As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2013.16, 2014.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122013

Commission file number 333-08752001-35934

Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Mexican Economic Development, Inc.

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

United Mexican States

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

General Anaya No. 601 Pte.

Colonia Bella Vista

Monterrey, NL 64410 Mexico

(Address of principal executive offices)

Juan F. Fonseca

General Anaya No. 601 Pte.

Colonia Bella Vista

Monterrey, NL 64410 Mexico

(52-818) 328-6167

investor@femsa.com.mx

(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and

address of company contact person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be file by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

-i-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(continued)

-ii-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(continued)

-iii-

INTRODUCTION

This annual report contains information materially consistent with the information presented in the audited financial statements and is free of material misstatements of fact that are not material inconsistencies with the information in the audited financial statements.

References

The terms “FEMSA,” “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our,” are used in this annual report to refer to Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. and, except where the context otherwise requires, its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We refer to our subsidiary Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., as “Coca-Cola FEMSA,” our subsidiary FEMSA Comercio, S.A. de C.V., as “FEMSA Comercio,” and our subsidiary CB Equity LLP, as “CB Equity.”

The term “S.A.B.” stands forsociedad anónima bursátil, which is the term used in the United Mexican States, or Mexico, to denominate a publicly traded company under the Mexican Securities Market Law (Ley del Mercado de Valores), which we refer to as the Mexican Securities Law.

References to “U.S. dollars,” “US$,” “dollars” or “$” are to the lawful currency of the United States of America (which we refer to as the United States). References to “Mexican pesos,” “pesos” or “Ps.” are to the lawful currency of Mexico. References to “euros” or “€” are to the lawful currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union (which we refer to as the Euro Zone).

Currency Translations and Estimates

This annual report contains translations of certain Mexican peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. These translations should not be construed as representations that the Mexican peso amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, such U.S. dollar amounts have been translated from Mexican pesos at an exchange rate of Ps. 12.963513.0980 to US$ 1.00, the noon buying rate for Mexican pesos on December 31, 2012,2013, as published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board in its H.10 Weekly Release of Foreign Exchange Rates. On March 31, 2013,April 4, 2014, this exchange rate was Ps. 12.315513.0265 to US$ 1.00.See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rate Information”for information regarding exchange rates since 2008.2009.

To the extent estimates are contained in this annual report, we believe that such estimates, which are based on internal data, are reliable. Amounts in this annual report are rounded, and the totals may therefore not precisely equal the sum of the numbers presented.

Per capita growth rates and population data have been computed based upon statistics prepared by theInstituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informáticaof Mexico (National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Information, which we refer to as INEGI), the U.S. Federal Reserve Board andBanco de México (Bank of Mexico), local entities in each country and upon our estimates.

Forward-Looking Information

This annual report contains words, such as “believe,” “expect” and “anticipate” and similar expressions that identify forward-looking statements. Use of these words reflects our views about future events and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors that may be beyond our control, including but not limited to effects on our company from changes in our relationship with or among our affiliated companies, movements in the prices of raw materials, competition, significant developments in Mexico orand the other countries in which we operate, our ability to successfully integrate mergers and acquisitions we have completed in recent years, international economic or political conditions or changes in our regulatory environment. Accordingly, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In any event, these statements speak only as of their respective dates, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEMS 1-2. NOT APPLICABLE

ITEM 3.       KEY INFORMATION

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

We preparedThis annual report includes (under Item 18) our audited consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual reportare prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Our date of transition to IFRS was January 1, 2011. These consolidated annual financial statements are our first financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. IFRS 1— “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” has been applied in preparing these financial statements. Note 27 to our audited consolidated financial statements contains an explanation of our adoption of IFRS and reconciliation between Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (Normas de Información Financiera Mexicanas, or “Mexican FRS”) and IFRS as of January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2011.

This annual report includes (under Item 18) our audited consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and January 1, 2011, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 were prepared in accordance with IFRS. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 were prepared in accordance with IFRS, but they differ from the information previously published for 2011 because they were originally presented in accordance with Mexican FRS.

Pursuant to IFRS, the information presented in this annual report presents financial information for 2013, 2012 and 2011 in nominal terms in Mexican pesos, taking into account local inflation of any hyperinflationary economic environment and converting from local currency to Mexican pesos using the official exchange rate at the end of the period published by the local central bank of each country categorized as a hyperinflationary economic environment (for this annual report, only Venezuela). See Note 3.4 to our audited consolidated financial statements. For each non-hyperinflationary economic environment, local currency is converted to Mexican pesos using the year-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities, the historical exchange rate for equity and the average exchange rate for the income statement.

Our non-Mexican subsidiaries maintain their accounting records in the currency and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the country where they are located. For presentation in our consolidated financial statements, we adjust these accounting records into IFRS and reported in Mexican pesos under these standards.

Except when specifically indicated, information in this annual report on Form 20-F is presented as of December 31, 2013 and does not give effect to any transaction, financial or otherwise, subsequent to that date.

The following table presents selected financial information of our company. This information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto. The selected financial information contained herein is presented on a consolidated basis, and is not necessarily indicative of our financial position or results at or for any future date or period; see Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements for our significant accounting policies.

		Year Ended December 31,
		2012(1)(2)				2012(2)				2011(3)
		(in millions of Mexican pesos or millions of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
Income Statement Data:
IFRS
Total revenues		US$	18,383				Ps.238,309				Ps.201,540
Gross Profit			7,814				101,300				84,296
Income before Income Taxes and Share of the Profit of Associates and Joint Ventures Accounted for Using the Equity Method			2,124				27,530				23,552
Income taxes			613				7,949				7,618
Consolidated net income			2,164				28,051				20,901
Controlling interest net income			1,597				20,707				15,332
Non-controlling interest net income			567				7,344				5,569
Basic controlling interest net income:
Per Series B Share			0.08				1.03				0.77
Per Series D Share			0.10				1.30				0.96
Diluted controlling interest net income:
Per Series B Share			0.08				1.03				0.76
Per Series D Share			0.10				1.29				0.96
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (in millions):
Series B Shares			9,246.4				9,246.4				9,246.4
Series D Shares			8,644.7				8,644.7				8,644.7
Allocation of earnings:
Series B Shares			46.11	%			46.11	%			46.11	%
Series D Shares			53.89	%			53.89	%			53.89	%
Financial Position Data:
IFRS
Total assets		US$	22,829				Ps.295,942				Ps.263,362
Current liabilities			3,743				48,516				39,325
Long-term debt(4)			2,209				28,640				23,819
Other long-term liabilities			665				8,625				8,047
Capital stock			258				3,346				3,345
Total equity			16,212				210,161				192,171
Controlling interest			11,977				155,259				144,222
Non-controlling interest			4,235				54,902				47,949
Other Information
IFRS
Depreciation		US$	553				Ps. 7,175				Ps. 5,694
Capital expenditures(5)			1,200				15,560				12,666
Gross margin(6)			43	%			43	%			42	%

(1)	Translation to U.S. dollar amounts at an exchange rate of Ps. 12.963513.0980 to US$ 1.00 solely for the convenience of the reader.

Dividends

We have historically paid dividends per BD Unit (including in the form of American Depositary Shares, or ADSs) approximately equal to or greater than 1% of the market price on the date of declaration, subject to changes in our results and financial position, including due to extraordinary economic events and to the factors described in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors” that affect our financial condition and liquidity. These factors may affect whether or not dividends are declared and the amount of such dividends. We do not expect to be subject to any contractual restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, although our subsidiaries may be subject to such restrictions. Because we are a holding company with no significant operations of our own, we will have distributable profits and cash to pay dividends only to the extent that we receive dividends from our subsidiaries. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will pay dividends or as to the amount of any dividends.

The following table sets forth for each year the nominal amount of dividends per share that we declared in Mexican peso and U.S. dollar amounts and their respective payment dates for the 20082009 to 20122013 fiscal years:

At the annual ordinary general shareholders meeting, or AGM, the board of directors submits the financial statements of our company for the previous fiscal year, together with a report thereon by the board of directors. Once the holders of Series B Shares have approved the financial statements, they determine the allocation of our net profits for the preceding year. Mexican law requires the allocation of at least 5% of net profits to a legal reserve, which is not subsequently available for distribution, until the amount of the legal reserve equals 20% of our paid in capital stock. As of the date of this report, the legal reserve of our company is fully constituted. Thereafter, the holders of Series B Shares may determine and allocate a certain percentage of net profits to any general or special reserve, including a reserve for open-market purchases of our shares. The remainder of net profits is available for distribution in the form of dividends to our shareholders. Dividends may only be paid if net profits are sufficient to offset losses from prior fiscal years.

Our bylaws provide that dividends will be allocated among the outstanding and fully paid shares at the time a dividend is declared in such manner that each Series D-B Share and Series D-L Share receives 125% of the dividend distributed in respect of each Series B Share. Holders of Series D-B Shares and Series D-L Shares are entitled to this dividend premium in connection with all dividends paid by us other than payments in connection with the liquidation of our company.

Subject to certain exceptions contained in the deposit agreement dated May 11, 2007, among FEMSA, The Bank of New York, as ADS depositary, and holders and beneficial owners from time to time of our ADSs, evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, or ADRs, any dividends distributed to holders of our ADSs will be paid to the ADS depositary in Mexican pesos and will be converted by the ADS depositary into U.S. dollars. As a result, restrictions on conversion of Mexican pesos into foreign currencies and exchange rate fluctuations may affect the ability of holders of our ADSs to receive U.S. dollars and the U.S. dollar amount actually received by holders of our ADSs.

Exchange Rate Information

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and year-end noon exchange rate, expressed in Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar, as published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board in its H.10 Weekly Release of Foreign Exchange Rates. The rates have not been restated in constant currency units and therefore represent nominal historical figures.

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Company

Coca-Cola FEMSA

Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business depends on its relationship with The Coca-Cola Company, and changes in this relationship may adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits results and financial condition.

Substantially all of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s sales are derived from sales ofCoca-Cola trademark beverages. Coca-Cola FEMSA produces, markets, sells and distributesCoca-Cola trademark beverages through standard bottler agreements in certain territories in Mexico and Latin America,the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA refers to as “Coca-Cola FEMSA’s territories.”it operates.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Coca-Cola FEMSA—Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Territories.”Through its rights under Coca-Cola FEMSA’s bottler agreements and as a large shareholder, The Coca-Cola Company has the right to participate in the process for making importantcertain decisions related to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business.

The Coca-Cola Company may unilaterally set the price for its concentrate. In addition, under Coca-Cola FEMSA’s bottler agreements, Coca-Cola FEMSAit is prohibited from bottling or distributing any other beverages without The Coca-Cola Company’s authorization or consent, and Coca-Cola FEMSA may not transfer control of the bottler rights of any of its territories without prior consent from The Coca-Cola Company.

The Coca-Cola Company also makes significant contributions to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s marketing expenses, although it is not required to contribute a particular amount. Accordingly, The Coca-Cola Company may discontinue or reduce such contributions at any time.

Coca-Cola FEMSA depends on The Coca-Cola Company to renew Coca-Cola FEMSA’scontinue with its bottler agreements. As of December 31, 2012,2013, Coca-Cola FEMSA had eightnine bottler agreements in Mexico: (i) the agreements for Mexico’s Valley territory, which expire in June 2013 and April 2016 and June 2023, (ii) the agreements for the Central territory, which expire in August 2013,2014 (two agreements) May 2015 and July 2016, (iii) the agreement for the Northeast territory, which expires in September 2014, (iv) the agreement for the Bajio territory, which expires in May 2015, and (v) the agreement for the Southeast territory, which expires in June 2013.2023. As of December 31, 2013, we had four bottler agreements in Brazil, two expiring in October 2017 and the other two expiring in April 2024. Coca-Cola FEMSA’s bottler agreements with The Coca-Cola Company will expire for Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits territories in other countries as follows: Argentina in September 2014; Brazil in April 2014; Colombia in June 2014; Venezuela in August 2016; Guatemala in March 2015; Costa Rica in September 2017; Nicaragua in May 2016 and Panama in November 2014. All of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s bottler agreements are automatically renewable for ten-year terms, subject to the right of either party to give prior notice that it does not wish to renew the applicable agreement. In addition, these agreements generally may be terminated in the case of material breach.See “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts—Material Contracts Relating to Coca-Cola FEMSA.FEMSA—Bottler Agreements.”Termination would prevent Coca-Cola FEMSA from sellingCoca-Cola trademark beverages in the affected territory and would have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits business, financial condition, results and prospects.

The Coca-Cola Company has substantial influence on the conduct of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business, which may result in Coca-Cola FEMSA taking actions contrary to the interests of its remaining shareholders.

The Coca-Cola Company has substantial influence on the conduct of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business. As of March 31, 2013,April 4, 2014, The Coca-Cola Company indirectly owned 28.7%28.1% of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s outstanding capital stock, representing 37.0% of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s shares with full voting rights. The Coca-Cola Company is entitled to appoint five of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s maximum of 21 directors and the vote of at least two of them is required to approve certain actions by Coca-Cola FEMSA’s board of directors. As of March 31, 2013,April 4, 2014, we indirectly owned 48.9%47.9% of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s outstanding capital stock, representing 63.0% of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s shares with full voting rights. We are entitled to appoint 13 of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s maximum of 21 directors and all of its executive officers. We and The Coca-Cola Company together, or only we in certain circumstances, have the power to determine the outcome of all actions requiring the approval of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s board of directors, and we and The Coca-Cola Company together, or only we in certain circumstances, have the power to determine the outcome of all actions requiring the approval of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s shareholders.See “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts—Material Contracts Relating to Coca-Cola FEMSA.FEMSA—Shareholders Agreement.”The interests of The Coca-Cola Company may be different from the interests of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s remaining shareholders, which may result in Coca-Cola FEMSA taking actions contrary to the interests of Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits remaining shareholders.

Changes in consumer preference and public concern about health related issues could reduce demand for some of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products.

The non-alcoholic beverage industry is evolving as a result of, among other things, changes in consumer preferences and regulatory actions. There have been different plans and actions adopted in recent years by governmental authorities in some of the countries where Coca-Cola FEMSA operates that have resulted in increased taxes or the imposition of new taxes on the sale of beverages containing certain sweeteners, and other regulatory measures, such as restrictions on advertising for some of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products. Moreover, researchers, health advocates and dietary guidelines are encouraging consumers to reduce their consumption of certain types of beverages sweetened with sugar and High Fructose Corn Syrup, or HFCS. In addition, concerns over the environmental impact of plastic may reduce the consumption of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products sold in plastic bottles or result in additional taxes that would adversely affect consumer demand. Increasing public concern about these issues, possible new or increased taxes, regulatory measures and governmental regulations could reduce demand for some of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products which would adversely affect its results.

Competition could adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s financial performance.

The beverage industry in the territories in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates is highly competitive. Coca-Cola FEMSA faces competition from other bottlers of sparkling beverages, such asPepsi products, and from producers of low cost beverages or “B brands.” Coca-Cola FEMSA also competes in beverage categories other than sparkling beverages, such as water, juice-based beverages, teas, sport drinks and value-added dairy products. Although competitive conditions are different in each of Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits territories, Coca-Cola FEMSA competes principally in terms of price, packaging, consumer sales promotions, customer service and product innovation.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Coca-Cola FEMSA—Competition.”There can be no assurances that Coca-Cola FEMSA will be able to avoid lower pricing as a result of competitive pressure. Lower pricing, changes made in response to competition and changes in consumer preferences may have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s financial performance.

Changes in consumer preference could reduce demand for some of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products.

The non-alcoholic beverage industry is rapidly evolving as a result of, among other things, changes in consumer preferences. Specifically, consumers are becoming increasingly more aware of and concerned about environmental and health issues. Concerns over the environmental impact of plastic may reduce the consumption of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products sold in plastic bottles or result in additional taxes that would adversely affect consumer demand. In addition, researchers, health advocates and dietary guidelines are encouraging consumers to reduce their consumption of certain types of beverages sweetened with sugar and High Fructose Corn Syrup (“HFCS”), which could reduce demand for certain of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products. A reduction in consumer demand would adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s results.

Water shortages or any failure to maintain existing concessions could adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business.

Water is an essential component of all of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products. Coca-Cola FEMSA obtains water from various sources in its territories, including springs, wells, rivers and municipal and state water companies pursuant to either concessions granted by governments in its various territories or pursuant to contracts.

Coca-Cola FEMSA obtains the vast majority of the water used in its production from municipal utility companies and pursuant to concessions to use wells, which are generally granted based on studies of the existing and projected groundwater supply. Coca-Cola FEMSA’s existing water concessions or contracts to obtain water may be terminated by governmental authorities under certain circumstances and their renewal depends on receiving necessary authorizations from local and/or federal water authorities.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulatory Matters—Water Supply.”In some of Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits other territories, Coca-Cola FEMSA’s existing water supply may not be sufficient to meet Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits future production needs, and the available water supply may be adversely affected by shortages or changes in governmental regulations and environmental changes.

We cannot assure you that water will be available in sufficient quantities to meet Coca-Cola FEMSA’s future production needs or will prove sufficient to meet Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits water supply needs.

Increases in the prices of raw materials would increase Coca-Cola FEMSA’s cost of goods sold and may adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits results.

In addition to water, Coca-Cola FEMSA’s most significant raw materials are (1) concentrate, which Coca-Cola FEMSAit acquires from affiliates of The Coca-Cola Company, (2) sweeteners and (3) packaging materials. Prices for sparkling beverages’beverages concentrate are determined by The Coca-Cola Company as a percentage of the weighted average retail price in local currency, net of applicable taxes. The Coca-Cola Company has unilaterally increased concentrate prices in the past and may do so again in the future. We cannot assure you that The Coca-Cola Company will not

increase the price of the concentrate for sparkling beverages or change the manner in which such price will be calculated in the future. Coca-Cola FEMSA may not be successful in negotiating or implementing measures to mitigate the negative effect this may have in the pricing of its products or its results. The prices for Coca-Cola FEMSA’s remaining raw materials are driven by market prices and local availability, the imposition of import duties and restrictions and fluctuations in exchange rates. Coca-Cola FEMSA is also required to meet all of its supply needs from suppliers approved by The Coca-Cola Company, which may limit the number of suppliers available to it. Coca-Cola FEMSA’s sales prices are denominated in the local currency in each country in which it operates, while the prices of certain materials, including those used in the bottling of Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits products, mainly resin, preforms to make plastic bottles, finished plastic bottles, aluminum cans and HFCS, are paid in or determined with reference to the U.S. dollar, and therefore may increase if the U.S. dollar appreciates against the currency of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates, as was the case in 2008 and 2009. In 2011, the U.S. dollar did not appreciate against the currencies of most of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operated; however, in 2012, the U.S. dollar did appreciate against some of those currencies.operates. We cannot anticipate whether the U.S. dollar will appreciate or depreciate with respect to such currencies in the future.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Coca-Cola FEMSA—Raw Materials.”

Coca-Cola FEMSA’s most significant packaging raw material costs arise from the purchase of resin and plastic preforms to make plastic bottles and from the purchase of finished plastic bottles, the prices of which are tiedrelated to crude oil prices and global resin supply. The average prices that Coca-Cola FEMSA paid for resin and plastic preforms in U.S. dollars in 2013, as compared to 2012 were lower in 2012, as compared to 2011.Central America, Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina, remained flat in Mexico and were higher in Colombia. We cannot provide any assurance that prices will not increase in future periods. During 2012,2013, average sweetener prices, as a whole,in almost all of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s territories except Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Panama, were lower as compared to 20112012 in all of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates. From 20092010 through 2012,2013, international sugar prices were volatile due to various factors, including shifting demands, availability and climate issues affecting production and distribution. In all of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates, other than Brazil, sugar prices are subject to local regulations and other barriers to market entry that cause Coca-Cola FEMSA to pay in excess of international market prices.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Coca-Cola FEMSA—Raw Materials.”We cannot assure you that Coca-Cola FEMSA’s raw material prices will not further increase in the future. Increases in the prices of raw materials would increase Coca-Cola FEMSA’s cost of goods sold and adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s financial performance.

Taxes could adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business.

The countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates may adopt new tax laws or modify existing laws to increase taxes applicable to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business. For example, in Mexico,

On January 1, 2014, a general tax reform became effective in Mexico. This reform included the imposition of a new special tax on January 1, 2010, pursuantthe production, sale and importation of beverages with added sugar, at the rate of Ps.1.00 per liter. This special tax could have a material adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business, financial condition and results; however, Coca-Cola FEMSA is currently working on taking the necessary measures with respect to which,its operating structure and portfolio in order to mitigate this negative effect. Moreover, similar to other affected entities in the industry, Coca-Cola FEMSA has filed constitutional challenges (juicios de amparo) against this special tax. We cannot assure you that these measures will have the desired effect or that Coca-Cola FEMSA will prevail in its constitutional challenge. In addition, the tax reform in Mexico, as applicable to Coca-Cola-FEMSA, there was a temporary increase inCoca-Cola FEMSA, confirmed the income tax rate of 30%, eliminated the corporate flat tax, or IETU, imposed withholding taxes at a rate of 10% on the payment of dividends and capital gains from 28% to 30% from 2010 through 2012. Pursuant to an amendment issued at the endsale of 2012,shares, limited the 30%total amount of income tax rate will continuepaid or retained on dividends paid outside of Mexico and limited the total amount that can be deducted from exempt payments to apply through 2013. In addition,employees.See “Item 4. Information on the value added tax (“VAT”) rate in Mexico increased in 2010 from 15% to 16%.

In Panama, there was an increase in a certain consumer tax, effective as of April 1, 2010, affecting syrups, powders and concentrate. Some of these materials are used for the production of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s sparkling beverages. These taxes increased from 6% to 10%.

In November 2012, the government of the Province of Buenos Aires adopted Law No. 14,394, which increased the tax rate applied to product sales within the Province of Buenos Aires. If the products are manufactured in plants located in the territory of the Province of Buenos Aires, Law No. 14,394 increases the tax rate from 1% to 1.75%; if the products are manufactured in any other Argentine province, the law increases the tax rate from 3% to 4%.Company—Regulatory Matters—Mexican Tax Reform.”

In Brazil, the federal taxes applied on the production and sale of beverages are based on the national average retail price, calculated based on a yearly survey of each Brazilian beverage brand, combined with a fixed tax rate and a multiplier specific for each class ofdifferent presentation (glass, plastic or can). OnCommencing on October 1, 2012, a number of changes to2014 through October 1, 2018, the Brazilian tax rate became effective. These changes include increases in the multipliersmultiplier used to calculate taxes on soft drink taxes whendrinks presented in cans or glasses. Upon effectiveness, the multiplier for cans increased from 30.0% to 31.9%, and beginning in September 2014, the multiplierglasses will gradually increase upper year from 31.9% and 37.2% to 38.1%38.0% and 44.4%, respectively, and the multiplier used to calculate taxes on energy and isotonic drinks presented in October 1, 2018. The multiplier forcans and glasses increased from 35.0% to 37.2%, and beginning in September 2014, the multiplier will gradually increase upper year from 31.9% to 44.4% in October 1, 2018. In addition, the amendment suspended the 50% production tax benefit that had previously applied to juice-added37.5%. The multipliers for other presentations of carbonated soft drinks, energy and raised the rate forisotonic drinks, such beverages to the level currently applied to cola beverages. The amendments that benefited Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Brazilian subsidiary were the reduction of the production tax on concentrate, from 27.0% to 20.0%,as plastic, cups and the elimination of the sale tax on mineral water (sparkling or still).fountain, will not change.

In 2013, the government of Argentina imposed a withholding tax at a rate of 10% on dividends paid by Argentine companies to non-Argentine stakeholders. Similarly, in 2013, the government of Costa Rica repealed a tax exemption on dividends paid to Mexican residents. Future dividends paid to Mexican residents will be subject to withholding tax at a rate of 15% in Costa Rica.

Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products are also subject to certainother taxes in many of the countries in which it operates. Certain countries in Central America, Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina, also impose taxes on sparkling beverages.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulatory Matters—Taxation of Sparkling Beverages.”We cannot assure you that any governmental authority in any country where Coca-Cola FEMSA operates will not impose new taxes or increase taxes on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products in the future. The imposition of new taxes or increases in taxes on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products may have a material adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits business, financial condition, prospects and results.

Regulatory developments may adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business.

Coca-Cola FEMSA is subject to regulation in each of the territories in which it operates. The principal areas in which Coca-Cola FEMSA is subject to regulation are water, environment, labor, taxation, health and antitrust. Regulation can also affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s ability to set prices for its products.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulatory Matters.”The adoption of new laws or regulations or a stricter interpretation or enforcement thereof in the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates may increase Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits operating costs or impose restrictions on Coca-Cola FEMSA’sits operations which, in turn, may adversely affect itsCoca-Cola FEMSA’s financial condition, business and results. In particular, environmental standards are becoming more stringent in several of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates, and Coca-Cola FEMSA is in the process of complying with these standards, although we cannot assure you that in any event Coca-Cola FEMSA will be able to meet any timelines for compliance established by the relevant regulatory authorities.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulatory Matters—Environmental Matters.”Further changes in current regulations may result in an increase in compliance costs, which may have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s future results or financial condition.

Voluntary price restraints or statutory price controls have been imposed historically in several of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates. Currently, there are no price controls on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products in any of the territories in which it has operations, except for those in (i) Argentina, where authorities directly supervise certaintwo of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products sold through supermarkets as a measure to control inflation;inflation, and (ii) Venezuela, where the government has recently imposed price controls on certain of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products, including bottled water.water, and has recently imposed a limit on profits earned on the sale of goods, including Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products, seeking to maintain price stability of, and equal access to, goods and services. If Coca-Cola FEMSA exceeds such limit on profits, it may be forced to reduce the prices of its products in Venezuela, which would in turn adversely affect its business and results of operations. In addition, consumer protection laws in Venezuela are subject to continuing review and changes, and any such changes may have an adverse impact on Coca-Cola FEMSA. We cannot assure you that existing or future regulations in Venezuela relating to goods and services will not result in increased limits on profits or a forced reduction of prices affecting Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products, which could have a negative effect on its results of operations. The imposition of these restrictions or voluntary price restraints in other territories may have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s results and financial position.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulatory Matters—Price Controls.”We cannot assure you that governmental authorities in any country where Coca-Cola FEMSA operates will not impose statutory price controls or that itCoca-Cola FEMSA will not need to implement voluntary price restraints in the future.

In January 2010, the Venezuelan government amended theLey para la Defensa y Acceso a las Personas a los Bienes y Servicios (Access to Goods and Services Defense Law). Any violation by a company that produces, distributes and sells goods and services could lead to fines, penalties or the confiscation of the assets used to produce, distribute and sell these goods without compensation. Although Coca-Cola FEMSA believes it is in compliance with this law, consumer protection laws in Venezuela are subject to continuing review and changes, and any such changes may have an adverse impact on Coca-Cola FEMSA.

In July 2011, the Venezuelan government passed theLey de Costos y Precios Justos (Fair Costs and Prices Law). The purpose of this law is to establish the regulations and administrative processes necessary to maintain the price stability of, and equal access to, goods and services. The law also creates the National Ministry of Costs and Prices, the main role of which is to oversee price controls and set maximum retail prices on certain consumer goods and services. Of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products, only certain of its bottled water beverages were affected by these regulations, which mandated lower sale prices as of April 2012. Any failure to comply with this law would result in fines, temporary suspension or the closure of operations. We cannot assure you that the Venezuelan government’s future regulation of goods and services will not result in a forced reduction of prices in other of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products, which could have a negative effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s results.

In May 2012, the Venezuelan government adopted significant changes to labor regulations. This amendment to Venezuela’s labor regulations, could havewhich had a negative impact on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business and operations. The principal changes that impact onimpacted Coca-Cola FEMSA’s operations are: (i) the requirement that employee terminations are now subject to governmental authorization; (ii) retroactive assessments for any modifications to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s severance payment system; (iii) thea reduction ofin the maximum daily and weekly workworking hours (from 44 to 40 weekly); and (iv) thean increase in obligatorymandatory weekly breaks, prohibiting any correspondinga reduction in salaries.salaries as a result of such increase; and (v) the requirement that all third party contractors participating in the manufacturing and sales processes of its products be included in Coca-Cola FEMSA’s payroll by no later than May 2015. Coca-Cola FEMSA is currently in compliance with these labor regulations and expects to include all third party contractors to its payroll by the imposed deadline.

In January 2012, the Costa Rican government approved a decree, which regulates the sale of food and beverages in schools. The decree came into effect in 2012. Enforcement of this law will behas been gradual fromsince it started in 2012 toand until 2014, depending on the specific characteristics of the food and beverage in question. According to the decree, the sale of specific sparkling beverages and still beverages that contain sugar, syrup or HFCS in any type of presentation in schools is prohibited. Coca-Cola FEMSA willis still be allowed to sell water and certain still beverages in schools. We cannot assure you that the Costa Rican government will not further restrict sales of other of itsCoca-Cola FEMSA’s products in schools in the future; any such further restrictions could lead to an adverse impact on its results.Coca-Cola FEMSA’s results of operations.

Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s results or financial condition.

Coca-Cola FEMSA’s operations have from time to time been and may continue to be subject to investigations and proceedings by antitrust authorities, and litigation relating to alleged anticompetitive practices. Coca-Cola FEMSA has also been subject to investigations and proceedings on environmental and labor matters.See “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”We cannot assure you that these investigations and proceedings will not have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s results or financial condition.

Economic and political conditions in the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates other than Mexico may increasingly adversely affect its business.See “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

In addition to Mexico, Coca-Cola FEMSA conducts operations in Brazil, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela and Argentina. Total revenues from Coca-Cola FEMSA’s combined non-Mexican operations decreased as a percentage of its consolidated total revenues from 63.8% in 2011 to 60.8% in 2012; for the same non-Mexican operations, Coca-Cola FEMSA’s gross profit decreased as a percentage of its consolidated gross profit from 62.2% in 2011 to 59.3% in 2012. Given the relevance of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s non-Mexican operations, its results continue to be affected by the economic and political conditions in the countries, other than Mexico, where it conducts operations.

Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business may be affected by the general conditions of the Brazilian economy, the rate of inflation, Brazilian interest rates or exchange rates for Brazilian reais. Decreases in the growth rate of the Brazilian economy, periods of negative growth and/or increases in inflation or interest rates may result in lower demand for Coca-Cola FEMSA’s products, lower real pricing of its products or a shift to lower margin products.

Consumer demand, preferences, real prices and the costs of raw materials are heavily influenced by macroeconomic and political conditions in the other countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates. These conditions vary by country and may not be correlated to conditions in Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Mexican operations. In Venezuela, Coca-Cola FEMSA continues to face exchange rate risk as well as scarcity of and restrictions on importing raw materials. Deterioration in economic and political conditions in any of these countries would have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s financial position and results.

Venezuelan political events may affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s operations. Although Venezuela will hold elections on April 14, 2013, in light of the death of President Hugo Chavez, political uncertainty remains. We cannot provide any assurances that political developments in Venezuela, over which Coca-Cola FEMSA has no control, will not have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business, financial condition or results.

On October 7, 2012, General Otto Peréz Molina, representing thePartido Patriota(Patriot Party), was elected to the presidency in Guatemala. We cannot assure you that the elected president will continue to apply the same policies that have been applied to Coca-Cola FEMSA in the past.

Depreciation of the local currencies of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates against the U.S. dollar may increase Coca-Cola FEMSA’s operating costs. Coca-Cola FEMSA has also operated under exchange controls in Venezuela since 2003, which limit its ability to remit dividends abroad or make payments other than in local currencies and that may increase the real price paid for raw materials and services purchased in local currency. In February 2013, the Venezuelan government announced a devaluation in its official exchange rate, from 4.30 to 6.30 bolivars per US$ 1.00. For further information, please see Note 3.3 and Note 29 to our audited consolidated financial statements. Future changes in the Venezuelan exchange control regime, and future currency devaluations or the imposition of exchange controls in any of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA has operations could have an adverse effect on its financial position and results.

We cannot assure you that political or social developments in any of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA has operations, over which we have no control, will not have a corresponding adverse effect on the global market or on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business, financial condition or results.

Weather conditions may adversely affect Coca-Cola FEMSA’s results.

Lower temperatures and higher rainfall may negatively impact consumer patterns, which may result in lower per capita consumption of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s beverage offerings. Additionally, adverse weather conditions may affect road infrastructure and points of sale in the territories in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates and limit Coca-Cola FEMSA’s ability to sell and distribute its products, thus affecting its results.

Coca-Cola FEMSA now conducts business in countries in which it hashad not previously operated and that present different or greater risks than certain countries in Latin America.

As a result of the acquisition of 51% of the outstanding shares of the Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc. (“CCBPI”), or CCBPI, Coca-Cola FEMSA has expanded its geographic reach from Latin America to include the Philippines. The Philippines presents different risks and different competitive pressures than the risks Coca-Cola FEMSAthose it faces in Latin America. Coca-Cola FEMSA has not previously conducted business in CCPBI’s territories. Coca-Cola FEMSA now faces competitive pressures that are different than those Coca-Cola FEMSA has historically faced. In the Philippines, Coca-Cola FEMSA is the only beverage company competing across categories, and it faces significant competition in each category. In addition, the per capita income of the population in Philippines is lower than the average per capita income in the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA currently operates, and the distribution and marketing practices in the Philippines differ from Coca-Cola FEMSA’s historical practices. Coca-Cola FEMSA may have to adapt its marketing and distribution strategies to compete effectively. Coca-Cola FEMSA’s inability to compete effectively may have an adverse effect on its future results.

See “Item 4. InformationCoca-Cola FEMSA may not be able to successfully integrate its recent acquisitions and achieve the operational efficiencies and/or expected synergies.

Coca-Cola FEMSA has and may continue to acquire bottling operations and other businesses. A key element to achieve the benefits and expected synergies of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s recent and future acquisitions and/or mergers is to integrate the operation of acquired or merged businesses into Coca-Cola FEMSA’s operations in a timely and effective manner. Coca-Cola FEMSA may incur unforeseen liabilities in connection with acquiring, taking control of or managing bottling operations and other businesses and may encounter difficulties and unforeseen or additional costs in restructuring and integrating them into its operating structure. We cannot assure you that these efforts will be successful or completed as expected by Coca-Cola FEMSA, and Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business, results and financial condition could be adversely affected if it is unable to do so.

Political and social events in the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA operates may significantly affect its operations.

In April 2013, the presidential election in Venezuela led to the election of a new president, Nicolás Maduro Moros. In April 2014, the presidential election in Costa Rica led to the election of a new president, Luis Guillermo Solís. Also in 2014, Panama, Colombia and Brazil will hold presidential elections that will lead to the election of new presidents. The new administrations elected or to be elected in the countries in which we operate may implement significant changes in laws, public policy and/or regulations that could affect the political and economic conditions in these countries. Any such changes may have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business, financial condition or results.

We cannot assure you that political or social developments in any of the countries in which Coca-Cola FEMSA has operations, such as the recent civil disturbances in Venezuela, over which we have no control, will not have a corresponding adverse effect on the Company—The Company—Recent Acquisitions.”global market or on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s business, financial condition or results.

FEMSA Comercio

Competition from other retailers in Mexico could adversely affect FEMSA Comercio’s business.

The Mexican retail sector is highly competitive. FEMSA participates in the retail sector primarily through FEMSA Comercio. FEMSA Comercio’s OXXO stores face competition from small-format stores like 7-Eleven, Super Extra, Super City, Círculo K stores and other numerous chains of retailers across Mexico, from other regional small formatsmall-format retailers to small informal neighborhood stores. In particular, small informal neighborhood stores can sometimes avoid regulatory oversight and taxation, enabling them to sell certain products at below market prices. In addition, these small informal neighborhood stores could improve their technological capabilities so as to enable credit card transactions and electronic payment of utility bills, which would diminish FEMSA Comercio’s competitive advantage. FEMSA Comercio may face additional competition from new market entrants. Increased competition may limit the number of new locations available to FEMSA Comercio and require FEMSA Comercio to modify its product offering or pricing. In addition, consumers may prefer alternative products or store formats offered by competitors. As a result, FEMSA Comercio’s results and financial position may be adversely affected by competition in the future.

Sales of OXXO conveniencesmall-format stores may be adversely affected by changes in economic conditions in Mexico.

ConvenienceSmall-format stores often sell certain products at a premium. The conveniencesmall-format store market is thus highly sensitive to economic conditions, since an economic slowdown is often accompanied by a decline in consumer purchasing power, which in turn results in a decline in the overall consumption of FEMSA Comercio’s main product categories. During periods of economic slowdown, OXXO stores may experience a decline in traffic per store and purchases per customer, and this may result in a decline in FEMSA Comercio’s results.

Taxes could adversely affect FEMSA Comercio’s business.

Mexico may adopt new tax laws or modify existing laws to increase taxes applicable to FEMSA Comercio’s business. For example, a generalnew decree amending and supplementing certain tax reformprovisions, which became effective on January 1, 2010, pursuant to which,2014, provided that the income tax rate as applicable to FEMSA Comercio there was a temporary increase inwill remain at 30% for 2014 and subsequent years, instead of decreasing to 29% and 28% for 2014 and 2015 onwards as provided by the income tax rate from 28% to 30% from 2010 through 2012. Pursuant to an amendment issued at the end of 2012, the 30% income tax rate will continue to apply through 2013. In addition,law before this reform. The 2014 amendments also increased the VAT rate applicable in the border regions of Mexico increased in 2010 from 15%11% to 16%. If to match the general VAT rate increases, itapplicable in the rest of Mexico, which could cause lower traffic or ticket figures for FEMSA Comercio. Furthermore, the 2014 amendments introduced two new excise taxes, the first one related to beverages containing sugar and the second one related to certain food products with high caloric content, including some that are sold at FEMSA Comercio stores, which could also cause lower traffic or ticket figures.See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulatory Matters—Mexican Tax Reform.”

FEMSA Comercio may not be able to maintain its historic growth rate.

FEMSA Comercio increased the number of OXXO stores at a compound annual growth rate of 13.6%12.4% from 20082009 to 2012.2013. The growth in the number of OXXO stores has driven growth in total revenue and results at FEMSA Comercio over the same period. As the overall number of stores increases, percentage growth in the number of OXXO stores is likely to decrease. In addition, as conveniencesmall-format store penetration in Mexico grows, the number of viable new store locations may decrease, and new store locations may be less favorable in terms of same store sales, average ticket and store traffic. As a result, FEMSA Comercio’s future results and financial condition may not be consistent with prior periods and may be characterized by lower growth rates in terms of total revenue and results. In Colombia, FEMSA Comercio may not be able to maintain similar historic growth rates to those in Mexico.

FEMSA Comercio’s business may be adversely affected by an increase of insecurity in Mexico.

In recent years, crime rates have remained high, particularly in the north of Mexico, and there has been a particular increase in drug-related crime and other organized crime. Although FEMSA Comercio has stores across the majority of the Mexican territory, the north of Mexico represents an important region in FEMSA Comercio’s operations. An increase in crime rates could negatively affect sales and customer traffic, increase security expenses incurred in each store, result in higher turnover of personnel or damage to the perception of the OXXO brand, each of which could have an adverse effect on FEMSA Comercio’s business.

FEMSA Comercio’s business may be adversely affected by changes in information technology.

FEMSA Comercio invests aggressively in information technology (which we refer to as IT) in order to maximize its value generation potential. Given the rapid speed at which FEMSA Comercio adds new services and products to its commercial offerings, the development of IT systems, hardware and software needs to keep pace with the growth of the business. If these systems became unstable or if planning for future IT investments were inadequate, it could affect FEMSA Comercio’s business by reducing the flexibility of its value proposition to consumers or by increasing its operating complexity, either of which could adversely affect FEMSA Comercio’s revenue-per-store trends.

FEMSA Comercio’s business could be adversely affected by a failure, interruption, or breach of our IT system.

FEMSA Comercio’s business relies heavily on its advanced IT system to effectively manage its data, communications, connectivity, and other business processes. Although we constantly improve our IT system and protect it with advanced security measures, it may still be subject to defects, interruptions, or security breaches such as viruses or data theft. Such a defect, interruption, or breach could adversely affect FEMSA Comercio’s results or financial position.

FEMSA Comercio’s business may be adversely affected by an increase in the price of electricity.

The performance of FEMSA Comercio’s stores would be adversely affected by increases in the price of utilities on which the stores depend, such as electricity. Although the price of electricity in Mexico has remained stable recently, it could potentially increase as a result of inflation, shortages, interruptions in supply, or other reasons, and such an increase could adversely affect our results or financial position.

FEMSA Comercio’s business acquisitions may lead to decreased profit margins.

During 2013, FEMSA Comercio entered into two new markets through the acquisition of two drugstore businesses and one quick service restaurant chain. Each of these businesses is currently less profitable than OXXO, and the acquisitions might therefore marginally dilute FEMSA Comercio’s margins in the short to medium term.

Risks Related to Our Holding of Heineken N.V. and Heineken Holding N.V. Shares

FEMSA does not control Heineken N.V.’s and Heineken Holding N.V.’s decisions.

On April 30, 2010, FEMSA announced the closing of the transaction pursuant to which FEMSA agreed to exchange 100% of its beer operations for a 20% economic interest in Heineken N.V. and Heineken Holding N.V. (which, together with their respective subsidiaries, we refer to as Heineken or the Heineken Group). As a consequence of this transaction, which we refer to as the Heineken transaction, FEMSA now participates in the Heineken Holding N.V. Board of Directors, which we refer to as the Heineken Holding Board, and in the Heineken N.V. Supervisory Board, which we refer to as the Heineken Supervisory Board. However, FEMSA is not a majority or controlling shareholder of Heineken N.V. or Heineken Holding N.V., nor does it control the decisions of the Heineken Holding Board or the Heineken Supervisory Board. Therefore, the decisions made by the majority or controlling shareholders of Heineken N.V. or Heineken Holding N.V. or the Heineken Holding Board or the Heineken Supervisory Board may not be consistent with or may not consider the interests of FEMSA’s shareholders or may be adverse to the interests of FEMSA’s shareholders. Additionally, FEMSA has agreed not to disclose non-public information and decisions taken by Heineken.

Heineken is present in a large number of countries.

Heineken is a global brewer and distributor of beer in a large number of countries. As a consequence of the Heineken transaction, FEMSA shareholders are indirectly exposed to the political, economic and social circumstances affecting the markets in which Heineken is present, which may have an adverse effect on the value of FEMSA’s interest in Heineken, and, consequently, the value of FEMSA shares.

Strengthening of the Mexican peso compared to the Euro.

In the event of a depreciation of the euro against the Mexican peso, the fair value of FEMSA’s investment in Heineken’s shares will be adversely affected.

Furthermore, the cash flow that is expected to be received in the form of dividends from Heineken will be in euros, and therefore, in the event of a depreciation of the euro against the Mexican peso, the amount of expected cash flow will be adversely affected.

Heineken N.V. and Heineken Holding N.V. are publicly listed companies.

Heineken N.V. and Heineken Holding N.V. are listed companies whose stock trades publicly and is subject to market fluctuation. A reduction in the price of Heineken N.V. or Heineken Holding N.V. shares would result in a reduction in the economic value of FEMSA’s participation in Heineken.

Risks Related to Our Principal Shareholders and Capital Structure

A majority of our voting shares are held by a voting trust, which effectively controls the management of our company, and the interests of which may differ from those of other shareholders.

As of March 15, 2013,14, 2014, a voting trust, of which the participants are members of seven families, owned 38.69% of our capital stock and 74.86% of our capital stock with full voting rights, consisting of the Series B Shares. Consequently, the voting trust has the power to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors and to play a significant or controlling role in the outcome of substantially all matters to be decided by our board of directors or our shareholders. The interests of the voting trust may differ from those of our other shareholders.See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Voting Rights and Certain Minority Rights.”

Holders of Series D-B and D-L Shares have limited voting rights.

Holders of Series D-B and D-L Shares have limited voting rights and are only entitled to vote on specific matters, such as certain changes in the form of our corporate organization, dissolution, or liquidation, a merger with a company with a distinct corporate purpose, a merger in which we are not the surviving entity, a change of our jurisdiction of incorporation, the cancellation of the registration of the Series D-B and D-L Shares and any other matters that expressly require approval from such holders under the Mexican Securities Law. As a result of these limited voting rights, Series D-B and D-L holders will not be able to influence our business or operations.See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Voting Rights and Certain Minority Rights.”

Holders of ADSs may not be able to vote at our shareholder meetings.

Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, in the form of ADSs. We cannot assure you that holders of our shares in the form of ADSs will receive notice of shareholders’ meetings from our ADS depositary in sufficient time to enable such holders to return voting instructions to the ADS depositary in a timely manner. In the event that instructions are not received with respect to any shares underlying ADSs, the ADS depositary will, subject to certain limitations, grant a proxy to a person designated by us in respect of these shares. In the event that this proxy is not granted, the ADS depositary will vote these shares in the same manner as the majority of the shares of each class for which voting instructions are received.

Holders of BD Units in the United States and holders of ADSs may not be able to participate in any future preemptive rights offering and as a result may be subject to dilution of their equity interests.

Under applicable Mexican law, if we issue new shares for cash as a part of a capital increase, other than in connection with a public offering of newly issued shares or treasury stock, we are generally required to grant our shareholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage. Rights to purchase shares in these circumstances are known as preemptive rights. By law, we may not allow holders of our shares or ADSs who are located in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increases unless (1) we file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the SEC, with respect to that future issuance of shares or (2) the offering qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. At the time of any future capital increase, we will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement with the SEC, as well as the benefits of preemptive rights to holders of our shares in the form of ADSs in the United States and any other factors that we consider important in determining whether to file a registration statement.

We may decide not to file a registration statement with the SEC to allow holders of our shares or ADSs who are located in the United States to participate in a preemptive rights offering. In addition, under current Mexican law, the sale by the ADS depositary of preemptive rights and the distribution of the proceeds from such sales to the holders of our shares in the form of ADSs is not possible. As a result, the equity interest of holders of our shares in the form of ADSs would be diluted proportionately.See “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Preemptive Rights.”

The protections afforded to minority shareholders in Mexico are different from those afforded to minority shareholders in the United States.

Under Mexican law, the protections afforded to minority shareholders are different from, and may be less than, those afforded to minority shareholders in the United States. Mexican laws do not provide a remedy to shareholders relating to violations of fiduciary duties. There is no procedure for class actions as such actions are conducted in the United States and there are different procedural requirements for bringing shareholder lawsuits against directors for the benefit of companies. Therefore, it may be more difficult for minority shareholders to enforce their rights against us, our directors or our controlling shareholders than it would be for minority shareholders of a United States company.

Investors may experience difficulties in enforcing civil liabilities against us or our directors, officers and controlling persons.

FEMSA is organized under the laws of Mexico, and most of our directors, officers and controlling persons reside outside the United States. In addition, nearly all or a substantial portion of our assets and their respectivethe assets of our subsidiaries are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States on such persons or to enforce judgments against them, including any action based on civil liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws. There is doubt as to the enforceability against such persons in Mexico, whether in original actions or in actions to enforce judgments of U.S. courts, of liabilities based solely on the U.S. federal securities laws.

Developments in other countries may adversely affect the market for our securities.

The market value of securities of Mexican companies is, to varying degrees, influenced by economic and securities market conditions in other emerging market countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, investors’ reaction to developments in one country can have effects on the securities of issuers in other countries, including Mexico. We cannot assure you that events elsewhere, especially in emerging markets, will not adversely affect the market value of our securities.

The failure or inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or other distributions to us may adversely affect us and our ability to pay dividends to holders of ADSs.

We are a holding company. Accordingly, our cash flows are principally derived from dividends, interest and other distributions made to us by our subsidiaries. Currently, our subsidiaries do not have contractual obligations that require them to pay dividends to us. In addition, debt and other contractual obligations of our subsidiaries may in the future impose restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to make dividend or other payments to us, which in turn may adversely affect our ability to pay dividends to shareholders and meet its debt and other obligations. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2012,2014, we had no restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. Given the 2010 exchange of 100% of our ownership of the business of Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma Holding, S.A. de C.V. (formerly FEMSA Cerveza, S.A. de C.V.) (which we refer to as Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma or FEMSA Cerveza) for a 20% economic interest in Heineken, our non-controlling shareholder position in Heineken means that we will be unable to require payment of dividends with respect to the Heineken shares.

Risks Related to Mexico and the Other Countries in Which We Operate

Adverse economic conditions in Mexico may adversely affect our financial position and results.

We are a Mexican corporation, and our Mexican operations are our single most important geographic territory. Given the 2010 exchange of 100% of our FEMSA Cerveza business for a 20% economic interest in the Heineken Group, FEMSA shareholders may face a lesser degree of exposure with respect to economic conditions in Mexico and a greater degree of indirect exposure to the political, economic and social circumstances affecting the markets in which Heineken is present. For the year ended December 31, 2012, 62%2013, 63% of our consolidated total revenues were attributable to Mexico and at the net income level the percentage attributable to our Mexican operations is further reduced. The Mexican economy experienced a downturn as a result ofDuring 2010, 2011 and 2012 the impact of the global financial crisis on many emerging economies that began in the second half of 2008 and continued through 2010.

In 2012, Mexican gross domestic product, or GDP, increased by approximately 5.1%, 4.0% and 3.9%, respectively, and in 2013 it only increased by approximately 1.1% on an annualized basis compared to 2011,2012, due to an improvement in most sectors of the economy, driven by agriculture.lower government spending, lower remittances and a tough consumer environment. We cannot assure you that such conditions will not have a material adverse effect on our results and financial position going forward. The Mexican economy continues to be heavily influenced by the U.S. economy, and therefore, further deterioration in economic conditions in, or delays in recovery of, the U.S. economy may hinder any recovery in Mexico. In the past, Mexico has experienced both prolonged periods of weak economic conditions and deteriorations in economic conditions that have had a negative impact on our results. Given the global macroeconomic downturn in 2009 and 2010, and the slow and incipient recovery in 2011 and 2012, which also affected the Mexican economy, we cannot assure you that such conditions will not have a material adverse effect on our results and financial position going forward.

Our business may be significantly affected by the general condition of the Mexican economy, or by the rate of inflation in Mexico, interest rates in Mexico and exchange rates for, or exchange controls affecting, the Mexican peso. Decreases in the growth rate of the Mexican economy, periods of negative growth and/or increases in inflation or interest rates may result in lower demand for our products, lower real pricing of our products or a shift to lower margin products. Because a large percentage of our costs and expenses are fixed, we may not be able to reduce costs and expenses upon the occurrence of any of these events, and our profit margins may suffer as a result.

In addition, an increase in interest rates in Mexico would increase the cost to us of variable rate debt, Mexican peso-denominated funding, which constituted 18.3%23% of our total debt as of December 31, 20122013 (the total amount of the debt and the variable rate debt used in the calculation of this percentage considers converting only the units of investments debt for the related cross currency swap, and it also includes the effect of related interest rate swaps), and have an adverse effect on our financial position and results.

Depreciation of the Mexican peso relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our financial position and results.

Depreciation of the Mexican peso relative to the U.S. dollar increases the cost to us of a portion of the raw materials we acquire, the price of which is paid in or determined with reference to U.S. dollars, and of our debt obligations denominated in U.S. dollars, and thereby negatively affects our financial position and results. A severe devaluation or depreciation of the Mexican peso may result in disruption of the international foreign exchange markets and may limit our ability to transfer or to convert Mexican pesos into U.S. dollars and other currencies for the purpose of making timely payments of interest and principal on our U.S. dollar-denominated debt or obligations in other currencies. Although the value of theThe Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar had been fairly stable until mid-2008, in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Mexican peso depreciated approximately 27% compared to the fourth quarter of 2007. Since 2008, the Mexican peso has continued to experienceis a free-floating currency and as such, it experiences exchange rate

fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar as follows.over time. During 2010 and 2011, the Mexican peso experienced different fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar of approximately 5.6% of recovery and 12.7% of depreciation compared to the years of 2009 and 2010 respectively. During 2012, the Mexican peso experienced an appreciation relative to the U.S. dollar of approximately 7.1% compared to 2011. During 2013, the Mexican peso experienced a depreciation relative to the U.S. dollar of approximately 1.0% compared to 2012. In the first quarter of 2013,2014, the Mexican peso appreciated approximately 5.0%0.32% relative to the U.S. dollar compared to the fourth quarter of 2012.2013.

While the Mexican government does not currently restrict, and since 1982 has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert Mexican pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer other currencies out of Mexico, the Mexican government could institute restrictive exchange rate policies in the future, as it has done in the past. Currency fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our financial position, results and cash flows in future periods.

When the financial markets are volatile, as they have been in recent periods, our results may be substantially affected by variations in exchange rates and commodity prices, and to a lesser degree, interest rates. These effects include foreign exchange gain and loss on assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars, fair value gain and loss on derivative financial instruments, commodities prices and changes in interest income and interest expense. These effects can be much more volatile than our operating performance and our operating cash flows.

Political events in Mexico could adversely affect our operations.

Mexican political events may significantly affect our operations. Presidential elections in Mexico occur every six years, with the most recent one occurring in July 2012. Enrique Peña Nieto, a member of thePartido Revolucionario Institucional, was elected as the new president of Mexico and took office on December 1, 2012. As with any governmental change, the new government may lead to significant changes in governmental policies, may contribute to economic uncertainty and to heightened volatility of the Mexican capital markets and securities issued by Mexican companies. Currently, no single party has a majority in the Senate or theCámara de Diputados (House of Representatives), and the absence of a clear majority by a single party could result in government gridlock and political uncertainty due touncertainty. While the Mexican congress’ potential inability to reach consensus on theCongress has recently approved a number of structural reforms requiredintended to modernize certain sectors of and foster growth in the Mexican economy. Weeconomy, we cannot provide any assurances that political developments in Mexico, over which we have no control, will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results and prospects.

InsecuritySecurity risks in Mexico could increase, and this could adversely affect our results.

The presence and increasing levels of violence among drug cartels, and between these and the Mexican law enforcement and armed forces, pose a risk to our business. Organized criminal activity and related violent incidents remained high duringhave decreased relative to 2011 and 2012, and to a lesser extent in the first quarter of 2013 andbut remain prevalent. These incidents are relatively concentrated along the northern Mexican border, as well as in certain other Mexican states such as Sinaloa, Michoacán and Guerrero. The north of Mexico is an important region for our retail operations, and an increase in crime rates could negatively affect our sales and customer traffic, increase our security expenses, and result in higher turnover of personnel or damage to the perception of our brands. The principal driver of organized criminal activity is the drug trade that aims to supply and profit from the uninterrupted demand for drugs and the supply of weapons from the United States. This situation could worsen and adversely impact our business and financial results because consumer habits and patterns adjust to the increased perceived and real insecuritysecurity risks, as people refrain from going out as much and gradually shift some on-premise consumption to off-premise consumption of food and beverages on certain social occasions. Insecurity could increase, and this could therefore adversely affect our operational and financial results.

Depreciation of local currencies in other Latin American countries in which we operate may adversely affect our financial position.

Total revenues increased in certain of our non-Mexican beverage operations at a higher rate relative to their respective Mexican operations in 2012. The recurrence of such a higher rate of total revenue growth could result in a greater contribution to the respective results for these territories, but may also expose us to greater risk in these territories as a result. The devaluation of the local currencies against the U.S. dollar in our non-Mexican territories can increase our operating costs in these countries, and depreciation of the local currencies against the Mexican peso can negatively affect our results for these countries. In recent years, the value of the currency in the countries in which we operate had been relatively stable except in Venezuela. During 2013, in addition to Venezuela, the currencies of Brazil and Argentina also depreciated against the Mexican peso. Future currency devaluation or the imposition of exchange controls in any of these countries, includingor in Mexico, would have an adverse effect on our financial position and results.

At the end of January 2014, the exchange rate of the Argentine peso registered a devaluation of approximately 20% with respect to the U.S. dollar. As a result of this devaluation, the balance sheet of our subsidiary could reflect a reduction in shareholders’ equity during 2014. As of December 31, 2013 our foreign direct investment in Argentina, using the exchange rate of 6.38 Argentine pesos per U.S. dollar, was Ps. 945 million.

Depreciation of other local currencies of the countries in which we operate relative to the U.S. dollar may also potentially increase our operating costs. We have operated under exchange controls in Venezuela since 2003, which limit our ability to remit dividends abroad or make payments other than in local currency and that may increase the real price paid for raw materials and services purchased in local currency. We have historically used the official exchange rate (currently 6.30 bolivars to US$1.00) in our Venezuelan operations; however, in January 2014, the Venezuelan government announced that certain transactions, such as payment of services and payments related to foreign investments in Venezuela, must be settled at an alternative exchange rate determined by the state-run system known as theSistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas, or SICAD. The SICAD determines this alternative exchange rate based on limited periodic sales of U.S. dollars through auctions. The exchange rate based on the most recent SICAD auction, held on April 4, 2014 and in effect as of April 7, 2014, was 10.00 bolivars to U.S.$ 1.00. Imports of our raw materials into Venezuela qualify as transactions that may be settled using the official exchange rate of 6.30 bolivars to U.S.$ 1.00, thus, we will continue to account for these transactions using such official exchange rate. Coca-Cola FEMSA will recognize in the cumulative translation account in its consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2014 a reduction in equity as a result of the valuation of its net investment in Venezuela at the SICAD exchange rate (10.70 bolivars to U.S.$ 1.00 as of March 31, 2014). As of December 31, 2013, Coca-Cola FEMSA’s foreign direct investment in Venezuela was Ps. 13,788 million (at the official exchange rate of 6.30 bolivars per U.S.$ 1.00). In addition, in March 2014, the Venezuelan government enacted a new law that authorizes an additional method (known as SICAD II) of exchanging Venezuelan bolivars to U.S. dollars at rates other than the current official exchange and the existing SICAD rates for any other type of transaction different than those described above. As of April 4, 2014, the SICAD II exchange rate was 49.04 bolivars to U.S.$ 1.00. Future changes in the Venezuelan exchange control regime, and future currency devaluations or the imposition of exchange controls in any of the countries in which we operate could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results.

The Company

Overview

We are a Mexican company headquartered in Monterrey, Mexico, and our origin dates back to 1890. Our company was incorporated on May 30, 1936 and has a duration of 99 years. The duration can be extended indefinitely by resolution of our shareholders. Our legal name is Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V., and in commercial contexts we frequently refer to ourselves as FEMSA. Our principal executive offices are located at General Anaya No. 601 Pte., Colonia Bella Vista, Monterrey, Nuevo León 64410, Mexico. Our telephone number at this location is (52-81) 8328-6000. Our website is www.femsa.com. We are organized as asociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable under the laws of Mexico.

We conduct our operations through the following principal holding companies, each of which we refer to as a principal sub-holding company:

Corporate Background

FEMSA traces its origins to the establishment of Mexico’s first brewery, Cervecería Cuauhtémoc, S.A., which we refer to as Cuauhtémoc, which was founded in 1890 by four Monterrey businessmen: Francisco G. Sada, José A. Muguerza, Isaac Garza and José M. Schneider. Descendants of certain of the founders of Cuauhtémoc are participants of the voting trust that controls the management of our company.

The strategic integration of our company dates back to 1936 when our packaging operations were established to supply crown caps to the brewery. During this period, these operations were part of what was known as the Monterrey Group, which also included interests in banking, steel and other packaging operations.

In 1974, the Monterrey Group was split between two branches of the descendants of the founding families of Cuauhtémoc. The steel and other packaging operations formed the basis for the creation of Corporación Siderúrgica, S.A. (now Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V.), controlled by the Garza Sada family, and the beverage and banking operations were consolidated under the Valores Industriales, S.A. de C.V. (the corporate predecessor of FEMSA) corporate umbrella controlled by the Garza Lagüera family. FEMSA’s shares were first listed on what is now the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. (which we refer to as the Mexican Stock Exchange) on September 19, 1978. Between 1977 and 1981, FEMSA diversified its operations through acquisitions in the soft drinks and mineral water industries, the establishment of the first stores under the trade name OXXO and other investments in the hotel, construction, auto parts, food and fishing industries, which were considered non-core businesses and were subsequently divested.

In the 1990s, we began a series of strategic transactions to strengthen the competitive positions of our operating subsidiaries. These transactions included the sale of a 30% strategic interest in Coca-Cola FEMSA to a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company and a subsequent public offering of Coca-Cola FEMSA shares, both of which occurred in 1993. Coca-Cola FEMSA listed its L shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange, and, in the form of ADS, on the New York Stock Exchange.

In 1998, we completed a reorganization that changed our capital structure by converting our outstanding capital stock at the time of the reorganization into BD Units and B Units, and united the shareholders of FEMSA and the former shareholders of Grupo Industrial Emprex, S.A. de C.V. (which we refer to as Emprex) at the same corporate level through an exchange offer that was consummated on May 11, 1998. As part of the reorganization, FEMSA listed ADSs on the NYSE representing BD Units, and listed the BD Units and its B Units on the Mexican Stock Exchange.

In May 2003, our subsidiary Coca-Cola FEMSA expanded its operations throughout Latin America by acquiring 100% of Panamerican Beverages, Inc., which we refer to as Panamco, then the largest soft drink bottler in Latin America in terms of sales volume in 2002. Through its acquisition of Panamco, Coca-Cola FEMSA began producing and distributingCoca-Cola trademark beverages in additional territories in Mexico, Central America, Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil, along with bottled water, beer and other beverages in some of these territories. The Coca-Cola Company and its subsidiaries received Series D Shares in exchange for their equity interest in Panamco of approximately 25%.

In November 2007, Administración S.A.P.I., a Mexican company owned directly or indirectly by Coca-Cola FEMSA and The Coca-Cola Company, acquired 100% of the shares of capital stock of Jugos del Valle, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (which we refer to as Jugos del Valle). The business of Jugos del Valle in the United States was acquired and sold by The Coca-Cola Company. In 2008, Coca-Cola FEMSA, The Coca-Cola Company and all Mexican and BrazilianCoca-Colabottlers entered into a joint business for the Mexican and the Brazilian operations, respectively, of Jugos del Valle. Taking into account the participation held by Grupo Fomento Queretano, Coca-Cola FEMSA currently holds an interest of 25.1% in the Mexican joint business and approximately 19.7% in the Brazilian joint businesses. Jugos del Valle sells fruit juice-based beverages and fruit derivatives.

In April 2008, FEMSA shareholders approved a proposal to amend our bylaws in order to preserve the unit structure for our shares that has been in place since May 1998, and to maintain our existing share structure beyond May 11, 2008. Our bylaws previously provided that on May 11, 2008 our Series D-B Shares would convert into Series B Shares and our Series D-L Shares would convert into Series L Shares with limited voting rights. In addition, our bylaws provided that, on May 11, 2008, our current unit structure would cease to exist and each of our B Units would be unbundled into five Series B Shares, while each BD Unit would unbundle into three Series B Shares and two newly issued Series L Shares. Following the April 22, 2008 shareholder approvals, the automatic conversion of our share and unit structures no longer exist, and, absent shareholder action, our share structure will continue to be comprised of Series B Shares, which must represent not less than 51% of our outstanding capital stock, and Series D-B and Series D-L Shares, which together may represent up to 49% of our outstanding capital stock. Our Unit structure, absent shareholder action, will continue to consist of B Units, which bundle five Series B Shares, and BD Units, which bundle one Series B Share, two Series D-B Shares and two Series D-L Shares. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Description of Securities.”

In January 2010, FEMSA announced that its Board of Directors unanimously approved a definitive agreement under which FEMSA would exchange its FEMSA Cerveza business for a 20% economic interest in Heineken, one of the world’s leading brewers. In April 2010, FEMSA announced the closing of the transaction, after Heineken N.V., Heineken Holding N.V. and FEMSA held their corresponding AGMs and approved the transaction. Under the terms of the agreement, FEMSA received 43,018,320 shares of Heineken Holding N.V. and 43,009,699 shares of Heineken N.V., with an additional 29,172,504 shares of Heineken N.V. (which shares we refer to as the Allotted Shares) to be delivered pursuant to an allotted share delivery instrument, or the ASDI. Heineken also assumed US$ 2.1 billion of indebtedness, including FEMSA Cerveza’s unfunded pension obligations. The Allotted Shares were delivered to FEMSA in several installments during 2010 and 2011, with the final installment delivered on October 5, 2011. As of December 31, 2012,2013, FEMSA’s interest in Heineken N.V. represented 12.53% of Heineken N.V.’s outstanding capital and 14.94% of Heineken Holding N.V.’s outstanding capital.capital, resulting in our 20% economic interest in the Heineken Group. The principal terms of the Heineken transaction documents are summarized below in “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts.”

In February 2010, FEMSA signed an agreement with subsidiaries of The Coca-Cola Company to amend the shareholders agreement for Coca-Cola FEMSA. The purpose of the amendment is to set forth that the appointment and compensation of the chief executive officer and all officers reporting to the chief executive officer, as well as the adoption of decisions related to the ordinary operations of Coca-Cola FEMSA, shall only require a simple majority vote of the board of directors. Decisions related to extraordinary matters (such as business acquisitions or combinations in an amount exceeding US$ 100 million, among others) shall continue to require the vote of the majority of the board of directors, including the affirmative vote of two of the board members appointed by The Coca-Cola Company. The amendment was approved at Coca-Cola FEMSA’s extraordinary shareholders meeting on April 14, 2010, and is reflected in the bylaws of Coca-Cola FEMSA. This amendment was signed without transfer of any consideration. The percentage of our voting interest in our subsidiary Coca-Cola FEMSA remains the same after the signing of this amendment.

In September 2010, FEMSA sold Promotora de Marcas Nacionales, S. de R.L. de C.V., which we refer to as Promotora, to The Coca-Cola Company. Promotora was the owner of theMundet brands of soft drinks in Mexico.

On December 31, 2010, FEMSA sold its flexible packaging and label operations, Grafo Regia, S.A. de C.V., to a Mexican subsidiary of GPC III, B.V. This transaction was part of FEMSA’s strategy to divest non-core businesses.

During the third quarter of 2010, Coca-Cola FEMSA completed a transaction with a Brazilian subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company to produce, sell and distributeMatte Leão branded products. This transaction reinforced Coca-Cola FEMSA’s non-carbonated product offering through the platform that is operated by The Coca-Cola Company and its bottling partners in Brazil. As a part of the agreement, Coca-Cola FEMSA has been selling and distributing certainMatte Leão branded ready-to-drink products since the first quarter of 2010. As of March 31, 2013, Coca-Cola FEMSA had a 19.4% indirect interest in theMatte Leãobusiness in Brazil.

In March 2011, a consortium of investors formed by FEMSA, the Macquarie Mexican Infrastructure Fund and other investors, acquired Energía Alterna Istmeña, S. de R.L. de C.V., which we refer to as EAI, and Energía Eólica Mareña, S.A. de C.V., which we refer to as EEM, from subsidiaries of Preneal, S.A., which we refer to as Preneal. EAI and EEM together constitute the Mareña Renovables Wind Farm, a 396 megawatt late-stage wind energy project in the southeastern region of the State of Oaxaca. The Mareña Renovables Wind Farm is expected to be the largest wind power farm in Latin America. On February 23, 2012, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mitsubishi Corporation, and Stichting Depositary PGGM Infrastructure Funds, a pension fund managed by PGGM, acquired the 45% interest held by FEMSA in the parent companies of the Mareña Renovables Wind Farm. The sale of FEMSA’s participation as an investor resulted in a gain of Ps. 933 million. Certain subsidiaries of FEMSA, FEMSA Comercio and Coca-Cola FEMSA have entered into 20-year wind power supply agreements with the Mareña Renovables Wind Farm to purchase energy output produced by it. These agreements will remain in full force and effect.

In March 2011, Coca-Cola FEMSA, with The Coca-Cola Company and through Compañía Panameña de Bebidas, S.A.P.I. de C.V., acquired Grupo Industrias LácteasLacteas, S.A., which (which we refer to as Estrella Azul,Azul), a Panamanian company engaged for more than 50 years in the dairy and juice-based beverage categories. Coca-Cola FEMSA acquired a 50% interest and will continuecontinues to develop this business with The Coca-Cola Company. Beginning in April 2011, both The Coca-Cola Company and Coca-Cola FEMSA commenced the gradual integration of Estrella Azul into the existing beverage platform they share for the development of non-carbonated products in Panama.

In October 2011, Coca-Cola FEMSA merged with Administradora de Acciones del Noreste, S.A.P.I. de C.V., which constituted the beverage division of Grupo Tampico, S.A. de C.V. (which we refer to as Grupo Tampico) and was one of the largest family-ownedCoca-Cola product bottlers in Mexico, as calculated by sales volume.. This franchise territory operates in the states of Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosí and Veracruz, as well as in certain parts of the states of Hidalgo, Puebla and Querétaro, and sold 155.7 million unit cases of beverages in 2011. The aggregate enterprise value of this transaction was Ps. 9,300 million and a total of 63.5 million new Coca-Cola FEMSA Series L Shares were issued in connection with this transaction. Coca-Cola FEMSA began to consolidate the beverage division of Grupo Tampico in its financial statements as of October 2011.taro.

In December 2011, Coca-Cola FEMSA merged with Corporación de los Ángeles, S.A. de C.V. (which we refer to as Grupo CIMSA), a Mexican family-owned bottler ofCoca-Cola trademark products. This franchise territory operates mainly in the states of Morelos and Mexico, as well as in certain parts of the states of Guerrero and Michoacán, and sold 154.8 million unit cases of beverages in 2011. The aggregate enterprise value at the announcement date of this transaction was Ps. 11,000 million. A total of 75.4 million new Coca-Cola FEMSA Series L Shares were issued in connection with the transaction, and Coca-Cola FEMSA began to consolidate Grupo CIMSA in its financial statements as of December 2011. As part of its merger with Grupo CIMSA, Coca-Cola FEMSA acquired a 13.2% equity interest in Promotora Industrial Azucarera, S.A. de C.V., one of Mexico’s leading sugar producers, which we refer to as Piasa.n.

In 2012, Coca-Cola FEMSA began the construction of a production plant in Minas Gerais, Brazil, which has required an investment of 400520 million Brazilian reais (equivalent to approximately US$ 198260 million). We expect that the construction will generate 800 direct and indirect jobs. It is anticipated that the new plant will be completed as of December 2013in July 2014 and will begin operations induring the firstthird quarter of 2014. The plant will be located on a parcel of land 300,000 square meters in size, and itIt is expected that by 2015 the annual production capacity will be approximately 1.2 billion liters of sparkling beverages, representing an increase of approximately 47%62% as compared to the current installed capacity of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s plant in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The new plant will produce all of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s existing brands and presentations ofCoca-Cola products.

In May 2012, Coca-Cola FEMSA closed its merger with Grupo Fomento Queretano, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (“(which we refer to as Grupo Fomento Queretano”)Queretano), one of the oldest family-owned beverage players in theCoca-Cola system in Mexico, with operations mainly in the state of Querétaro, as well as in parts of the states of Mexico, Hidalgo, and Guanajuato. Coca-Cola FEMSA sold approximately 74 million unit cases of beverages in this franchise territory during 2012. The aggregate enterprise value of this transaction was Ps. 6,600 million and a total of 45.1 million new Coca-Cola FEMSA series L shares were issued in connection with this transaction. Coca-Cola FEMSA began to consolidate Grupo Fomento Queretano in its financial statements as of May 2012. As part of the merger with Grupo Fomento Queretano, Coca-Cola FEMSA also acquired an additional 12.9% equity interest in Piasa.

In August 2012, Coca-Cola FEMSA acquired, through Jugos del Valle, an indirect participation in Santa Clara Mercantil de Pachuca, S.A. de C.V. (“Santa Clara”), an important producer of milk and dairy products in Mexico. Coca-Cola FEMSA currently owns an indirect participation of 23.8% in Santa Clara.

On September 24, 2012, FEMSA signed definitive agreements to sell its wholly owned subsidiary Industria Mexicana de Quimicos, S.A. de C.V. (“Quimiproductos”)(which we refer to as Quimiproductos) to a Mexican subsidiary of Ecolab Inc. (NYSE: ECL). Quimiproductos manufactures and provides cleaning and sanitizing products and services related to food and beverage industrial processes, as well as water treatment. The transaction is consistent with FEMSA’s long-standing strategy to divest non-core businesses. Quimiproductos was sold on December 31, 2012, resulting in a gain of Ps. 871 million.

Recent Acquisitions

In November 2012, through FEMSA Comercio, we agreed to acquire a 75% stake in Farmacias YZA, a leading drugstore operator in Southeast Mexico, with the current shareholders staying as partners with the remaining 25%. Farmacias YZA, headquartered in Merida, Yucatan, operated 333 stores as of the date of the agreement. We believe we can contribute our significant expertise in the development of small-box retail formats to what is already a successful regional player in this industry. In turn, this transaction opens a new avenue for growth for FEMSA Comercio. The transaction is pending customary regulatory approvals and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2013.

In December 2012,On January 25, 2013, Coca-Cola FEMSA reached an agreementclosed the transaction with The Coca-Cola Company to acquire a 51% non-controlling majority stake ofin CCBPI for US$ 688.5 million (Ps. 8,904 million) in an all-cash transaction. Coca-Cola FEMSA closed this transaction on January 25, 2013. The implied enterprise value of 100% of CCPBI is US$ 1,350 million. Coca-Cola FEMSA will havehas an option to acquire all of the remaining 49% of the capital stock ofstake in CCBPI at any time during the seven years following the closing at the same enterprise value adjusted for a carrying cost and certain other adjustments.date. Coca-Cola FEMSA will havealso has a put option exercisable six years after the initial closing, to sell its ownership in CCBPI back to The Coca-Cola Company at a price that will be calculated usingcommencing on the same EBITDA multiple used in the acquisitionfifth anniversary of the 51% stakeclosing date and ending on the sixth anniversary of CCBPI, capped at the aggregate enterprise value for the amount acquired, adjusted for certain items.closing date. Coca-Cola FEMSA will be managingcurrently manages the day-to-day operations of the business. The Coca-Cola Company will have certain rights onbusiness; however, during a four-year period ending January 25, 2017 the business plan and other operational business plan. Given the terms of both the options agreement and Coca-Cola FEMSA’s shareholders agreementdecisions must be taken jointly with The Coca-Cola Company,Company. Coca-Cola FEMSA will not consolidate the results of CCBPI, and will recognizecurrently recognizes the results of CCBPI using the equity method. CCBPI sold approximately 531 million unit cases of beverages during 2012 and generated revenues of approximately US$ 1.1 billion.

In JanuaryMay 2013, Coca-Cola FEMSA entered into an agreement to mergeclosed its merger with Grupo Yoli, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo Yoli”) intoone of the oldest family-owned Coca-Cola FEMSA. Grupo Yoli operatesbottlers in Mexico, operating mainly in the state of Guerrero Mexico, as well as in parts of the state of Oaxaca, Mexico.Oaxaca.

On May 2, 2013, FEMSA Comercio through one of its subsidiaries, Cadena Comercial de Farmacias, S.A.P.I. de C.V. ( which we refer to as CCF), closed the acquisition of Farmacias YZA, a leading drugstore operator in Southeast Mexico, headquartered in Merida, Yucatan. The merger agreement was approved by bothfounding shareholders of Farmacias YZA hold a 25% stake in CCF. In a separate transaction, on May 13, 2013, CCF acquired Farmacias FM Moderna, a leading drugstore operator in the western state of Sinaloa.

In August 2013, Coca-Cola FEMSA and Grupo Yoli’s boardsclosed its acquisition of directors and is subjectCompanhia Fluminense de Refrigerantes (which we refer to the approvalas Companhia Fluminense), a family owned franchise that operates in parts of the Comisión Federalstates of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Competencia (the Mexican Antitrust Comission, or CFC) and the shareholders’ meetings of both companies. Grupo YoliJaneiro in Brazil. Companhia Fluminense sold approximately 9956.6 million unit cases (including beer) in 2012. The aggregate enterprise valuethe twelve months ended March 31, 2013.

In October 2013, the Board of this transaction was Ps. 8,806 million.Directors agreed to separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, ratifying José Antonio Fernández Carbajal as Executive Chairman of the Board and naming Carlos Salazar Lomelín as the new Chief Executive Officer of FEMSA.

In October 2013, Coca-Cola FEMSA will issueclosed its acquisition of Spaipa, the second largest family owned franchise in Brazil, with operations in the state of Paraná and in parts of the state of São Paulo. Spaipa sold approximately 42.4233.3 million new series “L” shares tounit cases (including beer) in the twelve months ended June 30, 2013.

In December 2013, FEMSA Comercio, through one of its subsidiaries, purchased the operating assets and trademarks of Doña Tota, a leading quick-service restaurant operator in Mexico. The founding shareholders of Grupo Yoli once the transaction closes. As part of this transaction, Coca-Cola FEMSA will increase its participation in Piasa by 9.5%. Coca-Cola FEMSA expects to close this transactionDoña Tota hold a 20% stake in the second quarter of 2013.FEMSA Comercio subsidiary that now operates the Doña Tota business.

For more information on Coca-Cola FEMSA’s recent transactions, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Coca-Cola FEMSA.”

Ownership Structure

We conduct our business through our principal sub-holding companies as shown in the following diagram and table:

Principal Sub-holding Companies—Ownership Structure

As of March 31, 20132014

The following table presents an overview of our operations by reportable segment and by geographic area:

Operations by Segment—Overview

Year Ended December 31, 20122013 and % of growth (decrease) vs. last year⁽¹⁾