As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 201230, 2013

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

 

¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112012

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 1-14728

 

Lan Airlines S.A.

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Lan Airlines S.A.

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.Republic of Chile

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Presidente Riesco 5711, 20th Floor

Las Condes

Santiago, Chile

(Address of principal executive offices)

Gisela Escobar Koch

Tel.: 56-2-565-3944 E-mail: gisela.escobar@lan.com

Presidente Riesco 5711, 20th Floor

Las Condes

Santiago, Chile

(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class:

 

Name of each exchange on which registered:

American Depositary Shares (as evidenced by

American Depositary Receipts), each representing

one share of Common Stock, without par value

 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 340,319,431.488,355,791.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yesx    No¨

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes¨    Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yesx    No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes¨    No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated filer  x                Accelerated filer  ¨                Non-Accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP  ¨

    

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued

by the International Accounting Standards Board  x

  Other  ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

Item 17¨    Item 18¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes¨    Nox

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION

   2  

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

   34  

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

   56  
PART I

ITEM 1.

 

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

   68  

ITEM 2.

 

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

   68  

ITEM 3.

 

KEY INFORMATION

   68  

ITEM 4.

 

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

   2832  

ITEM 4A

 

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

   11797  

ITEM 5.

 

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

   11797  

ITEM 6.

 

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

   141132  

ITEM 7.

 

CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

   149142  

ITEM 8.

 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

   152150  

ITEM 9.

 

THE OFFER AND LISTING

   154  

ITEM 10.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

   156157  

ITEM 11.

 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

   181183  

ITEM 12.

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

   186188  
PART II

ITEM 13.

 

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

   188189  

ITEM 14.

 

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

   188190  

ITEM 15.

 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

   188190  

ITEM 16.

 

RESERVED

   189191  
PART III

ITEM 17.

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   1195  

ITEM 18.

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   1195  

ITEM 19.

 

EXHIBITS

   1195  

PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION

In this annual report on Form 20-F, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “Lan Airlines”“LATAM Airlines Group” are to LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A., the unconsolidated operating entity, and references to “LAN,“LATAM,” “we,” “us” or the “Company” are to LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries.subsidiaries: Transporte Aéreo S.A. (which does business under the name “LAN Express”), LAN Perú S.A. (“LAN Peru”), Aerolane, Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A. (“LAN Ecuador”), LAN Argentina S.A. (“LAN Argentina,” previously Aero 2000 S.A.), Aerovías de Integración Regional, Aires S.A. (which does business under the name “LAN Colombia”), TAM Linhas Aereas S.A. (“TAM Linhas Aereas”) and LAN Cargo S.A. (“LAN Cargo”), and its three regional affiliates: Aero Transportes Mas de Carga S.A. de C.V. (“MasAir”) in Mexico, Linea Aerea Carguera de Colombia S.A. (“LANCO”) in Colombia and Aerolinhas Brasileiras S.A. (“ABSA”) in Brazil. All references to “Chile” are references to the Republic of Chile.

On June 22, 2012, LATAM Airlines Group was formed following the completion of the business combination between LAN Airlines S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“LAN”) with TAM S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“TAM”). Following the combination, LAN Airlines S.A. became “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” and TAM continues to exist as a subsidiary of Holdco I S.A. (“Holdco I”) and a subsidiary of LATAM Airlines Group. LATAM’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 include TAM’s financial results from June 23, 2012. As LATAM Airlines Group S.A. is the owner of substantially all the economic rights in TAM, TAM and its consolidated subsidiaries are for the purposes of this annual report and LATAM’s consolidated financial statements treated as being subsidiaries of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Combination of LAN and TAM.”

In this annual report on Form 20-F, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “LAN” are to LAN Airlines S.A., currently known as LATAM Airlines Group S.A., and its consolidated subsidiaries, in connection with circumstances and facts occurring prior to June 22, 2012.

In this annual report on Form 20-F, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “TAM” are to TAM S.A., and its consolidated subsidiaries, including TAM Linhas Aereas S.A., the operating entity, Multiplus S.A. (“Multiplus”), Pantanal Linhas Aéreas S.A. (“Pantanal”), Fidelidade Viagens e Turismo Limited (“TAM Viagens”), and Transportes Aéreos Del Mercosur S.A. (“TAM Mercosur”).

This annual report contains conversions of certain Chilean peso and Brazilian real amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. These conversions should not be construed as representations that the Chilean peso and the Brazilian real amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated. Unless we specify otherwise, all references to “$,” “US$,” “U.S. dollars” or “dollars” are to United States dollars, references to “pesos,” “Chilean pesos” or “Ch$” are to Chilean pesospesos. References to “reais,” “Brazilian reais,” or “R$” are to Brazilian reais, and references to “UF” are toUnidades de Fomento, a daily indexed Chilean peso-denominated monetary unit that takes into account the effect of the Chilean inflation rate. Unless we indicate otherwise, the U.S. dollar equivalent for information in Chilean pesos is based on the “dólar observado” or “observed” exchange rate published byBanco Central de Chile (which we refer to as the Central Bank of Chile) on December 31, 2011,28, 2012, which was Ch$519.20=478.60 = US$1.00. The observed exchange rate on March 23,April 15, 2013, was Ch$469.24 = US$1.00. Unless we indicate otherwise, the U.S. dollar equivalent for information in Brazilian reais is based on the “dólar observado” or “observed” exchange rate published byBanco Central doBrasil (which we refer to as the Central Bank of Brazil) on December 31, 2012, which was Ch$487.72=R$2.044 = US$1.00. The observed exchange rate on April 15, 2013, was R$ 1.979 =US$1.00. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon buying rate for Chilean pesos.pesos nor Brazilian reais. See “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Chilean Peso Exchange Rates”. and “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Brazilian Exchange Rates.”

LanLATAM Airlines Group and the majority of our subsidiaries (including our main cargo subsidiary Lan Cargo S.A., or Lan Cargo) maintain their accounting records and prepare their financial statements in U.S. dollars. Some of our other subsidiaries, however, maintain their accounting records and prepare their financial statements in Chilean pesos, Argentinean pesos, Colombian pesos or Colombian pesos.Brazilian reais. In particular, TAM maintains its accounting records and prepares its financial statements in Brazilian reais. Our

audited consolidated financial statements include the results of these subsidiaries translated into U.S. dollars. International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), require assets and liabilities to be translated at period-end exchange rates, while revenue and expense accounts are translated at each transaction date, although a monthly average rates.rate may also be used if exchange rates do not vary widely.

OurLATAM’s audited consolidated financial statements for the periods ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 20112012, were prepared in accordance with IFRS. PriorLAN’s date of transition to 2009 ourIFRS was January 1, 2008. Consequently, LAN prepared opening consolidated statements of financial position under IFRS as of that date. The date of adoption of IFRS was January 1, 2009. As a result, the summary consolidated annual financial information as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 presented in this annual report is derived from LAN’s audited consolidated annual financial statements were preparedincluded in previously issued annual reports filed by LAN. This financial information was previously presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Chile (“Chilean GAAP”)., and has been restated under IFRS differs in certain significant respects from Chilean GAAP.only for comparative purposes. As a result, ourLAN’s financial information presented under IFRS as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 (and later periods) is not directly comparable to our financial information presented with respect to previous years under Chilean GAAP. Accordingly, readers should avoid such comparison.

We have rounded percentages and certain U.S. dollar, and Chilean peso and Brazilian reais amounts contained in this annual report for ease of presentation. Any discrepancies in any table between totals and the sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding.

This annual report contains certain terms that may be unfamiliar to some readers. You can find a glossary of these terms on page 46 of this annual report.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements, including those relating to our proposedrecently completed combination with TAM S.A. (“TAM”).TAM. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Exchange OfferCombination of LAN and Mergers” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Proposed Combination with TAM”.TAM.” Such statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are not statements of historical facts. These statements are based on current plans, estimates and projections, and, therefore, you should not place undue reliance on them. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. We caution you that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. These factors include, but are not limited to:

 

the factors described in Item 3 under “Risk“Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors” generally and with respect to our proposed combination with TAM in particular;

whether the holders of a sufficient number of TAM’s free float shares accept the exchange offer;

 

our ability to service our debt and fund our working capital requirements;

 

future demand for passenger and cargo air service in Chile, Brazil other countries in Latin America and the rest of the world;

 

the maintenance of relationships with customers;

 

the state of the Chilean, Brazilian, Latin American and world economies and their impact on the airline industry;

 

the effects of competition;

 

future terrorist incidents or related activities affecting the airline industry;

 

future outbreak of diseases, or spread of already existing diseases, affecting traveling behavior and/or exports;

 

natural disasters affecting traveling behavior and/or exports;

 

the relative value of the Chilean, Peruvian, Ecuadorian, Colombian, Brazilian, Mexican and Argentine currencies compared to other currencies;

 

inflation;

 

competitive pressures on pricing;

 

our capital expenditure plans;

 

changes in labor costs, maintenance costs, and insurance premiums;

 

fluctuation of crude oil prices and its effect on fuel costs;

 

cyclical and seasonal fluctuations in our operating results;

 

defects or mechanical problems with our aircraft;

 

our ability to successfully implement our growth strategy;

increases in interest rates; and

 

changes in regulations, including regulations related to access to routes in which we operate.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly any of them, whether in light of new information, future events or otherwise. You should also read carefully the risk factors described in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors”.Factors.”

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

The following terms, as used in this annual report, have the meanings set forth below.

 

Capacity Measurements:  
“available seat kilometers” or “ASKs”  The number of seats made available for sale multiplied by the kilometers flown.
“available ton kilometers” or “ATKs”  The number of tons available for the transportation of revenue load (cargo) multiplied by the kilometers flown.
“available seat kilometers equivalent” or “ASK equivalent”The number of seats made available for sale plus the quotient of cargo ATKs divided by 0.095, all multiplied by the kilometers flown.
Traffic Measurements:  
“revenue passenger kilometers” or “RPKs”  The number of passengers multiplied by the number of kilometers flown.
“revenue ton kilometers” or “RTKs”  The load (cargo) in tons multiplied by the kilometers flown.
“traffic revenue”  Revenue from passenger and cargo operations.
Yield Measurements:  
“cargo yield”  Revenue from cargo operations divided by RTKs.
“overall yield”  Revenue from airline operations (passenger and cargo) divided by system RTKs (passenger and cargo).
“passenger yield”  Revenue from passenger operations divided by RPKs.
Load Factors:  
“cargo load factor”  RTKs (cargo) expressed as a percentage of ATKs (cargo).
“passenger load factor”  RPKs expressed as a percentage of ASKs.
Other:  
“ACMI leases”  A type of aircraft leasing contract, under which the lessor provides the aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance on a per hour basis. Also referred to as a “wet lease.”
“Airbus A320-Family Aircraft”  The Airbus A318, Airbus A319, Airbus A320 and Airbus A320A321 models of aircraft.

“block hours”  The elapsed time between an aircraft leaving an airport gate and arriving at an airport gate.
“m²”square meters.
“ton”  A metric ton, equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds.
“utilization rates”  The actual number of flight hours per aircraft per operating day.
“operating expenses”Operating expenses, which are calculated in accordance with IFRS, comprise the sum of the line items “cost of sales” plus “distribution costs” plus “administrative expenses” plus “other operating expenses”, as shown on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income. These operating expenses include: wages and benefits, fuel, depreciation and amortization, commissions to agents, aircraft rentals, other rental and landing fees, passenger services, airdraft maintenance, and other operating expenses.

PART I

 

ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION

A. Selected Financial Data

The following table presents our summaryOn June 22, 2012, LATAM Airlines Group was formed through the combination of LAN and TAM. Following the combination, LAN Airlines S.A. became “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” and TAM continues to exist as a subsidiary of Holdco I and a subsidiary of LATAM Airlines Group. Financial statements for LATAM fully consolidate TAM’s results since June 23, 2012.

Selected audited consolidated historical financial data. Ourinformation of LATAM provided under “—LATAM’s Historical Financial Information” below has been derived from LATAM’s audited consolidated financial statements relate toas described below. The LATAM Historical Financial Information includes (i) statement of income data for LATAM for the periodyear ended December 31, 2011,2012 (which includes TAM’s financial results from June 23, 2012), (ii) balance sheet data for LATAM as at December 31, 2012 (which includes TAM’s assets and constitute the third annual audited financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Our date of transition to IFRS was January 1, 2008. Consequently, we have prepared our opening consolidated statements of financial position under IFRSliabilities as of that date. Our datesuch date), and (iii) statement of adoptionincome and balance sheet data for LATAM for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, which represents LAN’s historical audited consolidated financial information.

LATAM’s Historical Financial Information

LATAM’s consolidated statement of IFRS was January 1, 2009.income data for the year ended December 31, 2012, includes TAM’s results of operations from June 23, 2012, and the LATAM balance sheet data as at December 31, 2012 consolidated TAM’s assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2012. The LATAM Historical Financial Information for the years ended 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 represents LAN’s historical audited consolidated financial information

The summary consolidated annual financial information of LATAM as of December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the threefour years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 has been prepared in accordance with IFRS and is derived from ourLATAM’s audited consolidated annual financial statements, which are included in this annual report or in previous annual reports.reports filed by LAN with the SEC.

LAN’s date of transition to IFRS was January 1, 2008. Consequently, LAN prepared opening consolidated statements of financial position under IFRS as of that date. The date of adoption of IFRS was January 1, 2009. As a result, the summary consolidated annual financial information as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 presented in this annual report is derived from ourLAN’s audited consolidated annual financial statements included in a previouspreviously issued annual report.reports filed by LAN. This financial information has beenwas previously presented in accordance with Chilean GAAP, and has been restated under IFRS only for comparative purpose.purposes. You should read the information below in conjunction with ourLATAM’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the sections of this annual report entitled “Presentation of Information” and “Operating“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

LATAM’s Annual Financial Information

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009  2008 
   (in US$ millions, except per share and capital stock data) 

The Company(1)(3)

     

Statement of Income Data:

     

Operating revenues

     

Passenger

       4,008.9        3,109.8        2,623.6        2,820.8  

Cargo

   1,576.5    1,280.7    895.6    1,319.4  

Total operating revenues

   5,585.4    4,390.5    3,519.2    4,140.2  

Cost of sales

   (4,078.6  (3,012.7  (2,522.8  (2,893.9

Gross margin

   1,506.8    1,377.8    996.4    1,246.3  

Other operating income(2)

   132.8    132.8    136.4    142.9  

Distribution costs

   (479.8  (383.5  (327.0  (366.7

Administrative expenses

   (406  (332  (270  (275

Other expenses

   (214.4  (172.4  (100.5  (127.9

Other gains/(losses)(4)

   (33.0  5.4    (11.7  (135

Financial income

   14.5    14.9    18.2    18.5  

Financial costs

   (139.1  (155.3  (153.1  (125.5

Equity accounted earnings

   0.5    0.1    0.3    0.7  

Exchange rate differences

   (0.3  13.8    (11.2  23.4  

Result of indexation units

   0.1    0.1    (0.6  1.2  

Income before income taxes

   382.4    502.0    277.5    403.4  

Income tax

   (61.8  (81.1  (44.5  (65.1

Net income for the period

   320.6    420.9    233.0    338.3  

Income attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   320.2    419.7    231.1    336.5  

Income attributable to non-controlling interests

   0.4    1.2    1.9    1.8  

Net income for the period

   320.6    420.9    233.0    338.3  

Earnings per share

     

Basic earnings per share (US$)(5)

   0.94335    1.23882    0.68221    0.99318  

Diluted earnings per share(US$)

   0.94260    1.23534    0.68221    0.99318  

   At December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009  2008 
   (in US$ millions, except per share and capital stock data) 

Balance Sheet Data:

     

Cash, and cash equivalents

   374.4    631.1    731.5    401.0  

Other current assets in operation

   964.3    896.5    666.6    665.8  

Non- current assets and disposal groups held for sale

   4.7    5.5    10.9    10.4  

Total current assets

   1,343.4    1,533.1    1,409.0    1,077.2  

Property and equipment

       5,928.0         4,948.4         4,196.6         3,966.1   

Other non- current assets

   377.3    304.4    166.4    153.6  

Total non- current assets

   6,305.3    5,252.8    4,363.0    4,119.7  

Total assets

   7,648.7    6,785.9    5,772.0    5,196.9  

Total current liabilities

   2,322.1    2,144.0    1,523.3    1,551.5  

Total non-current liabilities

   3,869.2    3,341.8    3,142.7    2,876.8  

Total liabilities

   6,191.3    5,485.8    4,666.0    4,428.3  

Net equity attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   1,445.3    1,296.8    1,098.8    761.8  

Minority interest

   12.0    3.2    7.1    6.8  

Total net equity

   1,457.3    1,300.1    1,105.9    768.6  

   At December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007 

Operational Data:

          

ASKs (million)

   48,153.6     42,355.2     38,776.2     35,176.1     31,556.0  

RPKs (million)

   38,422.9     33,147.5     29,836.2     26,951.7     24,001.2  

ATKs (million) (6)

   5,192.7     4,628.7     3,848.9     4,071.9     3,636.3  

RTKs (million)

   3,612.4     3,245.3     2,627.4     2,906.2     2,701.0  

System ATKs (million)

   10,056.1     8,968.8     7,811.8     7,659.9     6,999.9  
   Year ended December 31, 
   2012  2011  2010  2009  2008 
   (in US$ millions, except per share and capital stock data) 

The Company(1)(2)

      

Statement of Income Data:

      

Operating revenues

      

Passenger

   7,978.7    4,008.9    3,109.8    2,623.6    2,820.8  

Cargo

   1,743.5    1,576.5    1,280.7    895.6    1,319.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating revenues

   9,722.2    5,585.4    4,390.5    3,519.2    4,140.2  

Cost of sales

   (7,642.6  (4,078.6  (3,012.7  (2,522.8  (2,893.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   2,079.5    1,506.8    1,377.8    996.4    1,246.3  

Other operating income(3)

   220.2    132.8    132.8    136.4    142.9  

Distribution costs

   (803.6  (479.8  (383.5  (327.0  (366.7

Administrative expenses

   (869.5  (406.0  (332.0  (270.0  (275.0

Other expenses

   (311.8  (214.4  (172.4  (100.5  (127.9

Other gains/(losses)

   (38.8  (33.0  5.4    (11.7  (135.0

Financial income

   77.5    14.5    14.9    18.2    18.5  

Financial costs

   (294.6  (139.1  (155.3  (153.1  (125.5

Equity accounted earnings

   1.0    0.5    0.1    0.3    0.7  

Exchange rate differences

   66.7    (0.3  13.8    (11.2  23.4  

Result of indexation units

   0.0    0.1    0.1    (0.6  1.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   126.6    382.4    502.0    277.5    403.4  

Income tax

   (102.2  (61.8  (81.1  (44.5  (65.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the period

   24.4    320.6    420.9    233.0    338.3  

Income attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   11.0    320.2    419.7    231.1    336.5  

Income attributable to non-controlling interests

   13.4    0.4    1.2    1.9    1.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the period

   24.4    320.6    420.9    233.0    338.3  

Earnings per share

      

Average number of Shares

   412,267,624    339,424,598    338,790,909    338,790,909    338,790,909  

Basic earnings per share (US$)(4)

   0.02657    0.94335    1.23882    0.68221    0.99318  

Diluted earnings per share(US$)

   0.02657    0.9426    1.23534    0.68221    0.99318  
   At December 31, 
   2012  2011  2010  2009  2008 
   (in US$ millions, except per share and capital stock data) 

Balance Sheet Data:

  

Cash, and cash equivalents

   650.3    374.4    631.1    731.5    401.0  

Other current assets in operation

   2,649.6    964.3    896.5    666.6    665.8  

Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale

   47.7    4.7    5.5    10.9    10.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   3,347.6    1,343.4    1,533.1    1,409.0    1,077.2  

Property and equipment

   11,797.9    5,928.0    4,948.4    4,196.6    3,966.1  

Other non-current assets

   5,447.8    377.3    304.4    166.4    153.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

   17,245.7    6,305.3    5,252.8    4,363.0    4,119.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   20,593.3    7,648.7    6,785.9    5,772.0    5,196.9  

Total current liabilities

   5,780.3    2,322.1    2,144.0    1,523.3    1,551.5  

Total non-current liabilities

   9,644.2    3,869.2    3,341.8    3,142.7    2,876.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   15,424.5    6,191.3    5,485.8    4,666.0    4,428.3  

Issued Capital

   1,501.0    473.9    453.4    453.4    453.4  

Net equity attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   5,142.1    1,445.3    1,296.8    1,098.8    761.8  

Minority interest

   26.7    12.0    3.2    7.1    6.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net equity

   5,168.8    1,457.3    1,300.1    1,105.9    768.6  

 

(1)For more information on the subsidiaries included in this consolidated account, see Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

(2)The addition of the items may differ from the total amount due to rounding.
(3)Other operating income included in this Statement of Income Data is equivalent to the sum of income derived from duty free operations, aircraft leasing, logistics and courier operations, customs and warehousing operations, tours and other miscellaneous income.income, and for the year ended December 31, 2012, revenue of Multiplus. For more information, see Note 3032 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
(3)The addition of the items may differ from the total amount due to rounding.
(4)As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded a US$14.1 million gain (pre-tax) due to the reversal of a portion of the provision related to the investigation in the cargo business carried out by the European Commission. This was as a result of the fine announced in November 2010, which was lower than the amount provided for. This reversal is recorded in Other gains/(losses). In 2011, at a non-operational level, LAN’s consolidated results were impacted by the settlement agreement totaling US$66.0 million related to the civil class action in the cargo business, partially offset by the US$44.5 million gain from the sale of Blue Express International Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Blue Express S.A. At this level there was also included a one-time charge of UF 116,091 (US$5.0 million) resulting from a settlement agreement with the Chilean airline PAL regarding the pending legal proceeding before the TDLC and their appeal before the Chilean Supreme Court in connection with the combination of LAN and TAM
(5)As of December 31, 2009 and 2010 we had 338,790,909 common shares outstanding, which was equivalent to 338,790,909 American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”). As of December 31, 2011 we had 340,319,431340,326,431 common shares outstanding, which was equivalent to 340,319,431340,326,431 ADSs. As of December 31, 2012 we had 488,355,791 common shares outstanding, which was equivalent to 488,355,791 ADSs
(6)In August 2007, the Company implemented a change in its methodology used for calculating cargo ATKs in order to better represent the available capacity in the bellies of passenger aircraft. Cargo RTKs were not affected by this change. Historical data has been modified accordingly for comparison purposes.

The table below presents unaudited operating data of LATAM as at December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 (which represents LAN’s historical unaudited operating data), and as at December 31, 2012 (which includes TAM’s unaudited operating data since June 23, 2012). LATAM believes this operating data is useful to report the operating performance of its business and may be used by certain investors in evaluating companies operating in the global air transportation sector. However these measures may differ from similarly titled measures reported by other companies, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with IFRS. This unaudited operating data is not included in or derived from LATAM’s financial statements.

   For the year ended and as at December 31, 
Operating Data:  2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 

ASKs (million)

   93,319.2     48,153.6     42,355.2     38,776.2     35,176.1  

RPKs (million)

   74,694.9     38,422.9     33,147.5     29,836.2     26,951.7  

ATKs (million)

   6,449.6     5,192.7     4,628.7     3,848.9     4,071.9  

RTKs (million)

   4,044.5     3,612.4     3,245.3     2,627.4     2,906.2  

ASK Equivalent (million)

   161,209.3     102,813.6     91,078.4     79,290.9     78,038.2  

Although most of our revenues and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, some are denominated in different currencies, such as the Chilean peso.peso or the Brazilian real. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could lead to changes in the value of these items in U.S. dollars. Nevertheless, the impact on our results stemming from any such fluctuations is significantlypartially mitigated by the fact that 78.0%54% of our revenues and 53.0%42% of our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 are denominated in U.S. dollars.

LATAM Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The unaudited pro forma statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 combines the historical consolidated statements of income of LAN and TAM, giving effect to the combination as if it had been consummated on January 1, 2011.

The unaudited pro forma information has been prepared using the purchase method of accounting, with LAN treated as the acquirer of TAM. A reconciliation of the unaudited LATAM Pro Forma Financial Information to LATAM’s audited consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, is included under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—LATAM Airlines Group Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2012 (Pro forma) compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (Pro forma)—Pro Forma Adjustments.”

The LATAM unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations or the consolidated financial position of LATAM would have been had the proposed combination occurred on the dates assumed, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position of LATAM.

LATAM expects to incur significant costs associated with integrating the operations of LAN and TAM. The LATAM unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information does not reflect the costs of any integration activities that had not already been incurred as of those dates or benefits that may result from realization of future cost savings from operating efficiencies or revenue synergies expected to result from the proposed combination. You should read the unaudited pro forma financial information below in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—LATAM Airlines Group Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2012 (Pro forma) compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (Pro forma)—Pro Forma Adjustments,” “Presentation of Information” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

LATAM’s Unaudited Pro Forma Annual Financial Information       
   Year ended December 31, 
   2012  2011 

The Company(1)(2)

   

Statement of Income Data:

   

Operating revenues

   

Passenger

   11,066.0    10,960.7  

Cargo

   1,939.8    2,067.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating revenues

   13,005.7    13,028.3  

Cost of sales

   (10,564.8  (9,891.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   2,440.9    3,137.2  

Other operating income(3)

   265.4    283.0  

Distribution costs

   (1,059.7  (1,020.2

Administrative expenses

   (1,139.0  (1,043.7

Other expenses

   (364.5  (318.8

Other gains/(losses)

   (20.0  (3.7

Financial income

   117.2    160.6  

Financial costs

   (444.2  (452.6

Equity accounted earnings

   1.0    0.5  

Exchange rate differences

   (290.1  (555.5

Result of indexation units

   (0.0  0.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   (493.0  186.9  

Income tax

   74.0    (77.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the period

   (419.0  109.6  

Income attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   (445.4  49.8  

Income attributable to non-controlling interests

   26.5    59.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the period

   (419.0  109.6  

Earnings per share(4)

   

Average number of Shares

   476,293,870    474,543,664  

Basic earnings per share (US$)

   (0.93518  0.10494  

Diluted earnings per share(US$)

   (0.93518  0.10488  

1)For more information regarding LATAM’s historical income statements, on which this pro forma information is based, see “—LATAM’s Historical Financial Information” above. For more information on the subsidiaries included in this consolidated account, see Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

(2)The addition of the items may differ from the total amount due to rounding.
(3)Other income included in this Statement of Income Data consists of income derived from Multiplus, duty free operations, aircraft leasing, logistics and courier operations, customs and warehousing operations, tours and other miscellaneous income. For more information, see Note 30 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
(4)Earnings per share: Basic and diluted pro forma earnings per share have been calculated for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 based on the assumption that the shares issued in order to consummate the transaction had been issued at January 1, 2011.

The table below presents unaudited pro forma operating data of LATAM as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, which has been prepared by adding the relevant operating data for TAM in each period to LAN’s historical operating data. LATAM believes this operating data is useful to report the operating performance of its business and may be used by certain investors in evaluating companies operating in the global air transportation sector. However these measures may differ from similarly titled measures reported by other companies, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with IFRS. This unaudited pro forma operating data is not included in or derived from LATAM’s financial statements.

   For the year ended and as
at December 31,
 
Pro Forma Operating Data:  2012 Pro
Forma
   2011
Pro Forma
 

ASKs (million)

   132,448.7     126,565.5  

RPKs (million)

   103,555.1     96,081.2  

ATKs (million)

   7,645.9     7,683.5  

RTKs (million)

   4,488.3     4,597.8  

ASK Equivalent (million)

   212,932.4     207,444.2  

Dividend Policy

In accordance with theLey sobre Sociedades Anónimas No. 18,046(Chilean (Chilean Corporation Act) andReglamento de Sociedades Anónimas(Regulation to the Chilean Corporation Act) (collectively, the “Chilean Corporation Law”), we must pay annual cash dividends equal to at least 30.0% of our annual consolidated distributable net income each year (calculated in accordance with IFRS), subject to limited exceptions. In 2011, we paid interim dividends related to year 2011 results totaling US$141.6 million, equivalent to 44.2% of the Company’s net income in 2011. The aforementioned dividends were paid as follows: (i) on September 15, 2011, we paid a first interim dividend of US$56.6 million related to results as of June 30, 2011, to the shareholders on record as of September 9, 2011, representing US$0.16677 per share; and (ii) on January 12, 2012, we paid a second interim dividend of US$ 85.0 million related to full year 2011 results, to shareholders on record as of January 6, 2012, representing US$0.24988 per share. The table below sets forth the cash dividends per common share and per ADS, as well as the number of common shares entitled to such dividends, for the years indicated. Dividends per common share amounts have not been adjusted for inflation and reflect common share amounts outstanding immediately prior to the distribution of such dividend. In August 2007, LAN modified the ratio of its common shares to one of its American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), from 5:1 to 1:1.

Dividend for year:

  

Payment date(s)

  Total dividend
payment
   Number of
common
shares
entitled to
dividend
   Cash
dividend
per common
share
   Cash
dividend
per ADS
 
      (U.S. dollars)   (in millions)   (U.S. dollars)   (U.S. dollars) 

2007

  August 23, 2007   90,104,830     338.79     0.26596     0.26596  
  January 17, 2008   119,894,715     338.79     0.35389     0.35389  
  May 8, 2008   5,827,204     338.79     0.01720     0.01720  

2008

  August 21, 2008   96,785,787     338.79     0.28568     0.28568  
  January 15, 2009   105,001,466     338.79     0.30993     0.30993  

2009

  August 20, 2009   34,621,043     338.79     0.10219     0.10219  
  January 21, 2010   70,000,978     338.79     0.20662     0.20662  

Dividend for year:

  

Payment date(s)

  Total dividend
payment
   Number of
common
shares
entitled to
dividend
   Cash
dividend
per common
share
   Cash
dividend
per ADS
 
      (U.S. dollars)   (in millions)   (U.S. dollars)   (U.S. dollars) 
  May 20, 2010   10,939,558     338.79     0.03229     0.03229  

2010

  August 19, 2010   74,466,242     338.79     0.21980     0.2198  
  January 13, 2011   125,000,294     338.79     0.36896     0.36896  
  April 29, 2011   10,386,295     339.31     0.03061     0.03061  

2011

  September 15, 2011   56,594,769     339.36     0.16677     0.16677  
  January 12, 2012   85,000,207     340.16     0.24988     0.24988  

OurLATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors has the authority to declare interim dividends. Year-end dividends, if any, are declared by our shareholders at our annual meeting. For a description of our dividend policy, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy”. and “Item 10. Additional Information—Dividend and Liquidation Rights.” LATAM did not pay an interim dividend in 2012.

We declare cash dividends in U.S. dollars, but make dividend payments in Chilean pesos, converted from U.S. dollars at the observed exchange rate two days prior to the day we first make payment to shareholders. Payments of cash dividends to holders of ADRs, if any, are made in Chilean pesos to the custodian, which converts those Chilean pesos into U.S. dollars and delivers U.S. dollars to the depositary for distribution to holders. In the event that the custodian is unable to convert immediately the Chilean currency received as dividends into U.S. dollars, the amount of U.S. dollars payable to holders of ADRs may be adversely affected by a devaluation of the Chilean currency that may occur before such dividends are converted and remitted.

LATAM’s Dividend Payments

The table below sets forth the cash dividends per common share and per ADS paid by LATAM prior to the merger with TAM, as well as the number of common shares entitled to such dividends, for the years indicated. Dividends per common share amounts have not been adjusted for inflation and reflect common share amounts outstanding immediately prior to the distribution of such dividend.

Dividend for year:

  Payment date(s)   Total dividend
payment
   Number of
common
shares
entitled to
dividend
   Cash
dividend per
common
share
   Cash
dividend per
ADS
 
       (U.S. dollars)   (in millions)   (U.S. dollars)   (U.S. dollars) 

2008

   August 21, 2008     96,785,787     338.79     0.28568     0.28568  
   January 15, 2009     105,001,466     338.79     0.30993     0.30993  

2009

   August 20, 2009     34,621,043     338.79     0.10219     0.10219  
   January 21, 2010     70,000,978     338.79     0.20662     0.20662  
   May 20, 2010     10,939,558     338.79     0.03229     0.03229  

2010

   August 19, 2010     74,466,242     338.79     0.21980     0.2198  
   January 13, 2011     125,000,294     338.79     0.36896     0.36896  
   April 29, 2011     10,386,295     339.31     0.03061     0.03061  

2011

   September 15, 2011     56,594,769     339.36     0.16677     0.16677  
   January 12, 2012     85,000,207     340.16     0.24988     0.24988  
   May 17 , 2012     18,461,735     341.00     0.05414     0.05414  

Chilean Peso Exchange Rates

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end observed exchange rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars, expressed in Chilean pesos per U.S. dollar. The rates have not been restated in constant currency units. On April 15, 2013 the observed exchange rate was Ch$469.24= US$1.00.

 

  Daily Observed Exchange Rate   Daily Observed Exchange Rate 

Year Ended December 31,

  High   Low   Average(1)   Period-End   High   Low   Average(1)   Period-End 
  Ch$ per US$   Ch$ per US$ 

2007

   548.67     493.14     521.95     495.82  

2008

   676.75     431.22     528.88     629.11     676.75     431.22     528.88     629.11  

2009

   643.87     491.09     553.77     506.43     643.87     491.09     553.77     506.43  

2010

   549.17     468.37     511.20     468.37     549.17     468.37     511.20     468.37  

2011

           533.74     455.91     483.67     521.46  

2012

   519.69     469.65     486.75     478.60  

September

   521.85     460.34     483.69     515.14     481.11     469.65     474.97     470.48  

October

   533.74     492.04     511.74     492.04     481.98     471.54     475.36     480.03  

November

   526.83     490.29     508.44     524.25     484.48     476.20     480.57     479.42  

December

   522.62     508.67     517.17     521.46     481.28     474.36     477.13     478.60  

End of year

   533.74     455.91     483.67     521.46  

2012

        

2013

        

January

   519.20     485.35     501.34     488.99     479.96     470.67     472.67     471.40  

February

   488.75     475.29     481.49     477.41     473.60     470.67     472.34     473.30  

March(2)

   491.57     476.27     484.59     491.57  

March

   474.82     471.10     472.50     472.54  

April(2)

   472.55     466.50     470.00     469.24  

 

Source: Central Bank of Chile

 

(1)For each year, the average of the month-end exchange rates for the relevant year. For each month, the average daily exchange rate for the relevant month.
(2)Through March 23, 2012.April 15, 2013.

Brazilian Exchange Rates

TAM maintains its accounting records and prepares its financial statements in Brazilian reais. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end observed exchange rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars, expressed in Brazilian reais per U.S. dollar. The rates have not been restated in constant currency units. On March 23, 2012April 15, 2013 the observed exchange rate was Ch$487.72=Br$1.979 = US$1.00.

   Daily Observed Exchange Rate 

Year Ended December 31,

  High   Low   Average(1)   Period-End 
   BR$ per US$ 

2008

   2.500     1.559     1.837     2.337  

2009

   2.422     1.702     1.998     1.741  

2010

   1.881     1.655     1.759     1.666  

2011

   1.902     1.535     1.675     1.876  

2012

   2.112     1.702     1.955     2.043  

September

   2.039     2.013     2.028     2.031  

October

   2.038     2.022     2.029     2.031  

November

   2.107     2.031     2.067     2.107  

December

   2.112     2.043     2.077     2.044  

2013

        

January

   2.047     1.988     2.031     1.988  

February

   1.989     1.957     1.973     1.975  

March

   2.019     1.953     1.983     2.014  

April(2)

   2.024     1.974     1.997     1.979  

Source: Central Bank of Brazil

(1)For each year, the average of the month-end exchange rates for the relevant year. For each month, the average daily exchange rate for the relevant month.
(2)Through April 15, 2013.

B. Capitalization and IndebtnessIndebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

We wish to caution readers that the following important factors, and those important factors described in other reports submitted to, or filed with, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) among other factors, could affect our actual results and could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. In particular, as we are a non-U.S. company, there are risks associated with investing in our ADSs that are not typical for investments in the shares of U.S. companies. Prior to making an investment decision, you should carefully consider all of the information contained in this document, including the following risk factors.

Risks Relating to the Exchange Offer and Mergers involving TAM S.A.

Both commencement and completion of the exchange offer are subject to many conditions precedent and if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the proposed combination with TAM S.A. will not be completed

We and TAM S.A., a Brazilian company (“TAM”), are proposing to combine to form the leading Latin American airline group with the largest fleet of aircraft of any airline in Latin America. When the proposed combination is completed, LAN will be the holding company of the combined companies and will change its name to “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” (“LATAM”). The proposed combination will be implemented through a delisting exchange offer to be made in the United States and in Brazil to acquire all of the outstanding voting common shares of TAM (“TAM common shares”), non-voting preferred shares of TAM (“TAM preferred shares and collectively with the TAM common shares, the “TAM shares”) and American Depositary Shares representing TAM shares (“TAM ADSs”), in each case other than any such shares owned indirectly by the TAM controlling shareholders (as defined below), and other mergers and corporate restructuring transactions described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Proposed Combination with TAM”, in each case pursuant to the terms and conditions of the implementation agreement and the exchange offer agreement entered into on January 18, 2011 (the “transaction agreements”) by LAN, TAM, the controlling shareholders of LAN under Chilean law (Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A. and Inversiones Mineras del Cantábrico S.A., which we refer to individually as “Costa Verde Aeronáutica” and “Mineras del Cantábrico,” respectively and collectively as the “LAN controlling shareholders”), the controlling shareholders of TAM under Brazilian law (Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro, Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, Maurício Rolim Amaro and João Francisco Amaro, whom we refer to collectively as the “TAM controlling shareholders”), and TAM Empreendimentos e Participações S.A., a company through which the TAM controlling shareholders held their TAM shares (as defined below) at that time ( “TEP”). The commencement of the exchange offer is subject to certain conditions set forth in the transaction agreements as described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Conditions for the Commencement of the Exchange Offer”, including receipt of all required regulatory approvals (including the required approvals from theComissão de Valores Mobiliários(“CVM”), theSuperintendencia de Valores y Seguros (the Chilean Securities and Insurance Supervisor) (“SVS”), and the SEC. In addition, approval of the proposed combination by our shareholders is subject to the rendering of a final decision by the Chilean Supreme Court on our appeal of the mitigation measures imposed by theTribunal de Defensa de la Competencia (Chilean Free Competition Defense Court) (“TDLC”) in connection to the proposed combination with TAM. The completion of the exchange offer is also subject to certain conditions set forth in the transaction agreements as described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Conditions to Completion of the Exchange Offer,” including the following:

Delisting Condition

The number of qualifying minority shares that are held by “agreeing shareholders” must be more than 66 2/3% of the total number of qualifying minority shares that are held by agreeing shareholders and disagreeing shareholders (this is the minimum threshold required to cause the deregistration of TAM as a public company in Brazil with CVM and the delisting of TAM shares from the BM&FBovespa (“Bovespa”).

A holder will be deemed to be an “agreeing shareholder” with respect to its qualifying minority shares only if such holder:

validly tenders such qualifying minority shares into the exchange offer through the US exchange agent and does not withdraw such shares from the exchange offer; or

qualifies such qualifying minority shares for participation in the auction to be held on Bovespa (the “Auction”) and:

tenders such shares into, and does not withdraw them from, the Auction; and/or

indicates on the qualification form (a copy of which will be included with the letter of transmittal mailed to holders of TAM shares in connection with the exchange offer) that it agrees with the deregistration of TAM as a public company in Brazil with CVM.

A holder will be deemed to be a “disagreeing shareholder” with respect to its qualifying minority shares only if such holder:

validly tenders such qualifying minority shares into the exchange offer through the US exchange agent and subsequently withdraws such shares from the exchange offer; or

qualifies such qualifying minority shares for participation in the Auction and:

does not tender such shares in the Auction; and/or

indicates on the qualification form (a copy of which will be included with the letter of transmittal) that it disagrees with the deregistration of TAM as a public company in Brazil with CVM.

For purposes of the delisting condition, “qualifying minority shares” mean all outstanding TAM shares not represented by TAM ADSs and all outstanding TAM ADSs, in each case that are not owned by TAM, the TAM controlling shareholders, any of their related persons (“pessoas vinculadas”) or any director or executive officer of TAM.

The delisting condition will not be waivable under Brazilian law, so if the delisting condition is not satisfied, the exchange offer will terminate and the mergers will not be completed.

Squeeze-Out Condition

The sum of (i) the number of TAM shares and TAM ADSs validly tendered into, and not withdrawn from, the exchange offer and (ii) the number of TAM shares beneficially owned by the TAM controlling shareholders (which represented approximately 46.63% of the outstanding TAM shares as of March 28, 2012), represents more than 95% of the total number of outstanding TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) (this is the minimum acquisition threshold required under applicable Brazilian law to give TAM the right to compulsorily redeem any TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) not owned by LAN or Holdco I S.A. (“Holdco I”) after completion of the exchange offer, the mergers and the other transactions described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements”); and

The absence of certain actions, events or circumstances that, individually or in the aggregate, have had an adverse effect on the businesses, revenues, operations or financial condition of TAM and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in all material respects.

Certain of these conditions may not be waived without written agreement of both LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders, and neither LAN nor the TAM controlling shareholders has any obligation to waive any conditions not satisfied on or prior to the expiration of the exchange offer. Therefore, even if we are willing to waive an unsatisfied condition, we may be unable to complete the exchange offer if the TAM controlling shareholders refuse to waive the condition. In addition, the obligation of the TAM controlling shareholders under the transaction agreements to contribute their TAM shares into the proposed combination prior to the completion of the exchange offer is subject to certain conditions relating to the operations and business of LAN and certain events outside of our control. Payment of such subscriptions is a condition to the completion of the exchange offer. If any of these conditions is not satisfied or waived, the exchange offer and mergers will not be completed.

If the squeeze-out condition is not satisfied and we waive this condition, we may be unable to fully realize the anticipated benefits of the proposed combination

If the squeeze-out condition is not satisfied and we waive this condition, TAM will not be permitted under Brazilian law to compulsorily redeem any TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) that were not acquired in the exchange offer and the mergers unless LAN later acquires a sufficient number of TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) so as to allow TAM to compulsorily redeem the remaining outstanding TAM shares and TAM ADSs pursuant to Brazilian law. Depending on the quantity of minority shareholders remaining after completion of the exchange offer and the mergers, their existence may limit LATAM’s ability to combine the businesses and operations of LAN and TAM, which could adversely affect the combined companies’ ability to realize the potential benefits and cost savings from combining these businesses. Failure to fully realize these potential benefits and any temporary or permanent delay in integrating the businesses and operations of these two companies, could adversely affect the revenues, level of expenses and operating results of the combined companies after the completion of the proposed combination.

The final decision by the Chilean Supreme Court in connection with the mitigation measures imposed by the Chilean Free Competition Defense Court may not be rendered on time

Before the proposed combination of LAN and TAM may be completed, the final decision of the Chilean Supreme Court with respect to the appeal filed by LAN seeking the amendment or elimination of three of the conditions set forth in the decision issued by the TDLC with respect to the proposed combination with TAM, has been rendered. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Proposed Combination with TAM” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Conditions to Commencement of the Exchange Offer”, for a discussion of the status of the Company’s appeal. A final decision by the Chilean Supreme Court with respect to the appeal is expected by the Company in the next month, but there can be no assurance that the decision will be obtained within the expected time frame, or that the decision will not prevent the transaction to go forward. If the final decision of the Chilean Supreme Court is not rendered by the expected time frame, and this situation is not waived by the parties to the transactions agreements, the exchange offer and mergers will not be completed.

Any delay in completing the proposed combination may reduce or eliminate the benefits we expect to be achieved as a result of the proposed combination

The proposed combination is subject to a number of other conditions beyond our control that may prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect its completion. We cannot predict whether or when these other conditions will be satisfied. Any delay in completing the proposed combination could cause the combined companies not to realize some or all of the synergies that we expect to achieve if the proposed combination is successfully completed within its expected time frame.

Failure to complete the proposed combination could negatively impact our stock price and future business and financial results

If the proposed combination is not completed, our ongoing businesses may be adversely affected, and we would be subject to several risks, including the following:

being required to pay a termination fee to TAM of $200 million and reimburse of TAM’s expenses under certain circumstances provided in the transaction agreements;

having to pay certain costs relating to the proposed combination, such as legal, accounting, financial advisor and printing fees; and

having had our management focus on the proposed combination instead of pursuing other opportunities that could have been beneficial to us.

If the proposed combination is not completed, we cannot assure our stockholders that these risks will not materialize and will not materially adversely affect our business, financial results and stock price.

The transaction agreements contain provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer of LAN

The transaction agreements require our board of directors to recommend that its shareholders approve the proposed combination and does not permit our board of directors to withdraw or adversely modify those recommendations. The transaction agreements also contains “no shop” provisions that prohibit us from soliciting, initiating or encouraging any competing third party proposals, including acquisitions of our equity securities or material assets, and there are no exceptions to these provisions. In addition, if the transaction agreements are terminated under certain circumstances, we may be required to pay to TAM a termination fee of $200 million and to reimburse TAM for expenses incurred by TAM in connection with the transaction agreements and the proposed combination. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Termination”. These provisions could discourage a potential third-party acquiror that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of LAN from considering or proposing that acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a value per share higher than the benefits LAN shareholders may receive from the proposed combination, or might result in a potential third-party acquiror proposing to pay a lower price to the LAN shareholders than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the $200 million termination fee and expense reimbursement that may become payable in certain circumstances.

The fairness opinion obtained by our board of directors from our financial advisor will not reflect changes in circumstances between signing the transaction agreements and the completion of the proposed combination

While our board of directors received an initial fairness opinion from J.P. Morgan, our financial advisor, before we entered into the transaction agreements (the “Initial JPM Opinion”), and a supplemental fairness opinion, dated November 11, 2011 (the “Supplemental JPM Opinion”), we have not obtained an updated fairness opinion as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F. Changes in our operations and prospects and those of TAM, general market and economic conditions and other factors which may be beyond our control and on which the fairness opinions were based may alter the value of LAN or TAM and/or the prices of our common shares and/or the TAM shares by the time the proposed combination is completed. The Initial JPM Opinion and the Supplemental JPM speak only as of the date of such opinions and not as of the time the proposed combination will be completed or as of any other date. Because we do not anticipate asking our financial advisor to further update its fairness opinion, neither the Initial JPM Opinion nor the Supplemental JPM Opinion address the fairness of the exchange ratios in the exchange offer, from a financial point of view, to us at the time the proposed combination will be completed.

Resales of LAN shares issued in the mergers may cause the market price of such shares to fall

As of March 28, 2012, 340,977,309 LAN shares were issued and outstanding (of which 33.84% were beneficially owned by the LAN controlling shareholders) and 1,216,251 LAN shares were subject to issuance upon exercise of outstanding options and other rights to purchase such shares. In the mergers, LAN expects to issue a significant amount of LAN shares in the form of LAN American Depositary Shares (“LAN ADSs”) and LAN Brazilian Depositary Shares (“LAN BDSs”) to the holders of TAM shares and TAM ADSs in exchange for their TAM shares or TAM ADSs, although the actual number of LAN shares issued will depend on the extent to which holders of such TAM shares and TAM ADSs elect to tender their TAM shares and/or TAM ADSs into the exchange offer and the number of vested stock options and other rights to acquire TAM shares that are exercised before the completion of the exchange offer and the mergers. If all holders of TAM shares and TAM ADSs, other than the TAM controlling shareholders, validly tender all of their TAM shares and/or TAM ADSs into, and do not withdraw them from, the exchange offer, the TAM controlling shareholders contribute all of their TAM shares into the proposed business combination and no TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) or LAN shares (including those represented by LAN ADSs and LAN BDSs) are issued after the date of the exchange offer other than the LAN common shares to be issued pursuant to the exchange offer and the mergers which will be represented by LAN ADSs and LAN BDSs, then LAN will issue a total of 140,586,107 LAN common shares in connection with the exchange offer and the mergers and immediately after the effective time of the mergers, the issued and outstanding LAN shares (including those represented by LAN ADSs and LAN BDSs but excluding those reserved under stock option plans) will be owned approximately as follows: 13.62% of such LAN shares will be held by the TAM controlling shareholders, 15.59% of such LAN shares will be held by the holders of TAM shares and TAM ADSs other than the TAM controlling shareholders, 23.97% of such LAN shares will be held by the LAN controlling shareholders and 46.82% of such LAN shares will be held by the holders of LAN shares other than the LAN controlling shareholders. If there are substantial sales of the newly issued LAN shares shortly after the effective time of the mergers, this could adversely affect the market for, and the market price of, the LAN common shares, the LAN ADSs and the LAN BDSs.

Risks Relating to the Combination of LAN and TAM

LANLATAM Airlines Group may be unable to fully realize the anticipated benefits of the proposed combination of LAN and TAM

After completionIn June 2012, LAN and TAM completed a business combination, which was effected through a series of the proposedtransactions and corporate restructurings. The combination LAN will change its name to “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” The proposed combination involves bringingbrought together two large and complex businesses that currently operatehad previously operated as independent public companies. LANSignificant management attention and resources will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integratingintegrate certain aspects of the business practices and operations of LAN and TAM. The success of the proposed combination will depend, in part, on LAN’sthe ability of LATAM Airlines Group to realize anticipated revenue synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities by combining the businesses of LAN and TAM. LANLATAM Airlines Group hopes to generate synergies resulting from the consolidation of capabilities, rationalization of operations and headcount, greater efficiencies from increased scale and market integration, new product and service offerings and organic growth. There is a risk, however, that LANLATAM Airlines Group may not be able to combine the businesses of LAN and TAM in a manner that permits LANLATAM Airlines Group to realize these revenue synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities in the time, manner or amounts LAN currentlyit expects, or at all. Potential difficulties LANLATAM Airlines Group may encounter as part of the integration process include, among other things:

the inability to successfully combine the businesses of LAN and TAM in a manner that permits LAN to achieve the full revenue synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities anticipated to result from the proposed combination;

 

complexities associated with managing the combined companies;

 

the need to implement, integrate and harmonize various business-specific operating procedures and systems, as well as the financial, accounting, information and other systems of LAN and TAM;

 

potential loss of key employees as a result of implementing the proposed combination;

 

the need to coordinate the existing products and customer bases of LAN and TAM; and

potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the exchange offer, the mergers and the other combination transactions, including one-time cash costs to complete and implement the proposed combination that may exceed the one-time cash costs that LAN currently anticipates.the companies anticipated.

In addition, LAN and TAM have operated and, until the completion of the exchange offer and the mergers, will continue to operate under their existing separate airline certificates. It is possible that the integration process could result in:

 

diversion of management’s attention from their normal areas of responsibility to address integration issues; and

 

the disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in its standards, controls, procedures and policies,

each of which could adversely affect each company’s ability to maintain good relationships with its customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies, or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the proposed combination, and could increase costs or reduce each company’s earnings or otherwise adversely affect the businesses, financial condition, results of operations and/or prospects of the combined companies following the completion of the exchange offer and the mergers.

Actual revenue synergies, cost savings, growth opportunities and efficiency and operational benefits that result from the proposed combination may be lower and may take a longer time to achieve than LANLATAM currently expects.

The integration of two large companies also presents significant management challenges. In order to achieve the anticipated benefits of the proposed combination, the operations of the two companies will need to beare being reorganized and

their resources will need to be combined in a timely and flexible manner. There can be no assurance that LANLATAM will be able to implement these steps as anticipated or at all. If LANLATAM fails to achieve the planned restructuring effectively within the time frame that is currently contemplated or to the extent that is currently planned, or if for any other reason the expected revenue synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities fail to materialize, the exchange offer, the mergers and the other combination transactions described in this annual report may not produce the benefits LAN currentlyLATAM anticipates. As of December 2012 the merged company has establish numerous of initiatives in order to integrate both companies and generate the estimated synergies. During the first six months of joint operations LATAM Airlines Group recognized US$72 million in merger synergies, before merger related expenses.

LANLATAM has incurred and will continue to incur significant costs and expenses in connection with the proposed combination and integration of the business operations of LAN and TAM

LANLATAM has incurred and will continue to incur substantial expenses in connection with the proposed combination and the integration of LAN and TAM. LAN incurred approximately US$15 million in non-recurring expenses in connection with the proposed combination during 2011. In 2012, LATAM incurred US$47.0 million of non-recurring expenses on an as reported basis, in 2011,connection with the business combination and expectsintegration of LAN and TAM, principally relating to incurlegal and consulting fees, and travel expenses.This latter figure is in line with the company’s estimate of US$25200 million in such expenses in 2012.one—time costs related to the merger to be incurred over the first year after the business combination. Significant costs and expenses have been and are beingwere incurred related to the exchange offer, the mergers and the other transactions.transactions to effect the combination. These costs and expenses includeincluded financial advisory, legal, accounting, consulting and other advisory fees and expenses, reorganization and restructuring costs, severance/employee benefit-related expenses, filing fees, printing expenses and other related charges. Some of these costs are payable by LAN and TAM depending on the nature of the expense and regardless of whether the proposed combination is completed. There are also a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that must be integrated in connection with the proposed combination. While bothAny delay in the integration of the business operations of LAN and TAM have assumed that a certain level of expenses would be incurred in connection with these transactions, there are manyor factors beyond LAN’s and TAM’sLATAM’s control that could affect the total amount or the timing of the integration and implementation expenses.

There may also beIf additional unanticipated significant costs are incurred in connection with the proposed combination that LAN may not recoup. Theseor integration of these businesses, such costs and expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that LANLATAM expects to achieve from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale, other efficiencies and cost savings. Although LANLATAM expects that theseto achieve savings willand economies of scale sufficient to offset these integration and implementation costs over time, this net benefit may not be achieved in the near term or at all.

LAN willLATAM does not control the voting shares or board of directors of TAM

After completionFollowing the combination of the exchange offer, the mergersLAN and the other transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements:TAM:

 

Holdco I will ownowns 100% of the TAM common shares that were:previously outstanding;

 

contributedTEP Chile S.A., a Chilean company that is wholly owned by the TAM controlling shareholders, or

acquired pursuant to the exchange offer,

LAN will own 100% of the TAM preferred shares that were acquired pursuant to the exchange offer or contributed by the TAM controlling shareholders,

The TAM controlling shareholders will own at least 80%Controlling Shareholders (“TEP Chile”), owns approximately 80.58% of the outstanding Holdco I voting shares and LAN will own no more than 20% ofowns the remaining outstanding Holdco I voting shares, due to a Brazilian restriction that prohibits non-Brazilians to ownfrom owning more than 20% of a Brazilian airline, andairline;

 

LAN will ownLATAM owns 100% of the outstanding Holdco I non-voting shares, which will entitleentitles it to essentially all of the economic rights in respect of the TAM common shares held by Holdco I.I; and

LATAM owns 100% of the TAM preferred shares previously outstanding.

As a result of this ownership structure:

 

the TAM controlling shareholders will,TEP Chile, by virtue of theirits control of the voting shares of Holdco I and the boards of directors of each of Holdco I, TAM and each airline subsidiary of TAM, retain voting and board control of TAM and each airline subsidiary of TAM; and

 

LAN,LATAM, by virtue of its ownership of all of the non-voting shares of Holdco I and TAM preferred shares acquired pursuant to the exchange offer and the mergers, will be, is entitled to virtually all of the economic rights in TAM subject only to the rights of holders of any TAM shares not so acquired.TAM.

LAN, the TAM controlling shareholders

LATAM and TEP Chile and other parties have entered into shareholdersshareholders’ agreements that establish agreements and restrictions relating to corporate governance in an attempt to balance LAN’sLATAM’s interests, as the owner of substantially all of the economic rights in TAM, and the TAM controlling shareholders, as the continuing controlling shareholders of TAM under Brazilian law, by prohibitinglaw. See “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Shareholders’ Agreements.” These shareholders’ agreements prohibit the taking of certain specified material corporate actions and decisions without prior supermajority approval of the shareholders (5/6 of the total of the shareholders) and/or the board of directors of Holdco I or TAM. However, no assurances can be given that LANLATAM and the TAM controlling shareholders will be able to reach an agreement with respect to such supermajority voting or board matters in the future and if they do not, the businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of the combined companies could be adversely affected. In addition, pursuant to these shareholder agreements, neither Holdco I, TAM nor TAM’s subsidiaries may take certain actions without the prior approval of a supermajority of the board of directors and/or the shareholders of Holdco I or TAM. As a result of these supermajority requirements, these actions will effectively require the prior approval of both LANLATAM and TEP Chile S.A. (“TEP Chile”) (which will beis wholly owned by the TAM controlling shareholders). Actions requiring supermajority approval by the board of directors of Holdco I or TAM include, among others, entering into acquisitions or business collaborations, amending or approving budgets, business plans, financial statements and accounting policies, incurring indebtedness, encumbering assets, entering into certain agreements, making certain investments, modifying rights or claims, entering into settlements, appointing executives, creating security interests, issuing, redeeming or repurchasing securities and voting on matters as a shareholder of subsidiaries of TAM. Actions requiring supermajority shareholder approval of Holdco I or TAM include, among others, certain changes to the by-laws of Holdco I, TAM or TAM’s subsidiaries or any dissolution/liquidation, corporate reorganization, payment of dividends, issuance of securities, disposal or encumbrance of certain assets, creation of securities interest or entering into guarantees and agreements with related parties.

Uncertainties associated with the proposed combination of LAN and TAM may cause a loss of management personnel and other key employees that could adversely affect LAN, TAM and/or the combined companiesLATAM’s operations.

The success of the proposed combination is dependent, in part, on the experience and industry knowledge of their senior management and other key employees of LAN and TAM and their ability to execute their business plans. In order to be successful, LAN, TAM and the combined companiesLATAM must be able to retain the senior management and other key employees and their ability to attract highly qualified personnel in the future. Current and prospective employees of LAN and TAM may experience uncertainty about their roles within LATAM following completion of the proposed combination, which may have an adverse effect on theLATAM’s ability of LAN, TAM or the combined companies to retain or attract senior management and other key employees. Competition for highly qualified personnel in the various localities and business segments in which LAN and TAM operate,LATAM operates is intense. No assurances can be given that LAN and TAM or, after completion of the proposed combination, the combined companiesLATAM will be able to retain or attract senior management and other key employees following the merger to the same extent that LAN and TAM havehad previously been able to do so.

The financial results of LATAM will beare more exposed to foreign currency fluctuations following the combination with TAM.

The financial results of LATAM are more exposed to currency exchange rate fluctuations as a result of the proposed combination with TAM and the resulting increase in the proportion of its assets, liabilities and earnings that are denominated in currencies other than US dollarsU.S. dollars.

LATAM will prepareprepares and presentpresents its consolidated financial statements in US dollars.U.S. dollars, which was the functional and presentation currency of LAN. The proposed combination willof LAN and TAM has significantly increaseincreases the proportion of LAN’sLATAM’s consolidated net assets, revenues and income in non-USnon-U.S. dollar currencies, primarily Chileanpesos and Brazilianrealreais. In particular, the majority of TAM’s revenues are denominated in Brazilian reais, while a significant portion of its operating expenses are denominated in, or linked to, the U.S. dollar or other foreign currencies. The consolidated financial condition and results of operations of LATAM will therefore be more sensitive to movements in exchange rates between the USU.S. dollar and other currencies. A depreciation of non-USnon-U.S. dollar currencies relative to the USU.S. dollar could have an adverse impact on the financial condition, results of operations and prospects of LATAM.

LATAM’s future results will suffer if it cannot effectively manage its expanded operations following completion of the proposed combination

Following the completion of the proposed combination, theThe size of LATAM’s combined business following the businesscombination of the combined companies will beLAN and TAM is significantly larger and more complex than the current businessprevious businesses of LAN or TAM. LAN’sTAM individually. LATAM’s future success will depend, in part, on LAN’sLATAM’s ability to manage this expanded business, which will pose substantial challenges for management, including those related to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no assurances that LATAM will be successful or that it will realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings, revenue synergies and other benefits currently anticipated by LAN and TAM from the proposed combination.

The proposedFollowing the combination, could cause aFitch Ratings Inc. (“Fitch”) lowered LATAM’s credit rating. This downgrade, of LAN’s credit ratings, whichor further downgrades, could have a negative effect on LAN’s business

Prior to the combination, TAM currently hashad a lower credit rating and iswas more leveraged than LAN. As a result ofFollowing the proposed combination, LAN’sFitch Ratings Inc. downgraded LATAM Airlines Group S.A.’s long-term foreign currency issuer default rating from BBB to BB+, which is below investment grade. It is possible that LATAM’s credit rating could be further downgraded by one or more credit rating agencies, whichagencies. The Fitch downgrade and any further downgrades could increase LATAM’s financing costs and affect LATAM’s ability to finance future fleet acquisitions and could adversely affect the financial condition, results of operations and prospects of the combined companies. If LAN’s credit rating is downgraded, it could affect LAN’s ability to finance future fleet acquisitions and/or increase LAN’s financing costs.

It may take time to combine the frequent flyer programs of LAN and TAM

LAN and TAM each currently runpreviously ran their own frequent flyer programs. While LANLATAM intends to integrate these programs so that passengers can use frequent flyer miles earned with either LAN or TAM interchangeably, there is no guarantee that this integration will be completed in the near term or at all. Even if the integration occurs, the successful integration of these programs will involve some time and expense. Until LANLATAM effectively combines these programs, passengers may prefer frequent flyer programs offered by other airlines, which may adversely affect our business.

LATAM will have to withdraw from an existing airline alliance to which LAN or TAM belongs no later than April 2014.

LAN is currently a member of the oneworldoneworld® airline alliance while TAM is a member of the Star Alliance airline alliance. Although LAN and TAM will continue operatingto operate under their existing, separate operating certificates afterfollowing the proposed combination, due to conditions imposed by the Chilean and Brazilian antitrust regulators, LAN and TAM may not participate in more than one airline alliance after April 2014. LATAM announced in March 2013, that TAM will leave the endStar Alliance and become a member of the 24-month period following completion of the proposed combination. LAN and TAM are currently evaluating and have not decided yet to whichoneworld® airline alliance they will belong afterduring the completionsecond quarter of 2014, in order to fulfill a requirement imposed on LATAM by the proposedChilean and Brazilian antitrust authorities in connection with the combination with TAM. The withdrawal from one of the alliances after the proposed combinationStar Alliance may impede LATAM from providing customers with exactly the same benefits currentlypreviously provided by LAN and TAM, such as the same travel destinations, combined reservation system, itinerary flexibility, among others. As a result, passengers may prefer alliances offered by LATAM’s competitors, and consequently decide to fly with them, which may adversely affect LATAM’s business.

Risks Related to our Operations and the Airline Industry

Our performance is heavily dependent on economic conditions in the countries in which we do business and negative economic conditions in those countries could have an adverse impact on our business.

Passenger and cargo demand is heavily cyclical and highly dependent on global and local economic growth, economic expectations and foreign exchange rate variations, among other things. In the past, our business has been negatively affected by global economic recessionary conditions, weak economic growth in Chile, recession in Argentina and poor economic performance in certain emerging market countries in which we operate. The occurrence of similar events in the future could adversely affect our business. In fact, starting as of late 2008, and during 2009, many of the countries we serve, including Chile, experienced economic slowdowns or recessions,

which translated into a substantial weakening of passenger and cargo demand. We plan to continue to expand our operations based in Latin America and our performance will, therefore, continue to depend heavily on economic conditions in the region. Any of the following factors could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in the countries in which we operate:

 

changes in economic or other governmental policies;

 

weak economic performance, including, but not limited to, low economic growth, low consumption and/or investment rates, and increased inflation rates; or

 

other political or economic developments over which we have no control.

Driven by the severe downturn in the global economy, including in the economies of many of the countries we serve, we began to experience weakening demand in cargo late in 2008, and this weak demand continued into 2009. However, we began to experience a recovery in cargo traffic in late 2009, which continued improving during 2010 and 2011. If the regional economic environment continues its positive performance, demand in cargo may continue to grow during the current year. No assurance can be given that capacity reductions or other steps we may take in response to weakened demand will be adequate to offset any future reduction in our cargo and/or air travel demand. Sustained weakened demand may adversely impact our revenues, results of operations or financial condition.

The success of ourOur business depends upon keyis highly regulated and changes in the regulatory issues and these issuesenvironmental in which we operate may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our business is highly regulated and depends substantially upon the regulatory environment in the countries in which we operate or intend to operate. For example, price controls on fares may limit our ability to effectively apply customer segmentation profit maximization techniques (“passenger revenue management”) (management techniques utilizing passenger demand forecasting and fare mix optimization techniques to maximize profit for an airline) and adjust prices to reflect cost pressures. High levels of government regulation may limit the scope of our operations and our growth plans, especially in the event of deterioration of the relations between the countries in which we operate or the public perception of foreign companies in local markets. Accordingly, regulatory issues could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected if we or certain aviation authorities (among them, those from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Colombia andin the United States)countries served by our airlines fail to maintain the required foreign and domestic governmental authorizations. In order to maintain the necessary authorizations issued by the ChileanJunta Aeronáutica Civil(“JAC”) and technical operative authorizations issued by the ChileanDirección General de Aeronáutica Civil(“DGAC”), and other corresponding local authorities of the countries in which we operate, we must continue to comply with applicable statutes, rules and regulations pertaining to the airline industry, including any rules and regulations that may be adopted in the future.

We depend on strategic alliances or commercial relationships in many of the countries in which we operate and our business may suffer if any of our strategic alliances or commercial relationships terminates.

In many of the jurisdictions in which we operate, we have found it in our interest to maintain a number of alliances and other commercial relationships. These alliances or commercial relationships allow us to enhance our network and, in some cases, to offer our customers services that we could not otherwise offer. If any of our strategic alliances or commercial relationships and, in particular, with American Airlines, Iberia, Qantas oroneworldoneworld®, Japan Airlines, Korean Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Alaska Airlines deteriorates, or any of these agreements are terminated, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected. By requirement of the antitrust authorities in Chile, LATAM is required to withdraw from an existing airline alliance, to which LAN or TAM belongs by April 2014. To comply with this requirement on March 2013 LATAM Airlines announced that TAM will leave the Star Alliance to joinoneworld® in the second quarter of 2014.

Our business and results of operation may suffer if we fail to obtain and maintain routes, suitable airport access, slots and other operating permits.

Our business depends upon our access to key routes and airports. Our operations could be constrained by any delay or inability to gain access to key routes or airports, including:

 

limitations on our ability to process more passengers;

the imposition of flight capacity restrictions;

 

the inability to secure or maintain route rights in local markets or under bilateral agreements; or

 

the inability to maintain our existing slots and obtain additional slots.

We operate numerous international routes, subject to bilateral agreements, and also internal flights within Chile, Peru, Brazil, Argentina, PeruEcuador, Colombia and other countries, subject to local route and airport access approvals. Bilateral aviation agreements as well as local aviation approvals frequently involve political and other considerations outside of our control. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation—Route Rights”.Regulation.”

There can be no assurance that existing bilateral agreements between the countries in which our companies are based and permits from foreign governments will continue. A modification, suspension or revocation of one or more bilateral agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The suspension of our permission to operate in certain airports or destinations or the imposition of other sanctions could also have a material adverse effect. We cannot assure that aA change in a foreign government’sthe administration of current laws and regulations or that the adoption of new laws and regulations will notin any of the countries in which we operate that restricts our route, airport or other access may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to obtain favorable take-off and landing authorizations at certain high-density airports, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain all requested authorizations and slots in the future because, among other factors, government policies regulating the distribution of the authorizations and slots are subject to change.

A failure to successfully implement our growth strategy would harm our business and the market value of the ADSs and our common shares.

Our growth strategy involves increasing the frequency of flights to the markets we currently serve and expanding our service to new markets. In order to carry out this strategy, we must be able to identify the appropriate geographic markets upon which to focus and to gain suitable airport access and route approval in these markets. There can be no assurance that the new markets we enter or in which we are seeking to expand our operations will provide passenger and cargo traffic that is sufficient to make our operations in those new markets profitable.

The expansion of our business will also require additional skilled personnel, equipment and facilities. An inability to hire and retain skilled personnel or secure the required equipment and facilities efficiently and cost-effectively may adversely affect our ability to execute our growth strategy. Expansion of our markets and flight frequencies may also strain our existing management resources and operational, financial and management information systems to the point that they may no longer be adequate to support our operations, requiring us to make significant expenditures in these areas.

Our business may be adversely affected by a downturn in the airline industry caused by exogenous events that affect travel behavior or increase costs, such as outbreak of disease, weather conditions and natural disasters, war or terrorist attacks.

Demand for air transportation may be adversely impacted by exogenous events, such as adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, epidemics, terrorist attacks, war or political and social instability. Situations such as these in one or more of the markets in which we operate could have a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, these types of situations could have a prolonged effect on air transportation demand and on certain cost items.

Revenues for airlines depend on the number of passengers carried, the fare paid by each passenger and service factors, such as the timeliness of flight departures and arrivals. During periods of fog, ice, low temperatures, storms or other adverse weather conditions, some or all of our flights may be cancelled or significantly delayed, reducing our revenues. For example, in January 2010, bad weatherextreme floods affected the city of Cuzco in Peru, causing important

human and material damage and severely affecting this tourist destination. This affected our operations, which led us to decrease our capacity in order to improve load factors. We estimateestimated the net impact of decreased passenger operations due to this weather event to have been approximately US$15.0 million.

In addition, on February 27, 2010, an earthquake struck Chile causing major damages mainly in the southern regions of the country. This earthquake damaged the terminal building at the Santiago International Airport causing the suspension of LAN’s passenger services to and from Chile until March 1, 2010. Lan Cargo’s2010 and reduced passenger operations suffered no impact since Lan Cargo has flexibility to redesign itineraries if and when needed. As ofuntil March 28, 2010, operations were restored to normal levels and the airport started to operate normally. As of December 31, 2010, we estimate2010. We estimated the net impact of decreased passenger operations due to the earthquake to have been approximately US$30 million.

In 2011, the Company was also impacted by the presence of volcanic ash on certain routes in Chile and other destinations, which we estimate resulted in US$36.618 million losses.in losses, in addition to forgone revenue.

Terrorist attacks may also have a severe adverse impact on the airline industry. For example, the terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001 substantially affected the airline industry, particularly foreign air carriers operating international service to and from the United States. Throughout South America, passenger traffic also decreased substantially, although the decrease was less severe than that in the United States. The airline industry experienced increased costs following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Airlines have been required to adopt additional security measures and may be required to comply with more rigorous security guidelines in the future.

In addition, fuel prices and supplies, which constitute a significant cost for us, may increase as a result of any future terrorist attacks, a general increase in hostilities or a reduction in output of fuel, voluntary or otherwise, by oil-producing countries. Such increases may result in both higher airline ticket prices and decreased demand for air travel generally, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. Presently, there is a trend towards increases in jet fuel prices because of the increased demand caused by the 2010 recovery in the global economy coupled with conflicts during 2011 in Egypt and Libya that affected global fuel supply. It is impossible for us to predict if we will be able to fully protect ourselves against the volatility of fuel costs.

A significant portion of our cargo revenues comes from relatively few product types and may be impacted by events affecting their production or trade.

Our cargo demand, especially from Latin American exporters, is concentrated in a small number of product categories, such as exports or fish, and sea products and produce exports from Chile and Peru, and exports of fresh flowers from Ecuador and Colombia. Events that negatively affect the production or trade of these goods may adversely affect the volume of goods that we transport and may have a significant impact on our results of operations. Some of our cargo products are sensitive to foreign exchange rates and, therefore, traffic volumes could be impacted by the appreciation or depreciation of local currencies.

In mid 2007, there was an outbreak of infectious salmon anemia virus (“ISA Virus”) in Chile, which was temporarily contained during 2008 but has continued to affect exports since then. The outbreak of ISA Virus has caused, and may continue to cause, a significant decline in salmon exports and has had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on our cargo operations.

Our operations are subject to fluctuations in the supply and cost of jet fuel, which could negatively impact our business.

Higher jet fuel prices or a shortage in the supply of fuel could cause a reduction in our scheduled service and could have a materially negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Jet fuel costs have historically accounted for a significant amount of our operating expenses, and accounted for approximately 34%36.3% of our pro forma operating expenses in 2011.2012. Both the cost and availability of fuel are subject to many economic and political factors and events that we can neither control nor predict. We have entered into fuel hedging arrangements, but there can be no assurance that such arrangements will be adequate to protect us from a significant increase in fuel prices in the near future or in the long term. Also, while these hedging arrangements are designed to limit the effect of an increase in fuel prices, some of our hedging methods may also limit our ability to take advantage of any decrease in fuel prices. Although we have implemented measures to pass a portion of incremental fuel costs to our customers, our ability to lessen the impact of any increase using these types of mechanisms may also be limited.

We rely on maintaining a high daily aircraft utilization rate to increase our revenues, which makes us especially vulnerable to delays.

One of the key elements of our business strategy is to maintain a high daily aircraft utilization rate, which measures the number of flight hours we use our aircraft per day. High daily aircraft utilization allows us to maximize the amount of revenue we generate from our aircraft and is achieved, in part, by reducing turnaround

times at airports and developing schedules that enable us to increase the average hours flown per day. Our rate of aircraft utilization could be adversely affected by a number of different factors that are beyond our control, including air traffic and airport congestion, adverse weather conditions and delays by third-party service providers relating to matters such as fueling and ground handling.

Furthermore, high aircraft utilization rates increase the risk that, if an aircraft falls behind schedule, it could remain behind schedule for up to two days. Such delays could result in a disruption in our operating performance, leading to customer dissatisfaction due to any resulting delays or missed connections.

We fly and depend upon Airbus and Boeing aircraft, and our business is at risk if we do not receive timely deliveries of aircraft, if aircraft from these companies becomes unavailable or if the public negatively perceives our aircraft.

As our fleet has grown, our reliance on Airbus and Boeing has also grown. As of December 31, 2011,February 28, 2013, we operated a fleet of 81241 Airbus, 5475 Boeing and 14 Dash aircraft. These risks include:

 

our failure or inability to obtain Airbus or Boeing aircraft, parts or related support services on a timely basis because of high demand or other factors;

the interruption of fleet service as a result of unscheduled or unanticipated maintenance requirements for these aircraft;

 

the issuance by Chilean or other aviation authorities of other directives restricting or prohibiting the use of Airbus or Boeing aircraft, or requiring time-consuming inspections and maintenance;

 

the adverse public perception of a manufacturer as a result of an accident or other negative publicity; or

 

delays between the time we realize the need for new aircraft and the time it takes us to arrange for Airbus and Boeing or from a third-party provider to deliver this aircraft.

The occurrence of any one or more of these factors could restrict our ability to use aircraft to generate profits, respond to increased demands, or could otherwise limit our operations and adversely affect our business.

We are often affectedhave invested in new Boeing 787 “Dreamliner” aircraft, the operation of which has been delayed as a result of actions taken by certain factors beyond our control, including weather conditions, which can affect our operations.the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”).

Revenues for airlines depend onIn 2012, LATAM received the numberfirst three Boeing 787-8 Dreamliners, and became the first airline in the Americas (and one of passengers carried, the fare paid by each passengerfirst in the world) to operate this modern and service factors, such asefficient aircraft. The incorporation of the timeliness of flight departures and arrivals. During periods of fog, ice, low temperatures, storms or other adverse weather conditions, some or allBoeing 787-8 Dreamliners into our fleet is part of our flights maystrategic objective to incorporate new, modern and fuel efficient aircraft into our existing fleet.

During January 2013, two incidents occurred with Boeing 787 aircraft operated by Japan Airlines, involving a fire risk to the battery of the aircraft. By recommendation of the FAA, LATAM ceased operations of its three Dreamliner aircraft in January 2013. On April 19, 2013, the FAA approved a solution proposed by Boeing to address the battery problems, and subject to the implementation of this corrective solution and approval from safety regulators, LATAM and other airline groups will be cancelled or significantly delayed, reducing our revenues.able to resume operations with Dreamliner aircraft. As of the date of this annual report, LATAM has not yet established a date to resume the operations of the Boeing 787. Delays in the approval of the resumption of operations with the Dreamliner aircraft could occur, and new problems that adversely affect the operation of the Boeing 787 aircraft could be discovered. We cannot assure you when we will be able to resume operations with this aircraft.

Losses and liabilities in the event of an accident involving one or more of our aircraft could materially affect our business.

We are exposed to potential catastrophic losses in the event of an aircraft accident, terrorist incident or any other similar event. There can be no assurance that, as a result of an aircraft accident or significant incident:

 

we will not need to increase our insurance coverage;

 

our insurance premiums will not increase significantly;

 

our insurance coverage will fully cover all of our liability; or

 

we will not be forced to bear substantial losses.

Substantial claims resulting from an accident or significant incident in excess of our related insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, any aircraft accident, even if fully insured, could cause the negative public perception that our aircraft are less safe or reliable than those operated by other airlines, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Insurance premiums may also increase due to an accident or incident affecting one of our airline affiliates or alliance partners or affecting other airlines.

High levels of competition in the airline industry may adversely affect our level of operations.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by high levels of competition within the industry, particularly the entrance of new competitors into the markets in which we operate. Airlines compete primarily over fare levels, frequency and dependability of service, brand recognition, passenger amenities (such as frequent flyer programs) and the availability and convenience of other passenger or cargo services. New and existing airlines could enter our markets and compete with us on any of these bases. Several of our competitors are larger than us and havebases, including by offering lower prices, more attractive services or increasing their route capacities in an effort to gain greater brand recognition and greater resources than we do.market share. Competing carriers include investor-owned, government-subsidized and national flag carriers of foreign countries as well as low-cost carriers offering discounted fares. The U.S. -ChileU.S.-Chile and other open skies agreements may subject us to

further competition from international carriers. In addition, the Brazilian Government is considering raising the regulatory limitation on foreign capital investments in the Brazilian airline industry from 20% to 49% of voting capital, which could lower barriers to entry and increase competition in this market.

In addition to traditional competition among airline companies, we face competition from companies that provide ground transportation, especially in our domestic cargo and passenger businesses, as well as sea transportation for our cargo business. Competition could reduce our passenger traffic and cargo demand, forcing us to reduce our fare levels, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and level of operations.

Chile may open its domestic aviation industry to foreign airlines without restrictions, which may change the competitive landscape of the domestic Chilean aviation sector and affect our business and results of operations

Currently, Chilean laws and regulations permit foreign airlines to operate domestic flights in Chile. Nevertheless, the rules currently prevent foreign-based carriers from flying within Chile without setting up a Chilean subsidiary first. There are currently no foreign airlines participating in the Chilean domestic market. However, on January 18, 2012, both the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Economics of Chile announced steps towards unilaterally opening the Chilean domestic skies in the near term. Chilean Domestic Unilateral Open Skies Rule may change the competitive landscape of the Domestic Chilean Aviation Sector, as it will be easier for foreign companies in the future to freely operate in the Chilean territory, which may subject us to further competition. Competition from international carriers in the Chilean market may affect the competitive dynamics of our industry by reducing our passenger traffic and cargo demands, forcing us to reduce our fare levels, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and level of operations.

A recent proposal by the Brazilian government would result in the reallocation of certain takeoff and landing slots at Brazilian airports; if this proposal is enacted in its current form, it would reduce our access to important airport infrastructure and adversely affect our results of operations.

The Brazilian government has proposed, but has not yet implemented, regulations to reallocate existing takeoff and landing slots at major airports in Brazil from TAM and our competitor, GOL, to smaller airlines and new market entrants, in order to stimulate small airline access to airport infrastructure. These proposed regulations also focus on operational efficiency, and require airlines to meet specified punctuality and frequency benchmarks. We rely on access to takeoff and landing slots at the Guarulhos and Congonhas airports in Sao Paolo, as well as other major airports in Rio de Janeiro and throughout Brazil, to conduct our Brazilian passenger operations. The reallocation of any of our slots to other market participants could adversely affect our operations, particularly at the Congonhas airport where we currently utilize almost half of the existing slots to service our scheduled capacity.

Some of our competitors may receive external support which could negatively impact our competitive position.

Some of our competitors may receive support from external sources, such as their national governments, which may be unavailable to us. Support may include, among others, subsidies, financial aid or tax waivers. This support could place us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our operations and financial performance.

If we are unable to incorporate leased aircraft into our fleet at acceptable rates and terms in the future, our business could be adversely affected.

A large portion of our aircraft areis subject to long-term operating leases. Our operating leases typically run from three to twelve years from the date of delivery. We may face more competition for, or a limited supply of, leased aircraft, making it difficult for us to negotiate on competitive terms upon expiration of our current operating leases or to lease additional capacity required for our targeted level of operations. If we are forced to pay higher lease rates in the future to maintain our capacity and the number of aircraft in our fleet, our profitability could be adversely affected.

We are incorporating various new technologies and equipment and their phase-in may have a negative impact on our service and operating standards.

In recent years we have decided to incorporate a number of new aircraft, equipment and systems. The decision to incorporate these new elements has been based on their potential to enhance customer satisfaction, increase efficiency and/or streamline processes. However, the phase-in of these elements may temporarily result in lower service and operating standards, which could affect how our customers perceive us and have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our business may be adversely affected if we are unable to meet our significant future financing requirements.

We require significant amounts of financing to meet our aircraft capital requirements and may require additional financing to fund our other business needs. We cannot guarantee that we will have access to or be able to arrange for financing in the future on favorable terms. If we are unable to obtain financing for a significant portion of our capital requirements, our ability to acquire new aircraft or to expand operations could be impaired and our business negatively affected.

Our business may be adversely affected by our high degree of debt and aircraft lease obligations compared to our equity capital.

We have a high degree of debt and payment obligations under our aircraft operating leases compared to equity capital. In order to finance our debt, we depend in part on our cash flow from operations. In the combination of LAN and TAM, the LATAM Airlines Group assumed debt and payment obligations, including under aircraft lease

obligations, of TAM, and as a result we have significantly increased our leverage. We cannot assure you that in the future we will be able to meet our payment obligations. In addition, the majority of our property and equipment is subject to liens securing our indebtedness. In the event that we fail to make payments on the secured indebtedness, creditors’ enforcement of liens could limit or end our ability to use the affected property and equipment to fulfill our operational needs and thus generate revenue.

Variations in interest rates may have adverse effects on our interest payments business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and the trading price of our ADRs and BDRs and preferred shares.

We are exposed to the risk of interest rate variations, principally in relation to the U.S. dollar London Interbank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”), as well as the Long Term Interest Rate (Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo, or TJLP), with respect to TAM’s loans denominated in reais. Many of our operating and financial leases are denominated in U.S. dollars and bear interest at a floating rate. Following the combination of LAN and TAM, LATAM is more exposed to fluctuations of interest rates, as more than half of TAM’s outstanding debt, principally, its financial leases, as well as its operating leases, bears interest at a floating rate. On a combined basis, approximately 62% of LATAM’s outstanding debt as of December 31, 2012 bears interest at a floating rate, 62% of which is hedged to a fixed rate using derivative instruments.

Volatility in LIBOR or the TJLP could increase our periodic interest and lease payments and have an adverse effect on our total financing costs. We may be unable to adequately adjust our prices to offset any increased financing costs, which would have an adverse effect on our revenues and our results of operations.

In addition, concerns have been expressed that some of the member banks surveyed by the British Bankers’ Association (the “BBA”) in connection with the calculation of LIBOR rates may have been under-reporting the interbank lending rates applicable to them in order to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may result from reporting higher interbank lending rates. Some member banks have admitted to under-reporting, and under-reporting may have resulted in LIBOR rates being artificially low. The BBA in June 2008 announced changes to the LIBOR rate-fixing process including tighter scrutiny of rates contributed by member banks into the rate-fixing mechanism and increasing the number of institutions surveyed to set LIBOR rates, and is continuing its consideration of ways to strengthen the oversight of the rate calculation process. Actions by the BBA, regulators or law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined. Uncertainty as to the nature of any potential changes in, or volatility in the calculation of, LIBOR may adversely affect our interest and lease payments for obligations which bear interest using LIBOR as a reference rate, including our fleet financing arrangements.

Increases in insurance costs and/or significant reductions in coverage could harm our financial condition and results of operations.

Major events affecting the aviation insurance industry (such as terrorist attacks, hijackings or airline crashes) may result in significant increases of the airlines’ insurance premium or in significant decreases of insurance coverage, as it happenedocurred after the 9/September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Increases in insurance costs and/or significant reductions in coverage could harm our financial condition and results of operations.

Problems with air traffic control systems or other technical failures could interrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our operations, including our ability to deliver customer service, are dependent on the effective operation of our equipment, including our aircraft, maintenance systems and reservation systems. Our operations are also dependent on the effective operation of domestic and international air traffic control systems and the air traffic control infrastructure in the markets in which we operate. Equipment failures, personnel shortages, air traffic control problems and other factors that could interrupt operations could adversely affect our operations and financial results as well as our reputation.

Our financial success depends on the availability and performance of key personnel, who are not subject to non-competition restrictions.

Our success depends to a significant extent on the ability of our senior management team and key personnel to operate and manage our business effectively. Our employment agreements with key personnel do not contain any non-competition provisions applicable upon termination. Competition for highly qualified personnel is intense. If we lose any executive officer, senior manager or other key employee and are not able to obtain an adequate replacement, or if we are unable to attract and retain new qualified personnel, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our business may experience adverse consequences if we are unable to reach satisfactory collective bargaining agreements with our unionized employees.

Approximately 49%As of ourDecember 31, 2012 approximately 20% of LATAM’s employees, including administrative personnel, cabin crews, flight attendants, pilots and maintenance technicians are members of unions and have contracts and collective bargaining agreements which expire on a regular basis. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by a failure to reach agreement with any labor union representing such employees or by an agreement with a labor union that contains terms that are not in line with our expectations or that prevent us from competing effectively with other airlines.

PressureCollective action by employees could cause operating disruptions and negatively impact our business.

Certain employee groups such as pilots, flight attendants, mechanics and our airport personnel have highly specialized skills. As a consequence, actions by these groups, such as strikes, walk-outs or stoppages, could severely disrupt our operations and negatively impact our operating and financial performance, as well as how our customers perceive us.

For example, during the third quarter of 2001, members of one of our pilot unions implemented a series of actions that disrupted our services prior to the negotiation of their collective bargaining agreement, which had a negative impact on our operations and our profitability.

Increases in our labor costs, which constitute a substantial portion of our total operating costs,expenses, could directly impact our earnings.

Labor costs constitute a significant percentage of our total operating costs (19.6%expenses (19.7% in 2011),2012 on a pro forma basis) and at times in our operating history we have experienced pressure to increase wages and benefits for our employees. A significant increase in our labor costs above the assumed costs could result in a material reduction in our earnings.

We may experience difficulty finding, training and retaining employees.

Our business is labor intensive. We employ a large number of pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians and other operating and administrative personnel. The airline industry has, from time to time, experienced a shortage of qualified personnel, specifically pilots and maintenance technicians. In addition, as is common with most of our competitors, we may, from time to time, face considerable turnover of our employees. Should the turnover of employees, particularly pilots and maintenance technicians, sharply increase, our training costs will be significantly higher. We cannot assure you that we will be able to recruit, train and retain the qualified employees that we need to continue our current operations or replace departing employees. A failure to hire and retain qualified employees at a reasonable cost could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

FailureThe regulatory structure of Brazilian civil aviation is undergoing change and we have not yet been able to complyevaluate the results of this change on our business and results of operations.

Scheduled air transportation services are considered public utilities in Brazil and are subject to extensive regulation by the Brazilian government. Over recent years, the Brazilian regulatory authorities have taken a more proactive role in monitoring the development of the Brazilian civil aviation market. For example, in an effort to prevent excess supply, the authorities have established rigorous criteria for air transport companies to follow when creating new routes or increasing flight frequencies. Various legislative initiatives have taken place, including the drafting of a bill to amend the Brazilian Aeronautics Code, Law No. 7,565 of December 19, 1986, the establishment of ANAC, the national aviation agency that replaced the Departamento de Aviação Civil, or “DAC,” as the principal regulatory body for Brazilian civil aviation, and the Civil Aviation Secretariat (Secretaria de Aviação Civil), or SAC, created on March 18, 2011 pursuant to Provisory Measure (Medida Provisória) No. 527, or Provisory Measure No. 527. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation—Brazil—Route Rights.”

Operation of air transportation services, as well as airport infrastructure, is an exclusive right of the Brazilian government, which may choose to provide these services directly or through third parties by means of concessions or permits. TAM’s concession to operate public air transportation was obtained on December 9, 1996 and renewed on December 9, 2011, and it is valid until December 9, 2021. We cannot assure you that we will be able to automatically renew TAM’s concession when it expires. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation—Brazil—Aeronautical Regulation.”

Additionally, our capacity to grow our Brazilian operations is dependent on receiving the necessary authorizations from ANAC and the Bureau of International Relations (Superintendência de Relações Internacionais, or “SRI”). We cannot assure you that we will obtain all necessary authorizations in the future and any failure to do so would require us to re-evaluate our strategies.

The Brazilian civil aviation structure may change significantly in the future and we may not be able to anticipate or evaluate how this change will affect our business and results of operations. We cannot assure you that these or other changes in Brazilian civil aviation regulations will not have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations. Any change that requires us to focus a significant level of resources on compliance with new aviation regulations, for example, would result in additional expenditure on compliance and consequently adversely affect our results of operations.

In addition, our ability to increase prices to offset an increase in our fixed expenses may be adversely affected in the event that the Brazilian civil aviation authorities impose price control restrictions on air transportation services. If we are unable to adequately increase prices to offset increases in fixed expenses, this would adversely affect our results of operations. Changes in the regulations issued by the Brazilian government or the occurrence of any of the above factors may increase our expenses, limit our capacity to expand our routes or adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our operations are subject to local, national and international environmental regulations; costs of compliance with applicable environmental regulations, or the consequences of noncompliance, could adversely affect our results, our business andor our reputation.

Our operations are covered by environmental regulations at local, national and international levels. These regulations cover, among other things, emissions to the atmosphere, disposal of solid waste and aqueous effluents, aircraft noise and other activities incident to our business. Future operations and financial results may vary as a result of such regulations. Compliance with these regulations and new or existing regulations that may be applicable to us in the future could increase our cost base and adversely affect our operations and financial results. In addition, failure to comply with these regulations could adversely affect us in a variety of ways, including adverse effects on our reputation.

The European Union (“EU”) has adopted a directive under which the existing emissions trading scheme (the “ETS”) in each EU member state is to be extended to airlines. This directive would require us to submit annual emission allowances in order to operate routes to and from EU member states. The ETS’s application to flights was

scheduled to begin in 2012, however, its implementation to international flights has been delayed by the EU and the EU is not expected to collect allowances from airlines in 2013 (it was enforced with respect to airlines that conducted intra-European flights during 2012). Although it is uncertain when and if the ETS will be implemented, it is increasingly likely that we will be required to participate in some form of an international aircraft emissions program in the future. Currently, we operate 6 routes to and from Europe, and service additional destinations through our code-share agreements. The cost of compliance with any international emissions program, including the ETS, is difficult to estimate; however, these costs could be significant and could require us to reduce our emissions, purchase allowances or otherwise pay for our emissions, which could have a significant impact on our operating costs or impact the frequency of our flights to and from EU member states.

Risks Related to Chile, Brazil and Other Emerging Market Countries in which we Operate

Developments in Latin American countries and other emerging market countries may adversely affect the Chilean economy, negatively impact our business and results of operations and cause the market price of our common shares and ADSs to decrease.

We conduct a significant portion of our operations in emerging market countries, particularly in Latin America. As a result, economic and political developments in these countries, including future economic crises and political instability, could impact the Chilean economy or the market value of our securities and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Beginning late 2008, and continuing during 2009, many of the countries we serve, including Chile, experienced economic slowdowns or recessions, which resulted in a substantial weakening of demand. Although economic conditions in other emerging market countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Chile, we cannot assure that events in other countries, particularly other emerging market countries, will not adversely affect the market value of, or market for, our common shares or ADSs.

Fluctuations in the value of the Chilean peso and other currencies in the countries in which we operate may adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

We operate in numerous countries and face the risk of variation in foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar or between the currencies of these various countries. Changes in the exchange rate between the Chilean peso and the U.S. dollar or other currencies in the countries in which we operate could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We operate in numerous countries and face the risk of variation in foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar or between the currencies of these various countries. Approximately 99%97% of our indebtedness at December 31, 20112012 is

denominated in U.S. dollars, 22%and 46% of our revenues and 47%58% of our operating expenses in 20112012 were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, mainly the Chilean peso. Ifpeso and the Brazilian real.If the value of the peso, or of other currencies in which revenues are denominated, declines against the U.S. dollar, we will need more pesos or other local currency to repay the same amount of U.S. dollars. The Chilean peso has experienced volatility in recent years, including an average nominal depreciation of 1.3% against the U.S. dollar in 2008, an average nominal depreciation of 4.7% against the U.S. dollar in 2009 and an average nominal appreciation of 4.6% against the U.S. dollar in 2010.2010, an average nominal appreciation of 5.3% against the U.S. dollar in 2011 and an average nominal depreciation of 0.7% against the U.S. dollar in 2012.

Following the combination of LAN and TAM, our exposure to the Brazilian real has increased, as a significant proportion of TAM’s revenues are denominated in reais. The Brazilian real has also experienced volatility and depreciated frequently over the past decade, including depreciation of 25.5% against the U.S. dollar in 2008, appreciation of 25.5% and 4.3% against the U.S. dollar in 2009 and 2010, respectively, and a depreciation of 12.6% against the U.S. dollar in 2011. In 2012, the Brazilian real depreciated by 16.7%. The exchange rate of the Chilean peso, Brazilian real and other currencies against the U.S. dollar may fluctuate significantly in the future. Changes in Chilean, Brazilian and other governmental economic policies affecting foreign exchange rates could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the return to our shareholders on their common shares or ADSs.

Exchange controls in Venezuela delay our ability to repatriate cash generated from operations in Venezuela. They also increase our exposure to exchange rate losses due to potential devaluations of the Venezuelan bolivarvis à vis the U.S. dollar during the period of time between the time we are paid in Venezuelan bolivares and the time we are able to repatriate such revenues in U.S. dollars. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—LAN’s Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2011 compared to year ended December 31, 2010—Cost2010.” As of Sales” and “—Year ended December 31, 2010 compared2012, the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar had a cash impact of US$10.6 million on our results.

The Brazilian government has exercised, and may continue to year ended December 31, 2009—Costexercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy, which may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of Sales”.operations.

The Brazilian economy has been characterized by the significant involvement of the Brazilian government, which often changes monetary, credit, fiscal and other policies to influence Brazil’s economy. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement other policies have involved wage and price controls, depreciation of the real, controls over remittance of funds abroad, intervention by the Central Bank to affect base interest rates and other measures. We have no control over, and cannot predict what measures or policies the Brazilian government may take in the future. Following the combination of LAN and TAM, our operations in Brazil have increased significantly. As a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, and the trading price of our common shares and ADSs, may be adversely affected by changes in Brazilian governmental policies relating to Brazilian economic growth, inflation, interest rates, exchange control policies, fiscal policy and changes in tax law, liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets, government control of oil production activities and oil refinement and other general economic factors.

We cannot predict what future fiscal, monetary, social security or other policies will be adopted by current or future Brazilian governments, or whether these policies will adversely affect the Brazilian economy. In addition, possible political crises may affect the confidence of investors and the public in general, which may result in economic deceleration and affect the trading prices of securities issued by Brazilian companies.We are not required to disclose as much information to investors as a U.S. issuer is required to disclose and, as a result, you may receive less information about us than you would receive from a comparable U.S. company.

The corporate disclosure requirements that apply to us may not be equivalent to the disclosure requirements that apply to a U.S. company and, as a result, you may receive less information about us than you would receive from a comparable U.S. company. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The disclosure requirements applicable to foreign issuers under the Exchange Act are more limited than the disclosure requirements applicable to U.S. issuers. Publicly available information about issuers of securities listed on Chilean stock exchanges also provides less detail in certain respects than the information regularly published by listed companies in the United States or in certain other countries. Furthermore, there is a lower level of regulation of the Chilean securities markets and of the activities of investors in such markets as compared with the level of regulation of the securities markets in the United States and in certain other developed countries.

Risks Related to our Common Shares and ADSs

Our controlling shareholders may have interests that differ from those of our other shareholders.

We have two groups of major shareholders—the Cueto Group (the “LATAM Controlling Shareholders”) and the Amaro Group (the “TAM Controlling Shareholders”). As of January 31, 2012 our controlling shareholders,February 28, 2013, the LATAM Controlling Shareholders, in the aggregate, beneficially owned 33.9%25.68% of our voting common shares, and the TAM Controlling Shareholders, in the aggregate, beneficially owned 13.56% of our voting common shares. The LATAM Controlling shareholdersShareholders are in a position to elect fourthree of the nine members of our board of directors and are in a position to direct our management. In addition, underthe LATAM Controlling Shareholders have entered into a shareholders agreement with the TAM Controlling Shareholders, pursuant to which these controlling shareholders have agreed to vote together to elect individuals that the TAM Controlling Shareholders nominate to our board of directors. See “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.”

Under the terms of the deposit agreement governing the ADSs, if holders of ADSs do not provide JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as depositary for the ADSs, with timely instructions on the voting of the common shares underlying their ADRs, the depositary will be deemed to have been instructed to give a person designated by the board of directors the discretionary right to vote those common shares. The person designated by the board of directors to exercise this discretionary voting right may have interests that are aligned with our controlling shareholders, which may differ from those of our other shareholders. Historically, our board of directors has designated its chairman to serve in this role, who currently is Mauricio Amaro.

Trading of our ADSs and common shares in the securities markets is limited and could experience further illiquidity and price volatility.

Chilean securities markets are substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than major securities markets in the United States. In addition, Chilean securities markets may be materially affected by developments in other emerging markets, particularly other countries in Latin America. Accordingly, although you are entitled to withdraw the common shares underlying the ADSs from the depositary at any time, your ability to sell the common shares underlying ADSs in the amount and at the price and time that you wish to do so may be substantially limited. This limited trading market may also increase the price volatility of the ADSs or the common shares underlying the ADSs.

Holders of ADSs may be adversely affected by currency devaluations and foreign exchange fluctuations.

If the Chilean peso exchange rate falls relative to the U.S. dollar, the value of the ADSs and any distributions made thereon from the depositary could be adversely affected. Cash distributions made in respect of the ADSs are received by the depositary (represented by the custodian bank in Chile) in pesos, converted by the custodian bank into U.S. dollars at the then prevailing exchange rate and distributed by the depositary to the holders of the ADRs evidencing those ADSs. In addition, the depositary will incur foreign currency conversion costs (to be borne by the holders of the ADRs) in connection with the foreign currency conversion and subsequent distribution of dividends or other payments with respect to the ADSs.

Future changes in Chilean foreign investment controls and withholding taxes could negatively affect non-Chilean residents that invest in our shares.

Equity investments in Chile by non-Chilean residents have been subject in the past to various exchange control regulations that govern investment repatriation and earnings thereon. Although not currently in effect, regulations of the Central Bank of Chile have in the past required, and could again require, foreign investors acquiring securities in the secondary market in Chile to maintain a cash reserve or to pay a fee upon conversion of foreign currency to purchase such securities. Further, future changes in withholding taxes could negatively affect non-Chilean residents that invest in our shares.

When we established our ADS facility as part of our initial public offering in 1997, there were foreign exchange controls in Chile. At that time, in order to allow the depositary and investors to be able to enter into foreign exchange transactions to repatriate from Chile amounts they received in connection with the deposited shares of common stock (including dividends and proceeds from the sale in Chile of the underlying shares of common stock and any rights with respect thereto), we entered into a foreign investment contract (the “Foreign Investment Contract”) with the Central Bank and the depositary. The Foreign Investment Contract guaranteed ADS investors and the depositary access to the Formal Exchange Market to convert amounts from Chilean pesos into U.S. dollars and to repatriate such amounts.

In 2001, a new Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations (the “New Compendium”) removed exchange controls and many other barriers to investment. However, even though there are no longer foreign exchange controls in Chile, all foreign investment contracts (including the Foreign Investment Contract), continue to remain in full force.

We cannot assure you that additional Chilean restrictions applicable to the holders of ADRs, the disposition of the common shares underlying ADSs or the repatriation of the proceeds from an acquisition, a disposition or a dividend payment, will not be imposed or required in the future, nor could we make an assessment as to the duration or impact, were any such restrictions to be imposed or required. For further information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Foreign Investment and Exchange Controls in Chile”.Chile.”

Our ADS holders may not be able to exercise preemptive rights in certain circumstances.

The Chilean Corporation Law provides that preemptive rights shall be granted to all shareholders whenever a company issues new shares for cash, giving such holders the right to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage. We will not be able to offer shares to holders of ADSs and shareholders located in the United States pursuant to the preemptive rights granted to shareholders in connection with any future issuance of shares unless a registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), is effective with respect to such rights and shares, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. At the time of any rights offering, we will evaluate the potential costs and liabilities associated with any such registration statement in light of any indirect benefit to us of enabling U.S. holders of ADRs evidencing ADSs and shareholders located in the United States to exercise preemptive rights, as well as any other factors that may be considered appropriate at that time, and we will then make a decision as to whether we will file a registration statement. We cannot assure that we will decide to file a registration statement or that such rights will be available to ADS holders and shareholders located in the United States.

ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

General

LanLATAM Airlines Group is a publicly-held stock corporation (sociedad anónima abierta) incorporated underChile-based airline holding company formed by the lawsmerger of LAN of Chile with unlimited duration. Lanand TAM of Brazil in 2012. Following the combination, LAN Airlines isS.A. became “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” and TAM continues to exist as a companysubsidiary of Holdco I and a subsidiary of LATAM . LATAM is primarily involved in the transportation of passengers and cargo.cargo and operates as one unified, merged business enterprise with two separate brands: LAN and TAM.

TheLATAM is a publicly traded corporation listed in the Santiago Stock Exchange (“SSE”), the Valparaiso Stock Exchange, the Chilean Electronic Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the Brazilian Stock Exchange (“Bovespa”).

LATAM’s history goes back to 1929, when the Chilean government founded Lan Airlines (formerly Lan Chile S.A.) in 1929. Lan AirlinesLAN. LAN was a government-owned company from 1929 until its incorporation in 1983. WeThe company began international service to Buenos Aires, Argentina in 1946, to the United States in 1958 and to Europe in 1970. In 1989, the Chilean government sold 51.0% of Lan Airlines’sLAN’s capital stock to Chilean investors and to Scandinavian Airlines System. In 1994, our controlling shareholders together with other major shareholders acquired 98.7% of Lan Airlines’s stock,LAN’s stocks, including the remaining stockstocks held by the Chilean government, in a series of transactions. As of February 29, 2012, our controlling shareholders held 33.9% of our capital stock. For more information about our controlling shareholders, see “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Controlling Shareholders” and “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions”. In 1997, Lan AirlinesLAN was listed on the New York Stock Exchange, becoming the first Latin American airline to trade its ADRs on this financial market.

Since thisOver the past decade, LAN has significantly expanded its operations in Latin America, initiating services in Peru in 1999, in Argentina in 2005 and in Colombia in 2010 through the acquisition of our capital stockAerovias de Integracion Regional, Aires S.A. (dba “LAN Colombia”). The combination of LAN and TAM in 1994June 2012 continued to expand the Company’s operations in Brazil, where TAM is a leading domestic and international airline offering flights throughout Brazil with a strong domestic market share, international passenger services and significant cargo operations. TAM was founded in May 1997 (under the appointmentname CIT—Companhia de Investimentos em Transportes), for the purpose of our current management, we have grown our revenue baseparticipating in, managing and maintained our profitability every year despite significant challenges. Additionally, we have created a comprehensive network acrossconsolidating shareholdings in airlines. TAM began international services to Miami on 1998 and to Europe (Paris) in 1999. In September 2002, the region by forming, together with local partners, or acquiring, passenger affiliatesname was changed to TAM S.A. and its shares began to be publicly traded on Bovespa in June 2005. In 2006 TAM was also listed in the NYSE.

Following the combination, LATAM’s airline holdings include LAN and its subsidiaries in Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, and Colombia and Ecuador; TAM and its subsidiaries, including TAM Linhas Aereas, TAM Mercosur, TAM Airlines (Paraguay) and Multiplus; and LAN Cargo and its regional affiliates, which include ABSA (in Brazil), MasAir (in Mexico) and LANCO (in Colombia).

This association creates one of the largest airline groups in the world in terms of network connections, providing passenger transport services to approximately 135 destinations in 22 countries and cargo affiliatesservices to approximately 145 destinations in Brazil, Mexico26 countries, with a fleet of 330 aircraft and Colombia. In early 2004, we changed our corporate image and started using the “LAN” brand in order to better reflect the common values and attributes present in all the companies forming our network. We have complemented our own network with a set of bilateral alliances with carriers such as Americanalliances. In total, LATAM Airlines IberiaGroup has more than 53,000 employees and Qantas, and have been a memberranks among the top five airlines in the world in terms of theoneworld® alliance since 2000.market capitalization.

Our principal executive offices are located at Presidente Riesco 5711, 20th20th floor, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile and our general telephone number at this location is (56-2) 565-2525. We have designated LANLATAM Airlines Group as our agent in the United States, located at 970 South Dixie Highway, Miami, Florida 33156. Our website address iswww.lan.com. www.latamairlinesgroup.net. Information obtained on, or accessible through, this website is not incorporated by reference herein and shall not be considered part of this annual report. For more information contact Gisela Escobar, Director of Investor Relations at gisela.escobar@lan.com.

Combination of LAN and TAM

On June 22, 2012, LAN and TAM successfully completed an exchange offer resulting in the combination of the two businesses and the creation of LATAM Airlines Group.

The LAN and TAM boards of directors considered a variety of factors in determining to enter into the business combination. The main reasons in favor of the combination were as follows:

Competitive Landscape: LATAM believes that the combination of LAN and TAM will better position the airlines to compete in an increasingly consolidated global airline industry. The combination created the leading airline group in South America with an aircraft fleet that is approximately twice as large as the second largest airline in Latin America. It significantly expanded the global reach of the airlines by bringing together two large passenger networks co-existing with minimal overlap. The pro forma total revenue of LATAM for the year ended December 31, 2012, was US$13,271.1 million, making it one of the largest airlines globally in terms of revenue for that period.

Complementary Operations: LATAM expects to achieve substantial advantages through coordinating flights at LAN and TAM’s complementary hubs in both its passenger operations and cargo business. LATAM expects to expand passenger traffic throughout Latin America by providing customers with the ability to select more destinations with better schedules and routes, while at the same time benefiting from fares that reflect increased economies of scale. By harmonizing the flight schedules of LAN’s and TAM’s complementary passenger networks, LATAM expects to offer passengers more connections, travel alternatives, and new destinations, which LATAM expects to result in increased passenger revenues. The optimization of LAN’s and TAM’s cargo networks through coordinated freight planning and opportunities to deploy new routes is also expected to generate new opportunities for cargo revenue.

Expected Synergies of the Combination: LATAM expects that the business combination will yield potential synergies from revenue increases in the international passenger business, revenue increases in cargo business, and from cost savings.

Shared Values and Common Strategic Vision: LATAM believes that the senior management teams of LAN and TAM share core values of safety, operational excellence, shareholder value creation and world-class customer service and will work together effectively as part of the consolidated group.

Following the combination, on July 18, 2012, the registration of TAM as a publicly listed company in Brazil was cancelled and TAM was delisted from Bovespa.

In order to implement this combination, the TAM controlling shareholders formed four newsociedades anónimas cerradas with limited liability under the laws of Chile: TEP Chile, Holdco I, Holdco II and Sister Holdco. After the transaction was completed, Holdco II and Sister Holdco ceased to exist, and the current ownership and organizational structure of LATAM Airlines Group is as follows:

LOGO

TAM S.A., the holding company, has two significant operating susbsidiaries, TAM Linhas Areas S.A. (“TLA”) and Multiplus S.A.

LATAM Airlines Group has begun integrating its business units and the transformation necessary to achieve the expected merger synergies, including the implementation of adjustments to its commercial practices and alignment of its international and domestic passenger operations. LATAM expects to fully achieve its estimated predicted merger synergies over the next four years; however, the Company’s short term results are expected to continue to reflect the transition costs as the business becomes fully integrated.

Capital Expenditures

For a description of our capital expenditures, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures”.

Proposed Combination with TAM

On August 13, 2010, we jointly announced with TAM that we had entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding relating to the proposed all-stock transaction that would combine the holdings of LAN and TAM under a single parent entity.

On January 18, 2011, we and the LAN controlling shareholders entered into the transaction agreements with TAM, TEP and the TAM controlling shareholders, which set forth the terms and conditions of a proposed business combination of LAN and TAM. For a discussion of how the proposed combination will be implemented and the terms of the transaction agreements, see “—The Transaction Agreements” below.

The Transaction Agreements

This section describes the material terms of the transaction agreements. The rights and obligations of the parties to the transaction agreements are governed by the express terms and conditions of the transaction agreements and not by this summary or any other information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F. The description in this section and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the transaction agreements, as amended, which are incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F. This summary does not purport to be complete and may not contain all of the information about the transaction agreements that is important to you. We encourage you to read the transaction agreements carefully and in their entirety.

Explanatory Note Regarding the Transaction Agreements

The following summary is included to provide you with information regarding the terms of the transaction agreements. This section is not intended to provide you with any factual information about either TAM or LAN. Such information can be found elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F, in the public filings TAM and LAN make with the SEC, and other relevant documents filed or that will be filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed business combination of LAN and TAM. Factual disclosures about TAM or LAN contained in this annual report on Form 20-F or in LAN’s or TAM’s respective public reports filed with the SEC may supplement, update or modify the factual disclosures about TAM and LAN contained in the transaction agreements. The representations, warranties and covenants made in the transaction agreements by TAM and LAN were qualified and subject to important limitations agreed to by TAM and LAN in connection with negotiating the terms of the transaction agreements. In particular, in your review of the representations and warranties contained in the transaction agreements and described in this summary, it is important to bear in mind that the representations and warranties were negotiated with the principal purposes of establishing the circumstances in which a party to the transaction agreements may have the right not to commence the exchange offer if the representations and warranties of the other party proved to be untrue due to a change in circumstance or otherwise, and allocating risk between the parties to the transaction agreements, rather than establishing matters as facts. The representations and warranties may also be subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from those generally applicable to shareholders and reports and documents filed with the SEC and in some cases were qualified by the matters contained in the disclosure schedules that TAM and LAN delivered in connection with the transaction agreements, which disclosures were not reflected in the transaction agreements. Therefore, the representations and warranties and other provisions in the transaction agreements should not be read alone but instead together with the information provided elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F and in the documents incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties, which do not purport to be accurate as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, may have changed since the date of the transaction agreements and subsequent developments or new information qualifying a representation or warranty may have been included in this annual report on Form 20-F. In this annual report on Form 20-F, we refer to January 18, 2011, the date that the parties entered into the transaction agreements as the “signing date.Expenditures.

Overview

To help you better understand the proposed combination and its component steps, set forth below is a description of those steps together with organizational charts that illustrate how the transaction will affect the ownership of LAN and TAM.

Current Ownership of TAM

LOGO

As of March 28, 2012, TAM’s current authorized share capital was R$1,200,000,000, which consisted of 55,816,683 TAM common shares and 100,390,098 TAM preferred shares. The TAM controlling shareholders owned approximately 85.37% of the TAM common shares and 25.09% of the TAM preferred shares as of March 28, 2012 and the remaining TAM shares were held by TAM’s minority shareholders.

Current Ownership of LAN

LOGO

As of March 28, 2012 LAN’s current authorized share capital was 341,000,000 common shares, which consisted of 340,977,309 LAN common shares. The LAN controlling shareholders owned approximately 33.84% of the LAN common shares as of March 5, 2012. For a description of the rights attached to LAN common shares, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association.”

On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the transaction agreements, all or substantially all of the outstanding TAM common shares will be acquired by Holdco I and substantially all of the outstanding TAM preferred shares will be acquired by LAN through a series of transactions and corporate restructurings described below.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the transaction agreements, the proposed combination will be effected as described below:

In June 2011, the TAM controlling shareholders formed four new Chilean companies:

TEP Chile, a new Chilean corporation formed in June 2011,

Holdco I, a new Chilean corporation formed in June 2011,

Holdco II S.A., a new Chilean corporation formed in June 2011 (“Holdco II”), and

Sister Holdco S.A., a new Chilean corporation formed in June 2011 (“Sister Holdco”).

The current ownership of these four new companies is as follows:

the TAM controlling shareholders own 100% of the outstanding shares of TEP Chile,

TEP Chile owns 100% of the voting shares of Holdco I (“Holdco I voting shares”), which class of shares is entitled to essentially all of the voting rights but none of the economic rights in Holdco I,

LAN owns 100% the non-voting shares of Holdco I (“Holdco I non-voting shares”), which class of shares is entitled to essentially all of the economic rights but none of the voting rights in Holdco I,

Holdco I and LAN each own one common share of Holdco II (“Holdco II share”), which collectively represent 100% of the outstanding Holdco II shares, and

TEP Chile and its nominee each own one common share of Sister Holdco (“Sister Holdco share”), which collectively represent 100% of the outstanding Sister Holdco shares.

Holdco II will make an exchange offer in the United States and in Brazil to acquire all of the issued and outstanding:

TAM common shares,

TAM preferred shares, and

TAM ADSs,

in each case that are not owned by the TAM controlling shareholders in exchange for the same number of Holdco II shares.

Immediately before Holdco II accepts for exchange the TAM shares and TAM ADSs tendered into, and not withdrawn from, the exchange offer:

the TAM controlling shareholders will contribute to TEP Chile all of their TAM common shares and all of their TAM preferred shares and will receive additional shares of TEP Chile,

TEP Chile will contribute to Holdco I all of the TAM common shares that it received from the TAM controlling shareholders and will receive Holdco I non-voting shares, and

TEP Chile will contribute to Sister Holdco:

all of the TAM preferred shares that TEP Chile received from the TAM controlling shareholders,

all of the Holdco I non-voting shares that TEP Chile received from Holdco I, and

6.2% of the outstanding Holdco I voting shares,

and will receive a number of Sister Holdco shares equal to the total number of TAM common shares and TAM preferred shares that the TAM controlling shareholders contributed to TEP Chile.

After completion of the steps described in the immediately preceding bullet point, the ownership of TAM will be as follows:

LOGO

After Holdco II accepts for exchange the TAM ADSs and TAM shares tendered into, and not withdrawn from, the exchange offer and immediately before the settlement of the exchange offer, each of Holdco II and Sister Holdco will merge with and into LAN as a result of which:

LAN will be the surviving company of both mergers,

Holdco II and Sister Holdco will cease to exist, and

each Holdco II share (including those that would otherwise have been delivered at the settlement of the exchange offer) and each Sister Holdco share will be converted into 0.90 of a LAN common share.

Promptly after settlement of the exchange offer, LAN will:

contribute to Holdco I any TAM common shares acquired in the exchange offer in exchange for the same number of Holdco I non-voting shares, and

increase its ownership percentage of the outstanding Holdco I voting shares by converting some of its Holdco I non-voting shares into Holdco I voting shares to the percentage that will cause the product of (i) TEP Chile’s ownership percentage of the outstanding Holdco I voting shares and (ii) Holdco I’s ownership percentage of the outstanding TAM common shares to be equal to 80%.

As a result of the foregoing transactions:

Holdco I will own 100% of the TAM common shares that were:

contributed by the TAM controlling shareholders or

acquired pursuant to the exchange offer.

If the transactions described above are successfully completed, then immediately following the completion of these transactions the ownership of the issued and outstanding shares of LAN and TAM will be approximately as shown below. The ownership percentages shown in the chart below were calculated assuming that all holders of TAM shares and TAM ADSs other than the TAM controlling shareholders validly tender their TAM shares and TAM ADSs into, and do not withdraw them from, the exchange offer, that no TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) or LAN shares (including those represented by LAN ADSs and LAN BDSs) are issued after the date of the exchange offer prospectus other than the LAN shares (including those represented by LAN ADSs and LAN BDSs) to be issued pursuant to the exchange offer and the mergers and the TAM controlling shareholders make and pay the TEP Chile subscription by contributing to TEP Chile all TAM shares beneficially owned by them, and TEP Chile pays for the subscriptions of Holdco I shares and Sister Holdco shares by contributing to Holdco I and Sister Holdco all of the TAM shares contributed to it by the TAM controlling shareholders.

LOGO

As a result of the Holdco II merger, each Holdco II share (including those shares to be issued pursuant to the exchange offer) will be converted into 0.90 of a LAN common share. Because the Holdco II merger will occur immediately before the settlement of the exchange offer, holders of TAM shares and TAM ADSs acquired in the exchange offer will receive 0.90 of a LAN common share for each TAM share or TAM ADS so acquired. Holders of TAM shares and TAM ADSs who tender into the exchange offer through the US exchange agent will receive such LAN common shares in the form of LAN ADSs, which will be evidenced by LAN ADRs. Holders of TAM shares who tender their TAM shares in the Auction on Bovespa will receive such LAN common shares in the form of LAN BDSs, which will be evidenced by Brazilian Depositary Receipts (“LAN BDRs”).

As a result of the Sister Holdco merger, each Sister Holdco share will be converted into 0.90 of a LAN common share. Because all of the Sister Holdco shares will be owned by the TAM controlling shareholders indirectly through TEP Chile immediately prior to the Sister Holdco Merger, they will receive LAN common shares for the TAM shares they contributed to TEP Chile at the same exchange ratio as the holders of TAM shares and TAM ADSs acquired in the exchange offer.

If permitted by Brazilian law, TAM will compulsorily redeem all TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) that were not acquired in the exchange offer.

If the exchange offer is completed, the TAM shares will be delisted automatically from Bovespa. If the TAM ADSs are no longer eligible for listing on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the NYSE does not delist them, then TAM intends to request, as it is required to do so by the transaction agreements, that the TAM ADSs be delisted from the NYSE as soon as is reasonably practicable following the effective time of the mergers if permitted by the rules of the NYSE. At the effective time, the LAN BDSs will be listed in Brazil on Bovespa, the LAN common shares will continue to be listed in Chile on theBolsa de Comercio de Santiago(Santiago Stock Exchange) (“SSE”) and in the United States on the NYSE in the form of LAN ADSs, and LAN’s name will be changed to “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.”

TAM Shareholders’ Meeting

At a duly called shareholders’ meeting held on January 3, 2012 (at which the requisite quorum of the qualifying minority shares was present), the holders of qualifying minority shares had the option to select, by vote of a majority of the votes cast at that meeting, one of three recommended appraisal firms or to select Bradesco as the appraiser (the “Appraiser”) and to adopt as the Appraisal Report the appraisal report prepared by Bradesco valuing each of LAN and TAM as of November 23, 2011, in accordance with CVM 361/2002, which was presented at that meeting. At this meeting, the holders of qualifying minority shares unanimously approved Bradesco as the Appraiser and the appraisal report prepared by Bradesco as the Appraisal Report. If the holders of qualifying minority shares had exercised their right under Brazilian law to request that TAM call a special meeting of the shareholders of TAM to vote upon whether or not to request a new appraisal report and to appoint a new appraiser, then TAM would have been required to take all action necessary to establish a record date for, duly call, give notice of, convene and hold such a special meeting no later than 45 days after the request for such special meeting. As discussed below under “—Transaction Agreements—Conditions to Completion of the Exchange Offer” it is a condition to the completion of the exchange offer that, since the commencement date, no appraisal event has occurred, the holders of the qualifying minority shares shall have not requested a new appraisal report and a new appraiser in accordance with Brazilian law and the holders of the qualifying minority shares shall no longer have the right to request a new appraisal report or a new appraiser. The period during which the holders of qualifying minority shares had the right to request a new appraisal report and a new appraiser under Brazilian law has expired, so the holders of qualifying minority shares no longer have the right to exercise these rights.

TAM Representations and Warranties

TAM made customary representations and warranties that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications and the matters contained in the disclosure schedule delivered by TAM to LAN pursuant to the exchange offer agreement. These representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

due organization, existence, good standing and authority to carry on the businesses of TAM and its subsidiaries;

market capitalization;

ownership and the absence of encumbrances on ownership of the equity interests of its subsidiaries;

the absence of preemptive or other similar rights or any debt securities that give their holders the right to vote with its shareholders;

its corporate power and authority to enter into, and complete the transactions under, the transaction agreements and the shareholders agreements, provided that certain shareholder approvals are obtained, and the enforceability of such agreements against it;

the absence of violations of, or conflicts with, its governing documents, applicable law and certain agreements as a result of entering into and performing under the transaction agreements and the shareholders agreements;

the required governmental consents, approvals, notices and filings;

its SEC filings since December 31, 2006 and the financial statements included therein;

compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the listing and corporate governance rules and regulations of the NYSE;

its disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting;

the absence of a TAM material adverse effect (as defined below in this section) and the absence of certain other changes or events since December 31, 2009 through the signing date;

the conduct of business in accordance with the ordinary course consistent with past practice since December 31, 2009 through the signing date;

the absence of legal proceedings, investigations and governmental orders against it or its subsidiaries;

the absence of certain undisclosed liabilities;

employee benefit plans;

certain employment and labor matters;

compliance with applicable laws and regulations, governmental orders and all applicable operating certificates, air carrier obligations, airworthiness directives, aviation regulations and other similar rules and regulations, of any airline regulator applicable to it, its rights or other assets or its businesses or operations;

aircraft owned, leased and/or operated by TAM and its subsidiaries;

takeoff and landing slots, authorizations and similar rights of TAM and its subsidiaries;

environmental matters;

tax matters;

intellectual property;

the receipt of a fairness opinion from BTG Pactual;

transactions with affiliates;

information provided for inclusion in the US offering documents and Brazilian offering documents;

the absence of any undisclosed broker’s or finder’s fees; and

material contracts and the absence of any default under any material contract.

Many of TAM’s representations and warranties are qualified by, among other things, exceptions relating to the absence of a “TAM material adverse effect,” which means any change, effect, occurrence or circumstance which, individually or in the aggregate, (i) has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations, assets or liabilities of TAM and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than (x) any such change, effect, occurrence or circumstance to the extent resulting from (A) any changes after the signing date in general economic or financial market conditions, (B) any changes after the signing date generally affecting the industries in which TAM and its subsidiaries operate, (C) changes after the signing date in IFRS or the interpretation thereof, (D) geopolitical conditions, the outbreak of a pandemic or other widespread health crisis, the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, any acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, or any escalation or worsening of any such acts of war, sabotage or terrorism threatened or underway as of the signing date or (E) any hurricane, tornado, flood, earthquake, volcanic eruption or natural disaster; provided, however, that the foregoing clauses (A), (B), (D) and (E) shall not apply to the extent that any such change, effect, occurrence or circumstance disproportionately impacts TAM and/or its subsidiaries compared to other participants in the industries in which TAM and its subsidiaries participate, or (y) any failure, in and of itself, of TAM to meet any internal or analyst projections, forecasts or estimates of revenue or earnings or any decrease in the market price or trading volume of the TAM preferred shares (but the exception in this clause (y) will not apply to the underlying causes of any such failure or decrease or prevent any of such underlying causes from being taken into account in determining whether a TAM material adverse effect has occurred); or (ii) impairs or would reasonably be expected to impair in any material respect the ability of TAM to complete the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements or to perform its obligations under those agreements on a timely basis.

LAN Shareholders’ Meeting

At a meeting held on January 18, 2011, our board of directors approved the transaction agreements and agreed to recommend that our shareholders vote to approve the proposed combination with TAM.

At an Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting held on December 21, 2011, LAN shareholders approved the proposed combination with TAM, subject to (i) the terms and conditions of the transaction agreements; and (ii) the rendering of a final decision by the Chilean Supreme Court with respect to the appeal filed by LAN seeking the amendment or elimination of three of the conditions set forth in the decision issued by the Chilean TDLC with respect to the consultation procedure initiated by Conadecus, a Chilean consumer association (“Conadecus”).

LAN shareholders approved the proposed combination with TAM on the proposed conditions by a broad majority, with over 99.99% of shares present at the meeting. The Shareholders Meeting also approved a change to the Company’s corporate name to “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” or “LATAM”, and other necessary transactions contemplated in the transaction agreements.

LAN Representations and Warranties

LAN made customary representations and warranties that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications and the matters contained in the disclosure schedule delivered by LAN to TAM pursuant to the exchange after agreement. These representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

due organization, existence, good standing and authority to carry on the business of LAN and its subsidiaries;

market capitalization;

ownership and the absence of encumbrances on ownership of the equity interests of its subsidiaries;

the absence of preemptive or other similar rights or any debt securities that give their holders the right to vote with its shareholders;

its corporate power and authority to enter into, and complete the transactions under the transaction agreements and the shareholders agreements, provided that the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding LAN common shares vote to approve the mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements at a duly called and held meeting of the shareholders of LAN, and the enforceability of such agreements against it;

the absence of violations of, or conflicts with, its governing documents, applicable law and certain agreements as a result of entering into and performing under the transaction agreements and the shareholders agreements;

the required governmental consents, approvals, notices and filings;

its SEC filings since December 31, 2006 and the financial statements included therein;

compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the listing and corporate governance rules and regulations of the NYSE;

its disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting;

the absence of a LAN material adverse effect (as defined below) and the absence of certain other changes or events since December 31, 2009 through the signing date;

the conduct of business in accordance with the ordinary course consistent with past practice since December 31, 2009 through the signing date;

the absence of legal proceedings, investigations and governmental orders against it or its subsidiaries;

the absence of certain undisclosed liabilities;

employee benefit plans;

certain employment and labor matters;

compliance with applicable laws and regulations, governmental orders and all applicable operating certificates, air carrier obligations, airworthiness directives, aviation regulations and other rules and regulations, any airline regulator applicable to it, its similar rights or other assets or its businesses or operations;

aircraft owned, leased and/or operated by LAN and its subsidiaries;

takeoff and landing slots, authorizations and similar rights of LAN and its subsidiaries;

environmental matters;

tax matters;

intellectual property;

the receipt of a fairness opinion from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC;

transaction with affiliates;

information provided for inclusion in the US offering documents and Brazilian offering documents;

the absence of any undisclosed broker’s or finder’s fees; and

material contracts and the absence of any default under any material contract.

Many of LAN’s representations and warranties are qualified by, among other things, exceptions relating to the absence of a “LAN material adverse effect,” which means any change, effect, occurrence or circumstance which, individually or in the aggregate, (i) has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations, assets or liabilities of LAN and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than (x) any such change, effect, occurrence or circumstance to the extent resulting from (A) any changes after the signing date in general economic or financial market conditions, (B) any changes after the signing date generally affecting the industries in which LAN and its subsidiaries operate, (C) changes after the signing date in IFRS or the interpretation thereof, (D) geopolitical conditions, the outbreak of a pandemic or other widespread health crisis, the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, any acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, or any escalation or worsening of any such acts of war, sabotage or terrorism threatened or underway as of the signing date or (E) any hurricane, tornado, flood, earthquake, volcanic eruption or natural disaster; provided, however, that the foregoing clauses (A), (B), (D) and (E) shall not apply to the extent that any such change, effect, occurrence or circumstance disproportionately impacts LAN and/or its subsidiaries compared to other participants in the industries in which LAN and its subsidiaries participate, or (y) any failure, in and of itself, of LAN to meet any internal or analyst projections, forecasts or estimates of revenue or earnings or any decrease in the market price or trading volume of LAN common shares (but the exception in this clause (y) will not apply to the underlying causes of any such failure or decrease or prevent any of such underlying causes from being taken into account in determining whether a LAN material adverse effect has occurred); or (ii) impairs or would reasonably be expected to impair in any material respect the ability of LAN to complete the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements or to perform its obligations under those agreements on a timely basis.

Controlling Shareholder Representations and Warranties

The LAN controlling shareholders, the TEP and the TAM controlling shareholders made customary representations and warranties to the other parties pursuant to the exchange offer agreement. These representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

due organization, existence, good standing and authority to carry on their businesses, as applicable;

ownership and absence of encumbrances on their direct or indirect ownership of equity interests of TAM or LAN, as applicable;

its corporate power and authority to enter into, and complete the transactions under, the transaction agreements and shareholders agreements to which they are a party, and the enforceability of such agreements against them, in the case of the TAM controlling shareholder and the LAN controlling shareholders only;

the absence of violations of, or conflicts with, its governing documents, applicable law and certain agreements as a result of it entering into and performing under such agreements;

the required governmental consents, approvals, notices and filings;

the absence of legal proceedings and investigations against it; and

the absence of successor liability resulting from the TEP Chile subscription.

Conduct of Business Pending the Combination

Under the implementation agreement, both we and TAM have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the implementation agreement or as required by applicable law, unless the other party gives its prior written approval between the signing date and the effective time, each of us and our subsidiaries and each of TAM and its subsidiaries will use our commercially reasonable efforts to preserve our business organizations intact and all licenses necessary for us and our respective subsidiaries to own, lease or operate our respective properties, rights and other assets and to carry on our respective business and operations conducted at the signing date and maintain, and keep available the services of our respective current officers, employees and consultants and existing relationships and goodwill with our respective customers, suppliers, employees, strategic partners and other persons with whom we conduct business.

Subject to certain exceptions set forth in the implementation agreement or as required by law, neither we nor TAM will, or will permit our subsidiaries to, take any of the following actions without the other’s written approval:

make, declare or pay any dividend, or make any other distribution, on or in respect of any of its equity securities, other than (A) dividends or distributions paid or made to such party by its wholly owned subsidiary or to another wholly owned subsidiary of such party and (B) regular dividends paid to such party’s shareholders in accordance with the dividend policy approved at the last regular meeting of its shareholders in an amount not to exceed 50% (in the case of LAN) and 25% (in the case of TAM) of such party’s net income for the year in respect of which the dividends are paid;

adjust, split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any of its equity securities or issue or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for its equity securities;

purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any equity securities or convertible securities of such party or any of its subsidiaries or any other securities thereof or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares or other securities, subject to customary exceptions;

issue, deliver, sell, grant, pledge or otherwise encumber or subject to any lien any equity securities or convertible securities of such party or any of its subsidiaries, or any “phantom” stock, “phantom” stock rights, stock option, stock purchase or appreciation rights or stock-based performance units relating to or permitting the purchase of any such equity securities or convertible securities, subject to customary exceptions;

except as otherwise expressly contemplated in the implementation agreement, amend the by-laws of it or its subsidiaries in any way that is or would reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole;

other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, directly or indirectly make, or agree to directly or indirectly make, any acquisition or investment or make any capital expenditures, other than (i) capital expenditures disclosed in such party’s capital plans for 2010 and 2011, (ii) acquisitions of properties or assets that are not material to such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and (iii) certain other customary exceptions;

sell, lease, assign, license, grant, extend, amend, subject to liens, waive or modify any material rights in or to, cancel, abandon or allow to lapse, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, or agree to take or permit any such action, all or any part of its assets, rights or properties which are material, individually or in the aggregate, to such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, subject to certain exceptions;

incur any indebtedness or guarantee indebtedness of another person, other than (i) indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (ii) indebtedness that does not exceed US$10 million in the aggregate and (iii) certain other exceptions;

settle or compromise any claim or action where the amount paid exceeds the amount set forth in such party’s disclosure schedule;

other than in the ordinary course of business, enter into any material contract, terminate or amend in any material respect any material contract or waive, encumber or otherwise transfer any material rights or claims thereunder;

make any material changes to the policies or work rules applicable to any group of employees or labor union;

except as required by applicable law or its existing benefit plans, adopt or enter into, terminate, amend or grant any waiver or consent under any material benefit plan, or other than with respect to the hiring of any person whose annual compensation does not exceed US$500,000, any contract, plan or policy involving any current or former employee, independent consultant, officers, or directors of such party or any of its subsidiaries, except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice with respect to employees who are not key personnel; grant any severance or termination payment or increase compensation or benefits of any employee (except for increases in compensation of employees who are not key personnel made in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice); remove any existing restrictions in any benefit plans; take any action to fund or secure the payment of, or accelerate the vesting or payment of, any compensation or benefits under any benefit plan; except as required by any existing benefit plan and except for normal payments and increases in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, increase in any manner the compensation or fringe benefits of any employee or pay any amount or benefit; or grant any retention or similar bonuses, payments or rights to any employee;

except as required by applicable law, the IFRS or regulatory guidelines, make any material change in its accounting methods or principles; make or change any material tax election; settle any material tax liability; amend any material tax return; enter into any material closing agreement with respect to any tax or surrender any right to claim a material tax refund; or change its current independent auditors;

enter into any new line of business that is material to such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or any related party agreement;

authorize or adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation or any restructuring, recapitalization or reorganization;

enter into or amend any contract that would restrict or limit the ability of LAN, TAM or any of their respective subsidiaries to engage in any business, that would reasonably be expected to prevent or materially impede the commencement or the completion the exchange offer, the mergers or the other transactions contemplated in the implementation agreement or to adversely affect in a material respect the expected benefits (taken as a whole) of the exchange offer and the mergers or if the completion of those transactions would conflict with, result in any breach or default or in any termination or modification of or acceleration under, or any change in any right or obligation under, or result in any lien on any property or asset of such party or any of its subsidiaries under any provisions of such contract;

take or fail to take any action to prevent or delay, or that would reasonably be expected to prevent or delay, the satisfaction of any of the conditions to the commencement or completion of the exchange offer, the mergers or the other transactions contemplated by the implementation agreement;

cancel, terminate or amend any binding financing commitment to fund the acquisition of an aircraft unless it is replaced by another financing agreement with substantially equivalent terms or such party and/or its subsidiaries receives equivalent value from the manufacturer of the applicable aircraft;

enter into or materially amend any aircraft purchase agreement, engine purchase agreement or engine maintenance agreement that involves or is reasonably expected to involve aggregate payments in excess of US$25 million in any twelve-month period;

enter into, amend or terminate any alliance or brand alliance agreement, code-sharing agreement, frequent flyer participation agreement, capacity purchase or similar agreement, cooperation, joint venture, profit or revenue sharing agreement, special prorate agreement or interlining agreement with any person; or

authorize any of, or commit, resolve, propose or agree to take any of, the foregoing actions.

Holdco Shareholders’ Meetings

The TAM controlling shareholders were required to cause Holdco II to (i) take all action necessary to establish a record date for, duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a special meeting of the shareholders of Holdco II (“Holdco II shareholders’ meeting”) for the purpose of voting to approve (i) the Holdco II merger and the other transactions contemplated by the implementation agreement, (ii) the relevant audited financial statements and appraisal report and (iii) the by-laws of the surviving corporation of the Holdco II merger (collectively, “Holdco II merger matters”). Under Chilean law and Holdco II’s by-laws, the Holdco II merger matters must be approved by the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Holdco II stock (“requisite Holdco II shareholder approval”). The requisite Holdco II shareholder approval will be expressly conditioned upon, and will become effective only upon, the completion of the mergers.

The TAM controlling shareholders were also required to cause Sister Holdco to (i) take all action necessary to establish a record date for, duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a special meeting of the shareholders of Sister Holdco (“Sister Holdco shareholders meeting”) for the purpose of voting to approve (i) the Sister Holdco merger and the other transactions contemplated by the implementation agreement, (ii) the relevant audited financial statements and appraisal report and (iii) the by-laws of the surviving corporation of the Sister Holdco merger (collectively, the “Sister Holdco merger matters”). Under Chilean Law and Sister Holdco’s by-laws, the Sister Holdco merger matters must be approved by the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Sister Holdco stock (“requisite Sister Holdco shareholder approval”). The requisite Sister Holdco shareholder approval will be expressly conditioned upon, and will become effective only upon, the completion of the mergers.

Both Holdco II and Sister Holdco shareholders’ meetings were held on December 21, 2011.

Further Actions; Notification

We and TAM have agreed to cooperate with each other and use (and cause our respective affiliates to use) our respective reasonable best efforts to take or cause to be taken all actions and to do or cause to be done all things reasonably necessary, proper or advisable under the transaction agreements and applicable law to satisfy the conditions to the commencement and completion of the exchange offer described below under “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Conditions for the Commencement of the Exchange Offer” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Conditions to the Completion of the Exchange Offer” (collectively, the “exchange offer conditions”) and to complete as soon as reasonably practicable the exchange offer, the mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements in accordance with the terms of the transaction agreements. If any action or proceeding is instituted (or threatened to be instituted) by any person challenging any such transaction, each party is required to cooperate in all respects with the other parties and use its respective reasonable best efforts to contest and resist any such action or proceeding and to have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any decree, judgment, injunction or other order, whether temporary, preliminary or permanent, that is in effect and that prohibits, prevents or restricts completion of such transaction so as to permit such completion by the fifth business day before June 30, 2012. In addition, each party is required to, at its own cost and expense, defend any such actions or proceedings against it or its affiliates in connection with the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements.

Neither we nor TAM nor any of our respective affiliates will be required to sell, transfer, dispose of, or otherwise encumber, or to hold separate pending any such action, or propose, commit or agree to any of the foregoing or to hold separate, either before or after the effective time, any assets, licenses, operations, rights, product lines, businesses or interest of either of us or any of our affiliates or to take or agree to take any other action, or agree or consent to any limitations or restrictions on freedom of actions with respect to, or our ability to own, retain or make changes in, any assets, licenses, operations, rights, product lines, businesses or interests of either of us or

any of our affiliates or our ability to receive and exercise full voting, economic and ownership rights with respect to our interests in Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries, subject only to the rights of the TAM controlling shareholders in respect of its voting shares of Holdco I and under the shareholders agreements.

Each of the parties is required to promptly advise the other parties orally and in writing if it fails to comply with or satisfy in any material respect any covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it under the transaction agreements, if any of the exchange offer conditions or the TAM controlling shareholders subscription conditions (as defined under “—Conditions to the Subscriptions”) fail or cease to be satisfied or if an appraisal event (as defined under—Conditions for the Commencement of the Exchange Offer”) occurs.

No Solicitation

Each of the parties has agreed to cease and immediately terminate all existing activities and discussions with any person conducted prior to the signing date with respect to an alternative proposal concerning its relevant parent entity. In this annual report on Form 20-F, we refer to LAN as the relevant parent entity of LAN and the LAN controlling shareholders, and TAM as the relevant parent entity of TAM and the TAM controlling shareholders, and we refer to any of the following actions or any proposal or exchange offer (including any proposal or exchange offer to or from any representative of any party) with respect to any relevant parent entity by any person or group relating to, or that could reasonably be expected to lead to, any of the following as an “alternative proposal”: (i) any direct or indirect acquisition, lease, license or outsourcing, in one transaction or a series of related transactions, of any assets, services or businesses of such relevant parent entity or any of its subsidiaries collectively representing more than 25% of the fair market value of the total assets of such relevant parent entity or collectively generating or contributing 25% or more of the total consolidated revenues or operating income of such person during the last fiscal year, (ii) any tender exchange offer or exchange offer that, if completed, would result in any person or group beneficially owning any equity securities of such relevant parent entity, or (iii) any business combination, recapitalization, issuance or amendment of securities, liquidation, dissolution, joint venture, share exchange or similar transaction involving such relevant parent entity or any of its subsidiaries.

The parties have agreed not to, and to cause their respective directors, officers, employees, affiliates, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants or other advisors, agents and other representatives and each of the individuals who ultimately beneficially own it, which we refer to collectively as the “representatives” of a party, not to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or encourage any inquiries or the making or completion of any proposal or exchange offer that constitutes, or is reasonably likely to lead to, an alternative proposal with respect to its relevant parent entity, (ii) engage in, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or provide to any person any non-public information or data in connection with, or otherwise cooperate in any way with, any such alternative proposal, (iii) waive, terminate, modify or fail to enforce any provision of any “standstill” or similar obligation of any person, (iv) enter into any binding or non-binding contract with respect to any such alternative proposal, or (v) otherwise knowingly facilitate any effort or attempt to make any such alternative proposal.

The parties have also agreed to:

as promptly as practicable (and in any event within 24 hours after receipt) advise the other parties orally and in writing of the receipt of any alternative proposal relating to its relevant parent entity, the material terms and conditions of such alternative proposal (including any changes thereto) and the identity of the person making such alternative proposal;

keep the other parties fully informed in all material respects of the status and details (including any changes to the terms) of such alternative proposal; and

provide to the other parties as soon as practicable after receipt or delivery thereof copies of all correspondence and other written material sent or provided to it, such relevant parent entity or any of their respective representatives from any person that describes any of the terms or conditions of such alternative proposal.

Stockholder Actions

Both we and TAM have agreed to give the other the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any stockholder action or proceeding against us and/or our directors or officers relating to the transactions contemplated by the implementation agreement and not to agree to settlement of any such action without the other party’s prior written consent.

Controlling Shareholder Covenants

Voting Agreements

The TAM controlling shareholders have agreed to adhere to the following until the termination of the transaction agreements or the effective time of the mergers, whichever event occurs sooner:

cause the TAM common shares and TAM preferred shares beneficially owned by them to be voted against any alternative proposal relating to LAN and any transaction that would reasonably be expected to result in a breach by LAN of the transaction agreements; and

not to transfer the TAM common shares and TAM preferred shares beneficially owned by them, except for certain permitted transfers to affiliates and only if the transferor continues to be, and the transferee agrees to become, bound by the terms of the transaction agreements.

The LAN controlling shareholders have agreed to adhere to the following until the termination of the transaction agreements or the effective time of the mergers, whichever event occurs sooner:

vote their LAN common shares in favor of the approval of the mergers, the name change and the other transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements;

vote their LAN common shares against any alternative proposal relating to LAN and any transaction that would reasonably be expected to result in a breach by LAN of the transaction agreements; and

not to transfer their LAN common shares, except for certain permitted transfers to affiliates and only if the transferor continues to be, and the transferee agrees to become, bound by the terms of the transaction agreements.

In addition, each of the LAN controlling shareholders and the TAM controlling shareholders have agreed that it has not entered into any voting agreement, voting trust or any other agreement, arrangement or obligations (whether or not legally binding) with respect to any of the shares of capital stock of LAN, TAM, the TAM controlling shareholders, Holdco I, Holdco II or Sister Holdco that it beneficially owns and has not granted a proxy, a consent or power of attorney with respect to any such shares and will not take any such actions while the exchange offer agreement remains in effect.

Conditions for the Commencement of the Exchange Offer

Mutual Conditions for the Commencement of the Exchange Offer

The transaction agreements contain conditions for the commencement of the exchange offer in favor of both LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders. Consequently, Holdco II is not permitted to commence the exchange offer unless all of the following conditions are satisfied or waived by both LAN and TAM controlling shareholders as of the date of commencement of the exchange offer:

the requisite LAN shareholder approval has been obtained.

This approval was obtained at LAN’s Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on December 21, 2011. Consequently, this condition has been satisfied. For more information about LAN’s Extraordinary

Shareholders Meeting see “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Lan Shareholders’ Meeting”. However, this approval is subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the transaction agreements and a final ruling for LAN from the Chilean Supreme Court on LAN’s appeal with respect to three conditions set forth in the decision of the TDLC with respect to the consultation procedure initiated on January 28, 2011 by Conadecus, a Chilean consumer association in connection with the proposed combination.

the requisite TAM shareholder approval has been obtained.

This approval was obtained at TAM’s Shareholders Meeting held on December 21, 2011. Consequently, this condition has been satisfied. For more information about TAM Shareholders’ Meeting see “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—TAM Shareholders’ Meeting”.

all required approvals from Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Brazil’s Council for Economic Defence) (“CADE”), Fiscalía Nacional Económica (the Chilean antitrust prosecution agency) (“FNE”), TDLC, the applicable antitrust authorities in Italy, Spain and Germany or any other governmental authorities whose consent is required in connection with the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements (other than those which the failure to obtain, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a TAM material adverse effect or a LAN material adverse effect or to result in criminal or civil sanctions against any party to the transaction agreements, its affiliates or any directors or employees of it (collectively, the “required regulatory approvals”) have been obtained.

As of March 12, 2012, no further required regulatory approvals are needed to complete the exchange offer and the mergers. All the required regulatory approvals have been obtained, as follows:

Chile

On September 21, 2011, the Chilean TDLC issued its decision (“Decision”) with respect to the consultation procedure initiated on January 28, 2011 by Conadecus in connection with the proposed combination with TAM. The persons and entities that were accepted as intervening parties in the consultation procedure, among others, are the following: Conadecus, as consultant, FNE, Sky Airline, Aerolínea Principal de Chile S.A. (“PAL”), ACHET (a Chilean travel agents association), LAN, LAN Cargo and TAM. The Decision of the TDLC approved the proposed combination with TAM with fourteen mitigating measures.

On October 3, 2011, PAL filed an appeal in order to have the Chilean Supreme Court revoke the Decision issued by the TDLC approving the proposed combination subject to certain conditions. On October 25, 2011 LAN reached an extrajudicial agreement with PAL pursuant to which (i) PAL abandoned the appeal before the Chilean Supreme Court and undertook to terminate all actions or proceedings that it initiated, as well as to desist from initiating new proceedings, aimed at blocking the proposed combination between LAN and TAM, and (ii) LAN paid PAL US$5 million.

On October 3, 2011, LAN also filed an appeal seeking the amendment or elimination, as applicable, of the following three conditions set forth in the Decision:

amendment of the seventh condition regarding mandatory prior consultation with the TDLC for the execution of certain codeshare agreements in order to eliminate the obligation to submit such agreements to the prior approval of the TDLC, replacing it with the obligation to notify the FNE of any such agreements.

elimination of the eighth condition regarding the abandonment of certain traffic frequencies and limitation on acquiring certain air traffic frequencies; and

amendment of the fourteenth condition regarding the independent consultant in order to limit and modify the intrusive and inspection powers granted to both the FNE and the consultant with respect to LAN and TAM.

Likewise, on the same date TAM L.A. filed an appeal seeking the amendment of the seventh condition of the Decision. It is expected that the Chilean Supreme Court will render a final decision with respect to the above-mentioned appeals within the next month.

If the seventh condition is not amended, LATAM’s passengers to and from Chile would be denied the benefit of the increased connectivity that would be provided by the codeshare agreements that would require prior approval of the TDLC unless and until such approval was obtained. LATAM’s ability to negotiate existing codeshares and to adapt to changes in the markets in which it has to compete could also be adversely affected because the time required to obtain the prior approval of the TDLC to amendments to those agreements could take longer than is required to adequately react to new conditions.

If the eighth condition is not eliminated, LATAM will be required to cancel or re-route certain flights out of Lima that could adversely impact connectivity of some passengers.

If the fourteenth condition is not amended, the independent consultant and the FNE will have certain inspection powers that in LAN’s opinion could increase administrative burdens and impose additional costs that would not be shared by the other airlines with which LATAM needs to compete. In addition, in LAN’s opinion this condition would undermine LAN’s constitutional rights to equality under the law, due process and protection of mail and document privacy because it would give the independent consultant and FNE intrusive and disproportionate powers solely with respect to LAN and subject LAN to a supervisory regime that would not apply to any other competitor or industry in Chile.

Brazil

On September 3, 2010, LAN and TAM submitted a merger filing before the Brazilian Antitrust System, composed of CADE, theSecretaria de Direito Econômico (Ministry of Justice) (“SDE”) and theSecretaria de Acompanhamento Econômico (Ministry of Finance) (“SEAE”). The filing was made based on the Memorandum of Understanding, executed by the parties on August 13, 2010. As per the request of the parties, the SEAE suspended its analysis of the merger filing until the parties had taken more definitive steps with respect to the proposed combination. On October 21, 2010, the parties informed SEAE of the execution of theInstrumento Particular de Ratificação de Entendimento by the parties on October 12, 2010, pursuant to which the parties agreed on a transaction structure for the proposed combination and requested that SEAE resume its analysis of the merger filing. As part of its analysis, SEAE sent a series of information requests to LAN and TAM (Official Letter Nos. 11.143/2010; 12.203/2010; 6.566/2011; 6.607/2011; 7.218/2011; 7.555/2011; and 7.866/2011) requesting information on the markets affected by the proposed combination. All of these Official Letters were duly answered by LAN and TAM. SEAE also sent information requests to the parties’ competitors, suppliers and clients. SEAE issued its report approving the merger filing without any restrictions on August 11, 2011. The case was then further examined by CADE’s Reporting Commissioner, Olavo Chinaglia, for an additional four months. CADE sent information requests to LAN and TAM (Official Letter Nos. 1830/2011; 1945/2011; 2410/2011; and 2493/2011) to complement SEAE’s analysis. On December 14, 2011, the case was adjudicated in a Plenary Session, where the board of CADE approved the transaction with the following conditions: (i) LAN and TAM cannot be members of more than one global airline alliance; (ii) LAN and TAM must swap two pairs of slots in the International Airport of Guarulhos (São Paulo/Brazil) (“Guarulhos Airport”) with one or more companies that is willing to operate non-stop flights on the São Paulo-Santiago route, granting the swapping companies the necessary infrastructure in the Guarulhos Airport; and (iii) LAN and TAM must publish the contents of the decision in newspapers widely sold in Brazil, and send letters to carriers that operate commercial flights from Guarulhos Airport, informing them of the decision. On December 30, 2011, LAN and TAM submitted a motion to clarify the decision, in which they requested that CADE clarify certain points of the decision. The motion to clarify was partially accepted

by CADE’s Plenary Board, on February 8, 2012, to establish that LAN will not be required to implement the measures imposed by CADE until the exchange offer has been completed. LAN and TAM are permitted to proceed with the implementation of the transaction, regardless of the decision on the remaining points under the motion to clarify.

Argentina

Under Argentine Law No. 25,156, notification of the exchange offer and the mergers must be filed with theComisión Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia (the national antitrust commission of Argentina) (“CNDC”) (i) prior to the perfection or closing of the transaction, or (ii) within one week after the date (a) on which the transaction is closed, (b) the announcement of the commencement of a tender or exchange offer, or (c) the acquisition of a controlling stake, whichever event occurs sooner. The notification to the CNDC is not required in order to complete the exchange offer or the mergers.

On April 4, 2011, the CNDC initiated an investigation to determine whether the transaction would require a filing with the CNDC. LAN filed its response on May 18, 2011, enclosing the information and documentation requested by the CNDC. In its response, LAN stated that none of the conditions for filing the notification as set forth by the Argentinian antitrust regulations were met as of that time, and thus LAN would send the notification to the CNDC at the time required by those regulations.

Argentine law does not prohibit the consummation of the exchange offer or the mergers before the CNDC has granted its approval of the exchange offer and the mergers.

E.U.

LAN and TAM conduct business in a number of countries outside Latin America. In connection with the proposed combination, LAN and TAM identified two jurisdictions in the European Union, Germany and Spain, where a merger control filing is required and where clearance is needed prior to completion of the exchange offer. Filings have been made and unconditional clearances have been secured in Germany in July 2011, and Spain in October 2011. A merger control filing was also made in Italy, and unconditional approval of the Italian competition authority has been obtained in August 2011, although such approval is not required in order to complete the exchange offer and the mergers.

no court or other governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any law or order or taken any other action that (i) makes illegal, restrains or otherwise prohibits the commencement of the exchange offer or the completion of the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement on the terms contemplated by the transaction agreements, or (ii) limits or impairs the ability of the parties to jointly own and operate all or a material portion of TAM and its subsidiaries or exercise full ownership of their equity interests in Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries consistent with the terms of the shareholders agreements (the “restraining orders”).

As of March 12, 2012, no restraining orders have been issued.

no action seeking a restraining order or to limit or impair the ability of the parties to jointly own and operate all or a material portion of TAM and its subsidiaries or exercise full ownership of each of Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries consistent with the terms of the shareholders agreements (other than any action by a person other than a governmental entity that could not reasonably be expected to succeed on its merits) (“adverse actions”).

As of March 12, 2012, no adverse actions have been commenced.

CVM has granted the registrations of LAN and the LAN BDRs representing the LAN common shares to be issued in the mergers on the Bovespa.

As of March 12, 2012, CVM has not yet granted the registrations of LAN and the LAN BDRs representing the LAN common shares to be issued in the mergers on the Bovespa.

the approval for listing the LAN BDRs representing the LAN common shares to be issued in the mergers on the Bovespa, (ii) the approval for listing the LAN ADRs representing LAN common shares to be issued in the mergers on the NYSE, subject to notice of issuance, (iii) the approval for listing the LAN common shares to be issued in the mergers on the SSE and (iv) approvals for any other listings required by governmental entities has been obtained (which we refer to as collectively as the “required listings”) and such listings will become effective no later than the effective time of the mergers.

As of March 12, 2012, we have not yet obtained all of the required listings.

the registration statement on Form F-4 filed in connection with the exchange offer has been declared effective by the SEC under the Securities Act. No stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Form F-4 has been issued by the SEC, and no proceeding for that purpose has been initiated or threatened by the SEC.

On November 15, 2011, the Company filed a registration statement on Form F-4 with the SEC in connection with the exchange offer as part of the proposed combination with TAM. On December 12, 2011, the Company received comments on the Form F-4 in a letter from the staff of the SEC (the “Staff”) to which the Company responded by filing a response letter and Amendment No. 1 to the Form F-4 on February 9, 2012. On February 28, 2012, the Company received additional comments in a second letter from the Staff to which the Company responded by filing a second response letter and Amendment No. 2 to the Form F-4 on March 12, 2012. As of March 13, 2012 the aforementioned registration statement has not been declared effective.

each of the formation and restructuring transactions described and all corporate actions required under applicable law and the terms of the transaction agreements to be taken by LAN and TAM in order to commence the exchange offer and to complete the exchange offer and the mergers has been taken.

As of March 12, 2012, each of the formation and restructuring transactions and all corporate actions required under applicable law and the terms of the transaction agreements have been completed with the exception of the restructuring of TEP.

the product of 0.9 and the high end of the range of economic value of LAN per LAN common share most recently determined by the appraiser approved by the shareholders of TAM is greater than or equal to the low end of the range of economic value of TAM per share of TAM stock as determined by the appraiser at such time, which we refer to as an “appraisal event,” and if the determination was in an appraisal report, the appraisal report has not been replaced by a new appraisal report by a new appraiser at the request of the holders of the outstanding free float shares in accordance with Brazilian law.

As of March 12, 2012, no appraisal events have occurred and the rights of shareholders of TAM under Brazilian law to request a new appraiser or a new appraisal report have expired.

LAN intends to commence the exchange offer immediately after the conditions for the commencement of the exchange offer have been satisfied. The Company expects that to happen within the next month.

LAN Conditions for the Commencement of the Exchange Offer

The transaction agreements contain conditions for the commencement of the exchange offer in favor of LAN. Consequently, Holdco II is not permitted to commence the exchange offer unless all of the following conditions are satisfied by TAM controlling shareholders or waived by LAN as of the date of commencement of the exchange offer:

accuracy in all material respects of the representations and warranties of TAM and the TAM controlling shareholders in the transaction agreements when made and as of the commencement date.

performance in all material respects by TAM and the TAM controlling shareholders of all of their covenants in the transaction agreements required to be performed prior to the commencement date.

absence of a TAM material adverse effect (as defined under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—TAM Representation and Warranties”.

absence of specified market disruptions since the date of the transaction agreements.

approval by the CVM of the exchange offer conditions.

receipt of all shareholder approvals other than those required from the shareholders of LAN or TAM.

At Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings held on December 21, 2011, the shareholders of Holdco II and Sister Holdco approved the merger of Holdco II and Sister Holdco, respectively, with LAN. No further shareholder approvals are required. As a result, this condition has been satisfied.

The holders of not more than 2.5% of the outstanding shares of LAN have excercised their appraisal rights (derecho de retiro) under Chilean law in connection with the approval of the mergers.

On January 23, 2012, the Company announced that shareholders representing 7,237 LAN common shares exercised their appraisal rights as a result of the agreements reached at the December 21, 2011 Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting. As of February 29, 2012, this represented only 0.00212% of LAN shareholders. As a result, this condition has been satisfied.

Entry into the shareholders agreements described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Shareholders Agreements” by TAM, the TAM controlling shareholders, and the LAN controlling shareholders

On January 25, 2012, TAM, the TAM controlling shareholders, the LAN controlling shareholders and Holdco I, as applicable, entered into the shareholders agreements. As a result, this condition has been satisfied.

TAM Controlling Shareholders Conditions for the Commencement of the Exchange Offer

The transaction agreements contain conditions for the commencement of the exchange offer in favor of TAM controlling shareholders. Consequently, Holdco II is not permitted to commence the exchange offer unless all of the following conditions are satisfied by LAN or waived by TAM controlling shareholders as of the date of commencement of the exchange offer:

accuracy in all material respects of the representations and warranties of LAN and the LAN controlling shareholders in the transaction agreements when made and as of the commencement date.

performance in all material respects by LAN and the LAN controlling shareholders of all of their covenants in the transaction agreements required to be performed prior to the commencement date.

absence of a LAN material adverse effect (as defined under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—LAN Representation and Warranties” since December 31, 2009.

absence of specified market disruptions since the date of the transaction agreements.

entry into the shareholders agreements described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Shareholders Agreements” by LAN and LAN controlling shareholders and the LAN controlling shareholders

On January 25, 2012, TAM, the TAM controlling shareholders, the LAN controlling shareholders and Holdco I, as applicable, entered into the shareholders agreements. As a result, this condition has been satisfied.

satisfaction of all the conditions to the obligations of the TAM controlling shareholders to subscribe for shares of Holdco I and Sister Holdco in exchange for their TAM shares described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Conditions to the Subscriptions”.

Conditions to Completion of the Exchange Offer

The only conditions to the completion of the exchange offer are the exchange offer conditions set forth below:

Mutual Conditions to the Completion of the Exchange Offer

Holdco II is not permitted to complete the exchange offer unless all of the following conditions are satisfied or waived by LAN (in the case of LAN’s conditions) or both LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders (in the case of the mutual conditions):

since the commencement date, none of the required listings have been revoked and the required listings shall become effective no later than the effective time;

the number of qualifying minority shares that are held by “agreeing shareholders” must be more than 66 2/3% of the total number of qualifying minority shares that are held by agreeing shareholders and disagreeing shareholders (this is the minimum threshold required to cause to the deregistration of TAM as a public company in Brazil with CVM and the delisting of the shares of TAM from Bovespa);

A holder will be deemed to be an “agreeing shareholder” with respect to its qualifying minority shares only if such holder:

validly tenders such qualifying minority shares into the exchange offer through the US exchange agent and does not withdraw such shares from the exchange offer; or

qualifies such qualifying minority shares for participation in the Auction and:

tenders such shares into, and does not withdraw them from, the Auction; and/or

indicates on the qualification form (a copy of which will be included with the letter of transmittal) that it agrees with the deregistration of TAM as a public company in Brazil with CVM.

A holder will be deemed to be an “disagreeing shareholder” with respect to its qualifying minority shares only if such holder:

validly tenders such qualifying minority shares into the exchange offer through the US exchange agent and subsequently withdraws such shares from the exchange offer; or

qualifies such qualifying minority shares for participation in the Auction and:

does not tender such shares in the Auction; and/or

indicates on the qualification form (a copy of which will be included with the letter of transmittal) that it disagrees with the deregistration of TAM as a public company in Brazil with CVM.

For purposes of the delisting condition, “qualifying minority shares” mean all outstanding TAM shares not represented by TAM ADSs and all outstanding TAM ADSs, in each case that are not owned by TAM, the TAM controlling shareholders, any of their related persons (“pessoas vinculadas”) or any director or executive officer of TAM.

The delisting condition is not waivable under Brazilian law, so if the delisting condition is not satisfied, the exchange offer will terminate and the mergers will not be completed.

The absence of certain actions, events or circumstances that, individually or in the aggregate, have had an adverse effect on the businesses, revenues, operations or financial condition of TAM and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in all material respects.

since the commencement date, no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Form F-4 has been issued by the SEC and no proceeding for that purpose has been initiated or threatened by the SEC.

since the commencement date, there has not been an appraisal event, the holders of the qualifying minority shares shall not have requested a new appraisal report and a new Appraiser in accordance with Brazilian law and the holders of the qualifying minority shares shall no longer have the right to select a new Appraiser and to cause the Appraisal Report to be replaced with a new appraisal report.

The period during which the holders of qualifying minority shares had the right to request a new appraisal report and a new appraiser under Brazilian law has expired, so the holders of qualifying minority shares no longer have the right to exercise these rights.

LAN Conditions to the Completion of the Exchange Offer

Holdco II is not obligated to, and will not, purchase or pay for any of the TAM shares or TAM ADSs validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the exchange offer unless all of such conditions are satisfied or waived by LAN:

since the commencement date, none of the required approvals shall have been revoked or amended, modified or supplemented in any way that could reasonably be expected to materially impede or interfere with, delay, postpone or materially and adversely affect the completion of the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements;

the sum of (i) the number of TAM shares and TAM ADSs validly tendered into, and not withdrawn from, the exchange offer and (ii) the number of TAM shares beneficially owned by the TAM controlling shareholders (which represented approximately 46.63% of the outstanding TAM shares as of March 28, 2012) represents more than 95% of the total number of outstanding TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) and the TAM controlling shareholders shall have stated in writing to LAN that all of the subscription conditions (as defined under —Conditions to the Subscriptions below), have been satisfied or waived;

since the commencement date, no court or other governmental entity of competent jurisdiction shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any restraining order;

no adverse action commenced since the commencement date shall remain pending;

none of the TAM adverse events has occurred since the commencement date which, individually or in the aggregate, has had a material adverse effect on the business, revenues, operations or financial condition of TAM and its subsidiaries in any respect;

since the commencement date, no default in the performance or breach, or any event that with notice, lapse of time or both would result in such a default or breach, by any TAM Company under any of their relevant agreements has occurred that continues to exist, in each case after giving effect to any waivers granted by any other party to such contract and regardless of whether or not any event of default, acceleration or other enforcement action shall have been declared or taken by any such other party;

since the commencement date, no market disruption that could reasonably be expected to have a TAM material adverse effect has occurred; and

the subscriptions have been fully paid, in each case in accordance with the exchange offer agreement.

Conditions to the Subscriptions

The obligations of the TAM controlling shareholders to make and pay the TEP Chile subscription and for TEP Chile to pay the Holdco subscriptions are subject to the following conditions (the “subscription conditions”):

since the commencement date, none of the required approvals have been revoked or amended, modified or supplemented in any way that could reasonably be expected to materially impede or interfere with, delay, postpone or materially and adversely affect the completion of the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements;

since the commencement date, no court or other governmental entity of competent jurisdiction shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any restraining order;

no adverse action commenced since the commencement date shall remain pending;

none of the following actions, events or circumstances has occurred with respect to LAN and its subsidiaries since the commencement date (or prior to that date if no executive officer of TAM had actual knowledge of such event as of the commencement date) that, individually or in the aggregate, have had an adverse effect on the businesses, revenues, operations or financial condition of LAN and its subsidiaries, in any material respect: (a) changes or termination of licenses used to conduct cargo or passenger transport services or threats of any such change or termination; (b) any loss of 10% or more of the total takeoff and landing scheduled operations of LAN and its subsidiaries at certain specified airports; (c) any loss of 15% or more of the permits or air traffic rights that are required to operate in the United States; (d) termination or expiration of any aeronautical insurance policy covering LAN and its subsidiaries unless replaced by a substantially equivalent policy within 24 hours; (e) initiations of inquiries or investigations of LAN and its subsidiaries by an airline regulatory entity relating to safety issues that could be expected to result in the revocation of any license or to be detrimental to LAN’s public image; (f) any event that prevents LAN and its subsidiaries from operating at a certain level out of certain airports; (g) the inability of Chile or Peru to safely control its airspace which prevents normal operations of LAN and its subsidiaries for any certain period of time; (h) aircraft accidents that result in loss of life or total loss of aircraft; (i) issuances of laws or orders that fix or regulate international passenger airline fares affecting 15% or more of the revenues of the international operations of LAN and its subsidiaries, impair the completion of the exchange offer or the mergers or the ability of the parties to exercise their rights and receive the benefits of their interests in Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries, provide for the expropriation or confiscation of LAN assets, or limit the ability to dispose of assets, suspend or limit foreign currency transactions or transfer of funds in and out of Chile, and change the current regulations applicable to capital markets in Brazil or Chile or an increase in taxes or tax rates that adversely impacts the shareholders of TAM who enter into the exchange offer; (j) any natural disaster or similar event that causes damage to infrastructure or airspace used by or any industry affecting LAN and its subsidiaries or any assets of LAN and its subsidiaries used in the ordinary course; and (k) any other event that prevents LAN and its subsidiaries from operating at least 50% of their regular flights during a 30-day period;

since the commencement date, no default in the performance or breach, or any event that with notice, lapse of time or both would result in such a default or breach, by LAN or any of its subsidiaries of any covenant

or agreement contained in any contract to which any of them is a party under which the aggregate consideration provided or received, or to be provided or received, is greater than US$10 million has occurred that continues to exist, in each case after giving effect to any waivers granted by any other party to such contract and regardless of whether or not any event of default, acceleration or other enforcement action shall have been declared or taken by any such other party; and

since the commencement date, no market disruption that could reasonably be expected to have a LAN material adverse effect has occurred.

Pre-Commencement Closing; Commencement of the Exchange Offer

The parties will attend a meeting (the “pre-commencement closing”) on the first business day (“pre-commencement closing date”) following the first day on which all of the commencement conditions are satisfied or waived in accordance with the exchange offer agreement (other than any such conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the pre-commencement closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions) (the “condition date”). Holdco II is required to commence the exchange offer as promptly as practicable on the first business day after the pre-commencement closing date by publishing the Edital relating to the exchange offer (the “Edital”) in Brazil in accordance with Brazilian law. We refer to the date and time at which such publication occurs as the “commencement date.”

Actions on the Auction Date; Completion of the Exchange Offer

The Auction will be held on the Bovespa in Brazil in which the holders of TAM shares who decide to tender into the exchange offer will tender their TAM shares and receive such LAN common shares in the form of LAN BDSs (each of which represents one LAN common share), which will be evidenced by LAN BDRs.

The exchange offer and withdrawal rights for tenders of TAM ADSs and TAM shares will expire at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time (6:00 p.m. São Paulo time) (the “expiration time”) on the date (the “expiration date”) immediately preceding the date on which the auction on Bovespa will occur (the “Auction date”).

The transaction agreements describe the schedule of events to occur after the expiration time on the expiration date as follows:

no later than the Tender Certification Time (which is 6:00 a.m. Eastern time (8:00 a.m. São Paulo time)) on the Auction date, Itaú will certify to Bovespa, Holdco II, LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders the total number of TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) that the US exchange agent has certified to Itaú have been validly tendered into the exchange offer through the US exchange agent and not withdrawn from the exchange offer as of the expiration time;

at 8:00 a.m. Eastern time (9:00 a.m. São Paulo time) on the Auction date, Bovespa will inform LAN, Holdco II and the TAM controlling shareholders whether or not the minimum conditions (taking into account the TAM shares and TAM ADSs tendered through the US exchange agent) have been satisfied;

promptly after receiving that notice (but no later than 8:10 a.m. Eastern time (9:10 a.m. São Paulo time) on the Auction date), LAN will notify the TAM controlling shareholders in writing as to whether or not all of the exchange offer conditions waivable by LAN (other than the condition relating to the TEP Chile subscription and the Holdco subscriptions) have been satisfied or irrevocably waived by LAN;

if the LAN condition notice states that all exchange offer conditions have been satisfied or waived, then promptly after receiving LAN’s notice (but no later than 8:20 a.m. Eastern time (9:20 a.m. São Paulo time) on the Auction date), the TAM controlling shareholders will inform LAN in writing whether or not all of the exchange offer conditions waivable by them and the subscription conditions have been satisfied or irrevocably waived by them, and if all such conditions have been satisfied or waived by them, then promptly after sending that notice (but no later than 8:30 a.m. Eastern time (9:30 a.m. São Paulo time) on the Auction date), the TAM controlling shareholders will subscribe and pay for a number of shares of TEP

Chile, which, when added to the shares of TEP Chile held by the controlling shareholders of TAM at that time, would equal 100% of the shares of TEP Chile in exchange for all of the TAM common shares and TAM preferred shares held by them (which we refer to as the “TEP Chile subscription”). The transaction agreements require that, as a result of the TEP Chile subscription, each of the TAM controlling shareholders will have the same ownership in TEP Chile as he or she had in TEP;

before the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, TEP Chile subscribed for non-voting shares of Holdco I in exchange for all of the TAM common shares to be contributed by the TAM controlling shareholders to TEP Chile and subscribed for Sister Holdco shares in exchange for all of the non-voting shares of Holdco I, 6.2% of the voting shares of Holdco I and all of the TAM preferred shares to be contributed by the TAM controlling shareholders to TEP Chile. Immediately after subscription and payment of the TEP Chile subscription, TEP Chile will pay for these subscriptions by paying Holdco I with all of the TAM common shares contributed to it by the TAM controlling shareholders and pay Sister Holdco with all of the non-voting shares of Holdco I, 6.2% of the voting shares of Holdco I and all of the TAM preferred shares contributed to it by the TAM controlling shareholders (which we refer to as the “Holdco subscriptions” and the “Sister Holdco Subscriptions,” respectively, and which we refer to collectively with the TEP Chile subscriptions as the “subscriptions”);

promptly after payment of the subscriptions (but no later than 8:40 a.m. Eastern time (9:40 a.m. São Paulo time) on the Auction date), LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders will issue a press release announcing that all of the exchange offer conditions have been satisfied or irrevocably waived; and

if all the exchange offer conditions are so satisfied or waived, the auction (which we refer to as the “Auction”) will commence at the Auction time, which is 9:00 a.m. Eastern time (10:00 a.m. São Paulo time) (or such other time as Bovespa may determine) on the Auction date, and the TAM controlling shareholders will cause Holdco II to complete the exchange offer on the Auction date by accepting for exchange and exchanging (with LAN ADSs and LAN BDSs issuable in the mergers) all TAM shares validly tendered into, and not withdrawn from, the exchange offer through the Auction and all TAM shares and TAM ADSs validly tendered, and not withdrawn from, the exchange offer through the US exchange agent that Holdco II is obligated to acquire for exchange pursuant to the terms of the exchange offer. The completion of the exchange offer will be deemed to be the acquisitions of TAM shares tendered pursuant to the Auction and the acquisitions of TAM shares and TAM ADSs tendered through the US exchange agent, and such purchases will be settled on the third business day following the Auction date in accordance with the applicable procedures of Bovespa and the SEC.

However, if (x) either LAN or the TAM controlling shareholders do not state that all of the conditions described above have been satisfied or irrevocably waived or (y) the subscriptions or any of the payments required pursuant to the subscriptions are not made in full when required by the transaction agreements, then the Auction will not occur and the exchange offer will expire without the purchase of any TAM shares or TAM ADSs.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Auction commences at any time other than 9:00 a.m. Eastern time (10:00 a.m. São Paulo time) on the Auction date, then each of the times specified above (except for the last time that a withdrawal may be made) will be adjusted by the same amount that the actual time of the commencement of the Auction differs from 9:00 a.m. Eastern time (10:00 a.m. São Paulo time).

Extensions and Amendments

The exchange offer will initially expire on the date provided in the Edital. However, if all of the exchange offer conditions are not satisfied at, or waived by the parties prior to, the scheduled expiration time for the exchange offer, then LAN or the TAM controlling shareholders (if they are entitled to the benefit of the unsatisfied condition) may cause Holdco II to request permission from the CVM to extend the expiration time for the exchange offer in maximum increments of three days to no later than 28 days after the commencement date. If both LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders agree to request a modification to the terms and conditions of the exchange offer or revocation of the exchange offer, the TAM controlling shareholders are required to cause Holdco II to request permission from the CVM to modify the terms and conditions of the exchange offer or to revoke the exchange offer. LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders have agreed to cause Holdco II to request permission from the CVM to revoke the exchange offer if the transaction agreements terminate in accordance with their terms.

Delistings

Each of the TAM controlling shareholders and TAM are required to use its or their commercially reasonable efforts to cause (i) the TAM shares to be delisted from Bovespa if the delisting condition is satisfied with respect to either class of TAM stock and (ii) the TAM ADSs to be delisted from the NYSE as soon as practicable after the effective time.

Completion Board Meeting

LAN is required to convene a special meeting of the LAN board of directors prior to the settlement of the acquisitions to be made pursuant to the exchange offer to give effect to the delivery of the required LAN common shares issuable pursuant to the mergers as soon as practicable, but not later than two business days following, the completion of the exchange offer.

The Mergers; Directors and Officers; By-laws

Holdco II Merger

The implementation agreement provides for the merger of Holdco II with and into LAN after the completion of the exchange offer and prior to the settlement of the purchases made pursuant to the exchange offer. As the surviving corporation, we will continue to exist following the Holdco II merger. Pursuant to the Holdco II merger, each share of Holdco II stock (including those issuable pursuant to the settlement of the purchases made pursuant to the Auction) will be converted into a LAN common share at a ratio of 0.9 of a LAN common share per share of Holdco II stock (the “Holdco II exchange ratio”). Holders of TAM preferred shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs) will receive, by virtue of the Holdco II merger, LAN common shares in the following form in exchange for their TAM shares or TAM ADSs tendered and accepted for exchange in the exchange offer, depending on the form of TAM preferred shares tendered in the exchange offer:

holders of TAM ADSs that are tendered and accepted for exchange in the exchange offer will receive LAN ADRs issued pursuant to the deposit agreement, dated as of October 28, 2011, among LAN, the LAN depositary, and the record holders and beneficial owners of LAN ADRs from time to time;

holders of TAM shares registered under Resolution No. 2,689/00 of January 26, 2000 enacted by the CMN that are tendered and accepted for exchange in the exchange offer will receive LAN common shares in the form of LAN BDRs or LAN ADRs, as permitted by applicable law; and

holders of all other TAM shares tendered and accepted for exchange in the exchange offer will receive LAN common shares in the form of BDRs representing such shares to be issued pursuant to a deposit agreement in customary form among LAN, a depositary agent to be selected by LAN and reasonably acceptable to TAM and the holders of LAN BDRs from time to time.

We are required to pay or cause to be paid all deposit fees and other expenses payable in connection with the issuance of such LAN ADRs and LAN BDRs.

Immediately after the completion of the Holdco II merger, we will contribute any TAM common shares beneficially owned by Holdco II immediately prior to such merger to Holdco I in exchange for new non-voting shares of Holdco I on a one-for-one basis. After this contribution, we will increase our ownership percentage of the outstanding voting shares of Holdco I by converting our non-voting shares of Holdco I into voting shares of Holdco I to (A) 100% minus (B) 80% divided by the percentage of the outstanding TAM common shares owned by Holdco I determined on a primary basis after giving effect to such contribution.

Voting shares of Holdco I have the exclusive right to vote on, approve or consent to all matters that are subject to any vote of or approval by the shareholders of Holdco I under the applicable law of Chile or otherwise (other than the limited voting rights of the non-voting shares of Holdco I) and have no economic rights other than the right to receive a nominal dividend (we refer to these rights as the “dividend rights”). Non-voting shares of Holdco I have the exclusive right to receive all dividends, distributions or other amounts payable by Holdco I in respect of any shares of its capital stock other than the dividend rights and have no right to vote on or approve any matter that is subject to any vote of or approval by the shareholders of Holdco I under applicable law of Chile or otherwise other than the rights to vote on and approve the matters requiring the approval of the holders of such shares under the applicable law of Chile or otherwise.

Sister Holdco Mergers

The implementation agreement also provides for the merger of Sister Holdco with and into LAN after the completion of the exchange offer and prior to the settlement of the purchases made pursuant to the exchange offer. As the surviving corporation, LAN will continue to exist following the Sister Holdco merger. We refer to the time that the mergers become effective as the “effective time.”

Pursuant to the Sister Holdco merger, each share of Sister Holdco stock will be converted into 0.90 of a LAN common share at a ratio of 0.9 of a LAN common share per share of Sister Holdco stock (the “Sister Holdco exchange ratio”). We will pay or cause to be paid all deposit fees and other expenses payable in connection with the issuance of such LAN common shares.

By-Laws

The parties are required to take all necessary action so that immediately following the effective time of the mergers the by-laws of Holdco I, Sister Holdco and Holdco II shall be in the forms attached to the exchange offer agreement.

Directors

We and the TAM controlling shareholders are required to discuss in good faith and agree upon the individuals who will be directors of LAN, Holdco I, TAM and their subsidiaries as of the effective time and to take all necessary action to ensure that immediately following, and on the same day as, the effective time of the mergers, the individuals selected for election to the board of directors of LAN, Holdco I, TAM and their subsidiaries by each of us and TEP Chile pursuant to the Holdco I shareholders agreement, by each of us and TEP Chile pursuant to the TAM shareholders agreement and by each of the LAN controlling shareholders and TEP Chile pursuant to the control group shareholders agreement shall be the directors of LAN, Holdco I, TAM and their subsidiaries. For a discussion of the parties rights to elect the directors of LAN, Holdco I, TAM and their subsidiaries, see the “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Shareholders Agreements—Voting Agreements.”

Effects of the Mergers

Capital Increase

When the shareholders of LAN approved the mergers, the share capital of LAN was increased by an aggregate amount equal to the sum of the share capital of Holdco II and the share capital of Sister Holdco at such time which amounts to US$ 1,417.6 million (the “initial capital increase”). After the completion of the mergers, the share capital of LAN will be increased a second time by the amount by which the net asset value of the TAM shares contributed pursuant to the subscriptions exceeds, or will be decreased by the amount by which such net asset value is less than, the initial capital increase (which we refer to as the “second capital increase”). The second capital increase of LAN will not change the number of issued and outstanding LAN common shares (including those represented by LAN ADSs and LAN BDSs).

Treatment of Holdco II and Sister Holdco Stock

At the effective time, each share of Holdco II stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be exchanged for 0.90 of a validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable LAN common share, which is the Holdco II exchange ratio less applicable withholding tax. Each share of Sister Holdco stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be exchanged for 0.90 of a validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable LAN common share, which is the Sister Holdco exchange ratio less applicable withholding tax.

TAM Options

TAM and the TAM board of directors, as applicable, were required prior to the commencement of the exchange offer to adopt any resolutions and take any actions necessary to ensure that (a) from and after the effective time of the mergers each TAM stock option outstanding immediately prior to the effective time, whether vested or unvested, will be exercisable only when vested and only for an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of TAM stock in respect of which such TAM stock option is exercisable, and (ii) the amount (if any) by which (x) the product of the Holdco II exchange ratio and the closing price of the LAN common shares on the SSE on the last business day prior to the date on which such TAM stock option was exercised exceeds (y) the exercise price per share of TAM stock under such TAM stock option, less any applicable taxes required to be withheld with respect to such payment, and (b) none of execution, delivery or performance of the implementation agreement or the completion of the mergers or any other transactions contemplated by implementation agreement will, directly or indirectly, cause or result in any acceleration of the vesting of any TAM stock options, whether prior to, on or after the effective time.

Exchange Fund

Prior to the effective time, we will deposit or cause to be deposited with the US exchange agent, for the benefit of the holders of Holdco II stock and Sister Holdco stock, certificates or, at our option, evidence of shares in book-entry form, representing LAN common shares, including any cash to be paid in lieu of fractional LAN common shares, as discussed below in this section. We refer to such certificates or evidence of book-entry form, as the case may be, for LAN common shares and such cash paid in lieu of fractional shares collectively as the “exchange fund.” Any interest or income produced from investments of the exchange fund by the US exchange agent will not be deemed part of the exchange fund and will be payable to us.

Fractional Shares

No certificates or scrip representing fractional LAN common shares will be issued in the mergers or pursuant to the statutory squeeze-out and such fractional shares will not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any rights of a shareholder of LAN. In lieu of fractional shares, we will pay each holder of a fractional LAN common share an amount in cash in US dollars equal to the product of (a) the fractional LAN common shares to which such holder would otherwise be entitled after taking into account all shares of Holdco II Stock or Sister Holdco stock owned of record by such holder immediately prior to the effective time, and (b) the closing price of the LAN common shares on the SSE on the last trading day immediately preceding the date on which the Auction on Bovespa occurs (the “Auction date”) (as reported inwww.bolsadesantiago.comor, if not reported therein, by another authoritative source), converted into US dollars using the “dólar observado” or “observed” exchange rate applicable on the Auction date as published by theBanco Central de Chile (“Central Bank of Chile”). This exchange rate (the “Chilean observed exchange rate”) is the average exchange rate of the previous business day’s transactions in the Formal Exchange Market (banks and other entities authorized by the Central Bank of Chile) and is published in theDiario Oficial (Official Gazette) by the Central Bank of Chile pursuant to number 6 of Chapter I of its Compendium of Foreign Exchange Rules on the date it applies, and is also made available atwww.bcentral.clat or around 6:00 P.M. (Santiago time) on the preceding day.

Statutory Squeeze-Out

After the completion of the exchange offer, if permitted under applicable Brazilian law, TAM will compulsorily redeem any TAM shares (including those represented as TAM ADSs) that did not accept the exchange offer, other

than those beneficially owned by the TAM controlling shareholders (the “non-tendered shares”). In this redemption, the holders of non-tendered shares will have the right to receive cash in an amount equal to the product of (i) the number of LAN ADSs or LAN BDSs that they would have received pursuant to the exchange offer in respect of its non-tendered shares (assuming they could have received fractional LAN common shares), and (ii) the closing price of the LAN common shares on the SSE on the last trading day immediately preceding the Auction date (as reported on the SSE’s website, www.bolsadesantiago.com or, if unavailable, as reported by another authoritative source), as converted into US dollars using the Chilean observed exchange rate applicable on the Auction date as published by the Central Bank of Chile, duly adjusted by the Central Bank of Brazil’s overnight lending rate. After TAM redeems all remaining TAM shares (including those represented by TAM ADSs), LAN will (i) contribute all voting ordinary shares of TAM acquired in the exchange offer to Holdco I in exchange for non-voting shares of Holdco I, and (ii) increase its ownership percentage of the outstanding voting shares of Holdco I to 20% by converting its non-voting shares of Holdco I into voting shares of Holdco I.

Delistings

Each of the TAM controlling shareholder and TAM are required to use its or their commercially reasonable efforts to cause (i) the TAM preferred shares to be delisted from the Bovespa if the delisting condition is satisfied with respect to such class of TAM stock and (ii) the TAM ADSs to be delisted from the NYSE as soon as practicable after the effective time.

Termination

The transaction agreements will terminate automatically if and when (i) the exchange offer expires in accordance with its terms or is revoked with the permission of CVM without the purchase of any TAM shares or (ii) if the product of 0.90 and the high end of the range of economic value of LAN per LAN common share as determined by the Appraiser at any time is less than the low end of the range of economic value of TAM per TAM share of stock as determined by the Appraiser at such time. In addition, LAN and the TAM controlling shareholders may terminate the transaction agreements by mutual written consent.

The transaction agreements may also be terminated and the exchange offer and the mergers may be abandoned at any time prior to the commencement of the exchange offer as follows, whether before or after receipt of any requisite shareholder approvals:

by either LAN or the TAM controlling shareholders:

if the exchange offer has not commenced by June 30, 2012 (the “outside date”);

if any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction refuses to grant any required approval (other than any approval required from CVM with respect to the inclusion in the Edital of any of the LAN’s conditions to the completion of the exchange offer) and such refusal has become final and nonappealable or any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any restraining order that has become final and non-appealable, and such event would give rise to the failure of the condition relating to receipt of all required approvals or absence of restraining order;

however, none of the termination rights described in the preceding bullet points will be available to any party whose material breach of a representation, warranty or covenant in any transaction agreement has been a principal cause of the failure of the exchange offer to commence by the outside date or the failure of the condition giving rise to such termination right, as applicable.

by LAN:

if TAM, TEP or the TAM controlling shareholders has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in the transaction agreements or any of such representations and warranties becomes untrue as of any date after the signing date, which breach

or failure to perform or untruth (i) would give rise to the failure of the condition relating to accuracy of the representations and warranties of TAM, the TAM controlling shareholder and the Amaro family or compliance by any of them with their obligations under the transaction agreements and (ii) is not capable of being cured or, if capable of being cured, is not cured by TAM, the TAM controlling shareholder or the Amaro family, as applicable, by the earlier of (A) the day before the outside date and (B) the 30th calendar day following receipt of written notice of such breach or failure to perform from LAN;

prior to the commencement of the exchange offer if CVM has refused to grant its approval to the inclusion in the Edital of any of the LAN’s conditions to the completion of the exchange offer; or

if (i) the TAM board of directors or any committee thereof (x) withholds, withdraws or modifies or qualifies in any manner adverse to LAN either of the recommendations of the board of directors of TAM in support of the proposed combination, (y) approves, adopts, or recommends any alternative proposal, or (z) makes, causes to be made or resolves to make or cause to be made any public statement proposing or announcing an intention to take any of the preceding actions (which we refer to as a “TAM board recommendation change”); or (iii) in any such case all of the directors designated for election to the TAM board of directors by the TAM controlling shareholder and/or the Amaro family do not vote against the TAM board recommendation change;

by the TAM controlling shareholders:

if LAN or the LAN controlling shareholders has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in the transaction agreements or any of such representations and warranties becomes untrue as of any date after the signing date, which breach or failure to perform or untruth (i) would give rise to the failure of the condition relating to accuracy of the representations and warranties of LAN and the LAN controlling shareholders or compliance by any of them with their obligations under the transaction agreements and (ii) is not capable of being cured or, if capable of being cured, is not cured by LAN or the LAN controlling shareholders, as applicable, by the earlier of (A) the day before the outside date and (B) the 30th calendar day following receipt of written notice of such breach or failure to perform from TAM; or

if (i) the LAN board of directors or any committee thereof (x) withholds, withdraws or modifies or qualifies in any manner adverse to TAM either of the LAN board recommendations in support of the proposed combination, (y) approves, adopts, or recommends any alternative proposal, or (z) makes, causes to be made or resolves to make or cause to be made any public statement proposing or announcing an intention to take any of the preceding actions (which we refer to collectively as, a “LAN board recommendation change”) or (iii) in either such case all of the directors designated for election to the LAN board of directors by the LAN controlling shareholders did not vote against the LAN board recommendation change.

Termination Fees

TAM is required to pay us a fee equal to US$200 million (“TAM termination fee”) and reimburse LAN for all documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it or any of its subsidiaries in connection with the transaction agreements and the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements up to a maximum amount of $25 million (no later than the second business day after TAM receives documentation for reimbursement) if:

LAN terminates the transaction agreements because the board of directors of TAM or any committee thereof (x) withholds, withdraws or modifies or qualifies in any manner adverse to LAN either of the recommendations of the board of directors of TAM in support of the proposed combination, (y) approves, adopts, or recommends any alternative proposal, or (z) makes, causes to be made or resolves to make or cause to be made any public statement proposing or announcing an intention to take any of the foregoing actions; or within 12 months after the date that a competing proposal termination occurs, TAM or any of its subsidiaries completes any transaction that constitutes a competing proposal with the person that made the

competing proposal or any of its affiliates, enters into any binding or non-binding agreement with such person or any of its affiliates providing for a transaction that constitutes a competing proposal or the board of directors of TAM approves or recommends to its shareholders or does not oppose any competing proposal made by such person or any of its affiliates (in each case regardless of whether such competing proposal was made or announced or became publicly known before or after termination of the transaction agreements and in any such case the TAM termination fee is payable on the date that is the first to occur of the event(s) referred to in this paragraph).

A “competing proposal termination” occurs if:

(A)any person makes an alternative proposal with respect to TAM or LAN, or a “competing proposal,” to any party or its representatives,

(B)a competing proposal by any person becomes publicly known, or

(C)any person publicly announces an intention (whether or not conditional) to make a competing proposal; and

In each case, the transaction agreements automatically terminate solely because either of the minimum conditions is not satisfied or because an appraisal event occurs.

We are required to pay TAM a fee equal to $200 million (“LAN termination fee”) and reimburse TAM for all documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it or any of its subsidiaries in connection with the transaction agreements and the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements up to a maximum amount of $25 million (no later than the second business day after we receive documentation for reimbursement) if:

the TAM controlling shareholders terminate the transaction agreements because the board of directors of LAN or any committee thereof (x) withholds, withdraws or modifies or qualifies in any manner adverse to TAM either of the recommendations of the board of directors of LAN in support of the proposed combination, (y) approves, adopts, or recommends any alternative proposal, or (z) makes, causes to be made or resolves to make or cause to be made any public statement proposing or announcing an intention to take any of the foregoing actions; or within 12 months after the date that a competing proposal termination occurs, LAN or any of its subsidiaries complete any transaction that constitutes a competing proposal with the person that made the competing proposal or any of its affiliates, enter into any binding or non-binding agreement with such person or any of its affiliates providing for a transaction that constitutes a competing proposal or LAN’s board of directors approves or recommends to its shareholders or does not oppose any competing proposal made by such person or any of its affiliates (in each case regardless of whether such competing proposal was made or announced or became publicly known before or after termination of the transaction agreements and in any such case the LAN termination fee is payable on the date that is the first to occur of the event(s) referred to in this paragraph).

Remedies

If either we or TAM fails promptly to pay the amount due to the other party as a result of the termination of the transaction agreements under certain circumstances and, in order to obtain such payment, the other party commences a suit that results in a judgment against us or TAM for all or a portion of the TAM termination fee or the LAN termination fee, as applicable, such party is required to pay to the other party its costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) in connection with such suit, together with interest on the amount of the TAM termination fee or the LAN termination fee, as applicable, accruing from the date such payment was required to be made pursuant to the implementation agreement until the date of payment at the six-month LIBOR rate in effect on the date such payment was required to be made plus 3%. The right to receive the fees and expenses payable described above under “—Termination Fees” will be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies a party may have at law or in equity with respect to breaches of the implementation agreement by the other party.

Indemnification

Indemnification by LAN

We are required to indemnify, defend and hold the TAM controlling shareholders, its affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees and shareholders harmless from and against any and all damages, losses, charges, liabilities, claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, payments, judgments, settlements, assessments, deficiencies, taxes, interest, penalties, and costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursement), which we refer to collectively as “indemnifiable losses,” incurred by any of them (whether or not involving a claim by any third party) arising out of or resulting from (i) the failure of the exchange offer to be completed solely as a result of any failure by LAN to confirm in writing to the controlling shareholders of TAM on the expiration date that any exchange offer condition waivable only by LAN (other than the squeeze-out condition) was satisfied if (but only if) such condition was in fact satisfied or (ii) any failure of the exchange offer to be completed after the controlling shareholders of TAM has paid for the TEP Chile subscription.

Indemnification by the TAM Controlling Shareholders

The controlling shareholders of TAM, jointly and severally, are required to indemnify, defend and hold us, our affiliates and our respective directors, officers, employees and shareholders harmless from and against any and all indemnifiable losses incurred by any of us (whether or not involving a claim by a third party) arising out of or resulting from any failure by the controlling shareholders of TAM to confirm in writing to us on the expiration date that any of the subscription conditions was satisfied if (but only if) such condition was in fact satisfied.

Access

Subject to certain exceptions, both we and TAM will, upon reasonable prior written notice, afford the other and its authorized representatives reasonable access to it and furnish the other information concerning its business, properties and personnel as may reasonably be requested until the completion of the exchange offer or termination of the transaction agreements, whichever occurs sooner.

Amendment

The parties are not permitted to amend transaction agreements after the commencement of the exchange offer.

Expenses

Except for the termination fees described above, each party is required to pay its own fees and expenses that it incurs in connection with the transaction agreements, the mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the transaction agreements, regardless of whether the exchange offer is commenced or the exchange offer and the mergers are completed, except that expenses incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of the exchange offer prospectus and the filing fee for the Form F-4 will be shared equally by LAN, on the one hand, and TAM controlling shareholders, on the other hand.

Choice of Law and Jurisdiction

The transaction agreements are governed by New York law with regard to all matters other than the authorization and execution of the transaction agreements, which are governed by the laws of each party’s jurisdiction of incorporation.

Shareholders Agreements

As discussed above under the section “—The Transaction Agreements”, following the combination of LAN and TAM, TAM will continue to exist as a subsidiary of Holdco I (and as an affiliate of LAN) and our name will be changed to “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” or “LATAM.” On January 25, 2012 we and the LAN controlling shareholders entered into several shareholders agreements with TAM, Holdco I and TEP Chile to set forth our

agreement with respect to the governance, management and operation of LAN, Holdco I, TAM and their respective subsidiaries (collectively, the “LATAM Group.”) following the effective time. The shareholders agreements set forth an extensive set of principles that will apply to the corporate governance and organization of the LATAM Group following the effective time, which are summarized below. Pursuant to their terms, the shareholders agreements will become effective only if and at the time that Holdco I becomes a holder of at least 80% of the outstanding TAM common shares.

Governance and Management of LATAM Group

The control group shareholders agreement and the LAN-TEP shareholders agreement set forth the parties’ agreement on the governance and management of the LATAM Group following the effective time. We refer to the shareholders agreement among the LAN controlling shareholders and TEP Chile, which sets forth the parties’ agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of the LATAM Group, and voting and transfer of their respective LAN common shares and TEP Chile’s voting shares of Holdco I, following the effective time as the “control group shareholders agreement.” We refer to the shareholders agreement between us and TEP Chile, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of the LATAM Group following the effective time as the “LAN-TEP shareholders agreement.”

This section describes the key provisions of the control group shareholders agreement and the LAN-TEP shareholders agreement. The rights and obligations of the parties to the control group shareholders agreement and the LAN-TEP shareholders agreement are governed by the express terms and conditions of the aforementioned shareholders agreements and not by this summary or any other information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F. The description of these control group shareholders agreement and the LAN-TEP shareholders agreement summarized below and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the aforementioned shareholders agreements, which are incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F. For a full understanding of these agreements, we advise you to read these agreements carefully and in their entirety.

Composition of the LATAM Board

LAN expects that Mr. Maurício Rolim Amaro and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro will be elected to the LATAM board of directors at a special meeting of the shareholders of LATAM to be held after the effective time in which the entire LATAM board of directors will be replaced. Mr. Maurício Rolim Amaro will be the chairman of LATAM’s board of directors for the first two years following the effective time. If Mr. Amaro vacates this position for any reason within that two-year period, TEP Chile has the right to select a replacement to complete his term. Thereafter, LATAM’s board of directors will appoint any of its members as the chairman of LATAM’s board of directors, from time to time, in accordance with LATAM’s by-laws.

LATAM Board Committees

Promptly after the effective time, our board of directors will establish four committees to review, discuss and make recommendations to our board of directors. These include a Strategy Committee, a Leadership Committee, a Finance Committee and a Brand, Product and Frequent Flyer Program Committee. The Strategy Committee will focus on the corporate strategy, current strategic issues and the three-year plans and budgets for the main business units and functional areas and high-level competitive strategy reviews. The Leadership Committee will focus on, among other things, group culture, high-level organizational structure, appointment of the chief executive officer (Vice Presidente Ejecutivo), LATAM CEO of the LATAM Group (“LATAM CEO”) and his or her other reports, corporate compensation philosophy, compensation structures and levels for the LATAM CEO and other key executives, succession or contingency planning for the LATAM CEO and performance assessment of the LATAM CEO. The Finance Committee will be responsible for financial policies and strategy, capital structure, monitoring policy compliance, tax optimization strategy and the quality and reliability of financial information. Finally, the Brand and Frequent Flyer Program Committee will be responsible for brand strategies and brand building initiatives for the corporate and main business unit brands, the main characteristics of products and services for each of the main business units, frequent flyer program strategy and key program features and regular audit of brand performance.

Management of the LATAM Group

Enrique Cueto Plaza, currently our CEO, will be the LATAM CEO following the effective time. The LATAM CEO will be the highest ranked officer of the LATAM Group and will report directly to the LATAM board of directors. The LATAM CEO will be charged with the general supervision, direction and control of the business of the LATAM Group and certain other responsibilities set forth in the LAN-TEP shareholders agreement. After any departure of the LATAM CEO, our board of directors will select his or her successor after receiving the recommendation of the Leadership Committee.

Ignacio Cueto Plaza, currently our president and chief operating officer (Gerente General), or the “COO”, will be the COO of LATAM, or the “LATAM COO,” following the effective time. The LATAM COO will report directly to the LATAM CEO and will have general supervision, direction and control of the passenger and cargo operations of the LATAM Group, excluding those conducted by Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries, and the international passenger business of the LATAM Group. The LATAM COO, together with the TAM Group CEO, will recommend a candidate to the LATAM CEO to serve as the head of the international passenger business of the LATAM Group (including both long haul and regional operations), who shall report jointly to the LATAM COO and the TAM Group CEO. The key executives of the LATAM Group (other than the LATAM CEO and those in the TAM Group) will be appointed by, and will report, directly or indirectly, to the LATAM CEO.

The head office of the LATAM Group will continue to be located in Santiago, Chile following the effective time.

Governance and Management of Holdco I and TAM

The Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement set forth the parties’ agreement on the governance and management of Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “TAM Group”) following the effective time. We refer to the shareholders agreement between us, Holdco I and TEP Chile, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of Holdco I, and voting and transfer of voting shares of Holdco I, following the effective time as the “Holdco I shareholders agreement” and to the shareholders agreement between us, Holdco I, TAM and TEP Chile, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of TAM and its subsidiaries following the effective time as the “TAM shareholders agreement.”

This section describes the key provisions of the Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement. The rights and obligations of the parties to the Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement are governed by the express terms and conditions of the aforementioned shareholders agreements and not by this summary or any other information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F. The description of these Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement summarized below and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the aforementioned shareholders agreements, which are incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F. For a full understanding of these agreements, we advise you to read these agreements carefully and in their entirety.

Composition of the Holdco I and TAM Boards

The Holdco I shareholders agreement and TAM shareholders agreement generally provide for identical boards of directors and the same chief executive officer at Holdco I and TAM, with us appointing two directors and TEP Chile appointing four directors (including the chairman of the board of directors). For the first two years after the effective time, the chairman of the Holdco I and TAM boards of directors will be Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro.

The control group shareholders agreement provides that the persons elected by or on behalf of the LAN controlling shareholders or the controlling shareholder of TAM to our board of directors must also serve on the boards of directors of both Holdco I and TAM.

Management of Holdco I and TAM

The day-to-day business and affairs of Holdco I will be managed by the TAM Group CEO under the oversight of the board of directors of Holdco I. The day-to-day business and affairs of TAM will be managed by theTAM Diretoria under the oversight of the board of directors of TAM. The “TAM Diretoria” will be comprised of the TAM Group CEO, the TAM CFO, the TAM COO and the TAM CCO. Marco Bologna, currently the CEO of TAM, will be the initial CEO of Holdco I and TAM, or the “TAM Group CEO” and any successor CEO will be selected by us from three candidates proposed by TEP Chile. The TAM Group CEO will have general supervision, direction and control of the business and operations of the TAM Group (other than the international passenger business of the LATAM Group) and will carry out all orders and resolutions of the board of directors of TAM. The initial chief financial officer of TAM, or the “TAM CFO,” will be jointly selected by us and TEP Chile and any successor CFO will be selected by TEP Chile from three candidates proposed by us. The chief operating officer of TAM, or the “TAM COO,” and chief commercial officer of TAM, or the “TAM CCO,” will be jointly selected and recommended to the TAM board of directors by the TAM Group CEO and TAM CFO and approved by the TAM board of directors. These shareholders agreements also regulate the composition of the boards of directors of subsidiaries of TAM.

TAM will continue to be headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil following the effective time of the mergers.

Supermajority Actions

Certain actions by Holdco I or TAM require supermajority approval by the board of directors or the shareholders of Holdco I or TAM which effectively require the approval of both us and TEP Chile before the specified actions can be taken. Actions that require supermajority approval of the Holdco I board of directors or the TAM board of directors include, as applicable:

to approve the annual budget and business plan and the multi-year business (which we refer to collectively as the “approved plans”), as well as any amendments to these plans;

to take or agree to take any action which causes, or will reasonably cause, individually, or in the aggregate, any capital, operating or other expense of any TAM Company and its subsidiaries to be greater than (i) the lesser of 1% of revenue or 10% of profit under the approved plans, with respect to actions affecting the profit and loss statement, or (ii) the lesser of 2% of assets or 10% of cash and cash equivalents (as defined by IFRS) as set forth in the approved plan then in effect , with respect to actions affecting the cash flow statement;

to create, dispose of or admit new shareholders to any subsidiary of the relevant company, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to approve the acquisition, disposal, modification or encumbrance by any TAM company of any asset greater than $15 million or of any equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities of any TAM Company or other company, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to approve any investment in assets not related to the corporate purpose of any TAM Company, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to enter into any agreement in an amount greater than $15 million, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to enter into any agreement related to profit sharing, joint ventures, business collaborations, alliance memberships, code sharing arrangements, except as approved by the business plans and budget then in effect, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to terminate, modify or waive any rights or claims of a relevant company or its subsidiaries under any arrangement in any amount greater than $15 million, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to commence, participate in, compromise or settle any material action with respect to any litigation or proceeding in an amount greater than $15 million, relating to the relevant company, except to the extent expressly permitted in the approved plans;

to approve the execution, amendment, termination or ratification of agreements with related parties, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to approve any financial statements, amendments, or to any accounting, dividend or tax policy of the relevant company;

to approve the grant of any security interest or guarantee to secure obligations of third parties;

to appoint executives other than the Holdco I CEO or the TAM Diretoria or to re-elect the then current TAM CEO or TAM CFO; and

to approve any vote to be cast by the relevant company or its subsidiaries in its capacity as a shareholder.

Actions requiring supermajority shareholder approval include:

to approve any amendments to the by-laws of any relevant company or its subsidiaries in respect to the following matters: (i) corporate purpose, (ii) corporate capital; (iii) the rights inherent to each class of shares and its shareholders; (iv) the attributions of shareholder regular meetings or limitations to attributions of the board of directors; (v) changes in the number of directors or officers; (vi) the term; (vii) the change in the corporate headquarters of a relevant company; (viii) the composition, attributions and liabilities of management of any relevant company; and (ix) dividends and other distributions;

to approve the dissolution, liquidation, winding up of a relevant company;

to approve the transformation, merger, spin-up or any kind of corporate re-organization of a relevant company;

to pay or distribute dividends or any other kind of distribution to the shareholders;

to approve the issuance, redemption or amortization of any debt securities, equity securities or convertible securities;

to approve a plan or the disposal by sale, encumbrance or otherwise of 50% or more of the assets, as determined by the balance sheet of the previous year, of Holdco I;

to approve the disposal by sale, encumbrance of otherwise of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary of Holdco I representing at least 20% of Holdco I or to approve the sale, encumbrance or disposition of equity securities such that Holdco I loses control;

to approve the grant of any security interest or guarantee to secure obligations in excess of 50% of the assets of the relevant company; and

to approve the execution, amendment, termination or ratification of acts or agreement with related parties but only if applicable law requires approval of such matters.

Voting Agreements, Transfers and Other Arrangements

Voting Agreements

The LAN controlling shareholders and TEP Chile have agreed in the control group shareholders agreement to vote their respective LAN common shares as follows after the effective time:

until such time as TEP Chile sells any of its LAN common shares (other than the exempted shares as defined below held by TEP Chile), the LAN controlling shareholders will vote their LAN common shares to elect to the LATAM board of directors any individual designated by TEP Chile unless TEP Chile beneficially owns enough LAN common shares to directly elect two directors to the LATAM board of directors;

the parties agree to vote their LAN common shares to assist the other parties in removing and replacing the directors such other parties elected to the LATAM board of directors;

the parties agree to consult with one another and use their good faith efforts to reach an agreement and act jointly on all actions (other than actions requiring supermajority approval under Chilean law) to be taken by the LATAM board of directors or the LAN shareholders;

the parties agree to maintain the size of the LATAM board of directors at a total of nine directors and to maintain the quorum required for action by the LATAM board of directors at a majority of the total number of directors of the LATAM board of directors; and

if, after good faith efforts to reach an agreement with respect to any action that requires supermajority approval under Chilean law and a mediation period, the parties do not reach such an agreement then TEP Chile has agreed to vote its shares on such supermajority matter as directed by the LAN controlling shareholders, which we refer to as a “directed vote.”

The number of “exempted shares” of TEP Chile means that number of LAN common shares which TEP Chile owns immediately after the effective time in excess of 12.5% of the outstanding LAN common shares at such time as determined on a fully diluted basis.

The parties to the Holdco I shareholders agreement and TAM shareholders agreement have agreed to vote their voting shares of Holdco I and shares of TAM so as to give effect to the agreements with respect to representation on the TAM board of directors discussed above.

Transfer Restrictions

Pursuant to the control group shareholders agreement, the LAN controlling shareholders and TEP Chile are subject to certain restrictions on sales, transfers and pledges of the LAN common shares and (in the case of TEP Chile only) the voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by them. Except for a limited amount of LAN common shares, neither the LAN controlling shareholders nor TEP Chile may sell any of its LAN common shares, and TEP Chile may not sell its voting shares of Holdco I, until the third anniversary of the effective time. Thereafter, sales of LAN common shares by either party are permitted, subject to (i) certain limitations on the volume and frequency of such sales and (ii) in the case of TEP Chile only, TEP Chile satisfying certain minimum ownership requirements. After the tenth anniversary of the effective time, TEP Chile may sell all of its LAN common shares and voting shares of Holdco I as a block, subject to (x) approval of the transferee by the LATAM board of directors, (y) the condition that the sale not have an adverse effect and (z) a right of first offer in favor of the LAN controlling shareholders, which we refer to collectively as “block sale provisions.” An “adverse effect” is defined in the control group shareholders agreement to mean a material adverse effect on our and Holdco I’s ability to own or receive the full benefits of ownership of TAM and its subsidiaries or the ability of TAM and its subsidiaries to operate their airline businesses worldwide. The LAN controlling shareholders have agreed to transfer any voting shares of Holdco I acquired pursuant to such right of first offer to us for the same consideration paid for such shares.

In addition, TEP Chile may sell all LAN common shares and voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by it as a block, subject to satisfaction of the block sale provisions, after the third anniversary of the effective time if a release event (as described below) occurs or if TEP Chile is required to make two or more directed votes during any 24-month period at two meetings (consecutive or not) of the shareholders of LAN held at least 12 months apart and LAN has not yet fully exercised its conversion option described below. A “release event” will occur if (i) a capital increase of LATAM occurs, (ii) TEP Chile does not fully exercise the preemptive rights granted to it under applicable law in Chile with respect to such capital increase in respect of all of its restricted LAN common shares, and (iii) after such capital increase is completed, the individual designated by TEP Chile for election to the board of directors of LATAM with the assistance of the LAN controlling shareholders is not elected to the board of directors of LATAM.

In addition, after the tenth anniversary of the effective time and after the occurrence of the full ownership trigger date (as described below under the “—Conversion Option” section), TEP Chile may sell all or any portion of its LAN common shares, subject to (x) a right of first offer in favor of the LAN controlling shareholders and (y) the restrictions on sales of LAN common shares more than once in a 12-month period.

The control group shareholders agreement provides certain exceptions to these restrictions on transfer for certain pledges of LAN common shares made by the parties and for transfers to affiliates, in each case under certain limited circumstances.

In addition, TEP Chile agreed in the Holdco I shareholders agreement not to vote its voting shares of Holdco I, or to take any other action, in support of any transfer by Holdco I of any equity securities or convertible securities issued by it or by any of TAM or its subsidiaries without our prior written consent.

Restriction on transfer of TAM shares

We agreed in the Holdco I shareholders agreement not to sell or transfer any shares of TAM stock to any person (other than our affiliates) at any time when TEP Chile owns any voting shares of Holdco I. However, we will have the right to effect such a sale or transfer if, at the same time as such sale or transfer, we (or our assignee) acquires all the voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by TEP Chile for an amount equal to TEP Chile’s then current tax basis in such shares and any costs TEP Chile is required to incur to effect such sale or transfer. TEP Chile has irrevocably granted us the assignable right to purchase all of the voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by TEP Chile in connection with any such sale.

Conversion Option

Pursuant to the control group shareholders agreement and the Holdco I shareholders agreement, we have the unilateral right to convert our shares of non-voting stock of Holdco I into shares of voting stock of Holdco I to the maximum extent allowed under law and to increase our representation on the TAM and Holdco I boards of directors if and when permitted in accordance with foreign ownership control laws in Brazil and other applicable laws if the conversion would not have an adverse effect (as defined above under the “—Transfer Restrictions” section).

On or after the tenth anniversary of the effective time and after we have fully converted all of our shares of non-voting stock of Holdco I into shares of voting stock of Holdco I as permitted by Brazilian law and other applicable laws, we will have the right to purchase all of the voting shares of Holdco I held by the controlling shareholders of TAM for an amount equal to their then current tax basis in such shares and any costs incurred by them to effect such sale, which amount we refer to as the “sale consideration.” If we do not timely exercise our right to purchase these shares or if, after the tenth anniversary of the effective time, we have the right under applicable law in Brazil and other applicable law to fully convert all the shares of non-voting stock of Holdco I beneficially owned by us into shares of voting stock of Holdco I and such conversion would not have an adverse effect but we have not fully exercised such right within a specified period, then the controlling shareholders of TAM will have the right to put their shares of voting stock of Holdco I to us for an amount equal to the sale consideration.

Acquisitions of TAM Stock

The parties have agreed that all acquisitions of TAM common shares by any member of the LATAM Group from and after the effective time will be made by Holdco I.

B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

General

We are one of the leading passenger airlinesairline group in LatinSouth America and the main air cargo operator in the region. We currently provide domestic and international passenger services in Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, Colombia and Colombia.Brazil. We carry out our cargo operations through the use of belly space on our passenger flights and dedicated cargo operations using freighter aircraft through our cargo airlines in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico. In 2007, we initiated a strategy for stimulating demand for air travel in our domestic markets by offering lower-fare options to travelers, lowering our costs and increasing the aircraft utilization rates and efficiency of operations. For more information about our short-haul operations see “—Business of the Company—Passenger Operations—Business Model for Domestic Operations” below.

As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, we serviced 15 destinations in Chile, 14 destinations in Peru, 4 destinations in Ecuador, 1714 destinations in Argentina, 23 destinations in Colombia, 42 destinations in Brazil, 15 destinations in other Latin American countries and the Caribbean, 5 destinations in the United States, 26 destinations in Europe and 4 destinations in the South Pacific. In addition, as of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, through our various code-share agreements, we offer service to 29 additional destinations in North America, 17 additional destinations in Europe, 29 additional destinations in Latin America and the Caribbean (including Mexico) and 2 destinations in Asia. We provide cargo service to all our passenger destinations and to approximately 20 additional destinations served only by freighter aircraft. We also offer other services, such as ground handling, courier, logistics, and maintenance.

Competitive Strengths

Our strategy is to maintain LATAM Airlines Group as the leading airline in South America and to maximize shareholder value by increasing revenues and profitability through leveraging the operational efficiencies between our cargo and passenger divisions, thoroughly planning for our expansion efforts and carefully controlling costs. We plan to accomplish these goals by both focusing on our existing competitive strengths and implementing new strategies to fuel our future growth. We believe our most important competitive strengths are:

Leading Presence in Key South American MarketsAmerica

We are one ofThrough a successful regional expansion strategy, LATAM Airlines Group has become the mainleading international and domestic passenger airlinesairline group in LatinSouth America, as well as the largest cargo operator in Chile and most of the South American markets that we serve.Latin America. We hold the largest market share of passenger traffic to and from Chile, Peru and Ecuador, as well as the largest market share of domestic passenger traffic in both Chile and Peru. More recently, we have also achieved a solid and growing position in the Argentine domestic market through Lan Argentina and in the Argentine international market through Lan Argentina and our other passenger airlines. We are also strengthening our presence in the Ecuadorian market, where we began domestic passenger operations on April 6, 2009. We enteredin Chile, Brazil, Peru, Argentina, Colombia and Ecuador. These six countries are the Colombian domesticmost relevant passenger markets in South America (excluding Venezuela) and international market throughrepresent approximately 90% of the acquisition of Aires on November 26, 2010. During 2011 we worked on restructuringpassengers in the company in order to achieve LAN’s standards. As a result, at the end 2011, we rebranded the company to Lan Colombia.region. We are also the leadinglargest operator of intra-regional routes, connecting the main cities in South America. Furthermore, through our significant presence in the largest hubs in South America—Lima and Sao Paulo—we are able to offer the best connectivity between South America and the rest of the world. Finally, the cargo companies of LATAM Airlines Group are the largest air cargo operatoroperators within, to and from SouthLatin America, particularly in Brazil, where we expect to consolidate our position during 2013 through the association of the operations of TAM Cargo and we are consolidating our leadership through new cargo operations in ColombiaABSA, to bring together their highly complementary capacities and in the Brazilian domestic market, as well as through an increased presence in routes between South America and Europe. Our international and domestic passenger and cargo operations have increased substantially over the past five years in terms of capacity, traffic and revenue. Between 2005 and 2011, our passenger capacity grew 82.8% and our cargo capacity grew 50.0%.networks.

Geographically Diversified Revenue Base, fromincluding both Passenger and Cargo Operations

WeThe operations of the LATAM Airlines Group are highly geographically diversified, including domestic operations in six different countries, as well as operations within South America and connecting South America with various international destinations. This provides resilience to external shocks that may occur in any particular market. Furthermore, we believe that one of our distinct competitive advantages is our ability to profitably integrate our scheduled passenger and cargo operations. We take into account potential cargo services when planning passenger routes, and also serve certain dedicated cargo routes using our freightfreighter aircraft, when needed. By adding cargo revenues to our existing passenger service, we are able to increase the productivity of our assets and maximize revenue, which has historically covered fixed operating expenses per flight, lowered break-even load factors and enhanced per flight profitability. Additionally, this revenue diversification helps offset seasonal revenue fluctuations and reduces the volatility of our business over time. As ofFor the year ended December 2011,2012, on a pro forma basis, passenger revenues accounted for 70.1%83.4% of total revenues and cargo revenues accounted for 27.6%14.6% of total revenues.

Attractive Cost Structure with High Utilization of our Assets and Productive Personnel

We believe that we have a highly competitive cost structure with a cost per ATK of 51.4 cents“Low Cost” Business Model in 2011. Our cost advantage arises mainly from our productive and committed employees, high aircraft utilization, modern and fuel-efficient fleet and cost-conscious culture. Our wages and labor costs accounted for approximately 19.6% of total costs in 2011, which we believe is a lower percentage than that of many other U.S. and European carriers.

Furthermore, our itineraries and aircraft rotations are designed to maximize aircraft utilization. During 2011, our long-haul aircraft (Boeing 767-300 passenger and Airbus A340-300s) operated an average of approximately thirteen hours per day. We also implemented a new business model for short-haul operations in 2007; as a result, by the end of 2011 we increased the utilization of our narrow body aircraft to reach 9.5 hours per day. In May 2008, we completed the phase-out of the Boeing B737-200 from our fleet. Our short haul fleet is now entirely composed of Airbus A320-Family Aircraft with the exception of Lan Colombia’s fleet.

In addition, during 2009 we continued with the implementation of LEAN, a system that seeks to improve our processes by eliminating activities that do not add value (thus increasing the value of each activity and suppressing those that are superfluous), which reduces costs, improves efficiency and increases customer satisfaction. The adoption of this system constituted a redesigning of processes that permits solving problems that may occur during the execution of any process, such as aircraft maintenance. The foregoing renders the daily tasks and processes carried out within the Company more efficient. Due to its implementation, during 2011 we achieved a 40% decrease in maintenance delays and a 40% reduction in the turn-around time in certain checks in Chile and Peru. LEAN also allowed us in 2011 to support the Company’s high growth, by streamlining the pilot training process, which resulted in more pilots trained during that year. Finally, it allowed the Company to reduce CO2 emissions, by redesigning processes in various areas that result in a decrease of more than 10 million gallons of fuel consumption. In addition, by establishing clear roles, challenges and achievements, the implementation of LEAN has had an important benefit in terms of employee motivation. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business of the Company—Maintenance.”

Strong Brand Teamed with Key Global Strategic Alliances

In March 2004 we launched the “LAN” brand, under which we operate all of our international passenger airlines. Brand uniformity enables our customers to better identify us with the high standards of service and safety that are common to all of our airlines. This corporate image has also improved the cost effectiveness and efficiency of our marketing efforts as we continue to expand in our existing and new markets. Additionally, LAN and our entire passenger affiliates (with the exception of Lan Colombia) are a member of theoneworld® alliance. We have also entered into bilateral agreements with strategic partners such as American Airlines, Iberia and Qantas, among others, whose leading presence in their respective markets creates a truly global reach for our passengers. Our passenger alliances and commercial agreements provide our customers with approximately 800 travel destinations, a combined reservations system, itinerary flexibility and various other benefits, which substantially enhance our competitive position within the Latin American market.

Optimized Fleet Strategy

We make optimal use of our fleet structure through a combination of minimal aircraft types, modern aircraft and staggered lease maturities. We carefully select our aircraft based on their ability to effectively and efficiently serve our short- and long-haul flight needs, while still striving to minimize the number of aircraft types we operate. For short-haul flights we operate the Airbus A320-Family Aircraft and the recently acquired Lan Colombia’s fleet in the Colombian market. As of May 18, 2008, we stopped using Boeing 737-200 aircraft in our Chilean domestic operations. For long-haul passenger flights we operate the Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft and for long-haul cargo flights we operate the Boeing 767-300 freighters. For ultra long-haul service, such as between Santiago and Madrid and between Santiago and Auckland, we use the Airbus A340-300 aircraft. Having a fleet with minimal aircraft types reduces inventory costs, as fewer spare parts are required, and reduces the need to train our pilots to operate different types of aircraft. LAN’s strategic fleet renewal plan involves the sale of five Airbus A318 aircraft that took place in 2011, plus the sale of other five in 2012 and five in 2013.

The average age of our fleet as of February 29, 2012 was 6.1 years (6.9 years including Lan Colombia’s fleet), making our fleet one of the most modern in Latin America. The phasing out of our Boeing 737-200s, our oldest aircraft, which was completed in May 2008, contributed to reducing the average age of our fleet. Additionally, we expect that our purchase of additional aircraft, to be delivered between 2012 and 2018 will further reduce the average age of our fleet. Having a younger fleet makes us more cost competitive because it reduces fuel consumption and maintenance costs, and enables us to enjoy a high degree of performance reliability. In addition, a modern and fuel efficient fleet reflects our strong commitment to the environment as new aircraft incorporate the industry’s latest technology, allowing for a substantial reduction in emissions, while also decreasing noise levels.

Additionally, our leased fleet is structured with staggered lease maturities over time to create the strategic flexibility to expand or reduce capacity according to market conditions. We believe that our aircraft and the flexibility of our fleet allow us to maximize aircraft utilization by adapting rapidly to changes in passenger and cargo demand in the markets that we serve.

Strong Financial Position with Track Record of Growth and Profitability

We have historically managed our business to maintain financial flexibility and a strong balance sheet in order to accommodate our growth objectives while being able to respond to changing market conditions. We are one of the few investment-grade rated airlines in the world and we maintained this status during 2011. We have built our strong financial position by preserving our financial liquidity and continuing to structure long-term financing for newly acquired aircraft. Our financial flexibility has allowed us to secure large aircraft orders, including an important part of our current re-fleeting program at attractive financing rates. We also monitor and seek opportunities to reduce financial risks associated with currency, interest rate and jet fuel price fluctuations. Over the last five years, while much of the airline industry has faced significant competitive and liquidity crises, we have remained consistently profitable.

Business Strategy

The principal areas in which we plan to focus our efforts going forward are as follows:

Continue to Grow Both our Passenger and Cargo Networks

We currently intend to continue to expand our capacity over the next several years to accommodate robust long-term growth in both passenger and cargo demand in the markets we target. We plan on expanding our operations not only in the markets we currently serve but also into new South American markets where we believe demand exists for our combination of passenger and cargo services. To meet this growth, as of February 29, 2012, we had an order book of 89 latest generation Airbus A320-Family Aircraft to be delivered between 2012 and 2018 and 13 Boeing 767-300 wide body passenger aircraft to be delivered between 2012 and 2013; as of February 29, 2012, we had orders for two Boeing 777-200 freighter aircraft to be delivered in 2012; and as of February 29, 2012 we also have outstanding orders for 32 Boeing 787 Dreamliner passenger aircraft, currently expected to start to be delivered in 2012.

We will continue to leverage the benefits of combining our passenger and cargo operations. Our passenger and cargo operations are equally important aspects of our business, and we dedicate the necessary resources, employees, facilities, management and fleet to enable both operations to provide high-quality service and to compete effectively in their respective markets.

Enhance the Profitability of our Short-HaulDomestic Operations

We plancontinue to continue implementingutilize the business model LAN launched in 2007 to increase the efficiency of our domestic and short-haul operations specifically in the domestic markets in Chile, and Peru. This model is also being applied in the domestic markets inPeru, Ecuador, Colombia, and, Argentina, as well as in our recently acquired passenger operations in Colombia. In Argentina, the implementation of the model is subject to certain regulatory restrictions, as a result of the fare bands in place in the Argentinean domestic market.Argentina. In addition, we are evaluating the application ofapply these initiatives on certain regional routes within Latin America.America and we are exploring opportunities to apply aspects of this model to the domestic passenger operations in Brazil. A key objective of this programbusiness model has been to increase the utilization of our fleet through modified itineraries that include more point-to-point and overnight flights and faster turnaround times. Our Boeing 737-200 fleet was completely phased out in May 2008 in favor of the newLATAM operates Airbus A320-Family Aircraft which we currently operate on all domestic and regional routes except thosesome routes served by LanLAN Colombia. These initiatives haveThis fleet has increased efficiency and improved the margins of our short-haul operations. In addition, our modern fleet allows for lower unscheduled maintenance costs, lower fuel consumption, and operational and cost efficiencies achieved through operating fewer

fleet types. Other key objectives of this business model include a reduction in sales and distribution costs through increased Internet penetration, reduced agency commissions, and increased self check-in service through web check-in and airport kiosks. We expect that these initiatives, together with simplifications in back-office and support functions, will continue to help us expand operations while controlling fixed costs, spurring a reduction in overhead costs per ASK. We have begun to pass on a portion of these operating efficiencies to consumers through fare reductions, which has stimulated additional demand and enhanced our overall profitability.

Modern Fleet and Optimized Fleet Strategy

The average age of our fleet is 6.7 years, making our fleet one of the most modern in Latin America and in the world. A younger fleet makes us more cost competitive because it reduces fuel consumption and maintenance costs, and enables us to enjoy a high degree of performance reliability. In addition, a modern and fuel efficient fleet reflects our strong commitment to the environment as new aircraft incorporate the industry’s latest technology, allowing for a substantial reduction in emissions, while also decreasing noise levels.

We optimize our fleet structure through the careful selection of modern aircraft models and staggered lease maturities. We select our aircraft based on their ability to effectively and efficiently serve our short—and long-haul flight needs, while still striving to minimize the number of different aircraft types we operate. For short-haul flights, we principally operate the Airbus A320-Family Aircraft. We are in the process of replacing the fleet used by LAN Colombia—which is our only domestic short-haul fleet that includes Boeing 737 and Dash 8-200 aircraft—with Airbus A320 Family Aircraft. This change in the fleet will allow us to generate important cost savings. For long-haul passenger flights, we operate the Boeing 767-300, Airbus A330, Airbus A340-300 and Boeing 777 aircrafts, and, in October 2012, we started operations with the new modern and efficient Boeing 787 Dreamliner, becoming the first airline in the Americas to operate this brand new aircraft. This aircraft has new technologies in aerodynamics, materials and coatings which allows us to achieve important savings on fuel consumption and also achieve sustainable expansion of our fleet (as the Dreamliner produces up to 20% less CO2 than similar aircraft) while incorporating modern technology to deliver the best travel experience for LATAM’s passengers. Our current fleet plan also includes the delivery of Airbus A350 passenger aircraft starting in 2016, a new aircraft type that is expected to further improve the efficiency of the existing fleet.

Following the combination of LAN and TAM, we are focused on the rationalization of the LAN and TAM fleets and as we acquire additional aircraft, we will use the same configurations across our various airlines to unify our product offerings and reach higher levels of efficiency.

Efficient Processes

We continue to implement LEAN, a system that seeks to improve our processes by eliminating activities that do not add value (thus increasing the value of each activity and suppressing those that are superfluous), which reduces costs, improves efficiency and increases customer satisfaction. Internationally, the LEAN system has been recognized as a methodology for achieving excellence and continuous improvement. The adoption of this system constituted a redesigning of processes to enable us to solve problems that may occur during the execution of any process, such as aircraft maintenance. The foregoing renders the daily tasks and processes carried out within LATAM more efficient. Since the merger, we have achieved important fuel savings by implementing the LEAN fuel program in TAM’s operations, resulting in more than 1 million gallons saved as of December 2012. LEAN also supports the Company’s growth plans by streamlining the pilot training process, which results in more pilots trained during the year. By establishing clear roles, challenges and achievements, the implementation of LEAN has also had an important benefit in terms of employee motivation.

Strong Brands Teamed with Key Global Strategic Alliances

Following the business combination, both LAN and TAM continue to operate under their existing brands in the same way as they have done until previously. We believe that both the LAN and TAM brands are associated with superior service, aircraft and technologically-advanced operations, and are well recognized and respected in their respective markets. In 2012, we also focused on enhancing our corporate image as LATAM Airlines Group, which allows us to unify marketing efforts as we continue to expand in our existing and new markets.

Our strategic global alliances and existing commercial agreements provide our customers with access to approximately 163 destinations worldwide, a combined reservations system, itinerary flexibility and various other benefits, which substantially enhance our competitive position within the Latin American market. In addition, in 2012, we entered into new bilateral agreements with strategic partners such as American Airlines which signed new agreements with LAN Colombia and TAM, and broadened our network of alliances in the combination with TAM, which maintains commercial agreements with a number of leading airlines. During 2014, TAM will also join theoneworld® alliance, of which LAN is currently a member.

Track Record of Growth and Profitability and Access to Financing

We have historically managed our business to maintain financial flexibility and a strong balance sheet in order to accommodate our growth objectives while being able to respond to changing market conditions. Our financial flexibility has allowed us to secure large aircraft orders, including an important part of our current re-fleeting program, at attractive financing rates.

Recognized Loyalty Programs

TAM Fidelidade and LANPASS together represent the leading frequent flyer programs in South America, with strong participation rates and brand recognition by our customers. Customers in each program earn points or kilometers based on distance flown and class of ticket purchased, or by using other services of partners in the program. In addition, TAM’s Multiplus program, which was launched in 2009, allows members to accumulate points not just by flying with TAM, but also by making purchases through credit cards or using services and products at partner establishments, and to redeem points for TAM flights and other products at partner establishments. At the end of 2012, Multiplus had 200 partner establishments, including the TAM Fidelidade Program. Following the business combination between LAN and TAM, we have begun to harmonize the two airlines’ frequent flyer programs to make them fully fungible for our customers, and have advanced cost initiatives related to the contract renegotiations and process standardization.

We regard both of our frequent flyer programs as strong relationship tools and we believe that these flexible programs are attractive to customers because they do not impose restrictions on flights for which points can be redeemed or the number of seats available to members using the loyalty program for any particular flight. LANPASS members can accrue and redeem points for flights with any of LAN’s alliance carriers, including on oneworld® flights, and TAM Fidelidade members can accrue and redeem points for flights with any of TAM’s alliance carriers, including members of the Star Alliance (through 2014). During 2012, LANPASS reached new agreements with several partners in each specific market in which LAN operates, creating a strong position in the Spanish-speaking Latin American markets.

Business Strategy

The principal areas in which we plan to focus our efforts going forward are as follows:

Achieve the Successful Integration of LAN and TAM, and Realize Merger Synergies

In the short term, we are focused on achieving a successful integration process between LAN and TAM, which we believe will result in significant operational efficiencies, incremental revenues and a strong improvement in the cash flow generation of the combined business. Although the business combination and integration process requires us to incur one-time costs (US$59.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 on a pro forma basis), we believe that passengers of both LAN and TAM are directly benefiting from improved connectivity, cross-selling and easier access to more destinations via LATAM’s expanded network and code-share destinations. LATAM has established new and improved agreements with international carriers, has aligned certain commercial practices and aspects of the on-board product for certain routes, and implemented new operations on regional routes. LATAM has also completed the integration of the international cargo systems of LAN and TAM, which allows for increased efficiencies in the distribution network.

Turnaround of Our Domestic Passenger Operations in Brazil.

We expect to achieve significant improvements in our domestic Brazil operations, mainly through (i) capacity discipline (with a 5%—7% capacity decrease expected for 2013); (ii) improved passenger segmentation, which led to a 10 point improvement in load factors during the second half of 2012, reaching 73.6% for the full year 2012; and (iii) the implementation of cost efficiencies in our domestic Brazilian operations, which has been successful in Chile, Peru, Ecuador and Argentina. As a result, we expect to drive strong improvements in revenue per ASK, which, together with cost efficiencies and reduced costs per ASK, are expected to improve the profitability of TAM’s Brazilian operations.

Improve our Capital Structure

LATAM Airlines Group is focused on developing a solid balance sheet, which we believe is a competitive advantage in the airline industry to facilitate access to fleet financing and provide resilience to the volatility inherent to airline operations. Following the business combination between LAN and TAM, we have significantly increased our outstanding indebtedness and aircraft purchase obligations. In the near-term, we are focused on improving our capital structure, by improving cash flow generation of the business and actively managing capacity in our passenger and cargo businesses. The near-term fleet plans of LAN and TAM, including for the 2013 and 2014 years, were developed separately, prior to the association of these airlines. The LATAM Airlines Group has rationalized the fleet plans of LAN and TAM into a joint fleet management plan, which we expect to result in a decrease in expected fleet capital expenditures for the coming years. This reduction in capital expenditures reflects capacity reductions in the domestic Brazil operations, as well as reduced growth estimates for our international passenger business.

Maintain Excellent Customer Satisfaction

In both our passenger and cargo businesses, we focus on delivering high quality services that are valued by our customers. In our passenger businesses we strive to achieve high on-time performance, world-class on-board service on long-haul flights, attractive and convenient pricing, and quick check-in for short-haul flights, and the comfort afforded by a modern fleet. During the first half of 2009 weLAN completed the reconfiguration of the cabins of all ourits long-haul aircraft, including both the Boeing 767 and the Airbus A340 passenger aircraft, in order to incorporate our new Premium Business Class including full-flat seats, as well as improvements in economy class which include a state-of-the-art on-board entertainment system. This high quality standard is shared by TAM, which offers first and business class in all its long haul flights as well as in some regional routes. Our frequent flyer program,programs, LANPASS providesand TAM Fidelidade, provide travel benefits and rewards to almost 5.8more than 6 million loyal customers in Chile, Argentina, Peru, Ecuador and EcuadorColombia as well asto more than 10 million members in other countries where we operate.Brazil. In the cargo business, we focus on providing reliable service, taking advantage of our ability to handle different types of cargo as well as significant cargo volumes, and leveraging our facilities in key gateways, such as Miami, to ensure optimal handling of our customers’ needs. We continually assess opportunities to incorporate service improvements in order to respond effectively to our customers’ needs.

Continued Emphasis on Safety

Our top priority is safety, and we have structured our operations and maintenance to focus on safe flying. Our main maintenance facilities are certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), DGAC and other civil aviation authorities. Our flight and maintenance safety procedures are certified under ISO 9001-2000 standards. We have programs in place to train our crews and mechanics to world-class standards both at facilities abroad or at our training centers, which we have developed in association with high-quality partners.

Focus on Efficiency and Sustainability

We are increasingly concerned withfocused on improving efficiency through a series of fleet initiatives that seek to reduce fuel consumption. The most significant is our ongoing fleet renewal and growth plan, through which we expect to incorporate 136206 new aircraft between 20122013 and 2018.2019, which we expect will contribute to lower costs per ASK. As an example, we estimate that the Boeing 787 Dreamliner operates with costs per ASK that are approximately 12% lower than other long haul passenger aircraft, while the new Boeing 777 freighter operates with costs per ASKATK that are approximately 17% lower than the Boeing 767

freighter. freighter, and the Airbus A350 will operate with costs per ASK that are approximately 25% lower than the Airbus A330. In addition, we continue withcompleted the installation of winglets on all of ourLAN’s existing Boeing 767 aircraft, achieving average fuel efficiencies of approximately 5% per aircraft. aircraft per year since implementation. We are also in the process of installing sharklets (a type of winglet) in our Airbus A320 Family fleet, which we expect to result in further fuel efficiencies in this fleet.

In order to mitigate the environmental impact of our operations we seek to operate in a sustainable manner by reducing our fuel consumption and related emissions. We also continue to focus on adjusting the configuration of our aircraft to market demand by, for example, adjusting the configuration of fourcertain Boeing 767s that operate on long-haul routes from Ecuador by reducing the number of Premium Business seats and increasing the number of Economy class seats. Other long-term projects that aim at improving our cost structure include implementing

During 2012, LAN also replaced its passenger service system, containing the LEAN operating processes in our maintenance operations, as well as investing in newreservation, inventory and reservationsdeparture control systems of the airline, with a new system provided by Sabre. The conversion process involved moving from two suppliers (Amadeus and Resiber), whose systems were previously required to cover the complete role of the passenger service system, to a single supplier (Sabre), and is expected to result in substantial savings over the coming years.

Airline Operations and Route Network

We are one of the main air transport operatorsoperator in Latin America. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, we operated passenger airlines in Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, Colombia and Colombia.Brazil. We are also the largest air cargo operator in the region.region, with the broadest network of cargo destinations served in Latin America.

The following table sets forth our operating revenues by activity for the periods indicated:indicated, which for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes TAM’s revenues since June 23, 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, represent the historical consolidated revenues of LAN:

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
  2011   2010   2009   2012
LATAM
   2011
LAN
   2010
LAN
 
  (in US$ millions)   (in US$ millions) 

The Company(1)

      

Total passenger revenues

   4,008.9     3,109.8     2,623.6     7,978.7     4,008.9     3,109.8  

Total cargo revenues

   1,576.5     1,280.7     895.6     1,743.5     1,576.5     1,280.7  

Total traffic revenues

   5,585.4     4,390.5     3,519.2     9,722.2     5,585.4     4,390.5  

 

(1)

Consolidated informationSee Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—LATAM Airlines Group Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2012 (Pro forma) compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (Pro forma)—Pro Forma Adjustments” for a discussion of our pro forma operating revenues for the Company.

years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, which totaled US$13,005.7 million and $13,028.3 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth our operating revenues by point of sale, which for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes TAM’s revenues since June 23, 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, represent the historical consolidated revenues of LAN:

   Year ended December 31, 
   2012
LATAM
   2011
LAN
   2010
LAN
 
   (in US$ millions) 

Peru

   620.3     557.5     553.5  

Argentina

   890.2     616.6     497.0  

U.S.A.

   1,268.6     1,135.9     857.6  

Europe

   738.8     523.7     447.7  

Colombia

   366.7     367.6     103.4  

Brazil

   3,334.2     258.3     198.9  

Ecuador

   266.3     228.9     184.4  

Chile

   1,525.0     1,312.4     1,117.2  

Asia Pacific and rest of Latin America

   712.2     584.4     430.9  

Total Operating Revenues

   9,722.2     5,585.4     4,390.5  

Passenger Operations

General

As of February 29,December 31, 2012, our passenger operations were performed through airlines in Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, Colombia and ColombiaBrazil, where we operate both domestic and international services.

As of February 29, 2012, our network consisted of 15 destinations in Chile, 14 destinations in Peru, five destinations in Ecuador, 17 destinations in Argentina, 23 destinations in Colombia, 14 destinations in other Latin American countries and the Caribbean, five destinations in the United States, two destinations in Europe and four destinations in the South Pacific. Within Latin America, we have routes to and from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela. We also fly to a variety of international destinations outside Latin America, including Auckland, Fort Lauderdale, Frankfurt, Los Angeles, Madrid, Miami, New York, Papeete (Tahiti), San Francisco, and Sydney. In addition, as of February 29, 2012, through our various code-share agreements, we offer service to 29 additional destinations in North America, 17 additional destinations in Europe, 29 additional destinations in Latin America and the Caribbean (including Mexico), and two destinations in Asia.

The following table sets forth certain of our passenger operating statistics on a pro forma basis (except where noted) for international and domestic routes for the periods indicated.indicated:

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 

The Company(1) (2)

      

ASKs (million)

      

International

   32,086.7     29,582.8     26,797.10  

Domestic

   16,052.9     12,772.4     11,979.10  

Total

   48,139.6     42,355.2     38,776.20  

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended and as at December 31, (1) 
  2011 2010 2009   LATAM
2012
(Pro
forma)
 LATAM
2011
(Pro
forma)
 2010
LAN

(Actual)
 

ASKs (million) (at period end)

    

International

   65,890.9    61,763.8    29,582.8  

Domestic

   66,557.8    64,801.6    12,772.4  

Total

   132,448.7    126,565.4    42,355.2  

RPKs (million)

        

International

   25,935.6    23,226.4    20,861.20     53,634.3    50,075.5    23,226.4  

Domestic

   12,487.3    9,921.1    8,975.00     49,920.8    46,005.6    9,921.1  

Total

   38,422.9    33,147.5    29,836.20     103,555.1    96,081.2    33,147.5  

Passengers (thousands)

        

International

   7,076.2    6,302    5,676     13,278    11,999    6,302  

Domestic

   15,514.7    10,991    9,730     51,579    48,284    10,991  

Total

   22,509.9    17,293    15,406     64,857    60,283    17,293  

Passenger yield (passenger revenues/RPKs, in US cents)

        

International

  US¢9.5   US¢8.7   US¢8.0     US¢9.3    US¢9.4    US¢8.7  

Domestic

  US¢12.3   US¢10.8   US¢10.4     US¢12.2    US¢13.3    US¢10.8  

Combined yield(3)

  US¢10.4   US¢9.4   US¢8.8  

Combined yield(2)

   US¢10.7    US¢10.4    US¢9.4  

Passenger load factor (%)

        

International

   80.8  78.5  77.8   81.7  80.8  78.5

Domestic

   77.8  77.7  74.9   78.7  77.8  77.7

Combined load factor(4)

   79.8  78.3  76.9

Combined load factor

   80.7  79.8  78.3

 

(1)Information provided for the Companyyear ended and as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, includes domestic operations of LAN in Chile, Peru, Argentina, and Ecuador. These figures doEcuador, but does not include any operating statistics from Lan Colombia. Information provideddata for TAM’s domestic operations in Brazil during such period, or for LAN Colombia (which was acquired in 2010). Pro forma operating data for the Companyyear ended and as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consolidates Lanhas been prepared to include historical operating statistics of TAM for each period, and also includes the operating data of LAN Ecuador, LanLAN Argentina, Lan PerúLAN Peru and LanLAN Colombia. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—LATAM Airlines Group Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2012 (Pro forma) compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (Pro forma)” for a discussion of our pro forma operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
(2)Domestic passenger operations as ofThe combined yield is not presented on a pro forma basis. 2012 combined yield is based on LATAM’s actual operating data for the year ended December 31, 20092012, which includes TAM’s results from June 23, 2012, and December 31, 2010 include domestic operations in Chile, Peru, Argentina and Ecuador. These figures do not include operating statistics from Lan Colombia. Figures as offor the year ended December 31, 2011 include domestic passenger operations in Chile, Peru, Argentina, Ecuador and Colombia.2010, represents LAN’s historical operating data.
(3)Aggregate international and domestic passenger yield.
(4)Aggregate international and domestic passenger load factor.

International Passenger Operations

As of February 29, 2012, we28, 2013, LATAM operated scheduled international services from Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, Colombia and ColombiaBrazil through Lan Airlines; LanLATAM Airlines Group; LAN Express in Chile; LanLAN Peru in Peru; LanLAN Ecuador in Ecuador; LanLAN Argentina in Argentina, and LanLAN Colombia in Colombia.Colombia and TAM in Brazil. International passenger traffic has grown significantly in the past couple of years due to demand growth, market share gains, increased connecting traffic to and from other Latin American countries, the launch of new routes and additional frequencies on existing routes, and expansion into new markets.

Our international network combines our Chilean, Peruvian, Ecuadorian, Argentinean, Colombian and Colombian affiliates.Brazilian subsidiaries. We have operated international services out of Chile since 1946, and1946. Over time we have greatly expanded our international services, offering flights out of Peru with the creation of LanLAN Peru in 1999, and out of Ecuador through Lanthe creation of LAN Ecuador in 2003. In2003, and out of Argentina with LAN Argentina in August 2006, we expanded our international operations through Lan Argentina, which until then had only been offering domestic flights. Theflights, and out of Colombia in 2010, following the acquisition of Aires. Most recently, our international operationsservices grew significantly with the business combination between LAN and TAM. As of Lan Colombia, however, are being reduced since its acquisition in 2010. ThisFebruary 28, 2013, we now offer 24 of international destinations.

Our strategy to generally expand our international network is aimed at enhancing our value proposition by offering customers more destinations and routing alternatives, maximizing aircraft utilization, increasing load factors, leveraging complementary seasonal patterns, and optimizing our commercial efforts. Our sustained development of our international network has been a crucial factor in our long-term growth. We provide long-haul services out of our fiveseven main hubs in Santiago, Lima, Guayaquil, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Sao Paulo and Bogota.Rio de Janeiro. We also provide regional services from Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, Colombia and Colombia.Brazil. Since 2004, we have growncontinued to consolidate our intra-Latinhub in Lima, which serves as the center of our Latin American operationsnetwork and also complements our intercontinental network, by opening new routes and increasing flights on existing routes out of Lima to position it as our main regional hub.Lima.

The following table sets forth the international destinations served from each of the aforementioned countries as of February 29, 2012:28, 2013:

 

Country of Origin

  

Destination

  

Number of
Destinations

Destinations

Chile

  

Argentina

3
Bolivia2
Brazil2
Colombia1
Ecuador2
Peru1
Uruguay1
Venezuela1
Dominican Republic1
Mexico2
United States  4
  Spain1
Germany1
New Zealand1
Falkland Islands1
French Polynesia1

Peru

Argentina1
Bolivia

  2
  Brazil1
Chile1
Colombia3
Cuba1
Ecuador2

Brazil

Country of Origin

Destination

Number of
Destinations
Venezuela1
Mexico  2
  

Colombia

United States
4
Dominican Republic  1
  Spain1

EcuadorBrazil

Argentina  1
  

Peru

Chile
2
Colombia  1
  

Uruguay

Peru
  1
  

Venezuela

Uruguay
  1
  

Dominican Republic

Venezuela
  1
  

Mexico

Paraguay
  2
  

United States

3

Spain

Mexico
  1
  

Germany

United States
4
France  1
  

New Zealand

Germany
  1
  

Falkland Islands

United Kingdom
  1
  Italy1

French PolynesiaEcuador

Argentina  1
  

Australia

Chile
  1

Peru

  

Argentina

Colombia
  2
  

Bolivia

United States
  2
  Peru1
Spain1

Argentina

Brazil

  2
  

Chile

  1
  

Colombia

Dominican Republic
  31
  

Ecuador

  2
  United States2
Peru1

VenezuelaColombia

Brazil  1
  

Mexico

2

United States

4

Dominican Republic

Chile
  1
  

Spain

1

Ecuador

Argentina

Perú
  1
  

Chile

Ecuador
  1
  

Colombia

1

United States

2

Spain

1

Argentina

United States

1

Brazil

1

Chile

1

Dominican Republic

1

Peru

1

Colombia

Chile

1

Perú

1

Ecuador

1

United States

  1

In line with our long-standing commitment to provide customers with superior service and the best products on the market, in May 2009 LANwe completed the retrofit of all itsof our long-haul fleet (including itsour Boeing 767 and Airbus A340 passenger aircraft) with the new Premium Business class and improved Economy class. Combining the best features of the traditional First and Business classes, the new Premium Business includes 180 degrees recline full-flat seats which allow passengers to sleep with the maximum comfort and privacy. Premium Business also includes top-level personalized in-flight service. Changes in Economy class include new seats with a greater recline angle, a cushion that slides forward for increased comfort and convenience, and larger individual video monitors for each seat.

During 2012, LATAM received the first three Boeing 787-8 Dreamliners, out of an order of 32, and became the first airline in the Americas (and one of the first in the world) to operate this modern and efficient aircraft. The configuration of the cabin on the Boeing 787-8 aircraft includes 217 economy class seats and 30 seats for Premium Business class. One of the new features offered in the new Premium Business class cabin is a 100% horizontal full flat seat with the same dimensions of our current seat that includes foot support, a memory system that records the seat position chosen by the user and lumbar massage, and our new Economy class features reclining ergonomic

LAN’s sustained developmentseats. The incorporation of its coverage has been a crucial factorthe Boeing 787-8 Dreamliners into our fleet will allow us to achieve important savings on fuel consumption and the sustainable expansion of our fleet (as the Dreamliner produces up to 20% less CO2 than similar aircraft), while incorporating modern technology to deliver the best travel experience for our passengers. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—We have invested in its growth and 2011 was no exception. New routesnew Boeing 787 “Dreamliner” aircraft, which were added along with flight increases in some key existing routes in order to offer more and better alternatives to both business and tourist travelers. In 2011,recently grounded by the Company continued to consolidate its hub in Lima, which serves as the center of its Latin American network and also complements its intercontinental network, by opening new routes and increasing flights on existing routes.Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”).”

As part of its mission, LANLATAM seeks to promote tourism to South America. Due to its large network of services, visitors from around the world can experience world renowned destinations such as Cusco, Easter Island, the Galapagos Islands, Iguazu Falls in Brazil, or Patagonia in Chile and Argentina, including the cities of Punta Arenas, Ushuaia, El Calafate and Bariloche.

According to the Chilean JAC data, Chilean international air passenger traffic increased 17.2%16.5% from 20102011 to 2011, totaling approximately 6.0 million passengers,2012 as measured in RPK.RPK, totaling approximately 6.9 million passengers in 2012. We had 51.3%54.4% of the international market share in Chile in 2011,2012, which was a decrease compared to 52.8%54.6% in 2010.2011 as measured in RPK. Our Chilean international operations can be divided into four main segments based on the destination: to North America, to Europe, the rest ofto other countries in Latin America, and to the Pacific. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, our main competitors on direct routes between Chile and North America included American Airlines, Delta Airlines, Avianca-Taca, Air Canada and Aeromexico. TACA and COPA also participated in the Chile-North American markets with stopovers in their respectiveits Central American hubs.hub in Panama City. Our main competitors on routes between Chile and Europe were Air France-KLM and Iberia. On regional routes our main competitors included Aerolineas Argentinas, Air Canada, Avianca, GOL, TACAAvianca-Taca and TAM. We were the only airline operating between Chile and the South Pacific during this time.GOL.

According to Peruvian DGAC data, Peruvian international air passenger traffic increased 14.3%18.0% from 20102011 to 2011,2012 as measured in RPK, totaling approximately 5.86.8 million passengers as measured by the number of passengers.in 2012. We had 46.3%47.5% of the international market share in Peru in 2011,2012, which was an increasea decrease compared to 43.9%48.0% in 2010.2011 as measured by number of passengers. Our Peruvian international operations can be divided into three main segments based on the destination: to North America, to Europe and the rest ofto other countries in Latin America. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, our main competitors on direct routes between Peru and North America included American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Spirit Airlines,Avianca-Taca, Aeromexico and Air Canada and Aeromexico. TACA andCanada. COPA also participated in the Peru-North American markets with stopovers in theirits respective Central American hubs.hub. On routes to Europe, our main competitors were Iberia, Air EuropaFrance-KLM and Air France-KLM.Lufthansa. On regional routes our main competitors included included Aerolineas Argentinas, TACA, TAM, AviancaAvianca-Taca and GOL.

According to our internal estimates and travel agency statistics (captured through IATA Billing Settlement Plan or “BSP”), Ecuadorian international air passenger traffic increased 6.0%4.0% from 20102011 to 2011,2012, as measured in RPK totaling approximately 3.03.11 million passengers.passengers in 2012. We had 31.0%26.0% of the international market share in LATAM routes from Ecuador in 2011,2012, which was an increase compared to 28.7%24.2% in 2010.2011. Our Ecuadorian international operations can be divided into three main segments, based on the destination: to North America, Europe and the rest ofto other countries in Latin America. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, our main competitors on direct routes between Ecuador and North America included American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Delta Airlines and Aerogal. TACAAirlines; Avianca–Taca and COPA also participate in the Ecuador-North American markets with stopovers in their respective Central American hubs. On routes to Europe, our main competitors included Air Comet, Iberia, KLM and Air France-KLM.Avianca-Taca. On regional routes, our main competitors included TACA, COPAAvianca-Taca and Avianca.Copa.

According to our internal estimates and travel agency statistics (captured through BSP), Argentinean international air passenger traffic increased 9.0%17% from 20102011 to 2011,2012 as measured in RPK, totaling approximately 9.94.7 million passengers. Wepassengers in 2012. LAN Argentina had 19.4%23% of the international market share in Argentina in 2011,2012, which was an increaseremained flat when compared to 16.5% in 2010. Our2011. The Argentinean international operations can be divided into two main segments based on the destination: to North America and the rest ofto other countries in Latin America. As of February 29, 2012, ourMarch 26, 2013, the main competitors on the Buenos Aires-Miami route included American Airlines and Aerolíneas Argentinas. TAM, TACAAvianca-Taca and COPA also participated in the Argentina-North American markets with stopovers in their respective hubs. OurThe main competitors on the Buenos Aires-Dominican Republic route included COPA and American Airlines. OurThe main competitors on the Buenos Aires-Sao Paulo route included TAM, GOL and Aerolíneas Argentinas. OurThe main competitors on the Buenos Aires-Lima route included TACAAvianca-Taca and Aerolíneas Argentinas. OurThe main competitors on the Buenos Aires-Santiago route included Aerolíneas Argentinas and Air Canada.Canada and Sky Airline.

According toAeronautica Civil(Colombian (Colombian Civil Aeronautics), the Colombian international market increased 12.8%10.5% from October 31, 20102011 to October 31, 2011, totaling approximately 5.7 million passengers,2012 as measured in RPK. The international passenger marketRPK, from 7.0 million passengers to approximately 7.8 million passengers in 2012. LAN Colombia for the full year 2010 was 6.2 million passengers. We had 4.6%a 3.1% share of the international market share in Colombia asin 2012. During the second quarter of October 31, 2011,2013, LAN Colombia expect to operate two Boeing 767s on current weekly routes to Miami and Sao Paulo, which was a decline comparedwill allow it to 6.0% as of October 31, 2010 (including Aires figures, before its acquisitionsignificantly improve the international product by LAN). Ouroffering Premium Business on these flights, and strengthen the international market position. The international operations in Colombia can be divided in two business segments based on destination: to North America and the rest ofto other countries in Latin America. As of February 29, 2012, our28, 2013, the main competitors on direct routes between Colombia and North America included Avianca,Avianca-Taca, American Airlines, United Airlines, Air Canada, Delta Airlines and Aerogal.Aeromexico. COPA also participated in the Colombia-North American markets with stopovers in its Central American hub. On regional routes, ourthe main competitors included TACA, COPAAvianca-Taca and Avianca.COPA.

According to Brazilian ANAC data, Brazilian international air passenger traffic increased 3.5% from 2011 to 2012 as measured in number of passengers, totaling approximately 9.1 million passengers in 2012. TAM had 89.4% of the international market share in Brazil in 2012 when considering only Brazilian airlines, which was an increase compared to 88.0% in 2011. Our Brazilian international operations can be divided into three main segments, based on destination: to North America, to Europe and to other countries in Latin America. As of February 28, 2013, the main competitors on direct routes between Brazil and North America included American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Air Canada and Aeromexico. Avianca-Taca also participated in the Brazil-North American markets with stopovers in its Central American hub. On routes to Europe, the main competitors were Iberia, Air France-KLM, Lufthansa, TAP and Air Europa. On regional routes the main competitors included Aerolineas Argentinas, Avianca-Taca and GOL.

Domestic Passenger Operations

LATAM provides domestic passenger services within Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina and Colombia, through LAN, LAN Express and regional subsidiaries, including LAN Peru, LAN Ecuador, LAN Argentina and LAN Colombia, and, in Brazil, through TAM Linhas Aereas.

Business Model for Domestic Operations

In 2007, we initiated an important projecta new business model to redesign our domestic business operations with the goal of developing the industry and increasing efficiency and improving the margins of LAN’s short-haul operations, specifically with respect to ourthe domestic operations in Chile and Peru. The new business model was first tested in the last quarter of 2006. A key element of this projectbusiness model has been to significantly increase the utilization of our narrow body fleet, which we have been successfully achieving through modified itineraries including more point-to-point and overnight flights. We removed the Boeing 737-200 aircraft from our fleet in favor of the new more efficient Airbus A320-Family Aircraft. The Airbus A320-Family Aircraft fleet utilization reached approximately 9.849.4 block hours per day in 2011.2012. The transition to a newer fleet allows for lower unscheduled maintenance costs as well as cost efficiencies achieved through operating fewer fleet types and operational efficiencies, including lower fuel consumption.

OtherAnother key elementselement of our newthis business model areis the reduction in sales and distribution costs through higher Internetinternet penetration and reduced agency commissions, a faster turnaround time and increased self-check-in service through web check-in and kiosks at airports. These initiatives, together with simplifications in back-office and support functions, will continue to allow us to expand operations while controlling fixed costs, spurring a reduction in overhead costs. We have begun to pass on these operating efficiencies to consumers through significant fare reductions, which we expect will have a strong effect ofin stimulating new demand.

In 2007, we implemented all aspects of this new business model in the Chilean and Peruvian domestic markets. We launched our new short-haulmarkets, and began to implement the business model on all domestic routes in Chile in April 2007, after a marketing campaignArgentina that same year. In 2009 we began in March 2007. We launched the newto implement this business model in all domestic Peruvian routes in January 2007.Ecuador as well.

As a result of the implementation of this business model, we increased the number of passengers transported in all domestic markets. Between 2006 and 2011, the number of passengers transported increased significantly:has increased:

 

112%151% (from 2.5 million to 5.36.3 million) in Chile, from 2006 to 2012,

 

123%162% (from 1.7 million to 3.94.5 million) in Peru, from 2006 to 2012,

 

200%267% (from 0.6 million to 1.92.3 million) in Argentina, from 2006 to 2012, and

 

with a minor effect11% (from 3.3 million to 3.7 million) in Ecuador, as we just started domestic operations during 2009.from 2009 to 2012.

Over the past three years we have sustained constant growth in each of our domestic passenger operations, and between 2010 and 2011 we achieved an increase in domestic transported passengers at 11% which include operations within Chile, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador.

We plan to continue with the implementation of this business model during 20122013 in Colombia and Brazil and we are evaluatinghave started its implementation in some regional routes, as we look for ways to increase operational efficiency, encourage direct sales and self check-in, and implement new sales strategies aimed at stimulating demand.

Operations within Chile

Through Lan AirlinesLAN and LanLAN Express, we are the leading domestic passenger airline in Chile. We have operated domestic flights in Chile since the Company’s creation in 1929. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013 we flew to 1315 destinations within Chile (including Santiago, but not including Easter Island, which we consider an international destination even though it is a part of Chile, because we serve it with long-haul aircraft) as well as some seasonal destinations. Lan AirlinesOur services in Chile also include new destination, Chiloé, to which we began service in 2012. LAN and LanLAN Express have integrated passenger operations, including operations under the same two-letter “designator reservation code,” and have coordinated fare structures, scheduling and other commercial matters in order to maximize cooperative benefits and revenues for the two carriers. Our strategy is based on providing frequent service to Chile’s main destinations, offering a reliable and high quality service, and leveraging our strong brand position in Chile and abroad. We evaluate our network of domestic routes on an ongoing basis in order to achieve optimal operational efficiency and profitability. Our strategic objective is to maintain our leadership position in our domestic routes.

During 20112012 we operated an average fleet of 2125 Airbus A320-Family Aircraft in the Chilean domestic market, and we plan to operate an average fleet of 2426 Airbus A320-Family Aircraft in 2012.2013. Domestic operations in Chile werehave been positively affected by the greater utilization of the latest-generation Airbus fleet and the retirement of the Boeing 737-200s. Nowadays, LAN’sAirbus A318-100s. Currently, LATAM’s domestic fleet in Chile has an average age of 3 years.

The new business model was launched nationwide within Chile in April 2007. We reduced sales costs by increasing direct sales to 80% in 2011 (with 63% of our 2011 sales done through the Internet) and by reducing agency commissions from 6% to 1% in February 2007. We also increased fleet utilization, crew productivity and the average flight leg through schedule changes. Additionally, we simplified our processes, which helped to increase the self check-in rate from 81.5% in 2010 to 82.7% in 2011. Finally, we utilized the greater efficiency of the Airbus aircraft to reach operational efficiencies such as reducing the turn-around time, increasing our punctuality (which reached 87.5% in 2010 and 87% in 2011) and lowering fuel consumption. As of December 31, 2011, we operated 100% of our ASKs with our Airbus A320-Family Aircraft fleet.

According to JAC data, the Chilean domestic market as a whole transported approximately 8.3 million passengers in 2012, an increase of 19% from 7.0 million passengers transported in 2011 and it had an increase of 17.6% in terms of passengers from 5.9 million in 2010.2011. Our domestic passenger market share in Chile was 76.4% for 2011.76% in 2012, consistent with our market share in 2011, as measured in number of passengers transported. During 2011,2012, our main competitors in the domestic market were Sky Airlines and PAL Airlines, which began operations in June 2009. Sky Airlines currently operates a fleet of 13 Boeing 737-200 aircraft and flies to 12 destinations. PAL Airlines currently operates a fleet of 5 Boeing 737-200 aircraft and flies to 4 destinations.

There are currently no foreign airlines participating in the Chilean domestic market. Chile permits foreign airlines to operate in Chile. Additionally, there are no regulatory barriers that prevent a foreign airline from creating a Chilean subsidiary and entering the Chilean domestic market using that subsidiary.

Operations within Peru

LanLAN Peru started operations in 1999 with both domestic and international flights from Lima. During the pastlast ten years LanLAN Peru has expanded consistently, consolidating its domestic operations and coverage of the relevant markets with a continuous focus on improving our excellence for service. LAN Peru has over 113 domestic daily arrivals and departures. Self-check-in levels have grown steadily in recent years, reaching 80% for domestic routes in 2012.

Regarding the domestic market, Peru has tremendous potential, compared to other Latin American markets, based on per capita travel ratios. In 20112012, the domestic market in Peru reached 5.96.3 million passengers and 6.37.6 million passengers are expected for 2012.2013. LAN Peru expects to increase connections between cities within the country. Cusco, the country’s most important tourist destination, accounts for most of LAN Peru’s domestic operations and is served by 17 flights each day. LAN Peru flies at least three times daily to each of its 13 destinations except Tumbes, Pucallpa, Puerto Maldonado and Tacna (2 or 3 flights daily).

Lan

LAN Peru has one of the most modern fleets in Latin America operatingthat included 22 Airbus A319 aircraft withduring 2012, 14 of them for domestic operations and 8 for regional operations. This fleet is ideal for the characteristics of Peruvian routes, as it maximizes available payload in high-altitude airports. In terms of efficiency, a uniform fleet also allows for low maintenance costs, high crew productivity and operational flexibility.

Fleet utilization increased from 10.1 flight hours per operating day in 2011 to 10.6 flight hours per operating day in 2012.

Compared to 2010, LanIn 2012, a total of 4.5 million passengers traveled on LAN Peru’s domestic operations in Peru showedroutes, which represented an expansionincrease of 3%14% compared to 2011 domestic passenger traffic (as measured in RPKs) during 2011, despite the aggressive plans from competitors.. According to data provided by the Peruvian DGAC, our domestic market share in Peru was 62% for 2007, 73% for 2008, 80% for 2009, 70% for 2010 andin 2012, compared to a 64% formarket share in 2011, as measured in number of passengers.

A total of 3.9 million passengers traveled on Lan Peru’s domestic Peruvian routes Our main competitors in 2011, which represented an increase of 3% compared to 2010. As of February 29, 2012, competitors included Peruvian Airlines,Peru include TACA (which began new flights to Arequipa in August 2011 and Puerto Maldonado and restarted flights to Juliaca in January 2012 in addition to its existing frequencies to Cusco, Juliaca, Tarapoto and Trujillo)2012), Star Peru (which has focused in its passenger operations in the east of the country and in its charter corporate business), LCPeru (which is a small airline previously known as LC BUSRE).

Lan Perustarted operations to Cuzco on April 2012) and Peruvian Airlines (which acquired 6 new aircraft during 2012 and expects to increase the connections between cities within the country. Cusco, the country’s most important tourist destination, accounts for most of Lan Peru’s domesticstart regional operations and is served by 17 flights each day. Lan Peru flies at least three times daily to each of its 13 destinations from Lima with Tumbes as an exception (2 flights daily).

Regarding airport services, Lan Peru has over 103 domestic daily arrivals and departures. Self-check levels have grown steadily in the past years, reaching 79% for domestic routes at the end of 2011.2013).

Operations within Argentina

LanSince 2005, LAN Argentina initiated services in June 2005, covering two Argentine domestic destinations from Buenos Aires, Cordoba and Mendoza. Between 2005 and 2007, Lan Argentinahas increased the number of Argentineits domestic destinations to nine addinga total of 14 Argentine cities, and now serves Bahia Blanca, Bariloche, Iguazu,Buenos Aires, Calafate, Comodoro Rivadavia, Cordoba, Iguazu, Mendoza, Neuquen, Rio Gallegos, Ushuaia, CalafateSalta, San Juan, Tucuman and Salta. In June 2008, LanUshuaia.

Since the end of 2006, LAN Argentina initiated services to Neuquen and in September 2008 to San Juan. In April 2009, Lan Argentina initiated services to Tucuman.

From June to November 2006, Lan Argentina replaced its Boeing B737-200 fleet, which consisted of five aircraft, four of which werehas operated Airbus A320 aircraft. We use these aircraft in both domestic and regional operations. The replacement of these aircraft enabled LanLAN Argentina to increase the scope, size and efficiency of its operations. By the end of December 2011, we operatedcurrently operates a fleet of nine10 Airbus A320 aircraft in our domestic operations.

In the domestic Argentine market, LanLAN Argentina operates in a regulated environment in which fares sold to Argentine passengers are subject to minimum and maximum prices that vary per route. In August 2006, by presidential decree, both the floor and ceiling of the regulated price range were increased by 20%. The decree also liberalized foreign ownership of Argentinean airlines, previously capped at 49%. Since this decree, the floor and ceiling of the regulated price range have been consistently increased as follows:on an annual or semi-annual basis, by a range of 8-18%. In 2012, the ceiling increased in a higher proportion than the floor, resulting in a wider spread of rates available to generate revenue, increasing by 18% (floor) and 40% (ceiling) in April 2008,February 2012; by 18% in May 2008, by10% (floor) and 20% in 2009, by 15%(ceiling) in June 20102012, and by 10% (floor) and 20% (ceiling) in November 2010.2012.

Our domestic market share in Argentina, basedBased on our internal estimates as of December 31, 2011 amounted2012, our domestic market share in Argentina was approximately 33%. During this period of time LAN Argentina transported 2.4 million passengers, an increase of 25% compared to 30%. Our2011. The competitors in the Argentinean market during 20112012 were Aerolíneas ArgentinasneasArgentinas and its affiliate Austral Líneas AéneasAéreas. Together, these two companies held substantiallycomprise the entiresubstantial majority of the remaining domestic Argentine market share, although a small portion of the domestic Argentine market.market share is serviced through Sol and Andes.

Operations within Ecuador

At the end of 2008, the Civil Aviation National Board authorized usLAN Ecuador to operate domestic flights in Ecuador. InEcuador and in April 2009, weLAN Ecuador initiated the operationsservice between Quito and Guayaquil.

In December 2009,the past three years, LAN Ecuador has greatly expanded the number of destinations and frequency of flights in Ecuador. As of the end of 2012, LAN Ecuador operated 4967 weekly flights between Quito and Guayaquil, one of Latin America’s major routes. In September 2010, the Company started daily flights to the Galapagos Islands. In November 2011, LAN Ecuador added two more7 weekly flights to the airport ofBaltra, 2 weekly flights to San Cristobal in the Galapagos Islands. As of February 29, 2012, LAN Ecuador operated 63and 15 weekly flights between Quito and Guayaquil. The Company also began daily flights between Cuenca and Quito.

In 2011,2012, LAN Ecuador transported 1.01.2 million passengers in the domestic passenger market, achieving a load factor of 77% with a growth78.5% and representing an increase of 63%20% in number of passengers with respectserviced over 2011. LAN Ecuador had a domestic market share of 31.76% in 2012, representing a significant increase over its 2011 market share, according to 2010 and a national market of 25.6%.internal estimates.

In Ecuador, the company’s principal competitors are TAME, Aerogal and Icaro.

Operations within Colombia

On November 26,Following the acquisition of LAN Colombia in 2010, LAN acquired Colombian airline Aires (rebranded as Lan Colombia in 2011), for US$12 million in cash, in addition to assuming net liabilities of US$87 million. The Colombian market is the second largest market in South America with over 14 million annual domestic passengers and represents a key market in LAN’s consolidation as a leading airline within the region.

At the time of the acquisition, Lan Colombia was the second largest operator in Colombia’s domestic market with approximately 20% of the market share as of December 31, 2010. This predominant position has been maintained by Lan Colombia, by holding 19.1% of the domestic market share as of December 31, 2011 (based on the Company’s internal estimations). Lan Colombia operates 22 domestic destinations. Nowadays, Lan Colombia’s fleet consisted of 9 B737-700s, 3 Airbus A 320, 10 Q200 and 4 Q400, all of which are operating leases.

LAN’s strategy through this acquisition isintends to replicate LAN’sits “low cost” model, already operating in the other affiliates domestic markets of Chile, Peru, Argentina Chile,and Ecuador, and Peru, stimulatingto stimulate demand on domestic flights by providing more Colombian citizens the opportunity to use air transportation. LAN Colombia operates 20 domestic destinations.

During 20112012, LAN Colombia successfully implemented its strategy of demand stimulation, achieving fare reductions of approximately 35% and advanced purchases of 14 to 21 days prior to departure depending on the Companymarket. This demand stimulation strategy was focused on ensuringaccompanied by a new marketing plan aiming to increase brand awareness. Additionally we continued to increase our penetration of the corporate segment with new corporate contracts with the main companies that the safety, on time performance and service quality standardstravel within Colombia. LAN Colombia launched LAN Corporate, our corporate fidelity program together with a new scheme of its new affiliate were consistent with LAN’s own high standards. To this end, Lan Colombia was successfully certified by IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA)commissions for travel agencies in November 2011.

In December 2011, the Companyorder to further develop these relationships. It also launched the LANPASS co-branding alliance with a local group of banks in order to increase benefits of our frequent flyer program, gain more members and compete with Aviancas’ Lifemiles program.

LAN brandColombia also intends to advance its strategy of fleet optimization with the return and purchase of ten aircraft, which will be replaced with the modern Airbus A320-Family aircraft. We successfully phased out three B737s in 2012 and are in process of returning four Dash 8-Q400 and purchasing two Dash 8-200 aircraft. We also launched the phase out of our six A320s with new A320s that have one more row of seats together with new Recaro seats that maintain pitch and travel experience. All these actions aim to further reduce our operating expenses and become the most efficient carrier in Colombia. The LAN Colombia fleet currently consists of six Boeing 737-700s, five Airbus A320s, four Bombardier Dash 8-Q400s (grounded since June 2012) and ten Bombardier Dash 8-200s.

We also launched a cost reduction initiative, named OSCAR, with a significant stepcost saving goal which is expected to be captured during 2013. This cost reduction initiative promotes the participation of employees within the organization to identify cost saving ideas. Selected initiatives have been included in each area’s budget for 2013. Additionally, the successful turnaroundmaintenance department implemented the MXI system, in order to standardize LAN Colombia’s operation with the rest of LATAM’s domestic operations. The MXI system increases adherence of maintenance programs and improves aircraft interchange within LATAM, by centralizing all aircraft data.

The domestic Colombian industry transported almost 16.5 million passengers during 2012, a 17% increase over 2011. LAN Colombia has maintained its position as the second largest operator in Colombia’s domestic market with approximately 19.4% of the Colombian domestic passenger operations. During 2011 the Company recognized US$52 million operating loss from its Colombian passenger operations. This loss includes significant costs related to the rebranding process, marketing initiatives aimed at integrating Colombia into LAN’s regional network, migrationmarket share as of Lan Colombia to LAN’s IT systems, the early termination of contracts with third party suppliers.

December 31, 2012. A total of 33.2 million passengers traveled on LanLAN Colombia domestic routes in 2011,2012, which represented an increase of 12%13% compared to 2010.2011 domestic passenger activity. LAN Colombia’s main competitor, Avianca, carried almost 10 million passengers in 2012 and had a market share in 2012 of approximately 59%. VivaColombia, a low cost carrier that started operations within Colombia in June 2012, transported more than 550,000 passengers for the 2012 year, reaching a 3% market share. VivaColombia is based in Medellin, operates five A320s with 180 seats and competes with LAN Colombia in only three out of 14 routes.

As we look ahead to 2013, LAN Colombia will continue to market the LAN brand in the domestic Colombian market, maintain excellence in service, leadership in punctuality and corporate segment penetration.

Operations within Brazil

TAM Linhas Aereas, is the leading domestic passenger airline in Brazil, and has operated domestic flights in Brazil since the Company’s creation in 1961. As of February 28, 2013, TAM Linhas Aereas have flights to 42 destinations within Brazil as well as some seasonal destinations. The strategy is based on providing strong connectivity through a network based on the main Brazilian cities, offering a reliable and high quality service, and leveraging our strong brand position in Brazil and abroad. TAM Linhas Aereas evaluates our network of domestic routes on an ongoing basis in order to achieve optimal operational efficiency and profitability.

The domestic market in Brazil has historically suffered from overcapacity, which resulted in very low load factors compared to industry standards, which has negatively impacted the financial results of domestic airlines in recent years. However, this trend has begun to change during 2012, as major airlines have reduced domestic capacity, which is expected to continue during 2013. LATAM has made significant progress in the turnaround of the domestic Brazil passenger operation following the combination of LAN and TAM, improving profitability by increasing load factor through the rationalization of capacity and improved revenue management through better segmentation of the market. From June 2012 to the end of the year, TAM reduced its capacity by 3.0% as measured in ASKs, which coupled with an 11.7% increase in traffic, lead to an increase of 10.3 percentage points in load factors on a year-over-year basis. As of January 2013, we operate an average fleet of 109 aircraft in the Brazilian domestic market. During 2013, we expect to further benefit fromreduce our capacity by 5% to 7% in order to improve the turnaround process that took place during 2011. By continuing the improvementprofitability of Lan Colombia’s standards and by working along with travel agencies in Colombia, we aim to approach the Colombian corporate segment. Furthermore, we expect to phase out during 2012 the first 3 Boeing 737-700s passenger aircraft operated by Lan Colombia and replace them with LAN’s Airbus A320s. Through these initiatives, and by consolidating LAN’s presence in Colombia, we expect to reach break-even for our Colombiandomestic passenger operations byin Brazil. TAM utilized the greater efficiency of the Airbus A320-Family aircraft on short-haul flights in order to gain operational efficiencies, such as more efficient fuel consumption. We also operated our Airbus A330 and Boeing 767 aircraft on passenger flights, where these aircraft have higher potential also to carry cargo on such passenger flights.

According to our estimates, the Brazilian domestic market as a whole transported approximately 92.2 million passengers in 2012, an increase of 10.1% in terms of passengers from 83.8 million in 2011. TAM Linhas Aereas domestic passenger market share in Brazil as of the end of 2012.

Nowadays, Lan Colombia has seven weekly frequencies to Miami, being that its only international destination. In the medium term, Lan Colombia will evaluateyear was 40.8% as measured in RPKs. During 2012, TAM’s main competitors in the expansiondomestic market were GOL, the merged airlines Trip and Azul, and Avianca Brazil. GOL (including Webjet) ended 2012 with a domestic passenger market share of international passenger operations38.7% while Trip-Azul and the advantagesAvianca Brazil had market shares of any synergies it may obtain from LAN Cargo’s affiliate in Colombia, Lanco, launched in March 2009.14.5% and 5.4% respectively.

Passenger Alliances and Commercial Agreements

The following are our passenger alliances and partnerships as of February 29, 2012:March 11, 2013:

 

  

oneworld®oneworld®. In June 2000, Lan AirlinesLAN and LanLAN Peru were officially incorporated into the oneworld®oneworld® alliance. LanLAN Ecuador and LanLAN Argentina joined the alliance during 2007. Nowadays, oneworld®In March 2013, LATAM Airlines Group choseoneworld® as the global alliance for all of its airlines. As a result of this decision, TAM Airlines and LAN Colombia will become a member ofoneworld®. LAN Colombia expects to join the alliance during the fourth quarter 2013 and TAM Airlines (and its affiliate TAM Mercosur) will join during the second quarter 2014. TAM Airlines was previously a member of the Star Alliance®. Currently,oneworld® is a global marketing alliance consisting of Lan Airlines, LanLAN, LAN Peru, LanLAN Argentina, LanLAN Ecuador, Air Berlin, American Airlines, British Airways, Cathay Pacific Airlines, Qantas,Finnair, Iberia, Finnair, Japan Airlines, Malaysia Airlines, Qantas, Royal Jordanian and S7. It is expected that Qatar Airways join the alliance during 2013 and SriLankan Airlines will join during 2014. American Airlines and US Airways have announced plans to come together to create a new merged company, American Airlines, with continued membership in theoneworld® alliance. Together, thesethe current members of theoneworld® alliance, including LATAM, plus the other airlines are ablelisted above that have committed to offer a truly global network for business and leisure travellersjoin the alliance, will serve more than 950 airports across 160 countries, operating 13,000 daily departures

 

flyingStar Alliance®. In May 2010, TAM was officially incorporated into Star Alliance. Currently, Star Alliance® comprises TAM Airlines (and its affiliate TAM Mercosur), Adria Airways, Aegean Airlines, Air Canada, Air China, Air New Zealand, ANA, Asiana Airlines, Austrian, Avianca, Taca Airlines, Brussels Airlines, Copa Airlines, Croatia Airlines, Egyptair, Ethiopian Airlines, Lot Polish Airlines, Lufthansa, Scandinavian Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Singapore Airlines, South African Airways, Swiss, Tap Portugal, Thai, Turkish Airlines, United and US Airways. Together, they offer convenient and comfortable travel to more than 750 destinationsalmost any destination in nearly 150 countries, schedule flexibilitythe world, reaching 1,329 airports in 194 countries. Following the combination of LAN and reciprocal frequent flyer program benefits. During 2012 it is expected that Kingfisher, Air BerlinTAM; TAM will withdraw from the Star Alliance during the second quarter of 2014, and Malaysian Airlines will join the alliance.oneworld® Alliance.

 

  

American Airlines. Since 1997, Lan AirlinesLAN has had an agreement with American Airlines, which enables Lan AirlinesLAN and American Airlines to share carrier codes for certain flights on global reservations systems, thereby

enabling American Airlines passengers to purchase seats on Lan AirlinesLAN flights and vice-versa.vice-versa (a “code-sharing agreement”). The Department of Transportation, or DOT, granted immunity from antitrust immunity to our arrangement with American Airlinesregulations in October 1999. The antitrust immunity encompasses cooperation in commercial and operational1999, for specific areas such as pricing, scheduling, joint marketing efforts and reductions of airport and purchasing costs, as well as further implementation of cargo synergies in areas such as handling and other airport services.cooperation. For more information see “—Regulation—U.S. Aeronautical Regulation—Certain Regulatory United States of America—Authorizations in Connection with Strategic Alliances”and Licenses” below. Through this alliance, we currently offer service to thirty additional destinations in the United States and Canada. In 2005, the DOT granted also antitrust immunity to a similar agreement between Lan Peru and American Airlines. This antitrust immunity allows enhanced coordination between LanLAN Peru and American Airlines, for specific areas of cooperation. In accordance with the terms of the DOT’s 2005 approval, LAN, LAN Peru and both companiesAmerican Airlines resubmitted their alliance agreement to the DOT for review in October 2010. LAN Peru and American Airlines established in 2007 code-share operations between Peru and the U.S. with additional destinations in both countries. In the same year, LanLAN Argentina and American Airlines signed a codesharecode-share agreement expanding the cooperation between the companies and at the end of 2011 a codesharecode-share agreement between LanLAN Ecuador and American Airlines was signed, which allows to offer the American Airlines network in the U.S to all LAN passengers. At the end of 2012 two new code-share agreements were signed between American Airlines and the LATAM Airlines Group; one between LAN Colombia and American Airlines and the other between TAM and American Airlines. These new code-share relationships will provide expanded opportunities for American Airlines to serve new markets in Brazil and Colombia and for TAM Airlines and LAN Colombia in the United States.

 

  

Iberia. In January 2001, Lan AirlinesLAN initiated a code-share agreement with Iberia, pursuant to which we offer passengers between ten and fourteen non-stop frequencies per week between Santiago and Madrid. In subsequent years, other destinations were added to the agreement, such as Alicante, Amsterdam, Barcelona, Bilbao, Brussels, London (Heathrow), Malaga, Milan, Paris, Rome and Zurich. In 2007, LanLAN Ecuador and LanLAN Peru set up code-share agreements with Iberia for routes between Ecuador, Peru and Spain; as well as four additional European destinations with LanLAN Peru and seven destinations with LanLAN Ecuador. Nowadays, Lan Airlines, LanAs of March 11, 2013, LAN, LAN Ecuador and LanLAN Peru offer around 17, 11 and 14 destinations in Europe, respectively.respectively, through Iberia routes

 

  

Qantas. In July 2002, Lan AirlinesLAN initiated a code-share agreement with Qantas to operate between Santiago, Chile and Sydney, Australia with a stopover in Auckland, New Zealand. As of February 29, 2011,March 11, 2013, this code-share agreement includes daily6 Santiago-Auckland-Sydney flights operated by Lan Airlines. On March 26, 2012, Qantas will start operatingLAN and 3 non-stop Santiago-Sydney frequenciesflights offered by means of a code-share agreement entered into with Lan Airlines.Qantas.

 

  

British Airways. In 2007, Lan AirlinesLAN initiated a code-share agreement with British Airways on Lan AirlinesLAN flights between Sao Paulo and Santiago to provide service for British Airways passengers traveling from London to Santiago through a connection in Sao Paulo. This code-share agreement also includes British Airways’ flights between Madrid and London.

 

  

Lufthansa and Swiss Air: TAM has a code-share agreement with Lufthansa and Swiss, pursuant to which TAM offers its customers long haul flights from Brazil to Germany, inside Germany to 7 destinations and within Europe to 6 destinations operated by Lufthansa and Swiss Air. Lufthansa and Swiss Air likewise offer customers seats on TAM’s flights from Brazil to Germany, inside Brazil to 11 destinations and within South America to 3 destinations.

Aeromexico. In 2004, weLAN expanded ourits previous alliance with Aeromexico. The newAeromexico and the current code-sharing agreement includes all of our passenger airlines. Under this alliance, we code-share in flights to Mexico from Chile and Peru, as well as to 18 domestic destinations in Mexico. Additionally, itour code-sharing agreement provides our passengers with benefits such as easier connections and reciprocal accrual and redemption of frequent flyer program rewards. In May 2012, TAM also implemented a code-share agreement with Aeromexico between Sao Paulo and Mexico City. This code-share agreement also includes 9 destinations in Brazil, and 9 destinations in México.

 

  

TAMAll Nippon Airways. In 2007, Lan Airlines and Lan Peru, established regional code-share agreements withOctober 2010, TAM Linhas Aéreas. Through this agreement, LAN offers fourteen additional destinations in Brazil. LAN also code shares with Transportes Aéreos del Mercosur S.A. (“TAM Mercosur”) with respect to flights from Santiago to Asunción, Paraguay, that are operated by TAM Mercosur. These arrangements provide our passengers with reciprocal accrual and redemption of frequent flyer program rewards. In 2008, Lan Argentina establishedLinheas Aereas initiated a code-share agreement with TAM from Buenos AiresAll Nippon Airways to operate between Sao Paulo and vice versa, which includes eight domestic destinationsNarita, through connections in Argentina and twelve domestic destinations in Brazil.London.

  

Cathay Pacific. In May 2010, Lan AirlinesLAN initiated a code-share agreement with Cathay Pacific to operate between Santiago and Hong Kong, through connections in Los Angeles, New York and Auckland, and in November 2010, LanLAN Peru initiated a code-share agreement with Cathay Pacific to operate between Lima and Hong Kong, through connections in Los Angeles and San Francisco.

  

Japan Airlines. In September 2011, Lan AirlinesLAN initiated a code-share agreement with Japan Airlines to operate between Santiago and Narita, through connections in Los Angeles and New York. Nowadays,LAN Peru and Japan Airlines is currently code sharing with LANhave recently also initiated a similar code-share agreement to provide services for JAL passengers travelling fromoperate between Lima and Narita to Santiago. We arethrough connections in the process of obtaining the approvals required by Japanese authorities in order to start code sharing with Japan AirlinesLos Angeles and be able to provide services for LAN passengers travelling from Santiago to Narita. We expect to obtain such approvals during the second quarter of 2012.New York.

 

  

Jetstar AirwaysAir Canada. In November 2010, LAN signedSince 2008, TAM has had an Interline Agreementagreement with Air Canada, which allows TAM to offer its customers flights between Sao Paulo and a Special Prorate Agreement (to sell Jetstar Airways flights) with Jetstar AirwaysToronto and other 7 domestic destinations in order to broaden theCanada operated by Air Canada, and Air Canada can codeshare on TAM flights between Sao Paulo and 7 destinations offered to LAN’s customers, particularly in the domestic markets of New Zealand, Australia, and South East Asia.Brazil.

 

  

JetBlue.US Airways During March 2011, LAN. In April 2010, TAM initiated a code-share agreement with US Airways to code-share between Brazil and USA. Through this agreement, US Airways offers 17 destinations from Rio de Janeiro to interior Brazil and two trunk routes from Miami to Sao Paulo and Manaus, while TAM can access to 23 domestic cities in USA from Orlando, Miami and New York.

United Airlines: In October 2007, TAM signed an Interline Agreementa code-share agreement with United which allows TAM to offer flights operated by United from points within the US, via the US, and intermediate points to a point or points in and beyond Brazil, to its customers. The code-share agreement also allows United to access flights operated by TAM from points within Brazil, via Brazil, and intermediate points to a point or points in and beyond Brazil.

Continental Airlines: In February 2010, TAM initiated a code-share agreement with Continental to code-share between Houston and Sao Paulo, Rio do Janeiro, Orlando and Miami, also to codeshare between Cleveland to Orlando and Miami. Continental is permitted access to 6 TAM trunks and 13 domestic cities in Brazil from Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo. Currently, while TAM has two different code-share agreements with United and Continental, which merged in 2010, the fees payable under both code-sharing agreements are subject to only one Special Prorate Agreement (to sell JetBlue flights) with JetBlue increasing the connection opportunities between New York and Boston, Washington, Chicago, Pittsburgh and many other US cities through JetBlue’s hub in the John F. Kennedy Airport in New York.Prorrate Agreement.

 

  

Other alliances and partnerships: Since 2005, we have hadTAM also has a code-share agreement in place with Air China to operate between Sao Paulo and Beijing, through connections in Madrid. LAN has a code-share agreement with Korean Air. Under this agreement we place our code on Korean Air, for flights between Los Angeles and Seoul while(operated by Korean Air places its code on our flights fromAir) and between Los Angeles to Santiago. Since 1999, Lan Airlines has been inand Santiago (operated by LAN), and an alliance with Alaska Airlines, which permits us to provide customers with service between Chile and three destinations in the west coast of the U.S. and Canada. Reciprocal accrual and redemption of frequent flyer program rewards is also available for LAN customers flying on Alaska Airlines flights and vice versa.

Passenger Marketing and Sales

Even though we market our servicesFollowing the business combination, LATAM will continue to operate under two brands, LAN and TAM.

LAN’s Passenger Marketing and Sales

Within the common “LAN” brand, we differentiate our marketing strategies between our long-haulinternational (long-haul) and short-hauldomestic (short-haul) services.

Our long-haul marketing strategy emphasizes attributes valued by our international customers, including reliability, high quality on-board and ground service, comfort, comprehensive coverage of key South American markets and frequent service to major overseas gateways such as New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Miami, Madrid and Sydney. In order to strengthen our market position, we have continued improving our passenger cabins and service and constantly monitor our corporate image. As such, in December 2008 andIn May 2009 we completed a retrofit program for our Boeing 767-300 and for our Airbus A340-300 fleet respectively, merging the Businessto upgrade and First Classes cabins intoimprove our long-haul fleet. See “—International Passenger Operations” for a Premium Business Class featuring full-flat seats, new entertainment units for both Premium Business and Economy cabins, together with a new on-board service. We invested US$124 million in this retrofit program for alldescription of recent improvements to our long haul passenger aircraft, which aims to give our passengers a sense of a “shorter” and more pleasant flight. For our Business passengers, our cabin features an on-board service aimed at providing the passenger with more time to rest, and for our Economy Class passengers, our upgraded entertainment units aim to make the flight a more enjoyable one. In October 2010 LAN decided to renew the seat configuration of its Boeing 767-300, which included improvements that increased the capacity of each airplane from 221 to 238 seats. The original configuration had 191 seats in the Economy cabin and 30 seats in the Premium Business cabin. The new seat configuration increases the number of seats in the Economy cabin to 220 and decreases the number of seats in the Premium Business cabin to 18. This seat configuration will be used in those markets with a higher tourism demand and/or lower corporate travel demand. This strategy allows us to obtain higher revenues and a more efficient cost management

Our long-haul fleet plan includes the incorporation of the 32 new Boeing 787 in the second half of 2012. LAN will be the first airline in Latin America, and one of the first in the world, to receive this model whose latest-generation technology and cabin innovations represent a revolution in the airline industry. Passengers will experience the Boeing 787’s advantages in the form of higher cabin humidity and increased comfort. The acquisition of these Boeing 787s will allow us to reach new destinations and boost LAN’s existing services while also continuing to increase the efficiency of our operations and reduce our carbon footprint.international fleet.

Our short-haul operations are designed to better match the customers’ needs in those routes, which are punctuality, reliability, higher frequencies, modern aircraft and efficient operations.

As such, these routes now feature modern planes, with leather seats, increased frequencies with more point-to-point flights, improved punctuality and streamlined processes including Internet sales, web check-in and airport self-check-in. We completedAll of the phase-out of our Boeing B737-200 fleet in 2008 and replaced it with modern Airbus Family Aircraft such as A320, A319 and A318. Nowadays, all our domestic operations (which include(Chile, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Ecuador and Colombia) followhave the same business model which aimsseeks to make air travel accessible to more people through low fares supported by a low-cost operation based on the efficient use of our resources.

Our short-haul fleet is also growing and will continue being renewed during the next six years with the acquisition See “—Domestic Passenger Operations” for a description of 89 additional Airbus 320 family aircraft. These aircraft have the latest security standards in the industry, as well as improvements in the interior cabin design and new seat technology. They are 13.0% percent lighter than the current models sold by Airbus, and therefore they allow lower fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. These aircraft are also are more comfortable for passengers since they have leather seats with integrated foam and more in-flight entertainment screens. In addition to this, the upper bins include mirrors that ensure visibility of carry-on luggage among other improvements of interior design. All changes in these aircraft were designedrecent initiatives to improve our domestic fleet, including the travel experience forintroduction of modern Airbus A320-Family Aircraft in most of our passengers on domestic and regional flights.

On November 26, 2010, LAN acquired Aires (rebranded as Lan Colombia in 2011), a Colombian carrier, which holds an average of 19.0% of the domestic market share as of December 31, 2011. This important addition to the LAN group made it possible for LAN to start operating within Colombia, adding 22 domestic destinations to the already existing international operation.operations.

We are constantly focused on delivering the services and flight items valued by customers in order to maintain high levels of customer satisfaction and we continuously monitor our customers’ preferences through surveys and perception studies. As a result,In response to comments received from our business travelers, in November 2007 we created the new Premium Economy class on some regional routes in response to comments made by our business travelers.routes. The Premium Economy program grants our customers preferential check-in and boarding, access to our VIP lounges, priority baggage claim, exclusive cabins with only twelve passengers, and personalized attention by our cabin attendants, among other benefits.

As mentioned above, we have been implementing a new business model in all our domestic operations (which include Argentina, Chile, Peru, Ecuador and Colombia) that seeks to make air travel accessible to more people through low fares supported by a low-cost operation based on the efficient use of our resources. During 2011 LAN received several awards solidifying the Company’s market position. These awards included Airline of the Year 2010 (AirFinance Journal) and Best E-commerce Website 2010 (E-commerce LATAM).

Branding

In March 2004, we launched our newThe “LAN” brand to bringwas launched in 2004 and brings together, under one strong international name, all our localof the affiliate brands such as “LAN Chile,” “LAN Peru,” “LAN Argentina” “LAN Colombia” and “LAN Ecuador.” We developed our newthe LAN brand and corporate image after an extensive process supported by a leading global branding agency.

Our corporate image is based on two core concepts: reliability and warmth, which support our promise of the best travel experience to, from and within South America. We are also committed to offer our customers with the best coverage to, from and within South America, and to promote sustainable tourism, helping develop the regions where we operate.

During 2005 and 2006, we focused on advancing the transition to our newthe LAN brand image. This included the gradual repainting of our fleet, which was completed in the second quarter of 2006. Our commercial strategy, centered on exploiting the LAN alliance concept, has been widely recognized, as exemplified by Airline Business magazine’s recognition of us in 2004 with its “Airline Strategy Award, Marketing.”

Using a single brand enabled our customers to better understand the common service and operating standards among our airlines, and our new image improved our visibility, which enhanced flexibility and increased the efficiency of our marketing efforts. It also provided a platform for the strategic use in mature markets of the following three powerful sub-brands, all relatedconnected to the LAN root:

the www.lan.com website for the convenience of our web booking engine and services platform;

LANPASS for our frequent flyer program; and

LANTOURS, a sub-brand through which we offer travel packages, hotels and other ancillary products, as well as promote tourism activities to and from the regions in which we operate. LANTOURS took hold first in Chile and is gradually being introduced into other key markets.

In December of 2011, we successfully finished the rebranding process of Aires as LAN, which required the painting of around 70.0% of its fleet; changing the image of all its sales offices and personnel to LAN; and most importantly, transforming Aires’ service to comply with LAN standards, thus fully incorporating Colombia’s operation to our current brand architecture.brand.

Our regular brand tracking and marketing effectiveness measurements show outstanding results in brand consistency and recognition, improving year after year, with marketing investments managed at healthilyhealthy and stable rates. As the corporate values behind our umbrella brand encompass attributes applicable to both operations, long haul and short haul, a single brand strategy has resulted in significant savings, as we only have to promote one master brand, thereby increasing the efficiency of our marketing efforts.

Distribution Channels

We use direct and indirect distribution channels. In the past few years, we have focused on streamlining our distribution strategy in order to reduce costs and enhance the effectiveness of our commercial efforts. This effort has resulted in efficiency gains, and we believe it should lead to further benefits in the future.

Travel agents conduct indirect sales that accounted for approximately 43.0%41% of passengers during 2011.2012. We paid these travel agents standard commissions ranging from 0% to 7.0%7% depending on the market and the ticket region type (domestic / international). Consistent with our efforts to reduce commission costs and in line with current market practices, in recent years we have reduced standard commissions in several markets. However, we are now charging a fee to customers for sales done through our own ticket offices or call centers in most countries, leaving the Internet as the only free-of-charge distribution channel.

Travel agents obtain airline travel information and issue airline tickets through Global Distribution Systems, or GDSs, that enable them to make reservations on flights from a large number of airlines. We participate actively in all major international GDSs, including Sabre, Amadeus, Galileo and Worldspan. In return for access to these systems, we pay transaction fees that are generally based on the number of reservations booked through each system. As part of its continued commitment to its passengers, in late 2009, LAN signed a series of agreements with Sabre, one of the major suppliers of IT solutions in the global airline industry. Through these agreements, Sabre will provideprovides the Company with the most advanced technology in reservation and distribution systems, optimization of routes and operational planning. TheLATAM recently completed the process of implementing the new system platforms comprises a periodin August of adjustment and migration that will last between two and three years until its full implementation. These agreements represent2012. This new systems platform represents a major step in terms of innovation by implementing the industry’s most advanced technology to streamline business and operational processes, involved in the service the Company provides to its customers. These agreements will serveand enabled us to provide itineraries that best fit the needs of passengers and to provide simpler, agile and efficient services in airports and in the sales and distribution channels, improving LAN’s services in each of the stages of the travel experience.

Direct channels refer to sales by our own ticket offices, contact-centers and website. In 2011,2012, direct bookings accounted for approximately 57.0%59% of all our passengers.

We have an extensive sales and marketing network in over thirty countries consisting of more than 155 domestic and international points-of-sale owned by us and approximately 45 general sales agents. We charge a fee to customers for sales completed through our own ticket offices or call centers in most countries, leaving the Internet as the only free-of-charge distribution channel.

Our contact-centers support the growth of our operations constituting a sales and a multi-service channel. During 2011, we continued to grow and develop new services to match the increasing expectations of our clients and the growth of our direct sales channels, in particular the www.lan.com website. Our main contact-center located in Santiago accounts for 781749 agents (of which 276246 are home-based) and 284212 agents in Lima. We complement our contact-center’s operations with third-party service providers that add approximately 6001050 agents who are located in Santiago, Lima and Buenos Aires. In total, all the centers handle more than 30,00037,500 calls/contacts per day, which mainly originate from the regions where we fly (South America, North America, Europe and Australasia) and cover fourfive languages (Spanish, English, Portuguese, French and German). We have continually upgraded our systems by incorporating technological advances to enhance efficiency and customer service.

Our website, www.lan.com, is an integral part of our commercial, marketing and service efforts. Together with other direct sales initiatives, our website provides us with an important tool to reduce our distribution costs. Our Internet-related sales have increased significantly in recent years, by 21.9% in 2009 compared to 2008, 22.0%22% in 2010 compared to 2009, 22.6% in 2011, and 22.6% 2011 compared to 2010,42% in 2012, which amounted to a total of US$796.41,097 million internet-related sales in 2011.2012. We are continually improving our website, a key element of our new short-haul model, so that the technological platform can support the expected future growth.

Besides serving as a sales channel, we have utilized our website as a tool to provide value-added services and enhance communications. We send weekly promotional e-mails to more than 4.87.2 million subscribers. Members of our frequent flyer program receive their monthly balances and other information by e-mail and can access the data and redeem awards through our website. We have an active online marketing program which brings visitors to the website from search engines and travel-related websites.

During 2009 we improved several services on the website. We introduced the flexible award redemption service, which enables LANPASS members to obtain flights with their kilometers at any time of year. We also updated our Flight Information System to ensure accurate, real time information. In addition, we continued to promote our web-based check-in service for domestic and international flights. This system allows those passengers who are not checking-in bags, to go directly to the gate, and the remaining checked-in passengers, to leave their bags at a special bag drop counter and proceed to the gate. In addition to web-based check-in, we have self-check kiosks in 1317 airports in Chile, seven14 airports in Peru, three15 airports in Argentina; threeArgentina, five airports in Ecuador and eight24 in Colombia. As

of December 31, 2011,2012, the kiosk and web check-in utilization rate increased to 83.0%was of 78% for domestic routes in Chile, 80.0%80% for domestic routes in Peru, 54.0%55% for domestic routes in Argentina, and 50.0%55% for domestic routes in Ecuador.Ecuador and 41% in Colombia. Also in 2010 we launched our LAN.com Mobile service, enabling our customers to check-in, verify their flight status and other itineraries using their internet-enabled mobile phones.

In 2010 LAN was recognized as the “Latin American E-commercee-commerce Company of the Year” by the Latin American e-Commerce Institute.Institute and in 2012 LAN was awarded with the “Best of the Web” price by the American company Compuware.

Electronic Ticketing

In 1997, we introduced electronic tickets, commonly referred to as e-tickets, and have since worked to increase their use. E-tickets are a key element of our sales efforts through the Internet and our call centers and they also produce important simplifications in our back-office, enabling us to significantly reduce distribution costs. Since 2008, the Company has reached a 100% penetration of e-ticketing on all LAN routes.

Also,routes and, during 2010 we completed the implementation of interline e-ticketing with all of ouroneworldoneworld® partners.

Advertising and Promotional Activities

Our advertisement and promotional efforts are aimed at enhancing our brand positioning and supporting specific aspects of our commercial efforts. These activities include the use of television, print, outdoors and radio advertisements as well as direct and online marketing.

During 2011,2012, our advertising campaigns wherewere mainly focused on continuing stimulating demand by implementing a pricing strategy that has made flying more accessible in ourthe domestic markets and within South America to those traveling especially for tourism. ToOn this end,regard, we are proud of having entered intoour partnerships with tour operators and tourism government agencies across the region (SERNATUR and “Chile es Tuyo” in Chile, PROMPERU in Peru, ProExport Colombia among others), which allowed us to reach new customers and to promote local and regional tourism in the markets where we operate. This is supported by the unique coverage and travel experience that we offer to those passengers traveling to, from and within South America.

We have also innovated our demand-generating advertising by promoting pre-low seasons special offers,season specials thus making our demand curves more stable and making it possible for us to offer to our customers all our destinations at very accessible prices throughout the year.

TAM’s Passenger Marketing and Sales

Within the “TAM” brand, TAM segregates its marketing strategies between domestic (short-haul) and international (long-haul).

Our long-haul strategy focuses on attributes valued by this type of clients, with a number of initiatives focusing on in-flight services, which is where passengers get most of their travel experience and where high quality and comfort are the key differentials. We also view TAM’s large network as a significant differential, since TAM is the Brazilian airline with the largest international operation, offering broad coverage in South America to Europe and the United States, as well as other international destinations through code-share agreements and alliances with other airlines.

To strengthen TAM positioning, we invest in improving our cabins and services, and constantly monitor our corporate image through quantitative and qualitative surveys.

For example, in 2008 TAM implemented a project to redesign the cabins of our wide-body and narrow-body aircraft using a London-based design agency with a long and successful track record in interior design for the aviation industry. The redesign uses key elements inspired by Brazil’s natural architecture and that of its homes. This “home from home” concept aims to provide passengers with a more relaxing and cozy travel experience.

The new design was officially launched in the market in 2012 with the arrival of four new B777-300 aircraft. The First Class and Coach Cabins feature the new design, as does the section designated “Espaço Mais” (“more leg room”). A new seating configuration that is currently under development will accompany the redesign in the Business Class cabin on TAM’s B77-300 aircraft.

TAM short-haul operations follow international standards and meet certain client needs specific to such shorter routes, which include point-to-point frequency and operating efficiency. TAM operates two cabins (Business and Coach), maintaining the service standard by type of aircraft (narrow and wide body). Moreover, these routes are invaluable for frequent fliers since they enable the use of TAM Fidelidade membership points with no seat restrictions.

In the domestic market, TAM key differentials are our high frequency, on-time flights and service in the cabin, and our constant pursuit of innovations and leadership in the sector. One example is the OnAir project, through which we offer the possibility of mobile phone usage and data transmission on board. We were the first in the Americas to offer this service.

TAM operates Airbus A319, A320 and A321 aircraft depending on demand and infrastructure restrictions. In 2010, we started the “brand elasticity” project, making air travel even more accessible through special fares for flights planned well in advance, with the focus on the tourism/leisure market, while continuing to service the important corporate market.

With this project, we achieved a high rate of migration from road to air transport and an increasingly higher number of passengers that were flying for the first time.

TAM constantly focuses on delivering services and items valued by consumers to maintain client satisfaction and retention levels high. For this, we conduct various perception studies (such as NPS, brand funnel) and segmentation studies (Conjoint) to monitor and roll out action plans. As a result, in 2012 we redesigned our domestic fare profiles, making them simple and transparent for passengers, while clearly highlighting the benefits of each profile and the upsell value between bundles. Thus, passengers interested only in price have the option of more attractive fares, while those seeking additional benefits such as TAM Fidelidade membership points, priority services (baggage, check-in and boarding) and baggage allowance may access these services through a fixed preset amount. Passengers know how much they pay for additional benefits.

TAM has also implemented projects to generate additional revenues, targeting items that passengers prioritize, such as more leg room (Espaço Mais) and pre-purchase of excess baggage, among others, offered through convenient online services.

As a recognition of some of these initiatives, in 2012 we received the Freddie Awards (which evaluate the best redemption ability among the loyalty programs of airline companies in the Americas) and the Skytrax awards in the ‘Best Airline in South America’ and ‘Best Airline Team in South America’ categories, and were recognized as the Most Admired Company in the Airline Industry by the Carta Capital magazine and as the Most Prestigious Company in Brazil by the Época magazine, among others.

Branding

In 2008, TAM launched the strategic platform for a single brand, with TAM being the main brand that, through values, strategic positioning and language, guides other brands, services and business units, such as TAM Airlines, TAM Cargo, TAM Viagens, TAM Fidelidade, TAM nas Nuvens and others. Thus, we generate synergies among our businesses, always guided by the same values and the commitment to quality and relationship with our stakeholders.

TAM is inspired by the vision that working with the spirit to serve makes people happier. This “spirit to serve” signifies always being ready to be useful and make everything work better, thus making people happier. It means to be sensitive to others and to their problems, to be available to seek solutions.

In line with this vision, our mission is to be the preferred airline of people, with joy, creativity, respect and responsibility.

Based on this strategic brand positioning, TAM seeks to offer accessibility to all of those who value an efficient, rewarding, safe and hassle-free experience. Whatever may be the need – whether business or leisure travel—we have created products and services that meet these needs.

Furthermore, in line with the brand strategy and the pursuit of synergies arising out of the combination of LAN and TAM, the brand positioning of the Cargo unit was redefined and the cargo operations of TAM Cargo and ABSA in Brazil will be consolidated, subject to government approval. In 2012 ABSA received the first freight aircraft identified by the brand and the colors of TAM Cargo in its fuselage.

Distribution Channels

TAM is constantly developing new sales channels to serve our clients, who can rely on the indirect sales channels, represented by travel agents and online travel agencies (OTA), as well as on the direct channel, through TAM.com, our call center, airport ticket offices (ATO), city ticket offices (CTO) and smart business.

TAM was the first airline in Latin America to sell tickets online. Through TAM’s website, www.tam.com.br, users can purchase tickets online by paying or using TAM Fidelidade membership points, make reservations up to one hour prior to departure and access information related to the TAM Fidelidade program and the services available.

In 2012, the indirect sales channels accounted for approximately 70% of total sales and 61% of tickets issued. One of our main challenges was to increase sales, which accounted for approximately 30% of total sales in the year. In terms of tickets issued, direct channels accounted for approximately 39% of all tickets, increasing substantially over the previous year.

TAM plans to increase segmented direct sales in the leisure market and to make the booking of tickets, especially over the Internet, easier for our passengers. In 2012, we consolidated the sale of seats with increased leg room (Espaço Mais) within TAM’s e-commerce sales process and through the call center, facilitating access to this service and increasing direct sales.

In 2012, TAM also launched a customized search system, which takes into account the client’s budget or the total points available in the TAM Fidelidade loyalty program and displays available flights accordingly. With “Price Search,” the company expects to facilitate search and increase the number of passengers, who can choose to pay in cash or through points. We are the first airline in Latin America to sell through a customized search system.

TAM’s call center is available 24 hours a day. We also sell tickets through our chain of stores located in the main cities of Brazil and in each airport where we operate. In addition, we significantly expanded the TAM Viagens store chain through franchises in the main cities across Brazil.

Advertising and Promotional Activities

Our promotional and communications efforts are aimed at strengthening the brand positioning and providing support to specific commercial needs. These activities include initiatives in communication channels such as television, press, billboards and radio, as well as direct and online marketing.

In 2012, our campaigns focused on stimulating demand by implementing a pricing strategy that made air travel more accessible in our domestic market and with destinations in South America, North America and Europe. Our strategy focused on different target groups and their specific characteristics, which enabled us to promote certain differentials such as on-time flights and a broad network for business travelers, and promotional prices for leisure travelers who can plan their trips in advance. These initiatives enabled us to retain our business clients, who have a higher average ticket, while increasing demand among leisure travelers, who can travel during off-peak seasons and plan their flights well in advance. With this, we successfully increased our load factors.

Frequent Flyer Program

OurDuring 2012, LATAM began to harmonize the LAN and TAM frequent flyerflyers programs. Each program currently operates under its own brand and regulations, however, during 2013, changes will be made to both programs in order to reduce key differences, and offer its members, similar features and benefits, including the creation of new tiers in both programs, harmonizing qualification criteria for top tiers, and creating new benefits in order to offer all members an enhanced value proposition, therefore stimulating preference and travel frequency with LAN and TAM, respectively.

LANPASS

LANPASS, LAN, frequent Flyer Program, is called LANPASS.a key element of the LAN’s marketing and loyalty strategy. The objective of LANPASS is to generatereward customer´s loyalty, and as a consequence, LAN PASS generates incremental revenue and customer retention through customer loyalty and targeted marketing.retention. Worldwide, as of February 29,December 30, 2012, LANPASS hashad approximately 5.86.4 million members.

CustomersLANPASS members earn LANPASS kilometers in their LANPASS accounts based on distance flown and class of ticket purchased, or by using services of other participantspartners in the LANPASS program. Based on an award schedule, customersCustomers can redeem kilometers for free tickets, upgrades or other products.products in an online catalogue. Under our current frequent flyer program, our passengers are grouped into one standard level and three different elite levels based on each passenger’s flying behavior. These different groups determine which benefits customers are eligible to receive, such as free upgrades on a space-available basis, VIP lounge access and preferred boarding and check-in.

AimingIn 2012 LANPASS significantly reduced the amount of kilometers required for ticket redemption in LAN’s main domestic markets, allowing members to increase redemption levelsachieve an award reward earlier and expand redemption alternatives, in 2011 LANPASS increased the number of price levels for the redemption of tickets from three up to 14 (allowing the increase of number of seats available for redemption of kilometers), in order to give a better availability and flexibility for the customers.faster than before. These new redemption price offersinitiative, together with the Flexible Redemption system launched in 2011, resulted in an increase of 28.0%22.0% in kilometers redeemed and 32.0%35.0% in award tickets redeemed by LANPASS’ members in 2011.2012.

LANPASS has highly rated partners, including other airlines, hotels, car rental agencies, retailers, and credit card issuers from the main financial institutions in Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina Uruguay, United States and, starting from 2012, also in Colombia.Colombia with Banco de Bogotá and Occidente both members of Grupo Aval. These partnerships give our customers the opportunity to accrueearn additional kilometers for using their services.

Through the incorporation of additional partners in 2011, LAN customers accrued 43.0% more kilometers than in 2010, by using other services different from the services offered by LAN and other airlines. In the banking segment, during 2010, LANPASS renewed its partnership with Santander Chile for another five years, spreading LANPASS accrual from credit/debit card to all retail banking offering. LANPASS also launched a new partnership with BBVA, a leading bank in Argentina, began to issue credit cards in the United States with U.S. Bank, and increased our offering in redemption catalogs in Brazil with Banco Itau.

In the non banking segment, LANPASS continues to leverage its member’s purchase behavior to partner with leading players in the markets and become the most attractive loyalty program in the home markets. In the past two years, LANPASS has entered into new industries, such as retail, supermarkets, automotive, real estate, drugstores and health care centers. As an active member of theoneworldoneworld® alliance, we have reciprocal frequent-flyer agreements with alloneworldoneworld® carriers. In addition to this, we have reciprocal agreements with other carriers, such as Alaska Airlines, Aeromexico and TAM. These agreements allow LANPASS members to accrue and redeem LANPASS kilometers ononeworld® flights. flights operated by these other carriers.

The LANPASS frequent flyer program aims to be the leading loyalty program in all of LAN’s home markets. In the past couple of years, we have implemented a number of marketing initiatives to increase customer’s engagement and activity with the program outside Chile.in all the markets. In 2011,2012, membership in LANPASS grew 32.0%continued growing at 20% in Peru 27.0%and Argentina, 25% in Ecuador, and 32.0%doubled its size in Argentina. Furthermore,Colombia.

TAM Fidelidade Program

TAM’s frequent flyer program, also called TAM Fidelidade, was the first loyalty program launched by a Brazilian airline and represents a key element in TAM’s marketing strategy. LATAM believes TAM Fidelidade is the most flexible in the market because it imposes no restrictions on flights or the number of seats available when members are redeeming accumulated points. TAM Fidelidade has more than 10 million members and approximately 24 million redeemed tickets have been distributed since its creation in 1993. Points earned by TAM Fidelidade members must be redeemed for tickets within two years.

TAM Fidelidade customers are classified in four different categories (white, blue, red and black) and qualification for a particular category is based on frequency of flights. The rate at which points accumulate varies depending on membership tier. The white card is the base level of membership and cardholders accrue points each time they fly. Blue and red cardholders receive progressively greater benefits and increased points for miles flown; allowing the holders to accrue redeemable points for free travel more quickly. We launched the black card in 2009 to create additional benefits and conveniences for our most frequent flyers, such as granting black cardholders access to a dedicated customer service group to help meet all of their needs.

As active current member of the Star Alliance, TAM has reciprocal frequent-flyer agreements with all alliance’s carriers, where TAM Fidelidade customers can accrue points and redeem flights on all alliance’s carriers flights. After TAM joins theoneworld® alliance in the second quarter of 2014, TAM Fidelidade customers will be able to accrue points and redeem flights ononeworld® carrier flights.

Beginning in 2009, we launched Multiplus, a loyalty network that integrates the TAM Fidelidade and allows our members to accumulate points, not just by flying with TAM, but also by making purchases through credit cards or using services and products at Multiplus partner establishments. TAM Fidelidade is one of several coalition partners of the Multiplus network of loyalty programs.

Points earned by TAM Fidelidade members must be redeemed for tickets within two years. This two year period for redemption limits the growth in liabilities arising from Multiplus, assuming a stable trend in relation to the number of passengers flyingwe carry.

Multiplus

In 2009, TAM launched Multiplus, a company designed to create a broader network in which TAM’s customers can earn points through the TAM Fidelidade Program. Multiplus is a coalition of loyalty programs that permits the accrual of points for redemption from products and services offered by many different partner companies, not just ours. We believe this expanded network helps to capture and retain customers and increase sales. It is attractive to our less frequent flyers because it allows them to accrue loyalty points in many ways besides flying. We believe Multiplus is a source of value generation and after its initial public offering, the company increased its corporate governance, dedicating a team that, we believe, will improve sales even more. At the end of 2012, Multiplus had 200 partner establishments, including the TAM Fidelidade Program.

TAM Linhas Aereas and Multiplus recently entered into an amendment of their operating agreement, which governs the relationship between the two companies and the purchase of airline tickets to be used for redemptions of Multiplus points. The new amendment, effective June 1, 2013, sets a fixed value for each 10,000 Multiplus points redeemed for TAM tickets during a 12 month pricing assessment phase. At the end of the pricing assessment phase, the price of tickets will be set by reference to the then available public fare for flights from the same origin to the same destination with LAN, who are membersthe same duration and flight travel plan, less an agreed discount. This discounted price will also be subject to a maximum and minimum range, calculated with reference to a 5% cost variation (increase and decrease) from the fixed price per 10,000 points applicable during the assessment phase.

Multiplus points must be redeemed within two years, and historically approximately 21.3% of points expire without being redeemed. This two year redemption can affect our LANPASS frequent flyer program, grew 7% during 2011.ability to recognize revenue from the TAM Fidelidade program. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—Critical Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition–Frequent Flyer Programs.”

Multiplus is a publicly traded company in Brazil, and TAM owns 73% of the ordinary shares of Multiplus.

Cargo Operations

General

The following table sets forth certain of our cargo operating statistics for domestic and international routes for the periods indicated:

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended and as at
December 31,
 
  2011 2010 2009   LATAM
2012

Pro
forma
 LATAM
2011

Pro
forma
 LAN
2010
Actual
 

The Company

    

ATKs (millions)

       7,645.9    7,683.5    4,628.7  

Total

   5,192.7    4,628.7    3,848.9  

RTKs (millions)

       4,488.3    4,597.8    3,245.3  

Total

   3,612.4    3,245.3    2,627.4  

Weight of cargo carried (thousands of tons)

       1,154.0    1,165.2    780.8  

Total

   874.9    780.8    649.3  

Total cargo yield (cargo revenues/RTKs, in US cents)

   43.6    39.5    34.1     43.2    45.0    39.5  

Total cargo load factor (%)

   69.6  70.1  68.3   58.7  59.8  70.1

Our cargo business generated revenues of US$1,280.7 million in 2010 and US$1,576.5 million in 2011. This represented 28.3% and 27.6% of our total revenues, respectively. Cargo revenues declined 32.1% between 2008 and 2009 primarily due to the global economic crisis that affected the industry and the decline in salmon exports from Chile due to the ISA virus. Nevertheless, during 2010 and 2011 revenues increased 43.0% and 23.1%, respectively, on a year-over-year basis as we took advantage of the recovery of world cargo markets.

(1)Information provided for the Company as of December 31, 2010 includes LAN Cargo and its affiliates operations, but do not include operating statistics of TAM for such period. Information provided for the Company as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 has been presented on a pro forma basis and includes pro forma operating statistics for LAN and TAM’s respective cargo operations during such periods.

Our cargo business generally operates on the same route network used by our passenger airline business, which is supplemented byand on some freighter-only operations.routes as well. Overall, it includes approximately 86144 destinations (over 66(of which approximately 135 are operated by passenger and/or freighter aircraft and approximately 209 are operated only by freighter aircraft). We complement our own international operations through coordination with our regional affiliates, MasAir in Mexico, ABSA in Brazil and Lanco in Colombia. ABSA also operates in the Brazilian domestic market since March 2009. We carry cargo for a variety of customers, including other international air carriers, freight-forwarding companies, export oriented companies and individual consumers. For information about our fleet, see “—Fleet—General” below.

We transport cargo in four ways: (i) in the bellies of our passenger aircraft, (ii) in our own dedicated freighter fleet, (iii) in belly space that we purchase from other airlines and, (iv) in aircraft that we charter or lease pursuant to ACMI contracts (Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance and Insurance). Under the latter, which are also known as “wet-leases,” the lessor operates the aircraft and provides the aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance pursuant to short- short—and medium-term contracts. Our dedicated freighter fleet consists of 12 Boeing 767-300 freighters, which have a capacity for 54 tons of freight each, and four Boeing 777-200 freighters, which have a capacity of 104 tons of freight each. During the second half of 2012, we incorporated two Boeing 777-200 freighters to our fleet.

Prior to the combination of LAN and TAM, we complemented our international cargo operations with domestic cargo services through our subsidiaries, LAN and LAN Cargo S.A. (“LAN Cargo”), and through three regional affiliates: Aerotransportes Mas de Carga S.A. de C.V. (“MasAir”) in Mexico, Linea Aerea Carguera de Colombia S.A. (“LANCO”) in Colombia and Aerolinhas Brasileiras S.A. (“ABSA”) in Brazil. In August 2012, ABSA and the cargo unit of TAM began the integration of their respective operations. Following the integration, the combined cargo businesses will operate in Brazil under the brand “TAM Cargo” and will be operated by ABSA. We expect to leverage the TAM Cargo brand, which has significant recognition in Brazil, to increase our presence in this market.

Our international cargo operations are headquartered in Miami, whoseMiami. This geographical location positions it as theis a natural gateway for Latin American imports and exports to and from the United States. Since 2001 weWe have operated in our 380,000 square-foot facilities within the Miami International Airport.Airport since 2001. In 2010 we upgraded this facility to enhance our ability to handle perishables and we leased an additional 117,000 square-foot warehouse close to our main facilities.

The United States accounts for the majority of the cargo traffic to and from Latin America. Besides being the main market for Latin American exports by air, the United States is also the main supplier of goods, such as high-tech equipment or spare parts, transported by air to Latin American countries.

We operate to threesix destinations in Europe: toAmsterdam, Frankfurt, London, Madrid, whichMilan and Paris. The last five we serve via passenger aircraft (using our(with flights from Santiago, Lima, Guayaquil, Sao Paulo and Guayaquil)Rio de Janeiro), and we serve Amsterdam through passenger and freighter operations. Additionally, we also serve Frankfurt (through bothvia our passenger flights and freighter operations since October 2002, when we signedconducted via our partnershipblock space agreement with Lufthansa Cargo (forCargo. For more information, on this agreement see “—Cargo Agreements” below), and Amsterdam (through freighter operations since October 2005).below.

In Latin America, the principal origins of our cargo are Chile, Colombia, Chile,Perú, Ecuador, Peru,Brazil and Argentina, and Brazil, which represent a large part of our northbound traffic. And forFor our southbound flights, Brazil is the main import market. In Brazil, we carry cargo for a variety of customers, including other international air carriers, freight-forwarding companies, export oriented companies and individual consumers. Colombia is Latin America’s largest market for exports by air to the United States, reaching an estimated 190,000 tons annually

In general terms, cargo flows are unidirectional. This characteristic is a key determinant in the structure of cargo operations as well as in the commercial conditions in the cargo business. This is especially relevant in markets featuring structural imbalances between inbound and outbound flows or during specific periods of such disequilibrium. Lack of demand in one particular direction may force airlines to rely on different markets in order to maximize loads on return flights. Furthermore, demand weakness in one direction may limit the capacity that is profitable to allocate to some routes, therefore creating pressure on fares in order to compensate for weaker revenues in one particular direction.

The evolution of our international cargo operations has always been affected by the flow imbalances of the Latin American cargo markets, resulting in a dramatic shift in the relative weight of southbound and northbound cargo flows throughout the years. For example, from 2002 to 2003 our international operations were characterized by very strong export traffic out of Latin America, but gradual increases in import demand, as well as the deceleration of export growth, led to more balanced cargo flows during 2004. Further extension of this trend led to excess demand on southbound routes since 2005.

We have designed our operations, route network and commercial strategies with the flexibility required to respond to changing conditions. As such, during 2003 we allocated additional capacity to northbound routes and adjusted fares on northbound routes in response to excess demand. During 2004 we gradually adjusted our operations to leverage a more balanced demand environment by performing an increased number of direct roundtrips between key export and import markets. However, weakness in exports since 2005 has driven us to support the northbound segment of certain routes with stopovers in additional export markets, to reduce northbound fares to stimulate demand and to raise southbound fares.

The flexibility that this business model allows based on adaptation to changes in market trends was key for LAN’sto LATAM’s operations in 2009 when the business was affected by the contraction of import and export markets in response to the global economic crisis. In addition LAN Cargo saw a sharp drop in salmon exports from Chile as a result of an outbreak of the ISA virus. Such flexibility has also been a key element in the recuperationrecovery and growth experienced by LAN Cargo since 2010.from 2010 to 2012.

The sharp contraction of LAN’sLATAM’s traditional markets in 2009 - 2009—imports into the region and exports from the region – followed by the rapid recovery of demand in 2010 required the Company to fully lever the flexibility of its business model. During 2009 the Company implemented of a series of measures such as the adjustment of its capacity through a reduction in the number of planes rented under Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance & Insurance (“ACMI”) agreements and adjustments in the operations of its own cargo fleet of Boeing 767F freighters. This process washas also been reinforced by the incorporation of twofour new Boeing 777-200F, the most modern and efficient cargo aircraft of their type in the world, with a capacity of 104tons104 tons of freight each and a range of 9,045 kilometers when carrying its maximum payload. This significant investment allowed LANLATAM to consolidate its regional competitiveness by positioning it as the first airline in the region, and only the second internationally, to use these latest-generation cargo planes.

The Company also achievedDuring 2012, pro forma cargo traffic decreased 2.4%, reflecting a significant regional expansionchallenging scenario in 2009. In March, LAN Cargo launched Lanco,Latin American cargo markets due to a subsidiarydecline in Colombia, which began operations after successfully obtaining the necessary operational and technical certification. It launched its services with two Boeing 767-300Fs, with a capacity for 54 tons of freight, connecting the cities of Bogotá and Medellín with Miami. It is important to note that Colombia is Latin America’s largest market for exports by air to the United States reaching an estimated 200,000 tons annually.

In addition, in March 2009, the Company’s cargo subsidiary in Brazil, ABSA, began operations in that country’s domestic market, with one flight daily, from Monday through Friday, between the cities of Sao Paulo and Manaus. On this route, ABSA operates an advanced-technology Boeing 767-300F with a capacity of 54 tons. This route accounts for a large part of Brazil’s airfreight traffic. Manaus is the country’s fourth largest city in terms of GDP, with a large number of companies, principally part of the electronics sector, in its industrial pole. The special tax incentives offered by the Amazon capital of Manaus as part of efforts to promote the area’s development, make it an attractive alternative for exporter and importer clients.

During 2010, revenue growth in the cargo business continued to reflect the Company’s ability to exploit the expansion in global cargo flows, as well as the development of key strategic initiatives. Active capacity management, with the purpose of optimizing capacity assignation coupled with new revenue management tools to manage cargo rates in response to demand enabled LAN Cargo to benefit from the growth trends seen in import marketson routes to Latin America, especially to Brazil. The expansion of operations to Europe utilizing the new Boeing 777-200 freighter fleet strengthened the Company’sBrazil, as well as increased competitive positionpressures from regional and further diversified its revenue base. Additionally, through its Brazilian affiliate, ABSA, the Company continued to strengthen domesticinternational cargo operations in Brazil. During 2010, ABSA launched operations from Sao Paulo to Recife and Fortaleza and added a second daily flight from Sao Paulo to Manaus. The Company also added capacity by securing three leased Boeing 767-300F, two of which were incorporated in late 2010 and one in early 2011. Furthermore, the Company continues to successfully optimize the capacity of the bellies of passenger aircraft to transport cargo, maximizing the synergies of the Company’s integrated passenger and cargo operation.

During 2011, cargo revenues grew 23.1%, reflecting the increase in traffic, with a growth of 11.5% of RTK. Capacity, measured in ATKs, increased 12.4% during 2011, resulting in a decrease of 0.5 points in load factors compared to 2010, reaching 69.6% in 2011. Yields increased 10.4% compared to 2010, driven by continuous improvement in revenue management tools, route optimization and higher transfer of costs through the surcharge fuel, increasing revenue per ATK in 9.5%.

The Company continues to increase selectively its capacity in order to meet demand in major markets where it operates. The growth of import flows in Latin America continues, but the weakening of cargo markets around the world has stimulated competition in South America, especially Brazil, where carriers from other regions have started operations. On the other hand, export volumes are recovering, partly driven by a gradual resurgence of exports of salmon in Chile. This capacity growth is being primarily fulfilled by the Company with the use of three Boeing 767-300F freighters, delivered to the Company between November 2010 and January 2011 with the purpose to increase its capacity on routes from Latin America to North America and Europe and routes between United States and Mexico. Furthermore, the Companycarriers. LATAM continues to optimize its cargo capacity by using the bellies of passenger aircraft for cargo purposes, thereby maximizing in this way the synergies of integrating the operations of both businesses.

DuringBecause of the difficult environment for cargo operations around the world during the last six years, we also improved our competitive position as key operators reduced their operations, and competitors such as UPS and FedEx either downsized their operations or exited some markets. Since mid-2004,year, competition increased in the region as regionalinternational carriers added idle capacity but despiteto service cargo operations. Despite this increase in competition, we have been able to maintain solid market shares in large part because of theby efficient utilization of our fleet and network. Today, on Latin America-United States routes, our main competitors are Centurion, Transportes Aéreos Mercantiles Panamericanos S.A., or TAMPA, and Polar Air, and onAtlas Air. On the Latin American-Europe routes, our main competitors are Cargolux, Lufthansa Cargo, Martinair, Air France-KLM, and recently Emirates Airlines.

Cargo Agreements

Since 2002, LanLAN Cargo and Lufthansa Cargo have hadoperated pursuant to a block space agreement betweencovering Europe and Latin America. As part of this agreement, Lan Cargo allocateswe allocate space to Lufthansa Cargo on itsour flights between selected cities in Latin America and Europe, and Lufthansa Cargo allocates space to Lan Cargous on its flights between Europe and Brazil and Argentina.Brazil.

We also have interline, codeshare and other commercial agreements with Asian carriers such as Korean Airlines, JAL, China Airlines, Air China and Cathay Pacific through which Lan Cargo receiveswe receive space allocations from these airlines to move our cargo from Seoul, Tokyo, Taipei, Shanghai and Hong Kong to two hubs in the United States—Los Angeles and Miami connectingMiami—where we can connect with our cargo network. In exchange, Lan Cargo provides themwe provide these airlines with space from these same two hubs in the United States to all Latin American destinations and also feedsprovide them with westbound cargo.

Marketing and Sales

Our sales and marketing efforts are carried out either directly, whenwhere we have a local office, or through general sales agents. In Latin America we have our own offices in all key markets. In the United States, we have our own offices in Miami,

New York and Los Angeles, and work with representatives in various other cities. In Europe, we have offices in Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Madrid and use agents in other key cities. Finally, inIn Asia, all our sales efforts are doneconducted through general sales agents. In total, we maintain a network of more than forty independent cargo sales agencies domestically and internationally.

Our cargo marketing strategy emphasizes our combination of freighter and passenger aircraft cargo capacity, which allows customers to ship large, bulky freight, as well as smaller, high-density cargo, fresh products, express shipments, and other types of cargo. Our cargo marketing strategy also emphasizes our high-quality services, scheduling flexibility and punctuality. On some routes, Lan Cargo offerswe offer special, value-added products such as Positive Flight Specific or FS,and Priority 1, which enables the customer to choose a specific passenger flight or access first available freighter capacity to transport its goods. During 2010, we also launched the first phase of a new revenue management project aimed at optimizing yields. In 2011, we obtained the first benefits of ayields, which has resulted in better capacity and overbooking administration and better pricing practices.practices in 2011 and 2012. During 2012, we started the roll-out (in New York, Miami and Mexico) of our online booking system (e-booking) allowing our customers to make reservations 24/7.

Cargo-Related Investigations

In February 2006 the European Commission (“EC”), in conjunction with the Department of Justice of the United States (“DOJ”), initiated a global investigation of a large number of international cargo airlines (among them Lan Cargo, LAN’s cargo subsidiary)LAN Cargo) for possible price fixing of cargo fuel surcharges and other fees in the European and United States air cargo markets. On December 26, 2007, the European competition authorities notified LanLAN Cargo and LANLATAM of the initiation of proceedings against twenty-five cargo airlines, among them LanLAN Cargo, for allegations of anti-competitive behavior in the airfreight business.

On January 21, 2009, LanLAN Cargo announced that it had reached a plea agreement with the DOJ in relation to the DOJ’s ongoing investigation regarding price fixing of fuel surcharges and other fees for cargo shipments. Under the plea agreement, LanLAN Cargo agreed to pay a fine of US$88 million. In addition, ABSA also reached a plea agreement with the DOJ and agreed to pay a fine of US$21 million. These amounts were stipulated to be paid over a five-year payment schedule starting in 2009. As of December 31, 2012, the pending amount to be paid during the next fourtwo years is approximately US$5422 million and has been recorded within “Other Accounts Payable.”

On November 9, 2010, the EC imposed fines toon 11 air carriers for a total amount of €800 million (equivalent to approximately US$1.1 billion). The fine imposed against LanLAN Cargo and its parent company, LAN, Airlines, totaled €8.2 million (equivalent to approximately US$10.9 million). The Company provisioned US$25 million during the fourth quarter of 2007 for such fines, and maintained this provision until the fine was imposed in 2010. In 2010, the Company recorded a US$14.1 million gain (pre-tax) from the reversal of a portion of this provision. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results.” This was the lowest fine applied by the EC, which includes a significant reduction due to the Company’s cooperation with the Commission during the course of the investigation. In accordance with European Union law, on January 24, 2011 this administrative decision was appealed by LanLAN Cargo and Lan AirlinesLAN to the General Court in Luxembourg. Any judgment by the General Court may also be appealed to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded a US$14.1 million gain (pre-tax) due to the reversal of a portion of the provision related to the investigation in the cargo business carried out by the European Commission. This was as a result of the fine announced in November 2010, which was lower than the amount provided for. This reversal is recorded in Other gains/(losses).

The investigation by the DOJ prompted the filing of numerous civil class actions by freight forwarding and shipping companies against many airlines, including LanLAN Cargo and LanLATAM Airlines Group, including fifty-four in the United States. The cases filed in the United States were consolidated in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York and the original complaint was subsequently amended to include additional airlines, including ABSA. On May 11, 2011, LanLAN Cargo announced that it had reached a settlement agreement with the class action plaintiffs in relation to this litigation. As per the settlement agreement, LanLAN Cargo agreed to pay US$59.7 million. Furthermore, ABSA also reached a settlement agreement with class action plaintiffs and agreed to pay US$6.3 million. The amounts were paid to plaintiffs’ counsel escrow account in 2011. DHL, a former member of the civil class action plaintiffs, timely opted out of the settlements agreement. LAN Cargo recently reached a settlement agreement with StarBroker A.G., on behalf of DHL Global Forwarding, whereby LAN Cargo agreed to pay US$8.2 million, of which US$7.1 million shall be recovered by LAN Cargo from the escrow amount set aside in the class action settlement previously paid by LAN Cargo for opt out plaintiffs.

In February 2006 the

The Canadian Competition Bureau (“CCB”), in conjunction with the DOJ, also initiated a global investigation of a large number of international cargo airlines (among them LanLAN Cargo) for possible price fixing of cargo fuel surcharges and other fees in the Canadian air cargo markets. Given the current stage of the proceeding, it is not possible at this time to anticipate with any precision the outcome of the investigation.markets in 2006. The CCB’s investigation prompted the filing of four separate civil class actions by freight forwarding and shipping companies against many

airlines, including LanLAN Cargo and Lan AirlinesLAN, in Canada. . On January 31, 2012, the respective Board of Directors of Lan AirlinesLAN and LanLAN Cargo approved a settlement agreement with the class actions plaintiffs. As per the settlement agreement, Lan Airlines and Lan Cargo agreed to pay theplaintiffs for an amount of CAD$700,000 (Canadian Dollars). The settlement agreement and payment are, which is pending court approval.

On April 5, 2008, Brazilian authorities notified ABSA of the initiation of administrative proceedings before theConselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (the Brazilian Antitrust Authority) against several cargo airlines and airline officers, among them ABSA, for allegations of anticompetitive practices regarding fuel surcharges in the air cargo business. Given the current stage of the proceedings, it is not possible at this time to anticipate with any precision the outcome of the civil actions filed against Lan Cargo,this matter, although it is expected to be a lengthy process.

In June 2008, the Korean Fair Trade Commission notified LAN of an investigation into the air cargo industrySee “Item 8. Financial Information—Consolidated Financial Statements and its non-compliance with the Monopoly RegulationOther Financial Information—Legal and Fair Trade Act and has requested information and documentation from LAN, which LAN duly submitted. On May 26, 2010 the Korean Fair Trade Commission announced the imposition of penalties against 29 other airlines and excluded LAN from further investigation.

The New Zealand Commerce Commission also initiated an investigation into potential anti-competitive activities in the international air cargo markets and requested information and documentation from LAN, which LAN duly submitted. On December 15, 2008, the New Zealand Commerce Commission announced it would focus its investigation on ten airlines and excluded LAN from further investigation.Arbitration Proceedings.”

Fleet

General

As of February 29,December 31, 2012, we operated a fleet of 150327 aircraft, comprised of 136311 passenger aircraft and 1416 cargo aircraft, as set forth in the following chart:

 

  Number of aircraft in operation   Average term of
lease remaining
(years)
   Average
age (years)
   Number of aircraft in operation   Average
term of
lease
remaining
(years)
   Average
age
(years)
 
  Total   Owned(1)   Operating Lease     Total   Owned(1)   Operating
Lease
         

Passenger aircraft

          

Passenger aircraft(2)

          

Airbus A320-Family Aircraft(3)

          

Airbus A318-100(4)

   10     10     —       —       3.7     5     5     0     0.0     4.3  

Airbus A319-100

   25     25     —       —       4.6     57     39     18     5.6     6.4  

Airbus A320-200

   42     33     9     5.4     4.7     141     76     65     3.5     6.1  

Airbus A321-200

   9     8     1     10.3     3.6  

Airbus A340-Family Aircraft

          

Airbus A340-300(5)

   5     2     3     1.0     12.5  

Airbus A340-500(6)

   2     2     0     0.0     8.5  

Airbus A330-200

   20     18     2     2.5     7.7  

Boeing 737-700

   9     0     9     1.6     9.4     6     0     6     1.5     10.1  

Boeing 767-300(6)(7)

   41     33     8     1.7     7.7  

Boeing B787-816

   3     3     0     0.0     0.3  

Boeing B777-32WER

   8     8     0     0.0     2.2  

Dash 8-200

   10     0     10     3.6     14.6     10     0     10     2.7     15.5  

Dash 8-400

   4     0     4     8.4     5.8  

Boeing 767-700

   31     21     10     2.1     8.6  

Airbus A340-300

   5     4     1     0.89     11.7  

Dash 8-Q400

   4     0     4     7.6     6.6  

Total passenger aircraft

   136     93     40     3.6     6.8     311     194     117     3.6     6.7  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Cargo aircraft

                    

Boeing 767-300 Freighter

   12     8     4     4.0     8.4  

Boeing 777-200 Freighter

   2     0     2     5.1     2.8  

Boeing 767-300 Freighter(7)

   12     8     4     3.2     9.2  

Boeing 777-200 Freighter(8)

   4     2     2     4.4     2.0  

Total cargo aircraft

   14     8     6     4.4     7.6     16     10     6     3.6     7.4  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total fleet(2)

   150     101     49     3.7     6.9  

Total fleet

   327     204     123     3.6     6.7  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Aircraft included within property, plant and equipment.

(2)Does not include one Boeing 767-200All passenger aircraft leasedbellies are available for cargo.
(3)Of these Airbus A320 Family Aircraft, 83 are utilized in LAN’s operations.
(4)As at December 31, 2012, we have sold 2 additional Airbus A318s in the redelivery process. We plan to Aeromexico.sell all 7 A318s during 2013, as part of our strategic fleet renewal plan.

LAN’s strategic fleet renewal plan involves the sale of five Airbus A318 aircraft during 2011, five during 2012 and five during 2013.

(5)All Airbus A340 aircraft are utilized in LAN’s operations.
(6)As a result of the business combination, 5 aircraft were added under operating lease contracts, which according to the stated policy, are classified as finance leases because the present value of the payments represents most of the economic value of the property. The useful life assigned to these aircraft is 6 years, according to the duration of the contracts.
(7)Of these Boeing B767-300, 38 are utilized in LAN’s passenger operations and 12 are used in LAN’s cargo operations.
(8)All Boeing 777-200 Frieghters are used in LAN’s cargo operations.

The daily average hourly utilization rates of ourLAN’s aircraft for each of the periods indicated are set forth below.

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  Year ended December 31,   2012 (1)   2011   2010   2009 
  2011   2010   2009   2008   (measured in hours) 
  (measured in hours) 

Passenger aircraft

                

Airbus A340-300

   14.2     14.6     14.5     14.6     13.9     14.2     14.6     14.5  

Boeing 767-300 ER

   12.8     13.5     13.2     13.6     12.1     12.8     13.5     13.2  

Airbus A320-Family Aircraft

   9.5     10.8     10.3     10.4  

Airbus A320 Family

   10.2     9.5     10.8     10.3  

Cargo aircraft

                

Boeing 767-300 Freighter

   14.8     15.4     14.7     16.7     13.5     14.8     15.4     14.7  

Boeing 777-200 Freighter

   14.3     14.2     10.6     —       14.1     14.3     14.2     10.6  

(1)2012 does not include aircraft used in TAM’s operations.

We operate different aircraft types as we perform various different missionsservices ranging from short-haul domestic and regional trips to long-haul trans-continental flights. We have selected our aircraft based on the ability to effectively and efficiently serve these missions while trying to minimize the number of aircraft families we operate.

For short-haul domestic and regional flights we principally operate the Airbus A320-Family aircraft and, since the acquisition of Aires (rebranded as LAN Colombia in 2011),2010, we also operate the Boeing 737-700 aircraft, the Dash 8-200 aircraft, and the Dash 8-4008-Q400 aircraft. The Airbus A320 Family that we currently operateA320-Family has been incorporated into our fleet pursuant to operating leases or havehas been purchased directly from Airbus pursuant to various purchase agreements since 1999. The last purchase was made in June 2011, where we ordered 20 A320 NEO aircraft. Consequently, as of February 29, 2012 we had outstanding orders for seven Airbus A319 aircraft, 52 Airbus A320 aircraft, 10 Airbus A321 aircraft for delivery between 2012 and 2016 and 20 Airbus A320 NEO aircraft for delivery between 2017 and 2018. Our purchase contracts with Airbus provide for some flexibility with regard to future changes in aircraft types and delivery dates. We believe that our fleet of A320-Family Aircraftaircraft will allow us to provide broader service across Latin America as well as the domestic markets that we serve given their longer range. We also believe that they will enable us to increase efficiency levels through reduced fuel consumption and maintenance costs.

For long-haul passenger and cargo flights we operate the Airbus A330-200 aircraft, the Airbus A340-300 aircraft, the Airbus A340-500 aircraft, the Boeing 767-300 passenger and cargo aircraft, andthe Boeing 777 Freighterpassenger and cargo aircraft and, since the fourth quarter of 2012, the Boeing B787-816 aircraft. The Boeing 767-300 aircraft’s size and range provides an optimal alternative for most of our long-haul passenger and cargo routes. Additionally, the commonality between the passenger and dedicated cargo versions allows us to leverage the ensuing economies of scale. We believe that these aircraft provide a key efficiency advantage over our peers, especially in the cargo business. The Boeing 767-300 aircraft that we currently operate have been incorporated into our fleet pursuant to operating leases or have been purchased directly from Boeing pursuant to various purchase orders since 1997. As of February 29, 2012 we had outstanding orders for 13 Boeing 767-300 aircraft. We also operate fiveOur Airbus A340-300 and A340-500 aircraft are also well-suited for long-haul routes. Givenroutes, given their range and four-engine configuration, these aircraft are well suited to perform trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific missions out of Santiago. In the future, we will operate Boeing 787 aircraft for our long-haul fleet, for which we have placed 26 orders and committed six operating leases. We expect to receive our first Boeing 787 in 2012. For our cargo operations, we operate 12 Boeing 767 freighter and 2 Boeing 777 freighter. We expect to receive two Boeing 777 freighter aircraft during 2012. For more information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts”.configuration.

During the first quarter of 2009, we initiated the process of incorporation ofincorporating winglets which are advanced technology devices, in all our passenger and Freighterfreighter Boeing 767-300 aircraft. Winglets are placed on the wings of an aircraft causingand have resulted in an approximate 5% reduction in average fuel consumption.consumption per year. The total investment in this project amountsis expected to be approximately US$100 million. As of February 29,December 2012, 4352 aircraft operated by LAN have been modified and US$76 million of the total investment has been disbursed.modified. We expect to continue withcomplete the implementation of this project during 20122013 as we continue to receive our last 4 Boeing 767s.

See “Item 5—F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations” for a description of our purchase obligations for aircraft, for delivery between 2013 and 2019.

Fleet Leasing and Financing Arrangements

OurLATAM’s financing and leasing methods include borrowing from financial institutions and leasing under financial leases, tax leases and operating leases. As of December 31, 2012, LATAM had 327 aircraft, of which 10 were in redelivery process, totaling 317 aircraft in operation. Of these aircraft, 159 are operated by LAN and 158 aircraft are operated by TAM.

In 2000, to finance AirbusAs of December 31, 2012, LAN’s operating fleet was comprised of 99 financial leases, 11 tax leases, 45 operating leases and 4 unencumbered aircraft. Most of the LAN’s financial and tax leases are structured for a 12-year period. LAN has 36 aircraft LAN entered into a US$1.3 billion umbrella credit facility with a syndicate of international financial institutions under which the Company borrowed in the form of separate loans in connection with the specific financing requirements of each Airbus aircraft (including pre-delivery and long-term financing). This umbrella facility was guaranteedleases supported by the English, French and German Export Credit Agencies. The repayment profile for each aircraft financed under the facility was for a period of up to eighteen years. Under this financing package LAN incorporated Airbus aircraft into its fleet through operating leases, financial leases and tax leases. Even though this facility covered the aircraft scheduled to be delivered under our 1998/9 Airbus purchase agreements through December 31, 2006, the Company decided to fund the 2006 deliveries with a new facility negotiated in 2006. This new facility financed the acquisition of

eight Airbus A319 delivered in 2006;

five A318 and two A320 delivered in 2007;

ten A318, two A319 and two A320 delivered in 2008; and

three A319 delivered in the first quarter of 2009.

This new US$920 million facility is similar to the previous one as there are separate loans drawn in connection with the specific financing requirements of each Airbus aircraft and is also based on support guarantees from the European Export Credit Agencies namely Compagnie Francaise d’Assurance pour le Commerce Exterieur (Coface), Euler Hermes Kreditversicherungs-AG (Euler Hermes) and the Secretary of State of Her Britannic Majesty’s Government acting by the Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD). Under this financing package LAN incorporated into its fleet Airbus aircraft through financial leases. The facility covered 85.0% of the purchase price of each aircraft plus the associated export credit agencies premium. The remaining 15.0% was funded directly by the Company. There is no remaining drawdown availability under this facility.

Between 2004 and 2006, LAN ordered 15 Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft and freighters for delivery between 2005 and 2008. In 2004 the Company structured a new syndicated facility for US$260 million to finance the entire cost of the two Boeing 767-300 freighters delivered in 2005 and the first Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft delivered in 2006. In 2005, LAN finalized the syndicated facility to fund the purchase of four Boeing 767-300 passenger and freighter aircraft for delivery in 2006. Between 2005 and 2006, LAN also finalized two additional syndicated facilities to fund the purchase of the remaining eight Boeing 767-300 Passenger aircraft. Three of these aircraft were delivered in 2007, and five were delivered in 2008. Each loan with respect to these aircraft is guaranteed by theU.S. Export-Import Bank of the United States (“Ex-ImEXIM Bank”) with a twelve-year profile for the financing of 85.0% of the aircraft value.

In June 12, 2005, LAN finished the payments with respect to a Boeing 767-200 aircraft that was held under a financial lease. This aircraft was subleased to a third party at market rate until December 2011. As of February 29, 2012, the aforementioned aircraft was in process of being returned by the third party to LAN.

In 2006, LAN also ordered three additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft for delivery between 2009 and 2010. The first aircraft, which was delivered in November 2009, was financed through the issuance of an Ex-Im-Bank guaranteed bond and through LAN’s own funds (85.0% and 15.0%, respectively). The remaining two aircraft were financed through a new Ex-Im Bank guaranteed facility and through LAN’s own funds (85.0% and 15.0%, respectively).

In April 2007, LAN entered into two lease agreements with GE Commercial Aviation Services for the lease of two Boeing 777-200LR freighters, for delivery in 2009. In October 2007, we signed a purchase agreement with the Boeing Company for two additional Boeing 777-200LR freighters to be delivered in 2011 and 2012. In March 2010, LAN and the Boeing Company agreed to switch the first Boeing 777-200LR freighter for two Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft to be delivered in 2011.

In the second half of 2007, the Company decided to acquire thirty-two new Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft with deliveries initially scheduled between 2011 and 2016. The Company entered into a purchase agreement with the Boeing Company for 26 of these aircraft and entered into a leasing agreement with theInternational Lease Finance Corporation for the remaining six aircraft.

In November 2008, the Company entered into a purchase agreement for four additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft to be delivered in 2012. In March 2010, LAN decided to replace three of these passenger aircraft with three Boeing 767-300 freighters to be delivered between 2013 and 2014. The fourth aircraft was rescheduled to be delivered in 2011. During the last quarter of 2010, LAN decided to exchange the three Boeing 767 Freighters with three Boeing passenger 767-300 aircraft with deliveries in 2012. As part of this same contract, LAN also ordered a Boeing 777 Aircraft to be delivered in 2012.

During 2008, LAN decided to exercise 15 options to acquire A320-Family Aircraft. Six of these aircraft were delivered in 2010 and the remaining nine were delivered in 2011. In March 2010, LAN entered into a credit facility to finance the entire pre-delivery payments attached to these 15 aircraft. In April 2010, LAN entered into an agreement to finance the purchase of these 15 aircraft partially guaranteed71 supported by the European Export Credit Agencies and partially through its own funds (85.0% and 15.0%, respectively)(the “ECAs”).

In the third quarter of 2010, LAN entered into three lease agreements with GE Commercial Aviation Services for the six year lease of Boeing 767-300 Freighters already delivered in November 2010, December 2010 and January 2011.

In December 2009, LAN entered into a purchase agreement with Airbus for 30 aircraft of the A320 family to be delivered between 2011 and 2014.

In July 2010, LAN entered into a purchase agreement with Airbus for an additional 50 aircraft of the A320 family to be delivered between 2012 and 2016.

In September 2010, LAN entered into two new six-year LAN’s operating lease agreements with AerCap formaturities are within a maturity range from 2 A320 aircraft for our operations in Colombia.

In January 2011, LAN entered into a seven-year lease agreement with the Bank of China Aviation Pte. Ltd. for one A320 aircraft.

In February, 2011, LAN increased its long haul aircraft orders by three Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft with deliveries in the second half of 2012. In May 2011, LAN ordered five additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft to be delivered between the last quarter of 2012 and the third quarter of 2013.

In June 2011, LAN signed a purchase agreement with Airbus for 20 A320 of the NEO Aircraft family, from which 10 of them are expected to be delivered in 2017 and the other half in 2018.

As of February 29, 2012, and as a result of the aircraft purchase agreements entered into with Airbus in 2009, 2010 and 2011, LAN has 89 Airbus passenger aircraft of the A320 family expected to be delivered between 2012 and 2018.

During the last quarter of 2011, LAN signed a purchase agreement for two Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft with deliveries in the third and fourth quarter of 2012.

Regarding our Boeing fleet, nine Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft are expected to be delivered in 2012 and four in 2013. We expect 32 Boeing 787-8/9 passenger aircraft to be delivered between 2012 and 2018 and two Boeing 777-freighter to be delivered in 2012.

As of February 29, 2012, we held 49 aircraft under operating leases compared to 46 as of February 29, 2011. Twenty three of these aircraft are related to Lan Colombia domestic operations which consist of 9 Boeing 737-700, 10 Dash 8-200 and 4 Dash 8-400 aircraft. Under the terms of our operating leases, we are required to return the aircraft in an agreed upon condition at the end of the lease. Although the title to the aircraft remains with the lessor, we are responsible during the lease term for the maintenance, servicing, insurance, repair and overhaul of the aircraft.12 years.

As of December 31, 2011, aggregate future minimum lease payments required under2012, TAM’s operating fleet included 76 financial leases, 17 tax leases and 65 operating leases. For accounting purposes TAM classifies 9 tax leases as operating leases in the financial statements. TAM has 8 aircraft supported by EXIM Bank and 39 supported by the ECAs. TAM’s operating leases maturities are within a maturity range from 5 to 13 years.

LATAM’s aircraft debt, which is comprised of financial and tax leases, is denominated in US dollars and primarily requires quarterly amortization payments. The financial leases have a bank as counterparty and the tax leases have a bank and a third party involved. 86.4% of our aircraft operatingdebt is fixed rate and the rest is floating rate debt based on the USD LIBOR. During 2012, LATAM refinanced and pre-financed all of its Boeing deliveries for the year (and refinanced 3 Boeing aircraft from 2011) with EXIM guaranteed bonds in the U.S. market, placing the first pre-funded EXIM bond transaction in history.

Going forward, LATAM will be the entity that takes delivery and is the lessee on all related leases of all aircraft for the group. Pursuant to this strategy, all Boeing aircraft deliveries during 2012 (18 wide body aircraft), were US$705 million. Our operating leasesmade to LATAM, and LATAM will have terms ranging from three monthsthe ability to twelve years fromsublease them to other airlines of the date ofgroup. LATAM began to take delivery of Airbus aircraft (22 narrow body aircraft in total during 2012), starting in the aircraft. For more information, see Note 2.21third quarter of 2012. LATAM also has the ability to our audited consolidated financial statements. For more information on our expected future capital expenditures in connection withsublease Airbus aircraft purchases seeto other airlines of the group.

See “Item 5. Operating5—B. Liquidity and Financial ReviewCapital Resources—Sources of financing” and Prospects—“Item 5—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures”. for a description of expected sources of financing and expected expenditures on aircraft.

Maintenance

LAN’s Maintenance

Our heavy maintenance, line maintenance and component shopshops are equipped and certified to service our entire fleet of Airbus, Boeing and Bombardier aircraft. Our maintenance capabilities allow us flexibility in scheduling airframe maintenance, offering us an alternative to third-party maintenance providers.

LAN facilities at Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport in Santiago, Chile are among the most extensive in Latin America and have been certified according to IOSA standards and as a FAA approved repair station. Our hangars and components shopsfacilities at our Santiago repair station can service the Boeing 787, Boeing 767, Boeing 777, Airbus 340 and Airbus 320 Family Aircraft fleet, as well as designing and manufacturing galleys, structures and composite materials. We also have the capability to retrofit aircraft interiors, including sophisticated in-flight entertainment equipment, and blended winglets in the Boeing 767 fleet. LAN facilities at El Dorado International Airport in Bogotá, Colombia can service the Boeing 737 and the Dash 8 Q200 - Q4008-200 fleet.

Our engineering and maintenance division is supervised by the local DGAC and it is subjected to several recurrent external audits from civil aviation authorities and international entities such as the FAA, the Argentine

DireccióAdministración Nacional de AeronavegabilidadAviación Civil (the National Directorate of Airworthiness) (“DNA”ANAC”), the BrazilianAgencia Nacional de Aviacao Civil (“ANAC”), the EcuadorianDirección General de Aeronáutica Civil (“DGAC Ecuador”), the PeruvianDirección General de Aeronáutica Civil (“DGAC Peru”), the ColombianUnidad Administrativa Especial de Aeronáutica Civil (the UAEAC), the International Air Transport Association Operational Safety Audit (“IOSA”) (from the International Air Transport Association or “IATA”) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (“ICAO”), in order to strictly comply with applicable regulations. The audits are conducted in connection with each country’s certification procedures and enable us to continue to perform maintenance for aircraft registered in the certificating jurisdictions. Our repair station holds FAA Part-145 certifications under these approvals.

We also rely on third parties for certain maintenance support for our aircraft and engines.engines, where long term partnerships take place with the following MROs (Maintenance Repair and Overhaul facilities): Lufthansa Technik provides our Airbus A320-Family Aircraft and A340 Aircraft component support on a power-by-the-hour basis under a long-term contract, which runs until 2019.support. International Aero Engines, and CFM International and Pratt & Whitney, provides the A320 and A319 engine support on a power-by-the-hour contract, which runs for twelve years once each engine is received. Pratt and Whitney provides the A318 engine support on a power-by-the-hour basis contract, which runs for ten years once an engine is received. General Electric provides the maintenance of our Airbus A340 engines under a similar contract, which runs for twelve years once an engine is received. In addition, General Electric provides for the maintenance of most of our Boeing 767 engines under a contract effective until 2013. Third parties also provide certain additionalFamily engine maintenance services. Air France-KLM, whichGeneral Electric also provides engine maintenance services have been contracted until 2015, provides the maintenance of our Boeing 777 engines and components and to ourfor Boeing 767-300 components.aircraft as well as Air France KLM for the Boeing 777-300F, which also includes components support.

We occasionallyOccasionally, we perform certain maintenance services for other airlines.

Our aircraft maintenance personnel participatesparticipate in extensive training programs at the jointly operated Lufthansa LAN Technical Training S.A., located in Santiago, Chile.

In 2011, LAN continued implementingLATAM continues to implement the LEAN management system known as LEAN in an effortits maintenance operations, to increase efficiency throughout its maintenance network. The adoption of this system constituted a redesigning of processes which detect problems during aircraft maintenance and offer a solution. The foregoing renders the daily tasks and processes carried out within the Company more efficient. Internationally, the LEAN system has been definedrecognized as a methodology for achieving excellence and continuous improvement. It seeks to eliminate activities that do not add value to processes, and suppressing those activities that are superfluous, thereby allowing companies to reduce costs, improve processes, reduce errors and increase customer satisfaction.

During the last year, LAN continuedcontinues to benefit from the implementation of LEAN in heavy and line maintenance. Heavy maintenance is performed approximately every 12–18 months or a specific amount of actual flight hours as defined by the manufacturer, while line maintenance is performed on a daily basis. In 2011,Since 2009, we have achieved a reduction of approximately a 30.0% reduction30% to 40% in the time an aircraft remains inat the hangar. Moreover, we achieved a 30.0% to 50.0% reduction of over 20% in the time for some of the most demanding tasks in line maintenance and a 15.0%over 30% increase on workers’ productivity. Other benefits of LEAN include a reduction of approximately 64.0%19% in labor accidents in heavy maintenance areas, a reduction of 80.0%approximately 80% on delaysdelayed deliveries of aircraft from programmed maintenance, and a considerable improvement on dispatch reliability. Furthermore, LEAN has had important benefits in terms of employee motivation, by establishing clear roles, setting new challenges and achievements,rewarding team achievements.

TAM’s Maintenance

TAM’s MRO (Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul) Business Unit provides services to LATAM fleet as well as third-party customers. It is located in São Carlos (SP/Brazil) Technological Center in an area of 100,000 m² with a dedicated runway of 1,720 meters.

TAM MRO is certified and audited by major international aeronautical authorities such as FAA (USA), EASA (Europe), ANAC (Brazil), DGAC (Chile), ANAC Argentina, DGCA (Ecuador), DINAC (Paraguay), TC (Canada), among others, for Heavy Maintenance and Components Repair and Overhaul for Airbus A-320 family (A-318, A-319, A-320 & A-321) and Airbus A-330, Boeing 767, ATR-42/72, and Embraer E-Jet 170/190 families. TAM MRO also has some minor capabilities for repair and overhaul of Airbus A-340 and Boeing 777 components. TAM MRO is a FAA Part-145 certified repair station and also part of the implementationselected group of LEAN has had an important benefitcertified MROs in the Airbus MRO Network.

TAM’s hangars can accommodate 6 aircraft (Narrowbody/Widebody) and 3 Regional/Turboprop aircraft simultaneously, and we have a dedicated hangar for stripping and painting. We also have 22 technical shops, including full Landing Gear repair & overhaul shop, Hydraulics, Pneumatics, Electronics (ATEC), Electrical Components, Electroplating, Composites, Wheels & Brakes, Interiors and Escape Slides shops.

In 2012, TAM MRO effectively applied 1.3 million man-hours (a 20% increase compared with 2011), serviced 158 aircraft, including C, D and Special Checks for LATAM fleet and for third party customers, delivered approximately 68,000 components and performed 12 landing gear overhauls. In 2012, TAM MRO serviced almost 100% of all TAM’s Airbus A-320 family and A-330 demand for Heavy Maintenance, and 75% of demand for Components Repair & Overhaul. TAM’s external maintenance and repair customers include Azul, Trip, Avianca, the Brazilian Air Force, Embraer, Goodrich, and Hamilton Sundstrand, among others.

TAM’s structure in São Carlos includes engineering capabilities, a full technical training center which develops TAM’s capabilities in terms of human skills with more than 4,000 students and 42,000 hours of training in 2012, providing 50 different basic courses, on-the-job training and special training such as structural, avionics, foreign language and leadership training and education.

In 2011 TAM started a turn-around process to achieve international MRO competitive standards in terms of costs, quality, reliability and time of deliveries (TAT) and in 2012 TAM began to implement the LEAN system and other activities, including continuous process improvement culture, redesign of the production methodology in productive cells and scheduling of task through CCPM methodology (Critical Chain Project Management), development of shop-floor control systems and carry out VSM process modeling for Landing Gear shop. These initiatives have led to significant accomplishments in 2012: an increase of 18% in employee motivation.productivity, a 17.5% reduction in heavy check costs and significantly improved reliability of aircraft and components, reductions of 15% in aircraft time in hangar and 28% in components service time, 100% on-time deliveries of heavy-checks and 95% on time deliveries of components, and 118 days of operations without accidents.

TAM’s line maintenance is fully capable to provide services to all types of Airbus and Boeing aircraft of TAM fleet. Operations in TAM’s extensive network of 41 domestic destinations are supported by TAM maintenance staff; in the international maintenance line stations, there is a mix of TAM staff and qualified outsourced line maintenance providers.

TAM’s maintenance and engineering organization in Brazil is supervised by the BrazilianAgência Nacional de Aviação Civil (‘ANAC’). TAM Mercosur’s operations are supervised by the ParaguayanDirección Nacional de Aeronáutica Civil (‘DINAC’). All operations are subjected to periodic audits by these regulatory authorities. As IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA)-certified airlines, TAM and TAM Mercosur are also periodically audited by IOSA-qualified Audit Organizations to guarantee fully compliance with applicable regulations.

In addition to the broad capability of TAM heavy maintenance facilities in São Carlos for aircraft and components, TAM relies on a range of qualified third parties maintenance providers, including MTU Aero Engines in Germany and GE Celma In Brazil for Airbus A320-Family IAE and CFM engines, General Electric facilities in USA and Europe for A330, B767 and B777 GE engines and Pratt & Whitney in Singapore for A330 P&W engines. Third parties also provide certain additional components applicable to TAM fleets.

LATAM Safety and Security

LATAM has been working to standardize LAN and TAM’s operational indicators regarding safety, audits and emergency response. This process of identifying synergies in LAN and TAM’s operational indicators has led to opportunities to improve processes and standardize operational processes and audits.

LAN’s Safety and Security Corporate Direction

The Safety and Security Corporate Direction (“SSCD”) is an internal division in charge of the management of safety and security matters related to flight operations, operative and administrative buildings, organization and coordination of emergency response matters, safety and security audits and safety and occupational health.

The SSCD reports directly to LAN’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), which reflects the firm commitment that the Company’s senior management has with its employees.to the Safety & Security. The SSCD is comprised of five independent reporting management areas: safety management, security management, emergency response management, Safety & Security Audit management and Safety and Occupational Health Management.

Safety Management

We give high priority to providing safe and reliable air service, as it is considered a fundamental asset to LAN and one of the basic pillars for the development of our Company.service. We have uniform safety standards and safety-related training programs that cover all of our operations. LAN has implemented a Safety and QualitySystem called LAN I-AMS (LAN Integrated Airline Management System (“SMS”)System) throughout the operational areas of the Company, which is certified by the Chilean DGAC and IOSA System. The SMSLAN I-AMS integrates Safety, Safety Assurance, Emergency Response, Security and Occupational Safety and Health management and provides clear definitions of the functions and responsibilities regarding operational safety for all persons involved, from the top to the bottom of the operational structure of the airline. It strengthens the commitment and knowledge required from everyone in the Company regarding any and all actions that could affect safety.

The Operational Safety DirectorSenior Manager (“OSD”SSM”) is responsible for the Operational Safety Oversight and the implementation of the SMS.LAN I-AMS. The OSDSSM supervises a staff of approximately twenty-one21 safety specialists of different backgrounds, including pilots, aeronautical engineers, aircraft maintenance engineers, a psychologist, and dangerous goods and ground handling safety specialists.

Our corporate operational safety organization consists of fourthree main areas:

 

Flight Safety Management: The Flight Safety Area oversees and audits our operational safety measures, investigates major incidents and programs and controls the LOSA and FOQA Programs (as defined below). The Flight Safety Area also oversees and audits safety measures related to ground handling and cargo areas and investigates related incidents.

 

Maintenance Safety Management: The Maintenance Safety Area oversees and audits our maintenance safety measures and investigates maintenance-related incidents.

Flight Data Monitoring Management: The Flight Data Monitoring Area is responsible for the maintenance and administration of the recorded flight data and safety-related databases and software.

The main safety programs, elements and procedures include:

 

  

Flight Operations Quality Assurance (“FOQA”). Since the end of 2002, LAN has been implementing a Flight Data Monitoring (“FDM”) program using two different analysis programs. The FDM program is fully developed for the A320-Family Aircraft, A340, Boeing B767, and B777 fleet. The statistical information obtained has produced standard operational procedure changes and valuable inputs to the Advance Qualification Program project. We have also fully developed a maintenance variation for the same fleets which monitors the engines, flight controls and general performance of the airplanes.

 

  

Mandatory Occurrence and Mandatory Reports. Our operations policy manuals define the incidents that require a mandatory report. On a voluntary basis, personnel can provide confidential reports to the flight safety area in hard copy or electronic form.

 

  

Safety Information Management. All safety information regarding all occurrences is entered into dedicated software, where it is analyzed according to its potential risk. Important incidents are investigated thoroughly. The relevant areas related to each particular incident implement corrective actions with the assistance of the corporate operational safety directory.

 

  

Line Operation Safety Audit (“LOSA”). LOSA is a program designed to survey and analyzeanalyzes the safety components of our equipment and operations. LOSA observations have been conducted on the A-340, A-320 and Boeing B767 fleets. In 2007, a second LOSA observation has been applied to the A-340 fleet, which has given important information of the effectiveness of the corrective actions recommended by the first observation conducted in 2004. The LOSA program will be applied to all B767 fleets in 2013.

  

Human Factors Program. This program is based on a manual developed by LAN that includes all interconnectivities between flight operations and human factors. The program includes a Fatigue Risk Management Program that is being implemented since 2008. The program also includes Crew Resource Management and Flight Crews Training and study of incidents using the Threat and Error Management (“TEM”) model.

 

  

Quality Assurance and IOSA and ISAGO Certification Programs. Our flight and maintenance safetyoperational areas have a quality assurance system. Our safety management system is based on the ISO 9001-2000 standards. We also periodically evaluate the skills, experience and safety records of our flight crews in order to maintain strict control over the quality of our flight crews. All of our aircraft pilots participate in training programs, some of which are sponsored by aircraft manufacturers, and all are required to undergo recurrent training. LAN Airlines and passenger and cargo subsidiaries are IOSA registered. We also have ISAGO certification for LAN, LAN Argentina, LAN Ecuador, LAN Peru and LAN Ecuador.Masair.

We also have anOur operational safety committee, composed of senior executives and key operational managers, is responsible for the initiation of safety-related actions.

All of our Boeing 767, A320 Family, A340 and Boeing 777 and 787 fleets are equipped with an enhanced ground proximity warning system, a traffic collision avoidance system, a wind shear detection system and reduced vertical separation minimum capabilities.

Since 1991, we have had no accidents involving major injury to passengers, crew or aircraft.

Security Management

The main policy and the essential principle of the Company is to ensure an adequate security protection to all its flights, aircraft, passengers, crew members, ground personnel, airport facilities and other services related to the commercial civil aviation against any threat or unlawful action.

The Company hasWe have implemented corporate policies and a quality management system through the operational system to detect any lack of security in its operations. Auditsoperations and assessments areprevent acts of unlawful interference. Risk analysis is used to assigndetermine different levels of security to be implemented to international and domestic operations.

The Security Corporate Security Manager (“CSM”SCM”) has the responsibility to evaluate, analyze and assign threatrisk levels (high, medium, low) to international and domestic operations, proposing security procedures for each scenario. The CSMSCM leads an organization of five security managers and approximately fifteeneight security specialists. These specialists analyze high risk flights and all the aspects of the operation that could cause an impact in the normal daily activities of the Company. Finally, the security management is controlled and audited constantly. The current CSMSCM is a former police officer with more than 25 years of experience in the civil aviation.

The corporate security organization has five main areas:

Domestic Security Operations: that report to a former police officer with more than 20 years of experience in the civil aviation.

International Security Operations: that reportThe corporate security organization has three main areas: standards, procedures and quality control; planning and management control; and dangerous goods. Additionally, our SCM gives support to a former police officer, with more than 20 years of experience in civil aviation.

North America, Caribbean and Europe Security Operations: that report to a security specialist, with more than 18 years of experience in civil aviation.

Argentinean Security Operations: that report to a security specialist, with more than 30 years of experience in civil aviation.

Peruvian Security Operations: that report to a security specialist, with more than 19 years of experience in civil aviation.

Eachthe different areas of the five areas is subdivided inCompany related to training, internal investigations, fraud, training, cargo and passengers’ security, security of facilities and quality control.travel documentation assistance.

Since 2002, the Company’s Corporate Security Manual has unified international and domestic security procedures:

Manual de Gestión de Seguridad (Manual of Security Management). The basis for local security procedures.

Airport Security Plan or Airport Security Program. Approved by the DGACprocedures, including local security procedures; airport security programs for each country in which we have operations. Itoperations, which includes procedures to prevent unlawful conduct and procedures for a bomb threat or hijacking drill.

Corporate Security Training Program. It includes the contents and definitions regardingdrill; corporation security training for all areas involved inprograms regarding the acceptance of aircraft, baggage, cargo and passengers.

Airport Security Inspection Program. It has the contents and definitionspassengers an airport security audit procedures regarding airport inspectionsinspections; and identification of security issues and corrective action plans for non-compliance.

Emergency Response Management

The emergency response areamanagement team is responsible for the administration of the Emergency Response Plan (ERP). It has been developed for the effective management of different kinds of emergencies (aircraft accidents, and serious incidentsnatural disasters, strikes, pandemics) with the purpose of mitigating any impacts of emergencies on the passengerpassengers and their relatives, andas well as the Company’s operations.

The ERP consists mainly of:includes:

 

Emergency Procedures. They are widely advertised inside the Company,process and procedures approved by the DGACauthority and coveredsupported by the Emergency AdministrationResponse Preparation Manual.

Emergency Response Centre (ERC). The ERCControl Center in Santiago, Chile, includes three principal areas:rooms for: the Emergency StrategyExecutive Committee, the Emergency ResolutionResponse Committee and the Public RelationsMedia Monitoring Area. Those areas are located at Santiago, Chile. Most of them have meetings rooms, computers, satellite TV, conference call systems, video conference facilities, kitchens and rest rooms.& Communications Coordination Committee.

 

SpecialRelatives & Passengers Assistance Team (SAT). We have(the “APF Team”), a humanitarian assistance programteam of volunteers that we deploy for familyassistance of employees, crew, passengers and passenger assistance.their relatives. We have about 1,200 total1,300 active volunteers distributed as follows: Santiago (700(600 volunteers), Miami (120(50 volunteers), Lima (210(200 volunteers), Ecuador (110Guayaquil & Quito (150 volunteers), and Buenos Aires (90(100 volunteers) and Bogota (200). Our SATAPF team is complemented by service vendors.

 

Telephone Inquiry Center. It isNotification Team, located in the Call Center Offices, Santiago, Chile, at our call-center office and has 500 agents. There are 18notify individuals designed by passengers as an emergency contact number.

Assistance Center, located in the Call Center Offices, Santiago, Chile, where about 300 agents working through 14 toll free lines can be activated for family memberreceiving calls from relatives and arefriends of passengers involved in an emergency situation. The Assistance Center telephone numbers will be published throughby the company web siteCompany (on its EWS) and theby media, in case of emergencies.

 

Go Team. We haveEmergency Web Site (EWS), which will replace LATAM’s commercial web site and be activated as soon as an emergency or accident occurs. The EWS be a resource for flight information (check-in, flight status, etc.) and general information, and will contain press releases and other information (including notices by the APF Team and Assistance Center) in an emergency.

The “Go Team,” which is a special team that iswill be dispatched in the case of an emergency to emergencies involving LAN aircraft. The Go Team includes a director, a SAT leader, a field investigation team (FIT) leaderthe city nearest to the site where the emergency or accident has occurred and other representatives fromassume the general support, anresponsibility of emergency management in such place with the following areas: Humanitarian Assistance (APF Team), Investigation (Field Investigation team), General Support (Logistics, Informatics & Telecommunication, (IT) team,Security, Finance, Legal and security, finance, legal and maintenance departments.Maintenance departments), Aircraft Recovery (Recovery Team).

Logistic Area. It is activated and deployed in our head quarters and at the location of the accident.

Safety and Security Audit Management

The Safety and Security Audit Management reports directly to the Corporate Director. This area has the mission to advise senior management on issues relating to planning and control, design, documentation, implementation, maintenance and improvement of the SMS of LANLAN’s Safety and its subsidiaries.

FunctionsQuality Management System. The Safety and ResponsibilitiesSecurity Audit Management is responsible for:

 

AdministrationThe administration of Internal Evaluation Program byinternal evaluation programs and conducting organization-wide audits in all operational areas.

 

Advise to senior management regardingEstablishing the fulfillment of IOSA and ISAGO standards.Training and Qualification Auditors Procedures.

Report to senior management the status of the SMS and Corporate Quality Management Area.

Coordination ofCoordinating the implementation of the IOSA and ISAGO external audits with the Audit Organization.

Participation in the ISAGO IATA Audit Pool.

Creation of guidelines for the quality assurance of the operational areas of Lan Airlines, Lan Express and Lan Cargo, and quality coordinators of the LAN subsidiaries.

Implementation of the Internal Audit Plan and ISAGO and IOSA audits, including operational processes relating to safety and security, quality objectives, status of corrective and prevented actions, and customer complains.complains, and advising senior management regarding the fulfillment of IOSA and ISAGO standards.

Reporting on the status of the Safety and Quality Management System to senior management throughout the audits.

Creating guidelines for the quality assurance of the operational areas of LAN, LAN Express and LAN Cargo, and quality coordinators.

 

Coordination of corrective and preventive actions arising from the implementation of the SMSSafety and corporate quality.

Establishing the IOSA and ISAGO Training and Qualification Auditors Procedure.quality management system.

 

Establishing a corporate system to evaluate and control the external suppliers, in case of outsourcing services.

Safety and Occupational Health Management

The main objective of the Safety and Occupational Health Management is to ensure the safety and health of workers at work, by advising, managing and helping the company prevent occupational accidents and diseases through the identification and control of occupational hazards and medical surveillance.

The forgoing objectives are satisfied through a dedicated team of professionals (engineers, doctors, risk prevention experts and paramedics), who constantly develop activities aimed at protecting LAN employees.

Functionsemployees and Responsibilitiesis responsible for:

 

Implementation and control of the preventive management systems.

 

Development of training programs.

 

Promotion and dissemination of safety and occupational guidelines,

Assessment of risk of work place.

Medical assistance to all injured employees.

Investigation of all accidents.

Preemployment medical assessment.

Compliance with legal regulations regarding occupational health, safety and environmental issues.issues and the promotion and dissemination of safety and occupational guidelines.

 

CheckingAssessment of risk of work place and monitoring of emergency systems.

Medical assistance to all injured employees and investigation of all accidents.

TAM’s Safety and Security Corporate Direction

The Safety & Security Direction is an internal division in charge of the management of safety and security matters related to flight operations, operative and administrative buildings, organization and coordination of emergency systems installedresponse matters, safety and security audits and safety and occupational health.

Safety Management

We have uniform safety standards and safety-related training programs that cover all of TAM’s operations. TAM has implemented a Safety and Quality Management System (“SMS”) throughout the operational areas its operations, which is IOSA certified. The SMS provides clear definitions of the functions and responsibilities regarding operational safety for all persons involved, from the top to the bottom of the operational structure of the airline. It strengthens the commitment and knowledge required from everyone in the facilities.Company regarding any and all actions that could affect safety.

The Safety & Security Director is responsible for the Operational Safety Oversight and the implementation of the SMS. The Safety & Security Director supervises a staff of approximately three hundred twenty-nine employers the different backgrounds, including pilots, aeronautical engineers, aircraft maintenance engineers, psychologist, dangerous goods, auditors, security agents, and ground handling safety specialists (Operational Safety & Security, Aerospace Health and Safety Labor. The Safety & Security Director is also responsible for setting procedure standard for measuring the quality and safety of services provided by companies or professional contractors that affect the operational safety of this organization.

Other programs for safety management include:

Human Factors Program: This program provides the support for the integration of human factors with operational areas, and identifies for each alternative the full range of human factors and interfaces (e.g., cognitive, organizational, physical, functional, environmental, social and behavioral sciences) necessary to achieve an acceptable level of performance for operating, maintaining and supporting the safety system.

Safety Communication: This sector has a responsibility to produce, evaluate, analyze and publish all documents and internal campaigns in operational safety within TAM, for operational and administrative employees, according to regulatory rules of ANAC (National Civil Aviation Agency—Brazil), CENIPA (Aeronautical Accident Investigation and Prevention Center) and SMS (Safety Management Systems).

Aerospace Health Department: The Aeroespace Health Department is responsible for the health of passengers and employees. TAM is responsible for carrying its passengers safely and efficiently to the destination. The medical department is responsible for ensuring, as far as possible, that passenger health does not deteriorate during the journey, and that there are adequate measures in place to deal with any unforeseen in-flight medical emergency.

Safety Assurance, Safety Audit Manager and Dangerous Goods

Safety Audit establishes guidelines and principles to be applied in Audit Program Operating to identify whether activities related to operations are in accordance with established procedures in operating manuals, meeting the needs and operational standards set forth in applicable laws or to check for hazards operation, latent conditions or undesirable areas needing improvement by ISO 9001:2008, 19011:2002, IOSA and ISAGO.

Safety Assurance consolidates risks operational through the creation and monitoring processes to integrate information from failures and shortcomings of the company with audit programs, monitoring and data analysis through the parameterization of the systems and Hyperion AQD for Security System.

Dangerous Goods coordinates the administrative and operational activities of the board of operational safety with regard to the carriage of dangerous goods by integrating with other areas of the board and managers and assisting the director of operational safety in decision making.

Functions and Responsibilities

Administration AQD system and Hyperion system (Safety Indicators);

Monitors all current information on regulation and requirements related operational safety;

Create and maintain processes to integrate information gaps and deficiencies that compromise the company’s Operational Safety by type of operation and management through indicators computed monthly basis and control system in accordance with the Standard Performance Indicators of Operational Safety TAM;

Administration of Internal Evaluation Program by conducting organization-wide audits in all operational areas;

Providing resources, processes and training teams to conduct risk analysis programs operating in hazard identification TAM;

Ensure that the data recorded in the system AQD and Hyperion are reliable through constant surveillance data, process established in the Manual of Operational Safety Management TAM and Operational Safety Board;

Perform monthly, quarterly and annual Operational Safety Board to TAM Operational Safety, Operational Divisions and operational managers through the process of monitoring and control systems together with the Operational Safety Commission;

Ensuring the maintenance of IOSA recertification audit of TAM Airlines providing resources, hiring an accredited Audit Organization for IATA to conduct recertification audits;

Coordination of the implementation of the IOSA and ISAGO external audits with the Audit Organization;

Coordination of guidelines for the quality assurance of the operational areas of TAM Airlines, TAM Mercosur e TAM MRO;

Implementation of the Internal Audit Plan, IOSA and ISAGO audits including operational processes related to safety and security, quality objectives, status of corrective and prevented actions, and customer complains;

Implementation of the SMS to TAM Airlines, TAM Mercosur and TAM MRO;

Training and Qualification Auditors Procedure;

Coordinate the investigation of accidents involving Dangerous Goods;

Report on ANAC incident Dangerous Goods—NIAP;

Perform maintenance of the contents of the Manual of Dangerous Goods—MAP;

Provide guidance and audit processes load;

Treat reports (ASR) system AQD involving Dangerous Goods;

Develop recommendations regarding security procedure with Dangerous Goods;

Prepare bulletins warning about occurrences with Dangerous Goods and general cargo.

Security Management Manager

The main policy and the essential principle of security management is to ensure an adequate security protection for all TAM’s flights, aircraft, passengers, crew members, ground personnel, airport facilities and other services related to the commercial civil aviation against any threat or unlawful action.TAM has implemented corporate policies and a quality management system through the operational system to detect any lack of security in its operations. Audits and assessments are used to assign different levels of security to international and domestic operations.

The Corporate Security Manager (“CSM”) has the responsibility to evaluate, analyze and assign threat levels (high, medium, low) to international and domestic operations, and to propose security procedures for each scenario. The CSM is responsible for managing and coordinating security processes, procedures, measures and controls in accordance with the requirements described in the National Civil Aviation Security Programme, and participating in the development, implementation and continuous improvement of Airport Contingency Plans where TAM operations are conducted.

The Corporate Security Organization has four main areas:

Airport Security: This area has as its main goal to protect the organization against acts of unlawful interference. This team is formed by Supervisors and Security Agents (Document Screeners/AVSEC Security Agents) based at Guarulhos (GRU), Galeão (GIG), Manaus (MAO), Brasília (BSB) and Confins (CNF). The Corporate Security Department provides all resources necessary for maintenance of the security level appropriate to every international and domestic operations, working, cooperation and partnership basis with all other members of the Civil Aviation Security System, aiming solely to minimize threat risks in the company.

Corporate Risks: This area is responsible for conducting fraud investigations, risk prevention and background checks.

Property Security: This area is responsible for ensuring appropriate property security and access control for all TAM facilities, including TAM Cargo warehouses.

Security Training: This area is responsible for guaranteeing that all TAM members and representatives are properly trained in all matters required by Brazilian and International regulators.

The Corporate Security Department has been developing and implementing the Airline Security Programme (PSEA) in accordance with local and international regulators, which includes the following:

Processes & Procedures for domestic and international operations;

Corporate Security Training Program, which includes the contents and definitions regarding security training for all areas involved in acceptance of aircraft, baggage, cargo and passengers;

Airport Security Inspection Program. It has the contents and definitions regarding airport inspections and identification of security issues and corrective action plans for non-compliance.

Emergency Response Management Manager

The emergency response area is responsible for the administration of the Emergency Response Plan (ERP). It has been developed for the effective management of accidents and serious incidents with the purpose of mitigating any impacts on the passenger and their relatives and the operations.

The ERP consists mainly of:

Emergency Procedures. TAM has established a strong documented response to an adverse operational event that would force it to implement the various corporate resources that will be required to minimize the impact on the organization and deal with human impact with empathy and compassion. TAM has documented its corporate response procedures in an Emergency Response Manual and keeps the knowledge widely disclosed and special trained teams in the Company, approved by the ANAC (National Aviation Civil Agency) in accordance with IAC 200-1001 (ANAC), international requirements and considering industry best practices.

Facilities: The Emergency Response Center (ERC) includes three principal areas: the Executive Committee, the Crisis Management Committee (CMC) and the Public Relations Monitoring Area, each of which are located in São Paulo, Brazil.

Station Response: According to IAC 200-1001, each TAM Station has its Local Emergency Plan and it will coordinate the assistance to victims and families with the CMC in Sao Paolo. The Stations Manager will coordinate with Airport Authority to provide a private and secure area for the temporary assembly of family members and a different private and secure area for the assembly of uninjured passengers.

Assistance: TAM’s provide assistance to survivors and family members at the site in the immediate aftermath of an aircraft accident or incident. The Family Assistance Center (FAC) will be establishing at community closest to the site of the accident or incident. Ground casualties and their families will be provided with the same services that are being provided to survivors and the families of passengers.

Special Assistance Team (SAT). We have a humanitarian assistance program that we deploy for family and passenger assistance. We have about 2,150 total active volunteers distributed as follows: Sao Paulo (700 volunteers), Brazil – stations Portuguese (1082 volunteers), South America—stations Spanish (223 volunteers), US (66 volunteers), and Europe (87 volunteers). Our SAT is complemented by service vendors.

Go Team. We have a special team that will be deployed right after an occurrence involving passengers, crew or third parties affect by an occurrence involving TAM aircraft. The Go Team includes a director, a SAT leader, a field investigation team (FIT) leader and other representatives from the general support, as Informatics & Telecommunication (IT) team, and security, finance, legal and maintenance departments.

Telephone Enquiry Center. Our telephone enquiry center is located in São Paulo, Brazil, at our call-center office and has 630 agents in Sao Paulo and 150 agents in Buenos Aires. There are 180 lines available to establish a toll free number only for family members and victims in Brazil. The number will be published at TAM’s Dark Site and by the media, and can be activated in 60 minutes in case of emergencies. Our Contact Center is complemented by service vendors to establish international toll free number with the capacity to handle 3,000 calls per hour and capability for translation of over 140 languages.

Notification to families: In accordance with IAC 200-1001 (Brazil), TAM is responsible for notifying families within 3 hours aftermath of an aircraft accident or incident. Where the local government assumes the responsibility for the initial contact with the family of a passenger, TAM carrier will be responsible for the interface with the government agency involved.

Logistic Area. Immediately after an accident or a serious incident the CMC will deploy the Family Assistance Team to assist families and victims to establish a Family Assistance Center (FAC) in a hotel or similar near to the crash site. In order to support logistics issues with various sources of communications with the families and victims, TAM will also establish a Family Assistance Back Office in Sao Paolo and they will be in charge of logistics management in cooperation with FAC.

Personnel Effects: TAM has contract with service vendor to provide property recovery and restoration, and disaster mortuary services.

Aircraft Recovery: TAM has used the Recovery Kit since 2008, which is certificated by International Airlines Technical Poll (IATP). The agreement signed with the IATP provides that all member airlines may use the TAM´s equipment and staff in the region. The equipment is applied to any type of aircraft (including A380).

Flight Data Monitoring

The Flight Data Monitoring Area is responsible for the maintenance and administration of recorded flight data and safety-related databases and software.

Flight Operations Quality Assurance—“FOQA”

Since May 2002, TAM has utilized a Flight Data Monitoring (“FDM”) program. The FDM program is fully developed for the A320-Family Aircraft, A330, Boeing B767 and B777 fleet. The statistical information obtained produces recommended standard operational procedure changes and other safety-related measures. We have started the development of a maintenance variation for the same aircraft types which will monitor the engines, flight controls and general performance of the airplanes.

Maintenance Safety Coordinator

The Maintenance Safety Area oversees our maintenance safety measures and investigates maintenance-related incidents using the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (“MEDA”) methodology.

Cabin Safety Coordinator

The cabin safety area coordinator is responsible for managing the safety of aircraft cabins, cabin safety investigations, cabin passengers and flight attendants.

Investigation & Safety Information Management Coordinator

All information regarding safety-related incidents is entered into dedicated software, where it is analyzed according to potential risk. Important incidents are investigated thoroughly. Each particular incident requiring corrective actions is addressed accordingly with the assistance of the corporate operational safety directory.

ASR—Aviation Safety Report Coordinator

The Aviation Safety Report (“ASR”), catalogues all confidential safety reports submitted by employees of the company. The ASR is an important tool for accident prevention. The management of the ASR system through the Aviation Quality Database (“AQD”) allows for the sharing of information and facilitates corrective actions by the Company). This system includes features to classify risk reports for management.

All ASR reporting is subjected to the following basic process within the AQD:

Analysis of facts and risks involved;

Issue relevant to the sector analysis and response;

Issuance of Note—Recommendation and / or Safety Bulletin;

Response to the author (if identified) attaching a copy of the ASR process.

Mandatory Occurrence and Mandatory Reports Coordinator

The Authority Operational Policy manual defines the incidents and occurrences that require mandatory reporting. Those reports are created by the Safety Department of the Company.

LOSA—Line Operations Safety Audit Coordinator

This program was recognized by the International Civil Aviation Organization (“ICAO”) ( and National Civil Aviation Agency—Brazil (“ANAC”) as a necessary tool to protect passengers and employees.

The implementation of this program has been used to improve flight safety in the Company, by recording behaviors observed during normal flights for experienced pilots and through the preparation of a mandatory checklist (form) developed by experienced pilots familiar with the program. Observations by the Threat and Error Management (“TEM”) may even propose appropriate changes to the system and processes.

MAS—Maintenance Assessment Survey Coordinator

This program is similar to the LOSA program, applied to the mechanics of the aircraft, following a methodology known as the Maintenance Climate Assessment Survey (“MCAS”) which is utilized by the Department of Defense (United States Government), as in other Brazilian and international airlines, with the goal of improving processes and system based on assessments of human behavior in maintenance activities.

Airport infrastructure, Air traffic control and Ground Handling Coordinator

This area of the Company is responsible for identifying and analyzing risks related to Airports, and ATC and Ground handling. This area of the Company utilizes tools such as: Airport Surveys, ASR, FOQA Analysis, accident and Incident Investigations to develop ways to reduce risk to acceptable levels.

Other Safety and Security Procedures

In addition the specific policies discussed above, LATAM maintains various other internal divisions and employees specifically designated to manage safety planning and maintenance, investigation, data collection and reporting regarding safety related events.

Fuel Supplies

Fuel costs comprise the single largest category of our operating expenses. Over the last years, our fuel consumption and operating expenses have increased due to the significant growth in our operations and to the increase in fuel prices as a result of economic and political factors. In 2011, the foregoing trend was affected by geopolitical instability in the Middle East and the2012 pro forma total fuel costs represented 33.8%36.3% of our total pro forma operating expenses. The into-wing (fuel(average fuel price plus taxes and transportation costs) 2011 average final price for 2012, on a pro forma basis, was US$3.113.69 per gallon, representing a 34.2%9.7% increase from the 2010 average.2011 pro forma average fuel price. We can neither control nor accurately predict the volatility of fuel prices. Despite the foregoing, it is possible to partially offset the price volatility risk through our hedging and fuel surcharge programs in place in both our passenger and cargo business. For more information, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Risk of Fluctuations in Jet Fuel Prices”.Prices.”

The following table details our consolidated fuel consumption and operating costsexpenses (which exclude fuel costs related to charter operations in whichbecause fuel expenses are covered by the entity that charters the flight) during the last three years.

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31,(1) 
  2011 2010 2009   2012
LATAM
(Pro forma)
 2011
LATAM
(Pro forma)
 2010
LAN
(Actual)
 

Fuel consumption (thousands of gallons)

   562,346.0    501,098.2    452,708.5     1,295,099.9    1,261,045.4    501,098.2  

ATKs (millions)

   10,056.1    8,968.8    7,811.8  

Fuel consumption (thousands of gallons) per ATKs (millions)

   55.9    55.9    58.0  

ASKs Equivalent (millions)

   212,932.4    207,444.2    91,078.4  

Fuel consumption (thousands of gallons) per ASK Equivalent (millions)

   60.8    60.8    55.0  

Total fuel costs (US$ thousands)

   1,750,052    1,161,927    959,608     4,780,289    4,244,817    1,161,927  

Cost per gallon (US$)

   3.11    2.32    2.12     3.69    3.37    2.32  

Total fuel costs as a percentage of total operating costs

   33.79  29.79  29.80

Total fuel costs as a percentage of total operating expenses

   36.26  34.51  29.79

(1)

Information provided for the Company as of December 31, 2010 includes LAN Cargo operations, but do not include operating statistics of TAM for such period. Information provided for the Company as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 has been presented on a pro forma basis and includes pro forma operating statistics for LAN and TAM’s respective cargo operations during such periods. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—LATAM Airlines Group Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2012 (Pro forma) compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (Pro forma)” for our pro forma operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 which totaled US$13,005.7 million and $13,028.3 million, respectively.

Our fuel supply arrangements vary by airport and are distributed on 26 providers, but are mainly concentrated in Brazil (46.3%), Chile (12.4%) and Perú (8.3%). During 2012, we negotiated our fuel supply in several major European, North American and South American airports, including Brazil. We have entered intorenegotiated our entire fuel contracts to serve operations to more than sixty internationalsupply in Brazil and domestic destinations aroundclosed a long term contract with the world. Contractual termsmain suppliers in this market (Raizen 77% and conditions vary for each location depending on market conditions, logistics network, volume, economicPetrobras 33%). We also signed a long term contract with Terpel in Colombia and political factors, among others.a contract with Petroperú and Exxon in Lima. In 2010, approximately 24.7% ofNorth America our total fuel consumption was originated in Chilemain airports are Miami and New York, where we maintain a long-term commercial relationshipsigned contracts with a joint venture betweenWFS and Air BP respectively.In all of these negotiations, we used the joint volume of LATAM to capture benefits related to volume discounts and price alignments.

In others countries as Chile, Argentina, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, Uruguay, we continued working with our current suppliers (including Copec, YPF, Exxon, Shell, and where we have entered into specificPetroecuador) regarding our fuel supply contracts with Petrobras Aviationarrangements in these countries and Enex Aviation. We have more than twenty additional suppliers in our network such as Repsol YPF, Cepsa, Petroperu, Chevron, Air Total, Q8 Aviation and Exxon Mobil. In our secondary hubs we have the following fuel suppliers: WFS (Miami), Exxon Mobil and Petroperu (Lima), Exxon Mobil, Repsol YPF and Shell (Buenos Aires) and PetroEcuador (Guayaquil).many of these supply agreements will be negotiated during 2013.

Ground Facilities and Services

Our main operations are based at the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport in Santiago, Chile. We also operate from various other airports in Chile and abroad. We operate hangars, aircraft parking and other airport service facilities at the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport and other airports throughout Chile pursuant to concessions granted by the DGAC. We also maintain one customs warehouse at the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport, additional customs warehouses in Chile (Iquique, Antofagasta and Punta Arenas) and Argentina (Aeroparque) and operate cargo warehouses at the Miami International Airport to service our cargo customers. Our facilities at Miami International Airport include corporate offices for our cargo and passenger operations and temperature-controlled and freezer space for imports and exports.

We have VIP loungesalso operate significant ground facilities and services through TAM’s headquarters located at the Comodoro Arturo Merino BenítezCongonhas International Airport. The 7,500 square feet Neruda lounge, which represented an investment of approximately US$550,000Airport in 2001, has been widely acclaimed.São Paulo, Brazil. In 2005,Latin Trade magazine selected it as the “Best Airline Lounge” in Latin America. In the same airport2013, we also have the 4,300 square feet Mistral lounge.will inaugurate two new facilities for ground handling equipment maintenance and repair at São Paulo’s Guarulhos Airport with 9,000 m² and at Rio de Janeiro’s Galeão Airport with 4,000 m².

Finally, we incur certain airport usage fees and other charges for services performed by the various airports where we operate, such as air traffic control charges, take-off and landing fees, aircraft parking fees and fees payable in connection with the use of passenger waiting rooms and check-in counter space.

During 2010, APV’s (“In-flight Service Supplier”) new 1,650 square meter facilities were completed in the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benitez International Airport.

The development of the new building for the facilities of Andes Airports Services (“Andes,” which performs ground handling services) is in process which is scheduled to be delivered during the second half of 2012.

Ancillary Airline Activities

In addition to our airline operations, we generate revenues from a variety of other activities. In 2011, LAN generated other revenues of US$132.8 million from ancillary activities.

Our totalactivities, including revenue from aircraft leases (including subleases, dry-leases, wet-leases and capacity sales to certain alliance partners) and charter flights, amounted to US$12.7 million in 2011.

On January 25, 2011 Lan Cargo S.A. and Inversiones Lan S.A., subsidiaries of LAN Airlines, signed a promise to sell to Bethia S.A. (“Bethia”) 100% of the capital in the LAN subsidiaries Blue Express Intl. Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Blue Express S.A. (together referred to as “Blue Express”), companies engaged in ground courier services, operating brands and certain computer programs.

The price stated in the promissory contract was US$54 million subject to any adjustments that might arise as a result of a due diligence to be conducted by Bethia. The transaction closed on April 6, 2011, with the execution by Lan Cargo S.A. e Inversiones Lan S.A. as sellers, and Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Inversiones Betmin SpA (subsidiaries of Bethia) as purchasers, of the respective contracts for the sale of 100% of the social capital of Blue Express in the terms agreed in the purchase promise. The final sale value of Blue Express was US$53.5 million. Since Blue Express’ book value was US$9.1 million, the sale generated a non-operational profit of approximately US$44.5 million, which was reflected on LAN’s 2011 results.

As a consequence of the sale of Blue Express in 2011, the Company’s courier business revenues fell from US$36.8 million in 2010 to US$11.0 million in 2011.

During 2011, we had revenues of US$44.0 million from tours, and US$16.9 million forfrom duty-free in-flight sales. The balance of our operating revenues, US$48.3 million in 2011, was generated bysales, from other maintenance, storage and customs, handling and others.activities and, since June 23, 2012, revenues of Multiplus. In 2012, LATAM generated other revenues of US$220.2 million from ancillary activities.

Insurance

We carry hullmaintain insurance thatpolicies as required by law and in accordance with the terms of all aircraft leasing agreements which LATAM and their affiliates and subsidiaries may own or we are responsible for or operate, including TAM and its affiliates and subsidiaries. The scope of these policies includes among otherall risk coverage “all risk,”for aircraft hulls, including war risks and allied risks, spares andthird party legal liability for passengers, cargo, mail, baggage and injuries to third parties. We renew our insurance coverage yearly,parties on the ground. Our current policies, which are in force through April 1, 2013 and are subject to deductibles that vary depending onrenewed annually, follow the coverage type andbest practices adopted by the loss type. Our deductibles are US$1,250 for loss or damage per occurrence associated with passengers’ baggage liabilities, US$10,000 per occurrence for loss or damage associated with cargo liabilities and between US$500,000 and US$1.0 million per occurrence for hull “all risk” insurance (depending on the aircraft type). Additionally, we have hull deductible coverage to reduce the net hull deductible to US$100,000 per occurrence (aircraft and/or engine).international civil aviation industry.

Since December 2006, weWe have negotiated common terms for Hull All Risk, Aviation Legal Liabilities and Spares coverage, together with BritishIAG Group (British Airways, Aer LingusIberia and their affiliates and franchisesfranchises), which allows us to obtain premium reductions and coverage improvements. In April 2011, Iberia, Air NostrumWe also maintain insurance in respect of the assets against the risk of theft, fire, flood, electrical damage and Vueling also joined to such group.

Oursimilar events for equipment and buildings we own or for which we are responsible, including airport areas where we have operations. Similarly, we have contracted for vehicle insurance coverage has a one-year term starting in Aprilagainst the risk of each year. The aggregate cost of our insurance coveragerobbery, theft, fire and civil liability against third parties for the 2011 calendar year was US$16.3 million, excluding insurance relating to Aires,all vehicles we own or for which represents a 4.6% increase in insurance expenses and a 17.2% decrease in average insurance rates compared to the 2010 calendar year.

Aires was covered under a separate insurance policy until October 1, 2011, when it was integrated under LAN’s policy. Its annual cost was US$7.9 million (US$7.3 million from January to October and US$0.6 million from October to December).we are responsible.

Information Technology

General

We use information technology in almost every aspect of our business.

Passenger Service System

Our reservations, departure control (check-in), inventory, flight planning and baggage tracing systems (“Passenger Service Systems, or “PSS”) are operated by Amadeus, Sabre, Iberia and SITA, and we operate our internal systems from two data center facilities in Santiago, Chile. In 2006, we implemented a Disaster Recovery Plan between those two sites in order to ensure the functionality of our critical systems, with a recovery time objective of four days. The line of business infrastructure currently has an average recovery time of two hours for 80% of our systems and two days for the remaining 20%. In 2012, we completed a significant “HOST” change from multiple legacy applications to implement a single supplier (Sabre) for our PSS, which contains the reservation, inventory and departure controls for LATAM Airlines Group.

Third-party suppliers provide us with the following technical infrastructure elements:

 

wide-area data network (provided mainly by SITA and Telefónica); and

 

data centers and desktop operations and support (provided by Accenture and IBM)HP).

Basic Infrastructure Operation

Since early 2010, we have outsourced our IT infrastructure with Accenture and IBM worldwide. During 2011 IBM managed the data center and Accenture handled our desktop equipment. In 2012 we will change the manager of our data center from IBM to HP. This outsourcing allows us to:

 

deliver a standard world-class service;

 

increase the efficiency of our IT operations;

 

convert fixed costs into variable costs;

 

guarantee that the service standards (such as up-time and response time) required by critical processes of our business are fulfilled;

 

accelerate critical infrastructure projects while significantly reducing the resources required;

 

increase the efficiency of our personnel; and

 

focus internal IT efforts on business functions, rather than basic hardware and software issues.

Between 2010 and 2012, LAN upgraded its IT platform and optimized its solution for contingencies in case of a disaster.

Telecommunications

We have used the latest technology available with regard to our global telecommunications network. Our network has the capacity to transport voice, data, and video with the quality required by the Company, combining traditional private data channels with virtual private networks through the Internet.

Front-End Systems

During 2002, we deployed new systems to support our sales personnel. These systems provide the employees who have a direct contact with our customers with additional tools to improve service, enhance customer information and increase efficiency. During 2004 and 2005, we implemented these systems at our airport counters and our call centers.

Since 2005, we have favoredWe employ a strategy of encouraging and facilitating self self—service alternatives for customers, through improving the functionality of the www.lan.com website as well as implementing self check-in kiosks in airports.

During 2009, we deployed a new online system in order to provide the processes that our engineering, maintenance and materials areas develop, with technological solutions. This project has allowed us to establish and automate simple and integrated processes, standardize processes for the Company (including our subsidiaries and related

companies), facilitate handling of materials and maintenance, make relevant information available in a full, unique and consistent way to all users, and optimize distribution and execution (planned and non planned), among other benefits.

Enterprise Resource Planning

In 2002, we purchased an enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system from SAP. This system, which was fully implemented in the second quarter of 2004 for Lan AirlinesLAN and almost all of its subsidiaries. This ERP systemsubsidiaries, includes modules covering areas such as: finance, accounting, inventory management, human resources, business warehouse, as well as a user-friendly portal. We are currently working on optimizing and simplifying this system, and in leveraging it to increase the efficiency of our back-office processes.

Development and Maintenance System

With respect to new development needs, our first choice is to acquire existing packaged software, but we outsource this service when such software is not available in the market. Since early 2007, we have outsourced our IT system development to three principal vendors: TATA Consultancy Services, Everis, Accenture and Indra. Thanks

Business Initiatives

The purchase of Boeing 787 Dreamliners, Boeing’s most fuel efficient aircraft and the world’s first e-enabled airplane, has been a significant challenge for our technology processes since the airplane needs more connectivity to this outsourcing initiative,network, optimized hardware and software and constant support. LAN received its first Boeing 787 Dreamliner in September 2012.

Integration between LAN and TAM

Following the combination, we have achieved:are undertaking a project to unify the IT applications of LAN and TAM and to develop a plan to integrate LAN and TAM´s business processes and applications. The main focus was:

 

a decrease in project delays;evaluate LAN and TAM’s applications and processes

 

an increase in systems reliability; andalign IT strategy for LATAM

 

a shift indefine the efforts of the internal IT department to a more business oriented perspective.final application architecture for LATAM

New initiatives

We are implementing a new host (“Host”). A Host change is one of the most important decisions for the passenger business division indefine an airline in terms of processintegrated technical architecture and technology. It consists in replacing the PSS, or Passenger Service System, that contains the reservation, inventory and departure control systems of an airline. This decision permits the understanding of the software from an aviation industry provider in ASP mode, adherence to standard processes and best industry practices and the integration of multiple legacy applications that complement the needs of the processesinfrastructure as well as a model for business and technical applications maintenance

build the airline business. For LAN,action plan, including the implementation roadmap, its phases, investments and impact on the current projects.

As a result of this roadmap, LATAM will prioritize initiatives in 2013 that are most valuable for integrating IT operations, which include:

ERP: Finance, procurement, budget and planning, human resources and employee internal portal

Aircraft Maintenance system

Commercial area systems: Revenue Accounting, Revenue Management and BI Commercial

Operations management systems: To optimize flight route and crew schedule

Host change implies going from two suppliers (Amadeus and Resiber) currently covering the role of the complete PSS, to a single supplier (Sabre). This project representssystem strategy: To define LATAM’s host system

To implement these prioritized projects, we estimated an investment of approximately US$79.4 million, and is expected45.6 million.

In regards to provide immediate savings of 75% per passenger in reservation transaction costs and is estimated to be in place during June 2012.

The IT department expects to implement a Technology Refreshing Project between 2010 and 2012, to move to the platforms that will host our applications and services for the next five years. During 2010, Lan Airlines will define the Technology Refreshing Project and all the platforms, software, solutions and services that it will usecentral infrastructure, LATAM’s technical model was designed to support its business. These hardwarenot only the implementation of LATAM’s system applications but also the implementation of integrated datacenter and software solutionstelecommunications (data and voice) solutions. The integrated IT model will be gradually implemented between 2011 and 2012.

We are also buying new airplanes, namely, Boeing 787 aircraft. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is Boeing’s most fuel-efficient aircraft and is the world’s first e-Enabled commercial airplane.

The Boeing 787 combines the integrated information and communications systems to drive operational efficiency and streamline airplane maintenance. The e-Enabled tools on the 787 will be a significant change from any other commercial airplane previously operated. The extensive e-Enabling on the 787 increases the need for network connectivity, hardware and software improvements, and systems management practices.require investments of approximately US$13.6 million.

Regulation

Below is a brief reference to the material effects of aeronautical and other regulations in force in each of the relevant jurisdictions in which LAN and its subsidiaries operate.

Chile

Aeronautical Regulation

Both the DGAC and the JAC oversee and regulate the Chilean aviation industry. The DGAC reports directly to the Chilean Air Force and is responsible for supervising compliance with Chilean laws and regulations relating to air navigation. The JAC is the Chilean civil aviation authority. Primarily on the basis of Decree Law No. 2,564, which regulates commercial aviation, the JAC establishes the main commercial policies for the aviation industry in Chile, regulates the assignment of international routes, and the compliance with certain insurance requirements, and the DGAC regulates flight operations, including personnel, aircraft and security standards, air traffic control and airport management. We have obtained and maintain the necessary authority from the Chilean government to conduct flight operations, including authorization certificates from the JAC and technical operative certificates from the DGAC, the continuation of which is subject to the ongoing compliance with applicable statutes, rules and regulations pertaining to the airline industry, including any rules and regulations that may be adopted in the future.

Chile is a contracting state, as well as a permanent member, of the ICAO, an agency of the United Nations established in 1947 to assist in the planning and development of international air transport. The ICAO establishes technical standards for the international aviation industry, which Chilean authorities have incorporated into Chilean laws and regulations. In the absence of an applicable Chilean regulation concerning safety or maintenance, the DGAC has incorporated by reference the majority of the ICAO’s technical standards. We believe that we are in material compliance with all relevant technical standards.

Route Rights

Domestic Routes.Chilean airlines are not required to obtain permits in connection with carrying passengers or cargo on any domestic routes, but only to comply with the technical and insurance requirements established respectively by the DGAC and the JAC. There are no regulatory barriers that would prevent a foreign airline from creating a Chilean subsidiary and entering the Chilean domestic market using that subsidiary. On January 18, 2012 the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Economics of Chile announced steps towards unilaterally opening the Chilean domestic skies in the near term.

International Routes.As an airline providing services on international routes, Lan AirlinesLAN is also subject to a variety of bilateral civil air transport agreements that provide for the exchange of air traffic rights between Chile and various other countries. There can be no assurance that existing bilateral agreements between Chile and foreign governments will continue, and a modification, suspension or revocation of one or more bilateral treaties could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

International route rights, as well as the corresponding landing rights, are derived from a variety of air transport agreements negotiated between Chile and foreign governments. Under such agreements, the government of one country grants the government of another country the right to designate one or more of its domestic airlines to operate scheduled services to certain destinations of the former and, in certain cases, to further connect to third-country

destinations. In Chile, when additional route frequencies to and from foreign cities become available, any eligible airline may apply to obtain them. If there is more than one applicant for a route frequency the JAC awards it through a public auction for a period of five years. The JAC grants route frequencies subject to the condition that the recipient airline operate them on a permanent basis. If an airline fails to operate a route for a period of six months or more, the JAC may terminate its rights to that route. International route frequencies are freely transferable. In the past, we have generally paid only nominal amounts for international route frequencies obtained in uncontested auctions.

Airfare Pricing Policy.Chilean airlines are permitted to establish their own domestic and international fares without government regulation, as long as they do not abuse any dominant market position they may enjoy.regulation. For more information, see “–“—Antitrust Regulation” below. Airlines may file complaints before the Antitrust Court with respect to monopolistic or other pricing practices by other airlines that violate Chile’s antitrust laws. In 1997, the Antitrust Commission approved and imposed a specific self-regulatory fare plan for our domestic operations in Chile consistent with the Antitrust Commission’s directive to maintain a competitive environment. According to this plan, we must file notice with the JAC of any increase or decrease in standard fares on routes deemed “non-competitive” by the JAC and any decrease in fares on “competitive” routes at least twenty days in advance. We must file notice with the JAC of any increase in fares on “competitive” routes at least ten days in advance. In addition, the Chilean authorities now require that we justify any modification that we make to our fares on non-competitive routes. We must also ensure that our average yields on a non-competitive route are not higher than those on competitive routes of similar distance.

Registration of Aircraft.Aircraft registration in Chile is governed by the Chilean Aeronautical Code (“CAC”). In order to register or continue to be registered in Chile, an aircraft must be wholly owned by either:

 

a natural person who is a Chilean citizen; or

a legal entity incorporated in and having its domicile and principal place of business in Chile and a majority of the capital stock of which is owned by Chilean nationals, among other requirements established in article 38 of the CAC.

 

The Aeronautical Code expressly allows the DGAC to permit registration of aircraft belonging to non-Chilean individuals or entities with a permanent place of business in Chile. Aircraft owned by non-Chileans, but operated by Chileans or by an airline which is affiliated with a Chilean aviation entity, may also be registered in Chile. Registration of any aircraft can be cancelled if it is not in compliance with the requirements for registration and, in particular, if:

 

the ownership requirements are not met; or

 

the aircraft does not comply with any applicable safety requirements specified by the DGAC.

Safety.The DGAC requires that all aircraft operated by Chilean airlines be registered either with the DGAC or with an equivalent supervisory body in a country other than Chile. All aircraft must have a valid certificate of airworthiness issued by either the DGAC or an equivalent non-Chilean supervisory entity. In addition, the DGAC will not issue maintenance permits to a Chilean airline until the DGAC has assessed the airline’s maintenance capabilities. The DGAC renews maintenance permits annually, and has approved our maintenance operations. Only DGAC-certified maintenance facilities or facilities certified by an equivalent non-Chilean supervisory body in the country where the aircraft is registered may maintain and repair the aircraft operated by Chilean airlines. Aircraft maintenance personnel at such facilities must also be certified either by the DGAC or an equivalent non-Chilean supervisory body before assuming any aircraft maintenance positions.

Security.The DGAC establishes and supervises the implementation of security standards and regulations for the Chilean commercial aviation industry. Such standards and regulations are based on standards developed by international commercial aviation organizations. Each airline and airport in Chile must submit an aviation security handbook to the DGAC describing its security procedures for the day-to-day operations of commercial aviation and procedures for staff security training. Lan AirlinesLAN has submitted its aviation security handbook to the DGAC. Chilean airlines that operate international routes must also adopt security measures in accordance with the requirements of applicable bilateral international agreements.

Airport Policy.The DGAC supervises and manages airports in Chile, including the supervision of take-off and landing charges. The DGAC proposes airport charges, which are approved by the JAC and are the same at all airports. Since the mid-90s, a number of Chilean airports have been privatized, including the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport in Santiago. At the privatized airports, the airport administration manages the facilities under the supervision of the DGAC and JAC.

Environmental and Noise Regulation.There are no material environmental regulations or controls imposed upon airlines, applicable to aircraft, or that otherwise affect us in Chile, except for environmental laws and regulations of general applicability. There is no noise restriction regulation currently applicable to aircraft in Chile. However, Chilean authorities are planning to pass a noise-related regulation governing aircraft that fly to and within Chile. The proposed regulation will require all such aircraft to comply with certain noise restrictions, referred to in the market as Stage 3 standards. LAN’s fleet already complies with the proposed restrictions so we do not believe that enactment of the proposed standards would impose a material burden on us.

Argentina

Aeronautical Regulation

Both theAdministración Nacional de Aviación Civil (“ANACI”ANAC”) and the Secretary of Transport oversee and regulate the Argentinean aviation industry. ANACI regulates flight operations, including personnel, aircraft and security standards, air traffic control and airport management, and reports indirectly to the Ministry of Planning and is responsible for supervising compliance with Argentinean laws and regulations relating to air navigation. The Secretary of Transport also reports to the Ministry of Planning and regulates the assignment of international routes

and matters related to tariff regulation policies. We have obtained and maintain the necessary authorizations from the Argentinean government to conduct flight operations, including authorization certificates and technical operative certificates from ANACI, the continuation of which is subject to the ongoing compliance with applicable statutes, rules and regulations pertaining to the airline industry, including any rules and regulations that may be adopted in the future.

Argentina is a contracting state and a permanent member of the ICAO, an agency of the United Nations established in 1947 to assist in the planning and development of international air transport. The ICAO establishes technical standards for the international aviation industry, which Argentinean authorities have incorporated into Argentinean laws and regulations. In the absence of applicable Argentinean regulation concerning safety or maintenance, the ANACI has incorporated by reference the majority of the ICAO’s technical standards. We believe that we are in material compliance with all relevant technical standards.

Route Rights

Domestic Routes. In Argentina airlines are required to obtain permits in connection with carrying passengers or cargo on any domestic routes, and to comply with the technical requirements established by the local authority. There are no regulatory barriers preventing a foreign airline from creating an Argentine subsidiary and entering the Argentine domestic market using that subsidiary. However, ownership of such subsidiary by the foreign airline may not be direct, but through a subsidiary formed in Argentina, which in turn may be directly or indirectly owned by the foreign company. However, such subsidiary should operate Argentine registered aircraft and employ Argentine aeronautical personnel.

International Routes. As an airline providing services on international routes, LanLAN Argentina is also subject to a variety of bilateral civil air transport agreements that provide for the exchange of air traffic rights between Argentina and various other countries. There can be no assurance that existing bilateral agreements between Argentina and foreign governments will continue. Furthermore, a modification, suspension or revocation of one or more bilateral treaties could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

International route rights, as well as the corresponding landing rights, are derived from a variety of air transport agreements negotiated between Argentina and foreign governments. Under such agreements, the government of one country grants the government of another country the right to designate one or more of its domestic airlines to

operate scheduled services to certain destinations of the former and, in certain cases, to further connect to third-country destinations. In Argentina, when additional route frequencies to and from foreign cities become available, any eligible airline may apply to obtain them. ANACI grants route frequencies subject to the condition that the recipient airline operate them on a permanent basis. If an airline fails to operate a route for a period of six months or more, the ANACI may terminate its rights to that route.

Airfare Pricing Policy. Argentine airlines are permitted to establish their own international fares without government regulation, as long as they do not abuse any dominant market position they may enjoy. Yet, there are government-fixed maximum and minimum prices for domestic flights.

Registration of Aircraft. Aircraft registration in Argentina is governed by the Argentinean Aeronautical Code (“AAC”). In order to register or continue to be registered in Argentina, an aircraft must be wholly owned by either:

 

a natural person who is an Argentinean citizen; or

 

a legal entity incorporated in and having its domicile and principal place of business in Argentina and a majority of the capital stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by Argentinean nationals, among other requirements established in the AAC.

Safety.ANACI requires that all aircraft operated by Argentinean airlines be registered with ANACI. All aircraft must have a valid certificate of airworthiness issued by ANACI. In addition, ANACI will not issue maintenance permits to an Argentinean airline until ANACI has assessed the airline’s maintenance capabilities. ANACI renews maintenance permits periodically and approves maintenance operations once the airline initiates its operations and

each time an airline changes its maintenance regime. Only ANACI-certified maintenance facilities (in Argentina or in any other country) may maintain and repair the aircraft operated by Argentinean airlines. Aircraft maintenance personnel at such facilities must also be certified by ANACI before assuming any aircraft maintenance positions.

Security.ANACI establishes and supervises the implementation of security standards and regulations for the Argentinean commercial aviation industry. Such standards and regulations are based on standards developed by international commercial aviation organizations. Each airline and airport in Argentina must submit an aviation security handbook to ANACI describing its security procedures for the day-to-day operations of commercial aviation and procedures for staff security training. LanLAN Argentina has submitted its aviation security handbook to ANACI. Argentinean airlines that operate international routes must also adopt security measures in accordance with the requirements of applicable bilateral international agreements.

Airport Policy.The ORSNA (Organismo Regulador del Sistema Nacional de Aeropuertos) supervises and manages the airports in Argentina, including the supervision of take-off and landing charges. The ORSNA proposes airport charges, which are approved by ANACI and are the same at all airports. Nevertheless, while domestic flights are charged in local currency, international flights are charged in U.S. dollars. Since the late-90s, a number of Argentinean airports have been privatized, including Aeroparque and Aeropuerto Internacional de Ezeiza Ministro Pistarini in Buenos Aires, the two most important airports in Argentina. At the privatized airports, the airport administration manages the facilities under the supervision of ANACI and ORSNA.

Environmental and Noise Regulation.There are no material environmental regulations or controls imposed upon airlines, applicable to aircraft, or that otherwise affect us in Argentina, except for environmental laws and regulations of general applicability and noise restriction regulation currently applicable to aircraft in Argentina. Any aircraft operated by an Argentinean airline should comply with certain noise restrictions, specifically with Stage 3 standards, as set forth in chapter 91.805 of the Argentinean civilian aviation regulations (Regulaciones Argentinas de Aviación Civil) referred to in the market as Stage 3 standards. LAN’s fleet already complies with the proposed restrictions so we do not believe that enactment of the proposed standards would impose a material burden on us.

Peru

Aeronautical Regulation

The Peruvian DGAC (“PDGAC”) oversees and regulates the Peruvian aviation industry. The PDGAC reports directly to the Ministry of Transportation and Communications and is responsible for supervising compliance with Peruvian laws and regulations relating to air navigation. In addition, the PDGAC regulates the assignment of national and international routes, and the compliance with certain insurance requirements, and it regulates flight operations, including personnel, aircraft and security standards, air traffic control and airport management. We have obtained and maintain the necessary authorizations from the Peruvian government to conduct flight operations, including authorization and technical operative certificates, the continuation of which is subject to the ongoing compliance with applicable statutes, rules and regulations pertaining to the airline industry, including any rules and regulations that may be adopted in the future.

Peru is a contracting state and a permanent member of the ICAO. The ICAO establishes technical standards for the international aviation industry, which Peruvian authorities have incorporated into Peruvian laws and regulations. In the absence of an applicable Peruvian regulation concerning safety or maintenance, the PDGAC has incorporated by reference the majority of the ICAO’s technical standards. We believe that we are in material compliance with all relevant technical standards.

Route Rights

Domestic Routes.Peruvian airlines are required to obtain permits in connection with carrying passengers or cargo on any domestic routes and to comply with the technical requirements established by the PDGAC. Non-Peruvian airlines are not permitted to provide domestic air service between destinations in Peru.

International Routes.As an airline providing services on international routes, LanLAN Peru is also subject to a variety of bilateral civil air transport agreements that provide for the exchange of air traffic rights between Peru and various other countries. There can be no assurance that existing bilateral agreements between Peru and foreign governments will continue, and a modification, suspension or revocation of one or more bilateral treaties could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

International route rights, as well as the corresponding landing rights, are derived from a variety of air transport agreements negotiated between Peru and foreign governments. Under such agreements, the government of one country grants the government of another country the right to designate one or more of its domestic airlines to operate scheduled services to certain destinations of the former and, in certain cases, to further connect to third-country destinations. In Peru, when additional route frequencies to and from foreign cities become available, any eligible airline may apply to obtain them. If there is more than one applicant for a route frequency the PDGAC awards it through a public auction for a period of four years. The PDGAC grants route frequencies subject to the condition that the recipient airline operate them on a permanent basis. If an airline fails to operate a route for a period of 90 days or more, the PDGAC may terminate its rights to that route, although that has never happened in practice.

Airfare Pricing Policy.Peruvian airlines are permitted to establish their own domestic and international fares without government regulation, as long as they do not abuse any dominant market position they may enjoy. For more information, see “–“—Antitrust Regulation” below. Airlines or other interested parties may file complaints before the Institute for Protection of Fair Competition and Consumer Rights (“Indecopi”) with respect to monopolistic or other pricing practices by other airlines that violate Peru’s antitrust laws.

Registration of Aircraft.Aircraft registration in Peru is governed by the Peruvian Civil Aviation Law. In order to own and register a Peruvian aircraft, the following conditions shall apply:

 

In case of a natural person, the owner shall be a Peruvian citizen; or in case of a foreign person, the owner shall be permanently domiciled in Peru; or

In case of a legal entity, it shall be incorporated in and having its domicile and principal place of business in Peru among other requirements established in article 47 of the Peruvian Civil Aviation Law.

 

Aircraft owned by non-Peruvians citizens or entities with domicile in Peru may also be registered in Peru but only if the aircraft is used for general, not commercial aviation. Registration of any aircraft can be cancelled if it is not in compliance with the requirements for registration mentioned above and, in particular, if the aircraft does not comply with any applicable safety requirements specified by the PDGAC.

Safety. Peruvian law allows the use of aircraft that are registered either with the PDGAC or with an equivalent supervisory body in a country other than Peru. All aircraft must have a valid certificate of airworthiness issued by either the PDGAC or an equivalent non-Peruvian supervisory entity. In addition, the PDGAC will issue maintenance permits to a Peruvian airline as long as the PDGAC has assessed the airline’s maintenance capabilities. The PDGAC has approved our maintenance operations. Only PDGAC-certified maintenance facilities or facilities certified by an equivalent non-Peruvian supervisory body in the country where the aircraft is registered may maintain and repair the aircraft operated by Peruvian airlines. Aircraft maintenance personnel at such facilities must also be certified either by the PDGAC or an equivalent non-Peruvian supervisory body before be appointed to any aircraft maintenance positions.

Security.The PDGAC establishes and supervises the implementation of security standards and regulations for the Peruvian commercial aviation industry. Such standards and regulations are based on standards developed by international commercial aviation organizations. Each airline and airport in Peru must submit an aviation security handbook to the PDGAC describing its security procedures for the day-to-day operations of commercial aviation and procedures for staff security training. LanLAN Peru has submitted its aviation security handbook to the PDGAC. Peruvian airlines that operate international routes must also adopt security measures in accordance with the requirements of applicable bilateral international agreements.

Airport Policy. CORPAC supervises and manages airports in Peru, including the supervision of take-off and landing charges. CORPAC sets airport charges for navigation facilities, which may differ from airport to airport. Since the mid-90s, a number of Peruvian airports have been privatized, including the Aeropuerto Internacional Jorge Chávez in Lima. At the privatized airports, the airport administration manages the facilities under the supervision of theOrganismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Infraestructura de Transporte de Uso Público, (the Supervising Agency of Investment in Public Transport Infrastructure Facilities or “OSITRAN”), an independent regulatory and supervising entity.

Environmental and Noise Regulation.There are no specific material environmental regulations or controls imposed upon airlines, applicable to aircraft, or that otherwise materially affect us in Peru, except for environmental laws and regulations of general applicability. There are noise restriction regulations currently applicable to aircraft in Peru. LAN’s fleet complies with the proposed restrictions so they do not impose a material burden on us.

Ecuador

Aeronautical Regulation

There are two institutions that control commercial aviation on behalf of the State: (i) The National Civil Aviation Board (“CNAC”), which directs aviation policy; and (ii) the General Civil Aviation Bureau (“EDGAC”), which is a technical regulatory and control agency. The CNAC issues operating permits and grants operating concessions to national and international airlines. It also issues opinions on bilateral and multilateral air transportation treaties, allocates routes and traffic rights, and approves joint operating agreements such as wet leases and shared codes.

Fundamentally, the EDGAC is responsible for:

 

ensuring that the national standards and technical regulations and international ICAO standards and regulations are observed;

keeping records on insurance, airworthiness and licenses of Ecuadorian civil aircraft;

 

maintaining the National Aircraft Registry;

 

issuing licenses to crews; and

 

controlling air traffic control inside domestic air space.

The EDGAC also must comply with the standards and recommended methods of the ICAO since Ecuador is a signatory of the 1944 Chicago Convention.

Route Rights

Domestic Routes.Airlines must obtain authorization from CNAC (an operating permit or concession) to provide air transportation. For domestic operations, only companies incorporated in Ecuador can operate locally, and only Ecuadorian-licensed aircraft and dry leases are authorized to operate domestically.

International Routes.Permits for international operations are based on air transportation treaties signed by Ecuador or, otherwise, the principle of reciprocity is applied. All airlines doing business in Latin America that are incorporated in countries that are members of theComunidad Andina de Naciones (the Andean Community, or “CAN”) obtain their traffic rights on the basis of decisions currently in force under that regime, in particular decision N°582 of 2004, which guarantee free access to markets, with no type of restriction except technical considerations.

Shared codes are allowed in Ecuador after authorization by the CNAC, but the respective airlines must have the relevant traffic rights.

Airfare Pricing Policy.On October 13, 2011, The Statutory Law of Regulation and Control of the Market Power was passed with a purpose to avoid, prevent, correct, eliminate and sanction the abuse of economic operators with market power, as well as to sanction restrictive, disloyal and agreements involving collusive practices. This Law creates a new public entity as the maximum authority of application and establishes the procedures of investigation and the applicable sanctions, which are severe. Rates are not regulated and are subject only to registration. In general, bilateral treaties regarding air transportation provide for airfares to be regulated by the regulation of the country of origin.

Registration of Aircraft.The legislation allows Ecuadorian companies to provide international air transportation services using aircraft licensed in Ecuador and aircraft with a foreign license, always provided the latter are exploited under dry leases. For domestic operations, aircraft is authorized only pursuant to dry leases and Ecuadorian registration. Aircraft interchange agreements are also allowed for international operations, provided that the aviation authority can confirm that the aircraft is under the operational control of an Ecuadorian operator. Wet leases are permitted, but very restricted.

Safety. In order to ensure aviation safety, the EDGAC requires that the airline hold an Air Operator Certificate and have Operating Specifications that are examined technically and rigorously to ensure compliance with the Civil Aviation Technical Regulations, which are essentially the same as the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FAR”) of the FAA. They cover matters of aircraft airworthiness, certification of maintenance facilities, and oversight by the EDGAC.

Security.The governing rules also apply to security in respect of the EDGAC. There are regulations, manuals and procedures on airport security overseen by the EDGAC.

Airport Policy. The international airports in Quito and Guayaquil are managed under administrative concessions, and the EDGAC merely controls air traffic. Fees for the use of airport facilities, terminal fees, landing fees, parking fees are all overseen and collected by the operator. Over-flight and approach fees are controlled and collected by the EDGAC.

Environmental and Noise Regulation.Aircraft must comply with the standards of category 3 under Ecuadorian applicable noise regulations, as set forth in Executive Decree (Decreto Ejecutivo) 1,405, enacted on October 24,2008, which provides certain technical specific criteria. Beginning in May 2010, aircraft must comply with standards of category 4 under cited regulation. Category 3 provides for compliance with ICAO regulations and technical conditions mandatory in the United States of America.

United States of America

Aeronautical Regulation

Operations to and from the United States by non-U.S. airlines, such as Lan Airlines,LAN, are subject to Title 49 of the U.S. Code, under which the Department of Transportation (“DOT”) and the FAA exercise regulatory authority. The DOT has jurisdiction over international aviation in connection with the United States, subject to review by the President of the United States. The DOT also has jurisdiction with respect to unfair practices and methods of competition by airlines and related consumer protection matters. The U.S. DOJ also has jurisdiction over airline competition matters under the U.S. federal antitrust laws. Flight operations between Chile and the United States by airlines licensed by either country are governed generally by the open skies air transport agreement that Chile and the United States signed in October 1997. Under the open skies agreement, there are no restrictions on the number of destinations or flights that either a U.S. or a Chilean airline may operate between the two countries or on the number of U.S. and Chilean airlines that may operate.

Authorizations and Licenses

Lan AirlinesLAN is authorized by the DOT to engage in scheduled and charter air transportation services, including the transportation of persons, property (cargo) and mail, or combinations thereof, between points in Chile and points in the United States and beyond (via intermediate points in other countries). Lan AirlinesLAN holds the necessary

authorizations from the DOT in the form of a foreign air carrier permit, Exemption Authorizations and Statements of Authorization to conduct current operations to and from the United States. Exemptions and Statements of Authorization are temporary in nature and are subject to renewal and therefore there can be no assurance that any particular exemption or statement of authorization will be renewed. Lan Airlines’LAN’s foreign air carrier permit has no expiration date, while a renewal of the exemption authorization (which includes the open skies traffic rights) was timely filed and the Authority was automatically extended until such time as the DOT issues the renewal order. Lan AirlinesLAN intends to request the inclusion of the open skies rights into our foreign air carrier permit, which would eliminate our need to renew the exemption authority in the future.

The FAA is engaged in the regulation with respect to safety matters, including aircraft maintenance and operations, equipment, aircraft noise, ground facilities, dispatch, communications, personnel, training, weather observation and other matters affecting air safety. The FAA requires each foreign air carrier to obtain certain operations specifications that authorize it to operate to particular airports on approved international routes using specified equipment. Lan AirlinesLAN currently holds FAA operations specifications under Part 129 of the FAR in compliance in all material respects with all requirements necessary to maintain in good standing of its operations specifications issued by the FAA. The FAA can amend, suspend, revoke or terminate those specifications, or can suspend temporarily or revoke permanently our authority if an airline fails to comply with the regulations, and can assess civil penalties for such failure. A modification, suspension or revocation of any of our DOT authorizations or FAA operations specifications could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The FAA also conducts safety audits and has the power to impose fines and other sanctions for violations of airline safety regulations. We have not incurred any material fines related to operations.

Certain Regulatory Authorizations in Connection with Strategic Alliances

The alliance between Lan Airlines and American Airlines includes three major components: a frequent flyer agreement, a reciprocal code-share agreement and the coordination of pricing, scheduling and other functions. The last two of these items required the approval of regulatory authorities in both Chile and the United States. With respect to the code-share agreement, the open skies agreement between Chile and the United States expressly permits code-sharing operations by U.S. and Chilean airlines. With regard to the coordination of pricing and scheduling, Lan Airlines and American Airlines filed a joint application with the DOT in December 1997, requesting approval of their alliance agreement and immunity from the application of all U.S. antitrust laws pursuant to Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Lan Airlines and American Airlines received approval and antitrust immunity from the DOT in September 1999, and implemented the code-share agreement in October 1999. In accordance with the terms of the DOT’s 1999 approval, Lan Airlines and American Airlines were required to resubmit their alliance agreement to the DOT for review within three years after the DOT’s grant of approval. Lan Airlines and American Airlines resubmitted the agreement in September 2002 and did not receive any comments from the DOT.

Lan Peru was granted antitrust immunity by the DOT on October 13, 2005 with respect to the alliance agreements and other agreements incorporated therein (i.e., the reciprocal code-share agreements, among others) with Lan Airlines and American Airlines. In accordance with the terms of the DOT’s 2005 approval, Lan Airlines, Lan Peru and American Airlines resubmitted their alliance agreement to the DOT for review in October 2010.

Security. On November 19, 2001, the Congress of the United States passed, and the President signed into law, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, also referred to as the Aviation Security Act. This law federalized substantially all aspects of civil aviation security and created the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”), which took over security responsibilities previously held by the FAA. The TSA is an agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The Aviation Security Act requires, among other things, the implementation of certain security measures by airlines and airports, such as the requirement that all passenger bags be screened for explosives. Funding for airline and airport security required under the Aviation Security Act is provided in part by a

US$2.50 per segment passenger security fee, subject to a US$10 per roundtrip cap; however, airlines are responsible for costs in excess of this fee. Implementation of the requirements of the Aviation Security Act has resulted in increased costs for airlines and their passengers. Since the events of September 11, 2001, Congress has mandated and the TSA has implemented numerous security procedures and requirements that have imposed and will continue to impose burdens on airlines, passengers and shippers.

Noise Restrictions. Under the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (“ANCA”), and related FAA regulations, aircraft that fly to the United States must comply with certain Stage 3 noise restrictions, which are currently the most stringent FAA noise requirements. All of our aircraft that fly to the United States meet the Stage 3 requirements.

Under the direction of the ICAO, governments are considering the creation of a new and more stringent noise standard than that contained in the ANCA. The ICAO adopted new noise standards in 2001 that established more stringent noise requirements for aircraft manufactured after January 1, 2006. In the U.S., legislation known as the “Vision 100—Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act,” which was signed into law in December 2003, required the FAA to issue regulations implementing Stage 4 noise standards consistent with recommendations adopted by the ICAO. FAA regulations require all aircraft designed and certified after January 1, 2006 to comply with Stage 4 noise restrictions.

FAA regulations also require compliance with the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System, approved airborne wind shear warning system and aging aircraft regulations. Our entire fleet meets these requirements.

Brazil

Aeronautical Regulation

The Brazilian aviation industry is regulated and overseen by the ANAC. The ANAC reports directly to the Civil Aviation Secretary, which is subordinated by the Federal Executive Power of this country. Primarily on the basis of Law No. 11.182/2005, ANAC was created to regulate commercial aviation, air navigation, the assignment of domestic and international routes, compliance with certain insurance requirements, flight operations, including personnel, aircraft and security standards, air traffic control, in this case sharing it activities and responsibilities with theDepartamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo (Department of Airspace Control) (“DECEA”),which is a public secretary also subordinated to the Brazilian Defense Ministry, and airport management, in this last case sharing responsibilities with theEmpresa Brasileira de Infra-Estrutura Aeroportuária (the Brazilian Airport Infrastructure Company, or “INFRAERO”), a public company that was created by Law No. 5862/72, and is responsible for administrating, operating and exploring Brazilian airports industrially and commercially.commercially (with the exception of Guarulhos International Airport, Viracopos International Airport and Brasilia International Airport which was privatized in 2012 and are administrated by concession agreement).

We have obtained and maintain the necessary authority from the Brazilian government to conduct flight operations, including authorization and technical operative certificates from ANAC, the continuation of which is subject to ongoing compliance with applicable statutes, rules and regulations pertaining to the airline industry, including any rules and regulations that may be adopted in the future.

ANAC is the Brazilian civil aviation authority and it is responsible for supervising compliance with Brazilian laws and regulations relating to air navigation. Brazil is a contracting state and a permanent member of the ICAO. The ICAO establishes technical standards for the international aviation industry, which Brazilian authorities, represented by the Brazilian Defense Ministry, have incorporated into Brazilian laws and regulations. In the absence of an applicable Brazilian regulation concerning safety or maintenance, ANAC has incorporated by reference the majority of the ICAO’s technical standards.

Route Rights

Domestic Routes. Brazilian airlines are not required to obtain permits in connection with domestic passenger or cargo transportation, but only to comply with the technical requirements established by ANAC. Based on the Brazilian Aeronautical Code (“CBA”) established by Law No. 7.565/86, non-Brazilian airlines are not permitted to provide domestic air service between destinations in Brazil. The same law prevents a foreign airline from creating a Brazilian subsidiary and entering the Brazilian domestic market using that subsidiary.

International Routes. Brazilian and non-Brazilian airlines providing services on international routes are also subject to a variety of bilateral civil air transport agreements that provide for the exchange of air traffic rights between Brazil and various other countries. International route rights, as well as the corresponding landing rights, are derived from a variety of air transport agreements negotiated between Brazil and foreign governments. Under such agreements, the government of one country grants the government of another country the right to designate one

or more of its domestic airlines to operate scheduled services to certain destinations of the former and, in certain cases, to further connect to third-country destinations. In Brazil, when additional route frequencies to and from foreign cities become available, any eligible airline may apply to obtain them. If there is more than one applicant for a route frequency ANAC must carry out a public bid and award it to the elected airline. ANAC grants route frequencies subject to the condition that the recipient airline operate them on a permanent basis. If an airline fails to operate a route for a period of six months or more, ANAC may terminate its rights to that route. ANAC may also terminate its right if the recipient airline does not operate at least 80% of the frequency given for that specific route.

Airfare Pricing Policy. Brazilian and non-Brazilian airlines are permitted to establish their own international and domestic fares, in this last case only for Brazilian airlines, without government regulation, as long as they do not abuse any dominant market position they may enjoy. Airlines may file complaints before the Antitrust Court with respect to monopolistic or other pricing practices by other airlines that violate Brazil’s antitrust laws.

Registration of Aircraft. Aircraft registration in Brazil is managed by ANAC, which maintains the Brazilian Aeronautical Register, as regulated by the CBA. The CBA allows ANAC to permit registration of aircraft belonging to Brazilian and non-Brazilian individuals.

Safety. ANAC requires that all Brazilian aircraft must have a valid certificate of airworthiness issued by ANAC. In addition, ANAC will not issue maintenance permits to a Brazilian airline until it has assessed the airline’s maintenance capabilities. ANAC renews maintenance permits annually, and has approved our maintenance operations. Only ANAC certifies aircraft maintenance services and its personnel.

Security. ANAC establishes and supervises the implementation of security standards and regulations for the Brazilian commercial aviation industry. Such standards and regulations are based on standards developed by international commercial aviation organizations. Each airline and airport in Brazil must submit an aviation security handbook to ANAC describing its security procedures for the day-to-day operations of commercial aviation and procedures for staff security training.

Brazilian Airport Policy. INFRAERO supervises and manages airports in Brazil, including the supervision of take-off and landing charges. INFRAERO proposes airport charges, which are approved by ANAC and are the same at all airports. At privatized airports, the airport administration manages the facilities under the supervision of ANAC.

Environmental and Noise Regulation. ANAC coordinates and supervises noise regulations by regulation 121, which established noise restriction applicable to aircraft in Brazil. There are no material environmental regulations or controls imposed specifically upon airlines companies, applicable to aircraft, other than Brazilian general environmental laws and regulations.

Colombia

Aeronautical Regulation

The governmental entity in charge of regulating, directing and supervising the civil aviation is the Aeronáutica Civil (“AC”), a technical agency ascribed to the Ministry of Transportation. The AC is the aeronautical authority for the entire domestic territory, in charge of regulating and supervising the Colombian air space. The AC may interpret, apply and complement all civil aviation and air transportation regulation to ensure compliance with the Colombian Aeronautical Regulations (“RAC”). The AC also grants the necessary permits for air transportation.

Route Rights

The AC grants operation permits to domestic and foreign carriercarriers that intend to operate in, from and to Colombia. In the case of Colombian airlines in order to obtain the operational permit the company must comply with the RAC and fulfill legal, economic and technical requirements, to later be subject to public hearings where the public convenience and necessity of the service is considered. The same process must be followed to add national or international routes, whose concession is subject to the bilateral instruments entered into by Colombia. Routes cannot be transferred under any circumstance and there is no limit to foreign investment in domestic airlines.

Airfare Pricing Policy.Since July 2007, as stated in resolution 3299 of the Aeronautical Civil entity, bottom level airfares for both international and domestic transportation were eliminated. Under resolution 904 issued in February 2012, the Aeronautical Civil entity decided to liberalize the obligation of charging a fuel surcharge for both domestic and international transportation of passengers and cargo. As of April 1, 2012, air carriers may now freely decide whether or not to charge a fuel surcharge. In the case that it is charged, the fuel surcharge must be part of the fare, but may be informed separately on the tickets, advertising or other methods of marketing used by the company.

In the same line, beginning on April 1, 2012 there will no longer be any restriction on top level fares published by the airlines or with respect to the obligations for air carriers to report to the Aeronautical civil entity the fares and conditions the day after being published.

Administrative fares are not subject to any changes and its charge is an obligation for the transport of passengers under Aeronautical Civil Regulations.

Registration of Aircraft.The AC, through the Office of Aeronautical Registration, is in charge of handling the registration of aircraft that will be operated by Colombian airlines. Registration may be obtained by a registration process fully conducted in Colombia or through the validation in Colombia of a foreign registration. For such registration, the aircraft must be legally imported to the country and inspected by the aeronautical inspectors. This office is also in charge of property registrations, lease contracts and liens of the registered aircraft.

Safety. Aircraft registered in Colombia obtain an airworthiness certificate or a validation of the airworthiness certificate (if they operate under the approval of the foreign registration).

Security.Following the guidelines of the OACI annexes, the AC issued an airport security program that must be strictly complied with by all the aircraft operators in the country as well as by airports.

Environmental and Noise Regulation.In Colombia, only aircraft that comply with category 3 noise limits may operate. There are strict regulations to control noise during takeoffs and landings of the aircraft at the El Dorado Airport in Bogotá due to its location in an urban area.

Antitrust Regulation

The Chilean antitrust authority, which we refer to as the Antitrust Court (previously the Antitrust Commission), oversees antitrust matters, which are governed by Decree Law No. 211 of 1973, as amended, or the Antitrust Law. The Antitrust Law prohibits any entity from preventing, restricting or distorting competition in any market or any part of any market. The Antitrust Law also prohibits any business or businesses that have a dominant position in any market or a substantial part of any market from abusing that dominant position. An aggrieved person may sue for damages arising from a breach of Antitrust Law and/or file a complaint with the Antitrust Court requesting an order to enjoin the violation of the Antitrust Law. The Antitrust Court has the

authority to impose a variety of sanctions for violations of the Antitrust Law, including termination of contracts contrary to the Antitrust Law, dissolution of a company and imposition of fines and daily penalties on businesses. Courts may award damages and other remedies (such as an injunction) in appropriate circumstances. Lan Airlines, Lan Express and Lan Cargo must comply with Chilean Antitrust Law that prohibits a carrier from abusing a dominant position in the market. As described above under “Route“—Route Rights—Air FareAirfare Pricing Policy,” in October 1997, the Antitrust Court approved a specific self-regulatory fare plan for us consistent with the Antitrust Court’s directive to maintain a competitive environment within the domestic market.

Since October 1997, LanLAN Airlines S.A. and LanLAN Express follow a self-regulatory plan, which was modified and approved by the Tribunal de la Libre Competencia (the Competition Court) in July 2005.2005, and further in September, 2011. In February 2010, the Fiscalía Nacional Economica (the National Economic Prosecutor’s Office) finalized the investigation initiated in 2007 regarding our compliance with this self-regulatory plan and no further observations were made.

made

As a condition to the business combination between LAN and TAM in June 2012, the antitrust authorities in Chile and in Brazil each imposed certain mitigation measures as part of their approval of the merger. Furthermore, the merger was submitted to the antitrust authorities in Germany, Italy and Spain. All these jurisdictions granted unconditional clearances for this transaction. The merger was filed with the Argentinean antitrust authorities, which approval is still pending. For more recent information regarding regulatory proceedingsthese mitigation measures please see “Item 8. Financial Information—Consolidated Financial Statementsbelow:

Chile

On September 21, 2011, the TDLC issued the Decision with respect to the consultation procedure initiated on January 28, 2011 in connection with the proposed combination. The TDLC, in the Decision, approved the proposed combination between LAN and Other Financial Information—LegalTAM, subject to 14 conditions, as generally described below:

exchange of certain slots in the Guarulhos Airport at Săo Paulo, Brazil;

extension of the frequent flyer program to airlines operating or willing to operate the Santiago-Săo Paulo, Santiago-Río de Janeiro, Santiago-Montevideo and Arbitration Proceedings”.Santiago-Asunción routes during the five-year period from the effective time of the merger;

execution of interline agreements with airlines operating the Santiago-Săo Paulo, Santiago-Río de Janeiro and Santiago-Asunción routes;

certain capacity and other transitory restrictions applicable to the Santiago-Săo Paulo route;

certain amendments to LAN’s self-regulatory fare plan approved by the TDLC with respect to LAN’s domestic passenger business;

the obligation of LATAM to renounce to one global airline alliance within 24 months from the date in which the merger becomes effective, except in the case that the TDLC approves otherwise, or to elect not to participate in any global airline alliance;

certain restrictions on codeshare agreements outside the global airline alliance to which LATAM belongs for routes with origin or destination in Chile or that connect to North America and Europe, or with Avianca/TACA or GOL for international routes in South America, including the obligation to consult with, and obtain approval from, the TDLC prior to its execution of certain of those codeshare agreements;

the abandonment of four air traffic frequencies with fifth freedom rights between Chile and Perú and limitations on acquiring in excess of 75%, as applicable, of the air traffic frequencies in that route and the period that certain air traffic frequencies may be granted by the Chilean air transport authorities to LAN;

issuance of a statement by LATAM supporting the unilateral opening of the Chilean domestic skies (cabotage) and abstention from any actions that would prevent such opening;

promotion by LATAM of the growth and normal operation of the Guarulhos (Brazil) and Arturo Merino Benítez (Chile) airports, to facilitate access thereto to other airlines;

certain restrictions regarding incentives to travel agencies;

to maintain temporarily 12 round trip flights per week between Chile and the United States and at least seven round trip non-stop flights per week between Chile and Europe;

certain transitory restrictions on increasing fares in the Santiago-Săo Paulo and Santiago-Río de Janeiro routes for the passenger business and for the Chile-Brazil routes for the cargo business; and

engaging an independent consultant, expert in airline operations, which for 36 months, and in coordination with the FNE, will monitor and audit compliance with the conditions imposed by the Decision.

Brazil

On September 3, 2010, LAN and TAM submitted a merger filing before the Brazilian Antitrust System, composed of CADE, the SDE and the SEAE. The filing was made based on the Memorandum of Understanding, executed by the parties on August 13, 2010. As per the request of the parties, the SEAE suspended its analysis of the merger filing until the parties had taken more definitive steps with respect to the proposed combination. On October 21, 2010, the parties informed SEAE of the execution of the Instrumento Particular de Ratificaçăo de Entendimento by the parties on October 12, 2010, pursuant to which the parties agreed on a transaction structure for the proposed combination and thus requested that SEAE resume its analysis of the merger filing. SEAE issued its report approving the merger filing without any restrictions on August 11, 2011. The case was then further examined by CADE’s Reporting Commissioner, Olavo Chinaglia, for an additional four months. CADE sent information requests to LAN and TAM (Official Letter Nos. 1830/2011; 1945/2011; 2410/2011; and 2493/2011) to complement SEAE’s analysis. On December 14, 2011, the case was adjudicated in a Plenary Session, where the board of CADE approved the transaction with the following conditions: (i) LAN and TAM cannot be members of more than one global airline alliance; (ii) LAN and TAM must swap two pairs of slots at the Guarulhos Airport with one or more companies that is willing to operate non-stop flights in the Săo Paulo-Santiago route, granting the swapping companies the necessary infrastructure in the Guarulhos Airport; and (iii) LAN and TAM must publish the contents of the decision in newspapers widely sold in Brazil, and send letters to carriers that operate commercial flights from the Guarulhos Airport, informing them of the decision.

C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

LANLATAM Airlines Group is a company primarily involved in the transportation of passengers and cargo. Our operations are carried out principally by Lan AirlinesLAN, and also by a number of different subsidiaries.subsidiaries and affiliates, including TAM. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, in the passenger business we operated through sixseven main airlines: Lan Airlines,LAN, Transporte Aéreo S.A. (which does business under the name “Lan“LAN Express”), LanLAN Perú S.A. (“LanLAN Peru”), Aerolane, Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A. (“LanLAN Ecuador”), LanLAN Argentina S.A. (“LanLAN Argentina,” previously Aero 2000 S.A.) and Lan Colombia S.A. (“Lan Colombia”) previously denominated, Aerovías de Integración Regional, Aires S.A. (“Aires”).

In the passenger(which does business we market our sales primarily under the “LAN” brand”. name “LAN Colombia”) and TAM Linhas Aereas S.A. (“TAM Linhas Aereas”)

As of February 29, 201228, 2013 we held a 99.90% stake in LanLAN Express through direct and indirect interests, a 69.98% stake in LanLAN Peru through direct and indirect interests, a 71.95% indirect stake in LanLAN Ecuador, a 94.99% indirect stake in LanLAN Argentina, and a 98.21% indirect stake in Lan Colombia.LAN Colombia and a 100.00% of the non-voting shares of TAM and 19.42% of the voting shares of Holdco I S.A., who has the 100.00% of the voting shares of TAM. For a description of the recent combination with TAM, including TAM’s operating structure, see “Item 4. History and Development of the Company—Combination of LAN and TAM.”

Our cargo operations are carried out by a number of companies,our subsidiaries and affiliates, including, Lan AirlinesTAM Linhas Aereas and LanLAN Cargo. Lan Airlines and Lan CargoOur cargo operations are complemented by the operations of certain related companies, such as Aero Transportes Mas de Carga S.A. de C.V. (“MasAir”), in Mexico, Aerolinhas Brasileiras S.A. (“ABSA”), in Brazil and Linea Aérea Carguera de Colombia S.A. (“Lanco”LANCO”), in Colombia. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, we indirectly held a 69.08% stake in100% of the non voting shares and a 24.99% of the voting shares of MasAir, through directa 100% of the non-voting shares and indirect participations, a 73.26% stake in20% of the voting shares of ABSA, through direct and indirect participations, and aan 89.90% stake in LANCO through direct and indirect participations. Following the business combination between LAN and TAM, we have coordinated the operations of ABSA and TAM Cargo in Brazil. In the cargo business, we market ourselves primarily under the LanLAN Cargo brand.brand internationally and the TAM Cargo brand in Brazil.

In addition to our air transportation activities, we provide a series of ancillary services. We offer handling services, courier services and logistics, small package and express door-to-door services through Lan AirlinesLAN, TAM Linhas Aereas and various subsidiaries.

D. PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT

From February 1, 2013, LAN Infrastructure Management and TAM Infrastructure Management will both report to the Director of Purchasing and Infrastructure of LATAM. Both LAN and TAM infrastructure management teams have worked together during 2012 regarding strategic planning for infrastructure issues for the LATAM Airlines Group.

LAN’s Property, Plant and Equipment

Headquarters

Our main facilities are located on approximately five acres of land that we own near the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport. The complex includes approximately 150,695 square feet of office space, 32,292 square feet of conference space and training facilities, 9,688 square feet of dining facilities and mock-up cabins used for crew instruction. In 2004, we adapted part of this building to meet our expanding training needs. This process included developing new rooms for technical instruction, in-flight and airport services.

During the fourth quarter of 2003, we moved some of our executive offices into a new building in a more central location in Santiago, Chile, where we initially occupied a total of four floors owned by LAN. In the first half of 2005 we added three more floors to accommodate our growth requirements. These floors are also owned by LAN. InLAN.In 2007, in order to accommodate the Company’s growth, LAN leased two floors in an adjacent building (totaling 18,298 square feet), where some of LAN staff moved in February 2008. We have leased these additional floors since 2007, under a 5-year lease at a rate of approximately US$46,400 per month. In 2009, to respond to the Company’s growth, LAN leased two additional floors in this building (totaling 12,917 square feet). We have leased these additional floors since 2009, under a 3-year lease at a rate of approximately US$26,800 per month. In 2010, new offices were leased east of Santiago to allow for Company growth and to implement projects such as “Host,” which involves changing our system of reservations, sales, inventory and passenger check-in. We have leased these additional offices since 2010, under a 4-year lease at a rate of approximately US$35,000 per month. These additional offices add a total of 19,913 square feet to LAN’s property.

Furthermore, during 2011 we added to our facilities a new 11,840 square feet floor at the Arrau Building located in Santiago, Chile, which we lease for the new facilities of LAN Cargo. We have leased this floor since 2011, under a 3-year lease at a rate of approximately US$29,600 per month.

Maintenance Base

Our 877,258 square feet maintenance base is located on a site that we own inside the grounds of the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport. This facility contains our aircraft hangar, warehouses, workshops and offices, as well as a 559,720 square feet aircraft parking area capable of accommodating up to seventeen short-haul aircraft. We have a five-floor, 53,820 square feet office building plus a 10,000 square feet office and workshop

space. This facility is certified by several civil aviation authorities, including the United States’ FAA. As such, we are permitted to perform maintenance work for third parties at the facility. The FAA periodically inspects the facility to ensure its compliance with FAA standards. In 2005, we finalized the construction of an additional hangar, as well as 75,000 square feet of aircraft parking space, for US$2.1 million. During 2006 we started a new investment plan at this facility that included building 64,580 square feet of additional aircraft parking space, a new 15,340 square feet building for offices and maintenance shops, a new 16,680 square feet engine shop and storage facility, and additional warehousing and external work space. The plan also included the upgrade of some of the current facilities, increasing parking space and building a new access road. Furthermore, in 2006 we completed the construction of an engine workshop with eight workstations and capacity for 36 engines, for a total investment of US$820,000. We also lease from the DGAC 193,750 square feet of space inside the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport for operational and service purposes. Our lease has a duration of 14 years at a rate of approximately US$42,000 per month.

In 2007, LAN approved a two-year capital expenditures plan earmarking approximately US$7.0 million for preparing our buildingsDuring 2012, we continued to invest and plants forimprove the future growthmaintance base infrastructure with the objective of having world class facilities, including new access to the Company and ofbase, which allows facilities access control, therefore, improves its fleet.security.

During 2008, LAN finalized2013, there will be a series of infrastructure projects undertaken, the most significant of which is the construction of a 4,300 square feet warehouse especially designed for the storage of oil and flammable supplies,north platform which complies with all the security standards required for its operation. We also upgraded some facilities such as bathrooms and dressing rooms in our maintenance base increasing the total area in 15,000 square feet.

During 2009, LAN finalized the construction of aallows adding 13 new five-story building located in our maintenance base, which has a total surface of 49,500 square feet and representedA320 aircraft parking space. These works are expected to involve an investment of US$5.8approximately U$5 million. This building has new workshops, a new food court with capacity for over 2,500 people in different shifts, two floors of new offices and meeting rooms.

Also, during 2009, LAN finalized the extension of the engine workshop, which added 900 square feet and represented an investment of US$0.5 million. This extension will be used mainly for the Boeing 777’s engine maintenance.

During 2010, LAN remodeled portions of the administrative offices in the Mario Bontempi Building and the Luis Ernesto Videla Building, which are located within the Company’s maintenance base on the ground of the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benitez International Airport.

Miami Facilities

We occupy a 36.3-acre site at the Miami International Airport that has been leased to us by the airport under a concession agreement. Our facilities include a 48,000 square feet corporate building, a 380,000 square feet cargo warehouse (including a 10,000 square meter cooling area) and a 783,000 square feet aircraft-parking platform, which were constructed and are now leased to us under a long-term contract by a North American developer. We began using these new facilities in September 2001 for our passengerdeveloper, and cargo offices (with the exception of our reservations and ticket offices). We convertedapproximately 21,528 square feet of thefurnished office space, which we converted from warehouse into fully furnished offices duringspace in 2004. The considerationrent we pay for the use of this space is approximately US$735,000 per month.

During 2009, LAN began We are currently negotiating with the extensionlocal airport authority regarding its construction of a new hangar at the cooling area in the cargo warehouse. This extension added 30,000 square feet and represented an investment of US$4.0 million. This extension was inaugurated on April 20, 2010.Miami International Airport, which we expect to lease from them when it is constructed.

During 2010, LAN signed a concession agreement with the AMB Property Corporation to add a new cargo warehouse for additional areas for future developments. Our concession has a duration of 5 years at a rate of approximately US$215,000 per month.

Other Facilities

We own a building and sixteen acres of land on the west side of the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport that houses a flight-training center. As of February 29, 2011,28, 2013, this facility features three full-flight simulators for Boeing 767, Airbus A320 and Boeing 737 aircraft. We leased this flight-training center under a long-term lease to CAE Inc. (a leading Canadian company in the flight training business) at a rate of approximately US$18,000 per month. These full-flight simulators were expanded during the second semester of 2011. We own a 661,980-square feet warehouse in Santiago, which includes 91,493 square feet of space for offices and other administrative facilities and 45,000 square feet distribution center. LAN currently leases the property to Blue Express, former subsidiaries of LAN that were sold on April 6, 2011 to Bethia.

In 2004, Fast Air Almacenes de Carga S.A. (“Fast Air”), one of our subsidiaries that operateoperates import customs warehouses, began utilizing an import warehouse and office building at the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport. This 172,000 square feet building was developed in conjunction with two other operators. We have leased these facilities from 2004 under a 9-year leaseuntil 2013 at a rate of approximately US$200,000 per month.

We have also developed a recreational facility for our employees with Airbus’ support. The facility, denominated “Parque LAN,” is located inon land that we own near the Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport. Parque LAN includes amenities such as a gymnasium, synthetic fields for multiple uses and swimming pools.

LAN Peru’s Property, Plant and Equipment

LAN Peru has approximately 19,000 m2 built. All facilities are leased and are distributed as follows:

Administrative Offices: 7,000 m2

Sales Offices: 2,000 m2

Concessions airports: 10,000 m2

During 2008,2007, we acquired a 43,000166,840 square feet, piece of land in Chile, which represented a US$12 million investment, for the purpose of constructing our new corporate building.

During 2008, we acquired a 161,000 square feet15,500 m2 piece of land near the Lima airport, which willto host new corporate and training facilities for the Company. Currently,The training facilities for flight and cabin crews (instructor center) were completed in 2012 by CAE-Perú. These facilities have capacity for two flight simulators (Airbus A320s and Boeing 767s), modern facilities for emergency evacuation practice (including pool to practice ditching) and classrooms. Total investment in this infrastructure was just over US$4 million. In addition, in 2010 we won a private tender to lease a piece of land and hangar inside the Lima airport for our maintenance facilities, this construction was completed in 2012, and included the remodeling of an old hangar that was fully modified. The land is rented to LAN Peru for a period of 5 years, and is renewable. The new maintenance facilities have staff facilities on three floors with approximately 3,500 m² of space, a hangar with a covered area of approximately 6,500 m² (space for three Airbus A320s or one Boeing 767) plus an outplatform of approximately 3,500 m². The total investment in this infrastructure project was approximately US$4 million.

Finally, we are renting eight floors in a building and three floors in another building for our corporate facilities. We are also renting twenty three commercial offices around the country.

LAN Colombia’s Property, Plant and Equipment

LAN Colombia has approximately 27,500 m2 built. All facilities are leased and are distributed as follows:

Administrative Offices: 4,500 m2

Sales Offices: 1,700 m2

Concessions airports: 21,300 m2

During 2012, new administrative and operational offices were created in the Logistic center (PARQUE DEL SOL) near the El Dorado airport in Bogota. The Project involved the remodeling and expansion of storage with offices and administrative space, with the capacity for more than 200 people. The investment was approximately US$1.6 million and the total area of the new offices is 1,150 m².

LAN Ecuador’s Property, Plant and Equipment

LAN Ecuador has approximately 14,500 m2 built. All facilities are leased and are distributed as follows:

Administrative Offices: 1,600 m2

Sales Offices: 1,000 m2

Concessions airports: 11,900 m2

In Ecuador, the New Quito Airport is expected to open in February 2013 and LAN Ecuador has spent approximately US$4.5 million for facilities and infrastructure investments at this new airport. During the construction period, LAN Ecuador (and other airlines) were required to make significant investments for airport infrastructure in this new airport.

During 2012, LAN began the construction of this buildingnew facilities for Andes, a company that performs ground service aircraft handling services for LAN Ecuador and acts as an airport service provider. A new facility for line maintenance and operations was also constructed. Each of these facilities is on-hold. built on land concessioned by QUIPORT and LAN expects the facilities to open during the first quarter of 2013. Further information regarding the size and amount of these investments is detailed in the table below:

Facilities

  Ground
(m2)
   Constructions
(m2)
   Pavements
(m2)
   Investment
(US$)
 

ANDES

   4,000     3,134     1,800     2,500,000  

MAINTENANCE

   15,167     1,300     6,200     2,000,000  

LAN Argentina’s Property, Plant and Equipment

In March 2009, we began the construction of a new maintenance base in Argentina. The project includedArgentina with a new hangar of 26,900 square feet with 9,600 square feet of offices, 1,070 square feet of workshops and an exterior platform of 5,300 square feet. This project comprised ainvolves an investment of approximately US$3.2 million investment and was completed in 2009. This facility is meant for the parking and maintenance of A320 aircraft and it’s capable of providing full maintenance, including C-Checks.

LAN Argentina has approximately 18,000 m2 built. All facilities are leased and are distributed as follows:

Administrative Offices: 6,600 m2

Sales Offices: 2,600 m2

Concessions airports: 8,700 m2

On December of 2012, LAN Argentina launched its new VIP lounge in Terminal B of the Ezeiza Airport. An area of 600 m² was built to house a modern lounge with a capability of more than 150 passengers, with areas for resting, work, entertainment, bathrooms and shower services. The total investment in this project was approximately US$ 2 million.

Sale of Real Estate

During 2012, LATAM sold two properties in Santiago. One of them is a 4,000 m2 plot of land located in Las Condes, where LAN had planned to build a new corporate building. This property was sold for UF 646,261 (approximately US$ 30 Million).

The other piece of land was located in Quilicura with approximately 14,500 m², where LAN courier services previously operated. The sale of this asset generated non-operating income of UF 298,000 (US$14 Million)

TAM’s Property Plant and Equipment

Headquarters

TAM’s main facilities are located in São Paulo, in hangars within the Congonhas Airport and nearby. At Congonhas Airport, TAM leases hangars belonging to INFRAERO (the Local Administrator Airport):

Hangar VII: 11,445 m² distributed in eight floors of offices with approximately 1,460 workstations, for a rental amount of approximately R$ 17,000/month.

Hangar VIII: 1,675 m² distributed on three floors with about 265 workstations, for a rental amount of approximately R$ 30,000/month. In 2012 TAM invested approximately R$ 1.8 million for reforms and improvement of the facilities in this hangar.

Hangar III: 4,007 m² distributed on two floors with about 60 workstations, for a rental amount of approximately R$ 103,000/month, used exclusively for cargo services.

The Service Academy is located at Rua Atica, about 2.5 km from Congonhas Airport, is a separate property which TAM owns, exclusively for the areas of Selection, Medical Service, Training, and Mock-ups, comprising 15,342 m² distributed in 11 floors and about 240 workstations.

Base Maintenance

At Hangars II and V in Congonhas Airport, which TAM leases for approximately R$39,510 and R$52,665 per month, TAM has 15,650 m² of offices and hangars with about 1,050 workstations. This site also houses the areas of Aircraft Maintenance, Procurement and Logistics of Aeronautical Materials, and has been receiving a retrofit since 2008 for operational improvements at a total investment amount of approximately R$ 30 million.

Other Facilities

In São Paulo, TAM has other facilities such as: Commercial Headquarters, an old Pantanal´s office area leased, located 7.0 km from Congonhas Airport, with 540 m² and about 94 workstations; Uniform Building, located 700 m from the Service Academy, with 890 m2 and about 10 workstations, exclusive use for storage and delivery of uniforms; Morumbi Office Tower located 8.0 km from Congonhas Airport, with 330 m2 area and about 85 workstations exclusive for the Financial area, Call Center Building at Rua Augusta near to Paulista with 110 m2 and about 150 workstations distributed in four floors.

Besides, in São Paulo, TAM has the offices belonging to the Group as: Multiplus Office, located in Brooklin region at 6.7 km from Congonhas Airport, with 800 m2 leased, with approximately 150 workstations; TAM Viagens Office, located in the region of Paulista 9.0 Km from Congonhas Airport, with 2,800 m2 leased distributed in 04 floors and about 265 workstations; Two Stores of TAM Viagens, at Rua Augusta with 110 m2 leased and about 10 workstations and at Shopping SP Market with 50 m2 leased and about 05 workstations.

In Guarulhos, TAM has a total area of approximately 12,894 m2 distributed in the Passenger Terminal, Operational Areas such as Check-in, Ticket Sales, Check Out, Operations Areas, VIP Lounges, Aircraft Maintenance, GSE, Cargo Terminal, Distribution Centers, etc. The Cargo Terminal has 164 m2 of office and 15,000 m2 of open area. The Distribution Centre Supplies has 3,030 m2. We have a VIP Lounge recently opened in October 2012 with 540 m2, with capacity for 174 seats located in Terminal 2, and 02 other VIP Lounges with 280 m2 and 120 m2.

In Brazil, TAM has a total of 45 online sites and 10 offline/chartering/high season sites, located in the capitals and main cities of the country, composing 78,772 m2 of areas in Airports, Aircraft Maintenance, GSE, Hangars, Cargo Terminals, Commercial Offices, etc. TAM also has 133 franchised stores of TAM Viagens through Brazil.

Abroad, TAM has a total of 30 sites in 6,300 m², including 10 online sites and three offline/chartering/high season sites located in Latin America (except Brazil) with an area of 3,500 m², five online sites and one offline site in Central and North America with an area of 1,000 m², five online sites and three offline sites in Europe and three offline sites in Asia with a total area of 1,800 m².

New Headquarters

TAM has a project for New Headquarters with an area of 5,066 m², of which two and one-third floors are leased, with a forecast space for 690 workstations. The New Headquarters will be located at the Tower Bridge Building, located in Brooklin region, approximately 6.7 km from Congonhas Airport. TAM expects to take occupancy of the New Headquarters in June 2013 and has expended a total investment of approximately R$6.0 million in this project.

New Facilities

TAM has several projects for new facilities in 2013, the most significant of which are a new cargo terminal in Manaus that will integrate the operations of ABSA and TAM Cargo in the city, with a cargo space of about 4,700 m²; construction of a new ground support equipment (“GSE”) area in Guarulhos with an area of approximately 19,202 m², new construction of GSE area in Florianópolis with an area of approximately 400 m²; new construction of GSE area in Vitória with 255 m² and the new distribution center for supplies in Guarulhos, with an area of approximately 3,035 m². In total, TAM expects to expend approximately R$30 million on these projects in 2013.

ITEM 4AUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

A. Operating Results

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes beginning on page F-13F-1 of this annual report.

The summary As a result of the combination of LAN and TAM on June 22, 2012, the discussion of LATAM’s results of operations below includes: (i) a discussion of LATAM’s consolidated annual financial information as ofresults for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and2012, which includes the consolidated results of TAM from June 23, 2012, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, andwhich consists of LAN’s historical audited consolidated results, (ii) a supplementary discussion of the unaudited pro forma results of LATAM Airlines Group for the years ended December 31, 2009,2012 and December 31, 2011, prepared for illustrative purposes only, to present a discussion of LATAM’s results on a consolidated basis and giving effect to the combination with TAM as if it had occurred on January 1, 2011 and (iii) a discussion of LATAM’s consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, and 2011, has been prepared in accordance with IFRS and has been derived from ourwhich represent LAN’s historical audited consolidated annual financial statements included in this annual report.results, for both periods.

Overview

The principal and most distinctive aspect of our business model is the way in which we integrate our passenger and cargo activities. Our sophisticated service-oriented approach to combining passenger and cargo traffic enables us to better utilize our aircraft, reduce our break-even load factors on passenger flights, and diversify our revenue streams. Furthermore, the geographically diversified nature of theour passenger and cargo networks of LAN and its subsidiaries provideprovides additional diversification in our operations and reducereduces exposure to any single market. These benefits have helped us maintain strong profitability and expand our operations, consistently in recent years, despite volatile macroeconomic conditions and various external shocks that have affected the airline industry over the years.

Approximately 98% of our revenues are generated by our air transport activities. We generate the balance of our operating revenues from tour operator services, aircraft leases, on-board sales, third-party maintenance, ground handling and customs and storage brokerage operations.

In June 2012, LATAM Airlines Group was formed through the business combination of LAN and TAM. During the second half of 2012, LATAM began the integration of LAN and TAM’s business units and the transformation necessary to achieve the expected merger synergies, implementing adjustments to commercial practices and aligning operations and processes in its international and domestic passenger operations in Brazil. For the divested courier unit which was soldyear ended December 31, 2012, LATAM had incurred approximately $59.2 million in April 2011.one-time direct costs relating to the business combination and transition and integration costs on a pro forma basis. Although in the short term the Company’s results are expected to be impacted by these transition and integration costs, the Company expects to achieve increased operating income in the long-term as a result of substantial synergies between these two businesses. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Combination of LAN and TAM.”

Our operating environment in 20112012 was marked by continued growth in both cargo and passenger operations, compared with 2010, coupled with fuel price increases which impacted our operating costs and to a lesser extent influenced the increase in yields. The Company demonstrated its ability to manage higher fuel prices through its fuel surcharge policy and financial hedging strategy in addition to tactical capacity adjustments on certain routes. Additionally our operations were impacted by the volcanic ash cloud resulting from the eruption of the Puyehue volcano in the south of Chile that took place from the second quarter 2011 and appeared in a discontinuous manner throughout the remaining part of the year. Costs were also impacted by the consolidation of LAN’s Colombian operations starting in January 2011, and one-time costs related to the startup and turnaround of Aires’ operations, which generated an operating loss of US$51.7 million in 2011.

but reduced cargo demand. During 2011, growth in2012, passenger demand was driven by growthcontinued to be strong in both domesticmost of South America and on international marketsroutes, as reflected in the region. Latin America continues to showLATAM’s strong traffic growth and high load factors. In the cargo business, although we continue to face a challenging scenario due to a slowdown in world trade momentum, and a decline in demand on international and domestic routes supported by robust economic conditions in LAN’s home markets. Similarly during this period, cargo demand in the region showed solid growth as a result of continued trade activity mainly supported by markets such as Brazil, in which currency appreciation has a positive impact on trade imports. While competition on both passenger and cargo routes has grown gradually since 2006, during this period the growth of import flows to Latin America continued.(especially to Brazil), demand remains strong on northbound routes. Export volumes from Chile have also recovered, partly driven by the gradual resurgence of salmon exports. Weaker cargo

markets globally have driven additional competition to South America, especially Brazil, and have also resulted in higher competitive activity within the region. On the other hand, export volumes in Chile have recovered, partly driven by the gradual resurgence of salmon exports. ChangesHowever, changes in competitive conditions in specific markets still generate opportunities for us to expand. Certain factors outside

Our operating expenses in 2012 were impacted by fuel price increases, the depreciation of our control, suchlocal currencies, especially the Brazilian real, and one-time costs related to the business combination of LAN and TAM in June 2012, as fuelwell as ongoing expenses relating to the development of LAN Colombia’s operations. Fuel prices that have risen consistently since 2002, and reachedreaching historically record-highrecord high levels in mid-2008, and have also generated significant cost pressures. During 2011,In 2012, our average cost for fuel prices again increased 96.3% as compared to 2010.

2011 (9.7% increase on a pro forma basis). The Company continues to manage higher fuel prices through its fuel surcharge policy and financial hedging strategy, as well as tactical capacity adjustments on certain routes. Our results for the period between 2010 and 20112012 reflect our effortsstrategy in recent years to expand and diversify our revenue base while maintaining an efficient cost base. We have aimed to effectively respond to the opportunities and challenges presented by the expansion and diversification of our revenue base. This process included continuingincludes the

business combination with TAM and the ongoing expansion of our domestic passenger operations in Chile, Peru, Argentina, Ecuador, Colombia and Ecuador and starting passenger operations in Colombia through the purchase of Aires in November 2010.Brazil. As a result, we have significantly increased our passenger capacity and redeployed our assets in response to specific opportunities. In the cargo business, we have adjusted our routes and our capacity mix to adapt to changing cargo flows and we have expanded cargo operations within the region and on long haul routes to take advantage of existing opportunities. We have also launched initiatives to enhance customer preference and increase efficiency. These initiatives have enabled us to maintain a solid market position and to develop new mechanisms to sustain high levels of profitability despite facing many challenges in recent years, including unprecedented high fuel prices during 2008, the negative effects of the global economic crisis during 2009, and natural disasters such as the earthquake and volcano eruption in Chile during 2010 and 2011, respectively. As a result,respectively and one-time costs related to the business combination between LAN and TAM and the increase of the Chilean corporate tax rate from 17% to 20% during 2012. Notwithstanding these challenges, our net income amounted to US$336.5 million in 2008, US$231.1 million in 2009, US$419.7 million in 2010, and US$320.2 million in 2011.

Our operating results during 2011 evidenced our ability to leverage continued growth opportunitiesand US$11.0 million in both cargo and passenger markets, enhancing our leadership position in Latin America and reflecting our ability to face and mitigate impacts2012. On a pro forma basis, LATAM experienced a net loss of adverse scenarios such as fuel price volatility and natural disasters. Based on our diversified, solid and flexible business model, as well as our consistent track record and solid balance sheet, we are continuously improvingUS$419.0 million for the Company’s long-term strategic position by addressing opportunities, strengthening our market presence and increasing competitiveness.year ended December 31, 2012.

Passenger Operations

In general, our passenger revenues are driven by international and country-specific political and economic conditions, competitive activity, the attractiveness of the destinations that we serve, and the capacity we allocate among our different routes. Passenger revenues are also affected by our capacity, traffic, load factors, yield and unit revenue. Our capacity is measured in terms of available seat kilometers, or ASKs, which represents the number of seats we make available for sale, multiplied by the kilometers flown. We measure traffic in revenue passenger kilometers, or RPKs, as the number of passengers on our flights multiplied by the number of kilometers flown. Load factors represent RPKs (traffic) as a percentage of ASKs (capacity), or the percentage of our capacity that is actually used by paying customers. Finally, we use yield, or revenue from passenger operations divided by RPKs, to measure the average amount that one passenger pays to fly one kilometer and unit revenue, or revenue per ASK, to measure the effect of capacity on revenues. See “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data.” The following discussion of revenue drivers in our passenger operations is based on our unaudited pro forma operating results for 2012 and 2011 where specified.

Passenger demand has grown inover the lastpast years, driven by positive economic conditions in Latin America. Economic growth and improved customer confidence have led to an expansion in both business and leisure traffic to and from Latin America. Increased interest in travel into South America from Europe and the United States has been another factor positively impacting overall passenger traffic. As a consequence, passenger volumes in markets such as Chile, Peru, Argentina and Ecuador grew significantly between 2010 and 2011. LAN’s2012. In 2012, LATAM’s passenger traffic increased 7.7% (on a pro forma basis) as measured in RPKs. LATAM’s traffic growth during 2011, which reached 15.9%,2012 was also based on a capacity expansion plan driven by the net delivery of eighteen15 new passenger aircraft during the year plusyear. In 2012, LATAM’s passenger capacity increased 4.6% as measured in ASKs (on a pro forma basis) which focused mainly on domestic routes, regional routes within Latin America and long haul routes to the incorporation of Colombian operations throughUnited States, whereas in Brazil LATAM reduced its capacity by 1.0% during the Aires acquisition, which contributed approximately 4.5%year. Although demand in Brazil softened during 2012, the Brazilian domestic market is operating with capacity discipline, providing the basis for improved profitability in that market. During 2012, the combined yield for the international and domestic passenger businesses (a 6.3% decrease on a pro forma basis), reflecting a more challenging environment due to our total capacity measured by ASKs.transition into a consolidated operating company (LATAM Airlines Group) following the combination of LAN and TAM, the depressed demand in our Brazilian domestic operations and the depreciation of local currencies, especially the Brazilian real.

Competitive activity on both our domestic and international passenger routes has also varied over the last several years. On our international routes, competition has gradually increased as both incumbent and new competitors expanded their operations. Nevertheless, we have maintained our market share in most of our international markets since 2005 and have gradually increased our presence in the domestic markets of Chile and Argentina, as well as in international routes. We also initiatedhave increased our domestic operations, initiating operations in Ecuador in April 2009, in Colombia in 2010 and in Colombia, throughBrazil in 2012 following the acquisitionbusiness combination between LAN and TAM.

As a result of Aires in November 2010. In December 2011 Aires was rebranded as LAN Colombia.

During 2011 the above factors, LATAM’s combined yield for the international and domestic passenger businessespro forma revenues increased 11.2%, reflecting1.0% in 2012 to US$11,065.9 million, representing 83.4% of the strong demand and increaseCompany’s total pro forma annual revenues for 2012. Passenger revenues as reported increased 99.0% in fuel surcharges, in line with the2012, resulting from an as reported increase of WTI prices and the crack spread. The growth rates94.4% in traffic, and capacity increase of 93.8% in 2011 included inorganic growth resulting from2012. The increase in as reported revenue, traffic and capacity is primarily due to the inclusion ofbusiness combination between LAN Colombia’s domestic and international operations, partially offset by the volcanic ash cloud that disrupted air traffic throughout the region.TAM on June 22, 2012.

During 2010 theIn 2012, LATAM’s combined yield for the international and domestic passenger businesses experienced a 6.8% increase, reflecting the recovery and growth in demand experienced in 2010 against 2009 when yields experienced a 16.2% decrease compared with 2008, as a resultpro forma revenues increased 1.0% to US$11,065.9 million, representing 83.4% of the economic crisis that affected passenger demandCompany’s total pro forma annual revenues for air flights in 20092012.

Passenger revenues as reported increased 99.0% as traffic increased 94.4%, and a high comparison base in 2008 as fuel surcharges incorporated in the yields drove thecapacity increased 93.8%. The increase in fuel prices during that year.passenger figures is mainly explained by the business combination between LAN and TAM on June 22, 2012.

Overall, despite adverse and uncontrollable factors during 2010, 2011 and 2012, such as fuel prices increaseprice increases and natural disasters, market conditions on theour broad passenger businessnetworks and flexibility to manage capacity have provided us with opportunities to advance on our strategic development plans and expand our operations.operations during this period. We addressed these challenges by taking advantage of our integrated business model, efficient operations, continued customer focus, and flexible capacity management. Customer focus has provided a key tool to address competitive challenges as well as to successfully enter new markets.

We also took advantage of our flexibility to adapt capacity quickly in response to demand shocks or market opportunities. We actively manage our capacity by transferring capacity between routes or adding new aircraft when necessary. This enabled us to rapidly respond by adding capacity in the Peruvian domestic market during 2004 and supporting the launch of LAN Argentina’s domestic operations in 2005, as well as launching the latter’s international operations in October 2006, launching domestic operations in Ecuador in April 2009 and launching Colombian domestic operations in November 2010.

These opportunistic actions fit in with our long-term development strategy, which is aimed at consolidating LAN as the preferred carrier in South America. This plan incorporates development of domestic, regional and intercontinental routes in the markets we serve. Continuous monitoring of demand trends and competitive activity has allowed us to identify opportunities and, as a consequence, additional capacity has also been allocated to operations to the South Pacific, Europe and the United States, as well as to specific regional routes. We also shifted capacity among our routes in order to better match seasonal patterns in flights to the United States and to other destinations. Further refinements to our itineraries were also implemented in order to improve connectivity between our operations and those of our partners.

During 2011 we experienced a significant operating impact dueWe continue to the presence of volcanic ash resulting from the eruption of the Puyehue volcano in southern Chile during the month of June. The displacement of ashes periodically affected operations in Argentina, southern Chile and our South Pacific route to Australia and New Zealand. Although the volcanic activity has been reduced, it is highly unpredictable. Our focus during this emergency was to maintain the safety of our operations, resulting in tactical cancellations on the affected routes based on available information. In addition, our commercial policies have focused on providing maximum flexibility for rescheduling flights, in order to avoid an impact on demand. Overall, we estimate a negative impact of US$36.6 million dollars as a result of decreased revenue, passenger compensations and higher fuel costs due to itinerary changes.

LAN’s flexibility and broad passenger network also allowed us to manage the negative impact of the catastrophic earthquake that struck Chile in February 2010, causing significant damage to the terminal building at the Santiago International Airport and affecting all air travel in and out of the country. With no alternative airport in the Santiago Metropolitan Region, commercial passenger operations were suspended for three days, and were re-launched on March 2, 2010 with provisional facilities. LAN operated with reduced capacity out of Santiago until the terminal building was fully operational on March 28, 2010. LAN estimates the net impact of decreased passenger operations due to the earthquake were approximately US$30 million in 2010. Cargo operations were not materially affected by the earthquake, nor were the passenger operations of LAN or its subsidiaries in Peru, Ecuador and Argentina.

We have also enhancedenhance our regional network by selectively adding new destinations and launching new routes. Since 2004, we have been developing an intra-regional hub in Lima. We have launched several routesLima that enableenables us to effectively use Lima as a connecting point for passengers traveling between Mexico City, Bogotá, Caracas, Guayaquil, Quito, Buenos Aires, La Paz, Santa Cruz, Sao Paulo and Santiago de Chile. In 2007, we began direct service between Lima and Madrid; in 2008, we began service to Medellín, Colombia (with one stop in Quito);Madrid and in 2009, we began service from Lima to Cali via Quito and from Lima to Punta Cana, Cancun and Cordoba. Regarding long-haul operations, in July 2010, LAN Peruwe launched four weekly frequencies between Lima and San Francisco, with connections from Sao Paulo, Santiago and Buenos Aires. During the first half of 2010 the Company implemented various new passenger destinations. We plan to continue growing our operation in Lima by increasing the number of flight frequencies we operate on these routes as we did during 2011 with Miami and Bogota and also by adding new destinations.

On May 10, 2010, LAN Argentina launched three daily flights between Santiago and Aeroparque airport in Buenos Aires and in June 2010 it launched services between Aeroparque and Sao Paulo, among others. In December 2011, LAN Argentina’s permits for regional flights from Aeroparque were cancelled by the Argentinean Aeronautical Authority, while the affected flight Buenos Aires – Santiago was reassigned to Ezeiza Airport. In both the Chilean and Peruvian domestic markets, total domestic traffic increased during 2011, driven mainly by the positive macroeconomic scenarios in both markets and by attractive fare structures in line with the model for short-haul operations that we implemented in 2007.

Between 2005 and 2011, LAN Argentina increased the number of Argentine domestic destinations from six to fifteen and, based on internal estimates, our market share was approximately 30% as of December 2011.

By the end of 2008, Ecuador’s aeronautical authority, CNAC, granted LAN Ecuador permission to operate domestic flights within the country. These operations started in April 2009 with flights between the cities of Quito and Guayaquil. As of December 2011, LAN Ecuador was operating sixty-three flights a week between Guayaquil and Quito, one2012, because of the most heavily traveled routesweak economic situation in Europe, LATAM reduced capacity to that region and increased frequencies to the United States, including a new LAN Colombia route from Bogotá-Miami and a new TAM route from Rio de Janeiro-Orlando, in order to promote Miami as a getaway from Latin America as well as fourteen flights a week from Quito to Cuenca and seven flights a week from Guayaquil to Cuenca. In September 2010, LAN Ecuador launched regular service to the Galapagos Islands, offering a daily flight from both Quito and Guayaquil. Finally, in November 2011, LAN Ecuador incorporated two additional weekly flights to the airport of San Cristobal in the Galapagos Islands. LAN Ecuador had 25.6% market share in the domestic market of Ecuador as of December 2011.United States.

Cargo Operations

Our cargo operations depend on exports from and imports to South America and are, therefore, affected by economic conditions, foreign exchange rates, changes in international trade, the health of particular industries, competition and fuel prices (which we usually pass on to our customers through a cargo fuel surcharge). Cargo revenues are also affected by our capacity, traffic, load factors and yield. Our capacity is measured in terms of available ton kilometers, or ATKs, which represents the number of tons available for the transportation of cargo, multiplied by the kilometers flown. We measure traffic in revenue ton kilometers, or RTKs, as the amount of cargo loads (measured in tons) multiplied by the number of kilometers flown. Load factors represent RTKs (traffic) as a percentage of ATKs (capacity), or the percentage of our cargo capacity that is actually used to transport cargo for our customers. Finally, we use yield, or revenue from cargo operations divided by RTKs, to measure the average

amount that our customers pay to transport one ton of cargo one kilometer. See “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data.” The following discussion of revenue drivers in our cargo operations including changes in capacity, traffic, load factors and yields, is based on our unaudited pro forma operating results for 2012 and 2011 where specified.

We operate in many of the major import and export markets in South America. In particular, in 2012, the agreements implemented relative to the TAM’s cargo network in Brazil significantly expanded our cargo capacity and route coverage. At the end of 2012, this additional cargo capacity represented approximately 32% of all LATAM Cargo capacity. In addition to providing additional cargo routes within Brazil, the combination of LAN and TAM also provided additional international destinations, including Milan, Paris and London.

The relative size of inbound and outbound flows to a particular market or route is a key element in cargo operations, as the unidirectional nature of freight flows requires airlines to create routes that combine origin-destination pairs that feature complementary freight flows. Changes in macroeconomic conditions may lead to major fluctuations in cargo flows to and from Latin America, therefore requiring continuous route and capacity adjustments.

We have designed our operations, route network and commercial strategies with the flexibility required to respond to changing conditions. The flexibility that thisour integrated business model allows based on adaptation to changes in market trends was key for LAN’sLATAM’s operations in 2009, when the business was affected by the contraction of import and export markets in response to the global economic crisis. In addition, LAN Cargo saw a sharp dropcrisis and continued contraction in salmon exports from Chile as a result of an outbreak of the ISA virus. During 2009 LANvirus during 2007. LATAM received two Boeing 777 freighters in 2009, at a time where there was a decrease in demand in cargo operations. These aircraft were utilized to increase capacity, mainly on routes between South America and Europe. Not only did the incorporation of theseEurope and to expand LATAM’s cargo planes increase capacity, but they also helped the company expand its coverage beyond the region and strengthen its cargo services to Europe; LAN currently operates routes between Frankfurt and Brazil, Argentina and Chile, Ecuador and Colombia and Amsterdam and Frankfurt.

During 2009 the Company achieved an important step in regional expansion. Colombia is Latin America’s largest market for exports by air transport to the United States, exporting an estimated 167,000 tons annually. In March 2009, LAN Cargo launched LANCO, after successfully obtaining the necessary operational and technical certification. It launched its services with two latest-generation Boeing 767-300Fs, with a capacity for 54 tons of freight, connecting the cities of Bogotá and Medellin with Miami.

In addition, in March 2009, the Company’s cargo subsidiary in Brazil, ABSA, began operations in the country’s domestic market, with one flight daily - from Monday to Friday - between the cities of Sao Paulo and Manaus. On this route, ABSA operates an advanced-technology Boeing 767-300F with a capacity of 54 tons. This route accounts for a large part of Brazil’s airfreight traffic. Manaus is the country’s fourth largest city in terms of GDP, with a large number of companies, principally in the electronics sector, in its industrial pole. The special tax incentives offered by the Amazon capital of Manaus as part of efforts to promote the area’s development, make it an attractive alternative for exporter and importer clients. During 2010, the Company opened a route between Sao Paulo and Fortaleza and Sao Paulo and Recife. During 2011 the Company added a route between Sao Paulo, Belem and Manaus.

Regarding the cargo fleet, during 2012, the Company expects delivery of 2 Boeing 777F freighter aircraft during the second half of the year.

Europe. As the economy started to recover at the end of 2009, and continuing through 2010 and 2011, LANLATAM was able to take advantage of the new capacity and growth opportunities in various markets; as a result,markets in 2010 and 2011. Accordingly, the cargo business played an important role in driving LAN’sLATAM’s revenue growth in 2010 and 2011.

In 2012, however, a slowdown in world macroeconomic conditions significantly impacted cargo volumes, specifically in Europe and Asia. This slowdown also affected South America, mainly in the southbound routes where LATAM Cargo traffic increased 11.5% between 2010 and 2011, from 3,239 million in cargo revenue ton kilometers in 2010 to 3,612 million cargo revenue ton kilometers in 2011.carries imports of value added goods into Brazil. This improvement was positive comparedweak macroeconomic environment also brought new competition to the 0.8%region during 2012, with airlines carriers such as Emirates and Cargo Lux, increasing the available capacity in the region and adding pressure to cargo yields.

As a result of these factors, pro forma cargo traffic decreased by 2.4% between 2011 and 2012. This decrease experienced bywas broadly in line with the 1.5% decrease international air cargo industry, whiletraffic and the Latin-American1.2% decline in Latin American cargo segment experiencedtraffic in 2012. Yields (on a 1.5% growth. The Companypro forma basis) decreased 3.9% compared to 2011, reflecting not only the decline in demand on routes to Latin America, especially Brazil, but also increased competitive pressures from regional and international cargo carriers. In response to these conditions, LATAM decreased its capacity by approximately 12.4%0.1%, resulting in a 0.51.3 point decrease in its pro forma cargo load factor to 69.6%. The increase58.7% in capacity was mainly driven by LAN’s incorporation of two new Boeing 767-300F freighters in December 2010 and January 2011. These aircraft were assigned to boost growth in the Latin American, United States West Coast and Mexican markets, as well as by higher utilization of the freighter fleet. LAN Cargo2012. LATAM’s cargo operations transported 8751,154 thousand tons of freight (pro forma) in 2011, an increase2012, a decrease of 12.2%1% as compared to 2010.the total (pro forma) freight transported in 2011.

In 2011, LAN’sAs a result of decreased traffic and yields, LATAM’s pro forma cargo revenues rosedecreased 6.2% to US$1,940 million in 23.1% to US$1.577 million,2012, representing 27.6%14.6% of the Company’s total pro forma annual revenues. The growthrevenues in 2012.

Cargo revenues also reflects the 10.4%as reported increased 10.6% in 2012, resulting from a 12.0% increase in traffic, and a 24.2% increase in cargo yields that year.capacity in 2012, which is primarily due to the business combination between LAN and TAM on June 22, 2012.

Cost Structure

LAN’sLATAM Airlines Group’s costs are generally driven by the size of our operations, fuel prices, fleet costs and exchange rates. Our operating expenses are calculated in accordance with IFRS and comprise the sum of the line items “cost of sales” plus “distribution costs” plus “administrative expenses” plus “other operating expenses”, as shown on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income. These operating expenses include wages and benefits, fuel, depreciation and amortization, commissions to agents, aircraft rentals, other rental and landing fees, passenger services, airdraft maintenance, and other operating expenses. The following discussion of cost drivers is based on our unaudited pro forma operating results where specified.

During 2012, LATAM’s pro forma operating expenses increased 7.2%, mainly as a result of a 9.7% increase in pro forma fuel prices, which caused an increase of 12.6% in pro forma fuel expenses (or US$535.5 million in increased fuel expenses) and contributed to the 3.7% increase in cost per ASK equivalent. In addition, fuel expenses in 2011 benefitted from the recognition of a tax credit (PIS and COFINS) in the amount of US$323 million. Excluding fuel costs, the increase in pro forma cost per ASK equivalent over this period was 1.6%. As an airline, we are subject to fluctuations in costs that are outside our control, particularly fuel prices and exchange rates. However, we manage part of our exposure to changes in fuel prices through a fuel-hedging policy and the use of pass-through mechanisms on both the passenger and cargo businesses. For more information see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Risk of Fluctuations in Jet Fuel Prices”.Prices.” Personnel expenses are another significant component of our overall costs. Because a significant portion of our labor costs is denominated in Chilean pesos and in Brazilian reais, appreciation of the pesothese currencies against the dollar as well as increases in local inflation rates can result in increased costs in dollar terms and can negatively affect our results. However, this cost pressure is mitigated by the partial natural hedge between the currencies of denomination of our total operating revenues and expenses. LATAM also paid higher wages and salaries in 2012 due to a higher average headcount (on a pro forma basis, excluding the addition of TAM employees) that is consistent with the Company’s operational expansion, and the impact of the appreciation of Latin American currencies in 2012.

CommissionCommissions paid to travel and cargo agents also composecomprise a significant cost to us. We compete with other airlines over the amount of commission we pay per sale, particularly in connection with special programs and marketing efforts, and to maintain competitive incentives with travel agents. In February 2007Chile, Ecuador, Argentina, Peru and Colombia we reducedpay 1% commission paidto travel agencies and agents. In Brazil, the industry standard is not to provide any commissions directly to travel agencies and agents, but airlines pay other incentives to agents in Chile for economy class ticketorder to maintain a competitive relationship with this important sales from 6% to 1%. Between 2007 and 2008, commissions were also reduced to 1% in Ecuador, Argentina and Peru.force.

Fleet related expenses, namely aircraft rentals and depreciation are another significant cost. These costs are mainly fixed and can be reduced on a per unit basis by achieving higher daily aircraft utilization rates. Following the combination of LAN and TAM, the percentage of our fleet under operating leases increased from 34.8% in 2011 to 37.6% in 2012, increasing our aircraft rental expenses by 7.6% on a pro forma basis in 2012 and increasing our depreciation expense by 0.05% on a pro forma basis in 2012.

During 2011, LAN’s operating costs increased in 35.4%, mainly impacted by an increase of 28.8% in fuel prices which led to US$588.1 million in increased fuel expenses and contributed to a 18.0% increase inTo manage our cost per ATK (a key industry metric). Excluding fuel costs, the increase in cost per ATK over this period was 10.6%. In addition, the Company recognized a US$39.9 million fuel hedge gain compared to a US$1.0 million fuel hedge gain in 2010.

Apart from higher expenditure on fuel, the Company paid higher wages and salaries due to a higher average headcount that is in-line with the Company’s operational expansion, and the impact of the appreciation of Latin American currencies in 2011.

Westructure, we have launched various efficiency-related initiatives aimed at reducing fuel consumption and increasingly incorporating efficient aircraft into the fleet.

Higher aircraft utilization has been an important source of improved efficiency. Our long-haul passenger and cargo aircraft are used, on average, over 13.0 hours per day (Boeing 767-300 12.8 hrs per day and Airbus A340 14.2 hours per day). Our utilization strategy in 20112012 was mostly designed in concertcoupled with the addition of new passenger routes to

our network, which enabled us to leverage our human and physical assets for increased efficiency as well as increasing frequencies. In our domestic operations we have also worked consistently to improve our cost structure. This process has included initiatives such as the modification of short-haul service standards, which were implemented in late 2005 and modified further in 2007 as a result of the new business model on domestic routes, enabling us to reduce passenger service expenses. The key elements of this newour domestic business model have been a reduction infocused on improving short-haul service standards, reducing sales and distribution costs through higher Internet penetration and reduced agency commission, a fasterimproving turnaround time, and increasedincreasing self check-in service through web check-in and kiosks at airports.

In addition, during 2009 we implementedbegan to implement LEAN, a system for improving our processes by eliminating activities that do not add value to processes (thus increasing the value of each activity and suppressing those that are superfluous), thereby allowing us to reduce costs, and increase customer satisfaction. In addition, during 2011To improve fuel efficiency, in 2009 we continuedbegan a program to install winglets on LAN’s existing Boeing 767 aircraft fleet, which we continue to install as we receive new 767 aircraft. The installation of winglets on our Boeing 767 aircraft fleet, achievinghelped us to achieve average fuel efficiencies of approximately 5% per aircraft. To mitigateaircraft per year since implementation.

Cost of sales as reported in our financial statements increased 87.4% in 2012 as compared to 2011, mainly as a result of the environmental impact of our operations we strive to operate in a sustainable manner by reducing our fuel consumptionbusiness combination between LAN and related emissions.TAM on June 22, 2012.

Outlook

Our long-term strategy is aimed at consolidating LAN’sLATAM Airlines Group’s position as the mainpreferred passenger and cargo airline group in South America. The creation of LATAM Airlines Group in 2012, following the combination of LAN and TAM, has created the largest airline group in Latin America, with the largest fleet and number of destinations and, we believe, superior service standards. This combination has enabled LATAM to serve all major domestic markets across Latin America and has positioned us to compete in an increasingly consolidating global airline industry.

We will continue to expand our network by further developing our existing routes, adding new destinations, developing new alliances, and entering new markets. We expect our strong brand recognition, andcoupled with a continuous effort to improve service standards to drive increased customer preference, ultimately leading to strong market shares in the markets we serve. Our product and service design is aimed at providing passengers and cargo customers with differentiated offerings that provide valuable solutions to the needs of each of our customer types. We also aim to have products and services that evolve together with changes in technology, market conditions and competitive actions. We plan to maintain a highly competitive cost structure by leveraging our cost-conscious culture, incorporating new technologies and practices, and by identifying and implementing adequate cost-reduction and efficiency-related initiatives. We believe that a focus on flexibility will enable us to adequatelyeffectively react to changing market conditions. Finally, a healthy financial structure will allow us to effectively fund our growth, enhance our strategic development and reinforce our customer appeal.

Our results will be mainly determined by the expansion of our current network, the evolution of our market share in our main markets, our level of success in entering new markets, the successful combination between LAN and TAM and achievement of the expected synergies, the continued implementation of new efficiency-related programs, the continued implementation of our business model for short-haul operations, and fuel price levels.

 

We plan to increase frequencies on long-haul flights out of Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, and Argentina,Brazil, expand international routes operated from Colombia, and eventually, add new destinations in the United States and Europe. We plan to reinforce our regional network through the addition of new frequencies on our current routes and the addition of new destinations. We plan in a next step to expand international operations through LAN Colombia. As of February 29, 2012, LAN Colombia operates only one international route from El Dorado airport in Bogotá to Miami. We will also seek to enter into new alliances in both the passenger and cargo business, especially to build up our presence in new markets.

 

Competitive activity in key markets has increased gradually in recent years, and we expect it to continue doing so in the future. Nevertheless, we expect to maintain solid market shares based on offering attractive value propositions that combine broad international and domestic networks, a strong customer focus and a competitive cost base.pricing.

 

We are also working on increasingto increase our efficiency by streamlining our support processes, reducing commercial costs, and by continuing with the implementation of our newdomestic business model on short-haul operations. Further enhancementsefficiencies should arise from economies of scale, especially as solid growth in the passenger business accompanied by controlled fixed costs will serve to dilutereduce our fixed costscost base. In both the passenger and the cargo business, efficiencies arebusinesses, we also expected to come from the replacement ofexpect increased efficiency as we replace older aircraft with new and more fuel-efficient Boeing 787 and Boeing 777 models and the Airbus A350, and from fuel efficiency-related initiatives such as installing winglets on the B767 fleet as well as continuingfleet.

Overall, we believe that these initiatives will enable us to adjust aircraft configurationsuccessfully respond to market demand.growth opportunities, maintain a solid competitive position, and manage operating expenses.

Our financial performance will also continue to be highly dependent onsignificantly affected by jet fuel prices. These prices rose significantly until mid-2008, which led to a sharp rise in our fuel expenditures, but significantly declined in 2009. Presently, there is a trend towards increases in jetDuring 2010 and 2011 fuel prices becauserecovered from the 2009 decline and again rose significantly, as a result of the increased demand caused by the 2010 recovery in the global economy coupled with geopolitical conflicts that affected global fuel supplysupply. In 2012 jet fuel prices fluctuated in the last year.a stable range, having a lower impact in our fuel expenses as compared to prior years. Although we have implemented a number of strategies to mitigate the impact of the volatility of fuel prices, including financial hedging, the use of fuel surcharges, and tactical reduction of capacity, it is unlikely that we will be able to fully protect ourselves against the volatility of fuel costs.

Overall, we believe that these initiatives will enable us to successfully respond to growth opportunities, maintain a solid competitive position, and enhance our distinct cost performance.

Results of Operation

The discussion of LATAM Airlines Group’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2012 (actual) compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 compares the audited consolidated results of the LATAM Airlines Group for the 2012 fiscal year (which includes TAM’s financial results from June 23, 2012) to the audited consolidated results of the LATAM Airlines Group for the 2011 fiscal year (which represents the historical results of LAN). Accordingly, the acquisition of TAM during the year ended December 31, 2012 is a significant factor affecting the comparability of the historical financial results for the 2012 and 2011 fiscal years.

The discussion of LATAM Airlines Group’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2012 (pro forma) compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 (pro forma) below is on the basis of the LATAM Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information. The Unaudited LATAM Pro Forma Information has been prepared using the purchase method of accounting with LAN treated as the acquirer of TAM, and giving effect to the combination as if it had been consummated on January 1, 2011. The discussion of LATAM’s results on a pro forma basis is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations or the consolidated financial position of LATAM would have been had the proposed combination occurred on the dates assumed, nor are the pro forma results necessarily indicative of future consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position of LATAM.

LATAM has incurred significant costs to date associated with integrating the operations of LAN and TAM, which are reflected in the LATAM Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information, and expects to continue to incur significant integration costs. The Unaudited LATAM Pro Forma Financial Information does not reflect the costs of any integration activities or benefits that may result from realization of future cost savings from operating efficiencies or revenue synergies expected to result from the proposed combination. You should read the discussion of LATAM’s unaudited pro forma results below in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as “Presentation of Information” and “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data.”

The discussion of LAN’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 compares the historical audited consolidated results of LAN for such periods.

LATAM Airlines Group Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2012 (actual) compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (actual)

The following table sets forth certain income statement data for Lan Airlines.LATAM Airlines Group, for the year ended December 31, 2012 (including TAM’s results from June 23, 2012), and for LATAM Airlines Group, for the year ended December 31, 2011, which represents the historical income statement data of LAN. For certain operating data during these periods, see “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data.”

 

  Year Ended December 31,       Year Ended December 31, 
  2011 2010 2009 2011 2010 2009 11/10 10/09   2012 2011 2012 2011 2012/2011
%  change
 
  (in US$ millions, except per share
and capital stock data)
 As a percentage of total
operating revenues
 %
change
   (in US$ millions, except per
share and capital stock data)
 As a percentage of  total
operating revenues
 

Consolidated Results of Income by Function

               

Operating revenues

               

Passenger

   4,008.9    3,109.8    2,623.6    71.8    70.8    74.6    28.9    18.5     7,978.7    4,008.9    82.1    71.8    99.0  

Cargo

   1,576.5    1,280.7    895.6    28.2    29.2    25.4    23.1    43.0     1,743.5    1,576.5    17.9    28.2    10.6  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating revenues

   5,585.4    4,390.5    3,519.2    100.0    100.0    100.0    27.2    24.8     9,722.2    5,585.4    100.0    100.0    74.1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cost of sales

   (4,078.6  (3,012.7  (2,522.8  (73.0  (68.6  (71.7  35.4    19.4     (7,642.6  (4,078.6  (78.6  (73.0  87.4  

Gross margin

   1,506.8    1,377.8    996.4    27.0    31.4    28.3    9.4    38.3     2,079.5    1,506.8    21.4    27.0    38.0  

Other operating income

   132.8    132.8    136.4    2.4    3.0    3.9    0.0    (2.6   220.2    132.8    2.3    2.4    65.8  

Distribution costs

   (479.8  (383.5  (327.0  (8.6  (8.7  (9.3  25.1    17.3     (803.6  (479.8  (8.3  (8.6  67.5  

Administrative expenses

   (405.7  (331.8  (269.6  (7.3  (7.6  (7.7  22.3    23.1     (869.5  (405.7  (8.9  (7.3  114.3  

Other operating expenses

   (214.4  (172.4  (100.5  (3.8  (3.9  (2.9  24.4    71.5     (311.8  (214.4  (3.2  (3.8  45.4  

Financial Income

   14.5    14.9    18.2    0.3    (0.3  (0.5  (2.7  (18.1

Financial income

   77.5    14.5    0.8    0.3    434.5  

Financial costs (from non-financial activities)

   (139.1  (155.3  (153.1  (2.5  (3.5  (4.4  (10.4  1.4     (294.6  (139.1  (3.0  (2.5  111.8  

Earning on investments (equity method)

   0.5    0.1    0.3    0.0    0.0    0.0    400.0    (66.7   1.0    0.5    0.0    0.0    100.0  

Exchange rate differences

   (0.3  13.8    (11.2  0.0    0.3    (0.3  (102.2  (223.2)-    66.7    (0.3  0.7    0.0    NN  

Result of indexation units

   0.1    0.1    (0.6  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (116.7)- 

Negative goodwill

   —      —      —      —      0.0    0.0    —      —    

Other net earnings (losses)

   (33.0  5.4    (11.7  (0.6  1.0    (0.3  (711.1  (146.2)- 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes

   382.4    502.0    277.5    6.8    11.4    7.9    (23.8  80.9  

Income tax

   (61.8  (81.1  (44.5  (1.1  (1.8  (1.3  (23.8  82.2  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income for the period

   320.6    420.9    233.0    5.7    9.6    6.6    (23.8  80.6  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income for the period attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   320.2    419.7    231.1    5.7    9.6    6.6    (23.7  80.6  

Income for the period attributable to non-controlling interest

   0.4    1.2    1.9    0.0    0.1    0.1    (66.7  (36.8

Net income for the period

   320.6    420.9    233.0    5.7    9.6    6.6    (23.8  81.6  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings per share

         

Basic earnings per share (US$)

   0.9434    1.2388    0.6822       

Diluted earnings per share (US$)

   0.9426    1.2353    0.6822       

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2012  2011  2012  2011  2012/2011
%  change
 
   (in US$ millions, except per
share and capital stock data)
  As a percentage of  total
operating revenues
  

Result of indexation units

   (0.0  0.1    0.0    0.0    (100

Negative goodwill

   —      —      —      —     

Other gains/(losses)

   (38.8  (33.0  (0.4  (0.6  17.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   126.6    382.4    1.3    6.8    (66.9

Income tax expense

   (102.2  (61.8  (1.1  (1.1  65.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the period

   24.4    320.6    0.3    5.7    (92.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income for the period attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   11.0    320.2    0.1    5.7    (96.6

Income for the period attributable to non-controlling interests

   13.4    0.4    0.1    0.0    NN  

Net income for the period

   24.4    320.6    0.3    5.7    (92.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share

      

Basic earnings per share (US$)

   0.0266    0.9434      (97.2

Diluted earnings per share (US$)

   0.0266    0.9426      (97.2

Net Income

Net income for the period decreased 92.4% from US$320.6 million in 2011 to US$24.4 million in 2012. Net income attributable to the parent company’s equity holders decreased 96.6% from US$320.2 million in 2011 to US$11.0 million in 2012. Results for the 2012 year were negatively impacted by a net loss of US$45.2 million related to the business combination with TAM and integration costs of US$47.0 million, due to the combination of LAN and TAM on June 22, 2012. In addition, LATAM recorded an accounting charge of US$70.4 million related to the increase in the Chilean corporate tax rate from 17% to 20% during 2012.

Our total operating revenues increased 74.1% during 2012, reflecting the consolidation of TAM’s revenues from June 23, 2012, as well as solid demand trends in our passenger business. The 2012 increase in operating revenues was attributable to a 99.0% increase in passenger revenues, and a 10.6% in cargo revenues. Passenger and cargo revenues accounted for 82% and 18% of total operating revenues in 2012, respectively.

Passenger traffic and capacity in 2012 increased significantly following the consolidation of TAM’s domestic and international operations. Other capacity increases were mainly focused on domestic routes within Chile, regional routes within Latin America, and long-haul routes to the United States, and were partially offset by decreased capacity on Brazilian domestic routes.

Operating expenses also increased as a result of our increased operations (including a larger fleet) following the combination with TAM on June 22, 2012.

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues in 2012 totaled US$9,722.2 million, a 74.1% increase as compared to total operating revenues of US$5,585.4 million in 2011. Our consolidated passenger revenues increased 99.0% to US$7,978.7 million in 2012 from US$4,008.9 million in 2011, primarily as a result of the consolidation of TAM’s revenue from June 23, 2012. These consolidated revenues incorporate US$3,449.6 million as a result of the business combination with TAM. Excluding this effect, the increase in passenger revenues is mainly attributable to an increase of 12.0% in passenger capacity, as measured in ASKs, and a 0.9% increase in unit revenue per ASK.

Cargo revenues increased 10.6%, to US$1,743.5 million in 2012 from US$1,576.5 million in 2011, also as a result of the consolidation of TAM’s cargo revenues from June 23, 2012. These consolidated Cargo revenues incorporate US$195.8 million as a result of the combination with TAM. Excluding this effect, cargo revenues decreased 1.8%

Other operating revenues also increased in 2012 by US$87.4 million, from US$132.8 million to US$220.2 million, due primarily to the sale of two properties owned by Inmobiliaria Aeronautica S.A. an affiliate of LATAM, and the sale of a Boeing 767-200 and three Airbus A318s. As a result of the combination with TAM, US$50.4 million in other operating revenue relating to TAM has been included in our consolidated results.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales in 2012 totaled US$7,642.6 million, representing an 87.4% increase as compared to cost of sales of US$4,078.6 million in 2011, mainly as a result of increased operations due to the consolidation of TAM’s costs from June 23, 2012. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of sales increased from 73.0% in 2011 to 78.6 % in 2012.

The increase in cost of sales was driven by higher aircraft fuel expenses, which totaled US$3,434.6 million in 2012, a 96.3% increase as compared to aircraft fuel expenses of US$1,750.1 million in 2011. Fuel expenses increased mainly due to a 68.7% increase in consumption related to the incorporation of TAM’s operations from June 23, 2012. Excluding this effect, the increase reflects a rise of 7.4% in prices and 6.1% in consumption. In addition, LATAM recognized a net loss of US$1.8 million in fuel hedging, compared to the gain of US$39.9 million in 2011.

Depreciation and amortization increased by US$388.4 million of which US$318.1 million is due to the combination with TAM. This represents an increase of 94.0% mainly due to the incorporation in 2012 under property, plant and equipment of all of TAM’s fleet (including new TAM fleet deliveries in 2012). Excluding this effect, the increase was mainly due to the addition to the LAN fleet of three Airbus A319 aircraft, seven A320 Airbus aircraft, nine Boeing 767 aircraft, three Boeing 787 aircraft, four Boeing 777 aircraft and two Boeing 777F aircraft during 2012.

Other rental and landing fees increased by US$381.0 million, of which US$334.5 million was as a result of the combination with TAM. Excluding this effect, the increase is largely due to higher charter aircraft rentals and aeronautical charges and handling fees, in line with the increase in the size of the LAN fleet during the year detailed above. This increase was partially offset by lower costs of aviation insurance.

Aircraft maintenance expenses increased by 63.2%, from US$182.4 million in 2011 to US$297.6 million in 2012, with US$77 million due to the combination with TAM. Excluding this effect, the increase is due to the increase in the size of the LAN fleet during the year detailed above.

Aircraft rentals increased by US$138.8 million, primarily due to an increase of US$133.5 million in aircraft rentals as a result of the combination with TAM. In addition, LATAM newly leased four Airbus A320 aircraft. This increase is partially offset by the return of three Boeing 737s and two Boeing 767s.

Passenger service expenses increased by 76.3%, to US$239.8 million in 2012 compared to US$136.0 million in 2011. This increase was primarily due to the effect of the combination with TAM, which added US$92.1 million to the passenger service expenses. Excluding this effect, the increase is primarily due to a 16.4% increase in the number of passengers transported, partially offset by lower passenger compensation payments.

As a result of the above, gross margin increased 38.0% from US$1,506.8 million in 2011 to US$2,079.5 million in 2012, as increases in total revenues in 2012 following the combination of LAN and TAM were greater than the increased costs of sales associated with the consolidation of TAM’s operations.

Other Consolidated Results

Other operating income increased in 2012 by US$87.4 million, from US$132.8 million to US$220.2 million, due primarily to the sale of two properties owned by Inmobiliaria Aeronautica S.A. and the sale of a Boeing 767-200 and three Airbus A318s, which together amounted to approximately US$29 million. As a result of the combination with TAM, US$50.4 million in other operating revenue relating to TAM has been included in our consolidated results.

Financial income increased to US$77.5 million in 2012 from US$14.5 million in 2011, due to a higher average cash balance during the period, following the consolidation of TAM’s results from June 23, 2012.

Distribution costs increased 67.5% from US$479.8 million in 2011 to US$803.6 million in 2011, as a result of the consolidation of TAM’s results from June 23, 2012.

Administrative expenses increased 114.3% from US$405.7 million in 2011 to US$869.5 million in 2012, due to the higher number of employees following the combination of LAN and TAM in 2012.

Other operating expenses increased 45.4% from US$214.4 million in 2011 to US$311.8 million in 2012, as a result of higher sales costs, advertising and marketing expenses and costs related to tours and travel services, related to the integration of TAM’s operations from June 23, 2012.

Financial costs (from non-financial activities) increased by 111.8% to US$294.6 million in 2012 from US$139.1 million in 2011 due to higher average long-term debt related to fleet financing mainly related to the consolidation of TAM’s fleet.

Exchange rate differences increased from an expense of US$0.3 million in 2011 to a gain of US$66.6 million in 2012. The 2012 amount is primarily due to the consolidation of TAM operations from June 23, 2012, which are substantially conducted in Brazilian reais.

Under other gains (losses), the Company recorded a net loss of US$38.8 million in 2012, mainly due to aircraft sale and redelivery costs.

Income tax expenses increased by 65.4%, totaling US$102.2 million in 2012 as compared to US$61.8 million in 2011. For more information, see “—Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Taxes” below and Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

LATAM Airlines Group Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2012 (Pro forma) compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (Pro forma)

The following table sets forth certain pro forma income statement data for LATAM Airlines Group. See “—Pro Forma Adjustments” for further information. For certain operating data during these periods, see “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—LATAM Pro Forma Financial Information.”

   Year Ended December 31, 
   (on a Pro Forma Basis) 
   2012  2011  2012  2011  2012/2011 
   

(in millions of US$, except per share

and capital stock data)

  As a percentage of total operating
revenues
  % change 

Operating Revenues

      

Passenger

   11,066.0    10,960.7    85.1    84.1    1.0  

Cargo

   1,939.8    2,067.6    14.9    15.9    (6.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Operating revenues

   13,005.7    13,028.3    100.0    100.0    (0.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cost of sales

   (10,564.8  (9,891.1  (81.2  (75.9  6.8  

Gross Margin

   2,440.9    3,137.2    18.8    24.1    (22.2

Other operating income

   265.4    283.0    2.0    2.2    (6.2

Distribution costs

   (1,059.7  (1,020.2  (8.1  (7.8  3.9  

Administrative expenses

   (1,139.0  (1,043.7  (8.8  (8.0  9.1  

Other operating expenses

   (364.5  (318.8  (2.8  (2.4  14.3  

Other gains/(losses)

   (20.0  (3.7  (0.2  (0.0  444.8  

Financial income

   117.2    160.6    0.9    1.2    (27.0

Financial costs (from non-financial activities)

   (444.2  (452.6  (3.4  (3.5  (1.9

Earning on investments (equity method)

   1.0    0.5    0.0    0.0    112.2  

Exchange rate differences

   (290.1  (555.5  (2.2  (4.3  (47.8

Result of indexation units

   (0.0  0.1    (0.0  0.0    (117.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (493.0  186.9    (3.8  1.4    (363.7

Income tax expense

   74.0    (77.3  0.6    (0.6  (195.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) for the year

   (419.0  109.6    (3.2  0.8    (482.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) for the period attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   (445.4  49.8    (3.4  0.4    (994.4

Income for the period attributable to non-controlling interests

   26.5    59.8    0.2    0.5    (55.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the year

   (419.0  109.6    (3.2  0.8    (482.3

Earnings per share

      

Average number of Shares

   476,293,870    474,543,664     

Basic earnings per share (US$)

   (0.93518  0.10494     

Diluted earnings per share(US$)

   (0.93518  0.10488     

Net Income

Net income for the period decreased from US$109.6 million in 2011 to a net loss of US$419.0 million in 2012. Net income attributable to the parent company’s equity holders decreased from US$49.8 million in 2011 to a net loss of US$445.4 million in 2012. Results for the 2012 year were negatively impacted by an increase in fuel prices, a more challenging environment in the cargo business, the depreciation of the Brazilian real, and costs relating to the ongoing developement of LAN Colombia’s operations. Results for 2012 also include a US$70.4 million charge related to the increase in the Chilean corporate income tax rate from 17% to 20%, as well as a US$59.2 million of one-time transaction related costs resulting from the business combination between LAN and TAM that was completed on June 22, 2012.

The total operating revenues remained flat during 2012, reflecting a challenging environment in the cargo business and the impact of the 17% depreciation of the Brazilian real in the passenger business, which offset net increases in domestic and international passenger revenues. Passenger and cargo revenues accounted for approximately 85% and 15% of total operating revenues, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012.

During 2012, capacity increases in our passenger operations were focused mainly on domestic routes within Chile, regional routes within Latin America, and long-haul routes to the United States. This expansion was partially offset by decreased capacity in our domestic Brazilian operations as well as on long haul routes to Europe. Total passenger yields decreased mostly as a result of the restructuring of our operations in Brazil and the impact of the depreciation of the Brazilian real on our international and domestic Brazilian operations.

Operating expenses increased mainly due to higher fuel expenses of US$4,780.3 million in 2012, reflecting increased consumption of 2.7% and a 9.7% increase in fuel price (after hedges). The increase in fuel expenses period on period was also impacted by the recognition in 2011 of a tax credit of US$323 million. Higher aircraft maintenance expenses also impacted our operating expenses, mainly due to a larger fleet as well as increased aircraft redeliveries in 2012.

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues in 2012 totaled US$13,005.7 million, a 0.2% decrease as compared to total operating revenues of US$13,028.3 million in 2011. Our consolidated passenger revenues increased slightly to US$11,066.0 million in 2012 from US$10,960.7 million in 2011, as an increase of 2.3 percentage points in our consolidated load factor to 78.2% (resulting from a 7.8% increase in traffic which outpaced the 4.6% increase in capacity) was partially offset by a 6.3% decrease in passenger yields (from US¢11.4 to US¢10.7). Overall, unit revenues per ASK decreased 3.5%. Traffic grew as a result of a 15.7% increase in domestic traffic in LAN’s domestic markets, as well as for a 5.8% increase in domestic traffic within Brazil, and a 7.2% increase in international traffic. International traffic accounted for approximately 51.8% of our total passenger traffic during 2012.

Cargo revenues decreased 6.2%, to US$1,939.8 million in 2012 from US$2,067.6 million in 2011, mainly driven by a 3.9% decrease in yields (from US¢45.0 in 2011 to US¢43.2 in 2012), and a 2.4% decrease in traffic (from 4,598 million cargo RTKs in 2011 to 4,488 million cargo RTKs in 2012). In 2012, cargo traffic was impacted by a weak macroeconomic environment worldwide, that mainly affected imports to Brazil as well as the overall competitive environment in the region. This impact was partially offset by increasing exports from South American countries, which continued throughout the year. Cargo capacity remained virtually flat during 2012. As a consequence, load factors decreased from 59.8% in 2011 to 58.7% in 2012.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales in 2012 totaled US$10,564.8 million, representing a 6.8% increase as compared to cost of sales of US$9,891.1 million in 2011. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of sales increased from 75.9% in 2011 to 81.2% in 2012, mainly as a result of a higher fuel expense compared to 2011 and one-time costs related to the business combination between LAN and TAM.

The increase in cost of sales was driven by higher aircraft fuel expenses, which totaled US$4,780.3 million in 2012, a 12.6% increase as compared to aircraft fuel expenses of US$4,244.8 million in 2011. Fuel expenses increased period on period as a result of the recognition of a tax credit (PIS and COFINS) during 2011, in the amount of US$323.1 million. Excluding this impact fuel expenses would have increased 4.6%, mainly driven by a 1.9% increase in fuel prices, coupled with a 2.7% increase in consumption, in line with a larger fleet due to additions to the LAN fleet detailed above. The Company also recognized a US$1.8 million fuel hedge loss in 2012 compared to a US$39.9 million fuel hedge gain in 2011.

Fuel costs comprise the single largest category of our operating expenses. Over the last few years, our fuel consumption and operating expenses have increased due to the significant growth in our operations and to the increase in fuel prices as a result of economic and political factors. In 2012 the total fuel costs represented 36.3% of our total operating expenses. The into-wing (fuel price plus taxes and transportation costs) 2012 average final price was US$3.69 per gallon, representing a 9.7% increase from the 2011 average.

Depreciation and amortization remained flat as the effect of the incorporation in 2012 under property, plant and equipment of three new Airbus A319, seven new Airbus A320s, nine Boeing 767-300s, three Boeing 787-800, four Boeing 777-300, and two Boeing 777 freighters on our depreciation and amortization expense was offset by the retirement of 3 Airbus A318 aircraft from our fleet during 2012.

Aircraft maintenance expenses increased by 21.9%, from US$348.2 million in 2011 to US$424.4 million in 2012 mainly due to more aircraft redeliveries, which result in increased maintenance expenses for required checks prior to the return of such aircraft to lessors, as well as a larger fleet.

Aircraft rentals increased 7.6% due to the incorporation of 8 leased aircraft during the year.

Passenger service expenses totaled US$314.9 million in 2012 compared to US$336.2 million in 2011. This represented a 6.3% decrease that was driven by lower compensation to passengers, partially offset by an increase of 7.8% in the number of passenger transported.

As a result of the above, gross margin decreased 22.2% from US$3,137.2 million in 2011 to US$2,440.9 million in 2012.

Other Consolidated Results

Other operating income decreased to US$265.4 million in 2012 from US$283.0 million in 2011, mainly as a result of lower revenues from Multiplus during 2012.

Interest income decreased by 27.0% to US$117.2 million in 2012 from US$160.6 million in 2011, due to a lower average cash balance during the period.

Distribution costs increased 3.9% from US$1,020.2 million in 2011 to US$1,059.7 million in 2012. This increase was related to the 7.6% increase in the number of passengers transported, partially offset by lower commissions to agents (related to both passenger and cargo sales), which decreased 9.9% to US$417.1 million in 2012 from US$462.9 million in 2011, mainly related to lower sales in the cargo business, as well as lower cargo traffic.

Administrative expenses increased 12.0% from US$1,069.9 million in 2011 to US$1,198.1 million in 2012 due to higher wages of administrative personnel, as well as higher advertising and marketing costs.

Other operating expenses increased 14.3% from US$318.8 million in 2011 to US$364.5 million in 2012, as a result of a larger operation.

Financial costs (from non-financial activities) decreased by 1.9% to US$444.2 million in 2012 from US$452.6 million in 2011 despite a higher debt related to fleet financing in 2012, mainly due to adjustments in the fair value of some liabilities of TAM.

Exchange rate differences resulted in a loss of US$555.5 million in 2011 compared to a loss of US$290.1 million in 2012. This variation is mainly explained due to a depreciaton of the Brazilian real in 2012 compared to 2011, instead of the average appreciation of the Brazilian real in 2011 as compared to 2010.

Under other gains/(losses), the Company recorded a net loss of US$20.0 million in 2012, mainly due to aircraft sale and redelivery costs.

Income tax expenses represented a US$74.0 million benefit in 2012 as compared to an income tax expense of US$77.3 million in 2011. This increase was primarily the result of a negative pre-tax income, partially offset by an accounting charge of US$70.4 million related to the increase of the Chilean corporate tax rate from 17% to 20% in September 2012. For more information, see “—Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Taxes” below and Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Pro Forma Adjustments

The unaudited pro forma information has been prepared using the purchase method of accounting, with LAN treated as the acquirer of TAM. Under IFRS 3, there is a maximum period of one year from the acquisition date to finalize the purchase price allocation. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not concluded its purchase price allocation. As a result, there may be subsequent changes to the fair value of certain assets and liabilities accounted for in the business combination.

   For the year ended December 31, 2011 
   (on a pro forma basis) 
   LAN  TAM (a)  LATAM  Pro Forma
Adjustments
  Combined
Condensed
Pro Forma
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Operating revenues

   5,585,440    7,442,845    13,028,285    0    13,028,285  

Cost of sales(b,c,d,e)

   (4,078,598  (5,743,954  (9,822,552  (68,566  (9,891,118
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross Margin

   1,506,842    1,698,891    3,205,733    (68,566  3,137,167  

Other operating income

   132,804    150,212    283,016    0    283,016  

Distribution costs

   (479,829  (540,368  (1,020,197  0    (1,020,197

Administrative expenses(f)

   (405,716  (664,140  (1,069,856  26,162    (1,043,694

Other operating expenses

   (214,411  (104,371  (318,782  0    (318,782

Other gains/(losses)

   (33,039  29,374    (3,665  0    (3,665

Financial income(g)

   14,453    156,419    170,872    (10,313  160,559  

Financial costs (from non-financial activities)(g,h)

   (139,077  (295,244  (434,321  (18,286  (452,607

Earning on investments (equity method)

   458    0    458    0    458  

Exchange rate differences

   (256  (555,225  (555,481  0    (555,481

Result of indexation units

   129    0    129    0    129  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   382,358    (124,452  257,906    (71,003  186,903  

Income tax expense(i)

   (61,789  (42,396  (104,185  26,883    (77,302

Net income (loss) for the year

   320,569    (166,848  153,721    (44,120  109,601  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) for the period attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   320,197    (210,794  109,403    (59,603  49,800  

Income for the period attributable to non-controlling interests

   372    43,946    44,318    15,483    59,801  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the year

   320,569    (166,848  153,721    (44,120  109,601  

Earnings per share(j)

      

Average number of Shares

       474,543,664  

Basic earnings per share (US$)

       0.10494  

Diluted earnings per share (US$)

       0.10488  

   For the year ended December 31, 2012 
   (on a pro forma basis) 
   LATAM
(as reported)
  

TAM (a)
(January 1, 2012
to June 22, 2012)

  LATAM  

Pro Forma

Adjustments

  

Combined

Condensed

Pro Forma

 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Operating revenues

   9,722,189    3,283,547    13,005,736     13,005,736  

Cost of sales(b,c,d,e)

   (7,642,643  (2,852,217  (10,494,860  (69,981  (10,564,841
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross Margin

   2,079,546    431,330    2,510,876    (69,981  2,440,895  

Other operating income

   220,156    45,208    265,364     265,364  

Distribution costs

   (803,619  (256,056  (1,059,675   (1,059,675

Administrative expenses(f)

   (869,504  (328,626  (1,198,130  59,178    (1,138,952

Other operating expenses

   (311,753  (52,729  (364,482   (364,482

Other gains/(losses)

   (38,750  18,782    (19,968   (19,968

Financial income(g)

   77,489    26,451    103,940    13,233    117,173  

Financial costs (from non-financial activities)(g,h)

   (294,598  (147,597  (442,195  (2,006  (444,201

Earning on investments (equity method)

   972    0    972     972  

Exchange rate differences

   66,685    (356,745  (290,060   (290,060

Result of indexation units

   (22  0    (22   (22
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   126,602    148,777    (493,380  424    (492,956

Income tax expense(i)

   (102,212  169,016    66,804    7,194    73,998  

Net income (loss) for the year

   24,390    317,793    (426,576  7,618    (418,958
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) for the period attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   10,956    304,766    (453,037  7,618    (445,419

Income for the period attributable to non-controlling interests

   13,434    13,027    26,461     26,461  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the year

   24,390    317,793    (426,576  7,618    (418,958

Earnings per share(j)

      

Average number of shares

       476,293,870  

Basic earnings per share (US$)

       (0.93518

Diluted earnings per share (US$)

       (0.93518

The Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects the following adjustments:

a) Exchange rate and reclassifications: TAM’s functional and presentation currency under IFRS is the Brazilian real. Solely for the purpose of preparing these pro forma adjustments, TAM’s income statements have been translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for each quarter. Furthermore, in order to conform TAM’s financial figures to LATAM’s financial statement presentation, certain reclassifications were made to TAM’s income statement.

b) Property, plant and equipment (Fleet, including finance leases): The fair value of TAM’s aircraft recorded as property, plant and equipment was decreased to reflect the fair value on the date of the business combination. As a result of this adjustment and adjustments related to changes in the method of depreciation of aircraft components, major maintenance associated with those components, useful lives and residual values, the Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects an increase in cost of sales of US$113.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and an increase of US$59.7 million for period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012. The details of the differences in depreciation methods are as follows:

I.

TAM does not recognize and separately depreciate major maintenance components of aircraft and engines recorded as property, plant and equipment for which they hold power by the hour maintenance contracts; such maintenance costs are recorded as a liability in the balance sheet and expense in the statements of income as hours are flown and cycles incurred. See pro forma adjustment (e) where this provision in TAM’s statement of income is reversed. LATAM recognizes separately and depreciates all such maintenance components over their technical useful

lives as measured in flight hours or cycles. The effects on depreciation of applying LATAM’s policy to TAM’s aircraft and engines recorded as property, plant and equipment are included in the pro forma adjustment noted in (b) above.

II.The pro forma adjustments noted in (b) above include the effects of reassigning residual values to TAM’s aircraft and engines recorded as property, plant and equipment for the purposes of calculating depreciation. Such residual values have been determined based on the expected market value of each aircraft or engine at the end of its expected useful life.

III.For the purposes of calculating the above pro forma adjustments to depreciation, the fair value of TAM’s aircraft have been separated into components using the methodology and percentage benchmarks which LATAM has developed for the purposes of depreciating its fleet of aircraft and engines.

IV.The useful lives applied to depreciate the maintenance related components of TAM’s aircraft and engines recorded as property, plant and equipment for the purposes of the Pro Forma Statement of Income have been determined, where applicable, based on the standards used by LATAM for each specific model of aircraft and engine. The useful lives applied to non-maintenance related components have been maintained as those applied by LATAM and TAM in each of their financial statements, as these useful lives are dependent on the contractual conditions of ownership or leasing of each individual aircraft and engine.

c) Property, plant and equipment (Land and buildings): The carrying value of TAM’s land and buildings was decreased to reflect the fair value on the date of the transaction. As a result of this adjustment, the Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects a decrease in depreciation of US$2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and a decrease of US$1.0 million for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012.

d) Aircraft operating leases: The provision for major maintenance on TAM’s aircraft under operating leases with time & materials maintenance contracts was increased, in order to account for these maintenance costs in a manner consistent with that applied by LATAM in its consolidated financial statements. As a result of these adjustments, the Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects an increase in cost of sales of US$53.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and an increase of US$50.3 million for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012. TAM does not establish a provision for these costs but rather records them in its statement of income when such costs are incurred. LATAM records a provision for these costs based on flight hours and cycles incurred from the date on which the aircraft is first leased and utilizes this provision as and when related major maintenance activity occurs or reimbursements are required to be made to the lessor at the end of the lease term.

e) The provision for maintenance costs relating to TAM aircraft and engines recorded as property, plant and equipment was decreased to account for these costs in a manner consistent with that applied in the LATAM consolidated financial statements. As a result of these adjustments, the Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects a decrease in cost of sales of US$96.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and a decrease of US$39.0 million for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012. As discussed in the pro forma adjustments noted in in (b) above, LATAM’s accounting policy for aircraft and engines recorded in property plant and equipment provides for the major maintenance components of such aircraft to be designated as components within property plant and equipment and depreciated over their technical useful lives as measured in flight hours or cycles. TAM accounts for such costs for aircraft and engines under power by the hour contracts in its financial statements by creating a liability and recording the corresponding cost in its statement of income for each hour or cycle flown.

f) LAN and TAM incurred a total of US$ 26.2 million in one-time costs directly attributable to the business combination for the year ended December 31, 2011 and US$59.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. These costs relate primarily to fees paid to legal and other professional advisors. These non-recurring costs and the related tax effects have been eliminated in the Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income.

g) Hedge Accounting: The Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects a decrease in interest income of US$10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and an increase in interest income of US$13.7 million for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012, and an increase in interest expense of US$7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and a decrease in interest expense of US$7.6 million for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012, to account for TAM fuel hedging costs in a manner consistent with

that applied by LATAM in its consolidated financial statements. Fuel hedging contracts are not subject to hedge accounting at TAM, but LATAM accounts for these contracts under hedge accounting.

h) Financial liabilities: The difference between the fair value and the face amount of borrowings on the date of the business combination is amortized as an increase in financial costs over the remaining term of the borrowings based on their respective maturity dates. As a result of these adjustments, the Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects higher financial costs of US$10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and US$9.7 million for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012.

i) Income Taxes: The Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income reflects a decrease in income tax expense of US$26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and a decrease of US$7.2 million for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 22, 2012. These adjustments correspond to the deferred income tax effects of the purchase accounting and accounting policy adjustments to TAM’s results. The deferred income tax effects have been calculated by applying the Brazilian statutory income tax rate of 34%, and the effective tax rate of LAN to the expenses corresponding to the Company.

j) Earnings per share: Basic and diluted pro forma earnings per share have been calculated for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 based on the assumption that the shares issued in order to consummate the transaction had been issued at January 1, 2011.

   For the year ended December 31, 
   2012  2011 

Income attributable to owners of the parent

   

- Basic and diluted (ThUS$)

   (445,419  49,800  

Weighted average number of shares outstanding

   

   Basic

   

   LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

   476,293,870    474,543,664  

   Diluted

   

   LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

   476,293,870    474,815,044  

Earnings per share (US$)

   

- Basic

   (0.93518  0.10494  

- Diluted

   (0.93518  0.10488  

LAN’s Financial Results Discussion: Year ended December 31, 2011 compared to year ended December 31, 2010

The following table sets forth certain income statement data for LATAM Airlines Group for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, which represents the historical audited consolidated results of LAN. For certain operating data of LAN during these periods, see “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—LATAM’s Historical Financial Information.”

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2011  2010  2011/2010
%  change
 
   (in US$ millions, except per
share and capital stock  data)
  As a percentage of  total
operating revenues
  

Consolidated Results of Income by Function

      

Operating revenues

      

Passenger

   4,008.9    3,109.8    71.8    70.8    28.9  

Cargo

   1,576.5    1,280.7    28.2    29.2    23.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating revenues

   5,585.4    4,390.5    100.0    100.0    27.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cost of sales

   (4,078.6  (3,012.7  (73.0  (68.6  35.4  

Gross margin

   1,506.8    1,377.8    27.0    31.4    9.4  

Other operating income

   132.8    132.8    2.4    3.0    0.0  

Distribution costs

   (479.8  (383.5  (8.6  (8.7  25.1  

Administrative expenses

   (405.7  (331.8  (7.3  (7.6  22.3  

Other operating expenses

   (214.4  (172.4  (3.8  (3.9  24.4  

Financial income

   14.5    14.9    0.3    (0.3  (2.7

Financial costs (from non-financial activities)

   (139.1  (155.3  (2.5  (3.5  (10.4

Earning on investments (equity method)

   0.5    0.1    0.0    0.0    400.0  

Exchange rate differences

   (0.3  13.8    0.0    0.3    (102.2

Result of indexation units

   0.1    0.1    0.0    0.0    0.0  

Negative goodwill

   —      —      —      0.0    —    

Other net earnings (losses)

   (33.0  5.4    (0.6  1.0    (711.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   382.4    502.0    6.8    11.4    (23.8

Income tax expense

   (61.8  (81.1  (1.1  (1.8  (23.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income for the period

   320.6    420.9    5.7    9.6    (23.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income for the period attributable to the parent company’s equity holders

   320.2    419.7    5.7    9.6    (23.7

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2011   2010   2011/2010
%  change
 
   (in US$ millions, except per
share and capital stock  data)
   As a percentage of total
operating revenues
   

Income for the period attributable to non-controlling interests

   0.4     1.2     0.0     0.1     (66.7

Net income for the period

   320.6     420.9     5.7     9.6     (23.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per share

          

Basic earnings per share (US$)

   0.9434     1.2388        

Diluted earnings per share (US$)

   0.9426     1.2353        

Net Income

Net income for the period decreased 23.8% from US$420.9 million in 2010 to US$320.6 million in 2011. Net income attributable to the parent company’s equity holders decreased 23.7% from US$419.7 million in 2010 to

US$320.2 million in 2011, mainly due to the impact of the startup of LAN’s operations in Colombia and the volcanic ash cloud that disrupted air traffic throughout the region, which amounted to approximately US$51.7 million and US$36.6 million respectively, as well as 34.2% higher fuel prices, a portion of which was not recovered via the fuel surcharge mechanism.

The total operating revenue increase during 2011 continues to reflectreflected solid demand trends in both passenger and cargo operations. Passenger and cargo revenues accounted for 71.8% and 28.2% of total operating revenues, respectively. Passenger yields increased mainly as a result of an increase in fuel surcharges, in line with the increase of WTI prices and the crack spread.

Passenger traffic and capacity in 2011 included LAN Colombia’s domestic and international operations. Capacity increases focused mainly on domestic routes within Chile, regional routes within Latin America, and long-haul routes to the United States. This expansion was partially offset by decreased capacity on long haul routes to Europe as a result of itinerary changes implemented in 2011, mainly the cancellation of the route between Madrid and Paris in July 2011.

Operating costsexpenses increased mainly due to higher fuel costs of US$454.7 million, reflecting increased consumption of 12.2%, and a 28.8% increase after hedges in fuel prices,price (after hedges), higher wages and salaries driven by the appreciation of Latin America currencies, and higher headcount resulting from the consolidation of Aires.LAN Colombia.

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues in 2011 totaled US$5,585.4 million, a 27.2% increase as compared to total operating revenues of US$4,390.5 million in 2010. Our consolidated passenger revenues increased 28.9% to US$4,008.9 million in 2011 from US$3,109.8 million in 2010, due to a 11.2% increase in yields (from US¢9.4 to US¢10.4), and passenger load factors, which increased from 78.3% in 2010 to 79.8% in 2011 as the 15.9% increase in traffic outpaced the 13.7% capacity increase. Overall, revenues per ASK increased 13.4%. Traffic grew as a result of a 23.7% increase in domestic traffic (including domestic operations by LAN and its affiliates in Chile, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador), and a 12.6% increase in international traffic. International traffic accounted for approximately 68.1% of our total passenger traffic during 2011. At system level, yields increased 11.9% as a result of solid demand trends in both passenger and cargo operations that were also affected by fuel surcharges.

Domestic passenger revenues in Chile, Peru, Argentina, Ecuador and Colombia, which accounted for approximately 39% of our total passenger revenues in 2011 as compared to approximately 35% in 2010, increased 42.2% to US$1,540.8 million in 2011 from US$1,093.0 million in 2010. Domestic passenger traffic (as measured in RPKs) increased 23.7%, while domestic passenger capacity (as measured in ASKs) increased 23.5%, resulting in aan increase in load factor from 77.7% in 2010 to 77.8% in 2011. Domestic passenger yield increased 17.6% from US¢10.8 in 2010 to US¢12.7 in 2011, mainly due to strong increases in traffic and to a lesser extent fuel surcharges.

International passenger revenues, which accounted for approximately 61% of total passenger revenues in 2011 as compared to approximately 65% of passenger revenues in 2010, increased 21.7% to US$2,454.4 million in 2011 from US$2,016.9 million in 2010. International passenger traffic (as measured in RPKs) increased 12.6%, while passenger capacity (as measured in ASKs) increased 9.4% in 2011, resulting in an improvement in load factor from 78.5% in 2010 to 80.8% in 2011. Total international passenger yield (based on RPKs) increased 8.1% to US¢9.4 in 2011 from US¢8.7 in 2010, driven by the inclusion of fuel surcharges and solid demand.

Cargo revenues increased 23.1%, to US$1,576.5 million in 2011 from US$1,280.7 million in 2010, mainly driven by a 10.4% increase in yields (US¢43.6 in 2011 from US¢39.5 in 2010), and coupled with an 11.5% increase in traffic. In 2011, cargo traffic was driven by solid demand in the region reflected in growth in Latin American cargo markets, as well as improved revenue management practices and itinerary optimization. On the other handOur capacity also increased 12.4% during 2011. As a consequence, load factors decreased from 70.1% in 2010 to 69.6% in 2011, while revenues per ATK increased 9.5% as compared to 2010.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales in 2011 totaled US$4,078.6 million, representing a 35.4 %35.4% increase as compared to cost of sales of US$3,012.7 million in 2010. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of sales increased from 68.6% in 2010 to 73.0 % in 2011, mainly as a result of higher fuel prices compared to 2010 and higher costs related to the consolidation of LAN’s Colombian operations.

The increase in cost of sales was driven by higher aircraft fuel expenses, which totaled US$1,750.1 million in 2011, a 50.6% increase as compared to aircraft fuel expenses of US$1,161.9 million in 2010. Fuel expenses increased mainly due to a 37.2% increase in unhedged jet fuel prices (34.2% in the hedged price), coupled with a 12.2% increase in consumption. However, the Company recognized a US$39.9 million fuel hedge gain, compared to a US$1.0 million fuel hedge gain in 2010, resulting in a 28.8% increase in fuel prices after hedges.

Fuel costs comprise the single largest category of our operating expenses. Over the last few years, our fuel consumption and operating expenses have increased due to the significant growth in our operations and to the increase in fuel prices as a result of economic and political factors. In 2011, the foregoing trend was affected by geopolitical instability in the Middle East and the total fuel costs represented 33.8% of our total operating expenses. The into-wing (fuel price plus taxes and transportation costs) 2011 average final price was US$3.11 per gallon, representing a 34.2% increase from the 2010 average.

Depreciation and amortization increased 17.8% mainly due to the incorporation in 2011 under property, plant and equipmentsequipment of four new Airbus A319, 9 new Airbus A320s, and three Boeing 767-300s and the incorporation of additional aircraftsaircraft under operating leases.

Aircraft maintenance expenses increased by 51.2%, from US$120.7 million in 2010 to US$182.4 million in 2011 mainly due to the incorporation of the LAN Colombia´s fleet and the delivery of four Airbus A319 and 13 Airbus A320 passenger aircraft, three Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft and one Boeing 767-300F freighter. The unscheduled maintenance of aircraft and engines, as well as minor maintenance, are charged to results as incurred.

Aircraft Rentalsrentals increased 76.7% due to the incorporation of LAN Colombia’s fleet, consisting of nine Boeing 737-700s, 10 Dash 8-200s and four Dash 8-Q400s. Additionally, this increase considered the incorporation in 2011 ofLAN leased six leased Airbus A320s and one leased Boeing 767-300F freighter.freighter in 2011.

Passenger service expenses totaled US$136.0 million in 2011 compared to US$114.2 million in 2010. This represented a 19.1% increase that was driven by a 30.6% increase in the number of passengers transported during the year, as well as higher compensation paid to passengers for cancelled flights during this period.

As a result of the above, gross margin increased 9.4% from US$1,377.8 million in 2010 to US$1,506.8 million in 2011.

Other Consolidated Results

Other operating income remained stable at to US$132.8 million in 2010 and 2011, where growth in revenues from tours and travel services, duty free sales and maintenance services were offset by the exclusion of revenues from Blue Express, LAN’s logistic and courier subsidiary that was sold in early April 2011.

Interest income decreased by 2.7% to US$14.5 million in 2011 from US$14.9 million in 2010, due to a lower average cash balance during the period.

Distribution costs increased 25.1% from US$383.5 million in 2010 to US$479.8 million in 2011. This increase was caused by higher overall commissions to agents (related to both passenger and cargo sales), which increased 20.7% to US$209.3 million in 2011 from US$173.4 million in 2010, and by a. 27.2% increase in traffic revenues (passenger and cargo), partially offset by a 0.2 point reduction in average commissions. This reduction was mainly related to lower commissions in the cargo business.

Administrative expenses increased 22.3% from US$331.8 million in 2010 to US$405.7 million in 2011 due to the higher wages of administrative personnel and higher asset (non aircraft) depreciation, as a result of additions in 2010 and 2011.

Other operating expenses increased 24.4% from US$172.4 million in 2010 to US$214.4 million in 2011, as a result of higher sales costs, advertising and marketing expenses and costs related to tours and travel services.

Financial costs (from non-financial activities) decreased by 10.4% to US$139.1 million in 2011 from US$155.3 million in 2010 due to the fact that higher average long-term debt related to fleet financing was offset by the recognition of interest related to the financing of pre-delivery payments (PDPs), in line with the accounting policy regarding these payments (IFRS).

Exchange rate differences decreased from a gain of US$13.8 million in 2010 to an expense of US$0.3 million in 2011. The 2010 amount was a result of a recognized US$5.4 million gain that mainly stemmed from foreign exchange variations during the period; part of the exchange gain was a result of remittances from LAN’s operations in Venezuela. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Risk of Variation in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates”,Rates,” for a discussion of LAN’s hedging program for currency fluctuations. On December 31, 2011, the Company held US$25.9 million in assets located in Venezuela, of which over 92.0% constituted cash equivalents. On a consolidated basis, the Company’s assets related to its operations in Venezuela represented 0.4% of the total assets of the Company. For the year 2011, operating revenues of the Venezuelan regional office represented 1.2% of the Company’s consolidated revenues. In Venezuela, effective 2003, the authorities decreed that all remittances abroad should be approved by the Currency Management Commission (CADIVI). Despite having free availability of bolivares in Venezuela, the Company has certain restrictions for freely remitting these funds outside Venezuela. Since January 2010, exchange rate for Venezuelan Bolivars (VEF) is fixed to 4.3 VEF/US$ .The. The Company’s operations in Venezuela are carried out through an agency that, from an accounting perspective, is considered an extension of the Company. Therefore, the functional currency is the US dollar and hyperinflationary accounting is not required.

As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded a US$14.1 million gain (pre-tax) due to the reversal of a portion of the provision related to the investigation in the cargo business carried out by the European Commission. This was as a result of the fine announced in November 2010, which was lower than the amount provided for. This reversal is recorded in Other gains/(losses). (SeeSee “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Cargo Operations—Cargo-Related Investigations”).Investigations.”

Under other net earningsgains (losses), the Company recorded a US$33.0 million loss, reflecting the US$66 million charge related to the civil class action in the cargo business, partially offset by the US$45 million gain from the sale of Blue Express. This loss also included a one-time charge of UF 116,091 (US$5.0 million) resulting from a settlement agreement with Chilean airline PAL regarding the pending legal proceeding before the TDLC and their appeal before the Chilean Supreme Court in connection with the merger process between LAN and TAM.

Income tax expenses decreased by 23.8%, amounting to US$61.8 million in 2011 as compared to US$81.1 million in 2010. This decrease was primarily the result of a 23.8% decrease in pre-tax income, For more information, see “—Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Taxes” below and Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Year ended December 31, 2010 compared to year ended December 31, 2009

Net Income

Net income for the period increased 80.6% from US$233.0 million in 2009 to US$420.9 million in 2010. Net income attributable to the parent company’s equity holders increased 81.6% from US$231.1 million in 2009 to US$419.7 million in 2010.

The revenue increase during 2010 was driven by the recovery of the world economy and the strong capacity expansion in both the passenger and cargo businesses. In addition, the traffic increased strongly, driving yields and load factors higher.

Operating costs increased mainly due to higher fuel prices, higher wages and salaries driven by the appreciation of Latin America currencies, as well as higher costs related to ACMI leases in the cargo business.

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues in 2010 totaled US$4,390.5 million, a 24.8% increase as compared to total operating revenues of US$3,519.2 million in 2009. Our consolidated passenger revenues increased 18,5% to US$3,109.8

million in 2010 from US$2,623.6 million in 2009, due to a 6.8% increase in yields (from US¢8.8 to US¢9.4), and passenger load factors, which increased from 76.9% in 2009 to 78.3% in 2010 as the 11.2% increase in traffic outpaced the 9.2% capacity increase. Overall, revenues per ASK increased 8.5%. Traffic grew as a result of a 10.6% increase in domestic traffic (including domestic operations by LAN and its affiliates in Chile, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador), and an 11.3% increase in international traffic. International traffic accounted for approximately 70% of our total passenger traffic during 2010. Yields increased 6.8% as a result of a stronger demand environment driven by world economy recovery during the year.

Domestic passenger revenues in Chile, Peru, Argentina and Ecuador, which accounted for approximately 35% of our total passenger revenues in 2010 as compared to approximately 36% in 2009, increased 14.7% to US$1,072.4 million in 2010 from US$934.9 million in 2009. Domestic passenger traffic (as measured in RPKs) increased 10.5%, while domestic passenger capacity (as measured in ASKs) increased 6.6%, resulting in a increase in load factor from 74.9% in 2009 to 77.7% in 2010. Domestic passenger yield increased 3.7% from US¢10.4 in 2009 to US¢10.8 in 2010, mainly due to strong increases in traffic.

International passenger revenues, which accounted for approximately 65% of total passenger revenues in 2010 as compared to approximately 64% of passenger revenues in 2009, increased 20.7% to US$2,018.2 million in 2010 from US$1,672.0 million in 2009. International passenger traffic (as measured in RPKs) increased 11.3%, while passenger capacity (as measured in ASKs) increased 10.4% in 2010, resulting in an improvement in load factor from 77.8% in 2009 to 78.5% in 2010. Total international passenger yield (based on RPKs) increased 8.7% to US¢8.7 in 2010 from US¢8.0 in 2009, driven by strong world economy recovery.

Cargo revenues increased 43.0%, to US$1,280.7 million in 2010 from US$895.6 million in 2009, mainly driven by a 24.8% increase in yields (US¢41.6 in 2010 from US¢35.7 in 2009), and coupled with a 23.5% increase in traffic. In 2010, cargo traffic was driven by a strong recovery and growth in the global cargo markets, as well as better revenue management practices capacity increased 20.5% during 2010. As a consequence, load factors increased from 68.4% in 2009 to 70.1% in 2010. Revenues per ATK also increased 18.7% as compared to 2009.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales in 2010 totaled US$3,012.7 million, representing a 19.4% increase as compared to cost of sales of US$2,522.8 million in 2009. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of sales decreased from 71.7% in 2009 to 68.6% in 2010, as a result of higher traffic and yields compared to 2009.

The increase in cost of sales was driven by higher aircraft fuel expenses, which totaled US$1,161.9 million in 2010, a 21.1% increase as compared to aircraft fuel expenses of US$959.6 million in 2009. Fuel expenses increased 21.1% mainly due to a 26.4% increase in unhedged jet fuel prices (9.4% in the hedged price), coupled with a 10.7% increase in consumption. However, the Company recognized a US$1.0 million fuel hedge gain, compared to a US$128.7 million fuel hedge loss in 2009.

In addition, the Company recorded higher ACMI leases in the cargo business due to the expansion in the cargo business. Depreciation expenses increased mainly due to the incorporation of one new Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft in February 2010 and eight new Airbus A320 aircraft between July and December 2010. For further information on depreciation policies, please refer to “Critical Accounting Policies” below, and Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Aircraft maintenance expenses decreased by 0.3%, from US$121.0 million in 2009 to US$120.6 million in 2010, due to lower maintenance payments to third parties, which offset the effects of a larger fleet. Aircraft rental expenses increased mainly due to an increase in the average rental cost due to the delivery of two leased Boeing 777 freighters in April and May 2009, two leased Airbus A320s in September 2010 and two leased Boeing 767-300 freighters in November and December 2010. Wages and benefits expenses increased mainly because of a higher average headcount, which is in-line with the Company’s operational expansion, an appreciation of Latin American currencies, and an increase in variable bonus payments, which were in line with higher profits obtained in 2010.

Passenger service expenses totaled US$114.2 million in 2010 compared to US$92.8 million in 2009. This represented a 23.1% increase that was driven by a 12.3% increase in the number of passengers transported during the year, as well as higher compensation paid to passengers during this period.

As a result of the above, gross margin increased 38.3% from US$996.4 million in 2009 to US$1,377.8 million in 2010.

Other operating income decreased by 2.6% to US$132.8 million in 2010 from US$136.4 million in 2009, mainly because of a decrease in tour and travel services and lower revenues from aircraft leases, which were partially offset by higher revenues from storage and custom services to third parties. Interest income decreased by 18.1% to US$14.9 million in 2010 from US$18.2 million in 2009, mainly due to lower average interest rates.

Distribution costs increased 17.3% from US$327.0 million in 2009 to US$383.5 million in 2010. This increase was caused by higher overall commissions to agents (related to both passenger and cargo sales), which increased by 20.5% to US$173.4 million in 2010 from US$143.9 million in 2009, and by a 24.8% increase in traffic revenues (for both passenger and cargo revenues); this increase was partially offset by a 0.1 point reduction in the average commission paid. This reduction was mainly related to a decrease in the commission rate paid to agents in the passenger business.

Administrative expenses increased 23.1% from US$269.6 million in 2009 to US$331.8 million in 2010 due to the higher wages of administrative personnel and higher asset (non aircraft) depreciation, as a result of additions in 2009 and 2010.

Other operating expenses increased 71.5% from US$100.5 million in 2009 to US$172.4 million in 2010, as a result of higher sales costs, advertising and marketing expenses and costs related to tours and travel services.

Financial costs (from non-financial activities) increased by 1.4% to US$155.3 million in 2010 from US$153.1 million in 2009 due to higher debt related to fleet financing, but was partially offset by lower average interest rates.

Exchange rate differences increased from an expense of US$11.2 million in 2009 to a gain of US$13.8 million in 2010 as a result of a recognized US$5.4 million gain that mainly stemmed from foreign exchange variations during the period; part of the exchange gain was a result of remittances from LAN’s operations in Venezuela. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Risk of Variation in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates”, for a discussion of LAN’s hedging program for currency fluctuations. During 2009 the devaluation of the Venezuelan currency impacted the Company’s operations in that country and the Company recognized a US$28.0 million charge related to it.

On December 31, 2010, the Company held US$36.0 million in assets located in Venezuela, of which over 74.0% constituted cash equivalents. On a consolidated basis, the Company’s assets related to its operations in Venezuela represented less than 0.5% of the total assets of the Company. For the year 2010, operating revenues of the Venezuelan regional office represented 1.7% of the Company’s consolidated revenues. The Company’s operations in Venezuela are carried out through an agency that, from an accounting perspective, is considered an extension of the Company. Therefore, the functional currency is the US dollar and hyperinflationary accounting is not required.

As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded a US$14.1 million gain (pre-tax) due to the reversal of a portion of the provision related to the investigation in the cargo business carried out by the European Commission. This was as a result of the fine announced in November 2010, which was lower than the amount provided for. This reversal is recorded in Other gains/(losses). (See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business of the Company—Cargo Operations—Cargo-Related Investigations”).

Income tax expenses increased by 82.2%, amounting to US$81.1 million in 2010 as compared to US$44.5 million in 2009. This increase was primarily the result of an 80.9% increase in pre-tax income, coupled with a 0.1% increase in the average tax rate (currently 16.2%) in 2010. For more information, see “—Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Taxes” below and Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

U.S. Dollar Presentation and Price-Level Adjustments

General

Foreign currency transactions

 

 (a)Presentation and functional currencies

The items included in the financial statements of each of Lan Airlines and its consolidated subsidiariesLATAM are valued using the currency of the main economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”). The functional currency of Lan AirlinesLATAM is the U.S. dollar, which is also the currency of presentation of the audited consolidated financial statements of Lan AirlinesLATAM and its subsidiaries.

 

 (b)Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated to the functional currency using the exchange rates on the transaction dates. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from the liquidation of these transactions and from the translation, at the closing exchange rates, of the monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency, are shown in the consolidated statement of income.

 

 (c)Group entities

The results and financial position of all the LANLATAM entities (none of which utilizes the currency of a hyper-inflationary economy) that have a functional currency other than the currency of presentation are translated to the currency of presentation as follows:

 

 (i)Assets and liabilities of each consolidated statement of financial position are translated at the closing exchange rate on the date of the consolidated statement of financial position;

 

 (ii)The revenues and expenses of each results account are translated at monthly average rates; and

 

 (iii)All the resultant exchange differences are shown as a separate component in net equity.

For consolidation purposes, exchange differences arising from the translation of a net investment in foreign entities (or in local entities with a functional currency different to that of the parent), and of loans and other foreign currency instruments designated as hedges for such investments, are recorded within net equity. When the investment is sold, these exchange differences are shown in the consolidated statement of income as part of the loss or gain on the sale.

Adjustments to the goodwill and fair value arising from the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and are translated at the period-end exchange rate.

Effects of Exchange Rate Fluctuations

Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar in terms of the pricing of our products, composition of our balance sheet and effects on our results of operations. Most of our revenues (78%(54% in 2011)2012) are in U.S. dollars or in prices pegged to the U.S. dollar and a substantial portion of our expenses (53%(41% in 2011)2012) is denominated in dollars or pegged to the U.S. dollar, particularly fuel costs, landing and over flight fees, aircraft rentals, insurance and aircraft components and supplies. Almost all of our liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars (93%(91% as of December 31, 2011)2012), including bank loans, certain air traffic liabilities, and certain amounts payable to our suppliers. As of December 31, 2011, 91%2012, 32% of our assets were denominated in U.S. dollars, principally aircraft, cash and cash

equivalents, accounts receivable and other fixed assets. SubstantiallyThe decrease in the percentage of U.S. dollar assets is due to the effects of business combination with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries, as its functional currency is the Brazilian real.Substantially all of our commitments, including operating leases and purchase commitments for aircraft, are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Although we generally maintain our international passenger fares and cargo prices in U.S. dollars or at prices pegged to the U.S. dollar, we are exposed to foreign exchange losses and gains due to exchange rate fluctuations. We recorded a net foreign exchange profit of US$13.8 million in 2010 and a net foreign exchange loss of US$0.3 million in 2011 and a net foreign exchange profit of US$66.7 million in 2012, which are set forth in our consolidated statement of income under “Exchange rates differences.” For more information, see Notes 2.3(a) and 3133 to our audited consolidated financial statements. The profit incurred in 2010 was mainly related to the appreciation of the Latin American currencies against the U.S. dollar.

IFRS/Non-IFRS Reconciliation

We use “Cost per ATK”ASK-equivalent” and “Cost per ATKASK-equivalent excluding fuel price variations” in analyzing operating costsexpenses on a per unit basis. “ATKs”“ASKs” (available tonseat kilometers) measuremeasures the number of tonsseats of capacity available for the transportation of revenue load (passengers and/or cargo)passengers multiplied by the kilometers flown. “ASK-equivalent” includes capacity for both passenger and cargo equivalent tons multiplied by the kilometers flown. The figure is obtained by adding passenger ASKs and the quotient of cargo ATKs (available ton kilometers) divided by 0.095. To obtain our unit costs, which are used by our management in the analysis of our results, we divide our “total costs” by our total ATKs.ASK-equivalents. “Total costs” are calculated by starting with operating costsexpenses as defined under IFRS and making certain adjustments for interest costs and other revenues. The cost component is further adjusted to obtain “costs per ATKsASK-equivalents excluding fuel price variations,” in order to remove the impact of changes in fuel prices for the year. “Cost per ATK”ASK-equivalent” and “Cost per ATKASK-equivalent excluding fuel price variations” do not have a standardized meaning, and as such may not be comparable to similarly titled measures provided by other companies. These metrics should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating costsexpenses or as indicators of performance or cash flows or as a measure of liquidity.

The table below reconciles our operating costs asexpenses (as defined by IFRSIFRS) for 2012, 2011 and 2010 to costs used in the calculation of “Cost per ATK”ASK-equivalent” and “Cost per ATKASK-equivalent excluding fuel price variations.”variations” for such periods. Figures for 2012 (pro forma) and 2011 (pro forma) have been presented on a pro forma basis to include the operating data of TAM for each period. Figures for LATAM 2012 (actual) correspond to LATAM’s consolidated audited financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2012, including TAM’s consolidated costs from June 23, 2012 and TAM’s third and fourth quarter operating statistics. Figures for LAN 2011 and 2010 (actual) represent LAN’s historical operating expenses and statistics and do not include any costs or statistics from TAM.

 

   2011   2010   2009 

Cost per ATK

      

Operating cost (US$ thousands)

   5,178,554     3,900,474     3,219,813  

+ Interest expense (US$ thousands)

   139,077     155,279     153,109  

– Interest income (US$ thousands)

   14,453     14,946     18,183  

– Other operating income (US$ thousands)

   132,804     132,826     136,351  

ATK operating costs

   5,170,374     3,907,981     3,218,388  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Divided by system’s ATKs (thousands)

   10,056,142     8,968,792     7,811,750  

= Cost per ATK (US$ cents)

   51.42     43.57     41.20  

Cost per ATK excluding fuel price variations

      

ATK operating costs (thousands)

   5,170,374     3,907,981     3,218,388  

– Actual fuel expenses (US$ thousands)

   1,750,052     1,161,927     959,608  

+ (Gallons consumed) times (previous year’s fuel price)

   1,303,946     1,062,179     1,410,767  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

ATK operating costs excluding fuel price variations

   4,724,268     3,808,233     3,669,547  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Divided by system’s ATKs (thousands)

   10,056,142     8,968,792     7,811,750  

= Cost per ATK excluding fuel price variations (US$ cents)

   46.98     42.46     46.97  
   

2012

LATAM

(pro forma)

   

2011

LATAM

(pro forma)

   

2012

LATAM

(actual)

   

2011

LAN
(actual)

   

2010

LAN

(actual)

 

Cost per ASK-equivalent

          

Operating expenses (US$ thousands)

   13,182,167     12,300,353     9,625,466     5,178,519     3,900,439  

+ Interest expense (US$ thousands)

   444,201     452,607     294,598     139,077     155,279  

– Interest income (US$ thousands)

   117,173     160,559     77,489     14,453     14,946  

– Other operating income (US$ thousands)

   265,364     283,016     220,156     132,804     132,826  

ASK-equivalent operating expenses

   13,243,831     12,309,385     9,622,419     5,170,339     3,907,946  

Divided by system’s ASK-equivalents (thousands)

   212,939,371     207,444,236     161,209.26     102,798.87     91,078.36  

= Cost per ASK equivalent (US$ cents)

   6.22     5.93     5.97     5.03     4.29  

Cost per ASK-equivalent excluding fuel price variations

          

ASK-equivalent operating expenses (thousands)

   13,243,831     12,309,385     9,622,419     5,170,339     3,907,946  

– Actual fuel expenses (US$ thousands)

   4,780,289     4,244,817     3,343,569     1,750,052     1,161,927  

+ (Gallons consumed) times (previous year’s fuel price)

   4,359,448     4,191,045     2,952,257     1,303,621     1,062,204  

ASK-equivalent operating expenses excluding fuel price variations

   12,822,990     12,255,613     9,140,107     4,723,908     3,808,223  

Divided by system’s ASK-equivalents (thousands)

   212,939,371     207,444,236     161,209.26     102,798.87     91,078.36  

= Cost per ASK-equivalent excluding fuel price variations (US$ cents)

   6.02     5.9     5.67     4.6     4.18  

In addition, weLATAM continues to use revenues per ASK or ATK, as applicable, in analyzing revenues on a per unit basis.basis, which is consistent with how LAN analyzed its revenues before the merger. To obtain our unit revenues, which are used by our management in the analysis of our results, we divide our passenger revenues by our total ASKs and our cargo revenues by our total ATKs. We use our revenues as defined under IFRS for purposes of the calculation of this metric. Revenues per ASK or ATK, as the case may be, do not have a standardized meaning, and as such may not be comparable to similarly titled measures provided by other companies. It is not an IFRS based measure of performance or liquidity. This metric should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for revenues or as indicators of performance or cash flows as a measure of liquidity.

The table below shows the calculation of our revenues per ASK or ATK, as applicable, in each of the periods indicated:indicated. Figures for 2012 (pro forma) and 2011 (pro forma) have been presented on a pro forma basis to include the revenues of TAM for each period. Figures for LATAM 2012 (actual) correspond to LATAM’s consolidated audited financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2012, including TAM’s consolidated revenues from June 23, 2012. Figures for LAN 2011 and 2010 (actual) represent LAN’s historical revenues and do not include any revenues from TAM.

 

   2011   2010   2009 

Passenger Revenues (US$ million)

   4,008.91     3,109.80     2,623.61  

ASK (million)

   48,153.58     42,355.20     38,776.20  

Passenger Revenues/ASK (US$ cents)

   8.3     7.3     6.8  

Cargo Revenues (US$ million)

   1,576.53     1,280.71     895.55  

ATK (million)

   5,192.74     4,628.73     3,848.89  

Cargo Revenues/ATK (US$ cents)

   30.4     27.7     23.3  

   2012
LATAM
(pro forma)
   2011
LATAM
(pro forma)
   2012
LATAM
(actual)
   2011
LAN
(actual)
   2010
LAN
(actual)
 

Passenger Revenues (US$ million)

   11,065.98     10,960.67     7,978.66     4,008.91     3,109.80  

ASK (million)

   132,448,74     126,565.45     93,318.15     48,153.58     42,355.20  

Passenger Revenues/ASK (US$ cents)

   8.35     8.66     8.5     8.3     7.3  

Cargo Revenues (US$ million)

   1,939.75     2,067.62     1,743.53     1,576.53     1,280.71  

ATK (million)

   7,645.95     7,683.48     5,198.34     5,192.74     4,628.73  

Cargo Revenues/ATK (US$ cents)

   25.37     26.91     33.5     30.4     27.7  

Seasonality

Our operating revenues are substantially dependent on overall passenger and cargo traffic volume, which is subject to seasonal and other changes in traffic patterns. Our passenger revenues are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters of each year, during the southern hemisphere’s (Chile and Argentina) spring and summer, thansummer. In the Brazilian passenger air transportation market, there is always a higher demand for air transportation services in the second and third quarters. Since Peru, Ecuador and Colombia havehalf of the year, leaving the second quarter as the weakest one for the company. However, the seasonality is partially mitigated by the fact of LATAM having higher concentration of business travel than market average (which is less sensitive to seasonality). Additionally, the expansion of the company in other countries with different seasonal patterns the expansion into those markets(Perú, Ecuador, Colombia) has led to stronger passenger revenues in the second and third quarters, therefore moderatingalso moderated the overall seasonality of ourthe passenger business. Our cargo revenues generally are higher in the fourth quarter, which correspond to the harvest season in the southern hemisphere.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires our management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and judgments to develop amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. We strive to maintain a process to review the application of our accounting

policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the estimates that are required to prepare our consolidated financial statements. We believe that the consistent application of these policies enables us and our subsidiaries to provide readers of the financial statements with more useful and reliable information about our operating results and financial condition.

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different outcomes under different assumptions and conditions. For a discussion on these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. The following are the accounting policies that we believe are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Accounting estimates and judgments

The Company has used estimates to value and book some of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and commitments; these basically refer to:

 

The evaluation of possible impairment loss for certain assets.

 

The useful life and residual value of fixed assets and intangible assets.

 

The criteria employed in the valuation of certain assets.

 

Air tickets sold that are not actually used.

 

The calculation of deferred income at the period-end corresponding to the valuation of kilometers or points credited to holders of the LANPASS loyalty cardprograms which have not yet been used.

 

The need for provisioning and where required the determination of their values.

 

The recoverability of deferred tax assets.

��

These estimates are made on the basis of the best information available on the matters analyzed. In any case, it is possible that events will require them to be modified in the future, in which case the effects would be accounted for prospectively. Additionally, the management has applied judgment in determining that LATAM Airlines Group S.A. has control over TAM for accounting purposes and therefore has consolidated their financial statements. The above is based on LATAM having issued their ordinary shares in exchange for all of the outstanding common and preferred shares of TAM (except those shareholders of TAM who did not accept exchange and which were subject of the squeeze-out described in Note 18.2), entitling LATAM to substantially all of the economic benefits that will be generated by the LATAM Airlines Group and also, consequently, exposing LATAM to substantially all the risks incidental to the operations of TAM. This exchange aligns the economic interests of LATAM and all of its shareholders, including the TAM controlling shareholders, ensuring that the shareholders and directors of TAM will have no incentive to exercise their rights in a manner that is beneficial to TAM but detrimental to LATAM. Further, all significant actions required for the operation of the airlines require the affirmative vote of both LATAM and the TAM controlling shareholders. In addition, LATAM is in the process of integrating the operations of LAN and with TAM, and both entities will be operated as a single company. Within this structure, most critical airline activities will be managed in Brazil by the TAM CEO and globally by the LATAM CEO, who will be in charge of the overall operation of the LATAM Group and who will report to the LATAM board. Further, the LATAM CEO will evaluate the performance of the LATAM Group executives and, together with the LATAM board, determine compensation. Although there are restrictions on voting interests that currently may be held by foreign investors under Brazilian law, LATAM believes that the economic substance of these arrangements satisfy the requirements established by the applicable accounting standards and that consolidation by LATAM of TAM’s operations is appropriate.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues include the fair value of the proceeds received or to be received on sales of goods and rendering services in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Revenues are shown net of refunds, rebates and discounts.

(a) Rendering of services

 

 a.1Passenger and cargo transport

We recognize passenger and cargo revenues either when the transportation service is provided or when we determine that the tickets will not be used or refunded, which, in the case of passenger revenues, reduces the air traffic liability. We estimate revenue breakage based on historical breakage experience that takes into account the aging of tickets that will not be used or refunded. Commissions payable related to such unearned earnings are shown net of the air traffic liability. Other revenues, including aircraft leases, courier, logistic and ground services, duty free sales, and storage and customs brokering, are recognized when services are provided.

The amount of passenger ticket sales not yet recognized as revenue is reflected as an air traffic liability. Air traffic liability includes estimates of the amount of future refunds and exchanges, net of forfeitures for all unused tickets once the flight date has passed. We perform periodic evaluations of this estimated liability based on actual results. Any adjustments, which can be significant, are included in the results of operations for the periods in which the evaluations are completed. These adjustments relate primarily to the differences between our estimation of certain revenue transactions and the related sales price, as well as refunds, exchanges and other items for which final settlement occurs in periods subsequent to the sale of the related tickets at amounts other than the original sales price.

Actual events and circumstances may differ from historical fare sale activity and customer travel patterns and can result in refunds, exchanges or forfeited tickets differing significantly from estimates. We evaluate our estimates periodically. If actual refunds, exchanges or forfeitures fall outside of our estimated ranges, we review our estimates and assumptions and adjust air traffic liability and passenger revenues as necessary. As with any estimates, actual results may vary from estimated amounts.

 

 a.2Frequent flyer program

The Company has a frequent flyer program for LATAM passengers called LANPASS whoseand a frequent flyer program for TAM passengers called TAM Fidelidade. Customers can also earn points through Multiplus, a subsidiary of TAM, which permits the accrual of points for many products and services (not just airline flights) and had more than 200 partner establishments, including the TAM Fidelidade program, as of December 31, 2012.

Both frequent flyer programs’ objective is customer loyalty through the delivery of LANPASS kilometers or Multiplus points every time that members of the program fly with the Company or its alliance partners, use the services of entities registered with the program or make purchases with an associated credit card. The kilometerskilometers/points earned can be exchanged for flights tickets or other services of associated entities.

The consolidated financial statements include LANPASS liabilities for this concept (deferred income), according to the estimate of the valuation established for the kilometers accumulated pending use at that date, in accordance with IFRIC 13: “Customer loyalty programs”.programs.” Points earned from TAM Fidelidade members are bought from Multiplus and seats redeemed are sold to Multiplus. Multiplus manages the points liabilities. Revenue from both programs are recognized once the purchased tickets are flown.

LANPASS Kilometers expire if they are not utilized over a period of three years. This period is renewable if the passenger takes a flight or meets specific requirements regarding the accumulation of kilometers through one of the partners of the program. Multiplus Points expire if they are not utilized over a period of two years, this period is not renewable.

Property, Plant and Equipment

TheLATAM’s land of Lan Airlines and Subsidiaries is recognized at cost less any accumulated impairment loss.

The rest of the property, plant and equipment are shown, initially and subsequently, at their historic cost less the corresponding depreciation and any impairment loss, except for certain land and minor equipment that are reassessed at first adoption, according to IFRS.

Thethe amount of advance payments to aircraft manufacturers are capitalized by the Company under “Construction in progress” until receipt of aircraft.

Subsequent costs (replacement of components, improvements and extensions) are included in the value of the initial asset or shown as a separate asset only when it is probable that the future economic benefits associated with the elements of property, plant and equipment are going to flow to the Company and the cost of such element can be determined reliably. The value of the component replaced is written-off in the books. The rest of the repairs and maintenance are charged to the result of the year in which they are incurred.

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives; except in the case of certain technical components, which are depreciated on the basis of cycles and hours flown.

The residual value and useful life of assets is revised, and adjusted if necessary, once a year.

When the carrying amount of an asset is higher than its estimated recoverable amount, its value is reduced immediately to its recoverable amount. For more information, see Note 2.8 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Losses and gains on the sale of property, plant and equipment are calculated by comparing the proceeds obtained with the book value and are included in the consolidated statement of income.

Maintenance

The costs incurred for scheduled major maintenance of aircraft’saircraft´s fuselage and engines are capitalized and depreciated until the next maintenance. The depreciation rate is determined on technical grounds, according to its use expressed based on cycles and flight hours. Unscheduled maintenances of aircraft and engines are charged to income as incurred.

Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivatives are booked initially at fair value on the date the derivative contracts are signed and later they continue to be valued at their fair value. The method for booking the resultant loss or gain depends on whether the derivative has been designated as a hedging instrument and, if so, the nature of the item hedged.

The Company designates certain derivatives as:

 

 (a)Hedge of the fair value of recognized assets (“fair value hedge”);

 

 (b)Hedge of a identified risk associated with a recognized liability or an expected highly probable transaction (“cash-flow hedge”); or

 

 (c)Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting.

The Company documents, at the inception of each transaction, the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as its objectives for managing risk and the strategy for carrying out various hedging transactions. The Company also documents its assessment, both at the beginning and on an ongoing basis, as to whether the derivatives used in the hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the items being hedged.

The total fair value of the hedging derivatives is booked as an other non-current financial asset or liability if the remaining maturity of the hedging instrument is over 12 months, and as an other current financial asset or liability if the remaining term of the hedging instrument is less than 12 months. Derivatives not booked as hedges are classified as other financial assets or liabilities, current in the case that their remaining maturity is less than 12 months and non-current in the case that it is more than 12 months.

(a) Fair value hedges

Changes in the fair value of designated derivatives that qualify as fair value hedges are shown in the consolidated statement of income, together with any change in the fair value of the asset or liability hedged that is attributable to the risk being hedged.

(b) Cash flow hedges

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of designated derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges is shown in net equity. The loss or gain relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of income under “Other gains (losses).” Amounts deferred in equity are reclassified to profit and loss when the related hedged item impacts profit and loss.

In the case of variable interest-rate hedges, this means that the amounts recognized in equity are reclassified to results within financial cost at the same time the associated debts accrue interest.

For fuel price hedges, the amounts shown in equity are reclassified to results as Cost of sales to the extent that the fuel subject to the hedge is used.

When hedging instruments mature or are sold or when they do not meet the requirements to be accounted for as hedges, any gain or loss accumulated in net equity until that moment remains in equity and is reclassified to the consolidated statement of income when the hedged transaction is finally recognized. When it is expected that the hedged transaction is no longer going to occur, the gain or loss accumulated in net equity is taken immediately to the consolidated statement of income as “Other gains (losses).”

(c) Derivatives not booked as a hedge

Certain derivatives are not booked as a hedge. The changes in fair value of any derivative instrument that is not booked as a hedge are shown immediately in the consolidated statement of income, in “Other gains (losses).”

Deferred taxes

Deferred taxes are calculated, according to the balance-sheet method, on the temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their book values. However, if the temporary differences arise from the initial recognition of a liability or an asset in a transaction different from a business combination that at the time of the transaction does not affect the accounting result or the tax gain or loss, they are not booked. The deferred tax is determined using the tax rates (and laws), that have been enacted or substantially enacted at the end of the reporting period, and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realized or the deferred tax liability is discharged.

Deferred tax assets are recognized when it is probable that there will be sufficient future tax earnings with which to compensate the temporary differences.

Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except for deferred income tax liability where timing of the reversal of the temporary differences is controlled by the group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

IFRS 7 Financial instruments: Disclosures (Amendment)

 

IAS 12 Income taxes (Amendment)

 

IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements (Amendment)

 

IAS 28 Investments in associates and joint ventures

IAS 27 Separate financial statements

IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements

 

IFRS 11 Joint arrangements

 

IFRS 12 Disclosures of interests in other entities

 

IFRS 13 Fair value measurement

 

IAS 19 Employee benefits (Amendment)

 

IAS 32 Financial instruments: Presentation (Amendment)

IFRS 9 Financial instruments

 

IFRIC 20 Stripping costsImprovements issued in the production phase of mine2012

(i)IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements (May 2012)

(ii)IAS 16 Property plant and equipment (May 2012)

(iii)IAS 32 Financial instrument: Presentation (May 2012)

(iv)IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting (May 2012)

(v)Amendments to IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statement, IFRS 11 Joint arrangements and IFRS 12 Disclosure of interests in other entities (June 2012)

(vi)IAS 27 Separate financial statements, IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements and IFRS 12 Disclosure of interest in other entities (October 2012)

The Company’s management believes that the adoption of the standards, amendments and interpretations described above would not have had a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the year of their first application. The Company has not early adopted any of the above standards.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

OurLATAM cash and cash equivalents totaled US$650.3 million as of December 31, 2012, US$374.4 million as of December 31, 2011 and US$631.1 million as of December 31, 2010 and2010. Additionally, the company had short term marketable securities totaling US$731.5470.1 million as of December 31, 2009.2012, US$98.1 million as of December 31, 2011 and US$106.0 million as of December 31, 2010. In the aggregate, LATAM’s cash and marketable securities totaled US$1,120.3 million as of December 31, 2012, US$472.5 million as of December 31, 2011 and US$737.1

million as of December 31, 2010. The decreaseUS$647.8 million increase in our cash and cash equivalentsmarketable securities from 20102011 to 20112012 was mainly due to higher investment activities related tothe combination of LAN and TAM on June 22, 2012. As of June 30 2012, TAM had a higher numbertotal of aircraft incorporationsUS$910.9 million in cash and marketable securities. Changes in our fleet. net cash generated from operating, investing and financing activities are described below.

Cash position and liquidity

The following table provides a summary of our cash flows from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and our total cash position as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

   2012  2011  2010 
   (in US$ millions) 

Net cash generated from operating activities

   1,203.8    767.7    1,125.3  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (1,926.4  (1,241.1  (1,100.4

Net cash used (provided) in financing activities

   1,005.2    216.9    (124.7

Effects of variation in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents

   (6.7  (0.1  (0.6

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

   374.4    631.1    731.5  

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

   650.3    374.4    631.1  

In addition to the cash and marketable securities LATAM has access to short term credit lines. As of December 31, 2012, LATAM had working capital credit facilities for a total committed amount of US$ 1.4 billion, of which $962 million was drawn as of December 31, 2012, and committed credit lines with a total available amount of US$208 million, of which $0 was drawn as of December 31, 2012.

Net cash generated from operating activities

Cash from operations derivesis derived primarily from providing air passenger and cargo transportation to customers. Operating cash outflows are primarily related to the recurring expenses of airline operations. operations, including fuel prices. Net cash generated from LATAM’s operating activities in 2012 increased US$441.2 million from US$762.6 million in 2011 to US$1,203.8 million in 2012, mainly due to the increase in operations following the combination of LAN and TAM on June 22, 2012. In addition, cash flows from operations in 2011 were reduced by US$84.0 million as a result of fine payments. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Cargo Operations—Cargo-Related Investigations.”

Net cash inflows from operating activities were US$762.6in 2011 decreased $357.6 million, in 2011,or 31.8%, from US$1,125.3 million in 2010, and US$845.8 million in 2009. The main reasons for the 32.2% decrease in 2011 from 2010 in net cash flows from operating activities wereprimarily as a result of the 37.2% increase in fuel prices during the period, as well as an increase in wages and benefits as a result of the consolidation as of January 2011 of Colombian airline Aires,LAN Colombia, the ongoing effects of the volcanic ash cloud on domestic operations in Chile and Argentina and the appreciation of local currencies in Latin America. Fuel prices and exchange rate fluctuations may continue to impact LAN’s operating cash flow generation in the future. Nevertheless, LAN continued to show solid traffic growth and yield increases in both passenger and cargo operations. The main reasons for the 33.0% increase in 2010 from 2009 in net cash flows from operating activities were the increase in passenger and cargo revenues as a result of traffic growth and yield increases, which outpaced the growth in operating costs and expenses.

In recent years, we have been able to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements through cash from our operations. Given the nature of our business, the Company generally benefits from having a positive working capital, i.e. actual cash flow movement (cash inflows).

Our working capital position at year-end 2011, and in previous year-ends, was negative. However, the Company has consistently generated cash inflows as a result of changes in working capital since current liabilities increased more than current assets during those periods. This occurs mainly as a result of advance ticket sales (i.e., services that are paid in advance before they are delivered and suppliers are paid), which are recognized as deferred revenues and constitute a distinctive characteristic of accounting of passenger revenue in the airline industry.

During 2011, the Company generated cash for US$114.0 million, as compared with US$326.7 million in 2010 and US$3.4 million in 2009, benefiting from an increase in its negative working capital position. We expect to continue generating positive working capital movements through our operations. However, we cannot predict whether current trends and conditions will continue, or how the effects of competition or other factors that are beyond our control could affect us.

Below please find a table providing a detailed calculation of our working capital position and working capital movements for the period 2009 through 2011:

   2009  2010  2011 
  (in US$ thousands) 

Current assets

    

Trade and other accounts receivable

   423,739    481,350    537,406  

Accounts receivable from related entities

   38    50    838  

Inventories

   46,563    53,193    72,787  

Current liabilities

    

Trade and other accounts payable

   476,597    645,571    645,086  

Accounts payable to related entities

   297    184    367  

Deferred Revenues

   493,034    721,042    868,557  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Working capital year-end position

   (499,585  (832,204  (902,979

Working capital movement

    

Cash inflows/(cash outflows)

   3,426    332,616    70,775  

As of December 31, 2011, the cash pledged to financial institutions relating to margin calls on derivative positions was US$117.2 million.

Net cash flows used in investing activities was US$1,238.3 million in 2011, US$1,100.4 million in 2010 and US$589.7 million in 2009. Cash capital expenditures were US$1,367.0 million in 2011, US$1,029.2 million in 2010 and US$538.6 million in 2009. The increase in capital expenditures in 2011 was due to the acquisition of higher number of aircraft and the required investments related to them.

Our capital expenditures for 2011 were mainly composed of:

cash contributions for pre-delivery deposits related to aircraft with deliveries in 2011, 2012 and 2013;

the acquisition of 13 Airbus A320 Passenger aircraft and three Boeing B767-300 Passenger aircraft; and

the acquisition of aircraft spare parts and spare engines.

Our capital expenditures for 2010 were mainly composed of:

cash contributions for pre-delivery deposits related to aircraft with deliveries in 2010, 2011 and 2012;

the acquisition of eight Airbus A320 Passenger aircraft and one Boeing B767-300 Passenger aircraft; and

the acquisition of aircraft spare parts and spare engines.

Our capital expenditures for 2009 were mainly composed of:

cash contributions for pre-delivery deposits related to aircraft with deliveries in 2009, 2010 and 2011;

the acquisition of three Airbus A319 Passenger aircraft and three Boeing B767-300 Passenger aircraft; and

the acquisition of aircraft spare parts and spare engines.

For more information about current and future capital expenditures, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures”. The difference between netNet cash used in investing activities in 2012 increased US$685.3 million from US$1,241.1 million in 2011 to US$1,926.4 million in 2012, primarily due to aircraft purchases which were partially offset by the inclusion of US$264.0 million of cash on the balance sheet of TAM. Aircraft purchases in 2012 included 14 narrow body aircraft and 18 wide body aircraft for a total of US$2,535 million.

Net cash capital expenditures duringused in investing activities increased US$137.9 million, or 12.5%, to US$1,238.3 in 2011 relates mainlyfrom US$1,100.4 million in 2010 primarily due to the investmentincrease in financial instruments,aircraft purchases.

Net cash used / (provided) in financing activities

Net cash used in financing activities increased by US$779.8 million from US$225.5 million to US$1,005.2 million in 2012, primarily due to increase long term debt related to new aircraft purchases. Of these 2012 aircraft purchases, approximately 85% of the sale of five A318 passengernet aircraft and the sale of Blue Express which was a subsidiary dedicated to ground courier services.prices were financed.

Net cash inflows from financing activities werein 2011 increased 343.8 million, to a net cash inflow of US$219.1 million in 2011 compared tofrom a net cash outflowsoutflow of US$124.7 million in 2010 and US$99.2 million of cash inflows in 2009. Such variance2010. This increase was primarily due to new issuance of shares, inflows from short term loans and the reduction in interest payments due to changes in loans structures and floating rate debt. In 2011,debt in 2011.

Sources of financing

Long term

We typically finance our main usesfleet with long-term loans covering between 80% and 100% of cash werethe net purchase price. We also finance our aircraft under sale and leaseback arrangements in order to add flexibility to our fleet. For more information regarding to the fleet financing, please refer to “—F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.”

From time to time in the past, we have considered, and may consider in the future, other forms of financing including securitization of ticket receivables or the issuance of additional debt or equity securities.

Short term

We have generally been able to arrange for short-term loans with local Chilean and international banks when we have needed to finance working capital expenditures or increase our liquidity. As of December 31, 2012, we maintained US$883.4762.5 million for loan payments, US$192.1 million for dividends payments and US$119.1 million for interest payments. In 2010, our main uses of cash were US$554.5 million for loan payments, US$155.4 million for dividends payments and US$128.7 million for interest payments. In 2009, our main uses of cash were US$261.7 million for loan payments, US$139.9 million for dividend payments and US$129.3 million for interest payments.

Our cash and cash equivalents including investment funds and domesticin committed short-term credit lines with both local and foreign bondsbanks.

We have in the past and may in the future also engage in advance sales of tickets to Multiplus as a source of cash. In the fourth quarter of 2012, for example, TAM Linhas Aéreas sold tickets for future delivery to Multiplus for total consideration of R$325,800,000.00 ($159 million). The price for the tickets was at a discount to the pricing that would otherwise apply under the operating agreement between TAM and Multiplus, with the discount related to the Brazilian inter-bank interest rates. Because the assets and liabilities of Multiplus are mainly heldconsolidated with those of LATAM and its other consolidated subsidiaries, these transactions have no impact on LATAM’s consolidated balance sheet. They do, however, provide a source of liquidity to TAM Linhas Aéreas while offering Multiplus a return on its cash balances. From the date of the business combination between LAN and TAM, Multiplus contributed to TAM Linhas Aéreas liquidity in U.S. dollars or U.S. dollar-based instruments. A fraction (around 22%)the amount of our cash position is heldR$611,629,485.29 (US$299 million), including US$159 million in currencies other than U.S. dollars to fulfill short-term obligations denominated in local currencies.sold tickets.

Capital Expendituresexpenditures

Our capital expenditures are related to the acquisition of aircraft, aircraft-related equipment, IT equipment, support infrastructure and the funding of pre-delivery deposits. OurLATAM’s capital expenditures totaled US$2,389.4 million in 2012 (including capital expenditures of TAM from June 23, 2012), US$1,367.0 million in 2011 and US$1,029.2 million in 2010 and US$538.6 million in 2009. The increase in capital expenditure is explained by a higher number2010. See “—Sources of aircraft acquired during 2011.financing” above.

The following chart sets forth our estimate, as of JanuaryDecember 31, 2012, of our future capital expenditures for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2016:2017 calendar years:

 

  Expenditures��by year, as of January 31, 2012   Estimated capital expenditures by year,
as of December 31, 2012
 
  2012 2013 2014 2015   2016   2013 2014 2015   2016 2017 
  (in US$ millions)   (in US$ millions) 

Expenditures on aircraft

   1,688    1,332    1,568    1,032     1,067     2,139    1,936    1,359     2,839    2,662  

PDPs (1)

   (310  (127  (213  18     (8   (238  (70  431     (69  (289

Purchase Obligations

   1,378    1,208    1,355    1,050     1,059     1,901    1,866    1,790     2,770    2,373  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Other expenditures(2)

   209    214    226    239     239     456    465    474     484    493  

Total

   1,587    1,422    1,581    1,289     1,298     2,357    2,331    2,264     3,254    2,866  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

(1) 

Pre-deliveryRepresents pre-delivery payments (inflows are presented asmade by LATAM, or inflows received by LATAM after the delivery of the aircraft is made, when the manufacturer refunds the PDP’sPDPs to LAN).LATAM.

(2) 

Includes expenditures on spare engines and parts, information technology and other expenditures.

The expenditures set out in the table above reflect payments for purchases and other fleet-related items, as well as for information technology and other items. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Fleet”. Principally, weFleet.” We have projected our capital expenditures based on:

the delivery of 12 Airbus A320-Family Aircraft in 2012, 14 in 2013, 17 in 2014, 15 in 2015, 12 in 2016, 10 in 2017 and 10 in 2018;

the delivery of nine Boeing B767-300 Passenger aircraft in 2012 and four in 2013;

the delivery of two Boeing 777 Freighter aircraft in 2012;

the delivery of two Boeing 787-8 passenger aircraft in 2012, three in 2013 and seventeen between 2014 and 2018;

the delivery of four Boeing 787-9 passenger aircraft in 2015;

the implementation of a new host system as a part of a three year capital expenditure plan, totaling approximately US$70 million; and

Costs related to the startup of new operations in the region under LAN’s standards.

We expect that cash generated from operations, short-term credit-lines and long-term syndicated loans with various banks will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements in the foreseeable future, although events that materially affect our operating results could also have a negative impact on our liquidity.anticipated deliveries of aircraft fleet. See “—F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations” below for a description of our purchase obligations, borrowings and other contractual commitments as of December 31, 2012.

C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

We believe that the LAN brandLATAM has strong value and it is synonymous of superior service in the Latin American and International airline industry. In March 2004, we launched our new “LAN” brand to bring together, under one strong international name, all our local brands such as “LAN Chile,” “LAN Peru,” “LAN Argentina” and “LAN Ecuador.” We developed our new brand and corporate image after an extensive process supported by a leading global branding agency.

We have registered the trademarks “LAN”,“LAN,” “LAN Chile,” “LAN Peru,” “LAN Argentina” and “LAN Ecuador” with the trademark office in Chile, Peru, Argentina and Ecuador, respectively. We license certain brands, logos and trade dress under the alliance agreement withoneworldoneworld® related to ourLAN’s alliance. WeAs long as LAN is a member ofoneworld®, it will have the right to continue to useoneworld® current logos on our aircraft while LANits aircraft.

TAM holds or has filed registration applications for 229 trademarks before theInstituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial, or INPI, the body with jurisdiction for registering trademarks and patents in Brazil, and 74 trademarks before the bodies with jurisdiction for registering trademarks in other countries in which TAM operates. Currently, TAM is a membernot aware of such alliance.any third-party challenges to these applications.

D. Trend Information

During 2012,2013, we expect to continue seeingto experience positive trends in boththe passenger and cargo operations, where we see significant growth opportunities in domestic and international markets in Latin America. Regarding fuelAmerica, and believe that the positive integration of LAN’s and TAM’s operations will allow us to start achieving the estimated synergies of the combination. Fuel prices they have remained relatively stable.stable thus far in 2013. Nevertheless, geopolitical instability, which affects the supply of fuel, is a potential risk since fuel supply is key to our business, as it represents approximately 30% of our operating costs.expenses. We can address increases in fuel prices through our fuel-hedging policy and the use of pass-through mechanisms for both the passenger and cargo operations. However, these strategies are never completely effective and our operating margins are negatively impacted by a higher fuel price scenario. Specifically, we expect to face:

 

revenue growth in the passenger operations, caused by capacity expansion inlinein line with traffic growth. During January and February 2012,2013, passenger traffic increased 13.6%5.3% compared with the same period in 2011,2012, driven mainly by solid growth on domestic operations in Chile, Perú, Argentina, Ecuador and Colombia, which increased 19.1%10.0% as compared to 2011, as well as 10.9% growththe same period in 2012. Domestic traffic in Brazil in January and February has continued to grow, and we continue to adjust capacity in that market, leading load factors to increase 9 points year to date to 79.8%. Traffic in our international operations.operations has also increased 5.4% during January and February. During such period, total passenger capacity increased 12.8%3.9%, leading to a 0.6 points1.1 point increase in passenger load factors from 82.5%78.7% to 83.1%79.8%. Capacity increases focused

mainly on domestic routes within Chile, regional routes within Latin America, and long-haul routes to the United States. This expansion was partially offset by decreased capacity on domestic routes within Brazil and on long haul routes to Europe, as a result of decreased demand on these routes in the first two months of 2013; and

cargo operations continue to be adversely affected by the challenging macroeconomic environment, which we expect to be compensated by strong export volumes from Latin America to the United States. This expansion was partially offset by decreased capacity on long haul routes to Europe as a result of itinerary changes implemented in early 2011;States and

growth in the cargo operations is expected to be driven by continued increase in imports to Latin America, mainly to Brazil, and continued recovery of export volumes, partly driven by further recovery of salmon exports. Europe. During January and February 2012,2013, cargo demand,traffic, as measured in RTKs, increased 0.7%decreased 0.3%, while capacity increaseddecreased by 3.1%. In turn,3.9% as compared to the same period in 2012. As a consequence, the cargo load factor decreased 1.52.3 points to 65.3%.54.0% as compared to the same period in 2012.

In 2012,2013, we expect to continue expanding and diversifying our revenue base through the expansion of our network, namely, by further developing our existing routes, adding new destinations, developing new alliances, and entering new markets. During 2012,2013, we expect to receive 1230 Airbus A320 familyA320-Family aircraft to operate domestic and regional routes, as well as nine6 additional wide-body passenger aircraft (Models Boeing 767-300 and the first two Boeing 787-8 DreamlinersDreamliners) for long-haul routes. We also expect the sale of fivethe remaining Airbus A318 aircraft and the return of two leased Boeing 767-300, while also returning three Boeing 737-700sA318 aircraft, the return of one leased A340 aircraft, and the return of one leased Dash 8-200 and two leased Dash 8-Q400 aircraft operated by LAN Colombia. See “Item 4.—B. Business Overview—Fleet.”

In the cargo business, we will continue addingto adjust capacity in response to weakened demand in our core markets.markets and to macroeconomic conditions. We expect the growth of import flows to Latin America to continue,recover, but weaker cargo markets globally might further drive additional competition to South America, especially Brazil. We will continue to monitor the cargo market trends on a weekly basis in order to react as soon as possible if necessary. Also, we plan to continue optimizingto optimize the utilization of the bellies of our passenger aircraft to maximize synergies associated with the Company’s integrated passenger/cargo business model. Cargo capacity growth in 2012 will be driven by the delivery of 2 Boeing 777 freighters in the second half of the year.

We continue to maintain significant flexibility to adjust the physical size of our fleet. Between 20122013 and 2014,2015, we will have 1318 operating lease expirations (including Japanese operating leases) in our wide-body passenger fleet, which can be terminated without cost. Starting in 2010, part of our Boeing 767 fleet has been fully paid, providing us with additional financial flexibility.

We also intend to make our cost structure more efficient and to offset potential decreases in demand with more efficient asset utilization, and we aim to enhance efficiency by streamlining our support processes, reducing commercial costs, continuing to develop our low-cost typedomestic business model for short-haul operations, and further developing the LEAN system in our processes.

WeAlthough we expect more stable fuel prices to remain stable for 2012, butthe remainder of 2013, we will continue usingto use fuel hedging programs and fuel surcharge mechanisms in both the passenger and cargo businesses to help minimize the impact of short-term movements in crude oil prices. For instance, as of March 15, 2012April 25, 2013 we have hedged approximately 58%65% of our estimated fuel requirements for the second quarter 2012, 27%2013, 23% for the third quarter and 8%16% for the fourth quarter. These hedging instruments are comprised of a combination of WTI and jet fuel collars and swaps. SwapsThese hedges are atfor an average price of US$92.2 dollars per barrel while collars are in average between US$71.6127 and US$95.798 dollars per barrel.in jet fuel prices.

E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 20112012 the Company had 110 aircraft (of which 65 are obligations of TAM and 45 are obligations of LAN) and 17 aircraft engines under operating leases. These operating leases provide us with great flexibility to adjust our fleet to any demand volatility that may affect the airline industry and therefore we consider such arrangements to be of great value.value to our strategy and financial performance. The total future lease payments related to our operating leases as of December 31, 2012 were US$1,469.0 million, for all remaining periods through maturity (the latest of which expires in 2020). See “—F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.”

Under the aforementioned operating leases, LANLATAM is responsible for all maintenance, insurance and other costs associated with operating these aircraft. The Company has not made any residual value or similar

guarantees to our lessors. There are certain guarantees and indemnities to other unrelated parties that are not reflected on the Company’s balance sheet, but we believe that these will not have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

The CompanyLATAM operates 1723 aircraft under a financing structure called Japanese Operating Lease (“JOL”). This method involvestax leasing structures. These methods involve the creation of a special purpose entityentities that acquiresacquire aircraft with bank and third party financing. Under IFRS, these aircraft are shown in the consolidated statement of financial position as part of “Property, plant and equipment” and the corresponding debt is shown as a liability. Of LATAM’s total tax leases, nine TAM tax leases are classified as operating leases due to accounting purposes as of December 31, 2012.

As of February 29,December 31 2012, we are not aware of any event, lawsuit, commitment, trend or uncertainty that may result in, or is reasonably likely to result in, the termination of the operating leases. See Note 33 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a more detailed discussion of these commitments.

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

We have contractual obligations and commitments primarily related to the payment of aircraft debt and lease arrangements, principal and interest on our long-term debt (which consists of senior notes and debentures issued by TAM), short term export-import credits and for the future incorporation of aircraft to our fleet.

The Company’s total aircraft debt (including EX-IM Bank guaranteed bonds, ECA guaranteed loans, commercial loans, JALCO structures and capital leases) as of December 31, 2012, was US$6,990.4 million. LATAM’s aircraft debt is mainly related to aircraft financing, which in general has 12 year repayment profiles. However, some financing structures feature a balloon payment or a purchase option at the end of the lease. By refinancing this balloon payment, the maturity dates of a number of our aircraft financings have been extended for another 3 to 8 years (some up to 20 years). Our 2012 aircraft acquisitions are described in further detail below under “—2012 Fleet Acquisitions.”

In addition, TAM has three series of senior notes, totaling approximately US$1,100 million, and one series of secured debentures outstanding. TAM’s senior notes comprise:

US$300 million due in 2017, with a fixed interest rate of 7.375% payable semi-annually, issued by TAM Capital Inc. and guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by TAM S.A. and TAM Linhas Aereas. These notes are listed on the Euro MTF market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. On December 18, 2007, TAM completed an exchange offer pursuant to which 99.2% of the holders exchanged these notes for new notes that are registered under the Securities Act and otherwise have identical terms;

US$300 million due in 2020, with a fixed interest rate of 9.5% payable semi-annually, issued by TAM Capital 2 Inc. and guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by TAM S.A. and TAM Linhas Aereas; and

US$500 million due in 2021, with a fixed interest rate of 8.375% payable semi-annually, issued by TAM Capital 3 Inc. and guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by TAM S.A. and TAM Linhas Aereas.

TAM Linhas Aéreas also issued R$600 million of secured debentures in July 2009 with a nominal value of R$1,000 each. On July 22, 2010, the shareholders of TAM agreed with holders of the secured debentures to extend the maturity of these debentures from July 24, 2013 to July 24, 2017. Amortization payments were also changed from quarterly payments to semiannual payments with the first repayment due January 24, 2012. The cost of this renegotiation was R$3,000. Interest payments on the debentures are paid monthly at a rate equivalent to 124% of the Brazilian CDI. As of December 31, 20112012, R$500 million of the debentures remained outstanding. The Company may exercise early redemption at any time, at its discretion, by sending or publishing a notice to debenture holders 10 days in advance. The early redemption can be total or partial.

As of December 31, 2012, TAM Linhas Aéreas was in non-compliance with the financial covenants of the debentures and TAM received a waiver of this breach of covenant by the Asamblea General de Debenturista. As a result, these obligations were classified within current financial liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2012 and will be classified as non-current liabilities in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The average interest rate of all of our long-term debt (which is our aircraft debt plus the senior notes issued by TAM) was 4.0% as of December 31, 2012. Of the total long-term debt amount, 62% accrues interest at a fixed rate (either through a stated fixed interest rate or through our use of interest rate swap agreements) or is subject to interest rate caps.

December 2012, LATAM had US$1,977 million in current debt liabilities. Of this amount, US$1,008 million was short-term debt (including US$245 million of the secured debentures issued by TAM which mature in 2017), which represents approximately 50% of our total current liabilities. The remaining US$970 million is composed mainly of amounts payable within the next 12 months related to aircraft financing.

Certain of LATAM’s credit agreements contain financial and other covenants. The Company’s short-term loans with local Chilean banks contain financial covenants applicable to the Company on a consolidated basis. At December 31, 2012, the Company is in compliance with these covenants.

Various EX-IM Bank loans signed by the Company for the financing of Boeing 767, 777 and 787 aircraft also contain financial covenants and other restrictions, including on the Company’s management in terms of its ownership and disposal of assets. In connection with the financing of spare engines for its Boeing 767, 767F, 777, 777F and 787 fleet, which are also guaranteed by the EX-IM Bank, financial covenants and other customary restrictions also apply. Additionally, with respect to various EX-IM Bank loans signed by Lan Cargo S.A. for the financing of Boeing 767F and 777F aircraft, financial covenants and other restrictions have been established to the Company´s management and its subsidiary Lan Cargo S.A. in terms of shareholder composition and disposal of assets.

As of December 31, 2012, we have financedalso had purchase obligations totaling US$14.2 billion, with deliveries between 2013 and 2019, as set forth below:

Airbus A320-Family, passenger aircraft deliveries: 148

Wide-body passenger aircraft deliveries (which include the Airbus A350 900XWB, the Boeing 767-300ER, the Boeing 777-300ER, the Boeing 787-8, and the Boeing 787-9): 56

Boeing 777-F, cargo aircraft deliveries: 2

LATAM is in the process of adjusting its fleet plan in order to match its capacity expansion plans to the expected competitive and macroeconomic environment on the international and domestic Brazil passenger markets. These initiatives are expected to reduce our purchase obligations between US$1.0 and US$1.2 billion between the years 2013 and 2017.

The following table sets forth our material expected obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2012:

   Payments due by period, as of December 31, 2012 
(US$ in millions)  Total   Less than 1
year
   1-3 years   3-5 years   More than 5
years
 

Long-term debt obligations(1)

  US$ 5,523    US$455    US$1,144    US$1,071    US$2,853  

Capital (finance) lease obligations

  US$3,074    US$453    US$832    US$699    US$1,090  

Operating lease obligations

  US$1,469    US$318    US$528    US$325    US$236  

Purchase obligations

  US$ 14,159    US$2,139    US$3,294    US$5,500    US$3,226  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL

  US$24,225    US$ 3,364    US$ 5,799    US$ 7,596    US$ 7,405  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Long-term debt obligations reflect principal payments on outstanding debt obligations, including aircraft debt and senior notes issued by TAM.

Currently, for accounting purposes, LATAM has reclassified TAM’s debentures as short-term debt obligations. The actual repayment profile of TAM’s debentures is set as follows:

   Payments due by period, as of December 31, 2012 
(US$ in millions)  Total   Less than 1
year
   1-3 years   3-5 years   More than 5
years
 

Debentures

  US$ 245    US$ 49    US$ 98    US$ 98    US$—    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2012 Fleet Acquisitions

During 2012, LATAM completed the acquisition of 21the following wide body aircraft:

9 Boeing 767-300 Passenger767-300ER passenger aircraft, and eightfinanced through EX-IM Bank guaranteed bond(s)

1 Boeing 767-300 Freighters787-8 passenger aircraft, financed through bond issuancesEX-IM Bank guaranteed bond(s)

2 Boeing 787-8 passenger aircraft, financed through commercial loan(s)

4 Boeing 777-300ER passenger aircraft, financed through EX-IM Bank guaranteed bond(s)

2 Boeing 777-F cargo aircraft, financed through EX-IM Bank guaranteed bond(s)

The EX-IM Bank financial obligations have a repayment profile of 12 years, with a level of support between 80% and syndicated loans provided by international financial institutions with the support of partial guarantees issued by the Ex-Im Bank with repayment profiles of either 12 or 15 years. The Ex-Im Bank guarantees support 85% of the net purchase price and areof the aircraft. The EX-IM Bank guarantee is secured with a first priority mortgage on the aircraft in favor of a security trustee on behalf of Ex-ImEX-IM Bank. We have financed the remaining 20%-15% of the net purchase price with commercial loans in the form of junior tranches or with own funds.

In the case of commercial financing for our Boeing 787-8 fleet, there is a senior tranche financing for 83% of the net purchase price of the aircraft plus a junior tranche for the remaining 17%. A first priority mortgage on the aircraft is in favor of a security trustee on behalf of the senior lender and a second priority mortgage on the aircraft is in favor of the junior lender. The documentation for each loan follows standard market forms for thisthe type of financing, including standard events of default. We

During 2012, LATAM completed the acquisition of the following narrow body aircraft:

9 Airbus A320-200 passenger aircraft, financed through ECA guaranteed loan(s)

8 Airbus A320-200 passenger aircraft, financed through sale and leaseback transaction(s)

2 Airbus A320-200 passenger aircraft, financed through JALCO tax product transaction(s)

3 Airbus A319-100 passenger aircraft, financed through ECA guaranteed loan(s)

All of the narrow body fleet received by LATAM in 2012 consists of Airbus A320-Family equipment. Aircraft financed by ECA-guaranteed loans have financed the remaining 15%an advance rate equal to 80% of the net purchase price of the aircraft for a 12 year period, with the remaining 20% of the aircraft being financed by the Company’s available cash flows.

Our purchases of Airbus A320-200s financed through the JALCO tax product structure, are 100% financed for a period of 10 years, with quarterly lease payments. The JALCO structure is a Japanese operating lease, in which LATAM does not hold the title to the aircraft but has a purchase option at the end of the lease.

Finally, aircraft financed through sale and leaseback transactions have lease terms between 6 to 8 years. These leases are denominated in U.S. dollars and have monthly payments.

All of our wide body and narrow body aircraft financings through EX-IM Bank bonds, ECA guaranteed loans or commercial loans or with our own funds. Our Ex-Im Bank supported financings are denominated in U.S. dollars and have quarterly amortizations with a combination of fixed and floating rates linked to U.S. dollar LIBOR. Through the use of interest rate swaps and fixed coupon Bond emissions in the case of Boeing aircraft, we

have effectively converted a significant portion of our floating rate debt under these loans into fixed rate debt. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Risk of Fluctuations in Interest Rates”,Rates,” for more information. Between 2004 and 2009, LAN sold its ownership in the entities borrowing some of these loans and they were therefore reclassified as financial leases. As of December 31, 2011, the total amount outstanding under our Ex-Im Bank-supported financings totaled US$1,259.2 million.

In April 2010, LAN entered into an agreement to finance the purchase of 15 aircraft partially guaranteed by the European Export Credit Agencies and partially through its own funds (85% and 15%, respectively) where six of them were delivered in 2010 and the remaining nine in 2011. These loans have a 12 years maturity profile and quarterly payments. During the second half of 2010 LAN financed eight additional A320 family aircraft supported by the European Export Credit Agencies and partially through its own funds (85% and 15% respectively).

During the year 2011 LAN continued financing its A320 family aircraft fleet supported by the European Export Credit Agencies totaling 13 additional aircraft. These aircraft were financed 80% by loans guaranteed by the European Export Credit Agencies and the remaining portion (20%) by LAN’s own funds.

In the first quarter 2011, LAN entered into a sale and lease back agreement to finance eight of its A320 family aircraft. Four of them were delivered in the third quarter of 2011 and the remaining four are expected to be delivered between April and July 2012.

Our total debt (including capital leases) as of December 31, 2011, was US$3,788.3 million compared to US$3,259.7 million in 2010 and US$3,074.4 million in 2009. The increase in long-term debt during 2011 relates to the incorporation of debt-financed fixed assets. We have minimum lease payment obligations primarily associated with our aircraft leases. As of December 31, 2011, we had 49 aircraft under operating leases (23 which correspond to recent acquired Aires total fleet), and we had minimum lease payment obligations of US$705 million compared to US$700 million as of December 31, 2010 and US$444 million as of December 31, 2009. The average interest rate of our long-term debt was 4.5% as of December 31, 2011. Of the total debt amount, 82.3% accrues interest at a fixed rate (either through a stated fixed interest rate or through our use of interest rate swap agreements) or is subject to interest rate caps. As of February 29, 2012, we also had purchase obligations for:

 

Seven Airbus A319, 52 Airbus A320, 10 Airbus A321, 20 Airbus A320 NEO;

13 Boeing 767-300 Passenger aircraft;

Two Boeing 777-200 Freighter aircraft; and

26 Boeing 787 Passenger aircraft;

The purchase obligations amount to a combined total of US$8,645.6 million, with delivery between 2012 and 2018.

LAN has practically no short term debt, while its long term debt is mainly related to aircraft financing and has 12 to 15 year repayment profiles. As of December 2011, LAN had US$537.3 million in bank loans under current liabilities. Of this amount, US$153.8 million was short term debt, which represents only 6.6% of total current liabilities. The remaining US$383.6 million is composed mainly of long term debt related to aircraft financing, which is payable within the next 12 months.

The following table sets forth our material expected obligations and commitments as of January 31, 2012:

   Payments due by period, as of January 31, 2012 
   Total   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   Thereafter 
   (in US$ millions) 

Principal debt payments

   2,538.2     273.4     288.8     270.4     271.9     275.6     1,158.2  

Interest debt payments

   341.0     68.2     64.1     54.7     46.2     37.5     70.2  

Capital leases(1)

   338.1     60.7     63.8     60.3     49.6     44.6     59.1  

Operating leases(2)

   689.0     150.0     157.7     121.4     92.3     77.1     90.4  

   Payments due by period, as of January 31, 2012 
   Total   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   Thereafter 
   (in US$ millions) 

Purchase obligations

   8,646.7     1,687.8     1,331.9     1,567.6     1,031.5     1,067.0     1,960.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   12,553.0     2,240.1     1,906.3     2,074.4     1,491.5     1,501.8     3,338.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Includes interests.

(2)

Includes aircraft leases and other non-cancelable leases.

ITEM 6.DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A. Directors and Senior Management

The management of LanLATAM Airlines Group is conducted by its board of directors which, in accordance with Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s by-laws, consists of nine directors who are elected every two years for two-year terms at annual regular shareholders’ meetings or, if necessary, at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting,, and may be re-elected. The board of directors may appoint replacements to fill any vacancies that occur during periods between elections. Scheduled meetings of the board of directors are held once a month and extraordinary board of directors’ meetings are called when summoned by the chairman of the board of directors and two other directors, or when requested by a majority of the directors.

The current board of directors was elected at the annualextraordinary shareholders’ meeting held on April 29, 2010.September 4, 2012. Its term expires in April 2012.September 2014. The following are Lan Airlines’ directors and senior management:LATAM Airlines Group’s directors:

 

Directors

  

Position

Jorge Awad MehechMauricio Rolim Amaro(1)  Director / Chairman
Darío Calderón GonzálezDirector
José Cox DonosoMaria Claudia Amaro(1)  Director
Juan José Cueto Plaza(2)Director
Juan Cueto Sierra(2)  Director
Ramón Eblen Kadis(3)  Director
Bernardo Fontaine TalaveraGeorges de Bourguignon ArndtDirector
José María Eyzaguirre Baeza  Director
Carlos Heller Solari(4)  Director
Gerardo Jofré Miranda  Director
Francisco Luzón LópezDirector

Senior Management

  

Position

Enrique Cueto Plaza(2)  Chief Executive OfficerCEO LATAM
Ignacio Cueto Plaza(2)  President and Chief Operating OfficerCEO LAN
Alejandro de la Fuente Goic  Chief Financial OfficerCFO LATAM
Marco Antonio BolognaCEO TAM
Armando Valdivieso Montes  Chief

Spanish Speaking Countries Executive Officer-PassengerVice-President

Cristián Ureta Larraín  Chief

Cargo Executive Officer-CargoVice-President

Roberto Alvo Milosawlewitsch  Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning and

Corporate DevelopmentFunctions Executive Vice-President

Cristian Toro CañasDamian Scokin  Senior Vice President, Legal
Enrique Elsaca HirmasSenior Vice President, Operations

International Unit Business Executive Vice-President

Emilio del Real Sota  Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Pablo Querol GrinsteinSenior Vice President, Corporate Affairs

HR Executive Vice-President

 

(1) 

Mr. Jorge Awad Mehech was re-elected chairmanMauricio Rolim Amaro and Mrs. Maria Claudia Amaro are brother and sister. Both are members of the board of directorsAmaro Group, which is defined in May 2010.“Item 7” as a “Major Shareholder” and are the TAM controlling shareholders.

(2) 

Messrs. Ignacio, Juan José and Enrique Cueto Plaza are brothers, and Mr. Juan Cueto Sierra is their father.brothers. All fourthree are members of the Cueto Group, (aswhich is defined in “Item 7”), as a “Major Shareholder,” and are the Controlling Shareholders.LATAM controlling shareholders.

(3) 

Mr. Ramón Eblen Kadis is a member of the Eblen Group, which is defined in “Item 7” as a “Major Shareholder.”

(4) 

Mr. Carlos Heller Solari is a member of the Bethia Group, which is defined in “Item 7” as a “Major Shareholder.”

Biographical Information

Set forth below are brief biographical descriptions of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s directors and senior management. All of LATAM’s directors were elected or reelected, as the case may be, in September 2012 for a two-year term, which expires in September 2014.

Directors

Mr. Jorge Awad MehechMauricio Rolim Amaro, 6642 years old, has served as chairman and member of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors since July 2001. Mr. Awad had previously served as chairman of ourJune 2012, was reelected to the board of directors from 1994 to October 2000.of LATAM in September 2012 and has served as Chairman since September 2012. Mr. Awad’sAmaro current term as chairman ends onin September 2014. Mr. Amaro has previously held various positions in the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012. He held the position of Senior Vice President of Fast Air from 1979 to 1993.TAM Group and served as a professional pilot at TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. and TAM Aviação Executiva S.A.. Mr. Awad is the Chairman of the Chilean Association of Banks and Financial Institutions andAmaro has been a member of the CouncilBoard of TAM S.A. since 2004, and vice-chairman of the Television Corporation of the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso. Additionally Mr. Awad serves on the board of directors of Banco de Chile.Board since April 2007. He is also a board memberan executive officer at TAM Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. and chairman of ICARE (Instituto Chileno de Administración Racional de Empresasthe boards of Multiplus S.A. (subsidiary of TAM S.A.), a Chilean organization seeking to promote private enterprise, and Prohumana, a Chilean organization that promotes corporate social responsibility within Chilean corporations.of TAM AviaçãoExecutiva e Taxi Aéreo S.A. As of February 29, 2012,28,2013, according to shareholder registration data in Chile, Mr. AwadAmaro shared in the beneficial ownership of Lan Airlines, through Inversiones y Asesorías Fabiola S.A., of 201,78465.554.075 common shares (0.06% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group (13.56% of LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares)., held by TEP Chile S.A. For more information see “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

Mr. Darío Calderón González,Mrs. Maria Claudia Amaro 65, 46 years old, has served on Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors since 1994. Mr. Calderón’sJune 2012 and was reelected to the board of directors of LATAM in September 2012. Mrs. Amaro’s term as a director ends on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012. Mr. CalderónSeptember 2014. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration and Marketing. Previously she served as Marketing Director at TAM Linhas Aéreas. She has been a partner in Calderón y Cía, a Chilean law firm,member of the Board of TAM S.A. since 1970. Mr. Calderón currently serves onSeptember 2003, and chairwoman of the board of directors of other Chilean companies, including Integramédica S.A., Imprenta A Molina Flores S.A., Enjoy S.A., and Datanet S.A. Mr. CalderónBoard since April 2007. She is also an Executive Officer at TAM Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. and a board member and chairman of Nutrechile A.G., a non-profit organization organized by all the concessionaries of theJunta de Auxilio Escolar y Becas (Board boards of Students Aid and Scholarships) of the Chilean Ministry of Education.

Mr. José Cox Donoso, 57 years old, has served on Lan Airlines’ board of directors from April 1994 to June 1995 and from September 1995 to the present. Mr. Cox’s term as a director ends on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012. Mr. Cox has also served as chairman of the board of directors of Lan Cargo since September 1995. In addition, Mr. Cox serves on the board of directors of CMB-Prime Administradora de Fondos S.A., Socovesa S.A., Puerto Coronel S.A., Puerto Angamos S.A., Kaufmann S.A., Asesorías e Inversiones IlihueMultiplus S.A. and Inversiones Tricahueof TAM AviaçãoExecutiva e Taxi Aéreo S.A. As of February 29, 2012, Mr. Cox28, 2013, according to shareholder registration data in Chile, Mrs. Amaro shared in the beneficial ownership of Lan Airlines, through Asesorías e Inversiones Ilihue Limitada, 2,654,32465.554.075 common shares of LanLATAM Airlines (0.78%Group (13.56% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares)., held by TEP Chile S.A. For more information see “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

Mr. Juan José Cueto Plaza,5152 years old, has served on Lan Airlines’LAN’s board of directors since 1994.1994 and was reelected to the board of directors of LATAM in September 2012. Mr. Cueto’s term as a director ends on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012.September 2014. Mr. Cueto currently serves as Executive Vice President of Inversiones Costa Verde S.A., a position he has held since 1990, and serves on the boards of directors of Consorcio Maderero S.A., Minera Michilla S.A., Inversiones del Buen Retiro S.A., Inmobiliaria e Inversiones Asturias S.A., Inversiones Mineras del Cantábrico S.A., Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., Sinergia Inmobiliaria S.A. and Valle Escondido S.A. Mr. Cueto is the son of Mr. Juan Cueto Sierra, a director of Lan Airlines, and the brother of Messrs. Enrique and Ignacio Cueto Plaza, ChiefLATAM Airlines Group Executive OfficerVice-President and Chief Operating Officer of Lan Airlines,LAN CEO, respectively. Mr. Cueto is a member of the Cueto Group (one of Lan Airlines’(LATAM Airlines Group’s Controlling Shareholders)Shareholder). As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, Mr. Cueto shared in the beneficial ownership of 115,399,502124,191,557 common shares of LanLATAM Airlines (33.90%Group (25.68% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares) held by the Cueto Group. Mr. Cueto is also a member of the board of directors of Holdco II. For more information see “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions”.Transactions.”

Mr. Juan Cueto Sierra, 82 years old, was one of the founders of Fast Air in 1978 and has served on Lan Airlines’ board of directors since 1998. Mr. Cueto’s term as a director ends on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012. Mr. Cueto has wide experience in a range of business activities. Mr. Cueto is the father of Messrs. Juan José, Enrique and Ignacio Cueto Plaza, Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Lan Airlines, respectively. Mr. Cueto currently serves on the board of directors of Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A.

Mr. Ramón Eblen Kadis, 6768 years old, has served on Lan Airlines’LAN’s board of directors since June 1994.1994 and was reelected to the board of directors of LATAM in September 2012. Mr. Eblen’s term as a director ends on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012.September 2014. Mr. Eblen has served as President of Comercial Los Lagos Ltda., Inversiones Santa Blanca S.A., and TJC Chile S.A. Mr. Eblen is a member of the Eblen Group (a major shareholder of Lan Airlines)LATAM Airlines Group). As of

February 29, 2012,28, 2013, Mr. Eblen shared in the beneficial ownership of 31,778,04923,778,049 common shares of LanLATAM Airlines Group (approximately 9.34%4.92% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares) held by the Eblen Group. For more information see “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions”.Transactions.”

Mr. Bernardo Fontaine Talavera,Georges de Bourguignon 47, 50 years old, has served on Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors since April 2005.September 2012. Mr. Fontaine’sde Bourguignon’s term as a director ends on the datein September 2014. Mr. de Bourguignon has been a partner and co-founder of Asset Chile SA, a Chilean investment bank, since 1994. He is currently member of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012.Mr. Fontaine was headboard of directors of the financial services branchcompany Sal Lobos, Chilean subsidiary of Falabella, a major Chilean retailer, andthe German group K+S. From 1990 to 1993 he served as executiveManager of Financial Institutions of Citibank SA in Chile. During 1993-2005 he was director of CMR Falabella and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Banco Falabella.Intergenesis Investment Fund Administrator. Mr. Fontaine also served as head of the M&A Corporate Finance division of Citicorp-Citibank Chile. Mr. Fontaine currently serves on the boards of Deutsche Bank Chile, Metro S.A., Bicecorp S.A., Banco Bice, Bice Vida S.A., Embonor S.A., Aquamont S.A., South-Am S.A., Fundación el Buen Samaritano, Place Vendome S.A. and Loginsa S.A., Fundación El Buen Samaritano and Fundación Convivir. He is also the general manager of Tres Mares S.A., Indigo S.A. and Sarlat S.A., whichde Bourguignon owned together, as of February 29, 2012,1,980,4082,795 common shares of LanLATAM Airlines S.A. (0.58%Group (0.00058% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares).

Mr. José María Eyzaguirre Baeza, 52 years old, has served on LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors since September 2012. Mr. Eyzaguirre’s term as a director ends in September 2014.Mr. Eyzaguirre has been a partner at Claro y Cia, a law firm in Chile, since 1993. During the practice of law, Mr. Eyzaguirre started in commercial litigation, then specialized in financial and capital markets and recently, and especially, in the areas of corporate nature, with special dedication to the area of mergers and acquisition of companies (cross-border). Currently Mr. Eyzaguirre is Director of Walmart Chile S.A. (since 2010), Komax S.A. (since 2010) and SociedadQuimica y Minera de Chile S.A. (since 2001). Previously, Mr. Eyzaguirre has participated in several companies’ boards, including Andina (until 2012) and AES Gener S.A. (until 2001).

Mr. Carlos Heller Solari, 5051 years old, joined Lan Airline’sLAN’s board of directors in May 2010.2010 and was reelected to the board of directors of LATAM in September 2012. Mr. Heller’s term as a director ends on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012.September 2014. Mr. Heller has a vast experience in the retail, transports and agriculture sectors. Mr. Heller is Vice President of Bethia S.A. (“Bethia”) (holding company and owner of Axxion S.A. and AxxdosBetlan Dos S.A.), Chairman of Axxion S.A., Club Hípico de Santiago, Sotraser S.A. and Agrícola Ancali. He also participates as a board of directors’ member of SACI Falabella S.A., Falabella Retail S.A., Sodimac S.A. , Titanium S.A., Viña Indómita S.A., Viña Santa Alicia S.A., Blue Express S.A. and Aero Andina S.A. Additionally he is the major shareholder and Vice President of “Azul Azul” (Universidad de Chile’s first division soccer team administrator). As of February 29,December 31, 2012, Mr. Heller directlyindirectly held 48,90030,157,644 common shares of LanLATAM Airlines (0.01% of Lan Airlines’ outstanding shares) and indirectly held 27,103,273 common shares of Lan AirlinesGroup through Axxion (7.96%S.A. and Betlan Dos S.A. (6.24% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares).

Mr. Gerardo Jofré Miranda, 6263 years old, has joined Lan Airlines’LAN’s Board of directors on May 2010.2010 and was reelected to the board of directors of LATAM in September 2012. Mr. Jofré’s term as a director ends on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2012.September 2014. Mr. Jofré is Chairman of Codelco and member of the boards of directors of Construmart S.A., Andromeda S.A., Inmobiliaria Playa Amarilla S.A. and Air Life Chile S.A. Mr. Jofré is President of Saber Más Foundation and member of the Real Estate Investment Council of Santander Real Estate Funds. From 2005 to 2010 he served as member of the boards of directors of Endesa Chile S.A., Viña San Pedro Tarapacá S.A., D&S S.A., Inmobiliaria Titanium S.A. and Inmobiliaria Parque del Sendero S.A. Mr. Jofré was Director of Insurance for America for Santander Group of Spain between the years 2004 and 2005. From 1989 to 2004 he served on Santander Group in Chile, as Vice Chairman of the Group and as CEO, member of the boards of directors and Chairman of many of the Group’s companies.

Mr. Francisco Luzón López, 65 years old, has served on LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors since September 2012. Mr. Luzón’s term as a director ends in September 2014. Currently Mr. Luzon serves as advisor of the Inter-American Development Bank (BID) and Leader-Guest Professor of the School of Business China-Europe (CEIBS) in Shanghai. Between 1999 and 2012, Mr. Luzon served as Executive Vice President for Latin America of Banco Santander. In this period, he was also Worldwide Vice President of Universia SA. Between 1991 and 1996 he was Chairman and CEO of Argentaria Bank Group. Previously, in 1987, was appointed Director and General Manager of BancoVizcaya and in 1988 Counselor and General Director Banking Group BBV. During his career Mr. Luzon has held positions on the boards of several companies most recently participating in the council of the global textile company Inditex-Zara from 1997 until 2012.

Senior Management

Mr. Enrique Cueto Plaza, 5354 years old, is Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s Chief Executive Officer and has held this position since 1994.(“CEO”). From 19931994 to 1994,2012, Mr. Cueto served on Lan Airlines’ boardwas the CEO of directors.LAN. From 1983 to 1993, Mr. Cueto was Chief Executive Officer of Fast Air, a Chilean Cargo airline. Mr. Cueto also served on the LAN board of directors from 1993 to 1994. Mr. Cueto has in-depth knowledge of passenger and cargo airline management, both in commercial and operational aspects, gained during his 2324 years in the airline industry. Mr. Cueto is an active member of theoneworldoneworld® Alliance Governing Board, the IATA (International Air Transport Association) Board of Governors. He is also member of the Board of the Federation of Chilean Industry (SOFOFA) and of the Board of the Endeavor foundation, an organization dedicated to the promotion of entrepreneurship in Chile. Mr. Cueto is the son of Mr. Juan Cueto Sierra, a member of the board of Lan Airlines, and the brother of Messrs. Juan José and Ignacio Cueto Plaza, member of the board and President and Chief Operating Officer of Lan Airlines,LAN CEO, respectively. Mr. Cueto is also a member of the Cueto Group (one of Lan Airlines’(LATAM Airlines Group’s Controlling Shareholders)Shareholder). As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, Mr. Cueto jointly shared in the beneficial ownership of 115,399,502124,191,557 common shares of LanLATAM Airlines (33.90%Group (25.68% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares) held by the Cueto Group. For more information see “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions”.Transactions.”

Mr. Ignacio Cueto Plaza, 4849 years old, is Lan Airlines’ President and Chief Operating Officer. Until being promoted to his current position in 2005,LAN’s CEO. Mr. Cueto served as President of LAN Cargo from 1995 to 1998, as Chief Executive Officer-Passenger Business a position he assumed in 1999.from 1999 to 2005, and LAN’s CEO since 2005. Mr. Cueto has previously served on the board of directors of Lan AirlinesLAN (from 1995 to 1997) and Ladeco from 1995 to 1997 and from(from 1994 to 1997, respectively.1997). In addition, Mr. Cueto served as Chief Executive Officer of Fast Air from 1993 to 1995 and as President of the LAN Cargo Group from 1995 to 1998.1995. Between 1985 and 1993, Mr. Cueto held several positions at Fast Air, including Service Manager for the Miami sales office, Director of Sales for Chile and Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Cueto is the son of Mr. Juan Cueto Sierra, director of Lan Airlines, and the brother of Messrs. Juan José and Enrique Cueto Plaza, Director and Chief Executive Officer of Lan Airlines,LATAM’s CEO, respectively. Mr. Cueto is also a member of the Cueto Group (one(which is a controlling shareholder of Lan Airlines’ Controlling Shareholders)LATAM). As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, Mr. Cueto shared in the beneficial ownership of 115,399,502124,191,557 common shares of Lan Airlines (33.90%LATAM (25.68% of Lan Airlines’LATAM’s outstanding shares) held by the Cueto Group. For more information see “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions”.Transactions.”

Mr. Alejandro de la Fuente Goic,5254 years old, is Lan Airlines’LATAM’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and has held this position since October 1995. Mr. de la Fuente joined Lan AirlinesLATAM in April 1995. Prior to joining Lan Airlines,LATAM, Mr. de la Fuente served as Chief Financial OfficerCFO of Chiquita Frupac Ltd., a subsidiary of Chiquita Brands Inc., beginning in 1992. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, Mr. de la Fuente owned 37,38370,000 common shares of LanLATAM (0.015% of LATAM Airlines (0.01% of Lan Airlines’Group’s outstanding shares).

Mr. Marco Bologna, 58 years old, is TAM’s CEO. He joined TAM in March 2001, when he was appointed Vice President for Finance and Management, and Market Relations Director. From 2004 to 2007 he served as President of TAM Linhas Aéreas, and in March 2009 he took over as President of TAM Aviação Executiva and Táxi Aéreo S.A. Since April 30, 2010 he has chaired the holding company TAM S.A., which brings together TAM Linhas Aéreas, TAM Airlines (formerly TAM Mercosur), Multiplus Fidelidade, and the maintenance unit TAM MRO. In February 2012 he was also appointed President of TAM Linhas Aéreas. Mr. Bologna has extensive experience in the aviation industry, and has worked in the financial markets for over 20 years.

Mr. Armando Valdivieso Montes,4950 years old, is Lan Airlines’ General Manager-Passenger, a position he assumed in 2006.LATAM’s Spanish Speaking Countries Executive Vice-President. Between 1997 and 2005 he served as Chief Executive Officer-Cargo Business.Business of LAN and from 2006 to date he has served as the General Manager-Passenger. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Valdivieso was President of Fast Air. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Valdivieso served as Vice President, North America of Fast Air Miami. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, according to shareholder registration data in Chile, Mr. Valdivieso owned 59,704 common shares of LanLATAM Airlines (0.02%Group (0.012% of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s outstanding shares).

Mr. Cristian Ureta Larrain, 49 years old, is Lan Airlines’LATAM’s Cargo Executive Vice-President. From 1998 and 2002, Mr. Ureta was LAN Cargo’s Planning and Development Vice-President and in 2002 he was promoted to Production Vice President. In 2005, Mr. Ureta assumed the position of General Manager-Cargo, a position he assumed in 2005.Manager-Cargo. Mr. Ureta has an Engineering degree from Pontificia Universidad Católica and a Special Executive Program from Stanford University. Between 2002 and 2005 Mr. Ureta served as Production Vice President for Lan Cargo. Between 1998 and 2002 he was Lan Cargo’s Planning and Development Vice President. Prior to that, Mr. Ureta served as General Director and Commercial Director at MASMas Air, and as Service Manager for Fast Air.

Mr. Roberto Alvo Milosawlewitsch, 4344 years old, is Lan Airlines’ Senior Vice-president Strategic Planning and Development, a position he assumed in 2008. Prior to holding his current position,LATAM’s Corporate Functions Executive Vice-President. Mr. Alvo has served in various roles within LAN since 2001, including as CFO of LanLAN Argentina from 2005 until 2008, as Vice-president of Development of LanLATAM Airlines Group from 2003 until 2005 and Vice-presidentVice-President of Treasury of LanLATAM Airlines Group from 2001 until 2003. He assumed the position of Senior Vice-President Strategic Planning and Development in 2008. Before 2001 Mr. Alvo held various positions at Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A., a leading non-metallic Chilean mining company. Mr. Alvo is a civil engineer and obtained an MBA from IMD in Lausanne, Switzerland.

Mr. Cristian Toro Cañas,Damian Scokin41, 46 years old, is Lan Airlines’ SeniorLATAM’s International Unit Business Executive Vice President, Legal, aPresident. He joined LAN in 2005. Prior to his current position, Mr. Scokin was responsible for LAN International business and CEO of LAN Argentina, where he assumedled the start up and development of LAN’s new subsidiary in January 2008. Mr. Toro has a law degree from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (1993), as well as a master’s law degree (MCJ 97’) from New York University.Argentina. Prior to joining Lan Airlines, Mr. Toro servedLAN, he developed an extensive career as General Counsel for Citibank Chile,a management consultant at McKinsey & Company, where he worked for 11 years. During his consulting experience Mr. Scokin worked in the United States, Great Britain, Chile, Brazil, Peru and held various positionsArgentina in a variety of projects. In 2000, Mr. Scokin was elected Partner of the Firm and in 2003 he became “Location Manager” of the Buenos Aires office, leading McKinsey’s practice in Argentina. Damian Scokin obtained his MBA from 1997 until 2007. He also workedHarvard Business School in 1995, after graduating as an international traineeBachelor in Economics (1991) and Industrial Engineer (1992) at Shearman & Sterling in New York (1999).

Mr. Enrique Elsaca Hirmas, 44 years old, is Lan Airlines’ General Manager-Chile, a position he assumed in 2008. Between 2004 and 2008, Mr. Elsaca served as Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning. Mr. Elsaca has a degree in industrial engineering from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, as well as a Master in Business Administration from Massachusetts Institutethe University of Technology. Prior to joining Lan Airlines, Mr. Elsaca served as Real Estate and Development Manager of Cencosud, Chile’s second largest retail group. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Elsaca worked at Booz Allen & Hamilton in Latin America, and from 1991 to 1995; Mr. Elsaca held various positions in Esso Chile, a subsidiary of Exxon.Buenos Aires.

Mr. Emilio del Real Sota 46, 48 years old, is Lan Airlines’ Senior Vice President, Human Resources,LATAM’s HR Executive Vice-President, a position he assumed (with LAN) in August 2005. Mr. del Real has a Psychology degree from Universidad Gabriela Mistral. Between 2003 and 2005, Mr. del Real was the Human Resource Manager of D&S, a Chilean retail company. Between 1997 and 2003 Mr. del Real served in various positions in Unilever, including Human Resource Manager for Chile, and Training and Recruitment Manager and Management Development Manager for Latin America.

Mr. Pablo Querol Grinstein, 35 years old, is LAN’s Senior Vice President of Corporate Affairs, a position he assumed in May 2011, replacing Rene Muga. Mr. Querol holds a degree in communications from the Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales and holds a management degree from an IAE Business School. Since 2004 Mr. Querol acted as Corporate Affairs Manager for LAN Argentina, where he served as main spokesman to media communications and governmental authorities. Previously, between 1995 and 2004, he was editor of the newspaperLa Nación and consultant to numerous companies related to the tourism and real estate industry. Since 2007, he has been director of the Argentinean Chamber of Tourism and the entity that promotes tourism, Destination Argentina. In addition, he is a permanent member of the Professional Council of Public Relations in Argentina, the Chilean-Argentinean Chamber and founder partner of the Buenos Aires Convention and Visitor Bureau.

B. Compensation

For the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, the aggregate amount of compensation we paid to all executives and senior managers was US$90.615.8 million, which did not include US$20.16.8 million paid as bonuses. Our variable compensation plan is based on our corporate profits, and team and individual performance.

Under Chilean law, LanLATAM Airlines Group must disclose in its annual report details of all compensation paid to its directors during the relevant fiscal year, including any amounts that they received from LanLATAM Airlines Group for functions or employment other than serving as a member of the board of directors, including amounts received as per diem stipends, bonuses and, generally, all other payments. Additionally, pursuant to regulations of the SVS,Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros de Chile (“SVS”), the Chilean securities regulator, the annual report must also include the total compensation and severance payments received by managers and principal executives, and the terms of and the manner in which board members and executive officers participate in any stock option plans.

Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s directors are paid 24 UF per meeting (56 UF for the chairman of the board). LanLATAM Airlines Group also provides certain benefits to its directors and executive officers, such as free and discounted airline tickets and health insurance. We do not have contracts with any of our directors to provide benefits upon termination of employment.

As set forth in further detail in the following table, in 20112012 the members of our board of directors currently in office received fees and salaries in the aggregate amount of US$184,639.69.164,607.20.

Board Members

  Fees (US$)(1) 

Jorge Awad MehechMauricio Rolim Amaro(2)

   47,062.5611,545.95  

Darío Calderón GonzálezMaria Claudia Amaro(2)

   13,035.60

José Cox Donoso

13,035.605,459.32  

Juan José Cueto Plaza

   13,035.60

Juan Cueto Sierra

13,035.6012,097.32  

Ramon Eblen Kadis

   29,681.7622,870.29  

Bernardo Fontaine TalaveraGeorges de Bourguignon(3)

   13,035.608,252.05

José María Eyzaguirre Baeza(3)

4,122.78  

Carlos Heller Solari

   13,035.6011,084.51  

Juan Gerardo Jofre Miranda

   29,681.7626,860.60

Francisco Luzón López(3)

3,664.70

Jorge Awad Menech(4)

26,539.08

Dario Calderon González(5)

5,925.75

José Cox Donoso(5)

5,925.75

Juan Cueto Sierra(6)

3,024.08

Bernardo Fontaine Talavera(4)

13,222.67

Jorge Salvatierra Pacheco(7)

3,958.35  

Total

   184,639.69164,607.20  
  

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Includes fees paid to members of the board of directors’ committee, as described below.

(2)

Mr. Amaro and Mrs. Amaro were appointed as directors in June 2012 and reelected as directors by LATAM’s shareholders in September 2012.

(3)

Each of these directors was elected to the LATAM board of directors in September 2012.

(4)

Director until September 4, 2012.

(5)

Director until June 28, 2012.

(6)

Director until April 26, 2012.

(7)

Director from April 26, 2012 to September 4, 2012.

As required by Chilean law, LanLATAM Airlines Group makes obligatory contributions to the privatized pension fund system on behalf of its senior managers and executives, but it does not maintain any separate program to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to these or any other employees.

C. Board Practices

Currently our BoardOur board of Directorsdirectors is currently comprised of nine members. The terms of each of our current Directorsdirectors will expire in April 2012.September 2014. See “—Directors and Senior Management”

above.

Committees

Board of Directors’ Committee and Audit Committee

Pursuant to Chilean Corporation Law, as amended by Law No. 19,705, LanLATAM Airlines Group must have a board of directors’ committee composed of no less than three board members. LanLATAM Airlines Group has established a three-person committee of its board of directors, which, among other duties, is responsible for:

 

examining the reports of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s external auditors, the balance sheets and other financial statements submitted by Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s administrators to the shareholders, and issuing an opinion with respect thereto prior to their presentation to the shareholders for their approval;

 

proposing external auditors and rating agencies to the board of directors;

 

evaluating and proposing external auditors and rating agencies;

 

reviewing internal control reports pertaining to related party transactions;

 

examining and reporting on all related-party transactions; and

 

reviewing the pay scale of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s senior management.

Under Chilean law we are required, to the extent possible, to appoint a majority of independent directors to the Board of Directors Committee. The corresponding independence requirements are set forth in Chilean Corporation Law as amended by Law No. 19,705, and relate to the relationship between the directors and the shareholders that control a corporation. A director is considered independent when he or she can be elected regardless of the voting of the controlling shareholders. See “Item 16A.16. G. Corporate Governance.”

Pursuant to U.S. regulations, we are required to have an audit committee of at least three board members, which complies with the independence requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Given the similarity in the functions that must be performed by our Board of Directors’ Committee and the audit committee, our Board of Directors’ Committee serves as our Audit Committee for purposes of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

As of February 29, 2012,March 30, 2013, all of the members of our Board of Directors’ Committee, which also serves as our Audit Committee, were independent under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. As of February 29, 2012,March 30, 2013, the committee members were Mr. Jorge Awad Mehech, Mr. Gerardo Jofré Miranda, and Mr. Ramón Eblen Kadis.Kadis and Mr. Georges de Bourguignon Arndt. We pay each member of the committee 32 UFs per meeting.

LATAM Board Committees

After the effective time, LATAM’s board of directors also has established four other committees to review, discuss and make recommendations to our board of directors. These include a Strategy Committee, a Leadership Committee, a Finance Committee and a Brand, Product and Frequent Flyer Program Committee. The Strategy Committee focuses on the corporate strategy, current strategic issues and the three-year plans and budgets for the main business units and functional areas and high-level competitive strategy reviews. The Leadership Committee focuses on, among other things, group culture, high-level organizational structure, appointment of the LATAM CEO and his or her other reports, corporate compensation philosophy, compensation structures and levels for the LATAM CEO and other key executives, succession or contingency planning for the LATAM CEO and performance assessment of the LATAM CEO. The Finance Committee is responsible for financial policies and strategy, capital structure, monitoring policy compliance, tax optimization strategy and the quality and reliability of financial information. Finally, the Brand and Frequent Flyer Program Committee is responsible for brand strategies and brand building initiatives for the corporate and main business unit brands, the main characteristics of products and services for each of the main business units, frequent flyer program strategy and key program features and regular audit of brand performance.

D. Employees

The following table sets forth the number of employees in various positions at the Company.

 

Employees

  As of December 31, 2011   As of December 31, 
  2011(2)   2010(1)   2009   2012(3)   2011(2)   2010(1) 

Administrative

   4,170     3,940     3,106     8,980     4,170     3,940  

Sales

   2,750     2,643     2,352     4,858     2,750     2,643  

Maintenance

   2,918     2,576     2,264     6,932     2,918     2,576  

Operations

   6,194     5,730     4,852     18,138     6,194     5,730  

Cabin crew

   3,837     3,561     2,890     10,164     3,837     3,561  

Cockpit crew

   1,969     1,835     1,380     4,527     1,969     1,835  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   21,838     20,285     16,844     53,473     21,838     20,285  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)LAN’s acquisition of Aires in November 2010 provided an additional 1,319 employees to the Company’s total number of employees.
(2)By the end of 2011, approximately 52% of our employees worked in Chile, 46% in other Latin American countries and 2% in the rest of the world.
(3)2012 figures include both LAN and TAM employees which as of December 2012 were 23,099 employees from LAN and 30,500 employees of TAM and its affiliates (including Multiplus).

We have a performance-related pay structure for our administrative, management and flight personnel (such as cabin crew members, airport and sales agents, call-center employees, and some back office employees) including performance-based bonuses and pay scales that reward foreign language proficiency among counter, technical and administrative personnel. During 2011, over 92%2012, 93% of our employees were eligible to receive performance related bonus payments that are linked to personal, team and corporate performance. TAM executives participate in the same program described below. For other employees there is a profit sharing program, which is a variable pay program based on the Company’s financial performance.

We provide our employees with medical insurance complementary to the coverage of the private health system, and also grant other benefits, such as free and discounted airline tickets, to our permanent employees.

A stock option compensation plan is offered to key senior executives. For a detailed description of the stock option compensation plan, please see Note 3638 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.2012.

As required by Chilean law, we make obligatory contributions to the privatized pension fund system on behalf of our employees, but we do not maintain any separate program to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to these or any other employees. However, the pilots’ collective bargaining agreement includes a clause that permits resignation with severance payment, in case a pilot reaches a certain age and is still providing services to the company. In Brazil TAM offers a private pension plan to its executives and pilots.

Long Term Incentive Compensation Program

On April 5, 2007,December 21, 2011, the extraordinary shareholders meeting approved a capital increase of 22,090,910142,355,882 shares to a total of 341,000,000488,355,791 shares. The same meeting designated 10% of the approved capital increase (2,209,091 shares)4,800,000 shares for purposes of a proposed employee stock option compensation plan. Those 2,209,0914,800,000 shares represent a 0.65%0.98% of the total share capital after such capital increase. The shareholders’ meeting authorized our board of directors to elaborate the compensation plan. For more detailed information, please see Note 36 to our audited consolidated financial statements. This incentive compensation program is aimed at promoting our interests by encouraging senior management employees to contribute substantially to our success, by motivating them with stock options.

The general features of this stock option plan are:

 

 (a)The selection of the employees of the Company and its subsidiaries that were included by the Board of Directors in the compensation plan was made after a recommendation by our Executive Committee. A stock option agreement was signed with each selected employee for the number of options in connection to the acquisition of our shares to be allocated to such employee.

 

 (b)Until the shares in the option are subscribed, the optionee has no economic or political rights and is not considered in the quorums of shareholders meetings.

 

 (c)The options allocated to each employee are vested in parts, on the following two dates: (1) 30% on October 29, 2009;December 21, 2014; (2) 30% on December 21, 2015; and (2) 70%(3) 40% on October 30, 2011,June 21, 2016, subject to remaining employed by the Company.

 

 (d)The period during which the employee must exercise the options will expire March 31, 2012.December 21, 2016. If the employee has not exercised or waived the options in that period, the employee will be understood, for all purposes, to have waived the options and, accordingly, all rights, powers, promises or offers in relation to the subscription of cash shares in the Company will be deemed extinguished and it will be understood that the employee has irrevocably waived all rights or powers in relation thereto, releasing us from any obligation.

 

 (e)

The price payable for these shares if the respective options are exercised is the equivalent to US$14.50,23.19, adjusted by the variation in theConsumer Price Index (“CPI”) published monthly by the U.S. Department of Labor, from

the date it was set by our Board of Directors to the date of subscription and payment of the shares. Such price shall be paid in Chilean pesos, at once, in the act of subscription, in cash, by bank check, electronic fund transfer or any other instrument or paper representing money payable on demand, converted at the observed dollar exchange rate published in the Official Gazette on the same date as subscription and payment of the shares. In any case, the per-share price payable by the employee if the option is exercised may be no less than US$14.50.

The selection of the employees that participatedfor participation in the stock option plan was based on, among other criteria that the Board determined at the time of employment with the Company, the position they hold, their importance in earning profits, the responsibility of thetheir position, they hold, the amount of equity managed, the ability to work as a team, and performance, and the potential for development and importance within the Company given their education and experience.

The original termsOn January 2, 2013, Stock Option Contracts were issued by the Company to 46 employees of the Company and its subsidiaries for a total of 4,382,000 stock options. This stock option plan were most recently amended on October 25, 2011 when a new expiration date was established.excludes members of the Cueto group, the LATAM Controlling Shareholders, that serve as senior management of the Company.

Training

Some of our employees, such as the flight operations, maintenance and customer ground operations personnel undergo training when they join the Company and throughout their employment with us. For this training, weLATAM invested US$12.5 48.7 million in 2009, US$13.5 million in 2010 and US$ 20.6 million in 2011. We generally recruit our pilots from theAcademia de Ciencias Aeronáuticas (at theUniversidad Técnica Federico Santa María), aeroclubs and the armed forces. Before being promoted to the position of captain, first officers must have logged at least 4,000 flight hours and received the approval of a special pilots’ committee. We provide ground-school training in Santiago, as well as in Lima and Quito for our Peruvian and Ecuadorian crews.2012. We maintain an agreement with CAE (a Canadian firm specializing in flight simulators and training centers) to develop a pilot training center in Santiago de Chile.Chile and Sao Paulo. This training center includes two Airbus A320 and one Boeing 767 Full Flight simulators plus 1 MFTD A320/340 simulator. Our pilot staff also receives simulator training at sites in the United States and Brazil.States.

Our pilots are rated for only one aircraft type by local aeronautical authorities, and they are not cross-qualified between two or more aircraft types. Chilean regulationsRegulations require pilots to be licensed as commercial pilots for a first officer position and as an airline transport pilot for a captain position, with specific type, function and special ratings for each aircraft to be flown, and to be medically certified as physically fit. Licenses and medical certifications are subject to periodic reevaluation, including flight simulator recurrent training, ground recurrent training, annual emergency procedures training, safety and security training and recent flying experience. Our pilots receive a variety of training, such as lectures, simulations and gaming and computer based training. Cabin crew must have initial and periodic competency fitness training.

Aircraft mechanics and maintenance supervisory personnel must be licensed by the DGAC and other corresponding authorities in other countries in which we operate. We train our technicians (Mechanics, Specialists, Inspectors and Maintenance Supervisors) in all programs required by both local authority (DGAC) and international authorities and aviation associations, such as the FAA, the European Aviation Safety Agency (“EASA”), IATA rules and regulations, those required by aircraft manufacturers and the training needs that we identify during our annual reviews. The program of study contains initial and continuing training. Initial training is level III ATA SPEC 104 and lasts forty to fifty days depending on the aircraft types and continuing training lasts up to five to six days.

During 2011,2012, we continued training sales and administrative personnel in areas such as service and sales quality. We also continued delivering learning programs to develop leadership skills and others with different methodologies including e-learning.

Labor Relations

We have negotiated longer-term labor contracts with the labor unions in anticipation of their scheduled expirations, which under Chilean law are limited to a period of four years. In general, the expiration of our labor agreements with the several unions that represent our pilots and other personnel are staggered in a way that we avoid being in the position of having to renegotiate contract terms with substantially all of our pilots or other personnel at the same time.

Two collective contracts are in place between Lan Airlines and its pilots, both through the pilots’ union. Non-unionized pilots (less than 5% of the pilot corps), have the same benefits, through direct extension of the union’s collective agreement. These contracts were negotiated in February 2009 and expire between August 2012 and January 2013. Lan Cargo is also a party to an employment agreement with its pilots that expires in November 2012. Finally, Lan Express has two collective agreements with its pilots, both unionized and non-unionized. Those contracts expire between September and December 2012.

Lan Airlines and its affiliates have also entered into collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) with many of their employees:

Lan Airlines renewed the CBAs with its maintenance personnel in June 2008 for a period of four years. On March 30, 2011, the collective bargaining agreement with maintenance personnel working for Lan Express, one of LAN’s Chilean subsidiaries, was renewed until March 31, 2015.

LAN’s CBA with the union representing our administrative personnel has been renewed in Februrary 2012, and expires in December 2015, and the CBA with Lan Express administrative personnel expires in April 2013.

The majority of Lan Argentina’s employees belong to industry-wide unions. Currently, labor relations are stable. In 2005, Lan Argentina hired employees from another airline and agreed to maintain their employment conditions and labor stability during a three-year period. The conditions and labor relations that Lan Argentina had to maintain expired on September 2008, a situation that did not generate any conflict for the company. In December 2009, salary agreements were finalized with the five unions in Lan Argentina. These agreements expired on September 2010 and were renewed in September 2011 for one year. In Lan Peru and Lan Ecuador, meanwhile, the employment relationship is smooth and stable. With respect to Lan Ecuador, there is a collective agreement in force since October 2010 with Pilots (non-union), whose duration is 3 years and 6 months. The only union that exists in this country is the Cabin Crew. It still has no legal authority to negotiate collective agreements with the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company maintains a relationship with the union continuing to address issues of common interest and welfare. Lan Peru negotiated in 2010 a collective agreement with the union of technical and mechanical, with a duration of 4 years. The next collective bargaining with the union will occur in June 2012.

We believe we generally maintain good relations with our employees and the unions, and expect to continue to enjoy good relations with our employees and the unions in the future. We also believe that we have built a solid base among our employees that will support and facilitate our growth plans. We can provide no assurance, however, that our employee compensation arrangements may not be subject to change or modification after the expiration of the contracts currently in effect, or that we will not be subject to labor-related disruptions due to strikes, stoppages or walk-outs.

Chile

We have negotiated longer-term labor contracts with the labor unions in anticipation of their scheduled expirations, which under Chilean law are limited to a period of four years. In general, the expiration of our labor agreements with the several unions that represent our pilots and other personnel are staggered in a way that we avoid being in the position of having to renegotiate contract terms with substantially all of our pilots or other personnel at the same time.

During 2012, we renegotiated our collective bargaining agreements with our pilots’ union, which will be effective until 2016. Non-unionized pilots have the same benefits as unionized pilots, through a direct extension of the union’s renegotiated agreement. We also negotiated agreements with pilots working for our subsidiaries, LAN Express and LAN Cargo, which agreements will also be in effect until 2016.

We have also entered into or renegotiated collective bargaining agreements with many of our other employees in Chile during 2012, including general airport, maintenance and supply staff of LATAM; administrative staff of LAN Express; and administration staff of LAN Cargo. Each of these agreements is effective for a four-year term, until 2016.

Ecuador

In Ecuador, two employee associations were formed (mechanical and airport/administration) in 2012. These employee associations maintain relations with the Company, but do not have the right to enter into or negotiate collective bargaining agreements under Ecuador law.

Also in Andes, a union of ground handling employees has been formed and will be legally constituted in 2013. As of today there is no process of negotiations or bargainings agreements with this union.

Argentina

In Argentina, the majority of LAN Argentina’s employees belong to industry-wide unions. In December 2012, salary agreements were finalized with the five unions in LAN Argentina. These negotiations are held annually.

Peru

LAN Peru is currently negotiating with its pilot’s union, and it expects to complete these negotiations and finalize a collective bargaining agreement with the union during the first quarter of 2013.

Brazil

Under Brazilian law the validity of collective bargaining agreements is limited to two years. TAM’s collective bargaining agreements are valid for one year (for the economic clauses) and for two years (for social clauses). TAM has historically negotiated collective bargaining agreements with eight unions in Brazil—one aeronauta union, which represents the functions of flying workers (pilots, copilots and flight attendants), and seven aeroviário unions, which are TAM employees who exercise their duties on the ground to support TAM’s operations. In December 2012, TAM renegotiated collective bargaining agreements with all unions, which included a wage increase of 8% for ground workers earning minimum wage, and an increase of 6% for other salaried ground workers and flying workers, and the inflation rate for the period was 5.95%. Although 97% of wage negotiations in Brazil increased real wages above inflation, we believe that the readjustment signed for our sector was positive, since most of the workers had an adjustment within the percentual inflation. During negotiations, no stoppage occurred.

E. Share Ownership

As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, the members of our Board of Directors and our executive officers as a group own 51.43%50.42% of our shares. See “Item 7. Controlling Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

For a description of stock options granted to our Board of Directors and our executive officers, see “—Compensation—Employees—Long Term Incentive Compensation Program”.Program.”

 

ITEM 7.CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A. Major Shareholders

As of February 29, 2012, theThe Cueto Group controlled the Company. The Cueto Groupis LATAM’s controlling shareholder and it is comprised by Mr. Juan Cueto Sierra, Mr. Juan José Cueto Plaza (one of our directors), Mr. Ignacio Cueto Plaza (the CEO LAN), Mr. Enrique Cueto Plaza (the CEO LATAM) and certain other family members.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2010, the Piñera Group (which was comprised by Mr. Sebastián Piñera Echenique and certain members of his family), which owned 26.3% of the voting common shares as of December 31, 2009, commenced to sell its ownership of the Company after Mr. Sebastián Piñera Echenique was elected as the new president of Chile.

On March 9, 2010, the Cueto Group acquired an 8.6% stake of the Company from the Piñera Group. As a result of this transaction, the shareholders agreement between the two groups was terminated.

In addition, the Piñera Group sold 9.8% of the Company through two auctions in the SSE, which took place on February 25, 2010 and on March 25, 2010, respectively.

Finally, on March 24, 2010, the Piñera Group signed an agreement to sell an additional 8.0% stake in the Company to Bethia S.A.

As a result of the above, the Cueto Group controls the Company. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, the Cueto Group owned 33.90%25.68% of the votingLATAM Airlines Group’s common shares. This Controlling ShareholderThe Cueto Group is entitled to elect fourthree of the nine members of our board of directors and is in a position to direct the management of the Company. The Cueto Group, which we also refer to as the “LATAM controlling shareholders,” have entered into a shareholder’s agreement with LATAM, TEP Chile and the TAM controlling shareholders. See “—Shareholders’ Agreements.”

Following our combination with TAM, the Amaro Group is also a major shareholder of LATAM Airlines Group. The Amaro Group, which we also refer to as the “TAM controlling shareholders,” are controlling shareholders of TAM, through their 100% ownership of TEP Chile and majority ownership of Holdco I voting shares, which owns 100% of the common shares of TAM. The Amaro Group’s members include our chairman Mauricio Rolim Amaro and our director Maria Claudia Amaro. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, the Amaro Group owned 13.56% of LATAM Airlines Group’s common shares. The Amaro Group has entered into a secondshareholder’s agreement with LATAM and the LATAM controlling shareholders. The terms of this shareholder group, which includes our director Ramón Eblen Cádiz, owned 9.34%agreement require the LATAM controlling shareholders to vote to elect individuals nominated by TEP Chile as members of our common shares. Alsoboard of directors. See “—Shareholders’ Agreements.”

In addition to these shareholders, there are two other major shareholder groups. As of February 28, 2013, the Bethia Group, which includes our director Carlos Heller Solari, owned 7.96%6.24% of LAN’sour common shares and the Eblen Group, which includes our director Ramón Eblen Cádiz, owned 4.92% of our common shares.

The table below sets forth the beneficial ownership of common sharesowners, as of February 29, 2012, broken down between28, 2013, of our Controlling Shareholders,common shares, including our controlling shareholders, other major shareholders (beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company) and minority shareholders.

 

   

Beneficial ownership

(as of February 29, 2012)

 
   Number of shares
of common stock
beneficially owned
   Percentage of
common stock
beneficially owned
 

Shareholder

    

Cueto Group

   115,399,502     33.87

Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A.

   90.575.407     26.58

Inversiones Mineras del Cantábrico S.A.

   7,079,095     2.08

Inversiones Nueva Costa Verde Aeronautica Limitada

   17.745.000     5.21

Eblen Group

   31,778,049     9.33

Inversiones Andes S.A.

   22.288.695     6.54

Other

   9,489,354     2.78

Bethia Group(1)

   27.103.273     7.95

Axxion S.A.

   13.551.637     3.98

Axxdos S.A.

   13.551.636     3.98

Others

   166,456,825     48.85
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   340,737,649     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Additionally as of February 29, 2012, Mr. Carlos Heller, Bethia´s Vice President owned directly 48,900 common shares of Lan Airlines (0.01% of Lan Airlines’ outstanding shares)

On July 6, 2007, the SVS fined Juan José Cueto Plaza 1,620 UF (approximately US$74,000) in connection with the purchase of Shares that he carried out through Inversiones Mineras del Cantábrico on July 24, 2006. The SVS considered that such purchase had breached an obligation not to acquire Shares until the financial statements of the company became publicly available, in alleged violation of Article 165, paragraph 1 of Law No.18,045 of October 22, 1981. The SVS ruled that, although Mr. Cueto had not used any privileged information, LAN’s financial statements should be considered to be privileged information per se, and thus, created a duty to abstain from trading the securities prior to the disclosure of the financial statements. On July 26, 2007 Juan José Cueto filed an appeal of this fine before the 27° Civil Court of Santiago, which was dismissed on January 8, 2009. The defense of Mr. Cueto filed two legal recourses against the first dismissal, which were rejected by the Court of Appeals of Santiago on March 8, 2010. Against this second dismissal Juan José Cueto filed two additional and separate legal recourses, which as of this date are pending before the Supreme Court of Chile. A final decision is pending.

  Beneficial ownership
(as of February 28, 2013)
 
  Number of shares
of common stock
beneficially owned
  Percentage of
common  stock

beneficially owned
 

Shareholder

  

Cueto Group

  124,191,557    25.68

Costa Verde Aeronautica S.A.

  83,179,281    17.20

Inversiones Nueva Costa Verde Aeronautica Ltda.

  16,954,095    3.51

Costa Verde Aeronautica SpA

  20,000,000    4.14

Others

  4,058,181    0.84

Amaro Group

  65,554,075    13.56

TEP Chile S.A.

  65,554,075    13.56

Bethia Group.

  30,157,644    6.24

Axxion S.A.

  16,994,337    3.55

Axxdos S.A.

  13,163,307    2.83

  Beneficial ownership
(as of February 28, 2013)
 
  Number of shares
of common stock
beneficially owned
  Percentage of
common  stock

beneficially owned
 

Eblen Group.

  23.778.049    4.92

Inversiones Andes S.A.

  14,288,695    2.98

Others

  9,489,354    1.98

All other minority shareholders

  239,874,466    49.61
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  483,555,791    100.00
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, investors outside of Chile held 3.02%6.04% of our capital stock in the form of ADSs, and 1.10% in the form of BDSs. Chilean pension funds held 15.06%17.03% of our capital stock and other minority investors held 30.78%25.44% in the form of common shares. It is not practicable for us to determine the number of ADSs or common shares beneficially owned in the United States. As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, we had 1,6721,594 record holders of our common shares. It is not practicable for us to determine the portion of shares held in Chile or the number of record holders in Chile.

All of our shareholders have identical voting rights.

Shareholders’ AgreementAgreements

As described above under “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Combination of LAN and TAM,” following the combination of LAN and TAM in June 2012, TAM S.A. continues to exist as a subsidiary of Holdco I and a subsidiary of LATAM, and LAN Airlines S.A. has been redesignated as “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.”

Prior to the consummation of the business combination, LATAM Airlines Group and the LATAM controlling shareholders entered into several shareholders agreements with TAM,the TAM controlling shareholders (acting through TEP Chile) and other parties have entered into shareholders agreementsHoldco I that establish agreements and restrictions relating to corporate governance in an attempt to balance LAN’sLATAM Airlines Group’s interests, as the owner of substantially all of the economic rights in TAM, and the TAM controlling shareholders, as the continuing controlling shareholders of TAM under Brazilian law, by prohibiting the taking of certain specified material corporate actions and decisions without prior supermajority approval of the shareholders and/or the board of directors of Holdco I or TAM. These shareholder agreements also set forth the parties’ agreement regarding the governance and management of the LATAM Airlines Group following the consummation of the business combination of LAN and TAM.

Governance and Management of LATAM Group

We refer to the shareholders agreement among the LATAM controlling shareholders and TEP Chile, which sets forth the parties’ agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of the LATAM Group, and voting and transfer of their respective LATAM Airlines Group common shares and TEP Chile’s voting shares of Holdco I, as the “control group shareholders agreement.” We refer to the shareholders agreement between us and TEP Chile, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of the LATAM Group as the “LATAM Airlines Group-TEP shareholders agreement.” The control group shareholders agreement and the LATAM Airlines Group-TEP shareholders agreement set forth the parties’ agreement on the governance and management of the LATAM Group following the effective time.

This section describes the key provisions of the control group shareholders agreement and the LATAM Airlines Group-TEP shareholders agreement. The rights and obligations of the parties to the control group shareholders agreement and the LATAM Airlines Group-TEP shareholders agreement are governed by the express terms and conditions of the aforementioned shareholders agreements and not by this summary or any other information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F. The description of these control group shareholders agreement and the LATAM Airlines Group-TEP shareholders agreement summarized below and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the aforementioned shareholders agreements, which are incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F. For a full understanding of these agreements, we advise you to read these agreements carefully and in their entirety.

Composition of the LATAM Airlines Group Board

Mr. Maurício Rolim Amaro and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro were elected to the LATAM Airlines Group board of directors in June 2012 and confirmed as directors at a special meeting of the shareholders of LATAM held on September 4, 2012 in which the entire LATAM Airlines Group board of directors was reelected or replaced. Mr. Maurício Rolim Amaro was appointed chairman of LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors for the first two years following such shareholders’ meeting. If Mr. Amaro vacates this position for any reason within that two-year period, TEP Chile has the right to select a replacement to complete his term. Thereafter, LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors will appoint any of its members as the chairman of LATAM Airlines Group’s board of directors, from time to time, in accordance with LATAM Airlines Group’s by-laws.

Management of the LATAM Group

As of June 2012, Enrique Cueto Plaza became the CEO of LATAM or the (“CEO LATAM”). The CEO LATAM is the highest ranked officer of the LATAM Airlines Group and reports directly to the LATAM board of directors. The CEO LATAM is charged with the general supervision, direction and control of the business of the LATAM Airlines Group and certain other responsibilities set forth in the LATAM Airlines Group-TEP shareholders agreement. After any departure of the current CEO LATAM, our board of directors will select his or her successor after receiving the recommendation of the Leadership Committee.

As of June 2012, Ignacio Cueto Plaza became the CEO of LAN, or the “CEO LAN.” The CEO LAN reports directly to the CEO LATAM and has general supervision, direction and control of the passenger and cargo operations of the LATAM Group, excluding those conducted by Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries, and the international passenger business of the LATAM Group. The CEO LAN, together with Marco Antonia Bologna, the current the CEO TAM, are responsible for recommending a candidate to the CEO LATAM to serve as the head of the international passenger business of the LATAM Group (including both long haul and regional operations), who shall report jointly to the CEO LAN and the CEO TAM. The key executives of the LATAM Group (other than the CEO LATAM and those in the TAM Group) will be appointed by, and will report, directly or indirectly, to the CEO LATAM.

The head office of the LATAM Airlines Group continues to be located in Santiago, Chile.

Governance and Management of Holdco I and TAM

We refer to the shareholders agreement between us, Holdco I and TEP Chile, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of Holdco I, and voting and transfer of voting shares of Holdco I, as the “Holdco I shareholders agreement” and to the shareholders agreement between us, Holdco I, TAM and TEP Chile, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of TAM and its subsidiaries following the effective time as the “TAM shareholders agreement.” The Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement set forth the parties’ agreement on the governance and management of Holdco I, TAM and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “TAM Group”) following the business combination of LAN and TAM.

This section describes the key provisions of the Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement. The rights and obligations of the parties to the Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement are governed by the express terms and conditions of the aforementioned shareholders agreements and not by this summary or any other information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F. The description of these Holdco I shareholders agreement and the TAM shareholders agreement summarized below and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the aforementioned shareholders agreements, which are incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F. For a full understanding of these agreements, we advise you to read these agreements carefully and in their entirety.

Composition of the Holdco I and TAM Boards

The Holdco I shareholders agreement and TAM shareholders agreement generally provide for identical boards of directors and the same chief executive officer at Holdco I and TAM, with LATAM appointing two directors and TEP Chile appointing four directors (including the chairman of the board of directors). From September 2012 to September 2014, the chairman of the Holdco I and TAM boards of directors will be Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro.

The control group shareholders agreement provides that the persons elected by or on behalf of the LATAM controlling shareholders or the TAM controlling shareholders to our board of directors must also serve on the boards of directors of both Holdco I and TAM.

Management of Holdco I and TAM

The day-to-day business and affairs of Holdco I will be managed by the TAM Group CEO under the oversight of the board of directors of Holdco I. The day-to-day business and affairs of TAM will be managed by theTAM Diretoria under the oversight of the board of directors of TAM. The “TAM Diretoria” will be comprised of the TAM Group CEO, the TAM CFO, the TAM COO and the TAM CCO. Marco Bologna, currently the CEO of TAM, will be the initial CEO of Holdco I and TAM, or the “TAM Group CEO” and any successor CEO will be selected by us from three candidates proposed by TEP Chile. The TAM Group CEO will have general supervision, direction and control of the business and operations of the TAM Group (other than the international passenger business of the LATAM Group) and will carry out all orders and resolutions of the board of directors of TAM. The initial chief financial officer of TAM, or the “TAM CFO,” has been jointly selected by us and TEP Chile and any successor CFO will be selected by TEP Chile from three candidates proposed by us. The chief operating officer of TAM, or the “TAM COO,” and chief commercial officer of TAM, or the “TAM CCO,” will be jointly selected and recommended to the TAM board of directors by the TAM Group CEO and TAM CFO and approved by the TAM board of directors. These shareholders agreements also regulate the composition of the boards of directors of subsidiaries of TAM.

Following the combination, TAM continues to be headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil.

Supermajority Actions requiring

Certain actions by Holdco I or TAM require supermajority approval by the board of directors or the shareholders of Holdco I or TAM which effectively require the approval of both LATAM and TEP Chile before the specified actions can be taken. Actions that require supermajority approval of the Holdco I board of directors or the TAM board of directors include, among others, enteringas applicable:

to approve the annual budget and business plan and the multi-year business (which we refer to collectively as the “approved plans”), as well as any amendments to these plans;

to take or agree to take any action which causes, or will reasonably cause, individually, or in the aggregate, any capital, operating or other expense of any TAM Company and its subsidiaries to be greater than (i) the lesser of 1% of revenue or 10% of profit under the approved plans, with respect to actions affecting the profit and loss statement, or (ii) the lesser of 2% of assets or 10% of cash and cash equivalents (as defined by IFRS) as set forth in the approved plan then in effect , with respect to actions affecting the cash flow statement;

to create, dispose of or admit new shareholders to any subsidiary of the relevant company, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to approve the acquisition, disposal, modification or encumbrance by any TAM company of any asset greater than $15 million or of any equity securities or securities convertible into acquisitionsequity securities of any TAM Company or other company, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to approve any investment in assets not related to the corporate purpose of any TAM company, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to enter into any agreement in an amount greater than $15 million, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to enter into any agreement related to profit sharing, joint ventures, business collaborations, amending or approving budgets,alliance memberships, code sharing arrangements, except as approved by the business plans financial statements and accounting policies, incurring indebtedness, encumbering assets, entering into certain agreements, making certain investments, modifyingbudget then in effect, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to terminate, modify or waive any rights or claims entering into settlements, appointingof a relevant company or its subsidiaries under any arrangement in any amount greater than $15 million, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to commence, participate in, compromise or settle any material action with respect to any litigation or proceeding in an amount greater than $15 million, relating to the relevant company, except to the extent expressly permitted in the approved plans;

to approve the execution, amendment, termination or ratification of agreements with related parties, except to the extent expressly contemplated in the approved plans;

to approve any financial statements, amendments, or to any accounting, dividend or tax policy of the relevant company;

to approve the grant of any security interest or guarantee to secure obligations of third parties;

to appoint executives creating security interests, issuing, redeemingother than the Holdco I CEO or repurchasing securitiesthe TAM Diretoria or to re-elect the then current TAM CEO or TAM CFO; and voting on matters

to approve any vote to be cast by the relevant company or its subsidiaries in its capacity as a shareholder of subsidiaries of TAM. shareholder.

Actions requiring supermajority shareholder approval include:

to approve any amendments to the by-laws of any relevant company or its subsidiaries in respect to the following matters: (i) corporate purpose, (ii) corporate capital; (iii) the rights inherent to each class of shares and its shareholders; (iv) the attributions of shareholder regular meetings or limitations to attributions of the board of directors; (v) changes in the number of directors or officers; (vi) the term; (vii) the change in the corporate headquarters of a relevant company; (viii) the composition, attributions and liabilities of management of any relevant company; and (ix) dividends and other distributions;

to approve the dissolution, liquidation, winding up of a relevant company;

to approve the transformation, merger, spin-up or any kind of corporate re-organization of a relevant company;

to pay or distribute dividends or any other kind of distribution to the shareholders;

to approve the issuance, redemption or amortization of any debt securities, equity securities or convertible securities;

to approve a plan or the disposal by sale, encumbrance or otherwise of 50% or more of the assets, as determined by the balance sheet of the previous year, of Holdco I;

to approve the disposal by sale, encumbrance of otherwise of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary of Holdco I representing at least 20% of Holdco I or TAM include, among others, certain changesto approve the sale, encumbrance or disposition of equity securities such that Holdco I loses control;

to approve the grant of any security interest or guarantee to secure obligations in excess of 50% of the assets of the relevant company; and

to approve the execution, amendment, termination or ratification of acts or agreement with related parties but only if applicable law requires approval of such matters.

Voting Agreements, Transfers and Other Arrangements

Voting Agreements

The LATAM controlling shareholders and TEP Chile have agreed in the control group shareholders agreement to vote their respective LATAM Airlines Group common shares as follows:

until such time as TEP Chile sells any of its LAN common shares (other than the exempted shares as defined below held by TEP Chile), the LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders will vote their LATAM Airlines Group common shares to elect to the by-lawsLATAM Airlines Group board of directors any individual designated by TEP Chile unless TEP Chile beneficially owns enough LATAM Airlines Group common shares to directly elect two directors to the LATAM Airlines Group board of directors;

the parties agree to vote their LATAM Airlines Group common shares to assist the other parties in removing and replacing the directors such other parties elected to the LATAM Airlines Group board of directors;

the parties agree to consult with one another and use their good faith efforts to reach an agreement and act jointly on all actions (other than actions requiring supermajority approval under Chilean law) to be taken by the LATAM Airlines Group board of directors or the LATAM Airlines Group shareholders;

the parties agree to maintain the size of the LATAM Airlines Group board of directors at a total of nine directors and to maintain the quorum required for action by the LATAM Airlines Group board of directors at a majority of the total number of directors of the LATAM Airlines Group board of directors; and

if, after good faith efforts to reach an agreement with respect to any action that requires supermajority approval under Chilean law and a mediation period, the parties do not reach such an agreement then TEP Chile has agreed to vote its shares on such supermajority matter as directed by the LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders, which we refer to as a “directed vote.”

The number of “exempted shares” of TEP Chile means that number of LATAM Airlines Group common shares which TEP Chile owns immediately after the effective time in excess of 12.5% of the outstanding LATAM Airlines Group common shares at such time as determined on a fully diluted basis.

The parties to the Holdco I shareholders agreement and TAM shareholders agreement have agreed to vote their voting shares of Holdco I and shares of TAM so as to give effect to the agreements with respect to representation on the TAM board of directors discussed above.

Transfer Restrictions

Pursuant to the control group shareholders agreement, the LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders and TEP Chile are subject to certain restrictions on sales, transfers and pledges of the LATAM Airlines Group common shares and (in the case of TEP Chile only) the voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by them. Except for a limited amount of LATAM Airlines Group common shares, neither the LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders nor TEP Chile may sell any of its LATAM Airlines Group common shares, and TEP Chile may not sell

its voting shares of Holdco I, until June 2015. Thereafter, sales of LATAM Airlines Group common shares by either party are permitted, subject to (i) certain limitations on the volume and frequency of such sales and (ii) in the case of TEP Chile only, TEP Chile satisfying certain minimum ownership requirements. After June 2022, TEP Chile may sell all of its LATAM Airlines Group common shares and voting shares of Holdco I as a block, subject to (x) approval of the transferee by the LATAM board of directors, (y) the condition that the sale not have an adverse effect and (z) a right of first offer in favor of the LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders, which we refer to collectively as “block sale provisions.” An “adverse effect” is defined in the control group shareholders agreement to mean a material adverse effect on our and Holdco I’s ability to own or receive the full benefits of ownership of TAM and its subsidiaries or the ability of TAM and its subsidiaries to operate their airline businesses worldwide. The LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders have agreed to transfer any voting shares of Holdco I acquired pursuant to such right of first offer to us for the same consideration paid for such shares.

In addition, TEP Chile may sell all LATAM Airlines Group common shares and voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by it as a block, subject to satisfaction of the block sale provisions, after June 2015 if a release event (as described below) occurs or if TEP Chile is required to make two or more directed votes during any 24-month period at two meetings (consecutive or not) of the shareholders of LATAM Airlines Group held at least 12 months apart and LATAM Airlines Group has not yet fully exercised its conversion option described below. A “release event” will occur if (i) a capital increase of LATAM Airlines Group occurs, (ii) TEP Chile does not fully exercise the preemptive rights granted to it under applicable law in Chile with respect to such capital increase in respect of all of its restricted LATAM Airlines Group common shares, and (iii) after such capital increase is completed, the individual designated by TEP Chile for election to the board of directors of LATAM Airlines Group with the assistance of the LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders is not elected to the board of directors of LATAM Airlines Group.

In addition, after June 2022 and after the occurrence of the full ownership trigger date (as described below under the “—Conversion Option” section), TEP Chile may sell all or any portion of its LATAM Airlines Group common shares, subject to (x) a right of first offer in favor of the LATAM Airlines Group controlling shareholders and (y) the restrictions on sales of LATAM Airlines Group common shares more than once in a 12-month period.

The control group shareholders agreement provides certain exceptions to these restrictions on transfer for certain pledges of LATAM Airlines Group common shares made by the parties and for transfers to affiliates, in each case under certain limited circumstances.

In addition, TEP Chile agreed in the Holdco I shareholders agreement not to vote its voting shares of Holdco I, or to take any other action, in support of any transfer by Holdco I of any equity securities or convertible securities issued by it or by any of TAM or its subsidiaries without our prior written consent.

Restriction on transfer of TAM shares

We agreed in the Holdco I shareholders agreement not to sell or transfer any shares of TAM stock to any person (other than our affiliates) at any time when TEP Chile owns any voting shares of Holdco I. However, we will have the right to effect such a sale or transfer if, at the same time as such sale or transfer, we (or our assignee) acquires all the voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by TEP Chile for an amount equal to TEP Chile’s then current tax basis in such shares and any costs TEP Chile is required to incur to effect such sale or transfer. TEP Chile has irrevocably granted us the assignable right to purchase all of the voting shares of Holdco I beneficially owned by TEP Chile in connection with any such sale.

Conversion Option

Pursuant to the control group shareholders agreement and the Holdco I shareholders agreement, we have the unilateral right to convert our shares of non-voting stock of Holdco I into shares of voting stock of Holdco I to the maximum extent allowed under law and to increase our representation on the TAM and Holdco I boards of directors if and when permitted in accordance with foreign ownership control laws in Brazil and other applicable laws if the conversion would not have an adverse effect (as defined above under the “—Transfer Restrictions” section).

On or after June 2022, and after we have fully converted all of our shares of non-voting stock of Holdco I into shares of voting stock of Holdco I as permitted by Brazilian law and other applicable laws, we will have the right to purchase all of the voting shares of Holdco I held by the controlling shareholders of TAM for an amount equal to their then current tax basis in such shares and any costs incurred by them to effect such sale, which amount we refer to as the “sale consideration.” If we do not timely exercise our right to purchase these shares or if, after June 2022, we have the right under applicable law in Brazil and other applicable law to fully convert all the shares of non-voting stock of Holdco I beneficially owned by us into shares of voting stock of Holdco I and such conversion would not have an adverse effect but we have not fully exercised such right within a specified period, then the controlling shareholders of TAM will have the right to put their shares of voting stock of Holdco I to us for an amount equal to the sale consideration.

Acquisitions of TAM Stock

The parties have agreed that all acquisitions of TAM common shares by LATAM Airlines Group, Holdco I, TAM or TAM’sany of their respective subsidiaries or any dissolution/liquidation, corporate reorganization, payment of dividends, issuance of securities, disposal or encumbrance of certain assets, creation of securities interest or entering into guaranteesfrom and agreements with related parties. Please see “Item 4.—Informationafter the effective time of the Company—The Transaction Agreements—Shareholders Agreements” for more information.business combination will be made by Holdco I.

B. Related Party Transactions

General

We have engaged in a variety of transactions with our affiliates, including entities owned or controlled by certain of our controlling shareholders. In the ordinary course of our business we render to and receive from related companies services of various types, including aircraft leases, aircraft interchanges, freight transportation and reservation services.

It is our policy not to engage in any transaction with or for the benefit of any shareholder or member of the board of directors, or any entity controlled by such a person or in which such a person has a substantial economic interest, unless the transaction is related to our business and the price and other terms are at least as favorable to us as those that could be obtained on an arm’s-length basis from a third party, suchparty. Such transactions, none of which is individually material, are summarized in Note 35 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.2012.

Sale of Blue Expressthe “Sitio LAN.

On January 25, 2011 Lan Cargo S.A. and Inversiones LanMay 29, 2012 the Board of Directors of InmobiliariaAeronautica S.A., subsidiariesa subsidiary of LANLATAM Airlines signed a promiseGroup, agreed to sell in favor of Bethiathe real state located at AvenidaPresidente Riesco 5537, Las Condes, Santiago, through a public auction. Such process finished on July 18, 2012 and the property was awarded to Sinergia Inmobiliaria S.A. (“Bethia”) 100% of the capital in the LAN subsidiaries Blue Express Intl. Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Blue Express S.A. (together referred to as “Blue Express”), companies engaged in ground courier services, operating brands and certain computer programs. The price stated inamount of UF 646,261 (approximately US$ 31,342,987.76 converted at the promissory contract was US$54 million subject to any adjustments that might arise as a result of a due diligence to be conducted by Bethia.

exchange rate on April 15, 2013). On April 6, 2011, LAN Cargo S.A. and Inversiones LAN S.A, as sellers, and Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Inversiones Betmin SpA (subsidiary of Bethia S.A.), as buyer, executed: (i) an Assignment of Social Rights; and (ii) a ShareJuly 31, 2012 the Purchase Agreement for the transfer of 100% of the capital in the LAN subsidiaries Blue Express Intl. Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Blue Express S.A., respectively. The final sale value of Blue Express was US$53.5 million.executed.

BethiaSinergiaInmobiliaria S.A. is a related party to LANLATAM Airlines Group under the terms of article 100 (c) of the Securities Market Law as Juan José Cueto, member of LATAM Airlines Group´s Board of Directors, is also member of the Board of Directors of SinergiaInmobiliaria S.A.

Sale of the Blue Express facilities.

On September 28, 2012 the Board of Directors of InmobiliariaAeronautica S.A., a subsidiary of LATAM Airlines Group, agreed to sell the real state located at Avenida Circunvalación Américo Vespucio 1401, Quilicura, Santiago to Sotraser S.A., a subsidiary of Bethia S.A., in the amount of UF 301,000 (approximately US$ 14,598,187.60 converted at the exchange rate on April 15, 2013). On December 28, 2012 the respective Purchase Agreement was executed.

Sotraser S.A. is a related party to LATAM Airlines Group under the terms of article 100 (c) of the Securities Market Law 18,045, as it is controlled by Bethia S.A. which is controlled by Mr. Carlos Heller, member of LAN’sLATAM Airlines Group’s Board of Directors.

 

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information

See “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data”,Data,” “Item 18. Financial Statements” and pages F-1 through F-129].F-194.

Legal and Arbitration Proceedings

We are involved in routine litigation and other proceedings relating to the ordinary course of our business.

In February 2006 the EC, in conjunction with the DOJ, initiated a global investigation of a large number of international cargo airlines (among them LanLAN Cargo, LAN’s cargo subsidiary) for possible price fixing of cargo fuel surcharges and other fees in the European and United States air cargo markets. On December 26, 2007, the European competition authorities notified LanLAN Cargo and LAN of the initiation of proceedings against twenty-five cargo airlines, among them LanLAN Cargo, for allegations of anti-competitive behavior in the airfreight business.

On January 21, 2009, LanLAN Cargo announced that it had reached a plea agreement with the DOJ in relation to the DOJ’s ongoing investigation regarding price fixing of fuel surcharges and other fees for cargo shipments. Under the plea agreement, LanLAN Cargo agreed to pay a fine of US$88 million. In addition, ABSA also reached a plea agreement with the DOJ and agreed to pay a fine of US$21 million. These amounts were stipulated to be paid over a five-year payment schedule starting in 2009. As of December 31, 2011,2012, the pending amount to be paid during the next threetwo years is approximately US$5421.6 million and has been recorded within “Other Accounts Payable.”

On November 9, 2010 the EC imposed fines to 11 air carriers for a total amount of €800 million (equivalent to approximately US$1.1 billion). The fine imposed against LanLAN Cargo and its parent company, LAN, Airlines, totaled €8.2 million (equivalent to approximately US$11.0 million). The Company provisioned US$25 million during the fourth quarter of 2007 for such fines, and maintained this provision until the fine was imposed in 2010. This was the lowest fine applied by the European Commission, which includes a significant reduction due to the Company’s cooperation with the Commission during the course of the investigation. In accordance with European Union law, on January 24, 2011 this administrative decision was appealed by LanLAN Cargo and Lan AirlinesLAN to the General Court in Luxembourg. The appeal is still ongoing. Any judgment by the General Court may also be appealed to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

As of December 31, 2010 the Company recorded a US$14.1 million gain (pre-tax) due to the reversal of a portion of the provision related to the investigation in the cargo business carried out by the European Commission. This was as a result of the fine announced in November 2010, which was lower than the amount provided for. This reversal is recorded in Other gains/(losses).

The investigation by the DOJ prompted the filing of numerous civil class actions by freight forwarding and shipping companies against many airlines, including LanLAN Cargo and Lan Airlines,LAN, including fifty-four in the United States. The cases filed in the United States were consolidated in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York and the original complaint was subsequently amended to include additional airlines, including ABSA. On May 11, 2011, LanLAN Cargo announced that it had reached a settlement agreement with the class action plaintiffs in

relation to this litigation. As per the settlement agreement, LanLAN Cargo agreed to pay US$59.7 million. In addition, ABSA also reached a settlement agreement with class action plaintiffs and agreed to pay US$6.3 million. The amounts were paid to the plaintiffs’ counsel escrow account in 2011.

In February 2006, the CCB, in conjunction with the DOJ, initiated a global investigation of a large number of international cargo airlines (among them LanLAN Cargo) for possible price fixing of cargo fuel surcharges and other fees in the Canadian air cargo markets. Given the current stage of the proceeding, it is not possible at this time to anticipate with any precision the outcome of the investigation. The CCB’s investigation prompted the filing of four separate civil class actions by freight forwarding and shipping companies against many airlines, including LanLAN Cargo and Lan AirlinesLAN in Canada. On January 31, 2012, the respective Board of Directors of Lan AirlinesLAN and LanLAN Cargo approved a settlement agreement with the class actions plaintiffs. As per the settlement agreement, Lan AirlinesLAN and LanLAN Cargo agreed to pay the amount of CAD$700,000 (approximately US$701,192682,324 as of March 28, 2012)April 24, 2013). The settlement agreement and payment are pending court approval.

On April 5, 2008, Brazilian authorities notified ABSA of the initiation of administrative proceedings before theConselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (the Brazilian Antitrust Authority) against several cargo airlines and airline officers, among them ABSA, for allegations of anticompetitive practices regarding fuel surcharges in the air cargo business. Given the current stage of the proceedings, it is not possible at this time to anticipate with any precision the outcome of the civil actions filed against LanLAN Cargo, although it is expected to be a lengthy process.

In June 2008, the Korean Fair Trade Commission notified LAN of an investigation into the air cargo industry and its non-compliance with the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act and has requested information and documentation from LAN, which LAN duly submitted. On May 26, 2010 the Korean Fair Trade Commission announced the imposition of penalties against 29 other airlines and excluded LAN from further investigation.

The New Zealand Commerce Commission also initiated an investigation into potential anti-competitive activities in the international air cargo markets and requested information and documentation from LAN, which LAN duly submitted. On December 15, 2008, the New Zealand Commerce Commission announced it would focus its investigation on ten airlines and excluded LAN from further investigation.

In January 2007, we announced that we had provided, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC (“AAI”), a total of US$17.1 million in financing to Brazilian company VRG LINHAS AEREAS S.A. (“New Varig”), convertible into shares of New Varig. On March 28, 2007, GOL announced that it was acquiring 100% of the equity participation in New Varig. Pursuant to the terms of the relevant loan agreements, upon the sale of New Varig to GOL, we sought repayment of the principal of the loans plus interest from Varig LogíVarigLogística S.A. (“VarigLog”), the parent company of New Varig. VarigLog failed to respond to our demands for repayment and we subsequently filed a lawsuit in New York State court on August 29, 2007, seeking repayment of the outstanding principal plus interest. On October 10, 2008, the Court granted summary judgment in our favor for the full principal amount of the loans, US$17.1 million and entered a final judgment on December 1, 2008. The Court also held that AAI was entitled to collect the interest due under the loan agreement along with reasonable attorneys’ fees. After a hearing, a special referee appointed by the Court to decide the issue recommended that AAI recover US$1.9 million in accrued interest and attorneys’ fees, and the Court approved that recommendation. VarigLog appealed that decision, and the decision was upheld. On March 3, 2009, VarigLog filed an insolvency proceeding (recuperação judicial) before the bankruptcy court in Brazil, and on March 31, 2009, VarigLog filed a Chapter 15 petition in bankruptcy court in Florida seeking recognition of its Brazilian filing. The Florida court has entered an order, based upon AAI’s stipulation with VarigLog pursuant to which there would be no stay against the continuation and commencement of legal actions by AAI against VarigLog and any of its affiliates but AAI would not be able to take any action against two discrete VarigLog assets located in the United States. AAI continues its enforcement efforts to recover the amounts owed to it by VarigLog under the loan agreements.

In July 2009, as a result of VarigLog’s continued failure to repay the amount owed to AAI, we instituted a second lawsuit in New York State court against MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLC, MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities Partners II LP, MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities Partners (Cayman) II LP and Volo Logistics LLC (collectively, the “MP Entities”), seeking to hold them liable as thealter egos of VarigLog and asserting separate contract-based claims related to AAI’s loans to VarigLog. If AAI succeeds inIn itsalter ego claim, AAI asserted that the MP Entities wouldshould be held liable for VarigLog’s debts, and obligated to repay what VarigLog has been adjudged to owe AAI by the

prior decisions of the New York courts. TheIn April 2010, the Court denied in large part the MP EntitiesEntities’ motion to dismiss AAI’s complaint on April 23, 2010.complaint. Thereafter, the MP Entities answered AAI’s complaint, and Volo Logistics LLC (“Volo”) filed counter-claims against AAI and its direct and indirect parents, LAN Pax Group S.A. (“LAX Pax”) and LAN, Airlines S.A. (“LAN Airlines”), seeking declaratory relief and damages for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract. AAI and LAN Airlines moved to dismiss all of the counterclaims. AAI also moved for summary judgment on one of its breach of contract claims in September 2010. In May 2011, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of AAI as to the MP Entities’ liability of MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities Partners II LP, MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities (Cayman) II LP and Volo (collectively, the “MP Fund Entities”) for breach of contract. In the same decision, the Court dismissed the majority of the MP Entities’Volo’s counterclaims. The MP Entities have separately appealed both the Court’s decision granting AAI summary judgment and the decision to dismiss the majority of Volo’s counterclaims. In June 2011, AAI also moved for summary judgment against the MP Fund Entities to establish the amount of damages owed as a result of the Court’s granting of AAI’s motion for summary judgment on liability. In July 2011, the Appellate Court stayed the proceedings on AAI’s motion for summary judgment on damages pending the MP Entities’ counterclaims.appeal with respect to liability. As a condition of the stay, the MP Fund Entities were required to post an undertaking in the amount of $17 million, the full amount of which was guaranteed by Weston Surety Company. In February 2012, the Appellate Court unanimously affirmed the lower Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of AAI on the issue of liability. The MP Entities are seeking permission fromFund Entities’ motion for leave to appeal to New York’s highest court was also denied, thereby exhausting their last appeal with respect to the Court to further appeal that decision. If the Appellate Court's affirmance of the lower Court's grant of summary judgment on liability. In June 2012, AAI and the MP Fund Entities completed the remaining briefing on AAI’s motion for summary judgment on damages. In July 2012, the Court entered a stipulation between the parties lifting the stay on proceedings imposed by the Appellate Court and allowing the damages phase of the litigation to proceed. The Court has yet to set a date for oral argument on AAI’s motion for summary judgment on damages.

Legal proceedings involving TAM

TAM Linhas Aéreas is undisturbed, AAIparty to 3 actions filed by relatives of victims of an accident that occurred in October 1996 involving one of its Fokker 100 aircraft which crashed during departure, in addition to 27 actions filed by residents of the region of where the accident occurred, who are claiming pain and suffering, and a class action related to this crash. Any damages resulting from the aforementioned legal claims are covered by the civil liability guarantee provided for in TAM’s insurance policy with ItaúUnibancoSeguros S.A. We believe that the cap of U.S.$ 400 million in that insurance policy is sufficient to cover any potential penalties and judicial or extrajudicial agreements arising as a result of this matter.

Insurance coverage has been sufficient to cover the liabilities arising from an accident that occurred in July 2007 involving an Airbus A320 aircraft from TAM Linhas Aereas. Settlements have been made directly between the insurance company and the victims’ families. As of December 31, 2012, approximately 196 settlements have occurred and others are under negotiation between the insurance company and victims’ families. Management believes that the insurance coverage is adequate and that TAM will resumenot incur any expenses that were not contemplated by the scope of the insurance policy that would result in TAM’s obligation to pay damages.

TAM Linhas Aereas challenged the constitutionality of a change in the tax basis of the PIS and the increase in the contribution and basis calculation of COFINS, introduced under Law No. 9.718/98. On November 9, 2005, the Brazilian Supreme Court of Justice ruled that the change in the tax basis of the PIS was unconstitutional. During 2006, TAM Linhas Aereas was successful in obtaining one favorable ruling which enabled TAM to partially reverse a tax assessment of R$46. In November 2009, Brazil established the Fiscal Recovery Program (“REFIS”) to refund amounts previously required under Law No. 9.718/98. TAM Linhas Aéreas has applied to REFIS to settle its outstanding tax assessments relating to Law No. 9.718/98.

Proceedings had been filed against TAM LinhasAéreas concerning the alleged failure to pay ICMS due on imported aircraft, parts and engines. In response, TAM had filed the appropriate challenges on the basis that ICMS should not be payable on leased aircraft. On May 30, 2007, theSupremo Tribunal Federal (Federal Supreme Court) ruled in TAM’s favor in respect of one of these cases. On the basis of this precedent decision and of recent rulings of the Superior Tribunal of Justice, we believe our chance of loss in respect of the other pending cases is remote. We had not established any provisions for the amounts in question.

TAM Linhas Aereas filed an ordinary action with a request for injunctive relief for non-payment of the Airline Workers Fund, a tax charged monthly at the rate of 2.5% of an airline’s total payroll. Payment of the tax credit is suspended by virtue of the injunctive relief granted in TAM’s favor. Currently, judgment is pending on an appeal that TAM lodged challenging the initial decision (which was ruled in favor of the INSS). In 2004 and 2011, the INSS issued an assessment notice tolling the Statute of Limitations of the social security credit as a result of TAM Linhas Aereas’ non-payment of the Airline Workers Fund. The administrative proceedings beforehave been suspended until completion of the lower Court to fixjudicial process. The approximate adjusted value of this proceeding as of December 31, 2012 was R$ 271 million. In the opinion of our legal advisors, chance of losing in this proceeding is possible. Assuming payment of this tax is required by law, we have established a provision in the amount of R$271 million pending the final outcome of the matter.

TAM Linhas Aereas is a plaintiff in an action filed against the Brazilian government in 1993 seeking damages for the MP Entities owe AAI.break-up of an air transport concession agreement that resulted in the freezing of TAM’s prices from 1988 to September 1993 in order to maintain operations with the prices set by the Brazilian government during that period. The process is currently being heard before the Federal Regional Court and judgment is pending an appeal by TAM requesting clarification of the initial decision.The estimated value of the action is R$245 million, based on a calculation made by an expert witness of the court. This sum is subject to delinquent interest since September 1993 and inflation adjustment since November 1994. Based on the opinion of TAM’s legal advisors, and recent rulings handed down by the Brazilian Supreme Court of Justice in favor of airlines in similar cases (specifically, actions filed by Transbrasil and Varig), we believe that TAM’s likelihood of success is probable. We have not recognized these credits in our financial statements and will only do so if and when the aforementioned decision is final.

TAM Linhas Aereas filed an ordinary claim, with a request for early judgment, in relation to a dispute concerning the legality of charging theAdicional das TarifasAeroportuárias (“Additional Airport Tariffs,” or “ATAERO”), which are charged at a rate of 50% on the value of tariffs and airport tariffs. The total amount involved, adjusted for inflation, as of December 31, 2012 totaled R$1,146 million.

In addition, one administrative proceeding had been filed against TAM Linhas Aéreas concerning the alleged failure to pay an Industrialized Products Tax (“IPI”) and Import Tax (“II”) due on imported aircraft. In response, we filed the appropriate challenges on the basis that no federal tax should be payable on the imported aircraft because it is leased aircraft. The total amount involved in this administrative proceeding is R$770 million. In April 2013, the Conselho Administrativo de Recursos Fiscais (“CARF”) ruled the case in our favor and definitively released the Company from paying the initial debt.

Dividend Policy

In accordance with the Chilean Corporation Law, Lan AirlinesLATAM must distribute cash dividends equal to at least 30% of its annual consolidated net income calculated in accordance with IFRS, unless otherwise decided by a unanimous vote of the holders of all issued shares and unless and except to the extent it has accumulated losses. If there is no net income in a given year, Lan AirlinesLATAM can elect but is not legally obligated to distribute dividends out of retained earnings. The board of directors may declare interim dividends out of profits earned during such interim period. Pursuant to Lan Airlines’LATAM’s by-laws, the annual cash dividend is approved by the shareholders at the annual ordinary shareholders’ meeting held between February 1 and April 30 of the year following the year with respect to which the dividend is proposed. All outstanding common shares are entitled to share equally in all dividends declared by Lan Airlines,LATAM, unless the shares have not been fully paid by the shareholder after being subscribed.

Holders of ADSs will be entitled to receive dividends on the underlying common shares to the same extent as holders of common shares. Holders of ADRs on the applicable record dates will be entitled to receive dividends paid on the common shares represented by the ADSs evidenced by such ADRs. Dividends payable to holders of ADSs will be paid by us to the depositary in Chilean pesos and remitted by the depositary to such holders net of foreign currency conversion fees and expenses of the depositary and will be subject to Chilean withholding tax currently imposed at a rate of 35% (subject to credits in certain cases as described under “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Cash Dividends and Other Distributions”). Owners of the ADSs will not be charged any dividend remittance fee by the depositary with respect to cash dividends.

Chilean law requires that holders of shares of Chilean companies that are not residents of Chile register as foreign investors under one of the foreign investment regimes established by Chilean law in order to have dividends, sale proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares remitted outside Chile through the Formal Exchange Market (Mercado Cambiario Formal). Under our Foreign Investment Contract, the depositary, on behalf of ADS holders, will be granted access to the Formal Exchange Market to convert cash dividends from pesos to U.S. dollars and to pay such U.S. dollars to ADS holders outside Chile.

B. Significant Changes

None.

ITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING

A. Offer and Listing Details

The principal trading market for our common shares is the SEE.SSE. The common shares have been listed on the SEESSE under the symbol “LAN” since 1989, and the ADSs have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “LFL” since November 7, 1997. The common shares also trade on theBolsa de Valores de Valparaísoand theBolsa Electrónica de Chile. On June 22nd the common shares additionally started to be traded on the Brazilian Stock Exchange (“Bovespa”) under the symbol LATM11. The outstanding ADSs are identified by the CUSIP number 501723100. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices on the SEESSE for the common shares and the high and low closing prices on the NYSE for the common shares represented by ADSs. The information set forth in the table below reflects actual historical amounts and has not been restated in constant Chilean pesos.

Period

  Ch$ per Common Share   US$ per ADS 
  Low   High   Low   High 

2007(1)

   5,839.90     8,997.00     13.03     84.15  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2008

   4,350.00     7,110.00     6.90     14.87  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2009

   7,798.10     8,664.30     15.77     16.90  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2010

        

Quarters:

        

First Quarter

   8,120.00     9,470.00     15.60     18.36  

Second Quarter

   9,200.00     10,550.00     16.65     20.00  

Third Quarter

   10,000.00     15,900.00     18.74     30.50  

Fourth Quarter

   14,200.00     15,600.00     29.07     32.68  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Annual:

        

Annual 2010

   14,790.00     15,600.00     30.79     32.68  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2011

        

Quarters:

        

First

   11,755.00     15,150.00     24.30     31.39  

Second

   9,200.00     10,550.00     25.15     29.57  

Third

   10,000.00     15,900.00     20.56     31.91  

Fourth

   14,200.00     15,600.00     18.65     25.98  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Months:

        

September 2011

   10,960,00     13,600.00     20.56     29.45  

October 2011

   14,200.00     15,238.00     18.65     25.98  

November 2011

   15,600.00     14,500.00     21.45     25.34  

December 2011

   11,970.00     12,490.00     22.83     24.49  

Annual:

        

Annual 2011

   14,790.00     15,600.00     18.65     31.91  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2012

        

Months:

        

January 2012

   13,250.00     15,150.00     23.18     25.34  

February 2012

   12,000.00     14,730.00     25.13     27.92  

March 2012 (through March 28, 2012)

   12,948.00     14,300.00     26.25     29.34  

 

Period

  Ch$ per Common Share   US$ per ADS   R$ per BDR 
  Low   High   Low   High   Low   High 

2008

   4,350.00     7,110.00     6.90     14.87      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2009

   7,798.10     8,664.30     15.77     16.90      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2010

   14,790.00     15,600.0     30.79     32.68      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

2011

          

Quarters:

          

First

   11,755.00     15,150.0     24.30     31.39      

Second

   9,200.00     10,550.0     25.15     29.57      

Third

   10,000.00     15,900.0     20.56     31.91      

Fourth

   14,200.00     15,600.0     18.65     25.98      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Annual:

          

Annual 2011

   14,790.00     15,600.0     18.65     31.91      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2012

          

Quarters:

          

First

   11,918.1     14,360.7     23.28     29.40      

Second(*)

   11,833.1     14,290.7     23.47     29.39     52.40     53.35  

Third

   11,084.2     12,939.9     22.73     26.10     45.50     52.30  

Fourth

   10,577.3     12,393.0     22.10     26.10     45.33     52.01  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Months:

          

September

   11,148.2     12,120.1     23.09     25.91     46.02     51.50  

October

   11,782.1     12,393.0     24.58     26.10     46.03     52.01  

November

   10,593.3     11,907.1     22.10     24.89     45.50     50.99  

December

   10,577.3     11,260.0     22.18     23.56     45.33     48.21  

Annual:

          

Annual 2012

   10,577.3     14,360.7     22.10     29.40     45.33     53.35  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2013

          

Months:

          

January

   11,293.0     11,863.0     23.44     25.08     45.01     49.52  

February

   11,135.0     11,648.0     23.41     24.64     45.05     47.01  

March (as of March 12, 2013)

   11,116.0     11,365.0     23.57     23.85     45.05     46.25  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Source: Santiago Stock Exchange, and the New York Stock Exchange and the Bovespa

 

(1)(*)

In August 2007,From June 22, 2012, following the ADRcombination of LAN and TAM, the trading stock continues to common share ratio was changed from 5:1 to 1:1.

be listed as “LFL” on the NYSE and as “LAN” on the SSE, but reflects the value of the combined operating entity, LATAM Airlines Group.

As of February 29, 2012,March 30, 2013, a total of 340,737,649483.6 million common shares were outstanding, including 10,283,898 common shares represented by ADSs.

B. Plan of Distribution

Not applicable.

C. Markets

Trading

Chile

The Chilean stock market, which is regulated by the SVS under Law 18,045 of October 22, 1981, as amended, which we refer to as the Securities Market Law, is one of the most developed among emerging markets, reflecting the particular economic history and development of Chile. The Chilean government’s policy of privatizing state-owned companies, implemented during the 1980s, led to an expansion of private ownership of shares, resulting in an increase in the importance of stock markets. Privatization extended to the social security system, which was

converted into a privately managed pension fund system. These pension funds have been allowed, subject to certain limitations, to invest in stocks and are currently major investors in the stock market. Some market participants, including pension fund administrators, are highly regulated with respect to investment and remuneration criteria, but the general market is less regulated than the U.S. market with respect to disclosure requirements and information usage.

The SSE is Chile’s principal exchange and accounts for approximately 86.87% of securities traded in Chile. Approximately 12.91% of equity trading is conducted on the Chilean Electronic Stock Exchange, an electronic trading market created by banks and non-member brokerage houses. The remaining equity trading is conducted on the Valparaíso Stock Exchange.

Equities, closed-end funds, fixed-income securities, short-term and money market securities, gold and U.S. dollars are traded on the SSE. In 1991, the SSE initiated a futures market with two instruments: U.S. dollar futures and Selective Shares Price Index, or IPSA, futures. Securities are traded primarily through an open voice auction system; a firm offers system or daily auctions. Trading through the open voice system occurs on each business day between 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The SSE has an electronic system of trade, calledTelepregón HT, which operates continuously for stocks trading in high volumes from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (or 5:00 p.m., depending on the period of the year). The Chilean Electronic Stock Exchange operates continuously from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (or 5:30 p.m., depending on the period of the year) on each business day. In February 2000, the SSE Off-Shore Market began operations. In the Off-Shore Market, publicly offered foreign securities are traded and quoted in U.S. dollars.

Brazil

Bovespa is a Brazilian publicly-held company, created in 2008, through the integration between the São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo) and the Brazilian Mercantile & Futures Exchange (Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros).

Bovespa is the most important Brazilian institution to intermediate equity market transactions and the only securities, commodities and futures exchange in Brazil. Trading on such exchanges is limited to member brokerage firms and to limited number of authorized non-members. LATAM’s common shares are listed on the Bovespa.

Although the Brazilian equity market is Latin America’s largest in terms of market capitalization, it is smaller and less liquid than major U.S. and European securities markets. Any of the outstanding shares of a listed company may trade on a Brazilian stock exchange, but in most cases fewer than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the public, the remainder being held by small groups of controlling persons, governmental entities or one principal shareholder.

The Brazilian securities markets are principally governed by Law No. 6,385, of December 7, 1976, and Brazilian corporation law, each as amended and supplemented, and by regulations issued by the CVM, which has authority over stock exchanges and the securities markets generally; the National Monetary Council; and the Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions.

Trading through Bovespa occurs on each business day between 10:00 a.m. to 4:20 pm (Brazilian local time).

D. Selling Shareholders

Not applicable.

E. Dilution

Not applicable.

F. Expenses of the Issue

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

This Item reflects recent legal amendments effected by Chilean Law No. 20,382 on Corporate Governance, which was enacted on October 20, 2009, and came into effect on January 1, 2010, and Chilean Law No. 20,552, which modernize and encourage competition in the financial system, enacted on November 6, 2011 and into effect on December 17, 2011.

A. Share Capital

Not applicable.

B. Memorandum and Articles of Association

Set forth below is information concerning our share capital and a brief summary of certain significant provisions of our by-laws and Chilean law. This description contains all material information concerning the common shares but does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our by-laws, the Chilean Corporation Law and the Securities Market Law, each referred to below. For additional information regarding the common shares, reference is made to our by-laws, a copy of which is included as Exhibit 1.1 to this annual report on Form 20-F.

Organization and Register

LanLATAM Airlines Group is a publicly held stock corporation (sociedad anónima abierta) incorporated under the laws of Chile. LanLATAM Airlines Group was incorporated by a public deed dated December 30, 1983, an abstract of which was published in the Chilean Official Gazette (Diario Oficial de la República de Chile) No. 31.759 on December 31, 1983, and registered on page 20,341, No. 11,248 of the Chilean Real Estate and Commercial Registrar (Registro de Comercio del Conservador de Bienes Raices y Comercio de Santiago) for the year 1983. Our corporate purpose, as stated in our by-laws, is to provide a broad range of transportation and related services, as more fully set forth in Article Four thereof.

General

Shareholders’ rights in a Chilean company are generally governed by the company’s by-laws and the Chilean Corporation Law. Article 22 of the Chilean Corporation Law states that the purchaser of shares of a company implicitly accepts its by-laws and any prior agreements adopted at shareholders’ meetings. Additionally, the Chilean Corporation Law regulates the government and operation of corporations (“sociedades anónimas,” or S.A.) and provides for certain shareholder rights. Article 137 of the Chilean Corporation Law provides that the provisions of the Chilean Corporation Law take precedence over any contrary provision in a corporation’s by-laws. The Chilean Corporation Law and our by-laws also provide that all disputes arising among shareholders in their capacity as such or between us or our administrators and the shareholders may either be submitted to arbitration in Chile or to the courts of Chile at the election of the plaintiff initiating the action. Despite the foregoing, a recent legal amendment has forbidden certain individuals (directors, senior managers, administrators and main executives of the corporation, and any shareholder that directly or indirectly holds shares whose book or market value exceed 5,000 UF at the

moment of filing of the action) from submitting such action before the ordinary courts, thus obligating them to proceed with arbitration in all situations. Finally, Decree-Law No. 3,500 on Pension Fund Administrators, which allows pension funds to invest in the stock of qualified corporations, indirectly affects corporate governance and prescribes certain rights of shareholders. The Chilean Corporation Law sets forth the rules and requirements under which a corporation is deemed to be “publicly held.” Article 2 of the Chilean Corporation Law defines publicly held corporations as corporations that register their shares with theRegistro de Valores (Securities Registry) of the SVS, either voluntarily or pursuant to a legal obligation. In addition, Article 5 of the Chilean Securities Market Law indicates which corporation’s shares must be registered with the Securities Registry:

 

one with 500 or more shareholders; and

 

one in which 100 or more shareholders own at least 10% of the subscribed capital (excluding any direct or indirect individual holdings exceeding 10%).

The framework of the Chilean securities market is regulated by the SVS under the Securities Market Law and the Chilean Corporation Law, which imposes certain disclosure requirements, restricts insider trading, prohibits price manipulation and protects minority investors. In particular, the Securities Market Law establishes requirements for public offerings, stock exchanges and brokers and outlines disclosure requirements for corporations that issue publicly offered securities.

Ownership Restrictions

Under Articles 12 and 20 of the Securities Market Law and Circular 289General Rule 269 issued by the SVS in 2009, certain information regarding transactions in shares of publicly held corporations must be reported to the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges on which the shares are listed. Since the ADRs are deemed to represent the shares underlying the ADSs, transactions in ADRs will be subject to those reporting requirements. Among other matters, the beneficial owners of ADSs that directly or indirectly hold 10% or more of the subscribed capital of LanLATAM Airlines Group, or that reach or exceed such percentage through an acquisition, are required to report to the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges, the day following the event:

 

any acquisition or sale of shares; and

any acquisition or sale of contracts or securities the price or performance of which depends on the price variation of the Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s shares.

These obligations are extended (i) to certain individuals (immediate family, next of kin and others) if the ADSs holder is a natural person; (ii) to any entity controlled by the holder, if the ADSs is an legal entity,; and (iii) to groups, if a holder has any joint action agreement with other holders and the group reaches or exceeds the cited threshold.

In addition, majority shareholders must state in their report whether their purpose is to acquire control of the company or if they are making a financial investment.

Under Article 54 of the Securities Market Law and under SVS regulations, persons or entities that intend to acquire control, whether directly or indirectly, of a publicly traded company, must follow certain notice requirements, regardless of the acquisition vehicle or procedure or whether the acquisition will be made through direct subscriptions or private transactions. In the first place, the potential acquiror must send a written communication to the target corporation, any companies controlling or controlled by the target corporation, the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges on which the target’s securities are listed, stating, among other things, the person or entity purchasing or selling and the price and conditions of any negotiations. Subsequently, the potential acquiror must also inform the public of its planned acquisition by means of a publication in two Chilean newspapers with national distribution and by uploading such notice to the acquiror’s website, if available. Both requirements shall be met at least ten business days prior to the date on which the acquisition transaction is to close, and in any event, as soon as negotiations regarding the change of control have been formalized or when confidential information or documents concerning the target are delivered to the potential acquiror. The notices must state, among other things, the person or entity purchasing or selling and the price and conditions of any negotiations.

In addition to the foregoing, Article 54A of the Securities Market Law requires that within two business days of the completion of the transactions pursuant to which a person has acquired control of a publicly traded company, a notice shall be published in the same newspapers in which the notice referred to above was published and notices shall be sent to the same persons mentioned in the preceding paragraphs.

Consequently, a beneficial owner of ADSs intending to acquire control of LanLATAM Airlines Group will be subject to the foregoing reporting requirements.

The provisions of the aforementioned articles do not apply whenever the acquisition is being made through a tender or exchange offer.

Title XXV of the Securities Market Law on tender offers and SVS regulations provide that the following transactions shall be carried out through a tender offer:

 

an offer which allows to take control of a publicly traded company, unless the shares are being sold by a controlling shareholder of such company at a price in cash which is not substantially higher than the market price and the shares of such company are actively traded on a stock exchange;

 

an offer for all the outstanding shares of a publicly traded company upon acquiring two-thirds or more of its voting shares (this offer must be made at a price not lower than the price at which appraisal rights may be exercised, that is, book value if the shares of the company are not actively traded or, if the shares of the company are actively traded, the weighted average price at which the stock has been traded during the two months immediately preceding the acquisition); and

 

an offer for a controlling percentage of the shares of a publicly traded company if the acquiror intends to take control of the company (whether publicly-traded or privately held) controlling such publicly traded company, to the extent that the latter represents 75.0% or more of the consolidated net assets of the former.

Article 200 of the Securities Market Law prohibits any shareholder that has taken control of a publicly traded company from acquiring, for a period of twelve months from the date of the transaction that granted it control of the

publicly traded company, a number of shares equal to or higher than 3.0% of the outstanding issued shares of the target without making a tender offer at a price per share not lower than the price paid at the time of taking control. Should the acquisition from the other shareholders of the company be made on the floor of a stock exchange and on a pro rata basis, the controlling shareholder may purchase a higher percentage of shares, if so permitted by the regulations of the stock exchange.

Title XV of the Securities Market Law sets forth the basis for determining what constitutes a controlling power, a direct holding and a related party.

Capitalization

Under Chilean law, the shareholders of a company, acting at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting, have the power to authorize an increase in the company’s share capital. When an investor subscribes issued shares, the shares are registered in that investor’s name even without payment, and the investor is treated as a shareholder for all purposes except with regard to receipt of dividends and return of capital, provided that the shareholders may, by amending the by-laws, also grant the right to receive dividends of distribution of capital despite not having paid for the subscribed shares. The investor becomes eligible to receive dividends once it has paid for the shares, or, if it has paid for only a portion of such shares, it is entitled to receive a corresponding pro rata portion of the dividends declared with respect to such shares, unless the company’s by-laws provide otherwise. If an investor does not pay for shares for which it has subscribed on or prior to the date agreed upon for payment, the company is entitled under Chilean law to auction the shares on the appropriate stock exchange, and it has a cause of action against the investor to recover the difference between the subscription price and the price received for the sale of those shares at auction.

However, until such shares are sold at auction, the investor continues to exercise all the rights of a shareholder (except the right to receive dividends and return of capital, as noted above). Regarding shares issued but not paid for within the period determined by the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting for their payment (which period cannot exceed three years from the date of such shareholders’ meeting), until January 1, 2010 they were canceled and no longer available for issuance by us. As of January 1, 2010, the board of directors of LanLATAM Airlines Group has a legal obligation to initiate the necessary legal actions to collect the unpaid amounts, unless the shareholders’ meeting which authorized the capital increase, allowed the board to abstain from taking such action by a vote of two thirds of the issued shares, in which case the former rule still applies. Once the foregoing legal actions are exhausted, the board of directors shall propose to the shareholders’ meeting the appropriate capital adjustment measures, to be decided by simple majority. Fully paid shares are not subject to further calls or assessments or to liabilities of Lan Airlines.LATAM Airlines Group.

As of February 29, 2012,28, 2013, our share capital consisted of 340.381.831483,555,791 common shares, all of which were subscribed and fully paid. Chilean law recognizes the right to issue common and preferred shares. To date, we have issued and are authorized by our shareholders to issue only common shares. Each share of stock is entitled to one vote. Pursuant to an employee compensation plan approved by extraordinary shareholders’ meetings dated April 5, 2007held on December 21, 2011 and October 29, 2009,September 4, 2012, the issuance of certain shares has been authorized but that has not been made effective, in full, as such issuance is subject to the exercising of rights granted to certain employees that expire on March 31, 2012.December 21, 2016.

Preemptive Rights and Increases in Share Capital

The Chilean Corporation Law requires Chilean companies to offer existing shareholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing percentage of ownership in a company whenever that company issues new shares for cash, except for up to 10% of the capital increase which may be destineddesignated to employee compensation pursuant to article 24 of the Corporation Law. Under this requirement, any preemptive rights will be offered by us to the depositary as the registered owner of the common shares underlying the ADSs, but holders of ADSs and shareholders located in the United States will not be allowed to exercise preemptive rights with respect to new issuances of shares by us unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those common shares or an exemption from the registration requirements thereunder is available.

We intend to evaluate at the time of any preemptive rights offering the costs and potential liabilities associated with the preparation and filing of a registration statement with the SEC, as well as the indirect benefits of enabling the exercise by the holders of ADSs and shareholders located in the United States of preemptive rights and any other

factors we consider appropriate at the time. No assurances can be given that any registration statement would be filed. If preemptive rights are not made available to ADS holders, the depositary may sell those holders’ preemptive rights and distribute the proceeds thereof if a secondary market for such rights exists and a premium can be recognized over the cost of such sale. In the event that the depositary does not sell such rights at a premium over the cost of any such sale, all or certain holders of ADRs may receive no value for the preemptive rights. The inability of holders of ADSs to exercise preemptive rights in respect of common shares underlying their ADSs could result in a change in their percentage ownership of common shares following a preemptive rights offering.

Under Chilean law, preemptive rights are freely exercisable, transferable or waived by shareholders during a thirty-day period commencing upon publication of the official notice announcing the start of the preemptive rights period in the newspaper designated by the shareholders’ meeting. The preemptive right of the shareholders is the pro rata amount of the shares registered in their name in the shareholders’ registry of LanLATAM Airlines Group as of the fifth business day prior to the date of publication of the notice announcing the start of the preemptive rights period. During such thirty-day period (except for shares as to which preemptive rights have been waived), Chilean companies are not permitted to offer any newly issued common shares for sale to third parties. For that thirty-day period and an additional thirty-day period, Chilean publicly held corporations are not permitted to offer any unsubscribed common shares for sale to third parties on terms that are more favorable to the purchaser than those offered to shareholders. At the end of such additional thirty-day period, Chilean publicly held corporations are authorized to sell non-subscribed shares to third-parties on any terms, provided they are sold on a Chilean stock exchange.

Directors

Our by-laws provide for a board of nine directors. Compensation to be paid to directors must be approved by vote at the annual shareholders’ meeting. We hold elections for all positions on the board of directors every two years. Under our by-laws, directors are elected by cumulative voting. Each shareholder has one vote per share and may cast all of his or her votes in favor of one nominee or may apportion his or her votes among any number of nominees. These voting provisions currently ensure that a shareholder owning more than 10% of our outstanding shares is able to elect at least one representative to our board of directors.

Under the Chilean Corporation Law, transactions of a publicly-traded company with a “related” party must be conducted on an arm’s-length basis and must satisfy certain approval and disclosure requirements which are different from the ones that apply to a privately-held company. The conditions apply to the publicly-traded company and to all of its subsidiaries.

These transactions include any negotiation, act, contract or operation in which the publicly-traded company intervenes together with either (i) parties which are legally deemed related pursuant to article 100 of the Chilean Securities Market Law, (ii) a director, senior manager, administrator, main executive or liquidator of the company, either on their own behalf or on behalf of a third party, including those individuals’ spouses or close relatives, (iii) companies in which the foregoing individuals own at least 10% (directly or indirectly), or in which they serve as directors, senior managers, administrators or main executives (iv) parties indicated as such in the publicly-traded company’s by-laws, or identified by the directors’ committee, or (v) those who have served as directors, senior managers, administrators, main executives or liquidators of the counterparty in the last eighteen months and are now serving in one of those positions at the publicly-traded company.

Corporations may enter into transactions with related parties if (i) the transaction is in the interest of the corporation, (ii) the transaction is made on an arm’s-length basis at market conditions, (iii) the individuals involved in the transactions report them immediately to the board, (iv) the transaction is approved after a reasoned explanation by the majority of the board, excluding those directors or liquidators that are involved in the transaction (who shall, nonetheless, render an opinion on the matter if required by the board), (v) the decisions of the board is disclosed at the next shareholders’ meeting, and (vi) in case the majority of the board is disqualified to vote, the majority of the non-involved directors have approved the transaction, or two thirds of the voting shares have approved the transaction).

If as noted in clause (vi) above,of the preceding paragraph, the transaction is to be approved by the shareholder’s meeting, the following additional rules apply: (i) the board shall appoint an independent appraiser that shall report to the shareholders on the

transaction; (ii) the director’s committee or the non-involved directors may appoint a second independent appraiser; (iii) the appraiser’s reports shall be made available for fifteen days; (iv) the receipt and availability of the reports shall be disclosed as a material fact; (iv) directors shall render an opinion on the transaction within five business days after receiving the reports.

Transactions which do not meet the foregoing requirements are valid and enforceable, but neither the corporation nor its shareholders shall have a cause of action to sue the infringing party for reimbursement on behalf of the corporation, for a total of the benefits reported to the interested party, in addition to indemnification for the damages caused. In such proceedings, the defendant shall prove that the transaction met the legal requirements.

The Chilean Corporation Law sets forth a number of exceptions to the foregoing rules. In the following situations, transactions with related parties may be carried out without complying with the foregoing rules: (i) if a transaction does not involve a substantial amount (if it does not exceed 1.0% of the net worth of the company and does not exceed the equivalent of 2,000 UF or approximately US$92,00096,554 as of the date of this annual report on Form 20F) unless such a transaction exceeds 20,000 UF (for this calculation all similar transactions carried out within a consecutive 12-month period between the same parties or for the same subject matter, shall be deemed as a single transaction), (ii) transactions which according to the policies determined by the board of directors, are deemed to be within the ordinary course of business (the determination of such policies shall be disclosed as a material fact and made available to shareholders), and (iii) if the counterparty is an entity in which the publicly-traded company has, directly or indirectly, at least a 95.0% ownership. As per the exemption indicated in (ii) above, on December 29, 2009, the Board of Directors of LAN determined the citedLATAM Airlines Group established policies setting forth the transactions that fall within the ordinary course of business. That determination was publicly disclosed on the same day and is currently available on LAN’sLATAM Airlines Group’s website under the “Corporate Governance” section.

Shareholders’ Meetings and Voting Rights

The Chilean Corporation Law requires that an ordinary annual meeting of shareholders be held within the first four months of each year after being called by the board of directors (generally they are held in April, but in any case following the preparation of our financial statements, including the report of our auditors, for the previous fiscal year). Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s by-laws further provide that the ordinary annual meeting of shareholders must take place between February 1 and April 30. The shareholders at the ordinary annual meeting approve the annual financial statements, including the report of our auditors, the annual report, the dividend policy and the final dividend on the prior year’s profits, elect the board of directors (in our case, every two years or earlier if a vacancy occurs) and approve any other matter that does not require an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting. The most recent extraordinary meeting of our shareholders was held on December 21, 2011,September 4, 2012, and the most recent ordinary annual meeting of our shareholders was held on April 29, 2011.26, 2012.

Extraordinary shareholders’ meetings may be called by the board of directors, if deemed appropriate, and ordinary or extraordinary shareholders’ meetings must be called by the board of directors when requested by shareholders representing at least 10.0% of the issued voting shares or by the SVS. In addition, as from January 1, 2010 there are two new rules in this regard: (i) the SVS may directly call for an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting in case of a publicly-traded companies, and (ii) any kind of shareholders’ meeting may be self-convened and take place if all voting shares attend, regardless of the fulfillment of the notice and other type of procedural requirements.

Notice to convene the ordinary annual meeting or an extraordinary meeting is given by means of three notices which must be published in a newspaper of our corporate domicile (currently Santiago, Chile) designated by the shareholders at their annual meeting and, if the shareholders fail to make such designation, the notice must be published in the Chilean Official Gazette pursuant to legal requirements. The first notice must be published not less than fifteen days and not more than twenty days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Notice also must be mailed not less than fifteen days in advance of the meeting to each shareholder and to the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges. Currently, we publish our official notices in the newspaperLa Tercera(available online at www.latercera.com).

The quorum for a shareholders’ meeting is established by the presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders representing a majority of our issued common shares. If that quorum is not reached, the meeting can be reconvened within forty-five days, and at the second meeting the shareholders present are deemed to constitute a quorum regardless of the percentage of the common shares that they represent.

Only shareholders registered with us on the fifth business day prior to the date of a meeting are entitled to attend and vote their shares. A shareholder may appoint another individual (who need not be a shareholder) as his or her proxy to attend and vote on his or her behalf. Proxies addressed to us that do not designate a person to exercise the proxy are taken into account in order to determine if there is a sufficient quorum to hold the meeting, but the shares represented thereby are not entitled to vote at the meeting. The proxies must fulfill the requirements set forth by the Chilean Corporation Law and its regulatory norms. Every shareholder entitled to attend and vote at a shareholders’ meeting has one vote for every share subscribed.

The following matters can only be considered at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting:

 

our dissolution;

 

a merger, transformation, division or other change in our corporate form or the amendment of our by-laws;

 

the issuance of bonds or debentures convertible into shares;

 

the conveyance of 50% or more of our assets (whether or not it includes our liabilities);

the adoption or amendment of any business plan which contemplates the conveyance of assets in excess of the foregoing percentage;

 

the conveyance of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary, if the latter represents at least 20% of our assets;

 

the conveyance of shares of a subsidiary which entails the transfer of control;

 

granting of a security interest or a personal guarantee in each case to secure the obligations of third parties, unless to secure or guarantee the obligations of a subsidiary, in which case only the approval of the board of directors will suffice; and

 

other matters that require shareholder approval according to Chilean law or the by-laws.

The matters referred to in the first seven items listed above may only be approved at a meeting held before a notary public, who shall certify that the minutes are a true record of the events and resolutions of the meeting.

The by-laws establish that resolutions are passed at shareholders’ meetings by the affirmative vote of an absolute majority of those voting shares present or represented at the meeting. However, under the Chilean Corporation Law, the vote of a two-thirds majority of the outstanding voting shares is required to approve any of the following actions:

 

a change in our corporate form, division or merger with another entity;

 

amendment to our term of existence, if any;

 

our early dissolution;

 

change in our corporate domicile;

 

decrease of our capital stock;

 

approval of contributions and the assessment thereof whenever consisting of assets other than money;

any modification of the authority reserved for the shareholders’ meetings or limitations on the powers of the board of directors;

 

decrease in the number of members of the board of directors;

 

the conveyance of 50% or more our assets (whether or not it includes our liabilities);

 

the adoption or amendment of any business plan which contemplates the conveyance of assets in excess of the foregoing percentage;

 

the conveyance of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary, if the latter represents at least 20% of our assets;

 

the conveyance of shares of a subsidiary which entails the transfer of control;

 

the form that dividends are paid in;

 

granting a security interest or a personal guarantee in each case to secure obligations of third parties that exceeds 50% of our assets, unless to secure or guarantee the obligations of a subsidiary, in which case only approval of the board of directors will suffice;

the acquisition of our own shares, when, and on the terms and conditions, permitted by law;

 

all other matters provided for in the by-laws; and

 

the correction of any formal defect in our incorporation or any amendment to our by-laws that refers to any of the matters indicated in the first thirteen items listed above;

 

the institution of the right of the controlling shareholder who has purchases at least 95% of the shares, to purchase shares of the outstanding minority shareholders pursuant to the procedure set forth in article 71 bis of the Corporation Law;

 

the approval or ratification of transactions with related parties, as per article 147 of the Corporation Law (described above).

Amendments to the by-laws that have the effect of establishing, modifying or eliminating any special rights pertaining to any series of shares require the consenting vote of holders of two-thirds of the shares of the affected series. As noted above, LanLATAM Airlines Group does not have special series of shares.

In general, Chilean law does not require a publicly held corporation to provide the level and type of information that the U.S. securities laws require a reporting company to provide to its shareholders in connection with a solicitation of proxies. However, shareholders are entitled to examine the books of the company and its subsidiaries within the fifteen-day period before thea scheduled meeting. No later than the first notice summoning an ordinary shareholder’s meeting, the board of directors of a publicly held corporation shallis required to send to every shareholder notice by regular mail, a notice containing a reference to the issues that will be discussed, together with instructions to obtain all the appropriate documentation regarding those issues, in additionand publish such notice on its website. The board is also required to being obligated to publish them in our website, and alsoprovide a copy of the annual report and the financial statements of the company. However, the SVS may authorize companies that have a large number of shareholders to limit the sending of such documents only to those shareholders who have a number of shares exceeding a certain number, and, in any case, to any shareholder thatwho has required of the company such sending.requested a written notice. Shareholders who do not fall into this category but who request it must be sent a copy of our annual report. In addition to these requirements, we regularly have provided, and currently intend to continue to provide, together with the notice of shareholders’ meeting, a proposal for the final annual dividend for shareholder approval. See “—Dividend and Liquidation Rights” below.

The Chilean Corporation Law provides that, whenever shareholders representing 10% or more of the issued voting shares so request, a Chilean company’s annual report must include such shareholders’ comments and proposal in relation to the company’s affairs, together with the comments and proposals set forth by the directors’ committee. Similarly, the Chilean Corporation Law provides that whenever the board of directors of a publicly held corporation convenes an ordinary meeting of the shareholders and solicits proxies for that meeting, or distributes information supporting its decisions or other similar material, it is obligated to include as an annex to its annual report any pertinent comments and proposals that may have been made by shareholders owning 10% or more of the company’s voting shares who have requested that such comments and proposals be included, together with the comments and proposals set forth by the directors’ committee.

Dividend and Liquidation Rights

In accordance with the Chilean Corporation Law, LanLATAM Airlines Group must distribute an annual cash dividend equal to at least 30% of its annual net income calculated in accordance with IFRS, unless otherwise decided by a unanimous vote of the holders of all issued shares, and unless and except to the extent it has accumulated losses. If there is no net income in a given year, LanLATAM Airlines Group can elect but is not legally obligated to distribute dividends out of retained earnings. All outstanding common shares are entitled to share equally in all dividends declared by LanLATAM Airlines Group, unless the shares have not been fully paid by the shareholder after being subscribed.

For all dividend distributions agreed by the board of directors in excess of the mandatory minimum of 30% noted in the preceding paragraph, LanLATAM Airlines Group may grant an option to its shareholders to receive those

dividends in cash, or in shares issued by either LanLATAM Airlines Group or other corporations. Shareholders who do not expressly elect to receive a dividend other than in cash are legally presumed to have decided to receive the dividend in cash. A U.S. holder of ADSs may, in the absence of an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or an available exemption from the registration requirement thereunder, effectively be required to receive a dividend in cash. See “—Preemptive Rights and Increases in Share Capital” above.

Dividends that are declared but not paid within the appropriate time period set forth in the Chilean Corporation Law (as to minimum dividends, thirty days after declaration; as to additional dividends, the date set for payment at the time of declaration) are adjusted to reflect the change in the value of the UF. The UF is a daily indexed, Chilean peso-denominated accounting unit designed to discount the effect of Chilean inflation and it is based on the previous month’s inflation rate as officially determined. Such dividends also accrue interest at the then-prevailing rate for UF-denominated deposits during such period. The right to receive a dividend lapses if it is not claimed within five years from the date such dividend is payable. After that period, the amount not claimed is given to a non-profit organization, theJunta Nacional de Cuerpos de Bomberos de Chile(the National Corporation of Firefighters).

In the event of Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s liquidation, the holders of fully paid common shares would participate pro rata in the distribution of assets remaining after payment of all creditors. Holders of shares not fully paid will participate in such distribution in proportion to the amount paid.

Approval of Financial Statements

The board of directors is required to submit our consolidated financial statements to the shareholders for their approval at the annual ordinary shareholders’ meeting. If the shareholders reject the financial statements, the board of directors must submit new financial statements not later than sixty days from the date of that meeting. If the shareholders reject the new financial statements, the entire board of directors is deemed removed from office and a new board is to be elected at the same meeting. Directors who approved such financial statements are disqualified for re-election for the ensuing period.

Right of Dissenting Shareholders to Tender Their Shares

The Chilean Corporation Law provides that, upon the adoption at an extraordinary meeting of shareholders of any of the resolutions or if it takes place any of the situations enumerated below, dissenting or affected shareholders acquire the right to withdraw and to compel the company to repurchase their shares, subject to the fulfillment of certain terms and conditions. However, such right shall be suspended if we are declared bankrupt or are subject to a

creditor’s agreement pursuant to Title XII of Book IV of the Commerce Code. In the case of holders of ADRs, however, in order to exercise such rights, holders of ADRs would be required to first withdraw the common shares represented by the ADRs pursuant to the terms of the deposit agreement. Such holders of ADRs would need to perfect the withdrawal of the common shares on or before the fifth business day prior to the date of the meeting.

“Dissenting shareholders” are defined as those who attend a shareholders’ meeting and vote against a resolution which results in the withdrawal right, or, if absent at such a meeting, those who state in writing to the company their opposition to such resolution within the following thirty days. Dissenting shareholders must perfect their withdrawal rights by tendering their stock to the company within thirty days after adoption of the resolution.

The price paid to a dissenting shareholder of a publicly held corporation is the weighted average of the sales prices for the shares as reported on the Chilean stock exchanges on which the shares are quoted for the two-month period preceding the event giving rise to the withdrawal right. If, because of the volume, frequency, number and diversity of the buyers and sellers, the SVS determines that the shares are not shares actively traded on a stock exchange (acciones de transacción bursátil), the price paid to the dissenting shareholder is the book value. Book value for this purpose equals paid capital plus reserves and profits, less losses, divided by the total number of subscribed shares (whether entirely or partially paid). For the purpose of making this calculation, the last annual balance sheet is used and adjusted to reflect inflation up to the date of the shareholders’ meeting that gave rise to the withdrawal right.

The resolutions and situations that result in a shareholder’s right to withdraw are the following:

 

the transformation of the company into an entity that is not a publicly held corporation governed by the Chilean Corporation Law;

the merger of the company with or into another company;

 

the conveyance of 50% or more of the assets of the company, whether or not such sale includes the company’s liabilities;

 

the adoption or amendment of any business plan which contemplates the conveyance of assets in excess of the foregoing percentage;

 

the conveyance of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary, if the latter represents at least 20% of our assets;

 

the conveyance of shares of a subsidiary which entails the transfer of control;

 

the creation of preferential rights for a class of shares or an extension, amendment or reduction to those already existing, in which case the right to withdraw only accrues to the dissenting shareholders of the class or classes of shares adversely affected;

 

the correction of any formal defect in the incorporation of the company or any amendment to the company’s by-laws that grants the right to withdraw;

 

the granting of security interests or personal guarantees to secure or guarantee third parties’ obligations exceeding 50% of the company’s assets, except with regard to subsidiaries;

 

resolutions of the shareholders’ meeting approving the decision to make private a public corporation in the case the requirements set forth in “—General” cease to be met;

 

if a publicly-traded company ceases to be obligated to register its shares in the Securities Registry of the SVS, and an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting agrees to de-register the shares and finalize its disclosure obligations mandated by the Corporation Law;

if the controlling shareholder of a publicly-traded company reaches over 95% of the shares (in such case, the right must be exercised within 30 days of the date in which the threshold is reached, circumstance that must be communicated by means of a publication); and

 

such other causes as may be established by the company’s by-laws (no such additional resolutions currently are specified in our by-laws).

In addition, shareholders of publicly held corporations have the right to withdraw if a person acquires two-thirds or more of the outstanding shares of such corporation with the right to vote (except as a result of other shareholders not having subscribed and paid a capital increase) and does not make a tender offer for the remaining shares within thirty days after acquisition.

Under Article 69(bis) of the Chilean Corporation Law, the right to withdraw also is granted to shareholders (other than pension funds that administer private pension plans under the national pension law), under certain terms and conditions, if a company were to become controlled by the Chilean government, directly or through any of its agencies, and if two independent rating agencies downgrade the rating of its stock from first class because of certain actions specified in Article 69(bis) undertaken by the company or the Chilean government that affect negatively and substantially the earnings of the company. Shareholders must perfect their withdrawal rights by tendering their shares to the company within thirty days of the date of the publication of the new rating by two independent rating agencies. If the withdrawal right is exercised by a shareholder invoking Article 69(bis), the price paid to the dissenting shareholder shall be the weighted average of the sales price for the shares as reported on the stock

exchanges on which the company’s shares are quoted for the six-month period preceding the publication of the new rating by two independent rating agencies. If, as previously described, the SVS determines that the shares are not actively traded on a stock exchange, the price shall be the book value calculated as described above.

There is no legal precedent as to whether a shareholder that has voted both for and against a proposal (such as the depositary) may exercise withdrawal rights with respect to the shares voted against the proposal. As such, there is doubt as to whether holders of ADRs who have not surrendered their ADRs and withdrawn common shares on or before the fifth business day prior to the shareholder meeting will be able to exercise withdrawal rights either directly or through the depositary with respect to the shares represented by ADRs. Under the provisions of the deposit agreement the depositary will not exercise these withdrawal rights.

The circumstance indicated above regarding ownership in excess of 95% by the controlling shareholder creates not only a withdrawal right for the remaining minority shareholders, but as of January 1, 2010, it also creates a “squeeze out” right by the controlling shareholder with respect to those same shareholders (granting a call option by means of which the controlling shareholder may buy-out the existing ownership participations pursuant to the provisions of article 71 bis of the Corporation Law).

Registration and Transfers

TheDepósito Central de Valores, (“DCV”), acts as Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group’s registration agent. In the case of jointly owned common shares, an attorney-in-fact must be appointed to represent the joint owners in dealings with us.

C. Material Contracts

Boeing

Boeing 767-300 Fleet

On May 9, 1997, we entered into the Aircraft General Terms Agreement with The Boeing Company (“AGTA”), applicable to all Boeing aircraft contracted for purchase from The Boeing Company.

On January 30, 1998, we entered into Purchase Agreement No. 2126 with The Boeing Company (“Purchase Agreement No. 2126”) to acquire two Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft.

On November 11, 2004, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 16 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 to acquire one additional Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft and three Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$140,000,000.

On April 28, 2005, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 20 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 to acquire two additional Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft and one Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$300,000,000.

On July 20, 2005, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 21 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 to acquire three Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$410,000,000.

On March 31, 2006, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 22 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 to acquire three Boeing 767-300 aircraft. Furthermore, we converted two Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft to two Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$430,000,000.

On December 14, 2006, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 23 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 to acquire three additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$460,000,000.

On November 10, 2008, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 24 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 to acquire four additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft and two purchase rights for Boeing 767-300 aircraft. Two of these aircraft were delivered in 2011, while the other two aircraft have a scheduled delivery date in 2012. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$636 million.

On March 22, 2010, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 28 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, whereby we agreed to accelerate the delivery of ten 787-8 aircraft, substitute four aircraft from 787-916 to 787-816 and substitute three 767-316ER to 767-316F freighter aircraft. Moreover, on November 10, 2010, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 29 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, whereby we agreed to accelerate the delivery of three Aircraft and substitute those three aircraft from 767-316F to 767-316ER.

On February 15, 2011, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 30No.30 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126No.2126 to acquire three additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft. Delivery is scheduled to take place in 2012. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$510 million.

On May 10, 2011, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 31No.31 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126No.2126 to acquire five additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft and four purchase rights for Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft. Delivery is scheduled to take place in 2012. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$870 million.

On December 22, 2011 we entered into supplemental agreement No. 32No.32 to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126No.2126 to exercise two purchase options for two additional Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft,while the remaining purchase options were deleted. Delivery is scheduled to take place in 2012. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$340 million.

Boeing 787-8/9 Fleet

On October 29, 2007, we entered into Purchase Agreement No. 3256 with the Boeing Company (“Purchase Agreement No. 3256”) to acquire eighteen18 Boeing 787-8 aircraft and eight Boeing 787-9 aircraft to be delivered between 2012 and 2016. This purchase agreement provides us with the option of purchasing fifteen additional aircraft to be delivered in 2017 and 2018. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of the Boeing aircraft for which we had firm commitments to take delivery under this contract is US$3.2 billion.

On March 22, 2010, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 1 to the Purchase Agreement No. 3256 to advance the schedule delivery date of ten Boeing 787-8 aircraft and substitute four Boeing 787-9 aircraft into four Boeing 787-8 aircraft.

On July 8, 2010, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 2 to the Purchase Agreement No. 3256 to advance the schedule delivery date of two Boeing 787-8 aircraft.

On August 24, 2012, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 3 to the Purchase Agreement No. 3256 to replace two Boeing 787-8 aircraft with two Boeing 787-8 aircraft with a later delivery.

Boeing 777 Freighter Fleet

On July 3, 2007, we entered into Purchase Agreement No. 3194 with the Boeing Company (“Purchase Agreement No. 3194”) to acquire two Boeing 777 freighter aircraft with schedule deliveries dates in 2011 and 2012. The2012.The estimated gross value (at list prices) of the Boeing aircraft for which we had firm commitments to take delivery under this contract was US$545 million.

On March 22, 2010, we entered into letter agreement 6-1162-KSW-6454R2 to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194 to transfer two purchase rights from Purchase Agreement No. 2126 to Purchase Agreement No. 3194.

On November 2, 2010, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 2 to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194, to exercise one of the two options for a Boeing 777 freighter aircraft with schedule delivery date in 2012. The2012.The estimated gross value (at list prices) of this aircraft was US$280 million.

On September 22, 2011, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 3 to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194 to advance the schedule delivery date of one firm Boeing 777 freighter aircraft during 2012.

On August 9, 2012, we entered into supplemental agreement No. 4 to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194 to reflect the configuration of the aircraft covered under such Purchase Agreement.

Airbus

On March 20, 1998, we entered into the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement with Airbus S.A.S. (“Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement”) to acquire five Airbus 320 family aircraft.

On November 14, 2003, we entered into amendment No. 1 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to exercise three purchase rights for Airbus 319 aircraft, among other things.

On October 4, 2005, we entered into amendment No. 2 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to acquire twenty five additional Airbus 320 family aircraft and fifteen purchase rights for Airbus A320 familyA320-Family aircraft.

On March 6, 2007, we entered into amendment No. 3 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to exercise fifteen purchase rights for fifteen Airbus A320 familyA320-Family aircraft.

On December 23, 2009, we entered into amendment No. 5 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to acquire thirty additional Airbus A320 familyA320-Family aircraft. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$2.0 billion.

According to clause 12.2 of the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement, applicable to all subsequent amendments, in case of a failure, as defined in such agreement, a service life policy for a period of 12 years after delivery of any given aircraft shall apply.

On May 10, 2010, we entered into amendment No. 6 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to convert the aircraft type of three aircraft and advance the scheduled delivery date of thirteen aircraft.

On May 19, 2010, we entered into amendment No. 7 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to advance the scheduled delivery date of three aircraft.

On September 23, 2010, we entered into amendment No. 8 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to convert the aircraft type of one aircraft and advance the scheduled delivery date of four aircraft.

On December 21, 2010, we entered into amendment No. 9 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to acquire fifty additional Airbus A320 familyA320-Family aircraft. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft was US$2,600,000,000.

On June 10, 2011, we entered into amendment No. 10 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to convert the aircraft type of three aircraft, to select sharklets for some aircraft and to notify delivery dates for some aircraft.

On November 3, 2011, we entered into amendment No. 11 to the Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement to convert the aircraft type of three aircraft and defer the schedule delivery date of four aircraft.

On November 19, 2012, we entered into amendment No. 12 to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement to convert the aircraft type of three aircraft, identify certain Aircraft as Sharklet Installed Aircraft and others as Sharklet Capable Aircraft, as those are defined in such Purchase Agreement, and notify the scheduled delivery month for certain aircraft.

On June 22, 2011, we entered into A320 NEO Purchase Agreement (“A320 NEO Purchase Agreement”) to acquire twenty Airbus 320 NEO family aircraft with schedule delivery dates in 2017 and 2018. The estimated gross value (at list prices) of these aircraft is US$1.7 billion.

Between April and August 2011, we entered into Buyback Agreements No. 3001, 3030, 3062, 3214 and 3216 with Airbus Financial Services for the sale of five A318 aircraft for approximately US$107 million. Between August 2012 and January 2013, we entered into Buyback Agreements No. 3371, 3390, 3438, 3469 and 3509 with Airbus Financial Services for the sale of five A318 aircraft for approximately US$102 million.

For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Fleet—Fleet Leasing and Financing Arrangements”.Arrangements.”

GE Commercial Aviation

On April 30, 2007, we also entered into an Aircraft Lease Common Terms Agreement with GE Commercial Aviation Services Limited and two Aircraft Lease Agreements with Wells Fargo Bank Northwest N.A., as owner trustee, for the lease of two Boeing B777-200LRF aircraft. These aircraft were delivered in 2009 and the leases shall remain in place for a term of 96 months.

For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Fleet—Fleet Leasing and Financing Arrangements”.Arrangements.”

GE Engine Services

On December 17, 2010, we entered into a Digital Services Agreement with GE Engine Services, LLC, for the provision of operational analysis, performance and maintenance services of aircraft engines.

CFM International

On December 17, 2010, we entered into General Terms Agreement No. CFM-1-2377460475 (the “GTA”) and Letter Agreement No. 1 to GTA with CFM International, Inc. (“CFM”) for the sale and support by CFM of spare engines, related equipment and spare parts. Moreover, on December 17, 2010, we entered into a Rate Per Flight Hour Engine Shop Maintenance Services Agreement with CFM for the provision by CMF of maintenance services over our aircraft engines.

General Electric Company

On July 11, 2011 we entered into Letter Agreement No. 12No.12 to the General Terms Agreements No. 6-9576 with General Electric Company for the purchase of four new CF6 80CB6F engines with delivery on 2013 and one purchase right for a CF6 80CB6F engine.

Pratt & Whitney Engine Leasing

On July 28, 2011, we entered into Used PW6122A Five Engine Purchase Agreement with Pratt & Whitney Engine Leasing, LLC for the sale of five PW6122A engines.

Proposed Merger Agreements

On January 18, 2011, we and Costa Verde Aeronáutica and Mineras del Cantábrico (we refer to these entities together as the “LAN controlling shareholders”) entered into an implementation agreement and an exchange offer agreement (we refer to these agreements together as the “transaction agreements”) with TAM S.A., TAM Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. (we refer to this entity as the “TAM controlling shareholder”) and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, Maurício Rolim Amaro, Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro and João Francisco Amaro (we refer to these individuals together as the “Amaro family”), which set forth the terms and conditions of a proposed business combination of LAN and TAM. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Transaction Agreements”. On January 12, 2012 the transaction agreements were extended until June 30, 2012.

On January 25, 2012, the Company, LAN controlling shareholders Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A. and Mineras del Cantábrico S.A., and TEP Chile S.A. entered into a Shareholders Agreement, which sets forth the parties’ agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of the LATAM Group, and voting and transfer of their respective LAN common shares and TEP Chile’s voting shares of Holdco I, following the effective time of the proposed combination with TAM.

On January 25, 2012, we entered into a Shareholders Agreement with TEP Chile S.A., which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of the LATAM Group following the effective time of the proposed combination with TAM.

On January 25, 2012, the Company, TEP Chile and Holdco I S.A. entered into a Shareholders Agreement, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of Holdco I, and voting and transfer of voting shares of Holdco I, following the effective time of the proposed combination with TAM.

On January 25, 2012, the Company, TAM S.A., TEP Chile S.A. and Holdco I S.A. entered into a Shareholders Agreement, which sets forth our agreement concerning the governance, management and operation of TAM and its subsidiaries following the effective time of the proposed combination with TAM.

For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Shareholders Agreements”.

Sale of Blue Expressthe “Sitio LAN.”

On January 25, 2011 Lan Cargo S.A. and Inversiones LanMay 29, 2012 the Board of Directors of Inmobiliaria Aeronautica S.A., subsidiariesa subsidiary of LANLATAM Airlines signed a promiseGroup, agreed to sell in favorthe real state located at Avenida Presidente Riesco 5537, Las Condes, Santiago, through a public auction. Such process finished on July 18, 2012 and the property was awarded to Sinergia Inmobiliaria S.A.in the amount of UF 646,261 (approximately US$31,342,987.6, converted at the exchange rate on April 15, 2013). On July 31, 2012 the Purchase Agreement was executed.

Sale of the Blue Express facilities.

On September 28, 2012 the Board of Directors of Inmobiliaria Aeronautica S.A., a subsidiary of LATAM Airlines Group, agreed to sell the real state located at Avenida Circunvalación Américo Vespucio 1401, Quilicura, Santiago to Sotraser S.A., a subsidiary of Bethia S.A. (“Bethia”) 100%, in the amount of UF 301,000 (approximately US$14,598,187.60 converted at the exchange rate on April 15, 2013). On December 28, 2012, the Purchase Agreement was executed.

TAM Material Contracts

A320/A330 Family Purchase Agreements

In November 2006, TAM entered into a purchase agreement with Airbus S.A.S. for the purchase of 31 A320-Family Aircraft and 6 A330-200 aircraft, with deliveries between 2007 and 2010.

In January 2008, TAM entered into a new purchase agreement for 20 A320-Family Aircraft and 4 A330-200 aircraft, with deliveries between 2007 and 2014.

In July 2010, TAM entered a purchase agreement for 20 A320-Family Aircraft with deliveries between 2014 and 2015.

In October 2011, TAM entered into a new purchase agreement for 10 A320-Family Aircraft with deliveries between 2016 and 2017, plus 22 A320 NEO Family Aircraft with deliveries between 2016 and 2018, plus 10 options rights for A320 NEO Family Aircraft.

In January 2012, TAM entered into Amendment No. 12 to the A320/A330 Purchase Agreement to reschedule the delivery dates of certain aircraft.

In November 2012, TAM entered into Amendment No. 13 to the A320/A330 Purchase Agreement to convert the aircraft type of A320 family aircraft.

In December 2012, TAM entered into Amendment No. 14 to the A320/A330 Purchase Agreement to convert the aircraft type of an A320 family aircraft and reschedule the delivery date of such aircraft.

A350 Family Purchase Agreement

In January 2008, TAM entered into a purchase agreement with Airbus S.A.S. for the purchase of 22 A350 aircraft plus 10 options rights for A350 aircraft. On July 2010, TAM exercised option rights for 5 of the capitalA350 aircraft, with the remaining 5 option rights to be exercised in the LAN subsidiaries Blue Express Intl. Servicios de Transporte Limitadafuture.

CFM56-5B Engine Maintenance Contract

In March 2006, TAM entered into an exclusive services agreement with GE Celma, a Brazilian subsidiary of General Electric Engine Services division, which remains in force until the latest Airbus A320 family aircraft powered by CFM56-5B engines is delivered to TAM (scheduled to occur in 2026).

V2500-A5 Engine Maintenance Agreement

In 2000, TAM entered into an engine maintenance contract with MTU Motoren-und Turbinen-Union München GmbH, or MTU, pursuant to which MTU agreed to provide certain maintenance, refurbishment, repair and Blue Expressmodification services with respect to approximately 105 TAY650-15 aircraft engines. This contract is complemented by a novation and amendment agreement between us and Rolls-Royce Brazil Ltda. pursuant to which Rolls-Royce Brazil Ltda., replaced MTU as contract counterparty. This agreement terminates on June 30, 2015.

PW4168 Engine Maintenance Agreement

In June 2007, TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. (together referredentered into an engine maintenance services agreement with Pratt & Whitney covering more than 20 engines contained in TAM’s A330-200 fleet. It is also a rate per engine flight hour contract agreement, which includes cost control mechanisms for TAM.

Sabre Contract

In October 2003, TAM entered into a general services agreement with Sabre Travel International Limited, pursuant to as “Blue Express”), companies engagedwhich TAM was granted a license (relating to the provision of maintenance services) for electronic reservation technology and database backup. This agreement will remain in ground courierforce for ten years, unless cancelled early by either party.

Amadeus Contract

In July 2009, TAM entered into a general services operating brands and certain computer programs. The price stated in the promissory contract was US$ 54 million subject to any adjustments that might arise as a result of a due diligence to be conducted by Bethia.

On April 6, 2011, LAN Cargo S.A. and Inversiones LAN S.A, as sellers, and Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Inversiones Betmin SpA (subsidiary of Bethia S.A.), as buyer, executed: (i) an Assignment of Social Rights; and (ii) a Share Purchase Agreement for the transfer of 100% of the capital in the LAN subsidiaries Blue Express Intl. Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Blue Expressagreement with Amadeus IT Group S.A., respectively. The final sale valuepursuant to which TAM was granted a license (relating to the provision of Blue Express was approximately US$53.5 million.maintenance services) for electronic reservation technology and database backup. This agreement will remain in force for ten years, unless cancelled early by either party.

D. Exchange Controls

Foreign Investment and Exchange Controls in Chile

The Central Bank of Chile is responsible, among other things, for monetary policies and exchange controls in Chile. Equity investments, including investments in shares of stock by persons who are non-Chilean residents, have been generally subject in the past to various exchange control regulations restricting the repatriation of their investments and the earnings thereon.

Article 47 of the Central Bank Act and former Chapter XXVI of the Central Bank Foreign Exchange Regulations regulated the foreign exchange aspects of the issuance of ADSs by a Chilean company until April 2001. According to former Chapter XXVI, the Central Bank of Chile and the depositary had to enter into an agreement in order to gain access to the formal exchange market. The issuers of the shares underlying the ADSs and the custodian could also be parties to these agreements and we are party to such agreement.agreements.

On April 16, 2001, the Central Bank of Chile agreed that, effective April 19, 2001:

 

prior foreign exchange restrictions would be eliminated: and

 

  

a new Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations (Compendio de Normas de Cambios Internacionales) would be applied.

The main objective of these amendments, as declared by the Central Bank of Chile, is to facilitate movement of capital in and out of Chile and to encourage foreign investment.

In connection with the change in policy, the Central Bank of Chile eliminated the following restrictions:

 

a reserve requirement with the Central Bank of Chile for a period of one year (this mandatory reserve was imposed on foreign loans and funds brought into Chile to purchase shares other than those acquired in the establishment of a new company or in the capital increase of the issuing company; the reserve requirement was gradually decreased from 30% of the proposed investment to 0%);

the requirement of prior approval by the Central Bank of Chile for certain operations;

 

mandatory return of foreign currency to Chile; and

 

mandatory conversion of foreign currency into Chilean pesos.

Under the new regulations, only the following limitations apply to these operations:

 

the Central Bank of Chile must be provided with information related to certain operations; and

 

certain operations must be conducted with the Formal Exchange Market.

The Central Bank of Chile also eliminated Chapter XXVI of the Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations, which regulated the establishment of an ADR facility by a Chilean company. Pursuant to the new rules, it is no longer necessary to seek the Central Bank of Chile’s prior approval in order to establish an ADR facility nor to enter into a foreign investment contract with the Central Bank of Chile. The establishment of an ADR facility is now regarded as an ordinary foreign investment, and simply requires that the Central Bank of Chile be informed of the transaction pursuant to Chapter XIV of the amended Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations and that the foreign currency transactions related thereby be conducted through the Formal Exchange Market.

However, all contracts executed under the provisions of former Chapter XXVI (including the foreign investment contract among LanLATAM Airlines Group, the Central Bank of Chile and the ADS depositary, or the “Foreign Investment Contract”), remainremained in full force and effect and continuecontinued to be governed by the provisions, and continuecontinued to be subject to the restrictions, set forth in former Chapter XXVI at the time of its abrogation. Our Foreign Investment Contract guaranteesguaranteed ADS investors access to the Formal Exchange Market to convert amounts from Chilean pesos into U.S. dollars and repatriate amounts received with respect to deposited common shares or common shares withdrawn from deposit or surrender of ADRs (including amounts received as cash dividends and proceeds from the sale in Chile of the underlying common shares and any rights arising from them).

The guarantee of access to the Formal Exchange Market under the Foreign Investment Contract requires compliance of the following conditions:

the funds to purchase the common shares underlying the ADSs are brought into Chile and converted into Chilean pesos through the Formal Exchange Market;

the purchase of the underlying common shares is made on a Chilean stock exchange; and

within five business days from conversion of the funds into Chilean pesos, the Central Bank of Chile is informed that the conversion funds were used to purchase the underlying common shares.

The following is a summary of material provisions of the Foreign Investment Contract, a form of which was filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-7750) that we filed on October 10, 1997 in connection with our November 6, 1997 offering. This summary is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to former Chapter XXVI and the Foreign Investment Contract.

Under former Chapter XXVI and the Foreign Investment Contract, the Central Bank of Chile agreed to grant to the depositary, on behalf of ADR holders, and to any investor not residing or domiciled in Chile who withdraws common shares upon surrender of ADRs, access to the Formal Exchange Market to convert Chilean pesos into U.S. dollars (and to remit those dollars outside Chile) in respect of common shares represented by ADSs or withdrawn shares, including amounts received as:

cash dividends;

proceeds from the sale in Chile of withdrawn shares or from shares distributed as a result of a liquidation, merger or consolidation of Lan Airlines (subject to receipt by the Central Bank of Chile of a certificate from the holder of the withdrawn shares or the distributed shares (or from an institution authorized by the Central Bank of Chile) that the holder’s residence and domicile are outside of Chile, and a certificate from a Chilean stock exchange (or from a brokerage or securities firm established in Chile) that the withdrawn shares or the distributed shares were sold on a Chilean stock exchange);

proceeds from the sale in Chile of preemptive rights to subscribe for additional common shares;

proceeds from the liquidation, merger or consolidation of Lan Airlines;

proceeds from the sale in Chile of common shares received as a dividend; and

other distributions, including those in respect of any recapitalization resulting from holding common shares represented by ADSs or withdrawn shares.

Former Chapter XXVI provided that access to the Formal Exchange Market in connection with dividend payments is conditioned on our certifying to the Central Bank of Chile that a dividend payment has been made and that any applicable tax has been withheld. We agreed to provide this certification. former Chapter XXVI also provides that access to the Formal Exchange Market in connection with the sale of withdrawn shares, or distribution on them, is conditioned upon receipt by the Central Bank of Chile of a certification by the depositary or custodian, as the case may be, that the common shares have been withdrawn in exchange for delivery of the appropriate ADRs and receipt of a waiver of the benefit of the Foreign Investment Contract with respect to them (except in connection with the proposed sale of the common shares) until the withdrawn shares are redeposited.

Former Chapter XXVI and the Foreign Investment Contract provided that a person who brings foreign currency into Chile to purchase common shares pursuant to the Foreign Investment Contract must convert that foreign currency into Chilean pesos on the date of entry into Chile, and must invest in common shares within five banking business days in order to receive the benefits of the Foreign Investment Contract. If a person does not invest in common shares within that period, that person can access the Formal Exchange Market to reacquire foreign currency, provided that the request is presented to the Central Bank of Chile within seven banking business days of the initial conversion into pesos. Common shares acquired as described above may be deposited in exchange for ADRs and will receive the benefits of the Foreign Investment Contract, subject to:

receipt by the Central Bank of Chile of a certificate from the depositary that the common shares have been deposited and that the related ADRs have been issued; and

receipt by the custodian of a declaration from the person making the deposit waiving the benefits of the Foreign Investment Contract with respect to the deposited common shares.

Access to the Formal Exchange Market under any of the circumstances described above is not automatic. Pursuant to former Chapter XXVI, such access required approval of the Central Bank of Chile based on a request presented through a banking institution established in Chile. The Foreign Investment Contract provides that if the Central Bank of Chile has not acted on the request within seven banking days, the request is deemed approved.

Under current Chilean law, the Foreign Investment Contract cannot be changed unilaterally by the Central Bank of Chile. We cannot guarantee, however, that additional Chilean restrictions applicable to the holders of ADRs, the disposition of the common shares underlying ADSs or the repatriation of the proceeds from an acquisition, a disposition or a dividend payment, will not be imposed or required in the future, nor could we make an assessment as to the duration or impact, were any such restrictions to be imposed or required. On May 10, 2007, the Council of the Central Bank of Chile agreed to grant the Chilean companies that increased their capital stock between the date of the agreement and August 31, 2007 the option to request, on a one-time only basis, the application of Chapter XXVI to those shares issued and actually paid before August 31, 2008 (assuming prior fulfillment of the requirements of the Central Bank of Chile).

On May 10, 2007, the Board of the Central Bank of Chile resolved to interpret the regulations regarding the former Chapter XXVI in connection with the access granted to the Formal Exchange Market. These regulations allowed entities that carry out capital increases by means of the issuance of cash shares before August 31, 2007 to apply the aforementioned regulation to their capital increases, but only once and only if those shares can be fully subscribed and paid by August 31, 2008, among other conditions. Consequently, capital increases carried out after August 31, 2007 will have no guaranteed access to the Formal Exchange Market. Furthermore, there is no assurance that (i) additional Chilean restrictions may be inapplicable to the holders of ADRs, (ii) the disposition of underlying shares or the repatriation of the proceeds from such disposition will be subject to restrictions in the future, and (iii) we cannot assess the duration or impact of such restrictions if imposed. Furthermore, the Central Bank of Chile interpreted in December 9, 2004, that new shares issued by Chilean banking institutions in connection with a merger of an issuer of ADSs that has previously executed a Foreign Investment Contract with the Central Bank of Chile with another company, are not covered by the terms of such Foreign Investment Contract. The Central Bank of Chile granted to Chilean banking institutions only and for a term of 90-days from December 9, 2004, the option to subject to the Foreign Investment Contract any shares issued as a result of a merger after the execution of such contract.

Therefore, any shares to be issued by LANLATAM Airlines Group pursuant to the exchange offer and the mergers willwould not be covered by the Foreign Investment Contract. Based on the foregoing, and in order for all ADS to be subject to the same exchange control regime, LAN’sLATAM Airlines Group’s Board of Directors has resolved to enter into a termination agreement with respect to the Foreign Investment Contract. On October 17, 2012 the Central Bank of Chile, the depositary and LATAM Airlines Group entered into a termination agreement in respect of the Foreign Investment Contract. ADR holders will bewere notified about this termination in accordance to Section 16 of the depositary agreement. See item 3. “D Risks Relating to Exchange Offer and Mergers involving TAM S.A.” for a description of the exchange offer and the mergers.

Upon termination of the Foreign Investment Contract, the ADR program will beis governed by Chapter XIV of the Compendium on “Regulations applicable to Credits, Deposits, Investments and Capital Contributions from Abroad”.Abroad.” According to Chapter XIV, the establishment of an ADR program is regarded as an ordinary foreign investment, and it is not necessary to seek the Central Bank of Chile’s prior approval in order to establish an ADR facility. The establishment of an ADR facility only requires that the Central Bank of Chile be informed of the transaction, and that the foreign currency transactions related thereby be conducted through the Formal Exchange Market.

Investment in Our Shares and ADRs after the mergersbusiness combination with TAM

InvestmentsAs a result of the merger with TAM, investments made in shares of our common stock after the mergers will beare subject to the following requirements:

 

any foreign investor acquiring shares of our common stock who brought funds into Chile for that purpose must bring those funds through an entity participating in the Formal Exchange Market;

 

any foreign investor acquiring shares of our common stock to be converted into ADSs or deposited into an ADR program who brought funds into Chile for that purpose must bring those funds through an entity participating in the Formal Exchange Market;

 

in both cases, the entity of the Formal Exchange Market through which the funds are brought into Chile must report such investment to the Central Bank of Chile;

 

all remittances of funds from Chile to the foreign investor upon the sale of the acquired shares of our common stock or from dividends or other distributions made in connection therewith must be made through the Formal Exchange Market;

 

all remittances of funds from Chile to the foreign investor upon the sale of shares underlying ADSs or from dividends or other distributions made in connection therewith must be made through the Formal Exchange Market; and

 

all remittances of funds made to the foreign investor must be reported to the Central Bank of Chile by the intervening entity of the Formal Exchange Market.

When funds are brought into Chile for a purpose other than to acquire shares to convert them into ADSs or deposit them into an ADR program and subsequently such funds are used to acquire shares to be converted into ADSs or deposited into an ADR program such investment must be reported to the Central Bank of Chile by the custodian within 10 days following the end of each month within which the custodian is obligated to deliver periodic reports to the Central Bank of Chile.

When funds to acquire shares of our common stock or to acquire shares to convert them into ADSs or deposit them into an ADR program are received by us abroad (i.e., outside of Chile), such investment must be reported to the Central Bank of Chile directly by the foreign investor or by an entity participating in the Formal Exchange Market within ten days following the end of the month in which the investment was made.

All payments in foreign currency in connection with our shares of common stock or ADSs made from Chile through the Formal Exchange Market must be reported to the Central Bank of Chile by the entity participating in the transaction. In the event there are payments made outside of Chile, the foreign investor must provide the relevant information to the Central Bank of Chile directly or through an entity of the Formal Exchange Market within the first ten calendar days of the month following the date on which the payment was made.

There can be no assurance that additional Chilean restrictions applicable to the holders of ADSs, the disposition of shares of our common shares underlying ADSs or the conversion or repatriation of the proceeds from such disposition will not be imposed in the future, nor can we assess the duration or impact of such restriction if imposed.

This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to Chapter XIV of the Central Bank of Chile’s Foreign Exchange Regulations, a copy of which is available in Spanish and English versions at the Central Bank’s website at www.bcentral.cl.

Voting Rights

Holders of our ADSs, which represent common shares, may instruct the depositary to vote the shares underlying their ADRs. If we ask holders for instructions, the depositary will notify such holders of the upcoming vote and

arrange to deliver our voting materials to such holders. The materials will describe the matters to be voted on and explain how holders may instruct the depositary to vote the shares or other deposited securities underlying their ADSs as they direct by a specified date. For instructions to be valid, the depositary must receive them on or before the date specified as “Vote Cut-Off Date.” The depositary will try, as far as practical, subject to Chilean law and the provisions of our by-laws, to vote or to have its agents vote the shares or other deposited securities as holders instruct. Otherwise, holders will not be able to exercise their right to vote unless they withdraw the shares. However, holders may not know about the meeting far enough in advance to withdraw the shares. We will use our best efforts to request that the depositary notify holders of upcoming votes and ask for their instructions.

If the depositary does not receive voting instructions from a holder by the specified date, it will consider such holder to have authorized and directed it to give a discretionary proxy to a person designated by our board of directors to vote the number of deposited securities represented by such holder’s ADSs. The depositary will give a discretionary proxy in those circumstances to vote on all questions to be voted upon unless we notify the depositary that:

 

we do not wish to receive a discretionary proxy;

 

we think there is substantial shareholder opposition to the particular question; or

 

we think the particular question would have an adverse impact on our shareholders.

The depositary will only vote or attempt to vote as such holder instructs or as described above.

We cannot assure holders that they receive the voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote their shares. This means that holders may not be able to exercise their right to vote and there may be nothing they can do if their shares are not voted as they requested.

Exchange Rates

Prior to 1989, Chilean law permitted the purchase and sale of foreign exchange only in those cases explicitly authorized by the Central Bank of Chile. The Central Bank Act liberalized the rules that govern the ability to buy and sell foreign currency. The Central Bank Act empowers the Central Bank of Chile to determine that certain purchases and sales of foreign currency specified by law must be carried out exclusively in the Formal Exchange Market, which is made up of the banks and other entities authorized by the Central Bank of Chile. All payments and distributions with respect to the ADSs must be conducted exclusively in the Formal Exchange Market.

For purposes of the operation of the Formal Exchange Market, the Central Bank of Chile sets a reference exchange rate (dólar acuerdo). The Central Bank of Chile resets the reference exchange rate monthly, taking internal and external inflation into account, and adjusts the reference exchange rate daily to reflect variations in parities between the Chilean peso, the U.S. dollar, the Japanese yen and the European euro.

The observed exchange rate (dólar observado) is the average exchange rate at which transactions were actually carried out in the Formal Exchange Market on a particular day, as certified by the Central Bank of Chile on the next banking day.

Prior to September 3, 1999, the Central Bank of Chile was authorized to buy or sell dollars in the Formal Exchange Market to maintain the observed exchange rate within a specified range above or below the reference exchange rate. On September 3, 1999, the Central Bank of Chile eliminated the exchange band. As a result, the Central Bank of Chile may buy and sell foreign exchange in the Formal Exchange Market in order to maintain the observed exchange rate at a level the Central Bank of Chile determines.

Purchases and sales of foreign exchange may be effected outside the Formal Exchange Market through the Informal Exchange Market (Mercado Cambiario Informal) established by the Central Bank in 1990. There are no limits on the extent to which the rate of exchange in the Informal Exchange Market can fluctuate above or below the observed exchange rate.

Although our results of operations have not been significantly affected by fluctuations in the exchange rates between the peso and the U.S. dollar because our functional currency is the U.S. dollar, we are exposed to foreign exchange losses and gains due to exchange rate fluctuations. Even though the majority of our revenues are denominated in or pegged to the U.S. dollar, the Chilean government’s economic policies affecting foreign exchange and future fluctuations in the value of the peso against the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our results of operations and an investor’s return on an investment in ADSs.

E. Taxation

Chilean Tax

The following discussion relates to Chilean income tax laws presently in force, including Ruling No. 324 of January 29, 1990 of the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (“Chilean IRS”) and other applicable regulations and rulings, all of which are subject to change. The discussion summarizes the principal Chilean income tax consequences of an investment in the ADSs or common shares by a person who is neither domiciled in, nor a resident of, Chile or by a legal entity that is not organized under the laws of Chile and does not have a branch or a permanent establishment located in Chile (such an individual or entity is referred to herein as a Foreign Holder). For purposes of Chilean tax law, an individual holder is a resident of Chile if such person has resided in Chile for more than six consecutive months in one calendar year or for a total of six months, whether consecutive or not, in two consecutive tax years. In addition, an individual is considered domiciled in Chile in case he or she resides in Chile with the actual or presumptive intent of staying in the country. The discussion is not intended as tax advice to any particular investor, which can be rendered only in light of that investor’s particular tax situation.

Under Chilean law, provisions contained in statutes such as tax rates applicable to foreign investors, the computation of taxable income for Chilean purposes and the manner in which Chilean taxes are imposed and collected may only be amended by another statute. In addition, the Chilean tax authorities enact rulings and regulations of either general or specific application and interpret the provisions of Chilean tax law. Chilean tax may not be assessed retroactively against taxpayers who act in good faith relying on such rulings, regulations and

interpretations, but Chilean tax authorities may change these rulings, regulations and interpretations prospectively. On February 4, 2010, representatives of the governments of the United States and Chile signed an income tax treaty. The new treaty will have to be approved by the U.S. Senate.

Cash Dividends and Other Distributions

Cash dividends we pay with respect to the ADSs or common shares held by a Foreign Holder will be subject to a 35% Chilean withholding tax, which we withhold and pay over to the Chilean tax authorities and which we refer to as the Withholding Tax. A credit against the Withholding Tax is available based on the level of corporate income tax we actually paid on the income to be distributed (referred to herein as the First Category Tax); however, this credit does not reduce the Withholding Tax on a one-for-one basis because it also increases the base on which the Withholding Tax is imposed. If we register net income but taxable losses, no credit against the Withholding Tax will be available. In addition, if we distribute less than all of our distributable income, the credit for First Category Tax we pay is proportionately reduced. In 2011 the First Category Tax rate was 20%.,reduced.Last year, law 20.630 modified and 18.5% for fiscal year 2012. From 2013 onwards,fixed the rate provisional of First Category Tax will revert backthe first category tax from 18.5% to 17%. 20% from 2012 onwards.

In general, the example below illustrates the effective Withholding Tax burden on a cash dividend received by a Foreign Holder, assuming a Withholding Tax rate of 35%, ana First Category Tax rate of 17%, and a distribution of 30% of the consolidated net income of the Company after payment of the First Category Tax:

 

The Company’s taxable income

   100.00  

First Category Tax (17%(20% of Ch$100)

   (1720

Net distributable income

   83.0080.00  

Dividend distributed (30% of net distributable income)

   24.924  

First category increase

   5.16.00  

Withholding Tax (35% of the sum of Ch$24.924 dividend plus Ch$5.16 First Category Tax paid)

   (10.5

Credit for 17%20% of First Category Tax

   5.16.00  

Net tax withheld

   (5.44.5

Net dividend received

   19.5  

Effective dividend withholding rate

   21.6918.75

In general, the effective dividend Withholding Tax rate, after giving effect to the credit for the First Category Tax, can be calculated using the following formula:

(Withholding Tax rate) – (First Category Tax effective rate)

1 – (First Category Tax effective rate)

Under Chilean income tax law, dividends generally are assumed to have been paid out of our oldest retained profits for purposes of determining the level of First Category Tax that we paid. The effective rate of Withholding Tax to be imposed on dividends we pay will vary depending upon the amount of First Category Tax we paid (if any) on the earnings to which the dividends are attributed, according to the Company’s Taxable Profit Fund. The Effective Withholding Tax rate for dividends attributed to earnings from 1991 until 2001, for which the First Category Tax rate was 15%, which resultresults in aan effective rate of 23.5%. For 2002, the First Category Tax rate was 16.0%, which results in an effective rate of 22.62%. In 2003, the First Category Tax rate was 16.5%, which results in an effective rate of 22.16%, from 2004 until 2010, the First Category Tax rate was 17%, which results in an effective rate of Withholding Tax of 21.69%, In 2011 the First category Tax rate was 20%, which results in aan effective rate of Withholding Tax of 18,75%18.75%. In 2012 the First category Tax rate will be 18,5%was 20%, which results in aan effective rate of Withholding Tax of 20,25%18.75%. From 2013 onwards the First category Tax rate will be 17%20%, which results in aan effective rate of Withholding Tax of 21,69%18.75%,

For dividends attributable to our profits during years when the First Category Tax was 10% (before 1991), the effective rate will be 27.8%. However, whether the First Category Tax is 10%, 15%, 16%, 16.5% or 17%, the effective overall combined tax rate imposed on our distributed profits will be 35%. In the event that profits from previous years are not sufficient to cover a particular dividend, and the dividend is attributable to the current year, we will generally withhold tax from the dividend at the full 35% rate. If as of December 31 of the year in which the dividend is paid, the withholding is determined to be excessive taking into account First Category Tax, holders may file for a refund.

Dividend distributions made in property would be subject to the same Chilean tax rules as cash dividends based on the fair market value of such property. Stock dividends and the distribution of preemptive rights are not subject to Chilean taxation.

Capital Gains

Gain from the sale or other disposition by a Foreign Holder of ADRs evidencing ADSs outside Chile will not be subject to Chilean taxation. The deposit and withdrawal of common shares in exchange for ADRs will not be subject to any Chilean taxes.

Gain recognized on a sale or disposition of common shares (as distinguished from sales or exchanges of ADRs evidencing ADSs representing such common shares) may be subject to both the First Category Tax and the Withholding Tax (the former being creditable against the latter) if:

 

the Foreign Holder has held the common shares for less than one year since exchanging ADSs for the Shares;

 

the Foreign Holder acquired and disposed of the common shares in the ordinary course of its business or as a habitual trader of shares; or

 

the Foreign Holder and the purchaser of the common shares are “related parties” or has an interest in the latter within the meaning of Article 17, Number 8, of the Chilean Income Tax Law.

In all other cases, gain on the disposition of common shares will be subject only to a flat capital gains tax which is assessed at the same rate as the First Category Tax as sole income tax (currently imposed at a rate(18.5% or 20% for 2011, 18.5% forin 2012, and 17% from 2013 onwards)

onwards 20%) and no withholding tax will apply. The sale of shares of common stock by a Foreign Holder to an individual or entity resident or domiciled in Chile is subject to a provisional withholding. Such a provisional withholding will be equal to (i) 5% of the total (sale price) amount, without any deduction, paid to, credited to, account for, put at the disposal of, or corresponding to, the Foreign Holder if the transaction is subject to the First Category Tax, as a sole tax. Unless the gain subject to taxation can be determined, case in which the withholding is equal to 17%, 20% or 18,5%18.5% (this last rate if the sale was between January to August 2012) , whichever is applicable, on the gain, or (ii) 20% of the total amount (the sale price without any deduction), paid to, credited to, account for, put at the disposal of, or corresponding to, the Foreign Holder if the transaction is subject to the general tax regime, that is, the First Category Tax, and the Withholding Tax, with a credit of the First Category Tax already paid. The Foreign Holder would be entitled to request a tax refund for any amounts withheld in excess of the taxes actually due, in April of the following year upon filing its corresponding tax return. Gain recognized in the transfer of common shares that have a high presence in the stock exchange, however, is not subject to capital gains tax in Chile, provided that the common shares are transferred in a local stock exchange, in other authorized stock exchanges or within the process of a public tender of common shares governed by the Securities Market Law.

Chile’s Internal Revenue Service Ruling Nº224 (issued on January 30, 2008) confirmed that capital gains stemming from the sale of shares with high stock-market presence acquired through the exchange of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) for shares is not subject to capital gains tax in Chile. Such exemption is applicable provided that the purchase of such ADR certificates has been made at stock exchanges duly authorized by SVS (which includes the New York Stock Exchange).

The common shares must also have been acquired either in a stock exchange, within the process of a public tender of common shares governed by the Securities Market Law, in an initial public offer of common shares resulting from the formation of a corporation or a capital increase of the same, or in an exchange of convertible bonds. Shares are considered to have a high presence in the stock exchange when they:

 

are registered in the Securities Registry;

 

are registered in a Chilean Stock exchange; and

have an adjusted presence equal to or above 25%.

To calculate the adjusted presence of a particular share, the aforementioned regulation first requires a determination of the number of days in which the operations regarding the stock exceeded, in Chilean pesos, the equivalent of 2001,000 UF (US$9,21947,581 as of March 28, 2012) within the previous 180 business days of the stock market. That number must then be divided by 180, multiplied by 100, and expressed in a percentage value. This tax regime does not apply if the transaction involves an amount of shares that would allow the acquirer to take control of the publicly traded corporation, in which case the ordinary tax regime referred to in the previous paragraph will apply, unless the transfer is part of a tender offer governed by the Securities Market Law or the transfer is done on a Chilean stock exchange, without substantially exceeding the market price.

Capital gains obtained in the sale of shares that are publicly traded and have a high presence in a stock exchange are also exempt from capital gains tax in Chile when the sale is made by “foreign institutional investors” such as mutual funds and pension funds, provided that the sale is made in a stock exchange or in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Market Law, or in any other form authorized by the SVS. To qualify as a foreign institutional investor, an entity must be formed outside of Chile, not have a domicile in Chile, and must be at least one of the following:

 

a fund that offers its common shares or quotas publicly in a country with investment grade public debt, according to a classification performed by an international risk classification entity registered with the SVS;

 

a fund registered with a regulatory agency or authority from a country with investment grade public debt, according to a classification performed by an international risk classification entity registered with the SVS, provided that its investments in Chile constitute less than 30% of the share value of the fund, including deeds issued abroad representing Chilean securities, such as ADRs of Chilean companies;

a fund whose investments in Chile represent less than 30% of the share value of the fund, including deeds issued abroad representing Chilean securities, such as ADRs of Chilean companies, provided that not more than 10% of the share value of the fund is directly or indirectly owned by Chilean residents;

 

a pension fund that is formed exclusively by natural persons that receive pensions out of an accumulated capital in the fund;

 

a Foreign Capital Investment Fund, as defined in Law No. 18,657, in which case all quota holders shall be Chilean residents or domestic institutional investors; or

 

any other foreign institutional investor that complies with the requirements set forth in general regulations for each category of investor or prior information from the SVS and the Chilean IRS.

The foreign institutional investor must not directly or indirectly participate in the control of the corporations issuing the shares it invests in, nor possess or participate in 10% or more of the capital or the profits of such corporations.

Another requirement for the exemption is that the foreign institutional investor must execute a written contract with a bank or a stock broker incorporated in Chile. In this contract, the bank or stock broker must undertake to execute purchase and sale orders, verify the applicability of the tax exemption or tax withholding and inform the Chilean IRS of the investors it works with and the transactions it performs. Finally, the foreign institutional investor must register with the Chilean IRS by means of a sworn statement issued by such bank or stock broker.

The tax basis of common shares received in exchange for ADRs will be the acquisition value of the common shares on the date of exchange duly adjusted for local inflation. The valuation procedure set forth in the deposit agreement, which values common shares which are being exchanged at the highest price at which they trade on the SSE on the date of the exchange, will determine the acquisition value for this purpose. Consequently, the surrender of ADRs for common shares and the immediate sale of the common shares for the value established under the

Deposit Agreement will not generate a capital gain subject to taxation in Chile, provided that the sale of the common shares is made on the same date on which the exchange of ADRs for common shares is recorded, or if the price of the common shares at the exchange date, as determined above, is higher than the price at which the common shares are sold.

The exercise of preemptive rights relating to the common shares will not be subject to Chilean taxation. Any gain on the sale of preemptive rights relating to the common shares will be subject to both the First Category Tax and the Withholding Tax (the former being creditable against the latter).

Other Chilean Taxes

There are no Chilean inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of ADSs by a Foreign Holder, but such taxes generally will apply to the transfer at death or by gift of the common shares by a Foreign Holder. There are no Chilean stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by Foreign Holders of ADSs or common shares.

Withholding Tax Certificates

Upon request, we will provide to Foreign Holders appropriate documentation evidencing the payment of the Withholding Tax (net of the applicable First Category Tax).

United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant toThis section describes the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common shares and ADSs by a beneficial owner that is: (i) an individual citizen or resident of thematerial United States; (ii) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States any state thereof or the District of Columbia; (iii) a trust if (a) a United States court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (b) it has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person or (iv) an estate that is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its income regardless of its source. For purposes of this discussion, we refer to these owners of common shares and ADSs as U.S. Holders.

This summary is not a comprehensive discussion of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to your decision to purchase ADSs or common shares. In particular, this discussion is directed only to U.S. Holders that will hold ADSs or common shares as capital assets and it does not address any special U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be applicable to a U.S. Holders thatholder (as defined below) of owning common shares or ADSs. It applies to you only if you hold your common shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. This section does not apply to you if you are a member of a special class of holders subject to special treatment underrules, including:

a dealer in securities,

a trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for securities holdings,

a tax-exempt organization,

a life insurance company,

a person liable for alternative minimum tax,

a person that actually or constructively owns 10% or more of our voting stock,

a person that holds common shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction,

a person that purchases or sells common shares or ADSs as part of a wash sale for tax purposes, or

a U.S. holder (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.

This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), including, but not limited to banks or other financial institutions, regulated investment companies, entities that are treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as partnerships or other pass-through entities, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, brokers or dealers in securities or foreign currencies, traders in securities electing to mark to market, holders that own or are treated as owning 10% or more of our voting common stock, holders that acquired ADSs or common shares pursuant to the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation, persons holding ADSs or common shares as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or a straddle, or persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. If a partnership holds ADSs or common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A prospective investor who is a partner of a partnership holding our ADSs or common shares should consult its own tax advisor.

The discussion below is based upon the provisions of the Code, its legislative history, existing and proposed U.S. treasury regulations, published rulings and court decisions, all as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be repealed, revoked or modified (with possiblecurrently in effect. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive effect) so as to result in U.S. federalbasis. There is currently no comprehensive income tax consequences different from those discussed below.treaty between the United States and the Republic of Chile. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of the depositaryDepositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreements relating to the ADRsDeposit Agreement and any related agreementsagreement will be performed in accordance with theirits terms.

If a partnership holds the common shares or ADSs, the United States federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the tax treatment of the partnership. A partner in a partnership holding the common shares or ADSs should consult its tax advisor with regard to the United States federal income tax treatment of an investment in the common shares or ADSs.

You are a U.S. holder if you are a beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs and you are:

a citizen or resident of the United States,

a domestic corporation,

an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source, or

a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more United States persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the United States federal, state and local and the Chilean and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of common shares and ADSs in your particular circumstances.

HOLDERS AND/OR PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OFADSs

In general, and taking into account the earlier assumptions, for United States federal income tax purposes, if you hold ADRs evidencing ADSs, OR COMMON SHARES SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISERS AS TO THE CHILEAN, U.S. FEDERAL INCOME OR OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF ADSs OR COMMON SHARES, INCLUDING, IN PARTICULAR, THE EFFECT OF ANY NON-U.S., STATE OR LOCAL TAX LAWS.

The following summary assumes that ADSs andyou will be treated as the owner of the common shares arerepresented by those ADRs. Exchanges of common shares for ADRs, and ADRs for common shares, generally will not stockbe subject to United States federal income tax.

Taxation of aDividends

Under the United States federal income tax laws, and subject to the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Based on our audited financial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2010 or 2011 taxable year. In addition, based on our audited financial statements and our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and relevant market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC for our 2012 taxable year. However, there can be no assurance in this regard because the PFIC determination is made annually and is based on the portion of our assets and income that is characterized as passive under the PFIC rules.

ADRs

In general,rules discussed below, if you are a U.S. Holderholder, the gross amount of ADRs evidencing our ADSs, you will be treated, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as the beneficial owner of the underlying common shares that are represented by those ADSs and evidenced by those ADRs.

Taxation of Dividends

Distributions of cash or property (other than common stock, if any distributed pro rata to all of our shareholders, including holders of ADSs) paiddividend we pay out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S.United States federal income tax purposes) with respectis subject to ADSs or common shares, including the net amount of the Chilean Withholding Tax withheld on the distribution (after taking into account the credit for the First Category Tax), will be included in a U.S. holder’s gross income as ordinary income on the date on which you receive the dividends, in the case of common shares, or the date the depositary receives the dividends, in the case of common shares represented by ADSs, and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code. Dividends paid in Chilean pesos generally will be included in a U.S. holder’s gross income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the U.S. Holder receives the dividends, in the case of common shares, or the date the depositary receives the dividends, in the case of common shares represented by ADSs. U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their own tax advisers regarding the treatment of foreign currency gain or loss, if any, on any Chilean pesos received which are converted into U.S. dollars after they are received. To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S.United States federal income tax purposes, such excess amounts will be treated first as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the ADSs or common shares and, thereafter, as capital gain.taxation.

We do not maintain calculations of earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should assume that any distribution made by us (other than common stock distributed pro rata to all our shareholders, as discussed above) will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received byIf you are a noncorporate U.S. Holder in taxable years before January 1, 2013 with respect toholder, dividends paid on the ADSs that constitute qualified dividend income will be subjecttaxable to taxationyou at a maximum rate of 15%the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains if you hold the dividends are “qualified dividends.”ADSs for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet other holding period requirements. Dividends paid on the ADSs will be treated as qualified dividendsdividend income if:

 

the ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States; and

we were not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a PFIC.

The ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and will qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States so long as they are so listed. Because our common shares are not expected to be listed on any U.S.United States securities market, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received with respect to our common shares (including dividends received by a noncorporate U.S. Holder in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013)holder) will be subject to taxation at ordinary income tax rates.

You must include any Chilean tax withheld from the dividend payment in this gross amount even though you do not in fact receive it. The dividend is taxable to you when you, in the case of common shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, receive the dividend, actually or constructively. The dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to United States corporations in respect of dividends received from other United States corporations. The amount of the dividend distribution that you must include in your income as a U.S. holder will be the U.S. dollar value of the Chilean pesos payments made, determined at the spot Chilean pesos/U.S. dollar rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date you include the dividend payment in income to the date you convert the payment into U.S. dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. The gain or loss generally will be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for United States federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of your basis in the common shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain. However, we do not expect to calculate earnings and profits in accordance with United States federal income tax principles. Accordingly, you should expect to generally treat distributions we make as dividends.

Subject to generally applicable limitations and conditions under the Code, Chilean Withholding Tax withheld from dividendsand paid over to the Chilean tax authorities (after taking into account the credit for the First Category Tax, when it is available) will be treated as a foreign source income tax eligible for creditcreditable or deductible against a U.S. Holder’s U.S.your United States federal income tax liability or for deductionliability. Special rules apply in computing such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal taxable income. Ifdetermining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the preferential tax rates. To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is available to you under Chilean law, as is the case if the amount of Chilean Withholding Tax initially withheld from a dividend is determined to be excessive however (asas described above under “—Taxation—Chilean Taxation—Tax—Cash Dividends and Other Distributions”),Distributions,” the excessamount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be creditableeligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability.

Dividends will generally be income from sources outside the United States and will, depending on your circumstances, be either “passive” or deductible. For“general” income for purposes of calculatingcomputing the foreign tax credit dividends paid on the common shares will generally constitute foreign source “passive income.” U.S. Holders are not allowed foreign tax credits for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in securities and may not be allowed foreign tax credits in respect of arrangements in which their expected economic profit is insubstantial. U.S. Holders are encouragedallowable to consult their tax advisers with regard to the availability of foreign tax credits and the application of the foreign tax credit limitations in light of their particular circumstances.

U.S. Holders that receive distributions of additional common shares or rights to subscribe for common shares as part of a pro rata distribution to all our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax in respect of the distributions.you.

Taxation of Capital Gains or Losses

IfSubject to the PFIC rules discussed below, if you are a U.S. Holder, gainholder and you sell or loss realized on the sale, exchange or other taxable dispositionotherwise dispose of ADSs oryour common shares generallyor ADSs, you will berecognize capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount that you realize and generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the ADSs oryour tax basis, determined in U.S. dollars, in your common shares have beenor ADSs. Capital gain of a noncorporate U.S. holder is generally taxed at preferential rates where the property is held for more than one year. Long-term capital gain realized by a noncorporate U.S. Holder generally is subject to preferential tax rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations.

Any gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on such a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition will generally be treated as U.S. source gainincome or loss from sources within the United States for U.S. foreign tax credit limitation purposes. Accordingly, in the case

PFIC Rules

We believe that commons shares and ADSs should not be treated as stock of a disposition of common shares (which, unlike a disposition of ADSs, could be taxable in Chile), a U.S. Holder may not be able to use the foreign tax credit arising from any Chilean tax imposed on the disposition of the common shares (see “—Taxation—Chilean Taxation—Capital Gains”) unless such credit can be applied (subject to applicable limitations) against tax due on other income treated as derived from foreign sources, in the appropriate income category. The calculation and availability of foreign tax credits and, in the case of a U.S. Holder that elects to deduct foreign income taxes, the availability of deductions, involves the application of complex rules that depend on a U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances. U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors with regard to the availability of foreign tax credits and the application of the foreign tax credit limitations in light of their particular situation.

Deposits and withdrawals of common shares by U.S. Holders in exchangePFIC for ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S.United States federal income tax purposes.purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If we were to be treated as a PFIC, unless you elect to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to your common shares or ADSs, gain realized on the sale or other disposition of your commons shares or ADSs would in general not be treated as capital gain. Instead, if you are a U.S. holder, you would be treated as if you had realized such gain and certain “excess distributions” ratably over your holding period for the commons shares or ADSs and would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year. With certain exceptions, your commons shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during your holding period in your commons shares or ADSs. Dividends that you receive from us will not be eligible for the special tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.

F. Dividends and Paying Agents

Not applicable.

G. Statement by Experts

Not applicable.

H. Documents on Display

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act, as amended. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F and other information with the SEC. These materials, including this annual report and the exhibits hereto, may be inspected and copied at the SEC’s public reference rooms in Washington, D.C. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. In addition, some of our SEC filings, including those filed on and after February 19, 2002, are also available to the public through the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov. www.sec.gov.

As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to the same disclosure requirements as a domestic U.S. registrant under the Exchange Act. For example, we are not required to prepare and issue quarterly reports. However, we furnish our shareholders with annual reports containing financial statements audited by our independent auditors and make available to our shareholders quarterly reports containing unaudited financial data for the first three quarters of each fiscal year. We file such quarterly reports with the SEC within two months of each quarter of our fiscal year, and we file annual reports on Form 20-F within the time period required by the SEC, which is currently six months from December 31, the end of our fiscal year.

I. Subsidiary Information

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 11.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

General

Given the nature of its business, LANLATAM is exposed mainly to three types of market risks:risk:

 

Jet fuel price fluctuations;

 

Interest rate fluctuations; and

 

Exchange rate fluctuations.

TheManagement assesses the level of our exposure to these risks is periodically assessed to determine the extent to which LANwe should hedge against them and the most effective mechanisms to implement the hedge. LANLATAM purchases derivative instruments in foreign markets to offset market risk exposure, typically utilizing a mixture of call options, collar structures and fixed price swaps agreements. LANLATAM does not enter into or hold derivative contracts for trading purposes.

Risk of Fluctuations in Jet Fuel Prices

Individually, LAN and TAM forecasted fuel consumption for 2012 of 608.9 million and 676.6 million gallons, respectively. Since the combination of their business operations, LATAM has been managing the fuel hedging program for both LAN and TAM, based on an approved policy. This policy aims to hedge approximately 20-60% of our aggregate fuel consumption, using swaps, calls and collars for the expected fuel consumption from 12-24 months.

Jet fuel price fluctuations are largely dependent on supply and demand for crude oil, OPEC decisions, refinery capacities, stock levels of crude oil and geopolitical factors. In order to minimize the risk of jet fuel price fluctuations, LANLATAM hedges against such risk using derivative instruments.

Because jet fuel is not traded in organized futures exchanges, there are limited options to hedge against jet fuel price fluctuations. However, LAN deemsLATAM considers financial derivative instruments in other commodities such as crude oil or heating oil, to be useful for decreasing its exposure to jet fuel price increases.

LANLATAM uses swaps, calls and collars to hedge against fuel prices fluctuations. Swap contracts allow us to eliminate the volatility risk by fixing the price. In a typical swap contract, LANLATAM is compensated if the market price is above the fixed price at certain predetermined dates, or needs toand must make disbursements if the market price is below the fixed price inat those dates. Call options give us protection against rise in prices. Call option are only exercised when the market price is above the predetermined strike price thus providing LANLATAM with protection with no downside risk. Collars are a combination of call and put options that limit the range of possible positive or negative outcomes to a specific price range. Above the predetermined ceiling price, LANLATAM is compensated for the difference between the market price and the ceiling price. For any price below the predetermined floor price, LANLATAM has to disburse the difference between the market price and the floor price.

We aremay be exposed to fuel hedging transaction losses if theour counterparties default. To manage this credit risk, we select counterparties based on their credit ratings and monitor our relative market position on a daily basis. For more information see “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Operations and the Airline Industry—Our operations are subject to fluctuations in the supply and cost of jet fuel, which could materiallynegatively impact our business...

During 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010 we entered into a mix of swaps, calls, zero cost collars, three-way collars and collars option contracts on WTI, BRENT and HEATING OIL prices with investment banks and other financial entities for notional fuel purchases. In 2011, 397.8 million gallons were purchased, which represented 69.8%Details of our total annualthe fuel consumption; in 2010, 282.7 million gallons were purchased, which represented 55.5% of our fuel consumption; and in 2009, 205.2 million gallons were purchased, which represented 45.7% of our total fuel consumption. The combined result of these contracts was a gain of US$39.9 million in 2011, compared to a gain of US$1 million in 2010 and a loss of US$128.7 million in 2009. hedging program are shown below:

   LATAM Fuel Hedging
Year ended December 31,
 
    2012
LATAM(1)
  2011
LAN
  2010
LAN
 
   (millions of US$) 

Gallons Purchased

   598.4    397.8    282.7  

% Total Annual Fuel Consumption

   46.6  69.8  55.5

Combined Result of Hedges (in US$)

   –1.8    +39.9    +1.0  

(1)Includes TAM’s fuel hedging from June 23, 2012.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the fair value of our outstanding fuel related derivative contracts was estimated to be US$30.69.9 million (asset).

Fair value by quarter of LATAM’s fuel related hedges, as of December 31, 2012

   Fair value by quarter, as of December 31, 2011
   1Q12  2Q12  3Q12  Total
   (in US$ millions)
Fair value of outstanding fuel derivative contracts  10.5  12.5  7.6  30.6

1Q13

   

2Q13

   

3Q13

   

4Q13

   

1Q14

   

2Q14

   

Total

 
(millions of US$) 
 –3.14    0.99    1.26    1.57    3.37     +0.42    9.91  

Gains and losses on the hedging contracts outlined above are recognized as a cost of sales in the income statement when the fuel subject to the hedge is consumed. Premiums paid related to fuel derivative contracts are recorded as prepaid expenses (current assets) and amortized overrecorded as an expense at the respectivetime the contract periods.expires.

Under IFRS, the fair value of the hedging derivatives is booked as a non-current asset or liability if the remaining maturity of the item is hedged is overfor more than 12 months, and as a current asset or liability if the remaining term of the item hedged isfor less than 12 months. The fair value of the derivative contracts is deferred within an equity reserve account. Please see Note 2.10 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Sensitivity analysis

In order to protect the Company from increases in fuel prices, a portion of the fuel consumption is hedged using a mixture of protective instruments (call, collars) and fixing instruments (swaps). To keep the Company competitive, a portion of the fuel consumption is not hedged, as a drop in fuel prices positively affects the Company through a reduction in costs.

As the current positions do not represent changes in cash flows but a variation in the exposure to the market value, the Company’s current hedge positions have no impact on income (theyincome; they are booked as cash flow hedge contracts, so a variation in fuel prices has an impact on the Company’s net equity).equity.

The following table shows the sensitivity analysis of the financial instruments reflectingour hedging contracts to reasonable changes in fuel prices and their effect on equity. The term used for the projection was December 31, 2012,June 30, 2014, the finallast maturity date of the lastour current fuel hedge contract.contracts. The calculations were made considering a parallel movement of US$5 per barrel in the curve of the WTI and BRENT crude futures benchmark price at the end of December 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009.

The Company seeks to reduce the risk of increases in fuel price in order to maintain its competitivity, therefore hedging instruments like swaps, options and collars are used to partially hedge against these fuel price fluctuations.2010.

 

   Position as of December 31 (effect on equity), 
WTI benchmark price  2011   2010   2009 
(US$ per barrel)  (millions of US$) 

+5

   +16.5     +16.7     +14.6  

-5

   -13.8     -15.7     -13.6  
   LATAM fuel price sensitivity (effect on equity)
Position as of December 31,
 
WTI or BRENT benchmark price  2012
LATAM
   2011
LAN
   2010
LAN
 
   (millions of US$ per barrel) 

+5

   +12.6     +16.5     +16.7  

–5

   –11.3     –13.8     –15.7  

During the periods presented, the Company has not recorded amounts for ineffectiveness in the consolidated income statement pursuant to IAS 39 (IFRS principles for recognizing and measuring financial instruments).

Given the fuel hedge structure as of December 31, 2011,2012, which considers a hedge-free portion, a vertical fall by US$5 in the WTI and BRENT benchmark price (the monthly daily average) for each month would have meant savings of approximately US$42.591.0 million in the cost of the Company’s total fuel consumption. A vertical increase by US$5 in the WTI and BRENT benchmark price (the monthly daily average) for each month would have meant an additional cost of approximately US$39.590.4 million of the Company’s total fuel consumption.

Risk of Fluctuations in Interest Rates

As of December 31, 2011, LAN’s debt amounted to2012, LATAM had US$3,5169,573 million in outstanding interest bearing loans. LANLATAM uses swaps and caps to reduce the impact of an increase of interest rates. AsFollowing the combination of LAN and TAM, LATAM is more exposed to fluctuations of interest rates (before giving effect to swaps), as more than half of TAM’s outstanding debt bears interest at a floating rate. Individually as of December 31, 2011, 82%2012, 44.2% of ourTAM’s outstanding debt is in the form of fixed rate loans, and 77.5% of LAN’s outstanding debt was effectively at fixed rate, either as fixed rate loans or variable rate loans hedged using a floating to fixed rate derivative instrument. On a combined basis, 62% of LATAM outstanding debt as of December 31, 2012 was effectively at fixed rate, either as fixed rate loans or variable rate loans hedged using a floating to fix rate derivative instrument.

Given the percentage of our outstandingLATAM’s interest bearing loans can be classified by: variable interest rate debt, thatfixed interest rate debt and interest rate hedged debt. LATAM’s variable interest rate debt amounts to US$3,598 million from which 78.2% is assigned to aircraft financing and 21.8% to non-aircraft financing. The fixed interest rate debt amounts to US$4,797 million from which 70.7% is assigned to aircraft financing and 29.2% to non-aircraft financing. The interest rate hedged debt amounts to US$1,179 million from which 94.9% is assigned to interest rate swaps and the instruments that5.1% to interest rate caps.

Since July 2001, we usehave entered into 31 swap contracts to hedge an increase in interest rates has no material impact on LAN’s costs.initial floating rate-exposure debt of US$1,321 million. Under an interest rate swap contract, given the case of decreases in interest rates, LANLATAM has to pay compensation equal to the difference between the fixed and floating rate times the outstanding debt under the specific contract. However, under such contracts the interest rate has a floor preventing LANLATAM from incurring major financial losses.

In May 2001, we entered into six swap contracts Under IFRS, the positive fair value of these interest rate swaps is reflected in order to hedge our floating rate-exposure on US$331 million of our debt. Pursuant to these contracts, we pay or receive, depending on the case, the difference between the agreed fixed ratebalance sheet as hedging assets and the floating rate, calculated onnegative fair value of these agreements is reflected as hedging liabilities. As of December 31, 2012, the notional amountfair value of each contract. In October 2005,all the Company entered into two interest rate swap contracts in orderswaps was estimated to hedge the LIBOR exposure of the financing of two Airbus A319 aircraft delivered in 2005.be US$157 million.

In July 2003,Since December 2002, we purchased four9 interest rate cap contracts for a total notional amount of US$127.7255 million. These caps are intended to limit the Company’s exposure arising from variable-rate debt. These contracts qualify as cash flow hedges with no ineffectiveness associated to them due to the fact that all critical terms of the debt and the caps match perfectly.are matched. As of December 31, 2011,2012, the fair value of these contracts has beenwas estimated atto be US$9.7 thousand.0.01 million.

The premiums paid on the cap contracts were allocated to individual caplets and recognized in the income statement throughout the term of each contract. Under IAS 39 these derivatives qualify as cash flow hedges even though some ineffectiveness exists as the notional amount over which some caps are calculated is different from the one used to determine the interest and lease payments on the aircraft. For IFRS purposes, there was no amount of ineffectiveness recorded in earnings because the change in fair value of the perfect hypothetical option was greater than the change in the fair value of the Company’s option.

In the first half of 2006, the Company also entered into ten fixed-floating interest rate swap contracts in order to hedge the variable interest payments on the unhedged portion of existing debt of approximately US$46.7 million. Additionally, in May 2006 the Company entered into thirty-two forward starting interest rate swap contracts in order to hedge the LIBOR exposure of the financing of thirty-two A320-Family Aircraft to be delivered between 2006 and 2009. Out of these thirty-two contracts, twenty-five were contracted directly with the debt provider, while the remaining seven swaps were contracted with a different institution. In 2009 all of the thirty-two aircraft were delivered to the Company. Out of the thirty-two abovementioned contracts, twenty-five were converted into fixed interest rate debt.

In June 2006 the Company entered into eleven forward starting interest rate swap contracts in order to hedge the LIBOR exposure of the financing of 11 Boeing 767-300 ER aircraft to be delivered between 2006 and 2009. All of those aircraft have already been delivered to the Company, and the corresponding swap and loan were restructured into fixed rate debt.

In August 2007 the Company entered into three forward starting interest rate swaps contracts in order to hedge the LIBOR exposure of the debt financing of three Boeing 767-300 ER aircraft to be delivered in 2009. This debt allows for conversion of the variable interest rate loan into fixed interest rate debt by capital markets financing after the arrival of the aircraft. As of December 31, 2011, the three aircraft had been delivered to the Company. The first aircraft was refinanced through a fixed interest rate bond issued in December 2009, the second was refinanced through a fixed interest rate bond issued in June 2010 and the third was refinanced through a fixed interest rate bond issued in April 2010. In September 2007, the Company entered into another three forward starting interest rate swaps contracts in order to hedge the LIBOR exposure of the financing of three Airbus A320-Family Aircraft to be delivered in 2010.

In June 2008, the Company entered into 14 forward starting interest rate swaps contracts in order to hedge the LIBOR exposure of the financing of 12 A320-Family Aircraft that were delivered in 2010 and 2011, two Boeing 767-300 aircraft that were delivered in 2011 and two Boeing 787-8 to be delivered in 2012.

As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of all the aforementioned interest rate swaps was estimated to be a negative US$159.4 million.

Under IFRS, the positive fair value of these interest rate swaps is reflected in the balance sheet as hedging assets and the negative fair value of these agreements is reflected as hedging liabilities.

The utilization of the aforementioned hedging instruments, combined with fixed interest rate financing for two Boeing 767-300 Four aircraft delivered in 2001, 17 Boeing 767-300 Passenger and Freighter aircraft delivered in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and 32 Airbus A320-Family Aircraft delivered in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009,financing has enabled the Company to have a predictable interest rate costs, reducing the cash volatility. As of December 2011,31 2012, the average interest rate of our entire outstanding interest-bearing long-term debt rate was 4.5%4.0%.

The following table summarizes our principal payment obligations on all of our interest-bearing long-term debt and capital leases as of December 31, 20112012 and the related average interest rates.rate for such debt. The average interest rates for U.S. dollar liabilities arerate has been calculated based on the prevailing interest rate on December 31, 20112012 for each loan.

 

   Principal payment obligations by year of expected maturity(1) 
   Average
interest
rate(2)
  2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   Thereafter
2017
 
   (in US$ millions) 

Liabilities

             

U.S. dollars

   4.5  509.7     840.6     342.2     323.0     317.7     1215.2  
   LATAM’s principal payment obligations by year of expected  maturity(1) 
   Average
interest  rate(2)
  2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018 and
thereafter
 
   (thousands of US$) 

Interest-bearing liabilities

   4.0  1,276     1,219     1,263     1,153     1,517     3,145  

 

(1) 

At cost.

(2) 

Average interest rate means the average prevailing interest rate on December 31, 20112012 on our debt after giving effect to hedging arrangements.

The following table shows the sensitivity of changes in financial obligationsour long-term interest bearing liabilities and capital leases that are not hedged against interest-rate variations. These changes are considered reasonably possible based on current market conditions.

 

   Position as of December 31 (effect on pre-tax  earnings) 
   2011   2010   2009 
   (in US$ millions) 

Increase (decrease) in Libor

      

+100 basis points

   -3.06     -1.18     -0.87  

-100 basis points

   +3.06     +1.18     +0.87  
   LATAM’s interest rate sensitivity
(effect on pre-tax  earnings)

Position as of December 31
 
   2012
LATAM
   2011
LAN
   2010
LAN
 
   (millions of US$) 

Increase (decrease) in LIBOR

      

+100 basis points

  33.69    3.06    1.18  

–100 basis points

   +33.69     +3.06     +1.18  

Changes in market conditions produce a change in the valuation of current financial instruments hedging against fluctuations in interest rates, causing an effect on the Company’s equity (because they are booked as cash-flow hedges). These changes are considered reasonably possible based on current market conditions. The calculations were made verticallyby increasing (decreasing) 100 basis points of the three-month Libor futures curve.

  Position as of December 31 (effect on equity)   LATAM’s interest rate sensitivity
(effect on equity)

Position as of December 31
 
  2011   2010   2009   2012
LATAM
   2011 LAN  2010
LAN
 
  (millions of US$)   (millions of US$) 

Increase (decrease) in three month Libor

      

Increase (decrease) in three month LIBOR

    

Future rates

          

+100 basis points

   +40.70     +42.39     +49.64     +33.61    +40.70   +42.39  

-100 basis points

   -43.20     -45.35     -53.23  

–100 basis points

   –35.48    –43.20   –45.35  

During the periods presented, the company has not recorded amounts for ineffectiveness in the consolidated income statement pursuant to IAS 39.

There are market-related limitations in the method used for the sensitivity analysis. These limitations derive from the fact that the levels indicated by the futures curves may not be necessarily met and may change in each period.

Risk of Variation in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

LANLATAM sells most of its services in U.S. dollars (or prices equivalent to the U.S. dollar), and, afollowing the combination with TAM, in Brazilian real. A large part of its expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars (or its equivalents), particularly fuel costs, aeronautic charges, aircraft leases, insurance and aircraft components and accessories. Of the TotalLATAM’s total expenses, the main item denominated in local currencies is Remunerations.employee remuneration. During 2011, 78%2012, 54% of our operating revenues and 53%42% of our operating expenses were denominated in U.S. dollars. In 2012, the proportion of our operating revenues denominated in U.S. dollars has decreased due to the combination with TAM, increasing our exposure to Brazilian domestic market and Brazilian real as compared to 2011. However, because we conduct business in local currencies in several countries, we face the risk of variations in multiple foreign currency exchange rates. A depreciation of the Chilean peso, the Brazilian real, the Argentine peso, the Mexican peso, the Peruvian nuevo sol, the Venezuelan bolivar or the euro against the U.S. dollar could have an adverse effect on us as part of our revenues and receivables are denominated in those currencies. LANThe Company may enter into derivative contracts to protect the possible appreciation or depreciation of the currencies against the functional currency of the Company.

Balance sheet exposure of LATAM to the Brazilian real is related to the functional currency of TAM and its balance sheet currency mismatch, as more of TAM’s debt is denominated in U.S. dollars as compared to its assets denominated in U.S. dollars. When the balance sheet denominated in U.S. dollars is translated to Brazilian real, the financial results of TAM may fluctuate and therefore could impact LATAM’s financial results. The following table shows the sensitivity of TAM’s financial results to changes in the R$/US$ exchange rate:

   TAM exchange rate  sensitivity
Position as of December 31
 
   2012   2011   2010 
   LATAM   TAM   TAM 
   (millions of US$) 

Appreciation (depreciation) of R$/US$

      

–10%

   +404.19     +439.16     +315.34  

+10%

   –404.21     –439.16     –315.34  

The prices of frequent flyer points of TAM’s subsidiary, Multiplus S.A., are denominated in U.S. dollars. As the functional currency is the Brazilian real, the sale of these frequent flyer points are subject to variations in the R$/US$ exchange rate. To reduce its exposure, Multiplus S.A. has entered into currency forward contracts in order to convert its deposit in Chilean pesos toexchange rate collars.

The following table presents the notional amount and the market value of the derivative exchange rate collars for each maturity date. The expiration dates of the derivatives coincide with the probable date of redemption of the frequent flyer points. The redemption of the frequent flyer points are recognized as a highly probable event and will be recognized as income, on average, six months after redemption.

   Multiplus exchange rate collars
Position as of December 31(millions of US$)
 
   2013   2014   Total 

Foreign Currency Derivative

      

Notional Value (MU$)

   +283.00     +18.00     +301.00  

Market Value (MU$)

  14.68    0.55    15.23  

If the Brazilian real appreciates or depreciates by 10% against the U.S. dollars. Asdollar and all other variables are held constant, the financial results of Multiplus S.A. would have varied approximately by US$21.8 million (appreciation)/US$28.2 million (depreciation) for the year ended December 31, 2011 we had foreign exchange forward contracts for a notional amount of US$110 million with a market negative2013.

The profit or losses caused by changes in the fair value of US$0.3 million.

During the first halfhedged item are segregated between intrinsic value and time value. The intrinsic value is the percentage of 2009,cash flow covered, initially shown in the Company entered into cross currency swaps for a notional amount of US$ 171 million, in orderequity and later transferred to income, while the hedge significant variationtransaction is recorded as income. The time value corresponds to the ineffective portion of the cash flows associated toflow hedge and is recognized in the current interest rate and the dolar-peso exchange ratefinancial results of the bank loan. As of December 31, 2011 these contracts ceased to exist.Company.

Our foreign currency exchange exposure pertaining to our balance sheet as of December 31, 20112012 was as followsfollows:

 

  LATAM foreign currency exchange exposure 
  US
dollars

MUS$
   % of
total
 Chilean
pesos

MUS$
   % of
total
 Other
currencies

$
MUS$
   % of
total
 Total
MUS$
   US
dollars
MUS$
   % of
total
 Brazilian
real

MUS$
   % of
total
 Chilean
pesos
MUS$
   % of
total
 Other
currencies
MUS$
   % of
total
 Total
MUS$
 

Current assets

   868,113     64.62  230,279     17.14  244,959     18.23  1,343,351     1,084,715     32.40  1,555,977     46.48  214,699     6.41  492,223     14.71  3,347,614  

Other assets

   6,123,678     97.12  8,412     0.13  173,218     2.75  6,305,308     5,472,463     31.73  11,449,975     66.39  18,220     0.11  304,995     1.77  17,245,653  

Total assets

   6,991,791     91.41  238,691     3.12  418,177     5.47  7,648,659     6,557,178     31.84  13,005,952     63.16  232,919     1.13  797,218     3.87  20,593,267  

Current liabilities

   1,980,849     85.30  80,937     3.49  260,293     11.21  2,322,079     3,387,555     58.61  1,703,513     29.47  91,080     1.58  598,141     10.35  5,780,289  

Long-term liabilities

   3,834,840     99.11  6,684     0.17  27,684     0.72  3,869,208     8,727,424     90.49  876,506     9.09  8,676     0.09  31,556     0.33  9,644,162  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   7,244,983     94.72  98,739     1.29  304,937     3.99  7,648,659     17,283,795     83.93  2,580,019     12.53  99,756     0.48  629,697     3.06  20,593,267  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

For more information on Market Risk, see Note 3 “Financial Risk Management” to our audited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 12.DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

A. Debt Securities

Not applicable.

B. Warrants and Rights

Not applicable.

C. Other Securities

Not applicable.

D. American Depositary Shares

In the United States, our common shares trade in the form of ADS. Since August 2007, each ADS represents one common share, issued by The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary pursuant to a Deposit Agreement. ADSs commenced trading on the NYSE in 1997. In October 2011 our Depositary bank changed from The Bank of New York Mellon to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JP Morgan”).

Fees and Charges for ADR Holders

The Bank of New York Mellon, and since October 2011 JP Morgan, as depositary, collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of the distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may also collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions, by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:  For:
US$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)  

Ÿ

•         Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property

Ÿ

•         Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

US$.02 (or less) per ADS  Ÿ

•         Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs  Ÿ

•         Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositary to ADS registered holders

US$.02 (or less) per ADSs per calendar year  Ÿ

•         Depositary services

Registration or transfer fees  Ÿ

•         Transfer and registration of shares on the depositary’s share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when investors deposit or withdraw shares

Expenses of the depositary  Ÿ

•         Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions

Ÿ

•         Conversion of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars

Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, such as stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes  Ÿ

•         As necessary

Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities  Ÿ

•         As necessary

Fees and Direct and Indirect Payments Made by the Depositary to the Foreign Issuer

Past Fees and Payments

During 2011,2012, the Company received from the depositary $766,020$US$1.4 million for continuing annual stock exchange listing fees, standard out-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs (consisting of the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of U.S. Federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile, and telephone calls), payments related to applicable performance indicators relating to the ADR facility, underwriting fees and legal fees.

Future Fees and Payments

JP Morgan, as the new depositary bank, has agreed to reimburse the Company for certain of our reasonable expenses related to our ADS program and incur by us in connection with the program. The reimbursements include direct payments (legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with preparation of Form 20-F and ongoing SEC compliance and listing requirements, listing fees, investor relations expenses, advertising and public relations expenses and fees payable to service providers for the distribution of hard copy materials to beneficial ADR holders in the Depositary Trust Company, such as information related to shareholders’ meetings and related voting instruction cards); and indirect payments (third-party expenses paid directly and fees waived).

PART II

 

ITEM 13.DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14.MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

 

ITEM 15.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Controls and Procedures

WeManagement carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including ourthe chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of ourthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2011.2012. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon oursuch evaluation, ourmanagement, with the participation of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2011,2012, were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting

The management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, as amended.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group S.A.’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20112012 based on the criteria established in Internal Control - “Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and, based on such criteria, Lan Airlines’LATAM Airlines Group S.A.’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2011,2012, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective. The Company’scompany’s internal control over financial reporting effectiveness as of December 31, 20112012 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers Consultores, Auditores y Companía Limitada, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.

(c)Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm. See page F-2F-193 of our audited consolidated financial statements.

(d)Changes in internal control over financial reporting. ThereExcept for certain internal control procedures that have been modified to address the incorporation of TAM S.A., there has been no significant change in our internal control over financial reporting during 2011 that2012. None of the changes has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16.RESERVED

A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our Board of Directors has designated Jorge Awad Mehech,Georges de Bourguignon Arndt, as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of this Item 16A.16. A. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors”.Directors and Senior Management.”

B. CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a code of ethics and conduct, as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act. Our code of ethics applies to our senior management, including our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our chief accounting officer, as well as to other employees. Our code is freely available online at our website, www.lan.com, under the heading “Corporate Governance” in the Investor Relations page. In addition, upon written request, by regular mail, to the following address: LanLAN Airlines S.A., Investor Relations Department, attention: Investor Relations, Av. Presidente Riesco 5711, Piso 20, Comuna Las Condes, Santiago, Chile, or by e-mail atinvestor.relations@lan.com we will provide any person with a copy of it without charge. If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our senior management or to other persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website.

C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the fees billedpaid to us by our independent auditors,registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2011:2012:

 

  2012   2011   2010 
  2011   2010   2009   USD (in thousands) 

Audit fees

   1,823.0     1,478.0     1,431.4     5,809     1,823     1,478  

Audit-related fees

   0     427.0     0.0     195     0     427  

Tax fees

   229.0     149.0     0.0     80     229     149  

Other fees

   590.0     14.0     37.7     421     590     14  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total fees

   2,642.0     2,068.0     1,469.1     6,505     2,642     2,068  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Audit-related fees in the above table are fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers for due diligence and other audit related services. These fees increased in 2012 as a result of due diligence performed on TAM. Fees in 2012 include payments to PricewaterhouseCoopers Brazil, since the business combination with TAM.

Other fees in the above table are fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers primarily for training services in IFRS. During 2011 these fees increased due to additional services related to the preparation of the F4 Form proformas,F-4, relating to our exchange offer and others.business combination with TAM, the preparation of pro forma financial statements, and other services. Other fees in 2012 also included the preparation of pro forma financial statements included in this Form 20-F.

Board of Directors’ Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Since January 2004, LAN compliesLATAM has complied with the SEC regulation regarding whatthe type of additional services PricewaterhouseCoopers is authorized to offer to us. In addition to this, our Board of Directors’ Committee (which serves as our Audit Committee) has decided to automatically authorize thoseany of such accepted services for an amount of up to 10% of the fees charged by the auditing firm, and for an amount of up to 50% when adding all thosesuch services together. In caseprovided by PricewaterhouseCoopers in the aggregate. If the amount of any services is larger than that, then it will needthese thresholds, the approval of the Board of Directors’ Committee.Committee will be required.

D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

None.

E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

None.

F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

None.

G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Comparison

Pursuant to Section 303A.11 of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE, we are required to provide a summary of the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required for U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. We are a Chilean corporation with shares listed on the SSE, the Chilean Electronic Exchange and the Valparaiso Stock Exchange, andour ADSs listed on the NYSE.NYSE and our BDRs listed on Bovespa. Our corporate governance practices are governed by our bylaws, the Chilean Corporation Law and the Securities Market Law.

The table below discloses the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE standards.

 

NYSE Standards Our Corporate Governance Practice
Director Independence.Majority of board of directors must be independent. §303A.01 Under Chilean law, we are not required to have a majority of independent directors on our board.
 Our board of directors’ committee (all of whom are members of our board of directors) is composed of three directors, two of whom must be independent if we have a sufficient number of independent directors on our board.
 The definition of independence applicable to us pursuant to the Chilean Corporation Law differs in certain respects from the definition applicable to U.S. issuers under the NYSE rules.
 

Pursuant to Law No. 20,382 on Corporate Governance, which came into effect on January 1, 2010, we are also required to have at least one independent director.

NYSE StandardsOur Corporate Governance Practice

Until January 1, 2010, under the Chilean Corporation Law, a director was deemed to be independent if such member would have been elected as a Director at the Shareholders Meeting after excluding the votes of any controlling shareholder or party related to it.

NYSE StandardsOur Corporate Governance Practice
 

Starting on January 1, 2010, directors are deemed to be independent if they have not fallen within any of the following categories during the 18 months prior to their election: (i) had a relevant relationship, interest or dependence on us, our subsidiaries, controlling shareholders, main executives, or had served any of the foregoing in a senior position; (ii) had a close family relationship with any of the individuals indicated in (i); (iii) had served in a non-profit organization which received significant funds from the individuals indicated in (i); (iv) had been a partner or shareholder (with a direct or indirect participation in excess of 10%) in, or had a senior position at a company which has rendered significant services to, the individuals indicated in (i); (v) had been a partner or shareholder (with a direct or indirect participation in excess of 10%) in, or had a senior position at, our main competitors, suppliers or clients. In addition, the election of such an independent director is subject to a procedure set forth by the cited Corporation Law.

Executive Sessions.Non-management directors must meet regularly in executive sessions without management. Independent directors should meet alone in an executive session at least once a year. §303A.03 There is no similar requirement under our bylaws or under applicable Chilean law.
Audit committee.Audit committee satisfying the independence and other requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, as amended, and the more stringent requirements under the NYSE standards is required. §§303A.06, 303A.07 We are in compliance with Rule 10A-3. We are not required to satisfy the NYSE independence and other audit committee standards that are not prescribed by Rule 10A-3.
Nominating/corporate governance committee.Nominating/corporate governance committee of independent directors is required. The committee must have a charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. § 303A.04§303A.04 We are not required to have, and do not have, a nominating/corporate governance committee.
Compensation committee.Compensation committee of independent directors is required, which must approve executive officer compensation. The committee must have a charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. §303A.05 We are not required to have a compensation committee. Pursuant to the Chilean Corporation Law, our board of directors’ committee must approve our senior management and employee’s compensation.
Equity compensation plans.Equity compensation plans require shareholder approval, subject to limited exemptions. Under the Chilean Corporation Law, equity compensation plans require shareholder approval.

NYSE StandardsOur Corporate Governance Practice
Code of Ethics.. Corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics is required, with disclosure of any waiver for directors or executive officers. §303A.10 We have adopted a code of ethics and conduct applicable to our senior management, including our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our chief accounting officer, as well as to other employees. Our code is freely available online at our website,www.lan.com, www.latamairlinesgroup.net, under the heading “Corporate

NYSE StandardsOur Corporate Governance Practice
Governance” in the Investor Relations informational page. In addition, upon written request, by regular mail to LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A., Investor Relations Department, attention: Investor Relations, Av. Presidente Riesco 5711, Piso 20th floot, Comuna Las Condes, Santiago, Chile or by e-mail at Investor.Relations@lan.com, we will provide any person with a copy of our code of ethics without charge. We are required by Item 16B of Form 20-F to disclose any waivers granted to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions.

The disclosure of the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required for U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards is also posted on our website and can be accessed at www.lan.com.www.latamairlinesgroup.net

H. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART III

 

ITEM 17.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See “Item 18. Financial Statements”.Statements.”

 

ITEM 18.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See our consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1. The following is an index of the financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements for LanLATAM Airlines Group and its Subsidiaries

 

   Page 

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1-B-1F-1  

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 20102011 and 20112012

   F-1-1F-4  

Consolidated Statement of Income by Function for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012

F-6

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 20102011 and 20112012

   F-1-4F-7  

Statement of Changes in net equityEquity for the year ended December 31, 2009, 20102011 and 20112012

   F-1-5F-8  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Direct Method for the years ended December 31, 2009, 20102011 and 20112012

   F-1-7F-11  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements at December 31, 20112012

   F-1-8F-12

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-193  

 

ITEM 19.EXHIBITS

Documents filed as exhibits to this annual report:

 

Exhibit
No.

 

Description

  1.11.1* Amended By-laws of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.
  2.1 Second Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2011, between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
  2.22.3 Foreign Investment ContractIndenture, dated as of April 25, 2007, among the CentralTAM Capital Inc., Tam S.A., TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., The Bank of Chile, LanChileNew York and The Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A. and Citibank, N.A., as depositary, relating to the foreign exchange treatment of holders of ADSs (incorporatedincorporated herein by reference from our second pre-effective amendment to our annual reportRegistration Statement on Form 20-F (FileF-4, File No. 001-14728) filed on June 14, 2004).333-131938.
  2.32.4 Amendment to the Agreement made according to Former Chapter XXVI of Title I of the Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations of the Central Bank of Chile,Indenture, dated as of October 28, 2011,29, 2009, among the Company, the Central Bank of Chile,TAM Capital 2 Inc., TAM S.A., TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., The Bank of New York Mellon and JP Morgan ChaseThe Bank N.A.of New York Mellon (Luxembourg) S.A., incorporated herein by reference from our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 on Form 20-F, filed June 30, 2010, File. No. 333-131938.
  4.1 Second A320 FamilyA320-Family Purchase Agreement, dated March 20, 1998, between the Company and Airbus IndustrieIndustry relating to Airbus A320-Family Aircraft (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 24, 2001 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.1.1 Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 14, 2003 and Amendment No. 2 dated as of October 4, 2005, to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (as successor to Airbus Industrie)Industry) (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 30, 2006 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).

Exhibit
No.

Description

  4.1.2 Amendment No. 3 dated as of March 6, 2007, to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 30, 2006 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).

Exhibit
No.

Description

  4.1.3 Amendment No. 5 dated as of December 23, 2009, to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 29, 2010 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.1.4 Amendments No. 6, 7, 8 and 9 (dated as of May 10, 2010, May 19, 2010, September 23, 2010 and December 21, 2010, respectively), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.1.5 Amendments No. 10 and 11 (dated as of June 10, 2011 and November 8, 2011, respectively), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.1.6*Amendments No. 12 (dated as of November 19, 2012), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. Portions of these documents have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.2 Purchase Agreement No. 2126 dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company as amended and supplemented, relating to Model 767-316ER, Model 767-38EF, and Model 767-316F Aircraft (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on December 21, 2004 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.2.1 Supplemental Agreements No. 16, 19, 20, 21 and 22 (dated as of November 11, 2004, January 21, March 10, April 1, April 28, and July 20, 2005, and March 31, 2006, respectively) to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 dated January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company, relating to Model 767-316ER, Model 767-38EF, and Model 767-316F Aircraft (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report filed on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 7, 2007 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.2.2 Supplemental Agreement No. 23 dated as of March 6, 2007, to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 23, 2007 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.2.3 Supplemental Agreement No. 24 dated as of November 10, 2008, to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.treatment (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 25, 2009 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.2.4.4.2.4 Supplemental Agreements No. 28 and 29 (dated as of March 22, 2010 and November 10, 2010, respectively), to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company. Portions of these documents have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.treatment (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).

Exhibit
No.

Description

  4.2.5 Supplemental Agreements No. 30, 31 and 32 (dated as of February 15, 2011, May 10, 2011 and December 22, 2011, respectively), to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company. PortionsCompany (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of these documentswhich have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.treatment).
  4.3 Aircraft Lease Common Terms Agreement between GE Commercial Aviation Services Limited and LanLAN Cargo S.A., dated as of April 30, 2007, and Aircraft Lease Agreements between Wells Fargo Bank Northwest N.A., as owner trustee, and LanLAN Cargo S.A., dated as of April 30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 7, 2007 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).

Exhibit
No.

Description

  4.4 Purchase Agreement NoNo. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company relating to Boeing Model 777-Freighter aircraft dated as of July 3, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 25, 2008 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.4.1 Supplemental Agreement No. 2 dated as of November 2, 2010, to the Purchase Agreement NoNo. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of July 3, 2007.2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.4.2 Supplemental Agreement No. 3 dated as of September 24, 2011, to the Purchase Agreement NoNo. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of July 3, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.4.3*Supplemental Agreement No. 4 dated as of August 9, 2012, to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of July 3, 2007. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.5 Purchase Agreement No. 3256 between the Company and The Boeing Company relating to Boeing Model 787-8 and 787-9 aircraft dated as of October 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 25, 2008 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.5.1 Supplemental Agreements No. 1 and 2 (dated March 22, 2010 and July 8, 2010, respectively) to the Purchase Agreement No. 3256 dated October 29, 2007, as amended, between the Company and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.5.2*Supplemental Agreement No. 3 dated as of August 24, 2012, to the Purchase Agreement No. 3256, as amended, between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of October 29, 2007. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.6 General Terms Agreement No. CFM-1-2377460475 and Letter Agreement No. 1 to General Terms Agreement No. CFM-1-2377460475 between the Company and CFM International, Inc., both dated December 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.7 Rate Per Flight Hour Engine Shop Maintenance Services Agreement between the Company and CFM International, Inc., dated December 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).

Exhibit
No.

Description

  4.8 Digital Services Agreement, dated December 17, 2010 between the Company and GE Engine Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.9 Implementation Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2011, among the Company, Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., Inversiones MinerasInversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A., TAM S.A., TAM Empreedimentos e Participações S.A. and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, Maurício Rolim Amaro,cioRolimAmaro, Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro and João Francisco Amaro (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011).
  4.9.1 Extension Letter to the Implementation Agreement and Exchange Offer Agreement dated January 12, 2012 among the Company, Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., Inversiones MinerasInversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A., TAM S.A., TAM Empreedimentos e Participações S.A. and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, Maurício Rolim Amaro,cioRolimAmaro, Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro and João Francisco Amaro (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
  4.10 Exchange Offer Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2011, among LanLAN Airlines S.A., Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., Inversiones MinerasInversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A., TAM S.A., TAM Empreedimentos e Participações S.A. and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, Maurício Rolim Amaro,cioRolimAmaro, Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro and João Francisco Amaro (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011).
  4.11 Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, among Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., Inversiones MinerasInversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A. and TEP Chile S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).

Exhibit
No.

Description

  4.12 Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, between the Company and TEP Chile S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
  4.13 Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, among the Company, TEP Chile S.A. and Holdco I S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
  4.14 Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, among the Company, TEP Chile S.A., Holdco I S.A. and TAM S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
  4.15 Letter Agreement No. 12 (GTA No. 6-9576), dated July 11, 2011, between the Company and the General Electric Company. PortionsCompany (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of these documentswhich have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.treatment).
  4.16 Used PW6122A Five Engine Purchase Agreement, dated July 21, 2011, between the Company and Pratt & Whitney Engine Leasing, LLC. PortionsLLC (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of these documentswhich have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.treatment).
  4.17 Promise to Sell dated as of January 25, 2011, among LanLAN Cargo S.A., Inversiones LanInversionesLAN S.A. and Bethia S.A. (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012).
  4.18 Assignment of Social Rights, dated as of April 6, 2011, between LanLAN Cargo S.A., Inversiones LanInversionesLAN S.A., Servicios de Trasportes LimitadaTrasportesLimitada and Inversiones Betmin SpA.InversionesBetminSpA (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012).
  4.19 Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2011, between LanLAN Cargo S.A. and Inversiones Betmin SpA.InversionesBetminSpA (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012).
  4.20 A320 NEO Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 22, 2011, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. Portions(incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of this documentwhich have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.treatment).

Exhibit
No.

Description

  4.21 Buyback Agreement No. 3001 relating to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3001, dated as of April 14, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.22Buyback Agreement No. 3030 relating to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3003, dated as of August 10, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.23Buyback Agreement No. 3062, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3062, dated as of May 13, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.24Buyback Agreement No. 3214, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3214, dated as of June 9, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.25Buyback Agreement No. 3216, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3216, dated as of July 13, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.26Aircraft General Terms Agreement Number AGTA-LAN, dated May 9, 1997, between the Company and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
  4.27*Buyback Agreement No. 3371 dated as of July 25, 2012, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.224.28* Buyback Agreement No. 3030 relating to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3003,3390, dated as of August 10, 2011,October 26, 2012, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.234.29* Buyback Agreement No. 3062, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3062,3438, dated as of May 13, 2011,December 5, 2012, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.244.30* Buyback Agreement No. 3214, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3214,3469, dated as of June 9, 2011,January 4, 2013, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.254.31* Buyback Agreement No. 3216, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3216,3509, dated as of July 13, 2011,February 20, 2013, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.264.32 Aircraft General TermsA320 Family Purchase Agreement, Number AGTA-LAN, dated May 9, 1997,March 19, 1998, between Airbus S.A.S. (formerly known as Airbus Industrie GIE) and TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. (formerly known as TAM Transportes Aéreas Meridionais S.A. and as successor in interest in TAM-Transportes Aéreas Regionais S.A.), incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.
  4.32.1*Amendments No. 12, 13 and 14 (dated as of January 27, 2012 and November 30, 2012 and December 14, 2012, respectively), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and The Boeing Company.Airbus S.A.S. Portions of this documentthese documents have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  4.33A350 Family Purchase Agreement, dated December 20, 2005, between Airbus S.A.S. and TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.
  4.34V2500 Maintenance Agreement, dated September 14, 2000, between TAM Transportes Aéreos Regionais S.A. (incorporated by TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.) and MTU Maintenance Hannover GmbH (MTU), incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.

Exhibit
No.

 

Description

  8.14.35PW4168A Maintenance Service Agreement, dated September 14, 2000, between TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. and United Technologies International, Inc., Pratt & Whitney Division, incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.
  8.1* List of subsidiaries of the CompanyCompany.
12.112.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
12.212.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.113.1* Certifications of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*
15.1Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers.Filed herewith.

LOGO

LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20112012

CONTENTS

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Consolidated Statement of Income by Function

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - Direct Method

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Consolidated Statement of Income by Function
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows – Direct Method
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

CLP  –  -CHILEAN PESO
ARS  –  -ARGENTINE PESO
US$  –  -UNITED STATES DOLLAR
THUS$  –  -THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS
COP  –  -COLOMBIAN PESO


LOGO

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, as amended.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Lan Airlines’ management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on the criteria established in Internal Control—“Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and, based on such criteria, Lan Airlines’ management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective. The company’s internal control over financial reporting effectiveness as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers Consultores, Auditores y Companía Limitada, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.

/s/     Enrique Cueto PlazaBRL/R$  -  /s/    Alejandro de la Fuente GoicBRAZILIAN REAL
Enrique Cueto PlazaTHR$  -  Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerTHOUSANDS OF BRAZILIAN REAL

February 14, 2012

F-1-A


LOGO

PricewaterhouseCoopers

RUT: 81.513.400-1

Santiago – Chile

AV. Andres Bello 2711 - Pisos 2,3, 4Y 5

LasCondes

Teléfono: (56) (2) 940 0000

www.pwc.cl

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Lan Airlines S.A.

In our opinion, the accompanying balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lan Airlines S.A. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

F-1-B-1


LOGO

Lan Airlines S.A.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers

Santiago, Chile

February 14, 2012

F-1-B-2


LOGO

Contents of the notes to the consolidated financial statements of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries.

Notes

 

Notes
Page

1

1 - General information

  F-1-8

2

2 - Summary of significant accounting policies

  F-1-11

2.1.

2.1. Preparation

  F-1-11

2.2.

2.2. Consolidation

  F-1-13

2.3.

2.3. Foreign currency transactions

  F-1-14

2.4.

2.4. Property, plant and equipment

  F-1-14

2.5.

2.5. Intangible assets other than goodwill

  F-1-15

2.6.

2.6. Goodwill

  F-1-15

2.7.

2.7. Borrowing costs

  F-1-15

2.8.

2.8. Losses for impairment of non-financial assets

  F-1-15

2.9.

2.9. Financial assets

  F-1-16

2.10.

2.10. Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities

  F-1-17

2.11.

2.11. Inventories

  F-1-18

2.12.

2.12. Trade and other accounts receivable

  F-1-18

2.13.

2.13. Cash and cash equivalents

  F-1-18

2.14.

2.14. Capital

  F-1-18

2.15.

2.15. Trade and other accounts payables

  F-1-18

2.16.

2.16. Interest-bearing loans

  F-1-19

2.17.

2.17. Deferred taxes

  F-1-19

2.18.

2.18. Employee benefits

  F-1-19

2.19.

2.19. Provisions

  F-1-20

2.20.

2.20. Revenue recognition

  F-1-20

2.21.

2.21. Leases

  F-1-21

2.22.

2.22. Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale

  F-1-21

2.23.

2.23. Maintenance

  F-1-21

2.24.

Environment2.24. Environmental costs

  F-1-21

3

3 - Financial risk management

  F-1-21

3.1.

3.1. Financial risk factors

  F-1-21

3.2.

3.2. Capital risk management

  F-1-29

3.3.

3.3. Estimates of fair value

  F-1-30

4

4 - Accounting estimates and judgments

  F-1-31

5

5 - Segmental Informationinformation

  F-1-32

6

6 - Cash and cash equivalents

  F-1-33

7

7 - Financial instruments

  F-1-34

7.1.

7.1. Financial instruments by category

  F-1-34

7.2.

7.2. Financial instruments by currency

  F-1-36

8

8 - Trade, other accounts receivable and non-current accounts receivable

  F-1-37

9

9 - Accounts receivable from/payable to related entities

  F-1-39

10

10 - Inventories

  F-1-40

11 - Tax assets

  

12 - Other financial assets

  F-1-40

12

13 - Other non financialnon-financial assets

  F-1-42

13

Non-current14 - Non current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale

  F-1-43

14

15 - Investments in subsidiaries

  F-1-44

15

16 - Equity accounted investments

  

F-1-46
Note 

16

17 - Intangible assets other than goodwill

  
F-1-47

18 - Goodwill and bussines combination

  


LOGO

Notes

Page

17

18.1. Goodwill

  F-1-48

1818.2. Business Combination

  

19 - Property, plant and equipment

  F-1-49

19

Income taxes20 - Taxes and deferred tax

  F-1-56

20

21 - Other financial liabilities

  F-1-59

21

22 - Trade and other accounts payables

  F-1-63

22

23 - Other provisions

  F-1-65

2324 - Tax liabilities

  

25 - Other current non-financial liabilities

  F-1-66

24

26 - Employee benefits

  F-1-67

25

Non-current accounts27 - Accounts payable non-current

  F-1-68

26

28 - Equity

  F-1-69

27

29 - Revenue

  F-1-72

28

30 - Costs and expenses by nature

  F-1-73

29

31 - Gains (losses) on the sale of non-current assets not classified as held for sale

  F-1-74

30

32 - Other income, by function

  F-1-74

31

33 - Foreign currency and exchange rate differences

  F-1-75

32

34 - Earnings per share

  F-1-79

33

35 - Contingencies

  F-1-80

34

36 - Commitments

  F-1-86

35

37 - Transactions with related parties

  F-1-90

36

38 - Share-based payments

  F-1-92

37

39 - The environment

  F-1-93

38

Subsequent events40 – Events subsequent to the date of the financial statements

  F-1-93

39

Business combinations41 – Consolidation Schedule

  F-1-94


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

ASSETS

   

Note

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
      ThUS$   ThUS$ 

ASSETS

      

Current Assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  6 - 7   374,407     631,052  

Other financial assets

  7 - 11   227,803     245,451  

Other non-financial assets

  12   26,660     18,820  

Trade and other accounts receivable

  7 - 8   537,406     481,350  

Accounts receivable from related entities

  7 - 9   838     50  

Inventories

  10   72,787     53,193  

Tax assets

     98,789     97,656  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets other than non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale

     1,338,690     1,527,572  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale

  13   4,661     5,497  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     1,343,351     1,533,069  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current Assets

      

Other financial assets

  7 - 11   21,833     21,587  

Other non-financial assets

  12   58,163     32,508  

Accounts receivable

  7 - 8   7,491     7,883  

Equity accounted investments

  15   991     593  

Intangible assets other than goodwill

  16   64,923     45,749  

Goodwill

  17   163,777     157,994  

Property, plant and equipment

  18   5,927,982     4,948,430  

Deferred tax assets

  19   60,148     38,084  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

     6,305,308     5,252,828  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     7,648,659     6,785,897  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

      As of   As of 
      December 31,   December 31, 
   Note  2012   2011 
      ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  6 - 7   650,263     374,407  

Other financial assets

  7 - 12   636,543     227,803  

Other non-financial assets

  13   169,824     32,711  

Trade and other accounts receivable

  7 - 8   1,426,330     531,355  

Accounts receivable from related entities

  7 - 9   15,187     838  

Inventories

  10   181,283     72,787  

Tax assets

  11   220,529     98,789  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets other than non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale or as held for distribution to owners

     3,299,959     1,338,690  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale or as held for distribution to owners

  14   47,655     4,661  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     3,347,614     1,343,351  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current assets

      

Other financial assets

  7 - 12   74,095     21,833  

Other non-financial assets

  13   243,905     15,205  

Accounts receivable

  7 - 8   50,612     7,491  

Equity accounted investments

  16   3,757     991  

Intangible assets other than goodwill

  17   1,848,593     64,923  

Goodwill

  18   2,948,462     163,777  

Property, plant and equipment

  19   11,797,889     5,927,982  

Current tax assets, long term portion

  11   73,516     42,958  

Deferred tax assets

  20   144,629     60,148  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

     17,185,458     6,305,308  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     20,533,072     7,648,659  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying Notes 1 to 3941 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1-1


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

   

Note

  As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
 
      ThUS$  ThUS$ 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

     

LIABILITIES

     

Current liabilities

     

Other financial liabilities

  7 - 20   582,257    542,624  

Trade and other accounts payables

  7 - 21   645,086    645,571  

Accounts payable to related entities

  7 - 9   367    184  

Other provisions

  22   7,363    753  

Tax liabilities

     29,369    15,736  

Other non-financial liabilities

  23   1,057,637    939,151  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     2,322,079    2,144,019  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

     

Other financial liabilities

  7 - 20   3,109,136    2,562,348  

Accounts payable

  7 - 25   354,930    425,681  

Other provisions

  22   22,385    32,120  

Deferred tax liabilities

  19   369,625    312,012  

Employee benefits

  24   13,132    9,657  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

     3,869,208    3,341,818  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     6,191,287    5,485,837  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

EQUITY

     

Share capital

  26   473,907    453,444  

Retained earnings

  26   1,116,798    949,214  

Other equity interests

  26   8,492    5,463  

Other reserves

  26   (153,873  (111,307
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Equity attributable to owners of the parent

     1,445,324    1,296,814  

Non-controlling interests

     12,048    3,246  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity

     1,457,372    1,300,060  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

     7,648,659    6,785,897  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

      As of  As of 
      December 31,  December 31, 
   Note  2012  2011 
      ThUS$  ThUS$ 

LIABILITIES

     

Current liabilities

     

Other financial liabilities

  7 - 21   2,047,330    582,257  

Trade and other accounts payables

  7 - 22   1,652,955    645,086  

Accounts payable to related entities

  7 - 9   274    367  

Other provisions

  23   21,719    7,363  

Tax liabilities

  24   115,481    29,369  

Other non-financial liabilities

  25   1,942,530    1,057,637  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     5,780,289    2,322,079  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

     

Other financial liabilities

  7 - 21   7,698,857    3,109,136  

Accounts payable

  7 - 27   731,235    354,930  

Other provisions

  23   445,129    22,385  

Deferred tax liabilities

  20   589,059    369,625  

Employee benefits

  26   18,366    13,132  

Other non-financial liabilities

  25   101,321    —    
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

     9,583,967    3,869,208  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     15,364,256    6,191,287  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

EQUITY

     

Share capital

  28   1,501,018    473,907  

Retained earnings

  28   1,106,168    1,116,798  

Treasury Shares

  28   (203  —    

Other reserves

  28   2,535,100    (145,381
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Parent’s ownership interest

     5,142,083    1,445,324  

Non-controlling interest

     26,733    12,048  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity

     5,168,816    1,457,372  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

     20,533,072    7,648,659  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying Notes 1 to 3941 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1-2


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME BY FUNCTION

 

     For the year ended December 31,      For the periods ended December 31, 
  Note  2011 2010 2009   Note  2012 2011 2010 
     ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$      ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Revenue

  27   5,585,440    4,390,502    3,519,162    29   9,722,189    5,585,440    4,390,502  

Cost of sales

     (4,078,598  (3,012,698  (2,522,778     (7,642,643  (4,078,598  (3,012,698
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross margin

     1,506,842    1,377,804    996,384       2,079,546    1,506,842    1,377,804  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other income

  30   132,804    132,826    136,351    32   220,156    132,804    132,826  

Distribution costs

     (479,829  (383,517  (326,964     (803,619  (479,829  (383,517

Administrative expenses

     (405,716  (331,831  (269,588     (869,504  (405,716  (331,831

Other expenses

     (214,411  (172,428  (100,483     (311,753  (214,411  (172,428

Other gains/(losses)

     (33,039  5,438    (11,728     (38,750  (33,039  5,438  
    

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gains (losses) from operating activities

     276,076    506,651    628,292  
    

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial income

     14,453    14,946    18,183       77,489    14,453    14,946  

Financial costs

  28   (139,077  (155,279  (153,109  30   (294,598  (139,077  (155,279

Equity accounted earnings

  15   458    132    315    16   972    458    132  

Foreign exchange gains/(losses)

  31   (256  13,792    (11,237  33   66,685    (256  13,792  

Result of indexation units

     131    149    (605     (22  131    149  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before taxes

     382,360    502,032    277,519       126,602    382,360    502,032  

Income tax expense

  19   (61,789  (81,107  (44,487  20   (102,212  (61,789  (81,107
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR

     320,571    420,925    233,032  

NET INCOME FOR THE PERIOD

     24,390    320,571    420,925  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income attributable to owners of the parent

     320,197    419,702    231,126       10,956    320,197    419,702  

Income attributable to non-controlling interests

     374    1,223    1,906  

Income attributable to non-controlling interest

     13,434    374    1,223  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income for the year

     320,571    420,925    233,032  

Net income for the period

     24,390    320,571    420,925  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

EARNINGS PER SHARE

            

Basic earnings per share (US$)

  32   0.94335    1.23882    0.68221    34   0.02657    0.94335    1.23882  

Diluted earnings per share (US$)

  32   0.94260    1.23534    0.68221    34   0.02657    0.94260    1.23534  

The accompanying Notes 1 to 3941 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1-3


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

      For the year ended December 31,      For the periods ended December 31, 
  Note   2011 2010 2009   Note  2012 2011 2010 
      ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$      ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

NET INCOME

     320,571    420,925    233,032       24,390    320,571    420,925  

Components of other comprehensive income, before taxes

            

Currency translation differences

            

Gains (losses) on currency translation, before tax

   31     (10,864  708    1,442    33   18,692    (10,864  708  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive income, before taxes, currency translation differences

     (10,864  708    1,442       18,692    (10,864  708  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flow hedges

            

Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges before tax

   20     (40,368  (17,855  252,508    21   (2,510  (40,368  (17,855
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive income, before taxes, cash flow hedges

     (40,368  (17,855  252,508       (2,510  (40,368  (17,855
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other components of other comprehensive income, before taxes

     (51,232  (17,147  253,950       16,182    (51,232  (17,147
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income tax relating to other comprehensive income [abstract]

      

Income tax relating to other comprehensive income

      

Income tax related to currency translation differences in other comprehensive income

   19     1,846    (120  1,008    20   (2,734  1,846    (120

Income tax related to cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income

   19     6,862    3,035    (42,925  20   (2,623  6,862    3,035  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Amount of income taxes related to components of other comprehensive income

     8,708    2,915    (41,917     (5,357  8,708    2,915  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive income

     (42,524  (14,232  212,033       10,825    (42,524  (14,232
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

     278,047    406,693    445,065       35,215    278,047    406,693  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to owners of the parent

     277,631    405,549    441,977       27,673    277,631    405,549  

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

     416    1,144    3,088       7,542    416    1,144  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

     278,047    406,693    445,065       35,215    278,047    406,693  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying Notes 1 to 3941 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1-4


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

 

 Attributable to owners of the parent      Attributable to owners of the parent     
     Other reserves              Changes in other reserves         
 Note Share
capital
 Other
equity
interests
 Reserve
for
exchange
on
translation
differences
 Cash
flow
hedging
reserve
 Retained
earnings
 Equity
attributable
to owners
of the
parent
 Non-
controlling
interests
 Total
equity
      Other Currency Cash flow   Parent’s Non-   
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$  Share Treasury sundry translation hedging Retained ownership controlling Total 

Equity previously reported January 1, 2011

   453,444    5,463    (4,257  (107,050  949,214    1,296,814    3,246    1,300,060  
 

Note

 capital shares reserve reserve reserve earnings interest interest equity 
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Equity as of January 1, 2012

   473,907    —      8,492    (13,317  (140,556  1,116,798    1,445,324    12,048    1,457,372  

Total increase (decrease) in equity

                   

Comprehensive income

                   

Gain (losses)

 26  —      —      —      —      320,197    320,197    374    320,571   28  —      —      —      —      —      10,956    10,956    13,434    24,390  

Other comprehensive income

   —      —      (9,060  (33,506  —      (42,566  42    (42,524   —      —      —      16,891    (174  —      16,717    (5,892  10,825  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

   —      —      (9,060  (33,506  320,197    277,631    416    278,047     —      —      —      16,891    (174  10,956    27,673    7,542    35,215  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Transactions with shareholders

                   

Equity issuance

 26-36  23,135    —      —      —      —      23,135    —      23,135   28-38  1,030,621    —      2,665,692    —      —      —      3,696,313    —      3,696,313  

Dividends

 26  —      —      —      —      (151,981  (151,981  —      (151,981 28  —      —      —      —      —      (21,749  (21,749  —      (21,749

Increase (decrease) through transactions with treasury shares

 28  —      (203  —      —      —      —      (203  —      (203

Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes, equity

 26-36  (2,672  3,029    —      —      (632  (275  8,386    8,111   28-38  (3,510  —      (1,928  —      —      163    (5,275  7,143    1,868  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total transactions with shareholders

   20,463    3,029    —      —      (152,613  (129,121  8,386    (120,735   1,027,111    (203  2,663,764    —      —      (21,586  3,669,086    7,143    3,676,229  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010

   473,907    8,492    (13,317  (140,556  1,116,798    1,445,324    12,048    1,457,372  

Closing balance as of
Current year ending balances December 31, 2012

   1,501,018    (203  2,672,256    3,574    (140,730  1,106,168    5,142,083    26,733    5,168,816  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying Notes 1 to 3941 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1-5


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

 

 Attributable to owners of the parent      Attributable to owners of the parent     
     Other reserves            Changes in other reserves         
 Note Share
capital
 Other
equity
interests
 Currency
translation
reserve
 Cash
flow
hedging
reserve
 Retained
earnings
 Equity
attributable to
owners of the
parent
 Non-
controlling
interests
 Total
equity
    Other Currency Cash flow   Parent’s Non-   
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$  Share sundry translation hedging Retained ownership controlling Total 

Equity previously reported January 1, 2010

   453,444    2,490    (4,924  (92,230  740,047    1,098,827    7,099    1,105,926  
 

Note

 capital reserves reserve reserve earnings interest interest equity 
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Equity as of January 1, 2011

   453,444    5,463    (4,257  (107,050  949,214    1,296,814    3,246    1,300,060  

Total increase (decrease) in equity

                  

Comprehensive income

                  

Gain (losses)

 26  —      —      —      —      419,702    419,702    1,223    420,925   28  —      —      —      —      320,197    320,197    374    320,571  

Other comprehensive income

   —      —      667    (14,820  —      (14,153  (79  (14,232   —      —      (9,060  (33,506  —      (42,566  42    (42,524
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

   —      —      667    (14,820  419,702    405,549    1,144    406,693     —      —      (9,060  (33,506  320,197    277,631    416    278,047  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Transactions with shareholders

                  

Equity issuance

 28-38  23,135    —      —      —      —      23,135    —      23,135  

Dividends

 26  —      —      —      —      (210,406  (210,406  —      (210,406 28  —      —      —      —      (151,981  (151,981  —      (151,981

Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes, equity

 26-36  —      2,973    —      —      (129  2,844    (4,997  (2,153 28-38  (2,672  3,029    —      —      (632  (275  8,386    8,111  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total transactions with shareholders

   —      2,973    —      —      (210,535  (207,562  (4,997  (212,559   20,463    3,029    —      —      (152,613  (129,121  8,386    (120,735
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010

   453,444    5,463    (4,257  (107,050  949,214    1,296,814    3,246    1,300,060  

Prior year ending balances December 31, 2011

   473,907    8,492    (13,317  (140,556  1,116,798    1,445,324    12,048    1,457,372  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying Notes 1 to 3941 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

    Attributable to owners of the parent       
          Other reserves             
  

Note

 Share
capital
  Other
equity
interests
  Currency
translation
reserve
  Cash flow
hedging
reserve
  Retained
earnings
  Equity
attributable to
owners

of the parent
  Non-
controlling
interests
  Total
equity
 
    ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Equity previously reported January 1, 2010

   453,444    2,490    (4,924  (92,230  740,047    1,098,827    7,099    1,105,926  

Total increase (decrease) in equity

         

Comprehensive income

         

Gain (losses)

 28  —      —      —      —      419,702    419,702    1,223    420,925  

Other comprehensive income

   —      —      667    (14,820  —      (14,153  (79  (14,232
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

   —      —      667    (14,820  419,702    405,549    1,144    406,693  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Transactions with shareholders

         

Dividends

 28  —      —      —      —      (210,406  (210,406  —      (210,406

Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes, equity

 28-38  —      2,973    —      —      (129  2,844    (4,997  (2,153
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total transactions with shareholders

   —      2,973    —      —      (210,535  (207,562  (4,997  (212,559
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010

   453,444    5,463    (4,257  (107,050  949,214    1,296,814    3,246    1,300,060  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying Notes 1 to 41 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-1-6


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DIRECT – METHOD

 

      For the year ended December 31,      For the periods ended December 31, 
  Note   2011 2010 2009   Note  2012 2011 2010 
      ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$      ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Cash flows from operating activities

            

Cash collection from operating activities

            

Proceeds from sales of goods and services

     5,966,464    4,831,963    3,871,189       10,258,473    5,966,464    4,831,963  

Other cash receipts from operating activities

     52,012    46,336    40,319       57,763    52,012    46,336  

Payments for operating activities

            

Payments to suppliers for goods and services

     (4,286,394  (3,058,168  (2,475,716     (7,153,865  (4,286,394  (3,058,168

Payments to and on behalf of employees

     (883,297  (633,686  (636,603     (1,938,769  (883,297  (633,686

Other payments for operating activities

     (84,000  (18,000  (19,000     (19,325  (84,000  (18,000

Interest paid

     (6,766  (387  —    

Interest received

     11,428    11,438    13,542       52,986    9,762    15,486  

Income taxes refunded (paid)

     626    (11,098  10,304       (3,018  626    (11,098

Other cash inflows (outflows)

     (7,499  (43,061  41,792       (50,433  (7,499  (43,061
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash flows from operating activities

     762,574    1,125,337    845,827       1,203,812    767,674    1,129,772  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

            

Cash flows from disposal of subsidiaries

     47,337    1,491    1,568  

Cash flows arising from the loss of control of subsidiaries

     —      47,337    1,491  

Cash flows used for acquisition of subsidiaries

     (3,541  (12,000  (921     (3,223  (3,541  (12,000

Cash flows used for in the purchase of non-controlling interests

     —      —      (2,439

Other cash receipts from sales of equity or debt instruments of other entities

     9,201    12,915    8,743       386,379    9,201    12,915  

Other payments to acquire equity or debt instruments of other entities

     (72  (60,000  (58,983     —      (72  (60,000

Amounts raised from sale of property, plant and equipment

     93,787    577    10,777       73,429    93,787    577  

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

     (1,367,025  (1,029,158  (538,576     (2,389,364  (1,367,025  (1,029,158

Amounts raised from sale of intangible assets

     6,189    —      —         —      6,189    —    

Purchases of intangible assets

     (27,615  (19,236  (12,888     (59,166  (27,615  (19,236

Amounts raised from other long-term assets

     38,035    —      —    

Dividends received

     89    111    414       351    89    111  

Interest received

     2,848    4,048    2,637  

Other cash inflows (outflows)

     545    812    —         27,143    545    812  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash flow used in investing activities

     (1,238,257  (1,100,440  (589,668     (1,926,416  (1,241,105  (1,104,488
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities

            

Amounts raised from issuance of shares

     23,153    —          83,512    23,153    —    

Amounts from issuance of other equity instruments

     —      —     

Payments to acquire or redeem the shares of the entity

     (203  —      —    

Amounts raised from long-term loans

     969,252    687,792    671,425       2,185,663    969,252    687,792  

Amounts raised from short-term loans

     334,500    —      —         152,000    334,500    —    

Loans Repayments

     (883,402  (554,539  (261,705

Loans repayments

     (539,332  (883,402  (554,539

Payments of finance lease liabilities

     (59,990  (54,034  (62,858     (292,931  (59,990  (54,034

Dividends paid

     (192,133  (155,407  (139,937     (124,827  (192,133  (155,407

Interest paid

     (119,086  (128,722  (129,323     (227,607  (121,338  (129,109

Other cash inflows (outflows)

     146,849    80,181    21,588       (231,079  146,849    80,181  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities

     219,143    (124,729  99,190       1,005,196    216,891    (125,116
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchanges rate change

     (256,540  (99,832  355,349       282,592    (256,540  (99,832

Effects of variation in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents

     (105  (613  (24,824     (6,736  (105  (613
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (256,645  (100,445  330,525       275,856    (256,645  (100,445

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR

   6     631,052    731,497    400,972  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

  6   374,407    631,052    731,497  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

   6     374,407    631,052    731,497  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

  6   650,263    374,407    631,052  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying Notes 1 to 3941 form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1-7


LOGO

LANLATAM AIRLINES S.A.GROUP S.A GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 20112012

NOTE 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION

LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. (the “Company” or “LAN”) is a public company registered with the Chilean Superintendency of Securities and Insurance (SVS), under No.306, whose shares are quoted in Chile on the ValparaísoStock Brokers – Stock Exchange (Valparaíso), the Chilean Electronic Stock Exchange and the Santiago Stock Exchange; it is also quoted in the United States of America on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)(“NYSE”) in New York in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs)(“ADRs”) and in Brazil BM & FBOVESPA S.A. – Stock Exchange, Mercadorias e Futuros, in the form of Brazilian Depositary Receipts (“BDRs”).

Its principal business is passenger and cargo air transportation, both in the domestic markets of Chile, Peru, Argentina, Colombia, and Ecuador and Brazil and in a developed series of regional and international routes in America, Europe and Oceania. These businesses are performed directly or through its subsidiaries in different countries. In addition, the Company has subsidiaries operating in the freight business in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia.

On August 13, 2010, LAN Airlinesthe Company reported to the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, as an Essential Matter, that at this date the Company Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A. and Inversiones Mineras del Cantábrico S.A. (the latter two, “Cueto Subsidiaries”), TAM S.A. (TAM) announced they have(“TAM”), and TAM Empreendimentos e Participações (“TEP”) signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)(“MOU”) in which the companies agreeagreed to proceed with their intention of carrying out their operations jointly under one parent company, to be named LATAM Airlines Group.Group S.A. (“LATAM”). The proposed partnership of LAN with TAMaffiliation would be within the world’s 10 largest airline groups. LATAM will providegroups, providing transport services for passengers and cargo to more than 115 destinations in 23 countries, operating with a fleet of over 300 aircraft, with over 40,00050,000 employees. Both airlines willwould continue operating independently with their current operating licenses and brands. Within the group, TAM will continue operating as a Brazilian company with its own structure. The current holding of LAN Airlines S.A. will operate as an independent business unit within the group. On October 20, 2010, LANthe Company and TAM announced that the operating subsidiaries of TAM had presented the structure of the transaction to the Brazilian Civil Aviation Agency (ANAC)(“ANAC”), which was approved by this agency on March 1, 2011.

On January 18, 2011 the parties of the MOU (1) and Mrs. Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, Maurício Rolim Amaro, Noemy Almeida Olivera Amaro and Joao Francisco Amaro (“Amaro Family”), as the only shareholders of TEP, signed binding contracts written in English called (a) anImplementation Agreement and (b) a bindingExchange Offer Agreement (“Contracts Signed”) containing the final terms and conditions of the proposed partnership between LANthe Company and TAM.

(1) On August 13, 2010 LAN reported as a significant matter to the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance that LAN, Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A. and Inversiones Mineras del Cantábrico S.A. (the last two, “Cueto subsidiaries”), TAM S.A. (“TAM”) and TAM Empreendimentos e Participacoes S.A. (“TEP”) signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) for which the primary terms were outlined.

On September 21, 2011, the Court of Defense of Free Competition (“TDLC”) approved the merger between LANthe Company and TAM, establishing fourteen14 mitigation measures. On October 3, 2011, LANthe Company and TAM filed an appeal to the Supreme Court objecting three ofto certain mitigation measures. On April 5, 2012, the mitigation measures.Supreme Court confirmed the TDLC resolution rejecting the appeal filed by both companies.

On December 21, 2011, the Board of LANthe Company cited a special meeting of shareholders, citation was performedcarried out on November 11, 2011, in which LANtheir shareholders approved, among others, the following matters:

(a) The merger of LAN with Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A. and companies (the “Absorbed Companies”), two companies specially constituted for the purpose of the association between LAN and TAM;

(b)The change of name and the other transactions contemplated in contracts.

(a)The merger of the Company with Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A. companies (the “Absorbed Companies”), two companies specially constituted for the purpose of the association between the Company and TAM;

 

F-1-8


LOGO

(b)The change of Company name and the rest of the transactions contemplated in the subscribed contracts.

 

(c)The increase in capital by US$ 1,465,372,970.09 by issuing 147,355,882 common shares without par value of which:

(c) The increase in capital by US$ 1,465,372,970.09 by issuing 147,355,882 common shares without par value of which:

(i)US$ 1,417,639,617.60 through the issuance of 142,555,882 shares, which would be intended to be exchanged for shares of the Absorbed Companies as a result of the proposed merger, at a rate of 0.9 new shares of the Company for each share that is fully subscribed and paid for each of the Absorbed Companies, and that belongs to shareholders other than the Company’s. The shares that the Company holds in the acquired companies at the time of the merger, shall have no effect; and

(i) US$ 1,417,639,617.60 through the issue of 142,555,882 shares, which are intended to be exchanged for shares of the Absorbed Companies as a result of the proposed Merger, at a rate of 0.9 new shares of LAN for each share that is fully subscribed and paid for each of the absorbed companies, and that belongs to shareholders other than LAN. LAN shares that holds in the acquired companies at the time to perfect the Merger, shall have no effect;

(ii) US$ 47,733,352.49 through the issuance of 4,800,000 shares, which will go towards compensation plans for employees of the Company and its subsidiaries,
(ii)US$ 47,733,352.49 through the issuance of 4,800,000 shares, which would go towards compensation plans for employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as provided in Article 24 of the Corporations Law.

The effectiveness of these agreements was subject to compliance with the conditions established in the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting.

On May 10, 2012, the Company and Holdco II initiated the exchange offer of TAM shares. Having complied with the conditions for declaring the exchange offer successful and having received 95.9% of the total shares of TAM in circulation, on June 22, 2012, the Company and the Absorbed Companies granted the execution deed of Merger, through which the shares of the Absorbed Companies were exchanged for shares of the Company, as effected according to that described above. On that same date the change of the Company’s name to “LATAM Airlines Group S.A.” became effective. The execution deed was rectified by instrument dated July 10, 2012.

On September 4, 2012 the Board of the Company cited a special meeting of shareholders, carried out on August 3, 2012 in which their shareholders approved, among others, the following matters:

a)Total revocation of the Board and election of the new Board of the Company.

b)Approval that the remaining 7,436,816 LATAM shares, out of the total 142,555,882 shares issued under the authorization of the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on December 21, 2011, and that were not to be exchanged for shares of the Sister Holdco SA and Holdco II SA, would be defined to be offered preferably to LATAM shareholders under Article 25 of the Corporations Law and that the unsubscribed balance would be offered and placed on the market in general.

c)Authorization of the Board of the Company to agree and proceed with the broadest powers, the terms of the issue and placement of the referred remaining shares and delegation to the Board of the Company the authority to determine, fix and agree freely and with broadest powers the placement price of the shares in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 28 of the Corporate Regulations.

d)Delegation to the Board of the Company the authority to determine, fix and agree freely and with the broadest powers the placement price of 4,800,000 shares defined under the Extraordinary Shareholders meeting dated December 21, 2011 to the compensation in terms of Article 24 of the Corporations Law, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 28 of the Corporations Regulations, and determine the terms and conditions applicable to the latter.

The placement of the shares referred to in paragraph (b) above was approved by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, on December 11, 2012. On December 20, 2012, the Board of Directors agreed to start, from December 21, 2012, at the period of preferred option of those shares and proceeded to fix the price of placement of them, all of which was reported to the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance by Essential Matter on the same date. The Information on the result of this placement is available in Note 40 on Subsequent Events.

The Company is located in Santiago, Chile, at Avenida Américo Vespucio Sur No. 901, commune of Renca.

Corporate Governance practices of the Company are set in accordance with Securities Market Law 18,045 the Corporations Law 18,046 and its regulations, and the regulations of the SVS and the laws and regulations of the United States of America and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)(“SEC”) of that country, with respect to the issuance of ADRs, and the Federal Republic of Brazil and the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (“CVM”) of that country, as it pertains to the issuance of Brazilian Depositary Receipts (“BDRs”).BDRs.

The Board of the Company is composed of nine members who are elected every two years by the ordinary shareholdersshareholders’ meeting. The Board meets in regular monthly sessions and in extraordinary sessions as the corporate needs demand. Of the nine board members, three form part of its Directors’ Committee which fulfills both the role foreseen in the Corporations Law and the functions of the Audit Committee required by the Sarbanes Oxley ActLaw of the United States of America and the respective regulations of the SEC.

The majority shareholder of the Company is the Cueto Group, which through Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., Inversiones Mineras del Cantábrico S.A. and its Subsidiaries, Inversiones Nueva Costa Verde Aeronáutica Limitada, Costa Verde Aeronáutica., Spa owns 33.91%25.92% of the shares issued by the Company, and therefore is the controllercontrolling shareholder of the Company in accordance with the provisions of the letter b) of Article 97 and Article 99 of the Securities Market Law, given that despite not meeting the majority of votes at shareholders’ meeting or having the power to elect a majority of the directors of the Company, there is a decisive influence inon its administration.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the Company had a total of 1,6821,660 registered shareholders, and 2.99%shareholders. At that date approximately 6.16% of the Company’s share capital was in the form of ADRs.ADRs and approximately 1.36% in the form of BDRs.

For the year ended December 31, 2011 theThe Company had an average of 20,87022,214 employees endingin the first semester of 2012 and 53,167 employees in the second semester of 2012, caused by Business Combination with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries. Ended this year with a total of 21,838 people, with 4,17053,599 employees, spread over 8,980 administrative employees, 6,932 in administration, 2,918Maintenance, 18,138 in maintenance, 6,194Operations, 10,164 in operations, 3,837 cabin crew, 1,969 pilots,Cabin Crew, 4,527 in Controls Crew, and 2,7504,858 in sales.

F-1-9


LOGOSales.

The significant operating subsidiaries included in these consolidated financial statements are as follows:

 

a) As of December 31, 2012a) As of December 31, 2012                 
 Participation rate Statement of financial position Results for the period 
 As of December 31, 2012 As of December 31, 2012 Ending December 31, 2012 
 Direct   Indirect Total         
           As of December 31, 2011   As of December 31, 2010  Country Functional ownership   ownership ownership       Net 

Tax No.

  

Company

  Country
of origin
  Functional
Currency
  Direct
ownership
interest
   Indirect
ownership
interest
   Total
ownership
interest
   Direct
ownership
interest
   Indirect
ownership
interest
   Total
ownership
interest
  

Company

 of origin Currency interest   interest interest Assets Liabilities Equity Income 
 %   % % ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 
           %   %   %   %   %   % 
96.518.860-6  Lantours Division de Servicios Terrestres S.A. (*)  Chile  US$   99.9900     0.0100     100.0000     99.9900     0.0100     100.0000   

Lantours Division de Servicios
Terrestres S.A. And Subsidiaries (****)

 Chile US$  99.9900     0.0100    100.0000    2,678    2,153    525    1,300  
96.763.900-1  Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica S.A.  Chile  US$   99.0100     0.9900     100.0000     99.0100     0.9900     100.0000   Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica S.A. Chile US$  99.0100     0.9900    100.0000    57,227    23,029    34,198    17,719  
96.969.680-0  Lan Pax Group S.A. and Subsidiaries  Chile  US$   99.8361     0.1639     100.0000     99.8361     0.1639     100.0000   Lan Pax Group S.A. and Subsidiaries (*) Chile US$  99.8361     0.1639    100.0000    522,408    637,851    (112,395  (77,269
Foreign  Lan Peru S.A.  Peru  US$   49.0000     21.0000     70.0000     49.0000     21.0000     70.0000   Lan Perú S.A. Peru US$  49.0000     21.0000    70.0000    159,361    150,319    9,042    2,513  
Foreign  Lan Chile Investments Limited and Subsidiaries  Caymán Islands  US$   99.9900     0.0100     100.0000     99.9900     0.0100     100.0000   Lan Chile Investments Limited and Subsidiaries (*) Cayman Islands US$  99.9900     0.0100    100.0000    4,419    5,247    (828  (10
93.383.000-4  Lan Cargo S.A.  Chile  US$   99.8939     0.0041     99.8980     99.8939     0.0041     99.8980   Lan Cargo S.A. Chile US$  99.8939     0.0041    99.8980    727,091    371,663    355,428    (50,693
Foreign  Connecta Corporation  U.S.A  US$   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Connecta Corporation U.S.A US$  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    234    2,041    (1,807  70  
Foreign  Prime Airport Services Inc. and Subsidiary  U.S.A  US$   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Prime Airport Services Inc. and Subsidiary (*) U.S.A US$  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    24,678    29,484    (4,806  1,174  
96.951.280-7  Transporte Aéreo S.A.  Chile  US$   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Transporte Aéreo S.A. Chile US$  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    357,725    114,302    243,423    11,144  
96.634.020-7  Ediciones Ladeco América S.A.  Chile  CLP   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Ediciones Ladeco América S.A. Chile CLP  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    —      612    (612  —    
Foreign  Aircraft International Leasing Limited  U.S.A  US$   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Aircraft International Leasing Limited U.S.A US$  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    —      2,799    (2,799  (5
96.631.520-2  Fast Air Almacenes de Carga S.A.  Chile  CLP   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Fast Air Almacenes de Carga S.A. Chile CLP  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    9,708    1,553    8,155    2,067  
96.631.410-9  Ladeco Cargo S.A.  Chile  CLP   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Ladeco Cargo S.A. Chile CLP  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    416    11    405    3  
Foreign  Laser Cargo S.R.L.  Argentina  ARS   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Laser Cargo S.R.L. Argentina ARS  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    70    228    (158  (42
Foreign  Lan Cargo Overseas Limited and Subsidiaries  Bahamas  US$   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Lan Cargo Overseas Limited and Subsidiaries (*) Bahamas US$  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    364,482    397,611    (37,368  (6,375
96.969.690-8  Lan Cargo Inversiones S.A. and Subsidiary  Chile  CLP   0.0000     100.0000     100.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000   Lan Cargo Inversiones S.A. and Subsidiary (*) Chile CLP  0.0000     100.0000    100.0000    57,154    64,905    (8,692  (4,458
96.801.150-2  Blue Express INTL S.A. and Subsidiary  Chile  CLP   0.0000     0.0000     0.0000     0.0000     100.0000     100.0000  
96.575.810-0  Inversiones Lan S.A. and Subsidiaries  Chile  CLP   99.7100     0.0000     99.7100     99.7100     0.0000     99.7100   Inversiones Lan S.A. and Subsidiaries (*) Chile CLP  99.7100     0.0000    99.7100    16,181    9,714    6,466    (112
Foreign TAM S.A. y Filiales (*) (**) (***) Brazil BRL  63.0901     36.9099    100.0000    8,292,729    7,457,501    814,098    (45,163

 

(*)Comercial MasterhouseThe Equity reported corresponds to Equity attributable to owners of the parent, does not include Non-controlling interest.
(**)The indirect participation percentage over TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries comes from Holdco I S.A., entity for which LATAM Airlines Group S.A. holds a 99.9983% participation.
(***)LATAM Airlines Group S.A. owns 226 voting shares of Holdco I S.A., equivalent to 19.42% of total voting shares of that company.
(****)On November 22, 2012, by public deed in July 2010, changed its namethe Notary of Santiago of Mr. Patricio Rabiy Benavente, Lantours División Servicios Terrestres II S.A. was incorporated, which corresponds 99.99% to Lantours División de Servicios Terrestres S.A. and 0.01% to Inversiones Lan S.A., entity without movement.

b) As of December 31, 2011                         
                  Statement of financial position  Results for the period 
         As of December 31, 2011  As of December 31, 2011  ended December 31, 2011 
         Direct  Indirect  Total             
     Country Functional ownership  ownership  ownership           Net 

Tax No.

  

Company

 of origin Currency interest  interest  interest  Assets  Liabilities  Equity  Income 
         %  %  %  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

96.518.860-6

  Lantours Division de Servicios Terrestres S.A. Chile US$  99.9900    0.0100    100.0000    2,534    1,749    785    860  

96.763.900-1

  Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica S.A. Chile US$  99.0100    0.9900    100.0000    65,580    34,101    31,479    3,484  

96.969.680-0

  Lan Pax Group S.A. and Subsidiaries (*) Chile US$  99.8361    0.1639    100.0000    464,789    502,284    (41,935  (28,163

Foreign

  Lan Perú S.A. Peru US$  49.0000    21.0000    70.0000    139,888    128,979    10,909    920  

Foreign

  Lan Chile Investments Limited and Subsidiaries (*) Cayman Islands US$  99.9900    0.0100    100.0000    4,420    5,238    (818  1,820  

93.383.000-4

  Lan Cargo S.A. Chile US$  99.8939    0.0041    99.8980    765,829    343,799    422,030    57,140  

Foreign

  Connecta Corporation U.S.A US$  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    346    2,223    (1,877  (109

Foreign

  Prime Airport Services Inc. and Subsidiary (*) U.S.A US$  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    9,965    15,945    (5,980  (735

96.951.280-7

  Transporte Aéreo S.A. Chile US$  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    348,943    116,663    232,280    26,146  

96.634.020-7

  Ediciones Ladeco América S.A. Chile CLP  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    —      566    (566  —    

Foreign

  Aircraft International Leasing Limited U.S.A US$  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    —      2,794    (2,794  (8

96.631.520-2

  Fast Air Almacenes de Carga S.A. Chile CLP  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    24,692    11,372    13,320    1,998  

96.631.410-9

  Ladeco Cargo S.A. Chile CLP  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    380    8    372    1  

Foreign

  Laser Cargo S.R.L. Argentina ARS  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    82    216    (134  (18

Foreign

  Lan Cargo Overseas Limited and Subsidiaries (*) Bahamas US$  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    162,002    189,614    (30,990  9,037  

96.969.690-8

  Lan Cargo Inversiones S.A. and Subsidiary (*) Chile CLP  0.0000    100.0000    100.0000    67,194    69,671    (2,477  3,070  

96.575.810-0

  Inversiones Lan S.A. and Subsidiaries (*) Chile CLP  99.7100    0.0000    99.7100    14,299    7,821    6,478    (347

 

F-1-10
(*)The Equity reported corresponds to Equity attributable to owners of the parent, does not include non-controlling interest.


LOGO

Additionally, the Company has proceeded to consolidate certain special purpose entities, denominated: JOL, destined to the aircraft financing and Chercán Leasing Limited, destined to the aircraft advance financing, as the Company has major risks and benefits associated to them according to standards issued by the Standing Interpretations Committee of the International Accounting Standards:Information: Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities (“SIC 12”) and private investment funds in which the parent company and subsidiaries are contributors.

All the entities controlled have been included in the consolidation.

Changes in the scope of consolidation between January 1, 20102011 and December 31, 2011,2012, are detailed below:

 

(1)Incorporation or acquisition of companies

 

Florida West Technical Services LLC., direct subsidiary of Prime Airport Services S.A., in April 2010, changed its name to Lan Cargo Repair Station, LLC.

Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A., indirect subsidiary of Lan Pax Group S.A., in November 2010, was acquired through the purchase of companies Akemi Holdings S.A. and Saipan Holdings S.A. (See Note 39)

AEROASIS S.A., direct subsidiary of Lan Pax Group S.A, was acquired in February 2011.2011 (See Note 39)18.2).

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries became part of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. as of June 22, 2012 date on which merger was materialized with the companies Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A. (see Note 18.2).

 

(2)Disposal of companies

 

Blue Express INTL Ltda. and subsidiary, direct subsidiary ofSubsidiaries, dated April 6, 2011 Lan Cargo S.A. and Inversiones Lan S.A., were sold according tosubsidiaries of LATAM Airline Group S.A., as sellers, and Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Inversiones Betmin SpA, subsidiaries of the Bethia S.A. company, as buyers, entered into a purchase agreement signed on April 6, 2011.in respect to 100% of the share capital of Blue Express INTL Ltda. and its subsidiary Blue Express S.A. The sales value of Blue Express INTL Ltda and subsidiary was ThUS$ 53,386, the book value of the investment at March 2011 was ThUS$ 9,061, the sale generated a profit of approximately ThUS$ 44,325, which is reflected in Other gain (loss) in the Consolidated income statement.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following describes the principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements.

 

2.1.Preparation

The consolidated financial statements of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. are for the yearperiod ended December 31, 20112012 and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and IFRIC interpretations.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historic-cost criterion, although modified by the valuation at fair value of certain financial instruments.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to use its judgment in applying the Company’s accounting policies. Note 4 shows the areas that imply a greater degree of judgment or complexity or the areas where the assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements.

F-1-11


LOGO

(a) AtIn order to facilitate comparison, there have been some minor reclassifications to the date of these consolidated financial statements corresponding to the following accountingprevious year.

(a) Accounting pronouncements were adopted by the Company, with applicationimplementation effective as offrom January 1, 2011:2012:

 

Standards and amendments

  

Mandatory
application:
annual

Annual periods
beginning on or after

Amendment to IAS 32: Financial instruments: Presentations

02/01/2010

IFRS 3 revised: Business combinations

07/01/2010

Amendment to IAS 27: Consolidated and separate financial statements

07/01/2010

IFRS 1: First-time adoptions

07/01/2010

Amendment to IFRS 1: First-time adoptions

07/01/2011

IFRS 7: Financial instruments: Disclosures

01/01/2010

Amendment to IFRS 7: Financial Instruments: Disclosures

Issued in October 2010, increases the disclosure requirements for transactions involving transfers of financial assets. Comparative information for the first year of implementation is not required.

  07/01/2011

Standards and amendments

Mandatory

application:

Annual periods
beginning on or after

Amendment to IAS 34: Interim financial reporting12: Income tax

This amendment, issued in December 2010, provides an exception to the general principles of IAS 12 for investment properties that are measured using the fair value contained in IAS 40 “Investment Property”. The exception also applies to investment property acquired in a Business Combination if after the Business Combination the acquirer applies the fair value contained in IAS 40. The amendment incorporates the presumption that investment property valued at fair value, are made by sale, so it requires apply to the temporary differences arising from these, the tax rate for sales operations. Early adoption is permitted.

  01/01/2011

Amendment to IAS 1: Presentation of financial statements

01/01/2011

IAS 24 revised: Related party disclosures

01/01/2011

Interpretation

Mandatory application:
annual periods
beginning on or after

IFRIC 19: Extinguishing financial liabilities with equity Instruments

07/01/2010

Amendment to IFRIC 13: Customer loyalty programs

01/01/2011

Amendment to IFRIC 14: Pre-payments of a minimum funding requirement

01/01/20112012

The adoption of the standards, amendments and interpretations described above have not had a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(b) Accounting pronouncements with applications effective as of January 1, 20122013 and following:

 

Standards and amendments

  

Mandatory
application:
annual

Annual periods
beginning on or after

Amendment to IAS 12: Income taxes

01/01/2012

Amendment to IAS 1: Presentation of financial statements

Issued in June 2011. The main change in this amendment requires that items of Other Comprehensive Income are classified and grouped evaluating if they potentially will be reclassified to results in future periods. Early adoption is permitted.

  07/01/2012

IAS 28: Investments in associates and joint ventures

01/01/2013

IAS 27: Separate financial statements

Issued in May 2011, replaces IAS 27 (2008). The scope of this standard is restricted beginning with this change only for separate financial statements, as the aspects related to the definition of control and consolidation were removed and included in IFRS 10. Early adoption is permitted in conjunction with IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12 and the amendment to IAS 28.

  01/01/2013

Standards and amendments

Mandatory
application:

Annual periods
beginning on or after

Amendment IFRS 7: Financial Instruments: Disclosures

Issued in December 2011. Requires improvement of current disclosures over compensation of financial assets and liabilities, with the aim of increasing convergence between IFRS and USGAAP. These revelations are focused on quantitative information over the financial instruments recognized that offset in the Statement of Financial Position. Early adoption is permitted.

01/01/2013

IFRS 10: Consolidated financial statements

Issued in May 2011, replaces SIC 12 “Consolidation of special purpose entities” and orientation on control and consolidation in IAS 27 “Consolidated Financial Statements”. Sets clarifications and new parameters for the definition of control, and the principles for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Early adoption is permitted in conjunction with IFRS 11, IFRS 12 and amendments to IAS 27 and 28.

  01/01/2013

IFRS 11: Joint arrangements

Issued in May 2011, replaces IAS 31 “Interests in Joint Ventures” and SIC 13 “Jointly controlled entities”. Provides a more realistic reflection of joint arrangements by focusing on rights and obligations arising from the agreements rather than their legal form. Within its modifications include the elimination of the concept of jointly controlled assets and the possibility of proportional consolidation of entities under joint control. Early adoption is permitted in conjunction with IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and amendments to IAS 27 and 28.

  01/01/2013

IFRS 12: Disclosures of interests in other entities

Issued in May 2011, brings together in one standard all required disclosures in the financial statements related to investments in other entities, whether they are classified as subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures. Applicable for entities that hold investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures, and associates. Early adoption is permitted in conjunction with IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and amendments to IAS 27 and 28.

  01/01/2013

Standards and amendments

Mandatory
application:

Annual periods
beginning on or after

IFRS 13: Fair value measurement

01/01/2013

AmendmentIssued in May 2011, brings together in one standard the way to IAS 19: Employee benefitsmeasure the fair value of assets and liabilities and disclosures required on it, and incorporates new concepts and explanations for measurement.

  01/01/2013

IAS 19 Revised: Employee benefits

Issued in June 2011, replaces IAS 19 (1998). This revised standard changes the recognition and measurement of costs for defined benefit plans and termination benefits. Additionally, it includes modifications to disclosures for all employee benefits.

01/01/2013

Amendment to IAS 32: Financial instruments: Presentation

Issued in December 2011. Clarifies the requirements for off-setting financial assets and liabilities in the Statement of Financial Position. Specifically, that the right to compensation should be available at the reporting date and not depend on a future event. It also indicates that it must be legally binding upon both counterparties in the normal course of business, as well as in the case of default, insolvency or bankruptcy. Early adoption is permitted.

01/01/2014

IFRS 9: Financial instruments

Issued in December 2009, amending the classification and measurement of financial assets.

Later this standard was amended in November 2010 to include treatment and classification of financial liabilities. Early adoption is permitted.

  01/01/2015

InterpretationImprovements issued in May 2012

  Mandatory application:
annual periods
beginning on or after

IFRIC 20: Stripping costs in the production phase

IAS 1: Presentation of mine

financial statements – Clarifies requirements for comparative information when an entity has a 3rd Statement of Financial Position column.
   01/01/2013  
IAS 16: Property plant and equipment - Clarifies that the parts and service equipment will be classified as Property, plant and equipment rather than inventory, as it meets the definition of Property, plant and equipment.
IAS 32: Financial instrument: Presentation - Clarifies the treatment income tax distributions and related transaction costs.

IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting - Clarifies the disclosure requirements of segment assets and liabilities in interim periods, confirming the same requirements applicable to annual financial statements.

Amendments to IFRS 10: Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11: Joint Arrangements and IFRS 12: Disclosure of interests in other entities. Issued in June 2012. Clarifies the transitional provisions for IFRS 10, indicating that it is necessary to apply the first day of the annual period in adopting the rule. Therefore, it may be necessary to make modifications to the comparative information presented in this period, if the evaluation of the control over investments differs from that recognized in accordance with IAS 27/SIC 12.

IAS 27: Separate Financial Statements and IFRS 10: Consolidated Financial Statements and IFRS 12: Disclosure of interests in other entities - issued in October 2012. The modifications include the definition of an investment entity and introduce an exception to consolidate certain subsidiaries pertaining to investment entities. This amendment requires an entity to measure the investment of these subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss according to IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” in the consolidated and separate financial statements. The amendment also introduces new disclosure requirements on investment firms in IFRS 12 and IAS 27.

01/01/2014

The Company’s management believes that the adoption of the standards, amendments and interpretations described above would not have had a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the year of their first application. The Company has not early adopted any of the above standards.

F-1-12


LOGO

2.2.Consolidation

(a) Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all the entities (including special-purpose entities) over which the Company has the power to control the financial and operating policies, which are generally accompanied by a holding of more than half of the voting rights. In evaluating whether the Company controls another entity, the existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible at the date of the consolidated financial statements are considered. The subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is passed to the Company and they are excluded from the consolidation on the date they cease to be so controlled. The results and flows are incorporated from the date of acquisition.

The Company uses the acquisition-costacquisition method or purchase accounting for the purchase of subsidiaries. The cost of acquisition is the fair value of the assets delivered, the equity instruments issued and the liabilities incurred or assumed on the exchange date. The identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combinationBusiness Combination are initially valued at their fair value on the date of acquisition, regardless of the extent of the non-controlling interests. The excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the Company’s holding in the net identifiable assets acquired is shown as goodwill.Goodwill. If the cost is less than the fair value of the net assets of the acquired subsidiary, the difference is recorded directly in the consolidated statement of income (Note 2.6). The transaction costs in a Business Combination are recognized in the consolidated income statement when they are incurred.

Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between the Company’s entities are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment loss of the asset transferred. When necessary in order to ensure uniformity with the policies adopted by the Company, the accounting policies of the subsidiaries are modified.

(b) Transactions with non-controlling interests

The Company applies the policy of considering transactions with non-controlling interests, when not related to loss of control, as equity transactions without an effect on income.

(c) Sales of subsidiaries

When a subsidiary is sold and a percentage of participation is not retained, the Company derecognizes assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, the non-controlling and other components of equity related to the subsidiary. Any gain or loss resulting from the loss of control is recognized in the consolidated income statement in Other gains (losses).

If LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries retain an ownership of participation in the sold subsidiary, and does not represent control, this is recognized at fair value on the date that control is lost, the amounts previously recognized in Other comprehensive income are accounted as if the Company had disposed directly from the assets and related liabilities, which can cause these amounts are reclassified to profit or loss. The percentage retained valued at fair value are subsequently accounted using the equity method.

(d) Investees or associates

Investees or associates are all entities over which LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries have a significant influence but hashave no control, thiscontrol. This usually arises from a holding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Investments in associates are booked using the equity method and are initially recordedrecognized at their cost.

The participation of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries in the losses or gains after the acquisition of its investees or associates is shown in results, and its participation in post acquisition movements in reserves of investees or associates are shown in reserves.

Post-acquisition movement is adjusted against the carrying amountbook value of the investment. When the participation of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries in the losses of an investee or associate is equal to or more than its holding in it, including any other non guaranteed account receivable, LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries will not show the additional losses unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the investee or associate.

Gains or losses for dilution in investees or associates are shown in the consolidated statement of income.

2.3. Foreign currency transactions

F-1-13


LOGO

2.3.Foreign currency transactions

(a) Presentation and functional currencies

The items included in the financial statements of each of the entities of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries are valued using the currency of the main economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). The functional currency of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. is the United States dollar which is also the presentation currency of the consolidated financial statements of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries.

(b) Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated to the functional currency using the exchange rates on the transaction dates. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from the liquidation of these transactions and from the translation at the closing exchange rates of the monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are shown in the consolidated statement of income.

(c) Group entities

The results and financial position of all the Group entities (none of which has the currency of a hyper- inflationaryhyper-inflationary economy) that have a functional currency other than the presentation currency are translated to the presentation currency as follows:

(i) Assets and liabilities of each consolidated statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing exchange rate on the consolidated statement of financial position date;

(i)Assets and liabilities of each consolidated statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing exchange rate on the consolidated statement of financial position date;

(ii) The revenues and expenses of each income statement account are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates,

(ii)The revenues and expenses of each income statement account are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates,

(iii) All the resultant exchange differences are shown as a separate component in Other comprehensive income.

(iii)All the resultant exchange differences are shown as a separate component in net equity.

The exchange rates used correspond to those fixed in the country where the subsidiary is located, whose functional currency is different to the U.S. dollar.

In the consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of a net investment in foreign entities (or local with a functional currency different to that of the parent), and of loans and other foreign currency instruments designated as hedges for these investments, are recorded within net equity. When the investment is sold, these exchange differences are shown in the consolidated statement of income as part of the loss or gain on the sale.

Adjustments to the goodwillGoodwill and fair value arising from the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and are translated at the closing exchange rate.

 

2.4.Property, plant and equipment

The land of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries is recognized at cost less any accumulated impairment loss. The rest of the property,Property, plant and equipment is shown,are measured, initially and subsequently, at historic cost less the corresponding depreciation and any impairment loss, except for certain land and minor equipment that are reassessed at first adoption, according to IFRS.loss.

The amounts of advance payments to aircraft manufacturers are capitalized by the Company under Construction in progress until receipt of the aircraft.

Subsequent costs (replacement of components, improvements, extensions, etc.) are included in the value of the initial asset or shown as a separate asset only when it is probable that the future economic benefits associated

F-1-14


LOGO

with the elements of property,Property, plant and equipment are going to flow to the Company and the cost of the element can be determined reliably. The value of the component replaced is written off in the books at the time of replacement. The rest of the repairs and maintenance are charged to the results of the year in which they are incurred.

Depreciation of property,Property, plant and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over their estimated technical useful lives; except in the case of certain technical components which are depreciated on the basis of cycles and hours flown.

The residual value and useful life of assets are reviewed, and adjusted if necessary, once per year.

When the carrying amount of an asset is higher than its estimated recoverable amount, its value is reduced immediately to its recoverable amount (Note 2.8).

Losses and gains on the sale of property,Property, plant and equipment are calculated by comparing the proceeds obtained with the book value and are included in the consolidated statement of income.

 

2.5.Intangible assets other than goodwill

Brands and airport Slots

Brands and airport Slots are intangible assets of indefinite useful life and are subject to impairment tests annually.

The airport slots correspond to an administrative authorization to carry out an operation of arrival and departure of aircraft at a specific airport, within a specified period.

Computer software

Licenses for computer software acquired are capitalized on the basis of the costs incurred in acquiring them and preparing them for using the specific software. These costs are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

Expenses related to the development or maintenance of computer software which do not qualify for capitalization, are shown as an expense when incurred. Certain costs directly related to the production of unique and identifiable computer software controlled by the Company, are shown as intangible assetsAssets others than Goodwill when they have met all the criteria for capitalization. The direct costs include the expenses of the personnel who develop the computer software and other costs directly associated.

Development costs of computer software shown as assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

 

2.6.Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the Company’s participation in the net identifiable assets of the subsidiary or associate on the acquisition date. Goodwill related to acquisition of subsidiaries is not amortized but tested for impairment annually and when there are indications that the carrying value may not be recoverable.annually. Gains and losses on the sale of an entity include the book amount of the goodwill related to the entity sold.

 

2.7.Borrowing costs

Interest costs incurred for the construction of any qualified asset are capitalized over the time necessary for completing and preparing the asset for its intended use. Other interest costs are charged to income and expenses.

2.8.Losses for impairment of non-financial assets

Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life, and developing IT projects, are not subject to amortization and are subject to annual testing for impairment losses. Assets subject to amortization are subjected to

F-1-15


LOGO

impairment tests whenever any event or change in circumstances indicates that the book value of the assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recorded when the book value is greater than the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. In evaluating the impairment, the assets are grouped at the lowest level for which cash flows are separately identifiable (CGUs). Non-financial assets other than goodwill that have suffered an impairment loss are subjected to a test once per year to check thatreviewed if there has been no reversalare indicators of the loss.reverse losses.

 

2.9.Financial assets

The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit and loss, loans and accounts receivablereceivables and financial assets held to maturity. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at the time of initial recognition, which occurs on the date of transaction.

(a) Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss

(a)Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss

Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss are financial instruments held for trading and those which have been designated as at fair value through profit or loss in their initial classification. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired mainly for the purpose of being sold in the near future or when these assets are managed and measured using fair value. Derivatives are also classified as acquired for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as cashCash and cash equivalents, held for trading, and other financial assets, designated on initial recognition.

(b) Loans and accounts receivable

(b)Loans and receivables

Loans and accounts receivablereceivables are non-derivative financial instruments with fixed or determinable payments not traded on an active market. These items are classified in current assets except for those with maturity over 12 months from the date of the consolidated statement of financial position, which are classified as non-current assets. Loans and accounts receivablereceivables are included in trade and other accounts receivable in the consolidated statement of financial position (Note 2.12).

(c) Financial assets held to maturity

(c)Financial assets held to maturity

Financial assets held to maturity are non-derivative financial instruments with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities that the Company’s management has the positive intention and capacity to hold until their maturity. Should the Company sell a not-insignificant amount of the financial assets held to their maturity, the whole category is reclassified as available for sale. These financial instruments held to maturity are included in non-current assets, except for those maturity equal to or less than 12 months from the consolidated statement of financial position, which are classified as other current financial assets.

Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value, and transaction costs are expensed in the income statement. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

Financial assets andThe financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans and receivables are subsequently carried at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Held to maturity investments are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest rate.

F-1-16


LOGO

At the date of each consolidated statement of financial position, the Company assesses if there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets may have suffered an impairment loss. For the case of financial assets held to maturity, if there is any evidence of impairment, the amount of the provision is the difference between the book value of the assets and the present value of the estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate.

 

2.10.Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities

Derivatives are booked initially at fair value on the date the derivative contracts are signed and later they continue to be valued at their fair value. The method for booking the resultant loss or gain depends on whether the derivative has been designated as a hedging instrument and if so, the nature of the item hedged. The Company designates certain derivatives as:

(a) Hedge of the fair value of recognized assets (fair value hedge);

(b) Hedge of an identified risk associated with a recognized liability or an expected highly-probablehighly- probable transaction (cash-flow hedge), or

(c) Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting.

The Company documents, at the inception of each transaction, the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as its objectives for managing risk and the strategy for carrying out various hedging transactions. The Company also documents its assessment, both at the beginning and on an ongoing basis, as to whether the derivatives used in the hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the items being hedged.

The total fair value of the hedging derivatives is booked as an other non-current financial asset or liability if the remaining maturity of the item hedged is over 12 months, and as an other current financial asset or liability if the remaining term of the item hedged is less than 12 months. Derivatives not booked as hedges are classified as otherOther financial assets or liabilities, current in the case that their remaining maturity is less than 12 months and non-current in the case that it is more than 12 months.liabilities.

(a) Fair value hedges

(a)Fair value hedges

Changes in the fair value of designated derivatives that qualify as fair value hedges are shown in the consolidated statement of income, together with any change in the fair value of the asset or liability hedged that is attributable to the risk being hedged.

(b) Cash flow hedges

(b)Cash flow hedges

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is shown in the statement of other comprehensive income. The loss or gain relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of income under Other gains (losses). Amounts accumulated in equity are reclassified to profit or loss in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss.

In the case of variable interest-rate hedges, the amounts recognized in the statement of otherOther comprehensive income are reclassified to results within financial costs at the same time the associated debts accrue interest.

For fuel price hedges, the amounts shown in the statement of otherOther comprehensive income are reclassified to results under the line item Cost of sales to the extent that the fuel subject to the hedge is used.

F-1-17


LOGO

For foreign currency hedges, the amounts recognized in the statement of Other comprehensive income are reclassified to income as deferred revenue resulting from the use of points, are recognized as income.

When hedging instruments mature or are sold or when they do not meet the requirements to be accounted for as hedges, any gain or loss accumulated in the statement of other comprehensive income until that moment remains in the statement of other comprehensive income and is reclassified to the consolidated statement of income when the hedged transaction is finally recognized. When it is expected that the hedged transaction is no longer going to occur, the gain or loss accumulated in the statement of other comprehensive income is taken immediately to the consolidated statement of income as Other“Other gains (losses).

(c) Derivatives not booked as a hedge

(c)Derivatives not booked as a hedge

Certain derivatives are not booked as a hedge. The changes in fair value of any derivative instrument that is not booked as a hedge are shown immediately in the consolidated statement of income in Other“Other gains (losses).

 

2.11.Inventories

Inventories, detailed in Note 10, are shown at the lower of cost and their net realizable value. The cost is determined on the basis of the weighted average cost method.method (WAC). The net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the normal course of business, less estimated costs necessary to make the sale.

 

2.12.Trade and other accounts receivable

Trade accounts receivable are shown initially at their fair value and later at their amortized cost in accordance with the effective interest rate method, less the allowance for impairment losses. An allowance for impairment loss of trade accounts receivable is made when there is objective evidence that the Company will not be able to recover all the amounts due according to the original terms of the accounts receivable.

The existence of significant financial difficulties on the part of the debtor, the probability that the debtor is entering bankruptcy or financial reorganization and the default or delay in making payments are considered indicators that the receivable has been impaired. The amount of the provision is the difference between the book value of the assets and the present value of the estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. The book value of the asset is reduced by the amount of the allowance and the loss is shown in the consolidated statement of income in Cost of sales. When an account receivable is written off, it is charged to the allowance account for accounts receivable.

 

2.13.Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and bank balances, time deposits in financial institutions, and other short-term and easily liquidatedhighly liquid investments.

 

2.14.Capital

The common shares are classified as net equity.

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of new shares or options are shown in net equity as a deduction from the proceeds obtained.received.

 

2.15.Trade and other accounts payables

Trade payables and other accounts payable are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost and are valued according to the method of the effective interest rate.

F-1-18


LOGO

2.16.Interest-bearing loans

Financial liabilities are shown initially at their fair value, net of the costs incurred in the transaction. Later, these financial liabilities are valued at their amortized cost; any difference between the proceeds obtained (net of the necessary arrangement costs) and the repayment value, is shown in the consolidated statement of income during the term of the debt, according to the effective interest rate method.

Financial liabilities are classified in current and non-current liabilities according to the contractual payment dates of the nominal principal.

 

2.17.Deferred taxes

Deferred taxes are calculated on the temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their book values. However, if the temporary differences arise from the initial recognition of a liability or an asset in a transaction different from a business combinationBusiness Combination that at the time of the transaction does not affect the accounting result or the tax gain or loss, they are not booked. The deferred tax is determined using the tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted at the end of the reporting period,consolidated financial statements close, and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realized or the deferred tax liability discharged.

Deferred tax assets are recognised when it is probable that there will be sufficient future tax earnings with which to compensate the temporary differences.

The Company does not record deferred tax on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, and associates, provided that the opportunity to reverse the temporary differences is controlled by the GroupCompany and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax on temporary differences arising on investments in associates is immaterial.

 

2.18.Employee benefits

(a) Personnel vacations

(a)Personnel vacations

The Company recognizes the expense for personnel vacations on an accrual basis.

(b) Share-based compensation

(b)Share-based compensation

The compensation plans implemented by the granting of options for the subscription and payment of shares are shown in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 2: Share based payments, showing the effect of the fair value of the options granted as a charge to remuneration on a straight-line basis between the date of granting such options and the date on which these become vested.

(c) Post-employment and other long-term benefits

(c)Post-employment and other long-term benefits

Provisions are made for these obligations by applying the method of the actuarial value of the accrued cost, and taking into account estimates of future permanence, mortality rates and future wage increases determined on the basis of actuarial calculations. The discount rates are determined by reference to market interest-rate curves. Actuarial gains or losses are shown in results for the yearperiod when they occur.

(d) Incentives

(d)Incentives

The Company has an annual incentives plan for its personnel for compliance with objectives and individual contribution to the results. The incentives eventually granted consist of a given number or portion of monthly remuneration and the provision is made on the basis of the amount estimated for distribution.

 

F-1-19


LOGO

2.19.Provisions

Provisions are recognised when:

 

(i)The Company has a present legal or implicit obligation as a result of past events.

 

(ii)It is probable that some payment is going to be necessary to settle an obligation, and

 

(iii)The amount has been reliably estimated.

Provisions are shown at the present value of the disbursements expected to be necessary for settling the obligation using the Company’s best estimates. The pre-tax discount rate used for determining the present value reflects current market evaluations on the date of the consolidated financial statements, time value of money, as well as the specific risks related to the liability in question.

 

2.20.Revenue recognition

Revenues include the fair value of the proceeds received or to be received on sales of goods and rendering services in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Revenues are shown net of refunds, rebates and discounts.

(a) Rendering of services

(a)Rendering of services

 

(i)Passenger and cargo transport

The Company shows revenue from the transportation of passengers and cargo once the service has been provided.

(ii)Frequent flyer program

The Company currently has a frequent flyer program, called Lan Pass, whose objective is customer loyalty through the delivery of kilometers or points fly withwhenever the Company or its alliance partners inprogram holders make certain flights, use the services of entities registered with the program or make purchases with an associated credit card. The kilometers or points earned can be exchanged for flight tickets or other services of associated entities.

The consolidated financial statements include liabilities for this concept (deferred income), according to the estimate of the valuation established for the kilometers or points accumulated pending use at that date, in accordance with IFRIC 13: Customer loyalty programs.

 

(iii)Other revenues

The Company records revenues for other services when these have been provided.

(b) Interest income

(b)Interest income

Interest income is booked using the effective interest rate method.

(c) Dividend income

(c)Dividend income

Dividend income is booked when the right to receive the payment is established.

 

F-1-20


LOGO

2.21.Leases

(a) When the Company is the lessee – financial lease

(a)When the Company is the lessee – financial lease

The Company leases certain property,Property, plant and equipment in which it has substantially all the risk and benefits deriving from the ownership; they are therefore classified as financial leases. Financial leases are capitalized at the start of the leaseinitially recorded at the lower of the fair value of the asset leased and the present value of the minimum lease payments.payments

Every lease payment is separated between the liability component and the financial expenses so as to obtain a constant interest rate over the outstanding amount of the debt. The corresponding leasing obligations, net of financial charges, are included in Other financial liabilities. The element of interest in the financial cost is charged to the consolidated statement of income over the lease period so that it produces a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each year. The asset acquired under a financial lease is depreciated over its useful life and is included in Property, plant and equipment.

(b) When the Company is the lessee – operating lease

(b)When the Company is the lessee – operating lease

Leases, in which the lessor retains an important part of the risks and benefits deriving from ownership, are classified as operating leases. Payments with respect to operating leases (net of any incentive received from the lessor) are charged in the consolidated statement of income on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

 

2.22.Non-current assets (oror disposal groups)groups classified as held for sale

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as assets held for sale are shown at the lesser of their book value and the fair value less costs to sell.

 

2.23.Maintenance

The costs incurred for scheduled major maintenance of the aircraft’s fuselage and engines are capitalized and depreciated until the next maintenance. The depreciation rate is determined on technical grounds, according to its use expressed in terms of cycles and flight hours.

The unscheduled maintenance of aircraft and engines, as well as minor maintenance, are charged to results as incurred.

 

2.24.  EnvironmentalEnvironmental costs

Disbursements related to environmental protection are charged to results when incurred.

NOTE 3 - FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

 

3.1.Financial risk factors

The Company’s activities are exposed to different financial risks: (a) market risk, (b) credit risk, and (c) liquidity risk. The Company’s global risk management program is focused on uncertainty in the financial markets and tries to minimize the potential adverse effects on the net margin. The Company uses derivatives to hedge part of these risks.

 

F-1-21


LOGO

(a) Market risk

(a)Market risk

Due to the nature of its operations, the Company is exposed to market risks such as:

(i) fuel-price risk, (ii) interest-rate risk, and (iii) local exchange-rate risk. In order to fully or partially hedge all of these risks, the Company operates with derivative instruments to fix or limit rises in the underlying assets.

 

(i)Fuel-price risk:

Fluctuations in fuel prices largely depend on the global supply and demand for oil, decisions taken by Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”), global refining capacity, stock levels maintained, and weather and geopolitical factors.

The Company purchases an aircraft fuel called Jet Fuel grade 54. There is a benchmark price in the international market for this underlying asset, which is US Gulf Coast Jet 54. However, the futures market for this asset has a low liquidity index and as a result the Company hedges its exposure using West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude, Brent (“BRENT”) crude and distillate Heating Oil (“HO”), which have a high correlation with Jet Fuel and are highly liquid assets and therefore have advantages in comparison to the use of the U.S. Gulf Coast Jet 54 index.

During 2011,the financial year 2012, the Company booked gainsrecognized losses of US$ 39.91.8 million on fuel hedging. During 2010,the same period 2011, the Company recognized gains of US$ 1.039.9 million for the same reason.

At December 31, 2011,2012, the market value of its fuel positions amounted to US$ 30.69.9 million (positive)(negative). At December 31, 2010,2011, this market value was US$ 45.830.6 million (positive).

The following tables show the notional value of the purchase positions together with the derivatives contracted for the different years:periods:

 

Positions as of December 31, 2011 (*)

  Maturities 
   Q112  Q212  Q312  Total 

Volume (thousands of barrels WTI)

   1,800    1,134    693    3,627  

Contracted future price (US$ per barril)(**)

   95    92    89    93  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total (ThUS$)

   171,000    104,328    61,677    337,311  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Approximate percentage of hedge (of expected consumption value)

   50  33  19  34

Positions as of December 31, 2012 (*)

  Maturities 
   Q113  Q213  Q313  Q413  Q114  Q214  Total 

Volume (thousands of barrels WTI)

   4,824    600    525    525    525    75    7,074  

Contracted future price (US$ per barrel)(**)

   104    117    119    119    100    93    107  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total (ThUS$)

   501,696    70,200    62,475    62,475    52,500    6,975    756,918  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Aproximate percentage of the hedge (of expected consumption value)

   61  7  6  6  6  1  19

 

(*)The volume shown in the table considers all the hedging instruments (swaps and options). The contracted future price considers the volume covered with swaps in addition to options that are expected to be exercised.Brent and WTI.
(**)Weighted average between collars and asset options when activated. Correspond to equivalent in WTI.

 

Positions as of December 31, 2010

  Maturities 

Positions as of December 31, 2011 (*)

  Maturities 
  Q111 Q211 Q311 Q411 Total   Q112 Q212 Q312 Total 

Volume (thousands of barrels WTI)

   1,848    918    687    324    3,777     1,800    1,134    693    3,627  

Contracted future price (US$ per barril)(*)

   82    81    84    90    83  

Contracted future price (US$ per barrel)(**)

   95    92    92    93  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total (ThUS$)

   151,536    74,358    57,708    29,160    313,491     171,000    104,328    63,756    337,311  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Approximate percentage of hedge (of expected consumption value)

   54  27  19  8  26   50  33  19  34

 

(*)The volume shown in the table considers all the hedging instruments (swaps and options) in WTI.
(**)Weighted average between collars and asset options, when activated.

F-1-22


LOGO

Sensitivity analysis

A drop in fuel price positively affects the Company through a reduction in costs. However, this drop also negatively affects contracted positions as these are acquired to protect the Company against the risk of a rise in price. The policy therefore is to maintain a hedge-free percentage in order to be competitive in the event of a drop in price.

AsDue to the fact that current positions do not represent changes in cash flows, but a variation in the exposure to the market value, the current hedge positions have no impact on income (they are booked as cash flow hedge contracts, so a variation in the fuel price has an impact on the Company’s net equity).

The following table shows the sensitivity analysis of the financial instruments according to reasonable changes in the fuel price and their effect on equity. The term of the projection was defined until the end of the last current fuel hedge contract, being the last business day of the thirdsecond quarter of 2012. 2014.

The calculations were made considering a parallel movement of US$ 5 per barrel in the curve of the WTI and BRENT crude futures benchmark price at December, 31, 20112012 and the end of December, 31, 2010.2011.

 

Bench marck price
(US$ per barrel)

  Positions as of December 31, 2011
effect on equity

(millions of US$)
   Positions as of December 31, 2010
effect on equity

(millions of US$)
 

+5

   +16.5     +16.7  

-5

   -13.8     -15.7  

Benchmark price

(US$ per barrel)

 

Positions as of December 31, 2012

effect on equity

(millions of US$)

 

Positions as of December 31, 2011

effect on equity

(millions of US$)

+ 5

 +12.6 +16.5

-5

 -11.3 -13.8

The Company seeks to reduce the risk of fuel price rises to ensure it is not left at a disadvantage compared to its competitors in the event of a sharp price fall. The Company therefore uses hedge instruments like swaps, call options and collars to partially hedge the fuel volumes consumed.

According toBeginning with the requirementsthird quarter of 2012 the company meets the required criteria of IAS 39, duringpresented to apply hedge accounting in respect of fuel hedging TAM society. Until June 30, 2012, the Company did not apply hedge accounting to fuel hedging instruments of TAM. During the periods presented years, the Company has not recorded amounts for ineffectiveness ininefectiveness within the consolidated income statement.

Given the fuel hedge structure during 2011,2012, which considers a hedge-free portion, a vertical fall by US$ 5 dollars in the WTI and BRENT benchmark price (the monthly daily average), would have meant a decreaseimpact of approximately US$ 42.591.0 million in the cost of total fuel consumption for the same period. For the same year,2012, a vertical rise by US$ 5 dollars in the WTI and BRENT benchmark price (the monthly daily average) would have meant an impact of approximately US$ 39.590.4 million of increased fuel costs for the same period.costs.

(ii) Cash flow interest-rate risk:

(ii)Cash flow interest-rate risk:

The fluctuation in interest rates depends heavily on the state of the global economy. An improvement in long-term economic prospects moves long-term rates upward while a drop causes a decline through market effects. However, if we consider government intervention in periods of economic recession, it is usual to reduce interest rates to stimulate aggregate demand by making credit more accessible and increasing production (in the same way interest rates are raised in periods of economic expansion).

The present uncertainty about how the market and governments will react, and thus how interest rates will change, creates a risk related to the Company’s debt at floating interest rates and its investments.

Cash flow interest rate risk equates to the risk of future cash flows of the financial instruments due to the fluctuation in interest rates on the market. The Company’s exposure to risks of changes in market interest rates is mainly related to long-term obligations with variable interest rates.

F-1-23


LOGO

In order to reduce the risk of an eventual rise in interest rates, the Company has signed interest-rate swap and call option contractscontracts. Currently a 62% of the debt is fixed to fluctuations in order to eliminate more than 82% of its exposure to interest-rate fluctuations. Theinterest rate. Therefore the Company is therefore exposed in one portion to a small portionthe variations of the fluctuations in theLondon Inter Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”) of 30 days, 90 days, 180 days and 360 days, London Inter Bank OfferBrazilian Interbank Deposit Certificate (“ILC”), and the Interest Rate (LIBOR)Term of Brazil (“TJLP”).

The following table shows the sensitivity of changes in financial obligations that are not hedged against interest-rate variations. These changes are considered reasonably possible based on current market conditions.

 

Increase (decrease) in
libor 3 months

  Positions as of December 31, 2011
effect on pre-tax earnings

(millions of US$)
   Positions as of December 31, 2010
effect on pre-tax earnings

(millions of US$)
  

Positions as of December 31, 2012

effect on pre-tax earnings

(millions of US$)

 

Positions as of December 31, 2011

effect on pre-tax earnings

(millions of US$)

+100 basis points

   -3.06     -1.18   -33.69 -3.06

-100 basis points

   +3.06     +1.18   +33.69 +3.06

Changes in market conditions produce a change in the valuation of current financial instruments hedging interest rates, causing an effect on the Company’s equity (because they are booked as cash-flow hedges). These changes are considered reasonably possible based on current market conditions. The calculations were made increasing (decreasing) vertically 100 basis points of the three-month Libor futures curve.

 

Increase (decrease) futures
curve in libor 3 months

  Positions as of December 31, 2011
effect on equity

(millions of US$)
 Positions as of December 31, 2010
effect on equity
(millions of US$)
  

Positions as of December 31, 2012

effect on equity

(millions of US$)

 

Positions as of December 31, 2011

effect on equity

(millions of US$)

+100 basis points

   40.70    42.39   +33.6 +40.7

-100 basis points

   (43.20  (45.35 -35.5 -43.2

There are limitations in the method used for the sensitivity analysis and relate to those provided by the market because the levels indicated by the futures curves are not necessarily met and will change in each year.period.

In accordance with the requirementsrequarements of IAS 39, during the yearperiods presented, the Company has not recorded amounts for ineffectiveness in the consolidated income statement.

(iii) Local exchange-rate risk:

(iii)Foreign exchange rate risk:

The functional currency used by the parent Company is the US dollar in terms of setting prices for its services, the composition of its statement of financial position and effects on its operating income. The Company sells most of its services in US dollars, or prices equivalent to the US dollar and aBrazilian real. A large part of its expenses are denominated in US dollars or equivalents to the US dollar, particularly fuel costs, aeronautic charges, aircraft leases, insurance and aircraft components and accessories. Remuneration expenses are denominated in local currencies.

The Company maintains its cargo and passenger business tariffs in US dollars. There is a mix in the domestic markets as sales in Peru are in local currency but the prices are indexed to the US dollar. In Brazil, Chile, Argentina and Argentina,Colombia the tariffs are in local currency without any kind of indexation. In the case of the domestic business in Ecuador, both tariffs and sales are in US dollar. The Company is therefore exposed to fluctuations in the different currencies, mainly: Brazilian real, Chilean peso, Argentine peso, Uruguayan peso, Paraguayan guaraní, Mexican peso, Euro, Esterling libra, Peruvian sol, Brazilian real, Colombian peso, Australian dollar and New Zealand dollar; ofdollar. Of these currencies, the largest exposure is in Chilean pesos.presented by chilean peso and brazilian real.

The Company manages its exposure to foreign currency risk through hedging selected balances using forward exchange contracts.

The Company may enter into derivative contracts to protect the possible appreciation or depreciation of currencies against the functional currency of the Company.

In order to restructure derivative contracts in Brazil, in the first quarter of 2009, in the second quarter of 2010 and crossin the second quarter of 2011, a dollar deposit was required as a guaranteed collateral. As foreign currency swaps.deposits are not allowed in Brazil, a collar contract was made with a notional foreign currency equivalent to the amount of deposit to meet the requirement.

The notional value and market value of foreign currency derivative are presented below:

 

F-1-24

Foreign currency derivative

Position at December 31, 2012

Notional Value (MUS$)

+30.0

Market Value (MUS$)

0.00


LOGO

According the structure of the Company to convert financial liabilities, financial assets and account receivables of US dollars to Brazilian real, the results of the Company vary. The following table shows the variation of financial performance to appreciate or depreciate 10% exchange rate R$/US$:

 

Appreciation (depreciation)Effect at December 31, 2012

de R$/US$

MUS$

-10%

+404.19

+10%

-404.21

(b) Credit riskThe prices of frequent flyer points in the subsidiary Multiplus S.A. are denominated in US dollars. As functional currency is the Brazilian real, the sale of these points are assigned to variations in the exchange rate R$/US$. To decrease exposure, Multiplus S.A. contract rate collars.

The following table presents the notional amount and market value of derivatives exchange rate for each maturity date. The expiration date of the derivatives coincide with the probable date of collection points. The highly probable sale of the points are expected to be recognized in income after being exchanged, on average, six months later.

Foreign currency derivative Multiplus  Position at December 31, 2012 
  2013   Maturity
2014
   Total 

Notional Value (MUS$)

   +283.00     +18.00     +301.00  

Market Value (MUS$)

   -14.68     -0.55     -15.23  

Sensitivity exchange rate Multiplus S.A.

If the Brazilian real appreciates or depreciates by 10% against the US dollar and all other variables are held constant, the financial results would have varied approximately MUS$ 21.8/ MUS$ 28.2, mainly as the effect of gains or losses from exchange rate in the time value of derivatives, which are recognized immediately as equity.

Due to the functional currency of TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries is the Brazilian real, the Company presents effects by the exchange rate fluctuations in Other comprehensive income by converting the Statement of financial position and Income statement of TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries from their functional currency to the U.S. dollar, being these last currency the presentation currency of the consolidated financial statement of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries. The goodwill generated in the Business Combination is recognized as an asset of TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries in Brazilian real whose conversion to U.S. dollar also produces effects in Other comprehensive income. The following table shows the change in Other comprehensive income recognized in Total equity to appreciate or depreciate 10% exchange rate R$/US$:

Appreciation (depreciation)Effect at December 31, 2012

de R$/US$

MMUS$

-10%

+459.86

+10%

-376.25

Effects of exchange rate derivatives in the Financial Statements

The profit or loss caused by changes in the fair value of hedging instruments are segregated between intrinsic value and time value. The intrinsic value is the percentage of cash flow cash covered, initially shown in equity and later transferred to income, while the hedge transaction is recorded in income. The time value corresponds to the ineffective portion of cash flow hedge and is recognized in the financial results of the Company (Note 21).

(b)Credit risk

Credit risk occurs when the counterparty to a financial agreement or instrument fails to discharge an obligation due or financial instrument, leading to a loss in market value of a financial instrument (only financial assets, not liabilities).

The Company is exposed to credit risk due to its operative and financial activities, including deposits with banks and financial institutions, investments in other kinds of instruments, exchange-rate transactions and the contracting of derivative instruments or options.

(i) FinancialTo reduce the credit risk associated with operational activities, the Company has established credit limits to abridge the exposure of their debtors which are monitored permanently (mainly in case of operational activities in Brazil with travel agents).

As a way to mitigate credit risk related to financial activities, the Company requires that the counterparty to the financial activities remain at least investment grade by major Risk Assessment Agencies. Additionally the company has established maximum limits for investments which are monitored regularly.

(i)Financial activities

Cash surpluses that remain after the financing of assets necessary for the operation are invested according to credit limits approved by the Company’s Board, mainly in time deposits with different financial institutions, private investment funds, short-term mutual funds, and easily-liquidated corporate and sovereign bonds with short remaining maturities. These investments are booked as cashCash and cash equivalents and as investments held to maturity.Other current financial assets.

In order to reduce counterparty risk and to ensure that the risk assumed is known and managed by the Company, investments are diversified among different banking institutions (both local and international). The Company evaluates the credit standing of each counterparty and the levels of investment, based on (i)��their credit rating, (ii) the equity size of the counterparty, and (iii) investment limits according to the Company’s level of liquidity. According to these three parameters, the Company chooses the most restrictive parameter of the previous three and based on this, establishes limits for operations with each counterparty.

The Company has no guarantees to mitigate this exposure.

(ii) Operational activities

(ii)Operational activities

The Company has four large sales “clusters”: travel agencies, cargo agents, airlines and credit-card administrators. The first three are governed by IATA (InternationalInternational Air Transport Association),Association, international (“IATA”) organization comprising most of the airlines that represent over 90% of scheduled commercial traffic and one of its main objectives is to regulate the financial transactions between airlines and travel agents and cargo. When an agency or airline does not pay their debt, they are excluded from operating with IATA’s member airlines. In the case of credit-card administrators, they are fully guaranteed by 100% by the issuing institutions.

The exposure consists of the term granted, which fluctuates between 1 and 45 days.

One of the tools the Company uses for reducing credit risk is to participate in global entities related to the industry, such as IATA, Business Sales Processing (BSP)(“BSP”), Cargo Account Settlement Systems (“CASS”), IATA Clearing House (“ICH”) and banks (credit cards). These institutions fulfill the role of collectors and distributors between airlines and travel and cargo agencies. In the case of the Clearing House, it acts as an offsetting entity between airlines for the services provided between them. A reduction in term and implementation of guarantees has been achieved through these entities. Currently the sales invoicing of TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. related with travel agents and cargo agents for domestic transportation in Brazil is done directly by TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.

Credit quality of financial assets

The external credit evaluation system used by the Company is provided by IATA. Internal systems are also used for particular evaluations or specific markets based on trade reports available on the local market. The internal

F-1-25


LOGO

classification system is complementary to the external one, i.e. for agencies or airlines not members of IATA, the internal demands are greater. The

To reduce the credit risk associated with operational activities, the Company has established credit limits to abridge the exposure of their debtors which are monitored permanently (mainly in case of operational activities of TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. with travel agents).The bad-debt rate in the principal countries where the Company has a presence is insignificant.

(c) Liquidity risk

(c)Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk represents the risk that the Company has no funds to meet its obligations.

Because of the cyclical nature of the business, the operation, and its investment and financing needs related to the acquisition of new aircraft and renewal of its fleet, plus the financing needs related to market-risk hedges, the Company requires liquid funds to meet its payment obligations.

The Company therefore manages its cash and cash equivalents and its financial assets, matching the term of investments with those of its obligations. The Company’s policy is that the average term of its investments may not exceed the average term of its obligations. This cash and cash equivalents position is invested in highly-liquid short-term instruments through first-class financial entities.

The Company has future obligations related to financial leases, operating leases, maturities of other bank borrowings, derivative contracts and aircraft purchase contracts.

F-1-26


LOGO

Class of liability for the analysis of liquidity risk ordered by date of maturity as of December 31, 2012

 

                   More
than
  More
than
  More
than
  More               
                Up to  90 days  one to  three to  than               
Class of Debtor   Debtor Creditor   Creditor   90  to one  three  five  five     Amorti- Effective  Nominal  Nominal 

Liability

 Tax No. 

Debtor

 country Tax No. 

Creditor

 country Currency days  year  years  years  years  Total  

zation

 rate  value  rate 
                ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$    %  ThUS$  % 

Loans to
exporters

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.004.000-5 

BANCO DE CHILE

 Chile US$  30,331    —      —      —      —      30,331   Semiannual  2.17  30,000    2.17
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.006.000-6 

BCI

 Chile US$  35,102    —      —      —      —      35,102   Semiannual  1.70  35,000    1.70
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 76.645.030-K 

ITAU

 Chile US$  75,205    —      —      —      —      75,205   Quarterly  1.32  75,000    1.32
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.032.000-8 

BBVA

 Chile US$  102,770    —      —      —      —      102,770   Annual  1.83  102,000    1.79

Bank loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  181    195    214,373    —      —      214,749   —    2.57  214,373    2.57
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.030.000-7 

ESTADO

 Chile US$  —      45,430    —      —      —      45,430   Semiannual  1.76  44,848    1.74

Guaranteed
obligations

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  4,025    12,070    32,208    32,203    44,336    124,842   Quarterly  5.69  102,649    5.01
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$  12,945    34,730    36,019    6,757    —      90,451   Quarterly  3.42  87,448    3.37
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  4,209    12,695    24,726    15,597    19,493    76,720   Quarterly  4.96  66,148    4.41
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$  17,740    53,435    144,037    146,463    152,574    514,249   Quarterly  4.15  451,090    3.67
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

WELLS FARGO

 U.S.A. US$  48,067    144,221    383,034    380,772    1,207,825    2,163,919   Quarterly  2.57  1,959,463    1.76
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  11,508    34,628    93,287    94,699    217,034    451,156   Quarterly  2.71  409,908    2.10
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  5,405    16,281    44,085    45,085    119,771    230,627   Quarterly  1.39  220,449    0.85
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BTMU

 U.S.A. US$  2,876    8,680    23,567    24,190    77,456    136,769   Quarterly  1.73  128,222    1.13
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

APPLE BANK

 U.S.A. US$  1,410    4,262    11,576    11,898    38,593    67,739   Quarterly  1.71  63,480    1.11
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BANK OF AMERICA MERRIL LYNCH

 U.S.A. US$  3,714    11,194    30,188    30,703    111,059    186,858   Quarterly  1.97  172,789    1.26
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

DEVELOPMENT BANK OF JAPAN

 U.S.A. US$  2,309    6,958    18,759    19,079    68,662    115,767   Quarterly  1.98  107,072    1.27
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

DEUTSCHE BANK

 U.S.A. US$  5,777    17,413    46,958    47,790    109,099    227,037   Quarterly  3.35  190,000    3.35

Financial leases

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  7,260    17,848    38,443    26,596    1,865    92,012   Quarterly  3.71  85,491    3.42
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$  4,992    15,145    31,093    31,375    26,226    108,831   Quarterly  1.32  103,684    1.29
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  2,009    6,028    16,075    16,075    16,075    56,262   Quarterly  6.38  46,086    5.65
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

S.CHARTERED

 U.S.A. US$  1,849    5,676    —      —      —      7,525   Quarterly  1.31  7,462    1.31
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  15,604    46,825    124,870    122,783    51,501    361,583   Quarterly  5.29  314,261    4.70

Other loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BOEING

 U.S.A. US$  596    2,248    146,189    —      —      149,033   —    1.86  146,189    1.86
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$  3,539    10,733    29,473    15,214    —      58,959   Quarterly  2.08  58,960    2.08

Hedging
derivatives

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$  10,393    31,344    68,360    30,509    5,678    146,284   —    —      141,624    —    

Non-hedging
derivatives

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$  1,235    3,557    5,926    —      —      10,718   —    —      10,300    —    
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
     Total    411,051    541,596    1,563,246    1,097,788    2,267,247    5,880,928      5,373,996   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Class of liability for the analysis of liquidity risk ordered by date of maturity as of December 31, 2012

Class of
Liability

  

Debtor Tax No.

 

        Debtor        

 Debtor
country
 Creditor
Tax No.
 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90 days
 More
than 90
days to
one year
 More
than
one to
three
years
 More
than three
to five
years
 More
than five
years
 Total Amortization Effective
rate
 Nominal
rate
  Nominal
rate
                 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   % ThUS$  %

Bank loans

  02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$ 1,093 64,533 —   —   —   65,626 Quarterly 2.81%  50,322   2.81%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

CITIBANK

 Brazil US$ 26,520 5,945 —   —   —   32,465 At
Expiration
 4.03%  29,986   4.03%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DO BRASIL S.A

 Brazil US$ 45,946 118,821 —   —   —   164,767 At
Expiration
 5.35%  151,980   5.35%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO IBM S.A

 Brazil BRL 356 —   —   —   —   356 Semiannual 10.72%  92   10.72%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO ITAU BBA

 Brazil US$ 52,628 129,638 —   —   —   182,266 At
Expiration
 5.65%  163,391   5.65%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO SAFRA

 Brazil BRL/ US$ 18,893 15,391 861 —   —   35,145 Monthly/
At
Expiration
 7.69% / 
4.01%
  32,446   7.69% /
 4.01%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO UNIBANCO

 Brazil BRL 72 29 —   —   —   101 Monthly 8.94%  88   8.94%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO BRADESCO

 Brazil BRL —   28,563 —   —   —   28,563 At
Expiration
 3.34%  27,484   3.34%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

NCM - NEDER LANDSCHE CREDIET VERZEKERING MAATSCHAPPIJ

 Holland US$ 231 495 1,320 1,320 2,695 6,061 Monthly 0.96%  4,608   0.95%

Obligation with the public

  02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK

 U.S.A. US$ 27,009 87,902 191,720 480,708 1,028,161 1,815,500 At
Expiration
 8.60%  1,100,000   8.41%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DO BRASIL S.A

 Brazil BRL 42,222 271,490 —   —   —   313,712 Semiannual 8.96%  244,678   8.56%

Financial leases

  02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

AFS INVESTMENT IX LLC

 U.S.A. US$ 3,482 7,728 20,609 20,609 29,196 81,624 Monthly N/A  65,127   N/A
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

AIR CANADA

 U.S.A. US$ 3,521 9,350 —   —   —   12,871 Monthly N/A  12,750   N/A
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

AIRBUS FINANCIAL SERVICES

 U.S.A. US$ 3,689 10,105 28,056 28,642 23,687 94,179 Monthly 2.25%  87,033   2.25%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

AWAS

 U.S.A. US$ 5,957 14,958 9,418 —   —   30,333 Monthly N/A  17,617   N/A
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$ 775 1,919 5,445 5,983 11,867 25,989 Quarterly 1.50%  24,326   1.50%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 France US$ 2,938 8,487 19,824 19,476 45,939 96,664 Quarterly 3.84%  87,986   3.84%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

CITIBANK N.A

 England US$ 13,119 44,695 90,296 87,083 241,694 476,887 Quarterly 3.69%  451,284   3.69%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE - CIB

 U.S.A. US$ 5,392 14,164 70,758 11,728 20,603 122,645 Quarterly 2.29%  114,810   2.29%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE - CIB

 France US$ 20,355 50,931 132,830 124,825 184,734 513,675 Quarterly/
Semiannual
 2.01% / 
0.82%
  494,721   2.01% /
0.37%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

DVB BANK SE

 Germany US$ 3,482 10,103 25,845 —   —   39,430 Quarterly 2.89%  37,500   2.89%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

DVB BANK SE

 U.S.A. US$ 509 1,456 2,918 768 —   5,651 Monthly 2.25%  5,402   2.25%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION

 U.S.A. US$ 10,898 20,745 51,339 —   —   82,982 Monthly 2.59%  81,086   2.59%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

HSBC

 France US$ 1,601 4,427 12,000 12,302 43,975 74,305 Quarterly 1.70%  69,458   0.85%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

KFW IP EX-BANK

 Germany US$ 4,568 12,801 35,134 25,246 27,784 105,533 Monthly/
Quarterly
 2.11% /
2.21%
  97,770   2.11% /
2.21%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

NATIXIS

 France US$ 12,126 26,169 73,710 78,388 178,957 369,350 Quarterly/
Semiannual
 2.62% /
3.32%
  316,425   2.62% /
3.32%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

PK AIRFINANCE US, INC.

 U.S.A. US$ 3,618 9,773 27,406 38,907 48,681 128,385 Monthly 1.96%  117,092   1.96%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

WACAPOU LEASING S.A.

 Luxembourg US$ 1,340 1,835 4,332 3,569 15,599 26,675 Quarterly 2.42%  23,647   2.42%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

WELLS FARGO BANK NORTHWEST N.A.

 U.S.A. US$ 1,836 5,379 3,205 —   —   10,420 Monthly 1.98%  10,271   1.98%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE MILAN BRANCH

 Italy US$ 14,786 39,102 100,197 99,264 157,422 410,771 Quarterly 1.95%  380,025   1.95%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK

 U.S.A. US$ 661 1,654 4,481 4,589 8,956 20,341 Quarterly 0.88%  19,431   0.08%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DE LAGE LANDEN BRASIL S.A

 Brazil BRL 493 1,458 1,891 —   —   3,842 Monthly 7.51%  2,025   7.51%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO IBM S.A

 Brazil BRL 604 1,882 136 —   —   2,622 Monthly 10.58%  2,255   10.58%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

CISLATINA
ARRENDAMENTO MERCANTIL S.A

 Brazil BRL 41 13 —   —   —   54 Monthly 5.31%  53   5.31%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

HP FINANCIAL SERVICE

 Brazil BRL 177 529 93 —   —   799 Monthly 9.08%  747   9.08%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIETE AIR FRANCE

 France EUR 629 108 1,203 —   —   1,940 Monthly 6.82%  1,572   6.82%
   

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIETE GENERALE LEASING S.A

 Brazil BRL 2,766 —   —   —   —   2,766 Monthly 0.00%  2,520   0.00%

Other loans

  02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

COMPANHIA

BRASILEIRA DE MEIOS DE PAGAMENTO

 Brazil BRL 31,882 9,143 —   —   —   41,025 Monthly 2.20%  41,025   2.20%

Hedging derivatives

  02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

OTHERS

 Brazil US$ 4,008 9,353 1,963 —   —   15,324 —   0.00%  15,324   0.00%

Non-hedging derivatives

  02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

 Brazil 0-E 

OTHERS

 Brazil US$ 3,603 6,903 4,529 —   —   15,035 —   0.00%  15,035   0.00%
         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

  
      

Total

   373,826 1,047,977 921,519 1,043,407 2,069,950 5,456,679    4,399,392   
         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Class of liability for the analysis of liquidity risk ordered by date of maturity as of December 31, 2012

Class of
Liability

 Debtor
Tax No.
 

Debtor

 

Debtor
country

 Creditor
Tax No.
 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to 90
days
  More
than 90
days to
one year
  More
than one
to three
years
  More
than three
to five
years
  More
than five
years
  Total  Amortization Effective
rate
 Nominal
value
  Nominal
rate
 
                ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$    % ThUS$  % 

Trade and
other
accounts
payable

  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and
Subsidiaries

 Others —   

Others

 —   US$  555,290    82,049    —      —      —      637,339   —   —    637,339    —    
       CLP  5,761    —      —      —      —      5,761   —   —    5,761    —    
       BRL  432,693    31,190    —      —      —      463,883   —   —    463,883    —    
       BRL  29,758    8,860    —      —      —      38,618   —   —    38,618    —    
       BRL  5,389    14,480    —      —      —      19,869   Monthly 6.60%  19,668    6.60
 —        Others
currencies
  198,968    —      —      —      —      198,968   —   —    198,968    —    

Accounts
payable,
non-current

 —   

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Others —   

Others

 —   US$  —      —      18,000    —      —      18,000   —   —    18,000    —    
       US$  —      —      15,994    —      —      15,994   Quarterly 2.06%  15,541    2.06
       BRL  —      —      3,594    —      —      3,594   —   —    3,594    —    
       BRL  —      —      39,251    44,872    142,914    227,037   Monthly 6.60%  207,089    6.60

Accounts
payable
to
related
parties
currents

 —   

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Others 78.591.370-1 

Bethia S.A. y Filiales

 Chile CLP  14    —      —      —      —      14   —   —    —      —    
   Others 96.847.880-K 

Lufthansa Lan Technical Training S.A.

 Chile US$  237    —      —      —      —      237   —   —    —      —    
   Others 0-E 

Made in
Everywhere
Rep.
Com.Distr.Ltda

 Brazil BRL  23    —      —      —      —      23   —   —    —      —    
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
     

Subtotal of page

    1,228,133    136,579    76,839    44,872    142,914    1,629,337      1,608,461   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
                 
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
    Total consolidated    2,013,010    1,726,152    2,561,604    2,186,067    4,480,111    12,966,944      11,381,849   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Class of liability for the analysis of liquidity risk ordered by date of maturity as of December 31, 2011

 

Class of Liability

Debtor
Tax No.

Debtor

Debtor
country
Creditor
Tax No.
CreditorCreditor
country
CurrencyUp to
90 days
ThUS$

Guaranteed obligations

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EINGU.S.A.US $4,025
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECREDITEAGRICOLEFranceUS $21,249
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EPEFCOU.S.A.US $15,633
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EBNP PARIBASU.S.A.US $19,616
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EWELLS FARGOU.S.A.US $5,615
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECITIBANKU.S.A.US $13,585
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.036.000-KSANTANDERChileUS $5,436
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EJP MORGANU.S.A.US $4,692
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EBTMUU.S.A.US $2,227
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EAPPLEBANKU.S.A.US $757

Financial leases

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EINGU.S.A.US $7,332
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECREDITEAGRICOLEFranceUS $2,311
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECITIBANKU.S.A.US $1,809
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ES.CHARTEREDU.S.A.US $1,773
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EPEFCOU.S.A.US $4,204

Bank loans

89.862.200–2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.036.000-KSANTANDERChileUS $—  
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.004.000-5BANCODECHILEChileUS $292
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.006.000-6BCIChileUS $50,187
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.030.000-7ESTADOChileUS $—  
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.032.000-8BBVAChileUS $—  

Other loans

89.862.200–2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.036.000-KSANTANDERChileUS $1,145
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EBOEINGU.S.A.US $—  
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile—  OTHERS—  US $—  

Derivatives

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile—  OTHERS—  US $10,191

Non-hedging derivatives

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile—  OTHERS—  US $1,357

Accounts payable and

—  Lan Airlines S.A.

Other accounts payables

and subsidiariesSeveral—  sundry—  US $411,908
CLP15,408
Others78,245

Accounts payable, non-current

—  Lan Airlines S.A. and subsidiariesSeveral—  sundry—  US $—  

Accounts payable Related parties

—  Lan Airlines S.A. and subsidiariesSeveral96.847.880-KLufthansaLan
Technical Training
S.A.
—  US $147
Several96.921.070-3Austral sociedad
Concesionaria S.A.—  CLP2
Several78.591.370-1Bethia S.A. and
subsidiaries
—  C LP116
SeveralForeingInversora Aeronaútica
Argentina—  US $102

Total

679,364

Class of Liability

  More than
90 days
to one year
   More than
one to
three years
   More than
three to
five years
   More than
five years
   Total   Amortization   Effective
rate
  Nominal
value
   Nominal
rate
 
   ThUS$     ThUS$     ThUS$     ThUS$     ThUS$       %    ThUS$     %  

Guaranteed obligations

   12,076     32,192     32,213     60,438     140,944     Quarterly     5.69  113,193     5.01
   61,560     67,744     33,826     7,228     191,607     Quarterly     4.05  182,041     4.05
   46,900     125,060     106,833     124,408     418,834     Quarterly     5.18  354,360     4.61
   59,263     15 9,420     161,548     252,865     652,712     Quarterly     4.27  557,517     3.81
   16,828     44,837     44,7 49     113,352     225,381     Quarterly     3.64  188,942     3.53
   41,065     110,232     111,306     290,463     566,651     Quarterly     2.94  497,707     2.61
   16,577     44,721     45,461     143,675     255,870     Quarterly     1.14  239,882     1.01
   14,32 9     38,755     39,580     143,763     241,119     Quarterly     1.09  226,295     0.94
   6,817     18,434     18,807     69,085     115,370     Quarterly     1.41  105,863     1.26
   2,330     6,322     6,469     23,952     39,830     Quarterly     1.37  36,541     1.22

Financial leases

   21,559     43,281     39,703     9,324     121,199     Quarterly     3.94  110,576     3.73
   7,020     20,099     20,901     35,093     85,424     Quarterly     1.46  79,428     1.46
   6,140     19,663     —       —       27,612     Quarterly     1.85  26,426     1.82
   5,435     7,538     —       —       14,746     Quarterly     1.56  14,481     1.56
   12,617     33,636     33,629     14,736     98,822     Quarterly     5.22  85,948     4.68

Bank loans

   12,704     —       —       —       12,704     Semiannual     2.35  12,500     2.35
   30,291     —       —       —       30,583     Semiannual     1.91  30,000     1.91
   —       —       —       —       50,187     Quarterly     1.51  50,000     1.51
   876     45,532     —       —       46,408     Semiannual     1.82  44,848     1.81
   61,297     —       —       —       61,297     Anual     2.21  60,000     2.13

Other loans

   2,314     203,779     —       —       207,238     —       2.55  202,899     2.55
   5,884     271,307     —       —       277,191     —       1.87  269,965     1.87
   —       31,081     31,006     —       62,087     Quarterly     2.43  58,960     2.43

Derivatives

   28,940     70,303     41,382     8,62 0     159,436     —       —      154,410     —    

Non-hedging derivatives

   3,896     8,998     1,586     —       15,837     —       —      15,380     —    

Accounts payable and

                 

Other accounts payables

   25,920     —       —       —       437,828     —       —      437,828     —    
   —       —       —       —       15,408     —       —      15,408     —    
   —       —       —       —       78,245     —       —      78,245     —    

Accounts payable, non-current

   —       36,000     —       —       36,000     —       —      36,000     —    

Accounts payable Related parties

   —       —       —       —       147     —       —      147     —    
                 
   —       —       —       —       2     —       —      2     —    
   —       —       —       —       116     —       —      116     —    
                 
   —       —       —       —       102     —       —      102     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

Total

   502,638     1,438,934     768,999     1,297,002     4,686,937        4,286,010    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

Class of
Liability

 

Debtor

Tax No.

 

Debtor

 Debtor
country
 Creditor
Tax No.
 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90 days
 More
than 90
days to
one
year
 More
than one
to three
years
 More
than
three to
five
years
 More
than five
years
 Total Amortization Effective
rate
 Nominal
value
 Nominal
rate
                ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   % ThUS$ %

Loans to
exporters

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.004.000-5 

BANCO DE CHILE

 Chile US$ 292 30,291 —   —   —   30,583 Semiannual 1.91% 30,000 1.91%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.006.000-6 

BCI

 Chile US$ 50,187 —   —   —   —   50,187 Quarterly 1.51% 50,000 1.51%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$ —   12,704 —   —   —   12,704 Semiannual 2.35% 12,500 2.35%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.032.000-8 

BBVA

 Chile US$ —   61,297 —   —   —   61,297 Annual 2.21% 60,000 2.13%

Bank loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$ 1,145 2,314 203,779 —   —   207,238 —   2.55% 202,899 2.55%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.030.000-7 

ESTADO

 Chile US$ —   876 45,532 —   —   46,408 Semiannual 1.82% 44,848 1.81%

Guaranteed obligations

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$ 4,025 12,076 32,192 32,213 60,438 140,944 Quarterly 5.69% 113,193 5.01%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$ 21,249 61,560 67,744 33,826 7,228 191,607 Quarterly 4.05% 182,041 4.05%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$ 15,633 46,900 125,060 106,833 124,408 418,834 Quarterly 5.18% 354,360 4.61%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$ 19,616 59,263 159,420 161,548 252,865 652,712 Quarterly 4.27% 557,517 3.81%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

WELLS FARGO

 U.S.A. US$ 5,615 16,828 44,837 44,749 113,352 225,381 Quarterly 3.64% 188,942 3.53%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$ 13,585 41,065 110,232 111,306 290,463 566,651 Quarterly 2.94% 497,707 2.61%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$ 5,436 16,577 44,721 45,461 143,675 255,870 Quarterly 1.14% 239,882 1.01%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

JP MORGAN

 U.S.A. US$ 4,692 14,329 38,755 39,580 143,763 241,119 Quarterly 1.09% 226,295 0.94%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BTMU

 U.S.A. US$ 2,227 6,817 18,434 18,807 69,085 115,370 Quarterly 1.41% 105,863 1.26%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

APPLE BANK

 U.S.A. US$ 757 2,330 6,322 6,469 23,952 39,830 Quarterly 1.37% 36,541 1.22%

Financial leases

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$ 7,332 21,559 43,281 39,703 9,324 121,199 Quarterly 3.94% 110,576 3.73%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$ 2,311 7,020 20,099 20,901 35,093 85,424 Quarterly 1.46% 79,428 1.46%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$ 1,809 6,140 19,663 —   —   27,612 Quarterly 1.85% 26,426 1.82%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

S.CHARTERED

 U.S.A. US$ 1,773 5,435 7,538 —   —   14,746 Quarterly 1.56% 14,481 1.56%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$ 4,204 12,617 33,636 33,629 14,736 98,822 Quarterly 5.22% 85,948 4.68%

Other
loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BOEING

 U.S.A. US$ —   5,884 271,307 —   —   277,191 —   1.87% 269,965 1.87%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$ —   —   31,081 31,006 —   62,087 Quarterly 2.43% 58,960 2.43%

Hedging
derivatives

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$ 10,191 28,940 70,303 41,382 8,620 159,436 —   —   154,410 —  

Non-hedging derivatives

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$ 1,357 3,896 8,998 1,586 —   15,837 —   —   15,380 —  

Trade and other accounts payables

  

LATAM
Airlines
Group
S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Others —   

OTHERS

 —   US$ 411,908 25,920 —   —   —   437,828 —   —   437,828 —  
       CLP 15,408 —   —   —   —   15,408 —   —   15,408 —  
 —        Others 78,245 —   —   —   —   78,245 —   —   78,245 —  

Accounts payable,

 —   

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Others —   

OTHERS

 —   US$ —   —   36,000 —   —   36,000 —   —   36,000 —  

Accounts payable
to related parties currents

  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Others 96.847.880-K 

Lufthansa Lan Training S.A.

 Chile US$ 147 —   —   —   —   147 —   —   147 —  
 —    Others 96.921.070-3 

Austral Sociedad Concesionaria S.A.

 Chile CLP 2 —   —   —   —   2 —   —   2 —  
   Others 78.591.370-1 

Bethia S.A. y Filiales

 Chile CLP 116 —   —   —   —   116 —   —   116 —  
   Others Foreing 

Inversora Aeronáutica Argentina

 Argentine US$ 102 —   —   —   —   102 —   —   102 —  
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 
 Total       679,364 502,638 1,438,934 768,999 1,297,002 4,686,937   4,286,010 
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

F-1-27


LOGO

Class of liability for the analysis of liquidity risk ordered by date of maturity as of December 31, 2010

Class of Liability

Debtor
Tax No.

Debtor

Debtor
country
Creditor
Tax No.
CreditorCreditor
country
CurrencyUp to
90 days
ThUS$

Guaranteed obligations

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EINGU.S.A.US $7,425
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECALYONFranceUS $21,045
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EPEFCOU.S.A.US $19,838
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EBNPPARIBASU.S.A.US $22,831
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EWELLSFARGOU.S.A.US $5,626
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECITIBANKU.S.A.US $8,984
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ESANTANDERSpainUS $2,919

Financial leases

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EINGU.S.A.US $3,899
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECALYONFranceUS $2,249
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ECITIBANKU.S.A.US $1,692
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ES.C HARTEREDU.S.A.US $3,858

Bank loans

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ESANTANDERMADRIDSpainUS $—  

Bank loans

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.023.000-9CORPBANCAChileCLP13,479
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile76.645.030-KITAUChileCLP—  
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.006.000-6BCIChileCLP—  
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile97.030.000-7ESTADOChileCLP—  
Aires S.A.Colombia0-EHELMColombiaCOP3,944

Other loans

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-ESANTANDERMADRIDSpainUS $586
Lan Airlines S.A.Chile0-EBOEINGU.S.A.US $1,862

Derivatives

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile—  OTHERS—  US $6,018

Non-hedging derivatives

89.862.200-2Lan Airlines S.A.Chile—  OTHERS—  US $1,461

Accounts payable and other accounts payables

—  Lan Airlines S.A. and subsidiariesSeveral—  Sundry—  US $277,327
CLP28,058
�� Others169,307

Accounts payable, non-current

—  Lan Airlines S.A. and subsidiariesSeveral—  Sundry—  US $—  

Accounts payable related parties

—  Lan Airlines S.A. and subsidiariesSeveral96.847.880-kLuf thansaLa n
Technical trainings.
—  US $110
CLP74

Total

602,592

Class of Liability

  More than
90 days
to one year
   More than
one to
three years
   More than
three to
five years
   More than
five years
   Total   Amortization   Effective
rate
  Nominal
value
   Nominal
rate
 
   ThUS$     ThUS$     ThUS$     ThUS$     ThUS$       %    ThUS$     %  

Guaranteed obligations

   22,305     53,471     47,128     93,325     223,654     Quarterly     5.19  181,029     4.69
   63,352     130,785     39,186     20,916     275,284     Quarterly     4.47  256,417     4.47
   59,513     158,688     149,595     209,374     597,008     Quarterly     5.16  497,692     4.60
   68,726     184,673     186,931     385,438     848,599     Quarterly     4.49  707,306     4.00
   16,842     44,872     44,796     135,714     247,850     Quarterly     3.64  204,392     3.53
   27,039     72,767     73,806     206,771     389,367     Quarterly     3.93  326,235     3.48
   8,859     24,242     25,206     95,708     15 6,934     Quarterly     0.95  14 8,741     0.83

Financial leases

   11,685     30,440     25,695     11,675     83,394     Quarterly     4.08  77,096     3.71
   6,786     18,376     22,613     43,431     93,455     Quarterly     1.27  87,337     1.27
   5,24 9     26,758     —       —       33,699     Quarterly     1.32  32,921     1.27
   11,87 3     14,628     —       —       30,359     Quarterly     1.28  29,864     1.25

Bank loans

   26,125     12,726     —       —       38,851     Quarterly     3.64  37,500     3.55

Bank loans

   13,158     12,713     —       —       39,350     Semiannual     6.53  36,858     6.44
   21,653     10,332     —       —       31,985     Semiannual     6.67  29,967     6.60
   38,14 4     18,188     —       —       56,332     Semiannual     6.71  52,723     6.63
   47,521     22,666     —       —       70,187     Semiannual     6.65  65,704     6.59
   —       —       —       —       3,944     30 days     3.37  3,936     3.37

Other loans

   1,587     72,962     —       —       75,135     —       3.29  72,962     3.29
   1,207     106,665     —       —       109,734     —       2.04  106,209     2.04

Derivatives

   22,331     61,273     24,643     4,751     119,016     —       —      115,189     —    

Non-hedging derivatives

   4,239     9,891     5,608     —       21,199     —       —      20,703     —    

Accounts payable and other accounts payables

   26,002     —       —       —       303,329     —       —      303,329     —    
   —       —       —       —       28,058     —       —      28,058     —    
   —       —       —       —       169,307     —       —      169,307     —    

Accounts payable, non-current

   —       54,000     —       —       54,000     —       —      54,000     —    

Accounts payable related parties

   —       —       —       —       110     —       —      110     —    
   —       —       —       —       74��    —       —      74     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

Total

   504,196     1,141,116     645,207     1,207,103     4,100,214        3,645,659    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

F-1-28


LOGO

The Company has fuel, interest rate and interestexchange rate hedging strategies involving derivatives contracts with different financial institutions. The Company has margin facilities with each financial institution in order to regulate the mutual exposure produced by changes in the market valuation of the derivatives.

At the end of 2010,2011, the Company had provided US$ 78.5117.2 million in derivative margin guarantees, for cash and stand-by letters of credit. At the end of December 31, 2011,2012, the Company had provided US$ 117.2189.9 million in guarantees for Cash and cash equivalent and stand-by letters of credit. The increase was due to theat maturity and acquisition of fuel purchase contracts and interest rate contracts, risingrates, and changes in fuel prices and falling interest rates.

 

3.2.Capital risk management

The Company’s objectives, with respect to the management of capital, are (i) to safeguard it in order to continue as an on-going business, (ii) to seek a return for its shareholders, and (iii) to maintain an optimum capital structure and reduce its costs.

In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of the dividends payable to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt.

The Company monitors the adjusted leverage ratio, in line with industry practice. This index is calculated as net adjusted debt divided by the sum of adjusted equity and net adjusted debt. Net adjusted debt is total financial debt plus 8 times the operating lease payments of the last 12 months, less total cash (measured as the sum of cash and cash equivalents plus marketable securities). CapitalAdjusted capital is the amount of net equity without the impact of the market value of derivatives, plus net adjusted debt.derivatives.

Currently theThe Company’s strategy, which has not changed since 2007, has consisted of maintaining a leverage ratio of between 70% and 80% and an international credit rating of higher than BBB- (the(the minimum required for being considered investment grade). As a result of consolidation with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries, the rating agency Fitch has issued on June 22, 2012 a new long-term rating for the Company of BB + with stable perspective (which is not an investment grade rating). Prior to the merger, the Company had a rating of BBB with a negative perspective (issued pursuant to the merger announcement in August 2010).

The leverage ratios as of December 31, 2011,2012, and December 31, 2010,2011, were as follows:

 

  As of As of 
  December 31, December 31, 
  As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
   2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Total financial loans

   3,788,272    3,259,666     9,759,507    3,788,272  

Last twelve months Operating lease payment x8

   1,393,576    788,704  

Last twelve months Operating lease payment x 8

   3,390,664    1,393,576  

Less:

      

Cash and marketable securities

   (472,499  (737,093   (1,120,335  (472,499
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total net adjusted debt

   4,709,349    3,311,277     12,029,836    4,709,349  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net Equity

   1,445,324    1,296,814     5,142,083    1,445,324  

Cash flow hedging reserve

   140,556    107,050     140,730    140,556  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Adjusted equity

   1,585,880    1,403,864     5,282,813    1,585,880  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total adjusted debt and equity

   6,295,229    4,715,141     17,312,649    6,295,229  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Adjusted leverage

   74.8  70.2   69.5  74.8

F-1-29


LOGO

See information related to financial covenants in Note 36 (a).

 

3.3.Estimates of fair value

At December 31, 2011,2012, the Company maintained financial instruments that should be recorded at fair value. These include:

Investments in short-term Mutual Funds (cash equivalent),

Bank certificate of deposit - CBD

Interest rate derivative contracts,

Fuel derivative contracts,

Currency derivative contracts, and

Private investment funds.funds and

Financial letters

The Company has classified the fair value measurement using a hierarchy that reflects the level of information used in the assessment. This hierarchy consists of 3 levels (I) fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, (II) fair value calculated through valuation methods based on inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) and (III) fair value based on inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data.

The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets, such as investments acquired for trading, is based on quoted market prices at the close of the yearperiod using the current price of the buyer. The fair value of financial assets not traded in active markets (derivative contracts) is determined using valuation techniques that maximize use of available market information. Valuation techniques generally used by the Company are quoted market prices of similar instruments and / or estimating the present value of future cash flows using forward price curves of the market at yearperiod end.

The following table shows the classification of financial instruments at fair value at December 31, 20112012 depending on the level of information used in the assessment:

   Fair value
At December 31,
2011
   

Fair value measurements using values

considered as

 
      Level I       Level II       Level III   
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Assets

        

Short-term mutual funds

   156,334     156,334     —       —    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   73     —       73     —    

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   30,615     —       30,615     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   631     —       631    

Private investment funds

   60,733     60,733     —       —    

Liabilities

        

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   159,436     —       159,436     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   884     —       884     —    

Interest rate derivatives not accounted for as hedging instruments

   14,766     —       14,766     —    

F-1-30


LOGO

As of December 31,2012

 

   

Fair value

At December 31,

   Fair value measurements using values
considered as
 
   2012   Level I   Level II   Level III 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Assets

        

Cash and cash equivalents

   311,675     311,675     —       —    

Short-term mutual funds

   311,675     311,675     —       —    

Other financial assets, current

   474,176     319,145     155,031    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   6     —       6     —    

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   4,098     —       4,098     —    

Private investment funds

   317,598     317,598     —       —    

Certificate of deposit CDB

   77,316     —       77,316     —    

Financial letter

   73,611     —       73,611     —    

Domestic and foreign bonds

   748     748     —       —    

Other investments

   799     799     —       —    

Other financial assets, non current

   1,118     —       1,118    

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   1,023     —       1,023     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   95     —       95     —    

Liabilities

        

Other financial liabilities, current

   70,075     —       70,075    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   41,736     —       41,736     —    

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   10,502     —       10,502     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   13,360     —       13,360     —    

Interest rate derivatives not recognized as a hedge

   4,477     —       4,477     —    

Other financial liabilities, non current

   116,555     —       116,555     —    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   104,547     —       104,547     —    

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   4,530     —       4,530     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   1,963     —       1,963     —    

Interest rate derivatives not recognized as a hedge

   5,515     —       5,515     —    

As of December 31, 2011

       Fair value measurements using values
considered as
 
   Fair value   Level I   Level II   Level III 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$��

Assets

        

Cash and cash equivalents

   156,334     156,334     —       —    

Short-term mutual funds

   156,334     156,334     —       —    

Other financial assets, current

   92,052     60,733     31,319     —    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   73     —       73     —    

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   30,615     —       30,615     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   631     —       631     —    

Private investment funds

   60,733     60,733     —       —    

Liabilities

        

Other financial liabilities, current

   44,923     —       44,923     —    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   39,132     —       39,132     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   884     —       884     —    

Interest rate derivatives not recognized as a hedge

   4,907     —       4,907     —    

Other financial liabilities, non current

   130,163     —       130,163     —    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   120,304     —       120,304     —    

Interest rate derivatives not recognized as a hedge

   9,859     —       9,859     —    

Additionally, at December 31, 2011,2012, the Company has financial instruments which are not recorded at fair value. In order to meet the disclosure requirements of fair values, the Company has valued these instruments as shown in the table below:

 

  As of December 31, 2011   As of December 31, 2010   As of December 31, 2012   As of December 31, 2011 
  Book
value
   Fair
value
   Book
value
   Fair
value
   Book
value
   Fair
value
   Book
value
   Fair
value
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

           338,588     338,588     218,073     218,073  

Cash on hand

   4,605     4,605     3,857     3,857     6,835     6,835     4,605     4,605  

Bank balance

   17,013     17,013     24,432     24,432     147,373     147,373     17,013     17,013  

Time Deposits

   196,455     196,455     406,143     406,143  

Overnight

   119,713     119,713     46,028     46,028  

Time deposits

   64,667     64,667     150,427     150,427  

Other financial assets

           162,367     162,367     135,751     138,642  

Domestic and foreign bonds

   37,359     40,250     47,184     50,294     —       —       37,359     40,250  

Other financial assets

   120,225     120,225     80,836     80,836     162,367     162,367     98,392     98,392  

Trade and other accounts receivable non-current

   544,897     544,897     489,233     489,233  

Trade and other accounts receivable current

   1,426,330     1,426,330     531,355     531,355  

Accounts receivable from related entities

   838     838     50     50     15,187     15,187     838     838  

Other financial liabilities

   3,516,307     3,665,661     2,945,294     2,969,939  

Trade and other accounts payables,

   531,481     531,481     500,694     500,694  

Other financial assets, non current

   72,977     72,977     21,833     21,833  

Accounts receivable

   50,612     50,612     7,491     7,491  

Other financial liabilities, current

   1,977,255     2,090,726     537,334     593,585  

Trade and other accounts payables

   1,652,955     1,652,955     645,086     645,086  

Accounts payable to related entities

   367     367     184     184     274     274     367     367  

Other financial liabilities, non current

   7,582,302     7,806,643     2,978,973     3,072,076  

Accounts payable, non-current

   307,965     307,965     368,372     368,372     731,235     731,235     354,930     354,930  

The book values of accounts receivable and payable are assumed to approximate their fair values, due to their short-term nature. In the case of cash on hand, bank balances, deposits and accounts payable, non-current, fair value approximates their carrying values.

The fair value of otherOther financial liabilities is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate for similar financial instruments. In the case of otherOther financial assets, the valuation was performed according to market prices at yearperiod end.

NOTE 4 - ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS

The Company has used estimates to value and book some of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and commitments; these relate principally to:

 

(a)The evaluation of possible impairment losses for certain assets.

 

(b)The useful lives and residual values of fixed and intangible assets.

 

(c)The criteria employed in the valuation of certain assets.

 

(d)Air tickets sold that are not actually used.

 

(e)The calculation of deferred income at the year end of the period, corresponding to the valuation of kilometers or points credited to holders of the Lan Pass loyalty cardprograms which have not yet been used.

 

(f)The need for provisions and where required, the determination of their values.

 

(g)The recoverability of deferred tax assets.

These estimates are made on the basis of the best information available on the matters analyzed.

In any case, it is possible that events will require modification of the estimates in the future, in which case the effects would be accounted for prospectively.

Additionally, the management has applied judgment in determining that LATAM Airlines Group S.A. has control over TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries for accounting purposes and therefore has consolidated their financial statements. The above on the basis that LATAM issued their ordinary shares in exchange for all of the outstanding common and preferred shares of TAM (except those shareholders of TAM who did not accept exchange and which were subject of the squeeze-out described in Note 18.2), entitling LATAM to substantially all of the economic benefits that will be generated by the LATAM Group and also, consequently, exposing it to substantially all the risks incidental to the operations of TAM. This exchange aligns the economic interests of LATAM and all of its shareholders, including the TAM controlling shareholders, ensuring that the shareholders and directors of TAM will have no incentive to exercise their rights in a manner that is beneficial to TAM but detrimental to LATAM. Further, all significant actions required for the operation of the airlines require the affirmative vote of both LATAM and the TAM controlling shareholders.

F-1-31


LOGOIn addition, LATAM is in process of integrating operations with TAM, and both entities will be operated as a single company. Within this, most critical airline activities will be managed in Brazil under the TAM CEO and globally by the LATAM CEO, who will be in charge of the overall operation of the LATAM Group and who will report to the LATAM board. Further, the LATAM CEO will evaluate performance of the LATAM Group executives and, together with the LATAM board, determine compensation. Although there are restrictions on voting interests that currently may be held by foreign investors under Brazilian law, LATAM believes that the economic substance of these arrangements satisfies the requirements established by the applicable accounting standards and that consolidation by LATAM of TAM’s operations is appropriate.

NOTE 5 – SEGMENTAL-SEGMENTAL INFORMATION

The Company reports information by segments as established in IFRS 8 “Operating segments”. This standard sets rules for the reporting of information by segments in the financial statements, plus reporting about products and services, geographical areas and principal customers.

An operating segment is defined as a component of an entity on which financial information is held separately and which is evaluated regularly by the senior management in making decisions with respect to the assignment of resources and evaluation of results.

The Company has determined that it has only onetwo operating segment:segments: the air transportation.transportation and the customer loyalty program (“Multiplus”).

(a) For the periods ended

 

  Air transport segment   

Air transport

At December 31,

 

Multiplus

At December 31,

   

Eliminations

At December 31,

   

Consolidated

At December 31,

 
  For the year ended December 31,   2012 2011 2010 2012 2011   2012 2011   2012 2011 2010 
  2011 2010 2009   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Income from ordinary activities and other operating income

   5,718,244    4,523,328    3,655,513  

Income from ordinary activities

   9,733,950    5,585,440    4,390,502    400,860    —       (412,621  —       9,722,189    5,585,440    4,390,502  

Other operating income

   211,955    132,804    132,826    8,201    —       —      —       220,156    132,804    132,826  

Interest income

   14,453    14,946    18,183     51,004    14,453    14,946    26,485    —       —      —       77,489    14,453    14,946  

Interest expense

   (139,077  (155,279  (153,109   (294,447  (139,077  (155,279  (151  —       —      —       (294,598  (139,077  (155,279
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net interest expense

   (124,624  (140,333  (134,926   (243,443  (124,624  (140,333  26,334    —       —      —       (217,109  (124,624  (140,333
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

   (396,475  (336,491  (304,062   (784,038  (396,475  (336,491  (849  —       —      —       (784,887  (396,475  (336,491
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Segment profit

   320,197    419,702    231,126     (51,190  320,197    419,702    62,146    —       —      —       10,956    320,197    419,702  

Earnings on investments

   458    132    315  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Participation of the entity in the income of associates

   972    458    132    —      —       —      —       972    458    132  

Expenses for income tax

   (61,789  (81,107  (44,487   (101,019  (61,789  (81,107  (1,193  —       —      —       (102,212  (61,789  (81,107

Assets of segment

   7,648,659    6,785,897    5,771,972     19,917,959    7,648,659    —      637,195    —       (22,082  —       20,533,072    7,648,659    6,785,897  

Investments in associates

   991    593    1,236     1,619    991    —      2,138    —       —      —       3,757    991    593  

Purchase of non-monetary assets

   1,394,640    1,048,394    555,279  

Purchase of non-monetary assets of segment

   —      1,394,640    —      —      —       —      —       2,448,530    1,394,640    1,048,394  

The Company’s revenues by geographic area are as follows:

 

  For the year ended December 31,   

For the periods ended

At December 31

 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Peru

   558,227     554,072     458,384     620,263     557,549     553,501  

Argentina

   616,270     496,546     404,795     890,167     616,625     496,962  

USA

   1,140,006     858,630     680,179  

U.S.A.

   1,268,573     1,135,904     857,624  

Europe

   523,749     447,702     343,819     738,803     523,749     447,702  

Colombia

   369,102     85,309     76,574     366,664     367,642     103,355  

Brazil

   3,334,249     258,300     198,903  

Ecuador

   266,271     228,871     184,357  

Chile

   1,423,956     1,239,350     1,004,291     1,525,009     1,312,376     1,117,206  

Others (*)

   1,086,934     841,719     687,471  

Asia Pacific and rest of Latin America

   712,190     584,424     430,892  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total (**)

   5,718,244     4,523,328     3,655,513  

Income from ordinary activities

   9,722,189     5,585,440     4,390,502  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Other operating income

   220,156     132,804     132,826  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

The Company allocates revenues by geographic area based on the point of sale of the passenger ticket or cargo. Assets are composed primarily of aircraft and aeronautical equipment, which are used throughout the different countries, so it is not possible to assign a geographic area.

(*)Includes the rest of Latin America and Asia Pacific.

(**)Includes operating revenues and other operating income.

The Company has no customers that individually represent more than 10% of sales.

F-1-32


LOGOFor the period ended at December 31, 2012 the income incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 6 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash

    

Cash on hand

   4,605     3,857     6,835     4,605  

Bank balances

   17,013     24,432     147,373     17,013  

Overnight

   119,713     46,028  
  

 

   

 

 

Total Cash

   273,921     67,646  
  

 

   

 

 

Cash equivalents

    

Time deposits

   196,455     406,143     64,667     150,427  

Mutual funds

   156,334     196,620     311,675     156,334  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   374,407     631,052  

Total cash equivalents

   376,342     306,761  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

   650,263     374,407  
  

 

   

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 Cash and cash equivalents, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

Cash and cash equivalents are denominated in the following currencies at December 31, 2011,2012, and December 31, 2010:2011:

 

Currency

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Argentine peso (*)

   70,381     20,020  

Brazilian real

   149,723     6,616  

Chilean peso (*)

   40,212     148,274  

Colombian peso

   28,758     7,668  

Euro

   15,502     5,688  

US Dollar

   158,313     194,212     230,776     158,313  

Chilean peso (*)

   148,274     368,360  

Euro

   5,688     7,844  

Argentine peso

   20,020     11,230  

Brazilian real

   6,616     4,759  

Colombian peso

   7,668     10,231  

Strong bolivar (**)

   51,346     21,589  

Other currencies

   27,828     34,416     63,565     6,239  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   374,407     631,052     650,263     374,407  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(*)The Company entered intohas no currency derivative contracts (forward exchange controls) for ThUS$(forward) at December 31, 2012 (ThUS$ 110,339 at December 31, 2011 (ThUS$ 169,357 at December 31, 2010)2011), for conversion into dollars of investments in Chilean pesos,pesos. For currency derivative contracts, (cross currency swaps) for ThUS$ 0 at December 31, 2011 (ThUS$ 30,258 at December 31, 2010), for conversion into dollars for the investments in Argentine pesos, the Company has no outstanding contracts at December 31, 2012.

(**)In Venezuela, effective 2003, the authorities decreed that all remittances abroad should be approved by the Currency Management Commission (“CADIVI”). Despite having free availability of investmentbolivars in Unidades de Fomento (“UF”)Venezuela, the Company has certain restrictions for freely remitting these funds outside Venezuela. At December 31, 2012, the restricted amount, in US dollars is ThUS$ 51,346 (ThUS$ 23,914 at December 31, 2011).

In Venezuela, effective 2003, the authorities decreed that all remittances abroad should be approved by the Currency Management Commission (CADIVI). Despite having free availability of bolivars in Venezuela, the Company has certain restrictions for freely remitting these funds outside Venezuela. At December 31, 2011 the amount subject to such restrictions in dollar terms is ThUS$ 23,914 (ThUS$ 26,738 at December 31, 2010).

The Company has no significant non-monetarynon-cash transactions that shouldmust be reported.disclosed.

Other inflows (outflows) of cash at 31 December 2012, 31 December 2011 and 31 December, 2010 are detailed as follow.

 

F-1-33
   For the periods ended December 31, 
   2012  2011  2010 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Fuel hedge

   14,237    51,611    1,798  

Hedging margin guarantees

   12,057    (40,519  (9,949

Guarantees

   (13,974  (1,609  (27,490

Commodities fuel derivatives

   (20,479  (7,987  (5,766

Bank commissions, taxes paid and other

   (42,274  (8,995  (1,654
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Other inflows (outflows) Operation flow

   (50,433  (7,499  (43,061
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Opening balance Cash and cash equivalents acquired companies

   263,986    1,122    808  

Amount paid by Squeeze Out TAM S.A. (*)

   (167,589  —      —    

Certificate of bank deposits

   (69,254  —      —    

Other

   —      (577  4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Other inflows (outflows) Investment flow

   27,143    545    812  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Aircraft Financing advances

   (242,804  163,754    71,685  

Credit card loan manager

   76,280    —      —    

Settlement of derivative contracts

   (50,827  (9,219  8,530  

Other

   (13,728  (7,686  (34
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Other inflows (outflows) Financing flow

   (231,079  146,849    80,181  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 


LOGO

NOTE 7 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

7.1. Financial instruments by category

7.1.Financial instruments by category

As of December 31, 2012

Assets

  Loans
and
receivables
   Hedge
derivatives
   Held
for
trading
   Initial designation
as fair value
through

profit and loss
   Total 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

   338,588     —       —       311,675     650,263  

Other financial assets, current (*)

   162,367     4,104     74,359     395,713     636,543  

Trade and others accounts receivable, current

   1,426,330     —       —       —       1,426,330  

Accounts receivable from related entities, current

   15,187     —       —       —       15,187  

Other financial assets,non current (*)

   72,470     1,118     507     —       74,095  

Accounts receivable, non current

   50,612     —       —       —       50,612  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,065,554     5,222     74,866     707,388     2,853,030  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

      Other
financial
liabilities
   Hedge
derivatives
   Held
for
trading
   Total 
       ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other liabilities, current

     1,977,255     65,598     4,477     2,047,330  

Trade and others accounts payable, current

     1,652,955     —       —       1,652,955  

Accounts payable torelated entities, current

     274     —       —       274  

Other financial liabilities, non current

     7,582,302     111,040     5,515     7,698,857  

Accounts payable, non current

     731,235     —       —       731,235  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     11,944,021     176,638     9,992     12,130,651  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)The value presented at fair value through profit and loss on initial recognition, corresponds to private investment funds; and loans and receivables corresponds to guarantees given.

At December 31, 2011

 

Assets

  Held to
maturity
   Loans and
accounts
receivable
   Hedging
derivatives
   Held to
trading
   Designated as at
fair value
through profit
and loss on initial
recognition
   Total 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

   —       218,073     —       156,334     —       374,407  

Other financial assets (*)

   37,867     119,717     31,319     —       60,733     249,636  

Trade and other current accounts receivable

   —       537,406     —       —       —       537,406  

Current accounts receivable from related parties

   —       838     —       —       —       838  

Non-current accounts receivable

   —       7,491     —       —       —       7,491  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   37,867     883,525     31,319     156,334     60,733     1,169,778  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

  Other
Financial
liabilities
   Hedging
derivatives
   Held to
trading
   Total 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other financial liabilities

   3,516,307     160,320     14,766     3,691,393  

Trade and other accounts payables

   531,481     —       —       531,481  

Current accounts payable to related parties

   367     —       —       367  

Non-current accounts payable

   307,965     —       —       307,965  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   4,356,120     160,320     14,766     4,531,206  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets

  Held
for
maturity
   Loans
and
receivables
   Hedge
derivates
   Held
for
trading
   Initial designation
as fair value
through

profit and loss
   Total 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

   —       218,073     —       156,334     —       374,407  

Other financial assets, current (*)

   37,359     98,392     31,319     —       60,733     227,803  

Trade and others accounts receivable, current

   —       531,355     —       —       —       531,355  

Accounts receivable torelated entities, current

   —       838     —       —       —       838  

Other financial assets,non current (*)

   508     21,325     —       —       —       21,833  

Accounts receivable, non current

   —       7,491     —       —       —       7,491  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   37,867     877,474     31,319     156,334     60,733     1,163,727  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

          Other
financial
liabilities
   Hedge
derivatives
   Held
for
trading
   Total 
           ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other liabilities, current

       537,334     40,016     4,907     582,257  

Trade and other accounts payable, current

       645,086     —       —       645,086  

Accounts payable to related entities, current

       367     —       —       367  

Other financial liabilities, non current

       2,978,973     120,304     9,859     3,109,136  

Accounts payable, non current

       354,930     —       —       354,930  
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

       4,516,690     160,320     14,766     4,691,776  
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(*)The value presented in held to maturity corresponds mainly to domestic and foreign bonds;bonds and other investments; in designated as at fair value through profit and loss on initial recognition corresponds to private investment funds; and loans and accounts receivablereceivables corresponds to guarantees given.

As of December 31, 2010

7.2. Financial instruments by currency

a) Assets

 

Assets

  Held to
maturity
   Loans and
accounts
receivable
   Hedging
derivatives
   Held to
trading
   Designated as
at fair value
through profit
and loss on initial
recognition
   Total 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

   —       434,432     —       196,620     —       631,052  

Other financial assets (*)

   47,691     80,329     80,161     —       58,857     267,038  

Trade and other current accounts receivable

   —       481,350     —       —       —       481,350  

Current accounts receivable from related parties

   —       50     —       —       —       50  

Non-current accounts receivable

   —       7,883     —       —       —       7,883  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   47,691     1,004,044     80,161     196,620     58,857     1,387,373  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

   650,263     374,407  

Argentine peso

   70,381     20,020  

Brazilian real

   149,723     6,616  

Chilean peso

   40,212     148,274  

Colombian peso

   28,758     7,668  

Euro

   15,502     5,688  

US Dollar

   230,776     158,313  

Strong bolívar

   51,346     21,589  

Other currencies

   63,565     6,239  

Other financial assets (current and non current)

   710,638     249,636  

Argentine peso

   131     125  

Brazilian real

   545,426     3,066  

Chilean peso

   648     588  

Colombian peso

   2,828     4,175  

Euro

   7,825     291  

US Dollar

   142,254     241,008  

Strong bolívar

   601     5  

Other currencies

   10,925     378  

Trade and other accounts receivable, current

   1,426,330     531,355  

Argentine peso

   33,049     24,879  

Brazilian real

   561,746     35,467  

Chilean peso

   132,869     63,818  

Colombian peso

   8,086     34,583  

Euro

   67,287     8,266  

US Dollar

   530,380     348,921  

Strong bolívar

   2,759     1,247  

Other currencies

   90,154     14,174  

Accounts receivable, non-current

   50,612     7,491  

Brazilian real

   6,677     —    

Chilean peso

   9,564     7,422  

US Dollar

   34,123     9  

Other currencies

   248     60  

Accounts receivable from related entities, current

   15,187     838  

Brazilian real

   611     —    

Chilean peso

   14,565     809  

US Dollar

   11     29  

Total assets

   2,853,030     1,163,727  

Argentine peso

   103,561     45,024  

Brazilian real

   1,264,183     45,149  

Chilean peso

   197,858     220,911  

Colombian peso

   39,672     46,426  

Euro

   90,614     14,245  

US Dollar

   937,544     748,280  

Strong bolívar

   54,706     22,841  

Other currencies

   164,892     20,851  

b) Liabilities

F-1-34


LOGO

Liabilities

  Other
Financial
liabilities
   Hedging
derivatives
   Held to
trading
   Total 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other financial liabilities

   2,945,294     139,930     19,748     3,104,972  

Trade and other accounts payables

   500,694     —       —       500,694  

Current accounts payable to related parties

   184     —       —       184  

Non-current accounts payable

   368,372     —       —       368,372  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   3,814,544     139,930     19,748     3,974,222  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)The value presented in held to maturity corresponds mainly to domestic and foreign bonds; and designated as at fair value through profit and loss on initial recognition corresponds to private investment funds; and loans and accounts receivable corresponds to guarantees given.

F-1-35


LOGO

7.2.Financial instruments by currency

a) Assets

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

   374,407     631,052  

US Dollar

   158,313     194,212  

Chilean Peso

   148,274     368,360  

Euro

   5,688     7,844  

Argentine Peso

   20,020     11,230  

Brazilian Real

   6,616     4,759  

Colombian Peso

   7,668     10,231  

Others

   27,828     34,416  

Other financial Assets

   249,636     267,038  

US Dollar

   241,008     255,808  

Brazilian Real

   3,066     6,731  

Colombian Peso

   4,175     2,917  

Others

   1,387     1,582  

Trade and other current accounts receivable

   537,406     481,350  

US Dollar

   354,972     361,570  

Chilean Peso

   63,818     28,606  

Euro

   8,266     8,429  

Argentine Peso

   24,879     6,702  

Brazilian Real

   35,467     31,329  

Australian Dollar

   5,567     5,588  

Colombian Peso

   34,583     27,156  

Others

   9,854     11,970  

Non-current accounts receivable

   7,491     7,883  

US Dollar

   9     9  

Chilean Peso

   7,422     7,864  

Others

   60     10  

Current accounts receivable from related parties

   838     50  

US Dollar

   29     29  

Chilean Peso

   809     21  

Total financial assets

   1,169,778     1,387,373  

US Dollar

   754,331     811,628  

Chilean Peso

   220,323     404,851  

Euro

   13,954     16,273  

Argentine Peso

   44,899     17,932  

Brazilian Real

   45,149     42,819  

Australian Dollar

   5,567     5,588  

Colombian Peso

   46,426     40,304  

Others

   39,129     47,978  

b)Liabilities

Liabilities information is detailed in the table within Note 3 section (c) Liquidity risk.

F-1-36


LOGOFinancial risk management.

NOTE 8 - TRADE, OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND NON-CURRENT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
 As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Trade accounts receivable

   474,852    435,576     1,369,465    474,852  

Other accounts receivable

   90,570    75,734     182,980    84,519  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total trade and other accounts receivable

   565,422    511,310     1,552,445    559,371  

Less: Allowance for impairment loss

   (20,525  (22,077   (75,503  (20,525
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total net trade and accounts receivable

   544,897    489,233     1,476,942    538,846  

Less: non-current portion – accounts receivable

   (7,491  (7,883   (50,612  (7,491
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Trade and other accounts receivable, current

   537,406    481,350     1,426,330    531,355  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Trade, other accounts receivables and non-current accounts receivables, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

The fair value of trade and other accounts receivable does not differ significantly from the book value.

There are overdue accounts receivable which are not impaired. MaturityThe maturity of these accounts at the end of each period is as follows:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Up to 3 months

   17,138     12,506  

Between 3 and 6 months

   6,256     11,114  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   23,394     23,620  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Day

   1,226,120     428,706  

Expired from 1 to 90 days

   33,160     24,082  

Expired from 91 to 180 days

   10,705     564  

More than 180 days overdue (*)

   23,977     975  

Judicial, pre-judicial collection and protested documents

   29,556     10,549  

Accounts receivable that were evaluated in their ability to recover

   45,947     9,976  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,369,465     474,852  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Value of this segment corresponds primarily to Accounts receivable that were evaluated in their ability to recover, therefore not requiring a provision.

The receivable past due but not impaired at the end of each period is as follows:

    As of December 31, 2012   As of December 31, 2011 
   Gross
exposure
   Gross
Impaired
exposure
  Exposure net
of risk
concentrations
   Gross
exposure
   Gross
Impaired
exposure
  Exposure net
of risk
concentrations
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Trade accounts receivable

   1,369,465     (75,503  1,293,962     474,852     (20,525  454,327  

Other accounts receivable

   182,980     —      182,980     84,519     —      84,519  

The amounts of individually impaired tradeTrade and other accounts receivable are as follows:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Judicial and pre-judicial collection

   9,626     10,586  

Debtors under pre-judicial collection process

   4,306     5,259  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   13,932     15,845  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Judicial, pre-judicial collection and protested documents

   29,556     10,549  

Debtors under pre-judicial collection process and portfolio sensitization

   45,947     9,976  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   75,503     20,525  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Currency balances that make up the tradeTrade receivables, non-current accounts receivable and accounts receivables at December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
Currency  ThUS$   ThUS$   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 

US Dollar

   354,981     361,579  

Chilean Peso

   71,240     36,470  

Euro

   8,266     8,429  
  ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Argentine Peso

   24,879     6,702     33,049     24,879  

Brazilian Real

   35,467     31,329     568,423     35,467  

Australian Dollar

   5,567     5,588  

Chilean Peso

   142,433     71,240  

Colombian peso

   34,583     27,156     8,086     34,583  

Other

   9,914     11,980  

Euro

   67,287     8,266  

US Dollar

   564,503     348,930  

Strong bolivar

   2,759     1,247  

Other currency

   90,402     14,234  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   544,897     489,233     1,476,942     538,846  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

F-1-37


LOGO

The Company records allowances when there is evidence of impairment of trade receivables. The criteria used to determine that there is objective evidence of impairment losses are the maturity of the portfolio, specific acts of damage (default) and specific market signals.

 

Maturity

  Impairment 

Judicial and pre-judicial collection Assetsassets

   100

Over 1 year

   100

Between 6 and 12 months

   50

Specifically for TAM S.A. the situation is different, the estimate of the provision is by document, those due in more than 180 days are provisioned 100%, except for those that are considered real active guarantees.

The movement in the allowance for impairment loss of tradeTrade accounts and otherOther accounts receivables between January 01, 20101, 2011 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

   ThUS$

As of January 1, 2010

(23,817

Write-offs

5,039

(Increase) decrease in allowance

(3,299

Balance as of December 31, 2010

(22,077

 

As of January 1, 2011

   (22,077

Write-offs

   4,060  

(Increase) decrease in allowance

   (2,508
  

 

 

 

BalanceClosing balance as of December 31, 2011

   (20,525

As of January 1, 2012

(20,525

Write-offs

3,312

(Increase) decrease in allowance

(2,857

Addition for business combination

(54,511

Conversion difference affiliates

(922

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

(75,503
  

 

 

 

Once pre-judicial and judicial collection efforts are exhausted, the assets are written off against the allowance. The Company only uses the allowance method rather than direct write-off, to ensure control.

Historic and current re-negotiations are not relevant and the policy is to analyze case by case in order to classify them according to the existence of risk, determining whether it is appropriate to re-classify accounts to pre-judicial recovery. If such re-classification is justified, an allowance is made for the account, whether overdue or falling due.

The maximum credit-risk exposure at the date of presentation of the information is the fair value of each one of the categories of accounts receivable indicated above.

 

  As of December 31, 2011   As of December 31, 2010   As of December 31, 2012   As of December 31, 2011 
  Gross
exposure
   Gross
Impaired
exposure
 Exposure net
of risk
concentrations
   Gross
exposure
   Gross
Impaired
exposure
 Exposure net
of risk
concentrations
   Gross
exposure
   Gross
Impaired
exposure
 Exposure net
of risk
concentrations
   Gross
exposure
   Gross
Impaired
exposure
 Exposure net
of risk
concentrations
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Trade accounts receivable

   474,852     (20,525  454,327     435,576     (22,077  413,499     1,369,465     (75,503  1,293,962     474,852     (20,525  454,327  

Other accounts receivable

   90,570     —      90,570     75,734     —      75,734     182,980     —      182,980     84,519     —      84,519  

There are no relevant guarantees covering credit risk and these are valued when they are settled; no materially significant direct guarantees exist. Existing guarantees, if appropriate, are made through IATA.

F-1-38


LOGO

NOTE 9 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM/PAYABLE TO RELATED ENTITIES

The accountsAccounts receivable from and payable to related entities as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, respectively, are as follows:

 

(a)Accounts Receivable

 

Tax No.

 

Related party

 Relationship Country
of
origin
 As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
 Currency 

Transaction
deadlines

 Nature of
transaction
 

T ax No.

  

Related party

  

Relationship

  

Country of
origin

  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
   Currency   

Transaction
deadlines

  

Nature of
transaction

   ThUS$ ThUS$              ThUS$   T hUS$           

96.810.370-9

 Inversiones Costa Verde Ltda y CPA Controlling shareholder  Chile    19    —     CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    Inversiones Costa Verde Ltda. y CPA.  Controlling shareholder  Chile   1     19     CLP    30 to 45 days  Monetary

96.778.310-2

 Concesionaria Chucumata S.A. Associate  Chile    —      4   CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary  

96.921.070-3

 Austral Sociedad Concesionaria S.A. Associate  Chile    —      2   CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary  

78.591.370-1

 Bethia S.A. y Filiales Others related parties  Chile    758    —     CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    Bethia S.A. y Filiales  Others related parties  Chile   14,534     758     CLP    30 to 45 days  Monetary

87.752.000-5

 Granja Marina Tornagaleones S.A. Others related parties  Chile    32    15   CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    Granja Marina Tornagaleones S.A.  Others related parties  Chile   30     32     CLP    30 to 45 days  Monetary

96.812.280-0

 San Alberto S.A. y Filiales Others related parties  Chile    29    29   US$ 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    San Alberto S.A. y Filiales  Others related parties  Chile   —       29     US$    30 to 45 days  Monetary

Foreign

  TAM Aviação Executiva e Taxi Aéreo S.A.  Others related parties  Brazil   14     —       BRL    30 to 45 days  Monetary

Foreign

  Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Fidelização  Others related parties  Brazil   597     —       BRL    30 to 45 days  Monetary

Foreign

  Inversora Aeronautica Argentina  Others related parties  Argentina   11     —       US$    30 to 45 days  Monetary
    

 

  

 

            

 

   

 

       
 Total current assets    838    50       Total current assets       15,187     838        
    

 

  

 

            

 

   

 

       

On December 28, 2012, Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica S.A. as seller and Sotraser S.A. (Subsidiary of Bethia S.A.) as purchaser, entered into an agreement to purchase the land called “Lot No. 12 of parcellation project Lo Echevers”. The value of the sale amounts to ThUS$ 14,217.

(b)Accounts payable

 

Tax No.

 

Related party

 Relationship Country
of
origin
 As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
 Currency 

Transaction
deadlines

 Nature of
transaction
   

Related party

  

Relationship

  

Country

of

origin

  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
   

Currency

  

Transaction
deadlines

  

Nature of
transaction

 ThUS$ ThUS$              ThUS$   ThUS$          

96.847.880-K

 Lufthansa Lan Technical Training S.A. Associate Chile  —      74   CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    Lufthansa Lan Technical Training S.A.  Associate  Chile   237     147    US$  30 to 45 days  Monetary

96.847.880-K

 Lufthansa Lan Technical Training S.A. Associate Chile  147    110   US$ 30 to 45 Days  Monetary  

96.921.070-3

 Austral Sociedad Concesionaria S.A. Associate Chile  2    —     CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    Austral Sociedad Concesionaria S.A.  Associate  Chile   —       2    CLP  30 to 45 days  Monetary

78.591.370-1

 Bethia S.A. y Filiales Other related parties Chile  116    —     CLP 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    Bethia S.A. y Filiales  Other related parties  Chile   14     116    CLP  30 to 45 days  Monetary

Foreign

 Inversora Aeronaútica Argentina Other related parties Argentina  102    —     US$ 30 to 45 Days  Monetary    Made In Everywhere Repr. Com. Distr. Ltda.  Other related parties  Brazil   23     —      BRL  30 to 45 days  Monetary

Foreign

  Inversora Aeronaútica Argentina  Other related parties  Argentina   —       102    US$  30 to 45 days  Monetary
    

 

  

 

      Total current liabilities       274     367        
 Total current liabilities    367    184     
    

 

  

 

    

Transactions between related parties have been carried out on free-trade conditions between interested and duly-informed parties.

F-1-39


LOGO

NOTE 10 - INVENTORIES

The inventoriesInventories at December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 20102011 respectively, are detailed below:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Technical stock

   57,836     40,625     150,130     57,836  

Non-technical stock

   14,951     12,568     31,153     14,951  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total production suppliers

   181,283     72,787  
   72,787     53,193    

 

   

 

 
  

 

   

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Inventories, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

The items included in this heading are spare parts and materials that will be used mainly in consumption in in-flight and maintenance services (providedprovided to the Company and third parties),parties, which are valued at average cost, net of provision for obsolescence that as of December 31, 20112012 amounts to ThUS$ 1,6851,174 (ThUS$ 3,0751,685 as of December 31, 2010)2011). The resulting amounts do not exceed the respective net realizable values.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the Company recorded ThUS$ 41,213127,989 (ThUS$ 32,91541,213 as of December 31, 2010)2011) within the income statement, mainly due to in-flight consumption and maintenance, which forms part of costCost of sales.Sales.

NOTE 11 - TAX ASSETS

The composition of Tax assets is as follows:

   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

Sales tax

   110,609     68,755  

Income tax

   100,263     24,727  

Others

   9,657     5,307  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   220,529     98,789  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

Sales tax

   73,516     42,958  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current

   73,516     42,958  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The balances at December 31, 2012 of Tax assets, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 11 –12 - OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS

The composition of otherOther financial assets is as follows:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

(a) Other financial assets

   196,484     165,712  

(b) Hedging asset

   31,319     79,739  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Current

   227,803     245,451  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

(a) Other financial assets

   21,833     21,165  

(b) Hedging assets

   —       422  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current

   21,833     21,587  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

(a)    Other financial assets

   632,439     196,484  

(b)    Hedging asset

   4,104     31,319  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   636,543     227,803  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

(a)    Other financial assets

   72,977     21,833  

(b)    Hedging asset

   1,118     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current

   74,095     21,833  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-1-40


LOGOThe balance at December 31, 2012 of Other financial assets, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

a)(a)Other financial assets

Other financial assets as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, respectively, are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

Private investment Funds

   60,733     58,857  

Domestic and Foreign bonds

   37,359     47,184  

Private investment funds

   317,598     60,733  

Guarantees for margins of derivatives

   79,171     39,868     121,889     79,171  

Financial letters

   73,611     —    

Deposits in guarantee (aircraft)

   11,657     12,030     33,012     11,657  

Certificate of deposit (CBD)

   77,316     —    

Other guarantees given

   7,564     7,773     7,466     7,564  

Other investments

   799     —    

Domestic and foreign bonds

   748     37,359  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current

   196,484     165,712     632,439     196,484  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current

        

Deposits in guarantee (aircraft)

   15,498     15,000     37,247     15,498  

Deposits in guarantee (loan)

   29,344     —    

Other guarantees given

   5,827     5,658     5,879     5,827  

Other investments

   508     507     507     508  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current

   21,833     21,165     72,977     21,833  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other financial assets

   218,317     186,877     705,416     218,317  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

b)Hedging assets

Hedging assets as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, are as follows:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

Interest accrued since last payment date of currency Swap

   —       3,691  

Cash-flow hedge of interest-rate risk

   73     —    

Cash-flow hedge of currency risk

   631     30,234  

Cash-flow hedge of fuel-price risk

   30,615     45,814  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   31,319     79,739  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

Cash-flow hedge of interest-rate risk

   —       422  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current

   —       422  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total hedging assets

   31,319     80,161  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   6     73  

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   —       631  

Fair value of fuel price derivatives

   4,098     30,615  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   4,104     31,319  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   95     —    

Fair value of fuel price derivatives

   1,023     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current

   1,118     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total hedging asset

   5,222     31,319  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign currency derivatives include the fair value of Forwardforward exchange and Cross Currency Swaps and forward exchangecollars contracts.

The types of derivative hedging contracts maintained by the Company at the end of each yearperiod are presented in Note 20.

F-1-41


LOGO21.

NOTE 12 –13 - OTHER NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS

The composition of otherOther non-financial assets is as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

a) Advance Payments

   25,501     17,648  

a) Advance payments

   45,829     31,552  

b) Other assets

   1,159     1,172     123,995     1,159  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current

   26,660     18,820     169,824     32,711  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-Current

        

a) Advance Payments

   11,189     8,752  

a) Advance payments

   39,707     11,189  

b) Other assets

   46,974     23,756     204,198     4,016  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current

   58,163     32,508     243,905     15,205  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Other non-financial assets, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

 

a)Advance payments

Advance payments as of December 31, 20112012 as of December 31, 20102011 are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

Aircraft insurance and other

   7,954     6,459     12,643     7,954  

Aircraft leases

   13,196     7,343     18,703     13,196  

Handling and ground handling services

   2,941     —       158     2,941  

Others

   1,410     3,846     14,325     7,461  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current

   25,501     17,648     45,829     31,552  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-Current

        

Aircraft leases

   11,189     4,984     20,732     11,189  

Handling and ground handling services

   —       2,971  

Others

   —       797     18,975     —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current

   11,189     8,752     39,707     11,189  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total advance payments

   36,690     26,400     85,536     42,741  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

F-1-42


LOGO

b)Other assets

Other assets as of December 31, 2011,2012, and December 31, 20102011 are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

Aircraft maintenance reserve

   123,299     —    

Contributions to SITA

   696     841  

Others

   1,159     1,172     —       318  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current

   1,159     1,172     123,995     1,159  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current

        

Recoverable taxes

   42,958     23,343  

Aircraft maintenance reserve

   149,084     —    

Judicial deposits

   54,336     —    

Contributions to SITA

   474     —    

Others

   4,016     413     304     4,016  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current

   46,974     23,756     204,198     4,016  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other assets

   48,133     24,928     328,193     5,175  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

NOTE 13 –14 - NON-CURRENT ASSETS (OR DISPOSAL GROUPS) CLASSIFIED AS HELD FOR SALE

Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale as of December 31, 2011,2012, and December 31, 20102011 are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Aircraft

   44,878     1,537  

Rotables

   1,184     28  

Inventories on consignment

   686     527  

Engines

   2,204     2,204     542     2,204  

Inventories on consignment

   527     748  

Aircraft

   1,537     1,537  

Scrapped aircraft

   365     970     365     365  

Rotables

   28     38  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   4,661     5,497     47,655     4,661  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

During 2011, sales were madeThe balance at December 31, 2012 of inventoriesNon-current assets or disposal groups classified as held on consignmentfor sale, incorporates the effects of the Boeing 737-200 fleet.Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

During the financial year 2010, sales2012, a transfer of an aircraft Boing 767-200, two A318-100 aircraft, the land located in Avenida Presidente Riesco N° 5537 and the land located in Avenida Circunvalación Américo Vespucio N° 1401 from the item Property, plant and equipment to Non-current assets or groups of assets for disposal classified as held for sale. Were sold during the third quarter the Boeing 767-200 and the land located in Avenida Presidente Riesco, and during the fourth quarter the land located in Avenida Circunvalación Américo Vespucio. Otherwise, during the second and third quarter of 2012 retirements were made, as a result of rotables, inventories held on consignment and threesales of engines all from theof Boeing 737-200 fleet.

Item balances are shown net of provision, which as of December 31, 20112012 amounted to ThUS$ 5,38623,413 (ThUS$ 5,21215,504 at December 31, 2010)2011).

The Company has no discontinued operations as of December 31, 2011.

F-1-43


LOGO2012.

NOTE 14 –15 - INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

The Company has investments in companies recognized as investments in subsidiaries. All the companies defined as subsidiaries have been consolidated within the financial statements of LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries. The consolidation also includes special-purpose entities and private investment funds.

The following is a summary of financial information with respect to the sum of the financial statements of subsidiary companies, special-purpose entities and private investment funds that have been consolidated:

As of December 31, 20112012

 

  Assets   Liabilities   Assets   Liabilities 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

   493,662     618,360     2,453,764     3,747,068  

Non-current

   1,498,840     917,171     7,634,339     5,329,169  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,992,502     1,535,531     10,088,103     9,076,237  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of December 31, 20102011

 

  Assets Liabilities   Assets   Liabilities 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

   442,743    565,606     493,662     618,360  

Non-current

   1,388,194    773,927     1,498,840     917,171  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,830,937    1,339,533     1,992,502     1,535,531  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 
  

For the year ended

December 31,

 
  2011 2010 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Total operating revenues

   2,619,157    1,931,998  

Total expenses

   (2,577,685  (1,849,438
  

 

  

 

 

Total net income

   41,472    82,560  
  

 

  

 

 

   For the periods ended
December 31
 
   2012  2011 
   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Total operating revenues

   6,494,944    2,619,157  

Total expenses

   (6,586,805  (2,577,685
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net income

   (91,861  41,472  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The summarized financial information at December 31, 2012 incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

Significant subsidiaries detailed as of December 31, 2012

Name of significant subsidiary

Country
of
incorporation
Functional
currency
%
Ownership
Nature and scope of
significant restrictions

on transferring funds
to controller

Lan Perú S.A.

PeruUS$69.97858Without significant restrictions

Lan Cargo S.A.

ChileUS$99.89803Without significant restrictions

Lan Argentina S.A.

ArgentinaARS94.99055Without significant restrictions

Transporte Aéreo S.A.

ChileUS$99.89804Without significant restrictions

Aerolane Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A.

EcuadorUS$71.94990Without significant restrictions

Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

ColombiaCOP98.21089Without significant restrictions

TAM S.A.

BrazilBRL99.99938Without significant restrictions

Summary financial information of significant subsidiaries

    Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2012   Results for the period
ended December 31, 2012
 

Name of significant subsidiary

  Total
Assets
   Current
Assets
   Non-current
Assets
   Total
Liabilities
   Current
Liabilities
   Non-current
Liabilities
   Revenue   Net
Income
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Lan Perú S.A.

   159,361     133,448     25,913     150,319     149,263     1,056     1,047,106     2,513  

Lan Cargo S.A.

   727,091     172,856     554,235     371,663     169,501     202,162     292,066     (50,693

Lan Argentina S.A.

   165,961     144,463     21,498     141,454     139,653     1,801     538,328     9,152  

Transporte Aéreo S.A.

   357,725     249,174     108,551     114,302     26,731     87,571     373,157     11,144  

Aerolane Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A.

   74,204     40,531     33,673     71,284     68,068     3,216     305,177     (14,077

Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

   165,032     58,457     106,575     58,398     46,434     11,964     283,870     (75,522

TAM S.A. (*)

   8,292,729     2,026,549     6,266,180     7,457,501     3,039,500     4,418,001     3,645,409     (45,163

(*)Corresponds to consolidated information of TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

Significant subsidiaries detailed as of December 31, 2011

 

Name of significant subsidiary

  Country
of
incorporation
  Functional
currency
  %
Ownership
   Nature and scope of
significant restrictions

on transferring funds
fundstoto controller

Lan Perú S.A.

  PerúPeru  US$   69.97858    Without significant restrictions

Lan Cargo S.A.

  Chile  US$   99.89803    Without significant restrictions

Lan Argentina S.A.

  Argentina  ARS   94.99055    Without significant restrictions

Transporte Aéreo S.A.

  Chile  US$   99.89804    Without significant restrictions

Aerolane Líneas Aéreas NacionalesdelNacionales del Ecuador S.A.

  Ecuador  US$   71.94990    Without significant restrictions

Aerovías de Integración Regional,
AIRES S.A.

  Colombia  COP   98.21089    Without significant restrictions

F-1-44


LOGO

Summary financial information of significant subsidiaries

  Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2011  Results for the year
ended December 31, 2011
 

Name of significant subsidiary

 Total
Assets
  Current
Assets
  Non-current
Assets
  Total
Liabilities
  Current
Liabilities
  Non-current
Liabilities
    Revenue    Net
  Income  
 
  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Lan Perú S.A.

  139,888    124,485    15,403    128,979    128,025    954    916,861    920  

Lan Cargo S.A.

  765,829    188,937    576,892    343,799    122,450    221,349    258,298    57,140  

Lan Argentina S.A.

  136,579    108,561    28,018    114,037    112,555    1,482    438,137    (1,972

Transporte Aéreo S.A.

  348,943    237,627    111,316    116,663    26,332    90,331    370,697    26,146  

Aerolane Líneas Aéreas Nacionalesdel Ecuador S.A.

  71,598    42,369    29,229    61,102    58,726    2,376    278,039    2,303  

Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

  134,983    76,936    58,047    80,271    70,112    10,159    282,493    (25,860

Significant subsidiaries detailed as of December 31, 2010

Name of significant subsidiary

Country
of
incorporation
Functional
currency
%
Ownership
Nature and scope of
significant restrictions on transferring
funds to controller

Lan Perú S.A.

PerúUS$69.97858Without significant restrictions

Lan Cargo S.A.

ChileUS$99.89803Without significant restrictions

Lan Argentina S.A.

ArgentinaARS94.99055Without significant restrictions

Transporte Aéreo S.A.

ChileUS$99.89804Without significant restrictions

Aerolane Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A.

EcuadorUS$71.94990Without significant restrictions

Summary financial information of significant subsidiaries

 

 Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2010 Results for the year
ended  December 31, 2010
   Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2011   Results for the year
ended December 31, 2011
 

Name of significant subsidiary

 Total
Assets
 Current
Assets
 Non-current
Assets
 Total
Liabilities
 Current
Liabilities
 Non-current
Liabilities
   Revenue   Net
  Income  
   Total
Assets
   Current
Assets
   Non-current
Assets
   Total
Liabilities
   Current
Liabilities
   Non-current
Liabilities
   Revenue   Net
Income
 
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Lan Perú S.A.

  124,761    113,579    11,182    114,771    113,750    1,021    759,704    1,524     139,888     124,485     15,403     128,979     128,025     954     916,861     920  

Lan Cargo S.A.

  737,550    183,877    553,673    340,082    103,018    237,064    209,512    59,285     765,829     188,937     576,892     343,799     122,450     221,349     258,298     57,140  

Lan Argentina S.A.

  113,168    84,751    28,417    88,286    87,420    866    381,168    2,984     136,579     108,561     28,018     114,037     112,555     1,482     438,137     (1,972

Transporte Aéreo S.A.

  329,190    215,575    113,615    123,056    28,777    94,279    296,543    31,227     348,943     237,627     111,316     116,663     26,332     90,331     370,697     26,146  

Aerolane Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A.

  48,416    24,561    23,855    51,723    38,299    13,424    235,877    1,011     71,598     42,369     29,229     61,102     58,726     2,376     278,039     2,303  

Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

   134,983     76,936     58,047     80,271     70,112     10,159     282,493     (25,860

F-1-45


LOGO

NOTE 15 –16 - EQUITY ACCOUNTED INVESTMENTS

The composition of investments accounted for using the equity method is as follows:

   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

(a)    Related companies

   1,619     991  

(b)    Joint Ventures

   2,138     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

   3,757     991  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Equity accounted investments, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

(a)Related Companies

The following summarized financial information is the sum of the financial statements of the investees, corresponding to the statements of financial position as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, and the statements of income for the year endedperiods ending as of December 31, 2011,2012 and December 31, 2010:2011.

As of December 31, 2012

   Assets   Liabilities 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

   3,193     1,421  

Non-current

   419     109  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   3,612     1,530  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

   Assets   Liabilities 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

   2,649     721  

Non-current

   269     115  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,918     836  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010

   

For the periods ended

December 31

 
   2012  2011 
   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Total operating revenues

   3,704    2,896  

Total expenses

   (2,759  (1,902
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sum of net income

   945    994  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Assets   Liabilities 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

   1,865     301  

Non-current

   382     562  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,247     863  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

For the year ended

December 31,

 
   2011  2010 
   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Total operating revenues

   2,896    2,408  

Total expenses

   (1,902  (2,162
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sum of net income

   994    246  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

As an investment in associates, the Company has shown its holdings in the following companies: Austral Sociedad Concesionaria S.A., and Lufthansa Lan Technical Training S.A. and Concesionaria Chucumata S.A. The Company made no investments in associates during the year ended December 31, 2011.2012.

 

        Percentage of ownership  Cost of investment 

Company

 Country of
incorporation
  Functional
currency
  As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
  As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
 
        %  %  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Austral Sociedad Concesionaria S.A.

  Chile    CLP    20.00    20.00    661    661  

Lufthansa Lan Technical Training S.A.

  Chile    CLP    50.00    50.00    702    702  

Concesionaria Chucumata S.A. (*)

  Chile    CLP    —      16.70    —      119  

(*)In the extraordinary session of the shareholders on September 22, 2011, the shareholders approved the dissolution of the company Concesionaria Chucumata S.A.
         Percentage of ownership   Cost of investment 

Company

  Country of
incorporation
  Functional
currency
  As of
December 31,

2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,

2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
         %   %   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Austral Sociedad Concesionaria S.A.

  Chile  CLP   20.00     20.00     661     661  

Lufthansa Lan Technical Training S.A.

  Chile  CLP   50.00     50.00     702     702  

These companies do not have significant restrictions on the ability to transfer funds.

F-1-46


LOGO

The movement of investments in associates between January 1, 20102011 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

   ThUS$

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

1,236

Equity accounted earnings

132

Other reductions, investments in associated entities

(665

Dividends received

(110

Total changes in investments in associated entities

(643

Balance as of December 31, 2010

593

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   593  
  

 

 

 

Equity accounted earningsParticipation in profits

   502

Dividends received

(79)  

Other reductions, investments in associated entities

   (25

Dividends received

(79
  

 

 

 

Total changes in investments in associated entities

   398  
  

 

 

 

BalanceClosing balance as of December 31, 2011

   991

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

991

Participation in profits

295

Other increases, investments in associated entities

685

Dividends received

(352

Total changes in investments in associated entities

628

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

1,619  
  

 

 

 

The Company records the gain or loss on its investments in associates on a monthly basis in the consolidated statement of income, using the equity method. The Company has no investments in associates which are not accounted for using the equity method.

(b)Joint Venture

Multiplus S.A., a subsidiary of TAM S.A. and AIMIA Newco UK LLP (“Aimia”) jointly control the Companhia Brasileira de Servicos de Fidelização S.A. (“CBSF”). The company was incorporated on April 2, 2012, whose corporate name was changed to Prismah Fidelidade S.A. (“Prismah”).

The purpose of Prismah Fidelidade S.A. is the provision of various services, the development of programs related to loyalty programs/customer relationships and sales incentive programs for companies. Their activities include but are not limited to: the customer relationship management, technical and technological consulting, and through points programs or other ways of possible changes, the conversion of loyalty program points.

The shareholding participation in Prismah Fidelidade S.A., does not allow unilateral decisions that affect investment returns. Multiplus S.A. owns 50% of company shares and participation is accounted by the equity method proportional investment, initially recognized at cost. The participation in earnings of the company are recognized in income and the participation in changes in reserves are recognized in reserves of Multiplus S.A.

Movement investment at December 31, 2012

   

Amount

of

shares

   ThUS$ 

Beginning balance at December 31, 2011

   —       —    

Capital aware - AAG Constituent (*)

   500     1  

Capital increase - AGE (**) 09/18/2012

   6,571,500     3,215  

Result of equity equivalence

   —       (1,078
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance at December 31, 2012

   6,572,000     2,138�� 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)General Assembly Act
(**)Extraordinary General Assembly

The company Prismah Fidelidade S.A. as of December 31, 2012, has the following items:

Social capital at December 31, 2012 ThUS$

6,432

Number of ordinary shares

13,144,000

Ordinary shares owned by Multiplus S.A.

6,572,000

Participation %

50

As of
December 31,
2012
ThUS$

Liquid equity

6,432

Investment value

2,137

Loss for the year

(2,156

Result of the heritage equity

(1,078

Current assets

4,356

Non-current assets

2,275

Current liabilities

2,356

Year Revenues

164

Expense in the period

(2,320

NOTE 16 –17 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILL

The details of intangible assets are as follows:

 

Classes of intangible assets (net)

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Computer software

   64,519     45,183     144,244     25,124  

Developing software

   60,040     39,395  

Airport slots

   1,561,130     —    

Trademarks

   82,373     —    

Other assets

   404     566     806     404  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   64,923     45,749     1,848,593     64,923  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Classes of intangible assets (gross)

  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Computer software

   223,586     73,486  

Developing computer software

   60,040     39,395  

Airport slots

   1,561,130     —    

Trademarks

   82,373     —    

Other assets

   1,372     808  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,928,501     113,689  
  

 

   

 

 

Classes of intangible assets (gross)

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Computer software

   112,881     83,875  

Other assets

   808     808  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   113,689     84,683  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-1-47


LOGOThe balance at December 31, 2012 of Intangible assets other than goodwill, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

The movement in software andIntangible assets other assetsthan goodwill between January 1, 20102011 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

  Computer
software
Net
 Other
assets
Net
 Total   Computer
software
Net
 Developing
software
 Airport
slots
   Trademarks   Other
assets
Net
 Total 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

   34,087    727    34,814  

Additions

   20,915    —      20,915  

Acquisitions by business combination

   154    —      154  

Withdrawals

   (779  —      (779

Amortization

   (9,194  (161  (9,355
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   45,183    566    45,749  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   45,183    566    45,749     26,074    19,109    —       —       566    45,749  

Additions

   29,190    —      29,190     8,904    20,286    —       —       —      29,190  

Withdrawals

   (184  —      (184   (184  —      —       —       —      (184

Amortization

   (9,670  (162  (9,832   (9,670  —      —       —       (162  (9,832
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   64,519    404    64,923  

Closing balance as of December 31, 2011

   25,124    39,395    —       —       404    64,923  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

   25,124    39,395    —       —       404    64,923  

Additions

   18,768    43,633    —       —       —      62,401  

Withdrawals

   (1,637  —      —       —       (2  (1,639

Acquisitions through business combination

   78,106    28,238    1,552,016     81,892     563    1,740,815  

Transfer software

   55,618    (51,392  —       —       —      4,226  

Subsidiaries conversion difference

   (757  166    9,114     481     3    9,007  

Amortization

   (30,978  —      —       —       (162  (31,140
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

   144,244    60,040    1,561,130     82,373     806    1,848,593  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

The airport slots correspond to an administrative authorization for the arrival and departure of aircraft, in a specific airport, within a period of time.

Intangible assets with defined useful lives consist primarily of licensing and computer software, for which the Company has established useful lives of between 43 and 7 years.

The Company shows its intangible assets at cost, except for acquisitions by business combination, which are at fair value; and amortization is made on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.

The amortization of each yearthe period is shown in the consolidated statement of income in administrative expenses. The accumulated amortization of computer programs as of December 31, 20112012 amounts to ThUS$ 48,36279,342 (ThUS$ 38,69248,362 as of December 31, 2010)2011). The accumulated amortization of other identifiable intangible assets as of December 31, 20112012 amounts to ThUS$ 404566 (ThUS$ 242404 as of December 31, 2010)2011).

NOTE 17 –18 - GOODWILL AND BUSINESS COMBINATION

18.1.Goodwill

The goodwill represents the excess of cost of acquisition over the fair value of the participation of the Company in the identifiable net assets of the subsidiary at the acquisition date. Goodwill at December 31, 20112012 amounted to ThUS$ 163,7772,948,462 (ThUS$ 157,994163,777 at December 31, 2010)2011)

At December 31, 2011,2012, the Company performed an impairment test based on the value in use and no impairment was identified. The testing is done at least once per year.

The value in use of those cash generating units to which goodwill has been assigned has been determined assuming that yields, occupation factors and fleet capacity are maintained at current obtainable levels. The Company projects cash flows for the initial periods based on internal budgets and extrapolatesextrapolate the final value of these periods based on a growth factor consistent with the long-term economic projections in the markets in which the units operate. The determined cash flows are discounted at a rate which takes into account the time value of money and risks related to those cash generating units which have not been taken into account in estimation of the units’ future cash flows.

F-1-48


LOGO

The movement of goodwillGoodwill from January 1, 20102011 to December 31, 2011,2012, is as follows:

   TAM S.A.   Aerovías de
Integración
Regional.
AIRES S.A.
  AEROASIS S.A.  Other
societies
  Total 
   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   —       94,224    —      63,770    157,994  

Additions by business combinations

   —       —      6,736    —      6,736  

Initial recognition modification (*)

   —       (820  —      —      (820

Increase (decrease) due to exchange rate differences

   —       25    (123  (35  (133
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2011

   —       93,429    6,613    63,735    163,777  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

   —       93,429    6,613    63,735    163,777  

Additions by business combinations

   2,118,057     —      —      —      2,118,057  

Amendment initial recognition (*)

   640,614     —      —      —      640,614  

Increase (decrease) due to exchange rate differences

   16,201     9,219    653    (59  26,014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

   2,774,872     102,648    7,266    63,676    2,948,462  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(*)The amendments relate to initial recognition of changes in the Fair value determined at the time of the Business Combination. In TAM S.A. these changes are mainly relate to: fair value of financial instruments, fair value of the fleet and recognition of labor, civil and tax contingency. The maximum time that the standard gives (IFRS 3) to make changes is one year from the date of acquisition of the combined companies.

18.2. Business Combination

(a)TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

Dated June 22, 2012 the merger was successfully completed between LAN Airlines S.A. (today LATAM Airlines Group S.A.), with Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A., two companies specially constituted for the purpose of the association between the Company and TAM S.A. which was reflected in the deed of execution of merger issued by such companies at the same time, and it was rectified by deed dated July 10, 2012. These scriptures recorded the share exchange of Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A. for LAN´s shares in one related of 0.9 of LAN´s shares for each Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A.. That exchange occurred with the delivery of the respective LAN shares to shareholders of Sister Holdco S.A. and the respective BDRs (“Brazilian Depositary Receipts”) and ADRs (“American Depositary Receipts”) from LAN to the shareholders of Holdco II S.A. abroad on June 27, 2012, that is, TAM shareholders who accepted the exchange offer.

Under IFRS 3 this operation has been registered as a Business Combination consigning to the Company as purchaser of TAM. Besides the fact that LATAM is the one who issuing the shares in the combination, this is based on the economic rights and relative vote relating of the former shareholders of LAN and TAM over the combined entity.

The share exchange offer materialized with the exchange previously referenced was 99.9% of the TAM shares that accepted that TAM would stop being a public company in Brazil, which fulfilled the condition for the cancellation of registration, requirement for the success of the exchange offer.

As a consequence of the end of that process: (i) concluded the process of Business Combination of LAN and TAM, and (ii) the renaming of LAN Airlines S.A. to LATAM Airlines Group S.A. became effective.

On July 10, 2012, in Santiago´s Notary of Eduardo Diez Morello, Sister Holdco S.A., Holdco II S.A. and the Company granted a deed of rectification Materialization Statement on Merger by Absorption writing Materialization Statement issued Merger by Absorption dated June 22, 2012 by the same parties in the same Notary which the purpose was to invalidate the inclusion of 17,550 shares of TAM accepted for exchange in Brazil for shares of LAN which corresponded to duplicate orders that were not timely identified as such. Because of this, the result of the Exchange Offer in Brazil amounted to 29,706,339 shares of TAM, instead of 29,723,889 shares of TAM. This should be reflected in the Register of Shareholders so that Banco Itaú on behalf of investors was due to discount 15,795 shares of the Company.

On July 18, 2012, the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (“CVM”), by Deed No. 330/2012 informed TAM of the cancellation of its registration as a public company which, dated July 19, 2012, TAM was informed by a Essential Matter.

On July 27, 2012, TAM made use of the Squeeze-Out granted by the Brazilian legislation, under which a compulsory could rescue all TAM shares that were not exchanged in the exchange offer or contributed by controlling shareholders of TAM. Since TAM shares received in the exchange offer, plus the shares committed by the controlling shareholders of TAM, represented 95.9% of the total outstanding shares of TAM, the aforementioned condition was met on the remaining 4.1% through the disbursement by TAM of 339 million Brazilian Real.

At December 31, 2012 the ownership structure of TAM was as follows:

Holdco I S.A.

Shares

  TEP Chile S.A. (owned by the
controlling shareholders of
TAM)
 LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Total 

Series A (voting):

  938 (80.58%) 226 (19.42%)  1,164  

Series B (economic)

  0 55,413,621 (100.00%)  55,413,621  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

  938 55,413,847  55,414,785  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TAM S.A.

Shares

  Holdco I S.A. LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Total 

ON (voting):

  55,413,784 (100%) 0  55,413,784  

PN (non-voting):

  0 94,718,931 (100%)  94,718,931  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

  55,413,784 94,718,931  150,132,715  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TAM is a leading airline in Brazil with 35 years of operation, over 30 thousand employees, a fleet of 160 aircraft, sales of 7,300 million United States dollars and a market share (2011) Domestic 41.2% in Brazil and 88.1% on international routes operated for the Brazilian airline.

This Business Combination has created the leading airline in the region in terms of coverage and fleet. Additionally, the business models of both companies are complementary creating a significant potential for development in terms of networking and connectivity to its passengers.

The combined company will offer to its passengers around 150 destinations in 22 countries and transporting cargo to 169 destinations in 27 countries. Among the benefits that passengers of both airlines LATAM and TAM will have are, the increased connectivity, improved routes and frequencies, and reduced connection times. Additionally, members of frequent flyer programs LANPASS and TAM Fidelidade may earn and redeem miles/points in the complete flight network of LATAM and TAM.

Considering the acquisition date for accounting purposes was June 22, 2012, the definition and determination of adjustments of Business Combination at December 31, 2012 is not complete, being at this date, provisional in character. The main assets and liabilities that are still subject to fair value calculations are: Intangibles, Contingencies and certain items of Property, plant and equipment. The maximum period that the standard provides for this purpose is one year.

The assets and liabilities of the statement of financial position at June 22, 2012 of TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries are as follows:

Expressed in ThUS$

  Book Value   Fair Value 

Cash and cash equivalents

   263,986     263,986  

Other financial assets

   743,586     743,586  

Other non-financial assets

   27,380     27,380  

Trade and other accounts receivable

   1,027,949     1,022,010  

Accounts receivable from related entities

   25     25  

Inventories

   70,123     69,823  

Tax assets

   174,718     151,949  

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale

   8,865     8,865  

Other financial assets

   66,493     66,493  

Other non-financial assets

   325,171     305,706  

Accounts receivable

   13,682     13,682  

Intangible assets other than goodwill

   282,690     1,740,815  

Property, plant and equipment

   4,651,274     4,233,592  

Current tax assets, non-current

   4,266     4,266  

Deferred tax assets

   253,476     181,953  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   7,913,684     8,834,131  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other financial liabilities

   1,048,847     1,054,225  

Trade and other accounts payables

   731,394     642,863  

Accounts payable to related entities

   62     62  

Other provisions

   14,236     14,236  

Tax liabilities

   63,239     65,185  

Other non-financial liabilities

   969,575     970,299  

Other financial liabilities

   3,717,019     3,748,677  

Accounts payable

   454,289     434,921  

Accounts payable to related entities

   45     45  

Other provisions

   189,101     529,168  

Deferred tax liabilities

   52,835     234,891  

Other non-financial liabilities

   94,483     94,483  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   7,335,125     7,789,055  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Assets

   578,559     1,045,076  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The airport slots (landing and take-offs) have been measured at fair value at the date of the combination and its useful lives are classified as indefinite, which shall be subject to impairment test annually.

The Goodwill recognized on the acquisition of TAM S.A and Subsidiaries reflects the excess value of the transaction that cannot be attributed to assets and liabilities. This value expresses the synergies that are expected to be achieved through the Business Combination. Therefore, in the statement of financial position of LATAM Airlines Group S.A., Goodwill of ThUS$ 2,758,672 has been recognized.

 

Goodwill determination:
ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Opening balance asPurchase price

3,782,244

Less:

1,023,572

Fair value of January 1, 2010assets and liabilities acquired

   63,793

Additions (1)

1,045,076
   94,224

Increase (decrease) due to exchange rate differencesNoncontrolling interest

   (2321,504
 

 

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010Goodwill

  157,9942,758,672  
  

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

157,994

Additions (2)

6,736

Amendment initial recognition (3)

(820

Increase (decrease) due to exchange rate differences

(133

Closing balance as of December 31, 2011

163,777
 

 

 

 

The determination of the purchase price is explained in the following table:

Number of shares
LAN Exchange
(a)
  Share price at fair value at
June 22
exchange rate
at June 22
US$
(b)
  Purchase
price

ThUS$
(a) times  (b)
  Squeeze Out
At July
exchange rate
at June 22
ThUS$
  Total
purchase price
ThUS$
 
 135,119,066    26.76973(*)   3,617,101    165,143    3,782,244  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)(*)Corresponds to the goodwill generated by the purchase of Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A. (see Note 39).
(2)Corresponds to the goodwill generated by the purchase of Aeroasis S.A. (see Note 39).
(3)Corresponds to change of initial recognition goodwill generated by the purchaseValue of the company share at June 22 $ 13,489

Exchange rate as of June 22 503.89

The capital increase originated in the merger, is determined by the social capital amount of Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A., equivalent to ThUS$ 951,409. The difference between this value and the purchase price, amounting to ThUS$ 2,665,692 is shown in Other reserves.

The costs incurred by LATAM Airline Group S.A. to make the Business Combination amounts to ThUS$.50,647, and are recorded in the Income statement when they were incurred.

In regards to non-controlling interest, this is valued at fair value of acquired assets and liabilities at December 31, 2012.

The income contribution of TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries was ThUS$ 3,645,409, the net result considered in the consolidated financial statements of the group, at December 31, 2012, being ThUS$ (45,163).

(b)Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

On November 26, 2010 LAN Pax Group S.A., a subsidiary of the Company, acquired 98.942% of the Colombian company Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

This acquisition was made through the purchase of 100% of the shares of the Panamanian corporations AKEMI Holdings S.A. and SAIPAN Holding S.A., which owned the aforementioned percentage of AIRES S.A. The purchase price was ThUS$ 12,000.

Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A., founded in 1980, at the date of acquisition it was the second largest operator within the Colombian domestic market with a market share of 22%. AIRES S.A. offered regular service to 27 domestic destinations within Colombia as well as 3 international destinations. Synergies are expected between the combination of AIRES S.A. in the Colombian market and efficiency of the business model of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Additionally, better performance is expected by the business of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (passengers and cargo) through an increase in coverage in Latin America.

The Business Combination is recognized in the statement of financial position of the Company and Subsidiaries as Goodwill of ThUS$ 94,224.

Summary statement of financial position at acquisition date:    
   ThUS$     ThUS$ 

Current assets

   27,315   Current liabilities   125,193  

Non-current assets

   31,652   Non-current liabilities   20,327  
   Equity   (86,553
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   58,967   Total liabilities   58,967  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Controlling interest

   (82,224   
Goodwill determination:    
   ThUS$       

Controlling interest

   82,224     

Purchase price

   12,000     
  

 

 

    

Goodwill

   94,224     
  

 

 

    

(c)AEROASIS S.A.

Dated February 15, 2011, LAN Pax Group S.A. subsidiary of the Company acquired 100% of Colombian society AEROASIS S.A. The purchase price was ThUS$ 3,541.

AEROASIS S.A. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Colombia through Public Deed No. 1,206 dated May 2, 2006.

The Business Combination is recognized in the statement of financial position of the Company and Subsidiaries as goodwill of ThUS$ 6,736.

Summary statement of financial position at acquisition date:          
   ThUS$     ThUS$ 

Current assets

   1,802   Current liabilities   8,007  

Non-current assets

   3,010   Non-current liabilities   —    
   Equity   (3,195
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   4,812   Total liabilities   4,812  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Controlling interest

   (3,195   
Goodwill determination:       
   ThUS$       

Controlling interest

   3,195     

Purchase price

   3,541     
  

 

 

    

Goodwill

   6,736     
  

 

 

    

NOTE 18 –19 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The composition by category of property,Property, plant and equipment is as follows:

 

 Gross Book Value Acumulated depreciation Net Book Value   Gross Book Value   Accumulated depreciation Net Book Value 
 As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
 As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
 As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2012
 As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Construction in progress

  1,087,563    715,603    —      —      1,087,563    715,603     1,153,003     1,087,563     —      —      1,153,003     1,087,563  

Land

  35,673    35,538    —      —      35,673    35,538     65,307     35,673     —      —      65,307     35,673  

Buildings

  101,123    101,181    (23,185  (21,060  77,938    80,121     245,939     101,123     (70,869  (23,185  175,070     77,938  

Plant and equipment

  5,380,663    4,816,723    (1,238,678  (1,153,587  4,141,985    3,663,136     7,946,519     5,335,840     (1,640,530  (1,211,814  6,305,989     4,124,026  

Own aircraft

   6,979,986     4,921,907     (1,278,738  (1,123,871  5,701,248     3,798,036  

Other

   966,533     413,933     (361,792  (87,943  604,741     325,990  

Machinery

   76,956     3,376     (41,799  (1,998  35,157     1,378  

Information technology equipment

  89,678    83,711    (67,087  (65,112  22,591    18,599     171,568     89,678     (131,105  (67,087  40,463     22,591  

Fixed installations and accessories

  64,936    52,954    (29,838  (25,951  35,098    27,003     81,251     64,936     (38,908  (29,838  42,343     35,098  

Motor vehicles

  3,714    3,269    (2,077  (1,979  1,637    1,290     70,706     45,161     (48,451  (26,943  22,255     18,218  

Leasehold improvements

  94,485    87,168    (62,986  (43,048  31,499    44,120     87,004     94,485     (65,276  (62,986  21,728     31,499  

Other property, plants and equip ment

  832,772    646,236    (338,774  (283,216  493,998    363,020  

Other property, plants and equipment

   5,812,401     832,772     (1,875,827  (338,774  3,936,574     493,998  

Financial leasing aircraft

   5,657,286     772,887     (1,835,736  (308,805  3,821,550     464,082  

Other

   155,115     59,885     (40,091  (29,969  115,024     29,916  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  7,690,607    6,542,383    (1,762,625  (1,593,953  5,927,982    4,948,430     15,710,654     7,690,607     (3,912,765  (1,762,625  11,797,889     5,927,982  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

F-1-49


LOGOThe balance at December 31, 2012 of Property, plant and equipment, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

The movement in the different categories of property,Property, plant and equipment from January 1, 20102011 to December 31, 20112012 is shown below:

(a)As of December 31, 2010

   Construction
in progress
  Land  Buildings
Net
  Plant and
equipment
Net
  Information
technology
equipment
Net
  Fixed
installations
& accessories
Net
  Motor
vehicles
Net
  Leasehold
improvements
Net
  Other
property,
plant and
equipment
Net
  Property,
Plant and
equipment
Net
 
  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

  264,259    35,538    81,966    3,231,682    15,043    23,659    951    50,286    493,172    4,196,556  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  10,229    —      115    571,422    9,516    2,341    420    2,410    6,673    603,126  

Acquisitions through business combination

  —      —      1,006    490    137    335    107    —      480    2,555  

Disposals

  —      —      —      (190  —      —      (7  —      (2  (199

Transfers (to) from non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as Held for Sale

  —      —      —      2,552    —      —      —      —      —      2,552  

Retirements

  —      —      —      (6,633  (536  (2  (12  —      (2,550  (9,733

Depreciation

  —      —      (2,315  (235,800  (5,217  (3,997  (172  (16,797  (32,315  (296,613

Increases (decreases) due to exchanges differences

  (62  —      —      (857  16    (13  (3  —      (27  (946

Other increases (decreases)

  441,177    —      (651  100,470    (360  4,680    6    8,221    (102,411  451,132  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Changes, total

  451,344    —      (1,845  431,454    3,556    3,344    339    (6,166  (130,152  751,874  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010

  715,603    35,538    80,121    3,663,136    18,599    27,003    1,290    44,120    363,020    4,948,430  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

F-1-50


LOGO

(a) As of December 31, 2011

 

(b)As of December 31, 2011

 Construction
in progress
 Land Buildings
Net
 Plant and
equipment
Net
 Information
technology
equipment
Net
 Fixed
installations
& accessories
Net
 Motor
vehicles
Net
 Leasehold
improvements
Net
 Other
property,
plant and
equipment
Net
 Property,
Plant and
equipment
Net
  Construction
in progress
 Land Buildings
net
 Plant and
equipment
net
 Information
technology
equipment
net
 Fixed
installations
& accessories
net
 Motor
vehicles
net
 Leasehold
improvements
net
 Other
property,
plant and
equipment
net
 Property,
Plant and
equipment
net
 
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

  715,603    35,538    80,121    3,663,136    18,599    27,003    1,290    44,120    363,020    4,948,430    715,603    35,538    80,121    3,663,136    18,599    27,003    1,290    44,120    363,020    4,948,430  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions

  29,898    —      1,111    1,028,568    11,885    6,663    543    6,555    19,072    1,104,295    29,898    —      1,111    1,028,568    11,885    6,663    543    6,555    19,072    1,104,295  

Acquisitions through business combination

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      16    16    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      16    16  

Disposals

  —      —      (2,681  (109,936  (8  —      (6  —      (537  (113,168  —      —      (2,681  (109,936  (8  —      (6  —      (537  (113,168

Transfers (to) from non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as Held for Sale

  (127  —      —      (112  (1,195  (588  (1  —      (115  (2,138

Transfers (to) from non-current assets and disposal groups

  (127  —      —      (112  (1,195  (588  (1  —      (115  (2,138

Retirements

  (150  —      (4  (4,817  (85  (23  (17  —      (332  (5,428  (150  —      (4  (4,817  (85  (23  (17  —      (332  (5,428

Depreciation

  —      —      (3,302  (265,062  (6,354  (3,602  (215  (19,938  (30,608  (329,081

Increases (decreases) due to exchanges differences

  (852  —      (95  (771  (63  (54  18    —      (95  (1,912

Depreciation expense

  —      —      (3,302  (265,062  (6,354  (3,602  (215  (19,938  (30,608  (329,081

Conversion difference subsidiaries

  (852  —      (95  (771  (63  (54  18    —      (95  (1,912

Other increases (decreases)

  343,191    135    2,788    (169,021  (188  5,699    25    762    143,577    326,968    343,191    135    2,788    (169,021  (188  5,699    25    762    143,577    326,968  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Changes, total

  371,960    135    (2,183  478,849    3,992    8,095    347    (12,621  130,978    979,552    371,960    135    (2,183  478,849    3,992    8,095    347    (12,621  130,978    979,552  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2011

  1,087,563    35,673    77,938    4,141,985    22,591    35,098    1,637    31,499    493,998    5,927,982    1,087,563    35,673    77,938    4,141,985    22,591    35,098    1,637    31,499    493,998    5,927,982  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

F-1-51


LOGO

(b) As of December 31, 2012

 

(c)Composition of the fleet
   Construction
in progress
  Land  Buildings
net
  Plant and
equipment
net
  Information
technology
equipment
net
  Fixed
installations
& accessories
net
  Motor
vehicles
net
  Leasehold
improvements
net
  Other
property,
plant and
equipment
net
  Property,
plant and
equipment
net
 
  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

  1,087,563    35,673    77,938    4,141,985    22,591    35,098    1,637    31,499    493,998    5,927,982  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  34,885    —      8,805    2,783,869    11,626    7,836    458    4,668    154,000    3,006,147  

Acquisitions through business combination

  553,781    46,373    87,338    464,415    16,990    1,697    4,099    —      3,058,899    4,233,592  

Disposals

  (27  (5,116  (4,821  (73,654  (15  —      (28  —      (5  (83,666

Transfers (to) from non-current assets and disposal groups

  (2,256  (11,895  —      (49,910  —      —      —      —      —      (64,061

Retirements

  (281  —      (1,100  (127,519  (951  (262  (62  (82  (18,799  (149,056

Depreciation expenses

  —      —      (3,311  (324,189  (14,982  (6,526  (1,316  (16,432  (255,366  (622,122

Conversion difference subsidiaries

  1,844    272    (2,370  2,206    3,967    532    (100  —      16,287    22,638  

Other increases (decreases)

  (522,506  —      12,591    (458,524  1,237    3,968    34    2,075    487,560    (473,565
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Changes, total

  65,440    29,634    97,132    2,216,694    17,872    7,245    3,085    (9,771  3,442,576    5,869,907  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

  1,153,003    65,307    175,070    6,358,679    40,463    42,343    4,722    21,728    3,936,574    11,797,889  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(c) Composition of the fleet

Aircraft included in the Company’s property,Property, plant and equipment:

 

Aircraft  Model As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 

Boeing 767

  300ER  21     18  

Boeing 767

  300F  8     8  

Boeing 767

  200ER (*)  1     1  

Airbus A318

  100  10     15  

Airbus A319

  100  24     20  

Airbus A320

  200  33     24  

Airbus A340

  300  4     4  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    101     90  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Leased to Aerovías de México S.A.
Aircraft  Model  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 

Boeing 767

  300   3     —    

Boeing 767

  300ER   30     21  

Boeing 767

  300F   8     8  

Boeing 767

  200ER   —       1  

Boeing 777

  300ER   8     —    

Boeing 777

  Freighter   2     —    

Boeing 787

  800   3     —    

Airbus A 318

  100   5     10  

Airbus A 319

  100   39     24  

Airbus A 320

  200   76     33  

Airbus A 321

  200   8     —    

Airbus A 330

  200   18     —    

Airbus A 340

  300   2     4  

Airbus A 340

  500   2     —    
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     204     101  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating leases:

 

Aircraft  Model  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   Model  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 

Boeing 767

  300ER   10     10    300ER   8     10  

Boeing 767

  300F   4     3    300F   4     4  

Boeing 777

  Freighter   2     2    Freighter   2     2  

Airbus A320

  200   9     5  

Airbus A340

  300   1     1  

Airbus A 319

  100   18     —    

Airbus A 320

  200   65     9  

Airbus A 321

  200   1     —    

Airbus A 330

  200   2     —    

Airbus A 340

  300   3     1  

Boeing 737

  700   9     9    700   6     9  

Bombardier

  Dhc8-200   10     11    Dhc8-200   10     10  

Bombardier

  Dhc8-400   4     4    Dhc8-400   4     4  
    

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total

     49     45       123     49  
    

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total fleet

     150     135       327     150  
    

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

(d) Method used for the depreciation of Property, plant and equipment:

 

(d)Method used for the depreciation of property, plant and equipment:

  Method  Useful life  Method  Useful life 
  minimum  maximum   minimum   maximum 

Buildings

  Straight line without residual value  20  50  

Straight line without residual value

   20     50  

Plant and equipment

  Straight line with residual value of 20% in the short-haul fleet and 36% in the long-haul fleet (*)  5  20  

Straight line with residual value of 20% in the short-haul fleet and 36% in the long-haul fleet. (*)

   5     20  

Information technology equipment

  Straight line without residual value  5  10  

Straight line without residual value

   5     10  

Fixed installations and accessories

  Straight line without residual value  10  10  

Straight line without residual value

   10     10  

Motor vehicle

  Straight line without residual value  10  10  

Straight line without residual value

   10     10  

Leasehold improvements

  Straight line without residual value  5  5  

Straight line without residual value

   5     5  

Other property, plant and equipment

  Straight line with residual value of 20% in the short-haul fleet and 36% in the long-haul fleet (*)  3  20  

Straight line with residual value of 20% in the short-haul fleet and 36% in the long-haul fleet. (*)

   3     20  

 

(*)Except for certain technical components, which are depreciated on the basis of cycles and flight hours.

As a result of the Business Combination with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries 65 aircraft were incorporated with remarketing clause (**) under modality of financial leasing, which are depreciated according to the duration of their contracts, between 12 and 18 years. Its residual values are estimated according to market value at the end of such contracts.

F-1-52


LOGO

Additionally, for the same Business Combination, 5 aircraft were added under operating lease contracts, which according to the stated policy, are classified as finance leases because the present value of the payments represents most of the economic value of the property. The useful life assigned is 6 years, according to the duration of the contracts.

 

(**)Aircraft with remarketing clause are those that are required to sell at the end of the contract.

The depreciation charged to income in the period, ended December 31, 2011, which is included in the consolidated statement of income, amounts to ThUS$ 329,081622,122 (ThUS$ 296,613329,081 for the period ended December 31, 2010)2011). Depreciation charges for the year are recognized in Cost of Salessales and Administrative Expensesadministrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income.

(e) Additional information regarding Property, plant and equipment:

e)Additional information regarding property, plant and equipment:

 

 i)(i)Property, plant and equipment pledged as guarantee:

In the yearperiod ended December 31, 20112012 direct guarantees were added for sixteen aircraft, nine of them corresponding to the Airbus A320-200 fleet, four to the Airbus A319-100 fleet and three to Boeing B767-300 fleet. Moreover, in the second quarter of 2011 the Company sold three aircraft Airbus A318-100 fleetA319-100, seven Airbus A320-200 aircraft, nine Boeing 767-300 aircraft, six Boeing 777-300 aircraft (four passengers and in the third quarter two more of the same aircraft A318-100 fleet. Additionally, duringcargo) and three Boeing 787-800 aircraft. During the first quarter 2011, the Company sold its participation in the permanent establishments CernicaloQuetro Leasing LLC, Codorniz Leasing Limited, Pochard Leasing LLC, Garza Leasing LLC and PetrelCaiquen Leasing LLC. ThereforeAs such the Company eliminated direct guarantees associated with fivetwo aircraft Airbus A318-100A319-100 and threeseven aircraft Boeing 767-300 (two freighter(six passenger aircrafts and one passenger aircrafts)freighter). Additionally, during the second semester of 2012 the guaranties were eliminated for three aircraft A318-100 due to the sale, of two aircraft A340-300 and one aircraft B767-300F.

Description of property,Property, plant and equipment pledged as guarantee:

 

         

As of

December 31, 2011

   

As of

December 31, 2010

 

Creditor of guarantee

  Assets
committed
  Fleet  Existing
Debt
   Book
Value
   Existing
Debt
   Book
Value
 
         ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Wilmington

  Aircraft and  Boeing 767   1,032,921     1,305,915     1,043,290     1,304,699  

Trust Company

  engines  Boeing 777   13,750     24,664     18,088     25,915  

BNP Paribas

  Aircraft and  Airbus A318   187,705     239,530     299,422     359,944  
  engines  Airbus A319   390,614     521,829     297,320     370,476  
    Airbus A320   695,308     855,214     407,275     478,082  

Credite Agricole (*)

  Aircraft and  Airbus A319   93,019     158,355     108,803     178,342  
  engines  Airbus A320   34,530     149,486     58,236     172,426  
    Airbus A340   54,491     215,978     89,378     234,892  
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total direct guarantee

       2,502,338     3,470,971     2,321,812     3,124,776  
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Calyon creditor of guarantee renamed Credite Agricole
         

As of

December 31, 2012

   

As of

December 31,2011

 
   Assets     Existing   Book   Existing   Book 

Creditor of guarantee

  

committed

  Fleet  Debt   Value   Debt   Value 
         ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Wilmington Trust Company

  Aircraft and engines  Boeing 767   1,296,704     1,640,071     1,032,921     1,305,915  
    Boeing 787   858,221     937,074     13,750     24,664  

Banco Santander S.A .

  Aircraft and engines  Airbus A319   81,698     111,458     89,287     117,106  
    Airbus A320   626,317     782,609     411,043     504,827  

BNP Paribas

  Aircraft and engines  Airbus A318   121,172     150,026     187,705     239,530  
    Airbus A319   360,100     501,836     301,327     404,723  
    Airbus A320   261,139     333,105     284,265     350,387  

Credit Agricole (*)

  Aircraft and engines  Airbus A319   44,002     107,625     93,019     114,376  
    Airbus A320   68,096     156,355     34,530     163,746  
    Airbus A340   19,531     105,349     54,491     215,978  

JP Morgan

  Aircraft and engines  Boeing 777   280,698     324,159     —       —    
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total direct guarantee

       4,017,678     5,149,667     2,502,338     3,441,252  
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amounts of existing debt are presented at nominal value. Book value corresponds to the carrying value of the goods provided as guarantees.

Additionally, there are indirect guarantees related to assets recorded in property,Property, plant and equipment whose total debt at December 31, 20112012 amounted to ThUS $ThUS$ 2,888,753 (ThUS$ 316,859 (ThUS $ 227,218 at December 31, 2010)2011). The book value of assets with indirect guarantees as of December 31, 20112012 amounts to ThUS$ 504,3553,777,715 (ThUS$ 328,838504,355 as of December 31, 2010)2011).

F-1-53


LOGO

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Property, plant and equipment, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

 

 ii)(ii)Commitments and others

Fully depreciated assets and commitments for future purchases are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Gross book value of fully depreciated property, plant and equipment still in use

   43,626     57,612     188,214     43,626  

Commitments for the acquisition of aircraft

   14,500,000     12,350,000  

Commitments for the acquisition of aircraft (*)

   24,500,000     14,500,000  

(*)According to the manufacturer’s price list.

In December 2009, the Company signed a purchase commitment with Airbus S.A.S. for the purchase of 30 aircraft of the A320 family with deliveries between 2011 and 2016. Later, in December 2010 the Company made anothersigned a new commitment to thethis manufacturer for the purchaseacquisition of 50 A320aircraft of the same family aircraft with deliveries between 2012 and 2016. Additionally, in June 2011, the Company signed a contract was signed for 20 additional aircraft of the A320 NEO family with deliveries between 2017 and 2018.

With regards to the above, as of December 31, 2011,2012, and as a result of different aircraft purchase contracts signed with Airbus S.A.S., there remain 9078 Airbus aircraft of the A320 family to be delivered between 20122013 and 2018. The approximate amount is ThUS$ 7,000,000,6,400,000, according to the manufacturer’s price list. Additionally, the Company has active purchase options for 4 A320 NEO aircraft.

In addition,Otherwise purchase contracts were signed with The Boeing Company induring February, May and December 2011, for 3, 5 and 2 B767-300 aircraft respectively.

As of December 31, 20112012, and as a as result of different aircraft purchase contracts signed with The Boeing Company, 13 B767-300 aircraft remain to be delivered between 2012receive a total of 4 767-300 aircraft during 2013 and 2013, 2 B77-Freighter aircraft for delivery in 2012 and 26 B78723 787 Dreamliner aircraft, with delivery dates from 2012.between 2013 and 2017. The approximate amount, is ThUS$ 7,500,000, according to the manufacturer’s price list. In addition,list, is ThUS$ 5,000,000. Additionally, the Company has valid purchase options over 1 B777- Freighter aircraft andfor 15 B787787 Dreamliner aircraft.

The acquisition of thethese aircraft is part of the strategic plan for long haulthe long-term fleet. This plan also meansinvolves the sale of 15 aircraft model Airbus A318 model between 2011 and 2013. It is estimated that this sale will have no significant impact on results. During the third quarter of 2011 the first 5 aircraft were sold. During 2012 sold another 3 and during 2013 the Company soldplans to sell the last 7.

Additionally, as a result of the Business Combination with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries the following commitments are incorporated:

In November 2006, a purchase commitment was signed with Airbus S.A.S. for the acquisition of 31 A320 family aircraft and 6 A330-200 aircraft, with deliveries between 2007 and 2010. Subsequently, in January 2008 signed a new commitment for the acquisition of 20 additional A320 family aircraft and 4 aircraft A330-200, with deliveries between 2010 and 2014, also signed a purchase commitment for 22 A350 aircraft. In July 2010, signed a purchase commitment with Airbus S.A.S. for the acquisition of 20 A320 family aircraft with deliveries between 2014 and 2015 and on the same date the option was exercised to purchase 5 A350. In October 2011, a new commitment was signed to this manufacturer for the acquisition of 10 additional aircraft of the A320 family with deliveries between 2016 and 2017, plus 22 family aircraft A320 NEO with deliveries between 2016 and 2018.

With the above, at December 31, 2012, as a result of the different aircraft purchase agreements signed with Airbus S.A.S., remain to receive 71 aircraft Airbus A320 family, with deliveries between 2013 and 2018, and 27 Airbus aircraft A350 family with delivery dates starting from 2015. Additionally, the Company has valid purchase options for 10 A320 family aircraft and 5 Airbus NEO A350.

In December 2008, a new commitment purchase agreement was signed with The Boeing Company for 2 B777 aircraft plannedwith deliveries in 2013, and in February 2011 an agreement was signed for the purchase of another 2 B777 aircraft with deliveries in 2014.

With the above, at December 31, 2012, due to be sold during 2011, thus completing the planned salevarious purchase contracts signed with The Boeing Company, remain to receive 4 B777 aircraft. Additionally, the Company has valid purchase options for 2 B777 aircraft.

The approximate amount of 5 aircraft this year.individual purchase contracts incorporated for the effect of the Business Combination with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries is ThUS$ 13,100,000, according to the manufacturers price list.

 

 iii)(iii)Capitalized interest costs with respect to property,Property, plant and equipment.

 

     

For the year ended

December 31,

      For the periods ended
December 31,
 
     2011   2010      2012   2011 

Average rate of capitalization of capitalized interest costs

  %   3.51     4.31    %   2.60     3.51  

Costs of capitalized interest

  ThUS$   33,342     18,400    ThUS$   45,069     33,342  

F-1-54


LOGO

iv)(iv)Financial leases

The detail of the main financial leases is as follows:

 

Lessor  Aircraft  Model  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   Aircraft  Model  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 

Agonandra Statutory Trust

  Airbus A319  100   4     —    

Agonandra Statutory Trust

  Airbus A320  200   2     —    

Air Canada

  Airbus A340  500   2     —    

AW MS I (AW AS)

  Boeing 767  300   3     —    

Bluebird Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300F   2     2    Boeing 767  300F   2     2  

Caiquen Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300F   1     —    

Cernicalo Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300F   2     2  

Codorniz Leasing Limited

  Airbus A319  100   2     —    

Eagle Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300ER   1     2    Boeing 767  300ER   1     1  

FLYAFI 1 S.R.L.

  Boeing 777  300ER   1     —    

FLYAFI 2 S.R.L.

  Boeing 777  300ER   1     —    

FLYAFI 3 S.R.L.

  Boeing 777  300ER   1     —    

Forderum Holding B.V. (GECAS)

  Airbus A320  200   2     —    

Garza Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300ER   1     —    

General Electric Capital Corporation

  Airbus A330  200   6     —    

Intraelo BET A Corporation (KFW )

  Airbus A320  200   1     —    

Juliana Leasing Limited

  Airbus A320  200   2     —    

Linnet Leasing Limited

  Airbus A320  200   4     4  

NBB Rio de Janeiro Lease CO and Brasilia Lease LLC (BBAM)

  Airbus A320  200   1     —    

NBB São Paulo Lease CO. Limited (BBAM)

  Airbus A321  200   1     —    

Petrel Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300ER   1     1  

Pochard Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300ER   2     —    

Quetro Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300ER   3     —    

Seagull Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300F   1     1    Boeing 767  300F   —       1  

Cernicalo Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300F   2     —    

Petrel Leasing LLC

  Boeing 767  300ER   1     —    

Linnet Leasing Limited

  Airbus A320  200   4     4  

SG Infraestructure Italia S.R.L.

  Boeing 777  300ER   1     —    

SL Alcyone LT D (Showa)

  Airbus A320  200   1     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation B.V.

  Airbus A320  200   12     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation B.V.

  Airbus A330  200   1     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation II B.V.

  Airbus A319  100   5     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation II B.V.

  Airbus A320  200   2     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation III B.V.

  Airbus A319  100   3     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation III B.V.

  Airbus A320  200   12     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation III B.V.

  Airbus A321  200   7     —    

TMF Interlease Aviation III B.V.

  Airbus A330  200   10     —    

Wacapou Leasing S.A

  Airbus A320  200   1     —    

Wells Fargo Bank North National Association (ILFC)

  Airbus A330  200   1     —    
      

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

 

Total

       11     9         102     11  
      

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

 

Leasing contracts where the Company acts as the lessee of aircrafts establish aduration between 12 and 18 year termterms and semi-annual, quarterly and monthly payments of obligations.

Additionally, the lessee will have the obligationsobligation to contract and maintain active the insurance coverage for the aircraft, perform maintenance on the aircraft and update the airworthiness certificates at their own cost.

Fixed assets acquired under financial leases are classified as Other property, plant and equipment. As of December 31, 2011,2012 the Company had elevenone hundred and two aircraft as financial leases (nine(eleven aircraft as of December 31, 2010)2011).

InDuring the year ended December 31, 2011,first quarter of 2012, due to the sale of its participation in the permanent establishments CernicaloCaiquen Leasing LLC, Codorniz Leasing Limited, Garza Leasing LLC, Pochard Leasing LLC and PetrelQuetro Leasing LLC, the Company increased its number of aircraft on lease by threeseven Boeing 767-300 (two(one freighter and onesix passenger aircrafts). and two A319-100. Therefore, these aircraft were reclassified from the Plant and equipment category to the category otherOther property plant and equipment. Additionally,

As a result of the Business Combination 81 aircraft capital leases were added as financial leasing, and during the third quarter of 2012 two more Airbus A320-200 were added in November 2011 the Company excercised a purchase option for a B767-300 freighter belongs to the Eagle Leasing LLC, which was reclassified from Other property, plant and equipment to Plant and equipment.this way.

The book value of assets under financial leases as of December 31, 20112012 amounts to ThUS$ 464,0823,863,193 (ThUS$ 328,838464,082 as of December 31, 2010)2011).

The minimum payments under financial leases are as follows:

As of December 31, 20112012

 

    Gross
Value
   Interest  Present
Value
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

No later than one year

   78,369     (7,622  70,747  

Between one and five years

   207,365     (18,657  188,708  

Over five years

   59,152     (2,078  57,074  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   344,886     (28,357  316,529  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

F-1-55


LOGO

   Gross
Value
   Interest  Present
Value
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

No later than one year

   523,033     (66,090  456,943  

Between one and five years

   1,687,596     (186,145  1,501,451  

Over five years

   1,135,262     (57,455  1,077,807  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   3,345,891     (309,690  3,036,201  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

As of December 31, 20102011

 

  Gross
Value
   Interest Present
Value
   Gross
Value
   Interest Present
Value
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

No later than one year

   57,976     (3,679  54,297     78,369     (7,622  70,747  

Between one and five years

   127,370     (7,421  119,949     207,365     (18,657  188,708  

Over five years

   55,106     (1,781  53,325     59,152     (2,078  57,074  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

   240,452     (12,881  227,571     344,886     (28,357  316,529  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

NOTE 19 – INCOME20 - TAXES AND DEFERRED TAXES

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legal right to offset assets and liabilities for income taxes relating to the same tax authority.

The balances of deferred taxes are as follows:

 

  Assets Liabilities   Assets Liabilities 

Concept

  As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
 As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
   As of As of As of As of 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, 
  2012 2011 2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Depreciation

   (547  (415  338,741    290,254     (662  (547  548,618    338,741  

Leased assets

   —      —      105,554    65,240  

Amortization

   14,255    12,286    36,667    29,606     15,148    14,255    69,335    36,667  

Provisions

   7,036    8,128    48,681    23,017     16,266    9,998    (216,733  47,757  

Post-employment benefit obligations

   865    622    (924  (982

Revaluation of financial instruments

   —      —      (28,788  (21,926   5,178    —      (30,110  (28,788

Tax losses

   35,300    13,229    —      —       105,652    35,300    (328,608  (83,297

Revaluation property, plant and equipment

   —      —      (45,579  —    

Intangibles

   —      —      498,674    —    

Others

   3,239    4,234    (24,752  (7,957   3,047    1,142    (12,092  (6,695
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   60,148    38,084    369,625    312,012     144,629    60,148    589,059    369,625  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 of deferred taxes, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

The balance of deferred tax assets and liabilities are composed principally of temporary differences to reverse in the long term.

Movements of deferredDeferred tax assets and liabilities from January 1, 20102011 to December 31, 20112012 are as follows:

 

(a)From January 1 to December 31, 20102011

 

   Beginning
balance
asset (liability)
  Recognized in
consolidated
income
  Recognized in
comprehensive
income
  Incorporation by
business
combinations
   Others   Ending
balance
asset (liability)
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Depreciation

   (222,188  (68,481  —      —       —       (290,669

Amortization

   (22,453  (5,948  —      11,081     —       (17,320

Provisions

   (2,102  (17,968  —      5,181     —       (14,889

Post-employment benefit obligations

   1,183    (196  —      617     —       1,604  

Revaluation of financial instruments

   18,891    —      3,035    —       —       21,926  

Tax losses

   5,013    (1,303  —      9,519     —       13,229  

Others

   (8,311  16,645    (120  2,545     1,432     12,191  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   (229,967  (77,251  2,915    28,943     1,432     (273,928
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-1-56


LOGO

         Recognized                  
   Beginning  Recognized in  in other   Incorporation by            Ending 
   balance  consolidated  comprehensive   business         Sale of  balance 
   asset (liability)  income  income   combinations   Reclassifications  Others  investment  asset (liability) 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Depreciation

   (290,669  (48,614  —       —       —      —      (5  (339,288

Leased assets

   (59,848  (5,392         (65,240

Amortization

   (17,320  (8,903  —       3,811     —      —      —      (22,412

Provisions

   (14,889  (22,482  —       —       —      —      (388  (37,759

Post-employment benefit obligations

   1,604    (1,604  —       —       —      —      —      —    

Revaluation of financial instruments

   21,926    —      6,862     —       —      —      —      28,788  

Tax losses

   13,229    112,013    —       —       (6,645  —      —      118,597  

Others

   72,039    (63,460  1,846     —       —      (2,521  (67  7,837  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (273,928  (38,442  8,708     3,811     (6,645  (2,521  (460  (309,477
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(b)From January 1 to December 31, 20112012

 

      Recognized           
  Opening Recognized in in other Incorporation by Exchange Effect from   Ending 
  balance consolidated comprehensive business rate change in   balance 
 Beginning
balance
asset (liability)
 Recognized in
consolidated
income
 Recognized in
comprehensive
income
 Incorporation by
business
combinations
 Reclassification Others Sale of
investment
 Ending
balance
asset (liability)
   assets/liabilities income income combination variation tax rate Others asset (liability) 
 ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Depreciation

  (290,669  (48,614  —      —      —      —      (5  (339,288   (339,288  (86,740  —      (63,106  (370  (59,776  —      (549,280

Leased assets

   (65,240  (28,801  —      —      —      (11,513  —      (105,554

Amortization

  (17,320  (8,903  —      3,811    —      —      —      (22,412   (22,412  (6,580  —      (18,614  (110  (6,471  —      (54,187

Provisions

  (14,889  (26,368  —      —      —      —      (388  (41,645   (37,759  (8,823  —      286,254    1,680    (8,353  —      232,999  

Post-employment benefit obligations

  1,604    185    —      —      —      —      —      1,789  

Revaluation of financial instruments

  21,926    —      6,862    —      —      —      —      28,788     28,788    (5,348  (2,623  9,335    56    5,080    —      35,288  

Tax losses

  13,229    28,716    —      —      (6,645  —      —      35,300     118,597    110,930    —      188,910    1,110    14,713    —      434,260  

Revaluation propety, plant and equipment

   —      —      —      45,313    266    —      —      45,579  

Intangibles

   —      —      —      (495,762  (2,912  —      —      (498,674

Others

  12,191    16,542    1,846    —      —      (2,521  (67  27,991     7,837    10,422    (2,734  14,440    86    701    (15,613  15,139  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  (273,928  (38,442  8,708    3,811    (6,645  (2,521  (460  (309,477   (309,477  (14,940  (5,357  (33,230  (194  (65,619  (15,613  (444,430
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax assets not recognized:

 

  As of   As of 
  December 31,   December 31, 
  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   2012   2011 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Temporary differences

   2,152     2,152     —       2,152  

Tax losses

   35     1,662     1,439     35  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Deferred tax assets not recognized

   2,187     3,814     1,439     2,187  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred income tax assets are recognized foron tax loss carry-forwards, are recognized to the extent that the realization of the relatedit is likely to provide relevant tax benefit through future taxable profits is probable.profits. The Company didhas not recognizerecognized deferred income tax assets of ThUS$ 351,439 (ThUS$ 1,66235 at December 31, 2010) in respect2011) compared to losses amounting toa loss of ThUS$ 1035,265 (ThUS$ 5,992103 at December 31, 2010) that can be carried2011) to offset against future taxable income.years tax benefits.

Expense (income) for deferred and current income taxes for the yearsperiods ended at December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, respectively, are as follows:

 

  For the periods ended 
  For the year ended
December 31,
   December 31 
  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Expense for current income tax

      

Current tax expense

   19,470    8,890     35,527    19,470  

Adjustment to previous year’s current tax

   3,877    (3,153   (13,886  3,877  

Other current tax expense (income)

   —      (1,881   12    —    
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current tax expense, net

   23,347    3,856     21,653    23,347  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Expense for deferred income taxes

      

Deferred expense (income) for taxes related to the creation and reversal of temporary differences

   40,051    75,284     79,155    40,051  

Reduction (increase) in value of deferred tax assets

   (1,609  1,967     

During the evaluation of its usefulness

   1,404    (1,609
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax expense, net

   38,442    77,251     80,559    38,442  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Income tax expense

   61,789    81,107     102,212    61,789  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

F-1-57


LOGO

Composition of income tax expense (income):

 

  For the periods ended 
  For the year ended
December 31,
   December 31, 
  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Current tax expense, net, foreign

   4,486    1,121     31,791    4,486  

Current tax expense, net, Chile

   18,861    2,735     (10,138  18,861  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current tax expense, net

   23,347    3,856     21,653    23,347  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax expense, net, foreign

   (20,876  3,724     (54,980  (20,876

Deferred tax expense, net, Chile

   59,318    73,527     135,539    59,318  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax expense, net, total

   38,442    77,251     80,559    38,442  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Income tax expense

   61,789    81,107     102,212    61,789  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Reconciliation of tax expense using the legal rate to the tax expense using the effective rate:

 

  For the periods ended 
  For the year ended
December 31,
   December 31, 
  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Tax expense using the legal rate

   76,410    85,138     22,633    76,410  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Tax effect of legal rate change

   (10,571  —       70,441    (10,571

Tax effect of rates in other jurisdictions

   1,916    1,491     (10,686  1,916  

Tax effect of non-taxable operating revenues

   (11,094  (4,089   (7,029  (11,094

Tax effect of disallowable expenses

   5,087    849     27,437    5,087  

Tax effect of current period tax losses not recognized

   —      1,967  

Other increases (decreases)

   41    (4,249   (584  41  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total adjustments to tax expense using the legal rate

   (14,621  (4,031   79,579    (14,621
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Tax expense using the effective rate

   61,789    81,107     102,212    61,789  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Reconciliation of legal tax rate to effective tax rate:

 

  For the periods ended 
  For the year ended
December 31,
   December 31, 
      2011         2010       2012 2011 
  % %   % % 

Legal tax rate

   20.00    17.00     20.00    20.00  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Effect of tax rates for legal rate change

   (2.77  —       62.24    (2.77

Effect of tax rates in other jurisdictions

   0.50    0.30     (9.44  0.50  

Effect of tax rate on non-taxable operating revenues

   (2.89  (0.82   (6.21  (2.89

Effect of tax rate on disallowable expenses

   1.33    0.17     24.24    1.33  

Effect of tax rate on use of not-previously recognized tax losses

   —      0.39  

Other increase (decrease)

   0.01    (0.84   (0.52  0.01  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total adjustment to the legal tax rate

   (3.82  (0.80   70.31    (3.82
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total effective tax rate

   16.18    16.20     90.31    16.18  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

On September 27, 2012, the Law N° 20,630 was published in the Official Journal that “Improves Tax Legislation and Finance Education Reform”. Among the major tax reforms that the amending Law contains, the First Category Tax Rate was modified which must be declared and paid beginning in the 2013 tax year.

F-1-58The above implies, that the rate of income tax for the tax year 2013 is 20%. Therefore, for purposes of the closing financial statements beginning as of September 30, 2012, this should be considered in determining the provision for income taxes and the determination of deferred tax rate of 20%.


LOGOThereby, at December 31, 2012 the Company had tax expense considering the increased rate of 17% to 20%, which meant a higher recorded tax expense by ThUS$ 70,441.

Deferred taxes related to items charged to net equity:

 

  For the periods ended 
  For the year ended
December 31,
   December 31, 
  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Aggregate deferred taxation of components of other comprehensive income

   8,708    2,915     (5,357  8,708  

Aggregate deferred taxation related to items charged to net equity

   (355  (599   (257  (355
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total deferred taxes related to items charged to net equity

   8,353    2,316     (5,614  8,353  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax effects of the components of other comprehensive income:

 

  As of December 31, 2012 
    Income tax Amount 
  As of December 31, 2011   Amount before expense after 
  Amount before
Taxes
   Income tax
expense
(income)
 Amount
after
Taxes
   Taxes (income) Taxes 
  ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Cash-flow hedges

   40,368     (6,862  33,506     2,510    2,623    5,133  

Translation adjustment

   10,864     (1,846  9,018     (18,692  2,734    (15,958
    

 

     

 

  
     (8,708     5,357   
    

 

     

 

  
  As of December 31, 2011 
    Income tax Amount 
  Amount before expense after 
  Taxes (income) Taxes 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Cash-flow hedges

   40,368    (6,862  33,506  

Translation adjustment

   10,864    (1,846  9,018  
   

 

  
    (8,708 
   

 

  
   As of December 31, 2010 
   Amount before
Taxes
  Income tax
expense
(income)
  Amount
after
Taxes
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Cash-flow hedges

   17,855    (3,035  14,820  

Translation adjustment

   (708  120    (588
   

 

 

  
    (2,915 
   

 

 

  

NOTE 20 –21 - OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

The composition of otherOther financial liabilities is as follows:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

(a) Bank loans

   537,334     495,261  

(b) Other financial liabilities

   4,907     5,321  

(c) Hedge liabilities

   40,016     42,042  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Current

   582,257     542,624  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

(a) Bank loans

   2,978,973     2,450,033  

(b) Other financial liabilities

   9,859     14,427  

(c) Hedge liabilities

   120,304     97,888  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Non-current

   3,109,136     2,562,348  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of   As of 
   December 31,   December 31, 
   2012   2011 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

(a) Interest bearing loans

   1,977,255     537,334  

(b) Derivatives not recognized as a hedge

   4,477     4,907  

(c) Hedge derivatives

   65,598     40,016  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   2,047,330     582,257  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

(a) Interest bearing loans

   7,582,302     2,978,973  

(b) Derivatives not recognized as a hedge

   5,515     9,859  

(c) Hedge derivatives

   111,040     120,304  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current

   7,698,857     3,109,136  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-1-59


LOGOThe balance at December 31, 2012 of Other financial liabilities, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

a)(a)Interest bearing loans

Obligations with credit institutions and debt instruments:

 

  As of   As of 
  December 31,   December 31, 
  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   2012   2011 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

Loans to exporters

   242,955     153,386  

Bank loans

   153,765     151,417     519,762     379  

Guaranteed obligations

   310,217     283,637     411,313     310,217  
  

 

   

 

 

Subtotal bank loans

   1,174,030     463,982  

Obligation with the public

   273,682     —    

Financial leases

   70,747     54,297     471,896     70,747  

Other loans

   2,605     5,910     57,647     2,605  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current

   537,334     495,261     1,977,255     537,334  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current

        

Bank loans

   247,725     146,884     219,319     247,725  

Guaranteed obligations

   2,159,055     2,023,666     3,432,919     2,159,055  
  

 

   

 

 

Subtotal bank loans

   3,652,238     2,406,780  

Obligation with the public

   1,123,840     —    

Financial leases

   245,782     173,274     2,615,924     245,782  

Other loans

   326,411     106,209     190,300     326,411  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current

   2,978,973     2,450,033     7,582,302     2,978,973  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total obligations with financial institutions

   3,516,307     2,945,294     9,559,557     3,516,307  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

All interest-bearing liabilities are recorded using the effective interest rate method. Under IFRS, the effective interest rate for loans with a fixed interest rate does not vary throughout the loan, while in the case of loans with variable interest rates, the effective rate changes on each date of repricing of the loan.

Currency balances that make the interest bearing loans at December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of   As of 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   December 31,   December 31, 
  2012   2011 
Currency  ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Brazilian real

   326,394     —    

Euro

   1,785     —    

US Dollar

   3,516,307     2,753,788     9,231,378     3,516,307  

Chilean Peso (*)

   —       187,101  

Colombian Peso

   —       4,405  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   3,516,307     2,945,294     9,559,557     3,516,307  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Interest-bearing loans due in installments due at December 31, 2012, at nominal value.

Class of
Liability

 

Debtor tax No

 

Debtor

 Debtor
country
 

Creditor
Tax No

 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90
days
  More than
90 days
to one
year
  More than
one to
three
years
  More than
three to
five
years
  More than
five
years
  Total
nominal
value
  Amortization Effective
rate
  Total
accounting
value
  Nominal
rate
 
                ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$    %  ThUS$  % 

Loans to
exporters

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.004.000-5 

BANCO DE CHILE

 Chile US$  30,000    —      —      —       30,000   Semiannual  2.17  30,253    2.17
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.006.000-6 

BCI

 Chile US$  35,000    —      —      —       35,000   Semiannual  1.70  35,056    1.70
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 76.645.030-K 

ITAU

 Chile US$  75,000    —      —      —       75,000   Quarterly  1.32  75,084    1.32
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.032.000-8 

BBVA

 Chile US$  102,000    —      —      —       102,000   Annual  1.83  102,562    1.79

Bank loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  —      —      214,373    —       214,373   —    2.57  214,586    2.57
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.030.000-7 

ESTADO

 Chile US$  —      44,848    —      —       44,848   Semiannual  1.76  44,972    1.74

Guaranteed
obligations

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  2,732    8,374    23,951    26,478    41,114    102,649   Quarterly  5.69  101,461    5.01
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDITE
AGRICOLE

 France US$  12,203    33,402    35,129    6,714    —      87,448   Quarterly  3.42  87,719    3.37
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  3,474    10,696    20,753    13,014    18,211    66,148   Quarterly  4.96  65,494    4.41
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$  13,578    41,635    118,769    130,877    146,231    451,090   Quarterly  4.15  444,700    3.67
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

WELLS FARGO

 U.S.A. US$  39,546    119,458    324,890    334,407    1,141,162    1,959,463   Quarterly  2.57  1,872,616    1.76
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  9,311    28,406    79,112    84,369    208,710    409,908   Quarterly  2.71  399,854    2.10
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  4,931    14,919    40,930    42,645    117,024    220,449   Quarterly  1.39  214,434    0.85
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BTMU

 U.S.A. US$  2,514    7,638    21,116    22,221    74,733    128,222   Quarterly  1.73  123,920    1.13
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

APPLE BANK

 U.S.A. US$  1,231    3,748    10,359    10,919    37,223    63,480   Quarterly  1.71  61,411    1.11
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH

 U.S.A. US$  3,159    9,602    26,388    27,586    106,054    172,789   Quarterly  1.97  165,394    1.26
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

DEVELOPMENT BANK OF JAPAN

 U.S.A. US$  1,962    5,974    16,404    17,153    65,579    107,072   Quarterly  1.98  102,662    1.27
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

  0-E 

DEUTSCHE BANK

 U.S.A. US$  4,151    12,813    36,339    39,791    96,906    190,000   Quarterly  3.35  190,813    3.35
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

  —   

SWAP Aviones llegados

 —   US$  815    2,316    5,158    3,549    1,916    13,754   —    —      13,754    —    

Financial
leases

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  6,510    16,075    35,499    25,563    1,844    85,491   Quarterly  3.71  85,670    3.42
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDITE
AGRICOLE

 France US$  4,646    14,192    29,145    30,216    25,485    103,684   Quarterly  1.32  103,869    1.29
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  1,358    4,164    12,014    13,461    15,089    46,086   Quarterly  6.38  45,480    5.65
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

S.CHARTERED

 U.S.A. US$  1,825    5,637    —      —      —      7,462   Quarterly  1.31  7,466    1.31
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  11,899    36,603    104,071    112,116    49,572    314,261   Quarterly  5.29  311,418    4.70

Other
loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BOEING

 U.S.A. US$  —      —      146,189    —      —      146,189   —    1.86  148,582    1.86
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTROS

 —   US$  3,524    10,706    29,472    15,258    —      58,960   Quarterly  2.08  58,340    2.08
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
     

Total

    371,369    431,206    1,330,061    956,337    2,146,853    5,235,826      5,107,570   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Interest-bearing loans due in installments due at December 31, 2012, at nominal value.

Class of
Liability

 

Debtor

tax No

 

Debtor

 Debtor
country
 

Creditor
Tax No

 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90 days
 90 days
to one
year
 one to
three
years
 three to
five years
 More
than five
years
 Total
nominal
value
 Amorti-
zation
 Effective
rate
 Total
accounting
value
  Nominal
rate
                ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   % ThUS$  %

Bank
loans

 02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$ —   50,322 —   —   —   50,322 Quarterly 2.81%  64,480   2.81%
  

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CITIBANK

 Brazil US$ 24,363 5,623 —   —   —   29,986 At
Expiration
 4.03%  30,419   4.03%
  

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DO BRASIL S.A.

 Brazil US$ 42,106 109,874 —   —   —   151,980 At
Expiration
 5.35%  152,517   5.35%
  

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO IBM S.A.

 Brazil BRL 92 —   —   —   —   92 Semiannual 10.72%  336   10.72%
  

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO ITAU BBA

 Brazil US$ 45,539 117,852 —   —   —   163,391 At
Expiration
 5.65%  166,916   5.65%
  

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO SAFRA

 Brazil BRL/ US$ 17,306 14,356 784 —   —   32,446 Monthly/
At
Expiration
 7,69% /
4,01%
  32,596   7,69% /
4,01%
  

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO UNIBANCO

 Brazil BRL 61 27 —   —   —   88 Monthly 8.94%  78   8.94%
  

TAM S.A.
and
Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO BRADESCO

 Brazil BRL —   27,484 —   —   —   27,484 At
Expiration
 3.34%  27,506   3.34%
  

TAM S.A.
and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

NEDERLANDSCHE
CREDIETVERZEKER ING MAATSCHAPPIJ

 Holland US$ 96 297 861 971 2,383 4,608 Monthly 0.96%  4,674   0.95%

Obligations
with the
publics

 02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

THE BANK OF
NEW YORK

 U.S.A. US$ —   —   —   300,000 800,000 1,100,000 At
Expiration
 8.60%  1,146,251   8.41%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DO BRASIL
S.A.

 Brazil BRL 24,468 220,210 —   —   —   244,678 Semiannual 8.96%  251,271   8.56%

Financial
leases

 02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AFS INVESTMENT
IX LLC

 U.S.A. US$ 1,666 5,140 14,816 16,580 26,925 65,127 Monthly N/A  66,032   N/A
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AIR CANADA

 U.S.A. US$ 3,400 9,350 —   —   —   12,750 Monthly N/A  12,871   N/A
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AIRBUS FINANCIAL
SERVICES

 U.S.A. US$ 2,862 8,819 25,357 27,070 22,925 87,033 Monthly 2.25%  87,409   2.25%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AWAS

 U.S.A. US$ 2,991 8,975 5,651 —   —   17,617 Monthly N/A  18,588   N/A
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$ 544 1,699 4,939 5,609 11,535 24,326 Quarterly 1.50%  24,479   1.50%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 France US$ 2,372 7,237 17,064 17,384 43,929 87,986 Quarterly 3.84%  88,109   3.84%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CITIBANK

 England US$ 11,862 41,043 82,593 81,129 234,657 451,284 Quarterly 3.69%  451,201   3.69%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE-CIB

 U.S.A. US$ 4,182 12,683 67,629 10,627 19,689 114,810 Quarterly 2.29%  115,493   2.29%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE -CIB

 France US$ 15,945 47,894 126,930 121,391 182,561 494,721 Quarterly/
Semiannual
 2,01% /
0,82%
  497,986   2,01% /
0,37%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

DVB BANK SE

 Germany US$ 3,125 9,375 25,000 —   —   37,500 Quarterly 2.89%  37,570   2.89%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

DVB BANK SE

 U.S.A. US$ 456 1,369 2,821 756 —   5,402 Monthly 2.25%  5,420   2.25%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION

 U.S.A. US$ 9,140 19,967 51,979 —   —   81,086 Monthly 2.59%  81,379   2.59%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

HSBC

 France US$ 1,275 3,887 10,713 11,249 42,334 69,458 Quarterly 1.70%  69,596   0.85%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

KFW IPEX-BANK

 Germany US$ 3,709 11,343 32,226 23,604 26,888 97,770 Monthly/
Quarterly
 2,11% /
2,21%
  98,111   2,11% /
2,21%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

NATIXIS

 France US$ 5,972 20,421 59,579 66,989 163,464 316,425 Quarterly/
Semiannual
 2,62% /
3,32%
  319,002   2,62% /
3,32%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

PK AIRFINANCE US, INC.

 U.S.A. US$ 2,609 8,080 23,530 36,373 46,500 117,092 Monthly 1.96%  117,520   1.96%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

WACAPOU LEASING S.A.

 Luxembourg US$ 493 1,417 3,369 2,847 15,521 23,647 Quarterly 2.42%  23,844   2.42%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

WELLS FARGO BANK NORTHWEST N.A.

 U.S.A. US$ 1,769 5,308 3,194 —   —   10,271 Monthly 1.98%  10,300   1.98%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE MILAN BRANCH

 Italy US$ 11,355 34,574 90,164 91,964 151,968 380,025 Quarterly 1.95%  381,847   1.95%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK

 U.S.A. US$ 504 1,532 4,207 4,390 8,798 19,431 Quarterly 0.88%  19,545   0.08%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCODE LAGE LANDEN BRASIL S.A

 Brazil BRL 252 758 1,015 —   —   2,025 Monthly 7.51%  1,344   7.51%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO IBM S.A

 Brazil BRL 543 1,631 81 —   —   2,255 Monthly 10.58%  2,192   10.58%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CISLATINA ARRENDAMENTO MERCANTIL S.A

 Brazil BRL 40 13 —   —   —   53 Monthly 5.31%  50   5.31%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

HP FINANCIAL SERVICE

 Brazil BRL 189 484 74 —   —   747 Monthly 9.08%  711   9.08%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIETE AIR FRANCE

 France EUR 61 191 1,320 —   —   1,572 Monthly 6.82%  1,785   6.82%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIETE GENERALE LEASING S.A

 Brazil BRL 2,520 —   —   —   —   2,520 Monthly 0.00%  1,534   0.00%

Others
loans

 02.012.862/0001-60 

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

COMPANHIA BRASILEIRADE MEIOS DE PAGAMENTO

 Brazil BRL 31,882 9,143 —   —   —   41,025 Monthly 2.20%  41,025   2.20%
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

  
     

Total

   275,749 818,378 655,896 818,933 1,800,077 4,369,033    4,451,987   
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

  
     

Total Consolidated

   647,118 1,249,584 1,985,957 1,775,270 3,946,930 9,604,859    9,559,557   
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Interest-bearing loans due in installments to December 31, 2012, at accounting values

Class of
Liability

 

Debtor

tax No

 

Debtor

 Debtor
country
 

Creditor
Tax No

 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90 days
  More
than 90
days to
one
year
  More
than one
to three
years
  More
than
three to
five
years
  More
than five
years
  Total
accounting
value
  Amortization  Effective
rate
 Total
nominal
value
  Nominal
rate
                ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$     % ThUS$  %

Loans to export

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM
Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.004.000-5 BANCO DE CHILE Chile US$  30,253    —      —      —      —      30,253    Semiannual   2.17%  30,000   2.17%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.006.000-6 

BCI

 Chile US$  35,056    —      —      —      —      35,056    Semiannual   1.70%  35,000   1.70%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 76.645.030-K 

ITAU

 Chile US$  75,084    —      —      —      —      75,084    Quarterly   1.32%  75,000   1.32%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.032.000-8 

BBVA

 Chile US$  102,562    —      —      —      —      102,562    Annual   1.83%  102,000   1.79%

Bank
loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  214    —      214,372    —      —      214,586    —     2.57%  214,373   2.57%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.030.000-7 

ESTADO

 Chile US$  —      44,988    (16  —      —      44,972    
 
Semi
annual
  
  
 1.76%  44,848   1.74%

Guaranteed
obligations

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  3,590    8,374    22,767    25,947    40,783    101,461    Quarterly   5.69%  102,649   5.01%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$  12,475    33,402    35,128    6,714    —      87,719    Quarterly   3.42%  87,448   3.37%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  3,829    10,696    20,126    12,764    18,079    65,494    Quarterly   4.96%  66,148   4.41%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$  15,428    41,635    113,648    128,765    145,224    444,700    Quarterly   4.15%  451,090   3.67%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

WELLS FARGO

 U.S.A. US$  45,109    119,458    284,423    313,700    1,109,926    1,872,616    Quarterly   2.57%  1,959,463   1.76%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  10,711    28,406    73,422    81,588    205,727    399,854    Quarterly   2.71%  409,908   2.10%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  5,308    14,919    37,797    41,117    115,293    214,434    Quarterly   1.39%  220,449   0.85%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BTMU

 U.S.A. US$  2,746    7,638    19,070    21,177    73,289    123,920    Quarterly   1.73%  128,222   1.13%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

APPLE BANK

 U.S.A. US$  1,418    3,748    9,347    10,401    36,497    61,411    Quarterly   1.71%  63,480   1.11%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH

 U.S.A. US$  3,566    9,602    23,088    25,860    103,278    165,394    Quarterly   1.97%  172,789   1.26%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

DEVELOPMENT BANK OF JAPON

 U.S.A. US$  2,373    5,974    14,360    16,085    63,870    102,662    Quarterly   1.98%  107,072   1.27%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

DEUTSCHE BANK

 U.S.A. US$  4,964    12,813    36,339    39,791    96,906    190,813    Quarterly   3.35%  190,000   3.35%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

SWAP Aviones llegados

 —   US$  815    2,316    5,158    3,549    1,916    13,754    —     —    13,754   —  

Financial
leases

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  7,167    16,076    35,155    25,431    1,841    85,670    Quarterly   3.71%  85,491   3.42%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDITE AGRICOLE

 France US$  4,831    14,191    29,145    30,216    25,486    103,869    Quarterly   1.32%  103,684   1.29%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  1,603    4,164    11,481    13,237    14,995    45,480    Quarterly   6.38%  46,086   5.65%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

S.CHARTERED

 U.S.A. US$  1,828    5,638    —      —      —      7,466    Quarterly   1.31%  7,462   1.31%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  13,960    36,603    100,514    110,981    49,360    311,418    Quarterly   5.29%  314,261   4.70%

Other loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BOEING

 U.S.A. US$  563    1,829    146,190    —      —      148,582    —     1.86%  146,189   1.86%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 U.S.A. US$  3,524    10,706    29,472    14,638    —      58,340    Quarterly   2.08%  58,960   2.08%
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
     

Total

    388,977    433,176    1,260,986    921,961    2,102,470    5,107,570      5,235,826   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Interest-bearing loans due in installments to December 31, 2012, at accounting value

Class of
Liability

 

Debtor tax
No

 

Debtor

 Debtor
country
 

Creditor
Tax No

 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90 days
  More
than 90
days to
one year
  More
than one
to three
years
  More
than three
to five
years
  More
than five
years
  Total
accounting
value
  Amortization Effective
rate
 Total
nominal
value
  Nominal
rate
                ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$    % ThUS$  %

Bank
loans

 02.012.862/
0001-60
 

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE

 France US$  733    63,747    —      —      —      64,480   Quarterly 2.81%  50,322   2.81%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CITIBANK

 Brazil US$  24,735    5,684    —      —      —      30,419   At
Expiration
 4.03%  29,986   4.03%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DO BRASIL S.A.

 Brazil US$  41,444    111,073    —      —      —      152,517   At
Expiration
 5.35%  151,980   5.35%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO IBM S.A

 Brazil BRL  336    —      —      —      —      336   Semiannual 10.72%  92   10.72%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO ITAU BBA

 Brazil US$  47,205    119,711    —      —      —      166,916   At
Expiration
 5.65%  163,391   5.65%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO SAFRA

 Brazil BRL/
US$
  17,288    14,560    748    —      —      32,596   Monthly/At
Expiration
 7,69% /
4,01%
  32,446   7,69% /
4,01%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO UNIBANCO

 Brazil BRL  50    28    —      —      —      78   Monthly 8.94%  88   8.94%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO BRADESCO

 Brazil BRL  —      27,506    —      —      —      27,506   At
Expiration
 3.34%  27,484   3.34%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

NEDERLANDSCHE CREDIETVERZEKERING MAATSCHAPPIJ

 Holland US$  162    298    861    971    2,382    4,674   Monthly 0.96%  4,608   0.95%

Obligations
with the
public

 02.012.862/
0001-60
 

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK

 U.S.A. US$  12,759    9,652    6,720    306,771    810,349    1,146,251   At
Expiration
 8.60%  1,100,000   8.41%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DO BRASIL S.A

 Brazil BRL  31,061    220,210    —      —      —      251,271   Semiannual 8.96%  244,678   8.56%

Financial
leases

 02.012.862/
0001-60
 

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AFS INVESTMENT IX LLC

 U.S.A. US$  2,571    5,140    14,816    16,580    26,925    66,032   Monthly N/A  65,127   N/A
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AIR CANADA

 U.S.A. US$  3,521    9,350    —      —      —      12,871   Monthly N/A  12,750   N/A
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AIRBUS FINANCIAL SERVICES

 U.S.A. US$  3,238    8,819    25,357    27,070    22,925    87,409   Monthly 2.25%  87,033   2.25%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

AWAS

 U.S.A. US$  3,962    8,975    5,651    —      —      18,588   Monthly N/A  17,617   N/A
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$  697    1,699    4,939    5,609    11,535    24,479   Quarterly 1.50%  24,326   1.50%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 France US$  2,495    7,237    17,064    17,384    43,929    88,109   Quarterly 3.84%  87,986   3.84%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CITIBANK

 England US$  11,779    41,043    82,593    81,129    234,657    451,201   Quarterly 3.69%  451,284   3.69%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE - CIB

 U.S.A. US$  4,865    12,683    67,629    10,627    19,689    115,493   Quarterly 2.29%  114,810   2.29%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CREDIT AGRICOLE - CIB

 France US$  19,209    47,894    126,929    121,392    182,562    497,986   Quarterly/
Semiannual
 2,01% /
0,82%
  494,721   2,01% /
0,37%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

DVB BANK SE

 Germany US$  3,195    9,375    25,000    —      —      37,570   Quarterly 2.89%  37,500   2.89%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

DVB BANK SE

 U.S.A. US$  474    1,369    2,821    756    —      5,420   Monthly 2.25%  5,402   2.25%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION

 U.S.A. US$  10,536    19,967    50,876    —      —      81,379   Monthly 2.59%  81,086   2.59%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

HSBC

 France US$  1,413    3,887    10,713    11,249    42,334    69,596   Quarterly 1.70%  69,458   0.85%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

KFW IPEX-BANK

 Germany US$  4,049    11,343    32,226    23,605    26,888    98,111   Monthly/
Quarterly
 2,11% /
2,21%
  97,770   2,11% /
2,21%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

NATIXIS

 France US$  8,549    20,421    59,579    66,989    163,464    319,002   Quarterly/
Semiannual
 2,62% /
3,32%
  316,425   2,62% /
3,32%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

PK AIRFINANCE US, INC.

 U.S.A. US$  3,037    8,080    23,530    36,373    46,500    117,520   Monthly 1.96%  117,092   1.96%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

WACAPOU LEASING S.A.

 Luxembourg US$  1,192    1,417    3,370    2,847    15,018    23,844   Quarterly 2.42%  23,647   2.42%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

WELLS FARGO BANK NORTHWEST N.A.

 U.S.A. US$  1,798    5,308    3,194    —      —      10,300   Monthly 1.98%  10,271   1.98%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE MILAN BRANCH

 Italy US$  13,177    34,574    90,164    91,964    151,968    381,847   Quarterly 1.95%  380,025   1.95%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK

 U.S.A. US$  618    1,533    4,206    4,390    8,798    19,545   Quarterly 0.88%  19,431   0.08%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO DE LAGE LANDEN BRASIL S.A

 Brazil BRL  103    302    939    —      —      1,344   Monthly 7.51%  2,025   7.51%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

BANCO IBM S.A

 Brazil BRL  505    1,585    102    —      —      2,192   Monthly 10.58%  2,255   10.58%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

CISLATINA ARRENDAMENTO MERCANTIL S.A

 Brazil BRL  37    13    —      —      —      50   Monthly 5.31%  53   5.31%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

HP FINANCIAL SERVICE

 Brazil BRL  158    472    81    —      —      711   Monthly 9.08%  747   9.08%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIETE AIR FRANCE

 France EUR  602    35    1,148    —      —      1,785   Monthly 6.82%  1,572   6.82%
  

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

SOCIETE GENERALE LEASING S.A

 Brazil BRL  1,534    —      —      —      —      1,534   Monthly 0.00%  2,520   0.00%

Others
loans

 02.012.862/
0001-60
 

TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries

 Brazil 0-E 

COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE MEIOS DE PAGAMENTO

 Brazil BRL  31,882    9,143    —      —      —      41,025   Monthly 2.20%  41,025   2.20%
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
     

Total

    310,969    844,133    661,256    825,706    1,809,923    4,451,987      4,369,033   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
     

Total Consolidated

    699,946    1,277,309    1,922,242    1,747,667    3,912,393    9,559,557      9,604,859   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Interest-bearing loans installments due at December 31, 2011, at nominal value

Class of
Liability

 

Debtor tax No

 

Debtor

 Debtor
country
 

Creditor
Tax No

 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90 days
  More
than 90
days to
one
year
  More
than one
to three
years
  More
than
three to
five
years
  More
than five
years
  Total
nominal
value
  Amortization Effective
rate
  Total
accounting
value
  Nominal
rate
 
                ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$    %  ThUS$  % 

Loans to
exporters

 89.862.200-2 LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 97.036.000-K SANTANDER Chile US$  —      12,500    —      —      —      12,500   Semi-annual  2.35  12,615    2.35
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 97.004.000-5 

BANCO DE CHILE

 Chile US$  —      30,000    —      —      —      30,000   Semi-annual  1.91  30,224    1.91
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 97.006.000-6 

BCI

 Chile US$  50,000    —      —      —      —      50,000   Quarterly  1.51  50,065    1.51
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 97.032.000-8 

BBVA

 Chile US$  —      60,000    —      —      —      60,000   Annual  2.21  60,482    2.13

Bank
loans

 89.862.200-2 LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 97.030.000-7 

ESTADO

 Chile US$  —      —      44,848    —      —      44,848   Semi-annual  1.82  44,975    1.81
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  —      —      202,899    —      —      202,899   —    2.55  203,129    2.55

Guaranteed
obligations

 89.862.200-2 LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  2,584    7,961    22,779    25,172    54,697    113,193   Quarterly  5.69  111,605    5.01
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

CREDITE AGRICOLE

 France US$  19,373    57,624    64,797    33,089    7,158    182,041   Quarterly  4.05  182,876    4.05
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  11,515    35,377    100,266    90,741    116,461    354,360   Quarterly  5.18  350,084    4.61
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$  14,230    43,705    124,762    137,393    237,427    557,517   Quarterly  4.27  548,525    3.81
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

WELLS FARGO

 U.S.A. US$  3,946    12,031    33,640    35,999    103,326    188,942   Quarterly  3.64  184,969    3.53
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  10,285    31,428    88,005    94,388    273,601    497,707   Quarterly  2.94  484,801    2.61
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$  4,822    14,611    40,108    41,767    138,574    239,882   Quarterly  1.14  232,676    1.01
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

JP MORGAN

 U.S.A. US$  4,151    12,635    34,726    36,288    138,495    226,295   Quarterly  1.09  217,978    0.94
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

BTMU

 U.S.A. US$  1,886    5,742    15,876    16,702    65,657    105,863   Quarterly  1.41  102,065    1.26
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

APPLE BANK

 U.S.A. US$  643    1,957    5,440    5,740    22,761    36,541   Quarterly  1.37  35,254    1.22
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile  

SWAP Aviones llegados

  US$  969    2,770    8,887    3,792    2,021    18,439      18,439   

Financial
leases

 89.862.200-2 LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$  7,258    21,816    59,161    13,340    9,001    110,576   Quarterly  3.94  110,707    3.73
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

CREDITE AGRICOLE

 France US$  3,136    9,534    25,518    41,240    —      79,428   Quarterly  1.46  79,552    1.46
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$  2,357    4,842    19,227    —      —      26,426   Quarterly  1.85  26,467    1.82
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

S.CHARTERED

 U.S.A. US$  1,716    5,303    7,462    —      —      14,481   Quarterly  1.56  14,488    1.56
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$  3,181    9,826    27,939    30,653    14,349    85,948   Quarterly  5.22  85,315    4.68

Other
Loans

 89.862.200-3 LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile 0-E 

BOEING

 U.S.A. US$  —      —      269,965    —      —      269,965   —    1.87  272,569    1.87
  LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$  —      —      —      58,960    —      58,960   Quarterly  2.43  56,447    2.43
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  
 Total        142,052    379,662    1,196,305    665,264    1,183,528    3,566,811      3,516,307   
        

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Interest-bearing loans due in installments at December 31, 2011, at accounting values

Class of
Liability

 

Debtor tax No

 

Debtor

 Debtor
country
 

Creditor
Tax No

 

Creditor

 Creditor
country
 Currency Up to
90 days
 More
than 90
days to
one
year
 More
than one
to three
years
 More
than
three to
five
years
 More
than five
years
 Total
accounting
value
 Amortization Effective
rate
 Nominal
value
 Nominal
rate
                ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   % ThUS$ %

Loans to
exporters

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$ 115 12,500 —   —   —   12,615 Semiannual 2.35% 12,500 2.35%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.004.000-5 

BANCO DE CHILE

 Chile US$ 224 30,000 —   —   —   30,224 Semiannual 1.91% 30,000 1.91%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.006.000-6 

BCI

 Chile US$ 50,065 —   —   —   —   50,065 Quarterly 1.51% 50,000 1.51%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.032.000-8 

BBVA

 Chile US$ 482 60,000 —   —   —   60,482 Annual 2.21% 60,000 2.13%

Bank loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.030.000-7 

ESTADO

 Chile US$ 149 —   44,826 —   —   44,975 Semiannual 1.82% 44,848 1.81%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$ 230 —   202,899 —   —   203,129 —   2.55% 202,899 2.55%

Guaranteed
obligations

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$ 3,498 7,961 21,490 24,538 54,118 111,605 Quarterly 5.69% 113,193 5.01%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDITE AGRICOLE

 France US$ 20,209 57,624 64,796 33,089 7,158 182,876 Quarterly 4.05% 182,041 4.05%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$ 13,616 35,377 96,396 89,083 115,612 350,084 Quarterly 5.18% 354,360 4.61%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BNP PARIBAS

 U.S.A. US$ 16,712 43,705 118,390 134,443 235,275 548,525 Quarterly 4.27% 557,517 3.81%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

WELLS FARGO

 U.S.A. US$ 4,567 12,031 31,412 34,896 102,063 184,969 Quarterly 3.64% 188,942 3.53%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$ 12,140 31,427 81,172 90,922 269,140 484,801 Quarterly 2.94% 497,707 2.61%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 97.036.000-K 

SANTANDER

 Chile US$ 5,269 14,611 36,649 40,011 136,136 232,676 Quarterly 1.14% 239,882 1.01%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

JP MORGAN

 U.S.A. US$ 4,476 12,635 31,060 34,373 135,434 217,978 Quarterly 1.09% 226,295 0.94%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BTMU

 U.S.A. US$ 2,161 5,741 14,167 15,803 64,193 102,065 Quarterly 1.41% 105,863 1.26%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

APPLE BANK

 U.S.A. US$ 761 1,957 4,852 5,430 22,254 35,254 Quarterly 1.37% 36,541 1.22%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

SWAP Aviones llegados

 —   US$ 969 2,770 8,887 3,792 2,021 18,439 —   —   18,439 —  

Financial
leases

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

ING

 U.S.A. US$ 8,158 21,816 58,568 13,194 8,971 110,707 Quarterly 3.94% 110,576 3.73%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CREDITE AGRICOLE

 France US$ 3,260 9,534 25,518 41,240 —   79,552 Quarterly 1.46% 79,428 1.46%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

CITIBANK

 U.S.A. US$ 2,411 4,842 19,214 —   —   26,467 Quarterly 1.85% 26,426 1.82%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

S.CHARTERED

 U.S.A. US$ 1,723 5,303 7,462 —   —   14,488 Quarterly 1.56% 14,481 1.56%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

PEFCO

 U.S.A. US$ 3,874 9,826 26,985 30,325 14,305 85,315 Quarterly 5.22% 85,948 4.68%

Other
Loans

 89.862.200-2 

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile 0-E 

BOEING

 U.S.A. US$ 2,605 —   269,964 —   —   272,569 —   1.87% 269,965 1.87%
  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

 Chile —   

OTHERS

 —   US$ —   —   —   56,447 —   56,447 Quarterly 2.43% 58,960 2.43%
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 
 Total       157,674 379,660 1,164,707 647,586 1,166,680 3,516,307   3,566,811 
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

Summary of other financial non-current loans (other than bank loans, obligations with the public and financial leases)

   As of   As of 
   December 31,   December 31, 
   2012   2011 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

a) Other interest bearing loans (see note 21 a)

   57,647     2,605  

b) Derivative not recognized as a hedge (see note 21 b)

   4,477     4,907  

c) Hedge derivatives (see note 21 c)

   65,598     40,016  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total currents

   127,722     47,528  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current

    

a) Other interest bearing loans (see note 21 a)

   190,300     326,411  

b) Derivative not recognized as a hedge (see note 21 b)

   5,515     9,859  

c) Hedge derivatives (see note 21 c)

   111,040     120,304  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-currents

   306,855     456,574  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(*)b)At December 2010, the Company maintained cross currency swaps, securing the payment of ThU$ 128,056 of debt in dollars. At December 2011, these contracts were closed because the loans in Chilean pesos were paid and one of them converted to U.S. dollar.Derivatives not recognized as a hedge.

F-1-60


LOGO

b)Other financial liabilities

The detail of other financial liabilitiesDerivatives not recognized as a hedge as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, respectively, is as follows:

 

  As of   As of 
  December 31,   December 31, 
  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   2012   2011 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

Interest rate derivative not recognized as a hedge

   4,907     5,321     4,477     4,907  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current

   4,907     5,321     4,477     4,907  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current

        

Interest rate derivative not recognized as a hedge

   9,859     14,427     5,515     9,859  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current

   9,859     14,427     5,515     9,859  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other financial liabilities

   14,766     19,748     9,992     14,766  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

c)Hedging liabilitiesHedge derivatives

Hedging liabilitiesHedge derivatives as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 20102011 are as follows:

 

  As of   As of 
  December 31,   December 31, 
  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   2012   2011 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

Interest from the last date of interest rate swap

   5,027     3,826  

Fair value interest rate derivatives

   34,105     24,522  

Accrued interest from the last date of interest rate swap

   4,660     5,027  

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   37,076     34,105  

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   10,502     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   884     13,694     13,360     884  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current

   40,016     42,042     65,598     40,016  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current

        

Fair value interest rate derivatives

   120,304     90,666  

Fair value of interest rate derivatives

   104,547     120,304  

Fair value of fuel derivatives

   4,530     —    

Fair value of foreign currency derivatives

   —       7,222     1,963     —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current

   120,304     97,888     111,040     120,304  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total hedging liabilities

   160,320     139,930     176,638     160,320  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The foreign currency derivatives correspond to Cross Currency Swaps andare forward exchange contracts.

F-1-61


LOGOand collars contract.

Hedging operation

The fair values of assets/(liabilities), by type of derivative, of the contracts held as hedging instruments are presented below:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Forward starting swaps (FSS) (1)

   (19,703  (54,670

Interest rate options (2)

   73    422  

Interest rate swaps (3)

   (139,733  (64,344

Cross currency swaps (CCIRS) (4)

   —      26,703  

Fuel collars (5)

   19,016    17,782  

Fuel swap (6)

   11,599    28,032  

Currency forward (7)

   (253  (13,694
   As of  As of 
   December 31,  December 31, 
   2012  2011 
   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Forward starting swaps (FSS) (1)

   —      (19,703

Interest rate options (2)

   6    73  

Interest rate swaps (3)

   (146,283  (139,733

Fuel collars (4)

   (911  19,016  

Fuel swap (5)

   (9,000  11,599  

Currency forward (6)

   —      (253

Currency collars (7)

   (15,228  —    

 

(1)Covers the significant variations in cash flows associated with market risk implicit in the changes in the 3-month LIBOR interest rate for long-term loans incurred in the acquisition of aircraft to be produced from the future contract date. These contracts are recorded as cash flow hedges.
(2)Covers the significant variations in cash flows associated with market risk implicit in the changes in the 3-month LIBOR interest rate for long-term loans incurred in the acquisition of aircraft. These contracts are recorded as cash flow hedges.
(3)Covers the significant variations in cash flows associated with market risk implicit in the increases in the 3, 6 and 12 months LIBOR interest rates for long-term loans incurred in the acquisition of aircraft and bank loans. These contracts are recorded as cash flow hedges.
(4)Covers the significant variations in cash flows associated with market risk implicit in the changes in the TAB 180 days interest rate and the US dollar-Chilean peso exchange rate. These contracts are recorded as cash flow hedges.price of future fuel purchases.
(5)Covers the significant variations in cash flows associated with market risk implicit in the changes in the price of future fuel purchases.
(6)Covers the significant variations in cash flows associated with market risk implicit in the changes in the price of future fuel purchases.
(7)Covers investments denominated in Chilean pesos to changes in the US Dollar - Chilean Peso exchange rate, with the aim of ensuring investment in dollars.
(7)Covers TAM’s revenues recorded in another currency.

During the yearsperiods presented, the Company only maintains cash flow hedges. In the case of fuel hedges, the cash flows subject to said hedges will impact results between 1 to 9over the next 18 months from the consolidated statement of financial position date, whereaswhere as in the case of interest rate hedging, the hedges will impact results over the life of the related loans, which are valid for 12 years. With respect to interest and currency hedges, the impact on results will occur continuously throughout the life of the contract (3 years), while cash flows will occur quarterly. Finally, theThe hedges on investments will impact results continuously throughout the life of the investment (up to 3 months), while the cash flows occur at the maturity of the investment.

During the yearsperiods presented, all hedgedthere have not occurred hedging operations of future highly probable forecast transactionstransaction that have occurred.not been realized.

During the yearsperiods presented, there has been no hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the consolidated statement of income.income, for currency collars.

Since none of the coverage resulted in the recognition of a non-financial asset, no portion of the result of the derivatives recognized in equity was transferred to the initial value of such assets.

F-1-62


LOGO

The amounts recognized in comprehensive income during the yearperiod and transferred from net equity to income are as follows:

 

  For the periods ended 
  For the year ended
December 31,
   December 31, 
  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Debit (credit) recognized in comprehensive income during the year

   (40,368  (17,855   (2,510  (40,368

Debit (credit) transferred from net equity to income during the year

   62    (35,010   (26,470  62  

NOTE 21 –22 - TRADE AND OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLES

The composition of tradeTrade and other accounts payables is as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

(a) Trade and other accounts payable

   531,481     500,694  

(a) Trade and other accounts payables

   1,364,237     531,481  

(b) Accrued liabilities at the reporting date

   113,605     144,877     288,718     113,605  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total trade and other accounts payables

   645,086     645,571     1,652,955     645,086  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Trade and other accounts payables, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

a) Trade and other accounts payable as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

a)Trade and other accounts payable as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  
  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
    
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Trade creditors

   410,533     389,568     1,036,436     410,533  

Leasing obligations

   18,849     26,474  

Leasing obligation

   30,818     18,849  

Other accounts payable (*)

   102,099     84,652     296,983     102,099  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   531,481     500,694     1,364,237     531,481  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Includes agreement entitled “Plea Agreement” with the Department of Justice of the United States of America. See detail in Note 22.23.

F-1-63


LOGO

The details of Trade and other accounts payables by concept:are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Aircraft fuel

   134,088     104,404     360,618     134,088  

Boarding Fee

   80,253     72,864     203,690     80,253  

Other personnel expenses

   134,357     32,833  

Landing and other aviation fees

   41,900     43,941     121,464     41,900  

Suppliers’ technical purchases

   36,387     29,594     64,981     36,387  

Handling and ground handling

   34,743     39,915  

Other personnel expenses

   32,833     22,445  

Fleet (JOL)

   59,181     —    

Professional services and advisory

   29,870     21,275     52,903     29,870  

Marketing

   22,183     21,041     51,360     22,183  

Handling and ground handling

   49,738     34,743  

Ground services

   38,436     7,563  

Aircraft and engines leasing

   18,849     26,474     30,818     18,849  

U.S.A Department of Justice (*)

   18,387     18,387  

In-flight services

   12,929     11,761  

Services on board

   26,674     12,929  

Leases, maintenance and IT services

   24,433     13,419  

Tax recovery program (*)

   19,668     —    

U.S.A. Department of Justice (**)

   18,387     18,387  

Crew

   16,233     9,780  

Maintenance

   11,252     8,188     8,619     11,252  

Crew

   9,780     28,658  

Aviation insurance

   6,274     5,931     7,465     6,274  

Communication

   5,881     3,146  

Communications

   5,038     5,881  

Distrubution sistem

   1,389     3,137  

Others

   35,872     42,670     68,785     11,753  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total trade and other accounts payables

   531,481     500,694     1,364,237     531,481  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Fiscal Recovery Program in Brazil (REFIS), established in Law No. 11.941/09 and Provisional Measure No. 449/2009. REFIS is intended to allow the settlement of tax debts through a special mechanism to pay and refinance.
(**)Includes agreement entitled “Plea Agreement” with the Department of Justice of the United States of America. See detail in Note 22.23.

b) The liabilities accrued at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, are as follows:

   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Accrued personnel expenses

   174,147     46,034  

Accounts payable to personnel (*)

   70,625     38,391  

Aircraft and engine maintenance

   22,053     11,178  

Others accrued liabilities

   21,893     18,002  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accrued liabilities

   288,718     113,605  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

b)(*)The liabilities accrued at December 31, 2011Profits and December 31, 2010, are as follows:bonds participation (Note 26 letter b)

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Aircraft and engine maintenance

   11,178     26,133  

Accounts payable to personnel

   38,391     52,441  

Accrued personnel expenses

   46,034     40,974  

Others accrued liabilities

   18,002     25,329  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accrued liabilities

   113,605     144,877  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-1-64


LOGO

NOTE 22 –23 - OTHER PROVISIONS

The detail of otherOther provisions as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 20102011 is as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

        

Provision legal claims (1)

   7,363     753      
  

 

   

 

 

Civil contingencies

   14,776     260  

Labor contingencies

   171     331  

Tax contingencies

   6,772     6,772  

Total other provisions, current

   7,363     753     21,719     7,363  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current

        

Provision legal claims (1)

   11,710     21,204      

Provision for European Commission investigation (2)

   10,675     10,916  

Civil contingencies

   68,236     1,024  

Labor contingencies

   125,119     1,005  

Tax contingencies

   234,843     3,700  

Other

   6,066     5,981  

Provision for European Commision investigation (2)

   10,865     10,675  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other provisions, non-current

   22,385     32,120     445,129     22,385  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other provisions

   29,748     32,873  

Total other provisions (3)

   466,848     29,748  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)The amount represents a provisionsprovision for certain legal claims made against the Company by former employees, regulatory agencies and others. The charge for the provision is shown in the consolidated statement of income in Administrative expenses. It is expected that the current balance as of December 31, 20112012 will be applied during the next 12 months.
(2)Provision made for proceedings brought by the European Commission for possible breaches of free competition in the freight market.
(3)Referenced value in Note 35 Contingencies.

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Other provisions, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

The movement of provisions between January 1, 20102011 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

  Legal
claims
 European
Commission
Investigation
 Total   Legal
claims
 European
Commission
Investigation
 Total 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

   2,804    25,000    27,804  

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   21,957    10,916    32,873  

Increase in provisions

   2,872    —      2,872     12,085    —      12,085  

Acquisition through business combination

   17,174    —      17,174  

Provision used

   (681  —      (681   (3,592  —      (3,592

Reversal of unused provision

   —      (14,084  (14,084

Reversal of unused provision (*)

   (11,518  —      (11,518

Exchange difference

   (212  —      (212   141    (241  (100
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   21,957    10,916    32,873  

Closing balance as of December 31, 2011

   19,073    10,675    29,748  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

   19,073    10,675    29,748  

Increase in provisions

   5,596    —      5,596  

Provision used (**)

   (115,123  —      (115,123

Reversal of unused provision

   (449  —      (449

Additions due to business combination

   543,403    —      543,403  

Subsidiaries conversion difference

   3,192    —      3,192  

Exchange difference

   291    190    481  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

   455,983    10,865    466,848  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

   Legal
claims
  European
Commission
Investigation
  Total 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   21,957    10,916    32,873  

Increase in provisions

   12,085    —      12,085  

Provision used

   (3,592  —      (3,592

Reversal of unused provision

   (11,518  —      (11,518

Exchange difference

   141    (241  (100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   19,073    10,675    29,748  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(*)Is mainly related to the reversal of tax contingencies.
(**)The deposit judicial in guarantee, regarding the Fundo Aeroviário (FA), in the amount of MUSD $115, was done in order to suspend the enforceability of the tax credit. The company is discussing over the Tribunal the constitutionality of the requirement made by FA in a legal suit. Initially it was covered by the effects of a provisional remedy, meaning that, the company was not obligated to collect the tax while there was not a judicial decision in this regard. However, the decision taken by a judge in the first instance was publicized in an unfavorable way, revoking the provisional remedy relief. As the legal suit is still in progress (TAM appealed from this first decision), the company needed to do the deposit judicial in guarantee to suspend the enforceability of such tax credit. Finally, if the final decision is favorable to the company, the deposit already made is going to come back to TAM. On the other hand, if the tribunal confirms the first decision, such deposit will be converted in a definitive payment in favor of the Brazilian Government.

F-1-65


LOGO

European Commission Provision:

(a) This provision was established because of the investigation brought by the Directorate General for Competition of the European Commission against more than 25 cargo airlines, including Lan Cargo S.A., as part of a global investigation begun in 2006 regarding possible unfair competition on the air cargo market. This was a joint investigation by the European and U.S.A. authorities. The start of the investigation was disclosed through a significant matterEssential Matter report dated December 27, 2007. The U.S.A. portion of the global investigation concluded when Lan Cargo S.A. and its subsidiary, Aerolíneas Brasileiras S.A. (“ABSA”) signed aPlea Agreement with the U.S.A. Department of Justice, as disclosed in a significant matterEssential Matter report notice on January 21, 2009.

(b) A significant matterEssential Matter report dated November 9, 2010, reported that the General Direction of Competition had issued its decision on this case (the “decision”), under which it imposed fines totaling € 799,445,000 (seven hundred and ninety nine million four hundred and forty-five thousand Euros) for infringement of European Union regulations on free competition against eleven (11) airlines, among which are Lan AirlinesLATAM Airline Group S.A. and Lan Cargo S.A., Air Canada, Air France, KLM, British Airways, Cargolux, Cathay Pacific, Japan Airlines, Qantas Airways, SASS.A.S. and Singapore Airlines.

(c) Jointly, Lan AirlinesLATAM Airline Group S.A. and Lan Cargo S.A., have been fined in the amount of € 8,220,000 (eight million two hundred twenty thousand Euros) for said infractions, which was provisioned in the financial statements of LAN.LATAM Airline Group S.A.. This is a minor fine in comparison to the original decision, as there was a significant reduction in fine because LANLATAM Airline Group S.A. cooperated during the investigation.

(d) On January 24, 2011, Lan AirlinesLATAM Airline Group S.A. and Lan Cargo S.A. appealed the decision before the Court of Justice of the European Union. At December 31, 2011,2012, the provision reached the amount of ThUS$ 10,67510,865 (ThUS$ 10,91610,675 at December 30, 2010)31, 2011)

NOTE 23 –24 - TAX LIABILITIES

The composition of Tax liabilities is as follow:

   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

Sales tax

   47,122     5,197  

Retentions

   14,512     13,138  

Income tax

   45,413     9,750  

Others

   8,434     1,284  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   115,481     29,369  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The balances at December 31, 2012 of Tax liabilities, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 25 - OTHER CURRENT NON-FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

Other current non-financial liabilities as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 20102011 are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Current

    

Deferred revenues

   969,873     810,524     1,909,896     969,873  

Dividends payable

   85,318     125,435     4,023     85,318  

Sale leaseback

   7,867     —    

Other sundry liabilities

   2,446     3,192     20,744     2,446  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other non-financial liabilities, current

   1,057,637     939,151     1,942,530     1,057,637  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current

    

Deferred revenues

   101,259     —    

Other sundry liabilities

   62     —    
  

 

   

 

 

Total other non-financial liabilities, non-current

   101,321     —    
  

 

   

 

 

Total other non-financial liabilities

   2,043,851     1,057,637  
  

 

   

 

 

F-1-66


LOGOThe balance at December 31, 2012 of Other non-financial liabilities current and non-current, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 24 –26 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

ProvisionsLiability for employee benefits as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2010,2011, respectively, are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Pension payments

   3,559     3,164     12,594     10,556  

Termination payments

   280     1,161     240     280  

Other obligations

   9,293     5,332     5,532     2,296  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total provisions for employee benefits, non-current

   13,132     9,657  

Total liability for employee benefits

   18,366     13,132  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The balance at December 31, 2012 of Employee benefits, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

(a) The movement in payments forPension and termination indemnitiespayments and other obligations between January 1, 20102011 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

   ThUS$

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

5,555

Increase (decrease) current service provision

4,825

Benefits paid

(723

Balance as of December 31, 2010

9,657

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   9,657  

Increase (decrease) current service provision

   5,482  

Benefits paid

   (2,007
  

 

 

 

BalanceClosing balance as of December 31, 2011

   13,132  
  

 

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

13,132

Increase (decrease) current service provision

5,274

Benefits paid

(40

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

18,366

(b) The provisionliability for short-term benefits as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 20102011 respectively, is detailed below:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Profit-sharing and bonuses

   38,391     52,441  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Profit-sharing and bonuses (*)

   70,625     38,391  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Accounts payables to the personnel (Note 22 letter b)

The participation in profits and bonuses corresponds to an annual incentives plan for achievement of objectives.

(c) Employment expenses are detailed below:

 

  

For the year ended

December 31,

   

For the periods ended

December 31,

 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Salaries and wages

   764,396     587,148     476,404     1,296,101     764,396     587,148  

Short-term employee benefits

   85,681     73,335     58,530     397,824     85,681     73,335  

Termination benefits

   18,207     11,751     17,408     32,864     18,207     11,751  

Other personnel expenses

   144,219     121,030     84,329     181,084     144,219     121,030  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,012,503     793,264     636,671     1,907,873     1,012,503     793,264  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

F-1-67


LOGOFor the period ended at December 31, 2012 the personnel expenses, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 25 – NON-CURRENT27 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, NON-CURRENT

Non-current accounts payable as of December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 20102011 are as follows:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Fleet financing (JOL)

   271,965     314,372     140,769     271,965  

Other accounts payable (*)

   36,000     54,000  

Tax recovery program (*)

   207,089     —    

Other accounts payable (**)

   21,594     36,000  

Aircraft and engine maintenance

   38,540     47,607     335,834     38,540  

Provision for vacations and bonuses

   7,982     7,949     9,954     7,982  

Other sundry liabilities

   443     1,753     15,995     443  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   354,930     425,681  

Total accounts payable, non-current

   731,235     354,930  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Fiscal Recovery Program in Brazil (REFIS), established in Law No. 11.941/09 and Provisional Measure No. 449/2009. REFIS is intended to allow the settlement of tax debts through a special mechanism to pay and refinance.
(**)Agreement entitled “Plea Agreement” with the Department of Justice of United States of America; its short-term part is in tradeTrade and other payables.payable. See details in Note 22.23.

F-1-68


LOGOThe balance at December 31, 2012 of accounts payable non-current, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 26 –28 - EQUITY

 

(a)Capital

The capital of the Company is managed and composed in the following form:

The Company’s objective is to maintain an appropriate level of capitalization that enables it to ensure access to the financial markets for carrying out its medium and long-term objectives, optimizing the return for its shareholders and maintaining a solid financial position.

The Capital of the Company is managed and composed in the following form:

The capital of the Company at December 31, 20112012 amounts to ThUS$ 473,907,1,501,018 divided into 340,326,431479,098,052 common stock of a same series (ThUS$ 453,444473,907, divided into 338,790,909340,326,431 shares as of December 31, 2010)2011), no par value. There are no special series of shares and no privileges. The form of its stock certificates and their issuance, exchange, disablement, loss, replacement and other similar circumstances, as well as the transfer of the shares, is governed by the provisions of Corporations Law and its regulations.

 

(b)Subscribed and paid shares

AtAs of December 31, 2011,2012, the total number of shares authorized is 488,355,882488,355,791 shares no par value, according to the capital increase approved at the ExtraordinaryExtraodinary Shareholders’ Meeting of December 21, 2011 by 147,355,882 ordinary shares no par value. Of this increase, 142,555,882 shares, will bewas allocated to the proposed merger with companies Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A.; and 4,800,000 shares will be allocated to compensation plans for employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. At the end of December 2012, 343,978,986 are fully paid and 135,119,066 were subjected to exchange for shares of the Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A.

As reported by Essential Matter dated June 28, 2012, the Board agreed to submit to the approval of shareholders of the Company that the remaining 7,436,816 shares that were not used in the exchange, not be used for the purpose of creating and implementing a compensation plan for employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, as provided in Article 24 of the Corporations Law, but instead preferably intended to be offered to shareholders of LATAM Airlines Group S.A., according to article 25 of the Corporation Law.

According to the information through Essential Matter dated August 3, 2012, to this year,date, the Board agreed to call Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting to discuss, among other matters, that the referred 7,436,816 shares were intended to be offered preferentially to shareholders of the Company and the balance not subscribed, was offered and placed on the market in general. The aforementioned Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on September 4, 2012, agreed, among other matters, the approval of the remaining 7,436,816 shares of total 142,555,882 shares issued under the authorization of the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting dated December 21, 2011, and were not to be exchanged for shares of the Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A., were intended to be offered preferably between the LATAM shareholders under Article 25 of the Corporations Law and that the unsubscribed balance, would be offered and placed on the market in general.

The re-destination and placement of those shares was approved by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, dated December 11, 2012. On December 20, 2012, the Board of Directors agreed to start, from December 21, 2012, the period of preferred option of those shares, proceeded to fix the price of placing them, which was reported to the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance by Essential Matter on the same date. At December 31, 2012, 2,988,885 of the said 7,436,816 shares had been placed of which 2,979,077 were paid. The Information on the result of this placement is available in Note 40 on Subsequent Events.

At December 31, 2011, of the total shares subscribed, before the capital increase mentioned, 340,326,431 shares have been fully paid (includes 7,000 shares paid on December 30, December 2011 and registered in the Register of Shareholders in January 2012), leaving 673,569 shares reserved for issuance under option contracts. Between

The following table shows the movement of the authorized and fully paid shares described above between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011, options for 1,535,522 shares have been exercised.

At December 31, 2010, of the total subscribed shares 338,790,909 were fully paid, with 2,209,091 stock option contracts reserved for issuance.2012

 

(c)Other equity interests
Movement of authorized shares

No of

shares

Authorized shares as of January 1, 2011

341,000,000

Increase Capital as of December 21, 2011

Issued shares merger Companies Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A.

142,555,882

Compensation plans for employees

4,800,000

Authorized shares as of December 31, 2011

488,355,882

Authorized shares as of January 1, 2012

488,355,882

Increase capital option closing year 2007 options over canceled shares

(91

Authorized shares as of December 31, 2012

488,355,791

Movement fully paid shares (*)  

No of

shares

   

Amount

ThUS$

 

Paid shares as of January 1, 2011

   338,790,909     453,444  

Exercise stock options increase capital 2007

   1,535,522     23,135  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Paid shares as of December 31, 2011

   340,326,431     476,579  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Paid shares as of January 1, 2012

   340,326,431     476,579  

Exercise stock options increase capital 2007

   673,478     10,226  

Exchange of shares for merger Companies Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A.

   135,119,066     951,409  

Placement of the remaining preferred shares issued for merger with Companies Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A.

   2,979,077     68,986  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Paid shares as of December 31, 2012 (*)

   479,098,052     1,507,200  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Amounts reported represent only those arising from the payment of the outstanding shares, does not consider the capitalization costs for issuance and placement of shares by ThUS$ (3,510) at December 31, 2012 and ThUS$ (2,672) to December 31, 2011.

The movement of other equity intereststock options over shares related to the capital increase in 2007 is detailed in Note 38.

(c)Treasury stock

At December 31, 2012, of the total number of shares subscribed and paid, the Company has acquired 7,401 shares, from the shareholders who exercised the right to retirement, for an amount of ThUS$ 203.

(d)Other sundry reserves

The movement of Other sundry reserves between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

   Stock
option
plans
  Other
reserves
   Total 
   ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

   2,477    13     2,490  

Stock option plans

   3,523    —       3,523  

Deferred tax

   (599  —       (599

Legal reserves

   —      49     49  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   5,401    62     5,463  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-1-69


LOGO

  Stock
option
plans
 Other
reserves
 Total   Stock
option
plans
 Other
reserves
 Total 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

   2,477    13    2,490  

Stock option plans

   3,523    —      3,523  

Deferred tax

   (599  —      (599

Legal reserves

   —      49    49  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010

   5,401    62    5,463  
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   5,401    62    5,463     5,401    62    5,463  

Stock option plans

   2,084    —      2,084     2,084    —      2,084  

Deferred tax

   (355  —      (355   (355  —      (355

Transactions with minority interests

   —      (1,801  (1,801

Capitalization share issuance and placement costs (1)

   —      2,672    2,672  

Transactions with non-controlling interest

   —      (1,801  (1,801

Capitalization share issuance and placement cost (1)

   —      2,672    2,672  

Legal reserves

   —      429    429     —      429    429  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   7,130    1,362    8,492  

Closing balance as of December 31, 2011

   7,130    1,362    8,492  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

   7,130    1,362    8,492  

Stock option plan

   (1,299  —      (1,299

Deferred tax

   (257  —      (257

Transactions with non-controlling interest

   —      (1,604  (1,604

Cost of issuance and placement of shares (2)

   —      (3,510  (3,510

Capitalization share issuance and placement cost (2)

   —      3,510    3,510  

Higher value for TAM S.A. share exchange

   —      2,665,692    2,665,692  

Legal reserves

   —      1,232    1,232  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

   5,574    2,666,682    2,672,256  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Capitalization share issuance and placement costs caused by the capital increase carried out in 2007, as set out extraordinary share holders meetingExtraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on December 21, 2011.

(c.1)(2)The costs of issuance and placement of shares recognized in reserves during the first half of 2012 were capitalized during the month of September 2012, according to the minutes of the Extraordinary Meeting of Shareholders held on September 4, 2012.

(d.1)Reserves for stock option plans

These reserves are related to the share-based payments“Share-based payments” explained in Note 36.38.

 

(c.2)(d.2)Other sundry reserves

The balance of other sundryOther reserves comprises the following:

 

   As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Reserve for the adjustment of the value of fixed assets (1)

   2,620    2,620  

Transactions with minority interests (2)

   (1,801  —    

Share issuance and placement costs (3)

   —      (2,672

Others

   543    114  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,362    62  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Option
plans
  Other
reserves
   Total 
   ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

   2,477    13     2,490  

Stock option plans

   3,523    —       3,523  

Deferred tax

   (599  —       (599

Legal reserves

   —      49     49  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010

   5,401    62     5,463  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   5,401    62     5,463  

Stock option plans

   2,084    —       2,084  

 

(1)Corresponds to the difference in the shares value of TAM S.A. acquired (under subscriptions) by Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A. (under the Exchange Offer), as stipulated in the Declaration of Posting of Merger by Absorption and the fair value of these exchange shares of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. at June 22, 2012.
(2)Corresponds to the technical revaluation of fixed assets authorized by the Superintendence of Securities and Insurance in 1979, in Circular No. 1,529. The revaluation was optional and could be taken only once, the reserve is not distributable and can only be capitalized.
(2)(3)Corresponds to the loss generated by the participation of Lan Pax Group S.A., in the capital increase for Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.
(3)As established in Circular 1,736 of by ThUS$ (621) at December 31, 2012 (ThUS$ (1,801) at December 31, 2011) and the Superintendence of Securities and Insurance, the next extraordinary shareholders meeting to be heldloss generated by the parent Company should approve the share issuance and placement costs account to be deducted fromparticipation of Lan Cargo S.A. Investment in the capital paid.increase carried out by Línea Aérea Carguera de Colombia S.A. by ThUS$ (983) at December 31, 2012.

F-1-70


LOGO

(d)(e)Other reservesReserves with effect in other comprehensive income.

The movement of Reserves with effect in other reservescomprehensive income between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

  Currency
translation
reserve
 Cash flow
hedging
reserve
 Total   Currency
translation
reserve
 Cash flow
hedging
reserve
 Total 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$   ThUS$ ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

   (4,924  (92,230  (97,154   (4,924  (92,230  (97,154

Derivatives valuation gains (losses)

   —      (17,855  (17,855   —      (17,855  (17,855

Deferred tax

   (137  3,035    2,898     (137  3,035    2,898  

Currency translation differences

   804    —      804  

Conversion difference subsidiaries

   804    —      804  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   (4,257  (107,050  (111,307

Closing balance as of December 31, 2010

   (4,257  (107,050  (111,307
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   (4,257  (107,050  (111,307   (4,257  (107,050  (111,307

Derivatives valuation gains (losses)

   —      (40,368  (40,368   —      (40,368  (40,368

Deferred tax

   1,855    6,862    8,717     1,855    6,862    8,717  

Currency translation differences

   (10,915  —      (10,915

Conversion difference subsidiaries

   (10,915  —      (10,915
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   (13,317  (140,556  (153,873

Closing balance as of December 31, 2011

   (13,317  (140,556  (153,873
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

   (13,317  (140,556  (153,873

Derivatives valuation gains (losses)

   —      5,003    5,003  

Deferred tax

   (2,727  (5,177  (7,904

Conversion difference subsidiaries

   19,618    —      19,618  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

   3,574    (140,730  (137,156
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(d.1)(e.1)Currency translation reserve

These originate from exchange differences arising from the translation of any investment in foreign entities (or Chilean investment with a functional currency different to that of the parent), and from loans and other instruments in foreign currency designated as hedges for such investments. When the investment (all or part) is sold or disposed and loss of control occurs, these reserves are shown in the consolidated statement of income as part of the loss or gain on the sale or disposal. If the sale does not involve loss of control, these reserves are transferred to non-controlling interests.

 

(d.2)(e.2)Cash flow hedging reserve

These originate from the fair value valuation at the end of each yearperiod of the outstanding derivative contracts that have been defined as cash flow hedges. When these contracts expire, these reserves should be adjusted and the corresponding results recognized.

(e)(f)Retained earnings

The movement of retainedRetained earnings between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 20112012 is as follows:

 

   ThUS$ 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2010

   740,047  

Result for the yearperiod

   419,702  

Other decreasesincreases (decreases)

   (129

Dividends

   (210,406
  

 

 

 

BalanceClosing balance as of December 31, 2010

   949,214  
  

 

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2011

   949,214  

Result for the yearperiod

   320,197  

Other decreasesincreases (decreases)

   (632

Dividends

   (151,981
  

 

 

 

BalanceClosing balance as of December 31, 2011

   1,116,798  
  

 

 

 

Opening balance as of January 1, 2012

1,116,798

Result for the period

10,956

Other increases (decreases)

163

Dividends

(21,749

Closing balance as of December 31, 2012

1,106,168

F-1-71


LOGO

 

(f)(g)Dividends per share

As of December 31, 2012

Description

  Final
dividend
2011
   Mandatory  minimum
dividend

2012
 

Date of dividend

   04-26-2012     12-31-2012  

Amount of the dividend (ThUS$)

   18,462     3,287  

Number of shares among which the dividend is distributed

   340,999,909     479,098,052  

Dividend per share (US$)

   0.05414     0.00686  

As of December 31, 2011

 

  Final
dividend
2010
   Interim
dividend
2011
   Interim
dividend
2011
 

Description

        Final
dividend
2010
   Interim
dividend

2011
   Interim
dividend

2011
 

Date of dividend

   4/29/2011     8/30/2011     12/20/2011     04-29-2011     08-30-2011     12-20-2011  

Amount of the dividend (ThUS$)

   10,386     56,595     85,000     10,386     56,595     85,000  

Number of shares among which the dividend is distributed

   339,310,509     339,358,209     340,164,105     339,310,509     339,358,209     340,164,105  

Dividend per share (US$)

   0.03061     0.16677     0.24988     0.03061     0.16677     0.24988  

As of December 31, 2010

      
  Final
dividend
2009
   Interim
dividend
2010
   Interim
dividend
2010
 

Description

      

Date of dividend

   4/29/2010     7/27/2010     12/23/2010  

Amount of the dividend (ThUS$)

   10,940     74,466     125,000  

Number of shares among which the dividend is distributed

   338,790,909     338,790,909     338,790,909  

Dividend per share (US$)

   0.03229     0.21980     0.36896  

As of December 31, 2010

Description

  Final
dividend
2009
   Interim
dividend

2010
   Interim
dividend

2010
 

Date of dividend

   29-04-2010     27-07-2010     23-12-2010  

Amount of the dividend (ThUS$)

   10,940     74,466     125,000  

Number of shares among which the dividend is distributed

   338,790,909     338,790,909     338,790,909  

Dividend per share (US$)

   0.03229     0.21980     0.36896  

The Company’s dividend policy is that dividends distributed will be equal to the minimum required by law, i.e. 30% of the net income according to current regulations. This policy does not preclude the Company from distributing dividends in excess of this obligatory minimum, based on the events and circumstances that may occur during the course of the year.

At December 31, 2011 interim2012, dividends were declaredare provisioned for 44.2%a minimum mandatory dividend corresponding to 30% of earnings for this year.the value of Company. This amount is in the category Other non-financial liabilities, current.

NOTE 27 –29 - REVENUE

The detail of revenues is as follows:

 

  

For the year ended

December 31,

   

For the periods ended

December 31,

 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Passengers

   4,008,910     3,109,797     2,623,608     7,978,664     4,008,910     3,109,797  

Cargo

   1,576,530     1,280,705     895,554     1,743,525     1,576,530     1,280,705  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   5,585,440     4,390,502     3,519,162     9,722,189     5,585,440     4,390,502  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

F-1-72


LOGOFor the period ended at December 31, 2012 the Revenue, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 28 –30 - COSTS AND EXPENSES BY NATURE

 

a)Costs and operating expenses

The main operating costs and administrative expenses are detailed below:

 

  

For the year ended

December 31,

   

For the periods ended

December 31,

 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other rentals and landing fees

   671,614     595,214     490,921     1,052,594     671,614     595,214  

Aircraft fuel

   1,750,052     1,161,927     959,608     3,434,569     1,750,052     1,161,927  

Commissions

   209,255     173,397     143,900  

Comissions

   308,941     209,255     173,397  

Other operating expenses

   646,051     506,730     387,106     1,288,151     646,051     506,730  

Aircraft rentals

   174,197     98,588     83,712     313,038     174,197     98,588  

Aircraft maintenance

   182,358     120,642     121,037     297,618     182,358     120,642  

Passenger services

   136,049     114,221     92,796     239,848     136,049     114,221  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   3,769,576     2,770,719     2,279,080     6,934,759     3,769,576     2,770,719  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

b)Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization are detailed below:

 

  

For the year ended

December 31,

   

For the periods ended

December 31,

 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Depreciation (*)

   386,644     327,136     295,894     753,747     386,644     327,136  

Amortization

   9,831     9,355     8,168     31,140     9,831     9,355  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   396,475     336,491     304,062     784,887     396,475     336,491  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(*)Includes the depreciation of property,Property, plant and equipment and the maintenance cost of aircraft held under operating leases.

 

c)Personnel expenses

The costs for personnel expenses are disclosed in provisionsLiability for employee benefits (See Note 24)26).

d)Financial costs

The detail of financial costs is as follows:

 

   

For the year ended

December 31,

 
   2011   2010   2009 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Bank loan interest

   99,093     117,405     113,827  

Financial leases

   10,617     5,880     4,406  

Other financial instruments

   29,367     31,994     34,876  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   139,077     155,279     153,109  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-1-73


LOGO

   For the periods ended 
   December 31, 
   2012   2011   2010 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Bank loan interest

   213,332     109,168     117,405  

Financial leases

   46,893     12,265     5,880  

Other financial instruments

   34,373     17,644     31,994  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   294,598     139,077     155,279  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Costs and expenses by nature presented in this note plus the Employee expenses disclosed in Note 26, are equivalent to the sum of cost of sales, distribution costs, administrative expenses, other expenses and financing costs presented in the consolidated statement of income by function.

For the period ended at December 31, 2012 the Cost and expenses by nature, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 29 –31 - GAINS (LOSSES) ON THE SALE OF NON-CURRENT ASSETS NOT CLASSIFIED AS HELD FOR SALE

The gains (losses) on sales of non-current assets not classified as Heldheld for Salesale as of December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 are as follows:

 

      For the year ended
December 31,
     
   2011  2010   2009 
   ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Property, plant and equipment

   (172  1,413     4,278  

Investments in companies, associates and joint businesses

   —      —       (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   (172  1,413     4,276  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The gain (loss) on sales for the year is presented in other operating income by function and cost of sales.
   For the periods ended 
   December 31, 
   2012  2011  2010 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Property, plant and equipment

   (2,836  (172  1,413  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (2,836  (172  1,413  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 30 –32 - OTHER INCOME, BY FUNCTION

Other income by function is as follows:

 

  For the periods ended 
      

For the year ended

December 31,

       December 31, 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Duty free

   16,874     11,983     9,593     17,463     16,874     11,983  

Aircraft leasing

   12,701     13,130     20,696     28,863     12,701     13,130  

Logistics and courier

   10,958     36,778     33,132     —       10,958     36,778  

Customs and warehousing

   24,677     24,673     18,682     24,537     24,677     24,673  

Tours

   43,952     28,216     31,088     74,226     43,952     28,216  

Other miscellaneous income

   23,642     18,046     23,160     75,067     23,642     18,046  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   132,804     132,826     136,351     220,156     132,804     132,826  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

F-1-74


LOGOFor the period ended at December 31, 2012 of Other income, by function, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 31 –33 - FOREIGN CURRENCY AND EXHANGEEXCHANGE RATE DIFFERENCES

The functional currency of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. is the US dollar, also it has subsidiaries whose functional currency is different to the US dollar, such as the Chilean peso, Argentine peso, Colombian peso and Brazilian real, the latter due to Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

The functional currency is defined primarily as the currency of the primary economic environment in which an entity operates in each state and all other currencies are defined as foreign currency.

Considering the above, the balances by currency mentioned in this note correspond to the sum of foreign currency of each of the entities that make LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries.

It was also necessary to apply the above definition to the December 2011 amounts, for comparative purposes.

 

a)Foreign currency

The foreign currency detail of balances of monetary items in current and non-current assets is as follows:

 

  As of   As of 

Current assets

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   December 31,   December 31, 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   2012   2011 
  ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Cash and cash equivalents

   216,094     436,840     337,223     216,747  

Chilean peso

   148,274     368,360  

Euro

   5,688     7,844  

Argentine peso

   20,020     11,230     68,705     12,956  

Brazilian real

   6,616     4,759     3,308     6,616  

Chilean peso

   40,091     148,148  

Colombian peso

   7,668     10,231     671     864  

Euro

   15,502     5,688  

U.S. dollar

   94,035     14,647  

Strong bolivar

   51,346     21,589  

Other currency

   27,828     34,416     63,565     6,239  

Other current financial assets

   4,352     6,726  

Brazilian real

   1,127     4,740  

Colombian peso

   2,009     947  

Other currency

   1,216     1,039  

Other current non-financial assets

   3,881     2,692  

Chilean peso

   1,561     1,247  

Other financial assets

   30,936     17,214  

Argentine peso

   1,781     419     —       1  

Brazilian real

   52     96     2,167     1,127  

Chilean peso

   550     499  

Colombian peso

   117     299     2,147     18  

Euro

   8     291  

U.S. dollar

   18,020     14,948  

Strong bolivar

   601     5  

Other currency

   370     631     7,443     325  

Trade and other current accounts receivable

   182,434     119,780  

Chilean peso

   63,818     28,606  

Euro

   8,266     8,429  

Argentine peso

   24,879     6,702  

Brazilian real

   35,467     31,329  

Australian dollar

   5,567     5,588  

Colombian peso

   34,583     27,156  

Other currency

   9,854     11,970  

Current accounts receivable from related entities

   809     21  

Chilean peso

   809     21  

Current tax assets

   67,668     62,455  

Chilean peso

   15,817     16,805  

Argentine peso

   20,236     14,477  

Brazilian real

   8,475     6,735  

Mexican peso

   18,457     17,477  

Colombian peso

   2,658     2,615  

Other currency

   2,025     4,346  

Total current assets

   475,238     628,514  

Chilean peso

   230,279     415,039  

Euro

   13,954     16,273  

Argentine peso

   66,916     32,828  

Brazilian real

   51,737     47,659  

Mexican peso

   18,457     17,477  

Australian dollar

   5,567     5,588  

Colombian peso

   47,035     41,248  

Other currency

   41,293     52,402  

F-1-75
   As of   As of 

Current assets

  December 31,   December 31, 
   2012   2011 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Trade and other accounts receivable

   503,601     160,882  

Argentine peso

   9,441     8,450  

Brazilian real

   33,313     35,467  

Chilean peso

   130,736     61,839  

Colombian peso

   3,153     28,150  

Euro

   67,287     8,266  

U.S. dollar

   166,758     3,289  

Strong bolivar

   2,759     1,247  

Other currency

   90,154     14,174  

Accounts receivable from related entities

   14,565     838  

Chilean peso

   14,565     809  

U.S. dollar

   —       29  

Tax assets

   64,553     45,524  

Argentine peso

   3,740     1,792  

Brazilian real

   10,753     8,475  

Chilean peso

   24,764     14,651  

Colombian peso

   924     124  

Euro

   4,618     522  

U.S. dollar

   1,649     —    

Strong bolivar

   351     —    

Other currency

   17,754     19,960  

Total assets

   950,878     441,205  

Argentine peso

   81,886     23,199  

Brazilian real

   49,541     51,685  

Chilean peso

   210,706     225,946  

Colombian peso

   6,895     29,156  

Euro

   87,415     14,767  

U.S. Dollar

   280,462     32,913  

Strong bolivar

   55,057     22,841  

Other currency

   178,916     40,698  


LOGO

   As of   As of 

Non-current assets

  December 31,   December 31, 
   2012   2011 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other financial assets

   31,329     4,388  

Argentine peso

   8     1  

Brazilian real

   3,505     1,939  

Chilean peso

   98     89  

Colombian peso

   524     2,166  

Euro

   7,817     —    

U.S. dollar

   15,895     140  

Other currency

   3,482     53  

Accounts receivable

   14,812     7,482  

Chilean peso

   9,564     7,422  

U.S. dollar

   5,000     —    

Other currency

   248     60  

Tax assets, long term portion

   22,105     17,951  

Argentine peso

   41     17,951  

U.S. dollar

   1     —    

Other currency

   22,063     —    

Deferred tax assets

   4,203     —    

Other currency

   4,203     —    

Total assets

   72,449     29,821  

Argentine peso

   49     17,952  

Brazilian real

   3,505     1,939  

Chilean peso

   9,662     7,511  

Colombian peso

   524     2,166  

Euro

   7,817     —    

U.S. dollar

   20,896     140  

Other currency

   29,996     113  

Non-current assets

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other non-current financial assets

   4,276     4,504  

Brazilian real

   1,939     1,991  

Colombian peso

  ��2,166     1,970  

Other currency

   171     543  

Other non-current non-financial assets

   18,081     1,681  

Argentine peso

   17,951     1,681  

Colombian peso

   130     —    

Non-current accounts receivable

   7,482     7,874  

Chilean peso

   7,422     7,864  

Other currency

   60     10  

Investment recorded using the method of participation

   990     593  

Chilean peso

   990     593  

Goodwill

   100,529     94,747  

Argentine peso

   487     523  

Colombian peso

   100,042     94,224  

Deferred tax assets

   50,272     28,943  

Colombian peso

   45,173     28,943  

Other currency

   5,099     —    

Total non-current assets

   181,630     138,342  

Chilean peso

   8,412     8,457  

Argentine peso

   18,438     2,204  

Brazilian real

   1,939     1,991  

Colombian peso

   147,511     125,137  

Other currency

   5,330     553  

F-1-76


LOGO

The foreign currency detail of balances of monetary items in current liabilities and non-current liabilities is as follows:

 

  Up to 90 days   91 days to 1 year 
  Up to 90 days   91 days to 1 year   As of   As of   As of   As of 

Current liabilities

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31, 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   2012   2011   2012   2011 

Other current financial liabilities

   —       46,043     —       112,672  
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other financial liabilities

   241,473     —       589,105     —    

U.S. dollar

   240,871     —       589,070     —    

Euro

   602     —       35     —    

Trade and other accounts payables

   825,391     292,133     19,850     12,272  

Argentine peso

   21,398     14,968     —       —    

Brazilian real

   38,506     32,898     8     9  

Chilean peso

   —       41,638     —       112,672     72,643     74,576     11,938     10,062  

Colombian peso

   —       4,405     —       —       29,268     26,594     —       —    

Euro

   38,540     10,921     1,695     697  

U.S. dollar

   208,858     44,115     6,157     1,431  

Strong bolivar

   2,710     1,269     —       22  

Other currency

   413,468     86,792     52     51  

Trade and other accounts payables

   298,551     240,419     21,082     14,012  

Accounts payable to related entities

   14     367     —       —    

Chilean peso

   77,141     52,779     10,284     9,559     14     118     —       —    

Euro

   10,921     9,438     697     14  

U.S. dollar

   —       249     —       —    

Tax liabilities

   12,840     7,520     —       1,012  

Argentine peso

   35,542     43,214     —       3,725     2,125     305     —       —    

Brazilian real

   32,898     22,633     9     —       2,925     1,724     —       334  

Chilean peso

   3,019     3,238     —       678  

Colombian peso

   53,988     44,725     10,019     —       200     —       —       —    

Euro

   3,261     468     —       —    

U.S. dollar

   325     593     —       —    

Other currency

   88,061     67,630     73     714     985     1,192     —       —    

Current accounts payable from related

   118     74     —       —    

Chilean peso

   118     74     —       —    

Current tax liabilities

   10,168     9,700     4,384     2,621  

Chilean peso

   3,678     3,007     748     1,064  

Argentine peso

   2,164     240     2,303     1,202  

Brazilian real

   1,724     1,994     334     —    

Colombian peso

   942     3,125     999     17  

Other currency

   1,660     1,334     —       338  

Other current non-financial liabilities

   32,393     27,729     2,527     1,071  

Brazilian real

   —       —       235     1,041  

Colombian peso

   32,036     27,477     1,789     —    

Other currency

   357     252     503     30  

Total current liabilities

   341,230     323,965     27,993     130,376  

Chilean peso

   80,937     97,498     11,032     123,295  

Euro

   10,921     9,438     697     14  

Argentine peso

   37,706     43,454     2,303     4,927  

Brazilian real

   34,622     24,627     578     1,041  

Colombian peso

   86,966     79,732     12,807     17  

Other currency

   90,078     69,216     576     1,082  

F-1-77
   Up to 90 days   91 days to 1 year 
   As of   As of   As of   As of 

Current liabilities

  December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31, 
   2012   2011   2012   2011 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other non-financial liabilities

   48,935     51,884     16     3,827  

Brazilian real

   98     —       10     235  

Chilean peso

   120     114     —       361  

Colombian peso

   3,082     16,135     —       —    

U.S. dollar

   44,056     35,392     —       3,231  

Strong bolivar

   1,211     239     —       —    

Other currency

   368     4     6     —    

Total liabilities

   1,128,653     351,904     608,971     17,111  

Argentine peso

   23,523     15,273     —       —    

Brazilian real

   41,529     34,622     18     578  

Chilean peso

   75,796     78,046     11,938     11,101  

Colombian peso

   32,550     42,729     —       —    

Euro

   42,403     11,389     1,730     697  

U.S. dollar

   494,110     80,349     595,227     4,662  

Strong bolivar

   3,921     1,508     —       22  

Other currency

   414,821     87,988     58     51  


LOGO

   More than 1 to 3 years   More than 3 to 5 years   More than 5 years 
   As of   As of   As of   As of   As of   As of 

Non-current liabilities

  December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31, 
   2012   2011   2012   2011   2012   2011 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Other financial liabilities

   623,828     —       859,526     —       1,811,660     —    

U.S. dollar

   622,680     —       859,526     —       1,811,660     —    

Euro

   1,148     —       —       —       —       —    

Accounts payable

   313,215     7,530     138     76     —       10  

Chilean peso

   8,286     6,549     138     76     —       10  

U.S. dollar

   303,631     —       —       —       —       —    

Other currency

   1,298     981     —       —       —       —    

Other provisions

   16,187     11,821     —       —       —       —    

Argentine peso

   664     651     —       —       —       —    

Brazillian real

   808     466     —       —       —       —    

Chilean peso

   36     29     —       —       —       —    

Euro

   10,865     10,675     —       —       —       —    

Other currency

   3,814     —       —       —       —       —    

Total non-current liabilities

   953,230     19,351     859,664     76     1,811,660     10  

Argentine peso

   664     651     —       —       —       —    

Brazilian real

   808     466     —       —       —       —    

Chilean peso

   8,322     6,578     138     76     —       10  

Euro

   12,013     10,675     —       —       —       —    

U.S. dollar

   926,311     —       859,526     —       1,811,660     —    

Other currency

   5,112     981     —       —       —       —    

  More than 1 to 3 years  More than 3 to 5 years  More than 5 years 

Non-current liabilities

 As of
December 31,

2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
  As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
  As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
 
  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Other non-current financial liabilities

  —      61,477    —      —      —      —    

Chilean peso

  —      61,477    —      —      —      —    

Non-current accounts payable

  7,665    7,696    76    71    10    5  

Chilean peso

  6,684    6,721    76    71    10    5  

Other currency

  981    975    —      —      —      —    

Other long-term provisions

  21,175    —      —      1,707    —      —    

Brazilian real

  466    —      —      1,401    —      —    

Colombian peso

  5,728    —      —      153    —      —    

Other currency

  14,981    —      —      153    —      —    

Non-current provisions for employee benefits

  5,528    3,153    —      —      —      698  

Argentine peso

  1,097    —      —      —      —      698  

Colombian peso

  4,431    3,153    —      —      —      —    

Total non-current liabilities

  34,368    72,326    76    3,026    10    703  

Chilean peso

  6,684    68,198    76    71    10    5  

Argentine peso

  1,097    —      —      —      —      698  

Brazilian real

  466    —      —      1,401    —      —    

Colombian peso

  10,159    3,153    —      1,401    —      —    

Other currency

  15,962    975    —      153    —      —    

  As of As of 

General summary of foreign currency:

  As of
December 31,
2011
 As of
December 31,
2010
   December 31, December 31, 
  ThUS$ ThUS$   2012 2011 
  ThUS$ ThUS$ 

Total assets

   656,868    766,856     1,023,327    471,026  

Chilean peso

   238,691    423,496  

Euro

   13,954    16,273  

Argentine peso

   85,354    35,032     81,935    41,151  

Brazilian real

   53,676    49,650     53,046    53,624  

Mexican peso

   18,457    17,477  

Australian dollar

   5,567    5,588  

Chilean peso

   220,368    233,457  

Colombian peso

   194,546    166,385     7,419    31,322  

Euro

   95,232    14,767  

U.S. dollar

   301,358    33,053  

Strong bolivar

   55,057    22,841  

Other currency

   46,623    52,955     208,912    40,811  

Total liabilities

   403,677    528,995     5,362,178    388,452  

Chilean peso

   98,739    289,067  

Euro

   11,618    9,452  

Argentine peso

   41,106    49,079     24,187    15,924  

Brazilian real

   35,666    27,069     42,355    35,666  

Chilean peso

   96,194    95,811  

Colombian peso

   109,932    82,902     32,550    42,729  

Euro

   56,146    22,761  

U.S. dollar

   4,686,834    85,011  

Strong bolivar

   3,921    1,530  

Other currency

   106,616    71,426     419,991    89,020  

Net position

   253,191    237,861     

Chilean peso

   139,952    134,429  

Euro

   2,336    6,821  

Argentine peso

   44,248    (14,047   57,748    25,227  

Brazilian real

   18,010    22,581     10,691    17,958  

Mexican peso

   18,457    17,477  

Australian dollar

   5,567    5,588  

Chilean peso

   124,174    137,646  

Colombian peso

   84,614    83,483     (25,131  (11,407

Euro

   39,086    (7,994

U.S. dollar

   (4,385,476  (51,958

Strong bolivar

   51,136    21,311  

Other currency

   (59,993  (18,471   (211,079  (48,209

F-1-78


LOGO

b)Exchange differences

Exchange rate differences recognized in results, other than those relating tothe income statement, except for financial instruments measured at fair value through profit andor loss accumulated at December 31, 2011 and 2010 generated a loss of ThUS$ 256 and a gain of ThUS$ 13,792, respectively.

Exchange rate differences shown in equity as translation reserves for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, generated a gain of ThUS$ 66,685 and 2010 represented a loss of ThUS$ 10,864256, respectively.

Exchange differences recognized in equity as reserves for currency translation differences for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, represented a gain of ThUS$ 708,18,692 and a loss of ThUS$ 10,864, respectively.

The following shows the current exchange rates for the USU.S. dollar, aton the end of each period:dates indicated:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of   As of 

Chilean peso

   519.20     468.01  
  December 31,   December 31, 
  2012   2011 

Argentine peso

   4.30     3.97     4.91     4.30  

Brazilian real

   1.87     1.66     2.04     1.87  

Chilean peso

   479.96     519.20  

Colombian peso

   1,760.00     1,936.00  

Euro

   0.76     0.77  

Strong bolivar

   4.30     4.30  

Australian dollar

   0.96     0.98  

Boliviano

   6.86     6.86  

Mexican peso

   12.99     13.96  

New Zealand dollar

   1.22     1.28  

Peruvian Sol

   2.69     2.81     2.55     2.69  

Australian dollar

   0.98     0.99  

Strong Bolivar

   4.30     4.30  

Boliviano

   6.86     6.94  

Uruguayan peso

   19.80     19.80     19.05     19.80  

Mexican peso

   13.96     12.38  

Colombian peso

   1,936.00     1,905.10  

New Zealand dollar

   1.28     1.30  

Euro

   0.77     0.75  

For the period ended at December 31, 2012 of Foreign currency and exchange rate differences, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries.

NOTE 32 –34 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

   

For the year ended

December 31,

 
Basic earnings  2011   2010 

Earnings attributable to controlling company’s equity holders (ThUS$)

   320,197     419,702  

Weighted average number of shares, basic

   339,424,598     338,790,909  

Basic earnings per share (US$)

   0.94335     1.23882  

  For the periods ended 
  December 31, 
  2012   2011   2010 

Basic earnings

      

Earnings attributable to controlling company’s equity holders (ThUS$)

   10,956     320,197     419,702  

Weighted average number of shares, basic

   412,267,624     339,424,598     338,790,909  

Basic earnings per share (US$)

   0.02657     0.94335     1.23882  
  For the periods ended 
  December 31, 
  

For the year ended

December 31,

   2012   2011   2010 
Diluted earnings  2011   2010       

Earnings attributable to controlling company’s equity holders (ThUS$)

   320,197     419,702     10,956     320,197     419,702  

Weighted average number of shares, basic

   339,424,598     338,790,909     412,267,624     339,424,598     339,790,909  

Adjustment diluted weighted average shares Stock options

   271,380     954,544  

Adjustment diluted weighted average shares

      

Stock options

   —       271,380     954,544  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Weighted average number of shares, diluted

   339,695,978     339,745,453     412,267,624     339,695,978     339,745,453  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Diluted earnings per share (US$)

   0.94260     1.23534     0.02657     0.94260     1.23534  

F-1-79


LOGO

NOTE 33 –35 - CONTINGENCIES

Lawsuits

 

a)(i)Lawsuits filed by LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries

a1) Actions brought by Lan Airlines S.A. and Subsidiaries.

 

Company

 

Court

 

Case No.

Number

 

Origin

 

Stage and level
of proceedingtrial

 

Amounts
involved

Committed

          ThUS$

Atlantic

Aviation

Investments LLC

(AAI)

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of

New York

07-6022920Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC. (“AAI”), an indirect subsidiary of Lan Airlines S.A. constituted under the laws of the state of Delaware, sued on August 29, 2007 Varig Logística S.A. (“Variglog”) for the non-payment of four loans under loan agreements governed by the law of New York. These agreements provide for the acceleration of the loans in the event of sale of the original debt or, VRG Linhas Aéreas S.A.Stage of execution in Switzerland of judgment condemning Variglog to repay the principal, interest and costs in favor of AAI. An embargo is held over the bank account of Variglog in Switzerland by AAI. Variglog is in the process of judicial recovery in Brazil and requested on Switzerland to recognize the judgment that declared the state of judicial recovery (*)17,100 plus interest and costs

Atlantic Aviation

Investments LLC

(AAI)

 Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New YorkYork. 07-6022920Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC. (“AAI”), an indirect subsidiary LATAM Airlines Group S.A., incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, sued in August 29th, 2007 Varig Logistics S.A. (“Variglog”) for non-payment of four documented loans in credit agreements governed by New York law. These contracts establish the acceleration of the loans in the event of sale of the original debtor, VRG Linhas Aéreas S.A.In implementation stage in Switzerland, the conviction stated that Variglog should pay the principal, interest and costs in favor of AAI. It keeps the embargo of Variglog funds in Switzerland with AAI. Variglog is in the process of judicial recovery in Brazil and has asked Switzerland to recognize the judgment that declared the state of judicial recovery.

17,100

Plus interests

And costs

Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC

(AAI)

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. 602286-09 Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC. (“AAI”) sued on July 24, 2009 Matlin Patterson Global Advisers LLC, Matlin Patterson Global Opportunities Partners II LP, Matlin Patterson Global Opportunities Partners (Cayman) II LP and Volo Logistics LLC Volo (a) as representative foralter egos of Variglog for failure to paynon-payment of the four loans indicatedmentioned in the previous note;note and (b) for a default on their obligationsbreach of guarantorsits obligation to guarantee and other obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding signed bybetween the parties on September 29, 2006. The court dismissed in part and upheld in part the motion to dismiss counterclaims brought by defendants in the case. Both parties appealed this decision. AAI filed a request for summary Judgement (short“summary judgment” (abbreviated trial) thatwhich the court ruled favorably. The defendants appealed from this decision thatwhich was granted suspensive effect (*)ultimately dismissed by the High Court. The cause was turned back to the lower court for determination of the amount actually payable by the applicants (damages). 

17,100

plus interest costs and damages

(*) See Note 38compensation for damage.

F-1-80


LOGO

Company

 

Court

 Case No. 

Origin

 

Stage and level
of proceeding

 

Amounts
involved

          ThUS$

Aerolane, Líneas

Aéreas

Nacionales

del Ecuador S.A.

 

Tax Court of Guayaquil

 6319-4064-05
 

Against the regional director of the Guayaquil Internal Revenue Service for overpayment of VAT.

 

Favorable sentence at first intance, appeal pending against them.

 

4,210

plus interest

Lan Airlines S.A.

 Tax Tribunal of Quito 23493-A Against the regional director of the Quito Internal Revenue Service for overpayment of VAT. Requested sentence. 3,958

Lan Perú S.A.

 

Administrative Tribunal of Perú

 2011
 Lan Peru is suing L.A.P. (Lima Airport concession) for wrong amounts charged by the use of hoses at the airport in Lima. These amounts are intended to supplement what has already been obtained in a ruling that ordered Ositran LAP wrong amounts charged back. 

First intances.

 740

Aerotransportes

Mas de Carga

S.A. de C.V.

 Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice 24611/08
 

Judgement of invalidity against the tax authority’s refusal to restore a balance in favor of VAT.

 

At the stage of offer of proof.

 1,000

Aerolane, Líneas

Aéreas

Nacionales

del Ecuador S.A.

 Distric Tax Court No. 2 (Guayaquil) 09504-2010-
0114
 Against the regional director of the Guayaquil Internal Revenue Service to determine tax credit decreased for the year 2006. 

Practiced evidence

 4,565

Aerolane, Líneas

Aéreas

Nacionales

del Ecuador S.A.

 

Distric Tax Court No. 2 (Guayaquil)

 09503-2010-
0172
 Against the regional director of the Guayaquil Internal Revenue Service for non-payment of advance income tax, 2010. 

Calling for evidence

 696

Aerolane, Líneas

Aéreas

Nacionales

del Ecuador S.A.

 

Distric Tax Court No. 2 (Guayaquil)

 6886-4499-06
 

Against the regional director of the Guayaquil Internal Revenue Service for rectification of tax return for 2003.

 

Sentence pending.

 Undetermined

F-1-81


LOGO

Company

 

Court

 

Case No.Number

 

Origin

 

Stage and level
of proceedingtrial

 

Amounts
involved

Committed

          ThUS$
Aerotransportes Mas de Carga S.A.Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice31698/11-17-01-8Nullity trial against the tax authority’s refusal to restore balance in favor of VAT.Presentation of evidence.4,900

Aerovías deAerolane Lineas

IntegraciónAéreas Nacionales

Regional S.A.

AIRESdel Ecuador S.A.

 Section One, Subsection A, the Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca

2 nd District Court

Guayaquil.

 09504-2010-0114 AEROVIAS DE INTEGRACION REGIONAL S.A AIRESOrder Determining the Value Added Tax (VAT) 2006.Sentence pending4,565

Aerolane Lineas

Aéreas Nacionales

del Ecuador S.A. seeks that Act 043 Session of October 20, 2008 of Grupo Evaluador

Tribunal Fiscal de Proyectos Aerocomerciales GEPA be declared invalid. This relates to

Guayaquil.

6319-4064-05Judicial proceedings against the decision of theRegional Director of the UAEAC and Enrique Olaya Herrera airport in Medellin to order the suspensionInternal Revenue Services Guayaquil, for overpayment of operationstaxes.Tax Litigation Division of the company to and from that airport.National Court accepts appeal of IRS. Extraordinary Action Protection for the Constitutional Court. On June 17, 2010 a decree was issued by which evidence was presented, the status of which was notified on June 22 of that year. On March 8, 2011 the preliminary stages were completed. On July 6, 2011 per state order, Aerocivil was ordered to pay the fees of the expert witness. An appeal was registered against this judgement on July 22.4,210 Plus interest

Aerolane Lineas

Aéreas Nacionales

del Ecuador S.A.

 ThUS$ 2,033 The estimated amount

Internal Revenue

Service.

17502-20120082Determination Act for 2006 Income Tax, which have unknown CEDT requesting certification of damages that were caused to AIRES SA as a resultbranch expenses, ARC commissions without Withholding of the suspension of operations at the Enrique Olaya Herrera airportIncome Tax, etc. Process initiated in Medellin.2012.Sentence pending.8,971

a2)(ii)Lawsuits against LanTrials received by LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries

Company

 

Court

 Case No. 

Origin

 

Stage and level
of proceeding

 

Amounts
involved

          ThUS$

Aerolinhas

Brasileiras S.A.

 Secretary of Finance of State of Río de Janeiro 2003
 The administrative authority of Río de Janeiro, Brazil, notified breach action or fine for alleged non-payment of ICMS (VAT) on import of Boeing-767 aircraft registered No. PR-ABB. 

Pending resolution of the review group to annul the fine.

 3,000

Lan Cargo S.A.

 Civil Court of Asunción, Paraguay 78-362
 Request of indemnification for damages brought by the prior general agent in Paraguay. Pending appeal of the decision to reject one of the exceptions to lack of overt action, made by lawyers for the defendant. 437

F-1-82


LOGO

 

Company

  

Court

  

Case No.Number

  

Origin

  

Stage and level
of proceedingtrial

  

Amounts
involved

Committed

               ThUS$

LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.

y Lan Cargo S.A.

  European commissionCommission and Canada    Investigation for possible violations of possible breaches of freeairline competition of cargo airlines,freighters, especially the fuel surcharge.Onsurcharge. On December 26, 2007, the Director General for Competition of the European Commission notified Lan Cargo S.A.and Lan Airlines S.A. of the instruction of a process against twenty-five cargo airlines, including Lan Cargo S.A., for alleged breaches of free competition in the European air cargo market, especially the intended fixing of a surcharge for fuel and cargo. Dated November 09, 2010 the DirectionDirectorate General for Competition of the European Commission notified Lan Cargo S.A. and LATAM Airlines Group S.A. of a case against twenty-five cargo airlines, including Lan Cargo S.A., for possible violations of free competition in the European air cargo market, especially the alleged fixing a fuel surcharge and freight. On November 9, 2010, the Directorate General for Competition of the European Commission notified Lan Cargo S.A. and LATAM Airlines S.A.Group SA the imposition of finesa fine in the amount of ThUS$ 10,675.$ 10,865. This finepenalty is being appealed by Lan Cargo SA and LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. We can not predict theThe outcome of thethis appeal process.cannot be predicted.  

On April 14, April 2008, the Company answerednotification of the European Commission’s notification.Commission was answered. The appeal was presentedfiled on January 24, 2011.

  10,67510,865
LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A. andy Lan Cargo S.A.  Competition Bureau Canada    Investigation for possible infractionsviolations of airline competition from airlines cargo flights,freighters, especially fuel surcharges.surcharge  

Investigation pending.

pending
  Undetermined

Lan Cargo S.A. and Lan Airlines S.A.

Canada-Superior Court of Quebec, Supreme Court of British Columbia, Superior Court of Ontario

For class actions, as a result of the investigation for possible breaches of competition from airlines cargo flights, especially fuel surcharges. They have filed three lawsuits in Canada (Quebec, British Columbia and Ontario).

Case is in the process of discovery and class certification tests.

850

F-1-83


LOGO

Company

  

Court

  

Case No.Number

  

Origin

  

Stage and level
of proceedingtrial

  

Amounts
involved

Committed

               ThUS$
Lan Cargo S.A. and Lany LATAM Airlines Group S.A.  In the High Court of Justice Chancery Division (England)(Inglaterra) and Directie Juridische Zaken Afdeling Ceveil Recht (Netherlands).    

LawsuitLawsuits filed against European Airlinesairlines by users of freight services in private prosecutions as a consequenceresult of the investigation into alleged breachesfor possible violations of freeairline competition of cargo airlines,freighters, especially fuel surcharges. Lan Airlines S.A. andsurcharge. Lan Cargo S.A. and LATAM Airlines Group S.A, have been third- party defendantssued in such prosecutionscourt proceedings as third parties, based in England and the Netherlands.

  

Case is in the process ofevidence discovery tests.

process.
  Undetermined
Lan Logistics, Corp.Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.Juzgado Tercero Civil del Circuito de Bogotá—  On December 10, 2008, the aircraft HK-4491 was in the airport in Bucaramanga, and after start of the engine No. 2, to start the engine starting procedure of the engine No. 1, failure occurred in the start system and pressurization of the aircraft. The demander, Mrs. Milena Paez, alleged contractual liability for what happened because she lost hearing capacity in her right ear and her family, professional and community life were affected, breaking the obligation to keep airline passengers safe until their destination.On July 31, 2012 the demander filed a memorial rectifying the demand. By order on August 23, 2012 (reported by state August 27, 2012), the Court considered the demand remedied and resolved the preliminary objection requirement, stating that it did not prosper. Also ordered to pay the costs guarantee call for a million pesos COP. ($ 1,000,000).Aires S.A. was demanded with a main claim of approximately ThUS$ 1,768, i.e. COP 1,900 million (equivalent to 3,550 SMMLV (*), plus the interests liquidated from December 2008, an item that generates an additional COP 1,500 million, equivalent to 2,800 SMMLV).

(*)SMMLV: Current legal monthly minimum wage.

Company

  

Federal Court Florida, U.S.A.

  In mid June 2008 a demand was presented for purchase option right for sale of LanBox.

Case Number

  

Failed against Lanlogistics, Corp. for $5 million plus interest, which is appealing to the court of appeals.Origin

  Undetermined

Stage of trial

Amounts

Committed

ThUS$
Aerolinhas Brasileiras S.A.Administrative Council for Economic Defense, Brazil—  Investigation for possible violations of airline competition freighters, especially fuel surchargeInvestigation pending. CADE has not yet issued a final decision.Indetermined
LATAM Airlines Group S.A.Tenth Civil Court of Santiago—  The company Jara Jara and Limited sues LATAM Airlines Group S.A. based on the damage they have caused due to the criminal complaints filed for the crime of fraud against them in 2008, which were dismissed for good. They claim that the damage caused by LATAM Airlines Group S.A. affected their prestige and business continuity.First instance.11,935

Aerovías de Integración Regional S.A. AIRESAerolane LineasAéreas Nacionales

del Ecuador S.A.

  

Civil Court of the Circuit of Bogota20

Pichincha.

  374-2012LA  On December 10th 2008, HK-4491 aircraft was atPassenger demand for misuse by counter agent of credit card.Waiting for conciliation hearing date.5,500
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Tribunal Regional Federal da 2 da Região the Bucaramanga airport and after starting engine n°2 as the starting procedure of engine n°1 began; there was a failure in the startup system and pressurization(Court of the aircraft. The complainant, Mrs. Milena Paez, claimsSecond Region).2001.51.01.012530-0Ordinary judicial action brought to declare that there is a civil contractual liability since, dueno legal relationship obligating the Company to hearing loss in her right ear which affected her family, professional, and community life,raise the airline failed in its obligationAir Fund.Protection granted to bringremove the passenger safely to her destination.charge by the Fundo Aeroviário (FA). Pending the completion of the survey.123,204

Company

  

AiresCourt

Case Number

Origin

Stage of trial

Amounts

Committed

ThUS$
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A. was servedTribunal Regional Federal da 3a Região (Court of the Third Region)2007.61.05.014317-3 (AI 2008.03.00.004494-2)Requirements presented to eliminate possible sanctions for noncompliance with special customs regime of temporary admission.The main process associated with this case ruled favorably to the interests of the Company. Currently awaiting the implementation of the same decision in the present case.50,205
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretary of Federal Revenues of Brazil (Internal Revenue Service of Brazil).16643.000087/2009-36Notice of Violation of the requirement to pay the social contribution on net profit (“CSL”).Decisions of first and second administrative instance adverse to the interests of the Company. Currently awaiting the decision of the new action brought by the Company.35,447
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretary of Federal Revenues of Brazil (Internal Revenue Service of Brazil).10880.725950/2011-05Compensation claims of social contributions PIS and COFINS.Currently awaiting for the judgment in the event of disagreement presented by the Company.32,586
Pantanal Linhas Aéreas S.A.Regional Court of the Third District.1997.0002503-9Execution filed to collect tax penalties for breach of special customs regime of temporary admission.Waiting for the decision of the second instance. Favorable sentence.25,789
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretary of Federal Revenues of Brazil (Internal Revenue Service of Brazil).10314.720181/2011-75Order to require the collection of II, IPI and social contributions PIS and COFINS affecting imports of aircraft components.Pending the decision of the first weekadministrative instance.23,792
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretary of December 2011Federal Revenues of Brazil (Internal Revenue Service of Brazil).16643.000085/2009-47Order compound to demand the income tax and CSL derived from royalties expense detail and the use of the brand TAM.First instance decision unfavorable to the interests of the company. Currently expecting ruling on the petitionappeal filed by the Company.15,687

Company

Court

Case Number

Origin

Stage of trial

Amounts

Committed

ThUS$
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretary of Federal Revenues of Brazil (Internal Revenue Service of Brazil).10831.012344/2005-55Infraction II presented to demand payment and issocial contributions of PIS and COFINS arising from the loss of unidentified international cargo.Partially favorable decision at the first administrative level. Currently awaiting the decision of appeal by the Company.12,619
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo)3.123.785-0Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Currently expecting the ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.10,951
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.130.043-1Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Currently expecting ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.10,531
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.099.486-0Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Currently expecting ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.10,531
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretary of Federal Revenues of Brazil (Internal Revenue Service of Brazil).11610.001360/2001-56Application for reimbursement of social security contributions of PIS.Unfavorable ruling in timethe first and second administrative instances. Currently expecting fiscal execution ruling.8,864
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo.3.117.001-8Notice of infringement demanding payment of ICMS on imports of aircraft.Pending decision on the appeal filed by the Company.8,712

Company

  

Court

  

Case Number

  

Origin

  

Stage of trial

  

Amounts

Committed

               ThUS$
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo.  3.120.346-2  Notice of infringement demanding payment of ICMS on imports of aircraft.  Pending decision on the appeal filed by the company.  8,375
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Tribunal Regional Federal da 3a Região (Court of the Third Region).  2006.03.00.022504-6  Penalty forcing IRPJ collection in the months of February, March and August 1998.  Pending first instance ruling.  8,066
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).  3.120.355-3  Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.  Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.  7,970
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretary of Federal Revenues of Brazil (Internal Revenue Service of Brazil).  0045794  Notice of infraction registered to demand payment of COFINS social contribution in the third quarter of 1997.  Expected the ruling on impeachment filed by the Company.  7,941
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).  3.120.286-0  Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.  Trial suspended. It now expects the end of main trial.  7,234
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Governo do Estado de São Paulo (State Government of Sao Paulo).  990.172  Fiscal Execution to demand payment of ICMS that affects the import of aircraft.  Trial suspended. It now expects the end of main trial.  6,956

Company

Court

Case Number

Origin

Stage of trial

Amounts

Committed

ThUS$
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.123.000-3Order of infringement to answer,demand payment of ICMS governing the due date being January 23rd 2012importation of aircraft.Trial suspended. It now expects the end of main trial.6,950
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.099.563-2Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.6,427
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Internal Revenue Service.2002.61.19.001123-1Injunction filed to prevent recovery of IPI on imports of aircraft.Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.6,360
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).4.002.475-1Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Expected the ruling on impeachment filed by the Company.6,184
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.019.886-0Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Trial suspended. It now expects the end of main trial.5,693
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado da Paraíba (Secretary of Finance of the State of Paraiba).93300008.09.00000883/2009-31Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS in particular operations.Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.5,626

Company

Court

Case Number

Origin

Stage of trial

Amounts

Committed

ThUS$
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.123.770-8Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.5,604
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.154.701-1Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Expected the ruling on impeachment filed by the Company.5,480
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.146.575-4Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Trial suspended. It now expects the end of main trial.5,309
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Receita Federal (Internal Revenue Service).10880-676.339/2009-13Order of infringement to demand payment of IRPJ.Expected the ruling on impeachment filed by the Company.5,264
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.National Social Security Institute – INSS.2006.03.00.080569-5Regular judicial action filed to cancel the collection of INSS on amounts paid by way of transportation benefit.Pending decision on the appeal filed by the company.5,202
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).3.146.651-5Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.Trial suspended. It now expects the end of main trial.5,174

Company

  

Court

  

Case Number

  

Origin

  

Stage of trial

  

Amounts

Committed

               ThUS$
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de Goiás (Secretaria de Hacienda del Estado de Goias).  3032722060291  Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS in particular operations.  Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.  5,309
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretaria da Receita Federal (Servicio de Impuestos Internos de Brazil).  16643.000088/2009-81  Order of infringement to demand payment of IRPJ and CSLL.  Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.  4,850
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).  3.117.801-7  Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.  Trial suspended. It now expects the end of main trial.  4,816
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado de São Paulo (Secretary of Finance of the State of Sao Paulo).  3.129.987-8  Order of infringement to demand payment of ICMS governing the importation of aircraft.  Currently awaiting a ruling on the appeal filed by the Company.  4,537
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.  1st Civil Court of the District of Navegantes / SC.  033.03.013110-6 (precautionary) 033.03.014870-0 (ordinary).  Action filed by a former sales representative of TAM demanding compensation for moral and economic damage in consequence of the alleged wrongful termination of contract and unfounded trade representative land freight transport other than agreeing in advance the establishment of protection enforceable court.  

We are currently awaiting the evaluation of our objection to the expert report.

  4,637

Company

Court

Case Number

Origin

Stage of trial

Amounts

Committed

ThUS$
Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Labour Court of Porto Alegre.0000504-79.2010.5.04.0014Class action by the Union of Aviation Workers of Porto Alegre which requires payment of the bond risk for maintenance employees.

Process in the last instance, waiting

judgment of appeal.

5,046

Approximate value /

Estimated

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Labour Justice Guarulhos / SP - Jurisdiction of Labor Guarulhos.0000728-47.2010.5.02.0313Class action by the Union of Aviation Workers of Guarulhos/SP which requires payment of risk bonus for all workers of the base.Process in the second instance, awaiting the judgment of the appeal on both parts.

53,020

Approximate value /

Estimated

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Labour Justice Salvador / BA - Labor Jurisdiction Salvador / BA.0000033-78.2011.5.05.0021Class action by the National Union of Aviation workers, which requires payment of risk bonus for all employees of the SSA base.Process in the first instance. Awaiting sentencing.

13,010

Approximate value /

Estimated

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Labour Justice Sao Paulo.001680-652011.5.02.0030  Action against Airesby the Union State Aerovias de São Paulo/SP that requires payment of hazard pay for all employees.Procedure according to completion.

15,645

Approximate value /

Estimated

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A. with an initial aspirationLabour Court Brasilia.01683.2009.015.10.003Action by the Union Aerovias Brasilia/DF demanding payment of ThUS$ 1,768 that is ThCOP 1,899,650 (equivalent 3,550 SMMLV plushazard compensation for all maintenance employees.Process in the corresponding accrued interest since December 2008, title that generates an additional quantitylast instance. Awaiting the outcome of ThCOP 1,500,000 equivalent to 2,800 SMMLV).the appeal.

4,717

Approximate value /

Estimated

In order to deal with any financial obligations arising from legal proceedings outstanding at December 31, 2012, whether civil, labor or tax, LATAM Airlines Group S.A., has made provisions, which at the end of these financial statements, reached the sum of ThUS$ 466,848 which is disclosed in Note 23.

F-1-84


LOGO

Company

 

Court

 Case No. 

Origin

 

Stage and level
of proceeding

 

Amounts
involved

          ThUS$

Aerolinhas Brasileiras S.A.

 Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, Brasil  

Investigation of alleged breaches of free competition of cargo airlines, especially fuel surcharges.

 

Investigation pending. CADE and Federal Attorney not yet issued final decisions.

 Undetermined

Lan Airlines S.A. “Brazil”

 Instituto de Defesa do Consumidor de Sao Paulo  The Department of Consumer Protection and Defense (“PROCON”) has applied a fine to Lan Airlines S.A. in the amount of MR$ 1,688 equivalent to approximately ThUS$ 905. This penalty relates to the cancellation of flights to Chile as a product of the 2010 earthquake, holding that Lan Airlines S.A. did not act in accordance with the rules applicable to the facilities and offered no compensation to passengers who could not travel as a result of this extraordinary circumstance. 

Fine imposed by the consumer entity Sao Paulo.

 905

Lan Perú S.A.

 

Administrative Tribunal of Peru

 2011 LAP (Lima Airport concession) is questioning before an administrative tribunal’s decision to the administrative authority Ositran, which in due course LAP stated that it had to give certain amounts uncollected by Lan Peru for the use of hoses in the Lima Airport. 

First instance.

 2.109

Lan Cargo S.A

 Tribunal of Arbitration, Frankfurt/ Germany  Aerohandling Airport Assistance GmbH (Handling company in Frankfurt/ Airport) is claiming additional payment for Lan Cargo S.A. services offered over the years 2007 to 2010. Single instance. 820

F-1-85


LOGO

ConsideringThe Company has not disclosed the stageindividual probability of processsuccess for each of the cases mentioned above and/or the improbable event of obtaining an adverse sentence, as of December 31, 2011 the Company has estimated that iscontingency in order to not necessary to make a provision for any case, with the exception of the significant matter relating to the European Commission which was reported to the SVS. A provision of US$ 11 million has been recorded for the decision issued by the European Commission on November 9, 2010.negatively affect its outcome.

On May 6 2011, the Directors of Lan Cargo S.A. and Aerolinhas Brasileiras S.A. approved a judicial agreement with the defenders of the civil class action case that was in process before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. From the agreement, Lan Cargo S.A. and Aerolinhas Brasileiras S.A. committed to pay the amount of US$ 59.7 million and US$ 6.3 million, respectively, payments that were already made as of December 31, 2011. This agreement terminates the companies´ obligations with regards to all plaintiffs who will not choose to file a suit in an individual capacity against the companies. The terms of the judgment have not yet been set for the plaintiffs who are considering opting for a separate suit.

NOTE 34 –36 - COMMITMENTS

 

(a)Loan covenants

With respect to various loans signed by the Company for the financing of Boeing 767, 777 and 787 aircraft, which carry the guarantee of the United States Export–Import Bank, limits have been set on some of the Company’s financial indicators on a consolidated basis. Moreover, and related to these same contracts, restrictions are also in place on the Company’s management in terms of its ownership and disposal of assets.

Additionally, with respect to various loans signed by its subsidiary Lan Cargo S.A. for the financing of Boeing 767767F and 777F aircraft, which carry the guarantee of the United States Export – Export–Import Bank, restrictions have been established to the Company’s management and its subsidiary Lan Cargo S.A. in terms of shareholder composition and disposal of assets.

Regarding the various contracts of the Company for the financing of Airbus A320 aircraft, which are guaranteed by the European Export Credit Agencies, limits have been established on some of the Company’s financial indicators. Moreover, and related to these same contracts, restrictions are also in place on the Company’s management in terms of its ownership and disposal of assets.

In connection with the financing of spare engines for its Boeing 767, 767F, 777, 777F and 777 fleet,787, which are guaranteed by the Export - Import Bank of the United States, restrictions have been placed on the ownership structure of their guarantors and their legal successor in case of merger.

In relation to credit agreements entered into by the Company, for the current yearperiod local banks have set limits to some financial indicators of the Company on a consolidated basis.

At December 31, 2011,2012, the Company is in compliance with these covenants.indicators.

F-1-86


LOGOThe subsidiary TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., in connection with the issuance of debentures (CVM 476) by original amount of ThR$ 600,000 in 2009, has established financial limit indicators to TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.. Anticipating a possible declaration of breach of this limit at the end of December 2012, TAM Linheas Aéreas S.A. requested a waiver to the Asamblea General de Debenturista and according to IFRS accounting standards, financial liabilities related to this issuance of debentures are classified in current financial liabilities. On February 14, 2013, the Asamblea General de Debenturista granted the requested waiver and as a result, this obligation shall be classified within current financial liabilities and non-current in the next financial statements.

(b)Commitments under operating leases as lessee

Details of the main operating leases are as follows:

 

Lessor

  Aircraft As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2010
 

ACS Aircraft Finance Bermuda Ltd. – Aircastle (WFBN)

  Boeing 737  1    1  

AerCap (WFBN)

  Airbus A320  —      1  

Aircraft 76B-26261 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Aircraft 76B-26327 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Aircraft 76B-26329 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Aircraft 76B-27597 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Aircraft 76B-27613 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Aircraft 76B-27615 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Aircraft 76B-28206 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Aircraft Solutions Lux V S.ÀR.L. (AVMAX)

  Bombardier Dhc8-200  1    —    

Avolon Aerospace AOE 19 Limited

  Airbus A320  1    —    

Avolon Aerospace AOE 20 Limited

  Airbus A320  1    —    

Avolon Aerospace AOE 6 Limited

  Airbus A320  1    —    

AWAS 4839 Trust

  Airbus A320  1    —    

BOC Aviation Pte. Ltd.

  Airbus A320  1    —    

Celestial Aviation Trading 16 Ltd. – GECAS (WFBN)

  Boeing 767  1    1  

Celestial Aviation Trading 23 Ltd. – GECAS (WFBN)

  Boeing 777  1    1  

Celestial Aviation Trading 35 Ltd. (GECAS)

  Boeing 767  1    1  

Celestial Aviation Trading 39 Ltd. – GECAS (WFBN)

  Boeing 777  1    1  

Celestial Aviation Trading 47 Ltd. – GECAS (WFBN)

  Boeing 767  1    1  

Celestial Aviation Trading 48 Ltd. – GECAS (WFBN)

  Boeing 767  1    —    

Celestial Aviation Trading 51 Ltd. – GECAS (WFBN)

  Boeing 767  1    1  

CIT Aerospace International

  Boeing 767  1    1  

Delaware Trust Company, National Association (CRAFT)

  Bombardier Dhc8-200  9    9  

International Lease Finance Corp. (ILFC)

  Boeing 737  2    2  

International Lease Finance Corp. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767  1    8  

JB 30244, Inc. – AWAS

  Boeing 737  1    1  

JB 30249, Inc. – AWAS

  Boeing 737  1    1  

KN Operating Limited (NAC)

  Bombardier Dhc8-400  4    4  

MCAP Europe Limited – Mitsubishi (WTC)

  Boeing 737  1    1  

MSN 167 Leasing Limited

  Airbus A340  1    1  

MSN 32415, LLC – AWAS

  Boeing 737  1    1  

NorthStar AvLease Ltd.

  Bombardier Dhc8-200  —      1  

Orix Aviation Systems Limited

  Airbus A320  2    2  

Pembroke B737-7006 Leasing Limited

  Boeing 737  2    2  

Sunflower Aircraft Leasing Limited – AerCap

  Airbus A320  2    2  

TIC Trust (AVMAX)

  Bombardier Dhc8-200  —      1  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    49    45  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Lessor

  

Aircraft

  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 

ACS Aircraft Finance Bermuda Ltd. - Aircastle (WFBN)

  Boeing 737   1     1  

Air Canada (Sublessor)

  Airbus A340   1     1  

Airbus Financial Services

  Airbus A340   2     —    

Aircraft 76B-26261 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767   1     1  

Aircraft 76B-26327 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767   —       1  

Aircraft 76B-26329 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767   1     1  

Aircraft 76B-27597 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767   —       1  

Aircraft 76B-27613 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767   1     1  

Aircraft 76B-27615 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767   1     1  

Aircraft 76B-28206 Inc. (ILFC)

  Boeing 767   1     1  

Aircraft Solutions Lux V S.ÀR.L. (AVMAX)

  Bombardier Dhc8-200   1     1  

ALC A319 1703, LLC (*)

  Airbus A319   1     —    

Aviacion Centaurus, A.I.E (Santander) (*)

  Airbus A319   3     —    

Aviación Centaurus, A.I.E. (*)

  Airbus A321   1     —    

Aviación Real A.I.E (*)

  Airbus A319   1     —    

Aviación Real A.I.E (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

Aviación Tritón A.I.E. (*)

  Airbus A319   3     —    

Avolon Aerospace AOE 19 Limited

  Airbus A320   1     1  

Avolon Aerospace AOE 20 Limited

  Airbus A320   1     1  

Avolon Aerospace AOE 6 Limited

  Airbus A320   1     1  

AWAS (SWEDEN TWO) AB (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

AWAS 4839 Trust

  Airbus A320   1     1  

AWAS 5125 Trust

  Airbus A320   1     —    

AWAS 5178 Limited

  Airbus A320   1     —    

AWAS 5234 Trust

  Airbus A320   1     —    

Baker & Spice Aviation Limited (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

BOC Aviation Pte. Ltd.

  Airbus A320   1     1  

Celestial Aviation Trading 35 Ltd. (GECAS)

  Boeing 767   1     1  

CIT Aerospace International

  Boeing 767   1     1  

CIT Aerospace International (*)

  Airbus A319   3     —    

CIT Aerospace International (*)

  Airbus A320   4     —    

Continuity Air Finance IV B.V (BOC) (*)

  Airbus A319   1     —    

Delaware Trust Company, National Association (CRAFT)

  Bombardier Dhc8-200   9     9  

Eden Irish Aircr Leasing MSN 1459 (AERCAP) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

GECAS Sverige Aircraft Leasing Worldwide AB (*)

  Airbus A320   10     —    

Lessor

  

Aircraft

  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 

GECAS Sverige Aircraft Leasing Worldwide AB (*)

  Airbus A330   2     —    

GFL Aircraft Leasing Netherlands B.V. (GECAS) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

International Lease Finance Corporation

  Boeing 737   2     2  

International Lease Finance Corporation

  Boeing 767   1     1  

International Lease Finance Corporation (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

JB 30244, Inc. - AWAS

  Boeing 737   —       1  

JB 30249, Inc. - AWAS

  Boeing 737   —       1  

KN Operating Limited (NAC)

  Bombardier Dhc8-400   4     4  

MASL Sweden (1) AB (MACQUARIE) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

MASL Sweden (2) AB (MACQUARIE) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

MASL Sweden (7) AB (MACQUARIE) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

MASL Sweden (8) AB (MACQUARIE) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

MCAP Europe Limited - Mitsubishi (WTC)

  Boeing 737   1     1  

MSN 32415, LLC - AWAS

  Boeing 737   —       1  

Orix Aviation Systems Limited

  Airbus A320   3     2  

Pembroke B737-7006 Leasing Limited

  Boeing 737   2     2  

RBS Aerospace Limited (*)

  Airbus A320   6     —    

SKY HICH V LEASING COMPANY LIMITED (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

Sunflower Aircraft Leasing Limited - AerCap

  Airbus A320   2     2  

Volito Aviation August 2007 AB (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

Volito Aviation November 2006 AB (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

Volito Brasilien AB (*)

  Airbus A319   1     —    

Volito November 2006 AB (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

Wells Fargo Bank North National Association (ACG) (*)

  Airbus A319   1     —    

Wells Fargo Bank North National Association (ACG) (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

Wells Fargo Bank North National Association (BAKER & SPICE) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

Wells Fargo Bank North National Association (BOC) (*)

  Airbus A319   3     —    

Wells Fargo Bank North National Association (BOC) (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest N.A (AVOLON) (*)

  Airbus A320   4     —    

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest National Association (ACG) (*)

  Airbus A320   2     —    

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest National Association (BOC) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. (GECAS)

  Boeing 767   4     4  

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. (GECAS)

  Boeing 777   2     2  

Wilmington Trust Company (ILFC) (*)

  Airbus A319   1     —    

Zipdell Limited (BBAM ) (*)

  Airbus A320   1     —    
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     123     49  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-1-87
(*)The composition of the fleet as operating leases at December 31, 2012, incorporates the effects of Business Combinations with TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries. The rentals are shown in results for the period for which they are incurred.


LOGO

During 2011, 7 of 8 Boeing 767 aircraft leased to “International Lease Finance Corp. (ILFC), were transferred by the lessor to seven different special purpose entities. Further, in December 2011, NorthStar AvLease Ltd. transferred a Bombardier Dhc8-200 aircraft to Aircraft Solutions Lux V S.ÀR.L. (AVMAX)

The rentals are shown in results for the period for which they are incurred.

The minimum future lease payments not yet payable are the following:

 

  As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2010
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2011
 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

No later than one year

   169,842     151,781     380,713     169,842  

Between one and five years

   443,256     440,632     852,659     443,256  

Over five years

   92,264     107,593     235,658     92,264  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   705,362     700,006     1,469,030     705,362  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The minimum lease payments charged to income are the following:

 

  

For the year ended

December 31,

   

For the periods ended

December 30,

 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Minimum operating lease payments (*)

   168,369     93,219     81,425  

Minimum operating lease payments

   310,496     168,369     93,219  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   168,369     93,219     81,425     310,496     168,369     93,219  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

In SeptemberDecember 2010, the Company added one Airbus A320-200A 320-200 aircraft for a period of eight months, the latter finally returned in May 2011. Additionally, in November and December 2010 the Company added two Boeing 767-300F aircraft, with termsfor periods of contract for seven and six yearsmonths, respectively.

In January 2011 the Company added to the fleet three aircraft, a Boeing 767-300F with a contract term of five years, one Airbus A320-200 for a period of seven years and one Airbus A319-100 for a period of four months which was returned in May 2011. In July 2011 the Company added two Airbus A320-200 aircrafts for a period of eight years, while in August and September 2011, the Company received an Airbus A320-200 aircraft for a period of eight years. On the other hand, in September 2011 ana Bombardier Dhc8-200 aircraft was returned due to termination of the lease term.

In September 2011, the Company signed a contract to establish the early departure of three Boeing 737-700. The return of these three aircraft was completed during the second quarter of 2012.

(*)At December 31, 2011, includes an amount of ThUS$ 44,011 as a result of the incorporation of AIRES S.A. as a subsidiary as of December 2010.

During the second quarter of 2012, added three Airbus A320-200 aircraft leased for a period of 8 years. During the third quarter of 2012, it the Company added two Airbus A320-200 aircraft, leased for periods of 6 and 8 years. In addition, two Boeing 767-300 aircraft and two Airbus A320-200 were returned given the end of the lease contract.

The operating lease agreements signed by the Company and its subsidiaries state that maintenance of the aircraft should be done according to the manufacturer’s technical instructions and within the margins agreed in the leasing agreements, a cost that must be assumed by the lessee. The lessee should also contract insurance for each aircraft to cover associated risks and the amounts of these assets. Regarding rental payments, these are unrestricted and may not be netted against other accounts receivable or payable between the lessor and lessee.

F-1-88


LOGO

At December 31, 20112012 the Company has existing letters of credit relationsrelated to operating leasing as follows:

 

Acreedor GarantíaCreditor Guarantee

  Nombre deudor

Debtor

  Tipo

Type

  ValorValue
MUS$ThUS$
   Fecha de
liberación

Release

date

Air Canada

  LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.  One letter of credit   1,800    Jun 30, 2012February 13, 2013

Celestial Aviation Trading 16 LtdLimited

  Lan Cargo S.A.  Two lettersletter of credit   3,500    AprApril 25, 20122013

CelestialGE Capital Aviation Trading 35 LtdServices Ltd.

  LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.  OneSix letter of credit   2,50017,052    Jun 13, 2012

CIT Aerospace International

Lan Airlines S.A.Two letters of credit3,240MayJanuary 10, 20122013

GE Capital Aviation Services LtdLtd.

  Lan Cargo S.A.  Eight lettersFive letter of credit   23,68215,222    Apr 25, 2012November 16, 2013

International Lease Finance Corp.

  LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.  Eight lettersletter of credit   3,880    Aug 25, 2012February 26, 2013

Orix Aviation System Limited

  LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.  Two lettersletter of credit   6,520    May 5, 20122013

TAF Mercury

  LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.  One letter of credit   4,000    DecDecember 11, 20122013

TAF Venus

  LanLATAM Airlines Group S.A.  One letter of credit   4,000    DecDecember 11, 20122013

CIT Aerospace International

  LATAM Airlines Group S.A.Two letter of credit3,240May 13, 2013

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, Nat. Assoc.

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.One letter of credit2,530June 30, 2013

Baker & Spice Aviation Limited

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Four letter of credit30,428April 23, 2013

BOC Aviation (USA) Corporation

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Four letter of credit8,365February 3, 2013

CIT Aerospace International

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Seven letter of credit26,382January 10, 2013

DVB Group Merchant Bank (Asia) Ltd.

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Two letter of credit6,386April 13, 2013

GE Capital Aviation Services Ltd.

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Twelve letter of credit8,380May 23, 2013

MASL Sweden (2) AB

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Six letter of credit6,163October 4, 2013

RBS Aerospace Limited

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Five letter of credit7,425May 31, 2013

SMBC Aviation

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Three letter of credit12,143February 24, 2013

VOLITO November 2006 ab

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.Three letter of credit1,311September 17, 2013
      

 

 

   
       53,122168,727    
      

 

 

   

(c)Other commitments

At December 31, 20112012 the Company has existing letters of credit, certificates of deposits and warranty insurance policies as follows:

 

Creditor Guarantee

  

Debtor

  

Type

  Value
ThUS$
   

Release

date

Deutsche Bank A.G.

  Lan

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

  Two letters

Three letter of credit

   20,00030,000    Jan

January 31, 2012

2013

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc

  Lan

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

  

Two lettersletter of credit

   18,000    Jan

January 8, 2012

2013

Dirección General de Aviación Civil de Chile

  Lan

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

  Forty-five certificates of deposits

Sixty two ticket guarantee

   7,28216,970    Jan 31, 2012

September 1, 2013

Washington International InsuranceComisión Europea

  Lan

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

  Six letters

One letter of credit

   2,99010,686    Apr 6, 2012

February 11, 2013

Dirección Seccional de Aduanas de Bogotá

  

Línea Aérea Carguera
de Colombia S.A.

  Two warranty

Three insurance policies

   2,7025,025    

June 10, 2013

Apr 7, 2012

Washington International Insurance

  

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

Six letter of credit

2,700

April 5, 2013

Metropolitan Dade County

  Lan

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

  

Five lettersletter of credit

   1,675    

May 31, 20122013

PK AIRFINANCE US, INC.

  

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

Three letter of credit

4,800

September 23, 2013

GE Capital Aviation Services Limited

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

Three letter of credit

4,162

October 8, 2013

12ª Vara cível da comarca de Natal/rn

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

2,347

May 17, 2013

6ª Vara da fazenda publica de São Paulo/sp

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

2,474

March 1, 2013

3ª Vara da fazenda publica de São Paulo/sp

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

1,402

May 28, 2014

12ª Vara da fazenda publica do Estado de Sao Paulo

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

1,392

January 28, 2014

Vara de execuções fiscais de Santa Cataria

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

3,780

November 20, 2013

6ª Vara de execuções fiscais federal de Campo Grande/ms

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

Two insurance policies

73,142

January 4, 2014

União Federal

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

2,533

July 24, 2015

Execuções fiscais estaduais da Comarca de São Paulo

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

1,158

May 25, 2014

2ª Vara cível da comarca de Bauru / SP

Tam Linhas Aéreas S.A.

One insurance policies

1,000

November 14, 2014

      

 

 

   
       52,649183,246    
      

 

 

   

F-1-89


LOGO

NOTE 35 –37 - TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

 

a)Transactions with related parties for the yearperiod ended December 31, 20112012

 

Nature of
relationship withExplanation of other information aboutNature of related partiesAmount of

Tax No.

 

Related party

 Relationshiprelated parties Country
of origin
 Other information
on related partyparties
 Transaction

transactions

 Currency Amount of
transactions
 
              ThUS$ 

96.810.370-9

 

Inversiones Costa

Verde Ltda. y CPA.

 Controlling
    shareholder
 Chile Investments Property rental grantedRevenue from services provided CLP  7111  
Verde Ltda. y CPAshareholderPassenger services providedCLP19

96.847.880-K

 

Lufthansa Lan Technical

Training S.A.

 Associate Chile Training center Property rental granted

Leases as lessor

Services received

Services received

CLP
CLP
US$
  

411

(1,101

(803


65.216.000-K

Comunidad MujerOther related
    parties
ChilePromotion and
women empowerment

Revenue from services provided

Services received

CLP
CLP
  

13

(13

  122
Training S.A.Payments on behalf receivedCLP(19

Training receivedCLP(633
Payments on behalf receivedUS$(82
Training receivedUS$(512

78.591.370-1

 Bethia S.A. yS.A.y Filiales (1) Other related
parties

 Chile Investments 

Leases as lessor

Revenue from services provided

Commitments made on behalf of the entity

Services received

Sale of Property rental grantedplant and equipment (1)

 CLP
CLP
CLP
CLP
CLP

741

897

3

(786

14,217


79.773.440-3

Transportes San Felipe S.A.Other related
    parties
ChileTransportServices received CLP  546
Professional advice grantedCLP300
Services provided air cargo
transport
CLP1.381
Other service receivedCLP(109279
Payments on behalf receivedCLP(345
Sale of subsidiariesCLP53.386

87.752.000-5

 Granja Marina
Tornagaleones S.A.
 Other related
parties
 Chile Fish farmingPisciculture PassengerRevenue from services provided CLP  199243  

96.812.280-0

San Alberto S.A. y FilialesOther related
    parties
ChileInvestmentsServices receivedUS$(29

Foreign

 Inversora Aeronáutica
Argentina
 Other related
parties
 Argentina Investments Property rental granted
Payments

Leases as lessor

Liabilities settlement on behalf providedof the entity for the

related party

 
US$
US$

  

 

(412442

81111


  

96.625.340-1Foreign

 Inversiones Mineras del
Cantabrico S.A.Tadef-Transporte Administração e Participação Ltda.
 Other related
parties
 ChileBrazil InvestmentsTransport Payments on behalfServices received US$  (18

Foreign

TAM Aviação Executiva e Taxi Aéreo S/AOther related
    parties
BrazilTransport

Revenue from services provided

Liabilities settlement on behalf of the entity for the

related party

BRL
BRL

306

3


Foreign

Made In Everywhere Repr. Com. Distr. Ltda.Other related
    parties
BrazilTransportServices receivedBRL (811211)

Foreign

Prismah Fidelida S/AOther related
    parties
BrazilMarketingLiabilities settlement on behalf of the entity for the related partyBRL419  

 

(1)On April 06, 2011 Lan Cargo S.A. e Inversiones Lan S.A., subsidiaries of Lan AirlinesDecember 28, 2012, Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica S.A. as sellers,seller and Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Inversiones Betmin SpA, subsidiariesSotraser S.A. (Subsidiary of Bethia S.A. company,) as purchasers,purchaser, entered into a contract of sale with respectan agreement to 100%purchase the land called “Lot No. 12 of the social capital of companies Blue Express Intl Ltda. and Blue Express S.A.parcellation proyect Lo Echevers.” The sale value of Blue Express Intl. Ltda and subsidiary was forthe sale amounted to ThUS$ 53,386.14,217.

F-1-90


LOGO

b)Transactions with related parties for the yearperiod ended December 31, 20102011

 

CountryExplanation of other informationNature of related partiesAmount of

Tax No.

  

Related party

  Relationship  Country of origin  Other information on
about related partyparties
  Transaction

transactions

  Currency  Amount of
transactions
 
                     ThUS$ 

96.810.370-9

  

Inversiones Costa

Verde Ltda. y CPACPA.

  Controlling

shareholder

  Chile  Investments  Property rental granted
PassengerLeases as lessor Revenue from services provided
  
CLP
CLP

   

7771
13

19

  

96.847.880-K

  

Lufthansa Lan Technical

Training S.A.

  Associate  Chile  Training center  Property rental granted

Leases as lessor

Services received

Services received

  CLP
CLP
US$

122

(652

(594


78.591.370-1

Bethia S.A. y Filiales (1)Other related

parties

ChileInvestments

Leases as lessor

Revenue from services provided

Cession granted debt

Services received

Sale of subsidiaries

CLP
CLP
CLP
CLP
CLP

546

1,683

4,461

(456

53,386


87.752.000-5

Granja Marina

Tornagaleones S.A.

Other related

parties

ChileFish farmingRevenue from services provided  CLP   17199  

96.625.340-1

  Training

Inversiones Mineras del

Cantabrico S.A.

  Other related

parties

  Chile  Investments  Assignment of debt grantedCLP18
Payments on behalfOther prepayments receivedCLP(16
Training receivedCLP(356
Payments on behalf received  US$   (95811

Foreign

  Inversora Aeronáutica Argentina  Other related

parties

  Argentina  Investments  Training received

Leases as lessee

Other prepayments granted

  US$
US$
   

(412

811

(363

(1)On April 6, 2011, Lan Cargo S.A. and Inversiones Lan S.A., subsidiaries of LATAM Airlines Groups S.A. as sellers and Servicios de Transporte Limitada and Inversiones Betmin SpA., subsidiaries of Bethia S.A., as purchasers, entered into a contract of sale related to 100% of the social equity of companies Blue Express INTL Ltda. y Blue Express S.A. The value of the sale of Blue INTL Ltda. and subsidiary was for ThUS$ 53,386.

The balances of Accounts receivable and accounts payable to related parties are disclosed in Note 9.

As of December 31, 2012 operations with common shareholders of TAM S.A. and Subsidiaries, are considered from the date of Business Combination, which is June 22, 2012.

c)Transactions with related parties for the period ended December 31, 2010

Explanation of other
Countryinformation about relatedNature of related partiesAmount of

Tax No.

Related party

Relationshipof originparties

transactions

Currencytransactions
ThUS$

96.810.370-9

Inversiones Costa

Verde Ltda. y CPA

Controlling
    shareholder
ChileInvestments

Leases as lessor

Revenue from services provided

CLP

CLP


77

13


96.847.880-K

Lufthansa Lan Technical

Training S.A.

AssociateChileTraining center

Leases as lessor

Cession of right

Services received

Services received

CLP
CLP
CLP
CLP

17

18

(16,356

(95,363


96.921.070-3

 

Austral Sociedad

Concesionaria S.A.

 Associate Chile Concessionaire Landing and other aviationServices received
rates receivedDistribution of dividends
 CLP
CLP
  

(196

73

(35
Basic consumptions receivedCLP(8
Aeronautical concession
received
CLP(153
Dividend distributionCLP73

87.752.000-5

 

Granja Marina

Tornagaleones S.A.

 Other related
    parties
 Chile Fish farming PassengerRevenue from services provided CLP  63  
Tornagaleones S.A.parties

96.669.520-K

 

Red de Televisión

Chilevisión S.A.

 Other related
    parties
 Chile Television Passenger

Revenue from services provided

Services received

 CLP
CLP
  

65

(100

  65
Chilevisión S.A.partiesPublicity services receivedCLP(100

96.894.180-1

 

Bancard Inversiones

 Other related
parties
 Chile Professional advice Professional adviceServices received CLP  (7

Foreign

 

Inversora Aeronáutica

Argentina

 Other related
    parties
 Argentina Investments Property rental granted

Leases as lessor

Commitments acquired on behalf of the entity

 US$
US$
  

(271

13

(271
ArgentinapartiesOther services providedUS$13

F-1-91

Compensation of key management


LOGO

c)Compensation of key management

The Company has defined for these purposes that key management personnel are the executives who define the Company’s policies and major guidelines and who directly affect the results of the business, considering the levels of vice-presidents, chief executivesVice-Presidents, Chief Executives and directors.Directors.

 

  For the periods ended 
  

For the year ended

December 31,

   December 31, 
  2011   2010   2012   2011   2010 
  ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$ 

Remuneration

   9,696     7,505     15,146     9,696     7,505  

Management fees

   185     150     653     185     150  

Corrections of value and non-monetary benefits

   665     352  

Non-monetary benefits

   395     665     352  

Short-term benefits

   5,011     4,680     5,060     5,011     4,680  

Share-based payments

   2,084     3,523     1,412     2,084     3,523  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   17,641     16,210     22,666     17,641     16,210  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

NOTE 36 –38 - SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

a)LATAM Airlines Group S.A. compensation plans.

The compensation plans implemented through the granting of options to subscribe and pay for shares, which have been granted since the last quarter of 2007, are shown in the consolidated statements of financial position in accordance with IFRS 2 “Share-based payments”, booking the effect of the grate date fair value of the options granted as a charge to remuneration on a straight-line basis between the date of granting the options and the date on which these become vested.

During the last quarter of 2009, the original terms of the plan were amended regarding subscription and payment of options. These modifications were carried out during the first quarter of 2010 and established a new term and exercise price.

The original grant and subsequent amendments have been formalized through the signing of option contracts for the subscription of shares according to the proportions shown in the accrual schedule, which are related to the permanence of the executive on those dates for exercising the options:

 

Percentage

  

Period

30%

  From October 29, 2010 until March 31, 2012

70%

  From October 30, 2011 until March 31, 2012

These options have been valued and booked at their fair value on the grant date, determined using the “Black-Scholes-Merton” method.

All options expireexpired on March 31, 2012.

 

   Number of share
options 

Stock options under a share-based payment agreement balance

Balance as of January 1, 2011

   2,209,091

Stock options granted

—  

Stock options annulled

—    

Stock options exercised

   (1,535,522
  

 

 

 

Stock options under a share-based payment agreementClosing balance as of December 31, 2011

   673,569  
  

 

 

 

F-1-92


LOGO

Entry data for option valuation model used for stock options granted during the year.

Weighted average
share price

  Exercise
price
   Expected
volatility
  Life of
option
   Dividends
expected
  Risk-free
interest
 

US$ 17.3

  US$ 14.5     33.20  1.9 years     50  0.0348  

NOTE 37 – THE ENVIRONMENT

In accordance with the General Environment Bases Law issued in Chile and its complementary regulations, there are no provisions that affect the operation of air transport services.

NOTE 38 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The consolidated financial statements of Lan Airlines S.A. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 have been approved in extraordinary session of the Board February 14, 2012, which was attended by the following directors:

1.Jorge Awad Mehech,

2.Darío Calderón González,

3.Juan José Cueto Plaza,

4.Juan José Cueto Sierra,

5.Ramón Eblen Kadis, and

6.Carlos Alberto Heller Solari.

Judgement against Variglog

On February 2, 2012, Variglog made a filing before the Brazilian court expressing that it was unable to abide by the terms of the judicial reorganization. Variglog shall therefore present a new plan which shall be approved or rejected by the creditors at a Meeting. Up to the date hereof, there is no a fixed date in which Variglog shall present the new plan.

Judgement against Matlin Patterson

On February 7, 2012, the Appellate Court of New York in a unanimous decision confirmed the judgment of the lower court in favor of AAI. With such decision, the staying effect ordered by the Appellate Court on July 28, 2011 ceases and AAI will reassume the procedure before the lower court for determination of damages. In principle, Matlin Patterson may not appeal to the decision of the Appelate Court unless it obtains a special permission from the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in the State.

Except as mentioned above, subsequent to December 31, 2011 until the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company has no knowledge of any other subsequent events that may significantly affect the balances or their interpretation.

F-1-93


LOGO

NOTE 39 – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

(a)Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

On November 26, 2010 Lan Pax Group S.A., a subsidiary of Lan Airlines S.A., acquired 98.942% of the Colombian company Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A.

This acquisition was made through the purchase of 100% of the shares of the Panamanian corporations AKEMI Holdings S.A. and SAIPAN Holding S.A., which owned the aforementioned percentage of AIRES S.A. The purchase price was ThUS$ 12,000.

Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A., founded in 1980, at the date of acquisition it was the second largest operator within the Colombian domestic market with a market share of 22%. AIRES S.A. offers regular service to 27 domestic destinations within Colombia as well as 3 international destinations. Synergies are expected between the combination of AIRES S.A. in the Colombian market and efficiency of the business model of LAN Airlines S.A. Additionally, better performance is expected by the business of Lan Airlines S.A. (passengers and cargo) through an increase in coverage in Latin America.

The Company has measured the non-controlling interest in AIRES S.A. using the proportionate share of the non-controlling interest in net identifiable assets acquired.

The business combination is recognized in the statement of financial position of Lan Airlines S.A. and Subsidiaries as goodwill of ThUS$ 94,224.

Summary statement of financial position at acquisition date:

   ThUS$     ThUS$ 

Current assets

   27,315   Current liabilities   125,193  

Non-current assets

   31,652   Non-current liabilities   20,327  
   Equity   (86,553
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   58,967   Total liabilities   58,967  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Controlling interest

   (82,224   

Goodwill determination:

ThUS$

Controlling interestBalance as of January 1, 2012

   82,224673,569  

Purchase priceStock options annulled

   12,000(91

Stock options exercised

(673,478) 
  

 

 

 

GoodwillClosing balance as of December 31, 2012

   94,224—    
  

 

 

 

Entry data for option valuation model used for stock options granted.

Weighted average

share price

 

Exercise

price

 

Expected

volatility

 

Life of

option

 

Dividends

expected

 

Risk-free

interest

US$ 17.3

 US$ 14.5 33.20% 1.9 years 50% 0.0348

 

(b)b)AEROASIS S.A.Subsidiaries compensation plans

Dated February 15, 2011, Lan Pax GroupTAM Linhas Aereas S.A. subsidiaryand Multiplus S.A., both subsidiaries of Lan AirlinesTAM S.A. acquired 100%, have outstanding stock options at December 31, 2012, which amounted to 972,344 shares and 891,261 shares, respectively.

TAM LinhasAéreas S.A

Description

 1stGrant  2ndGrant  3rdGrant  4thGrant  1stExtraordinary
Grant
  3rdExtraordinary
Grant
  4thExtraordinary
Grant
  Total 

Date

  12-28-2005    11-30-2006    12-14-2007    05-28-2010    09-27-2007    04-01-2010    01-04-2010   

Outstanding option number

  —      119,041    259,857    363,446    230,000    —      —      972,344  

Múltiplus S.A

Description

 1stGrant  2ndGrant  3rdGrant  4thGrant  1stExtraordinary
Grant
  2ndExtraordinary
Grant
  3rdExtraordinary
Grant
  Total 

Date

  10-04-2010    11-08-2010    04-16-2012    10-04-2010    10-04-2010    10-04-2010    04-16-2012   

Outstanding option number

  61,463    2,245    362,272    —       403,235    —      62,046    891,261  

The Options of Colombian society AEROASISTAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. The purchase price was ThUS$ 3,541.

AEROASIS S.A. is a corporation incorporated, under the lawsplan’s terms, are divided into three equal parts and employees can run a third of its options after three, four and five years respectively, as long as they remain employees of the Republiccompany. The agreed term of Colombia through Public Deed No. 1206 dated May 2, 2006.the options is seven years.

For Multiplus S.A., the plan’s terms provide that the options granted to the usual prizes are divided into three equal parts and employees may exercise one-third of their two, three and four, options respectively, as long as they keep being employees of the company. The agreed term of the options is seven years after the grant of the option. The first extraordinary granting was divided into two equal parts, and only half of the options may be exercised after three years and half after four years. The second extraordinary granting was also divided into two equal parts, which may be exercised after one and two years respectively.

Both companies have an option that contains a “service condition” in which the exercise of options depends exclusively on the delivery services by employees during a predetermined period. Terminated employees will be required to meet certain preconditions in order to maintain their right to the options.

The business combinationstate, in relation to the acquisition of the share’s rights, in both companies is recognized in the statement of financial position of Lan Airlines S.A. and Subsidiaries as goodwill of ThUS$ 6,736.

F-1-94


LOGO

Summary statement of financial position at acquisition date:

   ThUS$     ThUS$ 

Current assets

   1,802   Current liabilities   8,007  

Non-current assets

   3,010   Non-current liabilities   —    
   Equity   (3,195
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   4,812   Total liabilities & equity   4,812  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Controlling interest

   (3,195   

Goodwill determination:follows:

 

Company

Number of shares
Accrued options
   ThUS$Number of shares
Non accrued options
 

Controlling interestTAM Linhas Aéreas S.A

   3,195972,344—    

Purchase priceMúltiplus S.A

   3,541—    891,261

NOTE 39 - THE ENVIRONMENT

In 2010 the Group completed the creation of the Environmental Division of LAN Airlines S.A., whose structure has allowed it to manage environmental issues inside the Company on a global level over the last two years. The main objective of this department is to implement a management system and environmental programs that meet the increasingly demanding requirements globally and with it, position the Company as an industry leader in global environmental issues.

One of the functions of the Environmental Division is to develop, in conjunction with the various areas of the Company, continuous improvement programs in their internal processes that generate environmental benefits and to complement those programs currently in process.

The main initiatives in 2012 on environmental issues were as follow:

Chile:

Implementation of the first commercial flight within South America with Biofuel used cooking oil;

Studies and external audits and environmental issues, particularly in diagnostics and updating environmental compliances.

Peru:

Measurement and external Verification of Carbon Footprint in LAN Perú S.A.

Purchase carbon credits in the amount of US$ 49,000 to offset the emissions of our operations on the ground.

Ecuador:

Starting the implementation of an environmental management system project for our operations at the new airport in Quito.

USA:

Starting the implementation of an environmental management system project for our cargo operation in Miami.

During 2012 the expenses incurred by the Environmental Division was US$ 526,074.

NOTE 40 – EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.Devaluation in Venezuela:

On February 8, 2013, Exchange Arrangement N°14 was published in theOfficial Gazette of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela according to which effective February 9, 2013, the exchange rate was set at 6.30 bolivars per US$1. Until that date, the exchange rate was 4.30 bolivars per US$1.

Article 9 of the same Arrangement added that foreign currency sale transactions corresponding to applications that had been marked received by the Foreign Currency Administration Commission as of February 8, 2013 for, among other purposes, international passenger, cargo and mail air carriage duly licensed by the National Executive Branch, will be settled using the exchange rate of 4.30 bolivars per US$1.

2.Suspension of the B787 Fleet Operation:

On January 16, 2013, All Nippon Airways and Japan Airlines suspended their Boeing 787 operations because of recent occurrences with the battery systems of those aircraft. On the same date, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) instructed the Boeing 787 operators in the United States of America to suspend their flights until inspections and actions were taken regarding the battery system.

Therefore, in coordination with the Chilean Civil Aviation Board (“DGAC”), the Company decided to suspend its Boeing 787 operations until further notice.

Boeing has been working on resolving the problems that led to the suspension of the Boeing 787 fleet.

On April 19, 2013, LATAM announced that given the approval of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States (FAA) of Boeing’s design for modifications to the 787 battery system, the technical teams of the Company are planning the implementation of the actions required by the manufacturer’s plan.

LATAM will work with Boeing to implement these modifications, which includes a design for modifications to the 787 battery system.

According to the FAA, next week they will issue instructions to operators for making changes to the aircraft and will publish in the Federal Register the final directive that will allow the 787 to return to service with the battery system modifications.

During this process – in which LATAM has worked in coordination with the DGAC, LATAM maintained its committed to the highest safety standards and the areas of the company involved in the operation of the 787 were trained for over three years specifically for the delivery and operation of the aircraft.

LATAM 787 fleet performed without incidents during the months it operated, and suspended flights on that aircraft type in compliance with the recommendation of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States (FAA).

3.Employee Compensation Plan for the Company and its subsidiaries:

At a Special Shareholders Meeting held December 21, 2011, the Company’s shareholders approved, among other matters, an increase in its capital by US$1,465,372,970.09 through the issuance of 147,355,882 common shares with no par value. US$47,733,352.49 of that increase, corresponding to the issuance of 4,800,000 shares, would be allocated to compensation plans for employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, pursuant to Article 24 of the Companies Law.

The main conditions for these compensation plans are:

a)Upon a recommendation by the Company’s Executive Committee, the Board will determine the employees of the Company and its subsidiaries included in the Compensation Plan and the number of options for the acquisition of shares in the Company that will be allocated to each, after which a stock option agreement will be signed with each employee.

b)Until the shares in the option are subscribed, the optionee will have no economic or political rights and will not be considered in the quorum for shareholders meetings.

c)The options allocated to each employee will accrue in parts on the following three dates: 1) 30% on December 21, 2014: (2) 30% on December 21, 2015 and (3) 40% on June 21, 2016, subject to remaining in the company’s employ.

d)The price payable for each share allocated to the Compensation Plan, if the options are exercised, will be CLP$11,000. It will be calculated, adjusted and payable in the manner indicated in letter h) below.

e)Once the options accrue, in the aforesaid parts, the employee may exercise them in whole or in part, in which case he must subscribe and pay for the respective shares at once, in the act of subscription, in cash, by check, by bank check, by electronic fund transfer or any other instrument or paper representing money payable on demand. Partial exercise may be for no less than 10% of all options held by the Employee.

f)The period during which the employee must exercise the options after they have accrued according to letter c) above will expire December 21, 2016. If the employee has not exercised or waived the options in that period, he will be understood, for all purposes, to have waived the options and, accordingly, all rights, powers, promises or offers in relation to the subscription of cash shares in the Company will be deemed extinguished and it will be understood that the employee has irrevocably waived any right or power in relation thereto. The Company will be released from any obligation.

g)If the employee resigns from his position or his employment contract is terminated for any reason other than the reasons contained in article 160 of the Labor Code, only the options accrued through the date of termination of the employment contract may be exercised, always provided the period for exercise of the options is in force.

The employee will also forfeit the right to exercise the options, whether or not they have accrued, if he is severed for any of the reasons contained in article 160 of the Labor Code.

The heirs or legatees of the employee shall exercise the rights and fulfill the obligations in substitution for the employee should he die, and the above provisions in this letter shall consequently not apply. In that case, all of the options granted shall accrue automatically and the heirs or legatees must exercise them within 180 calendar days after the date of the employee’s death. The employee shall retain his rights to the options in the event of a permanent disability and may exercise them in the periods indicated above.

h)The price payable for these shares, if the respective options are exercised, will be expressed in Dollars of the United States of America (“Dollars”), for the equivalent in that currency to the Placement Price indicated in letter d) above on the date when the Company’s Board of Directors sets it (the “Pricing Date”), converted at the observed dollar exchange rate published in theOfficial Gazette on the Pricing Date. As of the Pricing Date, said price expressed in Dollars will be adjusted by the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) published monthly by the U.S. Department of Labor, from the Pricing Date to the date of subscription and payment of the shares. The subscription price shall be paid in pesos, local currency, converted at the observed dollar exchange rate published in theOfficial Gazette on the date of subscription and payment of the shares.

i)The options may not be assigned, liened or transferred in any way by the employee. However, the employee may state his waiver of the options at any time by sending a certified letter of waiver to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

4.Decision on Global Alliance:

On March 7, 2013, the Company informed the Securities and Insurance Commission of the following material event:

a)In Decision N° 37 dated September 21, 2011 (the “Decision”), the Antitrust Court (“TDLC”) approved the concentration transaction between LAN Airlines S.A. (now called LATAM Airlines Group S.A.) and TAM Linhas Aereas S.A., subject to fulfillment of the conditions stipulated in that Decision.

b)The sixth condition imposed by the TDLC’s Decision requires that “LATAM resign from at least one of the two global alliances in which the parties to this Transaction, LAN and TAM, are members, in the period of 24 months as from the date of consummation of the Transaction.”

c)TheConselho Administrativo de Defesa Economica(the Administrative Economic Defense Council, or CADE) of Brazil approved the merger of TAM S.A. and LAN Airlines S.A. by resolution issued December 14, 2011, which was partially amended on February 8, 2012, subject to fulfillment of the conditions stipulated in said resolution. One of those definitive conditions was that the petitioners, namely LAN Airlines S.A. and TAM S.A., submit the choice of the global alliance in which they will participate to approval by CADE in the period of 22 months after consummation of the concentration transaction, i.e., as from June 22, 2012.

d)In order to fulfill the aforesaid conditions imposed by each of TDLC and CADE, the Board of Directors of LATAM Airlines Group resolved, at a regular Board meeting held March 5, 2013, to choose oneworld as its global alliance for the airlines in its group. As a result, TAM Linhas Aereas S.A. (“TAM”) and Aerovias de Integracion Regional-Aires S.A. (“Lan Colombia”) will join oneworld in which LATAM Airlines Group and 13 others are already members.

e)In the opinion of the Board of LATAM Airlines Group, this global alliance is the one best suited to the company’s interests and has the most synergies with LATAM Airlines Group. It also offers the best benefits, more connectivity and products for our passengers.

f)TAM’s Board also resolved to resign from TAM’s membership in the Star Alliance global alliance, which will take effect in the second quarter of 2014, on a date to be disclosed during 2013.

g)TAM is expected to officially join oneworld during the second quarter of 2014, as soon as it leaves Star Alliance. That date will also be announced this year.

h)LAN Colombia is expected to join oneworld in the fourth quarter of 2013.

i)Finally, this decision by the Board of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. will be presented in due course to CADE, according to the terms of its aforesaid resolution and to applicable procedure.

5.Covenants of TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.:

Our subsidiary, TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., has set limits on some of its financial indicators in relation to the issuance of debentures (CVM 476) in 2009 for an original amount of ThR $600,000. Anticipating a potential declaration of default on those limits at the close of December 2012, TAM Linheas Aéreas S.A. requested a waiver by the General Debenture Holder Assembly and according to IFRS accounting standards, the financial liabilities relating to this debenture issue are classified as a current financial liability. On February 14, 2013, the General Debenture Holder Assembly granted that waiver, so this obligation will be classified as current and non-current financial liabilities in the future financial statements.

6.Placement of remainder in the exchange of shares:

On September 4, 2012, the Company held a special shareholders meeting convened by its Board of Directors on August 3, 2012. At that meeting, shareholders decided, among other matters, that the remainder of 7,436,816 shares in LATAM out of a total of 142,555,882 shares issued under authorization of the Special Shareholders Meeting held December 21, 2011 that were not exchanged for shares in Sister Holdco S.A. and Holdco II S.A. be allocated to a preemptive offer among LATAM shareholders according to article 25 of the Companies Law, and that any unsubscribed balance be placed on the market.

Placement of these shares was approved by the Securities and Insurance Commission on December 11, 2012. On December 20, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors agreed to begin the right of first refusal period for such shares effective December 21, 2012 and to set the placement price at CLP$11,000 per share, all of which was informed to the Securities and Insurance Commission by a disclosure on the same date. At the end of that right of first refusal period, i.e., on January 19, 2013, 6,857,190 shares of that remainder had been subscribed and paid, leaving a balance of 579,626 unsubscribed shares. That balance was auctioned on the Santiago Stock Exchange, Securities Exchange, on January 23, 2013 at a price of CLP$11,921 per share.

The Consolidated Financial Statements of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Subsidiaries as December 31, 2012 were approved at Board of Directors Meeting held April 30, 2013.

NOTE 41 - CONSOLIDATION SCHEDULE

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

   LATAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
   TAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
   TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
   TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
   Consolidation
adjustments
  Consolidated 
   

As of

December 31,
2012

   

As of

December 31,
2012

   

As of

December 31,
2012

   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Assets

            

Current assets

            

Cash and cash equivalents

   231,930     69     3,797     166,755    169,686     78,026    650,263  

Other financial assets

   77,796     2,588     —       115,966    959,277     (519,084  636,543  

Other non-financial assets

   22,058     206     —       136,011    11,986     (437  169,824  

Trade and other accounts receivable

   400,057     7,411     —       644,190    382,123     (7,451  1,426,330  

Accounts receivable from related entities

   227,465     —       —       52,640    677,723     (942,641  15,187  

Inventories

   93,788     —       —       77,100    10,395     —      181,283  

Tax assets

   32,250     19,786     —       92,544    81,728     (5,779  220,529  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets other than non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale

   1,085,344     30,060     3,797     1,285,206    2,292,918     (1,397,366  3,299,959  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale

   35,874     —       —       1,155    10,626     —      47,655  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   1,121,218     30,060     3,797     1,286,361    2,303,544     (1,397,366  3,347,614  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current assets

            

Other financial assets

   4,053,652     —       —       30,860    523,199     (4,533,616  74,095  

Other non-financial assets

   32,606     445     —       208,634    2,219     1    243,905  

Accounts receivable

   16,485     —       —       5,989    28,138     —      50,612  

Accounts receivable from related parties

   122,219     89     141,667     73,044    1,169,225     (1,506,244  —    

Equity accounted investments

   1,619     184,324     —       (260,355  2,139     76,030    3,757  

Intangible assets other than goodwill

   83,036     —       —       1,650,379    115,178     —      1,848,593  

Goodwill

   —       —       —       —      —       2,948,462    2,948,462  

Property, plant and equipment

   6,578,377     57     —       4,100,525    1,136,448     (17,518  11,797,889  

Current tax assets, long term portion

   27,150     —       —       466    45,900     —      73,516  

Deferred tax assets

   —       36,639     —       288,193    107,983     (288,186  144,629  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

   10,915,144     221,554     141,667     6,097,735    3,130,429     (3,321,071  17,185,458  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   12,036,362     251,614     145,464     7,384,096    5,433,973     (4,718,437  20,533,072  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

   LATAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
  TAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
  TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
  TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
   Consolidation
adjustments
  Consolidated 
   

As of

December 31,
2012

  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Liabilities and shareholder’s equity

         

Current liabilities

         

Other financial liabilities

   746,536    —      3,318    1,096,140    199,499     1,837    2,047,330  

Trade and other accounts payable

   288,068    2,689    —      748,782    613,437     (21  1,652,955  

Accounts payable to related parties

   221,788    690    —      48,619    670,238     (941,061  274  

Other provisions

   6,814    —      —      14,320    585     —      21,719  

Tax liabilities

   28,254    8,222    —      44,970    39,813     (5,778  115,481  

Other non-financial liabilities

   963,878    424    —      371,175    614,503     (7,450  1,942,530  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   2,255,338    12,025    3,318    2,324,006    2,138,075     (952,473  5,780,289  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

         

Other financial liabilities

   3,755,622    —      297,746    2,214,639    1,432,688     (1,838  7,698,857  

Accounts payable

   40,680    —      —      477,104    213,451     —      731,235  

Accounts payable to related parties

   345,790    —      —      803,970    348,515     (1,498,275  —    

Other provisions

   45,302    140    —      416,421    20,282     (37,016  445,129  

Deferred tax liabilities

   437,399    —      —      347,366    92,483     (288,189  589,059  

Employee benefits

   5,777    —      —      —      12,589     —      18,366  

Other non-financial liabilities

   —      —      —      101,020    301     —      101,321  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   4,630,570    140    297,746    4,360,520    2,120,309     (1,825,318  9,583,967  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   6,885,908    12,165    301,064    6,684,526    4,258,384     (2,777,791  15,364,256  

Equity

         

Share capital

   1,501,018    406,542    43    493,821    735,302     (1,635,708  1,501,018  

Retained earnings

   1,124,421    (758,203  (155,643  (816,484  115,497     1,596,580    1,106,168  

Share premium

   —      36,676    —      —      299,692     (336,368  —    

Treasury shares

   (203  —      —      —      —       —      (203

Other reserves

   2,525,218    554,434    —      1,022,233    25,098     (1,591,883  2,535,100  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Parent’s ownership interest

   5,150,454    239,449    (155,600  699,570    1,175,589     (1,967,379  5,142,083  

Non-controlling interest

   —      —      —      —      —       26,733    26,733  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   5,150,454    239,449    (155,600  699,570    1,175,589     (1,940,646  5,168,816  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   12,036,362    251,614    145,464    7,384,096    5,433,973     (4,718,437  20,533,072  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME BY FUNCTION

  LATAM S.A.
(parent company)
  TAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
  TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
  TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
  Consolidation
adjustments
  Consolidated 
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Revenue

  3,209,219    —      —      3,550,819    3,592,188    (630,037  9,722,189  

Cost of sales

  (2,767,417  14    —      (2,975,193  (3,138,077  1,238,030    (7,642,643
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

  441,802    14    —      575,626    454,111    607,993    2,079,546  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other income

  654,901    —      —      18,560    621,300    (1,074,605  220,156  

Distribution costs

  (345,730  —      —      (221,468  (338,137  101,716    (803,619

Administrative expenses

  (266,781  (26,300  —      (393,128  (595,504  412,209    (869,504

Other expenses

  (85,787  (1,095  (3  (46,967  (126,532  (51,369  (311,753

Other gains/(losses)

  (27,026  9    —      17,019    (32,713  3,961    (38,750

Financial income

  16,144    1,939    510    34,977    34,258    (10,339  77,489  

Financial costs

  (128,586  (245  (11,401  (88,609  (76,522  10,765    (294,598

associated companies

  972    —      —      —      —      —      972  

Exchange differences

  11,233    —      (1,259  50,671    6,040    —      66,685  

Result for readjustable units

  15    —      —      —      294    (331  (22
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before taxes

  271,157    (25,678  (12,153  (53,319  (53,405  —      126,602  

Income tax expense

  (112,687  17,796    —      5,473    (12,794  —      (102,212
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME FOR THE PERIOD

  158,470    (7,882  (12,153  (47,846  (66,199  —      24,390  

Income attributable to owners of the parent

  158,470    (7,882  (12,153  (48,423  (79,056  —      10,956  

Income attributable to non-controlling

  —      —      —      577    12,857    —      13,434  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

  158,470    (7,882  (12,153  (47,846  (66,199  —      24,390  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DIRECT – METHOD

  LATAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
  TAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
  TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
  TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
  Consolidation
adjustments
  Consolidated 
  

As of

December 31,

2012

  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Cash flows from (used in) operating activities

       

Receipts from sales of goods and services

  5,104,044    16    —      3,820,407    5,145,942    (3,811,936  10,258,473  

Cash receipts from royalties, fees, commissions and other revenue

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Receipts from contracts held for purposes of dealing or trading

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Receipts from premiums and claims, annuities and other policy benefits underwritten

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Other receipts from operating activities

  60,484    —      —      —      7,615    (10,336  57,763  

Classes receipts from operating activities

  5,164,528    16    —      3,820,407    5,153,557    (3,822,272  10,316,236  

Payments to suppliers for the supply of goods and services

  (3,998,995  (51,160  —      (2,510,889  (4,109,867  3,517,046    (7,153,865

Payments from contracts held for dealing or trading

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Payments to and on behalf of employees

  (407,991  1,037    —      (798,466  (1,006,146  272,797    (1,938,769

Payments for premiums and claims, annuities and other policy benefits derived

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Other payments for operating activities

  —      —      —      —      (29,732  10,407    (19,325

Dividends Paid

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Dividends received

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Interest paid

  (2,371  —      (10,969  —      (907  14,247    —    

Interest received

  11,772     —      6,812    25,856    8,546    52,986  

Income taxes refunded (paid)

  (3,641  (2,832  —      61,564    (46,268  (11,841  (3,018

Other inflows (outflows) of cash

  19,823    (795  (4  (76,384  (17,303  24,230    (50,433
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Types of payments

  (4,381,403  (53,750  (10,973  (3,317,363  (5,184,367  3,835,432    (9,112,424
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities

  783,125    (53,734  (10,973  503,044    (30,810  13,160    1,203,812  

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Cash flows from losing control of subsidiaries or other businesses

  —      —      —      —      400    (400  —    

Cash flows used to obtain control of subsidiaries or other businesses

  —      —      —      —      (176,238  173,015    (3,223

Cash flows used in the purchase of non-controlling

  —      —      —      —      (89  89   

Other cash receipts from sales of equity or debt instruments of other entities

  30,928    153,179    —      132,738    69,533    1    386,379  

Other cash payments to acquire equity or debt instruments of other entities

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Other proceeds from the sale of interests in joint ventures

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Other payments to acquire interests in joint ventures

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Loans to related parties

  (234,535  —      —      (55,000  (50,701  340,236    —    

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

  29,134    (106  —      23,035    21,237    129    73,429  

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

  (2,310,381  (2,891  —      (97,905  16,081    5,732    (2,389,364

Proceeds from sales of intangible assets

  —      —      —      —       —      —    

Purchases of intangible assets

  (25,275  —      —      (22,034  (11,857  —      (59,166

Proceeds from other long-term assets

  13,940    —      —      —      24,095    —      38,035  

Purchases of other long-term assets

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Proceeds from government grants

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Cash advances and loans to third

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Proceeds from repayment of advances and loans to third

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Payments arising from contracts of futures, forwards, options and swaps

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Cash receipts from futures contracts, forward, options and swap

  —      —      —      606    —      (606  —    

Proceeds from related parties

  65,969    —      —      —      33,611    (99,580  —    

Dividends received

  34,848    114,433    —      —      8,742    (157,672  351  

Interest received

  6,031    —      —      —      20,368    (26,399  —    

Income taxes refunded (paid)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Other inflows (outflows) of cash

  —      —      —      (69,761  507    96,397    27,143  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities

  (2,389,341  264,615    —      (88,321  (44,311  330,942    (1,926,416
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DIRECT – METHOD

   LATAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
  TAM S.A.
(parent company
and guarantor)
  TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
  TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
  Consolidation
adjustments
  Consolidiated 
   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities

        

Proceeds from issue of shares

   79,212    —      —      —      192,406    188,106    83,512  

Proceeds from issuance of other equity instruments

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Payments to acquire or redeem the entity’s shares

   (203  (167,589  —      —      (11,900  179,489    (203

Payments for other equity interests

   —      (54,808  —      —      —      54,808    —    

Proceeds from term loans

   2,044,463    —      —      —      141,200    —      2,185,663  

Proceeds from short term loans

   152,000    —      —      —      —      —      152,000  

Total proceeds of loans

   2,196,463    —      —      —      141,200    —      2,337,663  

Loans from related parties

   55,000    —      —      18,930    256,867    (330,797  —    

Repayment of loans

   (260,737  —      —      (38,749  (239,846  —      (539,332

Payments of finance lease liabilities

   (58,177  —      —      (194,634  (40,120  —      (292,931

Repayment of loans to related parties

   (30,925  —      —      —      (68,654  99,579    —    

Proceeds from government grants

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Dividends Paid

   (103,503  —      —      (60,720  (118,266  157,662    (124,827

Interest paid

   (102,005  —      —      (53,224  (69,798  (2,580  (227,607

Income taxes refunded (paid)

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Other inflows (outflows) of cash

   (181,985  —      —      44,778    (32,739  (61,133  (231,079
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities

   1,593,140    (222,397  —      (283,619  9,150    (91,078  1,005,196  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in E. and E. E., before the effect of exchange rate

   (13,076  (11,516  (10,973  131,104    (65,971  253,024    282,592  

Effects of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents

   —      7,215    199    (24,892  18,001    (7,259  (6,736

Effects of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents

   —      7,215    199    (24,892  18,001    (7,259  (6,736
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (13,076  (4,301  (10,774  106,212    (47,970  245,765    275,856  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   245,006    4,369    14,572    60,543    217,657    (167,740  374,407  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   231,930    68    3,798    166,755    169,687    78,025    650,263  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 41 - CONSOLIDATION SCHEDULE

In accordance with SEC rule SX 3-10 the Company is presenting consolidation schedules as Senior Notes issued by TAM Capital (issuer), a 100% subsidiary of TAM S.A., in 2007 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by TAM S.A. (guarantor) and by TAM Linhas Aéreas (guarantor) which is also a 100% subsidiary of TAM S.A. The consolidation schedules separately present the financial information for LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (parent company), TAM S.A. (guarantor), TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. (guarantor) and other consolidated subsidiaries of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (non-guarantors).

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

   LATAM S.A.
(parent company)
   TAM S.A.
(guarantor)
   TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
   TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
   Other
(non-guarantor)
   Consolidating
adjustments
  Consolidated 
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Assets

             

Current assets

             

Cash and cash equivalents

   231,930     69     3,797     166,755     169,686     78,026    650,263  

Other financial assets

   77,796     2,588     —       115,966     963,537     (523,344  636,543  

Other non-financial assets

   21,693     206     —       136,011     11,986     (72  169,824  

Trade and other accounts receivable

   400,057     7,411     —       644,190     382,123     (7,451  1,426,330  

Accounts receivable from related entities

   227,465     —       —       52,640     677,723     (942,641  15,187  

Inventories

   93,788     —       —       77,100     10,395     —      181,283  

Tax assets

   32,250     19,786     —       92,544     81,728     (5,779  220,529  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets other than non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale

   1,084,979     30,060     3,797     1,285,206     2,297,178     (1,401,261  3,299,959  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale

   35,874     —       —       1,155     10,626     —      47,655  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   1,120,853     30,060     3,797     1,286,361     2,307,804     (1,401,261  3,347,614  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current assets

             

Other financial assets

   15,499     —       —       30,860     33,771     (6,035  74,095  

Other non-financial assets

   32,606     445     —       208,634     2,219     1    243,905  

Accounts receivable

   16,485     —       —       5,989     28,138     —      50,612  

Accounts receivable from related parties

   122,219     89     141,667     73,044     1,169,225     (1,506,244  —    

Equity accounted investments

   1,318,477     184,324     —       54,677     356,969     (1,910,690  3,757  

Intangible assets other than goodwill

   83,036     —       —       1,650,379     115,178     —      1,848,593  

Goodwill

   2,813,864     —       —       —       134,598     —      2,948,462  

Property, plant and equipment

   6,560,859     57     —       4,100,525     1,136,448     —      11,797,889  

Current tax assets, long term portion

   27,150     —       —       466     45,900     —      73,516  

Deferred tax assets

   —       36,639     —       288,193     107,983     (288,186  144,629  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

   10,990,195     221,554     141,667     6,412,767     3,130,429     (3,711,154  17,185,458  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   12,111,048     251,614     145,464     7,699,128     5,438,233     (5,112,415  20,533,072  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

   LATAM S.A.
(parent company)
  TAM S.A.
(guarantor)
  TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
  TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
   Consolidating
adjustments
  Consolidated 
   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
   ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$   ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Liabilities and shareholder’s equity

         

Current liabilities

         

Other financial liabilities

   746,536    —      3,318    1,096,140    199,499     1,837    2,047,330  

Trade and other accounts payable

   288,068    2,689    —      748,782    613,437     (21  1,652,955  

Accounts payable to related parties

   221,788    690    —      48,619    670,238     (941,061  274  

Other provisions

   6,814    —      —      14,320    585     —      21,719  

Tax liabilities

   28,254    8,222    —      44,970    39,813     (5,778  115,481  

Other non-financial liabilities

   963,878    424    —      371,175    614,503     (7,450  1,942,530  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   2,255,338    12,025    3,318    2,324,006    2,138,075     (952,473  5,780,289  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

         

Other financial liabilities

   3,755,622    —      297,746    2,214,639    1,432,688     (1,838  7,698,857  

Accounts payable

   40,680    —      —      477,104    213,451     —      731,235  

Accounts payable to related parties

   345,790    —      —      803,970    344,255     (1,494,015  —    

Provision for losses on investments

   113,039    —      —      315,032    11,294     (439,365  —    

Other provisions

   15,320    140    —      416,421    13,248     —      445,129  

Deferred tax liabilities

   437,399    —      —      347,366    92,483     (288,189  589,059  

Employee benefits

   5,777    —      —      —      12,589     —      18,366  

Other non-financial liabilities

   —      —      —      101,020    301     —      101,321  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   4,713,627    140    297,746    4,675,552    2,120,309     (2,223,407  9,583,967  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   6,968,965    12,165    301,064    6,999,558    4,258,384     (3,175,880  15,364,256  

Equity

         

Share capital

   1,501,018    406,542    43    493,821    735,302     (1,635,708  1,501,018  

Retained earnings

   1,106,168    (758,203  (155,643  (816,484  119,757     1,610,573    1,106,168  

Share premium

   —      36,676    —      —      299,692     (336,368  —    

Treasury shares

   (203  —      —      —      —       —      (203

Other reserves

   2,535,100    554,434    —      1,022,233    25,098     (1,601,765  2,535,100  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Parent’s ownership interest

   5,142,083    239,449    (155,600  699,570    1,179,849     (1,963,268  5,142,083  

Non-controlling interest

   —      —      —      —      —       26,733    26,733  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   5,142,083    239,449    (155,600  699,570    1,179,849     (1,936,535  5,168,816  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   12,111,048    251,614    145,464    7,699,128    5,438,233     (5,112,415  20,533,072  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME BY FUNCTION

  LATAM S.A.
(parent company)
  TAM S.A.
(guarantor)
  TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
  TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
  Consolidating
adjustments
  Consolidated 
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$  ThUS$ 

Revenue

  3,209,219    —      —      3,550,819    3,592,188    (630,037  9,722,189  

Cost of sales

  (2,767,417  14    —      (2,975,193  (3,138,077  1,238,030    (7,642,643
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

  441,802    14    —      575,626    454,111    607,993    2,079,546  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other income

  654,901    —      —      18,560    621,300    (1,074,605  220,156  

Distribution costs

  (345,730  —      —      (221,468  (338,137  101,716    (803,619

Administrative expenses

  (266,781  (26,300  —      (393,128  (595,504  412,209    (869,504

Other expenses

  (85,788  (1,095  (3  (46,967  (126,532  (51,368  (311,753

Other gains/(losses)

  (27,026  9    —      17,019    (32,713  3,961    (38,750

Financial income

  16,144    1,939    510    34,977    34,258    (10,339  77,489  

Financial costs

  (128,586  (245  (11,401  (88,609  (76,522  10,765    (294,598

Equity accounted investments

  (147,513  (37,280  —      22,719    —      162,074    —    

Revenue and losses from associated companies

  972    —      —      —      —      —      972  

Exchange differences

  11,233    —      (1,259  50,671    6,040    —      66,685  

Resut for readjustable units

  15    —      —      —      294    (331  (22
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before taxes

  123,643    (62,958  (12,153  (30,600  (53,405  162,075    126,602  

Income tax expense

  (112,687  17,796    —      5,473    (12,794  —      (102,212
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME FOR THE PERIOD

  10,956    (45,162  (12,153  (25,127  (66,199  162,075    24,390  

Income attributable to owners of the parent

  10,956    (45,162  (12,153  (25,127  (79,633  162,075    10,956  

Income attributable to non-controlling

  —      —      —      —      13,434    —      13,434  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

  10,956    (45,162  (12,153  (25,127  (66,199  162,075    24,390  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  30,400    (57,140  (12,154  (31,134  (69,068  174,311    35,215  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to owners of the parent

  30,400    (57,140  (12,154  (31,134  (76,610  174,311    27,673  

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest

  —      —      —      —      7,542    —      7,542  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  30,400    (57,140  (12,154  (31,134  (69,068  174,311    35,215  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DIRECT – METHOD

   LATAM S.A.
(parent
company)
  TAM S.A.
(guarantor)
  TAM Capital
(subsidiary issuer)
  TAM Linhas
Aéreas S.A.
(guarantor)
  Other
(non-guarantor)
  Consolidating
adjustments
  Consolidated 
   As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2012
 
   ThUS $  ThUS $  ThUS $  ThUS $  ThUS $  ThUS $  ThUS $ 

Cash flows from operating activities

        

Receipts from sales of goods and services

   5,104,044    —      —      3,820,407    5,145,942    (3,811,920  10,258,473  

Other receipts from operating activities

   60,484    —      —      —      7,615    (10,336  57,763  

Payments to suppliers for the supply of goods and services

   (3,998,995  (53,113  —      (2,506,305  (4,414,719  3,819,267    (7,153,865

Payments to and on behalf of employees

   (407,991  (5,720  —      (798,466  (701,294  (25,298  (1,938,769

Other payments for operating activities

   —      —      —      —      (29,732  10,407    (19,325

Interest paid

   (2,371  —      (10,969  —      (907  14,247    —    

Interest received

   11,772    1,953    —      6,812    25,856    6,593    52,986  

Income taxes refunded (paid)

   (3,641  2,360    —      61,564    (46,268  (17,033  (3,018

Other inflows (outflows) of cash

   19,823    7,171    (4  (76,384  (17,303  16,264    (50,433
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flows from operating activities

   783,125    (47,349  (10,973  507,628    (30,810  2,191    1,203,812  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities

        

Cash flows from losing control of subsidiaries or other businesses

   —      —      —      —      400    (400  —    

Cash flows used to obtain control of subsidiaries or other businesses

   —      —      —      —      (176,238  173,015    (3,223

Cash flows used in the purchase of non-controlling

   —      —      —      —      (89  89   

Other cash receipts from sales of equity or debt instruments of other entities

   30,928    153,179    —      132,738    69,533    1    386,379  

Loans to related parties

   (234,535  —      —      (55,000  (50,701  340,236    —    

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

   29,134    —      —      23,035    21,237    24    73,429  

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

   (2,310,381  (2,916  —      (97,905  16,081    5,757    (2,389,364

Purchases of intangible asset

   (25,275  —      ��      (22,034  (11,857  —      (59,166

Proceeds from other long-term assets

   13,940    —      —      —      24,095    —      38,035  

Cash receipts from futures contracts, forward, options and swap

   —      —      —      606    —      (606  —    

Proceeds from related parties

   65,969    —      —      —      33,611    (99,580  —    

Dividends received

   34,848    114,433    —      —      8,742    (157,672  351  

Interest received

   6,031    —      —      —      20,368    (26,399  —    

Other inflows (outflows) of cash

   —      —      —      (69,761  507    96,397    27,143  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flows from investing activities

   (2,389,341  264,696    —      (88,321  (44,311  330,862    (1,926,416
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities

        

Proceeds from issue of shares

   79,212    —      —      —      192,406    (188,106  83,512  

Payments to acquire or redeem the entity’s shares

   (203  (167,589  —      —      (11,900  179,489    (203

Payments for other equity interests

   —      (54,808  —      —      —      54,808    —    

Proceeds from term loans

   2,044,463    —      —      —      141,200    —      2,185,663  

Proceeds from short term loans

   152,000    —      —      —      —      —      152,000  

Loans from related parties

   55,000    —      —      18,930    256,867    (330,797  —    

Repayment of loans

   (260,737  —      —      (38,749  (239,846  —      (539,332

Payments of finance lease liabilities

   (58,177  —      —      (194,634  (40,120  —      (292,931

Repayment of loans to related parties

   (30,925  —      —      —      (68,654  99,579    —    

Dividends Paid

   (103,503  —      —      (60,720  (118,266  157,662    (124,827

Interest paid

   (102,005  —      —      (53,224  (69,798  (2,580  (227,607

Other inflows (outflows) of cash

   (181,985  —      —      44,778    (32,739  (61,133  (231,079
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities

   1,593,140    (222,397  —      (283,619  9,150    (91,078  1,005,196  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in, cash and cash a quivalents before effect of exchange rate

   (13,076  (5,050  (10,973  135,688    (65,971  241,975    282,592  

Effects of variation in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents

   —      750    198    (29,476  18,000    3,796    (6,736
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (13,076  (4,300  (10,775  106,212    (47,971  245,771    275,856  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

   245,006    4,369    14,572    60,543    217,657    (167,740  374,407  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

   231,930    69    3,797    166,755    169,686    78,031    650,263  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Latam Airlines Group S.A. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 15 of this annual report. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

LOGO

F-193


LOGO

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

Santiago, Chile
April 30, 2013

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

April 30, 2013LATAM Airlines Group S.A.
 

Goodwill

 6,736By 

/s/ Alejandro de la Fuente Goic

 Name:Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
Title:Chief Financial Officer


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
No.

  

Description

1.1*Amended By-laws of LATAM Airlines Group S.A.
2.1Second Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2011, between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
2.3Indenture, dated as of April 25, 2007, among TAM Capital Inc., Tam S.A., TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A., incorporated herein by reference from our second pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-4, File No. 333-131938.
2.4Indenture, dated as of October 29, 2009, among TAM Capital 2 Inc., TAM S.A., TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., The Bank of New York Mellon and The Bank of New York Mellon (Luxembourg) S.A., incorporated herein by reference from our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 on Form 20-F, filed June 30, 2010, File. No. 333-131938.
4.1Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement, dated March 20, 1998, between the Company and Airbus Industry relating to Airbus A320-Family Aircraft (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 24, 2001 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.1.1Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 14, 2003 and Amendment No. 2 dated as of October 4, 2005, to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (as successor to Airbus Industry) (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 30, 2006 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.1.2Amendment No. 3 dated as of March 6, 2007, to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 30, 2006 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.1.3Amendment No. 5 dated as of December 23, 2009, to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 29, 2010 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.1.4Amendments No. 6, 7, 8 and 9 (dated as of May 10, 2010, May 19, 2010, September 23, 2010 and December 21, 2010, respectively), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.1.5Amendments No. 10 and 11 (dated as of June 10, 2011 and November 8, 2011, respectively), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.1.6*Amendments No. 12 (dated as of November 19, 2012), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. Portions of these documents have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.2Purchase Agreement No. 2126 dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company as amended and supplemented, relating to Model 767-316ER, Model 767-38EF, and Model 767-316F Aircraft (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on December 21, 2004 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.2.1Supplemental Agreements No. 16, 19, 20, 21 and 22 (dated as of November 11, 2004, January 21, March 10, April 1, April 28, and July 20, 2005, and March 31, 2006, respectively) to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126 dated January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company, relating to Model 767-316ER, Model 767-38EF, and Model 767-316F Aircraft (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report filed on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 7, 2007 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.2.2Supplemental Agreement No. 23 dated as of March 6, 2007, to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 23, 2007 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.2.3Supplemental Agreement No. 24 dated as of November 10, 2008, to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 25, 2009 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.2.4Supplemental Agreements No. 28 and 29 (dated as of March 22, 2010 and November 10, 2010, respectively), to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company. Portions of these documents have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.2.5Supplemental Agreements No. 30, 31 and 32 (dated as of February 15, 2011, May 10, 2011 and December 22, 2011, respectively), to the Purchase Agreement No. 2126, dated as of January 30, 1998, between the Company and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.3Aircraft Lease Common Terms Agreement between GE Commercial Aviation Services Limited and LAN Cargo S.A., dated as of April 30, 2007, and Aircraft Lease Agreements between Wells Fargo Bank Northwest N.A., as owner trustee, and LAN Cargo S.A., dated as of April 30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 7, 2007 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.4Purchase Agreement No. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company relating to Boeing Model 777-Freighter aircraft dated as of July 3, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 25, 2008 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.4.1Supplemental Agreement No. 2 dated as of November 2, 2010, to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of July 3, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.4.2Supplemental Agreement No. 3 dated as of September 24, 2011, to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of July 3, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.4.3*Supplemental Agreement No. 4 dated as of August 9, 2012, to the Purchase Agreement No. 3194 between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of July 3, 2007. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.5Purchase Agreement No. 3256 between the Company and The Boeing Company relating to Boeing Model 787-8 and 787-9 aircraft dated as of October 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on June 25, 2008 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.5.1Supplemental Agreements No. 1 and 2 (dated March 22, 2010 and July 8, 2010, respectively) to the Purchase Agreement No. 3256 dated October 29, 2007, as amended, between the Company and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.5.2*Supplemental Agreement No. 3 dated as of August 24, 2012, to the Purchase Agreement No. 3256, as amended, between the Company and The Boeing Company, dated as of October 29, 2007. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.6General Terms Agreement No. CFM-1-2377460475 and Letter Agreement No. 1 to General Terms Agreement No. CFM-1-2377460475 between the Company and CFM International, Inc., both dated December 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.7Rate Per Flight Hour Engine Shop Maintenance Services Agreement between the Company and CFM International, Inc., dated December 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.8Digital Services Agreement, dated December 17, 2010 between the Company and GE Engine Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.9Implementation Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2011, among the Company, Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., InversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A., TAM S.A., TAM Empreedimentos e Participações S.A. and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, MaurícioRolimAmaro, Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro and João Francisco Amaro (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.9.1Extension Letter to the Implementation Agreement and Exchange Offer Agreement dated January 12, 2012 among the Company, Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., InversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A., TAM S.A., TAM Empreedimentos e Participações S.A. and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, MaurícioRolimAmaro, Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro and João Francisco Amaro (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
4.10Exchange Offer Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2011, among LAN Airlines S.A., Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., InversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A., TAM S.A., TAM Empreedimentos e Participações S.A. and Maria Cláudia Oliveira Amaro, MaurícioRolimAmaro, Noemy Almeida Oliveira Amaro and João Francisco Amaro (incorporated by reference to our amended annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on May 5, 2011).
4.11Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, among Costa Verde Aeronáutica S.A., InversionesMineras del Cantábrico S.A. and TEP Chile S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
4.12Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, between the Company and TEP Chile S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
4.13Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, among the Company, TEP Chile S.A. and Holdco I S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
4.14Shareholders Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2012, among the Company, TEP Chile S.A., Holdco I S.A. and TAM S.A. (incorporated by reference to our amended registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-177984) filed on November 15, 2011).
4.15Letter Agreement No. 12 (GTA No. 6-9576), dated July 11, 2011, between the Company and the General Electric Company (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.16Used PW6122A Five Engine Purchase Agreement, dated July 21, 2011, between the Company and Pratt & Whitney Engine Leasing, LLC (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.17Promise to Sell dated as of January 25, 2011, among LAN Cargo S.A., InversionesLAN S.A. and Bethia S.A. (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012).
4.18Assignment of Social Rights, dated as of April 6, 2011, between LAN Cargo S.A., InversionesLAN S.A., Servicios de TrasportesLimitada and InversionesBetminSpA (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.19Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2011, between LAN Cargo S.A. and InversionesBetminSpA (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012).
4.20A320 NEO Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 22, 2011, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.21Buyback Agreement No. 3001 relating to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3001, dated as of April 14, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.22Buyback Agreement No. 3030 relating to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3003, dated as of August 10, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.23Buyback Agreement No. 3062, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3062, dated as of May 13, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.24Buyback Agreement No. 3214, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3214, dated as of June 9, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.25Buyback Agreement No. 3216, to One (1) Airbus A318-100 Aircraft MSN 3216, dated as of July 13, 2011, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.26Aircraft General Terms Agreement Number AGTA-LAN, dated May 9, 1997, between the Company and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-14728) filed on April 2, 2012 and portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
4.27*Buyback Agreement No. 3371 dated as of July 25, 2012, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.28*Buyback Agreement No. 3390, dated as of October 26, 2012, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.29*Buyback Agreement No. 3438, dated as of December 5, 2012, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.30*Buyback Agreement No. 3469, dated as of January 4, 2013, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.31*Buyback Agreement No. 3509, dated as of February 20, 2013, between the Company and Airbus Financial Services. Portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.32A320 Family Purchase Agreement, dated March 19, 1998, between Airbus S.A.S. (formerly known as Airbus Industrie GIE) and TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. (formerly known as TAM Transportes Aéreas Meridionais S.A. and as successor in interest in TAM-Transportes Aéreas Regionais S.A.), incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.
4.32.1*Amendments No. 12, 13 and 14 (dated as of January 27, 2012 and November 30, 2012 and December 14, 2012, respectively), to the Second A320-Family Purchase Agreement dated as of March 20, 1998, as amended and restated, between the Company and Airbus S.A.S. Portions of these documents have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.33A350 Family Purchase Agreement, dated December 20, 2005, between Airbus S.A.S. and TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.
4.34V2500 Maintenance Agreement, dated September 14, 2000, between TAM Transportes Aéreos Regionais S.A. (incorporated by TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.) and MTU Maintenance Hannover GmbH (MTU), incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.
4.35PW4168A Maintenance Service Agreement, dated September 14, 2000, between TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A. and United Technologies International, Inc., Pratt & Whitney Division, incorporated herein by reference from our sixth pre-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed March 2, 2006, File No. 333-131938.
8.1*List of subsidiaries of the Company.
12.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
12.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.1*Certifications of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In accordance with IFRS 3, the determined value of goodwill is provisional.

*Filed herewith.

F-1-95