UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL

REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

2013 Commission File Number 0-99

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Mexican Petroleum United Mexican States
(Translation of registrant’s name into English) (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

 

Avenida Marina Nacional No. 329

Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos

11311 México D.F., México

(Address of principal executive offices)

Rolando Galindo Gálvez

(5255) 1944 9700

ri@pemex.com

Avenida Marina Nacional No. 329

Torre Ejecutiva Piso 38 Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos

11311 México D.F., México

(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number

and address of company contact person)

 

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.None

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

Title of Each Class

9.50% Global Guaranteed Bonds due 2027

9 1/4% Global Guaranteed Bonds due 2018

8.625% Bonds due 2022

7.375% Notes due 2014

5.75% Notes due 2015

5.75% Guaranteed Notes due 2018

9 1/4% Guaranteed Bonds due 2018

8.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2023

9.50% Guaranteed Bonds due 2027

6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2035

6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2038

8.00% Guaranteed Notes due 2019

4.875% Notes due 2015

6.000% Notes due 2020

5.50% Notes due 2021

6.500% Bonds due 2041

4.875% Notes due 2022

5.50% Bonds due 2044

3.500% Notes due 2018

Floating Rate Notes due 2018

3.500% Notes due 2023

4.875% Notes due 2024

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes¨    Nox

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to

Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes¨    Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx    No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act,Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨                Accelerated filer  ¨                Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP  ¨                IFRS as issued by the IASB  ¨x                Other  x¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17¨                Item 18x¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨    Nox

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item 1.

  

Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

   45  

Item 2.

  

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

   45  

Item 3.

  

Key Information

   45  

Item 4.

  

Information on the Company

   1214  

Item 4A.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   108125  

Item 5.

  

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

   108125  

Item 6.

  

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

   141154  

Item 7.

  

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

   168184  

Item 8.

  

Financial Information

   169186  

Item 9.

  

The Offer and Listing

175

Item 10.

Additional Information

175

Item 11.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

183

Item 12.

Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

189

Item 13.

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

   190  

Item 14.10.

  

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of ProceedsAdditional Information

   190  

Item 15.11.

  

ControlsQuantitative and ProceduresQualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   190199

Item 12.

Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities208

Item 13.

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies209

Item 14.

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds209

Item 15.

Controls and Procedures209  

Item 16A.

  

Audit Committee Financial Expert

   191210  

Item 16B.

  

Code of Ethics

   191210  

Item 16C.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   191210  

Item 16D.

  

Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

   192212  

Item 16E.

  

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

   193212  

Item 16F.

  

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

   193212  

Item 16G.

  

Corporate Governance

   193213

Item 16H.

Mine Safety Disclosure213  

Item 17.

  

Financial Statements

   194214  

Item 18.

  

Financial Statements

   194214  

Item 19.

  

Exhibits

   194214  

 

i


Petróleos Mexicanos and its four subsidiary entities,Pemex-Exploración y Producción (Pemex-Exploration and Production),Pemex-Refinación (Pemex-Refining),Pemex-Gas y Petroquímica Básica (Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals) andPemex-Petroquímica (Pemex-Petrochemicals and together with Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, collectively referred to as the subsidiary entities), comprise the state oil and gas company of the United Mexican States, which we refer to as Mexico. Each of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities is a decentralized public entity of the Federal Government of Mexico, which we refer to as the Mexican Government, and is a legal entity empowered to own property and carry on business in its own name. In addition, a number of subsidiary companies that are defined in Note 21 and listed in Note 3(b)3(a) to our consolidated financial statements incorporated in Item 18, including the Pemex Project Funding Master Trust (which we refer to as the Master Trust) andFideicomiso Irrevocable de Administración No. F/163 (which we refer to as Fideicomiso F/163) (which are described below under “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Commitments for Capital Expenditures and Sources of Funding”), are incorporated into the consolidated financial statements; these subsidiary companies are also identified with the corresponding ownership percentages in “––“—Consolidated Structure of PEMEX” on page 3.4. Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary entities and the subsidiary companies are collectively referred to as “PEMEX” or “we.”

References herein to “U.S. $,” “$,” “U.S. dollars” or “dollars” are to United States dollars. References herein to “pesos” or “Ps.” are to the legal currency of Mexico. References herein to “euros” or “€” are to the legal currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union. References herein to “pounds” or “£” are to the legal currency of the United Kingdom. References herein to “Swiss Francs”francs” or “CHF” are to the legal currency of the Swiss Confederation. References herein to “Japanese yen” or “¥” are to the legal currency of Japan. References herein to “Australian dollars” or “A$”“AUD” are to the legal currency of Australia. The term “billion” as used herein means one thousand million.

Our consolidated financial statements included in this report were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. We refer in this report to “International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board” as IFRS. In addition, these financial statements were audited in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing, as required by theComisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (National Banking and Securities Commission, which we refer to as the CNBV) for purposes of filing with theBolsa Mexicana de Valores (which we refer to as BMV or the Mexican Stock Exchange) and with the CNBV, and in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) for purposes of filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

The regulations of the SEC do not require foreign private issuers that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS to reconcile such financial statements to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (which we refer to as U.S. GAAP). Accordingly, while we have in the past reconciled our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance withNormas de Información Financiera Mexicanas (Mexican Financial Reporting Standards, or Mexican FRS) to U.S. GAAP, those reconciliations are no longer presented in our filings with the SEC. We do, however, continue to provide the disclosure required under the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 932 “Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas” (which we refer to as ASC Topic 932), as this is required regardless of the basis of accounting on which we prepare our financial statements.

We maintain our consolidated financial statements and accounting records in pesos. Unless otherwise indicated, we have translated all peso amounts to U.S. dollars in this Form 20-F, including all convenience translations of our consolidated financial statements included herein, at an exchange rate of Ps. 13.990413.0765 = U.S. $1.00, which is the exchange rate thatSecretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público (Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, or the SHCP) instructed us to use on December 31, 2011.2013. You should not construe these translations from pesos into dollars as actually representing such U.S. dollar amounts or meaning that you could convert such amounts into U.S. dollars at the rates indicated. The pesoMexico has depreciated substantially in relation to the U.S. dollar since the end of 1994, when a free market for foreign exchange, and

the Mexican Government allowedallows the peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar anddollar. There can be no assurance that the Mexican Government established a broad economic reform programwill maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso will not depreciate or appreciate significantly in response to these and other events.the future. Due to the volatility of the peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate, the exchange rate on any date subsequent to the date hereof could be materially different from the rate indicated above. See “Item 3—Key Information—Exchange Rates” for information regarding the rates of exchange between pesos and U.S. dollars.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING MEXICAN ENERGY REFORM

On December 12, 2013, the Permanent Commission of the Mexican Congress approved amendments to Articles 25, 27 and 28 of theConstitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, or the Mexican Constitution), which were subsequently approved by a majority of Mexico’s state legislatures and signed into law by the President of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto. On December 20, 2013, these amendments were published as theDecreto por el que se reforman y adicionan diversas disposiciones de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en Materia de Energía (Decree that amends and supplements various provisions of the Mexican Constitution relating to energy matters, which we refer to as the Energy Reform Decree) in theDiario Oficial de la Federación(Official Gazette of the Federation) and took effect on December 21, 2013.

The Energy Reform Decree includes transitional articles (orartículos transitorios) that set forth the general framework for the secondary legislation or implementing laws, which have not been enacted as of the date of this report. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform” for more details regarding the Energy Reform Decree, transitional articles and secondary legislation.

The transitional articles of the Energy Reform Decree outline a process, commonly referred to as Round Zero, for the determination of our initial allocation of rights to continue to carry out exploration and production activities in Mexico. Round Zero is being administered by theSecretaría de Energía (the Ministry of Energy), with technical assistance from theComisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos (National Hydrocarbons Commission, which we refer to as the NHC). In connection with Round Zero, we have submitted to the Ministry of Energy a request that we be assigned the right to explore and develop areas in which we currently operate based on our technical, financial and operational capabilities. As of the date of this report, the Round Zero process has not yet been completed. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform—Round Zero” for more details regarding the Round Zero process and our submission.

PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION CONCERNING RESERVES

The estimates of Mexico’s proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas for the five years ended December 31, 2013 included in this report have been calculated according to the technical definitions required by the SEC. Although DeGolyer and MacNaughton, Netherland, Sewell International, S. de R.L. de C.V. (which we refer to as Netherland Sewell) and Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (which we refer to as Ryder Scott) conducted reserves audits of our estimates of the proved hydrocarbon reserves of Mexico as of December 31, 2013 or January 1, 2014, as applicable, all reserves estimates involve some degree of uncertainty. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to Our Relationship with the Mexican Government—Information on Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves in this report is based on estimates, which are uncertain and subject to revision” and “—Our ability to maintain and increase our oil production levels depends on our ability to successfully develop proved hydrocarbon reserves, and failure to do so may limit our ability to maintain and increase our production” for a description of the risks relating to reserves and reserves estimates.

We include these estimates of Mexico’s proved reserves in this report and describe the reserves replacement rate by reference to these proved reserves because, as of December 31, 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production

had the right to extract, but not own, these reserves, and to sell the resulting production under theLey de Petróleos Mexicanos (Petróleos Mexicanos Law). Following the adoption of the Energy Reform Decree, our ability in the future to extract these reserves, and to sell the resulting production, will be determined by Round Zero, as described above. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to Our Relationship with the Mexican Government—The Mexican nation, not us, owns the hydrocarbon reserves located in the subsoil of Mexico and our right to continue to exploit these reserves is subject to the approval of the Ministry of Energy.”

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 20-F contains words, such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and similar expressions that identify forward-looking statements, which reflect our views about future events and financial performance. We have made forward-looking statements that address, among other things, our:

 

drillingexploration and other exploration activities;

production activities, including drilling;

 

activities relating to import, export, refining, petrochemicals and export activities;

transportation of petroleum, natural gas and oil products;

 

projected and targeted capital expenditures and other costs, commitments and revenues; and

 

liquidity.

liquidity and sources of funding.

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors that may be beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

 

changes in international crude oil and natural gas prices;

 

effects on us from competition;

 

limitations on our access to sources of financing on competitive terms;

 

the outcome of Round Zero and our ability to find, acquire or gain access to additional reserves and to develop the reserves that we obtain successfully;

uncertainties inherent in making estimates of oil and gas reserves, including recently discovered oil and gas reserves;

technical difficulties;

significant developments in the global economy;

 

significant economic or political developments in Mexico;

Mexico, including developments relating to the implementation of the Energy Reform Decree;

 

developments affecting the energy sector; and

 

changes in our legal regime or regulatory environment.

environment, including tax and environmental regulations.

Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In any event, these statements speak only as of their dates, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

For a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, you should see “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors.”

PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION CONCERNING RESERVES

The estimates of Mexico’s proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas for the five years ended December 31, 2011 included in this annual report have been calculated according to the technical definitions required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Although DeGolyer and MacNaughton, Netherland, Sewell International, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Ryder Scott Company, L.P. conducted reserves audits of our estimates of the proved hydrocarbon reserves of Mexico as of December 31, 2011 or January 1, 2012, as applicable, all reserves estimates involve some degree of uncertainty. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to the Relationship between PEMEX and the Mexican Government—The Mexican nation, not PEMEX, owns the hydrocarbon reserves in Mexico” and “—Information on Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves is based on estimates, which are uncertain and subject to revision” for a description of the risks relating to reserves and reserves estimates.

LOGO

LOGO

PART I

 

Item 1.Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

 

Item 2.Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

 

Item 3.Key Information

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected statement of comprehensive income, statement of financial position and cash flows data set forth below as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2013 have been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18.

The selected financial data set forth below as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2011 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements2012 and 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 20072011, 2012 and 2008, which are not included herein, and the consolidated financial statements of PEMEX for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011,2013, which are included in Item 18 of this report. PEMEX’sOur consolidated financial statements for each of the fivetwo fiscal years ended December 31, 20112012 were audited by KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C., an independent registered public accounting firm.

Our consolidated financial statements for the yearsfiscal year ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 20112013 were prepared in accordance withNormas de Información Financiera Mexicanas(Mexican Financial Reporting Standards, or Mexican FRS or NIFs). Our consolidated financial statements include the recognition of the effects of inflation on the financial information through December 31, 2007, based on the Mexican National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) publishedaudited byBanco de México and in accordance with Mexican FRS B-10 “Effects of Inflation” Castillo Miranda y Compañía, S.C. (which we refer to as FRS B-10). Commencing January 1, 2008, we have no longer used inflationBDO Mexico), an independent registered public accounting because the economic environment in which we operate, in which the accumulated inflation over the past three years was below 26%, has not qualified as “inflationary,” as defined by Mexican FRS. As a result, amounts in this report are presented in nominal terms; however, such amounts do reflect accumulated inflationary effects recognized up to December 31, 2007.firm.

In addition to the above, our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 have been reclassified in certain accounts with the purpose of making them comparable with our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011.

During 2011, accounting changes were made, as disclosed in Note 3(ab) to the consolidated financial statements. As a result, the consolidated financials statements as of December 31, 2010, the statements of financial position as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and the statements of income for the years then ended, were adjusted to recognize the effects of the application of FRS C-4 “Inventories.”

Mexican FRS differ in certain significant respects from United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (which we refer to as U.S. GAAP). The principal differences between our net income and equity under U.S. GAAP and Mexican FRS are described in Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included herein and in “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—U.S. GAAP Reconciliation.”

Beginning with the fiscal year starting January 1, 2012, Mexican issuers that disclose information through the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. (the Mexican Stock Exchange, which we refer to as the BMV) are required to prepare financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). In addition, these financial statementsmust be audited in accordance with International Standards on Auditing, as required by theComisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (National Banking and Securities Commission, which we refer to as the CNBV), and in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) for SEC filing

purposes. We will begin presenting financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the year ending December 31, 2012, with an official IFRS “adoption date” of January 1, 2012 and a “transition date” to IFRS of January 1, 2011.

Selected Financial Data of PEMEX

 

  Year Ended December 31,(1) 
  2007(2)  2008  2009  2010  2011  2011(3) 
  (in millions of pesos, except ratios)  (in millions of
U.S. dollars)
 

Income Statement Data

      

Amounts in accordance with Mexican FRS:

      

Net sales

  Ps.  1,139,257    Ps.  1,328,950    Ps.  1,089,921    Ps.  1,282,064    Ps.  1,558,429   U.S.  $111,393  

Operating income

  593,652    572,365    428,570    546,457    681,425    48,707  

Comprehensive financing result

  (20,047  (107,512  (15,308  (11,969  (91,641  (6,550

Net income (loss) for the year

  (18,308  (110,823  (94,370  (46,527  (91,483  (6,539

Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP:

      

Net sales

  1,139,257    1,328,950    1,089,921    1,282,064    1,558,429    111,393  

Operating income

  584,703    629,119    460,239    567,525    675,896    48,311  

Comprehensive financing result (cost) income

  (25,610  (123,863  (5,094  (3,277  (106,616  (7,621

Net income (loss) for the period

  (32,642  (66,512  (52,280  (16,507  (109,949  (7,859

Balance Sheet Data (end of period)

      

Amounts in accordance with Mexican FRS:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  170,997    114,224    159,760    133,587    117,100    8,370  

Total assets

  1,330,281    1,238,091    1,333,583    1,395,197    1,533,345    109,600  

Long-term debt

  424,828    495,487    529,258    575,171    672,275    48,053  

Total long-term liabilities

  990,909    1,033,987    1,155,917    1,299,245    1,473,794    105,343  

Equity (deficit)

  49,908    28,139    (65,294  (111,302  (193,919  (13,861

Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP:

      

Total assets

  1,211,719    1,240,718    1,321,570    1,402,672    1,515,359    108,314  

Equity (deficit)

  (198,083  (144,166  (423,159  (227,882  (326,202  (23,316

Other Financial Data

      

Amounts in accordance with Mexican FRS:

      

Depreciation and amortization

  72,592    89,840    76,891    96,482    97,753    6,987  

Investments in fixed assets at cost(4)

  155,121    132,092    213,232    184,584    175,850    12,569  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

      

Mexican FRS(5)

                        

U.S. GAAP(5)

                        
  Year ended December 31,(1)(2) 
  2011  2012  2013  2013(3) 
  (in millions of pesos, except ratios)  (in millions of
U.S. dollars)
 

Statement of Comprehensive Income Data

    

Net sales

 Ps. 1,558,454   Ps. 1,646,912   Ps. 1,608,205   U.S. $122,984  

Operating income

  861,311    905,339    727,622    55,644  

Financing income

  30,584    23,215    24,527    1,876  

Financing cost

  (63,236  (72,951  (54,067  (4,135

Exchange (loss) gain—Net

  (60,143  44,846    (3,951  (302

Net (loss) income for the period

  (106,942  2,600    (170,058  (13,005

Statement of Financial Position Data (end of period)

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  114,977    119,235    80,746    6,175  

Total assets

  1,981,374    2,024,183    2,047,390    156,570  

Long-term debt

  672,657    672,618    750,563    57,398  

Total long-term liabilities

  1,624,752    2,059,445    1,973,446    150,915  

Total equity (deficit)

  103,177    (271,066  (185,247  (14,166

Statement of Cash Flows

    

Depreciation and amortization

  127,380    140,538    148,492    11,356  

Acquisition of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment(4)

  167,014    197,509    245,628    18,784  

Other Financial Data

    

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(5)(6)

      1.14          

 

(1)We have not included selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, as we began presenting our financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, with an official IFRS “adoption date” of January 1, 2012 and a “transition date” to IFRS of January 1, 2011. Based on such adoption and transition dates, we were not required to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and therefore are unable to present selected financial data in accordance with IFRS for this period without unreasonable effort and expense.

(2)Includes Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary entities and the subsidiary companies (including the Master Trust, Fideicomiso F/163 and Pemex Finance, Ltd.).
(2)Figures for 2007 are statedlisted in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007.Note 3(a) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(3)Translations into U.S. dollars of amounts in pesos have been made at the exchange rate established by the SHCP for accounting purposes of Ps. 13.990413.0765 = U.S. $1.00 at December 31, 2011.2013. Such translations should not be construed as a representation that the peso amounts have been or could be converted into U.S. dollar amounts at the foregoing or any other rate.
(4)Includes capitalized comprehensive financing result. The amount of our investment in fixed assets in 2007 was derived from our accounting records, but does not appear directly in the corresponding statement of changes in financial position. Beginning with our 2008 fiscal year, the amount presented for investment in fixed assets is that which is included in the statement of cash flows.cost. See Note 3(l)10 to our consolidated financial statements included herein and “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
(5)Under Mexican FRS, earningsEarnings, for this purpose, consist of pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations before income from equity investees, plus fixed charges, minus interest capitalized during the period, plus the amortization of capitalized interest during the period and plus dividends received on equity investments. Pre-tax income (loss) is calculated after the deduction of hydrocarbon duties, but before the deduction of the hydrocarbon income tax and other income taxes. Fixed charges for this purpose consist of the sum of interest expense plus interest capitalized during the period. Fixed charges do not take into account exchange gain or loss attributable to our indebtedness.
(6)Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 20102011 and 20112013 were insufficient to cover fixed charges. The amount by which fixed charges exceeded earnings was Ps. 16,174 million, Ps. 96,481 million, Ps. 88,542 million, Ps. 45,873108,098 million and Ps. 89,529163,803 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 20102011 and 2011, respectively. Under U.S. GAAP, earnings for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were insufficient to cover fixed charges. The amount by which fixed charges exceeded earnings was Ps. 33,160 million, Ps. 55,626 million, Ps. 46,658 million, Ps. 16,112 million and Ps. 110,034 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011,2013, respectively.

Source: PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements.statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS, as it relates to the Selected Statements of Comprehensive Income, Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Cash Flows Data; and Petróleos Mexicanos, as it relates to Other Financial Data.

EXCHANGE RATES

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end exchange rates for the purchase of U.S. dollars, expressed in pesos per U.S. dollar. These rates have not been restated in constant currency units.

 

Period

  Exchange Rate 
Year Ended December 31,  High   Low   Average(1)   Period End 

2007

   11.269     10.667     10.925     10.917  

2008

   13.935     9.917     11.212     13.832  

2009

   15.406     12.632     13.578     13.058  

2010

   13.194     12.156     12.635     12.383  

2011

   14.254     11.505     12.427     13.951  

November 2011

   14.254     13.383     13.695     13.620  

December 2011

   13.993     13.489     13.775     13.951  

2012

        

January 2012

   13.750     12.925     13.383     13.036  

February 2012

   12.951     12.625     12.783     12.794  

March 2012

   12.990     12.628     12.752     12.812  

April 2012(2)

   13.229     12.730     13.030     13.121  

Period

  Exchange Rate 
   High   Low   Average(1)   Period End 

Year Ended December 31,

        

2009

   15.406     12.632     13.578     13.058  

2010

   13.194     12.156     12.635     12.383  

2011

   14.254     11.505     12.464     13.951  

2012

   14.365     12.625     13.140     12.964  

2013

   13.433     11.976     12.857     13.098  

November 2013

   13.243     12.871     13.060     13.111  

December 2013

   13.217     12.851     13.010     13.098  

2014

        

January 2014

   13.456     12.997     13.222     13.359  

February 2014

   13.509     13.204     13.293     13.226  

March 2014

   13.332     13.056     13.193     13.056  

April 2014

   13.143     12.950     13.067     13.084  

May 2014(2)

   13.053     12.946     12.996     12.986  

 

(1)Average of month-end rates, except for 20112013 and 20122014 monthly exchange rates.
(2)For the period from AprilMay 1, 20122014 to April 20, 2012.May 9, 2014.

Source:Noon buying rate for cable transfers in New York reported by the Federal Reserve.

Source:Noon buying rate for cable transfers in New York reported by the Federal Reserve.

The noon buying rate for cable transfers in New York reported by the Federal Reserve on April 20, 2012May 9, 2014 was Ps. 13.12112.986 = U.S. $1.00.

RISK FACTORS

Risk FactorsConsiderations Related to the Operations of PEMEXMexico

Crude oil and natural gas prices are volatile and low crude oil and natural gas prices adversely affect PEMEX’s income and cash flows and the amount of Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves.

International crude oil and natural gas prices are subject to global supply and demand and fluctuate due to many factors beyond our control. These factors include competition within the oil and natural gas industry, the prices and availability of alternative sources of energy, international economic trends, exchange rate fluctuations, expectations of inflation, domestic and foreign government regulations or international laws, political and other events in major oil and natural gas producing and consuming nations and actions taken by OrganizationThe effects of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) membersEnergy Reform Decree and other oil exporting countries, trading activityits implementation are uncertain but likely to be material.

The Energy Reform Decree, which was enacted in oilDecember 2013, included transitional articles that set forth the framework for the implementation of secondary legislation and natural gasprovided for certain transitional steps, including the Round Zero process described below. We expect that the effects of these developments on our business and transactions in derivative financial instruments (which we refer to as DFIs) related to oil and gas.

When international crude oil and natural gas prices are low, we earn less export sales revenue and, therefore, generate lower cash flows and earn less income, because our costs remain roughly constant. Conversely, when crude oil and natural gas prices are high, we earn more export sales revenue and our income before taxes and duties increases. As a result, future fluctuations in international crude oil and natural gas pricesoperations will be material. Among the features of the Energy Reform Decree that could have a directan effect on our resultsoperations are the following:

the Mexican Government will carry out the exploration and extraction of operationshydrocarbons in Mexico through assignments to us, as a productive state-owned company, as well as through agreements with us and financial condition,with private sector;

theComisión Reguladora de Energía (Energy Regulatory Commission) will have the authority to grant permits to us and private sector companies to engage in natural gas processing, oil refining and transport, storage, distribution and selling of hydrocarbons and petrochemicals and their derivatives in Mexico;

the transfer of certain of Pemex Gas and may affect Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves estimates. See “—Risk Factors RelatedBasic Petrochemicals’ assets related to the Relationship between PEMEXnational gas pipeline system to a separate decentralized public entity that will be created in the future; and

the grant of additional technical and administrative authority to the Ministry of Energy, the NHC and the Mexican Government—Information on Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves is based on estimates, which are uncertain and subject to revisions” and “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Hydrocarbon Price Risk.”

Energy Regulatory Commission.

PEMEX is an integrated oil and gas company and is exposed to production, equipment and transportation risks, criminal acts and deliberate acts of terror.

We are subject to several risks that are common among oil and gas companies. These risks include production risks (fluctuations in production due to operational hazards, natural disasters or weather, accidents, etc.), equipment risks (relating to the adequacy and condition of our facilities and equipment) and transportation risks (relating to the condition and vulnerability of pipelines and other modes of transportation). More specifically, our business is subject to the risks of explosions in pipelines, refineries, plants, drilling wells and other facilities, hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico and other natural or geological disasters and accidents, fires and mechanical failures. Criminal attempts to divert our crude oil, natural gas or refined products from our pipeline network and facilities for illegal sale have resulted in explosions, property and environmental damage, injuries and loss of lives.

Our facilities are also subject to the risk of sabotage, terrorism and cyber attacks. In July 2007, two of our pipelines were attacked. In September 2007, six different sites were attacked and 12 of our pipelines were affected. The occurrence of any of these events or of accidents connected with production, processing and transporting oil and oil products could result in personal injuries, loss of life, environmental damage with resulting containment, clean-up and repair expenses, equipment damage and damage to our facilities. A shutdown of the affected facilities could disrupt our production and increase our production costs. As of the date of this report there have been no similar occurrences since 2007. Thoughand until the secondary legislation related to the Energy Reform Decree becomes effective and private sector companies enter into contractual agreements to operate in the Mexican energy sector, we are the only entity that conducts the petroleum industry in Mexico on behalf of Mexico.

As of the date of this report, one key aspect of the Energy Reform Decree—our initial allocation of oil and gas exploration and extraction rights—is being implemented pursuant to a process outlined in the transitional articles and referred to as Round Zero. As part of Round Zero, we have established cybersecurity systemssubmitted a request that the Ministry of Energy assign to us certain oil and proceduresgas exploration and extraction rights. The Ministry of Energy has a deadline of September 17, 2014 to protectrespond to our information technologyrequest. See “—Risk Factors Related to Our Relationship with the Mexican Government—The Mexican nation, not us, owns the hydrocarbon reserves located in the subsoil of Mexico and haveour right to continue to exploit these reserves is subject to the approval of the Ministry of Energy” below in this Item 3.

The secondary legislation implementing the Energy Reform Decree is expected to include, among other things, additional details regarding the contractual and fiscal regime that will be applicable to us and changes to our corporate structure as part of Petróleos Mexicanos’ conversion from a decentralized public entity to a “productive state-owned company” by December 2015. As of the date of this report, this secondary legislation has not yet sufferedbeen adopted. The impact of the Energy Reform Decree on us will largely depend on how it is implemented by the secondary legislation and on the outcome of Round Zero. It would therefore be premature to predict the long-term effects of the Energy Reform Decree and the new framework it contemplates, but these effects could be adverse to our interests in significant respects. In addition, as a cyber attack, if the integrityresult of longstanding restrictions included in certain of our information technologyfinancing agreements that were ever compromised duebased on the legal framework in effect before the Energy Reform Decree was enacted, these effects may cause us to a cyber attack, our business operations could be disrupted and our proprietary information could be lost or stolen.

We purchase comprehensive insurance policies covering most ofdefault on these risks; however, these policies may not cover all liabilities, and insurance may not be available for some of the consequential risks. There can be no assurance that accidents or acts of terror will not occuragreements in the future, that insurance will adequately cover the entire scope or extent of our losses orevent that we may not be found directly liable in connection with claims arisingare unable to obtain waivers from theseour lenders or other events. Seebondholders, as applicable. For more information, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—PEMEX Corporate Matters—Insurance.History and Development—Energy Reform.

PEMEX hasEconomic conditions and government policies in Mexico and elsewhere may have a substantial amount of liabilities thatmaterial impact on our operations.

A deterioration in Mexico’s economic condition, social instability, political unrest or other adverse social developments in Mexico could adversely affect our business and financial condition. Those events could also

lead to increased volatility in the foreign exchange and financial markets, thereby affecting our ability to obtain new financing and service our debt. Additionally, the Mexican Government may cut spending in the future. These cuts could adversely affect our business, financial condition and resultsprospects. In the past, Mexico has experienced several periods of slow or negative economic growth, high inflation, high interest rates, currency devaluation and other economic problems. These problems may worsen or reemerge, as applicable, in the future, and could adversely affect our business and our ability to service our debt. A worsening of international financial or economic conditions, including a slowdown in growth or recessionary conditions in Mexico’s trading partners, including the United States, or the emergence of a new financial crisis, could have adverse effects on the Mexican economy, our financial condition and our ability to service our debt.

Changes in exchange rates or in Mexico’s exchange control laws may hamper our ability to service our foreign currency debt.

The Mexican Government does not currently restrict the ability of Mexican companies or individuals to convert pesos into U.S. dollars or other currencies, and Mexico has not had a fixed exchange rate control policy since 1982. However, in the future, the Mexican Government could impose a restrictive exchange control policy, as it has done in the past. We cannot provide assurances that the Mexican Government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso’s value will not fluctuate significantly in the future. The peso has been subject to significant devaluations against the U.S. dollar in the past and may be subject to significant fluctuations in the future. Mexican Government policies affecting the value of the peso or preventing us from exchanging pesos into U.S. dollars could prevent us from paying our foreign currency obligations.

Most of our debt is denominated in U.S. dollars. In the future, we may incur additional indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars or other currencies. Declines in the value of the peso relative to the U.S. dollar or other currencies may increase our interest costs in pesos and result in foreign exchange losses to the extent that we have not hedged our exposure with derivative financial instruments, which we refer to as DFIs.

For information on historical peso/U.S. dollar exchange rates, see “—Key Information—Exchange Rates” in this Item 3.

Political conditions in Mexico could materially and adversely affect Mexican economic policy and, in turn, our operations.

WePolitical events in Mexico may significantly affect Mexican economic policy and, consequently, our operations. On December 1, 2012, Enrique Peña Nieto, a member of thePartido Revolucionario Institucional(Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI), formally assumed office for a six-year term as the President of Mexico. As of the date of this report, no political party holds a simple majority in either house of the Mexican Congress.

Mexico has experienced a period of increasing criminal violence and such activities could affect our operations.

Recently, Mexico has experienced a period of increasing criminal violence, primarily due to the activities of drug cartels and related criminal organizations. In response, the Mexican Government has implemented various security measures and has strengthened its military and police forces. Despite these efforts, drug-related crime continues to exist in Mexico. These activities, their possible escalation and the violence associated with them, in an extreme case, may have a substantial amount of debt. As of December 31, 2011, our total indebtedness, excluding accrued interest, was approximately U.S. $55.3 billion, in nominal terms, which is a 3.9% increase as compared to our total indebtedness, excluding accrued interest, of approximately U.S. $53.2 billion at December 31, 2010. Our level of debt may increase further in the near or medium term and may have an adverse effectnegative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

To service our debt, we have relied and may continue to rely on a combination of cash flows provided by operations, drawdowns under our available credit facilities and the incurrence of additional indebtedness. Certain rating agencies have expressed concerns regarding the total amount of our debt, our increase in indebtedness over the last several years and our substantial unfunded reserve for retirement pensions and seniority premiums, which as of December 31, 2011 was equal to approximately U.S. $52.2 billion. Due to our heavy tax burden, we have resorted to financings to fund our capital investment projects. Any further lowering of our credit ratings may have adverse consequences on our ability to access the financial markets and/or our cost of financing. If we were unable to obtain financing on favorable terms, this could hamper our ability to obtain further financing as well as hamper investment in facilities financed through debt. As a result, we may not be able to make the capital expenditures needed to maintain our current production levels and to maintain, as well as increase, Mexico’s proved hydrocarbon reserves, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See “—Risk Factors Related to theOur Relationship between PEMEX andwith the Mexican Government—PEMEX must make significant capital expenditures to maintain its current production levels, and to maintain, as well as

Government

increase, Mexico’s proved hydrocarbon reserves. Mexican Government budget cuts, reductions in PEMEX’s income and inability to obtain financing may limit PEMEX’s ability to make capital investments.”

PEMEX’s compliance with environmental regulations in Mexico could result in material adverse effects on its results of operations.

A wide range of general and industry-specific Mexican federal and state environmental laws and regulations apply to our operations; these laws and regulations are often difficult and costly to comply with and carry substantial penalties for non-compliance. This regulatory burden increases our costs because it requires us to make significant capital expenditures and limits our ability to extract hydrocarbons, resulting in lower revenues. For an estimate of our accrued environmental liabilities, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Environmental Regulation—Environmental Liabilities.” In addition, we have agreed with third parties to make investments to reduce our carbon emissions. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Environmental Regulation—Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction.”

PEMEX publishes less U.S. GAAP financial information than U.S. companies are required to file with the SEC.

We prepare our financial statements according to Mexican FRS, which differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. See “Item 3—Key Information—Selected Financial Data,” “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—U.S. GAAP Reconciliation” and Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included herein. As a foreign issuer, we are not required to prepare quarterly U.S. GAAP financial information, and we therefore generally prepare a reconciliation of our net income (loss) and equity (deficit) under Mexican FRS to U.S. GAAP as well as explanatory notes and additional disclosure required under U.S. GAAP on a yearly basis only. As a result, there may be less or different publicly available information about us than there is about U.S. issuers.

Risk Factors Related to the Relationship between PEMEX and the Mexican Government

The Mexican Government controls PEMEXus and it could limit PEMEX’sour ability to satisfy itsour external debt obligations or could reorganize or transfer PEMEXus or itsour assets.

Each of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities is a decentralized public entity of the Mexican Government, and therefore the Mexican Government controls us, as well as, as of the date of this report, our

annual budget, which is approved by theCámara de Diputados (Chamber of Deputies). However,The Energy Reform Decree provides that by December 2015, Petróleos Mexicanos will be converted from a decentralized public entity to a productive state-owned company. Moreover, the proposed secondary legislation implementing the Energy Reform Decree provides us with, among other things, additional technical, managerial and budgetary autonomy designed to increase our financing obligations do not constitute obligations ofproduction and are not guaranteed byallow us to compete effectively with other oil and gas companies that enter the Mexican Government. Theenergy sector. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform.” Notwithstanding this increased autonomy and our conversion to a productive state-owned company, Petróleos Mexicanos will continue to remain under the Mexican Government’s control, as the Mexican Government has (and, following the implementation of the Energy Reform Decree and related proposed secondary legislation, will continue to have, albeit to a lesser extent) the power to intervene directly or indirectly in our commercial and operational affairs. Intervention by the Mexican Government could adversely affect our ability to make payments under any securities issued by us. Although Petróleos Mexicanos is (and following its conversion to a productive state-owned company will remain) under the Mexican Government’s control, its financing obligations do not constitute obligations of and are not guaranteed by the Mexican Government.

The Mexican Government’s agreements with international creditors may affect our external debt obligations. In certain past debt restructurings of the Mexican Government, Petróleos Mexicanos’ external indebtedness was treated on the same terms as the debt of the Mexican Government and other public sector entities. In addition, Mexico has entered into agreements with official bilateral creditors to reschedule public sector external debt. Mexico has not requested restructuring of bonds or debt owed to multilateral agencies.

The Energy Reform Decree contemplates the transfer of certain of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ assets to another decentralized public entity of the Mexican Government that will be created in the future. The Mexican Government would havehas the power, ifin connection with theConstitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Political Constitution implementation of the Unitedsecondary legislation relating to the Energy Reform Decree or if the Mexican States)Constitution and federal law were further amended, to reorganize PEMEX,us, including a transfer of all or a portion of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities or their assets to an entity not controlled by the Mexican Government. Such aThe reorganization and transfer of assets contemplated by the Energy Reform Decree or any other reorganization or transfer that the Mexican Government may effect, could adversely affect our production, cause a disruption in our workforce and our operations and cause us to default on certain obligations. See also “—Considerations Related to Mexico” below.

above in this Item 3.

Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities pay special taxes and duties to the Mexican Government, which may limit PEMEX’sour capacity to expand itsour investment program.

PEMEX paysWe pay a substantial amount of taxes and duties to the Mexican Government, particularly on the revenues of Pemex-Exploration and Production, which may limit PEMEX’sour ability to make capital investments. In 2011,2013, approximately 56.2%53.8% of theour sales revenues of PEMEX was used to pay taxes and duties to the Mexican Government. These special taxes and duties constitute a substantial portion of the Mexican Government’s revenues. For further information, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Taxes and Duties” and “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—IEPS Tax, Hydrocarbon Duties and Other Taxes.” The Energy Reform Decree contemplates that the secondary legislation implementing it will include a new fiscal regime applicable to us. See “—Considerations Related to Mexico—The effects of the Energy Reform Decree and its implementation are uncertain but likely to be material” above in this Item 3.

The Mexican Government has entered into agreements with other nations to limit production.

Although Mexico is not a member of OPEC, in the past it has entered into agreements with OPEC and non-OPEC countries to reduce global crude oil supply. We do not control the Mexican Government’s international affairs and the Mexican Government could agree with OPEC or other countries to reduce our crude oil production or exports in the future. A reduction in our oil production or exports could reduce our revenues.

The Mexican Government has imposed price controls in the domestic market on PEMEX’sour products.

The Mexican Government has from time to time imposed price controls on the sales of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), gasoline, diesel, gas oil intended for domestic use, and fuel oil number 6, among others.and other products. As a result of these price controls, PEMEX haswe have not been able to pass on all of the increases in the prices of itsour product purchases to itsour customers in the domestic market. We do not control the Mexican Government’s domestic policies and the Mexican Government could impose additional price controls on the domestic market in the future. The imposition of such price controls would adversely affect our results of operations. For more information, see “Item

“Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Refining—Pricing Decrees” and “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Pricing Decrees.”

The Mexican nation, not PEMEX,us, owns the hydrocarbon reserves located in Mexico.the subsoil of Mexico and our right to continue to exploit these reserves is subject to the approval of the Ministry of Energy.

The PoliticalMexican Constitution of the United Mexican States provides that the Mexican nation, not PEMEX,us, owns all petroleum and other hydrocarbon reserves located in the subsoil of Mexico. Although

Following the adoption of the Energy Reform Decree, Article 27 of the Mexican law gives Pemex-ExplorationConstitution provides that the Mexican Government will carry out exploration and Productionextraction activities through agreements with private sector companies and through assignments to and agreements with us. Once the exclusivesecondary legislation related to the Energy Reform Decree is fully implemented, we and other oil and gas companies will have the right to exploit Mexico’sthe petroleum and other hydrocarbon reserves it does not precludelocated in the Mexican Congress from changing current law and assigning some or allsubsoil of Mexico, subject to assignment of these rights by the Ministry of Energy and entry into agreements pursuant to another company. Sucha competitive bidding process.

On March 21, 2014, as part of Round Zero, we submitted to the Ministry of Energy a request that we be assigned the right to continue to explore and develop areas that together contain 96% of Mexico’s estimated proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2013. The transitional articles of the Energy Reform Decree provide that the Ministry of Energy will take the following factors into consideration when determining whether to grant us an event would adversely affectassignment:

with respect to areas that we were actively exploring in which we had made commercial discoveries or investments as of December 21, 2013, our investment capacity and evidence of a detailed plan for exploration; and

with respect to areas that we already had under production as of December 21, 2013, our development plan for producing fields, including evidence of proper development of such fields and our ability to efficiently and competitively carry out production activities.

The Ministry of Energy has a deadline of September 17, 2014 to respond to our request. The Ministry of Energy may not approve the assignment of certain of the proved oil and gas reserves we requested.

Access to crude oil and natural gas reserves is essential to an oil and gas company’s sustained production and generation of income, and our ability to generate income.income would be materially and adversely affected if we do not receive a significant percentage of the proved oil and gas reserves that we have requested pursuant to Round Zero or if the Mexican Government were to restrict or prevent us from exploiting any crude oil and natural gas reserves that it assigns to us. For more information, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform—Round Zero.”

Information on Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves in this report is based on estimates, which are uncertain and subject to revisions.

The information on oil, gas and other reserves set forth in this Form 20-Freport is based on estimates. Reserves valuation is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner; the accuracy of any reserves estimate depends on the quality and reliability of available data, engineering and geological interpretation and subjective judgment. Additionally, estimates may be revised based on subsequent results of drilling, testing and production. These estimates are also subject to certain adjustments based on changes in variables, including crude oil prices. Therefore, proved reserves estimates may differ materially from the ultimately recoverable quantities of crude oil and natural gas. See “—Risk Factors Related to the Operations of PEMEX—Our Operations—Crude oil and natural gas prices are volatile and low crude oil and natural gas prices adversely affect PEMEX’sour income and cash flows and the amount of Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves.reserves that we have the right to extract and sell.” Pemex-Exploration and Production revises its estimates of Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves that it is entitled to extract and sell annually, which may result in material

revisions to our estimates of Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves.

reserves it is entitled to extract and sell. Our ability to maintain our long-term growth objectives for oil production depends on our ability to successfully develop our reserves, and failure to do so could prevent us from achieving our long-term goals for growth in production.

PEMEXWe must make significant capital expenditures to maintain itsour current production levels, and to maintain, as well as increase, Mexico’sany proved hydrocarbon reserves.reserves that may be assigned to us pursuant to Round Zero. Mexican Government budget cuts, reductions in PEMEX’sour income and inability to obtain financing may limit PEMEX’sour ability to make capital investments.

We invest fundsOur ability to maintain, as well as increase, the amount of extractableour oil production levels is highly dependent upon our ability to successfully develop existing hydrocarbon reserves and, in Mexico. the long term, upon our ability to obtain the right to develop additional reserves.

We also continually invest capital to enhance our hydrocarbon recovery ratio and improve the reliability and productivity of our infrastructure. WhileDespite these investments, the replacement rate for proved hydrocarbon reserves has increaseddecreased to 67.8% in recent years, from 77.1% in 2009 to 85.8% in 2010, the overall replacement rate remained less than 100% until 2011, which represents2013, representing a significant decline in Mexico’s proved hydrocarbon reserves. Nevertheless, in 2011 the replacement rate for proved hydrocarbon reserves was 101.1%. Pemex-Exploration and Production’s crude oil production decreased by 6.8% from 2008 to 2009, by 1.0% from 20092010 to 2010,2011, by 0.2% from 2011 to 2012 and by 1.0% from 20102012 to 2011,2013, primarily as a result of the decline of production in the Cantarell project. and Delta del Grijalva projects.

The development of the reserves that are assigned to us pursuant to Round Zero, particularly any reserves in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico and in shale oil and gas fields in the Burgos basin, will demand significant capital investments and will pose significant operational challenges. We cannot guarantee that we will have or will be able to obtain, in the time frame that we expect, sufficient resources necessary to exploit the reserves that the Mexican Government assigns to us as part of Round Zero, or that it may grant to us in the future. In addition, increased competition in the oil and gas sector in Mexico may increase the costs of obtaining additional acreage in bidding rounds for the rights to new reserves.

Our ability to make capital expenditures is limited by the substantial taxes and duties that we pay to the Mexican Government and cyclical decreases in our revenues primarily related to lower oil prices. In addition, budgetBudget cuts imposed by the Mexican Government and the availability of financing may also limit our ability to make capital investments.investments that are necessary to maintain current production levels and increase the proved hydrocarbon reserves we are entitled to exploit. For more information, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Capital Expenditures and Investments.Investments” and “—Energy Reform.

PEMEXIncreased competition in the Mexican energy sector may have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial conditions.

Once the secondary legislation related to the Energy Reform Decree is fully implemented, we and other oil and gas companies will have the right to carry out certain activities related to the energy sector in Mexico, including exploration and extraction activities. The Mexican Government will carry out exploration and extraction activities through agreements with private sector companies and through allocations to or agreements with us. Any oil and gas fields that we do not request or are not assigned to us pursuant to Round Zero will be subject to a competitive bidding process open to participation by private sector companies in which we will not have a preferential right. We will also likely face competition for the right to develop new oil and gas fields in Mexico, as well as in connection with certain refining, transportation and processing activities. For more information, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform.” If we are unable to compete successfully with private sector companies in the energy sector in Mexico, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We may claim some immunities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Mexican law, and your ability to sue or recover may be limited.

Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are decentralized public entities of the Mexican Government. Accordingly, you may not be able to obtain a judgment in a U.S. court against us unless the U.S.

court determines that we are not entitled to sovereign immunity with respect to that action. In addition, Mexican law does not allow attachment prior to judgment or attachment in aid of execution upon a judgment by Mexican courts upon the assets of Petróleos Mexicanos or the subsidiary entities. As a result, your ability to enforce judgments against us in the courts of Mexico may be limited. We also do not know whether Mexican courts would enforce judgments of U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Therefore, even if you were able to obtain a U.S. judgment against us, you might not be able to obtain a judgment in Mexico that is based on that U.S. judgment. Moreover, you may not be able to enforce a judgment against our property in the United States except under the limited circumstances specified in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, as amended. Finally, if you were to bring an action in Mexico seeking to enforce our obligations under any of our securities, satisfaction of those obligations may be made in pesos, pursuant to the laws of Mexico.

PEMEX’sOur directors and officers, as well as some of the experts named in this Form 20-F, reside outside the United States. Substantially all of our assets and those of most of our directors, officers and experts are located outside the United States. As a result, you may not be able to effect service of process on our directors or officers or those experts within the United States.

ConsiderationsRisk Factors Related to MexicoOur Operations

Economic conditionsCrude oil and government policies in Mexiconatural gas prices are volatile and elsewhere may have a material impact on PEMEX’s operations.

A deterioration in Mexico’s economic condition, social instability, political unrest or other adverse social developments in Mexico couldlow crude oil and natural gas prices adversely affect our businessincome and financial condition. Those events could also leadcash flows and the amount of Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves.

International crude oil and natural gas prices are subject to increased volatility inglobal supply and demand and fluctuate due to many factors beyond our control. These factors include competition within the oil and natural gas industry, the prices and availability of alternative sources of energy, international economic trends, exchange rate fluctuations, expectations of inflation, domestic and foreign exchange and financial markets, thereby affecting our ability to obtain new financing and service foreign debt. Additionally, the Mexican Government may cut spending in the future. These cuts could adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects. In the past, Mexico has experienced several periods of slowgovernment regulations or negative economic growth, high inflation, high interest rates, currency devaluationinternational laws, political and other economic problems. These problems may worsen or reemerge, as applicable,events in major oil and natural gas producing and consuming nations and actions taken by Organization of the future,Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) members and could adversely affectother oil exporting countries, trading activity in oil and natural gas and transactions in DFIs related to oil and gas.

When international crude oil and natural gas prices are low, we earn less export sales revenue and, therefore, generate lower cash flows and earn less income, because our businesscosts remain roughly constant. Conversely, when crude oil and natural gas prices are high, we earn more export sales revenue and our ability to service our debt. A worsening of international financial or economic conditions, including a slowdown in growth or recessionary conditions in Mexico’s trading partners, including the United States, or the emergence of a new financial crisis, could have adverse effects on the Mexican economy, our financial conditionincome before taxes and our ability to service our debt.

Changes in exchange rates or in Mexico’s exchange control laws may hamper the ability of PEMEX to service its foreign currency debt.

The Mexican Government does not currently restrict the ability of Mexican companies or individuals to convert pesos into U.S. dollars or other currencies, and Mexico has not had a fixed exchange rate control policy since 1982. However, in the future, the Mexican Government could impose a restrictive exchange control policy, as it has done in the past. We cannot provide assurances that the Mexican Government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso’s value will not fluctuate significantly in the future. The peso has been subject to significant devaluations against the U.S. dollar in the past and may be subject to significant fluctuations in the future. Mexican Government policies affecting the value of the peso could prevent us from paying our foreign currency obligations.

Most of our debt is denominated in U.S. dollars. In the future, we may incur additional indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars or other currencies. Declines in the value of the peso relative to the U.S. dollar or other currencies may increase our interest costs in pesos and result in foreign exchange losses to the extent that we have not hedged the exposure with derivative financial instruments.

For information on historical peso/U.S. dollar exchange rates, see “Item 3—Key Information—Exchange Rates.”

Political conditions in Mexico could materially and adversely affect Mexican economic policy and, in turn, PEMEX’s operations.

Political events in Mexico may significantly affect Mexican economic policy and, consequently, our operations. On December 1, 2006, Felipe de Jesús Calderón Hinojosa, a member of thePartido Acción Nacional(National Action Party, or PAN), formally assumed office for a six-year term as the President of Mexico. Currently, no political party holds a simple majority in either house of the Mexican Congress.

Presidential and federal congressional elections in Mexico will be held in July 2012. The Mexican presidential election will result in a change in administration, as presidential reelection is not permitted in Mexico.duties increases. As a result, we cannot predict whether changesfuture fluctuations in Mexican governmental policyinternational crude oil and natural gas prices will result from the change in administration. Any such changes could adversely affect economic conditions or the industry in which we operate in Mexico and thereforehave a direct effect on our results of operations and financial position.condition, and may affect Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves estimates. See “—Risk Factors Related to Our Relationship with the Mexican Government—Information on Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves in this report is based on estimates, which are uncertain and subject to revisions” above in this Item 3 and “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Hydrocarbon Price Risk.”

We are an integrated oil and gas company and are exposed to production, equipment and transportation risks, criminal acts and deliberate acts of terror.

We are subject to several risks that are common among oil and gas companies. These risks include production risks (fluctuations in production due to operational hazards, natural disasters or weather, accidents, etc.), equipment risks (relating to the adequacy and condition of our facilities and equipment) and transportation risks (relating to the condition and vulnerability of pipelines and other modes of transportation). More specifically, our business is subject to the risks of explosions in pipelines, refineries, plants, drilling wells and other facilities, hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico has experiencedand other natural or geological disasters and accidents, fires and mechanical failures. Criminal attempts to divert our crude oil, natural gas or refined products from our pipeline network and facilities for illegal sale have resulted in explosions, property and environmental damage, injuries and loss of life.

Our facilities are also subject to the risk of sabotage, terrorism and cyber attacks. In July 2007, two of our pipelines were attacked. In September 2007, six different sites were attacked and 12 of our pipelines were affected. The occurrence of any of these events or of accidents connected with production, processing and transporting oil and oil products could result in personal injuries, loss of life, environmental damage with resulting containment, clean-up and repair expenses, equipment damage and damage to our facilities. A shutdown of the affected facilities could disrupt our production and increase our production costs. As of the date of this report, there have been no similar occurrences since 2007. Although we have established cybersecurity systems and procedures to protect our information technology and have not yet suffered a periodcyber attack, if the integrity of increasing criminal violenceour information technology were ever compromised due to a cyber attack, our business operations could be disrupted and such activitiesour proprietary information could be lost or stolen.

We purchase comprehensive insurance policies covering most of these risks; however, these policies may not cover all liabilities, and insurance may not be available for some of the consequential risks. There can be no assurance that accidents or acts of terror will not occur in the future, that insurance will adequately cover the entire scope or extent of our losses or that we may not be found directly liable in connection with claims arising from these or other events. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—PEMEX Corporate Matters—Insurance.”

We have a substantial amount of liabilities that could adversely affect PEMEX’sour financial condition and results of operations.

Recently, Mexico has experiencedWe have a periodsubstantial amount of increasing criminal violence, primarily duedebt. As of December 31, 2013, our total indebtedness, excluding accrued interest, was approximately U.S. $63.6 billion, in nominal terms, which is a 6.4% increase as compared to our total indebtedness, excluding accrued interest, of approximately U.S. $59.8 billion at December 31, 2012. Our level of debt may increase further in the activities of drug cartelsnear or medium term and related criminal organizations. In response, the Mexican Government has implemented various security measures and has strengthened its military and police forces. Despite these efforts, drug-related crime continues to exist in Mexico. These activities, their possible escalation and the violence associated with them, in an extreme case, may have a negative impactan adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

To service our debt, we have relied and may continue to rely on a combination of cash flows provided by operations, drawdowns under our available credit facilities and the incurrence of additional indebtedness. Certain rating agencies have expressed concerns regarding the total amount of our debt, our increase in indebtedness over the last several years and our substantial unfunded reserve for retirement pensions and seniority premiums, which as of December 31, 2013 was equal to approximately U.S. $85.6 billion. Due to our heavy tax burden, we have resorted to financings to fund our capital investment projects. Any lowering of our credit ratings may have adverse consequences on our ability to access the financial markets and/or our cost of financing. If we were unable to obtain financing on favorable terms, this could hamper our ability to obtain further financing as well as hamper investment in projects financed through debt. As a result, we may not be able to make the capital expenditures needed to maintain our current production levels and to maintain, as well as increase, Mexico’s proved hydrocarbon reserves, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See “—Risk Factors Related to Our Relationship with the Mexican Government—We must make significant capital expenditures to maintain our current production levels, and to maintain, as well as increase, any proved hydrocarbon reserves that may be assigned to us pursuant to Round Zero. Mexican Government budget cuts, reductions in our income and inability to obtain financing may limit our ability to make capital investments.”

Our compliance with environmental regulations in Mexico could result in material adverse effects on our results of operations.

A wide range of general and industry-specific Mexican federal and state environmental laws and regulations apply to our operations; these laws and regulations are often difficult and costly to comply with and carry substantial penalties for non-compliance. This regulatory burden increases our costs because it requires us to make significant capital expenditures and limits our ability to extract hydrocarbons, resulting in lower revenues. For an estimate of our accrued environmental liabilities, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Environmental Regulation—Environmental Liabilities.” In addition, we have agreed with third parties to make investments to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Environmental Regulation—Global Climate Change and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction.”

Item 4.Information on the Company

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT

We are the largest company in Mexico, and according to the December 12, 2011November 18, 2013 issue ofPetroleum Intelligence Weekly, we were the fourthseventh largest crude oil producer and the eleventh largest oil and gas company in the world based on data from the year 2010.2012. In 1938, President Lázaro Cárdenas del Río nationalized the foreign-owned oil companies which were then operating in Mexico, and the Mexican Congress established Petróleos Mexicanos by a decree effective on July 20, 1938. Since 1938, Mexican federal laws and regulations have entrusted Petróleos Mexicanos with a central role in the central planning and management of Mexico’s petroleum industry. On July 17, 1992, the Mexican Congress created the subsidiary entities out of operations that had previously been directly managed by Petróleos Mexicanos. Petróleos Mexicanos and its four subsidiary entities, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals andPemex-Petrochemicals, are decentralized public entities of the Mexican Government, and each is a legal entity empowered to own property and carry on business in its own name.

PEMEX’sOur executive offices are located at Avenida Marina Nacional No. 329, Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos, México, D.F. 11311, México. PEMEX’sOur telephone number is (52-55) 1944-2500.

TheAs of the date of this report, the activities of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities are regulated primarily by:

 

  

theLey Reglamentaria del Artículo 27 Constitucional en el Ramo del Petróleo (Regulatory Law to Article 27 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States Concerning Petroleum Affairs, which we also refer to as the Regulatory Law); and

 

theLey de Petróleos Mexicanos (Petróleos Mexicanos Law).

the Petróleos Mexicanos Law.

We anticipate that the regulatory regime applicable to the activities of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities will be modified significantly pursuant to the changes contemplated by the Energy Reform Decree. See “—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform” below in this Item 4.

The Regulatory Law and the Petróleos Mexicanos Law grant Petróleos Mexicanos and certain of theits subsidiary entities the exclusive right to:

 

explore, exploit, refine, transport, store, distribute and sell (first-hand) crude oil;

 

explore, exploit, produce and sell (first-hand) natural gas and transport and store natural gas, to the extent the transportation and storage activities are inextricably linked with such exploitation and production; and

 

produce, store, transport, distribute and sell (first-hand) the derivatives of petroleum (including petroleum products) and natural gas used as basic industrial raw materials that constitute basic petrochemicals, which include ethane, propane, butanes, pentanes, hexanes, heptanes, naphthas, carbon black feedstocks and methane, but, in the case of methane, only if obtained from hydrocarbons used as basic raw materials by the petrochemical industry and obtained from deposits located in Mexico.

The operating activities of Petróleos Mexicanos are allocated among the four subsidiary entities, each of which has the characteristics of a subsidiary of Petróleos Mexicanos. The principal business lines of the subsidiary entities are as follows:

 

Pemex-Exploration and Production explores for and exploits crude oil and natural gas and transports, stores and markets these hydrocarbons;

 

Pemex-Refining refines petroleum products and derivatives that may be used as basic industrial raw materials and stores, transports, distributes and markets these products and derivatives;

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals processes natural gas, natural gas liquids and derivatives that may be used as basic industrial raw materials and stores, transports, distributes and markets these products and derivatives and produces, stores, transports, distributes and markets basic petrochemicals; and

Pemex-Petrochemicals engages in industrial petrochemical processes and stores, distributes and markets petrochemicals other than basic petrochemicals.

Under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, which replaced theLey Orgánica de Petróleos Mexicanos y Organismos Subsidiarios(Organic (Organic Law of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities), the subsidiary entities were to continue to conduct business in accordance with their mandates under existing law until the President of Mexico issued a reorganization decree, based on a proposal by the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos. The Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos submitted a proposal to the President of MexicoprovidingMexico providing that the existing structure of the subsidiary entities be maintained, and on March 22,21, 2012, the President of Mexico issued theDecreto que tiene por objeto establecer la estructura, el funcionamiento y el control de los organismos subsidiarios de Petróleos Mexicanos(Decree (Decree to establish the structure, operation and control of the subsidiary entities of Petróleos Mexicanos, which we refer to as the Subsidiary Entities Decree)Mexicanos), which was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation and became effective as of that date. The Subsidiary Entities Decree,the following day. This decree consistent with the recommendation of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos, maintains the existence of the four subsidiary entities.

In 1995, the Mexican Congress amended the Regulatory Law to allow private and social sector companies, which include labor-controlled organizations and industries, to participate, with the Mexican Government’s approval, in the storage, distribution and transportation of natural gas. Pursuant to the Regulatory Law, as amended, these types of companies may construct, own and operate pipelines, installations and equipment. Since 1997, the Mexican Government has required that we divest our existing natural gas distribution assets, but has allowed us to retain exclusiveretaining authority over the exploration, exploitation, production and first-hand sale of natural gas, as well as the transportation and storage inextricably linked with this type of exploitation and production. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Private Sector Participation in Natural Gas Distribution.”

The Regulatory Law and the Petróleos Mexicanos Law have allowed us to co-generate electric energy and to enter into agreements with theComisión Federal de Electricidad (Federal Electricity Commission) to sell our excess production to this entity. The funds and the public investment projects required to carry out these co-generation works and allow the acquisition of any excess production by the Federal Electricity Commission must be included in the annualPresupuesto de Egresos de la Federación (Federal ExpendituresExpenditure Budget), which is subject to discussion by and approval of the Chamber of Deputies.

On November 13, 2008, amendments to theLey Federal de Presupuesto y Responsabilidad Hacendaria(Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability) were published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, which became effective on November 14, 2008. Under these amendments:

 

  

As of January 30, 2009, our debt related toProyectos de Infraestructura Productiva de Largo Plazo(long-term (long-term productive infrastructure projects, which we refer to as PIDIREGAS) was included in our balance sheet prepared underNormas Específicas de Información Financiera Gubernamental para el Sector Paraestatal(Mexican (Mexican Specific Standards for Governmental Financial Information for Public Sector Entities) and is now recognized as public sector debt. For Mexican FRS purposes, which was the method by which we prepared our consolidated financial statements at that time, all of our PIDIREGAS-related financing and assets were already included in our consolidated balance sheet and, therefore, these amendments did not have a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet or income statement for any period.

 

During the second half of 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos assumed, as primary obligor, all payment obligations under PIDIREGAS financing entered into by the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163, our principal PIDIREGAS financing vehicles.

In November 2008, the Petróleos Mexicanos Law was adopted by the Mexican Congress and several other laws were adopted or amended, as part of what we refer to below as the 2008 reforms.Energy Reform. None of these laws included any amendment to the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States.

PEMEX expects to benefit in several ways from the 2008 reforms. In particular, we expect to improve, among other things, our decision-making processes and our execution capabilities through the adoption of corporate governance practices in line with international standards, the creation of seven executive committees to support the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos, the appointment of professional members to the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and each of the subsidiary entities (see “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees”) and the ability to issuebonos ciudadanos (Citizen Bonds) linked to our performance.Constitution.

As a result of the 2008 reforms, we are now permitted to have a more flexible contracting structure for our core production activities. In order to strengthen our ability to enter into these contracts,Energy Reform, we are authorized to offer cash incentives to contractors that provide us with access to new technologies, faster execution or greater profits, subject to the requirements that our payment obligations under construction and services contracts must always be satisfied in cash and that in no case may we grant ownership rights over hydrocarbons to our contractors. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Exploration and Production—Integrated Exploration and Production Contracts.”

Energy Reform

On December 12, 2013, the Permanent Commission of the Mexican Congress approved amendments to Articles 25, 27 and 28 of the Mexican Constitution, which were subsequently approved by a majority of Mexico’s state legislatures and signed into law by President Peña Nieto. On December 20, 2013, the Energy Reform Decree was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation and took effect on December 21, 2013. The Energy Reform Decree includes transitional articles that set forth the general framework for the secondary legislation or implementing laws, which have not been enacted as of the date of this report.

We describe below the key features of the Energy Reform Decree that relate to the hydrocarbons sector in Mexico and our operations:

Ownership by Mexican Nation: Solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons located in the subsoil of Mexico remain the property of the Mexican nation.

Private Sector Participation: The Mexican Government will carry out the exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons in Mexico through assignments to productive state-owned companies (as described below) or through agreements with these productive state-owned companies or with private sector companies. As part of the secondary legislation to be adopted, the Mexican Congress must make the necessary adjustments to the legal framework regulating the contractual regime for exploration and extraction activities, which may include the following contractual arrangements:

licenses, pursuant to which a license holder would be entitled to the hydrocarbons once these are extracted from the subsoil;

production-sharing contracts, pursuant to which a contractor would be entitled to receive a percentage of production;

profit-sharing contracts, pursuant to which a contractor would be entitled to receive a percentage of the profit from the sale of the extracted hydrocarbons; and

service contracts, pursuant to which a contractor would receive cash payments for services performed.

The Mexican Government will have the flexibility to combine elements of these contractual frameworks in order to maximize the income attributable to the Mexican nation and thereby help ensure its long-term development. In addition, the Energy Reform Decree specifies the process by which the Mexican Government grants any such contract will be governed by rules that ensure its transparency, and information about payments made or taxes paid under any such contract will be made publicly available.

Conversion: The Energy Reform Decree provides that Petróleos Mexicanos is to be converted from a decentralized public entity to a productive state-owned company within two years from the enactment of the Energy Reform Decree, or by December 21, 2015. During the two-year transition period, we will be entitled to be awarded the assignments and contracts mentioned above. The Energy Reform Decree

provides that the corporate purpose of a productive state-owned company will be to create economic value and increase the income of the Mexican nation while adhering to principles of equity as well as social and environmental responsibility, and we will be granted technical, managerial and budgetary autonomy, subject to certain controls. The Mexican Government will continue to control Petróleos Mexicanos once it is converted to a productive state-owned company. As a productive state-owned company, Petróleos Mexicanos’ Chief Executive Officer will be appointed by the President of Mexico and its Board of Directors will consist of five representatives of the Mexican Government, including the Secretary of Energy (who will serve as Chairperson of the Board), and five independent members.

Initial Assignments and Subsequent Bidding Process: The transitional articles of the Energy Reform Decree outline a process, commonly referred to as Round Zero, for the determination of the initial allocation of rights to carry out exploration and production activities in Mexico. Round Zero is being administered by the Ministry of Energy, with technical assistance from the NHC. Pursuant to Round Zero, we have requested that the Ministry of Energy assign to us certain exploration and extraction areas in which we currently explore, operate or have an interest in developing based on our operational capabilities, as described below. Any such areas that we do not request or are not assigned to us will be subject to a competitive bidding process open to participation by private sector companies.

Booking of Reserves: Productive state-owned companies and private companies will be allowed to report assignments or contracts and the corresponding expected benefits for accounting and financial purposes, with the understanding that any solid, liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons that are in the subsoil will remain the property of the Mexican nation.

Pipeline System: The Centro Nacional de Control del Gas Natural (National Center of Natural Gas Control), a decentralized public entity of the Mexican Government, will be created to own and operate the national gas pipeline system and storage infrastructure. Pursuant to the applicable secondary legislation, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals will transfer and assign to the National Center of Natural Gas Control the assets and contracts necessary for it to manage this system and infrastructure.

Regulatory Oversight and Authority: The Ministry of Energy, the NHC and the Energy Regulatory Commission will be granted additional technical and administrative authority over certain of our operations and the energy sector generally, as described below.

The Ministry of Energy, with the technical assistance of the NHC, will have the authority to grant assignments pursuant to Round Zero, select the areas that will be subject to public bidding, establish the technical guidelines for the bidding process, as well as for the contracts themselves, and issue permits for oil refining and natural gas processing.

The NHC will be responsible for conducting the public bidding process and executing the corresponding contracts, as well as supervising oil and gas production activities.

The Energy Regulatory Commission will regulate and grant permits for the storage, transportation and distribution through pipelines of oil, gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals; regulate third-party access to transportation pipelines, as well as to the storage of hydrocarbons and their derivatives; and regulate the first-hand sale of the aforementioned products.

The NHC and the Energy Regulatory Commission will be vested with their own legal status and technical and administrative autonomy. In addition, the SHCP, as well as other government entities, will be entrusted with establishing the economic terms for contracts assigned pursuant to the public bidding process.

Safety and the Environment: The Agencia Nacional de Seguridad Industrial y de Protección al Medio Ambiente del Sector Hidrocarburos (National Agency of Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection for the Hydrocarbon Sector) will be created to regulate and supervise activities and facilities related to the hydrocarbons industry with respect to industrial safety and environmental protection. This new entity will operate as an administrative body of theSecretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources) and will, among other things,

supervise the decommissioning and abandonment of facilities. Relatedly, companies participating in the hydrocarbons sector will be subject to regulations intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help ensure that energy and natural resources are used efficiently.

Mexican Oil Fund: TheFondo Mexicano del Petróleo para la Estabilización y el Desarrollo(Mexican Petroleum Fund for Stabilization and Development) will be created and entrusted with receiving, administering and distributing the income that the Mexican Government derives from exploration and extraction activities carried out under assignments or agreements, excluding any tax revenues generated as a result of such activities. This public trust will first use the income to make the payments required pursuant to the various assignments or agreements; it will then transfer part of the income to various funds that finance public expenses and will allocate the remaining funds to long-term savings, including investments in financial assets. TheBanco de México (the Mexican central bank) will act as trustee, and the allocation of the fund’s assets will be supervised by a technical committee composed of the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Finance and Public Credit, the Governor ofBanco de México and four independent members.

Anticorruption: Modifications to the current legal framework will be made to allow for the supervision, and, if necessary, investigation and prosecution, of entities, individuals and public officials participating in the Mexican energy sector.

The impact of the Energy Reform Decree on us will largely depend on how it is implemented by the secondary legislation. On April 30, 2014, President Enrique Peña Nieto submitted to the Mexican Congress bills proposing secondary legislation intended to implement certain provisions of the Energy Reform Decree. Among other things, these proposed bills provide us with additional technical, managerial and budgetary autonomy designed to increase our production and allow us to compete effectively with other oil and gas companies that enter the Mexican energy sector.

As of the date of this report, the proposed bills are subject to review, debate and revision by the Mexican Congress, and therefore we do not know what the final scope and terms of any approved bill will be. Accordingly, we cannot currently predict the effects of the Energy Reform Decree and the new framework it contemplates, although such effects are likely to be material and impact our structure, results of operations and financial position.

Round Zero

Transitional article six of the Energy Reform Decree, which outlines the Round Zero process, required us to submit a proposal to the Ministry of Energy requesting that we be assigned the right to explore and develop areas in which we currently operate based on our technical, financial and operational capabilities. Accordingly, on March 21, 2014, we submitted to the Ministry of Energy a request that we retain rights that we believe will allow us to maintain our current production and provide sufficient exploration opportunities to increase our production in the future. Together, the areas that we requested contain 96% of Mexico’s estimated proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2013.

Exploration Areas. With respect to our exploration activities, we requested rights that we believe will allow our oil and gas production to continue to grow. Our submission sought to ensure that we maintain a number of areas that would allow us to continue our investment program in exploratory activities. Specifically, we requested to retain the right to explore offshore and onshore areas in the Southeastern basins in which we have identified opportunities that would allow us to increase production in the short-term. We also requested the right to continue to explore certain deepwater areas and areas containing unconventional deposits that we believe will allow us to increase production in the medium and long-term. The primary consideration used to determine which exploration areas to request was the continuity of our exploration strategy. Other factors that we considered included the potential hydrocarbons content and expected monetary value of the area, as well as the risks (both technical and geological) involved.

Our proposal grouped the exploration areas that we requested according to the following criteria:

Conventional onshore areas: We requested oil opportunities in which discoveries could be developed within a short amount of time (ideally less than 12 months) and gas areas that are expected to be profitable in the medium-term. We intend to pursue partnerships with the private sector in these areas only where necessary to mitigate risks and increase our operational capacity.

Shallow waters: We requested areas with oil opportunities and existing infrastructure that would allow for discoveries to be developed quickly. Given our experience in shallow waters, we do not expect to involve partners from the private sector in connection with these areas.

Deep waters: We requested areas with potential commercial opportunities in which we expect to be able to enter into partnerships with private sector companies. These partnerships would help us bear the risks and costs associated with deepwater operations and facilitate the transfer of technology and expertise.

Unconventional areas: We requested areas with potential commercial opportunities in order to be able to enter into partnerships with the private sector that will help us develop the technological capacity to exploit shale and other unconventional deposits in the future.

Production Fields. With respect to our production activities, we requested the right to continue operating our most profitable fields in order to help ensure the maintenance of our production. We also requested the right to continue developing complex and capital-intensive areas, such as deepwater fields, that we believe we can successfully operate by entering into strategic partnerships with the private sector. Altogether, we requested the right to continue operating all of the fields that are currently in production, as well as many of the fields that are being developed or are close to being developed.

Our proposal grouped the production fields that we requested according to the following criteria:

Conventional onshore fields: We primarily requested profitable fields for which we have the expertise and technology necessary to develop, as well as certain less profitable fields for strategic reasons.

Chicontepec: We requested fields that, despite their complexity, are strategically valuable due to the volume of oil and gas deposits. We also requested fields that are subject to existing contractual arrangements, including Integrated Exploration and Production Contracts (which we refer to as the Integrated E&P Contracts).

Shallow waters: We primarily requested profitable fields containing heavy, light and extra-light crude oil deposits that were already in production or under development. We also requested certain fields containing extra-heavy crude oil deposits that we are developing or will develop in the near future.

Deep waters: We requested fields that are currently under development, including fields inÁrea Perdido.

Initial Assignments. The Ministry of Energy will take the following factors into consideration when determining whether to grant us an assignment:

with respect to areas that we were actively exploring in which we had made commercial discoveries or investments as of December 21, 2013, our investment capacity and evidence of a detailed plan for exploration; and

with respect to areas that we already had under production as of December 21, 2013, our development plan for producing fields, including evidence of proper development of such fields and our ability to efficiently and competitively carry out production activities.

Although the Ministry of Energy has, in accordance with the transitional articles of the Energy Reform Decree, until September 17, 2014 to respond to our requests, the Ministry of Energy has publicly announced that

it is possible that its responses may be issued in multiple stages, beginning with areas in which we currently operate. Any areas that we do not request or are not assigned to us will be subject to a competitive bidding process. The transitional articles of the Energy Reform Decree provide that we will be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with a valuation established by the Ministry of Energy in the event that areas that we are currently operating are not assigned to us.

Once a particular area is assigned to us, we may request that the Ministry of Energy permit us to convert the assignment into one of the contractual frameworks described above. If, in connection with the conversion of an assignment, we decide to enter into an agreement with a private sector company, the NHC will conduct a public tender in a manner similar to the bidding process described above to determine who will be our partner.

Capital Expenditures and Investments

The following table shows our capital expenditures, excluding maintenance, for each of the five years ended December 31, 2011,2013, and the budget for such expenditures for 20122014 and 2013.2015. Capital expenditure amounts are derived from our budgetary records, which record such amounts on a cash basis. Accordingly, these capital expenditure amounts do not correspond to capital expenditure amounts included in our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS.IFRS.

Capital Expenditures

 

  Year ended December 31,(1)   Budget
2012
   Budget
2013
  Year ended December 31,(1) Budget
2014
  Budget
2015
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
  (in millions of pesos)(2)  (in millions of pesos)(2) 

Pemex-Exploration and Production

   Ps.  115,563     Ps.  136,102     Ps.  180,507     Ps.  194,838     Ps.  177,059     Ps.  192,953     Ps.  208,575   Ps.180,507   Ps.194,838   Ps.177,059   Ps.193,801   Ps.212,556   Ps.230,879   Ps.229,982  

Pemex-Refining

   15,979     17,380     18,526     22,636     25,157     45,930     58,871    18,526    22,636    25,157    28,944    29,794    40,699    77,744  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

   4,004     4,203     3,941     3,887     3,019     6,126     8,074    3,941    3,887    3,019    4,468    5,405    7,548    8,234  

Pemex-Petrochemicals

   1,139     1,614     2,053     2,462     2,426     4,212     15,130    2,053    2,462    2,426    2,892    4,003    5,396    6,109  

Petróleos Mexicanos

   227     439     560     206     717     700     2,137    560    206    717    943    1,707    2,189    5,554  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total capital expenditures

   Ps.  136,913     Ps.  159,738     Ps.  205,587     Ps.  224,029     Ps.  208,378     Ps.  249,921     Ps.  292,787   Ps. 205,587   Ps. 224,029   Ps. 208,378   Ps. 231,048   Ps. 253,465   Ps. 286,711   Ps. 327,623  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Includes capitalized interest during construction period for the years 2007, 2008 andyear 2009. Does not include capitalized interest for the years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2013.2015.
(2)Figures for 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 20112013 are stated in nominal pesos. Figures for 20122014 and 20132015 are stated in constant 20122014 pesos.

Source: Petróleos Mexicanos.

Total Capital Expenditures.Expenditures

The following table sets forth our total capital expenditures by project, excluding maintenance, for the five years ended December 31, 2011,2013, as well as the budget for such expenditures for 2012.2014.

Capital Expenditures

 

 Year ended December 31,(1)(2)    Year ended December 31,(1)(2) Budget
2014(3)
 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Budget
2012(3)
  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 (in millions of pesos)(4)  (in millions of pesos)(4) 

Pemex-Exploration and Production

            

Cantarell

 Ps.  21,009   Ps.  29,073   Ps.  41,002   Ps.  38,437   Ps.  36,303   Ps.  48,249  

Strategic Gas Program

  20,211    26,717    28,626    27,944    27,790    34,819  

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

 Ps.20,894   Ps.18,350   Ps.21,554   Ps.22,720   Ps.29,738   Ps.34,292  

Cantarell(5)

 41,002   38,437   36,303   42,139   28,171   24,375  

Aceite Terciario del Golfo

  4,103    8,998    20,607    28,262    21,919    15,378   20,607   28,262   21,919   20,864   20,049   5,242  

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

  32,165    21,124    20,894    18,350    21,554    22,804  

Tsimin-Xux(6)

                 13,312   20,179  

Antonio J. Bermúdez(5)(7)

 10,442   9,853   11,218   13,126   11,489   10,751  

Burgos

  12,106    13,182    19,410    29,704    19,564    11,128   19,410   29,704   19,564   17,324   10,316   9,935  

Antonio J. Bermúdez

  6,568    8,728    10,442    9,853    11,218    13,311  

Crudo Ligero Marino(6)(8)

                 10,000   13,402  

Chuc(9)

 3,469   2,619   3,730   7,870   9,897   12,245  

Ogarrio-Magallanes(7)

                 6,693   5,229  

Delta del Grijalva

  1,596    4,078    4,571    5,904    6,501    5,326   4,571   5,904   6,501   5,671   6,169   6,934  

Bellota-Chinchorro

  2,364    3,912    4,496    5,518    4,912    4,053  

Integral Poza Rica

  469    1,382    2,122    2,936    4,687    2,921  

Tamaulipas-Constituciones

  147    768    987    1,967    3,800    1,516  

Chuc

  1,931    1,702    3,469    2,619    3,730    8,205  

Jujo-Tecominoacán

  2,851    5,655    5,419    6,584    3,658    3,779  

Cactus-Sitio Grande

  669    1,069    1,127    1,384    1,995    1,885  

Cactus-Sitio Grande(6)(10)

 1,127   1,384   1,995   2,544   4,208   3,526  

Integral Yaxché

  593    1,722    4,552    3,963    1,986    4,342   4,552   3,963   1,986   2,485   3,858   8,173  

El Golpe-Puerto Ceiba

  1,492    1,924    1,706    847    1,274    2,381   1,706   847   1,274   2,691   3,708   1,438  

Arenque

  3,143    1,629    1,829    1,155    1,159    1,048  

Och-Uech-Kax

  19    100    324    1,160    1,084    979  

Veracruz Basin(6)

                 3,703   5,102  

Bellota-Chinchorro(11)

 4,496   5,518   4,912   3,101   3,607   3,356  

Jujo-Tecominoacán(5)

 5,419   6,584   3,658   3,555   3,336   2,576  

Tamaulipas-Constituciones

 987   1,967   3,800   3,313   2,736   847  

Ek-Balam

  1,114    1,406    4,143    2,766    725    1,692   4,143   2,766   725   1,023   2,549   4,752  

Caan

  682    827    1,654    1,112    658    1,407  

Lakach

 43   1,032   128   194   1,829   11,824  

Integral Poza Rica

 2,122   2,936   4,687   4,948   1,721   3,738  

Arenque(5)

 1,829   1,155   1,159   1,241   1,696   1,501  

Ixtal-Manik(6)

                 1,631   3,312  

Strategic Gas Program(5)(6)

 28,626   27,944   27,790   29,870   1,394      

Cuenca de Macuspana(6)

                 614   1,088  

Costero Terrestre(6)

                 516   903  

Och-Uech-Kax(8)

 324   1,160   1,084   964   80      

Lankahuasa(6)

                 37   1,866  

Ayín-Alux

  15    34    1,116    1,212    591    85   1,116   1,212   591   56   34   438  

Carmito-Artesa

  118    160    160    452    319    684  

Cárdenas(5)

  325    669    1,111    1,062    226      

Lakach

      152    43    1,032    128    700  

Other Exploratory Projects(6)

                      4,856  

Carmito-Artesa(10)

 160   452   319   611   30      

Caan(9)

 1,654   1,112   658   1,093   27      

Cárdenas(11)

 1,111   1,062   226   4          

Other Exploratory Projects(5)(12)(13)

             4,208   28,070   31,698  

Other Development Projects

                     463  

Administrative and Technical Support

  1,874    1,091    695    613    1,280    1,406   695   613   1,280   2,188   1,338   1,694  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  115,563    136,102    180,507    194,838    177,059    192,953   180,507   194,838   177,059   193,801   212,556   230,879  

Pemex-Refining

            

New Refinery at Tula

 39   139   60   446   5,204   3,714  

Fuel Quality Investments

          429    3,313    6,571    10,119   429   3,313   6,571   6,558   2,801   5,894  

Residual Conversion from Salamanca Refinery

 104   64   78   155   909   4,480  

Tuxpan Pipeline and Storage and Distribution Terminals

 650   823   770   597   255   347  

Minatitlán Refinery Reconfiguration

  9,257    7,156    5,159    4,633    2,850    1,357   5,159   4,633   2,850   5,366          

Tuxpan Pipeline and Storage and Distribution Terminals

          650    823    770    1,090  

Residual Conversion from Salamanca Refinery

          104    64    78    4,140  

New Refinery at Tula

          39    139    60    6,155  

Others

  6,722    10,223    12,145    13,664    14,827    23,068   12,145   13,664   14,827   15,822   20,625   26,264  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  15,979    17,380    18,526    22,636    25,157    45,930   18,526   22,636   25,157   28,944   29,794   40,699  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

            

Rehabilitation of Fire Protection Network at GPCs

 292   162   125   156   545   180  

Cryogenic Plant at Poza Rica GPC

          640    1,767    1,103    601   640   1,767   1,103   801   498   34  

Refurbishment, Modification and Modernization of Nationwide Pumping and Compression Stations

 67   39   47   134   255   376  

Preservation of Processing Capacity at the Nuevo Pemex GPC

          2    280    228    214   2   280   228   268   237   253  

Rehabilitation of Fire Protection Network at GPCs

      189    292    162    125    396  

Conservation of Operational Reliability at Poza Rica GPC

      85    294    166    92    169  

Refurbishment, Modification and Modernization of Nationwide Pumping and Compression Stations

  20    38    67    39    47    205  

Rehabilitation and Integration of Burners Venting System at Ciudad Pemex GPC

      15    252    205    31    163  

Modernization of Systems for Monitoring, Control and Supervision of Transportation by Pipeline

                  24    96  

Petrochemical Pipelines via Agave 2004

              2        585  

Infrastructure for Transportation of Petrochemical Products from Nuevo Pemex-Cactus to Coatzacoalcos

              2        472  

Modular Cryogenic Plants in Station 19 in Reynosa GPC

  1,707    1,333    275              

Others

  2,277    2,543    2,119    1,264    1,369    3,226  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  4,004    4,203    3,941    3,887    3,019    6,126  

Modernization of Areas of Transportation Products of GPCs

                 155   156  

Project of Rehabilitation and Integration of Burners Venting System at Ciudad Pemex GPC

 252   205   31   60   120   1  

 Year ended December 31,(1)(2)    Year ended December 31,(1)(2) Budget
2014(3)
 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Budget
2012(3)
  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 (in millions of pesos)(4)  (in millions of pesos)(4) 

Conservation of Operational Reliability at Poza Rica GPC

 294   166   92   126   56   22  

Modernization of Systems for Monitoring, Control and Supervision of Transportation by Pipeline

         24   79   36   352  

Integral Maintenance of Pipeline Systems for Ethane, Basic Petrochemicals and Secondary Petrochemicals

                 13   311  

Integral Project of Electric Reliability at GPCs

                     226  

Refurbishment and Modernization of Natural Gas Turbocompressors of the Cryogenic Plants at the Nuevo Pemex GPC

                     195  

Integral Maintenance of Pipeline Systems for Natural Gas and LPG Stage II

                     174  

Operational Reliability of the Pipeline Division Assets

                     57  

Refurbishment and Modernization of the Processing Systems and Equipment of La Venta GPC

                     41  

Petrochemical Pipelines via Agave 2004

     2                  

Infrastructure for Transportation of Petrochemical Products from Nuevo Pemex-Cactus to Coatzacoalcos

     2                  

Modular Cryogenic Plants in Station 19 in Reynosa GPC

 275                      

Others

 2,119   1,264   1,369   2,845   3,490   5,170  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  3,941    3,887    3,019    4,468    5,405    7,548  

Pemex-Petrochemicals

            

Modernization and Expansion of Capacity of Aromatics Train I at Cangrejera PC

  218    16    442    1,354    941    728  

Modernization and Expansion of Production Capacity of Aromatics Train I at Cangrejera PC

  442    1,354    941    777    495    10  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethylene Plant at Cangrejera PC

              20    375    125  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain IV at Morelos PC

      4    78    206    288    34  

Modernization and Expansion of Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain I at Morelos PC

  284    56    86    5    208    318  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain II at Morelos PC

  218    224    78    125    163    131  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain II at Cangrejera PC

  16    3    50    65    98      

Modernization and Optimization of Auxiliary Services Infrastructure I at Morelos PC

  57    57    45        85      

Maintaining Production Capacity, Storage and Distribution of Ammonia at the Cosoleacaque PC

                  110    440            110    441    65    18  

Modernization and Expansion of Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain I at Morelos PC

  506    507    284    56    86    30  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain IV at Morelos PC

              4    78    395  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain II at Morelos PC

      267    218    224    78    240  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives II at Cangrejera PC

  1    10    16    3    50    153  

Modernization and Optimization of Auxiliary Services Infrastructure I at Morelos PC

  6    70    57    57    45      

Maintaining Production Capacity of Auxiliary Services Infrastructure I at Pajaritos PC

      7    3    7    41    142    3    7    41    125    64      

Rehabilitation of Facilities for Physical Security at Morelos PC

      6    1    73    51    1  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Aromatics Train II at Cangrejera PC

  21    29    73    53    30    39    73    53    30    29    16    10  

Rehabilitation of Facilities for Physical Security at Morelos PC

              6    1    152  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethylene Plant at Cangrejera PC

                      157  

Expansion of Styrene Plant at Cangrejera PC

  46    16    1                1                      

Others

  341    693    958    698    966    1,736    958    698    966    1,025    2,095    4,749  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  1,139    1,614    2,053    2,462    2,426    4,212    2,053    2,462    2,426    2,892    4,003    5,396  

Petróleos Mexicanos

            

Total

  227    439    560    206    717    700    560    206    717    943    1,707    2,189  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  Ps.  136,913    Ps.  159,738    Ps.  205,587    Ps.  224,029    Ps.  208,378    Ps.  249,921   Ps. 205,587   Ps. 224,029   Ps. 208,378   Ps. 231,048   Ps. 253,465   Ps. 286,711  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

GPC = Gas Processing Complex.

PC = Petrochemical Complex.

(1)Amounts based on cash basis method of accounting.
(2)Includes capitalized interest during construction period for the years 2007, 2008, andyear 2009. Does not include capitalized interest for the years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2012.2014.
(3)Amended budget after the initial authorized budget.
(4)Figures for 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 20112013 are stated in nominal pesos. Figures for 20122014 are stated in constant 20122014 pesos.
(5)As of January 1, 2013, the Antonio J. Bermúdez, Arenque, Cantarell, Jujo-Tecominoacán and Strategic Gas Program exploratory projects, which formerly constituted an exploratory component, were designated as separate projects and funds were allocated to them as stand-alone projects.
(6)As of January 1, 2013, the Veracruz Basin, Lankahuasa, Costero Terrestre, Crudo Ligero Marino, Ixtal-Manik, Cuenca de Macuspana and Tsimin-Xux projects (projects formerly supported by the Strategic Gas Program project resources) were designated as separate projects and funds were allocated to them as stand-alone projects and the San Manuel project (a project formerly supported by the Strategic Gas Program project resources) was separated from the Strategic Gas Program and was merged into the Cactus-Sitio Grande project.
(7)As of January 1, 2013, the Ogarrio-Magallanes project was separated from the Antonio J. Bermúdez project.

(8)As of January 1, 2013, the Och-Uech-Kax project was merged into the Crudo Ligero Marino project.
(9)As of January 1, 2013, the Caan project was merged into the Chuc project.
(10)As of January 1, 2013, the Carmito Artesa project was merged into the Cactus-Sitio Grande project.
(11)As of January 1, 2012, the Cárdenas project was merged into the Bellota-Chinchorro project.
(6)(12)As of January 1, 2012, the Campeche Oriente exploratory project (a project formerly supported by Ku-Maloob-Zaap project resources) and the Comalcalco exploratory project (a project formerly supported by Bellota-Chinchorro project resources) were designated as separate projects and funds were allocated to them as stand-alone projects.
Source:(13)Petróleos Mexicanos.As of January 1, 2013, the Alosa, Chalabil, Cuichapa, Han, Holok, Lebranche, Oyamel, Pakal, Área Perdido, Tlancanán and Uchukil exploratory projects were designated as separate projects and funds were allocated to them as stand-alone projects.

Source: Petróleos Mexicanos.

Capital Expenditures Budget.Budget

The following table sets forth our approved capital expenditures budget for 20122014 and estimates for the years 20132015 through 2015.2017. These figures are subject to change in accordance with our future investment plans and the provisions of subsequent budgetary approvals.

Approved Capital Expenditures Budget

 

  Year ended December 31,(1)  Year ended December 31,(1) 
  2012   2013   2014   2015  2014 2015 2016 2017 
  (in millions of constant 2012 pesos)  (in millions of constant 2014 pesos) 

Pemex-Exploration and Production

            

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

 Ps.34,292   Ps.34,338   Ps.31,663   Ps.22,403  

Cantarell

   Ps.  48,249     Ps.  46,632     Ps.  39,669     Ps.  22,324   24,375   26,713   23,525   20,601  

Strategic Gas Program

   34,819     37,339     30,210     24,102  

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

   22,804     30,123     27,741     19,467  

Tsimin-Xux(2)(3)

 20,179   14,711   12,827   16,417  

Crudo Ligero Marino(2)(3)

 13,402   12,539   10,317   10,588  

Chuc

 12,245   12,577   13,825   13,998  

Lakach

 11,824   7,538   602   526  

Antonio J. Bermúdez(4)

 10,751   8,427   8,762   7,016  

Burgos

 9,935   3,746   3,862   8,105  

Integral Yaxché

 8,173   15,041   8,238   4,929  

Delta del Grijalva

 6,934   4,166   2,656   1,729  

Aceite Terciario del Golfo

   15,378     14,032     14,199     18,419   5,242   4,287   7,860   6,615  

Antonio J. Bermúdez

   13,311     6,924     5,033     2,548  

Burgos

   11,128     13,954     16,359     13,914  

Chuc

   8,205     10,615     6,348     735  

Delta del Grijalva

   5,326     4,909     1,803     2,109  

Integral Yaxché

   4,342     4,945     1,518     1,676  

Bellota-Chinchorro

   4,053     2,405     1,956     1,392  

Ogarrio-Magallanes(4)

 5,229   5,470   6,380   6,642  

Veracruz Basin(2)(3)

 5,102   4,449   4,513   4,859  

Ek-Balam

 4,752   4,053   4,810   4,259  

Integral Poza Rica

 3,738   2,720   1,893   1,487  

Cactus-Sitio Grande(2)

 3,526   3,133   2,914   1,758  

Bellota Chinchorro

 3,356   2,916   3,637   2,782  

Ixtal-Manik(2)(3)

 3,312   3,986   2,557   2,194  

Jujo-Tecominoacán

   3,779     3,033     3,315     1,823   2,576   1,713   1,204   2,287  

Integral Poza Rica

   2,921     1,352     1,424     651  

Lankahuasa(2)(3)

 1,866   418   41   22  

Arenque

 1,501   1,712   2,515   1,187  

El Golpe-Puerto Ceiba

   2,381     1,785     1,229     391   1,438   1,112   1,238   1,274  

Cactus-Sitio Grande

   1,885     1,235     354     240  

Ek-Balam

   1,692     4,242     1,996     1,238  

Cuenca de Macuspana(2)(3)

 1,088   825   635   193  

Costero Terrestre(2)(3)

 903   1,357   517   261  

Tamaulipas-Constituciones

   1,516     1,155     1,347     1,164   847   661   551   474  

Caan

   1,407     1,797     1,766     1,001  

Arenque

   1,048     2,236     2,552     3,738  

Och-Uech-Kax

   979     324     76     46  

Lakach

   700     10,808     5,336     578  

Carmito-Artesa

   684     309     206     188  

Ayín-Alux

   85     330     105     361   438   120   1,626   3,192  

Other Exploratory Projects

   4,856     7,138     8,378     11,647  

Other Exploratory Projects(5)

 31,698   46,832   56,853   54,049  

Other Development Projects

 463   2,385   1,707   143  

Administrative and Technical Support

   1,406     953     265     202   1,694   2,307   2,344   3,125  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   192,953     208,575     173,185     129,952   230,879   229,982   220,075   203,114  

Pemex-Refining

            

Fuel Quality Investments

   10,119     7,630             5,894   5,649          

Residual Conversion from Salamanca Refinery

 4,480   9,407   8,561   8,531  

New Refinery at Tula (pre-investment study)

   6,155     1,036     1,141     763   3,714   5,109   889   457  

Residual Conversion from Salamanca Refinery

   4,140     15,121     11,760     5,023  

Minatitlán Refinery Reconfiguration

   1,357                 

Tuxpan Pipeline and Storage and Distribution Terminals

   1,090                  347   472          

Others

   23,068     35,085     11,153     4,765   26,264   57,107   42,428   21,734  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   45,930     58,871     24,055     10,551   40,699   77,744   51,878   30,722  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

        

Cryogenic Plant at Poza Rica GPC

   601                 

Petrochemical Pipelines via Agave 2004

   585     410            

Infrastructure for Transportation of Petrochemical Products from Nuevo Pemex-Cactus to Coatzacoalcos

   472     1,168     701       

Rehabilitation of Fire Protection Network at GPCs

   396     272     721     369  

  Year ended December 31,(1)  Year ended December 31,(1) 
  2012   2013   2014   2015  2014 2015 2016 2017 
  (in millions of constant 2012 pesos)  (in millions of constant 2014 pesos) 

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

    

Refurbishment, Modification and Modernization of Nationwide Pumping and Compression Stations

 376   536          

Modernization of Systems for Monitoring, Control and Supervision of Transportation by Pipeline

 352   13          

Integral Maintenance of Pipeline Systems for Ethane, Basic Petrochemicals and Secondary Petrochemicals

 311   205   319   102  

Preservation of Processing Capacity at the Nuevo Pemex GPC

   214     288     344     415   253   375          

Refurbishment, Modification and Modernization of Nationwide Pumping and Compression Stations

   205     266     266     400  

Integral Project of Electric Reliability at GPCs

 226   212   382      

Refurbishment and Modernization of Natural Gas Turbocompressors of the Cryogenic Plants at the Nuevo Pemex GPC

 195   240   292      

Rehabilitation of Fire Protection Network at GPCs

 180              

Integral Maintenance of Pipeline Systems for Natural Gas and LPG Stage II

 174   276   256   255  

Modernization of Areas of Transportation Products of GPCs

 156   472   582   588  

Operational Reliability of the Pipeline Division Assets

 57   170   170   153  

Refurbishment and Modernization of the Processing Systems and Equipment of La Venta GPC

 41   158   188   110  

Cryogenic Plant at Poza Rica GPC

 34              

Conservation of Operational Reliability at the Poza Rica GPC

   169     10             22   3          

Rehabilitation and Integration of Burners Venting System in Ciudad Pemex GPC

   163                 

Modernization of Systems for Monitoring, Control and Supervision of Transportation by Pipeline

   96     153            

Station of Compression of the Gulf

        265            

Project of Rehabilitation and Integration of Burners Venting System in Ciudad Pemex GPC

 1              

Others

   3,226     5,242     5,793     2,514   5,170   5,574   2,935   317  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   6,126     8,074     7,825     3,698   7,548   8,234   5,124   1,526  

Pemex-Petrochemicals

            

Modernization and Expansion of Capacity of the Aromatics Train I at Cangrejera PC

   728     1,625     2,195     296  

Maintaining Production Capacity, Storage and Distribution of Ammonia at the Cosoleacaque PC

   440     75     189       

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain IV at Morelos PC

   395     220     308     230  

Modernization and Expansion of Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain I at Morelos PC

 318   799   1,249   519  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain II at Morelos PC

   240     160     623        131           68  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethylene Plant at Cangrejera PC

   157     587     79        125   201   199      

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives II at Cangrejera PC

   153     168     429     393  

Rehabilitation of Facilities for Physical Security at Morelos PC

   152     93            

Maintaining Production Capacity of Auxiliary Services Infrastructure I at Pajaritos PC

   142     38     39       

Maintaining Production Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain IV at Morelos PC

 34           83  

Maintaining Production Capacity, Storage and Distribution of Ammonia at the Cosoleacaque PC

 18   205   150      

Modernization and Expansion of Production Capacity of the Aromatics Train I at Cangrejera PC

 10   132   224   144  

Maintaining Production Capacity of Aromatics Train II at Cangrejera PC

   39     88     72        10              

Modernization and Expansion of Capacity of Ethane Derivatives Chain I at Morelos PC

   30     1,723     1,404     95  

Expansion of Styrene Plant at Cangrejera PC

        693     1,071     249  

Modernization and Optimization of Auxiliary Services Infrastructure I at Morelos PC

        135     222       

Refurbishing of Facilities for Physical Security at Morelos PC

 1   103          

Others

   1,736     9,524     7,443     2,354   4,749   4,669   4,709   6,566  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   4,212     15,130     14,074     3,618   5,396   6,109   6,532   7,380  

Petróleos Mexicanos

            

Total

   700     2,137     1,468     416   2,189   5,554   782   148  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Capital Expenditures Budget

   Ps.  249,921     Ps.  292,787     Ps.  220,607     Ps.  148,235   Ps. 286,711   Ps. 327,623   Ps. 284,391   Ps. 242,890  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

GPC = Gas Processing Complex.

PC = Petrochemical Complex.

(1)Amounts based on cash basis method of accounting.
(2)As of January 1, 2013, the Veracruz, Lankahuasa, Costero Terrestre, Crudo Ligero Marino, Ixtal-Manik, Cuenca de Macuspana and Tsimin-Xux projects (projects formerly supported by the Strategic Gas Program project resources) were designated as separate projects and funds were allocated to them as stand-alone projects and the San Manuel project (a project formerly supported by the Strategic Gas Program project resources) was separated from the Strategic Gas Program and was merged into the Cactus-Sitio Grande project.
(3)As of January 1, 2013, the Veracruz Basin, Lankahuasa, Costero Terrestre, Crudo Ligero Marino, Ixtal-Manik, Cuenca de Macuspana, Tsimin-Xux and San Manuel projects were separated from the Strategic Gas Program.
(4)As of January 1, 2013, the Ogarrio-Magallanes project was designated as a separate project from the Antonio J. Bermúdez project.
(5)As of January 1, 2013, the Alosa, Chalabil, Cuichapa, Han, Holok, Lebranche, Oyamel, Pakal, Área Perdido, Tlancanán and Uchukil exploratory projects were designated as separate projects and funds were allocated to them as stand-alone projects.

Source: Petróleos Mexicanos.

We have budgeted a total of Ps. 249.9286.7 billion in constant 20122014 pesos for capital expenditures in 2012.2014. We expect to direct Ps. 193.0230.9 billion (or 77.2%80.5% of our total capital expenditures) to exploration and production programs in 2012.2014. This significant investment in exploration and production activities reflects our focus on maximizing the potential of Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves as we begin operating under the new framework established by the Energy Reform Decree. The allocation of capital expenditures may be impacted by the Mexican Congress’ enactment of secondary legislation implementing the Energy Reform Decree.

See “—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform” in this Item 4. In addition, we continuously review our capital expenditures portfolio in accordance with our current and future business plans and upcoming opportunities.

Our main objectives for upstream investment are to maximize the long-term economic value, and to increase and improve the quality of Mexico’s oil and gas reserves, enhance Pemex-Exploration and Production’s reserves recovery ratio, improve the reliability of its production and transportation infrastructure for crude oil and natural gas operations and continue to emphasize industrial safety and environmental compliance. Our 20122014 budget objectives include increasing crude oil production from the 20112013 production level and increasing the supply of natural gas for the domestic market in the medium to long term. In addition, we plan to increase our investments in the deep waters of certain areas of the Gulf of Mexico, including Golfo de México B, Golfo de México Sur and Área Perdido, investments which are currently funded by the Cantarell project and the Lakach project and may be funded as stand-alone projects in the future.

Our downstream investment program seeks to improve the quality of our product selection and the reliability of our logistics and distribution services, to achieve a level of efficiency similar to that of our international competitors and to continue to emphasize industrial safety and environmental compliance. In addition, on August 12, 2009, with the required donation of land for the project by the government of

To this end, we are currently developing a new refinery in Tula, in the state of Hidalgo, having been completed, we announced the construction of a new refinery in Tula. The refinerywhich is expected to begin production in 2016 and to have a crude oil processing capacity of 250 thousand barrels per day.day of Maya crude oil, 163 thousand barrels per day of gasoline and 117 thousand barrels per day of diesel. See “—Business Overview—Refining—New Refinery at Tula” in this Item 4. We are also planning to renovate and upgrade ourIn addition, we announced in June 2013 that the Miguel Hidalgo refinery in Salamanca,Tula will be reconfigured to process its vacuum residue for conversion into high value fuels such as gasoline and diesel. See “—Business Overview—Refining—Vacuum Residue Processing at Miguel Hidalgo Refinery” in the state of Guanajuato.this Item 4.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Overview by Business Segment

Exploration and Production

Pemex-Exploration and Production’s primary objectives for 20122014 include: (1) increasing current crude oil production levels in order to satisfy domestic demand and have surpluses available for export; (2) maintaining natural gas production levels in order to attempt to satisfy domestic demand and avoid increasing our dependence on natural gas imports; (3) continuing to increase the replacement rate of proved and total reserves; (4) maintaining discovery and development costs similar to those of our international competitors; and (5) improving performance in terms of industrial security and environmental protection, as well as continuing to build relationships with the communities in which we operate. Our upstream investment program seeks to meet these objectives by: maximizing the value of produced reserves; improving the quality of our product selection; and improving the reliability of our logistics and distribution services to achieve an optimal level of efficiency, while continuing to emphasize industrial safety and environmental compliance.

Pemex-Exploration and Production explores for and produces crude oil and natural gas, primarily in the northeastern and southeastern regions of Mexico and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. In nominal peso terms, our capital investment in exploration and production activities decreasedincreased by 9.1%9.7% in 2011.2013. As a result of our investments in previous years, our total hydrocarbon production reached a level of approximately 3,7203,671 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2011.2013. Pemex-Exploration and Production’s crude oil production decreased by 1.0% from 20102012 to 2011,2013, averaging 2,550.12,522 thousand barrels per day in 2011,2013, primarily as a result of the decline of the Cantarell, project,Delta del Grijalva, Jujo-Tecominoacán, Ixtal-Manik and Crudo Ligero Marino projects, which was partially offset by increased crude oil production in the following projects: Ku-Maloob-Zaap, Crudo Ligero Marino, Delta del Grijalva, Ixtal Manik, YaxchéTsimin-Xux, Chuc, Ek-Balam, El Golpe-Puerto Ceiba, Burgos and Ogarrio-Magallanes.Veracruz. Pemex-Exploration and Production’s natural gas production (excluding natural gas liquids) decreased by 6.1%0.2% from 20102012 to 2011,2013, averaging 6,594.16,370.3 million cubic feet per day in 2011.2013. This decrease in natural gas production was a result of lower volumes from the Cantarell, BurgosVeracruz, Delta del Grijalva, Crudo Ligero Marino, Ixtal-Manik and VeracruzCostero Terrestre projects. Exploration drilling activity decreasedincreased by 15.4%2.7% from 20102012 to 2011,2013, from 3937 exploratory wells completed in 20102012 to 3338 exploratory wells

completed in 2011.2013. Development drilling activity decreased by 20.8%34.6% from 20102012 to 2011,2013, from 1,2641,201 development wells completed in 20102012 to 1,001785 development wells completed in 2011.2013. In 2011,2013, we completed the drilling of 1,034823 wells in total. Our drilling activity in 20112013 was focused on increasing the production of non-associated gas in the Burgos, VeracruzAceite Terciario del Golfo (or ATG) and MacuspanaOgarrio-Magallanes projects and of heavy crude oil in the Cantarell and Ku-Maloob-Zaap projects.

In 2011, our2013, the reserves replacement rate (which we refer to as the RRR) was 101.1%67.8%, which was 15.336.5 percentage points higherlower than ourthe RRR in 2010,2012, which was 85.8%104.3%.

Our well-drilling activities during 20112013 led to significant onshore and offshore discoveries. The main discoveries included heavylight crude oil reserves located in the Southeastern and Veracruz basins, specifically in the Northeastern and Southwestern Marine regions, and light crude oil reserves located in both the Southwestern MarineNorthern and Southern regions. In addition, exploration activities in the Northern region led to the discovery of additional non-associated gas reserves in the Veracruz and Burgos basins.basin. Our current challenge with respect to these discoveries is their immediate development in order to increase current production levels.

Pemex-Exploration and Production’s production goals for 20122014 include increasing its crude oil production to approximately 2.62.55 million barrels per day and maintaining natural gas production above 6.06.7 billion cubic feet per day, in order to better satisfy domestic demand for natural gas, and thus lower the rate of increase of imports of natural gas and natural gas derivatives. We aim to meet these production goals by managing the decline in field production through the application of primary, secondary and enhanced oil recovery processes, developing extra-heavy crude oil fields and accelerating production at new fields.

Refining

Pemex-Refining converts crude oil into gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, fuel oil, asphalts and lubricants. It also distributes and markets most of these products throughout Mexico, where it experiences significant demand for its refined products. At the end of 2011,2013, Pemex-Refining’s atmospheric distillation refining capacity reached 1,690 thousand barrels per day, incorporating additional capacity due to the reconfiguration of the Minatitlán refinery.day. In 2011,2013, Pemex-Refining produced 1,1901,276 thousand barrels per day of refined products as compared to 1,2291,226 thousand barrels per day of refined products in 2010.2012. The 3.2% decrease4.1% increase in refined products production was mainly due to several operational issues faced bythe startup of new plants following the reconfiguration of the Minatitlán refinery and to the improved performance of the national refining system.

Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals processes wet natural gas in order to obtain dry natural gas, LPG and other natural gas liquids. Additionally, it transports, distributes and sells natural gas and LPG throughout Mexico and produces and sells several basic petrochemical feedstocks which are used by Pemex-Refining orand Pemex-Petrochemicals. In 2011,2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ total sour natural gas processing capacity remained constant at 4,503 million cubic feet per day. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals processed 3,4454,404 million cubic feet per day of sourwet natural gas in 2011,2013, a 0.7%0.5% increase from the 3,4224,382 million cubic feet per day of sourwet natural gas processed in 2010.2012. It produced 389362 thousand barrels per day of natural gas liquids in 2011,2013, a 1.6% increase0.8% decrease from the 383365 thousand barrels per day of natural gas liquids production in 2010.2012. It also produced 3,6923,693 million cubic feet of dry gas (which is natural gas with a methane content of more than 90.5%) per day in 2011, 2.0%2013, 1.8% more than the 3,6183,628 million cubic feet of dry gas per day produced in 2010.2012.

Petrochemicals

Pemex-Petrochemicals manufactures different petrochemical products, including: (1) methane derivatives, such as ammonia and methanol; (2) ethane derivatives, such as ethylene, polyethylene, vinyl chloride monomer, ethylene oxide and ethylene oxide;glycols; (3) aromatics and their derivatives, such as styrene, toluene, paraxylene, benzene and xylene; (4) the propylene chain and its derivatives, such as acrylonitrile and propylene; (5) the petroleum derivatives chain, such as octane base gasoline and (5)heavy naphtha; and (6) other products such as oxygen, nitrogen and other products. pentanes. As of September 12, 2013, the vinyl chloride and ethylene plants at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex were divested from Pemex-Petrochemicals to become part of a joint venture between Pemex-Petrochemicals and the Mexican chemical company Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V. (which we refer to as Mexichem). See “—Petrochemicals—Joint Venture with Mexichem” in this Item 4.

Pemex-Petrochemicals’ total annual production (excluding ethane and butane gases) decreasedincreased by 8.8%15.3% in 2011,2013, from 8,9436,367 thousand tons in 20102012 to 8,1557,339 thousand tons in 2011,2013, mainly due to the business decision to

reducestartup of the new continuous catalytic regeneration reactor at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex, which increased production of gasoline componentsgasolines and gasoline blends in order to improve the economic performance of that line of business, as well as the maintenance work done to the ethylene plant in the Morelos petrochemical complex completed in 2011, which was not undertaken in the previous year. Beginning in 2010, we replaced crude oil as the raw material in our production at the aromatics sector facilities with naphtha and natural gasoline. As a result, Pemex-Petrochemicals no longer produces refined products, which consisted almost entirely of virgin stock.aromatics.

International Trading

In 2011,2013, our crude oil exports decreased by 1.7%5.3%, from 1,360.51,255.5 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 1,337.91,188.8 thousand barrels per day in 2011.2013. Natural gas imports increased by 47.6%18.4% in 2011,2013, from 535.81,089.3 million cubic feet per day in 20102012 to 790.81,289.7 million cubic feet per day in 2011.2013. In 2011,2013, exports of petrochemical products by volume decreased by 36.5%0.6%, from 697.61,344.7 thousand metric tons in 20102012 to 442.91,336.9 thousand metric tons in 2011,2013, while imports of petrochemical products by volume also decreased by 43.0%35.3%, from 394.9445.1 thousand metric tons in 20102012 to 225.0287.8 thousand metric tons in 2011.2013. In 2011,2013, exports of petroleum products by volume increased by 7.8%, from 152.6 thousand barrels per day in 2012 to 164.5 thousand barrels per day in 2013, while imports of petroleum products by volume decreased by 9.2%9.6%, from 194.5570.9 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 176.6516.2 thousand barrels per day in 2011, while imports of petroleum products by volume increased by 0.7%, from 627.9 thousand barrels per day in 2010 to 632.6 thousand barrels per day in 2011.2013.

We are a major supplier of crude oil to the United States. P.M.I. Comercio Internacional, S.A. de C.V. (which we refer to as PMI), P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. and their affiliates (which, together with PMI, we collectively

refer to as the PMI Group) providemake up our international trading arm, which provides us and a number of independent customers with international trading, distribution, risk management, insurance and relatedtransportation services. The PMI Group sells, buys and transports crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals in world markets. The PMI Group also provides us with related risk management, insurance, transportation and storage services. The PMI Group has offices in Mexico City, Houston, Singapore and Madrid. Our trading volume of exports and imports totaled U.S. $85,516.9$75,511.6 million in 2011,2013 and U.S. $81,703.1 million in 2012, including U.S. $49,325.5$42,723.2 million in crude oil exports.

exports in 2013 and U.S. $46,786.2 million in 2012.

Infrastructure of PEMEX

 

LOGOLOGO

Exploration and Production

Exploration and Drilling

We seek to identify new oil reservoirs through our exploration program in order to increase the future replacement rate of proved reserves. From 1990 to 2011,2013, we completed 10,09112,154 exploration and development wells. During 2011,2013, our average success rate for exploratory wells was 48%61% and our average success rate for development wells was 95%96%. From 20072009 to 2011,2013, we discovered 2019 new crude oil fields and 3226 new natural gas fields, bringing the total number of our crude oil and natural gas producing fields to 416454 at the end of 2011.2013.

Our 20112013 exploration program was comprised of exploration in both onshore and offshore regions, including the deep waters inof the Gulf of Mexico, where we discovered new reservoirs that represent new drilling opportunities.Mexico. These exploratory activities yielded 153.1101.8 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves in 2011.2013. A total of seventen fields were discovered, fourfive of which contain non-associated gas and threefive of which contain crude oil. In addition, within the currently producing fields, four reservoirs wereone reservoir was discovered, one of which contains non-associated gas and threegas. We continued our main seismic data acquisition activities, in particular, those related to three-dimensional seismic data. We acquired 15,063 square kilometers of three-dimensional seismic data in 2013, of which contain crude oil. Two10,111 square kilometers or 67% was in the deep waters of the Gulf

of Mexico. During 2013, no fields were delineated, a process that involves the drilling of several wells to determine the extent of the reserves found at each field. We also continued our main seismic data acquisition activities, in particular, those related to three-dimensional seismic data. We acquired 44,288 square kilometers of three-dimensional seismic data in 2011, of which 39,892 square kilometers or 90% was in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

The following table summarizes our drilling activity for the five years ended December 31, 2011,2013, all of which occurred in Mexican territory.

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 

Wells initiated(1)

   615     822     1,490     994     1,000     1,490     994     1,000     1,290     705  

Exploratory wells initiated(1)

   49     68     71     40     32     71     40     32     36     40  

Development wells initiated(1)

   566     754     1,419     954     968     1,419     954     968     1,254     665  

Wells drilled(2)

   659     729     1,150     1,303     1,034     1,150     1,303     1,034     1,238     823  

Exploratory wells

   49     65     75     39     33     75     39     33     37     38  

Productive exploratory wells(3)

   24     21     27     23     16     29     23     16     21     23  

Dry exploratory wells

   25     44     48     16     17     46     16     17     16     15  

Success rate %

   49     32     36     59     48     39     59     48     57     61  

Development wells

   610     664     1,075     1,264     1,001     1,075     1,264     1,001     1,201     785  

Productive development wells

   569     612     1,014     1,200     955     1,014     1,200     955     1,159     747  

Dry development wells

   41     52     61     64     46     61     64     46     42     32  

Success rate %(4)

   94     92     94     95     95     94     95     95     97     96  

Producing wells (annual averages)(5)

   6,280     6,382     6,890     7,476     8,315     6,890     7,476     8,315     9,439     9,836  

Marine region

   434     453     469     477     500     469     477     500     537     559  

Southern region

   926     947     1,005     1,067     1,136     1,005     1,067     1,136     1,230     1,340  

Northern region

   4,920     4,982     5,416     5,932     6,679     5,416     5,932     6,679     7,672     7,937  

Producing wells (at year end)(6)(5)

   5,942     6,247     6,814     7,414     8,271     6,814     7,414     8,271     9,476     9,379  

Crude oil

   2,884     3,127     3,713     4,382     5,139     3,713     4,406     5,193     6,188     6,164  

Natural gas

   3,058     3,120     3,101     3,032     3,132     3,101     3,008     3,078     3,288     3,215  

Producing fields

   352     345     394     405     416     394     405     416     449     454  

Marine region

   30     30     33     34     36     33     34     36     38     42  

Southern region

   87     93     97     98     99     97     98     99     101     102  

Northern region

   235     222     264     273     281     264     273     281     310     310  

Drilling rigs

   116     143     176     130     128     176     130     128     136     139  

Kilometers drilled

   1,798     2,199     3,770     2,352     2,494     3,770     2,532     2,494     3,007     1,627  

Average depth by well (meters)

   2,744     2,748     2,494     2,605     2,418     2,494     2,605     2,418     2,429     2,710  

Discovered fields(7)(6)

   14     13     13     5     7     13     5     8     9     10  

Crude oil

   4     5     6     2     3     6     2     4     2     5  

Natural gas

   10     8     7     3     4     7     3     4     7     5  

Crude oil and natural gas output by well (barrels of oil equivalent per day)

   699     621     548     508     450     548     508     448     392     371  

Total developed acreage (km2)(8)(7)

   8,132     8,088     8,376     8,463     8,536     8,376     8,463     8,536     8,652     8,706  

Total undeveloped acreage (km2)(8)(7)

   616     690     953     828     987     953     828     987     1,040     977  

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)“Wells initiated” refers to the number of wells the drilling of which commenced in a given year, regardless of when the well was or will be completed.
(2)“Wells drilled” refers to the number of wells the drilling of which was completed in a given year, regardless of when the drilling of the well commenced.
(3)Excludes non-commercial productive wells.
(4)Excludes injector wells.
(5)In March 2012, the monthly average of total producing wells, which are wells that are not only capable of production but are actually producing during the relevant period, was 9,209.
(6)All productive wells, and all other wells referred to in this table, are “net,” because we do not grant others any fractional working interests in any wells that we own; we also have not acquired any fractional working interest in wells owned by others.
(7)(6)Includes only fields with proved reserves.
(8)(7)All acreage is net because we have the exclusive right to exploit Mexico’s oil and gas reserves,i.e., we neither grant others fractional interests nor enter into other types of production sharing arrangements.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Extensions and Discoveries

During 2011,2013, we discovered new sources of crude oil and natural gas reserves in seventen fields, sixall of which were discovered onshore, foureight in the Northern region and two in the Southern region. We made one offshore field discoveryThese discoveries, along with revisions, resulted in the Southwestern Marine region. In addition, four reservoirs were discoveredincreases in currently producing fields.

Mexico’s proved reserves. During 2011,2013, in the Northeastern Marine region, revisions and the drillingcompletion of one well was completed, which23 wells led to the additionan increase of 60.5405.7 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves. In the Southwestern Marine region, revisions and the delineationdevelopment of the Tsimin fieldKuil, Kab and Yaxché fields through the drilling of the Tsimin 1-DL well12 wells led to the additionan increase of 71.5313.1 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves. In the Northern region’s Burgos, ATG, Poza Rica-Altamira and Veracruz basins,business units, the drilling of the Bragado-1, Bocaxa-1, Chancarro-1 and Gasífero-1460 development wells, as well as the discovery of a new reservoir in an existing field,eight fields, led to the addition of 17.488.6 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves. In the SabinasBurgos basin, the drilling and completion of one well, Emergente-1, was completed, whichthree wells led to the discovery of a shale oil field and two shale gas and wefields. We plan to continue to drill additional wells in this basin in order to assesscontinue assessing the potential for shale oil and gas resources in this area. Finally, in the Southern region, the drilling of the Pareto-1 and Tokal-1286 development wells and the delineationrevisions resulted in an increase of the Terra field, led to the addition of 47.796.0 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves. In sum, new discoveries of crude oil and natural gas proved reserves during 2011 led to the addition of 153.1 million barrels of oil equivalent, while activities related to extensions yieled 89.1 million barrels of oil equivalent.

In the Aceite Terciario del Golfo (or ATG) project,During 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production has contractedlaunched a call for bids for Integrated E&P Contracts relating to 12 fields in the ATG project in order to develop and exploit their hydrocarbon reserves. In July 2013, Pemex entered into Integrated E&P Contracts with five firms to installthree companies for the development of the Humapa, Miquetla and Soledad blocks. In connection with the awarding of these contracts, four field laboratories in orderthe ATG project were dismantled, which resulted in a decrease in the number of completed wells in 2013, as compared to increase production volume and2012. As of the date of this report, the only field laboratory that remains in operation is the Coyotes Laboratory, which continues to develop new production mechanisms to increase the reservoir’s productivity through technological improvements. These laboratoriesconduct development activities aimed at optimizing well productivity. The Integrated E&P Contracts entered into during 2013 are expected to improve oilsignificantly increase the number of wells drilled and gas recoverycompleted at the ATG project in the near future. For more information, see “—Integrated Exploration and lower our operating costs. The firms that have installed these field laboratories are Weatherford International Ltd., Halliburton Company, Baker Hughes Incorporated, Tecpetrol Internacional S.A. and Schlumberger Limited. The initiatives undertakenProduction Contracts” in these field laboratories in 2011 include:this Item 4.

subsurface studies through seismic inversion, a process to determine which physical characteristics of rocks and fluids produced the observed seismic record;

wells completed through multiple hydraulic fractures;

enhanced oil recovery pilot testing based on “huff and puff” (or cyclic steam) technology; and

secondary recovery pilot tests with waterflooding and high-angle wells.

Reserves

Under the PoliticalMexican Constitution of the United Mexican States and the Regulatory Law, all oil and other hydrocarbon reserves withinlocated in the subsoil of Mexico are owned by the Mexican nation and not by us. UnderAs of the Petróleos Mexicanos Law,date of this report, Pemex-Exploration and Production has the exclusive right to extract, but not own, these reserves, and to sell the resulting production. The exploration and development activities of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are limited to reserves located in Mexico.

Effective January 1, 2010, certain of the SEC’s rules were revised in order to modernize the reporting requirements applicable to companies such as PEMEX in respect of oil and other hydrocarbon reserves. The most significant of these revisions include the following:

Crude oil prices. Evaluation of the economic producibility of reserves and discounted cash flows must each now be based on a 12-month average crude oil price that is calculated by using the price on the first day of each month during the period, unless contractual arrangements designate a different price to be used.

Proved undeveloped reserves. Reserves may now be classified as proved undeveloped reserves if: (1) there is a high degree of confidence that the relevant quantities of such reserves will be recovered; and (2) the related drilling is scheduled to begin within the next five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.

Reserves estimation using new technologies. Reserves may now be estimated through the use of reliable advanced technologies in addition to those, such as flow tests and production history, previously recognized by the SEC.

Reserves estimation personnel and process. Additional disclosure is now required regarding the qualifications of those who oversee a company’s reserves estimation process. A general discussion of the internal controls used to assure the objectivity of reserves estimates is also now required.

There has been no material change in Mexico’s proved reserves as a result of the application of these revised SEC rules.

Proved oil and natural gas reserves are those estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations.

Proved reserves estimates as of December 31, 20112013 were prepared by Pemex-Exploration and Production and were reviewed by the Independent Engineering Firms (as defined below), which audit ourPemex-Exploration and Production’s hydrocarbon reserves. In addition, pursuant to theReglamento de la Ley Reglamentaria del Artículo 27 Constitucional en el Ramo del Petróleo(Regulations (Regulations to the Regulatory Law to Article 27 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States Concerning Petroleum Affairs, which we refer to as the Regulations to the Regulatory Law), the National Hydrocarbons Commission (which we refer to as the NHC)NHC reviewed and approved the proved reserves reports estimates as of December 31, 20112013 provided by Pemex-Exploration and Production. TheProduction on March 11, 2014. These reserves estimates were then registered and published by the Ministry of Energy.Energy on March 18, 2014.

Pemex-Exploration and Production estimates Mexico’s reserves based on generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation methods and procedures, which are based primarily on applicable SEC regulations and, as necessary, the Society of Petroleum Engineers’ (which we refer to as the SPE) publication entitled “Standards

Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information, dated February 19, 2007 and other SPE publications, including the SPE’s publication entitledPetroleum Resources Management System, as well as other technical sources, includingEstimation and Classification of Reserves of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Condensate, by Chapman Cronquist, andDetermination of Oil and Gas Reserves, Petroleum Society Monograph Number 1, published by the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy & Petroleum. The choice of method or combination of methods employed in the analysis of each reservoir is determined by:

 

experience in the area;

 

stage of development;

 

quality and completeness of basic data; and

 

production and pressure histories.

Reserves data set forth herein represent only estimates. Reserves valuation is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of any reserves estimate depends on the quality of available data, engineering and geological interpretation and professional judgment. As a result, estimates of different engineers may vary. In addition, the results of drilling, testing and producing subsequent to the date of an estimate may lead to the revision of an estimate.

During 2011,2013, we did not record any material increase in Mexico’s hydrocarbons reserves as a result of the use of new technologies.

In order to ensure the reliability of our reserves estimation efforts, we have undertaken the internal certification of our estimates of Mexico’s reserves since 1996. We have established certain internal controls in connection with the preparation of our proved reserves estimates. Initially, teams of geoscientists from Pemex-

ExplorationPemex-Exploration and Production’s exploration and exploitation business units (with each of these units covering several projects) prepare the reserves estimates, using distinct estimation processes for valuations relating to new discoveries and developed fields, respectively. Subsequently, the regional reserves offices collect these reserves estimates from the units and request the review and certification of such valuations and the booking of the related reserves from theGerencia de Recursos y Reservas (Office of Resources and Reserves), the central hydrocarbon reserves management body of Pemex-Exploration and Production. This internal certification process is undertaken in accordance with internal guidelines for estimating and classifying proved reserves, which are based on the SEC’s rules and definitions. The Hydrocarbons Reserves and Resources Management Office, which additionally oversees and conducts an internal audit of the above process, consists entirely of professionals with geological, geophysical, petrophysical and reservoir engineering backgrounds. The engineers who participate in our reserves estimation process are experienced in: reservoir numerical simulation; well drilling and completion; pressure, volume and temperature (PVT) analysis; NODALTM(an analytical tool used in forecasting the performance of the various elements comprising the production system) analysis; and design strategies in petroleum field development. Furthermore, all of our personnel have been certified by theSecretaría de Educación Pública(Ministry of Public Education), most have earned master’s degrees in areas of study such as petroleum engineering, geology and geophysical engineering and they possess an average of over ten years of professional experience.

In addition to the above internal review process, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s final reserves estimates are audited by independent engineering firms. Three independent engineering firms auditedPemex-Exploration and Production’s estimates of Mexico’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2011:2013: Netherland Sewell International, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Netherland Sewell);Sewell; DeGolyer and MacNaughton (D&M);MacNaughton; and Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (Ryder Scott, and,(we refer to these firms together with Netherland Sewell and D&M,as the Independent Engineering Firms). The reserves estimates reviewed by the Independent Engineering Firms totaled 98.9%99.3% of Mexico’s reserves. The remaining 1.1%0.7% of reserves consisted of reserves located in certain areas in which third parties provide drilling services to Pemex-Exploration and Production. Netherland Sewell reviewed the reserves in the Northeastern Marine region and Southern region, D&M reviewed the reserves in the Southwestern Marine region and Ryder Scott reviewed the reserves in the Northern region. Under such agreements, the corresponding third party is responsible for assessing the volume of reserves. Netherland Sewell audited the

reserves in the Northeastern Marine region and Southern region, DeGolyer and MacNaughton audited the reserves in the Southwestern Marine region and Ryder Scott audited the reserves in the Northern region. The audits conducted by the Independent Engineering Firms consisted primarily of: (1) analysis of historical static and dynamic reservoir data provided by Pemex-Exploration and Production; (2) construction or updating of the Independent Engineering Firms’ own static and dynamic reservoir characterization models of Mexican oil fields; (3) economic analysis of selected fields; and (4) review ofPemex-Exploration and Production’s production forecasts and reserves estimates.

Since reserves estimates are, by definition, only estimates, they cannot be reviewed for the purpose of verifying exactness. Instead, the Independent Engineering Firms conducted a detailed review of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s reserves estimates so that they could express an opinion as to whether, in the aggregate, the reserves estimates we furnished were reasonable and had been estimated and presented in conformity with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation methods and procedures.

All questions, including any suggested modifications to proved reserves estimates, that arose during the Independent Engineering Firms’ review process were resolved by Pemex-Exploration and Production to the satisfaction of the Independent Engineering Firms. The Independent Engineering Firms have concluded that our estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserve volumes set forth in this report are, in the aggregate, reasonable and have been prepared in accordance withRule 4-10(a) ofRegulation S-X of the SEC, as amended (which we refer to asRule 4-10(a)), are consistent with international reserves reporting practice and are in accordance with the revised oil and gas reserves disclosure provisions of the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)ASC Topic 932-10-5 “Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas” (which we refer to as Topic 932).932.

Mexico’s total proved developed and undeveloped reserves of crude oil, condensates and liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable from field processing plants decreased by 0.3%3.0% in 2011,2013, from 11,394 million barrels at

December 31, 2010 to 11,36211,424 million barrels at December 31, 2011.2012 to 11,079 million barrels at December 31, 2013. Mexico’s proved developed reserves of crude oil, condensates and liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable from processing plants decreased by 2.2%5.5% in 2011,2013, from 7,7937,790 million barrels at December 31, 20102012 to 7,6187,360 million barrels at December 31, 2011.2013. These decreases were principally due to decreased crude oilfewer positive revisions to our reserves estimates in 2013, as well as a decrease in extensions and condensates production during 2011, which was largely offset bydiscoveries, particularly in connection with the decrease in field development activities that ledat the ATG project, where the dismantling of four field laboratories resulted in a decrease in the number of wells completed, and the decrease in the number of exploratory activities carried out in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico. The amount of crude oil, condensate and liquefiable hydrocarbon reserves added in 2013 was insufficient to reclassifications from proved undeveloped, probableoffset the level of production in 2013, which amounted to 1,037 million barrels of crude oil, condensates and possible reserves to proved developed reserves, as well as exploratory additions, as described below.liquefiable hydrocarbons.

Mexico’s total proved developed and undeveloped dry gas reserves increaseddecreased by 1.9%3.5% in 2011,2013, from 12,49412,713 billion cubic feet at December 31, 20102012 to 12,73412,273 billion cubic feet at December 31, 2011.2013. Mexico’s proved developed dry gas reserves increaseddecreased by 0.2%6.2% in 2011,2013, from 7,9417,951 billion cubic feet at December 31, 20102012 to 7,9577,461 billion cubic feet at December 31, 2011.2013. These decreases were principally due to fewer positive revisions to our reserves estimates in 2013, as well as a decrease in extensions and discoveries. The amount of dry gas reserves added in 2013 was insufficient to offset the level of production in 2013, which amounted to 1,539 billion cubic feet of dry gas. Mexico’s proved undeveloped dry gas reserves increased by 4.9%1.0% in 2011,2013, from 4,5534,762 billion cubic feet at December 31, 20102012 to 4,7764,811 billion cubic feet at December 31, 2011. These increases were principally2013. This increase was primarily due to field development activities in the Burgos basin.and Veracruz basins.

Due to various field development activities performed during 2011, 1,118.4During 2013, 903.4 million barrels of oil equivalent were reclassified from proved undeveloped, probable and possible reserves to proved developed reserves, at a cost of Ps. 145,926181,670 million. Field development activities, including well drilling and completion, contributed most significantly to the reclassification of proved undeveloped, probable and possible reserves to proved developed reserves, accounting for 655.4 million barrels of oil equivalent, or 72.5%, of the total amount of reclassified reserves in 2013. The only fieldfields containing material volumes of Mexico’s proved reserves that hashave remained undeveloped for five years or more isare the Ayatsil, Ayín field. The Ayín field remainsand Alux fields, which are all located offshore. These fields remain undeveloped due to a lackdelays in

construction related to certain unique field characteristics. In particular, the design of infrastructure. Thethe development plan for the Ayatsil field, the largest of the three, has required additional time due to the complexity of this project, which is expected to represent Pemex-Exploration and Production’s first offshore project producing extra-heavy crude oil. As of the date of this report, three drilling platforms have been installed at the Ayatsil field and drilling activity is expected to begin in 2013, when the infrastructure necessary for its development is schedulednear future. We also expect to be completed.continue to develop the Ayín and Alux fields during 2014.

The following three tables of crude oil and dry gas reserves set forth our estimates of Mexico’s proved reserves determined in accordance with Rule 4-10(a).

Summary of Oil and Gas(1) Proved Reserves as of December 31, 20112013

Based on Average Fiscal Year Prices

 

  Crude Oil and Condensates(2)   Dry  Gas(3)   Crude Oil and
Condensates(2)
   Dry Gas(3) 
  (in millions of barrels)   (in billions of cubic feet)   

(in millions of

barrels)

   

(in billions of

cubic feet)

 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

    

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

    

Proved developed reserves

   7,618     7,957     7,360     7,461  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   3,744     4,776     3,719     4,811  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total proved reserves

   11,362     12,734     11,079     12,273  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)We do not currently produce synthetic oil or synthetic gas, or other natural resources from which synthetic oil or synthetic gas can be produced.
(2)Crude oil and condensate reserves include the fraction of liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable in natural gas processing plants located at fields.
(3)Reserve volumes reported in this table are volumes of dry gas, although natural gas production reported in other tables refers to sour wet gas. There is a shrinkage in volume when natural gas liquids and impurities are extracted to obtain dry gas. Therefore, reported natural gas volumes are greater than dry gas volumes.
Source:

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Crude Oil and Condensate Reserves

(including natural gas liquids)(1)

 

  2007 2008 2009 2010 2011   2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
  (in millions of barrels)   (in millions of barrels) 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

            

At January 1

   12,849    12,187    11,865    11,691    11,394     11,865    11,691    11,394    11,362    11,424  

Revisions(2)

   455    444    577    515    824     577    515    824    1,012    630  

Extensions and discoveries

   150    370    311    246    194     311    246    194    103    62  

Production

   (1,268  (1,135  (1,062  (1,059  (1,050   (1,062  (1,059  (1,050  (1,053  (1,037
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

        12,187         11,865         11,691         11,394         11,362     11,691    11,394    11,362    11,424    11,079  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Proved developed reserves at December 31

   8,436    8,618    8,167    7,793    7,618     8,167    7,793    7,618    7,790    7,360  

Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31

   3,751    3,247    3,524    3,601    3,744     3,524    3,601    3,744    3,634    3,719  

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Crude oil and condensate reserves include the fraction of liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable in natural gas processing plants located at fields.
(2)Revisions include positive and negative changes due to new data from well drilling, and revisions made when actual reservoir performance differs from expected performance.
Source:Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Dry Gas Reserves

 

  2007 2008 2009 2010 2011   2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
  (in billions of cubic feet)   (in billions of cubic feet) 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

            

At January 1

   13,856    13,162    12,702    11,966    12,494     12,702   11,966   12,494   12,734   12,713  

Revisions(1)

   879    730    504    1,449    1,592     504   1,449   1,592   1,377   1,010  

Extensions and discoveries

   171    454    404    770    249     404   770   249   162   89  

Production(2)

   (1,744  (1,643  (1,644  (1,691  (1,601   (1,644 (1,691 (1,601 (1,560 (1,539
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

        13,162         12,702         11,966         12,494         12,734     11,966    12,494    12,734    12,713    12,273  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Proved developed reserves at December 31

   8,163    8,206    7,586    7,941    7,957     7,586    7,941    7,958    7,951    7,461  

Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31

   4,999    4,496    4,380    4,553    4,776     4,380    4,553    4,776    4,762    4,811  

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Revisions include positive and negative changes due to new data from well drilling, and revisions made when actual reservoir performance differs from expected performance.
(2)Production refers here to dry gas, although natural gas production reported in other tables refers to sour wet gas. There is a shrinkage in volume when natural gas liquids and impurities are extracted to obtain dry gas. Therefore, reported natural gas volumes are greater than dry gas volumes.
Source:

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2011,2013, the volumes of proved developed and undeveloped reserves, the number of producing wells and the number of proved undeveloped locations for the fields that contained 88%89% of Mexico’s proved reserves.

 

  Reserves         
      Number of
Producing
Wells
   Number of
Undeveloped
Locations(2)
 

Field

 Proved  Reserves(1) Developed
Reserves(1)
 Undeveloped
Reserves(1)
 Number of
Producing Wells
 Number of Undeveloped
Locations(2)
   Proved(1)   Developed(1)   Undeveloped(1)   
 (in millions of barrels of oil equivalent)       (in millions of barrels of oil equivalent)         

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

  3,114.2    2,568.1    546.1    143    23     3,115.8     2,660.6     455.2     172     22  

Akal

  1,888.3    1,888.3    0.0    153    0     1,666.2     1,666.2     0.0     140     0  

Antonio J. Bermudez(3)

  1,441.2    684.5    756.7    110    49  

Antonio J. Bermúdez(3)

   1,323.8     599.6     724.2     264     150  

Aceite Terciario del Golfo

  743.0    191.4    551.7    2,002    6,085     806.3     260.6     545.7     2,675     5,545  

Jujo-Tecominoacán

  652.2    444.8    207.4    43    23     636.2     436.5     199.7     42     22  

Tsimin

  433.9    0.0    433.9    0    22     498.1     186.0     312.1     7     19  

Ayatsil

  315.3    0.0    315.3    0    17     316.7     0.0     316.7     0     17  

Kayab

   184.3     0.0     184.3     0     8  

Sihil

   177.9     124.2     53.7     21     8  

Ixtal

   167.8     104.7     63.0     11     6  

Pit

   151.5     0.0     151.5     0     12  

May

   132.4     105.8     26.6     16     6  

Ek

   127.2     63.9     63.4     15     14  

Kuil

   117.2     86.4     30.8     6     3  

Xux

   112.5     0.0     112.5     0     12  

Lakach

   103.2     0.0     103.2     0     5  

Costero

   102.0     86.1     16.0     12     3  

Sinán

   99.9     68.1     31.9     14     8  

Caparroso-Pijije-Escuintle

  168.7    152.0    16.7    20    1     94.3     69.3     25.0     14     4  

Ixtal

  166.4    145.1    21.3    12    5  

May

  160.9    133.3    27.6    13    7  

Terra

   88.8     50.3     38.5     7     11  

Sen

  158.9    144.2    14.7    20    5     85.6     58.7     26.9     14     6  

Costero

  144.8    144.8    0.0    10    0  

Kayab

  144.3    0.0    144.3    0    8  

Pit

  135.0    0.0    135.0    0    5  

Xanab

  127.1    67.1    60.0    4    8     84.9     48.1     36.9     5     9  

Sihil

  119.6    102.4    17.2    14    3  

Sinán

  117.6    101.7    16.0    14    4  

Xux

  114.1    0.0    114.1    0    7  

Ek

  109.1    46.0    63.1    14    6  

Lakach

  103.2    0.0    103.2    0    5  

Bricol

  90.3    34.3    55.9    4    6  

Arenque

   78.2     30.5     47.6     15     10  

Homol

   74.2     46.4     27.8     6     4  

Cárdenas

  80.5    58.1    22.4    12    7     71.7     57.3     14.4     12     4  

Arenque

  78.9    32.7    46.2    15    10  

Yaxché

  75.5    31.0    44.5    7    12  

Ogarrio

  72.5    44.8    27.7    74    34  

Bolontikú

  69.8    40.0    29.9    6    8  

Bellota

  68.0    44.5    23.5    8    4  

Homol

  68.0    35.6    32.3    5    6  

Mora

  60.6    47.5    13.1    8    3  

Chuc

  59.6    56.4    3.2    16    0  

Puerto Ceiba

  57.1    38.2    18.9    13    6  

Tamaulipas Constituciones

  54.9    29.6    25.2    322    124  

Teotleco

  49.6    37.7    12.0    5    3  

Balam

  45.9    40.6    5.3    3    1  

Cactus

  45.8    22.2    23.6    18    0  

Cauchy

  42.9    42.0    0.8    36    3  

San Ramón

  42.3    30.1    12.1    51    15  

Chiapas-Copanó

  41.5    41.5    0.0    11    0  

Ayín

  41.2    0.0    41.2    0    3  

Caan

  39.7    39.7    0.0    15    0  

Terra

  37.6    24.1    13.6    3    3  

Arcabuz-Culebra

  34.4    25.9    8.5    597    70  

Nejo

  33.3    20.2    13.1    129    46  

Poza Rica

  33.3    28.6    4.7    218    17  

Onel

  33.2    0.0    33.2    0    5  

Abkatún

  32.4    32.4    0.0    9    0  

Paredón

  31.2    13.5    17.7    3    1  

  Reserves       
    Number of
Producing
Wells
   Number of
Undeveloped
Locations(2)
 

Field

 Proved  Reserves(1) Developed
Reserves(1)
 Undeveloped
Reserves(1)
 Number of
Producing Wells
 Number of  Undeveloped
Locations(2)
  Proved(1) Developed(1) Undeveloped(1)   
 (in millions of barrels of oil equivalent)     (in millions of barrels of oil equivalent)       

Bricol

   71.7   30.2   41.5   7     7  

Onel

   67.4   31.3   36.1   2     5  

Chuc

   62.4   59.3   3.2   16     0  

Balam

   59.7   31.5   28.2   7     1  

Abkatún

   58.0   57.7   0.2   13     0  

Mora

   56.8   46.6   10.2   7     4  

Puerto Ceiba

   56.6   33.1   23.5   21     20  

Pareto

   54.8   33.2   21.6   4     5  

Ogarrio

   54.2   47.4   6.8   115     17  

Bellota

   52.3   34.0   18.4   7     5  

Teotleco

   51.3   41.1   10.2   11     3  

Tizón

  27.8    27.8    0.0    7     0   50.8   39.7   11.1   9     4  

Papán

  27.4    27.4    0.0    21     0

Cinco Presidentes

  26.6    21.1    5.5    36     8

Bolontikú

   49.4   32.0   17.4   7     4  

Ébano Pánuco Cacalilao

   49.2   19.2   30.1   389     356  

Edén-Jolote

   48.3   26.8   21.5   8     9  

Tamaulipas Constituciones

   45.3   20.2   25.0   353     110  

Yaxché

   43.5   27.1   16.5   10     7  

Kab

   41.5   20.5   20.9   7     8  

Gasífero

   39.6   16.9   22.7   14     20  

Madrefil

   36.7   17.8   18.9   2     1  

Cuervito

   36.6   16.6   20.0   89     65  

Poza Rica

   35.4   32.3   3.1   120     15  

Eltreinta

   34.2   1.3   32.9   1     16  

Sunuapa

   33.9   30.9   2.9   13     1  

San Ramón

   30.9   25.0   5.9   62     15  

Caan

   30.3   30.3   0.0   14     0  

Chinchorro

  24.9    21.5    3.4    4     1   29.9   21.0   8.9   4     4  

Santuario

   29.5   24.6   4.9   20     20  

Cuitláhuac

  24.6    18.0    6.5    189   28   29.0   17.6   11.3   209     26  

Lum

  24.0    12.2    11.8    0     2   27.0   14.4   12.6   2     4  

Nejo

   24.1   22.5   1.6   235     14  

Arcabuz-Culebra

   22.7   16.9   5.8   607     51  

Yagual

  22.4    19.6    2.9    7     1   22.7   14.0   8.7   5     4  

Cráter

  21.4    21.4    0.0    4     0

Cinco Presidentes

   19.5   16.5   3.0   50     9  

Rodador

  19.7    18.6    1.2    23     2   19.2   18.0   1.2   38     8  

Lizamba

  19.6    18.6    1.0    39     1

Magallanes-Tucán-Pajonal

  18.2    14.9    3.3    45     7   18.9   10.8   8.1   62     8  

Pol

  17.3    17.3    0.0    8     0

Tekel

  16.5    0.0    16.5    0     1   16.5   0.0   16.5   0     1  

Narváez

  12.8    12.8    0.0    10     0

Fundador

  8.2    8.2    0.0    35     0

Arcos

  7.6    7.4    0.2    123     2

Velero

  7.2    5.8    1.4    117   10

Tintal

   15.5   4.1   11.4   6     10  

Paredón

   15.2   11.7   3.5   4     1  

Papán

   14.8   13.8   1.0   18     1  

Cauchy

   14.7   14.5   0.2   31     1  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  12,104.1    7,977.6    4,126.5            4,828              6,733                    11,986.8    7,831.8    4,155.0    6,067.0     6,768.0  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Mexico’s proved reserves

          13,810.3            9,148.0            4,662.3       13,438.5    8,794.9    4,643.6     

Percentage

  88%    87%    89%       89  89  89   

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Proved reserves, developed reserves and undeveloped reserves are expressed in millions of barrels of oil equivalent. To convert dry gas to barrels of oil equivalent, a factor of 5.201 thousand cubic feet of dry gas per barrel of oil equivalent is used.
(2)Undeveloped Locations refers to the number of geographic sites or locations where a well will be drilled to produce undeveloped proved reserves.
(3)Includes the Cunduacán, Iride, Oxiacaque, Platanal and Samaria fields.
Source:Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Pemex-Exploration and Production’s RRR has steadily improved over recent years. The RRR for a given period is calculated by dividing the sum of proved reserves additions due to discoveries, developments, delineations and revisions by that period’s total production. In 2011,2013, the RRR was 101.1%67.8%, which was 15.336.5 percentage points higherlower than the 20102012 RRR of 85.8%, and represented104.3%. The fact that the highest rate attained since our adoption of Rule 4-10(a).RRR was less than 100% in 2013 represents a decline in Mexico’s proved reserves during this period. This increasedecrease in ourthe RRR was mainly due to a significant decrease in the reclassificationamount of proved reserves that were added as a result of discoveries, extensions and positive revisions in 2013 as compared to 2012. Specifically, lower levels of field development revisions of reservoir pressure-production behavior and field delineation, undertaken largelyactivities in the Maloob, Ku, Tsimin, May, Pijije, Costero fields,ATG project as well as the decrease in the Aceite Terciario del Golfo Project. Moreover,number of exploratory activities carried out in the additiondeep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, where the lack of infrastructure precluded us from booking proved reserves, due to discoveries also contributed to the increasedecrease in our RRR.RRR in 2013.

Our goal is to continue to increase ourthe RRR during 2012,2014, in part by increasing Mexico’s proved reserves over the coming years. We aim to accomplish this primarily through development of the Ku-Maloob-Zaap, Crudo Ligero Marino and Aceite Terciario del GolfoATG projects, as well as through the performance of delineation activities. We have developed these objectives based on reserves estimates, which are subject to the uncertainty and risks associated with hydrocarbon exploration and production activities. Additionally, future decisions regarding authorized exploration and exploitation investment levels may lead to related changes.

Our reserves production ratio, which is presented in terms of years, is calculated by dividing the estimated remaining reserves at the end of the relevant year by the total production of hydrocarbons for that year. As of December 31, 2011,2013, this ratio was equal to 10.210.1 years for proved reserves, which represents an increasea decrease of 2.0%1.0% as compared to the 20102012 reserves production ratio of 10.010.2 years for proved reserves.

For more information, see Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Sales Prices and Production Costs

The following table sets forth our average sales price per unit of oil and gas produced and our average production cost per unit of production, in the aggregate and for each field containing 15% or more of Mexico’s proved reserves.

Unit Sales Prices and Production Costs(1)

 

  Ku-Maloob-Zaap   Akal   Other Fields   All Fields  Ku-Maloob-Zaap Akal Other Fields All Fields 
  (in U.S. dollars)  (in U.S. dollars) 

Year ended December 31, 2011

        

Year ended December 31, 2013

    

Average sales prices

            

Crude oil, per barrel

  U.S.  $92.71    U.S.  $97.69    U.S.  $105.45    U.S.  $100.01   U.S. $92.50   U.S. $98.72   U.S. $104.62   U.S. $99.92  

Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet

  U.S.  $4.78    U.S.  $4.47    U.S.  $4.72    U.S.  $4.68   U.S. $5.03   U.S. $4.95   U.S. $5.00   U.S. $4.93  

Average production costs, per barrel of oil equivalent

  U.S.  $4.59    U.S.  $6.70    U.S.  $6.32    U.S.  $6.12   U.S. $4.88   U.S. $11.01   U.S. $10.79   U.S. $7.91  

Year ended December 31, 2010

        

Year ended December 31, 2012

    

Average sale prices

            

Crude oil, per barrel

  U.S.  $66.76    U.S.  $69.85    U.S.  $76.21    U.S.  $72.25   U.S. $95.53   U.S. $100.96   U.S. $106.55   U.S. $102.36  

Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet

  U.S.  $5.06    U.S.  $4.20    U.S.  $4.55    U.S.  $4.52   U.S. $4.18   U.S. $4.11   U.S. $4.18   U.S. $4.03  

Average production costs, per barrel of oil equivalent

  U.S.  $4.06    U.S.  $7.36    U.S.  $5.28    U.S.  $5.22   U.S. $4.86   U.S. $9.11   U.S. $6.88   U.S. $6.84  

Year ended December 31, 2009

        

Year ended December 31, 2011

    

Average sale prices

            

Crude oil, per barrel

  U.S.  $52.18    U.S.  $54.29    U.S.  $58.02    U.S.  $55.41   U.S. $92.71   U.S. $97.69   U.S. $105.45   U.S. $100.01  

Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet

  U.S.  $4.60    U.S.  $4.78    U.S.  $3.83    U.S.  $4.06   U.S. $4.78   U.S. $4.47   U.S. $4.72   U.S. $4.68  

Average production costs, per barrel of oil equivalent

  U.S.  $3.77    U.S.  $5.48    U.S.  $5.10    U.S.  $4.85   U.S. $4.59   U.S. $6.70   U.S. $6.32   U.S. $6.12  

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Average of sales prices as of the last day of each month of the year.
Source:Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

In 2011,2013, our average production cost was U.S. $6.12$7.91 per barrel of oil equivalent, and represented an increase of 17.2%15.6%, as compared to our average production cost of U.S. $5.22$6.84 per barrel in 2010.2012. This increase resulted primarily from a 35%19.4% net increase in the costs associated with the maintenance of wells and related equipment and facilities and other costs, such asincluding fees for general services a 1.7% appreciation in the annual average value of the Mexican peso in dollar terms and a 1.9%1.5% decrease in total hydrocarbons production in 20112013 as compared to 2010,2012, from 1,3841,353 million barrels of oil equivalent in 20102012 to 1,3581,333 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2011.2013.

Pemex-Exploration and Production calculates and discloses our production costs pursuant to international practices, which are based on U.S. GAAP under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)ASC Topic 932 “Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas.”932. In accordance with ASC Topic 932, the production cost per barrel of oil equivalent is calculated by dividing total production expenses (in U.S. dollars) by total production of hydrocarbons (in barrels of oil equivalent) for the relevant period.

Our total production cost consists of all direct and indirect costs incurred to produce crude oil and gas, including costs associated with the operation and maintenance of wells and related equipment and facilities. In addition, it includes costs of labor to operate the wells and facilities, the costs of materials, supplies and fuel consumed, including gas used for gas lifting, nitrogen and other chemicals, repair and non-capitalized maintenance costs, and other costs, such as fees for general services, a labor fund for active personnel, corporate services and indirect overhead. However, it excludes non-cash expenses such as amortization of capitalized well expenses, the depreciation of fixed assets, expenses associated with the distribution and handling of hydrocarbons and other expenses that are related to exploration and drilling activities.

Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production

In 2011,2013, we produced an average of 2,5502,522 thousand barrels per day of crude oil, 1.0% less than our average daily production in 20102012 of 2,5762,548 thousand barrels per day of crude oil. The decrease in 20112013 was equal togreater than the decrease in 2010,2012, and resulted primarily from the declinedecrease of production in the Cantarell, project, which was only partially offset by an increase in crude oil production in the Ku-Maloob-Zaap, Delta del Grijalva, Yaxché,Jujo-Tecominoacán, Ixtal-Manik and Ogarrio-Magallanes projects to maintain our production levels.Crudo Ligero Marino projects. Accordingly, our average production of heavy crude oil decreased by 4719.9 thousand barrels per day, to 3.2%or 1.4% less than the average daily production in 2010; however,2012; additionally, our average light and extra-light crude oil production during 2011 increased2013 decreased by 215.8 thousand barrels per day, or a 1.9% increase0.5% decrease as compared to 2010.2012.

Crude oil can be classified by its sulfur content. “Sour” or heavy crude oil contains 3.4% or greater sulfur content by weight and “sweet” or light crude oil contains less than 1.0% sulfur content by weight. Most of our production is classified as sour or heavy crude oil.

Pemex-Exploration and Production produces four types of crude oil:

 

Altamira, a heavy crude oil;

 

Maya, a heavy crude oil;

 

Isthmus, a light crude oil; and

 

Olmeca, an extra-light crude oil.

Most of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s production consists of Isthmus and Maya crude oil. In 2011, 55.6%2013, 54.1% of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s total production of crude oil consisted of heavy crude oil and 44.4%45.9% consisted of light and extra-light crude oil. The Marine regions yield mostly heavy crude oil (69.5%(66.4% of these regions’ production in 2011)2013), although significant volumes of light crude oil are also produced there (30.5%(33.6% of these regions’ production in 2011)2013). The Southern region yields mainly light and extra-light crude oil (together, 96.9%94.5% of this region’s production in 2011)2013), and the Northern region yields both heavy crude oil (66.8%(55.3% of this region’s production in 2011)2013) and light and extra-light crude oil (33.2%(44.7% of this region’s production in 2011)2013).

The most productive crude oil and natural gas fields in the Gulf of Mexico are located in the Ku-Maloob-Zaap and Cantarell business units in the Northeastern Marine region, and in the Ixtal, Xanab, Yaxché, Chuc Caan, Sinán and IxtalHomol fields in the Southwestern Marine region. In particular, the Ku-Maloob-Zaap business unit was the most important crude oil producer in 2011,2013, producing an average of 842863.8 thousand barrels per day of crude oil in 2011,2013, or 33%34.2% of our total crude oil production for the year, and 331405.1 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, or 5.0%6.4% of our total natural gas production for the year. Our second most important business unit, the Cantarell business unit, produced an average of 500.7439.8 thousand barrels per day of crude oil in 2011,2013, or 19.6%17.4% of our total crude oil production for the year, and an average of 1,0751,007.1 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, or 16.3%15.8% of our total natural gas production for the year.

The following table sets forth our annual crude oil production rates by type of oil for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Crude Oil Production

   

 

   2011
vs.  2010
 
   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   
   (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%) 

Marine regions

            

Heavy crude oil

   1,975.7     1,701.8     1,446.1     1,380.4     1,322.8     (4.2

Light crude oil(1)

   547.9     544.0     564.4     561.2     580.5     3.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   2,523.6     2,245.8     2,010.4     1,941.6     1,903.3     (2.0

Southern region

            

Heavy crude oil

   10.7     11.1     13.3     16.8     16.7     (0.6

Light crude oil(1)

   454.5     447.6     484.5     515.1     513.9     (0.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   465.2     458.7     497.7     531.9     530.6     (0.2

Northern region

            

Heavy crude oil

   53.0     52.8     60.7     66.7     77.6     16.3  

Light crude oil(1)

   33.9     34.3     32.7     35.7     38.6     8.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   86.9     87.1     93.3     102.4     116.2     13.5  

Total heavy crude oil

   2,039.4     1,765.7     1,520.0     1,464.0     1,417.1     (3.2

Total light crude oil(1)

   1,036.3     1,025.9     1,081.5     1,111.9     1,133.0     1.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total crude oil

   3,075.7     2,791.6     2,601.5     2,575.9     2,550.1     (1.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   2013
vs. 2012
 
   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
   (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%) 

Marine regions

            

Heavy crude oil

   1,446.1     1,380.5     1,322.8     1,280.2     1,258.3     (1.7

Light crude oil(1)

   564.4     561.2     580.5     614.5     638.1     3.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   2,010.4     1,941.6     1,903.3     1,894.6     1,896.4     0.1  

Southern region

            

Heavy crude oil

   13.3     16.8     16.7     18.5     26.5     43.2  

Light crude oil(1)

   484.5     515.1     513.9     489.6     454.3     (7.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   497.7     531.9     530.6     508.2     480.8     (5.4

Northern region

            

Heavy crude oil

   60.7     66.7     77.6     86.3     80.2     (7.1

Light crude oil(1)(2)

   32.7     36.8     41.2     58.8     64.7     10.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   93.3     103.6     118.8     145.1     144.9     (0.1

Total heavy crude oil

   1,520.0     1,464.0     1,417.1     1,385.0     1,365.1     (1.4

Total light crude oil(1)

   1,081.5     1,113.0     1,135.5     1,162.9     1,157.1     (0.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total crude oil

   2,601.5     2,577.0     2,552.6     2,547.9     2,522.1     (1.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Includes extra-light crude oil.
(2)Since 2010, includes extra-light crude oil from the Nejo field in the Burgos business unit.

Source: Source:Pemex-Exploration and Production.

The following table sets forth our annual crude oil production by region and business unit for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Crude Oil Production

   

 

   2011
vs.  2010
 
   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   
   (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%) 

Marine regions

            

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

   527.2     706.0     808.0     839.2     842.0     0.3  

Cantarell

   1,490.5     1,039.5     684.8     558.0     500.7     (10.3

Litoral de Tabasco

   193.6     192.2     212.3     248.1     284.4     14.6  

Abkatún-Pol-Chuc

   312.3     308.1     305.4     296.3     276.2     (6.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   2,523.6     2,245.8     2,010.4     1,941.6     1,903.3     (2.0

Southern region

            

Samaria-Luna

   186.7     184.7     199.9     217.5     222.7     2.4  

Bellota-Jujo

   190.0     174.8     172.2     160.3     143.4     (10.5

Cinco Presidentes

   44.6     47.3     56.6     71.7     83.5     16.5  

Muspac

   33.6     36.1     42.1     49.5     48.5     (2.0

Macuspana

   10.4     15.7     27.1     32.9     32.5     (1.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   465.2     458.7     497.7     531.9     530.6     (0.2

Northern region

            

Poza Rica-Altamira

   85.1     55.7     59.1     56.5     60.2     6.5  

Aceite Terciario del Golfo

        29.3     29.5     41.0     52.8     28.8  

Veracruz

   1.8     2.1     4.6     4.9     3.2     (34.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   86.9     87.1     93.3     102.4     116.2     13.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total crude oil

   3,075.7     2,791.6     2,601.5     2,575.9     2,550.1     (1.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   2013
vs. 2012
 
   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
   (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%) 

Marine regions

            

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

   808.0     839.2     842.1     855.1     863.8     1.0  

Cantarell

   684.8     558.0     500.7     454.1     439.8     (3.1

Litoral de Tabasco

   212.3     248.1     284.4     319.2     299.2     (6.3

Abkatún-Pol-Chuc

   305.4     296.3     276.2     266.3     293.6     10.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   2,010.4     1,941.6     1,903.3     1,894.6     1,896.4     0.1  

Southern region

            

Samaria-Luna

   199.9     217.5     222.7     205.1     172.5     (15.9

Bellota-Jujo

   172.2     160.2     143.4     130.3     134.3     3.1  

Cinco Presidentes

   56.6     71.7     83.5     96.0     93.1     (3.0

Macuspana-Muspac(1)

   69.1     82.4     81.1     76.8     80.9     5.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   497.7     531.9     530.6     508.2     480.8     (5.4

Northern region

            

Aceite Terciario del Golfo

   29.5     41.0     52.8     68.6     66.2     (3.5

Poza Rica-Altamira

   59.1     56.5     60.2     67.8     61.5     (9.3

Burgos(2)

   n.a.     1.2     2.5     4.8     8.0     66.7  

Veracruz

   4.6     4.9     3.2     4.0     9.3     132.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   93.3     103.6     118.8     145.1     144.9     (0.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total crude oil

   2,601.5     2,577.0     2,552.6     2,547.9     2,522.1     (1.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)As of 2012, the Macuspana and Muspac business units were merged into the Macuspana-Muspac business unit.
(2)As of February 2010, the Burgos business unit includes the hydrocarbons production from the Nejo field.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

The Marine regions, which are comprised of the Northeastern Marine region and the Southwestern Marine region, are located on the continental shelf and its slope in the Gulf of Mexico. They cover a surface area of approximately 550,000 square kilometers, located entirely within Mexican territorial waters, along the coast of the states of Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatán, Quintana Roo and the southern coast of the state of Veracruz. In 2011,2013, the average crude oil production from the 3642 fields located in these regions was 1,903.31,896.4 thousand barrels per day.

The Southern region covers an area of approximately 392,000 square kilometers, including the states of Guerrero, Oaxaca, Chiapas, Tabasco, Yucatán, Quintana Roo, Campeche and Veracruz. In 2011,2013, the average crude oil production from the 93102 fields located in this region was 530.6480.8 thousand barrels per day.

The Northern region, including its offshore area, is located on the continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico along the coast of the state of Tamaulipas and the northern coast of the state of Veracruz. It covers an area of approximately 1.8 million square kilometers. Our production area in the onshore portion of this region is located in, among others, the states of Veracruz, Tamaulipas, Nuevo León, Coahuila, San Luis Potosí and Puebla; we also produce offshore on the continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. In 2011,2013, the average crude oil and natural gas production in the Northern region totaled 116.2144.9 thousand barrels of crude oil per day and 2,287.92,060.6 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, respectively, from the 308310 oil and gas fields in this region.

The following table sets forth our annual natural gas production by region and business unit for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Natural Gas Production

 

  

 

   2013
vs. 2012
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2011
vs. 2010
   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
  (in millions of cubic feet per day)   (%)   (in millions of cubic feet per day)   (%) 

Marine regions

                        

Cantarell

   944.9     1,628.5     1,455.3     1,251.9     1,074.7     (14.2   1,455.3     1,251.9     1,074.7     1,004.2     1,007.1     0.3  

Litoral de Tabasco

   448.4     453.9     531.3     577.5     649.3     12.4     531.3     577.6     649.3     735.6     747.6     1.6  

Abkatún-Pol-Chuc

   544.2     569.0     580.2     594.2     559.0     (5.9   580.2     594.2     559.0     523.6     579.4     10.7  

Ku-Maloob-Zaap

   212.2     272.8     327.2     331.8     330.9     (0.3   327.2     331.8     330.9     329.7     405.1     22.9  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   
   2,149.7     2,924.2     2,894.0     2,755.4     2,613.9     (5.1

Total

   2,894.0     2,755.4     2,613.9     2,593.1     2,739.2     5.6  

Southern region

                        

Samaria-Luna

   517.6     572.4     678.6     773.9     715.7     (7.5   678.6     773.9     715.7     695.9     606.3     (12.9

Macuspana

   223.1     260.5     312.4     306.5     292.4     (4.6

Macuspana-Muspac(1)

   591.0     580.0     571.5     542.9     515.1     (5.1

Bellota-Jujo

   239.6     250.7     260.8     305.9     288.2     (5.8   260.8     305.9     288.2     297.4     319.7     7.5  

Muspac

   310.9     299.5     278.6     273.5     279.1     2.0  

Cinco Presidentes

   61.4     67.5     69.2     104.9     116.9     11.4     69.2     104.9     116.9     116.3     129.4     11.3  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   1,599.6     1,764.7     1,692.3     1,652.4     1,570.5     (5.0

Northern region

            

Burgos(2)

   1,515.2     1,478.4     1,344.1     1,269.3     1,286.6     1.4  

Veracruz

   809.6     818.9     716.7     601.2     494.5     (17.7

Aceite Terciario del

            

Golfo

   78.7     85.3     111.9     148.8     167.0     12.2  

Poza Rica-Altamira

   133.5     117.3     115.2     120.0     112.4     (6.3
   1,352.8     1,450.6     1,599.6     1,764.7     1,692.3     (4.1  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Northern region

            

Burgos

   1,411.8     1,382.7     1,515.2     1,478.4     1,344.1     (9.1

Veracruz

   921.7     956.7     809.6     818.9     716.7     (12.5

Poza Rica-Altamira

   222.5     152.5     133.5     117.3     115.2     (1.8

Aceite Terciario del Golfo

        52.0     78.7     85.3     111.9     31.2  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   
   2,556.0     2,543.9     2,537.1     2,499.9     2,287.9     (8.5

Total

   2,537.1     2,499.9     2,287.8     2,139.3     2,060.6     (3.7
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total natural gas

   6,058.5     6,918.6     7,030.7     7,020.0     6,594.1     (6.1   7,030.7     7,020.0     6,594.1     6,384.7     6,370.3     (0.2
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)As of 2012, the Macuspana and Muspac business units were merged into the Macuspana-Muspac business unit.
(2)As of February 2010, the Burgos business unit includes the hydrocarbons production from the Nejo field.

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

In 2011,2013, the Marine regions produced 2,613.92,739.2 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, or 39.6%43.0% of our total natural gas production, an increase of 5.6% as compared to the regions’ 2012 production of 2,593.1 million cubic feet per day. In 2013, the Southern region produced 1,570.5 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, or 24.7% of our total natural gas production, a decrease of 5.1%5.0% as compared to the regions’ 2010region’s 2012 production of 2,755.41,652.4 million cubic feet per day. In 2011,2013, the SouthernNorthern region produced 1,692.32,060.6 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, or 25.7%32.3% of our total natural gas production, a decrease of 4.1%3.7% as compared to the region’s 20102012 production of 1,764.7 million cubic feet per day. In 2011, the Northern region produced 2,287.9 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, or 34.7% of our total natural gas production, a decrease of 8.5% as compared to the region’s 2010 production of 2,499.92,139.3 million cubic feet per day.

Pemex-Exploration and Production’s average natural gas production decreased by 0.2% in 2013, from 6,385 million cubic feet per day in 2012 to 6,370 million cubic feet per day in 2013. Natural gas production associated with crude oil production accounted for 72.3% of total natural gas production in 2013, with the remainder of natural gas production consisting of extraction from fields holding natural gas reserves. Although natural gas production is more geographically diverse than crude oil production, 182 fields (or 40.1% of the 454 producing fields) accounted for 27.7% of all natural gas production in 2013. Of total natural gas production, 43.0% originated in the Marine regions, 24.7% in the Southern region and the remainder, 32.3%, originated in the Northern region.

Investments in Exploration and Production

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for exploration and production were Ps. 177,059212,556 million in 2011,2013, as compared to Ps. 194,838193,801 million in 2010,2012, representing a 9.1% decrease9.7% increase in nominal terms. Of our total capital expenditures, Ps. 36,30329,738 million was directed to theKu-Maloob-Zaap fields, Ps. 28,171 million was directed to the Cantarell fields, Ps. 27,790 million was directed to the Strategic Gas Program, Ps. 21,91920,049 million was directed to the ATG project, Ps. 21,55413,312 million was directed to the Ku-Maloob-ZaapTsimin-Xux project, Ps. 11,489 million was directed to the Antonio J. Bermúdez fields, Ps. 19,56410,316 million was used for development of the Burgos natural gas fields (including Ps. 9,6063,042 million of investments made through the Financed Public Works Contracts Program, see “—Business Overview—Exploration and Production—Financed Public Works Contracts” in this Item 4), Ps. 11,21810,000 million was directed to the Antonio J. Bermúdez fields,Crudo Ligero Marino project, Ps. 6,5019,897 million was directed to the Chuc project, Ps. 6,693 million was directed to the Ogarrio-Magallanes project, Ps. 6,169 million was directed to the Delta del

Grijalva fields and Ps. 4,9124,208 million was directed to the Bellota-Chinchorro fields, Ps. 4,687 million was directed to the Integral Poza Rica fields, Ps. 3,800 million was directed to the Tamaulipas Constituciones project and Ps. 3,730 million was directed to the ChucCactus-Sitio Grande project. During 2011,2013, expenditures for these 11 projects amounted to 91.5%70.6% of all our capital expenditures for exploration and production. The remaining 8.5%29.4% amounted to Ps. 15,08262,514 million in nominal terms, which was directed to the 1219 remaining projects, as well as to other exploratory projects and administrative and technical support.

20122014 Exploration and Production Capital Expenditures Budget. For 2012,2014, Pemex-Exploration and Production has a total capital expenditures budget of Ps. 192,953230,879 million, as compared to Ps. 177,059212,556 million of capital expenditures made in 2011,2013, representing an increase of 9.0%8.6%. The 20122014 budget includes all of the 2326 ongoing strategic exploration and production projects and Ps. 4,85631,698 million in other exploratory projects. Approximately Ps. 159,298197,281 million, or 82.6%85.4% of our 20122014 capital expenditures budget, is to be allocated to projects relating to field development and pipelines. Approximately Ps. 33,65533,598 million, or 17.4%14.6% of the total budget, will be allocated to exploration activities.

The 20122014 exploration and production budget includes Ps. 48,24934,292 million for investments in the Ku-Maloob-Zaap project, Ps. 24,375 million for the Cantarell project, Ps. 34,81920,179 million for the Strategic Gas Program,Tsimin-Xux project, Ps. 22,80413,402 million for the Ku-Maloob-ZaapCrudo Ligero Marino project, Ps. 15,37812,245 million for the ATGChuc project, Ps. 13,31111,824 million for the Lakach project, Ps. 10,751 million for the Antonio J. Bermúdez project, Ps. 11,1289,935 million for the Burgos project, Ps. 8,2058,173 million for the ChucIntegral Yaxché project, Ps. 5,3266,934 million for the Delta del Grijalva project, Ps. 4,3425,242 million for the Integral Yaché project, Ps. 4,053 million for the Bellota-Chinchorro project, Ps. 3,779 million for the Jujo-TecominoacánATG project and Ps. 21,55973,527 million for the remaining projects, as well as for other exploratory and development projects and administrative and technical support.

Exploration and Production Investment Trends. In 2011,2013, we invested Ps. 31,13332,179 million in nominal terms, or 17.6%15.1% of the total capital expenditures of Pemex-Exploration and Production, in exploration activities, which represents a 5.6% increase3.0% decrease from the Ps. 29,47433,161 million invested in exploration activities in 2010.2012. In 2011,2013, we invested Ps. 145,926180,377 million in nominal terms, or 82.4%84.9% of the total capital expenditures for Pemex-Exploration and Production, in development activities, which represents an 11.8% decreasea 12.3% increase from the Ps. 165,364160,640 million invested in development activities in 2010.2012.

In 2012,2014, we have budgeted Ps. 33,65533,598 million, or 17.4%14.6% of total capital expenditures, for exploration activities of Pemex-Exploration and Production, which represents an 8.1%a 4.4% increase in nominal terms from the amount invested in exploration activities in 2011.2013. For development activities, we have budgeted Ps. 159,298197,281 million, or 82.6%85.4% of total capital expenditures, which represents a 9.2%9.4% increase in nominal terms from the amount that Pemex-Exploration and Production invested in development activities in 2011.2013. In 2013,2015, we expect to invest Ps. 39,79337,835 million, or 19.1% of total capital expenditures of Pemex-Exploration and Production, in exploration activities, which represents an 18.2% increase in nominal terms from the amount budgeted for 2012. In 2014, we expect to invest Ps. 41,114 million, or 23.7%16.5% of total capital expenditures of Pemex-Exploration and Production, in exploration activities, which represents a 3.3%12.6% increase in nominal terms from the amount budgeted for 2014. In 2016, we expect to invest Ps. 33,741 million, or 15.3% of total capital expenditures of Pemex-Exploration and Production, in exploration activities, which represents a 10.8% decrease in nominal terms from the amount projected for 2013.2015. In 2017, we expect to invest Ps. 28,578 million, or 14.1% of total capital expenditures of Pemex-Exploration and Production, in exploration activities, which represents a 15.3% decrease in nominal terms from the amount projected for 2016.

The capital expenditures of Pemex-Exploration and Production have constituted 83.9% or more than 84% of our total capital expenditures in each of the last five years. In 2012,2014, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s budgeted capital expenditures constitute 77.2%80.5% of our total.

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures related to exploration and development during the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Exploration and Development Capital Expenditures for 2007-20112009-2013

 

  Year ended December 31,(1)   Year ended December 31,(1) 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 
  (in millions of nominal pesos)   (in millions of nominal pesos) 

Exploration

   Ps.     13,624     Ps.    24,082     Ps.     30,372     Ps.     29,474     Ps.    31,133    Ps.30,372    Ps.29,474    Ps.31,133    Ps.33,161    Ps.32,179  

Development

   101,939     112,020     150,135     165,364     145,926     150,135     165,364     145,926     160,640     180,377  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   Ps.   115,563     Ps.  136,102     Ps.   180,507     Ps.   194,838     Ps.  177,059    Ps. 180,507    Ps. 194,838    Ps. 177,059    Ps. 193,801    Ps. 212,556  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Amounts based on cash basis method of accounting.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

The following table sets forth our estimated capital expenditures budget for exploration and development for 20122014 through 2015.2017.

Estimated Exploration and Development Capital Expenditures for 2012-20152014-2017

 

  Year ended December 31,(1)   Year ended December 31,(1) 
  2012(2)   2013   2014   2015   2014(2)   2015   2016   2017 
  (in millions of constant 2012 pesos)   (in millions of constant 2014 pesos) 

Exploration(3)

   Ps.     33,655     Ps.    39,793     Ps.     41,114     Ps.     28,406    Ps.33,598    Ps.37,835    Ps.33,741    Ps.28,578  

Development(3)

   159,298     168,782     132,071     101,546     197,281     192,147     186,333     174,536  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   Ps.   192,953     Ps.  208,575     Ps.   173,185     Ps.   129,952    Ps. 230,879    Ps. 229,982    Ps. 220,075    Ps. 203,114  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Amounts based on cash basis method of accounting.
(2)Approved budget.
(3)Estimated budgets for 20132015 through 20152017 are based on amounts authorized by the SHCP for projects in 2012.2014.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Investments and Production by Project

We conduct exploration, production and development activities in fields throughout Mexico. Our 11 main projects are Ku-Maloob-Zaap, Cantarell, the Strategic Gas Program, Aceite Terciario del Golfo, Ku-Maloob-Zaap, Burgos,ATG, Tsimin-Xux, Antonio J. Bermúdez, Burgos, Crudo Ligero Marino, Chuc, Ogarrio Magallanes, Delta del Grijalva Bellota-Chinchorro, Integral Poza Rica, Tamaulipas-Constituciones and Chuc.Cactus-Sitio Grande. These projects are described below.

Ku-Maloob-Zaap Project. The Ku-Maloob-Zaap project was our most important producer of heavy crude oil and plays an important part in the production of the Maya crude oil mix. It is the most important project in Mexico in terms of total proved hydrocarbon reserves and crude oil production. It is composed of the Bacab, Lum, Ku, Maloob and Zaap fields, and extends over an area of 149.5 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2013, there were a total of 217 wells completed, 177 of which were producing. The project produced an average of 863.8 thousand barrels of crude oil per day, 34.2% of our total production, and 405.1 million cubic feet of natural gas per day in

2013. As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production was 4.2 billion barrels of crude oil and 2.0 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2013, proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 3.3 billion barrels of crude oil and 1.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Total proved reserves were 3.6 billion barrels of oil equivalent, of which 2.7 billion barrels were developed.

In nominal peso terms, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s capital expenditures for this project were Ps. 21,554 million in 2011, Ps. 22,720 million in 2012 and Ps. 29,738 million in 2013. For 2014, we anticipate that capital expenditures will be Ps. 34,292 million and that total accumulated capital expenditures for this project will reach approximately U.S. $20.1 billion. In 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production paid approximately U.S. $36.2 million to acquire approximately 106.5 billion cubic feet of nitrogen for the pressure maintenance project in the fifth module of the Cantarell nitrogen cryogenic plant, which began operations in November 2006. In 2014, we expect to spend approximately U.S. $35.9 million to acquire approximately 108.6 billion cubic feet of nitrogen for injection into theKu-Maloob-Zaap fields.

Cantarell Project. The Cantarell project is located on the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. It consists of the Akal, Chac, Ixtoc, Kutz, Nohoch, Sihil and Takin fields, which extend over an area of 185.5 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2011,2013, there were a total of 514543 wells drilled in the Cantarell project, 198 of which were producing. During 2011,2013, the Cantarell business unit, of which the Cantarell project is part, was the second most important producer of crude oil in Mexico, averaging 500.7439.8 thousand barrels per day of crude oil. This was 10.3%3.1% less than 20102012 production, which was 558.0454.1 thousand barrels per day, as a result of the decline of these fields. Natural gas production from the Cantarell business unit during 20112013 averaged 1,074.71,007.1 million cubic feet per day. This was 14.2% less0.3% more than the 20102012 average natural gas production, which was 1,251.91,004.2 million cubic feet per day.day, due to the higher gas-to-oil ratio of the producing wells located close to the secondary gas-cap of the Cantarell reservoir.

The Cantarell project averaged 448.9379.6 thousand barrels per day of crude oil production during 2011.2013. This was 10.3%6.2% less than production in 2010,2012, which was 500.7404.5 thousand barrels per day. Natural gas production from the Cantarell project during 20112013 averaged 1,071.81,001.5 million cubic feet per day. This was 14.2% less0.01% more than the 20102012 average natural gas production, which was 1,248.71,001.4 million cubic feet per day.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, cumulative production of the Cantarell project was 13.714.0 billion barrels of crude oil and 7.38.0 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011,2013, proved hydrocarbon reserves of the Cantarell project totaled 1.91.8 billion barrels of crude oil and 1.31.2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011,2013, total proved reserves were 2.22.0 billion barrels of oil equivalent, 2.11.9 billion of which were developed.

The Akal field, which is the most important field in the Cantarell project, averaged 313.6203.3 thousand barrels per day of crude oil production during 2011.2013. This was 15.2%13.2% less than the average production in 2010,2012, which was 369.6234.1 thousand barrels per day.

In nominal peso terms, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s capital expenditures for the Cantarell project totaled Ps. 41,002 million in 2009, Ps. 38,437 million in 2010 and Ps. 36,303 million in 2011.2011, Ps. 42,139 million in 2012 and Ps. 28,171 million in 2013. For 2012,2014, we have budgeted Ps. 48,24924,375 million for capital expenditures for the Cantarell project. By the end of 2012,2014, we expect our capital expenditures to total approximately U.S. $36.7$40.1 billion for this project.

On October 10, 1997, we awarded a build-own-operate contract for a nitrogen cryogenic plant at the Cantarell project to a consortium formed by BOC Holdings, Linde, Marubeni, West Coast Energy and ICA Fluor Daniel. Under this contract, the consortium is responsible for the financing, design, construction and operation of the plant. The plant began operations in 2000 and cost approximately Ps. 10,131 million in nominal terms. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Pemex-Exploration and Production has the right to acquire the nitrogen plant in the case of a default by the consortium. Pemex-Exploration and Production has the obligation to acquire the nitrogen plant if it defaults under the contract. Under the terms of the contract, Pemex-Exploration and

Production has committed to purchase 1.2 billion cubic feet per day of nitrogen from the consortium for a period of 15 years. Because less pressure will be necessary as the Cantarell fields decline, the volume of nitrogen needed for injection into these fields will decrease over time. We therefore plan to direct an increasing amount of this nitrogen to the Ku-Maloob-Zaap project.

During 2011,2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production paid approximately U.S. $53.4$66.5 million under this contract for an approximate total volume of 348.8418.2 billion cubic feet of nitrogen, which was injected into the Cantarell fields. In 2012,2014, Pemex-Exploration and Production expects to pay approximately U.S. $61.6$66.2 million under this contract for an approximate total volume of 427.3426.4 billion cubic feet of nitrogen to be injected into the fields.

Strategic Gas Program (SGP). In 2001, Pemex-Exploration and Production began a nine-year, U.S. $8.1 billion Strategic Gas Program. Following the scheduled expiration of the SGP, Pemex-Exploration and Production decided to continue the SGP for as long as it continues to be profitable. Based on the expected acceleration of growth in the demand for natural gas in the medium- and long-term as compared to its projected supply, Pemex-Exploration and Production reviewed its energy policy. With the objective of addressing natural gas shortages, Pemex-Exploration and Production identified and selected a portfolio of investment options aimed at increasing gas production. Field development and production optimization represents 76% of SGP expenditures, with the goal of increasing the production of natural gas in the SGP to 2,308 million cubic feet per day by 2015. Exploration activities, which include twelve different exploratory natural gas and integral gas projects, represent 12% of SGP expenditures, with the goal of increasing proved reserves. Development of newly discovered fields represents 12% of SGP expenditures. The Veracruz project in the Northern region and the Crudo Ligero Marino and Ixtal-Manik projects in the Southwestern Marine regions are the SGP’s most important projects:

Veracruz Project. The Veracruz project is the second most important non-associated gas project in Mexico. It is located on the western margin of the Gulf of Mexico, in central Veracruz. During 2011, it produced an average of 716.7 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011, the

drilling of 319 wells had been completed and 267 of these wells were producing. As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production totaled 3.2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 0.74 trillion cubic feet of natural gas or 150.2 million barrels of oil equivalent. In addition, developed reserves totaled 0.67 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, or 133.1 million barrels of oil equivalent. Three of the most important fields in the Veracruz project are Lizamba, Papán and Cauchy.

Crudo Ligero Marino Project. This project is located on the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of the states of Tabasco and Campeche, 76 kilometers northeast from the Dos Bocas Marine Terminal in Paraíso, Tabasco. The project is composed of the Bolontikú, Citam, Ichalkil, Kab, Kix, May, Men, Misón, Nak, Sinán, Yum, Tsimin and the Xux fields, all in the Southwestern Marine region. As of December 31, 2011, the drilling of 78 wells had been completed, and 39 of these wells were producing. Approximately half of the fields in this project are not yet developed. During 2011, average daily production totaled 165.1 thousand barrels of crude oil and 533.2 million cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production totaled 373.3 million barrels of crude oil and 1,021.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 502.3 million barrels of crude oil and 2.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Total proved reserves were 1,005.3 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 323.3 million barrels were developed.

Ixtal-Manik Project. This project is located off the coast of the states of Tabasco and Campeche, 140 kilometers northeast from the Dos Bocas Marine Terminal in Paraíso, Tabasco, at a depth of between the 70- and 80-meter isobaths. The project is composed of the Ixtal and Manik fields, all in the Southwestern Marine region. Our investments in this project have been focused on the development of fields. As of December 31, 2011, the drilling of 15 wells had been completed, and 13 of these wells were producing. During 2011, average daily production totaled 110.8 thousand barrels of crude oil and 219.6 million cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production totaled 212.3 million barrels of crude oil and 409.1 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 128.4 million barrels of crude oil and 0.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Total proved reserves were 176.4 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 146.3 million barrels were developed.

In nominal peso terms, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s capital expenditures for the SGP were Ps. 28,626 in 2009, Ps. 27,944 million in 2010 and Ps. 27,790 million in 2011. For 2012, we have budgeted Ps. 34,819 million for capital expenditures for the SGP, which would bring our total capital expenditures for the program to approximately U.S. $22.4 billion through December 31, 2012.

From 2007 to 2011, average production from the SGP was 1.9 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. During 2011, 2 fields were discovered in the Veracruz basin through the drilling of two wells, which added 52.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas and 3.4 million barrels of oil to proved reserves. Development activities have focused mainly on the Veracruz, Crudo Ligero Marino and Ixtal-Manik projects. For the Veracruz project, 3.6 million barrels of oil equivalent were added from the drilling of ten wells at the Arquimia and Cauchy fields during 2011. Similar development activities were performed in the Crudo Ligero Marino project, where 63.2 million barrels of oil equivalent were added from the drilling of three wells. Finally, the Ixtal-Manik project increased its proved reserves by 8.8 million barrels of oil equivalent through the completion of two producing wells.

Aceite Terciario del Golfo Project (formerly Paleocanal de Chicontepec). The Aceite Terciario del GolfoATG project is located in the Northern region and covers an area of 4,243 square kilometers.Thiskilometers. This project is comprised of 29 fields, which are divided among eight sectors. As of December 31, 2011,2013, there were a total of 3,6324,427 wells completed, of which 2,0022,790 were producing. The project produced an average of 52.9 thousand barrels per day of crude oil as compared to 41.066.2 thousand barrels per day of crude oil in 2010,2013 as compared to 68.6 thousand barrels per day of crude oil in 2012, which represented a 29% increase,3.5% decrease, and 111.8167.0 million cubic feet of natural gas per day in 20112013 as compared to 85.3148.8 million cubic feet of natural gas per day in 2010,2012, which represented a 31%12.2% increase. The decrease in crude oil production was primarily due to the decline in pressure in certain reservoirs, whereas the increase in natural gas production was primarily due to the use of unconventional wells and artificial lift systems. As of December 31, 2011,2013, cumulative production was 204.9was254.1 million barrels of crude oil and 369.8485.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011,2013, proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 568.3606.7 million barrels of crude oil and 880.8948.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Total

proved reserves were 743.0806.3 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 191.4260.6 million were developed. During 2011,2013, field development activities at the project included the drilling of 465102 wells, and the completion of 513205 wells. Of these 513All 205 completed wells 490 were classified as producing, reflecting a success factor of 95.5%100%. As of December 31, 2011, 67%2013, 72% of the total producing wells were operating with artificial lift systems, such as beam pumps and gas lifts, while the remaining 33%28% were “flowing wells” that are classified as suchaccordingly because they did not require any means of artificial lift.

In nominal peso terms, Pemex-Exploration and Production’sour capital expenditures for the Aceite Terciario del GolfoATG project were Ps. 20,60721,919 in 2009,2011, Ps. 28,26220,864 million in 20102012 and Ps. 21,91920,049 million in 2011.2013. For 2012,2014, we anticipate that capital expenditures for this project will be Ps. 15,3785,242 million and that total accumulated investments in this project will be approximately U.S. $8.8$11.7 billion.

Ku-Maloob-ZaapTsimin-Xux Project. The Ku-Maloob-ZaapThis project was our most important producerconsists of heavy crudethe Tsimin and Xux fields, which include volatile oil and plays an important partgas condensate reservoirs in the productionshallow waters of the Maya crude oil mix. ItGulf of Mexico. The Tsimin field is located 62 kilometers from the most important projectDos Bocas Marine Terminal in Mexico in terms of total proved hydrocarbon reserves and crude oil production. ItParaíso, Tabasco, while the Xux field is composedlocated on the continental shelf of the Bacab, Lum, Ku, MaloobGulf of Mexico, approximately ten kilometers off the coast of Tabasco. This project is geographically bounded by a 500-meter isobath to the north and Zaap fields,the coast of Tabasco. During 2013, four new wells were completed at the Tsimin field and extends over an area of 149.5 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2011, there were a total of 197 wellsone new well was completed 146 of which were producing. Theat the Xux field. During 2013, average daily production at the Tsimin-Xux project produced an average of 842.0totaled 40.0 thousand barrels of crude oil 33% of our total production, and 330.9160.0 million cubic feet of natural gasgas. The development plan for this project estimates that average daily production will peak at 144 thousand barrels of crude oil and 663 million cubic feet of natural gas. During 2013, the sales prices of the light and extra-light crude oil produced at this field averaged more than U.S. $90.00 per daybarrel, making this one of our most important projects in 2011. terms of revenue generation.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, cumulative production was 3.6totaled 12.1 billion barrels of crude oil and 1.753.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, provedProved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 3.3 billion278.2 million barrels of crude oil and 1.51.6 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Total proved reserves were 3.6 billion610.6 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 2.6 billion186.0 million barrels were developed.

In nominal peso terms, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s capital expenditures for this project were Ps. 20,894 million in 2009, Ps. 18,350 million in 2010 and Ps. 21,554 million in 2011. For 2012, we anticipate that capital expenditures will be Ps. 22,804 million and that total accumulated capital expenditures for this project will reach approximately U.S. $15.9 billion. In 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production paid approximately U.S. $71.4 million to acquire approximately 88.8 billion cubic feet of nitrogen for the pressure maintenance project in the fifth module of the Cantarell nitrogen cryogenic plant, which began operations in November 2006. In 2012, we expect to spend approximately U.S. $81.6 million to acquire approximately 108.8 billion cubic feet of nitrogen for injection into the Ku-Maloob-Zaap fields.

Burgos Project. The Burgos project is the largest producer of non-associated gas in Mexico. In 1997, Pemex-Exploration and Production initiated a development program for the Burgos natural gas fields. The purpose of the Burgos project is to enable us to meet increasing domestic demand for natural gas. The fields in Burgos accounted for 20.4% of our total natural gas production in 2011. The project is located in northeastern Mexico.

During 2011, the Burgos project produced an average of 1.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011, a total of 7,425 wells had been completed, including wells completed prior to 1997. Between 1997 and 2011, a total of 4,047 wells had been completed, 2,813 of which were producing. The most important fields are the Arcabuz-Culebra, Cuitláhuac, Cuervito, Arcos, Santa Anita, Nejo and Palmito fields, which together produced 39.2% of the total production of the Burgos project in 2011.

Main Fields of the Burgos Project

(as of December 31, 2011)

  Arcabuz-
Culebra
  Cuitláhuac  Cuervito  Arcos  Santa Anita  Nejo  Palmito 

Total acreage (square kilometers)

  386    211    45    46    46    103    54  

Developed acreage

  359    197    30    46    35    80    54  

Undeveloped acreage

  27    14    15    0    11    23    0  

Wells completed

  938    409    115    195    64    159    118  

Producing wells

  597    189    77    123    48    129    76  

2011 production of natural gas (million cubic feet per day)

  154.5    87.4    43.5    24.1    36.9    141.1    38.6  

Cumulative production of natural gas (billion cubic feet)

  1,816.4    639.5    120.1    632.9    190.0    149.2    56.4  

Proved reserves of natural gas (billion cubic feet)

  186.8    114.4    136.4    43.0    65.7    144.3    52.8  

Proved developed reserves

  139.2    84.0    80.9    41.8    48.2    87.8    51.6  

Proved undeveloped reserves

  47.6    30.5    55.5    1.2    17.5    56.5    1.2  

From 2007 to 2011, exploration activities and the reclassification of reserves increased estimated proved reserves in Burgos by 445.5 million barrels of oil equivalent. Production during this period totaled 529.0 million barrels of oil equivalent. During 2011, proved reserves decreased by 15.8 million barrels of oil equivalent, from 403.8 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2010 to 388.0 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2011.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures (including capital expenditures made pursuant to Financed Public Works Contracts) for the BurgosTsimin-Xux project were Ps. 19,41013,312 million in 2009, Ps. 29,704 million in 2010 and Ps. 19,564 million in 2011. For 2012,2013. In 2014, we anticipate that ourexpect capital expenditures for this project will amount to total Ps. 11,128 million and that our total accumulated capital expenditures will reach approximately U.S. $17.3 billion.20,179 million.

Antonio J. Bermúdez Project. In 2002, we began investing in the Antonio J. Bermúdez project, the main investment project in the Southern region and the sixthfifth largest in Mexico. This project is designed to accelerate reserves recovery, as well as increase the recovery factor by drilling additional wells and implementing a system of pressure maintenance through nitrogen injection. It consists of the Samaria, Cunduacán, Oxiacaque, Iride and Platanal fields, and covers an area of 163 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2011,2013, a total of 446789 wells had been completed, of which 166244 were producing. During 2011,2013, the project produced an average of 67.567.3 thousand barrels per day of crude oil and 234.2223.8 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011,2013, cumulative production was 2.82.9 billion barrels of crude oil and 4.24.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011,2013, proved hydrocarbon reserves in this field totaled 0.8 billion barrels of crude oil and 2.12.0 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011,2013, total proved reserves were 1.41.3 billion barrels of oil equivalent, of which 0.70.6 billion were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Antonio J. Bermúdez project were Ps. 10,442 million in 2009, Ps. 9,853 million in 2010 and Ps. 11,218 million in 2011.2011, Ps. 13,126 million in 2012 and Ps. 11,489 million in 2013. For 2012,2014, we anticipate that our capital

expenditures for this project will be Ps. 13,31110,751 million and that our total accumulated investments in the project will reach approximately U.S. $7.0$8.5 billion. In March 2005, we entered into a contract with Praxair México, S. de R.L. de C.V. to build, own and operate a nitrogen cryogenic plant. Construction of this plant was completed in June 2008. After completing testing in July 2008, we began injecting 190 million cubic feet per day of nitrogen into the project. In 2011,2013, we paid approximately Ps. 62068.3 million to acquire nitrogen from this plant that enabled us to inject approximately 152187.1 million cubic feet per day during 20112013 for pressure maintenance in connection with the project. From 20122014 to 2022, we plan to continue to inject thisthe same volume of nitrogen.

Delta del GrijalvaBurgos Project. The Delta del GrijalvaBurgos project is the most importantlargest producer of non-associated gas in the Southern region in terms of both oil and gas production. The project covers an area of 1,343 square kilometers and has been exploited byMexico. In 1997, Pemex-Exploration and Production since 1982. Asinitiated a development program for the Burgos natural gas fields. The purpose of December 31, 2011, there were athe Burgos project is to enable us to meet increasing domestic demand for natural gas. The fields inBurgos accounted for 20.2% of our total of 162 wells drilled, of which 60 were producing. natural gas production in 2013. The project is located in northeastern Mexico.

During 2011,2013, the Burgos project produced an average of 155.1 thousand barrels of crude oil and 481.5 million1.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2013, the drilling of 7,762 wells had been completed, 3,170 of which were producing. The most important fields are Sen, Caparroso-Pijije-Escuintlethe Arcabuz-Culebra, Cuitláhuac, Cuervito, Topo, Santa Anita, Nejo and Tizón.Palmito fields, which together produced 43.6% of the total production of the Burgos project in 2013.

Main Fields of the Burgos Project

(as of December 31, 2013)

 

Sen. This field covers an area of 45.1 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2011, a total of 46 wells had been completed, 20 of which were producing. During 2011, the field produced an average of 57.6 thousand barrels of crude oil and 147.2 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production was 274.4 million barrels of crude oil and 753.6 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 97.9 million barrels of crude oil and 259.1 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, total proved reserves were 158.9 million barrels of oil equivalent, 144.2 million of which were developed.
   Arcabuz-
Culebra
   Cuitláhuac   Cuervito   Topo   Santa
Anita
   Nejo   Palmito 

Total acreage (square kilometers)

   380     221     50     41     53     164     64  

Developed acreage

   361     208     33     32     40     157     60  

Undeveloped acreage

   19     13     17     9     13     7     4  

Wells completed

   943     431     128     71     73     312     134  

Producing wells

   603     209     89     37     56     235     88  

2013 production of natural gas (million cubic feet per day)

   130.4     92.8     48.9     33.8     37.5     180.6     37.0  

Cumulative production of natural gas (billion cubic feet)

   1,914.7     705.3     155.5     121.1     216.2     269.1     85.4  

Proved reserves of natural gas (billion cubic feet)

   117.0     137.2     163.2     41.6     66.3     99.7     55.0  

Proved developed reserves

   86.2     83.6     74.0     25.0     40.1     92.9     45.7  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   30.8     53.6     89.2     16.6     26.2     6.8     9.3  

From 2009 to 2013, exploration activities and the reclassification of reserves increased estimated proved reserves in Burgos by 465.2 million barrels of oil equivalent. Production during this period totaled 510.6 million barrels of oil equivalent. During 2013, proved reserves decreased by 36.4 million barrels of oil equivalent, from 382.2 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2012 to 345.8 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2013.

Caparroso-Pijije-Escuintle. This field covers an area of 28.2 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2011, a total of 47 wells had been completed, 21 of which were producing. During 2011, the field produced an average of 63.6 thousand barrels of crude oil and 161.8 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production was 190.5 million barrels of crude oil and 535.9 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 103.9 million barrels of crude oil and 275.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, total proved reserves were 168.7 million barrels of oil equivalent, 152.0 million of which were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures (including capital expenditures made pursuant to Financed Public Works Contracts, or FPWC) for the Burgos project were Ps. 19,564 million in 2011, Ps. 17,324 million in 2012 and Ps. 10,316 million in 2013. For 2014, we anticipate that our capital expenditures for this project will amount to Ps. 9,935 million and that our total accumulated capital expenditures will reach approximately U.S. $19.3 billion.

Tizón. This field covers an area of 17.8 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2011, a total of 12 wells had been completed, seven of which were producing. During 2011, the field produced an average of 11.9 thousand barrels of crude oil and 67.9 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production was 29.8 million barrels of crude oil and 179.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 12.0 million barrels of crude oil and 66.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, total proved reserves were 27.8 million barrels of oil equivalent, all of which were developed.

Crudo Ligero Marino Project. In 2013, the SHCP approved designating the Crudo Ligero Marino project as a stand-alone project, thereby separating it from the Strategic Gas Program of which it formed part from 2001 through 2012. In 2013, the Och-Uech-Kax project was integrated into this project. The main objectives for the Crudo Ligero Marino project during the years 2013 to 2037 are to continue constructing seven ships, implement secondary recovery techniques at the May and Bolontiku fields and carry out optimization and maintenance activities at its facilities. As of December 31, 2011,2013, a total of 89 wells had been completed at this project, of which 56 were producing. During 2013, average daily production totaled 159.0 thousand barrels of crude oil and 546.8 million cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production in the Delta del Grijalva project was 0.60.8 billion barrels of crude oil and 2.32.0 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves as of December 31, 2011 totaled 257.5259.9 million barrels of crude oil and 783.5 billion0.9 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, totalTotal proved reserves were 442.1428.8 million barrels of oil equivalent, 390.7of which 300.5 million of whichbarrels were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Delta del GrijalvaCrudo Ligero Marino project weretotaled Ps. 4,57110,000 million in 2009, Ps. 5,904 million in 2010 and Ps. 6,501 million in 2011. In 2012,2013. For 2014, we expectanticipate our capital expenditures to betotal Ps. 5,326 million, bringing our total capital expenditures for the project to approximately U.S. $2.4 billion.13,402 million.

Bellota-Chinchorro Project. The Bellota-Chinchorro project is the fourth most important crude oil producer in the Southern region. This project covers an area of 111 square kilometers and has been exploited by Pemex-Exploration and Production since 1981. In addition to the Bellota and Chinchorro fields, the fields in the project include Chipilín, Cobra, Cupache and Edén-Jolote. Since 2004, our investments in the Bellota-Chinchorro fields have been focused on field development. As of December 31, 2011, a total of 127 wells had been completed, of which 25 were producing. During 2011, the project produced an average of 66.8 thousand barrels of crude oil and 110.5 million cubic feet of natural gas per day.

As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production was 677.8 million barrels of crude oil and 1,093.9 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 243.1 million barrels of crude oil and 531.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011, total proved reserves were 375.2 million barrels of oil equivalent, 236.2 million of which were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Bellota-Chinchorro project were Ps. 4,496 million in 2009, Ps. 5,518 million in 2010 and Ps. 4,912 million in 2011. In 2012, we expect our capital expenditures to be Ps. 4,053 million, bringing our total capital expenditures for the project to approximately U.S. $2.6 billion.

Integral Poza Rica Project. The Integral Poza Rica project is the second-largest crude oil producer in the Northern region. This project covers an area of 649 square kilometers. Since 2002, our investments in this project have been focused on accelerating the development of mature oil and gas fields located at the Poza Rica, San Andrés and Faja de Oro Terrestre areas, as well as the development of the fields corresponding to the Tres Hermanos Project, through the use of artificial lift systems, secondary recovery techniques, and 3-D seismic acquisition. A total of 141 wells were completed between 2002 and 2011, and as of December 31, 2011, a total of 769 wells were producing. During 2011, the project produced an average of 28.5 thousand barrels of crude oil and 33.6 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. In addition, as of December 31, 2011, cumulative production was 3,772.4 million barrels of crude oil and 3,733.4 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 79.0 million barrels of crude oil and 80.0 billion cubic feet of natural gas as of the same date. As of December 31, 2011, total proved reserves were 86.3 million barrels of oil equivalent, 78.8 million of which were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Integral Poza Rica project were Ps. 2,122 million in 2009, Ps. 2,936 million in 2010 and Ps. 4,687 million in 2011. In 2012, we expect our capital expenditures to be Ps. 2,921 million, bringing our total capital expenditures for the project to approximately U.S. $1.2 billion.

Tamaulipas-Constituciones Project. The Tamaulipas-Constituciones project is the third-largest producer in the Northern region. This project covers an area of 850 square kilometers. This project is mainly composed of the Tamaulipas-Constituciones, Ébano, Pánuco, Cacalilao, Barcodón and Limón fields. Since 2001, our investments in this project have been focused on field development, as well as exploiting the production potential and reserves from the Ébano-Pánuco-Cacalilao area, based on testing and recovery technology, such as 3-D seismic acquisition, the drilling of development wells, infill drilling, and the waterflooding system at the Tamaulipas-Constituciones area. A total of 233 wells were completed between 2001 and 2011, and as of December 31, 2011, a total of 763 wells were producing. During 2011, the project produced an average of 16.3 thousand barrels of crude oil and 17.1 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011, cumulative production was 1,302.5 million barrels of crude oil and 2,919.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 82.6 million barrels of crude oil and 47.6 billion cubic feet of natural gas as of the same date. As of December 31, 2011, total proved reserves were 90.2 million barrels of oil equivalent, 50.7 million of which were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Tamaulipas-Constituciones project were Ps. 987 million in 2009, Ps. 1,967 million in 2010 and Ps. 3,800 million in 2011. In 2012, we expect our capital expenditures for this project to be Ps. 1,516 million, and anticipate that our total accumulated capital expenditures for the project will reach approximately U.S. $0.7 billion.

Chuc Project. The Chuc project is the third-largest producer of light crude oil in the Southwestern Marine region, and includes the operation and maintenance of the Pol-A facility and water injection complexes. In 2013, the SHCP approved the integration of the Caan project into the Chuc project. This project covers an area of 213 square kilometers and has been exploited by Pemex-Exploration and Production since 1981. The fields of this project are located on the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico, off the coast of the states of Tabasco and Campeche, at a depth of between the 20- and 100-meter isobaths, approximately 132 kilometers from the Dos Bocas Marine Terminal in Paraíso, Tabasco, and 79 kilometers northeast of Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche. The fields in the project include Batab, Ché, Chuc, Chuhuk, Etkal, Homol, Kuil, Onel, Pokoch, Pol, Tumut, Uchak and Wayil. In January 2007, the Pol and Batab projects were merged into the Chuc

project. As of December 31, 2011, 892013, 99 wells had been completed, of which 3680 were producing. During 2011,2013, average production totaled 100.1220.9 thousand barrels per day of crude oil and 137.1410.7 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2011,2013, cumulative production totaled 1.95.5 billion barrels of crude oil and 2.06.2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2011,2013, proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 209.2422.5 million barrels of oil and 389.5818.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas, or a total of 281.8573.1 million barrels of oil equivalent. As of December 31, 2011,2013, total proved developed reserves were 122.1411.8 million barrels of oil equivalent.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Chuc project were Ps. 3,469 million in 2009, Ps. 2,619 million in 2010 and Ps. 3,730 million in 2011.2011, Ps. 7,870 million in 2012 and Ps. 9,897 million in 2013. In 2012,2014, we expect our capital expenditures for the Chuc project to be Ps. 8,20512,245 million and anticipate that our total accumulated capital expenditures for thethis project will reach approximately U.S. $2.8$4.4 billion.

Ogarrio-Magallanes Project. The Ogarrio-Magallanes project is composed of 20 crude oil and natural gas producing fields and forms part of the Cinco Presidentes business unit. This project is located between the state borders of Veracruz and Tabasco and covers an area of 10,820 square kilometers. From a geological standpoint, this project pertains to the Isthmus Saline basin, specifically the southeastern basins at the Tertiary level. The Ogarrio-Magallanes project is geographically bounded by the Gulf of Mexico to the north, the geological folds of

the Sierra Madre of Chiapas to the south, the Tertiary basin of Veracruz to the west and the Comalcalco Tertiary basin to the east. The primary objective of this project is to increase production levels through the drilling of development wells and infill wells, which are drilled between producing wells to more efficiently recover hydrocarbon reserves, the execution of workovers of wells and the implementation of secondary and enhanced oil recovery processes. In addition, we aim to optimize the infrastructure of this project in order to counteract the decreases in production levels that result from the natural depletion of its reservoirs.

As of December 31, 2013, the Ogarrio-Magallanes project had 582 producing wells and 117 new wells had been completed during 2013. Average daily production totaled 93.1 thousand barrels of crude oil and 129.4 million cubic feet of natural gas during 2013. As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production was 1.9 billion barrels of crude oil and 2.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 193.7 million barrels of crude oil and 305.6 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Total proved reserves were 259.1 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 216.0 million barrels were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Ogarrio-Magallanes project were Ps. 6,693 million in 2013. For 2014, we anticipate that our capital expenditures will total Ps. 5,229 million.

Delta del Grijalva Project. The Delta del Grijalva project is the most important project in the Southern region in terms of both oil and gas production. The project covers an area of 1,343 square kilometers and has been exploited by Pemex-Exploration and Production since 1982. As of December 31, 2013, there were a total of 175 wells drilled, of which 54 were producing. During 2013, the project produced an average of 105.2 thousand barrels per day of crude oil and 382.5 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. The most important fields are Sen, Caparroso-Pijije-Escuintle and Tizón.

Sen. This field covers an area of 45.1 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2013, a total of 48 wells had been completed, 17 of which were producing. During 2013, the field produced an average of 29.0 thousand barrels per day of crude oil and 67.8 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production was 303.5 million barrels of crude oil and 827.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 51.4 million barrels of crude oil and 140.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2013, total proved reserves were 85.6 million barrels of oil equivalent, 58.7 million of which were developed.

Caparroso-Pijije-Escuintle.This field covers an area of 28.2 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2013, a total of 50 wells had been completed, 15 of which were producing. During 2013, the field produced an average of 26.8 thousand barrels per day of crude oil and 74.4 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production was 216.9 million barrels of crude oil and 607.9 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 54.8 million barrels of crude oil and 162.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2013, total proved reserves were 94.3 million barrels of oil equivalent, 69.3 million of which were developed.

Tizón.This field covers an area of 17.8 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2013, a total of 13 wells had been completed, nine of which were producing. During 2013, the field produced an average of 26.6 thousand barrels per day of crude oil and 141.1 million cubic feet of natural gas perday. As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production was 46.3 million barrels of crude oil and 264.1 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 21.4 million barrels of crude oil and 121.0 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2013, total proved reserves were 50.8 million barrels of oil equivalent, 39.7 million of which were developed.

As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production in the Delta del Grijalva project was 0.7 billion barrels of crude oil and 2.6 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves as of December 31, 2013 totaled 184.1 million barrels of crude oil and 662.4 billion cubic feet of natural gas. As of December 31, 2013, total proved reserves were 344.9 million barrels of oil equivalent, 241.4 million of which were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Delta del Grijalva project were Ps. 6,501 million in 2011, Ps. 5,671 million in 2012 and Ps. 6,169 million in 2013. In 2014, we expect our capital expenditures to be Ps. 6,934 million, bringing our total capital expenditures for the project to approximately U.S. $3.3 billion.

Cactus-Sitio Grande Project. The Cactus-Sitio Grande project forms part of the Macuspana-Muspac business unit and is located in the northern region of the state of Chiapas, 32 kilometers southwest of Villahermosa in the state of Tabasco. This project covers an area of 33,747 square kilometers and is geographically bounded by the coastal plain of the Gulf of Mexico to the north and the Sierra Madre of Chiapas to the south, east and west. The primary objective for this project is to increase production levels through the development of the Teotleco, Juspí, Artesa, Gaucho and Chintul fields, in part through the drilling of new high-angle wells and the recovery of the remaining hydrocarbon reserves. To this end, we additionally plan to carry out major workovers of producing wells to extend their productive lifespans, strengthen and stabilize production levels by means of cleaning and stimulation services based on the nature of the natural gas liquids produced and reopen wells that have been out of operation.

As of December 31, 2013, there were 133 producing wells at the Cactus-Sitio Grande project and 18 new wells had been completed during 2013. Average daily production totaled 52.4 thousand barrels of crude oil and 275.9 million cubic feet of natural gas during 2013. As of December 31, 2013, cumulative production in the Cactus-Sitio Grande project was 1.8 billion barrels of crude oil and 9.7 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Proved hydrocarbon reserves totaled 93.1 million barrels of crude oil and 707.1 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Total proved reserves were 257.8 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 227.9 million barrels were developed.

In nominal peso terms, our capital expenditures for the Cactus-Sitio Grande project were Ps. 4,208 million in 2013. For 2014, we anticipate capital expenditures to total Ps. 3,526 million.

Crude Oil Sales

During 2011,2013, domestic consumption of crude oil amounted to approximately 1,172.31,229.1 thousand barrels per day, which represented 47%48.7% of our total crude oil production. Through PMI’s activities, we sold the remainder of our crude oil production abroad. See “—Business Overview—International Trading” in this Item 4. Maya crude oil accounted for 76%81.4% of exported crude oil volume sold by PMI in 2011.2013. See “—Business Overview—International Trading” in this Item 4.

The following table sets forth crude oil distribution for the past five years.

Crude Oil Distribution

 

  At December 31,   2011
vs. 2010
   At December 31,   2013
vs. 2012
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
  (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%)   (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%) 

Production

   3,075.7     2,791.6     2,601.5     2,575.9     2,550.1     (1.0   2,601.5     2,577.0     2,552.6     2,547.9     2,522.1     (1.0

Distribution

                        

Refineries

   1,230.9     1,216.2     1,264.4     1,190.7     1,172.3     (1.5   1,264.4     1,190.7     1,172.3     1,211.0     1,229.1     1.5  

Petrochemicals(1)

   125.5     131.1     97.4     0.0     0.0       

Petrochemicals(1)

   97.4     0.0     0.0     0.0     0.0       

Export terminals

   1,701.3     1,406.9     1,231.7     1,358.0     1,342.9     (1.1   1,231.7     1,358.0     1,342.9     1,268.3     1,190.4     (6.1
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   3,057.8     2,754.2     2,593.5     2,548.7     2,515.2     (1.3   2,593.5     2,548.7     2,515.2     2,479.3     2,419.5     (2.4
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Statistical differences in stock measurements(2)

   17.9     37.4     8.0     27.2     34.9     28.3     8.0     28.3     37.4     68.6     102.6     49.6  

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)There was no crude oil distributed to Pemex-Petrochemicals for the production of refined products in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2011.2013.
(2)Includes measurement inconsistencies, shrinkage and leakage.leakage, naphthas and condensates added to crude oil.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Maya crude oil accounted for 40% of domestic consumption in 2011. Due to its high sulfur content, Maya crude oil requires extra processing and has lower refining yields than most valuable sweet crudes, and thus requires extra investment by the purchaser to refine. Therefore, we receive a lower price for Maya crude oil than we do for sweeter crude oils that cost less to refine. As a consequence of this price difference, we have supported the export value of sour crude oil such as Maya crude oil in relation to other grades of crude oil by creating incentives for refiners to invest in high-conversion refineries capable of upgrading the relatively large proportion of residue produced from processing sour crude oil. We have done this by entering into long-term Maya crude oil supply agreements pursuant to which purchasers have agreed to undertake projects to expand the capacity of their respective refineries to upgrade residue from Maya crude oil, and we have provided, for a limited period, support mechanisms to protect refinery margins in certain adverse market conditions. See “—Business Overview—International Trading—Geographic Distribution of Export Sales” in this Item 4.

Gas Flaring

The flaring of produced gas, which consists of the burning off of surplus combustible vapors from a well, usually occurs as a result of operational adjustments to carry out maintenance at production facilities, and in some cases is due to limitations in the ability to handle, process or transport natural gas. In addition, the flaring of produced gas is also used as a safety measure to relieve well pressure. Gas flaring is considered to be one of the most significant sources of air emissions from offshore oil and gas installations. In 2011,2013, gas flaring represented 5.3%1.9% of total natural gas production, which represents a declinedecrease from 2010,2012, when gas flaring represented 8.5%2.0% of total natural gas production. This decrease reflects a lower frequency of operational problems and the resulting decreased need for maintenance of platforms equipment. Pemex-Exploration and Production’s goal is to reduce gas flaring to 3.5%1.3% of total natural gas production by the end of 2012.2014. To achieve this goal, we are implementingwill continue to implement programs to reduce gas flaring in all of our business units and we are building additional infrastructure to improve gas extraction efficiency, and use.including strategies to optimize the exploitation of wells with high associated gas content at the Cantarell project.

Pipelines

The crude oil and natural gas pipeline network owned by Pemex-Exploration and Production connects crude oil and natural gas producing centers with refineries and petrochemical plants. At the end of 2011,2013, this pipeline network consisted of approximately 39,40740,240 kilometers of pipelines, of which 3,4903,581 kilometers were located in the Marine region, 11,56611,235 kilometers were located in the Southern region and 24,35125,424 kilometers were located in the Northern region. For a description of products transported by the pipeline network, see “—Business Overview—Transportation and Distribution” in this Item 4.

Financed Public Works Contracts

Our Financed Public Works ContractsFPWC program, or FPWC, previously known as the Multiple Services Contracts program, was first announced in December 2001. The objective of the program is to provide a contractual framework that promotes an efficient execution of public works, in order to increase Mexico’s hydrocarbons production. The FPWC are public works contracts based on unit prices that aggregate a number of different services into a single contract. Under the FPWC framework, Pemex-Exploration and Production retains the rights and title to all hydrocarbons produced and works performed under each FPWC.

The following table summarizes Pemex-Exploration and Production’s existing FPWCs as of December 31, 2011.2013.

 

Block

 

Contractor

 Contract Amount
(in millions of
U.S.
dollars)
 

Reynosa-Monterrey

 Repsol Exploración México, S.A. de C.V. U.S. $2,437.2  

Cuervito

 PTD Servicios Múltiples, S. de R.L. de C.V.  260.1  

Misión

 Servicios Múltiples de Burgos, S.A. de C.V.  1,529.2  

Fronterizo

 PTD Servicios Múltiples, S. de R.L. de C.V.  265.0  

Olmos

 Lewis Energy México, S. de R.L. de C.V.  343.6  

Pirineo

 Monclova Pirineo Gas, S.A. de C.V.  645.3  

Nejo

Iberoamericana de Hidrocarburos, S.A. de C.V.1,916.2

Monclova(1)

 GPA Energy, S.A. de C.V.  1,070.0  

Total

U.S. $6,550.4
  

 

 

 

Total

U.S.  $8,466.6

��

 

(1)On December 14, 2011, the amount of the contract corresponding to the Monclova block was increased by U.S. $636.5 million, for a new overall amount of U.S. $1,070.0 million.

Source: Pemex-Exploration and Production.

On March 1, 2013, the contract governing the Nejo block, which was previously an FPWC, was modified to adopt a structure similar to that of our Integrated E&P Contracts. As a result, the contract was removed from the

During 2011, among other works performed under the FPWC program 80as of the date of its modification. The contractor Iberoamericana de Hidrocarburos, S.A. de C.V. has committed to invest approximately U.S. $400 million to develop the Nejo block under this new scheme.

Among other FPWC works during 2013, 17 wells were drilled in the Burgos project under the FPWC program, which represents approximately 40%13% of all wells drilled in Burgos. Also in 2011, 742013, 37 wells were completed, consisting of 6833 development wells and 6four exploratory wells. All but 3six of these completed wells were productive. The works carried out in 20112013 represented an investment of approximately U.S. $745$234 million. By the end of 2011,2013, natural gas production in the existing FPWC blocks reached 415233 million cubic feet per day, which represents approximately 31%20% of all natural gas production from Burgos during 2011.2013.

On January 8, 2014, the contract corresponding to the Reynosa-Monterrey block expired and Pemex-Exploration and Production became solely responsible for the activities carried out in connection with this block.

Integrated Exploration and Production Contracts

Our Integrated Exploration and Production Contracts (which we refer to as the Integrated E&P Contracts)Contracts program is based on the various laws and amendments enacted as part of the 2008 reforms.Energy Reform. See “—History and Development” in this Item 4. The objective of these Integrated E&P Contracts is to increase PEMEX’sour execution capabilities, Mexico’s reserves and PEMEX’sas well as our production. The hydrocarbons reserves located in and extracted from the contractual areas will continue to be exclusively owned by Mexico. Payments to the contractors pursuant to the Integrated E&P Contracts will be made on a per-barrel basis, plus recovery costs, provided that the payments to the contractor may not exceed PEMEX’sour cash flow from the particular block subject to each contract.block.

On March 1, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production publishedawarded its invitation for bids for the first threeround of Integrated E&P Contracts, relating to the Santuario, Carrizo and Magallanes blocks, which are located in mature fields in the Southern Regionregion in Mexico, in August 2011. In July and August of Mexico. On August 18, 2011, PEMEX awarded the contracts for Santuario and Magallanes blocks to Petrofac, a British energy services firm, and the contract for the Carrizo block toAdministradora en Proyectos de Campos(APC), a Mexican firm. However, after APC failed to comply with the legal requirements for entering into the contract, and in accordance to the bidding rules, the contract for the Carrizo block was awarded to Dowell Schlumberger de México, S.A. on October 25, 2011. The contracts for the Santuario and Magallanes blocks were signed on October 17, 2011, while the contract for Carrizo was signed on December 14, 2011. Each contract has a term of up to 25 years.

On January 19, 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production published the call for bids for sixawarded its second round of Integrated E&P Contracts for areas in therelating to Mexico’s Northern Region:region, including four onshore (Altamira, Pánuco, San Andrés and Tierra Blanca) and twoone offshore (Arenque(Arenque) block, to Petrofac, Schlumberger, Cheiron (Pico Petroleum) and Atún) blocks. A totalMonclova Pirineos Gas/Alfacid del Norte. Under these first eight Integrated E&P Contracts, contractors have committed to invest at least U.S. $425 million to develop proved reserves of 23 groups have purchased bidding rules for this roundaround 393 million barrels of contracts, and we have announced that offers are due on June 20,oil equivalent.

On December 14, 2012, with contract signing scheduled for June 20, 2012 through August 20, 2012. Pemex-Exploration and Production plans to initiate additional bidding roundssigned an Integrated E&P Contract for Chicontepec and for deep watersthe Ébano block with Grupo Diavaz, S.A. de C.V., a contractor developing this block. This contract replaced the previous contract, thereby modifying the framework under which Grupo Diavaz, S.A. de C.V. carries out activities in the Gulfarea.

On December 20, 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production launched a call for bids for the third round of MexicoIntegrated E&P Contracts relating to six blocks (Soledad, Amatitlán, Humapa, Pitepec, Miquetla and Miahuapan) located onshore in the coming months.

Collaboration Agreements

During 2007,Chicontepec basin. On July 11, 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production awarded Integrated E&P Contracts for the Humapa, Miquetla and Soledad blocks to Halliburton de México S. de R.L. de C.V., Operadora de Campos DWF (part of Grupo Diavaz, S.A. de C.V.) and Petrolite de México (part of Baker Hughes Inc.), respectively. In January 2014, following a new call for bids for the three remaining blocks that did not receive bids, Pemex-Exploration and Production awarded Integrated E&P Contracts to Consorcio Sinopa, S.A. for the Miahuapan block, Andes Energía Argentina, S.A., together with GAIA Ecológica, S.A. de C.V. and Integra Oil & Gas S.A.S. for the Amatitlán block and Constructora y Perforadora Latina, S.A. de C.V. for the Pitepec block. Together, these six blocks encompass an area of 953 square kilometers and represent combined investment commitments of more than U.S. $769 million during the first two years of their terms.

Collaboration and Other Agreements

Pemex-Exploration and Production has entered into non-commercial scientific and technology agreements with Statoil, Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Maersk Olie og Gas, Nexen, Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation and Eni S.p.A., E&P (Exploration and Production) Division. In 2008, Pemex-Exploration and Production entered into non-commercial scientific and technology agreements with Ecopetrol S.A., Chevron Deepwater Mexico, Inc., Total Cooperation Technique Mexique and Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada (S.A.S.). In 2009, Pemex-Exploration and Production entered into additional collaboration agreements with Chevron Deepwater Mexico, Inc., Statoil, Repsol Exploración México, S.A. de C.V., the following parties, which as of the date of this report remain in effect:

Tecpetrol Internacional, S.L., Schlumberger Offshore Services (México), N.V. and, SINOPEC International Petroleum Service Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. In 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production entered into additional non-commercial scientificPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. during 2009;

Shell Exploration Company (West) B.V. and technology agreements with SINOPEC International Petroleum Service Mexico, S. de R.LRepsol Exploración México, S.A. de C.V. during 2010;

Petrobank Energy and Resources, Ltd., Seabird Exploration Americas, Inc. and Total Cooperation Technique Mexique, S.A.S. during 2011;

BP Exploration Operating Co. Ltd. during 2012; and

Statoil Mexico A.S., ExxonMobil Ventures Mexico Limited,Ltd., Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation, Petróleo BrasileiroChevron Deepwater Mexico Inc., BG North America LLC, Itera Group LLC, Ecopetrol S.A. and Shell ExplorationOil Company (West) B.V. In 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production did not enter into any new non-commercial scientific and technology agreements. Lukoil during 2013.

Through these agreements, we seek to increase our technical and scientific knowledge in areas including deep-waterdeepwater subsalt

exploration and drilling; enhanced oil recovery processes, such as air injection; and reservoir characterization of complex structures. These broad agreements of technological and scientific collaboration are strictly non-commercial,i.e., there is no transfer of resources among the parties.

On April 12, 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production and Comercial Cupet S.A., on behalf of Unión Cuba-Petróleo (also known as Cupet), a Cuban state oil company, signed a non-binding letter of intent to discuss possible alternatives for future collaboration and participation in certain exploration and production blocks in the Cuban exclusive economic zone. The parties anticipate further discussions during 2012, but there has been no agreement about the nature or scope of any actual participation in oil exploration projects.Refining

Refining

Refining Processes and Capacity

Pemex-Refining’s production processes include the following:

 

  

Atmospheric distillationdistillation.. This process heats crude oil in a tube furnace at atmospheric pressure to distill refined products. The primary products produced are gasoline, kerosene, jet fuel, diesel, atmospheric gas oil and atmospheric residual crude oil.

 

  

Vacuum distillationdistillation.. This process heats crude oil or other feedstock in a vacuum distillation column, which is operated at low pressures. The objective of this process is to maximize production of heavy vacuum gas oil, which is produced by boiling crude oil.

 

  

CrackingCracking.. This process uses either heat and pressure or a catalytic agent to increase gasoline yields from crude oil.

 

  

VisbreakingVisbreaking.. This is a thermal cracking process, which uses a horizontal-tube heater fired to a high temperature. Visbreaking reduces flasher bottom viscosity and produces some heavy gas oil.

 

  

Reforming processesprocesses.. These processes use heat and catalysts to transform smaller or unstable hydrocarbon molecules into larger, more useful refining or blending products. For example,Pemex-Refining uses reforming processes to convert low octane gasoline into higher octane stocks that are suitable for blending into finished gasoline and to convert naphthas into more volatile, higher octane products.

 

  

Hydrotreatment or residual hydrocrackinghydrocracking.. This process uses a catalyst and hydrogen at high temperature and pressure to remove sulfur, nitrogen and some aromatic compounds. Hydrotreatment also processes some lighter liquid product off-take.

 

  

Alkylation and isomerizationisomerization.. This polymerization process unites olefins and isoparaffins. Butylenes and isobutanes are combined with sulfuric acid or hydrofluoric acid to rearrange straight-chain hydrocarbon molecules into branched-chain products. Pentanes and hexanes, which are difficult to reform, are isomerized through the use of aluminum chloride and other precious-metal catalysts. Normal butane may be isomerized to provide a portion of the isobutane feed needed for the alkylation process. The process produces a high octane, low sensitivity blending agent for gasoline.

 

  

CokingCoking.. This process is a severe method of thermal cracking used to upgrade heavy residuals into lighter products or distillates. Coking produces straight-run gasoline (coker naphtha) and various middle-distillate fractions used as catalytic feedstock, thus generating a concentrated solid material called coke of petroleum.

These production processes together constitute Pemex-Refining’s production capacity as set forth in the table below.

Refining Capacity by Production Process

 

  At December 31,   At December 31, 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 
  (in thousands of barrels per day)   (in thousands of barrels per day) 

Production Process

                    

Atmospheric distillation

   1,540.0     1,540.0     1,540.0     1,540.0     1,690.0     1,540.0     1,540.0     1,690.0     1,690.0     1,690.0  

Vacuum distillation

   754.0     754.0     754.0     754.0     832.0     754.0     754.0     832.0     832.0     832.0  

Cracking

   380.5     380.5     380.5     380.5     422.5     380.5     380.5     422.5     422.5     422.5  

Visbreaking

   91.0     91.0     91.0     91.0     91.0     91.0     91.0     91.0     91.0     91.0  

Reforming

   279.3     279.3     279.3     279.3     279.3     279.3     279.3     279.3     279.3     279.3  

Hydrotreatment

   926.1     926.1     926.1     1,010.1     1,067.5     926.1     1,010.1     1,067.5     1,067.5     1,067.5  

Alkylation and isomerization

   152.5     128.5     128.5     128.5     141.9     128.5     128.5     141.9     155.3     155.3  

Coking

   100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0     155.8     100.0     100.0     155.8     155.8     155.8  

Source: Base de Datos Institucional (Pemex Institutional Database, or Pemex BDI).

At the end of 2011,2013, Pemex-Refining owned and operated six refineries: Cadereyta, Madero, Minatitlán, Salamanca, Salina Cruz and Tula. Our refineries are comprised of atmospheric and vacuum distillation units, where the bulk of crude oil input is processed. Secondary processing facilities include desulfurization units and facilities for catalytic cracking, reforming and hydrotreating. During 2011,2013, our refineries processed 1,1671,224 thousand barrels per day of crude oil (171(189 thousand barrels per day at Cadereyta, 118130 thousand barrels per day at Madero, 152183 thousand barrels per day at Minatitlán, 171195 thousand barrels per day at Salamanca, 279282 thousand barrels per day at Salina Cruz and 277246 thousand barrels per day at Tula), which in total consisted of 732730 thousand barrels per day of Olmeca and Isthmus crude oil and 435495 thousand barrels per day of Maya crude oil.

Since 1993, through our subsidiary company, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V., we have participated in a limited partnership with Shell Oil Company in a refinery located in Deer Park, Texas, which has the capacity to process 340 thousand barrels per day of crude oil. Under the Deer Park Limited Partnership agreement, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. and Shell Oil Company each provide 50% of the refinery’s crude oil input and own 50% of the refinery’s output.

Production

Pemex-Refining produces a wide range of products derived from crude oil and natural gas, including LPG, gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, fuel oil, asphalts, lubricants and other refined products. Pemex-Refining produced 1,1901,276 thousand barrels per day of refined products (including dry gas by-products of the refining process) in 2011, a decrease2013, an increase of 3.2%4.1% from 20102012 levels. This decreaseincrease in refined products production was mainly due to operational issues at ourthe startup of new plants following the reconfiguration of the Minatitlán refinery and to the improved performance of the national refining facilities.system.

The following table sets forth, by category, Pemex-Refining’s production of petroleum products from 20072009 through 2011.2013.

Pemex-Refining Production

 

  Year ended December 31,   2011 vs.
2010
   Year ended December 31,   2013
vs. 2012
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
  (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%)   (in thousands of barrels per day)   (%) 

Refinery Crude Oil Runs

   1,269.8     1,261.0     1,294.9     1,184.1     1,166.7     (1.5   1,294.9     1,184.1     1,166.6     1,199.3     1,224.1     2.1  

Refined Products

                    

Liquefied petroleum gas

   26.6     25.9     27.1     25.5     21.4     (16.1   27.1     25.5     21.4     25.2     25.2     0  

Gasoline

                    

Pemex Magna

   425.7     418.7     364.0     341.2     324.2     (5.0   364.0     341.2     324.2     336.8     360.5     7.0  

Ultra Low Sulfur Magna(1)

             81.8     67.3     61.7     (8.3   81.8     67.3     61.7     61.5     56.7     (7.8

Pemex Premium(2)

   26.1     25.4     22.7     12.5     13.7     9.6     22.7     12.5     13.7     19.7     19.8     0.5  

Base

   4.5     6.5     3.0     3.0     0.7     (76.7   3.0     3.0     0.7     0.0     0.2       

Others

   0.1     0.1     0.1     0.1     0.0     (100.0   0.1     0.1     0.0     0.0     0.0     0  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   456.4     450.7     471.5     424.2     400.3     (5.6   471.5     424.2     400.3     418.1     437.3     4.6  

Kerosene (Jet fuel)

   66.3     64.0     57.1     51.9     56.3     8.5     57.1     51.9     56.3     56.6     60.8     7.4  

Diesel

                    

Pemex Diesel(3)

   326.2     336.1     291.4     221.0     193.6     (12.4   291.4     221.0     193.6     225.9     217.7     (3.6

Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel(1)

             44.5     67.7     80.1     18.3     44.5     67.7     80.1     72.6     92.1     26.9  

Others

   7.8     7.4     1.0     0.8     0.1     (87.5   1.0     0.8     0.1     1.0     3.7     270.0  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   334.0     343.5     337.0     289.5     273.8     (5.4   337.0     289.5     273.8     299.6     313.4     4.6  

Fuel oil

   301.5     288.7     316.2     322.3     307.5     (4.6   316.2     322.3     307.5     273.4     268.8     (1.7

Other refined products

                    

Asphalts

   31.9     34.3     31.9     24.9     26.1     4.8     31.9     24.9     26.1     23.1     18.7     (19.0

Lubricants

   5.2     5.1     4.2     4.3     3.7     (14.0   4.2     4.3     3.7     3.9     4.4     12.8  

Paraffins

   1.1     1.0     0.8     0.8     0.7     (12.5   0.8     0.8     0.7     0.8     0.7     (12.5

Still gas

   55.2     54.9     54.9     54.2     62.6     15.5     54.9     54.2     62.6     67.8     70.7     4.3  

Other refined products(4)

   34.2     38.8     42.0     31.7     37.9     19.6     42.0     31.7     37.9     57.3     75.7     32.1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   127.6     134.1     133.8     115.8     131.0     13.1     133.8     115.8     131.0     152.9     170.2     11.3  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total refined products

   1,312.4     1,306.9     1,342.7     1,229.1     1,190.2     (3.2   1,342.7     1,229.1     1,190.2     1,225.9     1,275.8     4.1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Production started in January 2009.
(2)Pemex Premium is an Ultra Low Sulfur gasoline with 0.003% sulfur content.
(3)Pemex Diesel is sold in the northern border market with 0.0015% sulfur content.
(4)Includes principally coke, along with other products such as aeroflex 1-2, furfural extract and light cyclic oil.

Source:Pemex BDI.

Fuel oil, automotive gasoline and diesels represent the bulk of Pemex-Refining’s production. In 2011,2013, fuel oil represented 25.8%21.1%, gasoline represented 33.6%34.3% and diesel fuel represented 23.0%24.6% of total petroleum products production. Jet fuel represented 4.7%4.8% and LPG represented 1.8%2.0% of total production of petroleum products in 2011.2013. The remainder of Pemex-Refining’s production consisted of a variety of other refined products.

As a result of our strategy of investing in technology to improve the quality of our fuels, over the past several years Pemex-Refining has increased its production of unleaded gasoline (including Pemex Premium) as opposed to leaded gasoline (gasoline base, a leaded gasoline, is produced only as a base for other products). All

all of our automotive gasoline production now consists of unleaded gasoline. In addition, we have introduced new environmentally sound products such as Ultra Low Sulfur gasoline and diesel. We also promote LPG as an environmentally sound substitute fuel for gasoline in motor vehicles.

Domestic Sales

We market a full range of refined products, including gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, fuel oil and petrochemicals. We are one of a few major producers of crude oil worldwide that experiences significant domestic demand for our refined products.

For the five years ended December 31, 2011,2013, the value of Pemex-Refining’s domestic sales of refined products and petrochemicals was as follows:

Value of Domestic Sales of Pemex-Refining(1)

 

 Year ended December 31, 2011
vs. 2010
  Year ended December 31, 2013
vs. 2012
 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 (in millions of pesos)(2) (%)  (in millions of pesos)(2) (%) 

Refined Products

            

Gasoline

            

Pemex Magna

  Ps.  209,006.5    Ps.  231,071.4    Ps.  233,307.2    Ps.  270,121.9    Ps.  300,936.8    11.4   Ps.233,307.2   Ps.270,121.9   Ps.300,936.8   Ps.326,187.2   Ps.340,751.9    4.5  

Pemex Premium

  38,331.9    34,909.6    25,180.3    24,987.2    27,520.1    10.1    25,180.3    24,987.2    27,520.1    42,486.0    63,723.4    50.0  

Aviation fuels

  212.9    236.9    240.9    247.1    353.4    43.0    240.9    247.1    353.4    396.2    370.8    (6.4

Others

  74.1    69.0    49.6    74.4    59.9    (19.5  49.6    74.4    59.9    95.6    43.4    (54.6
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total

  247,625.4    266,286.8    258,778.0    295,430.7    328,870.2    11.3    258,778.0    295,430.7    328,870.2    369,165.1    404,889.5    9.7  

Kerosene

            

Jet fuel

  23,369.3    31,936.4    18,320.7    22,935.3    31,560.2    37.6    18,320.7    22,935.3    31,560.2    36,336.5    35,417.9    (2.5

Other kerosenes

  183.2    101.9    119.2    179.0    215.9    20.6    119.2    179.0    215.9    224.0    275.4    22.9  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total

  23,552.5    32,038.3    18,439.9    23,114.3    31,776.1    37.5    18,439.9    23,114.3    31,776.1    36,560.5    35,693.3    (2.4

Diesel

            

Pemex Diesel

  84,752.0    96,434.7    106,129.0    125,556.4    142,559.8    13.5    106,129.0    125,556.4    142,559.8    163,113.6    178,929.4    9.7  

Others

  12,168.2    14,990.0    15,392.4    18,453.2    23,681.4    28.3    15,392.4    18,453.2    23,681.4    30,609.0    32,542.0    6.3  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total

  96,920.1    111,424.7    121,521.5    144,009.6    166,241.2    15.4    121,521.5    144,009.6    166,241.2    193,722.6    211,471.4    9.2  

Fuel oil

            

Total

  42,395.7    61,670.2    51,907.6    56,766.7    80,265.5    41.4    51,907.6    56,766.7    80,265.5    99,839.9    78,001.8    (21.9

Other refined products

            

Asphalts

  6,107.4    11,492.9    10,277.1    8,814.1    10,539.1    19.6    10,277.1    8,814.1    10,539.1    11,165.0    7,865.4    (29.6

Lubricants

  2,167.9    3,318.1    2,000.5    2,429.8    3,153.8    29.8    2,000.5    2,429.8    3,153.8    3,097.7    2,991.2    (3.4

Paraffins

  247.7    371.6    235.3    297.5    304.2    2.3    235.3    297.5    304.2    377.1    339.4    (10.0

Coke

  98.0    112.7    99.0    106.4    104.5    (1.8  99.0    106.4    104.5    346.3    473.4    36.7  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total

  Ps.      8,621.1    Ps.    15,295.3    Ps.    12,611.9    Ps.    11,647.7    Ps.    14,101.6    21.1   Ps.12,611.9   Ps.11,647.7   Ps.14,101.6   Ps.14,986.1   Ps.11,669.4    (22.1
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total Refined Products

  Ps.  419,114.8    Ps.  486,715.3    Ps.  463,258.8    Ps.  530,969.0    Ps.  621,254.5    17.0   Ps. 463,258.8   Ps. 530,969.0   Ps. 621,254.5   Ps. 714,274.2   Ps. 741,725.4    3.8  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Petrochemicals(3)

  Ps.      2,508.1    Ps.      3,288.4    Ps.      2,859.0    Ps.      4,089.7    Ps.      4,424.3    8.2   Ps.2,859.0   Ps.4,089.7   Ps.4,424.3   Ps.6,544.9   Ps.6,957.7    6.3  

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Excludes IEPS tax and value added tax. See “—Taxes and Duties” in this Item 4.
(2)Figures for 2007 are stated in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. Figures for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 are stated in nominal pesos. See “Item 3—Key Information—Selected Financial Data.”
(3)These are petrochemical products produced at refineries operated by Pemex-Refining.

Source:Pemex BDI.

The largest consumers of fuels in Mexico are the Federal Electricity Commission and our subsidiary entities. The Federal Electricity Commission consumed approximately 87%92% of our fuel oil production during 2011,2013, pursuant to a fuel oil supply contract entered into in November 1995 and amended effective January 1, 2005. Pursuant to this amendment, the minimum amount of fuel oil that we agreed to supply to the Federal Electricity Commission during 20112013 was 116,789155,700 barrels per day, in accordance with the supply capacity of

Pemex-Refining and the requirements of the Federal Electricity Commission under its official program of substitution of fuel oil with natural gas. The price per cubic meter of the fuel oil supplied to the Federal Electricity Commission is based on the three-month average spot price per cubic meter of Fuel Oil No. 6 (3% sulfur) at Houston, Texas, as quoted in Platt’s U.S. Marketscan and adjusted for quality and transportation cost differentials. In addition, the price of the fuel oil is discounted by a commercial margin on each cubic meter of fuel oil. In 2011,2013, this volume discount amounted to approximately 0.5%0.4% of our total fuel oil sales to the Federal Electricity Commission. The contract can be terminated by either party upon six months’ notice. The total amount paid to us by the Federal Electricity Commission under this contract in 20112013 was Ps. 70,13372,099 million, which represented 11.3%9.7% of our total revenues from domestic sales of refined products.

In 2011,2013, our domestic sales of refined products increased by Ps. 90,285.527,451.2 million, or 17.0%3.8% in value, as compared to 20102012 levels. This increase was primarily due to a 0.8%9.7% increase in domestic sales of gasoline and a 9.2% increase in domestic sales of diesel. This increase was partially offset by a 21.9% decrease in the sales of fuel oil, a 1.8% decrease in the volume of domestic distillates sales and higherlower international prices of refined products in 2011.2013.

The volume of Pemex-Refining’s domestic sales of refined products for the five-year period ended December 31, 20112013 was distributed as follows.follows:

Volume of Domestic Sales of Pemex-Refining

 

 Year ended December 31, 2011
vs. 2010
   Year ended December 31,   2013
vs. 2012
 
         2007                 2008                 2009                 2010                 2011           2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
 (in thousands of barrels per day, except where otherwise indicated) (%)   (in thousands of barrels per day, except where
otherwise indicated)
   (%) 

Refined Products

                  

Gasoline

                  

Pemex Magna

  658.9    706.2    727.7    743.7    738.6    (0.7)   727.7     743.7     738.6     715.3     667.6     (6.7

Pemex Premium

  101.3    85.7    64.1    57.8    60.5    4.7     64.1     57.8     60.5     87.7     119.2     35.9  

Aviation fuels

  0.5    0.5    0.5    0.5    0.5    0.0     0.5     0.5     0.5     0.5     0.5     0.0  

Others

  0.2    0.1    0.1    0.2    0.1    (50.0   0.1     0.2     0.1     0.2     0.1     (50.0
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

  760.9    792.6    792.4    802.2    799.7    (0.3   792.4     802.2     799.7     803.7     787.3     (2.0

Kerosenes

                  

Jet fuel

  67.9    65.0    55.0    55.8    56.1    0.5     55.0     55.8     56.1     59.3     62.2     4.9  

Other kerosenes

  0.9    0.4    0.4    0.6    0.6    0.0     0.4     0.6     0.6     0.6     0.7     16.7  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

  68.8    65.4    55.4    56.4    56.8    0.7     55.4     56.4     56.8     59.9     62.9     5.0  

Diesel

                  

Pemex Diesel

  314.5    332.0    314.5    325.1    330.6    1.7     314.5     325.1     330.6     339.4     333.2     (1.8

Others

  43.9    50.0    44.5    46.0    52.9    15.0     44.5     46.0     52.9     61.1     58.5     (4.3
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

  358.4    382.0    359.0    371.1    383.6    3.4     359.0     371.1     383.6     400.5     391.7     (2.2

Fuel oil

                  

Total

  256.9    219.6    209.0    184.9    200.6    8.5     209.0     184.9     200.6     214.4     189.3     (11.7

Other refined products

                  

Asphalts

  29.9    32.6    30.7    23.6    24.6    4.2     30.7     23.6     24.6     22.3     17.3     (22.4

Lubricants

  5.7    5.6    4.5    4.7    4.2    (10.6   4.5     4.7     4.2     4.1     4.7     14.6  

Paraffins

  1.1    1.0    0.8    0.8    0.8    0.0     0.8     0.8     0.8     0.8     0.7     (12.5

Coke

  33.1    35.9    38.0    30.0    31.0    3.3     38.0     30.0     31.0     49.8     47.8     (4.0
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

  69.8    75.0    73.9    59.1    60.6    2.5     73.9     59.1     60.6     77.1     70.6     (8.4
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total refined products

  1,514.8    1,534.6    1,489.7    1,473.6    1,501.2    1.9     1,489.7     1,473.6     1,501.2     1,555.5     1,501.8     (3.5
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Petrochemicals(1)

  290.9    278.9    365.4    325.0    292.0    (10.2   365.4     325.0     292.0     656.3     743.4     13.3  

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)In thousands of metric tons. These are petrochemical by-products of the refining process produced and sold by Pemex-Refining.

Source:Pemex BDI.

The volume of our domestic gasoline sales decreased by 0.3%2.0% in 2011,2013, from 802.2803.7 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 799.7787.3 thousand barrels per day in 2011.2013. The volume of our domestic diesel sales increaseddecreased by 3.4%2.2%, from 371.1400.5 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 383.6391.7 thousand barrels per day in 2011.2013. The volume of our domestic sales of fuel oil increaseddecreased by 8.5%11.7%, from 184.9214.4 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 200.6189.3 thousand barrels per day in 2011,2013, primarily due to an increasea decrease in the Federal Electricity Commission’s demand for fuel oil.

Since 1998, at the retail level, we have offered standard and premium grades of unleaded gasoline throughout Mexico. Since October 2006, all Pemex Premium gasoline has had an ultra-low sulfur content of 0.003%. Since January 2007, diesel sold at the northern border of Mexico has had a sulfur content of 0.0015%. Our efforts to build and enhance our brands have also progressed during the past five years. All of Mexico’s independent gasoline service stations now participate in our franchise program, which provides financial assistance to upgrade equipment and facilities, as well as technical assistance in the development of marketing and customer service programs. At the end of 2011,2013, there were 9,63710,416 retail service stations franchised or owned by Pemex-Refining, of which 9,58810,368 were privately owned and operated as franchises and 4948 were owned by Pemex-Refining. This total number of retail service stations represented an increase of 4.4%3.7% from the 9,23210,042 service stations as of December 31, 2010.2012.

Pricing Decrees

In September 2007, the Mexican Government announced that it was suspending the periodic increases in retail prices of unleaded gasoline and diesel from October 2007 to December 2007. On December 21, 2007, the Mexican Government renewed the periodic increases in these prices. During 2008, these increases ranged from two to ten Mexican cents per liter per month for unleaded gasoline.

On January 7, 2009, President Calderón announced theAcuerdo Nacional en favor de la Economía Familiar y el Empleo (National Agreement in Favor of Family Economy and Employment), an agreement aimed at mitigating the effects on Mexico of the global economic crisis. The agreement suspended the periodic increases in the retail price of unleaded gasoline until December 18, 2009. From December 19, 2009 to February 5, 2010, the Mexican Government renewed these periodic price increases, which ranged from three to nine Mexican cents per liter per month. From February 6, 2010 to December 9, 2011, the Mexican Government continued theseestablished periodic price increases, which ranged from four to eight Mexican cents per liter per month. From December 10, 2011 to April 14, 2012,January 4, 2013, the increases ranged from five to nine Mexican cents per liter per month

Periodic increases in diesel prices ranged from two to eight Mexican cents per liter per month during the first seven months of 2008, and from 20 to 30 Mexican cents per liter per month from August 2008 to February 6, 2009.month. From February 7, 2009January 5 to December 25, 2009, diesel prices were periodically increased by five31, 2013, the increases continued in increments of eleven Mexican cents per liter per month. On January 1, 2014, pursuant to theImpuesto a los Combustibles Fósiles (IEPS Tax on Fossil Fuels) approved under theLey del Impuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicios(Special Tax on Production and Services Law, which we refer to as the IEPS Law), unleaded gasoline became subject to a one-time price increase of tenMexican cents per liter. See “—Information on the Company—Taxes and Duties” in this Item 4. From January 1 to April 30, 2014, periodic increases ranged from nine to eleven Mexican cents per liter per month. See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—IEPS Tax, Hydrocarbon Duties and Other Taxes.”

From December 26, 2009 to December 9, 2011, the Mexican Government renewed theseestablished periodic price increases in increments of eight Mexican cents per liter per month. From December 10, 2011 to April 14, 2012,January 4, 2013, these periodic price increases continued in increments of tennine Mexican cents per liter per month. From January 5 to December 31, 2013 the increases continued in increments of eleven Mexican cents per liter per month. On January 1, 2014, pursuant to the IEPS Tax on Fossil Fuels, diesel became subject to a one-time price increase of thirteen Mexican cents per liter. From January 1 to April 30, 2014, periodic increases continued at a rate of eleven Mexican cents per liter per month. Despite these increases, diesel prices in Mexico have remained below most international diesel reference prices.

Since the early 1980s, the Mexican Government has also established a discount of 30% on the price at which we sell gas oil intended for domestic use to the state of Chihuahua during the months of January, February and December of each year.

On January 29, 2008, the Mexican Government established a discount of 10% on the price at which we sell fuel oil1, 2014, pursuant to the Federal Electricity Commission. This discount was effective from January 1, 2008IEPS Tax on Fossil Fuels, such gas oil became subject to March 31, 2008. From April 2008 to November 2008, the discount was 8%. a one-time price increase of 10.857 Mexican cents per liter.

Since December 2008, the price at which we sell fuel oil to the Federal Electricity Commission has been linked to international market prices in accordance with a pricing methodology established by the Mexican Government. This methodology is based on the price of fuel oil in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico coastal region, and is then adjusted for quality as well as expenses related to distribution.

In addition, during 2009, pursuant to the National Agreement in Favor of Family Economy and Employment, the international reference price we use in sales of fuel oil to the Federal Electricity Commission was changed from a three-month daily average to a one-month daily average in an effort to reduce the cost of electricity to end users. On January 8, 2009, and also under the National Agreement in Favor of Family Economy and Employment, a resolution was issued establishing terms and conditions applicable to the transportation, storage, distribution and first-hand sale of fuel oil and basic petrochemicals, as well as related pricing methodologies.

On January 1, 2014, pursuant to the IEPS Tax on Fossil Fuels, periodic prices increases in fuel oil of 13.45 Mexican cents per liter per month became effective.

On February 13, 2014, the Energy Regulatory Commission authorized Pemex-Refining to decrease the prices at which it sells wholesale fuel oil to the Federal Electricity Commission from February to August 2014. This period may be modified by the Energy Regulatory Commission. Pemex-Refining requested this price decrease with the aim of increasing the Federal Electricity Commission’s demand for fuel oil processed at the Miguel Hidalgo refinery in Tula.

The Mexican Government could modify these price controls or impose additional price controls in the future. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to theOur Relationship between PEMEX andwith the Mexican Government—The Mexican Government has imposed price controls in the domestic market on PEMEX’sour products.”

Investments

Over the past several years, Pemex-Refining has focused its investment program on enhancing the quality of the gasoline and diesel it produces to meet new environmental standards in Mexico, improving its ability to process heavy crudescrude oils in order to optimize the crude oil blend in its refineries and increasing the production of unleaded gasoline and diesel to supply growing demand at low cost, as opposed to increasing its overall crude oil processing capacity.Thiscapacity. This focus is primarily the result of the abundance of heavy crudescrude oils in Mexico. In addition, due to the reduced availability of heavy crude oil in the export markets, the lower cost of raw materials in Mexico leads to higher profit margins on the heavy crude oil we do export. In the medium term, Pemex-Refining will continue to import unleaded gasoline to satisfy domestic demand. During 2011,2013, Pemex-Refining imported approximately 405357 thousand barrels per day of unleaded gasoline, which represented approximately 50.7%45% of total domestic demand for unleaded gasoline in that year. In 2011,2013, Pemex-Refining invested Ps. 25,15729,794 million in capital expenditures, 11.1%2.9% more than its Ps. 22,63628,944 million of capital expenditures in 2010.2012. Of this total investment, Pemex-Refining allocated Ps. 2,850 million to the Minatitlán project, Ps. 2,130 million to its investments to expand and upgrade refineries and related installations, Ps. 8,506 million to environmental and industrial safety projects, Ps. 9,279 million to rehabilitation projects, Ps. 2,332 million to other projects and acquisitions and Ps. 605,204 million to the new refinery in Tula, Hidalgo, of which Ps. 351,639 million was for preinvestmentpre-investment studies and Ps. 25469 million was for other expenses related to this refinery, Ps. 2,801 million to fuel quality investments, Ps. 909 million to the residual conversion from the Salamanca refinery, Ps. 255 million to the Tuxpan pipeline and corresponding storage and distribution terminals and Ps. 20,625 million to investments related to other projects. The following sections provide a description of each of these projects.

New Refinery at Tula. On August 12, 2009, we announced the construction of a new refinery in Tula. The new refinery is expected to have a Maya crude oil processing capacity of 250 thousand barrels per day, and to produce approximately 163 thousand barrels per day of gasoline and 117 thousand barrels per day of diesel. All distilled products processed at the refinery will meet ultra-low sulfur content specifications and no fuel oil will be produced. During 2013, we spent a total amount of Ps. 5,204 million on this project, of which Ps. 1,639 million was spent on pre-investment studies and Ps. 469.0 million on other investments at this new refinery. In June 2013, we announced a change in the scope of the project. See “—Vacuum Residue Processing at Miguel Hidalgo Refinery” below in this Item 4. As of the date of this report, we are conducting engineering studies that are necessary to complete prior to beginning construction of the refinery and are in the basic engineering design phase. These studies consist of conceptual studies related to material balances and process flowsheets, a

preliminary plot plan, preliminary piping and instrument diagrams, definition and sizing of main equipment resulting in process specifications, specification of effluents and definition of control and safety devices.

During 2013, the following contracts were awarded in connection with the construction of the refinery at Tula:

Contractor(s) & facilities

Contract DateContract Amount
(in millions of
U.S. dollars)
Startup Date

Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo

January 2013U.S. $7.2January 2013

For the processing design package, as well as technical assistance and the licensing of refinery technologies, for the naphtha hydrotreater plant that is expected to have a processing capacity of 44 thousand barrels per day.

Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo

January 2013U.S. $7.0January 2013

For the processing design package, as well as technical assistance and the licensing of refinery technologies, for the diesel hydrotreater plant that is expected to have a processing capacity of 61 thousand barrels per day.

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Facultad de Química)

January 2013U.S. $5.6January 2013

For environmental impact studies.

Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo

February 2013U.S. $7.0February 2013

For technical assistance to Pemex-Refining during the Front End Engineering Design (or FEED) phase, which consists of studies related to the technical requirements and investment costs necessary for a project.

Comisión Federal de Electricidad

February 2013U.S. $0.2February 2013

For the inspection and approval of the relocation of the 400 kV Tula-Querétaro and Tula-Poza Rica electric transmission lines to the security zone associated with the terrain where the new refinery is being developed, as well as support in the evaluation of related bids.

Construcciones e Instalaciones del Noreste S.A. de C.V. and Isolux de México, S.A. de C.V.

April 2013U.S. $12.1May 2013

For the relocation of two high tension electric transmission lines that run across the land on which the refinery is being developed.

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Facultad de Química)

May 2013U.S. $1.9May 2013

For technical assistance during the FEED phase of water management.

Technip USA, Inc.

May 2013U.S. $1.4May 2013

For the processing design package, as well as technical assistance and the licensing of refinery technologies, for the hydrogen plant that is expected to have a processing capacity of 80 thousand million square feet per day.

Comisión Federal de Electricidad

May 2013U.S. $1.8May 2013

For the geohydrologic evaluation to determine the underground water supply’s potential for use at the new refinery.

Emerson Process Management, S.A. de C.V.

July 2013U.S. $2.0July 2013

For engineering services for the supply of the comprehensive control and safety systems.

As of December 31, 2013, the total estimated cost of the refinery at Tula was Ps. 149.8 billion (equivalent to U.S. $11,610.0 million).

Vacuum Residue Processing at Miguel Hidalgo Refinery. The new refinery at Tula was originally slated to process vacuum residue from the existing Miguel Hidalgo refinery for conversion into high value fuels. However, in June 2013, we announced that the Miguel Hidalgo refinery would instead be reconfigured to process its vacuum residue on site. The reconfigured refinery is expected to process 76 thousand barrels per day of vacuum residue in order to convert it into high value fuels such as gasoline and diesel. All distilled products processed at the refinery will meet ultra-low sulfur content specifications and no fuel oil will be produced. In addition, the reconfigured refinery is expected to have a crude oil processing capacity of 315 thousand barrels per day, of which 35% will be Maya crude oil and 65% will be Isthmus crude oil, and to produce approximately 161 thousand barrels per day of gasoline and 101 thousand barrels per day of diesel. During 2013, we spent Ps. 26.0 million on pre-investment studies for the Miguel Hidalgo reconfiguration project. As of the date of this report, we are in the process of evaluating the nature and timing of this project.

In September 2013, ICA Fluor Daniel, S. de R.L. was awarded a U.S. $94.8 million contract to carry out studies and to provide engineering services for the first phase of the reconfiguration of the Miguel Hidalgo refinery.

As of December 2013, the total estimated cost of the reconfiguration of the Miguel Hidalgo refinery for vacuum residue processing was Ps. 53.4 billion (equivalent to U.S. $4,140.0 million) and the project is scheduled to be completed by the beginning of 2018.

Clean Fuels Project.This project is being developed in our six refineries, with a first phase involving the installation of eight ultra-low sulfur gasoline (ULSG) post-treatment units, the capacities of which are set forth below by refinery. This phase of the project is being carried out among 3three groups of our refineries, as follows: group 1, Tula (43.9% complete) and Salamanca (41.3% complete) (group 1); Cadereyta (68.4% complete)(73.3% and Madero (54.8% complete) (group 2); and Minatitlán and Salina Cruz (30.5% and 29.8%76.7% complete, respectively) (group 3), with construction expected to be completed by 2013.2015; group 2, Cadereyta and Madero (98.5% and 92.1% complete, respectively), with construction completed at Cadereyta in December 2013 and construction at Madero expected to be completed by the end of 2014; and group 3, Minatitlán and Salina Cruz (81.2% and 84.7% complete, respectively), with construction expected to be completed by 2015.

 

CadereytaMaderoMinatitlánSalamancaSalina CruzTula

ULSG units (tbpd)

1 (42)2 (20)1 (25)1 (25)2 (25)1 (30)
   Cadereyta  Madero  Minatitlán  Salamanca  Salina Cruz Tula

ULSG units (tbpd)

  1(42)  2(20)  1(25)  1(25)  2(25) 1(30)

 

Note: tbpd = thousand barrels per day.

Source: Pemex-Refining.

The second phase of the Clean Fuels Project involves the construction of five new ultra-low sulfur diesel facilities and the reconfiguration of 17 existing units. This portion of the project will be carried out in two phases: (i) a Cadereyta diesel phase and (ii) a diesel phase for the 5five remaining refineries. The engineering development for the Cadereyta diesel phase was completed in 2010 and an independent expert delivered his final due diligence report on the project in MarchFebruary 2012. Construction began in March 2013 and is expected to beginbe completed in October 2012.2016. Basic engineering for the facilities associated with the diesel phase in the 5five remaining refineries is expected to bewas completed in August 2012,December 2013, and construction is expected to begin in the second quarter of 2013.2014 and end in 2017. Until construction is completed, we will import ultra-low sulfur fuels in order to meet local demand.

The following table sets forth, by refinery, the number of new as well as reconfigured units under the Clean Fuels Project diesel phase.

Clean Fuels Project New and Reconfigured Units

 

   Refineries 

Processing plants

  Cadereyta   Madero   Minatitlán   Salamanca   Salina Cruz   Tula   Total 

New gasoline post-treatment units

   1     2     1     1     2     1     8  

New diesel units

   1     2     1     1               5  

Reconfigured diesel units

   3     1     1     3     4     5     17  

 

Source: Pemex-Refining.

New Refinery at Tula. On August 12, 2009, with the required donation of land for the project by the government of Hidalgo having been completed, we announced the construction of a new refinery in Tula in the state of Hidalgo. The new refinery is expected to have a Maya crude oil processing capacity of 250 thousand barrels per day, and to produce approximately 142 thousand barrels per day of gasoline, 130 thousand barrels per day of diesel and 12 thousand barrels per day of jet fuel. All distilled products processed at the refinery will meet ultra-low sulfur content specifications and no fuel oil will be produced. During 2011, we spent Ps. 35 million on pre-investment studies and Ps. 25 million on other investments for this new refinery. On February 15, 2012, we awarded to ICA Fluor Daniel, an industrial engineering company jointly owned by Empresas ICA, S.A.B. de C.V. and Fluor Corporation, a U.S. $135 million contract for engineering and management services for the first phase of the construction of the new refinery. This contract has a term of 421 days, and will go into effect on March 12, 2012. As of December 2011, the total estimated cost of the refinery was Ps. 149.8 billion (equivalent to U.S. $11,610 million), and the project is scheduled to be completed in 2016.

Reconfiguration of the Salamanca Refinery.Refinery. The reconfiguration of the “Ingeniero Antonio M. Amor” refinery in Salamanca focuses on the conversion of residuals into high-value distillates (without a need for increased crude oil processing), as well as on upgrading of the lubricants train to produce group II lubricants (which contain almost no impurities and therefore have superior anti-oxidation properties). As part of the reconfiguration, Pemex-Refining will construct new plants, which will include the following: a delayed coker unit, a catalytic cracking unit, a hydrogen plant, a coker naphtha hydrotreater, a gas oil hydrotreater, a lubricants plant, a naphtha reformer, a sulfur plant, an amine regeneration unit, a sour water treatment facility, utilities and outside battery limits infrastructure, which includes water treatment facilities, feed tanks and other utilities and support facilities required to maintain a plant. Other units, including certain distillation vacuum units (including the AA, AS and AI units) will undergo renovations. In addition, the reconfiguration will involve site preparation, the development of temporary infrastructure and the erection of a perimeter wall surrounding the refinery. The timeline for the project is as follows:

construction of the perimeter wall began in October 2013 and is expected to increase the capacitybe completed by May 2014;

work related to site preparation and the profitability of this refinery. In 2011, temporary infrastructure projects began on March 20, 2014 and is expected to be completed by September 23, 2015;

we completed the concept development and planningexpect to obtain all necessary equipment at an early stage of the project;project, beginning in addition, we beganAugust 2014;

a tender process for the basic engineering stageconstruction of new plants and renovations is scheduled to launch in November 2014;

construction of the deep-cut vacuum distillation unitnew plants is scheduled to begin during the second half of 2015; and we completed

the extended basic engineering stage of the delayed coker unit. We also plan to continue to make the investments contemplated by the basic engineering contracts for other facilities within this refinery, which include contracts for fluid catalytic cracking, heavy waste unit (H-Oil) reconfiguration catalytic reforming unit reconfiguration, gas oil hydrotreating and modernization of lubricants, sulfur and hydrogen.

Minatitlán Project. This refining project is intendedexpected to increase production of high quality gasoline and middle distillates and to increase Maya crude oil processing to 70% of all crude oil processing performed. The work associated with Minatitlán project was subdivided into six contracts awarded through competitive bidding from 2003 to 2005. The contract amount and date of commencement of operations of the facilities comprising each contract package are as follows:

be completed in late 2018.

Package

 

Contractor(s) & facilities

  Contract Date  Contract
Amount
(in millions of
U.S. dollars)
   Startup
Date

1

 

Tradeco Infraestructura, S.A. de C.V. and Pager de Tabasco, S.A. de C.V.

  November 2003  U.S.  $43.8    November 2003

2

 

ICA Fluor Daniel, S. de R.L. de C.V.

 

        Utilities

        Outside Battery Limits

        Sour water treatment facility

  October 2004  U.S.  $756.4    September 2009

May 2009

August 2010

3

 

Dragados Proyectos Industriales de México, S.A. de C.V. and Dragados Industrial, S.A.

  October 2004  U.S.  $534.1    
 

 

    Atmospheric and vacuum unit to process
    100% Maya crude oil

        Catalytic cracking unit

        Diesel hydrotreatment unit

      July 2011

August 2011

July 2010

4

 

Mina-Trico, S. de R.L. de C.V.

 

        Gas oil hydrotreatment plant

        Hydrogen unit

        Sulfur Recovery unit

  February 2005  U.S.  $317.0    October 2011

August 2010

September 2010

5

 

Proyectos Ebramex, S. de R.L. de C.V.

 

        Delayed coker unit

        Amine regenerator plant

        Coker naphtha hydrotreatment unit

  February 2005  U.S.  $317.9    December 2011

December 2011

May 2011

6

 

Samsung Ingeniería Minatitlán, S.A. de C.V. and Samsung Engineering Co. Ltd.

  February 2005  U.S.  $154.1    
 

        Alkylation unit—U-18000

        Alkylation unit—U-19000

      November 2011

February 2012

During 2011, we spent an estimated Ps. 2,850 million on the Minatitlán project.

Tuxpan Pipeline.Pipeline. This project is intended to help meet the increasing demand for refined products in the metropolitan area of the Mexico Valley. The total cost of the project is Ps. 3,3743,564 million, which includes the construction of a pipeline measuring 18 inches in diameter and 109 kilometers in length, five storage tanks located at the Tuxpan Maritime Terminal with a capacity of 100,000 barrels each and a research study to determine the best option for the discharge of refined products from tankers and pipelines to these storage tanks. ARB Arendal, S. de R.L. de C.V. began construction of the pipeline in June 2009. The pipeline is scheduled to bewas completed in JuneOctober 2012 and started full operations in November 2012. Tradeco Infraestructura, Tradeco Industrial, ITECSA and Grupo OLRAM were, in association, awarded the contract for construction of the storage tanks, which they began in October 20092009. Two of the five storage tanks are in operation and the three remaining tanks are scheduledexpected to complete in September 2012. Finally,begin operating during the first half of 2014. The Federal Electricity Commission conducted the research study, the results of which were delivered to us in April 2010. The Federal Electricity Commission concluded that we do not need to invest in additional discharge systems, due to our having a sufficient amount of monobuoys already in operation.

Minatitlán Project. This refining project is intended to increase production of high quality gasoline and middle distillates and to increase Maya crude oil processing to 70% of all crude oil processing performed. The work associated with the Minatitlán project was subdivided into six contracts awarded through competitive bidding from 2003 to 2005. The original and final contract amount and date of commencement of operations of the facilities comprising each contract package are as follows:

Package

  

Contractor(s) & facilities

  

Contract Date

  Original
Contract
Amount

(in millions
of U.S.
dollars)
   Final
Contract
Amount

(in millions of
U.S. dollars)(1)
   

Startup

Date

1

  

Tradeco Infraestructura, S.A. de C.V. and Pager de Tabasco, S.A. de C.V.

  November 2003  U.S. $40.0    U.S. $43.8    July 2005

2

  

ICA Fluor Daniel, S. de R.L. de C.V.

  October 2004  U.S. $692.6    U.S. $1,170.4    
  

Utilities

        September 2009
  

Outside Battery Limits

        May 2009
  

Sour water treatment facility

        August 2010

3

  

Dragados Proyectos Industriales de México, S.A. de C.V. and Dragados Industrial, S.A.

  October 2004  U.S. $534.1    U.S. $867.3    
  

 

Atmospheric and vacuum unit to process 100% Maya crude oil

        

 

September 2011

  

Catalytic cracking unit

        October 2011
  

Diesel hydrotreatment unit

        August 2010

4

  Mina-Trico, S. de R.L. de C.V.  February 2005  U.S. $317.0    U.S. $538.8    
  

Gas oil hydrotreatment plant

        November 2011
  

Hydrogen unit

        August 2010
  

Sulfur Recovery unit

        October 2010

5

  

Proyectos Ebramex, S. de R.L. de C.V.

  February 2005  U.S. $317.9    U.S. $516.4    
  

 

Delayed coker unit

        

 

December 2011

  

Amine regenerator plant

        December 2011
  

Coker naphtha hydrotreatment unit

        July 2011

6

  

Samsung Ingeniería Minatitlán, S.A. de C.V. and Samsung Engineering Co. Ltd.

  February 2005  U.S. $154.1    U.S. $190.9    
  

Alkylation unit—U-18000

        November 2011
  

Alkylation unit—U-19000

        January 2012

(1)Final contract amounts include an additional payment made pursuant to the terms of the contracts, which in each case was authorized by theSecretaría de la Función Pública (Ministry of Public Function, which we refer to as the SFP).

As of January 2012, all units and facilities of the Minatitlán project have been completed and are in operation. Accordingly, all contracts awarded in connection with the Minatitlán project were completed in 2013. The estimated total cost of the project was U.S. $4,044 million.

2014 Refining Investment Budget. For 2012,2014, Pemex-Refining has budgeted Ps. 45,93040,699 million of capital expenditures. Pemex-Refining will invest 21%24% of this amount to expand and upgrade refineries and related installations, 13.5%6% on the planning of the new refinery in Tula, 29%24% on environmental and industrial safety projects, 27.5%35% on rehabilitation projects and 9%11% on other projects and acquisitions.

Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Natural Gas and Condensates

Pemex-Exploration and Production’s average natural gas production decreased by 6.1%0.2% in 2011,2013, from 7,0206,385 million cubic feet per day in 20102012 to 6,5946,370 million cubic feet per day in 2011,2013, while the average wet natural gas processed by Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals increased by 1.2%0.5%, from 4,4724,382 million cubic feet per day in 20102012 to 4,5274,404 million cubic feet per day in 2011. Natural gas production associated with crude oil production accounted for 66.6% of total natural gas production in 2011, with the remainder of natural gas production consisting of extraction from fields holding natural gas reserves. Although natural gas production is more geographically diverse than crude oil production, 166 fields (or 39.9% of the 416 producing fields) accounted for 33.4% of all natural gas production in 2011. Of total natural gas production, 39.6% originated in the Marine regions, 25.7% in the Southern region and the remainder, 34.7%, originated in the Northern region.2013.

All wet natural gas production is directed to Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ gas processing facilities. At the end of 2011,2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals owned 11nine facilities.

The following facilities are located in the Southern region:

 

  

Nuevo Pemex. This facility contains 13 plants that together in 20112013 produced 949925 million cubic feet per day of dry gas, 18 thousand barrels per day of ethane, 4442 thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas, 2419 thousand barrels per day of naphtha and 173136 thousand tons of sulfur.

 

  

Cactus. This facility contains 22 plants that together in 20112013 produced 816746 million cubic feet per day of dry gas, (which is natural gas with a methane content of more than 90.5%), 2017 thousand barrels per day of ethane, 3229 thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas, 14 thousand barrels per day of naphtha and 230249 thousand tons of sulfur.

 

  

Ciudad Pemex. This facility contains eight plants that together in 20112013 produced 715735 million cubic feet per day of dry gas and 218220 thousand tons of sulfur.

 

  

La Venta. This facility contains one plant that produced 127140 million cubic feet per day of dry gas in 2011.

2013.

 

  

Matapionche. This facility contains five plants that together in 20112013 produced 4123 million cubic feet per day of dry gas, one thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas, 0.50.3 thousand barrels per day of naphtha and 5four thousand tons of sulfur.

The facilities located in Morelos, Cangrejera and Pajaritos form the Coatzacoalcos area gas processing complex (which we refer to as a GPC):

Morelos. This facility contains one plant that in 2013 produced 35 thousand barrels per day of ethane, 41 thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas and eleven thousand barrels per day of naphtha.

 

  

Morelos.Cangrejera. This facility contains one planttwo plants that together in 2011 that2013 produced 3229 thousand barrels per day of ethane, 39 thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas and 10ten thousand barrels per day of naphtha.

 

  

Cangrejera. This facility contains two plants that together in 2011 produced 36 thousand barrels per day of ethane, 45 thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas and 12 thousand barrels per day of naphtha.

Pajaritos. This facility contains one plant that produced 9ten thousand barrels per day of ethane in 2011.

2013.

The following facilities are located in the Northern region:

 

  

Burgos. This facility contains nine plants that together in 20112013 produced 896906 million cubic feet per day of dry gas, 20 thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas and 2017 thousand barrels per day of naphtha.

 

  

Poza Rica. This facility contains fourfive plants that together in 20112013 produced 120187 million cubic feet per day of dry gas, 50.4 thousand barrels per day of ethane, 5six thousand barrels per day of liquefied gas, onetwo thousand barrels per day of naphtha and 7five thousand tons of sulfur.

  

Arenque. This facility contains three plants that together in 20112013 produced 2731 million cubic feet per day of dry gas, 1.5two thousand barrels per day of a blend of ethane and natural gas liquids and 3four thousand tons of sulfur.

The following tables set forth Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ total natural gas processing and production, as well as processing capacity, for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Natural Gas and Condensates Processing and Production(1)

 

  Year ended December 31,   2011
vs. 2010
   Year ended December 31,   2013
vs. 2012
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
  

(in millions of cubic feet per day,

except where otherwise indicated)

   (%)   (in millions of cubic feet per day,
except where otherwise indicated)
   (%) 

Processing

                        

Wet gas

   4,283     4,240     4,436     4,472     4,527     1.2     4,436     4,472     4,527     4,382     4,404     0.5  

Sour gas

   3,162     3,188     3,381     3,422     3,445     0.7     3,381     3,422     3,445     3,395    ��3,330     (1.9

Sweet gas(2)

   1,120     1,052     1,055     1,050     1,082     3.0     1,055     1,050     1,082     987     1,074     8.8  

Condensates(3)

   79     54     51     53     57     7.5     51     53     57     46     46     0.0  

Gas to natural gas liquids extraction

   4,264     4,224     4,399     4,458     4,483     0.6     4,399     4,458     4,483     4,346     4,381     0.8  

Wet gas

   4,134     4,085     4,252     4,304     4,347     1.0     4,252     4,304     4,347     4,206     4,234     0.7  

Reprocessing streams(4)

   130     139     146     154     136     (11.7   146     154     136     140     147     5.0  

Production

                        

Dry gas(5)

   3,546     3,461     3,572     3,618     3,692     2.0     3,572     3,618     3,692     3,628     3,693     1.8  

Natural gas liquids(6)(7)

   405     376     378     383     389     1.6     378     383     389     365     362     (0.8

Liquefied petroleum gas(6)

   199     182     181     184     185     0.5     181     184     185     176     178     1.1  

Ethane(6)

   119     117     121     119     121     1.7     121     119     121     115     109     (5.2

Naphtha(6)(8)

   85     74     76     79     82     3.8     76     79     82     72     73     1.4  

Sulfur(9)

   659     660     712     670     636     (5.1   712     670     636     592     620     4.7  

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Excludes operations of Pemex-Exploration and Production. Pemex-Exploration and Production produced a total of 6,5946,370 million cubic feet per day of natural gas in 2011.2013.
(2)Includes sweet vapor from condensates.
(3)Includes internal streams.
(4)Reprocessing of pipeline dry gas at variousthe Pajaritos cryogenic plants.plant.
(5)Does not include ethane reinjected into the natural gas stream.
(6)In thousands of barrels per day.
(7)Includes stabilized condensates, reprocessing streams from the Cangrejera petrochemical complex and other streams for fractionating.
(8)Includes pentanes.
(9)In thousands of tons.

Source:Pemex BDI.

Processing Capacity

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 
  

(in millions of cubic feet per day,

except where otherwise indicated)

   

(in millions of cubic feet per day,

except where otherwise indicated)

 

Sweetening plants

                    

Sour condensates(1)

   144     144     144     144     144     144     144     144     144     144  

Sour natural gas

   4,503     4,503     4,503     4,503     4,503     4,503     4,503     4,503     4,503     4,503  

Natural gas liquids recovery plants

                    

Cryogenics(2)

   5,392     5,592     5,792     5,792     5,712     5,792     5,792     5,712     5,912     5,912  

Absorption(3)

   350     350                                          
  

 

   

 

 �� 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   5,742     5,942     5,792     5,792     5,712     5,792     5,792     5,712     5,912     5,912  

Natural gas liquids fractionating(1)(4)

   587     587     569     569     569     569     569     569     569     569  

Processing of hydrosulfuric acid

   219     219     219     219     219     219     219     219     219     219  

 

(1)In thousands of barrels per day.
(2)In 2008, an additional modular2009, cryogenic plant started operations at the Burgos complex, with a capacity of 200 million cubic feet per day. In 2009, another cryogenic plantNo. 6, began operations at the Burgos complex, with a capacity of 200 million cubic feet per day. Since JanuaryDecember 2011, the cryogenic plant at Cangrejera has been out of service. In October 2011, the capacity atof the Nuevo Pemex complex cryogenic plant number 1 at the Nuevo Pemex complex was reduced from 1,550 to 1,500 million cubic feet per day. In November 2012, cryogenic plant No. 2 began operations at the Poza Rica GPC, with a capacity of 200 million cubic feet per day.

(3)On August 31, 2009, the absorption plant at the Reynosa complex was shut down.
(4)The liquids fractionating plant at the Reynosa complex has been out of service since August 31, 2009.

Source:Pemex BDI.

Domestic consumption of dry gas totaled 5,573.05,735.7 million cubic feet per day in 2011,2013, a 1.2%1.3% increase from the 20102012 domestic consumption of 5,508.95,660.8 million cubic feet per day. The subsidiary entities consumed approximately 39.3%39.6% of the total domestic dry gas consumed in 2011,2013, while the industrial-distributor sector consumed 21.3%19.8%, the electrical sector consumed 33.8%33.5%, the electrical autogeneration sector consumed 2.5% and the trading sector consumed 3.1%4.6%.

We import dry gas to satisfy shortfalls in our production and to meet demand in areas of northern Mexico that, due to their distance from the fields, can be supplied more efficiently by importing natural gas from the United States. WeIn addition, in August 2013, we announced a natural gas supply strategy developed in partnership with the Mexican Government to address the domestic natural gas shortages. Under this strategy, we will increase our liquefied natural gas imports in the short-term. See “—Business Overview—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Natural Gas Supply Strategy” in this Item 4. In 2013, we imported 790.81,289.7 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, in 2011, an increase of 47.6%18.4% from the 535.81,089.3 million cubic feet per day imported in 2010.2012, due to lower availability of sour wet natural gas and dry gas from Pemex-Exploration and Production’s fields. The total amount of natural gas imported per day in 2013 included 114.3 million cubic feet of liquefied natural gas imported through Manzanillo.

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals processes sour and sweet condensates in order to obtain stabilized natural gas liquids and also producesrecovers liquid hydrocarbons obtained from the processing of sweet natural gas. In addition, we obtain natural gas liquids from internal streams and recovered in surface separating facilities, as well as liquid hydrocarbons condensed in naturalsour wet gas pipelines. Our production of natural gas liquids, including stabilized condensates, and reprocessing and other fractionating streams, increaseddecreased by 1.6%0.8% from 383365 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 389362 thousand barrels per day in 2011.2013.

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals processes sour condensates, which have a higher sulfur content, to produce stabilized sweet condensates. The volume of sour condensates we processed from Pemex-Exploration and Production and internal streams of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals amounted to 42.435.0 thousand barrels per day in 2011,2013, a 9.6% increase2.8% decrease from the 38.736.0 thousand barrels per day processed in 2010.2012. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals also processes sweet condensates at its Burgos facilities to produce naphthalight and heavy naphtha.natural gasoline.

In January 2009, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals began the construction of a cryogenic plant at the Poza Rica gas processing complex (GPC),GPC, which is expected to havehas a processing capacity of 200 million cubic feet per day of sweet wet gas, as well as a liquids fractionating plant.gas. The project also includes, among others installations, the construction of two storage tanks for liquid gas, each with an expecteda capacity of 20 thousand barrels. This cryogenic plant is scheduled to beginbegan operating in AugustNovember 2012.

Since January 2011, the cryogenic plant at Cangrejera has been out of service due to a lack of raw material necessary for this plant to operate. In October 2011, the Nuevo Pemex complex cryogenic plant’s total capacity was adjusted from 1,550 to 1,500 million cubic feet per day.

The Regulatory Law currently limits basic petrochemicals to the following nine products that are used in the petrochemical production process: ethane, propane, butane, pentanes, hexane, heptane, carbon black naphthasfeedstocks, natural gasoline and methane, when obtained from hydrocarbon reservoirs in Mexico and used as raw material for petrochemical industrial processes. All other petrochemical products may be produced by Pemex-Petrochemicals, byPemex-Refining or by private sector companies. However, the Regulatory Law also allows companies that produce basic petrochemicals, as by-products of non-basic petrochemical production, to sell them either internally, within plants in the same unit or complex, or to sell them to Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities.

Natural Gas Supply Strategy

On August 13, 2013, we and the Mexican Government presented a strategy to address domestic natural gas shortages in the short, medium and long term. In the short-term, we will increase our liquefied natural gas

imports and switch from using natural gas to using fuel oil at our facilities. In the medium-term, we plan to construct additional pipelines and compression stations. Finally, we expect to continue to increase oil and shale gas reserves in order to satisfy domestic demand for natural gas in the long-term. The specific components of this strategy, including our role, may be impacted by the changes contemplated as part of the Energy Reform Decree. See “—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform” in this Item 4.

Over the five years ended December 31, 2011,2013, the value of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ domestic sales was distributed as follows.follows:

Value of Domestic Sales of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals(1)

 

 Year ended December 31, 2011
vs.  2010
  Year ended December 31, 2013
vs. 2012
 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 (in millions of pesos)(2) (%)  (in millions of pesos)(2) (%) 

Natural gas

  Ps.    78,644.1    Ps.  105,436.3    Ps.    58,102.1    Ps.    67,141.3    Ps.    64,468.8    (4.0 Ps.58,102.1   Ps.67,141.3   Ps.64,466.3   Ps.50,233.0   Ps. 68,128.7    35.6  

Liquefied petroleum gas

  54,456.5    55,972.1    49,461.3    53,385.9    57,981.0    8.6    49,461.3    53,385.9    57,981.0    64,966.5    71,728.9    10.4  

Petrochemicals

            

Hexane

  344.8    484.6    367.5    278.5    408.2    46.6    367.5    278.5    408.2    4.8    44.3    822.9  

Dissolving agents

  81.6    140.9    18.2    56.0    29.2    (47.9

Ethane(3)

                  32.3      

Solvent agents

  18.2    56.0    29.2    85.7    28.0    (67.3

Sulfur

  236.1    1,817.7    32.4    662.8    1,354.7    104.4    32.4    662.8    1,354.7    1,167.2    659.6    (43.5

Carbon black

  1,038.5    1,423.6    1,149.9    1,808.9    2,368.2    30.9  

Carbon black(4)

  1,149.9    1,808.9    2,368.2    1,115.7          

Pentanes

  63.1    115.2    73.6    144.4    232.0    60.7    73.6    144.4    232.0    46.9    165.8    253.5  

Heptane

  68.3    85.8    55.1    60.6    105.7    74.4    55.1    60.6    105.7    8.6    62.7    629.1  

Butane

  141.1    168.5    119.2    188.7    240.7    27.6    119.2    188.7    240.7    264.9    259.1    (2.2

Propane

  60.5    78.7    49.3    74.2    93.5    26.0    49.3    74.2    93.5    69.6    70.3    1.0  

Others

  3.4        0.2                0.2                4.4      
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total Petrochemicals

  2,037.4    4,315.0    1,865.3    3,274.1    4,832.2    47.6    1,865.3    3,274.2    4,832.2    2,763.4    1,326.5    (52.0
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total

  Ps.  135,137.9    Ps.  165,723.4    Ps.  109,428.7    Ps.  123,801.3    Ps.  127,282.1    2.8   Ps. 109,428.7   Ps. 123,801.4   Ps. 127,279.6   Ps. 117,962.8   Ps. 141,184.1    19.7  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Excludes value added tax.
(2)Figures for 2007 are stated in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. Figures for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 are stated in nominal pesos.
(3)Ethane sales to Petroquímica Mexicana de Vinilo, S.A. de C.V., (which we refer to as PMV) began in October 2013. See “—Business Overview—Petrochemicals—Joint Venture with Mexichem” in this Item 4.
(4)Since May 2012, carbon black is sold by Pemex-Refining.

Source:Pemex BDI.

The volume of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ domestic sales for the five-year period ended December 31, 2013 was distributed as follows:

Volume of Domestic Sales of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

   Year ended December 31,   2013
vs. 2012
 
       2009           2010           2011           2012           2013       
   (in thousands of barrels per day, except where otherwise indicated)   (%) 

Natural gas(1)

   3,118.8     3,254.9     3,382.7     3,387.7     3,463.5     2.2  

Liquefied petroleum gas(2)

   281.0     287.9     284.8     285.5     282.8     (0.9

Petrochemicals(3)

            

Hexane

   33.6     23.0     29.3     0.3     2.9     866.7  

Ethane(4)

                       16.7       

Solvent agents

   5.1     5.7     2.7     7.2     2.1     70.8  

Sulfur

   593.3     582.1     647.8     649.1     520.7     (19.8

Carbon black(5)

   330.7     419.1     429.6     167.1            

Pentanes

   10.7     15.0     19.1     3.9     14.6     274.4  

Heptane

   4.9     4.9     7.1     0.5     3.9     680.0  

Butane

   17.2     19.7     20.6     23.0     26.4     14.8  

Propane

   7.7     8.6     8.7     8.2     9.3     13.4  

Others

                       0.4       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total petrochemicals

   1,003.2     1,078.1     1,164.9     859.2     597.0     (30.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)In millions of cubic feet per day.
(2)In thousands of barrels per day.
(3)In thousands of tons.
(4)Ethane sales to PMV began in October 2013. See “—Business Overview—Petrochemicals—Joint Venture with Mexichem” in this Item 4.
(5)Since May 2012, carbon black is sold by Pemex-Refining.

Source:Pemex BDI.

The value of the domestic sales of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals increased by 19.7%, or Ps. 23,221.3 million, as compared to 2012, primarily as a result of a 35.6% increase in domestic sales of natural gas and a 10.4% increase in domestic sales of LPG, each due to price increases. This increase was partially offset by a 52.0% decrease in total petrochemicals sales of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, primarily as a result of a decrease in the volume and prices of certain products sold, including sulfur, in addition to carbon black being sold by Pemex-Refining since May 2012.

Subsidiaries of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals conducts certain management, real estate and distribution activities through its subsidiaries and through certain joint ventures. The following table lists Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ subsidiaries, their principal operating activities and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ ownership interest as of December 31, 2011.2013.

Subsidiaries of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals(1)

 

Subsidiary

  

Principal Activity

  Ownership
Interest (%)
 

Mex Gas International, Ltd.(2)

  Holding company   100.00  

Pasco International, Ltd.

  Holding company   100.00  

Pasco Terminals, Inc.(3)

  Storage and distribution of liquid sulfur   100.00  

Pan American Sulphur, Ltd.(4)

  

Storage and handling of petroleum, petrochemical and chemical products through the loading/unloading of vessels and delivering/receiving of products by pipeline or truck

   100.00  

Terrenos para Industrias, S.A.

  Real estate holding company   100.00  

 

(1)As of December 31, 2011.2013.
(2)Mex Gas International, Ltd. is the only subsidiary of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals that is a consolidated subsidiary company. See Note 3(b)3(a) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(3)Pasco Terminals, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary company of Pasco International, Ltd.
(4)During 2011,2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals continued with the process to liquidate this entity. In April 2013, Pan American Sulphur, Ltd. (Pasco UK) contributed U.S. $3,088,800 to Pasco International, Ltd., a subsidiary of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, in exchange for 6,600 shares of Pasco International Ltd. Pasco International, Ltd. subsequently paid dividends in kind to Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals in the form of these 6,600 shares. On May 1, 2013, the members of Pasco UK’s board of directors completed the liquidation process through a Members’ Voluntary Liquidation. This liquidation event triggered the 12-month period during which creditors may claim the amount of this entity with the engagement of Deloitte LLP and Addleshaw Goddard,debt owed to oversee the process of voluntary liquidationthem.

Source: Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

The following table lists Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ joint ventures, their principal operating activities and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ ownership interest as of December 31, 2011.2013.

Joint Ventures of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals(1)

 

Subsidiary

  

Principal Activity

  Ownership
Interest (%)
 

Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.VC.V.

  Transportation of gasGas transportation   50.00  

CH4 Energía, S.A. de C.V.

  Trading of gasGas trading   50.00  

 

(1)As of December 31, 2011.2013.

Source: Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Pipelines

Private Sector Participation in Natural Gas Distribution

. The Regulatory Law provides that private and “social sector” companies may, with governmental authorization, store, distribute and transport natural gas, and may construct, own and operate natural gas pipelines, facilities and equipment.

Since 1997, the Regulatory Law has required us to provide the private sector with open access to our transportation system for distribution, ending our prior exclusive rights over the distribution lines. We continue to market natural gas and may develop natural gas storage systems.

In 1996, theComisión Reguladora de Energía(Energy Regulatory Commission)Commission approved the Gradual Access Program for 1996-1997, which required that we open access to our natural gas distribution system to the private sector and prohibited vertical integration between transportation and distribution. As a result, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ distribution assets located within the following official distribution zones have been privatized: Chihuahua, Toluca, Saltillo, Nuevo Laredo, Río Pánuco, Norte deNorthern Tamaulipas, Distrito Federal, Valle de Cuautitlán, Texcoco, Hidalgo,n-Texcoco-Hidalgo, Hermosillo, Monterrey, Mexicali, El Bajío, Cananea, Querétaro, La Laguna, Bajío Norte, Puebla, Tlaxcala,

Guadalajara, Piedras Negras and Ciudad Juárez. As of 1999, all of our natural gas distribution pipelines were opened to private sector useMost recently, Pemex-Gas and there were no furtherBasic Petrochemicals’ distribution assets left to divest pursuant to the program, although a portion of these assets are still heldlocated within Altamira and Morelos were privatized in trust2012 and the distribution assets located within Veracruz have not yet been divested.were privatized in 2013.

In addition, with respect to first-hand sales of natural gas, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals in coordination withsubmitted to the Energy Regulatory Commission has informed customers of the advantages of moving from the current transitoryits proposal for a new payment system, (which is based on the volume of natural gas transported to each customer, but does not allow the customer to reserve transportation capacity) to a new permanent payment system that provideswhich would provide customers with the option to reserve transportation capacity of natural gas and make payments based on the volume consumed. This new payment system willwould allow customers to better estimate their consumption of natural gas, as well as enhance PEMEX’sour ability to manage costs and capacity related to the transportation of natural gas. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals is prepared to operate under the new system; however, as of the date of this report,system once the Energy Regulatory Commission has not declared it effectiveapproves the new system and onlyissues final regulations to govern natural gas sales under it.

Los Ramones Gas Pipeline. On January 16, 2013, the Federal Electricity Commission, independent power producers and customers with self-generated electric power have expressed interest in movingBoard of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos was informed of modifications to the new system. With regardLos Ramones pipeline project, which is part of a strategy to first-hand salessupply central Mexico with natural gas imported from the United States. The Los Ramones pipeline project will be implemented in two phases. Phase one consists of natural gas,the construction of a pipeline from the U.S. border near Ciudad Camargo, Tamaulipas to Los Ramones, Nuevo León, which will be developed and owned by Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V., a joint venture between Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and Sempra Gasoductos Holding, S. de R.L. de C.V. The phase one pipeline is expected to begin operating in conjunctionDecember 2014 with an initial capacity of 1.0 billion cubic feet per day and will have its capacity increased to 2.1 billion cubic feet per day by late 2015. Phase one will require an estimated U.S. $688 million investment. Phase two of the project consists of a pipeline from Los Ramones, Nuevo León, to Apaseo el Alto, Guanajuato, which is expected to begin operating in December 2015 with a capacity of 1.43 billion cubic feet per day. On October 15, 2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals voided the tender process for the construction of the second phase of the project, after the bid received from the consortium formed by Enagás and GDF Suez was rejected due to its failure to meet the project’s technical and economic requirements. Phase two of the project has since been subdivided into two stages, Ramones Norte and Ramones Sur, and was directly awarded to the selected contractors based on their experience with projects of this nature. Ramones Norte, which consists of a 447 kilometer portion of the pipeline from Los Ramones to San Luis Potosí, will require an estimated U.S. $1,052 million investment and will be constructed by a joint venture between TAG Pipelines, S. de R.L. de C.V. (an indirect subsidiary of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals) and Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V. (or any of its subsidiaries). Ramones Sur consists of a 291 kilometer portion of the pipeline from San Luis Potosí to Apaseo el Alto, Guanajuato, will require an estimated U.S. $795 million investment and will be constructed by a joint venture between GDF Suez and TAG Pipelines.

Energy Reform. The Energy Reform Decree contemplates the transfer of certain of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ assets related to the national gas pipeline system to another decentralized public entity of the Mexican Government that will be created in the future. The secondary legislation implementing the Energy Regulatory Commission,Reform Decree is reviewingexpected to include, among other things, additional details regarding this transfer of assets. See “—Information on the rules that will govern gas sales under the new permanent payment system described above.Company—History and Development—Energy Reform” in this Item 4.

Pricing Decrees

Natural gas prices for domestic sale are calculated in accordance with directives issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission on July 20, 2009 and the related Resolutions of December 20, 2010, March 3, 2011, December 20, 2012, January 17, 2013 and March 3, 2011.21, 2013. These prices reflect natural gas opportunity costs and competitive conditions in international markets and at the point of sale.

Since 2003, price control mechanisms for LPG have been implemented through governmental decrees. On December 28, 2007, President Calderónthe Mexican Government issued a decree establishing the maximum LPG price for first-hand and end-user sales. The decree became effective in January 2008, and established a monthly price increase from January 2008 to May 2008 of Ps. 0.0317 per kilogram over the weighted average end-user price of LPG after taxes. From June 2008 to December 2008, the amount of these price increases varied from month to month.

On December 29, 2008, the Mexican Government issued a decree establishing a national weighted average end-user price of LPG before taxes of Ps. 8.92 per kilogram, effective January 2009. Subsequently, on January 9, 2009, the Mexican Government issued a decree modifying the national weighted average end-user price of LPG before taxes to Ps. 8.03 per kilogram, representing a discount of almost 10%. This decree also suspended the periodic increases in the retail price of LPG, beginning on January 12, 2009 and effective through December 31, 2009.

In January 2010, the Mexican Government issued a decree establishing the maximum weighted average end-user price of LPG before taxes of Ps. 8.08 per kilogram. Subsequently, as of February 2010, the Mexican Government established monthly maximum price increases in cents per kilogram before taxes, as follows:

 

Period

  Mexican Cents per Kilogram 

February 2010 to July 2011

   5  

August to November 2011

   7  

December 2011

   8  

January 2012 to April 2012October 2013

   7  

November to December 2013.

9

January to April 30, 2014

9

*On January 1, 2014, pursuant to the IEPS Tax on Fossil Fuels, a one-time price increase of 12 Mexican cents per kilogram went into effect in addition to the monthly price increase of nine Mexican cents per kilogram.

The Mexican Government could modify these price controls or impose additional price controls in the future. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to theOur Relationship between PEMEX andwith the Mexican Government—The Mexican Government has imposed price controls in the domestic market on PEMEX’sour products.”

Natural Gas Hedging Operations

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals offers, as a value added service, various hedging contracts to its domestic customers to protect them against fluctuations in the prices of natural gas. For information on hedging contracts offered to natural gas domestic customers, see “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Instruments Entered into for Trading Purposes.”

Investments

In nominal peso terms, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals invested Ps. 3,0195,405 million in 2011,2013, as compared to Ps. 3,8874,468 million in 2010,2012, in projects primarily related to natural gas and condensates processing, as well as for the transportation and storage.storage of other products. For 2012,2014, the Mexican Government has approved Ps. 6,1267,548 million in nominal terms of capital expenditures for Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, including Ps. 6011,536 million forto recondition the cryogenic plant atinfrastructure used to supply ethane to the Poza Rica GPC.Etileno XXI project and the remaining Ps. 6,012 million to ensure the safe and reliable operation of its facilities.

Cryogenic Plant at the Poza Rica GPC

In orderDuring 2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals completed the construction of a new cryogenic plant at the Poza Rica GPC, which was built to provide the infrastructure necessary to process the wet natural gas produced by the Aceite Terciario del Golfo project, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals is constructing aATG project. The new cryogenic plant at the Poza Rica GPC, which will havehas a processing capacity of 200 million cubic feet per day of sweet wet gas and a liquids fractionating plant, which will be located on Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ property and will utilize the facilities of the Poza Rica GPC.per day. This project also includes,included, among others,other things, the construction of two storage tanks for liquid gas, each with a capacity of 20 thousand barrels, an ecological burner, an effluent treatment plant and supporting infrastructure. The tender for this project was awarded on May 15, 2009 to ICA Flúor Daniel and Linde Process Plants, Inc., in association, withDuring 2013, operations at the contract signed on June 12, 2009. Construction began on August 17, 2009, and the project is scheduled to be completed in June 2012 and commence operations the following month. The project has been modified to reflect the 2012 planning cycle and the revised projections of the natural gas supply expected to be produced from the Aceite Terciario del Golfo project.new cryogenic plant were normal.

Electric Energy Cogeneration Program

As part of ourPrograma de Cogeneración de Energía Eléctrica (Electric Energy Cogeneration Program), we launched an international tender for the construction of our first large-scale cogeneration plant at the Nuevo Pemex GPC in the state of Tabasco on August 28, 2008. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals will be able to use the electric energyThis plant began operating on April 1, 2013. Power generated by the plant atis supplied to the Nuevo Pemex GPC and may use any surplus electric energy production in other PEMEXPetróleos Mexicanos facilities.

The Electric Energy Cogeneration Program is a two-stage program. In the short term, the program is intended to permit us to reduce our reliance on energy supplied by the Federal Electricity Commission. Over the medium and long term, we expect that this large-scale cogeneration project will permit us to replace inefficient equipment at the end of its useful life and to sell excess energy production to the Federal Electricity Commission. See “Item 4—“—Information on the Company—History and Development.”Development” in this Item 4.

Collaboration Agreements

On August 24, 2011,March 15, 2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and the state of SonoraZacatecas signed a collaboration agreement to develop a pipeline to deliver natural gas to that state. On October 26, 2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, Compañía Cervecera de Zacatecas, S.A. de C.V. (part of Grupo Modelo) and Gas Natural Industrial de Colombia S.A. E.S.P., signed an agreement to transport compressed natural gas by tank cars,develop this pipeline, which will be 12 inches in order to supplydiameter and 172 kilometers long. During the industries and local businesses located far away fromfirst stage of this project, the pipeline network. This agreement is expected to reduce costshave a transportation capacity of 20 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. Following the construction of a new compression station during the second stage, the pipeline’s transportation capacity is expected to increase to 40 million cubic feet per day. In December 2013, the Energy Regulatory Commission authorized Transportadora de Gas Natural de Zacatecas, S.A. de C.V., the company created by Gas Natural Industrial de Colombia S.A. E.S.P. to carry out this project, to transport natural gas. As of the date of this report, the pipeline remains under construction and emissionsis expected to begin operating in June 2014. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals will be capable of pollutants,supplying natural gas to customers who require it until the pipeline is completed.

On April 19, 2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and the state of San Luis Potosi signed a collaboration agreement to define and develop an infrastructure development plan concerning the supply of natural gas. During 2013, this agreement enabled us to obtain rights of way in the state, thereby facilitating the second phase of the Los Ramones pipeline project. See “—Business Overview—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Los Ramones Gas Pipeline” in this Item 4.

Ethane Supply Contract

On February 19, 2010, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals entered into a contract to supply 66,000 barrels of ethane per day to the Etileno XXI project, a petrochemical complex in Nanchital, Veracruz that will produce ethylene and polyethylene. The Etileno XXI project is being developed and will be owned and operated by replacingBraskem-IDESA, a Brazilian-Mexican consortium. In order to meet its obligations under this contract, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals made adjustments to the more expensiveinfrastructure of its processing plants in the Ciudad Pemex, Nuevo Pemex and higher polluting fuels used by industriesCactus GPCs. Additional ethane will be transported from the GPCs located at Tabasco, in southeastern Mexico, to Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz. This contract provides for “take or pay—delivery or pay” obligations for the parties, and business locatedthus, in case of breach of its supply obligation, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals is subject to the payment of liquidated damages. In the event of termination as a consequence of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ material default under the ethane supply contract, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals may be obligated to pay to the other parties involved in the project an amount equal to the termination value of this project (the value of which is determined pursuant to the contract and takes into consideration, among other factors, the outstanding debt of the project and the amount invested in the project at such areas.time).

Petrochemicals

Capacity

At the end of 2011,2013, Pemex-Petrochemicals owned seveneight petrochemical complexes and one petrochemical unit for the production of non-basic petrochemical products. Pemex-Petrochemicals had a total installed capacity of 10,27610,186 thousand tons of petrochemical products per year in 2011.2013.

Pemex-Petrochemicals’ total production capacity for the last five years was distributed among its facilities as set forth below.

Pemex-Petrochemicals’ Total Capacity

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
Petrochemical Facility  2007   2008   2009   2010(1)   2011   2009   2010(1)   2011   2012   2013(2) 
  (in thousands of tons)   (in thousands of tons) 

Cosoleacaque

   4,975     4,975     4,975     2,150     2,150     4,975     2,150     2,150     2,150     3,225  

Cangrejera

   3,280     4,214     4,137     4,438     4,328     4,137     4,438     4,328     4,328     3,964  

Morelos

   2,263     2,575     2,575     2,261     2,286     2,575     2,261     2,286     2,286     2,263  

Pajaritos

   1,021     1,244     1,244     1,758     1,180     1,244     1,758     1,180     1,180     547(3) 

Escolín(4)

   337     337     337     55     55     337     55     55     55       

San Martín Texmelucan

   288     286     286     222     222  

Independencia

   286     222     222     222     187  

Camargo(4)

   333     333     333               333                      

Tula

   76     68     68     55     55     68     55     55     55       
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   12,571     14,034     13,955     10,939     10,276     13,955     10,939     10,276     10,276     10,186  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Beginning in 2010, total capacity includes capacity from those plants available for operation, while in previous years it included capacity from plants that were not in operation and had a stand-by status.
(2)As of 2013, Pemex-Petrochemicals’ capacity does not include subproducts for our own consumption.
(3)As of September 12, 2013, the vinyl chloride and ethylene plants at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex were divested from Pemex-Petrochemicals to form a joint venture with PMV.
(4)As of 2013, the Escolín and Camargo petrochemical complexes’ capacities are no longer included because these complexes have been out of operation for more than three years.

Source:Pemex BDI.Petrochemicals.

Production

Pemex-Petrochemicals manufactures various non-basic petrochemical products, including:

 

methane derivatives, such as ammonia and methanol;

 

ethane derivatives, such as ethylene, polyethylene, vinyl chloride monomer, ethylene oxide and glycols;

 

aromatics and their derivatives, such as high octane hydrocarbon, paraxylene, styrene, benzene, toluene and xylenes;

 

propylene chain and its derivatives, such as acrylonitrile and propylene;

 

other products, such as oxygen, nitrogen, hexane, heptane, pyrolysis liquids, specialty petrochemical products, hydrochloric acid and muriatic acid; and

 

��

petroleum derivatives chain, such as octane base gasoline, amorphous gasoline, naphtha gas and heavy naphtha.

petroleum derivatives chain, such as octane base gasoline, amorphous gasoline, naphtha gas and heavy naphtha.

The total annual production of Pemex-Petrochemicals in 20112013 was 8,1557,339 thousand tons. Our combined total annual petrochemical production (including all subsidiaries) decreasedincreased by 6.1%7.3% in 2011,2013, from 13,18810,693 thousand

tons in 2012 to 11,470 thousand tons in 2010 to 12,384 thousand tons in 2011.2013. Of this amount, Pemex-Petrochemicals produced 8,1557,339 thousand tons, representing an 8.8% decreasea 15.3% increase from Pemex-Petrochemicals’ production of 8,9436,367 thousand tons of

petrochemical products in 2010.2012. The remainder of these petrochemical products was produced byPemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals. The decreaseincrease in petrochemical production was mainly a resultdue to the incorporation of the business decision to reducenew continuous catalytic regeneration reactor in the plant at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex, which increased output and restored the production volume of gasoline components and gasoline blends in orderpetroleum aromatics as compared to improve2012, when the economic performancearomatics train was out of that line of business. In addition, maintenanceoperations for eight months to allow for the installation of the ethylene plant in the Morelos petrochemical complex was undertaken in 2011, which did not take place in the previous year.new reactor.

For information on Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ petrochemical production, see “—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals” above.

The following table summarizes the annual production associated with the principal petrochemical activities of Pemex-Petrochemicals for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Pemex-Petrochemicals Production

 

  Year ended December 31,   2011
vs.  2010
   Year ended December 31,   2013
vs.
2012
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
  (in thousands of tons per year)   (%)   (in thousands of tons per year)   (%) 

Liquids

                        

Hexanes

   56     54     46     51     45     (11.8   46     51     45     5     22     340.0  

Heptanes

   13     23     20     20     19     (5.0   20     20     19     3     8     166.7  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   69     77     66     71     64     (9.9   65     71     64     8     30     275.0  

Other inputs

                        

Oxygen

   410     455     445     460     447     (2.8   445     460     447     418     434     3.8  

Nitrogen

   106     135     149     167     165     (1.2   149     167     165     164     172     4.9  

Hydrogen

   161     148     110     159     128     (19.5   110     159     128     20     61     205.0  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   677     738     704     786     740     (5.9   703     786     740     602     667     10.8  

Petrochemicals

                        

Methane derivatives

   1,859     2,202     1,962     2,282     2,306     1.1     1,962     2,282     2,306     2,473     2,460     (0.5

Ethane derivatives

   2,607     2,604     2,695     2,831     2,750     (2.9   2,695     2,831     2,750     2,775     2,473     (10.9

Aromatics and derivatives(1)

   1,338     1,354     1,233     1,042     923     (11.4   1,233     1,042     923     166     799     381.3  

Propylene and derivatives

   47     17     31     84     62     (26.2   31     84     62     49     52     6.1  

Petroleum derivatives(1)

                  610     451     (26.1        610     451     26     321     1,134.6  

Others(1)

   708     707     767     1,094     744     (32.0   768     1,093     744     115     443     285.2  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   6,559     6,884     6,688     7,943     7,236     (8.9   6,689     7,943     7,237     5,604     6,549     16.9  

Other products

                        

Hydrochloric acid

   141     93     92     109     98     (10.1   92     109     98     108     63     (41.7

Muriatic acid

   50     49     37     34     16     (52.9   37     34     16     45     30     (33.3
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   191     142     129     144     114     (20.8   129     144     114     153     93     (39.2
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Subtotal

   7,496     7,841     7,587     8,943     8,155     (8.8   7,587     8,943     8,155     6,367     7,339     15.3  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Refined products(2)

   5,068     5,323     3,899                 

Refined products(2)

   3,899                           
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total(3)

   12,565     13,164     11,486     8,943     8,155     (8.8   11,486     8,943     8,155     6,367     7,339     15.3  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

Notes:Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)

In 2010, petrochemical products were reorganized between the aromatics and derivatives chain and the “others” chain. In addition, a new chain, named petroleum derivatives, was created. In 2009, the aromatics and derivatives chain included the following products: heavy aromatics, aromina 100, benzene, styrene, ethyl benzene, fluxoil, amorphous gasoline, octane base gasoline, high octane hydrocarbon, orthoxylene, paraxylene, solcan, toluene and xylenes. However, in 2010, amorphous gasoline and octane base gasoline were moved from the aromatics and

derivatives chain to the petroleum derivatives chain, which also consisted of amorphous gasoline, octane base gasoline, naphtha gas and heavy naphtha. The latter two products had previously belonged to the “others” chain.
(2)Refined products produced at these plants consisted almost entirely of virgin stock, which is a residual by-product that results from the use of crude oil as the raw material in production in the aromatics chain. Beginning in 2010, Pemex-Petrochemicals replaced crude oil as the raw material in production of refined products with naphtha and natural gasoline, thereby eliminating virgin stock production. Accordingly, as of 2010,Pemex-Petrochemicals no longer produces any refined products.
(3)Figures include petrochemical products used as raw materials in the manufacturing of other petrochemical products.

Source: Pemex BDI.

Investments

Pemex-Petrochemicals invested Ps. 2,4264,003 million on capital expenditures in 2011,2013, which was allocated among the following ongoing projects as follows: Ps. 941495 million for the modernization and expansion of the production capacity of the aromatics train (first phase) at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex, which involves the use of new technology in the conversion of naphthas to aromatics, such as the use of a continuous catalytic regeneration reactor; Ps. 110375 million for maintaining the production capacity and expandingof the storage and distribution capacity of ammoniaethylene plant at the CosoleacaqueCangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 86288 million for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain IV at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 208 million for the modernizationexpansion and expansion of production capacitymodernization of the ethane derivatives chain I at the Morelos petrochemical complex in order to increase production of ethylene oxide from 225 thousand tons per year to 360 thousand tons per year; Ps. 78163 million for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain II at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 98 million for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives train II at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 85 million for the modernization and optimization of auxiliary services infrastructure I at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 65 million for maintaining the production capacity, storage and distribution of ammonia and the refurbishing of auxiliary services equipment at the ammonia plant V at the Cosoleacaque petrochemical complex; Ps. 64 million for maintaining the production capacity of auxiliary services infrastructure I at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex; Ps. 51 million for refurbishing facilities to improve security at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 16 million for maintaining the production capacity of the aromatics train II at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; and Ps. 2,095 million for other sustainability, safety, modernization, optimization and infrastructure projects.

Pemex-Petrochemicals’ 2014 budget includes Ps. 5,396 million in capital expenditures, of which Ps. 318 million has been allocated for the expansion and modernization of the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain I at the Morelos petrochemical complex in order to increase production of ethylene oxide from 280 thousand tons per year to 360 thousand tons per year; Ps. 131 million for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain II at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 125 million for maintaining the production capacity of the ethylene plant at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 34 million for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain IV at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 7818 million for maintaining the production capacity, storage and distribution of the ethane derivatives chain IIammonia at the MorelosCosoleacaque petrochemical complex; Ps. 5010 million for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain IIaromatics train I at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 45 million for modernization and optimization of the auxiliary services infrastructure I at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 41 million for maintaining the production capacity of the auxiliary services infrastructure I at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex; Ps. 3010 million for maintaining the production capacity of the aromatics train II at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 1 million for rehabilitation ofrefurbishing facilities for physicalto improve security at the Morelos petrochemical complex; and Ps. 9664,749 million for other sustainability, safety, modernization, optimization and infrastructure projects.

Pemex-Petrochemicals’ 2012 budget includes Ps. 4,212 million in capital expenditures, of which Ps. 728 million has been allocated for the modernization and expansion of production capacity of the aromatics train (first phase) at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex, which involves new technology in the reforming of naphthas to aromatics using a continuous catalytic regeneration reactor; Ps. 440 million has been allocated for maintaining production capacity, storage and distribution of ammonia at the Cosoleacaque petrochemical complex; Ps. 395 million has been allocated for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain IV at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 240 million has been allocated for maintaining the production capacity of ethane derivatives chain II at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 157 million has been allocated for maintaining the production capacity of the ethylene plant at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 153 million has been allocated for maintaining the production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain II at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 152 million has been allocated for rehabilitation of facilities for physical security at the Morelos petrochemical complex; Ps. 142 million has been allocated for maintaining the production capacity of the auxiliary services infrastructure I at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex; Ps. 39 million has been allocated for maintaining production capacity of the aromatics train II at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex; Ps. 30 million has been allocated for the modernization and expansion of production capacity of the ethane derivatives chain I at Morelos petrochemical complex in order to increase production of ethylene oxide from 225 thousand tons per year to 360 thousand tons per year; and Ps. 1,736 million has been allocated for other modernization, optimization and infrastructure projects.

Domestic Sales

In 2011,2013, the value of the domestic sales of Pemex-Petrochemicals increaseddecreased by 15.9%4.5%, from Ps. 24,898.327,761.0 million in 20102012 to Ps. 28,853.526,525.3 million in 2011.2013. This decrease was primarily due to the low supply of products, which resulted from: the low availability of raw materials such as natural gas and ethane; the unscheduled shutdown of the styrene plant and the linear polyethylene and high density polyethylene plant; operational problems at the vinyl chloride plant; and the divestment of the vinyl chloride and ethylene plants at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex from Pemex-Petrochemicals to form a joint venture with Mexichem in September 2013, thereby leading to lower revenues from vinyl sales. In addition, the decrease in toluene and

methanol sales that resulted from, among other factors, competition with imported products, contributed to the decrease in the value of domestic sales. While Pemex-Petrochemical’s overall production levels increased in 2013, this increase was primarily due to higherthe increased production of aromatics, petroleum derivatives and other products, which did not generate a sufficient amount of sales to offset the overall decrease in the value of Pemex-Petrochemicals’ domestic sales in 2013.

During 2013, the impact of the low supply of products was partially offset by the fact that sales prices generally remained stable as compared to the sales prices of petrochemical products and a higher volume2012, with the exception of styrene and methanolthe sales as a resultprice of greater product availability and an increase in the domestic demand for linear low density polyethylene.ammonia.

Over the five years ended December 31, 2011,2013, the value of Pemex-Petrochemicals’ domestic sales was distributed as set forth in the table below.

Value of Domestic Sales of Pemex-Petrochemicals(1)

 

  Year ended December 31,   2011
vs.  2010
   Year ended December 31,   2013
vs. 2012
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
  (in millions of pesos)(2)   (%)   (in millions of pesos)(2)   (%) 

Petrochemical Product

                        

Ethane derivatives

   Ps.  11,742.2     Ps.  14,137.8     Ps.  11,983.9     Ps.  15,899.2     Ps.  16,539.6     4.0  

Ethane and derivatives

  Ps. 11,983.9    Ps. 15,814.8    Ps. 16,539.6    Ps. 16,945.1    Ps. 15,566.0     (8.1

Aromatics and derivatives

   5,898.5     5,335.1     2,704.0     2,725.5     4,387.0     61.0     2,704.0     2,718.8     4,387.0     2,979.4     3,641.4     22.2  

Methane derivatives

   3,124.9     5,438.8     3,895.0     4,465.8     5,956.0     33.4  

Methane and derivatives

   3,895.0     4,454.9     5,956.0     6,562.6     6,059.9     (7.7

Propylene and derivatives

   346.8     386.6     400.5     1,441.3     1,467.1     1.8     400.5     1,384.4     1,467.1     1,134.8     1,212.1     6.8  

Others(3)

   311.8     525.3     345.9     366.5     503.8     37.5     345.9     365.6     503.9     139.1     45.9     (67.0
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total

   Ps.  21,424.2     Ps.  25,823.5     Ps.  19,329.3     Ps.  24,898.3     Ps.  28,853.5     15.9    Ps.19,329.3    Ps.24,738.4    Ps.28,853.7    Ps.27,761.0    Ps.26,525.3     (4.5
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Excludes value added tax.
(2)Figures as of December 31, 2007 are stated in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. Figures for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 are stated in nominal pesos.
(3)Includes naphtha gas.

Source:Pemex BDI.

Joint Venture with Mexichem

In September 2013, Pemex-Petrochemicals entered into a joint venture with Mexichem through an investment in Petroquímica Mexicana de Vinilo, S.A. de C.V., (which we refer to as PMV), a Mexican entity incorporated by Mexichem in 2011. In connection with this joint venture, we increased our investment in PPQ Cadena Productiva, S.L. by Ps. 2,993.5 million, which allowed this subsidiary company to acquire a 44.09% interest in PMV, and the ethylene and vinyl chloride monomer plants and related infrastructure at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex were divested from Pemex-Petrochemicals and contributed to PMV. This contribution, together with Mexichem’s contribution of its chlorine-caustic soda plant, allowed for the integration of the caustic soda-salt-chlorine-ethylene-vinyl chloride monomer production chain, which has streamlined operations and is expected to reduce manufacturing costs. Plants associated with this project began operating on September 12, 2013. In October 2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals began supplying ethane to PMV pursuant to a long-term supply contract approved by the Energy Regulatory Commission.

Acquisition of Fertilizer Production Facility

On January 16, 2014, our subsidiary company P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. signed an agreement through one of its subsidiaries to purchase the existing assets of Agro Nitrogenados, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of Minera del Norte, S.A. de C.V., including a closed fertilizer production facility located in Pajaritos, Veracruz, Mexico, for the purchase price of U.S. $275 million. P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. expects to renovate and, through a subsidiary, subsequently operate the production facility, which is expected to begin production in 2015 and to have an annual production capacity of up to 990,000 tons of urea.

International Trading

The PMI Group

The PMI Group conducts international commercial activities for our crude oil, refined and petrochemical products, except for natural gas, which is marketed directly by Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals. The PMI Group’s main objective isobjectives are to assist in maximizing our profitability and optimizing our operations through the use of international trade, facilitating our link with the international markets and pursuing new business opportunities in marketing our products. The PMI Group manages the international sales of our crude oil and petroleum products and acquires in the international markets those petroleum products that we import to satisfy domestic demand. Sales of crude oil are carried out through PMI. Sales and purchases of petroleum products in the international markets are carried out through P.M.I. Trading, Ltd., which also performs third-party trading, transportation and risk management activities.

Exports and Imports

PMI purchases crude oil from Pemex-Exploration and Production and then sells it to PMI’s customers. PMI sold an average of 1,337.91,188.8 thousand barrels per day of crude oil in 2011,2013, which represented 52.5%47.1% of our total crude oil production.

The following tables set forth the composition and average prices of our crude oil exports for the periods indicated.

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011 
   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%) 

Crude oil exports (by volume)

                    

Olmeca (API gravity of 38°-39°)

   173     10     130     9     143     12     212     16     203     15  

Isthmus (API gravity of 32°-33°)

   41     2     23     2     14     1     75     6     99     7  

Maya (API gravity of 21°-22°)

   1,460     87     1,240     88     1,052     86     1,065     78     1,022     76  

Altamira (API gravity of 15.0°-16.5°)

   13     1     11     1     13     1     9     1     14     1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,686     100     1,403     100     1,222     100     1,361     100     1,338     100  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

Numbers may not total due to rounding.
tbpd = thousand barrels per day.
API gravity refers to the specific gravity or density of liquid petroleum products, measured in degrees on the American Petroleum Institute scale. On the API scale, oil with the lowest specific gravity has the highest API gravity. In addition, holding all other factors constant, the higher the API gravity, the greater the value of the crude oil.

Source: PMI operating statistics.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011 
  (U.S. dollars per barrel) 

Crude Oil Prices

     

Olmeca

 U.S.  $70.89   U.S.  $99.37   U.S.  $65.79   U.S.  $79.58   U.S.  $109.83  

Isthmus

  69.92    81.09    63.38    78.63    106.22  

Maya

  60.38    82.92    56.22    70.65    98.81  

Altamira

  53.71    79.69    53.50    68.80    96.63  

Weighted average realized price

 U.S.  $61.64   U.S.  $84.38   U.S.  $57.42   U.S.  $72.46   U.S.  $101.01  
   Year ended December 31, 
   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 
   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%) 

Crude oil exports (by volume)

                    

Olmeca (API gravity of 38°-39°)

   143     12     212     16     203     15     194     15     99     8  

Isthmus (API gravity of 32°-33°)

   14     1     75     6     99     7     99     8     103     9  

Maya (API gravity of 21°-22°)

   1,052     86     1,065     78     1,022     76     944     75     968     81  

Altamira (API gravity of15.0°-16.5°)

   13     1     9     1     14     1     19     2     20     2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,222     100     1,361     100     1,338     100     1,256     100     1,189     100  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Notes: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

tbpd = thousand barrels per day.

API gravity refers to the specific gravity or density of liquid petroleum products, measured in degrees on the American Petroleum Institute (API) scale. On the API scale, oil with the lowest specific gravity has the highest API gravity. In addition, holding all other factors constant, the higher the API gravity, the greater the value of the crude oil.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of February 15, 2012.January 10, 2014.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013 
  (U.S. dollars per barrel) 

Crude Oil Prices

     

Olmeca

 U.S. $65.79   U.S. $79.58   U.S. $109.83   U.S. $109.38   U.S. $107.92  

Isthmus

  63.38    78.63    106.22    107.25    104.76  

Maya

  56.22    70.65    98.97    99.98    96.91  

Altamira

  53.50    68.80    96.60    96.29    94.35  

Weighted average realized price

 U.S. $57.42   U.S. $72.46   U.S. $101.13   U.S. $101.82   U.S. $98.46  

Source: PMI operating statistics as of January 10, 2014.

Geographic Distribution of Export Sales

In 2011, 81.8%2013, 72.1% of PMI’s sales of our crude oil exports were to customers located in the United States. States, which represents a 4.1% decrease as compared to 2012. The decrease in our crude oil exports to the United States can be attributed mainly to a decrease in the availability of crude oil for export due to increased crude oil processing in our own refineries. During 2013, domestic production of light crude oil in the United States steadily rose, primarily as a result of shale discoveries and advances in technology that have made extraction of oil from shale rock commercially viable. However, this increase did not materially affect our exports because the majority of our exports are classified as heavy crude oil.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, PMI had 2326 customers in 11nine countries. Among these countries, the largest proportion of our exports has consistently been to customers in the United States, Spain, India, ChinaCanada and Canada.China. During 2014, in response to the developing trends in international demand for imported crude oil, we expanded the scope of our geographic distribution. In January 2014, PMI began exporting Olmeca crude oil to European countries, other than Spain, as part of a renewed strategy to diversify and strengthen the presence of Mexican crude oil in the international market.

The following table sets forth our crude oil export sales by country for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Crude Oil Exports by Country

 

  Percentage of Exports   Percentage of Exports 
  2007 2008 2009 2010 2011   2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

United States

   80.2  81.3  86.8  83.8  81.8   86.8  83.8  81.8  76.2  72.1

Spain

   7.4    8.8    6.6    8.9    8.3     6.6    8.9    8.3    13.2    14.4  

Netherlands Antilles

   4.1    2.6              

India

   2.1    2.5    2.5    1.7    2.8     2.5    1.7    2.8    6.0    8.2  

Canada

   1.7    1.8    1.5    1.8    1.9  

China

               1.9    2.7         1.9    2.7    0.8    1.6  

Canada

   1.8    1.8    1.7    1.8    1.5  

Others

           4.4             3.1             2.4             2.0               2.8     2.4    2.0    2.8    1.9    1.9  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.00   100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of February 15, 2012.January 10, 2014.

The following table sets forth the geographic distribution of PMI’s sales of crude oil exports for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013. The table also presents the distribution of exports among PMI’s crude oil types for those years.

Composition and Geographic Distribution of Crude Oil Export Sales

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 
  (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%) 

PMI Crude Oil Export Sales to:

                                        

United States and Canada

   1,383     82     1,166     83     1,071     88     1,163     86     1,116     83     1,071     88     1,163     86     1,116     83     980     78     879     74  

Europe

   163     10     145     10     104     9     132     10     131     10     104     9     132     10     131     10     176     14     184     15  

Far East

   35     2     35     2     35     3     49     4     74     6     35     3     49     4     74     6     85     7     111     9  

Central and South America

   104     6     57     4     12     1     15     1     18     1     12     1     15     1     18     1     14     1     15     1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,686     100     1,403     100     1,222     100     1,361     100     1,338     100     1,222     100     1,361     100     1,338     100     1,256     100     1,189     100  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Olmeca (API gravity of 38°-39°)

                                        

United States and Canada

   160     9     115     8     136     11     200     15     192     14     136     11     200     15     192     14     184     15     90     8  

Others

   13     1     14     1     7     1     12     1     11     1     7     1     12     1     11     1     9     1     8     1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   173     10     130     9     143     12     212     16     203     15     143     12     212     16     203     15     194     15     99     8  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Isthmus (API gravity of 32°-33°)

                                        

United States and Canada

   16     1     12     1     8     1     53     4     80     6     8     1     53     4     80     6     58     5     62     5  

Others

   25     2     11     1     7          22     2     20     1     7          22     2     20     1     41     3     41     3  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   41     2     23     2     14     1     75     6     100     7     14     1     75     6     100     7     99     8     103     9  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Maya (API gravity of 21°-22°)

                                        

United States and Canada

   1,195     71     1,028     73     917     75     903     66     830     62     917     75     903     66     830     62     719     57     707     60  

Others

   265     16     212     15     135     11     162     12     192     14     135     11     162     12     192     14     224     18     260     22  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,460     87     1,240     88     1,052     86     1,065     78     1,022     76     1,052     86     1,065     78     1,022     76     944     75     968     81  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Altamira (API gravity of 15.0°-16.5°)

                                        

United States and Canada

   13     1     11     1     11     1     9     1     14     1     11     1     9     1     14     1     18     1     20     2  

Others

                       2                              2                              1     1            
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   13     1     11     1     13     1     9     1     14     1     13     1     9     1     14     1     19     2     20     2  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

tbpd = thousand barrels per day.

API gravity refers to the specific gravity or density of liquid petroleum products, measured in degrees on the API scale. On the API scale, oil with the lowest specific gravity has the highest API gravity. In addition, holding all other factors constant, the higher the API gravity, the greater the value of the crude oil.

Notes:

Numbers may not total due to rounding.
tbpd = thousand barrels per day.
API gravity refers to the specific gravity or density of liquid petroleum products, measured in degrees on the American Petroleum Institute scale. On the API scale, oil with the lowest specific gravity has the highest API gravity. In addition, holding all other factors constant, the higher the API gravity, the greater the value of the crude oil.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of February 15, 2012.January 10, 2014.

PMI sells a significant percentage of its crude oil under evergreen contracts, which can be terminated by either party pursuant to a three month phase-out clause. In addition, PMI enters into agreements with various international customers, including those located in the United States, Europe, India, China and Japan. PMI’s crude oil exports are sold on aFree On Board (FOB) basis.

Beginning in 1998, PMI entered into several long-term Maya crude oil supply agreements pursuant to which the purchasers agreed to undertake projects to expand the capacity of their respective refineries in order to upgrade residue from Maya crude oil. Under these agreements, PMI provided purchasers with certain support mechanisms that would protect, in certain adverse market conditions, the purchasers’ investments. In addition,

these long-term Maya crude oil supply agreements promotepromoted our strategy of increasing the export value of

Mexican heavy crude oil in relation to the value of other grades of oil by creating incentives for refiners to invest in new high-conversion refineries, which are capable of upgrading a significant proportion of the residue produced from processing Maya and Altamira crude oils.

UponThese support mechanisms ceased upon the expiration of these long-term Maya crude oil supply agreements, which occurred between July 2005 and inMarch 2009. In order to continue taking advantage of the created high-conversion capacity, the commercial relationships have continued under evergreen contracts that do not contain support mechanisms.

As of the date of this report, there are only threetwo long-term heavy crude oil supply agreements that are still in force (none of which stillcurrently has an effective support mechanism):

 

An agreement executed on May 1, 1999, among PMI, Pecten Trading Company, which is a trading subsidiary of Shell Oil Company, and P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V., to supply the Deer Park refinery joint venture with a total of approximately 200 thousand barrels per day of Maya crude oil, 50 thousand barrels of which were under the support mechanism for such agreement for a period of seven years following project completion, which occurred in April 2001. Effective May 2008, this agreement was amended to reduce the supply to approximately 170 thousand barrels per day of Maya crude oil from May 2008 (when the support mechanism ended) to March 2023 (when the agreement expires). In addition, PMI has agreed to supply additional volume depending on the availability of Maya crude oil. The additional volume is revised every two years. On January 1, 2012,Accordingly, PMI agreed to provideprovided an additional 30 thousand barrels per day of Maya crude oil and, accordingly, the total volume to be supplied from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013, is equalincreasing the total volume supplied during this period to 200 thousand barrels per day.

Effective January 2014, the total volume to be supplied has been reduced to 170 thousand barrels per day.

 

An agreement executed on December 19, 2005, with Hunt Crude Oil Supply Company, to supply its refinery in Tuscaloosa, Alabama with approximately 14 thousand barrels per day of Altamira crude oil for a period of five years following project completion, which occurred in June 2007. This agreement has been amended to extend the term until March 31, 2013.

An agreement executed on OctoberMay 1, 2008,2012, with Chevron Products Company, a division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., to supply its refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi with approximately 14595 thousand barrels per day of Maya crude oil for a period of three years, with an option to extend this agreement for an additional year subject to the express agreement of both parties. The term of this agreement will expire on April 30, 2012, and we expect to execute a new agreement shortly thereafter that will supply the refinery with 95 thousand barrels per day of Maya crude oil for a period of three years.

We expect to fulfill the majority of these supply commitments with both proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves.

In total, we exported 1.189 million barrels of crude oil per day in 2013. In 2014, we expect to export approximately 1.2 million barrels of crude oil per day.

The following table sets forth the average volume of our exports and imports of crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Volume of Exports and Imports

 

  Year ended December 31,   2011
vs.  2010
   Year ended December 31,   2013
vs. 2012
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   
  (in thousands of barrels per day, except as noted)   (%)   (in thousands of barrels per day, except as noted)   (%) 

Exports

                        

Crude Oil:

                    

Olmeca

   172.7     129.6     143.5     211.7     202.9     (4.2   143.5     211.7     202.9     193.7     98.6     (49.1

Isthmus

   41.1     23.0     14.2     74.9     99.3     32.6     14.2     74.9     99.3     99.4     102.7     3.3  

Altamira

   12.7     10.6     12.5     8.6     14.1     64.0     12.5     8.6     14.0     18.8     19.9     5.9  

Maya

   1,459.6     1,240.0     1,052.0     1,065.3     1,021.7     (4.1   1,052.0     1,065.3     1,021.6     943.7     967.6     2.5  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total crude oil

   1,686.1     1,403.4     1,222.1     1,360.5     1,337.9     (1.7   1,222.1     1,360.5     1,337.8     1,255.5     1,188.8     (5.3
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Natural gas(1)

   138.7     107.4     66.5     19.3     1.3     (93.3   66.5     19.3     1.3     0.9     3.1     244.4  

Petroleum products

   176.9     184.1     244.8     194.5     176.6     (9.2   244.8     194.5     175.9     152.6     164.5     7.8  

Petrochemical products(2)(3)

   746.0     539.6     779.4     697.6     442.9     (36.5   779.4     697.6     442.9     1,344.7     1,336.9     (0.6

Imports

                    

Natural gas:

        

Natural gas(1)

   385.6     447.1     422.0     535.8     790.8     47.6     422.0     535.8     790.8     1,089.3     1,175.4     7.9  

Liquefied natural gas(1)(4)

                       114.3       
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total natural gas

   422.0     535.8     790.8     1,089.3     1,289.7     18.4  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Petroleum products

   494.0     548.2     506.4     627.9     632.6     0.7     506.4     627.9     631.9     570.9     516.2     (9.6

Petrochemical products(2)(4)

   425.1     439.8     568.3     394.9     225.0     (43.0

Petrochemical products(2)(5)

   568.3     394.9     224.9     445.1     287.8     (35.3

 

Note:Numbers subject to adjustment because crude oil exports may be adjusted to reflect the percentage of water in each shipment.
(1)Numbers expressed in millions of cubic feet per day.
(2)Thousands of metric tons.
(3)Includes propylene.
(4)In 2013, we began importing liquefied natural gas through Manzanillo.
(5)Includes isobutane, butane and N-butane.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of February 15, 2012, and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Source:PMI operating statistics as of January 10, 2014, and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Crude oil exports decreased by 1.7%5.3% in 2011,2013, from 1,360.51,255.5 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 1,337.91,188.8 thousand barrels per day in 2011,2013, mainly due to a 1.0% decrease in crude oil production.production and a decrease in the availability of crude oil for export due to increased crude oil processing in our own refineries.

Natural gas imports increased by 47.6%18.4% in 2011,2013, from 535.81,089.3 million cubic feet per day in 20102012 to 790.81,289.7 million cubic feet per day in 2011, due to increased domestic consumption2013, which includes imports of dryliquefied natural gas whichthrough Manzanillo. The lower availability of wet gas and natural gas from Pemex-Exploration and Production’s fields made it necessary to increase natural gas imports. We exported 1.33.1 million cubic feet per day of natural gas in 2011, a decrease2013, an increase of 93.3%244.4% as compared to natural gas exports in 20102012 of 19.30.9 million cubic feet per day, mainly due to higher compression of the decrease in production in Mexico and increased domestic demand for natural gas.gas pipeline.

In 2011,2013, exports of petroleum products increased by 7.8%, from 152.6 thousand barrels per day in 2012 to 164.5 thousand barrels per day in 2013, due to increased sales of fuel oil and cutter stock. Imports of petroleum products decreased by 9.2%,9.6% in 2013, from 194.5570.9 thousand barrels per day in 20102012 to 176.6516.2 thousand barrels per day in 2011,2013, due to decreased sales of fuel oil, cutter stock and diesel. Imports of petroleum products increased by 0.7% in 2011, from 627.9 thousand barrels per day in 2010 to 632.6 thousand barrels per day in 2011, due to increased domestic demand for ultra-low sulfurregular gasoline, diesel, fuel oil and fuel oil.liquid petroleum products. As of January 2007, clean fuels specifications for gasoline and diesel for transportation were established in Mexico. Since that time, imports of ultra-low sulfur diesel and ultra-low sulfur premium gasoline have been required to meet domestic demand.

During 2012,2014, imports of petroleum products, specifically gasoline, aviation gasoline, low and ultra-low sulfur diesel and low-sulfur fuel oil, are expected to continue to decrease because the Minatitlán refinery began operating a coker unit in January 2012, which transforms residual heavy oil by-products into high-quality gasolines and

diesel. As a result, we also expect exports of most petroleum products to decrease during 2012,2014, since the coker unit will reducereduces the amount of residual products such as fuel oil available for export.

P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. sells refined and petrochemical products on anFOB,Delivered Ex-ship andCost and Freight basis and buys refined and petrochemical products on anFOB,Cost and Freight andDeliveredEx-ship orDelivery at Frontier basis.

The following table sets forth the value of exports and imports of crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products for the five years ended December 31, 2011.2013.

Value of Exports and Imports(1)

 

 Year ended December 31, 2011
vs.  2010
  Year ended December 31, 2013
vs. 2012
 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 (in millions of U.S. dollars) (%)  (in millions of U.S. dollars) (%) 

Exports

            

Olmeca

 U.S.  $4,469.1   U.S.  $4,712.2   U.S.  $3,444.8   U.S.  $6,149.2   U.S.  $8,132.6    32.3   U.S. $3,444.8   U.S. $6,149.2   U.S. $8,133.0   U.S. $7,753.7   U.S. $3,883.9    (49.9

Isthmus

  1,049.9    683.1    327.4    2,148.9    3,849.9    79.2    327.4    2,148.9    3,849.1    3,904.4    3,928.1    0.6  

Altamira

  248.7    309.2    244.3    216.3    497.0    129.8    244.3    216.3    492.7    661.6    683.7    3.3  

Maya

  32,169.9    37,637.1    21,588.9    27,471.1    36,846.0    34.1    21,588.9    27,471.1    36,904.9    34,466.5    34,227.4    (0.7
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total crude oil(2)

 U.S.  $37,937.5   U.S.  $43,341.5   U.S.  $25,605.4   U.S.  $35,985.4   U.S.  $49,325.5    37.1   U.S. $25,605.4   U.S. $35,985.4   U.S. $49,379.6   U.S. $46,786.2   U.S. $42,723.2    (8.7

Natural gas

  350.5    316.3    103.5    31.9    1.6    (95.0  103.5    31.9    1.6    0.6    2.8    366.7  

Petroleum products

  4,116.6    5,706.6    4,891.8    5,133.3    6,304.4    22.8    4,891.8    5,133.3    6,277.5    5,538.0    5,817.2    5.0  

Petrochemical products

  297.1    384.1    175.7    272.1    298.6    9.7    175.7    272.1    298.6    362.9    234.0    (35.5
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total natural gas and products

 U.S.  $4,764.2   U.S.  $6,407.0   U.S.  $5,171.0   U.S.  $5,437.3   U.S.  $6,604.6    21.5   U.S. $5,171.0   U.S. $5,437.3   U.S. $6, 577.7   U.S. $5,901.5   U.S. $6,054.0    2.6  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total exports

 U.S.  $42,701.7   U.S.  $49,748.5   U.S.  $30,776.4   U.S.  $41,422.7   U.S.  $55,930.1    35.0   U.S. $30,776.4   U.S. $41,422.7   U.S. $55,957.3   U.S. $52,687.7   U.S. $48,777.2    (7.4
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Imports

            

Natural gas

 U.S.  $995.7   U.S.  $1,423.6   U.S.  $632.8   U.S.  $939.2   U.S.  $1,272.2    35.5   U.S. $632.8   U.S. $939.2   U.S. $1,272.2   U.S. $1,216.2   U.S. $1,728.7    42.1  

Liquefied natural gas(3)

                  766.6      
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total natural gas

 U.S. $632.8   U.S. $939.2   U.S. $1,272.2   U.S. $1,216.2   U.S. $2,495.3    105.2  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Petroleum products

  15,700.0    21,882.5    12,884.9    20,317.3    28,036.5    38.0    12,884.9    20,317.3    28,019.1    27,272.4    23,916.8    (12.3

Petrochemical products

  278.9    350.5    301.4    302.5    278.1    (8.1  301.4    302.5    277.5    526.9    322.3    (38.8
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total imports

 U.S.  $16,974.6   U.S.  $23,656.6   U.S.  $13,819.0   U.S.  $21,559.0   U.S.  $29,586.8    37.2   U.S. $13,819.0   U.S. $21,559.0   U.S. $29,568.9   U.S. $29,015.4   U.S. $26,734.4    (7.9
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net exports

 U.S.  $25,727.1   U.S.  $26,091.9   U.S.  $16,957.4   U.S.  $19,863.7   U.S.  $26,343.3    32.6   U.S. $16,957.4   U.S. $19,863.7   U.S. $26,388.5   U.S. $23,672.3   U.S. $22,042.8    (6.9
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Does not include crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals purchased by P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. or P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. from third parties outside of Mexico and resold in the international markets. The figures expressed in this table differ from the amounts contained under the line item “Net Sales” in our financial statements because of differences in methodology associated with the calculation of the exchange rates and other minor adjustments.
(2)Crude oil exports are subject to adjustment to reflect the percentage of water in each shipment.
Source:(3)PMI operating statistics, as of February 15, 2012, which are based on information in bills of lading, and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.In 2013, we began importing liquefied natural gas through Manzanillo.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of January 10, 2014, which are based on information in bills of lading, and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Imports of natural gas increased in value by 35.5%105.2% during 2011,2013, mainly as a result of increased domestic consumption of drydemand for natural gas which was only partially offset by lowerand higher natural gas prices.

The following table describes the composition of our exports and imports of selected refined products in 2009, 20102011, 2012 and 2011.2013.

Exports and Imports of Selected Petroleum Products

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
  2009 2010 2011   2011 2012 2013 
  (tbpd)   (%) (tbpd)   (%) (tbpd)   (%)   (tbpd)   (%) (tbpd)   (%) (tbpd)   (%) 

Exports

                 

Gasoline(3)(1)

   71.3     29.1    67.9     34.9    74.8     42.4     74.1     42.0    76.8     50.3    71.8     43.6  

Diesel

   4.8     2.0    0.4     0.2    0.0     0.0  

Liquefied petroleum gas(2)

   1.1     0.4    0.1     0.1    1.0     0.6     1.5     0.9    0.1     0.1    0.2     0.1  

Jet fuel

   4.2     1.7    1.3     0.7    1.8     1.0     1.8     1.0    0.0     0.0    1.2     0.7  

Fuel oil

   122.3     50.0    124.0     63.8    95.6     54.1     95.6     54.2    73.2     48.0    82.9     50.3  

Others

   41.2     16.8    0.7     0.4    3.4     1.9     3.4     1.9    2.5     1.6    8.6     5.2  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

   244.8     100.0  194.5     100.0  176.6     100.0   176.4     100.0  152.6     100.0  164.7     100.0
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Imports

                 

Gasoline(1)

   327.6     64.7    414.8     66.1    430.0     68.0  

Gasoline(3)

   430.0     63.7    390.7     59.7    370.4     62.2  

Fuel oil

   38.7     7.6    12.5     2.0    25.0     4.0     25.0     3.7    41.4     6.3    34.1     5.7  

Liquefied petroleum gas(2)

   80.2     15.8    78.7     12.5    39.7     6.3     82.4     12.2    85.6     13.1    79.5     13.3  

Diesel

   47.8     9.4    106.5     17.0    136.2     21.5     135.6     20.1    133.4     20.4    108.0     18.1  

Others

   12.1     2.4    15.5     2.5    1.6     0.2     1.6     0.2    3.7     0.6    3.7     0.6  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

   506.4     100.0  627.9     100.0  632.6     100.0   674.6     100.0  654.8     100.0  595.7     100.0
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding. tbpd = thousand barrels per day.
(1)Includes gasoline and blendstock.
(2)Includes butanes.
(3)Includes methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), naphtha and pentanes.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of January 10, 2014, based on INCOTERMS (International Commercial Terms).

Exports of petroleum products increased in value by 5.0% in 2013, due to increased sales of fuel oil. In 2013, imports of petroleum products decreased both in value, by 12.3%, and in volume, by 9.6%. These decreases were due to decreased domestic demand for regular gasoline, which resulted from the national refining system’s increased production of this type of gasoline as compared to previous years. Our net imports of petroleum products for 2013 totaled U.S. $18,099.6 million, which represents a decrease from our net imports of petroleum products of U.S. $21,734.4 million in 2012.

For the three years ended December 31, 2013, our exports and imports of selected petrochemicals were as follows:

Exports and Imports of Selected Petrochemicals

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2012  2013 
   (tmt)   (%)  (tmt)   (%)  (tmt)   (%) 

Exports

          

Sulfur

   268.5     60.6    401.0     29.8    473.7     35.4  

Ammonia

   31.0     7.0    105.8     7.9    39.0     2.9  

Ethylene

   8.9     2.0    50.9     3.8    6.1     0.5  

Polyethylenes

   71.9     16.2    42.7     3.2    29.8     2.2  

Others

   62.6     14.1    744.3     55.4    788.4     59.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   442.9     100.0  1,344.7     100.0  1,336.9     100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Imports

          

Isobutane-butane-hexane-1

   106.3     47.2    228.2     51.3    199.7     69.4  

Methanol

   54.1     24.0    45.6     10.2    35.1     12.2  

Xylenes

   6.3     2.8    66.0     14.8    18.0     6.3  

Toluene

   0.0     0.0    61.5     13.8    8.4     2.9  

Propylene

   31.3     13.9    6.9     1.6    0.0     0.0  

Others

   27.0     12.0    36.8     8.3    26.6     9.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   225.0     100.0  445.1     100.0  287.8     100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

 tbpdtmt = thousand barrels per day.metric tons.

(1) Includes methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), naphtha and pentanes.
(2) Includes butanes.
(3) Includes gasoline and blendstock.

Exports include propylene. Imports include isobutane, butane and N-butane.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of February 15, 2012, based on INCOTERMS (International Commercial Terms).

Exports of petroleum products increased in value by 22.8% in 2011, in line with higher prices of these products in the international market. In 2011, imports of petroleum products increased both in value, by 38.0%, and in volume, by 0.7%. These increases were due to growing demand for ultra-low sulfur gasoline and diesel. Production from the national refining system decreased slightly with respect to previous years, leading to increased demand for imported products. Our net imports of petroleum products for 2011 totaled U.S. $21,732.1 million, a 43.1% increase from our net imports of petroleum products of U.S. $15,184.0 million in 2010.

For the three years ended December 31, 2011, our exports and imports of selected petrochemicals were as follows.

Exports and Imports of Selected Petrochemicals

   Year ended December 31, 
   2009  2010  2011 
   (tmt)   (%)  (tmt)   (%)  (tmt)   (%) 

Exports

          

Sulfur

   570.0     73.1    436.4     62.6    268.5     60.6  

Ammonia

            99.0     14.2    31.0     7.0  

Ethylene

   96.9     12.4    18.5     2.7    8.9     2.0  

Polyethylenes

   72.2     9.3    44.7     6.4    71.9     16.2  

Others

   40.3     5.2    98.9     14.2    62.6     14.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   779.4     100.0  697.6     100.0  442.9     100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Imports

          

Isobutane-butane-hexane-1

   166.6     29.3    103.9     26.3    106.3     47.2  

Methanol

   185.2     32.6    157.6     39.9    54.1     24.0  

Ammonia

   107.7     19.0    63.8     16.2    0.0     0.0  

Xylenes

   31.8     5.6    0.0     0.0    6.3     2.8  

Toluene

   42.1     7.4    0.0     0.0    0.0     0.0  

Proplylene

   0.0     0.0    39.4     10.0    31.3     13.9  

Others

   34.9     6.1    30.2     7.6    27.0     12.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   568.3     100.0  394.9     100.0  225.0     100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

Numbers may not total due to rounding.

tmt = thousand metric tons.

Exports include propylene. Imports include isobutane, butane and N-butane.

Source: PMI operating statistics as of February 15, 2012,January 10, 2014, based on INCOTERMS.

In 2011,2013, our exports of petrochemical products decreasedremained relatively constant, decreasing by 36.5%0.6%, from 697.61,344.7 thousand metric tons in 20102012 to 442.91,336.9 thousand metric tons in 2011, while2013. Our imports of petrochemical products also decreased by 43.0%35.3%, from 394.9445.1 thousand metric tons in 20102012 to 225.0287.8 thousand metric tons in 2011.2013. Petrochemical exports decreased in 20112013 due to lower sales of ethylene, ammonia and sulfur.polyethylenes. Imports of petrochemical products also decreased in 2011,2013, due to lower demand for methanoltoluene and propylene.xylenes.

Hedging Operations

P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. engages in hedging operations to cover its price exposure in the trading of petroleum products, as well as to protect the revenues of other companies within the PMI Group and to ensure the fulfillment of contractual obligations. The internal policies and procedures of P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. establish a limitlimits on the maximum capital at risk.risk and on the daily and accumulated annual loss for each business unit. Capital at risk is calculated daily in order to compare the actual figures with the aforementioned limit. Internal controls include a risk comptroller responsible for ensuring compliance, an internal auditing departmentsegregation of duties, position tracking by key personnel, regular stress testing and a risk management committee.subcommittee. See “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Hydrocarbon Price Risk.”

Transportation and Distribution

During 2013, we transported approximately 4,831 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, 287 thousand barrels of LPG per day and 3,500 thousand barrels of crude oil per day to be processed in our refining system and to satisfy domestic demand for petroleum products, as compared to 4,859 million cubic feet of natural gas per

day, 180 thousand barrels of LPG per day and 3,025 thousand barrels of crude oil per day transported in 2012. Of the total amount we transported in 2013, we carried 82% through pipelines, 9% by vessels and the remaining 9% by train tank cars as well as tank trucks.

Our pipelines connect crude oil and natural gas producing centers with refineries and petrochemical plants, and our refineries and petrochemical plants with Mexico’s major cities. At the end of 2011,2013, our pipeline network measured approximately 67,54563,636 kilometers in length. Of these pipelines, 54,19750,542 kilometers are currently operational and 13,34813,094 kilometers are out of operation. Most of the pipelinesPipelines out of operation are classified as

being in “stand-by” status, which occurs when there is a decline in production in a field where the pipeline is located or when transportation service is irregular, making operation of the pipeline unprofitable. Once production is restored in such field, we change the status of the pipelines back to “operational.” Approximately 7,9567,181 kilometers of the pipelines currently in operation transport crude oil, 8,3508,496 kilometers transport petroleum products and petrochemicals, 11,29611,152 kilometers transport natural gas, 1,8111,538 kilometers transport LPG, 2,2211,253 kilometers transport basic and secondary petrochemicals, 6,636 kilometers are crude oil and natural gas gathering pipelines, 14,81219,327 kilometers are production lines (discharge lines) and 1,1151,595 kilometers correspond to other services, including aqueducts.oil and gas pipelines. Ownership of the pipelines is distributed among the subsidiary entities according to the products they transport.

Petróleos Mexicanos has been working to implement a pipeline integrity management plan, which is based on the guidelines of American Petroleum Institute (API)API Standard 1160, “Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines,” the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B31.8S, “Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines” and theNorma Oficial de México(Official Mexican Standard)NOM-027-SESH-2010, “Integrity Management of Hydrocarbons Collection and Transportation Pipelines” (which we refer to asNOM-027).

The pipeline integrity management plan consists of the following stages:

 

collection of detailed records and the development of a pipeline database;

 

categorization and identification of threats that could affect pipeline integrity, safety and operation;

 

identification of critical points in the pipeline;

 

risk assessment and evaluation of pipeline integrity;

 

maintenance and risk-mitigation planning; and

 

ongoing monitoring during all stages.

We have made considerable progress in satisfying the requirements of NOM-027, which became effective in June 2010, concerning risk assessment and the evaluation of pipeline integrity. Specifically, as of December 31, 2011,2013, we have analyzed 60%100% of our overall pipeline network including 20%and 60% of our gathering pipelines, in length terms. In addition, we have implemented several of the measures relating to the other stages of the pipeline integrity management plan, including the data collection requirements of this standard.

As a result of the implementation of strategies focused on improving the integrity and operation of our transportation pipeline network, there was a 6% decrease in the number of leaks and spills in our pipelines arising from our day-to-day operations from 2012 to 2013. Of the 58 oil spills we experienced in transportation pipelines in 2013, 39 were due to a failure in the mechanical integrity of the pipelines, four due to third-party incidents and 15 due to other factors. During 2013, we experienced 95 oil spills in production pipelines, of which 46 were due to a failure in the mechanical integrity of the pipelines, five due to third-party incidents and 44 due to other factors. The number of spills in these pipelines decreased by 49.7% from 2012 to 2013. Petróleos Mexicanos did not experience any major oil spills that had significant environmental consequences during 2013.

The transportation of crude oil, natural gas and other products through a pipeline network is subject to various risks, including the risks of leaks and spills, explosions and theft. In 2011,2013, we incurred a total of U.S. $556.1Ps. 11,223 million in expenditures for the remediation and maintenance of our pipeline network and we have budgeted an additional U.S. $634.8

Ps. 9,502 million for these expenditures in 2012.2014. For more information on recent problems with our pipeline network, see “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to the Operations of PEMEX—PEMEX isOur Operations—We are an integrated oil and gas company and isare exposed to production, equipment and transportation risks, criminal acts and deliberate acts of terror” and “—Environmental Regulation—Environmental Liabilities” below.

During 2011, we transported approximately 3,385 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, 285 thousand barrels of liquefied petroleum gas per day and 3,193 thousand barrels of crude oil per day, to be processed in our refining system and to satisfy domestic demand for petroleum products, as compared to 3,255 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, 288 thousand barrels of liquefied petroleum gas per day and 3,002 thousand barrels of crude oil per day transported in 2010. Of the total amount we transported in 2011, we carried 80.4% through pipelines, 10.3% by vessels and the remainder by train tank cars as well as tank trucks.

At the end of 2011,2013, we owned five14 refined product tankers and leased another 22.five. We also owned 77 major wholesale storage and distribution centers, 1912 liquefied gas terminals, fivesix maritime terminals and tennine dock operation and maintenance facilities. These facilities, together with our pipeline network, constitute our hydrocarbon transportation and distribution infrastructure.

We are in the process of implementing a plan for the renewal and modernization of our fleet. This plan is part of a strategy to improve the efficiency of our fleet and comply with safety and environmental standards. In 2011, we spent approximately U.S. $184 million to acquire five refined product tankers. We acquired an additional refined product tanker in 2012 for approximately U.S. $38.3 million. These tankers were acquired under leases with options to purchase, and are currently in operation. During 2013, we acquired four additional refined product tankers for approximately U.S. 34.5 million each. We plan to continue to renew our fleet in accordance with the future demand for petroleum products.

Fleet Developments

On July 25, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos signed an agreement with theSecretaría de Marina- Armada de México (Mexican Navy) for the construction of 25 marine vessels for Pemex-Refining, which includes tugs, barges and shallow-draft product tankers, as part of a plan to modernize the fleet. This transaction is valued at U.S. $250 million. Pemex-Refining will provide the Mexican Navy with the technical specifications for the vessels and will supervise their construction.

On October 4, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos signed a memorandum of understanding with Keppel Offshore & Marine in order to build a shipyard in Altamira, Tamaulipas, specializing in the construction, maintenance and repair of platforms and major marine vessels. This project is expected to involve an initial investment of U.S. $150 million.

On November 26, 2013, our subsidiary company, P.M.I. Holdings B.V., signed an agreement to purchase a 51% stake in Hijos de J. Barreras, S.A., a Spanish shipyard. This transaction closed on December 16, 2013. The purpose of this acquisition is to transfer specialized shipbuilding technology to Mexico in order to continue to modernize our fleet.

PEMEX Corporate Matters

In addition to the operating activities that we undertake through the activities of our subsidiary entities and subsidiary companies, we have certain centralized corporate operations that coordinate general labor, safety, insurance and legal matters.

Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection

Petróleos Mexicanos’ Corporate Operations Office is responsible for planning, conducting and coordinating programs to:

 

foster a company culture of safety and environmental protection;

 

improve the safety of our workers and facilities;

 

reduce risks to residents of the areas surrounding our facilities; and

 

protect the environment.

We intend to develop further the industrial safety and environmental programs for each subsidiary entity. The environmental and safety division of each subsidiary entity coordinates closely with the Corporate Operations Office.

Insurance

We maintain a comprehensive property and civil liability insurance program for onshore and offshore properties and liabilities. All onshore properties, such as refineries, processing plants, pipelines and storage facilities are covered, as are all of our offshore assets, such as drilling platforms, rigs, gas gathering systems, maritime terminals and production facilities. Our insurance covers risks of sudden and accidental physical damage to or destruction of our properties, as well as against all risk of physical loss, including as a consequence of purposeful terrorist acts. This insurance also provides coverage for the contents of pipelines, storage facilities and wells, and any liabilities of PEMEXour liabilities arising from such acts. Our offshore general and civil liability insurance also covers extraordinary costs related to the operation of offshore wells, such as control and re-drilling costs, evacuation expenses and liability costs associated with spills. We also maintain protection and indemnificationindemnity insurance for our full marine fleet, as well as life insurance, automobile and heavy equipment insurance, and cargo and marine hull insurance, risk insurance for deep water drilling activities and construction risk insurance.

In accordance with Mexican law, we have entered into all of our insurance contracts with Mexican insurance carriers. These policies have limits of U.S. $2.0 billion for onshore property, U.S. $1.3 billion for offshore property, U.S. $0.3 billion for extraordinary costs related to the operation of offshore wells, U.S. $1.0 billion for protection and indemnificationindemnity for marine-related liabilities, U.S. $0.5 billion for civil liabilities, U.S. $0.5 billion for offshore terrorist acts and U.S. $0.3 billion for onshore terrorist acts. Limits of insurance policies purchased for each category of risk are determined using professional risk management assessment surveys conducted by international companies on an annual basis and the market capacity available per risk.

Since June 2003, we have not maintained business interruption insurance, which in the past compensated us for loss of revenues resulting from damages to our facilities. We have discontinued such insurance based on the following factors: (1) the existence of mitigating factors across all of our facilities, (2) the nature and operation of our facilities, such as the ability of any of our six refineries to compensate for the loss of any one refinery and the physical separation of plants within the refineries, and (3) the excess processing capacity available across our different lines of business, vis-a-vis the restricted coverage available in the international reinsurance markets. These factors led us to conclude that the benefits of this type of coverage were outweighed by the costs. Instead, we purchase ad-hoc business interruption mitigation insurance coverage, which compensates us for the additional expenses necessary to recover our production capabilities in the shortest time possible.

During 2011,2013, we continued to engage in deep water exploratory and drilling activities that were covered by our existing insurance program. In August 2012, we planpurchased a new policy to increase our deep water exploratory and drilling activities and, accordingly, we are developing a new insurance program to coverthe coverage available for potential property damage, third-party liability and control of well risks related to these activities. Under this new program,policy, we will maintain coverage for each deep water well drilled, and the limits will beare determined based on the risk profile of the corresponding well. This policy will havehas an aggregate limit of U.S. $2.35$3.2 billion, including U.S. $1.1 billion for casualty, U.S. $0.8 billion for property damage and U.S. $1.3 billion for control of well risks, which represents the maximum amount of coverage we have been able to secure in the international reinsurance markets. In addition, we currently maintain coverage of up to U.S. $500 million for third-party liability relating to all of our operations. Under the proposed program, our coverage for third-party liability relating to deep water activities would be supplemented by at least U.S. $500 million. The proposed programnew policy also contemplates additional coverage for environmental liabilities and remediation activities relating to deep water exploration and drilling. Finally, under our current contractual structures, we and our third-party service providers and contractors are responsible for any claims or losses arising from the actions

All of our or their own employees, respectively. Also, pursuant to this contractual structure, neither we nor our third-party service providers or contractors have a right of subrogation with respect to personal injury or wrongful death claims filed by or on behalf of our or their respective employees.

All PEMEX insurance policies are in turn reinsured through Kot Insurance Company, AG, which we refer to as Kot AG. Kot AG is a wholly owned subsidiary company organized under the laws of Switzerland (previously organized under the laws of Bermuda as Kot Insurance Company, Ltd.), which is used as a risk management tool to structure and distribute risks across the international reinsurance markets. The purpose of Kot AG is to reinsure policies of the local insurance carriers of Petróleos Mexicanos and maintain control over the cost and quality of the insurance covering our risks. Kot AG reinsures over 96.8%98% of its reinsurance policies with unaffiliated third partythird-party reinsurers. Kot AG carefully monitors the financial performance of its reinsurers and actively manages counterparty credit risk across its reinsurance portfolio to ensure its own financial stability and maintain its creditworthiness. Kot AG maintains solid capitalization and solvency margins consistent with guidelines provided by Swiss insurance authorities and regulations. As of December 31, 2013, Kot AG’s net risk

retention is capped at U.S. $125$140 million, of which U.S. $100 million is for property, and is diversified across different reinsurance coverages to mitigate potential aggregation factors.

Investment in Repsol

We hold a synthetic long position on 58,679,79967,969,767 shares of Repsol, S.A. (formerly known as Repsol YPF, S.A. (whichand which we refer to as Repsol). See “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Instruments Entered into for Trading Purposes”Risks Relating to the Portfolio of Third-Party Shares” for a description of this position. On July 13, 2011, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V., acquired 827,150 Repsol shares.

On August 29, 2011, we, together with P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. and Sacyr Vallehermoso S.A. (which we refer to as Sacyr), Repsol’s largest shareholder, signed a shareholder voting agreement to vote together on important decisions regarding Repsol. Pursuant to its obligations under this shareholder voting agreement, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. acquired a total of 57,204,240 shares of Repsol, which increased our share of the economic and voting rights in Repsol from 4.806% to 9.492%. We spent a total of approximately €1.2 billion on the acquisition of these Repsol shares in 2011. On December 20, 2011, we received a notice from Sacyr of its intention to terminate the shareholder voting agreement and sell certain of its Repsol shares, and on January 31, 2012, we and Sacyr mutually agreed to terminate this agreement. On February 28, 2012, we and Repsol entered into a ten-year strategic industrial alliance agreement pursuant to which we and Repsol announced our intention to collaborate on upstream and liquefied natural gas projects in the Americas, and downstream activities in the Americas, Spain and Portugal. As part of this strategic industrial alliance agreement, we agreed to lock-up and standstill restrictions that prohibit us from owning, directly or indirectly, more than 10% or less than 5% of Repsol’s shares during the term of this agreement. In calculating our indirect ownership of Repsol shares pursuant to these restrictions, we include the Repsol shares on which we hold a synthetic long position as being indirectly owned by us.

On April 16,May 7, 2012, the PresidentGovernment of the Republic of Argentina submitted to the Argentine Congressenacted a billlaw that providesprovided for the expropriation of 51% of the Class D shares of Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales S.A. (which we refer to as YPF), all of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by Repsol. On April 26, 2012,February 25, 2014, Repsol’s board of directors approved an agreement with the Argentine Senate approved this bill, which was then sent to the lower houseGovernment of the ArgentineRepublic of Argentina whereby the Republic of Argentina would pay U.S. $5 billion in the form of dollar-denominated government bonds of the Republic of Argentina as compensation for the expropriation of Repsol’s stake in Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales S.A. In order to become effective, the agreement must also be approved by Repsol’s shareholders and both chambers of the Congress of the Republic of Argentina. On March 27, 2014, the Senate of the Republic of Argentina voted in favor of the settlement agreement. On March 28, 2014, Repsol’s shareholders ratified the agreement. On April 24, 2014, the Chamber of Deputies for its approval.Pursuant to the bill, the expropriation process will be governed by Argentina’s law on expropriation (Law No. 21499) and compensation will be determined by a national appraisal tribunal. On April 17, 2012, Repsol announced that it considers the proposed expropriation of its YPF shares to be unlawful, indicated it would take all available legal measures to preserve the value of its assets and the interests of its shareholders and requested U.S. $10.5 billion in compensation from the Republic of Argentina approved the agreement, which took effect on the same date.

On June 19, 2012, Repsol approved a dividend program under which Repsol shareholders had the option to receive their pro rata portion of the dividend declared at the annual meeting in the form of either (i) new shares of Repsol or (ii) cash. On June 29, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos opted to receive its dividend in cash, which it received on July 13, 2012, while on July 9, 2012, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. received its dividend in the form of 2,600,191 new Repsol shares. As part of the same program, on January 21 and July 16, 2013, PMI Holdings, B.V. opted to receive dividends in the form of 1,683,322 and 1,506,130 new Repsol shares, respectively.

On August 9, 2013, we divested our direct interest in 9,289,968 shares of Repsol, which resulted in a net profit of Ps. 278.8 million. On the same date, we entered into an equity swap for the YPFsame number of shares that would be expropriated by the bill.with a notional amount of Ps. 2,869.9 million through which we retain economic and voting rights in such shares. See Note 13(a)(iv) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

As of December 31, 2013 we owned a total of 53,703,915 shares of Repsol. As described in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements, we have recorded the 57,204,24053,703,915 Repsol shares acquired by P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. during 2011that we hold as an “available-for-sale investment”investments in equity instruments and valued our investment in these shares,them, as of December 31, 2011,2013, at approximately U.S. $1.765 billion. The market valuePs. 17,728.5 million. As of December 31, 2012, our investment in 59,804,431 shares of Repsol shares traded onwas valued at Ps. 15,771.2 million. As described in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements, we recorded theBolsa de Madrid (Madrid Stock Exchange) has decreased approximately 37.3% since effect of the endvaluation of 2011, fromthe investment at fair value as a closing pricegain of U.S. $30.51 per share onPs. 3,098.4 million at December 30, 2011 to31, 2013 and a closing priceloss of U.S. $19.13 per share on April 26, 2012. For so long as these Repsol shares are recorded as available-for-sale,Ps. 10,125.9 million at December 31, 2012 in comprehensive income (loss) for the year in the consolidated statements of changes in their market value will be recognizedequity (deficit). In addition, we recorded dividend payments received from Repsol of Ps. 914.1 million and Ps. 685.7 million in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income at December 31, 2013 and at December 31, 2012, respectively.

Explosion at Headquarters

Our executive offices and headquarters (Centro Administrativo Pemex) are located in Mexico City. On January 31, 2013, an explosion took place at the B-2 building located at the Centro Administrativo Pemex. As a result component of the incident, 37 people died and 132 were injured. In response, we activated our equityfinancial operations contingency system, which allowed our production processes and willour response and execution capacity to continue without any irregularities. Operations at our headquarters resumed on February 6, 2013, once experts had confirmed that doing so did not affect our resultspresent any risks. Mexican Government officials determined that the explosion was caused by a buildup of operations. Asgas in the basement of the B-2 building. The root cause analysis performed by international experts recommended the implementation of ten corrective actions, six of which have been implemented as of the date of this report, with the four remaining actions to be completed once the B-2 building is fully reconstructed.

Security Strategy

In March 2014, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos authorized the formation of theSubdirección de Salvaguardia Estratégica (Deputy Direction of Strategic Safeguarding) with the goal of strengthening our security policies in order to protect our facilities, equipment and petroleum products. The new Deputy Direction of Strategic Safeguarding is expected to enhance our cooperation with various areas of the Mexican Government, while acting under the guiding principles of managerial autonomy, efficiency and productivity. Brigadier General Eduardo León Trauwitz, who formerly served as the Associate Managing Director of Physical Security Services, will head the new deputy direction, which will carry out its functions through three groups: Strategy and Security Monitoring Systems, Physical Security and Inter-Institutional Coordination of Safeguarding and Logistics.

These changes form part of a strategy aimed at effectively utilizing our technological systems and resources to combat the illicit market in fuels and to minimize the risks to our operations associated with criminal violence. See “Item 8—Legal Proceedings—Actions Against the Illicit Market in Fuels.” In connection with this strategy, we arehave invested in refurbishment projects to improve the security of our facilities at the Morelos petrochemical complex. See “—Business Overview—Petrochemicals—Investments” in this Item 4.

Collaboration and Other Agreements

In January 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos and China International United Petroleum & Chemicals Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of SINOPEC, entered into an agreement to strengthen commercial ties and enhance crude oil exports to China. Pursuant to this agreement, Petróleos Mexicanos will export 30 thousand barrels per day of crude oil to China for a period of two years.

On April 6, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos signed two memoranda of understanding and cooperation with China National Petroleum Corporation, a Chinese state-owned oil and gas company, and Xinxing Cathay International Group Co. Ltd., respectively, to establish terms for future cooperation on issues related to upstream activities, as well as technical exchanges in various areas.

On April 9, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos and Mitsui Corporation, Ltd. signed a memorandum of understanding and cooperation to discuss future collaborations in oil and gas projects, including, among others, the possibility of developing a pipeline from the U.S. to Mexico to import natural gas.

On June 4, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos signed a framework cooperation agreement with the Export-Import Bank of China to explore financing opportunities, including export credit facilities for an aggregate amount of up to U.S. $1.0 billion. Funds provided by these export credit facilities may be used to charter or acquire vessels, offshore equipment and related products of Chinese origin.

On July 3, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a non-commercial collaboration agreement with Nacional Financiera, S.N.C., one of Mexico’s development banks, to, among other things, cooperate in the processprovision by Nacional Financiera, S.N.C. of evaluatinga line of credit to Petróleos Mexicanos’ domestic suppliers.

On July 30, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a non-commercial collaboration agreement with Ecopetrol, a Colombian oil and gas company, to cooperate on technical and scientific matters relating to exploration, production, refining, petrochemicals and transportation.

On October 16, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos signed a memorandum of understanding with the impact these developments will have onExport-Import Bank of Korea intended to help finance a range of our investmentprojects through a U.S. $2.0 billion line of credit. Funds provided under this line of credit may also be used by companies that provide services to Petróleos Mexicanos.

On January 24, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a non-commercial cooperation agreement with Lukoil, a Russian oil and gas company, to exchange experience and knowledge of exploration and production activities in Repsol.order to, among other things, strengthen their respective operational and technological capabilities.

On April 10, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos signed a memorandum of understanding with TOTAL, a French company, to establish a framework for cooperation in the exchange of experience, knowledge and best practices related to upstream activities and scientific, administrative and technical matters, as well as the development of a sustainable energy sector.

On April 10, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos signed a memorandum of understanding with GDF Suez, a French company, to establish terms for technical cooperation and the exchange of knowledge and experience related to energy efficiency, water treatment and natural gas projects, among others.

Property, Plants and Equipment

General

Substantially all of our property, consisting of refineries, storage, production, manufacturing and transportation facilities and certain retail outlets, is located in Mexico, including Mexican waters in the Gulf of Mexico. The location, character, utilization and productive capacity of our exploration, drilling, refining, petrochemical production, transportation and storage facilities are described above. See “—Exploration and Production,” “—Refining,” “—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals,” “—Petrochemicals” and “—Transportation and Distribution.”

Reserves

Under Mexican law, all crude oil and other hydrocarbon reserves withinlocated in the subsoil of Mexico are owned by the Mexican nation and not by us. Pemex-ExplorationFollowing the adoption of the Energy Reform Decree, Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution provides that the Mexican Government will carry out exploration and Production hasextraction activities through agreements with private sector companies and through assignments to and agreements with us. Once the exclusivesecondary legislation related to the Energy Reform Decree is fully implemented, we and other oil and gas companies will have the right to exploit thosethe petroleum and other hydrocarbon reserves underlocated in the Petróleos Mexicanos Law and related laws and regulations.subsoil of Mexico, subject to assignment of these rights by the Ministry of Energy. Our estimates of Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves are described under “—Exploration and Production—Reserves” above.

GENERAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The Mexican Government and its ministries closely regulate and supervise our operations. TheSecretaría de Energía (Ministry Ministry of Energy)Energy monitors our activities and the Secretary of Energy acts as the chairperson of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos. The SHCP approves the annual budget and financing program of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities. The Mexican Government incorporates the annual budget and financing program of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities into its budget, which the Chamber of Deputies must approve each year. The Mexican Government is not, however, liable for the financial obligations that we incur.

Under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, Petróleos Mexicanos each year, beginning with the 2009 fiscal year provides to the SHCP, through the Ministry of Energy, its projected financial balance for each of the next five years. If Petróleos Mexicanos complies with these annual balance goals, and if its wage and salary expenditures have not increased, then the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos will be permitted to approve adjustments to its own budget and those of the subsidiary entities without approval from the SHCP. If these same conditions

are met, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos will also be permitted to authorize, without SHCP approval, increases in the expenditures of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities to the extent that their revenues exceed the amounts contemplated in the budget.

TheSecretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales(Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources), which we refer to as SEMARNAT,Resources, in conjunction with other Mexican federal and state authorities, regulates our activities that affect the environment.

In addition to the regulatory powers that the Energy Regulatory Commission already has over natural gas and LPG activities, this Commission is now vested, pursuant to the amendments to theLey de la Comisión Reguladora de Energía (Energy Regulatory Commission Law), withalso has the authority to regulate: (1) first-hand sales of gas, fuel oil and basic petrochemicals; (2) pipeline transportation and distribution of gas and refined products, as well as storage of such products to the extent that this is directly linked with such pipeline transportation and distribution, or forms an integral part of the importation and distribution terminals of such products; and (3) pipeline transportation and distribution of biofuels, as well as storage of such products to the extent that this is

directly linked with such pipeline transportation and distribution, or forms an integral part of the importation and distribution terminals of such products.

TheLey de la Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos (National Hydrocarbons Commission Law), which became effective on November 29, 2008, provides for the establishment of the NHC, which is responsible for regulating and supervising hydrocarbons exploration and exploitation as well as the processing, transportation and storage activities directly related to exploration and exploitation projects. Our estimates of Mexico’s proved reserves are reviewed by the NHC. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—“—Business Overview—Exploration and Production—Reserves.”Reserves” in this Item 4.

TheAuditoría Superior de la Federación (Superior Audit Office of the Federation, or the ASF) reviews annually theCuenta Pública(Public (Public Account) of the Mexican Government entities, including Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities. This review focuses mainly on the entities’ compliance with budgetary benchmarks and budget and accounting laws. The ASF prepares reports of its observations based on this review. The reports are subject to our analysis and, if necessary, our clarification and explanation of any issues raised during the audit. Discrepancies in amounts spent may subject our officials to legal sanctions. However, in most instances, the observed issues are explained and clarified. The financial information provided to the ASF is prepared in accordance with Mexican Governmental Standards applicable to Mexican public sector entities, which differ in several respects from Mexican FRS.IFRS. As a result, our financial statements included herein reflect different financial data than those included in the Public Account.

The transitional articles of the Energy Reform Decree contemplate the grant of additional technical and administrative authority to the Ministry of Energy, the NHC and the Energy Regulatory Commission over certain of our operations and the Mexican energy sector generally. See “—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform—Regulatory Oversight and Authority” in this Item 4 for information regarding the specific authority that is expected to be granted to these regulatory entities.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION

Legal Framework

We are subject to various laws related to the environmental protection of natural resources, as well as the management of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. In particular, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are subject to the provisions of theLey General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente(General Law on Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection), which we refer to as the Environmental Law, which was amended on January 28, 2011, and the regulations issued thereunder, theLey General de Cambio Climático (General Law on Climate Change), which was amended on June 6, 2012, and several technical environmental norms issued by the SEMARNAT. We are also subject to theLey General para la Prevención y Gestión Integral de los Residuos (General Law on Waste Prevention and Integral Management),Ley para el Aprovechamiento de Energías Renovables y el Financiamiento de la Transición Energética (Law of Use of Renewable Energy and Financing of the Energy Transition), as well as theLey para el Aprovechamiento Sustentable de la Energía (Sustainable Use of Energy Law), each of which became effective on November 29, 2008. TheSecretaría de Salud (Ministry of Health), the Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes (Ministry of Communications and Transportation), theSecretaría de Marina(Ministry of the Navy) and the Ministry of Energy assist the SEMARNAT in its functions. In addition, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are subject to the environmental laws and regulations issued by the governments of each state of Mexico where our facilities are located.

The Environmental Law and related regulations require that we obtain certain authorizations from the SEMARNAT beforeBefore we carry out any activity that may have an adverse effectimpact on the environment.environment, we are required to obtain certain authorizations from the SEMARNAT. In particular, these environmental regulations apply to chemical, petrochemical, crude oil refining and extraction activities, as well as the construction of crude oil and natural gas pipelines. Before authorizing a new project, the SEMARNAT requires the submission of an environmental impact analysis and any other information that it may request. The SEMARNAT is entitled to independently grant or deny its authorization of any activity.

The environmental regulations that apply generally to Mexican industry apply to us. These regulations specify, among other matters, the maximum permissible levels of emissions and water discharges and hazardous substances discharges as well as atmospheric pollution level limits. The technical regulations for oil and petrochemical industries set forth maximum permissible levels of pollution in residual water discharges and natural gas emissions.discharge. These regulations also establish procedures for measuring pollution levels.

Mexico generally updates and revises its environmental regulatory framework as necessary, and we participate with the Mexican Government in developing environmental regulations that are related to our activities. The Law of Use of Renewable Energy and Financing of the Energy Transition and the Sustainable Use of Energy Law are designed to further Mexico’s transition to cleaner, more environmentally friendly fuels and renewable energy sources. On January 30, 2006, the SEMARNAT issued Official Mexican Standard NOM-086-SEMARNAT-SENER-SCFI-2005, which sets forth environmental specifications for fossil fuels. As required by this standard, we are currently developing projects at our refineries to satisfy domestic market demand for low-sulfur fossil fuels.

On March 19, 2010, the Energy Regulatory Commission issued Official Mexican Standard NOM-001-SECRE-2010, which specifies quality parameters for the transportation, storage and distribution of natural gas. In order to comply with this standard, we will be requiredimplemented procedures to meet certain targets forcontrol the optimal usenitrogen concentration in the natural gas that we process and installed equipment to monitor the quality of energythe natural gas that we transport, store and distribute. In addition, the cryogenic plant at the Ciudad Pemex GPC was modified to comply with the standard, and three plants began operations in all2012 in order to control the liquid content of natural gas.

On February 2, 2012, the SEMARNAT issued Official Mexican Standard NOM-085-SEMARNAT-2011 (which we refer to as NOM-085), which sets forth environmental standards regarding the maximum levels of emissions to the atmosphere allowed from stationary sources. In April 2012, NOM-085 was amended to heighten some of these standards. In order to comply with NOM-085, we continued to reduce our processessulfur dioxide emissions and activitiesto gradually substitute fuel oil with natural gas in our operations. These efforts were carried out as well as to meet domestic market demand for low-sulfur fossil fuels.part of the reconfiguration of the refineries at Tula and Salamanca. See “—Business Overview—Refining—Vacuum Residue Processing at Miguel Hidalgo Refinery” and “—Reconfiguration of the Salamanca Refinery” in this Item 4.

In April 1997, the SEMARNAT issued regulations governing the procedures for obtaining an environmental license, under which new industrial facilities can comply with all applicable environmental requirements by way

of a single administrative procedure. Each environmental license integrates all of the different permits, licenses and authorizations related to environmental matters for a particular facility. Since these regulations went into effect, we have been required to obtain an environmental license for any new facility, while our facilities that existed prior to the effectiveness of these regulations are not subject to this obligation.

Federal and state authorities in Mexico may inspect any facility to determine compliance with the Environmental Law, local environmental laws, regulations and technical environmental regulations. Violations or non-compliance with environmental standards and regulations may result in the application of substantial fines, temporary or permanent shutdown of a facility, required capital expenditures to minimize the effect of our operations on the environment, cleanup of contaminated land and water, cancellation of a concession or revocation of authorization to carry out certain activities and, in certain cases, criminal prosecution of employees and individuals. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to the Operations of PEMEX—PEMEX’sOur Operations—Our compliance with environmental regulations in Mexico could result in material adverse effects on itsour results of operations.”

On November 28, 2007, the SEMARNAT issued NOM-148-SEMARNAT-2006 (which we refer to as NOM-148), which establishes standards for sulfur recovery in all refineries. TheAs of the date of this report, all of our refineries currentlyare in compliance with NOM-148 are located in Cadereyta, Nuevo León; Ciudad Madero, Tamaulipas; Minatitlán, Veracruz; Tula, Hidalgo; Salamanca, Guanajuato and Salina Cruz, Oaxaca. ComplianceNOM-148. During 2013, compliance with NOM-148 resulted in costs to Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities of approximately Ps. 567 million in 2009, Ps. 408 million in 2010 and Ps. 2,000 million in 2011, related to the rehabilitation, optimization and construction of new sulfur recovery plants, as well as the construction of a2,500 million. The new sulfur recovery plant at the Salamanca refinery in 2011, which will startis expected to commence operations induring 2014. Amendments to NOM-148 are anticipated by the first halfend of 2012. We do not expect2014 and are expected to spend any additional funds in 2012 in orderestablish, among other things, a sulfur emissions monitoring system applicable to maintain and bring our remaining facilities into compliance with NOM-148.refineries.

As we increase our use of new drilling technologies, it is possible that Mexico’s environmental regulations will expand to address these developments. On January 11, 2011, the NHC issued new rules and regulations relating to our deep water drilling and exploration activities in the Gulf of Mexico. These new rules and regulations, which were promulgated in response to the Deepwater Horizon blow-out and resulting oil spill in

U.S. territory in the Gulf of Mexico that began in April 2010, require us to produce a series of reports on our safety measures for deep water drilling and exploration activities over the eight months following the promulgation of the rule, and to have our procedures certified by an independent expert. We must also certify that we have adequate insurance or other financial resources available to cover any losses or compensation claims stemming from a deep water accident. As of the date of this report, we are in compliance with the above requirements for projects at depths of 500-1,500 meters and wewith all requirements applicable to deepwater projects, which are inissued primarily by the process of preparing the reports necessary to comply with such requirements for projects at depths greater than 1,500 meters.NHC. On February 20, 2012, the United States and Mexico reached an agreement regulating oil and gas development along their maritime border in the Gulf of Mexico, which has the potential tomay facilitate an expansion of deepwaterdeep water drilling for Mexico. Mexico will retain its own regulatory system.

On May 14, 2012, we procured the services of Wild Well Control Inc., a company that specializes in controlling oil spills, in order to comply with the rules and regulations issued by the NHC. Our initial agreement with Wild Well Control Inc. expired on March 31, 2013 but was subsequently renewed and is in effect as of the date of this report.

We have also recently been producing natural gas located in shale deposits from the Emergente-1 well. Although this well was initially drilled through hydraulic fracturing, we have since relied on horizontal drilling to produce natural gas. Accordingly, we have produced very little waste water. However, shale well drilling could result in environmental concerns in the future. Mexico does not currently have any environmental regulation specific to shale gas development.

Global Climate Change and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction

In May 2007, the Federal Executive Office submitted itsEstrategia Nacional de Cambio Climático (National Climate Change Strategy), which identified various opportunities to mitigate and adapt to climate change, as well as noted Mexico’s participation in the international community with respect to climate change awareness.

Since the National Climate Change Strategy was published, we have worked with the various government offices that participate in theComisión Intersecretarial de Cambio Climático(Inter-Ministry (Inter-Ministry Climate Change Commission) to develop thePrograma Especial de Cambio Climático 2009-2012(Special (Special Climate Change Program for 2009-2012, which we refer to as the PECC). We participated, with the Ministry of Energy, in the development of the portion of the PECC relating to the Energy Sector.Sector. We helped establish goals for the reduction of emissions by 2012. On August 28, 2009, SEMARNAT issued the PECC, which will allowallowed us to consolidate agreements, reinforce already negotiated commitments and identify, upon further consideration, new measures and additional changes necessary so that, progressively, Mexico’s greenhouse gas emissions levels will be reduced to acceptable levels under the National Climate Change Strategy.

We have identified several activities and projects to be undertaken in respect of issues addressed by the chapter of the PECC relating to mitigation measures, including increased energy efficiency, sour gas re-injection, co-generation and reduction in fugitive emissions, and we have set a goal of reducing our annual carbon dioxide emissions by 9.94 million tons during the period from January 1, 2009 through the end of 2012. During 2010,2011, we reduced our carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 4.84.0 million tons. During 2012, we reduced our carbon dioxide emissions further by approximately 1.8 million tons, which is a volume comparable to removing one0.3 million automobiles from circulation. During 2011, we reduced our carbon dioxide emissions further by approximately 5.0 million tons. In total, from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011,2012, we reduced annual carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 14.415.1 million tons, which represents progress of approximately 44.9%51.8% more than our goal for such annual reductions of 9.94 million tons by 2012, as compared to 2008 carbon dioxide emissions. These emission reductions were achieved primarily through reduced gas flaring in connection to exploration and production and the more efficient use of natural gas. Also addressed in this chapter of the PECC is the goal of increased adaptability by energy sector participants in responding to climate change’s effects by designing and implementing: contingency programs in case of extreme hydrometeorological events, strategies of territorial planning and ecological territorial planning, as well as a vulnerability map reflecting the potential effects of climate change.

Our largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions are heating systems and the operation of mechanical equipment, which require the burning of fossil fuels and the creation of water vapor to generate energy. During 2013, we recorded greenhouse gas emissions of 47.1 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, which represented an 8.5% increase from the 43.4 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent emitted in 2012. This increase was due to an increase in the burning of sour gas with a high nitrogen content in connection with Pemex-Exploration and Production’s operations. Despite this increase, we have continued to comply with the NHC’s rules and regulations by maintaining a level of gas usage of 98%.

As of the date of this report, the PECC for 2013 to 2018 is under development. The PECC’s greenhouse gas emissions reductions targets are expected to be based on existing greenhouse gas emissions reduction projects and will not consider possible emissions growth that may result from increases in productive activities. We are proposing a greenhouse gas emissions reductions level of approximately 5 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2018. Under the General Law on Climate Change, this goal may be updated every two years.

On June 6, 2012, the General Law on Climate Change was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, with the objectives of regulating greenhouse gas emissions and reducing the vulnerability of Mexico’s infrastructure, population and ecosystems to the adverse effects of climate change. In 2010order to comply with the requirements of the General Law on Climate Change, we will promote policies intended to reduce

greenhouse gas emissions, such as reducing gas flaring and fugitive emissions, implementing reforestation projects and substituting liquid fuels for natural gas. We will also undertake efforts to minimize the vulnerability of our operations to climate change.

In 2011, PEMEX implemented,2012 and 2013, as part of itsourPlan de Acción Climática (Climate Action Plan), which embodies our internal strategy for reducing the Mexican energy sector’s carbon footprint and minimizing the effects of climate change on our operations, we implemented several conservation and reforestation projects. These projects were designed to counteract greenhouse gas emissions and protect surrounding communities and the environment. Our principal conservation projects consistinclude:

the conservation, management and restoration of theBiósfera Usumacinta River basin’s natural ecosystems in the state of Chiapas;

an environmental education program and the operation of a water house in Pantanos de Centla (Centla Marsh Biosphere), in theCuenca Media del Grijalva-Usumacinta (Grijalva-Usumancinta Central Basin), state of Tabasco;

environmental education programs and reforestation of theCuenca del Valle protected natural areas of the Sierra de Bravo (ValleTamaulipas, Pantanos de Bravo Basin)Centla and Cañón of theHumedales Usumacinta in the state of Tabasco, and of the protected natural areas of the Cofre de Perote, Los Tuxtlas and Pico de Orizaba in the state of Veracruz;

Alvarado, Tuxpan y Tampamachoco(

a conservation project in the wetlands of Alvarado, Tuxpan, and Tampamachoco Wetlands). Our reforestation projects are located alongTampamachoco;

trainings on responding to weather-related emergencies in southern Veracruz;

and trainings on climate change and the coastal plainrestoration of mangrove habitats.

Since 2009, we have conducted studies to evaluate the risk of strategically important installations against events associated with climate change and natural phenomena, and as of the Gulfdate of Mexico and in the states of Tabasco, Tamaulipas and Veracruz, as well as in the mountain regions of federally protected natural areas in Veracruz.

PEMEX’s Internal Monitoring

We believe thatthis report, we are in substantial compliance with current federal and state environmental laws as those laws have been historically interpreted and enforced. We maintain an internal structure designed to identify and solve environmental problems and we retain external consultants to perform operational audits at our industrial plants, including cost estimates for remedying any shortfall in compliance with Mexican environmental laws. Such remedies can include improving our operating efficiency, cleaning up contaminated land and water and capital expenditures to minimize the impact of our operations on the environment. In addition, the subsidiary entities have specialized departments, depending on the size and geographic distribution of their respective sites, which implement their own environmental programs and conduct internal environmental audits and inspections of their sites and their immediate surroundings based on the standardsupdating a study of the SEMARNAT. When these internal audits reveal problems or deficiencies, the subsidiary entities take the necessary remedial actionsoil and gas sector’s vulnerability to eliminate them. If soil or bodies of water are contaminated and the remediation requirements from these internal audits and inspection are known and estimable, then we record them in our financial statements as environmental liabilities.climate change.

In addition to our internal monitoring structure for identifying environmental compliance issues, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities’ environmental program is subject to the review of theProcuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente(Office of the Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection, which we refer to as PROFEPA). PROFEPA administers the Mexican environmental regulatory framework and establishes acceptable standards of environmental remediation. Although PROFEPA has the authority to review and inspect our remediation efforts and our compliance with permitted contamination levels, it does not determine our environmental liabilities. We maintain proper records of all of the studies, estimates, performed works and any other information that PROFEPA may request from time to time.

Since 1993, we have participated in the National Program of Environmental Auditing, a voluntary environmental audit program, with PROFEPA. This program was created by PROFEPA in 1992 as a regulatory incentive for companies to correct any environmental irregularity in their operations in a voluntary manner. The voluntary environmental audit consists of three stages: (i) an audit and compliance diagnosis; (ii) the development of an action plan to correct irregularities; and (iii) the execution of the action plan. If a company completes the three stages in a satisfactory manner, PROFEPA will provide them with a clean industry certificate, which means it complies with the applicable environmental legislation for their industry. As each environmental audit is completed, we send the audit report (which includes the estimated costs for remedying any environmental anomalies) to PROFEPA for its review and approval. If the audit report is approved by PROFEPA, we review the audits and determine which findings can be resolved by changing current plant or drilling operations and implementing the current capital expenditures plan. As of December 31, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities were in the process of completing audits of 735 facilities, with the objective of obtaining “clean industry” certificates for each facility. The 2011 audits resulted in the certification of 110 facilities, of which 81 were re-certified and 29 were certified for the first time. The audits of the remaining 625 facilities have begun, but are still under review. We will continue including new facilities under this program as we expand our activities in the areas of exploration, exploitation, refining and distribution of hydrocarbons.

During 2011, we experienced 219 oil spills in pipelines. The number of such spills increased by 8% from 2010 to 2011. This was due in part to the increase in illegal tapping of the pipelines (from 49 incidents in 2010 to 85 incidents in 2011, which represents an increase of 73%), thus affecting their mechanical integrity. There were 134 spills caused by leakages during 2011, of which 111 were due to a failure in the mechanical integrity of the pipes, 15 due to acts of vandalism and 8 to other factors. However, as a result of the implementation of strategies focused on improving the integrity and operation of our pipeline network, there was a 15% decrease of the number of events in the pipeline system, from 131 in 2010 to 111 in 2011.

Petróleos Mexicanos experienced one major oil spill that had significant environmental consequences during 2011. On December 31, 2011, an oil spill of 1,500 barrels caused by an illegal tap in the 30” diameter Nuevo Teapa—Poza Rica pipeline, resulted in water contamination as well as contamination of the left riverside of the Coatzacoalcos River. The damaged pipeline was repaired and resumed operations the same day, and oil recovery activities were initiated successfully.

In addition, Petróleos Mexicanos experienced four major incidents during 2011 that did not have significant environmental consequences, as described below:

Petróleos Mexicanos and a service provider, COTEMAR, S.A. de C.V., have concluded the recovery of the semi-submersible platform Jupiter 1, which partially sunk in the Campeche Sound on April 12, 2011, south of the Gulf of Mexico. More than 2 thousand barrels of diesel and 82 barrels of jet fuel stored in this platform were recovered. In addition, the service provider subcontracted services to extract the wrecked platform and sink it to a depth of 1,000 meters, following its insurance agent recommendations. Neither production nor other activities conducted in the area were negatively affected by this incident. Subsequent monitoring confirmed that no hydrocarbons were spilled in the surrounding areas.

We controlled and extinguished a fire at the Salamanca Refinery on April 23, 2011. The fire was triggered by a leak of a solvent in one of the seals of a pump in the deparaffinization plant. There were no injuries and the fire did not affect the operations of the other plants at the refinery. The deparaffinization plant resumed operations once it was repaired on May 23, 2011.

On July 30, 2011, there was an explosion and fire at the Tula Refinery Viscosity Reduction Plant due to overpressurization in a balance tank. The explosion damaged most of the plant equipment and caused 3 casualties among the operations personnel, who were aligning the equipment during the start-up of the plant following a general maintenance outage. The fire did not affect the operations of other plants in the refinery, but gasoline production was reduced by 1.8 thousand barrels per day until the refinery made process adjustments on August 2, 2011.

On November 14, 2011, an explosion and fire took place in the 36” diameter “Estación 19—Los Ramones” gas pipeline located in the Reynosa area, in the northern region of Mexico. The explosion was caused by a gas leak due to pipeline corrosion problems. This incident did not cause any harm to personnel or to the surrounding area. There were no gas transportation problems or reductions because all the gas from that pipeline was diverted to another pipeline. The damaged pipeline will resume operations once its inspection and maintenance process is completed.

We implemented an emergency action plan in each case, in coordination with local authorities, military and civil protection services, under which the damaged areas were rapidly isolated in order to mitigate damage to local residence and properties.

In order to protect itself from environmental liabilities, Petróleos Mexicanos mantains insurance covering most of the expenses directly related to such incidents. However, this insurance does not cover fines, public relations expenses and site clean-up not directly related to the incident, among other expenses.

In an effort to create a culture focused on improving industrial safety and environmental protection, we have developed the PEMEX Safety, Health and Environmental Protection System (which we refer to as the SSPA). This system, which we began to implement in January 2006, is a management tool that focuses on the identification, evaluation and continuous application of preventive measures related to industrial safety and environmental protection. The SSPA is based on international best practices and is designed to help us achieve our goal of zero incidents, injuries, emissions of pollutants and illnesses in all of our work centers, a goal that was ratified in 2011. The specific objectives of the SSPA include: establishing a guide to determine the root causes of incidents; process safety management, with a strong emphasis on the mechanical integrity of our plants and structures; improvements in environmental protection and occupational health; rigorous application of internal safety procedures; effective audits; updated emergency response plans; effective prevention tests; and risk analysis systems.

In March 2011, the Ministry of Energy issued official guidelines that Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities must comply with regarding the implementation of the SSPA. For this reason, we introduced a program to comply with these guidelines and we took a series of actions, including implementing proactive and preventive process safety indicators based on the American Petroleum Institute’s Recommended Practice 754, which establishes process safety performance indicators for the refining and petroleum industries.

Notwithstanding our implementation of the SSPA, during 2011, our accident frequency rate increased by 29% from 2010 to 2011, from 0.42 to 0.54 injuries per million man hours worked with risk exposure. The area that contributed most to this increase was the production branch of Pemex-Refining. However, Pemex-Exploration and Production had its lowest accident frequency rate on record, 0.39, surpassing its previous goal set at 0.40. The indicator of lost days due to injuries increased by 16% from 2010 to 2011, from 25 to 29 lost days per million man hours worked with risk exposure. Lost days are those missed due to medical incapacity as a result of injuries suffered at work or those rewarded as compensation for partial, total or permanent incapacity or death. In order to address the increased accidents during 2011, we decided to undertake a second round of implementation of the SSPA. We created an enforcement program for work centers with poor performance in the SSPA, which mandates technical prevention training and consultation throughout the chain of command. In addition, beyond emphasizing the importance of strict compliance with the SSPA protocol, we have also asked all of our work centers to apply a number of new directives, including:

mandatory Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) training for all workers and enhanced professional training for critical personnel;

adoption of recommendations made by EHS professionals after visits to work centers such as refineries;

the creation of a new program to improve critical issues in EHS culture, based on the findings of a 2009 internal study; and

third-party audits.

The implementation of the SSPA has been most successful thus far for our contractors, who reported a 20.5% decrease in their accident frequency rate from 2010 to 2011, from 0.39 to 0.31 injuries per million man-hours worked with exposure to risk.

Other than as disclosed in this report, there are currently no material legal or administrative proceedings pending against us with respect to any environmental matters.

Environmental Liabilities

At December 31, 2011, our estimated and accrued environmental liabilities totaled Ps. 5,527.9 million. Of this total, Ps. 1,437.5 million was attributable to Pemex-Exploration and Production, Ps. 4,065.7 million to Pemex-Refining, Ps. 19.5 million to Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and Ps. 5.2 million to Pemex-Petrochemicals. There were no environmental liabilities at the subsidiary company level. The following tables detail our environmental liabilities by subsidiary entity and operating region at December 31, 2011.

Pemex-Exploration and Production

     
   Estimated Affected Area   Estimated Liability 
   (in hectares)   (in millions of pesos) 

Northern region

   129.27     Ps.       1,102.8  

Southern region

   60.90     98.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(1)

   190.16     Ps.       1,200.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)During 2011, environmental remediation was completed on 81.82 hectares. There were 81.91 hectares of additional affected areas in 2011, including 2.71 hectares in the Northern region and 79.20 hectares in the Southern region, as a result of spills from pipelines.

Source: PEMEX.

   Holding Ponds Drainage 
   Number of Holding Ponds
Reported as Liabilities(1)
   Estimated Liability 
       (in millions of pesos) 

Northern region

   151     Ps.            210.7  

Southern region

   13     26.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   164     Ps.             236.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total estimated environmental liabilities of Pemex-Exploration and Production

     Ps.          1,437.5  
    

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)At December 31, 2010, we reported 160 holding ponds as liabilities. In 2011, a total of 116 holding ponds were classified as new liabilities, of which 94 holding ponds were in the Northern region and 22 holding ponds were in the Souther region, while a total of 112 holding ponds were restored and the related liabilities were discharged. As a result, at December 31, 2011, 164 ponds remained to be reported as liabilities.

Source: PEMEX.

Pemex-Refining

     
   Estimated Affected Area   Estimated Liability 
   (in hectares)   (in millions of pesos) 

Pipelines

   14.15     Ps.           134.7  

Refineries

   259.53     2,198.5  

Storage and Distribution Terminals

   64.41     656.5  

Areas Affected by Recent Incidents(1)

   101.00     1,076.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(2)

   439.09     Ps.        4,065.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)These areas relate to environmental liabilities resulting from spills in facilities and pipelines that are immediately addressed through the use of a special remediation fund.
(2)During 2011, environmental remediation was completed on 7.70 hectares. Additionally, there were adjustments of 23.47 hectares and they were excluded from the environmental liabilities total for 2011 due to the completion of assessment studies. These variations affected all components of the Pemex-Refining network, with particular effects on inventories located in refineries and, to a lesser degree, in pipelines.

Source: PEMEX.

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Estimated Affected AreaEstimated Liability
(in hectares)(in millions of pesos)

Gas Complex Processors

15.15Ps.               19.5

Total

15.15Ps.               19.5

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Source: PEMEX.

Pemex-Petrochemicals

  Estimated Affected Area  Estimated Liability 
 (in hectares)  (in millions of pesos) 

Pajaritos petrochemical complex.

  1.20    Ps.                 0.7  

Cangrejera petrochemical complex

  0.07    0.4  

Pipelines

  0.34    4.2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total(1)

  1.61    Ps.                 5.2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)All of Pemex-Petrochemicals’ plants have been audited and the table above reflects the only plants determined to require environmental remediation.

Source: PEMEX.

Our estimates of environmental liabilities include cost estimates for site-specific evaluation studies, studies that draw upon aspects of previous evaluations for sites with comparable characteristics and the corresponding remediation. The remediation sites consist of sites identified in the audit process described above, as well as those previously identified sites in more mature petroleum operating areas that were not cleaned up in the past. Our environmental liabilities also include the elimination of holding ponds created by abandoned petroleum wells. Additionally, our environmental liabilities include an accrual based on information requested and received periodically from field managers regarding probable environmental liabilities identified in their respective areas of responsibility. We accrue environmental liabilities when sufficient basic knowledge is available to form a preliminary estimation as to remediation cost. Although the full potential scope of the remediation cost may not be known with certainty, these accruals are made when the liability is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable, in accordance with Bulletin C-9 “Liabilities, provisions, contingent assets and liabilities and commitments” for Mexican FRS purposes and with ASC Topic 450 “Contingencies” for U.S. GAAP purposes. These estimated liabilities include assumptions resulting from an initial evaluation of damage, including land acreage to be remediated, depth of contamination and type of contamination. While the initial evaluation is extensive, there is a possibility that the actual scope of remediation could vary depending upon information gathered during the remediation process. For a further discussion of our environmental liabilities, see Note 21 II(b) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Unasserted or additional claims are not reflected in our identified liabilities. We are not aware of any such claims that would be of such magnitude as to materially affect our estimates of environmental liabilities.

At the end of 2011, we were not aware of uncertainties with respect to joint and several liabilities that could affect our assessment of environmental contingencies or otherwise result in a major environmental liability. We are responsible for all production, processing, storage and distribution of petroleum and its derivatives in Mexico. As a result, we believe we are positioned to know immediately of any claims and are therefore directly accountable for any claims that may be brought against us.

Pemex-Exploration and Production remains responsible for handling existing environmental liabilities— these responsibilities are not part of the Integrated E&P Contracts. Nevertheless, the Integrated E&P Contracts

include environmental clauses related to contractors’ and PEP’s responsibility to ensure an adequate environmental performance, and also establish the terms for compensation and repair of any new environmental impacts.

The timing of remediation or cleanup of the sites to which these environmental liabilities relate is dependent upon the annual budget assigned to us by the Mexican Congress.

Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction

Emission Reduction Purchase Agreements

In 2000, Mexico ratified the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (which we refer to as the Kyoto Protocol) as a non-Annex B country. Accordingly, Mexico is not subject to emissionsemission caps under the Kyoto Protocol, but Mexican companies, such as PEMEX, are allowed to develop Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects. These CDM projects generate carbon dioxide emissions-reductionsemission-reduction certificates or credits that can be traded in international markets.

As of the date of this report,December 2012, we have signed three emission reduction purchase agreements for the marketing of carbon dioxide emission-reduction certificates. TwoOne of these agreements areis with Carbon Solutions de México, S.A. de C.V., another is with Statoil and the otherthird is with Statoil.Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund L.P. Under these agreements, we will sell emission reduction certificates to be generated by the following three projects, each of which should reduce our greenhouse gas emissions: increasing thermal efficiency and recovery of combustion gases at the Dos Bocas Marine Terminal; installing dry seals in gas compressors in our facilities; and undertaking a project to reduce gas flaring at the Tres Hermanos oil field.field; and the switch from fuel oil to natural gas at the Ing. Antonio Dovalí Jaime refinery at Salina Cruz, Oaxaca. The first twoDos Bocas Marine Terminal and Tres Hermanos projects are in the process of being validated, while the flaring project hashave already been registered with the United Nations.Nations, while the remaining project is in the process of being registered. These projects could potentially reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by more than 214500 thousand tons of carbon dioxide annually.

Also in 2012, we signed the Dry Seals CDM Termination Agreement as part of Mexico’s Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (which we refer to as NAMAs) program. NAMAs are a set of measurable, reportable and verifiable actions undertaken by countries to reduce emissions. NAMAs being carried out in Mexico include reducing fugitive emissions associated with the processing and transportation of natural gas, as well as mitigating the greenhouse gas emissions that result from the activities of the petroleum industry. It is estimated that this NAMA has the potential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 3 million tons per year. On October 21, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos and the SEMARNAT registered this NAMA, along with the NAMA on Cogeneration in the Mexican Oil and Gas Industry, under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

In connection with the “Bilateral Offset Credit Mechanism,” an initiative of the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trading and Industry intended to address the issue of climate change, the Japanese government has funded feasibility studies related to the co-generation projects at the Cangrejera and Morelos petrochemical complexes. These studies were completed in May 2013. As of the date of this report, we are also cooperating with the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Relations and Ministry of the Environment as part of our effort to establish a bilateral emissions reduction agreement between Mexico and Japan. This proposed agreement, known as the “Joint Crediting Mechanism,” would facilitate our implementation of emissions reduction projects through mitigation actions that will be jointly developed by the governments of each country.

We have also pursued opportunities to engage in carbon emissions trading, and have developed several studies under the framework established by agreements signed with the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank and Sumitomo Bank in order to advance these efforts. Furthermore, the United States Agency for International Development, through the consulting firm TETRATECH, has financed the implementation of a system to record and estimate the extent to which our reductions in greenhouse gas emissions can be traded.

During 2013, pursuant to agreements with the Inter-American Development Bank, the World Bank and the Fund for Energy Transition and Sustainable Use of Energy, we began developing a methodology to measure the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by boilers and furnaces in connection with an efficiency project. This project aims to develop internationally recognized measurement instruments which meet the requirements of the General Law on Climate Change for greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. If in the future this methodology enables us to sell Mexican carbon offsets in the California emissions trading market, it could be registered with state authorities in California.

PEMEX’s Internal Monitoring

We believe that we are in substantial compliance with current federal and state environmental laws as those laws have been historically interpreted and enforced. We maintain an internal structure designed to identify and solve environmental problems and we retain external consultants to perform operational audits at our industrial plants, including cost estimates for remedying any shortfall in compliance with Mexican environmental laws. Such remedies can include improving our operating efficiency, cleaning up contaminated land and water and capital expenditures to minimize the impact of our operations on the environment. In addition, the subsidiary entities have specialized departments, depending on the size and geographic distribution of their respective sites, which implement their own environmental programs and conduct internal environmental audits and inspections of their sites and their immediate surroundings based on the standards of the SEMARNAT. When these internal audits reveal problems or deficiencies, the subsidiary entities take the necessary remedial actions to eliminate them. If soil or bodies of water are contaminated and the remediation requirements from these internal audits and inspection are known and estimable, then we record them in our financial statements as environmental liabilities.

In addition to our internal monitoring structure for identifying environmental compliance issues, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities’ environmental program is subject to the review of theProcuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente (Office of the Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection, which we refer to as PROFEPA). PROFEPA administers the Mexican environmental regulatory framework and establishes acceptable standards of environmental remediation. Although PROFEPA has the authority to review and inspect our remediation efforts and our compliance with permitted contamination levels, it does not determine our environmental liabilities. We maintain proper records of all of the studies, estimates, performed works and any other information that PROFEPA may request from time to time.

Since 1993, we have participated in the National Program of Environmental Auditing, a voluntary environmental audit program, with PROFEPA. This program was created by PROFEPA in 1992 as a regulatory incentive for companies to correct any environmental irregularity in their operations in a voluntary manner. The voluntary environmental audit consists of three stages: (i) an audit and compliance diagnosis; (ii) the development of an action plan to correct irregularities; and (iii) the execution of the action plan. If a company

completes the three stages in a satisfactory manner, PROFEPA will provide them with a clean industry certificate, which means it complies with the applicable environmental legislation for their industry. As each environmental audit is completed, we send the audit report (which includes the estimated costs for remedying any environmental anomalies) to PROFEPA for its review and approval. If the audit report is approved by PROFEPA, we review the audits and determine which findings can be resolved by changing current plant or drilling operations and implementing the current capital expenditures plan. As of December 31, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities were in the process of completing audits of 627 facilities, with the objective of obtaining “clean industry” certificates for each facility. In 2012, 207 facilities were certified, while the 2013 audits resulted in the certification of 105 facilities, of which 77 were re-certified and 28 were certified for the first time. In total, 312 of our facilities have obtained “clean industry” certificates. The audits of the remaining 315 facilities have begun, but are still under review. We will continue including new facilities under this program as we expand our activities in the areas of exploration, exploitation, refining and distribution of hydrocarbons.

During 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos experienced two major incidents that had significant environmental consequences, as described below:

On August 20, 2013, a pipeline explosion and resulting ammonia gas leak occurred near Campo Nuevo in the state of Oaxaca when one of our pipelines was accidentally damaged by heavy machinery of a private company conducting road work in the area adjacent to the pipeline. Immediately following the accident, the valves were shut off and the flow of gas in the pipeline was halted. As a result of the accident, nine people died, an estimated 40 people were injured and 1,500 people were temporarily evacuated from the surrounding area.

On October 30, 2013, a gas leak occurred at the Terra 123 well in Nacajuca, Tabasco, which resulted in a well fire. The fire was immediately contained to the site of the well and no injuries were reported. The fire was deliberately allowed to burn in order to avoid the formation of a potentially dangerous gas cloud. On December 21, 2013, the fire was fully extinguished, all well control activities were completed and the oil and gas flowing from the Terra 123 well was diverted to the Sen Separation Battery.

In addition, Petróleos Mexicanos experienced one major incident during 2013 that did not have significant environmental consequences. On October 1, 2013, an explosion occurred inside the Reformation ReactorDC-501C, located at the Naphtha Reformation Plant U-501-1 of the Miguel Hidalgo Refinery. At the time of the explosion, personnel were loading the catalyst inside the reactor while plant operations were suspended. Because the atmosphere had not been made inert, hydrocarbon, carbon dust and oxygen remained inside the reactor, causing the explosion. As a result of the accident, three of our employees and two contractors’ employees were injured and an employee of one contractor died.

In order to protect itself from environmental liabilities, Petróleos Mexicanos maintains insurance covering most of the expenses directly related to such incidents. However, this insurance does not cover fines, public relations expenses and site clean-up not directly related to the incident, among other expenses.

In an effort to create a culture focused on improving industrial safety and environmental protection, we have developed the PEMEX Safety, Health and Environmental Protection System (which we refer to as the SSPA). This system, which we began to implement in January 2006, is a management tool that focuses on the identification, evaluation and continuous application of preventive measures related to industrial safety, health and environmental protection. The SSPA is based on international best practices and is designed to help us promote the continual improvement of our safety, health and environmental protection performance in order to achieve our goal of zero incidents, injuries, emissions of pollutants and illnesses in all of our operations. The specific objectives of the SSPA include: reinforce process safety management, with a strong emphasis on the mechanical integrity of our plants and facilities; upgrade the guide to determine the root causes of incidents; improve in environmental protection and occupational health; rigorous application of internal critical safety

procedures; improve and execute preventive safety observation program (known as effective audits); upgrade emergency response plans; effective prevention tests; improve and execute preventive safety risk assessment and job-task safety analysis.

In January 2011, the Ministry of Energy issued official guidelines regarding the implementation of safety systems with which Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities must comply. For this reason, we introduced a program to comply with these guidelines and we took a series of actions, including implementing reactive and preventive process safety management indicators. These indicators are based on the API’s Recommended Practice 754, which establishes process safety performance indicators for the refining and petroleum industries. During 2013, the preventive safety management indicators and reactive indicators were continuously monitored in order to develop effective safety strategies for our critical installations.

During 2013, our accident frequency rate decreased by 6.6% from 2012 to 2013, from 0.61 to 0.57 injuries per million man hours worked with risk exposure. The subsidiaries that contributed most to this decrease were Pemex-Refining, which accounted for 39% of the decrease, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, which accounted for 17% of the decrease, and Pemex-Exploration and Production, which accounted for 12% of the decrease. The indicator of lost days due to injuries remained unchanged from 2012 to 2013, at 32 lost days per million man hours worked with risk exposure. Lost days are those missed due to medical incapacity as a result of injuries suffered at work or those rewarded as compensation for partial, total or permanent incapacity or death.

In order to reduce the risk of serious accidents, we continued to direct our efforts toward the integration and operation of working groups focused on implementing an accident containment plan and a program to strengthen the efficacy of the SSPA’s risk management strategy. During 2013, the accident containment plan succeeded in decreasing the occurrence rate of serious accidents such as fatalities, amputations, fractures and burns by 30%, as compared to 2012. Additionally, in an effort to reverse the rising trend of minor and moderate accidents such as sprains, abrasions, bruises and cuts, we continued to promote our accident prevention campaigns, which specifically addressed the prevention of falls from heights and on the same level, hand safety, and lift and maneuver safety. Subsequent accident prevention campaigns will focus on working in teams, opening oil and gas lines and electrical maintenance. During the last four months of 2013, the number of falls from heights decreased by 33%, falls on the same level decreased by 20%, hand accidents decreased by 29% and accidents involving lifts and maneuvers decreased by 12%.

In addition, from 2012 to 2013, our contractors’ accident frequency rate decreased by 39.1%, from 0.46 to 0.28 injuries per million man hours worked with risk exposure.

Other than as disclosed in this report, there are currently no material legal or administrative proceedings pending against us with respect to any environmental matters.

Environmental Liabilities

At December 31, 2013, our estimated and accrued environmental liabilities totaled Ps. 5,467.0 million. Of this total, Ps. 781.7 million was attributable to Pemex-Exploration and Production, Ps. 4,085.1 million to Pemex-Refining, Ps. 596.1 million to Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and Ps. 4.2 million to Pemex-Petrochemicals. There were no environmental liabilities at the subsidiary company level. The following tables detail our environmental liabilities by subsidiary entity and operating region at December 31, 2013.

Pemex-Exploration and Production

   Estimated Affected Area   Estimated Liability 
   (in hectares)   (in millions of pesos) 

Northern region

   98.91    Ps.532.0  

Southern region

   63.44     106.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(1)

   162.35    Ps.  637.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)During 2013, environmental remediation was completed on 30.09 hectares. There were 28.82 hectares of additional affected areas in 2013, including 2.89 hectares in the Northern region and 25.93 hectares in the Southern region, as a result of spills from pipelines.

Source: PEMEX.

   Holding Ponds Drainage 
   Number of Holding Ponds
Reported as Liabilities(1)
   Estimated Liability 
       (in millions of pesos) 

Northern region

   76    Ps.126.4  

Southern region

   8     17.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   84    Ps.143.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total estimated environmental liabilities of Pemex-Exploration and Production

    Ps.  781.7  
    

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)At December 31, 2012, we reported 88 holding ponds as liabilities. In 2013, there were 4 additional holding ponds, while 8 holding ponds were restored and the related liabilities were discharged. As a result, at December 31, 2013, 84 ponds remained to be reported as liabilities.

Pemex-Refining

   Estimated Affected Area   Estimated Liability 
   (in hectares)   (in millions of pesos) 

Pipelines

   11.12    Ps.103.3  

Refineries

   259.53     2,142.6  

Storage and distribution terminals

   69.28     506.1  

Areas affected by recent incidents(1)

   123.47     1,333.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(2)

   463.40    Ps.  4,085.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)These areas relate to environmental liabilities resulting from spills in facilities and pipelines that are immediately addressed through the use of a special remediation fund.
(2)During 2013, environmental remediation was completed on 18.89 hectares, which resulted in adjustments that were excluded from the environmental liabilities total for 2013 due to the outcome of assessment studies.

Source: PEMEX.

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

   Estimated Affected Area   Estimated Liability 
  (in hectares)   (in millions of pesos) 

Gas complex processors at Reynosa

   11.50    Ps.19.5  

Texistepec Mining Unit(1)

   382.00     576.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   393.50    Ps.  596.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notes: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

n.a. = not available.

(1)Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, as jointly responsible for the remediation of environmental liabilities attributable to its subsidiary Terrenos para Industrias, S.A., has accrued an environmental liability totaling Ps. 576.6 million at December 31, 2013 in connection to the Texistepec Mining Unit.

Source: PEMEX.

Pemex-Petrochemicals

   Estimated Affected Area   Estimated Liability 
  (in hectares)   (in millions of pesos) 

Pajaritos petrochemical complex

   0.34    Ps.4.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(1)

   0.34    Ps.  4.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)All of Pemex-Petrochemicals’ plants have been audited and the table above reflects the only plant determined to require environmental remediation.

Source: PEMEX.

Our estimates of environmental liabilities include cost estimates for site-specific evaluation studies, studies that draw upon aspects of previous evaluations for sites with comparable characteristics and the corresponding remediation. The remediation sites consist of sites identified in the audit process described above, as well as those previously identified sites in more mature petroleum operating areas that were not cleaned up in the past. Our environmental liabilities also include the elimination of holding ponds created by abandoned petroleum wells. Additionally, our environmental liabilities include an accrual based on information requested and received periodically from field managers regarding probable environmental liabilities identified in their respective areas of responsibility. We accrue environmental liabilities when sufficient basic knowledge is available to form a preliminary estimation as to remediation cost. Although the full potential scope of the remediation cost may not be known with certainty, these accruals are made when the liability is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable, in accordance with IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets” for IFRS purposes. These estimated liabilities include assumptions resulting from an initial evaluation of damage, including land acreage to be remediated, depth of contamination and type of contamination. While the initial evaluation is extensive, there is a possibility that the actual scope of remediation could vary depending upon information gathered during the remediation process. For a further discussion of our environmental liabilities, see Note 3(l) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Unasserted or additional claims are not reflected in our identified liabilities. We are not aware of any such claims that would be of such magnitude as to materially affect our estimates of environmental liabilities. At the end of 2013, we were not aware of uncertainties with respect to joint and several liabilities that could affect our assessment of environmental contingencies or otherwise result in a major environmental liability. As of the date of this report, we are responsible for all production, processing, storage and distribution of petroleum and its derivatives in Mexico. As a result, we believe we are positioned to know immediately of any claims and are therefore directly accountable for any claims that may be brought against us.

Pemex-Exploration and Production remains responsible for handling existing environmental liabilities—these responsibilities are not part of the Integrated E&P Contracts. Nevertheless, the Integrated E&P Contracts include environmental clauses related to contractors’ and Pemex-Exploration and Production’s responsibility to ensure an adequate environmental performance, and also establish the terms for compensation and repair of any new environmental impacts.

The timing of remediation or cleanup of the sites to which these environmental liabilities relate is dependent upon the annual budget assigned to us by the Mexican Congress.

Social Responsibility

Petróleos Mexicanos has implemented various initiatives in the area of corporate social responsibility, primarily with respect to the protection and preservation of the environment, community relations with communities involved in Mexico’s oil and gas industry, ethical work practices, respect for labor rights and the general promotion of quality of life for employees. Our corporate and social responsibility goals are carried out through the following mechanisms:

 

mutually beneficial public works and investment projects;

 

cash donations;

 

donations of fuels and asphalts;

 

support of local suppliers;

 

higher education collaboration agreements;

 

environmental protection projects; and

 

programs to promote investment and employment.

Our total donations, contributions and mutual benefit projects in 20112013 amounted to more than Ps. 5.03.5 billion. Our donations and contributions amounted to Ps. 1.62.8 billion, or 32%80.0% of this total. The remaining Ps. 3.40.7 billion of the total donations contributions and mutual benefit projects consisted of infrastructure investments in the states of Campeche, Chiapas, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, México, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Puebla, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruzwhere Pemex-Exploration and Mexico City.Production operates. Approximately 67.9%56% of our donations and contributions were directed to the states principally involved in the crude oil industry (Campeche, Chiapas, Tabasco, Tamaulipas and Veracruz); 23.0%21% to the states with medium involvement in the crude oil industry (Coahuila, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla and Puebla)San Luis Potosí); and 24% to the remaining 9.1% to states that do not participate in the crude oil industry.states.

Most importantly, we took the following specific actions in 2011:2013:

 

we donated asphalt to build, repair, pave and refurbish roads and highways, as well as magna gasoline, diesel and jet fuel for the operation of vehicles and machinery as a service to the state and municipal governments of Tabasco, Veracruz, Estado de México, Guerrero, Tamaulipas, Hidalgo, Chiapas, Oaxaca, Nuevo León, Puebla, Colima and Durango for a total value of approximately Ps. 1,398.5 million;

we provided support for programsprojects aimed at the conservation of biodiversity, forest restoration, improvements in hydrologic systemssustainable social development, including projects aimed at guaranteeingdeveloping social infrastructure, protecting the environment and improving the quality of life of communities involved in the oil and gas industry in the state of Tabasco worth approximately Ps. 100.0 million;

we made contributions for infrastructure projects to build, repair, pave and refurbish roads and highways, as well as for purchases of civil protection equipment, emergency vehicles and support for health services, among others, in the state of Veracruz for a total of approximately Ps. 89.8 million;

we made contributions to support productive hydraulic infrastructure projects, to promote economic development, culture and recreation and to develop the fishing sector in the state of Campeche of approximately Ps. 177.5 million;

we provided support for the second stage of construction of the Parque Bicentenario (Bicentennial Park) in the state of Tamaulipas worth approximately Ps. 20.0 million;

we donated 1.5 million liters of jet fuel, worth approximately Ps. 19.2 million, to aid the rescue efforts in response to Tropical Storm Manuel and Hurricane Ingrid;

we provided support for environmental education, restoration and conservation in natural protected areas through the following programs:

Conservación, manejo y restauración de los ecosistemas naturales de la cuenca media del río Usumacinta(Conservation, management and restoration of the ecosystems in the middle basin of the Usumacinta River) in the state of Chiapas for approximately Ps. 10.0 million;

Programa de investigación, educación ambiental y operación de la casa del agua en los pantanos de Centla, Tabasco (Program of research, environmental education and operation of the water house in the Centla marshes in the state of Tabasco) for approximately Ps. 8.5 million;

Proyecto de educación ambiental y restauración forestal en las areas naturales protegidas del golfo de México, subregión planicie costera (Environmental education and reforestation project in the natural protected areas of the gulf of Mexico, sub-region of the coastal plains);

Corredor socio-cultural ambiental del sur de Veracruz: rescate del orgullo regional (Sociocultural and environmental corridor of southern Veracruz: rescue of the regional pride);

Educación ambiental y recuperación ecológica de manglares y selvas bajas en el estado de Veracruz (Environmental education and ecological recovery of the swamps and low rainforests of Veracruz); and

Programa de construcción de ecotecnias en la cuenca de Valle de Bravo (Environmentally sustainable construction in the Valle de Bravo basin).

During 2013, our primary social responsibility initiatives included projects focused on biodiversity conservation, reforestation, hydrologic improvement to ensure water supply and other environmental services, particularly carbon sequestration, in seven protected areas locatededucation in the states of Tamaulipas, Veracruz, and Tabasco;

we provided various forms of environmental support, including support to ensure that oil installations located in the Tabasqueña plain had sufficient water supply, contributions to reduce the environmental impact caused by extreme weather events, such as for hurricanes that recurrently occur along the coastal areas in the state of Tabasco, and support to increase the supply of nutrients in the Gulf of Mexico to support the food chain;

we provided support for environmental education and related programs in several states, including environmental education and programs for environmental recovery and reforestation in the state of Veracruz, environmental education and the operation of the “Casa del Agua” in Pantanos de Centla, Tabasco, environmental education in the communities of the biosphere reserve in Montes Azules and Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas, as well as various education-related projects in the states of Chihuahua and Sinaloa;

we made contributions to improve the infrastructure of several states of Mexico, including supporting the Parallel Aqueduct Chicbul-Carmen project in the state of Campeche, the construction, maintenance, extension and restoration of urban, hydraulic and sanitary infrastructure work in the municipalities of Reforma, Pichucalco, Juárez, Ostuacán and Sunuapa, in the state of Chiapas and hydraulic concrete paving in the state of Guanajuato and in the Oleoducto avenue in the Salinas Cruz municipality in the state of Oaxaca; andCampeche.

we provided support for the program aimed at the conservation, handling and restoration of natural ecosystems located in the Middle Basin of the Usumacinta River in the state of Chiapas.

Environmental Projects and Expenditures

In 2011,2013, we spent approximately Ps. 10,0657,093 million on environmental projects and related expenditures, as compared to Ps. 10,0838,894 million in 2010.2012. For 2012,2014, we have budgeted Ps. 12,69211,411 million for environmental projects and expenditures, including modernization of installations, implementation of systems and mechanisms to monitor and control atmospheric pollution, acquisition of equipment to address contingencies related to hydrocarbon spills, the expansion of water effluent systems, restoration and reforestation of affected areas, studies for environmental investigation and the conducting of environmental audits. In addition, we continue to conduct extensive research and development efforts to increase our capacity to produce gasoline, diesel and fuel oil with lower sulfur content at our refineries in Mexico.

We do not believe that the cost of complying with environmental laws or environmental requirements related to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) among the governments of Mexico, the United States and Canada, the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, the Agreement on Environmental Cooperation between the Governments of Mexico and Canada or Mexico’s membership in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, has caused or will cause a significant increase in our environmental expenditures.

TRADE REGULATION AND EXPORT AGREEMENTS

Though Mexico is not a member of OPEC, it has periodically announced increases and decreases in PEMEX’sour crude oil exports reflecting production revisions made by other oil producing countries, in order to contribute to crude oil prices stabilization. However, PEMEX haswe have not changed itsour export goals because of announcements made by OPEC since 2004, and we believe that Mexico has no current plans to change PEMEX’sour current level of crude oil exports.

NAFTA did not affect Mexico’s exclusive rights, through Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-GasPemex Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, to explore and exploit crude oil and natural gas in Mexico, to refine and process crude oil and natural gas and to produce basic petrochemicals in Mexico. Since 2003, non-basic petrochemical products have enjoyed a zero tariff under NAFTA and, subject to limited exceptions, exports of crude oil and petroleum products from Mexico to the United States and Canada have been free or exempt from tariffs. Similarly, since 2003, Mexico’s imports of petroleum products from the United States and Canada have also been exempt from tariffs. In addition, in 2004, NAFTA approved lower tariffs on certain materials and equipment imported by Mexico. The zero tariff on Mexico’s imports of non-basic petrochemicals from the United States and Canada could have increased competition in the non-basic petrochemicals industry in Mexico. To the extent that domestic and international prices for our products remain constant, lower tariffs on products, materials and equipment that we import from and export to the United States and Canada, reduce our expenses and increase our revenue.

TAXES AND DUTIES

General

Taxes and duties applicable to PEMEXus are a significant source of revenues to the Mexican Government. We contributed approximately 32.9%32.8% of the Mexican Government’s revenues in 20102012 and 33.7%32.2% in 2011.2013. In 2011,2013, we paid a number of special hydrocarbon taxes and duties, in addition to the other taxes and duties paid by some of the subsidiary companies, as described below under “—Other Taxes.” Until 2006, the rates at which the Mexican Congress assessed hydrocarbon taxes and duties could vary from year to year and were set after taking into consideration our operating budget, our capital expenditure program and our financing needs. A newThe fiscal regime for Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities, described below, became effective in 2006.

Fiscal Regime for PEMEX

The Mexican Congress approved a newthe current fiscal regime for Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities on November 10, 2005, which was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on December 21, 2005. The new fiscal regime went into effect on January 1, 2006, but was modified in 2007, with effect from January 1, 2008; in 2008, with effect from January 1, 2009; in 2009, with effect from January 1, 2010;2010, 2011 and in 2010, with effect from January 1, 2011.Under2013. Under the current fiscal regime, Pemex-Exploration and Production is governed by theLey Federal de Derechos (Federal Duties Law), while the other subsidiary entities are governed by theLey de Ingresos de la Federación(Federal Revenue Law) for the applicable fiscal year.

In 20112013 and 2012,2014, the fiscal regime for Pemex-Exploration and Production consisted of the following duties:

 

Derecho Ordinario sobre Hidrocarburos
(Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty)

This duty is applied to the annual value of extracted production of crude oil and natural gas minus certain permitted deductions (including specific investments, certain costs and expenses, and the other duties referred to below, subject to certain conditions), and applies to all crude oil and natural gas productionother than (1) production from fields located in (1) the Paleocanal de Chicontepec and (2) in the deep waters inof the Gulf of Mexico and (2)(3) annual production in excess of an annual “base” level of production from specified marginal fields. The applicableA rate for this duty was 72.5%of 71.5% applied in 2011,2013 and is 71.5%will apply in 2012 and thereafter.subsequent years. Deduction of costs must not exceed U.S. $6.50 per barrel of crude oil and U.S. $2.70 per thousand cubic feet of non-associated natural gas. Production of oil and gas extracted from fields located in Paleocanal de Chicontepec and the deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico, and production in excess of base production from marginal fields, is subject to the Special Hydrocarbons Duty, the Extraction of Hydrocarbons Duty and the Additional Duty on Hydrocarbons.

Derecho Especial sobre Hidrocarburos
(Special Hydrocarbons Duty)

A rate ranging fromof 30% toor 36% is applied to the value of extracted production of crude oil and natural gas for the year from the fields located in the

Paleocanal de Chicontepec and in the deep waters inof the Gulf of Mexico, and to the value of production in excess of base production from marginal fields, minus in each case certain permitted deductions (including specific investments, certain expenses and costs, among others, subject to certain conditions)., subject to the limit established by the Federal Duties law, which was U.S. $36.7670 and U.S $36.8184 per barrel of crude oil equivalent in 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Derecho sobre la Extracción de Hidrocarburos

(Extraction (Extraction of Hydrocarbons Duty)

A rate of 15% is applied to the value of extracted production of crude oil and natural gas for the year from fields located in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec and in the deep waters inof the Gulf of Mexico, and to the value ofannual production in excess of basean annual “base” level of production from marginal fields.

Derecho Adicional sobre Hidrocarburos
(Additional Duty on Hydrocarbons)

A rate of 52% is applied to the value resulting from the multiplication of (i) the difference between the annual Mexican crude oil export price corresponding to the field from which such crude oil is extracted, and a threshold price of U.S. $63.91$67.8777 for 2011,2013 and U.S. $67.9727 for 2014, by (ii) the extracted volume for the relevant year. This duty is applied only to fields located in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec and in the deep waters inof the Gulf of Mexico and production in excess of base production from marginal fields, and only if the Mexican crude oil export price per barrel of the extracted crude oil is greater than the threshold price. Each year, the threshold price at which the duty takes effect is adjusted to take account of inflation, as measured by the change in the U.S. producer price index.

Derecho sobre Hidrocarburos para el
Fondo de Estabilización

(Hydrocarbons (Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund)

Rates between 1% and 10% are applied to the value of the extracted crude oil production when the weighted average Mexican crude oil export price for a certain year exceeds between U.S. $22.00 and U.S. $31.00 per barrel.

These rates apply to all crude oil production other than production from fields located (1) in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec and (2) in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico and (3) production in excess of an annual “base” level of production from specified marginal fields.

Derecho para la Investigación Científica y
Tecnológica en Materia de Energía

(Duty for Scientific and Technological
Research on Energy)

A rate of 0.50%0.65% of the value of extracted crude oil and natural gas production applied in 2011. This rate increased to 0.65% for 20122013 and will apply in subsequent years.

Derecho para la Fiscalización Petrolera
(Duty for Oil Monitoring)

A rate of 0.003% is applied to the value of extracted production of crude oil and natural gas for the year.

Derecho Extraordinario sobre la
Exportación de Petróleo Crudo
(Extraordinary Duty on Crude Oil Exports)

A rate of 13.1% is applied to the value resulting from the multiplication of (i) the difference between the annual weighted average Mexican crude oil export price and the budgeted crude oil price, by (ii) the annual export volume. The budgeted crude oil price for 20112013 was U.S. $65.40$86.00 per barrel and for 20122014 is U.S. $84.90$85.00 per barrel.

The Extraordinary Duty on Crude Oil Exports did not have an impact on our cash outflows in 2013 because it was credited against the Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund.

Derecho para Regular y Supervisar la
Exploración y Explotación de Hidrocarburos

(Duty to Regulate and Supervise the Exploration and Exploitation of Hydrocarbons).

A rate of 0.03% is applied to the value of extracted production of crude oil and natural gas, beginning on January 1, 2012.

gas.

The Federal Duties Law, for purposes of the duties mentioned above, defines the deep water fields as those located in waters with an average depth of 500 meters or greater, and the Paleocanal de Chicontepec fields as those located in the following areas: Castillo de Teayo, Coatzintla, Coyutla, Chicontepec, Espinal, Ixhuatlán de Madero, Temapache, Papantla, Poza Rica de Hidalgo, Tepetzintla and Tihuatlán, in the state of Veracruz; and Francisco Z. Mena, Pantepec and Venustiano Carranza, in the state of Puebla.greater.

The Federal Duties Law defines marginal fields as those fields that are abandoned or in the process of being abandoned. In 2011, the following2013 and 2014, 101 fields were categorized as marginal fields: the Blasillo, Cinco Presidentes, La Venta, Magallanes, Ogarrio, Otates, Rodador, San Alfonso and San Ramón fields, located in the area of Magallanes Cinco Presidentes; the Arenque, Atún, Bagre, Carpa, Escualo, Isla de Lobos, Jurel, Lobina, Marsopa, Mejillón, Morsa, Náyade and Tiburón fields, located in the area of Arenque; and the Altamira, Barcodón, Cacalilao, Corcovado, Ébano, Limón, Pánuco, Salinas, Tamaulipas Constituciones and Topila fields, located in the area of Altamira. In addition, the following103 fields were categorized as marginal fields, in 2012: San Andrés, Remolino, Tierra Blanca, Potrero del llano-Horcones, Hallazgo, Cerro Viejo, Temapache, Alazán, Vara Alta, Kach, Amoca, Alak, Tecoalli and Ichalkil.respectively.

On January 1, 2011, an amendment to the Federal Duties Law became effective, which revoked theDerecho Único sobre Hidrocarburos(Sole Hydrocarbons Duty). In its place, the Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty, the Duty for Scientific and Technological Research on Energy, the Duty for Oil Monitoring, the Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund and the Extraordinary Duty on Crude Oil Exports are applied to the annual base production (production below a certain threshold) from each of the marginal fields in accordance with the Federal Duties Law.

Once the annual base production level is reached, any production above that threshold will be subject to the Extraction of Hydrocarbons Duty, the Special Hydrocarbons Duty and the Additional Duty on Hydrocarbons.

As described above, fluctuating crude oil price levels directly affect the level of certain taxes and duties that we pay. The Extraordinary Duty on Crude Oil Exports did not have an impact on our cash outflow, because it was credited against the Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund. The fiscal regime for Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities, with the exception of Pemex-Exploration and Production, consists of the following taxes and duties:

 

Impuesto a los Rendimientos Petroleros
(Hydrocarbons Income Tax)

A tax rate of 30% is applied to net income, as determined in accordance with the Federal Revenue Law for the applicable fiscal year.

IEPS taxTax

The IEPS tax is an indirect tax on domestic sales of gasoline and diesel that Pemex-Refining collects on behalf of the Mexican Government. The IEPS tax on the sale of gasoline and diesel is equivalent to the difference between the international reference price of each product (adjusted by freight costs and quality factors) and the retail price of the product (not including value added tax, the retailers’ margin and freight costs). Thus, the Mexican Government ensures that we retain an amount reflecting the international prices (adjusted as described above) of these products, while the Mexican Government collects the difference between the international prices and the prices at which these products are sold in Mexico.

 Since 2005, as a result of the new rules to calculate this tax rate, some rates have been negative. The Federal Revenue Law for each of the Fiscal Years of 2006 to 20112014 provided that the IEPS tax amounts resulting from applying negative rates could be credited against the IEPS tax liability, and, if in excess, could be credited against the value added tax. Any remaining amount could be credited against the Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty. Negative IEPS taxes, if any, in 20122014 may also be credited in accordance with the same rules.

Impuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicios a beneficio de entidades federativas, municipios y demarcaciones territoriales (IEPS Tax in favor of states, municipalities and territories)

The IEPS Tax in favor of states, municipalities and territories is an indirect tax on domestic sales of gasoline and diesel that Pemex-Refining collects on behalf of the Mexican Government. The applicable rates for the tax are 36 cents per liter of Magna gasoline, 43.92 cents per liter of Premium gasoline and 29.88 cents per liter of

diesel. The resources obtained will be allocated to states, municipalities and territories, as provided in theLey de Coordinación Fiscal (Tax Coordination Law).

IEPS sobre Combustibles Fósiles (IEPS Tax on Fossil Fuels)

Beginning in 2014, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals will collect, on behalf of the Mexican Government, an IEPS tax on the sale of fossil fuels. The applicable rates will be as follows: 5.91 cents per liter for propane; 7.66 cents per liter for butane; 10.38 cents per liter for gasolines and aviation gasoline; 12.40 cents per liter for jet fuel and other kerosenes; 12.59 cents per liter for diesel; 13.45 cents per liter for fuel oil; and 15.60 pesos per ton for petroleum coke.

Fluctuating crude oil price levels directly affect the level of certain taxes and duties that we pay. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to Our Relationship with the Mexican Government—Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities pay special taxes and duties to the Mexican Government, which may limit our capacity to expand our investment program.”

In 2011,2013, we paid total taxes and duties in the amount of Ps. 876.0864.9 billion (56.2%(53.8% of nettotal sales), as compared to the Ps. 654.1902.6 billion (51.0%(54.8% of sales revenues)total sales) of taxes and duties that we paid in 2010,2012, mainly due to the increasedecrease in Mexican crude oil export prices in 2011.2013.

Other Taxes

Since 1994, our interest payments on our external debt have been subject to Mexican Government withholding taxes. Nevertheless, withholding taxes do not represent a substantial portion of our total tax liability.

We are subject to municipal and state taxes, such as real property and payroll taxes. However, because most of our facilities are located on federal property, which is not subject to municipal taxation, real property taxes are not a significant part of our overall taxes. Similarly, payroll taxes do not represent a substantial portion of our total tax liability.

Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are exempt from Mexican corporate income tax; however, some of our subsidiary companies are Mexican corporations and are subject to the tax regime applicable to all other Mexican corporations. In 2013, Mexican companies paypaid the higher of the two tax rates described below: The first iswas a corporate income tax at a rate of 30% applied to revenues, less certain deductions. Thedeductions; the second iswas theImpuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única (Flat Rate Business Tax), which replaced the asset tax at the beginning of 2008 and imposed a minimum tax equal to 17.0%17.5% of a corporation’s sales revenues (less certain deductions and certain investment expenditures) for 2009;. Effective 2014, the rate of this tax increased to 17.5% for 2010 and thereafter.Flat Rate Business Tax was eliminated.

In addition, we have a number of non-Mexican subsidiary companies that may be subject to taxation in the jurisdiction of their incorporation or operations. The aggregate taxes paid by the subsidiary companies were Ps. 1,755.8769.6 million in 2009,2012 and Ps. 1,724.82,660.4 million in 2010 and Ps. 3,620.5 million in 2011.2013.

No assurance can be given that our tax regime will not change in the future. The Energy Reform Decree contemplates that the secondary legislation implementing it will include a new fiscal regime applicable to us. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Considerations Related to Mexico—The effects of the Energy Reform Decree and its implementation are uncertain but likely to be material” and “—Risk Factors Related to theOur Relationship between PEMEX andwith the Mexican Government—Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities pay special taxes, duties and dividends to the Mexican Government, which may limit PEMEX’sour capacity to expand itsour investment program.”

UNITED MEXICAN STATES

The information in this section with regard to Mexico has been included due to Petróleos Mexicanos’Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities’ relationship with the Mexican Government and has been reviewed by the SHCP.

Form of Government

The President is the chief of the executive branch of the Mexican Government. The President is elected by the popular vote of Mexican citizens who are 18 years of age or older. The Mexican Constitution limits the President to one six-year term; the President is not allowed to run for reelection. In accordance with Mexico’s electoral law, on September 5, 2006,August 31, 2012, theTribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación (the federal electoral court)(Federal Electoral Court) officially validated the results of the presidential election held in Mexico on July 2, 20061, 2012, and declared Felipe de Jesús Calderón Hinojosa,Mr. Enrique Peña Nieto, a member of the PAN,PRI, President-elect. President CalderónMr. Peña Nieto took office on December 1, 20062012 and his term expireswill expire on November 30, 2012. The Political Constitution of the United Mexican States limits the President to one six-year term and does not allow reelection for any additional terms. The next presidential election will occur on July 1, 2012.2018.

ThePartido Revolucionario Institucional (Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI) was the dominant political party in Mexico for more than seven decades. From 1929 to 1994, the PRI won all presidential elections, and, from 1929 until July 1997, the PRI held a majority of the seats in both chambers of the Mexican Congress. Until 1989, the PRI also won all of the state gubernatorial elections. However, inIn July 2000, the candidate offrom theAlianza por el Cambio(Alliance (Alliance for Change), a coalition betweenof the PAN,Partido Acción Nacional (National Action Party, or PAN), the oldest opposition party in Mexico,the country, and thePartido Verde Ecologista de México(Ecological (Ecological Green Party of Mexico)Party), won the presidential election. TheIn addition, in 2006, Mr. Felipe de Jesús Calderón Hinojosa, a member of the PAN, currently holds sixwas elected President. However, in 2012, the PRI candidate was once again elected President. Each of Mexico’s 31 states is headed by a state governorships,governor. Mexico’s Federal District, Mexico City, is headed by an elected mayor. Local elections were most recently held on July 7, 2013. These elections were for the Baja California governorship. By forming an alliance with thePartido de la Revolución Democrática(Democratic (Democratic Revolution Party, or PRD) holds twoand thePartido Nueva Alianza (New Alliance Party), the PAN was able to retain the Baja California governorship.

As a result of this election, Mexico’s state governorships and are now composed as follows:

the governorshipPRD holds three state governorships, along with the mayorship of the Federal District and theCoalición Por el Bien de Todos(Coalition for District;

the Wellbeing of Everyone), an alliance formed by PRD, thePartido del Trabajo (Labor Party) and theMovimiento Ciudadano (Citizen Movement Party),PAN holds onethree state governorship, and governorships;

an alliance formed by the PAN and the PRD holds threefour state governorships. Thegovernorships; and

the PRI holds the remaining 1921 of the 31 state governorships.

Legislative authority is vested in the Mexican Congress, which is composed of theCámara de Senadores(Senate) and theCámara de Diputados (Chamber Chamber of Deputies).Deputies. Members of the Mexican Congress are elected either directly or through a system of proportional representation by the popular vote of Mexican citizens who are 18 years of age or older. Senators serve a six-year term, deputies serve a three-year term and neither may serve consecutive terms in the same chamber. The Senate is composed of 128 members, 96 of whom are elected directly, while the other 32 are elected through a system of proportional representation. The Chamber of Deputies is composed of 500 members, 300 of whom are elected directly by national electoral districts, andwhile the other 200 of whom are elected through a system of proportional representation. Under this proportional representation that

allocates thosesystem, seats are allocated to political party representatives based on the proportion of the votes cast for those parties that receive at least 2.0% of the national vote.vote, among other requirements. The PoliticalMexican Constitution of the United Mexican States provides that the President may veto bills and that the Mexican Congress may override such vetoes with a two-thirds majority vote of each chamber.

In

Congressional elections for all 128 seats in the congressional election held on July 5, 2009, theSenate and 500 seats in the Chamber of Deputies were up for election. The members of the Senate were electedheld on July 2, 2006.1, 2012. The following table provides the current distribution of congressional seats, reflecting certainpost-election changes in the party affiliations of certain senators and deputies.

Party Representation in the Mexican Congress

 

  Senate Chamber of Deputies   Senate Chamber of Deputies 
  Seats % of Total Seats   % of Total   Seats   % of Total Seats   % of Total 

Institutional Revolutionary Party

   54     42.2  213     42.6

National Action Party

   50    39.1  142     28.4   38     29.7    114     22.8  

Institutional Revolutionary Party

   33    25.8    239     47.9  

Democratic Revolution Party

   24    18.8    68     13.8     22     17.2    101     20.2  

Ecological Green Party of Mexico

   7    5.5    23     4.6     7     5.5    28     5.6  

Labor Party

   5     3.9    14     2.8  

Citizen Movement Party

   5    3.9    6     1.2     1     0.8    20     4.0  

Labor Party

   5    3.9    13     2.6  

New Alliance

   0    0.0    7     1.4     1     0.8    10     2.0  

Unaffiliated

   4    3.1    1     0.2     0     0.0    0     0.0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

   128    100.0  500     100.0   128     100.0  500     100.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Source: Senate and Chamber of Representatives.Deputies.

The Economy

Program forNational Development Plan

ThePlan Nacional de Desarrollo 2013-2018 (National Development Plan), published in the Promotion of Growth and Employment

ThePrograma para Impulsar el Crecimiento y el Empleo(“Program for the Promotion of Growth and Employment”), announced on October 8, 2008, was intended to mitigate the impactOfficial Gazette of the deteriorationFederation on May 20, 2013, establishes the basic goals and objectives of the international economic environment on the Mexican economy. In creating this program, the Mexican Government expected that the extreme contraction of liquidity in the international financial markets and equity, debt and foreign exchange market volatility, as well as the economic recessions experienced by Mexico’s trading partners, were likely to have adverse effects on the Mexican economy, including:President Peña Nieto during his six-year term. These objectives are:

 

1.to achieve peace in Mexico, thereby promoting a firm base for democracy, governance and security;

a decrease

2.to make Mexico more inclusive for its citizens and better protect their social rights;

3.to improve the quality of, and increase access to, Mexico’s education system;

4.to promote prosperity by stimulating sustainable economic growth, with a particular emphasis on improving equality of opportunities; and

5.to emphasize Mexico’s role as a responsible global actor, by: (i) focusing on its external policy goals; (ii) promoting free international trade; and (iii) being a positive and proactive force in the international community.

In addition, the National Development Plan proposes the following three general strategies that will be incorporated in exports, remittances, tourism revenues and foreign direct investment inflows;

reduced availability of credit, as financial intermediaries adopted more conservative lending policies, thereby diminishing access to foreign credit; and

lower oil prices, leading to decreased public sector revenues.

The specific goals of the Program for the Promotion of Growth and Employment were to:all government policies:

 

Strategy

Rationale

Democratization of productivity

This strategy: (1) facilitates the growth and competitiveness of the Mexican economy; (2) carries out public policies that eliminate obstacles limiting the productivity of Mexican citizens and corporations; and (3) encourages participants in the Mexican economy to efficiently utilize resources.
Create an effective and modern governmentThis strategy: (1) guarantees access to information and the protection of personal data; (2) expands the use and development of information and communication technologies in order to improve the effectiveness of governmental actions; and (3) consolidates a government that is productive and effective at attaining its objectives through the appropriate allocation of resources, promotion based on individual merit, promulgation of best practices and implementation of automated administrative systems.

Promote gender equality

This strategy incorporates the principle of gender equality in all government policies and actions.

compensate for the expected lower government revenues, which would ordinarily require a reduction in programmable expenditures;

stimulate economic activity and create jobs through a variety of infrastructure projects aimed at specific sectors such as education, housing and highways;

increase the availability of financing and credit, for financing infrastructure and for supporting small- and medium-sized firms, through the Mexican development banks; and

foster long-term economic growth.

Gross Domestic Product

According to preliminary figures,The following table sets forth the percentage change in Mexico’s real gross domestic product (GDP) contracted by 6.1%economic sector in 2009, as compared to 2008. Global economic activity began to recover beginning inconstant 2008 pesos for the second half of 2009, after a deep contraction observed in the previous six months. The recovery was drivenperiods indicated.

Real GDP Growth by fiscal and monetary stimulus programs implemented in many advanced economies and in some emerging market countries, as well as the several measures taken to stabilize the operation of the international financial system.Sector

(% change against prior years)(1)

   2008  2009  2010(2)  2011(2)  2012(2)  2013(2) 

GDP (constant 2008 prices)

   1.4  (4.7)%   5.1  4.0  3.9  1.1

Primary Activities:

       

Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting and livestock

   1.3    (2.5  0.8    (2.3  7.3    0.3  

Secondary Activities:

       

Mining

   (3.7  (4.0  0.9    (0.4  0.8    (1.7

Utilities

   1.3    1.3    4.5    6.7    2.3    0.2  

Construction

   3.8    (6.1  0.8    4.0    2.0    (4.5

Manufacturing

   (1.0  (8.4  8.5    4.6    3.8    1.4  

Tertiary activities:

       

Wholesale and retail trade

   0.2    (12.5  11.9    9.4    4.4    2.8  

Transportation and warehousing

   (0.1  (7.2  7.7    4.0    4.4    1.5  

Information

   6.0    8.5    1.0    4.2    16.4    5.5  

Finance and insurance

   21.9    3.4    21.0    7.1    8.5    3.8  

Real estate, rental and leasing

   3.3    1.1    2.8    2.8    2.5    1.5  

Professional, scientific and technical services

   3.1    (5.0  (0.1  5.0    1.1    (1.0

Management of companies and enterprises

   7.5    (8.2  5.3    3.4    6.7    (5.7

Administrative support, waste management and remediation services

   2.2    (7.0  0.7    5.9    4.4    3.9  

Education services

   1.1    0.2    0.2    1.6    2.2    1.1  

Health care and social assistance

   1.3    2.0    (0.1  2.1    2.1    2.0  

Arts, entertainment and recreation

   0.3    (4.1  4.1    (0.8  2.9    0.1  

Accommodation and food services

   0.1    (9.6  1.9    1.5    5.4    2.1  

Other services (except public administration)

   1.3    (0.6  1.0    1.8    2.8    1.7  

Public administration

   2.0    2.0    2.4    (1.4  3.8    0.8  

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Based on GDP calculated in constant 2008 pesos.
(2)Preliminary figures.

Source: INEGI.

According to preliminary figures, Mexico’s GDP increased by 5.5%1.1% in real terms during 2010,2013, as compared with 2009,to 2012. The decrease in the growth rate of GDP, as compared to the growth rate in prior periods, was due to a decrease in productive activity during the first half of 2013, which recovered during the second half of 2013 as Mexico’s economic activity experienced an upward trend. The economic recovery experienced since the third quarter of 2013 is a result of greater external demand and a recovery of some domestic demand components in the fourth quarter.

Prices and Wages

Consumer inflation (as measured by the change in the national consumer price index, or the NCPI) for 2013 was 4.0%, 0.4 percentage points higher than during 2012. Annual inflation remained within the interval of plus/minus one percentage point around the 3 percent target in the fourth quarter of 2013. Despite this, annual inflation rebounded in November and December, mainly as a result of greater price increments of two fully identified factors: (1) unexpected increments in public transport fares in some cities in Mexico; and (2) higher prices for a reduced number of agricultural products caused by weather conditions that delayed their production over the positive impact of increased external demand on the manufacturing and services sectors. The agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting sector grew by 2.8%; the mining sector grew by 1.1%; the utilities sector grew by 10.3%; the construction sector remained unchanged; the manufacturing sector grew by 9.7%; the wholesale and retail trade sector grew by 13.7%; the transportation and warehousing sector grew by 7.5%; the information sector grew by 1.6%; the finance and insurance sector grew by 12.3%; the real estate, rental and leasing sector grew by 1.9%; management of companies and enterprises grew by 5.5%; administrative and support and waste management and remediation services grew by 1.6%; education services grew by 0.1%; health care and social assistance grew by 0.8%; arts, entertainment and recreation grew by 6.0%; accommodation and food services grew by 3.2%; other services (except public administration) grew by 0.7%; and public administration grew by 2.6%, each in real terms as compared to 2009. However, professional, scientific and technical services decreased by 1.0% in real terms as compared to 2009.

According to preliminary figures, Mexico’s GDP grew by 3.9% in real terms during 2011, as compared with 2010. The utilities sector grew by 5.5%; the construction sector grew by 4.8%; the manufacturing sector grew by 5.1%; the wholesale and retail trade sector grew by 7.6%; the transportation and warehousing sector grew by 3.5%; the information sector grew by 6.6%; the finance and insurance sector grew by 4.8%; the real estate, rental and leasing sector grew by 2.1%; professional, scientific and technical services grew by 5.9%; management of companies and enterprises grew by 5.7%; administrative support, waste management and remediation services grew by 4.3%; education services grew by 1.5%; health care and social assistance grew by 1.6%; arts, entertainment and recreation grew by 6.4%; accommodation and food services grew by 2.6%; and other services (except public administration) grew by 4.0%, each in real terms as compared to 2010. The agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting sector decreased by 0.6%; the mining sector decreased by 2.3%; and public administration decreased by 0.8%, each in real terms during 2011, as compared to 2010.

The following table sets forth the change in Mexico’s real GDP by sector for the periods indicated.

Real GDP Growth by Sector(1)

   2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011(1) 

GDP (constant 2003 prices)

   5.2  3.3  1.2  (6.1)%   5.5  3.9

Primary Activities:

       

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting

   6.3    2.3    1.2    (2.2  2.8    (0.6

Secondary Activities:

       

Mining

   1.4    (0.2  (1.7  (2.9  1.1    (2.3

Utilities

   12.2    3.7    (2.3  2.0    10.3    5.5  

Construction

   7.8    4.4    3.1    (7.3  0.0    4.8  

Manufacturing

   5.9    1.7    (0.7  (9.8  9.7    5.1  

Tertiary activities:

       

Wholesale and retail trade

   6.5    5.0    0.9    (14.1  13.7    7.6  

Transportation and warehousing

   5.8    3.7    0.0    (6.5  7.5    3.5  

Information

   10.7    11.6    8.0    0.8    1.6    6.6  

Finance and insurance

   16.3    13.9    12.8    (4.5  12.3    4.8  

Real estate, rental and leasing

   4.1    3.1    3.0    (1.6  1.9    2.1  

Professional, scientific and technical services

   3.0    3.1    3.0    (5.1  (1.0  5.9  

Management of companies and enterprises

   20.1    (3.0  14.0    (8.1  5.5    5.7  

Administrative support, waste management and remediation services

   3.7    3.1    1.6    (4.8  1.6    4.3  

Education services

   0.1    1.9    0.8    0.5    0.1    1.5  

Health care and social assistance

   7.8    2.5    (1.5  0.8    0.8    1.6  

Arts, entertainment and recreation

   2.3    3.1    1.5    (4.6  6.0    6.4  

Accommodation and food services

   1.6    2.6    0.9    (7.7  3.2    2.6  

Other services (except public administration)

   3.3    3.9    0.7    (1.1  0.7    4.0  

Public administration

   0.1    1.7    1.1    4.8    2.6    (0.8

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Preliminary. These figures are subject to periodic revision.

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (National Institute of Statistics and Geography.)

Prices and Wagesprevious months.

Consumer inflation (as measured by the change in the NCPI) during 2010for the two months ended February 28, 2014 was 4.4%1.1%, 1.10.2 percentage points higher than inflation as estimated in the budget for that year and 0.8 percentage points higher than during 2009. Inflation in 2010 was higher than the amount estimated in the budget for that year due to (1) the appreciation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar; (2) a positive output gap (which occurs when the growth of aggregate demand exceeds the growth of aggregate supply); and (3) moderate wage increases, among other factors.

Consumer inflation for the year ended December 31, 2011 was 3.8%, 0.6 percentage points lower than during 2010.

Consumer inflation for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was 0.97%, 0.1 percentage points lower than during the same period of 2011.2013.

Unemployment RateEmployment and Labor

At December 31, 2011, theAccording to preliminary figures, Mexico’s unemployment rate was 4.5%, as compared to an unemployment4.6% during February 2014, a 0.2 percentage point decrease from the rate during the same period of 4.9% at December 31, 2010.

2013.

At March 31, 2012, the unemployment rate was 4.6%, as compared to an unemployment rate of 4.5% at December 31, 2011.

Interest Rates

During 2010,2013, interest rates on 28-dayCetes (Mexican Federal Treasury bills (Cetes)Certificates) averaged 4.4% and interest3.8%, as compared to 4.2% during 2012. Interest rates on 91-dayCetes averaged 4.6%3.8%, as compared to average rates on 28-dayCetes4.4% during 2012.

During the first three months of 5.4% and on 91-dayCetes of 5.5% during 2009.

During 2011,2014, interest rates on 28-dayCetes averaged 4.2% and interest3.15%, as compared to 4.11% during the same period of 2013. Interest rates on 91-dayCetes averaged 4.4%3.37%, as compared to average rates on 28-dayCetesof 4.4% and on 91-dayCetes of 4.6% during 2010.

During the first three months of 2012, interest rates on 28-dayCetes averaged 4.3% and interest rates on 91-dayCetes averaged 4.4%, as compared to average rates on 28-dayCetesof 4.2% and on 91-dayCetes of 4.4%4.17% during the same period of 2011. 2013.

On April 19, 2012,March 27, 2014, the 28-dayCetes rate was 4.3%3.19% and the 91-dayCetes rate was 4.3%3.30%.

Principal Sectors of the Economy

Manufacturing

The following table sets forth the change in industrial manufacturing output by sector for the periods indicated.

Industrial Manufacturing Output Differential

(% change against prior years)(2)

   2009  2010(1)  2011(1)  2012(1)  2013(1) 

Food

   (0.3)%   1.7  2.1  1.6  0.4

Beverage and tobacco products

   0.3    0.6    4.5    2.3    1.0  

Textile mills

   (7.4  10.9    (4.5  3.1    (3.2

Textile product mills

   (7.8  2.5    (2.9  (0.2  2.9  

Apparel

   (7.6  4.6    0.1    (0.7  3.1  

Leather and allied products

   (4.8  7.7    (0.7  2.6    0.8  

Wood products

   (4.7  5.5    5.0    14.2    (2.8

Paper

   (0.6  3.7    (0.9  4.6    2.6  

Printing and related support activities

   (6.5  10.0    4.1    (4.0  (7.2

Petroleum and coal products

   0.5    (7.2  (3.7  1.3    2.2  

Chemicals

   (3.1  (0.4  (0.2  (1.1  0.6  

Plastics and rubber products

   (9.6  13.5    7.2    10.1    (0.5

Nonmetallic mineral products

   (9.4  4.7    4.7    2.2    (2.7

Primary metals

   (16.4  12.4    4.7    1.2    0.0  

Fabricated metal products

   (14.1  8.8    6.9    5.8    0.6  

Machinery

   (19.9  47.2    13.4    6.1    (1.8

Computers and electronic products

   (10.2  3.7    6.5    2.2    13.3  

Electrical equipment, appliances and components

   (10.7  10.1    2.0    1.7    (2.2

Transportation equipment

   (26.4  42.2    16.4    13.2    5.3  

Furniture and related products

   (6.5  7.1    1.1    3.3    (5.8

Miscellaneous

   (4.5  1.9    0.8    2.6    0.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total expansion/contraction

   (8.4  8.5    4.6    3.8    1.4  

(1)Preliminary figures.
(2)Percent change reflects constant 2008 pesos.

Source: INEGI.

According to preliminary figures, the manufacturing sector expanded by 1.4% in real terms during 2013 as compared to 2012. In total, eight manufacturing sectors contracted and thirteen sectors grew in 2013, each as compared to 2012.

Tourism

Mexico’s tourism sector expanded in 2013. As compared to 2012, this sector experienced increases in the following areas:

revenues from international travelers (including both tourists and visitors who enter and leave the country on the same day) totaled U.S. $13.8 billion, an 8.5% increase from 2012;

revenues from tourists to the interior (as opposed to border cities) totaled U.S. $11.2 billion, a 9.6% increase from 2012;

the number of tourists to the interior totaled 14.1 million, a 3.5% increase from 2012;

the average expenditure per tourist to the interior totaled U.S. $790.00, a 5.9% increase from 2012;

expenditures by Mexican tourists abroad totaled U.S. $5.7 billion, a 9.3% increase from 2012; and

expenditures by Mexicans traveling abroad (which include both tourists and one-day visitors) totaled U.S. $9.1 billion, a 7.2% increase from 2012.

In total, the Mexican tourism sector recorded a U.S. $4.8 billion surplus in the balance of payments in 2013, an 11.1% increase from the U.S. $4.3 billion surplus recorded in 2012.

As compared to the first month of 2013, the tourism sector experienced increases or decreases in the following areas for the first month of 2014:

revenues from international travelers totaled U.S. $1.4 billion, a 17.4% increase from the same period in 2013;

revenues from tourists to the interior of Mexico totaled U.S. $1.2 billion, a 21.3% increase from the same period in 2013;

the number of tourists to the interior of Mexico totaled 1.4 million, an 18.4% increase from the same period in 2013;

the average expenditure per tourist to the interior of Mexico totaled U.S. $850.10, a 2.5% increase from the same period in 2013;

expenditures by Mexican tourists abroad totaled U.S. $461.6 million, a 0.2% decrease from the same period in 2013; and

expenditures by Mexicans traveling abroad totaled U.S. $722.4 million, a 1.5% increase from the same period in 2013.

In total, the Mexican tourism sector recorded a U.S. $719.3 million surplus in the balance of payments during the first month of 2014, a 39.4% increase from the U.S. $516.0 million surplus recorded during the same period in 2013.

Financial System

20112013 and 20122014 Monetary Programs

Consistent withThe principal objective of Mexico’s 2013 monetary program for 2011, Mexico’s monetary program for 2012 has as its principal objective the achievement ofis to achieve an inflation rate not higher than itsat or below the permanent target of 3.0% (+/-1.0%)., which is intended to stabilize the purchasing power of the Mexican peso. Mexico’s monetary programsprogram for 2011 and 2012 have been2013 is comprised of the following elements:features:

 

the announcement of an explicit, multi-year plan to control inflation;

 

a systematican analysis of the economy and inflationary pressures;

 

  

a description of the instrumentstools used byBanco de México to achieve its objectives; and

 

a communication policy of communication that promotes transparency, credibility and effective monetary policy.

policy; and

During 2011,

a provision that encourages/promotes the expedient adoption of monetary policy measures, which are meant to reduce inflation and prevent its effects on the formation of prices.

At December 31, 2013, the monetary base totaled Ps. 917.9 billion, an 8.5% nominal increase from the level of Ps. 846.0 billion at December 31, 2012, due to a higher demand for bills and coins held by the public. At March 26, 2014, the monetary base totaled Ps. 845.6 billion, a 7.9% nominal decrease from the level of Ps. 917.9 billion at December 31, 2013, due to a higher demand for bills and coins held by the public.

The M1 money supply (i.e.,of Mexico is the sum of bills and coins held by the public, plus checking accounts denominated in local currency and foreign currency, plus interest-bearing deposits denominated in pesos and

operated by debit cards, plus savings and loan deposits) increased by 9.4% in real terms, as compared with growth of 8.8% in real terms in 2010. This increase in growth was driven by a 7.0% increase in real terms in the amount of bills and coins held by the public and a 13.4% increase in real terms in checking account deposits denominated in pesos.

As of February 29, 2012, thedeposits. At January 31, 2014, Mexico’s M1 money supply was 8.2%8.1% greater in real terms than the level as of February 28, 2011.at January 31, 2013. The amount of bills and coins held by the public as of February 29, 2012 was 7.4%5.8% greater in real terms than as of February 28, 2011, whileat January 31, 2013. In addition, the aggregate amount of checking account deposits denominated in pesos as of February 29, 2012 was 8.9%8.2% greater in real terms than as of February 28, 2011.at the same date in 2013.

As of DecemberAt January 31, 2011,2014, financial savings in Mexico—defined as the difference between the monetary aggregate M4 and bills and coins held by the public, public—were 12.2%3.9% greater in real terms than financial savings as of Decemberat January 31, 2010. Savings generated by Mexican residents were 7.7% greater in real terms and savings generated by non-residents were 49.9% greater in real terms than their respective levels as of December 31, 2010.

As of February 29, 2012, financial savings were 12.8% greater in real terms than financial savings as of February 28, 2011.2013. Savings generated by Mexican residents increased by 7.5%4.6% and savings generated by non-residents increased by 55.8%0.9%, in each caseboth in real terms, and as compared to their respective levels asthe same period of February 28, 2011.

2013.

As of December 31, 2011, the monetary base totaled Ps. 763.5 billion, a 10.1% nominal increase from the level of Ps. 693.4 billion as of December 31, 2010. The net domestic credit ofBanco de México registered a negative balance of Ps. 1,318.1 billion as of December 31, 2011, as compared to a negative balance of Ps. 796.2 billion as of December 31, 2010. The 65.5% increase in the negative balance was primarily due to an increase in the net international assets ofBanco de México that exceeded the increase in the monetary base during the year.

As of April 17, 2012, the monetary base totaled Ps. 762.2 billion, a 0.2% nominal decrease from the level of Ps. 763.5 billion at December 31, 2011.

The minimum overnight funding rate, which isBanco de México’sprimary monetary policy instrument, was reduced from 8.25% to 7.75% on January 16, 2009, to 7.50% on February 20, 2009, to 6.75% on March 20, 2009, to 6.00% on April 17, 2009, to 5.25% on May 15, 2009, to 4.75% on June 19, 2009 and to 4.50% on July 17, 2009. As of April 20, 2012, the minimum overnight funding rate remained at 4.50%.

Banking Supervision and Support

As of December 31, 2011, the total amount of past-due loans of commercial banks was Ps. 60.9 billion, as compared to Ps. 49.7 billion as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2011, the total loan portfolio of the banking system was 11.5% greater in real terms than the total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2010. The past-due loan ratio of commercial banks was 2.5% as of December 31, 2011, as compared to a ratio of 2.3% as of December 31, 2010. The amount of loan loss reserves held by commercial banks totaled Ps. 115.5 billion as of December 31, 2011, as compared to Ps. 99.4 billion as of December 31, 2010. At this level, commercial banks had reserves covering 189.6% of their past-due loans as of December 31, 2011, exceeding the minimum reserve level of 45%.

As of February 29, 2012, the total amount of past-due loans of commercial banks was Ps. 60.6 billion, as compared to Ps. 60.9 billion as of December 31, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, the total loan portfolio of the banking system was 1.3% less in real terms than the total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2011. The past-due loan ratio of commercial banks was 2.5% as of February 29, 2012, unchanged from the ratio as of December 31, 2011. The amount of loan loss reserves held by commercial banks totaled Ps. 115.8 billion as of February 29, 2012, as compared to Ps. 115.5 billion as of December 31, 2011. At this level, commercial banks had reserves covering 190.9% of their past-due loans as of February 29, 2012, exceeding the minimum reserve level of 45%.

The Securities MarketMarkets

The BMVMexican Stock Exchange is the only authorized stock exchange involved in the listing and trading of equity and debt securities in Mexico. Upon the consummation of the initial public offering of its shares on June 18, 2008, the BMVMexican Stock Exchange was transformed from asociedad anónima de capital variable (private company) to asociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable (public company). In connection with the initial public offering of shares, certain of the former stockholders of the BMVMexican Stock Exchange (banks and brokerage houses) created a control trust into which they deposited more than 50% of the issued and outstanding shares of the BMV,Mexican Stock Exchange, for purposes of voting such shares in the future as a single block. Both debt and equity securities are listed and traded on the BMV,Mexican Stock Exchange, including stocks and bonds of private sector corporations, equity certificates or shares issued by banks, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, certificates of deposit, Mexican Government debt and special hedging instruments linked to the dollar. Currently, institutional investors are the most active participants in the BMV,Mexican Stock Exchange, although retail investors also play a role in the market. The Mexican equity market is one of Latin America’s largest in terms of market capitalization, but it remains relatively small and illiquid compared to major world markets.

The Mexican Stock Exchange publishes theÍndice de Precios y Cotizaciones (Stock Market Index, or IPC)Index) based on a group of the 35 most actively traded shares. As of December 31, 2011,

At March 26, 2014, the IPCStock Market Index stood at 37,077.5239,761 points, representing a 3.8% nominal decrease from the level of 38,550.8 points as of December 31, 2010. As of April 20, 2012, the IPC stood at 39,354.86 points, representing a 6.1% nominal6.9% increase from the level at December 31, 2013.

Banking Supervision and Support

At December 31, 2013, the total loan portfolio of the banking system was 6.2% greater in real terms than the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2012.

According to preliminary figures, at December 31, 2013, the total amount of past-due commercial bank loans (excluding those banks undergoing government intervention and those in special situations) was Ps. 102.5 billion, as compared to Ps. 70.0 billion at December 31, 2012. Moreover, the past-due loan ratio of commercial banks was 3.4%, as compared to a ratio of 2.5% at December 30, 2011.31, 2012. The amount of loan loss reserves held by commercial banks at December 31, 2013 totaled Ps. 149.9 billion, as compared to Ps. 129.0 billion at December 31, 2012. As a result, commercial banks had reserves covering 146.3% of their past-due loans, well exceeding the minimum reserve level of 45%.

At January 31, 2014, the total loan portfolio of the banking system was 1.1% lower in real terms than the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2013.

According to preliminary figures, at January 31, 2014, the total amount of past-due commercial bank loans (excluding those banks undergoing government intervention and those in special situations) was Ps. 92.3 billion, as compared to Ps. 91.2 billion at December 31, 2013. Moreover, the past-due loan ratio of commercial banks was 3.1%, as compared to a ratio of 3.1% at December 31, 2013. The amount of loan loss reserves held by

commercial banks at January 31, 2014 totaled Ps. 127.6 billion, as compared to Ps. 127.3 billion at December 31, 2013. As a result, commercial banks had reserves covering 138.2% of their past-due loans, well exceeding the minimum reserve level of 45%.

External Sector of the Economy

Foreign Trade

According to preliminary figures, during 2011,2013, Mexico registered a trade deficit of U.S. $1.2$1.0 billion, as compared withto a trade deficit of U.S. $3.0 billion$45.8 million for 2010. Merchandisethe same period of 2012. In particular, exports increased or decreased as follows, each as compared to 2012:

petroleum exports decreased by 6.3%;

non-petroleum exports increased by 17.2% during 2011,4.0%;

merchandise exports increased by 2.6%, to U.S. $349.7$380.2 billion, as compared to U.S. $298.5$370.8 billion for 2010. During 2011, petroleum exports increased by 35.3%, while non-petroleum exports increased by 14.2%, each as compared with the petroleumduring 2012; and non-petroleum export totals, respectively, in 2010. Exports of manufactured goods, which represented 79.7% of total merchandise exports, increased by 13.4% during 2011, as compared with

exports of manufactured goods during 2010.

(which represented 82.7% of total merchandise exports) increased by 4.2%.

According to preliminary figures, during 2011,2013, total imports increased by 16.4%2.8%, to U.S. $350.8$381.2 billion, as compared to U.S. $301.5$370.8 billion for 2010. During 2011, 2012. In particular, imports increased as follows, each compared to 2012:

imports of intermediate goods increased by 14.9%, 2.5%;

imports of capital goods increased by 15.8%1.3%; and

imports of consumer goods increased by 25.0%, in each case as compared to 2010.

5.6%.

According to preliminary figures, during the first two monthsmonth of 2012,2014, Mexico registered a trade surplusdeficit of U.S. $0.2$3.2 billion, as compared withto a trade surplusdeficit of U.S. $0.5$2.9 billion for the same period of 2011. Merchandise2013. In particular, exports increased or decreased as follows, each as compared to the first month of 2013:

petroleum exports decreased by 15.8%;

non-petroleum exports increased by 13.5% during the first two months of 2012,2.0%;

merchandise exports decreased by 1.0%, to U.S. $57.2$27.0 billion, as compared to U.S. $50.4$27.3 billion for the same period of 2011. During the first two months of 2012, petroleum exports increased by 14.1%, while non-petroleum exports increased by 13.3%, each as compared with the petroleum and non-petroleum export totals, respectively, in the same period of 2011. Exports of manufactured goods, which represented 78.9% of total merchandise exports, increased by 12.9% during the first two monthsmonth of 2012, as compared with 2013; and

exports of manufactured goods during the same period(which represented 80.6% of 2011.

total merchandise exports) increased by 1.5%.

According to preliminary figures, during the first two monthsmonth of 2012,2014, total imports increased by 14.1%0.3%, to U.S. $57.1$30.2 billion, as compared to U.S. $50.0$30.1 billion for the same period of 2011. During2013. In particular, imports increased or decreased as follows, each as compared to the first two monthsmonth of 2012, 2013:

imports of intermediate goods increased by 14.1%, 0.8%;

imports of capital goods increaseddecreased by 19.5%2.4%; and

imports of consumer goods increaseddecreased by 11.2%, in each case as compared to the same period of 2011.

0.2%.

Balance of International Payments

According to preliminary figures, during 2011,2013, Mexico’s current account registered a deficit of 0.8%1.8% of GDP, or U.S. $8.8$22.3 billion, as compared to a deficit of U.S. $3.1$14.8 billion or 0.3% of GDP, for 2010.2012. The capital account registered

a surplus of U.S. $52.7$58.6 billion in 2011,during 2013, as compared to a surplus of U.S. $41.0$54.2 billion in 2010.during 2012. Foreign investment in Mexico totaled U.S. $44.8$56.2 billion during 2011, as compared to U.S. $44.0 billion during 2010,2013 and was composed of direct foreign investment inflows totaling U.S. $19.4$35.2 billion and net foreign portfolio investment inflows (including securities placed abroad) totaling U.S. $25.4$21.0 billion.

At February 28, 2014,Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico

According to preliminary figures, during the year ended December 31, 2011, foreign direct investment in Mexico recorded with theRegistro NacionalBanco de Inversiones ExtranjerasMéxico (National Foreign Investments Registry)’s international reserves totaled approximately U.S. $19.4$180.9 billion, an increase of U.S. $1.2 billion as compared withto international reserves at February 21, 2014. At February 28, 2014,Banco de México’s net international assets totaled U.S. $20.2$183.8 billion, during 2010. Of the total foreign direct investment registered during 2011, excluding investment in securities, 44.1% was directed to manufacturing, 18.0% to financial services, 9.5% to commerce, 6.4% to construction, 5.7% to mass media, 4.3% to mining, 3.7% to real estate and rental services, 1.3% to transportation, 0.1% to agriculture, livestock, fishing and forestry, (1.1)% to electricity and water, and 8.0% to other services. By countryan increase of origin, during 2011, 55.0% cameU.S. $1.1 billion from the United States (not including Puerto Rico), 6.7% from the Netherlands, 15.0% from Spain, 3.4% from Canada, 0.2% from the United Kingdom, 1.2% from Germany, 0.5% from Luxembourg, 6.3% from Switzerland, 3.4% from Japan, 0.5% from Singapore and 7.8% from other countries.

amount at February 21, 2014.

Exchange Controls and Foreign Exchange Rates

Since December 22, 1994, the Mexican Government has maintained a floating exchange rate policy, withBanco de México intervening in the foreign exchange market from time to time to minimize volatility and ensure an orderly market, as described below. The Mexican Government has also promoted market-based mechanisms for stabilizing the exchange rate, such as over-the-counter forward and options contracts between banks and their clients in Mexico, and authorization of peso futures trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. In addition, since October 1996,Banco de México has permitted foreign financial institutions to open peso-denominated accounts and to borrow and lend pesos (subject to general restrictions on conducting banking activities in Mexico).

During 2011,2013, the average peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate was Ps. 12.435412.7724 = U.S. $1.00. During the first three monthsmonth of 2012,2014, the average peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate was Ps. 12.985913.223 = U.S. $1.00. The peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate announced byBanco de México on April 20, 2012March 27, 2014 (which took effect on the second business day thereafter) was Ps. 13.117113.084 = U.S. $1.00.

On February 22, 2010, theComisión de Cambios(Foreign Exchange Commission) announced that it would conduct auctions of options, which would allow the holder of the option to sell dollars toBanco de México. This system is designed to allow Mexico to gradually accumulate international reserves without affecting the exchange rate.

Pursuant to the auction policy and commencing in February 2010,Banco de México began conducting an auction on the last business day of each month, in which participating financial institutions can purchase options to sell dollars toBanco de México. These options remained exercisable on any day of the month immediately following the auction. The holders of these options were able to sell dollars toBanco de México at thetipo de cambio interbancario de referencia(reference interbank exchange rate, “FIX”) as determined byBanco de México on the business day immediately prior to the exercise of the option, so long as the applicable rate did not exceed the observed average of the FIX over the 20 business days preceding the exercise date. The amount of options available for auction each month was U.S. $600 million. On November 29, 2011, the Foreign Exchange Commission announced that, effective immediately, it was suspending temporarily this auction mechanism. From February 26, 2010 to November 30, 2011,Banco de México auctioned an aggregate of U.S. $12.6 billion in options through this mechanism, and, as of November 30, 2011,Banco de México had purchased an aggregate of U.S. $9.1 billion from holders upon the exercise of these options.

On November 29, 2011, the Foreign Exchange Commission announced thatBanco de México will conduct an auction of U.S. $400 million each business day, at a peso/dollar exchange rate that is, at a minimum, 2% weaker than the peso/dollar exchange rate on the previous business day. The auction will result in a sale only when the exchange rate depreciates more than 2% as compared with the previous day’s exchange rate. This tool has been used in the past to promote liquidity in the foreign exchange market. From November 30, 2011 through April 20, 2012, there were no bids submitted in these daily auctions.

As of December 30, 2011, Mexico’s international reserves totaled U.S. $142.5 billion, an increase of U.S. $28.9 billion as compared to international reserves as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2011, the net international assets ofBanco de México totaled U.S. $149.2 billion, an increase of U.S. $28.6 billion as compared to net international assets as of December 31, 2010.

As of April 13, 2012, Mexico’s international reserves totaled U.S. $151.5 billion, an increase of U.S. $9.0 billion as compared to international reserves as of December 30, 2011. As of April 13, 2012, the net international assets ofBanco de México totaled U.S. $157.3 billion, an increase of U.S. $8.1 billion as compared to net international assets as of December 31, 2011.

Public Finance

Fiscal Policy

A rational allocation of public expenditure and the augmentation of revenue have been important components of the Mexican Government’s economic stabilization strategy, which has two fundamental objectives: (1) to reduce the poverty rate and (2) to increase the rate of economic growth and employment.

The Mexican Government’s principal fiscal policy objectives in order to promote economic growth and employment opportunity are to:

reduce the costs and risks associated with investment in Mexico;

improve the ability of Mexican businesses to compete in global markets; and

reduce the costs of goods and services to the consumer.

To achieve these objectives, the Mexican Government plans to:

strengthen the rule of law and improve public security;

simplify the administration of the Mexican tax system and facilitate the consistent application of the various tax laws;

improve the efficiency of the public sector through enhanced coordination among government entities and increased transparency of public spending, in order to permit increased spending on social development and infrastructure;

further develop the Mexican equity and debt markets;

improve the pension system for public sector workers;

consolidate macroeconomic stability through fiscal discipline and the effective use of petroleum resources, as well as the utilization of transparent and efficient budgetary procedures;

improve the regulation (or pursue deregulation) of various sectors of the economy, as appropriate; and

continue trade liberalization policies.

ThePrograma Nacional de Financiamiento aldel Desarrollo 2008-2012 2013-2018 (National Program to Finance Development 2008-2012, “PRONAFIDE”)2013-2018, or PRONAFIDE), which was announced on May 27, 2008,December 16, 2013, establishes the Mexican GovernmentGovernment’s fiscal policy goals. These goals consistent with those described above, including increased spending oninclude securing sufficient fiscal resources to strengthen social infrastructure and economic development and greater investment in infrastructure, while maintaining a stable and responsible approach to public finances.productivity. To this end, the PRONAFIDE has outlined the following specific objectives:

 

to strengthen the framework of fiscal responsibility to ensure a responsible and efficient fiscal policy, including a balanced budget and a prudent management of debt, each of which are core components of Mexico’s development strategy, with the goals of reducing the historical balance of the public sector borrowing requirement and strengthening the mechanisms to carry out counter-cyclical policies;

1.promote economic development and macroeconomic stability;

 

to continue to simplify the Mexican taxation system, seeking additional mechanisms to facilitate compliance with tax obligations and reduce tax evasion, in order to improve tax collection;

2.improve the financial system to generate additional resources and to transform it into a simpler and more progressive system;

 

to ensure the proper implementation of public finance reforms, in particular the Flat Rate Business Tax, in order to increase non-oil tax revenues and reduce the volatility of total government revenues;

3.increase spending efficiency to promote growth, development and productivity, while still maintaining accountability;

 

4.encourage the notion of “fiscal federalism,” so that states and municipalities can also reach and maintain balanced public financing;

to improve the allocation and use of expenditures by evaluating their results, based on greater transparency and accountability, including the implementation of an evaluation system for expenditure programs, integrating the Mexican Government’s accounting systems at all three levels of government and giving priority in the allocation of expenditures to sectors and programs that produce better results; and

5.foster inclusion, education, competition and transparency in the financial, insurance and pension systems, thereby increasing their access and coverage while retaining their effectiveness and reliability; and

6.extend credit to development banks that facilitate access to financial services in strategic sectors of the economy and that place particular emphasis on the private sector.

to promote the development of local financial markets and achieve savings in the financial costs of the public sector through the active management of public debt, while maintaining a level of risk consistent with the natural evolution of public finances and the development of local financial markets.

20112013 Budget and Fiscal Results

On September 8, 2010,December 7, 2012, the President of Mexico submitted the proposedLey de Ingresos de la Federación para el Ejercicio Fiscal de 20112013 (Federal Revenue Law for 2011,2013, or 2011the 2013 Revenue Law) and the proposedPresupuesto de Egresos de la Federación para el Ejercicio Fiscal de 20112013 (Federal Expenditure Budget for 2011,2013, or 2011the 2013 Expenditure Budget) to the Mexican Congress for approval. The 2013 Revenue Law and the 2013 Expenditure Budget were approved on OctoberDecember 13, 2012 and December 20, 20102012, respectively, and November 15, 2010,were published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on December 17, 2012 and December 27, 2012, respectively (together, the 20112013 Budget).

The 2011 Budget, as approved by the Mexican Congress, provided for a public sector budget deficit, excluding physical investment by PEMEX, of Ps. 70.2 billion, or 0.5% of GDP. Including physical investment by PEMEX, the 2011 Budget provided for a public sector budget deficit of 2.5% of GDP.

AccordingIn nominal pesos and according to preliminary figures, during 2011, the public sector balance registered a deficit of Ps. 355.5375.3 billion in nominal pesos,(including physical investment expenditures by PEMEX) during 2013, or 2.5%2.3% of GDP, as compared to a GDP. This

deficit was Ps. 403.2 billion during the same period of Ps. 370.5 billion in nominal pesos, or 2.8% of GDP, registered during 2010. Excluding physical investments by PEMEX, the2012. The public sector balance registered a deficit of Ps. 88.346.7 billion or 0.6% of GDP, during 2011,(excluding physical investment expenditures by PEMEX), as compared to a Ps. 91.2 billion deficit registered for the same period of 2012.

In nominal pesos and according to preliminary figures, including physical investment expenditures by PEMEX, the total primary balance registered a deficit of Ps. 102.059.3 billion or 0.8% of GDP, during 2010.2013, 39.2% lower in nominal terms than 2012.

In 2011,According to preliminary figures, during 2013, public sector budgetary revenues totaledamounted to Ps. 3,269.63,803.7 billion in nominal pesos, a 6.8% increase4.3% more in real terms as compared to 2010. This increase is mainly explained by a 9.3% increase in oil2012. During 2013, revenues and a 5.7% increase in non-oil tax revenues,have increased or decreased as follows, each in real terms and as compared to 2010.2012:

crude oil revenues increased by 2.6%;

non-oil tax revenues increased by 4.4%; and

PEMEX’s non-tax revenues (as a percentage of total public sector budgetary revenues) decreased by 0.5 percentage points, to 12.7%, as compared to approximately 13.2% in 2012.

According to preliminary figures, during 2011, crude oil revenues increased by 9.3% in real annual terms as compared to 2010, primarily as a result of a 39.3% increase in the price of crude oil exports, which was partially offset by a 1.0% decrease in crude oil production. Non-oil tax revenues increased by 5.7% in real terms, mainly due to various fiscal reforms that came into effect during 2010 and the overall economic recovery.

According to preliminary figures, during 2011,2013, net public sector budgetary expenditures increased by 5.3%2.8% in real terms as compared to 2010. During 2011,2012. Net public sector financing costsbudgetary programmable expenditures (excluding physical investment by PEMEX) increased by 3.6%3.3% in real terms as compared to 2010, mainly2012. During 2013, the financial cost of public sector debt decreased by 2.5% in real terms as a resultcompared to the same period of increased borrowings to finance the approved public deficit. Public sector financing costs as a percentage2012.

As of GDP declined from 2.0% of GDP in 2010 to 1.9% in 2011.

At December 31, 2011, 2013:

the Fondo de Estabilización de los Ingresos Petroleros (Oil Revenues Stabilization Fund) totaled Ps. 33.8 billion;

theFondo de Estabilización de los Ingresos de las Entidades Federativas (Federal Entities Revenue Stabilization Fund) totaled Ps. 20.3 billion;

theFondo de Estabilización para la Inversión en Infraestructura de Petróleos Mexicanos (Petróleos Mexicanos’ Infrastructure Investment Stabilization Fund) totaled Ps. 1.6 billion; and

theFondo de Estabilización de los Ingresos Petroleros (Oil Revenues Stabilization Fund) totaled Ps. 11.0 billion, theFondo de Estabilización de los Ingresos de las Entidades Federativas (Federal Entities Revenue Stabilization Fund) totaled Ps. 5.6 billion, theFondo de Estabilización para la Inversión en Infraestructura de Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX Infrastructure Investment Stabilization Fund) totaled Ps. 1.3 billion and theFondo de Apoyo para la Reestructura de Pensiones (Fund to Support Pension Restructuring) totaled Ps. 27.015.4 billion.

2012 Budget

On September 8, 2011,

2014 Budget

On September 8, 2013, the President of Mexico submitted the proposedLey de Ingresos de la Federación para el Ejercicio Fiscal de 2014 (Federal Revenue Law for 2014, or the 2014 Revenue Law) and the proposedPresupuesto de Egresos de la Federación para el Ejercicio Fiscal de 2014 (Federal Expenditure Budget for 2014, or the 2014 Expenditure Budget) to the Mexican Congress for its approval. The 2014 Revenue Law and the 2014 Expenditure Budget were approved on October 31, 2013 and November 14, 2013, and were published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on November 20, 2013 and December 3, 2013, respectively. We refer to these two bills together as Mexico’s 2014 budget (the 2014 Budget).

The 2014 Budget allows ministries and budget-controlled agencies to request additional expenditures to the extent that oil revenues earned by PEMEX exceed the projected oil revenues set forth in the 2014 Budget. In addition, the 2014 Budget provides that the executive branch, acting through the SHCP, is authorized to approve, if certain conditions are met, additional expenditures requested by certain ministries or budget-controlled agencies in the event that these entities realize revenues greater than those projected in the 2014 Budget.

The 2014 Budget, as adopted by the Mexican Congress, provides for a public sector budget deficit excluding physical investments by PEMEX of 1.5% of GDP. Including PEMEX’s investment program, the 2014

Budget provides for a public sector budget deficit of 3.5% of GDP. The 2014 Budget contemplates public sector budgetary revenues totaling Ps. 3,816.7 billion, a 2.1% increase in real terms as compared to public sector budgetary revenues estimated for Mexico’s 2013 budget (the 2013 Budget). This is based on an assumed weighted average Mexican crude oil export price of U.S. $85.00 per barrel and an estimated volume of oil exports of 1,170 thousand barrels per day. Oil revenues are estimated at Ps. 1,256.7 billion in nominal pesos, a 1.9% decrease in real terms as compared to the estimated amount for the 2013 Budget. In addition, approved non-oil revenues are Ps. 2,551.0 billion, a 4.2% increase as compared to the estimated amount for the 2013 Budget. Finally, projected non-oil tax revenue also increased by 3.7% in real terms as compared to the amount approved for the 2013 Budget.

Mexico’s 2014 Budget provides for a total of Ps. 4,079.6 billion in expenditures (excluding estimated physical investment expenditures by PEMEX totaling Ps. 357.5 billion), a 9.2% increase in real terms as compared to the amount approved in the 2013 Expenditure Budget.

The 2014 Budget also authorizes the Mexican Government to incur net domestic debt in the amount of Ps. 570 billion in nominal pesos, or 3.2% of GDP. The 2014 Budget also authorizes the Mexican Government to incur an additional U.S. $10 billion in external indebtedness, which includes financing from international financial organizations.

The table below sets forth the budgetary results for 2012, as well as for 2013. It also sets forth the assumptions and targets underlying Mexico’s 2013 Budget and 2014 Budget.

2012 and 2013 Results; 2013 Budget and 2014 Budget Assumptions and Targets

   2012
Results
  2013
Budget(1)
  2013
Results(1)
  2014
Budget(6)
 

Real GDP growth (%)

   3.9  3.5  1.1  3.9

Increase in the national consumer price index (%)

   3.6  3.0  4.0  3.0

Average export price of Mexican oil mix (U.S. $/barrel)

  $101.96   $86.00(3)  $98.46   $85.00(4) 

Current account deficit as % of GDP

   (1.2)%   n.a.    (1.8)%   n.a.  

Average exchange rate (Ps./$1.00)

   13.2    12.9    12.8    12.9  

Average rate on 28-dayCetes (%)

   4.2  4.6  3.8  4.0

Public sector balance as % of GDP(5)

   (2.6)%   (2.0)%   (2.3)%   (3.5)% 

Primary balance as % of GDP(5)

   (0.6)%   0.1  (0.4)%   n.a.  

n.a.= Not available.
(1)2013 Budget figures represent budgetary estimates, based on the economic assumptions contained in the Criterios Generales de Política Económica (General Economic Policy Guidelines) for 2013 and in thePrograma Económico 2013(Economic Program for 2013). These figures do not reflect actual results for the year or updated estimates of Mexico’s 2013 economic results.
(2)Preliminary figures.
(3)The Mexican Government entered into hedging agreements to protect against the effects of a potential decline in oil prices with respect to the level that was assumed in the 2013 Revenue Law. Therefore, the approved expenditures level should not be affected if the weighted average price of crude oil exported by PEMEX for the year falls below the price assumed in the 2013 Budget.
(4)The Mexican Government entered into hedging agreements to protect against the effects of a potential decline in oil prices with respect to the level that was assumed in the 2014 Revenue Law. Therefore, the approved expenditures level should not be affected if the weighted average price of crude oil exported by PEMEX for the year falls below the price assumed in the 2014 Budget.
(5)Includes the effect of expenditures related to the issuance of bonds pursuant to reforms to theLey del Instituto de IngresosSeguridad y Servicios Sociales de la Federación para el Ejercicio Fiscal de 2012los Trabajadores del Estado (Federal Revenue Law(Law of the Institute for 2012,Social Security and Social Services of Government Workers, or ISSSTE Law) and recognition as public sector debt of certain PIDIREGAS obligations, as discussed under “Public Finance—Revenues and Expenditures—General” in the 2012 Revenue Law)Form 18-K.
(6)2014 Budget figures represent budgetary estimates, based on the economic assumptions contained in theCriterios Generales de Política Económica 2014 (General Economic Policy Guidelines for 2014) and thePresupuesto de Egresos de la Federación para el Ejercicio Fiscal de 2012 (Federal Expenditure Budget for 2012, the 2012 Expenditure Budget) to the Mexican Congress for approval. The 2012 Revenue Law and the 2012 Expenditure Budget were approved on October 27, 2011 and November 15, 2011, respectively, and were published in the Official Gazette on November 16, 2011 and December 12, 2011, respectively (together,Programa Económico 2014 (Economic Program for 2014), as modified by the 2012 Budget).

The 20122014 Budget as approvedadopted by the Mexican Congress, provides for a public sector budget deficit, excluding physical investment by PEMEX, of Ps. 95.2 billion, or 0.4% of GDP. Including physical investment by PEMEX, the 2012 Budget provides for a public sector budget deficit of 2.4% of GDP.

The 2012 Budget, as approved by the Mexican Congress, contemplates public sector budgetary revenues totaling Ps. 3,310.5 billion, a 4.7% increase in real terms as compared to public sector budgetary revenues estimated for the 2011 Revenue Law. The Mexican Government estimates that expenditures will total Ps. 3,405.7 billion during 2012 (excluding estimated physical investment expenditures by PEMEX totaling Ps. 301.2 billion), a 4.4% increase in real terms as compared to the amount approved in 2011 Expenditure Budget.

The 2012 Budget authorizes the Mexican Government to increase expenditures for social development by 6.4%, national security by 9.4% and science, technology and innovation by 18.6%, each as compared to the amounts budgeted for 2011.

The preliminary results for 2010 and 2011, as well as the budget assumptions and targets for the 2011 Budget and the 2012 Budget, are presented below.

2010 and 2011 Results;

2011 Budget and 2012 Budget Assumptions and Targets

   2010
Results(1)
  2011 
Budget(5)
  2011 
Results(2)
  2012 
Budget(6)
 

Real GDP growth (%)

   5.5  3.8  3.9  3.3

Increase in the national consumer price index (%)

   3.6  3.0  3.8  3.0

Average export price of Mexican oil mix
(U.S.$/barrel)

  U.S.  $72.3 U.S.  $65.40(3)  U.S.  $101.0 U.S.  $84.9

Current account deficit as % of GDP

   0.5  n.a.    0.8  n.a.  

Average exchange rate (Ps./U.S.$1.00)

   12.6    12.9    12.4    12.8  

Average rate on 28-dayCetes (%)

   4.4  5.0  4.2  4.6  

Public sector balance as % of GDP(4)

   (0.8%)   (0.5%)   (0.6%)   (0.4%) 

Primary balance as % of GDP(4)

   1.2  n.a.    1.3  n.a.  

Note: n.a. = not available.

(1)Preliminary. This note only applies to real GDP growth and figures expressed as a percentage of GDP, which are subject to periodic revision.Congress.
(2)Preliminary.
(3)The Mexican Government entered into agreements to hedge oil prices in order to isolate the 2011 Budget and the 2012 Budget from the effect of reductions in the price of oil with respect to the level that was assumed in the Federal Revenue Law for 2011 and the Federal 2012 Revenue Law.
(4)Excluding physical investments by PEMEX.
(5)2011 Budget figures represent budgetary estimates, based on the economic assumptions contained in theCriterios Generales de Política Económica 2011(General Economic Policy Guidelines for 2011) published in September 2010 and in thePrograma Económico 2011 (Economic Program for 2011) published in November 2010, as modified by the 2011 Budget adopted by the Mexican Congress.
(6)2012 Budget figures represent budgetary estimates, based on the economic assumptions contained in theCriterios Generales de Política Económica 2012(General Economic Policy Guidelines for 2012) published in September 2011 and in thePrograma Económico 2012 (Economic Program for 2012) published in November 2011, as modified by the 2012 Budget adopted by the Mexican Congress.

Source: Ministry of Finance and Public Credit.

Public Debt

Internal Public Debt

Internal debt of

Source: SHCP.

Public Debt

Mexico’s external public debt policy for 2013 was intended to provide the Mexican Government with flexibility to finance its stated needs, while also accounting for market volatility and unforeseen developments.

The policy also sought to maintain costs and risks at stable levels. Going forward, Mexico’s public debt policy will continue the practice of relying on local markets as the main source of funding for the Mexican Government, which will be supplemented by external financing from the U.S., Europe and Japan. Mexico’s principal objectives in connection with its external financing include:

improving the terms and conditions of Mexico’s external liabilities;

strengthening and diversifying Mexico’s investor base, with specific consideration to Mexico’s continued presence in the most influential international markets;

strengthening Mexico’s benchmark bonds; and

maintaining a constant relationship with international investors in order to ensure transparency and to promote investment in Mexico.

Internal Public Debt

The Mexican Government’s “net internal debt” includes only the internal portion of indebtedness incurred directly by the Mexican Government,Banco de México’s general account balance (which was positive as of December 31, 2010, indicating monies owed to the Mexican Government) and the assets of theFondo del Sistema de Ahorro Para el Retiro(Retirement Savings System Fund). NetIn addition, “net internal debt includesdebt” is comprised ofCetesand other securities sold to the public in primary auctions but doesfor new issuances (primary auctions), butdoes not include any debt allocated toBanco de Méxicofor its use in regulating liquidity (Regulación Monetaria) (regulating the money supply). See footnote 1 to the table captioned “Internal Debt of the Mexican Government” below. Internal debtIt also does not include the debt ofby theInstituto para la Protección al Ahorro Bancario (Bank(Bank Savings Protection Institute, or IPAB) or the debt of budget-controlled or administratively controlledadministratively-controlled agencies. At December 31, 2010, all of the Government’s internal debt was denominated in inflation-indexedUnidades de Inversión(which we refer to as UDIs) or pesos and was payable in pesos.

Over the last decade,two decades, the Mexican Government has pursued an internalactively sought to increase its average debt strategy aimed at lengthening the average maturity of its debt in order to reduce its refinancing risk. To further this goal,date. Accordingly, the Mexican Government has in recent years introducedissued new debt instruments ofbearing longer maturities.maturities than those previously issued. In the last quarter of 1999,doing so, the Mexican Government offered forhopes to mitigate any risk associated with the first time 10-year securities denominated in UDIs and 30-year UDI-indexed bonds, and subsequently began offering three-year, five-year, seven-year, 10-year, 20-year and 30-year fixed-rate peso-denominated bonds. However, sincerefinancing of its internal public debt. This has had the first quartereffect of 2008, 20-year UDI-denominated bonds are no longer offered.

Through the issuance of these securities, the Mexican Government has establishedestablishing a long-dated benchmark yield curve. The issuance of these instruments hascurve (the line that plots interest rates across different contract lengths for bonds having equal credit quality). These issuances have also encouraged:

encouraged long-term investments in the increased use of long-term fixed ratefollowing areas: (1) fixed-rate contracts;

the issuance of long-term (2) peso-denominated securities by Mexican companies;

(3) Mexican financial hedging products; and (4) the developmentuse of long-term financial hedging productssavings in Mexico; and

the potential to direct long-term savings toward the financing of long-term investment projects.

During the last quarter of 2008, in response to the global economic crisis, the Mexican Government increased the amount of 182-dayCetes and 364-dayCetes that it auctioned and decreased the amount of long-term bonds that it auctioned, in order to stabilize domestic financial markets.

According to preliminary figures, at December 31, 2011,2013, the Mexican Government’s net internal debt totaled Ps. 3,893.9 billion, an 11.2% increase in nominal terms as compared to Ps. 3,501.1 billion outstanding at December 31, 2012. This debt figure includes the Ps. 165.5 billion liability associated with social security under the ISSSTE Law, as described under “The Economy—Employment and Labor” in the 2012 Form 18-K. The net internal debt of the Mexican Governmentpublic sector, on the other hand, totaled Ps. 3,129.54,231.3 billion (including liabilities associated with the public sector pension reform law of Ps. 171.9 billion), an 11.4%according to preliminary figures, a 12.2% increase in nominal terms as compared to the Ps. 2,808.93,770.0 billion outstanding at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2011, according2012.

According to preliminary figures, at December 31, 2013, the Mexican Government’s gross internal debt of the Mexican Government totaled Ps. 3,197.74,063.2 billion, a 10.7%13.6% increase in nominal terms as compared to the Ps. 2,888.33,575.3 billion of gross internal debt outstanding at December 31, 2010.2012. Of the total gross internal debt of the Mexican Government at December 31, 2011,2013, Ps. 349.8480.6 billion represented short-term debt, as compared to Ps. 396.7 billion at the end of 2012, and Ps. 2,847.93,582.6 billion represented long-term debt, as compared to Ps. 294.43,178.6 billion at the end of short-term2012. The gross internal debt andof the public sector, on the other hand, totaled Ps. 2,593.94,408.9 billion of long-term debt at December 31, 2010.2013 according to preliminary figures, a 14.2% increase in nominal terms as compared to Ps. 3,861.1 billion outstanding at December 31, 2012. For purposes of this “Public Debt” section, public sector debt consists of the long-term indebtedness incurred directly by the Mexican Government, the long-term indebtedness incurred by budget-controlled agencies, the long-term indebtedness incurred directly or guaranteed by administratively controlled agencies (including, but not limited to, national development banks) and the short-term debt of the public sector. It does not include private sector debt guaranteed by the Mexican Government, unless and until the Mexican Government is called upon to make payment under its guaranty. Also for purposes of this “Public Debt” section, long-term debt is defined as all debt

with maturities of one year or more from the date of issue, while short-term debt is defined as all debt with maturities of less than one year from the date of issue.

TheAccording to preliminary figures, at December 31, 2013, the Mexican Government’s financing costs on its internal debt totaled Ps. 193.4222.8 billion, during 2011, or 1.3% of GDP, anrepresenting a 7.4% nominal increase of 7.4% as compared to 2010. During 2011,its financing costs of Ps. 207.6 billion, or 1.4% of GDP, during the same period of 2012.

As of December 31, 2013, the average maturity of the Mexican Government’s internal debt increased by 0.41decreased to 7.9 years from 7.20 yearsas compared to the average maturity at December 31, 2010 to 7.61 years at December 31, 2011.

At December 31, 2011, the gross internal debt of the public sector including the recognition of PIDIREGAS totaled Ps. 3,446.8 billion, as compared to Ps. 3,080.9 billion outstanding at December 31, 2010.2012.

The following table summarizes the net internal public debt of the Mexican Government as ofat each of the dates indicated.

Net Internal Debt of the Mexican Government(1)

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011(2)  2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013(2) 
 (in billions of pesos, except percentages)  (in billions of pesos, except percentages) 

Gross Debt

                        

Government Securities

  Ps.  1,569.9    93.9  Ps.  1,795.8    94.7  Ps.  2,021.2    84.2  Ps.  2,379.3    88.0  Ps.  2,553.9    88.4  Ps.  2,882.8    90.2 Ps. 2,021.2   84.2 Ps. 2,379.3   88.0 Ps. 2,553.9   88.4 Ps. 2,882.8   90.2 Ps. 3,257.8   91.1 Ps. 3,734.1   91.9

Cetes

  346.0    20.7    340.5    18.0    357.1    14.9    498.8    18.5    394.0    13.6    456.6    14.3   357.1   14.9   498.8   18.5   394.0   13.6   456.6   14.3   531.3   14.9   635.6   15.6  

Floating Rate Bonds

  359.6    21.5    325.0    17.1    243.6    10.1    243.5    9.0    183.1    6.3    202.5    6.3   243.6   10.1   243.5   9.0   183.1   6.3   202.5   6.3   200.4   5.6   216.6   5.3  

Inflation-Linked Bonds

  155.3    9.3    235.3    12.4    334.9    14.0    430.6    15.9    647.2    22.4    779.1    24.4   334.9   13.9   430.6   15.9   530.1   18.4   642.1   20.1   747.2   20.9   888.7   21.9  

Fixed Rate Bonds

  709.0    42.4    895.1    47.2    1,085.6    45.2    1,206.5    44.6    1,446.8    50.1    1,581.6    49.5   1,085.6   45.2   1,206.5   44.6   1,446.8   50.1   1,581.6   49.5   1,777.9   49.7   1,989.6   49.0  

Other

  102.9    6.2    100.6    5.3    380.1    15.8    323.4    12.0    334.4    11.6    314.9    9.9  

STRIPS of Udibonos

                                 1.0   0.0   3.6   0.1  

Other(3)

 380.1   15.8   323.4   12.0   334.4   11.6   314.9   9.8   317.6   8.9   329.1   8.1  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Gross Debt

  Ps.  1,672.8    100.0  Ps.  1,896.3    100.0  Ps.  2,401.3    100.0  Ps.  2,702.8    100.0  Ps.  2,888.3    100  Ps.  3,197.7    100 Ps. 2,401.3   100.0 Ps. 2,702.8   100.0 Ps. 2,888.3   100.0 Ps. 3,197.7   100.0 Ps. 3,575.3   100.0 Ps. 4,063.2   100.0
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net Debt

                        

Financial Assets(3)

  (125.7   (107.9   (68.6   (231.4   (79.4   (68.2 

Financial Assets(4)

 (68.6  (231.4  (79.4  (85.6  (74.2  (169.3 
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total Net Debt

  Ps.  1,547.1     Ps.  1,788.3     Ps.  2,332.7     Ps.  2,471.3     Ps.  2,808.9     Ps.  3,129.5    Ps. 2,332.7    Ps. 2,471.3    Ps. 2,808.9    Ps. 3,112.1    Ps. 3,501.1    Ps. 3,893.9   
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Gross Internal Debt/GDP

   15.6   16.1   19.8   21.4   20.9   21.3  19.8  21.4  21.0  20.7  22.3  23.9

Net Internal Debt/GDP

   14.4   15.2   19.2   19.6   20.3   20.9  19.1  19.5  20.4  20.2  21.8  22.9

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

n.a. = not available.

(1)Internal debt figures do not include securities sold byBanco de México in open-market operations to manage liquidity levels pursuant toRegulación Monetaria, (none of which amounted to approximately Ps. 720.7 billion atare outstanding since December 30, 2011.Regulación Monetaria31, 2011). This is because this does not increase the Mexican Government’s overall level of internal debt, becausedebt.Banco de México must reimburse the Mexican Government for any allocated debt thatBanco de México sells into the secondary market and that is presented to the Mexican Government for payment. IfBanco de México undertakes extensive sales of allocated debt in the secondary market, however,Regulación Monetaria this can result in thean elevated level of outstanding internal debt being higher thanas compared to the Mexican Government’s figure for net internal debt.debt.
(2)Preliminary.Preliminary figures.
(3)Includes Ps. 193.9 billion for 2009, Ps. 193.0 billion for 2010, Ps. 171.9 billion for 2011, Ps. 169.0 billion for 2012 and Ps. 165.5 billion at December 31, 2013 in liabilities associated with social security under the ISSSTE Law, as described under “The Economy—Employment and Labor” in the 2012 Form 18-K.
(4)Includes the net balance denominated(denominated in pesos of theCuenta General de la Tesoría de la Federación (General Accountpesos) of the Federal Treasury) withTreasury’s General Account inBanco de México.

Source: Ministry of Finance and Public Credit.SHCP.

External Public Debt

The total external debt of the“External public sector debt” consists of the external portion of the long-term indebtedness incurred directly by the Mexican Government, the external long-term indebtedness incurred by budget-controlled agencies, the external long-term indebtedness incurred directly or guaranteed by administratively controlledadministratively-controlled agencies (including but not limited to national development banks) and the short-term external debt of the public sector. Private sector debt guaranteed by the Mexican Government is not included, unless and until the Mexican Government is called upon to make payment under the applicable guaranty. External“External public debtdebt” does not include, among other things, repurchase obligations ofBanco de México with the International Monetary Fund (which we refer to as the IMF) or the debt of the IPAB.Fund.

According to preliminary figures, at December 31, 2011, Mexico’s2013, outstanding gross public sector gross external debt totaled U.S. $116.4$134.4 billion, as compared toan approximate U.S. $110.4$8.7 billion increase from the U.S. $125.7 billion outstanding at December 31, 2010.the end of 2012. Of this amount, U.S. $113.7$130.9 billion represented long-term debt and U.S. $2.8$3.5 billion represented short-term debt.

According to preliminary figures, Overall, total public debt (gross external debt plus net internal public sector debt) of Mexico at December 31, 2011 represented approximately 32.6%31.4% of nominal GDP, 1.6an increase of 3.8 percentage point higher than at December 31, 2010.

According to preliminary figures, at December 31, 2011, commercial banks held approximately 17.0%points from the end of Mexico’s total public sector external debt; multilateral and bilateral creditors (excluding the IMF) held approximately 23.6%; bondholders (including commercial banks holding bonds issued in debt exchange transactions) held approximately 59.2%; and other creditors held the remaining 0.3%.2012.

The following tables set forth a summary of the external public debt of Mexico, as well as a breakdown of such debt by currency.

Summary of External Public Debt(1)

By Type

 

  Long-Term
Direct Debt of
the Mexican
Government
  Long-Term
Debt of Budget-
Controlled
Agencies
  Other Long-
Term Public
Debt(2)
  Total Long-Term
Debt
  Total Short-
Term Debt
  Total Long- and
Short-Term Debt
 
  (in millions of U.S. dollars) 

At December 31,

      

2006

 U.S.  $39,330   U.S.  $7,046   U.S.  $7,545   U.S.  $53,921   U.S.  $845   U.S.  $54,766  

2007

  40,114    7,745    6,576    54,435    920    55,355  

2008

  39,997    9,782    5,885    55,664    1,275    56,939  

2009

  47,350    41,048    6,202    94,600    1,754    96,354  

2010(4)

  56,168    45,536    6,385    108,089    2,339    110,428  

2011(4)

  60,590    47,436    5,625    113,651    2,769    116,420  
   Long-Term
Direct Debt
of the Mexican
Government
   Long-Term
Debt of Budget-
Controlled
Agencies
   Other
Long-Term
Public
Debt(2)
   Total Long-
Term Debt
   Total Short-
Term Debt
   Total Long-
and Short-
Term Debt
 
   (in millions of U.S. dollars) 

At December 31,

            

2008

  U.S. $39,997    U.S. $9,782    U.S. $5,885    U.S. $55,664    U.S. $1,275    U.S. $56,939  

2009

   47,350     41,048     6,202     94,600     1,754     96,354  

2010

   56,168     45,536     6,385     108,089     2,339     110,428  

2011

   60,590     47,436     5,625     113,651     2,769     116,420  

2012

   66,912     50,063     5,626     122,601     3,125     125,726  

2013(3)

   71,817     53,358     5,734     130,909     3,527     134,436  

By Currency(3)(4)

 

 At December 31,  At December 31, 
 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011(4)  2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013(3) 
 (in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)  (in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages) 

U.S. dollars

  50,760    92.7  44,309    80.0  47,851    84.0  77,919    80.9  90,882    82.3  97,048    83.4 U.S. $47,851   84.1 U.S. $77,919   80.9 U.S. $90,882   82.3 U.S. $97,048   83.4 U.S. $105,836   84.2 U.S. $111,647   83.1

Japanese yen

  1,006    1.8    1,157    2.1    1,095    1.9    4,541    4.7    6,864    6.2    6,793    5.8   1,095   1.9   4,541   4.7   6,864   6.2   6,793   5.8   6,847   5.4   5,519   4.1  

Pounds sterling

  91    0.2    1,040    1.9    687    1.2    1,981    2.1    1,920    1.7    1,906    1.6  

Pounds

 687   1.2   1,981   2.1   1,920   1.7   1,906   1.6   1,993   1.6   1,369   1.0  

Swiss francs

  175    0.3    423    0.8    410    0.7    716    0.7    953    0.9    910    0.8   410   0.7   716   0.7   953   0.9   910   0.8   961   0.8   969   0.7  

Others

  2,734    5.0    8,426    15.2    6,896    12.1    11,197    11.6    9,809    8.9    9,763    8.4   6,896   12.1   11,197   11.6   9,809   8.9   9,763   8.4   10,089   8.0   14,932   11.1  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  54,766    100.0  55,355    100.0  56,939    100.0  96,354    100.0  110,428    100.0  116,420    100.0 U.S. $56,939   100.0 U.S. $96,354   100.0 U.S. $110,428   100.0 U.S. $116,420   100.0 U.S. $125,726   100.0 U.S. $134,436   100.0
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)ExternalAny external debt denominated in foreign currencies other than U.S. dollars has been translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rates atfor each of the dates indicated. External public debt does not includeinclude: (a) any repurchase obligations ofBanco de México with the IMF (none of theseInternational Monetary Fund (however, none were outstanding at December 31, 2011),as of November 30, 2013) or (b) external borrowingsloans made by the public sector after December 31, 2011 or (c) loans from the Commodity Credit Corporation to public sector Mexican banks. External debt is presented herein on a “gross” basis and includes any external obligations of the public sector at their full outstanding face or principal amount. For certain informational and statistical purposes, Mexico sometimes reports its external public sector debt on a “net” or “economic” basis, which is calculated as the gross debt net ofsubtracted by certain financial assets held abroad. These financial assets include Mexicannon-cancelled public sector external debt that is held by public sector entities but that has not been cancelled.entities.
(2)Includes development banks’ debt and the debt of development banks and other administratively controlledadministratively-controlled agencies whose finances are consolidated with those of the Mexican Government.
(3)Preliminary figures.
(4)Adjusted to reflect the effect of currency swaps.
(4)Preliminary.

Source: Ministry of Finance and Public Credit.SHCP.

Recent Securities Offerings

On January 6, 2012,10, 2013, Mexico issued U.S. $2 billion of its 3.625% Global Notes due 2022. The notes were issued under Mexico’s U.S. $80 billion Global Medium Term Notes program at a yield to maturity of 3.706%. On March 8, 2012, Mexico issued U.S. $2$1.5 billion of its 4.750% Global Notes due 2044. The notes were issued under Mexico’s U.S. $80$110 billion Global Medium TermMedium-Term Notes programProgram at a yield to maturity of 4.839%4.194%.

On February 6, 2013, Mexico issuedUnidades de Inversión (or UDI) 225 million of stripped coupons from principal and UDI 41 million of stripped coupons from interest. The transaction was the second to be carried out under a program implemented on November 14, 2012, which was designed to simultaneously auction stripped coupons from principal and from interest of 30-yearUDIbonos.

On April 22, 2013, Mexico issued, in the European market, €1.6 billion of its 2.75% Global Notes due 2023. The transaction was part of a tender offer in which holders of a certain series of Mexico’s outstanding Euro-denominated debt securities were allowed to offer those debt securities for cash considerations. The notes were issued under Mexico’s U.S. $110 billion Medium-Term Notes Program and gave investors a yield to maturity of 2.81%.

On August 8, 2013, Mexico issued ¥48.6 billion of notes due 2016, ¥15.0 billion of notes due 2018 and ¥17.0 billion of notes due 2019. These notes were placed in the Japanese public market and bear interest at 1.16%, 1.39% and 1.54%, respectively.

On August 30, 2013, Mexico issued Ps. 25 billion of domestic fixed-rate bonds due 2018. These bonds were placed in the Mexican market and provide investors with a yield to maturity of 5.49%.

On October 2, 2013, Mexico issued U.S. $3.9 billion of its 4.00% Global Notes due 2023. The transaction was part of a tender offer in which holders of a certain series of Mexico’s outstanding U.S. dollar-denominated debt securities were allowed to offer those debt securities for cash considerations. The notes were issued under Mexico’s U.S. $110 billion Medium-Term Notes Program and gave investors a yield to maturity of 4.06%.

On January 21, 2014, Mexico issued U.S. $1.0 billion of its 3.50% Global Notes due 2021 and U.S. $3.0 billion of its 5.55% Global Notes due 2045. The transaction was part of a tender offer in which holders of a certain series of Mexico’s outstanding U.S. dollar-denominated debt securities were allowed to offer those debt securities for cash considerations. The notes were issued under Mexico’s U.S. $110 billion Medium-Term Notes Program.

On March 19, 2014, Mexico issued £1.0 billion of its 5.625% Global Notes due 2114. The notes were issued under Mexico’s U.S. $110 billion Medium-Term Notes Program at a yield to maturity of 5.75%.

On April 9, 2014, Mexico issued €1.0 billion of its 2.375% Global Notes due 2021 and €1.0 billion of its 3.625% Global Notes due 2029. The notes were issued under Mexico’s U.S. $110 billion Medium-Term Notes Program.

Legal and Political Reforms

Governmental Accounting

Amendments to theLey General de Contabilidad Gubernamental(General Law on Governmental Accounting) became effective on January 1, 2013. These amendments are designed to improve transparency in government spending by, among other things, including a requirement that state, local and municipal governments publish periodic information regarding any received federal funds. In addition, the law provides for the creation and maintenance of web sites that grant public access to financial information for all levels of government, including the Government.

Public Administration

On January 3, 2013, amendments to theLey Orgánica de la Administración Pública Federal (Federal Public Administration Organic Law) became effective. These amendments included, among others, the following reforms:

 

theSecretaría de Gobernación (Ministry of the Interior) was granted the authority to coordinate the efforts of the other ministries in order to accomplish the President of Mexico’s directives and policies, and to convene cabinet meetings, subject to approval by the President of Mexico;

theSecretaría de Seguridad Pública (Ministry of Public Security) was dissolved, and the authority to coordinate and supervise programs pertaining to public security, the federal police, the federal penitentiary system, victims assistance, crime prevention and criminal data and intelligence was transferred to the Ministry of the Interior;

the name of theSecretaría de la Reforma Agraria (Ministry of Agrarian Reform) was changed toSecretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano (Ministry of Agrarian, Territorial and Urban Development);

the SFP was dissolved, and the following responsibilities were conferred to the SHCP: (1) internal accountability; (2) internal management control systems; (3) public service development; (4) public leases; (5) acquisitions and projects; (6) human resources and salary policies; and (7) federal real-estate policies with respect to the administration of federal property; and

the Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (Ministry of Social Development) was granted authority to coordinate and supervise programs and policies to: (1) prevent and reduce poverty; (2) to promote children’s rights, elderly rights, family unity; and (3) develop stronger social infrastructures.

The dissolution of the SFP and the transfer of its authority to the SHCP are subject to the approval of a bill that will amend the Mexican Constitution and create an independent entity to carry out anticorruption activities previously conducted by the SFP. The Mexican Congress will be expected to revise the internal accountability and management control systems so that they are consistent with the level of authority and responsibility conferred upon the new entity. Prior to the approval of this bill, the SFP will continue to act under its existing mandate.

Amparo Law

A new Amparo Law became effective on April 3, 2013, replacing the prior amparo statute. This Amparo Law was designed to provide Mexican Constitutional relief to individuals and corporations against various types of governmental actions, including administrative and judicial actions. This new law enables individuals to file legal challenges against such actions and provides injunctive relief in certain instances. The new Amparo Law also: (1) broadens the scope of those persons that may seek protection under the law; (2) grants general effects to rulings issued under amparo claims in certain circumstances; and (3) restricts injunctive relief where the social harm outweighs the benefit to the plaintiff. Finally, the enactment of the new law also seeks to reinforce the court system by attempting to limit judicial contradictions.

Insurance and Finance Institutions

A newLey de Instituciones de Seguros y Fianzas (Insurance and Finance Institutions Act) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on April 4, 2013. Unlike prior legislation which regulated insurance and bonding companies separately, the Insurance and Finance Institutions Act instead jointly governs the incorporation and operation of insurance and bonding companies. In addition, this law is expected to: (1) further bring Mexican insurance legislation in line with international standards; (2) implement certain new capital requirements; and (3) provide for new insurance products.

Tax Reform

On December 11, 2013, a fiscal reform decree amending and supplementing certain provisions of theLey del Impuesto al Valor Agregado(Value Added Tax Law), the IEPS Law and theLey del Impuestos sobre la Renta(the Income Tax Law), and eliminating theLey del Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única(the Corporate Tax Law) and theLey del Impuesto a los Depósitos en Efectivo(Cash Deposit Tax Law), was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. This decree, which became effective on January 1, 2014, includes, among others, the following features:

the prior 11% value added tax (VAT) rate that applied to transactions conducted along the border was raised to 16%, thereby matching the general VAT rate applicable throughout Mexico;

a green tax on the sale of fossil fuels was introduced, amounting to, in certain instances, Ps. 39.80 per ton of carbon-dioxide produced;

an excise tax of 8% now applies to items designated as “junk food,” as well as a fee of one peso per liter for the sale and import of sugary drinks; and

certain products and services that were previously VAT exempt, such as chewing gum, pets, pet food and certain public passenger transportation services, will now be subject to the VAT at the general rate of 16%.

In addition, as part of this fiscal reform, a new Income Tax Law was approved which includes, among others, the following features:

a 30% tax rate applies to individuals with annual incomes up to Ps. 750,000;

a 32% tax rate applies to individuals with annual incomes between Ps. 750,000 and Ps. 1.0 million;

a 34% tax rate applies to individuals with annual incomes between Ps. 1.0 million and Ps. 3.0 million;

a 35% tax rate applies to individuals with annual incomes of more than Ps. 3.0 million;

the régimen de pequeños contribuyentes (small taxpayers regime) was eliminated and therégimen de consolidación fiscal (tax consolidation regime) is to be eliminated as well; and

a new incorporation regime for affiliated taxpayers was introduced, applicable only to those individuals who have engaged in business activities involving the sale of goods or the rendering of services that do not require a professional degree or whose annual income does not exceed Ps. 2.0 million.

Financial Reform

On January 9, 2014, a financial reform amending over 34 statutes and establishing a newLey para Regular a las Agrupaciones Financieras(Financial Groups Law) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. The financial reform has four core goals: (1) to foster competition among financial services providers; (2) to strengthen development banks; (3) to create new products and services that are better suited for financial services customers; and (4) to ensure both soundness and prudence in the financial sector.

In order to achieve these goals, this financial reform has, among others, the following features:

TheComisión Nacional para la Protección y Defensa de los Usuarios de Servicios Financieros(National Commission for the Protection of Users of Financial Services, or CONDUSEF) has been given additional authority through increased financial institution transparency and enhanced enforcement capabilities. For example, the CONDUSEF is now able to issue and publish recommendations to financial institutions.

The process by which people switch banks and make modifications between accounts has been simplified and conditional sales are now prohibited.

Development banks are mandated to improve their operations and to favor the extension of credit. They are also encouraged to develop new programs and financial products that broaden access to financing opportunities.

Financial authorities have been granted additional capabilities to periodically evaluate bank performance and the overextension of credit, and coordination mechanisms between financial authorities have been reinforced. Further, the legal framework governing the acceptance and execution of loan guarantees, risk and credit cost reductions has been further simplified.

Bankruptcy procedures have been modified, including through the institution of a joint concurso mercantil procedure for entities of the same corporate group and the creation of a new liquidation procedure for credit institutions that is supervised by IPAB.

Access to Information and Transparency Reform

On February 7, 2014, a reform to the Mexican Constitution intended to improve access to information and transparency was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. This reform includes among others, the following features:

the increase of access rights to information, including information provided by individuals, companies, entities and organizations;

the establishment of the IFAI as a separate legal entity with technical and managerial autonomy and budgetary self-sufficiency;

the clarification of the bases by which autonomous local bodies in all 32 states have the right to access public information and to protect personal data;

the ability of the IFAI to obtain and resolve information requests relating to political parties, trade unions, trusts and any individual or entity that receives public funding; and

the determination that IFAI resolutions shall be final and undisputable, and that the IFAI will also refrain from answering those petitions that contain certain information that could affect national security.

In addition to the above, on February 20, 2014, theReglamento Interior del Instituto Federal de Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos (Internal Regulation of the Federal Institute for Access to Informationand Data Protection) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation which aims to establish the structure, functions and operations of theInstituto Federal de Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos (Federal Institute for Access to Information and Data Protection, or the IFAI).

Political and Electoral Reform

On February 10, 2014, a political and electoral reform to the Mexican Constitution was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. Although secondary legislation is pending, this political and electoral reform includes, among others, the following features:

The President of Mexico shall be entitled to create government programs and common agendas with any of the parties represented in the Mexican Congress;

The President of Mexico’s term will commence on October 1 instead of December 1;

TheConsejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política Social (National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy, or CONEVAL) will be established as a separate legal entity with technical and managerial autonomy and budgetary self-sufficiency. CONEVAL will be responsible for measuring poverty levels and evaluating the programs, goals, objectives and actions relating to social development policy in Mexico;

TheProcuraduría General de la República (Federal Attorney General’s Office) will become theFiscalía General de la República (National Prosecutor’s Office) and will be established as a separate legal entity with technical and managerial autonomy and budgetary self-sufficiency;

The creation of theInstituto Nacional Electoral (National Electoral Institute), which will perform the functions of the currentInstituto Federal Electoral (Federal Electoral Institute) and which will be established as a separate legal entity with technical and managerial autonomy and budgetary self-sufficiency. The National Electoral Institute will be responsible for organizing federal and local elections and determining the means of election and organization of self-governed electoral federal bodies;

Federal deputies will be eligible for immediate reelection for up to four term periods. Similarly, members of the Senate will be eligible for immediate reelection for two additional term periods;

Local congresses will be allowed to establish consecutive reelection terms for mayoral, alderman or trustee posts for an additional term period, provided that such term period is no longer than three years; and

The total federal electoral votes needed for national parties to maintain its registration status in federal elections will be increased to 3%.

Penal System Reform

On March 5, 2014, the Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales (the National Criminal Procedure Code) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. This reform includes, among others, the following features:

instead of following different criminal codes in each state, the new code will provide uniform rules for criminal procedure throughout the country;

the criminal procedure will follow all of the principles recognized in the Mexican Constitution and in international treaties to promote a more expedited process; and

the increased protection of victims and their rights, the presumption of innocence and the respect for due process.

Item 4A.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

 

Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

General

We earn income from:

 

export sales, which consist of sales of crude oil and condensates, petroleum products and petrochemical products;

 

domestic sales, which consist of sales of natural gas, petroleum products (such as gasoline, diesel fuel and LPG) and petrochemical products; and

 

other sources, including financial and investment income.

income and insurance revenues.

Our operating expenses include:

 

costscost of sales, including the cost of purchases of imported petroleum and other products, depreciation and amortization, salaries, wages and benefits, a portion of the net cost of the reserve for employee benefits for the period, the variation of inventories, maintenance, and exploration and non-successful drilling expenses;

 

transportation and distribution expenses (including a portion of the net cost of employee benefits for the reserve for employee benefits)period); and

 

administrative expenses (including a portion of the net cost of employee benefits for the reserve for employee benefits)period).

Our income is affected by a number of factors, including:

 

changes in international prices of crude oil, petroleum products and petrochemical products, which are denominated in U.S. dollars, and domestic prices of petroleum products, which are denominated in pesos;

 

the type and volume of crude oil produced and exported;

 

the type and volume of natural gas produced, processed and sold;

 

the results of development and exploration activities;

 

the amount of taxes and duties that the Mexican Congress imposes on us;

 

fluctuations in the peso-U.S. dollar exchange rate; and

 

Mexican and global economic conditions, including the levels of international interest rates.

Overview

Overview

In2013 was an important year for us, as we witnessed the past years, PEMEX has undergoneapproval of significant changes to the Mexican Constitution pursuant to the Energy Reform Decree that will enable the Mexican Government to use a major transformation duevariety of contractual arrangements to several factors, perhapscarry out upstream and downstream activities, taking into account geological, geographic, economic and commercial considerations. We believe that the most relevantchanges contemplated by the Energy Reform Decree will allow for a transparent and clear division of which isroles among participants in the evolutionMexican hydrocarbons industry, including Petróleos Mexicanos. Petróleos Mexicanos will transform into a productive state-owned company focused on value creation that will act as the Mexican Government’s operator in the Mexican hydrocarbons industry. The Ministry of Energy, together with the company’s business plan towards value creation. PEMEX has established a multiannual business plan that includes both operationalNHC and investment programs, which have broughtthe SHCP, will administer the ownership of Mexico’s hydrocarbon resources. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform” for more information about the stabilization of national crude oil production and a historic proved reserves replacement rate abovechanges to be implemented in connection with the 100% benchmark as of January 1, 2012. This reserves replacement rate safeguards the future of the Mexican petroleum industry.

Through the 2008 Energy Reform framework, PEMEX, along with the leading drilling companies, has continuedDecree.

With respect to innovate in order to develop more efficient and profitable strategies in both the drilling and exploitation of the reserves located in Chicontepec. These efforts have resulted in significant increases in production in that region. Also, in 2011, the first round of Integrated E&P Contracts was awarded; through these contracts, PEMEX seeks to increase its execution and production capacity, as well as gather technological expertise. Moreover, additional rounds of Integrated E&P Contracts for geologically complex fields are planned, through which PEMEX hopes to fulfill its commitment to guaranteeing the future of the nation’s energy supply.

In addition, in accordance with the business model’s emphasis on the creation of value, PEMEX has implemented operational and administrative improvement programs in refining, and has aligned its supply processes with industry best practices. Taking into account the market’s and industry’s development, PEMEX has reestablished business practices that not only generate benefits for the company, but also for the national industry and Mexico, such as joint ventures and collaborations in the secondary petrochemical sector, as well as in natural gas transportation. Furthermore, at the organizational level, PEMEX has created initiatives which aim to make better use of its human capital, so as to increase the productivity and dynamism of its labor force.

PEMEX still faces important challenges in order to sustain value creation within the company, such as increasing the hydrocarbons production platform, consolidating the reserves replacement rate, pursuingour exploration and production activities, we experienced a decline in heavy and extra-light crude oil production in 2013 due to the progression into the transition zone of non-conventional depositsthe oil-water contact and the natural decline in production of hydrocarbons,certain wells located in the Cantarell business unit and in the Caparroso-Pijije-Escuintle and Sen projects. This decline was offset in part by the increase in light crude oil production resulting from the addition of new fields. Most of these new fields are located in the Southeastern basins, which we expect will continue to be one of our most productive regions. Natural gas production decreased during 2013 due to lower volumes from the Veracruz, Delta del Grijalva, Crudo Ligero Marino, Ixtal-Manik and Costero Terrestre projects.

Our exploration activities in 2013 led to the discovery of additional shale formations and the drilling of successful deepwater wells, including the Maximino-1 well in the Área Perdido region, the deepest deepwater well in Mexico and one of the deepest in the world. In addition, we made progress in the development phase of the Lakach project, which is expected to be Mexico’s first productive deepwater field. Lakach is a non-associated natural gas field with 103.2 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves. We also continued to apply technological innovation in field development, such as drilling 36 horizontal wells in the ATG business unit in 2013 in order to maximize reservoir contact. Although horizontal wells represented only 1.7% of the total number of operating wells in the ATG business unit, production from these wells represented 14.0% of the business unit’s total production. In these ways, we have continued innovating and developing new exploitation strategies in one of Mexico’s most promising, yet geologically complex, regions.

During 2013, we also made significant progress in connection with our downstream activities. We have been able to identify areas of opportunity to increase value creation and gradually improve the safety and reliability of our facilities and operational and administrative processes. With respect to our refining activities, we increased the amount of light crude oil processed in our refining system, and thereby decreased the proportion of heavy crude oil relative to total crude oil processed, in order to reduce the overproduction of residual products. In 2013, the reconfiguration of the Minatitlán refinery continued to generate positive results and contributed to the overall performance of our refining activities, which included higher production of light and medium distillates, such as gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, and lower fuel oil production. Although our refining capacity usage improved, from 71.6% in 2012 to 73.1% in 2013, our refining margins were negative primarily due to the fluctuation of prices of crude oil and its derivatives in the international markets. We will continue to work to identify and address weaknesses in our refining processes in order to generate greater value.

With respect to our petrochemicals operations, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos approved a joint venture with Mexichem, pursuant to which Pemex-Petrochemicals contributed its vinyl chloride and ethylene plants at the Pajaritos petrochemical complex. We expect that the joint venture with Mexichem will lead to more effective integrated operations and increase production of vinyl chloride, which is used to make polyvinyl chloride (also known as PVC). In 2013, Pemex-Petrochemicals’ total annual production increased by 972 thousand tons of petrochemical products as compared to 2012, mainly driven by increased production in the aromatics chain. In addition, natural gas processing increased by 22 million cubic feet per day in 2013 due to a higher supply of natural gas from our exploration and production activities, which in turn led to a 1.8% increase in dry gas production. In these ways, we sought to strengthen our industrial processes in order to increase output and enhance value creation.

Our financial results for 2013 reflect both the individual challenges that we faced as well as that of geologically-complex fields, such as Chicontepec, deep waters and shale gas, where an important part ofthose affecting the Mexicanglobal oil and gas industry future lies. Finally, the design and implementation of new schemes oriented towards capturing economic benefits from the downstream businesses are critical to generating greater value along the business chain.

industry. We have reported significant losses in recent years. In 2010, we reported a net loss of Ps. 46.5 billion as compared to a net loss of Ps. 94.4170.1 billion in 2009. The reduction in our net loss in 2010 was primarily2013 mainly due to higher crude oil, natural gasdecreases in sales and petroleum products prices,other revenues, net, as well as an increase in revenues from IEPS tax credits, which resulted from a higher negative IEPS tax rate in 2010. Nonetheless, we continued to report significant losses during 2010, mainly as a result of the high taxes and duties paid to the Mexican Government. In 2011, we reported a netforeign exchange loss of Ps. 91.5 billion. The loss was primarily due to the high taxes and duties we paid, and to exchange losses resulting fromcaused by the depreciation of the peso. We cannot predict whether we will report income orpeso against the U.S. dollar and the euro in 2013 as compared to 2012. Lower prices of crude oil and its derivatives, combined with an increase in general expenses, had a lossparticularly strong impact on our financial results for the 2012 fiscal year.

In 2010,We believe that the changes set forth in the Energy Reform Decree will offer us an unprecedented opportunity to improve our equity decreased by Ps. 46.0 billion, from negative Ps. 65.3 billion asoperational and financial results in the near future because the conversion of December 31, 2009 to negative Ps. 111.3 billion as of December 31, 2010. In 2011, our equity decreased by Ps. 82.6 billion, to negative Ps. 193.9 billion as of December 31, 2011. These decreases were primarily due to the net losses recorded in 2010 and 2011. We note that under theLey de Concursos Mercantiles(Commercial Bankruptcy Law of Mexico), decentralized public entities such as Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities cannot be subjectinto a productive state-owned company is expected to a bankruptcy proceeding. In addition, our current financing agreements do not include financial covenants or events of default that would be triggered as a result of our having negative equity. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.allow us to emphasize value creation.

Moreover, we believe that the new domestic industrial landscape will foster greater interaction and collaboration among the participants along the entire value chain, which will progressively lead to more frequent exchanges of technology and know-how and ultimately create greater efficiency and profitability for us.

Critical Accounting Policies

Some of our accounting policies require the application of judgmentestimates, judgments and assumptions by management which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of our financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates.this report. By their nature, these estimates, judgments and assumptions are subject to a degree of uncertainty and are based on: our historical experience; terms of existing contracts; management’s view of trends in the oil and gas industry, both internationally and within Mexico; economic factors in Mexico; and information from outside sources. We believe that the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect management’s judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements according to IFRS, and could potentially impact our financial results and future financial performance.

Transition to IFRS

Beginning with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, Mexican issuers There can be no assurance that disclose information through the BMVactual results do not differ from these estimates. These policies are required to prepare financial statementsmore fully described in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. We will begin presenting our financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, with an official IFRS “adoption date” of January 1, 2012 and a “transition date” to IFRS of January 1, 2011. We will report our quarterly information under IFRS to the BMV during 2012. For further details on the adoption of IFRS, please see Note 203 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Successful Efforts Method of Oil and Gas Accounting

We apply the successful efforts method for the exploration and production of crude oil and gas activities, considering the criteria mentioned in IFRS 6, “Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources,” in relation to the recognition of exploration and drilling assets. Costs of development wells and related plant, property and equipment involved in the exploitation of oil and gas accounting. This accounting principle requiresare recorded as part of the cost of assets. The costs of exploratory wells in areas that development costs, includinghave not yet been designated as containing proved reserves are recorded as intangible assets until it is determined whether such reserves are commercially viable. Otherwise, the costs of drilling an exploratory wellswell are charged to exploration expense. Other expenditures on exploration are charged to exploration expense, as incurred.

Depreciation and exploratory-type stratigraphic testamortization of capitalized costs associated with wells are initially capitalizedbased on the estimated commercial life of the field to which the well corresponds, taking into account the relationship between the field’s production levels for the period and if proved reserves are not discovered, the capitalized costs are later charged to expenses. The capitalized costs of wells and related equipment are amortized over proved developed reserves, as of the related oilbeginning of the year and gas reserves are extracted. Our reservesas updated on a quarterly basis for new development investments.

Reserves estimates are determined in accordance with earth science and petroleum engineering principles and practices pursuant to Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X, and can vary as a result of changes in such factors as forecasted oil and gas prices, reservoir performance and developments in oil field technology.

Downward revision of our reserves estimates can result in: (a) higher depreciation and depletion expense per barrel in future periods; (b) an immediate write-down of an asset’s book value in accordance with accounting rules for the impairment of properties; or (c) changes in our accrual of the asset retirement obligation. An impairment of oil and gas producing fixed assets will result if the downward revisions are so significant that the estimated future cash flows from the remaining reserves in the field are insufficient to recover the unamortized capitalized costs. Conversely, if the oil and gas reserves quantities are revised upward, our per barrel depreciation and depletion expense will be lower.

The application of successful efforts accounting can also cause material fluctuations between periods in exploration expenseexpenses if drilling results are different than expected or if we change our exploration and development plans. The determination that exploratory drilling was unsuccessful in finding economically producible reserves requires the immediate expensing of previously capitalized drilling costs. We make periodic assessments of the amounts included within fixedintangible assets to determine whether capitalization is initially appropriate and should continue. Exploration wells capitalized beyond 12 months are subject to additional judgment

evaluation as to whether the facts and circumstances have changed, and therefore whether the conditions described in clauses (a) and (b) below no longer apply. Exploration wells more than 12 months old are expensed unless: (a) (i) they are in an area requiring major capital expenditures before production can begin, (ii) commercially productive quantities of reserves have been found, and (iii) they are subject to further exploration or appraisal activity, in that either drilling of additional exploratory wells is underway or firmly planned for the near future; or (b) proved reserves are identified within 12 months following the completion of exploratory drilling.

Environmental Remediation and Asset Retirement Obligations

We alsoare required to make judgments and estimates in recording liabilities for environmental cleanup and asset retirement obligations. In accordance with applicable legal requirements and accounting practices, we recognize an environmental liability when the cash outflows are probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. We account for disbursements related to the conservation of the environment that are linked to revenue from current or future operations as costs or assets, depending on the circumstances of each disbursement. Moreover, we account for disbursements related to past operations, which no longer contribute to current or future revenues, as current period costs. We accrue a liability for a future disbursement when an obligation related to environmental remediation is identified and the amount thereof can be reasonably estimated.

Estimated liabilities for environmental remediation and asset retirement obligations are subject to change as a result ofof: changes in laws, regulations and their interpretation,interpretation; the review of additional information on the extent and nature of site contamination,contamination; the determination of additional works that need to be undertaken,undertaken; improvements in technology,technology; the nature and timing of expenditure,expenditure; foreign currency exchange rates to the extent that some of these costs are incurred in U.S. dollars,dollars; and changes in discount rates.

We do not recognize the obligations related to the costs of future retirement of assets associated with the principal refining processes for gas and petrochemicals. These assets are considered to have an indefinite useful life due to the potential for maintenance and repairs, and, accordingly, we lack sufficient information to reasonably determine the date on which they will be decommissioned.

Financial Instruments

We face market risk caused by the volatility of hydrocarbon prices, exchange rates and interest rates. In addition,order to monitor and manage this risk, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities have developed general provisions relating to market risk management, which are comprised of policies and guidelines that promote an integrated scheme for market risk management, regulate the use of DFIs, guide the development of hedging strategies and provide strategies for the formulation of risk limits.

We enter into derivatives transactions with respectthe sole purpose of hedging financial risks related to offshore properties, our historical dismantlementoperations. Nonetheless, some of these transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment because they do not meet the strict requirements of IAS 39, “Financial Instruments Recognition and plugging experiences have been very limited, and,Measurement” for designation as hedges. They are therefore our estimatesrecorded in the financial statements as non-hedge instruments or as instruments entered into for trading purposes, despite the fact that their cash flows are offset by the cash flows of the expected cost or salvagepositions to which they relate. As a result, the changes in their fair value may vary from what will actually be incurred for many of these long-term properties when these activities are ultimately undertaken.

While we believe that our environmental remediation and asset retirement obligation provisions are adequate and that the interpretations of existing law we have applied are appropriate, the amounts estimated for future liabilities, which are based on discounted cash flows, may differ materially from the costs that will actually be incurred to remediate our properties. If we determine that an environmental remediation or asset retirement obligation provision is insufficient, it will be adjusted accordinglyrecognized in the results of operations of the period in which the determination is made.

Employee Benefit Plans

We provide a range of benefits to our currentfinancing cost. See Notes 8 and retired employees, including pensions, post-retirement health care benefits and post-employment benefits (primarily health services and supplemental payments). We annually record amounts relating to these plans based on calculations which include various actuarial assumptions, such as nominal discount rates, assumed rates of return, compensation increases, turnover rates and health care cost trend rates. We review our actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and modify them based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so. As required by Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP, the effect of these modifications is generally recorded or amortized over future periods. We believe that the assumptions used in recording our obligations under our plans, which are presented in Notes 13 and 21 II(d) to our consolidated financial statements included herein,herein.

Impairment of Non-Financial Assets

At each reporting date, we evaluate whether there is objective evidence that non-financial assets are reasonable based on our experienceimpaired. Significant judgment is required to appropriately assess the recoverable amount, represented by the higher of the value in use and on the advice of our independent actuaries.

Financial Instruments

We follow the provisions of Bulletin C-10, “Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Operations” (which we refer to as Bulletin C-10), which provides guidance for the recognition, valuation, accounting treatment and disclosures applicable to derivative financial instruments including hedges and embedded derivatives. Bulletin C-10 requires that all financial instruments, with the exception of “held to maturity” investments, be recorded at fair value. Held to maturity investments are recorded at amortized cost subject to an impairment review.

We have calculated the fair value, less costs to sell, of these derivatives using common market valuation methods and value-influencing market data at the relevant respective balance sheet dates. We believe that the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of these instruments, which are presented in Notes 12 and 21 I(g) to our consolidated financial statements included herein, are appropriate based on our experience, applicable accounting standards and the available inputs.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In addition to our oil and gas assets that could become impaired under the application of successful efforts accounting, other long-lived assets could become impaired and require write-down if circumstances warrant. Conditions that could cause our assets to become impaired include lower than forecasted commodity sales prices,

changes in our business plans and plant modernizations, or a significant adverse change in the national or international business climate. The amount of an impairment charge would be based on estimates of an asset’s fair value compared with its book value.reporting units. While we believe that our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding projected commodity sales prices, production and overhead costs and foreign currency exchange rates and inflation could materially affect the anticipated cash flows to be generated by long-livednon-financial assets, thereby affecting the evaluations of the carrying values of those long-livednon-financial assets.

Accounting for Income Taxes

As described under “Item 4—Information on the Company—Taxes and Duties” above and in Note 1917 to our consolidated financial statements included herein, a newthe current fiscal regime applicable to Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities became effective on January 1, 2006 and amendments to the fiscal regime applicable to Pemex-Exploration and Production became effective on January 1, 2008, January 1, 2009, January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011. In addition, PMI and P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. are subject to the tax regime applicable to all other Mexican corporations. In general, Mexican companies are taxed based on pre-tax income at a statutory rate.

As a consequence of the tax regime applicable to Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities, and in accordance with Mexican FRS, in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities (except Pemex-Exploration and Production) are required to estimate taxable income and the period over which deferred tax assets will be recoverable.according to IAS 12, “Income Taxes.” This process involves an estimation of our actual current tax and an assessment of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include a charge against the tax provision in the statement of operations.income.

Management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which our deferred tax asset will be recoverable.taxes. In the event that actual results differ from theseour estimates, or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish an additional valuation allowance, which could materially impactany adjustments recorded will affect our financial position and results of operations.net income during the corresponding period.

Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, we are named in a number of lawsuits of various types. We evaluate the merit of each claim and assess the likely outcome. Liabilities for loss contingencies are recorded when an unfavorable decisionit is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount isthereof can be reasonably estimable.estimated. When a reasonable estimation cannot be made, qualitative disclosure is provided in the notes to ourthe consolidated financial statements. We do not recognize contingent revenues, earnings or assets until their realization is assured. See “Item 8—Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Actions” and Note 1723 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Inflation AccountingEmployee Benefits

In accordance with FRS B-10, effective January 1, 2008,We operate a defined benefit pension plan under which we no longer use inflation accounting, unlessmake contributions to a fund that is administrated separately. We recognize the economic environmentcost for defined benefit plans based on independent actuarial computations applying the projected unit credit method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized within other comprehensive result for the period in which we operate qualifies as “inflationary,” asthey occur. The costs of prior services are recognized within profit or loss for the period in which they are incurred. Our net obligation with respect to the defined by Mexican FRS. Becausebenefit plan equals the economic environmentpresent value of the defined benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets. The value of any asset is limited to the present value of available reimbursements and reductions in future contributions to the three-year periods ended December 31, 2008, 2009plan. In addition, seniority premiums payable for disability are recognized within other long-term employee benefits. Termination benefits are recognized in profit or loss for the period in which they are incurred.

Benefits to employees were approximately 50.1% and 2010 did not qualify as inflationary, we did not use inflation accounting to prepare56.1% of our consolidated financial statementstotal liabilities as of December 31, 2009, 20102013 and 2011 included herein. As a result, unless otherwise indicated, all amounts included

2012, respectively, and any adjustments recorded will affect our net income during the corresponding period.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

in “Item 5—OperatingNotes 3(t) and Financial Review and Prospects” are presented in nominal terms; however, such amounts do reflect accumulated inflationary effects recognized up to December 31, 2007.

These policies are more fully described in Notes 3 and 213(u) to our audited consolidated financial statements discusses new accounting interpretations and revisions under IFRS that apply to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. There are no additional standards, amendments or interpretations that, even though not yet effective, could have a material impact on our financial statements included herein.in this report.

Sales Volumes and Prices

The profitability of our operations in any particular accounting period is directly related to the sales volume of, and average realized prices for, the crude oil and natural gas that we sell. These average realized prices for crude oil and natural gas fluctuate from one period to another due to world market conditions and other factors.

Export Volumes and Prices

Pemex-Exploration and Production sells crude oil to PMI, which then sells it to international clients. The volume of crude oil that we export is the volume delivered to international clients as adjusted for water content according to the bill of lading and standard market practice. PMI bases crude oil export price formulas on a basket of international reference prices and a constant set according to specific market conditions. We determine export prices of refined products, petrochemicals and natural gas by reference to market conditions and direct negotiations with our clients.

Significant changes in international crude oil prices directly affect our financial results. The impact of changes in crude oil prices on our refining activities and petrochemicals business depends on:

 

the magnitude of the change in crude oil prices;

 

how quickly petroleum and petrochemical product prices in international markets adjust to reflect changes in crude oil prices; and

 

the extent to which prices in Mexico, where we sell most of our petroleum products and petrochemicals, reflect international prices for those products.

The following table sets forth the weighted average market price per barrel of crude oil that PMI received from exports and the average price of its benchmark, West Texas Intermediate crude oil, for the years indicated. Note that the average prices of West Texas Intermediate crude oil are higher than the average prices of crude oil that we export. This is primarily due to the higher cost of refining sour crude oils, which make up a majority of our exports. Since 2011, the average prices of crude oil that we export have been higher than the average price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil, primarily due to the increased supply of light crude oil in the United States. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—International Trading.”

 

 Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 
 (in dollars per barrel)   (in dollars per barrel) 

West Texas Intermediate crude oil average price

 U.S.  $72.20   U.S.  $100.06   U.S.  $61.92   U.S.  $79.45   U.S.  $95.05    U.S. $61.92    U.S. $79.45    U.S. $95.04    U.S. $94.13    U.S. $98.01  

PEMEX crude oil weighted average export price

  61.64    84.38    57.42    72.46    101.01     57.42     72.46     101.13     101.82     98.46  

 

Note:The numbers in this table are daily average prices for the full year, which differ from spot prices at year end. On April 27, 2012,May 14, 2014, the spot price for West Texas Intermediate crude oil was U.S. $104.88$102.15 per barrel and the spot price for the PEMEX crude oil basket was an estimated U.S. $110.99$97.64 per barrel.

Sources: PMI operating statistics and Platt’s U.S. Marketscan (McGraw-Hill Company).

Domestic Prices

The formulas used to determine prices for petroleum products and petrochemical products sold in the Mexican market are determined by the SHCP and the Energy Regulatory Commission, in accordance with the

Ley Orgánica de la Administración Pública Federal (Federal Public Administration Organic Law),Law, theLey de Planeación(Planning (Planning Law), theReglamento Interior (Internal(Internal Regulations) of the SHCP and the EnergyLey de la Comisión Reguladora de Energía (Energy Regulatory Commission Law.Law). The SHCP and the Energy Regulatory Commission receive input from PEMEXus and other governmental ministries through committees composed of officers of Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary

entities, some of the subsidiary companies, and representatives of various government ministries, including, among others, the SHCP, the Ministry of Energy, theSecretaría de la Función Pública(Ministry of Public Function, which we refer to as the SFP), SFP, and theSecretaría de Economía (Ministry of Economy). The SHCP and the Energy Regulatory Commission determine wholesale and first-hand sale prices based on opportunity cost, which considers international prices, and makes adjustments to reflect transportation expenses and differences in the quality of our products relative to international benchmarks. The retail price is determined based on the wholesale price plus the value added tax, the retailer’s margin and freight costs. The SHCP adjusts prices for petroleum and petrochemical products sold in the Mexican market, so that they are consistent with the Mexican Government’s macroeconomic targets. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Refining—Pricing Decrees” and “—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Pricing Decrees.”

The following table compares the average prices in nominal terms of petroleum products in Mexico and in the United States for the years indicated.

 

 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S.  Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S. Mexico U.S. 

Petroleum Products

                    

Unleaded regular gasoline(1)

 U.S.  $100.59   U.S.  $110.15   U.S.  $104.44   U.S.  $129.84   U.S.  $91.02   U.S.  $91.49   U.S.  $104.52   U.S.  $108.49   U.S.  $118.55   U.S.  $141.46   U.S. $91.02   U.S. $91.49   U.S. $104.52   U.S. $108.49   U.S. $118.55   U.S. $140.36   U.S. $131.36   U.S. $145.42   U.S. $143.36   U.S. $139.70  

Premium gasoline(1)

  124.00    119.95    130.87    141.29    112.93    102.91    124.40    120.29    132.67    152.62    112.93    102.91    124.40    120.29    132.67    152.62    139.82    159.03    150.46    156.82  

Diesel(1)

  85.09    118.44    91.03    160.01    92.47    99.78    109.04    119.78    123.15    154.25    92.47    99.78    109.04    119.78    123.15    154.25    135.95    159.89    147.85    158.62  

Jet fuel(2)

  88.93    89.56    125.09    124.31    70.89    69.77    91.73    90.42    126.53    126.15    70.89    69.77    91.73    90.42    126.53    126.15    137.29    129.08    124.55    123.11  

Kerosene(3)

  85.10    91.13    91.03    126.82    92.48    71.49    109.05    92.51    123.16    125.84    92.48    71.49    109.05    92.51    123.16    125.84    135.96    128.37    147.85    122.78  

Natural Gas(4)

                    

Industrial

  7.45    7.68    9.67    9.65    4.43    5.33    5.25    5.49    4.98    5.02    4.43    5.33    5.25    5.49    4.98    5.11    3.63    3.87    5.27    4.66  

Residential

  14.96    13.08    16.47    13.89    15.66    12.14    15.98    11.39    15.89    10.80    15.66    12.14    15.98    11.39    15.89    11.03    12.73    10.71    15.22    10.33  

Selected Petrochemicals

                    

Ammonia(5)

  310.76    301.95    521.23    517.67    265.37    232.61    350.62    368.97    496.17    533.62    265.37    232.61    350.62    368.97    496.17    533.62    530.77    562.83    453.92    505.16  

Polyethylene L.D.(6)

  1,593.26    1,344.10    1,791.89    1,512.66    1,226.69    1,058.65    1,774.97    1,550.14    1,834.27    1,624.92    1,226.69    1,058.65    1,774.97    1,550.14    1,834.27    1,624.92    1,667.72    1,447.47    1,701.00    1,493.94  

Polyethylene H.D.(7)

  1,485.02    1,270.69    1,658.72    1,357.51    1,107.00    955.40    1,425.04    1,225.04    1,588.15    1,365.56    1,107.00    955.40    1,425.04    1,225.04    1,588.15    1,365.56    1,576.48    1,359.29    1,660.18    1,438.83  

Styrene(8)

  1,575.75    1,426.84    1,698.05    1,529.92    1,098.36    1,005.90    1,486.17    1,301.93    1,728.37    1,511.64    1,098.36    1,005.90    1,486.17    1,301.93    1,728.37    1,511.64    1,825.91    1,559.16    1,991.57    1,706.27  

 

(1)In U.S. dollars per barrel. Prices to final consumers including taxes. Premium price in Mexico City. U.S. prices in Houston, Texas.Sources for data accompanying note (1): Pemex-Refining and Lundberg Retail Price Survey (Lundberg Survey Inc.).

Sources for data accompanying note (1): Pemex-Refining and Lundberg Retail Price Survey (Lundberg Survey Inc.).

(2)In U.S. dollars per barrel. Mexican prices at the gate of the refineries. U.S. spot prices in Houston, Texas (Jet Fuel Gulf Coast Waterborne).Sources for data accompanying note (2): Pemex-Refining and Platt’s U.S. Marketscan (McGraw-Hill Company).

Sources for data accompanying note (2): Pemex-Refining and Platt’s U.S. Marketscan (McGraw-Hill Company).

(3)In U.S. dollars per barrel. In both countries, prices to final consumers. Mexico prices include taxes, while U.S. prices exclude taxes.Sources for data accompanying note (3): Pemex-Refining and Petroleum Marketing Monthly, published by the Energy Information Administration (Kerosene Type Jet Fuel, end users).

Sources for data accompanying note (3): Pemex-Refining and Petroleum Marketing Monthly, published by the Energy Information Administration (DOE) (Kerosene Type Jet Fuel, end users).

(4)In U.S. dollars per thousand cubic feet. Including taxes. Industrial natural gas prices for Mexico are estimated national average first-hand sales prices for the industrial sector. Industrial natural gas prices for the United States are national average prices for industrial users. Residential natural gas prices for Mexico are estimated national average prices for end-users. Residential natural gas prices for the United States are national average prices for end-users.Sources for data accompanying note (4): Pemex Retail Prices Management, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, Energy Regulatory Commission and Natural Gas Navigator, published by the Energy Information Administration.

Sources for data accompanying note (4): Pemex Retail Prices Management, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) and Natural Gas Navigator, published by the Energy Information Administration (DOE).

(5)In U.S. dollars per ton. Prices exclude taxes. Mexican wholesalebasis prices at Cosoleacaque Petrochemical Plant. Spot prices for the Caribbean.Sources for data accompanying note (5): Pemex-Petrochemicals, Fertecon Ammonia Report and Argus FMB Ammonia.

Sources for data accompanying note (5): Pemex-Petrochemicals, Fertecon Weekly Ammonia Fax (Fertecon Limited) and Fertilizer Market Bulletin (FMB Consultants Ltd.)

(6)In U.S. dollars per ton. PX 20020 P quality. Prices exclude taxes. Mexico prices to end consumers. U.S. prices are for exports.Sources for data accompanying note (6): Pemex-Petrochemicals and ICIS-Pricing.

Sources for data accompanying note (6): Pemex-Petrochemicals and ICIS-Pricing.

(7)In U.S. dollars per ton. PADMEX 65050 quality. Prices exclude taxes. Mexico prices to end consumers. U.S. prices are for exports.Sources for data accompanying note (7): Pemex-Petrochemicals and ICIS-Pricing.

Sources for data accompanying note (7): Pemex-Petrochemicals and ICIS-Pricing.

(8)In U.S. dollars per ton. Prices exclude taxes. Mexico prices to end consumers. U.S. reference prices are an average of contract and spot prices.Sources for data accompanying note (8): Pemex-Petrochemicals and ICIS-Pricing.

Sources for data accompanying note (8): Pemex-Petrochemicals and ICIS-Pricing.

IEPS Tax, Hydrocarbon Duties and Other Taxes

The following table sets forth the taxes and duties that we recorded for each of the past three years.

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
  2009   2010   2011   2011 2012   2013 
  (in millions of pesos)(1)   (in millions of pesos)(1) 

Hydrocarbon extraction duties and others

   Ps.  542,375     Ps.  649,956     Ps.  871,687    Ps.871,686   Ps.898,398    Ps.857,356  

Hydrocarbons income tax

   2,503     2,460     708     (677  2,393     3,788  

Income tax

   1,756     1,725     3,621     3,638    1,855     3,752  

IEPS tax(2)

                             
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

   Ps.  546,633     Ps.  654,141     Ps.  876,016    Ps.  874,647   Ps.  902,646    Ps.  864,896  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Note:For a description of these taxes and duties, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Taxes and Duties.” Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Figures for all years are stated in nominal pesos.
(2)During 2009, 20102011, 2012 and 2011,2013, no IEPS tax was generated due to negative IEPS tax rates, as explained below.
Source:PEMEX’s audited financial statements.

Source: PEMEX’s audited financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS.

The IEPS tax ensures that Pemex-Refining retains the portion of our sales revenues that represents the adjusted international reference prices of our products, and the Mexican Government receives the difference between the domestic retail prices, which are prices that are set by the Mexican Government based on target rates of inflation, and the adjusted international reference prices of diesel and gasoline. The SHCP determines retail prices of gasoline and diesel before the beginning of each fiscal year in conjunction with the preparation of the Mexican Government’s budget for that year.

Our retail prices for gasoline and diesel reflect the addition of the IEPS tax when the IEPS tax rate is positive, as well as the value added tax. We charge the IEPS tax only on gasoline and diesel.

For automotive fuels, the IEPS tax is equal to (a) the retail price at which gasoline and automotive diesel are sold to retailers, less (b) value-added tax, less (c) Pemex-Refining’s wholesale price, less (d) freight to gas stations and less (e) retailer’s margin.

 

LOGOLOGO

When international prices increase, our wholesale price will increase and, as a result, the IEPS tax that we collect from consumers and transfer to the Mexican Government will decrease, since the retail prices of gasoline and diesel are fixed.

From the end of 2005 through April 2012,2014, the retail prices of gasoline and diesel have been less than the sum of Pemex-Refining’s wholesale price, the value-added tax, the freight to gas stations and the retailer’s margin, which has generated a “negative” IEPS tax rate, and, therefore, no IEPS tax was paid during these years. Beginning in 2006, the Federal Revenue Law established that PEMEX was permitted to credit negative IEPS taxes against its IEPS tax liability. Any remaining surplus could then be credited first toward its value added tax

liability and then toward ordinary hydrocarbon duties. These IEPS tax credits are recorded in our income statement under “other revenues.” In 2011,2013, we were permitted to credit Ps. 178.994.5 billion of negative IEPS tax, of

which we credited Ps. 73.681.4 billion against our IEPS tax and value added tax liabilities. The remaining surplus was credited against the Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty.

Relation to the Mexican Government

Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities were created as decentralized public entities of the Mexican Government, rather than as Mexican corporations. Therefore, we do not have the power to issue shares of equity securities evidencing ownership interests and are not required, unlike Mexican corporations, to have multiple shareholders. The Mexican Government closely regulates and supervises our operations. However, our financing obligations do not constitute obligations of and are not guaranteed by the Mexican Government. Mexican Government secretaries control key executive decisions at PEMEX. The President of Mexico appoints six of the 15 members of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos. The President of Mexico also appoints four professional members to the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos, whose appointments are ratified by the Senate. In addition, the SFP appoints the external auditors of the subsidiary entities.

The Mexican Government incorporates the annual budget and financing program of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities into its consolidated annual budget, which it submits to the Chamber of Deputies for approval.

See “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Energy Reform” for information regarding the changes that will occur with regard to our relation with the Mexican Government in the future as a result of the enactment of the Energy Reform Decree.

Inflation

Mexico experienced high inflation during the 1980s. The annual rate of inflation (as measured by the change in the Mexican National Consumer Price Index, or NCPI) decreased from a high of 159.2% in 1987 to 11.9% in 1992, 8.0% in 1993 and 7.1% in 1994. However, the economic events that followed the devaluation of the peso against the U.S. dollar in late 1994 and 1995, along with turbulence in international financial markets, caused inflation to increase to 52.0% in 1995. After 1995, inflation decreased to 27.7% in 1996 and 15.7% in 1997. The annual inflation rate was 3.8% in 2007, 6.5% in 2008, 3.6% in 2009, 4.4% in 2010, and 3.8% in 2011.2011, 3.6% in 2012 and 4.0% in 2013.

MexicanWe do not use inflation has affected our consolidatedaccounting, unless the economic environment in which we operate qualifies as “hyperinflationary,” as defined by IFRS. In accordance with IFRS, the threshold for considering an economy hyperinflationary, and consequently, adjusting certain line items in the financial statements infor inflation, is reached when the following ways:

Until December 31, 2007, we adjustedcumulative three-year inflation rate is 100% or more. Because the value of certain of our fixed assets, materials and spare parts on our balance sheet to reflect the effects of inflation, using the NCPIeconomic environment in a comprehensive manner. This revaluation increased our assets in periods of high inflation. See Note 3(a) to our consolidated financial statements included herein. When we revalued fixed assets and inventories to reflect the effects of inflation, our subsequent depreciation and cost of sales charges increased, reducing our income. The higher carrying value further exposed us to subsequent impairment charges. See Note 3(o) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Until December 31, 2007, Mexican FRS required that financial statements recognize the effects of inflation in accordance with Bulletin B-10. A component of inflation accounting which is not reflected in historical based accounting is the recognition of a gain or loss on monetary position, which is included in the income statement as a component of comprehensive financing cost. The gain or loss on monetary position captures the impact of purchasing power fluctuations on monetary assets and liabilities. To the extent that we have had a net monetary liability position, the income statement reflected a monetary gain as measured by the change in the NCPI. To the extent that we have had a net monetary asset position, the income statement reflected a monetary loss as measured by the change in the NCPI.

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FRS B-10, which superseded Bulletin B-10 and its five amendments, as well as the related circulars andInterpretación de las Normas de Información Financiera(Interpretation of Financial Reporting Standards, or INIF) No. 2. The principal effects of FRS B-10 on our consolidated financial statements are:

Recognition of the effects of inflation on the financial information until December 31, 2007, based on the NCPI, as reported by Banco de México. In 2009, 2010 and 2011 the effects of inflation were not recognized in our consolidated financial statements because the accumulated inflation over the three-year periods ended December 31, 2008, 20092011, 2012 and 2010 was less than 26%, and the economic environment therefore2013 did not qualify as “inflationary.”

If at the end of a future year, the accumulatedhyperinflationary, we did not use inflation over the most recent three-year period wereaccounting to be equal to or higher than 26%, the economic environment would be considered “inflationary,” and we would therefore be required to retroactively recognize the effects of inflation not previously included inprepare our consolidated financial statements while the economic environment was considered non-inflationary. The indexes used for the recognitionas of inflation in 2009, 2010December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2011 were as follows.

December 31,

      Inflation 
  NCPI(1)   For the year  Accumulated 

2011

   103.551     3.82  12.26

2010

   99.742     4.40  15.19

2009

   95.536     3.57  14.48

(1)In 2011, the base year for the calculation of NCPI was changed to 2010, so that NCPI for the last 15 days of 2010 equals 100. The NCPI figures for 2011 and prior years have been restated to reflect the change in base year.
Source:Banco de México

In addition, beginning in 2008, comparisons of financial results of different years are presented in nominal, not constant, terms.2013 included herein.

The initial effects derived from the adoption of FRS B-10 included a Ps. 171.7 billion charge in the restatement of equity and a credit to results from prior years in the same amount. However, our income statement, assets, liabilities and the balance sheet were not otherwise affected.

Consolidation

Our financial statements consolidate the results of Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary entities and the subsidiary companies. Certain non-material subsidiary companies are not consolidated and are accounted for under either the cost method or the equity method. For a list of the consolidated subsidiary companies, see Note 3(b)3(a) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Export Agreements

Even though Mexico is not a member of OPEC, in the past, following OPEC announcements of production cuts and increases of production, and in order to maintain oil market stability, Mexico has announced increases

and decreases in Mexico’s crude oil exports in connection with increases or decreases of crude oil production by other oil producing countries. However, since 2004, PEMEX haswe have not changed itsour export levels as a result of announcements by OPEC, and we believe that Mexico has no plans to change PEMEX’sour current level of crude oil exports.

Results of Operations of Petróleos Mexicanos, the Subsidiary Entities and the Subsidiary Companies—For the Year Ended December 31, 20112013 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20102012

Sales

Total sales increaseddecreased by 21.6%2.3% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 1,282.11,646.9 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 1,558.41,608.2 billion in 2011.2013. This increasedecrease resulted primarily from highera decrease in sales of crude oil and petroleum productslower average sales prices which were partially offset by a lower volume of Mexican crude oil exports.in the international markets.

Domestic Sales

Domestic sales increased by 13.9%5.0% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 683.9867.0 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 779.2910.2 billion in 2011,2013, primarily due to increases in the pricesaverage price of gasoline and volumes of sales of petroleum products and petrochemicals sold by PEMEX.diesel. Domestic sales of natural gas decreasedincreased by 4.2%38.3% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 68.751.2 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 65.870.8 billion in 2011,2013, as a result of a decreasean increase in the price of natural gas which was partially offset byand a 4.0%1.8% increase in the volume of domestic sales of natural gas, from 3,2543,402 million cubic feet per day in 20102012 to 3,3853,464 million cubic feet per day in 2011.2013. Domestic sales of petroleum products increased by 15.9%3.3% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 583.7779.6 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 676.4805.5 billion in 2011,2013, primarily due to higher gasoline, diesel and LPG prices. Domestic petrochemical sales (including sales of certain by-products of the petrochemical production process) increaseddecreased by 17.5%6.4%, from Ps. 31.436.2 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 36.933.9 billion in 2011,2013, due to an increasea decrease in the prices of most petrochemical products sold by PEMEX andus, despite a 1.0%173.9% increase in the volume of petrochemical product sales.

Export Sales

Export sales increaseddecreased by 30.4%11.0% in peso terms in 2011,2013, from Ps. 592.9772.7 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 773.0687.7 billion in 2011.2013. Excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group (in order to show only the amount of export sales related to the subsidiary entities), export sales by the subsidiary entities to the PMI Group and third parties increaseddecreased by 33.4%9.9% in peso terms, from Ps. 517.6687.9 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 690.4619.8 billion in 2011.2013. In dollar terms, excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group, export sales (which are U.S. dollar-denominated) increaseddecreased by 35.4%7.3% in 2011,2013, from U.S. $41.0$52.3 billion in 20102012 to U.S. $55.5$48.5 billion in 2011.2013. This increasedecrease was the result of higher crude oil and product prices, which were partially offset byprimarily due to a 5.3% decrease in the volume of crude oil exports.exports and a 3.3% decrease in prices. The trading and export activities of the PMI Group generated additional marginal revenues of Ps. 82.567.9 billion in 2011, 9.6% greater2013, 19.9% lower in peso terms than the Ps. 75.384.8 billion of additional revenues generated in 2010,2012, mainly due to higherlower international prices of crude oil and other products traded by the PMI Group. The weighted average price per barrel of crude oil that the PMI Group sold to third parties in 20112013 was U.S. $101.01, 39.4% higher$98.46, or 3.3%, lower than the weighted average price of U.S. $72.46$101.82 in 2010.2012.

Crude oil export sales by Pemex-Exploration and Production to PMI accounted for 89.0%88.5% of total export sales (excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group) in 2011,2013, as compared to 87.5%89.9% in 2010.2012. These crude oil sales increaseddecreased in peso terms by 35.6%11.3% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 452.9618.1 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 614.2548.4 billion in 2011,2013, and increaseddecreased in dollar terms by 37.6%8.7% in 2011,2013, from U.S. $35.9$47.0 billion in 20102012 to U.S. $49.4$42.9 billion in 2011.2013. The weighted average price per barrel of crude oil that Pemex-Exploration and Production sold to PMI for export in 20112013 was U.S. $101.09, 39.8% higher$98.54, 3.3% lower than the weighted average price of U.S. $72.32$101.86 in 2010.2012.

Export sales of petroleum products, including natural gas and natural gas liquids, by Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals to the PMI Group and third parties decreasedincreased from 11.9%9.6% of total export sales (excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group) in 20102012 to 10.6%11.2% of those export sales in 2011.2013. Export

sales of petroleum products, including natural gas and natural gas liquids, increased by 18.5%4.7%, from Ps. 61.666.0 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 73.069.1 billion in 2011,2013, primarily due to increasesan increase in prices.the volume of fuel oil sold. In dollar terms, export sales of petroleum products, including natural gas and natural gas liquids, increased by 20.4%8.0%, from U.S. $4.9$5.0 billion in 20102012 to U.S. $5.9$5.4 billion in 2011.2013. Export sales of natural gas decreasedincreased by 95.0%300.0%, from Ps. 0.40.01 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 0.020.04 billion in 2011.2013. This decreaseincrease was mainly due to reduced availabilityan increase in the price and volume of natural gas for export,sold as a result of higher demand in the Mexican sector.international market.

Petrochemical products accounted for the remainder of export sales in 20102012 and 2011.2013. Export sales of petrochemical products (including certain by-products of the petrochemical process) increaseddecreased by 3.2%40.5% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 3.13.7 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 3.22.2 billion in 2011,2013, primarily as a result of increasesdecreases in prices.the prices and volumes of ammonia, butadiene and ethylene. In dollar terms, export sales of petrochemical products (including certain by-products of the petrochemical process) increaseddecreased by 6.3%39.4% in 2011,2013, from U.S. $246.1$282.6 million in 20102012 to U.S. $261.7$171.3 million in 2011.2013.

Services Income

In 20102012 and 2011,2013, services income amounted to Ps. 5.37.2 billion and Ps. 6.310.3 billion, respectively. Services income consistsincreased by Ps. 3.1 billion, or 43.1%, during 2013, primarily as a result of a Ps. 2.1 billion increase in insurance revenues from Kot AG and a Ps. 1.1 billion increase in the amount of fees chargedcollected by Pemex-RefiningPemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals for freight and pipeline transportation services provided to third parties.

CostsCost of Sales and General Expenses

CostsCost of sales increaseddecreased by 23.6%2.2%, from Ps. 631.4832.5 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 780.6814.0 billion in 2011. This increase was mainly due to an increase of Ps. 114.0 billion in gasoline, fuel oil and diesel purchases, variations in the value of inventory of Ps. 7.1 billion, operational expenses of Ps. 18.6 billion and conservation and maintenance expenses of Ps. 10.7 billion.

General expenses decreased by 7.6%, from Ps. 104.3 billion in 2010 to Ps. 96.4 billion in 2011.2013. This decrease was primarilymainly due to a decrease of Ps. 2.739.3 billion in health services expensespurchases of imported gasoline and diesel, a Ps. 1.8 billion decrease in costs associated with exploration activities and a Ps. 4.31.3 billion decrease in expenses incurred in connection with unsuccessful exploratory well projects. This decrease was offset by a Ps. 13.6 billion increase in operational expenses, a Ps. 5.0 billion increase in employee wages and benefits, a Ps. 4.8 billion increase in provisions and a Ps. 11.5 billion increase in the net periodic cost of employee benefits in 2013, which was primarily due to the change in the applicable discount rate from 6.90% in 2012 to 8.45% in 2013 and the expected rate of return on plan assets for retirement benefits.

General expenses increased by 11.0%, from Ps. 118.1 billion in 2012 to Ps. 131.1 billion in 2013. This increase was primarily due to a Ps. 7.2 billion increase in the net cost of employee benefits for the period.period and a Ps. 5.1 billion increase in operating expenses, which was primarily composed of a Ps. 3.4 billion increase in employee wages and benefits, a Ps. 539.3 million increase in the purchase of materials, a Ps. 225.4 million increase in freight services and a Ps. 523.7 million increase in taxes and duties.

Other Revenues (Principally IEPS Benefit), Net

Other revenues, net, increaseddecreased by 173.0%69.1% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 71.6209.0 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 195.564.5 billion in 2011,2013, primarily due to highera lower credit attributable to the negative rates of the IEPS tax rate in 20112013 as compared to 2010, due to2012, which is generated when the fact thatprices at which we sell gasoline and diesel in the domestic market are lower than the international prices rose faster than domesticmarket prices for products subject to the IEPS tax.such products. As a result, PEMEXwe recognized revenues from IEPS tax credits of Ps. 73.6214.1 billion in 20102012 and Ps. 178.994.5 billion in 2011.2013.

Comprehensive Financing ResultIncome

Under Mexican FRS, comprehensive financing result reflects interestFinancing income (including gains and losses on certain derivative instruments), interest expense and foreign exchange loss. In 2011, our loss associated with comprehensive financing result increased by 663.3%,5.6% in 2013, from a loss of Ps. 12.023.2 billion in 20102012 to a loss of Ps. 91.624.5 billion in 2011, mainly2013, primarily due to a Ps. 79.76.2 billion increase in foreign exchange loss. interest income, which was partially offset by a Ps. 4.9 billion decrease in net income associated with certain DFIs.

Financing Cost

Financing cost decreased by 25.9% in 2013, from Ps. 73.0 billion in 2012 to Ps. 54.1 billion in 2013, primarily due to a Ps. 12.5 billion decrease in costs associated with certain DFIs and a Ps. 6.4 billion decrease in interest expense.

Foreign Exchange, Net

A substantial portion of our indebtedness, 82.1%80.2% at December 31, 2011,2013, is denominated in foreign currencies. The depreciation of the peso in 20112013 therefore resulted in a Ps. 48.8 billion, or 108.8%, decrease in our foreign exchange, net, from approximately Ps. 44.8 billion in 2012 to a loss of approximately Ps. 58.84.0 billion in 2011, as compared to a foreign exchange gain of approximately Ps. 20.2 billion in 2010.2013. The value of the peso in dollar terms depreciated by 11.7%0.5% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 12.357113.0101 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 20102012 to Ps. 13.990413.0765 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2011,2013, as compared to a 5.7%7.5% appreciation of the peso in dollar terms in 2010.2012.

Taxes and Duties

Hydrocarbon extraction duties and other duties and taxes (including the IEPS tax) increaseddecreased by 33.9%4.2% in 2011,2013, from Ps. 654.1902.6 billion in 20102012 to Ps. 876.0864.9 billion in 2011,2013, largely due to higherlower average crude oil prices. In 2011,2013, duties and taxes represented 56.2%53.8% of total sales, whereas in 20102012 they represented 51.0%54.8% of total sales, because the decrease in our effective ratesales in 2013 directly impacted the amount of taxes and duties increases as oil prices increase.owed.

Net Income/Loss

In 2011,2013, we had a net loss of Ps. 91.5170.1 billion from Ps. 1,558.41,608.2 billion in total sales revenues, as compared to a net lossincome of Ps. 46.52.6 billion from Ps. 1,282.11,646.9 billion in total sales revenues in 2010.2012. This increasedecrease in net lossincome in

2011 2013 is primarilymainly explained by a decrease in sales of Ps. 38.7 billion, a decrease in other revenues, net of Ps. 144.5 billion, which was primarily due to a lower credit attributable to the negative IEPS tax rate in 2013 as compared to 2012, and the foreign exchange loss caused by the depreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar and the euro in 2013 as compared to 2012. This decrease was partially offset by a Ps. 79.718.5 billion decrease in cost of sales, a Ps. 18.9 billion decrease in financing cost, a Ps. 1.3 billion increase in ourfinancing income and a Ps. 37.7 billion decrease in taxes and duties.

Other Comprehensive Results

In 2013, we had an income of Ps. 254.3 billion in other comprehensive results, as compared to a loss associated with comprehensive financing result andof Ps. 376.8 billion in 2012, due to a decrease in the Ps. 221.9 billionreserve for employee benefits that resulted from an increase in the duties and taxes we paid,rate of Mexican Government bonds, which were only partially offset byis used to determine the Ps. 135.0 billion increase in our operating income and Ps. 124.0 billion increase in other revenues.discount rate applied as part of the actuarial computation method.

Results of Operations of Petróleos Mexicanos, the Subsidiary Entities and the Subsidiary Companies—For the Year Ended December 31, 20102012 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20092011

Sales

Total sales increased by 17.6%5.7% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 1,089.91,558.5 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 1,282.11,646.9 billion in 2010.2012. This increase resulted primarily from higher crude oil and petroleum products prices, andwhich were partially offset by a greaterlower volume of crude oil exports.

Domestic Sales

Domestic sales increased by 14.7%11.3% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 596.4779.2 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 683.9867.0 billion in 2010,2012, primarily due to increases in the prices and volumesvolume of sales of natural gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals sold by PEMEX. us.

Domestic sales of natural gas increaseddecreased by 14.7%22.2% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 59.965.8 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 68.751.2 billion in 2010,2012, as a result of an increasea decrease in the price of natural gas, andwhich was partially offset by a 4.3%0.5% increase in the volume of domestic sales of natural gas, from 3,1193,385 million cubic feet per day in 20092011 to 3,2543,402 million cubic feet per day in 2010.2012. Domestic sales of petroleum products increased by 13.7%15.3% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 513.4676.4 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 583.7779.6 billion in 2010,2012, primarily due to higher gasoline, diesel, fuel oil and jet fuel prices. Domestic petrochemical sales (including sales of certain by-products of the petrochemical production process) increaseddecreased by 36.5%1.9%, from Ps. 23.036.9 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 31.436.2 billion in 2010,2012, due to increasesa decrease in the prices of most petrochemical products sold by PEMEXus and a 5.1% increase3.0% decrease in the volume of petrochemical product sales.

Export Sales

Export sales increaseddecreased by 21.4%0.04% in peso terms in 2010,2012, from Ps. 488.3773.0 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 592.9772.7 billion in 2010.2012. Excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group (in order to show only the amount of export sales related to the subsidiary entities), export sales by the subsidiary entities to the PMI Group and third parties increaseddecreased by 27.2%0.4% in peso terms, from Ps. 406.9690.4 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 517.6687.9 billion in 2010.2012. In dollar terms, excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group, export sales (which are U.S. dollar-denominated) increaseddecreased by 34.9%5.8% in 2010,2012, from U.S. $30.4$55.5 billion in 20092011 to U.S. $41.0$52.3 billion in 2010.2012. This increasedecrease was the result of higher crude oil and product prices and an increaseprimarily due to a decrease in the volume of crude oil exports. The trading and export activities of the PMI Group generated additional marginal revenues of Ps. 75.384.8 billion in 2010, 7.5% less2012, 2.8% greater in peso terms than the Ps. 81.482.5 billion of additional revenues generated in 2009,2011, mainly due to a decrease in the volumehigher international prices of exportcrude oil and other products traded by the PMI Group. The weighted average price per barrel of crude oil that the PMI Group sold to third parties in 20102012 was U.S. $72.46, 26.2%$101.82, 0.7% higher than the weighted average price of U.S. $57.42$101.13 in 2009.2011.

Crude oil export sales by Pemex-Exploration and Production to PMI accounted for 87.5%89.9% of total export sales (excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group) in 2010,2012, as compared to 84.5%89.0% in 2009.2011. These crude oil sales increased in peso terms by 31.7%0.6% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 343.9614.2 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 452.9618.1 billion in 2010,2012, and increaseddecreased in dollar terms by 40.2%4.9% in 2010,2012, from U.S. $25.6$49.4 billion in 20092011 to U.S. $35.9$47.0 billion in 2010.2012. The weighted average price per barrel of crude oil that Pemex-Exploration and Production sold to PMI for export in 20102012 was U.S. $72.32, 25.9%$101.86, 0.8% higher than the weighted average price of U.S. $57.44$101.09 in 2009. The volume of crude oil exports increased by 11.4%, from 1,222 thousand barrels per day in 2009 to 1,361 thousand barrels per day in 2010, mainly due to (i) the replacement of crude oil with naphtha and natural gasoline as raw materials in the production of refined products by Pemex-Petrochemicals at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex, as well as (ii) a decrease in Pemex-Refining’s requirements for crude oil, resulting from an intensive maintenance program and operational issues at its facilities.2011.

Export sales of petroleum products, including natural gas and natural gas liquids, by Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals to the PMI Group and third parties decreased from 15.1%10.6% of total export

sales (excluding the trading activities of the PMI Group) in 20092011 to 11.9%9.6% of those export sales in 2010.2012. Export sales of petroleum products, including natural gas and natural gas liquids, increaseddecreased by 0.5%9.6%, from Ps. 61.373.0 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 61.666.0 billion in 2010,2012, primarily due to increasesdecreases in the volume and prices of fuel oil and export volumes.naphtha. In dollar terms, export sales of petroleum products, including natural gas and natural gas liquids, increaseddecreased by 6.5%15.3%, from U.S. $4.6$5.9 billion in 20092011 to U.S. $4.9$5.0 billion in 2010.2012. Export sales of natural gas decreased by 60.0%50.0%, from Ps. 1.00.02 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 0.40.01 billion in 2010.2012. This decrease was mainly due to reduced availability of natural gas for export, as a result of higher demand in the Mexican electricity sector.domestic market.

Petrochemical products accounted for the remainder of export sales in 20092011 and 2010.2012. Export sales of petrochemical products (including certain by-products of the petrochemical process) increased by 82.4%15.6% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 1.73.2 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 3.13.7 billion in 2010,2012, primarily as a result of increases in ammonia, butadiene, ethylene and polyethylene prices. In dollar terms, export sales of petrochemical products (including certain by-products of the petrochemical process) increased by 87.9%8.0% in 2010,2012, from U.S. $131.0$261.7 million in 20092011 to U.S. $246.1$282.6 million in 2010.2012.

Services Income

ServicesIn 2011 and 2012, services income amounted to Ps. 5.36.3 billion in both 2009 and 2010.Ps. 7.2 billion, respectively. Services income consists primarily of fees charged by Pemex-Refining for freight services provided to third parties.

CostsCost of Sales and General Expenses

CostsCost of sales increased by 12.6%6.9%, from Ps. 560.8778.8 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 631.4832.5 billion in 2010.2012. This increase was mainly due to an increase of Ps. 86.120.1 billion in gasoline, fuel oil and diesel purchases, operational expenses of imported productsPs. 11.4 billion and conservation and maintenance expenses of Ps. 10.5 billion.

General expenses increased by 9.9%, from Ps. 107.5 billion in 2011 to be resoldPs. 118.1 billion in Mexico and2012. This increase was primarily due to an increase of Ps. 8.8 billion in administrative expenses, which was composed of a Ps. 7.65.5 billion increase in the net cost of employee benefits for the period which was only partially offset byand a Ps. 38.02.8 billion decreaseincrease in cost of sales due to variationsoperating expenses. The increase in the value of inventory.

Generalgeneral expenses increased by 3.8%, from Ps. 100.5 billion in 2009 to Ps. 104.3 billion in 2010. This increase was primarilyalso due to an increase of Ps. 1.41.8 billion in wagestransportation and distribution expenses, which was composed of a Ps. 1.0 billion976.8 million increase in the net cost of employee benefits for the period.period and a Ps. 684.8 million increase in operating expenses.

Other Revenues (Principally IEPS Benefit), Net

Other revenues, net, increased by 79.9%10.5% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 39.8189.1 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 71.6209.0 billion in 2010,2012, primarily due to higher profits resulting from the negative rates of the IEPS tax rate in 20102012 as compared to 2009,2011, due to the fact that international prices rose faster than domestic prices for products subject to the IEPS tax. As a result, PEMEXwe recognized revenues from IEPS tax credits of Ps. 37.2178.9 billion in 20092011 and Ps. 73.6214.1 billion in 2010.2012.

Comprehensive Financing ResultIncome

Under Mexican FRS, comprehensive financing result reflectsFinancing income decreased by 24.2% in 2012, from Ps. 30.6 billion in 2011 to Ps. 23.2 billion in 2012, primarily due to a Ps. 1.7 billion decrease in interest income, (including gains and losses on certain derivative instruments), interest expense and foreign exchange gain or loss. In 2010, our lossas well as a Ps. 5.7 billion decrease in net income associated with comprehensive financing result decreasedcertain DFIs.

Financing Cost

Financing cost increased by 21.6%,15.5% in 2012, from a loss of Ps. 15.363.2 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 73.0 billion in 2012, primarily due to a loss of Ps. 12.010.9 billion increase in 2010, as a result of a larger foreign currency exchange rate gain during 2010 as compared to 2009,interest expense, which was partially offset by an increasea Ps. 1.1 billion decrease in our net interest expense during the year.costs associated with certain DFIs.

Foreign Exchange, Rate Gain.Net

A substantial portion of PEMEX’sour indebtedness, 80.3%80.5% at December 31, 2010,2012, is denominated in foreign currencies. The appreciation of the peso in 2012 therefore resulted in a Ps. 104.9 billion, or 174.5%, increase in our foreign exchange, net, from a foreign exchange loss of Ps. 60.1 billion in 2011 to a Ps. 44.8 billion foreign exchange gain in 2012. The value of approximately Ps. 20.2 billion in 2010, as compared to a foreign exchange gain of approximately Ps. 14.7 billion in 2009. The peso/dollar exchange rate appreciated by 5.7%the peso in dollar terms appreciated by 7.5% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 13.058713.9904 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 20092011 to Ps. 12.357113.0101 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2010,2012, as compared to a 3.7% appreciation13.2% depreciation of the exchange ratepeso in 2009.dollar terms in 2011.

Interest, Net. PEMEX’s net interest expense increased by Ps. 2.1 billion in 2010, primarily as a result of net unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments treated as non-hedges.

Taxes and Duties

Hydrocarbon extraction duties and other duties and taxes (including the IEPS tax) increased by 19.7%3.2% in 2010,2012, from Ps. 546.6874.6 billion in 20092011 to Ps. 654.1902.6 billion in 2010,2012, largely due to higher average crude oil prices. In 2010,2012, duties and taxes represented 51.0%54.8% of total sales, whereas in 20092011 they represented 50.2%56.1% of total sales, because the growth rate of our effectivesales was greater in 2012 than the growth rate of taxes and duties increases as oil prices increase.duties.

Net Income/Loss

In 2010,2012, we had a net lossincome of Ps. 46.52.6 billion from Ps. 1,282.11,646.9 billion in total sales revenues, as compared to a net loss of Ps. 94.4106.9 billion from Ps. 1,089.91,558.5 billion in total sales revenues in 2009.2011. This decreaseincrease in net lossincome in 20102012 is primarily explained by a 34.3%the Ps. 104.9 billion increase in income before taxesour foreign exchange, net, due to the

appreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar and dutiesthe euro during 2012 as compared to 2011. This increase was only partially offset by an increase in cost of sales as a result of higher crude oil, natural gasgasoline prices, an increase in financing cost, a decrease in financing income and petroleum products prices,an increase in general expenses.

Other Comprehensive Results

In 2012, we had a Ps. 376.8 billion loss in other comprehensive results, as wellcompared to a Ps. 6.4 billion loss in 2011, due to an increase in the reserve for employee benefits that resulted from a decrease in the rate of Mexican Government bonds, which is used to determine the discount rate applied as a larger IEPS tax credit.part of the actuarial computation method.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Equity Structure and Certificates of Contribution “A”

Our total equity as of December 31, 20112013 was negative Ps. 193.9185.2 billion, and our total capitalization (long-term debt plus equity) amounted to Ps. 478.4565.3 billion. Under the Commercial Bankruptcy Law of Mexico, decentralized public entities such as Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities cannot be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding.

In March 1990, the Mexican Government exchanged U.S. $7.58 billion worth of external debt of Petróleos Mexicanos with international commercial banks for 30-year Collateralized Fixed Rate Bonds Due 2019 and Collateralized Floating Rate Bonds Due 2019 (also called Brady Bonds) issued by the Mexican Government. In exchange for the cancellation of this external debt, Petróleos Mexicanos’ indebtedness to the Mexican Government increased by an amount equal to U.S. $7.58 billion. The new indebtedness was denominated in currencies other than pesos. In December 1990, the Mexican Government and Petróleos Mexicanos agreed to capitalize the indebtedness incurred in March 1990 into Petróleos Mexicanos’ equity as Certificates of Contribution “A.” As a condition to this capitalization, Petróleos Mexicanos agreed to pay a minimum guaranteed dividend to the Mexican Government equal to the debt service on the capitalized debt at the exchange rates in effect at the date the payments were made. The total dividend on the Certificates of Contribution “A” was approved annually by the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos after the close of each fiscal year. In each quarter until January 2007, Petróleos Mexicanos made advance payments to the Mexican Government that totaled a prorated portion of the minimum guaranteed dividend. Following a payment of Ps. 4,270 million in January 2007, and because PEMEX’sour obligation to pay minimum guaranteed dividends was fully performed in 2007, no further advance payments on the minimum guaranteed dividend are payable to the Mexican Government.

However, the Mexican Government may still require Petróleos Mexicanos to declare and pay dividends to it at any time.

In December 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos capitalized interest on funds provided by the Mexican Government in the amount of Ps. 467.2 million. In December 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos capitalized interest in the amount of Ps. 0.122 million, corresponding to interest earned at the end of 2010 on funds provided by the Mexican Government for use in infrastructure works. During 2011,2012 and 2013, there was no capitalization of interest.

Cash Flows from Operating, Financing and Investing Activities

During 2011, under Mexican FRS,2013, net funds provided by operating activities determined on a cash flow basis, totaled Ps. 177.3190.3 billion, as compared to Ps. 166.0213.3 billion in 2010.2012. Net income before taxes and dutiesloss was Ps. 784.5170.1 billion, as compared to net income before taxes and duties of Ps. 607.62.6 billion in 2010.2012. Our net

proceeds cash flows from financing activities indebtedness (i.e., new indebtedness incurred minus principal and interest payments on debt) totaled Ps. 4.210.3 billion in 2011,2013, as compared to negative net cash flows from financing activities of Ps. 60.9 million10.6 billion in 2010.2012. During 2011,2013, we applied net fundscash flows of Ps. 175.8244.2 billion for net investments at cost in fixed assets, including exploration expenses, as compared to our application of net fundscash flows of Ps. 184.6199.3 billion in 20102012 for net investments at cost in fixed assets; we also applied Ps. 20.8 billion to acquire available-for-sale investments in 2011.assets, including exploration expenses.

At December 31, 2011,2013, our cash and cash equivalents totaled Ps. 117.180.7 billion, as compared to Ps. 133.6119.2 billion at December 31, 2010.2012.

Investment Policies

Our Finance and Treasury Department requires that we maintain financial resources sufficient to meet our payment commitments and those of the subsidiary entities, as well as a comprehensive, consolidated cash position and related projections in anticipation of such commitments.

We also develop mechanisms for the investment of our financial resources aimed at allowing us to take advantage of favorable market conditions and to access the most favorable contracting terms offered to us by financial institutions.

Investments of financial resources by our Finance and Treasury Department, in both pesos and dollars, are made in accordance with the following policies:

Investments of Amounts in Pesos

We are obligated, during the structuring and development phase of our financial transactions, to observe and comply with the applicable guidelines issued by the Mexican Government. These include theLineamientos para el manejo de las disponibilidades financieras de las entidades paraestatales de la Administración Pública Federal(Guidelines to Manage Financial Resources of the Public Sector Entities of the Federal Public Administration), issued by the SHCP, which provide that Petróleos Mexicanos may only invest in the following:

 

 (a)securities issued or guaranteed by the Mexican Government;

 

 (b)repurchase agreements structured usingthat use securities issued or guaranteed by the Mexican Government;

 

 (c)time deposits with major financial institutions, the balance of which may not exceed 10% of our cash and cash equivalents; and

 

 (d)shares of mutual funds whose investments are limited to securities issued or guaranteed by the Mexican Government.

In addition to the above limits, repurchase agreements (which are sometimes called repo transactions) may only be entered into with financial institutions that maintain, at a minimum, the following credit ratings as issued by the applicable rating agency:

 

Domestic scale

  

Fitch Ratings

  

S&P

  

Moody’s

Long term

  AA(mex)  mxAA  Aa2.mx

Investments of Financial Resources in Dollars

Investments of amounts in dollars must comply with PEMEX’sour operational and strategic requirements, and must be previously approved byBanco de México on a case-by-case basis. Currently, our investments in dollars are limited to operational accounts, short-term money market funds and time deposits. Our dollar investments are managed byBanco de México.

xico.

Currencies in which Cash and Temporary Investments are Maintained

We generally maintain cash and cash equivalents in pesos and in dollars—the two currencies in which we generate revenues from the domestic and international sales of our products. Similarly, most of our expenses, including those relating to our debt, are payable in these two currencies.

Commitments for Capital Expenditures and Sources of Funding

Our current aggregate commitments for capital expenditures for 20122014 total approximately Ps. 249.9286.7 billion. For a general description of our current commitments for capital expenditures, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development—Capital Expenditures and Investments.”

In 2011,2013, in nominal peso terms, Pemex-Exploration and Production invested a total of Ps. 177.1212.6 billion in capital expenditures on exploration and production. In 2012,2014, Pemex-Exploration and Production has 2326 projects in its capital expenditures budget, for which Ps. 193.0230.9 billion has been budgeted. For more detail on the expenditures for and purpose of these investments, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Exploration and Production—Investments in Exploration and Production.”

Pemex-Refining invested in fivefour infrastructure projects in 20112013 and invested in other general operating projects, strategic planning, acquisition of equipment, research and development and complementary investments for a total of Ps. 25.229.8 billion in capital expenditures in nominal peso terms. In 2012,2014, Pemex-Refining expects to invest Ps. 45.940.7 billion in capital expenditures. For more detail on the expenditures for and purpose of Pemex-Refining’s investments, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Refining—Investments.”

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals invests in projects primarily related to natural gas and condensates processing, transportation and storage. In 2012,2014, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals expects to invest Ps. 6.17.5 billion in capital expenditures, as compared to Ps. 3.05.4 billion of capital expenditures in 2011.2013. For more detail on the expenditures for and purpose of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ investments, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Investments.”

In 2012,2014, Pemex-Petrochemicals expects to invest Ps. 4.25.4 billion in capital expenditures for 10eight projects, as compared to Ps. 2.44.0 billion of capital expenditures in 2011.2013. For more detail on the expenditures for and purpose of Pemex-Petrochemicals’ investments, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Petrochemicals—Investments.”

Our current commitments for capital expenditures have increased in recent years as compared to previous years. Based on past experience, we expect to generate sufficient funds for our working capital, capital expenditures and investments through:

 

cash flow generated by operations;

 

  

the issuance ofCertificados Bursácertificados bursátiles (peso-denominated publicly traded notes) in the Mexican market;

 

the issuance of debt securities in the international capital markets;

 

the renewal of existing lines of credit and the entering into of new lines of credit from international and local commercial banks; and

 

other financing activities.

The securities that we issue may vary in tenor, amount, currency and type of interest rate. We may issue debt securities in U.S. dollars, Japanese yen, euros, pounds, pesos or Swiss francs, among others; these securities may be issued with fixed or floating rates and with maturities of one or more years including perpetual debt

securities, depending on market conditions and funding requirements. We may issue securities in the international capital markets or in the Mexican domestic market, or in both markets. Commercial bank syndicated loans may be established with single or multiple tranches with varying maturities. Bilateral loans may vary in tenor and range, which may be of one year or more. See also “—Financing Activities” below.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, Petróleos Mexicanos had U.S. $3.2$3.3 billion in available lines of credit in order to ensure liquidity. However, the European sovereign debt crisis and resultant market volatility could impact our ability to access the financial markets in 2012. If it does so, we may be required to reduce our budgeted expenditures.liquidity, of which U.S. $3.1 billion was available.

Effective January 1, 2009, in connection with the amendments to the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability described under “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development,” Petróleos Mexicanos assumed primary responsibility for the payment of all indebtedness of the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163, respectively. However, the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163, as applicable, continued to act as servicer of all indebtedness until Petróleos Mexicanos legally assumed, as primary obligor, their indebtedness under the related agreements. These legal assumptions were carried out during the second half of 2009.

Effective January 30, 2009, the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 assigned certain rights to Petróleos Mexicanos in consideration of the cancellation of debt that these entities had issued to Petróleos Mexicanos between 2006 and 2008 pursuant to severalinversiones de disponibilidades (which we refer to as inter-company private placements). The inter-company private placements were debt securities issued by the Master Trust or by Fideicomiso F/163 and purchased by Petróleos Mexicanos at prevailing market conditions. Under this program, which allowed Petróleos Mexicanos to invest part of its cash position in debt securities for use in PIDIREGAS, we were able to obtain significant benefits because the interest rate paid by these entities to Petróleos Mexicanos exceeded the average return on our cash investments. Additionally, the inter-company private placements did not increase our total indebtedness on a consolidated basis since they were eliminated as part of the consolidation process. Petróleos Mexicanos obtained all the required legal and corporate authorizations to establish this program. Through December 31, 2008, the Master Trust had issued U.S. $26.2 billion in debt securities through inter-company private placements to Petróleos Mexicanos and Fideicomiso F/163 had issued an additional Ps. 42.0 billion through inter-company private placements through December 31, 2008. All of these inter-company private placements were canceled effective January 30, 2009, as a result of the changes to the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability that became effective in November 2008.

A number of our financing agreements contain restrictions on (a) our ability to create liens on our assets to secure external indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions, (b) our ability to enter into forward sales of crude oil or natural gas, receivables financings and advance payment arrangements, subject to certain baskets, and (c) our ability to merge or consolidate with other entities or to sell all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, a number of our financing agreements contain eventslongstanding event of default provisions based on the legal framework in effect before the Energy Reform Decree was enacted, including an event of default if the Mexican Government ceases to control Petróleos Mexicanos, or if Petróleos Mexicanos or any of Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining or Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals ceases to have the exclusive right and authority to conduct the petroleum industry on behalf of Mexico. At December 31, 2011We plan to request waivers or consents from our lenders and atbondholders, as necessary, with respect to these provisions once the datesecondary legislation implementing the Energy Reform Decree becomes effective. The secondary legislation implementing the Energy Reform Decree is, however, expected to include, among other things, additional details regarding the contractual regime that will be applicable to us and changes to our corporate structure as part of this report, we were not inPetróleos Mexicanos’ conversion to a productive state-owned company. These changes could cause us to default on anycertain financing agreements in the event that we are unable to obtain waivers from our lenders or bondholders, as applicable. For more information, see “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Considerations Related to Mexico—The effects of our financing agreements.the Energy Reform Decree and its implementation are uncertain but likely to be material.”

In order to be able to carry out our planned capital expenditures program, we will need to seek financing from a variety of sources, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain financing on terms that would be acceptable to us. Our inability to obtain additional financing could have an adverse effect on our planned capital expenditures program and result in our being required to limit or defer this program.

Financing Activities

20122014 Financing Activities.During the period from January 1 to April 30, 2012, Petróleos MexicanosMay 14, 2014, we participated in the following activities:

 

On January 23, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $4,000,000,000 of its debt securities under its U.S. $32,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C in three tranches: (1) U.S. $500,000,000 of its 3.125% Notes due 2019; (2) U.S. $500,000,000 of its 4.875% Notes due 2024, which was a reopening of its 4.875% Notes due 2024 originally issued on July 18, 2013; and (3) U.S. $3,000,000,000 of its 6.375% Bonds due 2045. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On January 23, 2014, the SHCP authorized the increase of the Petróleos Mexicanos’ Medium-Term Notes Program from U.S. $32,000,000,000 to U.S. $42,000,000,000.

On January 30, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos issued Ps. 7,500,000,000 aggregate principal amount ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 at a fixed rate of 7.19%, consisting of (1) an international offering outside of Mexico of Ps. 2,616,050,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles in the form of global depositary notes (or GDNs), and (2) a concurrent offering to the public in Mexico of Ps. 4,883,950,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles not represented by GDNs. The issuance represented the second reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 originally issued on September 26, 2013 and reopened on December 11, 2013. Concurrently, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 5,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount ofCertificados Bursátiles in two tranches: one at a floating rate for Ps. 2,000,000,000 due 2019, which was a reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 originally issued on September 19, 2013 and reopened on December 11, 2013; and the second at a fixed rate of 3.94% for UDI equivalent to Ps. 2,999,999,997.62 due 2026. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On March 10, 2014, Pemex-Exploration and Production obtained a letter of credit for Ps. 513,809,939 that matures on May 9, 2014.

On March 20, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed U.S. $1,000,000,000 from its revolving credit line, which bears interest at a floating rate linked to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and matures on May 22, 2014.

On March 21, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a loan for U.S. $300,000,000 from an export credit agency, which bears interest at a rate of 2.351% and matures in March 2018.

On April 16, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos issued €1,000,000,000 of its 3.75% Notes due 2026. These notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $42,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Between January 1 and May 14, 2014, P.M.I. Holdings B.V. obtained U.S. $530,000,000 from its revolving credit line and repaid U.S. $1,080,000,000. As of April 30, 2014, there was no outstanding balance under this facility.

2013 Financing Activities. During the period from January 1 to December 31, 2013, we participated in the following activities:

On January 22, 2013, the SHCP authorized the increase of the Petróleos Mexicanos’ Medium-Term Notes Program from U.S. $22,000,000,000 to U.S. $32,000,000,000.

On January 30, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $2,100,000,000 of its 3.500% Notes due 2023. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $32,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On January 4 and 11, 2013, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained and repaid, respectively, a loan for U.S. $150,000,000 bearing interest at 1.0412%.

On February 28, 2013, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. obtained two loans for U.S. $34,500,000, each of which bears interest at 3.80% and matures on February 7, 2023.

On March 22, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 2,500,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2017 at a floating rate, which was the first reopening of the securities originally issued on November 29, 2012. These certificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On March 6 and 8, 2013, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained and repaid, respectively, a loan for U.S. $50,000,000 bearing interest at 1.4217%.

On April 26, 2013, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. obtained a loan for U.S. $33,830,338 bearing interest at 3.80%, which matures on February 22, 2023.

On June 7, 2013, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. obtained a loan for U.S. $34,277,705 bearing interest at 3.80%, which matures on April 24, 2023.

On June 25, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 2,500,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2017 at a floating rate, which was the second reopening of the securities originally issued on November 29, 2012. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On June 26, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed U.S. $500,000,000 under its revolving credit facility with Credit Agricole CIB, which was repaid on July 17, 2013.

On July 18, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $3,000,000,000 of its debt securities under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $32,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C in four tranches: (1) U.S. $1,000,000,000 of its 4.875% Notes due 2024; (2) U.S. $1,000,000,000 of its 3.500% Notes due 2018; (3) U.S. $500,000,000 of its Floating Rate Notes due 2018; and (4) U.S. $500,000,000 of its 6.500% Bonds due 2041, which was the second reopening of its 6.500% Bonds due 2041 originally issued on June 2, 2011 and subsequently reopened on October 18, 2011. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On September 19, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $400,000,000 of notes due 2024, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.830%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

On September 19, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 5,000,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 at a floating rate. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On September 26, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued Ps. 10,400,000,000 aggregate amount ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 at a fixed rate of 7.19%, consisting of (1) an international offering outside Mexico of Ps. 1,075,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles in the form of GDNs, and (2) a concurrent offering to the public in Mexico of Ps. 9,325,000,000 of Certificados Bursátiles not represented by GDNs. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On September 30, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $750,000,000 of notes due 2024, which bear interest at LIBOR for 3 months plus 0.43%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

On November 4, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $350,000,000 of notes due 2024, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.290%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

On November 27, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued €1,300,000,000 of its 3.125% Notes due 2020. These notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $32,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On December 11, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued Ps. 8,500,000,000 aggregate principal amount ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 at a fixed rate of 7.19%, consisting of (1) an international offering outside of Mexico of Ps. 1,165,550,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles in the form of global depository notes (GDNs), and (2) a concurrent offering to the public in Mexico of Ps. 7,334,450,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles not represented by GDNs. The issuance represented the first reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 originally issued on September 26, 2013. Concurrently, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 1,100,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 at a floating rate, which was a reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 originally issued on September 19, 2013. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On December 11, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a revolving credit facility in the amount of U.S. $1,250,000,000; the facility bears interest at a floating rate linked to LIBOR and matures in 2016.

On December 19, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed Ps. 10,000,000,000 from its revolving credit facility with Banco Santander, S.A., which it repaid on December 30, 2013.

On December 27, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed U.S. $135,000,000 from its revolving credit facility with Credit Agricole CIB, which it repaid on January 27, 2014.

From January 1 to December 31, 2013, P.M.I. Holdings B.V. obtained U.S. $5,793,000,000 from its revolving credit line and repaid U.S. $6,143,000,000.

2012 Financing Activities. During the period from January 1 to December 31, 2012, we participated in the following activities:

On January 24, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $2,100,000,000 of its 4.875% Notes due 2022. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

 

On February 14, 2012, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. obtained four direct loans for a total amount of U.S. $151,945,213$143,945,213 bearing interest at 3.50%, all of which mature in December 2021.

 

On March 12, 2012, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. obtained a direct loan for U.S. $37,997,960 bearing interest at 3.8%, which matures on January 27, 2022.

 

On March 28, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for U.S. $125,000,000 bearing interest at 1.8635%, which was repaid on April 12, 2012.

 

On March 29, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for Ps. 1,300,000,000 bearing interest at 5.264%, which was repaid on April 12, 2012.

 

On April 10, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued CHF 300,000,000 of its 2.50% Notes due 2019. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

 

Between January 1 and April 30, 2012, P.M.I. Holdings B.V. obtained U.S. $5,774,000,000 from its revolving credit line and repaid U.S. $4,874,000.000.

On April 26, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued A $150,000,000AUD 150,000,000 of its 6.125% Notes due 2017. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

2011 Financing Activities.During the period from January 1 to December 31, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained U.S. $1,081.8 million in nominal terms in loans or credit lines made or guaranteed by export credit agencies for use in financing its investment program. In addition, we participated in the following activities:

 

On February 24, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos made a final borrowing of Ps. 3,750,000,000 under its Ps. 3,750,000,000 revolving credit facility entered into in September 2009, which accrued interest at a floating rate. The facility matured in August 2011.

On March 15, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 10,000,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátilesat a floating rate, which mature in 2016. These Certificados Bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 140,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On May 11, 2011, P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. obtained a bank loan for U.S. $39,000,000 at a floating rate, which matures on May 11, 2021. As of December 31, 2011, the amount outstanding under this loan was U.S. $37,245,000.

On May 16, 2011,2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a bank loan for Ps. 2,352,000,000405,000,000 bearing interest at 5.070%, which maturedwas repaid on May 18, 2012.

On May 16, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for Ps. 2,329,000,000 bearing interest at 5.050%, which was repaid on May 23, 2012.

On May 31, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for Ps. 2,833,000,000 bearing interest at 5.160%, which was repaid on June 16, 2011.

6, 2012.

 

On June 2, 2011,26, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,250,000,000$1,750,000,000 of its 6.500%5.50% Bonds due 2041.2044. The bonds were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On June 15, 2011, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. obtained a U.S. $1,000,000,000 syndicated revolving credit line with international banks and Credit Agricole CIB as administrative agent. During 2011, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. borrowed U.S. $3,133,000,000 and repaid U.S. $2,383,000,000 under this facility. As of December 31, 2011, the amount outstanding under this facility was U.S. $750,000,000.

 

On July 6, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued two series of notes in the amount of U.S. $400,000,000 each, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.0% and 1.95%, respectively, and mature in December 2022. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

On July 18, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a bilateral export credit agency loan for U.S. $300,000,000, which bears interest at a floating rate linked to LIBOR and matures in July 2017.

On July 26, 2011,2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $400,000,000 of notes maturing December 2022, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 1.70%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

On July 5 and 6, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained and repaid, respectively, a loan for U.S. $40,000,000 bearing interest at a rate of 1.6981%.

On October 19, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,000,000,000 of its 5.50% NotesBonds due 2021; this2044, which was a reopening of the July 21, 2010 issuance, and the notes werebonds issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

During 2011, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. borrowed and repaid an aggregate amount of U.S. $2,689,000,000 under its U.S. $500,000,000 syndicated revolving credit line with international banks and Credit Agricole CIB, as administrative agent. As of December 31, 2011, no amount was outstanding under this facility.

On September 1, 2011, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. borrowed €799,252,000 at a floating rate under a syndicated loan due in August 2014, which was used to partially finance the acquisition of the Repsol shares described above under “Item 4—Information on the Company—PEMEX Corporate Matters—Investment in Repsol” and “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Instruments Entered Into for Trading Purposes.”June 26, 2012. The loan is secured by the shares acquired, and will amortize in three equal installments due on the first through third anniversary dates of the transaction.

On September 9, 2011, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. obtained a bank loan for Ps. 50,000,000 bearing interest at 4.91%, which matured on November 8, 2011.

On September 12, 2011, the CNBV authorized Petróleos Mexicanos to increase itsCertificados BursátilesDual Program from Ps. 140,000,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs to Ps. 200,000,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs.

Effective September 14, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into amendments to its U.S. $2,000,000,000 syndicated term credit facility and U.S. $1,250,000,000 revolving credit facility, each originally entered into on November 18, 2010, to reduce the margin over LIBOR for borrowings thereunder and, in the case of the revolving credit facility, to reduce the commitment fees payable thereunder, in each case to reflect improved market conditions. During 2011, no amount was borrowed by Petróleos Mexicanos, under the syndicated revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2011, no debt was outstanding under the syndicated revolving credit facility and U.S. $2,000,000,000 (originally borrowed in 2010) remained outstanding under the syndicated term credit facility.

On October 3, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the domestic Mexican market, Ps. 9,999,999,903 ofCertificados Bursátilesin two tranches: one at a floating rate for Ps. 7,000,000,000, which matures in 2017, and the second at a fixed rate of 3.55% for 653,380,800 UDIs, equivalent to Ps. 2,999,999,903, which matures in 2021. TheCertificados Bursátileswere issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 200,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados BursátilesDual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On October 18, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,250,000,000 of its 6.500% Bonds due 2041; this was a reopening of the June 2, 2011 issuance, and the bonds were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining andPemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals. In connection with the issuance of these bonds,

On October 30, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a registration rights agreement under which it agreed to use its best efforts to conduct an SEC-registered exchange offer with respect to the bonds. The new bonds issuedrevolving credit facility in the exchange offer will be consolidatedamount of U.S. $1,250,000,000; the facility bears interest at a floating rate linked to formLIBOR and matures in 2017. No disbursements have been made under this facility.

On November 16, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a single series with the 6.500% Bonds due 2041 issued by Petróleos Mexicanos in October 2011, referred to in the preceding paragraph.loan for U.S. $50,000,000 bearing interest at 1.0272%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

  

On December 7, 2011,November 23, 2012, the CNBV authorized Petróleos Mexicanos to increase itsCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program from Ps. 200,000,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs to Ps. 300,000,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs.

On November 28, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for U.S. $70,000,000 bearing interest at 1.0332%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

On November 29, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for U.S. $45,000,000 bearing interest at 1.0362%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

On November 29, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for Ps. 806,000,000 bearing interest at 5.0462%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

On November 29, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 10,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.650%Certificados Bursátiles due 2021, consisting of (i) an international offering outside Mexico of Ps. 7,000,000,00024,999,999,578 ofCertificados Bursátiles in three tranches: one at a floating rate for Ps. 11,500,000,000, which matures in 2017; the formsecond at a fixed rate of global depositary notes (GDNs),3.02% for 721,564,000 UDIs, equivalent to Ps. 3,499,999,578, which matures in 2028; and (ii)the third at a concurrent offering tofixed rate for Ps. 10,000,000,000, which was a reopening of the publicsecurities issued on December 7, 2011 and matures in Mexico of Ps. 3,000,000,000 of2021. TheseCertificados Bursácertificados bursátilesnot represented by GDNs. TheCertificados Bursátileswere issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 200,000,000,000300,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

 

On December 22, 2011,21, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a revolving credit facilitydirect loan in the domestic market for Ps. 10,000,000,000. No disbursements have been made under this facility.

2,000,000,000 bearing interest at 6.55%, which matures on December 21, 2022.

 

On December 29, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a bank loan for U.S. $200,000,000 at a floating rate, which matures in December 2016.

On December 29, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained, in the Mexican market, a bank loan for Ps. 7,000,000,000, which matures in December 2016. Of the total amount available, Ps. 3,500,000,000 had been disbursed as of December 31, 2011.

Other Transactions in 2011.On October 4, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $964,340,000 of 5.50% Notes due 2021 and U.S. $1,229,880,000 of 6.500% Bonds due 2041 in exchange for an equal principal amount of its outstanding 5.50% Notes due 2021 and 6.500% Bonds due 2041, respectively, in an SEC-registered exchange offer.

2010 Financing Activities. During the period from January 1 to December 31, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained U.S. $2,997 million in nominal terms in loans made or guaranteed by export credit agencies for use in financing its investment program. In addition, we participated in the following activities:

On January 7, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained, in the Mexican market, a bank loan for a total of Ps. 3,750,000,000 at a floating rate. The loan matured in September 2011.

On January 14, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos increased the aggregate amount of debt securities issuable under its Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C, to U.S. $12,000,000,000.

On February 5, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,000,000,000 of its 6.000% Notes due 2020; the notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $12,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On February 8, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 14,999,999,920 ofCertificados Bursátilesin three tranches: one at a floating rate for Ps. 7,959,779,500, which matures in 2015; the second at a fixed rate for Ps. 5,000,000,000, which matures in 2020; and the third at a fixed rate for 465,235,800 UDIs (equivalent to Ps. 2,040,220,420), which matures in 2020. TheseCertificados Bursátileswere issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 140,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados BursátilesDual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On February 26, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued CHF 150,000,000 of its 3.50% Notes due 2014; the issuance was a reopening, and the notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $12,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On May 17, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 14,999,999,984 ofCertificados Bursátilesin three tranches: one at a floating rate for Ps. 8,500,000,000, which matures in 2014; the second at a fixed rate for Ps. 5,000,000,000, which matures in nine years, nine months (a reopening of a fixed rate tranche issued in February 2010); and the third at a fixed rate for

337,670,900 UDIs (equivalent to Ps. 1,499,999,984), which matures in nine years, nine months (a reopening of a second fixed rate tranche issued in February 2010). TheseCertificados Bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 140,000,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados BursátilesDual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On June 24, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed U.S. $990,000,000 under a syndicated revolving credit facility established on September 7, 2007 and repaid this amount in July 2010.

On July 21, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $2,000,000,000 of 5.50% Notes due 2021; the notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $12,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On August 30, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,000,000,000 of its 6.625% Bonds due 2035. The issuance was a reopening, and the bonds were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $12,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On September 28, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $750,000,000 of its 6.625% Perpetual Bonds; the bonds were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $12,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On October 20, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $250,000,000 of its 6.625% Perpetual Bonds. The issuance was a reopening, and the bonds were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $12,000,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On November 18, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a revolving credit facility in the amount of U.S. $1,250,000,000; the facility bears interest at a floating rate linked to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The facility matures in 2013 and can be extended twice for a period of one year per extension with the agreement of the lenders. As of December 31, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos had not utilized this credit facility.

On November 18, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a credit facility in the amount of U.S. $2,000,000,000; the facility bears interest at a floating rate linked to LIBOR and matures in 2016. As of December 10, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos had utilized the full amount of this credit facility.

On December 22, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos increased the aggregate amount of debt securities issuable under its Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C, to U.S. $22,000,000,000.

In January 2010,2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a syndicatedloan for Ps. 2,600,000,000 bearing interest at 5.0475%, which was repaid on January 11, 2013.

On December 31, 2012, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. obtained a loan for U.S. $50,000,000 bearing interest at 1.4574%, which was repaid on January 14, 2013.

During 2012, P.M.I. Holdings B.V. obtained U.S. $18,225,000,000 from its revolving credit line with international banks and Credit Agricole CIB, as administrative agent. The objective of this U.S. $500,000,000 credit line is to finance the trading activities of P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. During 2010, P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. borrowed and repaid an aggregate amount of U.S. $4,885,000,000 under this facility, although no more than U.S. $450,000,000 was outstanding at any time.$17,325,000,000. As of December 31, 2010, no debt was2012, the amount outstanding under this credit line.

In addition, on October 12, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos redeemedfacility was U.S. $1,740,402,000 principal amount of its outstanding 7.75% Guaranteed Perpetual Bonds, which were originally issued on September 28, 2004 by the Master Trust.

$900,000,000.

In 2009, 2010 and 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos undertook the following activities to comply with the amendments to the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability, which became effective in November 2008:

 

As a result of the elimination of PEMEX’sour PIDIREGAS program, the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 did not enter into any financings in 2009, 2010 or 2011.

2011, when the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 were dissolved.

 

As of January 31, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos recognized all PIDIREGAS-related financings as direct public debt for governmental accounting and budgeting purposes.

 

During the second half of 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos, the Master Trust, Fideicomiso F/163 and the relevant counterparties entered into assignment agreements and other similar agreements by which Petróleos Mexicanos assumed, as primary obligor, all of the rights and obligations of the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 related to their respective financings, including bond issuances and banking arrangements.

 

On October 29, 2009, the CNBV authorized Petróleos Mexicanos to increase itsCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program from Ps. 70,000,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs to Ps. 140,000,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs, which allowed Petróleos Mexicanos to issue short-term notes.

Petróleos Mexicanos requested and obtained the authorization of the CNBV and BMV to conduct a public exchange offer for the voluntary acquisition and the assumption of the corresponding obligations under the seven series of publicly traded notes issued by Fideicomiso F/163. At a meeting in October 2009, the holders of these series of notes approved the cancellation of the notes, subject to the completion of the public offering described above. In December 2009, once the public offer was completed, the CNBV authorized the cancellation of the notes issued by Fideicomiso F/163 from the National Registry of Securities and Petróleos Mexicanos issued, as primary obligor, new publicly traded notes under the same terms and conditions as those originally issued by Fideicomiso F/163.

 

By December 31, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos had effectively assumed all of the debt obligations of the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163, which now constitute direct debt obligations of Petróleos Mexicanos as primary obligor.

 

On August 16, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos dissolved Fideicomiso F/163.

 

On December 20, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos dissolved the Master Trust.

The following table sets forth the analysis of our total indebtedness (not including accrued interest) as of December 31, 20112013 based on short-and long-term debt and fixed or floating rates:

 

   In millions of
U.S. dollars
 

Short-term debt

  

Short-term bonds with floating interest rates

  U.S. $1,6141,524  

Lines of credit with variable interest rates established under committed credit facilities with various international commercial banks

   4,2402,571  

Lines of credit with fixed interest rates

   1,4292,089  
  

 

 

 

Total short-term debt

  U.S. $7,2836,184  
  

 

 

 

Long-term debt

  

Fixed rate instruments

  

Instruments with fixed annual interest rates ranging from 2.0%1.32810% to 11.0%10.61% and maturities ranging from 20132015 to 20412044 and perpetual bonds with no maturity date

  U.S. $ 31,72545,694  

Variable rate instruments

  

Drawings under lines of credit based on LIBOR and other variable rates with maturities ranging from 20132015 to 20202022

   11,3686,276  

Floating rate notes with maturities ranging from 20132014 to 2020

   4,9605,428  
  

 

 

 

Total variable rate instruments

   16,32811,704  
  

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

   48,05357,398  
  

 

 

 

Total indebtedness(1)

  U.S. $55,33563,582  
  

 

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Excludes U.S. $615.2$751.0 million of accrued interest and includes notes payable to contractors.

The table below sets forth our total indebtedness as of December 31 for each of the fivethree years from 2007 to 2011.2011-2013.

Total Indebtedness of PEMEX

 

 As of December 31,(1)   As of December 31,(1) 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011   2011   2012   2013 
 (in millions of U.S. dollars)(2)   (in millions of U.S. dollars)(2) 

Domestic debt in various currencies

 U.S.  $9,227   U.S.  $7,204   U.S.  $9,522   U.S.  $10,697   U.S.  $10,092    U.S. $10,093    U.S. $11,749    U.S. $12,709  

External debt in various currencies(3)

           

Bonds(4)

  20,766    19,114    23,766    23,760    26,898  

Direct bank loans(5)

  7,263    6,918    5,226    6,947    7,197  

Export credit agency loans (project finance)(6)

  7,605    8,022    7,930    9,525    9,033  

Bonds(4)

   26,925     32,831     39,654  

Direct loans(5)

   7,197     5,792     3,848  

Project financing(6)

   9,032     7,583     5,977  

Financial leases

      435    293    271    243     243     178     302  

Notes payable to contractors

  1,227    1,120    1,134    1,995    1,872     1,872     1,656     1,092  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total external debt

 U.S.  $36,861   U.S.  $35,609   U.S.  $38,348   U.S.  $42,498   U.S.  $45,243    U.S. $45,269    U.S. $48,040    U.S. $50,873  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total indebtedness(7)

 U.S.  $46,087   U.S.  $42,815   U.S.  $47,871   U.S.  $53,195   U.S.  $55,335  

Total indebtedness

  U.S. $55,362    U.S. $59,789    U.S. $63,582  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Figures do not include accrued interest. Accrued interest was U.S. $5.4$615.2 million, U.S. $522.4 million, U.S. $515 million, U.S. $598$691.6 million and U.S. $615.2$751.0 million at December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 20102011, 2012 and 2011,2013, respectively.
(2)Indebtedness payable in currencies other than U.S. dollars was first converted into pesos for accounting purposes at the exchange rates set byBanco de México and then converted from pesos to U.S. dollars at the following exchange rates: Ps. 10.8662 = U.S. $1.00 for 2007, Ps. 13.5383 = U.S. $1.00 for 2008, Ps. 13.0587 = U.S. $1.00 for 2009, Ps. 12.3571 = U.S. $1.00 for 2010 and Ps. 13.9904 = U.S. $1.00 for 2011.2011, Ps. 13.0101 = U.S. $1.00 for 2012 and Ps. 13.0765 = U.S. $1.00 for 2013. See Notes 3 and 1112 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(3)Indebtedness payable other than in pesos and owed to persons or institutions having their head offices or chief places of business outside of Mexico, and payable outside the territory of Mexico.
(4)Includes, as of December 31, 2007,2011, 2012 and 2013, U.S. $1.37 billion of 4.5% Guaranteed Exchangeable Bonds due 2011 issued by RepCon Lux, S.A. (redeemed in 2008) and, as of December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, U.S. $1.5$0.6 billion, U.S. $1.2 billion, U.S. $0.9 billion, U.S. $0.7$0.58 billion and U.S. $0.6$0.49 billion, respectively, of bonds issued by Pemex Finance, Ltd. See “—Financing Activities of Pemex Finance, Ltd.” below.
(5)Includes, U.S. $2.5 billion of indebtedness of the Master Trust under a syndicated revolving credit facility as of December 31, 20072011, 2012 and U.S. $1.5 billion under this facility as of December 31, 2008, and indebtedness of the Master Trust consisting of trade financing advances from commercial banks of U.S. $4.25 billion as of each of December 31, 2007 and 2008. As of December 31, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos had legally assumed these obligations. Also includes, as of December 31, 2010 and 2011,2013, U.S. $2.0 billion outstanding under syndicated credit facilities entered into in November 2010 and amended in September 2011.
(6)Includes U.S. $7,411 million and U.S. $7,904 million of indebtedness of the Master Trust as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos had legally assumed these obligations. All credits included in this line are insured or guaranteed by export credit agencies.
(7)Includes U.S. $32.1 billion and U.S. $32.2 billion of indebtedness of the Master Trust as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and U.S. $9.0 billion and U.S. $7.0 billion of indebtedness of Fideicomiso F/163 as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos had legally assumed these obligations.

Source: PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements.statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Financing Activities of Pemex Finance, Ltd.

Commencing on December 1, 1998, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, PMI and P.M.I. Services, B.V. have entered into several agreements with Pemex Finance, Ltd. Under these contracts, Pemex Finance, Ltd. purchases certain existing PMI accounts receivable for crude oil as well as certain accounts receivable to be generated in the future by PMI related to crude oil. The receivables sold are those generated by the sale of Maya and Altamira crude oil to designated customers in the United States, Canada and Aruba. The net proceeds obtained by Pemex-Exploration and Production from the sale of such receivables under the agreements are utilized for capital expenditures. Pemex Finance, Ltd. obtains resources for the acquisition of such accounts receivable through the placement of debt instruments in the international markets.

On July 1, 2005, we entered into an option agreement with BNP Paribas Private Bank and Trust Cayman Limited giving us an option to acquire 100% of the shares of Pemex Finance, Ltd. As a result, the financial results of Pemex Finance, Ltd., under Mexican FRSIFRS are consolidated into our financial statements, and PMI’s sales of accounts receivable to Pemex Finance, Ltd. have been reclassified as debt. Our option to purchase the shares of Pemex Finance, Ltd. can only be exercised once its remaining debt, approximately U.S. $615$490.8 million in aggregate principal amount as of December 31, 2011,2013, has been redeemed.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, the outstanding debt of Pemex Finance, Ltd. was composed of U.S. $450$437.5 million aggregate principal amount of fixed rate notes with maturities in 2017 and 2018 and interest rates between 9.15% and 10.61%, and U.S. $165$53.3 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes maturing in 2014 and accrued interest of U.S. $6.3$5.6 million. On February 15, 2011, notes with a 9.03% interest rate matured.

20122014 Financing Activities. During the first four months of 2012,2014, Pemex Finance, Ltd. made payments of U.S. $8.3$43.3 million in principal of its notes. Pemex Finance, Ltd. did not incur any additional indebtedness during the first four months of 2012.2014.

20112013 Financing Activities. During 2011,2013, Pemex Finance, Ltd. made payments of U.S. $65$90.8 million in principal of its notes. Pemex Finance, Ltd. did not incur any additional indebtedness during 2011.2013.

20102012 Financing Activities. During 2010,2012, Pemex Finance, Ltd. made payments of U.S. $213.3$33.3 million in principal of its notes. Pemex Finance, Ltd. did not incur any additional indebtedness during 2010.

2012.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information about our long-term contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements outstanding as of December 31, 20112013 is set forth below. This information is important in understanding our financial position. In considering the economic viability of investment opportunities, we view any source of financing, for example, operating leases or sales of future accounts receivable, as being economically equivalent to consolidated debt.

Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 20112013(1)

 

 

 

 Payments due by period    Payments due by period 
 Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years After
5 years
  Total Less than 1
year
 1-3 years 4-5 years After 5 years 
 (in millions of U.S. dollars)  (in millions of U.S. dollars) 

Contractual obligations recognized in balance sheet:

          

Debt(2)

 U.S.  $53,220.3   U.S.  $6,314.6   U.S.  $10,238.7   U.S.  $10,037.4   U.S.  $26,629.6   U.S. $62,938   U.S. $6,251   U.S. $10,830   U.S. $10,167   U.S. $35,690  

Notes payable to contractors(3)

  1,871.8    939.2    683.9    105.5    143.2    1,092    643    305    51    93  

Capital lease obligations(4)

  243.4    29.1    51.6    79.2    83.5    302    40    86    95    81  

Other long-term liabilities:

          

Dismantlement and abandonment costs obligations(5)

  3,038.3    83.1    373.8    420.5    2,160.9    3,527    91    555    798    2,083  

Employee benefits plan(6)

  52,251.3    2,604.3    5,337.1    6,440.0    37,869.9    85,589    3,921    8,126    9,637    63,905  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total contractual obligations recognized in balance sheet

  110,625.1    9,970.3    16,685.1    17,082.6    66,887.1    153,448    10,946    19,902    20,748    101,852  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other contractual obligations not recognized in liabilities:

          

Infrastructure works contracts(7)

  25,034.8    11,892.4    9,600.4    1,879.3    1,662.7    48,236    21,939    17,047    4,518    4,732  

Financed Public Works Contracts (FPWC)(8)

  4,547.2    1,307.0    1,847.6    1,392.6    0.0    2,202    982    336    330    554  

Nitrogen supply contracts(9)

  1,098.6    185.1    231.9    191.5    490.1    796    112    195    101    388  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total contractual obligations not recognized in liabilities(10)

  30,680.6    13,384.5    11,679.9    3,463.4    2,152.8  

Total contractual obligations not recognized in liabilities(10)

  51,234    23,033    17,578    4,949    5,674  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total contractual obligations

 U.S.  $141,305.7   U.S.  $23,354.8   U.S.  $28,365.0   U.S.  $20,546.0   U.S.  $69,039.9   U.S. $204,682   U.S. $33,979   U.S. $37,480   U.S. $25,697   U.S. $107,526  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)All amounts calculated in accordance with Mexican FRS.IFRS.

(2)See Note 1112 to our consolidated financial statements included herein. Figures in this line item do not include notes payable to contractors and capital lease obligations, which are presented in separate line items, but do include accrued interest as of December 31, 2011.2012.
(3)See Note 1112 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(4)See Notes 11 and 21 II(e)Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(5)See Notes 3(p)3(l) and 10(c) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(6)See Note 1314 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(7)See Note 16(f)22(g) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(8)The amounts presented for Financed Public Works Contracts in this table correspond to works the performance and delivery of which by the relevant contractors are pending. For more information on the FPWC program, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Pemex-Exploration and Production—Financed Public Works Contracts” and Note 16(d)22(d) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(9)See Notes 16(b)22(b) and (c) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(10)No amounts have been included for Integrated E&P Contracts in this table, since payments for these contracts will be made on a per-barrel basis and performance and delivery by the relevant contractors is pending. For more information on the Integrated E&P Contracts program, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Pemex-Exploration and Production—Integrated Exploration and Production Contracts” and Note 16(e)22(e) to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Source: PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements.statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements of the type that we are required to disclose under Item 5.E of Form 20-F.

See “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Instruments Entered into for Trading Purposes” for more information regarding the fair value of our derivative contracts in connection with natural gas trading activities as of December 31, 2011.2013.

Results of Operations by Business Segment

This section presents results of our operations by business segment, including our central corporate operations and the operations of the consolidated subsidiary companies.

Revenue by Business Segment

The following table sets forth our trade and intersegment net sales revenues by business segment for the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 as well as the percentage change in sales revenues for the years 2009 to 2011.those years.

 

 Year Ended December 31, 2010
vs.  2009
  2011
vs.  2010
   Year Ended December 31, 2012
vs. 2011
  2013
vs. 2012
 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011   2011 2012 2013 
 (in millions of pesos)(1) (%) (%)   (in millions of pesos)(1) (%) (%) 

Exploration and Production

       

Exploration and Production

  

   

Trade sales(2)

                            

Trade sales(2)

                     

Intersegment sales

  Ps.       912,295    Ps.  1,137,807    Ps.     827,653    Ps.     980,603    Ps.  1,270,840    18.5    29.6    Ps.1,270,840   Ps.1,333,286   Ps.1,250,772    4.9    (6.2
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net sales

  912,295    1,137,807    827,653    980,603    1,270,840    18.5    29.6     1,270,840    1,333,286    1,250,772    4.9    (6.2

Refining

             

Trade sales(2)(3)

  433,604    490,556    469,614    537,192    625,297    14.4    16.4  

Trade sales(2)(3)

   625,297    725,235    744,497    16.0    2.7  

Intersegment sales

  42,230    56,992    61,001    68,865    75,155    12.9    9.1     75,155    61,480    74,894    (18.2  21.8  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net sales

  475,834    547,548    530,615    606,057    700,452    14.2    15.6     700,452    786,715    819,391    12.3    4.2  

Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

             

Trade sales(2)

  139,963    167,108    111,245    125,392    129,748    12.7    3.5  

Trade sales(2)(3)

   129,773    119,490    145,471    (7.9  21.7  

Intersegment sales

  82,941    104,028    60,723    74,065    77,480    22.0    4.6     77,480    66,227    73,998    (14.5  11.7  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net sales

  222,904    271,136    171,968    199,457    207,228    16.0    3.9     207,253    185,717    219,469    (10.4  18.2  

Petrochemicals

             

Trade sales(2)

  21,702    25,576    18,885    24,739    28,855    31.0    16.6  

Trade sales(2)

   28,855    27,760    26,525    (3.8  (4.4

Intersegment sales

  35,942    54,482    31,069    16,587    14,583    (46.6  (12.1   14,583    7,650    13,840    (47.5  80.9  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net sales

  57,644    80,057    49,954    41,326    43,438    (17.3  5.1     43,438    35,411    40,365    (18.5  14.0  

Corporate and subsidiary companies

       

Trade sales(2)(3)

  543,988    645,710    490,176    594,742    774,529    21.3    30.2  

Trading Companies

      

Trade sales(2)(3)

   773,907    773,426    688,464    (0.1  (11.0

Intersegment sales

   424,018    448,732    407,664    5.8    (9.2
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net sales

   1,197,926    1,222,158    1,096,129    2.0    (10.3

Corporate and other subsidiary companies

      

Trade sales(2)(3)

   621    1,000    3,247    61.0    224.7  

Intersegment sales and eliminations

  (1,073,408  (1,353,309  (980,445  (1,140,120  (1,438,058  16.3    26.1     (1,862,076  (1,917,374  (1,821,168  (3.0  5.0  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net sales

  (529,420  (707,599  (490,270  (545,379  (663,529  11.2    21.7     (1,861,455  (1,916,374  (1,817,921  (3.0  5.1  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net sales

  Ps.   1,139,257    Ps.  1,328,950    Ps.  1,089,921    Ps.  1,282,064    Ps.  1,558,429    17.6    21.6    Ps.1,558,454   Ps.1,646,912   Ps.1,608,205    5.7    (2.4
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Figures for 2007 are stated in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. Figures for 2008, 2009, 20102011, 2012 and 20112013 are stated in nominal pesos. See “Item 3—Key Information—Selected Financial Data.”
(2)Sales to external customers.
(3)Includes services income.

Source: PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements.statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Income by Business Segment

The following table sets forth our net income (loss) by business segment for each year in the five-yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2011,2013, as well as the percentage change in income for the years 20092011 to 2011.2013.

 

 Year Ended December 31, 2010
vs. 2009
  2011
vs. 2010
  Year Ended December 31, 2012
vs. 2011
 2013
vs. 2012
 
 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011  2011 2012 2013 (%) (%) 
 (in millions of pesos)(1) (%) (%)  (in millions of pesos)(1)   

Business Segment

            

Exploration and Production

  Ps.    19,966    Ps.      23,473    Ps.      5,436    Ps.    34,367    Ps.    58,989    532.2    71.6   Ps.28,813   Ps.93,982   Ps.(42,084  226.2    (144.8

Refining

  (45,654  (118,917  (92,340  (82,713  (139,491  10.4    (68.6  (131,873  (102,098  (123,015  22.6    (20.5

Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

  4,958    2,637    (1,128  3,772    (1,531  434.4    (140.6  (3,347  1,613    3,909    148.2    142.3  

Petrochemicals

  (16,086  (18,348  (19,883  (14,753  (12,720  25.8    13.8    (6,256  (11,270  (14,936  (80.1  (32.5

Corporate and subsidiary companies(2)

  18,508    332    13,545    12,800    3,270    (5.5  (74.5

Trading Companies

  3,821    7,108    2,973    86.0    (58.2

Corporate and other subsidiary companies(2)

  1,900    13,265    3,094    598.2    (76.7
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total net income (loss)

  Ps.  (18,308  Ps.  (110,823  Ps.  (94,370  Ps.  (46,527  Ps.  (91,483  (50.7  (96.6 Ps. (106,942 Ps.2,600   Ps. (170,058  102.4    (6,640.7
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)Figures for 2007 are stated in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. Figures for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 are stated in nominal pesos. See “Item 3—Key Information—Selected Financial Data.”
(2)Includes intersegment eliminations.

Source: PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements.statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS.

20112013 Compared to 20102012

Exploration and Production

In 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s sales of crude oil to the PMI Group decreased by 11.3% in peso terms and decreased by 8.7% in U.S. dollar terms, each as compared to 2012, mainly due to a decrease in the volume of crude oil exports. The weighted average price of crude oil sold byPemex-Exploration and Production to the PMI Group for export was U.S. $98.54 in 2013, as compared to U.S. $101.86 in 2012. Total intersegment sales, which include sales to Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and the PMI Group, decreased by 6.2%, principally as a result of the decrease in crude oil export prices. Net income related to exploration and production activities decreased by 144.8%, or Ps. 136,066 million, from Ps. 93,982 million in 2012 to a loss of Ps. 42,084 million in 2013, primarily as a result of a decrease in the average price of crude oil.

Refining

In 2013, trade sales related to refining activities (including services income) increased by 2.7%, from Ps. 725,235 million in 2012 to Ps. 744,497 million in 2013, due to an increase in the average sales prices of petroleum products. Intersegment sales increased by Ps. 13,414 million, or 21.8%, from Ps. 61,480 million in 2012 to Ps. 74,894 million in 2013, mainly due to an increase in the volume of petroleum products sold. In 2013, our total loss related to refining activities was Ps. 123,015 million, 20.5% higher than the loss of Ps. 102,098 million in 2012. The increase in loss was primarily due to a decrease in other revenues, net, during 2013 primarily due to a lower credit attributable to the negative IEPS tax rate in 2013 as compared to 2012.

Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

In 2013, trade sales related to the natural gas and basic petrochemical business segment (including services income) increased by 21.7%, from Ps. 119,490 million in 2012 to Ps. 145,471 million in 2013. LPG sales increased by 10.4%, from Ps. 64,424 million in 2012 to Ps. 71,148 million in 2013, principally due to an increase in LPG prices. Natural gas sales increased by 38.1%, from Ps. 51,250 million in 2012 to Ps. 70,781 million in 2013, mainly due to an increase in the volume and prices of natural gas. Net income related to natural gas and basic petrochemicals increased by 142.3%, or Ps. 2,296 million, from a gain of Ps. 1,613 million in 2012 to a gain of Ps. 3,909 million in 2013, mainly due to an increase in domestic sales.

Petrochemicals

In 2013, trade sales related to the petrochemicals business segment decreased by 4.4%, from Ps. 27,760 million in 2012 to Ps. 26,525 million in 2013. Prices for petrochemicals sold domestically decreased for a majority of our petrochemical products. In 2013, the volume of petrochemical exports increased by 0.5%, from 602.1 thousand tons in 2012 to 605.4 thousand tons in 2013. Losses related to petrochemical activities increased by 32.5%, from Ps. 11,270 million in 2012 to Ps. 14,936 million in 2013, mainly due to a 35.5% increase in the cost of sales in 2013, an increase in the prices of raw materials and an increase in the volume of raw materials used in connection with the reopening of the aromatics plant at the Cangrejera petrochemical complex and higher prices of raw materials.

Trading Companies

In 2013, trade sales relating to the PMI Group’s exports of crude oil and petroleum products to third parties (including services income) decreased in peso terms, from Ps. 773,426 million in 2012 to Ps. 688,464 million in 2013, as a result of a decrease in the volume and prices of crude oil exports. In 2013, net income related to the PMI Group decreased by 58.2% from Ps. 7,108 million in 2012 to Ps. 2,973 million in 2013, primarily due to an increase in its income tax and lower sales.

Corporate and Other Subsidiary Companies

In 2013, the trade sales relating to corporate and other subsidiary companies after inter-company eliminations decreased from Ps. 1,916,374 million in 2012 to Ps. 1,817,921 million in 2013, primarily due to higher revenues from services. Net income related to corporate and other subsidiary companies after inter-company eliminations decreased from Ps. 13,265 million in 2012 to Ps. 3,094 million in 2013, due to the unfavorable results of the subsidiary companies as well as a loss on foreign exchange, net.

2012 Compared to 2011

Exploration and Production

In 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s sales of crude oil to the PMI Group increased by 35.9%0.6% in peso terms and decreased by 37.9%4.8% in U.S. dollar terms, each as compared to 2010,2011, mainly due to an increase in the average sales prices of our principal petroleum products. The weighted average price of crude oil sold byPemex-Exploration and Production to the PMI Group for export was U.S. $101.09$101.86 in 2011,2012, as compared to U.S. $72.32$101.09 in 2010.2011. Total intersegment sales, which include sales to Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and the PMI Group, increased by 29.6%4.9%, principally as a result of the increase in crude oil export prices. Net income related to exploration and production activities increased by 71.6%226.2%, or Ps. 24,62265,169 million, from Ps. 34,36728,813 million in 20102011 to Ps. 58,98993,982 million in 2011,2012, primarily as a result of an increase in the average price of crude oil.

Refining

In 2011,2012, trade sales related to refining activities (including services income) increased by 16.4%16.0%, from Ps. 537,192 million in 2010 to Ps. 625,297 million in 2011 to Ps. 725,235 million in 2012, due to an increase in the average sales prices of petroleum products. Intersegment sales increaseddecreased by Ps. 6,29013,675 million, or 9.1%18.2%, from Ps. 68,865 million in 2010 to Ps. 75,155 million in 2011 to Ps. 61,480 million in 2012, mainly due to higher prices fora decrease in the volume of petroleum products.products sales. In 2011,2012, our total loss related to refining activities was Ps. 139,491102,098 million, 68.6% greater22.6% less than the loss of Ps. 82,712131,873 million in 2010.2011. The increasedecrease in loss was primarily due to higher international pricestrade sales and a gain on our foreign exchange, net, during 2011, which increased our cost of sales as a result of an increase in the value of purchases and inventories.2012. For the full year, refining margins were negative.

Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

In 2011,2012, trade sales related to the natural gas and basic petrochemical business segment increased(including services income) decreased by 3.5%7.9%, from Ps. 125,392129,773 million in 20102011 to Ps. 129,748119,490 million in 2011.2012. LPG sales increased by 8.6%11.1%, from Ps. 53,386 million in 2010 to Ps. 57,983 million in 2011 to Ps. 64,424 million in 2012, principally due to an increase in LPG prices. Natural gas sales decreased by 6.2%22.2%, from Ps. 68,73265,848 million in 20102011 to Ps. 64,46851,250 million in 2011,2012, mainly due to a decrease in natural gas prices. IncomeNet income related to natural gas and basic petrochemicals decreasedincreased by 140.6%148.2%, or Ps. 5,3034,960 million, from a profit of Ps. 3,772 million in 2010 to a loss of Ps. 1,5313,347 million in 2011 to a gain of Ps. 1,613 million in 2012, mainly due to decreased natural gas prices.

a decrease in costs and expenses and an increase in the income of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ subsidiaries.

Petrochemicals

In 2011,2012, trade sales related to the petrochemicals business segment increaseddecreased by 16.6%3.8%, from Ps. 24,739 million in 2010 to Ps. 28,855 million in 2011.2011 to Ps. 27,760 million in 2012. Prices for petrochemicals sold domestically increaseddecreased for a majority of our petrochemical products. In 2011,2012, the volume of petrochemical exports decreasedincreased by 39.1%40.2%, from 704.6 thousand tons in 2010 to 429.4 thousand tons in 2011.2011 to 602.1 thousand tons in 2012. Losses related to petrochemical activities decreasedincreased by 13.8%80.1%, from Ps. 14,753 million in 2010 to Ps. 12,7206,256 million in 2011 to Ps. 11,270 million in 2012, mainly due to lower sales of aromatics due to the temporary suspension of operations in the aromatics plants, a decrease in other revenues and increased sales.labor costs.

Corporate and SubsidiaryTrading Companies

In 2011,2012, trade sales relating to PMI’sthe PMI Group’s exports of crude oil and petroleum products to third parties (including services income) and the trading activities of the PMI Group increased by 30.2%decreased slightly in peso terms, from Ps. 594,742 million in 2010 to Ps. 774,529773,908 million in 2011 to Ps. 773,426 million in 2012, as a result of higher prices of the crude oil that we exported and a decrease in the volume of crude oil exports. In 2012, net income related to the PMI Group increased from Ps. 3,821 million in 2011 netto Ps. 7,108 million in 2012, primarily due to a decrease in its income tax.

Corporate and Other Subsidiary Companies

In 2012, the trade sales relating to corporate and other subsidiary companies after inter-company eliminations increased from Ps. 1,861,454 million in 2011 to Ps. 1,916,374 million in 2012, primarily due to higher revenues from services. Net income related to corporate and other subsidiary companies after inter-company eliminations which includes the international trading activities of the PMI Group, decreasedincreased from Ps. 12,800 million in 2010 to Ps. 3,2701,900 million in 2011 primarilyto Ps. 13,265 million in 2012, due to increased foreign exchange losses and financial costs relating to derivative financial instruments.

2010 Compared to 2009

Exploration and Production

In 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s sales of crude oil to the PMI Group increased by 30.9% in peso terms and by 39.4% in U.S. dollar terms, each as compared to 2009, mainly due to an increase in the average sales prices and volumes of our principal petroleum products. The weighted average price of crude oil sold by Pemex-Exploration and Production to the PMI Group for export was U.S. $72.32 in 2010, as compared to U.S. $57.44 in 2009. Total intersegment sales, which include sales to Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and the PMI Group, increased by 18.5%, principally as a resultfavorable performance of the increase in crude oil export prices. Net income related to exploration and production activities increased by 532.2%, or Ps. 28,931 million, from Ps. 5,436 million in 2009 to Ps. 34,367 million in 2010, primarily as a result of the increase in the average price of crude oil.

Refining

In 2010, trade sales related to refining activities increased by 14.4%, from Ps. 469,614 million in 2009 to Ps. 537,192 million in 2010, due to an increase in the average sales prices of petroleum products. Intersegment sales increased by Ps. 7,864 million, or 12.9%, from Ps. 61,001 million in 2009 to Ps. 68,865 million in 2010, mainly due to higher prices for petroleum products. In 2010, our total loss related to refining activities was Ps. 82,713 million, 10.4% less than the loss of Ps. 92,340 million in 2009. The decrease in loss was primarily due to higher international prices during the fourth quarter of 2010. For the full year, however, refining margins were negative, mainly due to an increase in cost of sales as a result of an increase in the value of purchases and inventories.

Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

In 2010, trade sales related to the natural gas and basic petrochemical business segment increased by 12.7%, from Ps. 111,245 million in 2009 to Ps. 125,392 million in 2010. LPG sales increased by 7.9%, from Ps. 49,461 million in 2009 to Ps. 53,386 million in 2010, principally due to an increase in LPG prices. Natural gas sales increased by 14.7%, from Ps. 59,916 million in 2009 to Ps. 68,732 million in 2010, mainly due to an increase in natural gas prices. Income related to natural gas and basic petrochemicals increased by 434.4%, or Ps. 4,900 million, from a loss of Ps. 1,128 million in 2009 to a profit of Ps. 3,772 million in 2010, mainly due to increased natural gas prices.

Petrochemicals

In 2010, trade sales related to the petrochemicals business segment increased by 31.0%, from Ps. 18,885 million in 2009 to Ps. 24,739 million in 2010. Prices for petrochemicals sold domestically increased for a majority of our petrochemical products. In 2010, the volume of petrochemical exports decreased by 7.3%, from 760.3 thousand tons in 2009 to 704.6 thousand tons in 2010. Losses related to petrochemical activities decreased by 25.8%, from Ps. 19,883 million in 2009 to Ps. 14,753 million in 2010, mainly due to increased sales.

Corporate and Subsidiary Companies

In 2010, trade sales relating to PMI’s exports of crude oil and petroleum products to third parties (including services income) and the trading activities of the PMI Group increased by 21.3% in peso terms, from Ps. 490,176 million in 2009 to Ps. 594,742 million in 2010, as a result of higher prices of the crude oil that we exported and an increase in the volume of crude oil exports. In 2010, net income related to corporate and subsidiary companies after inter-company eliminations, which includes the international trading activities of the PMI Group, decreased from Ps. 13,545 million in 2009 to Ps. 12,799 million in 2010, primarily due to increased costs associated with the reserve for employee benefits, interest expense on debt and financial costs relating to derivative financial instruments.

U.S. GAAP Reconciliation

Net income (loss) under U.S. GAAP differs from net income (loss) under Mexican FRS due to several factors, which include differences in methods of accounting for exploration and drilling costs, pension, seniority premiums and post-retirement benefit obligations, accrued vacation, capitalized interest, impairment of fixed assets, depreciation, derivatives, profit in inventory, deferred taxes, reclassification of Pemex Finance, Ltd. net income to non-controlling interest and our investment in Repsol shares. The amounts of these adjustments vary each year. For further information regarding these and other differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to our results, see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Income (Loss) and Equity (Deficit) under U.S. GAAP

For the year ended December 31, 2011, our loss under U.S. GAAP was approximately Ps. 109.9 billion, representing a Ps. 18.5 billion increase from the net loss recorded under Mexican FRS. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our net loss under U.S. GAAP was approximately Ps. 16.5 billion, representing a Ps. 30.0 billion decrease from the net loss recorded under Mexican FRS. For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net loss under U.S. GAAP was approximately Ps. 52.3 billion, representing a Ps. 42.1 billion decrease from the net loss recorded under Mexican FRS. For further detail regarding the adjustments related to these amounts, see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Our equity deficit under U.S. GAAP was approximately Ps. 326.2 billion at December 31, 2011, as compared to an equity deficit of Ps. 227.9 billion at December 31, 2010. For further detail regarding the adjustments related to these amounts, see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Accounting basis for the preparation of financial information

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS as promulgated by theConsejo Mexicano para la Investigación y Desarollo de Normas de Información Financiera, A.C. (Mexican Financial Reporting Standards Board, or CINIF).

Certain line items from the financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 have been reclassified in order to make the presentation of such financial statements comparable to that of the financial statements as of December 31, 2011.

Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

In January 2009, the CNBV adjusted its regulations in order to require Mexican issuers that disclose information through the BMV, including PEMEX, to adopt IFRS beginning in 2012. See Note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

In response to these requirements, we are currently in the process of finalizing our initial statement of financial position as of January 1, 2011 (the “transition date”) and our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “comparative year of adoption”) under IFRS, relying for this purpose on the IFRS effective as of those dates.

In order to determine our initial statement of financial position and comparative adoption statement of financial position based on IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” (“IFRS 1”), we will adjust the amounts previously reported in our financial statements prepared under Mexican FRS. The main effects and changes to accounting policies resulting from the adoption of IFRS are the following:

Optional Exceptions Under IFRS

Exception to use fair value as deemed cost.

IFRS 1 provides the option to measure property, plant and equipment, as well as certain intangibles, at their fair value as of the date of transition to IFRS and to use that fair value as the deemed cost of the relevant assets, or to use the updated book value previously reported under Mexican FRS, and, in the case of wells, the successful efforts method of accounting,provided that such book value is broadly comparable to (a) fair value or (b) cost or depreciated cost under IFRS, adjusted to recognize changes in inflation.

We have chosen to value our plants, pipelines, offshore platforms and drilling equipment at fair value as of the transition date, and, in addition, to subject these fixed assets to impairment tests. For the remaining fixed assets, we have chosen to use their current values under Mexican FRS or the successful efforts method of accounting in the case of wells, as their deemed cost. The net effect of the change in valuation of assets is recognized against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS as of the transition date.

Exception for borrowing costs.

IFRS 1 allows entities to apply the transitional guidelines included in revised IAS 23 “Borrowing Costs” (2007), which provides that the standard is effective as of January 1, 2009 or the transition date to IFRS, whichever is later, unless the entity elects retrospective application.

We chose to apply this exception and begin to capitalize prospectively all non-capitalized financing costs of assets which were not recognized at fair value.

Exception for accumulated currency translation effects

IFRS 1 permits the cancellation of the accumulated gains and losses from the translation of foreign currency amounts in the consolidation of the financial statements related to foreign operations and investments accounted for by the equity method under Mexican FRS. This exception allows entities to avoid calculating the accumulated foreign currency translation effect in accordance with IAS 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates,” as of the date on which the subsidiary or investment accounted for by the equity method was created or acquired. Instead, we have chosen to cancel the accumulated gains and losses from foreign currency translation effect against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS as of the transition date.

Mandatory exceptions under IFRS 1

Exception for accounting estimates

Assumptions used to quantify estimates prepared under IFRS as of the transition date should coincide with those previously made under the entity’s previous accounting principles, unless there is objective evidence that the previous estimates contained factual errors. We have reviewed our assumptions used to quantify estimates under Mexican FRS as of the transition date and have made no changes to assumptions previously used.

Other policy changes

Early adoption of IAS 19 (revised) “Employee Benefits” (“IAS 19”)

We chose the early adoption of IAS 19, which eliminates the use of the “corridor method” to recognize actuarial gains and losses. As a result, such items are now recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) in the period in which they are incurred. Items that may be recognized in the statement of operations are limited to past and present service costs, gains or losses arising from plan curtailments or settlements and interest income or expense. All other gains or losses in (liabilities) assets of termination or retirement benefits are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), with no further impact on the results of operations (see Note 3(t)).

As a result, we have recognized all unamortized actuarial gains or losses and plan modifications reported under Mexican FRS against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS.

Additionally, accruals for termination benefits are only recognized under IAS 19 when an entity has incurred a legal obligation to pay such benefits to the employee. For this reason, as of the transition date, we have cancelled the component of termination benefits against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS.

Identification by part

IAS 16, “Property, Plant and Equipment,” (“IAS 16”) requires the identification on a separate basis of parts of an asset that have different expected patterns of future economic benefits, with depreciation calculated separately by part. As of the transition date, we identified assets by part and depreciated accordingly.

Recognition of inflationary effects

In accordance with IAS 29, “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies,” (“IAS 29”), the threshold for considering an economy hyperinflationary, and consequently, adjusting certain line items in the financial statements for inflation, is reached when the cumulative three-year inflation rate is 100% or more. Under Mexican FRS, this threshold is reached when cumulative three-year inflation is 26% or more.

Principal Effects of Adoption

The table below shows the principal effects of our adoption of IFRSgain on our financial statements. The figures presented below under IFRS represent our best estimates and are subject to adjustment pending the result of the ongoing revision and auditing of the IFRS financial statements. For an explanation of the effects of adoption on our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011, see Note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.foreign exchange, net.

 

   As of December 31, 2011
(in billions of pesos)
 

Consolidated Statement of

Financial Position

  Mexican FRS  Adjustments
(Unaudited)
   IFRS
(Unaudited)
 

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment—Net

   Ps.  1,152.5    Ps.  473.8     Ps.  1,626.3  

Reserve for employee benefits

   731.0    112.4     843.5  

Total equity

   (193.9  340.8     146.9  

Item 6.Directors, Senior Management and Employees

Under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, Petróleos Mexicanos is governed by a 15 member Board of Directors composed as follows:

 

The President of Mexico appoints six members, who are Mexican Government representatives. These include the Chairperson, who is the Secretary of Energy.

 

  

TheSindicato de Trabajadores Petroleros de la República Mexicana(Petroleum (Petroleum Workers’ Union) selects five directors from among the employees of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities.

 

Four professional members, who are Mexican Government representatives, are appointed by the President of Mexico, subject to ratification by the Senate.

Except in the case of the professional members, who cannot designate alternates, alternate directors are authorized to serve on the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos in place of those who are unable to attend meetings or otherwise participate in the activities of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos. Budgetary actions can only be approved by the directors who are Mexican Government representatives.

In addition, except in the case of the professional members first appointed under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, the four professional members will be appointed to six year terms, and may be appointed for an additional term of the same length. Non-professional members of the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are not appointed for a specific term.

In February 2009, President Calderón nominated the individuals named below were appointed to serve as professional members to the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; their appointments were ratified by the Senate on March 17, 2009.Mexicanos. The professional members have served or will serve initial terms as set forth below.

 

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón, for three years;

 

Mr. Rogelio Gasca Neri, for four years;

 

Mr. Héctor Moreira Rodríguez, for five years; and

 

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez, for six years.

Following the expiration of Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcónn’s initial term as a professional director in March 2012, Mr. Ruíz Alarcón was reappointedappointed to an additional six-year term.Effective March 28, 2011,term. On April 12, 2013, the President of Mexico appointed Mr. Iván Aleksei Alemán Loza, Head of the Legal Affairs Unit of the Ministry of Energy, was appointedJorge José Borja Navarrete to serve as Secretarya professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos. EffectiveMexicanos, following the expiration of Mr. Rogelio Gasca Neri’s term. Mr. Jorge José Borja Navarrete’s appointment was ratified by the Senate on April 1, 2011, Ms. Neus Peniche Sala, Technical Secretary18, 2013. Following the expiration of the Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos,Mr. Héctor Moreira Rodríguez’s initial term as a professional director, he was appointed as Alternate Secretary ofon May 7, 2014 to an additional six-year term and his appointment was ratified by the Board of Directors.Senate on May 13, 2014.

As was the case prior to the issuance of the Subsidiary Entities Decree, eachEach of the boards of directors of the subsidiary entities is to be composed of:

 

the Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos, who will be the Chairperson;

 

Mexican Government representatives appointed by the President of Mexico; and

 

at least two professional members appointed by the President of Mexico, who will be Mexican Government representatives.

The Subsidiary Entities Decree established that professionalProfessional members of the boards of directors of the subsidiary entities will beare appointed to six year terms and may be appointed for an additional term on the same length. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development” for more details regarding this decree.

TheEstatuto Orgánico de(Organic Statute) of Petróleos Mexicanos,( was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation on September 24, 2009 and has since been modified on August 9, 2010, August 2, 2011, February 23, 2012, March 27, 2013, September 30, 2013, February 4, 2014 and February 7, 2014. On March 28, 2013, the Organic Statute of Petróleos Mexicanos) establisheseach of the subsidiary entities was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. These Organic Statutes establish the structure, organizational basis and functions of the administrative units of Petróleos Mexicanos and of each of the subsidiary entities, and also delineatesdelineate the duties and internal regulations of thetheir respective Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.Directors.

On December 18, 2009 and January 25, 2010,17, 2014, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos authorized several actions relating to the reorganization of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities. These include:

the elimination of the Corporate Engineering and Project Development Office, the activities of which are now carried out by the Corporate Operations Office of Petróleos Mexicanos and by the subsidiary entities;

the creation of the Corporate Information Technology and Business Processes Office of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

the assignment of the finance and management activities previously carried out by the subsidiary entities to the Corporate Finance Office of Petróleos Mexicanos, which is in the process of being implemented.

In September 2011, we completed the internal restructuring of Pemex-Exploration and Production. Among the more notable changes resulting from this restructuring are: (i) the integration of all exploration activities under the newly created Deputy Director’s Office of Exploration; (ii) the creation of the Deputy Director’s Office of Field Development to manage the Ayatsil-Tekel, Tsimin-Xux and Lakach projects; (iii) the integration of maintenance activities and infrastructure logistics for all regions under a single department; and (iv)approved the creation of a new drilling business unitdivision within the organizational structure of Petróleos Mexicanos—theDirección Corporativa de Procura y Abastecimiento (Corporate Office of Procurement and Supply)—and appointed Mr. Arturo Henríquez Autrey as director of this department. This division was established to centralize purchases related to goods, services and operating and public works leases.

On March 14, 2014, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos approved the creation of a research new division within the organizational structure of Petróleos Mexicanos—the Deputy Direction of Strategic Safeguarding—and development department.appointed Mr. Eduardo León Trauwitz as deputy director of this area. This area was established to strengthen our security policies and protect our products and facilities and remains part of theDirección Corporativa de Administración (Corporate Office of Management of Petróleos Mexicanos. For more information, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—PEMEX Corporate Matters—Security Strategy.”

The following tables set forth certain information with respect to directors and executive officers of Petróleos Mexicanos and each of the subsidiary entities as of April 11, 2012.4, 2014.

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. Jordy HernáPedro Joaquín Herrera FloresColdwell

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Secretary of Energy

Born: 19721950

Business experience: Director General of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; Undersecretary of Energy Planning and Technological DevelopmentChairman of the Ministry of Energy; and Director GeneralNational Executive Committee of the Investments Promotion UnitPRI; Senator of the MinistryLXth and LXIst Legislatures; and Chairman of Energy.the National Executive Commission of Internal Procedures of the PRI.

Other board memberships: Chairman of the Federal Electricity Commission; Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C.;, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Nacional Financiera, S.N.C.; and, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Comisión Nacional de Vivienda.Vivienda; Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático; Servicio Cozumel, S.A. de C.V.; Gasolinera y Servicios Juárez, S.A. de C.V.; Planta de Combustible Cozumel, S.A. de C.V.; Combustibles Caleta, S.A. de C.V.; Combustibles San Miguel, S.A. de C.V.; and Combustibles Tatich, S.A. de C.V.

   20112012  

Mr. Gerardo Ruiz MateosIldefonso Guajardo Villarreal

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and HeadSecretary of the President’s OfficeEconomy

Born: 19651957

Business experience: SecretaryFederal Deputy of Economy;the LXIst Legislature; Local Deputy of Nuevo León; and Chief of the President’s Office; and Chief Officer of Cabinets and Special ProjectsExecutive Office of the President’s Office.Governor of Nuevo León.

Other board memberships: Aeropuertos y Servicios Auxiliares; Banco del Ahorro Nacional y Servicios Financieros, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Caminos y Puentes Federales de Ingresos y Servicios Conexos; Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, A.C.; Centro Nacional de Metrología; Comisión Coordinadora para la Negociación de Precios de Medicamentos y otros Insumos para la Salud; Federal Electricity Commission; Comisión Federal de Mejora Regulatoria; Comisión Intersecretarial de Bioseguridad de los Organismos Genéticamente Modificados; Inter-Ministry Climate Change Commission; Comisión Intersecretarial de Compras y Obras de la Administración Pública Federal a la

   20072013

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed
Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa; Comisión Intersecretarial de Desarrollo Social; Comisión Intersecretarial de Gasto Público Financiamiento y Desincorporación; Comisión
Intersecretarial de Política Industrial; Comisión Intersecretarial de Precios y Tarifas de los Bienes y Servicios de la Administración Pública Federal; Comisión Intersecretarial de Vivienda; Comisión Intersecretarial de Asuntos de la Frontera Norte; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo de los Bioenergéticos; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo del Gobierno Electrónico; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo Rural Sustentable; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Manejo Sustentable de Mares y Costas; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Coordinación Operativa en los Puntos de Internación al Territorio Nacional; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Prevención y Combate a la Economía Ilegal; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Transición Digital; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Ventanilla Digital Mexicana de Comercio Exterior; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Trasparencia y el Combate a la Corrupción en la Administración Pública Federal; Comisión Nacional de Inversiones Extranjeras; Comisión Nacional de Vivienda; Comisión Nacional del Agua; Comisión Nacional Forestal; Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas; Comité de Control y Desempeño Institucional; Comité Intersectorial para la Innovación; Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Caña de Azúcar; Comité Técnico Intersecretarial de Innovación; Consejo Consultivo de Turismo; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Sector Turístico; Consejo Nacional de Normalización y Certificación de Competencias Laborales; Consejo Mexicano para el Desarrollo Rural Sustentable; Consejo Nacional contra las Adicciones; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Consejo General de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo Tecnológico e Innovación; Consejo Nacional de Fomento Educativo; Consejo Nacional de Infraestructura; Consejo Nacional de Protección Civil; Consejo de Salubridad General; Consejo Nacional de Vivienda; Consejo Nacional para la Competitividad de la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa; Consejo

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed
 
Nacional para la Prevención y Control de las Enfermedades Crónicas no Transmisibles; Consejo Nacional para las Comunidades Mexicanas en el Exterior; El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, A.C.; Chairman of Fideicomiso de Fomento Minero; Fideicomiso del Fondo de Cobertura Social de Telecomunicaciones; Fideicomiso Fondo Institucional para el Fomento de la Ciencia, el Fomento de la Tecnología y el Fomento, Desarrollo
y Consolidación de Científicos y Tecnólogos; Fideicomiso e-México; Fideicomiso México Emprende; Instituto del Fondo Nacional de Vivienda de los Trabajadores; Instituto del Fondo Nacional para el Consumo de los Trabajadores; Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud; Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial; Instituto Nacional de la Infraestructura Física Educativa; Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres; Nacional Financiera, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Chairman of ProMéxico; Chairman of Servicio Geológico Mexicano; Servicio Nacional de Capacitación y Asistencia Técnica Rural; Servicio Postal Mexicano; Sistema de Investigación Alfonso Reyes; Sistema de Investigación Benito Juárez; Sistema de Investigación Francisco Villa; Sistema de Investigación Golfo de México; Sistema de Investigación Ignacio Zaragoza; Sistema de Investigación José María Morelos; Sistema de Investigación Justo Sierra; Sistema de Investigación Mar de Cortés; Sistema de Investigación Miguel Hidalgo; and Telecomunicaciones de México.

Mr. Mario Gabriel BudeboMs. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Undersecretary of Hydrocarbons of the Ministry of Energy

Born: 19631962

Business experience: PresidentUndersecretary of Electricity; Director of Sustainability and Business of the Comisión Nacional del SistemaInstituto Tecnológico y de Ahorro para el Retiro; Chief of StaffEstudios Superiores de Monterrey; and Independent Consultant on energy matters.

Other board memberships: Chairwoman of the Secretary of Finance and Public Credit; and Director General of Revenues Policy of the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit.Comité Nacional de Normalización en Hidrocarburos.

   20102014  

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. José Antonio Meade

KuribreñaLuis Videgaray Caso

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Secretary of Finance and Public Credit

Born: 19691968

Business experience: Federal Deputy of the LXIst Legislature; President of the PRI in the Estado de México; and Secretary of Energy; Undersecretary of Finance and Public Credit of the SHCP; and Undersecretary of Income of the SHCP.Estado de México.

Other board memberships: Aeropuertos y Servicios Auxiliares; Caminos y Puentes Federales de Ingresos y Servicios Conexos; Federal Electricity Commission; Chairman of Financiera Nacional de Desarrollo Agropecuario, Rural, Forestal y Pesquero; Fondo de Cultura Económica; Instituto del Fondo Nacional de la Vivienda para los Trabajadores; Chairman of Instituto para la Protección al Ahorro

2013
Bancario; Chairman of Lotería Nacional para la Asistencia Pública; Pronósticos para la Asistencia Pública; Servicio Postal Mexicano; Telecomunicaciones de México; Chairman of Agroasemex, S.A., Institución Nacional de Seguros; Chairman of Banco del Ahorro Nacional y Servicios Financieros, S.N.C.;, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Chairman of Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C.;, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Chairman of Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C.; CNBV; Comisió, Institución Nacional de Seguros y Fianzas; Chairman of Comisión Nacional del SistemaBanca de Ahorro para el Retiro;Desarrollo; Chairman of Banco Nacional del Ejército, Fuerza Aérea y Armada, S.N.C.;, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Chairman of Nacional Financiera, S.N.C.; Chairman of Sociedad Hipotecaria Federal, S.N.C.;, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Chairman of Seguros de Crédito a la Vivienda SHF, S.A. de C.V.; Aeropuertos y Servicios Auxiliares; Caminos y Puentes Federales de Ingresos y Servicios Conexos; Chairman of CasaSociedad Hipotecaria Federal, S.N.C., Institución de MonedaBanca de México; Federal Electricity Commission;Desarrollo; Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores; Comisión Nacional de Vivienda; Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas;Seguros y Fianzas; Chairman of Comisión Nacional para la Protección y Defensa de los Usuarios de Servicios Financieros; Chairman of Financiera Rural; Colegio de Postgraduados; Consejo Nacional de Fomento Educativo;Cambios; Comisión Nacional Forestal; Fondo de Cultura Económica; InstitutoInversiones Extranjeras; Banco Interamericano de SeguridadDesarrollo y Servicios SocialesCorporación Interamericana de los Trabajadores del Estado; Instituto del Fondo Nacional para el ConsumoInversiones; Banco Internacional de los Trabajadores; Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud; Instituto Mexicano de la Radio; Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Penales; Instituto Nacional para la Educación de los Adultos; Servicio Postal Mexicano; Telecomunicaciones de México; Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres; Instituto Nacional de las Personas Adultas Mayores; Chairman of Instituto para la Protección al Ahorro Bancario; Chairman of Lotería Nacional para la Asistencia Pública; Chairman of Servicio de AdministracióReconstrucción y Enajenación de Bienes; Chairman of Servicio de Administración Tributaria; Comisión Nacional del Agua; Fideicomiso de los Sistemas Normalizado de Competencia Laboral y de Certificación de Competencia Laboral; ChairmanFomento of the FondoWorld Bank; Organismo Multilateral de Operación y Financiamiento Bancario Garantía la Vivienda; Coordinación Nacional del Programade Inversiones of the World Bank; and Banco de Desarrollo Humano Oportunidades; Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor; Comisión de Política Gubernamental en Materia de Derechos Humanos; Comisión Intersecretarial de

Caribe.
  

2011

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed
Cambio Climático; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo del Gobierno Electrónico; Chairman of Comisión Intersecretarial de Gasto Público, Financiamiento y Desincorporación; Comisión Intersecretarial de la Coordinación Operativa en los Puntos de Internación en Territorio Nacional; Comisión Intersecretarial de Política Industrial; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Instrumentación del Registro Nacional de Poblacion; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Prevención y Combate a la Economía Ilegal; Comisión para la Transparencia y el Combate a la Corrupción en la Administración Pública Federal; Consejo Nacional de Educación para la Vida y Trabajo; Chairman of Consejo Nacional de Armonización Contable; Chairman of the Consejo de Estabilidad del Sistema Financiero; Comisión Nacional de Inversiones Extranjeras; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Transición Digital; Chairman of Pronósticos para la Asistencia Pública; Comisión Intersecretarial de Bioseguridad y Organismos Genéticamente Modificados; Consejo Nacional para la Prevención y Control de las Enfermedades Crónicas No Transmisibles; Comisión Intersecretarial de Desarrollo Social; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Otorgamiento de Concesiones y Permisos Previstos en la Ley de Aeropuertos; Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo Rural Sustentable; Chairman of the Comisión de Cambios; Consejo Nacional para las Personas con Discapacidad; Consejo Nacional para el Desarrollo y la Inclusión de las Personas con Discapacidad; Comisión Permanente de Servicios de Salud a la Comunidad; Consejo de Salubridad General; Consejo General de Investigación Científica y Desarrollo Tecnológico e Innovación; Consejo Nacional de Protección Social en Salud; Consejo Nacional para la Competitividad de la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa; Consejo Nacional para las Comunidades Mexicanas en el Exterior; Comisión Coordinadora para la Negociación de Precios de Medicamentos y Otros Insumos para la Salud; Comisión Ambiental Metropolitana; Comisión Asesora de la Junta de Gobierno del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Comité Técnico Especializado en Información sobre Discapacidad; Comisión Intersecretarial de Compras y Obras de la Administración Pública Federal a la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa; Fideicomiso e-México; Consejo Nacional de Fomento Educativo; Procuraduría Social de Atención a las Víctimas de Delitos; Fondo de Cobertura Social de Telecomunicaciones; Governor for Mexico of the Inter-American Development Bank and Interamerican Investment Corporation; Governor for Mexico of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) and the International Development Association and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (World Bank); and Governor for Mexico of the Caribbean Development Bank.

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. José Antonio González

AnayaMiguel Messmacher Linartas

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Undersecretary of Income of the SHCP.SHCP

Born: 19671972

Business experience: Chief of StaffHead of the SecretaryEconomic Planning Unit of Finance and Public Credit; Chief of the Federative Entities Coordination UnitFinance of the SHCP; and ChiefEconomist of the Insurance, SecuritiesInternational Monetary Fund; and Pensions UnitEconomic Researcher of the SHCP.Banco de México.

Other board memberships: Federal Electricity Commission (Alternate); Lotería Nacional para la Asistencia Pública (Alternate); Pronósticos para la Asistencia Pública (Alternate); Servicio de Administración y Enajenación de Bienes (Alternate); Servicio de Administración Tributaria (Alternate); Comisión de Fomento de las Actividades de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil; Comisión Intersecretarial para la Coordinación Operativa en los Puntos de Internación en Territorio Nacional (Alternate); Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo de los Bioenergéticos (Alternate); Comisión Intersecretarial de la Industria Automotriz; Comisión de Cambios; Comisión de Comercio Exterior; Comisión Tripartita encargada de la Evaluación y Seguimiento de las

  

2011

2013

Disposiciones establecidas en la Ley de Ayuda Alimentaria para los Trabajadores; Comisión Tripartita a que se refiere el artículo 15 de la Ley de Ayuda Alimentaria para los Trabajadores; Comité Interinstitucional para la Aplicación del Estímulo Fiscal a Proyectos de Inversión en la Producción Teatral Nacional; Comité Nacional de Productividad (Alternate); Comité Interinstitucional para la Aplicación del Estímulo Fiscal a Proyectos de Inversión en la Producción Cinematográfica Nacional; and Consejo Nacional de Armonización Contable.

Mr. Rafael Morgan RíosFrancisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and SecretaryUndersecretary of Planning and Energy Transition of the SPF.Ministry of Energy

Born: 19351974

Business experience: UndersecretaryDirector General of ControlEnergy Information and Public Management AuditStudies of the SFP; Comptroller and DeputyMinistry of Energy; Director of Almacenes Zaragoza, S.A. de C.V.;International Negotiations of the Ministry of Energy; and Director of Despacho Contable y Administrativo.Consultant for the World Bank.

Other board memberships: ComisiónComité Intersecretarial de Gasto Público, Financiamiento y Desincorporación; Comisión Nacional para el DessarrolloDesarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas;Bioenergéticos (Alternate);

2013

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed
Sistema Nacional de Información Estadística y Geográfica; Chairman of theComité Técnico y de Administración del Fideicomiso Fondo Sectorial CONACYT-Secretaría de Energía-Sustentabilidad Energética; Chairman of Comité Técnico del Fondo para la Transición Energética y el Aprovechamiento Sustentable de la Energía; Consejo Consultivo para las Energías Renovables; and Consejo Consultivo para el Aprovechamiento Sustentable de Seguridad Nacional; and Comisión Intersecretarial de Desarrollo Social.

la Energía.
  2012

Mr. Fernando Pacheco Martínez

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Union Representative

Born: 1952

Business experience: General Secretary of Section 24 of the Union; Chairman of the Renewal Group of Section 24 of the Union; and Secretary of the Interior and Agreements of the Union.

  2007

Mr. Jorge Wade González

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Union Representative

Born: 1947

Business experience: Union commissioner of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  2007

Mr. Luis Ricardo Aldana PrietoFernando Navarrete Pérez

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Union Representative

Born: 19541955

Business experience: SenatorSecretary of the LIXth Legislature; ChairmanInterior, Records and Agreements of the General Supervision BoardUnion; Secretary of the General Executive CommitteeExterior and Publicity of the Union; and TreasuryPrivate Secretary of the General Executive CommitteeSecretary of the Union.

  20012013

Mr. Héctor Manuel Sosa

Rodríguez

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Union Representative

Born: 1964

Business experience: Secretary of the Interior and Agreements for the Local Executive Committee of Section 34 of the Union; General Secretary for the Local Executive Committee of Section 34 of the Union; and Officer in the Local Executive Committee of Section 34 of the Union.

2007

Mr. Pedro García BarabataSergio Lorenzo Quiroz Cruz

  

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Union Representative

Born: 19571959

Business experience: Federal Deputy of the LXIst Legislature; Secretary of the Interior and Agreements of the Union; and Local Deputy of the LXIst Legislature.

2013

Mr. José del Pilar Córdova Hernández

Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos and Union Representative

Born: 1959

Business experience: Federal Deputy of the LXIst Legislature; Local Deputy of the LIXth Legislature; and Union commissioner of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  20072013

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez

Enríquez

  

Professional Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos

Born: 1937

Business experience: Head of Governmental Audit Unit of the SFP; Head of the Internal Control Body

2009

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed
of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Regional Delegate of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social in Baja California and San Luis R.C. Sonora.

Vacant

  

Professional Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos

2009

Mr. Héctor Moreira RodríguezJorge José Borja Navarrete

  

Professional Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos

Born: 19461943

Business experience: Member of the Board of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Advisor of the ChancellorGrupo Xignux; and Corporate Director of the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey; Vice ChancellorEngineering and Project Development of Academic Development and ResearchPetróleos Mexicanos.

Other board memberships: Chairman of the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey; and Undersecretary of Hydrocarbons of the Ministry of Energy.Club Universidad Nacional, A.C.

   2009

Mr. Rogelio Gasca Neri

Professional Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos

Born: 1942

Business experience: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cintra, S.A.; Consul General of Mexico in Austin, Texas; and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Electricity Commission.

Other board memberships: CI Banco, S.A.

20092013  

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón

  

Professional Board Member of Petróleos Mexicanos

Born: 1967

Business experience: Advisor on Energy Policy of the Chamber of Deputies (LIXth and LXth Legislatures); Deputy ChiefCivil Protection Advisor to the Legislative Assembly of the Federal District; and Technical Instructor ofat the Instituto de Capacitación Ferrocarrilera; and Advisor of the Civil Protection Commission of the Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal.Ferrocarrilera.

   20092012  

Mr. Juan José Suárez CoppelEmilio Ricardo Lozoya Austin

  

Chief Executive Officer/Director General

Born: 19591974

Business experience: Chief Administrative and Financial OfficerManager of Grupo Modelo, S.A.B. de C.V.; Chief Financial Officer of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Chief of StaffInternational Affairs of the SecretaryCampaign Team and Transition Team of FinancePresident Enrique Peña Nieto; Founder and Public Credit.

Other board memberships: Federal Electricity Commission; Corporación Mexicana de Investigación en Materiales, S.A. de C.V.;Manager of various private equity funds; and Chairman of the Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo.Chief

   20092012  

Director for Latin America of the World Economic Forum.

Other board memberships: Chairman of Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo; Federal Electricity Commission; and Corporación Mexicana de Investigaciones en Materiales, S.A. de C.V.

Mr. Ignacio Quesada MoralesMario Alberto Beauregard Álvarez

  

Chief Financial Officer/Corporate Director of Finance

Born: 19661964

Business experience: ChiefFinancial Director of StaffOHL de México, S.A.B. de C.V.; Director of the SecretaryAdministration and Finance of FinanceHipotecaria Su Casita, S.A. de C.V.; and Public Credit; ChiefDirector of StaffPlanning, Analysis and Comptrolling Area of the Secretary of Social Development; and Partner of McKinsey & Company. Other board memberships: Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo (Alternate).Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo.

   20112013  

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

  Year
Appointed
 

Ms. Guadalupe Merino BañuelosMr. Mario Govea Soria

  

Deputy Director of Programming and Budgeting

Born: 1971

Business experience: Deputy Director General of Corporate ServicesManagement of Petróleos Mexicanos;Banco del Ahorro Nacional y Servicios Financieros, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Treasury Director of Nacional Financiera, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; and Deputy Director of Economic PlanningTreasury Strategies of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Associate Managing Director of Finance of Petróleos Mexicanos.Nacional Financiera, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo.

   20112013  

Mr. Mauricio Alazraki PfefferRodolfo Campos Villegas

  

Deputy Director of Treasury (formerly known as

Born: 1973

Business experience: Deputy Director of FinanceRisks and Treasury)

Born: 1965

Business experience: Associate ManagingFinancial Strategy of Fiduciary Funds of Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Director of Internal Credit of the SHCP; and Director of Finance of Petróleos Mexicanos; Deputy Manager of Capital Markets of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Manager of Corporate Finance for Latin America of West Merchant Bank, Ltd.Canadian Resorts.

   20062013  

Mr. Víctor M. Cámara Peón

  

Deputy Director of Accounting Fiscal and Financial ControlFiscal

Born: 1943

Business experience: Advisor of the Chief Financial Officer of Petróleos Mexicanos; Director of Control and Operational Risk of Banco Nacional de México, S.A.; and Director General of Human Resources of Banco Nacional de México, S.A.

Other board memberships: Intermarítima Maya, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Roche, S.A.; Comercial Salinera de Yucatán, S.A. de C.V.; Infraestructura Maya Peninsular, S.A. de C.V.; and Industria Salinera de Yucatán, S.A. de C.V.

   2003  

Mr. Alejandro Pérez GalindoMs. Alma Rosa Moreno Razo

  

Deputy Director of Economic Planning

Born: 19711952

Business experience: Chief of StaffAdvisor of the Chief Financial OfficerDirector General of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate ManagingPartner of ITG Consultores; and General Director of Marketing for Latin AmericaManagement of General Electric Energy Services; and Project Manager and Junior Partner of McKinsey & Company, Inc.Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V.

   20122013  

Mr. David Ruelas Rodríguez

  

Deputy Director of Risk Management

Born: 1977

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Corporate Financial Management of Petróleos Mexicanos; Coordinator of Governmental Programs and Strategic Consolidation of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Advisor to the Corporate Director of Management of Petróleos Mexicanos.

   2011  

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed

Mr. Víctor Díaz Solís

Corporate Director of Management

Born: 1960

Business experience: Head of Specialized Services for Projects of Petróleos Mexicanos; Coordinator of Technical Advisory of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Assistant Director General of Liaison and Control of the SHCP.

2013

Mr. Marco Antonio Murillo

Soberanis

  

Acting Corporate Director of Management and Deputy Director of Human Resources and Labor Relations

Born: 1959

Business experience: Acting Corporate Director of Management of Petróleos Mexicanos; Deputy Director of Human Resources of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Corporate Associate Managing Director of Human Resources of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  2005

Mr. Antonio Eduardo Carrillo Liceaga

Deputy Director of Corporate Services

2005Born: 1965

Business experience: Executive Coordinator of Corporate Direction of Management of Petróleos Mexicanos; Advisor of the Corporate Direction of Operations of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Associate Managing Director of Public Work Agreements Standardization of Petróleos Mexicanos.

2013

Mr. Rodolfo Rojas Rubí

Deputy Director of Health Services

Born: 1941

Business experience: Implant and Transplant Coordinator at the Instituto Carlos Slim de la Salud; Technical Secretary of the National Health Board of the Secretaría de Salud; and Chief of Staff of the Management Officer of the Secretaría de Salud. Other board memberships: Centro Médico Nacional of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; Colegio de Posgraduados of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; and Sociedad Mexicana de Calidad de la Atención a la Salud.

2013

Ms. Elena del Carmen Tanus Meouchi

Deputy Director of Equity Administration

Born: 1967

Business experience: Director of Attention of Supervision Stages and Joint Bodies of the Sistema de Administración y Enajenación de Bienes; Deputy Manager of Agreements of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Advisor of the Deputy Director of Equity Management of Petróleos Mexicanos.

2013

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

  Year
Appointed

Mr. Sergio Alberto Martín

Esquivel

Deputy Director of Corporate Services

Born: 1976

Business experience: Advisor to the Corporate Director of Management of Petróleos Mexicanos; Advisor to the Corporate Director of Finance of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Chief of Staff of the Fideicomiso para el Ahorro de Energía.

2011

Mr. Víctor M. Vázquez Zárate

Deputy Director of Health Services

Born: 1943

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Medical Services of Petróleos Mexicanos; Administrative Deputy Manager of Medical Services of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Director of Central South High Specialty Hospital of Petróleos Mexicanos.

2000 

Mr. Miguel Ángel Pérez

FernándezJosé Luis López Zamudio

  

Deputy Director of Equity Administration

Born: 1953

Business experience: Coordinator of Governmental Programs and Strategic Consolidation of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Corporate Financial Management of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Deputy Manager of Financial Resources of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Other board memberships: I.I.I. Servicios, S.A. de C.V. and Instalaciones Inmobiliarias para Industrias, S.A. de C.V.

2010

Ms. María Gabriela García

Velázquez

Coordinator of Governmental Programs and Strategic Consolidation

Born: 19741963

Business experience: Executive Coordinator of the Corporate Management Office of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Corporate Financial ManagementBudget of Petróleos Mexicanos;Pemex-Refining; and Associate Managing Director of Sectorial Programs, OperativeFinancial Assessment of Pemex-Gas and Organizational Support of the SHCP; Private Secretary to the Head Official of the Ministry of Economy.Basic Petrochemicals.

  

2011

2013

Mr. Carlos Rafael Murrieta

Cummings

  

Corporate Director of Operations

Born: 1965

Business experience: Consultant/Partner Director of McKinsey & Co.Company; Partner of McKinsey & Company; and Consultant of McKinsey & Company.

  

2009

Ms. Cybele Beatriz Díaz

Wionczek

Deputy Director of the Unit of Suppliers Development and National Content

Born: 1969

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Administration and Management of Suppliers and Catalogs of Petróleos Mexicanos; Chief of Staff of the Corporate Director of Operations of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Assistant Director General of Planning of the Secretaría de Desarrollo Social.

2010

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed

Mr. Ernesto Ríos Patrón

  

Deputy Director of Project Development

Born: 1968

Business experience: Acting Corporate Director of Engineering and Project Development of Petróleos Mexicanos; Corporate Director of Planning and Institutional Development of the Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo; and Project Operational Coordinator of the Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo.

Other board memberships: CIATEQ, A.C.; and P.M.I. Infraestructura de Desarrollo, S.A. de C.V.

   2010  

Mr. Carlos Salvador de Regules

Ruíz-Funes

  

Deputy Director of Strategy and Operative Planning

Born: 1969

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Strategic Planning of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Environmental Protection of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Advisor to the Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  

 

2011

  

Mr. Jorge Itzal Martínez Herrera

  

Deputy Director of Operation and Strategy Execution

Born: 1966

Business experience: Deputy Director of Strategy and Operative Planning of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Strategic Planning of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Associate Managing Director of Operations Analysis and Programming of Petróleos Mexicanos.

   2011  

Mr. Luis Fernando Betancourt

Sánchez

  

Deputy Director of Operative Discipline, Safety, Health and Environmental Protection

Born: 1967

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Operative Discipline and Execution of SSPA

2010

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed
System of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Environmental Protection of Pemex-Refining; and Associate Managing Director of Implementation of SSPA System of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  

2010

Mr. Ramón Guerrero Esquivel

Deputy Director of Supplies

Born: 1946

Business experience: President and Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Trade Systems, Inc.; Director of Supply Process Redesign Project in Petróleos Mexicanos; and President and Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Trade Systems, Inc.

2010

Mr. Eleazar Gómez Zapata

  

Deputy Director of Maintenance Coordination

Born: 1954

Business experience: Deputy Director of Pipeline Transportation System Coordination of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Tracking and Operative Coordination of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Associate Managing Director of Operative Opportunities Analysis of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Other board memberships: Corporación Mexicana de Investigaciones en Materiales, S.A. de C.V. (Alternate); and Mex Gas Cogeneración, S.L.U.

   2012  

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed

Mr. José Ignacio Aguilar Álvarez

Greaves

  

Deputy Director of Hydrocarbons and Derivatives Logistics (formerly known as Deputy Director of Pipeline Transportation System Coordination)

Born: 1970

Business experience: Executive Coordinator of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Capital Investment Analysis of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Deputy Manager of the Strategic PlanPlanning of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  

2012

Mr. Mauricio Abraham Galán

RamírezJosé Luis Luna Cárdenas

  

Chief Information Officer / Corporate Director of Information Technology and Business Processes

Born: 19701958

Business experience: Vice President of Business Process Transformation and Operations of Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V.; Senior Vice President of Innovation of Cemex, S.A.B. de C.V.; and Chief Information Officer of Grupo Comercial Chedraui,Cemex, S.A.B. de C.V.; Director of SAP Excellence Center of Grupo Modelo, S.A.B. de C.V.; and Associate Managing Director of Technology and Information Processes of Pemex-Refining.

  

2010

2013

Mr. Francisco José Acosta OrtízHugo Carlos Berlanga Flores

  

Deputy Director of Technological Infrastructure

Born: 19581960

Business experience: Acting DeputyDirector General of Information Technologies and Communications of the State of Tamaulipas; Executive Director of Information Technology of Pemex-ExplorationEnter S.A. de C.V.; and Production; Associate ManagingOperations Director of Administration and Management Systems of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Regional Deputy Manager of Regional Information Technology (Northeastern Marine Region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Other board memberships: Asociación de Ingenieros Petroleros de México.Enter Group.

   20102013  

Mr. Carlos Guillermo Mayorga

DelgadoCésar Andrés Conchello Brito

  

Deputy Director of Information Technology Planning and Business Intelligence

Born: 19591969

Business experience: Acting DeputyAdvisor of the Director of Business Processes and Technological InfrastructureGeneral of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Innovation and Technological Infrastructure of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Regional Deputy Manager of SupportBusiness Development and Alliances of Information Technology (North) of Pemex-Refining.Pemex-

2013

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

  

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

2010

Year
Appointed
Refining and Chief of the Economic Evaluation Area of Pemex-Refining.

Mr. José Miguel Chio SolísOmar Palomino Molina

  

Deputy Director of Solutions Integration and Business Processes

Born: 19621968

Business experience: Director of Energy Industry of Everis México; Associate Managing Director of the Competence CenterProcurement Process Improvement of Pemex-GasPetróleos Mexicanos; and Basic Petrochemicals; Associate Managing Director of Information TechnologyBusiness Development of Pemex-Petrochemicals; and Associate Managing Director of Systems of Industrias Negromex, S.A. de C.V.SAP México & Centroamérica.

   20102013  

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed

Mr. Marco Antonio de la Peña

Sánchez

  

Legal Director (formerly known as General Counsel)

Born: 1963

Business experience: Legal Director of Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C.;, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; Legal and Fiduciary Director of Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C.;, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo; and Deputy Legal Director General of Lotería Nacional para la Asistencia Pública.

  

2011

Mr. Fermín Fernández Guerra

Espinal

  

Deputy Legal Director of Processes and ProjectsProject Control

Born: 1976

Business experience: Executive Coordinator of the Office of the General Counsel of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Equity Regulations of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Deputy Manager of Consulting Services of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  

2012

Mr. Francisco Arturo García

Agraz Sánchez

  

Deputy Legal Director of Litigious Affairs

Born: 1961

Business experience: Head of the Internal Legal Control Body of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; Regulatory Comptroller Director of Banco Santander, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Santander; and Legal Deputy Director General of Estrategia Corporativa,Litigious Affairs of Banco Santander, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Santander.

  

 

2012

  

Ms. Silvia María Cristina

Oropeza Querejeta

  

Deputy Director of Legal Consultancy

Born: 1953

Business experience: Legal Associate Managing Director of Amendments and Agreements of Petróleos Mexicanos; Deputy Manager of Acquisitions, Leases and Services Agreements of

2012

Petróleos Mexicanos—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed
Petróleos Mexicanos; and Chief of the Amendments, Agreements and Joint Groups Consulting Unit of Petróleos Mexicanos.

  

2012

Mr. Gustavo Ernesto Ramírez

RodríguezArturo Henríquez Autrey

  

HeadCorporate Director of the Internal Control BodyProcurement and Supply

Born: 19561970

Business experience: Alternate Public CommissionerPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Pemex Procurement International, Inc.; Operative Partner, Founder and Director of PLA Ventures, LLC; and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Energy SectorBoard of the SFP; PartnerDirectors of Maxim Oil and Director General of Consultores and Asesores Independientes Ramírez y Asociados,Gas, Inc.

Other board memberships: Repsol, S.A.; Automotriz Trébol Ermita, S.A. de C.V. (Alternate); and Advisor to the Deputy Director of Management of the Consejo de Promoción Turística de México,Automotriz Trébol Texcoco, S.A. de C.V. (Alternate).

  

2008

2014

Mr. Diodoro José Siller ArgüelloDavid Rodríguez Martínez

  

HeadActing Deputy Director of Auditing Area for DevelopmentStrategic Management and Improvement of Public AdministrationBusiness Model Support

Born: 19681953

Business experience: Acting Deputy Director General of Legal AffairsSupplies of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Supplies Procedure Improvement of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Vice President of Customer Service of Integrated Trade Systems, Inc.

2014

Ms. Cybele Beatriz Díaz Wionczek

Acting Deputy Director of Development and Supplier and Contractor Liaisons

Born: 1969

Business experience: Deputy Director of the Secretaría del TrabajoUnit of Suppliers Development and National Content of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Administration and Management of Suppliers and Catalogs of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Chief of Staff of the Corporate Director of Operations of Petróleos Mexicanos.

2014

Vacant

Deputy Director of Procurement and Supply—  

Mr. Tomás Ibarra Guerra

Deputy Director of the Institutional Internal Control Unit Born: 1970

Business experience: Head of the Regional Auditing Unit (Northern Zone) of Pemex-Refining; Deputy Director of Surveillance and Procedures of Banco Nacional de Obras y PrevisióServicios Públicos S.N.C., Institución Social;de Banca de Desarrollo; and Head of the Internal Control Body of the SecretaríLotería del Trabajo y Previsión Social; and Managing Partner of Siller & Siller Abogados, S.C.Nacional para la Asistencia Pública.

Other board memberships: Kot Insurance Company A.G.; Pemex Procurement International, Inc.

   20122013  

Petróleos Mexicanos—Pemex-Exploration and Production—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Petróleos Mexicanos

Year
Appointed

Mr. Héctor Aguiñaga Pérez

Head of the Internal Auditing Area

Born: 1950

Business experience: National Director of Management Assurance Services of KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.; General Auditor of Pan-American Beverages, Inc.; and General Auditor of Sears Roebuck, S.A. de C.V.

2004

Mr. Jorge Mejía Alonzo

Head of the Liabilities Area and Head of the Complaints Area

Born: 1966

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Liabilities of Petróleos Mexicanos; Deputy Manager of Complaints and Citizen Attention of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Coordinator of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

2011

Pemex-Exploration and Production—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Pemex-Exploration and Production

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. Juan José Suárez CoppelEmilio Ricardo Lozoya Austin

  Chairman of the Board of Pemex-Exploration and Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   20092012  

Mr. Carlos Rafael Murrieta

Cummings

Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2010

Mr. Carlos Alberto Treviño

Medina

Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production and Undersecretary of Expenditures of the SHCP

Born: 1970

Business experience: Corporate Director of Management of Petróleos Mexicanos; Chief Financial Officer of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Director General of Programming and Budgeting “B” of the SHCP.

2010

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo

  Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2007

Mr. Carlos Montaño Fernández

Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production and Director General of Banco del Ahorro Nacional y Servicios Financieros, S.N.C.

Born: 1971

Business experience: Undersecretary of Disbursements of the SHCP; Head of the Investments Unit of the SHCP; and General Director of Energy Planning of the Ministry of Energy.

2011

Mr. Jaime González Aguadé

Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production and Undersecretary of Electricity of the Ministry of Energy.

Born: 1968

Business experience: Chief Executive Officer of Banco del Ahorro Nacional y Servicios Financieros, S.N.C.; Assistant Director General of Programs and Operation of Financiera Rural; and Assistant Director of Regional Banking of Banco Nacional de Crédito Rural, S.N.C.

Other board memberships: Federal Electricity Commission (Alternate); Comisión Nacional de Normalización; Comisión Nacional de Vivienda (Alternate); Centro Nacional de Metrología; Entidad Mexicana de Acreditación, A.C.; Nacional Financiera, S.N.C. (Alternate); Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C. (Alternate); and Comisión Nacional de las Zonas Áridas.

2012

Mr. Jaime E. Zabludowsky Kuper

Professional Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production

Born: 1956

Business experience: Vice President and Founder Partner of IQOM Inteligencia Comercial, S.A. de C.V.; Vice President of the Consejo Mexicanos de Asuntos Internacionales; and Ambassador of Mexico in the European Union and Chief Negotiator of the Free Trade Agreement between Mexico and the European Union.

Other board memberships: Consejo Mexicano de la Industria

2010

Pemex-Exploration and Production—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Pemex-Exploration and Production

Year
Appointed
de Productos de Consumo, A.C. (Executive Chairman); Inteligencia Comercial, S.A. de C.V.; Consejo Mexicano de Comercio Exterior, A.C.; Cala de Ulloa; and Información Digital Vértice, S.A. de C.V.

Mr. Héctor Moreira Rodríguez

Professional Member of the Board of Directors of Pemex-Exploration and Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   2010  

Mr. Carlos Arnoldo Morales GilFrancisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez

  

Director General

Born: 1954

Business experience: Deputy Director of Planning and EvaluationBoard Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Deputy Director (Southern region)Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2013

Mr. Miguel Messmacher Linartas

Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing Director of Planning of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Other board memberships: Chairman of Compañía Mexicana de Exploraciones, S.A. de C.V.; YPF, S.A.; and Instituto Mexicano del (refer to Petróleo.

leos Mexicanos)
   20062013  

Mr. Sergio Aceves BorbollaMario Alberto Beauregard Álvarez

  

Deputy Director of Project Services (formerly known as Deputy Director of Engineering and Strategic Works Development)

Born: 1959

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Projects (Northeastern Marine region)Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Associate Managing Director of Construction of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Head of Transition Projects of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)
   20052013

Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios

Board Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2014

Vacant

Professional Member of the Board of Directors of Pemex-Exploration and Production—  

Mr. Jorge José Borja Navarrete

Professional Member of Pemex-Exploration and Production (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2013  

Mr. Gustavo Hernández García

  

Acting Director General

Born: 1958

Business experience: Deputy Director of Planning and Evaluation

Born: 1958

Business experience: of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Deputy Director (Southwestern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing Director of Planning and Evaluation (Northeastern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Manager of Integral Ku-Maloob-Zaap Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

   20102014  

Mr. J. Javier Hinojosa PueblaJosé Refugio Serrano Lozano

  

Deputy Director of Fields Development (formerly known as Deputy Director of Drilling and Well Maintenance)Project Services

Born: 19581956

Business experience: Deputy Director of Production (Northeastern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Coordinator of the Executive Commercial Operative CoordinationDeputy Director (Southern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing DirectorManager of Analysis and Technical Operative Evaluationthe Integral Samaria-Luna Business Unit (Southern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

   20092013

Mr. Luis Ramos Martínez

Acting Deputy Director of Planning and Evaluation

Born: 1957

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Strategy and Portfolio Management of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Associate Managing Director of Strategic Planning of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate

2014  

Pemex-Exploration and Production—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Pemex-Exploration and Production

  Year
Appointed
 
Managing Director of Hydrocarbons Reserves of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Mr. Juan Arturo Hernández

CarreraMiguel Ángel Maciel Torres

  

Acting Deputy Director of Production, Northern Region (formerly known as DeputyFields Development

Born: 1960

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of the Northern region)

Born: 1961

Business experience:Lakach Development Project of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Manager of Integral Burgos Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Acting Associate Managing Director of Strategic Planning and Evaluation (Northern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing Director of Planning and Evaluation (Southwestern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

  2014

Mr. Ricardo Villegas Vázquez

Acting Deputy Director of Production, Southwestern Marine region

2009Born: 1963

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of the Tsimin-Xux Development Project of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Manager of the Integral Litoral de Tabasco Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Manager of the Integral Aceite Terciario del Golfo Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

2014

Mr. Primo Luis Velasco Paz

  

Deputy Director of Distribution and Trading

Born: 1959

Business experience: Regional Associate Managing Director of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Deputy Manager of Transportation and Distribution of Oil of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Deputy Manager of Engineering Design of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

   2011  

Mr. Rogelio Bartolomé Morando

SedasAmado Valeriano Astudillo Abundes

  

Deputy Director of Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection Audit (formerly known as Deputy Director of Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection)

Born: 19481960

Business experience: Advisor to the CorporateAssociate Managing Director of Auditing and Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection Regulations of Petróleos Mexicanos;Pemex-Exploration and Production; Associate Managing Director General of Industrias Tecnos, S.A. de C.V.;Operations of Pemex-Exploration and PlantProduction; and Manager of Dupont, S.A.the Integral Cantarell Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Other board memberships: Michin Cualli, S.C. de R.L. de C.V.

  

2003

2013

Mr. José Luis Fong Aguilar

  

Deputy Director of Production, Southwestern MarineSouthern region (formerly known as Deputy Director of the Southwestern Marine region)

Born: 1960

Business experience: ManagerDeputy Director of Integral Ku-Maloob-Zaap Business Unit (Northeastern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Manager of Integral Abkatún-Pol-Chuc Business UnitProduction (Southwestern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Manager of Integral Samaria-Luna Business Unit (Southern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production.Pemex-

   20102012  

Mr. Mario Alberto Ávila

Lizárraga

Deputy Director of Maintenance and Logistics (formerly known as Deputy Director of Marine Services Coordination) Born: 1964

Business experience: Federal Delegate of the Secretaría de Desarrollo Social in Campeche; General Manager of Campechana de Vehículos, S.A. de C.V.; and General Manager of Casitodo Campeche, S.A. de C.V.

2010

Pemex-Exploration and Production—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Pemex-Exploration and Production

  Year
Appointed
 
Exploration and Production; Manager of the Integral Ku-Maloob-Zaap Business Unit (Northeastern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Manager of the Integral Abkatún-Pol-Chuc Business Unit (Southwestern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Mr. Ernesto Estrada GonzálezJosé Guadalupe de la Garza Saldívar

Deputy Director of Maintenance and Logistics

Born: 1958

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Services for Projects (Southern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Associate Managing Director of Engineering of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing Director of Engineering and Construction of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

2013

Mr. Moisés Ithuriel Orozco García

  

Deputy Director of Management and Finance

Born: 19621968

Business experience: Director General of Economic Studies of the Comisión Federal de Competencia; Director of the Masters of Business Administration of the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México; andDeputy Director of Planning of Pemex-Gas and FinanceBasic Petrochemicals; Deputy Director of Vitro Vidrio Plano.

Other board memberships: Compañía Mexicana de Exploraciones, S.A. de C.V.; Administración Portuaria Integral Dos Bocas, S.A. de C.V.; Instalaciones Inmobiliarias para Industrias, S.A. de C.V.;Trading of Pemex-Refining; and I.I.I. Servicios, S.A. de C.V.Executive Advisor of the Director General’s Office of Petróleos Mexicanos.

   20112013  

Mr. Luis Sergio Guaso Montoya

  

Deputy Director of Business Development (formerly known as

Born: 1963

Business experience: Deputy Director of New Models of Execution)

Born: 1963

Business experience:Execution of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Executive Director of the Multiple Services Contracts of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing Director of Economic Analysis of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing Director of Investment Resources of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

   2003  

Mr.Dr. Pedro Silva López

  

Deputy Director of Technical Resources Administration (formerly known as Technical Deputy Director of Exploitation)

Born: 1953

Business experience: Deputy Director (Southwestern Marine region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Deputy Director of Operations Coordination of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Executive Director of the SGPStrategic Gas Program of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

   2009  

Mr. José Serrano LozanoFélix Alvarado Arellano

  

Deputy Director of Production, Northeastern Marine Region (formerly known as Deputy Director of the Northeastern Marine Region)

Born: 19561963

Business experience: Deputy Director (Southern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Manager of the Integral Samaria-LunaKu-Maloob-Zaap Business Unit (Southern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Manager of Integral Burgos Business Unit (Northern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

   2010

Mr. Vinicio Suro Pérez

Deputy Director of Production, Southern Region (formerly known as Deputy Director of the Southern Region)

Born: 1956

Business experience: Deputy Director of Planning and Evaluation of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Associate Managing Director of Hydrocarbon Reserves of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Chief of the Hydrocarbon Reserves Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Other board memberships: PMI Field Management Resources, S.L.

20102013  

Pemex-Exploration and Production—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Pemex-Exploration and Production

  Year
Appointed
and Production; Manager of the Integral Abkatún Pol Chuc Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Manager of the Integral Cinco Presidentes Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Mr. Plácido Gerardo Reyes Reza

Acting Deputy Director of Production, Northern Region

Born: 1964

Business experience: Acting Manager of the Integral Aceite Terciario del Golfo Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Manager of the Integral Burgos Business Unit of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Deputy Manager of Engineering and Design of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

2014  

Mr. José Antonio Escalera

Alcocer

  

Deputy Director of Exploration (formerly known as Technical Deputy Director of Exploration)

Born: 1958

Business experience: Manager of the Integral Burgos Business Unit (Northern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Manager of the Integral Poza Rica - AltamiraRica-Altamira Business Unit (Northern region) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing Director of Diagnosis and Risk Analysis of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Other board memberships: Compañía Mexicana de Exploraciones, S.A. de C.V.

  

2007

Mr. Baudelio Ernesto Prieto de la

Rocha

  

Deputy Director of Drilling Business Unit of Drilling

Born: 1957

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Engineering and Technology of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Associate Managing Director of Well Drilling and Maintenance (Marine)(Marine Division) of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Head of Burgos Operative Unit of Well Drilling and Maintenance (North)(Northern Division) of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

2011

Ms. Lucía Ileana Villalón Trujillo

Head of the Internal Control Body

Born: 1966

Business experience: Head of the Internal Control Body of Pemex-Refining; Head of the Internal Control Body of the Lotería Nacional para la Asistencia Pública; and Assistant Legal Secretary of the Instituto para la Protección al Ahorro Bancario.

   2011  

Pemex-Refining—Directors and Executive Officers

Pemex-Refining—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

  

Position with Pemex-Refining

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. Juan José Suárez CoppelEmilio Ricardo Lozoya Austin

  Chairman of the Board of Pemex-Refining (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   20092012  

Mr. Carlos Rafael Murrieta

Cummings

Board Member of Pemex-Refining (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2010

Mr. Carlos Alberto Treviño Medina

Board Member of Pemex-Refining (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)

2010

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo

  Board Member of Pemex-Refining (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   2010  

Mr. Jaime González AguadéFrancisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez

Board Member of Pemex-Refining (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2013

Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios

  Board Member of Pemex-Refining (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)Petróleos Mexicanos)   20112014  

Mr. Carlos Montaño FernándezMiguel Messmacher Linartas

  Board Member of Pemex-Refining (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)Petróleos Mexicanos)   20112013

Mr. Mario Alberto Beauregard Álvarez

Board Member of Pemex-Refining (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2013

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez

Professional Member of the Board of Directors of Pemex-Refining (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2010  

Mr. Ricardo Samaniego Breach

  

Professional Member of the Board of Directors of Pemex-Refining

Born: 1953

Business experience: Economics professor and researcher at the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México; Chief of Staff of the Secretary of Energy; and Chief of the Energy Policies and ProgramsOperations Unit of the Ministry of Energy.

   2010  

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez

Enríquez

Professional Member of the Board of Directors of Pemex-Refining (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2010

Mr. Miguel Tame Domínguez

  

Director General

Born: 1946

Business experience: Director General of Pemex-Refining; Deputy Director of Production of Pemex-Refining; and Associate Managing Director of Refinerythe “Miguel Hidalgo” Refinery of Pemex-Refining.

Other board memberships: Instituto Mexicano de Ingenieros Químicos; and Fundación Politécnico, A.C.

   2009  

Mr. Víctor Mario Navarrete

QuezadaMarco Antonio Velasco Monroy

  

Deputy Director of Trading

Born: 19721964

Business experience: Private SecretaryAdvisor of the Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos; AdvisorUndersecretary of Treasury of the Corporate Finance Office of Petróleos Mexicanos;Estado de México; and Advisor to the DeputyGeneral Director of Economic PlanningTreasury of Petróleos Mexicanos.the Estado of México.

Other board memberships: Mexicana de Lubricantes, S.A. de C.V.

  

2012

Pemex-Refining—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Pemex-Refining

Year
Appointed
2014
  

Mr. Francisco Fernández Lagos

  

Deputy Director of Distribution

Born: 1955

Business experience: Deputy Director of Pipeline Transportation System Coordination of Petróleos

2010

Pemex-Refining—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Pemex-Refining

Year
Appointed
Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Pipelines and Facilities Maintenance Management of Pemex-Exploration and Production; and Associate Managing DirectorDeputy Manager of Pipelines and Facilities Maintenance of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Mr. Jesús Lozano Peña

Deputy Director of Projects

Born: 1955

Business experience: Coordinator of Modernization and Capacity Expansion Projects of Pemex-Refining; Associate Managing Director of Modernization of Pemex Refining; and Advisor of the Corporate Engineering and Projects Development Office of Petróleos Mexicanos.

   20102013  

Mr. Francisco Guillermo Iturbide

RuizArmando García Espinosa

  

Deputy Director of ProjectsManagement and Finance

Born: 19511967

Business experience: Executive Coordinator of Petróleos Mexicanos; DeputyAssociate Managing Director of AgreementsBudgets of Pemex-Refining; Associate Managing Director of Financial Procedure Liaisons of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Associate Managing Director of AgreementsRegulations, Evaluation, Control and Liaisons of Pemex-Exploration and Production.

2012

Mr. Agustín Castro Pérez

Deputy Director of Management and Finance (formerly known as Deputy Director of Finance and Management) Born: 1962

Business experience: Deputy Director of Management and Finance of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; Associate Managing Director of Evaluation and Information of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; and Associate Managing Director of Programming of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.Petróleos Mexicanos.

Other board memberships: Instalaciones Inmobiliarias para Industrias, S.A.Mexicana de C.V.; and I.I.I. Servicios,Lubricantes, S.A. de C.V.

   20112013  

Mr. Guillermo Ruiz Gutiérrez

  

Deputy Director of Planning, Coordination and Evaluation

Born: 1959

Business experience: Deputy Director of Operations and Strategy Execution of Petróleos Mexicanos; Deputy Director of Strategy and Operative Planning of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Deputy Director of Operations Evaluation of Pemex-Refining.Petróleos Mexicanos.

   2011  

Mr. Carlos Rubén RamónAntonio Álvarez Moreno

  

Deputy Director of Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection Auditing

Born: 19571958

Business experience: Executive Coordinator of the Director General of Pemex-Refining; Deputy Director of Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection Auditing of Pemex-Refining; and Associate Managing Director of Industrial Safety and Occupational Health of Pemex-Refining.

2014

Mr. Tomás Ávila González

Deputy Director of Production

Born: 1960

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Storage and Allotment (Golfo)the Cadereyta refinery of Pemex-Refining; Deputy ManagerAssociate Managing Director of Industrial Safety and Environmental Protectionthe Salamanca refinery of Pemex-Refining; and Specialist Coordinator of Petróleos Mexicanos.Associate

   20122014  

Pemex-Refining—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

  

Position with Pemex-Refining

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. Pedro Ismael Hernández

Delgado1

Deputy Director of Production

Born: 1957

Business experience: Deputy Director of Maintenance Coordination of Petróleos Mexicanos; Associate Managing Director of Tracking the Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection System of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Associate Managing Director of Refineries MaintenanceMinatitlán refinery of Pemex-Refining.

Other board memberships: Corporación Mexicana de Investigación en Materiales, S.A. de C.V. (Alternate).

  

2012

Mr. Francisco Javier Fuentes

Saldaña

  

Deputy Director of Storage and Allotment

Born: 1964

Business experience: General Coordinator of the Operative Performance Improvement of the National Refining System of Pemex-Refining; Associate Managing Director of Business Development and Marketing of Pemex-Refining; and Associate Managing Director of Human Resources of Pemex-Refining and Director General of Planning of Diconsa, S.A. de C.V.

2010

Mr. Antonio Domínguez Sagols

Head of the Internal Control Body

Born: 1976

Business experience: Head of the Internal Control Body of PMI; Head of Liabilities Area and Head of Complaints Area of PMI; and Head of Auditing Area for Development and Improvement of the Public Administration of PMI.Pemex-Refining.

   20112010  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

 

1

Mr. Ismael Hernández Amor, President of P.M.I. Holdings North America, Inc., is the half-brother of Mr. Pedro Ismael Hernandez Delgado.

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

  

Position with Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. Juan José Suárez CoppelEmilio Ricardo Lozoya Austin

  Chairman of the Board of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   20092012  

Mr. Carlos Rafael Murrieta

Cummings

  

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2010

Mr. Carlos Alberto Treviño

Medina

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)

2010

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2007

Mr. Carlos Montaño Fernández

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)2011

Mr. Jaime González Aguadé

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)2011

Ms. María de Lourdes Dieck

Assad

Professional Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Born: 1954

Business experience: Director of the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Santa Fe; Director of the Government, Social Sciences and Humanities Departments of the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey; and Ambassador of Mexico to the European Union.

2010

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón

Professional Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   2010  

Mr. Francisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2013

Mr. Miguel Messmacher Linartas

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2013

Mr. Mario Alberto Beauregard Álvarez

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2013

Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios

Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2014

Ms. María de Lourdes Dieck Assad

Professional Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Born: 1954

Business experience: Director of the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Santa Fe Campus; Director of the Government, Social Sciences and Humanities Departments of the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey Campus; and Ambassador of Mexico to Belgium and Luxembourg and Chief of Mission to the European Union.

2010

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo

Professional Board Member of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Born: 1963

Business experience: Undersecretary of Hydrocarbons of the Ministry of Energy; President of the Comisión Nacional del Sistema de Ahorro para el Retiro; and Chief of Staff of the Secretary of Finance and Public Credit.

2012

Mr. Alejandro Martínez Sibaja

  

Director General of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Born: 1956

Business experience: Commercial Deputy Director of Natural Gas of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; Deputy Director of Operation and Strategy Execution of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Commercial Associate Managing Director of Transportation of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

   2011  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Year
Appointed

Mr. Roberto Jorge de la Huerta

Moreno

  

Deputy Director of Natural Gas

Born: 1972

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Control and Analysis of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; Deputy Manager of Business Development of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; and Coordinator of Natural Gas Regulation Area of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Other board memberships: MGI Enterprises U.S. LLC; President of MGI Enterprises, Ltd.; President of MGI Supply, Ltd.; and Chairman and President of MGI Trading, Ltd.

  

2012

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Year
Appointed

Mr. Juan Marcelo Parizot Murillo

  

Deputy Director of Liquefied Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Born: 1966

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Operations of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; Associate Managing Director of Trading Coordination of Pemex-Refining; and Associate Managing Director of Service Station Sales of Pemex-Refining.

Other board memberships: Vice President of Pasco Internacional, Limited; Vice President of Pasco Terminals; Vice President of Pan American Sulphur Company, Limited; Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V.; Chairman of MGI Supply Internacional, Ltd.; President of MGI Trading, Ltd.; and President of MGI Enterprises, Ltd.

   2012  

Mr. Moisés Ithuriel Orozco

GarcíaRodulfo Figueroa Alonso

  

Acting Deputy Director of Planning

Born: 19681964

Business experience: DeputyAssociate Managing Director of TradingPlanning of Pemex-Refining; Executive Advisor to the Director General’s Office of Petróleos Mexicanos;Pemex-Gas and CorporateBasic Petrochemicals; Associate Managing Director of ManagementAssessment and Information of Petróleos Mexicanos.Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; and Deputy Manager of Information of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

  

2012

2013

Mr. José Antonio Gómez Urquiza de la

Macorra

  

Deputy Director of Management and Finance

Born: 1951

Business experience: Deputy Director of Finance and Management of Pemex-Refining; Director General of the Cámara de la Industria del Hierro y del Acero; and Deputy Director of Management of the Delegación Benito Juárez in Mexico City.

  

 

2011

  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

 

Name

Position with Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Year
Appointed

Mr. Armando R.Ricardo Arenas Briones

  

Deputy Director of Production

Born: 1948

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of Nuevo Pemex PC;GPC; Superintendent of Nuevo Pemex PC;GPC; and General Coordinator of Acquisitions Engineering, Acquisition and Startup of Matapionche GPC of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Other board memberships: President of MGI Enterprises, Ltd.

   1996  

Mr. Víctor Domínguez CuéllarLuis Sánchez Graciano

  

Deputy Director of Pipelines

Born: 19591966

Business experience: Associate Managing Director of PlanningMeasuring System of Pemex-Refining; Associate Managing Director of Pipeline Transportation of Pemex-Refining; and EvaluationActing Deputy Director of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; Deputy ManagerDistribution of Planning of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals; and General Superintendent of Electromechanic Processes and Public Works of Pemex-Exploration and Production.Pemex-Refining.

Other board memberships: Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V.; Gasoductos de Tamaulipas, S. de R.L. de C.V.MGI Enterprises, Ltd.; MGI Supply, Ltd.; MGI Trading, Ltd.; and TDF,TAG Pipelines, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   20072014  

Mr. Carlos Benjamín Silva

Hernández

Alternate of the Head of the Internal Control Body and Head of the Liabilities Area

Born: 1963

Business experience: Legal Counsel of Corporate and Mortgage Products of Banco Santander, S.A.; Legal Counsel of Financial Markets of Banco Santander, S.A.; and Legal Counsel of Banking Products of Banco Santander, S.A.

Pemex-Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

 

2012

Pemex-Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

  

Position with Pemex-Petrochemicals

  Year
Appointed
 

Mr. Juan José Suarez CoppelEmilio Ricardo Lozoya Austin

  Chairman of the Board of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   20092012  

Mr. Carlos Rafael Murrieta

Cummings

Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2010

Mr. Carlos Alberto Treviño

Medina

Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)

2010

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo

  Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   2010  

Mr. Carlos Montaño FernándezFrancisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez

Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)

2013

Mr. Miguel Messmacher Linartas

  Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)Petróleos Mexicanos)   20112013  

Mr. Jaime González AguadéMario Alberto Beauregard Álvarez

  Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Pemex-Exploration and Production)Petróleos Mexicanos)   20112013

Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios

Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)2014  

Ms. María de Lourdes Dieck

Assad

  

Professional Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals)

  

2010

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón

  Professional Board Member of Pemex-Petrochemicals (refer to Petróleos Mexicanos)   2010  

Mr. Rafael Beverido LomelíManuel Sánchez Guzmán

  

Director General

Born: 19421949

Business experience: Vice President of the Asociación Nacional de la Industria Química; Member of the Asociación Mundial de Productores de Hule Sintético and the Asociación de Industriales del Estado de Tamaulipas; and Director General of Industrias Negromex, S.A. de C.V.

2001

Mr. Manuel Sánchez Guzmán

Deputy Director of Planning

Born: 1949

Business experience: of Pemex-Petrochemicals; Associate Managing Director of Studies and Projects of Pemex-Petrochemicals; and Advisor to the Director General of Pemex-Petrochemicals; and Director General of Human Resources of Grupo ICA,Pemex-Petrochemicals.

Other board memberships: Petroquímica Mexicana de Vinilo, S.A. de C.V.

   20092013  

Mr. Jorge Collard de la Rocha

  

Deputy Director of Management and Finance

Born: 1951

Business experience: Deputy Director of Management and Finance of Pemex-Exploration and Production; Acting Deputy Director of Supplies of Petróleos Mexicanos; and Chief Financial Officer of Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C., Institución de Banca de Desarrollo.

   2011

Pemex-Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

Name

Position with Pemex-Petrochemicals

Year
Appointed
  

Mr. Francisco Arturo Arellano

Urbina

  

Deputy Director of Operations

Born: 1946

Business experience: Director of Petroquímica Cangrejera, S.A. de C.V.; Director General of Micosa División Construcciones, S.A. de C.V.; and Director General of RCR Ingenieros Asociados, S.A. de C.V.

  

2005

Pemex-Petrochemicals—Directors and Executive Officers

 

2005

Name

Position with Pemex-Petrochemicals

Year
Appointed

Mr. Carlos Xavier Pani Espinosa

  

Deputy Director of Trading

Born: 1947

Business experience: Head of the Fénix Project Executive Unit of Pemex-Petrochemicals; Deputy Director of Trading of Pemex-Refining; and Deputy Director of Trading of Pemex-Petrochemicals

Pemex-Petrochemicals. Other board memberships: Asociación Petroquímica Latinoamericana.y Química Latinoamericana; Industriales de la Bolsa Plástica; Asociación Nacional de la Industria del Plástico; Founders Club; and Centro de Investigación en Química Aplicada.

  

2007

Mr. Luis Guillermo Pineda

BernalRafael Montanaro Sánchez

  

HeadDeputy Director of the Internal Control BodyPlanning

Born: 19561969

Business experience: HeadAssociate Managing Director of Liabilities Area and Head of Complaints AreaMorelos PC of Pemex-Petrochemicals; HeadAssociate Managing Director of Liabilities AreaStrategic Planning and Business Development of Petroquímica Cosoleacaque, S.A. de C.V.;Pemex-Petrochemicals; and HeadAssociate Managing Director of Liabilities Area and HeadStrategic Analysis of Complaints Area of Petroquímica Escolín, S.A. de C.V.Pemex-Petrochemicals.

  

2010

2013

Compensation of Directors and Officers

For the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, the aggregate compensation of executive officers of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities (73(79 persons) paid or accrued in that year for services in all capacities was approximately Ps. 154.4174.8 million. Except in the case of the professional members, members of the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities do not receive compensation for their services. The compensation paid or accrued during 20112013 to the professional members of the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities was approximately Ps. 13.713.6 million.

Board Practices

Except in the case of the professional members, neither the members of the Boards of Directors nor the executive officers of Petróleos Mexicanos or the subsidiary entities are appointed for a specific term. Except for those selected by the Petroleum Workers’ Union and the professional members, the members of the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and each of the subsidiary entities, and the Directors General of Petróleos Mexicanos and each of the subsidiary entities, serve subject to the discretion of the President of Mexico. Except in the case of the professional members first appointed under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, the four professional members will be appointed for six-year terms, and may be appointed for an additional term of the same length.

On June 17, 2009, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos, for the first time, appointed members to and convened the seven committees established in the Petróleos Mexicanos Law to support its work. The memberships of these committees consist of the Mexican Government representatives who act as Board members of Petróleos Mexicanos and the professional board members of Petróleos Mexicanos. See “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee

The Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos (which we refer to as the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee) is required, among other duties, to oversee our management and evaluate our financial and operational performance, as well as to appoint and evaluate our external auditors, set their compensation and make determinations as to whether to select other auditors. See “Item 16C—Principal Accountant Fees and Services.”

Each member of the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee is “independent” of Petróleos Mexicanos within the meaning of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).

The Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos consists of the following members:

 

Mr. Jorge José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez,Borja Navarrete, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Chairman of the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee;

and

 

Mr. Héctor Moreira Rodríguez, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.

A permanent representative of the SFP attends and may speak at the committee’s sessions, but has no voting power.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is chaired by a professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and, among other duties, proposes the compensation of the Director General and other members of senior management of Petróleos Mexicanos, up to three levels below the Director General, based on their performance and measurable results.

The Compensation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos consists of the following members:

 

Mr. Héctor Moreira Rodríguez, professionalLuis Videgaray Caso, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Chairman of the Compensation Committee;

Mexicanos;

 

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez, professionalMs. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

 

Mr. José Antonio González Anaya,Miguel Messmacher Linartas, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

 

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo,Francisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Strategy and Investment Committee

The Strategy and Investment Committee is chaired by a professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and, among other duties, analyzes the business plan and investment portfolio of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities. This committee also supervises and evaluates investments made by Petróleos Mexicanos.

The Strategy and Investment Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos consists of the following members:

 

Mr. Héctor Moreira Rodríguez,José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Chairman of the Strategy and Investment Committee;

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez, professionalLuis Videgaray Caso, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

 

Mr. Rogelio Gasca Neri, professionalFrancisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

Mr. José Antonio Meade Kuribreña,Miguel Messmacher Linartas, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

 

Mr. José Antonio González Anaya,Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Transparency and Accountability Committee

This committee, among other duties, proposes to the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos criteria for the disclosure of information. The Transparency and Accountability Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos consists of the following members:

 

Mr. Rogelio Gasca Neri,José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Chairman of the Transparency and Accountability Committee;

 

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz AlarcóLuis Videgaray Caso, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

Mr. Francisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán professionalRodríguez, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

 

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo,Miguel Messmacher Linartas, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Development and Technological Research Committee

This committee, among other duties, proposes to the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos technological research and development plans related to the petroleum industry. The Development and Technological Research Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos consists of the following members:

 

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Chairman of the Development and Technological Research Committee;

 

Mr. Rogelio Gasca Neri, professionalIldefonso Guajardo Villareal, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

 

Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

Mr. José Antonio González Anaya,Francisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

 

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo,Miguel Messmacher Linartas, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Environmental and Sustainability Committee

This committee, among other duties, is responsible for promoting the development by PEMEX of environmental protection policies and the achievement of sustainable development. The Environmental and Sustainability Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos consists of the following members:

 

Mr. Rogelio Gasca Neri,Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Chairman of the Environmental and Sustainability Committee;

and

 

Mr. Héctor Moreira Rodríguez, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.

A permanent representative of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources attends and may speak at the committee’s sessions, but has no voting power.

Acquisitions, Leasing, Works and Services Committee

This committee, among other duties, reviews, evaluates, monitors and develops recommendations regarding the annual programs of Petróleos Mexicanos for acquisition, construction and services contracts, and determines

whether an exception to the public bidding process is applicable in specific cases. The Acquisitions, Leasing, Works and Services Committee consists of the following members:

 

Mr. Jorge José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez,Borja Navarrete, professional member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and Chairman of the Acquisitions, Leasing, Works and Services Committee;

 

Mr. Fluvio César Ruíz Alarcón, professionalIldefonso Guajardo Villareal, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

 

Mr. José Antonio González Anaya,Ms. María de Lourdes Melgar Palacios, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos;

 

Mr. Mario Gabriel Budebo,Miguel Messmacher Linartas, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos; and

 

Mr. José Antonio Meade Kuribreña,Francisco Leonardo Fabio Beltrán Rodríguez, member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos.

A permanent representative of the SFP attends and may speak at the committee’s sessions, but has no voting power.

Employees

Excluding employees of the PMI Group and including those employed by us on a temporary basis, at December 31, 2011,2013, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities had 150,561154,774 employees, as compared to 147,368150,697 at December 31, 2010.2012. During 2011,2013, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities employed an average of 17,16918,417 temporary employees. The following table sets forth the number of employees of Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary entities and the PMI Group at year-end for the past five years.

 

  At December 31,   2011
% of Total
   At December 31,   2013
% of Total
 
  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   

Pemex-Exploration and Production

   49,045     50,273     50,544     49,802     51,713           34.3   50,544     49,802     51,713     51,998     53,404     34.4

Pemex-Refining

   44,811     45,510     43,706     45,306     46,909     31.1     43,706     45,306     46,909     46,236     47,980     30.9  

Pemex-Petrochemicals

   13,823     14,028     13,447     13,542     13,541     9.0     13,447     13,542     13,541     13,487     13,758     8.9  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

   12,397     12,976     12,550     12,327     11,918     7.9     12,550     12,327     11,918     12,191     12,905     8.3  

Petróleos Mexicanos

   21,070     20,634     24,899     26,391     26,480     17.5     24,899     26,391     26,480     26,785     26,727     17.2  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Subtotal

   141,146     143,421     145,146     147,368     150,561     99.8     145,146     147,368     150,561     150,697     154,774     99.8  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

PMI Group

   320     322     315     324     323     0.2     315     324     323     325     332     0.2  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   141,466     143,743     145,461     147,692     150,884     100.0   145,461     147,692     150,884     151,022     155,106     100.0
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Source: Petróleos Mexicanos and the PMI Group.

The Petroleum Workers’ Union represents approximately 72%71.4% of the work force of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities. The members of the Petroleum Workers’ Union members are ourPEMEX employees and they elect their own leadership from among their ranks. Since the Petroleum Workers’ Union’s official establishment in 1938, we have experienced no labor strikes, and although we have experienced work stoppages for short periods of time, none of these stoppages has had a significant material adverse effect on our operations.

Our relationship with our employees is regulated by theLey Federal del Trabajo(Federal Labor Law)Law and a collective bargaining agreement between Petróleos Mexicanos and the Petroleum Workers’ Union. The collective bargaining agreement regulates extensively all aspects of the relationship of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities with their employees. The collective bargaining agreement is subject to renegotiation every two years, although salaries are reviewed annually. Since the Petroleum Workers’ Union’s was officially established in 1938, we have not experienced labor strikes; we have experienced work stoppages for short periods of time, but none of these stoppages had a material adverse effect on our operations.

On July 27, 2011,29, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos and the Petroleum Workers’ Union entered into a new collective bargaining agreement, which became effective on August 1, 2011.2013. The new agreement provides for a 4.75%3.99% increase in wages and a 1.15%1.98% increase in benefits. By its terms, the new collective bargaining agreement is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2013.2015.

In accordance with the collective bargaining agreement and the Federal Labor Law, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are under an obligation to pay seniority premiums to retiring employees and pensions to retired employees, as well as death benefits and pensions to the survivors of retired employees. Retirees are entitled to receive increases in their pensions whenever salary increases are granted to current employees. We also provide health and medical benefits to employees, retired employees and their families and, subject to our overall budgetary constraints, we provide an interest-rate subsidy on employees’ mortgage loans.

On November 5, 1997, the SHCP and the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos authorized the formation of a trust called the Pemex Labor Fund. This fund is a vehicle to fund labor liabilities, current pension payments and seniority premiums. We have designed a contribution plan to increase the funds held in this trust and to continue to make payments on outstanding labor and pension liabilities. Our contributions to the plan assets for theour retirement benefits of PEMEX totaled Ps. 24,76030,796 million in 20102012 and Ps. 28,86833,210 million in 2011.2013.

 

Item 7.Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

Major Shareholders

Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities have no shareholders because they are decentralized public entities of the Mexican Government. The Mexican Government closely regulates and supervises our operations; it incorporates the annual budget and financing programs of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities into its consolidated annual budget, which it submits to the Chamber of Deputies for approval.

Mexican Government officials hold six of the 15 seats on the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos, and the Secretary of Energy is the Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos. An additional four seats on the Board of Directors are held by professional members appointed by the President of Mexico and ratified by the Senate. The various committees of the Board of Directors are comprised only of Mexican Government representatives,i.e., a combination of Mexican Government officials and professional members of the Board of Directors. The Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos is a member of the President of Mexico’s cabinet. See also “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to theOur Relationship between PEMEX andwith the Mexican Government.”

Related Party Transactions

Under Article 8, Section XI of theLey Federal de Responsabilidades Administrativas de los Servidores Públicos (Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Officials), which applies to our directors and all of our employees, our directors and employees are obligated to “recuse themselves from intervening in any way in the attention to, processing or resolution of matters in which they might have personal, family or business interest, including those where some benefit can result for themselves, their spouse, blood or affinity relatives up to the fourth degree, or civil relatives, or for third parties with which they have professional, labor or business relations, or for partners or partnerships where the public officials or the persons referred above are or have been members thereof.”

Additionally, in accordance with the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, a member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos or of the board of directors of a subsidiary entity may be removed from his or her position for, among other causes: (1) utilizing for personal benefit or for the benefit of any third party the information made available to him or her in connection with the exercise of his or her duties as a board member; (2) disclosing such information in violation of applicable law; or (3) not recusing him or herself from discussion

of and voting on matters in respect of which he or she has a conflict of interest. A member of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos or of the board of directors of a subsidiary entity who acts in contravention of the Petróleos Mexicanos Law may be held liable for any damages thereby caused to Petróleos Mexicanos or a subsidiary entity.

As an employee benefit, we offer salary advances to all of our eligible Petroleum Workers’ Union and non-union workers, including our executive officers, pursuant to the programs set forth in the collective bargaining agreement and in theReglamento de Trabajo del Personal de Confianza de Petróleos Mexicanos y Organismos

Subsidiarios (Employment Regulation of White Collar Employees of Petróleos Mexicanos and Subsidiary Entities)SubsidiaryEntities), respectively. Therespectively.The salary advances, which are non-interest bearing, are offered to each eligible employee in an amount up to a maximum of four months’ salary and are repaid through salary deductions in equal installments over a period of either one or two years, as elected by the employee. Most of our employees take advantage of this benefit. The largest amount of salary advances outstanding to executive officers at any one time during 20112013 was Ps. 21.026.9 million. As of March 31, 2012,2014, the aggregate amount of salary advances outstanding to our executive officers was Ps. 18.7 million.21.6 million.

Prior to his appointment as Secretary of Energy, Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos since December 2012, as well as certain members of his family, held ownership interests in companies that have entered into agreements with Pemex-Refining for the sale and purchase of gasoline and other products by certain retail service stations and a wholesale distributor, as well as the performance of other related activities. As of the date of this report, their ownership interests are as follows:

 

Company

Name

Ownership
Share

Servicio Cozumel, S.A. de C.V.

(which operates a retail service station)

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell

Mr. Pedro Oscar Joaquín Delbouis

(son of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)

Mr. Nassim Joaquín Delbouis

(son of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)


60

20

20


Planta de Combustible Cozumel, S.A. de C.V.

(which operates as a wholesale distributor)

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell

Mr. Fausto Nassim Joaquín Ibarra

(father of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)


40

60


Gasolinera y Servicios Juárez, S.A. de C.V.

(which operates a retail service station)

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell

Mr. Fausto Nassim Joaquín Ibarra

Mr. Ignacio Nassim Ruiz Joaquín

(nephew of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)


40

40

20


Combustibles Caleta, S.A. de C.V.

(which operates a retail service station)

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell

Mr. Pedro Oscar Joaquín Delbouis

Mr. Nassim Joaquín Delbouis

Mr. Fausto Nassim Joaquín Ibarra

Mr. Ignacio Nassim Ruiz Joaquín


20

20

20

20

20


Combustibles San Miguel, S.A. de C.V.

(which operates a retail service station)

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell

Mr. Pedro Oscar Joaquín Delbouis

Mr. Nassim Joaquín Delbouis

Mr. Ignacio Nassim Ruiz Joaquín


25

25

25

25


The rights of these companies to operate retail service stations and distribute gasoline and other products on a wholesale basis in Mexico are dependent on these agreements, the expiration or non-renewal of which may adversely affect their business. These agreements are based on our standard forms of agreements and contain the standard terms and conditions applicable to all of Pemex-Refining’s retail service stations and wholesale distributors.

Item 8.Financial Information

Legal Proceedings

Labor-Related Proceedings

We are a party to various legal actions involving labor claims of former and present employees. These labor disputes relate to severance payments, life insurance benefits, extensions of labor contracts, level of wages, improper termination and employee housing. We do not expect these lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or future results of operations.

For information on our negotiations with the Petroleum Workers’ Union and collective bargaining agreements, see “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees.”

Mexican Government Audits and Other Investigations

Certain rules have been enacted in order to promote a culture of ethics and prevent corruption in our daily operations. On July 31, 2002, aCódigo de Ética de los Servidores Públicos de la Administración Pública Federal (Code of Ethics for Public Servants of the Federal Public Administration) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, containing rules to promote legality, honesty, integrity, loyalty, impartiality and efficiency in the performance of public work by public sector officials and employees, including PEMEX’sour directors, officers and employees. On October 3, 2003, we announced a corporate code of conduct for Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities, theCódigo de Conducta de Petróleos Mexicanos y Organismos Subsidiarios(Code of Conduct of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities) that defines the code of conduct expected from all employees of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities in the daily performance of their duties, and which is designed to promote transparency and prevent abuses. In addition, on May 12, 2004, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos adopted a Code of Ethics for our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and all other employees performing similar functions in Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary entities and the subsidiary companies. For more information on this Code of Ethics, see “Item 16B—Code of Ethics.” We expect that these efforts will result in a more effective system of internal controls. More recently, onOn June 3, 2011, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos approved theCódigo de Conducta de los Miembros del Consejo de Administración de Petróleos Mexicanos (Code of Conduct of the Members of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos). OnIn addition, on March 6, 2012, general guidelines to establish permanent measures to ensure the integrity and ethical behavior of public officers in performing their jobs, positions or commission work were published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. These guidelines provide that an ethics committee, consisting of our employees and officers, will be formed and given the following responsibilities: evaluate the Code of Conduct of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities; issue,

implement and enforce a new or updated code of conduct applicable to all of our employees; and verify compliance with the Code of Ethics for Public Servants of the Federal Public Administration.

In MarchMay 2005, the SFP announced that it had fined several former officers of Petróleos Mexicanos, alleging that these officers had illegally diverted Petróleos Mexicanos’ funds to members of the Petroleum Workers’ Union. In December 2009, the SFP announced it had fined Mr. Montemayor, former Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos, for Ps. 1,421.1 million.million and banned him from holding public sector positions for 20 years. In April 2010, Mr. Montemayor filed an appeal against this penalty before theTribunal Federal de Justicia Fiscal y Administrativa (Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice). AOn January 24, 2013, a judgment was issued confirming Mr. Montemayor’s ban from holding public sector positions but declaring the economic penalty null and void due to the inadequacy of the process by which this penalty was calculated. As of the date of this report, a final resolution of this appeal is still pending.

In July 2007, the SFP announced that it had fined, among others, Mr. Raúl Muñoz Leos, former Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos, and Mr. Juan Carlos Soriano Rosas, former General Counsel of Petróleos Mexicanos, each for an amount of Ps. 862.2 million and banned each of themhim from holding public sector positions for ten years for allegedly breaking budgetary laws and regulations in connection with a side agreement (No. 10275/04) dated August 1, 2004, between Petróleos Mexicanos and the Petroleum Workers’ Union. On August 25, 2005, Petróleos Mexicanos and the Petroleum Workers’ Union amended this side agreement in order

to make certain adjustments required by applicable regulations. These penalties have beenwere appealed by the former officers.officer. On August 4, 2010, the Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice issued a resolution confirming Mr. Muñoz Leos’ liability for executing this side agreement, but declared the economic penalty null and void. The former officers filedvoid due to the fact that no economic damages were caused as a motion to review thisresult of the side agreement. On September 6, 2012, the SFP issued a new resolution and anamparo.A final resolution foragainst Mr. Muñoz Leos’ claim is still pending. On September 21, 2011, a judgment was issuedLeos confirming that the resolution against Mr. Soriano Rosas was null and void. Therefore, Mr. Soriano Rosas’ claim has concluded.

In December 2007, the SFP announced that it had fined Mr. Jaime Mario Willars Andrade, former Director General of Pemex-Refining, and Mr. Luis Ricardo Bouchot Guerrero, former Head of the Legal Department of Pemex-Refining, each for an amount of Ps. 1,390.3 million for administrative negligence relateddecision to the early termination of a long-term supply and services contract for the construction of a methyl tert-butyl ether plant, and that it had banned these officersban him from holding public sector positions infor ten years. Mr. Muñoz Leos filed a motion against this resolution before the future. In April 2009, these former officers appealed these penalties beforeTercera Sala Regional Metropolitana(Third Regional Metropolitan Court) of the Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice. On September 27, 2011, the court issued a judgment that confirmed the administrative penalty banning these former officers from holding public sector positions in the future. In addition, the Court declared the economic penalty null and void, requesting the SFP to provide sufficient arguments to support it. The SFP filed a motion to appeal this resolution, a final resolution ofJustice, which is still pending.pending as of the date of this report.

In March and April 2010, the SFP filed 157 criminal complaints against officers and employees ofPemex-Refining, in connection with a pipeline rupture in Nanchital, Veracruz,Veracruz. In August 2013, the Federal Attorney General’s Office notified the SFP that it was closing the investigation ofrelated to the criminal complaints against the officers and employees. The SFP has filed a motion against this resolution, which is still pending.pending as of the date of this report. In addition,a concurrent proceeding, the SFP imposed administrative penalties against these officers and employees, as well as against contractors. The officers employees and contractorsemployees filed appeals to the 2528 administrative penalties, six15 of which have concluded with the following results: threeten penalties were confirmed twoand five penalties were declared null and void and one penalty was granted anamparo, which now requires a new resolution to be issued.void. As of the date of this report, final resolutions forof the 13 other 19 administrative penalties appealed by these officers and employees are still pending. The contractors filed appeals to nine administrative penalties, four of which have concluded with the following results: one penalty was confirmed and three penalties were declared null and void. As of the date of this report, final resolutions of the five other administrative penalties appealed by these contractors are still pending.

In May 2010, the SFP filed two criminal complaints and initiated several administrative proceedings against María Karen Miyazaki Hara, who served as PMI’s Deputy Director of Trading of Intermediate Distillates, for allegedly committing acts of corruption pursuant to which PMI lost revenues of approximately U.S. $13 million. The alleged acts involved the unauthorized sale of ultra low sulfur diesel for the economic benefit of foreign companies, including Blue Oil Trading Ltd. During November 2010, the administrative proceedings concluded, resulting in Ms. Miyazaki Hara being fined Ps. 164.2 million and receiving a 20 year ban from public sector employment. Ms. Miyazaki Hara filed a claim before the Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice seeking that this resolution be declared null and void. As of the date of this report, the trial is in the evidentiary stage. Once this stage concludes, the Superior Court of the Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice will review Ms. Miyazaki Hara’s claim. In addition, on June 25, 2013, the SFP fined Ms. Miyazaki Hara for Ps. 59.3 million and banned her from holding public sector positions for 20 years. On September 23, 2013, Ms. Miyazaki Hara filed a finalmotion against this resolution is still pending. Thebefore the Federal Court of Fiscal and Administrative Justice seeking that this additional resolution also be declared null and void. As of the date of this report, an order for Ms. Miyazaki Hara’s arrest has been issued in connection with one criminal complaint, and the investigation of the other criminal complaintscomplaint is still underway.

In December 2010, the SFP announced that it had fined 1415 officers and employees of Pemex-Refining and banned them from holding public sector positions for ten years for their alleged involvement in an illegal bidding process for the leasing of four tankers. These officers and employees have appealed these penalties,resolutions. On appeal, ten of the resolutions were confirmed. The other five resolutions are still pending as of the date of this report—four are subject to motions by the SFP, while one is being reviewed by the Superior Court of the Federal Court of Fiscal and a final resolution is pending.Administrative Justice.

On October 11, 2011, the SFP announced that it had fined three former officers of PMI an aggregate amount of Ps. 267.8 million and had dismissed and fined the Director General of PMI, Ms. María del Rocío Cárdenas Zubieta, an amount offor Ps. 238.9 million, for allegedly committing acts of corruption during the period from January 2008 to January 2009. The alleged acts involved the use of improper contracting practices in the purchase and/or sale of petroleum products, which allegedly benefited certain of PMI’s commercial counterparties and resulted in financial harm to PMI in the amount of U.S. $25.7 million. Ms. Cárdenas Zubieta and the implicated ex-officers of PMI were also barred from public sector employment for a period of 10ten years and mightmay face criminal charges.

These former officers have appealed these penaltiesthe penalties. On November 7, 2013, a judgment was issued confirming the resolution against Ms. Cárdenas Zubieta. As of the date of this report, Ms. Cárdenas Zubieta has yet to file a motion against this resolution, and a final resolution isthe resolutions against the other former officers are still pending.

In July 2011, a criminal complaint was filed against Mario Blenda Ahumada, former Deputy Director of Trade and Refined Products of PMI, after a Ps. 11 million increase in his personal assets was detected. As of the date of this report, the investigation of the criminal complaint is still underway.

On February 10, 2014, the SFP announced in the Official Gazette of the Federation that it had fined Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (or Oceanografía), a Mexican oil-services firm, and banned it from bidding for and entering into government contracts, including contracts with us, for approximately one year and nine months. The fine and related ban resulted from the failure of Oceanografía to issue performance guarantees in connection with certain contracts between Oceanografía and Pemex-Exploration and Production. As of the date of this report, the SFP is conducting several investigations into the conduct of certain of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s current and former officers or employees in connection with its contracts with Oceanografía.

On April 9, 2014, the SEC issued an order imposing sanctions against Hewlett-Packard Company (or HP) based on its findings that HP’s subsidiaries in Mexico, Russia and Poland made improper payments to certain public officials in order to obtain public contracts in violation of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In the case related to Mexico, the sanctions related in part to allegations that Hewlett-Packard México, S. de R.L. de C.V., an HP subsidiary in Mexico, paid a Mexican information-technology and consulting company more than U.S. $1 million to win a software and licensing contract with Petróleos Mexicanos worth approximately U.S. $6 million. The SEC’s order alleged that a former officer of Petróleos Mexicanos received a portion of the HP subsidiary’s unlawful payment to the consulting company. As of the date of this report, we are conducting an internal investigation into the tendering of this software and licensing contract by Petróleos Mexicanos to HP’s Mexican subsidiary.

Actions Against the Illicit Market in Fuels

The main characteristics of the illicit market in fuels are:

 

illegal tapping of our pipelines, which threatens the integrity of our pipeline system, thereby increasing the associated risks to personnel, facilities, the general population and the environment;

 

tampering with product quality, which negatively impacts consumers and our reputation; and

 

theft and illegal trade in fuels, which reduce our revenues by the amount that would have been generated from the sale of the stolen products, and reduce our net income, because the production cost of stolen product is included in our cost of sales.

In conjunction with the SHCP and the Ministry of Energy, we have implemented several actions to combat the illicit market in fuels, with the objective of eliminating the associated risks described above to personnel, facilities, the general population and the environment, as well as minimizing losses of our refined products, crude oil and condensates. We seek to prevent orand deter theft in the workplace by analyzing information provided by certain measurement systems, field surveillance and control instruments. These include mobile laboratories, volumetric control at service stations, terminal operations measurement, satellite tracking, integrated control systems, closed circuit television and online measurement systems.

In particular, during 2011,2013, we implemented the following strategic measures in order to decrease incidents of theft in our facilities:

 

Increased pipeline surveillance by 18.0% as compared to 2012. Inspected 1,075rights-of-way and facilities at an average of 33,041 kilometers of pipelines, of which 392 kilometers were located in the Northern region, 183 kilometers were located in the Central region, 305 kilometers were located in the Southeastern regionper day by vehicles and 195 kilometers were located in the Western region, through the use of in-line devices known as go-devils, which led to the identification of 41 incidents of illegal tapping.

Increased pipeline surveillance, as well as right-of-way and facilities inspection to an average of 20,000 kilometers per day by vehicles and 700584 kilometers per day by foot during 2013, as compared to 28,000 kilometers per day by vehicles and 770 kilometers per day by foot during 2012,

in coordination with theSecretaría de la Defensa Nacional (Ministry of National Defense) and the Ministry of the Navy.

In 2011, we operated 53 mobile laboratories and we will acquire 24 additional units in 2012, for a total of 77 in operation. In 2011, these mobile laboratories made approximately 29,827 visits to gas stations in Mexico in order to test the quality of our products and prevent the sale of tampered products.

Monitored gas stations through volumetric control data in collaboration with theServicio de Administración Tributaria (Tax Management Service) and theSistema Nacional de Protección Civil (National System of Civil Protection).

Maintained and updated the satellite tracking systems in 1,360 tankers owned by PEMEX, which detect illegal route deflections in the delivery of gasoline to monitored gas stations.

Commenced expansion of the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) measurement system, which, along with ultrasonic flow measurers, aided in the detection of 46 incidents of illegal tapping in the Cactus-Guadalajara 24”-20”-14” LPG Line. We estimate that by June 30, 2012, the SCADA system will be fully installed and will monitor and control seven pipelines, and by 2014, there will be 47 additional systems integrated into SCADA.

Used closed-circuit television to monitor 31 storage terminals, which led to the discovery of five employees manipulating measurement systems during an unloading operation, resulting in their termination.

Coordinated with states and the Mexican Government to create 22 regional groups to manage and immediately respond to emergencies, such as spills or explosions, caused by illegal tapping into pipelines.

Created eight specialized groups to respond to spills and emergencies.

Collaborated with the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of the Navy,, the Federal Attorney General’s Office and thePolicía Federal (Federal Police) Ministry of the Navy. These efforts led to intensifythe identification and sealing of 3,278 illegal pipeline taps, as compared to the sealing of 1,744 illegal pipeline taps during 2012, which represented an increase of 88.0%. This increase was due both to an increase in the number of criminal attempts to divert our products, as well as to additional surveillance of pipelines.efforts.

 

Entered into agreements with various state governments relatingMaintained programs that encourage anonymous citizens to civil defense, confidentiality and information sharing, including the map of our strategic facilities.

Coordinated with theSecretaría de Seguridad Pública (Ministry of Public Security) to establish a toll-free number to receive public reports of emergencies in PEMEX’s facilities and rights-of-way.

Encouraged anonymous citizen reporting ofreport illicit market activities through the creation of toll-free numbers and a dedicated email address, as well as campaigns and public announcements in mass media outlets, including radio, newspapers, television and the internet.

internet, which help us identify and respond to incidents of illegal tapping.

The preventive actions, conducting

As of in-line inspections and timely monitoring and analysisthe date of pipeline pressure drops, each as described above, have allowed us to detect illegal pipeline taps more quickly, and have reduced our time of exposure to theft. Notwithstanding these improvements in our security and monitoring systems, the estimated lost volume of gasoline and diesel during 2011 was 3.5 million barrels, 150% greater than the 1.4 million barrels of estimated lost volume during 2010. In addition, the estimated lost volume of crude oil and condensates during 2011 was 3.3 million barrels, 5.7% less than the 3.5 million barrels of estimated lost volume during 2010 (an amount whichthis report, we have revised fromintegrated 11 pipelines into our supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) measurement system. We aim to incorporate an additional 47 pipelines into the totalSCADA system by December 2014.

Together, these activities led to the recovery of 2.3 million barrels19,185,432 liters of estimated lost volume of crude oil and condensates during 2010 that we previously reported, due to revisionshydrocarbon products in our methodology for estimating lost volume).

In connection with the effort to combat the incidence of theft in the national pipeline system, we carried out, in coordination with the Ministry of National Defense, the Secretary of the Navy and the Federal Attorney General’s Office in 2011, the identification and sealing of 1,419 illegal pipeline taps.

The estimated lost volume of gasoline and diesel due to illicit activities during the period from January to March 2012 was 0.80 million barrels, 5.3% greater than the 0.76 million barrels of estimated lost volume during the same period of 2011. In addition, the estimated lost volume of crude oil and condensates during the period from January to March 2012 was 0.70 million barrels, 25.5% less than the 0.94 million barrels of estimated lost volume during the same period of 2011.2013.

During the first three months of 2012,2014, we have implementedcontinued implementing several strategic measures in order to decrease incidents of theft in our facilities, including the performance of onea technical operational assessment in PEMEXour facilities, in order to verify the proper application of our operating procedures regarding the measurement and distribution of our products and to detect those areas most vulnerable to illegal activities. In addition, in connection with the effort to combat the incidence of theft in the national pipeline system, we carried out pipeline surveillance, as well as right-of-way and facilities inspections, which totaled an average of 37,735 kilometers per day by vehicles and 1,120 kilometers per day by foot during this period. These activities were carried out in

coordination with the Ministry of National Defense, the Secretary of the Navy and the Federal Attorney General’s Office inthrough a total of 16,181 surveillance events. Our efforts during this period led to the first three monthsrecovery of 2012,4,999,865 liters of hydrocarbon products and the identification and sealing of 384764 illegal pipeline taps (351 in Pemex-Refining pipelines, 22 in Pemex-Exploration and Production pipelines and 11 in Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals pipelines) from January through May 2012. The states with the highest incidence of illegal taps in this period were: Tamaulipas with 54, Veracruz with 50, Sinaloa with 42, Nuevo León with 34 and Puebla with 26.taps. A corresponding criminal report was filed in each of these cases, which resulted in 52306 individuals being charged with hydrocarbons theft.theft and 631 vehicles that were used to transport stolen products being held in custody.

On June 7, 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed a civil claim (4:10-cv-01997) before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas against BASF Corporation;several companies and individuals seeking damages for the illegal acquisition, possession and sale of stolen petroleum products from Pemex-Exploration and Production facilities in the Burgos basin. Subsequently, this claim was amended to include additional defendants allegedly involved in the illegal purchase and resale of stolen petroleum products originating in Mexico. In February 2014, a hearing was held with respect to this claim and the parties were notified that a jury trial would be scheduled to begin on May 12, 2014. Pemex-Exploration and Production has also filed additional civil claims before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas against Shell Chemical Co. and other companies that were not named in the original claim, generally asserting the same conversion based-claims brought in the initial action. On October 1, 2013, the District Court rejected a counterclaim filed by Murphy Energy Corporation; Trammo Petroleum Inc.; BIO-UN Southwest Inc.; Valley Fuels LTD;Corporation, one of the defendants, that sought damages of U.S. Petroleum Depot, Inc.; Continental Fuels Inc.; and High Sierra Crude Oil Marketing, L.P., as well as against several individuals who were charged in criminal investigations related to theft of natural gas condensate from the Burgos basin and its subsequent illegal sale. $40 million.

The purpose of this and subsequentthese claims is to prevent the illegal purchase and resale of our products in the United States and to recover damages caused by such activities in an amount up to the value of the stolen natural gas condensateproduct that it alleges was allegedly purchased and then resold by the defendants. Subsequently,In the course of these proceedings, Pemex-Exploration and Production identified other parties allegedly involved inreached out-of-court settlements with several of the illegal purchasedefendants. In February 2014, a number of defendants filed a motion seeking to dismiss certain of Pemex-Exploration and resaleProduction’s claims on the grounds that these claims had already been settled out of stolen petroleum products originating in Mexico. On May 29, 2011,court, thereby barring the right to further remedies. Pemex-Exploration and Production filed an additional civil claim before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas against Big Star Gathering LTD L.L.P.; F&M Transportation, Inc.; Joplin Energy, LLC, f/k/expects to file a Hutchison Hayes Energy, LLC; Plains All-American Pipeline, L.P.; SemCrude, L.P.; Saint James Oil, Inc.; Superior Crude Gathering Inc.; TransMontaigne Partners, L.P.; Western Refining Company, L.P; and two individuals. These claims were subsequently joined into one claim, which we refer to as the initial illegal sale claim. On January 27, 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed an amendmentresponse to this civil claim to include nine new defendants, including Shell Trading (US) Company (STUSCO), and also sought to add new claims for breach of contracts, breach of warranty of title and fraud, which it was able to assert after entering into agreements with AGE Refinery, Flint Hills Resources and Valero Marketing whereby these companies assigned to Pemex-Exploration and Production all of their claims related to their alleged purchase of stolen Mexican condensate. Pemex-Exploration and Production therefore sued individually and as an assignee. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled on April 10, 2012 that only three of the new defendants could be added, and that six of the new defendants, including STUSCO, as well as the assigned claims, could not be added to this civil claim. Pemex-Exploration and Production intends to designate its experts, who will file their testimony in support of the amount of damages sought in the initial illegal sale claim, no later than July 5, 2012. motion.

As of the date of this report, a final resolution is pending with respect to a number of these proceedings. The results of these proceedings are uncertain until their final resolutions are issued by the initial illegal sale claim remains in the evidentiary stage and it is expected that a jury will be selected in the first quarter of 2013.

As a result, on April 11, 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed a new civil claim, which we refer to as the subsequent illegal sale claim, before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas against twelve parties: STUSCO and Shell Chemical Co.; ConocoPhillips; Big Star Gathering LTD, L.L.P.; F&M Transportation, Inc.; Superior Crude Gathering Inc.; Murphy Energy Corporation; High Sierra Crude Oil & Marketing LLC; St. James Energy Operating Inc.; Plains Marketing L.P.; Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P.; FR Midstream Transport L.P.; and Marathon Petroleum Co. L.P. The subsequent illegal sale claim alleges largely the same conversion-based claims asserted in the initial illegal sale claim, as well as the assigned claims for breach of contracts, breach of warranty of title and fraud that it attempted to add in the initial illegal sale claim.appropriate authorities.

On October 25, 2011, amendments to theCódigo Penal Federal (Federal Criminal Code),Código Federal de Procedimientos Penales (Federal Code of Criminal Procedures) andLey Federal Contra la Delincuencia Organizada(Federal Law Against Organized Crime) to combat the illicit market in fuels became effective. These amendments, among other measures, provide for the criminal punishment of:

any person who illegally extracts and exploits crude oil, refined or processed hydrocarbons, or their derivatives, from pipelines, equipment or installations of PEMEX. Such acts will be considered organized crime;

any person who tampers with the pipelines, equipment or installations of PEMEX;

any person who tampers with the measurement instruments used to sell or supply refined or processed hydrocarbons or their derivatives or who sells or supplies gasoline, diesel or gas liquids, knowing that he or she is delivering an amount less than the amount invoiced; and

any person who possesses or safeguards stolen refined or processed hydrocarbons or their derivatives.

These amendments impose penalties for these crimes of up to twelve years in prison and fines of up to 12,000 times the daily minimum wage. A harsher penalty may be imposed if the person responsible is or has been a petroleum industry worker or a public official.

Civil Actions

In the ordinary course of our business, we are named ina party to a number of lawsuits of various types. We evaluate the merit of each claim and assess the likely outcome, accruing a contingent liability when an unfavorable decision is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. At December 31, 2011,2013, we had accrued a reserve of Ps. 8.417.6 billion for our contingent liabilities in connection with these lawsuits. Our material legal proceedings are described in Note 1723 to our audited financial statements included in this annual report, and that description is incorporated by reference under this Item.

Dividends

In March 1990, as a result of the implementation of the 1989-92 Financing Package for Mexico, our commercial bank creditors exchanged U.S. $7.58 billion of Petróleos Mexicanos’ external indebtedness for Brady Bonds issued by the Mexican Government. At the same time, Petróleos Mexicanos’ indebtedness to the Mexican Government was increased by the same amount; the new indebtedness was denominated in currencies other than pesos. In December 1990, the Mexican Government and Petróleos Mexicanos agreed to capitalize this indebtedness, converting it into Certificates of Contribution “A.” As a condition of this capitalization, Petróleos Mexicanos agreed to pay a minimum guaranteed dividend to the Mexican Government equal to the debt service on the capitalized debt. The Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos approved the total dividend on the Certificates of Contribution “A” after the end of each fiscal year, although until January 2007 Petróleos Mexicanos paid an amount equal to the minimum guaranteed dividend to the Mexican Government in monthly advance payments during the year. During 2006 and 2007, Petróleos Mexicanos made advance payments to the Mexican Government in aggregate annual amounts of Ps. 269 million and Ps. 4,260 million, respectively, toward the minimum guaranteed dividends for those years. On January 2, 2007, Petróleos Mexicanos made its final advance payment of minimum guaranteed dividends. We do not have a dividend policy; the Mexican Government may require that we make dividend payments at any time. On August 20, 2008, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos approved the payment of a Ps. 4,270 million dividend to the Mexican Government. No dividends were declared or paid in the years 2009 2010 or 2011.to 2013. See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Equity Structure and Certificates of Contribution ‘A.’”

Item 9.The Offer and Listing

Trading in the debt securities issued by Petróleos Mexicanos takes place primarily in the over-the-counter market. All the debt securities issued by Petróleos Mexicanos that are registered pursuant to the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (which we refer to as the Securities Act) are also listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and traded on the Euro MTF market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.

 

Item 10.Additional Information

Memorandum and Articles of Association

The Mexican Congress established Petróleos Mexicanos by a decree dated June 7, 1938, effective July 20, 1938. None of Petróleos Mexicanos or the subsidiary entities has bylaws or articles of association. On July 17, 1992, the Mexican Congress created the subsidiary entities out of operations that had previously been directly managed by Petróleos Mexicanos. Petróleos Mexicanos and its four subsidiary entities, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and Pemex-Petrochemicals, are decentralized public entities of the Mexican Government, and each is a legal entity empowered to own property and carry on business in its own name. The activities of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities are regulated by the PoliticalMexican Constitution, of the United Mexican States, the Regulatory Law, the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, Regulations to the Petróleos Mexicanos Law and other federal laws and regulations. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—History and Development.” Under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos has the following committees: Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee, Transparency and Accountability

Committee, Strategy and Investment Committee, Compensation Committee, Acquisitions, Leasing, Works and Services Committee, Environmental and Sustainability Committee and Development and Technological Research Committee. See “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

Under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law and the Regulations to the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, our directors are obligated to abstain from voting on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which they have a personal, family or business interest. Our directors do not have the power to vote compensation to themselves or any other member of the board. Except in the case of the professional board members, our directors do not receive compensation for their services as members of the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities. Under the Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Officials, our directors must perform their duties without obtaining or attempting to obtain any benefits greater than those granted by law. Therefore, our directors do not have borrowing powers exercisable by themselves. There is no requirement for early retirement for our directors.

Material Contracts

On November 10, 1998, Petróleos Mexicanos, The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York) and The Bank of New York (Delaware) entered into a Trust Agreement, which created the Master Trust and designated The Bank of New York Mellon as Managing Trustee and The Bank of New York (Delaware) as Delaware Trustee. On the same date, Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary entities (except forPemex-Petrochemicals) and the Master Trust, acting through The Bank of New York Mellon, entered into an Assignment and Indemnity Agreement. This agreement provided for the assignment by such subsidiary entities to the Master Trust of certain payment obligations relating to PIDIREGAS, the arrangement by Petróleos Mexicanos of financing on behalf of the Master Trust to meet such payment obligations, the payment by Petróleos Mexicanos and such subsidiary entities to the Master Trust of the amounts necessary to meet the Master Trust’s obligations under such financings and the indemnification of the Master Trust by Petróleos Mexicanos and such subsidiary entities. The Trust Agreement was amended on each of November 17, 2004, December 22, 2004 and August 17, 2006, and the Assignment and Indemnity Agreement was amended on August 17, 2006. The purpose of the August 17, 2006 amendment was to include Pemex-Petrochemicals asbecame a party to the Assignment and Indemnity Agreement. Effective January 30, 2009, the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 assigned certain rights to Petróleos Mexicanos in consideration of the cancellation of debt that

these entities had issued to Petróleos Mexicanos between 2006 and 2008Agreement pursuant to several inter-company private placements. In addition, effectivean amendment of this agreement on August 17, 2006. Effective January 1, 2009, in connection with amendments to the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability, Petróleos Mexicanos agreed to assume primary responsibility for the payment of all indebtedness of each of the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163, respectively. However,163. During the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 continued to act as servicerssecond half of all of this indebtedness until such time as2009, Petróleos Mexicanos legally assumed, as primary obligor, theirthe indebtedness of the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 under the related agreements. These assumptions occurred during the second half of 2009. On August 16, 2011, Fideicomiso F/163 was terminated, and on December 20, 2011, the Master Trust was terminated.

On December 30, 2004, the Master Trust and Petróleos Mexicanos entered into an indenture with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (Deutsche Bank), as Trustee. This agreement provided for the issuance by the Master Trust from time to time of unsecured debt securities. All issuances of debt securities under this indenture were unconditionally guaranteed by Petróleos Mexicanos. Pursuant to a guaranty agreement, dated as of July 29, 1996, Petróleos Mexicanos’ obligations are jointly and severally guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals. Under the indenture, Petróleos Mexicanos was permitted, without the consent of the holders of the outstanding debt securities, to assume as primary obligor all of the Master Trust’s obligations under such debt securities in substitution of the Master Trust and, upon such assumption, the Master Trust would be released from its obligations under such debt securities. Effective September 30, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos assumed all of the Master Trust’s obligations under the 2004 indenture and the debt securities issued under the 2004 indenture, and all of the Master Trust’s obligations under an indenture dated as of July 31, 2000, among the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank, as well as the debt securities issued under the 2000 indenture.

On each of February 11, 2005, February 23, 2007, October 11, 2007 and July 18, 2008, the Master Trust further increased the aggregate amount of debt securities issuable under its Medium-Term Notes program to U.S. $20,000,000,000, U.S. $30,000,000,000, U.S. $40,000,000,000 and U.S. $60,000,000,000, respectively. Following these increases and pursuant to the 2004 indenture referred to above, the Master Trust issued various

new series of securities. See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financing Activities.” All of the Master Trust’s obligations under these securities were assumed by Petróleos Mexicanos effective as of September 30, 2009.

As of December 31, 20102012 and 2011,2013, we have entered into contracts with various contractors for approximate amounts of Ps. 421,101470,233 million and Ps. 350,248Ps 630,776 million, respectively. These contracts are for the development of investment projects. See Note 16(f)22 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.

On January 27, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into an indenture with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee. This agreement provides for the issuance by Petróleos Mexicanos from time to time of unsecured debt securities. On the same date, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a distribution agreement with Calyon Securities (USA) Inc. (now known as Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc.), Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Limited, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. and Santander Investment Securities Inc. pursuant to which Petróleos Mexicanos established a U.S. $7 billion medium-term note, Series C, program. Pursuant to the 1996 guaranty agreement referred to above, Petróleos Mexicanos’ obligations under all notes issued under this program are jointly and severally guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals. Petróleos Mexicanos issued approximately U.S. $6.1 billion of notes under this program in 2009. In January 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos increased the size of this program to U.S. $12 billion, and in December 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos increased the size of this program to U.S. $22 billion and appointed Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as an agent under the 2009 distribution agreement referred to above. In each of December 2010 and January 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued approximately U.S. $5.1 billionincreased the size of notes and bonds under this program in 2010.to U.S. $12 billion and U.S. $22 billion, respectively. Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $3.5 billion of notes and bonds under this program in 2011.

In 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $5.3 billion of notes and bonds under this program. In 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos increased the size of this program to U.S. $32 billion and issued U.S. $6.9 billion of notes and bonds under it. During the first four months of 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos increased the size of this program to U.S. $42 billion and issued U.S. $4.0 billion and €1.0 billion of notes and bonds under it. See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financing Activities.”

Exchange Controls

Mexico has had a free market for foreign exchange since 1991, and the Mexican Government has allowed the peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar since December 1994. PEMEX hasWe have no control over or influence on this exchange rate policy. The Mexican Government has announced that it does not intend to change its floating exchange rate policy, but there is no guarantee that the Mexican Government will not change this policy. See “Item 3—Key Information—Exchange Rates” and “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Considerations Related to Mexico.”

Taxation

The 1997 Securities, the 1998 Securities, the 1999 Securities, the 2003 Securities, the 2004 Securities, the 2006 Securities, the 2008 Securities, the 2009 Securities, the 2010 Securities, the 2011 Securities, the 2012 Securities and the 20112013 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-7796), which was declared effective by the SEC on October 17, 1997, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $400,000,000 of 9.50% Global Guaranteed Bonds due 2027, which we refer to as the 1997 Securities. In December 2004 and February 2006, an aggregate amount of U.S. $376,250,000 of the 1997 Securities were exchanged for bonds issued by the Master Trust.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-9310), which was declared effective by the SEC on August 24, 1998, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $350,000,000 of 9 1/4% Global Guaranteed Bonds due 2018, which we refer to as the 1998 Securities. In December 2004 and February 2006, an aggregate amount of U.S. $340,427,000 of the 1998 Securities were exchanged for bonds issued by the Master Trust.

Pursuant to a registration statement on FormF-4 (File No. 333-10706), which was declared effective by the SEC on October 1, 1999, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $500,000,000 of 9.50% Puttable or Mandatorily Exchangeable Securities (POMESSM) due 2027, which we refer to as the 1999 Securities. In December 2004 and February 2006, an aggregate amount of U.S. $421,522,000 of the 1999 Securities were exchanged for POMESSM issued by the Master Trust. All outstanding 1999 Securities of Petróleos Mexicanos were, on March 16, 2006, mandatorily exchanged for 9.50% Global Guaranteed Bonds due 2027 issued by Petróleos Mexicanos, thereby increasing the outstanding amount of the 1997 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-103197), which was declared effective by the SEC on February 24, 2003, the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $500,000,000 of 8.625% Bonds due 2022 and up to U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 7.375% Notes due 2014. Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-107905), which was declared effective by the SEC on August 21, 2003, the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $510,154,000 of 8.625% Bonds due 2022 and up to U.S. $757,265,000 of 7.375% Notes due 2014. We refer to the securities registered in 2003 under these registration statements as the 2003 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-118373), which was declared effective by the SEC on August 31, 2004, the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $18,095,000 of 7.375% Notes due 2014 and up to U.S. $47,085,000 of 8.625% Bonds due 2022. We refer to the securities registered in 2004 as the 2004 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-126941), which was declared effective by the SEC on January 13, 2006, the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $324,220,000 of 9 1/4% Bonds due 2018, U.S. $228,735,000 of 8.625% Bonds due 2023, U.S. $354,477,000 of 9.50% Bonds due 2027, U.S. $403,746,000 of POMESSM due 2027, U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 5.75% Notes due 2015 and U.S. $500,000,000 of 6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2035. Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-126948), which was declared effective by the SEC on January 13, 2006, the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $25,780,000 of 9 1/4% Bonds due 2018, U.S. $21,265,000 of 8.625% Bonds due 2023, U.S. $45,523,000 of 9.50% Bonds due 2027 and U.S. $96,254,000 of POMESSM due 2027. All outstanding POMES registered under these registration statements were, on March 15, 2006, mandatorily exchanged for 9.50% Bonds due 2027. Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-136674), which was declared effective by the SEC on November 3, 2006, the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $759,254,000 of 5.75% Notes due 2015 and U.S. $751,995,000 of 6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2035. We refer to the securities registered in 2006 under these registration statements as the 2006 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-152486), which was declared effective by the SEC on December 18, 2008, the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $2,500,000,000 of 5.75% Guaranteed Notes due 2018, up to U.S. $501,000,000 of 6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2035 and up to U.S. $500,000,000 of 6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2038. We refer to the securities registered in 2008 as the 2008 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-160799), which was declared effective by the SEC on August 25, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $2,000,000,000 of 8.00% Notes due 2019. We refer to the securities registered in 2009 as the 2009 Securities.

Effective as of September 30, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos assumed, as primary obligor, all of the Master Trust’s obligations as issuer of the 2001 Securities, the 2003 Securities, the 2004 Securities, the 2006 Securities and the 2008 Securities. As a result, effective as of September 30, 2009, Petróleos Mexicanos is the issuer of all Registered Securities (as defined below).

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-168326), which was declared effective by the SEC on August 31, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $63,314,000 of 8.00% Notes due 2019, up to U.S. $1,500,000,000 of 4.875% Notes due 2015, up to U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 6.000% Notes due 2020, up to U.S. $2,000,000,000 of 5.50% Notes due 2021 and up to U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 6.625% Bonds due 2035. We refer to the securities registered in 2010 as the 2010 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-175821), which was declared effective by the SEC on August 31, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 5.50% Notes due 2021 and up to U.S. $1,250,000,000 of 6.500% Bonds due 2041. We refer to the securities registered in 2011 as the 2011 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-182553), which was declared effective by the SEC on July 23, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos,Pemex-Exploration and Production,Pemex-Refining andPemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $2,100,000,000 of 4.875% Notes due 2022 and up to U.S. $1,750,000,000 of 5.500% Bonds due 2044. We refer to the securities registered in 2012 as the 2012 Securities.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4/A (File No. 333-189852), which was declared effective by the SEC on July 25, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos,Pemex-Exploration and Production,Pemex-Refining andPemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals registered pursuant to the Securities Act up to U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 3.500% Notes due 2018, up to U.S. $500,000,000 of Floating Rate Notes due 2018, up to U.S. $2,100,000,000 of 3.500% Notes due 2023, up to U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 4.875% Notes due 2024, up to U.S. $500,000,000 of 6.500% Bonds due 2041 and up to U.S. $1,000,000,000 of 5.50% Bonds due 2044. We refer to the securities registered in 2013 as the 2013 Securities, and together with the 1997 Securities, the 1998 Securities, the 2003 Securities, the 2004 Securities, the 2006 Securities, the 2008 Securities, the 2009 Securities, the 2010 Securities, the 2011 Securities and the 20102012 Securities, as the Registered Securities.

Taxation Generally

The following summary contains a description of the principal Mexican and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of the Registered Securities, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to invest in, or dispose of, the Registered Securities.

This summary is based on the federal tax laws of Mexico and the United States in force on the date of this Form 20-F, including the provisions of the income tax treaty between the United States and Mexico together with related protocols (which are subject to change), and does not describe any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state or municipality in Mexico, the United States or any other jurisdiction, or the laws of any taxing jurisdiction other than the federal laws of Mexico and the United States.

Mexico has also entered into, or is negotiating, tax treaties with various countries that may have effects on holders of Registered Securities. This report does not discuss the consequences (if any) of such treaties.

Each holder or beneficial owner of Registered Securities should consult its tax advisor as to the Mexican, United States or other tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of those securities, including the effect of any foreign, state or municipal tax laws, and the consequences of the application of any tax treaty to which Mexico is a party.

Mexican Taxation

This summary of certain Mexican federal tax considerations refers only to holders of Registered Securities that are not residents of Mexico for Mexican tax purposes and that will not hold the Registered Securities or a beneficial interest therein through a permanent establishment for tax purposes (we refer to any such non-resident holder as a Foreign Holder). For purposes of Mexican taxation, an individual is a resident of Mexico if he/she has established his/her domicile in Mexico. When an individual also has a place of residence in another country, that individual will be considered a resident of Mexico for tax purposes, if such individual has his/her center of vital interest in Mexico. An individual would be deemed to have his/her center of vital interest in Mexico if, among other things: (a) more than 50% of his/her total income for the year were derived from Mexican sources, or (b) his/her principal center of professional activities were located in Mexico.

A legal entity is a resident of Mexico if:

 

it maintains the principal administration of its business in Mexico; or

 

it has established its effective management in Mexico.

A Mexican national is presumed to be a resident of Mexico unless such person can demonstrate the contrary. If a legal entity or individual has a permanent establishment in Mexico, such permanent establishment shall be required to pay taxes in Mexico on income attributable to such permanent establishment in accordance with Mexican federal tax law.

Taxation of Interest. Under the Mexican Income Tax Law and rules issued by the SHCP applicable to PEMEX, payments of interest (which isare deemed to include any amounts paid in excess of the original issue price of the relevant securities), made by a Mexican issuer (including Petróleos Mexicanos) in respect of notes or bonds and other debt securities to a Foreign Holder will generally be subject to a Mexican withholding tax assessed at a rate of 4.9%, if the following requirements are met:

 

notice relating to the offering of such notes or bonds is given to the CNBV as required under the Securities Market Law and evidence of such notice is timely filed with the SHCP;

 

such notes or bonds are placed outside of Mexico through banks or brokerage houses in a country that has entered intois party to a treaty to avoid double taxation with Mexico; and

 

the issuer duly complies with the information requirements established in the general rules issued by the SHCP for such purposes.

If the effective beneficiaries, directly or indirectly, individually or jointly with related parties, receive more than 5% of the interest paid on such notes or bonds and are holders, directly or indirectly, individually or jointly, with related parties of more than 10% of the voting stock of the issuer or entities 20% or more of whose stock is owned directly or indirectly, individually or jointly, by parties related to the issuer, the withholding tax rate applicable to payment of interest on such notes or bonds may be significantly higher.

Payments of interest made by Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining or Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals in respect of the Registered Securities to non-Mexican pension or retirement funds will be exempt from Mexican withholding taxes, provided that:

 

such fund is duly organized pursuant to the laws of its country of origin and is the effective beneficiary of the interest payment;

the income from such interest payment is exempt from income tax in suchits country of residence; and

 

such fund is registered withdelivers certain information as per rules issued by the SHCP for that purpose.

SHCP.

Additional Amounts. Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals have agreed, subject to specified exceptions and limitations, to:

 

pay Additional Amounts (as defined in the indenture dated as of September 18, 1997, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank) to the holders of the 1997 Securities in respect of the Mexican withholding taxes mentioned above;

 

pay Additional Amounts (as defined in the indenture dated as of August 7, 1998, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank) to the holders of the 1998 Securities in respect of the Mexican withholding taxes mentioned above;

 

pay Additional Amounts (as defined in the indenture dated as of July 31, 2000, as supplemented, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank) to the holders of the 2003 Securities and the 2004 Securities in respect of the Mexican withholding taxes described above;

 

pay Additional Amounts (as defined in the indenture dated as of December 30, 2004, as supplemented, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank) to the holders of the 2006 Securities and the 2008 Securities in respect of the Mexican withholding taxes described above; and

 

pay Additional Amounts (as defined in the indenture dated as of January 27, 2009, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank) to the holders of the 2009 Securities, the 2010 Securities, the 2011 Securities, the 2012 Securities and the 20112013 Securities in respect of the Mexican withholding taxes described above.

If Petróleos Mexicanos pays Additional Amounts in respect of such Mexican withholding taxes, any refunds received with respect to such Additional Amounts will be for the account of Petróleos Mexicanos.

Holders or beneficial owners of the Registered Securities may be requestedrequired to provide certain information or documentation necessary to enable Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining or Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals to establishapply the appropriate Mexican withholding tax rate applicable to such holders or beneficial owners.owners of the Registered Securities. In the event that the specified information or documentation concerning such holder or beneficial owner, if requested, is not provided on a timely basis, the obligation of Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining or Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals to pay Additional Amounts may be limited.

Taxation of Dispositions. Capital gains resulting from the sale or other disposition of the Registered Securities by a Foreign Holder will not be subject to Mexican income or withholding taxes.

Other Mexican Tax Considerations. Under the Income Tax Law, any discount received by a non-resident upon purchase of the notes or bonds from a Mexican resident or a non-resident with a permanent establishment in

Mexico is deemed interest income, and therefore, subject to taxes in Mexico. Such interest income results from the difference between the face value (plus accrued interest not subject to withholding) and the purchase price of such notes or bonds.

Transfer and Other Taxes. There are no Mexican stamp, registration or similar taxes payable by a Foreign Holder in connection with the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Registered Securities. A Foreign Holder of the Registered Securities will not be liable for Mexican estate, succession, gift, inheritance or similar tax with respect to such securities.

United States Taxation

This summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations deals principally with persons that hold the Registered Securities as capital assets and whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar. As used in this section “Taxation,” the term “United States Holder” means an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a U.S. domestic corporation or any other person that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis in respect of its investment in the Registered Securities.

This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to any particular investor, including tax considerations that arise from rules of general application or that are assumed to be known to investors. This summary generally does not address the tax treatment of holders that may be subject to special tax rules, such as banks, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or currencies, certain short-term holders of Registered Securities, traders in securities electing to mark-to-market, or persons that hedge their exposure in the Registered Securities or hold the Registered Securities as a position in a “straddle” for tax purposes or as part of a “synthetic security” or a “conversion transaction”“hedging” or “conversion” transaction or other integrated investment comprised of such securities and one or more other investments, nor does it address the tax treatment of holders that did not acquire the Registered Securities at their issue price as part of the initial distribution. Investors who purchased the Registered Securities at a price other than the issue price should consult their tax advisor as to the possible applicability to them of the amortizable bond premium or market discount rules. United States Holders should be aware that the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding the Registered Securities may be materially different for investors described in the prior sentence, including as a result of recent changes in law applicable to investors with short holding periods or that engage in hedging transactions.

Taxation of Interest and Additional Amounts. A United States Holder will treat the gross amount of interest and Additional Amounts (i.e.(i.e., without reduction for Mexican withholding taxes) as ordinary interest income in respect of the Registered Securities. Mexican withholding taxes paid at the appropriate rate applicable to the United States Holder will be treated as foreign income taxes eligible, subject to generally applicable limitations and conditions, for credit against such United States Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, at the election of such United States Holder, or for deduction in computing such United States Holder’s taxable income, provided that the United States Holder does not elect to claim a foreign tax credit for any foreign income taxes paid or accrued for the relevant taxable year. Interest and Additional Amounts will constitute income from sources without the United States and generally will be treated separately along with other items of “passive” income for purposes of determining the credit for foreign income taxes allowed under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The calculation and availability of foreign tax credits or deductions involves the application of rules that depend on a United States Holder’s particular circumstances. United States Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits and the treatment of Additional Amounts.

Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in securities or in respect of arrangements in which a United States Holder’s expected economic profits is insubstantial. United States Holders should consult their own advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Dispositions. Upon the sale, exchange or retirement of a Registered Security, a United States Holder will generally recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized (less any amounts attributable to accrued and unpaid interest not previously includible in gross income, which will be taxable as ordinary income) and the holder’s tax basis in such security. Gain or loss recognized by a United States Holder on the sale, redemption or other disposition of the Registered Securities generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of disposition, the securities have been held for more than one year. Long-term capital gain realized by an individual United States Holder is generally taxed at lower rates than short-term capital gains or ordinary income.

Non-United States Holders. Holders of the Registered Securities that are, with respect to the United States, non-resident aliens or foreign corporations (which we refer to as Non-United States Holders) will not be subject

to U.S. federal income taxes, including withholding taxes, on payments of interest on the securities so long as the requirements described under “Backup Withholding and Information Reporting” are satisfied, unless such income is effectively connected with the conduct by the Non-United States Holder of a trade or business in the United States.

The gain realized on any sale or exchange of the Registered Securities by a Non-United States Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including withholding tax, unless (1) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the holder of a trade or business in the United States or (2) in the case of gain realized by an individual holder, the holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and either (A) such gain or income is attributable to an office or other fixed place of business maintained in the United States by such holder or (B) such holder has a tax home in the United States.

A Registered Security held by an individual holder who at the time of death is a non-resident alien will not be subject to U.S. federal estate tax.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. The principal paying agent for each of the Registered Securities will be required to file information returns with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to payments made to certain United States Holders of those securities. In addition, certain United States Holders may be subject to a backup withholding tax in respect of such payments, unless they (1) provide their accurate taxpayer identification numbers to the principal paying agent and certify that they are not subject to backup withholding or (2) otherwise establish an exemption from the backup withholding tax. Non-United States Holders may be required to comply with applicable certification procedures to establish that they are not United States Holders in order to avoid the application of such information reporting requirements and backup withholding tax.

Documents on Display

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the SEC. These materials, including this annual report, and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. In addition, any filings we make electronically with the SEC will be available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.

Item 11.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk

Risk Management and Financial Instruments

PEMEX facesWe face market risksrisk caused by the volatility of hydrocarbon prices, exchange rates and interest rates.rates, credit risk associated with investments and financial derivatives. In order to monitor and manage these risks, Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities have developed regulationsapproved general provisions relating to marketfinancial risk management, which are comprised of policies and guidelines applicable to Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities that promote an integrated schemeframework for market risk management, regulate the use of DFIs and guide the development of hedging strategies and provide strategies for the formulation of risk limits.mitigation strategies.

Risk management regulations of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities establishThis regulatory framework establishes that DFIs should generally be used only for the purpose of hedging.mitigating financial risk. The use of DFIs for any other purpose must be approved in accordance with PEMEX’sour internal procedures.regulation.

One of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities have a policy of reducingentities’ policies is to help minimize the impact of marketthat unfavorable changes in financial risk factors have on theirits financial results by promoting aan adequate balance between expected incoming cash flows from operations and outgoing cash flows relating to theirits liabilities.

Finally,In addition, the PMI Group has implemented a regulatory framework for risk management with respect to its activities, which consists of policies, guidelines and procedures and instructions to ensuremanage the realization of essentialmarket risk controls,associated with its commodity trading activities, in accordance with industry best practices, such as: the use of DFIs for financial risk mitigation purposes exclusively; the segregation of duties; valuation and monitoring mechanisms, such as the generation of a periodicdaily portfolio risk report, forvalue at risk takers(VaR) computation and management.regular stress testing of major exposures; and VaR limits, both at a global and business unit level and the implementation of stop loss mechanisms. In addition, the PMI Group also has its own risk management subcommittee which supervises the trading of DFIs. Notwithstanding their execution for hedging purposes, commodity DFIs were not recorded as hedges for accounting purposes. See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements incorporated in Item 18.

Hydrocarbon PriceMarket Risk

Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entities periodically evaluate their exposure to international hydrocarbon prices and use DFIs as a mechanism to mitigate identified potential sources of risk.

Since 2003, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemical’s domestic sales of LPG have been subject to price controls imposed by the Mexican Government. These price controls scheme fix the sale price of LPG throughout Mexico. This generates a risk exposure in the geographic areas where PEMEX sells imported LPG. During 2009, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals mitigated the market risk generated by this exposure by employing a hedging strategy consisting of propane swaps, since propane is the primary component of LPG. During 2010 and 2011, we did not enter into any DFIs to mitigate risks associated with the purchase and sale of LPG. We reexamine our price risk exposure periodically in order to determine the optimal strategy to be implemented for a specific period of time.

P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. periodically enters into DFIs to mitigate risk generated in the purchase and sale of refined products and liquid gas, thereby reducing the potential volatility of its income. P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. policies establish an upper limit for capital at risk, which is compared on a daily basis with the value-at-risk portfolio in order to carry out risk mitigation mechanisms if necessary.

We did not hedge the price risk associated with any of our crude oil production for the years 2007 to 2011.

Exchange Rate and Interest Rate Risks

Exchange Rate Risk

A significant amount of our revenues is derived from exports of crude oil and petroleum products, which are priced and payable in U.S. dollars. Moreover, our revenues from domestic sales of gasoline and diesel net of the IEPS tax, frompetrochemicals and natural gas and its byproducts are related to international U.S. dollar-denominated prices, except for domestic sales of petroleum productsLPG, which are priced in pesos and petrochemicals arerepresent less than 5% of our revenues. Our expenses related to the international dollar-denominated prices of these products. By contrast, most of our costs of sales and other expenses, other than hydrocarbon duties investment expendituresare indexed to international U.S. dollar-denominated prices, and the cost of petroleum products and natural gashydrocarbon imports that we importacquire for resale in Mexico or use in our facilities is determined in U.S. dollars. By contrast, our capital expenditure and operating expenses are

determined in pesos.

payable in pesos and are not linked to the U.S. dollar. As a result of this cash flow structure, the depreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar increases our incomefinancial balance in peso terms. AppreciationThe appreciation of the peso relative to the U.S. dollar has the opposite effect. We perceive this risk as manageable, without the need for hedging instruments, because most of our investments and debt issuances are made in U.S. dollars and therefore, the impact on our revenues of the fluctuationfluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the peso on our revenues is offset in whole or in part by its impact on our obligations.

Cross-Currency Swaps

Most of our debt is denominated in U.S. dollars or pesos. Although PEMEX attemptswe seek to issue debt either in U.S. dollars or pesos, this is not always achievable. Therefore,As a consequence of the cash flow structure described above, fluctuations in non-dollarnon-U.S. dollar currencies (other than pesos) canmay increase our costscost of funding or expose usdue to the exposure to foreign exchange risk. For

Since 1991, for non-U.S. dollar andor peso issuances, since 1991, PEMEX has,we have, as a risk mitigation strategy, swappedused DFIs to swap this debt into U.S. dollars, except fordollars. In order to hedge inflation risk associated with debt denominated in UDIs, which we swap this debt into pesos. As a result of this strategy, PEMEX holdswe hold a debt portfolio with negligible sensitivity to currenciescurrency risk other than pesos and U.S. dollars.

In 2010,The currencies underlying these DFIs are the euro, Swiss franc, Japanese yen, pound sterling and Australian dollar, which are each swapped against the U.S. dollar. UDIs are swapped against the peso.

During 2013, we entered into cross-currency swaps to hedge currency risk arising from debt obligations denominated in euros and inflation risk arising from debt denominated in UDIs, for an aggregate notional amount of U.S. $2,028.7 million. During 2012, we entered into various cross-currency swaps to hedge currency risk arising from debt obligations denominated in UDIsSwiss francs and Swiss francsAustralian dollars for an aggregate notional amount of U.S. $426.2 million. In 2011, we entered into various cross-currency swaps to hedge currency risk arising from debt obligations denominated in UDIs for an aggregate notional amount of U.S. $214.4 million.

In March 2012, we entered into three cross-currency swaps to hedge currency risk arising from debt obligations denominated in Swiss francs, for an aggregate notional amount of U.S. $328.6$484.0 million.

Most of our cross-currency swaps are straightforward, with no unusual terms,plain vanilla, except for two swaps entered into in 2002 and 2004 to hedge our exposure to Japanese yen and euros, with termination dates in 2023 and 2016, respectively. These swaps are referred to as “extinguishing swaps” and were obtained in order to be able to hedge long-term obligations. The main characteristic of extinguishing swaps is that PEMEX’s counterparty has a right tothese DFIs terminate the DFI upon the occurrence of any of the credit default events specified in the DFI contract confirmation, without any payment obligation by either party. These swaps have a notional amount of U.S. $241.4 million and U.S. $1,028.5 million, respectively.

We recorded a total net foreign exchange gain in the comprehensive financing cost itemloss of Ps. 14,6853,951.5 million in 2009 and2013, as compared to a total net foreign exchange gain in this item of Ps. 20,16744,845.7 million in 2010. Our foreign exchange gains in 20092012 and 2010 were due to the effect of the appreciation of the peso in each of those years on the value in pesos of our U.S. dollar-denominated debt. In 2011, we recorded a total net foreign exchange loss of Ps. 58,80160,143.3 million in comprehensive financing result, as a result of2011. Our foreign exchange loss in 2013 was due to the significant depreciation of the peso, from Ps. 13.0101 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2012 to Ps. 13.0765 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2013. The depreciation of the peso caused a total net foreign exchange loss because a significant part of our debt (75.0% as of December 31, 2013) is denominated in foreign currency. Our foreign exchange gain in 2012 was due to the effect of a 7.5% appreciation of the peso (from Ps. 13.9904 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2011 to Ps. 13.0101 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2012). Our foreign exchange loss in 2011 as comparedwas due to 2010,the depreciation of the peso, from Ps. 12.3571 = U.S. $1.00 on January 1, 2011 to Ps. 13.9904 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2011.

The PMI Group also faces market risks generated by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. In order to mitigate these risks, the board of directors of several of the companies that form the PMI Group have authorized a policy which resultedstipulates that no more than 5% of a company’s total financial assets may be denominated in an increasea currency other than its functional currency, unless the company owes a duty or expected payment in a currency other than its functional one. This policy further states that the exchange rate risk generated by financing contracts denominated in currencies other than the functional one is to be fully covered immediately upon the execution of the contract. Accordingly, the companies in the peso valuePMI Group will from time to time enter into DFIs in order to mitigate the risk associated with financing operations denominated in currencies other than a company’s functional currency.

PMI HBV has outstanding euro-dollar exchange rate forwards which were executed in order to hedge its financing operations denominated in euros. As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding notional amount of these contracts was €266.4 million.

Finally, a significant amount of PMI Trading’s income and expenses, including the cost of sales and related sales costs, is derived from the trade of refined products, petrochemicals and gas liquids to our subsidiaries and third parties, whose prices are determined and are payable in U.S. dollar-denominated debt.dollars. PMI Trading’s exposure to foreign currency risk results primarily from the need to fund tax payments denominated in domestic currency and secondarily from the need to purchase products in domestic currency for sale in U.S. dollars in the international market, as well as certain related sales costs denominated in domestic currency.

PMI Trading believes it can adequately manage the risk created by the payment of taxes in domestic currency without the need to enter into hedging instruments because the exposure to this risk is marginal relative to the total flows of U.S. dollar. In addition, in the event that a potential foreign exchange risk arises in connection with a commercial transaction, PMI Trading may implement risk mitigation measures by entering into DFIs.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to fluctuations in floating interest rates on short- and long-term floating rate instruments.liabilities. We are predominantly exposed to U.S. dollar LIBOR interest rates and to the Mexican InterbankpesoTasa de Interés Interbancaria de Equilibrio (Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate, (TIIE). Through our issuanceswhich we have soughtrefer to achieve a desired mix of fixed and floating rate instruments in our debt portfolio.as TIIE). As of December 31, 2011,2013, approximately 40.1%24.8% of our total net debt outstanding consisted of floating rate debt. On occasion,Moreover, we make investments in pesos and U.S. dollars in compliance with applicable internal regulations, through portfolios that have different purposes that seek an adequate return subject to followrisk parameters that reduce the strategyprobability of offsettingcapital losses. The objective of the investments made through these portfolios is to meet our obligations payable in pesos and U.S. dollars.

The investments made through our portfolios are exposed to domestic and international interest rate risk and credit spread risk derived from government and corporate securities, and inflation risk arising from the relationship between UDIs and pesos. However, these risks are mitigated by established limits on exposure to market risk

Interest Rate Swaps

Occasionally, for strategic reasons or in order to offset the expected inflows and outflows, we have entered into interest rate swaps as described below.

Interest Rate Swaps

swaps. Under ourits interest rate swap agreements, we are obligatedacquire the obligation to make payments based on a fixed interest rate and are entitled to receive floating interest rate payments based on the LIBOR, TIIE or a rate referenced to or calculated from the TIIE.

As of December 31, 2011,2013, we were a party to an interest rate swap agreements denominated in pesos for a notional amount equivalent to U.S. $621.9 million, an average fixed interest rate of approximately 11.43% and a weighted average term of approximately 1.1 years, and to interest rate swapsagreement denominated in U.S. dollars for a notional amount of U.S. $37.2$750.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.38% and a term of 10.13 years. The market value of Petróleos Mexicanos’ cross-currency swaps and interest rate swaps was Ps. 2,863.8 million as of December 31, 2012 and Ps. 285.3 million as of December 31, 2013. See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements incorporated in Item 18.

Similarly, in order to eliminate the volatility associated with variable interest rates of long-term financing operations, PMI NASA has executed interest rate swap agreements denominated in U.S. dollars for an outstanding notional amount of U.S. $127.9 million, at a weighted average fixed interest rate of approximately 5.28%4.16% and a weighted average term of approximately 9.48.4 years.

Hydrocarbon Price Risk

The cross-currencyWe periodically assess our revenues and interest rate swaps described aboveexpenditures structure in order to identify the main market risk factors that our cash flows are entered intoexposed to hedge financial risk related to PEMEX’s operations, mainly liabilities. Notwithstanding their purpose, these transactions do not qualify for accounting purposes as hedges and are recorded in our financial statements as entered into for trading purposes, despite the fact that the profits or losses arising from these DFIs are generally offset by profits or losses from the positions to which they relate.

The market value of our foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives position was Ps. 7,004.3 million as of December 31, 2010 and Ps. 4,107.7 million as of December 31, 2011.

Credit Risk

When the fair value of DFIs is favorable to PEMEX, we face the risk that counterparties will not be able to meet their obligations. To reduceconnection with international hydrocarbon prices. Based on this risk,assessment, we monitor our counterparties’ creditworthiness and credit exposure risk in our DFIs. Additionally, we enter into DFIs mostly with major financial institutions and maintain a diversified portfolio. Moreover, we have entered into various long-term cross-currency swaps agreements with “recouponing” provisions (pursuant to which the payments on the swaps are repriced when the credit exposure of one party to the other exceeds the relevant threshold specified in the swap), thereby limiting PEMEX’s exposure with its counterparties to a specific threshold amount. During 2010 and 2011, the specified thresholds were reached in seven and four cross-currency swaps used to hedge exposure to the euromost significant risk factors and pound sterling.quantify their impact on our financial balance.

We continuously evaluate the implementation of risk mitigation strategies, including those involving the use of DFIs, while taking into account operational and economic constraints. We did not hedge the price risk associated with any of our crude oil production for the period from 2007 to 2013.

In addition to supplying natural gas, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals offers DFIs to its domestic customers in order to provide them with support to mitigate the risk associated with the volatility of natural gas

prices. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals enters into DFIs with MGI Supply, Ltd. under the opposite position to those DFIs offered to its customers in order to mitigate the market risk it bears under such offered DFIs. MGI Supply, Ltd. then transfers the related price risk derived from the DFI position held with Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals to international financial counterparties by entering into these opposite position DFIs with such parties. Through the above mechanism, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals is able to maintain its natural risk profile with negligible exposure to market risk.

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ domestic sales of LPG have been subject to a price control mechanism imposed by the Mexican Government. This resultedmechanism generates a risk exposure in the cash settlementgeographic areas where we sell imported LPG. During 2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals mitigated the market risk generated by this exposure by executing a hedging strategy consisting of suchpropane swaps, since propane is the primary component of LPG. However, from July to December 2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals mitigated the resettingmarket risk of swap50% of the volume of LPG sold domestically through propane swaps. During 2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals did not enter into any DFIs of this type.

PMI Trading faces market risk generated by the terms of the purchase and sale of refined products and natural gas liquids, as well as the volatility of oil prices. Accordingly, it frequently enters into DFIs in order to return their mark-to-market valuemitigate this risk, thereby reducing the volatility of its financial results.

Risks Relating to zero.the Portfolio of Third-Party Shares

Instruments Entered into for Trading Purposes

Petróleos Mexicanos retainsWe hold a synthetic long position on 58,679,79967,969,767 shares of Repsol, YPF, with the objective of maintaining corporate rights over these shares. This is accomplished by using fourthree total return swaps under which Petróleos Mexicanos payswe pay variable amounts and receives total return on the Repsol shares. Under these DFIs, we are entitled to any capital gains associated with the Repsol shares and agree to cover our counterparties for any capital losses relating to those shares in reference to an exercise price, as well as to make payments at a floating interest rate.

These DFIs will mature between March and October of 2014. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the market value of Repsol shares was €18.320 and €15.335 per share, respectively.

Between July and September 2011, we acquired 57,204,240 shares of Repsol YPF through our affiliate P.M.I. Holdings, B.V.PMI HBV. In order to protect that investment, P.M.I. Holdings, B.V.PMI HBV entered into a structured product consisting of long put, short call and long call options maturing in 2012, 2013 and 2014. The exchange rate exposure associated with its financing of the shares was hedged with euro-dollar exchange rate forwards maturing in 2012, 2013 and 2014. The exchange rate forwards that matured in 2012 and 2013 correspond to 38,136,160 shares; hence, DFIs related to 19,068,080 shares remain outstanding. Notwithstanding their execution for hedging purposes, these DFIs were not recorded as hedges for accounting purposes.

Pemex-GasCredit Risk

When the fair value of DFIs is favorable to us, we face the risk that counterparties will not be able to meet their obligations. To reduce this risk, we monitor our counterparties’ creditworthiness and Basic Petrochemicals offerscalculate the credit risk exposure for our DFIs. In addition, we enter into DFIs mostly with major financial institutions with a minimum credit rating of BBB-. These ratings are issued and revised periodically by risk rating agencies. Furthermore, we maintain a diversified portfolio of counterparties.

Moreover, we have entered into various long-term cross-currency swaps agreements with “recouponing” provisions (pursuant to which the payments on the swaps are adjusted when the mark-to-market value exceeds the relevant threshold specified in the swap), thereby limiting our exposure with our counterparties to a specific threshold amount. The specified thresholds were reached in seven cross-currency swaps during 2012 and four cross-currency swaps during 2013. These swaps were used to hedge the exchange rate exposure to the euro and pound. This resulted in the cash settlement of such swaps and the resetting of swap terms to return their mark-to-market value to zero.

According to IFRS 13, “Fair Value Measurement,” the fair value or mark-to-market value of DFIs must reflect the creditworthiness of the parties. Consequently, the fair value of a DFI takes into account the risk that either party may default on its domestic customersobligation. In accordance with market best practices, we apply the credit value adjustment (CVA) method to help them mitigatecalculate the fair value of our DFIs.

PMI Trading’s credit risk associated with natural gas prices. DFI transactions is mitigated through the use of futures and standardized instruments that are cleared through CME-Clearport.

PMI HBV’s credit risk associated with DFI transactions is related to the financing that it obtains from the same DFI counterparties. PMI HBV’s debt balance with such counterparties is greater than the DFIs’ mark-to-market value.

Liquidity Risk

Through its subsidiary, MGI Supply Ltd., Pemex-Gasour debt planning and Basic Petrochemicals enters into DFIs with the position opposite those DFIs it offersU.S. dollar selling operations, we currently preserve a cash balance at a level of liquidity in domestic currency and U.S. dollars that we believe is considered adequate to its customers,cover our investment and operating expenses, as well as other payment obligations.

In addition, we have acquired three committed revolving credit lines in order to cancel outmitigate liquidity risk, one of which provides access to Ps. 10,000,000,000 with an expiration date of December 2015, and two others that each provides access to U.S. $1,250,000,000 with expiration dates in December 2016 and October 2017, respectively.

Finally, the market risk it bears under such offered DFIs. MGI Supply Ltd. enters into these opposite position DFIs with international counterparties,investment strategies of our portfolios are structured by selecting horizons that consider each currency’s cash flow requirements in order to transferpreserve liquidity.

The PMI Group mitigates the related priceliquidity risk within its companies through several mechanisms, the most important of which is the centralized treasury or “in-house bank,” which provides access to such parties. This mechanism allows Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicalsa syndicated credit line for up to maintain its natural risk profile, after giving effectU.S. $700,000,000, as well as to the DFIs. Because neither Bulletin C-10 nor ASC Topic 815 “Derivativesadditional cash in custody. In addition, the companies in the PMI Group have access to bilateral credit lines from financial institutions for up to U.S. $250,000,000.

The companies in the PMI Group monitor their cash flow on a daily basis and Hedging” allows derivative positions to serveprotect their creditworthiness in the financial markets. Liquidity risk is mitigated by monitoring the maximum/minimum permissible financial ratios as hedges for other derivatives, these operations are treated, for accounting purposes, as having been enteredset forth in the policies approved by each company’s board of directors.

Instruments Entered into for trading purposes.Trading Purposes

The following tables set forthshow our portfoliocash flow maturities as well as the fair value of our debt and DFIsDFI portfolios as of December 31, 2011.2013. It should be noted that:

 

for debt obligations, this table presentsthese tables present principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates for fixed rate debt;

for interest rate and currency swaps, this table presentsthese tables present notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates;

 

for natural gas DFIs, volumes are presented in millions of British thermal units (MMBtu), and average fixed and strike prices are presented in U.S. dollars per MMBtu;

 

weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates inobtained from the interbank market yield curve at the reporting date;

 

for natural gas DFIs, volumes are presented in MMBtu, and fixed average and strike prices are presented in U.S. dollars per MMBtu;

a DFI’s fair values are obtained fromvalue includes CVA and is calculated based on market quotes receivedobtained from market sources such as Reuters and Bloomberg and, with regard toBloomberg; forward curves for natural gas forward curves are supplied by the Kiodex Risk Workbench platform;

 

where quotesfor PMI Trading, prices used in commercial transactions and DFIs are not available, published by reputable sources that are widely used in international markets, such as CME-NYMEX, Platts and Argus, among others;

fair value is calculated internally, by discounting fromcash flows with the corresponding zero coupon yield curve in the original currency;

 

for all instruments, the tables showare based on the contract terms in order to determine future cash flows categorized by expected maturity dates;

 

thethis information is presented in equivalentsthousands of the peso, which is our reporting currency; and

each instrument’s actual cash flows are denominated in U.S. dollars or other foreign currenciespesos (except as indicated in parentheses.noted).

Quantitative Disclosure of Market Risk (Interest Rate Sensitivity)Debt Cash Flows’ Maturities as of December 31, 20112013(1)(2)

 

 Year of Expected Maturity Date Total Carrying
Value
  Fair Value  Year of Expected Maturity Date Total Carrying
Value
  Fair Value 
 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thereafter  2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 
 (in thousands of nominal pesos)    (in thousands of nominal pesos) 

Liabilities

                

Outstanding debt

                

Fixed rate (U.S. dollars)(2)

  14,743,777    4,183,896    9,637,600    29,562,908    5,412,508    236,414,763           299,955,451    327,760,373   18,827,853   30,599,245   8,012,990   7,282,939   54,091,020   304,856,256   423,670,303   447,282,809  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                          6.0291                             5.4470    

Fixed rate (Japanese yen)

  1,642,825    1,642,825    1,642,825    1,642,825    1,058,484    5,968,225    13,598,010    12,964,084   1,128,140   1,128,140   726,869   363,422       3,735,000   7,081,571   7,714,998  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                          2.7726                             2.9070    

Fixed rate (Pounds)

      8,697,000                7,609,875    16,306,875    18,794,903  

Fixed rate (pounds)

                     7,528,128   7,528,128   10,022,857  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                          7.8500                             8.2500    

Fixed rate (pesos)

  3,600,000            9,500,000    7,500,000    20,000,000    40,600,000    40,487,033       9,500,000   7,498,990           51,230,219   68,229,209   72,738,704  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                          9.0924                             8.1873    

Fixed rate (UDIs)

                      21,438,199    21,438,199    15,295,903                       26,746,411   26,746,411   25,295,383  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                          7.3774                             3.6143    

Fixed rate (euros)

  961    9,080,711    504    47    15,435,598    39,950,900    64,468,721    68,391,694   500   46   15,316,513   21,511,809       41,245,103   78,073,971   88,219,672  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                          5.8307                             4.9780    

Fixed rate (Swiss Francs)

          7,459,950                7,459,950    7,730,880  

Fixed rate (Swiss francs)

 7,352,900                   4,403,283   11,756,183   12,200,636  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                         3.1255    

Fixed rate (Australian dollars)

             1,747,544           1,747,544   1,917,297  

Average Interest Rate (%)

                          3.5000                             6.1250    
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total fixed rate debt

  19,987,563    23,604,433    18,740,879    40,705,780    29,406,590    331,381,962    463,827,207    491,424,869    27,309,393    41,227,431    31,555,362    30,905,714    54,091,020    439,744,400    624,833,320    665,392,357  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Variable rate (U.S. dollars)

  62,013,937    44,325,803    18,917,228    12,560,042    40,045,171    25,745,906    203,608,087    194,228,316   25,497,804   14,778,763   38,952,740   12,424,670   13,994,202   15,177,965   120,826,144   123,407,193  

Variable rate (Japanese yen)

          3,798,235            11,603,200    15,401,435    13,002,520   2,608,275                   7,968,000   10,576,275   10,995,410  

Variable rate (euros)

  4,854,647    4,821,377    4,837,991                14,514,015    15,993,060   4,779,803                       4,779,803   5,041,659  

Variable rate (pesos)

  15,033,333    13,820,733    20,666,667    9,126,447    11,166,667    7,000,000    76,813,847    74,045,162   20,666,667   9,118,368   11,094,119   23,442,426       6,088,290   70,409,870   71,159,977  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total variable rate debt

  81,901,918    62,967,913    48,220,121    21,686,488    51,211,838    44,349,106    310,337,383    297,269,059    53,552,549    23,897,131    50,046,859    35,867,096    13,994,202    29,234,255    206,592,092    210,604,238  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total debt(2)

  101,889,481    86,572,346    66,961,000    62,392,268    80,618,428    375,731,068    774,164,591    788,693,928  

Total debt

  80,861,942    65,124,562    81,602,221    66,772,810    68,085,222    468,978,655    831,425,412    875,996,595  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)The information in this table has been calculated using exchange rates at December 31, 20112013 of: Ps. 13.990413.0765 = U.S. $1.00; Ps. 0.18130.1245 = 1.00 Japanese yen; Ps. 21.742521.6560 = 1.00 British pound; Ps. 4.691316 =5.058731= 1.00 UDI; Ps. 18.159518.0194 = 1.00 euro andeuro; Ps. 14.919914.7058 = 1.00 Swiss Franc.franc and Ps. 11.6982 = 1.00 Australian dollar.
(2)Includes notes payable to contractors.Figures in this table do not include accrued interest.

Source: Petróleos Mexicanos.

Quantitative Disclosure of Market Risk (Interest Rate, Currency and Equity Risk)Cash Flows’ Maturities from Derivative Financial Instruments Held or Issued for Purposes other than Trading as of December 31, 20112013(1)2)

Derivative financial instruments held or issued for purposes other than trading:(2)

 

 Year of Expected Maturity Date Total
Notional
Amount
  Fair
Value(3)
  Year of Expected Maturity Date Total
Notional
Amount
  Fair
Value(3)
 
 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thereafter  2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 
 (in thousands of nominal pesos, except as noted)  (in thousands of nominal pesos, except as noted) 

Hedging Instruments(2)(4)

                

Interest Rate DFIs

                

Interest Rate Swaps (U.S. dollars)

                

Variable to Fixed

  43,885    46,259    48,762    51,400    54,180    276,587    521,073    (51,030 903,252   1,155,684   1,163,103   1,171,060   1,179,378   5,907,161   11,479,638   36,019  

Average pay rate

  5.28  5.28  5.28  5.28  5.28  5.28  5.28  n.a.   4.31 3.80 3.88 3.96 4.04 3.51 n.a.   n.a.  

Average receive rate

  2.31  2.51  2.79  3.42  3.93  4.75  3.87  n.a.   1.66 1.46 2.64 4.17 5.36 6.03 n.a.   n.a.  

Interest Rate Swaps (pesos)

                

Variable to Fixed

  1,200,000    7,500,000                    8,700,000    (760,027                                

Average pay rate

  11.38  11.48                  11.43  n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.  

Average receive rate

  4.98  5.15                  5.07  n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.   n.a.  

Currency DFIs

                

Cross Currency Swaps

                

Receive euros/

Pay U.S. dollars

      9,079,770            14,389,126    41,478,108    64,947,004    (2,713,982         13,449,180   22,464,185       41,205,171   77,118,535   1,153,442  

Receive Japanese yen/

Pay U.S. dollars

  1,151,831    1,151,831    3,949,909    1,151,831    721,359    14,809,876    22,936,636    6,374,421   3,691,887   1,076,589   674,237   337,110       14,355,308   20,135,132   (3,016,981

Receive Pounds/

Pay U.S. dollars

      9,549,707                8,303,764    17,853,471    (294,596

Receive pounds/

Pay U.S. dollars

                     8,322,630   8,322,630   90,303  

Receive UDI/

Pay pesos

                      21,191,755    21,191,755    698,943                       26,174,756   26,174,756   434,082  

Receive Swiss Francs/

Pay U.S. dollars

          6,694,755                6,694,755    802,898  

Receive Swiss francs/ Pay U.S. dollars

 6,257,431                   4,296,391   10,553,822   1,132,123  

Receive Australian dollars/ Pay U.S. dollars

             2,032,873           2,032,873   (178,770

Exchange Rate Forward

                

Receive euros/

Pay U.S. dollars

  4,837,991    4,837,991    4,837,991                14,513,974    (279,474 4,800,666                       4,800,666   158,144  
 (in thousands of shares) (in thousands of
nominal pesos)
  (in thousands of shares) (in thousands of
nominal pesos)
 

Equity DFIs

          

Equity Options on Repsol shares

  19,068    19,068    19,068                57,204    125,002   19,068                       19,068   101,458  

Non-Hedging Instruments

                

Equity DFIs

                

Equity Swaps on Repsol shares

  58,680                        58,680    1,520,056   67,970                       67,970   545,379  

 

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

n.a. = not applicable.

(1)The information in this table has been calculated using the exchange rate at December 31, 20112013 of Ps. 13.990413.0765 = U.S. $1.00 and Ps. 18.159518.0194 = 1.00 euro.
(2)PEMEX’sOur management uses these DFIs to hedge market risk; however, these DFIs do not qualify for accounting purposes as hedges and are recorded in our financial statements as entered into for trading purposes.
(3)Positive numbers represent a favorable fair value to PEMEX.us. These values include CVA.
(4)PMI’s risk management policies and procedures establish that DFIs should be used only for hedging purposes; however DFIs are not recorded as hedges for accounting purposes.

Source: Petróleos Mexicanos and P.M.I. Trading, Ltd.PEMEX.

Quantitative Disclosure of Market RiskCash Flows’ Maturities from Derivative Financial Instruments (Natural Gas Derivatives)Gas) Held or Issued for Purposes other than Trading as of December 31, 20112013(1)(2)

Derivative financial instruments held for trading purposes:

 

 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thereafter Total
Volume
 Fair
Value(2)
   2014 2015 2017 2017 2018   Thereafter   Total
Volume
 Fair
Value(2)
 
 (in MMBtu, except that average fixed and strike prices are in U.S. $ per
MMBtu)
 (in
thousands
of nominal
pesos)
   (in MMBtu, except that average fixed and strike prices are in U.S. $ per
MMBtu)
 (in thousands
of nominal
pesos)
 

Derivatives entered into with Customers of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

Derivatives entered into with Customers of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

  

           

Short

                   

European Call Option

  2,824,904    1,353,954    1,162,564    250,500    122,400        5,714,322    (6,262   (5,842,014  (884,700  (219,550  (8,000            (6,954,264  (23,757

Average strike price

  5.96    6.73    6.88    5    5        6.27    n.a.     4.54    4.64    4.89    4.75              4.57    n.a.  

Variable to Fixed Swap(3)

  26,073,621.3    2,816,654    279,150    114,000    28,500        29,311,925    629,393     (1,409,090  (181,200  (129,000                (1,719,290  5,731  

Average fixed price

  4.48    7.47    5.02    4.85    4.78        4.78    n.a.     4.27    4.68    4.48                  4.33    n.a.  

Long

                   

European Call Option

      66,672                    66,672    10                                     

Average strike price

      8.00                    8.00    n.a.                                   n.a.  

Variable to Fixed Swap(4)

  122,115                        122,115    (2,386

Average fixed price

  4.52                        4.52    n.a.  

Derivatives entered into with Third Parties to Offset Transactions entered into with Customers

Derivatives entered into with Third Parties to Offset Transactions entered into with Customers

  

           

Short

                   

European Call Option

      66,672                    66,672    (10                                   

Average strike price

      8.00                    8.00    n.a.                                   n.a.  

Long

                      

European Call Option

  2,818,604    1,353,954    1,162,564    250,500    122,400        5,708,022    6,261     5,842,014    884,700    219,550    8,000              6,954,264    23,931  

Average strike price

  5.96    6.73    6.88    5.00    5.00        6.27    n.a.     4.54    4.64    4.89    4.75              4.57    n.a.  

Variable to Fixed Swap(4)

  25,948,513    2,814,654    279,150    114,000    28,500        29,184,817    (606,221   1,409,090    181,200    129,000                  1,719,290    (3,965

Average fixed price

  4.43    7.41    4.88    4.73    4.63        4.73    n.a.     4.19    4.58    4.41                  4.25    n.a.  

 

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
n.a. = not applicable.

n.a. = not applicable.

(1)The information in this table has been calculated using the exchange rate at December 31, 20112013 of Ps. 13.990413.0765 = U.S. $1.00.
(2)Positive numbers represent a favorable fair value to PEMEX.us. These values include CVA.
(3)Under short variable to fixed swaps entered into with customers of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, PEMEXwe will pay a variable price and receive the fixed price specified in the contract.
(4)Under long variable to fixed swaps entered into with customers of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, PEMEXwe will pay the fixed price specified in the contract and receive a variable price.

Source: Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.Petrochemicals.

Quantitative Disclosure of Market RiskCash Flows’ Maturities from Derivative Financial Instruments (Petroleum Products) Held or Issued for Purposes other than Trading as of December 31, 20112013(1)

Derivative financial instruments held or issued for purposes other than trading:(2)

 

   2012  2013   2014   2015   2016   Thereafter   Total
Volume
  Fair
Value(3)
 
      (in thousands of barrels)  

(in
thousands

of nominal

pesos)

 

Hedging Instruments(2)

              

OTC fixed for floating swaps

   (551                           (551  (23,473

Exchange-traded futures(4)

   (3,625                           (3,625  (112,897

Exchange-traded swaps(5)

   (3,319                           (3,319  (71,472
   2014  2015   2016   2017   2018   Thereafter   Total
Volume
  Fair
Value(2)
 
      (in thousands of barrels)  

(in thousands

of nominal

pesos)

 

Hedging Instruments

              

Exchange-traded futures(3)(5)

   (1,830                           (1,830  (117,525

Exchange-traded swaps(4)(5)

   (3,954                           (3,954  (58,229

 

Notes:Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
OTC = Over-the-Counter.

(1)

The information in this table has been calculated using the exchange rate at December 31, 20112013 of Ps. 13.990413.0765 = U.S. $1.00.

(2)

These DFIs do not qualify for accounting purposes as hedges and are recorded in our financial statements as entered into for trading purposes.

(3)

Positive numbers represent a favorable fair value to P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. These values include CVA.

(4)

(3)Net position.

(5)

(4)
OTC transactionsSwaps registered in NYMEXCME Clearport are included in these figures.
Source: P.M.I. Trading, Ltd.

(5)The balance of these financial instruments is recognized as cash and cash equivalents. PMI Trading considered these financial assets to be fully liquid.

Source: P.M.I. Trading, Ltd.

Item 12.Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

Not applicable.

PART II

 

Item 13.Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

Not applicable.None.

 

Item 14.Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.None.

 

Item 15.Controls and Procedures

 

(a)Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Director General and our chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2011.2013. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, effective disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Based upon our evaluation, our Director General and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20112013 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Director General and our chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

(b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with Mexican FRS.IFRS. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of PEMEX;

(1)pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with Mexican FRS, including the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP in accordance with Item 18 of Form 20-F, and that receipts and expenditures of PEMEX are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the relevant entity; and

(2)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS in accordance with Item 18 of Form 20-F, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the relevant entity; and

(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of PEMEX’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

(3)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of PEMEX’sour internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of

Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework and the Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT) created by the IT Governance Institute.Institute, which were in effect as of December 31, 2013.

Management relied on Auditing Standards No. 2 and 5 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in order to create an appropriate framework to evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of PEMEX’sour internal control over financial reporting.

Based on our assessment and those criteria, management concluded that PEMEXwe maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.2013.

 

(c)Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Not applicable.

 

(d)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 20112013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 16A.Audit Committee Financial Expert

Mr. José Fortunato Álvarez Enríquez, memberThe Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos has determined that it does not have an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of this Item 16A serving on its Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee. We believe that the combined knowledge, skills and experience of the members of the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee enable them, as a group, to act effectively in the fulfillment of Petróleos Mexicanos, qualifiestheir tasks and responsibilities. In addition, the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee can consult with outside experts as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of this Item 16A,it deems appropriate in order to provide it with advice on matters related to its tasks and is independent, as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.responsibilities.

 

Item 16B.Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act. Our Code of Ethics applies to our Director General (chief executive officer), our chief financial officer, our chief accounting officer and all other employees performing similar functions in Petróleos Mexicanos, the subsidiary entities and the subsidiary companies. Our Code of Ethics is available on our website at http://www.pemex.com. If we amend the provisions of our Code of Ethics that apply to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, our chief accounting officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address.

In addition, all of our employees are currently also subject to the Code of Ethics for Public Servants of the Federal Public Administration, which was issued by the SFP in July 2002 pursuant to the requirements of the Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Officials in order to establish clear rules to promote and enforce legal and ethical standards of conduct and to prevent corruption and corporate abuses by Mexican public officials. See “Item 8—Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Mexican Government Audits and Other Investigations” for more information.

 

Item 16C.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

In accordance with the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee, of Petróleos Mexicanos, in its meeting held on September 22, 2010,October 8, 2013, and effective as of November 15, 2013, appointed KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.BDO Mexico as external auditor of the financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and of the consolidated financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities for the fiscal year 2010,years 2013 and 2014, prepared in accordance with

Normas de Información Financiera Gubernamental para el Sector Paraestatal (Mexican Standards for Governmental Accounting Standards.Financial Information for Public Sector Entities). The Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos also appointed KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.,BDO Mexico as external auditor to audit the consolidated financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities and subsidiary companies for the fiscal year 2010,years 2013 and 2014, prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS and standards issued by the PCAOB,IFRS, as well as to perform other services associated with the auditing of such consolidatedour financial statements. See “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee.”

In accordance with the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos, in its meeting held on September 6, 2011, appointed KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. as external auditor of the financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and of the consolidated financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities for the fiscal year 2011, prepared in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards. The Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos also appointed KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C., as external auditor, to audit the consolidated financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities and subsidiary companies for the fiscal year 2011, prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS and standards issued by the PCAOB, as well as to perform other services associated with the auditing of such consolidated financial statements. See “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee.”

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed and billable to us during the fiscal year 2013 by BDO Mexico, our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2013, and by KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C., our independent registered public accounting firm duringfor the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2010 and 2011.2012.

 

 Year ended December 31, 
             2010                          2011                Year ended
December 31,

2012
   Year ended
December 31,
2013
 
 (in thousands of nominal pesos)   (in thousands of nominal pesos) 

Audit fees

  Ps.          41,244    Ps.        47,045    Ps. 54,308    Ps. 27,961  

Audit-related fees

  12,332    17,915     9,756     0  

Tax fees

  41         1,558     0  

Other fees

  373    631     3,452     0  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total fees

  Ps.         53,990    Ps.        65,591    Ps. 69,074    Ps. 27,961  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2013 in the table above are the aggregate fees billable by BDO Mexico for services provided in connection with the audits of our annual financial statements in 2013, statutory filings and statutory audits, as well as filings with financial regulators and services provided in accordance with the instructions of the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee.

Audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2012 shown in the table above are the aggregate fees billed and billable by KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. for services provided in connection with the audits of our annual financial statements in each year,2012, statutory filings and statutory audits, as well as services provided in accordance with the instructions of the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos and the SFP, respectively. Committee.

Audit-related fees in the table above table are the aggregate fees billed by KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. for services provided in 2010 and 20112012 in connection with regulatory filings, limited reviewsreview of interim financial information, review of public filings of financial information and reviewreviews of documents related to the offeringofferings of securities. Othersecurities, as well as comfort and consent letters.

Tax fees in the table above table are fees billed by KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. in 20102012 for tax opinions and 2011tax compliance services.

Other fees in the table above are fees billed by KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. in 2012 related to an agreed-upon procedures report in order to comply with a contract entered into by a subsidiary company.

Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures

In accordance with the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos appoints and evaluates the external auditor, as well as supervises the preparation of the external auditor’s report on our financial statements. See “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee.”

On December 8, 2009, the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee of Petróleos Mexicanos issued criteria for the performance of services by the external auditor. In accordance with these criteria, the external auditor may audit the financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities and subsidiary companies for no more than four consecutive fiscal years as of the date these criteria were issued, except in special circumstances. An auditing firm that has performed such services may again be considered in the selection process for our external auditor after a period of at least two years since concluding such services.

 

Item 16D.Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

Item 16E.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Not applicable.

 

Item 16F.Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. previously served as our principal accountant. On October 8, 2013, KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. was notified that the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee engaged BDO Mexico as our principal accountant (i) to audit Petróleos Mexicanos’ financial statements and the consolidated financial statements of Petróleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary entities for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014, prepared in accordance with the Mexican Standards for Governmental Financial Information for Public Sector Entities; (ii) to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2013 and 2014, prepared in accordance with IFRS; and (iii) to perform other services associated with the auditing of our financial statements. The auditor-client relationship with KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. formally ceased on November 15, 2013 upon KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.’s completion of the limited review of our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013. The change of auditor was due to KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.’s completion of the maximum time period for an external auditor to render services to us, as set forth in the criteria issued by the Audit and Performance Evaluation Committee for the performance of services by the external auditor in accordance with Article 23 of the Petróleos Mexicanos Law. See “Item 16C—Principal Accountant Fees and Services—Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures.”

During the two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through November 15, 2013, there were no: (i) disagreements with KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures that if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to make references in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreements or (ii) “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F.

KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.’s report with respect to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and January 1, 2011 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through November 15, 2013, we did not consult BDO Mexico regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or a “reportable event” as that term is defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F. Further, during the two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through November 15, 2013, no written report or oral advice was provided that BDO Mexico concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.

We have provided KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. with a copy of the foregoing disclosure and have requested that it furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with such disclosure. A copy of KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.’s letter, dated May 15, 2014, is filed as Exhibit 15.1 to this report.

Item 16G.Corporate Governance

Not applicable.

 

Item 16G.16H.Corporate GovernanceMine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART III

 

Item 17.Financial Statements

Not applicable.

 

Item 18.Financial Statements

See pages F-1 through F-127,F-110, incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 19.Exhibits. Documents filed as exhibits to this Form 20-F:

 

1.1  Ley de Petróleos Mexicanos (Petróleos Mexicanos Law), effective November 29, 2008 (English translation) (previously filed as Exhibit 2.51.1 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 30, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein).
1.2 ��Reglamento de la Ley de Petróleos Mexicanos (Regulations to the Petróleos Mexicanos Law) effective September 5, 2009 (English translation) (previously filed as Exhibit 1.2 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 29, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
1.3  Decreto que tiene por objeto establecer la estructura, el funcionamiento y el control de los organismos subsidiarios de Petróleos Mexicanos (Decree to establish the structure, operation and control of the subsidiary entities, which we refer to as the Subsidiary Entities Decree)entities), effective March 22, 2012 (English translation) (previously filed as Exhibit 1.3 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report onForm 20-F (FileNo. 0-99) on April 30, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.1  Indenture, dated as of September 18, 1997, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company) (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Registration Statement on Form F-4 (FileNo. 333-7796) on October 17, 1997 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.2  Indenture, dated as of August 7, 1998, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company) (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Registration Statement on Form F-4 on August 11, 1998 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.3  Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2000, among the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company) (previously filed as Exhibit 2.5 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 28, 2001 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.4  First supplemental indenture dated as of September 30, 2009, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, to the indenture dated as of July 31, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 2.4 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 29, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.5  Indenture, dated as of December 30, 2004, among the Master Trust, Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (previously filed as Exhibit 2.7 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F on June 30, 2005 (File No. 0-99) and incorporated by reference herein).
2.6  First supplemental indenture dated as of September 30, 2009, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, to the indenture dated as of December 30, 2004 (previously filed as Exhibit 2.6 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 29, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).

2.7  Indenture, dated as of January 27, 2009, between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (previously filed as Exhibit 2.5 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 30, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein).

2.8  Fiscal Agency Agreement between Petróleos Mexicanos and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company), dated as of June 16, 1993, and amended and restated as of February 26, 1998 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 29, 2000 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.9  Trust Agreement, dated as of November 10, 1998, among The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York (Delaware) and Petróleos Mexicanos (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 30, 1999 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.10  Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 17, 2004, to the Trust Agreement among The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York (Delaware) and Petróleos Mexicanos (previously filed as Exhibit 2.10 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F on June 30, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.11  Amendment No. 2, dated as of December 22, 2004, to the Trust Agreement among The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York (Delaware) and Petróleos Mexicanos (previously filed as Exhibit 2.11 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F on June 30, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.12  Amendment No. 3, dated as of August 17, 2006, to the Trust Agreement among The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York (Delaware) and Petróleos Mexicanos (previously filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Petróleos Mexicanos Registration Statement on Form F-4/A (File No. 333-136674) on October 27, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.13  Assignment and Indemnity Agreement, dated as of November 10, 1998, among Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploración y Producción, Pemex-Refinación, Pemex-Gas y Petroquímica Básica and the Master Trust (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 30, 1999 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.14  Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 17, 2006, to the Assignment and Indemnity Agreement among Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploración y Producción, Pemex-Refinación, Pemex-Gas y Petroquímica Básica and the Master Trust (previously filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Petróleos Mexicanos Registration Statement on Form F-4/A (File No. 333-136674) on October 27, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein).
2.15  Guaranty Agreement, dated July 29, 1996, among Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploración y Producción, Pemex-Refinación and Pemex-Gas y Petroquímica Básica (previously filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-7796) on October 17, 1997 and incorporated by reference herein).

The registrant agrees to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, copies of any instruments that define the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant that are not filed as exhibits to this annual report.

 

  4.1  Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1998, by and among Pemex Finance, Ltd., P.M.I. Comercio Internacional, S.A. de C.V., P.M.I. Services, B.V. and Pemex-Exploración y Producción. (previously filed as Exhibit 3.3 to Petróleos Mexicanos’ annual report on Form 20-F (File No. 0-99) on June 30, 1999 and incorporated by reference herein).
  7.1  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

  8.1  For a list of subsidiaries, their jurisdiction of incorporation and the names under which they do business, see “Consolidated Structure of PEMEX” on page 3.4.
10.1  Consent letter of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
10.2  Report on Reserves Data by Ryder Scott Company, L.P., Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor, as of December 31, 2011.

2013.
10.3  Consent letters of Netherland, Sewell International, S. de R.L. de C.V.
10.4  Reports on Reserves Data by Netherland, Sewell International, S. de R.L. de C.V., Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor, as of January 1, 2012.2014.
10.5  Consent letter of DeGolyer and MacNaughton.
10.6  Report on Reserves Data by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor, as of January 1, 2012.2014.
12.1  CEO Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
12.2  CFO Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
13.1  Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350.
15.1Letter from KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. addressed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS

By: 

/S/    IMGNACIOARIO QAUESADALBERTO MBORALESEAUREGARD ÁLVAREZ

 Name: Ignacio Quesada Morales  Mario Alberto Beauregard Álvarez
 Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 30, 2012May 15, 2014

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 2009

2011

 

 


PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

INDEX

 

Contents

Page

Contents

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  F-1 through F-2

Consolidated financial statements:

  

Consolidated statements of financial position

  F-2F-3

Consolidated statements of operationscomprehensive income

  F-3F-4

Consolidated statements of changes in equity (deficit)

  F-4F-5

Consolidated statements of cash flows

  F-5F-6

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

  F-6F-7 through F-127F-111


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the General Comptroller’s Office

and the Board of Directors of

Petróleos Mexicanos:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statementsstatement of financial position of Petróleos Mexicanos, Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies (“PEMEX”) as of December 31, 2011, 20102013, and Januarythe related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of PEMEX’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 2010,to these consolidated financial statements, on December 20, 2013, theDecreto por el que se reforman y adicionan diversas disposiciones de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en Materia de Energía (Decree that amends and supplements various provisions of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States relating to energy matters, or the “Energy Reform Decree”) was published in theDiario Oficial de la Federación (Official Gazette of the Federation ). The Energy Reform Decree includes transitional articles that set forth the general framework for the secondary legislation or implementing laws, which have not been enacted at the date of this report. The Energy Reform Decree contemplates certain changes that will affect the current structure of PEMEX. PEMEX will be converted from a decentralized public entity to a productive state-owned company. The Mexican Government will carry out the exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons in Mexico through assignments to productive state-owned companies or through agreements with such productive state-owned companies or with private sector companies. PEMEX has requested that theSecretaría de Energía (Ministry of Energy) assign to it certain exploration and extraction areas in which it currently operates, based on its operational capabilities. Any such areas that PEMEX does not request or are not assigned to it will be subject to a bidding process that will be open to participation by private sector companies. The Mexican Government will form theCentro Nacional de Control del Gas Natural (National Center of Natural Gas Control), a new decentralized public entity of the Mexican Government, which will be created to own and operate the national gas pipeline system and storage infrastructure. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals will transfer and assign to the National Center of Natural Gas Control the assets and contracts necessary for it to manage this system and infrastructure. At the date of this report, the effects related to the Energy Reform Decree have not been quantified due to the fact that the general framework for the secondary legislation has not been enacted. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Petróleos Mexicanos, Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2013, and the results of their operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

CASTILLO MIRANDA Y COMPAÑÍA, S. C.

/S/ BERNARDO SOTO PEÑAFIEL

C.P.C. Bernardo Soto Peñafiel

Mexico City, Mexico

May 14, 2014

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the General Comptroller’s Office

and the Board of Directors of

Petróleos Mexicanos:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of Petróleos Mexicanos, Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies (“PEMEX”) as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of PEMEX’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and with auditing standards generally accepted in Mexico.. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Petróleos Mexicanos, Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and January 1, 2010,2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, in conformity with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards.

As discussed in Note 3(ab)(i) to the consolidated financial statements, PEMEX has changed its method of accounting and reporting for inventory effective January 1, 2011 with retroactive application due to the adoption of MexicanInternational Financial Reporting Standards C-4 “Inventories.”as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Mexican Financial Reporting Standards vary in certain significant respects from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.

 

KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.

/S/ EJDUARDOOSÉ PGALOMINOILBERTO

ALFARO SERVÍN

Eduardo PalominoJosé Gilberto Alfaro Servín

Mexico City, Mexico

April 30, 2012

2013

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 20112013 AND 20102012

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

  December 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
  January 1,
2010
 
  (Unaudited;
in thousands of
U.S. dollars)
     (Restated
Note 3(ab))
  
(Restated
Note 3(ab))
 

ASSETS:

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 5)

 U.S.  $8,370,033   Ps.  117,100,111   Ps.  133,587,079   Ps.  159,760,316  

Accounts, notes receivable and other—Net (Note 6)

  11,054,628    154,658,669    120,887,383    126,755,377  

Inventories—Net (Notes 7 and 3(ab)(i))

  3,155,911    44,152,462    40,518,866    38,449,015  

Derivative financial instruments (Note 12)

  1,208,188    16,903,030    20,917,211    26,277,917  

Available-for-sale investment securities (Note 8)

  1,762,350    24,655,980          
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  17,181,077    240,370,141    182,323,460    191,482,309  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

  25,551,110    357,470,252    315,910,539    351,242,625  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others (Note 9)

  923,016    12,913,364    11,116,080    9,762,401  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment—Net (Note 10)

  82,378,322    1,152,505,680    1,061,387,901    967,591,500  

Other assets—Net

  747,347    10,455,680    6,782,060    4,986,588  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

 U.S.  $109,599,795   Ps.  1,533,344,976   Ps.  1,395,196,580   Ps.  1,333,583,114  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES:

    

Current liabilities:

    

Current portion of long-term debt (Note 11)

 U.S.  $7,898,091   Ps.  110,497,449   Ps.  89,554,617   Ps.  102,600,324  

Suppliers

  3,810,697    53,313,171    43,474,439    63,277,711  

Accounts and accrued expenses payable

  937,037    13,109,526    9,602,215    11,590,917  

Taxes and duties payable

  4,701,113    65,770,459    52,565,900    48,453,301  

Derivative financial instruments (Note 12)

  770,478    10,779,297    12,056,457    17,038,139  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

  18,117,416    253,469,902    207,253,628    242,960,392  

Long-term liabilities:

    

Long-term debt (Note 11)

  48,052,601    672,275,110    575,170,797    529,258,434  

Reserve for sundry creditors and others

  4,594,884    64,284,261    55,493,441    43,524,319  

Reserve for employee benefits (Note 13)

  52,251,329    731,016,999    661,365,065    576,200,934  

Deferred taxes (Notes 19(k) and 19(m))

  444,436    6,217,833    7,215,760    6,933,120  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  123,460,666    1,727,264,105    1,506,498,691    1,398,877,199  

EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Note 15):

    

Certificates of Contribution “A”

  6,930,323    96,957,993    96,957,993    96,957,993  

Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos

  12,893,300    180,382,423    180,382,423    180,382,301  

Legal reserve

  70,587    987,535    987,535    987,535  

Donation surplus

  246,365    3,446,743    3,446,743    1,004,346  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  947,978    13,262,597    4,396,294    6,319,602  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  21,088,553    295,037,291    286,170,988    285,651,777  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated losses:

    

(Deficit) from prior years (Note 3(ab)(i))

  (28,410,417  (397,473,099  (350,945,862  (350,945,862

Net (loss) for the year (Note 3(ab)(i))

  (6,539,007  (91,483,321  (46,527,237    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  (34,949,424  (488,956,420  (397,473,099  (350,945,862
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total (deficit)

  (13,860,871  (193,919,129  (111,302,111  (65,294,085
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 U.S.  $  109,599,795   Ps.  1,533,344,976   Ps.  1,395,196,580   Ps.  1,333,583,114  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Note December 31,
2013
  December 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
 
     

(Unaudited;

U.S. dollars)

       

ASSETS:

     

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

  5 U.S. $6,174,872   Ps.80,745,719   Ps.119,234,891  

Accounts, notes receivable and other

  6  9,368,869    122,512,011    133,009,511  

Inventories

  7  4,352,426    56,914,500    56,847,570  

Derivative financial instruments

  13  515,554    6,741,640    9,050,153  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

    20,411,721    266,913,870    318,142,125  

Non-current assets:

     

Investments in equity instruments

  8  1,355,758    17,728,571    15,771,259  

Permanent investments in associates

  9  1,283,180    16,779,501    14,646,263  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment—net

  10  131,654,398    1,721,578,741    1,658,734,085  

Deferred taxes

  17  190,660    2,493,162    1,935,997  

Restricted cash

  5  588,980    7,701,798    2,605,332  

Other assets

  11  1,085,513    14,194,710    12,347,835  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

   U.S. $136,158,489   Ps.1,780,476,483   Ps. 1,706,040,771  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   U.S. $156,570,210   Ps. 2,047,390,353   Ps. 2,024,182,896  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES:

     

Current liabilities:

     

Current portion of long-term debt

  12 U.S. $6,934,344   Ps.90,676,943   Ps.114,241,005  

Suppliers

    8,163,132    106,745,193    61,513,451  

Accounts and accrued expenses payable

    1,085,514    14,194,719    9,315,539  

Derivative financial instruments

  13  480,594    6,284,482    6,752,811  

Taxes and duties payable

  17  3,157,534    41,289,495    43,980,843  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

    19,821,118    259,190,832    235,803,649  

Long-term liabilities:

     

Long-term debt

  12  57,397,887    750,563,471    672,617,595  

Employee benefits

  14  85,589,253    1,119,207,870    1,288,540,759  

Provisions for sundry creditors

  15  5,292,655    69,209,398    63,802,794  

Other liabilities

    566 337    7,405,724    6,346,034  

Deferred taxes

  17  2,069,338    27,059,698    28,137,915  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total long-term liabilities

   U.S. $150,915,470   Ps.1,973,446,161   Ps. 2,059,445,097  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   U.S. $170,736,588   Ps.2,232,636,993   Ps. 2,295,248,746  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EQUITY (DEFICIT):

  18   

Controlling interest:

     

Certificates of Contribution “A”

    8,764,183    114,604,835    49,604,835  

Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos

    8,818,391    115,313,691    178,730,591  

Legal reserve

    76,636    1,002,130    977,760  

Accumulated other comprehensive result

    (9,870,044  (129,065,629  (383,337,573

Accumulated losses:

     

(Deficit) from prior years

    (9,003,932  (117,739,916  (120,572,948

Net (loss) profit for the year

    (12,990,145  (169,865,633  2,833,032  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total controlling interest

   U.S. $(14,204,911 Ps.(185,750,522 Ps.(271,764,303

Total non-controlling interest

    38,533    503,882    698,453  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity (deficit)

   U.S. $(14,166,378 Ps.(185,246,640 Ps.(271,065,850
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity (deficit)

   U.S. $156,570,210   Ps.2,047,390,353   Ps.2,024,182,896  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

  2011  2011  2010  2009 
  (Unaudited; in
thousands of U.S.
dollars)
     (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
 

Net sales:

    

Domestic

 U.S.  $55,695,189   Ps.  779,197,974   Ps.  683,853,335   Ps.  596,369,519  

Export

  55,249,697    772,965,362    592,907,683    488,260,296  

Services income

  447,849    6,265,586    5,303,292    5,291,516  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  111,392,735    1,558,428,922    1,282,064,310    1,089,921,331  

Cost of sales (Notes 3(g) and 3(ab)(i))

  55,797,228    780,625,539    631,355,045    560,842,783  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

  55,595,507    777,803,383    650,709,265    529,078,548  

General expenses:

    

Transportation and distribution expenses

  2,240,752    31,349,011    33,274,186    31,856,197  

Administrative expenses

  4,648,119    65,029,047    70,978,545    68,652,803  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total general expenses

  6,888,871    96,378,058    104,252,731    100,509,000  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

  48,706,636    681,425,325    546,456,534    428,569,548  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other revenues (principally IEPS benefit)—Net (Notes 19(j) and 3(ab)(iii))

  13,977,076    195,544,884    71,585,528    39,768,759  

Comprehensive financing result:

    

Interest paid—Net (includes valuation effects of derivative financial instruments (Notes 12(viii) and 3(z))

  (2,347,378  (32,840,763  (32,136,671  (29,992,464

Exchange (loss) gain—Net (Note 3(z))

  (4,202,927  (58,800,623  20,167,333    14,684,597  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  (6,550,305  (91,641,386  (11,969,338  (15,307,867

(Loss) profit sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others (Notes 3(ab)(iii) and 9)

  (56,924  (796,398  1,540,688    (767,228
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before taxes, duties and other charges

  56,076,483    784,532,425    607,613,412    452,263,212  

Hydrocarbon extraction duties and others (Note 19)

  62,306,063    871,686,746    649,956,286    542,374,559  

Hydrocarbon income tax (Note 19(k))

  50,640    708,469    2,459,557    2,502,651  

Income tax (Note 19(m))

  258,787    3,620,531    1,724,806    1,755,848  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  62,615,490    876,015,746    654,140,649    546,633,058  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss for the year

 U.S.  $(6,539,007 Ps.  (91,483,321 Ps.  (46,527,237 Ps.  (94,369,846
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Note 2013  2013  2012  2011 
    

(Unaudited;

U.S. dollars)

          

Net sales:

     

Domestic

  U.S. $69,604,836   Ps.910,187,634   Ps. 867,036,701   Ps.779,197,974  

Export

   52,588,815    687,677,634    772,699,053    772,965,362  

Services income

   790,682    10,339,357    7,176,286    6,290,781  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   122,984,333    1,608,204,625    1,646,912,040    1,558,454,117  

Cost of sales

 3(g)  62,249,557    814,006,338    832,490,574    778,776,371  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

   60,734,776    794,198,287    814,421,466    779,677,746  

Other revenues and expenses—net

 19  4,934,566    64,526,850    209,018,963    189,119,861  

General expenses:

     

Transportation and distribution expenses

   2,481,431    32,448,436    28,488,283    26,709,677  

Administrative expenses

   7,544,410    98,654,472    89,612,849    80,776,819  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   55,643,501    727,622,229    905,339,297    861,311,111  

Financing income

 20  1,875,671    24,527,209    23,214,838    30,584,234  

Financing cost

 20  (4,134,671  (54,067,021  (72,951,238  (63,236,207

Exchange (loss) gain—net

   (302,183  (3,951,492  44,845,661    (60,143,252
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (2,561,183  (33,491,304  (4,890,739  (92,795,225

Profit (loss) sharing in associates

 9  54,044    706,710    4,797,607    (810,753
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before taxes, duties and other

   53,136,362    694,837,635    905,246,165    767,705,133  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Hydrocarbon extraction duties and others

 17  65,564,661    857,356,289    898,397,659    871,686,746  

Hydrocarbon income tax

 17(k)  289,645    3,787,543    2,392,919    (677,390

Income tax

 17(m)  286,945    3,752,230    1,855,109    3,638,034  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total taxes, duties and other

   66,141,251    864,896,062    902,645,687    874,647,390  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year

  U.S. $(13,004,889 Ps.(170,058,427 Ps.2,600,478   Ps.(106,942,257
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive results:

     

Investments in equity instruments

  U.S. $340,572   Ps.4,453,495   Ps.(10,125,874 Ps.3,872,160  

Actuarial gains (losses)—employee benefits

   18,917,602    247,376,029    (364,878,859  (14,890,060

Cumulative currency translation effect

   186,643    2,440,643    (1,838,242  4,573,141  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive results

   19,444,817    254,270,167    (376,842,975  (6,444,759
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive result for the year

  U.S. $6,439,928   Ps.84,211,740   Ps.(374,242,497 Ps.(113,387,016
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) for the year attributable to:

     

Controlling interest

  U.S. $(12,990,145 Ps.(169,865,633 Ps.2,833,032   Ps.(106,732,090

Non-controlling interest

   (14,744  (192,794  (232,554  (210,167
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year

  U.S. $(13,004,889 Ps.(170,058,427 Ps.2,600,478   Ps.(106,942,257
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive results attributable to:

     

Controlling interest

  U.S. $19,444,954   Ps.254,271,944   Ps.(376,775,350 Ps.(6,562,223

Non-controlling interest

   (137  (1,777  (67,625  117,464  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive results for the year

  U.S. $19,444,817   Ps.254,270,167   Ps.(376,842,975 Ps.(6,444,759
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) for the year:

     

Controlling interest

  U.S. $6,454,809   Ps.84,406,311   Ps.(373,942,318 Ps.(113,294,313

Non-controlling interest

   (14,881  (194,571  (300,179  (92,703
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive result for the year

  U.S. $6,439,928   Ps.84,211,740   Ps.(374,242,497 Ps.(113,387,016
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

              Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)       
  Certificates
of
Contribution
“A”
  Mexican
Government
contributions
to Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Legal
reserve
  Donation
surplus
  Investment
Securities
  Derivative
financial
instruments
  Cumulative
currency
translation

effect
  (Accumulated losses)
Retained earnings
    
        For the year  From prior years  Total 

Previously reported balances as of January 1, 2009

 Ps.  96,957,993   Ps.  179,915,091   Ps.  987,535   Ps. 884,462   Ps. —   Ps. (2,374,351)   Ps. 8,344,483   Ps. (112,076,444)   Ps. (145,753,335)   Ps. 26,885,434  

Retrospective effect of the adoption of FRS C-4 (Note 3(ab)(i))

                              1,253,763        1,253,763  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted balances as of January 1, 2009

  96,957,993    179,915,091    987,535    884,462        (2,374,351  8,344,483    (110,822,681  (145,753,335  28,139,197  

Transfer to prior years’ accumulated losses approved by the Board of Directors

                              110,822,681    (110,822,681    

Retrospective effect of the adoption of FRS C-4 (Note 3(ab)(i))

                              292,172        292,172  

Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos (Note 15)

      467,210                                467,210  

Increase in donation surplus (Note 15)

              119,884                        119,884  

Comprehensive loss for the year (Note 14)

                      2,532,882    (2,183,412  (94,662,018      (94,312,548
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted balances as of January 1, 2010

  96,957,993    180,382,301    987,535    1,004,346        158,531    6,161,071    (94,369,846  (256,576,016  (65,294,085

Transfer to prior years’ accumulated losses approved by the Board of Directors

                              94,369,846    (94,369,846    

Retrospective effect of the adoption of FRS C-4 (Note 3(ab)(i))

                              935,371        935,371  

Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos (Note 15)

      122                                122  

Increase in donation surplus (Note 15)

              2,442,397                        2,442,397  

Comprehensive loss for the year (Note 14)

                      (390,909  (1,532,399  (47,462,608      (49,385,916
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted balances as of December 31, 2010

  96,957,993    180,382,423    987,535    3,446,743        (232,378  4,628,672    (46,527,237  (350,945,862  (111,302,111

Transfer to prior years’ accumulated losses approved by the Board of Directors

                              46,527,237    (46,527,237    

Comprehensive loss for the year (Note 14)

                  3,872,160    232,378    4,761,765    (91,483,321      (82,617,018
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2011

 Ps.  96,957,993   Ps. 180,382,423   Ps.987,535   Ps.3,446,743   Ps.3,872,160   Ps.   Ps.9,390,437   Ps. (91,483,321)   Ps. (397,473,099 Ps. (193,919,129
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unaudited (in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 U.S.   $6,930,323   U.S.   $12,893,300   U.S.   $70,587   U.S.   $246,365   U.S.  $276,773   U.S.  $   U.S.  $671,206   U.S.  $(6,539,007 U.S.  $(28,410,417)   U.S.  $(13,860,871)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    Controlling interest       
             Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)             
  Note Certificates of
Contribution “A”
  Mexican
Government
contributions to
Petróleos

Mexicanos
  Legal reserve  Investments in
equity

instruments
  Cumulative
currency
translation
effect
  Actuarial gains
(losses)—employee
benefits
  Accumulated losses          
        For the year  From prior
years
  Total  Non-controlling
interest
  Total
equity
 

Balances as of December 31, 2011

  Ps.49,604,835   Ps.178,730,591   Ps.977,760   Ps.3,872,160   Ps.4,455,677   Ps.(14,890,060 Ps.(106,732,090 Ps.(13,840,858 Ps.102,178,015   Ps.998,632   Ps.103,176,647  

Transfer to prior years’ accumulated losses approved by the Board of Directors

   —      —      —      —      —      —      106,732,090    (106,732,090  —      —      —    

Comprehensive income (loss) for the year

   —      —      —      (10,125,874  (1,770,617  (364,878,859  2,833,032    —      (373,942,318  (300,179  (374,242,497
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2012

 18 Ps.49,604,835   Ps.178,730,591   Ps.977,760   Ps.(6,253,714 Ps.2,685,060   Ps.(379,768,919 Ps.2,833,032   Ps.(120,572,948 Ps.(271,764,303 Ps.698,453   Ps.(271,065,850

Transfer to prior years’ accumulated losses approved by the Board of Directors

   —      —      —      —      —      —      (2,833,032  2,833,032    —      —      —    

Increase in Certificates of Contribution “A”

 18(a)  65,000,000    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      65,000,000    —      65,000,000  

Decrease in Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos

 18(b)  —      (65,000,000  —      —      —      —      —      —      (65,000,000  —      (65,000,000

Increase in Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos

 18(b)  —      3,583,100    —      —      —      —      —      —      3,583,100    —      3,583,100  

Increase in Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos—uncalled capital

 18(b)  —      (2,000,000  —      —      —      —      —      —      (2,000,000  —      (2,000,000

Increase in legal reserve

 18(c)  —      —      24,370    —      —      —      —      —      24,370    —      24,370  

Comprehensive income (loss) for the year

   —      —      —      4,453,495    2,442,420    247,376,029    (169,865,633  —      84,406,311    (194,571  84,211,740  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2013

 18 Ps.114,604,835   Ps.115,313,691   Ps.1,002,130   Ps.(1,800,219 Ps.5,127,480   Ps.(132,392,890 Ps.(169,865,633 Ps.(117,739,916 Ps.(185,750,522 Ps.503,882   Ps.(185,246,640
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2013 (Unaudited U.S. dollars)

  U.S. $8,764,183   U.S. $8,818,391   U.S. $76,636   U.S. $(137,668 U.S. $392,114   U.S. $(10,124,490 U.S. $(12,990,145 U.S. $(9,003,932 U.S. $(14,204,911 U.S. $38,533   U.S. $(14,166,378
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

 2011 2011 2010 2009  2013 2013 2012 2011 
 (Unaudited; in
thousands of U.S.
dollars)
   (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
 (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
  

(Unaudited;

U.S. dollars)

       

Operating activities:

        

Income before taxes, duties and other charges

 U.S.  $56,076,483    Ps.  784,532,425    Ps.  607,613,412    Ps.  452,263,212  

Net (loss) income for the year

  U.S. $(13,004,889 Ps.(170,058,427 Ps.2,600,478   Ps.(106,942,257

Activities related to investing activities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

  6,987,150    97,753,018    96,481,781    76,890,687    11,355,615    148,491,704   140,537,720   127,380,409  

Impairment of properties, pipelines, plant and equipment

  (835,561  (11,689,832  9,958,603    1,731,229  

Impairment of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  1,958,386    25,608,835    —     (6,855,535

Unsuccessful wells

  859,264    12,021,450    11,619,243    15,124,465    955,739    12,497,726   13,842,410   12,021,450  

Disposal of properties, plant and equipment

  249,940    3,496,758    3,074,468    948,725  

Loss (profit) sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

  56,925    796,398    (1,540,688  767,228  

Dividends received

  (42,880  (599,907        

Unrealized exchange loss (gain) for wells accruals

  356,160    4,982,817    (1,315,709  (665,134

Disposal of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  1,124,125    14,699,620   733,521   4,685,135  

Profit (loss) sharing in associates

  (54,044  (706,710 (4,797,607 810,753  

Dividends

  (69,905  (914,116 (685,704 (599,907

Effects of net present value of reserve for well abandonment

  (400,742  (5,240,305 3,552,924   6,598,215  

Gain on sale of properties, plant and equipment

  (58,731  (768,000  —      —    

Net (profit) loss on investments in equity instruments

  (21,324  (278,842  —      —    

Activities related to financing activities:

        

Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)

  4,961,785    69,417,356    (28,458,699  (18,449,352

Derivative financial instrument valuation effect

  170,013    2,378,555    1,895,731    (9,963,741

Amortization expenses related to debt issuance

  (144,588  (1,890,710 1,560,478   762,387  

Unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss)

  252,996    3,308,299   (40,561,801 69,417,356  

Interest expense

  2,489,603    34,830,543    39,703,900    49,417,938    3,005,693    39,303,943   45,738,584   34,830,543  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  71,328,882    997,919,581    739,032,042    568,065,257    4,898,331    64,053,017   162,521,003   142,108,549  

Funds (used in) provided by operating activities:

    

Funds provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Derivative financial instruments

  42,232    590,844    (1,907,617  826,910    140,725    1,840,184   1,919,393   3,380,190  

Accounts and notes receivable

  (2,413,890  (33,771,286  5,867,996    (9,102,301  413,034    5,401,035   22,597,978   (34,720,103

Inventories

  (259,721  (3,633,596  (2,069,852  28,276,324    (5,118  (66,930 (11,829,418 (5,750,281

Other assets

  (262,581  (3,673,619  (1,795,472  11,319,820    (986,955  (12,905,916 (7,678,603 (9,669,152

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  250,694    3,507,311    (1,988,703  3,620,326    373,126    4,879,180   1,362,781   6,759,771  

Taxes paid

  (61,671,660  (862,811,187  (650,028,049  (514,852,268  (205,816  (2,691,348 (21,789,616 13,204,559  

Suppliers

  703,249    9,838,731    (19,803,272  27,895,940    3,459,010    45,231,742   8,200,280   9,838,732  

Reserve for sundry creditors and others

  50,025    699,864    13,284,831    7,812,215  

Reserve for employee benefits

  4,978,552    69,651,934    85,164,131    81,117,391  

Provisions for sundry creditors

  626,146    8,187,800   (2,696,770 (5,927,517

Employee benefits

  5,968,198    78,043,140   61,583,267   50,952,857  

Deferred taxes

  (71,329  (997,927  282,641    (106,858  (125,063  (1,635,382 (859,954 (905,882
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash flows from operating activities

  12,674,453    177,320,650    166,038,676    204,872,756    14,555,618    190,336,522   213,330,341   169,271,723  

Investing activities:

        

Acquisition of property, pipelines, plant and equipment

  (12,569,311  (175,849,686  (184,584,476  (213,232,138

Acquisition of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  (18,783,891  (245,627,554 (197,508,998 (167,013,568

Exploration costs

  (295,573  (4,135,188  (6,343,062  (1,189,944  (110,021  (1,438,685 (1,828,043 (4,135,188

Available-for-sale investments (Note 9)

  (1,485,577  (20,783,820        

Dividends (Note 9)

  42,880    599,907          

Investments in equity instruments

  219,469    2,869,883    —     (20,783,820
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash flows from investing activities

  (14,307,581  (200,168,787  (190,927,538  (214,422,082  (18,674,443  (244,196,356 (199,337,041 (191,932,576
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flow to be obtained from financing activities

  (1,633,128  (22,848,137  (24,888,862  (9,549,326

Financing activities:

        

Increase in equity from the Mexican Government

          122    467,210    509,1814    66,583,100    —      —    

Decrease in equity Mexican Government contributions

  (4,970,749  (65,000,000  —      —    

Loans obtained from financial institutions

  13,558,799    189,693,018    235,881,933    160,177,586    18,120,677    236,955,033   377,896,149   189,693,019  

Debt payments, principal only

  (10,873,088  (152,118,845  (197,098,458  (99,607,497  (14,617,527  (191,146,091 (341,863,963 (152,118,845

Interest paid

  (2,386,000  (33,381,090  (38,722,581  (49,073,057  (2,839,682  (37,133,100 (46,589,066 (33,381,090
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash flows from financing activities

  299,711    4,193,083    61,016    11,964,242    784,533    10,258,942   (10,556,880 4,193,084  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (1,333,417  (18,655,054  (24,827,846  2,414,916  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (3,334,292  (43,600,892 3,436,420   (18,467,769

Effects of change in cash value

  154,969    2,168,086    (1,345,391  (1,535,857  390,907    5,111,720   821,924   2,247,961  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

  9,548,482    133,587,079    159,760,316    158,881,257    9,118,257    119,234,891   114,976,547   131,196,355  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

 U.S.  $8,370,034    Ps.  117,100,111    Ps.  133,587,079    Ps.  159,760,316  

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year (Note 5)

 U.S. $6,174,872   Ps.80,745,719   Ps.119,234,891   Ps.114,976,547  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

NOTE 1—APPROVAL:STRUCTURE AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS OF PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES:

Petróleos Mexicanos was created on June 7, 1938, and began operations on July 20, 1938 in accordance with a decree of the Mexican Congress stating that all foreign-owned oil companies in operation at that time in the United Mexican States (“Mexico”) were thereby nationalized. Petróleos Mexicanos and its four Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) are decentralized entities of the Federal Government of Mexico (the “Mexican Government”) and together comprise the Mexican oil and gas industry.

The operations of Petróleos Mexicanos and its Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) are regulated mainly by theConstitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, or the “Mexican Constitution”), theLey Reglamentaria del Artículo 27 Constitucional en el Ramo del Petróleo (Regulatory Law to Article 27 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States concerning Petroleum Affairs, or the “Regulatory Law”), theLey de Petróleos Mexicanos(Petróleos Mexicanos Law) and theReglamento de la Ley de Petróleos Mexicanos(Regulations to the Petróleos Mexicanos Law), which establish the state will be exclusively entrusted with the activities in the strategic areas of petroleum, hydrocarbons and basic petrochemicals through Petróleos Mexicanos and its Subsidiary Entities (as defined below).

The Petróleos Mexicanos Law, which was published in theDiario Oficial de la Federación(Official Gazette of the Federation) on November 28, 2008, establishes that the four Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) will continue carrying out their activities in accordance with their objectives, fulfilling the commitments they have already assumed in Mexico and abroad.

On March 16,21, 2012, the consolidated financial statements underPresident of Mexico issued theNormasDecreto que tiene por objeto establecer la estructura, el funcionamiento y el control de Información Financiera Mexicanaslos organismos subsidiarios de Petróleos Mexicanos(Mexican Financial Reporting Standards, (Decree to establish the structure, operation and control of the subsidiary entities of Petróleos Mexicanos, or “Mexican FRS” or “NIFs”the “Subsidiary Entities Decree”), which was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation and became effective as of the notes thereto were authorizedfollowing day.

Under the Subsidiary Entities Decree:

Petróleos Mexicanos continues to have the authority to direct the central planning and strategic management of the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) in accordance with the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, and to provide general corporate services of an administrative and technical nature, as requested by the following officers: Public Accountant Víctor M. Cámara Peón, Deputy DirectorSubsidiary Entities (as defined below);

the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) will continue to undertake all activities related to technical and industrial operations that are strictly productive and commercial in nature, in accordance with their purpose;

the organization continues to allocate the duties to each Subsidiary Entity (as defined below) in accordance with the rationale of Accounting, Fiscaldistributing core activities of a productive character as referred to in the Petróleos Mexicanos Law;

the activities related to petrochemical products, as opposed to basic petrochemicals, must be undertaken by the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below), and Financial Controlsuch products will continue to be manufactured by Pemex-Petrochemicals (as defined below), notwithstanding undertakings by the private sector; and C. Francisco J. Torres Suárez, Associate Managing Director of Accounting.

These consolidated financial statements and

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

the notes thereto were approvedactivities, operations or services required by the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) for carrying out their respective objectives may be undertaken by companies owned by Petróleos Mexicanos, the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) or both. With respect to any activities not reserved exclusively for the State, the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) may enter into alliances or partnerships with third parties.

In addition, on September 4, 2009, the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos (the “Board”) approved theEstatuto Orgánico (Organic Statute) of Petróleos Mexicanos, which became effective on September 25, 2009 and has since been modified on August 9, 2010, August 2, 2011, February 23, 2012, March 27, 2013 and September 30, 2013.

On March 28, 2013, the Organic Statutes of each Subsidiary Entity (as defined below) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. These Organic Statutes establish the structure, organizational basis and functions of the administrative units of each of the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below), and also delineate the duties and internal regulations of their respective Boards of Directors.

The Subsidiary Entities are decentralized entities of a technical, industrial and commercial nature with their own corporate identity and equity and with the legal authority to own property and conduct business in their own names and are grouped in accordance with the areas delineated by the Secretary of Energy. The Subsidiary Entities are controlled by and have the characteristics of subsidiaries of Petróleos Mexicanos. The Subsidiary Entities, of which Petróleos Mexicanos owns 100% of the equity, are:

Pemex-Exploración y Producción (“Pemex-Exploration and Production”);

Pemex-Refinación (“Pemex-Refining”);

Pemex-Gas y Petroquímica Básica (“Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals”); and

Pemex-Petroquímica (“Pemex-Petrochemicals”).

The principal objectives of the Subsidiary Entities are as follows:

I.Pemex-Exploration and Production explores for and produces crude oil and natural gas; additionally, this entity transports, stores and markets such products;

II.Pemex-Refining refines petroleum products and derivatives thereof that may be used as basic industrial raw materials; additionally, this entity stores, transports, distributes and markets such products and derivatives;

III.Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals processes natural gas, natural gas liquids and artificial gas, derivatives thereof that may be used as basic industrial raw materials, and stores, transports, distributes and markets such products; additionally, this entity stores, transports, distributes and markets basic petrochemicals; and

IV.Pemex-Petrochemicals processes industrial petrochemicals other than basic petrochemicals and stores, distributes and markets secondary petrochemicals.

For purposes of these consolidated financial statements, any capitalized name or term that is not defined herein will have the meaning attributed to it in the Regulatory Law or in the Petróleos Mexicanos Law.

On December 12, 2013, the Permanent Commission of the Mexican Congress approved amendments to Articles 25, 27 and 28 of the Mexican Constitution, which were subsequently approved by a majority of Mexico’s state legislatures and signed into law by President Peña Nieto. On December 20, 2013, these

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

amendments were published as theDecreto por el que se reforman y adicionan diversas disposiciones de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en Materia de Energía (Decree that amends and supplements various provisions of the Mexican Constitution relating to energy matters, or the “Energy Reform Decree”) in the Official Gazette of the Federation and took effect on December 21, 2013. The Energy Reform Decree includes transitional articles that set forth the general framework for the secondary legislation or implementing laws, which have not been enacted as of the date of these consolidated financial statements.

The key features of the Energy Reform Decree with respect to the hydrocarbons sector in Mexico and PEMEX’s operations are the following:

Ownership by Mexican Nation: Solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons located in the subsoil of Mexico remain the property of the Mexican nation.

Private Sector Participation: The Mexican Government will carry out the exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons in Mexico through assignments to “productive state-owned companies” (as described below) or through agreements with such productive state-owned companies or with private sector companies. As part of the secondary legislation to be adopted, the Mexican Congress must make the necessary adjustments to the legal framework regulating the contractual regime for exploration and extraction activities, which may include the creation of licenses, service contracts, profit-sharing contracts and production-sharing contracts.

Conversion: Petróleos Mexicanos will be converted from a decentralized public entity to a productive state-owned company within two years from the enactment of the Energy Reform Decree. During the two-year transition period, PEMEX will be entitled to be awarded the assignments and agreements mentioned above. As a productive state-owned company, Petróleos Mexicanos’ corporate purpose will be to create economic value and increase the income of the Mexican nation while adhering to principles of equity as well as social and environmental responsibility, and it will be granted technical, managerial and budgetary autonomy, subject to certain controls. The Mexican Government will continue to control Petróleos Mexicanos once it is converted to a productive state-owned company.

Round Zero: Pursuant to the Energy Reform Decree, PEMEX has requested that theSecretaría de Energía (Ministry of Energy) assign to it certain exploration and extraction areas in which it currently operates, based on its operational capabilities. Any such areas that it does not request or are not assigned to it will be subject to a bidding process that will be open to participation by private sector companies.

Booking of Reserves: Productive state-owned companies and private companies will be allowed to report assignments or contracts and the corresponding expected benefits for accounting and financial purposes, with the understanding that any solid, liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons that are in the subsoil will remain the property of the Mexican nation.

Pipeline System: TheCentro Nacional de Control del Gas Natural (National Center of Natural Gas Control), a decentralized public entity of the Mexican Government, will be created to own and operate the national gas pipeline system and storage infrastructure. Pursuant to the applicable secondary legislation, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals will transfer and assign to the National Center of Natural Gas Control the assets and contracts necessary for it to manage this system and infrastructure.

Regulatory Oversight and Authority: The Ministry of Energy, theComisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos (National Hydrocarbons Commission, or the “NHC”) and theComisión Reguladora deEnergía (Energy Regulatory Commission) will be granted additional technical and administrative authority over certain of PEMEX’s operations and the energy sector generally. In addition, the Ministry

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

of Energy will be granted the authority to issue permits for oil treatment and refining, and for natural gas processing, activities which are currently reserved to PEMEX.

As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, PEMEX does not know what the scope of the secondary legislation will be. Accordingly, it cannot currently predict what specific effects these developments may have, although they will likely result in significant changes to PEMEX’s structure and have a material effect on its results of operations and financial position.

The principal distinction between the Subsidiary Entities and the Subsidiary Companies (as defined below) is that the Subsidiary Entities are decentralized public entities created by the predecessor statute to theLey Orgánica de Petróleos Mexicanos y Organismos Subsidiarios(Organic Law of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities), whereas the Subsidiary Companies are companies that were formed in accordance with the applicable laws of each of the respective jurisdictions in which they were incorporated. In addition, unlike the Subsidiary Entities, the Subsidiary Companies are not decentralized entities and are managed as private corporations. The “Subsidiary Companies” are defined as those companies which are controlled by PEMEX (see Note 3(a)).

“Associates”, as used herein, means those companies in which Petróleos Mexicanos does not have effective control (see Note 3(a)).

Petróleos Mexicanos, the Subsidiary Entities and the Subsidiary Companies are referred to collectively herein as “PEMEX”.

PEMEX’s address and its principal place of business is:

Av. Marina Nacional No. 329

Col. Petróleos Mexicanos

Delegación Miguel Hidalgo

México, D.F. 11311

México

NOTE 2—BASIS OF PREPARATION:

(a)Statement of compliance

PEMEX prepared its consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

The consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2013 were approved by the Board on May 14, 2014 pursuant to the terms of Article 104 Fraction III, paragraph a, of the MexicanLey del Mercado de Valores (Securities Market Law), and of Article 33 Fraction I, paragraph a, section 3 and Article 78 of the general provisions applicable to Mexican securities issuers and other participants in the Mexican securities market.

Petróleos Mexicanos, the Subsidiary Entities (as defined below) and the Subsidiary Companies (as defined below) are referred to collectively herein as “PEMEX.”

(b)Basis of measurement

These consolidated financial statements consist of those Mexican FRS consolidated financial statements and notes described above, as supplemented byhave been prepared using the accompanying disclosures under accounting principles generally accepted inhistorical cost basis method, except where it is indicated that certain items have been measured using the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) presented in Notes 21, 22 and 23. The final consolidated financial statements were authorized for issuance herein by Public Accountant Víctor M. Cámara Peón, Deputy Director of Financial Information Systems, and C. Francisco J. Torres Suárez, Associate Managing Director of Accounting, on April 30, 2012, as updated to consider subsequent events, including those related to Notes 17 and 20, through such date.

NOTE 2—STRUCTURE AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS OF PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS,

                  SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES:

Petróleos Mexicanos was created on June 7, 1938, and began operations on July 20, 1938 in accordance with a decree of the Mexican Congress stating that all foreign-owned oil companies in operation at that time in the United Mexican States (“Mexico”) were thereby nationalized. Petróleos Mexicanos and its four Subsidiary Entities are decentralized public entities of the Federal Government of Mexico (the “Mexican Government”) and together comprise the Mexican oil and gas industry.

The operations of Petróleos Mexicanos and its Subsidiary Entities are regulated mainly by theConstitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Political Constitution of the United Mexican States,fair value model, amortized cost or the “Mexican Constitution”), theLey Reglamentaria del Artículo 27 Constitucional en el Ramo del Petróleo (Regulatory Law to Article 27 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States concerning Petroleum Affairs, or the “Regulatory Law”), and theLey de Petróleos Mexicanos(Petróleos Mexicanos Law) and theReglamento de la Ley de Petróleos Mexicanos(Regulations to the Petróleos Mexicanos Law), which establishes the State will be exclusively entrusted with the activities in the strategic areas of petroleum, hydrocarbons and basic petrochemicals through Petróleos Mexicanos and its Subsidiary Entities, with Petróleos Mexicanos (Corporate) responsible for the central conduction and strategic direction of such activities.

The Petróleos Mexicanos Law, which was published in theDiario Oficial de la Federación(Official Gazette of the Federation) on November 28, 2008, establishes that the four Subsidiary Entities, as created by theLey Orgánica de Petróleos Mexicanos y Organismos Subsidiarios (Organic Law of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities), which preceded the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, will continue carrying out their activities inpresent

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

accordance with their objectives, fulfillingvalue. The principal items measured at fair value are derivative financial instruments. The principal items measured at amortized cost are loans held to maturity, while the commitments they have already assumed in Mexico and abroad, unless and untilprincipal item measured at present value is the Mexican Government issues a decree or decrees of reorganization based on a proposal by the Board.

The Subsidiary Entities are decentralized public entities of a technical, industrial and commercial nature with their own corporate identity and equity and with the legal authority to own property and conduct business in their own names. The Subsidiary Entities are controlled by and have the characteristics of subsidiaries of Petróleos Mexicanos. The Subsidiary Entities are:provision for employee benefits.

 

(c)Functional and reporting currency and translation of financial statements of foreign operations

Pemex-Exploración y Producción (“Pemex-ExplorationThese consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos, which is both PEMEX’s functional currency and Production”);

Pemex-Refinación (“Pemex-Refining”);

Pemex-Gas y Petroquímica Básica (“Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals”); and

Pemex-Petroquímica (“Pemex-Petrochemicals”).

The strategic activities entrustedreporting currency, due to Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities can be performed only by Petróleos Mexicanos and these Entities and cannot be delegated or subcontracted, with the exception of those performed by Pemex-Petrochemicals.

The principal objectives of the Subsidiary Entities are as follows:following:

 

 I.(i)Pemex-Exploration and Production explores for and produces crude oil and natural gas; additionally, this entity transports, stores and markets such products;the economic environment in which PEMEX operates is Mexico, where the legal currency is the Mexican peso;

 

 II.(ii)Pemex-Refining refines petroleum productsPEMEX is an entity owned and derivatives thereof that may be used as basic industrial raw materials; additionally, this entity stores, transports, distributesregulated by the Mexican Government; accordingly, PEMEX’s budget is subject to legislative approval and markets such products and derivatives;is included in the Mexican annual budget, which is published in pesos;

 

 III.(iii)Pemex-Gasbenefits to employees were approximately 50% and Basic Petrochemicals processes natural gas, natural gas liquids56% of PEMEX’s total liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and derivatives thereof that may be used as basic industrial raw materials,2012, respectively. The reserve maintained to meet these obligations is computed, denominated and stores, transports, distributes and markets such products; additionally, this entity stores, transports, distributes and markets basic petrochemicals;payable in Mexican pesos; and

 

 IV.(iv)Pemex-Petrochemicals engagescash flows for payment of general expenses, taxes and duties are realized in industrial petrochemical processing and stores, distributes and markets secondary petrochemicals.Mexican pesos.

Petróleos Mexicanos assignedAlthough the prices of several products are based on international U.S. dollar-indices, domestic selling prices are governed by the economic and financial policies established by the Mexican Government. Accordingly, cash flows from domestic sales are generated and recorded in Mexican pesos.

Mexico’s monetary policy regulator, theBanco de México, requires that Government entities other than financial entities sell their foreign currency to the Subsidiary Entities allBanco de México in accordance with its terms, receiving Mexican pesos in exchange, which is the legal currency in Mexico.

Translation of financial statements of foreign operations

The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries and associates are translated into the reporting currency by identifying if the functional currency is different from the currency for recording the foreign operations. If the currencies for a foreign transaction are different, then the currency for recording the foreign transaction is first translated into the functional currency and then translated into the reporting currency using the year-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities needed to carry out these activities; these assets and liabilities were incorporated into the Subsidiary Entities’ initial capital contribution. Additionally, Petróleos Mexicanos assigned to the Subsidiary Entities all the personnel needed for their operations, and the Subsidiary Entities assumed all the related labor liabilities. There were no changesreported in the carrying valueconsolidated statements of assets and liabilities upon their contribution by Petróleos Mexicanos tofinancial position, the Subsidiary Entities.

For purposes of these consolidated financial statements, any capitalized name or term that is not defined herein, will have the meaning attributed to it in the Regulatory Law or in the Petróleos Mexicanos Law.

In September 2009, new regulations to the Regulations to the Petróleos Mexicanos Law and to theReglamento de la Ley Reglamentaria del Artículo 27 Constitucional en el Ramo del Petróleo(Regulations to the Regulatory Law, or the “Regulations”) were published. They regulate the application of the Petróleos Mexicanos Law and the oversight of Petróleos Mexicanos and its Subsidiary Entities, as well as their relationship with the Mexican Government, respectively.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

In addition, on September 4, 2009, the Board approved theEstatuto Orgánico de Petróleos Mexicanos (Organic Statute of Petróleos Mexicanos), which establishes the structure, organizational basis and functions of the administrative units of Petróleos Mexicanos, and also delineates the internal regulations and powers of the Board. The Organic Statute of Petróleos Mexicanos became effective as of September 25, 2009 and was amended effective August 10, 2010, August 3, 2011 and February 24, 2012.

The principal distinction between the Subsidiary Entities and the Subsidiary Companies (as defined below) is that the Subsidiary Entities are decentralized public entities created by the predecessor statute to the Organic Law of Petróleos Mexicanos, whereas the Subsidiary Companies are companies that have been formed in accordance with the applicable laws of each of the respective jurisdictions in which they have been incorporated, and are managed as private corporations.

The “Subsidiary Companies” are defined as those companies which are not the Subsidiary Entities but in which Petróleos Mexicanos has more than a 50% ownership investment and/or effective control (see Note 3(b)).

“Non-consolidated subsidiary companies and affiliates,” as used herein, means (a) those subsidiary companies which are not Subsidiary Entities or Subsidiary Companies, as defined above in this note and (b) those companies in which PEMEX has 50% or less ownership investment or does not have effective control (see Note 3(k)).

NOTE 3—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions made by PEMEX’s management that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as ofhistorical exchange rate at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well astransaction for equity items and the recorded amounts ofweighted average exchange rate for income and expenses duringreported in the year. The important items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying valuestatement of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment, the valuationcomprehensive income of the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, impairment, work in progress, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the valuation of financial instruments and liabilities related to employee benefits. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.period.

(d)Terms definition

References in these consolidated financial statements and the related notes to “pesos” or “Ps.” refers to Mexican pesos, “U.S. dollars” or “U.S. $” refers to dollars of the United States of America, “yen” or “¥” referrefers to Japanese yen, “euro” or “€” refers to the legal currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union, “Pounds sterling” or “£” refers to the legal currency of the United Kingdom, “Swiss francs” or “CHF” refers to the legal currency of the Swiss Confederation, “Canadian dollars” or “CAD” refers to the legal currency of Canada and “Australian dollars” or “AUD” refers to the legal currency of Australia. Figures in all currencies are presented in thousands of the relevant currency unit, except exchange rates and product and share prices.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(e)Convenience translations

These consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos (reporting currency), which is the same as the recording currency and the functional currency of PEMEX. The U.S. dollar amounts shown in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position, the consolidated statements of operations,comprehensive income, the consolidated statements of changes in equity (deficit) and the consolidated statements of cash flows have been included solely for the convenience of the reader and are unaudited. Such amounts have been translated from amounts in pesos, as a matter of arithmetic computation only, at the exchange rate for the settlement of obligations in foreign currencies provided byBanco de México(the Mexican central bank) and theSecretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, or the “SHCP”) SHCP at December 31, 20112013 of Ps. 13.990413.0765 per U.S. dollar. Translations herein should not be construed as a representation that the peso amounts have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the foregoing or any other rate.

Because PEMEX is an industrial entity, andNOTE 3—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with FRS B-3 “StatementIFRS requires the use of Operations,” PEMEX classifies ordinary costsestimates and assumptions made by PEMEX’s management that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of these consolidated financial statements, as well as the recorded amounts of income and expenses basedduring the year.

Significant estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on their functionan ongoing basis, and revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in order to present its gross income margin.the period in which any estimates are revised and in any future periods affected by such revision.

In particular, information about assumptions, estimation uncertainties and critical accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements are described in the following notes:

Note 3(d) Financial instruments

Note 3(h) Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment; Successful efforts method of accounting

Note 3(j) Impairment of non-financial assets

Note 3(l) Provisions

Note 3(m) Employee benefits

Note 3(n) Taxes and Federal Duties; Deferred Taxes

Note 3(p) Contingencies

Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Below is a summary of the principal accounting policies followed by PEMEX in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:

 

(a)EffectsBasis of inflation on the financial informationconsolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS in effect as of the statement of financial position date, and include the recognition of the effects of inflation on the financial information through December 31, 2007, based on the Mexican National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) determined by theInstituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía(National Institute of Statistics and Geography, or “INEGI”) and published byBanco de México. Cumulative inflation for the last three years, including the reporting year, and the indices used in calculating inflation, are as follows:

December 31,

  NCPI(1)   Inflation 
    For the year  3-year
accumulated
 

2011

   103.551     3.82  12.26

2010

   99.742     4.40  15.19

2009

   95.536     3.57  14.48

(1)In 2011, the base year for the calculation of NCPI was changed to 2010 by INEGI, which recalculated the NCPI figures for 2011 and prior years to reflect the change in base year. This change did not affect previously reported inflation.

(b)Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include those of Petróleos Mexicanos, the Subsidiary Entities and the Subsidiary Companies.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Investment in subsidiaries

The Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies are those controlled by Petróleos Mexicanos. Control requires exposure or rights to variable returns and the ability to affect those returns through power over a company. The Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies are consolidated from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.

The consolidated Subsidiary Entities are Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and Pemex-Petrochemicals.

The consolidated Subsidiary Companies are companies that are 100% owned by Petróleos Mexicanos (with the exception of Pemex Finance, Ltd. (“FIN”) and P.M.I. Comercio Internacional, S.A. de C.V. (“PMI CIM”)), and are as follows: PMI CIM(i); P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. (“PMI Trading”)(i); P.M.I. Holdings North America, Inc. (“PMI HNA”)(i); P.M.I. Holdings Petróleos España, S.L. (“PMI HPE”)(i); P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. (“PMI HBV”)(i); P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. (“PMI NASA”)(i); Kot Insurance Company, AG (“KOT”); Pemex Procurement International, Inc. (“PPI”)(ii); P.M.I. Marine, Ltd. (“PMI Mar”)(i); P.M.I. Services, B.V. (“PMI SHO”)(i); Pemex Internacional España, S.A. (“PMI SES”)(i); Pemex Services Europe, Ltd. (“PMI SUK”)(i)(iii); P.M.I. Services North America, Inc. (“PMI SUS”)(i); P.M.I. Field Management Resources, S.L. (“FMR”)(i)(iv); P.M.I. Campos Maduros, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“SANMA”)(iv); Mex Gas International, Ltd. (“MGAS”); FIN; Instalaciones Inmobiliarias para Industrias, S. A. de C. V. (“III”)(iv); III Servicios, S. A. de C. V. (“III Services”)(iv); PPQ Cadena Productiva, S.L. (“PPQCP”)(iv) and Hijos de J. Barreras, S. A. (“HJ BARRERAS”)(iv).

(i)Member company of the “PMI Group”.
(ii)Formerly Integrated Trade Systems, Inc. (“ITS”).
(iii)As of December 2013, PMI SUK is no longer included in the consolidated financial statements of PEMEX due to its liquidation, which did not have an impact on these consolidated financial statements.
(iv)As of 2013, these companies are included in the consolidated financial statements of PEMEX.

The financial information of the Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies has been prepared based on the same period of Petróleos Mexicanos’ financial statements applying the same accounting policies.

Investments in associates and joint ventures

Investments in associates are those in which PEMEX has significant influence but not the power to control financial and operational decisions. There is significant influence when PEMEX owns directly or indirectly between 20% and 50% of voting rights in another entity.

Joint ventures are those arrangements whereby two or more parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. A joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement.

Investments in associates and joint ventures are recognized based on the equity method and recorded initially at cost, including Special Purpose Entities. any goodwill identified on acquisition. With respect to joint operations, the assets, liabilities, income and expenses are recognized in relation to participation in the arrangement and in accordance with the applicable IFRS. The investment cost includes transaction costs.

The consolidated financial statements include the proportion of gains, losses and other comprehensive income corresponding to PEMEX’s share in each investee, once these items are adjusted to align with the accounting policies of PEMEX, from the date that significant influence and joint control begins to the date that such influence or joint control ceases.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

When the value of the share of losses exceeds the value of PEMEX’s investment in an associate or joint venture, the carrying value of the investment, including any long-term investment, is reduced to zero and PEMEX ceases to recognize additional losses, except in cases where PEMEX is jointly liable for obligations incurred by those associates and joint ventures.

Eliminated transactions in consolidation

All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation,preparation of the consolidated financial statements pursuant to IFRS 10, “Consolidated Financial Statements” (“IFRS 10”).

Unrealized gains arising from transactions with entities whose investment is accounted for using the equity method are eliminated against the investment to the extent of participation in such entities. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

Non-controlling interests

The interests of third parties who do not have a controlling interest in the equity or comprehensive result of subsidiaries of PEMEX are presented in the consolidated statements of financial position, the consolidated statements of changes in equity (deficit) as “non-controlling interests”, and as net income and comprehensive income for the period, attributable to non-controlling interests, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Dividends paid in cash and assets other than cash

A liability for distributions of dividends in cash and non-cash assets to third parties is recognized when the distribution is authorized by the Board. The corresponding amount is recognized directly in equity.

Distributions of non-cash assets are measured at the fair value of the assets to be distributed. Changes relating to re-measurements of the fair value between the date on which the distribution is declared and the consolidation has been made basedtime when the assets are transferred are recognized directly in equity.

When distributing non-cash assets, any difference between the dividend paid and the carrying amount of the assets distributed is recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

(b)Transactions in foreign currency

In accordance with IAS 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates” (“IAS 21”), transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.

Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items or on translating monetary items at rates different from those at which they were translated on initial recognition during the period or in previous financial statements are recognized in profit or loss in the period in which they arise. When a gain or loss on anon-monetary item is recognized in other comprehensive results, any exchange component of that gain or loss is recognized in other comprehensive results. Conversely, when a gain or loss on a non-monetary item is recognized in profit or loss, any exchange component of that gain or loss shall be recognized in profit or loss for the Subsidiary Entities and the Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.year.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The consolidated Subsidiary Companies are as follows: P.M.I. Comercio Internacional, S.A. de C.V. (“PMI CIM”)(3); P.M.I. Trading, Ltd. (“PMI Trading”)(3); P.M.I. Holdings North America, Inc. (“PMI HNA”)(3); P.M.I. Holdings Petróleos España, S.L. (“PMI HPE”)(3); P.M.I. Holdings, B.V. (“PMI HBV”)(3); P.M.I. Norteamérica, S.A. de C.V. (“PMI NASA”)(3); Kot Insurance Company, AG (“KOT”); Integrated Trade Systems, Inc. (“ITS”); P.M.I. Marine, Ltd. (“PMI Mar”)(3); P.M.I. Services, B.V. (“PMI-SHO”)(3); Pemex Internacional España, S.A. (“PMI-SES”)(3); Pemex Services Europe, Ltd. (“PMI-SUK”)(3); P.M.I. Services North America, Inc. (“PMI-SUS”)(3); Mex Gas International, Ltd. (“MGAS”); Pemex Finance, Ltd.; the Master Trust(1); Fideicomiso F/163(1) and RepCon Lux(2).

 

(1)(c)Fair value measurement

PEMEX measures certain financial instruments such as derivative financial instruments at fair value as of the closing date of the relevant reporting period, and the fair value of such instruments is disclosed in Note 13. The financial instruments valued at amortized cost are disclosed in Note 12.

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A measurement at fair value assumes that the sale of the asset or transfer of a liability occurs:

i.in the principal function of the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 (the “Trusts”) consisted of issuing bonds and entering into other financingsmarket for the purpose of funding PIDIREGAS. During 2009, the Trusts transferred all of the rights and obligations derived from PIDIREGAS financings to PEMEX, which recognized them as direct public debt, while the Trusts ceased to act as financing vehicles. The Assumption and Termination Agreement for the Fideicomiso F/163 was executed on August 16, 2011. The Assumption and Termination Agreement of the Master Trust became effective on December 20, 2011, and the State of Delaware issued the cancellation certificate on the same day. These trusts are no longer included in the financial statements of PEMEX as of December 31, 2011.
(2)The financial information of RepCon Lux was consolidated in the financial statements of PEMEX until July 28, 2009, when RepCon Lux was formally liquidated.
(3)Member company of the “PMI Group.”asset or liability; or

 

(c)Translationii.in the absence of foreign currency financial statementsa principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.

The financial statementsprincipal market or the most advantageous market must be accessible for PEMEX.

The fair value of consolidated foreign subsidiaries are translated into the reporting currencyan asset or liability is measured based on by initially determining if the functional currency and the currency for recording the foreign operations are different and then translating the functional currency to the reporting currency, using the historical exchange rate and/same assumptions that market participants would make when pricing the asset or liability under the exchange rate at year-endpremise that market participants take into account highest and the inflation indexbest use of the country of origin, depending on whether the information comes from a non-inflationaryasset or an inflationary economic environment.liability.

 

(d)Cumulative currency translation effectFinancial instruments

This representsFinancial instruments are classified as: (i) financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss; (ii) financial instruments held to maturity; (iii) available for sale financial assets; (iv) investments in equity instruments; (v) loans held to maturity; or (vi) derivative financial instruments. PEMEX determines the difference resultingclassification of its financial instruments at the time of initial recognition.

PEMEX’s financial instruments include cash and short-term deposits, equity investments, accounts receivable, other receivables, loans, accounts payable to suppliers, other accounts payable, borrowings and debts, as well as derivatives.

Financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss

A financial instrument is measured at fair value through profit or loss if it is classified as held for trading or designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial assets are designated at fair value through profit or loss if PEMEX manages such investments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with PEMEX’s documented risk management or investment strategy. In addition, directly attributable transaction costs are recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the period. These financial instruments are recognized at fair value and corresponding changes relating to dividend income are recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Held-to-maturity financial instruments

Financial instruments that are intended to be and are capable of being held to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value in addition to any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to their initial recognition, held-to-maturity financial instruments are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method (“EIR method”), less any impairment losses.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Available-for-sale financial assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial instruments that are designated as available-for-sale or are not classified in any of the previous categories. PEMEX’s investments in certain equity securities and debt securities are classified as available-for-sale financial assets. Available-for-sale financial assets are recognized initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs.

Subsequent to initial recognition, available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value. In addition, any gains or losses associated with such instruments, as well as foreign exchange differences are recognized in other comprehensive result and presented in the fair value reserve in equity. When an investment is derecognized, any gains or losses accumulated in the equity are reclassified to profit or loss.

Sales and purchases of financial assets that require the delivery of such assets within a period of time established by market practice are recognized as of the negotiation date (the date on which PEMEX commits to purchase or sell the asset).

Investments in equity instruments

Certain investments in equity instruments are designated irrevocably as investments in equity instruments upon initial recognition, as required under IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments” (“IFRS 9”). These investments are valued at fair value and changes in their fair value are recognized in other comprehensive results. Dividends arising from these investments are recognized in results of the period when the shareholder’s right to receive payment of the dividend is established.

Loans held to maturity

After initial recognition, loans and debt securities that bear interest are measured at amortized cost using the EIR method, less impairment losses.

The amortized cost is calculated based on any discount or premium on acquisition and fees and costs that are an integral part of the EIR method. Amortization of costs is included under the heading of financing cost—net in the statement of comprehensive income.

Derivative financial instruments

Derivative financial instruments (“DFIs”) presented in the consolidated statement of financial position are carried at fair value. In the case of DFIs held for trading, changes in fair value are recorded in profit or loss; in the case of DFIs formally designated as and that qualify for hedging, changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of comprehensive income using cash flow or fair value hedge accounting, with gains or losses classified in accordance with the earnings treatment of the hedge transaction.

Embedded derivatives

PEMEX evaluates the potential existence of embedded derivatives, which may be found in the terms of its contracts, or combined with other host contracts, which could be structured financial instruments (debt or equity instruments with embedded derivatives). Embedded derivatives have terms that implicitly or explicitly meet the characteristics of a DFI. In some instances, these embedded derivatives must be segregated from the translationunderlying contracts and measured, recognized, presented and disclosed as DFIs, such as when the economic risks and terms of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to the underlying contract.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Impairment of financial assets measured at amortized cost

At each reporting date, PEMEX evaluates whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired in which case the value of the recoverable amount of the asset is calculated. A financial asset is impaired if objective evidence indicates that a loss event has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset, and that the loss event had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of the financial statements of consolidated foreign subsidiaries into the reporting currency.asset.

 

(e)Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consistare comprised of checkingcash balances on hand, deposits in bank accounts, foreign currency reserves and other highly liquid instruments as well as restrictedwith maturities of three months or less from the acquisition date that are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in their fair value, which are used in the management of PEMEX’s short-term commitments.

With respect to the consolidated statement of cash flows, the cash and cash equivalents which areline item consists of the cash and cash equivalents described above, net of bank overdrafts pending payment.

Cash subject to restrictions or that have certain limits on their use. Ascannot be exchanged or used to settle a liability within twelve months is not considered part of the date of these consolidated financial statements, earned interest incomethis line item and foreign exchange gains or losses are includedis presented in the results of operations, under comprehensive financing result (“CFR”).non-current assets.

 

(f)Accounts, notes receivable and other

Accounts, notes receivable at December 31, 2011 and 2010other are reportedrecognized at realizable value, net of allowance for doubtful accounts.value. The realizable value, if any, of a long-term account receivable is determined by considering its present value. In addition, interest income from accounts receivable is recognized on an accrued basis, provided that the amount can be reliably measured and collection is probable.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(g)Inventories and cost of sales

PEMEX’s inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined based on the cost of production or acquisition of inventory and other costs incurred in transporting such inventory to its present location and in its present condition, using the average cost formula (see Note 7). PEMEX includes fixed and indirect costs of production in the calculation of production cost.formula. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessaryselling costs. The estimate takes into consideration, among other things, the decrease in the value of inventories due to make the sale (see Note 3(ab)(i)).obsolescence.

Cost of sales represents the cost of production or acquisition of inventories at the time of sale, increased, where appropriate, by declines in net realizable value of inventories during the year.

PEMEX records the necessary allowance for inventory impairment arising from obsolescence and other factors that may indicate that the realization value of inventory may be lower than the recorded value.

Advances to suppliers are recognized as part of inventory when the risks and benefits of the ownership of the inventory have been transferred to PEMEX.

 

(h)Investment securities

Investment securities include both debt and equity securities and are classified as held-to-maturity securities, trading securities or available-for-sale securities. The classification of a particular investment is based on the intent of PEMEX’s management as to the length of time it will hold each investment. Each type of security is initially recorded at its acquisition cost and accounted for as follows:

(i)Held-to-maturity investments are those investments that the company has the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are recorded at amortized cost. The amortization of premiums or discounts is included in the effective interest rate, which is used to record the interest income derived from these instruments. Any losses on the book value attributable to a decline in credit quality of the issuer are recorded in the statement of operations.

(ii)Trading securities are those instruments that are bought and held by the company for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Trading securities are recorded at fair market value, which corresponds to the price an entity would realize if it were to sell an asset, or the price it would pay to relieve a liability, in a current arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. Any gains or losses due to changes in fair market value of a trading instrument are recorded as gains or losses in the statement of operations.

(iii)Available-for-sale securities are those debt or equity investments that are not classified as held-to-maturity or trading securities. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair market value. Any changes in the fair market value of these instruments are recognized in the comprehensive result component of equity. Interest income realized from debt instruments categorized as available-for-sale is recorded in the statement of operations.

(i)Derivative financial instruments and hedging operations

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the derivative financial instruments (“DFIs”) for trading and hedging purposes which were recognized in the statement of financial position were recorded at their fair value, in accordance with the provisions of Bulletin C-10, “Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities” (see Note 12). Changes in the fair value of DFIs held for trading purposes are recorded in the CFR. DFIs that are formally designated and that qualify as hedges are recorded using cash flow or fair value hedge accounting.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(j)Financial instruments with characteristics of liability, equity or both

Financial instruments entered into by PEMEX with characteristics of liability, equity or both, are recorded at the time they are created as a liability at fair value, as equity or as both, depending on their components.

Initial costs incurred in connection with these instruments are assigned to liabilities and equity in the same proportion as the amounts of their components. Gains or losses related to the components of financial instruments classified as liabilities are recorded in the CFR. The distribution of profits to the owners of the components of financial instruments classified as equity is recorded in equity.

(k)Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiary companies, affiliates and others

Investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiary companies are valued by the equity method, based on the financial statements of the issuing companies as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. Certain non-consolidated subsidiary companies and affiliates were recorded at their acquisition cost, and based on their insignificance relative to the total assets and revenues of PEMEX, have been neither consolidated nor valued by the equity method (see Note 9).

(l)Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

InvestmentsWells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment are measured at acquisition or construction cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

PEMEX uses the successful efforts method for the exploration and production of crude oil and gas activities, considering the criteria mentioned in IFRS 6, “Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources” in relation to the recognition of exploration and drilling assets. Costs of development wells and related plant, property and equipment involved in the exploitation of oil and gas are recorded as part of the cost of assets. The costs of exploratory wells in areas that have not yet been designated as containing proved reserves are recorded as intangible assets until it is determined whether they are commercially viable. Otherwise, the costs of drilling the exploratory well are charged to exploration expense. Other expenditures on exploration are recognized as exploration expenses as they are incurred.

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost, which includes their original purchase price or construction cost, any costs attributable to bringing the assets to a working condition for their intended use and the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located, including the estimated cost of plugging and abandoning wells, in accordance with IAS 16, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“IAS 16”).

The cost of financing projects that require large investments or financing incurred for projects, net of interest revenues from the temporary investment of these funds, is recognized as part of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment when the cost is directly attributable to the construction or acquisition of a qualifying asset. The capitalization of these costs is suspended during periods in which the development of construction is interrupted, and its capitalization ends when the activities necessary for the use of the qualifying asset are substantially completed. All other financing costs are recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income in the period in which they are incurred.

The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labor, any other costs directly attributable to the commissioning and interest on financing. In some cases the cost also includes the cost of dismantling and removal.

Expenditures related to the construction of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment during the stage prior to commissioning are stated at cost as intangible assets or construction in progress, in accordance with the characteristics of the asset. Once the assets are ready for use, the costs are transferred to the respective component of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment and depreciation or amortization begins.

The costs of major maintenance or replacement of a component of an item of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment are recorded at the cost of acquisition or construction, using—recognized in the case of wells—the successful efforts method. See Notes 3(m) and 10.

In accordance with the FRS D-6, “Capitalization of Comprehensive Financing Result,” during the construction period, the CFR associated with acquisitions of fixed assets is capitalized as partcarrying amount of the valueitem if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the component will flow to PEMEX and its cost can be measured reliably. The costs of assets.recurring maintenance, repairs and renovations of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.

Depreciation is calculated from the month following the date when the asset was placed in service, using the straight-line method of accounting based on the expected useful lives of the assets, based on appraisals prepared by independent appraisers.

Theand amortization of capitalized costs in wells isare determined based on the estimated commercial life of the field into which they are located,the wells belong, considering the ratio ofrelationship between the production of barrels of crude oil equivalent for the period toand proved developed reserves of the field, as determined atof the beginning of the year; these estimates are updatedyear, with quarterly to reflectupdates for new development investments.

In 2011, due toDepreciation of other elements of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment is recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the particular characteristicsestimated useful life of the Burgos fields, the amortization guidelines for those fields were modified to adjust total reserves by a factor corresponding to the probability of successasset, beginning as of the wells.

The annual depreciation rates used by PEMEX are as follows:

   %  Years

Plants and drilling equipment

  3-5  33-20

Offshore platforms and pipelines

  4  25

Buildings

  3  33

Furniture, fixtures, software and computers

  10-25  10-4

Transportation equipment

  4-20  25-5

The gainsdate that the asset is available for use, or losses generated byin the sale or disposalcase of fixed assets are recognized in incomeconstruction, from the date that the asset is completed and ready for the period in which they are incurred.use.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

Minor repairsWhen parts of an item of wells, pipelines, properties and maintenance costsequipment have different useful lives than such item and a cost that is significant relative to the total cost of the item, the part is depreciated separately. Useful lives of items of properties, plant and equipment are expensedreviewed if expectations differ from previous estimates.

Pipelines, properties, and equipment received from customers are initially recognized at fair value as incurred.revenue from ordinary operating activities if PEMEX has no future obligations to the customer who transferred the item. In contrast, if PEMEX does have future obligations to such a customer, the initial recognition is as a deferred liability relating to the period in which the items will provide PEMEX with a service.

The capitalized value of finance leases is also included in the line item of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment. Properties, plant and equipment acquired through financial leases are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the asset.

Advance payments for the acquisition of pipelines, properties, plant and equipment are also recognized in the line item of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment when the risks and benefits of the ownership have been transferred to PEMEX.

(i)Crude oil and natural gas reserves

Under the Mexican Constitution and the Regulatory Law, all oil and other hydrocarbon reserves within Mexico are owned by the Mexican nation and not by PEMEX. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, under the Petróleos Mexicanos Law, Pemex-Exploration and Production has the right to extract these reserves and to sell the resulting production, but the reserves are not registered for accounting purposes since they are not owned by PEMEX. Pemex-Exploration and Production estimates total proved oil and natural gas reserve volumes in accordance with Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the SEC, as amended (“Rule 4-10(a)”), and where necessary, in accordance with theStandards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (the “SPE”) as of February 19, 2007. These procedures are consistent with international reserves reporting practice. The estimation of these reserves depends on assumptions made and the interpretation of the data available, and may vary among analysts. The results of drilling activities, test wells and production after the date of estimation are utilized in future revisions of reserves estimates. Although PEMEX does not own the oil and other hydrocarbon reserves within Mexico, these accounting procedures allow PEMEX to record the effects that such oil and other hydrocarbon reserves have on its consolidated financial statements, including, for example, in the depreciation and amortization line item.

(j)Impairment of non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of PEMEX’s non-financial assets, other than inventories and deferred taxes, are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. If the net carrying value of thesethe asset exceeds the recoverable amount, PEMEX records an impairment charge in its statement of comprehensive income.

A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets which can generate cash inflows independently from other assets or groups of assets.

The recoverable amount is subjectdefined as the higher of the fair value minus the cost of disposal and the use value. Value in use is the discounted present value of the future cash flows expected to arise from the continuing use of an annualasset, and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. In measuring value in use, the discount rate

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

applied is the pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Fair value is calculated using discounted cash flows determined by the assumptions that market participants would apply in order to estimate the price of an asset or cash generating unit if such participants were acting in their best economic interest.

In the case of cash-generating assets or items dedicated to the exploration and evaluation of hydrocarbons reserves, the recoverable amount is determined by adjusting the fair value, which is based on the proved and probable reserves, for the risk factor associated with such reserves.

Impairment losses are recognized in the statement of comprehensive income. If an impairment assessmentloss subsequently improves, and such improvement is greater than the carrying value of the asset and appears to be permanent, the impairment loss recorded previously is reversed only up to the carrying amount of the item, as though no impairment had been recognized.

(k)Leases

The determination of whether an agreement is or contains a lease is based on the content of the agreement at the date of execution. An agreement contains a lease if performance under the agreement depends upon the use of a specific asset or assets, or if the agreement grants the right to use the asset.

Finance leases, which transfer to PEMEX substantially all the inherent benefits and risks of the leased property, are capitalized at the date the lease commences, and the value is recorded as the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Payments on the lease are divided between the financial costs and the amortization of the remaining debt principal in order to achieve a constant interest rate for the outstanding liability. The financing costs are recognized in the statement of comprehensive income.

Operating lease payments that do not transfer to PEMEX substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased asset are recognized as expenses in the statement of comprehensive income on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. Operating lease payments that do transfer to PEMEX substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership are instead capitalized and treated as under the paragraph above (see Notes 3(o) and 10)Note 10(e)).

 

(m)(l)Exploration and drilling costsProvisions

PEMEX usesrecognizes provisions where, as a result of a past event, PEMEX has incurred a legal or contractual obligation for which the successful efforts methodtransfer of accounting foran asset is probable and the recordingamount of oil and gas exploration and drilling costs insuch transfer is reasonably estimable. In certain cases, such amounts are recorded at their present value.

Environmental liabilities

In accordance with applicable legal requirements and accounting practices, an environmental liability is recognized when the Accounting Standard Codification 932 (ASC 932) “Extractive Activities—Oilcash outflows are probable and Gas” issued by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board, inamount is reasonably estimable. Disbursements related to the absence of local rules in the industry.

Exploration costs are charged to income when incurred, while expenditures for exploratory drilling costs are included in fixed assets while pending determination of proven reserves. Exploration wells more than 12 months old are expensed unless (a) (i) they are in an area requiring major capital expenditure before production can begin, (ii) commercially productive quantities of reserves have been found and (iii) they are subject to further exploration or appraisal activity, in that either drilling of additional exploratory wells is underway or firmly planned for the near future, or (b) proved reserves are identified within 12 months following the completion of exploratory drilling. The costs for the drilling of development wells are capitalized, whether or not successful.

PEMEX’s management makes periodic assessmentsconservation of the amounts included within fixedenvironment that are linked to revenue from current or future operations are accounted for as costs or assets, depending on the circumstances of each disbursement. Disbursements related to past operations, which no longer contribute to current or future revenues, are accounted for as current period costs.

The accrual of a liability for a future disbursement occurs when an obligation related to environmental remediation, for which PEMEX has the information necessary to determine whether capitalizationa reasonable estimated cost, is initially appropriate and can continue. Exploration wells capitalized beyond 12 months are subject to additional scrutinyidentified.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as to whether the facts and circumstances have changed and therefore whether the conditions described in the preceding paragraph no longer apply.noted)

 

(n)Retirement of assets

ObligationsRetirement of assets

The obligations associated with the future retirement of assets, including those related to the retirement of well, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment and their components, but excluding those related to the retirement of wells, are recognized at the date that the retirement obligation is incurred, based on the discounted cash flow method of accounting.method. The determination of the fair value is based on existing technology and regulations. If a reliable estimation of fair value cannot be made at the time the obligation is incurred, the accrual will be recognized when there is sufficient information to estimate the amount.fair value.

The costs and obligations related to the costs of future retirement of assets associated with the principal refining processes for gas and petrochemicals are not estimated.recognized. These assets are considered to have an indeterminateindefinite useful life as a result ofdue to the potential for maintenance and repairs, and, accordingly, PEMEX lacks sufficient information to reasonably determine the date on which they will be decommissioned (see Note 3(ab)).dismantled.

(o)Impairment of the value of long-lived assets

Long-lived assets are subject to an annual evaluation of impairment in accordance with Bulletin C-15, “Impairment of the Value of Long-Lived Assets and Their Disposal.” PEMEX measures the net carrying value of long-lived assets in order to determine whether the carrying value of the assets exceeds the recoverable amount, i.e., the future net revenues reasonably expected to be generated by the asset. If the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the recoverable amount, PEMEX recognizes an impairment charge in its statement of operations to recognize the asset at its recoverable amount (see Note 10).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(p)Reserve for abandonment cost of wells

The abandonment costs related to wells currently in production and wells temporarily closed are recorded in the statement of comprehensive income based on the units of production method. Total cost of abandonment and dismantlementplugging for non-producing wells is recognized in the statement of comprehensive income at the end of each period. All estimations are based on the useful lives of the wells, considering their discounted present value (discounted).value. Salvage values are not considered, as these values commonly have not traditionally existed. These costs are initially capitalized as part of the well’s value, and amortized according to its useful life (see Note 10(c)).

 

(q)(m)LeasesEmployee benefits

In accordancePEMEX operates a defined benefit pension plan under which it makes contributions to a fund that is administrated separately. PEMEX recognizes the cost for defined benefit plans based on independent actuarial computations applying the projected unit credit method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized within other comprehensive result for the period in which they occur.

The costs of prior services are recognized within profit or loss for the period in which they are incurred.

PEMEX’s net obligation with Bulletin D-5, “Leases,” as amended in 2011, PEMEX classifies as capital leases all those leases where PEMEX assumes substantially allrespect to the defined benefit plan equals the present value of the risksdefined benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets. The value of any asset is limited to the present value of available reimbursements and benefits ofreductions in future contributions to the leased property, whether or not there is a transfer of title. All other leases are considered to be operating leases.plan.

In addition, seniority premiums payable for disability are recognized within other long-term employee benefits.

Termination benefits are recognized in accordance with IFRIC 4, “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease,” issued byprofit or loss for the IFRS Interpretations Committee, PEMEX assesses at the execution date of any contract whether such contract relates to or contains a lease.period in which they are incurred.

 

(r)(n)Other assets

Other assets mainly include advance payments, long term receivables, intangible assets and other deferred assets, which are recorded at acquisition or carrying value. Amortization of intangible assets is calculated using the straight-line method.

(s)Accruals

PEMEX recognizes accruals where, as a result of a past event, PEMEX has incurred a legal or contractual obligation for which the transfer of assets is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. In certain cases, such amounts are recorded at their present value.

Environmental liabilities

In accordance with applicable legal requirements and accounting practices, a liability is recognized when the cost is probable and reasonably estimable. Disbursements related to the conservation of the environment that are linked to revenue from current or future operations are accounted for as costs or assets, depending on the particulars of each case. Disbursements related to past operations, which no longer contribute to current or future revenues, are accounted for as costs. The accrual of a liability for a future disbursement occurs when an obligation related to environmental remediation is identified for which PEMEX has the information necessary to determine a reasonable cost estimate (see Note 17(a)).

(t)Employee benefits

The accumulated benefits related to pensions, seniority premiums, other post-retirement benefits and employment termination for causes other than restructuring, to which all employees are entitled, are recorded in the statement of operations of each year, as part of the cost of sales and/or general expenses, as appropriate. The valuations of accumulated benefits are based on actuarial valuations performed by independent experts using the projected unit-credit method (see Note 13).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The amortization periods of the unamortized items are as follows:

Retirement benefits:

i.Initial transition liability and salary increases due to promotions, over a maximum of five years.

ii.Plan amendments and actuarial gains and losses for the period, over the employees’ average remaining years of employment.

Termination benefits:

i.Initial transition liability and plan amendments, over a maximum of five years.

ii.Salary increases due to promotions, over a maximum of one year.

iii.Actuarial gains and losses, immediate recognition.

As of December 31, 2011, the average remaining years of employment for those employees entitled to benefits in the plan was approximately 10 years.

The plan for other post-retirement benefits includes medical services for retired personnel and their dependents, as well as benefits in cash for gas, gasoline and basic necessities. PEMEX’s employee benefits obligations are included in these consolidated financial statements.

(u)Taxes and federal duties

Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities are primarily subject to the following special tax laws,laws:Derecho ordinario sobre hidrocarburos (Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty, or “DOSH”),Derecho sobre hidrocarburos para el fondo de estabilización (Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund) andImpuesto a los rendimientos petroleros (Hydrocarbon Income Tax, or “IRP”), all of which are based mainly on petroleum production and revenues from oil, gas and refined products. products taking into account certain tax deductions. These taxes and federal duties are recognized within profit or loss for the period in which they are incurred (see Note 17).

Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities areis not subject to theLey del Impuesto Sobre la Renta (Income Tax Law) orand theLey del Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única (Flat Rate Business Tax, or “IETU”) (see Note 19). The Subsidiary Entities are subject to these taxes.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Deferred taxes

Deferred taxes are recorded based on the assets and liabilities method, with a comprehensive approach, which consists of the recognition of deferred taxes by applying tax rates applicable to the Hydrocarbon Income TaxIRP and Tax on Incomeincome tax to the temporary differences between the bookcarrying value and tax values of assets and liabilities at the date of thethese consolidated financial statements (see Note 19(k) and (m)).statements. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that the tax benefits will be utilized.

 

(v)(o)SpecialImpuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicio (Special Tax on Production and Services (“IEPSor “IEPS Tax”)

The IEPS Tax charged to customers is a tax on domestic sales of gasoline and diesel. The applicable rates depend on, among other factors, the product, producer’s price, freight costs, commissions and the region in which the respective product is sold (see Note 19(j)).sold.

 

(w)(p)Comprehensive loss

Comprehensive loss represents the sum of the net (loss) gain for the period plus the currency translation effect, plus the effect of valuation of financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and of items required by specific accounting standards to be reflected in equity but which do not constitute equity contributions, reductions or distributions (see Note 14).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(x)Contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount thereof can be reasonably estimated. When a reasonable estimation cannot be made, qualitative disclosure is provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Contingent revenues, earnings or assets are not recognized until realization is assured (see Note 17).assured.

 

(y)(q)Revenue recognition

For all exportSales revenue is recognized the moment at which the risks and benefits of ownership of crude oil, refined products, risk of lossnatural gas, and ownership (title) isderivative and petrochemical products are transferred upon shipment. PEMEX therefore records sales revenue upon shipment to the customers abroad. In who acquire them, which occurs as follows:

in accordance with contractual terms;

the case of certain domestic sales inmoment at which the customer takespicks up product at PEMEX’s facilities; or

the moment at which PEMEX delivers the product to the delivery point.

PEMEX recognizes revenues for services at the time the collection right on such services arises.

(r)Presentation of consolidated statements of comprehensive income

The costs and expenses shown in PEMEX’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income are presented based on their function, which allows for a better understanding of the components of PEMEX’s operating income. This classification allows for a comparison to the industry to which PEMEX facility,belongs.

Cost of sales revenues are recorded

Cost of sales represents the cost of inventories at the time of delivery. For domesticsale. Cost of sales includes depreciation, amortization, salaries, wages and benefits, a portion of the cost of the reserve for employee benefits and operating expenses related to the production process.

Transportation, distribution and administrative expenses

Transportation, distribution and administrative expenses are costs in which PEMEX is responsible for productconnection to the storage and delivery risk of lossproducts, as well as costs related to PEMEX’s administrative personnel, such as depreciation, personnel-related expenses and ownership is transferred at the delivery point, and PEMEX records sales revenue upon delivery. Revenue for services rendered is recognized when PEMEX has a right to collect payment for such services.operating expenses associated with these activities.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(z)Comprehensive financing result (“CFR”)

CFR includesOther revenues and expenses, net

Other revenues consists primarily of income received due to the “negative” IEPS Tax rate (see Notes 17(j) and 19).

Financing income and cost

Financing income and cost are comprised of interest income and expense, foreign exchange gains and lossesexpenses and the valuation effects of financial instruments, minus any portion of the comprehensive financing resultcost that is capitalized (see Note 12).capitalized.

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the exchangeExchange rate in effect on the date of executionvariations

Exchange rate variations relating to assets or settlement. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of the consolidated statement of financial position. Foreign exchange differences arising from assets and liabilitiesgoverned by contracts denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in income forof the year.period.

(aa) Operating segments

(s)Operating segments

Operating segments are identifiable components of PEMEX that pursue business activities from which PEMEX earns revenues and incurs expenses, including those revenues and expenses from transactions with other segments of PEMEX, and for which information is available to management on a segmented basis and is assessed by PEMEX’sthe Board management in order to allocate resources and assess the profitability of the segments.

(ab) Accounting changes

(t)Accounting policy changes

The IASB issued the following new FRS and the interpretations and revisions mentioned below, issued by theConsejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera(the Mexican Board of Financial Reporting Standards, or the CINIF), became effective for fiscal yearsIFRS, which apply to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011, with2013:

IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”)

IFRS 10 defines the respective prospective or retrospective application noted in each case.

(i)2011 Accounting ChangesIn December 2010, the CINIF issued the following revisions to FRS, which supersede the previous rules in each case:

FRS B-5, “Segmentprinciple of control, establishes control as the basis for consolidation and sets outs the accounting requirements for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. IFRS 10 supersedes both IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Information”—FRS B-5 took effect as of January 1, 2011, with retrospective application. The principal changes as compared to Bulletin B-5, “Segment financial information,” which it supersedes, include the following:Statements” (“IAS 27”), and SIC-12, “Consolidation—Special Purpose Entities”.

The informationadoption of IFRS 10 did not have any accounting impact on PEMEX’s financial statements.

IAS 27 (Revised), Separate Financial Statements (“IAS 27 Revised”)

IAS 27 Revised supersedes IAS 27, and is now limited to only setting the standards to be disclosed by operating segment isapplied in accounting for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and structured entities within separate (non-consolidated) financial statements. The general requirements for the information regularly used by top managementaforementioned entities remain substantially unchanged under IAS 27 Revised.

The adoption of IAS 27 did not have any accounting impact on PEMEX’s financial statements.

IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements (“IFRS 11”)

IFRS 11, which supersedes IAS 31, “Joint Ventures”, outlines the accounting practices for entities that agree to jointly control an arrangement. Arrangements subject to joint control are classified as either a joint operation or a joint venture. IFRS 11 sets forth that investments in joint ventures should be recognized using the equity method and does not require segmentation into primary and secondary information or into segments identified based on products or services (economic segments), geographicalno longer allows for the application of the proportionate consolidation method.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

areas or homogeneous customer groups. Additionally, disclosure by the entity as a whole of information on its products or services, geographical areas and principal customers and suppliers is required.

FRS B-5 does not requireA joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the entity’s business areas be subjectarrangement have rights to different risksthe net assets of the arrangement and a joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to qualify as operating segments.

Business areasthe assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement. A joint venture is recognized through the equity method and a joint operation’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses related to its involvement in the pre-operating stage may be classified as operating segments.

FRS B-5 requires disclosing separately by segment, interest revenue and expense, as well as all other components of CFR. In specific cases, disclosure of net interest income is permissible.

Disclosure of the liability amounts includedarrangement are accounted for in the usual operating segment information normally used by top management is required.accordance with relevant IFRS standards.

The adoption of this new FRS affected the presentation of PEMEX’s segment information, butIFRS 11 did not have any material effects for accounting purposes (see Note 18).impact on PEMEX’s financial statements.

FRS B-9,Interim Financial Reporting”—FRS B-9 took effect asIFRS 12, Disclosure of January 1, 2011, with retrospective application.The principal changes as comparedInterests in Other Entities (“IFRS 12”)

IFRS 12 establishes the disclosure requirements relating to Bulletin B-9—“Interim financial reporting,” which it supersedes, include the following:

FRS B-9 requires that the interim financial information,investments in addition to the statement of financial position and statement of operations, include a comparative and condensed statement of stockholders’ equity and statement of cash flows, and, for not-for-profit entities, the presentation of the statement of activities is expressly required.

FRS B-9 establishes that the financial information reported at the end of an interim period should be presented comparatively with the equivalent interim period of the immediately preceding year and, in the case of the statement of financial position, compared also to such financial statement at the immediately preceding year-end date.

FRS B-9 requires that the financial information reported at the end of an interim period include statements of operations for the most recent fiscal quarter, for the period between the end of the preceding fiscal year and the end of the most recent fiscal quarter and for the corresponding periods of the preceding fiscal year.

New terminologysubsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and/or unconsolidated structured entities. The additional required disclosure is included and defined.in Note 9.

The adoption of this new FRSIFRS 12 did not have any material effectsaccounting impact on PEMEX’s financial statements.

IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement (“IFRS 13”)

IFRS 13 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement and requires disclosure about fair value measurements. However, it does not set forth additional requirements or prohibitions on the presentationuse of fair value.

The adoption of IFRS 13 did not have any accounting impact on PEMEX’s audited year-end financial statements.

FRS C-4, “Inventories”FRS C-4 took effect asIAS 19 (Revised), Employee Benefits (“IAS 19 Revised”)

IAS 19 Revised eliminates the “corridor” approach previously used to recognize actuarial gains and losses related to employee benefits. Under IAS 19 Revised, actuarial gains and losses related to employee benefits are recognized in other comprehensive results upon their determination. Any such gains and losses that are recognized in the consolidated statements of January 1, 2011, with retrospective application, supersedes Bulletin C-4, “Inventories,”comprehensive income are limited to past and establishes new valuation, presentationcurrent service costs, termination gains and disclosure rules for initiallosses and subsequent recognition of inventoriesinterest income or expense. All other changes to the liabilities and assets related to retirement and post-employment benefits are recognized in other comprehensive results and have no further impact on the statementconsolidated statements of comprehensive income. PEMEX chose the early adoption of IAS 19 Revised in 2012.

(u)New accounting policies not yet adopted

The IASB issued the new IFRS mentioned below, which are effective for annual periods described therein. PEMEX is in the process of evaluating the impact that these standards will have on its financial statements.

IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (2010) (“IFRS 9 (2010)”) and IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (2009) (“IFRS 9 (2009)”)

IFRS 9 (2009) introduces new requirements for classifying and measuring financial assets. Under IFRS 9 (2009), financial assets are classified and measured based on the entity’s business model for the financial asset and the characteristics of the contractual cash flows associated with the financial asset. IFRS 9 (2010) introduces additional changes relating to financial liabilities. Currently, the IASB intends to make limited modifications to the classification and measurement requirements of IFRS 9 (2009) and IFRS 9 (2010) and to add new requirements to address the impairment of financial position, as well as rules for the valuation of the inventories of service providers. The principalassets and changes are as follows:to hedge accounting.

Direct costing may not be used to value inventory; absorption costing must be used instead.

If inventory cost is higher than net realizable value, cost must be adjusted to equal net realizable value.

For inventories acquired on an installment payment basis, the difference between the purchase price under normal credit terms and the amount paid must be recognized as financial cost during the financing period and is not considered as part of inventory cost.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

IFRS 9 (2010) and IFRS 9 (2009) are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. It is anticipated that the adoption of these standards will have an impact on PEMEX’s financial assets but not its financial liabilities.

In November 2013, the IASB announced the completion of a package of amendments to the accounting requirements for financial instruments. The amendments:

i.bring into effect a substantial overhaul of hedge accounting that will allow entities to better reflect their risk management activities in the financial statements;

ii.allow the changes that address the so-called “own credit” issue that were already included in IFRS 9 to be applied in isolation without the need to change any other accounting for financial instruments; and

iii.remove the January 1, 2015 mandatory effective date of IFRS 9, to provide sufficient time for preparers of financial statements to make the transition to the new requirements.

IFRS 14, Regulatory Deferral Accounts (“IFRS 14”)

The objective of this standard is to specify the reporting requirements for rate-regulated activities that arise when an entity is subject to rate regulation. In many countries, industry sectors are subject to rate regulation, whereby governments regulate the supply and prices of certain types of activities undertaken by private entities.

IFRS 14 allows first-time adopters of IFRS to continue recognizing amounts related to rate regulation, in accordance with their respective previous local generally accepted accounting principles requirements. However, to facilitate comparison of financial statements among entities that have already adopted IFRS, the standard requires separate presentation of regulatory rate effects.

Entities that already present financial statements in accordance with IFRS, such as PEMEX, are not eligible to apply IFRS 14.

IFRS 14 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016; however, early adoption is permitted. As stated above, this standard will not have an impact on PEMEX’s financial statements because entities that have already adopted IFRS are not eligible to apply IFRS 14.

NOTE 4—SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

PEMEX’s primary business is the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas and the refining and marketing of petroleum products, conducted through six business segments: Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, Pemex-Petrochemicals, the Trading Companies (as defined below) and Corporate and Other Subsidiary Companies. Management makes decisions related to the operations of the consolidated business along these six strategic lines. Due to PEMEX’s structure, there are significant quantities of inter-segment sales among the reporting segments, which are made at internal transfer prices established by PEMEX reflecting international market prices.

The primary sources of revenue for the segments are as described below:

 

Under certain circumstances, estimatesPemex-Exploration and Production earns revenues from domestic crude oil sales, as well as from the export of impairment losses on inventories recognizedcrude oil through the Trading Companies (as defined below). Export sales are made through PMI CIM to approximately 26 major customers in a prior period may be deducted or charged off against the resultsvarious foreign markets. Approximately half of operations for the period in which such modifications occur.

Only items whose benefits and risks have already been transferredPEMEX’s crude oil is sold to the entity may be recognized as inventories; therefore, prepayments are not part of inventory.

Pemex-Refining.

The consolidated financial statements of 2010 and 2009 were retrospectively adjusted to recognize the effect of the change in the method of inventory valuation from direct costing to absorption costing, as follows:

   As of December 31, 2010 
   Previously reported
amounts
  Accounting
changes
  Adjusted amounts 

Statement of Financial Position

    

Inventories (Note 7)

  Ps.38,037,560   Ps.  2,481,306   Ps.40,518,866  

Accumulated losses from prior years

   (352,491,797  1,545,935    (350,945,862

Net (loss) for the year

   (47,462,608  935,371    (46,527,237
   For the year ended December 31, 2010 

Statement of Operations

    

Cost of sales

  Ps.632,290,416   Ps.(935,371 Ps.631,355,045  

   As of January 1, 2010 
   Previously reported
amounts
  Accounting
changes
  Adjusted amounts 

Statement of Financial Position

    

Inventories

  Ps.36,903,080   Ps.  1,545,935   Ps.38,449,015  

Accumulated losses from prior years

   (257,829,779  1,253,763    (256,576,016

Net (loss) for the year

   (94,662,018  292,172    (94,369,846
   For the year ended December 31, 2009 

Statement of Operations

    

Cost of sales

  Ps.561,134,955   Ps.(292,172 Ps.560,842,783  

FRS C-5, “Prepayments and other assets”FRS C-5 took effect as of January 1, 2011, with retrospective application, supersedes Bulletin C-5, “Prepayments,” and includes primarily the following changes:

Advances for the purchase of inventories (current assets) or property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (non-current assets), among others, must be reported under prepayments if the benefits and risks inherent in the assets to be acquired or the services to be received have not yet been transferred to the entity. Furthermore, prepaid expenses must be reported based on the nature of the item to be acquired, either under current assets or non-current assets.

When an impairment loss on the value of prepayments occurs, the unrecoverable amount must be reported in the statement of operations. Additionally, if the necessary conditions exist, the impairment effect may be reversed and recorded in the statement of operations for the related future period.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

Pemex-Refining earns revenues from sales of refined petroleum products and derivatives. Most of Pemex-Refining’s sales are to third parties and occur within the domestic market. The entity sells a significant portion of its fuel oil production to theComisión Federal de Electricidad (Federal Electricity Commission, or “CFE”) and jet fuel toAeropuertos y Servicios Auxiliares (the Airports and Auxiliary Services Agency). Pemex-Refining’s most important products are different types of gasoline.

Among other things, the following must be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements: breakdownPemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals earns revenues primarily from domestic sources. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals also consumes high levels of prepayments, accounting policies for recognition and impairment losses, and any relevant reversal of impairments.

The adoptionits own natural gas production. Most revenues of this new FRS did not have any material effects on the presentation of PEMEX’s financial statements.

FRS C-6, “Property, Plant and Equipment”FRS C-6 took effect as of January 1, 2011, except for changes arising from segregation into the components of property, plant and equipment items having a clearly different useful life, which is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2012. The accounting changes resultingentity are obtained from the initial applicationsale of this FRS must be prospectively recognized. The principal changes as compared to Bulletin C-6, “Property, Plantethane and Equipment,” which it supersedes, include the following:

Property, plant and equipment to develop or maintain biological and extraction industry assets are within the scope of this FRS.

butane gas.

 

Pemex-Petrochemicals is engaged in the sale of petrochemical products to the domestic market. Pemex-Petrochemicals offers a wide range of products. The treatmentmajority of asset exchanges based on the economic substance is included.

Pemex-Petrochemicals’ revenues comes from methane derivatives, ethane derivatives and aromatics and derivatives.

 

The bases for determinationtrading companies, which consist of the residual value of a component are added.

PMI NASA, PMI CIM, MGAS and PMI Trading (the “Trading Companies”), earn revenues from trading crude oil, natural gas and petroleum and petrochemical products within international markets.

 

The requirementCorporate and Other Subsidiary Companies provide administrative, financing, consulting and logistical services, as well as economic, tax and legal advice to assign an appraised value to property, plantPEMEX’s entities and equipment acquired at no cost or at less than fair value, and to assign a donation surplus, is eliminated.

companies.

Depreciation of components of a property, plant and equipment item is mandatory, independently of the depreciation of the rest of the item as if it were a single component.

Depreciation of idle components must continue, unless depreciation is determined based on the activity.

The adoption of this new FRS affected the presentation of PEMEX’s information relating to wells, pipelines, property, plant and equipment, but did not have any material effects for accounting purposes (see Note 10).

FRS C-18, “Property, Plant and Equipment Retirement Obligations”—FRS C-18 took effect as of January 1, 2011, and primarily provides the following requirements for valuation of fixed asset component retirement obligations:

Retirement obligations must be recognized as an accrual that increases the acquisition cost of a component.

Future retirement obligations are estimated using the discounted present value of the estimated future cash flows needed to retire the asset or component.

A suitable discount rate must be used to determine estimated future cash flows, incorporating the cost of money and the entity’s credit risk.

Changes in the valuation of retirement obligations (accruals) resulting from revisions to the estimated future cash flows, the periodicity for settlement and the suitable discount rate to be used must be recognized for accounting purposes.

Disclosures must be made if an entity has a component retirement obligation.

The adoption of this new FRS did not have any effect on the presentation of PEMEX’s financial statements.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(ii)2011 FRS Amendments—

In December 2010, the CINIF announced theThe following amendments to certain existing FRS that took effect for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011:

FRS B-1 “Accounting changes and error corrections”—Requires the presentation of the initial statement of financial position and the initial statement of changes in equity when retrospective adjustments are made, as well as the retrospective effects of application and the restated balances. These changes are in effect for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2011, with retrospective application.

FRS B-2 “Statement of Cash Flows”—Eliminates the requirement totables present the line item “Cash surplus to be appliedcondensed financial information of these segments, after elimination of unrealized intersegment gain (loss). These reporting segments are those which PEMEX’s management evaluates in financing activities or cash to be obtained from financing activities”, and makes the presentationits analysis of such line item optional but recommended. This amendment is in effect for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2011, with retrospective application.

Bulletin C-3, “Accounts Receivable”—Establishes that interest income on accounts receivable should be recognized when accrued, provided that the relevant amount is reliably valued and likely to be recovered. Interest income on accounts receivable unlikely to be recovered is not recognized. This amendment is in effect for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2011, with prospective application.

Bulletin C-10, “Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities”The amendments to Bulletin C-10 took effect as of January 1, 2011. The principal amendments include the following:PEMEX.

 

An intra-group transaction may be recognized as a hedging activity only when the functional currencies of the related parties involved in such transaction are different from each other.

Reporting of the effect of a hedged interest rate risk is required when a portfolio portion is the hedged position.

Account margins must be reported separately.

In a hedge relationship, a portion of the total amount of the DFI may be designated as the hedging instrument. However, it is not possible to designate only a portion of the term of the hedging instrument as a hedge relationship.

The adoption of these 2011 FRS amendments did not have any material effects on the presentation of PEMEX’s audited year-end financial statements.

Year ended December 31, 2013:

 Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Trading
Companies
  Corporate
and Other
Subsidiary
Companies
  Intersegment
Eliminations
  Total 

Sales:

        

Trade

 Ps.—     Ps.740,371,929   Ps.143,290,615   Ps.26,525,091   Ps.687,677,633   Ps.—     Ps.—     Ps.1,597,865,268  

Intersegment

  1,250,771,663    74,893,930    73,998,380    13,840,212    407,663,967    56,136,413    (1,877,304,565  —    

Services income

  —      4,125,144    2,180,256    —      786,596    4,432,211    (1,184,850  10,339,357  

Cost of sales

  (338,550,003  (963,816,046  (205,190,171  (43,128,475  (1,079,513,935  (5,288,105  1,821,480,397    (814,006,338
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income (loss)

  912,221,660    (144,425,043  14,279,080    (2,763,172  16,614,261    55,280,519    (57,009,018  794,198,287  

Other revenues and expenses—net

  (27,207,006  97,387,329    1,142,830    1,102,963    (6,525,139  (1,082,910  (291,217  64,526,850  

Transportation and distribution expenses

  —      (28,989,721  (2,623,144  (880,839  (395,725  35    440,958    (32,448,436

Administrative expenses

  (42,809,551  (32,927,261  (11,352,890  (12,706,033  (1,789,969  (54,012,586  56,943,818    (98,654,472
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  842,205,103    (108,954,696  1,445,876    (15,247,081  7,903,428    185,058    84,541    727,622,229  

Financing cost

  (48,381,896  (15,049,203  (595,846  (67,170  (3,451,846  (76,659,137  90,138,077    (54,067,021

Financing income

  24,936,100    289,978    3,720,376    382,930    3,074,167    82,386,675    (90,263,017  24,527,209  

Exchange gain (loss)

  (4,071,119  699,215    (69,484  17,082    (44,828  (482,358  —      (3,951,492

Profit (loss) sharing in associates

  207,132    —      933,927    —      (577,434  (173,785,799  173,928,884    706,710  

Total taxes, duties and other

  (856,978,971  —      (1,525,410  (21,349  (3,930,748  (2,439,584  —      (864,896,062
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

  (42,083,651  (123,014,706  3,909,439    (14,935,588  2,972,739    (170,795,145  173,888,485    (170,058,427

Total current assets

  502,902,664    274,764,785    115,251,777    72,066,407    106,410,426    497,731,670    (1,302,213,859  266,913,870  

Permanent investments in associates

  1,189,451    488,319    4,294,023    —      7,018,985    419,817,118    (416,028,395  16,779,501  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment—net

  1,315,399,260    253,117,660    101,513,879    39,008,884    1,982,647    10,556,411    —      1,721,578,741  

Total assets

  1,837,046,755    529,767,519    221,866,273    111,818,055    122,116,141    1,688,293,303    (2,463,517,693  2,047,390,353  

Total current liabilities

  213,952,321    352,932,603    35,977,158    6,145,414    81,810,182    863,145,326    (1,294,772,172  259,190,832  

Long-term debt

  719,013,631    23,360,262    1,094,807    171,745    3,617,414    737,651,756    (734,346,144  750,563,471  

Employee benefits

  342,612,970    354,166,740    83,372,338    107,202,896    1,222,116    230,630,810    —      1,119,207,870  

Total liabilities

  1,342,978,777    740,780,574    144,252,327    113,696,802    90,354,847    1,847,935,634    (2,047,361,968  2,232,636,993  

Equity (Deficit)

  494,067,978    (211,013,055  77,613,946    (1,878,747  31,761,294    (159,642,331  (416,155,725  (185,246,640

Depreciation and amortization

  127,029,321    10,780,711    7,060,955    2,563,482    9,321    1,050,068    (2,154  148,491,704  

Net periodic cost of employee benefits

  36,532,518    37,401,828    8,837,963    11,112,176    204,268    21,250,936    —      115,339,689  

Acquisition of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  205,579,644    31,587,666    5,170,234    5,237,725    1,907,105    2,162,441    —      251,644,815  

(iii)Reclassifications—PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 have been reclassified in certain accounts, with the purpose of making them comparable with the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011. The main reclassifications were under other revenues—net, and under (loss) profit sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

NOTE 4—FOREIGN CURRENCY EXPOSURE:

Year ended December 31, 2012:

 Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Trading
Companies
  Corporate
and Other
Subsidiary

Companies
  Intersegment
Eliminations
  Total 

Sales:

        

Trade

 Ps.—     Ps.720,874,065   Ps.118,402,283   Ps.27,760,353   Ps.772,699,053   Ps.—     Ps.—     Ps. 1,639,735,754  

Intersegment

  1,333,286,214    61,480,371    66,226,902    7,650,488    448,731,943    55,352,873    (1,972,728,791  —    

Services income

  —      4,361,364    1,088,258    —      727,371    2,191,282    (1,191,989  7,176,286  

Cost of sales

  (302,840,887  (1,025,958,672  (175,765,662  (31,826,657  (1,211,608,953  (2,900,312  1,918,410,569    (832,490,574
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income (loss)

  1,030,445,327    (239,242,872  9,951,781    3,584,184    10,549,414    54,643,843    (55,510,211  814,421,466  

Other revenues and expenses—net

  448,248    211,227,180    (1,008,016  (814,161  (138,712  (326,438  (369,138  209,018,963  

Transportation and distribution expenses

  —      (25,162,163  (2,461,140  (809,784  (325,402  (54,760  324,966    (28,488,283

Administrative expenses

  (40,979,675  (32,751,142  (10,678,233  (12,414,605  (1,330,361  (47,321,046  55,862,213    (89,612,849
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  989,913,900    (85,928,997  (4,195,608  (10,454,366  8,754,939    6,941,599    307,830    905,339,297  

Financing cost

  (50,578,659  (20,179,519  (1,432,540  (816,496  (10,151,108  (78,064,892  88,271,976    (72,951,238

Financing income

  17,336,197    589,603    4,511,208    16,447    8,915,706    80,420,511    (88,574,834  23,214,838  

Exchange gain (loss)

  35,186,096    3,421,271    368,507    840    16,773    5,852,174    —      44,845,661  

Profit (loss) sharing in associates

  189,227    —      2,140,344    —      1,389,441    (7,118,378  8,196,973    4,797,607  

Total taxes, duties and other

  (898,064,551  —      221,123    (16,774  (1,817,453  (2,968,032  —      (902,645,687
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  93,982,210    (102,097,642  1,613,034    (11,270,349  7,108,298    5,062,982    8,201,945    2,600,478  

Total current assets

  558,119,361    284,541,363    98,911,204    78,807,571    113,000,751    486,513,401    (1,301,751,526  318,142,125  

Permanent investments in associates

  982,320    409,266    3,751,219    —      7,527,734    380,364,510    (378,388,786  14,646,263  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment—net

  1,268,551,020    234,415,129    104,165,805    40,945,932    225,166    10,431,033    —      1,658,734,085  

Total assets

  1,836,007,172    520,567,164    207,224,542    120,216,927    127,859,808    1,549,109,628    (2,336,802,345  2,024,182,896  

Total current liabilities

  167,466,913    330,225,909    23,617,986    6,478,390    87,534,727    913,204,611    (1,292,724,887  235,803,649  

Long—term debt

  633,350,725    24,050,812    1,119,845    185,303    2,351,037    661,796,313    (650,236,440  672,617,595  

Employee benefits

  412,306,417    429,583,865    96,139,228    127,012,099    1,347,909    222,151,241    —      1,288,540,759  

Total liabilities

  1,276,781,279    794,166,012    145,426,752    133,924,623    94,597,039    1,808,776,162    (1,958,423,121  2,295,248,746  

Equity (Deficit)

  559,225,893    (273,598,848  61,797,790    (13,707,696  33,262,769    (259,666,534  (378,379,224  (271,065,850

Depreciation and amortization

  118,246,402    11,071,793    7,769,141    2,725,017    7,983    717,384    —      140,537,720  

Net periodic cost of employee benefits

  31,045,021    31,221,665    7,331,348    9,121,565    101,143    17,781,595    —      96,602,337  

Acquisition of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  168,534,984    26,605,301    2,831,398    8,794,184    —      812,399    —      207,578,266  

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the consolidated financial statements of PEMEX included the following assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies:

   Amounts in foreign currency        
   Assets   Liabilities  Net liability
position
  Year-end
exchange rate
   Amounts in pesos 

2011:(1)

        

U.S. dollars

   14,797,438     (46,704,226  (31,906,788  13.9904     Ps. (446,388,727

Japanese yen

        (160,477,558  (160,477,558  0.18130     (29,094,581

Pounds sterling

   247     (772,060  (771,813  21.7425     (16,781,144

Euros

   224,258     (4,746,768  (4,522,510  18.1595     (82,126,520

Swiss francs

   504,529     (1,008,541  (504,012  14.9199     (7,519,809

Canadian dollars

   79     (106  (27  13.7228     (371
        

 

 

 

Total liability position, before foreign currency hedging

         Ps. (581,911,152
        

 

 

 

   Amounts in foreign currency        
   Assets   Liabilities  Net liability
position
  Year-end
exchange rate
   Amounts in pesos 

2010:(1)

        

U.S. dollars

   14,175,680     (39,156,937  (24,981,257  12.3571     Ps. (308,695,891

Japanese yen

        (190,574,762  (190,574,762  0.1526     (29,081,709

Pounds sterling

   3,380     (769,079  (765,699  19.3463     (14,813,443

Euros

   38,819     (3,721,879  (3,683,060  16.5733     (61,040,458

Swiss francs

   506,316     (1,008,516  (502,200  13.2757     (6,667,057

Canadian dollars

   79     (5,597  (5,518  12.4354     (68,619
        

 

 

 

Total liability position, before foreign currency hedging

         Ps. (420,367,177
        

 

 

 

(1)As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, PEMEX had foreign exchange derivative financial instruments, which are discussed in Note 12.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Year ended December 31, 2011:

 Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Trading
Companies
  Corporate
and Other
Subsidiary
Companies
  Intersegment
Eliminations
  Total 

Sales:

        

Trade

 Ps.—     Ps.621,678,105   Ps.128,665,354   Ps.28,854,514   Ps.772,965,363   Ps.—     Ps.—     Ps. 1,552,163,336  

Intersegment

  1,270,839,927    75,154,806    77,479,563    14,583,501    424,018,097    45,389,776    (1,907,465,670  —    

Services income

  —      3,619,441    1,107,783    —      942,302    2,054,886    (1,433,631  6,290,781  

Cost of sales

  (275,325,700  (931,101,803  (202,116,728  (43,882,724  (1,187,096,578  (2,668,178  1,863,415,340    (778,776,371
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income (loss)

  995,514,227    (230,649,451  5,135,972    (444,709  10,829,184    44,776,484    (45,483,961  779,677,746  

Other revenues and expenses—net

  11,274,243    173,375,469    214,394    6,592,870    462,158    (2,277,129  (522,144  189,119,861  

Transportation and distribution expenses

  —      (23,730,912  (2,360,876  (690,816  (368,659  (26,721  468,307    (26,709,677

Administrative expenses

  (34,327,210  (28,019,853  (9,917,263  (10,946,514  (1,082,261  (42,172,197  45,688,479    (80,776,819
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  972,461,260    (109,024,747  (6,927,773  (5,489,169  9,840,422    300,437    150,681    861,311,111  

Financing cost

  (42,188,969  (16,635,802  (5,374,311  (756,538  (8,187,285  (78,108,831  88,015,529    (63,236,207

Financing income

  18,121,683    395,051    8,700,706    16,533    5,738,536    85,769,298    (88,157,573  30,584,234  

Exchange gain (loss)

  (48,149,666  (6,607,465  (261,715  (15,805  (27,522  (5,081,079  —      (60,143,252

Profit (loss) sharing in associates

  39,873    —      (341,562  —      (84,873  (110,195,198  109,771,007    (810,753

Total taxes, duties and other

  (871,471,372  —      857,340    (10,532  (3,458,054  (564,772  —      (874,647,390
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  28,812,809    (131,872,963  (3,347,315  (6,255,511  3,821,224    (107,880,145  109,779,644    (106,942,257

Net periodic cost of employee benefits

  27,078,766    27,262,316    6,559,388    7,931,521    113,570    15,149,591    —      84,095,152  

Depreciation and amortization

  108,404,968    9,015,060    7,307,057    2,026,575    6,334    620,415    —      127,380,409  

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

PEMEX’s management measures the performance of the entities based on operating income and net segment income before elimination of unrealized intersegment gain (loss), as well as by analyzing the impact of the results of each segment in the consolidated financial statements. For certain of the items in these consolidated financial statements to agree with the individual financial statements of the operating segments, they must be reconciled. The tables below present the financial information of PEMEX’s operating segments, before intersegment eliminations:

   Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Trading Companies  Corporate and Other
Subsidiary Companies
 

Year ended December 31, 2013:

       

Sales:

       

By segment

  Ps. 1,250,785,620   Ps.820,912,682   Ps.219,332,517   Ps.40,360,373   Ps. 1,096,302,859   Ps.60,568,624  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (13,957  (1,521,679  136,734    4,930    (174,663  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated sales

  Ps. 1,250,771,663   Ps.819,391,003   Ps.219,469,251   Ps.40,365,303   Ps. 1,096,128,196   Ps.60,568,624  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

       

By segment

   850,636,276    (119,734,273  873,221    (15,418,058  2,568,759    185,058  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (12,826  (1,521,678  136,735    4,929    (174,663  —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   17,747    12,301,255    435,920    166,048    5,509,332    —    

Less capitalized refined products

   (8,555,076  —      —      —      —      —    

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,982    —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

  Ps.842,205,103   Ps. (108,954,696 Ps.1,445,876   Ps. (15,247,081 Ps.7,903,428   Ps.185,058  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss):

       

By segment

   (33,648,136  (133,794,283  3,336,785    (15,034,571  (2,361,930  (173,636,180

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (12,826  (1,521,678  136,734    4,930    (174,663  —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   17,747    12,301,255    435,920    166,048    5,509,332    —    

Less capitalized refined products

   (8,555,076  —      —      —      —      —    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   (4,342  —      —      (71,995  —      2,841,035  

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,982    —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

  Ps.(42,083,651 Ps. (123,014,706 Ps.3,909,439   Ps. (14,935,588 Ps.2,972,739   Ps.(170,795,145
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Assets:

       

By segment

   1,856,325,965    575,246,559    224,241,728    114,087,313    119,933,908    1,685,452,269  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (9,479  3,753,919    140,189    7,310    3,232,537    —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   (11,777  (49,232,959  (2,515,644  (2,204,574  (1,050,304  —    

Less capitalized refined products

   (16,755,002  —      —      —      —      —    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   (4,344  —      —      (71,994  —      2,841,034  

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   (2,498,608  —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated assets

  Ps. 1,837,046,755   Ps.529,767,519   Ps. 221,866,273   Ps. 111,818,055   Ps.122,116,141   Ps. 1,688,293,303  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Trading Companies  Corporate and Other
Subsidiary Companies
 

Liabilities:

       

By segment

   1,342,978,777    740,780,574    144,252,327    113,696,802    87,307,528    1,847,935,634  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   —      —      —      —      3,047,319    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated liabilities

  Ps. 1,342,978,777   Ps.740,780,574   Ps.144,252,327   Ps. 113,696,802   Ps.90,354,847   Ps. 1,847,935,634  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012:

       

Sales:

       

By segment

  Ps. 1,333,276,930   Ps.784,417,918   Ps.184,985,084   Ps.35,418,252   Ps.1,221,655,507   Ps.57,544,155  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   9,284    2,297,882    732,359    (7,411  502,860    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated sales

  Ps. 1,333,286,214   Ps.786,715,800   Ps.185,717,443   Ps.35,410,841   Ps.1,222,158,367   Ps.57,544,155  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

       

By segment

   993,473,459    (95,467,749  (4,379,626  (10,250,176  8,801,985    6,941,599  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   9,284    2,297,882    732,359    (7,411  502,860    —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   (8,394  7,240,870    (548,341  (196,779  (549,906  —    

Less capitalized refined products

   (3,679,430  —      —      —      —      —    

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981    —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

  Ps.989,913,900   Ps.(85,928,997 Ps.(4,195,608 Ps.(10,454,366 Ps.8,754,939   Ps.6,941,599  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss):

       

By segment

   97,536,450    (111,636,394  1,429,016    (11,066,159  7,155,344    (854,312

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   9,284    2,297,882    732,359    (7,411  502,860    —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   (8,394  7,240,870    (548,341  (196,779  (549,906  —    

Less capitalized refined products

   (3,679,430  —      —      —      —      —    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   5,319    —      —      —      —      5,917,294  

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981    —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

  Ps.93,982,210   Ps. (102,097,642 Ps.1,613,034   Ps.(11,270,349 Ps.7,108,298   Ps.5,062,982  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Assets:

       

By segment

   1,846,831,001    583,489,721    210,263,190    122,663,976    130,797,642    1,543,192,334  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   —      (4,419,930  (958,022  (7,654  (2,102,134  —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   (11,633  (58,502,627  (2,080,626  (2,439,395  (835,700  —    

Less capitalized refined products

   (8,199,925  —      —      —      —      —    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   5,319    —      —      —      —      5,917,294  

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   (2,617,590  —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated assets

  Ps. 1,836,007,172   Ps.520,567,164   Ps.207,224,542   Ps.120,216,927   Ps.127,859,808   Ps.1,549,109,628  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Trading Companies  Corporate and Other
Subsidiary Companies
 

Liabilities:

       

By segment

   1,276,781,279    794,166,012    145,426,752    133,924,623    96,699,173    1,808,776,162  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   —      —      —      —      (2,102,134  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated liabilities

  Ps. 1,276,781,279   Ps.794,166,012   Ps.145,426,752   Ps. 133,924,623   Ps.94,597,039   Ps. 1,808,776,162  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2011:

       

Sales:

       

By segment

  Ps. 1,270,854,327   Ps.703,698,643   Ps.208,136,502   Ps.43,445,669   Ps. 1,198,617,934   Ps.47,444,662  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (14,400  (3,246,291  (883,802  (7,654  (692,172  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated sales

  Ps. 1,270,839,927   Ps.700,452,352   Ps.207,252,700   Ps.43,438,015   Ps. 1,197,925,762   Ps.47,444,662  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

       

By segment

   976,875,297    (76,575,103  (4,833,882  (4,740,125  10,370,875    623,875  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (14,400  (3,246,291  (883,802  (7,654  (692,172  —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   1,877    (29,203,353  (1,210,089  (741,390  161,719    (323,438

Less capitalized refined products

   (4,520,495  —      —      —      —      —    

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981    —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

  Ps.972,461,260   Ps. (109,024,747 Ps.(6,927,773 Ps.(5,489,169 Ps.9,840,422   Ps.300,437  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss):

       

By segment

   33,234,258    (99,423,319  (1,253,424  (5,506,467  4,351,677    (67,519,241

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (14,400  (3,246,291  (883,802  (7,654  (692,172  —    

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   1,877    (29,203,353  (1,210,089  (741,390  161,719    (323,438

Less capitalized refined products

   (4,520,495  —      —      —      —      —    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   (7,412  —      —      —      —      (40,037,466

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981    —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated net income (loss)

  Ps.28,812,809   Ps. (131,872,963 Ps.(3,347,315 Ps.(6,255,511 Ps.3,821,224   Ps.(107,880,145
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Supplemental geographic information:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013   2012   2011 

Domestic sales

  Ps.910,187,634    Ps.867,036,701    Ps.779,197,974  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Export sales:

      

United States

   493,148,967     573,515,085     613,805,564  

Canada; Central and South America

   21,004,723     39,806,335     34,921,636  

Europe

   86,872,410     98,987,049     70,567,172  

Other

   86,651,534     60,390,584     53,670,990  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total export sales

  Ps.687,677,634    Ps.772,699,053    Ps.772,965,362  

Services income

   10,339,357     7,176,286     6,290,781  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total sales

  Ps. 1,608,204,625    Ps. 1,646,912,040    Ps. 1,558,454,117  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

PEMEX does not have significant long-lived assets outside of Mexico.

The following table shows income by product:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013   2012   2011 

Domestic Sales

      

Refined petroleum products and derivatives (primarily gasolines)

  Ps. 805,460,402    Ps. 779,572,582    Ps. 676,407,259  

Gas

   70,781,410     51,249,544     65,847,550  

Petrochemical products

   33,945,822     36,214,575     36,943,165  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic sales

  Ps. 910,187,634    Ps. 867,036,701    Ps. 779,197,974  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Export Sales

      

Crude oil

  Ps.548,411,085    Ps. 618,104,685    Ps. 614,161,757  

Refined petroleum products and derivatives (primarily gasolines)

   137,048,991     150,850,052     155,553,997  

Gas

   43,544     7,713     18,182  

Petrochemical products

   2,174,014     3,736,603     3,231,426  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total export sales

  Ps. 687,677,634    Ps. 772,699,053    Ps. 772,965,362  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 5—CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:RESTRICTED CASH:

As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, cash and cash equivalents were as follows:

 

   2011   2010 

Cash on hand and in banks

  Ps.  97,384,703    Ps.   110,579,933  

Marketable securities

   17,150,508     20,720,919  

Restricted cash and cash equivalents(1)

   2,564,900     2,286,227  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps.   117,100,111    Ps.  133,587,079  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Cash on hand and in banks(i)

  Ps.45,942,338    Ps.76,201,010  

Marketable securities

   34,803,381     43,033,881  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps. 80,745,719    Ps. 119,234,891  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)In 2004, Petróleos Mexicanos signed an agency agreement establishing the Funds for Specific Purposes—Trade Commission (the “Trade Commission Funds”) with Banco Santander, S.A. as agent(i)Cash on hand and in order to manage certain funds transferred by the Mexican Government to Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entitiesbanks is primarily composed of cash in accordance with theLey de Ingresos de la Federación (Federal Revenue Law). These funds, which may be utilized only for infrastructure works related to exploration, refining, gas and petrochemicals in accordance with theLey de Presupuesto y Responsabilidad Hacendaria (Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability), increase the equity of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities.banks.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

At December 31, 2013, and 2012, restricted cash was as follows:

   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Restricted cash

  Ps. 7,701,798    Ps. 2,605,332  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Restricted cash in 2013 primarily increased due to the following: In December 2004, Corporación Mexicana de Mantenimiento Integral, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“COMMISA”) filed an arbitration claim before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (the “ICA”) against Pemex-Exploration and Production for, among other things, the breach of a construction agreement in connection with two platforms in the Cantarell project. Since the initiation of such claim, COMMISA and Pemex-Exploration and Production have filed several additional claims against one another. As a result of one of these additional claims, on September 25, 2013, the U.S. District Court ordered Pemex-Exploration and Production to deposit with COMMISA Ps. 6,081,706. Pemex-Exploration and Production subsequently deposited the judgment amount in a bank account in New York as a condition to filing a motion to appeal the resolution before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (See Note 23(b)).

NOTE 6—ACCOUNTS, NOTES RECEIVABLE AND OTHER:

As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, accounts and notes receivable and other receivables were as follows:

 

   2011   2010 

Export customers(1)

  Ps.61,402,274    Ps.39,398,026  

Domestic customers(1)

   48,783,438     35,412,605  

Negative IEPS Tax pending to be credited (Note 19)(1)

   19,665,432     6,031,103  

Tax credits

   9,321,409     16,585,577  

Sundry debtors

   7,951,295     10,573,269  

Employees and officers

   4,623,555     4,525,102  

Insurance claims(2)

   2,627,112     8,037,264  

Advances to suppliers

   1,830,758     1,628,580  

Other accounts receivable

   104,798     252,710  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   156,310,071     122,444,236  

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

   1,651,402     1,556,853  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps.  154,658,669    Ps.  120,887,383  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Export costumers

  Ps.46,337,045    Ps.40,717,458  

Domestic customers

   38,648,470     53,355,711  

Tax credits

   15,416,955     13,420,166  

Sundry debtors

   7,818,554     5,652,405  

Employee and officers

   5,077,687     4,773,466  

Negative IEPS Tax pending to be credit

   4,293,619     11,833,727  

Advances to suppliers

   3,284,575     1,801,231  

Insurance claims

   1,618,828     1,440,337  

Other account receivables

   16,278     15,010  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps. 122,512,011    Ps. 133,009,511  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table shows a breakdown of accounts receivable based on their credit history at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

(1)Increase primarily due to increases in the price of products sold.
(2)Decrease primarily due to a writedown of accounts receivable from insurance providers due to non-recoverability.
   Export Customers 
   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

1 to 30 days

  Ps.38,163    Ps.1,690,104  

31 to 60 days

   1,070     63,011  

61 to 90 days

   95     8,072  

More than 91 days

   385,887     149,165  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expired

   425,215     1,910,352  

Impaired (Reserved)

   —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unimpaired

   425,215     1,910,352  

Unexpired

   45,911,830     38,807,106  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  Ps. 46,337,045    Ps. 40,717,458  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

   Domestic Customers 
   As of December 31, 
   2013  2012 

1 to 30 days

  Ps.874,553   Ps.1,205,492  

31 to 60 days

   15,091    284,968  

61 to 90 days

   80,331    53,110  

More than 91 days

   223,009    1,079,711  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expired

   1,192,984    2,623,281  

Impaired (Reserved)

   (697,284  (1,059,215
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unimpaired

   495,700    1,564,066  

Unexpired

   38,152,770    51,791,645  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  Ps. 38,648,470   Ps. 53,355,711  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 7—INVENTORIES:

As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, inventories were as follows:

 

   2011   2010
(Note  3(ab)(i))
 

Crude oil, refined products, derivatives and petrochemical products

  Ps.  39,264,871    Ps.  35,219,676  

Materials and supplies in stock

   6,173,621     5,862,570  

Materials and products in transit

   268,872     220,479  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   45,707,364     41,302,725  

Less allowance for slow-moving and obsolete inventory

   1,554,902     783,859  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps.  44,152,462    Ps.  40,518,866  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Crude oil, refined products, derivatives and petrochemicals products

  Ps. 51,638,624    Ps. 51,058,073  

Materials and products in stock

   5,259,341     5,755,367  

Materials and products in transit

   16,535     34,130  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps. 56,914,500    Ps. 56,847,570  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 8—AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE INVESTMENTS IN EQUITY INSTRUMENTS:

In 2011, PMI HBV acquired 57,204,240 shares of Repsol, S.A. (formerly known as Repsol YPF, S.A. (“Repsol”, “Repsol”) at a cost of Ps. 20,783,820, which represented approximately 4.69% of Repsol’s share capital.

On June 19, 2012, Repsol approved a dividend program under which Repsol shareholders had the option to receive their pro rata portion of the dividend declared at the annual meeting in the form of either (i) new shares of Repsol or (ii) cash. On June 29, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos opted to receive its dividend in cash, which it received on July 13, 2012, while on July 9, 2012, PMI HBV received its dividend in the form of 2,600,191 new Repsol shares. As part of the same program, on January 21 and July 16, 2013, PMI HBV opted to receive dividends in the form of 1,683,322 and 1,506,130 new Repsol shares, respectively.

On August 9, 2013, PEMEX divested its direct interest in 9,289,968 shares of Repsol, which resulted in a net profit of Ps. 278,842. On the same date, PEMEX entered into an equity swap for the same number of shares with a notional amount of Ps. 2,869,882, pursuant to which PEMEX retains economic and voting rights in such shares (see Note 13(a)(iv)).

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the investments in 53,703,915 and 59,804,431 shares of Repsol were valued at Ps. 17,728,490 and Ps. 15,771,202, respectively. The effect of the valuation of the investment at fair value was recorded in other comprehensive result in the statement of changes in equity (deficit) as a gain of Ps. 4,453,495 at December 31, 2013 and a loss of Ps. 10,125,912 at December 31, 2012. In addition, to its direct legalPEMEX recorded dividend payments received from Repsol of Ps. 914,116 and beneficial ownershipPs. 685,704 in the statements of these shares, since 2008,comprehensive income at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, PEMEX has entered into and renewedheld three equity swaps with financial institutions pursuant tothrough which PEMEX hasit had obtained the economic and voting rights of 67,969,767 and 58,679,799 shares of Repsol, respectively, which amounted to an additional 58,679,799 Repsol shares, or approximately 5.13% and 4.80% of Repsol’s share capitaltotal shares, respectively (see Note 12(v))13).

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, PEMEX’s direct holdings of Repsol shares, together with the economic and voting rights acquired through the equity swaps mentioned above, increased PEMEX’s overall votingamounted to approximately 9.19% and economic rights in Repsol to 9.49%. of Repsol’s total shares, respectively. In addition, PEMEX holds one Repsol share through PMI-SES.

As of December 31, 2011, the investment in 57,204,240 shares of Repsol was valued at Ps. 24,655,980, and a Ps. 3,872,160 increase in the fair value of the investment was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) in the statement of equity. In addition, PEMEX received dividends of Ps. 599,907 in 2011, which were recorded under other revenues in the statement of operations. As of December 31, 2010, no investments were classified as available for sale.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

NOTE 9—PERMANENT INVESTMENTS IN SHARES OF NON-CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND OTHERS:ASSOCIATES:

The permanent investments in sharesassociates as of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliatesDecember 31, 2013 and others in 2011,2012, which were accounted for under the equity method, were as follows:

 

   Percentage  of
Investment
  Carrying value as of December 31, 
    2011   2010 

Deer Park Refining Limited(1)

   50.00 Ps.6,576,416    Ps.6,749,297  

Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   50.00  3,252,693     2,585,866  

Instalaciones Inmobiliarias para Industrias, S.A. de C.V.

   100.00  1,387,192     1,436,613  

Others—Net

   Various    1,697,063     344,304  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investments

   Ps.  12,913,364    Ps.  11,116,080  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Percentage of
Investment
   December 31, 
     2013   2012 

Deer Park Refining Limited

   50.00%    Ps.6,710,317    Ps.7,337,384  

Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   50.00%     4,051,682     3,530,632  

Petroquímica Mexicana de Vinilo, S.A. de C.V.(i)

   44.09%     3,253,978     —    

Instalaciones Inmobiliarias para Industrias, S.A. de C.V.(ii)

   100.00%     —       1,424,309  

Compañía Mexicana de Exploraciones, S.A. de C.V.(iii)

   60.00%     1,141,065     936,689  

Frontera Brownsville, LLC

   50.00%     517,945     535,653  

Mexicana de Lubricantes, S.A. de C.V.

   46.85%     488,321     509,265  

Other—net

   Various     616,193     372,331  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    Ps. 16,779,501    Ps. 14,646,263  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)(i)PMI NASA hasIn September 2013, through a 50% joint venture with Shell Oilbetween PEMEX and Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., PEMEX increased its investment in Petroquímica Mexicana de Vinilo, S.A. de C.V. by Ps. 2,993,531, allowing PEMEX to acquire a 44% interest in the company.
(ii)As of 2013, Instalaciones Inmobilarias para Industrias, S.A. de C.V. is considered a Subsidiary Company and is, therefore, included in the consolidated financial statements of PEMEX and no longer accounted for as a permanent investment in an associate under the operationequity method. In 2012, it was not included in the consolidated financial statements of PEMEX because it was immaterial.
(iii)Compañía refinery locatedMexicana de Exploraciones, S.A. de C.V. is not controlled by PEMEX and is accounted for as a permanent investment in Deer Park, Texas.an associate under the equity method (see Note 3(a)).

Profit (loss) sharing in associates:

   For the year ended December 31, 

Profit (loss) sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others:

  2011  2010  2009 

Deer Park Refining Limited

  Ps.(68,651 Ps.923,129   Ps.  (1,363,510

Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   221,148    347,979    402,871  

Instalaciones Inmobiliarias para Industrias, S.A. de C.V.

   (49,421  51,859    72,023  

Terrenos para Industrias, S.A.

   (788,109  (43  24  

Others—Net

   (111,365  217,764    121,364  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total profit (loss) sharing, net

  Ps.  (796,398 Ps.  1,540,688   Ps.(767,228
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   December 31, 
   2013  2012   2011 

Deer Park Refining Limited

  Ps. (591,472 Ps. 1,320,180    Ps.80,480  

Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   475,942    548,765     221,148  

Petroquímica Mexicana de Vinilo, S.A. de C.V.

   93,853    —       —    

Others—Net

   728,387    2,928,662     (1,112,381
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  Ps.706,710   Ps. 4,797,607    Ps.(810,753
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

The following tables show condensed financial information of major investments recognized under the equity method:

Condensed Statements of Financial Position

   Deer Park Refining Limited   Gasoductos de Chihuahua,
S. de R.L. de C.V.
 
  December 31,
2013
   December 31,
2012
   December 31,
2013
   December 31,
2012
 

Total assets

  Ps. 27,331,336    Ps.23,237,327    Ps. 9,006,292    Ps.8,007,571  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   13,910,702     8,562,558     902,928     946,306  

Total equity

   13,420,634     14,674,769     8,103,364     7,061,265  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  Ps. 27,331,336    Ps.23,237,327    Ps. 9,006,292    Ps.8,007,571  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income

  Deer Park Refining Limited  Gasoductos de Chihuahua, S. de R.L. de C.V. 
  December 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
  December 31,
2011
  December 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
  December 31,
2011
 

Sales and other income

 Ps.9,767,622   Ps.12,240,553   Ps.11,766,416   Ps. 2,124,812   Ps.1,984,198   Ps.1,592,555  

Costs and expenses

  10,950,566    9,600,192    11,605,456    1,172,927    886,669    1,150,260  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net result

 Ps.(1,182,944 Ps.2,640,361   Ps.160,960   Ps.951,885   Ps.1,097,529   Ps.442,295  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

NOTE 10—WELLS, PIPELINES, PROPERTIES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:

As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, the components of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment were as follows:

 

  Plants  Drilling
Equipment
  Pipelines  Wells  Buildings  Offshore
platforms
  Furniture and
Equipment
  Transportation
Equipment
  Construction in
progress
  Land  Unproductive
fixed assets
  Total fixed assets 

Investment

            

Balances as of January 1, 2010

 Ps.423,699,655   Ps.25,713,299   Ps.308,025,098   Ps.678,534,523   Ps.55,713,562   Ps.189,729,705   Ps.39,587,111   Ps.18,437,579   Ps.111,552,872   Ps.39,696,348   Ps.1,035,243   Ps.1,891,724,995  

Acquisitions

  27,434,787    1,384,900    10,639,264    122,417,302    2,042,644    15,806,565    3,021,039    500,794    23,488,587    1,821,959    29,529    208,587,370  

Unsuccessful wells

                                  (5,276,181          (5,276,181

Disposals

  (6,541,896  (681,478  (234,161      (166,236      (481,099  (180,247  (951,338  (277,010  41,213    (9,472,252

Impairment

              (11,689,832                              (11,689,832

Reversal of impairment

              1,731,229                                1,731,229  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2010

  444,592,546    26,416,721    318,430,201    790,993,222    57,589,970    205,536,270    42,127,051    18,758,126    128,813,940    41,241,297    1,105,985    2,075,605,329  

Acquisitions

  43,304,327    893,261    11,487,532    92,823,859    3,391,129    12,027,598    4,724,091    3,621,456    14,772,393    343,561    1,174,778    188,563,985  

Unsuccessful wells

                                  (7,886,262          (7,886,262

Disposals

  (10,415,016      (1,151,289      (216,030      (535,193  (2,064,241      (138,781  (373,016  (14,893,566

Reversal of impairment

              11,689,832                                11,689,832  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2011

  477,481,857    27,309,982    328,766,444    895,506,913    60,765,069    217,563,868    46,315,949    20,315,341    135,700,071    41,446,077    1,907,747    2,253,079,318  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

            

Balances as of January 1, 2010

  (226,111,015  (18,325,912  (169,721,556  (381,739,906  (30,707,770  (58,438,841  (26,954,970  (12,133,525              (924,133,495

Acquisitions

  (14,424,415  (785,501  (7,445,578  (61,655,112  (1,379,606  (7,271,620  (2,521,438  (998,511              (96,481,781

Disposals

  5,498,456        172,508        96,785        456,520    173,579                6,397,848  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2010

  (235,036,974  (19,111,413  (176,994,626  (443,395,018  (31,990,591  (65,710,461  (29,019,888  (12,958,457              (1,014,217,428

Acquisitions

  (15,870,532  (922,672  (7,591,292  (56,495,158  (1,413,610  (7,909,708  (2,730,002  (1,030,756              (93,963,730

Disposals

  8,104,094        669,495        156,772        510,219    1,956,228                11,396,808  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2011

  (242,803,412  (20,034,085  (183,916,423  (503,679,464  (33,247,429  (73,620,169  (31,239,671  (12,032,985              (1,100,573,638

Net wells, pipelines, properties,
plant and equipment as of December 31, 2010

 Ps.209,555,572   Ps.7,305,308   Ps.141,435,575   Ps.347,598,204   Ps.25,599,379   Ps.139,825,809   Ps.13,107,163   Ps.5,799,669   Ps.128,813,940   Ps.41,241,297   Ps.1,105,985   Ps.1,061,387,901  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net wells, pipelines, properties,
plant and equipment as of December 31, 2011

 Ps.234,678,445   Ps.7,275,897   Ps.144,850,021   Ps.391,827,449   Ps.27,517,640   Ps.143,943,699   Ps.15,076,278   Ps.8,282,356   Ps.135,700,071   Ps.41,446,077   Ps. 1,907,747   Ps.1,152,505,680  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Unaudited (in thousands of
U.S. dollars) as of
December 31, 2011
 U.S.  $16,774,248   U.S.   $520,064   U.S.   $10,353,530   U.S.   $28,006,880   U.S.   $1,966,894   U.S.   $10,288,748   U.S.   $1,077,616   U.S.   $592,003   U.S.   $9,699,513   U.S.   $2,962,465   U.S.   $136,361   U.S.   $82,378,322  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Plants  Drilling
Equipment
  Pipelines  Wells  Buildings  Offshore
platforms
  Furniture
and
Equipment
  Transportation
Equipment
  Construction
in progress
  Land  Unproductive
fixed assets
  Other
fixed
assets
  Total 

INVESTMENT

             

Balances as of January 1, 2012

 Ps.640,476,821    39,551,408    545,183,035    882,779,891    61,084,265    298,983,863    45,199,722    20,003,935    125,148,670    41,623,977    8,422,839    —      2,708,458,426  

Acquisitions

  28,345,950    3,382,577    3,034,148    52,636,412    810,283    6,095,841    4,584,555    1,253,739    107,171,303    97,877    12,737    152,844    207,578,266  

Capitalization and reclassifications

  46,045,271    (566,879  1,596,719    72,039,394    (9,355,395  14,558,538    (71,555  (130,141  (131,010,580  (3,611  3,673,967    (125,211  (3,349,483

Disposals

  (5,119,828  —      (2,577,283  —      899,856    —      75,563    (536,840  3,993,884    (135,072  (961,129  —      (4,360,849
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2012

  709,748,214    42,367,106    547,236,619    1,007,455,697    53,439,009    319,638,242    49,788,285    20,590,693    105,303,277    41,583,171    11,148,414    27,633    2,908,326,360  

Acquisitions

  29,336,696    3,106,174    5,387,150    62,580,630    1,965,492    5,633,305    3,644,600    3,701,628    134,079,686    1,100,230    1,104,295    4,929    251,644,815  

Capitalization and reclassifications

  10,174,501    (433,975  7,875,199    56,885,847    5,761,369    1,115,273    (1,072,347  (99,191  (85,903,444  (23,662  264,810    —      (5,455,620

Impairment

  1,650,664    —      —      (26,364,717  —      —      —      —      (894,782  —      —      —      (25,608,835

Disposals

  (15,360,225  —      (2,057,115  —      (903,509  (62,212  (424,245  (875,443  (3,154,696  (301,882  (2,249,721  —      (25,389,048
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2013

 Ps.735,549,850    45,039,305    558,441,853    1,100,557,457    60,262,361    326,324,608    51,936,293    23,317,687    149,430,041    42,357,857    10,267,798    32,562    3,103,517,672  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

             

Balances as of January 1, 2012

 Ps. (254,138,741)    (20,707,896  (187,966,009  (491,889,237  (33,557,438  (79,411,627  (30,120,584  (11,727,040  —      —      (6,515,091  —      (1,116,033,663

Depreciation

  (32,672,945  (2,868,400  (16,964,385  (67,857,495  (1,465,645  (14,284,606  (3,159,986  (1,264,258  —      —      —      —      (140,537,720

Reclassifications

  (139,324  510,016    2,834,880    (6,141  1,220,599    (1,441,319  430,999    119,497    —      —      (177,427  —      3,351,780  

Disposals

  2,663,300    —      2,810    —      78,604    —      286,377    537,127    —      —      59,110    —      3,627,328  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2012

  (284,287,710  (23,066,280  (202,092,704  (559,752,873  (33,723,880  (95,137,552  (32,563,194  (12,334,674  —      —      (6,633,408  —      (1,249,592,275

Depreciation

  (36,154,914  (2,790,948  (16,457,891  (71,831,243  (1,779,543  (14,669,152  (3,468,615  (1,339,398  —      —      —      —      (148,491,704

Reclassifications

  2,513,262    358,288    1,290,514    1,153    (84,961  —      1,230,624    146,740    —      —      —      —      5,455,620  

Disposals

  8,267,723    —      1,409,767    —      519,279    —      297,756    903,404    —      —      (708,501  —      10,689,428  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2013

 Ps. (309,661,639)    (25,498,940  (215,850,314  (631,582,963  (35,069,105  (109,806,704  (34,503,429  (12,623,928  —      —      (7,341,909  —      (1,381,938,931
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment—net as of December 31, 2012

 Ps.425,460,504    19,300,826    345,143,915    447,702,824    19,715,129    224,500,690    17,225,091    8,256,019    105,303,277    41,583,171    4,515,006    27,633    1,658,734,085  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment—net as of December 31, 2013

 Ps.425,888,211    19,540,365    342,591,539    468,974,494    25,193,256    216,517,904    17,432,864    10,693,759    149,430,041    42,357,857    2,925,889    32,562    1,721,578,741  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Depreciation rates

  4  5  3  —      3  4  10  5  —      —      —      —      —    

Estimated useful lives

  25 years    20 years    33 years    —      33 years    25 years    10 years    20 years    —      —      —      —      —    

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

a.As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, the CFRfinancing cost identified with fixed assets in the construction or installation stage, capitalized as part of the value of such fixed assets, was Ps. 5,634,9812,943,597, Ps. 2,110,075 and Ps. 564,691,5,634,981 respectively.

 

b.The combined depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of wells for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, recognized in operating costs, was Ps. 97,753,018,148,491,704, Ps. 96,481,781140,537,720 and Ps. 76,890,687,127,380,409, respectively, which includes costs related to dismantlementplugging and abandonment of wells for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 of Ps. 2,966,836,2,000,230, Ps. 1,495,3102,053,630 and Ps. 1,648,884, respectively.2,966,836, respectively (see Note 3(h)).

 

c.As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010, the capitalized portion of2012, provisions relating to future dismantlementplugging and abandonment costs net of accumulated amortization, and determined based on the present value (discounted) of the project cost, wasamounted to Ps. 42,507,00246,118,080 and Ps. 37,698,629, respectively.48,153,060, respectively, and are presented in the “Provisions for sundry credits” line item.

 

d.As of December 31, 2011, based on an analysis2013, the value in use of existing conditionsthe Integral Burgos and Macuspana projects were unfavorable due to the decline in gas prices in the Burgos project,international market as well as the compositioncondition of itseconomic hydrocarbon reserves the valuelocated at these projects, which resulted in impairment charges of the project was determined to have improved, permitting the reversal of an impairment chargePs. (25,432,038) and Ps. (932,679), respectively, that waswere recognized in 2010the consolidated statements of comprehensive income under the other revenues and expenses—net line item.

As a result of the sale of certain properties and plants of the Pajaritos petrochemical complex by Pemex-Petrochemicals to Petroquímica Mexicana de Vinilo, S.A. de C.V., value in use for the complex was favorable, reducing the impairment charge for previous years by Ps. 1,650,664. This reduction in impairment charges was offset by additional impairment charges totaling Ps. (894,782) due to the identification of additional impaired assets.

e.During 2008, PEMEX entered into certain capital lease arrangements for tankers. These leases expire on various dates over the next 9 years.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, assets acquired through these capital leases were as follows:

   2013  2012 

Investment in tankers and drilling equipment

  Ps. 5,870,050   Ps. 3,075,142  

Less accumulated depreciation

   (636,276  (513,123
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Ps. 5,233,774   Ps. 2,562,019  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The liabilities relating to the assets listed above are payable in the years following December 31, 2013 as presented below:

Year

  Pesos   U.S. dollars 

2014

  Ps.761,941    U.S. $58,268  

2015

   741,863     56,733  

2016

   741,863     56,733  

2017

   741,863     56,733  

2018

   681,643     52,127  

2019 and later

   1,184,622     90,592  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   4,853,795     371,186  

Less: Short-term unaccrued interest

   239,772     18,336  

Less: Long-term unaccrued interest

   664,118     50,787  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital leases

   3,949,905     302,063  

Less: Current portion of leases

   522,167     39,932  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term capital leases

  Ps. 3,427,738    U.S. $262,131  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The capitalized interest expense from financial leases for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was Ps. 159,380, Ps. 214,041 and Ps. 212,497, respectively.

The discount rates applied to the calculation of capitalized leases were as follows:

i.7.96% rate in the amountnominal terms (3.83% in real terms as of Ps. 11,689,832. In addition, during 2010, the development of the Lakash project in the Holok Temoa asset was begun, which improved the economic condition of the asset and permitted the reversal in 2010 of an impairment charge in the amount of Ps. 1,731,229 that was originally recognized in 2009.For the year ended December 31, 2011, no impairment was recognized.2013);

ii.9.39% rate in nominal terms (5.62% in real terms as of December 31, 2012); and

iii.10.46% rate in nominal terms (6.40% in real terms as of December 31, 2011).

NOTE 11—OTHER ASSETS:

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance of other assets was as follows:

   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Construction in progress (wells)

  Ps.7,892,474    Ps.5,306,333  

Payments in advance

   2,244,450     3,290,756  

Other

   4,057,786     3,750,746  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps. 14,194,710    Ps. 12,347,835  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   As of December 31, 
   2013  2012 

Construction in progress (wells):

   

Balance at the beginning of period

  Ps.5,306,333   Ps.9,552,703  

Additions to construction in progress

   21,813,041    18,945,289  

Deductions against expenses

   (9,244,399  (11,889,271

Deductions against fixed assets

   (9,982,501  (11,302,388
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at the end of period

  Ps.7,892,474   Ps.5,306,333  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

NOTE 12—DEBT:

The Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos approves the terms and conditions for the incurrence of obligations that constitute public debt of Petróleos Mexicanos for each fiscal year, in accordance with the Petróleos Mexicanos Law and the Regulations to the Petróleos Mexicanos Law. These terms and conditions are promulgated in conformity with the guidelines approved by the SHCP for Petróleos Mexicanos for the respective fiscal year.

During 2013, the significant financing activities of PEMEX were as follows:

a.On January 22, 2013, the SHCP authorized the increase of the Petróleos Mexicanos’ Medium-Term Notes Program from U.S. $22,000,000 to U.S. $32,000,000.

b.On January 30, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $2,100,000 of its 3.500% Notes due 2023. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $32,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

c.On January 4 and 11, 2013, PMI Trading obtained and repaid, respectively, a loan for U.S. $150,000 bearing interest at 1.0412%.

d.On February 28, 2013, PMI NASA obtained two loans for U.S. $34,500, each of which bears interest at 3.80% and matures on February 7, 2023.

e.On March 22, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 2,500,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2017 at a floating rate, which was the first reopening of the securities originally issued on November 29, 2012. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000 orUnidades de Inversión (“UDI”) equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

f.On March 6 and 8, 2013, PMI Trading obtained and repaid, respectively, a loan for U.S. $50,000 bearing interest at 1.4217%.

g.On April 26, 2013, PMI NASA obtained a loan for U.S. $33,830 bearing interest at 3.80%, which matures on February 22, 2023.

h.On June 7, 2013, PMI NASA obtained a loan for U.S. $34,278 bearing interest at 3.80%, which matures on April 24, 2023.

i.On June 25, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps.2,500,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2017 at a floating rate, which was the second reopening of the securities originally issued on November 29, 2012. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

j.On June 26, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed U.S. $500,000 under its revolving credit facility with Credit Agricole CIB, which was repaid on July 17, 2013.

k.

On July 18, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $3,000,000 of its debt securities under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $32,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C in four tranches: (i) U.S. $1,000,000 of its 4.875% Notes due 2024; (ii) U.S. $1,000,000 of its 3.500% Notes due 2018; (iii) U.S. $500,000 of its Floating Rate Notes due 2018; and (iv) U.S. $500,000 of its 6.500% Bonds due 2041, which was the second

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

reopening of its 6.500% Bonds due 2041 originally issued on June 2, 2011 and subsequently reopened on October 18, 2011. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

l.On September 19, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $400,000 of notes due 2024, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.830%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

m.On September 19, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 5,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 at a floating rate. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000 or UDI equivalent Certificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

n.On September 26, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued Ps. 10,400,000 aggregate amount of Certificados Bursátiles due 2024 at a fixed rate of 7.19%, consisting of (1) an international offering outside Mexico of Ps.1,075,000 of Certificados Bursátiles in the form of global depositary notes (“GDNs”), and (2) a concurrent offering to the public in Mexico of Ps. 9,325,000 of Certificados Bursátiles not represented by GDNs. These certificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000 or UDI equivalent Certificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

o.On September 30, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $750,000 of notes due 2024, which bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for 3 months plus 0.43%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

p.On November 4, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $350,000 of notes due 2024, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.290%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

q.On November 27, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos issued €1,300,000 of its 3.125% Notes due 2020. These notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $32,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

r.On December 11, 2013 Petróleos Mexicanos issued Ps. 8,500,000 aggregate principal amount ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 at a fixed rate of 7.19%, consisting of (i) an international offering outside of Mexico of Ps. 1,165,550 ofCertificados Bursátiles in the form of GDNs, and (ii) a concurrent offering to the public in Mexico of Ps.7,334,450 ofCertificados Bursátiles not represented by GDNs. The issuance represented the first reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 originally issued on September 26, 2013. Concurrently, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 1,100,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 at a floating rate, which was a reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 originally issued on September 19, 2013. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

s.On December 11, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a revolving credit facility in the amount of U.S. $1,250,000; the facility bears interest at a floating rate linked to LIBOR and matures in 2016.

t.On December 19, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed Ps. 10,000,000 from its revolving credit facility with Banco Santander, S.A., which it repaid on December 30, 2013.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

u.On December 27, 2013, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed U.S. $135,000 from its revolving credit facility with Credit Agricole CIB, which it repaid on January 27, 2014.

v.From January 1 to December 31, 2013, PMI HBV obtained U.S. $5,793,000 from its revolving credit line and repaid U.S. $6,143,000.

During 2012, the significant financing activities of PEMEX were as follows:

 

 a.From January 1 to December 31, 2011,2012, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained U.S. $1,081,805$300,000 of loans or credit lines made or guaranteed by export credit agencies.

 

 b.During 2011, PMI Trading borrowed and repaid an aggregate amount of US $2,689,000 under its US $500,000 syndicated revolving credit line with international banks and Credit Agricole CIB, as administrative agent. As of December 31, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility.

c.On FebruaryJanuary 24, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos made a final borrowing of Ps. 3,750,000 under its Ps. 3,750,000 revolving credit facility entered into in September 2009, at a floating rate. The facility matured in August 2011.

d.On March 15, 2011,2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued in the Mexican market, Ps. 10,000,000U.S. $2,100,000 ofcertificados bursátiles(publicly traded notes) accruing interest at a floating rate, which mature in 2016. These its 4.875% Notes due 2022. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 140,000,000 or equivalent inUnidades de Inversion (UDIs)Certificados BursátilesDual Program.U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

c.On February 14, 2012, PMI NASA obtained four direct loans for a total amount of U.S. $143,945 bearing interest at 3.50% fixed rate, all of which mature in December 2021.

d.On March 12, 2012, PMI NASA obtained a direct loan for U.S. $37,998 bearing interest at 3.8% fixed rate, which matures on January 27, 2022.

 

 e.On May 11, 2011,March 28, 2012, PMI NASATrading obtained a bank loan for U.S. $39,000$125,000 bearing interest at a floating1.8635% fixed rate, which matureswas repaid on May 11, 2021. As of December 31, 2011, the amount outstanding under this loan was U.S. $37,245.April 12, 2012.

 

 f.On May 16, 2011,March 29, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a bank loan for Ps. 2,352,000,1,300,000 bearing interest at 5.264%, which maturedwas repaid on June 16, 2011.April 12, 2012.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

 g.On June 2, 2011,April 10, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,250,000CHF 300,000 of its 6.500% Bonds2.50% Notes due 2041; the bonds2019. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

 

 h.On June 15, 2011, PMI HBV obtained a U.S. $1,000,000 syndicated revolving credit line with international banks and Credit Agricole CIB as administrative agent. During 2011, PMI HBV borrowed, in the aggregate, U.S. $3,133,000 and repaid U.S. $2,383,000 under this facility. As of December 31, 2011, the amount outstanding under this facility was U.S. $750,000.

i.On JulyApril 26, 2011,2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,000,000AUD 150,000 of its 5.50%6.125% Notes due 2021; the issuance was a reopening, and the2017. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. The notes were guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and Pemex-Refining.

j.On September 1, 2011, PMI HBV borrowed €799,252 at a floating rate under a syndicated loan due in August 2014, which was used to partially finance the acquisition of the Repsol shares described in Note 8 and the related stock options described in Note 12(v). The loan is secured by the shares acquired, and will amortize in three equal installments due on the first through third anniversary dates of the transaction.

k.On September 9, 2011, PMI HBV obtained a bank loan for Ps. 50,000 bearing interest at 4.91%, which matured on November 8, 2011.

l.On September 12, 2011, the CNBV authorized Petróleos Mexicanos to increase itsCertificados BursátilesDual Program from Ps. 140,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs to Ps. 200,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs.

m.Effective September 14, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into amendments to its U.S. $2,000,000 syndicated term credit facility and U.S. $1,250,000 revolving credit facility, each originally entered into on November 18, 2010, to reduce the margin over the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) for borrowings thereunder and, in the case of the revolving credit facility, to reduce the commitment fees payable thereunder, in each case to reflect improved market conditions. During 2011, no amount was borrowed by Petróleos Mexicanos under the syndicated revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2011, no debt was outstanding under the syndicated revolving credit facility and U.S. $2,000,000 (originally borrowed in 2010) remained outstanding under the syndicated term credit facility.

n.On October 3, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the domestic Mexican market, approximately Ps. 9,999,999 ofcertificados bursátiles in two tranches: the first in the amount of Ps. 7,000,000 which bears interest at a variable rate and matures in 2017, and the second in the amount of 653,381 UDIs at an exchange rate of 4.591503 pesos per UDI, which bears interest at a rate of 3.55% and matures in 2021. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 200,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIsCertificados BursátilesDual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

 

 o.i.On OctoberMay 11, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for Ps. 405,000 bearing interest at 5.070%, which was repaid on May 18, 2011,2012.

j.On May 16,2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for Ps. 2,329,000 bearing interest at 5.050%, which was repaid on May 23, 2012.

k.On May 31, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for Ps. 2,833,000 bearing interest at 5.160%, which was repaid on June 6, 2012.

l.On June 26, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,250,000$1,750,000 of its 6.500%5.50% Bonds due 2041; the2044. The bonds were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C and will be consolidated to form a single series with the 6.500% Bonds due 2041 issued by Petróleos Mexicanos in June 2011.

p.

On December 7, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos issued Ps. 10,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.650%certificados bursátiles due 2021, consisting of (i) an international offering outside Mexico of

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Ps. 7,000,000 ofcertificados bursátilesin the form of global depositary notes (GDNs), and (ii) a concurrent offering to the public in Mexico of Ps. 3,000,000 ofcertificados bursátiles not represented by GDNs. Thecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 200,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIsCertificados BursátilesDual Program.C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

q.On December 29, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a bilateral export credit agency loan for U.S. $200,000 at a floating rate, which matures in December 2016.

r.On December 29, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into, in the Mexican market, a bank loan agreement for Ps. 7,000,000, which matures in December 2016. Of the total amount available, Ps. 3,500,000 had been disbursed at December 31, 2011.

During 2010, the significant financing activities of PEMEX were as follows:

a.From January 1 to December 31, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained U.S. $2,996,922 in nominal terms in loans or credit lines made or guaranteed by export credit agencies.

b.On January 7, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained, in the domestic market, loan of Ps. 3,750,000 at a variable rate; the loan matured in September 2011.

c.In January 2010, PMI Trading obtained a syndicated revolving credit line with international banks and Credit Agricole CIB, as administrative agent. The objective of this U.S. $500,000 credit line is to finance the trading activities of PMI Trading. During 2010, PMI Trading borrowed and repaid an aggregate amount of U.S. $4,885,000 under this facility, although no more than U.S. $450,000 was outstanding at any time. As of December 31, 2010, no debt was outstanding under this credit line.

d.On February 5, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,000,000 of its 6.00% Notes due 2020 under its U.S. $12,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. The notes are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

e.On February 8, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the domestic Mexican market, Ps. 14,999,999 ofcertificados bursátiles in three tranches: one accruing interest at a variable rate for Ps. 7,959,779, which matures in 2015; the second accruing interest at a fixed rate for Ps. 5,000,000, which matures in 2020; and the third accruing interest at a fixed rate of 4.2% for 465,236 UDIs, at an exchange rate of 4.385347 pesos per UDI, which matures in 2020. These notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 140,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIsCertificados BursátilesDual Program.

f.On February 26, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued CHF 150,000 of its 3.50% Notes due 2014; the issuance was a reopening, and the notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $12,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. The notes are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

g.On May 17, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 14,999,999 ofcertificados bursátiles in three tranches: one at a variable rate for Ps. 8,500,000, which matures in 2014; the second at a fixed rate for Ps. 5,000,000, which matures in 2020 (a reopening of a fixed rate tranche issued in February 2010); and the third at a fixed rate of 4.2% for 337,671 UDIs, at an exchange rate of 4.442195 pesos per UDI, which matures in 2020 (a reopening of a fixed rate tranche issued in February 2010). These notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 140,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIsCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program.

h.On June 24, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained U.S. $990,000 from the revolving credit line it entered in 2007 with a syndicate of commercial banks.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

i.On July 21, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $2,000,000 of its 5.50% Notes due 2021 under its U.S. $12,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. The notes are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

j.On August 30, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,000,000 of its 6.625% Notes due 2035 under its U.S. $12,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. The notes are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals. These notes are a reopening of the notes issued on June 8, 2005.

k.On September 28, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $750,000 of its 6.625% Perpetual Bonds under its U.S. $12,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. The bonds are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

l.On October 20, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos issued an additional U.S. $250,000 of its 6.625% Perpetual Bonds under its U.S. $12,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C, through a reopening of the bonds issued on September 28, 2010. The bonds are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

 

 m.On November 18, 2010,July 6, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a syndicated credit line forissued two series of notes in the amount of U.S. $2,000,000 bearing$400,000 each, which bear interest at a variablefixed rate of 2.0% and with a final maturity1.95%, respectively, and mature in 2016. On December 10, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed2022. The notes are guaranteed by Export-Import Bank of the full amount of this credit facility.United States.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

 n.On NovemberJuly 18, 2010,2012 Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a bilateral export credit agency loan for U.S. $300,000 which bears interest at a floating rate linked to LIBOR and matures in July 2017.

o.On July 26, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $400,000 of notes maturing December 2022, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 1.70%. The notes are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

p.On July 5 and 6, 2012, PMI Trading obtained and repaid, respectively, a loan for U.S. $40,000 bearing interest at a rate of 1.6981%.

q.On October 19, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $1,000,000 of its 5.50% Bonds due 2044, which was a reopening of the bonds issued on June 26, 2012. The bonds were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

r.On October 30, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos entered into a revolving credit facility in the amount of U.S. $1,250,000; the facility bears interest at a floating rate. The facilityrate linked to LIBOR and matures in 20132017. No disbursements have been made under this facility.

s.On November 16, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for U.S. $50,000 bearing interest at 1.0272%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

t.On November 23, 2012, the CNBV authorized Petróleos Mexicanos to increase itsCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program from Ps. 200,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs to Ps.300,000,000 or its equivalent in UDIs.

u.On November 28, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for U.S. $70,000 bearing interest at 1.0332%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

v.On November 29, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for U.S. $45,000 bearing interest at 1.0362%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

w.On November 29, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for Ps. 806,000 bearing interest at 5.0462%, which was repaid on November 30, 2012.

x.On November 29, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 25,000,000 ofCertificados Bursátiles in three tranches: one at a floating rate for Ps. 11,500,000, which matures in 2017; the second at a fixed rate of 3.02% for 721,564 UDIs, equivalent to Ps. 3,500,000, which matures in 2028; and can be extended twicethe third at a fixed rate for Ps. 10,000,000, which was a period of one year per extension with the agreementreopening of the lenders.securities issued on December 7, 2011 and matures in 2021. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000 or UDI equivalentCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

y.On December 21, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a direct loan in the domestic market for Ps. 2,000,000 bearing interest at 6.55%, which matures on December 21, 2022.

z.On December 28, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for Ps. 2,600,000 bearing interest at 5.0475%, which was repaid on January 11, 2013.

aa.On December 31, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for U.S. $50,000 bearing interest at 1.4574%, which was repaid on January 14, 2013.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

bb.During 2012, PMI HBV obtained U.S. $18,225,000 from its revolving credit line and repaid U.S. $17,325,000. As of December 31, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos had not borrowed any funds2012, the amount outstanding under this credit facility.facility was U.S. $900,000.

As of December 31, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos had U.S. $3,268,634 in available lines of credit in order to ensure liquidity.

Various financial transactions (including credit facilities and bond issuances) require compliance with various covenants that, among other things, place restrictions on the following types of transactions by PEMEX, subject to certain exceptions:

 

the sale of substantial assets essential for the continued operations of its business;

 

the incurrence of liens against its assets; and

 

transfers, sales or assignments of rights to payment not yet earned under contracts for the sale of crude oil or natural gas, accounts receivable or other negotiable instruments.

As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012 and as of the date of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements, PEMEX was in compliance with the covenants described above.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010,2013, long-term debt was as follows:

 

        December 31, 2011  December 31, 2010 
   

Rate of Interest(1)

  

Maturity

 Pesos
(thousands)
  Foreign currency
(thousands)
  Pesos
(thousands)
  Foreign currency
(thousands)
 

U.S. dollars:

        

Bonds

  Fixed from 4.875% to 9.5% and LIBOR plus 0.6%  Various to 2042  Ps.  271,044,468    19,373,604    Ps.  199,274,719    16,126,334  

Purchasing loans and project financing

  LIBOR plus 0.125% to 0.5% Fixed from 2.45% to 6.64% and LIBOR plus 1.71%  Various to 2022  120,546,152    8,616,348    111,907,372    9,056,119  

Direct loans

  Fixed at 5.44% and LIBOR plus 1.0% to 1.9%  Various to 2018  4,896,640    350,000    2,224,278    180,000  

Syndicated loans

  LIBOR plus 0.475% and 1.5% and Fixed from 1.498% to 1.6906%  Various to 2016  76,963,370    5,501,155    77,231,875    6,250,000  

Bank loans

  LIBOR plus 1.88%  2021  521,073    37,245          

Financial leases(2)

  Fixed from 7.96% to 8%  2019  3,405,929    243,448    3,345,720    270,753  
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total financing in U.S. dollars

      477,377,632    34,121,800    393,983,964    31,883,206  

Euros:

        

Bonds

  Fixed from 5.5% to 6.375%  Various to 2025  64,466,225    3,550,000    58,835,215    3,550,000  

Secured loan

  EURIBOR plus 5.37%  2014  14,514,015    799,252          

Project financing

  Fixed at 2%  2016  2,496    137    3,155    190  
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total financing in Euros

      78,982,736    4,349,389    58,838,370    3,550,190  

Japanese yen:

        

Direct loans

  LIBOR yen plus 0.71%  2014  3,798,236    20,950,000    6,393,940    41,900,000  

Bonds

  Fixed at 3.5% and LIBOR yen plus 0.75%  Various to 2023  17,042,200    94,000,000    14,344,400    94,000,000  

Project financing

  Fixed at 2.9079% and Prime Rate yen plus 0.56%  Various to 2017  8,159,010    45,002,814    8,250,194    54,064,178  
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total financing in yen

      28,999,446    159,952,814    28,988,534    189,964,178  

Continued on following page.
       December 31, 2013 
  

Rate of Interest(1)

 Maturity  Pesos
(thousands)
  Foreign currency
(thousands)
 

U.S. dollars:

    

Bonds

 Fixed from 1.7% to 9.5% and LIBOR plus 0.43% to 2.2%  Various to 2045   Ps. 407,719,934    31,179,592  

Purchasing loans

 LIBOR plus 0.4% to 0.5%  Various to 2014    12,520    957  

Project financing

 Fixed from 2.45% to 5.45% and LIBOR plus .01% to 1.71%  Various to 2022    75,603,945    5,781,665  

Direct loans

 Fixed at 5.44% and LIBOR plus 1.0% to 1.20%  Various to 2018    10,981,118    839,760  

Syndicated loans

 LIBOR plus 0.8% and 1%  Various to 2016    27,918,337    2,135,001  

Bank loans

 Fixed from 3.5% to 5.28%  Various to 2022    4,032,468    308,375  

Financial leases (Note 10(e))

 Fixed from 0.37% to 1.99%  Various to 2023    3,949,905    302,061  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total financing in U.S. dollars

    530,218,227    40,547,411  

Euros:

    

Bonds

 Fixed from 5.5% to 6.375%  Various to 2025    78,073,403    4,332,742  

Secured loan

 EURIBOR plus 5.37%  Various to 2014    4,779,802    265,259  

Project financing

 Fixed at 2%  Various to 2016    569    32  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total financing in Euros

    82,853,774    4,598, 033  

Japanese yen:

    

Direct loans

 LIBOR yen plus 0.71%  Various to 2014    2,608,275    20,950,000  

Bonds

 Fixed at 3.5% and LIBOR yen plus 0.75%  Various to 2023    11,703,000    94,000,000  

Project financing

 Fixed at 2.90% and Prime Rate yen plus 1% to 2%  Various to 2017    3,346,571    26,880,086  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total financing in yen

    17,657,846    141,830,086  

Pesos:

    

Certificados bursátiles

 Mexican Federal Treasury Certificates (“Cetes”) plus 0.57%,Tasa de Interés Interbancaria de Equilibrio (TIIE)(1)less 0.07% to 0.7%, and Fixed at 7.19% to 9.91%  Various to 2024    132,159,337   

Direct loans

 Fixed at 6.55% and TIIE plus 0.55% to 2.4%  Various to 2022    6,479,741   
   

 

 

  

Total financing in pesos

    138,639,078   

Unidades de Inversión Certificados Bursátiles

 Zero rate and Fixed at 3.02% to 4.2%  Various to 2028    26,746,411   

Other currencies:

    

Bonds

 Fixed from 2.5% to 8.25%  Various to 2022    21,031,855   
   

 

 

  

Total principal in pesos(2)

    817,147,191   

Plus: Accrued interest

    9,815,002   

Notes payable to contractors(3)

    14,278,221   
   

 

 

  

Total principal and interest

    841,240,414   

Less: Short-term maturities

    72,450,283   

Current portion of notes payable to contractors(3)

    8,411,658   

Accrued interest

    9,815,002   
   

 

 

  

Total short-term debt

    90,676,943   
   

 

 

  

Long-term debt (Note 13(c))

   Ps. 750,563,471   
   

 

 

  

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

        December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010
   

Rate of Interest(1)

  

Maturity

 Pesos
(thousands)
  Foreign currency
(thousands)
 Pesos
(thousands)
  Foreign currency
(thousands)

Pesos:

        

Certificados bursátiles (publicly traded debt securities)

  

Cetes plus 0.57%, TIIE(1)less 0.07% to 0.9%, and

Fixed at 7.65% and 9.91%

  Various to 2021  105,447,180     83,947,180   

Direct loans

  Fixed from 10.55% to 11% and TIIE plus 0.48% to 2.4%  Various to 2016  11,966,667     28,050,000   
     

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total financing in pesos

      117,413,847     111,997,180   

Unidades de Inversión Certificados Bursátiles

  

Zero rate and

Fixed at 3.55% to 4.2%

  Various to 2021  21,438,199     17,726,749   

Other currencies:

        

Bonds

  Fixed from 3.5% to 8.25%  Various to 2022  23,766,825     21,147,577   
     

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total principal in pesos(3)

      747,978,685     632,682,374   

Plus: Accrued interest

      8,607,968     7,389,746   

Notes payable to contractors(4)

      26,185,906     24,653,294   
     

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total principal and interest

      782,772,559     664,725,414   

Less: Short-term maturities

      88,750,378     70,781,637   

Current portion of notes payable to contractors(4)

      13,139,103     11,383,234   

Accrued interest

      8,607,968     7,389,746   
     

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total short-term debt

      110,497,449     89,554,617   
     

 

 

   

 

 

  

Long-term debt

      Ps.  672,275,110     Ps.  575,170,797   
     

 

 

   

 

 

  

As of December 31, 2012, long-term debt was as follows:

 

   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017 and
thereafter
   Total 

Maturity of the total principal outstanding and accrued interest as of December 31, 2011, for each of the years ending December 31,

   Ps.  110,497,449     Ps. 86,572,346     Ps. 66,961,000     Ps.  62,392,268     Ps.  80,618,428     Ps.  375,731,068     Ps.  782,772,559  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
         December 31, 2012 
   

Rate of Interest(1)

  Maturity  Pesos
(thousands)
   Foreign
currency

(thousands)
 

U.S. dollars:

        

Bonds

  Fixed from 1.7 % to 9.5%  Various to 2045  Ps. 322,847,701     24,815,159  

Purchasing loans

  LIBOR plus 0.4% to 0.5%  Various to 2014   39,156     3,010  

Project financing

  Fixed from 2.45% to 5.45% and LIBOR plus 01% to 1.71%  Various to 2022   94,659,520     7,275,849  

Direct loans

  Fixed 1.457% to 5.44% and LIBOR plus 1.0% to 1.9%  Various to 2018   16,521,754     1,269,918  

Syndicated loans

  LIBOR plus 0.475% and 1.5%  Various to 2016   43,909,088     3,375,000  

Bank loans

  Fixed from 3.5% to 5.28%  Various to 2022   2,603,408     200,107  

Financial leases

  Fixed from 0.38% to 1.99%  Various to 2022   2,320,522     178,363  
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total financing in U.S. dollars

       482,901,149     37,117,406  

Euros:

        

Bonds

  Fixed from 5.5% to 6.375%  Various to 2025   60,910,720     3,543,687  

Secured loan

  EURIBOR plus 5.37%  Various to 2014   9,163,050     532,835  

Project financing

  Fixed at 2%  Various to 2016   1,454     85  
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total financing in Euros

       70,075,224     4,076,607  

Japanese yen:

        

Direct loans

  LIBOR yen plus 0.71%  Various to 2014   3,157,165     20,950,000  

Bonds

  Fixed at 3.5% and LIBOR yen plus 0.75%  Various to 2023   14,165,800     94,000,000  

Project financing

  

Fixed at 2.90% and Prime Rate yen plus

1% to 2%

  Various to 2017   5,416,376     35,941,450  
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total financing in yen

       22,739,341     150,891,450  

Pesos:

        

Certificados bursátiles

  Cetes plus 0.57%, TIIE(1)less 0.07% to 0.7%, and Fixed at 7.65% and 9.91%  Various to 2021   115,210,065    

Direct loans

  Fixed from 5.04% and 6.55% and TIIE plus 0.55% to 2.4%  Various to 2022   10,421,100    
      

 

 

   

Total financing in pesos

       125,631,165    

Unidades de Inversión Certificados Bursátiles

  Zero rate and Fixed at 3.02% to 4.2%  Various to 2028   25,769,565    

Other currencies:

        

Bonds

  Fixed from 2.5% to 8.25%  Various to 2022   29,201,396    
      

 

 

   

Total principal in pesos(2)

       756,317,840    

Plus: Accrued interest

       8,997,741    

Notes payable to contractors(3)

       21,543,019    
      

 

 

   

Total principal and interest

       786,858,600    

Less: Short-term maturities

       93,226,762    

Current portion of notes payable to contractors(3)

       12,016,502    

Accrued interest

       8,997,741    
      

 

 

   

Total short-term debt

       114,241,005    
      

 

 

   

Long-term debt (Note 13(c))

      Ps. 672,617,595    
      

 

 

   

 

Footnotes appear on following page.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019 and
thereafter
  Total 

Maturity of the total principal outstanding and accrued interest as of December 31, 2013, for each of the years ending December 31,

 Ps. 90,676,943   Ps. 65,124,562   Ps. 81,602,221   Ps. 66,772,810   Ps. 68,085,223   Ps. 468,978,655   Ps. 841,240,414  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   2013(i)  2012(i) 

Changes in total debt:

   

At the beginning of the period

  Ps.786,858,600   Ps.783,154,616  

Loans obtained

   241,939,473    385,419,743  

Debt payments

   (191,146,091  (341,863,963

Interest paid

   2,170,843    (850,473

Foreign exchange

   3,308,299    (40,561,801

Expenses related to debt issuance

   (1,890,710  1,560,478  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At the end of the period

  Ps.841,240,414   Ps.786,858,600  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(i)These amounts include accounts payable by Financed Public Works Contracts, which do not generate cash flows.
(1)As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, the rates were as follows: 3 month LIBOR 0.8085%of 0.2461% and 0.45594%0.306%, respectively; 6 month LIBOR of 0.348% and 0.50825%, respectively; the prime rate in Japanese yen, 1.475%, for the two years; TIIE rate of 3.795% and 1.475%, respectively; TIIE (Mexican Equilibrium Interbank Interest Rate) of 4.79% and 4.875%4.845%, respectively, for 28 days; TIIE rate of 4.795%3.8045% and 4.96%4.87%, respectively, for 91 days;Cetes(Mexican Federal Treasury Certificates) rate of 4.31%3.18 and 4.45%3.91%, respectively, for 28 days;Cetes rate of 4.49%3.45% and 4.58%4.26%, respectively, for 91 days;Cetes rate of 4.55%3.55% and 4.71%4.4%, respectively, for 182 days.
(2)During 2008, PEMEX entered into certain capital lease arrangements for tankers. These leases expire on various dates over the next 10 years. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, assets acquired through these capital leases were as follows:

   2011   2010 

Investment in tankers

   Ps.  3,075,142     Ps.  3,075,142  

Less accumulated depreciation

   390,117     267,111  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps.  2,685,025     Ps.  2,808,031  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The liabilities relating to the assets listed above are payable in the years following December 31, 2011 as presented below:

Year

  Pesos   U.S. dollars 

2012

   Ps.      621,680    U.S.  $44,436  

2013

   621,680     44,436  

2014

   621,680     44,436  

2015

   621,680     44,436  

2016

   621,680     44,436  

2017 and later

   1,168,624     83,531  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   4,277,024     305,711  

Less: Short-term unaccrued interest

   215,308     15,389  

Less: Long-term unaccrued interest

   655,787     46,874  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital leases

   3,405,929     243,448  

Less: Current portion of leases

   406,372     29,046  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term capital leases

   Ps.  2,999,557    U.S.  $214,402  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The capital lease interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was Ps. 224,983 and Ps. 219,257, respectively.

(3)(2)Includes financing from foreign banks of Ps. 603,160,398631,954,650 and Ps. 498,585,732594,949,120, as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, respectively.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(4)(3)The total amounts of notes payable to contractors as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, current and long-term, are as follows:

 

Year

  2011   2010 
  December 31, 
  2013   2012 

Total notes payable to contractors(a)(b)

   Ps.  26,185,906     Ps.  24,653,294    Ps. 14,278,221    Ps. 21,543,019  

Less: Current portion of notes payable to contractors

   13,139,103     11,383,234     8,411,658     12,016,502  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Notes payable to contractors (long-term)

   Ps.  13,046,803     Ps.  13,270,060    Ps.5,866,563    Ps.9,526,517  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 (a)PEMEX has entered into Financed Public Works Contracts (“FPWC”) (formerly known as Multiple Services Contracts, or “MSCs”)Contracts) pursuant to which the hydrocarbons and construction in progress are property of PEMEX. Pursuant to the FPWC, the contractors manage the work in progress, classified as development, infrastructure and maintenance. As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, PEMEX had an outstanding amount payable of Ps. 22,415,33811,387,225 and Ps. 20,958,659,18,337,981, respectively.
 (b)During 2007, Pemex-Exploration and Production contracted for the purchase of a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (“FPSO”) vessel. The investment in the vessel totaled U.S. $723,575. As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, the outstanding balances owing to the contractor were Ps. 3,770,5682,890,996 (U.S. $269,511)$221,083) and Ps. 3,694,6353,205,038 (U.S. $298,989)$246,350), respectively. In accordance with the contract, the estimated future payments are as follows:

 

Year

  U.S.  $   U.S. $ 

2012

   25,267  

2013

   25,267  

2014

   25,267     25,267  

2015

   25,267     25,267  

2016

   25,267     25,267  

2017 and thereafter

   143,176  

2017

   25,267  

2018

   25,267  

2019 and thereafter

   94,748  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  U.S.  $269,511    U.S.$ 221,083  
  

 

   

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, PEMEX used the following exchange rates to translate the outstanding balances in foreign currencies to pesos in the statement of financial position:

   December 31, 
   2013   2012 

U.S. dollar

   13.0765     13.0101  

Japanese yen

   0.1245     0.15070  

Pounds sterling

   21.6560     21.1401  

Euro

   18.0194     17.1968  

Swiss francs

   14.7058     14.2451  

Canadian dollar

   12.3076     13.0689  

Australian dollar

   11.6982     13.5045  

NOTE 12—13—FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

PEMEX’s cash flows arising from its commercial and financial activities are exposed toPEMEX faces market risk caused by the volatility of interest rates, currencyhydrocarbon prices, exchange rates and hydrocarbons prices in nationalinterest rates, credit risk associated with investments and international markets.

financial derivatives, as well as liquidity risk. In order to monitor and manage these market risks, PEMEX has developedapproved general provisions relating to financial risk management, which are comprised of policies and guidelines that promote a comprehensive approach to managing such risks,an integrated framework for risk management, regulate the use of DFIs and guide the development of hedging strategies and provide strategies for the formulation of risk limit estimates.mitigation strategies.

PEMEX’s risk management regulations provideThis regulatory framework establishes that DFIs should generally be used only for the purpose of hedging.mitigating financial risk. The use of DFIs for any other purpose must be approved in accordance with currentPEMEX’s internal regulations.regulation.

PEMEX has a policyOne of reducingPEMEX’s policies is to contribute minimizing the potential impact of marketthat unfavorable changes in financial risk factors have on its financial results by promoting aan adequate balance between expected incoming cash flows from operations and outgoing cash flows relatedrelating to its liabilities.

Additionally,In addition, the PMI Group (Note 3(b)) has implemented a normativeregulatory framework for risk management with respect to its activities, which includesconsists of policies, guidelines and procedures that establish controlsto manage the market risk associated with its commodity trading activities, in accordance with industry best practices, includingsuch as: the productionuse of periodic reports regardingDFIs for financial risk mitigation purposes exclusively; the segregation of duties; valuation and monitoring mechanisms, such as the generation of a daily portfolio risk portfolio forreport, value at risk (VaR) computation and regular stress testing of major exposures; and VaR limits, both at a global and business unit level and the managementimplementation of the PMI Group. Moreover,stop loss mechanisms. In addition, the PMI Group relies on aalso has its own risk management sub-committee,subcommittee which overseessupervises the trading of DFIs.

 

(a)(i)Counterparty and credit risk associated with DFIsRisk Management

When the fair valueMarket Risk

(i)Interest Rate Risk

PEMEX is exposed to fluctuations in floating interest rate liabilities. PEMEX is exposed to U.S. dollar LIBOR and to Mexican peso TIIE. As of DFIs is favorable to PEMEX, it faces the risk that counterparties will not be able to meet their obligations. To reduce that risk, PEMEX monitors the creditworthinessDecember 31, 2013, approximately 24.8% of its counterparties and the credit risk exposurePEMEX’s total net debt outstanding consisted of its DFIs. PEMEX enters into transactions primarily with major financial institutions andfloating rate debt.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

hydrocarbon intermediaries with appropriate credit ratings, which ratings are issuedOccasionally, for strategic reasons or in order to offset the expected inflows and revised periodically by risk rating agencies. Additionally,outflows, PEMEX maintains a diversified portfolio of counterparties.

During 2009, Petróleos Mexicanoshas entered into interest rate swaps. Under its interest rate swap agreements, PEMEX acquires the obligation to make payments based on a varietyfixed interest rate and is entitled to receive floating interest rate payments based on LIBOR, TIIE or a rate referenced to or calculated from TIIE.

As of December 31, 2013, PEMEX was a party to an interest rate swap agreement denominated in U.S. dollars for a notional amount of U.S. $750,000 at a fixed interest rate of 2.38% and a term of 10.13 years.

Similarly, in order to eliminate the volatility associated with variable interest rates of long-term currency swaps, relyingfinancing operations, PMI NASA has executed interest rate swap agreements denominated in U.S. dollars for an outstanding notional amount of U.S. $127,883, at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 4.16% and a weighted average term of 8.4 years.

Moreover, PEMEX makes investments in pesos and U.S. dollars in compliance with applicable internal regulations, through portfolios that have different purposes that seek an adequate return subject to risk parameters that reduce the probability of capital losses. The objective of the investments made through these portfolios is to meet PEMEX’s obligations payable in pesos and U.S. dollars.

The investments made through PEMEX’s portfolios are exposed to domestic and international interest rate risk and credit spread risk derived from government and corporate securities, and inflation risk arising from the relationship between UDIs and pesos. However, these risks are mitigated by established limits on price adjustment clauses as risk hedges, through which Petróleos Mexicanos was able to limit its credit exposure to market risk.

(ii)Exchange Rate Risk

A significant amount of PEMEX’s revenues is derived from exports of crude oil and petroleum products, which are priced and payable in U.S. dollars. Moreover, PEMEX’s revenues from domestic sales of gasoline and diesel net of the IEPS tax, petrochemicals and natural gas and its byproducts are related to international U.S. dollar-denominated prices, except for domestic sales of LPG, which are priced in pesos and represent less than 5% of PEMEX’s revenues.

PEMEX’s expenses related to hydrocarbon duties are indexed to international U.S. dollar-denominated prices, and the cost of hydrocarbon imports that PEMEX acquires for resale in Mexico or use in its facilities is determined in U.S. dollars. By contrast, PEMEX’s capital expenditure and operating expenses are determined in pesos.

As a certain threshold. Specifically, these price adjustment clauses were usedresult of this cash flow structure, the depreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar increases PEMEX’s financial balance in peso terms. The appreciation of the peso relative to limit exposure to currencythe U.S. dollar has the opposite effect. PEMEX perceives this risk as manageable, without the need for hedging instruments, because the impact on PEMEX’s revenues of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the peso is offset in whole or in part by its impact on its obligations.

Most of PEMEX’s debt is denominated in U.S. dollars or pesos. Although PEMEX seeks to issue debt either in U.S. dollars or pesos, this is not always achievable. As a consequence of the cash flow structure described above, fluctuations in non-U.S. dollar currencies (other than pesos) may increase PEMEX’s cost of funding due to the exposure to foreign exchange risk.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Since 1991, for non-U.S. dollar or peso issuances, PEMEX has, as a risk mitigation strategy, used DFIs to swap this debt into U.S. dollars. In order to hedge inflation risk associated with debt denominated in UDIs, PEMEX swaps this debt into pesos. As a result of this strategy, PEMEX holds a debt portfolio with negligible sensitivity to currency risk other than pesos and U.S. dollars.

The currencies underlying these DFIs are the euro, Swiss franc, Japanese yen, Pound sterling and pound sterling, sevenAustralian dollar, which are each swapped against the U.S. dollar. UDIs are swapped against the peso.

During 2013, PEMEX entered into cross-currency swaps to hedge currency risk arising from debt obligations denominated in euros and inflation risk arising from debt denominated in UDIs, for an aggregate notional amount of U.S. $2,028,701. In 2012, PEMEX entered into various cross-currency swaps to hedge currency risk arising from debt obligations denominated in Swiss francs and Australian dollars for an aggregate notional amount of U.S. $484,018.

Most of PEMEX’s cross-currency swaps are plain vanilla, except for two swaps entered into in 2002 and 2004 to hedge its exposure to Japanese yen and euros, with termination dates in 2023 and 2016, respectively. These swaps are referred to as “extinguishing swaps” and were obtained in order to hedge long-term obligations. The main characteristic of extinguishing swaps is that these DFIs terminate upon the occurrence of any of the credit default events specified in the DFI contract confirmation, without any payment obligation by either party. These swaps have a notional amount of U.S. $241,352 and U.S. $1,028,500, respectively.

PEMEX recorded a total net foreign exchange loss of Ps.3,951,492 in 2013, as compared to a total net foreign exchange gain of Ps. 44,845,661 in 2012 and to a total net foreign exchange loss of Ps. 60,143,252 in 2011. PEMEX’s foreign exchange loss in 2013 was due to the depreciation of the peso, from Ps. 13.0101 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2012 to Ps. 13.0765 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2013. The depreciation of the peso caused a total net foreign exchange loss because a significant part of PEMEX’s debt (75.0% as of December 31, 2013) is denominated in foreign currency. PEMEX’s foreign exchange gain in 2012 was due to the effect of a 7.5% appreciation of the peso (from Ps. 13.9904 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2011 to Ps. 13.0101 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2012). PEMEX’s foreign exchange loss in 2011 was due to the depreciation of the peso, from Ps. 12.3571 = U.S. $1.00 on January 1, 2011 to Ps. 13.9904 = U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2011.

The PMI Group also faces market risks generated by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. In order to mitigate these risks, the board of directors of several of the companies that form the PMI Group have authorized a policy which stipulates that no more than 5% of a company’s total financial assets may be denominated in a currency other than its functional currency, unless the company owes a duty or expected payment in a currency other than its functional one. This policy further states that the exchange rate risk generated by financing contracts denominated in currencies other than the functional one is to be fully covered immediately upon the execution of the contract. Accordingly, the companies in the PMI Group will from time to time enter into DFIs in order to mitigate the risk associated with financing operations denominated in currencies other than a company’s functional currency.

PMI HBV has outstanding euro-dollar exchange rate forwards which were triggered during 2010executed in order to hedge its financing operations denominated in euros. As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding notional amount of these contracts was €266,420.

Finally, a significant amount of PMI Trading’s income and fourexpenses, including the cost of which were triggered during 2011. Thesales and related sales costs, is derived from the trade of refined products, petrochemicals and gas liquids to PEMEX subsidiaries

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

and third parties, whose prices are determined and are payable in U.S. dollars. PMI Trading’s exposure to foreign currency risk results primarily from the need to fund tax payments denominated in domestic currency and secondarily from the need to purchase products in domestic currency for sale in U.S. dollars in the international market, as well as certain related sales costs denominated in domestic currency.

PMI Trading believes it can adequately manage the risk created by the payment of taxes in domestic currency without the need to enter into hedging instruments because the exposure to this risk is marginal relative to the total flows of U.S. dollar. In addition, in the event that a potential foreign exchange risk arises in connection with a commercial transaction, PMI Trading may implement risk mitigation measures by entering into DFIs.

(iii)Hydrocarbon Price Risk

PEMEX periodically assesses its revenues and expenditures structure in order to identify the main market risk factors that PEMEX’s cash flows are exposed to in connection with international hydrocarbon prices. Based on this assessment, PEMEX monitors its exposure to the most significant risk factors and quantifies their impact on PEMEX’s financial balance.

PEMEX continuously evaluates the implementation of risk mitigation strategies, including those involving the use of theseDFIs, while taking into account operational and economic constraints. PEMEX did not hedge the price adjustment clauses resulted inrisk associated with any of its crude oil production for the early termination of these long-term currency swaps at fair market value and their reinstatement at prevailing market prices, limiting the credit risk exposure of Petróleos Mexicanos and its counterparties.period from 2007 to 2013.

In addition to supplying natural gas, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (PGPB) faces credit risk due to theoffers DFIs it offers to its domestic customers in order to assistprovide them in mitigatingwith support to mitigate the risk associated with the volatility of natural gas prices. PGPB significantly reduced its credit risk with the changes made during 2009 to PEMEX’s guidelines relating to credit risk management.

In order to qualify for these DFIs, PGPB’s customers must be party to a current natural gas supply contractPemex-Gas and sign a master hedging agreement, which is ancillary to such supply contract. Since October 2, 2009, DFIs with these customers must be secured initially by cash deposits, letters of credit or other collateral as required. In the event of nonpayment, DFIs related to the default are liquidated, rights to collateral are exercised and, if the collateral is not sufficient to cover the fair value in favor of PEMEX, natural gas supply is suspended until the payment is made. PGPB has some outstanding DFIs contracted before October 2, 2009, in which customers are not required to post collateral. The board of directors of PGPB approves the requirements for credit support for DFIs entered into by PGPB with its customers.

In 2011, the overdue accounts of natural gas customers in the industrial and distribution sectors accounted for less than 1.00% of the total sales of PGPB.

As of December 31, 2011, PGPB had open DFIs with 61 customers, of which 55 are industrial customers (90%), 5 are distributors (9%) and one belongs to both customer categories (1%). Of the total traded volume of DFIs (MMBtus) in 2011, industrial customers represented 57%, while distributors represented 42%. The customer belonging to both categories represented 1%.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, PGPB, through its wholly owned subsidiary MGI Supply, Ltd., had not provided any collateral for DFIs entered into to hedge its DFIs with customers. This was due to the following: (i) natural gas prices rose in 2010 and remained high in 2011, which diminished the negative fair value with the counterparties and allowed the contracts to remain in compliance with the relevant credit limits; and (ii) when certain DFIs matured, PGPB used domestic customers’ payments to meet its international obligations.

(ii)Interest rate risk

PEMEX constantly monitors its exposure to the risk generated by volatility in the various reference interest rates applicable to its outstanding debt, as recognized in the statement of financial position. To establish an appropriate proportion of fixed rate instruments in its portfolio, thus reducing its exposure to adverse movements in floating interest rates, PEMEX enters into interest rate swaps associated with a portion of its variable-rate debt instruments. Under these swaps, PEMEX makes payments based on a fixed interest rate and receives payments based on a floating rate. LIBOR is the underlying floating rate for U.S. dollar-denominated swaps related to PEMEX’s debt.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(iii)Foreign exchange rate risk

PEMEX’s functional currency is the Mexican peso. Most of PEMEX’s debt and income is denominated in U.S. dollars and Mexican pesos. Debt denominated in other currencies generates foreign exchange rate exposure, which can increase PEMEX’s financing costs. Therefore, PEMEX regularlyBasic Petrochemicals enters into DFIs such as cross-currency swaps and exchange rate forwards,with MGI Supply, Ltd. under the opposite position to mitigate the exposure caused by the volatility in the exchange rates of currencies other than the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso. The currencies underlying thesethose DFIs are the UDI against Mexican peso, and the euro, Japanese yen, pound sterling and Swiss franc, which are swapped against the U.S. dollar.

(iv)Hydrocarbon price risk

PEMEX’s tax structure permits itoffered to transfer most crude oil price risk to the Mexican Government. Therefore, PEMEX did not enter into long-term strategic hedging arrangements relating to the prices of the crude oil that it markets between 2007 and 2011.

However, PEMEX does periodically evaluate its exposure to international hydrocarbon prices and uses DFIs as a mechanism to mitigate identified potential sources of risk. PEMEX did not enter into hedging arrangements relating to the international prices of hydrocarbons between 2007 and 2011.

In addition to supplying natural gas, PGPB enters as counterparty into DFIs on natural gas with its domestic customers in order to help them mitigate the market risk of volatility in natural gas prices. In providing this service, PGPB enters into corresponding DFIs with its subsidiaryit bears under such offered DFIs. MGI Supply, Ltd., taking opposite positions then transfers the related price risk derived from the DFI position held with Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals to those in its DFIs with customers—thereby mitigating the market risk generatedinternational financial counterparties by those DFIs offered to customers. In turn, MGI Supply, Ltd. entersentering into these opposite position DFIs with international counterparties in order to transfersuch parties. Through the related price risk. This arrangement allows PGPBabove mechanism, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals is able to maintain its overall natural risk profile.profile with negligible exposure to market risk.

Since 2003, PGPB hasPemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ domestic sales of LPG have been requiredsubject to sell Liquefied Petroleum Gas (“LPG”) under a price systemcontrol mechanism imposed by the Mexican Government. The Mexican Government fixes the sale price of LPG throughout Mexico, with PGPB thereby being exposed to priceThis mechanism generates a risk exposure in the geographic areas where itPEMEX sells imported LPG. During 2009, PGPB2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals mitigated the market risk generated by thatthis exposure by employingexecuting a hedging strategy consisting of propane swaps. Propaneswaps, since propane is the primary component of LPG. However, from July to December 2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals mitigated the market risk of 50% of the volume of LPG sold domestically through propane swaps. During 20102013, Pemex-Gas and 2011, PGPBBasic Petrochemicals did not enter into DFI hedges on propane.any DFIs of this type.

PMI Trading periodically enters into transactions using DFIs to mitigatefaces market risk generated by the terms of the purchase and sale of refined products and liquidnatural gas liquids, as well as the volatility of oil prices. Accordingly, it frequently enters into DFIs in order to mitigate this risk, thereby reducing the volatility of its income. PMI Trading’s policies establish a maximum threshold of capital risk, which is compared daily with the value-at-risk portfolio, in order to carry out risk reducing mechanisms if necessary.financial results.

 

(v)(iv)Risks relatingRelating to the portfolioPortfolio of third-party sharesThird-Party Shares

Since 2008, PEMEX has maintainedholds a synthetic long position (holding) on 58,679,79967,969,767 shares of Repsol, with the objective of maintaining voting and economiccorporate rights over thosethese shares. This objective is accomplished by using fourthree total return swaps under which PEMEX has the right to receive the

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

pays variable amounts and receives total return on the Repsol shares with respect to an exercise price in U.S. dollars, as well as the dividends and corporate rights relating to those shares. Under these DFIs, PEMEX is entitled to any capital gains associated with the Repsol shares and agrees to cover its counterparties for any capital losses relating to those shares in reference to an exercise price, as well as to make payments at a floating interest rate.

These DFIs will mature between March and October of 2012.2014. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the market value of Repsol shares was €18.320 and €15.335 per share, respectively.

Between July and September 2011, PEMEX acquired 57,204,240 shares of Repsol through its affiliate PMI HBV. In order to protect that investment, PMI HBV entered into a structured product consisting of long put, short call and long call options maturing in 2012, 2013 and 2014. The exchange rate exposure associated with its financing of the shares was hedged with euro-dollar exchange rate forwards maturing in 2012, 2013 and 2014. The exchange rate forwards that matured in 2012 and 2013 correspond to 38,136,160 shares; hence, DFIs related to 19,068,080 shares remain outstanding. Notwithstanding their execution for hedging purposes, these DFIs were not recorded as hedges for accounting purposes.

(v)Market Risk Quantification

The quantification of market risk exposure in PEMEX’s financial instruments is presented below, in accordance with the applicable international risk management practices.

Interest rate risk quantification

The quantification of interest rate risk of investment portfolios is carried out by using the one-day horizon historical VaR, with a confidence level of 95%, over a period of one year. The VaR incorporates interest rate and spread risks. In addition, for portfolios in domestic currency, the VaR includes the inflation risk embedded in securities denominated in UDI. For portfolio management purposes, interest rate risk is mitigated by VaR limits.

As of December 31, 2013, the VaR of PEMEX’s investment portfolios were Ps. (35.6) for the Peso Treasury Portfolio, Ps. (215.5) for theFondo Laboral PemexPortfolio (“FOLAPE”), Ps. (53.1) for theFideicomiso de Cobertura Laboral y de ViviendaPortfolio (“FICOLAVI”) and U.S. $0 for the U.S. Dollar Treasury Portfolio.

In addition to the exposure to interest rate fluctuations of the DFIs in which PEMEX is obligated to pay floating rates, PEMEX’s DFIs are exposed to mark-to-market volatility as a result of changes in the interest rate curves used in their valuation.

Interest rate risk quantification was calculated for DFIs in conjunction with the interest rate risk quantification for the debt portfolio. The following table shows the sensitivity of PEMEX’s DFIs and debt portfolio to a parallel shift of one basis point (bp) over the zero coupon rate curves. For the debt portfolio, interest rate risk sensitivity was calculated taking into account both the DFI interbank market yield curves and the PEMEX curves (which were also used to estimate the debt portfolios’ fair value). These metrics were calculated solely for informational purposes and are not used for portfolio management purposes because PEMEX does not intend to prepay its debt or terminate its DFIs early. Therefore, there is no interest rate risk arising from fixed rate obligations.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Interest Rate and Currency DFIs

Interest Rate Sensitivity to + 1 bp

 
       Interbank Curves      PEMEX Curves 
   Sensitivity   Sensitivity  Sensitivity   Sensitivity 

Currency

  Debt   DFIs  Net   Debt 

AUD

   44,933     (44,933  —       43,470  

CHF

   236,092     (236,092  —       219,785  

Euro

   3,849,186     (3,849,183  3     3,400,944  

Pound sterling

   555,118     (555,118  —       482,441  

Yen

   365,219     (365,219  —       360,903  

Peso

   2,840,130     600,717    3,440,847     2,740,304  

UDI

   1,339,741     (1,339,741  —       1,275,372  

U.S. dollar

   30,250,919     4,679,272    34,930,191     21,161,349  
        Amounts in U.S. dollars  

In addition, PEMEX performed a retrospective sensitivity analysis of the impact on its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, in which it assumed either an increase or decrease of 25 basis points in the floating interest rates of its debt and corresponding hedges.

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, had market interest rates been 25 basis points higher, with all other variables remaining constant, net income for the period would have been Ps. 4,993,915, Ps. 5,319,309 and Ps. 6,040,635 lower for December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, mainly as a result of an increase in interest expense. Conversely, had market interest rates been 25 basis points lower, net income for the period would have been Ps. 4,993,915, Ps. 5,319,309 and Ps. 6,040,635 greater at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, as a result of a decrease in interest expense.

Exchange rate risk quantification

The investments of PEMEX’s portfolios do not face foreign exchange risk because the funds of such portfolios are used to meet obligations in pesos and U.S. dollars.

Currency DFIs are entered into in order to hedge exchange rate risk arising from debt flows in currencies other than pesos and U.S. dollars or inflation risk arising from debt flows in UDIs. However, due to the accounting treatment of currency DFIs, net income is exposed to mark-to-market volatility as a result of changes in the exchange rates used in their valuation.

Exchange rate risk quantification was calculated for DFIs in conjunction with the exchange rate risk quantification for the debt portfolio. The following table shows the sensitivity of PEMEX’s DFIs and debt portfolio to an increase of 1% to the exchange rates of currencies against the U.S. dollar. For the debt portfolio, exchange rate risk sensitivity was calculated taking into account both, interbank market yield curves and the PEMEX curves. In addition, the table shows the one-day horizon historical VaR of the remaining open position, with a confidence level of 95%, over a period of one year. These metrics were calculated solely for informational purposes. Nevertheless, in order to carry out management activities related to the debt portfolio, PEMEX periodically conducts quantitative analyses in order to estimate the exchange rate risk exposure generated by its debt issuances. Based on these analyses, PEMEX has elected to enter into DFIs as an exchange rate risk mitigation strategy.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Interest Rate and Currency DFIs

      Interbank Yield Curves        PEMEX Curves 
   1%  1%  1%  VaR 95%  1% 

Currency

  Debt  DFI  Net  Net  Debt 

AUD

   (1,501,518  1,501,518    —      —      (1,461,764

CHF

   (9,596,046  9,596,046    —      —      (9,293,359

Euro

   (72,456,392  72,455,953    (439  (299  (67,313,083

Pound sterling

   (8,536,371  8,536,371    —      —      (7,662,961

Yen

   (14,582,598  14,582,598    —      —      (13,851,766

Peso

   (91,513,213  (19,352,163  (110,865,376  (122,377,944  18,993,494  

UDI

   (19,903,106  19,903,106    —      —      (19,344,143
       Amounts in U.S. dollars  

As shown in the table above, DFIs mitigate 100% of the exchange rate risk derived from debt.

In addition, PEMEX performed a retrospective sensitivity analysis of the impact on its financial statements of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, in which it assumed either an increase or decrease of 10% in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and peso in order to determine the impact on net income and equity as a result of applying these new rates to the monthly balances of assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars.

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, had the peso depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 10% with other variables remaining constant, net income would have been Ps. 55,137,410, Ps. 59,026,725 and Ps. 50,298,520 lower, respectively, primarily as a result of an increase in the exchange rate losses. However, had the peso appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 10%, net income for the period would have increased by Ps. 55,137,410, Ps. 59,026,725 and Ps. 50,298,520, respectively, as a result of the decrease in exchange rate losses.

Quantification of risks related to third-party shares

Equity DFIs do not generate additional risk exposure to that arising from the shares. These shares are exposed to price risk and euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate risk. The quantification of these risks was carried out using the one-day horizon historical VaR, with a confidence level of 95%, over a period of one year, of Repsol’s share price in euros converted to U.S. dollars. In addition, the mark-to-market sensitivity to an increase of 1% in the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate is provided for informational purposes. These metrics are not considered for portfolio management purposes because the investment in shares of Repsol has a strategic,non-financial purpose.

EQUITY DFIs 
   Equity Risk  FX Risk 

Currency

  Shares   Shares Value   VaR EQ  1% 

Euro

   67,969,767     1,711,286,786     (41,745,882  17,087,994  
        Amounts in U.S. dollars  

Hydrocarbon price risk quantification

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals occasionally faces market risk due to open positions arising from the mismatch between the DFI portfolio offered to domestic customers and hedges with international counterparties. As of December 31, 2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals natural gas DFI portfolio had no market risk exposure.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Market risk exposure is measured using the 20-day Delta-Gamma VaR methodology, with a confidence level of 95%, based on 500 daily observations; VaR and Capital at Risk (CaR) are monitored and mitigated by pre-established limits.

It should be noted that sensitivity analyses were not carried out for other financial instruments, such as accounts receivable and payable (as defined in the financial reporting standards). Such accounts are cleared in the short term, and therefore market risk is considered to be nonexistent. Most of these accounts are related to hydrocarbon prices.

In accordance with the risk management regulatory framework that PMI Trading has implemented, VaR and the change in profit and loss by portfolio are calculated daily and compared to the maximum applicable limits in order to implement risk-mitigation mechanisms as necessary.

PMI Trading’s global VaR associated with commodities market risk was Ps. 248.7 as of December 31, 2013. This VaR was calculated using the historical method with a 99% confidence level, two-year history and a one-day horizon. Similarly, PMI NASA is exposed to market risk associated with inventories of feedstocks and refined products, as well as with the purchase of crude oil for processing at the Deer Park refinery in a proportion equal to its shares in the refinery. This VaR was Ps. 154.2 as of December 31, 2013. These values were calculated with a 99% confidence level and a one-day horizon.

Credit Risk

When the fair value of DFIs is favorable to PEMEX, PEMEX faces the risk that counterparties will not be able to meet their obligations. To reduce this risk, PEMEX monitors the creditworthiness of its counterparties and calculates the credit risk exposure for its DFIs. In addition, PEMEX enters into DFIs mostly with major financial institutions with a minimum credit rating of BBB-. These ratings are issued and revised periodically by risk rating agencies. Furthermore, PEMEX maintains a diversified portfolio of counterparties.

Moreover, PEMEX has entered into various long-term cross-currency swaps agreements with “recouponing” provisions (pursuant to which the payments on the swaps are adjusted when the mark-to-market exceeds the relevant threshold specified in the swap), thereby limiting the exposure with its counterparties to a specific threshold amount. The specified thresholds were reached in seven cross-currency swaps during 2012 and four cross-currency swaps during 2013. These swaps were used to hedge the exchange rate exposure to the euro and the Pound sterling. This resulted in the cash settlement of such swaps and the resetting of swap terms to return their mark-to-market value to zero.

According to IFRS 13, the fair value or mark-to-market value of a DFI must reflect the creditworthiness of the parties. Consequently, the fair value of a DFI takes into account the risk that either party may default on its obligation. In accordance with market best practices, PEMEX applies the credit value adjustment (CVA) method to calculate the fair value of its DFIs.

In addition, in order to estimate the credit exposure to each financial counterparty, the potential future exposure was calculated by projecting the risk factors used in the valuation of each DFI in order to calculate the mark-to-market for different periods, taking into account any credit risk mitigation provisions.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The current and potential exposures, aggregated by credit rating, are as follows:

Maximum Credit Exposure by term in Petróleos Mexicanos 

Rating

  Current   Less than 1 year   1-3 years   3-5 years   5-7 years   7-10 years   More than 10 years 

A+

   42     79     120     153     161     108     0  

A

   115     356     327     86     42     42     0  

A-

   168     427     608     72     73     71     64  

BBB+

   96     198     313     301     359     0     0  

BBB

   74     321     201     256     145     77     25  

BBB-

   39     366     728     1,043     1,154     307     385  

In millions of U.S. dollars

  

Moreover, PEMEX acquired, through PMI HBV, 57,204,240 sharesfaces credit risk derived from its investments. As of Repsol. To hedgeDecember 31, 2013, the notional amounts of investments in domestic currency according to issuance credit ratings are as follows:

Credit Rating of

Issuances*

Notional
Amount
(In millions of pesos)

mxAAA

600

mxA

150

mxA-1+

142

mxA-2

450

Total

1,342

*Minimum S&P, Moody’s and Fitch credit rating.

Short and long-term National Credit Rating Scale.

Does not include investments in Mexican Government bonds.

The table above does not include domestic currency Mexican Government bonds because these issuances are considered not to carry default risk in this transaction, PMI HBV also entered into stock options with respect to the Repsol shares (a long put, short call and long call), which will expire in 2012, 2013 and 2014.currency.

As of December 31, 20112013, PEMEX held an investment in a note linked to Mexico’s credit risk that was issued by a U.S. financial institution with a BBB credit rating. This note matures in June 2016 and 2010,has a face value of U.S. $108,000. PEMEX periodically monitors the shareissuer’s credit rating, as well as the credit rating of the underlying assets, in order to quantify its exposure to the note’s embedded credit risk.

Furthermore, by means of its credit guidelines for DFI operations, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals has significantly reduced its credit risk exposure related to the DFIs offered to its customers to assist them in mitigating the risk associated with the volatility of natural gas prices.

In order to qualify for these DFIs, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals’ customers must be party to a current natural gas supply contract and sign a domestic master derivative agreement. Since October 2, 2009, DFIs with these customers must be initially secured by cash deposits, letters of credit or other collateral provisions, as required. In accordance with these guidelines, in the event that a client does not meet its payment obligations, DFIs related to this client are terminated, rights to collateral are exercised and, if the collateral is insufficient to cover the fair value, natural gas supply is suspended until the payment is made. As of December 31, 2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals had a number of outstanding DFIs contracted before October 2, 2009 in which customers are not required to post collateral, the last of which matures in March 2014. The Board of Directors of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals approves the credit requirements related to entering into DFIs with Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

As of December 31, 2013, the overdue accounts of natural gas customers in the industrial and distribution sectors accounted for less than 1.00% of the total sales of Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

As of December 31, 2013, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals had open DFIs with 33 customers, of which 26 are industrial customers (79%), 6 are distributors (18%) and one customer is both an industrial customer and a distributor (3%). Of the total volume (in millions of British thermal units or MMBtu) of DFIs traded in 2013, industrial customers represented 50.4%, while distributors represented 46.4%. The customer belonging to both categories represented 3.2%.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, through its subsidiary MGI Supply, Ltd., had not provided any collateral for DFIs entered into to hedge its DFIs with customers. This was due to the following: (i) natural gas prices maintained levels below the strike price, forwhich has kept the credit limits within the set limits; and (ii) when certain DFIs matured, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals used domestic customers’ payments to meet its international obligations.

The potential future exposure of MGI Supply, Ltd.’s DFI portfolio was calculated in a manner analogous to the analysis of Petróleos Mexicanos’ DFI positions. The current and potential exposure, aggregated by credit rating, is as follows:

Maximum Credit Exposure by term in Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals 

Rating

  Current   Less than 1 year   1-3 years   3-5 years   5-7 years   7-10 years   More than 10 years 
A   1.6     1.3     0.2     0.0     0.0     0.0     0.0  
A-   0.4     0.5     0.5     0.0     0.0     0.0     0.0  
BBB+   0.0     0.1     0.0     0.0     0.0     0.0     0.0  

In millions of U.S. dollars

  

PMI Trading’s credit risk associated with DFI transactions is mitigated through the use of futures and standardized instruments that are cleared through CME-Clearport.

PMI HBV’s credit risk associated with DFI transactions is related Repsol shares was U.S. $30.51to the financing that it obtains from the same DFI counterparties. PMI HBV’s debt balance with such counterparties is greater than the DFIs’ mark-to-market value.

Liquidity Risk

Through its debt planning and U.S. $27.94,dollar selling operations, PEMEX currently preserves a cash balance at a level of liquidity in domestic currency and U.S. dollars that is considered adequate to cover its investment and operating expenses, as well as other payment obligations.

In addition, PEMEX has acquired three committed revolving credit lines in order to mitigate liquidity risk, one of which provides access to Ps. 10,000,000 with an expiration date of December 2015, and two others that each provides access to U.S. $1,250,000 with expiration dates in December 2016 and October 2017, respectively.

Finally, the investment strategies of PEMEX’s portfolios are structured by selecting horizons that consider each currency’s cash flow requirements in order to preserve liquidity.

The PMI Group mitigates the liquidity risk within its companies through several mechanisms, the most important of which is the centralized treasury or “in-house bank,” which provides access to a syndicated credit

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

line for up to U.S. $700,000, as well as to the additional cash in custody. In addition, the companies in the PMI Group have access to bilateral credit lines from financial institutions for up to U.S. $250,000.

The companies in the PMI Group monitor their cash flow on a daily basis and protect their creditworthiness in the financial markets. Liquidity risk is mitigated by monitoring the maximum/minimum permissible financial ratios as set forth in the policies approved by each company’s Board of Directors.

The following tables show the cash flow maturities as well as the fair value of PEMEX’s debt and DFI portfolios as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. It should be noted that:

For debt obligations, these tables present principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates for fixed rate debt.

For interest rate and currency swaps, these tables present notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates.

Weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates obtained from the interbank market yield curve at the reporting date.

For natural gas DFIs, volumes are presented in MMBtu, and fixed average and strike prices are presented in U.S. dollars per MMBtu.

A DFI’s fair value includes CVA and is calculated based on market quotes obtained from market sources such as Reuters and Bloomberg. Forward curves for natural gas are supplied by the Kiodex Risk Workbench platform.

For PMI Trading, prices used in commercial transactions and DFIs are published by reputable sources that are widely used in international markets, such as CME-NYMEX, Platts and Argus, among others.

Fair value is calculated internally, by discounting cash flows with the corresponding zero-coupon yield curve, in the original currency.

For all instruments, the tables are based on the contract terms in order to determine future cash flows categorized by expected maturity dates.

This information is presented in thousands of pesos (except as noted).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Quantitative Disclosure of Debt Cash Flows’ Maturities as of December 31, 2013(1)(2)

  Year of Expected Maturity Date  Total
Carrying
Value
  Fair Value 
  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019
Thereafter
   

Liabilities

        

Outstanding debt

        

Fixed rate (U.S. dollars)

  18,827,853    30,599,245    8,012,990    7,282,939    54,091,020    304,856,256    423,670,303    447,282,809  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       5.4470 

Fixed rate (Japanese yen)

  1,128,140    1,128,140    726,869    363,422    —       3,735,000    7,081,571    7,714,998  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       2.9070 

Fixed rate (Pounds)

  —       —       —       —       —       7,528,128    7,528,128    10,022,857  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       8.2500 

Fixed rate (pesos)

  —       9,500,000    7,498,990    —       —       51,230,219    68,229,209    72,738,704  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       8.1873 

Fixed rate (UDIs)

  —       —       —       —       —       26,746,411    26,746,411    25,295,383  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       3.6143 

Fixed rate (euros)

  500    46    15,316,513    21,511,809    —       41,245,103    78,073,971    88,219,672  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       4.9780 

Fixed rate (Swiss Francs)

  7,352,900    —       —       —       —       4,403,283    11,756,183    12,200,636  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       3.1255 

Fixed rate (Australian dollars)

  —       —       —       1,747,544    —       —       1,747,544    1,917,297  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —       —       —       —       —       —       6.1250 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total fixed rate debt

  27,309,393    41,227,431    31,555,362    30,905,714    54,091,020    439,744,400    624,833,320    665,392,357  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Variable rate (U.S. dollars)

  25,497,804    14,778,763    38,952,740    12,424,670    13,994,202    15,177,965    120,826,144    123,407,193  

Variable rate (Japanese yen)

  2,608,275    —       —       —       —       7,968,000    10,576,275    10,995,410  

Variable rate (euros)

  4,779,803    —       —       —       —       —       4,779,803    5,041,659  

Variable rate (pesos)

  20,666,667    9,118,368    11,094,119    23,442,426    —       6,088,290    70,409,870    71,159,977  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total variable rate debt

  53,552,549    23,897,131    50,046,859    35,867,096    13,994,202    29,234,255    206,592,092    210,604,238  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Debt

  80,861,942    65,124,562    81,602,221    66,772,810    68,085,222    468,978,655    831,425,412    875,996,595  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)The information in this table has been calculated using exchange rates at December 31, 2013 of: Ps. 13.0765 = U.S. $1.00; Ps. 0.1245 = 1.00 Japanese yen; Ps. 21.6560 = 1.00 Pound sterling; Ps. 5.058731 = 1.00 UDI; Ps. 18.0194 = 1.00 euro; Ps. 14.7058 = 1.00 Swiss Franc and Ps. 11.6982 = 1.00 Australian dollar.
(2)Figures in this table do not include accrued interest.

Source: PEMEX

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Quantitative Disclosure of Cash Flows’ Maturities from Derivative Financial Instruments

Held or Issued for Purposes Other than Trading as of December 31, 2013(1)(2)

  Year of Expected Maturity Date  Total
Notional
Amount
  Fair
Value(3)
 
  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  Thereafter   

Hedging Instruments(2)(4)

        

Interest Rate DFIs

        

Interest Rate Swaps (U.S. dollars)

        

Variable to Fixed

  903,252    1,155,684    1,163,103    1,171,060    1,179,378    5,907,161    11,479,638    36,019  

Average pay rate

  4.31  3.80  3.88  3.96  4.04  3.51  n.a.    n.a.  

Average receive rate

  1.66  1.46  2.64  4.17  5.36  6.03  n.a.    n.a.  

Interest Rate Swaps (pesos)

        

Variable to Fixed

  —       —       —       —       —       —       —       —     

Average pay rate

  n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.  

Average receive rate

  n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.    n.a.  

Currency DFIs

        

Cross Currency Swaps

        

Receive euros/Pay
U.S. dollars

  —       —       13,449,180    22,464,185    —       41,205,171    77,118,535    1,153,442  

Receive Japanese yen/Pay U.S. dollars

  3,691,887    1,076,589    674,237    337,110    —       14,355,308    20,135,132    (3,016,981

Receive Pounds sterling/Pay U.S. dollars

  —       —       —       —       —       8,322,630    8,322,630    90,303  

Receive UDI/ Pay pesos

  —       —       —       —       —       26,174,756    26,174,756    434,082  

Receive Swiss francs/Pay U.S. dollars

  6,257,431    —       —       —       —       4,296,391    10,553,822    1,132,123  

Receive Australian dollars/Pay U.S. dollars

  —       —       —       2,032,873    —       —       2,032,873    (178,770

Exchange Rate Forward

        

Receive euros/Pay U.S. dollars

  4,800,666    —       —       —       —       —       4,800,666    158,144  
        (in thousands of shares)     (nominal pesos) 

Equity DFIs

        

Equity Options on Repsol shares

  19,068    —       —       —       —       —       19,068    101,458  

Non-Hedging Instruments

        

Equity DFIs

        

Equity Swaps on Repsol shares

  67,970    —       —       —       —       —       67,970    545,379  

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
n.a. = not applicable.
(1)The information in this table has been calculated using the exchange rate at December 31, 2013 of: Ps. 13.0765 = U.S. $1.00 and Ps. 18.0194 = 1.00 euro.
(2)PEMEX’s management uses these DFIs to hedge market risk; however, these DFIs do not qualify for accounting purposes as hedges and are recorded in the financial statements as entered into for trading purposes.
(3)Positive numbers represent a favorable fair value to PEMEX. These values include CVA.
(4)PMI’s risk management policies and procedures establish that DFIs should be used only for hedging purposes; however DFIs are not recorded as hedges for accounting purposes.

Source: PEMEX

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Quantitative Disclosure of Debt Cash Flows’ Maturities as of December 31, 2012(1)

  Year of Expected Maturity Date  Total
Carrying
Value
  Fair Value 
  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  Thereafter   

Liabilities

        

Outstanding debt

        

Fixed rate (U.S. dollars)

  18,065,918    10,739,796    29,100,931    6,657,348    5,916,768    289,010,070    359,490,832    409,508,428  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      5.5065  —    

Fixed rate (Japanese yen)

  1,365,548    1,365,548    1,365,548    879,832    439,902    4,521,000    9,937,376    10,025,412  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      2.8298  —    

Fixed rate (Pounds sterling)

  8,456,040    —      —      —      —      7,341,929    15,797,969    18,975,682  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      7.8500  —    

Fixed rate (pesos)

  2,600,000    —      9,500,000    7,498,540    —      32,825,083    52,423,623    53,759,282  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      8.1325  —    

Fixed rate (UDIs)

  —      —      —      —      —      25,769,564    25,769,564    21,955,725  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      6.8183  —    

Fixed rate (euros)

  8,599,310    477    44    14,617,302    20,498,240    17,196,800    60,912,174    70,308,401  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      5.8315  —    

Fixed rate (Swiss francs)

  —      7,122,574    —      —      —      4,264,960    11,387,534    11,792,235  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      3.1255  —    

Fixed rate (Australian dollars)

  —      —      —      —      2,015,893    —      2,015,893    2,195,044  

Average Interest Rate (%)

  —      —      —      —      —      —      6.1250  —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total fixed rate debt

  39,086,816    19,228,395    39,966,523    29,653,022    28,870,803    380,929,406    537,734,965    598,520,209  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Variable rate (U.S. dollars)

  47,754,190    18,915,934    12,810,116    37,632,511    11,376,909    16,463,678    144,953,337    142,226,642  

Variable rate (Japanese yen)

  —      3,157,165    —      —      —      9,644,800    12,801,965    11,718,065  

Variable rate (euros)

  4,581,525    4,581,525    —      —      —      —      9,163,050    9,852,056  

Variable rate (pesos)

  13,820,733    20,658,367    9,115,190    11,142,846    18,470,405    —      73,207,542    71,861,151  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total variable rate debt

  66,156,448    47,312,992    21,925,306    48,775,357    29,847,314    26,108,478    240,125,894    235,657,914  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total debt

  105,243,264    66,541,386    61,891,829    78,428,379    58,718,117    407,037,884    777,860,859    834,178,124  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)The information in this table has been calculated using exchange rates at December 31, 2012 of: Ps. 13.0101 = U.S. $1.00; Ps. 0.1507 = 1.00 Japanese yen; Ps. 21.1404 = 1.00 Pound sterling; Ps. 4.874624 = 1.00 UDI; Ps. 17.1968 = 1.00 euro; Ps. 14.2451 = 1.00 Swiss franc and Ps. 13.5045 = 1.00 Australian dollar.
Source:PEMEX

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Quantitative Disclosure of Cash Flows’ Maturities from Derivative Financial Instruments

Held or Issued for Purposes Other than Trading as of December 31, 2012(1)(2)

  Year of Expected Maturity Date  Total
Notional
Amount
  Fair
Value(4)
 
  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  Thereafter   

Hedging Instruments(2)(3)

        

Interest Rate DFIs

        

Interest Rate Swaps (U.S. dollars)

        

Variable to Fixed

  86,064    90,117    94,348    98,557    103,310    430,350    902,745    (81,142

Average pay rate

  4.53  4.53  4.52  4.52  4.51  4.44  n.a.    n.a.  

Average receive rate

  1.76  1.86  2.10  2.56  3.07  3.95  n.a.    n.a.  

Interest Rate Swaps (pesos)

        

Variable to Fixed

  7,500,000    —      —      —      —      —      7,500,000    (252,778

Average pay rate

  11.485  —      —      —      —      —      n.a.    n.a.  

Average receive rate

  4.787  —      —      —      —      —      n.a.    n.a.  

Currency DFIs

        

Cross Currency Swaps

        

Receive euros/Pay U.S. dollars

  8,443,555    —      —      13,380,888    22,350,116    16,226,808    60,401,367    52,516  

Receive Japanese yen/Pay U.S. dollars

  1,071,123    3,673,141    1,071,123    670,813    335,398    14,282,414    21,104,012    662,872  

Receive Pounds sterling/Pay U.S. dollars

  8,880,564    —      —      —      —      8,460,559    17,341,123    98,085  

Receive UDI/Pay pesos

  —      —      —      —      —      21,935,663    21,935,663    1,367,252  

Receive Swiss francs/Pay U.S. dollars

  —      6,225,657    —      —      —      4,274,575    10,500,232    803,148  

Receive Australian dollars/Pay U.S. dollars

  —      —      —      —      2,022,550    —      2,022,550    132,749  

Exchange Rate Forward

        

Receive euros/Pay U.S. dollars

  7,181,512    4,581,512    —      —      —      —      11,763,024    (41,795
        (in thousands of shares)     (nominal pesos) 

Equity DFIs

��       

Equity Options on Repsol shares

  19,070    19,070    —      —      —      —      38,140    1,433,769  

Non-Hedging Instruments

        

Equity DFIs

        

Equity Swaps on Repsol shares

  58,680    —      —      —      —      —      58,680    (2,030,668

Notes:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
n.a.= not applicable.
(1)The information in this table has been calculated using the exchange rate at December 31, 2012 of: Ps. 13.0101 = U.S. $1.00 and Ps. 17.1968 = 1.00 euro.
(2)PEMEX’s management uses these DFIs to hedge market risk; however, these DFIs do not qualify for accounting purposes as hedges and are recorded in the financial statements as entered into for trading purposes.
(3)PMI’s risk management policies and procedures establish that DFIs should be used only for hedging purposes; however DFIs are not recorded as hedges for accounting purposes.
(4)Positive numbers represent a favorable fair value to PEMEX. These values include CVA.

Source: PEMEX

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(vi)(b)Fair valueValue of DFIsDerivative Financial Instruments

PEMEX monitors the fair value of its DFI portfolio on a periodic basis. FairThe fair value represents the price at which one party would assume the rights and obligations of the other, and is calculated for DFIs through models commonly used commonly in the international financial markets, based on inputs obtained from major market information systems and price providers.

PEMEX’s DFI portfolio is composed primarily of swaps, whosethe prices can beof which are estimated by discounting flows using the appropriate factors, and contains no exotic instruments that require numerical methods for their valuation.

The options contained in PEMEX’sPMI HBV’s DFI portfolio are European-style, consisting of plain or digitalvanilla calls or puts, andand/or are valued internally based on the traditional Black-Scholes model or certain specialized variations thereof.

The inputs used in valuing PEMEX’s DFI portfolio come from widely recognized price providersIn accordance with established policies, PEMEX has analyzed the different contracts it has entered into and do not require special adjustments or conversions.

(vii)Embedded derivatives due to a non-functional currency component

Ashas determined that according to the terms thereof, none meet the criteria necessary to be classified as embedded derivatives. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, in accordance with Bulletin C-10, “Financial Instruments and Hedging Operations” (“Bulletin C-10”), PEMEX recognized the potential existence of embedded derivatives included in the terms of its contracts, including contracts structured as financial instruments (debt instruments or capital instruments) recognized in the statement of financial position and agreements relating to, among other things, services in connection with works projects, acquisitions, leases and insurance commitments, which aredid not recognized in the statement of financial position as of the date of these consolidated financial statements. These contracts were entered into by PEMEX in foreign currencies different from the functional currency of PEMEX and/or its counterparties and in accordance with their terms, the relatedrecognize any foreign currency components do not meet the criteria to generate an embedded derivative according to Bulletin C-10.derivatives.

Accounting treatment

(viii)Accounting treatment

PEMEX enters into derivatives transactions with the sole purpose of hedging financial risks related to its operations, firm commitments, planned transactions and assets and liabilities recorded on its statement of financial position. Nonetheless, some of these transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment because they do not meet the strict requirements of Bulletin C-10IAS 39, “Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement” (“IAS 39”) for designation as hedges. They are therefore recorded in the financial statements as non-hedge instruments or as instruments entered into for trading purposes, despite the fact that their cash flows are offset by the cash flows of the positions to which they relate. As a result, the changes in their fair value are recognized in the CFR component of net loss for the year.financing cost.

As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, the net fair value of PEMEX’s DFIs was Ps. 6,123,733457,158 and Ps. 8,860,754,2,173,692, respectively. The net fair value of PEMEX’s DFIs asAs of December 31, 2010 included the

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Ps. (232,378) net fair value of DFIs designated as cash flow hedges2013, and recognized in equity under other comprehensive loss.As of December 31, 2011,2012, PEMEX did not have any DFIs designated as cash flow hedges.

The following table shows the fair values and volumesnotional amounts of PEMEX’s exchange-traded and over-the-counter (“OTC”) DFIs that were designated as cash flow hedges outstandingnon-hedges for accounting purposes and entered into for trading purposes as of December 31, 20102013 and for which the2012. It should be noted that:

A DFI’s fair value was recognized in other comprehensive loss in equity.

includes the CVA and is calculated based on market quotes obtained from market sources such as Reuters and Bloomberg. Forward curves for natural gas are supplied by the Kiodex Risk Workbench platform.

 

      2011   2010 

DFI

  

Market

  Volume
(MMb)
   Fair Value   Volume
(MMb)
        Fair Value      

Petroleum Products Futures

  Exchange Traded        Ps.      —     4.93    Ps.  (102,493

Petroleum Products Swaps

  Exchange Traded             0.32     (4,096

Petroleum Products Swaps

  OTC             0.55     (9,522
      

 

 

     

 

 

 
       Ps.      —      Ps.  (116,111)  
      

 

 

     

 

 

 

DFIs designated as

Fair value is calculated internally, by discounting cash flow hedges that haveflows with the same critical characteristics as the item being hedged are considered highly effective. As a result, in 2010, changescorresponding zero-coupon yield curve, in the fair value (netoriginal currency.

The information is presented in thousands of interest) of these instruments did not have an immediate impact on earnings and instead were recognizedpesos (except as part of equity through other comprehensive loss items. These changes in fair value are reclassified into earnings corresponding to the hedged item at the time when the hedged item’s cash flows affect earnings.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, a net loss of Ps. 22,987 and Ps. 62,375, respectively, was reclassified from other comprehensive loss into the interest expense component of CFR. For the year ended December 31, 2011, no amount was reclassified from other comprehensive loss into the interest expense component of CFR.noted).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

    December 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 

DFI

 

Position

 Notional
Amount
  Fair
Value
  Notional
Amount
  Fair
Value
 

Equity Swaps

 PEMEX pays floating in U.S. dollar and receives total return on Repsol shares.  21,751,402    545,379    17,414,977    (2,030,668

Interest Rate Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in peso and receives the PIP 182 day rate.  —      —      7,500,000    (252,778

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives floating in 3-month U.S. dollar LIBOR + spread.  9,807,375    100,454    —      —    

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in pesos and receives notional in UDI.  16,105,371    (195,500  15,395,443    29,415  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays the 28-day TIIE + spread in pesos and receives fixed in UDI.  10,069,385    629,582    6,540,220    1,337,837  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives fixed in Japanese yen.  6,320,558    3,519    7,359,585    1,355,238  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays floating in 3-month U.S. dollar LIBOR + spread and receives floating in 3-month yen LIBOR + spread.  2,615,300    (14,337  2,602,020    559,122  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays floating in 6-month U.S. dollar LIBOR + spread and receives floating in 6-month yen LIBOR + spread.  11,199,274    (3,006,164  11,142,406    (1,251,488

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives fixed in euro.  77,118,535    1,153,442    60,401,367    52,516  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives fixed in Pound sterling.  —      —      8,880,564    (403,796

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays floating in 6-month U.S. dollar LIBOR + spread and receives fixed in Pound sterling.  8,322,630    90,303    8,460,559    501,881  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives fixed in CHF.  10,553,822    1,132,123    10,500,232    803,148  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives fixed in AUD.  2,032,873    (178,770  2,022,550    132,749  

Natural Gas Swaps

 PEMEX Receives fixed  (97,301  5,731    (505,595  159,110  

Natural Gas Swaps

 PEMEX Receives floating  95,493    (3,965  498,239    (153,745

Natural Gas Options

 PEMEX Long Call  415,243    23,928    374,048    13,979  

Natural Gas Options

 PEMEX Short Call  (415,380  (23,755  (374,461  (13,733

Interest Rate Swaps

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives floating in U.S. dollar LIBOR 1M.  1,672,263    (64,435  902,745    (81,142

Exchange Rate Forward

 PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. dollar and receives fixed in euro.  4,800,666    158,144    11,765,925    (41,795

Stock Options

 PEMEX Long Put, Short Call and Long Call.  
 
19,068,080
shares
  
  
  101,458    
 
38,140,000
shares
  
  
  1,433,769  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

   —      457,138    —      2,149,619  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following table shows fair value and notional amounts as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 of PEMEX’s DFIs that were treated for accounting purposes as non-hedges or as entered into for trading purposes:Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

      2011  2010 

DFI

  

Position

  Notional
Amount
  Fair Value  Notional
Amount
  Fair Value 

Equity Swaps

(including options)

  PEMEX pays floating in U.S. $ and receives total return on Repsol shares  Ps.        26,723,152   Ps.  1,520,056   Ps.  18,627,271   Ps.  1,720,744  
Interest Rate Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in pesos and receives the 28-day TIIE + spread in pesos   1,200,000    (42,527  2,400,000    (136,220
Interest Rate Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in pesos and receives the PIP 182 day(1) rate in pesos   7,500,000    (717,500  7,500,000    (1,075,533
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays the 28-day TIIE + spread in pesos and receives fixed in UDI   6,540,220    622,165    3,540,220    262,226  
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. $ and receives fixed in ¥   9,065,955    3,833,137    9,024,917    3,300,899  
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays floating in 3-month U.S. $ LIBOR + spread and receives floating in 3-month ¥ LIBOR + spread   2,798,080    1,106,550    4,942,840    1,529,826  
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays floating in 6-month U.S. $ LIBOR + spread and receives floating in 6-month ¥ LIBOR + spread   11,072,601    1,434,734    7,474,641    2,889,451  
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. $ and receives fixed in euro   64,947,004    (2,713,982  57,553,996    (369,052
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. $ and receives fixed in £   9,549,707    (984,189  8,434,833    (926,728
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays floating in 6-month U.S. $ LIBOR + spread and receives fixed in £   8,303,764    689,593    7,131,134    (8,070
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. $ and receives fixed in CHF   6,694,755    802,898    5,913,180    669,806  
Exchange Rate Forward  PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. $ and receives fixed in €   14,513,974    (279,474        
Natural Gas Swaps  PEMEX receives fixed   (3,892,635  1,239,676    (5,847,889  2,656,871  
Natural Gas Swaps  PEMEX receives floating   3,871,097    (1,218,890  5,752,408    (2,563,670
Natural Gas Options  PEMEX Long Put           91,155    38,935  
Natural Gas Options  PEMEX Short Put           (91,155  (38,943
Natural Gas Options  PEMEX Long Call   1,016,230    12,543    987,111    26,925  
Natural Gas Options  PEMEX Short Call   (1,016,670  (12,543  (987,102  (26,915
Natural Gas Digital Options  PEMEX Long Put           99,198    13,520  
Natural Gas Digital Options  PEMEX Short Put           (99,198  (13,525
Natural Gas Digital Options  PEMEX Long Call           146,033    1  
Natural Gas Digital Options  PEMEX Short Call           (146,033  (1
Interest Rate Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in U.S. $ and receives floating in U.S. $ LIBOR 1M   521,073    (51,030        
Cross-Currency Swaps  PEMEX pays fixed in pesos and receives notional in UDI   14,651,535    76,779    13,464,756    867,691  
Stock Options  PEMEX Long Put, Short Call and Long Call   24,655,927    125,002          
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

    Ps.  208,715,769   Ps.  5,442,998   Ps.  145,912,316   Ps.  8,818,238  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Continued on following page.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

Continued from previous page.

    December 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 

DFI

  Market   Volume
(MMb)
  Fair Value  Volume
(MMb)
  Fair Value 

Petroleum Products Swaps

   Exchange Traded     (3.95  (58,229)(1)   (1.8  24,073  
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

      (58,229   24,073  
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

      398,910     2,173,692  
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

      2011  2010 

DFI

  

Market

  Volume
(MMb)
  Fair Value  Volume
(MMb)
  Fair Value 

Petroleum Products Futures

  Exchange Traded   (3.6  (112,900        

Petroleum Products Swaps

  Exchange Traded   (3.3  (71,470        

Petroleum Products Swaps

  OTC   (0.6  (23,470        
     

 

 

   

 

 

 
Subtotal      (207,840     
     

 

 

   

 

 

 
Total DFIs entered into for trading purposes(2)     Ps.  5,235,158    Ps.  8,818,238  
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)The PIP 182-day rate is an interest swap rate published by theProveedor Integral de Precios, based on 28-day TIIE rates.
(2)This table presents the netfair value of derivative financial instruments designated for accounting purposes as non-hedges or as entered into for trading purposesthe Petroleum Products Swaps as of December 31, 20112013, was recognized in the “Cash and 2010. The sumcash equivalents” line item in the statement of the fair value amounts in this table and the table above includes open DFIs as of the reporting date but does not include the fair value of DFIs that matured priorfinancial position because PEMEX considered these financial assets to the reporting date but have not been collected or paid. As a result, the amounts in this table differ by Ps. 888,575 in 2011 from the information included in PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements and these notes to such statements.be fully liquid.

The exchange ratesrate for U.S. dollars as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010 were2012 was Ps. 13.990413.0765 and Ps. 12.357113.0101 per U.S. dollar, respectively. The exchange rate for euros as of December 31, 20112013 and 2012 was Ps. 18.159518.0194 and Ps. 17.1968 per euro.euro, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, PEMEX recognized a net gain (loss) income of Ps. (1,371,235), Ps. (1,236,755)1,310,973, (Ps. 6,257,648) and Ps. 9,963,741,(Ps. 1,419,183), respectively, in CFRfinancing cost with respect to DFIs treated as non-hedges. These amounts include the effect in net loss of the changes in the fair value of DFIs treated as non-hedges of Ps. (2,378,555), Ps. (1,895,731) and Ps. 8,665,798instruments entered into for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.trading purposes.

In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2011, PEMEX recognized a loss of Ps. 277,042, recorded in CFR,financing cost, corresponding to its embedded derivatives related to the Repsol shares it purchased in 2011.

NOTE 13—EMPLOYEE BENEFITS:

a.Pensions, seniority premiums and other post-retirement benefits

PEMEX has established employee non-contributory retirement plans, under which benefits are determined based on employees’ years of service and final salary at their retirement date. Liabilities and costs of such plans, including those related to the seniority premium benefit, to which every employee is entitled upon termination of employment, are recorded in accordance with actuarial valuations performed by independent actuaries. PEMEX funds its employee benefits through Mexican trusts, the resources of which come from the seniority premium item of the Mexican Government’s budget, or any other item that substitutes or could be connected to this item, or that is associated to the same item and the interests, dividends and capital gains obtained from the investments of the trusts.

PEMEX has also established plans for other post-retirement benefit obligations whose actuarial amounts are determined by independent actuaries. Such plans include medical services and cash provided to retired personnel and their dependents for basic necessities.

b.Benefits for employment termination for causes other than restructuring

PEMEX has established defined benefit plans to cover the payments that must be made when terminating employment, for causes other than restructuring, before the employee’s retirement age. These benefits are calculated based on years of service and the employee’s compensation at the time employment ends. The obligations and costs corresponding to these plans are recorded in accordance with actuarial valuations performed by independent actuaries.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

c.Cash Flows

Plan contributions and benefits paid were as follows:

   Retirement benefits 
   2011   2010 

Contribution to the pension plan assets

  Ps.  28,868,231    Ps.  24,760,321  

Payments charged to the plan assets

   28,849,746     25,297,145  

Payments charged to the reserve for medical and hospital services for retired personnel and pension recipients in 2011 and 2010 were Ps. 4,318,723 and Ps. 4,312,712, respectively. Payments for employment termination before the employees’ retirement age were Ps. 425, Ps. 5,489 and Ps. 26,525 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The components of net periodic cost for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

   Termination benefits
2011
  Retirement benefits
2011
  Total 2011 

Net periodic cost:

    

Service cost

  Ps.       2,116,702   Ps.  14,054,737   Ps.  16,171,439  

Financial cost

   1,996,637    64,048,700    66,045,337  

Return on plan assets

       (1,249,580  (1,249,580

Prior services cost:

    

Amortization of transition liability

   137,405    27,456,801    27,594,206  

Amortization of prior services costs and plan amendments

   42,349    4,974,676    5,017,025  

Actuarial (gain) loss

   (13,308,465  1,300,445    (12,008,020

Compensation increase

       1,260,797    1,260,797  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic cost

  Ps.  (9,015,372 Ps.  111,846,576   Ps.  102,831,204  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Termination benefits
2010
  Retirement benefits
2010
  Total 2010 

Net periodic cost:

    

Service cost

  Ps.       1,981,137   Ps.  13,935,679   Ps.  15,916,816  

Financial cost

   2,008,977    70,024,058    72,033,035  

Return on plan assets

       (1,218,398  (1,218,398

Prior services cost:

    

Amortization of transition liability

   138,090    27,433,654    27,571,744  

Amortization of prior services costs and plan amendments

   42,349    4,975,016    5,017,365  

Actuarial (gain) loss

   (12,531,089  6,224,769    (6,306,320

Compensation increase

       1,260,799    1,260,799  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic cost

  Ps.    (8,360,536 Ps.  122,635,577   Ps.  114,275,041  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   Termination benefits
2009
   Retirement benefits
2009
  Total 2009 

Net periodic cost:

     

Service cost

  Ps.        1,271,683    Ps.  11,649,536   Ps.12,921,219  

Financial cost

   1,675,982     51,404,121    53,080,103  

Return on plan assets

        (566,935  (566,935

Prior services cost:

     

Amortization of transition liability

   134,220     27,337,019    27,471,239  

Amortization of prior services costs and plan amendments

   46,365     5,074,381    5,120,746  

Actuarial loss (gain)

   9,086,387     (2,721,667  6,364,720  

Compensation increase

        1,260,799    1,260,799  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic cost

  Ps.  12,214,637    Ps.  93,437,254   Ps.  105,651,891  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The actuarial present value of benefit obligations as of December 31 of each year is as follows:

   Termination benefits
2011
  Retirement benefits
2011
  Total 2011 

Vested benefit obligation value:

    

Vested benefit obligation acquired

  Ps.      14,402,423   Ps.458,877,245   Ps.473,279,668  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated defined benefit obligations (“OBD”)

   14,402,423    835,890,439    850,292,862  

Plan assets at fair value

       (4,977,231  (4,977,231
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OBD in excess of plan assets

   14,402,423    830,913,208    845,315,631  

Unamortized benefits:

    

Transition liability

   (136,628  (27,893,078  (28,029,706

Plan amendments

   (42,347  (44,228,077  (44,270,424

Actuarial (gains) losses and variances in assumptions

       (40,737,704  (40,737,704

Compensation increase

       (1,260,798  (1,260,798
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liability recognized in the statement of financial position

  Ps.       14,223,448   Ps.  716,793,551   Ps.  731,016,999  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   Termination benefits
2010
  Retirement benefits
2010
  Total 2010 

Vested benefit obligation value:

    

Vested benefit obligation acquired

  Ps.     23,612,556   Ps.  528,960,315   Ps.  552,572,871  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated defined benefit obligations (“OBD”)

   23,612,556    764,939,434    788,551,990  

Plan assets at fair value

       (4,258,340  (4,258,340
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OBD in excess of plan assets

   23,612,556    760,681,094    784,293,650  

Unamortized benefits:

    

Transition liability

   (274,818  (55,068,933  (55,343,751

Plan amendments

   (90,636  (49,206,499  (49,297,135

Actuarial (gains) losses and variances in assumptions

       (15,766,101  (15,766,101

Compensation increase

       (2,521,598  (2,521,598
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liability recognized in the statement of financial position

  Ps.23,247,102   Ps.638,117,963   Ps.661,365,065  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The total liability recognized on the statement of financial position for the accumulated defined benefit obligation for termination and retirement benefits increased by 10.5% from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011, as a result of the following factors:

An increase in obligations due to the age and length of employment of, and benefits to, beneficiaries of the retirement and termination plans;

Changes in the discount rate (from 8.96% in 2010 to 8.81% in 2011), the interest rate (from 8.75% in 2010 to 8.81% in 2011), the inflation rate of the consumer food basket (8.28% in 2010 and 7.50% in 2011) and the inflation rate applicable to medical services (from 5.93% in 2010 to 6.36% in 2011); and

The recognition in the statement of operations of the actuarial gain that was generated in the actuarial valuation of December 31, 2011, corresponding to the accrual for the eventual dismissal of employees prior to eligibility for retirement (termination) benefits under the plan.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

PEMEX provides medical services directly through its own infrastructure. The effects of an increase or decrease of one percentage point in the assumed variation rate with respect to the cost and obligations related to medical services (“Medical Inflation”) are as follows:

   Termination  Retirement  Termination  Retirement 

Effect

  2011  2011  2010  2010 

Increase of one point in Medical Inflation:

     

a)      Labor cost of current services

   268,624    5,699,458    358,988    2,463,292  

b)      Financial cost

   312,273    17,788,708    371,457    14,063,586  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

c)      Total

   580,897    23,488,166    730,445    16,526,878  

Variation

   34.04  25.43  12.26  19.68

d)      Defined benefit obligations (“OBD”)

   3,547,618    203,432,215    4,324,601    164,017,124  

Variation

   32.88  22.76  11.96  21.44

Decrease of one point in Medical Inflation:

     

a)      Labor cost of current services

   149,047    3,225,591    246,604    1,455,987  

b)      Financial cost

   179,549    11,922,656    228,501    9,919,215  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

c)      Total

   328,596    15,148,247    475,105    11,375,202  

Variation

   (24.18%)   (19.11%)   (26.99%)   (13.50%) 

d)      Defined benefit obligations (“OBD”)

   2,041,114    136,847,816    2,729,100    117,762,688  

Variation

   (23.55%)   (17.42%)   (29.34%)   (15.40%) 

Significant assumptions used in determining the net periodic cost of plans are as follows, and are expressed in nominal rates:

   Termination
benefits
2011
  Retirement
benefits
2011
  Termination and
retirement benefits
2010
 

Discount rate

   8.81  8.81  8.96

Rate of compensation increase(*)

   5.10  5.10  5.10

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   8.81  8.81  8.75

Employees’ average remaining labor life over which pending amortization items are amortized

   N/A    10 years    12 years  

(*)Includes salary increases due to promotions.

PEMEX’s plan assets are held in two trusts, theFondo Laboral Pemex (“FOLAPE”) and theFideicomiso de Cobertura Laboral y de Vivienda (“FICOLAVI”), which are managed by BBVA Bancomer, S.A. and a technical committee for each trust that is comprised of personnel from Petróleos Mexicanos and the trusts.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The weighted-average asset allocations of retirement benefits for seniority premiums, pensions and other benefits are as follows:

   Retirement benefits 
   2011   2010 

Type of investment:

    

Governmental securities(1)

   76.0%         77.1%      

Fixed rate securities

   24.0%         22.9%      
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

       100.0%             100.0%      
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Includes repurchase agreements where the FOLAPE lends cash and receives government securities.

NOTE 14COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:

Comprehensive loss, presented in the consolidated statement of changes in equity, presents the overall result of PEMEX’s activity during the year and includes the following items that—in accordance with the applicable FRS and with the exception of net loss for the year—are recognized directly in equity:

   2011  2010  2009 

Previously reported net loss for the year

  Ps.(91,483,321 Ps.(47,462,608 Ps.(94,662,018

Investment securities

   3,872,160          

Derivative financial instruments

   232,378    (390,909  2,532,882  

Currency translation effect

   4,761,765    (1,532,399  (2,183,412
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss for the yar

   (82,617,018  (49,385,916  (94,312,548

Retroactive effect of adoption of FRS C-4 (Note 3(ab)(i))

       935,371    292,172  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted comprehensive loss for the year

  Ps.    (82,617,018 Ps.    (48,450,545 Ps.    (94,020,376
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 15—EQUITY:

Certificates of Contribution “A”—permanent equity

On December 31, 1990, certain debt owed by Petróleos Mexicanos to the Mexican Government was capitalized as equity. This capitalization amounted to Ps. 22,334,195 in nominal terms (U.S. $7,577,000) and was authorized by the Board.

In December 1997, the Board and the Mexican Government agreed to a reduction in equity in respect of the Certificates of Contribution “A” in exchange for a payment in cash to the Mexican Government of Ps. 12,118,050 (U.S. $1,500,000). As of December 31, 2011, the value of the Certificates of Contribution “A” was Ps. 10,222,463 (historical value of Ps. 10,216,145 plus an adjustment of Ps. 6,318).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The capitalization agreement between PEMEX and the Mexican Government states that the Certificates of Contribution “A” constitute permanent capital. As a result, the Certificates of Contribution “A” are as follows:

Amount

Certificates of Contribution “A”

Ps.    10,222,463

Inflation restatement increase through December 31, 2007

86,735,530

Certificates of Contribution “A” in pesos of December 31, 2007 purchasing power

Ps.96,957,993

Mexican Government’s contributions

During 2009, due to certain changes in the fiscal regime of Petróleos Mexicanos, the SHCP requested the return of Ps. 40,104 as reimbursement of funds that had been received by Petróleos Mexicanos in 2008 under article 19, fraction IV, clause c) of the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability. Additionally, PEMEX received under the terms of the same provision a payment in the amount of Ps. 12,600 during the 2008 fiscal year, which is applied toward implementation of programs and investments in infrastructure projects. In addition, PEMEX capitalized an amount of Ps. 494,714, corresponding to interest earned at the end of 2009 on funds provided by the Mexican Government for use in infrastructure works, resulting in an overall increase in equity of Ps. 467,210 for the year.

During 2010, PEMEX capitalized an amount of Ps. 122, corresponding to interest earned at the end of 2010 on funds provided by the Mexican Government for use in infrastructure works in accordance with the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability, article 19, fraction IV, clauses b) and c). In 2011, PEMEX did not receive any funds from the Mexican Government under this provision.

Legal reserve

Under Mexican law, each of the Subsidiary Companies is required to allocate a certain percentage of its net income to a legal reserve fund until the fund reaches an amount equal to a certain percentage of each Subsidiary Company’s capital stock. During 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Subsidiary Companies made no contributions to such legal reserve funds.

Donation surplus

During 2009, PEMEX recognized Ps. 119,884 as fixed asset additions for land and buildings regularization. In connection with the project for the construction of a new refinery in Tula, Hidalgo, in 2010, PEMEX received land valued at Ps. 980,187 as a donation from the State of Hidalgo, as stated in a conveyance issued by Public Notary No. 5 of the municipality Tepeji del Río de Ocampo, Hidalgo. In addition, PEMEX recognized Ps. 1,462,210 of fixed asset additions for land and buildings regularization in 2010, mainly due to updating the values of 64 properties and 97 buildings based on their assessed values, in accordance with article 27 of theLey General de Contabilidad Gubernamental (General Governmental Accounting Law). In 2011, PEMEX did not recognize any fixed assets as donation surplus.

Accumulated losses

PEMEX has recorded negative earnings in the past several years. However, under theLey de Concursos Mercantiles(Commercial Bankruptcy Law of Mexico) decentralized public entities such as Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities cannot be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. Furthermore, the financing agreements to which PEMEX is a party do not provide for financial covenants that would be breached or events of default that would be triggered as a consequence of negative equity. The Mexican Government has focused its recent

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

efforts on consolidating PEMEX’s institutional strategy, including through the adoption in November 2008 of amendments to PEMEX’s legal framework, which will permit it greater autonomy in decision making and enhanced operational viability.

NOTE 16—COMMITMENTS:

(a)PEMEX, through Pemex-Exploration and Production, is party to an evergreen contract to sell to PMI CIM crude oil intended for sale in the international market. Pursuant to this contract, PEMEX is required to sell to PMI CIM the volumes of crude oil that the latter needs to meet its commitments to its clients. The relative sale prices are fixed in accordance with those prevailing in the international market at the time of sale. PMI CIM’s hydrocarbons sales commitments to its clients are backed by PEMEX.

PMI CIM has entered into several contracts for the sale of crude oil on the international market to foreign companies. The terms and conditions of these contracts are specific to each client, and their durations may be indefinite (evergreen contracts) or they may contain a minimum obligatory period (long-term contracts).

(b)PEMEX has entered into a nitrogen supply contract for the pressure maintenance program at the Cantarell complex. During 2007, an additional contract was entered into with the purpose of supplying nitrogen to the Ku-Maloob-Zap complex and extending the original contract until 2027. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the value of the nitrogen to be supplied during the term of the contract was approximately Ps. 14,190,684 and Ps. 14,180,472, respectively. In the event of the annulment of the contract and depending on the circumstances, PEMEX has the right and obligation to acquire the vendor’s nitrogen plant under the terms of the contract.

Estimated future payments under this contract for upcoming fiscal years are as follows:

2012

  Ps.2,017,937  

2013

   1,486,863  

2014

   1,512,854  

2015

   1,535,050  

2016

   899,951  

More than 5 years

   6,738,029  
  

 

 

 

Total

  Ps.    14,190,684  
  

 

 

 

(c)During 2008, PEMEX entered into a nitrogen supply contract for pressure maintenance at the Jujo Tecominoacán complex in the Southern Region. The term of this contract runs until 2017.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the value of the nitrogen to be supplied during the term of the contract was approximately Ps. 1,179,745 and Ps. 1,465,993, respectively.

In the event of early termination of this contract, PEMEX would only be required to pay for services received and for certain unrecoverable expenses of the counterparty under the terms of the contract.

Estimated future payments under this contract for upcoming fiscal years are as follows:

2012

  Ps.571,780  

2013

   122,218  

2014

   122,218  

2015

   122,218  

2016

   122,355  

2017 to 2018

   118,956  
  

 

 

 

Total

  Ps.    1,179,745  
  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(d)As of December 31, 2011, PEMEX had entered into FPWCs by means of which the contractor manages and is responsible for financing performance of the work to be undertaken. Until PEMEX accepts the completed works, it has no payment obligations under the contracts.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the estimated value of these contracts was as follows:

Contract date

  

Block

  2011   2010 

February 9, 2004

  Olmos  U.S.  $299,072    U.S.  $301,818  

November 21, 2003

  Cuervito   78,297     118,022  

November 28, 2003

  Misión   787,156     977,678  

November 14, 2003

  Reynosa-Monterrey   1,995,904     2,050,000  

December 8, 2003

  Fronterizo   104,645     141,997  

March 23, 2005

  Pirineo   382,378     452,399  

April 3, 2007

  Nejo   324,302     696,653  

April 20, 2007

  Monclova   157,371     241,221  

May 12, 2008

  Burgos VII   418,062     765,576  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  U.S.  $4,547,187    U.S.  $5,745,364  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

(e)In 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production entered into three integrated exploration and production contracts for the development of mature fields in the Magallanes, Santuario and Carrizo blocks in the Southern Region of Mexico. Each contract has a term of up to 25 years. Payments to the contractors pursuant to the Integrated E&P Contracts will be made on a per-barrel basis, plus recovery of certain costs, provided that the payments to the contractor may not exceed PEMEX’s cash flow from the particular block subject to each contract. As of December 31, 2011, PEMEX had not made payments pursuant to the exploration and production contracts.

(f)As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, PEMEX had entered into contracts with several contractors for the development of various infrastructure works, for an estimated total amount of Ps. 350,247,891 and Ps. 421,101,319, respectively. Until PEMEX accepts the completed works, it has no payment obligations under the contracts.

NOTE 17—CONTINGENCIES:

(a)PEMEX is subject to the provisions of theLey General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente (General Law on Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection). To comply with this law, environmental audits of PEMEX’s larger operating, storage and transportation facilities have been or are being conducted. Following the completion of such audits, PEMEX has signed various agreements with theProcuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente (Federal Attorney of Environmental Protection, or “PROFEPA”) to implement environmental remediation and improve environmental plans. Such plans contemplate remediation for environmental damages, as well as related investments for the improvement of equipment, maintenance, labor and materials.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the reserve for environmental remediation expenses totaled Ps. 5,527,919 and Ps. 5,297,933, respectively. This reserve is included in the reserve for sundry creditors and others as a long-term liability in the statement of financial position.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(b)PEMEX is involved in various civil, tax, criminal, administrative, labor and commercial lawsuits and arbitration proceedings. The results of these proceedings are uncertain as of this date. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, PEMEX had accrued a reserve of Ps. 8,421,697 and Ps. 8,430,795, respectively, for these contingent liabilities. The current status of the principal lawsuits in which PEMEX is involved is as follows:

In September 2001, Conproca, S.A. de C.V. (“CONPROCA”), the construction company performing construction and maintenance services for Pemex-Refining’s Cadereyta refinery, filed a claim for arbitration before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (the “ICA”) against Pemex-Refining and Petróleos Mexicanos (No. 11760/KGA) related to expenses incurred by CONPROCA for, among other things, additional work performed and value added. On December 17, 2008, the ICA issued a general liability award in favor of CONPROCA, without specifying an amount to be paid by Pemex-Refining or Petróleos Mexicanos. CONPROCA is seeking a total amount of U.S. $424,890 and Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Refining are seeking U.S. $116,025. On January 11, 2012, the ICA notified the parties of the final award, pursuant to which Pemex-Refining and Petróleos Mexicanos were ordered to pay U.S. $311,178 and CONPROCA was ordered to pay U.S. $29,056. After the amounts were offset, the amount to be paid to CONPROCA is U.S. $282,121 plus financial expenses and taxes. On February 10, 2012, CONPROCA filed a request to clarify the final award. As of the date of this report, a resolution in connection with this request is still pending.

In December 2003, Unión de Sistemas Industriales, S.A. de C.V. (“USISA”) filed a claim (No. 202/2003) before theJuzgado Tercero de Distrito en Materia Civil (Third Civil District Court) in the Federal District against Pemex-Refining, seeking to nullify a fixed-price work contract with a predetermined length, whose object was the modernization of the cathodic protection system in certain Pemex-Refining pipelines, and seeking approximately Ps. 393,094 in damages and expenses. On July 13, 2010, theSegundo Tribunal Unitario en Materias Civil y Administrativa del Primer Circuito(Second Unit Civil and Administrative Court of the First Circuit) in the Federal District issued a judgment in connection with anamparo filed by USISA, ordering Pemex-Refining to pay Ps. 89,000 plus the plaintiff’s financial expenses. On March 22, 2011, Pemex-Refining paid the principal portion of the judgment. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed a motion for the payment of financial expenses seeking approximately Ps. 67,281, to which Pemex-Refining responded. The evidentiary stage related to this payment was opened, and Pemex-Refining appointed its expert, who accepted his designation. As of this date, the expert’s opinion is still pending.

In December 2004, Corporación Mexicana de Mantenimiento Integral, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“COMMISA”) filed an arbitration claim (No. 13613/CCO/JRF) before the ICA against Pemex-Exploration and Production for, among other things, a breach of a construction agreement in connection with two platforms in the Cantarell project (Project No. IPC-01). On January 13, 2010, the ICA notified Pemex-Exploration and Production that it had issued an award, dated December 16, 2009, requiring Pemex-Exploration and Production to pay COMMISA sums of approximately U.S. $293,645 and Ps. 34,459, plus interest, but also requiring COMMISA to pay Pemex-Exploration and Production a sum of approximately U.S. $5,919, plus interest. On January 11, 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production was notified that COMMISA had filed a motion (No. 10-cv-00206-AKH) before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York requesting the enforcement of the ICA award in its favor. On November 2, 2010 a judgment was issued and Pemex-Exploration and Production was ordered to pay U.S. $355,864. On November 15, 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production appealed the ruling and requested that execution of the judgment be postponed until the appeal is resolved. This request was granted, on the condition that Pemex-Exploration and Production deposit U.S. $395,009 in an account of the Court. Such amount was deposited by Pemex-Exploration and Production in the Court’s account on December 30, 2010. Previously,

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Pemex-Exploration and Production had filed a motion before theJuzgado Quinto de Distrito en Materia Civil (Fifth Civil District Court) in the Federal District, requesting that the award be declared null and void, which was granted on October 24, 2011. Based on this resolution, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed a motion before the U.S. District Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals requesting that the judgment against Pemex-Exploration and Production be declared void, that the guarantee deposit be returned to Pemex-Exploration and Production and that the COMMISA request for enforcement be rejected. A hearing in connection with the appeal was held on February 2, 2012. On February 16, 2012, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the District Court’s judgment and remanded the case to the District Court for reconsideration in light of the intervening decision of the Mexican court. COMMISA has requested that the arbitration award be confirmed. A hearing will be held on May 10, 2012. As of the date of this report, a new decision by the District Court is still pending.

On August 20, 2007, Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Refining were summoned before theJuzgado Décimocuarto de Distrito del Décimo Circuito (Fourteenth District Court of the Tenth Circuit) in Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz in connection with a civil claim (No. 12/2007) filed by Leoba Rueda Nava for, among other things, civil liability and damages resulting from the contamination of land used to store oil waste caused by hydrocarbons and other toxic substances. On May 19, 2010, a final judgment was issued in favor of the plaintiff. Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Refining were ordered to pay damages of Ps. 995,877, plus interest, as well as expenses related to the claim.In May 2010, the plaintiff and the defendants each filed motions against this judgment. On June 14, 2011, thePrimer Tribunal Unitario del Décimo Circuito (First Unit Court of the Tenth Circuit) overturned the judgment issued by the Fourteenth District Court, stating that the claim should not have been brought in civil court, and ordered the plaintiff to pay expenses related to this claim. The plaintiff filed anamparo before theTribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil y del Trabajo del Décimo Circuito (Joint Civil and Labor Court of the Tenth District), which was denied on January 23, 2012. Therefore, the judgment issued by the First Unit Court of the Tenth Circuit is final and this claim has concluded.

In February 2010, theServicio de Administración Tributaria(the Tax Management Service) notified Pemex-Exploration and Production of the results of its review of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 with respect to federal taxes, value added tax and Ordinary Duty on Hydrocarbons payable by it. On September 20, 2010, the Tax Management Service determined that Pemex-Exploration and Production owed additional taxes totaling Ps. 4,575,208 (of which Pemex was notified on September 22, 2010). On November 30, 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed an administrative claim (No. 28733/10-17-03-7) before theTercera Sala Regional Metropolitana (Third Regional Metropolitan Court) of theTribunal Federal de Justicia Fiscal y Administrativa (Tax and Administrative Federal Court) challenging the assessment. On February 14, 2011, this claim was accepted before the Court. On August 24, 2011, the Tax Management Service filed its response and a motion against the expert evidence offered by Pemex-Exploration and Production. On August 30, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed an appeal against this motion. On September 6, 2011, the expert appointed by Pemex-Exploration and Production accepted his designation. As of this date, the trial is in the evidentiary stage.

In February 2010, the Tax Management Service notified Pemex-Refining of the results of its review of Pemex-Refining’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 with respect to federal contributions, value added tax and the Hydrocarbons Income Tax. On September 20, 2010, the Tax Management Service notified Pemex-Refining that it owed approximately Ps. 1,553,371 (including penalties and interest). On November 30, 2010, Pemex-Refining filed an administrative claim (No. 28733/10-17-03-7)

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

before the Third Regional Metropolitan Court of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court challenging the assessment. On February 14, 2011, this claim was accepted before the Court. On August 24, 2011, the Tax Management Service filed its response and a motion against the expert evidence offered by Pemex-Refining. On August 30, 2011, Pemex-Refining filed an appeal against this motion. On September 6, 2011, the expert appointed by Pemex-Refining accepted his designation. As of this date, the trial is in the evidentiary stage.

On April 14, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals were summoned before theJuzgado Séptimo de Distrito (Seventh District Court) in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, in connection with a civil claim filed by Irma Ayala Tijerina de Barroso, et al., seeking approximately Ps. 1,490,873 in damages for the alleged contamination of land adjacent to water treatment facilities in the Reynosa Gas Processing Complex. On May 7, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals filed a response arguing that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. In addition, Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals filed an interlocutory appeal claiming that, while they had submitted to the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts in Mexico City under a related right of access agreement, the Seventh District Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to hear this claim. This appeal was denied. Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals filed an appeal against this resolution before theTercer Tribunal Unitario del Décimo Noveno Circuito (Third Unit Court of the Nineteenth Circuit), which was denied on May 6, 2011. On May 26, 2011, the defendants filed anamparoand a provisional suspension was granted, but the territorial jurisdiction of the Seventh District Court in Reynosa, Tamaulipas was subsequently confirmed. Once the provisional suspension of the primary trial is lifted, the evidentiary stage will continue. As of this date, a final resolution is still pending.

In February 2011, EMS Energy Services de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Energy Maintenance Services Group I. LLC filed a claim against Pemex-Exploration and Production before theJuzgado Tercero de Distrito (Third District Court) in Villahermosa, Tabasco (No. 227/2010). The plaintiffs are seeking, among other things, damages totaling U.S. $193,713 related to the termination of a public works contract and non-payment by Pemex-Exploration and Production under the contract. As of the date of this report, the trial is in the evidentiary stage. On December 2, 2011, theSegundo Tribunal Unitario del Décimo Circuito (Second Unit Court of the Tenth Circuit) granted the appeal filed by the plaintiffs (No. 31/2011-VII) against a resolution dated August 29, 2011 rejecting evidence previously filed by the plaintiffs. On January 5, 2012, the Third District Court requested from theSéptima Sala Regional Metropolitana del Tribunal Federal de Justicia Fiscal y Administrativa (Seventh Metropolitan Regional Court of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court) additional documentary evidence. This request is still pending. On that same date, a documentation request filed by the plaintiffs addressed to Pemex-Exploration and Production was denied. The plaintiffs filed an appeal against this resolution, which was denied on January 11, 2012. On January 19, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a new appeal against this resolution. Subsequently, the financial, economic, accounting and engineering experts filed their opinions with the Third District Court. On February 27, 2012, the Second Unit Court of the Tenth Circuit confirmed the resolution and therefore, the appeal was denied. On March 1, 2012, the defendant requested that independent expert arbitrators be appointed. This request remains pending until the documentation requested from the Seventh Metropolitan Regional Court is delivered. The plaintiffs then filed anamparo (No. 2185/2010-II) before theJuzgado Cuarto de Distrito (Fourth District Court) in Tabasco, arguing that theLey de Obras Públicas y Servicios Relacionados con las Mismas (Law of Public Works and Related Services) is unconstitutional and the guarantee paid under the public works contract should be returned to the plaintiffs. On February 16, 2012 theamparo was denied. The plaintiffs filed a motion to review this resolution before the Joint Civil and Labor Court of the Tenth Circuit. Subsequently, the plaintiffs filed anotheramparo against the Law of Public Works and Related Services and the guarantee paid (No. 556/2011-II) before theJuzgado Quinto de Distrito en Materia

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Administrativa(Fifth Administrative District Court) in the Federal District, which was denied on October 31, 2011. The plaintiffs filed a motion to review this resolution, which was denied on February 23, 2012. Therefore, thisamparo has concluded. The plaintiffs also filed an administrative claim (No. 4957/11-17-07-1) before the Seventh Metropolitan Regional Court of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court seeking that Pemex-Exploration and Production’s termination of the public works contract be declared null and void. Pemex-Exploration and Production was summoned on April 4, 2011, and filed its response to the claim on June 13, 2011. On August 24, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production was notified that their response had been admitted, along with the opinion of an economic and financial expert. In addition, the Seventh Metropolitan Regional Court of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court requested that Pemex-Exploration and Production appoint its experts and provide related documentation, which was provided on September 9, 2011. On February 7, 2012, the experts appeared before the Court. On February 29, 2012, the experts requested an extension to file their opinions and the appropriate resolution is still pending. Subsequently, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed a motion against a ruling that accepted additional evidence filed by the plaintiffs. As of this date, the trial is in the evidentiary stage.

On July 5, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production was summoned before theJuzgado Décimosegundo de Distrito en Materia Civil (Twelfth District Civil Court) in the Federal District in connection with a civil claim (No. 469/2010) filed by Saboratto, S.A. de C.V. for, among other things, liability and damages in connection with various services agreements. Saboratto, S.A. de C.V. is seeking approximately Ps. 1,451,472 in total damages. On August 5, 2011 Pemex-Exploration and Production filed a response to this claim and a motion stating that the court lacked jurisdiction. This motion was denied on August 8, 2011. Pemex-Exploration and Production filed an appeal against this resolution, which was denied. Pemex-Exploration and Production filed anamparo against this resolution. A constitutional hearing was held on January 13, 2012, and theamparo filed by Pemex-Exploration and Production was denied. Subsequently, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed a motion to review this resolution. As of the date of this report, a resolution of this motion is still pending. In addition, on November 14, 2011, the plaintiff filed a motion to suspend the guarantees granted in the services agreements, which was denied. The plaintiff filed an appeal (No. 508/2011) before theTercer Tribunal Unitario en Materia Civil y Administrativa(Third Unit Civil and Administrative Court), which was denied. As of the date of this report, a final resolution is still pending.

On July 8, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production was summoned in connection with an administrative claim (No. 4334/11-11-02-6) filed by Compañía Petrolera La Norma, S.A., against the Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Director General of Pemex-Exploration and Production before theSegunda Sala Regional Hidalgo-México(Hidalgo-Mexico Second Regional Court) of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court in Tlalnepantla, State of Mexico. The plaintiff is seeking to have the lack of recognition of its alleged petroleum rights concessions declared null and void, and is also seeking damages of approximately Ps. 1,552,730. In November 2011, the trial was suspended based on a motion filed by Pemex-Exploration and Production and Petróleos Mexicanos arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction. On March 6, 2012, the Court ruled that it will not admit this motion until the Tax Management Service files a report about the plaintiff’s tax residence. As of this date, a final resolution is still pending.

The results of these proceedings are uncertain until their final resolutions are issued by the appropriate authorities.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

NOTE 18—SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

PEMEX’s primary business is the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas and the refining and marketing of petroleum products, conducted through four business segments: Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and Pemex-Petrochemicals. Management makes decisions related to the operations of the consolidated business along these four strategic lines. Due to PEMEX’s structure, there are significant quantities of inter-segment sales among the reporting segments, which are made at internal transfer prices established by PEMEX reflecting international market prices.

The primary sources of revenue for the segments are as described below:

Pemex-Exploration and Production earns revenues from domestic crude oil sales to Pemex-Refining, as well as from the export of crude oil, through the PMI Group, to international markets. Export sales are made through the PMI Group to approximately 25 major customers in various foreign markets. Less than half of PEMEX’s crude oil is sold domestically.

Pemex-Refining earns revenues from sales of refined petroleum products and derivatives. Most of Pemex-Refining’s sales are to third parties and occur within the domestic market. The entity sells a significant portion of its fuel oil production to theComisión Federal de Electricidad (Federal Electricity Commission, or “CFE”) and jet fuel toAeropuertos y Servicios Auxiliares(the Airports and Auxiliary Services Agency). Pemex-Refining’s most important products are different types of gasoline.

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals earns revenues primarily from domestic sources. Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals also consumes high levels of its own natural gas production. Most revenues of this entity are obtained from the sale of ethane and butane gas.

Pemex-Petrochemicals is engaged in the sale of petrochemical products to the domestic market. Pemex-Petrochemicals offers a wide range of products. The majority of Pemex-Petrochemicals’ revenues comes from methane derivatives, ethane derivatives and aromatics and derivatives.

The following tables present the condensed financial information of these segments, after elimination of unrealized intersegment gain (loss). These reporting segments are those which PEMEX’s management evaluates in its analysis of PEMEX.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Corporate and
Subsidiary
Companies
  Intersegment
Eliminations
  Total 

Year ended December 31, 2011:

        

Sales

        

Trade

  Ps.   Ps.621,678,105   Ps. 128,665,354   Ps.28,854,514   Ps.772,965,363   Ps.   Ps. 1,552,163,336  

Intersegment

   1,270,839,926    75,154,806    77,479,563    14,583,501    424,517,960    (1,862,575,756    

Services income

       3,619,441    1,082,588        47,887,101    (46,323,544  6,265,586  

Cost of sales

   264,576,555    943,739,831    200,365,430    45,562,513    1,189,796,549    (1,863,415,339  780,625,539  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income (loss)

   1,006,263,371    (243,287,479  6,862,075    (2,124,498  55,573,875    (45,483,961  777,803,383  

Total general expenses

   28,782,183    46,731,204    10,890,458    10,191,411    45,939,588    (46,156,786  96,378,058  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

   977,481,188    (290,018,683  (4,028,383  (12,315,909  9,634,287    672,825    681,425,325  

Other revenues

   23,813,989    173,375,469    330,873    361,886    (1,815,189  (522,144  195,544,884  

Comprehensive financing result

   (70,874,322  (22,848,216  3,036,493    (755,810  (57,485  (142,046  (91,641,386

Interest (paid)

   (42,188,969  (16,635,802  (5,367,648  (756,538  (85,929,986  88,247,878    (62,631,065

Interest received

   18,121,683    395,051    8,665,856    16,533    90,981,103    (88,389,924  29,790,302  

Exchange (loss) gain

   (46,807,036  (6,607,465  (261,715  (15,805  (5,108,602      (58,800,623

Profit (loss) sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   39,873        (341,562      (92,059,500  91,564,791    (796,398

Taxes and duties

   871,471,372        528,520    10,532    4,005,322        876,015,746  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   58,989,356    (139,491,430  (1,531,099  (12,720,365  (88,303,209  91,573,426    (91,483,321

Current assets

   820,462,659    385,466,859    101,064,011    89,456,812    1,029,275,435    (2,068,255,524  357,470,252  

Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   793,092    157,094    3,466,391        314,645,188    (306,148,401  12,913,364  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

   861,928,356    218,872,735    42,472,947    19,251,120    9,980,522        1,152,505,680  

Total assets

   1,685,887,427    604,779,078    149,301,746    109,586,555    2,004,713,734    (3,020,923,564  1,533,344,976  

Current liabilities

   414,738,364    467,072,805    32,253,242    24,776,254    1,375,789,847    (2,061,160,610  253,469,902  

Long-term debt

   620,556,799    33,166,720    1,711,125    255,062    659,513,489    (642,928,085  672,275,110  

Reserve for employee benefits

   252,290,666    248,626,775    60,481,355    68,344,634    101,273,569        731,016,999  

Total liabilities

   1,343,156,185    756,848,808    100,015,320    93,718,925    2,148,304,286    (2,714,779,419  1,727,264,105  

Equity

   342,731,242    (152,069,730  49,286,426    15,867,630    (143,590,552  (306,144,145  (193,919,129

Depreciation and amortization

   83,487,809    9,146,072    3,324,447    1,194,664    600,027        97,753,018  

Net cost for the period of employee benefits

   35,212,980    33,742,361    7,306,891    8,967,083    17,601,889        102,831,204  

Acquisitions of fixed assets

   160,797,360    26,919,019    3,519,963    2,563,207    819,288        194,618,837  

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   Exploration
and Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Corporate and
Subsidiary
Companies
  Intersegment
Eliminations
  Total 

Year ended December 31, 2010
(Restated Note 3(ab)(i)):

        

Sales

        

Trade

  Ps.   Ps.  533,722,826   Ps.  125,391,708   Ps.  24,738,801   Ps.  592,907,683   Ps.   Ps.  1,276,761,018  

Intersegment

   980,603,172    68,864,848    74,064,806    16,587,113    306,866,463    (1,446,986,402    

Services income

       3,469,042            46,364,151    (44,529,901  5,303,292  

Cost of sales

   236,169,274    711,894,429    187,108,924    46,414,268    896,297,562    (1,446,529,412  631,355,045  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income (loss)

   744,433,898    (105,837,713  12,347,590    (5,088,354  49,840,735    (44,986,891  650,709,265  

Total general expenses

   32,370,161    49,435,633    11,143,239    9,906,458    44,703,183    (43,305,943  104,252,731  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

   712,063,737    (155,273,346  1,204,351    (14,994,812  5,137,552    (1,680,948  546,456,534  

Other revenues

   (7,137,804  74,799,496    940,582    315,205    1,102,140    1,565,909    71,585,528  

Comprehensive financing result

   (20,888,539  (2,238,951  2,856,243    (38,918  8,231,872    108,955    (11,969,338

Interest paid

   (49,690,987  (5,088,732  (7,714,889  (155,553  (108,655,298  96,923,377    (74,382,082

Interest received

   13,907,031    1,027,142    10,284,938    175,771    113,664,951    (96,814,422  42,245,411  

Exchange (loss) gain

   14,895,417    1,822,639    286,194    (59,136  3,222,219        20,167,333  

Profit (loss) sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   143,187        422,515        (53,908,778  54,883,764    1,540,688  

Taxes and duties

   649,813,771        1,651,736    34,562    2,640,580        654,140,649  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   34,366,810    (82,712,801  3,771,955    (14,753,087  (42,077,794  54,877,680    (46,527,237

Current assets

   740,040,846    371,822,357    100,395,835    90,172,530    917,048,063    (1,903,569,092  315,910,539  

Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   753,219    157,094    1,983,237        393,300,226    (385,077,696  11,116,080  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

   789,473,758    201,826,731    42,383,097    17,793,522    9,910,793        1,061,387,901  

Total assets

   1,532,989,752    574,161,377    145,041,538    109,125,112    1,878,731,690    (2,844,852,889  1,395,196,580  

Current liabilities

   433,338,544    323,872,240    29,850,392    17,323,008    1,294,574,158    (1,891,704,714  207,253,628  

Long-term debt

   532,529,418    30,896,536    2,855,608    318,043    561,793,958    (553,222,766  575,170,797  

Reserve for employee benefits

   228,029,915    225,323,759    55,740,944    62,105,361    90,165,086        661,365,065  

Total liabilities

   1,249,247,867    587,354,957    94,353,467    80,046,330    1,955,267,780    (2,459,771,710  1,506,498,691  

Equity

   283,741,885    (13,193,580  50,688,071    29,078,782    (76,536,090  (385,081,179  (111,302,111

Depreciation and amortization

   82,244,686    8,906,150    3,531,638    1,165,828    633,479        96,481,781  

Net cost for the period of employee benefits

   38,822,191    38,974,527    7,768,779    10,617,542    18,092,002        114,275,041  

Acquisitions of fixed assets

   176,378,713    24,585,557    3,631,301    2,217,343    1,209,831        208,022,745  

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   Exploration
and Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Corporate and
Subsidiary
Companies
  Intersegment
Eliminations
  Total 

Year ended December 31, 2009
(Restated Note 3(ab)(i)):

        

Sales

        

Trade

  Ps.                  —    Ps.  466,238,779    Ps.  111,245,384    Ps.  18,885,357    Ps.  488,260,295   Ps.    Ps.  1,084,629,815  

Intersegment

   827,653,321    61,000,823    60,722,516    31,068,976    215,206,070    (1,195,651,706    

Services income

       3,376,277            43,559,432    (41,644,193  5,291,516  

Cost of sales

   220,418,954    615,983,931    164,253,248    58,813,358    696,981,474    (1,195,608,182  560,842,783  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

   607,234,367    (85,368,052  7,714,652    (8,859,025  50,044,323    (41,687,717  529,078,548  

Total general expenses

   30,868,207    44,330,942    12,441,773    11,396,339    42,425,846    (40,954,107  100,509,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

   576,366,160    (129,698,994  (4,727,121  (20,255,364  7,618,477    (733,610  428,569,548  

Other revenues

   (4,554,980  40,826,235    1,018,719    562,183    1,170,399    746,203    39,768,759  

Comprehensive financing result

   (27,778,182  (157,022  2,748,592    100,489    9,778,256        (15,307,867

Interest paid

   (48,698,896  (10,516,967  (14,304,400  (158,862  (89,050,953  84,429,983    (78,300,095

Interest received

   8,642,352    10,213,330    17,387,615    239,168    96,255,149    (84,429,983  48,307,631  

Exchange (loss) gain

   12,278,362    146,615    (334,623  20,183    2,574,060        14,684,597  

Profit (loss) sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

           524,258        (103,506,108  102,214,622    (767,228

Taxes and duties

   538,596,544    3,309,822    692,647    290,507    3,743,538        546,633,058  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   5,436,454    (92,339,603  (1,128,199  (19,883,199  (88,682,514  102,227,215    (94,369,846

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

PEMEX’s management measures the performance of the entities based on operating income and net segment income before elimination of unrealized intersegment gain (loss), as well as by analyzing the impact of the results of each segment in the consolidated financial statements. For certain of the items in the consolidated financial statements to agree with the individual financial statements of the operating segments, they must be reconciled. The tables below present the financial information of PEMEX’s operating segments, before intersegment eliminations:

Year ended December 31, 2011:

  Exploration and
Production
   Refining   Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
   Petrochemicals   Corporate and
Subsidiary
Companies
 

Sales:

          

By segment

  Ps.  1,270,854,326    Ps.703,698,643    Ps.  208,111,307    Ps.43,445,669    Ps.  1,246,062,596  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (14,400   (3,246,291   (883,802   (7,654   (692,172
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated sales

  Ps.1,270,839,926    Ps.700,452,352    Ps.207,227,505    Ps.43,438,015    Ps.1,245,370,424  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

          

By segment

   981,895,225     (257,569,039   (1,934,492   (11,566,865   10,164,740  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (14,400   (3,246,291   (883,802   (7,654   (692,172

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   1,877     (29,203,353   (1,210,089   (741,390   161,719  

Less capitalized refined products

   (4,520,495                    

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981                      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated income (loss)

  Ps.977,481,188    Ps.  (290,018,683)    Ps.(4,028,383)    Ps.  (12,315,909)    Ps.9,634,287  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss):

          

By segment

   63,410,805     (107,041,786   562,792     (11,971,321   (47,528,276

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (14,400   (3,246,291   (883,802   (7,654   (692,172

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   1,877     (29,203,353   (1,210,089   (741,390   161,719  

Less capitalized refined products

   (4,520,495                    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   (7,412                  (40,244,480

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981                      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

  Ps.58,989,356    Ps.(139,491,430  Ps.(1,531,099  Ps.(12,720,365  Ps.(88,303,209
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets:

          

By segment

   1,693,164,429     677,240,386     152,524,413     111,829,414     2,047,840,002  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

        (4,419,930   (958,022   (7,654   8,254,430  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   (12,523   (68,041,378   (2,264,645   (2,235,205   (11,136,218

Less capitalized refined products

   (4,520,495                    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   (7,412                  (40,244,480

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   (2,736,572                    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated assets

  Ps.1,685,887,427    Ps.604,779,078    Ps.149,301,746    Ps.109,586,555    Ps.2,004,713,734  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

          

By segment

   1,343,156,185     756,848,808     100,015,320     93,718,925     2,150,406,420  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

                       (2,102,134
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated liabilities

  Ps.1,343,156,185    Ps.756,848,808    Ps.100,015,320    Ps.93,718,925    Ps.2,148,304,286  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Year ended December 31, 2010 (Restated Note 3(ab)(i)):

  Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Corporate and
Subsidiary
Companies
 

Sales:

      

By segment

  Ps.   979,563,741   Ps.  605,155,570   Ps.  199,151,783   Ps.  41,305,870   Ps.  946,828,328  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   1,039,431    901,146    304,731    20,044    (690,031
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consolidated sales

  Ps.980,603,172   Ps.606,056,716   Ps.199,456,514   Ps.41,325,914   Ps.946,138,297  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

      

By segment

   711,060,304    (159,167,274  590,908    (14,888,786  3,403,103  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   1,039,431    901,146    304,731    20,044    690,031  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   (154,979  2,992,782    308,712    (126,070  1,044,418  

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981                  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating income (loss)

  Ps.712,063,737   Ps.  (155,273,346 Ps.1,204,351   Ps.(14,994,812 Ps.5,137,552  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss):

      

By segment

   33,359,800    (86,606,729  3,158,512    (14,647,061  (50,955,049

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   1,039,431    901,146    304,731    20,044    690,031  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

   (154,979  2,992,782    308,712    (126,070  1,044,418  

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   3,577                7,142,806  

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   118,981                  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

  Ps.34,366,810   Ps.(82,712,801 Ps.3,771,955   Ps.(14,753,087 Ps.(42,077,794
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Assets:

      

By segment

   1,535,841,727    614,173,040    146,170,314    110,618,926    1,869,920,721  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

       (1,173,638  (74,220      (4,785,455

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

       (38,838,025  (1,054,556  (1,493,814  6,453,618  

Less equity method for unrealized profits

   3,577                7,142,806  

Less amortization of capitalized interest

   (2,855,552                
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated assets

  Ps.  1,532,989,752   Ps.574,161,377   Ps.145,041,538   Ps.  109,125,112   Ps.  1,878,731,690  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities:

      

By segment

   1,249,247,867    587,354,957    94,353,467    80,046,330    1,956,677,742  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

                   (1,409,962
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated liabilities

  Ps.1,249,247,867   Ps.587,354,957   Ps.94,353,467   Ps.80,046,330   Ps.1,955,267,780  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Year ended December 31, 2009 (Restated Note 3(ab)(i)):

  Exploration and
Production
  Refining  Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
  Petrochemicals  Corporate and
Subsidiary
Companies
 

Sales:

      

By segment

  Ps.  828,692,752   Ps.  532,690,663   Ps.  172,346,851   Ps.  49,974,377   Ps.  747,745,727  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (1,039,431  (2,074,784  (378,951  (20,044  (719,930
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated sales

  Ps.827,653,321   Ps.530,615,879   Ps.171,967,900   Ps.49,954,333   Ps.747,025,797  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

      

By segment

   577,250,612    (85,793,404  (2,984,902  (18,867,575  8,231,066  

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (1,039,431  (2,074,784  (378,951  (20,044  (719,930

Less unrealized intersegment revenues

   154,979    309,350    56,502    2,988    107,341  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

       (42,140,156  (1,419,770  (1,370,733    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated income (loss)

  Ps. 576,366,160   Ps.  (129,698,994 Ps.(4,727,121 Ps.  (20,255,364 Ps.7,618,477  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss):

      

By segment

   6,320,906    (48,434,013  614,010    (18,495,410  (39,537,286

Less unrealized intersegment sales

   (1,039,431  (2,074,784  (378,951  (20,044  (719,930

Less unrealized intersegment revenues

   154,979    309,350    56,512    2,988    107,341  

Less unrealized gain due to production cost valuation of inventory

       (42,140,156  (1,419,770  (1,370,733    

Less equity method for unrealized profits

                   (48,532,639
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

  Ps.5,436,454   Ps.(92,339,603 Ps.(1,128,199 Ps.(19,883,199 Ps.(88,682,514
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Supplemental geographic information:

   2011   2010   2009 

Domestic sales

  Ps.779,197,974    Ps.683,853,335    Ps.596,369,519  

Export sales:

      

United States

   613,805,564     491,091,912     400,445,291  

Canada; Central and South America

   34,921,636     16,875,503     10,636,415  

Europe

   70,567,172     56,526,837     46,877,837  

Other

   53,670,990     28,413,431     30,300,753  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total export sales

  Ps.772,965,362    Ps.592,907,683    Ps.488,260,296  

Services income

   6,265,586     5,303,292     5,291,516  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total sales

  Ps.  1,558,428,922    Ps.  1,282,064,310    Ps.  1,089,921,331  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

PEMEX does not have significant long-lived assets outside of Mexico.

The following table shows income by product:

   2011   2010   2009 

Domestic Sales

      

Crude petroleum

  Ps.    Ps.    Ps.  

Refined petroleum products and derivatives (gasolines)

   676,407,259     583,747,164     513,433,566  

Gas

   65,847,550     68,731,777     59,915,812  

Petrochemical products

   36,943,165     31,374,394     23,020,141  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic sales

  Ps.  779,197,974    Ps.  683,853,335    Ps.  596,369,519  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Export Sales

      

Crude petroleum

  Ps.614,161,757    Ps.452,906,600    Ps.343,930,095  

Refined petroleum products and derivatives (gasolines)

   73,015,036     61,156,894     60,258,367  

Gas

   18,182     401,460     1,023,193  

Petrochemical products

   3,231,426     3,108,686     1,683,653  

Sales by subsidiaries to third parties

   82,538,961     75,334,043     81,364,988  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total export sales

  Ps.  772,965,362    Ps.  592,907,683    Ps.  488,260,296  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 19—FISCAL REGIME:

On December 21, 2005, the Mexican Congress approved a new fiscal regime for Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities, which was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, effective January 1, 2006. Under this fiscal regime, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s contribution scheme continues to be established by theLey Federal de Derechos (Federal Duties Law), with the fiscal regime for PEMEX (other than Pemex-Exploration and Production) determined by theLey de Ingresos de la Federación (Federal Revenue Law).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

This regime was modified on October 1, 2007, on November 13, 2008 and again on November 27, 2009. In addition, new modifications entered into effect on January 1, 2011, including the following:

i.Campos marginales, (“marginal fields”), as defined by the Federal Duties Law or authorized by the SHCP, were added to the “special regime” of taxes consisting of the Special Hydrocarbons Duty, the Additional Hydrocarbons Duty and the Extraction of Hydrocarbons Duty. The taxes applicable to marginal fields vary depending on the level of production of the field, with production above a certain threshold subject to the special regime and production below the threshold subject to the general regime, including the Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty. The special regime previously applied only to fields located in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec and the deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico.

ii.In 2011, the list of fields defined as marginal fields was published in a transition law, which provided that the SHCP would authorize any modifications to such list by November 30 of each year for the following fiscal year.

iii.The Additional Hydrocarbons Duty, the Extraction of Hydrocarbons Duty and the Special Hydrocarbons duty will apply to all production from the Paleocanal de Chicontepec (both segregated and general fields) and the deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico, and to production from marginal fields in excess of an annual “base” level of production.

The fiscal regime for PEMEX for 2011 contemplates the following duties:

(a)Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty (“DOSH”)—During 2011 and 2010, the applicable rates of this duty were 72.50% and 73.00%, respectively. The computation of this duty is based on the value of the extracted total production of crude oil and natural gas during the year, minus certain permitted deductions established in the Federal Duties Law (including certain investments, costs, expenses and duties). Deductions may not exceed U.S. $6.50 per barrel of crude oil and U.S. $2.70 per cubic foot of non-associated natural gas.

During 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production made aggregate daily, weekly and monthly advance payments in the amounts of Ps. 184,499,470, Ps. 184,499,432 and Ps. 363,571,787, respectively, totaling Ps. 732,570,689, which amount was credited to the annual payment of the DOSH. During 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production made aggregate daily, weekly and monthly advance payments in the amounts of Ps. 182,051,780, Ps. 182,051,636 and Ps. 178,669,965, respectively, totaling Ps. 542,773,381, which amount was credited to the annual payment of the DOSH.

In computing this duty, deductions derived from the residual value of investments made before the current fiscal regime took effect may be applied as a deferred deduction, referred to as a “temporary difference,” in accordance with FRS D-4. These deductions may be made in a maximum remaining period of ten years, the effect of which, if applied, can have a favorable effect in an amount up to approximately Ps. 302,763,680, depending on certain conditions established in the Federal Duties Law. To date, PEMEX has not recognized such effect from these deferred deductions because they are considered unlikely to materialize. These deductions will expire in 2017.

Production that is subject to the special regime is not subject to the DOSH.

(b)Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund—Pemex-Exploration and Production must pay this duty when, during the applicable year, the weighted average Mexican crude oil export price exceeds U.S. $22.00. The applicable rate varies between 1% and 10%, depending on the weighted average price of crude oil exports, with the maximum rate of 10% applying when the price exceeds U.S. $31.00 per barrel. Collections of this duty are deposited in the Oil Revenues Stabilization Fund.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(c)Extraordinary Duty on Crude Oil Exports—This duty is calculated by applying a rate of 13.1% to the value resulting from multiplication of (i) the difference between the annual weighted average Mexican crude oil export price and the budgeted crude oil price as provided for in the Federal Revenue Law (U.S. $65 and U.S. $59 during 2011 and 2010, respectively), times (ii) the annual export volume. The duty actually paid may be credited against the Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund. Collections of this duty are directed to the Federative Entities through the Stabilization Fund for the Income of Federative Entities.

(d)Duty for Scientific and Technological Research on Energy—During 2011 and 2010, this duty was applied at a rate of 0.50% and 0.40%, respectively, to the value of the extracted production of crude oil and natural gas for the year.

(e)Duty for Oil Monitoring—This duty was applied at a rate of 0.003% to the value of extracted production of crude oil and natural gas for the year.

(f)Sole Hydrocarbons Duty—This duty applied in 2010 to the value of the extracted crude oil and natural gas from abandoned fields or fields that are in the process of being abandoned. The rate fluctuated between 37% and 57%, depending on the weighted average Mexican crude oil export price. This duty is no longer applicable as of January 1, 2011.

(g)Extraction of Hydrocarbons Duty—This duty was modified effective January 1, 2010 and is applied at a 15% rate to the value of the crude oil and natural gas extracted from the following fields:

i.Fields in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec, both as a whole and to the fields that have been segregated under the Federal Duties Law;

ii.The deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico (during 2011, no crude oil or natural gas was produced from such fields); and

iii.The value of the production above a certain threshold from marginal fields, with the base production from these fields subject to the general regime.

In each case, certain deductions are subtracted from the owed. Collections of this duty are deposited in the Oil Revenues Stabilization Fund.

(h)Special Hydrocarbons Duty—This duty was modified effective January 1, 2010 and is applied at a rate between 30% and 36%, to the value of the crude oil and natural gas extracted from the fields in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec and deep waters, as well as to the value of the production above a certain threshold from marginal fields, minus (in each case), certain deductions, which may not exceed the cost limit established in article 257 of the Federal Duties Law.

(i)Additional Hydrocarbons Duty—This duty is determined by applying a 52% rate to the amount realized in excess of U.S. $63.91 and $60.00 (for 2011 and 2010, respectively) per barrel of crude oil. Each year, the threshold price at which the duty takes effect is adjusted to take account of inflation, as measured by the change in the U.S. Producer Price Index.

(j)IEPS Tax—In accordance with current regulations, PEMEX is subject to the IEPS Tax, which applies to the domestic sales of gasoline and diesel. The IEPS Tax is paid to the SHCP monthly, after deducting daily advance payments made in accordance with applicable rules. The effective rate of this tax depends on factors such as the type of product, reference price, the region where the product is sold, additional freight costs and applicable commissions.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Effective January 1, 2006, the Federal Revenues Law was amended, allowing PEMEX to credit the negative IEPS Tax, which is generated when the prices at which PEMEX is required to sell gasoline and diesel in the domestic market are lower than international market prices, against other taxes and payments to which PEMEX is also subject. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, increases in international prices of hydrocarbons and petroleum products caused the rate of the IEPS Tax to be negative. As a result of this credit, PEMEX recognized in 2011, 2010 and 2009 revenue of approximately Ps. 178,861,838, Ps. 73,582,280 and Ps. 37,247,260, respectively.

(k)Hydrocarbon Income Tax (“IRP”)—This tax is applicable to Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities other than Pemex-Exploration and Production, and is calculated by applying a 30% rate to the excess of total revenues minus authorized deductions, pursuant to the specific rules provided by the SHCP in accordance with the Federal Income Law.

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, PEMEX generated an IRP as follows:

   2011   2010   2009 

Current IRP

   Ps.  555,333     Ps.  2,271,848     Ps.  2,464,890  

Deferred IRP

   153,136     187,709     37,761  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total IRP

   Ps.  708,469     Ps.  2,459,557     Ps.  2,502,651  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities, other than Pemex-Exploration and Production, made aggregate daily and weekly payments of Ps. 750,805 and Ps. 750,672, respectively, as determined by the SHCP, for an overall total of Ps. 1,501,477 credited to the annual payment of the IRP. During 2010, the total daily and weekly payments determined by the SHCP were Ps. 1,198,660 and Ps. 1,225,848, respectively, for an overall total of Ps. 2,424,508 credited to the annual payment.

The 2011 IRP will be declared through a tax return filed with the Federal Treasury no later than the last business day of March 2012, and the daily and weekly advance payments made during the fiscal year will be credited against that amount.

Petróleos Mexicanos must comply for its own account, and for the account of the Subsidiary Entities, with all obligations under the Federal Income Law and other fiscal laws, except as explicitly provided for in relation to the making of daily and weekly payments. As such, Petróleos Mexicanos is solely responsible for the payment of contributions and duties owed by the Subsidiary Entities to the Mexican Government.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The principal factors generating the deferred IRP are the following:

   2011  2010 

Deferred IRP asset:

   

Advances from customers

  Ps.43,948   Ps.38,530  

Provision for contingencies and others(1)

   442,674    214,320  

Environmental reserve

   5,857    5,857  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   69,231    30,882  

Allowance for slow moving and obsolete inventory

   79,358    64,236  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred IRP asset, net

   641,068    353,825  

Valuation reserve

   (40,016    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred IRP asset, net

   601,052    353,825  

Deferred IRP liability:

   

Prepaid insurance accrual

   (11  (10,681

Properties, plant and equipment

   (5,985,570  (5,574,537
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (5,985,581  (5,585,218
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net long-term deferred IRP liability

  Ps.  (5,384,529)  Ps.  (5,231,393
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Includes deferred IRP from Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

The expense (benefit) attributable to the profit (loss) from continuing operations before IRP was different from what would result from applying the rate of 30% to profit, as a result of the items listed below:

   2011  2010  2009 

Expected IRP expense (benefit)

  Ps.  1,331,719    Ps.  3,789,806    Ps.  2,880,838  

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

    

Tax effect of inflation, net

   (1,416,820  (1,451,240  (915,759

Difference between accounting and tax depreciation

   171,248    (186,344  (1,104,432

Non-taxable loss sharing in subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   14,826    (15,558  (430,984

Non-deductible expenses

   681,254    189,219    2,066,042  

Other, net

   (73,758  133,674    6,946  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

IRP expense

  Ps.708,469    Ps. 2,459,557    Ps. 2,502,651  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(l)Value Added Tax (“VAT”)—For VAT purposes, final monthly payments are determined based on PEMEX’s cash flow, in accordance with the provisions of the Value Added Tax Law, which is applicable to payers of this tax.

(m)Income Tax—Certain of the Subsidiary Companies are subject to the Income Tax Law and to the IETU, and are therefore required to pay the greater of their IETU or Income Tax liability.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Subsidiary Companies incurred the following income tax expense (benefit):

   2011  2010   2009 

Current income tax

   Ps.  4,771,594    Ps.  1,629,875     Ps.  1,900,467  

Deferred income tax

   (1,151,063  94,931     (144,619
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps.  3,620,531    Ps.  1,724,806     Ps.  1,755,848  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The principal factors generating the deferred income tax are the following:

   2011  2010 

Deferred income tax asset:

   

Accruals

  Ps.580,041   Ps.621,843  

Advance payments from clients

   16,736    36,759  

Losses from prior years

   1,056,992    21,691  

Non-recoverable accounts

   26,390    24,721  

Derivative financial instruments

   15,065    99,012  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred income tax asset

   1,695,224    804,026  

Deferred income tax liability:

   

Properties, plant and equipment

   (1,986,315  (2,774,652

Other

   (542,213  (13,741
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred income tax liability

   (2,528,528  (2,788,393
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net long-term deferred income tax liability

  Ps.(833,304 Ps.  (1,984,367
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expense (benefit) attributable to the profit (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was different from what would result from applying the rate of 30% to profit, as a result of the items listed below:

   2011   2010  2009 

Expected income tax expense

   Ps.  3,319,998     Ps.  1,198,550    Ps.  1,837,132  

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

     

Tax effect of inflation, net

   24,352     (34,055  (80,936

Difference between accounting and tax depreciation

   4,783     216,164      

Non-deductible expenses

   153,856     344,147      

Others, net

   117,542         (348
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense

   Ps.  3,620,531     Ps.  1,724,806    Ps.  1,755,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 20—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

On January 1, 2012, theDerecho para regular la exploración y explotación de hidrocarburos (Tax to regulate the exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons, or “Hydrocarbons Exploration Tax”) became effective, providing for a tax of 0.03% on the annual value of crude petroleum and natural gas extracted during the year. The fee is assessed on an annual basis, but is to be paid in advance monthly installments within seven business days following the end of each month. The Hydrocarbons Exploration Tax for 2012 will be declared

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

through a tax return filed with the Federal Treasury no later than the last business day of March 2013, and the monthly advance payments made during the fiscal year will be credited to that amount.

On February 28, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos and Repsol entered into a ten-year strategic industrial alliance agreement pursuant to which Petróleos Mexicanos and Repsol announced their intention to collaborate on upstream and liquefied natural gas projects in the Americas, and downstream activities in the Americas, Spain and Portugal. As part of this strategic industrial alliance agreement, Petróleos Mexicanos agreed to lock-up and standstill restrictions that prohibit it from owning, directly or indirectly, more than 10% or less than 5% of Repsols shares during the term of this agreement. In calculating the indirect ownership of Repsol shares pursuant to these restrictions, Petróleos Mexicanos includes the Repsol shares on which it holds a synthetic long position as being indirectly owned by Petróleos Mexicanos (see Note 12(v)).

On April 16, 2012, the President of the Republic of Argentina submitted to the Argentine Congress a bill that provides for the expropriation of 51% of the Class D shares of Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales S.A. (“YPF”), all of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by Repsol and on April 26, 2012, the Argentine Senate approved this bill, which was then sent to the lower house of the Argentine Congress, the Chamber of Deputies, for its approval. As of December 31, 2011 and as of April 30, 2012, PEMEX has valued and recorded the 57,204,240 Repsol shares acquired by PMI HBV during 2011 as an available-for-sale investment (see Note 8). The market value of Repsol shares has decreased approximately 37.3% from U.S. $30.51 per share as of December 31, 2011 to U.S. $19.13 per share as of April 26, 2012. As of the date of this report, PEMEX’s management is in the process of evaluating the impact these developments will have on its investment in Repsol.

During the period from January 1 to April 30, 2012, PEMEX participated in the following financing activities:

From January 12, 2012 to April 30, 2012, PMI HBV obtained U.S. $5,131,000 and paid U.S. $4,231,000 under a U.S. $1,000,000 revolving line of credit.

On January 24, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $2,100,000 of its 4.875% Notes due 2022 under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On February 14, 2012, PMI NASA obtained four direct loans for a total amount of U.S. $151,945 at a 3.50% fixed rate, all of which mature in December 2021.

On March 12, 2012, PMI NASA obtained a direct loan for U.S. $37,998 at a 3.8% fixed rate, which matures on January 27, 2022.

On March 28, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for U.S. $125,000 at a 1.8635% fixed rate, which was repaid on April 12, 2012.

On March��29, 2012, PMI Trading obtained a loan for Ps. 1,300,000 at a 5.264% fixed rate, which was repaid on April 12, 2012.

On April 10, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued CHF 300,000 of 2.50% Notes due 2019. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

On April 26, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos issued AUD 150,000 of 6.125% Notes due 2017. The notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $22,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On March 13, 2012, an equity swap related to 29,658,026 shares of Repsol stock expired and was renewed with the same characteristics and conditions. This equity swap will expire on March 13, 2013 (see Note 12(v)).

On April 19, 2012, two equity swaps related to a total of 19,021,773 shares of Repsol stock expired and were renewed as one equity swap with the same characteristics and conditions. This equity swap will expire on April 19, 2013 (see Note 12(v)).

On April 27, 2012, the weighted average price of the crude oil exported by PEMEX was U.S. $110.99 per barrel; this price increased by approximately 4.75% as compared to the average price as of December 31, 2011, which was U.S. $105.96 per barrel.

On April 30, 2012, the Mexican peso-U.S. dollar exchange rate was Ps. 13.2093 per dollar, which represents a 5.58% appreciation of the value of the peso in dollar terms as compared to the exchange rate as of December 31, 2011, which was Ps. 13.9904 per U.S. dollar.

Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

In January 2009, theComisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores(National Banking and Securities Commission) adjusted its regulations in order to require Mexican issuers that disclose information through theBolsa Mexicana de Valores(Mexican Stock Exchange), including PEMEX, to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”) beginning in 2012.

In response to these requirements, PEMEX is currently in the process of finalizing its initial statement of financial position as of January 1, 2011 (the “transition date”) and its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “comparative year of adoption”) under IFRS, relying for this purpose on the IFRS effective as of those dates.

In order to determine its initial statement of financial position and comparative adoption statement of financial position based on IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” (“IFRS 1”), PEMEX will adjust the amounts previously reported in its financial statements prepared under Mexican FRS. The main effects and changes to accounting policies resulting from the adoption of IFRS are the following:

(a)    Optional Exceptions Under IFRS

Exception to use fair value as deemed cost.

IFRS 1 provides the option to measure property, plant and equipment, as well as certain intangibles, at their fair value as of the date of transition to IFRS and to use that fair value as the deemed cost of the relevant assets, or to use the updated book value previously reported under Mexican FRS, and, in the case of wells, the successful efforts method of accounting,provided that such book value is broadly comparable to (a) fair value or (b) cost or depreciated cost under IFRS, adjusted to recognize changes in inflation.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

PEMEX has chosen to value its plants, pipelines, offshore platforms and drilling equipment at fair value as of the transition date, and, in addition, to subject these fixed assets to impairment tests. For the remaining fixed assets, PEMEX has chosen to use their current values under Mexican FRS, or the successful efforts method of accounting in the case of wells, as their deemed cost. The net effect of the change in valuation of assets is recognized against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS as of the transition date.

Exception for borrowing costs.

IFRS 1 allows entities to apply the transitional guidelines included in revised IAS 23 “Borrowing Costs” (2007), which provides that the standard is effective as of January 1, 2009 or the transition date to IFRS, whichever is later, unless the entity elects retrospective application.

PEMEX chose to apply this exception and begin to capitalize prospectively all non-capitalized financing costs of assets which were not recognized at fair value.

Exception for accumulated currency translation effects

IFRS 1 permits the cancellation of the accumulated gains and losses from the translation of foreign currency amounts in the consolidation of the financial statements related to foreign operations and investments accounted for by the equity method under Mexican FRS. This exception allows entities to avoid calculating the accumulated foreign currency translation effect in accordance with IAS 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates,” as of the date on which the subsidiary or investment accounted for by the equity method was created or acquired. Instead, PEMEX has chosen to cancel the accumulated gains and losses from foreign currency translation effect against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS as of the transition date.

(b)    Mandatory exceptions under IFRS 1

Exception for accounting estimates

Assumptions used to quantify estimates prepared under IFRS as of the transition date should coincide with those previously made under the entity’s previous accounting principles, unless there is objective evidence that the previous estimates contained factual errors. PEMEX has reviewed its assumptions used to quantify estimates under Mexican FRS as of the transition date and has made no changes to assumptions previously used.

(c)    Other policy changes

Early adoption of IAS 19 (revised) “Employee Benefits” (“IAS 19”)

PEMEX chose the early adoption of IAS 19, which eliminates the use of the “corridor method” to recognize actuarial gains and losses. As a result, such items are now recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) in the period in which they are incurred. Items that may be recognized in the statement of operations are limited to past and present service costs, gains or losses arising from plan curtailments or settlements and interest income or expense. All other gains or losses in (liabilities) assets of termination or retirement benefits are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), with no further impact on the results of operations (see Note 3(t)).

As a result, PEMEX has recognized all unamortized actuarial gains or losses and plan modifications reported under Mexican FRS against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Additionally, accruals for termination benefits are only recognized under IAS 19 when an entity has incurred a legal obligation to pay such benefits to the employee. For this reason, as of the transition date, PEMEX has cancelled the component of termination benefits against the initial balance of (accumulated losses) retained earnings under IFRS.

Identification by part

IAS 16, “Property, Plant and Equipment,” (“IAS 16”) requires the identification on a separate basis of parts of an asset that have different expected patterns of future economic benefits, with depreciation calculated separately by part. As of the transition date, PEMEX identified assets by part and depreciated accordingly.

Recognition of inflationary effects

In accordance with IAS 29, “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies,” (“IAS 29”), the threshold for considering an economy hyperinflationary, and consequently, adjusting certain line items in the financial statements for inflation, is reached when the cumulative three-year inflation rate is 100% or more. Under Mexican FRS, this threshold is reached when cumulative three-year inflation is 26% or more.

(d)    Reconciliation from Mexican FRS to IFRS (Unaudited)

The figures presented by PEMEX under IFRS represent PEMEX’s best estimates and are subject to adjustment pending the result of the ongoing revision and auditing of the IFRS financial statements. Taking into account the disclosure requirements of INIF 19,Cambio Derivado de la Adopción de NIIF (Change Resulting from the Adoption of IFRS) under Mexican FRS, as well as IFRS 1, the following table presents the reconciliation of the main statement of financial position and statement of operations items from Mexican FRS to IFRS as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011:

   As of December 31, 2011 

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

  Mexican FRS  Adjustments   IFRS 

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant
and equipment—Net
(1)

   Ps. 1,152,505,680    Ps. 473,826,978     Ps. 1,626,332,658  

Reserve for employee benefits(2)

   731,016,999    112,444,603     843,461,602  

Total equity(1)(2)

   (193,919,129  340,820,140     146,901,011  

(e)    Notes to the reconciliation

(1) Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment:

Based on IFRS 1, PEMEX elected to apply the exception for fair value as deemed cost for pipelines, properties, marine platforms and drilling equipment for the initial statement of financial position under IFRS. As a result, the aggregate fair value (net of depreciation and amortization) of PEMEX’s fixed assets as of the transition date was Ps. 1,626,332,658, which represented an increase of Ps. 473,826,978 from the net carrying value under Mexican FRS. The increase was recognized against the initial balance of accumulated losses in equity in the initial statement of financial position under IFRS.

The adjustment described above included a net increase of Ps. 34,931,786 in depreciation, amortization and impairment, which was comprised in part of an impairment of Ps. 2,511,974 and was recognized as an increase in cost of sales and operating costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(2) Employee benefits:

As of January 1, 2011, the effect of PEMEX’s early adoption IAS 19, described above, was an increase in the reserve for employee benefits in the amount of Ps. 123,150,302 and a corresponding increase in accumulated losses on the initial statement of financial position under IFRS.

In addition, PEMEX eliminated the component of termination benefits from the liability for employee benefits under Mexican FRS, with a resulting amount of Ps. 2,485,334 credited against accumulated losses on the initial statement of financial position under IFRS.

As of December 31, 2011, the net effect in the reserve for employee benefits (in addition to the items described above) was a decrease of Ps. 8,220,365, which was comprised of (i) an increase in comprehensive loss in the amount of Ps. 26,061,015 and (ii) a decrease in cost of sales and operating costs and expenses in the amount of Ps. 34,281,380.

NOTE 21—DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEXICAN FRS AND U.S. GAAP:

PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS, which differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. As described in Note 3(a) to these consolidated financial statements, until December 31, 2007, PEMEX recognized the effects of inflation on its financial information in accordance with FRS B-10 “Effects of Inflation” (“FRS B-10”). In accordance with FRS B-10, in 2009, 2010 and 2011, effects of inflation were not recognized in the financial statements because the accumulated inflation over the three-year periods ending December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was less than 26%, and the economic environment therefore did not qualify as “inflationary.”

Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards CodificationTM (the “Codification,” or “ASC”)

The Codification is the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification became effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and superseded all previously existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is non-authoritative. All of PEMEX’s references to U.S. GAAP now use the Codification’s specific Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), Topic or Subtopic, rather than prior accounting and reporting standards. The Codification did not change existing U.S. GAAP and, therefore, has not affected PEMEX’s financial position or results of operations.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP, as they relate to PEMEX, are presented below together with explanations of certain adjustments that affect net loss and shareholders’ equity as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

   2011  2010  2009 
   

 

  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
 

Net loss for the year under Mexican FRS (Note 3(ab)(i))

  Ps.(91,483,321 Ps. (46,527,237 Ps.(94,369,846
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP adjustments:

    

Exploration and drilling costs (I(a))

   (866,712  (936,520  (1,016,089

Employee benefits (I(b) and II(d))

   5,997,038    7,246,105    27,836,172  

Accrued vacations, net (I(c))

   (25,753  (188,419  (155,404

Fixed asset adjustments:

    

Capitalized losses in respect of derivative financial instruments, net (I(d))

   (110,586  (110,586  (110,586

Capitalization of comprehensive financing result, net (I(e))

   (495,848  2,647,070    2,701,374  

Impairment, net (I(f))

   (10,027,942  12,410,886    2,413,928  

Gains (losses) in respect of derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements, net (I(g))

   (14,975,068  8,692,547    10,214,217  

Deferred income tax (II(h))

   1,829,129    41,797    46,014  

Reclassification of Pemex Finance net income to non-controlling interest (I(i))

   210,166    217,437    160,285  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP adjustments, net

   (18,465,576  30,020,317    42,089,911  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss for the year under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.  (109,948,897 Ps.  (16,506,920 Ps.(52,279,935
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) under U.S. GAAP:

    

Net loss for the year under U.S. GAAP (Note 3(ab)(i))

  Ps. (109,948,897 Ps. (16,506,920 Ps.(52,279,935

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Effect in equity of employee benefits (II(d))

   2,973,276    209,936,104    (229,690,261

Gains (losses) in respect of derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements, net (I(g))

   232,378    (390,909  2,532,882  

Fair value from investment securities (Note 8)(1)

   3,872,160          

Foreign currency translation effect

   4,761,765    (1,532,399  (2,183,412

Other

           52,364  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive (loss) income under U.S. GAAP

  Ps. (98,109,318 Ps.  191,505,876   Ps.  (281,568,362
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)PEMEX has reclassified Ps. 2,156,104 in 2009 from other comprehensive income (loss)—gains on available-for-sale investment securities to (accumulated losses) retained earnings in equity with the purpose of enhancing the presentation of comprehensive (loss) income under U.S. GAAP. The reclassification did not affect the total value of equity under U.S. GAAP.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

   2011  2010 

Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss under U.S. GAAP as of December 31:

   

Derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements (I(g))

  Ps.   Ps.(232,378

Effect in equity of employee benefits (II(d))

   (142,963,629  (145,936,905

Foreign currency translation effect

   8,064,059    3,302,294  

Fair value from investment securities (Note 8)

   3,872,160      

Other

   758,862    758,862  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)

  Ps.  (130,268,548 Ps.  (142,108,127
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)PEMEX has reclassified Ps. 8,935,976 in each of 2011 and 2010 from accumulated other comprehensive loss—gains on available-for-sale investment securities to (accumulated losses) retained earnings in equity with the purpose of enhancing the presentation of accumulated other comprehensive loss under U.S. GAAP. The reclassification did not affect the total value of equity under U.S. GAAP.

   2011  2010 
   

 

  (Restated
Note (3(ab)(i))
 

Equity (deficit) is reconciled as follows:

   

Deficit under Mexican FRS (Note 3(ab)(i))

  Ps.  (193,919,129 Ps.  (111,302,111
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP adjustments:

   

Exploration and drilling costs (I(a))

   8,533,634    9,400,346  

Employee benefits (II(d))

   29,123,622    23,126,584  

Effect in equity of employee benefits (II(d))

   (142,963,629  (145,936,905

Accrued vacations (I(c))

   (1,148,517  (1,122,764

Fixed asset adjustments:

   

Capitalized gains in respect of hedging derivative financial instruments, net (I(d))

   1,231,821    1,342,407  

Capitalization of comprehensive financing result, net (I(e))

   552,955    1,048,803  

Impairment, net (I(f))

   (18,565,881  (8,537,939

Derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements (I(g))

   (11,256,402  3,718,666  

Deferred income tax (II(h))

   2,209,721    380,592  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP adjustments, net

   (132,282,676  (116,580,210
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deficit under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.  (326,201,805 Ps.  (227,882,321
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

��

   2011  2010 
   

 

  (Restated
Note (3(ab)(i))
 

Changes in U.S. GAAP equity for the year ended December 31:

   

Deficit at January 1

  Ps.  (227,882,321 Ps.  (421,613,279

Net loss for the period

   (109,948,897  (16,506,920

Mexican Government increase in equity of Subsidiary Entities

       122  

Other

       2,442,397  

Other comprehensive loss:

   

Effect in equity of employee benefits (II(d))

   2,973,276    209,936,104  

Derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements (I(g))

   232,378    (390,909

Foreign currency translation effect

   4,761,765    (1,532,399

Fair value from investment securities (Note 8)

   3,872,160      

Non-controlling interest (I(i))

   (210,166  (217,437
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deficit as of December 31 under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.  (326,201,805 Ps.  (227,882,321
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

I.    Explanation of reconciling items:

(a)Exploration and drilling costs

Effective on January 1, 2004, for Mexican FRS purposes, PEMEX changed its accounting policy for the recognition of well exploration and drilling costs to the successful efforts method of accounting. Therefore, since January 1, 2004, there has not been any related difference between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP.

Under the successful efforts method of accounting, costs of drilling exploratory wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells are initially capitalized and are later charged to expenses if proved reserves are not discovered. Development costs, including the costs of drilling development wells and development-type stratigraphic test wells, are capitalized. The capitalized costs of wells and related equipment are amortized on a UOP (Unit of Production) basis over proved developed reserves, as the related oil and gas reserves are extracted.

Consequently, as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the U.S. GAAP equity adjustment represented the cumulative costs of capitalized unsuccessful wells in proven areas under U.S. GAAP, not capitalized under Mexican FRS through December 31, 2003, net of the amortization of such capitalized amounts. The 2011, 2010 and 2009 U.S. GAAP net loss adjustment reflects the amortization of such capitalized costs on a UOP basis.

ASC Topic 932-10-05 “Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas” (“Topic 932”) addresses the circumstances that would permit the continued capitalization of exploratory well costs beyond one year, other than when additional exploration wells are necessary to justify major capital expenditures and drilling of those wells is under way or firmly planned for the near future. Under the provisions of Topic 932, exploration costs would continue to be capitalized after the completion of drilling when (a) a quantity of reserves sufficient to justify completion as a producing well has been found in the well and (b) the enterprise is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. If either condition is not met, or if an enterprise

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

obtains information that raises substantial doubt about the economic or operational viability of the project, the exploratory well would be assumed to be impaired, and its costs, net of any salvage value, would be charged to expenses. Topic 932 provides a number of indicators that need to be present to demonstrate that sufficient progress has been made in assessing the reserves and the economic viability of the project.

PEMEX’s policy is to determine whether or not exploratory well costs are capitalized or expensed shortly after completion of drilling. As such, PEMEX does not have significant suspended well costs for the three years ended December 31, 2011. No capitalized exploratory well costs have been charged to expenses since the adoption of Topic 932.

(b)Employee benefits

Under U.S. GAAP, PEMEX has recognized ASC Topic 715 “Compensation—Retirement Benefits” (“Topic 715”) and included its effects in the results of the actuarial valuation of its labor obligations.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Under Mexican FRS, PEMEX follows FRS D-3, which establishes the procedures for measuring the expenses and liabilities for pension plans, seniority premiums and severance payments. The main differences between PEMEX’s application of FRS D-3 and the U.S. GAAP guidance provided in Topic 715 regarding accounting for seniority premiums, pensions, health services and other supplemental payments provided to retirees and other eligible family members are summarized as follows:

Item

FRS D-3

Topic 715

Adoption dateJanuary 1, 2008January 1, 2007
Assumptions (Nominal Rates)No differenceNo difference
Salary increases due to promotionsNo differenceNo difference
Net periodic costNo differenceNo difference

Minimum liability to be recognized: Projected Benefit Obligations (PBO)

No differenceNo difference

Unamortized and unrecognized items: Retirement benefits


Initial transition liability and salary increases due to promotions to be recognized over a maximum of five years.

Plan amendments and actuarial gains and losses for the period to be recognized over the employees’ average remaining labor life.


Recognize the total outstanding items as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss/Income (“AOCI”) for retirement and post-retirement benefits, as an adjustment to equity.
Termination benefits

Initial transition liability and plan amendments to be recognized over a maximum of five years.

Salary increases due to promotions to be recognized over a maximum of one year.

Actuarial gains and losses are immediately recognized.

Recognize the total outstanding items as a component of AOCI for retirement and post-retirement benefits, as an adjustment to equity.

Unfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligations (ABO)

N/AN/A

Recognition of additional minimum liability

N/AN/A

Recognition of intangible assets and other comprehensive income


N/A



In the year of recognition of actuarial gains/losses and past service costs/credits, there is also a write-off of an equivalent amount in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) under Topic 715.

Disclosure in the statement of financial position of noncurrent assets, current liabilities, and noncurrent liabilities




N/A




Required (for retirement and post-retirement benefits).

Note: N/A means not applicable.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(c)Accrued vacations

Under Mexican FRS, PEMEX recognizes vacation expenses when the vacations are utilized by its employees. Under U.S. GAAP, vacation expense is accrued when it is earned by the employee.

(d)Fixed assets—Capitalized gains and losses in respect of derivative financial instruments

Under Mexican FRS, finance costs related to loans allocated to construction projects, including the net gains and losses arising from DFIs designated as hedges, are capitalized as part of capitalized interest.

Under ASC Subtopic 815-25-35 “Derivatives and Hedging—Fair Value Hedges— Subsequent Measurements,” gains and losses arising from financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges cannot be capitalized as part of qualifying assets. Gains and losses arising from fair value hedges are capitalized and the basis adjustment is amortized as interest income or interest expense over the expected remaining life of the interest-bearing instrument, using the effective yield method.

Through December 31, 2008, the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163 issued debt securities through inter-company private placements to Petróleos Mexicanos for the purpose of funding PIDIREGAS-related projects. As discussed in Note 2, amendments to the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability became effective in November 2008. Effective January 1, 2009, in connection with these amendments, Petróleos Mexicanos assumed primary responsibility for the payment of all indebtedness of the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163, respectively. However, the Master Trust and Fideicomiso F/163, as applicable, continued to act as servicer of all indebtedness until Petróleos Mexicanos legally assumed, as primary obligor, their indebtedness under the related agreements (see Note 3(b)). These legal assumptions were carried out during the second half of 2009. In addition, all of these inter-company private placements were canceled effective January 30, 2009, as a result of the changes to the Federal Law of Budget and Fiscal Accountability. These financings had been hedged through DFIs, but in connection with the amendments described above, PEMEX decided to remove such designation and discontinue the hedging activities of those derivatives related to PIDIREGAS financings. Accordingly, for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 there were no capitalized gain or loss adjustments related to cash flow hedge derivatives covering the financings entered into for infrastructure projects.

The 2011, 2010 and 2009 adjustments to net loss consist only of a negative adjustment of Ps. 110,586 for each period, related to the reversal of the amortization of gains capitalized in prior periods.

(e)Fixed assets—Capitalization of Comprehensive Financing Result

Effective January 1, 2007, PEMEX adopted FRS D-6 “Capitalization of Comprehensive Financing Result,” which establishes the rules applicable to the capitalization of the CFR attributable to certain assets, whose acquisition required a substantial (prolonged) period before their intended use.

The capitalized CFR is composed of interest cost, foreign exchange effect and other costs associated with obtaining financing identified with qualifying assets, which directly affect the investment cost during the acquisition period.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Interest costs and the foreign exchange effect for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, for Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP purposes, were allocated as follows:

   2011   2010   2009 

Under Mexican FRS:

      

Interest and foreign exchange fluctuation capitalized

  Ps.5,634,981    Ps.564,691    Ps.2,054,190  

Interest expense

   62,631,063     74,382,083     78,300,095  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest cost and foreign exchange fluctuation

  Ps.    68,266,044    Ps.    74,946,774    Ps.    80,354,285  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Under U.S. GAAP:

      

Interest capitalized

  Ps.4,292,351    Ps.2,295,178    Ps.3,813,746  

Interest expense and foreign exchange fluctuation

   63,973,693     72,651,596     76,540,539  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest cost and foreign exchange fluctuation

  Ps.68,266,044    Ps.74,946,774    Ps.80,354,285  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During 2011, 2010 and 2009, the difference between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP was the net foreign exchange effect of Ps. (1,342,630), Ps. 1,730,487 and Ps. 1,759,556, respectively, capitalized under Mexican FRS.

In addition, the net income adjustments for capitalized interest presented herein also include a reversal of depreciation of Ps. 846,782, Ps. 916,583 and Ps. 941,818 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to the cumulative difference in amounts previously capitalized for such assets because the cumulative amounts capitalized under Mexican FRS have exceeded those amounts under U.S. GAAP.

(f)    Fixed assets—Impairment

For Mexican FRS purposes, as described in Note 3(o), PEMEX evaluates the impairment of long-lived assets whenever there are events or circumstances indicating that the book value of a given asset may not be recoverable under Bulletin C-15.

For each of the cash-generating units, if the book value of the long-lived assets exceeds the estimated future value (discounted) of cash flows recoverable by such long-lived assets, a charge is made to income for the period for an impairment loss. PEMEX performs this calculation at least annually. In accordance with Bulletin C-15, the impairment recorded can be reversed in subsequent periods if the subsequent impairment analysis does not indicate a loss in such future periods.

For U.S. GAAP purposes, an evaluation of impairment is undertaken whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, as is the case under Mexican FRS. However, under U.S. GAAP, the impairment criteria are met when the carrying value of assets exceeds the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without financing charges) of the related assets. The asset is written down to fair value as determined by using the present value of expected future cash flows. U.S. GAAP does not allow for reversal of losses. PEMEX measures impairment of its oil and gas producing assets based on the undiscounted estimated future cash flows associated with estimated proved reserves on a field-by-field basis.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

In order to determine the amount of any impairment of long-lived assets that can be recognized under U.S. GAAP, PEMEX must perform a two-step process. The first step involves the determination of whether the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is recoverable by calculating the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without financing charges) resulting from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The second step involves a comparison of the asset’s carrying amount to its fair value. Under U.S. GAAP, the impairment of an asset may be recorded if the asset’s carrying value exceeds the sum of expected future cash flows from the related asset. Conversely, Mexican FRS does not require a two-step impairment evaluation process for long-lived assets and instead only requires a direct comparison of an asset’s fair value to its carrying value. If an asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss on such asset may be recognized under Mexican FRS.

In determining the estimated future cash flows for impairment purposes for all periods presented, the effect of hydrocarbon duties based on sales to third parties have not been included in the net cash flows calculation for either Mexican FRS or U.S. GAAP. PEMEX’s management believes that the hydrocarbon duties paid are similar in nature to income taxes or dividend distributions payable to a parent, and therefore are properly excluded from the net cash flow calculation.

Under Mexican FRS, Bulletin C-15 became effective on January 1, 2004. Prior to this bulletin becoming effective, under U.S. GAAP, PEMEX would recognize an impairment charge in the U.S. GAAP net (loss) income reconciliation. During 2010 and 2009, PEMEX recognized an impairment charge under Mexican FRS of Ps. 11,689,832 and Ps. 1,731,229, respectively. During 2011, no impairment charge was recognized under either Mexican FRS or U.S. GAAP.

In accordance with Mexican FRS, as of December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of certain long-lived assets exceeded the estimated future value (discounted) of cash flows recoverable from such assets. An impairment loss of Ps. 11,689,832 was therefore recorded for such assets for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, under U.S. GAAP, no impairment loss was recognized for those long-lived assets in 2010, as their carrying value was considered to be recoverable (because it exceeded the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets). Therefore, the impairment loss of Ps. 11,689,832 for 2010 was reversed in the U.S. GAAP reconciliation.

The 2011, 2010 and 2009 U.S. GAAP net loss reconciliation also includes a credit of Ps. 1,661,890, Ps. 2,452,283 and Ps. 2,413,928, respectively, for depreciation due to the difference in carrying values of long-lived assets between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP.

In addition, the 2011 and 2010 U.S. GAAP net loss reconciliation includes a debit of Ps. 11,689,832 and Ps. 1,731,229, respectively, because the impairment reversals recognized under Mexican FRS in each of those years are not permitted under U.S. GAAP.

(g)Accounting for derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements

Derivative financial instruments (DFIs)

For U.S. GAAP purposes, PEMEX applies ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (formerly SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended) (“Topic 815”), which requires that all derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recognized in the statement of financial position as assets or liabilities at their fair values and that changes to fair values be recognized immediately in earnings, unless the derivative qualifies as a “hedge” (as defined in Topic 815), for which certain special accounting treatment is permitted.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, hedge effectiveness is assessed consistently with the method and risk management strategy documented for each hedging relationship. PEMEX assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship prospectively and retrospectively to ensure that the application of hedge accounting treatment was appropriate at the designation date and continues to be appropriate for subsequent future periods. PEMEX considers hedge accounting to be appropriate if the assessment of hedge effectiveness indicates that the change in fair value of the designated hedging instrument is highly effective at offsetting the change in fair value or cash flow variability due to the hedged risk of the hedged item or transaction.

If a derivative instrument qualifies as a fair value hedge, the change in the fair value of the derivative and the change in the fair value of the hedged item that is due to the hedged risks are recorded in earnings based on the income classification of the item being hedged. These hedges also adjust the book values of the derivatives and hedged items. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, PEMEX did not have any derivative instruments classified as fair value hedges.

If a derivative instrument qualifies as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the hedging instrument’s gain or loss is reported as a change in stockholders’ equity (as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, or “AOCI”) and is reclassified into earnings in the period during which the transaction being hedged affects earnings. Effective gains or losses reclassified from stockholders’ equity to earnings are classified in accordance with the earnings treatment of the hedged transaction. The ineffective portion of the hedging instrument’s gain or loss is recognized in the statement of operations in the CFR. If a derivative instrument does not qualify as a hedge under the applicable guidance, the change in the fair value of the derivative is immediately recognized in the statement of operations in the CFR.

PEMEX also evaluates contracts for “embedded” derivatives, and considers whether any embedded derivatives have to be bifurcated, or separated, from the host contracts in accordance with Topic 815 requirements. Embedded derivatives may have terms that are not clearly and closely related to the terms of the host contract in which they are included. If embedded derivatives exist that are not clearly and closely related to the host contract or include either leverage features or exposure to the substantial loss of the principal in the case of structured products, they are accounted for separately from the host contract as freestanding derivatives, with changes in their fair value recorded in current earnings in the CFR to the extent that the hybrid instrument is not already recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings.

When hedge accounting is discontinued under the fair value hedge accounting model due to PEMEX’s determination that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair value hedge, PEMEX will continue to carry the derivative on the statement of financial position at its fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings under the CFR item. The related hedged asset, liability or firm commitment will cease to be adjusted for changes in fair value that are due to the previously hedged risk and subsequent interest accrual will be recognized based on the new effective interest yield or funding cost, taking into account the fair value hedge adjustment amount as of the termination date of the hedge relationship.When PEMEX discontinues hedge accounting in a cash flow hedge relationship because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period or within two months, the effective gain or loss on the derivative remaining in AOCI is reclassified immediately into earnings; if a derivative instrument ceases to meet the criteria for hedge accounting, any subsequent gains or losses are recognized in current earnings and the effective portion, as of the date the cash flow hedge relationship ceased to exist, is recorded in earnings based on where the hedged item had an effect, in the amount needed to achieve the effective yield or funding cost provided by the derivative while the hedged item still impacts earnings.

The remaining adjustment of the carrying amount of a fair value hedged asset, liability or firm commitment will remain part of the carrying amount of that asset, liability or firm commitment until the asset or liability is

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

sold or written off, the liability expires, is paid or transferred or the firm commitment ceases to exist. In fair value hedges, an adjustment of the carrying amount of a hedged interest-bearing financial instrument will be amortized to earnings as part of the new effective yield; amortization will begin no later than when the hedged item ceases to be adjusted for changes in its fair value attributable to the risk being hedged.

For Mexican FRS purposes, effective on January 1, 2005, PEMEX adopted the provisions of Bulletin C-10, “Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Operations” (“Bulletin C-10”). Bulletin C-10 contains provisions similar to those of Topic 815, and provides expanded guidance for the recognition, valuation, accounting treatment and disclosure applicable to DFIs, such as hedges and embedded derivatives, including the need for contemporaneous hedge documentation and effectiveness testing requirements.

Similar to the requirements under U.S. GAAP, contracts need to be assessed for embedded derivatives with such derivatives needing to be bifurcated from the host contracts under certain conditions and recognized at fair value with fluctuations recognized in earnings. For Mexican FRS purposes, PEMEX, in accordance with Bulletin C-10, evaluated the potential existence of embedded derivatives within several contractual agreements related to, among other things, services in connection with construction projects, acquisitions, leases and insurance commitments. These agreements were entered into by PEMEX and denominated in foreign currencies and, in accordance with their terms, the related foreign currency components generate embedded derivatives, but these embedded derivatives are not required to be bifurcated from the host contracts under Bulletin C-10, because the agreements do not meet the net settlement criteria. For U.S. GAAP purposes, however, foreign currency embedded derivatives in either recognized financial instruments or non-recognized contractual agreements are bifurcated from host contracts when the payments under such contracts are not denominated in one of the functional currencies of either of the counterparties.

Therefore, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there are differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP related to accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities (including embedded derivatives attributable to an embedded non-functional currency component).

As a result of the above, PEMEX has recognized a U.S. GAAP adjustment for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, representing a net (loss) gain of Ps. (10,216,010), Ps. 14,318,464 and Ps. 11,862,782, respectively, reported in the CFR in the consolidated statements of operations.

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, PEMEX recognized a net gain (loss) of Ps. 232,378, Ps. (390,909) and Ps. 2,532,882, respectively, reported as “gains (losses) in respect of derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements, net” in the consolidated other comprehensive income (loss) statement under U.S. GAAP.

As to permissible exclusions under both Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP, for hedge effectiveness testing on formalized hedge relationships, PEMEX uses all components of each derivative’s gain or loss that were included in the assessment and measurement of hedge effectiveness, except for the time value (extrinsic value changes) in the case of option contracts. The time value exclusion effect with respect to options-based hedges is reflected in the CFR within earnings.

The valuation of PEMEX’s DFIs portfolio is based on market information obtained from established independent sources of market prices, as well as pricing information provided by the major world trading markets, including the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) and the Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”). PEMEX’s DFIs portfolio does not contain any exotic instruments whose valuation would require reference to parameters or inputs, i.e., parameters that cannot be implied from liquid instruments readily observable in the financial markets.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The following table presents the location on the statement of financial position and the fair value of PEMEX’s DFIs (including both DFIs that have not reached maturity and those that have reached maturity but have not been settled), as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010. See Note 12 for additional information relating to the fair values of PEMEX’s DFIs.2012:

 

  

Derivatives Assets

 
    Fair Value 
  

Location in Statement of Financial
Position

 2011  2010 

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under Topic 815

  

Petroleum Product Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments Ps.                    —   Ps.     4,888,896  

Futures

 Derivative financial instruments      13,430  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under Topic 815

      4,902,326  

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815

  

Embedded derivatives

 Derivative financial instruments  4,992,412    9,979,543  

Cross-Currency Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  7,476,570    9,222,957  

Equity Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  2,363,900    1,722,733  

Petroleum Product Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  116,651      

Futures

 Derivative financial instruments  608,311      

Options

 Derivative financial instruments  3,283,428    78,376  

Natural Gas Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  613,496    2,623,488  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815

  19,454,768    23,627,097  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 Ps.19,454,768   Ps.28,529,423  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  

Derivatives Liabilities

 
    Fair Value 
  

Location in Statement of Financial
Position

 2011  2010 

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under Topic 815

  

Petroleum Product Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments Ps.   Ps.     (4,859,809
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under Topic 815

      (4,859,809

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815

  

Embedded derivatives

 Derivative financial instruments  (6,398,862  (2,544,765

Interest Rate Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  (802,178  (1,193,850

Cross-Currency Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  (5,041,072  (3,023,008

Equity Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  (871,403  (7,280

Petroleum Product Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  (45,040    

Forwards

 Derivative financial instruments  (272,041    

Options

 Derivative financial instruments  (3,265,359  (79,382

Natural Gas Swaps

 Derivative financial instruments  (616,999  (2,593,342
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Topic 815

  (17,312,954  (9,441,627
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 Ps. (17,312,954 Ps.  (14,301,436
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Derivatives Assets 
   Location in Statement
of Financial Position
   Fair Value 

Derivatives not designated as

hedging instruments

    December 31,
2013
   December 31,
2012
 

Embedded Derivatives

   Derivative financial instruments    Ps.—      Ps.—    

Forwards

   Derivative financial instruments     158,156     —    

Futures

   Derivative financial instruments     —       —    

Stock Options

   Derivative financial instruments     119,367     1,433,769  

Natural Gas Options

   Derivative financial instruments     23,930     13,979  

Equity Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     991,346     31,762  

Cross-currency Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     5,342,656     7,211,988  

Natural Gas Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     5,731     159,110  

Petroleum Product Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     —       80,908  

Propane Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     —       —    

Interest Rate Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     100,454     —    

Others

   Derivative financial instruments     —       118,637  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

  

   6,741,640     9,050,153  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

  

  Ps. 6,741,640    Ps. 9,050,153  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

   Derivatives Liabilities 
       Fair Value 

Derivatives not designated

as hedging instruments

  Location in Statement
of Financial Position
   December 31,
2013
   December 31,
2012
 

Embedded Derivatives

   Derivative financial instruments    Ps.—      Ps.—    

Forwards

   Derivative financial instruments     —       (41,795)  

Futures

   Derivative financial instruments     —       —    

Stock Options

   Derivative financial instruments     (17,901)     —    

Natural Gas Options

   Derivative financial instruments     (23,757)     (13,733)  

Equity Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     (445,966)     (2,062,429)  

Cross-currency Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     (5,728,458)     (4,095,366)  

Natural Gas Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     (3,965)     (153,746)  

Petroleum Product Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     —       (9,490)  

Propane Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     —       —    

Interest Rate Swaps

   Derivative financial instruments     (64,435)     (333,919)  

Others

   Derivative financial instruments     —       (42,333)  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

  

   (6,284,482)     (6,752,811)  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

  

  Ps. (6,284,482)    Ps. (6,752,811)  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Total

  

  Ps.457,158    Ps.2,297,342  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents the gain (loss) recognized in income and other comprehensive income (“OCI”) on PEMEX’s DFIs for the years ended December 31, 20112013, 2012 and 2010,2011, and the line location in the financial statements of such gains and losses.

 

Derivatives Designated as Cash
Flow Hedges Under Topic 815

  Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
(Effective Portion)
 Location of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI into
Income (Effective
Portion)
  Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from AOCI into
Income (Effective Portion)
 

Derivatives not designated

as hedging instruments

  Location of Gain
(Loss) Recognized
in Statement of
Operations on
Derivatives
   Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Statement of
Operations on Derivatives
 
  2011             2010              2011   2010       2013   2012   2011 

Embedded Derivatives

   Financing cost    Ps.—      Ps.—      Ps.(277,042)  

Forwards

   Financing cost     186,857     (120,753)     (280,248)  

Futures

   Financing cost     (129,329)     (1,098,645)     (1,880,401)  

Stock Options

   Financing cost     (1,241,765)     1,418,503     (1,275,188)  

Natural Gas Options

   Financing cost     3,587     6,402     31,451  

Equity Swaps

   Financing cost     4,726,258     (7,211,961)     2,129,389  

Cross-currency Swaps

   Financing cost     (2,166,762)     664,773     571,822  

Natural Gas Swaps

   Financing cost     8,931     1,472     71,071  

Petroleum Product Swaps

   Financing cost     (89,020)     (130,662)     (594,694)  

Propane Swaps

   Financing cost     20     205,366     —    

Interest Rate Swaps

  Ps.              —    Ps.             —   Comprehensive
financing result
  Ps.    Ps.(15,784   Financing cost     58,744     (103,123)     (192,618)  

Cross-Currency Swaps

                    —   Comprehensive
financing result
        (7,203

Petroleum Product Swaps

               —     (98,197 Net sales               —     833,182  

Petroleum Product Swaps

           Cost of sales        (748,722

Futures

        (132,831 Net sales        2,713,159  

Futures

           Cost of sales        (2,908,704

Others

   Financing cost     (46,548)     110,980     233  
  

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  Ps.    Ps.(231,028   Ps.    Ps.      (134,072

Total

  

  Ps.1,310,973    Ps. (6,257,648)    Ps. (1,696,225)  
  

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments under Topic 815

  

Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Statement of Operations on Derivatives

  Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Statement of Operations on Derivatives
 
      2011            2010           

Embedded Derivatives

  Comprehensive financing result  Ps.  (12,676,642 Ps.  10,760,092  

Interest Rate Swaps

  Comprehensive financing result   (201,681  (1,555,468

Cross-Currency Swaps

  Comprehensive financing result   (1,813,168  (3,000,826

Equity Swaps

  Comprehensive financing result   2,094,034    1,183,594  

Petroleum Product Swaps

  Comprehensive financing result   (594,694    

Futures

  Comprehensive financing result   (1,880,401  (56,096

Forwards

  Comprehensive financing result   (274,918    

Options

  Comprehensive financing result   (1,290,440  166,753  

Natural Gas Swaps

  Comprehensive financing result   14,565    (42,257
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    Ps.    (16,623,345 Ps.7,455,792  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(c)Fair value measurementshierarchy

Additionally, for U.S. GAAP purposes, PEMEX applies ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures” (formerly SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) (“Topic 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for the measurement of fair value and enhances disclosure about fair value measurements.

In accordance with Topic 820, PEMEX values its DFIs under standard methodologies commonly applied in the financial markets. PEMEX’s related assumptions therefore fall under Level 2 of the Topic 820 fair value hierarchy for market participant assumptions, as described below.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Pursuant to the provisions of Topic 820,The fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observed for assets or liabilities. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the assets or liabilities. Management uses appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of PEMEX’s applicable assets and liabilities.

When available, PEMEX measures fair value using Level 1 inputs, because they generally provide the most reliable evidence of fair value.

PEMEX periodically evaluates its exposure to international hydrocarbon prices, interest rates and foreign currencies and uses derivative instruments as a mitigation mechanism when potential sources of market risk are identified.

The following tables present information about PEMEX’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized to determine the fair values as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010. PEMEX’s accounting for these assets and liabilities was impacted by the adoption of Topic 820, as described below.2012.

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using       Fair value hierarchy   Total as of
December 31,

2013
 
  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
    Significant Other 
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
     Total as of  
December 31,
2011
   Level 1   Level 2 Level 3   

Assets:

               

Derivative financial instruments

  Ps.             —    Ps.  19,454,768    Ps.    Ps.  19,454,768    Ps.—      Ps.6,741,640   Ps. —      Ps.6,741,640  

Available-for-sale investment securities

               —     24,655,980                 —     24,655,980  

Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

        12,913,364          12,913,364  

Investments in equity instruments

   17,728,490     81    —       17,728,571  

Permanent investments in associates

   —       16,779,501    —       16,779,501  

Liabilities:

               

Derivative financial instruments

        17,312,954          17,312,954     —       (6,284,482  —       (6,284,482

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using       Fair value hierarchy   Total as of
December 31,

2012
 
  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total as of  
December 31,
2010
   Level 1   Level 2 Level 3   

Assets:

               

Derivative financial instruments

  Ps.             —    Ps.  28,529,423    Ps.    Ps.  28,529,423    Ps.—      Ps.9,050,153   Ps. —      Ps.9,050,153  

Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

               —     11,116,080                 —     11,116,080  

Investments in equity instruments

   15,771,202     57    —       15,771,259  

Permanent investments in associates

   —       14,646,263    —       14,646,263  

Liabilities:

               

Derivative financial instruments

        14,301,436          14,301,436     —       (6,752,811  —       (6,752,811

Where directly comparable market quotes are not available to measure the fair value of PEMEX’s financial instruments, PEMEX uses Level 2 valuation to calculate fair value based on quotes from major market sources. These market quotes are then adjusted internally using standard market pricing models for interest rate, currency, equity and commodities derivatives.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, PEMEX has recognized a negative adjustment of Ps. 4,759,058, Ps. 5,625,917 and Ps. 1,648,565, respectively, in its U.S. GAAP reconciliation, representing the credit risk adjustment required by Topic 820 on the fair value of PEMEX’s DFIs, reported in the CFR in the consolidated statements of operations.

The estimated fair value of the remaining financial assets and liabilities, as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012 in nominal terms, was as follows:

 

  2011   2010  December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 
  Carrying Value   Fair Value   Carrying Value   Fair Value  Carrying value Fair value Carrying value Fair value 

Assets:

            

Cash and cash equivalents

  Ps.    114,535,211    Ps.    114,535,211    Ps.    131,300,852    Ps.    131,300,852   Ps.80,745,719   Ps.80,745,719   Ps. 119,234,891   Ps. 119,234,891  

Accounts, notes receivable and other

   157,223,569     157,223,569     123,173,610     123,173,610    122,512,011    122,512,011   133,009,511   133,009,511  

Liabilities:

            

Suppliers

   53,313,171     53,313,171     43,474,439     43,474,439    106,745,193    106,745,193   61,513,451   61,513,451  

Accounts and accumulated expenses payable

   13,109,526     13,109,526     9,602,215     9,602,215    14,194,719    14,194,719   9,315,539   9,315,539  

Taxes payable

   65,770,459     65,770,459     52,565,900     52,565,900  

Current portion of long-term debt

   110,497,449     110,497,449     89,554,617     89,554,617    90,676,943    90,676,943   114,241,005   114,241,005  

Long-term debt

   672,275,110     678,196,479     575,170,797     573,067,833    750,563,471    795,134,654   672,617,595   719,937,119  

Pursuant to Topic 820, theThe fair values of the financial current assets and current liabilities presented in the table above appear for informational purposes only and they fall under Level 2 of the Topic 820 fair value hierarchy.purposes.

The fair values of current financial assets and short-term liabilities are equal to their nominal values because, due to their short-term maturities, their nominal values are very close to their corresponding fair values.

The fair value of long-term debt is estimated using quotes from major market sources which are then adjusted internally using standard market pricing models. As a result of relevant assumptions, estimated fair values do not necessarily represent the actual terms at which existing transactions could be liquidated or unwound.

PursuantThe information related to ASC Topic 360 “Property, Plant“Cash and Equipment” (formerly SFAS No. 144, “Accountingcash equivalents,” “Accounts, notes receivable and other,” “Investments in equity instruments,” “Permanent investments in associates” and “Debt” is described in the following notes, respectively:

Note 5, Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash;

Note 6, Accounts, Notes Receivable and Other;

Note 8, Investments in Equity Instruments;

Note 9, Permanent Investments in Associates; and

Note 12, Debt.

NOTE 14—EMPLOYEE BENEFITS:

PEMEX has established defined benefit plans for the Impairment or Disposalretirement of Long-Lived Assets”) (“Topic 360”), PEMEX reviews its properties for impairment when events and circumstances indicate a possible decline inemployees, to which only the recoverability of the carrying value of such property. PEMEX estimates the future cash flows expected in connection with the property and compares such future cash flows to the carrying amount of the property to determine whether the carrying amount is recoverable. If the carrying amount of the property exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying amount of the property is reduced to its estimated fair value. Fair value may be estimated using comparable market data, a discounted cash flow method, or a combination of both. In the discounted cash flow method, estimated future cash flowsemployer contributes. Benefits under these plans are based on management’s expectations for the futurean employee’s salary and include estimatesyears of future oilservice completed at retirement. Obligations and gas production, commodity prices based on published forward commodity price curves ascosts of such plans are recorded in accordance with actuarial valuations performed by independent actuaries. The regulatory framework of the date of the estimate, operatingplan assets does not establish minimum funding requirements. PEMEX has also established plans for other post-employment benefit obligations whose actuarial amounts are determined by independent actuaries. Such plans include medical services to retired employees and development costs,their dependents and a risk adjusted discount rate.

During 2011 and 2010, PEMEX’s properties were not impaired when determining fair value measurement under U.S. GAAP, that is, the estimated future cash flows from PEMEX’s properties exceeded their carrying value, so no impairment charge was required under U.S. GAAP.provided for basic necessities.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

PEMEX funds its employees benefits through Mexican trusts, the resources of which come from the seniority premium item of PEMEX’s annual budget (programmable expense), or any other item that substitutes or relates to this item, or that is associated to the same item and the interests, dividends or capital gains obtained from the investments of the trusts.

During 2013 there were no changes to the benefits of the plans, nor was any reduction events and early extinguishment of employee benefit obligations.

The following table show the amounts associated with PEMEX’s labor obligations:

   December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Liability for defined benefits at retirement and post-employment at the end of the year

  Ps. 1,106,039,249    Ps. 1,270,595,644  

Liability for other long-term benefits

   13,168,621     17,945,115  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liability for defined benefits recognized in the statement of financial consolidated position at the end of the year

  Ps. 1,119,207,870    Ps. 1,288,540,759  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following tables contain detailed information regarding PEMEX’s retirement and post-employment benefits:

Changes in the Liability for Defined Benefits

   2013  2012 

Liability for defined benefits at the beginning of year

  Ps. 1,270,595,644   Ps.849,254,113  

Charge to income for the year

   120,154,689    91,481,743  

Defined benefits paid by the fund

   (3,965,258  (4,490,055

Contributions paid to the fund

   (33,210,277  (30,796,230

Actuarial (gains) losses in other comprehensive result due to variances in assumptions

   (247,535,549  365,146,073  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Defined benefit liabilities at end of year

  Ps. 1,106,039,249   Ps. 1,270,595,644  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

In 2013 and 2012, the net actuarial gains of Ps. (247,535,549) and losses of Ps. 365,146,073, respectively, were primarily due to the following modifications to the actuarial assumptions:

 

(h)Deferred income taxes(i)increases in the discount and expected return on plan assets rates, from 6.90% in 2012 to 8.45% in 2013; and

(ii)increases in the rate of increase in the cost of medical services from 6.79% in 2012 to 7.65% in 2013.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Changes in Plan Assets

   2013  2012 

Plan assets at the beginning of year

  Ps.5,049,225   Ps.4,977,231  

Expected return on plan assets

   975,488    1,187,856  

Payments by the fund

   (34,819,235  (31,490,428

Company contributions to the fund

   33,210,277    30,796,230  

Actuarial (gains) losses in plan assets

   (97,326  (421,664
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Plan assets at the end of the year

  Ps.4,318,429   Ps.5,049,225  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Changes in Defined Benefit Obligations

   2013  2012 

Defined benefit obligations at the beginning of year

  Ps. 1,275,644,867   Ps.854,161,562  

Service costs

   34,677,009    20,518,547  

Financing costs

   86,393,563    71,820,624  

Past service costs

   (66,637  7,745  

Payments by the fund

   (38,723,945  (35,915,595

Actuarial (gains) losses (remeasurements) in accumulated defined benefit obligations (“OBD”) derived from changes in actuarial assumptions

   (247,567,178  365,051,984  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligations at the end of year

  Ps. 1,110,357,679   Ps. 1,275,644,867  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The asset ceiling test was not applied because there was a deficit of labor liabilities at the beginning and end of the year.

The effect of an increase or decrease of one percentage point in the assumed variation rate is a 13.17% decrease or a 16.73% increase in defined benefit obligations, respectively.

The effect of an increase or decrease of one percentage point in the assumed variation rate with respect to the cost and obligations related to medical services point is a 23.29% increase or a 17.76% decrease in defined benefit obligations, respectively.

Assumptions regarding future mortality are based on EMSSA2009 to Circular S 22.2 of theComisión Nacional de Seguros y Fianzas (National Commission of Insurance and Bonds). The SHCP also provides recommendations concerning actuarial valuations to entities of the Federal Public Administration.

The effects discussed above were determined using the projected unit credit method, which is the applied method in prior years.

The expected contribution to the fund for next year amounts to Ps. 38,029,665.

The average length of a defined benefit obligation is 18.4 years.

PEMEX’s plan assets are held in two trusts, the FOLAPE and the FICOLAVI, which are managed by BBVA Bancomer, S.A. and a technical committee for each trust that is comprised of personnel from Petróleos Mexicanos and the trusts.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

As describedof December 31, 2013 and 2012, the amounts and types of plan assets are as follows:

   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 1,622,166     Ps. 3,017,245  

Equity instruments

   541,262     410,357  

Debt instruments

   2,155,001     1,621,623  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total plan assets

   Ps. 4,318,429     Ps. 5,049,225  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following tables present additional fair value disclosure about plan assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013 
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Total 

Asset Category:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 1,622,166     Ps. —       Ps. —       Ps. 1,622,166  

Equity instruments

   541,262     —       —       541,262  

Debt instruments

   2,155,001     —       —       2,155,001  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 4,318,429     Ps. —       Ps. —       Ps. 4,318,429  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2012 
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Total 

Asset Category:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 3,017,245     Ps. —       Ps. —       Ps. 3,017,245  

Equity instruments

   410,357     —       —       410,357  

Debt instruments

   1,621,623     —       —       1,621,623  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 5,049,225     Ps. —       Ps. —       Ps. 5,049,225  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the principal actuarial assumptions used in Note 19, duringdetermining the defined benefit obligation for the plans are as follows:

   As of December 31, 
       2013          2012     

Rate of increase in salaries

   5.10  5.10

Rate of increase in pensions

   4.60  4.60

Rate of increase in medical services

   7.65  6.79

Inflation assumption

   4.00  4.00

Discount and expected return on plan assets rate

   8.45  6.90

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The discount rate was determined based on the performance of government bonds at the reporting date and considering the average duration of the defined benefit obligation.

Other long-term benefits

PEMEX has established other long-term benefit plans for its employees, to which employees do not contribute, which correspond to the same seniority premiums payable for disability. Benefits under these plans are based on an employee’s salary and years of service completed at separation. Obligations and costs of such plans are recorded in accordance with actuarial valuations performed by independent actuaries. The regulatory framework does not set forth any minimum funding requirements.

During the year under review there were no changes to plan benefits, nor was any reduction events and early extinguishment of employee benefit obligations.

The amounts recognized for these obligations in the statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

Changes in the Liability for Defined Benefits

   2013  2012 

Liabilities Defined benefit at the beginning of year

   Ps. 17,945,114    Ps. 12,824,520  

Charge to income for the year

   2,658,122    2,086,252  

Actuarial (gains) losses recognized in income

   (7,434,615  3,034,342  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities Defined benefit at the end of year

   Ps. 13,168,621    Ps. 17,945,114  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The principal actuarial assumptions used in determining the defined benefit obligation for the plans are as follows:

   December 31, 
     2013    2012 

Rate of increase in salaries

   5.10  5.10

Inflation assumption

   4.00  4.00

Discount and expected return on plan assets rate

   8.45  6.90

The discount rate was determined based on the performance of government bonds at the reporting date and considering the average duration of the defined benefit obligation.

NOTE 15—PROVISIONS FOR SUNDRY CREDITORS:

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the provisions for sundry creditors and others is as follows:

   December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Provision for plugging of wells (Note10(c))

   Ps. 46,118,080     Ps. 48,153,060  

Provision for trails in process (Note 23)

   17,624,737     9,977,366  

Provision for environmental costs (Note 23)

   5,466,581     5,672,368  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps. 69,209,398     Ps. 63,802,794  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The following tables show the allowance account for plugging of wells, trials in progress and environmental costs:

   Plugging of wells 
   December 31, 
   2013  2012 

Balance at the beginning of the period

  Ps. 48,153,060   Ps. 42,507,002  

Additions capitalized in fixed assets

   3,518,799    2,547,962  

Discount rate against income

   (5,240,305  3,552,924  

Deductions

   (313,474  (454,828
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at the end of the period

  Ps. 46,118,080   Ps. 48,153,060  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Trials in progress 
   December 31, 
   2013  2012 

Balance at the beginning of the period

  Ps.9,977,366   Ps.8,421,697  

Additions against income

   8,722,029    2,452,104  

Discount rate against income

   (324,607  (724,716

Deductions

   (750,051  (171,719
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at the end of the period

  Ps. 17,624,737   Ps.9,977,366  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Environmental costs 
   December 31, 
   2013  2012 

Balance at the beginning of the period

  Ps.5,672,368   Ps.5,527,919  

Additions against income

   534,574    1,489,955  

Discount rate against income

   (208,307  (971,469

Deductions

   (532,054  (374,037
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at the end of the period

  Ps.5,466,581   Ps.5,672,368  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Provision for plugging of wells

PEMEX records a provision at present value for the future plugging cost of an oil production facility or pipeline at the time that it is built.

The plugging provision represents the present value of plugging costs related to oil and gas properties. These provisions have been created based on internal estimates of PEMEX. PEMEX has made certain assumptions based on the current economic environment that PEMEX believes provide a reasonable basis on which to estimate the future liability. These estimates are reviewed regularly to take into account any material changes in the assumptions. However, actual plugging costs in the long run will depend on future market prices for the necessary plugging work, which reflect market conditions at the time the work is being performed.

Moreover, the time of plugging depends on when the fields cease to have economically viable production rates, which, in turn, depends on the inherently uncertain future prices of oil and gas.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

NOTE 16—DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW:

The following items represent non-cash transactions and are presented for disclosure purposes:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013   2012  2011 

Investments in equity instruments

  Ps.4,453,495    Ps.(10,125,874 Ps.13,872,160  

Employee benefits equity effect

   247,376,029     (364,878,859  (14,890,060

Net cost of the year for employee benefits

   115,339,689     96,602,337    84,095,152  

Financed Public Works Contracts

   3,042,876     7,523,603    9,606,162  

Cumulative currency translation effect

   5,127,480     2,685,060    4,455,677  

Accrued interest

   817,261     389,773    1,218,222  

NOTE 17—INCOME TAXES AND FEDERAL DUTIES:

On December 21, 2005, the Mexican Congress approved a new fiscal regime for Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities, which was enactedpublished in the Official Gazette of the Federation, effective January 1, 2006. Under this fiscal regime, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s contribution scheme continues to be governed by theLey Federal de Derechos (Federal Duties Law), while the fiscal regime for PEMEX (other than Pemex-Exploration and Production) is determined by theLey de Ingresos de la Federación (Federal Revenue Law).

This regime was modified in each of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. In addition, new modifications entered into effect on January 1, 2013, including the following:

i.The tax regime applicable tocampos marginales (marginal fields) was modified.

iii.The difference between the annual weighted average Mexican crude oil price and the budgeted crude oil price as provided by the Federal Revenue Law was U.S. $86.00 during 2013 and U.S. $85.00 during 2012.

The fiscal regime for PEMEX for 2013 contemplates the following duties:

(a)DOSH

During both 2013 and 2012, the applicable rate of this duty was 71.5%. The computation of this duty is based on the value of the extracted total production of crude oil and natural gas during the year, minus certain permitted deductions established in the Federal Duties Law (including certain investments, costs, expenses and duties).

During 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production made daily, weekly and monthly advance payments in the amounts of Ps. 231,601,625, Ps. 231,601,760 and Ps. 254,070,440, respectively, and a pending payment of Ps. 69,927, totaling Ps. 717,343,752, which was credited to the annual payment of the DOSH. During 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production made daily, weekly and monthly advance payments in the amounts of Ps. 233,925,606, Ps. 233,925,517 and Ps. 278,417,852, respectively, totaling Ps. 747,623,002, which was credited towards the annual payment of the DOSH.

In computing this duty, deductions derived from the residual value of investments made before the current fiscal regime took effect may be applied as a deferred deduction, referred to as a “temporary difference”, in accordance with IAS 12, “Income Taxes” (“IAS 12”). These deductions may be made in a maximum remaining

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

period of ten years, the effect of which, if applied, can have a favorable effect in an amount up to approximately Ps. 302,763,680, depending on certain conditions established in the Federal Duties Law. To date, PEMEX has not recognized such effect from these deferred deductions because they are considered unlikely to materialize. These deductions will expire in 2017.

(b)Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund

Pemex-Exploration and Production must pay this duty when, during the applicable year, the weighted average Mexican crude oil export price exceeds U.S. $22.00. The applicable rate varies between 1% and 10%, depending on the weighted average price of crude oil exports, with the maximum rate of 10% applying when the price exceeds U.S. $31.00 per barrel. Collections of this duty are deposited in theFondo de Estabilización de Ingresos Petroleros (Oil Revenues Stabilization Fund).

(c)Derecho Extraordinario sobre la Exportación de Petróleo Crudo (Extraordinary Duty on Crude Oil Exports)

This duty is calculated by applying a rate of 13.1% to the value resulting from multiplication of (i) the difference between the annual weighted average Mexican crude oil export price and the budgeted crude oil price as provided for in the Federal Revenue Law (U.S. $86.00 during 2013 and U.S. $85.00 during 2012), by (ii) the annual export volume. The duty actually paid may be credited against the Hydrocarbons Duty for the Stabilization Fund. Collections of this duty are directed to the Federative Entities through the Stabilization Fund for the Income of Federative Entities.

(d)Derecho para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica en Materia de Energía (Duty for Scientific and Technological Research on Energy)

During both 2013 and 2012, this duty was applied at a rate of 0.65% to the value of the extracted production of crude oil and natural gas for the year. The proceeds of this tax are allocated to the following funds:

Fondo Sectorial CONACYT (CONACYT Sector Fund) of theConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (National Council of Science and Technology, or “CONACYT”) of the Ministry of Energy;

Fondo CONACYT (CONACYT Fund) of the Ministry of Energy;

Fondo de Investigación Científica y Desarrollo Tecnológico del Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo(Scientific Research and Technological Development Fund of the Mexican Petroleum Institute); and

CONACYT Sector Fund of the Ministry of Energy.

(e)Derecho para la Fiscalización Petrolera (Duty for Oil Monitoring)

This duty was applied at a rate of 0.003% to the value of extracted production of crude oil and natural gas for the year. The revenues from this tax are earmarked for theAuditoria Superior de la Federación (Supreme Federal Audit Office).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(f)Extraction of Hydrocarbons Duty

In 2013 this duty was applied at a 15% rate to the value of the crude oil and natural gas extracted from the following fields:

i.Fields in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec as a whole.

ii.Fields in the Paleocanal de Chicontepec that have been segregated under the Federal Duties Law.

Since October 2011, the NHC segregated 29 of the fields in Chicontepec, pursuant to the authorization of the SHCP.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Remolino field was classified as a marginal field, and is therefore no longer a segregated field in Chicontepec.

iii.The deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico (during 2013, no crude oil or natural gas was produced from such fields).

iv.Marginal fields, with respect to the value of the production above a certain annual base production threshold. The base production from these fields is subject to the general regime pursuant to Articles 254 to 257 of the Federal Duties Law. Beginning in January 2012, the SHCP authorized the inclusion of an additional 14 fields to the marginal fields inventory.

In each case, certain deductions are subtracted from the amount owed. Collections of this duty are deposited in the Oil Revenues Stabilization Fund.

(g)Special Hydrocarbons Duty

During 2013, this duty was applied at a rate of 30% to the difference between the annual value of the crude oil and natural gas extracted from the fields covered in Note 17(f) above, and certain permitted deductions (including specific investments, certain expenses and costs, among others).

Production above a threshold of 240 million barrels of crude oil equivalent is taxed at a rate of 36% of the value that becameexceeds this threshold.

The permitted deductions for certain costs, expenses and investments may not exceed 60% of the value of the crude oil and natural gas extracted annually from these fields or U.S. $32.50. This amount is updated annually using the U.S. producer price index. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the updated amounts were U.S. $36.77 and U.S. $36.46, respectively.

Fields referred to this law are those set forth in Sections (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of subsection (f) of this Note.

(h)Additional Duty on Hydrocarbons

This duty is applied when the accumulated annual average value of barrels of oil equivalent extracted is greater than U.S. $60.00. The accumulated annual average value of barrels of oil equivalent extracted in 2013 and 2012, respectively, were U.S. $67.88 and U.S. $67.31. Each year, the threshold price at which the duty takes effect is adjusted to take account of inflation, as measured by the change in the U.S. producer price index.

This duty shall be calculated by applying a rate of 52% to the value resulting from multiplication of (i) the difference between the accumulated annual average value of barrels of oil equivalent extracted in the field in question and U.S. $60.00, by (ii) the volume of oil equivalent extracted in the field in question for the year.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Fields referred to this law are those set forth in Sections (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of subsection (f) of this Note.

(i)Derecho para Regular y Supervisar la Exploración y Explotación de Hidrocarburos (Duty to Regulate and Supervise the Exploration and Exploitation of Hydrocarbons)

This duty applies a fee of 0.03% on the annual value of crude oil and natural gas extracted during the year. The fee is assessed on an annual basis, but is to be paid in advance monthly installments within seven business days following the end of each month. Collections of this duty are directed to the budget of the NHC. The Hydrocarbons Exploration Tax for 2013 will be declared through a tax return filed with the Federal Treasury no later than the last business day of March 2014, and the monthly advance payments made during the fiscal year will be credited to that amount.

(j)IEPS Tax

In accordance with current regulations, PEMEX is subject to the IEPS Tax, which applies to the domestic sales of gasoline and diesel. The IEPS Tax is paid to the SHCP monthly, after deducting daily advance payments made in accordance with applicable rules. The effective rate of this tax depends on factors such as the type of product, reference price, the region where the product is sold, additional freight costs and applicable commissions.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Federal Revenues Law was amended, allowing PEMEX to credit the negative IEPS Tax, which is generated when the prices at which PEMEX is required to sell gasoline and diesel in the domestic market are lower than international market prices, against other taxes and payments to which PEMEX is also subject. In 2013 and 2012, increases in international prices of hydrocarbons and petroleum products caused the rate of the IEPS Tax to be negative. As a result of this credit, in 2013, 2012 and 2011 PEMEX recognized revenues of approximately Ps. 94,466,039, Ps. 214,102,498 and Ps. 178,869,172, respectively.

(k)IRP

This tax is applicable to Petróleos Mexicanos and itsthe Subsidiary Entities effective January 1, 2006. Dueother than Pemex-Exploration and Production, and is calculated by applying a 30% rate to the related changeexcess of total revenues minus authorized deductions, pursuant to the specific rules provided by the SHCP in tax regime,accordance with the Federal Income Law.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, PEMEX generated an IRP as follows:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

Current IRP

  Ps. 4,705,201   Ps. 3,176,510   Ps.555,335  

Deferred IRP

   (917,658  (783,591  (1,232,725
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total IRP

  Ps. 3,787,543   Ps. 2,392,919   Ps.(677,390
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

During 2013 Petróleos Mexicanos and itsthe Subsidiary Entities, began recognizingother than Pemex-Exploration and Production, made aggregate daily and weekly payments of Ps. 750,440 and Ps. 750,464, respectively, as determined by the SHCP, for an overall total of Ps. 1,500,904 credited to the annual payment of the IRP. During 2012, the aggregate daily and weekly payments determined by the SHCP were Ps. 758,718 and Ps. 758,854, respectively, for an overall total of Ps. 1,517,572 credited to the annual payment.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The 2013 IRP will be declared through a tax return filed with the Federal Treasury no later than the last business day of March 2014, and the daily and weekly advance payments made during the fiscal year will be credited against that amount.

Petróleos Mexicanos must comply for its own account, and for the account of the Subsidiary Entities, with all obligations under the Federal Income Law and other fiscal laws, except as explicitly provided for in relation to the making of daily and weekly payments. As such, Petróleos Mexicanos is solely responsible for the payment of contributions and duties owed by the Subsidiary Entities to the Mexican Government.

The principal factors generating the deferred IRP are the following:

   As of December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Deferred IRP asset:

    

Advances from customers

  Ps.50,895     Ps. 49,907  

Provision for contingencies and others(1)

   103,282     348,481  

Environmental reserve

   178,830     223,204  

Valuation of accounts receivable

   67,317     —    

Valuation of inventories

   96,852     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred IRP assets

   497,176     621,592  

Valuation allowance

   (263,304)     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred IRP asset, net

   233,872     621,592  

Deferred IRP liability:

    

Properties, plant and equipment

   (23,903,298)     (25,196,617)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred IRP liability, net

   (23,903,298)     (25,196,617)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net long-term deferred IRP liability

  Ps. (23,669,426)     Ps. (24,575,025
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Includes deferred IRP from Petróleos Mexicanos and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

The expense (benefit) attributable to the profit (loss) from continuing operations before IRP was different from what would result from applying the rate of 30% to profit, as a result of the items listed below:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

Expected IRP expense (benefit)

  Ps.54,674,666   Ps.5,945,580   Ps.2,126,212  

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

    

Tax effect of inflation, net

   2,736,501    (835,493  (1,416,820

Difference between accounting and tax depreciation

   (1,360,929  (813,093  (1,214,613

Non-taxable loss sharing in subsidiaries, associates and others

   (52,276,542  (3,070,490  (779,667

Non-deductible expenses

   130,377    809,303    681,254  

Other, net

   (116,530  357,112    (73,756
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

IRP expense

  Ps.3,787,543   Ps.2,392,919   Ps.(677,390)  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(l)Value Added Tax (“VAT”)

For VAT purposes, final monthly payments are determined based on PEMEX’s cash flow, in accordance with the provisions of the Value Added Tax Law, which is applicable to payers of this tax.

(m)Income Tax

Certain of the Subsidiary Companies are subject to the Income Tax Law and to the IETU, and are therefore required to pay the greater of their IETU or income tax liability.

Accounting income differs from taxable income primarily due to the effects of inflation and differences between depreciation and other non-deductible expenses.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Subsidiary Companies incurred the following income tax expense (benefit):

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013  2012   2011 

Current income tax

  Ps. 4,641,531   Ps. 1,664,257    Ps. 3,281,445  

Deferred income tax

   (889,301  190,852     356,589  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Ps. 3,752,230   Ps. 1,855,109    Ps. 3,638,034  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The principal factors generating the deferred income taxes during 2005. The U.S. GAAP equity adjustment representstax are the cumulative impact of deferredfollowing:

   As of December 31, 
   2013  2012 

Deferred income tax asset:

   

Provisions

  Ps.732,499   Ps.47,081  

Employee benefits

   183,009    295,449  

Advance payments from clients

   127,245    99,639  

Losses from prior years

   20,524    822,924  

Non-recoverable accounts

   24,666    24,541  

Derivative financial instruments

   102,131    24,771  

Tax loss carryforwards(1)

   1,069,216    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred income tax asset

   2,259,290    1,314,405  

Deferred income tax liability:

   

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

   (2,077,648  (2,167,435

Other

   (1,078,752  (773,863
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred income tax liability

   (3,156,400  (2,941,298
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net long-term deferred income tax liability

  Ps.(897,110 Ps. (1,626,893)  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Matures in 2023.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Expense (benefit) attributable to the profit (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes relatingwas different from what would result from applying the rate of 30% to profit, as a result of the items listed below:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

Expected income tax expense

  Ps.4,445,349   Ps.1,422,051   Ps.3,319,998  

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

    

Tax effect of inflation, net

   (106,974  (30,714  24,352  

Difference between accounting and tax depreciation

   (34,860  278,347    (4,569

Non-deductible expenses

   72,841    2,107    153,856  

Others, net(1)

   (624,126  183,318    144,397  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense

  Ps.3,752,230   Ps.1,855,109   Ps.3,638,034  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The deferred tax effect of gains and losses from PMI CIM’s performance is presented in profit (loss) comprehensive income in the amount of Ps. 159,518, Ps. 267,215 and Ps. 29,746 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

NOTE 18—EQUITY (DEFICIT):

(a)Permanent equity

On December 31, 1990, certain debt owed by Petróleos Mexicanos to the other U.S. GAAP adjustments applicableMexican Government was capitalized as equity. This capitalization amounted to Ps. 22,334,195 in nominal terms (U.S. $7,577,000) and was authorized by the Board. In December 1997, the Board and the Mexican Government agreed to a reduction in equity in respect of the Certificates of Contribution “A” in exchange for a payment in cash to the Mexican Government of Ps. 12,118,050 (U.S. $1,500,000). As of December 31, 2012, the value of the Certificates of Contribution “A” was Ps. 49,604,835 (historical value of Ps. 10,216,145 plus (a) an adjustment of Ps. 6,318 and (b) an inflation restatement increase of Ps. 39,382,372). On December 24, 2013, the Mexican Government made an equity contribution of Ps. 65,000,000 to Petróleos Mexicanos in the form of Certificates of Contribution “A.”

The capitalization agreement between PEMEX and its Subsidiary Entities.the Mexican Government states that the Certificates of Contribution “A” constitute permanent capital.

Permanent equity is as follows:

 

(i)
Amount

Certificates of Contribution “A”

Ps.10,222,463

Inflation restatement increase through December 31, 2007

39,382,372

Certificates of Contribution “A” as of December 31, 2012

49,604,835

Increase in Certificates of Contribution “A”

65,000,000

Certificates of Contribution “A” as of December 31, 2013

Ps. 114,604,835

(b)Mexican Government contributions

On December 16, 2013, the Mexican Government withdrew Ps. 65,000,000 from PEMEX’s equity. On December 19, 2013, the Board acknowledged the equity withdrawal made by the Mexican Government. This equity withdrawal was recognized as a decrease in the Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos line item in PEMEX’s consolidated statements of changes in equity (deficit).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

In December 2013, the Mexican Government contributed Ps. 1,583,100 to theFondo de Estabilización para la Inversión en Infraestructura de Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX Infrastructure Investment Stabilization Fund, or “FEIIP”). This contribution was recorded in the Mexican Government contributions to Petróleos Mexicanos line item in PEMEX’s consolidated statements of changes in equity (deficit) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

In 2013, the Mexican Government authorized a contribution of Ps. 2,000,000 to theFondo de Estabilización de los Ingresos Petroleros (Oil Revenues Stabilization Fund, or “FEIPEMEX”). This amount was not paid to FEIPEMEX until January 27, 2014, and was therefore recognized as uncalled capital in PEMEX’s consolidated statements of changes in equity (deficit) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

(c)Legal reserve

Under Mexican law, each of the Subsidiary Companies is required to allocate a certain percentage of its net income to a legal reserve fund until the fund reaches an amount equal to a certain percentage of each Subsidiary Company’s capital stock. In 2013, the legal reserve fund increased by Ps. 24,370 due to the consolidation of new companies.

(d)Accumulated losses

PEMEX has recorded negative earnings in the past several years. However, under theLey de Concursos Mercantiles (Commercial Bankruptcy Law of Mexico) decentralized public entities such as Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities cannot be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. Furthermore, the financing agreements to which PEMEX is a party do not provide for financial covenants that would be breached or events of default that would be triggered as a consequence of negative equity. The Mexican Government has focused its recent efforts on consolidating PEMEX’s institutional strategy, including the approval of amendments to the Mexican Constitution published as the Energy Reform Decree on December 20, 2013, which permit it greater autonomy in decision making and enhanced operational viability (see Note 1).

(e)Non-controlling interest

Effective July 1, 2005, PEMEX entered into an option agreement with BNP Paribas Private Bank and Trust Cayman Limited to acquire 100% of the shares of Pemex Finance, Ltd. (“Pemex Finance”). As a result, since 2005, the financial results of Pemex Finance, have beenLtd. are included in these consolidated into the financial statements of PEMEX for Mexican FRS purposes. Historically,PEMEX. Under IFRS, variations in income and equity from Pemex Finance, has been consolidatedLtd. are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated U.S. GAAP information included herein for all periods presented. However, under U.S. GAAP,statements of changes in equity (deficit) as “non-controlling interest”, and as net income and retained earnings from Pemex Finance are reclassified ascomprehensive income for the period, attributable to non-controlling interest, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, due to the fact that PEMEX does not currently own any of the shares of Pemex Finance. The U.S. GAAP adjustment related to Pemex Finance, represents the reclassificationLtd.

As of net incomeDecember 31, 2013 and equity recognized under Mexican FRS to2012, non-controlling interest.

In 2011, 2010 and 2009, net income from Pemex Finance totaledinterest represented Ps. 210,166, Ps. 217,437503,882 and Ps. 160,285, respectively.

II.Additional disclosure requirements:

(a)IEPS Tax

Under Mexican FRS, the IEPS Tax, when positive, is reflected as part698,453, respectively, of net domestic sales when charged to customers and the amounts payable to the Mexican Government are then deducted from income before hydrocarbon extraction duties and other, special taxes on production and services, and cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standards. The IEPS Tax rate has been negative since 2005.

Under U.S. GAAP, this tax would have no net effect on revenues nor would it be deducted from income before taxes and duties, net of IEPS tax, as both the amount charged to customers and the amount accrued as payable to the tax authorities would be excluded from revenues (i.e., there is no gross-up).

(b)Environmental, dismantlement and abandonment liabilities

PEMEX establishes accruals for its environmental liabilities using estimates based on costs of similar remediation works most recently contracted and in progress at that time.

PEMEX has internal guidelines for estimating and recording environmental liabilities, theGuía para la Determinación de las Provisiones y Revelaciones de Carácter Ambiental(Guidelines for the Determination of Environmental Liabilities and their Disclosure). These guidelines’ purpose is to standardize and improve PEMEX’s internal procedures for identifying necessary remediation works and estimating and monitoring environmental liabilities.equity (deficit).

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

These guidelines establish that an environmental liability exists when:NOTE 19—OTHER REVENUES AND EXPENSES-NET:

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, other revenues and expenses—net was as follows:

 

(i)as a result of the activities of PEMEX, an affected area is identified in a particular site, and PEMEX undertakes a formal commitment to correct the environmental damage, in accordance with the criteria, guidelines, standards and legal framework in effect; and
   December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

Revenues:

    

Negative IEPS

  Ps.94,466,039   Ps. 214,102,498   Ps. 178,869,172  

Other

   8,184,140    6,284,045    15,744,402  

Bidding terms, sanctions, penalties and other

   2,159,847    2,052,818    204,605  

Reversal of impairment of properties, plant and equipment

   1,650,642    —      11,689,832  

Franchise fees

   999,491    930,140    910,067  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other revenues

   107,460,159    223,369,501    207,418,078  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expenses:

    

Impairment of properties plant and equipment

   (25,608,835  —      (6,855,535

Other

   (15,285,119  (13,190,572  (10,021,932

Claims

   (2,039,355  (1,159,966  (1,420,750

Total other expenses

   (42,933,309  (14,350,538  (18,298,217
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other revenues and expenses—net

  Ps.64,526,850   Ps. 209,018,963   Ps. 189,119,861  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 20—FINANCING INCOME AND COST:

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the financing income and cost were as follows:

 

(ii)a reasonable estimate of the costs of remediation or cleanup of the identified affected area has been made, including the costs of the assessment studies.
   December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

Derivative financial instruments income

  Ps.15,791,510   Ps.20,683,047   Ps.26,386,424  

Interest income

   8,735,699    2,531,791    4,197,810  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing income

  Ps.24,527,209   Ps.23,214,838   Ps.30,584,234  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest expense

   (39,586,484  (46,010,543  (35,153,558

Derivative financial instruments cost

   (14,480,537  (26,940,695  (28,082,649
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing cost

  Ps. (54,067,021 Ps. (72,951,238 Ps. (63,236,207
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

As stated above, in accordance with pastNOTE 21—RELATED PARTIES:

All significant intercompany balances and present internal guidelines, PEMEX conducts site-by-site studies to identify environmental liabilities and develop a reasonable estimate of such liabilities. These guidelines consider many factors, but are tailored to specific Mexican requirements. Each contaminated site must be characterized, quantified and assessed through a specific study. The contamination of the affected sites may extend to the soil, subsoil and bodies of water, including water deposits, lagoons, swamps and other areas. These sites may be located inside PEMEX’s facilities, in surrounding areas, in abandoned areas where PEMEX had activitytransactions have been eliminated in the past or along pipelines.

Once the corresponding contaminated site has been identifiedconsolidation of PEMEX’s financial statements. Balances and evaluated, expenses for the cleanuptransactions with related parties are mainly due to: (i) sale and purchase of (i) hydrocarbon seepage and other spills that may cause pollution and that cannot be corrected in a short timeframe,products, (ii) water depositsadministrative services rendered and (iii) the concentrationfinancial loans among related parties. The terms and conditions of hazardous residuals will be included as part of the accrued liability for remediation or restoration of affected areas. Estimates are kept current based on the besttransactions with related parties were no more favorable than those available information.

Based on reports from field managers and other available information, management prepares reports for identified affected areas on a periodic basis. When the contamination relates to a new incident, PEMEX informs PROFEPA and responds immediately to eliminate the cause of the incident or to minimize its impact. Subsequently, PEMEX and PROFEPA jointly determine whether the contamination has been eliminated or if additional actions are necessary for the remediation of the site.

PEMEX believes its environmental liabilities are probable when its initial studies reveal the existence of contamination in the inspected areas at levels above those permitted by Mexican law, indicating that PEMEX will have to perform remediation works necessary to bring the site into compliance. PEMEX believes the liability is reasonably estimable when (i) an assessment of the size of the affected area has been made, (ii) it has compared the affected area to other affected areas identifiedparties on an arm’s length basis.

Under theLey Federal de Responsabilidades Administrativas de los Servidores Públicos (Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Officials), which applies to PEMEX’s directors and addressed in the past and (iii) based on PEMEX’s experience with current or recent activities on similar sites, PEMEX can assess the estimated remediation costs in order to be able to calculate the corresponding environmental liability. Thus, PEMEX accrues for these environmental liabilities when it identifies affected areas with contamination levels above those permitted by Mexican law and PEMEX is able to make a reasonable estimate of the size of the affected area and the remediation cost. In addition, PEMEX periodically revises its estimates of environmental liabilities as it obtains new information during the course of the remediation works, in order to ensure that its estimates are based on the most accurate and updated information.

PROFEPA administers the Mexican environmental regulatory rubric and establishes acceptable standards of environmental remediation. Although PROFEPA has the authority to review and inspect remediation works performed by PEMEX and compliance with permitted contamination levels established by laws and regulations, it does not determine PEMEX’s environmental liabilities. PEMEX maintains proper records of all of the studies, estimations, performed works and any other information that PROFEPA may request from time to time.its

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

During 2011, 2010employees, PEMEX’s directors and 2009,employees are obligated to “recuse themselves from intervening in any way in the attention to, processing or resolution of matters in which they might have personal, family or business interest, including those where some benefit can result for themselves, their spouse, blood or affinity relatives up to the fourth degree, or civil relatives, or for third parties with which they have professional, labor or business relations, or for partners or partnerships where the public officials or the persons referred above are or have been members thereof.”

Related parties include individuals and companies that do not form part of PEMEX, spent Ps. 10,064,000, Ps. 10,087,000but that could take advantage of being in a privileged position as a result of their relation with PEMEX. Also included are situations in which PEMEX could take advantage of a special relationship in order to benefit its financial position or results of operations.

Prior to his appointment as Secretary of Energy, Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos since December 2012, as well as certain members of his family, held ownership interests in companies that have entered into agreements with Pemex-Refining for the sale and Ps. 5,643,069, respectively, on various environmental projects and related expenditures. The most significant projects have included the modernizationpurchase of installations, the implementation of systems and mechanisms to monitor and control atmospheric pollution, the acquisition of equipment to clean hydrocarbon spills, the expansion of aquatic effluent systems, the restoration and reforestation of affected areas, environmental investigative studies and the conducting of environmental audits. In addition, PEMEX has engaged in extensive research and development efforts to increase its capacity to produce unleaded gasoline and dieselother products by certain retail service stations and fuel oil with lower sulfur content at its refineries in Mexico.

PEMEX’s management believes that its operations are in substantial compliance witha wholesale distributor, as well as the General Law on Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection (the “Environmental Law”), as such law has been historically interpreted and enforced.

Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations that have no future economic benefit are expensed. Liabilities for expendituresperformance of a non-capital nature are recorded on a discounted basis when (a) expenses include payments during periods longer than one year, (b) environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable and (c)other related activities. As of the costs can be reasonably estimated.

PEMEX obtains insurance policies to cover the costdate of certain environmental contingencies. The liability accruals are not reflected net of any amounts forthcoming under such policies. Environmental liabilities accrued in thethese consolidated financial statements, for both Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP purposes, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, were divided among the operating unitstheir ownership interests are as follows:

 

   2011   2010 

Pemex-Exploration and Production

  Ps.    1,437,426    Ps.    1,906,970  

Pemex-Refining

   4,065,740     3,365,870  

Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals

   19,523     19,523  

Pemex-Petrochemicals

   5,230     5,570  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total environmental liability accrual

  Ps.5,527,919    Ps.5,297,933  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(c)Dismantlement and abandonment costs

Company

Name

Ownership
Share

Servicio Cozumel, S.A. de C.V. (which operates a retail service station).

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell60
Mr. Pedro Oscar Joaquín Delbouis
(son of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)
20
Mr. Nassim Joaquín Delbouis
(son of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)
20

Planta de Combustible Cozumel, S.A. de C.V. (which operates as a wholesale distributor).

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell40
Mr. Fausto Nassim Joaquín Ibarra
(father of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)
60

Gasolinera y Servicios Juárez, S.A. de C.V. (which operates a retail service station).

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell40
Mr. Fausto Nassim Joaquín Ibarra40
Mr. Ignacio Nassim Ruiz Joaquín
(nephew of Mr. Joaquín Coldwell)
20

Combustibles Caleta, S.A. de C.V. (which operates a retail service station).

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell20
Mr. Pedro Oscar Joaquín Delbouis20
Mr. Nassim Joaquín Delbouis20
Mr. Fausto Nassim Joaquín Ibarra20
Mr. Ignacio Nassim Ruiz Joaquín20

Combustibles San Miguel, S.A. de C.V. (which operates a retail service station).

Mr. Pedro Joaquín Coldwell25
Mr. Pedro Oscar Joaquín Delbouis25
Mr. Nassim Joaquín Delbouis25
Mr. Ignacio Nassim Ruiz Joaquín25

Under current Mexican law, PEMEX’s legal obligation related to dismantlement and abandonment activities is governed by the following two federal laws: the Petroleum Works Law and the Environmental Law described in this Note. Although PEMEX is subject to other laws and regulations established at a local level in areas where PEMEX undertakes petroleum extraction activities, these local laws and regulations do not contain any specific guidance on abandonment, restoration and removal of oil and gas facilities, or otherwise impose a higher standard on PEMEX in this regard. Mexico is not a party to any international treaty or convention that would affect PEMEX’s understanding of its obligation with regard to dismantlement and abandonment activities. Thus, the only relevant body of law for PEMEX as to abandonment and removal of facilities related to oil and gas producing activities is Mexican federal law.

The Petroleum Works Law provides that wells must be plugged, or in certain cases, capped, to ensure the maintenance of sanitary and safe conditions and to prevent the seepage of hydrocarbons to the surface. The Petroleum Works Law requires that PEMEX plug a well when it turns out to be dry, is invaded with salt water or

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

is abandoned dueThe rights of these companies to operate retail service stations and distribute gasoline and other products on a mechanical accident,wholesale basis in Mexico are dependent on these agreements, the expiration or once a well’s production has been depleted such that abandonment is necessary due to economic unfeasibilitynon-renewal of production. All activities required for plugging a wellwhich may adversely affect their business. These agreements are undertaken with the purpose of isolating, in a definitive and convenient manner, the cross-formations in the perforation that contain oil, gas or water in order to ensure that hydrocarbons do not seep to the surface.

PEMEX must obtain authorization from the Ministry of Energy before performing any plugging activities. The Petroleum Works Law also provides that the Ministry of Energy may authorize temporary plugging of exploratory wells where production of hydrocarbons is commercially feasible, but for which there are no adequate means of exploitation.

PEMEX monitors and reviews its own internal estimates of costs to undertake dismantlement and abandonment at levels consistent with Mexican legal requirements and guidelines for oil and gas industry extraction activities. Estimates as to aggregate costs include PEMEX’s operational specifics such as the number of onshore and offshore wells, depth of wells, the varying nature of offshore platforms, expected production lives, current expectations as to when the costs will be incurred based on present production ratesPEMEX’s standard forms of agreements and other operational specifics. The actual costs incurred incontain the dismantlementstandard terms and retirementconditions applicable to all of wells are considered where practicable, as described above. The average cost for pluggingPemex-Refining’s retail service stations and dismantlement varies from producing region to producing region and from platform to platform. For the offshore regions, to the extent that actual costs are not available due to limited plugging and dismantlement activity historically, PEMEX relies on estimates based on services costs. The estimated costs are both peso- and U.S. dollar-denominated.wholesale distributors.

 

(d)(a)Employee benefitsCompensation of Directors and Officers

DisclosuresFor the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the aggregate compensation of classificationsexecutive officers of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities paid or accrued in that year for services in all capacities was approximately Ps. 174,800, Ps. 167,800 and Ps. 154,400, respectively. Except in the case of the professional members, members of the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities do not receive compensation for their services.

The compensation paid or accrued during 2013, 2012 and 2011 to the professional members of the Boards of Directors of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Subsidiary Entities was approximately Ps. 13,600, Ps. 13,600 and Ps. 13,700, respectively.

(b)Salary Advances

As an employee benefits determinedbenefit, PEMEX offers salary advances to all of its eligible Petroleum Workers’ Union and non-union workers, including executive officers, pursuant to the programs set forth in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been presented, for purposesthe collective bargaining agreement and in theReglamento de Trabajo del Personal de Confianza de Petróleos Mexicanos y Organismos Subsidiarios (Employment Regulation of comparison,White Collar Employees of Petróleos Mexicanos and Subsidiary Entities), respectively. The salary advances, which are non-interest bearing, are offered to each eligible employee in an amount up to a format consistent with Mexican FRS requirements.maximum of four months’ salary and are repaid through salary deductions in equal installments over a period of either one or two years, as elected by the employee. Most employees take advantage of this benefit. The amount of salary advances outstanding to executive officers at December 31, 2013 was Ps. 23,016 and at December 31, 2012 was Ps. 21,785. As of March 31, 2014, the aggregate amount of salary advances outstanding to PEMEX’s executive officers was Ps. 21,605.

NOTE 22—COMMITMENTS:

(a)PMI CIM has entered into several contracts for the sale of crude oil on the international market to foreign companies. The terms and conditions of these contracts are specific to each client, and their durations may be indefinite (evergreen contracts) or they may contain a minimum obligatory period (long-term contracts).

(b)PEMEX has entered into a nitrogen supply contract for the pressure maintenance program at the Cantarell complex. During 2007, an additional contract was entered into with the purpose of supplying nitrogen to the Ku-Maloob-Zap complex and extending the original contract until 2027. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the value of the nitrogen to be supplied during the term of the contract was approximately Ps. 9,844,001 and Ps. 11,169,054, respectively. In the event of the annulment of the contract and depending on the circumstances, PEMEX has the right and obligation to acquire the vendor’s nitrogen plant under the terms of the contract.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

The components of termination and retirement benefits and net periodic cost, calculated in accordance with Topic 715,Estimated future payments under this contract for theupcoming fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, using December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively,are as a measurement date, consisted of the following:follows:

 

   Termination
Benefits
2011
  Retirement
Benefits

2011
  Total
Benefits
2011
  Termination
Benefits
2010
  Retirement
Benefits

2010
  Total
Benefits
2010
 

Service cost

  Ps.2,113,204   Ps.13,969,020   Ps.16,082,224   Ps.1,978,162   Ps.13,873,442   Ps.15,851,604  

Interest cost

   1,993,866    63,916,325    65,910,191    2,006,087    69,910,791    71,916,878  

Return on plan assets

       (843,835  (843,835      (906,579  (906,579

Net amortization of gains and losses

   (498,748  3,519,941    3,021,193    (171,264  7,673,904    7,502,640  

Amortization of net transition obligation

   381,379    11,657,479    12,038,858    381,379    11,657,479    12,038,858  

Plan amendments

   21,709    603,826    625,535    21,709    603,826    625,535  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cost under U.S. GAAP

   4,011,410    92,822,756    96,834,166    4,216,073    102,812,863    107,028,936  

Net benefit (cost) under Mexican FRS

   9,015,372    (111,846,576  (102,831,204  8,360,536    (122,635,577  (114,275,041
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjustment to cost (additional benefit) under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.    13,026,782   Ps.    (19,023,820 Ps.    (5,997,038 Ps.  12,576,609   Ps.(19,822,714 Ps.(7,246,105
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2014

  Ps. 1,331,122  

2015

   1,375,412  

2016

   890,967  

2017

   589,436  

2018

   589,659  

More than 5 years

   5,067,405  
  

 

 

 

Total

  Ps. 9,844,001  
  

 

 

 

 

   Termination
Benefits
2009
   Retirement
Benefits
2009
   Total
Benefits
2009
 

Service cost

  Ps.1,268,495    Ps.11,571,995    Ps.12,840,490  

Interest cost

   1,673,169     51,292,054     52,965,223  

Return on plan assets

        (516,283   (516,283

Net amortization of gain and losses

   (174,239   36,135     (138,104

Amortization of net transition obligation

   381,379     11,657,479     12,038,858  

Plan amendments

   21,709     603,826     625,535  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cost under U.S. GAAP

   3,170,513     74,645,206     77,815,719  

Net (cost) under Mexican FRS

   (12,214,637   (93,437,254   (105,651,891
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustment to cost (additional benefit) under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.(9,044,124  Ps.  (18,792,048  Ps.(27,836,172
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
(c)During 2008, PEMEX entered into a nitrogen supply contract for pressure maintenance at the Jujo Tecominoacán complex in the Southern region. The term of this contract runs until 2017. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the value of the nitrogen to be supplied during the term of the contract was approximately Ps. 558,718 and Ps. 617,055, respectively. In the event of early termination of this contract, PEMEX would only be required to pay for services received and for certain unrecoverable expenses of the counterparty under the terms of the contract.

Estimated future payments under this contract for upcoming fiscal years are as follows:

2014

  Ps. 140,012  

2015

   140,012  

2016

   140,142  

2017

   138,552  
  

 

 

 

Total

  Ps. 558,718  
  

 

 

 

(d)As of December 31, 2013, PEMEX had entered into FPWCs by means of which the contractor manages and is responsible for financing performance of the work to be undertaken. Until PEMEX accepts the completed works, it has no payment obligations under the contracts. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the estimated value of these contracts was as follows:

Contract date

  Block  2013   2012 

February 9, 2004

  Olmos  U.S. $296,301    U.S. $297,890  

November 21, 2003

  Cuervito   59,160     45,558  

November 28, 2003

  Misión   435,343     639,002  

November 14, 2003

  Reynosa-Monterrey   12,422     1,966,108  

December 8, 2003

  Fronterizo   34,204     72,948  

March 23, 2005

  Pirineo   254,912     348,582  

April 3, 2007

  Nejo   752,338     919,368  

April 20, 2007

  Monclova   296,452     718,545  

May 12, 2008

  Burgos VII   61,146     171,891  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
    U.S. $2,202,278    U.S. $5,179,892  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

(e)

In 2013 and 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production entered into integrated exploration and production contracts (“Integrated E&P Contracts”) for the development of mature fields in the Altamira, Ébano, Nejo, Pánuco and San Andrés blocks in the Northern region of Mexico and Magallanes, Santuario and Carrizo blocks in the Southern region of Mexico, respectively. Each contract has a term of up to 25 years. Payments

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

to the contractors pursuant to the Integrated E&P Contracts will be made on a per-barrel basis, plus recovery of certain costs, provided that the payments to the contractor may not exceed PEMEX’s cash flow from the particular block subject to each contract. During 2013, PEMEX made payments pursuant to the Integrated E&P Contracts in the Northern region of U.S. $2,060,562 and the Southern region of U.S. $2,255,333. During 2012, PEMEX did not make any payments pursuant to the Integrated E&P contracts.

PEMEX’s termination

(f)In 2012, Pemex-Exploration and Production contracted for the construction of two self-elevating offshore platforms for a total of approximately U.S. $509,116. Pemex-Exploration and Production has made an advance payment of U.S. $42,000 for each platform in order to initiate construction, which is estimated to take two years. The outstanding amount for the platforms will be paid through a financial lease for a period of 10 years, after which Pemex-Exploration and Production may exercise the option to purchase the platforms for a notional amount.

(g)As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, PEMEX had entered into contracts with several contractors for the development of various infrastructure works, for an estimated total amount of Ps. 630,776,122 and Ps. 470,232,689, respectively. Until PEMEX accepts the completed works, it has no payment obligations under the contracts.

NOTE 23—CONTINGENCIES:

In the ordinary course of business, PEMEX is named in a number of lawsuits of various types. PEMEX evaluates the merit of each claim and retirement benefits liability asassesses the likely outcome. PEMEX has not recorded provisions related to ongoing legal proceedings due to the fact that an unfavorable resolution is not expected in such proceedings, with the exception of December 31, 2011 and 2010 under Topic 715,the proceeding disclosed in accordance with FRS D-3, was as follows:Note 5 and described in further detail in this Note.

 

   Termination
Benefits
2011
  Retirement
Benefits
2011
  Total
Benefits
2011
  Termination
Benefits
2010
  Retirement
Benefits
2010
  Total
Benefits
2010
 

Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO)

  Ps.  12,229,334   Ps.  756,619,740   Ps.  768,849,074   Ps.  18,936,746   Ps.  667,941,422   Ps.  686,878,168  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation (PBO)

   14,364,071    834,137,307    848,501,378    23,578,074    763,707,671    787,285,745  

Plan assets at fair value

       (3,644,372  (3,644,372      (3,110,359  (3,110,359
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation (PBO) in excess of plan assets

   14,364,071    830,492,935    844,857,006    23,578,074    760,597,312    784,175,386  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrued liability under U.S. GAAP

   14,364,071    830,492,935    844,857,006    23,578,074    760,597,312    784,175,386  

Accrued (liability) recognized under Mexican FRS

   (14,223,448  (716,793,551  (731,016,999  (23,247,102  (638,117,963  (661,365,065
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP adjustment to employee benefits liability after recognition of Topic 715

   140,623    113,699,384    113,840,007    330,972    122,479,349    122,810,321  

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)

   15,344,049    (158,307,678  (142,963,629  2,119,060    (148,055,965  (145,936,905
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net U.S. GAAP adjustment to (decrease in) employee benefits liability

  Ps.15,484,672   Ps.(44,608,294 Ps.(29,123,622 Ps.2,450,032   Ps.(25,576,616 Ps.(23,126,584
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
(a)PEMEX is subject to the provisions of theLey General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente (General Law on Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection). To comply with this law, environmental audits of PEMEX’s larger operating, storage and transportation facilities have been or are being conducted. Following the completion of such audits, PEMEX has signed various agreements with theProcuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente (Federal Attorney of Environmental Protection, or “PROFEPA”) to implement environmental remediation and improve environmental plans. Such plans contemplate remediation for environmental damages, as well as related investments for the improvement of equipment, maintenance, labor and materials. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the reserve for environmental remediation expenses totaled Ps. 5,466,581 and Ps. 5,672,368, respectively. This reserve is included as part of the reserve for sundry creditors and others as a long-term liability in the statement of financial position.

(b)PEMEX is involved in various civil, tax, criminal, administrative, labor and commercial lawsuits and arbitration proceedings. The results of these proceedings are uncertain as of this date. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, PEMEX had accrued a reserve of Ps. 17,624,737 and Ps. 9,977,366, respectively, for these contingent liabilities. The current status of the principal lawsuits in which PEMEX is involved is as follows:

In September 2001, Conproca, S.A. de C.V. (“CONPROCA”), the construction company performing construction and maintenance services for Pemex-Refining’s Cadereyta refinery, filed a claim for arbitration before the ICA against Pemex-Refining and Petróleos Mexicanos (No. 11760/KGA) related to expenses incurred by CONPROCA for, among other things, additional work performed and value added. On April 30, 2012, the ICA ordered Pemex-Refining and Petróleos Mexicanos to pay U.S. $311,178 and CONPROCA to pay U.S. $29,038. On July 27, 2012, Petróleos Mexicanos and

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Changes in the amounts of net benefit obligation recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss under U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

   Termination
Benefits
2011
  Retirement
Benefits
2011
  Total
Benefits
2011
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year

  Ps.        (2,119,060 Ps.     148,055,965   Ps.       145,936,905  

Total unrecognized losses (gains)(1)

   (13,320,649  26,032,959    12,712,310  

Net amortization of gains and losses

   498,748    (3,519,941  (3,021,193

Amortization of net transition obligation

   (381,379  (11,657,479  (12,038,858

Plan amendments

   (21,709  (603,826  (625,535
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year

  Ps.     (15,344,049 Ps.  158,307,678   Ps.  142,963,629  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)During 2011, the number of active and inactive employees, average years of service, average age and average salary of employees increased, each as compared to 2010. The discount rate decreased from 8.96% to 8.81% as compared to 2010, while the assumed rate of return on plan assets increased (from 8.75% to 8.81%), the inflation rate of the consumer food basket decreased (from 8.28% to 7.50%) and the inflation rate applicable to medical services increased (from 5.93% to 6.36%), each as compared to 2010. In addition, an actuarial gain related to the valuation as of December 31, 2011 of the accrual for the eventual dismissal of employees prior to eligibility for retirement (termination) benefits under the plan was recognized. These changes resulted in a significant increase in actuarial gains and losses in 2011 relative to the number of employees participating in the plan.

   Termination
Benefits
2010
  Retirement
Benefits

2010
  Total
Benefits
2010
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year

  Ps.10,658,756   Ps.345,214,253   Ps.355,873,009  

Total unrecognized losses (gains)(1)

   (12,545,992  (177,223,079  (189,769,071

Net amortization of gains and losses

   171,264    (7,673,904  (7,502,640

Amortization of net transition obligation

   (381,379  (11,657,479  (12,038,858

Plan amendments

   (21,709  (603,826  (625,535
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year

  Ps.(2,119,060 Ps.148,055,965   Ps.145,936,905  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)During 2010, the number of active and inactive employees increased as compared to 2009. In addition, the average years of service, average age and average salary of employees increased, each as compared to 2009. The discount rate increased from 8.75% to 8.96%, while both the rate of increase in compensation levels and rate of increase in retirement pensions decreased from 5.50% to 5.10% and from 5.00% to 4.60%, respectively, each as compared to 2009. The seniority premium benefit due to death was removed and the “flat fee” of the health care plan was adjusted. These changes resulted in a significant increase in actuarial gains and losses relative to the number of employees participating in the plan.

Actuarial assumptions, expressed in nominal rates, used in the calculation of employee benefits plan cost under U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, were as follows:

       2011           2010           2009     

Discount rate

   8.81%     8.96%     8.75%  

Rate of increase in compensation levels

   5.10%     5.10%     5.50%  

Expected long-term rate of return on assets

   8.81%     8.75%     8.75%  

Health care cost trend rate

   6.36%     5.93%     5.93%  

Rate of increase in retirement pensions

   4.60%     4.60%     5.00%  

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

The calculation of employee benefits plan cost under Topic 715 requires considerable judgment with respect to choosing actuarial assumptions. Each significant assumption reflects PEMEX’s best estimate of the plan’s future performance solely with respect to that assumption. Assumed discount rates and compensation levels often have the greatest effect on employee benefits plan cost, and are related, because both are affected by some of the same economic factors. The discount rate is based upon the current prices for settling the pension obligation, referred to as the “settlement rate,” and the current yield on high quality corporate bonds (AA or better) of term and currency consistent with the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. According to the external actuary, assumed compensation levels reflect PEMEX’s estimate of actual future compensation levels for the individuals involved and are consistent with assumed discount rates to the extent that both incorporate expectations of the same future economic conditions.

PEMEX makes supplemental payments in respect of its obligations for gas, gasoline and basic food supplies, and provides healthcare benefits, in each case to retired employees and their immediate family members. PEMEX regularly adjusts the level of its supplemental payments based on inflationary conditions. Healthcare is provided through a regional network of PEMEX hospitals and medical centers, which also provide care to active PEMEX employees. No commitments have been made regarding the level of such contributions in the future.

Payments charged to the reserve for medical and hospital services for retired personnel and pension recipients in 2011 and 2010 were Ps. 4,318,723 and Ps. 4,312,712, respectively.

The expected timing of payments of employee benefits according to the plans in each of the next ten years, through 2021, is as follows:

Year

  Retirement  and
Termination

Expected Benefit Payment
   Post-retirement
Expected  Benefit
Payment
 

2012

  Ps.24,679,077    Ps.11,756,419  

2013

   22,585,536     12,976,288  

2014

   24,784,573     14,321,167  

2015

   27,224,023     15,811,106  

2016

   29,637,350     17,426,102  

2017

   37,050,236     18,791,438  

2018

   37,050,236     18,791,438  

2019

   37,050,236     18,791,438  

2020

   37,050,236     18,791,438  

2021

   37,050,237     18,791,439  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  Ps.        314,161,740    Ps.    166,248,273  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The objectives of PEMEX’s investment guidelines with respect to its plan assets are to preserve capital and provide an adequate rate of return. The comparative benchmark used by PEMEX is weighted average rate of (i) the daily governmental funding rate released by the Banco de México (Mexican Central Bank) and (ii) the daily inter-bank funding rate released by the Banco de México, each of which is multiplied by the proportion of such securities within PEMEX’s portfolio.

The investment guidelines list certain prohibited investments, such as: securities of companies that are subject to intervention by a regulatory authority; subordinated securities; convertible securities; certain foreign exchange securities; derivatives such as futures, forwards, swaps, options, exotic options, swaptions, etc. (except structured

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

notes denominated in pesos with protected initial investment); securities having terms with certain characteristics such as liquidity, risk, return, or maturity that do not comply with certain requirements set by PEMEX’s Financial Resources Committee; and securities not registered with theRegistro Nacional de Valores (National Securities Registry) of theComisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (National Banking and Securities Commission).

The expected long-term rate of return is based on the guidelines of the Mexican Society of Consulting Actuaries, which annually issues recommendations for selecting financial assumptions based on a historical analysis conducted using economic variables such as inflation, risk-free interest rates and increases to the legal minimum wage as well as salaries in general.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, all of PEMEX’s plan assets were invested in Mexican Government bonds and bonds issued by financial institutions and corporations registered with the National Securities Registry. The following table shows PEMEX’s actual investment allocation at December 31 of each year.

Securities

  2011   2010 

Mexican Government Securities

  Ps.2,769,490    Ps.2,396,647  

Bonds issued by financial institutions and corporations registered with the National Securities Registry

   874,882     713,712  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  Ps.  3,644,372    Ps.  3,110,359  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Since the other post-retirement benefits are not based on levels of compensation, it is not necessary to use salary increase assumptions to determine expenses. The effect of a 1% increase in the healthcare cost trend rate was to increase net expense for other post-retirement benefits by Ps. 24,052,734 for 2011, Ps. 17,235,983 for 2010 and Ps. 24,607,685 for 2009, and to increase the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation by Ps. 206,878,601 for 2011, Ps. 168,212,154 for 2010 and Ps. 238,461,119 for 2009. The effect of a 1% decrease in the healthcare cost trend rate was to decrease net expense for other post-retirement benefits by Ps. 15,463,800 for 2011, Ps. 11,837,458 for 2010 and Ps. 16,036,265 for 2009, and to decrease the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation by Ps. 138,804,919 for 2011, Ps. 120,410,538 for 2010 and Ps. 160,752,480 for 2009.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

PEMEX recognized U.S. GAAP codified in Topic 715, and included their effects in the results of the actuarial valuation of its labor obligations, effective January 1, 2007. The following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

   Employee Benefits 
   2011  2010 

Change in projected benefit obligation (PBO):

   

Projected benefit obligation (PBO) at beginning of year

  Ps.  787,285,745   Ps.  919,342,584  

Service cost

   16,082,224    15,851,605  

Interest cost

   65,910,191    71,916,878  

Actuarial (gains) losses

   12,271,863    (190,231,036

Benefits paid

   (33,048,645  (29,594,286
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

  Ps.848,501,378   Ps.787,285,745  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Change in plan assets:

   

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  Ps.3,110,359   Ps.3,149,120  

Actual return on plan assets

   560,062    625,303  

Company contributions

   28,717,439    24,620,000  

Benefits paid

   (28,743,488  (25,284,064
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  Ps.3,644,372   Ps.3,110,359  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additional fair value disclosures about plan assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2011 

Asset Category

  Total   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Observable

Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Mexican Government Securities

  Ps.   2,769,490    Ps.     2,769,490    Ps.                —    Ps.                —  

Bonds issued by financial institutions and corporations registered with the National Securities Registry

   874,882     874,882             —             —  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  Ps.  3,644,372    Ps.  3,644,372    Ps.    Ps.  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2010 

Asset Category

  Total   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Observable

Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Mexican Government Securities

  Ps.   2,396,647    Ps.    2,396,647    Ps.                —    Ps.                —  

Bonds issued by financial institutions and corporations registered with the National Securities Registry

   713,712     713,712             —             —  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  Ps.  3,110,359    Ps.  3,110,359    Ps.    Ps.  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Additional information about plan assets, including methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of plan assets, is as follows:

 

 

Pemex-Refining filed a claim (No. 485/2012-VI) before theMexican Government SecuritiesJuzgado Décimo Primero de Distrito en Materia Civil (MGS) include(Eleventh District Civil Court) in the Federal District requesting that the arbitration award be declared null and void. On November 12, 2013, the Eleventh District Civil Court issued a judgment declaring the arbitration award valid. Both parties subsequently filedCetesamparos (Nos. D.C. 3/2014 and D.C. 4/2014) before theCuarto Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Primer Circuito (Fourth Joint Civil Court of the First Circuit), fixed rateBonos, floating rateBondes andB-PATs(Savings Protection Bonds with quarterly interest payment), and inflation-linkedUdibonos. Each quarter, the SHCP announces the auction schedule for all MGS. The fair value of these investments is based on market prices obtained from local professional price providerswhich as of the measurement date.date of these consolidated financial statements are still pending. In a concurrent proceeding, on December 14, 2011, CONPROCA filed a claim before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York requesting the enforcement of the ICA award in its favor. On October 17, 2013, the U.S. District Court issued an order staying both the enforcement of the arbitration award and any further proceedings pending the Mexican court’s determination of the validity of the arbitration award in Mexico.

 

  

BondsIn December 2004, COMMISA filed an arbitration claim (No. 13613/CCO/JRF) before the ICA against Pemex-Exploration and Production for, among other things, the breach of a construction agreement in connection with two platforms in the Cantarell project (Project No. IPC-01). On December 16, 2009, the ICA issued by financial institutionsan arbitration award requiring Pemex-Exploration and corporations registered withProduction to pay U.S. $293,645 and Ps. 34,459, plus interest, to COMMISA, and also requiring COMMISA to pay Pemex-Exploration and Production a sum of approximately U.S. $5,919, plus interest. On January 11, 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production was notified that COMMISA had filed a motion (No. 10-cv-00206-AKH) before the National Securities RegistryU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York requesting the enforcement of the arbitration award in its favor. On November 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court issued a judgment recognizing the award and ordering Pemex-Exploration and Production to pay U.S. $355,864. On November 15, 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed an appeal against this resolution before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. On October 24, 2011, theJuzgado Quinto de Distrito en Materia Civilare debt securities (Fifth Civil District Court) in the Federal District granted a motion requesting that canthe arbitration award be denominateddeclared null and void. Based on this resolution, on February 16, 2012, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted a motion requesting that the judgment against Pemex-Exploration and Production be declared void, vacating the U.S. District Court’s judgment and remanding the case to the U.S. District Court for reconsideration in pesos or UDIs. The fairlight of the intervening decision of the Mexican court. On September 25, 2013, the U.S. District Court confirmed the arbitration award in favor of COMMISA, ordering Pemex-Exploration and Production to pay COMMISA U.S. $465,060 and for each party to pay its own value added taxes. In November 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production deposited the award amount in a bank account in New York as a condition to its motion to appeal the resolution filed before the Second Circuit Court of these investments is based on market prices obtained from local professional price providersAppeals, which as of the measurement date.

date of these consolidated financial statements is still pending.

(e)Leases

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, PEMEX did not have any significant operating lease arrangements. However, PEMEX did enterIn a concurrent proceeding, on January 22, 2013, COMMISA submitted a request to a court in 2008 into capital lease arrangements for a total of U.S. $435,235 in payments at an implicit fixed rate of 7.96% to 8.00% and an established term of 2008-2019 (see Note 11).

(f)Supplemental geographic information

The majority of PEMEX’s operations are in Mexico. The following table shows PEMEX’s domestic and export salesLuxembourg for the years endedprecautionary attachment of assets owned by Pemex-Exploration and Production and Petróleos Mexicanos and the execution of the arbitration award. The precautionary attachment of assets was granted on January 23, 2013, and on July 15, 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production and Petróleos Mexicanos filed an appeal against the resolution. On December 31 (on24, 2013, the court granted the appeal against the resolution to attach the assets. On March 22, 2013, the court recognized the arbitration award and ordered its execution. On June 26, 2013, Pemex-Exploration and Production and Petróleos Mexicanos filed an appeal against the resolution recognizing the arbitration award. On September 10, 2013, COMMISA filed its pleadings in connection with this appeal and a Mexican FRS basis):

   2011   2010   2009 

Domestic sales

  Ps.779,197,974    Ps.683,853,335    Ps.596,369,519  

Export sales:

      

United States

   613,805,564     491,091,912     400,445,291  

Canada; Central and South America

   34,921,636     16,875,503     10,636,415  

Europe

   70,567,172     56,526,837     46,877,837  

Far East

   53,670,990     28,413,431     30,300,753  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total export sales

  Ps.772,965,362    Ps.592,907,683    Ps.488,260,296  

Services income

   6,265,586     5,303,292     5,291,516  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total sales

  Ps.  1,558,428,922    Ps.  1,282,064,310    Ps.  1,089,921,331  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

PEMEX does not have significant long-lived assets outside of Mexico.

Forhearing will be held before the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, under Mexican FRS, PEMEX recognized non-cash fixed asset impairment charges and, in 2011 and 2010, reversals as discussed in Note 21 I(f).appellate court on May 12, 2014.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(g)In February 2010, theValuationServicio de Administración Tributaria (Tax Management Service) notified Pemex-Exploration and qualifying accountsProduction of the results of its review of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 with respect to federal taxes, the value added tax and the Ordinary Hydrocarbons Duty payable by it. On September 20, 2010, the Tax Management Service determined that Pemex-Exploration and Production owed additional taxes totaling Ps. 4,575,208 (of which Pemex-Exploration and Production was notified on September 22, 2010). On November 30, 2010, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed an administrative claim before theTercera Sala Regional Metropolitana (Third Regional Metropolitan Court) of theTribunal Federal de Justicia Fiscal y Administrativa (Tax and Administrative Federal Court) challenging the assessment. On November 20, 2013, the claim was admitted by theSala Superior (Superior Court) of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court (file No. 28733/10-17-03-7/1838/13-S1-05-04). As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, this matter is still pending.

The valuation

In February 2010, the Tax Management Service notified Pemex-Refining of the results of its review of Pemex-Refining’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 with respect to federal taxes, the value added tax and qualifying accounts for PEMEX are as follows:

Description

  Balance at
Beginning of
Period
   Additions
Charged to Costs
and Expenses
   Deductions  Balance at End
of Period
 

For the year ended December 31, 2011:

       

Reserves deducted in the statement of financial position from the assets to which they apply:

       

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  Ps.1,556,853    Ps.162,499    Ps.(67,950 Ps.1,651,402  

For the year ended December 31, 2010:

       

Reserves deducted in the statement of financial position from the assets to which they apply:

       

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  Ps.1,354,849    Ps.  326,448    Ps.  (124,444 Ps.  1,556,853  

For the year ended December 31, 2009:

       

Reserves deducted in the statement of financial position from the assets to which they apply:

       

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  Ps.  1,738,099    Ps.81,990    Ps.(465,240 Ps.1,354,849  
the Hydrocarbon Income Tax. On September 20, 2010, the Tax Management Service notified Pemex-Refining that it owed approximately Ps. 1,553,371 (including penalties and interest). On November 30, 2010, Pemex-Refining filed an administrative claim before the Third Regional Metropolitan Court of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court challenging the assessment. On November 20, 2013, the claim was admitted by the Superior Court of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court (file No. 28733/10-17-03-7/1838/13-S1-05-04). As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, this matter is still pending.

 

Note:The above valuationOn April 14, 2010, Petróleos Mexicanos and qualifying accounts are presentedPemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals were summoned before theJuzgado Séptimo de Distrito (Seventh District Court) in accordanceReynosa, Tamaulipas, in connection with U.S. GAAP. The Mexican FRS accounts titled “Reservea civil claim filed by Irma Ayala Tijerina de Barroso, et al., seeking approximately Ps. 1,490,873 in damages for sundry creditors and others” and “Reserve for employee benefits” are accrued liability accounts, not valuation and qualifying accounts, and have not been includedthe alleged contamination of land adjacent to water treatment facilities. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the trial is still in the table above (which includes the reserve for dismantlementevidentiary stage and, abandonment activities).therefore, a final resolution is still pending.

 

(h)Significant risksIn February 2011, EMS Energy Services de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. and uncertaintiesEnergy Maintenance Services Group I. LLC filed a claim against Pemex-Exploration and Production before theJuzgado Tercero de Distrito (Third District Court) in Villahermosa, Tabasco (No. 227/2010). The plaintiffs are seeking, among other things, damages totaling U.S. $193,713 related to the termination of a public works contract and non-payment by Pemex-Exploration and Production under the contract. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the trial is in the evidentiary stage. In a concurrent administrative proceeding, Pemex-Exploration and Production was summoned before theSéptima Sala Regional Metropolitana (Seventh Regional Metropolitan Court) of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court on April 4, 2011, in connection with an administrative claim (No. 4957/11-17-07-1) filed by the plaintiffs seeking that Pemex-Exploration and Production’s termination of the public works contract be declared null and void. Pemex-Exploration and Production filed its response to the claim on June 13, 2011. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the trial is in the pleading stage.

Environmental

The ultimate costs to be incurred in relation to PEMEX’s environmental contingencies may exceed the total amounts reserved. Additional liabilities may be accrued as assessment work is completed, and formal remediation plans are formulated. Numerous factors affect the reliability and precision of cleanup cost estimates, including the individual characteristics of each affected site, the lack of specific guidance as to permissible levels of pollution and the type of technology available for remediation, as well as general economic factors, such as inflation.

As discussed above in this Note, PEMEX accrues an environmental liability when a reasonable estimate of the costs for remediation or cleanup of the identified affected area has been made. In some cases, investigations are not yet at a stage where PEMEX is able to quantify the liability or estimate a range of possible exposure. In such cases, the amounts of PEMEX’s liabilities are indeterminate due to the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the imprecise and potentially conflicting engineering evaluations and estimates of proper cleanup methods and costs, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, and the ambiguities in Mexican environmental laws and regulations.

PEMEX is not aware of any unasserted claims or assessments that may give rise to an environmental liability, and therefore, no amounts related to such items have been reflected in the environmental accrual.
On July 5, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production was summoned before theJuzgado Décimo Segundo de Distrito en Materia Civil (Twelfth District Civil Court) in the Federal District in connection with a civil claim (No. 469/2010) filed by Saboratto, S.A. de C.V. for, among other things, liability and damages in connection with various services agreements. Saboratto, S.A. de C.V. is seeking approximately Ps. 1,451,472 in total damages. On August 5, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production filed its response to this claim. On December 20, 2013, the parties were notified that a judgment will be issued; however, as of the date of these consolidated financial statements, a final resolution is still pending.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Mexican Government

The operations and results of PEMEX have been, and may in the future be, affected from time to time in varying degrees by political developments and laws and regulations, such as forced divestiture of assets, budgetary adjustments, restrictions on production levels and capital expenditures, price controls, tax increases, cancellation of contract rights, refined product specifications and environmental, health and safety regulations. Both the likelihood of such occurrences and their overall effect upon PEMEX cannot be estimated reliably.

Labor

PEMEX employees belonging to the Petroleum Workers’ Union (the “Union”) represent approximately 72% of its workforce. They have a collective bargaining agreement, which is renegotiated every two years. On July 27, 2011, Petróleos Mexicanos and the Union executed a new collective bargaining agreement that became effective on August 1, 2011. The new agreement provides for a 4.75% increase in wages and a 1.15% increase in benefits. By its terms, the new collective bargaining agreement is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2013.

Product prices

Because PEMEX’s major products are energy-related commodities, significant changes in the international prices of crude oil, natural gas, refined products and petrochemical products could have a significant impact on PEMEX’s results of operations in any particular year. In 2011, crude oil represented approximately 39% of PEMEX’s sales revenues, and prices of the products that PEMEX produces can be influenced by changes in crude oil prices, which makes it reasonably possible that PEMEX could suffer near-term severe impacts from fluctuations in such prices.

 

(i)On July 8, 2011, Pemex-Exploration and Production was summoned in connection with an administrative claim (No. 4334/11-11-02-6) filed by Compañía Petrolera La Norma, S.A., against the Director General of Petróleos Mexicanos and the Director General of Pemex-Exploration and Production before theCapitalized software costsSegunda Sala Regional Hidalgo-México (Hidalgo-Mexico Second Regional Court) of the Tax and Administrative Federal Court in Tlalnepantla, State of Mexico. The plaintiff is seeking compensation in connection with the cancellation of its alleged petroleum rights concessions, including damages for up to Ps. 1,552,730. On April 2, 2013, the court notified the parties that it admitted an amendment to the claim, which was subsequently appealed by the defendants. In addition, on April 9, 2013, a new claim was filed before the same court (No. 438/12-11-02-3). The defendants requested that it be joined to the previous claim, which the court allowed on May 2, 2013. On July 18, 2013, the defendants filed a response to the amended joint claim (No. 438/12-11-02-3). On November 19, 2013, the defendants filed an expert opinion in support of their response. The designation of an independent expert is still pending. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the trial is in the evidentiary stage.

Direct internalThe results of these proceedings are uncertain until their final resolutions are issued by the appropriate authorities. PEMEX has recorded liabilities for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and external coststhe amount thereof can be reasonably estimated. When a reasonable estimation could not be made, qualitative disclosure was provided in the notes to these consolidated financial statements.

PEMEX does not disclose amounts accrued for each individual claim because such disclosure could adversely affect PEMEX’s legal strategy, as well as the outcome of the related litigation.

NOTE 24—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

During the period from January 1 to May 14, 2014, PEMEX participated in the developmentfollowing financing activities:

On January 23, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos issued U.S. $4,000,000 of internal use softwareits debt securities under its U.S. $32,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C in three tranches: (i) U.S. $500,000 of its 3.125% Notes due 2019; (ii) U.S. $500,000 of its 4.875% Notes due 2024, which was a reopening of its 4.875% Notes due 2024 originally issued on July 18, 2013; and (iii) U.S. $3,000,000 of its 6.375% Bonds due 2045. All debt securities issued under this program are deferredguaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and included in other assets. Capitalized software costs, netProduction, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On January 23, 2014, the SHCP authorized the increase of amortization, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, amountedthe Petróleos Mexicanos’ Medium-Term Notes Program from U.S. $32,000,000 to Ps. 3,672 and Ps. 6,655, respectively. Amortization expense related to capitalized software costs for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 amounted to Ps. 563, Ps. 24,368 and Ps. 96,336, respectively.U.S. $42,000,000.

On January 30, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos issued Ps. 7,500,000 aggregate principal amount ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 at a fixed rate of 7.19%, consisting of (i) an international offering outside of Mexico of Ps. 2,616,050 ofCertificados Bursátiles in the form of GDNs, and (ii) a concurrent offering to the public in Mexico of Ps. 4,883,950 ofCertificados Bursátiles not represented by GDNs. The issuance represented the second reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2024 originally issued on September 26, 2013 and reopened on December 11, 2013. Concurrently, Petróleos Mexicanos issued, in the Mexican market, Ps. 5,000,000 aggregate principal amount ofCertificados Bursátiles in two tranches: one at a floating rate for Ps. 2,000,000 due 2019, which was a reopening of the same series ofCertificados Bursátiles due 2019 originally issued on September 19, 2013 and reopened on December 11, 2013; and the second at a fixed rate of 3.94% for UDIs equivalent to Ps. 3,000,000 due 2026. Thesecertificados bursátiles were issued under Petróleos

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(j)

Mexicanos’ Ps. 300,000,000 or UDI equivalentSupplemental condensed information on a U.S. GAAP basisCertificados Bursátiles Dual Program. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

On March 10, 2014, Pemex-Exploration and Production obtained a letter of credit for Ps. 513,810 that matures on May 9, 2014.

On March 20, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos borrowed U.S. $1,000,000 from its revolving credit line, which bears interest at a floating rate linked to LIBOR and matures on May 22, 2014.

On March 21, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos obtained a loan for U.S. $300,000 from an export credit agency, which bears interest at a rate of 2.351% and matures in March 2018.

On April 16, 2014, Petróleos Mexicanos issued €1,000,000 of its 3.75% Notes due 2026. These notes were issued under Petróleos Mexicanos’ U.S. $42,000,000 Medium-Term Notes Program, Series C. All debt securities issued under this program are guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Between January 1 and May 14, 2014, PMI HBV obtained U.S. $530,000 from its revolving credit line and repaid U.S. $1,080,000.

On May 14, 2014, the Mexican peso-U.S. dollar exchange rate was Ps. 12.9534 per U.S. dollar, which represents a 0.95% appreciation of the value of the peso in U.S. dollar terms as compared to the exchange rate as of December 31, 2013, which was Ps. 13.0765 per U.S. dollar.

On May 14, 2014, the weighted average price of the crude oil exported by PEMEX was U.S. $97.64 per barrel; this price increased by approximately 5.55% as compared to the average price as of December 31, 2013, which was U.S. $92.51 per barrel.

On February 4 and 7, 2014, the Organic Statute of Petróleos Mexicanos was amended. These amendments set forth or revised the responsibilities and functions of several of PEMEX’s offices and departments.

As of December 31, 2013, PEMEX has valued and recorded the 53,703,915 Repsol shares acquired through PMI HBV as an investment in equity instruments. The market value of Repsol shares has increased approximately 9.99% from €18.32 per share as of December 31, 2013 to €20.15 per share as of May 14, 2014.

On March 21, 2014, as part of Round Zero, Petróleos Mexicanos submitted to the Ministry of Energy a request that PEMEX be assigned the right to continue to explore and develop areas that together contain 96% of Mexico’s estimated proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2013. The transitional articles of the Energy Reform Decree provide that the Ministry of Energy will take the following condensed consolidating information reflects the U.S. GAAP adjustments disclosed in this Note.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF

DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010factors into consideration when determining whether to grant PEMEX an assignment:

 

   2011  2010 
   

 

  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
 

Assets:

   

Total current assets

  Ps. 345,814,725   Ps.319,629,205  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment, net

   1,144,258,209    1,064,641,518  

Current deferred income tax assets

   1,917,177    503,377  

Other assets

   23,369,045    17,898,140  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  Ps.1,515,359,156   Ps. 1,402,672,240  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities:

   

Current liabilities

  Ps.254,219,294   Ps.208,376,392  

Current reserve for employee benefits

   36,435,495    74,625,335  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   290,654,789    283,001,727  

Long-term debt

   672,275,110    575,170,797  

Reserve for sundry creditors and others

   64,284,262    55,493,441  

Reserve for employee benefits

   808,421,511    709,550,051  

Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities

   5,925,289    7,338,545  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,841,560,961    1,630,554,561  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity (deficit)

   (326,201,805  (227,882,321
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  Ps.1,515,359,156   Ps.1,402,672,240  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
with respect to areas that PEMEX was actively exploring in which it had made commercial discoveries or investments as of December 21, 2013, its investment capacity and evidence of a detailed plan for exploration; and

with respect to areas that PEMEX already had under production as of December 21, 2013, a development plan for producing fields, including evidence of proper development of such fields and the ability to efficiently and competitively carry out production activities.

The Ministry of Energy has a deadline of September 17, 2014 to respond to the request.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

   2011  2010  2009 
   

 

  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
 

Total revenues

  Ps. 1,558,428,922   Ps. 1,282,064,310   Ps. 1,089,921,331  

Cost of sales

   786,155,342    610,286,509    529,173,388  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

   772,273,580    671,777,801    560,747,943  

General expenses

   96,378,058    104,252,731    100,509,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   675,895,522    567,525,070    460,238,943  

Other revenues

   195,544,884    71,585,528    39,768,759  

Comprehensive financing result (cost)

   (106,616,454  (3,276,791  (5,093,650

Profit sharing in non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   (796,398  1,540,688    (767,228
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before taxes, duties and other, and non-controlling interest

   764,027,554    637,374,495    494,146,824  

Taxes and duties, net of IEPS Tax

   (874,186,617  (654,098,852  (546,587,044

Non-controlling interest

   210,166    217,437    160,285  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  Ps.(109,948,897 Ps.(16,506,920 Ps.(52,279,935
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

   2011  2010  2009 
   

 

  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
  (Restated
Note 3(ab)(i))
 

Operating Activities:

    

Net loss for the year

  Ps. (109,948,897 Ps. (16,506,920 Ps. (52,279,935

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   97,915,209    94,160,021    74,661,616  

Net periodic cost of employee benefits

   96,834,166    107,028,936    77,815,719  

Impairment

           1,731,229  

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

   3,496,758    3,074,468      

Non-controlling interest

   (210,166  (217,437  (160,285

Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss

   74,400,173    (28,458,699  (11,350,064

Interest expense

   1,449,453    981,319    1,305,465  

Profit sharing in subsidiaries

   796,398    (1,540,688  767,228  

Deferred income taxes

   (2,827,056  240,843    (152,872

Unsuccessful wells

   12,021,450    11,619,243    15,124,465  

Unrealized losses on financial instruments

   7,137,613    7,521,648      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   181,065,101    177,902,734    107,462,566  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts and notes receivable

   (22,843,980  23,910,258    (5,162,958

Inventories

   (3,633,596  (2,069,851  28,276,325  

Other assets

   (3,673,619  (1,795,472  28,079,171  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   26,877,093    (10,495,715  43,625,973  

Employee benefits contributions and payments

   (33,179,270  (29,110,910  (24,534,500
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

   144,611,729    158,341,044    177,746,577  

Investing Activities:

    

Acquisition and disposal of fixed assets, net

   (176,200,620  (186,314,964  (214,042,970

Exploration costs

   (4,135,188  (6,343,062  (1,189,944

Investments in subsidiaries

   (20,783,820)��        
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

   (201,119,628  (192,658,026  (215,232,914

Financing Activities:

    

Proceeds from new long-term financing

   189,693,018    235,881,933    160,177,586  

Financing payments

   (152,118,845  (197,098,458  (107,544,073

Increase in equity of Subsidiary Entities

       122    467,210  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

   37,574,173    38,783,597    53,100,723  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effects of change in cash value

   2,168,085    (1,345,391  (1,659,153

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (18,933,726  3,121,224    13,955,233  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

   131,300,852    128,179,628    114,224,395  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  Ps.114,535,211   Ps.131,300,852   Ps.128,179,628  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental cash disclosures:

    

Interest paid (net of amounts capitalized)

  Ps.33,381,090   Ps.38,722,581   Ps.49,073,057  

Taxes paid

   862,811,187    650,028,049    514,852,268  

Supplemental non-cash disclosures:

    

Fair value from investment securities

  Ps. 3,872,160   Ps.   Ps.  

Effect in equity of employee benefits

   2,973,276    209,936,104    (229,690,261

Derivative financial instruments

   232,378    (390,909  2,532,882  

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(k)Cash and cash equivalents

Changes to Mexican FRS C-1 were effective on January 1, 2010. These changes require the presentation of restricted cash as part of the line item “Cash and cash equivalents” on the statement of financial position. See Notes 3(e) and 5.

Under U.S. GAAP, ASC 210-10-S99-1 states that separate disclosure on the statement of financial position shall be made for cash items which are restricted as to withdrawal or usage. The provisions related to any restrictions shall be described in the footnotesOn April 30, 2014, President Enrique Peña Nieto submitted to the financial statements.

Accordingly, the amount presented in the line item “Cash and cash equivalents, end of period” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows prepared for U.S. GAAP purposes will not match the amount presented in the line item “Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows prepared under Mexican FRS.

(l)Deferred income taxes

PEMEX follows theCongress bills proposing secondary legislation intended to implement certain provisions of the revised FRS D-4 forEnergy Reform Decree. Among other things, these proposed bills provide PEMEX with additional technical, managerial and budgetary autonomy designed to increase its production and allow it to compete effectively with other oil and gas companies that enter the Mexican FRS purposes. Accounting for income taxes in accordance with this statement is similar to accounting for income taxes under U.S. GAAP in accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income taxes.”

energy sector. As described in Note 19, during 2005, a new fiscal regime applicable to Petróleos Mexicanos and its Subsidiary Entities was enacted. Beginning on January 1, 2006, certain Subsidiary Companies of PEMEX becameMay 14, 2014, the proposed bills are subject to the tax regime applicable to all other Mexican corporations. In general, Mexican companies are taxed based on pre-tax income at a statutory rate. The statutory corporate income tax rate in Mexico was 30% for each of 2009, 2010review, debate and 2011. As a result of the change in fiscal regime in 2005, PEMEX began generating deferred income taxes during that year.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the primary components of the net deferred tax liability under U.S. GAAP consisted of the following:

   2011  2010 

Current deferred tax asset:

   

Accounts and other receivables

  Ps.95,621   Ps. 629,910  

Inventories

   469,972    162,571  

Accrued liabilities

   449,621    329,254  

Prepaids and other current assets

   941,980    (19,105
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current deferred tax asset

   1,957,194    1,102,630  

Less: current valuation allowance

   (40,017  (599,253
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net current deferred tax asset

  Ps. 1,917,177   Ps. 503,377  

Noncurrent deferred tax asset:

   

Contingencies

  Ps.442,674   Ps. 1,187,499  

Derivative financial instruments

   1,869,982    182,115  

Reserve for environmental costs

   5,857    1,017,289  

Fixed assets

       (2,496,733
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noncurrent deferred tax asset

   2,318,513    (109,830

Less: noncurrent valuation allowance

       59,690  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net noncurrent deferred tax asset

  Ps.2,318,513   Ps.(50,140

Noncurrent deferred tax (liability):

   

Other (liabilities) assets

  Ps.(455,611 Ps.306,049  

Fixed assets

   (7,788,191  (7,594,454
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net noncurrent deferred tax (liability)

   (8,243,802  (7,288,405
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noncurrent deferred tax (liability)

   (5,925,289  (7,338,545
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax (liability)

  Ps.(4,008,112 Ps. (6,835,168
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liability under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.(4,008,112 Ps.(6,835,168

Net deferred tax liability under Mexican FRS

   (6,217,833  (7,215,760
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net U.S. GAAP adjustments to the net deferred tax (liability)

  Ps.2,209,721   Ps.380,592  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Due to the items presented in the table below, Income Tax and IRP on income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes differed from the amounts computed by applying to income (loss) the Mexican statutory rate of 30% for both Income Tax and IRP.

   2011  2010  2009 

Income Tax:

    

Computed “expected” tax expense

  Ps. 3,424,715    Ps. 1,198,550    Ps. 1,837,132  

Effects of inflation, net

   24,352    (34,055  (80,936

Non-deductible expenses

   153,856    344,147      

Difference between accounting and tax depreciation

   4,783    216,164      

Other, net

   12,825        (348
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income Tax Expense

  Ps.3,620,531    Ps. 1,724,806    Ps. 1,755,848  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

IRP:

    

Computed “expected” tax expense (benefit)

  Ps.308,350    Ps. 3,651,436    Ps. 4,157,708  

Effects of inflation, net

   (1,451,186  (1,475,355  (2,036,386

Non-taxable loss (profit) sharing in subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   14,826    (15,558  (1,707,854

Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

   (499,546  (3,429,265  1,128,798  

Non-deductible expenses

   579,937    3,534,655    914,370  

Other, net

   (73,041  151,847      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

IRP Expense

  Ps.(1,120,660  Ps. 2,417,760    Ps. 2,456,636  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PEMEX follows the guidance codified in Topic 740, which clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions, requiring that an entity recognize in its consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position if—based on the technical merits of that position—it is more likely than not to be sustained upon further examination. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount for which there is a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period during which the change in judgment occurs. PEMEX’s accounting policy is to accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits only if and when required as a component of other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. The adoption of Topic 740 did not have any effect on PEMEX’s consolidated financial statements.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, PEMEX considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during those periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future income over the periods for which the deferred tax assets are deductible, PEMEX believes it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the valuation allowance.

As of January 1, 2009, and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, PEMEX did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and thus recorded no related deferred tax, Income Tax or IRP. In addition, PEMEX does not expect its amount of unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly within the next 12 months. The income tax returns of Petróleos Mexicanos, its Subsidiary Companies and Subsidiary Entities, for tax years 2003 and thereafter, remain subject to examinationrevision by the Mexican tax authorities. See Note 19.Congress, and therefore it is uncertain what the final scope and terms of any approved bill will be.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, NOTE 25—SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIESGUARANTOR INFORMATION:

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

(m)Asset retirement obligations

PEMEX’s liability provisions recognized in the statement of financial position represent obligations whose settlement will likely require the future use of estimated economic resources. These provisions have been recorded based on the present value of management’s best estimate of future payments necessary to settle the liability. However, actual results could differ from the provisions recognized. No assets or trust funds have been established to satisfy these obligations.

ASC Topic 410 “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (“Topic 410”) clarifies that the phrase “conditional asset retirement obligation,” as used in Topic 410, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity for which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditioned on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists as to the timing and/or method of settlement. Uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. Topic 410 acknowledges that, in some cases, sufficient information may not be available to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. Topic 410 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. PEMEX’s adoption of Topic 410 did not have a material impact on PEMEX’s financial position or results of operations.

The following table indicates the changes to PEMEX’s pre-tax asset retirement obligations in 2011 and 2010:

  2011  2010 

Balance as of January 1

  Ps. 37,698,629    Ps. 24,488,953  

Liabilities incurred and cost adjustments, net

  (1,558,333  11,921,737  

Accretion expense

  1,383,889    3,428,357  

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

  4,982,817    (2,140,418
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31

  Ps. 42,507,002    Ps. 37,698,629  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 22—SUBSIDIARY GUARANTOR INFORMATION, PIDIREGAS LIABILITIES AND THE PEMEX PROJECT FUNDING MASTER TRUST (THE MASTER TRUST):

The following consolidating information presents (a)presents: (i) condensed consolidating statements of financial position at December 31, 20112013 and 20102012 and condensed consolidating statements of operationscomprehensive income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 of Petróleos Mexicanos, Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining, Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries (as defined below; excluding the Master Trust) and (b) condensed consolidating statement of financial position at December 31, 2010 and(ii) condensed consolidating statements of operations and cash flows for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2010 and 20092011 of the Master Trust.Trust as required by Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC.

These condensed consolidating statements are prepared in conformity with Mexican FRS,IFRS, with one exception: for the purposes of the presentation of the subsidiary guarantor information, the Subsidiary Entities and Subsidiary Companies have been accounted for as investments under the equity method by Petróleos Mexicanos. Earnings of subsidiaries are therefore reflected in Petróleos Mexicanos’ investment account and earnings. The principal elimination entries eliminate Petróleos Mexicanos’ investment in subsidiaries and inter-company balances and transactions. Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals (collectively, the

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

“Subsidiary “Subsidiary Guarantors”) and Pemex-Petrochemicals are 100%-owned subsidiaries of Petróleos Mexicanos. Pemex-Petrochemicals, Pemex Finance, Ltd. and the Subsidiary Companies collectively comprise the non-guarantor subsidiaries (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Petróleos Mexicanos’ guaranty of the indebtedness of the Master Trust was full and unconditional, until the second half of 2009, when Petróleos Mexicanos assumed, as primary obligor, all payment obligations under PIDIREGAS financings entered into by the Master Trust, as discussed in Note 3(b). The guaranties by the Subsidiary Guarantors of Petróleos Mexicanos’ payment obligations under this indebtedness are full and unconditional and joint and several.

The Master Trust is consolidated in the financial statements of PEMEX as of and for the years ended 2010 and 2009 in accordance with consolidation principles detailed in FRS B-8 “Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.” The Master Trust was dissolved effective December 20, 2011 and is no longer consolidated in the financial statements of PEMEX as of December 31, 2011. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Master Trust is a special purpose entity requiring consolidation in the financial statements, as it does not meet non-consolidation criteria as specified in U.S. accounting literature.2011 and thereafter.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

The following table sets forth, as of the date of this report,these consolidated financial statements, the principal amount outstanding of the registered debt securities originally issued by the Master Trust. As noted above, Petróleos Mexicanos has assumed, as primary obligor, all of the obligations of the Master Trust under these debt securities. The obligations of Petróleos Mexicanos are guaranteed by the Subsidiary Guarantors:

Table 1: Registered Debt Securities originally issued by the Master Trust and

Assumed by

Petróleos Mexicanos

 

Security(1)

  Primary
Obligor
  

Guarantors

  Principal
Amount
Outstanding
 

5.75% Notes due 2015

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals  U.S. $234,372  

5.75% Guaranteed Notes due 2018

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   2,483,988  

6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2035

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   1,748,7951,750,000  

6.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2038

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   491,175  

7.375% Notes due 2014

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   362,995  

8.625% Bonds due 2022

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   160,245  

8.625% Guaranteed Bonds due 2023

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   106,507  

9 1/4% Guaranteed Bonds due 2018

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   107,109  

9.50% Guaranteed Bonds due 2027

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   219,217  

(1)The Master Trust was the original issuer of each of these series of securities. Petróleos Mexicanos assumed, as primary obligor, all payment obligations of the Master Trust under each of these series of securities in 2009.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

The following table sets forth, as of the date of this report,these consolidated financial statements, the principal amount outstanding of the registered debt securities issued by Petróleos Mexicanos, and guaranteed by Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals.

Table 2: Registered Debt Securities originally issued by Petróleos Mexicanos

 

Security

 Issuer 

Guarantors

  Principal Amount
Amount
Outstanding
 

8.00% Notes due 2019

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals  U.S. $1,999,369  

9 1/4% Global Guaranteed Bonds due 2018

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   9,296  

9.50% Global Guaranteed Bonds due 2027

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   102,149  

4.875% Notes due 2015

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   1,462,4381,489,718

3.500% Notes due 2018

Petróleos
Mexicanos
Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals999,590

Floating Rate Notes due 2018

Petróleos
Mexicanos
Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals498,570  

6.000% Notes due 2020

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   990,802995,364  

5.50% Notes due 2021

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   2,961,947  

3.500% Notes due 2023

Petróleos
Mexicanos
Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals2,099,730

4.875% Notes due 2024

Petróleos
Mexicanos
Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals999,900

6.625% Notes due 2035

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   998,500

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Security

Issuer

Guarantors

Principal Amount
Outstanding
 

6.500% Bonds due 2041

 Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals   1,229,8803,000,000

4.875% Bonds 2022

Petróleos
Mexicanos
Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals2,097,055

5.50% Bonds due 2044

Petróleos
Mexicanos
Pemex-Exploration and Production, Pemex-Refining and Pemex-Gas and Basic Petrochemicals2,745,000  

The significant differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP, as they affect PEMEX, are described in Note 21. The following tables also present (a) the reconciliation of equity to U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the reconciliation of income to U.S. GAAP for each of the three years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, for each of Petróleos Mexicanos, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries and (b) the reconciliation of equity to U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2010 and the reconciliation of income to U.S. GAAP for each of the two years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for the Master Trust.

Petróleos Mexicanos is the only PEMEX entity that had debt securities registered with the SEC outstanding as of December 31, 20112013 and as of the date of this report,these consolidated financial statements, and all guaranteed debt is issued by Petróleos Mexicanos. The guaranties of the Subsidiary Guarantors are full and unconditional and joint and several. PEMEX’s management has not presented separate financial statements for the Subsidiary Guarantors, because it has determined that such information is not material to investors.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

As of December 31, 20112013

 

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Subsidiary
Guarantors
   Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Eliminations PEMEX
Consolidated
  Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Subsidiary
Guarantors
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations PEMEX
Consolidated
 

ASSETS

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  Ps.93,301,711   Ps.6,065,193    Ps. 17,733,207    Ps.   Ps. 117,100,111   Ps.50,131,405   Ps.5,331,901   Ps.25,282,413   Ps.—     Ps.80,745,719  

Accounts, notes receivable and other, net, and derivative financial instruments

   32,735,905    59,796,746     79,029,048         171,561,699    28,693,366    34,290,219    66,270,066    —      129,253,651  

Accounts receivable—inter-company

   714,912,615    1,221,862,900     131,480,009     (2,068,255,524      383,510,275    821,836,275    96,867,309    (1,302,213,859)    —    

Inventories, net

   491,781    19,268,690     24,391,991         44,152,462  

Available-for-sale investment securities

            24,655,980         24,655,980  

Inventories

  659,252    31,460,831    24,794,417    —      56,914,500  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   841,442,012    1,306,993,529     277,290,235     (2,068,255,524  357,470,252    462,994,298    892,919,226    213,214,205    (1,302,213,859)    266,913,870  

Long-term receivables—inter-company

   642,318,242    1,846,818     2,354,577     (646,519,637      737,649,602    2,938,490    4,687,346    (745,275,438)    —    

Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   305,729,952    4,416,577     8,915,236     (306,148,401  12,913,364  

Investments in equity instruments

  —      —      17,728,571    —      17,728,571  

Permanent investments in associates

  416,044,158    5,971,793    10,791,945    (416,028,395)    16,779,501  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment, net

   8,770,027    1,123,274,039     20,461,614         1,152,505,680    9,666,204    1,670,030,799    41,881,738    —      1,721,578,741  

Deferred taxes

  —      233,872    2,259,290    —      2,493,162  

Restricted cash

  1,620,091    6,081,707    —      —      7,701,798  

Other assets

   2,628,993    3,437,287     4,389,400         10,455,680    1,181,797    10,504,660    2,508,253    —      14,194,710  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  Ps. 1,800,889,226   Ps. 2,439,968,250    Ps. 313,411,062    Ps. (3,020,923,562)   Ps. 1,533,344,976   Ps. 1,629,156,150   Ps. 2,588,680,547   Ps. 293,071,348   Ps. (2,463,517,692)   Ps. 2,047,390,353  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

LIABILITIES

             

Current liabilities:

             

Current portion of long-term debt

  Ps. 80,831,359   Ps. 13,545,476    Ps. 16,120,614    Ps. —   Ps. 110,497,449   Ps.67,909,431   Ps.8,933,827   Ps.13,833,685   Ps.—     Ps.90,676,943  

Accounts payable—inter-company

   1,158,886,384    804,388,900     97,885,325     (2,061,160,609      760,642,526    466,591,441    67,538,205    (1,294,772,172)    —    

Other current liabilities

   11,862,238    96,130,035     34,980,180         142,972,453    18,238,388    127,336,814    22,938,687    —      168,513,889  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   1,251,579,981    914,064,411     148,986,119     (2,061,160,609  253,469,902    846,790,345    602,862,082    104,310,577    (1,294,772,172)    259,190,832  

Long-term debt

   637,940,568    16,046,360     18,288,182         672,275,110    732,584,613    9,294,300    8,684,558    —      750,563,471  

Long-term payables—inter-company

   1,846,818    648,232,190     3,539,802     (653,618,810      2,938,487    744,839,772    4,811,537    (752,589,796)    —    

Reserve for employee benefits, dismantlement and abandonment activities, sundry creditors and others, and deferred tax liability

   104,439,621    621,677,352     75,402,120         801,519,093  

Employee benefits, provisions for sundry creditors, other liabilities and deferred taxes

  232,593,227    871,015,524    119,273,939    —      1,222,882,690  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,995,806,988    2,200,020,313     246,216,223     (2,714,779,419  1,727,264,105    1,814,906,672    2,228,011,678    237,080,611    (2,047,361,968)    2,232,636,993  

EQUITY

   (194,917,762  239,947,937     67,194,839     (306,144,143  (193,919,129  (185,750,522)    360,668,869    55,990,737    (416,155,724)    (185,246,640)  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and equity under Mexican FRS

  Ps. 1,800,889,226   Ps. 2,439,968,250    Ps. 313,411,062    Ps. (3,020,923,562)   Ps. 1,533,344,976  

Total liabilities and equity

 Ps. 1,629,156,150   Ps. 2,588,680,547   Ps. 293,071,348   Ps. (2,463,517,692)   Ps. 2,047,390,353  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION U.S. GAAP RECONCILIATION

STATEMENT OF EQUITY FINANCIAL POSITION

As of December 31, 20112012

 

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Equity under Mexican FRS

  Ps. (194,917,762 Ps. 239,947,937   Ps. 67,194,839   Ps. (306,144,143)   Ps. (193,919,129)  

U.S. GAAP adjustments:

      

Exploration and drilling costs

       8,533,634            8,533,634  

Employee benefits

   2,344,917    26,576,856    201,849        29,123,622  

Effect in equity of employee benefits

   (51,561,078  (79,017,754  (12,384,797      (142,963,629

Accrued vacations

   (202,097  (854,062  (92,358      (1,148,517

Fixed asset adjustments:

      

Capitalized gains in respect of hedging derivative financial instruments, net

       1,231,821            1,231,821  

Capitalization of comprehensive financing result, net

   113,754    (1,307,104  1,746,305        552,955  

Impairment, net

       (15,307,152  (3,258,729      (18,565,881

Derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements

   (4,431,593  (5,202,500  (1,622,309      (11,256,402

Deferred income taxes

   1,839,951    369,770            2,209,721  

Investments in subsidiaries

   (114,135,397          114,135,397      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP adjustments, net

   (166,031,543  (64,976,491  (15,410,039  114,135,397    (132,282,676
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Deficit) equity under U.S. GAAP

  Ps. (360,949,305 Ps. 174,971,446   Ps. 51,784,800   Ps. (192,008,746 Ps. (326,201,805
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

ASSETS

     

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

 Ps.96,787,354   Ps.7,195,766   Ps.15,251,771   Ps.—     Ps.119,234,891  

Accounts, notes receivable and other, net, and derivative financial instruments

  25,234,689    56,823,237    60,001,738    —      142,059,664  

Accounts receivable—inter-company

  326,146,962    845,251,812    130,352,752    (1,301,751,526  —    

Inventories

  659,127    32,301,113    23,887,330    —      56,847,570  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

  448,828,132    941,571,928    229,493,591    (1,301,751,526  318,142,125  

Long-term receivables—inter-company

  652,032,481    2,235,625    2,393,927    (656,662,033  —    

Investments in equity instruments

  1,122,034    —      14,649,225    —      15,771,259  

Permanent investments in associates

  379,828,855    5,142,805    8,063,389    (378,388,786  14,646,263  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  9,460,483    1,607,131,954    42,141,648    —      1,658,734,085  

Deferred taxes

  —      —      1,935,997    —      1,935,997  

Restricted cash

  2,605,332    —      —      —      2,605,332  

Other assets

  1,313,411    7,716,566    3,317,858    —      12,347,835  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

 Ps. 1,495,190,728   Ps. 2,563,798,878   Ps. 301,995,635   Ps. (2,336,802,345 Ps. 2,024,182,896  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

     

Current liabilities:

     

Current portion of long-term debt

 Ps.80,738,221   Ps.12,339,176   Ps.21,163,608   Ps.—     Ps.114,241,005  

Accounts payable—inter-company

  796,677,437    432,690,603    63,356,847    (1,292,724,887  —    

Other current liabilities

  15,456,052    76,281,029    29,825,563    —      121,562,644  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

  892,871,710    521,310,808    114,346,018    (1,292,724,887  235,803,649  

Long-term debt

  647,774,876    11,524,366    13,318,353    —      672,617,595  

Long-term payables—inter-company

  2,235,625    659,364,483    4,098,126    (665,698,234  —    

Employee benefits, provisions for sundry creditors, other liabilities and deferred taxes

  224,072,822    1,024,174,386    138,580,294    —      1,386,827,502  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  1,766,955,033    2,216,374,043    270,342,791    (1,958,423,121  2,295,248,746  

EQUITY

  (271,764,305  347,424,835    31,652,844    (378,379,224  (271,065,850
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 Ps. 1,495,190,728   Ps. 2,563,798,878   Ps. 301,995,635   Ps. (2,336,802,345 Ps. 2,024,182,896  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION As ofCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended December 31, 2010 (Restated Note 3(ab)(i))2013

 

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Master Trust   Subsidiary
Guarantors
   Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

ASSETS

          

Current assets:

          

Cash and cash equivalents

  Ps. 119,143,004   Ps. —    Ps. 4,028,458    Ps. 10,415,617    Ps. —   Ps. 133,587,079  

Accounts, notes receivable and other, net, and derivative financial instruments

   22,817,297    1,456,154     52,313,653     65,217,490         141,804,594  

Accounts receivable—inter-company

   630,670,609    10,213,142     1,133,661,493     129,023,848     (1,903,569,092    

Inventories, net

   218,937         22,255,432     18,044,497         40,518,866  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   772,849,847    11,669,296     1,212,259,036     222,701,452     (1,903,569,092  315,910,539  

Long-term receivables—inter-company

   554,582,569         1,623,531          (556,206,100    

Permanent investments in shares of non-consolidated subsidiaries, affiliates and others

   386,540,118         2,893,550     6,760,108     (385,077,696  11,116,080  

Wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment, net

   8,816,611         1,033,683,586     18,887,704         1,061,387,901  

Other assets

   2,575,973         1,732,962     2,473,125         6,782,060  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  Ps. 1,725,365,118   Ps. 11,669,296    Ps. 2,252,192,665    Ps. 250,822,389    Ps. (2,844,852,888)   Ps. 1,395,196,580  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

          

Current liabilities:

          

Current portion of long-term debt

  Ps. 76,946,263   Ps. —    Ps. 11,720,648    Ps. 887,706    Ps. —   Ps. 89,554,617  

Accounts payable—inter-company

   1,109,439,763    11,243,503     690,146,918     80,874,531     (1,891,704,715    

Other current liabilities

   8,522,137    425,793     85,193,611     23,557,470         117,699,011  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   1,194,908,163    11,669,296     787,061,177     105,319,707     (1,891,704,715  207,253,628  

Long-term debt

   551,292,814         16,278,366     7,599,617         575,170,797  

Long-term payables—inter-company

   1,785,677         563,061,747     3,219,571     (568,066,995    

Reserve for employee benefits, dismantlement and abandonment activities, sundry creditors and others and deferred tax liability

   92,253,241         564,555,000     67,266,025         724,074,266  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,840,239,895    11,669,296     1,930,956,290     183,404,920     (2,459,771,710  1,506,498,691  

EQUITY

   (114,874,777       321,236,375     67,417,469     (385,081,178  (111,302,111
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity under Mexican FRS

  Ps. 1,725,365,118   Ps. 11,669,296    Ps. 2,252,192,665    Ps. 250,822,389    Ps. (2,844,852,888 Ps. 1,395,196,580  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Petróleos Mexicanos  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net sales

 Ps.22,115   Ps. 2,283,326,517   Ps. 1,136,284,419   Ps. (1,821,767,783 Ps. 1,597,865,268  

Services income

  55,361,187    6,305,400    5,394,402    (56,721,632  10,339,357  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total sales revenues

  55,383,302    2,289,631,917    1,141,678,821    (1,878,489,415  1,608,204,625  

Cost of sales

  1,478,302    1,507,556,220    1,126,452,213    (1,821,480,397  814,006,338  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

  53,905,000    782,075,697    15,226,608    (57,009,018  794,198,287  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other (expenses) revenues, net

  (1,629,063  71,323,153    (4,876,023  (291,217  64,526,850  

General expenses:

     

Transportation and distribution expenses

  —      31,612,865    1,276,529 ��  (440,958  32,448,436  

Administrative expenses

  52,176,527    87,089,702    16,332,061    (56,943,818  98,654,472  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total general expenses

  52,176,527    118,702,567    17,608,590    (57,384,776  131,102,908  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

  99,410    734,696,283    (7,258,005  84,541    727,622,229  

Financing cost—Net

  6,745,042    (35,080,491  (1,079,423  (124,940  (29,539,812

Exchange (loss) gain—Net

  (305,581  (3,441,388  (204,523  —      (3,951,492

(Loss) profit sharing in associates

  (173,928,884  1,141,059    (434,349  173,928,884    706,710  

(Loss) income before taxes, duties and other

  (167,390,013  697,315,463    (8,976,300  173,888,485    694,837,635  

Total taxes, duties and other

  2,475,621    858,504,381    3,916,060    —      864,896,062  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year

  (169,865,634  (161,188,918  (12,892,360  173,888,485    (170,058,427
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income

  25,443,543    194,725,595    34,101,029    —      254,270,167  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive result for the year

  Ps. (144,422,091  Ps. 33,536,677    Ps. 21,208,669    Ps. 173,888,485    Ps. 84,211,740  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION U.S. GAAP RECONCILIATION

STATEMENT OF EQUITY As ofCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended December 31, 2010 (Restated Note 3(ab)(i))2012

 

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Equity under Mexican FRS

   Ps. (114,874,777 Ps. 321,236,375   Ps. 67,417,469    Ps. (385,081,178  Ps. (111,302,111

U.S. GAAP adjustments:

      

Exploration and drilling costs

       9,400,346            9,400,346  

Employee benefits

   3,498,443    19,826,642    (198,501      23,126,584  

Effect in equity of employee benefits

   (49,009,014  (88,982,242  (7,945,649      (145,936,905

Accrued vacations

   (191,794  (841,411  (89,559      (1,122,764

Fixed asset adjustments:

      

Capitalized gains in respect of hedging derivative financial instruments, net

       1,342,407            1,342,407  

Capitalization of comprehensive financing result, net

   117,066    (866,559  1,798,296        1,048,803  

Impairment, net

       (5,143,431  (3,394,508      (8,537,939

Derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements

   (1,977,381  6,977,760    (1,281,713      3,718,666  

Deferred income taxes

       380,592            380,592  

Investments in subsidiaries

   (69,017,530          69,017,530      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP adjustments, net

   (116,580,210  (57,905,896  (11,111,634  69,017,530    (116,580,210
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Deficit) equity under U.S. GAAP

   Ps. (231,454,987 Ps. 263,330,479   Ps. 56,305,835    Ps. (316,063,648  Ps. (227,882,321
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net sales

 Ps.16,009   Ps. 2,300,269,835    Ps. 1,257,236,879   Ps. (1,917,786,969 Ps. 1,639,735,754  

Services income

  54,963,056    5,449,622    2,897,419    (56,133,811  7,176,286  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total sales revenues

  54,979,065    2,305,719,457    1,260,134,298    (1,973,920,780  1,646,912,040  

Cost of sales

  1,252,618    1,504,565,221    1,245,083,304    (1,918,410,569  832,490,574  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

  53,726,447    801,154,236    15,050,994    (55,510,211  814,421,466  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other (expenses) revenues, net

  (335,781  210,667,412    (943,530  (369,138  209,018,963  

General expenses:

     

Transportation and distribution expenses

  —      27,623,303    1,189,946    (324,966  28,488,283  

Administrative expenses

  46,788,554    84,409,050    14,277,458    (55,862,213  89,612,849  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total general expenses

  46,788,554    112,032,353    15,467,404    (56,187,179  118,101,132  

Operating income

  6,602,112    899,789,295    (1,359,940  307,830    905,339,297  

Financing cost—Net

  1,492,938    (49,753,710  (1,172,770  (302,858  (49,736,400

Exchange gain (loss) —Net

  5,720,540    38,975,874    149,247    —      44,845,661  

(Loss) profit sharing in associates

  (8,164,817  2,329,571    2,435,880    8,196,973    4,797,607  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes, duties and other

  5,650,773    891,341,030    52,417    8,201,945    905,246,165  

Total taxes, duties and other

  2,817,741    897,843,428    1,984,518    —      902,645,687  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year

  2,833,032    (6,502,398  (1,932,101  8,201,945    2,600,478  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive result

  (60,588,295  (265,515,874  (50,738,806  —      (376,842,975
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive result for the year

 Ps. (57,755,263 Ps. (272,018,272 Ps. (52,670,907 Ps. 8,201,945   Ps. (374,242,497
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF COMPRENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended December 31, 2011

 

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Subsidiary
Guarantors
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations PEMEX
Consolidated
  Petróleos
Mexicanos
 Subsidiary
Guarantors
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net sales

  Ps. 44,905,923   Ps. 2,173,817,756   Ps. 1,240,905,328   Ps. (1,907,465,671 Ps. 1,552,163,336   Ps. 44,905,923   Ps. 2,173,817,756   Ps. 1,240,905,328   Ps. (1,907,465,671 Ps. 1,552,163,336  

Services income

   18,718    4,702,028    2,978,470    (1,433,630  6,265,586   18,718   4,727,223   2,978,470   (1,433,630 6,290,781  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total sales revenues

   44,924,641    2,178,519,784    1,243,883,798    (1,908,899,301  1,558,428,922    44,924,641    2,178,544,979    1,243,883,798    (1,908,899,301  1,558,454,117  

Costs of sales

   1,164,720    1,408,681,816    1,234,194,343    (1,863,415,340  780,625,539  

Cost of sales

  1,164,720    1,408,544,231    1,232,482,760    (1,863,415,340  778,776,371  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross income

   43,759,921    769,837,968    9,689,455    (45,483,961  777,803,383    43,759,921    770,000,748    11,401,038    (45,483,961  779,677,746  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other (expenses) revenues, net

  (2,272,532  184,864,106    7,050,431    (522,144  189,119,861  

General expenses:

           

Transportation and distribution expenses

       30,703,959    1,113,359    (468,307  31,349,011    —      26,091,788    1,086,196    (468,307  26,709,677  

Administrative expenses

   43,878,314    55,699,886    11,139,325    (45,688,478  65,029,047    41,658,446    72,264,326    12,542,526    (45,688,479  80,776,819  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total general expenses

   43,878,314    86,403,845    12,252,684    (46,156,785  96,378,058    41,658,446    98,356,114    13,628,722    (46,156,786  107,486,496  

Operating income

  (171,057  856,508,740    4,822,747    150,681    861,311,111  

Financing cost—Net

  10,473,792    (36,981,642  (6,002,079  (142,044  (32,651,973

Exchange (loss) gain—Net

  (6,279,415  (55,018,846  1,155,009    —      (60,143,252

(Loss) profit sharing in associates

  (110,370,444  (301,689  90,373    109,771,007    (810,753
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income

   (118,393  683,434,123    (2,563,229  672,824    681,425,325  

Other (expenses) revenues, net

   (2,272,750  197,520,332    819,447    (522,145  195,544,884  

Comprehensive financing result (cost) income

   3,667,007    (90,686,045  (4,480,302  (142,046  (91,641,386

Equity participation in subsidiaries

   (92,164,229  (301,689  104,728    91,564,792    (796,398

(Loss) income before taxes, duties and other

  (106,347,124  764,206,563    66,050    109,779,644    767,705,133  

Total taxes, duties and other

  384,791    870,614,032    3,648,567    —      874,647,390  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

(Loss) income before taxes and duties

   (90,888,365  789,966,721    (6,119,356  91,573,425    784,532,425  

Taxes and duties

   384,791    871,999,892    3,631,063        876,015,746  

Net (loss) income for the year

  (106,731,915  (106,407,469  (3,582,517  109,779,644    (106,942,257
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year under Mexican FRS

  Ps. (91,273,156 Ps. (82,033,171 Ps. (9,750,419 Ps. 91,573,425   Ps. (91,483,321

Total comprehensive income

  (7,580,605)    (5,470,555)    6,606,401    —      (6,444,759)  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive result for the year

  Ps. (114,312,520)    Ps. (111,878,024)    Ps. 3,023,884    Ps. 109,779,644    Ps. (113,387,016)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

U.S. GAAP RECONCILIATIONSTATEMENT OF INCOMECASH FLOWS

For the year ended December 31, 20112013

 

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations   PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net (loss) income under Mexican FRS

  Ps. (91,273,156 Ps. (82,033,171 Ps. (9,750,419 Ps. 91,573,425    Ps. (91,483,321

U.S. GAAP adjustments:

       

Exploration and drilling costs

       (866,712           (866,712

Employee benefits

   (1,153,526  6,750,215    400,349         5,997,038  

Accrued vacations, net

   (10,303  (12,652  (2,798       (25,753

Fixed asset adjustments:

                   

Capitalized (losses) in respect of derivative financial instruments, net

       (110,586           (110,586

Capitalization of comprehensive financing result, net

   (3,312  (440,545  (51,991       (495,848

Impairment, net

       (10,163,721  135,779         (10,027,942

(Losses) in respect of derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements, net

   (2,454,212  (12,180,260  (340,596       (14,975,068

Deferred income tax

   1,839,951    (10,822           1,829,129  

Reclassification of Pemex Finance net income to non-controlling interest

           210,166         210,166  

Investments in subsidiaries

   (18,715,255          18,715,255       
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP adjustments, net

   (20,496,657  (17,035,083  350,909    18,715,255     (18,465,576
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year under U.S. GAAP

  Ps. (111,769,813 Ps. (99,068,254 Ps. (9,399,510 Ps. 110,288,680    Ps. (109,948,897
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Operating Activities:

     

Net (loss) income for the year

 Ps. (169,865,634 Ps. (161,188,918 Ps. (12,892,360 Ps. 173,888,485   Ps. (170,058,427

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:

     

Depreciation and amortization

  686,088    145,329,809    2,475,807    —      148,491,704  

Impairment of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  —      26,364,717    (755,882  —      25,608,835  

Unsuccessful wells

  —      12,497,726    —      —      12,497,726  

Disposal of properties, plant and equipment

  24,668    7,744,792    6,930,160    —      14,699,620  

Profit (loss) sharing in associates

  173,258,510    (1,141,058  434,349    (173,258,511  (706,710

Dividends

  —      —      (914,116  —      (914,116

Effects of net present value of reserve for well abandonment

  —      (5,240,305  —      —      (5,240,305

Gain on sale of properties, plant and equipment

  —      —      (768,000  —      (768,000

(Profit) loss on investments in equity instruments

  (278,842  —      —      —      (278,842

Amortization gains related to debt issuance

  (1,037,663  (853,047  —      —      (1,890,710

Unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss)

  2,836,523    (172,772  644,548    —      3,308,299  

Interest expense

  36,108,777    2,077,850    1,117,316    —      39,303,943  

Funds provided by (used in) operating activities:

     

Accounts and notes receivable and derivative financial instruments

  (5,132,196  16,451,312    (4,077,897  —      7,241,219  

Inventories

  (125  840,283    (907,088  —      (66,930

Other assets

  667,515    (14,081,007  507,576    —      (12,905,916

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  1,695,525    57,495,890    (5,219,423  —      53,971,992  

Employee benefits

  34,961,922    36,848,133    6,233,085    —      78,043,140  

Inter-company charges and deductions

  (89,826,553  162,188,266    37,867,036    (110,228,749  —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

  (15,901,485  285,161,671    30,675,111    (109,598,775  190,336,522  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities:

     

Acquisition of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  (916,477  (233,834,924  (10,876,153  —      (245,627,554

Inter-company (increase) decrease investing

  (71,142,378  (111,826,436  —      182,968,814    —    

Investments in equity instruments

  2,869,883    —      —      —      2,869,883  

Exploration costs

  —      (1,438,685  —      —      (1,438,685

Investments in subsidiaries

  (2,066,366  (244,823  2,311,189    —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

  (71,255,338  (347,344,868  (8,564,964  182,968,814    (244,196,356
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities:

     

Loans obtained from financial institutions

  155,545,511     81,409,522    —      236,955,033  

Debt payments, principal only

  (86,279,510  (10,499,109  (94,367,472  —      (191,146,091

Inter-company increase (decrease) financing

  702,864    71,203,090    675,957    (72,581,911  —    

Increase in equity of Subsidiary Entities

  66,583,100    206,288    231,705    (437,993  66,583,100  

Interest paid

  (35,192,692  (1,172,776  (767,632   (37,133,100

Withdrawal of Government contributions

  (65,000,000  581,839    (231,704  (350,135  (65,000,000
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities:

  36,359,273    60,319,332    (13,049,624  (73,370,039  10,258,942  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (50,797,550  (1,863,865  9,060,523    —      (43,600,892

Effects of change in cash value

  4,141,601    —      970,119    —      5,111,720  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

  96,787,354    7,195,766    15,251,771    —      119,234,891  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

 Ps.50,131,405   Ps.5,331,901   Ps.25,282,413   Ps.—     Ps.80,745,719  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF INCOMECASH FLOWS

For the year ended December 31, 2010

(Restated Note 3(ab)(i))2012

 

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net sales

  Ps. 43,476,479   Ps. 1,782,647,360   Ps. 941,180,878   Ps. (1,490,543,699 Ps. 1,276,761,018  

Services income

   22,542    3,469,042    2,784,311    (972,603  5,303,292  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total sales revenues

   43,499,021    1,786,116,402    943,965,189    (1,491,516,302  1,282,064,310  

Costs of sales

   1,234,101    1,135,172,627    941,477,729    (1,446,529,412  631,355,045  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

   42,264,920    650,943,775    2,487,460    (44,986,890  650,709,265  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

General expenses:

      

Transportation and distribution expenses

       32,337,425    936,761        33,274,186  

Administrative expenses

   42,751,480    60,611,608    10,921,400    (43,305,943  70,978,545  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total general expenses

   42,751,480    92,949,033    11,858,161    (43,305,943  104,252,731  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   (486,560  557,994,742    (9,370,701  (1,680,947  546,456,534  

Other (expenses) revenues, net

   531,087    68,602,276    886,258    1,565,907    71,585,528  

Comprehensive financing result (cost) income

   8,561,948    (20,271,247  (368,994  108,955    (11,969,338

Equity participation in subsidiaries

   (54,831,906  565,699    923,129    54,883,766    1,540,688  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income before taxes and duties

   (46,225,431  606,891,470    (7,930,308  54,877,681    607,613,412  

Taxes and duties

   1,019,738    651,465,507    1,655,404        654,140,649  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year under Mexican FRS

  Ps. (47,245,169 Ps. (44,574,037 Ps. (9,585,712 Ps. 54,877,681   Ps. (46,527,237
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Operating Activities:

     

Net income (loss) for the year

 Ps.2,833,032   Ps.(6,502,398 Ps.(1,932,101 Ps.8,201,945   Ps.2,600,478  

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:

     

Depreciation and amortization

  570,890    137,241,770    2,725,060    —      140,537,720  

Unsuccessful wells

  —      13,842,410    —      —      13,842,410  

Disposal of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  68,329    (437,338  1,102,530    —      733,521  

Profit (loss) sharing in associates

  8,434,500    (2,329,571  (2,468,036  (8,434,500  (4,797,607

Dividends

  —      —      (685,704  —      (685,704

Effects of net present value of reserve for well abandonment

  —      3,552,924    —      —      3,552,924  

Amortization expenses related to debt issuance

  1,560,476    —      —      —      1,560,476  

Unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss)

  (40,144,818  (2,266,480  1,849,490    —      (40,561,808

Interest expense

  42,020,763    12,160,731    1,804,544    (10,247,445  45,738,593  

Funds provided by (used in) operating activities:

     

Accounts and notes receivable

  6,288,911    2,944,581    13,364,486    —      22,597,978  

Inventories

  (167,346  (12,228,746  566,674    —      (11,829,418

Other assets

  (489,291  (7,215,184  25,872    —      (7,678,603

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  4,261,846    (20,566,075  2,440,343    —      (13,863,886

Employee benefits

  8,432,015    46,744,724    6,406,528    —      61,583,267  

Inter-company charges and deductions

  (22,322,476  156,037,261    (20,700,257  (113,014,528  —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

  11,346,831    320,978,609    4,499,429    (123,494,528  213,330,341  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities:

     

Acquisition of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  (1,128,811  (192,801,968  (3,578,219  —      (197,508,998

Inter-company (increase) decrease investing

  (9,667,629  (103,341,908  —      113,009,537    —    

Exploration costs

  —      (1,828,043  —      —      (1,828,043
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

  (10,796,440  (297,971,919  (3,578,219  113,009,537    (199,337,041
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities:

     

Loans obtained from financial institutions

  118,081,331    —      259,814,818    —      377,896,149  

Debt payments, principal only

  (70,037,268  (10,914,565  (260,912,130  —      (341,863,963

Inter-company (decrease) increase financing

  —      (8,226  (53,367  61,593    —    

Interest paid

  (42,121,370  (12,231,579  (2,483,557  10,247,440    (46,589,066
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  5,922,693    (23,154,370  (3,634,236  10,309,033    (10,556,880
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  6,473,084    (147,680  (2,713,026  (175,958  3,436,420  

Effects of change in cash value

  (422,540  1,278,252    (209,746  175,958    821,924  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

  90,736,810    6,065,194    18,174,543    —      114,976,547  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

 Ps.96,787,354   Ps.7,195,766   Ps.15,251,771   Ps.—     Ps.119,234,891  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

U.S. GAAP RECONCILIATIONSTATEMENT OF INCOMECASH FLOWS

For the year ended December 31, 2010

(Restated Note 3(ab)(i))2011

 

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net (loss) income under Mexican FRS

  Ps. (47,245,169 Ps. (44,574,037 Ps. (9,585,712 Ps. 54,877,681   Ps. (46,527,237

U.S. GAAP adjustments:

      

Exploration and drilling costs

       (936,520          (936,520

Employee benefits

   (752,350  7,576,734    421,721        7,246,105  

Accrued vacations

   (44,589  (131,380  (12,450      (188,419

Fixed asset adjustments:

      

Capitalized gains (losses) of derivative financial instruments, net

       (110,586          (110,586

Capitalization of comprehensive financing result,
net

   32,260    2,037,093    577,717        2,647,070  

Impairment, net

       12,269,450    141,436        12,410,886  

Gains (losses) in respect of derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements, net

   (1,907,665  10,566,230    33,982        8,692,547  

Deferred income tax

       41,797            41,797  

Reclassification of Pemex Finance net income to non-controlling interest

           217,437        217,437  

Investments in subsidiaries

   32,692,661            (32,692,661    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP adjustments, net

   30,020,317    31,312,818    1,379,843    (32,692,661  30,020,317  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.(17,224,852 Ps.(13,261,219 Ps.(8,205,869 Ps.22,185,020   Ps.(16,506,920
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Master Trust�� Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Operating Activities:

      

Net (loss) income for the year

 Ps. (106,731,915 Ps.—     Ps. (106,407,469 Ps.(3,582,517 Ps. 109,779,644   Ps. (106,942,257

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

      

Depreciation and amortization

  600,028    —      124,727,086    2,053,295    —      127,380,409  

Impairment of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  —      —      (6,855,535  —      —      (6,855,535

Unsuccessful wells

  —      —      12,021,450    —      —      12,021,450  

Disposal of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  149,315    —      10,855,859    (6,320,039  —      4,685,135  

Profits (loss) sharing in associates

  91,888,790    —      301,689    614,035    (91,993,761  810,753  

Dividends

  —      —      —      (599,907  —      (599,907

Effects of net present value of reserve for well abandonment

  —      —      6,598,215    —      —      6,598,215  

Amortization expenses related to debt issuance

  762,387    —      —      —      —      762,387  

Unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss)

  64,713,020    —      2,908,723    1,795,613    —      69,417,356  

Interest expense

  40,704,054    —      5,795,631    1,554,449    (13,223,591  34,830,543  

Derivative financial instruments

  (4,304,124  —      (367,917  4,672,041    —      —    

Funds provided by (used in) operating activities:

      

Accounts and notes receivable and derivative financial instruments

  (3,841,880  1,456,154    (7,517,371  (21,436,816  —      (31,339,913

Inventories

  (272,845  —      1,422,857    (6,900,293  —      (5,750,281

Other assets

  372,713    —      (8,566,926  (1,474,939  —      (9,669,152

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  1,431,412    (425,793  2,202,506    16,816,831    —      20,024,956  

Provisions for sundry creditors

  —      —      2,944,707    —      —      2,944,707  

Employee benefits

  8,812,862    —      36,942,842    5,197,153    —      50,952,857  

Inter-company charges and deductions

  (24,876,137  (1,030,361  21,849,784    12,155,858    (8,099,144  —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

  69,407,680    —      98,856,131    4,544,764    (3,536,852  169,271,723  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities:

      

Acquisition of wells, pipelines, properties, plant and equipment

  (702,978  —      (163,613,569  (2,697,021  —      (167,013,568

Inter-company (increase) decrease investing

  (91,709,068  —      (223,287  —      91,932,355    —    

Exploration costs

  —      —      (4,135,188  —      —      (4,135,188

Investments in subsidiaries

  15,394,390    —      (1,570,769  (15,519,183  (19,088,258  (20,783,820
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

  (77,017,656  —      (169,542,813  (18,216,204  72,844,097    (191,932,576
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities:

      

Loans obtained from financial institutions

  97,714,350    —      —      91,978,669    —      189,693,019  

Debt payments, principal only

  (72,936,610  —      (11,151,706  (68,030,529  —      (152,118,845

Inter-company increase (decrease) financing

  61,142    —      89,361,235    364,423    (89,786,800  —    

Interest paid

  (39,661,962  —      (5,565,988  (1,376,730  13,223,590    (33,381,090
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  (14,823,080  —      72,643,541    22,935,833    (76,563,210  4,193,084  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (22,433,056  —      1,956,859    9,264,393    (7,255,965  (18,467,769

Effects of change in cash value

  (3,686,911  —      79,876    (1,400,969  7,255,965    2,247,961  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

  116,856,777    —      4,028,458    10,311,120    —      131,196,355  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

 Ps.90,736,810   Ps.—     Ps.6,065,193   Ps.18,174,544   Ps.—     Ps.114,976,547  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIALNOTE 26—SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF INCOME

For the year ended December 31, 2009

(Restated Note 3(ab)(i))

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Master
Trust
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net sales

  Ps. 40,548,192   Ps.   Ps. 1,526,860,821   Ps. 753,404,622   Ps. (1,236,183,820 Ps. 1,084,629,815  

Services income

   29,243        3,376,277    2,737,553    (851,557  5,291,516  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total sales revenues

   40,577,435        1,530,237,098    756,142,175    (1,237,035,377  1,089,921,331  

Costs of sales

   191,627        1,000,656,130    755,603,210    (1,195,608,184  560,842,783  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross income

   40,385,808        529,580,968    538,965    (41,427,193  529,078,548  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

General expenses:

       

Transportation and distribution expenses

           31,224,679    1,101,889    (470,371  31,856,197  

Administrative expenses

   40,294,179        56,416,245    12,426,117    (40,483,738  68,652,803  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total general expenses

   40,294,179        87,640,924    13,528,006    (40,954,109  100,509,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   91,629     441,940,045    (12,989,041  (473,084  428,569,548  

Other (expenses) revenues, net

   (322,582  (4,383  37,289,973    2,320,071    485,680    39,768,759  

Comprehensive financing result (cost) income

   9,837,377    4,383    (25,186,611  36,984        (15,307,867

Equity participation in subsidiaries

   (102,142,599      524,259    (1,363,510  102,214,622    (767,228
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income before taxes and duties

   (92,536,175      454,567,665    (11,995,496  102,227,218    452,263,212  

Taxes and duties

   1,965,559        542,599,013    2,068,486        546,633,058  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year under Mexican FRS

  Ps.(94,501,734 Ps.   Ps.(88,031,348 Ps.(14,063,982 Ps.102,227,218   Ps.(94,369,846
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES ON OIL AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010GAS EXPLORATION AND 2009PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED):

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

U.S. GAAP RECONCILIATION OF INCOME

For the year ended December 31, 2009

(Restated Note 3(ab)(i))

   Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Net (loss) income under Mexican FRS

  Ps. (94,501,734 Ps. (88,031,348 Ps. (14,063,982 Ps. 102,227,218   Ps. (94,369,846

U.S. GAAP adjustments:

      

Exploration and drilling costs

       (1,016,089          (1,016,089

Employee benefits

   2,574,775    20,288,904    4,972,493        27,836,172  

Accrued vacations

   (32,918  (113,079  (9,407      (155,404

Fixed asset adjustments:

      

Capitalized gains (losses) of derivative financial instruments, net

       (110,586          (110,586

Capitalization of comprehensive financing result, net

   21,910    2,284,427    395,037        2,701,374  

Impairment, net

       2,266,597    147,331        2,413,928  

Gains (losses) in respect of derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements, net

   (2,831,249  14,361,161    (1,315,695      10,214,217  

Deferred income tax

       46,014            46,014  

Reclassification of Pemex Finance net income to non-controlling interest

           160,285        160,285  

Investments in subsidiaries

   42,357,393            (42,357,393    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total U.S. GAAP adjustments, net

   42,089,911    38,007,349    4,350,044    (42,357,393  42,089,911  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for the year under U.S. GAAP

  Ps.(52,411,823 Ps.(50,023,999 Ps.(9,713,938 Ps.59,869,825   Ps.(52,279,935
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended December 31, 2011

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Master
Trust
  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Operating activities:

      

Net (loss) income for the year before taxes, duties and other charges

 Ps. (90,888,365 Ps.   Ps.789,966,721   Ps.(6,119,356 Ps.91,573,425    Ps. 784,532,425  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

      

Depreciation and amortization

  600,028        95,958,328    1,194,663        97,753,019  

Impairment of fixed assets

          (11,689,832          (11,689,832

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

  64,713,020        7,891,540    1,795,613        74,400,173  

Interest expense

  40,704,054        5,795,631    1,554,449    (13,223,591  34,830,543  

Profit sharing in subsidiaries, affiliates and others

  92,593,194        301,689    (104,728  (91,993,757  796,398  

Derivative financial instruments

  (1,586,990      (339,730  4,305,275        2,378,555  

Received dividends

              (599,907      (599,907

Unsuccessful wells

          12,021,450            12,021,450  

Disposal of fixed assets

  149,533        3,436,280    (89,055      3,496,758  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

      

Accounts and notes receivable and derivative financial instruments

  (6,031,644  1,456,154    (7,168,136  (21,436,816      (33,180,442

Inter-company changes and deductions

  (24,876,137  (1,030,361  21,849,784    12,155,841    (8,099,127    

Inventories

  (272,844      3,477,528    (6,838,280      (3,633,596

Other assets

  (53,018      (1,704,326  (1,916,275      (3,673,619

Pensions, seniority premiums and other post-retirement benefits

  11,032,730        52,304,179    6,315,025        69,651,934  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  1,809,008    (425,793  (864,311,478  13,165,073    (18  (849,763,208
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

  87,892,569        107,789,628    3,381,522    (21,743,068  177,320,651  

Investing activities:

      

Increase in fixed assets, net

  (702,978      (172,467,190  (2,679,518      (175,849,686

Inter-company decrease (increase) in investments

  (91,709,068      (223,287      91,932,355      

Exploration and drilling costs

          (4,135,188          (4,135,188

Received dividends

              599,907        599,907  

Investments in subsidiaries

  (2,811,825      (1,570,769  (15,519,184  (882,042  (20,783,820
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

  (95,223,871      (178,396,434  (17,598,795  91,050,313    (200,168,787

Financing activities:

      

Proceeds from long-term financing

  97,714,350            91,978,668        189,693,018  

Financing payments

  (72,936,610      (11,151,706  (68,030,529      (152,118,845

Inter-company (decrease) increase in financing

  61,142        89,361,235    364,423    (89,786,800    

Interest payments

  (39,661,962      (5,565,988  (1,376,730  13,223,590    (33,381,090
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  (14,823,080      72,643,541    22,935,832    (76,563,210  4,193,083  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (22,154,382      2,036,735    8,718,559    (7,255,965  (18,655,053

Effects of change in cash value

  (3,686,911          (1,400,969  7,255,965    2,168,085  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

  119,143,004        4,028,458    10,415,617        133,587,079  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period under Mexican FRS

 Ps.93,301,711   Ps.   Ps.6,065,193   Ps.17,733,207   Ps.    Ps. 117,100,111  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended December 31, 2010

(Restated Note 3(ab)(i))

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Master Trust  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Operating activities:

      

Net (loss) income for the year before taxes, duties and other charges

 Ps. (46,225,431 Ps.   Ps. 606,891,470   Ps. (7,930,308 Ps. 54,877,681    Ps. 607,613,412  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

      

Depreciation and amortization

  633,480        94,682,473    1,165,828        96,481,781  

Impairment of fixed assets

          9,958,603            9,958,603  

Properties

  166,287        2,161,892    746,289        3,074,468  

Foreign exchange loss

  (26,895,062      (2,061,406  (817,940      (29,774,408

Profit sharing in subsidiaries

  54,838,184        (143,187  (923,130  (55,312,555  (1,540,688

Interest expense

  63,459,978    3,500,891    13,775,575    1,239,789    (42,272,333  39,703,900  

Derivatives financial instruments

  (2,144,590  4,172,775    (2,936,798  2,804,344        1,895,731  

Unsuccessful wells

          11,619,243            11,619,243  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

      

Accounts and notes receivable and derivative financial instruments

  (20,985,045  14,683,936    21,751,735    (11,490,247      3,960,379  

Inter-company changes and deductions

  383,440    (18,723,247  (378,687,033  28,181,245    368,845,595      

Inventories

  97,634        (3,736,779  1,569,293        (2,069,852

Other assets

  (617,532      109,033    (1,286,973      (1,795,472

Pensions, seniority premiums and other post-retirement benefits

  11,572,967        65,435,900    8,155,264        85,164,131  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  3,759,097    (136,629  (651,521,778  (10,353,242      (658,252,552
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

  38,043,407    3,497,726    (212,701,057  11,060,212    326,138,388    166,038,676  

Investing activities:

      

Increase in fixed assets, net

  (335,764      (182,084,993  (2,163,719      (184,584,476

Inter-company decrease (increase) in investments

  (30,747,853      377,538,224    (8,436,537  (338,353,834    

Exploration and drilling costs

          (6,343,062          (6,343,062

Investments in subsidiaries

  (16,372,433      (546,836  454,048    16,465,221      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

  (47,456,050      188,563,333    (10,146,208  (321,888,613  (190,927,538

Financing activities:

      

Proceeds from long-term financing

  174,306,971            61,574,962        235,881,933  

Financing payments

  (118,712,365      (10,181,060  (68,205,033      (197,098,458

Inter-company (decrease) increase in financing

  644,739        32,265,781    (306,538  (32,603,982    

Increase in equity

          122            122  

Interest payments

  (62,760,179  (3,500,891  (13,525,268  (1,208,576  42,272,333    (38,722,581

Increase in equity from inter-company contribution

          13,949,000    1,924,000    (15,873,000    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  (6,520,834  (3,500,891  22,508,575    (6,221,185  (6,204,649  61,016  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (15,933,477  (3,165  (1,629,149  (5,307,180  (1,954,875  (24,827,846

Effects of change in cash value

  (1,052,636          (2,247,630  1,954,875    (1,345,391

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

  136,129,117    3,165    5,657,607    17,970,427        159,760,316  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period under Mexican FRS

 Ps. 119,143,004   Ps.   Ps. 4,028,458   Ps. 10,415,617   Ps.    Ps. 133,587,079  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended December 31, 2009

(Restated Note 3(ab)(i))

  Petróleos
Mexicanos
  Master Trust  Subsidiary
Guarantors
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  PEMEX
Consolidated
 

Operating activities:

      

Net (loss) income for the year before taxes, duties and other charges

  Ps.  (92,536,175 Ps.   Ps. 454,567,665    Ps.  (11,995,496 Ps. 102,227,218    Ps. 452,263,212  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

      

Depreciation and amortization

  673,638        75,074,340    1,142,709        76,890,687  

Disposal of fixed assets

  158,118        749,646    40,961        948,725  

Impairment of fixed assets

          1,731,229            1,731,229  

Foreign exchange loss

  (16,827,273      (665,133  (1,622,078      (19,114,486

Profit sharing in subsidiaries

  102,155,193        (524,259  1,363,513    (102,227,219  767,228  

Interest expense

  51,881,945        15,818,568    1,600,191    (19,882,766  49,417,938  

Financial instruments

  (3,649,625  (5,905,280  (5,570,061  5,161,225        (9,963,741

Unsuccessful wells

          15,124,465            15,124,465  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

      

Accounts and notes receivable and derivative financial instruments

  84,182,722    (12,476,251  (43,787,677  (36,194,185      (8,275,391

Inter-company changes and deductions

  66,878,071    10,214,034    642,848,687    51,339,927    (771,280,719    

Inventories

  6,556    27,967    34,488,557    (6,246,756      28,276,324  

Other assets

  (1,067,615  1,717,073    500,159    10,170,203        11,319,820  

Pensions, seniority premiums and other post-retirement benefits

  11,822,461        60,749,584    8,545,346        81,117,391  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  (2,278,548  (12,159,152  (467,448,133  6,255,187        (475,630,645
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

  201,399,468    (18,581,609  783,657,637    29,560,746    (791,163,486  204,872,756  

Investing activities:

      

Increase in fixed assets, net

  (552,001      (207,062,724  (2,642,879  (2,974,534  (213,232,138

Exploration and drilling costs

          (1,189,944          (1,189,944

Inter-company decrease (increase) in investments

  711,507,677    826,019,534    (263,290,103  15,295,510    (1,289,532,619    

Investments in subsidiaries

  (15,055,950      (263,610  896,901    14,422,659      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

  695,899,727    826,019,534    (471,806,381  13,549,532    (1,278,084,494  (214,422,082

Financing activities:

      

Proceeds from long-term financing

  159,607,538        570,048            160,177,586  

Financing payments

  (90,551,804      (2,635,574  (6,420,119      (99,607,497

Inter-company (decrease) increase in financing

  (900,820,676  (811,594,167  (309,629,835  (42,402,632  2,064,447,310      

Increase in equity

  (27,502      494,416    296        467,210  

Interest payments

  (51,537,064      (15,818,568  (1,600,191  19,882,766    (49,073,057

Increase in equity from inter-company contribution

          15,082,096        (15,082,096    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  (883,329,510  (811,594,167  (311,937,416  (50,422,645  2,069,247,980    11,964,242  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  13,969,685    (4,156,242  (86,160  (7,312,367      2,414,916  

Effects of changes in cash value

  (2,060,116      524,259            (1,535,857

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

  124,219,548    4,159,407    5,219,508    25,282,794        158,881,257  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period under Mexican FRS

  Ps. 136,129,116   Ps.3,165   Ps. 5,657,607    Ps.   17,970,427   Ps.    Ps. 159,760,316  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

NOTE 23—SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED):

Effective January 1, 2010, certain of the SEC’s rules were revised in order to modernize the reporting requirements applicable to oil and gas companies such as PEMEX in respect of oil and other hydrocarbon reserves. The most significant of these revisions include the following:

 

  

Crude oil pricesprices.. Evaluation of the economic producibility of reserves and discounted cash flows must each be based on a 12-month average crude oil price that is calculated by using the price on the first day of each month during the period, unless contractual arrangements designate a different price to be used.

 

  

Proved undeveloped reservesreserves.. Reserves may be classified as proved undeveloped reserves if: (1) there is a high degree of confidence that the relevant quantities of such reserves will be recovered; and (2) the related drilling is scheduled to begin within the next five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.

 

  

Reserves estimation using new technologiestechnologies.. Reserves may be estimated through the use of reliable advanced technologies in addition to those, such as flow tests and production history, previously recognized by the SEC.

 

  

Reserves estimation personnel and processprocess.. Additional disclosure is required regarding the qualifications of those who oversee a company’s reserves estimation process. A general discussion of the internal controls used to assure the objectivity of reserves estimates is also now required.

There has been no material change in Mexico’s proved reserves as a result of the application of these revised SEC rules.

The following tables provide supplementary information on the oil and gas exploration, development and production activities of Pemex-Exploration and Production in compliance with the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic932-10-5 “Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas” (“ASC Topic 932932”) and ASUAccounting Standards Update 2010-03.

All exploration and production activities of Pemex-Exploration and Production are conducted in Mexico.

The supplemental data presented herein reflect information for all of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s oil and gas producing activities. Capitalized costs and results of operations presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Capitalized costs for oil and gas producing activities (unaudited):

 

   As of December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Proved properties

  Ps. 1,545,626,359   Ps. 1,399,218,514   Ps. 1,247,025,452  

Construction in progress

   54,255,040    50,712,384    49,511,782  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (724,592,750  (646,297,200  (581,259,886
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net capitalized costs

  Ps.875,288,649   Ps.803,633,698   Ps.715,277,348  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
(a)Capitalized costs for oil and gas producing activities (unaudited)

   As of December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

Proved properties

  Ps. 2,254,784,515   Ps. 2,108,592,519   Ps. 1,921,817,651  

Construction in progress

   83,764,607    46,908,049    54,255,040  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (994,476,861  (870,694,075  (756,353,372
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net capitalized costs

  Ps. 1,344,072,261   Ps. 1,284,806,493   Ps. 1,219,719,319  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

Costs incurred for oil and gas property exploration and development activities (unaudited):

(b)Costs incurred for oil and gas property exploration and development activities (unaudited)

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2011   2010   2009   2013   2012 

Exploration

  Ps. 32,765,335    Ps. 29,472,837    Ps. 30,914,261    Ps. 36,552,489    Ps. 33,345,223  

Development

   131,114,962     150,439,682     151,478,371     181,671,933     158,425,613  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total costs incurred

  Ps. 163,880,297    Ps. 179,912,519    Ps. 182,392,632    Ps. 218,224,422    Ps. 191,770,836  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

There are no property acquisition costs, because PEMEX exploits oil reserves owned by the Mexican nation.

Exploration costs include costs of geological and geophysical studies of fields amounting to Ps. 13,725,400, Ps. 11,619,24310,163,605 and Ps. 10,120,99111,978,531 for 2011, 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively, that, in accordance with the successful efforts method of accounting, are accounted for as geological and geophysical exploration expenses.

Development costs include those costs incurred in obtaining access to proved reserves and providing facilities for extracting, treating, gathering and storing oil and gas.

Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities (unaudited):

(c)Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities (unaudited):

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2011   2010   2009   2013   2012   2011 

Revenues from sale of oil and gas

  Ps. 1,270,832,133    Ps. 979,542,920    Ps. 828,658,256    Ps. 1,250,737,299    Ps. 1,333,247,872    Ps. 1,270,832,133  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Hydrocarbon duties

   871,471,372     649,740,909     537,911,164     856,978,971     898,064,551     871,471,372  

Production costs (excluding taxes)

   121,020,712     99,855,823     95,396,773     134,645,739     121,973,668     103,250,426  

Other costs and expenses

   26,632,385     33,010,856     37,263,816     40,599,327     30,828,632     30,676,623  

Exploration expenses

   25,746,851     20,943,354     25,245,456     22,661,332     25,820,942     25,746,850  

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion

   82,421,552     82,640,939     61,869,294     119,161,541     122,356,141     107,385,238  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
   1,127,292,872     886,191,880     757,686,503     1,174,046,910     1,199,043,934     1,138,530,509  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities

  Ps.143,539,261    Ps.93,351,040    Ps.70,971,753    Ps.76,690,389    Ps.134,203,938    Ps.132,301,624  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Crude oil and natural gas reserves:

 

(d)A.Sales prices (unaudited)

The following table summarizes average sales prices in U.S. dollars as of December 31 (excluding production taxes):

 

  2011   2010   2009   2013   2012   2011 

Weighted average sales price per barrel of oil equivalent (boe)(1)

  U.S. $80.41    U.S.$58.49    U.S. $46.64  

Weighted average sales price per barrel of oil equivalent (boe)(1)

  U.S.$76.81    U.S.$78.89    U.S.$80.41  

Crude oil, per barrel

   100.01     72.25     55.41     99.92     102.36     100.01  

Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet

   4.68     4.52     4.06     4.93     4.03     4.68  

 

(1)To convert dry gas to barrels of oil equivalent, a factor of 5.201 thousand cubic feet of dry gas per barrel of oil equivalent is used.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

(e)B.Crude oil and natural gas reserves (unaudited)

Under the PoliticalMexican Constitution of the United Mexican States and the Regulatory Law, all oil and other hydrocarbon reserves withinlocated in the subsoil of Mexico are owned by the Mexican nation and not by us. UnderPEMEX. As of the Petróleos Mexicanos Law,date of these consolidated financial statements, Pemex-Exploration and Production hashad the exclusive right to extract, but not own, these reserves, and to sell the resulting production. The exploration and development activities of Petróleos Mexicanos and the subsidiary entitiesSubsidiary Entities are limited to reserves located in Mexico.

Proved oil and natural gas reserves are those estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations.

Proved reserves estimates as of December 31, 20112013 were prepared by Pemex-Exploration and Production and were reviewed by the Independent Engineering Firms (as defined below), which audit the hydrocarbonsPemex-Exploration and Production’s hydrocarbon reserves. In addition, pursuant to the Regulatory Law, theComisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos (National Hydrocarbons Commission, or the “NHC”) NHC reviewed and approved the proved reserves reports estimates as of December 31, 20112013 provided by Pemex-Exploration and Production. TheProduction on March 11, 2014. These reserves estimates were then registered and published by theSecretaría de Energía (Ministry Ministry of Energy).Energy on March 18, 2014.

Pemex-Exploration and Production estimates Mexico’s reserves based on generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation methods and procedures.procedures, which are based primarily on applicable SEC regulations and, as necessary, the SPE’s publication entitled Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information, dated February 19, 2007 and other SPE publications, including the SPE’s publication entitled Petroleum Resources Management System, as well as other technical sources, including Estimation and Classification of Reserves of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Condensate, by Chapman Cronquist, and Determination of Oil and Gas Reserves, Petroleum Society Monograph Number 1, published by the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy & Petroleum. The choice of method or combination of methods employed in the analysis of each reservoir is determined by:

 

experience in the area;

 

stage of development;

 

quality and completeness of basic data; and

 

production and pressure histories.

Reserves data set forth herein represent only estimates. Reserves valuation is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of any reserves estimate depends on the quality of available data, engineering and geological interpretation and professional judgment. As a result, estimates of different engineers may vary. In addition, the results of drilling, testing and producing subsequent to the date of an estimate may lead to the revision of an estimate.

During 2011,2013, PEMEX did not record any material increase in Mexico’s hydrocarbons reserves as a result of the use of new technologies.

In order to ensure the reliability of itsPEMEX’s reserves estimation efforts, PEMEXit has undertaken the internal certification of its estimates of Mexico’s reserves since 1996. PEMEX has established certain internal controls in connection with the preparation of its proved reserves estimates. Initially, teams of geoscientists from

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Pemex-Exploration and Production’s exploration and exploitation business units (with each of these units covering several projects) prepare the reserves estimates, using distinct estimation processes for valuations relating to new discoveries and developed fields, respectively. Subsequently, the regional reserves offices collect these reserves estimates from the units and request the review and certification of such valuations and the booking of the related

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

reserves from theGerencia de Recursos y Reservas(Office (Office of Resources and Reserves), the central hydrocarbon reserves management body of Pemex-Exploration and Production. This internal certification process is undertaken in accordance with internal guidelines for estimating and classifying proved reserves, which are based on the SEC’s rules and definitions. The Hydrocarbons Reserves and Resources Management Office, which additionally oversees and conducts an internal audit of the above process, consists entirely of professionals with geological, geophysical, petrophysical and reservoir engineering backgrounds. The engineers who participate in PEMEX’s reserves estimation process are experienced in: reservoir numerical simulation; well drilling and completion; pressure, volume and temperature (“PVT”)(PVT) analysis; NODALTMNODALTM (an analytical tool used in forecasting the performance of the various elements comprising the production system) analysis; and design strategies in petroleum field development. Furthermore, all of thesePEMEX’s personnel have been certified by theSecretaría de Educación Pública(Ministry (Ministry of Public Education), most have earned master’s degrees in areas of study such as petroleum engineering, geology and geophysical engineering and they possess an average of over ten years of professional experience.

In addition to the above internal review process, Pemex-Exploration and Production’s final reserves estimates are audited by independent engineering firms. Three independent engineering firms auditedPemex-Exploration and Production’s estimates of Mexico’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2011:2013: Netherland Sewell International, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Netherland Sewell”); DeGolyer and MacNaughton (“D&M”);MacNaughton; and Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (“Ryder Scott,” and together with Netherland Sewell and D&M,DeGolyer and MacNaughton, the “Independent Engineering Firms”). The reserves estimates reviewed by the Independent Engineering Firms totaled 98.9%99.3% of Mexico’s reserves. The remaining 1.1%0.7% of reserves consisted of reserves located in certain areas in which third parties provide drilling services to Pemex-Exploration and Production. Netherland Sewell reviewed the reserves in the Northeastern Marine region and Southern region, D&M reviewed the reserves in the Southwestern Marine region, and Ryder Scott reviewed the reserves in the Northern region. Under such agreements, the corresponding third party is responsible for assessing the volume of reserves. Netherland Sewell audited the reserves in the Northeastern Marine region and Southern region, DeGolyer and MacNaughton audited the reserves in the Southwestern Marine region and Ryder Scott audited the reserves in the Northern region. The audits conducted by the Independent Engineering Firms consisted primarily of: (1) analysis of historical static and dynamic reservoir data provided by Pemex-Exploration and Production; (2) construction or updating of the Independent Engineering Firms’ own static and dynamic reservoir characterization models of Mexican oil fields; (3) economic analysis of selected fields; and (4) review ofPemex-Exploration and Production’s production forecasts and reserves estimates.

Since reserves estimates are, by definition, only estimates, they cannot be reviewed for the purpose of verifying exactness. Instead, the Independent Engineering Firms conducted a detailed review of Pemex-Exploration and Production’s reserves estimates so that they could express an opinion as to whether, in the aggregate, the reserves estimates that Pemex-Exploration and ProductionPEMEX furnished were reasonable and had been estimated and presented in conformity with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation methods and procedures.

All questions, including any suggested modifications to proved reserves estimates, that arose during the Independent Engineering Firms’ review process were resolved by Pemex-Exploration and Production to the satisfaction of the Independent Engineering Firms. The Independent Engineering Firms have concluded that thePEMEX’s estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserve volumes set forth belowas of December 31, 2013 are, in the aggregate, reasonable and have been prepared in accordance with Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the SEC, as amended (“Rule 4-10(a)”), are consistent with international reserves reporting practice and are in accordance with the revised oil and gas reserves disclosure provisions of ASC Topic 932.

Mexico’s total proved developed and undeveloped reserves of crude oil, condensates and liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable from field processing plants decreased by 0.3%3.0% in 2011,2013, from 11,39411,424 million barrels at December 31, 2012 to 11,079 million barrels at December 31, 2013. Mexico’s proved developed reserves of crude

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

December 31, 2010 to 11,362 million barrels at December 31, 2011. Mexico’s proved developed reserves of crude oil, condensates and liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable from processing plants decreased by 2.2%5.5% in 2011,2013, from 7,7937,790 million barrels at December 31, 20102012 to 7,6187,360 million barrels at December 31, 2011.2013. These decreases were principally due to decreased crude oilfewer positive revisions to PEMEX’s reserves estimates in 2013, as well as a decrease in extensions and condensates production during 2011, which was largely offset bydiscoveries, particularly in connection with the decrease in field development activities that ledat the Aceite Terciario del Golfo (“ATG”) project, where the dismantling of four field laboratories resulted in a decrease in the number of wells completed, and the decrease in the number of exploratory activities carried out in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico. The amount of crude oil, condensate and liquefiable hydrocarbon reserves added in 2013 was insufficient to reclassifications from proved undeveloped, probableoffset the level of production in 2013, which amounted to 1,037 million barrels of crude oil, condensates and possible reserves to proved developed reserves, as well as exploratory additions, as described below.liquefiable hydrocarbons.

Mexico’s total proved developed and undeveloped dry gas reserves increaseddecreased by 1.9%3.5% in 2011,2013, from 12,49412,713 billion cubic feet at December 31, 20102012 to 12,73412,273 billion cubic feet at December 31, 2011.2013. Mexico’s proved developed dry gas reserves increaseddecreased by 0.2%6.2% in 2011,2013, from 7,9417,951 billion cubic feet at December 31, 20102012 to 7,9577,461 billion cubic feet at December 31, 2011.2013. This decrease was principally due to the level of production during 2013, which amounted to 1,539 billion cubic feet of dry gas. The amount of dry gas reserves added in 2013 was insufficient to offset the level of production in 2013, which amounted to 1,539 billion cubic feet of dry gas. Mexico’s proved undeveloped dry gas reserves increased by 4.9%1.0% in 2011,2013, from 4,5534,762 billion cubic feet at December 31, 20102012 to 4,7764,811 billion cubic feet at December 31, 2011. The above increases were principally2013. This increase was primarily due to field development activities in the Burgos basin.and Veracruz basins.

Due to various field development activities performed during 2011, 1,118.4During 2013, 903.4 million barrels of oil equivalent were reclassified from proved undeveloped, probable and possible reserves to proved developed reserves, at a cost of Ps. 145,926 million.181,670,000. The only fieldfields containing material volumes of Mexico’s proved reserves that hashave remained undeveloped for five years or more isare the Ayatsil, Ayín field. The Ayín field remainsand Alux fields, which are all located offshore. These fields remain undeveloped due to a lackdelays in construction related to certain unique field characteristics. In particular, the design of infrastructure. Thethe development plan for the Ayatsil field, the largest of the three, has required additional time due to the complexity of this project, which is expected to represent Pemex-Exploration and Production’s first offshore project producing extra-heavy crude oil. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, three drilling platforms have been installed at the Ayatsil field and drilling activity is expected to begin in 2013, when the infrastructure necessary for its development is schedulednear future. PEMEX also expects to be completed.continue to develop the Ayín and Alux fields during 2014.

The following three tables of crude oil and dry gas reserves set forth PEMEX’s estimates of Mexico’s proved crude oil and dry gas reserves determined in accordance with Rule 4-10(a).

Summary of Oil and Gas(1) Proved Reserves as of December 31, 2011

2013 Based on Average Fiscal Year Prices

 

  Crude Oil and Condensates(2)   Dry  Gas(3)   Crude Oil and Condensates(2)   Dry Gas(3) 
  (in millions of barrels)   (in billions of cubic feet)   (in millions of barrels)   (in billions of cubic feet) 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

    

Proved developed reserves

   7,618     7,957  

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves Proved developed reserves

   7,360     7,461  

Proved undeveloped reserves

   3,744     4,776     3,719     4,812  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total proved reserves

   11,362     12,734     11,079     12,273  
  

 

   

 

 

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.

Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding.

(1)PEMEX does not currently produce synthetic oil or synthetic gas, or other natural resources from which synthetic oil or synthetic gas can be produced.
(2)Crude oil and condensate reserves include the fraction of liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable in natural gas processing plants located at fields.
(3)Reserve volumes reported in this table are volumes of dry gas, although natural gas production reported in other tables refers to sour wet gas. There is a shrinkage in volume when natural gas liquids and impurities are extracted to obtain dry gas. Therefore, reported natural gas volumes are greater than dry gas volumes.
Source:Pemex-Exploration and Production.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

 

Crude Oil and Condensate Reserves

(including natural gas liquids)((1)1)

 

  2011 2010 2009   2011 2012 2013 
  (in millions of barrels)   (in millions of barrels) 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

    

At January 1

   11,394    11,691    11,865     11,394   11,362   11,424  

Revisions(2)

   824    515    577     824   1,012   630  

Extensions and discoveries

   194    246    311     194   103   62  

Production

   (1,050  (1,059  (1,062   (1,050 (1,053 (1,037
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   11,362    11,394    11,691     11,362    11,424    11,079  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Proved developed reserves at December 31

   7,618    7,793    8,167     7,618    7,790    7,360  

Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31

   3,744    3,601    3,524     3,744    3,634    3,719  

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Crude oil and condensate reserves include the fraction of liquefiable hydrocarbons recoverable in natural gas processing plants located at fields.
(2)Revisions include positive and negative changes due to new data from well drilling, and revisions made when actual reservoir performance differs from expected performance.
SourceSource::Pemex-Exploration and ProductionProduction..

Dry Gas Reserves

 

  2011 2010 2009   2011 2012 2013 
  (in billions of cubic feet)   (in billions of cubic feet) 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves

      

At January 1

   12,494    11,966    12,702     12,494   12,734   12,713  

Revisions(1)

   1,592    1,449    504     1,592   1,377   1,010  

Extensions and discoveries

   249    770    404     249   162   89  

Production(2)

   (1,601  (1,691  (1,644   (1,601 (1,560 (1,539
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   12,734    12,494    11,966     12,734    12,713    12,273  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Proved developed reserves at December 31

   7,957    7,941    7,586     7,958    7,951    7,461  

Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31

   4,776    4,553    4,380     4,776    4,762    4,811  

 

Note:Numbers may not total due to rounding.
(1)Revisions include positive and negative changes due to new data from well drilling, and revisions made when actual reservoir performance differs from expected performance.
(2)Production refers here to dry gas, although natural gas production reported in other tables refers to sour wet gas. There is a shrinkage in volume when natural gas liquids and impurities are extracted to obtain dry gas. Therefore, reported natural gas volumes are greater than dry gas volumes.
Source:Pemex-Exploration and Production.

Based on reservoir performance, new informationPemex-Exploration and discoveries and production during 2011,Production’s reserves replacement rate (“RRR”) for a given period is calculated by dividing the sum of proved reserves additions due to discoveries, developments, delineations and revisions by that period’s total production. In 2013, the RRR was 67.8%, which was 36.5 percentage points lower than the 2012 RRR of crude oil, natural gas, condensates104.3%. The fact that the reserves replacement rate was less than 100% in 2013 represents a decline in Mexico’s proved reserves during this period. This decrease in the RRR was mainly due to a significant decrease in the amount of proved reserves that were added as a result of discoveries, extensions and liquefiable hydrocarbons for all regions as of December 31, 2011 were estimated to be 13,810.3 million barrels of oil equivalent,positive revisions in 2013 as compared to 13,796.0 million barrels2012. Specifically, lower levels of oil equivalent at December 31, 2010.field development activities in the ATG

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 AND 20092011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

project as well as the decrease in the number of exploratory activities carried out in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, where the lack of infrastructure precluded PEMEX from booking proved reserves, contributed to the decrease in RRR in 2013.

PEMEX’s goal is to increase its RRR during 2014, in part by increasing Mexico’s proved reserves over the coming years. PEMEX aims to accomplish this primarily through development of the Ku-Maloob-Zaap, Crudo Ligero Marino and ATG projects, as well as through the performance of delineation activities. PEMEX has developed these objectives based on reserves estimates, which are subject to the uncertainty and risks associated with hydrocarbon exploration and production activities. Additionally, future decisions regarding authorized exploration and exploitation investment levels may lead to related changes.

PEMEX’s reserves production ratio, which is presented in terms of years, is calculated by dividing the estimated remaining reserves at the end of the relevant year by the total production of hydrocarbons for that year. As of December 31, 2013, this ratio was equal to 10.1 years for proved reserves, which represents a decrease of 1.0% as compared to the 2012 reserves production ratio of 10.2 years for proved reserves.

 

(f)C.Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves (unaudited)

The standardized measure tables presented below relate to proved oil and gas reserves excluding proved reserves scheduled to be produced after the year 2036.2038. This measure is presented in accordance with the revised oil and gas reserves disclosure provisions ofASC Topic 932.

Estimated future cash inflows from production are computed by applying average prices of oil and gas of the first day December 2011.of each month of 2013. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures needed to develop and produce the year-end estimated proved reserves after a net cash flows discount factor of 10%, assuming constant year-end economic conditions.

Future tax expenses are computed by applying the appropriate year-end statutory tax rates with consideration of the tax rates of the new fiscal regime for Pemex-Exploration and Production already legislated for 20122013 to the future pre-tax net cash flows related to Mexico’s proved oil and gas reserves.

The estimated future payment of taxes was calculated based on the new fiscal regime made applicable by decree to Pemex-Exploration and Production effective January 1, 20112013 and which reformed Chapter XII of the Federal Law of Hydrocarbon Duties. See Note 19.Duties Law.

The standardized measure provided below represents a comparative benchmark value rather than an estimate of expected future cash flows or fair market value of PEMEX’s production rights. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond the control of the producer. Accordingly, reserve estimates may be materially different from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as of December 31

 

  2011 2010 2009   2013 2012 2011 
  (in millions of dollars)   (in millions of U.S. dollars) 

Future cash inflows

  U.S. $1,004,082   U.S. $730,864   U.S. $591,730    U.S. $931,874   U.S. $974,411   U.S. $1,004,082  

Future production costs (excluding taxes)

   (118,123  (102,451  (92,803   (135,211 (124,485 (118,123

Future development costs

   (38,521  (43,452  (49,937

Future development cost

   (46,339 (46,146 (38,521
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Future cash flows before tax

   847,437    584,851    448,991     750,324    803,780    847,438  

Future production and excess gains taxes

   (649,023  (478,914  (390,385   (634,371  (664,343  (649,023
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Future net cash flows

   198,414    105,938    58,606     115,953    139,437    198,415  

Effect of discounting net cash flows by 10%

   (60,518  (47,558  (28,404   (34,996  (41,913  (60,518
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  U.S. $137,896   U.S. $58,380   U.S. $30,202    U.S. $80,957   U.S. $97,524   U.S. $137,897  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Note:Note: Table amounts may not total due to rounding.

PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS, SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

(Figures stated in thousands, except as noted)

To comply with ASC Topic 932, the following table presents the aggregate standardized measure changes for each yearof the last three years and significant sources of variance:

Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

 

  2011 2010 2009   2013 2012 2011 
  (in millions of dollars)   (in millions of U.S. dollars) 

Sales of oil and gas produced, net of production costs

  U.S. $(91,280 U.S. $  (67,632 U.S. $  (52,079  U.S. $(82,802 U.S. $(87,609 U.S. $(91,280

Net changes in prices and production costs

   269,575    87,085    95,338     (61,268 (58,215 269,575  

Extensions and discoveries

   7,935    6,814    8,886     4,280   6,315   7,935  

Development cost incurred during the year

   10,554    11,906    11,209     14,224   11,431   10,554  

Changes in estimated development costs

   (11,722  (5,549  (12,012   (12,625 (17,466 (11,722

Reserves revisions and timing changes

   57,968    28,293    21,711     49,091   58,150   57,968  

Accretion of discount of pre-tax net cash flows

   29,216    22,453    14,492     54,280   56,921   29,216  

Net changes in production and excess gains taxes

   (192,730  (55,192  (69,432   18,253   (9,899 (192,730
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Aggregate change in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  U.S. $79,516   U.S. $28,178   U.S. $18,113    U.S. $(16,567 U.S. $(40,372 U.S. $79,516  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Standardized measure

        

As of January 1

   58,380    30,202    12,089     97,524    137,896    58,380  

As of December 31

   137,896    58,380    30,202     80,957    97,524    137,896  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Change

  U.S. $79,516   U.S. $28,178   U.S. $18,113    U.S. $(16,567)  U.S. $(40,372 U.S.$79,516  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:Table amounts may not total due to rounding.

Note: Table amounts may not total due to rounding.

In computing the amounts under each factor of change, the effects of variances in prices and costs are computed before the effects of changes in quantities. Consequently, changes in reserves are calculated at December 31 prices and costs. The change in computed taxes includes taxes effectively incurred during the year and the change in future tax expense.

 

F-127F-111