), and including for 2010, fees received (39,328), fixed and variable compensation for his role as Chairman of the Board of Directors up to May 21, 2010 (751,407), the retirement benefit (492,963) and pension benefits received (320,341).
(e)Director since May 21, 2010.
(f)Including for 2011, the directors’ fees received, representing58,500, as well as the compensation received from Total Raffinage Marketing (a subsidiaryiii. Follow up table of TOTAL S.A.), representing97,865 and including for 2010, directors’ fees received, representing32,328 as well as the compensation received from Total Raffinage Marketing, representing95,601.
(g)Director and member of the Audit Committee from May 13, 2011.
(h)Director and member of the Audit Committee until May 13, 2011.
(i)Director since May 13, 2011.
(j)Director until May 13, 2011.

Over the past two years, the directors currently in office have not received any compensation or in-kind benefits from companies controlled by TOTAL S.A., except for Mr. Clément, who is an employee of Total Raffinage Marketing, and Mr. Desmarest, Chairman of the Board of Directors until May 21, 2010. The compensation indicated in the table above (except for that of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Messrs. Desmarest and Clément) consists solely of directors’ fees (gross amount) paid during the relevant period. None of the directors have service contracts linking them to TOTAL S.A. or any of its subsidiaries that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.

STOCK OPTIONS AWARDED IN 2011 TO THE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

The stock options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are detailed in the table “TOTAL stock options awarded to Mr. de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL S.A.” below., outstanding in 2013:

 

   Date of
Plan
  Type of
options
 Value of
options
()
(a)
  Number of
options
awarded
during
fiscal  year
(b)
  Exercise
price
  Exercise
period
  Performance
condition
Christophe de Margerie  

 

2011 Plan

09/14/2011

  

  

 Subscription
options
  702,400    160,000    33.00    
 
09/15/2013-
09/14/2019 
  
  
 

For 50% of the options, the condition is based on the average ROE for the Group’s 2011 and 2012 fiscal years. For 50% of the options, the condition is based on the average ROACE for the Group’s 2011 and 2012 fiscal years.

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                

Total

        702,400    160,000            
   2005 Plan  2006 Plan  2007 Plan  2008 Plan  2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  Total 
Type of options Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
     

Expiry date

  07/19/2013    07/18/2014    07/17/2015    10/09/2016    09/15/2017    09/14/2018    09/14/2019   

Exercise price ()(a)

  49.04    50.60    60.10    42.90    39.90    38.20    33.00      

Options awarded by the Board(b)

  130,000    160,000    200,000    200,000    200,000    240,000    160,000   

 

1,290,000

  

Adjustments related to the spin-off of Arkema(c)

  1,828                            1,828  

Outstanding options as of January 1, 2013

  131,828    160,000    200,000    176,667    200,000    240,000    160,000    1,268,495  

Options awarded in 2013

                                

Options exercised in 2013

                                

Options canceled in 2013

  (131,828                          (131,828

Options outstanding as of December 31, 2013

      160,000    200,000    176,667    200,000    240,000    160,000    1,136,667  

 

(a)The value of options awarded was calculated on the day they were awarded using the Black-Scholes model based on the assumptions used for the consolidated accounts (see Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(b)As part of the share subscription option plan awarded on September 14, 2011, the Board of Directors decided that, for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the number of share subscription options that are likely to be exercised at the end of the two-year vesting period will be subject to performance conditions being met (see “— Grants to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer”).

STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISED IN 2011 BY THE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

The stock options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are detailed in the table “TOTAL stock options awarded to Mr. de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL S.A.” below.

    Date of Plan  Number of options
exercised during
fiscal year
   Exercise
price ()
 

Christophe de Margerie

  2003 Plan   113,576     32.84  

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  07/16/2003          

Total

      113,576       

PERFORMANCE SHARES AWARDED IN 2011 TO THE CHAIRMAN AND

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR ANY DIRECTOR

    Date of
Plan
   Number of
shares
awarded
during
fiscal year
   Value of
shares ()
(a)
   Acquisition
date
   Availability
date
   

Performance

condition

Christophe de MargerieChairman and Chief Executive Officer   
 
2011 Plan
09/14/2011
  
  
   16,000     437,440     09/15/2013     09/15/2015    For 50% of the shares, the condition is based on the average ROE for the Group’s 2011 and 2012 fiscal years. For 50% of the shares, the condition is based on the average ROACE for the Group’s 2011 and 2012 fiscal years.
Claude ClémentDirector representing employee shareholders   
 
2011 Plan
09/14/2011
  
  
   240     6,562     09/15/2013     09/15/2015    Shares in excess of the first 100 shares are subject to a condition based on the average ROE for the Group’s 2011 and 2012 fiscal years.
Total        16,240                    

(a)The value of performance shares was calculated on the day when they were awarded.

PERFORMANCE SHARES FINALLY AWARDED IN 2011 FOR THE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR ANY DIRECTOR

Date of Plan

Number of shares

finally awarded during
fiscal year

Acquisition
condition

Christophe de Margerie

2009 Plan

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

09/15/2009

Claude Clément

2009 Plan

Director representing employee shareholders

09/15/2009

Total

TOTAL STOCK OPTION GRANTS

The following table gives a breakdown of stock options awarded by category of beneficiaries (main executive officers, other executive officers and other employees) for the plans in effect during 2011.

      Number of
beneficiaries
  Number
of options
awarded
(a)
  Percentage  Average
number of
options per
beneficiary
(a)
 

2003 Plan(b)(d):: Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  28    356,500    12.2  12,732  

Decision of the Board on July 16, 2003

 Other executive officers  319    749,206    25.5  2,349  

Exercise price:133.20; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees  3,603    1,829,600    62.3  508  

Exercise price as of May 24, 2006:32.84(a)

 Total  3,950    2,935,306    100  743  

2004 Plan(d): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  30    423,500    12.6  14,117  

Decision of the Board on July 20, 2004

 Other executive officers  319    902,400    26.8  2,829  

Exercise price:159.40; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees  3,997    2,039,730    60.6  510  

Exercise price as of May 24, 2006:39.30(a)

 Total  4,346    3,365,630    100  774  

2005 Plan(d): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  30    370,040    24.3  12,335  

Decision of the Board on July 19, 2005

 Other executive officers  330    574,140    37.6  1,740  

Exercise price:198.90; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees  2,361    581,940    38.1  246  

Exercise price as of May 24, 2006:49.04(a)

 Total  2,721    1,526,120    100  561  

2006 Plan(d): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  28    1,447,000    25.3  51,679  

Decision of the Board on July 18, 2006

 Other executive officers  304    2,120,640    37.0  6,976  

Exercise price:50.60; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees  2,253    2,159,600    37.7  959  
 Total  2,585    5,727,240    100  2,216  

2007 Plan(d)(e): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  27    1,329,360    22.8  49,236  

Decision of the Board on July 17, 2007

 Other executive officers  298    2,162,270    37.1  7,256  

Exercise price:60.10; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees  2,401    2,335,600    40.1  973  
 Total  2,726    5,827,230    100  2,138  

2008 Plan(d)(e)(f): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  26    1,227,500    27.6  47,212  
Awarded on October 9, 2008, by decision of the Board of Directors on September 9, 2008 

Other executive officers

Other employees

  

 

298

1,690

  

  

  

 

1,988,420

1,233,890

  

  

  

 

44.7

27.7


  

 

6,673

730

  

  

Exercise price:42.90; discount: 0.0%

 Total  2,014    4,449,810    100  2,209  

2009 Plan(d)(e)(g): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  26    1,201,500    27.4  46,212  

Decision of the Board on September 15, 2009

 Other executive officers  284    1,825,540    41.6  6,428  

Exercise price:39.90; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees  1,742    1,360,460    31.0  781  
 Total  2,052    4,387,500    100  2,138  

2010 Plan(d)(e): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  25    1,348,100    28.2  53,924  

Decision of the Board on September 14, 2010

 Other executive officers  282    2,047,600    42.8  7,261  

Exercise price:38.20; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees  1,790    1,392,720    29.0  778  
 Total  2,097    4,788,420    100  2,283  

2011 Plan(d)(e): Subscription options

 Main executive officers(c)  29    846,600    55.7  29,193  

Decision of the Board on September 14, 2011

 Other executive officers  177    672,240    44.3  3,798  

Exercise price:33.00; discount: 0.0%

 Other employees                
 Total  206    1,518,840    100  7,373  

(a)To take into account the spin-off of Arkema, pursuant to the provisions in effect on the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, at its meeting of March 14, 2006, the Board of Directors resolved to adjust the rights of TOTAL stock options holders. For each plan and each holder, the exercise prices for TOTAL stock options were multiplied by 0.986147 and the number of unexercised stock options was multiplied by 1.014048 (and then rounded up), effective as of May 24, 2006. In addition, to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, the exercise price for stock options was divided by four and the number of unexercised stock options was multiplied by four. The presentation in this table of the number of options initially awarded has not been adjusted to reflect the four-for-one stock split.
(b)Certain employees of the Elf Aquitaine group in 1998 also benefited from the vesting of Elf Aquitaine options awarded in 1998 subject to performance conditions related to the Elf Aquitaine group from 1998 to 2002. These Elf Aquitaine plans expired on March 31, 2005.
(c)Members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer as of the date of the Board meeting awarding the options. Mr. Desmarest has not been a member of the Management Committee since February 14, 2007. Mr. Desmarest was awarded 110,000 options under the 2007 Plan and no options since 2008.
(d)The options are exercisable, subject to a presence condition, after a 2-year vesting period from the date of the Board meeting awarding the options and expire eight years after this date. The underlying shares may not be transferred during the 4-year period from the date of the Board meeting awarding the options (except for the 2008 Plan). The presence condition states that the termination of the employment contract will result in the employee losing the right to exercise the options.
(e)The 4-year transfer restriction period does not apply to employees of non-French subsidiaries as of the date of the grant, who may transfer the underlying shares after a 2-year period from the date of the grant.
(f)For the 2008 Plan, the options acquisition rate, linked to the performance condition, was 60%.
(g)For the 2009 Plan, the options acquisition rate, linked to the performance condition, was 100%.

TOTAL STOCK OPTIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011

   2003 Plan  2004 Plan  2005 Plan  2006 Plan  2007 Plan  2008 Plan  2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  Total 
Type of options Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
     

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

  05/17/2001    05/14/2004    05/14/2004    05/14/2004    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/21/2010    05/21/2010   

Grant date(a)

  07/16/2003    07/20/2004    07/19/2005    07/18/2006    07/17/2007    10/09/2008    09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011      

Total number of options awarded, including(b):

  11,741,224    13,462,520    6,104,480    5,727,240    5,937,230    4,449,810    4,387,500    4,788,420    1,518,840    58,117,264  

Directors(c)

  240,000    240,000    240,720    400,720    310,840    200,660    200,000    240,000    160,000    2,232,940  

 C. de Margerie

  n/a    n/a    n/a    160,000    200,000    200,000    200,000    240,000    160,000    1,160,000  

 C. Clément

  n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a              

 D. Boeuf

  n/a        720    720    840    660        n/a    n/a    2,940  

 T. Desmarest

  240,000    240,000    240,000    240,000    110,000                n/a    1,070,000  

Additional grant

      24,000    134,400                            158,400  

Adjustments related to the spin-off of Arkema(d)

  163,180    196,448    90,280                            449,908  

Date as of which the options may be exercised

  07/17/2005    07/21/2006    07/20/2007    07/19/2008    07/18/2009    10/10/2010    09/16/2011    09/15/2012    09/15/2013   

Expiry date

  07/16/2011    07/20/2012    07/19/2013    07/18/2014    07/17/2015    10/09/2016    09/15/2017    09/14/2018    09/14/2019   

Exercise price ()(e)

  32.84    39.30    49.04    50.60    60.10    42.90    39.90    38.20    33.00      

Cumulative number of options exercised as of December 31, 2011

  11,068,508    1,266,293    38,497    8,620        200    1,080    2,040    9,400   

Cumulative number of options canceled as of December 31, 2011

  835,896    322,151    128,127    95,114    86,865    113,912    28,740    86,337    1,000      

Number of options:

          

 outstanding as of January 1, 2011

  5,734,444    12,338,847    6,178,856    5,640,886    5,866,445    4,349,158    4,371,890    4,787,300        49,267,826  

 awarded in 2011

                                  1,518,840    1,518,840  

 canceled in 2011(f)(g)

  (738,534  (28,208  (16,320  (17,380  (16,080  (13,260  (14,090  (85,217  (1,000  (930,089

 exercised in 2011

  (4,995,910  (216,115              (200      (2,040  (9,400  (5,223,665

 outstanding as of December 31, 2011

      12,094,524    6,162,536    5,623,506    5,850,365    4,335,698    4,357,800    4,700,043    1,508,440    44,632,912  

(a)The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the options, except for the share subscription option plan of October 9, 2008, approved by the Board on September 9, 2008.
(b)The number of options awarded before May 23, 2006, has been multiplied by four to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006.
(c)Options awarded to directors at the time of grant.
(d)Adjustments approved by the Board at its meeting on March 14, 2006, pursuant to the provisions in effect at the time of the Board meeting and at the time of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, related to the spin-off of Arkema. These adjustments were made on May 22, 2006 effective as of May 24, 2006.
(e)Exercise price as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices of TOTAL subscription sharesstock options under the plans in force aton that date were multiplied by 0.25 to take into account the four-for-one stock split on May 18, 2006. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL stock options under these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices effective before May 24, 2006 are given in Note 25, pointspoint A B and C to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(f)(b)Out of the 930,089 options canceled in 2011, 738,534 options that were not exercised expired due to the expiry of the 2003 subscription option plan on July 16, 2011.
(g)The acquisition rate applicable to the subscription options that were subject to the performance condition of the 2009 Plan was 100%.

If all the outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2011 were exercised, the corresponding shares would represent 1.85%(1)of the Company’s potential share capital as of such date.

(1)Out of a total potential share capital of 2,408,400,225 shares.

TOTAL STOCK OPTIONS AWARDED TO MAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND TREASURER) AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011

   2003 Plan  2004 Plan  2005 Plan  2006 Plan  2007 Plan  2008 Plan  2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  Total 
Type of options Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
     

Expiry date

  07/16/2011    07/20/2012    07/19/2013    07/18/2014    07/17/2015    10/09/2016    09/15/2017    09/14/2018    09/14/2019   

Exercise price ()(a)

  32.84    39.30    49.04    50.60    60.10    42.90    39.90    38.20    33.00      

Options awarded by the Board(b)

  680,904    848,800    711,440    851,240    1,032,120    1,138,300    1,215,300    1,406,400    846,600    8,731,104  

Adjustments related to the spin-off of Arkema(c)

  8,988    11,992    10,048                            31,028  

Options outstanding as of January 01, 2011

  277,119    757,792    721,488    851,240    1,032,120    1,059,901    1,215,300    1,406,400     7,321,360  

Options awarded in 2011

                                  846,600    846,600  

Options exercised in 2011

  (277,119                                  (277,119) 

Options canceled in 2011

                              (59,000      (59,000) 

Options outstanding as of December 31, 2011

      757,792    721,488    851,240    1,032,120    1,059,901    1,215,300    1,347,400    846,600    7,831,841  

(a)Exercise price as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices of TOTAL subscription shares under the plans in force at that date were multiplied by 0.25 to take into account the four-for-one stock split on May 18, 2006. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL stock options under these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices effective before May 24, 2006 are given in Note 25, points A, B and C to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b)The number of options awardedgranted on or before May 23, 2006 has beenwas multiplied by four to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006.

(c)

Adjustments approved by the Board at its meeting on March 14, 2006 pursuant to the provisions in effect at the time of the Board meeting and of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006 related to the spin-off of Arkema. These adjustments were made on May 22, 2006, effective as of May 24, 2006.

Asiv. Stock options exercised in 2013 by each executive director (AMF Table No. 5):

Plan date
and No.
Nature of options
exercised during
fiscal year
Exercise price

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Grant of performance shares

Since 2011, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has been awarded performance shares as part of the broader share grant plans approved by the Board of Directors for certain Group employees. Subject to certain specific provisions set out below, performance shares granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are governed by the same provisions that apply to other beneficiaries of grant plans.

In case of a definitive grant to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of all the performance shares outstanding at December 31, 2013, these shares would represent 0.0044%(1) of the potential share capital of the Company on that date.

As of 2011, the Board of Directors has made the definitive grant of performance shares to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer contingent upon specific presence and performance conditions as described below. As of 2013, these performance conditions are assessed over a 3-year vesting period.

For performance share grant plans awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors decided that the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be required to hold in registered form, for as long as he remains in office, 50% of the capital gains, net of tax and contributions related to the shares granted under such plans. When the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer holds a number of shares (directly or through collective investment funds invested in Company stock) corresponding to five times his gross annual fixed compensation at that time, this holding requirement will be equal to 10%. If in the future this condition is no longer met, the previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply.

Given this holding requirement and given the share holding requirements that the Board of Directors impose on the executive directors, the Board of Directors decided not to make the grant of performance shares contingent upon the purchase of a quantity of shares once the awarded shares become transferable, thus disregarding one of the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF Code to which the Company adheres.

(1)

Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.109


Item 6 - Compensation

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has undertaken not to hedge the shares of the Company and any financial instruments related to them. This provision is now included in the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors.

i. 2013 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, the number of shares definitively granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

o

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and less than 16%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.

o

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

ii. 2012 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, the number of shares definitively granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

o

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%,

varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and less than 16%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.

o

For 50% of the share granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

iii. 2011 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, the number of shares definitively granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

o

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

o

For 50% of the share granted, the performance condition states that the final number of shares granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was not awarded any performance shares under the 2006 to 2010 plans.

iv. Follow up table of TOTAL performance shares awarded to Mr. de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL S.A.:

    2011 Plan   2012 Plan   2013 Plan   Total 

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

   05/13/2011     05/13/2011     05/13/2011    

Grant date

   09/14/2011     07/26/2012     07/25/2013    

Closing price on grant date

   32.690     36.120     40.005    

Average repurchase price per share paid by the Company

   39.580     38.810     40.560    

Shares awarded by the Board

   16,000     53,000     53,000     122,000  

Start of the vesting period

   09/14/2011     07/26/2012     07/25/2013    

Definitive grant date, subject to the conditions set out (end of the vesting period)

   09/15/2013     07/27/2014     07/26/2016    

Availability date (end of the mandatory holding period)

   09/15/2015     07/27/2016     07/26/2018    

Definitively granted in 2013

   16,000               16,000  

110TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Compensation

v. Performance shares awarded to each executive and non executive director in 2013 by the issuer and by any Group company (AMF Table No. 6):

   Plan date
and No.
  Number of
shares
awarded
during fiscal
year
  Valuation of
shares ()(a)
  Acquisition
date
  Availability
date
  Performance
conditions

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief

Executive Officer

  
 
2013 Plan
07/25/2013
  
  
  53,000    1,729,920    07/26/2016    07/26/2018   For 50% of the shares, the condition is based on the Group’s average ROE in 2013, 2014 and 2015. For 50% of the shares, the condition is based on the Group’s average ROACE in 2013, 2014 and 2015.

Charles Keller

Director representing

employee shareholders

since May 17, 2013

  
 
2013 Plan
07/25/2013
  
  
  400    13,056    07/26/2016    07/26/2018   Shares in excess of the first 100 shares are subject to a condition based on the Group’s average ROE in 2013, 2014 and 2015.

Claude Clément

Director representing

employee shareholders

until May 17, 2013

                     

Total

      53,400    1,742,976            

(a)

The valuation of performance shares was calculated on the day they were awarded, according to the method used for the Consolidated Financial Statements.

vi. Performance shares that have become available for each executive and non executive director (AMF Table No. 7):

Plan date and No.Number of shares that
have become available
during the fiscal year
Vesting conditions

Christophe de Margerie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Charles Keller

Director representing employee

shareholders since May 17, 2013


2009 Plan

09/15/2009


150n/a

Claude Clément

Director representing employee

shareholders until May 17, 2013

n/a

Total

150

Grants to employees

Share subscription option plan

In 2013, as in 2012, the Board of Directors decided not to award any stock options.

i. 2011 share subscription option plan: the Board of Directors decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, for each beneficiary other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, options will be subject to a performance condition based on the Group’s average ROE, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.

The acquisition rate:

¡

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

¡

varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and

¡

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 18%.

The acquisition rate applicable to the subscription options subject to the performance condition under the 2011 plan was 100%.

Performance share plan

ii. 2013 performance share plan:the Board of Directors decided that for executive officers(1) (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the definitive award of all shares granted is contingent upon a presence condition and a performance condition. The performance condition states that the number of shares definitively awarded is based on the

(1)

The executive officers (aside from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) are employees who are not directors.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.111


Item 6 - Compensation

Group’s average ROE as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015.

The acquisition rate:

¡

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;

¡

varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and

¡

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.

The Board of Directors also decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, for each beneficiary (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of that number will be definitively granted subject to the above performance condition being met.

iii. 2012 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided that for executive officers (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the definitive award of all shares granted is contingent upon a presence condition and a performance condition. The performance condition states that the number of shares definitively awarded is based on the Group’s average ROE, as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013.

The acquisition rate:

¡

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;

¡

varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and

¡

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.

The Board of Directors also decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, for each beneficiary (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of that number will be definitively granted subject to the above performance condition being met.

iv. 2011 performance share plan:the Board of Directors decided that for executive officers (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the definitive award of all shares granted is contingent upon a presence condition and a performance condition. The performance condition states that the number of shares definitively awarded is based on the Group’s average ROE as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.

The acquisition rate:

¡

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

¡

varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and

¡

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 18%.

The Board of Directors also decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, for each beneficiary (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of that number will be definitively granted subject to the above performance condition being met.

The acquisition rate applicable to the shares subject to the performance condition under the 2011 plan was 100%.

112TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Compensation

Follow up of TOTAL stock option plans as of December 31, 2013

Breakdown of TOTAL stock option grants by category of beneficiary

The following table gives a breakdown of TOTAL stock options awarded by category of beneficiary (main executive officers, other executive officers and other employees) for each of the plans in effect during 2013 (for more information concerning the TOTAL stock option plans, see Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements):

      Number of
beneficiaries
  Number
of  notified
options
(a)
  Percentage  

Average

number of
options per
beneficiary
(a)

 
2005 Plan: Subscription options Main executive officers(b)  30    370,040    24.3  12,335  
Decision of the Board on July 19, 2005 Other executive officers  330    574,140    37.6  1,740  
Exercise price:198.90; discount: 0.0% Other employees  2,361    581,940    38.1  246  
Exercise price as of May 24, 2006:49.04(a) Total  2,721    1,526,120    100  561  
2006 Plan: Subscription options Main executive officers(b)  28    1,447,000    25.3  51,679  
Decision of the Board on July 18, 2006 Other executive officers  304    2,120,640    37.0  6,976  
Exercise price:50.60; discount: 0.0% Other employees  2,253    2,159,600    37.7  959  
 Total  2,585    5,727,240    100  2,216  
2007 Plan: Subscription options Main executive officers(b)  27    1,329,360    22.8  49,236  
Decision of the Board on July 17, 2007 Other executive officers  298    2,162,270    37.1  7,256  
Exercise price:60.10; discount: 0.0% Other employees  2,401    2,335,600    40.1  973  
 Total  2,726    5,827,230    100  2,138  
2008 Plan(c): Subscription options Main executive officers(b)  26    1,227,500    27.6  47,212  
Awarded on October 9, 2008, by decision of Other executive officers  298    1,988,420    44.7  6,673  
the Board of Directors on September 9, 2008 Other employees  1,690    1,233,890    27.7  730  
Exercise price:42.90; discount: 0.0% Total  2,014    4,449,810    100  2,209  
2009 Plan(c): Subscription options Main executive officers(b)  26    1,201,500    27.4  46,212  
Decision of the Board on September 15, 2009 Other executive officers  284    1,825,540    41.6  6,428  
Exercise price:39.90; discount: 0.0% Other employees  1,742    1,360,460    31.0  781  
 Total  2,052    4,387,500    100  2,138  
2010 Plan(c): Subscription options Main executive officers(b)  25    1,348,100    28.2  53,924  
Decision of the Board on September 14, 2010 Other executive officers  282    2,047,600    42.8  7,261  
Exercise price:38.20; discount: 0.0% Other employees  1,790    1,392,720    29.0  778  
 Total  2,097    4,788,420    100  2,283  
2011 Plan(c): Subscription options Main executive officers(b)  29    846,600    55.7  29,193  
Decision of the Board on September 14, 2011 Other executive officers  177    672,240    44.3  3,798  
Exercise price:33.00; discount: 0.0% Other employees                
  Total  206    1,518,840    100  7,373  

(a)

To take into account the spin-off of Arkema, pursuant to the provisions in effect on the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, at its meeting of March 14, 2006 the Board of Directors resolved to adjust the rights of TOTAL stock options holders. For each plan and each beneficiary, the exercise prices for TOTAL stock options were multiplied by an adjustment factor of 0.986147 and the number of unexercised stock options was multiplied by an adjustment factor of 1.014048 (and then rounded up), effective as of May 24, 2006. In addition, to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, the number of options awarded before May 23, 2006 was multiplied by four and the exercise price of these options was multiplied by 0.25. The presentation in this table of the number of notified options has not been adjusted to reflect the four-for-one stock split.

(b)

Members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer as of the date of the Board meeting awarding the options. Mr. Desmarest has not been a member of the Management Committee since February 14, 2007. Mr. Desmarest was awarded 110,000 options under the 2007 plan and no options since 2008.

(c)

The acquisition rate of performance condition-related shares was 60% for the 2008 plan and 100% for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 plans.

For the 2007, 2008 and 2009 share subscription option plans, the Board of Directors decided that for each beneficiary of more than 25,000 options, one-third of the options awarded in excess of thisthat number should be subject to a performance condition.

For the 2010 share subscription option plan, a portion of the options granted to beneficiaries of more than 3,000 options are subject to a performance condition for part of the options (see “— Grants to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer”).condition. For the 2011 share subscription option plan, all of the options are subject to a performance condition.

In addition, Mr. Clément,2013, as in 2012, the director representing employee shareholders, hasBoard of Directors decided not exercisedto award any option in 2011 and has not been awarded any sharestock options.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.113


Item 6 - Compensation

Historic overview of outstanding TOTAL stock option plans

Past awards of subscription or purchase options under— Information on the 2011 Plan.

TOTAL STOCK OPTIONS AWARDED TO MR. DE MARGERIE, CHAIRMAN AND

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TOTAL S.A.subscription or purchase options (AMF Table No. 8):

 

   2003 Plan  2004 Plan  2005 Plan  2006 Plan  2007 Plan  2008 Plan  2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  Total 
Type of options Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
     

Expiry date

  07/16/2011    07/20/2012    07/19/2013    07/18/2014    07/17/2015    10/09/2016    09/15/2017    09/14/2018    09/14/2019   

Exercise price ()(a)

  32.84    39.30    49.04    50.60    60.10    42.90    39.90    38.20    33.00      

Options awarded by the Board(b)

  112,000    128,000    130,000    160,000    200,000    200,000    200,000    240,000    160,000    1,530,000  

Adjustments related to the spin-off of Arkema(c)

  1,576    1,800    1,828                            5,204  

Options outstanding as of January 01, 2011

  113,576    129,800    131,828    160,000    200,000    176,667    200,000    240,000        1,351,871  

Options awarded in 2011

                                  160,000    160,000  

Options exercised in 2011

  (113,576                                  (113,576

Options canceled in 2011

                                        

Options outstanding as of December 31, 2011

      129,800    131,828    160,000    200,000    176,667    200,000    240,000    160,000    1,398,295  
   2005 Plan  2006 Plan  2007 Plan  2008 Plan  2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  Total 
Type of options Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
  Subscription
options
     

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

  05/14/2004    05/14/2004    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/21/2010    05/21/2010   

Date of Board meeting / grant date(a)

  07/19/2005    07/18/2006    07/17/2007    10/09/2008    09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011      

Total number of options awarded by the Board, including(b):

  6,104,480    5,727,240    5,937,230    4,449,810    4,387,620    4,788,420    1,518,840    32,913,640  

Executive and non executive directors(c)

  240,000    400,000    310,000    200,000    200,000    240,000    160,000    1,750,000  

 C. de Margerie

  n/a    160,000    200,000    200,000    200,000    240,000    160,000    1,160,000  

 C. Keller

  n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a      

 C. Clément

  n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a              

 T. Desmarest

  240,000    240,000    110,000                    590,000  

Additional grants

  134,400                            134,400  

Adjustments related to the spin-off of Arkema(d)

  90,280                            90,280  

Date as of which the options may be exercised

  07/20/2007    07/19/2008    07/18/2009    10/10/2010    09/16/2011    09/15/2012    09/15/2013   

Expiry date

  07/19/2013    07/18/2014    07/17/2015    10/09/2016    09/15/2017    09/14/2018    09/14/2019   

Exercise price (in)(e)

  49.04    50.60    60.10    42.90    39.90    38.20    33.00      

Cumulative number of options exercised as of December 31, 2013

  39,127    8,620        112,740    365,722    159,371    373,346    1,058,926  

Cumulative number of options canceled as of December 31, 2013

  6,290,033    97,994    89,265    117,872    32,520    91,197    4,400    6,723,281  

Number of options:

        

 outstanding as of January 1, 2013

  6,160,020    5,621,526    5,848,985    4,330,468    4,334,900    4,661,443    1,505,040    32,462,382  

 awarded in 2013

                                

 canceled in 2013(f)

  (6,159,390  (900  (1,020  (360  (1,080  (720      (6,163,470

 exercised in 2013

  (630          (110,910  (344,442  (122,871  (363,946  (942,799

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

      5,620,626    5,847,965    4,219,198    3,989,378    4,537,852    1,141,094    25,356,113  

 

(a)

The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the options, except for the share subscription option plan of October 9, 2008, approved by the Board on September 9, 2008.

(b)

To take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholder’s Meeting of May 12, 2006, the number of options awarded before May 23, 2006 has been multiplied by four.

(c)

List of executive and non executive directors who had this status during the fiscal year 2013.

(d)

To take into account the spin-off of Arkema, at its meeting of March 14, 2006 the Board of Directors resolved to adjust the rights of TOTAL stock options holders, pursuant to the provisions in effect on the date of its meeting and at the time of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006. These adjustments were made on May 22, 2006, effective as of May 24, 2006.

(e)

The exercise price is the average closing price of TOTAL’s share on Euronext Paris during the twenty trading days prior to the grant date, without any discount.

Exercise price as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices of TOTAL subscription shares under the plans in force at that date were multiplied by 0.25 toTo take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 18, 2006.12, 2006, the exercise prices of options granted before May 23, 2006 were multiplied by 0.25. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL stock options under these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices effectiveapplicable before May 24, 2006 are givenindicated in Note 25, pointspoint A B and C to the Consolidated Financial Statements (chapter 9).Statements.
(b)(f)

The number ofOf the 6,163,470 options awarded before May 23, 2006, has been multiplied by four to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meetingcanceled in 2013, 6,158,662 unexercised options expired on May 12, 2006.

(c)Adjustments approved by the Board at its meeting on March 14, 2006, pursuantJuly 19, 2013 due to the provisions in effect at the timeexpiration of the Board meeting and of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, related to the spin-off of Arkema. These adjustments were made on May 22, 2006 effective as of May 24, 2006.2005 subscription option plan.

As partIn the event of the 2007 to 2011 Plans, the Board has made the grant of theseexercise all share subscription options to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer subject to performance conditions (see “— Grants to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer”). For the 2009 Plan, the acquisition rate, linked to the performance conditions, was 100%.

Asoutstanding as of December 31, 2011,2013, the outstanding options of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer represented 0.058%corresponding shares would represent 1.05%(1) of the Company’s potential share capital as of suchon that date.

Mr. Desmarest, Chairman of the Board of Directors until May 21, 2010, was not awarded any share subscription options under the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 plans. In addition, he was not awarded any performance shares under plans in the period 2005 to 2011.

 

(1)

Out ofBased on a total potential share capital of 2,408,400,2252,403,907,748 shares.

114TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


STOCK OPTIONS AWARDED TO THE TEN EMPLOYEES (OTHER THAN CORPORATE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS) RECEIVING THE LARGEST AWARDS/STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISED BY THE TEN EMPLOYEES (OTHER THAN CORPORATE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS) EXERCISING THE LARGEST NUMBER OF OPTIONSItem 6 - Compensation

 

    Total number of
options
awarded/exercised
   Exercise price ()  Grant date(a)   Expiry date 

Options awarded in 2011 to the ten employees of TOTAL S.A., or any company in the Group, receiving the largest number of options

   430,400    33.00    09/14/2011     09/14/2019  

Options exercised in 2011 by the ten employees of TOTAL S.A., or any company in the Group, exercising the largest number of options(b)

   227,671     32.84    07/16/2003     07/16/2011  
   9,736     39.30    07/20/2004     07/20/2012  
   237,407     33.10(c)    

Stock options awarded to the ten employees (other than executive or non executive directors) receiving the largest number of options / Stock options exercised by the ten employees (other than executive or non executive directors) exercising the largest number of options (AMF Table No. 9)

   Total number of
options
awarded/exercised
  Average
weighted
exercise
price ()
  2008 Plan
10/09/2008
(a)
  2009 Plan
09/15/2009
  2010 Plan
09/14/2010
  2011 Plan
09/14/2011
 

Options awarded in 2013 by TOTAL S.A. and its affiliates(b) to the ten TOTAL S.A. employees (other than executive or non executive directors) receiving the largest number of options (aggregate — not individual information)

                        

Options held on TOTAL S.A. and its affiliates(b) and exercised in 2013 by the ten TOTAL S.A. employees (other than executive or non executive directors) with the largest number of options purchased or subscribed (aggregate — not individual information)

  248,142    35.43    18,600    45,200    20,500    163,842  

 

(a)

The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the options.options, except for the share subscription option plan of October 9, 2008, approved by the Board on September 9, 2008.

(b)

Exercise pricePursuant to the conditions of Article L. 225-180 of the French Commercial Code.

Follow up of TOTAL performance share grants as of May 24, 2006. The exercise pricesDecember 31, 2013

Breakdown of TOTAL stock options under the plans in force at that date were multipliedoption grants by 0.25 to take into account the four-for-one stock split on May 18, 2006. Moreover, following the spin-offcategory of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL stock options under these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices effective before May 24, 2006 are given in Note 25, points A, B and C to the Consolidated Financial Statements.beneficiary

(c)Weighted-average price.

TOTAL GLOBAL FREE AND PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANTS

TOTAL global free share plan

In addition to the performance shares granted, the Board of Directors decided at its meeting on May 21, 2010, to implement a global free share plan intended for all the Group employees, that is, more than 100,000 employees. On June 30, 2010, rights to twenty-five free shares were granted to every employee. The shares are subject to a vesting period of two to four years depending on the case. The shares granted are not subject to any performance condition. Following the vesting period, the shares will be issued.

Breakdown of TOTAL performance share grants

The following table gives a breakdown of TOTAL performance share grants by category of beneficiary (main executive officers, other executive officers and other employees).:

 

      Number of
beneficiaries
  Number
of shares
awarded
(a)
  Percentage  Average
number of
shares per
beneficiary
 

2005 Plan(b)

 Main executive officers(c)  29    13,692    2.4  472  

Decision of the Board on July 19, 2005

 Other executive officers  330    74,512    13.1  226  
 Other employees(d)  6,956    481,926    84.5  69  
 Total  7,315    570,130    100  78  

2006 Plan(b)

 Main executive officers(c)  26    49,200    2.2  1,892  

Decision of the Board on July 18, 2006

 Other executive officers  304    273,832    12.0  901  
 Other employees(d)  7,509    1,952,332    85.8  260  
 Total  7,839    2,275,364    100  290  

2007 Plan(b)

 Main executive officers(c)  26    48,928    2.1  1,882  

Decision of the Board on July 17, 2007

 Other executive officers  297    272,128    11.5  916  
 Other employees(d)  8,291    2,045,309    86.4  247  
 Total  8,614    2,366,365    100  275  

2008 Plan(b)

 Main executive officers(c)  25    49,100    1.8  1,964  
Awarded on October 9, 2008, by decision of the Board of Directors on September 9, 2008 Other executive officers  300    348,156    12.5  1,161  
 Other employees(d)  9,028    2,394,712    85.8  265  
 Total  9,353    2,791,968    100  299  

2009 Plan(b)

 Main executive officers(c)  25    48,700    1.6  1,948  

Decision of the Board on September 15, 2009

 Other executive officers  284    329,912    11.1  1,162  
 Other employees(d)  9,693    2,593,406    87.3  268  
 Total  10,002    2,972,018    100  297  

2010 Plan(e)

 Main executive officers(c)  24    46,780    1.6  1,949  

Decision of the Board on September 14, 2010

 Other executive officers  283    343,080    11.4  1,212  
 Other employees(d)  10,074    2,620,151    87.0  260  
 Total  10,381    3,010,011    100  290  

2011 Plan

 Main executive officers(c)  29    184,900    5.1  6,376  

Decision of the Board on September 14, 2011

 Other executive officers  274    624,000    17.1  2,277  
 Other employees(d)  9,658    2,840,870    77.8  294  
 Total  9,961    3,649,770    100  366  
      Number of
beneficiaries
  

Number

of notified
shares
(a)

  Percentage  Average
number of
shares per
beneficiary
 
2009 Plan(b) Main executive officers(c)  25    48,700    1.6  1,948  
Decision of the Board on September 15, 2009 Other executive officers  284    329,912    11.1  1,162  
 Other employees(d)  9,693    2,593,406    87.3  268  
 Total  10,002    2,972,018    100  297  
2010 Plan(b)(e) Main executive officers(c)  24    46,780    1.6  1,949  
Decision of the Board on September 14, 2010 Other executive officers  283    343,080    11.4  1,212  
 Other employees(d)  10,074    2,620,151    87.0  260  
 Total  10,381    3,010,011    100  290  
2011 Plan(b) Main executive officers(c)  29    184,900    5.1  6,376  
Decision of the Board on September 14, 2011 Other executive officers  274    624,000    17.1  2,277  
 Other employees(d)  9,658    2,840,870    77.8  294  
 Total  9,961    3,649,770    100  366  
2012 Plan Main executive officers(c)  33    416,100    9.7  12,609  
Decision of the Board on July 26, 2012 Other executive officers  274    873,000    20.3  3,186  
 Other employees(d)  9,698    3,006,830    70.0  310  
 Total  10,005    4,295,930    100  429  
2013 Plan Main executive officers(c)  32    422,600    9.5  13,206  
Decision of the Board on July 25, 2013 Other executive officers  277    934,500    20.9  3,374  
 Other employees(d)  9,625    3,107,100    69.6  323  
  Total  9,934    4,464,200    100  449  

 

(a)

The number of notified performance shares awarded shown in this table has not been adjusted to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006.

(b)

For the 2005, 2006, 20072009, 2010 and 2009 Plans, the acquisition rates of the shares awarded, linked to the performance conditions, were 100%. For the 2008 Plan,2011 plans, the acquisition rate linked toof the performance condition,performance-related shares awarded was 60%100%.

(c)

Members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer as of the date of the Board meeting granting the performance shares. The Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officerexecutive directors were not awarded any performance shares, with the exception of the 2011, Plan. On September 14, 2011, the2012 and 2013 plans. The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. decided to grantaward Mr. de Margerie 16,000 performance shares to Mr. de Margerie.under the 2011 plan, 53,000 performance shares under the 2012 plan and 53,000 performance shares under the 2013 plan.

(d)

Mr. Clément, an employee of Total Raffinage Marketing, a subsidiaryRaffinage-Chimie (subsidiary of TOTAL S.A.) and the director of TOTAL S.A. representingwho represented employee shareholders until May 17, 2013, was awarded 320 performance shares under the 2005 Plan, 200 performance shares under the 2007 Plan, 500 performance shares under the 2008 Plan, 240 performance shares under the 2010 Planplan, 240 shares under the 2011 plan and 240260 shares under the 2012 plan. Mr. Keller, an employee of TOTAL S.A. and director of TOTAL S.A. who has represented employee shareholders since May 17, 2013, was awarded 400 performance shares under the 2011 Plan.2013 plan.

(e)

Excluding free shares granted as part ofunder the 2010 global free share plan.

The grant of these

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.115


Item 6 - Compensation

These performance shares, which were previously bought back by the Company on the market, will become final afterare definitively awarded at the end of a2-year vesting period. For the 2013 plan, the vesting period has been extended to three years. This finaldefinitive grant is subject to a presence condition and a performance condition (see “— Stock options and performance share grants policy — General policy”).condition. Moreover, the transferdisposal of the performance shares will not be permittedthat have been definitively awarded cannot occur until the end of a 2-year mandatory holding period.

PERFORMANCE SHARE PLANS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011

 

    2005 Plan(a)  2006 Plan  2007 Plan  2008 Plan  2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan 

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

   05/17/2005    05/17/2005    05/17/2005    05/16/2008    05/16/2008    05/16/2008    05/13/2011  

Grant date(b)

   07/19/2005    07/18/2006    07/17/2007    10/09/2008    09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011  

Closing price on grant date(c)

   52.13    50.40    61.62    35.945    41.615    39.425    32.69  

Average repurchase price per share paid by the Company

   51.62    51.91    61.49    41.63    38.54    39.11    39.58  

Total number of performance shares awarded, including to

   2,280,520    2,275,364    2,366,365    2,791,968    2,972,018    3,010,011    3,649,770  

—Directors(d)

   416    416    432    588        240    16,240  

—Ten employees with largest grants(e)

   20,000    20,000    20,000    20,000    20,000    20,000    91,400  

Start of the vesting period:

   07/19/2005    07/18/2006    07/17/2007    10/09/2008    09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011  

Date of final grant, subject to specific condition (end of the vesting period)

   07/20/2007    07/19/2008    07/18/2009    10/10/2010    09/16/2011    09/15/2012    09/15/2013  

Transfer possible from (end of the mandatory holding period)

   07/20/2009    07/19/2010    07/18/2011    10/10/2012    09/16/2013    09/15/2014    09/15/2015  

Number of performance shares:

        

— Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

                   2,954,336    3,000,637      

—Awarded in 2011

                        3,649,770  

—Canceled in 2011

   800(g)   700(g)   792(g)   356(g)   (26,214  (10,750  (19,579

—Finally granted in 2011(f)

   (800)(g)   (700)(g)   (792)(g)   (356)(g)   (2,928,122  (1,836    

—Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

                       2,988,051    3,630,191  

Historic overview of TOTAL performance share plans

i. Past award of TOTAL performance shares– Information on granted performance shares (AMF Table No. 10):

   2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  2012 Plan  2013 Plan 

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

  05/16/2008    05/16/2008    05/13/2011    05/13/2011    05/13/2011  

Date of Board meeting / grant date

  09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011    07/26/2012    07/25/2013  

Closing price on grant date

  41.615    39.425    32.690    36.120    40.005  

Average repurchase price per share paid by the Company

  38.540    39.110    39.580    38.810    40.560  

Total number of performance shares awarded, including to:

  2,972,018    3,010,011    3,649,770    4,295,930    4,464,200  

– Executive and non executive directors(a)

      240    16,240    53,260    53,400  

– C. de Margerie

          16,000    53,000    53,000  

– C. Keller

  n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    400  

– C. Clément

  n/a    240    240    260      

Start of the vesting period

  09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011    07/26/2012    07/25/2013  

Definitive grant date, subject to the conditions set out (end of the vesting period)

  09/16/2011    09/15/2012    09/15/2013    07/27/2014    07/26/2016  

Disposal possible from (end of the mandatory holding period)

  09/16/2013    09/15/2014    09/15/2015    07/27/2016    07/26/2018  

Number of performance shares:

     

– Outstanding as of January 1, 2013

          3,605,806    4,295,930   

– Notified in 2013

                  4,464,200  

– Canceled in 2013

          (14,970  (17,340  (3,810

– Definitively awarded in 2013(b)

          (3,590,836  (180    

– Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

              4,278,410    4,460,390  

 

(a)

The numberList of performance shares awarded has been multiplied by four to take into accountexecutive and non executive directors who had this status during the four-for-one stock split approved by TOTAL Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006.fiscal year 2013.

(b)

The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the performance share grant, except for the performance shares awarded on October 9, 2008, approved by the Board on September 9, 2008.

(c)To take into account the four-for-one stock split in May 18, 2006, the closing price for TOTAL shares on July 19, 2005 (208.50) has been divided by four.
(d)Mr. Desmarest, Chairman of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. until May 21, 2010, and Mr. de Margerie, Chief Executive Officer since February 13, 2007 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since May 21, 2010, were not awarded performance shares under the plans approved by the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. on July 18, 2006, July 17, 2007, September 9, 2008, September 15, 2009 and September 14, 2010. Furthermore, Mr. Desmarest was not awarded performance shares under the plan approved by the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. on July 19, 2005. On September 14, 2011, the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. decided to grant 16,000 performance shares to Mr. de Margerie. In addition, Mr. Boeuf, director of TOTAL S.A. representing employee shareholders until December 31, 2009, was awarded performance shares under the plans approved by the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. on July 19, 2005, July 18, 2006, July 17, 2007 and September 9, 2008. Mr. Boeuf was not awarded any performance shares under the plan approved by the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. on September 15, 2009.
Mr. Clément, director of TOTAL S.A. representing employee shareholders since May 21, 2010, was awarded 240 performance shares under the plan approved by the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. on September 14, 2011. In addition, Mr. Clément was awarded 240 performance shares under the plan approved by the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. on September 14, 2010.
(e)Employees of TOTAL S.A., or of any Group company, who were not directors of TOTAL S.A. as of the date of grant.
(f)For the 2010 Plan, finalDefinitive grants following the death of the beneficiary.their beneficiaries (2012 plan for fiscal year 2013).
(g)Performance shares finally awarded for which the entitlement right had been canceled erroneously.

In case of a finaldefinitive grant of all the outstanding performance shares as ofoutstanding at December 31, 2011, the corresponding2013, these shares would represent 0.27%0.36%(1)of the Company’s potential share capital as of suchthe Company on that date.

ii. TOTAL global free share plan:

In addition to the restricted shares granted, on May 21, 2010 the Board of Directors decided to implement a global free share plan intended for all the Group’s employees, i.e. more than 100,000 employees. On June 30, 2010, rights to 25 free shares were granted to every employee.

The definitive grant is subject to a presence condition during the plan’s vesting period. Depending on the countries in which the Group’s companies are located, the vesting period is either two years followed by a 2-year holding period in countries with a 2+2 structure, or four years without a holding period in countries with a 4+0 structure. Moreover, the granted shares are not subject to any performance condition.

At the end of the vesting period, the granted shares will become new shares resulting from a TOTAL S.A. capital increase by capitalization of reserves or issue premiums.

 

(1)

Out ofBased on a total potential share capital of 2,408,400,2252,403,907,748 shares.

116TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


FOLLOW-UP OF THE GLOBAL FREE SHARE PLANItem 6 - Compensation

 

    2010 Plan
(2+2)
(b)
  2010 Plan
(4+0)
(c)
  Total 

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

   05/16/2008    05/16/2008   

Grant date(a)

   06/30/2010    06/30/2010   

Final grant date

   07/01/2012    07/01/2014   

Transfer possible from

   07/01/2014    07/01/2014      

Outstanding as of January 1, 2010

    

Awarded

   1,508,850    1,070,650    2,579,500  

Canceled

   (125  (75  (200

Finally granted(d)

   (75   (75

Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

   1,508,650    1,070,575    2,579,225  

Awarded

             

Canceled

   (29,175  (54,625  (83,800

Finally granted(d)

   (475  (425  (900

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

   1,479,000    1,015,525    2,494,525  

On July 2, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer acknowledged the creation and definitive grant of 1,366,950 shares to the designated beneficiaries at the end the 2-year vesting period.

    2010 Plan (2+2)  2010 Plan (4+0)  Total 

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

   05/16/2008    05/16/2008   

Date of Board meeting / grant date(a)

   06/30/2010    06/30/2010   

Total number of shares awarded, including to:

   1,506,575    1,070,650    2,577,225  

– Executive and non executive directors(b)

   50        50  

– C. Keller

   25        25  

– C. Clément

   25        25  

Definitive grant date (end of the vesting period)

   07/01/2012    07/01/2014   

Disposal possible from

   07/01/2014    07/01/2014   

Number of restricted shares

             

Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

   1,508,650    1,070,575    2,579,225  

Notified

             

Canceled

   (29,175  (54,625  (83,800

Definitively granted

   (475  (425  (900

Outstanding as of January 1, 2012

   1,479,000    1,015,525    2,494,525  

Notified

             

Canceled

   (111,725  (40,275  (152,000

Definitively granted(c)

   (1,367,275  (350  (1,367,625

Outstanding as of January 1, 2013

       974,900    974,900  

Notified

             

Canceled

   100    (101,150  (101,050

Definitively granted

   (100  (275  (375

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

       873,475    873,475  

 

(a)

The June 30, 2010 grant was decidedapproved by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010.

(b)

Vesting periodList of two years followed by a holding period of two years.executive and non executive directors who had this status during the fiscal year 2013.

(c)

Vesting periodDefinitive grant of four years without a holding1,366,950 shares to the designated beneficiaries at the end of the 2-year vesting period.

(d)Final grant following the death or disability of the beneficiary of the shares.

In case of a finaldefinitive grant of all the restricted shares outstanding shares as ofat December 31, 2011, the corresponding2013, these shares would represent 0.10%0.036%(1) of the Company’s potential share capital as of suchthe Company on that date.

PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANTS TO THE TEN EMPLOYEES (OTHER THAN CORPORATE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS) RECEIVING THE LARGEST NUMBER OF PERFORMANCE SHARES

Performance share grants to the ten employees (other than executive and non executive directors) receiving the largest number of performance shares

 

    Number of
performance
shares
granted/finallynotified/definitively
awarded
   Grant date   DateDefinitive grant
date (end of
final grant
(end of the
vesting
period)
   End Availability
date (end
of
mandatory
holding
periodperiod)
 

Performance share grants approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting on September 14, 2011July 25, 2013 to the ten TOTAL S.A. employees (other than corporate executive officers)and non executive directors) receiving the largest number of performance shares(a)

   91,400193,10007/25/201307/26/201607/26/2018

Performance shares definitively awarded in 2013, under the performance share grant plan approved by the Board of Directors on September 14, 2011, to the ten TOTAL S.A. employees (who were not executive and non executive directors at the time of the approval) receiving the largest number of performance shares(b)

84,500     09/14/2011     09/15/2013     09/15/2015  

Performance shares finally awarded in 2011 following the performance share plan approved by the Board meeting on September 15, 2009, to the ten employees (other than corporate executive officers) at the time of such approval receiving the largest number of performance shares(b)

20,00009/15/200909/16/201109/16/2013

 

(a)

Grant approved by the Board on September 14, 2011. Grants of these performanceThese shares will become final,be definitively awarded at the end of a 3-year vesting period, i.e., on July 26, 2016, subject to a performance condition after a 2-year vesting period (i.e., on September 15, 2013) (see “— Stock options and performance share grants policy — General policy”).being met. Moreover, the transferdisposal of the performance shares will not be permittedthat have been definitively awarded cannot occur until the end of a 2-year mandatory holding period, (i.e.i.e., on September 15, 2015).from July 26, 2018.

(b)

This finaldefinitive grant is subject to a performance condition (see “— Stock options and performance share grants policy — General policy”).condition. The acquisition rate of the performance-related shares awarded linked to the performance condition, was 100%. Moreover, the transferdisposal of the performance shares finallythat have been definitively awarded will only be permitted aftercannot occur until the end of a 2-year mandatory holding period, (i.e.i.e., from September 16, 2013).15, 2015.

(1)

Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares.

 

(1)Out of a total potential share capital of 2,408,400,225 shares.
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.117


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

For several years, TOTAL has been actively examining corporate governance matters. At its meeting on November 4, 2008, the Board of Directors confirmed its decision to refer to the Corporate Governance Code for Listed Companies published by the principal French business confederations, theAssociation Française des Entreprises Privées (AFEP) and theMouvement des Entreprises de France (MEDEF) (“AFEP-MEDEF Code”) for corporate governance matters.

The AFEP-MEDEF Code was amendedrevised in April 2010June 2013 to makeintroduce new changes regarding, in particular, a consultation procedure in which shareholders can express an opinion on the individual compensation of the executive directors (dirigeants mandataires sociaux) (say on pay), as well as the establishment of a High Committee for corporate governance, an independent structure in charge of monitoring implementation of the Code.

Pursuant to Article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code, the following table sets forth the recommendations related to the balanced number of men and women sitting in Board and Committees’ meetings. The code recommends that a target of at least 20% of women be reached before April 2013 and at least 40% before April 2016. These requirements were also stipulatedmade in the French law of January 27, 2011 regarding balanced representation of men and women on Boards of Directors and Supervisory Boards and equal opportunity. The law statesAFEP-MEDEF Code that the 20% threshold must be attained atCompany has not followed and the endreasons for such decision.

Recommendations not followedExplanations — Practice followed by TOTAL

Director independence criteria (paragraph 9 of the Code)

Criteria to be examined for a director to be considered as independent:

• Has not been a director of the Company for more than twelve years.

In assessing the independence of four directors, the Board has disregarded the criterion of a maximum term of office of twelve years. The Board was of the opinion that this criterion had no relevance given, on the one hand, the specific characteristics of the oil and gas sector, which relies on long-term investment cycles on one hand, and, on the other hand, the objectivity that these four directors have demonstrated in the Board’s activity on the other hand. In addition, it deemed that the experience acquired on the Board by these four directors strengthened their freedom of speech and their independence of judgment and, therefore, benefited the Group. The Board also noted that the criterion related to the length of term of office was not one of the independence criteria required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).See “— Directors and Senior Management — Director independence”, above.

The Board’s assessment (paragraph 10.4 of the Code)

It is recommended that non-executive directors meet periodically without the participation of the executive or “in house” directors. The rules of procedure of the Board of Directors should provide for one meeting of this kind per year, during which the performance of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the Deputy Chief Executive Officer(s) would be evaluated, and which would be an opportunity to reflect periodically on the future of the 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting and that the 40% threshold must be attained at the end of the 2017 Shareholders’ Meeting.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company’s management.

Although the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors do not expressly provide that one meeting of the non-executive directors be held per year without the participation of the executive or “in house” directors, the Board of Directors’ practice constitutes a mechanism which has the same effect as the recommendation made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.

At its meeting held each year in February, the Board of Directors indeed evaluates the performances of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, where applicable, reflects on the future of the Company’s management. When these particular matters are reviewed, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as the members of the Executive Committee present at the meeting (that are not executive and non-executive directors), leave the Board meeting. The Honorary Chairman then serves as Chairman of the Board with regard to these matters.

Grant of performance shares (paragraph 23.2.4 of the Code)

In accordance with terms determined by the Board and announced upon the award, the performance shares awarded to executive directors are conditional upon the acquisition of a defined quantity of shares once the awarded shares are available.

Given the share holding requirements that the Board of Directors impose on the executive directors whereby such directors must hold a number of shares of the Company equivalent in value to two years of the fixed portion of their annual compensation, and given the number of TOTAL shares and shares of the “Total Actionnariat France” collective investment fund (invested exclusively in TOTAL shares) effectively held by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(1), the Board of Directors, upon the Compensation Committee’s proposal, deemed that it was not necessary, at the time of grant, to make the performance shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer subject to the purchase of a quantity of shares at the time of availability of the performance shares. The share holding requirements to which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is subject constitute a mechanism that has the same effect as the recommendation made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.

(1)

As of December 31, 2013, Mr. de Margerie held 121,556 shares of TOTAL, including 16,000 performance shares that had been definitively granted to him on September 15, 2013 within the scope of the performance share plan dated September 14, 2011, as well as 65,242 shares of the “Total Actionnariat France” collective investment fund.

118TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

Recommendations not followedExplanations — Practice followed by TOTAL

Additional pension schemes (paragraph 23.2.6 of the Code)

Supplementary pension schemes with defined benefits must be subject to the condition that the beneficiary must be a director or employee of the company when claiming his or her pension rights pursuant to the applicable rules.

It appeared justified not to deprive the concerned beneficiaries of the benefit of the pension commitments made by the Company in special cases of the disability or departure of a beneficiary over 55 years of age at the initiative of the Group.

Board of Directors practices

Management form

On May 21, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to reunify the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and appoint the Chief Executive Officer as Chairman of the Board. This decision was comprised of four women out of a total of fifteen members (i.e., 26%). Atmade further to the Shareholders’ Meeting in May 2012, it will be proposed to appoint one additional woman to replace one director whose term is coming to an end. If the resolution is approvedwork done by the Shareholders’ Meeting,Governance & Ethics Committee (formerly the proportionNominating & Governance Committee) and in the best interests of women sitting on the Board will be one-third. Company, taking into account the advantage of the unified management and the majority of independent directors appointed at the Committees, which ensures balanced authority.

The Board of Directors will keep examiningdeemed that the unified management form was the most appropriate to the Group’s organization, modus operandi and business, and the specificities of the oil and gas sector. It respects the respective prerogatives of the various Company corporate bodies (Shareholders’ Meeting, Board of Directors, general management).

It was confirmed during the Board of Directors’ meeting held on May 11, 2012, at which Mr. Christophe de Margerie was reappointed as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Moreover, the Company bylaws and the respective rules of procedure of the Board of Directors and its Committees provide the guarantees required to implement best governance issuespractices within a unified management framework. In particular, the bylaws allow the Board to keep diversifyingnominate one or two Vice-Chairmen. They also state that the Board of Directors can be summoned by any means, even verbally, or at short notice in the yearsevent of an emergency, by the Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, or one-third of the members, at any time and whenever the Company’s interest so requires. The rules of procedure of the Board of Directors also state that each director is required to come.inform the Board of Directors of any conflicts of interest, actual or potential, with the Company or with any other company in the Group, and to abstain from voting on the resolution in question, and even to refrain from taking part in the debate preceding the vote.

In addition, the current composition of the Board of Directors and its Committees ensures a balance of power within the Company’s bodies given the high proportion of independent directors serving on the Board and Committees, the full involvement of the directors in the activity of the Board and its Committees, and the diversity of their profiles, skills and expertise.

Performance and evaluation

At its meeting on February 12, 2013, the Board of Directors discussed its practices on the basis of a formal evaluation

organized by an external consultant. This evaluation was carried out in the form of interviews conducted by the external consultant with each Director based on a detailed questionnaire.

The evaluation showed that the Directors were satisfied with the workings of the Board of Directors and its Committees and that the Directors noted an improvement. Suggestions for progress were made in the conclusions of the report. At the recommendation of the Governance & Ethics Committee (then the Nominating & Governance Committee), the Board of Directors approved the proposed guidelines, which mainly entail increasing the number of Strategic Committee meetings and holding a Board meeting at an industrial site.

At its meeting on February 8, 2012,11, 2014, the NominatingBoard of Directors discussed its practices on the basis of a formal evaluation carried out by means of a detailed questionnaire to which all the Directors responded. The responses given by the Directors were then presented to the Governance & GovernanceEthics Committee examined current practices infor review and summarized. This summary was then discussed by the Company in viewBoard of Directors. This process made it possible to confirm each Director’s good contribution to the work of the AFEP-MEDEF codeBoard and concluded that the Company complied with almost all the recommendations.its Committees.

Mr. Thierry Desmarest, Honorary ChairmanThe formal evaluation showed a generally positive opinion of the Company and director, can still be entrusted with representative missions for the Group, by decisionpractices of the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010.

Since 2004,and the Committees, which highlighted that the improvements requested by the Directors in 2013 had been generally made. To continue the improvement of its functioning, the Board oftook into account the main suggestions made by the Directors has had a Financial Code of Ethics that, in the overall context2014 self-assesment, which mainly concerned a review at the outset of the Group’s

Codemeeting of Conduct, sets forth specific rules for its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officerthe major points (e.g., financial statements, large-scale investments and divestments projects) and a presentation of new topics at the financial and accounting officers for its principal activities. The Board has mademeetings of the AuditStrategic Committee responsible for implementing and ensuring compliance with this code.

In 2005,(e.g., monitoring of significant development projects, analysis of major risks that may affect the Board approvedstrategy of the procedure for alerting the Audit Committee of complaints or concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters.Group).

Rules of procedure of the Board of Directors

At its meeting on February 13, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted rules of procedure to replace the Directors’ Charter.

The Board’s rules of procedure specify the obligations of each director and set forth the mission and working procedures of the Board of Directors. They also define the respective responsibilities and authority of the Chairman and of the Chief Executive Officer. It isThey are reviewed on a regular basis to match the changes in rules and practices related to governance.

AnThe unabridged version of these rules of procedure which were approved by theis available herein in its latest version dated October 30, 2012:

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.119


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.(1), is available herein.

Missionapproved the rules of the Board of Directorsprocedure.

The mission of the Board of Directors is to determine the strategic direction of the Group and supervise the implementation of this vision. With the exception of the powers and authority expressly reserved for shareholders and within the limits of the Company’s legal purpose, the Board may address any issue related to the operation of the Company and take any decision concerning the matters falling within its purview. Within this framework, the Board’s duties and responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

I.Mission of the Board of Directors:The mission of the Board of Directors is to determine the strategic direction of the Company and supervise the implementation of this vision. With the exception of the powers and authority expressly reserved for shareholders and within the limits of the Company’s legal purpose, the Board may address any issue related to the operation of the Company and take any decision concerning the matters falling within its purview. Within this framework, the Board’s duties and responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:

o 

appointing the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officerexecutive directors(2)and supervising the handling of their responsibilities;

defining the Company’s strategic orientation and, more generally, that of the Group;

(1)In these rules of procedure, TOTAL S.A. is referred to as the “Company” and, collectively with all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, as the “Group”.
(2)The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, if the Chairman of the Board of Directors is also responsible for the general management of the Company, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer, if this is not the case, and, where appropriate, any acting Managing Directors, in accordance with the organization adopted by the Board of Directors.

approving investments or divestments under study by the Group that concern amounts greater than 3% of shareholders’ equity;

reviewing information on significant events related to the Company’s affairs, in particular for investments or divestments that are greater than 1% of shareholders’ equity;

conducting audits and investigations as it may deem appropriate. The Board, with the assistance of the Audit Committee where appropriate, ensures that:

 o 

defining the proper definition of authority within the CompanyCompany’s strategic orientation and, the proper exercise of duties and responsibilities by the bodiesmore generally, that of the Company are in place;Group;

 o 

no individual is authorized to contract on behalfapproving investments or divestments under study by the Group that concern amounts greater than 3% of the Company or to commit to pay, or to make payments, on behalf of the Company, without proper supervision and control;shareholders’ equity;

 o 

reviewing information on significant events related to the internal control function operates properly andCompany’s affairs, in particular for investments or divestments that the statutory auditors are able to conduct their audits under appropriate circumstances;greater than 1% of shareholders’ equity;

 o 

conducting audits and investigations as it may deem appropriate. The Board, with the committees it has created duly perform their responsibilities;assistance of the Audit Committee where appropriate, ensures that:

monitoring the qualityproper definition of authority within the Company and the proper exercise of duties and responsibilities by the bodies of the information provided to the shareholders and the financial markets through the financial statements that it approves and the annual reports, or when major transactionsCompany are conducted;in place;

conveningno individual is authorized to contract on behalf of the Company or to commit to pay, or to make payments, on behalf of the Company, without proper supervision and setting the agenda for Shareholders’ Meetings or meetings of bondholders;control;

preparing, for each year, a list of the directorsinternal control function operates properly and that the statutory auditors are able to conduct their audits under appropriate circumstances;

the committees it deems to be independent under generally recognized corporate governance criteria.has created duly perform their responsibilities;

Directors’ obligations

Before accepting a directorship, every candidate receives a copy of TOTAL S.A.’s by-laws and rules of procedure. He ensures that he has broad knowledge of the general and particular commitments related to his duty, especially the laws and regulations governing directorships in French limited liability companies (société anonyme) whose shares are listed in one or several regulated markets.
o

monitoring the quality of the information provided to the shareholders and the financial markets through the financial statements that it approves and the annual reports, or when major transactions are conducted;

o

convening and setting the agenda for Shareholders’ Meetings or meetings of bond holders;

o

preparing, for each year, a list of the directors it deems to be independent under generally recognized corporate governance criteria.

II.Obligations of the Directors of TOTAL S.A.:Before accepting a directorship, every candidate receives a copy of TOTAL S.A.’s bylaws and these rules of procedure. He ensures that he has broad knowledge of the general and particular commitments related to his duty, especially the laws and regulations governing directorships in French limited liability companies (société anonyme) whose shares are listed in one or several regulated markets.

Accepting a directorship involves upholding the Directors’ ethical rules as described in the Code of Corporate Governance to which the Company refers. It also involves upholding the rules of procedure and the Group’s values as described in its Code of Conduct.

When directors participate in and vote at Board meetings, they are required to represent the interest of the shareholders and the Company as a whole.

Independence of judgment: Directors undertake, under any circumstance, to maintain the independence of their

o

Independence of judgment: Directors undertake, under any circumstance, to maintain the independence of their analysis, judgment, decision-making and actions as well as not to be unduly influenced, directly or indirectly, by other directors, particular groups of shareholders, creditors, suppliers and, more generally, any third party.

analysis, judgment, decision making and actions as well as not to be unduly influenced, directly or indirectly, by other directors, particular groups of shareholders, creditors, suppliers and, more generally, any third party.

Preparation of each Board meeting: Directors undertake to devote the amount of time required to consider the information they are given and otherwise prepare for meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they sit. Directors may request any additional information that they feel is necessary or useful from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
o

Participation in the Board’s work: Directors undertake to devote the amount of time required to consider the information they are given and otherwise prepare for meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they sit. Directors may request any additional information that they feel is necessary or useful from the executive directors. Directors, if they consider it necessary, may request training on the Company’s specificities, businesses and activities, and any other training that is of use in the exercise of their duties as Directors.

Directors attend all Board meetings and all committees or Shareholders’ Meetings, unless they have previously contacted the Chairman of the Board to inform him of scheduling conflicts.

Files reviewed at each meeting of the Board as well as the information collected before or during the meetings are confidential. Directors cannot use them for or share them with a third party whatever the reason. Directors take any necessary measures to keep them confidential. Confidentiality and privacy are lifted when such information is made publicly available by the Company.

The Chairman of the Board makes sure that the Company provides the directors with the relevant information, including criticisms, in particular financial statement reports and press releases, and the main press articles about the Company.

Duty of loyalty

o

Duty of loyalty:: Directors cannot take advantage of their office or duties to ensure, for themselves or a third party, any monetary or non-monetary benefit.

They notify the Board of Directors of any potential conflicts of interest with the Company or any other company of the Group. They refrain from participating in the vote relating to the corresponding resolution or even to the debate preceding the vote.

(1)

TOTAL S.A. is referred to in the rules of procedure as the “Company” and collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries as the “Group”.

(2)

“Executive directors” means the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer if the Chairman of the Board of Directors is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and otherwise the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer, as well as, where applicable, any Deputy Chief Executive Officer, based on the organization adopted by the Board of Directors.

120TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

Directors must inform the Board of Directors of their entering into a transaction that involves directly the Company or any other company of the Group before such transaction is closed.

Directors cannot take any responsibility in a personal capacity in companies or businesses that are competing with the Company or any other company of the Group without previously informing the Board.

Directors are committed not to seek or accept directly or indirectly from the Company or any other company of the Group benefits that may be considered as compromising their independence.

o

Duty of expression: Directors are committed to clearly expressing their opposition if they deem that a decision made by the Board of Directors is contrary to the Company’s corporate interest and should strive to convince the Board of the relevancy of their position.

o

Transactions in the Company’s securities and stock exchange rules: While in office, directors are required to hold the minimum number of registered shares of the Company as set by the bylaws.

In general, directors must act with the highest degree of prudence and vigilance when completing any personal transaction involving the financial instruments of the relevancy of their position.Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates which are listed or issue listed financial instruments.

Company’s securities and stock exchange rules: While in office, directors are required to hold the minimum number of registered shares as set by the Company’s by-laws.

Directors refrain from trading any shares and ADRs of TOTAL S.A. and its publicly traded subsidiaries for which they hold non-public information that could impact the securities’ market value. To this purpose, directors act in compliance with the following procedures:

 

any shares and ADRs of TOTAL S.A. and its publicly traded subsidiaries are to be held in registered form, either with the Company or its agent(1), or administered registered shares with a French broker (or U.S. broker for ADRs) whose contact details are communicated to the Board’s Secretary by the director;

buyingAny shares and ADRs of TOTAL S.A. and its publicly-traded subsidiaries are to be held in registered form, either with the Company or its agent, or administered registered shares with a French broker (or U.S. broker for ADRs) whose contact details are communicated to the Board’s Secretary by the director.

Directors refrain from directly or indirectly completing (or recommending the completion of) any transaction involving the financial instruments (shares, ADRs or any other financial instruments related to such financial instruments) of the Company, its publicly-traded subsidiaries or affiliates or listed financial instruments for which the director has inside information.

Inside information is specific information which has not yet been made public and which directly or indirectly concerns one or more issuers of financial instruments or one or more financial instruments and which, if it were made public, could have a significant impact on marginthe price of the financial instruments concerned or short selling (Paris option market (MONEP), warrants, exchangeable obligations, etc.) those same securities is also prohibited;on the price of financial instruments related to them.

anyAny transaction on the TOTAL share (or ADR)Company’s financial instruments (share, ADR or related financial instruments) is strictly prohibited including hedging transactions, on the day when the Company discloses its periodic earnings (quarterly, interim and annual) as well as the fifteenthirty calendar days preceding such date; anddate.

Moreover, directors comply, where applicable, with the provisions of Article L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, which stipulates that free shares may not be sold:

 

directors make

during the ten trading days preceding and the three trading days following the date on which the consolidated financial statements or, failing that, the annual financial statements, are made public;
during the period between the date on which the Company’s corporate bodies have knowledge of information which, if it were made public, could have a significant impact on the price of the shares of the Company, and ten trading days following the date on which such information is made public.

Directors are prohibited from carrying out any transaction on financial instruments related to the Company’s share (Paris option market (MONEP), warrants, exchangeable bonds, etc.) and from buying on margin or short selling such financial instruments.

Directors are also prohibited from hedging the shares of the Company and any financial instruments related to them, and in particular:

all necessary arrangements to declareshares of the Company which they hold, and, where applicable,
Company share subscription or purchase options,
rights to the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés financiers) and informshares of the Board’s secretary, undercompany which may be awarded free of charge,
shares of the form and timeframe provided for by applicable laws,Company from the exercise of any transaction on the company’s securities entered into by himselfoptions or any other individual with whom he is closely related.

granted free of charge.

Workings

Directors make all necessary arrangements to declare to the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés financiers) and inform the Board’s secretary, under the form and timeframe provided for by applicable laws, of any transaction on the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors meets at least four times a year and as often as circumstances may require.

Before each meeting of the Board, the agendacompany’s securities entered into by himself or any other individual with whom he is sent out to directors and, whenever possible, it is sent together with the documents that are necessary to consider.closely related.

III.Workings of the Board of Directors: The Board of Directors meets at least four times a year and as often as circumstances may require. Before each meeting of the Board, the agenda is sent out to directors and, whenever possible, it is sent together with the documents that are necessary to consider.

Directors can delegate their authority to another director at the meetings of the Board, within the limit of one delegation per director per meeting. Each director may represent only one of his/her colleagues during the same Board meeting.

Whenever authorized by the law, those directors attending the meeting of the Board via video conference (in compliance with the technical requirements set by applicable regulations) are considered present for the calculation of the quorum and majority.

The Board allocates directors’ fees to, and may allocate additional directors’ fees to, directors who participate on specialized committees within the total amount established by the Shareholders’ Meeting. The Chairman and the Chief Executive Officerexecutive directors are not awarded directors’ fees for their work on the Board and Committees.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.121


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

The Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of its Chairman, appoints a Secretary. Every member of the Board of Directors can refer to the Secretary and benefit from his assistance. The Secretary is responsible for the working procedures of the Board of Directors. The Board shall review such procedures periodically.

The Board conducts, at regular intervals not to exceed three years, an assessment of its practices. Such assessment is carried out possibly under the supervision of an independent director or with the contribution of an outside counsel. In addition, the Board of Directors conducts an annual discussion of its methods.

Responsibility and authority of the Chairman

The Chairman represents the Board, and, except under exceptional circumstances, is the sole member authorized to act and speak on behalf of the Board.

IV.Responsibility and authority of the Chairman:The Chairman represents the Board, and, except under exceptional circumstances, is the sole member authorized to act and speak on behalf of the Board.

He is responsible for organizing and presiding over the Board’s activities and monitors corporate bodies to ensure that they are functioning effectively and respecting corporate governance principles. He coordinates the activity of the Board and its committees. He sets the agenda for the meeting by including the issues proposed by the Chief Executive Officer.

He ensures that directors have in due course clear and appropriate information that is necessary to carry out their duties.

He is responsible, with the Group’s general management, for maintaining relations between the Board and the Company’s shareholders. He monitors the quality of the information disclosed by the Company.

In close cooperation with the Group’s general management, he may represent the Group in high-level discussions with government authorities and the Group’s important partners, on both a national and international level.

(1)Currently, BNP Paribas Securities Services for TOTAL shares and Bank of New York for TOTAL ADRs.

He is regularly informed by the Chief Executive Officer of events and situations that are important for the Group relating to the strategy, organization, monthly financial reporting, major investment and divestment projects and major financial operations. He may request that the Chief Executive Officer or other Company directors,officers, provided the Chief Executive Officer is informed, provide any useful information for the Board or its committees to carry out their duties.

He may also workmeet with the statutory auditors in order to prepare matters beforethe work of the Board orof Directors and the Audit Committee.

He presents every year in a report to the Shareholders’ Meeting practiceson the conditions surrounding the preparation and organization of the Board of Directors andBoard’s work, the potential limits set by the Board of Directors concerning the powers of the Chief Executive Officer.Officer, and the internal control procedures implemented by the Company. For this purpose, he receives from the Chief Executive Officer the relevant information.

Authority of the Chief Executive Officer

The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the general management of the Company. He chairs the Group’s Executive Committee and Management Committee. Subject to the Company’s corporate governance rules and in particular the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors, he has the full extent of authority to act on behalf of the Company in all instances, with the exception of actions that are, by law, reserved to the Board of Directors or to Shareholders’ meetings.

V.Authority of the Chief Executive Officer:The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the general management of the Company. He chairs the Group’s Executive Committee and Management Committee. Subject to the Company’s corporate governance rules and in particular the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors, he has the full extent of authority to act on behalf of the Company in all instances, with the exception of actions that are, by law, reserved to the Board of Directors or to Shareholders’ meetings.

The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for periodic reporting of the Group’s results and outlook to shareholders and the financial community.

At each meeting of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer reports the highlights of the Group’s activity.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors approved the creation of:

VI.Committees of the Board of Directors:The Board of Directors approved the creation of:

 

an Audit Committee;

a Nominating & Governance Committee;

a Compensation Committee; and

a Strategic Committee.

o

an Audit Committee;

o

a Nominating & Governance Committee;

o

a Compensation Committee; and

o

a Strategic Committee.

The missions and composition of these committees are defined in their relevant rules of procedure approved by the Board of Directors.

The Committees carry out their duty for and report to the Board of Directors.

Each committee reports on its activities to the Board of Directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Committees of the Board of Directors are: anthe Audit Committee; athe Compensation Committee; the Governance & Ethics Committee (formerly Nominating & Governance Committee; a Compensation Committee;Committee); and athe Strategic Committee.

On April 28, 2011, the Board agreed in principle on the creation of a new Strategic Committee, the composition and rules of which it approved at its meeting on July 28, 2011. This Committee was set up and met for the first time on September 14, 2011.

The composition and an unabridged version of the rules of proceduresprocedure of the Committees of the Board of Directors is available herein.herein, followed by the composition of each Committee.

Audit Committee

The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Audit Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors on February 12, 2013, is available herein:

Rules of procedure (unabridged version)

The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” and, collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries, as the “Group”) has approved the following rules of procedure of the Company’s Audit Committee (hereafter, the “Committee”).

The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.

Mission:To allow the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. to ensure that internal control is effective and that published information available to shareholders and financial markets is reliable, the duties of the Committee include:

122TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

 

recommending the appointment of statutory auditors and their compensation, ensuring their independence and monitoring their work;

I.Duties:To allow the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. to ensure that internal control is effective and that published information available to shareholders and financial markets is reliable, the duties of the Committee include:

establishing the rules for the use of statutory auditors for non-audit services and verifying their implementation;

o

recommending the appointment of statutory auditors and their compensation, ensuring their independence and monitoring their work;

o

establishing the rules for the use of statutory auditors for non-audit services and verifying their implementation;

o

supervising the audit by the statutory auditors of the Company’s statutory financial statements and consolidated financial statements;

o

examining the assumptions used to prepare the financial statements, assessing the validity of the methods used to handle significant transactions and examining the Company’s statutory financial statements and consolidated annual, semi-annual, and quarterly financial statements prior to their examination by the Board of Directors, after regularly monitoring the financial situation, cash position and commitments included in the annual financial statements of the Company;

o

supervising the implementation of internal control and risk management procedures and their effective application, with the assistance of the internal audit department;

o

supervising procedures for preparing financial information;

o

monitoring the implementation and activities of the disclosure committee, including reviewing the conclusions of this committee;

o

reviewing the annual work program of internal and external auditors;

o

receiving information periodically on completed audits and examining annual internal audit reports and other reports (statutory auditors, annual report, etc.);

o

reviewing the choice of appropriate accounting principles and methods used to prepare the company’s consolidated and statutory financial statements and ensuring the continuity of the methods;

o

reviewing the Group’s policy for the use of derivative instruments;

o

reviewing, if requested by the Board of Directors, major transactions contemplated by the Group;

o

reviewing significant litigation annually;

o

implementing and monitoring compliance with the financial code of ethics;

o

proposing to the Board of Directors, for implementation, a procedure for complaints or concerns of employees, shareholders and others, related to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and monitoring the implementation of this procedure;

o

where applicable, reviewing significant transactions of the Group during which a conflict of interest may have occurred; and

o

reviewing the procedure for booking the Group’s proved reserves.

supervising the audit by the statutory auditors of the Company’s statutory financial statements and consolidated financial statements;

examining the accounting policies used to prepare the financial statements and examining the Company’s statutory financial statements and consolidated annual, semi-annual, and quarterly financial statements prior to their examination by the Board of Directors, after regularly monitoring the financial situation, cash position and obligations of the Company;

supervising the implementation of internal control and risk management procedures and their effective application, with the assistance of the internal audit department;

supervising procedures for preparing financial information;

monitoring the implementation and activities of the disclosure committee, including reviewing the conclusions of this committee;

reviewing the annual work program of internal and external auditors;

receiving information periodically on completed audits and examining annual internal audit reports and other reports (statutory auditors, annual report, etc.);

reviewing the choice of appropriate accounting principles and methods;

reviewing the Group’s policy for the use of derivative instruments;

reviewing, if requested by the Board of Directors, major transactions contemplated by the Group;

reviewing significant litigation annually;

implementing and monitoring compliance with the financial code of ethics;

proposing to the Board of Directors, for implementation, a procedure for complaints or concerns of employees, shareholders and others, related to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and monitoring the implementation of this procedure; and

reviewing the procedure for booking the Group’s proved reserves.

Composition:The Committee is made up of at least three directors designated by the Board of Directors. Members must be independent directors.

II.Composition:The Committee is made up of at least three directors designated by the Board of Directors. Members must be independent directors.

In selecting the members of the Committee, the Board of Directors pays particular attention to their independence and their financial and accounting qualifications.

The Board of Directors appoints one of the members of the Committee to serve as the financial expert“financial expert” on the Committee.

Members of the Committee may not be executive officersdirectors of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, nor own more than 10% of the Company’s shares, whether directly or indirectly, individually or acting together with another party.

Members of the Committee may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries, either directly or indirectly, any compensation other than: (i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or, if applicable, as members of another committee of the Company’s Board; and (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment by the Company, or another Group company, which are not dependent upon future work or activities.

The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.

However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.

Organization of activities:The Committee appoints its own Chairman. The Chairman appoints the Committee secretary, who may be the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

III.Organization of activities:The Committee appoints its own Chairman. The Chairman appoints the Committee secretary, who may be the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.

The Committee meets at least fourseven times a yearyear: each quarter to review the statutory financial statements of TOTAL S.A., the annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements, and at least three other times a year to review matters not directly related to the review of the quarterly financial statements.

The Committee may also meet at the request of its Chairman, at least one-halfone half of its members, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and, if the functions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer are separate, the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Officer.

The Committee Chairman prepares the schedule of its meetings.

At each committee meeting where the quarterly financial statements are reviewed, the Group’s Chief Financial Officer presents the consolidated and statutory financial statements of TOTAL S.A. as well as the Group’s financial position and, in particular, its liquidity, cash flow and debt situation. A memo describing the company’s risk exposure and off-balance sheet commitments is communicated to the Audit Committee. This review of the financial statements includes a presentation by the statutory auditors underscoring the key points observed during their work.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.123


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

As part of monitoring the efficiency of the internal control and risk management systems, the Committee is informed of the work program of the Group Internal Control and Audit Department and its organization, on which it may issue an opinion. The Committee also receives a summary of the internal audit reports, which is presented at each committee meeting where the quarterly financial statements are reviewed. The risk management processes implemented within the Group and updates to them are presented regularly to the Audit Committee.

The Committee may meet with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, if the functions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer are separate, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and, if applicable, any acting Managing DirectorDeputy Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and perform inspections and consult with managers of operating or non-operating departments, as may be useful in performing its duties. The Chairman of the committee gives prior notice of such meeting to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, if the functions of Chairman of the Board or, if the latter is not theof Directors and Chief Executive Officer toare separate, both the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer. In particular, the Committee is authorized to consult with those involved in preparing or auditing the financial statements (Chief Financial Officer and principal Finance Department managers, Audit Department, Legal Department) by asking the Company’s Chief Financial Officer to call them to a meeting.

The Committee consults with the statutory auditors. It has the capacity of consulting themauditors and, at least once a year, without any Company representatives attending.representative being present. If it is informed of a substantial irregularity, it recommends that the Board of Directors take all appropriate action.

If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external consultants.

The proposals made by the Committee to the Board of Directors are adopted by a majority of the members present at the Committee meeting. The Chairman of the Committee casts the deciding vote if an even number of members is present at the meeting.

The Committee can adopt proposals intended for the Board of Directors without meeting if all the members of the Committee so agree and sign each proposal.

A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.

Report:The Committee submits written reports to the Board of Directors regarding its work.

IV.Report:The Committee submits written reports to the Board of Directors regarding its work.

It periodically evaluates its performance based on these rules of procedure and, if applicable, offers suggestions for improving its performance.

Members of the Audit Committee in 2013

The Committee is made up of the Audit Committee in 2011

In 2011, the Committee’s members were Ms. Patriciathree members: Mmes. Barbizet Mr. Thierry de Rudderand Coisne-Roquette and Mr. Bertrand Jacquillat, until his term as director expired on May 13, 2011. At the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 13, 2011, Ms. Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette was appointed a member of the Audit Committee to replace Mr. Jacquillat.Lamarche.

All of the members of the Committee are independent directors (see “— Directors and Senior Management — Director independence”, above) and have recognized experience in the financial and accounting fields.fields, as illustrated in their summary professional background (see“— Directors and Senior Management — Composition of the Board of Directors”, above).

The Committee is chaired by Ms. Barbizet.

At its meeting on July 28, 2011, the Board of Directors decided to appoint Ms. Barbizet to serve as the Audit Committee financial expert based on a recommendation by the Audit Committee.

At its meeting on January 12, 2012, the Board of Directors decided to co-opt Mr. Gérard Lamarche as a director and to nominate him as a member of the Audit Committee in replacement of Mr. de Rudder, who is resigning from his position as a Director.

Compensation Committee

The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Compensation Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors on February 9, 2012, is available herein:

Rules of procedure (unabridged version)

The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” and, collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries, as the “Group”) has approved the following rules of procedure of the Company’s Compensation Committee (hereafter, the “Committee”).

The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.

The Committee is focused on:

 

o

examining the executive compensation policies implemented by the Group and the compensation of members of the Executive Committee;

o

evaluating the performance and recommending the compensation of each corporate executive officer,director; and

o

preparing reports which the Company must present in these areas.

I.Duties:The Committee’s duties include:

 

o

examining the main objectives proposed by the Company’s general management regarding compensation of the Group’s executive officers, including stock option and restricted share grant plans and equity-based plans, and advising on this subject;

o

presenting recommendations and proposals to the Board of Directors concerning:

compensation, pension and life insurance plans, in-kind benefits and other compensation (including severance benefits) for the executive directors of the Company; in particular, the Committee proposes compensation structures that take into account the Company’s strategy, objectives and earnings and market practices;

stock option and restricted share grants, particularly grants of restricted shares to the executive directors;

o 

compensation, pension and life insurance plans, in-kind benefits and other compensation (including severance benefits) for the corporate executive officers of the Company; in particular, the Committee proposes compensation structures that take into account the Company’s strategy, objectives and earnings and market practices,

stock option and restricted share grants, particularly grants of registered shares to the corporate executive officers;

examining the compensation of the members of the Executive Committee, including stock option and restricted share grant plans and equity-based plans, pension and insurance plans and in-kind benefits;

124TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

o

preparing and presenting reports in accordance with these rules of procedure;

o

examining, for the parts within its remit, reports to be sent by the Board of Directors or its Chairman to the shareholders;

o

preparing recommendations requested at any time by the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the general management of the Company regarding compensation.

II.Composition:The Committee is made up of at least three directors designated by the Board of Directors. A majority of the members must be independent directors.

Members of the Compensation Committee may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries, either directly or indirectly, any compensation other than: (i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or, if applicable, as members of another committee of the Company’s Board; (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment by the Company, or another Group company, which are not dependent upon future work or activities.

The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.

However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.

III.Organization of activities:The Committee appoints its Chairman and its secretary. The secretary is a Company senior executive.

The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.

The Committee meets at least twice a year. It meets on an as-needed basis through notice by its Chairman or by one-half of its members.

The Committee invites the Chairman of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as applicable, to present recommendations. Neither the Chairman nor the Chief Executive Officer may be present during the Committee’s deliberations regarding his own situation. If the Chairman of the Board is not the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Chief Executive Officer may not be present during the Committee’s deliberations regarding the situation of the Chairman of the Board.

While maintaining the appropriate level of confidentiality for its discussions, the Committee may request from the Chief Executive Officer to be assisted by any senior executive of the Company whose skills and qualifications could facilitate the handling of an agenda item.

If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external consultants.

The proposals made by the Committee to the Board of Directors are adopted by a majority of the members present at the Committee meeting. The Chairman of the Committee casts the deciding vote if an even number of Committee members is present at the meeting.

The Committee can adopt proposals intended for the Board of Directors without meeting if all the members of the Committee so agree and sign each proposal.

A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.

IV.Report:The Committee reports on its activities to the Board of Directors.

At the request of the Chairman of the Board, the Committee examines all draft reports of the Company regarding compensation of the executive officers or any other issues relevant to its area of expertise.

Members of the Compensation Committee in 20112013

In 2011, the Committee’s members were Messrs. Patrick Artus, Bertrand Collomb, Thierry Desmarest and Michel Pébereau. Messrs. Artus, Collomb and Pébereau are independent directors. Mr. Pébereau chairs the Committee.

The Compensation Committee is made up of five members: Messrs. Artus, Brock, Desmarest, Mandil and Pébereau. The Committee is chaired by Mr. Pébereau.

80% of the Committee members are independent directors, given that the Board of Directors considers Messrs. Artus, Brock, Mandil and Pébereau to be independent (see “— Directors and Senior Management — Director independence”, above).

At its meeting on February 9, 2012, the Board of Directors decided to change the composition of the Compensation Committee. As of this date, the Committee’s members are Messrs. Patrick Artus, Gunnar Brock, Thierry Desmarest, Claude Mandil and Michel Pébereau. Messrs. Artus, Brock, Mandil and Pébereau are independent directors.

NominatingGovernance & GovernanceEthics Committee

The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Governance & Ethics Committee (formerly Nominating & Governance Committee), as approved by the Board of Directors on March 27, 2013, is available herein:

Rules of procedure (unabridged version)

The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” and, collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries, as the “Group”) has approved the following rules of procedure of the Company’s Nominating and Governance & Ethics Committee (hereafter, the “Committee”).

The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.

The Committee is focused on:

 

o

recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as directors, so as to guarantee the scope of coverage of the Directors’ competencies and the diversity of their profiles;

o

recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as corporate executive officers;directors;

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.125


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

o

preparing the Company’s corporate governance rules and supervising their implementation; and

o

ensuring compliance with ethics rules and examining any questions referred to it by the Board or the Chairman of the Board, in particular questions related to ethics and situations of conflicting interests.

I.Duties:The Committee’s duties include:

 

o

presenting recommendations to the Board for its membership and the membership of its committees, and the qualification in terms of independence of each candidate for Directors’ positions on the Board of Directors;

o

proposing annually to the Board of Directors the list of directors who may be considered as “independent directors”;

o

examining, for the parts within its remit, reports to be sent by the Board of Directors or its Chairman to the shareholders;

o

assisting the Board of Directors in the selection and evaluation of the corporate executive officersdirectors and examining the preparation of their possible successors, including cases of unforeseeable absence;

o

recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as directors;

o

recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as membermembers of a Committee of the Board of Directors;

o

proposing methods for the Board of Directors to evaluate its performance, and in particular preparing means of regular self-assessment of the workings of the Board of Directors, and the possible assessment thereof by an external consultant;

o

proposing to the Board of Directors the terms and conditions for allocating directors’ fees and the conditions under which expenses incurred by the directors are reimbursed;

o

developing and recommending to the Board of Directors the corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;

examining any questions referred to it by the Board or the Chairman of the Board, in particular questions related to ethics and situations of conflicting interests;

o

preparing recommendations requested at any time by the Board of Directors or the general management of the Company regarding appointments or governance.governance;

o

examining the conformity of the Company’s governance practices with the recommendations of the Code of Corporate Governance adopted by the Company;

o

supervising and monitoring implementation of the Company’s ethics and compliance program and, in this respect, ensuring that the necessary procedures for updating the Group’s Code of Conduct are put in place and that this code is disseminated and applied; and

o

examining any questions related to ethics and situations of conflicting interests; and

o

examining changes in the duties of the Board of Directors.

II.Composition:The Committee is made up of at least three directors designated by the Board of Directors. A majorityAt least one half of the members must be independent directors.

Members of the Nominating & Governance Committee, other than the Company’s corporate executive officers,

Members of the Governance & Ethics Committee, other than the Company’s executive directors, may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries any compensation other than: (i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or, if applicable, as members of another committee of the Company’s Board; (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment by the Company, or another Group company, which are not dependent upon future work or activities.

The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.

However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.

III.Organization of activities:The Committee appoints its Chairman and its secretary. The secretary is a Company senior executive.

The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.

The Committee meets at least twice a year. It meets on an as-needed basis through notice by its Chairman or by one-half of its members.

The Committee invites the Chairman of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as applicable, to present recommendations. The executive directors, whether they are members of the Committee or invited to its meetings, may not be present at deliberations concerning their own situation.

While maintaining the appropriate level of confidentiality for its discussions, the Committee may request from the Chief Executive Officer to be assisted by any senior executive of the Company whose skills and qualifications could facilitate the handling of an agenda item.

The Chairman of the Group Ethics Committee, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, may appear before the Governance & Ethics Committee at any time. He reports to this Committee each year on his activities and on the results of the ethics program implemented by the Company.

If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external consultants.

The proposals made by the Committee to the Board of Directors are adopted by a majority of the members present at the Committee meeting. The Chairman of the Committee casts the deciding vote if an even number of Committee members is present at the meeting.

The Committee can make proposals to present recommendations. The corporate executive officers, whether they are members of the Committee or

invited to its meetings, may not be present at deliberations concerning their own situation.

While maintaining the appropriate level of confidentiality for its discussions, the Committee may request from the Chief Executive Officer to be assisted by any senior executive of the Company whose skills and qualifications could facilitate the handling of an agenda item.

If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external consultants.

The proposals made by the Committee to the Board of Directors are adopted by a majority of the members present at the Committee meeting. The Chairman of the Committee casts the deciding vote if an even number of Committee members is present at the meeting.

The Committee can adopt proposals intended for the Board of Directors without meeting if all the members of the Committee so agree and sign each proposal.

A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.

IV.Report:The Committee reports on its activities to the Board of Directors.

126TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Corporate Governance

Members of the NominatingGovernance & GovernanceEthics Committee in 20112013

In 2011, the Committee’s members were Messrs. Bertrand Collomb, Thierry Desmarest and Michel Pébereau. Messrs. Collomb and Pébereau are independent directors.

The Governance & Ethics Committee has five members: Messrs. Artus, Brock, Collomb, Desmarest and Mandil. The Committee is chaired by Mr. Desmarest. At its meeting on February 9, 2012, the Board of Directors decided to change the composition of the Nominating and Governance Committee. As of this date, the Committee’s members are Messrs. Patrick Artus, Gunnar Brock, Bertrand Collomb, Thierry Desmarest and Claude Mandil. Messrs. Artus, Brock, Collomb and Mandil are independent directors.

80% of the Committee members are independent directors, given that the Board of Directors considers Messrs. Artus, Brock, Collomb and Mandil to be independent (see “— Directors and Senior Management — Director independence”, above).

Strategic Committee

The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Strategic Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors on April 25, 2013, is available herein:

Rules of procedure (unabridged version)

The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.

I.Duties:To allow the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. to ensure the Group’s development, the Committee’s duties include:

 

o

examining the overall strategy of the Group proposed by the Company’s general management;

o

examining operations that are of particular strategic importance; and

o

reviewing competition and the resulting medium and long-term outlook for the Group.

II.Composition:The Committee is made up of at least five directors designated by the Board of Directors.

Members of the Committee may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries, either directly or indirectly, any compensation other than:

directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the Committee, or, if applicable, as members of another committee of the Company’s Board; and

Members of the Committee may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries, either directly or indirectly, any compensation other than: (i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or, if applicable, as members of another committee of the Company’s Board; (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment by the Company, or another Group company, which are not dependent upon future work or activities.

The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.

However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.

III.Organization of activities:The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company chairs the Committee. The Chairman appoints the Committee secretary, who may be the Secretary of the Board of Directors.

The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.

The Committee meets at least once a year and at the request of its Chairman, at least one-half of its members, or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Committee Chairman prepares the schedule of its meetings.

Directors who are not members of the Committee are free to participate in the Committee’s meetings. This voluntary participation entitles them to the same directors’ fees as those paid to the members of the Committee for attending meetings.

The Committee may meet with the Chief Executive Officer, and, if applicable, any acting Managing Director of the Company and consult with managers of operating or non-operating departments, as may be useful in performing its duties. The Chairman of the Committee [, if the latter

The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.

The Committee meets at least once a year and at the request of its Chairman, at least one-half of its members, or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Committee Chairman prepares the schedule of its meetings.

The Chairman of the Committee may invite other directors to participate in the Committee meetings based on the meeting agenda.

The Committee may meet with the Chief Executive Officer, and, if applicable, any Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the Company and consult with managers of operating or non-operating departments, as may be useful in performing its duties. The Chairman of the Committee, if he is not the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,] gives prior notice of such meeting to the Chief Executive Officer. In particular, the Committee is authorized to consult with the Vice President Strategy & Business Intelligence of the Company or the person delegated by the latter, by asking the Company’s Chief Executive Officer to call them to a meeting.

If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external consultants.

A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.

IV.Report:The Committee submits written reports to the Board of Directors regarding its work.

It periodically evaluates its performance based on these rules of procedure and, if applicable, offers suggestions for improving its performance.

Members of the Strategic Committee in 20112013

The Strategic Committee is made up of eight members: Mmes. Barbizet, Kux and Lauvergeon and Messrs. Margerie, Brock, Desmarest, Lamarche and Mandil. Mr. de Margerie chairs the Committee.

Three-fourths of the Committee members are independent directors, given that the Board of Directors considers Mmes. Barbizet, Kux and Lauvergeon and Messrs. Brock, Lamarche and Mandil to be independent (see “— Directors and Senior Management — Director independence”, above).

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.127


Item 6 - Employees and Share Ownership

EMPLOYEES AND SHARE OWNERSHIP

Employees

As of December 31, 2013, the Group had 98,799 employees belonging to 355 companies and subsidiaries located in 101 countries. Table below shows, at year-ends 2011, 2012 and 2013, the breakdown of employees by the following categories: gender, nationality, business segment, region and age bracket:

Group employees as of December 31,  2013   2012   2011 

Total number of employees

   98,799     97,126     96,104  

Women

   30.8%     30.0%     29.7%  

Men

   69.2%     70.0%     70.3%  

French

   33.4%     35.6%     36.1%  

Other nationalities

   66.6%     64.4%     63.9%  

Breakdown by business segment

               

Upstream

      

Exploration & Production

   17.1%     16.9%     16.7%  

Gas & Power

   1.1%     1.7%     1.7%  

Refining & Chemicals

      

Refining & Chemicals

   51.5%     52.5%     51.9%  

Trading & Shipping

   0.6%     0.6%     0.5%  

Marketing & Services

      

Marketing & Services

   21.5%     21.6%     21.6%  

New Energies

   6.7%     5.2%     6.2%  

Corporate

   1.5%     1.5%     1.5%  

Breakdown by region

            

Mainland France

   33.6%     36.0%     36.5%  

French overseas departments and territories

   0.4%     0.4%     0.4%  

Rest of Europe

   23.4%     23.5%     23.4%  

Africa

   10.0%     9.6%     9.6%  

North America

   6.6%     6.4%     6.8%  

South America

   9.6%     8.9%     7.5%  

Asia

   14.6%     13.2%     14.1%  

Middle East

   1.3%     1.3%     1.1%  

Oceania

   0.5%     0.5%     0.6%  

Breakdown by age bracket

               

< 25

   6.5%     5.7%     5.9%  

25 to 34

   29.1%     29.2%     30.0%  

35 to 44

   28.8%     28.5%     28.1%  

45 to 54

   23.1%     23.7%     24.0%  

> 55

   12.5%     12.9%     12.0%  

Between 2012 and 2013, the workforce increased by 1.7%. At year-end 2013, the country with the most employees after France was the United States, fllowed by China, Mexico and Germany.

The breakdown by gender and nationality of managers or equivalent positions (³ 300 Hay points) is as follows:

Breakdown of managers

or equivalent as of December 31,

  2013   2012   2011 

Total number of managers

   28,527     27,639     26,836  

Women

   23.9%     23.5%     23.1%  

Men

   76.1%     76.5%     76.9%  

French

   39.1%     40.7%     41.1%  

Other nationalities

   60.9%     59.3%     58.9%  

In 2013, the Worldwide Human Resources Survey covered 88,653 employees belonging to 149 subsidiaries:

Group included in WHRS  2013   2012   2011 

Employees surveyed

   88,653     80,003     73,654  

% of Group employees

   90%     82%     77%  

128TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Employees and Share Ownership

The breakdown of employees joining and leaving TOTAL is as follows:

As of December 31,  2013   2012   2011 

Total number hired on open-ended contracts

   10,649     9,787     9,295  

Women

   35.9%     31.0%     29.4%  

Men

   64.1%     69.0%     70.6%  

French

   10%     11.8%     12.8%  

Other nationalities

   90%     88.2%     87.2%  

The number of employees hired under open-ended contracts in 2013 in the consolidated companies increased by 8.8% compared with 2012. The regions in which the largest number of employees under open-ended contracts were hired were Latin America (30.5%), followed by Asia (26.7%) and Europe (25.1%), and the business segment that hired most was Refining & Chemicals (49.1%).

The consolidated Group companies also hired 4,326 employees on fixed-term contracts. Over 600,000 job applications were received by the subsidiaries covered by the WHRS.

As of December 31,  2013   2012   2011 

Departures excluding retirement/transfers/early retirement/ voluntary departures and expiry of short-term contracts

   6,779     8,324     6,892  

Death

   106     155     119  

Resignations

   4,040     4,946     4,332  

Redundancies/negotiated departures(a)

   2,495     3,006     2,199  

Negotiated departures (France)

   138     217     242  

Total departures/total employees

   6.9%     8.6%     7.2%  

(a)

The increase between 2011 and 2012 is principally due to the Committee’s members were Mmes. Patricia Barbizet, Barbara Kux and Anne Lauvergeon and Messrs. Christophe de Margerie, Thierry Desmarest, Gunnar Brock, Claude Mandil and Thierry de Rudder.

At its meeting on January 12, 2012, the Boardreduction of Directors decided to co-opt Mr. Gérard Lamarche as a director and to nominate him as a member of the Strategic Committee in replacement of Mr. de Rudder, who resigned from his position as a Director.

Mmes. Barbizet, Kux and Lauvergeon and Messrs. Brock, Mandil and Lamarche are independent directors.

As a reminder, directors who are not members of the Committee are free to participateemployees at SunPower (essentially in the Committee’s meetings.

Mr. Christophe de Margerie chairs the Committee.

Board of Directors practicesPhilippines).

Management form

On May 21, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to reunify the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and appoint the Chief Executive Officer to the duties of Chairman of the Board. This decision was made further to the work done by the Nominating & Governance Committee and in the best interests of the Company, taking into account the advantage of the unified management and the majority of independent directors appointed at the Committees, which ensures balanced authority.

The Board of Directors deemed that the unified management form was the most appropriate to the Group’s organization,modus operandi and business, and the specificities of the oil and gas sector. It respects the respective prerogatives of the various Company instances (Shareholders’ meeting, Board of Directors, general management).

Moreover, the Company by-laws and the respective rules of procedure of the Board of Directors and the Committees provide the guarantees required to implement best governance practices within a unified management framework. In particular, the by-laws allow the Board to nominate one or two Vice-Chairmen. They also state that the Board of Directors can be summoned by any means, even verbally, or at short notice in the event of an emergency, by the Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, or one third of the members, at any time and whenever the Company so requires. The rules of procedure of the Board of Directors also state that each Director is required to inform the Board of Directors of any conflicts of interest with the Company or with any other company in the Group, and to abstain from voting on the resolution in question, and even to refrain from taking part in the debate preceding the vote.

Performance and evaluation

At its meeting on February 10, 2011, the Board of Directors discussed its practices and made suggestions for improvement with respect to broadening criteria when benchmarking with other companies, and for a thorough

study of the Group’s opportunities in the energy sector. These proposals were implemented at the meeting of the new Strategic Committee and when the report of the meeting was presented to the Board of Directors.

At its meeting of February 9, 2012, the Board of Directors discussed its practices on the basis of a formal evaluation carried out by means of a detailed questionnaire completed by all of the directors. The responses were then submitted for examination by the Nominating & Governance Committee and summarized. It is this summary that was discussed by the Board of Directors.

The formal evaluation showed a generally positive opinion of the practices of the Board of Directors and the Committees, which highlighted that the improvements requested by the directors in 2011 had been made. The Board therefore stated that it was globally satisfied with its practices and suggested improvements mainly relating to more in-depth strategic reflection. This has already been put in place with the Strategic Committee, and work in this area will continue for the benefit of the Board of Directors and the Group.

EMPLOYEES AND SHARE OWNERSHIP

TOTAL believes that the relationship between its management and labor unions is, in general, satisfactory.

Arrangements for involving employees in the Company’s share capital

 

EmployeesEmployee incentive and profit-sharing agreements

The tables below set forth the number of employees, by division and geographic location, of the Group (fully consolidated subsidiaries) as of the end of the periods indicated:

On June 29, 2012, a new incentive and profit-sharing agreement was signed for fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014, concerning TOTAL S.A., Elf Exploration Production, Total Exploration Production France, CDF Énergie, Total Raffinage Marketing (newly named Total Marketing Services), Total Additifs et Carburants Spéciaux, Total Lubrifiants, Total Fluides, Totalgaz, Total Raffinage-Chimie, Total Petrochemicals France and Total Raffinage France. Under the terms of this agreement, the amount available for employee profit-sharing is determined based on the return on equity (ROE) performance of the Group, as well as on the trend of the Total Recordable Injury Rate (TRIR) in view of the objectives and thresholds set out for each business unit.

The amount of the special incentive and profit-sharing reserve to be distributed by all of the companies that signed the Group agreements for fiscal year 2013 would total approximately135 million.

 

    Upstream   Downstream   Chemicals   Corporate   Total 

2011

   23,563     29,423     41,665     1,453     96,104  

2010

   17,192     32,631     41,658     1,374     92,855  

2009

   16,628     33,760     44,667     1,332     96,387  

    France   Rest of Europe   Rest of the World   Total 

2011

   35,037     22,453     38,614     96,104  

2010

   35,169     24,931     32,755     92,855  

2009

   36,407     26,299     33,681     96,387  

TOTAL believes that the relationship between its management and labor unions is, in general, satisfactory.

Arrangements for involving employees in the Company’s share capital

Pursuant to agreements signed on March 15, 2002, as amended, the Group created a “Total Group Savings Plan” (PEGT), a “Partnership for Voluntary Wage Savings Plan” (PPESV, later becoming PERCO) and a “Complementary Company Savings Plan” (PEC) for employees of the Group’s French companies having adhered to these plans. These plans allow investments in a number of mutual funds including one invested in Company shares (“TOTAL

ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”). A “Shareholder Group Savings Plan” (PEG-A) has also been in place since November 19, 1999 to facilitate capital increases reserved for employees of the Group’s French and foreign subsidiaries covered by these plans.

Company savings plans

The various Company savings plans (PEGT, PEC) give the employees of French Group Companies belonging to these savings plans access to several collective investment funds (fonds communs de placement), including a fund invested in shares of the Company (“TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”).

The capital increases reserved for employees are conducted under PEG-A through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” fund for employees of the Group’s French subsidiaries and through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL CAPITALISATION” fund for the employees of foreign subsidiaries. In addition, U.S. employees participate in these operations through American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) and Italian employees (as well as German employees starting in 2011) may participate by directly subscribing to new shares at the Group Caisse Autonome in Belgium.

Pursuant to agreements signed on March 15, 2002 and their amendments, the Group created a “TOTAL Group Savings Plan” (PEGT) and a “Complementary Company Savings Plan” (PEC) for employees of the Group’s French companies having adhered to these plans. These plans allow investments in a number of mutual funds including one invested in Company shares (“TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”). A “Shareholder Group Savings Plan” (PEG-A) has also been in place since November 19, 1999 to facilitate capital increases reserved for employees of the Group’s French and foreign subsidiaries covered by these plans.

Company savings plans give employees of the Group’s French companies that adhere to these plans the ability to make discretionary contributions (which the companies of the Group may, under certain conditions, supplement) to the plans invested in the shares of the

Company. The companies of the Group made gross additional contributions (abondement) to various savings plans that totaled73.9 million in 2013.

Profit-sharing agreements

Under the June 26, 2009 profit-sharing agreements concerning ten Group companies, the amount available for employees profit-sharing is determined, when permitted by local law, based on the return on equity (ROE) performance of the Group.

Employee shareholding

The total number of TOTAL shares held by employees as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:

“TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”

 78,607,765

“TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL CAPITALISATION”

19,691,590

ELF PRIVATISATION N°1

929,494

Shares held by U.S. employees

454,305

Group Caisse Autonome (Belgium)

436,431

TOTAL shares from the exercise of the Company’s stock options and held as registered shares within a Company Savings Plan (PEE)(a)

3,293,822

Total shares held by employee shareholder funds

103,413,407

(a)Company savings plans.

As of December 31, 2011, the employees of the Group held, on the basis of the definition of employee shareholding contained in Article L. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code, 103,413,407 TOTAL shares, representing 4.37% of the Company’s share capital and 8.01% of the voting rights that could be exercised at a Shareholders’ Meeting on that date.

The management of each of the three collective investment funds mentioned above is controlled by a dedicated supervisory board, two-third of its members representing holders of fund units and one-third representing the Company. This board is responsible for reviewing the collective investment funds’ management report and annual financial statements as well as the financial, administrative and accounting management, exercising voting rights attached to portfolio securities, deciding contribution of securities in case of a public tender offer, deciding mergers, spin-offs or liquidations, and granting its

approval prior to changes in the rules and procedures of the collective investment fund in the conditions provided for by the rules and procedures.

These rules and procedures also stipulate a simple majority vote for decisions, except for decisions requiring a qualified majority vote of two-third plus one related to a change in a fund’s rules and procedures, its conversion or disposal, and decisions related to contribution of securities of the Elf Privatisation collective investment fund in case of a public tender offer.

For employees holding shares outside of the employee collective investment funds mentioned in the table above, voting rights are exercised individually.

Capital increase reserved for Group employees

At the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010,

By the seventeenth resolution of the Combined Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012, the shareholders delegated to the Board of Directors the authority to increase the share capital of the Company in one or more transactions and within a maximum period of twenty-six months from the date of the meeting, reserving subscriptions for such issuance to the Group Employees participating in a company savings plan.

At the same Shareholders’ Meeting, the shareholders also delegated to the Board of Directors powers to increase the share capital of the Company in one or more transactions and within a maximum period of eighteen months from the date of the meeting, in view of giving the employees of foreign subsidiaries similar advantages as those granted to employees covered by the seventeenth resolution.

Pursuant to these delegations, the Board of Directors, at its meeting on September 18, 2012 decided to proceed with a capital increase reserved for employees of the Group, including a standard subscription offer and a leveraged offer at the discretion of the employees, within the limit of 18 million shares with dividend rights as of January 1, 2012. This capital increase resulted in the subscription of 10,802,215 shares, each with a par value of2.50 at the unit price of30.70, the issuance of which was recognized on April 25, 2013.

The previous capital increase reserved for employees of the Group had been decided by the Board of Directors at its meeting on October 28, 2010 pursuant to the authorization of the Combined Shareholders’ Meeting on May 21, 2010 and had resulted in the subscription of 8,902,717 shares, each with a par value of2.50 at the unit price of34.80, the issuance of which had been recognized on April 28, 2011.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.129


Item 6 - Employees and Share Ownership

The capital increase reserved for employees approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting of September 18, 2012, was conducted under the PEG-A: (i) for employees of the Group’s French subsidiaries, through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” fund in the case of standard subscription and through the “TOTAL FRANCE CAPITAL+” fund in the case of subscription to the leveraged offer; and (ii) for employees of foreign subsidiaries, through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL CAPITALISATION” fund in the case of standard subscription and through the “TOTAL INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL” fund in the case of subscription to the leveraged offer. In addition, U.S. employees participated in this operation by directly subscribing to American Depositary Shares (ADS), and Italian and German employees by directly subscribing to new shares at the Group Caisse Autonome (in Belgium). In addition, employees in certain other countries benefited from the leveraged subscription offer by means of a dedicated vehicle.

The previous capital increases reserved for employees were conducted under the PEG-A through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” fund for employees of the Group’s French subsidiaries and through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL CAPITALISATION” fund for the employees of foreign subsidiaries. In addition, U.S. employees participated in these operations by directly subscribing to American Depositary Shares (ADS), and Italian employees (as well as German employees starting in 2011) by directly subscribing to new shares at the Group Caisse Autonome.

Capital increase from the global free share plan for employees of the Company in one or more transactions and within a maximum period of twenty-six months from the date of the meeting, reserving subscriptions for such issuance to the Group employees participating in a company

The Shareholders’ Meeting on May 16, 2008 authorized the Board of Directors to proceed with the free grant of Company shares to employees of the Group as well as to executive directors of the Company or Group companies, for a period of thirty-eight months, within the limit of 0.8% of the outstanding share capital at the date of the decision of the Board of Directors to grant such shares.

Pursuant to this authorization, the Board of Directors at its meeting on May 21, 2010 decided on the terms and conditions of the global plan of free TOTAL shares in favor of the employees of the Group and delegated to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company all powers necessary for implementing this plan.

To this end, on July 2, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Group acknowledged the issue and definitive grant of 1,366,950 common shares, each with a par value of2.50, to the designated beneficiaries in application of the grant conditions approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting of May 21, 2010.

Pension savings plan in accordance with

The September 29, 2004 Group agreement on the provisions of Articles L. 3332-2 and L. 3332-18 and following of the French Labor Code, and Articles L. 225-129-2, L. 225-129-6 and L. 225-138-1 of the French Commercial Code. The number of ordinary shares that are likely to be issued pursuant to this delegation of authority will not exceed 1.5% of the share capital outstanding on the date of the meeting of the Board of Directors at which a decision to proceed with an issuance is made.

Pursuant to this delegation of authority, the Board of Directors decided on October 28, 2010 to proceed with a capital increase of a maximum of 12 million shares reserved for retirement savings set up a Collective Retirement Savings Plan (PERCO). An amendment to this plan signed on April 15, 2011 provides for the additional contribution of credit transferred from the time-savings scheme to the PERCO (CET-PERCO gateway). An amendment to the plan signed on March 30, 2012 adjusted the management mechanisms of the PERCO in order to better secure retirement savings and extended the scope of the agreement to include Total Petrochemicals France, Total Raffinage-Chimie and Total Raffinage France.

Employee shareholding

The total number of TOTAL shares held directly or indirectly by the Group’s employees as of December 31, 2013, is as follows:

TOTAL employees in 2011, bearing dividends as of January 1, 2010. The Board of Directors decided to delegate the authority to set the subscription period to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE

82,067,730

On March 14, 2011, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer decided that the subscription period would be set from March 16 to April 1, 2011 and acknowledged that the subscription price per ordinary share would be set at34.80.

The subscription resulted in the issuance in 2011 of 8,902,717 TOTAL shares.ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL CAPITALISATION

21,879,234

TOTAL FRANCE CAPITAL+

2,505,002

TOTAL INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL

931,374

ELF PRIVATISATION N°1

817,988

Shares held by the administration and management bodiesU.S. employees

531,615

As of December 31, 2011, based on informationGroup Caisse Autonome (Belgium)

474,490

TOTAL shares from the membersexercise of the BoardCompany’s stock options and the share registrar, the members of the Board and the Group Executive Officersheld as registered shares within a Company Savings Plan

3,122,627

Total shares held by employees

(Management

112,330,060

As of December 31, 2013, the employees of the Group held, on the basis of the definition of employee shareholding set forth in Article L. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code, 112,330,060 TOTAL shares, representing 4.72% of the Company’s share capital and 8.63% of the voting rights that could be exercised at a Shareholders’ Meeting on that date.

The management of each of the five FCPEs (Collective investment funds) mentioned above is controlled by a dedicated Supervisory board, two-thirds of its members representing holders of fund units and one-third representing the company. The board is responsible for reviewing the Collective investment fund’s management report and annual financial statements, as well as the financial, administrative and accounting management of the fund, exercising voting rights attached to portfolio securities, deciding contribution of securities in case of a public tender offer, deciding mergers, spin-offs or liquidations, and granting its approval prior to changes in the rules and procedures of the Collective investment fund in the conditions provided for by the rules and procedures.

These rules and procedures also stipulate a simple majority vote for decisions, except for decisions requiring a qualified majority vote of two-thirds plus one related to a change in a fund’s rules and procedures, its conversion or disposal.

For employees holding shares outside of the employee collective investment funds mentioned in the table above, voting rights are exercised individually.

Shares held by the administration and management bodies

As of December 31, 2013, based on information from the members of the Board and the share registrar, the members of the Board and the Group’s Executive Officers (Management Committee and Treasurer) held a total of less than 0.5% of the share capital:

members of the Board of Directors (including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer): 330,080 shares;

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: 121,556 shares, and 65,242 shares in the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund; and

Management Committee (including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) and Treasurer: 742,544 shares.

 

Members of the Board of Directors (including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer): 317,306 shares;

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: 105,556 shares and 53,869 shares of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment plan;

Management Committee (including the Chief Executive Officer) and Treasurer: 572,527 shares.

By decision of the Board of Directors:

The Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer
130TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 6 - Employees and Share Ownership

By decision of the Board of Directors:

the executive directors are required to hold a number of shares of the Company equal in value to two years of the fixed portion of their annual compensation; and

members of the Executive Committee are required to hold a number of shares of the Company equal in value to two years of the fixed portion of their annual compensation.

  

equal in value to two years of the fixed portion of their annual compensation.

Members of the Executive Committee are required to hold a number of shares of the Company equal in value to two years of the fixed portion of their annual compensation. These shares have to be acquired within three years from the appointment to the Executive Committee.

The number of TOTAL shares to be considered includes:

directly held shares, whether or not they are subject to transfer restrictions; and

shares in collective investment funds invested in TOTAL shares.

Summary of transactions in the Company’s securities

The following table presents transactions, of which the Company has been informed, in the Company’s shares or related financial instruments carried out in 2011

The number of TOTAL shares to be considered includes:

directly held shares, whether or not they are subject to transfer restrictions; and

shares in the collective investment fund invested in TOTAL shares.

Summary of transactions in the Company’s securities

The following table presents transactions, of which the Company has been informed, in the Company’s shares or related financial instruments carried out in 2013 by the individuals concerned under paragraphs a) through c) of Article L. 621-18-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code:

Year 2013      Acquisition   Subscription   Transfer   Exchange   Exercise
of stock
options
 
Christophe de Margerie(a)  TOTAL shares                         
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   5,824.18                      

Philippe Boisseau(a)

  TOTAL shares                       9,000.00  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   7,438.61     417.88     7,517.69            
Yves-Louis Darricarrère(a)  TOTAL shares             9,000.00          29,700.00  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   13,305.46          23,799.69            
Patrick de La Chevardière(a)  TOTAL shares                       22,000.00  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   9,018.11     2,026.82     18,362.59            
Jean-Jacques Guilbaud(a)  TOTAL shares             4,925.00          21,120.00  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   9,377.80     353.00     22,406.86            
Patrick Pouyanné(a)  TOTAL shares                       8,000.00  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   7,414.36          6,828.66            

(a)

Including the related individuals in the meaning of the provisions of the Article R. 621-43-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code.

(b)

Collective investment funds (FCPE) primarily invested in Company shares.

 

Year 2011      Acquisition   Subscription   Transfer   Exchange   Exercise
of stock
options
 
Christophe de Margerie(a)  TOTAL shares             93,250          113,576  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   5,340.09                      

Michel Bénézit(a)

  TOTAL shares                         
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   626.95     13,341.83     6,828.94            

François Cornélis(a)

  TOTAL shares             9,000            
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   1,883.86     11,440.06     5,876.63            
Yves-Louis Darricarrère(a)  TOTAL shares             14,412          6,412  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   901.20     20,088.29     10,319.28            
Jean-Jacques Guilbaud(a)  TOTAL shares             29,163          29,163  
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   1,008.85     14,320.92     8,636.03            
Bertrand Jacquillat(a)(c)  TOTAL shares   300          33            
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)                         
Patrick de La Chevardière(a)  TOTAL shares                         
   Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE), and other related financial instruments(b)   756.08     14,998.66     7,587.71            
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.131


Item 7 - Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

 

(a)Including the related individuals in the meaning of the provisions of the Article R. 621-43-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code.
(b)Collective investment funds (FCPE) primarily invested in Company shares.
(c)Director and member of the Audit Committee until May 13, 2011.

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major shareholders

Holdings of major shareholders

The major shareholders of TOTAL as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are set forth in the table below.

Major shareholders

Holdings of major shareholders

For the purpose of this paragraph, major shareholders are defined as shareholders whose interest (in the share capital or voting rights) exceeds 5%. TOTAL’s major shareholders as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

    2013   2012   2011 
As  of December 31,  % of
share
capital
   % of
voting
rights
   %  of
theoretical
voting
rights
(a)
   % of
share
capital
   % of
voting
rights
   % of
share
capital
   % of
voting
rights
 

GBL-CNP in concert

   4.8     4.8     4.4     5.4     5.4     5.5     5.6  

of which Groupe Bruxelles Lambert(b)

   3.6     3.6     3.3     4.0     4.0     4.0     4.0  

of which Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille(b)

   1.2     1.2     1.1     1.4     1.4     1.5     1.6  

Group employees(c)

   4.7     8.6     7.9     4.4     8.1     4.4     8.0  

Treasury shares

   4.6          8.1     4.6          4.6       

of which TOTAL S.A.

   0.4          0.3     0.3          0.4       

of which Total Nucléaire

   0.1          0.2     0.1          0.1       

of which subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine(d)

   4.1          7.6     4.2          4.2       

Other shareholders(e)

   85.9     86.6     79.6     85.7     86.6     85.3     86.3  

of which holders of ADS(f)

   9.3     9.2     8.5     9.3     9.3     8.7     8.7  

 

   2011  2010  2009 
As of  December 31 % of
share
capital
  % of
voting
rights
  % of
theoretical
voting
rights
(a)
  % of
share
capital
  % of
voting
rights
  % of
share
capital
  % of
voting
rights
 

Groupe Bruxelles Lambert(b)(c)

  4.0    4.0    3.7    4.0    4.0    4.0    4.0  

Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille(b)(c)

  1.5    1.6    1.4    1.6    1.6    1.4    1.4  

BNP Paribas(b)

  0.2    0.2    0.1    0.2    0.2    0.2    0.2  

Group employees(b)(d)

  4.4    8.0    7.4    4.0    7.7    3.9    7.5  

Other registered shareholders (non-Group)

  1.7    2.8    2.6    1.4    2.5    1.4    2.4  

Treasury shares

  4.6        8.1    4.8        4.9      

of which TOTAL S.A.

  0.4        0.4    0.5        0.6      

of which Total Nucléaire

  0.1        0.2    0.1        0.1      

of which subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine

  4.2        7.6    4.2        4.2      

Other bearer shareholders

  83.6    83.5    76.7    84.0    84.0    84.2    84.5  

of which holders of ADS(e)

  8.7    8.7    8.0    8.0    8.0    7.5    7.6  
(a)

(a)Pursuant to articlePursuant to Article 223-11 of the AMF General Regulation, the number of theoretical voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares to which voting rights are attached, including treasury shares that are deprived of voting rights.
(b)Shareholders with an executive officer (or a representative of employees) or director serving as a director of TOTAL S.A.
(c)Groupe Bruxelles Lambert is a company controlled jointly by the Desmarais family and Frère-Bourgeois S.A., and for the latter mainly through its direct and indirect interest in Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille. In addition, Groupe Bruxelles Lambert and Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille declared their acting in concert.
(d)Based on the definition of employee shareholding pursuant to Article L. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code.
(e)American Depositary Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

As of December 31, 2011, the holdings of the major shareholders were calculated based on 2,363,767,313 shares, representing 2,368,716,634 voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings or 2,578,602,075 theoretical voting rights(1)including:

9,222,905 voting rights attached to the 9,222,905 TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A. that are deprived of voting rights;rights

(b)

Groupe Bruxelles Lambert is a company controlled jointly by the Desmarais family and

200,662,536 voting rights attached to Frère-Bourgeois S.A., and for the 100,331,268 TOTAL shares held bylatter mainly through its direct and indirect interest in Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille. In addition, Groupe Bruxelles Lambert and Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille have declared that they act in concert. Moreover, these companies have executive directors who serve on the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. subsidiaries that cannot be exercised at Shareholders’ Meetings.

(c)

For prior years,Based on the holdingsdefinition of employee shareholding pursuant to Article L. 225-102 of the major shareholders were establishedFrench Commercial Code. The Amundi Group, the holding company for Amundi Asset Management, which is the manager of the employee collective investment fund “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” (see below), filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC on the basisFebruary 11, 2014, declaring beneficial ownership of 2,349,640,931184,350,308 Company shares to which were attached 2,350,274,592 voting rights that could be exercised at the Shareholders’ Meeting, as of December 31, 2010,2013 (i.e., 7.8% of the Company’s share capital). The Amundi Group specified that it did not have sole voting or dispositive power over any of these shares, and that it had shared voting power over 73,373,788 of 2,348,422,884these shares to(i.e., 3.1% of the Company’s share capital) and shared dispositive power over all of these shares. Moreover, the employee representatives serve on the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.

(d)

Fingestval, Financière Valorgest and Sogapar.

(e)

Of which were attached 2,339,384,550 voting rights that could be exercised at1.53% held by registered shareholders (non-Group) in 2013.

(f)

American Depositary Shares listed on the Shareholders’ Meeting, as of December 31, 2009.New York Stock Exchange.

As of December 31, 2013, the holdings of the major shareholders were calculated based on 2,377,678,160 shares, representing 2,391,533,246 voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings, or 2,601,078,962 theoretical voting rights(1) including:

8,883,180 voting rights attached to the 8,883,180 TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A. that are deprived of voting rights; and

200,662,536 voting rights attached to the 100,331,268 TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A. subsidiaries that cannot be exercised at Shareholders’ Meetings.

For prior years, the holdings of the major shareholders were calculated on the basis of 2,365,933,146 shares to which 2,371,131,871 voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings were attached as of December 31, 2012, and 2,363,767,313 shares to which 2,368,716,634 voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings were attached as of December 31, 2011.

Identification of the holders of bearer shares

In accordance with Article 9 of its by-laws,

In accordance with Article 9 of its bylaws, the Company is authorized, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to identify the holders of securities that grant immediate or future voting rights at the Company’s Shareholders’ Meetings.

Temporary transfer of securities

Pursuant to legal obligations, any legal entity or individual (with the exception of those described in paragraph IV-3° of Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code) holding alone or together a number of shares representing more than 0.5% of the Company’s voting rights pursuant to one or several temporary transfers or similar operations as described by Article L. 225-126 of the French Commercial Code is required to inform the Company and the French Financial Markets Authority of the number of shares temporarily held no later than the third business day preceding the shareholders’ meeting

Pursuant to legal obligations, any legal entity or individual (with the exception of those described in paragraph IV-3 of Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code) holding alone or in concert a number of shares representing more than 0.5% of the Company’s voting rights pursuant to one or more temporary transfers or similar operations as described in Article L. 225-126 of the aforementioned code is required to notify the Company and the French Financial Markets Authority of the number of shares temporarily owned no later than the third business day preceding the Shareholders’ Meeting at midnight.

 

 

(1)

Pursuant to Article 223-11 of the AMF General Regulation, the number of theoretical voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares, including those shares held by the Group that are deprived of voting rights.

Declarations are to be e-mailed to the Company at: holding.df-shareholdingnotification@total.com.

Failing to declare such information, any share bought under any of the above described temporary transfer operations shall be deprived of voting rights at the relevant Shareholders’ Meeting and at any Shareholders’ Meeting that would be held until such shares are transferred again or returned.

Thresholds notifications

In addition to the legal obligation to inform the Company and the French Financial Markets Authority within four business days when thresholds representing 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 1/3, 50%, 2/3, 90% or 95% of the share capital or voting rights(1) are crossed (Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code), any individual or entity who directly or indirectly comes to hold a percentage of the share capital, voting rights or rights giving future access to the share capital of the Company which is equal to or greater than 1%, or a multiple of this percentage, is required to notify the Company within fifteen days by registered mail with return receipt requested, and declare the number of securities held.

In case the shares above these thresholds are not declared, any undeclared shares held in excess of the threshold may be deprived of voting rights at future Shareholders’ Meetings if, at that meeting, the failure to make a declaration is acknowledged and if one or more shareholders holding collectively at least 3% of the Company’s share capital or voting rights so request at that meeting.

All individuals and entities are also required to notify the Company in due form and within the time limits stated above when their direct or indirect holdings fall below each of the aforementioned thresholds.

Declarations are to be sent to the Vice President of the Investor Relations department in Paris.

Legal threshold notifications in 2011

Société Générale reported that it had passed:

on May 6, 2011, above the thresholds of 5% of the share capital and the voting rights of the Company, and that it held after crossing the thresholds 6.86% of the share capital and 6.29% of the voting rights of the Company;

on May 25, 2011, below the thresholds of 5% of the share capital and the voting rights of the Company, and that it held after crossing the thresholds 4.92% of the share capital and 4.50% of the voting rights of the Company.

Holdings above the legal thresholds

In accordance with Article L. 233-13 of the French Commercial Code, only one shareholder, Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille (CNP) and Groupe Bruxelles Lambert (GBL), acting in concert, holds 5% or more of TOTAL’s share capital at year-end 2011(2).

In addition, two known shareholders held 5% or more of the voting rights exercisable at TOTAL Shareholders’ Meetings at year-end 2011:

CNP jointly with GBL:

In the AMF notice No. 209C1156 dated September 2, 2009, CNP and GBL acting in concert declared that they held more than the threshold of 5% of the voting rights of TOTAL as of August 25, 2009 and held 127,149,464 TOTAL shares representing 127,745,604 voting rights,i.e. 5.42% of the share capital and 5.0009% of the theoretical voting rights(3) (based on a share capital of 2,347,601,812 shares representing 2,554,431,468 voting rights). To the Company’s knowledge, CNP, jointly with GBL, held, as of December 31, 2011, 5.52% of the share capital representing 5.53% of the voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings and 5.08% of the theoretical voting rights(3).

The collective investment fund (fonds commun de placement) “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”:

To the Company’s knowledge, the collective investment fund (fonds commun de placement) “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” held, as of December 31, 2011, 3.33% of the share capital representing 6.12% of the voting rights exercisable at a Shareholders’ Meeting and 5.62% of the theoretical voting rights(3).

Shareholders’ agreements

TOTAL is not aware of any agreements among its shareholders.

(1)

Pursuant to Article 223-11 of the AMF General Regulation, the number of voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares, including those shares held by the Group that are deprived of voting rights.

(2)

AMF notice No. 209C1156 dated September 2, 2009.

132TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 7 - Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

Notifications must be e-mailed to the Company at: holding.df-shareholdingnotification@total.com

If no notification is sent, any shares acquired under any of the above temporary transfer operations will be deprived of voting rights at the relevant Shareholders’ Meeting and at any Shareholders’ Meeting that may be held until such shares are transferred again or returned.

Thresholds notifications

(3)

Pursuant to Article 223-11 of the AMF General Regulation, the number of theoretical voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares, including those shares held by the Group that are deprived of voting rights.

Treasury shares

As of December 31, 2011, the Company held 109,554,173 TOTAL shares either directly or through its indirect subsidiaries, which represented 4.63% of the share capital, as

In addition to the legal obligation to inform the Company and the French Financial Markets Authority within four trading days of the date on which the number of shares (or securities similar to shares or voting rights pursuant to Article L. 233-9 of the French Commercial Code) held represents more than 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, one-third, 50%, two-thirds, 90% or 95% of the share capital or theoretical voting rights(1) (Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code), any individual or legal entity who directly or indirectly comes to hold a percentage of the share capital, voting rights or rights giving future access to the Company’s share capital which is equal to or greater than 1%, or a multiple of this percentage, is required to notify the Company, within fifteen days of the date on which each of the above thresholds is exceeded, by registered mail with return receipt requested, and indicate the number of shares held.

If notification is not given, the shares held in excess of the threshold for which notification should have been given are deprived of voting rights at Shareholders’ Meetings if, at a Meeting, the failure to give notification is acknowledged and if one or more shareholders holding collectively at least 3% of the Company’s share capital or voting rights so request at that Meeting.

Any individual or legal entity is also required to notify the Company in due form and within the time limits stated above when their direct or indirect holdings fall below each of the aforementioned thresholds.

Notifications must be sent to the Vice President of Investor Relations in Paris.

Legal threshold notifications in 2013

In AMF notice No. 213C1748 dated November 18, 2013, CNP and GBL acting in concert stated that they had fallen below, as of November 7, 2013, the 5% share capital and voting rights thresholds and that they held 118,764,036 TOTAL shares representing 119,511,734 voting rights,i.e., 4.99% of the share capital and 4.59% of the theoretical voting rights(1) (based on share capital of 2,377,196,179 shares representing 2,606,134,412 voting rights). CNP and GBL acting in concert had exceeded the 5% threshold on August 25, 2009 (AMF notice No. 209C1156).

Holdings above the legal thresholds

In accordance with Article L. 233-13 of the French Commercial Code, to TOTAL’s knowledge no shareholder held 5% or more of TOTAL’s share capital at year-end 2013.

As of December 31, 2012, CNP and GBL acting in concert held 5.36% of the share capital representing 5.37% of the voting rights.

In AMF notice No. 213C1748 dated November 18, 2013, CNP and GBL acting in concert stated that they had fallen below, as of November 7, 2013, the 5% share capital and voting rights thresholds and that they held 118,764,036 TOTAL shares representing 119,511,734 voting rights,i.e., 4.99% of the share capital and 4.59% of the theoretical voting rights(1) (based on share capital of 2,377,196,179 shares representing 2,606,134,412 voting rights). CNP and GBL acting in concert held more than 5% of the Group’s share capital from August 25, 2009 (AMF notice No. 209C1156 dated September 2, 2009).

To TOTAL’s knowledge, one known shareholder held 5% or more of the voting rights exercisable at TOTAL Shareholders’ Meetings at year-end 2013. As of December 31, 2013, the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund held 3.45% of the share capital representing 6.41% of the voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings and 5.89% of the theoretical voting rights(1).

Shareholders’ agreements

TOTAL is not aware of any agreements among its shareholders.

Treasury shares

As of December 31, 2013, the Company held 109,214,448 TOTAL shares either directly or through its indirect subsidiaries, which represented 4.59% of the share capital on that date. By law, these shares are also deprived of voting rights.

TOTAL shares held directly by the Company (treasury shares)

The Company held 9,222,905

The Company held 8,883,180 treasury shares as of December 31, 2011, representing 0.39% of the share capital, as of December 31, 2013, representing 0.37% of the share capital on that date.

TOTAL shares held directly by Group companies

As of December 31, 2013, Total Nucléaire, a Group company wholly-owned indirectly by TOTAL, held 2,023,672 TOTAL shares. As of December 31, 2013, Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval, indirect subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine, held 22,203,704, 4,104,000 and 71,999,892 TOTAL shares, respectively, representing a total of 98,307,596 shares. As of December 31, 2013, the Company held 4.22% of the share capital through its indirect subsidiaries.

Related party transactions

The Group’s main transactions with related parties (principally all the investments carried under the equity method) and the balances receivable from and payable to them are shown in Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In the ordinary course of its business, TOTAL enters into transactions with various organizations with which certain of its directors or executive officers may be associated, but no such transactions of a material or unusual nature have been entered into during the period commencing on January 1, 2011, and ending on March 27, 2014.

(1)

As of December 31, 2011, Total Nucléaire, a Group company wholly-owned indirectly by TOTAL held 2,023,672 TOTAL shares. As of December 31, 2011,

Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval, indirect subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine, held respectively 22,203,704, 4,104,000 and 71,999,892 TOTAL shares, representing a total of 98,307,596 TOTAL shares. As of December 31, 2011, the Company held through its indirect subsidiaries, 4.24%Pursuant to Article 223-11 of the share capital.

Related Party TransactionsAMF General Regulation, the number of theoretical voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares to which voting rights are attached, including treasury shares that are deprived of voting rights.

The Group’s main transactions with related parties (principally all the investments carried under the equity method) and the balances receivable from and payable to them are shown in Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In the ordinary course of its business,
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL enters into transactions with various organizations with which certain of its directors or executive officers may be associated, but no such transactions of a material or unusual nature have been entered into during the period commencing on January 1, 2009, and ending on March 23, 2012.S.A.133


Item 8 - Financial Information

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Statements and other supplemental information

See pages F-1 through F-97 for TOTAL’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and pages S-1 through S-18 for other supplemental information.

Legal or arbitration proceedings

There are no governmental, legal or arbitration proceedings, including any proceeding that the Company is aware of, threatened with or even pending (including the main legal proceedings described hereafter) that could have, or could have had during the last twelve months, a material impact on the Group’s financial situation or profitability.While it is not feasible to predict the outcome of the pending claims, proceedings, and investigations described below with certainty, management is of the opinion that their ultimate disposition should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.

 

Consolidated Statements and other supplemental information

See pages F-1 through F-96 for TOTAL’s Consolidated Financial Statements and pages S-1 through S-19 for other supplemental information.

Legal or arbitration proceedings

There are no governmental, legal or arbitration proceedings, including any proceeding that the Company is aware of, threatened with or even pending (including the main legal proceedings described hereafter) that could have a material impact on the Group’s financial situation or profitability. While it is not feasible to predict the outcome of the pending claims, proceedings, and investigations described below with certainty, management is of the opinion that their ultimate disposition should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.

Antitrust investigations

The principal antitrust proceedings in which the Group’s companies are involved are described below.

Refining & Chemicals segment:

As part of the spin-off of Arkema(1) in 2006, TOTAL S.A. and certain other Group companies granted to Arkema for a period of ten years a guarantee for potential monetary consequences related to antitrust proceedings arising from events prior to the spin-off. As of December 31, 2013, all public and civil proceedings covered by the guarantee were definitively resolved in Europe and in the United States. Despite the fact that Arkema has implemented since 2001 compliance procedures that are designed to prevent its employees from violating antitrust provisions, it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the relevant authorities could commence additional proceedings involving Arkema regarding events prior to the spin-off.

Marketing & Services segment:

o

The administrative procedure opened by the European Commission against TOTAL Nederland N.V and TOTAL S.A., as parent company, in relation to practices regarding a product line of the Marketing & Services segment, resulted in a condemnation in 2006 that became definitive in 2012. The resulting fine (20.25 million) and interest thereon were paid during the first quarter of 2013.

o

Following the appeal lodged by the Group’s companies are involved are described below.

against the European Commission’s 2008 decision fining Total Marketing Services an amount ofChemicals

As part of the spin-off of Arkema(1) in 2006, TOTAL S.A. or certain other Group companies agreed

to grant Arkema a guarantee for potential monetary consequences related to antitrust proceedings arising from events prior to the spin-off.

This guarantee covers, for128.2 million, in relation to practices regarding a period of ten years from the dateproduct line of the spin-off, 90% of amountsMarketing & Services segment, which the company had already paid, by Arkema related to (i) fines imposed by European authorities or European member-states for competition law violations, (ii) fines imposed by U.S. courts or antitrust authorities for federal antitrust violations or violations of the competition laws of U.S. states, (iii) damages awarded in civil proceedings related to the government proceedings mentioned above, and (iv) certain costs related to these proceedings. The guarantee related to anti-competition violations in Europe applies to amounts above a176.5 million threshold. On the other hand, the agreements provide that Arkema will indemnify TOTAL S.A. or any Group company for 10% of any amount that TOTAL S.A. or any Group company are required to pay under any of the proceedings covered by this guarantee, in Europe.

If one or more individuals or legal entities, acting alone or together, directly or indirectly holds more than one-third of the voting rights of Arkema, or if Arkema transfers more than 50% of its assets (as calculated under the enterprise valuation method, as of the date

(1)

Arkema is used in this section to designate those companies of the Arkema group whose ultimate parent company is Arkema S.A. Arkema became an independent company after being spun-off from TOTAL S.A. in May 2006.

of the transfer) to a third party or parties acting together, irrespective of the type or number of transfers, this guarantee will become void.

In the United States, civil liability lawsuits, forconcerning which TOTAL S.A. has been namedwas declared jointly liable as the parent company, are closedthe relevant European court decided during the third quarter of 2013 to reduce the fine imposed on Total Marketing Services to125.5 million without significant impact onmodifying the Group’s financial position.

In Europe, since 2006, the European Commission has fined companiesliability of the Group in its configuration prior to the spin-off an overall amount of385.47 million, of which Elf Aquitaine and/or TOTAL S.A. were held jointly liable for280.17 million, Elf Aquitaine being personally fined23.6 million for deterrence. These fines are entirely settled as of today.

As a result, since the spin-off, the Group has paid the overall amount of188.07 million(1), corresponding to 90% of the fines overall amount once the threshold provided for by the guarantee is deducted to which an amount of31.31 million of interest has been added as explained hereinafter.

The European Commission imposed these fines following investigations between 2000 and 2004 into commercial practices involving eight products sold by Arkema. Five of these investigations resulted in prosecutions from the European Commission for which Elf Aquitaine has been named as the parent company, and two of these investigations named TOTAL S.A. as the ultimate parent company of the Group.

TOTAL S.A. and Elf Aquitaine are contesting their liability based solely on their status as parent companies and appealed for cancellation and reformation of the rulings that are still pending before the relevant EU court of appeals or supreme court of appeals.

During the year 2011, four of the proceedingscompany. Appeals have evolved and are closed as far as Arkema is concerned:

-

In one of these proceedings, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has rejected the action of Arkema while the decisions of the European Commission and of the General Court of the European Union against the parent companies have been squashed. Consequently, this proceeding is definitively closed regarding Arkema as well as the parent companies.

-

In two other proceedings, previous decisions against Arkema and the parent companies have been upheld by the General Court of the European Union. While the parent companies have introduced an appeal before the CJEU, Arkema did not appeal to the CJEU.been lodged against this judgment.

-
o 

Finally, in a last proceeding, the General Court has decided to reduce the amount of the fine initially ordered against Arkema while, in parallel, it has rejected the actions of the parent companies that have remained obliged to pay the whole amount of the fine initially ordered by the European Commission. Arkema has accepted this decision while the parent companies have introduced an appeal before the CJEU.

WithIn the exceptionUnited Kingdom, a settlement took place in the third quarter of the31.31 million of interest charged by the European Commission2013 putting an end to the parent companies, which has been required to pay in accordance with the decision concerning the lastcivil proceeding referred hereinabove, the evolution of the proceedings during the year 2011 did not modify the global amount assumed by the Group in execution of the guarantee.

In addition, civil proceedingsinitiated against ArkemaTOTAL S.A., Total Marketing Services and other groups of companies, were initiated in 2009 and 2011, respectively, before the German and Dutch courts by third parties for alleged damages pursuant to two of the above mentioned legal proceedings. TOTAL S.A. was summoned to serve notice of the dispute before the German court. At this point, the probability to have a favorable verdict and the financial impacts of these proceedings are uncertain due to the number of legal difficulties they give rise to, the lack of documented claims and evaluations of the alleged damages.

Arkema began implementing compliance procedures in 2001 that are designed to prevent its employees from violating antitrust provisions. However, it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the relevant authorities could commence additional proceedings involving Arkema regarding events prior to the spin-off, as well as Elf Aquitaine and/or TOTAL S.A. based on their status as parent company.

Within the framework of all of the legal proceedings described above, a17 million reserve remains booked in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011.

(1)This amount does not take into account a case that led to Arkema, prior to Arkema’s spin-off from TOTAL, and Elf Aquitaine being fined jointly45 million and Arkema being fined13.5 million.

Downstream

Pursuant to a statement of objections received by Total Nederland N.V. and TOTAL S.A. (based on its status as parent company) from the European Commission, Total Nederland N.V. was fined20.25 million in 2006, for which TOTAL S.A. was held jointly liable for13.5 million. TOTAL S.A. appealed this decision before the relevant court and this appeal is still pending.

In addition, pursuant to a statement of objections received by Total Raffinage Marketing (formerly Total France) and TOTAL S.A. from the European Commission regarding another product line of the Refining & Marketing division, Total Raffinage Marketing was fined128.2 million in 2008, which has been paid, and for which TOTAL S.A. was held jointly liable based on its status as parent company. TOTAL S.A. also appealed this decision before the relevant court and this appeal is still pending.

In addition, civil proceedings against TOTAL S.A and Total Raffinage Marketing and other companies were initiated before U.K and Dutch courts by third parties for allegedalleging damages in connection with the prosecutions broughtpractices already sanctioned by the European CommissionCommission. A similar civil proceeding is pending in this case.the Netherlands. At this point,stage, the probabilityplaintiffs have not communicated the amount of their claim.

o

Finally, in Italy, in 2013, a civil proceeding was initiated against TOTAL S.A. and its subsidiary Total Aviazione Italia Srl before the competent Italian civil court. The plaintiff claims against TOTAL S.A., its subsidiary and other third parties, damages that it estimates to have a favorable verdictbe nearly908 million. This procedure follows practices that had been sanctioned by the Italian competition authority in 2006. The existence and the financial impacts of these procedures are uncertain due to the number of legal difficulties they gave rise to, the lack of documented claims and evaluationsassessment of the alleged damages.

Within the framework of the legal proceedings described above, a30 million reserve is bookeddamages in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011.this procedure involving multiple defendants are strongly contested.

Whatever the evolution of the proceedings described above, the Group believes that their outcome should not have a material adverse effect on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.

Grande Paroisse

An explosion occurred at the Grande Paroisse industrial site in the city of Toulouse in France on September 21, 2001. Grande Paroisse, a former subsidiary of Atofina which became a subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine Fertilisants on December 31, 2004, as part of the reorganization of the Chemicals segment, was principally engaged in the production and sale of agricultural fertilizers. The explosion, which involved a stockpile of ammonium nitrate pellets, destroyed a portion of the site and caused the death of thirty-one people, including twenty-one workers at the site, and injured many others. The explosion also caused significant damage to certain property in part of the city of Toulouse.

This plant has been closed and individual assistance packages have been provided for employees. The site has been rehabilitated.

On December 14, 2006, Grande Paroisse signed, under the supervision of the city of Toulouse, a deed whereby it donated the former site of the AZF plant to the greater agglomeration of Toulouse (CAGT) and the Caisse des dépôts et consignations and its subsidiary ICADE. Under this deed, TOTAL S.A. guaranteed the site remediation obligations of Grande Paroisse and granted a10 million endowment to the InNaBioSanté research foundation as part of the setting up of a cancer research center at the site by the city of Toulouse.

After having articulated several hypotheses, the Court-appointed experts did not maintain in their final report filed on May 11, 2006, that the accident was caused by pouring a large quantity of a chlorine compound over ammonium nitrate. Instead, the experts have retained a scenario where a container of chlorine compound sweepings was poured between a layer of wet ammonium nitrate covering the floor and a quantity of dry agricultural nitrate at a location not far from the principal storage site. This is claimed to have caused an explosion which then spread into the main storage site. Grande Paroisse was investigated based on this new

(1)

Arkema is used in this section to designate those companies of the reorganization of the Chemicals segment, was principally engaged in the production and sale of agricultural fertilizers. The explosion, which involved a stockpile of ammonium nitrate pellets, destroyed a portion of the site and caused the death of thirty-one people, including twenty-one workers at the site, and injured many others. The explosion also caused

significant damage to certain property in part of the city of Toulouse.

This plant has been closed and individual assistance packages have been provided for employees. The site has been rehabilitated.

On December 14, 2006, Grande Paroisse signed, under the supervision of the city of Toulouse, the deed whereby it donated the former site of the AZF plant to the greater agglomeration of Toulouse (CAGT) and theCaisse des dépôts et consignations and its subsidiary ICADE. Under this deed,Arkema group whose ultimate parent company is Arkema S.A. Arkema became an independent company after being spun-off from TOTAL S.A. guaranteed the site restoration obligations of Grande Paroisse and granted a10 million endowment to the InNaBioSanté research foundation as part of the setting up of a cancer research center at the site by the city of Toulouse.in May 2006.

Regarding the cause of the explosion, the hypothesis that the explosion was caused by Grande Paroisse through the accidental mixing of hundreds of kilos of a chlorine compound at a storage site for ammonium nitrate was discredited over the course of the investigation. As a result, proceedings against ten of the eleven Grande Paroisse employees charged during the criminal investigation conducted by the Toulouse Regional Court (Tribunal de grande instance) were dismissed and this dismissal was upheld on appeal. Nevertheless, the final experts’ report filed on May 11, 2006 continued to focus on the hypothesis of a chemical accident, although this hypothesis was not confirmed during the attempt to reconstruct the accident at the site. After having articulated several hypotheses, the experts no longer maintain that the accident was caused by pouring a large quantity of a chlorine compound over ammonium nitrate. Instead, the experts have retained a scenario where a container of chlorine compound sweepings was poured between a layer of wet ammonium nitrate covering the floor and a quantity of dry agricultural nitrate at a location not far from the principal storage site. This is claimed to have caused an explosion which then spread into the main storage site. Grande Paroisse was investigated based on this new hypothesis in 2006; Grande Paroisse is contesting this explanation, which it believes to be based on elements that are not factually accurate.

All the requests for additional investigations that were submitted by Grande Paroisse, the former site manager and various plaintiffs were denied on appeal after the end of the criminal investigation procedure. On July 9, 2007, the investigating judge brought charges against Grande Paroisse and the former plant manager before the criminal chamber of the Court of Appeal of Toulouse. In late 2008,
134TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest were summoned to appear in Court pursuant to a request by a victims

association. The trial for this case began on February 23, 2009, and lasted approximately four months.

On November 19, 2009, the Toulouse Criminal Court acquitted both the former Plant Manager, and Grande Paroisse due to the lack of reliable evidence for the explosion. The Court also ruled that the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest, Chairman and CEO at the time of the disaster, were inadmissible.

Due to the presumption of civil liability that applied to Grande Paroisse, the Court declared Grande Paroisse civilly liable for the damages caused by the explosion to the victims in its capacity as custodian and operator of the plant.

The Prosecutor’s office, together with certain third parties, has appealed the Toulouse Criminal Court verdict. In order to preserve its rights, Grande Paroisse lodged a cross-appeal with respect to civil charges.

The appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal of Toulouse was completed on March 16, 2012. The decision is expected on September 24, 2012.

A compensation mechanism for victims was set up immediately following the explosion.2.3 billion was paid for the compensation of claims and related expenses amounts. As of December 31, 2011, a21 million reserve was recorded in the Group’s consolidated balance sheet.Form 20-F 2013


Item 8 - Financial Information

hypothesis in 2006; Grande Paroisse is contesting this explanation, which it believes to be based on elements that are not factually accurate.

On July 9, 2007, the investigating magistrate brought charges against Grande Paroisse and the former Plant Manager before the Toulouse Criminal Court. In late 2008, TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest, Chairman and CEO at the time of the event, were summoned to appear in Court pursuant to a request by a victims association.

On November 19, 2009, the Toulouse Criminal Court acquitted both the former Plant Manager, and Grande Paroisse due to the lack of reliable evidence for the explosion. The Court also ruled that the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest were inadmissible.

Due to the presumption of civil liability that applied to Grande Paroisse, the Court declared Grande Paroisse civilly liable for the damages caused by the explosion to the victims in its capacity as custodian and operator of the plant.

The Prosecutor’s office, together with certain third parties, appealed the Toulouse Criminal Court verdict. In order to preserve its rights, Grande Paroisse lodged a cross-appeal with respect to civil charges.

By its decision of September 24, 2012, the Court of Appeal of Toulouse (Cour d’appel de Toulouse) upheld the lower court verdict pursuant to which the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest were determined to be inadmissible. This element of the decision has been appealed by certain third parties before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation).

The Court of Appeal considered, however, that the explosion was the result of the chemical accident described by the court-appointed experts. Accordingly, it convicted the former Plant Manager and Grande Paroisse. This element of the decision has been appealed by the former Plant Manager and Grande Paroisse before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), which has the effect of suspending their criminal sentences.

A compensation mechanism for victims was set up immediately following the explosion.2.3 billion was paid for the compensation of claims and related expenses amounts. A12.7 million reserve remains booked in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013.

Buncefield

On December 11, 2005, several explosions, followed by a major fire, occurred at an oil storage depot at Buncefield, north of London. This depot was operated by Hertfordshire Oil Storage Limited (HOSL), a company in which TOTAL’s UK subsidiary holds 60% and another oil group holds 40%.

The explosion caused injuries, most of which were minor injuries, to a number of people and caused property damage to the depot and the buildings and homes located nearby. The official Independent Investigation Board has indicated that the explosion was caused by the overflow of a tank at the depot. The Board’s final report was released on December 11, 2008. The civil procedure for claims, which had not yet been settled, took place between October and December 2008. The Court’s decision of March 20, 2009, declared TOTAL’s UK subsidiary liable for the accident and solely liable for indemnifying the victims. The subsidiary appealed the decision. The appeal trial took place in January 2010. The Court of Appeals, by a decision handed down on March 4, 2010, confirmed the prior judgment. The Supreme Court of United Kingdom has partially authorized TOTAL’s UK subsidiary to contest the decision. TOTAL’s UK subsidiary finally decided to

withdraw from this recourse due to settlement agreements reached in mid-February 2011.

The Group carries insurance for damage to its interests in these facilities, business interruption and civil liability claims from third parties. The provision for the civil liability that appears in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011, stands at80 million after taking into account the payments previously made.

The Group believes that, based on the information currently available, on a reasonable estimate of its liability and on provisions recognized, this accident should not have a significant impact on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.

In addition, on December 1, 2008, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the Environment Agency (EA) issued a Notice of prosecution against five companies, including TOTAL’s UK subsidiary. By a judgment on July 16, 2010, the subsidiary was fined £3.6 million and paid it. The decision takes into account a number of elements that have mitigated the impact of the charges brought against it.

Sinking of the Erika

Following the sinking in December 1999 of the Erika, a tanker that was transporting products belonging to one of the Group companies, theTribunal de grande instance of Paris convicted TOTAL S.A. of marine pollution pursuant to a judgment issued on January 16, 2008, finding that TOTAL S.A. was negligent in its vetting procedure for vessel selection, and ordering TOTAL S.A. to pay a fine of375,000. The Court also ordered compensation to be paid to those affected by the pollution from the Erika up to an aggregate amount of192 million, declaring TOTAL S.A. jointly and severally liable for such payments together with the Erika’s inspection and classification firm, the Erika’s owner and the Erika’s manager.

TOTAL has appealed the verdict of January 16, 2008. In the meantime, it nevertheless proposed to pay third parties who so requested definitive compensation as determined by the Court. Forty-two third parties have been compensated for an aggregate amount of171.5 million.

By a decision dated March 30, 2010, the Court of Appeal of Paris upheld the lower Court verdict pursuant to which TOTAL S.A. was convicted of marine pollution and fined375,000. However, the Court of Appeal ruled that TOTAL S.A. bears no civil liability according to the applicable international conventions and consequently ruled that TOTAL S.A. be not convicted.

TOTAL challenged the criminal law-related issues of this decision before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation).

To facilitate the payment of damages awarded by the Court of Appeal in Paris to third parties against Erika’s controlling and classification firm, the ship-owner and the ship-manager, a global settlement agreement was signed late 2011 between these parties and TOTAL S.A. under the auspices of the IOPC Fund. Under this global settlement agreement, each party agreed to the withdrawal of all civil proceedings initiated against all other parties to the agreement.

TOTAL S.A. believes that, based on the information currently available, the case should not have a significant impact on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.

Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee — Russian regions and Interneft

Blue Rapid, a Panamanian company, and the Russian Olympic Committee filed a claim for damages with the Paris Commercial Court against Elf Aquitaine, alleging a so-called non-completion by a former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine of a contract related to an exploration and production project in Russia negotiated in the early 1990s. Elf Aquitaine believed this claim to be unfounded and opposed it. On January 12, 2009, the Commercial Court of Paris rejected Blue Rapid’s claim against Elf Aquitaine and found that the Russian Olympic Committee did not have standing in the matter. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this decision. On June 30, 2011, the Court of Appeal of Paris dismissed as inadmissible the claim of Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee against Elf Aquitaine, notably on the grounds of the contract having lapsed. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this decision to the French Supreme Court.

In connection with the same facts, and fifteen years after the termination of the exploration and production contract, a Russian company, which was held not to be the contracting party to the contract, and two regions of the Russian Federation that the Russian Olympic Committee did not have standing in the matter. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this decision. On June 30, 2011, the Court of Appeal of Paris dismissed as inadmissible the claim of Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee against Elf Aquitaine, notably on the grounds of the contract’s termination. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this decision to the French Supreme Court.

In connection with the same facts, and fifteen years after the termination of the exploration and production contract, a Russian company, which was held not to be the contracting party to the contract, and two regions of the Russian Federation which were not even parties to the contract, have launched an arbitration procedure against the aforementioned former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine that was liquidated in 2005, claiming alleged damages of U.S.$22.4 billion. For the same reasons as those successfully adjudicated by Elf Aquitaine against Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee, the Group considers this claim to be unfounded as to a matter of law or fact. The Group has lodged a criminal complaint to denounce the fraudulent claim which the Group believes it is a victim of and, has taken and reserved its rights to take other actions and measures to defend its interests.

against the aforementioned former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine that was liquidated in 2005, claiming alleged damages of U.S.$22.4 billion. For the same reasons as those successfully adjudicated by Elf Aquitaine against Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee, the Group considers this claim to be unfounded as a matter of law and fact. The Group has lodged a criminal complaint to denounce the fraudulent claim of which the Group believes it is a victim, and has taken and reserved its rights to take other actions and measures to defend its interests.

Iran

In 2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) followed by the Department of Justice (DoJ) issued a formal order directing an investigation in connection with the pursuit of business in Iran by certain oil companies including, among others, TOTAL. The inquiry concerned an agreement concluded by the Company with consultants concerning gas fields in Iran and aimed at verifying whether certain payments made under this agreement would have benefited Iranian officials in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the Company’s accounting obligations.

In late May 2013, and after several years of discussions, TOTAL reached settlements with the U.S. authorities (a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the DoJ and a Cease and Desist Order with the SEC). These settlements, which put an end to these investigations, were concluded without admission of guilt and Exchange Commission (SEC) followed by the Department of Justice (DoJ) issued a formal order directing an investigation in connection with the pursuit of business in Iran, by certain oil companies including, among others, TOTAL.

The inquiry concerns an agreement concluded by the Company with a consultant concerning a gas field in Iran and aims to verify whether certain payments made under this agreement would have benefited Iranian officials in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the Company’s accounting obligations.

Investigations are still pending and the Company is cooperating with the SEC and the DoJ. In 2010, the Company opened talks with U.S. authorities, without any acknowledgement of facts, to consider an out-of-court settlement as it is often the case in this kind of proceeding.

Late in 2011, the SEC and the DoJ proposed to TOTAL out-of-court settlements that would close their inquiries, in exchange for TOTAL respecting a number of obligations, including the payment of a fine ($245.2 million) and civil compensation ($153 million) that occurred during the second quarter of 2013. The reserve of $398.2 million that was booked in the financial statements as of June 30, 2012, has been fully released. By virtue of these settlements, TOTAL also accepted to appoint a French independent compliance monitor to review the Group’s compliance program and to recommend possible improvements.

With respect to the same facts, TOTAL and its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who was President of the Middle East at the time of the facts, were placed under formal investigation in France following a judicial inquiry initiated in 2006. In late May 2013, the Prosecutor’s office recommended that the case be sent to trial. The investigating magistrate has not yet issued his decision.

At this point, the Company considers that the resolution of these cases is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s financial situation or consequences for TOTAL’s committing to a number of obligations and paying fines. As TOTAL was unable to agree to several substantial elements of the proposal, the Company is continuing discussions with the U.S. authorities. The Company is free not to accept an out-of-court settlement solution, in which case it would be exposed to the risk of prosecution in the United States.

In this same affair, a parallel judicial inquiry related to TOTAL was initiated in France in 2006. In 2007, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer was placed under formal investigation in relation to this inquiry, as the former President of the Middle East department of the Group’s Exploration & Production division. The Company has not been notified of any significant developments in the proceedings since the formal investigation was launched.

At this point, the Company cannot determine when these investigations will terminate, and cannot predict their results, or the outcome of the talks that have been initiated. Resolving these cases is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s financial situation or consequences on its future planned operations.

Libya

In June 2011, the SEC issued to certain oil companies — including, among others, TOTAL — a formal request for information related to their operations in Libya. TOTAL is cooperating with this non-public investigation.

In June 2011, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued to certain oil companies – including, among others, TOTAL – a formal request for information related to their operations in Libya. In April 2013, the SEC notified TOTAL of the closure of the investigation while stating that it does not intend to take further action as far as TOTAL is concerned.

Oil-for-Food Program

Several countries have launched investigations concerning possible violations related to the United Nations (UN) Oil-for-Food program

Several countries have launched investigations concerning possible violations related to the United Nations (UN) Oil-for-Food Program in Iraq.

Pursuant to a French criminal investigation, certain current or former Group Employees were placed under formal criminal investigation for possible charges as accessories to the misappropriation of Corporate assets and as accessories to the corruption of foreign public agents. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, formerly President of the Group’s Exploration & Production division, was also placed under

Pursuant to a French criminal investigation, certain current or former Group employees were placed under formal criminal investigation for possible charges as accessories to the misappropriation of corporate assets and as accessories to the corruption of foreign public agents. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, formerly President of the Group’s Exploration & Production division, was also placed under formal investigation in October 2006. In 2007, the criminal investigation was closed and the case was transferred to the Prosecutor’s office. In 2009, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the investigating judge that the case against the Group’s current and former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer not be pursued.

In early 2010, despite the recommendation of the Prosecutor’s office, a new investigating judge, having taken over the case, decided to indict
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.135


Item 8 - Financial Information

formal investigation in October 2006. In 2007, the criminal investigation was closed and the case was transferred to the Prosecutor’s office. In 2009, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the investigating magistrate that the case against the Group’s current and former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer not be pursued.

In early 2010, despite the recommendation of the Prosecutor’s office, a new investigating magistrate, having taken over the case, decided to indict TOTAL S.A. on bribery charges as well as complicity and influence peddling. The indictment was brought eight years after the beginning of the investigation without any new evidence being introduced.

In October 2010, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the investigating magistrate that the case against TOTAL S.A., the Group’s former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer not be pursued. However, by ordinance notified in early August 2011, the investigating magistrate on the matter decided to send the case to trial. On July 8, 2013, TOTAL S.A., the Group’s former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were cleared of all charges by the Criminal Court, which found that none of the offenses for which they had been prosecuted were established. On July 18, 2013, the Prosecutor’s office appealed the parts of the Criminal Court’s decision acquitting TOTAL S.A. and certain of the Group’s former employees. TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s acquittal issued on July 8, 2013 is irrevocable since the Prosecutor’s office did not appeal this part of the Criminal Court’s decision.

In October 2010, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the investigating judge that the case against TOTAL S.A., the Group’s current and former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer not be pursued. However, by ordinance notified in early August 2011, the investigating judge on the matter decided to send the case to trial. The hearings are expected in the first quarter of 2013.

The Company believes that its activities related to the Oil-for-Food program have been in compliance with this program, as organized by the UN in 1996. The Volcker report released by the independent investigating committee set up by the UN had discarded any bribery grievance within the framework of the Oil-For-Food program with respect to TOTAL.

Italy

As part of an investigation led by the Prosecutor of the Republic of the Potenza Court, Total Italia and certain Group’s employees are the subject of an investigation related to certain calls for tenders that Total Italia made for the preparation and development of an oil field. On February 16, 2009, as a preliminary measure before the proceedings go before the Court, the preliminary investigation judge of Potenza served notice to Total Italia

of a decision that would suspend the concession for this field for one year. Total Italia has appealed the decision by the preliminary investigation judge before the Court of Appeal of Potenza. In a decision dated April 8, 2009, the Court reversed the suspension of the Gorgoglione concession and appointed for one year,i.e.until February 16, 2010, a judicial administrator to supervise the operations related to the development of the concession, allowing the Tempa Rossa project to continue.

The criminal investigation was closed in the first half of 2010. The preliminary hearing judge, who will decide whether the case shall be returned to the Criminal Court to be judged on the merits, held the first hearing on December 6, 2010. The proceedings before the Judge of the preliminary hearing are still pending.

In 2010, Total Italia’s exploration and production operations were transferred to Total E&P Italia and refining and marketing operations were merged with those of Erg Petroli.

Dividend policy

The Company has paid dividends on its share capital in each year since 1946. Future dividends will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition and other factors. The payment and amount of dividends are subject to the recommendation of the Board of Directors and resolution by the Company’s shareholders at the annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

Until the payment of the 2010 dividend, the Company paid an interim dividend in November and the remainder after the Shareholders’ Meeting held in May of each year. Consequently, for 2010, an interim dividend of1.14 per share and the remainder of1.14 per share were paid respectively on November 17, 2010 and May 26, 2011.

On October 28, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to change its interim dividend policy and to adopt a new policy based on quarterly dividend payments, starting in 2011.

TOTAL paid three quarterly interim dividends for 2011:

As part of an investigation led by the Prosecutor of the Republic of the Potenza Court, Total Italia and certain Group employees were the subject of an investigation related to certain calls for tenders that Total Italia made for the preparation and development of an oil field. On February 16, 2009, as a preliminary measure before the proceedings went before the Court, the preliminary investigation judge of Potenza served notice to Total Italia of a decision that would have suspended the concession for this field for one year. Total Italia appealed the decision by the preliminary investigation judge before the Court of Appeal of Potenza. In a decision dated April 8, 2009, the Court reversed the suspension of the concession and appointed for one year,i.e., until February 16, 2010, a judicial administrator to supervise the operations related to the development of the concession, allowing the Tempa Rossa project to continue.

The criminal investigation was closed in the first half of 2010.

In May 2012, the Judge of the preliminary hearing decided to dismiss the charges against some of the Group’s employees and to refer the case for trial on a reduced number of charges. The trial started on September 26, 2012.

 

The Board of Directors decided on the first quarterly interim dividend on April 28, 2011, with an ex-dividend date on September 19, 2011 and a payment date on September 22, 2011;

The Board of Directors decided on the second quarterly interim dividend on July 28, 2011, with an ex-dividend date on December 19, 2011 and a payment date on December 22, 2011;

The Board of Directors decided on the third quarterly interim dividend on October 27, 2011, with an ex-dividend date on March 19, 2012 and a payment date on March 22, 2011.

For 2011, TOTAL plans to continue its dividend policy by proposing a dividend of2.28 per share at the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 11, 2012, including a remainder of0.57 per share, with an ex-dividend date on June 18, 2012, and a payment on June 21, 2012. This2.28 per share dividend is stable compared to the previous year.

Subject to the applicable legislative and regulatory provisions, and pending the approval by the Board of Directors for the interim dividends and by the shareholders at the Shareholders’ Meeting for the accounts and the final dividend, the ex-date calendar for the interim quarterly dividends and the final dividend for 2012 should be as follows:

1st interim dividend: September 24, 2012;Rivunion

2nd interim dividend: December 17, 2012;

On July 9, 2012, the Swiss Tribunal Fédéral (Switzerland’s Supreme Court) rendered a decision against Rivunion, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine, confirming a tax reassessment in the amount of CHF 171 million (excluding interest for late payment). According to the Tribunal, Rivunion was held liable as tax collector of withholding taxes owed by the beneficiaries of taxable services. Rivunion, in liquidation since March 13, 2002 and unable to recover the amounts corresponding to the withholding taxes in order to meet its fiscal obligations, has been subject to insolvency proceedings since November 1, 2012. On August 29, 2013, the Swiss federal tax administration lodged a claim as part

of the insolvency proceedings of Rivunion, for an amount of CHF 284 million, including CHF 171 million of principal as well as interest for late payment.

Total Gabon

On February 14, 2014, Total Gabon received a tax re-assessment notice from theMinistère de l’Economie et de la Prospectiveof the Gabonese Republic accompanied by a partial tax collection notice, following the tax audit of Total Gabon in relation to the years 2008 to 2010. The amount referred to in the above taxre-assessment notice is $805 million.

The partial tax collection procedure was suspended on March 5, 2014.

Total Gabon disputes the grounds for the re-assessment and the associated amounts. Total Gabon intends to take all actions necessary to assert its rights and protect its interests.

Kashagan

In Kazakhstan, the Atyrau Region Environmental Department (“ARED”) launched against the consortium developing the Kashagan field, in which TOTAL holds an interest of 16.81%, a procedure alleging non-compliance with environmental legislation related to gas emissions (flaring). ARED issued a claim on March 7, 2014, for an amount of approximately $737 million (KZT 134 billion), of which TOTAL’s share would be approximately $124 million (KZT 22.5 billion). The Kashagan project’s consortium disputes these allegations.

Dividend policy

The Company has paid dividends on its share capital in each year since 1946. Future dividends will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition and other factors. The payment and amount of dividends are subject to the recommendation of the Board of Directors and resolution by the Company’s shareholders at the annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

On October 28, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to change its interim dividend policy and to adopt a new policy based on quarterly dividend payments starting in 2011.

TOTAL paid three quarterly interim dividends for fiscal year 2013:

the first quarterly interim dividend of0.59 per share for fiscal year 2013, approved by the Board of Directors on April 25, 2013, was paid in cash on September 27, 2013 (the ex-dividend date was September 24, 2013);

the second quarterly interim dividend of0.59 per share for fiscal year 2013, approved by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013, was paid in cash on December 19, 2013 (the ex-dividend date was December 16, 2013); and

the third quarterly interim dividend of0.59 per share for fiscal year 2013, approved by the Board of Directors on October 30, 2013, was paid in cash on March 27, 2014 (the ex-dividend date was March 24, 2014).

For fiscal year 2013, TOTAL intends to continue its dividend policy. As a result, the Board of Directors proposes a dividend of2.38 per share (+1.7% compared to 2012) at the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 16, 2014, including a remainder of0.61 per share (+3.4% compared to the previous quarter), with an ex-dividend date on June 2, 2014 and a payment on June 5, 2014.

Subject to the applicable legislative and regulatory provisions, and pending the approval by the Board of Directors for the interim dividends and by the shareholders at the Shareholders’ Meeting for the accounts and the final dividend, the ex-date calendar for the interim quarterly dividends and the final dividend for fiscal year 2014 is expected to be as follows:

1st interim dividend: September 23, 2014;

3rd interim dividend: March 18, 2013;

136TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Items 8 - 9

2nd interim dividend: December 15, 2014;

remainder: June 24, 2013.

The provisional ex-dividend dates above relate to the TOTAL shares traded on the Euronext Paris.

Dividends paid to holders of ADRs will be subject to a charge by the Depositary for any expenses incurred by the Depositary in the conversion of euro to dollars. See “Item 10. Additional Information — Taxation”, for a summary of certain U.S. federal and French tax consequences to holders of shares and ADRs.

Significant changes3rd interim dividend: March 23, 2015; and

For a description of significant changes that have occurred since the date of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, which include descriptions of certain recent 2012

Remainder: June 8, 2015.

The provisional ex-dividend dates above relate to the TOTAL shares traded on the NYSE Euronext Paris.

Dividends paid to holders of ADRs will be subject to a charge by the Depositary for any expenses incurred by the Depositary in the conversion of euros to dollars. See “Item 10. Additional Information — Taxation”, for a summary of certain U.S. federal and French tax consequences to holders of shares and ADRs.

Significant changes

On February 4, 2014, TOTAL signed an agreement to sell its 15% interest in the offshore Block 15/06 in Angola to Sonangol E&P. The amount of the transaction was $750 million and is subject to approval by the authorities.

The accounting effects of this sale, which occurred after the close of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 by TOTAL’s Board of Directors, will be reflected in TOTAL S.A.’s intermediate consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of 2014.

This information supplements the information provided in“Item 4. Business Overview” concerning the Group’s activities in Angola and in paragraph E) of Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

For a description of other significant changes that have occurred since the date of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, see “Item 4. Business Overview” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, which include descriptions of certain recent 2014 activities.

 

 

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

 

Markets

The principal trading market for the shares is the Euronext Paris exchange in France. The shares are also listed on Euronext Brussels and the London Stock Exchange.

Offer and listing details

Trading on Euronext Paris

Official trading of listed securities on Euronext Paris, including the shares, is transacted through French investment service providers that are members of Euronext Paris and takes place continuously on each business day in Paris from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. (Paris time), with a fixing of the closing price at 5:35 p.m. Euronext Paris may suspend or resume trading in a security listed on Euronext Paris if the quoted price of the security exceeds certain price limits defined by the regulations of Euronext Paris.

The markets of Euronext Paris currently settle and transfer ownership three trading days after a transaction (T+3). On January 14, 2014, Euronext announced its decision to shorten the standard settlement cycle from T+3 to T+2 for all securities. This migration is expected to take place on October 6, 2014. Highly liquid shares, including those of the Company, are eligible for deferred settlement (Service de Règlement Différé — SRD).

Payment and delivery for shares under the SRD occurs on the last trading day of each month. Use of the SRD service requires payment of a commission.

In France, the shares are included in the principal index published by Euronext Paris (the “CAC 40 Index”). The CAC 40 Index is derived daily by comparing the total market capitalization of forty stocks traded on Euronext Paris to the total market capitalization of the stocks that made up the CAC 40 Index on December 31, 1987. Adjustments are made to allow for expansion of the sample due to new issues. The CAC 40 index indicates trends in the French stock market as a whole and is one of the most widely followed stock price indices in France. In the UK, the shares are listed in both the FTSE Eurotop 100 and FTSEurofirst 300 index. As a result of the creation of Euronext, the shares are included in Euronext 100, the index representing Euronext’s blue chip companies based on market capitalization. The shares are also included in the Dow Jones Stoxx Europe 50 and Dow Jones Euro Stoxx 50, blue chip indices comprised of the fifty most highly capitalized and most actively traded equities throughout Europe and within the European Monetary Union, respectively. Since June 2000, the shares have been included in the Dow Jones Global Titans 50 Index which consists of fifty global companies selected based on market capitalization, book value, assets, revenue and earnings.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low quoted prices in euros for the currently outstanding shares on Euronext Paris.

Price per share ()  High   Low 

2009

   45.785     34.250  

2010

   46.735     35.655  

2011

   44.550     29.400  

2012

   42.970     33.420  

First Quarter

   42.970     37.020  

Second Quarter

   39.400     33.420  

Third Quarter

   41.995     34.505  

Fourth Quarter

   40.110     36.925  

2013

   45.670     35.175  

First Quarter

   40.820     37.040  

Second Quarter

   40.400     35.175  

Third Quarter

   43.785     36.615  

September

   43.785     41.435  

Fourth Quarter

   45.670     41.050  

October

   45.670     42.050  

November

   45.140     43.440  

December

   44.700     41.050  

2014 (through February 28)

   47.030     41.310  

January

   44.745     41.650  

February

   47.030     41.310  

The markets of Euronext Paris settle and transfer ownership three trading days after a transaction (T+3). Highly liquid shares, including those of the Company, are eligible for deferred settlement (Service de Règlement Différé — SRD). Payment and delivery for shares under the SRD occurs on the last trading day of each month. Use of the SRD service requires payment of a commission. Under this system, the determination date for settlement on the following month occurs on the fifth trading day prior to the last trading day (inclusive) of each month.
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.137


Items 9 - 10

In France, the shares are included in the principal index published by Euronext Paris (the “CAC 40 Index”). The CAC 40 Index is derived daily by comparing the total market capitalization of 40 stocks traded on Euronext Paris to the total market capitalization of the stocks that made up the CAC 40 Index on December 31, 1987. Adjustments are made to allow for expansion of the sample due to new issues. The CAC 40 Index indicates trends in the French stock market as a whole and is one of the most widely followed stock price indices in France. In the UK, the shares are listed in both the FTSE Eurotop 100 and FTSEurofirst 300 index. As a result of the creation of Euronext, the shares are included in Euronext 100, the index representing Euronext’s blue chip companies based on market capitalization. The shares are also included in the Dow Jones Stoxx 50 and Dow Jones Euro Stoxx 50, blue chip indices comprised of the fifty most highly capitalized and most actively traded equities throughout Europe and within the European Monetary Union, respectively. Since June 2000, the shares have been included in the Dow Jones Global Titans Index which consists of fifty global companies selected based on market capitalization, book value, assets, revenue and earnings.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low quoted prices in euros for the currently outstanding shares on Euronext Paris.

Price per share ()  High   Low 

2007

   63.40     48.33  

2008

   59.50     31.52  

2009

   45.785     34.25  

2010

   46.735     35.655  

First Quarter

   46.735     40.050  

Second Quarter

   44.625     36.210  

Third Quarter

   41.000     35.655  

Fourth Quarter

   41.275     36.910  

2011

   44.550     29.400  

First Quarter

   44.550     39.710  

Second Quarter

   43.730     37.305  

Third Quarter

   40.895     29.400  

September

   34.820     29.400  

Fourth Quarter

   39.810     31.730  

October

   39.810     31.730  

November

   38.705     34.570  

December

   39.605     35.940  

2012 (through February 29)

   42.400     38.570  

January

   40.890     38.570  

February

   42.400     40.225  

 

Trading on the New York Stock Exchange

ADSs evidenced by ADRs have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since October 25, 1991. The Bank of New York Mellon serves as depositary with respect to the ADSs evidenced by ADRs traded on the New York

Stock Exchange. One ADS corresponds to one TOTAL share. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low prices quoted in dollars for the currently outstanding ADSs evidenced by ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange.

Price per ADR ($)  High   Low 

2007

   87.34     63.89  

2008

   91.34     42.60  

2009

   65.98     42.88  

2010

   67.52     43.07  

First Quarter

   67.52     54.01  

Second Quarter

   60.24     43.07  

Third Quarter

   54.14     44.43  

Fourth Quarter

   58.06     48.08  

2011

   64.44     40.00  

First Quarter

   62.31     52.61  

Second Quarter

   64.44     53.04  

Third Quarter

   58.25     40.00  

September

   49.79     40.00  

Fourth Quarter

   55.93     41.85  

October

   55.93     41.85  

November

   52.89     46.72  

December

   52.46     47.00  

2012 (through February 29)

   57.06     48.82  

January

   53.41     48.82  

February

   57.06     53.01  

ADSs evidenced by ADRs have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since October 25, 1991. The Bank of New York Mellon serves as depositary with respect to the ADSs evidenced by ADRs

traded on the New York Stock Exchange. One ADS corresponds to one TOTAL share. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low prices quoted in dollars for the currently outstanding ADSs evidenced by ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange.

Price per ADR ($)  High   Low 

2009

   65.98     42.88  

2010

   67.52     43.07  

2011

   64.44     40.00  

2012

   57.06     41.75  

First Quarter

   57.06     48.82  

Second Quarter

   52.50     41.75  

Third Quarter

   55.07     41.85  

Fourth Quarter

   52.77     46.99  

2013

   62.45     45.93  

First Quarter

   55.35     47.50  

Second Quarter

   52.05     45.93  

Third Quarter

   59.25     47.69  

September

   59.25     54.54  

Fourth Quarter

   62.45     56.17  

October

   62.45     57.61  

November

   61.01     58.15  

December

   61.50     56.17  

2014 (through February 28)

   64.97     56.03  

January

   60.49     56.50  

February

   64.97     56.03  

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

Memorandum and Articles of Association

Register information

TOTAL S.A. is registered with the Nanterre Trade and Companies Register under the registration number 542 051 180.

Objects and purposes

The Company’s purpose can be found in Article 3 of its bylaws (statuts). Generally, the Company may engage in all activities relating, directly or indirectly to: (i) the exploration and extraction of mining deposits, and in particular hydrocarbons, and the performance of industrial refining, processing, and trading of these materials, as well as their derivatives and by-products; (ii) the production and distribution of all forms of energy; (iii) the chemicals, rubber and health industries; (iv) the transportation and shipping of hydrocarbons and other products or materials relating to the Company’s business purpose; and (v) all financial, commercial, and industrial operations and operations relating to any fixed or unfixed assets and real estate, acquisitions of interests or holdings in any business or company that may relate to any of the above-mentioned purposes or to any similar or related purposes, of such nature as to promote the Company’s extension or its development.

distribution of all forms of energy; (iii) the chemicals, rubber and health industries; (iv) the transportation and shipping of hydrocarbons and other products or materials relating to the Company’s business purpose; and (v) all financial, commercial, and industrial operations and operations relating to any fixed or unfixed assets and real estate, acquisitions of interests or holdings in any business or company that may relate to any of the above-mentioned purposes or to any similar or related purposes, of such nature as to promote the Company’s extension or its development.

Director issues

Compensation

Directors receive attendance fees, the maximum aggregate amount of which, determined by the shareholders acting at a shareholders’ meeting, remains in effect until a new decision is made. The Board of Directors may apportion this amount among its members in whatever way it considers appropriate. In addition, the Board may also grant its Chairman compensation.

Directors receive attendance fees, the maximum aggregate amount of which, determined by the shareholders acting at a shareholders’ meeting, remains in effect until a new decision is made. The Board apportions attendance fees among its members in whatever way it considers appropriate. In particular, it may apportion to Directors who are members of the committees of the Board a larger share than the amount apportioned to other Directors.

Retirement

The number of directors of TOTAL who are acting in their own capacity or as permanent representatives of a legal entity and are over seventy years old may not exceed one-third of the number of directors in office at the end of the fiscal year. If such number of Directors of TOTAL who are acting in their own capacity or as permanent representatives of a legal entity and are over seventy years old may not exceed one-third of the number of Directors in office at the end of the fiscal year. If such proportion is exceeded, the oldest Board member is automatically deemed to have resigned. Directors who are the permanent representative of a legal person may not continue in office beyond their seventieth birthday.

The Company’s bylaws, as updated on December 31, 2013, provide that the duties of the Chairman of the Board automatically cease on his sixty-fifth birthday at the latest. However, the Board may appoint, for a term of office not to exceed two years, an individual from among its members who is older than sixty-five years of age and younger than seventy years of age as Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Currently, the duties of the Chairman of the Board automatically cease on his sixty-fifth birthday at the latest. At their meeting of May 15, 2009, the shareholders adopted an amendment of the bylaws pertaining to the rules relating to the nomination of the Chairman. The amendment allows the Board, as an exception to the currently applicable sixty-five year age limit, to appoint as Chairman of the Board for a period of up to two years a director who is more than sixty-five years old but less than seventy years old.

Shareholdings

Each director must own at least 1,000 shares of TOTAL during his or her term of office, except the director representing the employees shareholder who shall hold, either individually or through an investment trust governed by Article L.214-40 of the Monetary & Financial Code

(French FCPE), at least one share or a number of stocks in such investment trust

Each Director must own at least 1,000 shares of TOTAL during his or her term of office, except the Director representing the employee shareholders who must hold, either individually or through an investment fund governed by Article L. 214-40 of the Monetary and Financial Code (French Fonds Commun de Placement d’Entreprise, or FCPE), at least one share or a number of stocks in such investment fund amounting to at least one share.

Election

Directors are elected for a term of three years. In 2003,

The term of office for Directors is set by the shareholders acting in an ordinary shareholders’ meeting and may not exceed three years, subject to applicable law that may allow extension of the duration of a given term until the next ordinary shareholders’ meeting held to approve the financial statements.

138TOTAL amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for the election of one director to represent employee shareholders. This directorS.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 10 - Additional Information

In 2003, TOTAL amended its bylaws to provide for the election of one Director to represent employee shareholders. This Director was appointed for the first time at the shareholders’ meeting held on May 14, 2004.

Description of shares

The following is a summary of the material rights of holders of fully paid

The following is a summary of the material rights of holders of fully paid-up shares and is based on the bylaws of the Company and French Company Law as codified in Volume II (Livre II) of the French Commercial Code (referred to herein as the “French Company Law”). For more complete information, please read the bylaws of TOTAL S.A., a copy of which has been filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report.

Dividend rights

The Company may make dividend distributions to its shareholders from net income in each fiscal year, after deduction of the overhead and other social charges, as well as of any amortization of the business assets and of any provisions for commercial and industrial contingencies, as reduced by any loss carried forward from prior years, and less any contributions to reserves or amounts that the shareholders decide to carry forward. These distributions are also subject to the requirements of French Company Law and the Company’s bylaws.

Under French Company Law, the Company must allocate 5% of its net profitsprofit in each fiscal year to a legal reserve fund until the amount in that fund is equal to 10% of the nominal amount of its share capital.

The Company’s bylaws provide that its shareholders may decide to either allocate all or a part of any distributable profits among special or general reserves, to carry them forward to the next fiscal year as retained earnings, or to allocate them to the shareholders as dividends. The bylaws provide that the shareholders’ meeting held to approve the financial statements for the financial year may decide to grant an option to each shareholder between payment of the dividend in cash and payment in shares with respect to all or part of the dividend or interim dividends.

Under French Company Law, and except as otherwise provided by a provision of the bylaws, the Company must distribute dividends to its shareholderspro rata according to their shareholdings. Dividends are payable to holders of outstanding shares on the date fixed byat the shareholders’

meeting approving the distribution of dividends or, in the case of interim dividends, on the date fixed by the Company’s Board of Directors at the meeting that approves the distribution of interim dividends. Under French law, dividends not claimed within five years of the date of payment revert to the French State.

Voting rights

Each shareholder of the Company is entitled to the number of votes corresponding to the number of shares he or she possesses, or for which he or she holds proxies. According to French Company Law, voting rights may not be exercised in respect of fractional shares.

According to the Company’s bylaws, each registered share that is fully paidpaid-up and registered in the name of the same shareholder for a continuous period of at least two years is granted a double voting right after such two-year2-year period. UponIn the event of a capital increase by capitalization of reserves, profits or premiums on shares, a double voting right is granted to each registered share allocated for free to a shareholder relating toin connection with previously existing shares that already carry double voting rights. Any merger of the Company would have no effect on the double voting right,

which may be exercised within the absorbing company, if the latter’s articles of association have created a similar right. The double voting right is automatically canceled when the share is converted into a bearer share or when the share is transferred, unless thesuch transfer from registered share to registered share is due to inheritanceab intestat or testamentary inheritance, division of community property between spouses, or a donationinter vivosduring the lifetime of the shareholder to the benefit of a spouse or relatives eligible to inherit.

French Company Law limits a shareholder’s right to vote notably in the following circumstances:

 

shares held by the Company or by entities controlled by the Company under certain conditions, which cannot be voted;

shares held by shareholders making a contribution in-kind to the Company, which cannot be voted with respect to resolutions relating to such in-kind contributions; and

shares held by interested parties, which cannot be voted with respect to resolutions relating to such shareholders.

o

shares held by the Company or by entities controlled by the Company under certain conditions, which cannot be voted;

o

shares held by shareholders making a contribution in-kind to the Company, which cannot be voted with respect to resolutions relating to such in-kind contributions; and

o

shares held by interested parties, which cannot be voted with respect to resolutions relating to such shareholders.

Under the Company’s bylaws, the voting rights exercisable by a shareholder, directly, indirectly or by proxy, at any shareholders’ meeting are limited to 10% of the total number of voting rights attached to the shares on the date of such shareholders’ meeting. This 10% limitation may be increased by taking into account double voting rights held directly or indirectly by the shareholder or by proxy, provided that the voting rights exercisable by a shareholder at any shareholders’ meeting may never exceed 20% of the total number of voting rights attached to the shares.

According to the Company’s bylaws, thesethe above limitations on voting lapse automatically if any individual or entity acting

alone or in concert with an individual or entity, holdscomes to hold at least two-thirds of the total number of Company shares as a result of a tenderpublic offer for 100%all of the Company shares.

Liquidation rights

Liquidation rights

In the event the Company is liquidated, itsany assets remaining after payment of its debts, liquidation expenses and all of its other remaining obligations will first be distributed to repay the nominal value of the shares. After these payments have been made, any surplus will be distributedpro rata among the holders of shares based on the nominal value of their shareholdings.

Redemption provisions

The Company’s shares are not subject to any redemption provisions.

Sinking fund provisions

The Company’s shares are not subject to any sinking fund provisions.

Future capital calls

Shareholders are not liable to the Company for furtherfuture capital calls on their shares.

Preferential subscription rights

PreferentialAs provided by French Company Law, if the Company issues additional shares, or any equity securities or other specific kinds of additional securities carrying a right, directly or indirectly, to purchase equity securities issued by the Company for cash or cash equivalents, current shareholders will have preferential subscription rights

Holders of shares have preferential rights to subscribethese securities on apro rata basis for additional basis. A two-thirds majority of the present and represented shares issued for cash. Shareholdersat an

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.139


Item 10 - Additional Information

extraordinary shareholders’ meeting may vote to waive theirthe shareholders’ preferential subscription rights either individually or, under certain circumstances, aswith respect to any particular offering. French law requires a company’s board of directors and independent auditors to present reports that specifically named groupaddress any proposal to waive preferential subscription rights. The shareholders may also authorize at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting. meeting the allocation to the existing shareholders of a nontransferable priority right to subscribe for the new securities during a limited period of time. Shareholders may also waive their own preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular offering.

During the subscription period relating to a particular offering of shares, shareholders may transfer their preferential subscription rights that they have not previously waived.

Changes in share capital

Under French Company Law, the Company may increase its share capital only with the approval of its shareholders at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting (or with a delegation of authority from its shareholders). There are two methods to increase share capital: (i) by issuing additional shares, including the creation of a new class of securities and (ii) by increasing the nominal value of existing shares. The Company may issue additional shares for cash or for assets contributed in kind, upon the conversion of debt securities, or other securities giving access to its share capital, that it may have issued, by capitalization of its reserves, profits or issuance premiums or, subject to certain conditions, in satisfaction of its indebtedness.premiums.

Under French Company Law, the Company may decrease its share capital only with the approval of its shareholders at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting (or with a delegation of authority from its shareholders). There are two methods to reduce share capital: (i) by reducing the number of shares outstanding, and (ii) by decreasing the nominal value of existing shares. The conditions under which the share capital may be reduced will vary depending upon whether the reduction is attributable to losses. The Company may reduce the number of outstanding shares either by an exchange of shares or by the repurchase and cancellation of its shares. If the reduction is attributable to losses, shares are cancelledcanceled through offsetting the Company’s losses. Any decrease must meet the requirements of French Company Law, which states, among other things, that all the holders of shares in each class of shares must be treated equally, unless the affected shareholders otherwise agree.

Form of shares

The Company has only one class of shares, with a par value of2.50 per share. Shares may be held in either bearer or registered form. Shares traded on NYSE Euronext Paris are cleared and settled through Euroclear France. The Company may use any lawful means to identify holders of shares,securities that grant immediate or future voting rights, including a procedure known astitres au porteur identifiableaccording to which Euroclear France will, upon the Company’s request, disclose to the Company the name, nationality, address and number of shares held by each shareholder in bearer form. The information may only be requested by the Company and may not be communicated to third parties.

Holding of shares

Under French Company Law and since the “dematerialization” of securities, the ownership rights of shareholders are represented by book entries instead of share certificates (other than certificates

representing French securities, which are outstanding exclusively outside the territory of France and are not held by French residents). Registered shares are entered into an account maintained by the Company or by a representative that it has nominated by the Company, while shares in bearer form must be held in an account maintained by an accredited financial intermediary on the shareholder’s behalf.

For all shares in registered form, the Company maintains a share account with Euroclear France which is administered by BNP Paribas Securities Services. In addition, the Company maintains accounts in the name of each registered shareholder either directly or, at a shareholder’s request, through a shareholder’s accredited intermediary,

in separate accounts maintained by BNP Paribas Securities Services on behalf of the Company. Each shareholder’s account shows the name and number of shares held and, in the case of shares registered through an accredited financial intermediary, the fact that they are so held. BNP Paribas Securities Services, as a matter of course, issues confirmations to each registered shareholder as to shares registered in a shareholder’s account, but these confirmations do not constitute documents of title.

Shares held in bearer form are held and registered on the shareholder’s behalf in an account maintained by an accredited financial intermediary and are credited to an account at Euroclear France maintained by the intermediary. Each accredited financial intermediary maintains a record of shares held through it and will issue certificates of inscription for the shares that it holds. Transfers of shares held in bearer form only may be made through accredited financial intermediaries and Euroclear France.

Cancellation of treasury shares

After receiving shareholders’ authorization through aconvened at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting, the Board of Directors of the Company may cancel treasury shares owned by the Company in accordance with French Company Law up to a maximum of 10% of the share capital within any period of twenty-four months.

Description of TOTAL share certificates

TOTAL issued stock certificates (certificats représentatifs d’actions, “CRs”) as part of TOTAL share certificates

the public exchange offer in 1999 for PetroFina shares. The TOTAL share certificates areCR is a stock certificate provided for by French rules that is issued by Euroclear France. French law allows Euroclear France to create certificates representing French securities provided that these certificates areand intended to be outstandingcirculate exclusively outside the territory of France, and cannot be held by residents of France. Furthermore, TOTAL share certificatesthat may not be held by French residents. The CR is issued as a foreign residentphysical certificate or registered in France, either personally ora custody account, and it has the characteristics of a bearer security. The CR is freely convertible from a physical certificate into a security registered on a custody account and conversely. However, in compliance with the Belgian law of December 14, 2005 on the dematerialization of securities in Belgium, CRs may only be delivered in the form of a dematerialized certificate as from January 1, 2008, the effective date of the law. ING Belgique is the bank deposit, buthandling the payment of all coupons and rightsdetached from outstanding CRs.

No fees are applicable to the payment of coupons detached from CRs, except for any income or withholding taxes. The payment may be exercised in France.

Certificates for TOTAL shares are either in bearer form or registered in a securities trading account. Under Euroclear France regulations applicable to bearer stock certificates, TOTAL share certificates cannot be categorized as secondary securities, such as ADSs, issued by a foreign company to represent TOTAL shares.

TOTAL share certificates havereceived at the characteristicsteller windows of a bearer security, meaning they are:the following institutions:

 

negotiable outside France;

transmitted by delivery; and

fungible with TOTAL share certificates, which may be converted freely from bearer form to registration in an account.

All rights attached to TOTAL shares must be exercised directly by the bearer of the TOTAL share certificates.

ING Belgique, Avenue Marnix 24, 1000 Brussels, Belgium;

BNP Paribas Fortis, Montagne du Parc 3, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; and

KBC BANK N.V., Avenue du Port 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium.

 

 

140TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 10 - Additional Information

Share capital history

Share capital history since January 1, 2011

 

Fiscal 2009

July 30, 2009

Reduction of the share capital from5,929,520,185 to5,867,520,185, through the cancellation of 24,800,000 treasury shares, par value2.50.

January 1, 2010

Certification of the issuance of 1,414,810 new shares, par value2.50 per share, between January 1 and December 31, 2009, raising the share capital by3,537,025 from5,867,520,185 to5,871,057,210 (of which 934,780 new shares issued through the exercise of the Company’s stock options and 480,030 new shares through the exchange of 80,005 shares of Elf Aquitaine stock resulting from the exercise of Elf Aquitaine stock options and eligible for a guaranteed exchange for TOTAL shares).

Fiscal 2010

January 12, 2011

Certification of the issuance of 1,218,047 new shares, par value2.50, through the exercise of the Company’s stock options between January 1 and December 31, 2010, raising the share capital by3,045,117.50 from5,871,057,210 to5,874,102,327.50.

FiscalFor fiscal year 2011

  

April 28, 2011

  CertificationAcknowledgement of the subscription to 8,902,717 new shares, par value2.50 per share, as part of the capital increase reserved for Group employees approved by the Board of Directors on October 28, 2010, raising the share capital by22,256,792.50 from5,874,102,327.50 to5,896,359,120.

January 12, 2012

  CertificationAcknowledgement of the issuance of 5,223,665 new shares, par value2.50 per share, through the exercise of the Company’s stock options between January 1 and December 31, 2011, raising the share capital by13,059,162.50 from5,896,359,120 to5,909,418,282.50.

For fiscal year 2012

July 2, 2012

Acknowledgement of the issuance of 1,366,950 new shares, par value2.50 per share, as part of the global free TOTAL share plan to Group employees decided by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010, raising the share capital by3,417,375 from5,909,418,282.50 to5,912,835,657.50.

January 8, 2013

Acknowledgement of the issuance of 798,883 new shares, par value2.50 per share, through the exercise of stock options between January 1 and December 31, 2012, raising the share capital by1,997,207.50 from5,912,835,657.50 to5,914,832,865.

For fiscal year 2013

April 25, 2013

Acknowledgement of the issuance of 10,802,215 new shares, par value2.50 per share, as part of the capital increase reserved for Group employees approved by the Board of Directors on September 18, 2012, raising the share capital by27,005,537.50 from5,914,832,865 to5,941,838,402.50.

January 8, 2014

Acknowledgement of the issuance of 942,799 new shares, par value2.50 per share, through the exercise of stock options between January 1 and December 31, 2013, raising the share capital by2,356,997.50 from5,941,838,402.50 to5,944,195,400.

 

Authorized share capital not issued as of December 31, 2011

Authorized share capital not issued as of December 31, 2013

The following is a summary of the currently valid delegations and authorizations to increase share capital that have been granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting to the Board of Directors.

Seventeenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010

o

Thirteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012:

Delegation of authority granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting to the Board of Directors to increase the share capital by issuing common shares or other securities granting immediate or future rights to the Company’s share capital, maintaining shareholders’ pre-emptive subscription rights up to a maximum nominal amount of2.5 billion,i.e.i.e., 1 billion shares (delegation of authority valid for twenty-six months).

Furthermore, the maximum nominal amount of the debt securities granting rights to the Company’s share capital that may be issued pursuant to the seventeenththirteenth resolution and the eighteenth resolutionfourteenth and sixteenth resolutions (mentioned below) may not exceed10 billion, or their exchange value, on the date of issuance.

Eighteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010

o

Fourteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012:

Delegation of authority granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting to the Board of Directors to increase the share capital by issuing common shares or other securities granting immediate or future rights to the Company’s share capital, canceling shareholders’ pre-emptive subscription rights, including the compensation comprised of securities as part of a public exchange offer, provided that they meet the requirements of Article L. 225-148 of the French Commercial Code. This resolution grants the Board of Directors the authority to grant a priority period for shareholders to subscribe to these securities pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-135 of the French Commercial Code. The total amount of the capital increases without pre-emptive subscription rights likely tothat may occur immediately or in the future cannot exceed the nominal

amount of850 million,i.e., 340 million shares, par value2.50 (delegation of authority valid for twenty-six months). Furthermore, under the fifteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012, the Board is authorized, for each of the issuances made in connection with the fourteenth resolution, to increase the number of securities to be issued within the limit of the ceiling of 15% of the initial issuance (at the same price as the price fixed for the initial issuance) within the limit of the ceiling fixed under the fourteenth resolution. The nominal amount of the capital increases is counted against the maximum aggregate nominal amount of2.5 billion authorized by the seventeenththirteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010.11, 2012.

Furthermore, the maximum nominal amount of the debt securities granting rights to the Company’s share capital that may be issued pursuant to the above mentioned seventeenththirteenth and eighteenthfourteenth resolutions and the sixteenth resolution (mentioned below) may not exceed10 billion, or their exchange value, on the date of issuance.

Nineteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010

o

Sixteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012:

Delegation of power granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting to the Board of Directors to increase the share capital by issuing new ordinary shares or other securities granting immediate or future rights to the Company’s share capital as compensation of in-kind contribution granted to the Company, by an amount not exceeding 10% of the share capital outstanding at the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 21, 201011, 2012 (delegation of authority valid for twenty-six months). The nominal amount of the capital increases is counted against the maximum aggregate nominal amount of850 million authorized by the eighteenthfourteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010.11, 2012.

Twentieth resolutionFurthermore, the maximum nominal amount of the Shareholders’ Meeting helddebt securities granting rights to the Company’s share capital that may be issued pursuant to the above mentioned thirteenth, fourteenth and sixteenth resolutions may not exceed10 billion, or their exchange value, on May 21, 2010the date of issuance.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.141


Item 10 - Additional Information

o

Twelfth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2013:

Delegation of authority to the Board of Directors to complete capital increases reserved for employees participating in the Company Savings Plan (Plana company savings plan (Plan d’épargne d’entreprise)d’entreprise), up to a maximum amount equal toof 1.5% of the outstanding share capital on the date of the decision of the Board of Directors to proceed with the issue (delegation of authority valid for twenty-six months). It is, it being specified that the amount of the capital increase is counted against the maximum aggregate nominal amount of2.5 billion authorized by the thirteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 11, 2012. This delegation renders ineffective, up to the unused portion, the seventeenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010.11, 2012.

Given that the Board of Directors made use of this delegation of authority on October 28, 2010, under which 8,902,717 new TOTAL shares were issued in 2011, the authorized share capital not issued with respect to capital increases reserved for employees participating in a Company Savings Plan was66,384,480 as of December 31, 2011, representing 26,553,792 shares.

As a result of the use of the delegation authorizing capital increases reserved for employees decided bydelegations stipulated in the Boardseventeenth and eighteenth resolutions of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on October 28, 2010,May 11, 2012, which resulted in the issuance in 2013 of 10,802,215 shares, and given that the Board of Directors did not make use of the delegations of authority granted by the seventeenth, eighteenththirteenth, fourteenth and nineteenthsixteenth resolutions of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010,11, 2012, the

authorized capital not issued was2.482.47 billion as of December 31, 2011,2013, representing 991989 million shares.

Eleventh resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 13, 2011

o

Eleventh resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 13, 2011:

Authority to grant restricted outstanding or new TOTAL shares to employees of the Group and to executive officersdirectors up to a maximum of 0.8% of the share capital outstanding on the date of the meeting of the Board of Directors that approves the restricted share grants. In addition, the shares granted to the Company’s executive officersdirectors cannot exceed 0.01% of the outstanding share capital on the date of the meeting of the Board of Directors that approves the grants (authorization valid for thirty-eight months).

Pursuant to this authorization:

 

3,700,000 outstanding shares were awarded by the Board of Directors at its meeting on September 14, 2011, including 16,000 outstanding shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive.Executive Officer;

4,300,000 outstanding shares were awarded by the Board of Directors on July 26, 2012, including 53,000 outstanding shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

4,464,200 outstanding shares were awarded by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013, including 53,000 outstanding shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

As of December 31, 2011, 15,210,1382013, 6,557,225 shares, including 220,376115,767 to the Company’s corporate executive officersdirectors could therefore still be awarded pursuant to this authorization.

Twenty-first resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 21, 2010

o

Eleventh resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2013:

Authority to grant Company stock options reserved forto TOTAL employees and to executive and officersdirectors up to a maximum of 1.5%0.75% of the share capital outstanding on the date of the meeting of the Board of Directors that approves the stock option grant. In addition, the

options granted to the Company’s corporate executive officersdirectors cannot exceed 0.1%0.05% of the outstanding share capital on the date of the meeting of the Board of Directors that approves the grants (authorization valid for thirty-eight months).

Pursuant to this authorization:

4,925,000 stock options were awarded by the Board of Directors at its meeting on September 14, 2010, including 240,000 stock options to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;

1,600,000 stock options were awarded by the Board of Directors at its meeting on September 14, 2011, including 160,000 stock options to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Asauthorization, as of December 31, 2011, 28,931,5092013, 17,832,586 stock options, including 1,963,7671,188,839 to the Company’s corporate executive officers,directors, could still be awarded pursuant to this authorization.

awarded.

Seventeenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2007

o

Nineteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012:

Authority to cancel shares up to a maximum of 10% of the share capital of the Company existing as of the date of the operation within a twenty-four-month period. This authorization is effective until the Shareholders’ Meeting calledheld to approve the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2011.2016. The Board did not make use of this delegation of authority during fiscal year 2011.2012.

Based on 2,363,767,3132,377,678,160 shares outstanding on December 31, 2011,2013, the Company may, up until the conclusion of the Shareholders’ Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the fiscal year ending on December 31, 2011,2016, cancel a maximum of 236,376,731237,767,816 shares before reaching the cancellation threshold of 10% of share capital canceled during a twenty-four-month period.

Potential share capital as of December 31, 2013

Securities granting rights to TOTAL shares, through exercise or redemption, are TOTAL share subscription options amounting to 25,356,113 share subscription options as of December 31, 2013, divided into:

o

5,620,626 options for the plan awarded by the Board of Directors on July 18, 2006;

o

5,847,965 options for the plan awarded by the Board of Directors on July 17, 2007;

o

4,219,198 options for the plan awarded on October 9, 2008 by decision of the Board of Directors on September 9, 2008;

o

3,989,378 options for the plan awarded by the Board of Directors on September 15, 2009;

o

4,537,852 options for the plan awarded by the Board of Directors on September 14, 2010; and

o

1,141,094 options for the plan awarded by the Board of Directors on September 14, 2011.

In addition, the global free TOTAL share plan intended for all Group employees awarded by the Board of Directors at its meeting on May 21, 2010 is likely to result in the issuance of a maximum of 873,475 shares as of December 31, 2013.

The potential share capital (existing share capital plus rights and securities that could result in the issuance of new TOTAL shares, through exercise or redemption),i.e., 2,403,907,748 shares, represents 101.10% of the share capital as of December 31, 2013, on the basis of 2,377,678,160 TOTAL shares constituting the share capital as of December 31, 2013, 25,356,113 TOTAL shares that could be issued upon the exercise of TOTAL options, and 873,475 TOTAL shares that could be issued under a global free share plan.

142TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 10 - Additional Information

TOTAL shares held by the Company or its subsidiaries

As of December 31, 2013

Percentage of share capital held by TOTAL S.A.

0.37%

Number of shares held in portfolio

8,883,180

Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)

353

Market value of portfolio (M)(a)

396

Percentage of capital held by companies(b) of the Group

4.59%

Number of shares held in portfolio

109,214,448

Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)

3,379

Market value of portfolio (M)(a)

4,863

(a)

Based on a market price of44.53 per share as of December 31, 2013.

(b)

TOTAL S.A., Total Nucléaire, Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval.

Share buybacks

The Shareholders’ Meeting of May 17, 2013, after acknowledging the report of the Board of Directors, authorized the Board of Directors, in accordance with the provisions of Article L. 225-209 of the French Commercial Code and of European Regulation 2273 / 2003 of December 22, 2003, to buy and sell the Company’s shares as part of a share buyback program. The maximum purchase price was set at70 per share. The number of shares acquired may not exceed 10% of the share capital. This authorization was granted for a period of eighteen months and replaced the previous authorization granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012.

A resolution will be submitted to the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 16, 2014 to authorize trading in TOTAL shares through a share buyback program carried out in accordance with Article L. 225-209 of the French Commercial Code and European Regulation 2273 / 2003 of December 22, 2003.

Share buybacks and cancellations in 2013

Under the authorization granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 17, 2013, 4,414,200 TOTAL shares, each with a par value of2.50, were bought back by TOTAL S.A. in 2013,i.e., 0.19% of the share capital as of December 31, 2013(1). This buyback was completed at an average price of40.57 per share, for a total cost of approximately179.09 million, excluding transaction fees. This buyback is intended to cover the performance share grant plan approved by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013.

In addition, TOTAL S.A. did not cancel any shares in 2013.

Shares held in the name of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013

As of December 31, 2013, the Company held 8,883,180 treasury shares, representing 0.37% of TOTAL’s share capital. By law, the voting rights and dividend rights of these shares are suspended.

After taking into account the shares held by Group subsidiaries, which are entitled to a dividend but deprived of voting rights, the total number of TOTAL shares held by the Group as of December 31, 2013 was 109,214,448, representing 4.59% of TOTAL’s share capital, comprised of, on the one hand, 8,883,180

treasury shares, including 8,764,020 shares held to cover the performance share grant plans and 119,160 shares to be awarded under new share purchase option plans or new restricted share grant plans and, on the other hand, 100,331,268 shares held by subsidiaries.

For shares bought back to be allocated to Company or Group Employees pursuant to the objectives referred to in Article 3 of EC Regulation 2273 / 2003 of December 22, 2003, note that, when such shares are held to cover share purchase option plans that have expired or performance share grants that have not been awarded at the end of the vesting period, they will be allocated to new TOTAL share purchase option plans or restricted share grant plans that may be approved by the Board of Directors.

Transfer of shares during fiscal year 2013

3,591,391 TOTAL shares were transferred in 2013 following the final award of TOTAL shares under the restricted share grant plans.

Cancellation of Company shares during fiscal year 2011, 2012 and 2013

TOTAL S.A. did not cancel any shares in 2011, 2012 and 2013.

The Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012 authorized the Board of Directors to reduce the share capital on one or more occasions by canceling shares held by the Company up to a maximum of 10% of the share capital over a 24-month period. As a result, based on 2,377,678,160 shares outstanding on December 31, 2013, the Company may cancel a maximum of 237,767,816 shares before reaching the cancellation threshold of 10% of share capital canceled over a 24-month period.

Reallocation for other approved purposes during fiscal year 2013

Shares purchased by the Company under the authorization granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 17, 2013, or under previous authorizations, were not reallocated in 2013 to purposes other than those initially specified at the time of purchase.

Conditions for the buyback and use of derivative products

Between January 1, 2013 and February 28, 2014, the Company did not use any derivative products on the financial markets as part of the share buyback programs successively authorized by the Shareholders’ Meetings of May 11, 2012 and May 17, 2013.

Shares held in the name of the Company and its subsidiaries as of February 28, 2014

As of February 28, 2014, the Company held 8,883,005 treasury shares, representing 0.37% of TOTAL’s share capital. By law, the voting rights and dividend rights of these shares are suspended.

After taking into account the shares held by Group subsidiaries, which are entitled to a dividend but deprived of voting rights, the total number of TOTAL shares held by the Group as of February 28, 2014 was 109,214,273, representing 4.59% of TOTAL’s share capital, comprised of, on the one hand, 8,883,005 treasury shares, including 8,764,020 shares held to cover the performance share grant plans and 118,985 shares to be awarded under new share purchase option plans or new restricted share grant plans and, on the other hand, 100,331,268 shares held by subsidiaries.

(1)

Average share capital of year N = (share capital at December 31 N-1 + share capital at December 31 N)/2.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.143


Item 10 - Additional Information

Other issuesSummary table of transactions completed by the Company involving its own shares from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2014(a):

Shareholders’ meetings

Cumulative gross movementsOpen positions as of February 28, 2014
PurchasesSalesOpen purchase
positions
Open sales
positions

Number of shares

4,414,200Bought callsPurchasesSold callsSales

Maximum average maturity

Average transaction price ()

40.57

Average exercise price

Amounts ()

179,087,553

(a)

In compliance with the applicable regulations as of February 28, 2014, the period indicated begins on the day after the date used as a referencefor previously published information.

Moreover, 3,591,466 TOTAL shares were transferred between March 1, 2013 and February 28, 2014 following the final award of shares under the performance share grant plans.

As of February 28, 2014

Percentage of share capital held by TOTAL S.A.

0.37%

Number of shares held in portfolio(a)

8,883,005

Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)

353

Market value of the portfolio (M)(b)

418

Percentage of capital held by companies(c) of the Group

4.59%

Number of shares held in portfolio

109,214,273

Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)

3,379

Market value of the portfolio (M)(b)

5,136

(a)

TOTAL S.A. did not buy back any shares during the three trading days preceding February 28, 2014. As a result, TOTAL S.A. owns all the shares held in portfolio as of that date.

(b)

Based on a closing price of47.03 per share as of February 28, 2014.

(c)

TOTAL S.A., Total Nucléaire, Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval.

2014-2015 share buyback program

Objectives of the share buyback program:

o

reduce the Company’s capital through the cancellation of shares;

o

honor the Company’s obligations related to securities convertible or exchangeable into Company shares;

o

honor the Company’s obligations related to stock option programs or other share grants to the Company’s management or to employees of the Company or a Group subsidiary;

o

deliver shares (by exchange, payment or otherwise) in connection with external growth operations; and

o

stimulate the secondary market or the liquidity of the TOTAL share under a liquidity agreement.

i. Legal framework: Implementation of this share buyback program, which is in line with Article L. 225-209 et seq. of the French Commercial Code, Article 241-1 et seq. of the General Regulation of the French Financial Markets Authority, and the provisions of European Regulation 2273 / 2003 of December 22, 2003, is subject to approval by the TOTAL S.A. Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16, 2014 through the fourth resolution which reads as follows:

“Upon presentation of the report of the Board of Directors and certain information contained in the program description prepared in accordance with Article 241-1 et seq. of the General Regulation (règlement général) of the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés financiers) and pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-209 of the French Commercial Code, European Regulation 2273 / 2003 of December 22, 2003, and the General

Regulation of the French Financial Markets Authority, the Shareholders’ Meeting, voting under conditions for quorum and majority required for ordinary general meetings, hereby authorizes the Board of Directors, with the option tosub-delegate such powers under the conditions provided by law, to buy or sell shares of the Company as part of a share buyback program.

The purchase, sale or transfer of these shares can be completed by any means on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or over the counter, including through the purchase or sale of blocks of shares, under the conditions authorized by the relevant market authorities. These means include the use of any financial derivative instrument traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or over the counter and the implementation of option strategies.

These transactions may be carried out at any time, except during public offerings for the Company’s shares, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations.

The maximum purchase price is set at70 per share.

In case of a capital increase by capitalization of reserves and restricted share grants, and in case of a stock-split or a reverse-stock-split, this maximum price shall be adjusted by applying the ratio of the number of shares outstanding before the transaction to the number of shares outstanding after the transaction.

Pursuant to Article L. 225-209 of the French Commercial Code, the maximum number of shares that may be bought under this authorization may not exceed 10% of the total number of shares outstanding as of the date on which this authorization is used. Purchases made by the Company may under no circumstances result in the Company holding more than 10% of the share capital, either directly or indirectly through indirect subsidiaries.

144TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 10 - Additional Information

Of the 2,377,678,160 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013, the Company held 8,883,180 shares directly and 100,331,268 shares indirectly through its subsidiaries, for a total of 109,214,448. Under these circumstances, the maximum number of shares that the Company could buy back is 128,553,368 shares, and the maximum amount that the Company may spend to acquire such shares is8,998,735,760.

The purpose of this share buyback program will be to reduce the Company’s share capital or to allow the Company to fulfill its obligations related to:

o

securities convertible or exchangeable into Company shares,

o

share purchase option programs, restricted share grant plans, employee shareholding plans or company savings plans, or other share grants to management or employees of the Company or a Group company.

Share buybacks may also be motivated by any of the market practices allowed by the French Financial Markets Authority, namely, as of December 31, 2013:

o

the delivery of shares (by exchange, payment or otherwise) in connection with external growth, merger, spin-off or contribution operations, without exceeding the limit stipulated in Article L. 225-209, paragraph 6, of the French Commercial Code, for merger, spin-off or contribution operations; or

o

stimulation of the secondary market or the liquidity of the TOTAL share by an investment service provider under a liquidity agreement that complies with the ethics rules recognized by the French Financial Markets Authority.

This program may also be used by the Company to trade in its own shares, either on or off the market, for any other authorized purpose or permitted market practice, or any practice which may be authorized by applicable laws or regulations or permitted by the French Financial Markets Authority. In case of transactions for purposes other than those mentioned above, the Company will inform its shareholders in a press release.

Based on these purposes, the shares of the Company acquired through this program may be:

o

canceled up to the maximum legal limit of 10% of the total number of shares outstanding on the date of the operation, over a 24-month period;

o

granted free of charge to the Group’s employees and to management of the Company or Group companies;

o

delivered to recipients of the Company’s share purchase options having exercised such options;

o

sold to employees, either directly or through Company savings plans;

o

delivered to the holders of securities that grant such rights to receive such shares, either through redemption, conversion, exchange, presentation of a warrant or in any other manner; or

o

used in any other manner that is consistent with the purposes stated in this resolution.

While they are held by the Company, such shares will be deprived of voting rights and dividend rights.

This authorization is granted for an 18-month period from the date of this Meeting. It renders ineffective, up to the unused portion, the fourth resolution of the Combined Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2013.

The Board of Directors is hereby granted full powers, with the right to delegate such authority, to undertake all actions necessary or desirable to carry out the program or programs authorized by this resolution.”

The Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012 also authorized the Board of Directors to reduce the capital by canceling shares up to a maximum of 10% of the share capital over a 24-month period. This authorization was granted for five years and will expire after the Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016. This approval was drafted as follows: “Upon presentation of the report of the Board of Directors and the auditors’ special report, the Shareholders’ Meeting, voting under conditions for quorum and majority required for extraordinary general meetings, hereby authorizes the Board of Directors, in accordance with Article L. 225-209 et seq. of the French Commercial Code and Article L. 225-213 of the same Code, to reduce the share capital on one or more occasions by canceling shares within the legal limits.

The maximum number of shares that may be canceled under this authorization may not exceed 10% of the total number of shares outstanding, over a 24-month period, with this limit applying to a number of shares that will be adjusted, if necessary, to include transactions affecting the share capital subsequent to this Meeting.

The Shareholders’ Meeting hereby grants full powers to the Board of Directors, with the option to sub-delegate such powers under the conditions provided by law, to carry out such capital reductions based on its decisions alone, to decide on the number of shares to cancel within the limit of 10% of the total number of shares outstanding as of the transaction date, over a 24-month period, to decide on the conditions of the capital reduction operations and confirm their execution, to apply, where applicable, the difference between the buyback value of the shares and their par value to any reserves or premiums, to amend the by-laws accordingly, and to complete all necessary formalities related thereto.

This authorization is granted for five years and will expire after the Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016.”

ii. Conditions:

o

Maximum share capital to be purchased and maximum funds allocated to the transaction: The maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the authorization proposed to the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16, 2014 may not exceed 10% of the total number of shares outstanding, with this limit applying to an amount of the Company’s share capital that will be adjusted, if necessary, to include transactions affecting the share capital subsequent to this Meeting; purchases made by the Company may under no circumstances result in the Company holding more than 10% of the share capital, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries.

Before any share cancellation under the authorization given by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012, based on the number of shares

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.145


Item 10 - Additional Information

outstanding as of December 31, 2013 (2,377,678,160 shares), and given the 109,214,273 shares held by the Group as of February 28, 2014,i.e., 4.59% of the share capital, the maximum number of shares that may be purchased would be 128,553,543, representing a theoretical maximum investment of8,998,748,010 based on the maximum purchase price of70.

o

Conditions for buybacks: Such shares may be bought back by any means on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or over the counter, including through the purchase or sale of blocks of shares, under the conditions authorized by the relevant market authorities. These means include the use of any financial derivative instrument traded on a regulated market or over the counter and the implementation of option strategies, with the Company taking measures, however, to avoid increasing the volatility of its stock. The portion of the program carried out through the purchase of blocks of shares will not be subject to quota allocation, up to the limit set by this resolution. These shares may be bought back at any time in accordance with current regulations, except during public offerings for the Company’s shares.

o

Duration and schedule of the share buyback program: In accordance with the fourth resolution, which will be subject to approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16, 2014, the share buyback program may be implemented over an 18-month period following the date of this Meeting, and therefore expires on November 16, 2015.

Transactions carried out under the previous program: Transactions carried out under the previous program are listed in the special report of the Board of Directors on share buybacks.

Other issues

Shareholders’ meetings

French companies may hold either ordinary or extraordinary shareholders’ meetings. Ordinary shareholders’ meetings are required for matters that are not specifically reserved by law to extraordinary shareholders’ meetings: the election of the members of the Board of Directors, the appointment of statutory auditors, the approval of a management report prepared by the Board of Directors, the approval of the consolidated and statutory annual financial statements, the declaration of dividends and the issuance of bonds (if the bylaws so provide).share purchase programs. Extraordinary shareholders’ meetings are required for approval of amendments to a company’s bylaws, modification of shareholders’ rights, mergers, increases or decreases in share capital, including a waiver of preferential subscription rights, the creation of a new class of shares, the authorization of the issuance of investment certificates or securities convertible, exchangeable or redeemable into shares and for the sale or transfer of substantially all of a company’s assets.

The Company’s Board of Directors is required to convene an annual shareholders’ meeting for approval of the annual financial statements. This meeting must be held within six months of the end of the fiscal year. However, the presidentPrésident of theTribunal de Commerceof Nanterre, the local French commercial court, may grant an extension of this six-month period. The Company may convene other ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meetings

at any time during the year. Meetings of shareholders may be convened by the Board of Directors or, if it fails to call a meeting, by the Company’s statutory auditors or by a court-appointed

agent. A shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of the share capital, the employee committee or another interested party under certain exceptional circumstances, may request that the court appoint an agent. The notice of meeting must state the agenda for the meeting.

French Company Law requires that a preliminary notice of a listed company’s shareholders’ meeting be published in theBulletin des annonces légales obligatoires (“BALO”) at least thirty-five days prior to the meeting (or fifteen days in the eventif the Company is subject to a tender offer and the Company calls a shareholders’ meeting to approve measures, the implementation of which would be likely to cause such tender offer to fail). The preliminary notice must first be sent to the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés financiers) (“AMF”) with an indication of the date it is to be published in the BALO.

The preliminary notice must include notably the agenda of the meeting and the proposed resolutions that will be submitted to a shareholders’ vote.

One or more shareholders holding a certain percentage of the Company’s share capital determined on the basis of a formula related to capitalization may propose to add on the shareholders’ meeting’s agenda additionalnew resolutions to be submitted to a shareholders’ vote and/or matters without a shareholders’ vote (points), provided that the text of additionalthe new resolutions or matters (i) be received by the Company on at leastno later than the twenty-fifth day preceding the meeting (or at least the tenth day in the event the Company is subject to a tender offer and the Company calls a shareholders’ meeting to approve measures, that, if implemented,the implementation of which would be likely to cause such tender offer to fail). The demand, and (ii) be sent no later than the twentieth day after the publication date of the preliminary notice of the shareholders’ that are eligiblemeeting. Eligible shareholders’ request to require foradd new matters to the inscription of matters on the meetingmeeting’s agenda has to be duly motivated.

French Company Law also requires that the preliminary notice of a listed company’s shareholders’ meeting, as well as the additional resolutions and/or matters presented by the shareholders under the terms and conditions prescribed under French law, be published on the Company’s Web sitewebsite during a period starting at the latest on the twenty-first day prior to the meeting (or the fifteenth day in the event the Company is subject to a tender offer and the Company calls a shareholders’ meeting to approve measures, that, if implemented,the implementation of which would be likely to cause such tender offer to fail).

Notice of a shareholders’ meeting is sent by postal or electronic mail at least fifteen days (or six days in the event of shareholders’ meetings convened in the situation whereif the Company wasis subject to a tender offer to approve

measures, the implementation of which would be likely to cause such tender offer to fail) before the meeting to all holders of registered shares who have held their shares for more than one month. However, in the case where the original meeting was adjourned because a quorum was not met, this time period is reduced to ten days (or four days in the event of shareholders’ meetings convened in the situation whereif the Company wereis subject to a tender offer to approve measures, the implementation of which would be likely to cause such tender offer to fail).

Attendance and the exercise of voting rights at both ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meetings are subject to certain conditions. Pursuant to French Company Law, participation at shareholders’ meetings is subject to the condition that an entry of registration has been made, for the owner of registered shares, in

146TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 10 - Additional Information

the records maintained by the Company, or, for the owner of bearer shares, in the records of an authorized intermediary, in each case at 12:00 a.m. (Paris time) on the third trading day preceding the shareholders’ meeting. For the owner of bearer shares, the registration is evidenced by a certificate of participation (attestation de participation) issued by the authorized intermediary.

Subject to the above restrictions, all of the Company’s shareholders have the right to participate in the Company’s shareholders’ meetings, either in person or by proxy. Each shareholder may delegate voting authority to another shareholder, the shareholder’s spouse, or the companion with whom the shareholder has registered a civil partnership (PACS). Every shareholder may also delegate voting authority to any other individual or legal entity he or she may choose, provided, among other things, that a written proxy be provided to the Company. Shareholders may vote, either in person, by proxy, or by postal or electronic mail, and each is entitled to as many votes as he or she possesses or as many shares as he or she holds proxies for, subject to the voting rights limitations provided by the Company’s bylaws. If the shareholder is a legal entity, it may be represented by a legal representative. A shareholder may grant a proxy to the Company by returning a blank proxy form. In this last case, the chairman of the shareholders’ meeting may vote the shares in favor of all resolutions proposed or agreed to by the Board of Directors and against all others. The Company will send proxy forms to shareholders upon request. In order to be counted, proxies must be received at least three days prior to the shareholders’ meeting at the Company’s registered office or at another address indicated in the notice convening the meeting, or by 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the shareholders’ meeting for electronic proxy forms. Under French Company Law, shares held by the Company or by entities controlled directly or indirectly by the

Company are not entitled to voting rights. There is no requirement that a shareholder have a minimum number of shares in order to be able to attend or be represented at shareholders’ meetings.

Under French Company Law, a quorum requires the presence, in person or by proxy, including those voting by mail, of shareholders having at least 20% of the shares entitled to vote in the case of (i) an ordinary shareholders’ meeting, (ii) an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting where shareholders are voting on a capital increase by capitalization of reserves, profits or share premium, or (iii) an extraordinary generalshareholders’ meeting of shareholders convened in the situation whereif the Company is subject to a tender offer in order to approve an issuance of warrants allowing the subscription, at preferential conditions, of shares of the Company and the free allotment of such warrants to existing shareholders of the Company, the implementation of which would be likely to cause such tender offer to fail, or 25% of the shares entitled to vote in the case of any other extraordinary shareholders’ meeting. If a quorum is not present at any meeting, the meeting is adjourned. There is no quorum requirement when an ordinary shareholders’ meeting is reconvened, but the reconvened meeting may consider only questions that were on the agenda offor the adjourned meeting. When an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting is reconvened, the quorum required is 20% of the shares entitled to vote, except where the reconvened meeting is considering capital increases through capitalization of reserves, profits or share premium or an issuance of warrants allowing the subscription, at preferential conditions, of shares of the Company and the free allotment of such warrants to existing shareholders of the Company, the implementation of which would

be likely to cause such tender offer to fail. For these matters, no quorum is required at the reconvened meeting. If a quorum is not present at a reconvened meeting requiring a quorum, then the meeting may be adjourned for a maximum of two months.

At an ordinary shareholders’ meeting, approval of any resolution requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes of the shareholders present or represented by proxy. The approval of any resolution at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting requires the affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, except that (i) any resolution to approve a capital increase by capitalization of reserves profits, or share premium, or (ii) any resolution, in the situation whereif the Company is subject to a tender offer in order to approve an issuance of warrants allowing the subscription, at preferential conditions, of shares of the Company and the free allotment of such warrants to existing shareholders of the Company, the implementation of which would be likely to cause such tender offer to fail,

only requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast. Notwithstanding these rules, a unanimous vote is required to increase shareholders’ liabilities. Abstention from voting by those present or represented by proxy is counted as a vote against any resolution submitted to a vote.

As set forth in the Company’s bylaws, shareholders’ meetings are held at the Company’s registered office or at any other location specified in the written notice.

Requirements for temporary transfer of securities

French Company Law provides that any legal entity or individual (with the exception of those described in paragraph IV- 3°of Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code) holding alone or in concert a number of

shares representing more than 0.5% of the Company’s voting rights as a result of one or several temporary stock transfers or assimilated transactions within the meaning of Article L. 225-126 of the French Commercial Code is required to inform the Company and the AMF of the number of the shares that are temporarily possessed no later than the third business day preceding the shareholders’ meeting at midnight.

If such declaration is not made, the shares bought under any of the above described temporary stock transfers or assimilated transactions shall be deprived of their voting rights at the relevant shareholders’ meeting and at any shareholders’ meeting that would be held until such shares are transferred again or returned.

Ownership of shares by non-French persons

There is no limitation on the right of non-resident or foreign shareholders to own securities of the Company, either under French Company Law or under the bylaws of the Company.

Requirement for holdings exceeding certain percentages

French Company Law provides that any individual or entity, acting alone or in concert with others, that holds, directly or indirectly, more than 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 1/3, 50%, 2/3, 90% or 95% of the outstanding shares or of the voting rights(1)attached to the shares, or that increases or decreases its shareholding or voting rights by any of the above percentages must notify the Company by registered letter, with return receipt, within four businesstrading days of crossingexceeding any of the above-mentioned thresholds, of the number of shares and voting rights it holds. An individual or entity must also notify the AMF the self-

regulatory organization that has general regulatory authority over the French stock exchanges and whose members include representatives of French stockbrokers, within four trading days of crossingexceeding any of the above-mentioned thresholds. When a

(1)

For the purposes of shareholding threshold declarations, pursuant to Article 223-11 of the General Regulation of the AMF, voting rights are calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares, whether or not these shares would have rights at a shareholders’ meeting.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.147


Item 10 - Additional Information

shareholder exceeds such ownership thresholds, AMF rules also require disclosure of certain information relating to other financial instruments that could increase the shareholding of the individual or entity. In addition, every shareholder who, directly or indirectly, acting alone or in concert with others, acquires ownership or control of shares, representingFrench Company Law and AMF regulations impose additional reporting requirements on persons who acquire more than 10%, 15%, 20% or 25% of the Company’s share capitaloutstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company. These persons must notifyfile a report with the Companycompany and the AMF before the end of itsthe fifth trading day following the date they exceed the threshold. Such report, which the AMF makes public, sets forth the objectives the relevant shareholder intends to pursue during the next six months and shall indicate the requested information listed in Article 223-17 of the AMF General Regulations. Upon any change of intention within the six-month period following the filing of the report, the acquirer must file a new intentions report for the six months following such an acquisition.six-month period. Any shareholder who fails to comply with the above requirements (thresholds and intentions notifications) will have its voting rights in excess of such thresholds suspended for a period of two years from the date such shareholder complies with the notification requirements and may have all or part of its voting rights suspended for up to five years by the commercial court at the request of the Company’s Chairman, any of the Company’s shareholders or the AMF.

In addition, the Company’s bylaws provide that any person, whether a natural person or a legal entity, who comes to hold, directly or indirectly, 1% or more, or any multiple of 1%, of the Company’s share capital or voting rights or of securities that may give access to the Company’s share capital must notify the Company by registered letter with return receipt requested, within fifteen calendar days of crossingexceeding any such threshold. Failure to comply with these notification provisions will result in the suspension of the voting rights attached to the shares exceeding this 1%the threshold held by the shareholder which should have been declared if such failure is acknowledged at a shareholders’ meeting and if the deprivation of the exceeding voting rights is requested at such shareholders’ meeting by one or more shareholders together holding shares representing at least 3% of the share capital or voting rights.rights of the Company.

Any individual or legal entity whose direct or indirect holding of shares falls below each of the levels mentioned must also notify the Company in the manner and within the time limits set forth above.

Subject to certain limited exemptions, any person, or persons acting in concert, owning in excess of 1/330% of the share capital or voting rights of the Company must initiate a public tender offer for the balance of the share capital, voting rights and securities giving access to such share capital or voting rights.

Material Contracts

There have been no material contracts (not entered into in the ordinary course of business) entered into by members of the Group since March 23, 2010.26, 2012.

(1)

For purposes of shareholding threshold declarations, pursuant to Article 223-11 of the General Regulation of the AMF, voting rights are calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares, whether or not these shares would have rights to vote at a shareholders’ meeting.

Exchange Controls

Under current French exchange control regulations, no limits exist on the amount of payments that TOTAL may remit to residents of the United States. Laws and regulations concerning foreign exchange controls do require, however, that an accredited intermediary must handle all payments or transfer of funds made by a French resident to a non-resident.

Taxation

General

This section generally summarizes the material U.S. federal income tax and French tax consequences of owning and disposing of shares and ADSs of TOTAL to U.S. Holders that hold their shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. A U.S. Holder is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is (i) a citizen or resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (ii) a domestic corporation or other domestic entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (iii) an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust if a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

This section does not apply to members of special classes of holders subject to special rules, including:

 

dealers in securities;

traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings;

tax-exempt organizations;

life insurance companies;

persons liable for alternative minimum tax;

persons that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the share capital or voting rights in TOTAL;

persons that purchase or sell shares or ADSs as part of a wash sale for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

persons that hold the shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction; or

persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.

dealers in securities;

traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings;

tax-exempt organizations;

life insurance companies;

U.S. pension funds;

U.S. Regulated Investment Companies (RIC), Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT), and Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conducts (REMIC);

persons liable for alternative minimum tax;

persons that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the share capital or voting rights in TOTAL;

persons that purchase or sell shares or ADSs as part of a wash sale for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

persons that hold the shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction; or

persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.

If a partnership holds ordinary shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partners of a partnership holding these ordinary shares or ADSs should consult their tax advisors as to the tax consequences of owning or disposing of ordinary shares or ADSs, as applicable.

Under French law, specific rules apply to trusts, in particular specific new tax and filing requirements as well as modifications to wealth, estate and gift taxes as they apply to trusts. Given the complex nature of these new rules and the fact that their application varies depending on the status of the trust, the grantor, the beneficiary and the assets held in the trust, the following summary does not address the tax treatment of ADSs or shares held in a trust. If ADSs or shares are held in trust, the grantor, trustee and beneficiary are urged to consult their own tax adviser regarding the specific tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of ADSs or shares.

In addition, the discussion of the material French tax consequences is limited to U.S. Holders that (i) are residents of the United States for purposes of the Treaty (as defined below), (ii) do not maintain a permanent establishment or fixed base in France to which the shares or ADSs are attributable and through which the respective U.S. Holders carry on, or have carried on, a business (or, if the holder is an individual, performs or has performed independent personal services), and (iii) are otherwise eligible for the benefits of the Treaty in respect of income and gain from the

148TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 10 - Additional Information

shares or ADSs. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of the Depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.

This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“IRC”), as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions, and with respect to the description of the material French tax consequences, the laws of the Republic of France and French tax regulations, all as currently in effect, as well as on the Convention Between the United States and the Republic of France for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and Capital dated August 31, 1994 as amended (the “Treaty”). These laws, regulations and the Treaty are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis.

This discussion is intended only as a descriptive summary and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential tax effects of the ownership or disposition of the shares and ADSs and is not intended to substitute competent professional advice. Individual situations of holders of shares and ADSs may vary from the description made below. The following summary does not address the French tax treatment applicable to dividends transferred topaid in so-called “Non Cooperative Countries and Territories” (“NCCT”) within the meaning of Section 238-0 A of the French Tax Code. It does not apply to dividends paid to persons established or domiciled in such a NCCT, or paid to a bank account opened in a financial institution located in such a NCCT.

Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state and local, and French and other tax consequences of owning and disposing shares or ADSs of TOTAL in their respective circumstances. In particular, a holder is encouraged to confirm with its advisor whether the holder is a U.S. Holder eligible for the benefits of the Treaty.

Taxation of dividends

Taxation of dividends

French taxation

The term “dividends” used in the following discussion means dividends within the meaning of applicable income tax treaties, or, where not defined by such treaties, within the meaning of the French domestic tax law as set forth in administrative guidelines dated February 25, 2005 (4 J-1-05) (the “Administrative Guidelines”).Treaty.

Dividends paid to non-residents of France are in principle subject to a French withholding tax at a rate of 30%. This withholding tax is reduced to 21% with respect to dividends received as from January 1, 2012 by non-residents of France who are residents of certain States located within the European Economic Area.

However, the rate may be reduced pursuant to a tax treaty or similar agreement. Underunder the Treaty, a U.S. Holder is generally entitled to a reduced rate of French withholding tax of 15% with respect to dividends, provided the ownership of shares or ADSs is not effectively attributable to a permanent establishment or to a fixed base in France andthat certain other requirements are satisfied.

U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors in order to determine the effect of the Treaty and the applicable procedures in respect of the Administrative Guidelines, in light of such particular circumstances.

The Administrative Guidelinesguidelines (Bulletin Officiel des Finances Publiques, BOI-INT-DG-20-20-20-20-20120912) (the “Administrative Guidelines”) set forth the conditions under which the reduced French withholding tax at the rate of 15% may be available. The immediate application of the reduced 15% rate is available to those U.S. Holders that may benefit from the so-called “simplified procedure” (within the meaning of the Administrative Guidelines).

Under the “simplified procedure”, U.S. Holders may claim the immediate application of withholding tax at the rate of 15% on the dividends to be received by them, provided that:

 

(i)they furnish to the U.S. financial institution managing their securities account a certificate of residence conforming with the model attached to the Administrative Guidelines.form No. 5000. The immediate application of the 15% withholding tax will be available only if the certificate of residence is sent to the U.S. financial institution managing their securities account beforeno later than the dividend payment date.
Furthermore, each financial institution managing theU.S. Holders’ securities account must also send to the French paying agent the figure of the total amount of dividends to be received which are eligible to the reduced withholding tax rate before the dividend payment date; and
(ii)the U.S. financial institution managing the U.S. Holder’s securities account provides to the French paying agent alist of the eligible U.S. Holders and other pieces of information set forth in the Administrative Guidelines. Furthermore, the financial institution managing the U.S. Holders’ securities account should certify that eachthe U.S. Holder is, to the best of its knowledge, aUnited States resident within the meaning of the Treaty. These documents must be sent as soon as possible, in all cases beforeto the French payingagent within a time frame that will allow the French paying agent to file them no later than the end of thethird month computed as from the end of the month of the dividend payment date.

Where the U.S. Holder’s identity and tax residence are known by the French paying agent, the latter may release such U.S. Holder from furnishing to (i) the financial institution managing its securities account, or (ii) as the case may be, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the abovementioned certificate of residence, and apply the 15% withholding tax rate to dividends it pays to such U.S. Holder.

U.S. Pension Funds and Other Tax-Exempt Entities created and operating in accordance with the provisions of Sections 401(a), 403(b), 457 or 501(c)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (IRC) are subject to the same general filing requirements except that, in addition, they have to supply a certificate issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or any other document stating that they have been created and are operating in accordance with the provisions of the above-mentioned Code Sections. This certificate must be produced together with the first request of application of the reduced rate, once together with the first request of immediate application of the 15% withholding tax and at French Tax Authorities’s specific request.

In the same way, regulated companies such as RIC, REIT or REMIC will have to send to the financial institution managing their securities account a certificate from the IRS indicating that they are classified as Regulated Companies (RIC, REIT or REMIC) within the provisions of the relevant sections of the IRC. In principle, this certification must be produced each year and before the dividend payment.

For a U.S. Holder that is not entitled to the “simplified” procedure“simplified procedure” and whose identity and tax residence are not known by the paying agent at the time of the payment, the 30% French withholding tax will be levied at the time the dividends are paid. Such U.S. Holder, however, may be entitled to a refund of the withholding tax in excess of the 15% rate under the “standard”, as opposed to the “simplified”“simplified procedure”, procedure, provided that the U.S. Holder furnishes to the French paying agent an application for refund on forms No. 5000-FR and/5000 and 5001(or 5001-FR (or any

other relevant form to be issued by the French tax authorities) certified by the U.S. financial institution managing the U.S. Holder’s securities account (or, if not, by the competent U.S. tax authorities) before December 31 of the second year following the date of payment of the withholding tax at the 30% rate to the French tax authorities, according to the requirements provided by the Administrative Guidelines.

Copies of forms No. 5000-FR5000 and 5001-FR5001 (or any other relevant form to be issued by the French tax authorities) as well as the form of the certificate of residence and the U.S. financial institution certification, together with instructions, are available from the U.S. Internal Revenue ServiceIRS and the FrenchCentre des Impôts des Non-Residentsat 10, rue du Centre, 93463 Noisy le Grand, France. tax authorities.

These forms, together with instructions, will also be provided by the Depositary to all U.S. Holders of ADRs registered with the Depositary. The Depositary will use reasonable efforts to follow the procedures established by the French tax authorities for U.S. Holders to benefit from the immediate application of the 15% French withholding tax rate or, as the case may be, to recover the excess 15% French withholding tax initially withheld and deducted in respect of dividends distributed to them by TOTAL. To effect such benefit or recovery, the Depositary shall advise such U.S. Holder to return the relevant forms to it, properly completed and executed. Upon receipt of the relevant forms properly completed and executed by such U.S. Holder, the Depositary shall cause them to be filed with the appropriate French tax authorities, and upon receipt of any resulting remittance, the Depositary shall distribute to the U.S. Holder entitled thereto, as soon as practicable, the proceeds thereof in U.S. dollars.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.149


Item 10 - Additional Information

The identity and address of the French paying agent are available from TOTAL.

U.S. taxationIn addition, subject to certain specific filing obligations, there is no withholding tax on dividend payments made by French companies to non-French collective investment funds formed under foreign law and established in a Member State of the European Union or in another State or territory, such as the United States, that has entered with France into an administrative assistance agreement for the purpose of combating fraud and tax evasion, and which fulfill the two following conditions:

o

the fund raises capital among a number of investors for the purpose of investing in accordance with a defined investment policy, in the interest of its investors; and

o

the fund has characteristics similar to those of collective investment funds organized under French law (open-end mutual fund (OPCVM), open-end real estate fund (OPCI) and closed-end investment companies (SICAF)).

Collective investment funds are urged to consult their own tax advisors to confirm whether they are eligible to such provisions and under which conditions.

U.S. taxation

For U.S. federal income tax purposes and subject to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed below, the gross amount of any dividend a U.S. Holder must include in gross income equals the amount paid by TOTAL to the extent of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of TOTAL (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes). The dividend will be income from foreign sources. Dividends paid to anon-corporate U.S. Holder in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013, that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to the holder at a maximum tax rate

of 15%,the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains provided that the shares or ADSs are held for more than sixty days during the 121-day period beginning sixty days before the ex-dividend date and the holder meets other holding period requirements. TOTAL believes that dividends paid by TOTAL with respect to its shares or ADSs will be qualified dividend income. The dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to a U.S. corporation under Section 243 of the Code. The dividend is taxable to the U.S. Holder when the holder, in the case of shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, receives the dividend, actually or constructively. To the extent that an amount received by a U.S. Holder exceeds the allocable share of TOTAL’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, it will be applied first to reduce such holder’s tax basis in shares or ADSs owned by such holder and then, to the extent it exceeds the holder’s tax basis, it will constitute capital gain.

The amount of any dividend distribution includible in the income of a U.S. Holder equals the U.S. dollar value of the euro payment made, determined at the spot euro/dollar exchange rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in the U.S. Holder’s income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. Any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the dividend payment is includible in the U.S. Holder’s income to the date the payment is converted into U.S. dollars will generally be treated as ordinary income or loss from sources within the United States and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income.

Subject to certain conditions and limitations, French taxes withheld in accordance with the Treaty will generally be eligible for credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. In addition, special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the maximum 15%preferential tax rate.rates. To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is available to a U.S. Holder under French law or under the Treaty, the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for credit against such an individual’s United States federal income tax liability.

For this purpose, dividends distributed by TOTAL will constitute “passive income”, or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “general income”, which are treated separately from one another for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to the U.S. Holder. Alternatively, a U.S. Holder may claim all foreign taxes paid as an itemized deduction in lieu of claiming a foreign tax credit.

Taxation of disposition of shares

In general, a U.S. Holder who is eligible for the benefits of the Treaty will not be subject to French tax on any capital gain from the sale or exchange of the ADSs or redemption of the underlying shares unless those ADSs or shares form part of a business property of a permanent establishment or fixed base that the U.S. Holder has in France. Special rules may apply to individuals who are residents of more than one country.

A transferfinancial transaction tax assessed on the higher of the purchase price and the fair market value of the shares applies, to certain transfers of shares in French companies. Such transfer tax is equal to:

3% for the portion of the purchase price (or the fair market value, if higher) below200,000;

0.5% for the portion of the purchase price (or the fair market value, if higher) between200,000 and500 million;

0.25% for the portion of the purchase price (or the fair market value, if higher) above500 million.

The transfer tax does not apply to transfers of shares in TOTAL, provided that the transfer is not evidenced by a written agreement.

Recently enacted legislation applicable as from August 1, 2012, has introduced, under certain conditions, a financial transaction tax onto the acquisition of shares of publicly traded companies registered in France having a market capitalization overbillion.billion on December 1st of the year preceding the acquisition. A list of the companies within the scope of the financial transaction tax will befor 2014 has been published in a forthcoming decree. We expect thatdecree dated December 27, 2013. TOTAL will beis included in this list. The tax also applies to the acquisition of ADRs evidencing ADSs. The financial transaction tax will beis due at a rate of 0.1%0.2% on the valueprice paid to acquire the shares. The person or entity liable for the tax is generally the provider of investment services defined in Article L. 321-1 of the acquired shares. Transactions thatFrench Monetary and Financial Code (prestataire de services d’investissement). Investment service providers providing equivalent services outside France are subject to the financial transaction tax are exempt from the above-mentioned transfer tax (which was also modified byunder the same legislation).terms and conditions. Taxable transactions are broadly construed but several exceptions may apply. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of such reforms.financial transaction tax.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes and subject to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized on the sale or disposition and the holder’s tax basis, determined in U.S. dollars, in the shares or ADSs. The gain or loss generally will be U.S. source gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period of the shares or ADSs is more than one year at the time of the disposition. Long-term capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. Holder is generally

taxed at preferential rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitation.

Passive foreign investment status

TOTAL believes that the shares or ADSs will not be treated as stock of a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus is subject to change. If TOTAL is treated as a PFIC, unless a U.S. Holder elects

150TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Items 10 - 11

to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the shares or ADSs, gain realized on the sale or other disposition of the shares or ADSs would in general not be treated as capital gain. Instead, a U.S. Holder would be treated as if he or she had realized such gain and certain “excess distributions” ratably over the holding period for the shares or ADSs and would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, in addition to which an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year would apply. With certain exceptions, a U.S. Holder’s shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if TOTAL were a PFIC at any time during his or her holding period in the shares or ADSs. Dividends paid will not be eligible for the specialpreferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income if TOTAL is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.

French estate and gift taxes

In general, a transfer of ADSs or shares by gift or by reason of the death of a U.S. Holder that would otherwise be subject to French gift or inheritance tax, respectively, will not be subject to such French tax by reason of the Convention between the United States of America and the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Estates, Inheritances and Gifts, dated November 24, 1978 as amended, unless the donor or the transferor is domiciled in France at the time of making the gift, or at the time of his death, or if the ADSs or shares were used in, or held for use in, the conduct of a business through a permanent establishment or a fixed base in France.

French wealth tax

The French wealth tax does not apply to a U.S. Holder (i) that is not an individual, or (ii) in the case of individuals who are eligible for the benefits of the Treaty and who own, alone or with related persons, directly or indirectly, TOTAL shares which give right to less than 25% of TOTAL’s earnings.

U.S. state and local taxes

In addition to U.S. federal income tax, U.S. Holders of shares or ADSs may be subject to U.S. state and local taxes with respect to their shares or ADSs. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors.

Dividends and Paying Agents

After BNP Paribas Securities Services performs centralizing procedures, dividends are paid through the accounts of financial intermediaries participating in Euroclear France’s direct payment procedures. The Bank of New York Mellon acts as paying agent for dividends distributed to ADS holders.

Documents on Display

TOTAL files annual, periodic, and other reports and information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may inspect any reports, statements or other information TOTAL files with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at the SEC’s public reference rooms by calling the SEC for more information at 1-800-SEC-0330. All of TOTAL’s SEC filings made after December 31, 2001, are available to the public at the SEC Web sitewebsite at http://www.sec.gov and from certain commercial document retrieval services. You may also inspect any document the Company files with the SEC at the offices of The New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

 

 

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Please refer to Note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for a qualitative and quantitative discussion of the Group’s exposure to market risks. Please also refer to Notes 29 and 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for details of the different derivatives owned by the Group in these markets.

As part of its financing and cash management activities, the Group uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These instruments are principallymainly interest rate and currency swaps. The Group may also occasionally use on a less frequent basis, futures contracts and options contracts.options. These operations and their accounting treatment are detailed in Note 1 paragraph M and Notes 20, 28 and 29 to the

Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

The financial performance of TOTAL is sensitive to a number of factors, the most significant being oil and gas prices, generally expressed in dollars, and exchange rates, in particular that of the dollar versus the euro. Generally, a rise in the price of crude oil has a positive effect on earnings as a result of an increase in revenues from oil and gas production. Conversely, a decline in crude oil prices reduces revenues. The impact of changes in crude oil prices on DownstreamRefining & Chemicals and Chemicals operationsMarketing & Services activities depends upon the speed at which the prices of finished products adjust to reflect these changes. All of the Group’s activities are, to various degrees, sensitive to fluctuations in the dollar/euro exchange rate.

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.151


Items 12 - 15

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

American Depositary Receipts fees and charges

The Bank of New York Mellon, as a depositary, collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADRs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADRs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

 

Investors must pay:  For:
$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)  

      Issuance of ADRs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property, stocks splits or mergermergers

       Cancellation of ADRs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to the investor had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs  

      Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities that are distributed by the depositary to ADS registered holders

Registration or transfer fees  

      Transfer and registration of shares on the Company’s share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when the investor deposits or withdraws shares

Expenses of the depositary  

      Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)

       Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars

Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes  

      As necessary

Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities

  

      As necessary

 

The depositary has agreed to reimburse expenses (“Reimbursed Expenses”) incurred by the Company for the establishment and maintenance of the ADS program that include, but are not limited to, exchange listing fees, annual meeting expenses, standardout-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs (e.g., the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of U.S. Federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile, and telephone calls), shareholder identification, investor relations activities or programs in North America, accounting fees (such as external audit fees incurred in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the preparation of the Company’s Form 20-F and paid to the FASB and the PCAOB), legal

legal fees and other expenses incurred in connection with the preparation of regulatory filings and other documentation related to ongoing SEC, NYSE and U.S. securities law compliance. In certain instances, the depositary has agreed to provide additional payments to the Company based on certain applicable performance indicators relating to the ADR facility. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse the Company, but the amount of reimbursement available to the Company is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the depositary collects from investors.

From March 16, 20112013 to March 15, 2012,2014, the Company received from the depositary a payment of $3,327,796.00$3,500,000.00 with respect to certain Reimbursed Expenses.

 

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF

SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Group’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness, as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the design and operation of the Group’s disclosure controls and procedures, which are defined as those controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as

amended, is recorded, summarized and reported within specified time periods. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable

152TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Items 15 - 16C

assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Group’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial

reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, the effectiveness of an internal control system may change over time.

The Group’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework

issued in 1992 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on the results of this evaluation, the Group’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.2013.

The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2013, was audited by KPMG S.A. and Ernst & Young Audit, independent registered public accounting firms, as stated in their report on page F-2 of this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Group’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or that were reasonably likely to materially affect, the Group’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Group is exploring ways to adapt its internal control system to the 2013 COSO framework, which will replace the 1992 COSO framework as from December 15, 2014.

 

ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Ms. Patricia Barbizet is the Audit Committee financial expert. Ms. Barbizet is an independent member of the Board of Directors in accordance with the NYSE listing

standards applicable to TOTAL, as are the other members of the Audit Committee.

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS

At its meeting on February 18, 2004, the Board of Directors adopted a code of ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting

Officer and the financial and accounting officers for its principal activities. A copy of this code of ethics is included as an exhibit to this Annual Report.

ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, fees for services provided by Ernst & Young Audit and KPMG were as follows:

 

  

KPMG

Year Ended December 31,

   

Ernst & Young Audit

Year Ended December 31,

   

KPMG

fiscal year

   

Ernst & Young Audit

fiscal year

 
(M)  2011   2010   2011   2010   2013   2012   2013   2012 

Audit Fees

   14.1     15.1     15.6     15.2     15.2     14.3     18.4     18.5  

Audit-Related Fees(a)

   3.8     3.6     1.9     0.7     4.7     3.8     1.3     1.6  

Tax Fees(b)

   1.6     1.2     1.4     1.7     1.9     1.8     2.5     2.1  

All Other Fees(c)

   0.2     0.1     0.2     0.2     0.3          0.2     0.1  

Total

   19.7     20.0     19.1     17.8     22.1     19.9     22.4     22.3  

 

(a)

Audit-related fees are generally fees billed for services that are closely related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements. These include due diligence services related to business combinations, attestation services not required by statute or regulation, agreed upon or expanded auditing procedures related to accounting or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, information system reviews, internal control reviews and assistance with internal control reporting requirements.

(b)

Tax fees are fees for services related to international and domestic tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund, tax planning and tax advice, including assistance with tax audits and tax appeals, and tax services regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments and expatriate tax assistance and compliance.

(c)

All other fees are principally for risk management advisory services.

 

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy that sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the statutory auditors may be pre-approved and that are not prohibited by regulatory or other professional requirements. This policy provides for both pre-approval of certain types of services through the use of an annual budget approved by the Audit Committee

Audit Committee for these types of services and specialpre-approval of services by the Audit Committee on acase-by-case basis. The Audit Committee reviews on an annual basis the services provided by the statutory auditors. During 2011,2013, noaudit-related fees, tax fees or other non-audit fees were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to thede minimisexception to the pre-approval requirement provided by paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

 

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.153


Items 16D - 16G

ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

None.

ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

 

Period

Total Number Of

Shares

Purchased

Average Price

Paid Per

Share ()

Total Number Of

Shares Purchased,

As Part Of Publicly

Announced

Plans Or

Programs(a)

Maximum Number

Of Shares  That May

Yet Be Purchased

Under The Plans Or

Programs(b)

January 2011

122,526,633

February 2011

122,588,776

March 2011

122,626,999

April 2011

123,539,732

May 2011

123,567,601

June 2011

123,655,175

July 2011

123,891,589

August 2011

123,892,274

September 2011

126,818,649

October 2011

126,819,834

November 2011

126,822,199

December 2011

126,822,558

January 2012

126,824,217

February 2012

126,836,267
Period  

Total Number Of

Shares

Purchased

   

Average Price

Paid Per

Share ()

   

Total Number Of

Shares Purchased,

As Part Of Publicly

Announced

Plans Or

Programs(a)

   

Maximum Number

Of Shares That May

Yet Be Purchased

Under The Plans Or

Programs(b)

 

January 2013

                  128,201,798  

February 2013

                  128,201,823  

March 2013

                  128,201.943  

April 2013

                  129,282,275  

May 2013

                  129,282,925  

June 2013

                  129,282,940  

July 2013

   712,847     40.096     712,847     128,571,408  

August 2013

   3,701,353     40.662     3,701,353     124,873,894  

September 2013

                  128,504,419  

October 2013

                  128,525,844  

November 2013

                  128,543,449  

December 2013

                  128,553,368  

January 2014

                  128,556,625  

February 2014

                  128,572,574  

 

(a)

The shareholders’ meeting of May 13, 2011, cancelled17, 2013, canceled and replaced the previous resolution from the shareholders’ meeting of May 21, 2010,11, 2012, authorizing the Board of Directors to trade in the Company’s own shares on the market for a period of 18eighteen months within the framework of the stock purchase program. The maximum number of shares that may be purchased by virtue of this authorization or under the previous authorization may not exceed 10% of the total number of shares constituting the share capital, this amount being periodically adjusted to take into account operations modifying the share capital after each shareholders’ meeting. Under no circumstances may the total number of shares the Company holds, either directly or indirectly through its subsidiaries, exceed 10% of the share capital.

(b)

Based on 10% of the Company’s share capital, and after deducting the shares held by the Company for cancellation and the shares held by the Company to cover the share purchase option plans for Company employees and restricted share grants for Company employees, as well as after deducting the shares held by the subsidiaries.

ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

Not applicable.

ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Summary of Significant Differences between French Corporate Governance Practices and the NYSE’s Corporate Governance Standards, as required by section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

Overview

The following paragraphs provide a brief, general summary of significant differences between theways in which our corporate governance standards followed by TOTAL under French law and guidelines, andpractices differ from those required by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) for U.S. companies that have common stock listed on the NYSE. While our management believes that our corporate governance practices are similar in many respects to those of U.S. domestic NYSE listed companies and provide investors with protections that are comparable in many respects to those established by the NYSE Listed Company Manual, certain significant differences are described below.

The principal sources of corporate governance standards in France are the French Commercial Code (Code(Code de Commerce)Commerce), the French Financial and Monetary Code (Code(Code monétaire et financier)financier), as amended from time to time, and the regulations and recommendations provided by the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité(Autorité desmarchés financiers,, AMF), as well as a number of general

recommendations and guidelines on corporate governance, most notably the Corporate Governance Code for

Listed Companies published in December 2008 (as amended in April 2010)2010 and June 2013) by the principal French business confederations, theAssociation Française des Entreprises Privées(AFEP) and theMouvement des Entreprises de France(MEDEF) (the “AFEP-MEDEF Code”).

The AFEP-MEDEF Code includes, among other things, recommendations relating to the role and operation of the board of directors (creation, composition and evaluation of the board of directors and the audit, compensation and nominating committees) and the independence criteria for board members. Articles L. 820-1et seq. of the French Commercial Code prohibits statutory auditors from providing certain non-audit services and defines certain criteria for the independence of statutory auditors. In France, the independence of statutory auditors is also monitored by an independent body, the High Council for Statutory Auditors (Haut(Haut Conseil du commissariat aux comptes)comptes).

For an overview of certain of our corporate governance policies, see “Item 6. Corporate Governance”.

Composition of Board of Directors; Independence

The NYSE listing standards provide that the board of directors of a U.S. listedU.S.-listed company must consist of a majority of independent directors and that certain committeesthe audit committee, the nominating/corporate governance committee and the compensation committee must consist solelybe composed entirely of independent directors. A director qualifies as independent only if the board affirmatively determines that the

154TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Item 16G - Summary of Significant Corporate Governance Differences

director has no material relationship with the company, either directly or indirectly.as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company. In addition, the listing standards enumerate a number of relationships that preclude independence. Furthermore, as discussed below, new rules under the listing standards that came into effect in 2013 require additional procedures in regards to the independence of directors who sit on the compensation committee.

French law does not contain any independence requirement for the members of the board of directors of a French company, unlessexcept for the board establishes an audit committee, as described below. Under French law, the functions of board chairman and chief executive officer may be performed by the same person. The AFEP- MEDEF Code recommends, however, that (i) at least half of the members of the board of directors be independent in companies that have a dispersed ownership structure and no controlling shareholder, and (ii) at least a third of the members of the board of directors be independent in companies that have a controlling shareholder. Members of the board representing the employee shareholders, as well as members representing the employees, are not taken into account in order to determine these percentages. The AFEP-MEDEF Code states that a director is independent when “he or she has no relationship of any nature with the company, its group or the management of either, that may compromise the exercise of his or her freedom of judgment.” The AFEP-MEDEF Code also enumerates specific criteria for determining independence, which are on the whole consistent with the goals of the NYSE’s rules, including recent amendments, although the specific tests under the two standards may vary on some points.

Based on the proposal of TOTAL’s Governance & Ethics Committee (formerly Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee,Committee), the Board of Directors of TOTAL at its meeting on February 9, 2012,11, 2014, examined the independence of each of the Company’s directorsDirectors as of December 31, 2011, and2013, relying on its assessment of the independence criteria set forth in the AFEP-MEDEF Code. The Board of Directors considered that all of the directorsDirectors of the Company are independent, with the exceptions of Mr. de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 21, 2010, and Mr. Desmarest, honorary Chairman (formerly Chairman of the Board of Directors until May 21, 2010,2010), and Mr. Clément, director representing employee shareholders.

Representationnoted that, as of women on corporate boardsFebruary 11, 2014, 85%(1) of the Directors were independent.

The

Representation of women on corporate boards

Article L. 225-18-1 of the FrenchJournal Officielpublished law No. 2011-103 dated January 27, 2011, relating to the representation of women on the boards of certain French companies, including French companies listed on Euronext Paris.

New rules provide Commercial Code provides for legally binding quotas to boost the percentage of women on boards of directors of French listed

French-listed companies, requiring that women represent: (i) at least 20% within two years (followingfollowing the first ordinary shareholders’ meeting held after January 1, 2014),2014, and (ii) at least 40% within five years (followingfollowing the first ordinary shareholders’ meeting held after January 1, 2017).2017. Members of the board representing the employees are not taken into account in order to determine these percentages. When the board of directors consists of less than nine members, the difference between the number of directors of each gender at the end of the five-year5-year period should not be higher than two. Any appointment of a director made in violation of these rules shall be declared null and void and the payment of the directors’ compensation shall be suspended until the board composition complies with the law’s requirements (the management report shall also indicate the suspension of the directors’ compensation until the board composition complies with the law’s requirements). However, decisions of a board of directors

that failsfail to comply with these quotas may not be declared null and void. As of February 11, 2014, the Company’s Board had five female members (i.e., one-third of the Directors).

Board committees

Overview.The NYSE listing standards require that a U.S. listedU.S.-listed company have an audit committee, a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee. Each of these committees must consist solely of independent directors and must have a written charter that addresses certain matters specified in the listing standards. In addition, the NYSE adopted in 2013 new compensation committee rules, which require that, in addition to the independence criteria referenced above under “Composition of Board of Directors; Independence”, certain enumerated factors be taken into consideration when making a determination on the independence of directors on the compensation committee or when engaging advisors to the compensation committee.

With the exception of an audit committee, as described below, French law requires neither the establishment of board committees nor the adoption of written charters.

The AFEP-MEDEF Code recommends, however, that the board of directors sets up, in addition to an audit committee, a nominating committee and a compensation committee, indicating that the nominating and compensation committees may form only one committee. The AFEP-MEDEF Code also recommends that at least two-thirds of the audit committee members and a majority of the members of each of the compensation committee and the nominating committee be independent directors.directors, it being specified that the chairman of the compensation committee should be independent.

TOTAL has established an Audit Committee, a Governance & Ethics Committee (formerly Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee), a Compensation Committee and a CompensationStrategic Committee, and considers all of the members of these committees to be independent with the exception of Mr. Desmarest, who is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Strategic Committee and chairs the NominatingGovernance & Corporate GovernanceEthics Committee, and Mr. de Margerie, who chairs the Strategic Committee. For the text of the charters that define the scope of each committee’s activity as well as the membership of each committee, see “Item 6. Corporate Governance”. Each

The NYSE listing standards also require that the audit, nominating/corporate governance and compensation committees of a U.S.-listed company be vested with decision-making powers on certain matters. Under French law, these committees has a charter that definesare advisory in nature and have no decision-making authority. Board committees are responsible for examining matters within the scope of its activity.their charter and making recommendations on these matters to the board of directors. Under French law, the board of directors has the final decision-making authority.

Audit committee. The NYSE listing standards contain detailed requirements for the audit committees of U.S. listedU.S.-listed companies. Some, but not all, of these

requirements also apply to non-U.S. listednon-U.S.-listed companies, such as TOTAL.

French law requires the board of directors of companies listed in France to establish an audit committee (Article L. 823-19 of the French Commercial Code), at least one member of which must be an independent director and must be competent in finance or

(1)

Not including the director representing employee shareholders, according to the recommendations made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.155


Item 16G - Summary of Significant Corporate Governance Differences

accounting. The AFEP-MEDEF Code provides that at leasttwo-thirds of the directors on the audit committee be independent and that the audit committee should not include any executive director.

Pursuant to French law and the AFEP-MEDEF Code, the audit committee is responsible for, among other things, reviewing the financial statements and ensuring the relevance and consistency of accounting methods used in drawing up the consolidated and corporate accounts, examining the company’s risk exposure and material off-balance sheet commitments and the scope of consolidation, monitoring the process for the preparation of financial information, monitoring the efficiency of internal control procedures and risk management systems, managing the process of selecting statutory auditors, expressing an opinion on the amount of their fees and monitoring compliance with rules designed to ensure auditor independence, regularly interviewing statutory auditors without the executive management being present and calling upon outside experts if necessary.

Although the audit committee requirements under French law and recommendations under the AFEP-MEDEF Code are less detailed than those contained in the NYSE listing standards, the NYSE listing standards, French law and the AFEP-MEDEF Code share the goal of establishing a system for overseeing the company’s accounting that is independent from management and that ensures auditor independence. As a result, they address similar topics, and there is some overlap.

For the specific tasks performed by the Audit Committee of TOTAL that exceed those required by French law and those recommended by the AFEP-MEDEF Code, see “Item 6. Corporate Governance — Audit Committee”.

One structural difference between the legal status of the audit committee of a U.S. listedU.S.-listed company and that of a French listedFrench-listed company concerns the degree of the committee’s involvement in managing the relationship between the company and the auditor. French law requires French companies that publish consolidated financial statements, such as TOTAL S.A., to have two co-auditors. While the NYSE listing standards require that the audit committee of a U.S. listedU.S.-listed company have direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the auditor, French law provides that the election of the co-auditors is the sole responsibility of the shareholders duly convened at a shareholders’ meeting. In making itstheir decision, the shareholders’ meetingshareholders may rely on proposals submitted to itthem by the board of

directors, the decision of the latter being taken upon consultation with the audit committee. The shareholders’ meeting electsshareholders elect the auditors for an audit period of six fiscal years. The auditors may only be dismissed by a court and only on grounds of professional negligence or incapacity to perform their mission.

Disclosure

Meetings of non-management directors

The NYSE listing standards require U.S. listedthat the non-management directors of a U.S.-listed company meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. French law does not contain such a requirement. The AFEP-MEDEF Code recommends, however, that directors should have the opportunity to meet outside the presence of executive directors, and that the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors should provide for one meeting of this kind per year, during which the performance of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the Deputy Chief Executive Officer(s) would be evaluated, and which would be an opportunity to reflect periodically on the future of the Company’s management.

Although the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors do not expressly provide that one meeting of the non-executive directors be held per year without the participation of the executive or “in house” directors, the Board of Directors’ practice constitutes a mechanism which has the same effect as the recommendation made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code. In fact, at its meeting held each year in February, the Board of Directors evaluates the performances of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, where applicable, reflects on the future of the Company’s management. When these particular matters are reviewed, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as the members of the Executive Committee present at the meeting (that are not executive and non-executive directors), leave the Board meeting. The Honorary Chairman then serves as Chairman of the Board with regard to these matters.

Disclosure

The NYSE listing standards require U.S.-listed companies to adopt, and post on their websites, a set of corporate governance guidelines. The guidelines must address, among other things: director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management and independent advisers, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession, and an annual performance evaluation of the board. In addition, the chief executive officer of a U.S. listedU.S.-listed company must certify to the NYSE annually that he or she is not aware of any violations by the company of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.

French law requires neither the adoption of such guidelines nor the provision of such certification. The AFEP-MEDEF Code recommends, however, that the board of directors of a French listedFrench-listed company performperforms an annual review of its operation and that a formal evaluation, possibly with the assistance of an outside consultant, be undertaken every three years which(which for TOTAL took place in early 2012 without2013) with the assistance of an outside consultant, and that the board of directors reviews its composition, organization and operation and that shareholders be informed of these evaluations each year in the annual reportreport. In addition, Article L. 225-37 of the evaluations. In addition,French Commercial Code provides that the chairman of the board of directors annually describes in a report to the shareholders the composition of the board and the balanced representation of men and women in the board, the preparation and organization of the board’s work, as well as the internal controls and risk management procedures implemented by the company. The AFEP-MEDEF Code also addresses deontology rules that the directors are expected to comply with.

Code of business conduct and ethics

The NYSE listing standards require each U.S. listedU.S.-listed company to adopt, and post on its website, a code of business conduct and ethics for its directors, officers and employees. There is no similar requirement or recommendation under French law. However, under the SEC’s rules and regulations, all companies required to submit periodic reports to the SEC, including TOTAL, must disclose in their annual reports whether they have adopted a code of ethics for their principal executive officer and senior financial officers. In addition, they must file a copy of the code with the SEC, post the text of the code on their website or undertake to provide a copy upon request to any person without charge. There is significant, though not complete, overlap between the code of ethics required by the NYSE listing standards and the code of ethics for senior financial officers required by the SEC’s rules. For a discussion of the code of ethics adopted by TOTAL, see “Item 6. Corporate Governance” and “Item 16B. Code of Ethics”.

 

156TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Items 16H - 19

ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements, together with the report of Ernst & Young Audit and KPMG S.A. thereon, are held as part of this annual report.

 

   Page 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms on the Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-1  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

   F-2  

Consolidated Statement of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011

   F-3  

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011

   F-4  

Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011

   F-5  

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011

   F-6  

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December  31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011

   F-7  

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-8  

Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)

   S-1  

Schedules have been omitted since they are not required under the applicable instructions or the substance of the required information is shown in the financial statements.

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

The following documents are filed as part of this annual report:

 

1

  Bylaws (Statuts) of TOTAL S.A. (as amended through December 31, 2011)2013).

2

The total amount of long-term debt securities authorized under any instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We hereby agree to furnish to the SEC, upon its request, a copy of any instrument defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company or of its subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed.

7.1

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.

7.2

Computation of earnings to fixed charges.

8

  List of Subsidiaries (see Note 35 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report).

11

  Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005)2005, filed on April 20, 2006).

12.1

  Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOfficer.

12.2

  Certification of Chief Financial OfficerOfficer.

13.1

  Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOfficer.

13.2

  Certification of Chief Financial OfficerOfficer.

15

  Consent of ERNST & YOUNG AUDIT and of KPMG S.A.

SIGNATURE

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

TOTAL S.A.

By:

 

/s/ CHRISTOPHECHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE MARGERIE

 Name: Christophe de Margerie
 Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 26, 2012

27, 2014

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.157


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Year ended December 31, 20112013

The Board of Directors and Shareholders,

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TOTAL S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”(“the Company”) as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011.2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011,2013, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

As discussed in the “Introduction” to the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for employee benefits as a result of the mandatory application of the revised standard IAS 19 – Employee Benefits.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria)(COSO) and our report dated March 7, 20126, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Paris La Défense, March 7, 20126, 2014

 

KPMG Audit

A division of KPMG S.A.

 ERNST & YOUNG Audit

/s/    JAY NIRSIMLOO

 

/s/    PASCAL MACIOCE

 

/s/    LAURENT VITSE

Jay Nirsimloo

 Pascal Macioce Laurent Vitse

Partner

 Partner Partner

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

ON THE INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Year ended December 31, 20112013

The Board of Directors and Shareholders,

We have audited TOTAL S.A. and subsidiaries’ (“the Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2013, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria)(COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying management’s annual reportManagement’s Annual Report on internal control over financial reporting.Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2013, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the COSO criteria.Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011,2013, and our report dated March 7, 20126, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Paris La Défense, March 7, 20126, 2014

 

KPMG Audit

A division of KPMG S.A.

 ERNST & YOUNG Audit

/s/    JAY NIRSIMLOO

 

/s/    PASCAL MACIOCE

 

/s/    LAURENT VITSE

Jay Nirsimloo

 Pascal Macioce Laurent Vitse

Partner

 Partner Partner

F-2TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

 

TOTAL

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)(a)     2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)(a)     2013 2012 2011 

Sales

   (Notes 4 & 5  184,693    159,269    131,327     (Notes 4 & 5  189,542    200,061    184,693  

Excise taxes

    (18,143  (18,793  (19,174    (17,887  (17,762  (18,143

Revenues from sales

    166,550    140,476    112,153      171,655    182,299    166,550  

Purchases net of inventory variation

   (Note 6  (113,892  (93,171  (71,058   (Note 6  (121,113  (126,798  (113,892

Other operating expenses

   (Note 6  (19,843  (19,135  (18,591   (Note 6  (21,687  (22,784  (19,792

Exploration costs

   (Note 6  (1,019  (864  (698   (Note 6  (1,633  (1,446  (1,019

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

    (7,506  (8,421  (6,682    (9,031  (9,525  (7,506

Other income

   (Note 7  1,946    1,396    314     (Note 7  1,725    1,462    1,946  

Other expense

   (Note 7  (1,247  (900  (600   (Note 7  (2,105  (915  (1,247

Financial interest on debt

    (713  (465  (530    (670  (671  (713

Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents

    273    131    132      64    100    273  

Cost of net debt

   (Note 29  (440  (334  (398   (Note 29  (606  (571  (440

Other financial income

   (Note 8  609    442    643     (Note 8  524    558    609  

Other financial expense

   (Note 8  (429  (407  (345   (Note 8  (529  (499  (429

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates

   (Note 12  1,925    1,953    1,642     (Note 12  2,571    2,010    1,925  

Income taxes

   (Note 9  (14,073  (10,228  (7,751   (Note 9  (11,110  (13,035  (14,091

Consolidated net income

    12,581    10,807    8,629      8,661    10,756    12,614  

Group share

    12,276    10,571    8,447      8,440    10,609    12,309  

Non-controlling interests

    305    236    182      221    147    305  

Earnings per share ()

    5.46    4.73    3.79      3.73    4.70    5.48  

Fully-diluted earnings per share ()

    5.44    4.71    3.78      3.72    4.68    5.45  

 

(a)

Except for per share amounts.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-3


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

TOTAL

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Consolidated net income

   12,581    10,807    8,629     8,661    10,756    12,614  

Other comprehensive income

        

Actuarial gains and losses

   513    (911  (533

Tax effect

   (216  362    191  

Items not potentially reclassifiable to profit and loss

   297    (549  (342

Currency translation adjustment

   1,498    2,231    (244   (2,199  (702  1,483  

Available for sale financial assets

   337    (100  38     25    (338  337  

Cash flow hedge

   (84  (80  128     117    65    (84

Share of other comprehensive income of associates, net amount

   (15  302    234  

Share of other comprehensive income of equity affiliates, net amount

   (857  160    (15

Other

   (2  (7  (5   (4  (14  (3

Tax effect

   (55  28    (38   (47  63    (55

Total other comprehensive income (net amount)(note 17)

   1,679    2,374    113  

Items potentially reclassifiable to profit and loss

   (2,965  (766  1,663  

Total other comprehensive income (net amount) (Note 17)

   (2,668  (1,315  1,321  

Comprehensive income

   14,260    13,181    8,742     5,993    9,441    13,935 ��

— Group share

   13,911    12,936    8,500     5,910    9,334    13,585  

— Non-controlling interests

   349    245    242     83    107    350  

F-4TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

 

TOTAL

 

As of December 31, (M)     2011 2010 2009 
As of December 31, (M€)     2013 2012 2011 

ASSETS

          

Non-current assets

          

Intangible assets, net

   (Notes 5 & 10  12,413    8,917    7,514     (Notes 5 & 10  13,341    12,858    12,413  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   (Notes 5 & 11  64,457    54,964    51,590     (Notes 5 & 11  75,759    69,332    64,457  

Equity affiliates: investments and loans

   (Note 12  12,995    11,516    13,624  

Equity affiliates : investments and loans

   (Note 12  14,804    13,759    12,995  

Other investments

   (Note 13  3,674    4,590    1,162     (Note 13  1,207    1,190    3,674  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt

   (Note 20  1,976    1,870    1,025     (Note 20  1,028    1,626    1,976  

Deferred income taxes

   (Note 9  2,810    2,279    2,070  

Other non-current assets

   (Note 14  4,871    3,655    3,081     (Note 14  3,195    2,663    2,457  

Total non-current assets

    100,386    85,512    77,996      112,144    103,707    100,042  

Current assets

          

Inventories, net

   (Note 15  18,122    15,600    13,867     (Note 15  16,023    17,397    18,122  

Accounts receivable, net

   (Note 16  20,049    18,159    15,719     (Note 16  16,984    19,206    20,049  

Other current assets

   (Note 16  10,767    7,483    8,198     (Note 16  10,798    10,086    10,767  

Current financial assets

   (Note 20  700    1,205    311     (Note 20  536    1,562    700  

Cash and cash equivalents

   (Note 27  14,025    14,489    11,662     (Note 27  14,647    15,469    14,025  

Assets classified as held for sale

   (Note 34  2,359    3,797      

Total current assets

    63,663    56,936    49,757      61,347    67,517    63,663  

Assets classified as held for sale

   (Note 34      1,270      

Total assets

    164,049    143,718    127,753      173,491    171,224    163,705  

LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

          

Shareholders’ equity

          

Common shares

    5,909    5,874    5,871      5,944    5,915    5,909  

Paid-in surplus and retained earnings

    66,506    60,538    55,372      74,449    70,116    65,430  

Currency translation adjustment

    (988  (2,495  (5,069    (4,385  (1,504  (1,004

Treasury shares

    (3,390  (3,503  (3,622    (3,379  (3,342  (3,390

Total shareholders’ equity — Group share

   (Note 17  68,037    60,414    52,552     (Note 17  72,629    71,185    66,945  

Non-controlling interests

    1,352    857    987      2,281    1,280    1,352  

Total shareholders’ equity

    69,389    61,271    53,539      74,910    72,465    68,297  

Non-current liabilities

          

Deferred income taxes

   (Note 9  12,260    9,947    8,948     (Note 9  12,943    12,132    11,855  

Employee benefits

   (Note 18  2,232    2,171    2,040     (Note 18  3,071    3,744    3,385  

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

   (Note 19  10,909    9,098    9,381     (Note 19  12,701    11,585    10,909  

Non-current financial debt

   (Note 20  22,557    20,783    19,437     (Note 20  25,069    22,274    22,557  

Total non-current liabilities

    47,958    41,999    39,806      53,784    49,735    48,706  

Current liabilities

          

Accounts payable

    22,086    18,450    15,383      21,958    21,648    22,086  

Other creditors and accrued liabilities

   (Note 21  14,774    11,989    11,908     (Note 21  13,821    14,698    14,774  

Current borrowings

   (Note 20  9,675    9,653    6,994     (Note 20  8,116    11,016    9,675  

Other current financial liabilities

   (Note 20  167    159    123     (Note 20  276    176    167  

Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale

   (Note 34  626    1,486      

Total current liabilities

    46,702    40,251    34,408      44,797    49,024    46,702  

Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale

   (Note 34      197      

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

    164,049    143,718    127,753      173,491    171,224    163,705  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-5


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW

 

TOTAL

(Note 27)

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

        

Consolidated net income

   12,581    10,807    8,629     8,661    10,756    12,614  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   8,628    9,117    7,107     10,058    10,481    8,628  

Non-current liabilities, valuation allowances, and deferred taxes

   1,665    527    441  

Non-current liabilities, valuation allowances and deferred taxes

   1,171    1,470    1,632  

Impact of coverage of pension benefit plans

       (60           (362    

(Gains) losses on disposals of assets

   (1,590  (1,046  (200   (68  (1,321  (1,590

Undistributed affiliates’ equity earnings

   (107  (470  (378   (583  211    (107

(Increase) decrease in working capital

   (1,739  (496  (3,316   1,930    1,084    (1,739

Other changes, net

   98    114    77     304    143    98  

Cash flow from operating activities

   19,536    18,493    12,360     21,473    22,462    19,536  

CASH FLOW USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

        

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment additions

   (17,950  (13,812  (11,849   (22,400  (19,905  (17,950

Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired

   (854  (862  (160   (16  (191  (854

Investments in equity affiliates and other securities

   (4,525  (654  (400   (1,318  (898  (4,525

Increase in non-current loans

   (1,212  (945  (940   (2,188  (1,949  (1,212

Total expenditures

   (24,541  (16,273  (13,349   (25,922  (22,943  (24,541

Proceeds from disposals of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment

   1,439    1,534    138     1,329    1,418    1,439  

Proceeds from disposals of subsidiaries, net of cash sold

   575    310         1,995    352    575  

Proceeds from disposals of non-current investments

   5,691    1,608    2,525     248    2,816    5,691  

Repayment of non-current loans

   873    864    418     1,242    1,285    873  

Total divestments

   8,578    4,316    3,081     4,814    5,871    8,578  

Cash flow used in investing activities

   (15,963  (11,957  (10,268   (21,108  (17,072  (15,963

CASH FLOW USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES

        

Issuance (repayment) of shares:

        

— Parent company shareholders

   481    41    41  

— Treasury shares

       49    22  

—Parent company shareholders

   365    32    481  

—Treasury shares

   (179  (68    

Dividends paid:

        

— Parent company shareholders

   (5,140  (5,098  (5,086

— Non-controlling interests

   (172  (152  (189

—Parent company shareholders

   (5,367  (5,184  (5,140

—Non controlling interests

   (118  (104  (172

Other transactions with non-controlling interests

   (573  (429       1,621    1    (573

Net issuance (repayment) of non-current debt

   4,069    3,789    5,522     8,359    5,279    4,069  

Increase (decrease) in current borrowings

   (3,870  (731  (3,124   (6,804  (2,754  (3,870

Increase (decrease) in current financial assets and liabilities

   896    (817  (54   978    (947  896  

Cash flow used in financing activities

   (4,309  (3,348  (2,868   (1,145  (3,745  (4,309

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (736  3,188    (776   (780  1,645    (736

Effect of exchange rates

   272    (361  117     (42  (201  272  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

   14,489    11,662    12,321     15,469    14,025    14,489  

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

   14,025    14,489    11,662     14,647    15,469    14,025  

F-6TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

TOTAL

 

 Common shares
issued
 Paid-in surplus
and retained
earnings
  Currency
translation
adjustment
  Treasury shares Shareholders’
equity - Group
share
  

Non-controlling
interests

  Total
shareholders’
equity
  Common shares
issued
 Paid-in surplus
and retained
earnings
  Currency
translation
adjustment
  Treasury shares Shareholders’
equity-Group
share
  Non-controlling
interests
  Total
shareholders’
equity
 
(M) Number Amount Number Amount 

As of Janurary 1, 2009

  2,371,808,074    5,930    52,947    (4,876  (143,082,095  (5,009  48,992    958    49,950  

Net income 2009

          8,447                8,447    182    8,629  

Other comprehensive income (Note 17)

          246    (193          53    60    113  

Comprehensive income

          8,693    (193          8,500    242    8,742  

Dividend

          (5,086              (5,086  (189  (5,275

Issuance of common shares (Note 17)

  1,414,810    3    38                41        41  

Purchase of treasury shares

                                    

Sale of treasury shares(a)

          (143      2,874,905    165    22        22  

Share-based payments (Note 25)

          106                106        106  

Share cancellation (Note 17)

  (24,800,000  (62  (1,160      24,800,000    1,222              

Other operations with non-controlling interests

          (23              (23  (24  (47

Other items

                                    

As of December 31, 2009

  2,348,422,884    5,871    55,372    (5,069  (115,407,190  (3,622  52,552    987    53,539  

Net income 2010

          10,571                10,571    236    10,807  

Other comprehensive income (Note 17)

          (216  2,581            2,365    9    2,374  

Comprehensive income

          10,355    2,581            12,936    245    13,181  

Dividend

          (5,098              (5,098  (152  (5,250

Issuance of common shares (Note 17)

  1,218,047    3    38                41        41  

Purchase of treasury shares

                                    

Sale of treasury shares(a)

          (70      2,919,511    119    49        49  

Share-based payments (Note 25)

          140                140        140  

Share cancellation (Note 17)

                                    

Other operations with non-controlling interests

          (199  (7          (206  (223  (429

Other items

                                    

As of December 31, 2010

  2,349,640,931    5,874    60,538    (2,495  (112,487,679  (3,503  60,414    857    61,271  
(M€) Number Amount Paid-in surplus
and retained
earnings
  Currency
translation
adjustment
  Number Amount Shareholders’
equity-Group
share
  Non-controlling
interests
  Total
shareholders’
equity
 

As of January 1, 2011 before IAS 19 R application

  2,349,640,931    5,874    (112,487,679  (3,503 

IAS 19 R impacts

          (766              (766  (1  (767

As of January 1, 2011 after IAS 19 R
application

  2,349,640,931    5,874    59,772    (2,495  (112,487,679  (3,503  59,648    856    60,504  

Net income 2011

          12,276                12,276    305    12,581            12,309                12,309    305    12,614  

Other comprehensive income (Note 17)

          231    1,404            1,635    44    1,679            (112  1,388            1,276    45    1,321  

Comprehensive income

          12,507    1,404            13,911    349    14,260  

Comprehensive Income

          12,197    1,388            13,585    350    13,935  

Dividend

          (6,457              (6,457  (172  (6,629          (6,457              (6,457  (172  (6,629

Issuance of common shares (Note 17)

  14,126,382    35    446                481        481    14,126,382    35    446                481        481  

Purchase of treasury shares

                                                                        

Sale of treasury shares(a)

          (113      2,933,506    113                        (113      2,933,506    113              

Share-based payments (Note 25)

          161                161        161            161                161        161  

Share cancellation (Note 17)

                                                                        

Other operations with non-controlling interests

          (553  103            (450  (123  (573          (553  103            (450  (123  (573

Other items

          (23              (23  441    418            (23              (23  441    418  

As of December 31, 2011

  2,363,767,313    5,909    66,506    (988  (109,554,173  (3,390  68,037    1,352    69,389    2,363,767,313    5,909    65,430    (1,004  (109,554,173  (3,390  66,945    1,352    68,297  

Net income 2012

          10,609                10,609    147    10,756  

Other comprehensive income (Note 17)

          (769  (506          (1,275  (40  (1,315

Comprehensive Income

          9,840    (506          9,334    107    9,441  

Dividend

          (5,237              (5,237  (104  (5,341

Issuance of common shares (Note 17)

  2,165,833    6    26                32        32  

Purchase of treasury shares

                  (1,800,000  (68  (68      (68

Sale of treasury shares(a)

          (116      2,962,534    116              

Share-based payments (Note 25)

          146                146        146  

Share cancellation (Note 17)

                                    

Other operations with non-controlling interests

          11    6            17    (16  1  

Other items

          16                16    (59  (43

As of December 31, 2012

  2,365,933,146    5,915    70,116    (1,504  (108,391,639  (3,342  71,185    1,280    72,465  

Net income 2013

          8,440                8,440    221    8,661  

Other comprehensive income (Note 17)

          360    (2,890          (2,530  (138  (2,668

Comprehensive Income

          8,800    (2,890          5,910    83    5,993  

Dividend

          (5,358              (5,358  (118  (5,476

Issuance of common shares (Note 17)

  11,745,014    29    336                365        365  

Purchase of treasury shares

                  (4,414,200  (179  (179      (179

Sale of treasury shares(a)

          (142      3,591,391    142              

Share-based payments (Note 25)

          142                142        142  

Share cancellation (Note 17)

                                    

Other operations with non-controlling interests

          548    9            557    1,027    1,584  

Other items

          7                7    9    16  

As of December 31, 2013

  2,377,678,160    5,944    74,449    (4,385  (109,214,448  (3,379  72,629    2,281    74,910  

 

(a)Treasury shares related to the stock option purchase plans and restricted stock grants.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-7


TOTAL

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

On February 9, 2012,11, 2014, the Board of Directors established and authorized the publication of the Consolidated Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, which will be submitted for approval to the shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 11, 2012.16, 2014.

INTRODUCTION

The Consolidated Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. and its subsidiaries (the Group) are presented in Euros and have been prepared on the basis of IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) as adopted by the European Union and IFRS as issued by the IASB (International Accounting Standard Board) as of December 31, 2011.2013.

The accounting principles applied in the Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 20112013 were the same as those that were used as of December 31, 20102012 except for amendments and interpretations of IFRS which were mandatory for the periods beginning after January 1, 20112013 (and not early adopted). Their adoption has no material

The revised standard IAS 19 “Employee benefits” applicable retrospectively from January 1, 2013, led in particular to the full recognition of the net position in respect of employee benefits obligations (liabilities net of assets) in the balance sheet, to the elimination of the corridor approach previously used by the Group, the elimination of the depreciation of past services costs, and to the obligation to evaluate the expected return on plan assets on a normative basis (via the discount rate used to value the debt).

The application of this standard had an impact on January 1, 2013, on January 1, 2012 and on January 1, 2011 of an increase in employee benefit provisions of2.8 billion,1.8 billion and1.3 billion respectively, and a respective decrease in equity of2.8 billion,1.8 billion and1.3 billion before tax (1.7 billion,1.1 billion and0.8 billion after tax). The impact on the Consolidatedprofit for 2012 and 2011 is not significant. In accordance with the transitional rules of IAS 19 revised, the comparative periods were restated to take into account the retrospective application of the standard.

Application of standards on consolidation: IFRS 10 “Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements”, IFRS 11 “Joint arrangements”, IFRS 12 “Disclosure of interests in other entities”, IAS 27 revised “Separate financial statements” and IAS 28 revised “Investments in

associates and joint ventures”. The application of these standards did not have a material effect on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet, income statement and shareholder’s equity as of December 31, 2013.

The application of standards IFRS 13 “Fair value measurement” and IAS 1 revised “Presentation of financial statements” did not have a material effect on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet, statement of income and shareholder’s equity as of December 31, 2011.2013.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the date of preparation of the financial statements and reported income and expenses for the period. The management reviews these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, by reference to past experience and various other factors considered as reasonable which form the basis for assessing the carrying amount of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates, if different assumptions or circumstances apply. These judgments and estimates relate principally to the application of the successful efforts method for the oil and gas accounting, the valuation of long-lived assets, the provisions for asset retirement obligations and environmental remediation, the pensions and post-retirements benefits and the income tax computation.

Furthermore, where the accounting treatment of a specific transaction is not addressed by any accounting standard or interpretation, the management applies its judgment to

define and apply accounting policies that will lead to relevantprovide information consistent with the general IFRS concepts: faithful representation, relevance and reliable information, so thatmateriality.

CHANGE IN PRESENTATION CURRENCY OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

To make the financial statements:information of the Group more readable and to better reflect the performance of its activities mainly carried out in U.S. dollars, Total decided to change, effective January 1, 2014, the presentation currency of the Consolidated Financial Statements from the euro to the U.S. dollar. The financial statements of TOTAL S.A., the parent company of the Group, remain prepared in euro. The dividend paid therefore remains fixed in euro.

 

F-8TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


give a true and fair view ofFollowing this change in accounting policy, the Group’scomparative consolidated financial position, financial performance and cash flows;

reflect the substance of transactions;

are neutral;

are prepared on a prudent basis; and

are completestatements will be presented in all material aspects.U.S. dollars.

1)ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Pursuant to the accrual basis of accounting followed by the Group, the financial statements reflect the effects of transactions and other events when they occur. Assets and liabilities such as property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are usually measured at amortized cost. Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value when required by the standards.

Accounting policies used by the Group are described below:

 

A) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

SubsidiariesEntities that are directly controlled by the parent company or indirectly controlled by other consolidated subsidiariesentities are fully consolidated.

Investments in jointly-controlled entitiesjoint ventures are consolidated under the equity method. The Group accounts for jointly-controlledjoint operations and jointly-controlled assets by recognisingrecognizing its share of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.

Investments in associates, in which the Group has significant influence, are accounted for by the equity method. Significant influence is presumed when the Group holds, directly or indirectly (e.g. through subsidiaries), 20% or more of the voting rights. Companies in which ownership interest is less than 20%, but over which the Company is deemed to exercise significant influence, are also accounted for by the equity method.

All significant intercompany balances, transactions and income are eliminated.

B) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. This method impliesrequires the recognition of the acquired identifiable assets, assumed liabilities and any non-controlling interests in the companies acquired by the Group at their fair value.

The value of the purchase price is finalized within one year from the acquisition date.

The acquirer shall recognize goodwill at the acquisition date, being the excess of:

 

The consideration transferred, the amount of non-controlling interests and, in business combinations achieved in stages, the fair value at the acquisition date of the investment previously held in the acquired company;

Over the fair value at the acquisition date of acquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities.

If the consideration transferred is lower than the fair value of acquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities, an additional analysis is performed on the identification and valuation of the identifiable elements of the assets and liabilities. AnyAfter having completed such additional analysis any residual badwillnegative goodwill is recorded as income.

In transactions with non-controlling interests, the difference between the price paid (received) and the book value of non-controlling interests acquired (sold) is recognized directly in equity.

The purchase price allocation is finalized within one year from the acquisition date.

Non-monetary contributions by venturers to a jointly-controlled entity in exchange for an equity interest in the jointly-controlled entity are accounted for by applying guidance provided in SIC 13 “Jointly Controlled Entities — Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers”. A gain or loss on disposal of the previously held investment is recorded up to the share of the co-venturer in the jointly controlled entity.

 

C) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared in the currency that most clearly reflects their business environment. This is referred to as their functional currency.

 

(i)Monetary transactions

Transactions denominated in foreign currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are translated at the exchange rate on the transaction date. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate and the resulting exchange differences are recognized in the statement of income.

(ii)Translation of financial statements denominated in foreign currencies

Assets and liabilities of foreign entities are translated into euros on the basis of the exchange rates at the end of the period. The income and cash flow statements are translated using the average exchange rates for the period. Foreign exchange differences resulting from such translations are either recorded in shareholders’ equity under “Currency translation adjustments” (for the Group share) or under “Non-controlling interests” (for the share of non-controlling interests) as deemed appropriate.appropriate.

 

D) SALES AND REVENUES FROM SALES

Sales figures include excise taxes collected by the Group within the course of its oil distribution operations. Excise taxes are deducted from sales in order to obtain the “Revenues from sales” indicator.

 

(i)Sale of goods

Revenues from sales are recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been passed to the buyer and when the amount is recoverable and can be reasonably measured.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-9


Revenues from sales of crude oil, natural gas and coal are recorded upon transfer of title, according to the terms of the sales contracts.

Revenues from the production of crude oil and natural gas properties, in which the Group has an interest with other producers, are recognized based on actual volumes sold during the period. Any difference between volumes sold and entitlement volumes, based on the Group net working interest, is recognized as “Crude oil and natural gas inventories” or “Other current assets” or “Other creditors and accrued liabilities”, as appropriate.

Quantities delivered that represent production royalties and taxes, when paid in cash, are included in oil and gas sales, except for the United States and Canada.

Certain transactions within the trading activities (contracts involving quantities that are purchased tofrom third parties then resold to third parties) are shown at their net value in sales.

Exchanges of crude oil and petroleum products within normal trading activities do not generate any income and therefore these flows are shown at their net value in both the statement of income and the balance sheet.

 

(ii)Sale of services

Revenues from services are recognized when the services have been rendered.

Revenues from gas transport are recognized when services are rendered. These revenues are based on the quantities transported and measured according to procedures defined in each service contract.

Shipping revenues and expenses from time-charter activities are recognized on a pro rata basis over a period that commences upon the unloading of the previous voyage and terminates upon the unloading of the current voyage. Shipping revenue recognition starts only when a charter has been agreed to by both the Group and the customer.

 

(iii)Solar Farm Development Projects

SunPower develops and sells solar farm projects. This activity generally contains a property component (land ownership or an interest in land rights). The revenue associated with the development of these projects is recognized when the entities-projects and land rights are irrevocably sold.

Revenues under contracts for construction of solar systems are recognized based on the progress of

construction works, measured according to the percentage of costs incurred relative to total forecast costs.

E) SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

The Group may grant employees stock options, create employee share purchase plans and offer its employees the opportunity to subscribe to reserved capital increases. These employee benefits are recognized as expenses with a corresponding credit to shareholders’ equity.

The expense is equal to the fair value of the instruments granted. The expense is recognized on a straight-line basis between the grant date and vesting date.

The fair value of the options is calculated using the Black-Scholes model at the grant date. The expense is recognized on a straight-line basis between the grant date and vesting date.

For restricted share plans, the expensefair value is calculated using the market price at the grant date after deducting the expected distribution rate during the vesting period.

The number of allocated equity instruments can be revised during the vesting period in cases of non-compliance with performance conditions, with the exception of those related to the market, or according to the rate of turnover of the beneficiaries.

The cost of employee-reserved capital increases is immediately expensed. A discount reduces the expense in order to account for the nontransferabilitynon-transferability of the shares awarded to the employees over a period of five years.

 

F) INCOME TAXES

Income taxes disclosed in the statement of income include the current tax expenses and the deferred tax expenses.

The Group uses the method whereby deferred income taxes are recorded based on the temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recorded in the balance sheet and their tax bases, and on carry-forwards of unused tax losses and tax credits.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates that have been enacted or substantially enacted at the balance sheet date. The tax rates used depend on the timing of reversals of temporary differences, tax losses and other tax credits. The effect of a change in tax rate is recognized either in the Consolidated Statementconsolidated statement of Incomeincome or in shareholders’ equity depending on the item it relates to.

Deferred tax assets are recognized when future recovery is probable.

F-10TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Asset retirement obligations and finance leases give rise to the recognition of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes as described in paragraph K “Leases” and paragraph Q “Asset retirement obligations” of this Note. Deferred income taxes resulting from temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of such assets and liabilities are recognized.

Deferred tax liabilitiestaxes resulting from temporary differences between the carrying amounts of equity-method investments and their tax bases are recognized. The deferred tax calculation is based on the expected future tax effect (dividend distribution raterates or tax raterates on the gain or loss upon disposal of these investments)capital gains).

 

G) EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (Group share) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A. (Treasury shares) and TOTAL shares held by the Group subsidiaries which are deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (Group share) by the fully-diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Treasury shares held by the parent company, TOTAL S.A., and TOTAL shares held by the Group subsidiaries are deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity. These shares are not considered outstanding for purposes of this calculation which also takes into account the dilutive effect of stock options, share grants and capital increases with a subscription period closing after the end of the fiscal year.

The weighted-average number of fully-diluted shares is calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method provided for by IAS 33. The proceeds, which would be recovered in the event of an exercise of rights related to dilutive instruments, are presumed to be a share buyback at the average market price over the period. The number of shares thereby obtained leads to a reduction in the total number of shares that would result from the exercise of rights.

H) OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCING PROPERTIES AND MINING ACTIVITY

H)OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCING PROPERTIES

The Group applies IFRS 6 “Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources”. Oil and gas exploration and production properties and assets are accounted for in accordance with the successful efforts method.

(i)Exploration costs

Geological and geophysical costs, including seismic surveys for exploration purposes are expensed as incurred.

Mineral interests are capitalized as intangible assets when acquired. These acquired interests are tested for impairment on a regular basis, property-by-property, based on the results of the exploratory activity and the management’s evaluation.

In the event of a discovery, the unproved mineral interests are transferred to proved mineral interests at their net book value as soon as proved reserves are booked.

Exploratory wells are tested for impairment on a well-by-well basis and accounted for as follows:

 

Costs of exploratory wells which result in proved reserves are capitalized and then depreciated using the unit-of-production method based on proved developed reserves;

 

Costs of dry exploratory wells and wells that have not found proved reserves are charged to expense;

 

Costs of exploratory wells are temporarily capitalized until a determination is made as to whether the well has found proved reserves if both of the following conditions are met:

 

The well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well, if appropriate, assuming that the required capital expenditures are made;

The well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well, if appropriate, assuming that the required capital expenditures are made;

 

The Group is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. This progress is evaluated on the basis of indicators such as whether additional exploratory works are under way or firmly planned (wells, seismic or significant studies), whether costs are being incurred for development studies and whether the Group is waiting for governmental or other third-party authorization of a proposed project, or availability of capacity on an existing transport or processing facility.

The Group is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. This progress is evaluated on the basis of indicators such as whether additional exploratory works are under way or firmly planned (wells, seismic or significant studies), whether costs are being incurred for development studies and whether the Group is waiting for governmental or other third-party authorization of a proposed project, or availability of capacity on an existing transport or processing facility.

Costs of exploratory wells not meeting these conditions are charged to expense.

 

(ii)Oil and Gas producing assets

Development costs incurred for the drilling of development wells and for the construction of production and treatment facilities are capitalized, together with borrowing costs incurred during

the period of construction and the present value of estimated future costs of asset retirement obligations. The depletion rate is usually equal to the ratio of oil and gas production for the period to proved developed reserves (unit-of-production method).

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-11


With respect to production sharing contracts, this computation is based on the portion of production and reserves assigned to the Group taking into account estimates based on the contractual clauses regarding the reimbursement of exploration, development and production costs (cost oil) as well as the sharing of hydrocarbon rights (profit oil).

Transportation assets are depreciated using the unit-of-production method based on throughput or by using the straight-line method whichever best reflects the duration of use of the economic life of the asset.

Proved mineral interests are depreciated using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves.

 

(iii)I)Mining activityGOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS EXCLUDING MINERAL INTERESTS

Before an assessment can be made on the existence of resources, exploration costs, including studies and core drilling campaigns as a whole, are expensed.

When the assessment concludes that resources exist, the costs engaged subsequently to this assessment are capitalized temporarily while waiting for the field final development decision, if a positive decision is highly probable. Otherwise, these costs are expensed.

Once the development decision is taken, the predevelopment costs capitalized temporarily are integrated with the cost of development and depreciated from the start of production at the same pace than development assets.

Mining development costs include the initial stripping costs and all costs incurred to access resources, and particularly the costs of:

Surface infrastructures;

Machinery and mobile equipment which are significantly costly;

Utilities and off-sites.

These costs are capitalized and depreciated either on a straight line basis or depleted using the UOP method from the start of production.

I) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS EXCLUDING MINERAL INTERESTS

Other intangible assets include goodwill, patents, trademarks, and lease rights.

Intangible assets are carried at cost, after deducting any accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

Guidance for calculating goodwill is presented in Note 1 paragraph B to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or as soon as there is any indication of impairment (see Note 1 paragraph L to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In equity affiliates, goodwill is included in the investment book value.

Other intangible assets (except goodwill) have a finite useful life and are amortized on a straight-line basis over 3 to 20 years depending on the useful life of the assets.

Research and development

Research costs are charged to expense as incurred.

Development expenses are capitalized when the following can be demonstrated:

 

the technical feasibility of the project and the availability of the adequate resources for the completion of the intangible asset;

 

the ability of the asset to generate probable future economic benefits;

 

the ability to measure reliably the expenditures attributable to the asset; and

the feasibility and intention of the Group to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it.

Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred.

 

J) OTHER PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Other property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, after deducting any accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. This cost includes borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition or production of a qualifying asset incurred until assets are placed in service. Borrowing costs are capitalized as follows:

 

if the project benefits from a specific funding, the capitalization of borrowing costs is based on the borrowing rate;

 

if the project is financed by all the Group’s debt, the capitalization of borrowing costs is based on the weighted average borrowing cost for the period.

Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The costs of major turnarounds of refineries

and large petrochemical units are capitalized as incurred and depreciated over the period of time between two consecutive major turnarounds.

Other property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over their useful lives, which are as follows:

 

•     Furniture, office equipment, machinery and tools

   3-12 years  

•     Transportation equipments

   5-20 years  

•     Storage tanks and related equipment

   10-15 years  

•     Specialized complex installations and pipelines

   10-30 years  

•     Buildings

   10-50 years  

 

K) LEASES

A finance lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership from the lessor to the lessee. These contracts are capitalized as assets at fair value or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments according to the contract. A corresponding financial debt is recognized as a financial liability. These assets are depreciated over the corresponding useful life used by the Group.

Leases that are not finance leases as defined above are recorded as operating leases.

F-12TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Certain arrangements do not take the legal form of a lease but convey the right to use an asset or a group of assets in return for fixed payments. Such arrangements are accounted for as leases and are analyzed to determine whether they should be classified as operating leases or as finance leases.

 

L) IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The recoverable amounts of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are tested for impairment as soon as any indication of impairment exists. This test is performed at least annually for goodwill.

The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value (less costs to sell) or its value in use.

Assets are grouped into cash-generating units (or CGUs) and tested. A cash-generating unit is a homogeneous group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other groups of assets.

The value in use of a CGU is determined by reference to the discounted expected future cash flows, based upon the management’s expectation of future economic and operating conditions. When this value is less than the carrying amount of the CGU, an impairment loss is

recorded. It is allocated first to goodwill in counterpart of “Other expenses”. These impairment losses are then allocated to “Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests” for property, plant and mineral interests and to “Other expenses” for other intangible assets.

Impairment losses recognized in prior periods can be reversed up to the original carrying amount, had the impairment loss not been recognized. Impairment losses recognized for goodwill cannot be reversed.

 

M) FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Financial assets and liabilities are financial loans and receivables, investments in non-consolidated companies, publicly traded equity securities, derivatives instruments and current and non-current financial liabilities.

The accounting treatment of these financial assets and liabilities is as follows:

 

(i)Loans and receivables

Financial loans and receivables are recognized at amortized cost. They are tested for impairment, by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to estimates of the discounted future recoverable cash flows. These tests are conducted as soon as there is any evidence that

their fair value is less than their carrying amount, and at least annually. Any impairment loss is recorded in the statement of income.

 

(ii)Other investments

These assets are classified as financial assets available for sale and therefore measured at their fair value. For listed securities, this fair value is equal to the market price. For unlisted securities, if the fair value is not reliably determinable, securities are recorded at their historical value. Changes in fair value are recorded in shareholders’ equity. If there is any evidence of a significant or long-lasting impairment loss, a loss is recorded in the Statementstatement of Income.income. This impairment is reversed in the statement of income only when the securities are sold.irreversible.

 

(iii)Derivative instruments

The Group uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to risks of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recognized in the statement of income or in shareholders’ equity and are recognized in the balance sheet in the accounts corresponding to their nature, according to the risk management strategy described in Note 31 to the

Consolidated Financial Statements. The derivative instruments used by the Group are the following:

 

 

Cash management

Financial instruments used for cash management purposes are part of a hedging strategy of currency and interest rate risks within global limits set by the Group and are considered to be used for transactions (held for trading). Changes in fair value are systematically recorded in the statement of income. The balance sheet value of those instruments is included in “Current financial assets” or “Other current financial liabilities”.

 

 

Long-term financing

When an external long-term financing is set up, specifically to finance subsidiaries, and when this financing involves currency and interest rate derivatives, these instruments are qualified as:

 

 i.Fair value hedge of the interest rate risk on the external debt and of the currency risk of the loans to subsidiaries. Changes in fair value of derivatives are recognized in the statement of income as are changes in fair value of underlying financial debts and loans to subsidiaries.

The fair value of those hedging instruments of long-term financing is included in the assets under “Hedging

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-13


“Hedging instruments on non-current financial debt” or in the liabilities under “Non-current financial debt “for the non-current portion. The current portion (less than one year) is accounted for in “Current financial assets” or “Other current financial liabilities”.

In case of the anticipated termination of derivative instruments accounted for as fair value hedges, the amount paid or received is recognized in the statement of income and:

 

If this termination is due to an early cancellation of the hedged items, the adjustment previously recorded as revaluation of those hedged items is also recognized in the statement of income;

If this termination is due to an early cancellation of the hedged items, the adjustment previously recorded as revaluation of those hedged items is also recognized in the statement of income;

 

If the hedged items remain in the balance sheet, the adjustment previously recorded as a revaluation of those hedged items is spread over the remaining life of those items.

If the hedged items remain in the balance sheet, the adjustment previously recorded as a revaluation of those hedged items is spread over the remaining life of those items.

 

 ii.

Cash flow hedge of the currency risk of the external debt. Changes in fair value are recorded in equityOther comprehensive Income for the effective portion of the hedging and in the statement of income for the ineffective portion of the hedging. Amounts recorded in

equity are transferred to the income statement when the hedged transaction affects profit or loss.

The fair value of those hedging instruments of long-term financing is included in the assets under “Hedging instruments on non-current financial debt” or in the liabilities under “Non-current financial debt” for the non-current portion. The current portion (less than one year) is accounted for in “Current financial assets” or “Other current financial liabilities”.

If the hedging instrument expires, is sold or terminated by anticipation, gains or losses previously recognized in equity remain in equity. Amounts are recycled in the income statement only when the hedged transaction affects profit or loss.

 

 

Foreign subsidiaries’ equity hedge

Certain financial instruments hedge against risks related to the equity of foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the euro (mainly the dollar). These instruments qualify as “net investment hedges”. Changes and changes in fair value are recorded in shareholders’ equity.Other comprehensive income for the effective portion of the

hedging and in the statement of income for the ineffective portion of the hedging. Gains or losses on hedging instruments previously recorded in equity, are reclassified to the statement of income in the same period as the total or partial disposal of the foreign activity.

The fair value of these instruments is recorded under “Current financial assets” or “Other current financial liabilities”.

 

 

Financial instruments related to commodity contracts

Financial instruments related to commodity contracts, including crude oil, petroleum products, gas, power and coal purchase/sales contracts within the trading activities, together with the commodity contract derivative instruments such as energy contracts and forward freight agreements, are used to adjust the Group’s exposure to price fluctuations within global trading limits. According to the industry practice, these instruments are considered as held for trading. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of income. The fair value of these instruments is recorded in “Other current assets” or “Other creditors and accrued liabilities” depending on whether they are assets or liabilities.

Detailed information about derivatives positions is disclosed in Notes 20, 28, 29, 30 and 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

(iv)Current and non-current financial liabilities

Current and non-current financial liabilities (excluding derivatives) are recognized at amortized cost, except those

for which a hedge accounting can be applied as described in the previous paragraph.

 

(v)Fair value of financial instruments

Fair values are estimated for the majority of the Group’s financial instruments, with the exception of publicly traded equity securities and marketable securities for which the market price is used.

EstimatedEstimations of fair values,value, which are based on principles such as discounting future cash flows to present value, must be weighted by the fact that the value of a financial instrument at a given time may be influenced by the market environment (liquidity especially), and also the fact that subsequent changes in interest rates and exchange rates are not taken into account.

As a consequence, the use of different estimates, methodologies and assumptions could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

F-14TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


The methods used are as follows:

 

 

Financial debts, swaps

The market value of swaps and of bonds that are hedged by those swaps has been determined on an individual basis by discounting future cash flows with the zero coupon interest rate curves existing atyear-end.

 

 

Financial instruments related to commodity contracts

The valuation methodology is to mark to market all open positions for both physical and paper transactions. The valuations are determined on a daily basis using observable market data based on organized and over the counter (OTC) markets. In particular cases when market data are not directly available, the valuations are derived from observable data such as arbitrages, freight or spreads and market corroboration. For valuation of risks which are the result of a calculation, such as options for example, commonly known models are used to compute the fair value.

 

 

Other financial instruments

The fair value of the interest rate swaps and of FRAFRAs (Forward Rate Agreement)Agreements) are calculated by discounting future cash flows on the basis of zero coupon interest rate curves existing at year-end after adjustment for interest accrued but unpaid.

Forward exchange contracts and currency swaps are valued on the basis of a comparison of the negociated

forward rates with the rates in effect on the financial markets at year-end for similar maturities.

Exchange options are valued based on the Garman-Kohlhagen model including market quotations atyear-end.

 

 

Fair value hierarchy

IFRS 7 “Financial instruments: disclosures”, amended in 2009, introduces a fair value hierarchy for financial instruments and proposes the following three-level classification :classification:

 

level 1: quotations for assets and liabilities (identical to the ones that are being valued) obtained at the valuation date on an active market to which the entity has access;

level 1: quotations for assets and liabilities (identical to the ones that are being valued) obtained at the valuation date on an active market to which the entity has access;

 

level 2: the entry data are observable data but do not correspond to quotations for identical assets or liabilities;

level 2: the entry data are observable data but do not correspond to quotations for identical assets or liabilities;

level 3: the entry data are not observable data. For example: these data come from extrapolation. This level applies when there is no market or observable data and the company has to use its own hypotheses to estimate the data that other market players would have used to determine the fair value of the asset.

level 3: the entry data are not observable data. For example: these data come from extrapolation. This level applies when there is no market or observable data and the company has to use its own hypotheses to estimate the data that other market players would have used to determine the fair value of the asset.

Fair value hierarchy is disclosed in Notes 29 and 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(vi)Commitments to purchase shares held by non-controlling interests (put options written on minority interests)

Put options granted to non-controlling-interest shareholders are initially recognized as financial liabilities at the present value of the exercise price of the options with a corresponding reduction in shareholders’ equity. The financial liability is subsequently measured at fair value at each balance sheet date in accordance with contractual clauses and any variation is recorded in the statement of income (cost of debt).

 

N) INVENTORIES

Inventories are measured in the Consolidated Financial Statements at the lower of historical cost or market value. Costs for petroleum and petrochemical products are determined according to the FIFO (First-In, First-Out) method and other inventories are measured using the weighted-average cost method. In addition stocks held for trading are measured at fair value less costs of sale.

Downstream (Refining — Marketing)Refining & Chemicals

Petroleum product inventories are mainly comprised of crude oil and refined products. Refined products principally consist of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, fuel oil and heating oil produced by the Group’s refineries. The turnover of petroleum products does not exceed more than two months on average.

Crude oil costs include raw material and receiving costs. Refining costs principally include the crude oil costs, production costs (energy, labor, depreciation of producing assets) and an allocation of production overheadoverheads (taxes, maintenance, insurance, etc.). Start-up costs and general administrative costs are excluded from the cost price of refined products.

Chemicals

Costs of chemical productsproduct inventories consist of raw material costs, direct labor costs and an allocation of production overhead.overheads. Start-up costs, and general administrative costs and financing costs are excluded from the cost price of inventories ofrefined and chemicals products.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-15


Marketing & Services

The costs of refined products include mainly crude oil costs, production costs (energy, labor, depreciation of producing assets) and an allocation of production overheads (taxes, maintenance, insurance, etc.).

Start-up costs, general administrative costs and financing costs are excluded from the cost price of refined products.

Product inventories purchased from entities external to the Group are valued at their purchase cost plus primary costs of transport.

 

O) TREASURY SHARES

Treasury shares of the parent company held by its subsidiaries or itself are deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity. Gains or losses on sales of treasury shares are excluded from the determination of net income and are recognized in shareholders’ equity.

 

P) PROVISIONS AND OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

Provisions and non-current liabilities are comprised of liabilities for which the amount and the timing are uncertain. They arise from environmental risks, legal and tax risks, litigation and other risks.

A provision is recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event for which it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required and when a reliable estimate can be made regarding the amount of the obligation. The amount of the liability corresponds to the best possible estimate.

Provisions and non-current liabilities are comprised of liabilities for which the amount and the timing are uncertain. They arise from environmental risks, legal and tax risks, litigation and other risks.

 

Q) ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

Asset retirement obligations, which result from a legal or constructive obligation, are recognized based on a reasonable estimate in the period in which the obligation arises.

The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the underlying asset and depreciated over the useful life of this asset.

An entity is required to measure changes in the liability for an asset retirement obligation due to the passage of time (accretion) by applying a risk-free discount rate to the amount of the liability. The increase of the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as “Other financial expense”.

 

R) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

In accordance with the laws and practices of each country, the Group participates in employee benefit plans offering

retirement, death and disability, healthcare and special termination benefits. These plans provide benefits based on various factors such as length of service, salaries, and contributions made to the governmental bodies responsible for the payment of benefits.

These plans can be either defined contribution or defined benefit pension plans and may be entirely or partially funded with investments made in various non-Group instruments such as mutual funds, insurance contracts, and other instruments.

For defined contribution plans, expenses correspond to the contributions paid.

Defined benefit obligations are determined according to the Projected Unit Method. Actuarial gains and losses may arise from differences between actuarial valuation and projected commitments (depending on new calculations or assumptions) and between projected and actual return of plan assets.

The Group applies the corridor method to amortize its actuarial gains and losses. This method amortizes the net cumulative actuarial Such gains and losses that exceed 10% of the greater of the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at the opening balance sheet date, over the average expected remaining working lives of the employees participatingare recognized in the plan.statement of comprehensive income, with no possibility to subsequently recycle them to the income statement.

In case of a change in or creation of a plan, the vested portion of theThe past service cost of past services is recorded immediately in the statement of income, and the unvested past service cost is amortized over the vesting period.whether vested or unvested.

The net periodic pension cost is recognized under “Other operating expenses”.

 

S) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows prepared in foreign currencies has been translated into euros using the exchange rate on the transaction date or the average exchange rate for the period. Currency translation differences arising from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency into euros using the closing exchange rates are shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows under “Effect of exchange rates”. Therefore, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows will not agree with the figures derived from the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash on hand and highly liquid short-term investments that are easily convertible into known amounts of cash and are subject to insignificant risks of changes in value.

Investments with maturitymaturities greater than three months and less than twelve months are shown under “Current financial assets”.

Changes in current financial assets and liabilities are included in the financing activities section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

F-16TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Non-current financial debt

Changes in non-current financial debt are presented as the net variation to reflect significant changes mainly related to revolving credit agreements.

 

T) CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION RIGHTS

In the absence of a current IFRS standard or interpretation on accounting for emission rights of carbon dioxide, the following principles are applied:

 

Emission rights are managed as a cost of production and as such are recognized in inventories:

 

Emission rights allocated for free are booked in inventories with a nil carrying amount,

Emission rights allocated for free are booked in inventories with a nil carrying amount,

 

Purchased emission rights are booked at acquisition cost,

Purchased emission rights are booked at acquisition cost,

 

Sales or annual restorations of emission rights consist of decreases in inventories recognized based on a weighted average cost,

Sales or annual restorations of emission rights consist of decreases in inventories recognized based on a weighted average cost,

 

If the carrying amount of inventories at closing date is higher than the market value, an impairment loss is recorded.

If the carrying amount of inventories at closing date is higher than the market value, an impairment loss is recorded.

 

At each closing, a provision is recorded in order to materialize the obligation of emission rights restoration related to the emissions of the period. This provision is calculated based on estimated emissions of the period, valued at weighted average cost of the inventories at the end of the period. It is reversed when the emission rights are restored.

 

If emission rights to be delivered at the end of the compliance period are higher than emission rights (allocated and purchased) booked in inventories, the shortage is accounted for as a liability at market value.

 

Forward transactions are recognized at their fair market value in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of such forward transactions are recognized in the statement of income.

 

U) ENERGY SAVINGS CERTIFICATES

In the absence of current IFRS standards or interpretations on accounting for energy savings certificates, the following principles are applied:

If the obligations linked to the sales of energy are greater than the number of ESC’s held then a liability is recorded. These liabilities are valued based on the price of the latest transactions.

In the event that the number of ESC’s held exceeds the obligation at the balance sheet date this is accounted for as inventory.

ESC inventories are valued at weighted average cost (acquisition cost for those ESC acquired or cost incurred for those ESC generated internally).

If the carrying value of the inventory of certificates at the balance sheet date is higher than the market value, an impairment loss is recorded in income

V)NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Pursuant to IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations”, assets and liabilities of affiliates that are held for sale are presented separately on the face of the balance sheet. Depreciation of assets ceases from the date of classifcation in “Non-current assets held for sale”.

Net income from discontinued operations is presented separately on the face of the statement of income. Therefore, the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements related to the statement of income only refer to continuing operations.

A discontinued operation is a component of the Group for which cash flows are independent. It represents a major line of business or geographical area of operations which has been disposed of or is currently being held for sale.

 

V)W) ALTERNATIVE IFRS METHODSNEW ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES NOT YET IN EFFECT

For measuring and recognizing assets and liabilities, the following choices among alternative methods allowable under IFRS have been made:

property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets are measured using historical cost model instead of revaluation model;

actuarial gains and losses on pension and other post-employment benefit obligations are recognized according to the corridor method (see Note 1 paragraph R to the Consolidated Financial Statements);

jointly-controlled entities are consolidated under the equity method, as provided for in the alternative method of IAS 31 “Interests in joint ventures”.

W) NEW ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES NOT YET IN EFFECT

The standards or interpretations published respectively by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) which were not yet in effect andat December 31, 2013, are as follows:

Standards not yet adopted by the European Union at December 31, 2011, are as follows:

In November 2009, the IASB issued standard IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” that introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets, and included in October 2010 requirements regarding classification and measurement of financial liabilities. This standard shall be completed with texts on impairment and hedge accounting. Under standard IFRS 9, financial assets and liabilities are generally measured either at fair value through profit or loss or at amortised cost if certain conditions are met. The standard should be applicable for annual periods starting on or after January 1, 2015. The application of the standard as published in 2010 should not have any material effect on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet, statement of income and shareholder’s equity.

In May 2011, the IASB issued a package of standards on consolidation : standard IFRS 10 “Consolidated financial statements”, standard IFRS 11 “Joint arrangements”, standard IFRS 12 “Disclosure of interests in other entities”, revised standard IAS 27 “Separate financial statements” and revised standard IAS 28 “Investments in associates and joint ventures”. These standards are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The impact of the application of these standards is currently assessed by the Group.2013

 

In November 2009, the IASB issued standard IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” that introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets, and included in October 2010 requirements regarding classification and measurement of financial liabilities. This standard shall be completed with texts on impairment of financial assets measured at amortized cost and hedge accounting. Under standard IFRS 9, financial assets and liabilities are generally measured either at fair value through profit or loss or at amortized cost if certain conditions are met. The standard will not be applicable before 2017. The application of the standard as published in 2010 should not have any material effect on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet, statement of income and shareholder’s equity.

In June 2011, the IASB issued revised standard IAS 19 “Employee benefits”, which leads in particular to the full recognition of the net position in respect of employee benefits obligations (liabilities net of assets) in the balance sheet, to the elimination of the corridor approach currently used by the Group and to the obligation to evaluate the expected return on plan assets on a normative basis (via the discount rate used to value the debt). This standard is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The impact of the application of this standard is currently assessed by the Group.

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-17


In addition, the IASB published in May 2011 standard IFRS 13 “Fair value measurement”, applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and in June 2011 revised standard IAS 1 “Presentation of financial statements”, applicable for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012. The application of these standards should not have any material effect on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet, statement of income and shareholder’s equity.

In May 2013, the IASB issued the interpretation IFRIC 21 “Levies”. This interpretation is applicable retrospectively for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The impacts of the application of this interpretation are under review.

2)MAIN INDICATORS — INFORMATION BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

Performance indicators excluding the adjustment items, such as adjusted operating income, adjusted net operating income, and adjusted net income are meant to facilitate the analysis of the financial performance and the comparison of income between periods.

Adjustment items

The detail of these adjustment items is presented in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Adjustment items include :include:

 

(i)Special items

Due to their unusual nature or particular significance, certain transactions qualified as “special items” are excluded from the business segment figures. In general,

special items relate to transactions that are significant, infrequent or unusual. However, in certain instances, transactions such as restructuring costs or assets disposals, which are not considered to be representative of the normal course of business, may be qualified as special items although they may have occurred within prior years or are likely to occur again within the coming years.

 

(ii)The inventory valuation effect

The adjusted results of the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals and ChemicalsMarketing & Services segments are presented according to the replacement cost method. This method is used to assess the segments’ performance and facilitate the comparability of the segments’ performance with those of its competitors.

In the replacement cost method, which approximates the LIFO (Last-In, First-Out) method, the variation of inventory values in the statement of income is, depending on the nature of the inventory, determined using either the month-end prices differential between one period and another or the average prices of the period rather than the historical value. The inventory valuation effect is the difference between the results according to the FIFO (First-In, First-Out) and the replacement cost.

(iii)Effect of changes in fair value

As from January 1, 2011, theThe effect of changes in fair value presented as adjustment itemitems reflects for some transactions differences between internal measuremeasures of performance used by TOTAL’s management and the accounting for these transactions under IFRS.

IFRS requires that trading inventories be recorded at their fair value using period end spot prices. In order to best reflect the management of economic exposure through derivative transactions, internal indicators used to measure performance include valuations of trading inventories based on forward prices.

Furthermore, TOTAL, in its trading activities, enters into storage contracts, which future effects are recorded at fair value in Group’s internal economic performance. IFRS precludes recognition of this fair value effect.

(iv)Until June 30, 2010, TOTAL’s equity share of adjustment items reconciling “Business net income” to Net income attributable to equity holders of Sanofi (see Note 3, paragraph on the sales of Sanofi shares and loss of significant influence over Sanofi)

Main indicators

 

(i)Operating income (measure used to evaluate operating performance)

Revenue from sales after deducting cost of goods sold and inventory variations, other operating expenses,

exploration expenses and depreciation, depletion, and amortization.

Operating income excludes the amortization of intangible assets other than mineral interests, currency translation adjustments and gains or losses on the disposal of assets.

 

(ii)Net operating income (measure used to evaluate the return on capital employed)

Operating income after taking into account the amortization of intangible assets other than mineral interests, currency translation adjustments, gains or losses on the disposal of assets, as well as all other income and expenses related to capital employed (dividends from non-consolidated companies, equity in income of affiliates, capitalized interest expenses), and after income taxes applicable to the above.

The only income and expense not included in net operating income but included in net income are interest expenses related to net financial debt, after applicable income taxes (net cost of net debt) and non-controlling interests.

 

(iii)Adjusted income

Operating income, net operating income, or net income excluding the effect of adjustment items described above.

 

F-18TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


(iv)Fully-diluted adjusted earnings per share

Adjusted net income divided by the fully-diluted weighted-average number of common shares.

 

(v)Capital employed

Non-current assets and working capital, at replacement cost, net of deferred income taxes and non-current liabilities.

 

(vi)ROACE (Return on Average Capital Employed)

Ratio of adjusted net operating income to average capital employed between the beginning and the end of the period.

 

(vii)ROE (Return on Equity)

Ratio of adjusted consolidated net income to average adjusted shareholders’ equity (after distribution) between the beginning and the end of the period.

 

(viii)Net debt

Non-current debt, including current portion, current borrowings, other current financial liabilities, less cash and cash equivalents and other current financial assets.

3) CHANGES IN THE GROUP STRUCTURE, MAIN ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTMENTS

During 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, main changes in the Group structure and main acquisitions and divestments were as follows:

2013

Upstream

TOTAL finalized in February 2013 the acquisition of an additional 6% interest in the Ichthys liquefied natural gas (LNG) project from its partner INPEX. TOTAL’s overall equity stake in the Ichthys LNG project increased from 24% to 30%.

TOTAL finalized in February 2013 the sale to INPEX of a 9.99% indirect interest in offshore Angola Block 14.

On March 27, 2013, TOTAL entered into an agreement for the sale to Suncor Energy Inc. of its 49% interest in the Voyageur upgrader project, which is located in the Canadian province of Alberta and intended to upgrade bitumen from the Fort Hills and Joslyn mines. The transaction amounted to $506 million (381 million). The

mining development projects of Fort Hills and Joslyn continue according to the production evacuation logistics studies jointly conducted with Suncor. The sale entails a net loss of1,247 million.

TOTAL finalized in June 2013 the sale of a 25% interest in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy to Mitsui.

TOTAL finalized in July 2013 the sale of 100% of Transport et Infrastructures Gaz France (TIGF) to a consortium comprising Snam, EDF and GIC (Government of Singapore Investment Corporation) for an amount of1,558 million, net of cash sold.

TOTAL finalized in September 2013 the sale of its Upstream interests in Trinidad & Tobago to The National Gas Company of Trinidad & Tobago for an amount of236 million ($318 million), net of cash sold.

TOTAL finalized in December 2013 the acquisition by Qatar Petroleum International of 15% of the capital of Total E&P Congo through a capital increase of1,225 million ($1,627 million).

TOTAL finalized during 2013 the acquisition of an additional 1.62% interest in Novatek for an amount of437 million ($587 million), bringing TOTAL’s overall interest in Novatek to 16.96% as at December 31, 2013.

In October 2013, a consortium in which TOTAL holds a 20% interest was awarded a production sharing contract for 35 years to develop the Libra oil field in Brazil. TOTAL paid a signing bonus of 3,000 million Brazilian Real (approximately $1,301 million).

Refining & Chemicals

TOTAL finalized in June 2013 the sale of its fertilizing businesses in Europe.

Information relating to sales in progress is presented in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” in note 34.

2012

Upstream

TOTAL finalized in February 2012 the acquisition in Uganda of a one-third interest in Blocks 1, 2 and 3A held by Tullow Oil plc for1,157 million ($1,487 million), entirely consisting of mineral interests. TOTAL became an equal partner with

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-19


Tullow and CNOOC in the blocks, each with a one-third interest and each being an operator of one of the blocks. TOTAL is the operator of Block 1.

TOTAL finalized during 2012 the acquisition of an additional 1.25% interest in Novatek for an amount of368 million ($480 million), increasing TOTAL’s overall interest in Novatek to 15.34% as at December 31, 2012.

TOTAL finalized in October 2012 the sale of its interest in the Cusiana field as well as a participation in OAM and ODC pipelines in Colombia to Sinochem, for an amount of318 million ($409 million), net of cash sold.

Holding

During 2012, TOTAL gradually sold its remaining interest in Sanofi, generating a net capital gain of341 million after tax. As at the December 31, 2012 the Group retained no further interest in the capital of Sanofi.

2011

 

Upstream

 

TOTAL finalized in March 2011 the acquisition from Santos of an additional 7.5% interest in Australia’s GLNG project. This increases TOTAL’s overall stake in the project to 27.5%.

TOTAL finalized in March 2011 the acquisition from Santos of an additional 7.5% interest in Australia’s GLNG project. This increased TOTAL’s overall stake in the project to 27.5%.

The acquisition cost amountsamounted to202 million ($281 million) and mainly correspondscorresponded to the value of mineral interests that have been recognized as intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet for227 million.

 

In March 2011, Total E&P Canada Ltd., a TOTAL subsidiary, and Suncor Energy Inc. (Suncor) have finalized a strategic oil sands alliance encompassing the Suncor-operated Fort Hills mining project, the TOTAL-operated Joslyn mining project and the Suncor-operated Voyageur upgrader project. All three assets are located in the Athabasca region of the province of Alberta, in Canada.

In March 2011, Total E&P Canada Ltd., a TOTAL subsidiary, and Suncor Energy Inc. (Suncor) finalized a strategic oil sands alliance encompassing the Suncor-operated Fort Hills mining project, the TOTAL-operated Joslyn mining project and the Suncor-operated Voyageur upgrader project. All three assets are located in the Athabasca region of the province of Alberta, in Canada.

TOTAL acquired 19.2% of Suncor’s interest in the Fort Hills project, increasing TOTAL’s overall interest in the project to 39.2%. Suncor, as operator, holdsheld 40.8%. TOTAL also acquired a 49% stake in the Suncor-operated Voyageur upgrader project. For those two acquisitions, the Group paid1,937 million (CAD 2,666 million)

mainly representing the value of intangible assets for474 million and the value of tangible assets for1,550 million.

Furthermore, TOTAL sold to Suncor 36.75% interest in the Joslyn project for612 million (CAD 842 million). The Group, as operator, retainsretained a 38.25% interest in the project.

 

TOTAL finalized in April 2011 the sale of its 75.8% interest in its upstream Cameroonian affiliate Total E&P Cameroun to Perenco, for an amount of172 million ($247 million), net of cash sold.

TOTAL finalized in April 2011 the sale of its 75.8% interest in its upstream Cameroonian affiliate Total E&P Cameroun to Perenco, for an amount of172 million ($247 million), net of cash sold.

TOTAL and the Russian company Novatek signed in March 2011 two Memorandums of Cooperation to develop the cooperation between TOTAL on one side, and Novatek and its main shareholders on the other side.

TOTAL and the Russian company Novatek signed in March 2011 two Memorandums of Cooperation to develop the cooperation between TOTAL on one side, and Novatek and its main shareholders on the other side.

This cooperation iswas developed around the two following axes:

 

In April 2011, TOTAL took a 12.09% shareholding in Novatek for an amount of2,901 million ($4,108 million). In December 2011, TOTAL finalized the acquisition of an additional 2% interest in Novatek for an amount of596 million ($796 million), increasing TOTAL’s overall interest in Novatek to 14.09%. TOTAL considers that it has a significant influence especially through its representation on the Board of Directors of Novatek and its participation in the major Yamal LNG project. Therefore, the interest in Novatek has been accounted for by the equity method since the second quarter of 2011.

In April 2011, TOTAL took a 12.09% shareholding in Novatek for an amount of2,901 million ($4,108 million). In December 2011, TOTAL finalized the acquisition of an additional 2% interest in Novatek for an amount of596 million ($796 million), which increased TOTAL’s overall interest in Novatek to 14.09%. TOTAL considered that it had a significant influence especially through its representation on the Board of Directors of Novatek and its participation in the major Yamal LNG project. Therefore, the interest in Novatek has been accounted for by the equity method since the second quarter of 2011.

 

In October 2011, TOTAL finalized the acquisition of a 20% interest in the Yamal LNG project and has become Novatek’s partner in this project.

In October 2011, TOTAL finalized the acquisition of a 20% interest in the Yamal LNG project and became Novatek’s partner in this project.

 

TOTAL finalized in July 2011 the sale of 10% of its interest in the Colombian pipeline OCENSA. The Group still held a 5.2% interest in this asset.

After the all-cash tender of $23.25 per share launched on April 28, 2011 and completed on June 21, 2011, TOTAL has acquired a 60% stake in SunPower Corp., a U.S. company listed on Nasdaq with headquarters in San Jose (California), one of the most established players in the American solar industry. Shares of SunPower Corp. continue to be traded on the Nasdaq.

The acquisition cost, whose cash payment occurred on June 21, 2011, amounts to974 million ($1,394 million)

TOTAL finalized in September 2011 the acquisition of Esso Italiana’s interests respectively in the Gorgoglione concession (25% interest), which contains the Tempa Rossa field, and in two exploration licenses located in the same area (51.7% for each one). The acquisition increased TOTAL’s interest in the operated Tempa Rossa field to 75%. In accordance with revised IFRS 3, TOTAL is currently assessing the fair value of identifiable acquired assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. Based on available information, provisional fair value of net assets acquired at 100% amounts to $1,512 million.

Given the estimated fair value of instruments that are likely to confer rights to non-controlling interests, provisional goodwill amounts to $533 million. This goodwill must be allocated within twelve months from the acquisition date.

 

Provisional allocation of the acquisition price and the amount of non-controlling interests at the acquisition date are as follows:

 

(M$)F-20 Fair value at the
acquisition date
TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


 

TOTAL finalized in December 2011 the sale to Silex Gas Norway AS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz, of its entire stake in Gassled (6.4%) and related entities for an amount of477 million (NOK 3.7 billion).

 

Intangible assets

465

Tangible assets

589

Accounts receivable, net

396

Other current assets

223

Other capital employed

292

Net debt

(453

Net assetsTotal E&P USA Inc. signed in December 2011 an agreement to enter into a Joint Venture with Chesapeake Exploration L.L.C., a subsidiary of SunPower (100%) asChesapeake Energy Corporation, and its partner EnerVest Ltd. Under the terms of June 21, 2011

1,512

Share attributable at 100% to non-controlling interests

(76

Net assets of SunPower (100%) as of June 21, 2011 tothis agreement, TOTAL acquired a 25% share

1,436

Group share 60%

861

Goodwill

533

Acquisition cost of SunPower’s shares

1,394

Non-controlling interests (40%)

575

Reinclusion in Chesapeake’s and EnerVest’s liquids-rich area of the Utica shale play. TOTAL paid to Chesapeake and EnerVest500 million ($696 million) in cash for the acquisition of these assets. TOTAL will also be committed to pay additional amounts up to $1.63 billion over a maximum period of 7 years in the form of a 60% carry of Chesapeake and EnerVest’s future capital expenditures on drilling and completion of wells within the Joint Venture. Furthermore, TOTAL will also acquire a 25% share attributable at 100% to non-controlling interests

76

Non-controlling interests asin any new acreage which will be acquired by Chesapeake in the liquids-rich area of June 21, 2011the Utica shale play.

651

 

Since the acquisition date, sales and net income Group share (before impairment of goodwill) realized by SunPower amount respectively to $1,447 million and $(56) million. The goodwill arising from the acquisition of SunPower has been impaired in 2011 (see Note 4E to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Acquisition-related costs recognized in the statement of income for the period amount to9 million.

As part of the transaction, various agreements were signed, including a financial guarantee agreement through which TOTAL guarantees up to $1 billion SunPower’s repayments obligations under letters of credit that would be issued during the next five years for the development of solar power plants and large roofs activities. Furthermore, SunPower’s off-balance sheet commitments and contractual obligations are now included in TOTAL’s notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

TOTAL finalized in July 2011 the sale of 10% of its interest in the Colombian pipeline OCENSA. The Group still holds a 5.2% interest in this asset.

TOTAL finalized in September 2011 the acquisition of Esso Italiana’s interests respectively in the Gorgoglione concession (25% interest), which contains the Tempa Rossa field, and in two exploration licenses located in the same area (51.7% for each one). The acquisition increases TOTAL’s interest in the operated Tempa Rossa field to 75%.

TOTAL finalized in December 2011 the sale to Silex Gas Norway AS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz, of its entire stake in Gassled (6.4%) and related entities for an amount of477 million (NOK 3.7 billion).Refining & Chemicals

 

Total E&P USA Inc. signed in December 2011 an agreement to enter into a Joint Venture with Chesapeake Exploration L.L.C., a subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and its partner EnerVest Ltd. Under the terms of this agreement, TOTAL acquired a 25% share in Chesapeake’s and EnerVest’s liquids-rich area of the Utica shale play. TOTAL paid to Chesapeake and EnerVest500 million ($696 million) in cash for the acquisition of these assets. TOTAL will also be committed to pay additional amounts up to $1.63 billion over a maximum period of 7 years in the form of a 60% carry of Chesapeake and EnerVest’s future capital expenditures on drilling and completion of wells within the Joint Venture. Furthermore, TOTAL will also acquire a 25% share in any new acreage which will be acquired by Chesapeake in the liquids-rich area of the Utica shale play.

Downstream

TOTAL and International Petroleum Investment Company (a company wholly-owned by the Government of Abu Dhabi) entered into an agreement on February 15, 2011 for the sale, to International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC), of the 48.83% equity interest held by TOTAL in the share capital of CEPSA, to be completed within the framework of a public tender

  

TOTAL finalized in July 2011 the sale of its photocure and coatings resins businesses to Arkema for an amount of520 million, net of cash sold.

TOTAL and International Petroleum Investment Company (a company wholly-owned by the Government of Abu Dhabi) entered into an agreement on February 15, 2011 for the sale, to International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC), of the 48.83% equity interest held by TOTAL in the share capital of CEPSA, to be completed within the framework of a public tender offer being launched by IPIC for all the CEPSA shares not yet held by IPIC, at a unit purchase price of28 per CEPSA share. TOTAL sold to IPIC all of its equity interest in CEPSA and received, as of July 29, 2011, an amount of3,659 million.

 

TOTAL finalized in October 2011 the sale of most of its Marketing assets in the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, to Rontec Investments LLP, a consortium led by Snax 24, one of the leading independent forecourt operators in the United Kingdom, for an amount of424 million (£368 million).

Chemicals

TOTAL finalized in July 2011 the sale of its photocure and coatings resins businesses to Arkema for an amount of520 million, net of cash sold.

2010

Upstream

Total E&P Canada Ltd., a TOTAL subsidiary, signed in July 2010 an agreement with UTS Energy Corporation (UTS) to acquire UTS Corporation with its main asset, a 20% interest in the Fort Hills mining project in the Athabasca region of the Canadian province of Alberta.

Total E&P Canada completed on September 30, 2010 the acquisition of all UTS shares for a cash amount of 3.08 Canadian dollars per share. Taking into account the cash held by UTS and acquired by TOTAL (232 million), the cost of the acquisition for TOTAL amounted to862 million. This amount mainly represented the value of mineral interests that have been recognized as intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet for646 million and the value of tangible assets that have been recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for217 million.

TOTAL completed in September 2010 an agreement for the sale to BP and Hess of its interests in the Valhall (15.72%) and Hod (25%) fields, in the Norwegian North Sea, for an amount of800 million.

TOTAL signed in September 2010 an agreement with Santos and Petronas to acquire a 20% interest in the GLNG project in Australia. Upon completion of this transaction finalised in October 2010, the project brought together Santos (45%, operator), Petronas (35%) and TOTAL (20%).

The acquisition cost amounted to566 million and it mainly represented the value of mineral interests that have been recognized as intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet for617 million.

In addition, TOTAL announced in December 2010 the signature of an agreement to acquire an additional 7.5% interest in this project.

TOTAL sold in December 2010 its 5% interest in Block 31, located in the Angolan ultra deep offshore, to the company China Sonangol International Holding Limited.

Downstream& Services

 

  

TOTAL and ERG announcedfinalized in January 2010 that they signed an agreement to create a joint venture, named TotalErg, by contributionOctober 2011 the sale of the major partmost of their activitiesits Marketing assets in the refiningUnited Kingdom, the Channel Islands and marketing business in Italy. TotalErg has been operational since October 1st, 2010. The shareholder pact calls for joint governance as well as operating independence for the new entity. TOTAL’s interest in TotalErg is 49% and is accounted for by the equity method (see Note 12Isle of Man, to the Consolidated Financial Statements).Rontec

Chemicals

TOTAL closed on April 1, 2010 the sale of its consumer specialty chemicals business, Mapa Spontex, to U.S.-based Jarden Corporation for an enterprise value of335 million.

Corporate

On March 24, 2010, TOTAL S.A. filed a public tender offer followed by a squeeze out with the French Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) in order to buy the 1,468,725 Elf Aquitaine shares that it did not already hold, representing 0.52% of Elf Aquitaine’s share capital and 0.27% of its voting rights, at a price of305 per share (including the remaining 2009 dividend). On April 13, 2010, the French Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issued its clearance decision for this offer.

The public tender offer was open from April 16 to April 29, 2010 inclusive. The Elf Aquitaine shares targeted by the offer which were not tendered to the offer have been transferred to TOTAL S.A. under the squeeze out upon payment to the shareholders equal to the offer price on the first trading day after the offer closing date, i.e. on April 30, 2010.

On April 30, 2010, TOTAL S.A. announced that, following the squeeze out, it held 100% of Elf Aquitaine shares, with the transaction amounting to450 million.

In application of revised standard IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”, effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2010, transactions with non-controlling interests are accounted for as equity transactions, i.e. in consolidated shareholder’s equity.

As a consequence, following the squeeze out of the Elf Aquitaine shares by TOTAL S.A., the difference between the consideration paid and the book value of non-controlling interests acquired was recognized directly as a decrease in equity.

During 2010, TOTAL progressively sold 1.88% of Sanofi’s share capital, thus reducing its interest to 5.51%.

As from July 1, 2010, given its reduced representation on the Board of Directors and the decrease in the percentage of voting rights, TOTAL ceased to have a significant influence over Sanofi-Aventis and no longer consolidated this investment under the equity method. The investment in Sanofi is accounted for as a financial asset available for sale in the line “Other investments” of the consolidated balance sheet at its fair value, i.e. at the stock price.

Net income as of December 31, 2010 included a135 million gain relating to this change in the accounting treatment.

2009

Upstream

In December 2009, TOTAL signed an agreement with Chesapeake Energy Corporation whereby TOTAL acquired a 25% share in Chesapeake’s Barnett shale gas portfolio located in the United States (State of Texas). The acquisition cost of these assets amounted to1,562 million and it represented the value of mineral interests that have been recognized as intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet for1,449 million and the value of tangible assets that have been recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for113 million. As no cash payment has occurred in 2009, a corresponding debt has been recognized

  

Investments LLP, a consortium led by Snax 24, one of the leading independent forecourt operators in the sections “Provisions and other non-current liabilities” and “Other creditors and accrued liabilities”United Kingdom, for an amount of818424 million and744 million respectively.(£368 million).

 

After the all-cash tender of $23.25 per share launched on April 28, 2011 and completed on June 21, 2011, TOTAL acquired a 60% stake in SunPower Corp., a U.S. company listed on NASDAQ with headquarters in San Jose (California). Shares of SunPower Corp. continue to be traded on the NASDAQ.

CorporateThe acquisition cost, whose cash payment occurred on June 21, 2011, amounted to974 million ($1,394 million).

During 2009, TOTAL progressively sold 3.99% of Sanofi-Aventis’ share capital, thus reducing its interestThe goodwill amounted to 7.39%. Sanofi-Aventis is accounted for by the equity method in TOTAL’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended $533 million and was fully depreciated onDecember 31, 2009.2011.

4)BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

Financial information by business segment is reported in accordance with the internal reporting system and shows internal segment information that is used to manage and measure the performance of TOTAL. The Group’s activities are conducted through three business segments:

TOTAL and which is reviewed by the Upstream segment includes the activitiesmain operational decision-making body of the Exploration & Production division andGroup, namely the Gas & Power division;

the Downstream segment includes activities of the Refining & Marketing division and the Trading & Shipping division; and

the Chemicals segment includes Base Chemicals and Specialties.

The Corporate segment includes the operating and financial activities of the holding companies (including the investment in Sanofi).Executive committee.

The operational profit and assets are broken down by business segment prior to the consolidation and inter-segment adjustments.

Sales prices between business segments approximate market prices.

Furthermore, the Group announced in October 2011 a plan of reorganization of itsThe Group’s activities are divided into three business segments Downstream and Chemicals. The consultation and notification process towards employee representatives is finished and this reorganization became effective as follows:

an Upstream segment including, alongside the activities of January 1st, 2012.

This plan changed the organization throughExploration & Production of hydrocarbons, the creation of:activities of Gas & Power;

 

a Refining & Chemicals segment that isconstituting a major productionindustrial hub combining TOTAL’scomprising the activitites of refining, petrochemicals, fertilizers and specialty chemicals operations.speciality chemicals. This segment also includes the activitites of oil Trading & Shipping activities ;Shipping; and

 

a SupplyMarketing & MarketingServices segment that is dedicated toincluding the global activitites of supply and marketing in the field of petroleum products.products as well as the activity of New Energies.

In addition the Corporate segment includes holdings operating and financial activities.

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-21


A) INFORMATION BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

 

For the year ended December 31, 2011
(M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   23,298    141,907    19,477    11        184,693  

Intersegment sales

   27,301    5,983    1,234    185    (34,703    

Excise taxes

       (18,143              (18,143

Revenues from sales

   50,599    129,747    20,711    196    (34,703  166,550  

Operating expenses

   (23,079  (126,145  (19,566  (667  34,703    (134,754

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (5,076  (1,908  (487  (35      (7,506

Operating income

   22,444    1,694    658    (506      24,290  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   1,596    401    471    336        2,804  

Tax on net operating income

   (13,506  (409  (225  (38      (14,178

Net operating income

   10,534    1,686    904    (208      12,916  

Net cost of net debt

        (335

Non-controlling interests

                       (305

Net income

                       12,276  

For the year ended December 31, 2011
(adjustments
(a)) (M)
  Upstream Downstream Chemicals Corporate Intercompany   Total 
For the year ended December 31, 2013
(M€)
  Upstream Refining &
Chemicals
 Marketing &
Services
 Corporate Intercompany Total 

Non-Group sales

   45         45     19,855    86,204    83,481    2        189,542  

Intersegment sales

              28,349    39,360    1,626    133    (69,468    

Excise taxes

               (3,625  (14,262          (17,887

Revenues from sales

   45         45     48,204    121,939    70,845    135    (69,468  171,655  

Operating expenses

       1,156    (33        1,123     (24,002  (120,500  (68,802  (597  69,468    (144,433

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (75  (700  (6        (781   (7,141  (1,307  (552  (31      (9,031

Operating income(b)

   (30  456    (39           387     17,061    132    1,491    (493      18,191  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   191    256    209    90      746  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   2,027    143    39    (23      2,186  

Tax on net operating income

   (32  (109  (41  (80    (262   (10,321  (460  (413  (21      (11,215

Net operating income(b)

   129    603    129    10      871     8,767    (185  1,117    (537      9,162  

Net cost of net debt

                                  (501

Non-controlling interests

      (19                       (221

Net income

      852                         8,440  
       
For the year ended December 31, 2013
(adjustments)(a) (M€)
  Upstream Refining &
Chemicals
 Marketing &
Services
 Corporate Intercompany Total 

Non-Group sales

   (56                  (56

Intersegment sales

                         

Excise taxes

                         

Revenues from sales

   (56                  (56

Operating expenses

   (86  (1,059  (102          (1,247

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (651  (138  (3          (792

Operating income(b)

   (793  (1,197  (105          (2,095

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   (218  (199  2    (30      (445

Tax on net operating income

   408    (193  69    (34      250  

Net operating income(b)

   (603  (1,589  (34  (64      (2,290

Net cost of net debt

                         

Non-controlling interests

                       (15

Net income

                       (2,305

 

(a)Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and as from January 1st, 2011, the effect of changes in fair value.

(b)    Of which inventory valuation effect

  Upstream   Downstream ChemicalsCorporate    

           onOn operating income

        1,224(737)   (965        

           onOn net operating income

        859(495)   10(47)         

For the year ended December 31, 2011
(adjusted) (M)
(a)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   23,253    141,907    19,477    11        184,648  

Intersegment sales

   27,301    5,983    1,234    185    (34,703    

Excise taxes

       (18,143              (18,143

Revenues from sales

   50,554    129,747    20,711    196    (34,703  166,505  

Operating expenses

   (23,079  (127,301  (19,533  (667  34,703    (135,877

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (5,001  (1,208  (481  (35      (6,725

Adjusted operating income

   22,474    1,238    697    (506      23,903  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   1,405    145    262    246        2,058  

Tax on net operating income

   (13,474  (300  (184  42        (13,916

Adjusted net operating income

   10,405    1,083    775    (218      12,045  

Net cost of net debt

        (335

Non-controlling interests

                       (286

Adjusted net income

                       11,424  

Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share ()

                       5.06  

 

(a)Except for earnings per share
F-22TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


For the year ended December 31, 2013
(adjusted) (M€)(a)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   19,911    86,204    83,481    2        189,598  

Intersegment sales

   28,349    39,360    1,626    133    (69,468    

Excise taxes

       (3,625  (14,262          (17,887

Revenues from sales

   48,260    121,939    70,845    135    (69,468  171,711  

Operating expenses

   (23,916  (119,441  (68,700  (597  69,468    (143,186

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (6,490  (1,169  (549  (31      (8,239

Adjusted operating income

   17,854    1,329    1,596    (493      20,286  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   2,245    342    37    7        2,631  

Tax on net operating income

   (10,729  (267  (482  13        (11,465

Adjusted net operating income

   9,370    1,404    1,151    (473      11,452  

Net cost of net debt

                       (501

Non-controlling interests

                       (206

Adjusted net income

                       10,745  

Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share (€)

                       4.73  

 

(a)    Except for earnings per share.

       
       
For the year ended December 31, 2013
(M€)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Total expenditures

   22,396    2,039    1,365    122        25,922  

Total divestments

   4,353    275    141    45        4,814  

Cash flow from operating activities

   16,457    3,211    1,926    (121      21,473  

Balance sheets as of December 31, 2013

       

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   75,169    8,998    4,671    262        89,100  

Investments & loans in equity affiliates

   11,499    2,568    737            14,804  

Other non-current assets

   4,125    1,045    1,475    567        7,212  

Working capital

   (237  7,545    2,692    (1,974      8,026  

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

   (22,894  (3,216  (1,669  (936      (28,715

Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale

   1,603                    1,603  

Capital Employed (balance sheet)

   69,265    16,940    7,906    (2,081      92,030  

Less inventory valuation effect

       (2,643  (647  (2      (3,292

Capital Employed

   69,265    14,297    7,259    (2,083      88,738  

(Business segment information)

       

ROACE as a percentage

   14  9  16          13

For the year ended December 31, 2011
(M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Total expenditures

   21,689    1,870    847    135      24,541  

Total divestments

   2,656    3,235    1,164    1,523      8,578  

Cash flow from operating activities

   17,054    2,165    512    (195    19,536  

Balance sheet as of December 31, 2011

        

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   64,069    7,918    4,638    245      76,870  

Investments in equity affiliates

   8,932    699    1,118          10,749  

Loans to equity affiliates and other non-current assets

   4,793    1,749    1,144    3,105      10,791  

Working capital

   1,240    9,627    2,585    (1,374    12,078  

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

   (20,095  (2,577  (1,593  (1,136    (25,401

Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale

                       

Capital Employed (balance sheet)

   58,939    17,416    7,892    840      85,087  

Less inventory valuation effect

       (3,615  (419  13      (4,021

Capital Employed (Business segment information)

   58,939    13,801    7,473    853      81,066  

ROACE as a percentage

   20%    7%    10%           16%  

For the year ended December 31, 2010
(M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   18,527    123,245    17,490    7        159,269  

Intersegment sales

   22,540    4,693    981    186    (28,400    

Excise taxes

       (18,793              (18,793

Revenues from sales

   41,067    109,145    18,471    193    (28,400  140,476  

Operating expenses

   (18,271  (105,660  (16,974  (665  28,400    (113,170

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (5,346  (2,503  (533  (39      (8,421

Operating income

   17,450    982    964��   (511      18,885  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   1,533    141    215    595        2,484  

Tax on net operating income

   (10,131  (201  (267  263        (10,336

Net operating income

   8,852    922    912    347        11,033  

Net cost of net debt

        (226

Non-controlling interests

                       (236

Net income

                       10,571  

For the year ended December 31, 2010
(adjustments
(a)) (M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

        

Intersegment sales

        

Excise taxes

                        

Revenues from sales

        

Operating expenses

       923    92          1,015  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (203  (1,192  (21         (1,416

Operating income(b)

   (203  (269  71          (401

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items(c)

   183    (126  (16  227      268  

Tax on net operating income

   275    149        (6     418  

Net operating income(b)

   255    (246  55    221      285  

Net cost of net debt

           

Non-controlling interests

                      (2

Net income

                      283  

 

(a)    Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and, until June 30, 2010, equity share of adjustments related to Sanofi.

(b)    Of which inventory valuation effect

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.
 UpstreamDownstreamChemicalsCorporate

       on operating income

863130

       on net operating income

640113

(c)    Of which equity share of adjustments related to Sanofi

(81

For the year ended December 31, 2010
(adjusted) (M)
(a)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   18,527    123,245    17,490    7        159,269  

Intersegment sales

   22,540    4,693    981    186    (28,400    

Excise taxes

       (18,793              (18,793

Revenues from sales

   41,067    109,145    18,471    193    (28,400  140,476  

Operating expenses

   (18,271  (106,583  (17,066  (665  28,400    (114,185

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (5,143  (1,311  (512  (39      (7,005

Adjusted operating income

   17,653    1,251    893    (511      19,286  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   1,350    267    231    368        2,216  

Tax on net operating income

   (10,406  (350  (267  269        (10,754

Adjusted net operating income

   8,597    1,168    857    126        10,748  

Net cost of net debt

        (226

Non-controlling interests

                       (234

Adjusted net income

                       10,288  

Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share ()

  

                  4.58  

(a)Except for earnings per shareF-23

For the year ended December 31, 2010
(M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Total expenditures

   13,208    2,343    641    81      16,273  

Total divestments

   2,067    499    347    1,403      4,316  

Cash flow from operating activities

   15,573    1,441    934    545      18,493  

Balance sheet as of December 31, 2010

        

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   50,565    8,675    4,388    253      63,881  

Investments in equity affiliates

   5,002    2,782    1,349          9,133  

Loans to equity affiliates and other non-current assets

   4,184    1,366    979    4,099      10,628  

Working capital

   (363  9,154    2,223    (211    10,803  

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

   (16,076  (2,328  (1,631  (1,181    (21,216

Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale

   660        413          1,073  

Capital Employed (balance sheet)

   43,972    19,649    7,721    2,960      74,302  

Less inventory valuation effect

       (4,088  (409  1,061      (3,436

Capital Employed (Business segment information)

   43,972    15,561    7,312    4,021      70,866  

ROACE as a percentage

   21%    8%    12%           16%  

For the year ended December 31, 2009
(M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   16,072    100,518    14,726    11        131,327  

Intersegment sales

   15,958    3,786    735    156    (20,635    

Excise taxes

       (19,174              (19,174

Revenues from sales

   32,030    85,130    15,461    167    (20,635  112,153  

Operating expenses

   (14,752  (81,281  (14,293  (656  20,635    (90,347

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (4,420  (1,612  (615  (35      (6,682

Operating income

   12,858    2,237    553    (524      15,124  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   846    169    (58  697        1,654  

Tax on net operating income

   (7,486  (633  (92  326        (7,885

Net operating income

   6,218    1,773    403    499        8,893  

Net cost of net debt

        (264

Non-controlling interests

                       (182

Net income

                       8,447  

For the year ended December 31, 2009
(adjustments
(a)) (M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

        

Intersegment sales

        

Excise taxes

                        

Revenues from sales

        

Operating expenses

   (17  1,558    344          1,885  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (4  (347  (40         (391

Operating income(b)

   (21  1,211    304          1,494  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items(c)

   (160  22    (123  (117    (378

Tax on net operating income

   17    (413  (50  (3     (449

Net operating income(b)

   (164  820    131    (120    667  

Net cost of net debt

           

Non-controlling interests

                      (4

Net income

                      663  

For the year ended December 31, 2012
(M€)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing
& Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   22,143    91,117    86,614    187        200,061  

Intersegment sales

   31,521    44,470    755    199    (76,945    

Excise taxes

       (3,593  (14,169          (17,762

Revenues from sales

   53,664    131,994    73,200    386    (76,945  182,299  

Operating expenses

   (25,966  (129,499  (71,535  (973  76,945    (151,028

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (7,437  (1,445  (607  (36      (9,525

Operating income

   20,261    1,050    1,058    (623      21,746  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   2,325    213    (198  276        2,616  

Tax on net operating income

   (12,359  (263  (380  (127      (13,129

Net operating income

   10,227    1,000    480    (474      11,233  

Net cost of net debt

                       (477

Non-controlling interests

                       (147

Net income

                       10,609  
       
For the year ended December 31, 2012
(adjustments)(a) (M€)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing
& Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   (9                  (9

Intersegment sales

                         

Excise taxes

                         

Revenues from sales

   (9                  (9

Operating expenses

   (586  (199  (229  (88      (1,102

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (1,200  (206  (68          (1,474

Operating income(b)

   (1,795  (405  (297  (88      (2,585

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   240    (41  (119  146        226  

Tax on net operating income

   637    70    66    (108      665  

Net operating income(b)

   (918  (376  (350  (50      (1,694

Net cost of net debt

                         

Non-controlling interests

                       27  

Net income

                       (1,667

 

(a)Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and equity sharethe effect of adjustments related to Sanofi.changes in fair value.

(b)    Of which inventory valuation effect

  Upstream   Downstream ChemicalsCorporate    

       onOn operating income

        1,816(179)   389(55)         

       onOn net operating income

        1,285(116)   254(39)         

(c)    Of which equity share of adjustments related to Sanofi

(300

For the year ended December 31, 2009
(adjusted) (M)
(a)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   16,072    100,518    14,726    11        131,327  

Intersegment sales

   15,958    3,786    735    156    (20,635    

Excise taxes

       (19,174              (19,174

Revenues from sales

   32,030    85,130    15,461    167    (20,635  112,153  

Operating expenses

   (14,735  (82,839  (14,637  (656  20,635    (92,232

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (4,416  (1,265  (575  (35      (6,291

Adjusted operating income

   12,879    1,026    249    (524      13,630  

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   1,006    147    65    814        2,032  

Tax on net operating income

   (7,503  (220  (42  329        (7,436

Adjusted net operating income

   6,382    953    272    619        8,226  

Net cost of net debt

        (264

Non-controlling interests

                       (178

Adjusted net income

                       7,784  

Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share ()

  

                  3.48  

 

(a)Except for earnings per share
F-24TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013

For the year ended December 31, 2009
(M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Total expenditures

   9,855    2,771    631    92      13,349  

Total divestments

   398    133    47    2,503      3,081  

Cash flow from operating activities

   10,200    1,164    1,082    (86    12,360  

Balance sheet as of December 31, 2009

        

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   43,997    9,588    5,248    271      59,104  

Investments in equity affiliates

   4,260    2,110    652    4,235      11,257  

Loans to equity affiliates and other non-current assets

   3,844    1,369    850    547      6,610  

Working capital

   660    7,624    2,151    58      10,493  

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

   (15,364  (2,190  (1,721  (1,094    (20,369

Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale

                       

Capital Employed (balance sheet)

   37,397    18,501    7,180    4,017      67,095  

Less inventory valuation effect

       (3,202  (282  840      (2,644

Capital Employed (Business segment information)

   37,397    15,299    6,898    4,857      64,451  

ROACE as a percentage

   18%    7%    4%           13%  

For the year ended December 31, 2012
(adjusted) (M€)(a)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing
& Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   22,152    91,117    86,614    187        200,070  

Intersegment sales

   31,521    44,470    755    199    (76,945    

Excise taxes

       (3,593  (14,169          (17,762

Revenues from sales

   53,673    131,994    73,200    386    (76,945  182,308  

Operating expenses

   (25,380  (129,300  (71,306  (885  76,945    (149,926

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (6,237  (1,239  (539  (36      (8,051

Adjusted operating income

   22,056    1,455    1,355    (535      24,331  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   2,085    254    (79  130        2,390  

Tax on net operating income

   (12,996  (333  (446  (19      (13,794

Adjusted net operating income

   11,145    1,376    830    (424      12,927  

Net cost of net debt

                       (477

Non-controlling interests

                       (174

Adjusted net income

                       12,276  

Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share (€)

                       5.42  

 

(a)    Except for earnings per share.

       
       
For the year ended December 31, 2012
(M€)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing
& Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Total expenditures

   19,618    1,944    1,301    80        22,943  

Total divestments

   2,798    304    152    2,617        5,871  

Cash flow from operating activities

   18,950    2,127    1,132    253        22,462  

Balance sheets as of December 31, 2012

       

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   68,310    9,220    4,433    227        82,190  

Investments & loans in equity affiliates

   11,080    1,971    708            13,759  

Other non-current assets

   3,226    1,194    1,293    419        6,132  

Working capital

   (329  9,623    2,821    (1,772      10,343  

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

   (21,492  (3,046  (1,627  (1,296      (27,461

Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale

   3,067                    3,067  

Capital Employed (balance sheet)

   63,862    18,962    7,628    (2,422      88,030  

Less inventory valuation effect

       (3,236  (642          (3,878

Capital Employed (Business segment information)

   63,862    15,726    6,986    (2,422      84,152  

ROACE as a percentage

   18%    9%    12%            16%  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-25


For the year ended December 31, 2011
(M€)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing
& Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   22,211    77,146    85,325    11        184,693  

Intersegment sales

   27,301    44,277    805    185    (72,568    

Excise taxes

       (2,362  (15,781          (18,143

Revenues from sales

   49,512    119,061    70,349    196    (72,568  166,550  

Operating expenses

   (21,855  (116,369  (68,384  (663  72,568    (134,703

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (5,039  (1,936  (496  (35      (7,506

Operating income

   22,618    756    1,469    (502      24,341  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   2,198    647    (377  336        2,804  

Tax on net operating income

   (13,576  (138  (441  (41      (14,196

Net operating income

   11,240    1,265    651    (207      12,949  

Net cost of net debt

                       (335

Non-controlling interests

                       (305

Net income

                       12,309  
       
For the year ended December 31, 2011
(adjustments)(a) (M€)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing
& Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   45                    45  

Intersegment sales

                         

Excise taxes

                         

Revenues from sales

   45                    45  

Operating expenses

       852    271            1,123  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (75  (705  (1          (781

Operating income(b)

   (30  147    270            387  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   682    337    (363  90        746  

Tax on net operating income

   (43  (61  (78  (80      (262

Net operating income(b)

   609    423    (171  10        871  

Net cost of net debt

                         

Non-controlling interests

                       (19

Net income

                       852  

 

(a)    Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and the effect of changes in fair value.

       

(b)    Of which inventory valuation effect

       

   On operating income

       928    287        

   On net operating income

       669    200        

F-26TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


For the year ended December 31, 2011
(adjusted) (M€)(a)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Non-Group sales

   22,166    77,146    85,325    11        184,648  

Intersegment sales

   27,301    44,277    805    185    (72,568    

Excise taxes

       (2,362  (15,781          (18,143

Revenues from sales

   49,467    119,061    70,349    196    (72,568  166,505  

Operating expenses

   (21,855  (117,221  (68,655  (663  72,568    (135,826

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (4,964  (1,231  (495  (35      (6,725

Adjusted operating income

   22,648    609    1,199    (502      23,954  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items

   1,516    310    (14  246        2,058  

Tax on net operating income

   (13,533  (77  (363  39        (13,934

Adjusted net operating income

   10,631    842    822    (217      12,078  

Net cost of net debt

                       (335

Non-controlling interests

                       (286

Adjusted net income

                       11,457  

Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share (€)

                       5.08  

 

(a)    Except for earnings per share.

       
       
For the year ended December 31, 2011
(M€)
  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate  Intercompany  Total 

Total expenditures

   20,662    1,910    1,834    135        24,541  

Total divestments

   2,591    2,509    1,955    1,523        8,578  

Cash flow from operating activities

   17,044    2,146    541    (195      19,536  

Balance sheets as of December 31, 2011

       

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   63,250    9,037    4,338    245        76,870  

Investments & loans in equity affiliates

   10,581    1,658    756            12,995  

Other non-current assets

   2,446    1,492    1,188    3,075        8,201  

Working capital

   699    9,851    2,902    (1,374      12,078  

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

   (20,064  (3,220  (1,664  (1,201      (26,149

Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale

                         

Capital Employed (balance sheet)

   56,912    18,818    7,520    745        83,995  

Less inventory valuation effect

       (3,367  (667  13        (4,021

Capital Employed (Business segment information)

   56,912    15,451    6,853    758        79,974  

ROACE as a percentage

   21%    5%    13%            16%  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-27


B) ROE (RETURN ON EQUITY)

The Group evaluates the return on equity as the ratio of adjusted consolidated net income to average adjusted shareholders’ equity between the beginning and the end of

the period. Thus, adjusted shareholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 20112013 is calculated after payment of a dividend of2.282.38 per share, subject to approval by the shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2012.16, 2014.

 

 

The ROE is calculated as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 

Adjusted net income — Group share

   11,424    10,288    7,784  
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Adjusted net income—Group share

   10,745    12,276    11,457  

Adjusted non-controlling interests

   286    234    178     206    174    286  

Adjusted consolidated net income

   11,710    10,522    7,962     10,951    12,450    11,743  

Shareholders’ equity — Group share

   68,037    60,414    52,552  

Shareholders’ equity—Group share

   72,629    71,185    66,945  

Distribution of the income based on existing shares at the closing date

   (1,255  (2,553  (2,546   (1,362  (1,299  (1,255

Non-controlling interests

   1,352    857    987     2,281    1,280    1,352  

Adjusted shareholders’ equity(a)

   68,134    58,718    50,993     73,548    71,166    67,042  

ROE

   18%    19%    16%     15%    18%    19%  

 

(a)Adjusted shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 20082010 amounted to47,410 €57,951 million.

 

C) RECONCILIATION OF THE INFORMATION BY BUSINESS SEGMENT WITH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The table below presents the impact of adjustment items on the Consolidated Statementconsolidated statement of Income:income:

 

For the year ended December 31, 2011 (M)  Adjusted Adjustments(a) Consolidated
statement of
income
 
For the year ended December 31, 2013 (M€)  Adjusted Adjustments(a) Consolidated
statement of
income
 

Sales

   184,648    45    184,693     189,598    (56  189,542  

Excise taxes

   (18,143      (18,143   (17,887      (17,887

Revenues from sales

   166,505    45    166,550     171,711    (56  171,655  

Purchases, net of inventory variation

   (115,107  1,215    (113,892

Purchases net of inventory variation

   (120,311  (802  (121,113

Other operating expenses

   (19,751  (92  (19,843   (21,242  (445  (21,687

Exploration costs

   (1,019      (1,019   (1,633      (1,633

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (6,725  (781  (7,506   (8,239  (792  (9,031

Other income

   430    1,516    1,946     468    1,257    1,725  

Other expense

   (536  (711  (1,247   (418  (1,687  (2,105

Financial interest on debt

   (713      (713   (670      (670

Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents

   273        273     64        64  

Cost of net debt

   (440      (440   (606      (606

Other financial income

   609        609     524        524  

Other financial expense

   (429      (429   (529      (529

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates

   1,984    (59  1,925  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

   2,586    (15  2,571  

Income taxes

   (13,811  (262  (14,073   (11,360  250    (11,110

Consolidated net income

   11,710    871    12,581     10,951    (2,290  8,661  

Group share

   11,424    852    12,276     10,745    (2,305  8,440  

Non-controlling interests

   286    19    305     206    15    221  

 

(a)Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and as from January 1st, 2011, the effect of changes in fair value.

For the year ended December 31, 2010 (M)  Adjusted  Adjustments(a)  Consolidated
statement of
income
 

Sales

   159,269        159,269  

Excise taxes

   (18,793      (18,793

Revenues from sales

   140,476        140,476  

Purchases, net of inventory variation

   (94,286  1,115    (93,171

Other operating expenses

   (19,035  (100  (19,135

Exploration costs

   (864      (864

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (7,005  (1,416  (8,421

Other income

   524    872    1,396  

Other expense

   (346  (554  (900

Financial interest on debt

   (465      (465

Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents

   131        131  

Cost of net debt

   (334      (334

Other financial income

   442        442  

Other financial expense

   (407      (407

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates

   2,003    (50  1,953  

Income taxes

   (10,646  418    (10,228

Consolidated net income

   10,522    285    10,807  

Group share

   10,288    283    10,571  

Non-controlling interests

   234    2    236  

F-28TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


For the year ended December 31, 2012 (M€)  Adjusted  Adjustments(a)  Consolidated
statement of
income
 

Sales

   200,070    (9  200,061  

Excise taxes

   (17,762      (17,762

Revenues from sales

   182,308    (9  182,299  

Purchases net of inventory variation

   (126,564  (234  (126,798

Other operating expenses

   (21,916  (868  (22,784

Exploration costs

   (1,446      (1,446

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (8,051  (1,474  (9,525

Other income

   681    781    1,462  

Other expense

   (448  (467  (915

Financial interest on debt

   (671      (671

Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents

   100        100  

Cost of net debt

   (571      (571

Other financial income

   558        558  

Other financial expense

   (499      (499

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

   2,098    (88  2,010  

Income taxes

   (13,700  665    (13,035

Consolidated net income

   12,450    (1,694  10,756  

Group share

   12,276    (1,667  10,609  

Non-controlling interests

   174    (27  147  

 

(a)Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and until June 30, 2010, equity sharethe effect of adjustments related to Sanofi.changes in fair value.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2009 (M)  Adjusted Adjustments(a) Consolidated
statement of
income
 
For the year ended December 31, 2011 (M€)  Adjusted Adjustments(a) Consolidated
statement of
income
 

Sales

   131,327        131,327     184,648    45    184,693  

Excise taxes

   (19,174      (19,174   (18,143      (18,143

Revenues from sales

   112,153        112,153     166,505    45    166,550  

Purchases, net of inventory variation

   (73,263  2,205    (71,058

Purchases net of inventory variation

   (115,107  1,215    (113,892

Other operating expenses

   (18,271  (320  (18,591   (19,700  (92  (19,792

Exploration costs

   (698      (698   (1,019      (1,019

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests

   (6,291  (391  (6,682   (6,725  (781  (7,506

Other income

   131    183    314     430    1,516    1,946  

Other expense

   (315  (285  (600   (536  (711  (1,247

Financial interest on debt

   (530      (530   (713      (713

Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents

   132        132     273        273  

Cost of net debt

   (398      (398   (440      (440

Other financial income

   643        643     609        609  

Other financial expense

   (345      (345   (429      (429

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates

   1,918    (276  1,642  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

   1,984    (59  1,925  

Income taxes

   (7,302  (449  (7,751   (13,829  (262  (14,091

Consolidated net income

   7,962    667    8,629     11,743    871    12,614  

Group share

   7,784    663    8,447     11,457    852    12,309  

Non-controlling interests

   178    4    182     286    19    305  

 

(a)Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and equity sharethe effect of adjustments related to Sanofi.changes in fair value.

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-29


D) ADJUSTMENT ITEMS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

The adjustment items for income as per Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements are detailed as follows:

 

Adjustments to operating income
For the year ended December 31, 2011 (M)
  Upstream Downstream Chemicals Corporate   Total 

Adjustments to operating income

For the year ended December 31, 2013 (M€)

  Upstream Refining &
Chemicals
 Marketing &
Services
 Corporate   Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       1,224    (9       1,215         (737  (65       (802

Effect of changes in fair value

   45                 45     (56               (56

Restructuring charges

                             (281  (3       (284

Asset impairment charges

   (75  (700  (6       (781   (651  (138  (3       (792

Other items

       (68  (24       (92   (86  (41  (34       (161

Total

   (30  456    (39       387     (793  (1,197  (105       (2,095

 

Adjustments to net income, Group share
For the year ended December 31, 2011 (M)
  Upstream Downstream Chemicals Corporate Total 

Adjustments to net income, Group share

For the year ended December 31, 2013 (M€)

  Upstream Refining &
Chemicals
 Marketing &
Services
 Corporate Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       824    10        834         (495  (54      (549

Effect of changes in fair value

   32                32     (44              (44

Restructuring charges

       (113  (9      (122       (405  (23      (428

Asset impairment charges

   (531  (478  (5      (1,014   (442  (137  (7      (586

Gains (losses) on disposals of assets

   843    412    209    74    1,538     (31  (41          (72

Other items

   (202  (74  (76  (64  (416   (86  (511  35    (64  (626

Total

   142    571    129    10    852     (603  (1,589  (49  (64  (2,305

 

Adjustments to operating income

For the year ended December 31, 2012 (M€)

  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate  Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       (179  (55      (234

Effect of changes in fair value

   (9              (9

Restructuring charges

       (2          (2

Asset impairment charges

   (1,200  (206  (68      (1,474

Other items

   (586  (18  (174  (88  (866

Total

   (1,795  (405  (297  (88  (2,585

Adjustments to net income, Group share

For the year ended December 31, 2012 (M€)

  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate  Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       (116  (41      (157

Effect of changes in fair value

   (7              (7

Restructuring charges

       (24  (53      (77

Asset impairment charges

   (769  (192  (121  (30  (1,112

Gains (losses) on disposals of assets

   240            341    581  

Other items

   (382  (44  (108  (361  (895

Total

   (918  (376  (323  (50  (1,667

Adjustments to operating income

For the year ended December 31, 2011 (M€)

  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate   Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       928    287         1,215  

Effect of changes in fair value

   45                 45  

Restructuring charges

                      

Asset impairment charges

   (75  (706           (781

Other items

       (75  (17       (92

Total

   (30  147    270         387  

Adjustments to net income, Group share

For the year ended December 31, 2011 (M€)

  Upstream  Refining &
Chemicals
  Marketing &
Services
  Corporate  Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       669    165        834  

Effect of changes in fair value

   32                32  

Restructuring charges

       (72  (50      (122

Asset impairment charges

   (75  (476  (463      (1,014

Gains (losses) on disposals of assets

   843    415    206    74    1,538  

Other items

   (178  (113  (61  (64  (416

Total

   622    423    (203  10    852  

 

Adjustments to operating income
For the year ended December 31, 2010 (M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate   Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       863    130         993  

Restructuring charges

                      

Asset impairment charges

   (203  (1,192  (21       (1,416

Other items

       60    (38       22  

Total

   (203  (269  71         (401
F-30TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013

Adjustments to net income, Group share
For the year ended December 31, 2010 (M)
  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       635    113        748  

TOTAL’s equity share of adjustments related to Sanofi

               (81  (81

Restructuring charges

       (12  (41      (53

Asset impairment charges

   (297  (913  (14      (1,224

Gains (losses) on disposals of assets

   589    122    33    302    1,046  

Other items

   (37  (83  (33      (153

Total

   255    (251  58    221    283  

Adjustments to operating income

For the year ended December 31, 2009 (M)

  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       1,816    389        2,205  

Restructuring charges

                     

Asset impairment charges

   (4  (347  (40      (391

Other items

   (17  (258  (45      (320

Total

   (21  1,211    304        1,494  
      

Adjustments to net income, Group share

For the year ended December 31, 2009 (M)

  Upstream  Downstream  Chemicals  Corporate  Total 

Inventory valuation effect

       1,279    254        1,533  

TOTAL’s equity share of adjustments related to Sanofi

               (300  (300

Restructuring charges

       (27  (102      (129

Asset impairment charges

   (52  (253  (28      (333

Gains (losses) on disposals of assets

               179    179  

Other items

   (112  (182  7        (287

Total

   (164  817    131    (121  663  


E) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON IMPAIRMENTS

In the Upstream, DownstreamRefining & Chemicals, Marketing & Services and ChemicalsHoldings segments, impairments of assets have been recognized for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, with an impact of781792 million in operating income and1,014586 million in net income, Group share. These impairments have been disclosed as adjustments to operating income and adjustments to net income, Group share. These items are identified in paragraph 4D above as adjustment items with the heading “Asset impairment charges”.

The impairment losses impact certain Cash Generating Units (CGU) for which there were indications of impairment, due mainly to changes in the operating conditions or the economic environment of their specific businesses.

The principles applied are the following:

 

the recoverable amount of CGUsCGU’s has been based on their value in use, as defined in Note 1 paragraph L to the Consolidated Financial Statements “Impairment of long-lived assets”;

 

the future cash flows have been determined with the assumptions in the long-term plan of the Group. These assumptions (including future prices of products, supply and demand for products, future production volumes) represent the best estimate by management of the Group of all economic conditions during the remaining life of assets;

 

the future cash flows, based on the long-term plan, are prepared over a period consistent with the life of the assets within the CGU. They are prepared post-tax and include specific risks attached to CGU assets. They are discounted using an 8% post-tax discount rate, this rate being a weighted-average capital cost estimated from historical market data. This rate has been applied consistently for the years ending in 2009, 20102011, 2012 and 2011.2013.

SunPower is a CGU acquired in 2011 for which specific assumptions were applied because of its own financing and its listing on Nasdaq. Thus, future cash flows of this CGU have been discounted using a 14% post-tax discount rate, corresponding to the weighted-average capital cost of this CGU.

 

the value in use calculated by discounting the above post-tax cash flows using an 8% post-tax discount rate is not materially different from value in use calculated by discounting pre-tax cash flows using a pre-tax discount rate determined by an iterative computation from the post-tax value in use. These pre-tax discount rates are in a range from 10%8% to 13%12% in 2011. SunPower’s pre-tax discount rate is 16%.2013.

The CGUs of the Upstream segment affected by these impairments are oil fields, assets in solar energy and investments in associates accounted for by the equity method. For the year ended December 31, 2011,2013 impairments of assets have been recognized in respect of CGUs of the Group has recognized impairmentsUpstream segment with an impact of75651 million in operating income and531442 million in net income, Group share. A 10% decrease These impairments mainly concern shale gas assets

in hydrocarbons prices would not lead to additional impairment losses. In 2011, impairment losses accounted for mainly include the impairmentBarnett basin of the whole goodwill arising from the acquisition of SunPower for383 million. Indeed, the stress on public debt markets of some European states during the second half of 2011, successive austerity plans adopted by these states and their impact on financial incentives specificUnited States due to the solar industry have greatly worsenedpersistent weakness of gas prices in the financial situation and forecasts of future cash flowsAmerican market (Henry Hub). They also include impairments of the solar industry companies, including SunPower. The market capitalizationGroup’s assets in Syria due to a permanent degradation of these companies fell sharplythe security context. A +10% variation in 2011, thus the share price of SunPower as of December 31, 2011 stood at $6.23 per share, down 73% compared to the share price at the acquisition date.

The CGUs of the Downstream segment are affiliates or groups of affiliates (or industrial assets) organized mostly by country for the refining activities and by relevant geographical area for the marketing activities. For the refining activities, the unfavorable trends observedhydrocarbons in 2010identical operating conditions would have continued in 2011, with a worldwide context of surplus in refining capacities compared to the demand for petroleum products. This surplus is still based in Europe with a falling demand, whereas the emerging countries (Middle East and Asia) report a strong growth in the consumption of petroleum products. In this persistent context of deteriorated margins, the refining CGUs in France and in the United Kingdom have suffered substantial operating losses despite the constant efforts to improve operations. This situation, coupled with less favorable outlooks, led the Group to recognize impairments within the CGUs Refining France and United Kingdom with anpositive impact of700 million in operating income of195 million and478126 million in net income, Group share. A variation of +5% of projections of gross margin(1)% in identical operating conditions would have a positive impact of676 million in operating income and443 million in net income, Group share. A variation of (1) % of the discount rate would have a positive impact of335 million in operating income of47 million and21930 million in net income, Group share. InverseFor these assets and certain assets where the value in use is close to the net book value, opposite variations of projections of gross margin and discount ratein the above assumptions would have respective impacts in operating income of respectively

(683)(1,185) million and(249)(619) million, in operating income and of(448)(822) million and(164)(431) million in net income, Group share.

The CGUsadditional impairments that could be recorded in the case of unfavorable evolutions of the price of hydrocarbons or discount rates concern mainly shale gas assets in the Barnett basin of the United States and assets in Australia and Kazakhstan.

The CGUs for the Refining & Chemicals segment are worldwide business units, includingdefined by the legal entities having the operating activities for the refining and petrochemical activities. The CGUs for the other activities of the sector are global divisions, each division grouping together a set of businesses or homogeneous products with commonfor strategic, commercial and industrial characteristics. plans. For the year 2013 the Group recorded impairments of138 million in operating profit and137 million in net income, Group share, mainly linked to the project to adapt the Carling platform in France. In addition, in the context of persistent volatility of European refining margins, the Group did not change impairments on CGUs for refining in France and the United Kingdom. A +5% variation in gross margin under identical operating conditions or a (1)% or a +1% variation in the discount rate would not impact operating income or net income, Group share. An opposite variation in gross margin projections would have an impact in operating income of (31) million and(22) million in net income, Group share. This additional impairment in the case of unfavorable gross margin concerns mainly the Composites activity.

The differentCGUs of Marketing & Services are subsidiaries or groups of subsidiaries organized by relevant geographical zone. For the year 2013 the Group recorded impairments on CGUs of the Marketing & Services segment of3 million in operating profit and7 million in net income, Group share. Different scenarios of sensitivity (gross margin, discount rate, and solar unit sales prices) would not lead to additional impairment losses.impairments on CGUs of this segment.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-31


For the year ended December 31, 2010,2012, impairments of assets have been recognized in the Upstream, DownstreamRefining & Chemicals, Marketing & Services and ChemicalsHolding segments with an impact of1,4161,474 million in operating income and1,2241,112 million in net income, Group share. These impairments have been disclosed as adjustments to operating income and adjustments to net income, Group share.

For the year ended December 31, 2009,2011, impairments of assets have been recognized in the Upstream, DownstreamRefining &

Chemicals and ChemicalsMarketing & Services segments with an impact of413781 million in operating income and3821,014 million in net income, Group share. These impairments have been disclosed as adjustments to operating income for391 million and adjustments to net income, Group share for333 million.share.

ForNo reversal of impairment has been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012, and 2009, no reversal of impairment has been recognized.2011.

 

 

5)INFORMATION BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA

 

(M)  France   Rest of
Europe
   North
America
   Africa   Rest of the
world
   Total 
(M€)  France   Rest of
Europe
   North
America
   Africa   Rest of the
world
   Total 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

            

Non-Group sales

   43,412     96,876     16,815     17,428     15,011     189,542  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   4,533     19,463     14,204     27,444     23,456     89,100  

Capital expenditures

   1,335     4,736     3,130     8,060     8,661     25,922  

For the year ended December 31, 2012

            

Non-Group sales

   45,981     103,862     17,648     17,921     14,649     200,061  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   4,560     17,697     15,220     24,999     19,714     82,190  

Capital expenditures

   1,589     4,406     3,148     7,274     6,526     22,943  

For the year ended December 31, 2011

                        

Non-Group sales

   42,626     81,453     15,917     15,077     29,620     184,693     42,626     81,453     15,917     15,077     29,620     184,693  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   5,637     15,576     14,518     23,546     17,593     76,870     5,637     15,576     14,518     23,546     17,593     76,870  

Capital expenditures

   1,530     3,802     5,245     5,264     8,700     24,541     1,530     3,802     5,245     5,264     8,700     24,541  

For the year ended December 31, 2010

            

Non-Group sales

   36,820     72,636     12,432     12,561     24,820     159,269  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   5,666     14,568     9,584     20,166     13,897     63,881  

Capital expenditures

   1,062     2,629     3,626     4,855     4,101     16,273  

For the year ended December 31, 2009

            

Non-Group sales

   32,437     60,140     9,515     9,808     19,427     131,327  

Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net

   6,973     15,218     8,112     17,312     11,489     59,104  

Capital expenditures

   1,189     2,502     1,739     4,651     3,268     13,349  

6)OPERATING EXPENSES

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Purchases, net of inventory variation(a)(b)

   (113,892)(b)   (93,171  (71,058   (121,113  (126,798  (113,892

Exploration costs

   (1,019  (864  (698   (1,633  (1,446  (1,019

Other operating expenses(c)

   (19,843  (19,135  (18,591   (21,687  (22,784  (19,792

of which non-current operating liabilities (allowances) reversals

   615    387    515     138    436    666  

of which current operating liabilities (allowances) reversals

   (150  (101  (43   4    (51  (150

Operating expenses

   (134,754  (113,170  (90,347   (144,433  (151,028  (134,703

 

(a)Includes taxes paid on oil and gas production in the Upstream segment, namely royalties.

(b)As of December 31, 2011, the Group valuedThe group values under / over liftingoverliftings at market value. The impact in operating expenses is577 million and103 million in net income, Group share as of December 31, 2011.
(c)Principally composed of production and administrative costs (see in particular the payroll costs as detailed in Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements “Payroll and staff”). Also includes for 2012 an amount of €176 million for the exceptional contribution of 4% on the value of the oil stocks established by the second corrective finance act for 2012 in France.This exceptional contribution is due by every person, with the exception of the state, owning volumes of certain types of petroleum products situated in the territory of metropolitan France.

 

7) OTHER INCOME AND OTHER EXPENSE

 

For the year ended
December 31, (M)
  2011 2010 2009 

Gains (losses) on disposal of assets

   1,650    1,117    200  
For the year ended
December 31, (M€)
  2013 2012 2011 

Gains on disposal of assets

   1,501    1,321    1,650  

Foreign exchange gains

   118             6    26    118  

Other

   178    279    114     218    115    178  

Other income

   1,946    1,396    314     1,725    1,462    1,946  

Losses on disposal of assets

   (1,433        

Foreign exchange losses

           (32             

Amortization of other intangible assets (excl. mineral interests)

   (592  (267  (142   (219  (250  (592

Other

   (655  (633  (426   (453  (665  (655

Other expense

   (1,247  (900  (600   (2,105  (915  (1,247

Other income

In 2013, gains on disposals were mainly related to the sale of Transport et Infrastructures Gaz France (TIGF) and the sales of interests in the Upstream segment: 25% interest in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy and all interests in Trinidad & Tobago (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2012, gains and losses on disposal of assets were mainly related to the sale of the interest in Sanofi and to the sale of assets in the Upstream segment (sales in Colombia (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), Great Britain and Nigeria).

F-32TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


In 2011, gains and losses on disposal of assets arewere mainly related to the sale of the interest in CEPSA, to the sale of assets in the Upstream segment (especially the sale of 10% Group’s interest in the Colombian pipeline OCENSA) and to the sale of photocure and coatings resins businesses. These disposals are described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2010, gains and losses on disposal of assets were mainly related to sales of assets in the Upstream segment (sale of the interests in the Valhall and Hod fields in Norway and sale of the interest in Block 31 in Angola, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), as well as the change in the accounting treatment and the disposal of shares of Sanofibusinesses (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Other expense

In 2009, gains and losses2013, the loss on disposal of assets weredisposals is mainly related to the disposalsale to Suncor Energy Inc. of sharesTOTAL’s 49% interest in the Voyageur upgrader project in Canada (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The heading “Other” mainly consists of Sanofi.212 million of restructuring charges in the Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments.

Other expenseIn 2012, the heading “Other” was mainly comprised of a provision for the amount of $398 million in relation to a transaction in progress with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States (see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2011, the heading “Other” iswas mainly comprised of243 million of restructuring charges in the Upstream, DownstreamRefining & Chemicals and ChemicalsMarketing & Services segments.

In 2010, the heading “Other” was mainly comprised of248 million of restructuring charges in the Downstream and Chemicals segments.

In 2009, the heading “Other” was mainly comprised of190 million of restructuring charges in the Downstream and Chemicals segments.

8) OTHER FINANCIAL INCOME AND EXPENSE

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
As of December 31, (M€) 2013 2012 2011 

Dividend income on non-consolidated subsidiaries

   330    255    210    152    223    330  

Capitalized financial expenses

   171    113    117    259    248    171  

Other

   108    74    316    113    87    108  

Other financial income

   609    442    643    524    558    609  

Accretion of asset retirement obligations

   (344  (338  (283  (439  (405  (344

Other

   (85  (69  (62  (90  (94  (85

Other financial expense

   (429  (407  (345  (529  (499  (429

9)INCOME TAXES

Since 1966, the Group had been taxed in accordance with the consolidated income tax treatment approved on a three-year renewable basis by the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry. The approval for the period 2008-2010 expired on December 31, 2010 and TOTAL S.A. announced in July 2011 that it took the decision not to proceed with its initial application for the renewal of this agreement.

As a consequence, TOTAL S.A. is taxed in accordance with the common French tax regime asregime.

Since August 2012, an additional tax to corporate income tax of 3% is due on dividends distributed by French companies or foreign organizations subject to corporate income tax in France. This tax is liable on amounts distributed, the payment of which was due from 2011. The exitAugust 17, 2012, the effective date of the consolidated incomelaw.

The impact of this additional tax treatment has no significant impact, neither onfor the Group’s financial situation nor on the consolidated results.Group is a charge of161 million in 2013 and of120 million in 2012. This additional tax is not tax deductible.

NoIn addition, no deferred tax is recognized for the temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of investments in foreign subsidiaries which are considered to be permanent investments. Undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries considered to be reinvested indefinitely amounted to 27,44431,097 million as of December 31, 2011.2013. The determination of the tax effect relating to such reinvested income is not practicable.

In addition, noNo deferred tax is recognized on unremitted earnings (approximately22,58528,195 million) of the Group’s French subsidiaries since the remittance of such earnings would be tax exempt for the subsidiaries in which the Company owns 95% or more of the outstanding shares.

Income taxes are detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended
December 31, (M)
  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended
December 31, (M€)
  2013 2012 2011 

Current income taxes

   (12,495  (9,934  (7,213   (10,246  (12,430  (12,495

Deferred income taxes

   (1,578  (294  (538   (864  (605  (1,596

Total income taxes

   (14,073  (10,228  (7,751   (11,110  (13,035  (14,091
 

Before netting deferred tax assets and liabilities by fiscal entity, the components of deferred tax balances are as follows:

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Net operating losses and tax carry forwards

   1,584    1,145    1,114     3,325    2,247    1,584  

Employee benefits

   621    535    517     1,190    1,583    1,329  

Other temporary non-deductible provisions

   3,521    2,757    2,184     4,373    3,816    3,521  

Gross deferred tax assets

   5,726    4,437    3,815     8,888    7,646    6,434  

Valuation allowance

   (667  (576  (484   (1,462  (719  (667

Net deferred tax assets

   5,059    3,861    3,331     7,426    6,927    5,767  

Excess tax over book depreciation

   (12,831  (10,966  (9,791   (15,190  (14,083  (12,831

Other temporary tax deductions

   (2,721  (1,339  (1,179   (2,369  (2,697  (2,721

Gross deferred tax liability

   (15,552  (12,305  (10,970   (17,559  (16,780  (15,552

Net deferred tax liability

   (10,493  (8,444  (7,639   (10,133  (9,853  (9,785

Net

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-33


Carried forward tax losses on net operating losses in the table above for3,325 million as of December 31, 2013, includes notably Belgium for575 million, France for567 million and the United States for476 million.

The impairment of deferred tax carry forwards only come from foreign subsidiaries.assets in the table above for1,426 million as of December 31, 2013, relates notably to France for an amount of365 million and to Belgium for an amount of337 million.

After netting deferred tax assets and liabilities by fiscal entity, deferred taxes are presented on the balance sheet as follows:

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 

Deferred tax assets, non-current(note 14)

   1,767    1,378    1,164  

Deferred tax assets, current(note 16)

       151    214  
As of December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Deferred tax assets, non-current

   2,810    2,279    2,070  

Deferred tax liabilities, non-current

   (12,260  (9,947  (8,948   (12,943  (12,132  (11,855

Deferred tax liabilities, current

       (26  (69

Net amount

   (10,493  (8,444  (7,639   (10,133  (9,853  (9,785

The net deferred tax variation in the balance sheet is analyzed as follows:

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Opening balance

   (8,444  (7,639  (6,857   (9,853  (9,785  (7,921

Deferred tax on income

   (1,578  (294  (538   (864  (605  (1,596

Deferred tax on shareholders’ equity(a)

   (55  28    (38   (263  425    136  

Changes in scope of consolidation(b)

   (17  (59  (1   113    69    (17

Currency translation adjustment

   (399  (480  (205   734    43    (387

Closing balance

   (10,493  (8,444  (7,639   (10,133  (9,853  (9,785

 

(a)This amount includes mainly deferred taxes on actuarial gains and losses, current income taxes and deferred taxes for changes in fair value of listed securities classified as financial assets available for sale, as well as deferred taxes related to the cash flow hedgehedges (see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(b)Changes in scope of consolidation include, as of December 31, 2013, the impact of reclassifications in assets classified as held for sale and liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale for €219 million.

Reconciliation between provision for income taxes and pre-tax income:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013 ��2012 2011 

Consolidated net income

   12,581    10,807    8,629     8,661    10,756    12,614  

Provision for income taxes

   14,073    10,228    7,751     11,110    13,035    14,091  

Pre-tax income

   26,654    21,035    16,380     19,771    23,791    26,705  

French statutory tax rate

   36.10%    34.43%    34.43%     38.00%    36.10%    36.10%  

Theoretical tax charge

   (9,622  (7,242  (5,640   (7,513  (8,589  (9,641

Difference between French and foreign income tax rates

   (5,740  (4,921  (3,214   (4,616  (5,944  (5,739

Tax effect of equity in income (loss) of affiliates

   695    672    565     977    726    695  

Permanent differences

   889    1,375    597     852    811    889  

Adjustments on prior years income taxes

   (19  (45  (47       82    (19

Adjustments on deferred tax related to changes in tax rates

   (201  2    (1   2    (69  (201

Changes in valuation allowance of deferred tax assets

   (71  (65  (6   (812  (52  (71

Other

   (4  (4  (5           (4

Net provision for income taxes

   (14,073  (10,228  (7,751   (11,110  (13,035  (14,091

The difference between the French tax rate and the tax rates of foreign subsidiaries is mainly due to the taxation of profits made by the Group in countries where it conducts its exploration and production activities at higher tax rates than French tax rates.

The French statutory tax rate includes the standard corporate tax rate (33.33%) and additional applicable taxes that bring the overall tax rate to 38.00% in 2013 (versus 36.10% in 2011 (versus 34.43% in 20102012 and 2009)2011).

Permanent differences are mainly due to impairment of goodwill and to dividends from non-consolidated companies as well as the specific taxation rules applicable to certain activities.

F-34TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Net operating losses and carried forward tax credit carryforwardscredits

Deferred tax assets related to carried forward tax credits on net operating losses and tax carryforwards expire in the following years:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2013   2012   2011 

As of December 31, (M)

  Basis   Tax   Basis   Tax   Basis   Tax 

2010

                       258     126  

2011

             225     110     170     83  

As of December 31, (M€)

  Basis   Tax   Basis   Tax   Basis   Tax 

2012

   242     115     177     80     121     52                      242     115  

2013

   171     81     146     59     133     43               316     150     171     81  

2014(a)

   104     47     1,807     602     1,804     599  

2015(b)

   8     2     190     62            

2016 and after

   2,095     688                      

2014

   356     171     249     116     104     47  

2015

   270     129     167     75     8     2  

2016(a)

   164     76     26     8     2,095     688  

2017(b)

   410     134     3,187     971            

2018 and after

   3,216     966                      

Unlimited

   2,119     651     774     232     661     211     5,506     1,849     3,049     927     2,119     651  

Total

   4,739     1,584     3,319     1,145     3,147     1,114     9,922     3,325     6,994     2,247     4,739     1,584  

 

(a)

Net operating losses and carried forward tax credit carryforwardscredits in 20142016 and after for 2009.2011.

(b)

Net operating losses and carried forward tax credit carryforwardscredits in 20152017 and after for 2010.2012.

10)INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)  Cost   Amortization and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2013 (M€)  Cost   Amortization and
impairment
 Net 

Goodwill

   1,903     (993  910     1,845     (937  908  

Proved and unproved mineral interests

   13,719     (3,181  10,538  

Proved mineral interests

   8,926     (3,628  5,298  

Unproved mineral interests

   7,563     (1,295  6,268  

Other intangible assets

   3,377     (2,412  965     3,609     (2,742  867  
Total intangible assets  18,999   (6,586) 12,413    21,943     (8,602  13,341  

 

As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Cost   Amortization and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2012 (M€)  Cost   Amortization and
impairment
 Net 

Goodwill

   1,498     (596  902     1,852     (963  889  

Proved and unproved mineral interests

   10,099     (2,712  7,387  

Proved mineral interests

   8,803     (3,291  5,512  

Unproved mineral interests

   6,416     (913  5,503  

Other intangible assets

   2,803     (2,175  628     3,571     (2,617  954  

Total intangible assets

   14,400     (5,483  8,917     20,642     (7,784  12,858  

 

As of December 31, 2009 (M)  Cost   Amortization and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2011 (M€)  Cost   Amortization and
impairment
 Net 

Goodwill

   1,776     (614  1,162     1,903     (993  910  

Proved and unproved mineral interests

   8,204     (2,421  5,783  

Proved mineral interests

   8,319     (2,626  5,693  

Unproved mineral interests

   5,400     (555  4,845  

Other intangible assets

   2,712     (2,143  569     3,377     (2,412  965  

Total intangible assets

   12,692     (5,178  7,514     18,999     (6,586  12,413  

Changes in net intangible assets are analyzed in the following table:

 

(M)  Net
amount
as of
January 1,
   Acquisitions   Disposals Amortization
and
impairment
 Currency
translation
adjustment
   Other Net amount
as of
December 31,
 
(M€)  Net
amount
as of
January 1,
   Acquisitions   Disposals Amortization
and
impairment
 Currency
translation
adjustment
 Other Net amount
as of
December 31,
 

2013

   12,858     2,746     (292  (1,150  (602  (219  13,341  

2012

   12,413     2,466     (58  (1,439  (163  (361  12,858  

2011

   8,917     2,504     (428  (991  358     2,053    12,413     8,917     2,504     (428  (991  358    2,053    12,413  

2010

   7,514     2,466     (62  (553  491     (939  8,917  

2009

   5,341     629     (64  (345  2     1,951    7,514  

 

In 2013, the heading “Other” mainly includes mineral interests in Utica reclassified into acquisitions for(455) million, the reclassification of assets in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” for(70) million (see Note 34 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and the reversal of the reclassification under IFRS 5 as at December 31, 2012 for249 million corresponding to disposals.

In 2012, the heading “Other” mainly included the reclassification of assets in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” for(333) million (see Note 34 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2011, the heading “Other” mainly includesincluded Chesapeake’s Barnett shale mineral interests reclassified

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-35


into the acquisitions for(649) million, the not yet paid part of the acquisition of Chesapeake’s mineral interests in Utica for1,216 million, the reclassification of Joslyn’s mineral interests sold in 2011 and formerly classified in

accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” for384 million, and697 million related to the acquisition of SunPower.

In 2010, the heading “Other” mainly included Chesapeake’s Barnett shale mineral interests reclassified

into the acquisitions for(975) million and the reclassification of Joslyn’s mineral interests in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” for(390) million, including the currency translation adjustment, partially compensated by the acquisition of UTS for646 million (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2009, the heading “Other” mainly included Chesapeake’s Barnett shale mineral interests for1,449 million (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

A summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business segment for the year ended December 31, 20112013 is as follows:

 

(M)  Net goodwill as of
January 1, 2011
   Increases   Impairments  Other  Net goodwill as of
December 31, 2011
 

Upstream

   78     396     (383  (2  89  

Downstream

   82          (1  (12  69  

Chemicals

   717     23     (4  (9  727  

Corporate

   25                  25  

Total

   902     419     (388  (23  910  

In 2011, impairments of goodwill in the Upstream segment amount to383 million and correspond to the impairment of the whole goodwill arising from the acquisition of SunPower (see Note 4E to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(M€)  Net goodwill as of
January 1, 2013
   Increases   Impairments   Other  Net goodwill as of
December 31, 2013
 

Upstream

   2                   2  

Refining & Chemicals

   788     63          (35  816  

Marketing & Services

   74               (9  65  

Corporate

   25                   25  

Total

   889     63          (44  908  

11)PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2013 (M€)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 

Upstream properties

          

Proved properties

   84,222     (54,589  29,633     97,534     (60,489  37,045  

Unproved properties

   209         209     1,038         1,038  

Work in progress

   21,190     (15  21,175     25,138     (41  25,097  

Subtotal

   105,621     (54,604  51,017     123,710     (60,530  63,180  

Other property, plant and equipment

          

Land

   1,346     (398  948     1,339     (422  917  

Machinery, plant and equipment (including transportation equipment)

   25,838     (18,349  7,489     25,537     (19,508  6,029  

Buildings

   6,241     (4,131  2,110     6,563     (4,257  2,306  

Work in progress

   1,534     (306  1,228     1,680     (337  1,343  

Other

   6,564     (4,899  1,665     7,046     (5,062  1,984  

Subtotal

   41,523     (28,083  13,440     42,165     (29,586  12,579  

Total property, plant and equipment

   147,144     (82,687  64,457     165,875     (90,116  75,759  

 

As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2012 (M€)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 

Upstream properties

          

Proved properties

   77,183     (50,582  26,601     87,896     (57,832  30,064  

Unproved properties

   347     (1  346     229         229  

Work in progress

   14,712     (37  14,675     26,645     (172  26,473  

Subtotal

   92,242     (50,620  41,622     114,770     (58,004  56,766  

Other property, plant and equipment

          

Land

   1,304     (393  911     1,354     (407  947  

Machinery, plant and equipment (including transportation equipment)

   23,831     (17,010  6,821     25,501     (19,458  6,043  

Buildings

   6,029     (3,758  2,271     6,489     (4,172  2,317  

Work in progress

   2,350     (488  1,862     1,732     (277  1,455  

Other

   6,164     (4,687  1,477     6,840     (5,036  1,804  

Subtotal

   39,678     (26,336  13,342     41,916     (29,350  12,566  

Total property, plant and equipment

   131,920     (76,956  54,964     156,686     (87,354  69,332  

As of December 31, 2011 (M€)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
  Net 

Upstream properties

     

Proved properties

   84,222     (54,589  29,633  

Unproved properties

   209         209  

Work in progress

   21,190     (15  21,175  

Subtotal

   105,621     (54,604  51,017  

Other property, plant and equipment

     

Land

   1,346     (398  948  

Machinery, plant and equipment (including transportation equipment)

   25,838     (18,349  7,489  

Buildings

   6,241     (4,131  2,110  

Work in progress

   1,534     (306  1,228  

Other

   6,564     (4,899  1,665  

Subtotal

   41,523     (28,083  13,440  

Total property, plant and equipment

   147,144     (82,687  64,457  

As of December 31, 2009 (M)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
  Net 

Upstream properties

     

Proved properties

   71,082     (44,718  26,364  

Unproved properties

   182     (1  181  

Work in progress

   10,351     (51  10,300  

Subtotal

   81,615     (44,770  36,845  

Other property, plant and equipment

     

Land

   1,458     (435  1,023  

Machinery, plant and equipment (including transportation equipment)

   22,927     (15,900  7,027  

Buildings

   6,142     (3,707  2,435  

Work in progress

   2,774     (155  2,619  

Other

   6,506     (4,865  1,641  

Subtotal

   39,807     (25,062  14,745  

Total property, plant and equipment

   121,422     (69,832  51,590  

F-36TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Changes in net property, plant and equipment are analyzed in the following table:

 

(M)  Net amount as
of January 1,
   Acquisitions   Disposals Depreciation and
impairment
 Currency
translation
adjustment
   Other Net amount as of
December 31,
 
(M€)  Net amount as
of January 1,
   Acquisitions   Disposals Depreciation and
impairment
 Currency
translation
adjustment
 Other Net amount as of
December 31,
 

2013

   69,332     19,654     (2,129  (8,908  (3,633  1,443    75,759  

2012

   64,457     17,439     (633  (9,042  (409  (2,480  69,332  

2011

   54,964     15,443     (1,489  (7,636  1,692     1,483    64,457     54,964     15,443     (1,489  (7,636  1,692    1,483    64,457  

2010

   51,590     11,346     (1,269  (8,564  2,974     (1,113  54,964  

2009

   46,142     11,212     (65  (6,765  397     669    51,590  

 

In 2013, the heading “Disposals” mainly includes the impact of sales of assets in the Upstream segment (sale of the Voyageur Upgrader project in Canada and the sale of TOTAL’s interests in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy).

In 2013, the heading “Depreciation and impairment” includes the impact of impairments of assets recognized for792 million (see Note 4D to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2013, the heading “Other” principally corresponds to the increase of the asset for site restitution for an amount of2,069 million. It also includes(405) million related to the reclassification of assets classified in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” and(155) million related to the sale of the fertilizing businesses in Europe.

In 2012, the heading “Disposals” mainly included the impact of sales of assets in the Upstream segment in Great Britain, Norway and Nigeria.

In 2012, the heading “Depreciation and impairment” included the impact of impairments of shale gas assets in the Barnett basin recognized for1,134 million (see Note 4E to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2012, the heading “Other” principally included the reclassification of assets in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” for an amount of2,992 million.

In 2011, the heading “Disposals” mainly includesincluded the impact of sales of assets in the Upstream segment (disposal of the interests in Gassled in Norway and in Joslyn’s field in Canada) and in the DownstreamMarketing & Services segment (disposal of Marketing assets in the United Kingdom) (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2011, the heading “Depreciation and impairment” includesincluded the impact of impairments of assets recognized for781 million (see Note 4D to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2011, the heading “Other” correspondscorresponded to the increase of the asset for sitessite restitution for an amount of653 million. It also includesincluded428 million related to the reclassification of tangible assets of Joslyn and resins businesses sold in 2011 and formerly classified in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations”.

In 2010, the heading “Disposals” mainly included the impact of sales of assets in the Upstream segment (sale of

the interests in the Valhall and Hod fields in Norway and sale of the interest in Block 31 in Angola, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2010, the heading “Depreciation and impairment” included the impact of impairments of assets recognized for1,416 million (see Note 4D to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2010, the heading “Other” mainly corresponded to the change in the consolidation method of Samsung Total Petrochemicals (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) for(541) million and the reclassification for(537) million, including the currency translation adjustment, of property, plant and equipment related to Joslyn, Total E&P Cameroun, and resins businesses subject to a disposal project in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations”, partially compensated by the acquisition of UTS for217 million (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

In 2009, the heading “Other” mainly included changes in net property, plant and equipment related to asset retirement obligations and Chesapeake’s Barnett shale tangible assets for113 million (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Property, plant and equipment presented above includeincludes the following amounts for facilities and equipment under finance leases that have been capitalized:

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2013 (M€)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 

Machinery, plant and equipment

   414     (284  130     391     (314  77  

Buildings

   54     (25  29     54     (26  28  

Other

                 198     (13  185  

Total

   468     (309  159     643     (353  290  
As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2012 (M€)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 

Machinery, plant and equipment

   480     (332  148     391     (294  97  

Buildings

   54     (24  30     54     (26  28  

Other

                 207     (2  205  

Total

   534     (356  178     652     (322  330  
As of December 31, 2009 (M)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 
As of December 31, 2011 (M€)  Cost   Depreciation and
impairment
 Net 

Machinery, plant and equipment

   548     (343  205     414     (284  130  

Buildings

   60     (30  30     54     (25  29  

Other

                            

Total

   608     (373  235     468     (309  159  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-37


12)EQUITY AFFILIATES: INVESTMENTS AND LOANS

The contribution of equity affiliates in the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of income and consolidated statement of comprehensive income is presented below:

        As of December 31, 

Equity value (M)

 

  2011  2010  2009  2011   2010   2009 
  % owned  equity value 

NLNG

   15.00  15.00  15.00  953     1,108     1,136  

PetroCedeño — EM

   30.32  30.32  30.32  1,233     1,136     874  

CEPSA (Upstream share)(d)

       48.83  48.83       340     385  

Angola LNG Ltd.

   13.60  13.60  13.60  869     710     490  

Qatargas

   10.00  10.00  10.00  97     85     83  

Société du Terminal Méthanier de Fos Cavaou

   27.60  28.03  28.79  119     125     124  

Dolphin Energy Ltd (Del) Abu Dhabi

   24.50  24.50  24.50  208     172     118  

Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited II (Train B)

   16.70  16.70  16.70  209     184     143  

Yemen LNG Co

   39.62  39.62  39.62  169     25     (15

Shtokman Development AG

   25.00  25.00  25.00  248     214     162  

AMYRIS(a)

   21.37  22.03      79     101       

Novatek(e)

   14.09          3,368            

Other

               803     724     760  

Total associates

      8,355     4,924     4,260  

Yamal LNG(e)

   20.01          495            

Ichthys LNG Ltd(e)

   24.00          82            

Other

                    78       

Total jointly-controlled entities

               577     78       

Total Upstream

      8,932     5,002     4,260  

CEPSA (Downstream share)(d)

       48.83  48.83       2,151     1,927  

Saudi Aramco Total Refining & Petrochemicals (Downstream share)

   37.50  37.50  37.50  112     47     60  

Other

               166     159     123  

Total associates

      278     2,357     2,110  

SARA(c)

   50.00  50.00      125     134       

TotalErg(a)

   49.00  49.00      296     289       

Other

                    2       

Total jointly-controlled entities

               421     425       

Total Downstream

      699     2,782     2,110  

CEPSA (Chemicals share)(d)

       48.83  48.83       411     396  

Qatar Petrochemical Company Ltd.

   20.00  20.00  20.00  240     221     205  

Saudi Aramco Total Refining & Petrochemicals (Chemicals share)

   37.50  37.50  37.50  9     4     5  

Qatofin Company Limited

   36.36  36.36  36.36  136     27     9  

Other

               27     41     37  

Total associates

      412     704     652  

Samsung Total Petrochemicals(c)

   50.00  50.00      706     645       

Total jointly-controlled entities

               706     645       

Total Chemicals

      1,118     1,349     652  

Sanofi(b)

           7.39            4,235  

Total associates

                4,235  

Total jointly-controlled entities

                           

Total Corporate

                         4,235  

Total investments

      10,749     9,133     11,257  

Loans

               2,246     2,383     2,367  

Total investments and loans

               12,995     11,516     13,624  

Equity value

As of December 31,

(M€)

  2013   2012   2011 

Total Associates

   9,946     9,379     9,045  

Total Joint ventures

   2,281     2,020     1,704  

Total

   12,227     11,399     10,749  

Loans

   2,577     2,360     2,246  

Total

   14,804     13,759     12,995  

Equity share in profit/(loss)

As of December 31,

(M€)

  2013   2012   2011 

Total Associates

   2,438     1,962     1,855  

Total Joint ventures

   133     48     70  

Total

   2,571     2,010     1,925  

Other comprehensive income

As of December 31,

(M€)

  2013  2012   2011 

Total Associates

   (684  95     (34

Total Joint ventures

   (173  65     19  

Total

   (857  160     (15

In cases where the Group holds less than 20% of the voting rights in another entity, the determination of whether the Group exercises significant influence is also based on other facts and circumstances i.e. representation on the board of directors or an equivalent governing body of the entity, participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions relating to dividends or other distributions, significant transactions between the investor and the entity, exchange of management personnel, or provision of essential technical information.

Information (100% gross) relating to significant associates is as follows:

Upstream

   Novatek(a)  Liquefaction entities  PetroCedeño 

(M€)

 2013  2012  2011  2013  2012  2011  2013  2012  2011 

Non current assets

  9,874    8,689    6,508    22,971    23,307    24,396    4,542    4,604    4,518  

Current assets

  2,051    1,252    1,611    5,572    5,669    4,726    3,668    3,410    2,596  

Total Assets

  11,925    9,941    8,119    28,543    28,976    29,122    8,210    8,014    7,114  

Shareholder’s equity

  7,746    7,040    4,478    16,863    15,855    16,586    4,047    4,228    4,067  

Non current liabilities

  3,578    2,060    2,271    8,320    9,615    9,939    135    158    181  

Current liabilities

  601    841    1,370    3,360    3,506    2,597    4,028    3,628    2,866  

Total Liabilities

  11,925    9,941    8,119    28,543    28,976    29,122    8,210    8,014    7,114  

Revenues from sales

  7,044    5,463    3,094    29,160    29,807    23,858    3,100    3,664    3,133  

Net income

  1,993    2,914    845    10,828    10,851    10,112    452    406    181  

Other comprehensive income

  (837  137    (114  (751  (64  92    (185        

% owned

  16.96%    15.34%    14.09%       30.32%    30.32%    30.32%  

Revaluation identifiable assets on equity affiliates

  2,570    2,735    2,737                       

Equity value

  3,884    3,815    3,368    2,627    2,310    2,369    1,227    1,282    1,233  

Equity share in profit/(loss)

  167    34    24    1,526    1,377    1,290    137    123    55  

Equity other comprehensive income

  (448  113    (96  (116  (7  11    (56        

Dividends paid to the Group

  77    69    21    1,189    1,485    1,272    137    47      

 

(a)Investment accounted for byInformation includes estimates at the equity method as from 2010.
(b)

Enddate of the accounting for by the equity method of Sanofi as of July 1st, 2010 (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(c)

Change in the consolidation method as of January 1st, 2010.

(d)

Sale of CEPSA on July 29th, 2011.

(e)Investment accounted for by the equity method as from 2011.

    As of December 31,  For the year ended December 31, 
    2011  2010  2009  2011  2010  2009 
Equity in income (loss) (M)  % owned  Equity in income (loss) 

NLNG

   15.00  15.00  15.00  374    207    227  

PetroCedeño — EM

   30.32  30.32  30.32  55    195    166  

CEPSA (Upstream share)(d)

       48.83  48.83  15    57    23  

Angola LNG Ltd.

   13.60  13.60  13.60  6    8    9  

Qatargas

   10.00  10.00  10.00  196    136    114  

Société du Terminal Méthanier de Fos Cavaou

   27.60  28.03  28.79  13          

Dolphin Energy Ltd (Del) Abu Dhabi

   24.50  24.50  24.50  131    121    94  

Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited II (Train B)

   16.70  16.70  16.70  446    288    8  

Yemen LNG Co

   39.62  39.62  39.62  130    37    34  

Shtokman Development AG

   25.00  25.00  25.00  1    (5  4  

AMYRIS(a)

   21.37  22.03      (23  (3    

Novatek(e)

   14.09          24          

Other

               274    140    180  

Total associates

      1,642    1,181    859  

Yamal LNG(e)

   20.01                    

Ichthys LNG Ltd(e)

   24.00          (7        

Other

               (56  6      

Total jointly-controlled entities

               (63  6      

Total Upstream

      1,579    1,187    859  

CEPSA (Downstream share)(d)

       48.83  48.83  26    172    149  

Saudi Aramco Total Refining & Petrochemicals (Downstream share)

   37.50  37.50  37.50  (27  (19  (12

Other

               24    76    81  

Total associates

      23    229    218  

SARA(c)

   50.00  50.00      11    31      

TotalErg(a)

   49.00  49.00      7    (11    

Other

               1    2      

Total jointly-controlled entities

               19    22      

Total Downstream

      42    251    218  

CEPSA (Chemicals share)(d)

       48.83  48.83  19    78    10  

Qatar Petrochemical Company Ltd.

   20.00  20.00  20.00  89    84    74  

Saudi Aramco Total Refining & Petrochemicals (Chemicals share)

   37.50  37.50  37.50  (3  (1  (1

Qatofin Company Limited

   36.36  36.36  36.36  98    36    (5

Other

               (13  5    1  

Total associates

      190    202    79  

Samsung Total Petrochemicals(c)

   50.00  50.00      114    104      

Total jointly-controlled entities

               114    104      

Total Chemicals

      304    306    79  

Sanofi(b)

           7.39      209    486  

Total associates

          209    486  

Total jointly-controlled entities

                         

Total Corporate

                   209    486  

Total investments

               1,925    1,953    1,642  

(a)Investment accounted for by the equity method as from 2010.
(b)

End of the accounting for by the equity method of Sanofi as of July 1st, 2010 (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(c)

Change in the consolidation method as of January 1st, 2010.

(d)

Sale of CEPSA on July 29th, 2011.

(e)Investment accounted for by the equity method as from 2011.Total’s financial statements.

Novatek, listed in Moscow and London, is the 2nd largest producer of natural gas in Russia. The Group share of Novatek’s market value amounted to4,542 million as at December 31, 2013.

The Group’s interests in associates operating liquefaction plants are combined. The amounts include investments in; Nigeria LNG (15.00%), Angola LNG Ltd. (13.60%), Yemen LNG Co (39.62%), Qatargas (10.00%), Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited II — Train B (16.70%), Oman LNG (5.54%), Brass LNG (17.00%) and Abu Dhabi Gas Lc (5.00%).

PetroCedeño produces and upgrades extra-heavy crude oil in Venezuela.

F-38TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Refining & Chemicals

    Saudi Aramco Total
Refining & Petrochemicals
  Qatar 

(M€)

  2013  2012  2011  2013  2012  2011 

Non current assets

   8,960    7,867    5,893    2,079    1,941    1,964  

Current assets

   965    74    264    926    823    778  

Total Assets

   9,925    7,941    6,157    3,005    2,764    2,742  

Shareholder’s equity

   1,077    472    325    1,906    1,721    1,477  

Non current liabilities

   7,571    7,013    4,835    349    686    994  

Current liabilities

   1,277    456    997    750    357    271  

Total Liabilities

   9,925    7,941    6,157    3,005    2,764    2,742  

Revenues from sales

               1,627    1,446    1,297  

Net income

   (67  (77  (80  760    720    645  

Other comprehensive income

   (45  (8  21    (86  (31  62  

% owned

   37.50%    37.50%    37.50%     

Revaluation identifiable assets on equity affiliates

                         

Equity value

   404    177    121    579    513    376  

Equity share in profit/(loss)

   (25  (29  (30  261    234    187  

Equity other comprehensive income

   (17  (3  8    (26  (8  19  

Dividends paid to the Group

               169    89    76  

Saudi Aramco Total Refining & Petrochemicals is an entity including a refinery in Jubail, Saudi Arabia, with a capacity of 400,000 barrels/day with integrated petrochemical units.

The Group’s interests in associates of the Refining & Chemicals segment, operating steam crackers and polyethylene lines in Qatar have been combined: Qatar Petrochemical Company Ltd. (20.00%) and Qatofin (49.09%).

The information (100% gross) relating to significant joint ventures is as follows:

    Liquefaction entities
(Upstream)
  Samsung Total
Petrochemicals
(Refining & Chemicals)
 

(M€)

  2013  2012  2011  2013  2012  2011 

Non current assets

   9,114    3,427    913    2,744    2,022    1,626  

Current assets exluding cash and cash equivalents

   38    99    60    968    918    780  

Cash and cash equivalents

   260    143    8    114    90    242  

Total Assets

   9,412    3,669    981    3,826    3,030    2,648  

Shareholder’s equity

   625    904    662    1,694    1,516    1,412  

Other non current liabilities

   5    5    10    60    52    38  

Non current financial debts

   7,756    1,867    83    1,002    682    454  

Other current liabilities

   1,026    893    76    512    468    508  

Current financial debts

           150    558    312    236  

Total Liabilities

   9,412    3,669    981    3,826    3,030    2,648  

Revenues from sales

   5            5,412    5,004    4,432  

Depreciation and amortisation

               (150  (166  (130

Interest income

                         

Interest expense

               (16  (26  (20

Income taxes

               (74  (58  (62

Net income

   (70  (63  (29  284    136    228  

Other comprehensive income

   (247  2    41    (40  88    (10

% owned

      50.00%    50.00%    50.00%  

Revaluation identifiable assets on equity affiliates

   709    587    430              

Equity value

   844    781    576    847    758    706  

Equity share in profit/(loss)

   (16  (13  (7  142    68    114  

Equity other comprehensive income

   (140  21    26    (20  44    (5

Dividends paid to the Group

               34    59    49  

The Group’s interests in joint ventures operating liquefaction plants have been combined. The amounts include investments in Yamal LNG in Russia (20.02% direct holding) and Ichthys LNG in Australia (30.00%).

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-39


Samsung Total Petrochemicals is a South Korean company that operates a petrochemical complex in Daesan, South Korea (condensate separator, steam cracker, styrene, paraxylene, polyolefins).

Off balance sheet commitments relating to joint ventures are disclosed in Note 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In Group share, the main aggregated financial items in equity consolidated affiliates, and that have not been presented individually are as follows:

    2013   2012   2011 

As of December 31,

(M€)

  Associates   Joint
ventures
   Associates   Joint
ventures
   Associates   Joint
ventures
 

Non current assets

   2,914     1,059     2,512     714     2,709     673  

Current assets

   1,086     1,103     927     1,001     1,125     1,036  

Total Assets

   4,000     2,162     3,439     1,715     3,834     1,709  

Shareholder’s equity

   1,225     590     1,282     481     1,577     423  

Non current liabilities

   1,614     761     1,306     526     1,272     438  

Current liabilities

   1,161     811     851     708     985     848  

Total Liabilities

   4,000     2,162     3,439     1,715     3,834     1,709  

    2013   2012  2011 

As of December 31,

(M€)

  Associates  Joint
ventures
   Associates   Joint
ventures
  Associates   Joint
ventures
 

Revenues from sales

   2,944    4,150     2,984     3,934    5,429     3,415  

Net income

   372    7     223     (7  329     (37

Other comprehensive income

   (21  13              24     (2

Equity value

   1,225    590     1,282     481    1,577     423  

Dividends paid to the Groupe

   336    36     425     32    367     22  

The equity value of the Group’s share in NovatekShtokman Development AG amounts to4,034254 million as of December 31, 20112013.

In 2007, TOTAL and Gazprom signed an agreement for an equity valuethe first phase of3,368 million.

In Group share, the main financial items development of the equity affiliatesShtokman gas and condensates offshore field located in the Barents Sea. A joint venture, Shtokman Development AG (“SDAG”) (TOTAL, 25%) was created in 2008 to design, build, finance and operate this first phase based on an initial development plan intended to produce 23.7 Bm3/y (0.4 Mboe/d) of gas, with half of the gas being piped to Europe and the other half being exported as LNG.

The studies performed on the Shtokman project demonstrated that initially selected technical solutions had too high capital and operating costs to provide an acceptable return on investment, and led the partners at the first quarter 2012 to redefine the development plan for LNG production only.

Within this framework, TOTAL and Gazprom are pursuing discussions so as follows:to conclude a new agreement reflecting the revised development scheme and replacing the previous agreement of 2007 expired since July 1, 2012. In parallel, TOTAL and Gazprom are pursuing dialogue on technical studies to achieve an economically viable project.

 

As of December 31,

(M)

  2011  2010  2009 

  

  Associates  Jointly-
controlled
entities
  Associates  Jointly-
controlled
entities
  Associates  Jointly-
controlled
entities
 

Assets

   18,088    3,679    19,192    2,770    22,681      

Shareholders’ equity

   9,045    1,704    7,985    1,148    11,257      

Liabilities

   9,043    1,975    11,207    1,622    11,424      
                          
    2011  2010  2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M)  Associates  Jointly-
controlled
entities
  Associates  Jointly-
controlled
entities
  Associates  Jointly-
controlled
entities
 

Revenues from sales

   9,948    5,631    16,529    2,575    14,434      

Pre-tax income

   2,449    119    2,389    166    2,168      

Income tax

   (594  (49  (568  (34  (526    

Net income

   1,855    70    1,821    132    1,642      

13)OTHER INVESTMENTS

The investments detailed below are classified as “Financial assets available for sale” (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

As of December 31, 2011

(M)

  Carrying
amount
   Unrealized gain (loss)  Balance sheet value 

Sanofi(a)

   2,100     351    2,451  

Areva(b)

   69     1    70  

Arkema

              

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group

   1     6    7  

Olympia Energy Fund — energy investment fund

   38     (5  33  

Gevo

   15     (3  12  

Other publicly traded equity securities

   3     (1  2  

Total publicly traded equity securities(c)

   2,226     349    2,575  

BBPP

   62         62  

Ocensa(d)

   85         85  

BTC Limited

   132         132  

Other equity securities

   820         820  

Total other equity securities(c)

   1,099         1,099  

Other investments

   3,325     349    3,674  
               

As of December 31, 2010

(M)

  Carrying
amount
   Unrealized gain (loss)  Balance sheet value 

Sanofi(a)

   3,510     (56  3,454  

Areva(b)

   69     63    132  

Arkema

              

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group

   1     9    10  

Olympia Energy Fund — energy investment fund

   37     (3  34  

Other publicly traded equity securities

   2     (1  1  

Total publicly traded equity securities(c)

   3,619     12    3,631  

BBPP

   60         60  

BTC Limited

   141         141  

Other equity securities

   758         758  

Total other equity securities(c)

   959         959  

Other investments

   4,578     12    4,590  

As of December 31, 2013

(M€)

  Carrying
amount
   Unrealized
gain (loss)
  Balance  sheet
value
 

Areva(a)

   37     32    69  

CME Group

   1     10    11  

Olympia Energy Fund — energy investment fund

   36     (7  29  

Gevo

   5         5  

Other publicly traded equity securities

   1     1    2  

Total publicly traded equity securities(b)

   80     36    116  

BBPP

   58         58  

BTC Limited

   104         104  

Other equity securities

   929         929  

Total other equity securities(b)

   1,091         1,091  

Other investments

   1,171     36    1,207  

As of December 31, 2009

(M)

  Carrying
amount
   Unrealized gain (loss)  Balance sheet value 

Areva(b)

   69     58    127  

Arkema

   15     47    62  

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group

   1     9    10  

Olympia Energy Fund — energy investment fund

   35     (2  33  

Other publicly traded equity securities

              

Total publicly traded equity securities(c)

   120     112    232  

BBPP

   72         72  

BTC Limited

   144         144  

Other equity securities

   714         714  

Total other equity securities(c)

   930         930  

Other investments

   1,050     112    1,162  

F-40TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


As of December 31, 2012

(M€)

  Carrying
amount
   Unrealized
gain (loss)
  Balance  sheet
value
 

Areva(a)

   37     10    47  

CME Group

   1     7    8  

Olympia Energy Fund — energy investment fund

   38     (6  32  

Gevo

   3         3  

Other publicly traded equity securities

   1         1  

Total publicly traded equity securities(b)

   80     11    91  

BBPP

   61         61  

Ocensa

   83         83  

BTC Limited

   119         119  

Other equity securities

   836         836  

Total other equity securities(b)

   1,099         1,099  

Other investments

   1,179     11    1,190  

As of December 31, 2011

(M€)

  Carrying
amount
   Unrealized
gain (loss)
  Balance  sheet
value
 

Sanofi

   2,100     351    2,451  

Areva(a)

   69     1    70  

Arkema

              

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group

   1     6    7  

Olympia Energy Fund — energy investment fund

   38     (5  33  

Gevo

   15     (3  12  

Other publicly traded equity securities

   3     (1  2  

Total publicly traded equity securities(b)

   2,226     349    2,575  

BBPP

   62         62  

Ocensa(c)

   85         85  

BTC Limited

   132         132  

Other equity securities

   820         820  

Total other equity securities(b)

   1,099         1,099  

Other investments

   3,325     349    3,674  

 

(a)End of the accounting for by the equity method of Sanofi as of July 1st, 2010 (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(b)Unrealized gain based on the investment certificate.
(c)(b)Including cumulative impairments of604 €722 million in 2011,5972013, €669 million in 20102012 and599 €604 million in 2009.2011.
(d)(c)End of the accounting for by the equity method of Ocensa in July 2011 (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

14)OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS

 

As of December 31, 2011

(M)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Deferred income tax assets

   1,767         1,767  

As of December 31, 2013

(M€)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Loans and advances(a)

   2,454     (399  2,055     2,953     (361  2,592  

Other

   1,049         1,049     603         603  

Total

   5,270     (399  4,871     3,556     (361  3,195  

 

As of December 31, 2010

(M)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Deferred income tax assets

   1,378         1,378  

As of December 31, 2012

(M€)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Loans and advances(a)

   2,060     (464  1,596     2,593     (386  2,207  

Other

   681         681     456         456  

Total

   4,119     (464  3,655     3,049     (386  2,663  

 

As of December 31, 2009

(M)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Deferred income tax assets

   1,164         1,164  

As of December 31, 2011

(M€)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Loans and advances(a)

   1,871     (587  1,284     2,454     (399  2,055  

Other

   633         633     402         402  

Total

   3,668     (587  3,081     2,856     (399  2,457  

 

(a)Excluding loans to equity affiliates.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-41


Changes in the valuation allowance on loans and advances are detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31,

(M)

  Valuation
allowance as
of January 1,
 Increases Decreases   Currency
translation
adjustment and
other variations
 Valuation
allowance as of
December 31,
 

For the year ended December 31,

(M€)

  

Valuation
allowance as of

January 1,

 Increases Decreases   Currency
translation
adjustment and
other variations
 Valuation
allowance as of
December 31,
 

2013

   (386  (16  7     34    (361

2012

   (399  (16  18     11    (386

2011

   (464  (25  122     (32  (399   (464  (25  122     (32  (399

2010

   (587  (33  220     (64  (464

2009

   (529  (19  29     (68  (587

15)INVENTORIES

 

As of December 31, 2011

(M)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
  Net value 

Crude oil and natural gas

   4,735     (24  4,711  

Refined products

   9,706     (36  9,670  

Chemicals products

   1,489     (103  1,386  

Other inventories

   2,761     (406  2,355  

Total

   18,691     (569  18,122  

As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

As of December 31, 2013

(M€)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Crude oil and natural gas

   4,990         4,990     3,274     (18  3,256  

Refined products

   7,794     (28  7,766     6,430     (111  6,319  

Chemicals products

   1,350     (99  1,251     1,172     (78  1,094  

Trading inventories

   3,191         3,191  

Other inventories

   1,911     (318  1,593     2,697     (534  2,163  

Total

   16,045     (445  15,600     16,764     (741  16,023  

 

As of December 31, 2009 (M)  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

As of December 31, 2012

(M€)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Crude oil and natural gas

   4,581         4,581     3,044     (17  3,027  

Refined products

   6,647     (18  6,629     7,169     (86  7,083  

Chemicals products

   1,234     (113  1,121     1,440     (94  1,346  

Trading inventories

   3,782         3,782  

Other inventories

   1,822     (286  1,536     2,620     (461  2,159  

Total

   14,284     (417  13,867     18,055     (658  17,397  

As of December 31, 2011

(M€)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
  Net value 

Crude oil and natural gas

   3,791     (24  3,767  

Refined products

   7,483     (36  7,447  

Chemicals products

   1,489     (103  1,386  

Trading inventories

   3,233         3,233  

Other inventories

   2,695     (406  2,289  

Total

   18,691     (569  18,122  

Changes in the valuation allowance on inventories are as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  Valuation
allowance as
of January 1,
  Increase (net)  Currency
translation
adjustment and
other variations
  Valuation
allowance as of
December 31,
 

2011

   (445  (83  (41  (569

2010

   (417  (39  11    (445

2009

   (1,115  700    (2  (417

For the year ended December 31,

(M€)

  Valuation
allowance as of
January 1,
  Increase (net)  Currency
translation
adjustment and
other variations
  Valuation
allowance as of
December 31,
 

2013

   (658  (119  36    (741

2012

   (569  (96  7    (658

2011

   (445  (83  (41  (569

16)ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)  Gross
value
   Valuation
allowance
 Net
value
 

As of December 31, 2013

(M€)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
 Net value 

Accounts receivable

   20,532     (483  20,049     17,523     (539  16,984  

Recoverable taxes

   2,398         2,398     2,482         2,482  

Other operating receivables

   7,750     (283  7,467     7,303     (112  7,191  

Deferred income tax

              

Prepaid expenses

   840         840     1,075         1,075  

Other current assets

   62         62     50         50  

Other current assets

   11,050     (283  10,767     10,910     (112  10,798  

 

As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Gross
value
   Valuation
allowance
  Net
value
 

Accounts receivable

   18,635     (476  18,159  

Recoverable taxes

   2,227         2,227  

Other operating receivables

   4,543     (136  4,407  

Deferred income tax

   151         151  

Prepaid expenses

   657         657  

Other current assets

   41         41  

Other current assets

   7,619     (136  7,483  
F-42TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


As of December 31, 2012

(M)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
  Net value 

Accounts receivable

   19,678     (472  19,206  

Recoverable taxes

   2,796         2,796  

Other operating receivables

   6,416     (258  6,158  

Prepaid expenses

   1,085         1,085  

Other current assets

   47         47  

Other current assets

   10,344     (258  10,086  

 

As of December 31, 2009 (M)  Gross
value
   Valuation
allowance
  Net
value
 

Accounts receivable

   16,187     (468  15,719  

Recoverable taxes

   2,156         2,156  

Other operating receivables

   5,214     (69  5,145  

Deferred income tax

   214         214  

Prepaid expenses

   638         638  

Other current assets

   45         45  

Other current assets

   8,267     (69  8,198  

As of December 31, 2011

(M)

  Gross value   Valuation
allowance
  Net value 

Accounts receivable

   20,532     (483  20,049  

Recoverable taxes

   2,398         2,398  

Other operating receivables

   7,750     (283  7,467  

Prepaid expenses

   840         840  

Other current assets

   62         62  

Other current assets

   11,050     (283  10,767  

Changes in the valuation allowance on “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” are as follows:

 

(M)  Valuation
allowance
as of
January 1,
  Increase
(net)
  Currency
translation
adjustments
and other
variations
  Valuation
allowance as of
December 31,
 

Accounts receivable

     

2011

   (476  4    (11  (483

2010

   (468  (31  23    (476

2009

   (460  (17  9    (468

Other current assets

     

2011

   (136  (132  (15  (283

2010

   (69  (66  (1  (136

2009

   (19  (14  (36  (69

For the year ended December 31,

(M€)

  Valuation
allowance
as of
January 1,
  Increase
(net)
  Currency
translation
adjustments
and other
variations
  Valuation
allowance as  of
December 31,
 

Accounts receivable

     

2013

   (472  (88  21    (539

2012

   (483  (56  67    (472

2011

   (476  4    (11  (483

Other current assets

     

2013

   (258  122    24    (112

2012

   (283  26    (1  (258

2011

   (136  (132  (15  (283

 

As of December 31, 2011, the net portion of the overdue receivables includes in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” is3,556 million, of which1,857 million has expired for less than 90 days,365 million has expired between 90 days and 6 months,746 million has expired between 6 and 12 months and588 million has expired for more than 12 months.

As of December 31, 2010, the net portion of the overdue receivables includes in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” is3,141 million, of which1,885 million has expired for less than 90 days,292 million has expired between 90 days and 6 months,299 million has expired between 6 and 12 months and665 million has expired for more than 12 months.

As of December 31, 2009,2013, the net portion of the overdue receivables included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” iswas3,6102,764 million, of which2,1161,135 million has expired forwas due in less than 90 days,486434 million has expiredwas due between 90 days and 6 months,246547 million has expiredwas due between 6 and 12 months and762648 million has expired for more thanwas due after 12 months.

As of December 31, 2012, the net portion of the overdue receivables included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” was3,442 million, of which2,025 million was due in less than 90 days,679 million was due between 90 days and 6 months,260 million was due between 6 and 12 months and478 million was due after 12 months.

As of December 31, 2011, the net portion of the overdue receivables included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” was3,556 million, of which1,857 million was due in less than 90 days,365 million was due between 90 days and 6 months,746 million was due between 6 and 12 months and588 million was due after 12 months.

17)SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Number of TOTAL shares

The Company’s common shares, par value2.50, as of December 31, 20112013 are the only category of shares. Shares may be held in either bearer or registered form.

Double voting rights are granted to holders of shares that are fully-paid and held in the name of the same shareholder for at least two years, with due consideration for the total portion of the share capital represented. Double voting rights are also assigned to restricted shares in the event of an increase in share capital by incorporation of reserves, profits or premiums based on shares already held that are entitled to double voting rights.

Pursuant to the Company’s bylaws (Statuts)(Statutes), no shareholder may cast a vote at a shareholders’ meeting, either by himself or through an agent, representing more than 10% of the total voting rights for the Company’s shares. This limit applies to the aggregated amount of voting rights held directly, indirectly or through voting proxies. However, in the case of double voting rights, this limit may be extended to 20%.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-43


These restrictions no longer apply if any individual or entity, acting alone or in concert, acquires at least two-thirds of the total share capital of the Company, directly or indirectly, following a public tender offer for all of the Company’s shares.

The authorized share capital amounts to 3,417,495,344 shares as of December 31, 2013 compared to 3,421,533,930 shares as of December 31, 2012 and 3,446,401,650 shares as of December 31, 2011 compared to 3,439,391,697 shares as of December 31, 2010 and 3,381,921,458 as of December 31, 2009.2011.

 

Variation of the share capital

 

As of January 1, 2009

2,371,808,074

Shares issued in connection with:

Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options934,780
Exchange guarantee offered to the beneficiaries of Elf Aquitaine share subscription options480,030

Cancellation of shares(a)

(24,800,000

As of January 1,December 31, 2010

2,348,422,884

Shares issued in connection with:

Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options1,218,047

As of January 1, 2011

      2,349,640,931  

Shares issued in connection with:

  Capital increase reserved for employees   8,902,717  
   Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options   5,223,665  

As of December 31, 2011(b)

      2,363,767,313  

Shares issued in connection with:

Capital increase as part of a global free share plan intended for the Group employees1,366,950
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options798,883

As of December 31, 2012

2,365,933,146

Shares issued in connection with:

Capital increase reserved for employees10,802,215
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options942,799

As of December 31, 2013(a)

2,377,678,160

 

(a)Decided by the Board of Directors on July 30, 2009.
(b)Including 109,554,173109,214,448 treasury shares deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity.

The variation of both weighted-average number of shares and weighted-average number of diluted shares respectively used in the calculation of earnings per share and fully-diluted earnings per share is detailed as follows:

 

  2011 2010 2009   2013 2012 2011 

Number of shares as of January 1,

   2,349,640,931    2,348,422,884    2,371,808,074     2,365,933,146    2,363,767,313    2,349,640,931  

Number of shares issued during the year (pro rated)

           

Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options

   3,412,123    412,114    221,393     248,606    663,429    3,412,123  

Exercise of TOTAL share purchase options

       984,800    93,827               

Exchange guarantee offered to the beneficiaries of Elf Aquitaine share subscription options

           393,623  

TOTAL performance shares

   978,503    416,420    1,164,389     1,197,228    991,126    978,503  

Global free TOTAL share plan(a)

   506    15         227    683,868    506  

Capital increase reserved for employees

   5,935,145             7,201,477        5,935,145  

TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A. or by its subsidiaries and deducted from shareholders’ equity

   (112,487,679  (115,407,190  (143,082,095   (110,230,889  (110,304,173  (112,487,679

Weighted-average number of shares

   2,247,479,529    2,234,829,043    2,230,599,211     2,264,349,795    2,255,801,563    2,247,479,529  

Dilutive effect

           

TOTAL share subscription and purchase options

   470,095    1,758,006    1,711,961     554,224    247,527    470,095  

TOTAL performance shares

   6,174,808    6,031,963    4,920,599     4,924,693    7,748,805    6,174,808  

Global free TOTAL share plan(a)

   2,523,233    1,504,071      852,057    1,703,554    2,523,233  

Exchange guarantee offered to the beneficiaries of Elf Aquitaine share subscription options

           60,428  

Capital increase reserved for employees

   303,738    371,493         862,889    1,134,296    303,738  

Weighted-average number of diluted shares

   2,256,951,403    2,244,494,576    2,237,292,199     2,271,543,658    2,266,635,745    2,256,951,403  

 

(a)The Board of Directors approved on May 21, 2010 the implementation and conditions of a global free share plan intended for the Group employees.

 

Capital increase reserved for Group employees

At the shareholders’ meeting held onThe Combined General Meeting of May 21, 2010, the shareholders11, 2012, in its seventeenth resolution, delegated to the Board of Directors the authority to increase the share capital of the Companycarry out in one or more transactions andoccasions within a maximum period of 26twenty-six months, from the datea capital increase reserved for employees belonging to an employee savings plan.

The Combined General Meeting of the meeting, by an amount not exceeding 1.5% of the share capital outstanding on the date of the meeting ofMay 11, 2012, in its eighteenth resolution, also delegated to the Board of Directors at whichthe powers necessary to accomplish in one or more occasions within a decisionmaximum period of eighteen

months, a capital increase with the objective of providing employees with their registered office located outside France with benefits comparable to proceed with an issuance is made reserving subscriptions for such issuancethose granted to the Group employees participatingincluded in a company savings plan. It is being specified that the amountseventeenth resolution of any such capital increase reserved for Group employees was counted against the

aggregate maximum nominal amount Combined General Meeting of share capital increases authorized by the shareholders’ meeting held on May 21, 2010 for issuing new ordinary shares or other securities granting immediate or future access to the Company’s share capital with preferential subscription rights (2.5 billion in nominal value).11, 2012.

Pursuant to this delegation of authorization,these delegations, the Board of Directors, during its October 28, 2010September 18, 2012, meeting, decided to proceed with a capital increase reserved for employees in 2011that included a classic offering and a leveraged offering depending on the employees’ choice, within the limit of 1218 million shares with dividend rights as of January 1,

F-44TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


2012. This capital increase resulted in the subscription of 10,802,215 shares with a par value of2.5 at a unit price of30.70. The issuance of the shares was acknowledged on April 25, 2013.

The prior capital increase reserved for employees of the Group was decided by the Board of Directors on October 28, 2010, under the terms of the authorization of the Combined General Meeting of May 21, 2010, and resulted in the subscription of 8,902,717 shares with a par value of2.5 at a unit price of34.80. The issuance of the shares was acknowledged on April 28, 2011.

Capital increase as part of a global free share plan intended for Group employees

The Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 16, 2008, in its seventeenth resolution, delegated to the Board of Directors the authority to grant, in one or more occasions within a maximum period of thirty-eight months, restricted shares to employees and executive officers of the Company or companies outside France affiliated with the Company, within a limit of 0.8% of the outstanding share capital of the Company as of the date of the decision of the Board of Directors to grant such shares.

Pursuant to this delegation, the Board of Directors, during its May 21, 2010 meeting, determined the terms of a global free share plan intended for Group employees and granted the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer all powers necessary to determine the opening and closing of the subscription period and the subscription price.

implement this plan.

On March 14, 2011,As a result, on July 2, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer decided thatof the subscription period wouldGroup acknowledged the issuance and the final allocation of 1,366,950 ordinary shares with a nominal value of2.50 to beneficiaries designated by the terms defined by the Board of Directors meeting held on May 21, 2010.

On December 31, 2013, 873,475 additional shares may be set from March 16, 2011 to April 1, 2011 included, and acknowledged that the subscription price per ordinary share would be set at34.80. With respect toissued as part of this capital increase, 8,902,717 TOTAL shares were subscribed and created on April 28, 2011.plan.

Share cancellation

Pursuant to the authorization granted by the shareholders’ meeting held on May 11, 2007 authorizingThe Group did not proceed with a reduction of capital by cancellation of shares held by the Company withinduring the limit of 10% of the outstanding capital every 24 months, the Board of Directors decided on July 30, 2009 to cancel 24,800,000 shares acquired in 2008 at an average price of49.28 per share.fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Treasury shares (TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A.)

As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL S.A. holds 8,883,180 of its own shares, representing 0.37% of its share capital, detailed as follows:

8,764,020 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans for Group employees; and

119,160 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.

These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.

As of December 31, 2012, TOTAL S.A. holds 8,060,371 of its own shares, representing 0.34% of its share capital, detailed as follows:

7,994,470 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans for Group employees; and

65,901 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.

These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.

As of December 31, 2011, TOTAL S.A. holdsheld 9,222,905 of its own shares, representing 0.39% of its share capital, detailed as follows:

 

6,712,528 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans for Group employees;

 

2,510,377 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.

These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.

As of December 31, 2010, TOTAL S.A. held 12,156,411 of its own shares, representing 0.52% of its share capital, detailed as follows:

6,012,460 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans for Group employees;

6,143,951 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.

These shares were deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.

As of December 31, 2009, TOTAL S.A. held 15,075,922 of its own shares, representing 0.64% of its share capital, detailed as follows:

6,017,499 shares allocated to covering TOTAL share purchase option plans for Group employees and executive officers;

5,799,400 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans for Group employees; and

3,259,023 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.

These shares were deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.

TOTAL shares held by Group subsidiaries

As of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, TOTAL S.A. held indirectly through its subsidiaries 100,331,268 of its own shares, representing 4.22% of its share capital as of December 31, 2013, 4.24% of its share capital as of December 31, 2012 and 4.24% of its share capital as of December 31, 2011 4.27% of its share capital as of December 31, 2010 and 4.27% of its share capital as of December 31, 2009 detailed as follows:

 

2,023,672 shares held by a consolidated subsidiary, Total Nucléaire, 100% indirectly controlled by TOTAL S.A.; and

 

98,307,596 shares held by subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine (Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval), 100% indirectly controlled by TOTAL S.A.

These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.

Dividend

TOTAL S.A. paid on May 26, 2011March 21, 2013, the third quarterly interim dividend of0.59 per share for the fiscal year 2012 (the ex-dividend date was March 18, 2013). TOTAL S.A. also paid on June 27, 2013, the balance of the dividend of1.140.59 per share for the 20102012 fiscal year (the ex-dividend date was May 23, 2011)June 24, 2013).

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-45


In addition, TOTAL S.A. paid two quarterly interim dividends for the fiscal year 2011:2013:

 

Thethe first quarterly interim dividend of0.570.59 per share for the fiscal year 2011,2013, decided by the Board of Directors on April 28, 2011,25, 2013, was paid on September 22, 201127, 2013 (the ex-dividend date was September 19, 2011)24, 2013); and

 

Thethe second quarterly interim dividend of0.570.59 per share for the fiscal year 2011,2013, decided by the Board of Directors on July 28, 2011,25, 2013, was paid on December 22, 201119, 2013 (the ex-dividend date was December 19, 2011)16, 2013).

The Board of Directors, during its October 27, 201130, 2013 meeting, decided to set the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year 20112013 at0.570.59 per share. This interim dividend will be paid on March 22, 201227, 2014 (the ex-dividend date will be March 19, 2012)24, 2014).

A resolution will be submitted at the shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 201216, 2014 to pay a dividend of2.282.38 per share for the 20112013 fiscal year, i.e. a balance of0.570.61 per share to be distributed after deducting the three quarterly interim dividends of0.570.59 per share that will have already been paid.

Paid-in surplus

In accordance with French law, the paid-in surplus corresponds to share premiums related to shares, contributions or mergers of the parent company which can be

capitalized or used to offset losses if the legal reserve has reached its minimum required level. The amount of the paid-in surplus may also be distributed subject to taxation unless the unrestricted reservesexcept in cases of the parent company are distributed prior to this item.a refund of shareholder contributions.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, paid-in surplus amounted to27,65528,020 million (27,20827,684 million as of December 31, 20102012 and27,17127,655 million as of December 31, 2009)2011).

Reserves

Under French law, 5% of net income must be transferred to the legal reserve until the legal reserve reaches 10% of the nominal value of the share capital. This reserve cannot be distributed to the shareholders other than upon liquidation but can be used to offset losses.

If wholly distributed, the unrestricted reserves of the parent company would be taxed for an approximate amount of568 million as of December 31, 2013 (539 million as of December 31, 2011 (2012 and514539 million as of December 31, 2010 and2011) with regards to additional corporation tax to be applied on regulatory reserves so that they become distributable.

Furthermore, the additional tax to corporate income tax of 3%, due on dividends distributed by French companies or foreign organizations subject to corporate income tax in France, established by the second corrective finance act for 2012 would be payable for an amount of405 million (375 million as of December 31, 2009)2012).

 

 

Other comprehensive income

Detail of other comprehensive income showing items reclassified from equity to net income is presented in the table below:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Actuarial gains and losses

    513     (911   (533

Tax effect

    (216  362    191  

Subtotal items not potentially reclassifiable to profit & loss

    297    (549  (342

Currency translation adjustment

    1,498     2,231     (244    (2,199   (702   1,483  

— Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period

   1,435     2,234     (243    (2,216   (713   1,420   

— Less gain/(loss) included in net income

   (63  3    1      (17  (11  (63 

Available for sale financial assets

    337     (100   38      25     (338   337  

— Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period

   382     (50   38      25     63     382   

— Less gain/(loss) included in net income

   45    50              401    45   

Cash flow hedge

    (84   (80   128      117     65     (84

— Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period

   (131   (195   349      182     152     (131 

— Less gain/(loss) included in net income

   (47  (115  221      65    87    (47 

Share of other comprehensive income of equity affiliates, net amount

    (15  302    234      (857  160    (15

Other

    (2   (7   (5    (4   (14   (3

— Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period

   (2   (7   (5    (4   (14   (3 

— Less gain/(loss) included in net income

                            

Tax effect

    (55  28    (38    (47  63    (55

Subtotal items potentially reclassifiable to profit & loss

    (2,965  (766  1,663  

Total other comprehensive income, net amount

    1,679    2,374    113      (2,668  (1,315  1,321  

F-46TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Tax effects relating to each component of other comprehensive income are as follows:

 

  2011 2010 2009  2013 2012 2011 

For the year ended
December 31, (M)

  Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
effect
 Net
amount
 Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
effect
   Net
amount
 Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
effect
 Net
amount
 

For the year ended

December 31, (M€)

 Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
effect
 Net
amount
 Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
effect
 Net
amount
 Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
effect
 Net
amount
 

Actuarial gains and losses

  513    (216  297    (911  362    (549  (533  191    (342

Subtotal items not potentially reclassifiable to profit & loss

  513    (216  297    (911  362    (549  (533  191    (342

Currency translation adjustment

   1,498        1,498    2,231         2,231    (244      (244  (2,199      (2,199  (702      (702  1,483        1,483  

Available for sale financial assets

   337    (93  244    (100  2     (98  38    4    42    25    (6  19    (338  89    (249  337    (93  244  

Cash flow hedge

   (84  38    (46  (80  26     (54  128    (42  86    117    (41  76    65    (26  39    (84  38    (46

Share of other comprehensive income of equity affiliates, net amount

   (15      (15  302         302    234        234    (857      (857  160        160    (15      (15

Other

   (2      (2  (7       (7  (5      (5  (4      (4  (14      (14  (3      (3

Subtotal items potentially reclassifiable to profit & loss

  (2,918  (47  (2,965  (829  63    (766  1,718    (55  1,663  

Total other comprehensive income

   1,734    (55  1,679    2,346    28     2,374    151    (38  113    (2,405  (263  (2,668  (1,740  425    (1,315  1,185    136    1,321  

Non-controlling interests

As of December 31, 2013, no subsidiary has non-controlling interests that would have a material effect on the Group financial statements.

18)EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS

Liabilities for employee benefits obligations consist of the following:

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011   2010   2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013   2012   2011 

Pension benefits liabilities

   1,268     1,268     1,236     2,244     2,774     2,413  

Other benefits liabilities

   620     605     592     571     701     628  

Restructuring reserves (early retirement plans)

   344     298     212     256     269     344  

Total

   2,232     2,171     2,040     3,071     3,744     3,385  

Net liabilities relating to assets held for sale

        9       

Description of plans and risk management

The Group operates for the benefit of its current and former employees both defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans.

The Group recognized a charge of97 million for defined contribution plans in 2013.

The Group’s main defined benefit pension plans are located in France, in the United Kingdom, in the United States, in Belgium and in Germany. Their main characteristics, depending on the country-specific regulatory environment, are the following:

 

Thethe benefits are usually based on the final salary and seniority;

 

Theythey are usually funded (pension fund or insurer); and

Theythey are usually closed to new employees who benefit from defined contribution pension plans.plans; and

they are paid in annuity or in lump sum.

The pension benefits include also termination indemnities and early retirement benefits.

The other benefits are the employer contributioncontributions to post-employment medical care.

In order to manage the inherent risks, the Group has implemented a dedicated governance framework to ensure the supervision of the different plans. These governance rules provide for:

the Group’s representation in key governance bodies or monitoring committees;

the principles of the funding policy;

the general investment policy, including for most plans the establishment of a monitoring committee to define and follow the investment strategy and performance and ensure the principles in respect of investment allocation are respected;

a procedure for to approve the establishment of new plans or amendment of existing plans

principles of administration, communication and reporting

 

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-47


Change in benefit obligations and plan assets

The fair value of the defined benefit obligation and plan assets in the Consolidated Financial Statements is detailed as follows:

 

  Pension benefits Other benefits   Pension benefits Other benefits 
As of December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 2011 2010 2009 

As of December 31, (M€)

  2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 

Change in benefit obligation

              

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

   8,740    8,169    7,405    623    547    544     10,893    9,322    8,740    701    628    623  

Service cost

   163    159    134    13    11    10  

Current service cost

   219    180    163    16    14    13  

Interest cost

   420    441    428    28    29    30     388    429    420    23    29    28  

Curtailments

   (24  (4  (5  (1  (3  (1

Past service cost

   9    204    9    (51  8    3  

Settlements

   (111  (60  (3               (68      (111  (1        

Special termination benefits

                   1      

Plan participants’ contributions

   9    11    10                 8    9    9              

Benefits paid

   (451  (471  (484  (34  (33  (33   (540  (549  (451  (34  (37  (34

Plan amendments

   33    28    118    4    1    (2

Actuarial losses (gains)

   435    330    446    (9  57         (273  1,217    435    (69  58    (9

Foreign currency translation and other

   108    137    120    4    13    (1   (259  81    108    (14  1    4  

Benefit obligation at year-end

   9,322    8,740    8,169    628    623    547     10,377    10,893    9,322    571    701    628  

of which plans entirely or partially funded

   9,632    9,918    8,277              

of which plans not funded

   745    975    1,045    571    701    628  

Change in fair value of plan assets

              

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

   (6,809  (6,286  (5,764               (8,148  (7,028  (6,809            

Expected return on plan assets

   (385  (396  (343            

Interest income

   (307  (339  (338            

Actuarial losses (gains)

   155    (163  (317               (187  (366  108              

Settlements

   80    56    2                 69        80              

Plan participants’ contributions

   (9  (11  (10               (8  (9  (9            

Employer contributions

   (347  (269  (126               (224  (787  (347            

Benefits paid

   386    394    396                 453    452    386              

Foreign currency translation and other

   (99  (134  (124               163    (71  (99            

Fair value of plan assets at year-end

   (7,028  (6,809  (6,286               (8,189  (8,148  (7,028            

Unfunded status

   2,294    1,931    1,883    628    623    547     2,188    2,745    2,294    571    701    628  

Unrecognized prior service cost

   (78  (105  (153  9    10    15  

Unrecognized actuarial (losses) gains

   (1,713  (1,170  (1,045  (17  (28  30  

Asset ceiling

   10    9    9                 21    15    14              

Net recognized amount

   513    665    694    620    605    592     2,208    2,760    2,308    571    701    628  

Pension benefits and other benefits liabilities

   1,268    1,268    1,236    620    605    592     2,244    2,774    2,413    571    701    628  

Other non-current assets

   (755  (603  (542               (36  (23  (105            

Net benefit liabilities relating to assets held for sale

       9                  

The amounts recognized in the consolidated income statement and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for defined benefit plans are detailed as follows:

    Pension benefits  Other benefits 

As of December 31, (M€)

  2013  2012  2011  2013  2012  2011 

Current service cost

   219    180    163    16    14    13  

Past service cost

   9    204    9    (51  8    3  

Settlements

   1        (31  (1        

Net interest cost

   81    90    82    23    29    28  

Benefit amounts recognized in Profit & Loss

   310    474    223    (13  51    44  

Actuarial (Gains) Losses

       

— Effect of changes in demographic assumptions

   4    32    64    (7  (1  (9

— Effect of changes in financial assumptions

   (226  1,030    419    (51  67    10  

— Effect of experience adjustments

   (51  155    (48  (11  (8  (10

— Actual return on plan assets (excluding interest income)

   (187  (366  108              

Effect of asset ceiling

   16    2    (1            

Benefit amounts recognized in Equity

   (444  853    542    (69  58    (9

Total benefit amounts recognized in other comprehensive income

   (134  1,327    765    (82  109    35  

AsThe past service cost recognized in 2012 for204 million is mainly due to the amendment of December 31, 2011, the fair valuecertain French plans.

F-48TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Expected future cash out flow

The average duration of accrued benefits is approximately 15 years for defined pension benefits and 14 years for other pension benefits which are entirely or partially funded amounts to8,277 million and the present value of the unfunded benefits amounts to1,673 million (against7,727 million and1,636 million respectively as of December 31, 2010 and7,206 million and1,510 million respectively as of December 31, 2009).

The experience actuarial (gains) losses related to the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets are as follows:

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011  2010  2009  2008   2007 

Experience actuarial (gains) losses related to the defined benefit obligation

   (58  (54  (108  12     80  

Experience actuarial (gains) losses related to the fair value of plan assets

   155    (163  (317  1,099     140  

As of December 31, (M)  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007 

Pension benefits

      

Benefit obligation

   9,322    8,740    8,169    7,405    8,129  

Fair value of plan assets

   (7,028  (6,809  (6,286  (5,764  (6,604

Unfunded status

   2,294    1,931    1,883    1,641    1,525  

Other benefits

      

Benefits obligation

   628    623    547    544    583  

Fair value of plan assets

                     

Unfunded status

   628    623    547    544    583  

benefits. The Group expects to contributepay contributions of182183 million to itsin respect of funded pension plans in 2012.2014.

Estimated future benefits either financed from plan assets or directly paid by the employer are detailed as follows:

Estimated future payments          
As of December 31, (M€)  Pension benefits   Other benefits 

2014

   566     29  

2015

   540     29  

2016

   550     30  

2017

   583     30  

2018

   541     30  

2019-2023

   2,896     159  

Type of assets

 

Estimated future payments (M)  Pension benefits   Other benefits 

2012

   479     35  

2013

   467     35  

2014

   505     35  

2015

   511     35  

2016

   512     37  

2017-2021

   2,767     191  
Asset allocation  Pension benefits 
As of December 31,  2013   2012   2011 

Equity securities

   30   29   29%  

Debt securities

   64   64   64%  

Monetary

   2   3   4%  

Real estate

   4   4   3%  

Investments on equity and debt markets are quoted on active markets.

Main actuarial assumptions and sensitivity analysis

 

Asset allocation  Pension benefits 
As of December 31,  2011  2010  2009 

Equity securities

   29  34  31%  

Debt securities

   64  60  62%  

Monetary

   4  3  3%  

Real estate

   3  3  4%  

The Group’s assumptions of expected returns on assets are built up by asset class and by country based on long-term bond yields and risk premiums.

Assumptions used to determine benefits
obligations
      Pension benefits  Other benefits 
As of December 31,      2013  2012  2011  2013  2012  2011 

Discount rate (weighted average for all regions)

     4.14  3.79  4.61  4.14  3.82  4.70
  Of which Euro zone   3.40  3.20  4.21  3.44  3.19  4.25
  Of which United States   4.74  4.00  5.00  4.71  4.00  4.97
  Of which United Kingdom   4.50  4.25  4.75   

Inflation rate (weighted average for all regions)

     2.67  2.24  2.35   
  Of which Euro zone   2.00  2.00  2.00   
   Of which United Kingdom   3.50  2.75  3.00            

The discount rate retained correspondsis determined by reference to the rate of primehigh quality rates for AA-rated corporate bonds accordingfor a duration equivalent to that of the obligations. It derives from a benchmark per countrymonetary area of different market data onat the closing date.

Assumptions used to determine benefits
obligations
      Pension benefits  Other benefits 
As of December 31,      2011  2010  2009  2011  2010  2009 

Discount rate (weighted average for all regions)

     4.61  5.01  5.41  4.70  5.00  5.60%  
  Of which Euro zone   4.21  4.58  5.12  4.25  4.55  5.18%  
  Of which United States   5.00  5.49  6.00  4.97  5.42  5.99%  
  Of which United Kingdom   4.75  5.50  5.50            

Average expected rate of salary increase

     4.69  4.55  4.50            

Expected rate of healthcare inflation

         

— initial rate

                 4.82  4.82  4.91%  

— ultimate rate

                  3.77  3.75  3.79%  
    
Assumptions used to determine the net periodic
benefit cost (income)
      Pension benefits  Other benefits 
For the year ended December 31,      2011  2010  2009  2011  2010  2009 

Discount rate (weighted average for all regions)

     5.01  5.41  5.93  5.00  5.60  6.00%  
  Of which Euro zone   4.58  5.12  5.72  4.55  5.18  5.74%  
  Of which United States   5.49  6.00  6.23  5.42  5.99  6.21%  
  Of which United Kingdom   5.50  5.50  6.00          6.00%  

Average expected rate of salary increase

     4.55  4.50  4.56            

Expected return on plan assets

     5.90  6.39  6.14            

Expected rate of healthcare inflation

         

— initial rate

                 4.82  4.91  4.88%  

— ultimate rate

                  3.75  3.79  3.64%  

A 0.5% increase or decrease in discount rates all other things being equal would have the following approximate impact:impact on the benefit obligation:

 

(M)  0.5% increase  0.5% decrease 

Benefit obligation as of December 31, 2011

   (513  551  

2012 net periodic benefit cost (income)

   (41  56  
(M€)  0.5% increase  0.5% decrease 

Benefit obligation as of December 31, 2013

   (728  827  

A 0.5% increase or decrease in expected return on plan assets rate —inflation rates – all other things being equal — would have an impact of31 million on 2012 net periodic benefit cost (income).

The components of the net periodic benefit cost (income) in 2011, 2010 and 2009 are:

    Pension benefits  Other benefits 
For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011  2010  2009  2011  2010  2009 

Service cost

   163    159    134    13    11    10  

Interest cost

   420    441    428    28    29    30  

Expected return on plan assets

   (385  (396  (343            

Amortization of prior service cost

   58    74    13    2    (5  (7

Amortization of actuarial losses (gains)

   46    66    50        (4  (6

Asset ceiling

   2    (3  4              

Curtailments

   (22  (3  (4  (1  (3  (1

Settlements

   (9  7    (1            

Special termination benefits

                   1      

Net periodic benefit cost (income)

   273    345    281    42    29    26  

A positive or negative change of one-percentage-point in the healthcare inflation rate would have the following approximate impact:impact on the benefit obligation:

 

(M)  1% point
increase
   1% point
decrease
 

Benefit obligation as of December 31, 2011

   53     (63

2011 net periodic benefit cost (income)

   5     (5
(M€)  0.5% increase   0.5% decrease 

Benefit obligation as of December 31, 2013

   497     (454

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-49


19)PROVISIONS AND OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011   2010   2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013   2012   2011 

Litigations and accrued penalty claims

   572     485     423     624     930     572  

Provisions for environmental contingencies

   600     644     623     841     556     600  

Asset retirement obligations

   6,884     5,917     5,469     9,287     7,624     6,884  

Other non-current provisions

   1,099     1,116     1,331     1,104     1,028     1,099  

Other non-current liabilities

   1,754     936     1,535     845     1,447     1,754  

Total

   10,909     9,098     9,381     12,701     11,585     10,909  

 

In 2013, litigation reserves mainly include a provision of624 million of which506 million is in the Upstream, notably in Angola and Nigeria. Other risks and commitments that give rise to contingent liabilities are described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2013, other non-current provisions mainly include:

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability) for13 million as of December 31, 2013;

Provisions related to restructuring activities in the Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments for199 million as of December 31, 2013;

Provisions for financial risks related to non-consolidated and equity consolidated affiliates for172 million as of December 31, 2013; and

The contingency reserve regarding guarantees granted in relation to solar panels of SunPower for108 million as of December 31, 2013.

In 2013, other non-current liabilities mainly include debts (whose maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions. This heading is mainly composed of a92 million debt related to the acquisition of an interest in the liquids-rich area of the Utica shale play (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2012, litigation reserves mainly included a provision of $398 million in relation to a transaction in progress with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States (see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). It also included a provision covering risks concerning antitrust investigations related to Arkema for an amount of17 million as of December 31, 2012. Other risks and commitments that give rise to contingent liabilities are described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2012, other non-current provisions mainly included:

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability) for17 million as of December 31, 2012;

Provisions related to restructuring activities in the Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments for196 million as of December 31, 2012;

Provisions for financial risks related to non-consolidated and equity consolidated affiliates for147 million as of December 31, 2012; and

The contingency reserve regarding guarantees granted in relation to solar panels of SunPower for89 million as of December 31, 2012.

In 2012, other non-current liabilities mainly included debts (whose maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions. This heading was mainly composed of a737 million debt related to the acquisition of an interest in theliquids-rich area of the Utica shale play (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2011, litigation reserves mainly includeincluded a provision covering risks concerning antitrust investigations related to Arkema amounting to17 million as of December 31, 2011. Other risks and commitments that give rise to contingent liabilities are described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2011, other non-current provisions mainly include:included:

 

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability) for21 million as of December 31, 2011;

 

Provisions related to restructuring activities in the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals and ChemicalsMarketing & Services segments for211227 million as of December 31, 2011; and

 

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability) for80 million as of December 31, 2011.

In 2011, other non-current liabilities mainly include debts (whose maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions. This heading is mainly composed of a991 million debt related to the acquisition of an interest in the liquids-rich area of the Utica shale play (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2010, litigation reserves mainly included a provision covering risks concerning antitrust investigations related to Arkema amounting to17 million as of December 31, 2010. Other risks and commitments that give rise to contingent liabilities are described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2010, other non-current provisions mainly included:

 

F-50TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability) for31 million as of December 31, 2010;

Provisions related to restructuring activities in the Downstream and Chemicals segments for261 million as of December 31, 2010; and

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability) for194 million as of December 31, 2010.

In 2010, other non-current liabilities mainly included debts (whose maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions.

In 2009, litigation reserves mainly included a provision covering risks concerning antitrust investigations related to Arkema amounting to43 million as of December 31, 2009. Other risks and commitments that give rise to contingent liabilities are described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2009, other non-current provisions mainly included:

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability) for40 million as of December 31, 2009;

Provisions related to restructuring activities in the Downstream and Chemicals segments for130 million as of December 31, 2009; and

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability) for295 million as of December 31, 2009.

In 2009,2011, other non-current liabilities mainly included debts (whose maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions. This heading was mainly composed of

a818991 million debt related to Chesapeakethe acquisition of an interest in the liquids-rich area of the Utica shale play (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

 

Changes in provisions and other non-current liabilities

Changes in provisions and other non-current liabilities are as follows:

 

(M)  As of
January 1,
   Allowances   Reversals Currency
translation
adjustment
   Other As of
December 31,
 
(M€)  As of
January 1,
   Allowances   Reversals Currency
translation
adjustment
 Other   As of
December 31,
 

2013

   11,585     1,309     (1,014  (612  1,433     12,701  

2012

   10,909     1,217     (887  47    299     11,585  

2011

   9,098     921     (798  227     1,461    10,909     9,098     921     (798  227    1,461     10,909  

2010

   9,381     1,052     (971  497     (861  9,098  

2009

   7,858     1,254     (1,413  202     1,480    9,381  

 

Allowances

In 2013, allowances for the period (1,309 million) mainly includes:

Asset retirement obligations for439 million (accretion);

Environmental contingencies for358 million in the Marketing & Services and Refining & Chemicals segments of which272 million is related to the Carling site in France;

Provisions related to restructuring of activities for117 million.

In 2012, allowances of the period (1,217 million) mainly included:

Asset retirement obligations for405 million (accretion);

Environmental contingencies for74 million in the Marketing & Services and Refining & Chemicals segments;

Provisions related to restructuring of activities for74 million.

A provision of $398 million in relation to a transaction in progress with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States (see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In 2011, allowances of the period (921 million) mainly include:included:

 

Asset retirement obligations for344 million (accretion);

 

Environmental contingencies for100 million in the Downstream andRefining & Chemicals segments ;segments; and

 

Provisions related to restructuring of activities for79 million.

Reversals

In 2010, allowances2013, reversals of the period (1,0521,014 million) are mainly included:related to the following incurred expenses:

 

A provision of $398 million in relation to a transaction in progress with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States (see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

AssetProvisions for asset retirement obligations for338 million (accretion);287 million;

 

Environmental contingencies written back for88 million in75 million;

The contingency reserve related to the DownstreamToulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability), written back for4 million;

Provisions for restructuring and Chemicals segments ;social plans written back for76 million.

In 2012, reversals of the period (887 million) were mainly related to the following incurred expenses:

Provisions for asset retirement obligations for314 million;

Environmental contingencies written back for109 million;

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability), written back for10 million;

 

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability), written back for79 million ; and

Provisions related to restructuring of activities for226 million.

In 2009, allowances of the period (1,254 million) mainly included:

Asset retirement obligations for283 million (accretion);

Environmental contingencies for147 million in the Downstream and Chemicals segments;

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability) for22381 million; and

 

Provisions related tofor restructuring of activitiesand social plans written back for121111 million.

Reversals

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-51


In 2011, reversals of the period (798 million) arewere mainly related to the following incurred expenses:

 

Provisions for asset retirement obligations for189 million;

 

Environmental contingencies written back for70 million;

 

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability), written back for10 million;

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability), written back for116 million; and

 

Provisions for restructuring and social plans written back for164 million.

 

In 2010, reversals of the period (971 million) were mainly related to the following incurred expenses:

Provisions for asset retirement obligations for214 million;

26 million for litigation reserves in connection with antitrust investigations;

Environmental contingencies written back for66 million;

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability), written back for9 million;

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability), written back for190 million; and

Provisions for restructuring and social plans written back for60 million.

In 2009, reversals of the period (1,413 million) were mainly related to the following incurred expenses:

Provisions for asset retirement obligations for191 million;

52 million for litigation reserves in connection with antitrust investigations;

Environmental contingencies written back for86 million;

The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant explosion (civil liability), written back for216 million;

The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot explosion (civil liability), written back for375 million; and

Provisions for restructuring and social plans written back for28 million.

 

Changes in the asset retirement obligation

Changes in the asset retirement obligation are as follows:

 

(M)  As of
January 1,
   Accretion   Revision in
estimates
   New
obligations
   Spending
on existing
obligations
 Currency
translation
adjustment
   Other As of
December 31,
 
(M€)  As of
January 1,
   Accretion   Revision in
estimates
   New
obligations
   Spending on
existing
obligations
 Currency
translation
adjustment
 Other As of
December 31,
 

2013

   7,624     439     1,653     416     (287  (523  (35  9,287  

2012

   6,884     405     183     115     (314  82    269    7,624  

2011

   5,917     344     330     323     (189  150     9    6,884     5,917     344     330     323     (189  150    9    6,884  

2010

   5,469     338     79     175     (214  316     (246  5,917  

2009

   4,500     283     447     179     (191  232     19    5,469  

In 2013 the heading “Revision in estimates” includes additional provisions in respect of asset restitution costs and the impact of the revision of the discount rate.

In 2012 the heading “Other” included385 million increase in provisions to cover the costs of abandonment of wells in the Elgin-Franklin field (Great Britain) that will not return to production, and a183 million increase in provisions for

the restoration of the Lacq site in France on which activities are going to be stopped. These amounts were partially offset by sales of assets notably in Great Britain and Norway that have been reclassified in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” (see Note 34 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

20)FINANCIAL DEBT AND RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

A) NON-CURRENT FINANCIAL DEBT AND RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)
(Assets) / Liabilities
  Secured   Unsecured Total 

As of December 31, 2013 (M€)

(Assets) / Liabilities

  Secured   Unsecured Total 

Non-current financial debt

   349     22,208    22,557     519     24,550    25,069  

of which hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (liabilities)

        146    146          236    236  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (assets)(a)

        (1,976  (1,976        (1,028  (1,028

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   349     20,232    20,581     519     23,522    24,041  

Bonds after fair value hedge

        15,148    15,148          18,828    18,828  

Fixed rate bonds and bonds after cash flow hedge

        4,424    4,424          4,408    4,408  

Bank and other, floating rate

   129     446    575     125     179    304  

Bank and other, fixed rate

   76     206    282     114     107    221  

Financial lease obligations

   144     8    152     280         280  

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   349     20,232    20,581     519     23,522    24,041  

 

(a)See the description of these hedging instruments in Notes 1 paragraph M(iii) “Long-term financing”, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of December 31, 2010 (M)
(Assets) / Liabilities
  Secured   Unsecured  Total 

Non-current financial debt

   287     20,496    20,783  

of which hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (liabilities)

        178    178  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (assets)(a)

        (1,870  (1,870

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   287     18,626    18,913  

Bonds after fair value hedge

        15,491    15,491  

Fixed rate bonds and bonds after cash flow hedge

        2,836    2,836  

Bank and other, floating rate

   47     189    236  

Bank and other, fixed rate

   65     110    175  

Financial lease obligations

   175         175  

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   287     18,626    18,913  

F-52TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


As of December 31, 2012 (M€)

(Assets) / Liabilities

  Secured   Unsecured  Total 

Non-current financial debt

   713     21,561    22,274  

of which hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (liabilities)

        11    11  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (assets)(a)

        (1,626  (1,626

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   713     19,935    20,648  

Bonds after fair value hedge

        15,227    15,227  

Fixed rate bonds and bonds after cash flow hedge

        4,504    4,504  

Bank and other, floating rate

   306     29    335  

Bank and other, fixed rate

   81     168    249  

Financial lease obligations

   326     7    333  

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   713     19,935    20,648  

 

(a)See the description of these hedging instruments in Notes 1 paragraph M(iii) “Long-term financing”, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

As of December 31, 2009 (M)
(Assets) / Liabilities
  Secured   Unsecured Total 

As of December 31, 2011 (M€)

(Assets) / Liabilities

  Secured   Unsecured Total 

Non-current financial debt

   312     19,125    19,437     349     22,208    22,557  

of which hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (liabilities)

        241    241          146    146  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (assets)(a)

        (1,025  (1,025        (1,976  (1,976

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   312     18,100    18,412     349     20,232    20,581  

Bonds after fair value hedge

        15,884    15,884          15,148    15,148  

Fixed rate bonds and bonds after cash flow hedge

        1,700    1,700          4,424    4,424  

Bank and other, floating rate

   60     379    439     129     446    575  

Bank and other, fixed rate

   50     79    129     76     206    282  

Financial lease obligations

   202     58    260     144     8    152  

Non-current financial debt — net of hedging instruments

   312     18,100    18,412     349     20,232    20,581  

 

(a)See the description of these hedging instruments in Notes 1 paragraph M(iii) “Long-term financing”, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fair value of bonds, as of December 31, 2011,2013, after taking into account currency and interest rates swaps, is detailed as follows:

 

Bonds after fair value
hedge (M)
  Year of
issue
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2010
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2009
 Currency   Maturity   Initial rate
before
hedging
instruments
Bonds after fair value
hedge (M€)
 Year of
issue
 Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2013
 Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2012
 Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
 Currency Maturity Initial rate
before
hedging
instruments

Parent company

                    

Bond

   1998     129     125     116    FRF     2013    5.000%  1998        127    129    FRF    2013   5.000%

Bond

   2000               61    EUR     2010    5.650%

Current portion (less than one year)

                (61             (127     

Total parent company

      129     125     116         

Total Parent company

          129   

 

Bonds after fair value
hedge (M)
  Year of
issue
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2010
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2009
   Currency   Maturity   

Initial rate

before

hedging

instruments

Bonds after fair value
hedge (M€)
 Year of
issue
 Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2013
 Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2012
 Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
 Currency Maturity Initial rate
before
hedging
instruments

TOTAL CAPITAL(a)

                     

Bond

   2002     15     15     14     USD     2012    5.890%  2002            15    USD    2012   5.890%

Bond

   2003               160     CHF     2010    2.385%  2003        23    23    USD    2013   4.500%

Bond

   2003     23     22     21     USD     2013    4.500%  2004            129    CHF    2012   2.375%

Bond

   2004               53     CAD     2010    4.000%  2004    49    51    52    NZD    2014   6.750%

Bond

   2004               113     CHF     2010    2.385%  2005            63    AUD    2012   5.750%

Bond

   2004               438     EUR     2010    3.750%  2005            200    CHF    2012   2.135%

Bond

   2004               322     GBP     2010    4.875%  2005            65    CHF    2012   2.135%

Bond

   2004               128     GBP     2010    4.875%  2005            97    CHF    2012   2.375%

Bond

   2004               185     GBP     2010    4.875%  2005            404    EUR    2012   3.250%

Bond

   2004          57     53     AUD     2011    5.750%  2005            57    NZD    2012   6.500%

Bond

   2004          116     107     CAD     2011    4.875%  2006            62    AUD    2012   5.625%

Bond

  2006            72    CAD    2012   4.125%

Bonds after fair value
hedge (M)
  Year of
issue
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2010
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2009
   Currency   Maturity   

Initial rate

before

hedging

instruments

Bond

   2004          235     203     USD     2011    4.125%

Bond

   2004          75     69     USD     2011    4.125%

Bond

   2004     129     125     116     CHF     2012    2.375%

Bond

   2004     52     51     47     NZD     2014    6.750%

Bond

   2005          57     53     AUD     2011    5.750%

Bond

   2005          60     56     CAD     2011    4.000%

Bond

   2005          120     112     CHF     2011    1.625%

Bond

   2005          226     226     CHF     2011    1.625%

Bond

   2005          139     144     USD     2011    4.125%

Bond

   2005     63     63     63     AUD     2012    5.750%

Bond

   2005     200     194     180     CHF     2012    2.135%

Bond

   2005     65     65     65     CHF     2012    2.135%

Bond

   2005     97     97     97     CHF     2012    2.375%

Bond

   2005     404     391     363     EUR     2012    3.250%

Bond

   2005     57     57     57     NZD     2012    6.500%

Bond

   2006               75     GBP     2010    4.875%

Bond

   2006               50     EUR     2010    3.750%

Bond

   2006               50     EUR     2010    3.750%

Bond

   2006               100     EUR     2010    3.750%

Bond

   2006          42     42     EUR     2011    EURIBOR

3 months

+0.040%

Bond

   2006          300     300     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2006          150     150     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2006          300     300     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2006          120     120     USD     2011    5.000%

Bond

   2006          300     300     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2006          472     472     USD     2011    5.000%

Bond

   2006     62     62     62     AUD     2012    5.625%

Bond

   2006     72     72     72     CAD     2012    4.125%

Bond

   2006     100     100     100     EUR     2012    3.250%

Bond

   2006     74     74     74     GBP     2012    4.625%

Bond

   2006     100     100     100     EUR     2012    3.250%

Bond

   2006     125     125     125     CHF     2013    2.510%

Bond

   2006     127     127     127     CHF     2014    2.635%

Bond

   2006     130     130     130     CHF     2016    2.385%

Bond

   2006     65     65     65     CHF     2016    2.385%

Bond

   2006     64     64     64     CHF     2016    2.385%

Bond

   2006     63     63     63     CHF     2016    2.385%

Bond

   2006     129     129     129     CHF     2018    3.135%

Bond

   2007               60     CHF     2010    2.385%

Bond

   2007               74     GBP     2010    4.875%

Bond

   2007          77     77     USD     2011    5.000%

Bond

   2007     370     370     370     USD     2012    5.000%

Bond

   2007     222     222     222     USD     2012    5.000%

Bond

   2007     61     61     61     AUD     2012    6.500%

Bond

   2007     72     72     72     CAD     2012    4.125%

Bond

   2007     71     71     71     GBP     2012    4.625%

Bond

   2007     300     300     300     EUR     2013    4.125%

Bond

   2007     73     73     73     GBP     2013    5.500%

Bond

   2007     306     306     306     GBP     2013    5.500%

Bond

   2007     72     72     72     GBP     2013    5.500%

Bond

   2007     248     248     248     CHF     2014    2.635%

Bond

   2007     31     31     31     JPY     2014    1.505%

Bond

   2007     61     61     61     CHF     2014    2.635%

Bond

   2007     49     49     49     JPY     2014    1.723%

Bond

   2007     121     121     121     CHF     2015    3.125%

Bond

   2007     300     300     300     EUR     2017    4.700%

Bond

   2007     76     76     76     CHF     2018    3.135%

December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,
Bonds after fair value
hedge (M)
  Year of
issue
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2010
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2009
   Currency   Maturity   

Initial rate

before

hedging

instruments

Bond

   2007     60     60     60     CHF     2018    3.135%

Bond

   2008               63     GBP     2010    4.875%

Bond

   2008               66     GBP     2010    4.875%

Bond

   2008          92     92     AUD     2011    7.500%

Bond

   2008          100     100     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2008          150     150     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2008          50     50     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2008          50     50     EUR     2011    3.875%

Bond

   2008          60     60     JPY     2011    EURIBOR
6 months
+ 0.018%

Bond

   2008          102     102     USD     2011    3.750%

Bond

   2008     62     62     62     CHF     2012    2.135%

Bond

   2008     124     124     124     CHF     2012    3.635%

Bond

   2008     46     46     46     CHF     2012    2.385%

Bond

   2008     92     92     92     CHF     2012    2.385%

Bond

   2008     64     64     64     CHF     2012    2.385%

Bond

   2008     50     50     50     EUR     2012    3.250%

Bond

   2008     63     63     63     GBP     2012    4.625%

Bond

   2008     63     63     63     GBP     2012    4.625%

Bond

   2008     63     63     63     GBP     2012    4.625%

Bond

   2008     62     62     62     NOK     2012    6.000%

Bond

   2008     69     69     69     USD     2012    5.000%

Bond

   2008     60     60     60     AUD     2013    7.500%

Bond

   2008     61     61     61     AUD     2013    7.500%

Bond

   2008     128     127     127     CHF     2013    3.135%

Bond

   2008     62     62     62     CHF     2013    3.135%

Bond

   2008     200     200     200     EUR     2013    4.125%

Bond

   2008     100     100     100     EUR     2013    4.125%

Bond

   2008     1,000     1,000     1,000     EUR     2013    4.750%

Bond

   2008     63     63     63     GBP     2013    5.500%

Bond

   2008     149     149     149     JPY     2013    EURIBOR
6 months
+ 0.008%

Bond

   2008     191     191     191     USD  ��  2013    4.000%

Bond

   2008     61     61     61     CHF     2015    3.135%

Bond

   2008     62     62     62     CHF     2015    3.135%

Bond

   2008     61     61     61     CHF     2015    3.135%

Bond

   2008     62     62     62     CHF     2018    3.135%

Bond

   2009     56     56     56     AUD     2013    5.500%

Bond

   2009     54     54     54     AUD     2013    5.500%

Bond

   2009     236     236     236     CHF     2013    2.500%

Bond

   2009     77     77     77     USD     2013    4.000%

Bond

   2009     131     131     131     CHF     2014    2.625%

Bond

   2009     998     997     998     EUR     2014    3.500%

Bond

   2009     150     150     150     EUR     2014    3.500%

Bond

   2009     40     40     40     HKD     2014    3.240%

Bond

   2009     107     103     96     AUD     2015    6.000%

Bond

   2009     550     550     550     EUR     2015    3.625%

Bond

   2009     684     684     684     USD     2015    3.125%

Bond

   2009     232     224     208     USD     2015    3.125%

Bond

   2009     99     99     99     CHF     2016    2.385%

Bond

   2009     115     115     115     GBP     2017    4.250%

Bond

   2009     225     225     225     GBP     2017    4.250%

Bond

   2009     448     448     448     EUR     2019    4.875%

Bond

   2009     69     69     69     HKD     2019    4.180%

Bond

   2009          374     347     USD     2021    4.250%

Bond

   2010     105     102          AUD     2014    5.750%

December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,
Bonds after fair value
hedge (M)
  Year of
issue
   Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2010
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2009
  Currency   Maturity   

Initial rate

before

hedging

instruments

Bond

   2010     111    108        CAD     2014    2.500%

Bond

   2010     54    53        NZD     2014    4.750%

Bond

   2010     193    187        USD     2015    2.875%

Bond

   2010     966    935        USD     2015    3.000%

Bond

   2010     70    68        AUD     2015    6.000%

Bond

   2010     71    69        AUD     2015    6.000%

Bond

   2010     64    64        AUD     2015    6.000%

Bond

   2010     773    748        USD     2016    2.300%

Bond

   2010     491    476        EUR     2022    3.125%

Bond

   2011     116            USD     2016    6.500%

Bond

   2011     597            USD     2018    3.875%

Current portion (less than one year)

        (2 992  (3 450  (1,937            

Total TOTAL CAPITAL

        12,617    15,143    15,615              

TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd.(b)

           

Bond

   2011     565            CAD     2014    1.625%

Bond

   2011     565            CAD     2014    USLIBOR
3 months
+ 0.38 %

Bond

   2011     75            CAD     2014    5.750%

Bond

   2011     738            CAD     2013    USLIBOR
3 months
+ 0.09 %

Bond

   2011     82            CAD     2016    4.000%

Bond

   2011     69            CAD     2016    3.625%

Current portion (less than one year)

                    

Total TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd

        2,094                      

TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL(c)

                    

Other consolidated subsidiaries

     308    223    153       

Total bonds after fair value hedge

        15,148    15,491    15,884              

 

December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,December 31,
Bonds after cash flow
hedge and fix rate
bonds
( million)
  Year of
issue
   

Amount after
hedging

as of
December 31,
2011

  

Amount after
hedging

as of
December 31,
2010

   

Amount after
hedging

as of
December 31,
2009

   Currency   Maturity   

Initial rate
before

hedging
instruments

 

TOTAL CAPITAL(a)

             

Bond

   2005     294    293     292     GBP     2012     4.625

Bond

   2009     744    691     602     EUR     2019     4.875

Bond

   2009     386              USD     2021     4.250

Bond

   2009     1,016    917     806     EUR     2024     5.125

Bond

   2010     966    935          USD     2020     4.450

Bond

   2011     386              USD     2021     4.125

Current portion (less than one year)

     (294               

Total TOTAL CAPITAL

        3,498    2,836     1,700                 

Other consolidated subsidiaries(d)

     926                 

Total Bonds after cash flow hedge

        4,424    2,836     1,700                 
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-53


Bonds after fair value
hedge (M€)
 Year of
issue
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2013
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2012
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
  Currency  Maturity  Initial rate
before
hedging
instruments

Bond

  2006            100    EUR    2012   3.250%

Bond

  2006            74    GBP    2012   4.625%

Bond

  2006            100    EUR    2012   3.250%

Bond

  2006        125    125    CHF    2013   2.510%

Bond

  2006    127    127    127    CHF    2014   2.635%

Bond

  2006    130    130    130    CHF    2016   2.385%

Bond

  2006    65    65    65    CHF    2016   2.385%

Bond

  2006    64    64    64    CHF    2016   2.385%

Bond

  2006    63    63    63    CHF    2016   2.385%

Bond

  2006    129    129    129    CHF    2018   3.135%

Bond

  2007            370    USD    2012   5.000%

Bond

  2007            222    USD    2012   5.000%

Bond

  2007            61    AUD    2012   6.500%

Bond

  2007            72    CAD    2012   4.125%

Bond

  2007            71    GBP    2012   4.625%

Bond

  2007        300    300    EUR    2013   4.125%

Bond

  2007        73    73    GBP    2013   5.500%

Bond

  2007        305    306    GBP    2013   5.500%

Bond

  2007        72    72    GBP    2013   5.500%

Bond

  2007    248    248    248    CHF    2014   2.635%

Bond

  2007    31    31    31    JPY    2014   1.505%

Bond

  2007    61    61    61    CHF    2014   2.635%

Bond

  2007    49    49    49    JPY    2014   1.723%

Bond

  2007    121    121    121    CHF    2015   3.125%

Bond

  2007    300    300    300    EUR    2017   4.700%

Bond

  2007    76    76    76    CHF    2018   3.135%

Bond

  2007    60    60    60    CHF    2018   3.135%

Bond

  2008            62    CHF    2012   2.135%

Bond

  2008            124    CHF    2012   3.635%

Bond

  2008            46    CHF    2012   2.385%

Bond

  2008            92    CHF    2012   2.385%

Bond

  2008            64    CHF    2012   2.385%

Bond

  2008            50    EUR    2012   3.250%

Bond

  2008            63    GBP    2012   4.625%

Bond

  2008            63    GBP    2012   4.625%

Bond

  2008            63    GBP    2012   4.625%

Bond

  2008            62    NOK    2012   6.000%

Bond

  2008            69    USD    2012   5.000%

Bond

  2008        60    60    AUD    2013   7.500%

Bond

  2008        61    61    AUD    2013   7.500%

Bond

  2008        127    128    CHF    2013   3.135%

Bond

  2008        62    62    CHF    2013   3.135%

Bond

  2008        200    200    EUR    2013   4.125%

Bond

  2008        100    100    EUR    2013   4.125%

Bond

  2008        999    1,000    EUR    2013   4.750%

Bond

  2008        63    63    GBP    2013   5.500%

Bond

  2008        149    149    JPY    2013   EURIBOR
6 months
+ 0.008%

Bond

  2008        191    191    USD    2013   4.000%

Bond

  2008    61    61    61    CHF    2015   3.135%

Bond

  2008    62    62    62    CHF    2015   3.135%

Bond

  2008    61    61    61    CHF    2015   3.135%

Bond

  2008    62    62    62    CHF    2018   3.135%

Bond

  2009        56    56    AUD    2013   5.500%

Bond

  2009        54    54    AUD    2013   5.500%

Bond

  2009        236    236    CHF    2013   2.500%

Bond

  2009        77    77    USD    2013   4.000%

F-54TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Bonds after fair value
hedge (M€)
 Year of
issue
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2013
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2012
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
  Currency  Maturity  Initial rate
before
hedging
instruments

Bond

  2009    131    131    131    CHF    2014   2.625%

Bond

  2009    997    998    998    EUR    2014   3.500%

Bond

  2009    150    150    150    EUR    2014   3.500%

Bond

  2009    40    40    40    HKD    2014   3.240%

Bond

  2009    100    105    107    AUD    2015   6.000%

Bond

  2009    549    550    550    EUR    2015   3.625%

Bond

  2009    684    684    684    USD    2015   3.125%

Bond

  2009    217    227    232    USD    2015   3.125%

Bond

  2009    99    99    99    CHF    2016   2.385%

Bond

  2009    115    115    115    GBP    2017   4.250%

Bond

  2009    225    225    225    GBP    2017   4.250%

Bond

  2009    451    448    448    EUR    2019   4.875%

Bond

  2009    69    69    69    HKD    2019   4.180%

Bond

  2010    99    103    105    AUD    2014   5.750%

Bond

  2010    66    69    70    AUD    2015   6.000%

Bond

  2010    67    70    71    AUD    2015   6.000%

Bond

  2010    64    64    64    AUD    2015   6.000%

Bond

  2010    104    109    111    CAD    2014   2.500%

Bond

  2010    461    482    491    EUR    2022   3.125%

Bond

  2010    51    53    54    NZD    2014   4.750%

Bond

  2010    181    189    193    USD    2015   2.875%

Bond

  2010    906    947    966    USD    2015   3.000%

Bond

  2010    725    757    773    USD    2016   2.300%

Bond

  2011    560    586    597    GBP    2018   3.875%

Bond

  2011    108    113    116    AUD    2016   6.500%

Bond

  2013    725            USD    2018   1.450%

Current portion (less than one year)

      (2,137  (3,333  (2,992          

Total TOTAL CAPITAL

      7,626    9,204    12,617            

TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd.(b)

       

Bond

  2011    543    567    565    USD    2014   1.625%

Bond

  2011    544    567    565    USD    2014   USLIBOR 3
months +
0.38 %

Bond

  2011    72    76    75    AUD    2014   5.750%

Bond

  2011        743    738    USD    2013   USLIBOR 3
months +
0.09 %

Bond

  2011    80    83    82    NOK    2016   4.000%

Bond

  2011    68    69    69    SEK    2016   3.625%

Bond

  2013    724            USD    2018   1.450%

Bond

  2013    111            AUD    2018   4.000%

Bond

  2013    362            USD    2023   2.750%

Bond

  2013    726            USD    2016   USLIBOR 3
months +
0.38 %

Bond

  2013    707            EUR    2020   4.000%

Current portion (less than one year)

   (1,159  (743       

Total TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd

   

  2,778    1,362    2,094            

TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL(c)

Bond

  2012    75    78        AUD    2017   4.875%

Bond

  2012    725    758        USD    2017   1.500%

Bond

  2012    111    116        AUD    2017   4.125%

Bond

  2012    1,088    1,137        USD    2017   1.550%

Bond

  2012    73    76        NOK    2016   2.250%

Bond

  2012    106    111        NOK    2017   2.250%

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-55


Bonds after fair value
hedge (M€)
 Year of
issue
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2013
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2012
  Fair value
after hedging
as of
December 31,
2011
  Currency  Maturity  Initial rate
before
hedging
instruments

Bond

  2012    464    485        EUR    2023   2.125%

Bond

  2012    362    379        USD    2016   0.750%

Bond

  2012    724    757        USD    2023   2.700%

Bond

  2012    76    80        NOK    2017   2.250%

Bond

  2012    76    79        AUD    2017   3.875%

Bond

  2012    73    76        CAD    2017   2.000%

Bond

  2013    235            EUR    2023   2.125%

Bond

  2013    181            USD    2016   0.750%

Bond

  2013    362            USD    2016   5.750%

Bond

  2013    75            NOK    2018   1.000%

Bond

  2013    363            USD    2018   USLIBOR 3
months +
0.57 %

Bond

  2013    283            EUR    2020   2.125%

Bond

  2013    218            USD    2020   USLIBOR 3
months +
0.75 %

Bond

  2013    724            USD    2024   1.875%

Bond

  2013    69            CAD    2018   2.375%

Bond

  2013    825            EUR    2021   2.125%

Bond

  2013    630            EUR    2025   2.875%

Current portion (less than one year)

                

TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL

      7,918    4,132                

Other consolidated subsidiaries

      506    529    308            

Total bonds after fair value hedge

      18,828    15,227    15,148            

Bonds after cash flow
hedge and fixed rate
bonds (M€)

 Year of
issue
  Amount after
hedging as of
December 31,
2013
  Amount after
hedging as of
December 31,
2012
  Amount after
hedging as of
December 31,
2011
  Currency  Maturity  Initial rate
before
hedging
instruments
 

TOTAL CAPITAL(a)

       

Bond

  2005            294    GBP    2012    4.625

Bond

  2009    651    701    744    EUR    2019    4.875

Bond

  2009    363    379    386    USD    2021    4.250

Bond

  2009    804    926    1,016    EUR    2024    5.125

Bond

  2010    905    947    966    USD    2020    4.450

Bond

  2011    363    379    386    USD    2021    4.125

Bond

  2013    128            CNY    2018    3.750

Current portion (less than one year)

           (294   

Total TOTAL CAPITAL

      3,214    3,332    3,498              

TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd.(b)

       

Bond

  2013    363            USD    2023    2.750

Current portion (less than one year)

                

Total TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd

      363                      

TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL(c)

       

Bond

  2012    725    758        USD    2022    2.875

Current portion (less than one year)

                

Total TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL

      725    758                  

Other consolidated subsidiaries

   106    414    926     

Total Bonds after cash flow hedge

      4,408    4,504    4,424              

F-56TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


 

(a)TOTAL CAPITAL is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. (with the exception of one share held by each member of its Board of Directors). It acts as a financing vehicle for the Group. Its debt securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.
(b)TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd. is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. It acts as a financing vehicle for the activities of the Group in Canada. Its debt securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.
(c)TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. It acts as a financing vehicle for the Group. Its debt securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.
(d)This amount includes SunPower’s convertible bonds for an amount of355 million.

Loan repayment schedule (excluding current portion)

 

As of December 31, 2011
(M)
 Non-current financial
debt
 of which hedging
instruments of
non-current financial
debt (liabilities)
 Hedging instruments
of non-current
financial debt (assets)
 Non-current financial
debt - net of hedging
instruments
 % 
As of December 31,
2013 (M€)
 Non-current financial
debt
 of which hedging
instruments of
non-current financial
debt (liabilities)
 Hedging instruments
of non-current
financial debt (assets)
 Non-current financial
debt – net of hedging
instruments
 % 

2015

  3,625    3    (255  3,370    14%  

2016

  3,441    19    (157  3,284    14%  

2017

  3,094    56    (79  3,015    12%  

2018

  3,386    37    (224  3,162    13%  

2019 and beyond

  11,523    121    (313  11,210    47%  

Total

  25,069    236    (1,028  24,041    100%  
As of December 31,
2012 (M€)
 Non-current financial
debt
 of which hedging
instruments of
non-current financial
debt (liabilities)
 Hedging instruments
of non-current
financial debt (assets)
 Non-current financial
debt – net of hedging
instruments
 % 

2014

  4,163    1    (331  3,832    19%  

2015

  3,903    8    (438  3,465    17%  

2016

  2,335        (210  2,125    10%  

2017

  3,275        (149  3,126    15%  

2018 and beyond

  8,598    2    (498  8,100    39%  

Total

  22,274    11    (1,626  20,648    100%  
As of December 31,
2011 (M€)
 Non-current financial
debt
 of which hedging
instruments of
non-current financial
debt (liabilities)
 Hedging instruments
of non-current
financial debt (assets)
 Non-current financial
debt – net of hedging
instruments
 % 

2013

  5,021    80    (529  4,492    22%    5,021    80    (529  4,492    22%  

2014

  4,020    3    (390  3,630    18%    4,020    3    (390  3,630    18%  

2015

  4,070    6    (456  3,614    18%    4,070    6    (456  3,614    18%  

2016

  1,712    9    (193  1,519    7%    1,712    9    (193  1,519    7%  

2017 and beyond

  7,734    48    (408  7,326    35%    7,734    48    (408  7,326    35%  

Total

  22,557    146    (1,976  20,581    100%    22,557    146    (1,976  20,581    100%  
 
As of December 31, 2010
(M)
 Non-current financial
debt
 of which hedging
instruments of
non-current financial
debt (liabilities)
 Hedging instruments
of non-current
financial debt (assets)
 Non-current financial
debt - net of hedging
instruments
 % 

2012

  3,756    34    (401  3,355    18%  

2013

  4,017    76    (473  3,544    19%  

2014

  2,508    1    (290  2,218    12%  

2015

  3,706    2    (302  3,404    18%  

2016 and beyond

  6,796    65    (404  6,392    33%  

Total

  20,783    178    (1,870  18,913    100%  
 
As of December 31, 2009
(M)
 Non-current financial
debt
 of which hedging
instruments of
non-current financial
debt (liabilities)
 Hedging instruments
of non-current
financial debt (assets)
 Non-current financial
debt - net of hedging
instruments
 % 

2011

  3,857    42    (199  3,658    20%  

2012

  3,468    48    (191  3,277    18%  

2013

  3,781    95    (236  3,545    19%  

2014

  2,199    6    (90  2,109    11%  

2015 and beyond

  6,132    50    (309  5,823    32%  

Total

  19,437    241    (1,025  18,412    100%  

Analysis by currency and interest rate

These analyses take into account interest rate and foreign currency swaps to hedge non-current financial debt.

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011   %   2010   %   2009   % 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013   %   2012   %   2011   % 

U.S. Dollar

   8,645     42%     7,248     39%     3,962     21%     20,236     84%     13,685     66%     8,645     42%  

Euro

   9,582     47%     11,417     60%     14,110     77%     3,542     15%     5,643     27%     9,582     47%  

Other currencies

   2,354     11%     248     1%     340     2%     263     1%     1,320     7%     2,354     11%  

Total

   20,581     100%     18,913     100%     18,412     100%     24,041     100%     20,648     100%     20,581     100%  

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011   %   2010   %   2009   % 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013   %   2012   %   2011   % 

Fixed rate

   4,854     24%     3,177     17%     2,064     11%     4,909     20%     5,085     25%     4,854     24%  

Floating rate

   15,727     76%     15,736     83%     16,348     89%     19,132     80%     15,563     75%     15,727     76%  

Total

   20,581     100%     18,913     100%     18,412     100%     24,041     100%     20,648     100%     20,581     100%  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-57


B) CURRENT FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Current borrowings consist mainly of commercial papers or treasury bills or draws on bank loans. These instruments bear interest at rates that are close to market rates.

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

(Assets) / Liabilities

        

Current financial debt(a)

   5,819    5,867    4,761     4,191    6,392    5,819  

Current portion of non-current financial debt

   3,856    3,786    2,233     3,925    4,624    3,856  

Current borrowings(note 28)

   9,675    9,653    6,994     8,116    11,016    9,675  

Current portion of hedging instruments of debt (liabilities)

   40    12    97     228    84    40  

Other current financial instruments (liabilities)

   127    147    26     48    92    127  

Other current financial liabilities(note 28)

   167    159    123     276    176    167  

Current deposits beyond three months

   (101  (869  (55   (117  (1,093  (101

Current portion of hedging instruments of debt (assets)

   (383  (292  (197   (340  (430  (383

Other current financial instruments (assets)

   (216  (44  (59   (79  (39  (216

Current financial assets(note 28)

   (700  (1,205  (311   (536  (1,562  (700

Current borrowings and related financial assets and liabilities, net

   9,142    8,607    6,806     7,856    9,630    9,142  

 

(a)As of December 31, 2011 and as of December 31, 2010, the current financial debt includes a commercial paper program in Total Capital Canada Ltd. Total Capital Canada Ltd. is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. It acts as a financing vehicle for the activities of the Group in Canada. Its debt securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.

 

C) NET-DEBT-TO-EQUITY RATIO

For its internal and external communication needs, the Group calculates a debt ratio by dividing its net financial debt by equity. Adjusted shareholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 20112013 is calculated after payment of a dividend of2.282.38 per share, subject to approval by the shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2012.16, 2014.

The net-debt-to-equity ratio is calculated as follows:

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

(Assets) / Liabilities

        

Current borrowings

   9,675    9,653    6,994     8,116    11,016    9,675  

Other current financial liabilities

   167    159    123     276    176    167  

Current financial assets

   (700  (1,205  (311   (536  (1,562  (700

Net financial assets and liabilities held for sale or exchange

   (130  756      

Non-current financial debt

   22,557    20,783    19,437     25,069    22,274    22,557  

Hedging instruments on non-current financial debt

   (1,976  (1,870  (1,025   (1,028  (1,626  (1,976

Cash and cash equivalents

   (14,025  (14,489  (11,662   (14,647  (15,469  (14,025

Net financial debt

   15,698    13,031    13,556     17,120    15,565    15,698  

Shareholders’ equity — Group share

   68,037    60,414    52,552     72,629    71,185    66,945  

Distribution of the income based on existing shares at the closing date

   (1,255  (2,553  (2,546   (1,362  (1,299  (1,255

Non-controlling interests

   1,352    857    987     2,281    1,280    1,352  

Adjusted shareholders’ equity

   68,134    58,718    50,993     73,548    71,166    67,042  

Net-debt-to-equity ratio

   23.0%    22.2%    26.6%     23.3%    21.9%    23.4%  

21)OTHER CREDITORS AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011   2010   2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013   2012   2011 

Accruals and deferred income

   231     184     223     217     240     231  

Payable to States (including taxes and duties)

   8,040     7,235     6,024     6,523     7,426     8,040  

Payroll

   1,062     996     955     1,140     1,128     1,062  

Other operating liabilities

   5,441     3,574     4,706     5,941     5,904     5,441  

Total

   14,774     11,989     11,908     13,821     14,698     14,774  

As of December 31, 2013, the heading “Other operating liabilities” includes mainly the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year 2013 for1,361 million. This interim dividend will be paid in March 2014.

As of December 31, 2012, the heading “Other operating liabilities” included mainly the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year 2012 for1,366 million. This interim dividend was paid in March 2013.

As of December 31, 2011, the heading “Other operating liabilities” included mainly includes the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year 2011 for1,317 million. This interim dividend will bewas paid onin March 2012.

As of December 31, 2009, the heading “Other operating liabilities” mainly included744 million related to Chesapeake acquisition (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

F-58TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


22)LEASE CONTRACTS

The Group leases real estate, retail stations, ships, and other equipments (see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

The future minimum lease payments on operating and finance leases to which the Group is committed are shown as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31,
2011 (M)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2012

   762     41  

2013

   552     40  
For the year ended
December 31, 2013 (M€)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2014

   416     37     807     52  

2015

   335     36     657     51  

2016

   316     34     600     48  

2017 and beyond

   940     20  

2017

   459     17  

2018

   361     17  

2019 and beyond

   1,174     206  

Total minimum payments

   3,321     208     4,058     391  

Less financial expenses

        (31      (82

Nominal value of contracts

        177       309  

Less current portion of finance lease contracts

        (25      (29

Outstanding liability of finance lease contracts

        152        280  

 

For the year ended December 31,
2010 (M)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2011

   582     39  

2012

   422     39  

2013

   335     39  
For the year ended
December 31, 2012 (M€)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2013

   781     55  

2014

   569     54  

2015

   514     53  
For the year ended December 31,
2010 (M)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2014

   274     35  

2015

   230     35  

2016 and beyond

   1,105     54  
For the year ended
December 31, 2012 (M€)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2016

   441     51  

2017

   337     19  

2018 and beyond

   971     236  

Total minimum payments

   2,948     241     3,613     468  

Less financial expenses

        (43      (108

Nominal value of contracts

        198       360  

Less current portion of finance lease contracts

        (23      (27

Outstanding liability of finance lease contracts

        175        333  

 

For the year ended December 31,
2009 (M)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2010

   523     42  

2011

   377     43  
For the year ended
December 31, 2011 (M€)
  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 

2012

   299     42     762     41  

2013

   243     41     552     40  

2014

   203     39     416     37  

2015 and beyond

   894     128  

2015

   335     36  

2016

   316     34  

2017 and beyond

   940     20  

Total minimum payments

   2,539     335     3,321     208  

Less financial expenses

        (53      (31

Nominal value of contracts

        282       177  

Less current portion of finance lease contracts

        (22      (25

Outstanding liability of finance lease contracts

        260        152  

Net rental expense incurred under operating leases for the year ended December 31, 20112013 is848 million (against780 million in 2012 and645 million (against605 million in 2010 and613 million in 2009)2011).

 

 

23)COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

  Maturity and installments   Maturity and installments 

As of December 31, 2011

(M)

  Total   Less than
1 year
   Between 1
and 5 years
   More than
5 years
 

Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(Note 20)

   20,429          13,121     7,308  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(Note 20)

   3,488     3,488            

Finance lease obligations(Note 22)

   177     25     134     18  

Asset retirement obligations(Note 19)

   6,884     272     804     5,808  
As of December 31, 2013
(M€)
  Total   Less than
1 year
   Between 1
and 5 years
   More than
5 years
 

Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(note 20)

   23,761          12,721     11,040  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(note 20)

   3,784     3,784            

Finance lease obligations(note 22)

   309     29     110     170  

Asset retirement obligations(note 19)

   9,287     533     1,717     7,037  

Contractual obligations recorded in the balance sheet

   30,978     3,785     14,059     13,134     37,141     4,346     14,548     18,247  

Operating lease obligations (Note 22)

   3,321     762     1,619     940  

Operating lease obligations (note 22)

   4,058     807     2,077     1,174  

Purchase obligations

   77,353     11,049     20,534     45,770     86,275     14,546     24,663     47,066  

Contractual obligations not recorded in the balance sheet

   80,674     11,811     22,153     46,710     90,333     15,353     26,740     48,240  

Total of contractual obligations

   111,652     15,596     36,212     59,844     127,474     19,699     41,288     66,487  

Guarantees given for excise taxes

   1,765     1,594     73     98     1,772     1,485     74     213  

Guarantees given against borrowings

   4,778     3,501     323     954     6,001     80     2,687     3,234  

Indemnities related to sales of businesses

   39          34     5     232     5     98     129  

Guarantees of current liabilities

   376     262     35     79     525     89     169     267  

Guarantees to customers / suppliers

   3,265     1,634     57     1,574     3,528     1,537     138     1,853  

Letters of credit

   2,408     1,898     301     209     1,711     1,351     163     197  

Other operating commitments

   2,477     433     697     1,347     3,043     989     696     1,358  

Total of other commitments given

   15,108     9,322     1,520     4,266     16,812     5,536     4,025     7,251  

Mortgages and liens received

   408     7     119     282     282     15     1     266  

Goods and services sale obligations(a)

   62,216     4,221     17,161     40,834  

Sales obligations

   98,226     7,625     28,063     62,538  

Other commitments received

   6,740     4,415     757     1,568     5,941     3,211     1,269     1,461  

Total of commitments received

   69,364     8,643     18,037     42,684     104,449     10,851     29,333     64,265  

Of which commitments given relating to joint ventures

   8,086     71     401     7,614  

 

(a)As from December 31, 2011, the Group discloses its goods and services sale obligations.
2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-59

    Maturity and installments 
As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Total   Less than
1 year
   Between 1
and 5 years
   More than
5 years
 

Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(Note 20)

   18,738          12,392     6,346  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(Note 20)

   3,483     3,483            

Finance lease obligations(Note 22)

   198     23     129     46  

Asset retirement obligations(Note 19)

   5,917     177     872     4,868  

Contractual obligations recorded in the balance sheet

   28,336     3,683     13,393     11,260  

Operating lease obligations(Note 22)

   2,948     582     1,261     1,105  

Purchase obligations

   61,293     6,347     14,427     40,519  

Contractual obligations not recorded in the balance sheet

   64,241     6,929     15,688     41,624  

Total of contractual obligations

   92,577     10,612     29,081     52,884  

Guarantees given for excise taxes

   1,753     1,594     71     88  

Guarantees given against borrowings

   5,005     1,333     493     3,179  

Indemnities related to sales of businesses

   37          31     6  

Guarantees of current liabilities

   171     147     19     5  

Guarantees to customers / suppliers

   3,020     1,621     96     1,303  

Letters of credit

   1,250     1,247          3  

Other operating commitments

   2,057     467     220     1,370  

Total of other commitments given

   13,293     6,409     930     5,954  

Mortgages and liens received

   429     2     114     313  

Other commitments received

   6,387     3,878     679     1,830  

Total of commitments received

   6,816     3,880     793     2,143  


    Maturity and installments 
As of December 31, 2012
(M€)
  Total   Less than
1 year
   Between 1
and 5 years
   More than
5 years
 

Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(note 20)

   20,315          12,405     7,910  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(note 20)

   4,251     4,251            

Finance lease obligations(note 22)

   360     27     143     190  

Asset retirement obligations(note 19)

   7,624     407     1,429     5,788  

Contractual obligations recorded in the balance sheet

   32,550     4,685     13,977     13,888  

Operating lease obligations (note 22)

   3,613     781     1,861     971  

Purchase obligations

   83,219     12,005     21,088     50,126  

Contractual obligations not recorded in the balance sheet

   86,832     12,786     22,949     51,097  

Total of contractual obligations

   119,382     17,471     36,926     64,985  

Guarantees given for excise taxes

   1,675     1,507     70     98  

Guarantees given against borrowings

   3,952     117     2,695     1,140  

Indemnities related to sales of businesses

   193     4     49     140  

Guarantees of current liabilities

   403     133     105     165  

Guarantees to customers / suppliers

   3,586     1,982     113     1,491  

Letters of credit

   2,298     1,785     252     261  

Other operating commitments

   2,659     753     702     1,204  

Total of other commitments given

   14,766     6,281     3,986     4,499  

Mortgages and liens received

   435     117     8     310  

Sales obligations

   80,514     7,416     26,137     46,961  

Other commitments received

   5,564     3,465     859     1,240  

Total of commitments received

   86,513     10,998     27,004     48,511  

Of which commitments given relating to joint ventures

   7,011          145     6,866  

 

  Maturity and installments   Maturity and installments 
As of December 31,2009 (M)  Total   Less than
1 year
   Between 1
and 5 years
   More than
5 years
 

Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(Note 20)

   18,152          12,443     5,709  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(Note 20)

   2,111     2,111            

Finance lease obligations(Note 22)

   282     22     146     114  

Asset retirement obligations(Note 19)

   5,469     235     972     4,262  

As of December 31, 2011

(M€)

  Total   Less than
1 year
   Between 1
and 5 years
   More than
5 years
 

Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(note 20)

   20,429          13,121     7,308  

Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments(note 20)

   3,488     3,488            

Finance lease obligations(note 22)

   177     25     134     18  

Asset retirement obligations(note 19)

   6,884     272     804     5,808  

Contractual obligations recorded in the balance sheet

   26,014     2,368     13,561     10,085     30,978     3,785     14,059     13,134  

Operating lease obligations(Note 22)

   2,539     523     1,122     894  

Operating lease obligations (note 22)

   3,321     762     1,619     940  

Purchase obligations

   49,808     4,542     9,919     35,347     77,353     11,049     20,534     45,770  

Contractual obligations not recorded in the balance sheet

   52,347     5,065     11,041     36,241     80,674     11,811     22,153     46,710  

Total of contractual obligations

   78,361     7,433     24,602     46,326     111,652     15,596     36,212     59,844  

Guarantees given for excise taxes

   1,765     1,617     69     79     1,765     1,594     73     98  

Guarantees given against borrowings

   2,882     1,383     709     790     4,778     1,027     2,797     954  

Indemnities related to sales of businesses

   36          1     35     39          34     5  

Guarantees of current liabilities

   203     160     38     5     376     262     35     79  

Guarantees to customers / suppliers

   2,770     1,917     70     783     3,265     1,634     57     1,574  

Letters of credit

   1,499     1,485     2     12     2,408     1,898     301     209  

Other operating commitments

   765     582     103     80     2,477     433     697     1,347  

Total of other commitments given

   9,920     7,144     992     1,784     15,108     6,848     3,994     4,266  

Mortgages and liens received

   330     5     106     219     408     7     119     282  

Sales obligations

   62,216     4,221     17,161     40,834  

Other commitments received

   5,637     3,187     481     1,969     6,740     4,415     757     1,568  

Total of commitments received

   5,967     3,192     587     2,188     69,364     8,643     18,037     42,684  

Of which commitments given relating to joint ventures

                    

F-60TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


A. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Debt obligations

“Non-current debt obligations” are included in the items “Non-current financial debt” and “Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt” of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. It includes the non-current portion of swaps hedging bonds, and excludes non-current finance lease obligations of152280 million.

The current portion of non-current debt is included in the items “Current borrowings”, “Current financial assets” and “Other current financial liabilities” of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. It includes the current portion of swaps hedging bonds, and excludes the current portion of finance lease obligations of2529 million.

The information regarding contractual obligations linked to indebtedness is presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Lease contracts

The information regarding operating and finance leases is presented in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Asset retirement obligations

This item represents the discounted present value of Upstream asset retirement obligations, primarily asset removal costs at the completion date. The information regarding contractual obligations linked to asset retirement obligations is presented in Notes 1Q and 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Purchase obligations

Purchase obligations are obligations under contractual agreements to purchase goods or services, including capital projects. These obligations are enforceable and legally binding on the company and specify all significant terms, including the amount and the timing of the payments.

These obligations mainly include: hydrocarbon unconditional purchase contracts (except where an active, highly-liquid market exists and when the hydrocarbons are expected to be re-sold shortly after purchase), reservation of transport capacities in pipelines, unconditional exploration works and development works in the Upstream segment, and contracts for capital investment projects in the DownstreamRefining & Chemicals segment.

B. OTHER COMMITMENTS GIVEN

Guarantees given for excise taxes

They consist of guarantees given to other oil and gas companies in order to comply with French tax authorities’

requirements for oil and gas imports in France. A payment would be triggered by a failure of the guaranteed party with respect to the French tax authorities. The default of the guaranteed parties is however considered to be highly remote by the Group.

Guarantees given against borrowings

The Group guarantees bank debt and finance lease obligations of certain non-consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates. Maturity dates vary, and guarantees will terminate on payment and/or cancellation of the obligation. A payment would be triggered by failure of the guaranteed party to fulfill its obligation covered by the guarantee, and no assets are held as collateral for these guarantees. As of December 31, 2011,2013, the maturities of these guarantees are up to 2023.2028.

Guarantees given against borrowings include the guarantee given in 2008 by TOTAL S.A. in connection with the financing of the Yemen LNG project for an amount of1,208528 million. In turn, certain partners involved in this project have given commitments that could, in the case of Total S.A.’s guarantees being called for the maximum amount, reduce the Group’s exposure by up to404 million, recorded under “Other commitments received”.

In 2010, TOTAL S.A. provided guarantees in connection with the financing of the Jubail project (operated by SAUDI ARAMCO TOTAL Refining and Petrochemical Company (SATORP)) of up to2,4632,311 million, proportional to TOTAL’s share in the project (37.5%). In addition, TOTAL S.A. provided in 2010 a guarantee in favor of its partner in the Jubail project (Saudi Arabian Oil Company) with respect to Total Refining Saudi Arabia SAS’s obligations under the shareholders agreement with respect to SATORP. As of December 31, 2011,2013, this guarantee is of up to1,095892 million and has been recorded under “Other operating commitments”.

In 2013, TOTAL S.A. provided guarantees in connection with the financing of the Ichthys LNG project for an amount of2,218 million.

Indemnities related to sales of businesses

In the ordinary course of business, the Group executes contracts involving standard indemnities in oil industry and indemnities specific to transactions such as sales of businesses. These indemnities might include claims against any of the following: environmental, tax and shareholder matters, intellectual property rights, governmental regulations and employment-related matters,

dealer, supplier, and other commercial contractual relationships. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered by a breach of terms of the contract or by a third party claim. The Group regularly evaluates the probability of having to incur costs associated with these indemnities.

The guarantees related to antitrust investigations granted as part of the agreement relating to the spin-off of Arkema are described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-61


Other guarantees given

Non-consolidated subsidiaries

The Group also guarantees the current liabilities of certain non-consolidated subsidiaries. Performance under these guarantees would be triggered by a financial default of the entity.

Operating agreements

As part of normal ongoing business operations and consistent with generally and accepted recognized industry practices, the Group enters into numerous agreements

with other parties. These commitments are often entered into for commercial purposes, for regulatory purposes or for other operating agreements.

 

C. COMMITMENTS RECEIVED

Goods and services saleSales obligations

These amounts represent binding obligations under contractual agreements to sell goods, or services, including in particular hydrocarbon unconditional sale contracts (except when an active, highly-liquid market exists and volumes are re-sold shortly after purchase).

 

 

24)RELATED PARTIES

The main transactions and balances with related parties (principally non-consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates) are detailed as follows:

 

As of December 31, (M)  2011   2010   2009 
As of December 31, (M€)  2013   2012   2011 

Balance sheet

            

Receivables

            

Debtors and other debtors

   585     432     293     613     646     585  

Loans (excl. loans to equity affiliates)

   331     315     438     341     383     331  

Payables

            

Creditors and other creditors

   724     497     386     876     713     724  

Debts

   31     28     42     13     9     31  
 
For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011   2010   2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013   2012   2011 

Statement of income

            

Sales

   4,400     3,194     2,183     3,865     3,959     4,400  

Purchases

   5,508     5,576     2,958     5,475     5,721     5,508  

Financial expense

        69     1                 

Financial income

   79     74     68     105     106     79  

Compensation for the administration and management bodies

The aggregate amount of direct and indirect compensation accounted for by the French and foreign affiliates of the Company for the executive officers of TOTAL (the members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer) and for the members of the Board of Directors who are employees of the Group, is detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011   2010   2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013   2012   2011 

Number of people

   30     26     27     31     34     30  

Direct or indirect compensation received

   20.4     20.8     19.4     22.1     21.3     20.4  

Pension expenses(a)

   9.4     12.2     10.6     10.0     12.5     6.3  

Other long-term benefits expenses

                              

Termination benefits expenses

   4.8                         4.8  

Share-based payments expense (IFRS 2)(b)

   10.2     10.0     11.2     11.8     10.6     10.2  

 

(a)The benefits provided for executive officers and certain members of the Board of Directors, employees and former employees of the Group, include severance to be paid on retirement, supplementary pension schemes and insurance plans, which represent139.7 €188.7 million provisioned as of December 31, 20112013 (against113.8 €181.3 million as of December 31, 20102012 and96.6 €139.7 million as of December 31, 2009)2011).
(b)Share-based payments expense computed for the executive officers and the members of the Board of Directors who are employees of the Group as described in Note 25 paragraph E to the Consolidated Financial Statements and based on the principles of IFRS 2 “Share-based payments” described in Note 1 paragraph E to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The compensation allocated to members of the Board of Directors for directors’ fees totaled1.25 million in 2013 (1.10 million in 2012 and1.07 million in 2011 (0.96 million in 2010 and0.97 million in 2009)2011).

F-62TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


25)SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

A. TOTAL SHARE SUBSCRIPTION OPTION PLANS

 

 2003 Plan 2004 Plan 2005 Plan 2006 Plan 2007 Plan 2008 Plan 2009 Plan 2010 Plan 2011 Plan Total Weighted
average
exercise
price
  2003 Plan 2004 Plan 2005 Plan 2006 Plan 2007 Plan 2008 Plan 2009 Plan 2010 Plan 2011 Plan Total Weighted
average
exercise
price (€)
 

Date of the shareholders’ meeting

  05/17/2001    05/14/2004    05/14/2004    05/14/2004    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/21/2010    05/21/2010    

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

  05/17/2001    05/14/2004    05/14/2004    05/14/2004    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/11/2007    05/21/2010    05/21/2010    

Date of the award(a)

  07/16/2003    07/20/2004    07/19/2005    07/18/2006    07/17/2007    10/09/2008    09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011      07/16/2003    07/20/2004    07/19/2005    07/18/2006    07/17/2007    10/09/2008    09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011    

Exercise price until May 23, 2006 included(b)

  33.30    39.85    49.73                            

Exercise price since May 24, 2006(b)

  32.84    39.30    49.04    50.60    60.10    42.90    39.90    38.20    33.00    

Exercise price until May 23, 2006 included (€)(b)

  33.30    39.85    49.73                            

Exercise price since May 24, 2006
(€)(b)

  32.84    39.30    49.04    50.60    60.10    42.90    39.90    38.20    33.00    

Expiry date

  07/16/2011    07/20/2012    07/19/2013    07/18/2014    07/17/2015    10/09/2016    09/15/2017    09/14/2018    09/14/2019     07/16/2011    07/20/2012    07/19/2013    07/18/2014    07/17/2015    10/09/2016    09/15/2017    09/14/2018    09/14/2019   

Number of options(c)(b)

                      

Existing options as of January 1, 2008

  8,368,378    13,197,236    6,243,438    5,711,060    5,920,105                    39,440,217    44.23  

Granted

                      4,449,810        ���        4,449,810    42.90  

Cancelled

  (25,184  (118,140  (34,032  (53,304  (34,660  (6,000              (271,320)   44.88  

Exercised

  (841,846  (311,919  (17,702  (6,700                      (1,178,167)   34.89  

Existing options as of January 1, 2009

  7,501,348    12,767,177    6,191,704    5,651,056    5,885,445    4,443,810                42,440,540    44.35  

Granted

                          4,387,620            4,387,620    39.90  

Cancelled

  (8,020  (18,387  (6,264  (5,370  (13,780  (2,180  (10,610          (64,611)   45.04  

Exercised

  (681,699  (253,081                              (934,780)   34.59  

Existing options as of January 1, 2010

  6,811,629    12,495,709    6,185,440    5,645,686    5,871,665    4,441,630    4,377,010            45,828,769    44.12  

Granted

                              4,788,420        4,788,420    38.20  

Cancelled(d)

  (1,420  (15,660  (6,584  (4,800  (5,220  (92,472  (4,040  (1,120      (131,316)   43.50  

Exercised

  (1,075,765  (141,202                  (1,080          (1,218,047)   33.60  

Existing options as of January 1, 2011

  5,734,444    12,338,847    6,178,856    5,640,886    5,866,445    4,349,158    4,371,890    4,787,300        49,267,826    43.80    5,734,444    12,338,847    6,178,856    5,640,886    5,866,445    4,349,158    4,371,890    4,787,300        49,267,826    43.80  

Granted

                                  1,518,840    1,518,840    33.00                                    1,518,840    1,518,840    33.00  

Cancelled(e)

  (738,534  (28,208  (16,320  (17,380  (16,080  (13,260  (14,090  (85,217  (1,000  (930,089)   34.86  

Canceled(c)

  (738,534  (28,208  (16,320  (17,380  (16,080  (13,260  (14,090  (85,217  (1,000  (930,089  34.86  

Exercised

  (4,995,910  (216,115              (200      (2,040  (9,400  (5,223,665)   33.11    (4,995,910  (216,115              (200      (2,040  (9,400  (5,223,665  33.11  

Existing options as of December 31, 2011

      12,094,524    6,162,536    5,623,506    5,850,365    4,335,698    4,357,800    4,700,043    1,508,440    44,632,912    44.87  

Existing options as of January 1, 2012

      12,094,524    6,162,536    5,623,506    5,850,365    4,335,698    4,357,800    4,700,043    1,508,440    44,632,912    44.87  

Granted

                                            

Canceled(c)

      (11,351,931  (2,516  (1,980  (1,380  (3,600  (2,700  (4,140  (3,400  (11,371,647  39.31  

Exercised

      (742,593              (1,630  (20,200  (34,460      (798,883  39.28  

Existing options as of January 1, 2013

          6,160,020    5,621,526    5,848,985    4,330,468    4,334,900    4,661,443    1,505,040    32,462,382    46.96  

Granted

                                            

Canceled(c)

          (6,159,390  (900  (1,020  (360  (1,080  (720      (6,163,470  49.04  

Exercised

          (630          (110,910  (344,442  (122,871  (363,946  (942,799  37.37  

Existing options as of December 31, 2013

              5,620,626    5,847,965    4,219,198    3,989,378    4,537,852    1,141,094    25,356,113    46.82  

 

(a)The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the share subscription options, except for the grant of October 9, 2008, decided by the Board on September 9, 2008.
(b)Exercise price in euro. TheIn order to take into account the four-for-one stock split on May 18, 2006, the exercise prices of TOTAL subscription shares of the plans in force at that date were multiplied by 0.25 to take into accountand the four-for-one stock split onnumber of options awarded, outstanding, canceled or exercised before May 18, 2006.23, 2006 included was multiplied by four. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL subscription shares of these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006.
(c)The number of options awarded, outstanding, canceled or exercised before May 23, 2006 included, was multiplied by four to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the shareholders’ meeting on May 12, 2006.
(d)Out of 92,472 options awarded under the 2008 Plan that were canceled, 88,532 options were canceled due to the performance condition. The acquisition rate applicable to the subscription options that were subject to the performance condition of the 2008 Plan was 60%.
(e)Out of the 930,089 options canceled in 2011, 2012 and 2013, 738,534 options that were not exercised expired on July 16, 2011 due to the expiry of the 2003 subscription option Plan, 11,351,931 options that were not exercised expired on July 16, 2011.20, 2012 due to the expiry of the 2004 Plan and 6,158,662 options that were not exercised expired on July 19, 2013 due to the expiry of the 2005 Plan.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-63


Options are exercisable, subject to a continuous employment condition, after a 2-year period from the date of the Board meeting awarding the options and expire eight years after this date. The underlying shares may not be transferred during four years from the date of grant. For the 2007 to 2011 Plans, the 4-year transfer restriction period does not apply to employees of non-French subsidiaries as of the date of the grant, who may transfer the underlying shares after a 2-year period from the date of the grant.

Since the 2011 Plan, no new TOTAL share subscription option plan or TOTAL share purchase plan was decided.

2011 Plan

For the 2011 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for each grantee other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the options will be finally granted to their beneficiary provided that the performance condition is fulfilled.

The performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average of the Return On Equity (ROE) of the Group. The average ROE is calculatedGroup as published by the Group from theaccording to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.

The acquisition rate:

 

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

 

varies on straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

In addition, as part of the 2011 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that the number of share subscription options finally awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

 

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculatedGroup as published by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equalaccording to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of

options finally granted is based on the average of the Return On Average Capital Employed (ROACE) of the Group. The average ROACE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

2010 Plan

For the 2010 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that:

For each grantee of up to 3,000 options, other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the options will be finally granted to their beneficiary.

For each grantee of more than 3,000 options and less or equal to 50,000 options (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer):

The first 3,000 options and two-thirds above the first 3,000 options will be finally granted to their beneficiary;

The outstanding options, that is one-third of the options above the first 3,000 options, will be finally granted provided that the performance condition described below is fulfilled.

For each grantee of more than 50,000 options (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer):

The first 3,000 options, two-thirds of the options above the first 3,000 options and below the first 50,000 options, and one-third of the options above the first 50,000 options, will be finally granted to their beneficiary;

The outstanding options, that is one-third of the options above the first 3,000 options and below the first 50,000 options and two-thirds of the options above the first 50,000 options, will be finally granted provided that the performance condition is fulfilled.

The performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group based on TOTAL’sits consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 20102011 and 2011. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

In addition, as part of the 2010 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that the number of share subscription options finally awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group based on TOTAL’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

 

For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance condition states that the number of options finally granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group. The average ROACE is calculatedReturn On Average Capital Employed (ROACE) of the Group as published by the Group based on TOTAL’saccording to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 20102011 and 2011.2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

B.TOTAL PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANTS

   2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  2012 Plan  2013 Plan  Total 

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

  05/16/2008    05/16/2008    05/13/2011    05/13/2011    05/13/2011   

Date of the award

  09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011    07/26/2012    07/25/2013   

Date of the final award (end of the vesting period)

  09/16/2011    09/15/2012    09/15/2013    07/27/2014    07/26/2016   

Transfer authorized as from

  09/16/2013    09/15/2014    09/15/2015    07/27/2016    07/26/2018      

Number of performance shares

      

Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

  2,954,336    3,000,637                5,954,973  

Notified

          3,649,770            3,649,770  

Canceled

  (26,214  (10,750  (19,579          (56,543

Finally granted

  (2,928,122  (1,836              (2,929,958

Outstanding as of January 1, 2012

      2,988,051    3,630,191            6,618,242  

Notified

              4,295,930        4,295,930  

Canceled

  832    (32,650  (18,855          (50,673

Finally granted

  (832  (2,955,401  (5,530          (2,961,763

Outstanding as of January 1, 2013

          3,605,806    4,295,930        7,901,736  

Notified

                  4,464,200    4,464,200  

Canceled

          (14,970  (17,340  (3,810  (36,120

Finally granted

          (3,590,836  (180      (3,591,016

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

              4,278,410    4,460,390    8,738,800  

F-64TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


The performance shares, which are bought back by the Company on the market, are finally granted to their beneficiaries after a 3-year vesting period for the 2013 Plan and a 2-year vesting period for the previous plans, from the date of the grant. The final grant is subject to a continued employment condition and a performance condition. Moreover, the transfer of the performance shares finally granted will not be permitted until the end of a 2-year holding period from the date of the final grant.

20092013 Plan

For the 20092013 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior executives (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued employment condition and a performance condition. The performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.

The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary other(other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior executives) of more than 25,000 options, one third of100 shares, the options grantedshares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition mentioned before.

In addition, as part of the 2013 plan, the Board of Directors decided that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number of performance condition. Thisshares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the final number of optionsshares finally granted is based on the average

ROE of the Group as published by TOTAL. The average ROE is calculated based on the Group’sGroup according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 20092013, 2014 and 2010.2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and less than 16%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 7% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7% and less than 15%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

2012 Plan

For the 2012 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior executives (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued employment condition and a performance condition. The performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.

The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition mentioned before.

In addition, as part of the 2012 plan, the Board of Directors decided that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number of performance shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and less than 16%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-65


For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 7% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7% and less than 15%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

2011 Plan

For the 2011 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior executives (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued employment condition and a performance condition. The performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate:

 

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

 

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is moregreater than 7% and less than 18%; and

 

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is moregreater than or equal to 18%.

The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition mentioned before.

In addition, as part of the 2011 plan, the Board of Directors decided that, forsubject to a continuous employment condition, the number of performance shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer the number of share subscription options finally granted will be subject to two performance conditions:

 

For 50% of the share subscription optionsshares granted, the performance condition states that the number of optionsshares finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by TOTAL. The average ROE is calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

 

For 50% of the share subscription optionsshares granted, the performance condition states that the number of optionsshares finally granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group as published by TOTAL. The average ROACE is calculated based on the Group’sGroup according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 20092011 and 2010.2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

Due to the application of the performance condition, the acquisition rate was 100% for the 2011 Plan. As a reminder, the acquisition rates were 100% for the 2009 Plan.

B.TOTAL SHARE PURCHASE OPTION PLANS

    2001 Plan(a)  2002 Plan(b)  Total  Weighted
average exercise
price
 

Date of the shareholders’ meeting

   05/17/2001    05/17/2001    

Grant date(c)

   07/10/2001    07/09/2002    

Exercise price until May 23, 2006 included(d)

   42.05    39.58    

Exercise price since May 24, 2006(d)

   41.47    39.03    

Expiry date

   07/10/2009    07/09/2010          

Number of options(e)

     

Outstanding as of January 1, 2009

   4,691,426    6,450,857    11,142,283    40.06  

Awarded

                 

Cancelled

   (4,650,446  (7,920  (4,658,366)   41.47  

Exercised

   (40,980  (507,676  (548,656)   39.21  

Outstanding as of January 1, 2010

       5,935,261    5,935,261    39.03  

Awarded

                 

Cancelled(f)

       (4,671,989  (4,671,989)   39.03  

Exercised

       (1,263,272  (1,263,272)   39.03  

Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

                 

Awarded

                 

Cancelled

                 

Exercised

                 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

                 

(a)Options were exercisable, subject to a continued employment condition, after a 3.5-year vesting period from the date of the Board meeting awarding the options and expired 8 years after this date. The underlying shares may not be transferred during the 4-year period from the date of the grant. This plan expired on July 10, 2009.
(b)Options were exercisable, subject to a continued employment condition, after a 2-year vesting period from the date of the Board meeting awarding the options and expired 8 years after this date. The underlying shares may not be transferred during the 4-year period from the date of the grant. This plan expired on July 9, 2010.
(c)The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the options.
(d)Exercise price in euro. The exercise prices of TOTAL share purchase options of the plans at that date were multiplied by 0.25 to take into account the four-for-one stock split on May 18, 2006. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL share purchase options of these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006.
(e)The number of options awarded, outstanding, canceled or exercised before May 23, 2006 included, was multiplied by four to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the shareholders’ meeting on May 12, 2006.
(f)Out of the 4,671,989 options canceled in 2010, 4,671,145 options that were not exercised expired due to the expiry of the 2002 purchase option Plan on July 9, 2010.

C.EXCHANGE GUARANTEE GRANTED TO THE HOLDERS OF ELF AQUITAINE SHARE SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

Pursuant to the public exchange offer for Elf Aquitaine shares which was made in 1999, the Group made a commitment to guarantee the holders of Elf Aquitaine share subscription options, at the end of the period referred to in Article 163 bis C of the French Tax Code (CGI), and until the end of the period for the exercise of the options, the possibility to exchange their future Elf Aquitaine shares for TOTAL shares, on the basis of the exchange ratio of the offer (nineteen TOTAL shares for thirteen Elf Aquitaine shares).

In order to take into account the spin-off of S.D.A. (Société de Développement Arkema) by Elf Aquitaine, the spin-off of Arkema by TOTAL S.A. and the four-for-one TOTAL stock split, the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A., in accordance

with the terms of the share exchange undertaking, approved on March 14, 2006 to adjust the exchange ratio described above (see pages 24 and 25 of the “Prospectus for the purpose of listing Arkema shares on Euronext Paris in connection with the allocation of Arkema shares to TOTAL S.A. shareholders”). Following the approval by Elf Aquitaine shareholders’ meeting on May 10, 2006 of the spin-off of S.D.A. by Elf Aquitaine, the approval by TOTAL S.A. shareholders’ meeting on May 12, 2006 of the spin-off of Arkema by TOTAL S.A. and the four-for-one TOTAL stock split, the exchange ratio was adjusted to six TOTAL shares for one Elf Aquitaine share on May 22, 2006.

This exchange guarantee expired on September 12, 2009, due to the expiry of the Elf Aquitaine share subscription option plan No. 2 of 1999. Subsequently, no Elf Aquitaine shares are covered by the exchange guarantee.

D.TOTAL PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANTS

   2005 Plan  2006 Plan  2007 Plan  2008 Plan  2009 Plan  2010 Plan  2011 Plan  Total 

Date of the shareholders’ meeting

  05/17/2005    05/17/2005    05/17/2005    05/16/2008    05/16/2008    05/16/2008    05/13/2011   

Grant date(a)

  07/19/2005    07/18/2006    07/17/2007    10/09/2008    09/15/2009    09/14/2010    09/14/2011   

Final grant date (end of the vesting period)

  07/20/2007    07/19/2008    07/18/2009    10/10/2010    09/16/2011    09/15/2012    09/15/2013   

Transfer possible from

  07/20/2009    07/19/2010    07/18/2011    10/10/2012    09/16/2013    09/15/2014    09/15/2015      

Number of performance shares

        

Outstanding as of January 1, 2009

          2,333,217    2,772,748       5,105,965  

Awarded

                  2,972,018      2,972,018  

Canceled

  1,928    2,922    (12,418  (9,672  (5,982    (23,222) 

Finally granted(b)(c)

  (1,928  (2,922  (2,320,799  (600        (2,326,249) 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2010

              2,762,476    2,966,036      5,728,512  

Awarded

                      3,010,011     3,010,011  

Canceled(d)

  1,024    3,034    552    (1,113,462  (9,796  (8,738   (1,127,386) 

Finally granted(b)(c)

  (1,024  (3,034  (552  (1,649,014  (1,904  (636   (1,656,164) 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

                  2,954,336    3,000,637     5,954,973  

Awarded

                          3,649,770    3,649,770  

Canceled

  800    700    792    356    (26,214  (10,750  (19,579  (53,895) 

Finally granted(b)(c)(e)

  (800  (700  (792  (356  (2,928,122  (1,836      (2,932,606) 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

                      2,988,051    3,630,191    6,618,242  

(a)The grant date is the date of the Board of Directors meeting that awarded the shares, except for the shares awarded by the Board of Directors at their meeting of September 9, 2008, and granted on October 9, 2008.
(b)Performance shares finally granted following the death of their beneficiaries.
(c)Including performance shares finally granted for which the entitlement right had been canceled erroneously.
(d)Out of the 1,113,462 canceled rights to the grant share under the 2008 Plan, 1,094,914 entitlement rights were canceled due to the performance condition. The acquisition rate for the 2008 Plan was 60%.
(e)The acquisition rate for the 2009 Plan was 100%.

The performance shares, which are bought back by the Company on the market, are finally granted to their beneficiaries after a 2-year vesting period from the date of the grant. The final grant is subject to a continued employment condition and a performance condition. Moreover, the transfer of the performance shares finally granted will not be permitted until the end of a 2-year mandatory holding period from the date of the final grant.

2011 Plan

For the 2011 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that, for each senior executive (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the shares will be finally granted subject to a performance condition. This condition is based on the average ROE as published by the Group and calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 18%.

The Board of Directors decided also that, for each for each beneficiary (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition mentioned before.

In addition, as part of the 2011 plan, the Board of Directors decided that the number of performance share finally granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:

For 50% of the share granted, the performance condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.

For 50% of the share granted, the performance condition states that the number of shares finally

granted is based on the average ROACE of the Group. The average ROACE is calculated by the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.

2010 Planplans.

For the 2010 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that, for each beneficiary of more than 100 shares, half of the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to a performance condition. This condition is based on the average ROE calculated by the Group based on TOTAL’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 18%.

2009 Plan

For the 2009 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that, for each beneficiary of more than 100 shares, half of the shares in excess of this number will be finally granted subject to a performance condition. This condition states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average ROE as published by the Group and calculated based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The acquisition rate:

is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;

varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and

is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 18%.

Due to the application of the performance condition, the acquisition rate was 100% for the 2009 Plan.

 

E.C. GLOBAL FREE TOTAL SHARE PLAN

The Board of Directors approved at its meeting on May 21, 2010, the implementation and conditions of a global free share plan intended for the Group employees.Group’s employees (employees of Total S.A. or companies in which Total S.A. holds directly or indirectly an interest of more than 50%). On June 30, 2010, entitlement rights to 25twenty-five free shares were granted to every employee.

The final grant is subject to a continued employment condition during the plan’s vesting period. The sharesDepending on the country in which the companies of the Group are not subject tolocated, the acquisition period is either two years followed by a conservation period of two years (for the countries with a 2+2 structure), or four years without any performance condition. conservation period (for the countries with a 4+0 structure).

Following the vesting period, the shares awarded will be new shares.shares, issued from an increase of capital of TOTAL S.A., by incorporation of paid-in surplus or retained earnings.

 

    2010 Plan
(2+2)
  2010 Plan
(4+0)
  Total 

Date of the shareholders’ meeting

   05/16/2008    05/16/2008   

Date of the award(a)

   06/30/2010    06/30/2010   

Date of the final award

   07/01/2012    07/01/2014   

Transfer authorized as from

   07/01/2014    07/01/2014      

Number of free shares

    

Outstanding as of January 1, 2010

    

Notified

   1,508,850    1,070,650    2,579,500  

Cancelled

   (125  (75  (200) 

Finally granted(b)

   (75      (75) 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

   1,508,650    1,070,575    2,579,225  

Notified

             

Cancelled

   (29,175  (54,625  (83,800) 

Finally granted(b)

   (475  (425  (900) 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

   1,479,000    1,015,525    2,494,525  
F-66TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer acknowledged on July 2, 2012, the issuance and the award of 1,366,950 shares to the beneficiaries designated at the end of the 2-year acquisition period.

    2010 Plan
(2+2)
  2010 Plan
(4+0)
  Total 

Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting

   05/16/2008    05/16/2008   

Date of the award(a)

   06/30/2010    06/30/2010   

Date of the final award

   07/01/2012    07/01/2014   

Transfer authorized as from

   07/01/2014    07/01/2014      

Number of free shares

    

Outstanding as of January 1, 2011

   1,508,650    1,070,575    2,579,225  

Notified

             

Canceled

   (29,175  (54,625  (83,800

Finally granted

   (475  (425  (900

Outstanding as of January 1, 2012

   1,479,000    1,015,525    2,494,525  

Notified

             

Canceled

   (111,725  (40,275  (152,000

Finally granted(b)

   (1,367,275  (350  (1,367,625

Outstanding as of January 1, 2013

       974,900    974,900  

Notified

             

Canceled

   100    (101,150  (101,050

Finally granted

   (100  (275  (375

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

       873,475    873,475  

 

(a)The June 30, 2010, grant was decided by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010.
(b)Final grant followingof 1,366,950 shares to the death or disabilitydesignated beneficiaries at the end of the beneficiary of the shares.acquisition period.

F.D. SUNPOWER PLANS

SunPower has three stock incentive plans: the 1996 Stock Plan (“1996 Plan”), the SecondThird Amended and Restated 2005 SunPower Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”) and the PowerLight Corporation Common Stock Option and Common Stock Purchase Plan (“PowerLight Plan”). The PowerLight Plan was assumed by SunPower by way of the acquisition of PowerLight in fiscal 2007. Under the terms of all three plans, SunPower may issue incentive or non-statutory stock options or stock purchase rights to directors, employees and consultants to purchase common stock. The 2005 Plan was adopted by SunPower’s Board of Directors in August 2005, and was approved by shareholders in November 2005. The 2005 Plan replaced the 1996 Plan and allows not only for the grant of options, but also for the grant of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock grants, restricted stock units and other equity rights. The 2005 Plan also allows for tax withholding obligations related to stock option exercises or restricted stock awards to be satisfied through the retention of shares otherwise released upon vesting. The PowerLight Plan was adopted by PowerLight’s Board of Directors in October 2000.

In May 2008, SunPower’s stockholders approved an automatic annual increase available for grant under the 2005 Plan, beginning in fiscal 2009. The automatic annual increase is equal to the lower of three percent of the outstanding shares of all classes of SunPower’s common stock measured on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, 6.0 million shares, or such other

number of shares as determined by SunPower’s Board of

Directors. As of January 1, 2012, approximately 3.3 millionSubsequent to the automatic annual increase effective December 30, 2013, shares were available for grant under the 2005 Plan.will increase to approximately 7.6 million. No new awards are being granted under the 1996 Plan or the PowerLight Plan.

Incentive stock options may be granted at no less than the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. Non-statutory stock options and stock purchase rights may be granted at no less than 85% of the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant. The options and rights become exercisable when and as determined by SunPower’s Board of Directors, although these terms generally do not exceed ten years for stock options. Under the 1996 and 2005 Plans, the options typically vest over five years with a one-year cliff and monthly vesting thereafter. Under the PowerLight Plan, the options typically vest over five years with yearly cliff vesting. Under the 2005 Plan, the restricted stock grants and restricted stock units typically vest in three equal installments annually over three years.

The majority of shares issued are net of the minimum statutory withholding requirements that SunPower pays on behalf of its employees. During fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, the six months ended January 1, 2012 SunPowerCompany withheld 1,329,140 shares, 905,953 shares, and 221,262 shares, respectively, to satisfy the employees’ tax obligations. SunPower pays such withholding requirements in cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. Shares withheld are treated as common stock repurchases for accounting and disclosure purposes and reduce the number of shares outstanding upon vesting.

 

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-67


The following table summarizes SunPower’s stock option activities:

 

  Outstanding Stock Options   Outstanding Stock Options 

  Shares
(in thousands)
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
(in dollars)
   Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands
dollars)
   Shares (in
thousands)
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

Per Share
(in dollars)
   Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands
dollars)
 

Outstanding as of July 3, 2011

   519    25.39         519    25.39      
  

 

  

 

     

Exercised

   (29  3.93         (29  3.93      

Forfeited

   (6  31.29         (6  31.29      
  

 

 

       

 

  

 

     

Outstanding as of January 1, 2012

   484    26.62     4.71     480     484    26.62     4.71     480  
  

 

 

       

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exercisable as of January 1, 2012

   441    24.52     4.53     480     441    24.52     4.53     480  

Expected to vest after January 1, 2012

   40    48.08     6.64          40    48.08     6.64       
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2012

   484    26.62      
  

 

  

 

     

Exercised

   (20  2.59      

Forfeited

   (70  24.17      
  

 

  

 

     

Outstanding as of December 30, 2012

   394    28.27     3.51     310  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exercisable as of December 30, 2012

   394    28.27     3.51     310  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2013

   394    28.27      
  

 

  

 

     

Exercised

   (48  3.24      

Forfeited

   (26  42.25      
  

 

  

 

     

Outstanding as of December 29, 2013

   320    30.87     2.78     3,269  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exercisable as of December 29, 2013

   320    30.87     2.78     3,269  

 

The intrinsic value of options exercised in the six months ended January 1,2013, 2012, wasand 2011 were $0.8 million, $0.1 million, and $0.3 million.million, respectively. There were no stock options granted in 2013, 2012, and in the six months ended January 1, 2012.second half of 2011.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the

SunPower’s closing stock price of $6.23$28.91 at December 30, 2011,29, 2013, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The total number of in-the-money options exercisable was 0.10.2 million shares as of January 1, 2012.December 29, 2013.

 

The following table summarizes SunPower’s non-vested stock options and restricted stock activities thereafter:

 

  Stock Options   Restricted Stock Awards and Units   Stock Options   Restricted Stock Awards and Units 

  Shares
(in thousands)
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
(in dollars)
   Shares
(in thousands)
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share
(in dollars)
(1)
   Shares (in
thousands)
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

Per Share
(in dollars)
   Shares (in
thousands)
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share (in
dollars)
(a)
 

Outstanding as of July 3, 2011

   67    41.34     7,198    16.03     67    41.34     7,198    16.03  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Granted

            2,336    6.91              2,336    6.91  

Vested(2)

   (19  28.73     (691  18.96  

Vested(b)

   (19  28.73     (691  18.96  

Forfeited

   (5  31.29     (1,473  14.10     (5  31.29     (1,473  14.10  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

   43    48.33     7,370    13.25     43    48.33     7,370    13.25  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Granted

            5,638    5.93  

Vested(b)

   (30  57.79     (2,845  13.94  

Forfeited

   (13  24.72     (1,587  11.52  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2012

            8,576    8.53  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Granted

            5,607    15.88  

Vested(b)

            (3,583  9.48  

Forfeited

            (1,008  10.10  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

            9,592    12.26  

 

(1)(a)

The Company estimates the fair value of the restricted stock unit awards as the stock price on the grant date.

(2)(b)

Restricted stock awards and units vested include shares withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.

F-68TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


G.E. SHARE-BASED PAYMENT EXPENSE

Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2013 amounts to216 million and is broken down as follows:

3 million for TOTAL share subscription plans;

128 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans;

74 million for SunPower plans; and

11 million for the capital increase reserved for employees (see Note 17).

Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2012 amounted to148 million and was broken down as follows:

13 million for TOTAL share subscription plans;

133 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans; and

2 million for SunPower plans.

Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2011 amountsamounted to178 million and iswas broken down as follows:

 

27 million for TOTAL share subscription plans;

 

134 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans; and

 

17 million for SunPower plans.

Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2010 amounted to140 million and was broken down as follows:

31 million for TOTAL share subscription plans; and

109 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans.

Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2009 amounted to106 million and was broken down as follows:

38 million for TOTAL share subscription plans; and

68 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans.

The fair value of the options granted in 2011 2010 and 2009 has been measured according to the Black-Scholes method and based on the following assumptions:

 

For the year ended December 31,  2011   2010   2009  2013 2012 2011 

Risk free interest rate (%)(a)

   2.0     2.1     2.9            2.0  

Expected dividends (%)(b)

   5.6     5.9     4.8            5.6  

Expected volatility (%)(c)

   27.5     25.0     31.0            27.5  

Vesting period (years)

   2     2     2            2  

Exercice period (years)

   8     8     8  

Exercise period (years)

          8  

Fair value of the granted options
( per option)

   4.4     5.8     8.4            4.4  

 

(a)Zero coupon Euro swap rate at 6 years.
(b)The expected dividends are based on the price of TOTAL share derivatives traded on the markets.
(c)The expected volatility is based on the implied volatility of TOTAL share options and of share indices options traded on the markets.

At the shareholders’ meeting held on May 21, 2010, the shareholders delegated to the Board of Directors the authority to increase theIn 2013 and 2012 no new TOTAL share capital of the Company in

one or more transactions and within a maximum period of 26 months from the date of the meeting, by an amount not exceeding 1.5% of the share capital outstanding on the date of the meeting of the Board of Directors at which a decision to proceed with an issuance is made reserving subscriptions for such issuance to the Group employees participating in a company savings plan. It is being specified that the amount of any such capital increase reserved for Group employeessubscription option plan was counted against the aggregate maximum nominal amount of share capital increases authorized by the shareholders’ meeting held on May 21, 2010 for issuing new ordinary shares or other securities granting immediate or future access to the Company’s share capital with preferential subscription rights (2.5 billion in nominal value).

Pursuant to this delegation of authorization, the Board of Directors, during its October 28, 2010 meeting, implemented a capital increase reserved for employees within the limit of 12 million shares, with dividend rights as of the January 1, 2010 and delegated all power to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to determine the opening and closing of subscription period and the subscription price.

On March 14, 2011, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer decided that the subscription period would be set from March 16, 2011 to April 1, 2011 and acknowledged that the subscription price per ordinary share would be set at34.80. During this capital increase, 8,902,717 TOTAL shares were subscribed and created on April 28, 2011.decided.

The cost of capital increases reserved for employees is reduced to take into account the non-transferabilitynon transferability of the shares that could be subscribed by the employees over a period of five years. The valuation method of non-transferabilitynon transferability of the shares is based on a strategy cost in two steps consisting, first, in a five years forward sale of the non-transferablenontransferable shares, and second, in purchasing the

same number of shares in cash with a loan financing reimbursable “in fine”. During the year 2011, the main

assumptions used for the valuation of the cost of capital increase reserved for employees were the following:

 

For the year ended December 31,  2011 

Date of the Board of Directors meeting that decided the issue

   October 28, 2010  

Subscription price ()

   34.80  

Share price at the reference date ()(a)

   41.60  

Number of shares (in millions)

   8.90  

Risk free interest rate (%)(b)

   2.82  

EmployeesEmployees’ loan financing rate (%)(c)

   7.23  

Non transferability cost (% of the reference’s share price)

   17.6  

 

(a)Share price at the date which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer decided the subscription period.
(b)Zero coupon Euro swap rate at 5 years.
(c)The employeesemployees’ loan financing rate is based on a 5-year5 year consumer’s credit rate.

Due to the fact that the non-transferabilitynon transferability cost iswas higher than the discount, no cost has been accounted in 2011.

The Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012 delegated to the Board of Directors, in its seventeenth resolution, the authority to carry out in one or more occasions within a maximum period of twenty-six months, a capital increase reserved for employees belonging to an employee savings plan.

This same Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012 also delegated to the Board of Directors the powers necessary to accomplish in one or more occasions within a maximum period of eighteen months, a capital increase with the objective of providing employees with their registered office located outside France with benefits comparable to those granted to the employees included in the seventeenth resolution of the Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012.

Pursuant to these delegations, the Board of Directors, during its September 18, 2012 meeting, decided to proceed with a capital increase reserved for employees that included a classic offer and a leveraged offer depending on the employees’ choice, within the limit of 18 million shares with dividend rights as of January 1, 2012. This capital increase resulted in the subscription of 10,802,215 shares with a par value of2.5 at a unit price of30.70. The issuance of the shares was acknowledged on April 25, 2013.

The cost of the capital increase reserved for employees consists of the cost related to the discount on all the shares subscribed using both the classic and the leveraged schemes, and the opportunity gain for the shares subscribed using the leveraged scheme. This

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-69


opportunity gain corresponds to the benefit of subscribing to the leveraged offer, rather than reproducing the same economic profile through the purchase of options in the market for individual investors.

The global cost is reduced to take into account the non transferability of the shares that could be subscribed by the employees over a period of five years. The valuation method of non transferability of the shares is based on a strategy cost in two steps consisting, first, in a five years forward sale of the nontransferable shares, and second, in purchasing the same number of shares in cash with a loan financing reimbursable “in fine”. During the year 2013, the main assumptions used for the valuation of the cost of the capital increase reserved for employees were the following:

For the year ended December 31,2013

Date of the Board of Directors meeting that decided the issue

September 18, 2012

Subscription price ()(a)

30.70

Share price at the reference date ()(b)

39.57

Number of shares (in millions)

10.80

Risk free interest rate (%)(c)

0.88

Employees’ loan financing rate (%)(d)

6.97

Non transferability cost (% of the reference’s share price)

22.1

(a)Average of the closing TOTAL share prices during the twenty trading days prior to March 14, 2013, date on which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer set the subscription period, after deduction of a 20% discount.
(b)Share price on March 14, 2013, date on which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer set the subscription period.
(c)Zero coupon Euro swap rate at 5 years.
(d)The employees’ loan financing rate is based on a 5 year consumer’s credit rate.

A cost of10.6 million related to the capital increase reserved for employees has been accounted to the fiscal year 2011.2013.

26)PAYROLL AND STAFF

 

For the year ended
December 31,
  2011   2010   2009   2013   2012   2011 

Personnel expenses (M)

      

Personnel expenses (M€)

      

Wages and salaries (including social charges)

   6,579     6,246     6,177     7,096     7,135     6,579  

Group employees

            

France

            

• Management

   11,123     10,852     10,906     11,189     11,347     11,123  

• Other

   23,914     24,317     25,501     22,010     23,656     23,914  

International

            

• Management

   15,713     15,146     15,243     17,338     16,307     15,713  

• Other

   45,354     42,540     44,737     48,262     45,816     45,354  

Total

   96,104     92,855     96,387     98,799     97,126     96,104  

The number of employees includes only employees of fully consolidated subsidiaries.

The increase in the number of employees between December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is mainly explained by the acquisition of SunPower, partially compensated by the sale of the photocure and coatings resins businesses (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

27)STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

A) CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

The following table gives additional information on cash paid or received in the cash flow from operating activities:

 

For the year ended
December 31, (M)
  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended
December 31, (M€)
  2013 2012 2011 

Interests paid

   (679  (470  (678   (538  (694  (679

Interests received

   277    132    148     57    73    277  

Income tax paid(a)

   (12,061  (8,848  (7,027   (10,322  (13,067  (12,061

Dividends received

   2,133    1,722    1,456     2,107    2,419    2,133  

 

(a)These amounts include taxes paid in kind under production-sharing contracts in the exploration-production.Exploration & Production.

Changes in working capital are detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended
December 31, (M)
  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended
December 31, (M€)
  2013 2012 2011 

Inventories

   (1,845  (1,896  (4,217   812    372    (1,845

Accounts receivable

   (1,287  (2,712  (344   2,396    767    (1,287

Other current assets

   (2,409  911    1,505     (1,264  (226  (2,409

Accounts payable

   2,646    2,482    571     130    345    2,646  

Other creditors and accrued liabilities

   1,156    719    (831   (144  (174  1,156  

Net amount

   (1,739  (496  (3,316   1,930    1,084    (1,739

 

B) Cash flow used in financing activitiesCASH FLOW USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Changes in non-current financial debt are detailed in the following table under a net value due to the high number of multiple drawings:

 

For the year ended
December 31, (M)
  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended
December 31, (M€)
  2013 2012 2011 

Issuance of non-current debt

   4,234    3,995    6,309     8,448    5,539    4,234  

Repayment of non-current debt

   (165  (206  (787   (89  (260  (165

Net amount

   4,069    3,789    5,522     8,359    5,279    4,069  

 

C) Cash and cash equivalentsCASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents are detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended
December 31, (M)
  2011   2010   2009 
For the year ended
December 31, (M€)
  2013   2012   2011 

Cash

   4,715     4,679     2,448     9,351     6,202     4,715  

Cash equivalents

   9,310     9,810     9,214     5,296     9,267     9,310  

Total

   14,025     14,489     11,662     14,647     15,469     14,025  

Cash equivalents are mainly composed of deposits less than three months deposited in government institutions or deposit banks selected in accordance with strict criteria.

 

F-70TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


28)FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ANALYSIS PER INSTRUMENTS CLASS AND STRATEGY

The financial assets and liabilities disclosed in the balance sheet are detailed as follows:

 

 Financial instruments related to financing and trading activities Other financial
instruments
 Total Fair
value
  Financial instruments related to financing and operational activities Other financial
instruments
 Total Fair
value
 
 Amortized
cost
 Fair value            Amortized
cost
 Fair value           
As of December 31, 2011 (M) Assets / (Liabilities)    Available
for sale
(a)
 Held for
trading
 Financial
debt
(b)
 Hedging of
financial debt
 Cash flow
hedge
 Net investment
hedge and other
          
As of December 31, 2013 (M€) Assets / (Liabilities)    Available
for sale
(a)
 Held for
trading
 Financial
debt
(b)
 Hedging of
financial debt
 Cash flow
hedge
 Net investment
hedge and other
          

Equity affiliates: loans

  2,246           2,246    2,246    2,577                                2,577    2,577  

Other investments

   3,674          3,674    3,674        1,207                            1,207    1,207  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt

      1,971    5      1,976    1,976                    873    155            1,028    1,028  

Other non-current assets

  2,055           2,055    2,055    2,592                                2,592    2,592  

Accounts receivable, net(C)

         20,049    20,049    20,049                                16,984    16,984    16,984  

Other operating receivables

    1,074        6,393    7,467    7,467            927                    6,264    7,191    7,191  

Current financial assets

  146     159     383    12         700    700    117        78        340    1            536    536  

Cash and cash equivalents

  14,025    14,025    14,025                                14,647    14,647    14,647  

Total financial assets

  4,447    3,674    1,233        2,354    17        40,467    52,192    52,192    5,286    1,207    1,005        1,213    156        37,895    46,762    46,762  

Total non-financial assets

  111,857                                     126,729      

Total assets

  164,049                                     173,491      

Non-current financial debt

  (4,858    (17,551  (97  (49   (2  (22,557)   (23,247)   (5,064          (19,769  (236              (25,069  (25,670

Accounts payable(C)

         (22,086  (22,086)   (22,086)                               (21,958  (21,958  (21,958

Other operating liabilities

    (606      (4,835  (5,441)   (5,441)           (615          (19      (5,307  (5,941  (5,941

Current borrowings

  (6,158    (3,517      (9,675)   (9,675)   (4,279          (3,837                  (8,116  (8,116

Other current financial liabilities

  (87  (40  (14  (26  (167)   (167)           (44      (228  (4          (276  (276

Total financial liabilities

  (11,016      (693  (21,068  (137  (63  (26  (26,923  (59,926  (60,616  (9,343      (659  (23,606  (464  (23      (27,265  (61,360  (61,961

Total non-financial liabilities

  (104,123                                   (112,131    

Total liabilities

  (164,049                                   (173,491    

 

(a)Financial assets available for sale are measured at their fair value except for unlisted securities (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(b)The financial debt is adjusted to the hedged risks value (currency and interest rate) as part of hedge accounting (see Note 1 paragraph M(iii) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(c)The impact of offsetting on accounts receivable, net is €(2,508) million and + €2,508 million on accounts payable.

   Financial instruments related to financing and trading activities  Other financial
instruments
  Total  Fair
value
 
  Amortized
cost
      Fair value                     
As of December 31, 2010 (M) Assets / (Liabilities)     Available
for sale(a)
  Held for
trading
  Financial
debt(b)
  Hedging of
financial debt
  Cash flow
hedge
  Net investment
hedge and other
             

Equity affiliates: loans

  2,383           2,383    2,383  

Other investments

   4,590          4,590    4,590  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt

      1,814    56      1,870    1,870  

Other non-current assets

  1,596           1,596    1,596  

Accounts receivable, net

         18,159    18,159    18,159  

Other operating receivables

    499        3,908    4,407    4,407  

Current financial assets

  869     38     292     6     1,205    1,205  

Cash and cash equivalents

                              14,489    14,489    14,489  

Total financial assets

  4,848    4,590    537        2,106    56    6    36,556    48,699    48,699  

Total non-financial assets

                                  95,019      

Total assets

                                  143,718      

Non-current financial debt

  (3,186    (17,419  (178     (20,783  (21,172

Accounts payable

         (18,450  (18,450  (18,450

Other operating liabilities

    (559      (3,015  (3,574  (3,574

Current borrowings

  (5,916    (3,737      (9,653  (9,653

Other current financial liabilities

          (147      (12              (159  (159

Total financial liabilities

  (9,102      (706  (21,156  (190          (21,465  (52,619  (53,008

Total non-financial liabilities

                                  (91,099    

Total liabilities

                                  (143,718    

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-71


   Financial instruments related to financing and operational activities  Other financial
instruments
  Total  Fair
value
 
  Amortized
cost
  Fair value             
As of December 31, 2012 (M€) Assets / (Liabilities)     Available
for sale
(a)
  Held for
trading
  Financial
debt
(b)
  Hedging of
financial debt
  Cash flow
hedge
  Net investment
hedge and other
             

Equity affiliates: loans

  2,360                                2,360    2,360  

Other investments

      1,190                            1,190    1,190  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt

                  1,566    60            1,626    1,626  

Other non-current assets

  2,207                                2,207    2,207  

Accounts receivable, net(C)

                              19,206    19,206    19,206  

Other operating receivables

          681                    5,477    6,158    6,158  

Current financial assets

  1,093        38        430    1            1,562    1,562  

Cash and cash equivalents

                              15,469    15,469    15,469  

Total financial assets

  5,660    1,190    719        1,996    61        40,152    49,778    49,778  

Total non-financial assets

                                  121,446      

Total assets

                                  171,224      

Non-current financial debt

  (5,086          (17,177  (11              (22,274  (22,473

Accounts payable(C)

                              (21,648  (21,648  (21,648

Other operating liabilities

          (456          (10      (5,438  (5,904  (5,904

Current borrowings

  (6,787          (4,229                  (11,016  (11,016

Other current financial liabilities

          (88      (84  (4          (176  (176

Total financial liabilities

  (11,873      (544  (21,406  (95  (14      (27,086  (61,018  (61,217

Total non-financial liabilities

                                  (110,206    

Total liabilities

                                  (171,224    

 

(a)Financial assets available for sale are measured at their fair value except for unlisted securities (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(b)The financial debt is adjusted to the hedged risks value (currency and interest rate) as part of hedge accounting (see Note 1 paragraph M(iii) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(c)The impact of offsetting on accounts receivable, net is €(1,082) million and + €1,082 million on accounts payable.

   Financial instruments related to financing and trading activities  Other financial
instruments
  Total  Fair
value
 
  Amortized
cost
      Fair value                     
As of December 31, 2009 (M) Assets / (Liabilities)     Available
for sale(a)
  Held for
trading
  Financial
debt(b)
  Hedging of
financial debt
  Cash flow
hedge
  Net investment
hedge and other
             

Equity affiliates: loans

  2,367           2,367    2,367  

Other investments

   1,162          1,162    1,162  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt

      889    136      1,025    1,025  

Other non-current assets

  1,284           1,284    1,284  

Accounts receivable, net

         15,719    15,719    15,719  

Other operating receivables

    1,029        4,116    5,145    5,145  

Current financial assets

  55     53     197     6     311    311  

Cash and cash equivalents

                              11,662    11,662    11,662  

Total financial assets

  3,706    1,162    1,082        1,086    136    6    31,497    38,675    38,675  

Total non-financial assets

                                  89,078      

Total assets

                                  127,753      

Non-current financial debt

  (2,089    (17,107  (241     (19,437  (19,905

Accounts payable

         (15,383  (15,383  (15,383

Other operating liabilities

    (923      (3,783  (4,706  (4,706

Current borrowings

  (4,849    (2,145      (6,994  (6,994

Other current financial liabilities

          (25      (97      (1      (123  (123

Total financial liabilities

  (6,938      (948  (19,252  (338      (1  (19,166  (46,643  (47,111

Total non-financial liabilities

                                  (81,110    

Total liabilities

                                  (127,753    

F-72TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


    Financial instruments related to financing and trading activities  Other financial
instruments
  Total  Fair
value
 
   Amortized
cost
  Fair value       
As of December 31, 2011 (M€)
Assets / (Liabilities)
      Available
for sale (a)
   Held for
trading
  Financial
debt(b)
  Hedging of
financial debt
  Cash flow
hedge
  Net investment
hedge and other
             

Equity affiliates: loans

   2,246                                 2,246    2,246  

Other investments

       3,674                             3,674    3,674  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt

                    1,971    5            1,976    1,976  

Other non-current assets

   2,055                                 2,055    2,055  

Accounts receivable, net(C)

                                20,049    20,049    20,049  

Other operating receivables

            1,017                    6,450    7,467    7,467  

Current financial assets

   146         159        383    12            700    700  

Cash and cash equivalents

                                14,025    14,025    14,025  

Total financial assets

   4,447    3,674     1,176        2,354    17        40,524    52,192    52,192  

Total non-financial assets

                                    111,513      

Total assets

                                    163,705      

Non-current financial debt

   (4,858           (17,551  (97  (49      (2  (22,557  (23,247

Accounts payable(C)

                                (22,086  (22,086  (22,086

Other operating liabilities

            (548                  (4,893  (5,441  (5,441

Current borrowings

   (6,158        (3,517                  (9,675  (9,675

Other current financial liabilities

            (87      (40  (14  (26      (167  (167

Total financial liabilities

   (11,016       (635  (21,068  (137  (63  (26  (26,981  (59,926  (60,616

Total non-financial liabilities

                                    (103,779    

Total liabilities

                                    (163,705    

 

(a)Financial assets available for sale are measured at their fair value except for unlisted securities (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(b)The financial debt is adjusted to the hedged risks value (currency and interest rate) as part of hedge accounting (see Note 1 paragraph M(iii) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
(c)The impact of offsetting on accounts receivable, net is €(779) million and + €779 million on accounts payable.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-73


29)FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (EXCLUDING COMMODITY CONTRACTS)

 

A) IMPACT ON THE STATEMENT OF INCOME PER NATURE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Operating assets and liabilities

The impact on the statement of income is detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31,
(M)
  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31,
(M€)
  2013 2012 2011 

Assets available for sale (investments):

        

— dividend income on non-consolidated subsidiaries

   330    255    210     152    223    330  

— gains (losses) on disposal of assets

   103    60    6     112    516    103  

— other

   (29  (17  (18   (71  (60  (29

Loans and receivables

   (34  90    41     80    (20  (34

Impact on net operating income

   370    388    239     273    659    370  

The impact in the statement of income mainly includes:

 

Dividends and gains or losses on disposal of other investments classified as “Other investments”;

 

Financial gains and depreciation on loans related to equity affiliates, non-consolidated companies and on receivables reported in “Loans and receivables”.

Assets and liabilities from financing activities

The impact on the statement of income of financing assets and liabilities is detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31,
(M)
  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31,
(M€)
  2013 2012 2011 

Loans and receivables

   271    133    158     70    80    271  

Financing liabilities and associated hedging instruments

   (730  (469  (563   (677  (675  (730

Fair value hedge (ineffective portion)

   17    4    33     7    4    17  

Assets and liabilities held for trading

   2    (2  (26   (6  20    2  

Impact on the cost of net debt

   (440  (334  (398   (606  (571  (440

The impact on the statement of income mainly includes:

 

Financial income on cash, cash equivalents, and current financial assets (notably current deposits beyond three months) classified as “Loans and receivables”;

beyond three months) classified as “Loans and receivables”;

Financial expense of long term subsidiaries financing, associated hedging instruments (excluding ineffective portion of the hedge detailed below) and financial expense of short term financing classified as “Financing liabilities and associated hedging instruments”;

 

Ineffective portion of bond hedging; and

 

Financial income, financial expense and fair value of derivative instruments used for cash management purposes classified as “Assets and liabilities held for trading”.

Financial derivative instruments used for cash management purposes (interest rate and foreign exchange) are considered to be held for trading. Based on practical documentation issues, the Group did not elect to set up hedge accounting for such instruments. The impact on income of the derivatives is offset by the impact of loans and current liabilities they are related to. Therefore these transactions taken as a whole do not have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

B) IMPACT OF THE HEDGING STRATEGIES

Fair value hedge

The impact on the statement of income of the bond hedging instruments which is recorded in the item “Financial interest on debt” in the Consolidated Statement of Income is detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31,
(M)
  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31,
(M€)
 2013 2012 2011 

Revaluation at market value of bonds

   (301  (1,164  (183  1,075    321    (301

Swap hedging of bonds

   318    1,168    216    (1,068  (317  318  

Ineffective portion of the fair value hedge

   17    4    33    7    4    17  

The ineffective portion is not representative of the Group’s performance considering the Group’s objective to hold swaps to maturity. The current portion of the swaps valuation is not subject to active management.

 

F-74TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Net investment hedge

These instruments are recorded directly in shareholders’ equity under “Currency translation adjustments”. The variations of the period are detailed in the table below:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  As of January 1, Variations Disposals   As of December 31, 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  As of January 1, Variations Disposals   As of December 31, 

2013

   (291  25         (266

2012

   (104  (187       (291

2011

   (243  139         (104   (243  139         (104

2010

   25    (268       (243

2009

   124    (99       25  

As for December 31, 2012, the Group had no open forward hedging instruments as of December 31, 2011, the2013. The fair value of the open forward instruments amounts towas(26) million compared to6 million in 2010 and5 million in 2009.2011.

Cash flow hedge

The impact on the statement of income and on equity of the hedging instruments qualified as cash flow hedges is detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013   2012   2011 

Profit (Loss) recorded in equity during the period

   (84  (80  128     117     65     (84

Recycled amount from equity to the income statement during the period

   (47  (115  221     65     87     (47

As of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012, and 2009,2011, the ineffective portion of these financial instruments is equal to zero.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-75


C) MATURITY OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The maturity of the notional amounts of derivative instruments, excluding the commodity contracts, is detailed in the following table:

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)

Assets / (Liabilities)

  Fair
value
  Notional value(a) 
 Total   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017
and
after
 
     Notional value(a) 

As of December 31, 2013 (M€)

Assets / (Liabilities)

  Fair
value
  Total   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019
and
after
 

Fair value hedge

                              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (97  1,478                 (236  7,480                                

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,971    15,653                       873    12,156                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   1,874    17,131       4,204     4,215     3,380     1,661     3,671     637    19,636          3,410     2,606     2,970     3,749     6,901  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

   (40  642                 (228  1,366                                

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

   383    2,349                       340    2,793                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

   343    2,991     2,991               112    4,159     4,159                           

Cash flow hedge

                              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (49  967                                                     

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   5    749                       155    1,610                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   (44  1,716                           1,716     155    1,610                              1,610  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

   (14  582                 (4  120                                

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

   12    908                       1    96                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

   (2  1,490     1,490               (3  216     196     20                      

Swaps hedging investments (liabilities)

   (19  143                                

Swaps hedging investments (assets)

                                       

Total swaps hedging investments (assets and liabilities)

   (19  143     132     11                      

Net investment hedge

                              

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

                                                            

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

   (26  881                                                           

Total swaps hedging net investments

   (26  881     881                                                   

Held for trading

                              

Other interest rate swaps (assets)

   1    3,605                 2    4,093                                

Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)

   (2  14,679                       (3  11,316                                

Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)

   (1  18,284     18,284                              (1  15,409     15,127     86     83     62     51       

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

   158    6,984                 76    4,768                                

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

   (85  4,453                       (41  4,437                                

Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets and liabilities)

   73    11,437     11,176     80     58     36     31     56     35    9,205     8,945     194     42     10     14       

 

(a)These amounts set the levels of notional commitment and are not indicative of a contingent gain or loss.

As of December 31, 2010 (M)

Assets / (Liabilities)

      Notional value(a) 
  Fair
value
  Total   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016
and
after
 

Fair value hedge

               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (178  2,244              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,814    13,939                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   1,636    16,183       2,967     3,461     2,421     3,328     4,006  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

   (12  592              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

   292    2,815                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

   280    3,407     3,407            

Cash flow hedge

               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

                     

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   56    1,957                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   56    1,957       295           1,662  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

                                       

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

                        

Net investment hedge

               

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

   6    381              

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

                                       

Total swaps hedging net investments

   6    381     381            

Held for trading

               

Other interest rate swaps (assets)

   1    6,463              

Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)

   (3  11,395                                

Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)

   (2  17,858     17,667     189               2       

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

   37    1,532              

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

   (144  6,757                                

Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets and liabilities)

   (107  8,289     8,102          25     49     31     82  

F-76TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


        Notional value(a) 

As of December 31, 2012 (M€)

Assets / (Liabilities)

  Fair
value
  Total   2013   2014   2015  2016   2017   2018
and
after
 

Fair value hedge

              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (11  1,737                               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,566    15,431                               

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   1,555    17,168          4,205     3,537    2,098     3,075     4,253  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

   (84  591                               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

   430    3,614                               

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

   346    4,205     4,205                          

Cash flow hedge

              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   60    1,683                               

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   60    1,683                             1,683  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

   (4  148                               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

   1    19                               

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

   (3  167     167                          

Swaps hedging investments (liabilities)

   (10  518                               

Swaps hedging investments (assets)

                                      

Total swaps hedging investments (assets and liabilities)

   (10  518     365     141     12                

Net investment hedge

��             

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

                                      

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

                                      

Total swaps hedging net investments

                                      

Held for trading

              

Other interest rate swaps (assets)

   2    11,041                               

Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)

   (2  9,344                               

Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)

       20,385     19,962     133     88    85     64     53  

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

   36    4,768                               

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

   (86  12,224                               

Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets and liabilities)

   (50  16,992     16,776     186     (15  16     16     13  

 

(a)These amounts set the levels of notional commitment and are not indicative of a contingent gain or loss.

As of December 31, 2009 (M)

Assets / (Liabilities)

      Notional value(a) 
  Fair
value
  Total   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015
and
after
 

Fair value hedge

               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (241  4,615              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   889    11,076                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   648    15,691          3,345     2,914     3,450     1,884     4,098  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

   (97  912              

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

   197    1,084                                

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

   100    1,996     1,996            

Cash flow hedge

               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   136    1,837               295               1,542  

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   136    1,837         295         1,542  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

               

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

                                       

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

               

Net investment hedge

               

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

   6    701              

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

   (1  224                                

Total swaps hedging net investments

   5    925     925            

Held for trading

               

Other interest rate swaps (assets)

    1,459              

Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)

   (1  10,865                                

Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)

   (1  12,324     12,208     114           2  

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

   53    4,017              

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

   (24  3,456                                

Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets and liabilities)

   29    7,473     7,224          52     50     47     100  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-77


As of December 31, 2011 (M€)

Assets / (Liabilities)

     Notional value(a) 
 Fair
value
  Total  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017
and
after
 

Fair value hedge

        

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

  (97  1,478    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

  1,971    15,653    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

  1,874    17,131    —      4,204    4,215    3,380    1,661    3,671  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

  (40  642    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

  383    2,349    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

  343    2,991    2,991    —      —      —      —      —    

Cash flow hedge

        

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

  (49  967    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

  5    749    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

  (44  1,716     —      —      —      —      1,716  

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)

  (14  582    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)

  12    908    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets and liabilities)

  (2  1,490    1,490    —      —      —      —      —    

Net investment hedge

        

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

  (26  881    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Total swaps hedging net investments

  (26  881    881    —      —      —      —      —    

Held for trading

        

Other interest rate swaps (assets)

  1    3,605    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)

  (2  14,679    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)

  (1  18,284    18,284    —      —      —      —      —    

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)

  158    6,984    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)

  (85  4,453    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets and liabilities)

  73    11,437    11,176    80    58    36    31    56  

 

(a)These amounts set the levels of notional commitment and are not indicative of a contingent gain or loss.

 

D) FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

The fair value hierarchy for financial instruments excluding commodity contracts is as follows:

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)  Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
(level 1)
   Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
 Prices based on non-
observable data
(level 3)
   Total 
As of December 31, 2013 (M€ )  

Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets

(level 1)

   Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
   

Prices based on
non observable
data

(level 3)

   Total 

Fair value hedge instruments

        2,217         2,217          749          749  

Cash flow hedge instruments

        (46       (46        133          133  

Net investment hedge instruments

        (26       (26                    

Assets and liabilities held for trading

        72         72  

Assets and liablities held for trading

        34          34  

Assets available for sale

   2,575              2,575     116               116  

Total

   2,575     2,217         4,792     116     916          1,032  

As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
(level 1)
   Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
  Prices based on
non-observable
data
(level 3)
   Total 

Fair value hedge instruments

        1,916         1,916  

Cash flow hedge instruments

        56         56  

Net investment hedge instruments

        6         6  

Assets and liabilities held for trading

        (109       (109

Assets available for sale

   3,631              3,631  

Total

   3,631     1,869         5,500  

 

As of December 31, 2009 (M)  Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
(level 1)
   Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
   Prices based on
non-observable
data
(level 3)
   Total 

Fair value hedge instruments

        748          748  

Cash flow hedge instruments

        136          136  

Net investment hedge instruments

        5          5  

Assets and liabilities held for trading

        28          28  

Assets available for sale

   232               232  

Total

   232     917          1,149  
F-78TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


As of December 31, 2012 (M€ )  

Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets

(level 1)

   Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
  

Prices based on
non observable
data

(level 3)

   Total 

Fair value hedge instruments

        1,901         1,901  

Cash flow hedge instruments

        47         47  

Net investment hedge instruments

                   

Assets and liablities held for trading

        (50       (50

Assets available for sale

   91              91  

Total

   91     1,898         1,989  

As of December 31, 2011 (M€ )  

Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets

(level 1)

   Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
  

Prices based on
non observable
data

(level 3)

   Total 

Fair value hedge instruments

        2,217         2,217  

Cash flow hedge instruments

        (46       (46

Net investment hedge instruments

        (26       (26

Assets and liablities held for trading

        72         72  

Assets available for sale

   2,575              2,575  

Total

   2,575     2,217         4,792  

The description of each fair value level is presented in Note 1 paragraph M(v) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-79


30)FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS RELATED TO COMMODITY CONTRACTS

Financial instruments related to oil, gas and power activities as well as related currency derivatives are recorded at fair value under “Other current assets” or “Other creditors and accrued liabilities” depending on whether they are assets or liabilities.

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)        

Assets / (Liabilities)

  Carrying amount Fair value(b) 

As of December 31, 2013 (M€)

Assets / (Liabilities)

 Gross value
before
offsetting –
assets
 Gross value
before
offsetting –
liabilities
 Amounts
offset –  assets
(c)
 Amounts
offset –  liabilities
(c)
 

Net balance
sheet value
presented –

assets

 Net balance
sheet value
presented –
liabilities
 Other
amounts not
offset
 Net carrying
amount
 Fair value(b) 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

            

Petroleum products and crude oil swaps

   3    3    68    (148  (57  57    11    (91      (80  (80)  

Freight rate swaps

                                             

Forwards(a)

   (16  (16  42    (41  (6  6    36    (35      1    1  

Options

   (4  (4  144    (170  (45  45    99    (125      (26  (26)  

Futures

   (14  (14  5    (1          5    (1      4    4  

Options on futures

   (6  (6  49    (41  (41  41    8            8    8  

Other / Collateral

                          70    70    70  

Total crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates

   (37  (37  308    (401  (149  149    159    (252  70    (23  (23)  

Gas & Power activities

            

Swaps

   57    57    50    (15  (8  8    42    (7      35    35  

Forwards(a)

   452    452    763    (384  (29  29    734    (355      379    379  

Options

   (3  (3      (9  (8  8    (8  (1      (9  (9)  

Futures

                                             

Other / Collateral

                          11    11    11  

Total Gas & Power

   506    506    813    (408  (45  45    768    (363  11    416    416  

Total

   469    469    1,121    (809  (194  194    927    (615  81    393    393  

Total of fair value non-recognized in the balance sheet

      

Total of fair value non recognized in the balance sheet

            

 

(a)

Forwards: contracts resulting in physical delivery are accounted for as derivative commodity contracts and included in the amounts shown.

(b)

When the fair value of derivatives listed on an organized exchange market (futures, options on futures and swaps) is offset with the margin call received or paid in the balance sheet, this fair value is set to zero.

(c)

Amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32.

As of December 31, 2010 (M)

Assets / (Liabilities)

  Carrying amount  Fair value(b) 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

   

Petroleum products and crude oil swaps

   (2  (2

Freight rate swaps

         

Forwards(a)

   5    5  

Options

   51    51  

Futures

   (12  (12

Options on futures

   (4  (4

Total crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates

   38    38  

Gas & Power activities

   

Swaps

   (1  (1

Forwards(a)

   (102  (102

Options

   5    5  

Futures

         

Total Gas & Power

   (98  (98

Total

   (60  (60

Total of fair value non-recognized in the balance sheet

      

F-80TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


As of December 31, 2012 (M€)

Assets / (Liabilities)

 Gross value
before
offsetting –
assets
  Gross value
before
offsetting –
liabilities
  Amounts
offset – assets
(c)
  Amounts
offset – liabilities
(c)
  Net balance
sheet value
presented –
assets
  Net balance
sheet value
presented –
liabilities
  Other
amounts not
offset
  Net carrying
amount
  Fair value(b) 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

         

Petroleum products and crude oil swaps

  142    (168  (90  90    52    (78      (26  (26)  

Freight rate swaps

                                    

Forwards(a)

  7    (9  (3  3    4    (6      (2  (2)  

Options

  231    (249  (226  226    5    (23      (18  (18)  

Futures

      (6              (6      (6  (6)  

Options on futures

  64    (59  (59  59    5            5    5  

Other / Collateral

                          22    22    22  

Total crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates

  444    (491  (378  378    66    (113  22    (25  (25)  

Gas & Power activities

         

Swaps

  54    (71  (43  43    11    (28      (17  (17)  

Forwards(a)

  652    (361  (48  48    604    (313      291    291  

Options

  11    (13  (11  11        (2      (2  (2)  

Futures

                                    

Other / Collateral

                          31    31    31  

Total Gas & Power

  717    (445  (102  102    615    (343  31    303    303  

Total

  1,161    (936  (480  480    681    (456  53    278    278  

Total of fair value non recognized in the balance sheet

            

 

(a)

Forwards: contracts resulting in physical delivery are accounted for as derivative commodity contracts and included in the amounts shown.

(b)

When the fair value of derivatives listed on an organized exchange market (futures, options on futures and swaps) is offset with the margin call received or paid in the balance sheet, this fair value is set to zero.

(c)

Amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-81

As of December 31, 2009 (M)

Assets / (Liabilities)

  Carrying amount  Fair value(b) 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

   

Petroleum products and crude oil swaps

   (29  (29

Freight rate swaps

         

Forwards(a)

   (9  (9

Options

   21    21  

Futures

   (17  (17

Options on futures

   6    6  

Total crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates

   (28  (28

Gas & Power activities

   

Swaps

   52    52  

Forwards(a)

   78    78  

Options

   4    4  

Futures

         

Total Gas & Power

   134    134  

Total

   106    106  

Total of fair value non-recognized in the balance sheet

      

As of December 31, 2011 (M€)

Assets / (Liabilities)

 Gross value
before
offsetting –
assets
  Gross value
before
offsetting –
liabilities
  Amounts
offset –  assets
(c)
  Amounts
offset –  liabilities
(c)
  Net balance
sheet value
presented –
assets
  Net balance
sheet value
presented –
liabilities
  Other
amounts not
offset
  Net carrying
amount
  Fair value(b) 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

         

Petroleum products and crude oil swaps

  345    (342  (240  240    105    (102      3    3  

Freight rate swaps

                                    

Forwards(a)

  11    (27  (6  6    5    (21      (16  (16)  

Options

  313    (317  (297  297    16    (20      (4  (4)  

Futures

      (14              (14      (14  (14)  

Options on futures

  96    (102  (96  96        (6      (6  (6)  

Other / Collateral

                          (50  (50  (50)  

Total crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates

  765    (802  (639  639    126    (163  (50  (87  (87)  

Gas & Power activities

         

Swaps

  72    (15  (9  9    63    (6      57    57  

Forwards(a)

  949    (497  (121  121    828    (376      452    452  

Options

  15    (18  (15  15        (3      (3  (3)  

Futures

                                    

Other / Collateral

                          24    24    24  

Total Gas & Power

  1,036    (530  (145  145    891    (385  24    530    530  

Total

  1,801    (1,332  (784  784    1,017    (548  (26  443    443  

Total of fair value non recognized in the balance sheet

            

 

(a)

Forwards: contracts resulting in physical delivery are accounted for as derivative commodity contracts and included in the amounts shown.

(b)

When the fair value of derivatives listed on an organized exchange market (futures, options on futures and swaps) is offset with the margin call received or paid in the balance sheet, this fair value is set to zero.

(c)

Amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32.

F-82TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Most commitments on crude oil and refined products have a short term maturity (less than one year). The maturity of most Gas & Power energy derivatives is less than three years forward.

The changes in fair value of financial instruments related to commodity contracts are detailed as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  

Fair value

as of  January 1,

  

Impact on

income

   

Settled

contracts

  Other  

Fair value

as of  December 31,

 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

         ��            

2011

   38    1,572     (1,648  1    (37

2010

   (28  1,556     (1,488  (2  38  

2009

   39    1,713     (1,779  (1  (28

Gas & Power activities

                      

2011

   (98  899     (295  0    506  

2010

   134    410     (648  6    (98

2009

   592    327     (824  39    134  

For the year ended December 31, (M€)  

Fair value

as of January 1,

  Impact on
income
   Settled
contracts
  Other  

Fair value

as of December 31,

 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

                      

2013

   (47  1,706     (1,754  2    (93

2012

   (37  1,694     (1,705  1    (47

2011

   38    1,572     (1,648  1    (37

Gas & Power activities

                      

2013

   272    470     (282  (55  405  

2012

   506    588     (825  3    272  

2011

   (98  899     (295      506  

The fair value hierarchy for financial instruments related to commodity contracts is as follows:

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)  

Quoted prices

in active  markets for

identical

assets (level 1)

 

Prices based on

observable data

(level 2)

   

Prices based on

non-observable

data (level 3)

   Total 
As of December 31, 2013 (M€ ) Quoted prices
in active markets for
identical
assets (level 1)
 Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
 Prices based on
non observable
data (level 3)
 Total 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

   (38  1          (37  15    (108      (93

Gas & Power activities

   (44  550          506        405        405  

Total

   (82  551          469    15    297        312  

 

As of December 31, 2010 (M)  

Quoted prices

in active  markets for
identical

assets (level 1)

 

Prices based on

observable data

(level 2)

 

Prices based on

non-observable
data (level 3)

   Total 
As of December 31, 2012 (M€ ) Quoted prices
in active markets for
identical assets
(level 1)
 Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
 Prices based on
non observable
data (level 3)
 Total 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

   (10  48         38    5    (52      (47

Gas & Power activities

   50    (148       (98  (52  324        272  

Total

   40    (100       (60  (47  272        225  

 

As of December 31, 2009 (M)  

Quoted prices

in active  markets for

identical

assets (level 1)

 

Prices based on

observable data

(level 2)

 

Prices based on

non-observable

data (level 3)

   Total 
As of December 31, 2011 (M€ ) 

Quoted prices
in active markets for
identical

assets (level 1)

 Prices based on
observable data
(level 2)
 Prices based on
non observable
data (level 3)
 Total 

Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities

   (45  17         (28  (38  1        (37

Gas & Power activities

   140    (6       134    (44  550        506  

Total

   95    11         106    (82  551        469  

The description of each fair value level is presented in Note 1 paragraph M(v) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

31)FINANCIAL RISKS MANAGEMENT

Oil and gas market related risks

Due to the nature of its business, the Group has significant oil and gas trading activities as part of its day-to-day operations in order to optimize revenues from its oil and gas production and to obtain favorable pricing to supply its refineries.

In its international oil trading business, the Group follows a policy of not selling its future production. However, in connection with this trading business, the Group, like most other oil companies, uses energy derivative instruments to adjust its exposure to price fluctuations of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, power and coal. The Group also

uses freight rate derivative contracts in its shipping business to adjust its exposure to freight-rate fluctuations. To hedge against this risk, the Group uses various instruments such as futures, forwards, swaps and options on organisedorganized markets or over-the-counter markets. The list of the different derivatives held by the Group in these markets is detailed in Note 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Trading & Shipping division measures its market risk exposure,i.e. potential loss in fair values, on its crude oil, refined products and freight rates trading activities using a value-at-risk technique. This technique is based on an historical model and makes an assessment of the market risk arising from possible future changes in market values

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-83


over a 24-hour period. The calculation of the range of potential changes in fair values takes into account a

snapshot of the end-of-day exposures and the set of historical price movements for the last 400 business days for all instruments and maturities in the global trading activities. Options are systematically reevaluatedre-evaluated using appropriate models.

The potential movement in fair values corresponds to a 97.5% value-at-risk type confidence level. This means that the Group’s portfolio result is likely to exceed the value-at-risk loss measure once over 40 business days if the portfolio exposures were left unchanged.

Trading & Shipping :Shipping: value-at-risk with a 97.5% probability

 

As of December 31,
(M)
  High   Low   Average   Year end 

2011

   10.6     3.7     6.1     6.3  

2010

   23.1     3.4     8.9     3.8  

2009

   18.8     5.8     10.2     7.6  

As of

December 31, (M€)

  High   Low   Average   Year
end
 

2013

   9.9     3.5     6.2     7.1  

2012

   13.0     3.8     7.4     5.5  

2011

   10.6     3.7     6.1     6.3  

As part of its gas, power and coal trading activity, the Group also uses derivative instruments such as futures, forwards, swaps and options in both organisedorganized and over-the-counter markets. In general, the transactions are settled at maturity date through physical delivery. The Gas & Power division measures its market risk exposure,i.e. potential loss in fair values, on its trading business using a value-at-risk technique. This technique is based on an historical model and makes an assessment of the market risk arising from possible future changes in market values over a one-day period. The calculation of the range of potential changes in fair values takes into account a

snapshot of the end-of-day exposures and the set of historical price movements for the past two years for all instruments and maturities in the global trading business.

Gas & Power trading :trading: value-at-risk with a 97.5% probability

 

As of December 31,
(M)
  High   Low   Average   Year end 

2011

   21.0     12.7     16.0     17.6  

2010

   13.9     2.7     6.8     10.0  

2009

   9.8     1.9     5.0     4.8  

As of

December 31, (M€)

  High   Low   Average   Year
end
 

2013

   9.0     2.0     4.0     5.0  

2012

   20.9     2.6     7.4     2.8  

2011

   21.0     12.7     16.0     17.6  

The Group has implemented strict policies and procedures to manage and monitor these market risks. These are based on the separation of control and front-office functions and on an integrated information system that enables real-time monitoring of trading activities.

Limits on trading positions are approved by the Group’s Executive Committee and are monitored daily. To increase flexibility and encourage liquidity, hedging operations are performed with numerous independent operators,

including other oil companies, major energy producers or consumers and financial institutions. The Group has established counterparty limits and monitors outstanding amounts with each counterparty on an ongoing basis.

Financial markets related risks

As part of its financing and cash management activities, the Group uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These instruments are principallymainly interest rate and currency swaps. The Group may also occasionally use on a less frequent basis, futures contracts and options contracts.options. These operations and their accounting treatment are detailed in Notes 1 paragraph M, 20, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Risks relative to cash management operations and to interest rate and foreign exchange financial instruments are managed according to rules set by the Group’s senior management, which provide for regular pooling of available cash balances, open positions and management of the financial instruments by the Treasury Department. Excess cash of the Group is deposited mainly in government institutions, deposit banks, or major companies through deposits, reverse repurchase agreements and purchase of commercial paper. Liquidity positions and the management of financial instruments are centralized by the Treasury Department, where they are managed by a team specialized in foreign exchange and interest rate market transactions.

The Cash Monitoring-Management Unit within the Treasury Department monitors limits and positions per bank on a daily basis and results of the Front Office. This unit also prepares marked-to-market valuations of used financial instruments and, when necessary, performs sensitivity analysis.

Counterparty risk

The Group has established standards for market transactions under which bank counterparties must be approved in advance, based on an assessment of the counterparty’s financial soundness (multi-criteria analysis including a review of market prices and of the Credit Default Swap (CDS), its ratings with Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, which must be of high quality, and its overall financial condition).

An overall authorized credit limit is set for each bank and is allotted among the subsidiaries and the Group’s central treasury entities according to their needs.

To reduce the market values risk on its commitments, in particular for swaps set as part of bonds issuance, the Treasury Department also developed a system of margin call that is gradually implemented with significant counterparties.

F-84TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Currency exposure

The Group seeks to minimize the currency exposure of each entity to its functional currency (primarily the euro, the dollar, the Canadian dollar, the pound sterling and the Norwegian krone).

For currency exposure generated by commercial activity, the hedging of revenues and costs in foreign currencies is typically performed using currency operations on the spot market and, in some cases, on the forward market. The Group rarely hedges future cash flows, although it may use options to do so.

With respect to currency exposure linked to non-current assets booked in a currency other than the euro, the Group has a policy of reducing the related currency exposure by financing these assets in the same currency.

Net short-term currency exposure is periodically monitored against limits set by the Group’s senior management.

The non-current debt described in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements is generally raised by the corporate treasury entities either directly in dollars in euros or in Canadian dollars,euros, or in other currencies which are then exchanged for dollars or euros through swaps issues to appropriately match general corporate needs. The proceeds from these debt issuances are loaned to

affiliates whose accounts are kept in dollars, in Canadian dollars or in euros. Thus, the net sensitivity of these positions to currency exposure is not significant.

The Group’s short-term currency swaps, the notional value of which appears in Note 29 to the Consolidated Financial

Statements, are used to attempt to optimize the centralized cash management of the Group. Thus, the sensitivity to currency fluctuations which may be induced is likewise considered negligible.

Short-term interest rate exposure and cash

Cash balances, which are primarily composed of euros and dollars, are managed according to the guidelines established by the Group’s senior management (maintain an adequate level of liquidity, optimize revenue from investments considering existing interest rate yield curves,

and minimize the cost of borrowing) over a less than twelve-month horizon and on the basis of a daily interest rate benchmark, primarily through short-term interest rate swaps and short-term currency swaps, without modifying currency exposure.

Interest rate risk on non-current debt

The Group’s policy consists of incurring non-current debt primarily at a floating rate, or, if the opportunity arises at the time of an issuance, at a fixed rate. Debt is incurred in dollars in euros or in Canadian dollarseuros according to general corporate needs. Long-term interest rate and currency swaps may be used to hedge bonds at their issuance in order to create a variable or fixed rate synthetic debt. In order to partially modify the interest rate structure of the long-term debt, TOTAL may also enter into long-term interest rate swaps.

 

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-85


Sensitivity analysis on interest rate and foreign exchange risk

The tables below present the potential impact of an increase or decrease of 10 basis points on the interest rate yield curves for each of the currencies on the fair value of the current financial instruments as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012, and 2009.2011.

 

            Change in fair
value due to a change
in interest rate by
 

Assets / (Liabilities) (M)

   
 
Carrying
amount
  
  
  
 
Estimated
fair value
  
  
  
 
+ 10 basis
points
  
  
  
 
- 10 basis
points
  
  

As of December 31, 2011

                 

Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)

   (21,402  (22,092  83    (83

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (146  (146  

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,976    1,976    

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   1,830    1,830    (49  49  

Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)

   3,488    3,488    3    (3

Other interest rates swaps

   (1  (1  3    (3

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts

   47    47          

As of December 31, 2010

                 

Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)

   (20,019  (20,408  86    (84

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (178  (178  

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,870    1,870    

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   1,692    1,692    (59  59  

Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)

   3,483    3,483    4    (4

Other interest rates swaps

   (2  (2  3    (3

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts

   (101  (101        

As of December 31, 2009

                 

Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)

   (18,368  (18,836  75    (75

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (241  (241  

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,025    1,025    

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   784    784    (57  57  

Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)

   (2,111  (2,111  3    (3

Other interest rates swaps

   (1  (1  1    (1

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts

   34    34          

            

Change in fair

value due to a change
in interest rate by

 
Assets / (Liabilities) (M€)  Carrying
amount
  

Estimated

fair value

  + 10 basis
points
  - 10 basis
points
 

As of December 31, 2013

                 

Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)

   (24,028  (24,629  39    (39

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (236  (236        

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,028    1,028          

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   792    792    (28  27  

Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)

   3,784    3,784    4    (4

Other interest rates swaps

   (1  (1  (1  1  

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts

   13    13          

As of December 31, 2012

                 

Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)

   (21,346  (21,545  97    (97

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (11  (11        

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,626    1,626          

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   1,615    1,615    (58  58  

Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)

   4,251    4,251    4    (4

Other interest rates swaps

           2    (2

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts

   (50  (50        

As of December 31, 2011

                 

Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)

   (21,402  (22,092  83    (83

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)

   (146  (146        

    Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)

   1,976    1,976          

Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)

   1,830    1,830    (49  49  

Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)

   3,488    3,488    3    (3

Other interest rates swaps

   (1  (1  3    (3

Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts

   47    47          

The impact of changes in interest rates on the cost of net debt before tax is as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31, (M)  2011 2010 2009 
For the year ended December 31, (M€)  2013 2012 2011 

Cost of net debt

   (440  (334  (398   (606  (571  (440

Interest rate translation of :

        

+ 10 basis points

   (10  (11  (11   (11  (11  (10

- 10 basis points

   10    11    11     11    11    10  

+ 100 basis points

   (103  (107  (108   (113  (106  (103

- 100 basis points

   103    107    108     113    106    103  

As a result of the policy for the management of currency exposure previously described, the Group’s sensitivity to currency exposure is primarily influenced by the net equity of the subsidiaries whose functional currency is the dollar and, to a lesser extent, the pound sterling and the Norwegian krone and the Canadian dollar.krone.

This sensitivity is reflected in the historical evolution of the currency translation adjustment recorded in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity which, in the course of the last three fiscal years, is essentially related to the fluctuation of dollar and pound sterling and is set forth in the table below:

 

    Euro / Dollar
exchange rates
   Euro / Pound sterling
exchange rates
 

As of December 31, 2011

   1.29     0.84  

As of December 31, 2010

   1.34     0.86  

As of December 31, 2009

   1.44     0.89  

    Euro /Dollar
exchange rates
   Euro / Pound sterling
exchange rates
 

As of December 31, 2013

   1.38     0.83  

As of December 31, 2012

   1.32     0.82  

As of December 31, 2011

   1.29     0.84  

As of December 31, 2011 (M)  Total  Euro   Dollar  Pound
sterling
  Other currencies and
equity affiliates
(a)
 

Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate

   69,025    41,396     21,728    4,713    1,188  

Currency translation adjustment before net investment hedge

   (962    127    (923  (166

Net investment hedge — open instruments

   (26    (25  (1    

Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate as of December 31, 2011

   68,037    41,396     21,830    3,789    1,022  
      
As of December 31, 2010 (M)  Total  Euro   Dollar  Pound
sterling
  Other currencies and
equity affiliates
(a)
 

Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate

   62,909    32,894     22,242    4,997    2,776  

Currency translation adjustment before net investment hedge

   (2,501       (1,237  (1,274  10  

Net investment hedge — open instruments

   6         6          

Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate as of December 31, 2010

   60,414    32,894     21,011    3,723    2,786  
As of December 31, 2009 (M)  Total  Euro   Dollar  Pound
sterling
  Other currencies and
equity affiliates
 

Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate

   57,621    27,717     18,671    5,201    6,032  

Currency translation adjustment before net investment hedge

   (5,074       (3,027  (1,465  (582

Net investment hedge — open instruments

   5         6    (1    

Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate as of December 31, 2009

   52,552    27,717     15,650    3,735    5,450  

 

(a)The decrease in the heading “Other currencies and equity affiliates” is mainly explained by the change in the consolidation method of Sanofi (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The contribution to the shareholders’ equity of this investment is now reclassified into the heading for the Eurozone.
F-86TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


As of December 31, 2013 (M€)  Total  Euro   Dollar  Pound
sterling
  Other currencies and
equity affiliates
 

Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate

   77,014    46,984     23,599    4,289    2,142  

Currency translation adjustment before net investment hedge

   (4,385       (2,524  (931  (930

Net investment hedge — open instruments

                      

Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate as of December 31, 2013

   72,629    46,984     21,075    3,358    1,212  
      
As of December 31, 2012 (M€)  Total  Euro   Dollar  Pound
sterling
  Other currencies and
equity affiliates
 

Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate

   72,689    44,968     22,253    4,268    1,200  

Currency translation adjustment before net investment hedge

   (1,504       (782  (837  115  

Net investment hedge — open instruments

                      

Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate as of December 31, 2012

   71,185    44,968     21,471    3,431    1,315  
      
As of December 31, 2011 (M€)  Total  Euro   Dollar  Pound
sterling
  Other currencies and
equity affiliates
 

Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate

   67,949    40,763     21,554    4,464    1,168  

Currency translation adjustment before net investment hedge

   (978       120    (931  (167

Net investment hedge — open instruments

   (26       (25  (1    

Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate as of December 31, 2011

   66,945    40,763     21,649    3,532    1,001  

As a result of this policy, the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations on consolidated income, as illustrated in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, has not been significant over the last three years despite the considerable fluctuation of the dollar (gain(a gain of6 million in 2013, a gain of26 million in 2012 and a gain of118 million in 2011, nil result in 2010, loss of32 million in 2009)2011).

Stock market risk

The Group holds interests in a number of publicly-traded companies (see Notes 12 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The market value of these holdings fluctuates due to various factors, including stock market trends, valuations of the sectors in which the companies operate, and the economic and financial condition of each individual company.

Liquidity risk

TOTAL S.A. has confirmed lines of credit granted by international banks, which are calculated to allow it to manage its short-term liquidity needs as required.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, these lines of credit amounted to $10,139$11,031 million, of which $10,096$11,031 million was unused. The agreements for the lines of credit granted to TOTAL S.A. do not contain conditions related to the Company’s financial ratios, to its financial ratings from specialized agencies, or to the occurrence of events that could have a material adverse effect on its financial position. As of December 31, 2011,2013, the aggregate amount of the principal confirmed lines of credit granted by international banks to Group companies, including TOTAL S.A., was $11,447$11,581 million, of which $11,154$11,421 million was unused. The lines of credit granted to Group companies other than TOTAL S.A. are not intended to finance the Group’s general needs; they are intended to finance either the general needs of the borrowing subsidiary or a specific project.

The following tables show the maturity of the financial assets and liabilities of the Group as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 (see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

As of December 31, 2011 (M)
Assets/(Liabilities)
  Less than
one year
 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years More than
5 years
 Total 
As of December 31, 2013 (M€)
Assets/(Liabilities)
 Less than
one year
 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years More than
5 years
 Total 

Non-current financial debt (notional value excluding interests)

    (4,492  (3,630  (3,614  (1,519  (7,326  (20,581      (3,370  (3,284  (3,015  (3,162  (11,210  (24,041

Current borrowings

   (9,675       (9,675  (8,116                      (8,116

Other current financial liabilities

   (167       (167  (276                      (276

Current financial assets

   700         700    536                        536  

Assets and liabilities available for sale or exchange

  130                        130  

Cash and cash equivalents

   14,025    14,025    14,647                        14,647  

Net amount before financial expense

   4,883    (4,492  (3,630  (3,614  (1,519  (7,326  (15,698  6,921    (3,370  (3,284  (3,015  (3,162  (11,210  (17,120

Financial expense on non-current financial debt

   (785  (691  (521  (417  (302  (1,075  (3,791  (729  (661  (554  (508  (447  (1,294  (4,193

Interest differential on swaps

   320    331    221    120    55    44    1,091    350    284    100    (24  (80  (515  115  

Net amount

   4,418    (4,852  (3,930  (3,911  (1,766  (8,357  (18,398  6,542    (3,747  (3,738  (3,547  (3,689  (13,019  (21,198
   
As of December 31, 2010
(M) Assets/(Liabilities)
  Less than
one year
 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years More than
5 years
 Total 

Non-current financial debt (notional value excluding interests)

    (3,355  (3,544  (2,218  (3,404  (6,392  (18,913

Current borrowings

   (9,653       (9,653

Other current financial liabilities

   (159       (159

Current financial assets

   1,205         1,205  

Cash and cash equivalents

   14,489    14,489  

Net amount before financial expense

   5,882    (3,355  (3,544  (2,218  (3,404  (6,392  (13,031

Financial expense on non-current financial debt

   (843  (729  (605  (450  (358  (1,195  (4,180

Interest differential on swaps

   461    334    153    33    2    (78  905  

Net amount

   5,500    (3,750  (3,996  (2,635  (3,760  (7,665  (16,306
   
As of December 31, 2009
(M) Assets/(Liabilities)
  Less than
one year
 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years More than
5 years
 Total 

Non-current financial debt (notional value excluding interests)

    (3,658  (3,277  (3,545  (2,109  (5,823  (18,412

Current borrowings

   (6,994       (6,994

Other current financial liabilities

   (123       (123

Current financial assets

   311         311  

Cash and cash equivalents

   11,662    11,662  

Net amount before financial expense

   4,856    (3,658  (3,277  (3,545  (2,109  (5,823  (13,556

Financial expense on non-current financial debt

   (768  (697  (561  (448  (301  (1,112  (3,887

Interest differential on swaps

   447    233    100    25    (16  (55  734  

Net amount

   4,535    (4,122  (3,738  (3,968  (2,426  (6,990  (16,709

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-87


        
As of December 31, 2012 (M€)
Assets/(Liabilities)
 Less than
one year
  1-2 years  2-3 years  3-4 years  4-5 years  More than
5 years
  Total 

Non-current financial debt (notional value excluding interests)

      (3,832  (3,465  (2,125  (3,126  (8,100  (20,648

Current borrowings

  (11,016                      (11,016

Other current financial liabilities

  (176                      (176

Current financial assets

  1,562                        1,562  

Assets and liabilities available for sale or exchange

  (756                      (756

Cash and cash equivalents

  15,469                        15,469  

Net amount before financial expense

  5,083    (3,832  (3,465  (2,125  (3,126  (8,100  (15,565

Financial expense on non-current financial debt

  (746  (625  (519  (405  (352  (1,078  (3,725

Interest differential on swaps

  371    335    225    106    62    (37  1,062  

Net amount

  4,708    (4,122  (3,760  (2,424  (3,416  (9,215  (18,228
                             
As of December 31, 2011 (M€)
Assets/(Liabilities)
 Less than
one year
  1-2 years  2-3 years  3-4 years  4-5 years  More than
5 years
  Total 

Non-current financial debt (notional value excluding interests)

      (4,492  (3,630  (3,614  (1,519  (7,326  (20,581

Current borrowings

  (9,675                      (9,675

Other current financial liabilities

  (167                      (167

Current financial assets

  700                        700  

Cash and cash equivalents

  14,025                        14,025  

Net amount before financial expense

  4,883    (4,492  (3,630  (3,614  (1,519  (7,326  (15,698

Financial expense on non-current financial debt

  (785  (691  (521  (417  (302  (1,075  (3,791

Interest differential on swaps

  320    331    221    120    55    44    1,091  

Net amount

  4,418    (4,852  (3,930  (3,911  (1,766  (8,357  (18,398

In addition, the Group guarantees bank debt and finance lease obligations of certain non-consolidated companies and equity affiliates. A payment would be triggered by failure of the guaranteed party to fulfill its obligation covered by the guarantee, and no assets are held as collateral for these guarantees. Maturity dates and amounts are set forth in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (“Guarantees given against borrowings”).

The Group also guarantees the current liabilities of certain non-consolidated companies. Performance under these guarantees would be triggered by a financial default of these entities. Maturity dates and amounts are set forth in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (“Guarantees of current liabilities”).

The following table sets forth financial assets and liabilities related to operating activities as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 (see Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

As of December 31 (M)
Assets/(Liabilities)
  2011 2010 2009 

As of December 31 (M€)

Assets/(Liabilities)

  2013 2012 2011 

Accounts payable

   (22,086  (18,450  (15,383   (21,958  (21,648  (22,086

Other operating liabilities

   (5,441  (3,574  (4,706   (5,941  (5,904  (5,441

including financial instruments related to commodity contracts

   (606  (559  (923   (615  (456  (548

Accounts receivable, net

   20,049    18,159    15,719     16,984    19,206    20,049  

Other operating receivables

   7,467    4,407    5,145     7,191    6,158    7,467  

including financial instruments related to commodity contracts

   1,074    499    1,029     927    681    1,017  

Total

   (11  542    775     (3,724  (2,188  (11

These financial assets and liabilities mainly have a maturity date below one year.

Credit risk

Credit risk is defined as the risk of the counterparty to a contract failing to perform or pay the amounts due.

The Group is exposed to credit risks in its operating and financing activities. The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk is partially related to financial assets recorded on its balance sheet, including energy derivative instruments that have a positive market value.

F-88TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


The following table presents the Group’s maximum credit risk exposure:

 

As of December 31, (M) Assets/
(Liabilities)
 2011  2010  2009 

Loans to equity affiliates(Note 12)

  2,246    2,383    2,367  

Loans and advances(Note 14)

  2,055    1,596    1,284  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt(Note 20)

  1,976    1,870    1,025  

Accounts receivable(Note 16)

  20,049    18,159    15,719  

Other operating receivables (Note 16)

  7,467    4,407    5,145  

Current financial assets(Note 20)

  700    1,205    311  

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 27)

  14,025    14,489    11,662  

Total

  48,518    44,109    37,513  

As of December 31, (M€)

Assets/(Liabilities)

 2013  2012  2011 

Loans to equity affiliates(note 12)

  2,577    2,360    2,246  

Loans and advances(note 14)

  2,592    2,207    2,055  

Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt(note 20)

  1,028    1,626    1,976  

Accounts receivable(note 16)

  16,984    19,206    20,049  

Other operating receivables(note 16)

  7,191    6,158    7,467  

Current financial assets(note 20)

  536    1,562    700  

Cash and cash equivalents(note 27)

  14,647    15,469    14,025  

Total

  45,555    48,588    48,518  

The valuation allowance on loans and advances and on accounts receivable and other operating receivables is detailed respectively in Notes 14 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of its credit risk management related to operating and financing activities, the Group has developed margin call contracts with certain counterparties. As of

December 31, 2011,2013, the net amount received as part of these margin calls was1,682801 million (against1,5601,635 million as of December 31, 20102012 and6931,682 million as of December 31, 2009)2011).

Credit risk is managed by the Group’s business segments as follows:

 

Upstream Segmentsegment

 

Exploration & Production

Exploration & Production

Risks arising under contracts with government authorities or other oil companies or under long-term supply contracts necessary for the development of projects are evaluated during the project approval process. The long-term aspect of these contracts and the high-quality of the other parties lead to a low level of credit risk.

Risks related to commercial operations, other than those described above (which are, in practice, directly monitored by subsidiaries), are subject to procedures for establishing and reviewing credit.

Customer receivables are subject to provisions on a case-by-case basis, based on prior history and management’s assessment of the facts and circumstances.

 

Gas & Power

Gas & Power

The Gas & Power division deals with counterparties in the energy, industrial and financial sectors throughout the world. Financial institutions providing credit risk coverage are highly rated international bank and insurance groups.

Potential counterparties are subject to credit assessment and approval before concluding transactions and are thereafter subject to regular review, including re-appraisal and approval of the limits previously granted.

The creditworthiness of counterparties is assessed based on an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data regarding financial standing and business risks, together with the review of any relevant third party and market information, such as data published by rating agencies. On this basis, credit limits are defined for each potential counterparty and, where appropriate, transactions are subject to specific authorisations.authorizations.

Credit exposure, which is essentially an economic exposure or an expected future physical exposure, is permanently monitored and subject to sensitivity measures.

Credit risk is mitigated by the systematic use of industry standard contractual frameworks that permit netting, enable requiring added security in case of adverse change in the counterparty risk, and allow for termination of the contract upon occurrence of certain events of default.

 

Downstream SegmentRefining & Chemicals segment

 

Refining & Chemicals

Credit risk is primarily related to commercial receivables. Internal procedures of Refining & Marketing

Internal proceduresChemicals include rules for the Refining & Marketing division include rules onmanagement of credit risk that describedescribing the basisfundamentals of internal control in this domain, includingdomain. Each division implements procedures for managing and provisioning credit risk that differ based on the separationsize of authority between commercial and financial operations. Credit policies are defined at the local level, complemented by the implementation of procedures to monitor customer risk (credit committees at the subsidiary level,and the creationmarket in which it operates. The principal elements of these procedures are:

implementation of credit limits with different authorization procedures for corporate customers, portfoliopossible credit overruns;

use of insurance policies or specific guarantees etc.)(letters of credit);

regular monitoring and assessment of overdue accounts (aging balance), including collection procedures; and

provisioning of bad debts on a customer-by-customer basis, according to payment delays and local payment practices (provisions may also be calculated based on statistics).

Each entity also implements monitoring of its outstanding receivables. Risks relatedCounterparties are subject to credit may be mitigated or limited by subscriptionassessment and approval prior to any transaction being concluded. Regular reviews are made for all active counterparties including a

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-89


re-appraisal and renewing of the granted credit insurance and/or requiring security or guarantees.

Bad debtslimits. The limits of the counterparties are provisioned on a case-by-case basis at a rate determined by managementassessed based on an assessmentquantitative and qualitative data regarding financial standing, together with the review of the risk of credit loss.any relevant third party and market information, such as that provided by rating agencies and insurance companies.

 

Trading & Shipping

Trading & Shipping

Trading & Shipping deals with commercial counterparties and financial institutions located throughout the world. Counterparties to physical and derivative transactions are primarily entities involved in the oil and gas industry or in the trading of energy commodities, or financial institutions. Credit risk coverage is concluded with financial institutions, international banks and insurance groups selected in accordance with strict criteria.

The Trading & Shipping division has a strict policy of internal delegation of authority governing establishment of country and counterparty credit limits and approval of specific transactions. Credit exposures contracted under these limits and approvals are monitored on a daily basis.

Potential counterparties are subject to credit assessment and approval prior to any transaction being concluded and all active counterparties are subject to regular reviews, including re-appraisal and approval of granted limits. The creditworthiness of counterparties is assessed based on an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data regarding financial standing and business risks, together with the review of any relevant third party and market information, such as ratings published by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and other agencies.

Contractual arrangements are structured so as to maximize the risk mitigation benefits of netting between transactions wherever possible and additional protective

terms providing for the provision of security in the event of financial deterioration and the termination of transactions on the occurrence of defined default events are used to the greatest permitted extent.

Credit risks in excess of approved levels are secured by means of letters of credit and other guarantees, cash deposits and insurance arrangements. In respect of derivative transactions, risks are secured by margin call contracts wherever possible.

 

Marketing & Services segment

Chemicals Segment

Credit risk in the Chemicals segment is primarily related to commercial receivables. Each division implementsInternal procedures for managing and provisioningthe Marketing & Services division include rules on credit risk that differ based ondescribe the sizebasis of

internal control in this domain, including the separation of authority between commercial and financial operations. Credit policies are defined at the local level, complemented by the implementation of procedures to monitor customer risk (credit committees at the subsidiary andlevel, the market in which it operates. The principal elements of these procedures are:

implementationcreation of credit limits with different authorization procedures for possiblecorporate customers, portfolio guarantees, etc.).

Each entity also implements monitoring of its outstanding receivables. Risks related to credit overruns;

usemay be mitigated or limited by subscription of credit insurance policies and/or specific guarantees (letters of credit);requiring security or guarantees.

regular monitoring andBad debts are provisioned on a case-by-case basis at a rate determined by management based on an assessment of overdue accounts (aging balance), including collection procedures; and

provisioningthe risk of bad debts on a customer-by-customer basis, according to payment delays and local payment practices (provisions may also be calculated based on statistics).credit loss.

 

32) OTHER RISKS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

TOTAL is not currently aware of any exceptional event, dispute, risks or contingent liabilities that could have a material impact on the assets and liabilities, results, financial position or operations of the Group.

The contingent commitments and contractual obligations are detailed in note 23 to the consolidated financial statement.

ANTITRUST INVESTIGATIONS

The principal antitrust proceedings in which the Group’s companies are involved are described hereafter.

Chemicalsthereafter.

 

 

As part of the spin-off of Arkema(1) in 2006, TOTAL S.A. orRefining & Chemicals segment

As part of the spin-off of Arkema1 in 2006, TOTAL S.A. and certain other Group companies agreed to grant Arkema a guarantee for potential monetary consequences related to antitrust proceedings arising from events prior to the spin-off.

This guarantee covers, for a period of ten years from the date of the spin-off, 90% of amounts paid by Arkemaa guarantee for potential monetary consequences related to (i) fines imposed by European authorities or European member-states for competition law violations, (ii) fines imposed by U.S. courts or antitrust authorities for federal antitrust violations or violations of the competition laws of U.S. states, (iii) damages awarded in civil proceedings relatedarising from events prior to the government proceedings mentioned above,spin-off.

As of December 31, 2013, all public and (iv) certain costs related to these proceedings. The guarantee related to anti-competition violations in Europe applies to amounts above a176.5 million threshold. On the other hand, the agreements provide that Arkema will indemnify TOTAL S.A. or any Group company for 10% of any amount that TOTAL S.A. or any Group company are required to pay under any of thecivil proceedings covered by thisthe guarantee were definitively resolved in Europe.

If one or more individuals or legal entities, acting alone or together, directly or indirectly holds more than one-third of the voting rights of Arkema, or if Arkema transfers more than 50% of its assets (as calculated under the enterprise valuation method, as of the date of the transfer) to a third party or parties acting together, irrespective of the type or number of transfers, this guarantee will become void.

InEurope and in the United States, civil liability lawsuits, for which TOTAL S.A.States. Despite the fact that Arkema has been named asimplemented since 2001 compliance procedures that are designed to prevent its employees from violating antitrust provisions, it is not possible to exclude the parent company, are closed without significant impact onpossibility that the Group’s financial position.

In Europe, since 2006, the European Commission has fined companies of the Group in its configurationrelevant authorities could commence additional proceedings involving Arkema regarding events prior to the spin-off an overall amount of385.47 million, of which Elf Aquitaine and/or TOTAL S.A. were held jointly liable for280.17 million, Elf Aquitaine being personally fined23.6 million for deterrence. These fines are entirely settled as of today.

As a result, since the spin-off, the Group has paid the overall amount of188.07 million(2), corresponding to 90% of the fines overall amount once the threshold

provided for by the guarantee is deducted to which an amount of31.31 million of interest has been added as explained hereinafter.

The European Commission imposed these fines following investigations between 2000 and 2004 into commercial practices involving eight products sold by Arkema. Five of these investigations resulted in prosecutions from the European Commission for which Elf Aquitaine has been named as the parent company, and two of these investigations named TOTAL S.A. as the ultimate parent company of the Group.

TOTAL S.A. and Elf Aquitaine are contesting their liability based solely on their status as parent companies and appealed for cancellation and reformation of the rulings that are still pending before the relevant EU court of appeals or supreme court of appeals.

During the year 2011, four of the proceedings have evolved and are closed as far as Arkema is concerned:spin-off.

 

 

In one of these proceedings, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has rejected the action of Arkema while the decisions of the European Commission and of the General Court of the European Union against the parent companies have been squashed. Consequently, this proceeding is definitively closed regarding Arkema as well as the parent companies.Marketing & Services segment

 

  

In two other proceedings, previous decisions against Arkema and the parent companies have been upheld by the General Court of the European Union. While the parent companies have introduced an appeal before the CJEU, Arkema did not appeal to the CJEU.

Finally, in a last proceeding, the General Court has decided to reduce the amount of the fine initially ordered against Arkema while, in parallel, it has rejected the actions of the parent companies that have remained obliged to pay the whole amount of the fine initially orderedThe administrative procedure opened by the European Commission. Arkema has accepted this decision while theCommission against TOTAL Nederland N.V and TOTAL S.A., as parent companies have introduced an appeal before the CJEU.company, in relation to practices regarding a product line of

 

 

F-90

F-90TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013

 

(1)1

Arkema is used in this section to designate those companies of the Arkema group whose ultimate parent company is Arkema S.A. Arkema became an independent company after being spun-off from TOTAL S.A. in May 2006.

(2)This amount does not take into account a case that led to Arkema, prior to Arkema’s spin-off from TOTAL, and Elf Aquitaine being fined jointly45 million and Arkema being fined13.5 million.


With the exception of the31.31 million of interest charged by the European Commission to the parent companies, which has been required to pay in accordance with the decision concerning the last proceeding referred hereinabove, the evolution of the proceedings during the year 2011 did not modify the global amount assumed by the Group in execution of the guarantee.

In addition, civil proceedings against Arkema and other groups of companies were initiated in 2009 and 2011, respectively, before German and Dutch courts by third parties for alleged damages pursuant to two of the above mentioned legal proceedings. TOTAL S.A. was summoned to serve notice of the dispute before the German court. At this point, the probability to have a favorable verdict and the financial impacts of these proceedings are uncertain due to the number of legal difficulties they give rise to, the lack of documented claims and evaluations of the alleged damages.

Arkema began implementing compliance procedures in 2001 that are designed to prevent its employees from violating antitrust provisions. However, it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the relevant authorities could commence additional proceedings involving Arkema regarding events prior to the spin-off, as well as Elf Aquitaine and/or TOTAL S.A. based on their status as parent company.

Within the framework of all of the legal proceedings described above, a17 million reserve remains booked in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011.

Downstream

the Marketing & Services segment, resulted in a condemnation in 2006 that became definitive in 2012. The resulting fine (20.25 million) and interest thereon were paid during the first quarter of 2013.

 

Pursuant to a statement of objections received by Total Nederland N.V. and TOTAL S.A. (based on its status as parent company) from the European Commission, Total Nederland N.V. was fined20.25 million in 2006, for which TOTAL S.A. was held jointly liable for13.5 million. TOTAL S.A. appealed this decision before the relevant court and this appeal is still pending.

Following the appeal lodged by the Group’s companies against the European Commission’s 2008 decision fining Total Marketing Services an amount of128.2 million, in relation to practices regarding a product line of the Marketing & Services segment, which the company had already paid, and concerning which TOTAL S.A. was declared jointly liable as the parent company, the relevant European court decided during the third quarter of 2013 to reduce the fine imposed on Total Marketing Services to125.5 million without modifying the liability of TOTAL S.A. as parent company. Appeals have been lodged against this judgment.

 

In the United Kingdom, a settlement took place in the third quarter of 2013 putting an end to the civil proceeding initiated against TOTAL S.A., Total Marketing Services and other companies, by third parties alleging damages in connection with practices already sanctioned by the European Commission. A similar civil proceeding is pending in the Netherlands. At this stage, the plaintiffs have not communicated the amount of their claim.

In addition, pursuant to a statement of objections received by Total Raffinage Marketing (formerly Total France) and TOTAL S.A. from the European Commission regarding another product line of the Refining & Marketing division, Total Raffinage Marketing was fined128.2 million in 2008, which has been paid, and for which TOTAL S.A. was held jointly liable based on its status as parent company. TOTAL S.A. also appealed this decision before the relevant court and this appeal is still pending.

In addition, civil proceedings against TOTAL S.A and Total Raffinage Marketing and other companies were initiated before U.K and Dutch courts by third parties for alleged damages in connection with the prosecutions brought by the European Commission in this case. At this point, the probability to have a favorable verdict and the financial impacts of these procedures are uncertain due to the number of legal difficulties they gave rise to, the lack of documented claims and evaluations of the alleged damages.

Within the framework of the legal proceedings described above, a30 million reserve is booked in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011.

Finally, in Italy, in 2013, a civil proceeding was initiated against TOTAL S.A. and its subsidiary Total Aviazione Italia Srl before the competent Italian civil court. The plaintiff claims against TOTAL S.A., its subsidiary and other third parties, damages that it estimates to be nearly908 million. This procedure follows practices that had been sanctioned by the Italian competition authority in 2006. The existence and the assessment of the alleged damages in this procedure involving multiple defendants are strongly contested.

Whatever the evolution of the proceedings described above, the Group believes that their outcome should not have a material adverse effect on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.

GRANDE PAROISSE

An explosion occurred at the Grande Paroisse industrial site in the city of Toulouse in France on September 21, 2001. Grande Paroisse, a former subsidiary of Atofina which became a subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine Fertilisants on

December 31, 2004, as part of the reorganization of the Chemicals segment, was principally engaged in the production and sale of agricultural fertilizers. The explosion, which involved a stockpile of ammonium nitrate pellets, destroyed a portion of the site and caused the death of thirty-one people, including twenty-one workers at the site, and injured many others. The explosion also caused significant damage to certain property in part of the city of Toulouse.

This plant has been closed and individual assistance packages have been provided for employees. The site has been rehabilitated.

On December 14, 2006, Grande Paroisse signed, under the supervision of the city of Toulouse, thea deed whereby it donated the former site of the AZF plant to the greater agglomeration of Toulouse (CAGT) and theCaisse des dépôts et consignations and its subsidiary ICADE. Under this deed, TOTAL S.A. guaranteed the site restorationremediation obligations of Grande Paroisse and granted a10 million endowment to the InNaBioSanté research foundation as part of the setting up of a cancer research center at the site by the city of Toulouse.

RegardingAfter having articulated several hypotheses, the cause of the explosion, the hypothesis that the explosion was caused by Grande Paroisse through the accidental mixing of hundreds of kilos of a chlorine compound at a storage site for ammonium nitrate was

discredited over the course of the investigation. As a result, proceedings against ten of the eleven Grande Paroisse employees charged during the criminal investigation conducted by the Toulouse Regional Court (Tribunal de grande instance) were dismissed and this dismissal was upheld on appeal. Nevertheless, theCourt-appointed experts did not maintain in their final experts’ report filed on May 11, 2006, continued to focus on the hypothesis of a chemical accident, although this hypothesis was not confirmed during the attempt to reconstruct the accident at the site. After having articulated several hypotheses, the experts no longer maintain that the accident was caused by pouring a large quantity of a chlorine compound over ammonium nitrate. Instead, the experts have retained a scenario where a container of chlorine compound sweepings was poured between a layer of wet ammonium nitrate covering the floor and a quantity of dry agricultural nitrate at a location not far from the principal storage site. This is claimed to have caused an explosion which then spread into the main storage site. Grande Paroisse was investigated based on this new hypothesis in 2006; Grande Paroisse is contesting this explanation, which it believes to be based on elements that are not factually accurate.

All the requests for additional investigations that were submitted by Grande Paroisse, the former site manager and various plaintiffs were denied on appeal after the end of the criminal investigation procedure. On July 9, 2007, the investigating judgemagistrate brought charges against Grande Paroisse and the former plant managerPlant Manager before the criminal chamber of the Court of Appeal of Toulouse.Toulouse Criminal Court. In late 2008, TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest, Chairman and CEO at the time of the event, were summoned to appear in Court pursuant to a request by a victims association. The trial for this case began on February 23, 2009, and lasted approximately four months.

On November 19, 2009, the Toulouse Criminal Court acquitted both the former Plant Manager, and Grande Paroisse due to the lack of reliable evidence for the explosion. The Court also ruled that the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest Chairman and CEO at the time of the disaster, were inadmissible.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-91


Due to the presumption of civil liability that applied to Grande Paroisse, the Court declared Grande Paroisse civilly liable for the damages caused by the explosion to the victims in its capacity as custodian and operator of the plant.

The Prosecutor’s office, together with certain third parties, has appealed the Toulouse Criminal Court verdict. In order to preserve its rights, Grande Paroisse lodged a cross-appeal with respect to civil charges.

The appeal proceedings beforeBy its decision of September 24, 2012, the Court of Appeal of Toulouse started on November 3, 2011.(Cour d’appel de Toulouse) upheld the lower court verdict pursuant to which the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest were determined to be inadmissible. This element of the decision has been appealed by certain third parties before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation).

The Court of Appeal considered, however, that the explosion was the result of the chemical accident described by the court-appointed experts. Accordingly, it convicted the former Plant Manager and Grande Paroisse. This element of the decision has been appealed by the former Plant Manager and Grande Paroisse before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), which has the effect of suspending their criminal sentences.

A compensation mechanism for victims was set up immediately following the explosion.2.3 billion was paid for the compensation of claims and related expenses amounts. As of December 31, 2011, aA2112.7 million reserve was recorded in the Group’s consolidated balance sheet.

BUNCEFIELD

On December 11, 2005, several explosions, followed by a major fire, occurred at an oil storage depot at Buncefield, north of London. This depot was operated by Hertfordshire Oil Storage Limited (HOSL), a company in which TOTAL’s UK subsidiary holds 60% and another oil group holds 40%.

The explosion caused injuries, most of which were minor injuries, to a number of people and caused property damage to the depot and the buildings and homes located nearby. The official Independent Investigation Board has indicated that the explosion was caused by the overflow of a tank at the depot. The Board’s final report was released on December 11, 2008. The civil procedure for claims, which had not yet been settled, took place between October and December 2008. The Court’s decision of March 20, 2009, declared TOTAL’s UK subsidiary liable for the accident and solely liable for indemnifying the victims. The subsidiary appealed the decision. The appeal trial took place in January 2010. The Court of Appeals, by a decision handed down on March 4, 2010, confirmed the prior judgment. The Supreme Court of United Kingdom has partially authorized TOTAL’s UK subsidiary to contest the decision. TOTAL’s UK subsidiary finally decided to withdraw from this recourse due to settlement agreements reached in mid-February 2011.

The Group carries insurance for damage to its interests in these facilities, business interruption and civil liability claims from third parties. The provision for the civil liability that appearsremains booked in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011, stands at2013.80 million after taking into account the payments previously made.

The Group believes that, based on the information currently available, on a reasonable estimate of its liability and on provisions recognized, this accident should not have a significant impact on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.

In addition, on December 1, 2008, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the Environment Agency (EA) issued a Notice of prosecution against five companies, including TOTAL’s UK subsidiary. By a judgment on July 16, 2010, the subsidiary was fined £3.6 million and paid it. The decision takes into account a number of elements that have mitigated the impact of the charges brought against it.

ERIKA

Following the sinking in December 1999 of the Erika, a tanker that was transporting products belonging to one of the Group companies, theTribunal de grande instance of Paris convicted TOTAL S.A. of marine pollution pursuant to a judgment issued on January 16, 2008, finding that TOTAL S.A. was negligent in its vetting procedure for vessel selection, and ordering TOTAL S.A. to pay a fine of375,000. The Court also ordered compensation to be paid to those affected by the pollution from the Erika up to an aggregate amount of192 million, declaring TOTAL S.A. jointly and severally liable for such payments together with the Erika’s inspection and classification firm, the Erika’s owner and the Erika’s manager.

TOTAL has appealed the verdict of January 16, 2008. In the meantime, it nevertheless proposed to pay third parties who so requested definitive compensation as determined by the Court. Forty-two third parties have been compensated for an aggregate amount of171.5 million.

By a decision dated March 30, 2010, the Court of Appeal of Paris upheld the lower Court verdict pursuant to which TOTAL S.A. was convicted of marine pollution and fined375,000. TOTAL appealed this decision to the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation).

However, the Court of Appeal ruled that TOTAL S.A. bears no civil liability according to the applicable international conventions and consequently ruled that TOTAL S.A. be not convicted.

To facilitate the payment of damages awarded by the Court of Appeal in Paris to third parties against Erika’s controlling and classification firm, the ship-owner and the ship-manager, a global settlement agreement was signed late 2011 between these parties and TOTAL S.A. under the auspices of the IOPC Fund. Under this global settlement agreement, each party agreed to the withdrawal of all civil proceedings initiated against all other parties to the agreement.

TOTAL S.A. believes that, based on the information currently available, the case should not have a significant impact on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.

BLUE RAPID AND THE RUSSIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE — RUSSIAN REGIONS AND INTERNEFT

Blue Rapid, a Panamanian company, and the Russian Olympic Committee filed a claim for damages with the Paris Commercial Court against Elf Aquitaine, alleging a so-called non-completion by a former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine of a contract related to an exploration and

production project in Russia negotiated in the early 1990s. Elf Aquitaine believed this claim to be unfounded and opposed it. On January 12, 2009, the Commercial Court of Paris rejected Blue Rapid’s claim against Elf Aquitaine and found that the Russian Olympic Committee did not have standing in the matter. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this decision. On June 30, 2011, the Court of Appeal of Paris dismissed as inadmissible the claim of Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee against Elf Aquitaine, notably on the grounds of the contract’s termination.contract having lapsed. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this decision to the French Supreme Court.

In connection with the same facts, and fifteen years after the termination of the exploration and production contract, a Russian company, which was held not to be the contracting party to the contract, and two regions of the Russian Federation whichthat were not even parties to the contract, have launched an arbitration procedure against the aforementioned former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine that was liquidated in 2005, claiming alleged damages of U.S.$22.4 billion. For the same reasons as those successfully adjudicated by Elf Aquitaine against Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee, the Group considers this claim to be unfounded as to a matter of law orand fact. The Group has lodged a criminal complaint to denounce the fraudulent claim of which the Group believes it is a victim of and, has taken and reserved its rights to take other actions and measures to defend its interests.

IRAN

In 2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) followed by the Department of Justice (DoJ) issued a formal order directing an investigation in connection with the pursuit of business in Iran by certain oil companies including, among others, TOTAL.

The inquiry concernsconcerned an agreement concluded by the Company with a consultantconsultants concerning a gas fieldfields in Iran and aims to verifyaimed at verifying whether certain payments made under this agreement would have benefited Iranian officials in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the Company’s accounting obligations.

Investigations are still pendingIn late May 2013, and the Company is cooperatingafter several years of discussions, TOTAL reached settlements with the SEC and the DoJ. In 2010, the Company opened talks with U.S. authorities without any acknowledgement of facts, to consider an out-of-court settlement as it is often the case in this kind of proceeding.

Late in 2011, the SEC and(a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the DoJ proposedand a Cease and Desist Order with the SEC). These settlements, which put an end to TOTAL out-of-court settlements that would close their inquiries,these investigations, were concluded without admission of guilt and in exchange for TOTAL’s committing toTOTAL respecting a number of

obligations, including the payment of a fine ($245.2 million) and civil compensation ($153 million) that occurred during the second quarter of 2013. The reserve of $398.2 million that was booked in the financial statements as of June 30, 2012, has been fully released. By virtue of these settlements, TOTAL also accepted to appoint a French independent compliance monitor to review the Group’s compliance program and to recommend possible improvements.

obligations and paying fines. As TOTAL was unable to agree to several substantial elements of the proposal, the Company is continuing discussions with the U.S. authorities. The Company is free not to accept an out-of-court settlement solution, in which case it would be exposedWith respect to the risk of prosecution in the United States.

In this same affair, a parallel judicial inquiry related tofacts, TOTAL was initiated in France in 2006. In 2007, the Company’sand its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who was President of the Middle East at the time of the facts, were placed under formal investigation in relationFrance following a judicial inquiry initiated in 2006. In late May 2013, the Prosecutor’s office recommended that the case be sent to this inquiry, as the former President of the Middle East department of the Group’s Exploration & Production division.trial. The Companyinvestigating magistrate has not been notified of any significant developments in the proceedings since the formal investigation was launched.yet issued his decision.

F-92TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


At this point, the Company cannot determine when these investigations will terminate, and cannot predict their results, orconsiders that the outcomeresolution of the talks that have been initiated. Resolving these cases is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s financial situation or consequences onfor its future planned operations.

LIBYA

In June 2011, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued to certain oil companies — including, among others, TOTAL — a formal request for information related to their operations in Libya. In April 2013, the SEC notified TOTAL of the closure of the investigation while stating that it does not intend to take further action as far as TOTAL is concerned.

OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAM

Several countries have launched investigations concerning possible violations related to the United Nations (UN) Oil-for-Food programProgram in Iraq.

Pursuant to a French criminal investigation, certain current or former Group employeesEmployees were placed under formal criminal investigation for possible charges as accessories to the misappropriation of corporateCorporate assets and as accessories to the corruption of foreign public agents. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, formerly President of the Group’s Exploration & Production division, was also placed under formal investigation in October 2006. In 2007, the criminal investigation was closed and the case was transferred to the Prosecutor’s office. In 2009, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the investigating judgemagistrate that the case against the Group’s current and former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer not be pursued.

In early 2010, despite the recommendation of the Prosecutor’s office, a new investigating judge,magistrate, having taken over the case, decided to indict TOTAL S.A. on bribery charges as well as complicity and influence peddling. The indictment was brought eight years after the beginning of the investigation without any new evidence being introduced.

In October 2010, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the investigating judgemagistrate that the case against TOTAL S.A., the Group’s current and former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer not be pursued.

However, by ordinance notified in early August 2011, the investigating judgemagistrate on the matter decided to send the case to trial.

The Company believes that its activities related to On July 8, 2013, TOTAL S.A., the Oil-for-Food program have been in compliance with this program, as organizedGroup’s former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were cleared of all charges by the UN in 1996.

The Volcker report released by the independent investigating committee set up by the UN had discarded any bribery grievance within the frameworkCriminal Court, which found that none of the Oil-For-Food program with respect to TOTAL.offenses for which they had been prosecuted were established. On

July 18, 2013, the Prosecutor’s office appealed the parts of the Criminal Court’s decision acquitting TOTAL S.A. and certain of the Group’s former employees. TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s acquittal issued on July 8, 2013 is irrevocable since the Prosecutor’s office did not appeal this part of the Criminal Court’s decision.

ITALY

As part of an investigation led by the Prosecutor of the Republic of the Potenza Court, Total Italia and certain Group’sGroup employees arewere the subject of an investigation related to certain calls for tenders that Total Italia made for the preparation and development of an oil field. On February 16, 2009, as a preliminary measure before the proceedings go before the Court, the preliminary investigation judge of Potenza served notice to Total Italia of a decision that would suspend the concession for this field for one year. Total Italia has appealed the decision by the preliminary investigation judge before the Court of Appeal of Potenza. In a decision dated April 8, 2009, the Court reversed the suspension of the concession and appointed for one year,i.e.until February 16, 2010, a judicial administrator to supervise the operations related to the development of the concession, allowing the Tempa Rossa project to continue.

The criminal investigation was closed in the first half of 2010. The preliminary hearing judge, who will decide whether the case shall be returned to the Criminal Court to be judged on the merits, held the first hearing on December 6, 2010. The proceedings beforeIn May 2012, the Judge of the preliminary hearing are still pending.decided to dismiss the charges against some of the Group’s employees and to refer the case for trial for a reduced number of charges. The trial started on September 26, 2012.

In 2010, Total Italia’s exploration and production operations were transferred to Total E&P Italia and refining and marketing operations were merged with those of Erg Petroli.

LIBYARIVUNION

DuringOn July 9, 2012, the financial year 2011,Swiss Tribunal Fédéral (Switzerland’s Supreme Court) rendered a decision against Rivunion, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine, confirming a tax reassessment in the Group’s activities were affectedamount of CHF 171 million (excluding interest for late payment). According to the Tribunal, Rivunion was held liable as tax collector of withholding taxes owed by the security contextbeneficiaries of taxable services. Rivunion, in Libya, andliquidation since March 12, 2002, unable to recover the Group’s production was gradually shut downamounts corresponding to the withholding taxes in order to meet its fiscal obligations, has been subject to insolvency proceedings since November 1, 2012. On August 29, 2013, the Swiss federal tax administration lodged a claim as from the end of February. The Group’s production started up again at the end of September 2011 on the offshore Al Jurf field located in zones 15, 16 & 32 (ex C137) at the level existing before the events, and has gradually restarted since October 2011 in onshore zones 129, 130 and 131. The restartpart of the Group’s production on the other onshore zones is expected to occur progressively in 2012.insolvency

 

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-93


In June 2011, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued to certain oil companies —proceedings of Rivunion, for an amount of CHF 284 million, including among others, TOTAL — a formal request for information related to their operations in Libya. TOTAL is cooperating with this non public investigation.

YEMEN

During the financial year 2011, the Group’s activities were not significantly impacted by the security context in Yemen, but the Group nevertheless reorganized locally to minimize the risks to its personnel. In addition, on October 15, 2011, the gas pipeline supplying Yemen LNG was sabotaged, and then repaired with no delay, enabling LNG production to resume as from October 26, 2011.

SYRIA

In May 2011, the European Union adopted measures with criminal and financial penalties that prohibit the supplyCHF 171 million of certain equipment to Syria,principal as well as certain financial and asset transactions with respect to a list of named individuals and entities. These measures apply to European persons and to entities constituted under the laws of a EU Member State. In September 2011, the EU adopted further measures, including, notably, a prohibition on the purchase, import or transportation from Syria of crude oil and petroleum products. Since early September 2011, the Group ceased to purchase hydrocarbons from Syria. On December 1, 2011, the EU extended sanctions against, among others, three state-owned Syrian oil firms, including General Petroleum Corporation, the Group’s co-contracting partner in PSA 1988 (Deir Es Zor license) and the Tabiyeh contract. Since early December 2011, TOTAL has ceased its activities that contribute to oil and gas production in Syria.interest for late payment.

33)OTHER INFORMATION

Research and development costs incurred by the Group in 20112013 amounted to776949 million (715805 million in 20102012 and650776 million in 2009)2011), corresponding to 0.4%0.5% of the sales.

The staff dedicated in 20112013 to these research and development activities are estimated at 4,684 people (4,110 in 2012 and 3,946 people (4,087 in 2010 and 4,016 in 2009)2011).

 

34) CHANGES IN PROGRESS IN THE GROUP STRUCTURE

 

TOTAL signed in March 2011 agreements for the acquisition in Uganda of a one-third interest in Blocks 1, 2 and 3A held by Tullow Oil plc for $1,467 million (amount as of January 1, 2010, to which will add costs of interim period). Following this acquisition, TOTAL would become an equal partner with Tullow and CNOOC in the blocks, each with a one-third interest and each being an operator of one of the blocks. Subject to the decision of the Authorities, TOTAL would be the operator of Block 1.Upstream

 

TOTAL announced in November 2012 the finalization of an agreement for the sale in Nigeria of its 20% interest in block OML 138 to a subsidiary of China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec). This transaction remains subject to the

approval by the relevant authorities. At December 31, 2013 the assets and liabilities have been respectively retained in the consolidated balance sheet in “Assets classified as held for sale” for an amount of1,833 million and “Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale” for an amount of590 million. The assets concerned mainly include tangible assets for an amount of1,468 million.

TOTAL announced in February 2012 the signature of an agreement with Sinochem to sell its interests in the Cusiana field and in OAM and ODC pipelines. This transaction is subject to approval by the relevant authorities.

TOTAL has put up for sale its interest in block 15/06 in Angola. At December 31, 2013 the assets and liabilities have been respectively classified in the consolidated balance sheet in “Assets classified as held for sale” for an amount of526 million and “Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale” for an amount of36 million. The assets concerned mainly include tangible assets for an amount of456 million. In February 2014, TOTAL signed an agreement to sell to Sonangol E&P its interest in block 15/06. This transaction remains subject to the approval by the relevant authorities.

 

35)CONSOLIDATION SCOPE

As of December 31, 2010, the sections “Assets classified as held for sale” and “Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale” included the assets and liabilities of Total E&P Cameroun, of Joslyn and of photocure and coatings resins businesses.

35)CONSOLIDATION SCOPE

As of December 31, 2011, 8702013, 898 entities are consolidated of which 783809 are fully consolidated and 8789 are accounted for under the equity method (identified with the letter E)(E).

This simplified organizational chart showsThe table below sets forth the main Group consolidated entities. For each of them, the Group interest is mentioned between brackets. This chart of legal detentions is not exhaustive and does not reflect neither the operational structure nor the relative economic size of the Group entities and the business segments.entities:

 

LOGO
Business segmentStatutory corporate name% Group
interest
MethodCountry of incorporationCountry of operations

UPSTREAM

ABU DHABI GAS LIQUEFACTION COMPANY LTD5.00EUNITED ARAB EMIRATESUNITED ARAB EMIRATES
ANGOLA BLOCK 14 B.V.50.01THE NETHERLANDSANGOLA
ANGOLA LNG LIMITED13.60EBERMUDAANGOLA
BRASS HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED100.00LUXEMBOURGLUXEMBOURG
BRASS LNG LTD17.00ENIGERIANIGERIA
DOLPHIN ENERGY LIMITED24.50EUNITED ARAB EMIRATESUNITED ARAB EMIRATES
E. F. OIL AND GAS LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
ELF EXPLORATION PRODUCTION100.00FRANCEFRANCE
ELF EXPLORATION UK LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
ELF PETROLEUM IRAN100.00FRANCEIRAN
ELF PETROLEUM UK LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
GAZ TRANSPORT & TECHNIGAZ SAS30.00EFRANCEFRANCE
ICHTHYS LNG PTY LTD30.00EAUSTRALIAAUSTRALIA
NIGERIA LNG LTD15.00ENIGERIANIGERIA
NOVATEK16.96ERUSSIARUSSIA
OMAN LNG LLC5.54EOMANOMAN
PETROCEDEÑO30.32EVENEZUELAVENEZUELA
QATAR LIQUEFIED GAS COMPANY LIMITED (II) TRAIN B16.70EQATARQATAR
QATARGAS LIQUEFIED GAS COMPANY LIMITED10.00EQATARQATAR
SHTOKMAN DEVELOPMENT AG25.00ESWITZERLANDRUSSIA
TOTAL (BTC) SARL100.00LUXEMBOURGLUXEMBOURG
TOTAL AUSTRAL100.00FRANCEARGENTINA
TOTAL COAL SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD100.00SOUTH AFRICASOUTH AFRICA
TOTAL COLOMBIA PIPELINE100.00FRANCECOLOMBIA
TOTAL DOLPHIN MIDSTREAM LIMITED100.00BERMUDABERMUDA
TOTAL E&P ABSHERON BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSAZERBAIJAN
TOTAL E&P ALGERIE100.00FRANCEALGERIA
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA100.00FRANCEANGOLA

F-94TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Business segmentStatutory corporate name% Group
interest
MethodCountry of incorporationCountry of operations
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA BLOCK 15/06 LIMITED100.00BERMUDAANGOLA
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA BLOCK 17/06100.00FRANCEANGOLA
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA BLOCK 25100.00FRANCEANGOLA
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA BLOCK 32100.00FRANCEANGOLA
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA BLOCK 33100.00FRANCEANGOLA
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA BLOCK 39100.00FRANCEANGOLA
TOTAL E&P ANGOLA BLOCK 40100.00FRANCEANGOLA
TOTAL E&P ARCTIC RUSSIA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL E&P AUSTRALIA100.00FRANCEAUSTRALIA
TOTAL E&P AUSTRALIA II100.00FRANCEAUSTRALIA
TOTAL E&P AUSTRALIA III100.00FRANCEAUSTRALIA
TOTAL E&P AZERBAIJAN BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSAZERBAIJAN
TOTAL E&P BOLIVIE100.00FRANCEBOLIVIA
TOTAL E&P BORNEO BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSBRUNEI
TOTAL E&P BULGARIA B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSBULGARIA
TOTAL E&P CANADA LTD100.00CANADACANADA
TOTAL E&P CHINE100.00FRANCECHINA
TOTAL E&P COLOMBIE100.00FRANCECOLOMBIA
TOTAL E&P CONGO85.00CONGOCONGO
TOTAL E&P CYPRUS B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSCYPRUS
TOTAL E&P DO BRASIL LTDA100.00BRAZILBRAZIL
TOTAL E&P DOLPHIN UPSTREAM LIMITED100.00BERMUDAQATAR
TOTAL E&P FRANCE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL E&P GOLFE HOLDINGS LIMITED100.00BERMUDABERMUDA
TOTAL E&P GOLFE LIMITED100.00UNITED ARAB EMIRATESQATAR
TOTAL E&P GUYANE FRANCAISE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL E&P ICHTHYS100.00FRANCEAUSTRALIA
TOTAL E&P ICHTHYS B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSAUSTRALIA
TOTAL E&P INDONESIA WEST PAPUA100.00FRANCEINDONESIA
TOTAL E&P INDONESIE100.00FRANCEINDONESIA
TOTAL E&P IRAQ100.00FRANCEIRAQ
TOTAL E&P ITALIA100.00ITALYITALY
TOTAL E&P KAZAKHSTAN100.00FRANCEKAZAKHSTAN
TOTAL E&P KENYA B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSKENYA
TOTAL E&P KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ (HARIR) B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSIRAQ
TOTAL E&P KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ (SAFEN) B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSIRAQ
TOTAL E&P LIBYE100.00FRANCELIBYA
TOTAL E&P MADAGASCAR100.00FRANCEMADAGASCAR
TOTAL E&P MALAYSIA100.00FRANCEMALAYSIA
TOTAL E&P MAROC100.00FRANCEMOROCCO
TOTAL E&P MAURITANIE100.00FRANCEMAURITANIA
TOTAL E&P MAURITANIE BLOCK TA29 B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSMAURITANIA
TOTAL E&P MOZAMBIQUE B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSMOZAMBIQUE
TOTAL E&P MYANMAR100.00FRANCEMYANMAR
TOTAL E&P NEDERLAND BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
TOTAL E&P NIGERIA DEEPWATER D LIMITED100.00NIGERIANIGERIA
TOTAL E&P NIGERIA DEEPWATER E LIMITED100.00NIGERIANIGERIA
TOTAL E&P NIGERIA LTD100.00NIGERIANIGERIA
TOTAL E&P NORGE AS100.00NORWAYNORWAY
TOTAL E&P OMAN100.00FRANCEOMAN
TOTAL E&P QATAR100.00FRANCEQATAR
TOTAL E&P RUSSIE100.00FRANCERUSSIA
TOTAL E&P SOUTH AFRICA BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSSOUTH AFRICA
TOTAL E&P SOUTH EAST MAHAKAM100.00FRANCEINDONESIA
TOTAL E&P SYRIE100.00FRANCESYRIA
TOTAL E&P THAILAND100.00FRANCETHAILAND
TOTAL E&P UGANDA BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSUGANDA
TOTAL E&P UK LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL E&P URUGUAY B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSURUGUAY
TOTAL E&P USA INC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL E&P VIETNAM100.00FRANCEVIETNAM
TOTAL E&P YAMAL100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL E&P YEMEN100.00FRANCEYEMEN
TOTAL ENERGIE GAZ100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL EXPLORATION M’BRIDGE BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSANGOLA
TOTAL EXPLORATION PRODUCTION NIGERIA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL GABON58.28GABONGABON

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-95


Business segmentStatutory corporate name% Group
interest
MethodCountry of incorporationCountry of operations
TOTAL GAS & POWER ACTIFS INDUSTRIELS100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL GAS & POWER NORTH AMERICA INC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL GASANDES100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL GAZ & ELECTRICITE HOLDINGS FRANCE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL GLNG AUSTRALIA100.00FRANCEAUSTRALIA
TOTAL HOLDING DOLPHIN AMONT LIMITED100.00BERMUDABERMUDA
TOTAL HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
TOTAL HOLDINGS NEDERLAND BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
TOTAL LNG ANGOLA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL LNG NIGERIA LTD100.00BERMUDABERMUDA
TOTAL MIDSTREAM HOLDINGS UK LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL OIL AND GAS SOUTH AMERICA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL OIL AND GAS VENEZUELA BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSVENEZUELA
TOTAL PARTICIPATIONS PETROLIERES GABON100.00GABONGABON
TOTAL PETROLEUM ANGOLA100.00FRANCEANGOLA
TOTAL PROFILS PETROLIERS100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL QATAR OIL AND GAS100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL SHTOKMAN BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
TOTAL UPSTREAM NIGERIA LIMITED100.00NIGERIANIGERIA
TOTAL UPSTREAM UK LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL VENEZUELA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL YEMEN LNG COMPANY LIMITED100.00BERMUDABERMUDA
YAMAL LNG33.59ERUSSIARUSSIA
YEMEN LNG COMPANY LTD39.62EBERMUDAYEMEN

REFINING & CHEMICALS

ATLANTIC TRADING & MARKETING INC.100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
ATOTECH (CHINA) CHEMICALS LTD.100.00CHINACHINA
ATOTECH BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
ATOTECH DEUTSCHLAND GMBH100.00GERMANYGERMANY
ATOTECH TAIWAN100.00TAIWANTAIWAN
BASF TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS LLC40.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
BOSTIK HOLDING SA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
BOSTIK INC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
BOSTIK LTD100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
BOSTIK SA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
COSDEN, LLC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
COS-MAR COMPANY50.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
CRAY VALLEY USA, LLC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
CSSA - CHARTERING AND SHIPPING SERVICES SA100.00SWITZERLANDSWITZERLAND
DALIAN WEST PACIFIC PETROCHEMICAL CO LTD (WEPEC)22.41ECHINACHINA
GRANDE PAROISSE SA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
HUTCHINSON ARGENTINA SA100.00ARGENTINAARGENTINA
HUTCHINSON AUTOPARTES DE MEXICO SA.DE CV100.00MEXICOMEXICO
HUTCHINSON CORPORATION100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
HUTCHINSON DO BRASIL SA100.00BRAZILBRAZIL
HUTCHINSON GMBH100.00GERMANYGERMANY
HUTCHINSON POLAND SP ZO.O.100.00POLANDPOLAND
HUTCHINSON SA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
LEGACY SITE SERVICES LLC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
LSS FUNDING INC.100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
NAPHTACHIMIE50.00FRANCEFRANCE
PAULSTRA SNC100.00FRANCEFRANCE
QATAR PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY Q.S.C. (QAPCO)20.00EQATARQATAR
QATOFIN COMPANY LIMITED49.09EQATARQATAR
SAMSUNG TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS CO. LTD50.00ESOUTH KOREASOUTH KOREA
SAUDI ARAMCO TOTAL REFINING AND PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY37.50ESAUDI ARABIASAUDI ARABIA
SIGMAKALON GROUP BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
TOTAL DEUTSCHLAND GMBH *100.00GERMANYGERMANY
TOTAL DOWNSTREAM UK PLC100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL LINDSEY OIL REFINERY LTD100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL OLEFINS ANTWERP100.00BELGIUMBELGIUM
TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & REFINING USA INC *100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & REFINING SA/NV *100.00BELGIUMBELGIUM

F-96TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Business segmentStatutory corporate name% Group
interest
MethodCountry of incorporationCountry of operations
TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS FRANCE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL RAFFINADERIJ ANTWERPEN NV100.00BELGIUMBELGIUM
TOTAL RAFFINAGE CHIMIE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL RAFFINAGE FRANCE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL RAFFINERIE MITTELDEUTSCHLAND GMBH100.00GERMANYGERMANY
TOTAL UK LIMITED *100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTSA TOTAL OIL TRADING SA100.00SWITZERLANDSWITZERLAND
ZEELAND REFINERY N.V.55.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS

MARKETING & SERVICES

AIR TOTAL INTERNATIONAL SA100.00SWITZERLANDSWITZERLAND
AMYRIS INC.17.88EUNITED STATESUNITED STATES
AS 24100.00FRANCEFRANCE
COMPAGNIE PETROLIERE DE L’OUEST- CPO100.00FRANCEFRANCE
SOCIETE ANONYME DE LA RAFFINERIE DES ANTILLES50.00EFRANCEFRANCE
SUNPOWER CORPORATION64.65UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL BELGIUM100.00BELGIUMBELGIUM
TOTAL CHINA INVESTMENT CO LTD100.00CHINACHINA
TOTAL DEUTSCHLAND GMBH *100.00GERMANYGERMANY
TOTAL ENERGIE DEVELOPPEMENT100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL ENERGIES NOUVELLES ACTIVITES USA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL ESPECIALIDADES ARGENTINA100.00ARGENTINAARGENTINA
TOTAL GUINEA ECUATORIAL80.00EQUATORIAL GUINEAEQUATORIAL GUINEA
TOTAL HOLDING ASIE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL KENYA93.96KENYAKENYA
TOTAL LUBRIFIANTS99.98FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL MARKETING MIDDLE EAST FREE ZONE100.00UNITED ARAB EMIRATESUNITED ARAB EMIRATES
TOTAL MARKETING SERVICES100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL MAROC100.00MOROCCOMOROCCO
TOTAL MINERALOEL UND CHEMIE GMBH100.00GERMANYGERMANY
TOTAL OIL TURKIYE AS100.00TURKEYTURKEY
TOTAL OUTRE MER100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL SPECIALTIES USA INC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD50.10SOUTH AFRICASOUTH AFRICA
TOTAL UK LIMITED *100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL VOSTOK100.00RUSSIARUSSIA
TOTALERG SPA49.00EITALYITALY

CORPORATE

ELF AQUITAINE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
ELF AQUITAINE FERTILISANTS100.00FRANCEFRANCE
ELF AQUITAINE INC.100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
OMNIUM REINSURANCE COMPANY SA100.00SWITZERLANDSWITZERLAND
SOCAP SAS100.00FRANCEFRANCE
SOCIETE CIVILE IMMOBILIERE CB2100.00FRANCEFRANCE
SOFAX BANQUE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL CAPITAL100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA LTD.100.00CANADACANADA
TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL DELAWARE INC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL E&P HOLDINGS100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL FINANCE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL FINANCE EXPLOITATION100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL FINANCE GLOBAL SERVICES SA100.00BELGIUMBELGIUM
TOTAL FINANCE USA INC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL FUNDING NEDERLAND BV100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
TOTAL GESTION FILIALES100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL GESTION USA100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL HOLDINGS EUROPE100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL HOLDINGS UK LIMITED100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM
TOTAL HOLDINGS USA INC100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL INTERNATIONAL NV100.00THE NETHERLANDSTHE NETHERLANDS
TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & REFINING USA INC *100.00UNITED STATESUNITED STATES
TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & REFINING SA/NV *100.00BELGIUMBELGIUM
TOTAL SAN/AFRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL TREASURY100.00FRANCEFRANCE
TOTAL UK FINANCE LTD100.00UNITED KINGDOMUNITED KINGDOM

*Multi-segment entities

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.F-97


TOTAL

SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (Unaudited)

 

As from 2009, the amendmentsProved Reserves estimates are calculated according to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X set forth in the “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” release (SEC Release n° 33-8995) and the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update regarding Extractive Activities-OilActivities – Oil and Gas (ASC 932) change a number of reserves estimationwhich provide definitions and disclosure requirements. As a reminder, in terms of reserves estimation, the main changes are: the use of an average price instead of a single year-end price; the use of new reliable technologies to assess proved reserves; and the inclusion, under certain conditions, of non-traditional sources as oil and gas producing activities. The revised rules form the basis of the 2011, 2010 and 2009 year-end estimation of proved reserves.

Preparation of reserves estimates

The estimation of reserves is an ongoing process which is done within affiliates by experienced geoscientists, engineers and economists under the supervision of each affiliate’s General Management. PersonsStaff involved in reserves evaluation are trained to follow SEC-compliant internal guidelines and policies regarding criteria that must be met before reserves can be considered as proved.

The technical validation process relies on a Technical Reserves Committee that is responsible for approving proved reserves changes above a certain threshold and technical evaluations of reserves associated with anyan investment decision that requires approval from the Exploration & Production Executive Committee. The Chairman of the Technical Reserves Committee is appointed by the Senior Management of Exploration & Production and its members represent expertise in reservoir engineering, production geology, production geophysics, drilling, and development studies.

An internal control process related to reserves estimation is well established within TOTAL and involves the following elements:

 

A central Reserve Entity whose responsibility is to consolidate, document and archive the Group’s reserves; to ensure coherence of evaluations worldwide; to maintain the Corporate Reserves Guidelines Standards in line with SEC guidelines and policies; to deliver training on reserves evaluation and classification; and to conduct periodically in-depth technical review of reserves for each affiliate.

evaluation and classification; and to conduct periodically in-depth technical review of reserves for each affiliate.

 

An annual review of affiliates reserves conducted by an internal group of specialists selected for their expertise in geosciences and engineering or their knowledge of the affiliate. All members of this group chaired by the Reserves Vice-presidentVice-President and composed of at least three Technical Reserves Committee members are knowledgeable in the SEC guidelines for proved reserves evaluation. Their responsibility is to provide an independent review of reserves changes proposed by affiliates and ensure that reserves are estimated using appropriate standards and procedures.

 

At the end of the annual review carried out by the Development Division, an SEC Reserves Committee chaired by the Exploration & Production Finance Senior Vice President Corporate Affairs and comprised of the Development, Exploration, Strategy and Legal Senior Vice Presidents, or their representatives, as well as the Chairman of the Technical Reserves Committee and the Reserves Vice-President, approves the SEC reserve booking proposals regarding criteria that are not dependent upon reservoir and geosciences techniques. The results of the annual review and the proposals for including revisions or additions of SEC Proved Reserves are presented to the Exploration & Production Executive Committee for approval before final validation by the Group Executive Management.

are presented to the Exploration & Production Executive Committee for approval before final validation by the Group Executive Management.

The reserves evaluation and control process is audited periodically by the Group’s internal auditors who verify the effectiveness of the reserves evaluation process and control procedures.

The Reservesreserves Vice-President (RVP) is the technical person responsible for preparing the reserves estimates for the Group. Appointed by the President of Exploration & Production, the RVP supervises the Reserve Entity, chairs the annual review of reserves, and is a member of the Technical Reserves Committee and the SEC Reserves Committee. The RVP has over thirty years of experience in the oil & gas industry. He previously held several

management positions in the Group in reservoir engineering and geosciences, and has more than fifteen years of experience in the field of reserves evaluation and control process. He holds an engineering degree from Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Lyon, France, and a petroleum engineering degree from EcoleÉcole Nationale Supérieure du Pétrole et des Moteurs (IFP School), France. He is a past member and past chairmanChairman of the Society of Petroleum EngineeringEngineers Oil and Gas Reserves Committee and a member of the UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) Expert Group on Resource Classification.

Proved developed reserves

At the end of 2013, proved developed reserves of oil and gas were 5,674 Mboe and represented 49% of the proved reserves. At the end of 2012, proved developed reserves of oil and gas were 5,789 Mboe and represented 51% of the proved reserves. At the end of 2011, proved developed reserves of oil and gas were 6,046 Mboe and represented 53% of the proved reserves. At the end of 2010, proved developed reserves of oil and gas were 5,708 Mboe and represented 53% of the proved reserves. At the end of 2009, proved developed reserves of oil and gas were 5,835 Mboe and represented 56% of the proved reserves. Over the past three years, the levelyearly average of proved developed reserves renewal has remained above 5.7 Bboe and over 53% of proved reserves,800 Mboe, illustrating TOTAL’s ability to consistently transfer proved undeveloped reserves into developed status.

Proved undeveloped reserves

As of December 31, 2011,2013, TOTAL’s combined proved undeveloped reserves of oil and gas were 5,3775,852 Mboe as compared to 4,9875,579 Mboe at the end of 2010.2012. The net increase of 390273 Mboe of proved undeveloped reserves is due to the addition of +639946 Mboe of undeveloped reserves related to extensions and discoveries, the revision of -278 Mboe of previous estimates, a net increase of +40144 Mboe due to acquisitions/divestitures, the revision of -168 Mboe of previous estimates (partly resulting from negative price effects), and the transfer of 482439 Mboe from proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves. Negative revision of previous estimates results from a perimeter change in the gas feed of a LNG plant in Africa and the postponement of a debottlenecking phase and a performance study performed on a field located in America. In 2011,2013, the costscost incurred to develop proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) was10.215.0 billion, which represents 84%83% of 20112013 development costs incurred, and was related to projects located for the most part in Angola, Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan,Congo, Gabon, Nigeria, Norway, and United Kingdom and Russia.Kingdom.

Approximately 57%51% of the Group’s proved undeveloped reserves are associated with producing projects and are

located for the

S-1TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


most part in Angola, Canada, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Norway, Russia, and Venezuela. These reserves are expected to be developed over time as part of initial field development plans or additional development phases. The timing to bring these proved reserves into production will depend upon several factors including reservoir performance, surface facilities or plant capacity constraints and contractual limitations on production level. The remaining proved undeveloped reserves correspond to undeveloped fields or assets for which a development has been sanctioned or is in progress.

The Group’s portfolio of projects includes a few large scale and complex developments for which it anticipates that it may take more than five years from the time of recording proved reserves to the start of production. These specific projects represent approximately 26%20% of the Group’s proved undeveloped reserves and include the development of a giant field in Kazakhstan, deep offshore developments in Angola, Nigeria and the United Kingdom and development of oil sands in Canada. These projects are highly complex to develop due to a combination of factors that include, among others, the nature of the reservoir rock and fluid properties, challenging operating

environments and the size of the projects. In addition, some of these projects are generally designed and optimized for a given production capacity that controls the pace at which the field is developed and the wells are drilled. At production start-up, only a portion of the proved reserves are developed in order to deliver sufficient production potential to meet capacity constraints and contractual obligations. The remaining PUD’s associated with the complete development plan will therefore remain undeveloped for more than five years following project approval and booking. Under these specific circumstances, the Group believes that it is justified to report as proved reserves the level of reserves used in connection with the approved project, despite the fact that some of these PUDs may remain undeveloped for more than five years. In addition, TOTAL has demonstrated in recent years the Group’s ability to successfully develop and bring into production similar large scale and complex projects, including the development of deep-offshore fields in Angola, Nigeria, the Republic of Congo, HP/HT fields in the United Kingdom, heavy oil projects in Venezuela and LNG projects in Qatar, Yemen, Nigeria and Indonesia.

 

 

Information shown in the following tables is presented in accordance with the FASB’s ASC 932 and the requirements of the SEC Regulation S-K (Items 1200 to 1208).

The tables provided below are presented by the following geographic areas: Europe, Africa, the Americas, Middle East and Asia (including CIS).

ESTIMATED PROVED RESERVES OF OIL, BITUMEN AND GAS RESERVES

The following tables present, for oil, bitumen and gas reserves, an estimate of the Group’s oil, bitumen and gas quantities by geographic areas as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009. 2011.

Quantities shown concerncorrespond to proved developed and undeveloped reserves together with changes in quantities for 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009.2011.

The definitions used for proved, proved developed and proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are in accordance with the revisedRule 4-10 of SEC Regulation S-X.

All references in the following tables to reserves or production are to the Group’s entire share of such reserves or production. TOTAL’s worldwide proved reserves include the proved reserves of its consolidated subsidiaries as well as its proportionate share of the proved reserves of equity affiliates.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-2


Changes in oil, bitumen and gas reserves

 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Consolidated subsidiaries 

(in million barrels of oil equivalent)

  Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2008

   1,815    3,646    732    530    1,242    7,965  

Revisions of previous estimates

   46    76    14    (7  25    154  

Extensions, discoveries and other

   18    53    284    76        431  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   12        130            142  

Sales of reserves in place

   (2  (43  (14          (59

Production for the year

   (224  (266  (56  (55  (101  (702

Balance as of December 31, 2009

   1,665    3,466    1,090    544    1,166    7,931  

Revisions of previous estimates

   92    200    82    (10  1    365  

Extensions, discoveries and other

   182        18    96    30    326  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   23        425        9    457  

Sales of reserves in place

   (45  (26  (5      (8  (84

Production for the year

   (211  (269  (70  (56  (99  (705

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   1,706    3,371    1,540    574    1,099    8,290  

Revisions of previous estimates

   117    (61  (36  (68  (19  (67

Extensions, discoveries and other

   57    6            588    651  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   44        309        2    355  

Sales of reserves in place

       (65              (65

Production for the year

   (187  (237  (75  (56  (93  (648

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   1,737    3,014    1,738    450    1,577    8,516  

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of

  

    

December 31, 2009

   26    98                124  

December 31, 2010

   26    100                126  

December 31, 2011

       98                98  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Equity affiliates 

(in million barrels of oil equivalent)

  Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2008

       98    527    1,868        2,493  

Revisions of previous estimates

       10    (7  51        54  

Extensions, discoveries and other

               136        136  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                         

Sales of reserves in place

                         

Production for the year

       (8  (18  (105      (131

Balance as of December 31, 2009

       100    502    1,950        2,552  

Revisions of previous estimates

       14    4    (2      16  

Extensions, discoveries and other

                         

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                         

Sales of reserves in place

                         

Production for the year

       (7  (20  (136      (163

Balance as of December 31, 2010

       107    486    1,812        2,405  

Revisions of previous estimates

       (1  (8  (20      (29

Extensions, discoveries and other

                         

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                   779    779  

Sales of reserves in place

       (24  (4  (11      (39

Production for the year

       (4  (18  (152  (35  (209

Balance as of December 31, 2011

       78    456    1,629    744    2,907  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Consolidated subsidiaries 

(in million barrels of oil equivalent)

  Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   1,706    3,371    1,540    574    1,099    8,290  

Revisions of previous estimates

   117    (61  (36  (68  (19  (67

Extensions, discoveries and other

   57    6            588    651  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   44        309        2    355  

Sales of reserves in place

       (65              (65

Production for the year

   (187  (237  (75  (56  (93  (648

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   1,737    3,014    1,738    450    1,577    8,516  

Revisions of previous estimates

   64    65    7    (23  15    128  

Extensions, discoveries and other

   67    173    110    29    43    422  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   32                    32  

Sales of reserves in place

   (38  (71  (8          (117

Production for the year

   (156  (261  (77  (34  (90  (618

Balance as of December 31, 2012

   1,706    2,920    1,770    422    1,545    8,363  

Revisions of previous estimates

   18    (97  44    11    48    24  

Extensions, discoveries and other

   12    20    135    2    227    396  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                   132    132  

Sales of reserves in place

   (51      (51          (102

Production for the year

   (143  (243  (74  (31  (97  (588

Balance as of December 31, 2013

   1,542    2,600    1,824    404    1,855    8,225  

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of

  

     

December 31, 2011

       98                98  

December 31, 2012

       99                99  

December 31, 2013

       159                159  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Equity affiliates 
(in million barrels of oil equivalent)  Europe   Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

        107    486    1,812        2,405  

Revisions of previous estimates

        (1  (8  (20      (29

Extensions, discoveries and other

                          

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                    779    779  

Sales of reserves in place

        (24  (4  (11      (39

Production for the year

        (4  (18  (152  (35  (209

Balance as of December 31, 2011

        78    456    1,629    744    2,907  

Revisions of previous estimates

        2    (39  5    78    46  

Extensions, discoveries and other

                    158    158  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                    118    118  

Sales of reserves in place

                          

Production for the year

            (15  (146  (63  (224

Balance as of December 31, 2012

        80    402    1,488    1,035    3,005  

Revisions of previous estimates

        (3  (141  (3  33    (114

Extensions, discoveries and other

                14    622    636  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                    117    117  

Sales of reserves in place

                    (92  (92

Production for the year

        (1  (13  (164  (73  (251

Balance as of December 31, 2013

        76    248    1,335    1,642    3,301  

   Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates 

(in million barrels of oil equivalent)

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

As of December 31, 2009

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   1,665     3,566     1,592     2,494     1,166     10,483  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,665     3,466     1,090     544     1,166     7,931  

Equity affiliates

        100     502     1,950          2,552  

Proved developed reserves

   1,096     1,775     631     1,918     415     5,835  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,096     1,745     503     482     415     4,241  

Equity affiliates

        30     128     1,436          1,594  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   569     1,791     961     576     751     4,648  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   569     1,721     587     62     751     3,690  

Equity affiliates

        70     374     514          958  

As of December 31, 2010

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   1,706     3,478     2,026     2,386     1,099     10,695  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,706     3,371     1,540     574     1,099     8,290  

Equity affiliates

        107     486     1,812          2,405  

Proved developed reserves

   962     1,692     638     2,055     361     5,708  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   962     1,666     505     427     361     3,921  

Equity affiliates

        26     133     1,628          1,787  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   744     1,786     1,388     331     738     4,987  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   744     1,705     1,035     147     738     4,369  

Equity affiliates

        81     353     184          618  

As of December 31, 2011

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   1,737     3,092     2,194     2,079     2,321     11,423  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,737     3,014     1,738     450     1,577     8,516  

Equity affiliates

        78     456     1,629     744     2,907  

Proved developed reserves

   894     1,660     647     1,869     976     6,046  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   894     1,639     524     371     321     3,749  

Equity affiliates

        21     123     1,498     655     2,297  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   843     1,432     1,547     210     1,345     5,377  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   843     1,375     1,214     79     1,256     4,767  

Equity affiliates

        57     333     131     89     610  

S-3TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


   Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates 
(in million barrels of oil equivalent)  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 
As of December 31, 2011            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   1,737     3,092     2,194     2,079     2,321     11,423  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,737     3,014     1,738     450     1,577     8,516  

Equity affiliates

        78     456     1,629     744     2,907  

Proved developed reserves

   894     1,660     647     1,869     976     6,046  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   894     1,639     524     371     321     3,749  

Equity affiliates

        21     123     1,498     655     2,297  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   843     1,432     1,547     210     1,345     5,377  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   843     1,375     1,214     79     1,256     4,767  

Equity affiliates

        57     333     131     89     610  
As of December 31, 2012            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   1,706     3,000     2,172     1,910     2,580     11,368  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,706     2,920     1,770     422     1,545     8,363  

Equity affiliates

        80     402     1,488     1,035     3,005  

Proved developed reserves

   827     1,584     616     1,718     1,044     5,789  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   827     1,563     475     349     313     3,527  

Equity affiliates

        21     141     1,369     731     2,262  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   879     1,416     1,556     192     1,536     5,579  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   879     1,357     1,295     73     1,232     4,836  

Equity affiliates

        59     261     119     304     743  
As of December 31, 2013            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   1,542     2,676     2,072     1,739     3,497     11,526  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,542     2,600     1,824     404     1,855     8,225  

Equity affiliates

        76     248     1,335     1,642     3,301  

Proved developed reserves

   766     1,469     540     1,577     1,322     5,674  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   766     1,452     452     330     560     3,560  

Equity affiliates

        17     88     1,247     762     2,114  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   776     1,207     1,532     162     2,175     5,852  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   776     1,148     1,372     74     1,295     4,665  

Equity affiliates

        59     160     88     880     1,187  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-4


Changes in oil reserves

The oil reserves for the years prior to 2009 include crude oil, condensates and natural gas liquids (condensates, LPG) and bitumen reserves. Bitumen reserves as from 2009 are shown separately.liquids.

 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Consolidated subsidiaries   Consolidated subsidiaries 
  Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

(in million barrels)

   

Balance as of December 31, 2008

   798    2,597    252    225    538    4,410  

Revisions of previous estimates

   34    92    (170  (4  51    3  

Extensions, discoveries and other

   8    38    22    1        69  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   1                    1  

Sales of reserves in place

       (44  (1          (45

Production for the year

   (108  (223  (15  (34  (17  (397

Balance as of December 31, 2009

   733    2,460    88    188    572    4,041  

Revisions of previous estimates

   46    131    7    (2      182  

Extensions, discoveries and other

   146        2    82    4    234  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   2                    2  

Sales of reserves in place

   (37  (23  (2      (7  (69

Production for the year

   (98  (218  (16  (29  (15  (376
(in millions of barrels)  Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   792    2,350    79    239    554    4,014     792    2,350    79    239    554    4,014  

Revisions of previous estimates

   49    (19  9    (33  (24  (18   49    (19  9    (33  (24  (18

Extensions, discoveries and other

   17    6            58    81     17    6    

  
      58    81  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

   42                    42     42                    42  

Sales of reserves in place

       (57              (57       (57              (57

Production for the year

   (88  (185  (15  (25  (15  (328   (88  (185  (15  (25  (15  (328

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   812    2,095    73    181    573    3,734     812    2,095    73    181    573    3,734  

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of

       

December 31, 2009

   12    88                100  

December 31, 2010

   11    89                100  

December 31, 2011

       88                88  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Equity affiliates 
  Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

(in million barrels)

   

Balance as of December 31, 2008

       58    508    719        1,285  

Revisions of previous estimates

       (14  (5  (15      (34   20    61    10    2    10    103  

Extensions, discoveries and other

               136        136     27    148    8    28    6    217  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                            7                    7  

Sales of reserves in place

                            (32  (45  (2          (79

Production for the year

       (7  (18  (79      (104   (72  (210  (12  (21  (14  (329

Balance as of December 31, 2009

       37    485    761        1,283  

Balance as of December 31, 2012

   762    2,049    77    190    575    3,653  

Revisions of previous estimates

       4    4    3        11     19    50    7    7    75    158  

Extensions, discoveries and other

                            6    19    20    2    21    68  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                                            34    34  

Sales of reserves in place

                            (49      (6          (55

Production for the year

       (7  (19  (84      (110   (60  (194  (12  (20  (16  (302

Balance as of December 31, 2013

   678    1,924    86    179    689    3,556  

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped
reserves as of

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped
reserves as of

   

     

December 31, 2011

       88                88  

December 31, 2012

       87                87  

December 31, 2013

       140                140  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Equity affiliates 
(in millions of barrels)  Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

       34    470    680        1,184         34    470    680        1,184  

Revisions of previous estimates

       2    (6  (12      (16       2    (6  (12      (16

Extensions, discoveries and other

                                                  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                   51    51                     51    51  

Sales of reserves in place

       (22  (4  (12      (38       (22  (4  (12      (38

Production for the year

       (4  (17  (91  (3  (115       (4  (17  (91  (3  (115

Balance as of December 31, 2011

       10    443    565    48    1,066         10    443    565    48    1,066  

Revisions of previous estimates

       5    (40  5    9    (21

Extensions, discoveries and other

                   51    51  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                   11    11  

Sales of reserves in place

                         

Production for the year

           (15  (93  (5  (113

Balance as of December 31, 2012

       15    388    477    114    994  

Revisions of previous estimates

       (3  (138  (6  (4  (151

Extensions, discoveries and other

                   32    32  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                   13    13  

Sales of reserves in place

                         

Production for the year

           (13  (99  (7  (119)��

Balance as of December 31, 2013

       12    237    372    148    769  

   Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates 
   Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

(in million barrels)

            

As of December 31, 2009

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   733     2,497     573     949     572     5,324  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   733     2,460     88     188     572     4,041  

Equity affiliates

        37     485     761          1,283  

Proved developed reserves

   457     1,331     187     728     65     2,768  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   457     1,303     66     174     65     2,065  

Equity affiliates

        28     121     554          703  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   276     1,166     386     221     507     2,556  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   276     1,157     22     14     507     1,976  

Equity affiliates

        9     364     207          580  

As of December 31, 2010

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   792     2,384     549     919     554     5,198  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   792     2,350     79     239     554     4,014  

Equity affiliates

        34     470     680          1,184  

Proved developed reserves

   394     1,250     180     662     58     2,544  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   394     1,226     53     151     58     1,882  

Equity affiliates

        24     127     511          662  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   398     1,134     369     257     496     2,654  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   398     1,124     26     88     496     2,132  

Equity affiliates

        10     343     169          522  

As of December 31, 2011

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   812     2,105     516     746     621     4,800  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   812     2,095     73     181     573     3,734  

Equity affiliates

        10     443     565     48     1,066  

Proved developed reserves

   351     1,206     165     565     91     2,378  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   351     1,202     48     116     50     1,767  

Equity affiliates

        4     117     449     41     611  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   461     899     351     181     530     2,422  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   461     893     25     65     523     1,967  

Equity affiliates

        6     326     116     7     455  

S-5TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


   Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates 
(in millions of barrels)  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

As of December 31, 2011

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   812     2,105     516     746     621     4,800  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   812     2,095     73     181     573     3,734  

Equity affiliates

        10     443     565     48     1,066  

Proved developed reserves

   351     1,206     165     565     91     2,378  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   351     1,202     48     116     50     1,767  

Equity affiliates

        4     117     449     41     611  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   461     899     351     181     530     2,422  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   461     893     25     65     523     1,967  

Equity affiliates

        6     326     116     7     455  

As of December 31, 2012

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   761     2,065     465     667     689     4,647  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   761     2,050     77     190     575     3,653  

Equity affiliates

        15     388     477     114     994  

Proved developed reserves

   289     1,145     179     506     110     2,229  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   289     1,139     44     133     55     1,660  

Equity affiliates

        6     135     373     55     569  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   472     920     286     161     579     2,418  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   472     911     33     57     520     1,993  

Equity affiliates

        9     253     104     59     425  

As of December 31, 2013

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   678     1,936     323     551     837     4,325  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   678     1,924     86     179     689     3,556  

Equity affiliates

        12     237     372     148     769  

Proved developed reserves

   274     1,068     128     419     304     2,193  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   274     1,064     45     119     235     1,737  

Equity affiliates

        4     83     300     69     456  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   404     868     195     132     533     2,132  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   404     860     41     60     454     1,819  

Equity affiliates

        8     154     72     79     313  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-6


Changes in bitumen reserves

Bitumen reserves as of December 31, 2008 and before are included in oil reserves presented in the table “Changes in oil reserves”.

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  Consolidated subsidiaries   Consolidated subsidiaries 

(in million barrels)

  Europe   Africa   Americas Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2008

                             

Revisions of previous estimates

             176              176  

Extensions, discoveries and other

             192              192  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                             

Sales of reserves in place

                             

Production for the year

             (3            (3

Balance as of December 31, 2009

             365              365  

Revisions of previous estimates

             3              3  

Extensions, discoveries and other

                             

Acquisitions of reserves in place

             425              425  

Sales of reserves in place

                             

Production for the year

             (4            (4
(in millions of barrels)  Europe   Africa   Americas Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

             789              789               789              789  

Revisions of previous estimates

             (109            (109             (109            (109

Extensions, discoveries and other

                                                          

Acquisitions of reserves in place

             308              308               308              308  

Sales of reserves in place

                                                          

Production for the year

             (4            (4             (4            (4

Balance as of December 31, 2011

             984              984               984              984  

Revisions of previous estimates

             43              43  

Extensions, discoveries and other

             15              15  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                             

Sales of reserves in place

                             

Production for the year

             (4            (4

Balance as of December 31, 2012

             1,038              1,038  

Revisions of previous estimates

             2              2  

Extensions, discoveries and other

             53              53  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                             

Sales of reserves in place

                             

Production for the year

             (5            (5

Balance as of December 31, 2013

             1,088              1,088  

Proved developed reserves as of

                      

December 31, 2009

             19              19  

December 31, 2010

             18              18  

December 31, 2011

             21              21               21              21  

December 31, 2012

             18              18  

December 31, 2013

             15              15  

Proved undeveloped reserves as of

                      

December 31, 2009

             346              346  

December 31, 2010

             771              771  

December 31, 2011

             963              963               963              963  

December 31, 2012

             1,020              1,020  

December 31, 2013

             1,073              1,073  

There are no bitumen reserves for equity affiliates.

There are no minority interests for bitumen reserves.

S-7TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


Changes in gas reserves

 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves Consolidated subsidiaries  Consolidated subsidiaries 

(in billion cubic feet)

 Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total  Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2008

  5,507    5,529    2,714    1,769    4,098    19,617  

Revisions of previous estimates

  73    (127  25    (18  (165  (212

Extensions, discoveries and other

  55    61    382    399        897  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

  58        752            810  

Sales of reserves in place

  (13      (64          (77

Production for the year

  (633  (217  (212  (122  (467  (1,651

Balance as of December 31, 2009

  5,047    5,246    3,597    2,028    3,466    19,384  

Revisions of previous estimates

  271    346    415    (80  15    967  

Extensions, discoveries and other

  193        88    70    138    489  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

  111                51    162  

Sales of reserves in place

  (43  (20  (16      (4  (83

Production for the year

  (617  (258  (278  (151  (472  (1,776

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  4,962    5,314    3,806    1,867    3,194    19,143    4,962    5,314    3,806    1,867    3,194    19,143  

Revisions of previous estimates

  358    (216  367    (180  1    330    358    (216  367    (180  1    330  

Extensions, discoveries and other

  211                2,824    3,035    211                2,824    3,035  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

  11        7        13    31    11        7        13    31  

Sales of reserves in place

      (46              (46      (46              (46

Production for the year

  (528  (259  (317  (169  (445  (1,718  (528  (259  (317  (169  (445  (1,718

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  5,014    4,793    3,863    1,518    5,587    20,775    5,014    4,793    3,863    1,518    5,587    20,775  

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of

  

December 31, 2009

  73    60                133  

December 31, 2010

  83    67                150  

December 31, 2011

      62                62  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves Equity affiliates 

(in billion cubic feet)

 Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2008

      215    110    6,276        6,601  

Revisions of previous estimates

      127    (13  363        477    268    31    (278  (132  15    (96

Extensions, discoveries and other

                          216    127    478    6    195    1,022  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                          138                    138  

Sales of reserves in place

                          (30  (173  (35          (238

Production for the year

      (1  (2  (141      (144  (462  (257  (337  (75  (433  (1,564

Balance as of December 31, 2009

      341    95    6,498        6,934  

Balance as of December 31, 2012

  5,144    4,521    3,691    1,317    5,364    20,037  

Revisions of previous estimates

      50    (2  (52      (4  (6  (887  199    29    (186  (851

Extensions, discoveries and other

                          27    12    336        1,074    1,449  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                          1                506    507  

Sales of reserves in place

                          (13      (243          (256

Production for the year

      (1  (2  (282      (285  (450  (248  (320  (68  (458  (1,544

Balance as of December 31, 2013

  4,703    3,398    3,663    1,278    6,300    19,342  

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of

Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of

  

December 31, 2011

      62                62  

December 31, 2012

      57                57  

December 31, 2013

      87                87  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves Equity affiliates 
(in billion cubic feet) Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

      390    91    6,164        6,645        390    91    6,164        6,645  

Revisions of previous estimates

      (16  (10  (31      (57      (16  (10  (31      (57

Extensions, discoveries and other

                                                

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                  3,865    3,865                    3,865    3,865  

Sales of reserves in place

      (10              (10      (10              (10

Production for the year

      (1  (2  (331  (167  (501      (1  (2  (331  (167  (501

Balance as of December 31, 2011

      363    79    5,802    3,698    9,942        363    79    5,802    3,698    9,942  

Revisions of previous estimates

      (21  5    (4  366    346  

Extensions, discoveries and other

                  578    578  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                  568    568  

Sales of reserves in place

                        

Production for the year

      (1  (2  (287  (304  (594

Balance as of December 31, 2012

      341    82    5,511    4,906    10,840  

Revisions of previous estimates

      8    (18  16    191    197  

Extensions, discoveries and other

              77    3,209    3,286  

Acquisitions of reserves in place

                  553    553  

Sales of reserves in place

                  (485  (485

Production for the year

      (6  (2  (354  (345  (707

Balance as of December 31, 2013

      343    62    5,250    8,029    13,684  

   Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates 

(in billion cubic feet)

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

As of December 31, 2009

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   5,047     5,587     3,692     8,526     3,466     26,318  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   5,047     5,246     3,597     2,028     3,466     19,384  

Equity affiliates

        341     95     6,498          6,934  

Proved developed reserves

   3,463     2,272     2,388     6,606     2,059     16,788  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   3,463     2,261     2,343     1,773     2,059     11,899  

Equity affiliates

        11     45     4,833          4,889  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   1,584     3,315     1,304     1,920     1,407     9,530  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,584     2,985     1,254     255     1,407     7,485  

Equity affiliates

        330     50     1,665          2,045  

As of December 31, 2010

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   4,962     5,704     3,897     8,031     3,194     25,788  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   4,962     5,314     3,806     1,867     3,194     19,143  

Equity affiliates

        390     91     6,164          6,645  

Proved developed reserves

   3,089     2,240     2,474     7,649     1,790     17,242  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   3,089     2,229     2,439     1,578     1,790     11,125  

Equity affiliates

        11     35     6,071          6,117  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   1,873     3,464     1,423     382     1,404     8,546  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   1,873     3,085     1,367     289     1,404     8,018  

Equity affiliates

        379     56     93          528  

As of December 31, 2011

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   5,014     5,156     3,942     7,320     9,285     30,717  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   5,014     4,793     3,863     1,518     5,587     20,775  

Equity affiliates

        363     79     5,802     3,698     9,942  

Proved developed reserves

   2,943     2,308     2,600     7,170     4,854     19,875  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,943     2,216     2,567     1,450     1,594     10,770  

Equity affiliates

        92     33     5,720     3,260     9,105  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   2,071     2,848     1,342     150     4,431     10,842  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,071     2,577     1,296     68     3,993     10,005  

Equity affiliates

        271     46     82     438     837  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-8


   Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates 
(in billion cubic feet)  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

As of December 31, 2011

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   5,014     5,156     3,942     7,320     9,285     30,717  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   5,014     4,793     3,863     1,518     5,587     20,775  

Equity affiliates

        363     79     5,802     3,698     9,942  

Proved developed reserves

   2,943     2,308     2,600     7,170     4,854     19,875  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,943     2,216     2,567     1,450     1,594     10,770  

Equity affiliates

        92     33     5,720     3,260     9,105  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   2,071     2,848     1,342     150     4,431     10,842  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,071     2,577     1,296     68     3,993     10,005  

Equity affiliates

        271     46     82     438     837  

As of December 31, 2012

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   5,144     4,862     3,773     6,828     10,270     30,877  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   5,144     4,521     3,691     1,317     5,364     20,037  

Equity affiliates

        341     82     5,511     4,906     10,840  

Proved developed reserves

   2,927     2,192     2,356     6,656     5,115     19,246  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,927     2,110     2,316     1,240     1,526     10,119  

Equity affiliates

        82     40     5,416     3,589     9,127  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   2,217     2,670     1,417     172     5,155     11,631  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,217     2,411     1,375     77     3,838     9,918  

Equity affiliates

        259     42     95     1,317     1,713  

As of December 31, 2013

            

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

   4,703     3,741     3,725     6,528     14,329     33,026  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   4,703     3,398     3,663     1,278     6,300     19,342  

Equity affiliates

        343     62     5,250     8,029     13,684  

Proved developed reserves

   2,687     2,009     2,240     6,366     5,514     18,816  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,687     1,937     2,210     1,210     1,834     9,878  

Equity affiliates

        72     30     5,156     3,680     8,938  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   2,016     1,732     1,485     162     8,815     14,210  

Consolidated subsidiaries

   2,016     1,461     1,453     68     4,466     9,464  

Equity affiliates

        271     32     94     4,349     4,746  

S-9TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES

The following tables do not include revenues and expenses related to oil and gas transportation activities and LNG liquefaction and transportation activities.

 

  Consolidated subsidiaries   Consolidated subsidiaries 

(M)

  Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

2009

       

Non-Group sales

   2,499    1,994    583    859    1,926    7,861  
Group sales   4,728    7,423    310    556    597    13,614  

Total Revenues

   7,227    9,417    893    1,415    2,523    21,475  

Production costs

   (1,155  (1,122  (193  (204  (243  (2,917

Exploration expenses

   (160  (265  (121  (81  (70  (697

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

   (1,489  (1,471  (262  (314  (613  (4,149

Other expenses(a)

   (261  (895  (181  (170  (56  (1,563

Pre-tax income from producing activities

   4,162    5,664    136    646    1,541    12,149  

Income tax

   (2,948  (3,427  (103  (309  (747  (7,534

Results of oil and gas producing activities

   1,214    2,237    33    337    794    4,615  

2010

       
Non-Group sales   2,839    2,639    628    1,038    2,540    9,684  
Group sales   5,599    9,894    540    644    683    17,360  

Total Revenues

   8,438    12,533    1,168    1,682    3,223    27,044  

Production costs

   (1,281  (1,187  (222  (259  (279  (3,228

Exploration expenses

   (266  (275  (216  (8  (99  (864

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

   (1,404  (1,848  (368  (264  (830  (4,714

Other expenses(a)

   (299  (1,014  (218  (241  (72  (1,844

Pre-tax income from producing activities

   5,188    8,209    144    910    1,943    16,394  

Income tax

   (3,237  (5,068  (83  (402  (950  (9,740

Results of oil and gas producing activities

   1,951    3,141    61    508    993    6,654  
(in millions of euros)  Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

2011

          
Non-Group sales   3,116    3,188    776    1,159    3,201    11,440     3,116    3,188    776    1,159    3,201    11,440  
Group sales   7,057    11,365    764    737    712    20,635     7,057    11,365    764    737    712    20,635  

Total Revenues

   10,173    14,553    1,540    1,896    3,913    32,075     10,173    14,553    1,540    1,896    3,913    32,075  

Production costs

   (1,235  (1,179  (250  (286  (304  (3,254   (1,235  (1,179  (250  (286  (304  (3,254

Exploration expenses

   (343  (323  (48  (11  (294  (1,019   (343  (323  (48  (11  (294  (1,019

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

   (1,336  (1,845  (352  (278  (791  (4,602   (1,336  (1,845  (352  (278  (791  (4,602

Other expenses(a)

   (307  (1,181  (274  (276  (95  (2,133

Other expenses(a)

   (307  (1,181  (274  (276  (95  (2,133

Pre-tax income from producing activities

   6,952    10,025    616    1,045    2,429    21,067     6,952    10,025    616    1,045    2,429    21,067  

Income tax

   (5,059  (6,484  (293  (465  (1,302  (13,603   (5,059  (6,484  (293  (465  (1,302  (13,603

Results of oil and gas producing activities

   1,893    3,541    323    580    1,127    7,464     1,893    3,541    323    580    1,127    7,464  

2012

       
Non-Group sales   1,986    4,388    968    723    3,509    11,574  
Group sales   6,857    13,440    639    1,010    790    22,736  

Total Revenues

   8,843    17,828    1,607    1,733    4,299    34,310  

Production costs

   (1,318  (1,442  (297  (340  (395  (3,792

Exploration expenses

   (483  (365  (339  (18  (241  (1,446

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

   (1,986  (2,574  (1,558  (458  (938  (7,514

Other expenses(a)

   (326  (1,356  (386  (159  (128  (2,355

Pre-tax income from producing activities

   4,730    12,091    (973  758    2,597    19,203  

Income tax

   (3,478  (7,383  226    (386  (1,264  (12,285

Results of oil and gas producing activities

   1,252    4,708    (747  372    1,333    6,918  

2013

   
Non-Group sales   1,634    3,445    1,003    812    3,483    10,377  
Group sales   5,834    12,101    608    679    761    19,983  

Total Revenues

   7,468    15,546    1,611    1,491    4,244    30,360  

Production costs

   (1,327  (1,486  (313  (375  (440  (3,941

Exploration expenses

   (363  (439  (406  (124  (301  (1,633

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

   (1,368  (2,585  (914  (546  (1,274  (6,687

Other expenses(a)

   (371  (1,188  (327  (80  (137  (2,103

Pre-tax income from producing activities

   4,039    9,848    (349  366    2,092    15,996  

Income tax

   (2,726  (6,235  42    (316  (1,061  (10,296

Results of oil and gas producing activities

   1,313    3,613    (307  50    1,031    5,700  

 

(a)Included production taxes and accretion expense as provided for by IAS 37 (271 million in 2009,326 million in 2010 and338 million in 2011)2011,391 million in 2012,426 million in 2013).

   Equity affiliates 

(M)

  Europe   Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

2009

        

Non-Group sales

        203    528    231        962  
Group sales                3,382        3,382  

Total Revenues

        203    528    3,613        4,344  

Production costs

        (31  (41  (271      (343

Exploration expenses

            (17          (17

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

        (42  (73  (247      (362

Other expenses

        (9  (205  (2,800      (3,014

Pre-tax income from producing activities

        121    192    295        608  

Income tax

        (93  (74  (101      (268

Results of oil and gas producing activities

        28    118    194        340  

2010

        
Non-Group sales        148    120    596        864  

Group sales

        3    565    4,646        5,214  

Total Revenues

        151    685    5,242        6,078  

Production costs

        (44  (53  (195  (1  (293

Exploration expenses

        (7  (23          (30

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

        (44  (89  (259      (392

Other expenses

            (268  (4,034      (4,302

Pre-tax income from producing activities

        56    252    754    (1  1,061  

Income tax

            (44  (142      (186

Results of oil and gas producing activities

        56    208    612    (1  875  

2011

        

Non-Group sales

        26    15    1,080    256    1,377  

Group sales

            831    6,804        7,635  

Total Revenues

        26    846    7,884    256    9,012  

Production costs

        (7  (48  (250  (28  (333

Exploration expenses

                    (4  (4

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

        (7  (44  (225  (109  (385

Other expenses

            (550  (6,101  (36  (6,687

Pre-tax income from producing activities

        12    204    1,308    79    1,603  

Income tax

            (95  (285  (34  (414

Results of oil and gas producing activities

        12    109    1,023    45    1,189  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-10


   Equity affiliates 
(in millions of euros)  Europe   Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

2011

        

Non-Group sales

        26    15    1,080    256    1,377  
Group sales            831    6,804        7,635  

Total Revenues

        26    846    7,884    256    9,012  

Production costs

        (7  (48  (250  (28  (333

Exploration expenses

                    (4  (4

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

        (7  (44  (225  (109  (385

Other expenses

            (550  (6,101  (36  (6,687

Pre-tax income from producing activities

        12    204    1,308    79    1,603  

Income tax

            (95  (285  (34  (414

Results of oil and gas producing activities

        12    109    1,023    45    1,189  

2012

        
Non-Group sales                1,085    780    1,865  

Group sales

            1,234    7,850    (323  8,761  

Total Revenues

            1,234    8,935    457    10,626  

Production costs

            (125  (289  (88  (502

Exploration expenses

                    (3  (3

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

            (60  (299  (227  (586

Other expenses

            (754  (6,924  (54  (7,732

Pre-tax income from producing activities

            295    1,423    85    1,803  

Income tax

            (63  (303  (51  (417

Results of oil and gas producing activities

            232    1,120    34    1,386  

2013

        

Non-Group sales

                1,521    569    2,090  

Group sales

            752    7,748    10    8,510  

Total Revenues

            752  �� 9,269    579    10,600  

Production costs

            (81  (362  (41  (484

Exploration expenses

                    (2  (2

Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances

            (34  (350  (194  (578

Other expenses

            (481  (6,741  (91  (7,313

Pre-tax income from producing activities

            156    1,816    251    2,223  

Income tax

            (77  (410  (83  (570

Results of oil and gas producing activities

            79    1,406    168    1,653  

S-11TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


COST INCURRED

The following tables set forth the costs incurred in the Group’s oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities, including both capitalized and expensed amounts. They do not include costs incurred related to oil and gas transportation and LNG liquefaction and transportation activities.

 

   Consolidated subsidiaries 

(M)

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2009

            

Proved property acquisition

   71     45     1,551     105          1,772  

Unproved property acquisition

   26     8     403          21     458  

Exploration costs

   284     475     222     87     123     1,191  

Development costs(a)

   1,658     3,288     618     250     1,852     7,666  

Total cost incurred

   2,039     3,816     2,794     442     1,996     11,087  

2010

            

Proved property acquisition

   162     137     26     139     21     485  

Unproved property acquisition

   5     124     1,186     8     619     1,942  

Exploration costs

   361     407     276     17     250     1,311  

Development costs(a)

   1,565     3,105     718     247     2,007     7,642  

Total cost incurred

   2,093     3,773     2,206     411     2,897     11,380  

2011

            

Proved property acquisition

   298     10     413     2     251     974  

Unproved property acquisition

   1     397     1,692     3     14     2,107  

Exploration costs

   505     384     239     17     417     1,562  

Development costs(a)

   2,352     3,895     1,329     329     2,823     10,728  

Total cost incurred

   3,156     4,686     3,673     351     3,505     15,371  

  Equity affiliates   Consolidated subsidiaries 

(M)

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2009

            

Proved property acquisition

                              

Unproved property acquisition

                              

Exploration costs

             22     3          25  

Development costs(a)

        28     93     293     23     437  

Total cost incurred

        28     115     296     23     462  

2010

            

Proved property acquisition

                              

Unproved property acquisition

                              

Exploration costs

        4     30     4          38  

Development costs(a)

        20     99     476     73     668  

Total cost incurred

        24     129     480     73     706  

(in millions of euros)

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia Total 

2011

                       

Proved property acquisition

                       2,691     2,691     298     10     413     2     251    974  

Unproved property acquisition

                       1,116     1,116     1     397     1,692     3     14    2,107  

Exploration costs

             2               2��    505     384     254     17     417    1,577  

Development costs(a)

        2     106     314     939     1,361     2,352     3,895     1,314     329     2,823    10,713  

Total cost incurred

        2     108     314     4,746     5,170     3,156     4,686     3,673     351     3,505    15,371  

2012

           

Proved property acquisition

   202     27               12    241  

Unproved property acquisition

   40     1,362     384     176     26    1,988  

Exploration costs

   598     578     571     35     340    2,122  

Development costs(a)

   3,183     4,330     1,830     307     3,331    12,981  

Total cost incurred

   4,023     6,297     2,785     518     3,709    17,332  

2013

           

Proved property acquisition

        131          2     367    500  

Unproved property acquisition

   13     386     1,584     64     64    2,111  

Exploration costs

   511     669     441     174     408    2,203  

Development costs(a)

   3,945     6,434     2,403     349     4,212    17,343  

Total cost incurred

   4,469     7,620     4,428     589     5,051    22,157  
  Equity affiliates 

(in millions of euros)

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia Total 

2011

           

Proved property acquisition

                       2,691    2,691  

Unproved property acquisition

                       1,116    1,116  

Exploration costs

             2              2  

Development costs(a)

        2     106     314     939    1,361  

Total cost incurred

        2     108     314     4,746    5,170  

2012

           

Proved property acquisition

                       238    238  

Unproved property acquisition

                       (22  (22

Exploration costs

                             

Development costs(a)

             167     380     202    749  

Total cost incurred

             167     380     418    965  

2013

           

Proved property acquisition

                       206    206  

Unproved property acquisition

                       106    106  

Exploration costs

                             

Development costs(a)

             128     345     241    714  

Total cost incurred

             128     345     553    1,026  

 

(a)

Including asset retirement costs capitalized during the year and any gains or losses recognized upon settlement of asset retirement obligation during the year.

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-12


CAPITALIZED COSTS RELATED TO OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES

Capitalized costs represent the amounts of capitalized proved and unproved property costs, including support equipment and facilities, along with the related accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization. The following tables do not include capitalized costs related to oil and gas transportation and LNG liquefaction and transportation activities.

 

  Consolidated subsidiaries   Consolidated subsidiaries 

(M)

  Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 
As of December 31, 2009       

Proved properties

   30,613    27,557    7,123    5,148    10,102    80,543  

Unproved properties

   337    1,138    839    30    555    2,899  

Total capitalized costs

   30,950    28,695    7,962    5,178    10,657    83,442  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (21,870  (13,510  (2,214  (3,325  (3,085  (44,004

Net capitalized costs

   9,080    15,185    5,748    1,853    7,572    39,438  

As of December 31, 2010

       

Proved properties

   31,735    32,494    7,588    5,715    12,750    90,282  

Unproved properties

   402    1,458    2,142    49    1,433    5,484  

Total capitalized costs

   32,137    33,952    9,730    5,764    14,183    95,766  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (23,006  (16,716  (2,302  (3,849  (4,092  (49,965

Net capitalized costs

   9,131    17,236    7,428    1,915    10,091    45,801  

(in millions of euros)

  Europe Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

As of December 31, 2011

              

Proved properties

   34,308    37,032    8,812    6,229    17,079    103,460     34,308    37,032    8,812    6,229    17,079    103,460  

Unproved properties

   460    1,962    4,179    62    911    7,574     460    1,962    4,179    62    911    7,574  

Total capitalized costs

   34,768    38,994    12,991    6,291    17,990    111,034     34,768    38,994    12,991    6,291    17,990    111,034  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (24,047  (18,642  (2,294  (4,274  (5,066  (54,323   (24,047  (18,642  (2,294  (4,274  (5,066  (54,323

Net capitalized costs

   10,721    20,352    10,697    2,017    12,924    56,711     10,721    20,352    10,697    2,017    12,924    56,711  

As of December 31, 2012

       

Proved properties

   35,456    40,562    10,108    6,408    20,463    112,997  

Unproved properties

   543    3,184    4,324    248    612    8,911  

Total capitalized costs

   35,999    43,746    14,432    6,656    21,075    121,908  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (23,660  (20,364  (3,219  (4,648  (5,872  (57,763

Net capitalized costs

   12,339    23,382    11,213    2,008    15,203    64,145  

As of December 31, 2013

       

Proved properties

   36,482    44,760    10,878    6,483    23,869    122,472  

Unproved properties

   644    3,661    5,715    349    814    11,183  

Total capitalized costs

   37,126    48,421    16,593    6,832    24,683    133,655  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (23,354  (21,955  (3,814  (4,961  (6,844  (60,928

Net capitalized costs

   13,772    26,466    12,779    1,871    17,839    72,727  

 

  Equity affiliates    Equity affiliates  

(M)

  Europe   Africa Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

As of December 31, 2009

        

Proved properties

        610    726    2,404        3,740  

Unproved properties

            135        62    197  

Total capitalized costs

        610    861    2,404    62    3,937  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

        (387  (171  (1,723      (2,281

Net capitalized costs

        223    690    681    62    1,656  

As of December 31, 2010

        

Proved properties

        639    887    3,110        4,636  

Unproved properties

        25    168        138    331  

Total capitalized costs

        664    1,055    3,110    138    4,967  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

        (462  (307  (2,029      (2,798

Net capitalized costs

        202    748    1,081    138    2,169  

(in millions of euros)

  Europe   Africa   Americas Middle
East
 Asia Total 

As of December 31, 2011

                 

Proved properties

            731    3,496    3,973    8,200               731    3,496    3,973    8,200  

Unproved properties

                    1,146    1,146                       1,146    1,146  

Total capitalized costs

            731    3,496    5,119    9,346               731    3,496    5,119    9,346  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

            (96  (2,337  (213  (2,646             (96  (2,337  (213  (2,646

Net capitalized costs

            635    1,159    4,906    6,700               635    1,159    4,906    6,700  

As of December 31, 2012

         

Proved properties

             1,049    3,637    4,074    8,760  

Unproved properties

                     1,118    1,118  

Total capitalized costs

             1,049    3,637    5,192    9,878  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

             (177  (2,540  (457  (3,174

Net capitalized costs

             872    1,097    4,735    6,704  

As of December 31, 2013

         

Proved properties

             891    3,939    4,567    9,397  

Unproved properties

                     1,224    1,224  

Total capitalized costs

             891    3,939    5,791    10,621  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

             (161  (2,911  (646  (3,718

Net capitalized costs

             730    1,028    5,145    6,903  

S-13TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF

DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS

(EXCLUDING TRANSPORTATION)

 

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserve quantities was developed as follows:

 

estimates of proved reserves and the corresponding production profiles are based on existing technical and economic conditions;

 

the estimated future cash flows are determined based on prices used in estimating the Group’s proved oil and gas reserves;

 

the future cash flows incorporate estimated production costs (including production taxes), future development costs and asset retirement costs. All cost estimates are based on year-end technical and economic conditions;

future income taxes are computed by applying the year-end statutory tax rate to future net cash flows after consideration of permanent differences and future income tax credits; and

 

future net cash flows are discounted at a standard discount rate of 10%.10 percent.

These principles applied are those required by ASC 932 and do not reflect the expectations of real revenues from these reserves, nor their present value; hence, they do not constitute criteria for investment decisions. An estimate of the fair value of reserves should also take into account, among other things, the recovery of reserves not presently classified as proved, anticipated future changes in prices and costs and a discount factor more representative of the time value of money and the risks inherent in reserves estimates.

 

  Consolidated subsidiaries 

(in millions of euros)

 Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

As of December 31, 2011

      

Future cash inflows

  85,919    167,367    53,578    14,297    67,868    389,029  

Future production costs

  (18,787  (31,741  (22,713  (3,962  (12,646  (89,849

Future development costs

  (21,631  (22,776  (11,548  (3,110  (11,044  (70,109

Future income taxes

  (28,075  (71,049  (4,361  (2,794  (12,963  (119,242

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

  17,426    41,801    14,956    4,431    31,215    109,829  

Discount at 10%

  (9,426  (17,789  (12,298  (2,186  (20,717  (62,416

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  8,000    24,012    2,658    2,245    10,498    47,413  

As of December 31, 2012

      

Future cash inflows

  93,215    177,392    58,140    16,474    70,985    416,206  

Future production costs

  (20,337  (39,091  (25,824  (5,213  (15,218  (105,683

Future development costs

  (24,490  (28,896  (12,949  (3,807  (10,954  (81,096

Future income taxes

  (27,393  (68,017  (4,456  (2,732  (12,641  (115,239

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

  20,995    41,388    14,911    4,722    32,172    114,188  

Discount at 10%

  (10,549  (17,731  (11,608  (2,227  (19,969  (62,084

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  10,446    23,657    3,303    2,495    12,203    52,104  

As of December 31, 2013

      

Future cash inflows

  80,779    155,371    59,517    14,660    72,297    382,624  

Future production costs

  (18,859  (38,160  (27,316  (5,249  (15,106  (104,690

Future development costs

  (23,058  (25,951  (14,231  (3,234  (12,910  (79,384

Future income taxes

  (20,621  (55,303  (3,919  (2,288  (11,453  (93,584

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

  18,241    35,957    14,051    3,889    32,828    104,966  

Discount at 10%

  (8,166  (14,649  (11,557  (1,880  (20,932  (57,184

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  10,075    21,308    2,494    2,009    11,896    47,782  

(in millions of euros)

Minority interests in future net cash flows as of

      

December 31, 2011

      558                558  

December 31, 2012

      501                501  

December 31, 2013

      610                610  

  Consolidated subsidiaries 

(M)

 Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

As of December 31, 2009

      

Future cash inflows

  50,580    107,679    18,804    9,013    32,004    218,080  

Future production costs

  (11,373  (23,253  (8,286  (2,831  (6,996  (52,739

Future development costs

  (12,795  (21,375  (5,728  (698  (6,572  (47,168

Future income taxes

  (17,126  (36,286  (1,293  (2,041  (5,325  (62,071

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

  9,286    26,765    3,497    3,443    13,111    56,102  

Discount at 10%

  (3,939  (13,882  (2,696  (1,558  (8,225  (30,300

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  5,347    12,883    801    1,885    4,886    25,802  

As of December 31, 2010

      

Future cash inflows

  65,644    142,085    42,378    14,777    41,075    305,959  

Future production costs

  (16,143  (29,479  (19,477  (4,110  (6,476  (75,685

Future development costs

  (18,744  (25,587  (8,317  (3,788  (8,334  (64,770

Future income taxes

  (20,571  (51,390  (3,217  (2,541  (7,281  (85,000

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

  10,186    35,629    11,367    4,338    18,984    80,504  

Discount at 10%

  (5,182  (16,722  (8,667  (2,106  (11,794  (44,471

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  5,004    18,907    2,700    2,232    7,190    36,033  

As of December 31, 2011

      

Future cash inflows

  85,919    167,367    53,578    14,297    67,868    389,029  

Future production costs

  (18,787  (31,741  (22,713  (3,962  (12,646  (89,849

Future development costs

  (21,631  (22,776  (11,548  (3,110  (11,044  (70,109

Future income taxes

  (28,075  (71,049  (4,361  (2,794  (12,963  (119,242

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

  17,426    41,801    14,956    4,431    31,215    109,829  

Discount at 10%

  (9,426  (17,789  (12,298  (2,186  (20,717  (62,416

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  8,000    24,012    2,658    2,245    10,498    47,413  

Minority interests in future net cash flows as of

      

December 31, 2009

  212    60                272  

December 31, 2010

  273    344                617  

December 31, 2011

      558                558  
  Equity affiliates 

(M)

 Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

As of December 31, 2009

      

Future cash inflows

      1,432    16,750    48,486        66,668  

Future production costs

      (624  (6,993  (30,739      (38,356

Future development costs

      (26  (1,924  (3,891      (5,841

Future income taxes

      (245  (3,650  (1,843      (5,738

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

      537    4,183    12,013        16,733  

Discount at 10%

      (239  (2,816  (6,383      (9,438

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

      298    1,367    5,630        7,295  

As of December 31, 2010

      

Future cash inflows

      1,814    22,293    59,472        83,579  

Future production costs

      (765  (8,666  (40,085      (49,516

Future development costs

      (26  (2,020  (3,006      (5,052

Future income taxes

      (349  (5,503  (2,390      (8,242

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

      674    6,104    13,991        20,769  

Discount at 10%

      (203  (3,946  (7,386      (11,535

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

      471    2,158    6,605        9,234  

As of December 31, 2011

      

Future cash inflows

      210    29,887    64,977    7,116    102,190  

Future production costs

      (95  (17,393  (39,800  (2,683  (59,971

Future development costs

          (1,838  (2,809  (1,297  (5,944

Future income taxes

      (29  (5,152  (3,942  (2,280  (11,403

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

      86    5,504    18,426    856    24,872  

Discount at 10%

      (36  (3,652  (9,757  (196  (13,641

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

      50    1,852    8,669    660    11,231  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-14


  Equity affiliates 

(in millions of euros)

Group’s share of future net cash flows as of

 Europe  Africa  Americas  Middle
East
  Asia  Total 

As of December 31, 2011

      

Future cash inflows

      210    29,887    64,977    7,116    102,190  

Future production costs

      (95  (17,393  (39,800  (2,683  (59,971

Future development costs

          (1,838  (2,809  (1,297  (5,944

Future income taxes

      (29  (5,152  (3,942  (2,280  (11,403

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

      86    5,504    18,426    856    24,872  

Discount at 10%

      (36  (3,652  (9,757  (196  (13,641

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

      50    1,852    8,669    660    11,231  

As of December 31, 2012

      

Future cash inflows

      2,103    27,439    64,234    9,390    103,166  

Future production costs

      (99  (17,250  (35,830  (3,265  (56,444

Future development costs

          (2,360  (2,967  (3,906  (9,233

Future income taxes

      (392  (3,353  (5,430  (648  (9,823

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

      1,612    4,476    20,007    1,571    27,666  

Discount at 10%

      (1,087  (2,978  (10,316  (955  (15,336

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

      525    1,498    9,691    616    12,330  

As of December 31, 2013

      

Future cash inflows

      1,009    14,870    56,541    28,121    100,541  

Future production costs

      (105  (9,043  (29,094  (9,481  (47,723

Future development costs

          (1,265  (2,558  (3,866  (7,689

Future income taxes

      (262  (2,164  (5,076  (1,653  (9,155

Future net cash flows, after income taxes

      642    2,398    19,813    13,121    35,974  

Discount at 10%

      (480  (1,413  (10,121  (12,316  (24,330

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

      162    985    9,692    805    11,644  

S-15TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


CHANGES IN THE STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED

FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS

 

  Consolidated subsidiaries   Consolidated subsidiaries 

(M)

  2009 2010 2011 

(in millions of euros)

  2011 2012 2013 

Beginning of year

   15,986    25,802    36,033     36,033    47,413    52,104  

Sales and transfers, net of production costs

   (17,266  (22,297  (27,026   (27,026  (28,552  (24,742

Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production costs and other expenses

   35,738    30,390    44,315     44,315    7,382    (7,651

Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery

   (267  716    1,680     1,680    1,357    835  

Changes in estimated future development costs

   (4,847  (7,245  (4,798   (4,798  (6,503  (8,158

Previously estimated development costs incurred during the year

   7,552    7,896    9,519     9,519    11,809    13,757  

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

   164    5,523    1,288     1,288    2,719    1,141  

Accretion of discount

   1,599    2,580    3,603     3,603    4,741    5,210  

Net change in income taxes

   (12,455  (6,773  (16,925   (16,925  13,992    15,238  

Purchases of reserves in place

   230    442    885     885    299    1,102  

Sales of reserves in place

   (632  (1,001  (1,161   (1,161  (2,553  (1,054

End of year

   25,802    36,033    47,413     47,413    52,104    47,782  
  Equity affiliates   Equity affiliates 

(M)

  2009 2010 2011 

(in millions of euros)

  2011 2012 2013 

Beginning of year

   5,301    7,295    9,234     9,234    11,231    12,330  

Sales and transfers, net of production costs

   (987  (1,583  (1,991   (1,991  (1,885  (2,775

Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production costs and other expenses

   2,789    2,366    3,715     3,715    (743  (1,196

Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery

   407                 (25  3,761  

Changes in estimated future development costs

   (88  195    (383   (383  (495  408  

Previously estimated development costs incurred during the year

   854    651    635     635    809    831  

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

   (790  308    (749   (749  984    (3,792

Accretion of discount

   530    730    923     923    1,123    1,233  

Net change in income taxes

   (721  (728  (1,341   (1,341  1,314    836  

Purchases of reserves in place

           1,812     1,812    17    393  

Sales of reserves in place

           (624   (624      (385

End of year

   7,295    9,234    11,231     11,231    12,330    11,644  

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-16


OTHER INFORMATION

Net gas production, production prices and production costs

 

  Consolidated subsidiaries   Consolidated subsidiaries 

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total   Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 
2009            

2011

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

   1,643     480     545     297     1,224     4,189     1,350     607     839     424     1,162     4,382  

Production prices(b)

                        

Oil (/b)

   40.76     40.77     36.22     39.94     37.66     40.38     74.24     74.72     55.13     73.73     68.76     73.34  

Bitumen (/b)

             23.17               23.17               31.36               31.36  

Natural gas (/kcf)

   4.81     1.33     1.56     0.72     4.47     3.70     6.58     1.81     2.06     0.54     7.45     4.72  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)

                        

Total liquids and natural gas

   5.30     4.35     3.59     3.86     2.52     4.30     6.86     5.14     3.41     5.36     3.40     5.20  

Bitumen

             25.45               25.45               20.70               20.70  
  Equity affiliates   Equity affiliates 

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total   Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 
2009            

2011

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

                  268          268                    891     457     1,348  

Production prices(b)

                        

Oil (/b)

        42.98     33.14     43.98          42.18          66.21     61.15     77.07     30.75     73.61  

Bitumen (/b)

                                                            

Natural gas (/kcf)

                  3.53          3.53                    1.29     0.95     1.23  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)

                        

Total liquids and natural gas

        4.21     2.24     2.81          2.81          1.99     2.75     1.66     0.79     1.61  

Bitumen

                                                            
  Consolidated subsidiaries   Consolidated subsidiaries 

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total   Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2010

            

2012

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

   1,603     608     732     375     1,234     4,552     1,166     593     901     171     1,123     3,955  

Production prices(b)

                        

Oil (/b)

   55.70     56.18     45.28     55.83     52.33     55.39     79.82     82.65     61.85     81.05     75.49     80.84  

Bitumen (/b)

             33.19               33.19               35.27               35.27  

Natural gas (/kcf)

   5.17     1.55     1.83     0.63     5.67     3.94     7.10     2.19     2.23     0.90     8.35     5.31  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)

                        

Total liquids and natural gas

   6.23     4.53     3.29     4.82     2.93     4.72     8.78     5.69     3.92     10.76     4.61     6.36  

Bitumen

             17.49               17.49               24.00               24.00  
  Equity affiliates   Equity affiliates 

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total   Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2010

            

2012

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

                  650          650                    769     813     1,583  

Production prices(b)

                        

Oil (/b)

        53.96     43.81     57.03          54.95               105.12     83.26     28.27     83.27  

Bitumen (/b)

                                                            

Natural gas (/kcf)

                  2.30          2.30                    1.35     0.95     1.23  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)

                        

Total liquids and natural gas

        6.31     2.76     1.54          1.91               8.84     1.98     1.44     2.27  

Bitumen

                                                            

   Consolidated subsidiaries 
    Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2011

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

   1,350     607     839     424     1,162     4,382  

Production prices(b)

            

Oil (/b)

   74.24     74.72     55.13     73.73     68.76     73.34  

Bitumen (/b)

             31.36               31.36  

Natural gas (/kcf)

   6.58     1.81     2.06     0.54     7.45     4.72  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)

            

Total liquids and natural gas

   6.86     5.14     3.41     5.36     3.40     5.20  

Bitumen

             20.70               20.70  
   Equity affiliates 
    Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2011

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

                  891     457     1,348  

Production prices(b)

            

Oil (/b)

        66.21     61.15     77.07     30.75     73.61  

Bitumen (/b)

                              

Natural gas (/kcf)

                  1.29     0.95     1.23  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)

            

Total liquids and natural gas

        1.99     2.75     1.66     0.79     1.61  

Bitumen

                              

S-17TOTAL S.A. Form 20-F 2013


   Consolidated subsidiaries 

  

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2013

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

   1,134     569     860     149     1,193     3,905  

Production prices(b)

            

Oil (/b)

   73.60     77.30     49.65     74.22     70.22     74.80  

Bitumen (/b)

       34.43         34.43  

Natural gas (/kcf)

   7.17     2.00     2.66     0.85     7.64     5.28  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c))

            

Total liquids and natural gas

   9.72     6.31     4.27     12.93     4.77     6.96  

Bitumen

             23.90               23.90  
   Equity affiliates 

  

  Europe   Africa   Americas   Middle
East
   Asia   Total 

2013

            

Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)

                  935     927     1,862  

Production prices(b)

            

Oil (/b)

             62.10     78.62     38.88     74.57  

Bitumen (/b)

                              

Natural gas (/kcf)

                  1.78     0.81     1.47  

Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c))

            

Total liquids and natural gas

             6.25     2.24     0.59     1.97  

Bitumen

                              

 

(a)

The reported volumes are different from those shown in the reserves table due to gas consumed in operations.

(b)

The volumes used for calculation of the average sales prices are the ones sold from the Group’s own production.

(c)

The volumes of liquids used for this computation are shown in the proved reserves tables of this report. The reported volumes for natural gas are different from those shown in the reserves table due to gas consumed in operations.

 

S-19

2013 Form 20-F TOTAL S.A.S-18